Google
This is a digital copy of a book that was preserved for generations on library shelves before it was carefully scanned by Google as part of a project
to make the world's books discoverable online.
It has survived long enough for the copyright to expire and the book to enter the public domain. A public domain book is one that was never subject
to copyright or whose legal copyright term has expired. Whether a book is in the public domain may vary country to country. Public domain books
are our gateways to the past, representing a wealth of history, culture and knowledge that's often difficult to discover.
Marks, notations and other maiginalia present in the original volume will appear in this file - a reminder of this book's long journey from the
publisher to a library and finally to you.
Usage guidelines
Google is proud to partner with libraries to digitize public domain materials and make them widely accessible. Public domain books belong to the
public and we are merely their custodians. Nevertheless, this work is expensive, so in order to keep providing tliis resource, we liave taken steps to
prevent abuse by commercial parties, including placing technical restrictions on automated querying.
We also ask that you:
+ Make non-commercial use of the files We designed Google Book Search for use by individuals, and we request that you use these files for
personal, non-commercial purposes.
+ Refrain fivm automated querying Do not send automated queries of any sort to Google's system: If you are conducting research on machine
translation, optical character recognition or other areas where access to a large amount of text is helpful, please contact us. We encourage the
use of public domain materials for these purposes and may be able to help.
+ Maintain attributionTht GoogXt "watermark" you see on each file is essential for in forming people about this project and helping them find
additional materials through Google Book Search. Please do not remove it.
+ Keep it legal Whatever your use, remember that you are responsible for ensuring that what you are doing is legal. Do not assume that just
because we believe a book is in the public domain for users in the United States, that the work is also in the public domain for users in other
countries. Whether a book is still in copyright varies from country to country, and we can't offer guidance on whether any specific use of
any specific book is allowed. Please do not assume that a book's appearance in Google Book Search means it can be used in any manner
anywhere in the world. Copyright infringement liabili^ can be quite severe.
About Google Book Search
Google's mission is to organize the world's information and to make it universally accessible and useful. Google Book Search helps readers
discover the world's books while helping authors and publishers reach new audiences. You can search through the full text of this book on the web
at|http: //books .google .com/I
D,a,l,zc.bvG00gIe
D,a,l,zc.bvG00gIe
D,a,l,zc.bvG00gIC
D,a,l,zc.bvG00gIC
D,a,l,zc.bvG00gIe
If/
w-^
D,a,l,zc.bvG00gIC
A HISTORY
MODERN EUROPE
O. A. FYFFE, M.A.
B*BKtSTER-A
FROM 1848 TO 1878
NEW YOUK
HENRY HOLT AN'D COMPANY
1800
i,z<..t,CoogIf
D,a,l,zc.bvG00gIe
CONTENTS,
THX lUBCH BITOLCTIOV, 1818.
Enrapa' in 17S9 and ia IBIS — Agitetion in Waatem Oemunj 'hebaa v^
After tho BsTolution st Puis — Aaatrik uid Hungary — The Mmxi^
Bavolation Ht Tiamu—flight of Uettenuch— The UungBiim Diet —
HQiutlc7 win* ita independence— Bobemiui moTement — Aatoaomj
fnmuaed lo Boheaiia — Intuirection of Lomhaidj — Of Veoio*— Pied-
mont makea -war on Aiutno — A geneml Italian mz againft Aiutria
inuQiiMmt— The March liayVtt- Berlin— Frederiok WiQiMD IV.— A
NaticHtal Aaoembly praniu^ — Sco]<uv>0-^aiBtfiiii-— InauireotiaQ in
Hobtein— War between Qenp^y and Ddnniark^Tue Qerman Ante-
Parliament— Bepnhlican Bi«^t;. ii[.^,iaen-;-Mjetiag of tlie Ghnnan
National Ajraembly at Fianldort^-liljircige jonarallj in March, 1M6 —
Tfao Kflnch Fioniiooal Qov^Uv^ir-Xha .Notional Workahapa — Iha
QoTornment and the Beit £«pi^blkvit^^E^(j^ NtttUmal Awemblf-^
Biot of Maj 11 — Ueaauraa against Uie'KaiMiwl.WorkahopB- The Four
Days ctf June — Oaraignao — Iiouia Napoleon— Ho ia alooted to the
OHAPTEU n.
Anibria and Italj—TJemiA favm Haioh to Uaj— Flight of the Ernpens —
Bohemian National Movoment — Windiacligriiti aubdoea Prague — Oam-
paign anmid Tenoa — Papal AllooutioQ— Naples in U«)' — Negotiatiaaa
•■ to Lombard — Baoonqnert of Venetia — Battle of OnatoiLaa — The
Anatriana enter Uilan — Austrian Court and Hungary — llie Serb* in
Sootlietii Hnnguy— Bcrb Congieaa at Carlowiti — Jellaoia — AJIain of
tVfntia Ji^lafflr, the Ooort and the Himgaiian Uorement — Murdor of
lambeig-— Manifesto of Ootobar S — Vienna on October < — Hie Smpmot
■t Olmfitl — Windiacbi^ratB conqnen Vienna — The Parliament at
Kiemaiar — Schmusenbeig Uiniater—Ferdiiiaiid abdicatea — Diaaoloticin
of tha Kreznaier Parliameot— Unitary Edict — Hungary — The Boo-
maniftiw in Tnutaylvaniai — The Austrian Army ocoapie* Peatb— Hniw
prian QoTamment at Bebrecsia-'Tbe AuBtriaoa driran out of Hnngatj
— Declaration of Hungarian Independence — Rueoiaii TntnrmnHnn i
Oie Hungariaa Sanuner Campaign — Oapitolatiea of Vilagoa — itfdj^,[ -,
MODERN mTBOPR
— Hnrdei of Roid— ToBcany^Ihs March Ounptugn in Lombardy
— Novai« — Abdication ol Charles Alhert — Viotor Enmumael— BMbna-
Uon in Trucany — French Intervention in Boms — Defeat of Ondiaot —
Ondinot and Leaups— The Pi«nch enter Boma— The Beetorad Pontifical
Government — Fall of Venice — Ferdinand Taconqnerfl Sicilj — Qarnuuf
— The National Aiaemblj at Fiankfort — The Armistice of HalioS —
Berlin from April to September — The Pnmian Armj — Laat Dayi of
the Pnuaian Parliament — Pnmian Constitntion granted hj Edict — ^The
Geiman National Agaemblj and Aiutria — Frederick William IT,
dected Emperor — He rafuaea the Crown — End of the National Assemblj
— Fnuaia attempts to form a aepante Union — The XJnion Parliament at
Erfurt — Action of Atutria — Eeese-Chsael— The Diet of Fmnhfort re-
■tored — Olmiiti — Schleawig-Holatein— Qermany after IS4S — Anstria
after 1B5I— France after IBIS— Loois Napoleon— The October Heaaago
— law Idmiting the Fianohiaa — Looia Napoleon and the Ann; — Fr«-
poeed Beriaion of tiie Constitution — The Oonp d'fitat— Napcdaon TTr.
Bn^nnd and Fnmce ii^ I^L — £nidL>,v^iiier-Nioholaa — The HnngaiJsn
Befngeei — Dispute lAfinqi.Tn^uv^ntatt^Boaria on the H0I7 Places —
Nioholaa and the BxidA Xjnhanador— Lord Sbatford da Bedcliffe —
MenachikifTa Mission — Bossian troops enter the Danubian Frincipalitiea
— Lorf AherdBen's Cabinet — Hovements of the Fleela— ITio Vienna
Note — 1^ Fleets pass the Daidanellee — Tnrkiih Squadron deetrojed
at Knopa— DsclaratioQ of War— Policy of Austria— Policy of Pnurift
— TOa Western Powen and the Buroponn Concert— Siege of Silistria —
Tha Fiininpalitiea eracnated— Forthar objects of the Western Powcm
— InTsdon of the Crimea — Battle of the Alma— The Flank Mareb—
BaladtaTa — Inkermann^Winter in the Crimea— Death of Nicholas —
Oontemioe of Vienna — Aostria — Progress of the Kegs — Flans of
Napoleon HX — Chnrobert and P£lismer — TTnsncceesfiil Assault — Battle
of the Tchemaya— Oaptnre of the Ualakoff— Fall of SebMtopoL-XUl
of Ears— Negotiations for Peaoe— The Conferenoe of Faria— TrMty of
Paria— The Dannbian Rindpalities— Continued dijcoid in the Ottoman
Empirs-Bevision of the Trttif of Paris in 1B7I t
OHAPTEB IV.
THl OSEATIOV or TRX TTAUAX KUTaDOK
nediB0Dt«fterl8«9— Ministry of Aieglio—Oavoar Prima Minister— DesEgns
at OaTonr^-His Ckimean Policy — OaTOur at the Oonferaooa of Fuia —
Oavoor and Ni^poleon m. — ^Ilie Meeting at PlomhiirM— Propaiatiaw
in Italy — Trca^ of Janoaiy, ISGe — Attmapts at Mediation— Ansbrira
Uhirmtnm— Oampsign of 13S9— Msgent*— Horemeat in Cenfa^lltaljr
OONTETHTB. i
— floUerino — Napoleon and PrnBut-'Ioterriow of TOkimnca — Oavonr
nmgnfr— Peue of Zikioli— Otalnl Italr after TiUafniua— Tie Pn>-
poMd GoDgren — "Tha Pope and tiw CoDgreM"—CI>Toar resumes offio*
— O&TOQT and Napoleoo— Unum of th* Dnchie* and the Bomagoa wiQi
Piodmont — Sbtoj and Nice added to !Fianae — ChTour on this nwni'fTii —
Europ«Hil opinion— -Naplea — Sicily — Oaribaldi land* at Manwla — C^-
tore of I^leimo — The Heapolitaoi oraoaktA Sioily — Otoot and tiba
Party of Action — Caronr'a Policy aa to Naplaa — Garibaldi on the main-
hod — Fer«aiio and VJlUmarina at Naplea — Qarihkldi at Naplea — The
Kadmonteaa Aimy enters Umbm and the UarohM — Fall of Ancona —
Garibaldi and Cavour — The Annies on the Yoltumo — Fall of Qtteta —
Cavoni't Policy with r^ard to Rome and Tsnioe — DmUi of Oavont —
Dm Free Cbiiroh in the Fi«e Stato 2
SBBlUn ASCBNDESOY WOIT BT FBITBBU.
ennanyaftei 1S5S — ^le Bcgmuty in Pnisaia — Aimy-reorgaiuBation — King
WilUain I.— Oonfliot between the Crown and the Piirliament — Bismarck
—Tita atra^ls continoed— Austria tram 1S69 — Hie October Diploma
— EanBtfuice of Hnngary — The Seicharath — RuMia under Alexander
n.— liberation of the Serfs — Poland— The Inmireotion of 18S3 —
Agrarian meaanrea in Poland — SchlaBwig-HoIstein — Death of Frederick
TIL — Plan* of Blsmaick — Oampaig^n in Sohleawig— Confarenoe of
London — Treaty of Tienoo — England and Napoleon III. — Pnuaia and
Auitiia — Convention of Gkatein — Italy — Alliaiioe of Pruaaia with Italy
— Proposals for a Coogreea fail — Wat between Aortria and Prussia-.
Napoleon III. — KiniiiJ g-iitz — Cnfitoaaa— Hediatioa of Napoleon — Treaty
of Prague— South Oannany — Frojeds tor compensation to France —
Aoatria and Hnngary— DeAk — Establishment of the Dnal System in
Anatria-Hoiigaiy . . . t
OHAPTEB TI.
TB> VAK BBTWEBN TSAVCB AND aBBHAlTT,
Napoleon XEL— ^lle Uexioan ETpedition— Withdrawal of the French aad
death of Uaiimilian — The Lniemburg Qneetion — Fxaapeiatioo in
n«nce against Pruaaia— Austria — Italy — Hentana— Qermany after
I3A6 — The Sponiah Candidature of Leopold of Hohenzollom — French
declaration — Bwiedetti and King William — 'Wthdrawal of Leopold and
demand for gnaraotees — The telegram from Ems — War— Eipected
AllianoM of France — Anetria— Italy — Protdan plana — The French
army — Chosee of t'rench inferiority — Weissenbm^ — W3rth — Spicheren
— Bomy — Hara-la-Tonr — Onvelotte — Sedan — The BepubUo pro-
claimed at Paria — Favre and BianuLTck — Siege of Paris — Qambetta at
Toiua — The Aimy of the Loire — Fall of Met*— Fig^iting at Oi'lcan«-K_)'MC
ifil XODBBN SUSOPA
Sortja of Cb^mpgay—The Ajmiei of Oie North, of flw L«Hifl, of tiie
BbM — Boarbaki'B min — Oapitotation of Parii and ArmiitioB — Prolimi-
DBiiee (rf Pcaoe — Garmanj'— Ertabliihment of His Qeraun Empire—
Ilia Commime of Fuia — Seoond Bioge — Sfieots of tba war m to
BmsU and Italj— Bomo . . tSI
CHAPTER VIL
S^BTSSK A.WWA.ntt,
Fnuioe after 1871— AUianoe of Qm Three Emperon—IteTDlt of HanxgOTina
—The AoiiiBBj Nat»— Voider of tlie Oongols at Salonika— The Bsriin
Hamorandum— Rejected by Et^Iand^AhduI Axiz depoaed— Mamaoiea
in Bulgaria — Sftrvia and Montenegro declare War — Opinion in Bngrland
— Diiraell— Meeting of Emperora at Bsicbitadt — Bervian Campaign —
Declaraljon of the Ctair— Confoenoe at Canitantinoplo— Ita Failnifr—
The London Frotoool— Rusraa declaiea War— Advance on the Balkana
d Attack on FleTna— Olie BMpka PaM—
; Attack on Plerna— Todlebon- Fall of Flema—
Paeaage of the Balkmia- Aimislaoe— England- The Fleet paaaea the
PardanoIIoa Treaty of Son Stefano— England and Sauta— Secret
Agreement— ConTSntion with Turkey — OongrMS of Berlin— "K^a^ of
- - ~ - - tu
D,a,l,zc.bvG00gIe
MODEEN EUEOPE.
CHAPTER I.
BniDpa in 178S uid in lUS — A^Ution ia 'Weateni (iurmtuij befors and after
the BeTtdatioii at Paria — Austria and Hongaij — The Maioh Barolation at
Vieona — Flight of Ucttarnich — Hie Hungtuian Diet — Hungar; wina ita
isdependenoe — Bohemian movement — Antonomy promiied to Boliemia —
Inaurrection of Lombaidy — Of V^o« — Kadmont mftkoi war on Austria —
A general Italian war against Anttria imminent — The Hazoh Daja at Berlin
— Frederick William IV. — A National AMemblj promieed — Bchleswig-Hol-
■teio — luanirection in Holstein— War between Qurmaii; and Denmark —
The Qerman Ante-FarliameDt — Hepublioaa Bisiug in Baden— Meeting of
the Oerauut National Aasembly at Frankfort— Europe gensniUf in Haroh,
1S48— Hie French Fraiimonal OoTemment—The National Workshop*—
Hie Qoremment and the Bed Repnhlicani — French National Aassmbl; —
Blot of Ma; It — Haaauiea against the National Workahopa — The Four
Da^of Jnne — CaTsignao — Looi* Napoleon — Eeiialeoted to tboAMemhlj
—Sleeted Fre^lent.
There were few statesmen living in 1848 who, like
Mettemich and like Lotus Philippe, could rememher
the outbreak of the French Revolution. To those who
could so look back across the space of sixty years, a
comparison of the European movements that followed
the snccesBive onslaughts upon authority in France
afforded some measure of the change that had passed
over the political atmosphere of the Continent within a
single lifetime. The Eevolution of 1789, deeply as it
stirred men's minds in neighbouring coun- ^^^^^^^^ ^ ^^
tries, had occasioned no popular outbreak ■^■^^^
on. a large scale outside France. The e^^ulsion of
2 KODSBN EUBOPB. urn.
Charles X. in 1830 had been followed hj national
uprisings in Italy, Poland, and Belgium, cmd by a
stm^le for constitutional government in tbe smaller
States of Korthern Genuanj. The downfall of Louis
Philippe in 1848 at once convulsed the whole of central
Europe. From the Rhenish Provinces to the Ottoman
frontier there was no government but the Swiss Kepub-
lic that was not menaced ; there was no race which did
not assert its claim to a more or less complete inde-
pendence. Communities whose long slumber biwl been
undisturbed by the shocks of the Napoleonic period
now vibrated with those same impulses which, since
1815, no pressure of absolute power had been able
wholly to extinguish in Italy and Germany. The
borders of the region of political discontent had been
enlarged; where apa.thy, or immemorial loyalty to some
distant crown, had long closed the ear to the voices of
the new age, now all was restlessness, all eager expecta-
tion of the dawning epoch of national life. This was
especially tbe case with the Slavic races included in the
Austriim Empire, i-aces which during the earlier years
of this century had been wholly mute. These in their
turn now felt the breath of patriotism, and claimed tbe
right of self-government. Distinct as the ideas of
national independence and of constitutional liberty are
in themselves, they were not distinct in their operation
over a great part, of Europe in 1848; and this epoch
will be wrongly conceived if it is viewed as no more
than a repetition on a large scale of the democratic out-
break of Paris with which it opened. More was sought
M suBOPs nr tm- *
in Europe in 1848 than the substitution of popular for
monarchical or aristocratic role. The effort to make
the State one with the nation excited wider interests
than the effort to enhtrge and equalise citizen rights;
and it is in the action of this principle of nationality
that we find the explanation of tendencies of the epoch
which appear at first view to be in direct conflict with
one another. In Germany a single race was divided
under many goTemments : here the national instinct
impelled to unity. In Austria a variety of races was
held together by one crown : here the national instinct
impelled to separation. In both these States, as in
It^y, where the predominance of the foreigner and the
continuance of despotic government were in a peculiar
manner connected with one another, the efforts of 1848
iaHed ; but the problems which then agitated Europe
could not long be set aside, uid the solution of them,
complete in the case of Germany and Italy, partial and
tentative in the case of Austria, renders the succeeding
twenty-five years a memorable period in European
history.
The sudden disappearance of the Orleanist monarchy
and the proclamation of the Bepublic at Paris struck
with dismay the Qovemments beyond the
Shine. DifScuIties were already gathering waatoaa^
round them, opposition among their own
subjects was daily becoming more formidable and more
outspoken. In Western Germany a meeting of
Liberal deputies had been held in the autumn of 1847,
in which the reform of the Federal Constitution and the
, J , . . Cooylc
4 MODERN EjmOFS. UtK
establishment of a German Parliament had been de-
manded : a Republican or revolutionaiy party, small but
virulent, had also its own avowed policy and its recog-
nised organs in the press. No sooner had the news of
the Bevolution at Paris passed the frontier than in all
the minor German States the cry for reform became
irresistible. Ministers everywhere resigned ; the popular
demands were granted ; and men were called to office
whose names were identified with the struggle for the
freedom of the Press, for trial by jury, and for the
reform of the Federal Constitution. The Federal Diet
itself, so long the instrument of absolutism, bowed
beneath the stress of the time, abolished the laws of
censorship, and invited the Governments to send Com-
missioners to Frankfort to discuss the reorganisation of
Germany. It was notj however, at Frankfort or at the
minor capitals that the conRict between authority and
its antagonists wa-s to be decided. Vienna, the strong-
hold of absolutism, the sanctuary from which so many
interdicts had gone forth against freedom in eveiy part
of Europe, was itself invaded by the revolutionary
spirit. The clear sky darkened, and Mettemich found
himself powerless before the storm.
There had been until 1848 so complete an absence
of political life in the Austrian capital, that, when the
conviction suddenly burst upon all minds
that the ancient order was doomed, there
were neither party-leaders to confront the Government,
nor plans of reform upon which any considerable body
of men were ^eed. The first utterances of public
discontent were petitions drawn up by the Chamljer of
Commerce and by literary associations. These were
vague in purport and far from aggressive in their tone.
A sterner note sounded when intelligence reached the
capital of the resolutions that had been passed by the
Hungarian Lower House on the 3rd of March, and of
the language in which these had been enforced by
Kossuth. Casting aside all reserve, the Magyar leader
bad declared that the reigning dynasty could only be
saved by granting to Hungary a responsible Ministry
drawn from the Diet itself, and by establishing consti-
tutional government throughout the Aostrian dominions.
" From the charnel-house of the Viennese system," he
cried, " a poison-laden atmosphere steab over us, which
paralyses our nerves and bows us when we would soar.
The future of Hungary can never be secure while in the
other provinces there exists a system of government in
direct antf^nism to every constitutional principle. Our
task it is to found a happier future on the brotherhood
of all the Austrian races, and to substitute for the
union enforced by bayonets and police the enduring
bond of a free constitution." When the Hungarian
Assembly had thus taken into its own bands the cause
of the rest of the monarchy, it was not for the citizens
of Vienna to fall short in the extent of their demands.
The idea of a Constitution for the Empire at large was
generally accepted, and it was proposed that an address
embodying this demand should be sent in to the
Emperor by the Provincial Estates of Lower Austria,
whose meeting happened to he fixed for the 13th of
< m>DBaJ!r eusopb. iw
March. In the meantime the students made themBelves
the heroes of the hour. The agitation of the city in-
creased ; mmoars of State bankruptcy and of the im-
pending repudiation of the paper currency filled all
classes with the belief that some catastrophe was near
at hand.*
The Provincial Estates of Lower Austria had long
fallen into such insignificance that in ordinary times
their proceedings were hardly noticed by
TuhjtiM at the capital. The accident that they were
now to assemble in the midst of a great
crisis elevated them to a sudden importance. It was
believed that the decisive word would be spoken in the
course of their debates ; and on the morning of the I3th
of March masses of the populace, led by a procession of
students, assembled round the Hall of the Diet. While
the debate proceeded within, street-orators inflamed the
passions of the crowd outside. The tumult deepened j
and when at length a note was let down from one of the
windows of the Hall stating that the Diet were inclining
to half-measures, the mob broke into uproar, and an
attack was made upon the Diet Hatl itself. The lead-
ing members of the Estates were compelled to place
themselves at the head of a deputation, which proceeded
to the Emperor's palace in order to enforce the demands
of the people. The Emperor himself, who at no time
* Uettenuch, riL 538, 603 ; Titztlitim, Berlin and Wieu, 1845-62, p. 76 1
Eoosntfa, Werke (1850), iL 78; Filleredorff, Rackblieke, p. 22;
B«schftTier, Das Jahr 1848, L 191 ; gpriager, Oeschicht« OMterrdcha, IL
185 i Ii&iiji et GhMBin, B^ralotion dd Hongrie. i 128.
I i,z<..t,CoogIf
Ml nENN± 7
was capable of paying serions attention to business,
remained invisible during tbis and tbe two followiog
days ; the deputation was received by Mettemich and
the principal officers of State, who were assembled in
council. Meanwhile the crowds in the streets became
denser and more excited ; soldiers approached, to protect
the Diet Hall and to guard tbe environs of the palace ;
there was an interval of confusion ; and on the advance
of a new regiment, which was mistaken for an attack,
the mob who had stormed the Diet Hall hurled the
shattered furniture from the windows upon the soldiers'
heads. A volley was now fired, which cost several lives.
At tbe sound of the firing still deeper agitation seized
the city. Barricades were erected, and the people and
soldiers fought hand to hand. As evening came
on, deputation after deputation pressed into tbe palace
to nrge concession upon the Government. Met-
temich, who, almost alone in the Council, had made
light of tbe popular uprising, now at length consented
to certain definite measures of reform. He retired into
an adjoining room to draft an order abolishing tbe cen-
sorship of the Press. During his absence tbe cry was
raised among the deputations that thronged tbe Council-
chamber, " Down with Mettemich ! " The old man
returned, and found himself abandoned by his col-
leagues. There were some among them, members of
^e Imperial family, who had long been bis opponents ;
others who had in vain urged him to make concessions
before it was too late. Mettemich saw that the end of
his career was come ; he spoke a few words, marked by
6 MOVBSN SVSOPS. im
all the dignity aud self-possession of liis greatest days,
and withdrew, to place his resignation in the Emperor's
handj).
For thirty-nine years Metternich had been so com-
plfctely identified with the Austrian system of govem-
YtigtAai lu^^t that in his fall that entire system
seemed to have vanished away. The tamulfc
of the capital subsided on the mere announcement of
his resignation, though the hatred which he had excited
rendered it unsafe for him to remain within reach of
hostile hands. He was conveyed from Tienna by a
faithful secretary on the night of the 14th of March,
and, after remaining for a few days in concealment,
crossed the Saxon frontier. His exile was - destined to
be of some duration, but no exile was ever more cheer-
fully borne, or sweetened by a profounder satisfaction
at the evils which a mad world had brought upon
itself by driving from it its one thoroughly wise and
just statesman. Betaking himself in the general crash
of the Continental Courts to Great Britain, which was
still as safe aa when he had visited it fifty-five years
before, Metternich received a kindly welcome from the
Duke of Wellington and the leaders of English society;
and when the London season was over he sought and
found at Brighton something of the liveliness and the
sunshine of his own southern home.*
* Uettemich, Tiii. 181. The utiinatioii of his remarks on kU eorte of
poinla in Engliah life ia wonderfnl. After k halt st BmeBelB and ti, bia
JohuudsbnT^ eslst« Mettemioh returned to Tienna in 1852, and, thongh
not restored to office, resumed his great poaition in aocietj. He lived
through the Criioean War, on wUcIi te wrot« nomeroiu mewonndA, tor
The action of the HiiDgarian Diet under Kossuth's
leadership had powerfullj iDflaeaced the course of events
at Vieima. The Viennese outbreak in its B«Hni««*«
turn gave irresistible force to the Hun-
garian national moTemeot. Up to the 13th of Ifarch
the Chamber of Magnates had withheld their assent
from the resolution passed by the Lower House in
^Tour of a national executive; they now accepted it
without a single hostile vote; and on the 15th a depu-
tation was sent to Vienna to lay before the Emperor an
address demanding not only the establishment of a
responsible Ministry but the freedom of the Press, trial
by jury, equality of religion, and a system of national
education. At the moment when this deputation
reached Vienna the Government was formally an-
nouncing its eompHance with the popular demand for a
Constitution for the whole of the Empire. The Hun-
garians were escorted in triumph through the streets,
and were received on the following day by the Emperor
himself, who expressed a general concurrence with the
terms of the address. The deputation returned to Pres-
burg, and the Palatine, or representative of the sove-
reign in Hungary, the Archduke Stephen, forthwith
wbose nae it dctes not ajipeu. Etch on the ontbreak of wax witli Franoe
in 1859 ba was still bnsj witb bis pen. He HorTJTed long enough to bear
ai the battle of Afagenta, but was epored the aorroir of witneesing the
cieatiou of the Kingdom of Italy. He died on the lltb of June, 1859, in
hie eightj-eereDtb year. Vettemiob was not tbe only atAt«aman present
■t the Congress of Vienna irbo lived to see the second Napoleonic Empire.
Keesdrade, the Bnasian Chanoellor, lived till 1862; Czartoryaki, who was
Foreigii IfinJstor ot Rnssia at tbe time gt tfao battle o( Ansterlitz, till
1861.
10 UODBRJf BUBOFB. Mb.
chai^cl Cottot Battbjdny, one of ttie roost popular
of the Magyar nobles, with the formation of a national
Ministry. Thus far the Diet had been in the van of
the Hungarian movement; it now sank almost into
insignificance by the side of the revolutionary organisa-
tion at Festh, where all the ardour and all the patriotism
of the Magyar race glowed in their native forc^ un-
tempered by the political experience of the statesmen
who were collected at Fresbui^, and unchecked by any
of those influences which belong to the neighbourhood
of an Imperial Court, At Festh there broke out an
agitation at once so democratic and so intensely national
that all considerations of policy and of regard ibr the
Austrian Government which might have affected the
action of the Diet were swept away before it. Kossuth,
himself the genuine representative of the capital, became
supreme. At bis bidding the Diet passed a law abolish-
ing the departments of the Central Government by
which the control of the Court over the Hungarian
body politic had beeti exercised. A list of Ministers
w^ submitted and approved, including not only
those who were needed for the transaction of domestic
business, bat Ministers of War, Finance, and Foreign
Affairs ; and in order that the entire nation might rally
round its Government, the peasantry were at one stroke
emancipated from all services attaching to the land, and
converted into free proprietors. Of the compensation
to be paid to the lords for the loss of these serrices. no
more was said than that it was a debt of honour to be
discharged by the nation.
D,a,l,zc.bvG00gIe
Within the next few days the measores thna carried
throagh the Diet bj Kossuth were presented for the
Emperor's ratification at Vienna. The fall ^B„g,^„tm
of Mettemich, important as it was, had not '"^'p™^™*
in reality produced tl^t effect upon the Austrian
Government which was expected from it by popular
opinion. The new Cabinet at Vienna was drawn from
the ranks of the official hierarchy ; and ^though some
of its members were more liberally disposed than their
late chief, tbey had ait alike passed their lives in the
traditions of the ancient system, and were far from
intending to make tbemselves the willing agents of
revolution. These men saw clearly enough that the
action of the Diet at Presburg amounted to nothing less
than the separation of Hungary from the Austrian
Empire. With the Ministries of War, Finance, and
Foreign Affairs established in independence of the cen<
tral government, there would remain no link, between
Hnngary and the Hereditary States but the person of a
titular, and, for the present time, an imbecile sovereign.
Powerless and distracted, Metternich's successors looked
in all directions for counsel. . The Palatine argued that
three courses were open to the Austrian Government
It might endeavour to crush the Hungarian movement
by force of arms ; for this purpose, however, the troops
available were insufficient -. or it might withdraw from
the country altogether, leaving the peasants to attack
the nobles, as they had done in Galicia; this was a
dishonourable policy, and the action of the Diet had,
moreover, secured to the peasant everything that he
12 MODSBN BUROPB. mu
could gain by a social iosurrectioQ : or finally, the
Government might yield for the moment to the inevit-
able, make terms with Batthydoy's Ministry, and
qoietly prepare for vigorous resistance when opportunity
should arrive. The last method was that which the
Palatine recommended ; the Court inclined in the same
direction, but it was unwilling to submit without
making some further trial of the temper of its an-
tagonists. A rescript was accordingly sent to Presburg,
announcing that the Ministry formed by Count Batthy-
dny was accepted by the Emperor, but that the central
offices which the Diet had abolished must be preserved,
and the functions of the Ministers of 'War and Finance
be reduced to those of chiefs of dep^tments, dependent
on the orders of a higher authority at Vienna. From
the delay that had taken place in the despatch of tbia
answer the nationalist leaders at Pesth and at Presbnrg
had augured no good result. Its publication brought
the country to the verge of armed revolt. Batthydny
refused to accept office under the conditions named ;
the Palatine himself declared that he could remain in
Hungary no longer. Terrified at the result of its own
challenge, the Court now withdrew from the position
that it had taken up, and accepted the scheme of the
Diet in its integrity, stipulating only that the disposal
of the army outside Hungary in time of war, and the
appointment to the higher commands, should remain _
■ with the Imperial Government.*
* AdlerBteio, AicbiT des tTiigftriBeheii UuiiateriiUDa, L 27 ; liiaji at
(Ihaaain, i. 184; Springer.il 219.
Hangory had thus made good its position as an
independent State connected with Austria only through
the person of its monarch. Vast and mo- ^tj_,„
mentons as was the change, fatal as it ''^*'
might well appear to those who could conceive of no
unity but the unity of a central govemmeat, the victory
of the M^yars appears to have excited no feeling among
the German Liberals at Vienna but one of satisfaction.
So odious, so detested, was the fallen system of despot-
ism, that every victory won by its adversaries was hailed
as a triumph of the good cause, be the remoter issues
what they might. Even where a powerful German
element, such as did not exist in Hungary itself, was
threatened by the assertion of provincial claims, the
Government could not hope for the support of the
capital if it should offer resistance. The example of
the Ms^yars was speedily followed by the Czechs in
Bohemia, Foi^otten and obliterated among the nation-
alities of Europe, the Czechs had preserved in their
language, and In that almost alone, the emblem of
their national independence. Within the borders of
Bohemia there was so large a German population that
the ultimate absorption of the Slavic element by this
wealthier and privil^ed body had at an earlier time
seemed not unlikely. Since 1830, however, the Czech
national movement had been gradually gaining ground.
In the first days of the agitation of 1848 an effort had
been made to impress a purely constitutional form upon
the demands made in the name of the people of Prague,
and so to render the union of all classes possible. This
U MODSBN SUEOPB. urn.
policj, howeTer, received its death<blow ^m the Bevo-
lution in Vienna and from the victory of the Magyars.
The leadership at Prague passed from men of posiiion
and experience, representing rather the intelligence of
the Gernion element in Bohemia than the patriotism of
the Czechs, to the nationalist orators who commanded
the streets. An attempt made by the Cabinet at
Vienna to evade the demands drawn up under the
influence of the more moderate politicians resulted only
in the downfall of this party, and in the tender of a new
series of demands of far more revolutionary character.
The population of Prague were beginning to organise a
national guard; arms were being distributed'; authority
had collapsed. The Government was now forced to con-
ADtonomr ^^^ ^ everything that was asked of it, and a .
'™°^' legislative Assembly with an independent
local administration was promised to Poliemia. To this
Assembly, as soon as it should meet, the new institu-
tions of the kingdom were to be submitted.
Thus far, if the authority of the Court of Vienna
had been virtually shaken off by a great part of its sub-
jects, the Emperor had at least not seen these subjects in
avowed rebellion against the House of Hapsburg, nor
supported in their resistance by the arms of a foreign
Power. South of the Alps the dynastic connection was
openly severed, and the rule of Austria declared for ever
at an end. Lombardy had since the beginning of the
year 1848 been held in check only by the display of
great military force. The Eevolution at Paris had
excited both hopes and fears ; the Bevolutiou at Vienna
was instanily followed bj revolt in Milan. Radetzkj,
the Austrian commander, a veteran who had served
with hoDOQJ in every campaign since that
against the Turks in 178S, had lonef fore- Lomtudr,
seen the approach of an armed conflict;
yet when the actual crisis arrived his dispositions had
not been made for meeting it. The troops in Milan
were ill placed ; the offices of Government were more-
over separated by half the breadth of the city from the
military head-quarters. Thus when on the 18th of
Marcb the insurrection broke out, it carried everything
before it. The Vice-Qovemor, O'Donell, was captured,
and compelled to sign his name to decrees handing over
the government of the city to the Municipal Council.
Radetzky now threw his soldiers upon the barricades,
and penetrated to the centre of the city ; but he was
unable to maintain himself there under the ceaseless
fire from the windows and the housetops, and withdrew
on the night of the I9th to the line of fortifications.
Fighting continued during the next two days in the
outskirts and at the gates of the city. The garrisons of
all the neighbouring towns were summoned to the
assistance of their general, but the Italians broke up
the bridges and roads, and one detachment alone out of
all the troops in Lombardy succeeded in reaching Milan.
A report now arrived at Badetzky's camp that the
King of Piedmont was on the march against him.
Preferring the loss of Milan to the possible captui'e of
his army, he determined to evacuate the city. On the
night of the 23nd of March the retreat was begun, and
16 KODSRir SVSOPB. an
BadetzVy fell ba«k upon the Mincio and TeroDa, which
he himself had made the centre of the Austrian system
of defence in Upper Italy.*
Venice had already followed the example of the
Lombard capital. The tidiaga received from Vienna
after the 13th of March appear to have completely
bewildered both the military and the civil authorities
iDmmiition oi '^^ ^^® Adriatic coast. They released
their political prisoners, among whom was
Daniel Manin, an able and determined foe of Austria;
they entered into constitutional discussions with the
popular leaders ; they permitted the formation of a
national guard, and finally handed over to this
guard the arsenals and the dockyards with all their
stores. From this time all was over. Manin pro-
claimed the Bepublic of St. Mark, and became the chief
of a Provisional Government. The Italian regiments
in garrison joined the national cause ; the ships of war
at Pola, maiined chiefly by Italian sailors, were only
prevented from sailing to the assistance of the rebels by
batteries that were levelled gainst them from the
shore. Thus without a blow being struck Venice was
lost to Austria. The insurrection spread westwards
and northwards through city and village in the in-
terior, till there remained to Austria nothing but the
fortresses on the Adige and the Mincio, where Radetzky,
deaf to the counsels of timidity, held bis ground
* Oaaati, Naove BiTelftzioni, ii. 72. SchonlialB, Cunpag^nea ditalie
de 1848 et 1849, p. 72. Gattaaea, Insnrresione di MUno, p. 29. Pari.
Faji. 1S4Q, Ivii ^) 210, 333. Schneidawind, FeldKog in 1848, i. 30.
Mft PTEDUOm itAKSB WAS. 17
tmshaken. The Dational rising carried Piedmont with it.
It was in vain that the British envoy at Turin mged
the King to enter into no conflict with H^mort^ta
Anstria. On the 24th of March Charles **^
Albert published a proclamation prontising his help to
the liombards. Two days later his troops entered
Milan*
A^nstria had for thirty years consistently laid down
the principle that its own sovereignty io Upper Italy
vested it with the right to control the poll-
tical system of every other State in the SlSS.^'iS^
peninsula. It had twice enforced this prin-
ciple hy arms: first in its intervention in Naples in
1820, aflerwa^s in its occupation of the Eoman States
in 1831. The Goveniment of Vienna had, as it were
with fixed intention, made it impossible that its pre-
sence in any part of Italy should be regarded as the
presence of an ordinary neighbour, entitled to quiet
possession until some new provocation should be given.
The Italians would have proved themselves the simplest
of mankind if, having any reasonable hope of military
snecesB, they had listened to the counsels of Palmerston
and other statesmen who ni^d them not to take
advantage of the difficulties in which Austria was now
placed. The paralysis of the Austrian State was
indeed the one onanswerable argument for immediate
war. So long ss the Emperor retained his ascendency
• Vxcan, Boenmeoto Uas^ L 106. Ferlbach, Uanin, p. 14. Oon-
tarini, Ifemoiiale Teneto, p. 10. Borani, Hanin, p. 25. Farlumeutaty
F»P«M, 1849, Mi. (2) 267.
18 Movasist mmova. ih&
in any part of Italy, his interests conid not permanently
Rufier the independence of the rest. If the Italians
should chiT^ousIy wait until the Cabinet of Vienna
had recovered its strength, it was quite certain that
their next efforts in the cause of internal liberty would
be as ruthlessly crushed as their last. Every clear-
sighted patriot understood that the time for a great
. national effort had arrived. In some respects the poli-
tical condition of Italy seemed favourable to such united
action. Since the insurrection of Palermo in January,
1848, absolutism had everywhere fallen. Ministries
had come into existence containing at least a fair pro-
portion of men who were in real sympathy with the
national feeling. Above all, the Pope seemed disposed
to place himself at the head of a patriotic union against
the foreigner. Thus, whatever might be the secret
inclinations of the reigning Houses, they were unable
for the moment to resist the call to arms. Without an
actual declaration of war troops were sent northwards
from Naples, from Florence, and from Kome, to take
part, as it was supposed, in the national struggle by the
side of the King of Piedmont. Volunteers thronged to
the standards. The Papal benediction seemed for once
to rest on the cause of manhood and independence. On
the other hand, the very impetus which had brought
Liberal Ministries into power threatened to pass into a
phase of violeuce and disorder. The coDcessions already
made were mocked by men who expected to win all the
victories of democracy in an hour. It remained to be
seen whether there existed in Italy the political sagacity
which, trinmpliing over aH local jealousies, conlcl bend
to one great aim the passions of the mnltitnde and the
fears of the Courts, or whether the cause oE the whole
nation would he wrecked in an ignohle strife betweoi
demagogues and reactionists, between the rabble of the
street and the camarilla round the throne.*
Austria had with one hand held down Italy, with
the other it had weighed on Germany. Though the
Bevolationary movement was in full course on the east
of the Ehine before Mettemich's fall, it received, espe-
cially at Berlin, a great impetus from this ni.ii»«haM»
event. Since the beginning of March the •*b«uii.
Prussian capital had worn an nnwonted aspect. In this
city of military discipline public meetings had been
held day after day, and the streets had been blocked by
excited crowds. Deputations which laid before the
King demands similar to those now made in every
German town received halting and evasive answers.
Excitement increased, and on the 13th of March en-
counters began between the citizens and the troops,
which, though insignificant, served to exasperate the
people and its leaders. The King appeared to be
wavering between resistance and concession until the
Bevolntion at Vienna, which became known at Berlin
on the 15th of March, brought afbirs to their crisis.
On the 17th the tumult in the streets suddenly ceased;
it was understood that the following day would see the
Government either reconciled with the people or forced
* BUneU, DiploBualA EnropM, r. 183. Farinl, Stato BomuMv IL 16.
FkrL FApeni, 1819, IviL 285, 297, 319. Puolini. ISamoria. ^ 9L,,,^,|J
c i
fl> XOBSBN BVBOPn. IM
to deal with an insurrection on a great scale. Accord-
ingly on the morning of the 18th crowds made their
way towards the palace, which was snrroanded hj
troops. About midday there appeared a Koyal edict
summoning the Prussian United Diet for the 2nd o£
April, and announcing that the King had determined
to promote the creation of a Parliament for all Ger-
many and the establishment of Constitutional Qovem-
raent in every German State. This manifesto drew
fresh masses towards the palace, desirous, it would seem,
to express their satisfaction ; its contents, however, were
imperfectly understood by the assembly already in front
of the p^ace, which the King vainly attempted to
address. When called upon to disperse, the multitude
refused to do so, and answered by cries for the with-
drawal of the soldiery. In the midst of the confusion
two shots were fired from the ranks without orders; a
panic followed, in which, for no known reason, the
cavalry and infantry threw themselves upon the people.
The crowd was immediately put to flight, but the
combat was taken up by the population of Berlin.
Barricades appeared in the streets ; fighting continued
during the evening and night. Meanwhile the King,
who was shocked and distressed at the course that
events had taken, received deputations hogging that
the troops might be withdrawn from the city. Frederick
WiUiam endeavoured for a while to make the surrender
of the barricades the condition for an armistice ; but as
niglit went on the troops became exhausted, and
although they had gained ground, the resistance of the
people was not overcome. Whether doubtful of the
ultimate issue of the conflict or unwilling to permit
further bloodshed, the King gave way, and at daybreak
on the 19th ordered the troops to be withdrawn. His
intention was that they should continae to garrison tUe
palace, but the order was misunderBtood, and the troops
were removed to the outside of Berlin. The palace
was thus left unprotected, and, although no injury was
inflicted upon its inmates, the King was made to feel
thai the people could now command his homage. The
bodies of the dead were brought into the court of the
palace ; their wounds were laid bare, and the King,
who appeared in a balcony, was compelled to descend
into the court, and to stand before them with uncovered
head. Definite political expression waa given to the
changed state of aflairs by the appointment of a new
Ministry.*
The conflict between the troops and the people at
Berlin was described, and with truth, as the result of a
misunderstanding. Frederick William had already de-
termined to yield to the principal demands of his
subjects ; nor ou the part of the inhabitants of Berlin
had there existed any general hostility towards the
sovereign, although a small group of f^tators, in part
foreign, bad probably sought to bring about an armed
attack on the throne. Accordingly, when once the
• Die BerliiieT Mara-Berolatjoii, p. 55. Aoafiairlicho BeschrrilniDg,
p. 3. Amtliclie Berichte, p. 16. SUhr, Preasidsclie ReTolntioti, i. 91. S.
Stem, Qeechichte dee Dentaohen Volken, p. 58. Stem was ui eye- witness
■iBeiiiD, Ubongli not genenllj a good anthoritj, ' )(f Ic
22 UODERN EUROPE. vm.
combat was broken off, there seemed to be no important
obstacle to a reconciliation between the Kiog and the
people. Frederick William chose a courge which spared
and even gratified his own self-love. In the political
faith of all German Liberals the establishment of
German unity was now an even more important article
than the introduction of free institutions into each
particular State. The Revolution at Berlin had indeed
been occasioned by the King's delay in granting internal
reform ; but these domestic disputes might well be for-
gotten if in the great cause of German unity the
Prussians saw their King rising to the needs of the
hour. Accordingly the first resolution of Frederick
William, after quiet had returned to the capital, was to
appear in public state as the champion of the Father-
land. A proclamation announced on the morning of
the 2lst of March that the King bad placed himself at
the head of the German nation, and that he would on
that day appear on horseback wearing the old German
colours. In due time Frederick William came forth at
the head of a procession, wearing the tricolor of gold,
white, and black, which since 1815 had been so dear
to the patriots and so odious to the Governments of
Germany. As he passed through the streets he was
saluted as Emperor, but he repudiated the title, assert-
ing with oaths and imprecations that he intended to
rob no German prince of his sovereignty. At each
stage of his theatrical progress he repeated to appro-
priate auditors bis sounding but ambiguous allusions
to the duties imposed upon him by the common danger.
IM fREVSniOK WILLIAU IT. S3
A manifesto, published at the close of the day, summed
up the uttemnces of the monarch in a somewliat less
rhetorical form. " Germany is in ferment within, and
exposed from without to danger from more than one
side. Deliverance from this danger can come only from
the most intimate union of the German princes and
people under a single leadership. I take this leadership
upon me for the hour of peril. I have to-day assumed
the old German colours, and placed myself and my
people under the venerable banner of the German
Empire. Prussia henceforth is merged in Germany."*
The ride of the King through Berlin, and his
assamption of the character of German leader, however
little it pleased the minor sovereigns, or gratified the
Liberals of the smaller States, who con- KiHoMiAmp*.
sidered that such authority ought to be "tp™"'~*
conferred by the nation, not assumed by a prince, was
successfnl for the moment in restoring to the King
some popularity among his own subjects. He could
now without humiiiation proceed with the concessions
which had been interrupted by the tn^ical events of
the 18th of March. In answer to a deputation from
Breslau, which niged that the Chamber formed by the
nnion of the Provincial Diets should be replaced by a
Constituent Assembly, the King promised that a
national Representative Assembly should be convoked
as soon as the United Diet had passed the necessary
* * Frenssen geht forUn in Dentscliland auf ." Beden Frieilriflh
Willialini, p. 9, In coareraation witli BasaormHnn Prederick William at
k later time described his ride through Berlin ae " a comedy which ho
Ind been made to pUj." The IxHnbwt at any rata was all Ua own.
a& VOVERlf EUROPS. KM.
electoral law. To this National Assembly the Govem-
ment would submit measures securing the liberty of the
individual, the right of public meeting and of associa-
tions, trial by jury, the responsibility of Ministers, and
the independence of the judicature. A civic militia was
to be formed, with the right of choosing its own
officers, and the standing army was to take the oath of
allegiance to the Constitution. Hereditary jurisdictions
and manorial rights of police were to be abolished ;
equality before the law was to be universally enforced ;
in short the entire scheme of reforms demanded by the
Constitutional Liberals of Prussia was to be carried
into effect. In Berlin, as in every other capital in Ger-
many, the victory of the party of progress now seemed
to be assured. The Government no longer represented
a power hostile to popular rights ; and when, on the
22nd of March, the King spontaneously paid the last
honours to those who had fallen in combat with his
troops, as the long funeral procession passed his palace,
it was generally believed that his expression of feeling
was sincere.
In the passi^ of his address in which King Fre-
derick "William spoke of the external dangers threaten-
ing Germany, he referred to npprehensions which had
for a while been current that the second French Eepub-
lic would revive the aggressive eneigy of the first. This
fear proved baseless ; nevertheless, for a sovereign who
really intended to act as the champion of the German
nation at large, the probability of war with a neigh-
bouring Power wafi far from remote. The cause of the
BOBLBSwia-nozaTsm. »
Dachies of Sohleswig-Holstein, which were in rebellion
against the Danish Crown, excited the utmost interest
and Bympathj in Germany. The popala- eMtnrim.
tion of these provinces, with the exception »*«*>-
of certain districts in Scbleswig, was German ; Holstein
was actnally a member of the Gemiiin Federation. Tlie
legal rehition of the Duchies to Denmark was, according
to the popular view, very nearly that of Hanover to
England before 1837. The King of Denmark was also
Dnke of Scbleswig and of Holatein, but these were no
more an integral portion of the Danish State than
Hanover was of the British Empire ; and the laws of
succession were moreover different, in Sohleswig-Holstein
the Crown being transmitted by males, while in Denmark
females were capable of snccession. On the part of the
Danes it was admitted that in certain districts in
Holstein the Salic law held good ; it was, however,
maintained that in the remainder of Uolstein aiid in aU
Schleswig the rules of succession were the same as in
Denmark. The Danish Government denied that Sohles-
wig-Holstein formed a unity in itself, as alleged by the
Germans, and that it possessed separate national rights
as ' ^painst the authority of the King's Goveramcnt at
Copenh^en. The real heart of the difficulty lay in the
fact that the population of the Duchies was German.
So long as the Germ^is as a race possessed no national
feeling, the union of the Duchies with the Danish
Monarchy had not been felt as a grievance. It hap-
pened, however, that the great revival of German
patriotism resulting from the War of Liberation in
M XOBERN EUBOFB. tSM.
1813 was almost BimultaQeoUB wiib the severance of
Norway from the Danish Crown, which compelled the
(JoTernment of Copenhagea to increase very heavily the
hurdens imposed on its German subjects in the Duchies.
From this time discontent gained ground, especially in
Altona and Kiel, where society was as thoroughly
German as in the neighbouring city of Hamburg.
After 1830, when Provincial Estates were established
in Schleawig and Holstein, the Gorman movement
became formidable. The reaction, however, which
marked the succeeding period generally in Europe
prevailed in Denmark too, and it was not until 1844,
when a posthumous work of Lornsen, the exiled leader
of the German party, vindicated the historical rights
of the Duchies, that the claims of German nationality
in these provinces were ^ain vigorously urged. From
this time the separation of Schles wig- Holstein from
Denmark became a question of practical politics. The
King of Denmark, Christian VIII., had but one son,
who, though long married, was childless, and with
whom the male line of the reigoing House would
expire. Id answer to an address of the Danish Pro-
vincial Estates calling upon the King to declare the
unity of the Monarchy and the validity of the Danish
law of Bucce^ssion for all its parts, the Holstein Estates
passed a resolution in November, 1844, that the Duchies
were an independent body, governed by the rule of male
descent, and indivisible. After an interval of two years,
daring which a Commission examined the succession-
laws, King Christian published a declaration that .Uie
MB. SOHLBSWia-EOISTEZN. 87
HDccessioD was the same in Schleswig as in Denmark
proper, and that, as regarded those parts of Holstein
where a different mle of saccession existed, he would
spare no effort to maintain the unity of the Monarchy.
On this the Provincial Estates both of Schleswig and of
Holstein addressed protests to the King, who refused to
accept them. The deputies now resigoed in a mass,
whilst OD behalf of Holstein an appeal was made to the
German Federal Diet. The Diet merely replied by a
declaration of rights; hut in Germany at large the
keenest interest was aroused on behalf of these severed
members of the race who were so resolutely struggling
against incorporation with a foreign Power. The
deputies themselves, passing from village to village,
excited a strenuous spirit of resistance throughout the
Duchies, which was met by the Danish Government
with measures of repression more severe than any which
it had hitherto employed.*
Such was the situation of affairs when, on the 20th
of January, 1848, King Christian VIII. died, leaving
the throne to Frederick VII., the last of
the male line of his House. Frederick's gj^
first act was to publish the draft of a Con-
stitution, in which all parts of the Monarchy were
treated as on the same footing. Before the delegates
coold assemble to whom the completion of this
work was referred, the shock of the Paris Kevolution
* Drayaen and Stxawer, SchlMvrlg- Holstein, p. 220. Bnnaen, Hem<4i
on Schloswig'-Holstein, p. 25. Seblos wig- Holstein, Uebcrsicbtliehe D>r>
8t«lliing, p. 5L On the other dde, Notea car Beleimklung, p. 12.
K MODERN EUSOPS. am.
reached the North Sea ports. A public meeting at
Altona demanded the establishment of a separate con-
stitution for Schleswig-Holstein, and the admissiqn of
Scbleswig into the German Federation. The Pro-
vincial Estates accepted this resolution, and sent a
deputation to Copenliagen to present this and other
demands to the Kiag. But in the course of the next
few days a popular movement at Copenhagen brought
into power a thoroughly Danish Ministry, pledged to the
incorporation of Schleswig with Denmark as au integral
part of the Kingdom. Without waiting to learn the
answer made by the King to the deputation, the Hol-
steiners now took affairs into their own hands. A
Provisional Government was formed at Kiel (March
24), the troops joined the people, and the insurrection
instantly spread over the whole province. As the
proposal to change the law of succession to the throne
had originated with the King of Denmark, the cause
of the Holsteiners was from one point of view that of
established right. The King of Prussia, accepting the
positions laid down by the Holstein Estates in 1844,
declared that he would defend the claims of the legiti-
mate heir by force of arms, and ordered his troops to
enter Holstein. The Diet of Frankfort, now forced to
express the universal will of Germany, demanded that
Schleswig, as the sister State of Holtitein,
should enter the Federation. On the pass-
ing of this resolution, the envoy who re-
presented the King of Denmark at the Diet, as Duke
of Holstein, quitted Frankfort, and a state of war
IMl TffB JJTTB-PJItLIAWBST. »
eosned between Denmark on the one side and Frassia
with the German Federation on the other.
The passionate impulse of the German people to-
wards unity had already called into heing an organ for
the expression of national sentiment, which, if without
any legal or constitutional authority, was ri-o-rniiiii
yet strong enough to impose its will upon ^!J^£S
the old and discredited Federal Diet and
upon most of the Burriving Governments. At the
invitation of a Committee, about five hundred Liberals
who had in one form or another taken part in public
affairs assembled at Frankfort on the 30th of March to
make the necessary preparations for the meeting of a
German national Parliament. This Assembly, which
is known as the Ante-Parliament, sat but for five days.
Its resolutions, so far as regarded the method of electing
the new Parliament, and the inclusion of new districts in
the GermMSi Federation, were accepted by the Diet, and
in the main carried into effect Its denunciation of
persons concerned in the repressive measures of 1819
and subsequent reactionary epochs was followed by the
immediate retirement of all members of the Diet whose
careers dated back to those detested days. But in the
most important work that was expected from the Ante-
Parliament, the settlement of a draft-Constitution to be
laid before the future National Assembly as a basis for
its deliberationB, nothing whatever was accomplished.
The debates that took place Srom the Slst of March to
the 4th of April were little more than a trial of strength
between the Monarchical and Republican parties. The
so MODERN EUROPB. ms.
Republicans, far outnumbered when tbey submitted a
constitutional scheme of their own, proposed, after this
repulse, that the existing Assembly should continue in
session until the National Furliamcnt met; in other
words, that it should take upon itself the functions and
character of a National Convention, Defeated also on
this proposal, the leaders of the extreme section of the
Repoblican party, strangely miscalculating their real
strength, detennined on armed insurrection. Uniting
with a body of German refugees beyond the Rhine, who
were themselves assisted by French and Polish soldiers
Re ibiinin "^ revolution, tbey raised the Republican
■uiiBiuB<id«n. standard in Baden, and for a few days
maintained a hopeless and inglorious struggle against
the troops which were sent to suppress them. Even in
Baden, which had long been in advance of all other
German States in democratic sentiment, and which was
peculiarly open to Republican influences from France
and Switzerland, the movement was not seriously sup-
ported by the population, and in the remainder of
Germany it received no countenance whatever. The
leaders found themselves ruined men. The best of
them fled to the United States, where, in the great
struggle against slavery thirteen years later, they ren-
dered better service to their adopted than they had ever
rendered to their natural Fatherland.
On breaking up on the 4th of April, the Ante-Par-
liament left behind it a Committee of Fifty, whose task
it was to continue the work of preparation for the
National Assembly to which it had itself contributed so
urn. OEBMAN NATIONAL ASSEMBLY. SI
little. One thing alone had been clearly established,
that the future CJonstitution of Germany
was not to be Republican. That the SSSSia.m«.
existing GoTerumeDts could not be safely
ignored by the Natiunal Assembly in its work of
founding the new Federal Constitution for Germany
was clear to those who were not blinded by the enthu-
siasm of the moment. In the Committee of Fifty and
elsewhere plans were suggested for giving to the
Governments a representation within the Constituent
Assembly, or for uniting their representatives in a
Chamber co-ordinate with this, so that each step in the
construction of the new Federal order should be at once
the work of the nation and of the Governments. Such
plans were suggested and discussed ; but in the haste
and inexperience of the time they were brought to no
conclusion. The opening of the National Assembly
had been fixed for the 18th of May, and this brief
interval had expired before tlie few sagacious men who
understood the necessity of co-operation between the
Governments and the Parliament had decided upon any
common course of action. To the mass of patriots it
was enough that Germany, after thirty years of disap-
pointment, had at last won its national representation.
Before this imposing image of the united race. Kings,
Courts, and armies, it was fondly thought, must how.
Thus, in the midst of univer.sal hope, the elections were
held throughout Germany in its utmost federal extent,
from the Baltic to the Italian border ; Bohemia alone,
where the Czech majority resisted any closer union with
82 MODERN EUEOPS. ISO.
Germany, declining to send representatives to Frankfort.
In the body of deputies elected there were to be found
almost all the foremost Liberal politicians o£ every
German community; a few still vigorous champions of
the time of the War of Liberation, chief among them
the poet Amdt; patriots who in the evil days that
followed bad suffered imprisonment and exile ; his-
torians, professors, critics, who in the sacred cause of
liberty have, like Gervinus, inflicted upon their readers
worse miseries than ever they themselves endured at the
hands of unregenerate kings; theologians, journalists;
m short, the whole group of leaders under whom
Germany expected to enter into the promised land of
national unity and freedom. No Imperial coronation
ever brought to Frankfort so many honoured guests, or
attracted to the same degree the sympathy of the
German race. Greeted with the cheers of the citizens
of Frankfort, whose civic militia lined the streets, the
members of the Assembly marched in procession on the
afternoon of the 18th of May from the ancient ban-
queting-hall of the Kaisers, where they had gathered,
to the Church of St. Paul, which had been chosen aa
their Senate House. Their President and officers were
elected on the following day. Amdt, who in the frantic
confusion of the first meeting had been unrecognised
and shouted down, was called into the Tribune, but
could speak only a few words for tears. The Assembly
voted him its thanks for bis famous song, "What is
the German's Fatherland ? " and requested that he
would add to it another stanza commemorating the
am. PBUSSIAN NATIONAL PA<AMBNT. 38
Qnion of the race at length visibly realised in that great
Parliament. Fonr days after the opening of the General
Assembly of Frankfort, the Prussian national Parlia-
ment began its sessions at Berlin.*
At this point the first act in the Revolutionary
drama of 1848 in Germany, as in Europe generally,
may be considered to have reached its close.
A certain anity marks the memorable epoch ^j'^iSIX
known generally as the March Days and
the events immediately succeediug. Bevolutioa is
universal ; it scarcely meets with resistance ; its views
seem on the point of being achieved ; the baffled aspira-
tions of the last half-century seem on the point of
being fulfilled. There exists no longer in Central
Europe sach a thing as an autocratic Government; and,
while the French Eepublic maintains an unexpected
attitude of peace, Germany and Italy, under the leader-
ship of old dynasties now penetrated with a new spirit,
appear to be on the point of achieving each its own
work of Federal union and of the expulsion of the
foreigner from its national soil. All Italy prepares
to move under Charles Albert to force the Austrians
from their last strongholds on the Mincio and the
Adige; all Germany is with the troops of Frederick
William of Prussia as they enter Holhtein to rescue
this and the neighbouring German province from the
Bane. In Badetzky's camp alone, and at the Court of
8t. Petersburg, the old monarchical order of Europe
* TerluHuUimgeii Afs Nftti<mal-Teraammlai]^ L 2B. Biedemiuiii
Drrismg Jakre, i. 27& Bodowit^ Werke, U. 36.
^ L ,„z..bvGoogIe
M MODERN EUROPB. im
still Bomves. How powerful were these two isolated
centres of anti-popular energy the world was soon to
see. Yet they would not have turned back the tide of
European affairs and given one more victory to reac-
tion had they not had their allies in the hatred of
race to ra«e, in the incapacity and the errors of peoples
and those who represented them ; above all, in the
enormous difiQculties which, even had the generation
been one of sages and martyrs, the political circum-
stances of the time would in themselves have opposed
to the accomplishment o£ the ends desired.
France had given to Central Europe the signal for
the Kevolution of 1848, and it was in France, where
the conflict was not one for national independence but
for political and social interests, that the Bevolution
most rapidly ran its course and first exhausted its
powers. On the flight of Louis Philippe authority
had been entrusted by the Chamber of Deputies
to a Provisional Government, whose most prominent
member was the orator and poet Lamartine. Installed
at the H6tel de Ville, tliis Government had
substituting the Bed Flag for the Tricolor,
and from proceeding at once to realise the plans of its
own leaders. The majority of the Provisional Govern-
ment were llepublicans of a moderate type, representing
the ideas of the urban middle classes rather than those
of the workmen ; but by their side were Ledru RoUin,
a rhetorician dominated by the phrases of 1793, and
Louis Blanc, who considered all political change
B8 bat an instrument for advancing tbe OTgaoisatioD
of laboor and for the emancipatioa of the artis^i from
servitude, hy the establishiaeat of State-directed indus-
tries affording appropriate employment and adequate
remancration to all. Among the first proclamations of
the Provisional Government was one in which, in
answer to a petition demanding the recognition oE the
Right to Labour, they undertook to guarantee employ-
ment to every citizen. This engagement, the heaviest
perhaps that was ever voluntarily assumed by any
Government, was, followed in a few days by the opening
of national workshops. That in the midst of a Revolu-
tion which took all parties by surprise plans for the
conduct of a series of industrial enterprises by the State
should have heett seriously examined was impossible.
The Government had paid homage to an abstract idea ;
they were without a conception of the mode in which it
was to be realised. What articles were to be made,
what works were to be executed, no one knew. The
mere direction of destitute workmen to the centres
where they were to be employed was a task for which a
new branch of the administration had to be created.
When this was achieved, the inen collected proved
useless for all purposes of industry. Their .^^ NaUood
numbers increased enormously, rising in the ^"^""""i*
course of four weeks from fourteen to sixty-five thousand.
The Revolution had itself caused a financial and com-
mercial panic, interrupting all the ordinary occupations
of business, and depriving masses of men of the means
of earning a livelihood. These, with others who had
j> 2 '"^^ "
as MODERN EUBOFS. wm.
no intention of working, thronged to the State work-
shops ; while the certainty of obtaining wages from the
public purse occasioned a series of strikes of workmen
against their employers and the abandonment of private
factories. The, checks which had been intended to
confine enrolment at the.public works to persons already
domiciled in Paris completely failed; from all the
neighbouring departments the idle and the hungry
streamed into the capital. Every abuse incidental to a
system of public relief was present in Paris in its most
exaggerated form ; every element of experience, of
wisdom, of precaution, was absent. If, instead of a
group of benevolent theorists, the experiment of 1848
had had for its authors a company of millionaires anxious
to dispel all hope that mankind might ever rise to a
higher order than that of unrestricted competition of
man against man, it could not have been conducted
under more fatal conditions.*
The leaders of the democmcy in Paris had from the
first considered that the decision upon the form of
_ „ , . , Government to be established in Trance
Tha ProTlaiHul
QoTwmientijM jjj place of the Orleanist monarchy be-
longed rather to themselves than to the
nation at large. They distrusted, and with good
reason, the results of the General Election which, by
a decree of the Provisional Government, was to be
held in the course of April. A circular issued by Ledru
* Aotes do GouTemement Frorisoire, p. 12: Ixiuis Blane, XUr^la.
tions Historiqnee, i. 13S. Gftrnier Fag^ B^rolation da 1S48, tI lOG^
viU. 148. £iDile Thomas, ECistoin ia» Ateliers NstiauMiz, p. 93.
am. LEDRU ROLLW. 87
HoUin, Minister of the Interior, without the knowledge
of his colleagues, to the Oommissionenj hj whom he
had replaced the Prefects of the Monarchy gave the
first open indication of this alarm, and of the means of
violence and intimidation by which the party which
Ledru BoUin represented hoped to impose its will upon
the country. The Commissioners were informed in
plain .language that, as agents of a revolutionary
authority, their powers were unlimited, and that their
task was to exclude &om election all persons who were
not animated by revolutionary spirit, and pure from
any taint of association with the past. If the circular
had been the work of the Government, and not of a
single member of it who was at variance with most of
his colle^ues and whose words were far more formid-
able than his actions, it would have cleariy foreshadowed
a return to the system of 1793. But the isolation of
Ledru KoIIin was well understood. The attitude of
the Government generally was so little in accordance
with the views of the Bed Bepublicans that on the
16th of April a demonstration was organised with the
object of compelling them to postpone the elections.
The prompt appearance in arms of the National Guard,
which still represented the middle classes of Paris,
baffled the design of the leaders of the mob, and gave
to Lamartine and the majority in the Government a
decisive victory over their revolutionary Ejectiom,
colleague. The elections were held at the *'^**'
time appointed ; and, in spite of the institution of
universal sufirage, they resulted in the return of a body
88 MODERN EUBOFB. Utt.
of Deputies not widely different from those who had
hitherto appeared in French Parhaments. The great
majority were indeed Republicans by profession, but of
a moderate type ; and the session had no sooner opened
than it became clear that the relation between the
Socialist democracy of Paris and the Kational Repre-
sentatives could only be one of more or less violent
antagonism.
The first act of the Assembly, which met on the
4th of May, was to declare that the Provisional Govern-
ment had deserved well of the country, and
to reinstate most of its members in office
under the title of an Executive Commis-
sion. Ledru RoUin'e offences were condoned, as those
of a man popular with the democracy, and likely on the
whole to yield to the influence of his colleagues. Louis
Blanc and his confederate, Albert, as really dangerous
persons, were excluded. The Jacobin leaders now
proceeded to organise an attack on the Assembly by
main force. On the 15th of May the attempt was
made. Under pretence of tenderiug a peti-
' tion on behalf of Poland, a mob invaded
the Legislative Chamber, declared the Assembly dis-
solved, and put the Deputies to flight. But the
triumph was of short duration. The National Guard,
whose commander alone was responsible for the failure
of measures of defence, soon rallied in force; the leaders
of the insurgents, some of whom had installed them-
selves as a Provisional Government at the H6tel de
Ville, were made captive ; and after an interval of a
IM THE NATIONAL W0&K3S0PB. »
few honrs the Assembly resumed possession of the
Palais Bourboa. The (lishonour done to the aational
representation by the scandalous scenes of the 15th of
May, as well as the decisively proved superiority of the
National Guard over the half-anned mob, encouraged
the Assembly to declare open war against the so-called
social democracy, and to decree the abolition
of the national workshops. The enormous JSaSSdWak.
growth of these establishments, which now
included over a hundred thousand men, threatened to
rain the public finances ; the demoralisation which they
eugendered seemed likely to destroy whatever was soand
in the life of the working classes of Paris. Of honest
industry there was scarcely a trace to he found among
the masses who were receiving their daily w^es
from the State. Whatever the sincerity of those who
had founded the national workshops, whatever the
anxiety for employment on the part of those who first
resorted to them, they had now become mere hives of
disorder, where the resources of the State were lavished
in accumnlatiug a force for its own overthrow. It was
necessary, at whatever risk, to extinguish the evil.
Plans for the gradual dispersion of the army of work-
men were drawn up by Committees and discussed by
the Assembly. If put in force with no more than the
necessary delay, these plans might perhaps have rendered
a peaceful solution of the difficulty possible. But the
Government hesitated, and finally, when a decision
could no longer be avoided, determined upon measures
more violent and more sudden than those wlueh the
40 MOVBRN BimOPB. iM
Committees had recommended. On the 2l8t of June
an order was published that all occapants of the public
workshops between the ages of seveDteen and tweuty-
fire must enlist in the army or cease to receive support
from the State, and that the removal of the workmen
who had come into Paris from the provinces, for which
preparations had already been made, must be at once
The publication of this order was the signal for an
appeal to arms. The lemons of the uational workshops
were in themselves a half-organised force equal in
number to several army-corps, and now animated by
something like the spirit of military union. The
TiH TOUT D*i« revolt, which began on the morning of the
""'' 23rd of June, was conducted as no revolt in
Paris had ever been conducted before. The eastern
part of the city was turned into a maze of barricades.
Though the insurgents had not artillery, they were in
other respects fairly armed. The terrible nature of the
conflict impending now became evident to the Assembly.
General Cavaignac, Minister of War, was placed in
command, and subsequently invested with supreme
authority, the Executive Commission resigning its
powers. All the troops in the neighbourhood of Paris
were at once summoned to the capital. Cavaignac well
understood that any attempt to hold the insurrection in
check by means of scattered posts would only end, as in
* Bumt, H&Qoires, iL 103. Canssidiere, Mdmoices, p. 117. (Hni*K
Fftgte, X. 419. Honnajiby, Teat of Revolution, i. 389. Granier d«
GftssagnM^ Ohnte de liooia Philippe, L 359. De U Oorae, Seconds lU-
puUi^oe, i. 273. Fallonx, lUmoirea, I 3^
IM TBB rOUlt DATS Of StTSn. 41
IS30, by the capture or the demoralisation of the
troops. Se treated Paris as one great battle-field in
which the enemy mast be attacked in mass and driven
by m^n force &om all his positions. At times the
effort appeared almost beyond the power of the forces
engaged, and the insni^nts, sheltered by hnge barri-
cades and firing from tbe windows of houses, seemed
likely to remain masters of the field. The struggle
continued for four days, but Cavaignac's artillery and
the discipline of bis tmops at last crushed resistance ;
and after the Archbishop of Paris had been mortally
wounded in a heroic effort to stop farther bloodshed,
the last bands of the insurgents, driven back into the
north-eastern quarter of the city, and there attacked
witii artillery in front and flank, were forced to lay
down their arms.
Such was the conflict of the Four Days of June,
a conflict memorable as one in which the combatants
fought not for a political principle or form of Govern-
ment, but for the preservation or the overthrow
of society based on the Institution of private pro-
perty. The National Guard, with some exceptions,
fought side by side with the regiments of the line,
braved the same perils, and sustained an equal loss.
The workmen threw themselves the more passionately
into the struggle, inasmuch as defeat threatened them
with deprivation of the very means of life. On both
sides acts of savagery were committed which the
fniy of the conflict could not excuse. Tbe ven-
geance of the conquerors in the moment of success
48 MODERN EUItOPB. IMS.
appetffs, bowever, to hare been less unTeleoting than
that which followed the overthrow of the Commune in
1871, though, after the stru^le was over, the Assembly-
had no Bcraple in transporting without trial the whole
mass of prisoners taken with arms in their hands.
Cavaignac'e victory left the classes for whom he had
Ften left br the fought terror-striclten at the peril from
*"* ™*' which they had escaped, and almost hope-
less of their own security under any popular form of
Government in the future. Against the rash and weak
concessions to popular demands that had been made by
the administration since February, especially in the
matter of taxation and Bnance, there was now a deep,
if not loudly proclaimed, reaction. The national work-
shops disappeared ; grants were made by the Legislalare
for the assistance of the masses who were left without
resource, but the money was bestowed in charitable
relief or in the form of loans to associations, not as
wages from the State. On every side among the holders
of property the cry was for a return to sound principles
of finance in the economy of the State, and for the
establishment of a strong central power.
General Cavaignac after the re.-^toration of order liad
laid down the supreme authority which had been con-
ferred on him, but at the desire of the Assembly he
continued to exercise it until the new Constitution
<hnig7>HHid should be drawn up and an Executive ap-
^^™^ ' pointed in accordance with its provisions.
Events had suddenly raised Cavaignac from obscurity
to eminence, and seemed to mark him out as the fature
MK. £01775 NAPOLEON. 48
ruler of France. But he displayed during the six
months following the suppression of the revolt no great
capacity for government, and his virtues as well as his
defects made against his personal success. A sincere
Eepuhlican, while at the same time a rigid upholder of
law, he refused to lend himself to those who were,
except in name, enemies of Republicanism ; and in his
official acts and utterances he spared the feelings of the
reactionary classes as little as he would have spared
those of rioters and Socialists. As the influence of
Cavaignac declined, another name hegan to fill men's
thoughts. Louis Napoleon, son of the Emperor's
brother Louis, l^ing of Holland, had while still in
exile been elected to the National Assembly by four
Departments. He was as yet almost unknown except
by name to his fellow-countrymen. Bom in the
Tuileries in 1S08, he had been involved as a child in
the ruin of the Empire, and had passed into banish-
ment with his mother Kortense, under the law that
expelled from France all members of Napoleon's
family. He had been brought up at Augsburg and on
the shores of the Lake of Constance, and as a volunteer
in a Swiss camp of artillery he had gained some little
acquaintance with military life. In 1831 he had joined
the insurgents in the Romagoa who were in arms
against the Papal Government. The death of his own
elder brother, followed in 1832 by that of Napoleon's
son, the Duke of Beichstadt, made him chief of the
house of Bonaparte. Though far more of a recluse
than a man of action, though so little of his own nation
M MOBEUN SUSOFS. Ui*.
that he conld not pronounce a sentence of French with-
out a marked German accent, and had never even seen
a French play performed, he now became possessed by the
fixed idea that he was one day to wear the French
Crown. A few obscure adventurers attached themselves
to his fortunes, and in 183G he appeared at Strasburg
and presented himself to the troops as Emperor. The
enterprise ended in failure and ridicule. Louis Napo-
leon was shipped to America by the Orleanist Govern-
ment, which supplied him with money, and thought it
unnecessary even to bring him to trial. He recrossed
the Atlantic, made his home in England, and in 1840
repeated at Boulogne the attempt that bad failed at
Strasburg. The result was again disastrous. He was
now sentenced to perpetual imprisonment. Mid passed
the neit six years in captivity at Ham, where he
produced a treatise on the Napoleonic Ideas, and certain
fragments on political and social questions. The
enthusiasm for Napoleon, of which there had been little
trace in France since 1815, was now reviving; the
sufferings of the epoch of conquest were forgotten ; the
steady maintenance of peace by Louis Philippe seemed
humiliating to young and ardent spirits who had not
known the actual presence of the foreigner. In literature
two men of eminence worked powerfully upon the
national imagination. The history of Thiers gave the
nation a great stage-picture of Napoleon's exploits ;
Stranger's lyrics invested bis exile at St. Helena with
an irresistible, though spurious, pathos. Thus, little as
the world concerned itself with the prisoner at Ham.
18«. LOUIB NAPOLEON. 45
the tendencies of the time were working in his faroar ;
and his confinement, which lasted six years and was
tenninated hj hia escape and return to England, appears
to have deepened his hrooding nature, and to have
strengthened rather than diminished his confidence in
himself. On the overthrow of Louis Philippe he visited
Paris, but was requested by the Provisional Govern-
ment, on the ground of the unrepealed law banishing
the Bonaparte family, to quit the country. He obeyed,
probably foreseeing that the difficulties of the Republic
would create better opportunities for his reappearance.
Meanwhile the group of unknown men who sought
their fortunes in a Napoleonic restoration busily can-
vassed and wrote on behalf of the Prince, and with
such success that, in the supplementary elections that
were held at the beginning of Juik , he obtained a four-
fold triumph. The Assembly, in spite of the efforts of
the Government, pronounced his return
^ Louis Napoleoii
valid. Yet with rare self-command the t^'^^^'
Prince still adhered to his policy of reserve,
resigning his seat on the ground that hia election had
been made a pretest for movements of which he dis-
approved, while at the same time he declared in his
letter to the President of the Assembly that if duties
shoold be imposed upon him by the people he should
know how to fulfil them.*
From this time Louis' Napoleon was a recognised
aspirant to power. The Constitution of the Ecpublic
* CEorTM de Napoleon m., iii. 13, 2A. Onuiier de Csssagnu, li. 16.
Jerrold. NajMltou IH, ii. 393,
IS MODERN EUBOPS. ISM.
was now beings drawn ap by the Assembly. The
Executive Commission had disappeared in the convul-
sion of June I Cavaignac was holding the balance be-
tween parties rather than governing himself. In the
midst of the debates, on the Constitution
•^•loctoi. Louis Napoleon was again returned to the
Assembly by the votes of five Departments.
He saw that he ought to remain no longer in the
background, and, accepting the call of the electors, he took
his seat in the Chamber. It was clear that he wonld
become a candidate for the Presidency of the Bepublic,
and that the popularity of his name among the masses
was enormous. He had twice presented himself to
France as the heir to Napoleon's throne ; he had never
directly abandoned his dynastic claim ; he had but
recently declared, in almost threatening language, that
he should know how to fulfil the duties that the people
might impose upon him. Yet with all these facts
before it the Assembly, misled by the puerile rhetoric
of Lamartioe, decided that in the new Constitution the
President of the Republic, in whom was vested the
executive power, should be chosen by the direct vote of
all Frenchmen, and rejected the amendment of M.
Gr^vy, who, with real insight into the future, declared
that such direct election by the people could only give
France a Dictator, and demanded that the President
should be appointed not by the masses but by the
Chamber. Thus was the way paved for Louis Napoleon's
march to power. The events of June had dispelled any
attraction that he had hitherto felt towards Socialistie
iw XOPrS NAPOLEON, PSBSIDENT. 47
theories. He saw that France required an upholder of
order and of property. In his address to the nation an-
nouncing his candidatare for the Presidency he declared
thathe would shrink from no sacrifice in defending society,
so andacionsly attacked ; that he would devote himself
without reserve to the maintenance of the Repuhlic, and
make it his pride to leave to his successor at the end of
four years authority strengthened, liberty unimpaired,
and real progress accomplished. Behind these gener-
alities the address dexterously touched on the special
wants of classes and parties, and promised something to
each. The French nation in the election which followed
showed that it believed in Louis Napoleon even more
than he did in himself. If there existed in the opinion
of the great mass any element beyond the mere instinct
of self-defence against real or supposed schemes of spolia-
tion, it was reverence for Napoleon's memory. Out of
seven millionsof votes given, liouis Napoleon
received above five, Cavaignac, who alone eiKie^ f-^-
entered into serious competition with him, re-
ceiving about a fourth part of that number. Lamartine
and the men who ten months before had represented all
the hopes of the nation now found but a handful of
supporters. Though none yet openly spoke of Monar-
chy, on all sides there was the desire for the restoration
of power. The day-dreams of the second llopiiblic
had fled. France had shown that its choice lay only
between a soldier who had crushed rebellion and a
stranger who brought no title to its confidence but an
Imperial name. ^ ,
D,=,l,z..tvLnOOgIf
CHAPTEB n.
Auatri* uid Ilslj— Vienna from Harch to May— Fliglit of ttie Empcrar —
Bohemian NalionBl Hovement — WindiBch^;tati lubduee Pm^pie — Campugn
around Verooa — Papal Alloflution — NnplM in Maj' — Negotiationa aa to Lom-
bardy — Baconquost of Vcnetia— Battle of CugtosEa-pThe Anttrian* eDt«r
Alitan — Auatrion Court and Hungary — The Serbs ia Southern Hungary —
8erb CopgroM at Carlowit*— Jellaciu — AfEaira of Ctoatia—JeUncic, the
Coart and the Hungarian Movement — Murder of Lamberg — Manifesto of
October 3— Yiennn on October 6 — The Emperor at Olmiitz— Windiichgriti
conquers Vienna — The Piirliament at KremBier— Schwarxenberg Uinjitca^ —
Ferdinand Bbdicut<>B — Dissolution of the Krenuier Parliament — Unitary
Edict — Hungary — -The Houmanians in Transylvania — The Anstrian Army
oooupieB Pcelh — HungHrian Government at Debrecsin — The Auatriana
driven out of Hungary — Declaration of Hungarian Independence — RuBsiail
Intervention — The Huogiirian Summer Campaign — Capitulation of VitagOB
— Italy— Murder of Eossi— Tuscnny — The March Goinpaign in Iiombanly —
Noi-ara — Abdication of Charloe Albert — Victor Emmanuel — Rertoration in
Tiincany — French Intervcntiiin in Rome— Defeat of Oudinot^OudinOt and
Lw«oj»— The French entjir liomii- -The Itfistored Pontifloal Ooveroment —
Full of Venice — Ferdinand retonqutrs Sicily — Oermany — Hie National
ARscmbly at Frankfort — The Armistice of Malmii— Uerlin from April to
Seplembor — The ['ruaaian Army— Laat dayi of the Pruaaian Parliament —
Pruaaian Constitution gmnted by Edict — The German National Assembly
and Austria— Frederick William IV. elected Emperor— He refuses tha
Crown — Kudof the National Aasembly^Prusela attempts to form a eeparats
Union — The nniun Parliament nt Erfurt — Action of Austria — Hesee-Caasel
— The Diet of Frankfort rostoii d — Olmiitz — Schleairig-HolBtiiin — Germany
after 1349— Austria after ISIil— France after 1848 — Louis Hapoleon — Tha
Octobor Message — Law Limiting tlio Franchise — Louis Napoleon and tha
Army — Proposed Revision of the ConstituUon — The Coup d'etat —
N^ioleon III. EnipctOT.
The plain of Northern Italy has ever heen an arena on
which the contest between interests greater
^^^' than those of Italy itself has been brongbt
to an issue ; and it may perhaps be truly said that
ia the struggle between established Govenunenta
tm. AUSTRIA ASD ITALY. «
and Bevolution thronglioat Central £urope in 184S
the real tamiDg-point, if it can anywhere be fixed, lay
rather in the fortunes of a campaign in Lombardy than
in any single combination of events at Vienna or Berlin.
The very existence of the Austrian Monarchy depended
on the victory of Badetzky's forces over the national
movement at the head of which Piedmont had now placed
itself. If Italian independence should be established
upon the ruin of the Austrian arms, and the influence
and example of the victorious Italian people be thrown
into the scale j^ainst the Imperial Government in its
struggle with the separatist forces that convulsed every
part of the Austrian dominions, it was scarcely possible
that any stroke of fortune or policy could save the
Empire of the Hapshurga from dissolution. But on
the prostration or recovery of Austria, as represented
by its central power at Vienna, the future of Germany
in great part depended. Whatever compromise might
be effected between popular and monarchical forces in
the other German States if left free from Austria's
interference, the whole influence of a resurgent Austrian
power could not but be directed against the principles
of popular sovereignty and national union. The Par-
liament of Frankfort might then in vain affect to fulfil
its mandate without reckoning with the Court of
Vienna. All this was indeed obscured in the tempests
that for a while shut out the political horizon. The
Liberals of Northern Germany had little sympathy
with the Italian cause in the decisive days of 1848.
Their inclinations went rather with the combatant who,
60 UODBBN EVBOPB. ma.
though bent oa tnalntainiDg an oppressive dominion,
was nevertheless a memher of the German race and paid
homage for the moment to Constitutional rights. Yet,
as later events were to prove, the fetters which crushed
liberty beyond the Alps could fit as closely on to
German Hmbs ; and in the warfare of Upper Italy for
its own freedom the battle of German Liberalism was
in no small measure fought and lost.
Mettemich once banished from Vienna, the first
popular demand was for a Constitution. His successors
in office, with a certain characteristic pedantry, devoted
■vimn.(roni their studics to the Belgian Constitution of
tttnbtaibj. j^ggj _ ^^^ ^i^gj, gQjjjg weeks a Constitution
was published by edict for the non- Hungarian part of
the Empire, including a Parliament of two Chambers,
the Lower to be chosen by indirect election, the Upper
consisting of nominees of the Crown and representatives
of the great landowners. The provisions of this Con-
stitution in favour of the Crown and the Aristocracy, as
well as the arbitrary mode of its promulgation, dis-
pleased the Viennese. Agitation recommenced in the
city ; unpopular ofiicials were roughly handled ; the
Press grew ever more violent and more scurrilous.
One strange result of the tutelage In which Austrian
society had been held was that the students of the
University became, and for some time continued to be,
the most important political body of the capital. Their
principal rivals in influence were the National Guard
drawn from citizens of the middle class, the workmen
t8 yet remaining in the background. Keither in the
laa. TTSSSA. U
Hall of the ITmTeTsitj nor at the taverns where the
dvic mOitia discussed the events of the hour did the
office-drawn Constitntion find &vour. On the 13th of
May it was determined, with the view of exercising
stronger pressure upon the Q-overnment, that the exist-
ing committees of the Kational Guard and of the
students should be superseded bj one central committee
representing both bodies. The elections to this com-
mittee had been held, and its sittings had begun,' when
the commtuider of the National Guard declared such pro-
ceedings to he inconsistent with military discipline, and
ordered the dissolution of the committee. Riots followed,
during which the students and the mob made their way
into the Emperor's palace and demanded from his
Ministers not only the re-establishment of the central
committee but the abolition of the Upper Chamber in
the projected Constitution, and the removal of the
chet^s imposed on popular sovereignty by a limited
fianchise and the system of indirect elections. On
point after point the Ministry gave way ; and, in spite
of the resistance and reproaches of the Imperial house-
holdf they obtuned the Emperor's siguatore to a
document promising that for the future all the important
military posts in the oity should be held by the National
Quard jointly with the regular troops, that the latter
should never be called oat except on the requisition of
tiie National Guard, and that the projected Constitution
should remain without force until it should have been
sobmitted for confirmation to a single Constituent
Aiisembly elected by universal sufErage.
i2 L ,„..,=, Coogk-
fia MODERN SUSOFS. IM
The weakness of the Emperor's intelligence rendered
him a mere puppet in the hands of those who for the
moment exercised control oyer his actions. During the
riot of the 15th of May he obeyed his Ministers ; a few
hours afterwards he fell under the sway of the Court
party, and consented to fly from Vienna.
&BPTO, On the 18th the Viennese learnt to their
astonishment that Ferdinand was far on the
road to the Tyrol. Soon afterwards a manifesto was
published, stating that the violence and anarchy of the
capital had compelled the Emperor to transfer his
residence to Innsbruck ; that he remained true, however,
to the promises made in March and to their legitimate
consequences; and that proof must be given of the
return of the Viennese to their old sentiments of loyalty
before he could again appear among them. A certain
revulsion of feeling in the Emperor's favour now became
manifest in the capital, and emboldened the Ministers
to take the first step necessary towards obtaining his
return, namely the dissolution of the Students' Legion.
They could count with some confidence on the support
of the wealthier part of the middle class^ who were
now becoming wearied of the students' extravj^nces
and alarmed at the interruption of business caused by
the Bevolution ; moreover, the ordinary termination of
the academic year was near at hand. The order was
Tnonitof accordingly given for the dissolution of the
"''**' Legion and the closing of the University.
But the students met the order with the stoutest resist-
ance. The workmen poured in from the suburbs to
join in their defence. Barricades were erected, and the
insurrection (^ March seemed on the point of being
renewed. Once more the Government gave way, and
not only revoked its order, tint declared itself incapable
of preserving tranquillity in the capital unless it should
receive the assistance of the leaders of the people.
With the full concurrence of the Ministers, a Committee
of Public Safety was formed, representing at once the
students, the middle class, and the workmen ; and it
entered upon its duties with an authority exceeding^
within the hmits of the capital, that of the shadowy
functionaries of State.*
In the meantime the antagonism between the Czechs.
and the G-ermaus in Bohemia was daUy becoming more
bitter. The influence of the party of com-
promise, which had been dominant in the
early days of March, had disappeared before
the ill-timed attempt of the German national leaders
at Frankfort to include Bohemia within the territory
sending representatives to the German national Parlia-
ment. By consenting to this incorporation the Czech
population would have dehaitely renounced its newly
asserted claim to nationality. If the growth of demo-
cratic spirit at Vienna was accompanied by a mure
intense German national feeling in the capital, the
popular movements at Vienna and at Prague must
necessarily pass into a relation of conflict with one
• Titothnm, Wion, p. 108. Springer, ii 293. PillerHdorff, Buck-
bHoke, p. 63 ; NacU^SB, p. 118. BesdiAtier, ii 176. Dntider, October
BeTolntioD, p. 6. Kcquelnum^ Anfldarangen, ^ 65.
S4 UODESlSr BUBOPB. am.
anotter. On the flight of the Emperor becoming
known at Prague, Count Thun, the governor, who was
also the chief of the moderate Bohemian paHy, invited
Ferdinand to make Fn^jue the seat of his Government.
This invitation, which would have directly connected
the Crown with Czech national interests, was not ac-
cepted. The rasher politicians, chiefly students and
workmen, continued to hold their meetings and to patrol
the streets ; and a Congress of Slavs from all parts of
the Empire, which was opened on the 2nd of June,
excited national passions still further. So threaten-
ing grew the attitude of the btudents and workmen
that Count Windischgratz, commander of the troops at
Prague, prepared to act with artillery. On the 12th of
June, the day on which the Congress of
nMoH^ligiw, Slavs broke up, fighting began. Windisch-
gratz, whose wife was killed by a bullet,
appears to have acted with calmness, and to have
sought to arrive at some peaceful settlement. He
withdrew his troops, and desisted from a bombardment
that he had begun, on the undenitunding that the barri-
cades which had been erected should be removed. This
condition was not fulfilled. New acts of violence occurred
in the city, and on the 17th Windischgratz reopened
fire. On the following day Prague surrendered, and
Windischgratz re-entered the city aa Dictator. The
autonomy of Bohemia was at an end. The army had
for the first time acted with eifect against a popular
rising ; the . first blow had been struck on behalf of
the central power against the revolution which till
sn WAR IN NOBTHEBIT ITALT. 65
now had seemed about to dissolve the Aoatrian State
into its fr^raente.
At this point the dominant interest in Austrian
affairs passes from the capital and the northern provinces
to Badetzky's army and the Italians with whom it
stood face to face. Once convinced of the necessity of
a retreat from Milan, the Austrian com-
mander had moved with sufficient rapidity uonnd vvou,
' •' April— H^.
to save Verona and Mantua from passing
into the hands of the insurgents. He was thus enabled
to place his army in one of the best defensive positions
in Europe, the Quadrilateral flanked by the rivers
Mincio and Adige, and protecU'd by the fortresses of
Verona, Mantua, Peschiera, and Legnano. With his
front on the Mincio he awaited at once the attack of
the Piedmontese and the arrival of reinforcements from
the north-east. On the 8th of April the first attack was
made, and after a sharp engagement at Goito the pas-
sage of the Mincio was effected by the Sardinian army.
Siege was now laid to Peschiera ; and while a Tuscan
contingent watched Mantua, the bulk of Charles Albert's
forces operated farther northward with the view of cutting
off Verona from the roads to the Tyrol. This result was
for a moment achieved, but the troops at the King's
disposal were far too weak for the task of reducing the
fortresses; and in an attempt that was made on the 6th
of May to drive the Austrians out of their positions in
front of Verona, Charles Albert was defeated at Santa
Lucia and compelled to fall back towards the Mincio.*
• Sehonhals, p. U7. F«rini,a.». ParLPtp. 18*9, Wi ^^y],.
S6 UODEBN SUEOPB. iMtL
A pause in the war ensued, filled by political events
of evil omen for Italy. Of all the princes who had
permitted their troops to march northwards to the
assistance of the Lombards, not one was acting in full
sincerity. The first to show himself in his true colours
was the Pope. On the 29tb of April an Allocution
was addressed to the Cardinals, in which Pius disavowed
Bip^juioei*. *'^ participation in the war against Austria,
tion, April M. ^^^ declared that his own troops should do
no more than defend the integrity of the Koman States.
Though at the moment an outburst of popular indigna-
tion in Bome forced a still more liberal Ministry into
power, and Durando, the Papal general, continued his
advance into Venetia, the Pope's renunciation of his
supposed national leadership produced the effect which
its author desired, encouraging every open and every
secret enemy of the Italian cause, and perplexing those
who had believed themselves to he engaged in a sacred
as well as a patriotic war. In Naples things hurried
far more rapidly to a catastrophe. Elections had been
held to the Chamber of Deputies, which
was to be opened on the 1 5tli of May, and
most of the members returned were men who, while
devoted to the Italian national cause, were neither lie-
publicans nor enemies of the Bourbon dynasty, but
anxious to co-operate with their King in tlie work of
Constitutional reform. Politicians of another character,
however, commanded the streets of Naples. Humours
were spread that the Court was on the point of restoring;
despotic government and abandoning the It^iaa cause.
Disorder and agitation increased from daj, to day;
and after the Deputies had arrived in the city and
begun a . series of informal meetings preparatory to the
opening of the Parliament, an ill-advised act of Ferdi-
nand gave to the party of disorder, who were weakly
represented in the Assembly, occasion for an insurrec-
tion. After promulgating the Constitution on Fehruaiy
10th, Ferdinand had agreed that it should be submitted
to the two Chambers for revision. He notified, how-
ever, to the Representatives on the eve of the opening
of Parliament that they would he required to take
an oath of fidelity to the Constitution. They urged
that such an oath would deprive them of their
right of revision. The King, after some hours, con-
sented to a change in the formula of the oath ; hut his
demand had ahready thrown the city into tumult.
Barricades were erected, the Deputies in vain en-
deavouring to calm the rioters and to prevent a conflict
with the troops. While negotiations were still in pro-
gress shots were fired. The troops now threw them-
selves upon the people ; there was a stru^le, short in
duration, hut sanguinary and merciless ; the barricades
were captured, some hundreds of the insurgents slain,
and Ferdinand was once more absolute master of
Naples. The Assembly was dissolved on the day after
thai on which it should have met. Orders were at once
sent by the Eing to 0enetal Pepe, commaoder of the
troops that were on the march to Lombardy, to return
with his army to Naples. Though Pepe continued
true to the national cause, and endeavoured to lead his
«8 XODEBN EUBOFB. tm.
army foriyard from Bologna in defiance of the King's
instructions, his troops now melted away ; and when he
crossed the Fo and placed himself under the standard
of Charles Alhert in Venetia there remained with him
scarcely fifteen hundred men.
It thus became clear before the end of May that
the Lombards would receive no considerable help from
the Southern States in their struggle for freedom, and
that the promised league of the Governments in the
national cause was but a dream from which there
was a bitter awakening. Nor in Northern Italy itself
was there the unity in aim and action without which
success was impossible. The RepubUcan party ac-
cused the King and the Provisional Government at
KKwiiaiiinu m Milan of an unwillingness to arm the
*" "''^'' people ; Charles Albert on his part regarded
every Republican as an enemy. On entering Lombardy
the King had stated that no question as to the political
organisation of the future should be raised until the
war was ended ; nevertheless, before a fortress had been
captured, he had allowed Modena and Parma to declare
themselves incorporated with the Piedmonteae mon-
archy; and, in spite of Mazzini's protest, their example
was followed by Lombardy and some Venetian districts.
In the recriminations that passed between the Republi-
cans and the Monarchists it was even suggested that
Austria had friends of its own in certain classes of the
population. This was not the view taken by the
Viennese Government, which from the first appeara to
have considered its cause in I^ombardy as virtually lost.
tarn. AUSTRIA AND ITALY. W
The mediation of Great Britain was invoked bj Metier-
nicb's successors, and a willingness expressed to grant
to the Italian provinces complete autonomy under the
Emperor's sceptre. Palmerston, in reply to the sappli-
cations of a Court which had hitherto cursed his influ-
ence, ui^ed that Lombardy and the greater part of
Venetia should be ceded to the King of Piedmont.
The Austrian Government would have given up Lom-
bardy to their enemy ; they hesitated to increase his
power to the extent demanded by Palmerston, the more
so as the French Ministry was known to be jealous of
the aggrandisemeDt of Sardinia, and to desire the
efitablishment of weak Bepublics like those formed in
1796. Withdrawing from its negotiations at London,
the Emperor's Cabinet now entered into direct commu-
nication with the Provisional GoverDmcnt at Milan,
and, without making any reference to Piedmont or
Venice, offered complete independence to Lombardy.
As the union of this province with Piedmont had
already been voted by its inhabitants, the offer was at
once rejected. Moreover, even if the It^iaus had shown
a disposition to compromise their cause fuid abandon
Venice, Eadetzky would not have broken off the com-
bat while any possibility remained of winning over
the Emperor from the side of the peace-party. In
reply to instructions directing him to offer an armistice
to the enemy, he sent Prince Felix Schwarzenberg to
Innsbruck to implore the Emperor to trust to the valour
of his soldiers and to continue the combat. Already
there were signs that the victory would ultimately be
eO X0BEB2T EUROPE. ma.
with Austria. Reinforcemeots had cut their way
through the iusurgoDt territory and renched Veroua;
aud although a movement by which Kadetzky threatened
to sever Charles Albert's communications was frustrated
by a second engagement at Goito, and Peschiera passed
into the besiegerii' hands, this was the last success wod
by the Italians. Throwing himself suddenly eastwards,
Radetzky appeared before Viccnza, and compelled this
city, with the entire Papal army, commanded by
General Durando, to capitulate. The fail
VMeumJuiM. of Vicenza was followed by that of the
other cities on the Venetian mainland till
Venice alone on the east of the Adige defied the
Austrian arms. As the invader pressed onward, an
Assembly which Manin had convoked at Venice decided
on union with Piedmont. Manin himself had been the
most zealous opponent of what be considered the
sacrifice of Venetian independence. He gave way
nevertheless at the last, and made no attempt to fetter
the decision of the Assembly ; but when this decision
bad been given he handed over the conduct of affairs to
others, and retired for a while into private life, declining
to serve under a king.*
Charles Albert now renewed his attempt to wrest
BBioeofc™- ^''^ central fortresses from the Austrians.
toiii, jiiii as. Leaving half his army at Peschiera and
farther north, he proceeded with the other half to
* Fi<»|nelnioiit, p. 6. PUlersdorff, Kftchkas, 93. Hdfeii, if. 1^
Schonhala, p. 177. Parliwueotary Papers, id. 332, 472, 597. Coiit«riiii,
p. 67- Azeglio, Operazioni del DnrRiido, p. 6. Wfttiip, Dooomeiit^ 1
289. Bionchi, Diplomada, t. 857. Fasoiini, p. 100 ,
Wtt BADETZS7 IN MILAN, tt
blockade Mantua. Kadetzky took advantage oE the ua-
skilfol generalship of his oppoaent, and threw hiiDBclE
npon the weakly guarded centre of the long Sardinian line.
The King perceived his error, and sought to unite with
his the northern detachments, now separated from him
by the Mincio. His efforts were baffled, and on the
25th of July, after a brave resistance, his troops were
defeated at Custozza. The retreat across the Mincio
was conducted in fair order, but disasters sustained by
the northern division, which should hare held the
enemy in check, destroyed all hope, and the retreat then
became a flight. Badetzky followed in close pursuit.
Charles Albert entered Milan, but declared himself
unable to defend the city. A storm of indignation
broke out against the unhappy King amongst the
Milanese, whom he was declared to have betrayed.
The palace where he had taken up his quarters was
besieged by the mob ; his life was threatened ; and he
escaped with difhcolty on the night of August 5th
under the protection of General La Marmora and a few
^thfiil Guards. A capitulation was signed, and as the
Piedmontese army evacuated the city Radetzky's troops
entered it in triumph. Not less than sixty
thousand of the inhabitants, according to mutMiiui,
" Aug. B.
Italian statements, abandoned their homes
and sought refuge in Switzerland or Piedmont rather
than submit to the conqueror's rule. Eadetzky could
now have followed his retreating enemy without diffi-
culty to Turin, and have crushed Piedmont itself under
foot ; but the fear of France and Great Britain checked
M MOBESJH BVBOFB. urn,
his career of victory, and hostilities were brought to a
close by an armistice at Tigevano on August 9th.*
The effects of Radetzky's triomph were felt in every
province of the Empire. The first open expression
given to the changed state of affairs was
oportaud the retum of . the Imperial Court from its
refuge at Innsbruck to Yienna. The elec-
tion promised in May had been held, and an Assembly
representing all the non-Hungarian parts of the Mon-
archy, with the exception of the Italian provinces, had
been opened by the Archduke John, as representative
of the Emperor, on the 33nd of July. Ministers and
Deputies united in demanding the retum of the Emperor
to the capital. With Radetzky and Windischgratz
within call, the Emperor could now with some eon-
fidence face his students and his Parliament. But of
far greater importance than the retum of the Court
to Vienna was the attitude which it now assumed
towards the Diet and the national Government of
Hungary. The concessions made in April, inevitable
as they were, had in fact raised Huogaiy to the
position of an independent State. When such matters
as the employment of Hungarian troops against Italy
or the distribution of the burden of taxation came into
question, the Emperor had to treat with the Hungarian
Ministry almost as if it represented a foreign and a
rival Power. Eor some months this humiliation had to
* ParliamentaiT Papers, 1849, ItuL p. 128. Tenice refused to «»-
knowledge the uuuetiee, and deUcbed itself from SudiuU, restoriog
Uimis to |>ower.
be borne, and tbe appearance of fidelity to the new
Constitutional law maintained. But a deep, resentful
hatred against the Magyar cause penetrated the circles
in which the old military and official absolutism of
Anstria yet survived ; and behind the men and tbe
policy still representing with some degree of siDcerity
the new order of thiogs, there gathered the passions and
the intrigues of a reaction that waited only for the
ontbrcak of civil war within Hungary itself, and the
restoration of confidence to the Austrian army, to draw
the sword t^ainst its foe. Already, while Italy was
still unsubdued, and the Emperor was scarcely safe in
his palace at Vienna, the popular forces that might' be
employed against the Govemment at Peath came into
view.
In One of the stormy sessions of the Hungarian
Diet at the time when the attempt was first made to
impose the Magyar language upon Croatia the Illyrian
leader, Gai, bad thus addressed the Assembly : " You
Magyars are an island in the ocean of Slavism. Take
heed that its waves do not rise and overwhelm you."
The station of the spring of 1848 first revealed in its
full extent the peril thus foreshadowed.
Croatia had for above a year been in almost southam
* BlIDgUJ.
open mutiny, but the spirit of revolt now
spread through ^e whole of the Serb population of
Southern Hungaiy, from the eastern limits of Slavonia,*
* SlATonlft ttaelf waa sHached bo Grutia ; Dslmstia «1m was clumed
Mftmember of thie triple Eiugdom under the Hnngariaa Grown in rirtna
of tncient riglitfl, tboagb iuie« its iuiiieiali<Mi in 1797 it lud been goveiBsd ,
M MODBBN EUBOPB. im
acroBa the plain known aa the Banat beyond the junc-
tion of the Theiss and the Danube, up to the borders
of Transylvania. The Serbs had been welcomed into
these provinces in the sixteenth and seventeenth cen-
turies by the sovereigns of Austria as a bulwark against
the Turks. Chartera had been given to them, which
were still preserved, promising them a distinct political
administration under their own elected Voivode, and
ecclesiastical independence under their own Patriarch of
the Greek Church.* These provincial rights had fared
much as others in the Austrian Empire. The Patriarch
and the Voivode bad disappeared, and the Banat had
been completely merged in Hungary. Enough, how-
ever, of Serb nationality remained to kindle at the sum-
mons of 1848, and to resent with a sudden fierceness
the determination of the Magyar i-ulera at Pesth that
the Magyar language, as the language of State, should
thenceforward bind together all the races of Hungary
in the enjoymeot of a common national life. The Serbs
had demanded from Kossuth and his colleagues the
restoration of the local and ecclesiastical autonomy of
which the Hapsburgs had deprived them, and the recog-
nition of their own national language and customs. They
found, or believed, that instead of a Grerman they were
now to have a Magyar lord, and one more near, more
energetic, more aggressive. Their reply to Kossuth's
direcUj from Tienua, and in 1848 was repreaented in the Reicliatag of
Vienna, not in that of FeaUi.
* The real meaning of the OhartoTS is, howefer. coatMted. Sprinip^,
U.281. Adlerstein, Arebir, i. 166. Helfeii, U. 2&5. Inltiji et ChMmn,
L 236. Di« Serbbche Wojwodschaftof ro^ p. 7.
nn CBjOATIA. 0S
defence of Magyar ascendency was the sammoning of a
CoBgress of Serbs at Carlowitz on the Lower
Danube. Here it was declared that the cjri<iwit.,M.f
Serbs of Austria formed a free and inde-
pendent nation under the Austrian sceptre and the com-
mon Hungarian Crown. A Voivode was elected and the
limits of his province were defined. A National Com-
mittee was charged with the duty of organising a Govern-
ment and of entering into intimate connection with the
neighbouring Slavic Kingdom of Croatia,
At Agram, the Croatian capital, all established
authority had sunk in the catastrophe of March, and a
National Committee had assumed power. It happened
that the office of Governor, or Ban, of Croatia was then
vacant. The Committee sent a deputation je„,^j„
to Vienna requesting that the colonel of
the first Croatian regiment, Jellacic, might be ap-
pointed. Without waiting for the arrival of the depu-
tation, the Court, by a patent dated the 23rd of March,
- nominated Jellacic to the vacant post. The date of this
appointment, and the assumption of office by Jellacic
on the 14th of April, the very day before the Hungarian
Ministry entered upon its powers, have been considered
proof that a secret understanding existed from the first
between Jellacic and the Court No further evidence
of this secret relation has, however, been made public,
and the belief long current among all friends of
the Magyar cause that Croatia was deliberately insti-
gated to revolt agjainst the Himgarian Government by
persons ajx)and the Emperor seems to rest on no solid
66 MODEElf SV&OPa. im
foundation. The Croats would have beeu unlike all
other communities in the Austrian Empire i£ thej had
not risen under the national impulse of 1848. They
had beeu murmuring against Magyar ascendency for
years past, and the fire long smouldering now probably
burst into flame here as elsewhere without the touch of
an incendiary hand. With regard to Jellacic's sudden
appointment it is possible that the Court, powerless to
check the Croatian movement, may have desired to
escape the appearance of compulsion by spontaneously
conferring office on the popular soldier, who was at least
more likely to regard the Emperor's interests than the
lawyers and demagogues around bim. Whether .iTeUacic
was at this time genuinely concerned for Croatian
autonomy, or whether from the first, while he appar-
ently acted with the Croatian nationalists, his deepest
synipatliies were with the Austrian army, and his sole
design was that of serving the Imperial Crown with or
without its own avowed concurrence, it is impossible to
say. That, like most of his countrymen, he cordially
hated the Magyars, is beyond doubt. The general im-
pression left by his character liardly accords with the
Magyar conception of him as the profound and far-
sighted conspirator; he would seem, on the contrary,
to have been a man easily yielding to the impulses of
the moment, and capable of playing contradictory parts
with little sense of his own inconsistency.*
* Bat tee Kooanth, Schrifton (1880) ii. 21S, for s conTersatJon betweea
JelUcio and BatlLj&n;, said to have been samted to Kosmth by tha
latter. 11 anthentic, Ihie cerfAiiil; pniToa Jcllaeic to haTe naed the Slavia
agitation from the first aolely for Aostrian ends. See alaoTitcthoiR, p. 207.
Installed m office, Jellacic cast to the winds all
eonsideratioa due to the Emperor's personal engage-
ments towards Hungary, and forthwith
permitted the Magyar officials to be driven g^"**- ^f*
oat of the country. On the 2nd of May
he issued an order forbidding all Croatian authorities
to correspond with the G-ovemment at Pesth. Battby-
finy, the Hungarian Premier, at once hurried to Vienna,
and obtained from the Emperor a letter commanding
Jellacic to submit to the Hungarian Ministry. As
the Ban paid no attention to this mandate, General
Hrabowsky, commander of the troops in the southern
provinces, received orders from Pesth to annul all that
Jellacic had done, to suspend him from his office, and
to bring him to trial for high treason. Nothing
daunted, Jellacic on his own authority convoked the
Diet of Croatia for the 5th of June ; the populace of
Agram, on hearing of Hrabowsky 'a mission, burnt the
Palatine in effigy. This was a direct outr^^ on the
Imperial family, and Batthy^y turned it to account.
The Emperor had just been driven from Vienna by the
riot of the 15th of May. Batthyiny sought him at
Innsbruck, and by assuring him of the support of his
loyal Hungarians against both the Italians and the
Viennese obtained his signature on June 10th to a
rescript vehemently condemning the Ban's action and
suspending him from office. Jellacic had already been
summoned to appear at Innsbruck. He set out, taking
with him a deputation of Croats and Serbs, and leaving
behind him a popular Assembly sitting at Agram, in
08 MOtBRN EUBOFS. tM.
whicli, besides the representatives of Croatia, there
were seventy jDepnties from the Serb provinces. On
the very day on which the Ban reached Innsbruck, the
Imperial order condemning him and suspending him
from his functions was published by Batthydny at
Pesth. Nor was the situation made easier by the
almost simultaDeons announcement that civil war had
broken out on the Lower Danube, and that Q-eneral
Hrabowsty, on attempting to occupy Carlowitz, had
been attacked and compelled to retreat by the Serbs
under their national leader Stratlmirovic*
It is said that the Emperor Ferdinand, daring
deliberations in council on which the fate of the Austrian
Empire depended, was accustomed to occupy
himself with counting the number of
carriages that passed from right and left
respectively under tlie windows. In the struggle be-
tween Croatia and Hungary he appears to have avoided
even the formal exercise of authority, preferring to
commit the decision between the contending parties to
the Archduke John, as mediator or judge. John waa
too deeply immersed in other business to give much
attention to the matter. What really passed between
Jellacic and the Imperial family at Innsbruck is un-
known. The official request of the Ban was for the
withdrawal or suppression of the rescript signed by the
Emperor on June 10th. Prince Esterhazy, who repre-
sented the Hungarian Government at Innsbruck, was
* Adleratein, Ardiiv, I. 146, 156. EUpkft, Erlnnenuigen, p. SOw
Ir&uji et OhKSBin, L 3^ Serbuehe Bewegnng, p. IVd.
ready to mate this concession ; but before the documeiit
could be revoked, it liad been made public by Batthyany.
With ihe object of proving his fidelity to the Court,
Jellacic now published an address to the Croatian
regiments serving in Lombardy, entreating them not
to be diverted from their duty to the Emperor in the
field by any report of danger to their rights and their
nationality nearer home. So great was Jellacic's influ-
ence with his countrymen that an appeal from him of
opposite tenor would probably have caused the Croatian
regiments to quit Badetzky in a, maa^, and so have
brought the war in Italy to an ignominious end. His
action won for him a great popularity in the higher
ranks of the Austrian army, and probably gained for him,
even if he did not possess it before, the secret confidence
of the Court. That some understanding now existed is
almost certain, for, in spite of the unrepealed declara-
tion of June 10th, and the postponement of the Arch-
duke's judgment, Jellacic was permitted to return to
Croatia and to resume his govemment. The Diet at
Agram occupied itself with far-reaching schemes for a
confederation of the southern Slavs ; but its discussions
were of no practical effect, and after some weeks it was
extinguished under the form of an adjournment. From
this time Jellacic held dictatorial power. It was un-
necessary for him in his relations with Hungary any
longer to keep up the fiction of a mere defence of
Croatian rights ; he appeared openly as the champion
of Austrian unity. In negotiations which he held with
Batthyany at Vienna during the last days of July, he
70 MODERN EVBOPS. am.
demanded the restoratiou of siogle Mioistries for War,
Finance, and Foreign Affairs for the whole Austrian
Fmpire.' The demand was indignantly refused, and the
chieftains of the two rival races quitted Vienna to pre-
pare for war.
The Hungarian National Parliament, elected under
the new Constitution, had been opened at Pesth on
July 5th. Great efforts had heen made, in view of the
difficulties with Croatia and of the suspected intrigues
between the Ban and the Court party, to induce the
^^ Emperor Ferdinand to appear at Pesth in
te^behram persoH. Hc excused himself from this on
the ground of illness, but sent a letter to
the Parliament condemning not only in his own name
but in that of every member of the Imperial family
the resistance offered to the Hungarian Government in
the southern provinces. If words bore any meaning,
the Emperor stood pledged to a loyal co-operation with
the Hungarian Ministers in defence of the unity and
the constitution of the Hungarian Kingdom as estab-
lished by the laws of April. Yet at this very time the
Minister of War at Vienna was encouraging Austrian
officers to join the Serb insurgents. Kossuth, who con-
ducted most of the business of the Hungarian Govern-
ment in the Lower Chamber at Pesth, made no secret
of his hostility to the central powers. While his col-
leagues sought to avoid a breach with the other half
of the Monarchy, it seemed to be Kossuth's object
rather to provoke it. In calling for a levy of two
hundred thousand men to crush the Slavic rebellion,
UA AUSTRIA AtU) SVNQAMY. 71
he openly denounced the Viennese Ministry and the
Court as its promoters. In leading the debate upon
the Italian War, he endeavoured without the know-
ledge of his colleagues to make the cession of the
territory west of the Adige a condition of Hun-
gary's participation- in the struggle. As Minister of
Finance, he spared neither word nor act to demon-
strate his contempt for the financial interests of
Austria. Whether a gentler policy on t!ie part of
the most powerful statesman in Hungary might have
averted the impending conflict it is vain to ask ; but in
the uncompromising ^enmity of Kossuth the Austrian
Court found its own excuse for acts in which shamolcss-
ness seemed almost to rise into political virtue. No
sooner had Kadetzky's victories and the fall of Milan
brought the Emperor back to Vienna than the new
policy came into efiect. The veto of the sovereign was
placed upon the laws passed by the Diet at Festb for
the defence of the kingdom. The Hungarian Govern-
ment was required to reinstate Jellacic in his dignities,
to enter into negotiations at Vienna with him and the
Austrian Ministry, and finally to desist from all mili-
tary preparations against the rebellions provinces. In
answer to these demands the Diet sent a hundred of its
members to Vienna to daim from the Emperor the
fulfilment of his plighted word. The miserable man
received them on the 9th of September with protesta-
tions of his sincerity ; but even before the deputation
liad passed the palace-gates, there appeared in the
official gazette a letter under the Emperor's own
78 UODEBN EUBOFB. Ma
hand replacing Jellacic in office and acquitting him
of every charge that had heen hrought against him. It
was for this formal recoErnition alone that
Jallubi mtond '^
He^SSiS^ Jellacic had been waiting. On the 11th
of September he crossed the Drave with hia
army, and began his march against the Hungarian
capital.*
The Ministry now in office at Vienna was composed
m part of men who had been known as reformers in the
early days of 1848 ; but the old order was represented
in it by Count Wessenbei^, who had been
^iJ^^ Metternich's assistant at the Congress of
Vienna, and by Latonr, the War Minister,
a soldier of high birth whose career dated hack to the
campaign of Austerlitz. Whatever contempt might be
felt by one section of tbe Cabinet for the other, its
members were able to unite against the independence of
Hungary as they had united against the independence
of Italy. They handed in to the Emperor a memorial
in which the very concessions to which they owed their
own existence as a Constitutional Ministry were made a
ground for declaring tbe laws establishing Hungarian
autonomy null and void. In a tissue of transparent
sophistries they argued that the Emperor's promise of a
Constitution to all his dominions on the 1 5tb of March
disabled him from assenting, without the advice of his
Viennese Ministry, to the resolutions subsequently
passed by the Hungarian Diet, although the union
between Hungary and the other Hereditary States had
* IrdnTi «^ Gbaasin. iL 5& Codex der nesen 0«ee(w (Festli}, L 7.
a*. AUSTRIA AND SUNaABT. 78
from tiie first rested solely on the person of the
monarch, and no German official had ever pretended to
exercise' authority over Hungarians otherviae than by
order of the sovereign as Hungarian King. The pub-
lication of this Cabinet memorial, which appeared in
the journals at Festh on the 17th of September, gave
plain warning to the Hungarians that, if they were not
to be attacked by JeUacic and the Austrian army simul-
taneously, they must make some compromise with the
Government at Vienna. Batthyany was inclined to
concession, and after resigning oEBce in consequence of
the Emperor's desertion be had already re-assumed his
post with coUe^ues disposed to accept his own pacific
policy. Kossuth spoke openly of war with Austria and
of a dictatorship. As Jellacio advanced towards Festh,
the Palatine took command of the Hungarian army and
marched southwards. On reaching Lake Baloton, on
whose southern shore the Croats were encamped, he
requested a personal conference with Jellacio, and sailed
to the appointed place of meeting. But he waited in
vain for the Ban ; and rightly interpreting this rejec-
tion of bis overtures, he fled from the army and laid
down hia office. The Emperor now sent General Lam-
bei^ from Vienna with orders to assume the supreme
command alike over the Magyar and the Croatian
forces, and to prevent an encounter. On the success of
I^mberg's mission hung the last chance of reconcilia-
tion between Hungary and Austria. Batthyany, still
clinging to the hope of peace, set out for the camp in
wder to meet the eirvoy on bis arrival. Lamberg,
74 MODERN EUBOPS. iM
desirous of obtaioing the necessary credentials from the
Hungarian OoTernment, made his way to Pestb. There
he found Kossuth and a Committee of Six inutulled in
power. Under their influence the Diet passed a resolu-
tion forbidding Lambei^ to assume command of the
Hungarian troops, and declaring bim a traitor if he
should attempt to do so. The report spread through ■
Pesth that Lamberg had come to seize the citadel and
bombard the town ; and before he could reach a place
of safety he was attacked and murdered by a raging
mob. It was in vain that Batthyany, who now laid
down his office, besought the Government at Vienna to
take no rash step of vengeance. The pretext for anni-
hilating Hungarian independence had been given, and
the mask was cast aside. A manifesto published by
the Emperor on the 3rd of October declared the Hun-
garian Parliament dissolved, and its acts null and void.
ji,;a,fy^ot Martial law was proclaimed, and Jellacic
**^'' appointed commander of all the forces and
representative of the sovereign. In the course of the
next few days it was expected that he would enter
Pesth as conqueror.
In the meantime, however confidently the Govern-
ment might reckon on Jellacic's victory, the passions of
revolution were again breaking loose in Vienna itself.
Increasing misery among the poor, financial panics, the
reviving efforts of professional agitators, had
£iS^^ renewed the disturbances of the spring in
forms which alarmed the middle classes
almost as much as the holders of power. The conflict
of the GoTemment with Hungary broaght afiairs to a
crisis. After discovering the nsel^sness of negotiations
with the Emperor, the Hangariaa Parliament had sent
some of its ablest members to request an audience from
the Assembly sitting at Vienna, in order that the re-
presentatives of the western half of the Empire might,
even at the last moment, hare the opportunity of pro-
nouncing a judgment npon the action of the Court.
The most numerous group in the Assembly was formed
by the Czech deputies from Bohemia. As Slavs, the
Bohemian deputies had sympathised with the Croats
and Serbs in their struggle against Magyar ascendency,
and in their eyes Jellacic was still the champion of a
national cause. Bhnded by their sympathies of race to
the danger involved to all nationalities alike by the
restoration of absolutism, the Czech majority, in spite
of a singularly impressive warning given by a leader of
the German Liberals, refused a hearing to the Hou-
garian representatives. The Magyars, repelled by the
Aasembly, sought and found allies in the democracy of
Vienna itself. The popular clubs rang with acclama-
tions for the cause of Hungarian freedom and with
invectives against the Czech instruments of tyranny.
In the midst of this deepening agitation tidings arrived
at Vienna that Jellacic had been repulsed in bis march
on Festh and forced to retire within the Austrian
frontier. It became necessary for the Viennese Govern-
ment to throw its own forces into the stru^le, and an
order was given by Latour to the regiments in the
capital to set out for the scene of war&re. This order
76 UOBERS EVBOPB. im.
had, however, been anticipated by the democratic
leaders, and a portion of the troops had been won over
to the popular side. Latour's commands were resisted ;
and upon an attempt being madfe to enforce the depar-
ture of the troops, the regiments fired on one another
(October 6th). The battalions of the National Guard
which rallied to the support of the Government were
overpowered by those belonging to the working men's
districts. The insurrection was victorious ; the Minis-
ters submitted once more to the masters of the streets,
" and the orders given to the troops were withdrawn.
But the fiercer part of the mob was not satisfied with a
political victory. Tliere were criminals and madmen
among its leaders who. after the offices of Government
had been stormed and Latour had been captured,
determined upon his death. It was in vain that some
of the keenest political opponents of the Minister
sought at the peril of their own lives to protect him
from his murderers. He was dragged into the court in
front of the War Office, and there slain with ferocious
and yet deliberate barbarity.*
The Emperor, while the city was still in tumult,
had in his usual fashion promised that the popular
Th« Bnpmrrt demauds should be satisfied ; but as soon as
""*" he was unobserved he fled from Vienna, and
in his flight he was followed by the Czech deputies and
• Adleratein, it 296. Helfert, aesohiehte OcBtorreiolu, I 79, ii. 192.
Dnnder, p. 77. Springer, ii. 520. VitBtlinm, p. 143. £ossath, Selirifton
(1881), u. 284 Reaoliauer, U. 563. PillersdorfE, NschUss, p. 163. Irinji
«t Cbasris, iL 9&.
D,a,l,zc.bvG00gIC
urn. WJKDJSOSQBATZ. 77
many German CoDservutirea, who declared that their
lives were no longer safe in the capital. Most of the
Ministers gathered round the Emperor at Olmutz in
Moravia , the Assembly, however, continued to hold its
sittings in Vienna, and the Finance Minister, apparently
nnder instructions from the Court, remained at his post,
and treated the Assembly as still possessed of legal
powers. But for all practical purposes the western half
of the Austrian Empire had now ceased to have any
Government whatever ; and the real state of affairs was
bluntly exposed in a manifesto published by Count
Windisohgratz at Prague on the 11th of October, in
which, without professing to have received any commis-
sion irom the Emperor, he announced his
intention of marching on Vienna in order mi^baDu
to protect the sovereign and maintain the
unity of the Empire. In due course the Emperor
ratified the action of his enei^etic soldier ; Windischgratz
was appointed to the supreme command over all the
troops of the Empire with the exception of Eadetzky's
army, and his march against Vienna was begun.
To the Hungarian Parliament, exasperated by the
decree ordering its own dissolution and the war openly
levied agiunafc the country by the Court in di_*u_itt,
alliance with Jellacic, the revolt of the capi- ?;^^rbot
tal seemed to bring a sudden deliverance
from all danger. The Viennese had saved Hungary,
and the Diet was willing, if summoned by the Assembly
at Vienna, to send its troops to the defence of the capital.
But the urgency of the need was not understood on either
78 MODERN EUS.OPB. »«.
side till too late. The Viennese Assembly, treating it-
self as a legitimate and constitutional power threatened
by a group of soldiers who had usurped the monarch's
authority, hesitated to compromise its legal cliaracter
by calling in a Hungarian army. The Magyar generals
on the other hand were so anxious not to paiis beyond
the strict defence of their own kingdom, that, in the ab-
sence of communication from a Viennese authority, they
twice withdrew from Austrian soil after following
Jelliicic in pursuit beyond the frontier. It was not
until Windischgratz had encamped within sight of
Vienna, and had detained as a rebel the envoy sent to
him by the Hungarian Government, that Kossuth's
will prevailed over the scruples of weaker men, and
the Hungarian army marched against the besiegers.
In the meantime Windischgratz had begun his attack
on the suburbs, which were weakly defended by the
National Guard and by companies of students and
voluuteers, tiie nominal commander being one Messen-
liaustT, formerly an ofliccr in the regular army, who
was assisted by a soldier of far greater merit than
himself, the Polish general Bern. Among those who
fought were two members of the German Parliament of
Frankfort, Uobert Blum and Frobel, who had been sent to
mediate between the Emperor. and his subjects, but had
remained at Vienna as combatants. The besiegers had
captured the outskirts of the city, and negotiations for '
surrender were in progress, when, on the 30th of
October, Messenhauser from the top of the cathedral
tower saw beyond the line of the besiegers on the
UM. WJNDiaOSQBlTZ SNTItBd VIENNA. 19
Eouth-east the smoke of battle, and annoanced that the
SoDgarian army was approaching. An eng^ement
had ID fact begun on the plain of Schwechat between
the Hungarians and Jellacic, reinforced by divisions of
Windiscbgratz' troops. In a moment of wild excite-
ment the defenders of the capital threw themselves once
more npoo their foe, disregai-ding the offer of surrender
that had been already made. But the tide of battle at
Schwechat tamed against the Hungarians. They were
compelled to retreat, and Windiscbgratz, reopening his
cannonade upon the rebels who were also violators of
their truce, became in a few hours master of Yienna.
He made his entry on the Slst of October, and treated
Yienna as a conquered city. The troops had behaved
with ferocity during the combat in the suburbs, and
slaughtered scores of unarmed persons. No Oriental
tynmt ever addressed his fallen foes with greater insolence
and contempt for human right than Windiscbgratz in
tbe proclamations which, on assuming government, he
addressed to the Yiennese ; yet, whatever might be the
number of persons arrested and imprisoned, the number
now put to death was not great. The victims were in-
deed carefully selected; the most prominent being Robert
Blum, in whom, as a leader of the German Liberals and
a Deputy of the German Parliament inviolable by law,
the Austrian Government struck ostentatiouBly at the
Parliament itself and at German democracy at large.
In the subjugation of Yienna the army had again
proved itself the real political power in Austria ; bat
the time bad not yet arrived when absolute government
80 UODEBN BUBOPB. MM.
could be opeiily restored. The BohemiaD deputies,
fatally as they had injured the cause of constitutional
rule by their secession from Vienna, were
still in earnest in the cause of provincial
autonomy, and would vehemently have re-
pelled the charge of an alliance with despotism. Even
the mutilated Parliament of Vienna bad been recog-
nised by the Court as in lawful session until the 22nd
of October, when an order was issued proroguing the
Parliament and bidding it re-assemble a month later at
Kremsier, in Moravia. There were indications in the
weeks succeeding the fall of Vienna of a conflict between
the reactionary and the more liberal influences sur-
rounding the Emperor, and of an impending coup tfetai :
but counsels of prudence prevailed for the moment;
the Assembly was permitted to meet at Kremsier,
and professions of constitutiooal principle were still
made with every show of sincerity. A new Ministry,
8ch»««..b«> however, came into office, with Prince
Felix Scbwarzenherg at its head. Schwarz-
enberg belonged to one of the greatest Austrian families.
He had been ambassador at Naples when the revolu-
tion of 1848 broke out, and had quitted the city with
words of menace when insult was offered to the
Austrian flag. Exchanging diplomacy for war iie
served under Eadetzky. and was soon recognUed as
the statesman in whom the army, as a political power
hITJ* V''' ^'"''^'' ^^P'-esentative. His career had
mtnerto been illustrated chiefly by scandals of private
I'f« «o flagrant that England and oth.r p^uutri Jwbere
ISM. BOHWjiSZBtTBSBa. 81
he had held diplomatic posts had iDsisted on his re-
moral ; hut the cynical and reckless audacity of the
man rose in his new calling as Minister of Austria to
something of political greatness. Few statesmen have
been more daring tbau Schwarzenberg ; few hare pushed
to more excessive lengths the advantages to be derived
from the moral or the material weakness of an adver-
sary. His rule was the debauch of forces respited in
their extremity for one last and worst exertion. Like
the Boman Sulla, he gave to a condemned and perishing
cause the passing semblance of restored vigour, and
died before the next great wave of change swept his
creations away.
Schwarzenberg's first act was the deposition of his
sovereign. The imbecility of the Emperor Ferdinand
had long suggested his abdication or dethronement, and
the time for decisive action bad now arrived. He
gladly withdrew into private life : the crown, declined
by his brother and heir, was passed on to „_,, ^ ^^
his nephew, Francis Joseph, a yonth of S^„^o^b
eighteen. This prince had at least not ''""'
made in person, not uttered with his own lips, iiot
signed with his own hand, those solemn engagements
with the Hungarian nation which Austria was now
about to annihilate with fire and sword. He had not
moved in friendly intercourse with men who were hence-
forth doomed to the scaffold. He came to the throne
as littie implicated in the acts of his predecessor as
anj nominal chief of a State conid be; as fitting an
instrnment in the bands of Court and army, as auT
82 MODERN BUROPX. UMl
reactioDaTy faction could desire. Helpless and well-
meaning, Francis Joseph, while his troops poured into
Hungary, played for a while in Austria the part of a
loyal observer of his Parliament; then, when the moment
Dtwdutton trf ^^ come for its destruction, he obeyed his
v^^^C soldier-minister as Ferdinand had in earlier
days obeyed the students, and signed the
decree for its dissolution (March 4, 1849). The Assem-
bly, during its sittings at Vienna, had accomplished one
important task: it had freed the peasantry from the
burdens attaching to their land and converted them into
independent proprietors. This part of its work sur-
vived it, and remained almost the sole gain that Austria
derived from the struggle of 1848- After the removal
to Kremsier, a Committee of the Assembly bad been
engaged with the formation of a Constitution for
Austria, and the draft was now completed. In the course
of debate something had been gained by the repre-
sentatives of theOerman and the Slavic races in the way of
respect for one another's interests and prejudices ; some
political knowledge hud been acquired ; some approach
made to an adjustment between the (ilaims of the cen-
tral power and of provincial autonomy. If the Consti-
tution sketched at Kremsier had come into being, it
woTild at least have given to "Western Austria and to
Galicia, which belonged to this half of the Empire, a
system of government based on popular desires and
worthy, on the part of the Crown, of a iair trial. But,
apart from its own defects from the monarchical point
of view, this Constitution rested on the division of the
Ml THB UNITABY EDKJT. 88
Empire into two independent parts ; it assumed the
Beparation of Hungary from the other Hereditary
States; and of a separate Hungarian Kingdom the
Minister now in power would hear no longer. That
Hungary had for centuriea possessed and maintained its
rights ; that, with the single exception of the English,
no nation in Europe had equalled the Magyars in the
stubhorn aud unwearied defence of Constitutional law ;
that, in an age when national spirit was far less hotty
ioflamed, the Emperor Joseph had well-nigh lost his
throne and wrecked his Empire in the attempt to
suhject this resolute race to a centralised administration,
was nothing to Schwarzenbci^ and the soldiers who
were now trampling upon revolution. Hungary was
deelwed to have forfeited by rebellion alike its ancient
rights and the contracts of 1848. The dissolution of
the Parliament of Kremsier was followed by
■' The UnitiUT
the publication of an edict affecting to ^^^X
bestow a uniform and centralised Constitu-
tion upon the entire Austrian Empire. All existing
public rights were thereby extinguished ; and, inasmuch
as the new Constitution, in so far as it provided for a
representative system, never came into existence, but
remained in abeyance until it was formally abrogated iu
1851, the real efEect of the Unitary Edict of March,
1849, which professed to close the period of revolution
hy granting the same rights to all, was to establish
absolute government and the rule of the sword through-
out the Emperor's dominions. ProTincial institutions
giving to some of the German and Slaric districts a,
0 %
84 MODERN EUROPE. u«.
shadowy control of their own local affairs only marked
the distinction hetwecn the favoured and tlie dreaded
parts of the Empire. Ten years passed before freedom
again came within sight of the Austrian peoples.*
The Hungarian Diet, on learning of the transfer of
the crown from Ferdinand to Francis Joseph, had re-
fused to acknowledge this act as valid, on the ground
that it had taken place vrithout the consent of the
Legislature, and that Francis Joseph had not been
crowned King of Hungary. Ferdinand was
"*^' treated as still the reigning sovereign, and
the war now hecame, according to the Hungarian view,
more than ever a war in defence of established right,
inasmuch as the assailants of Hungary were not only
violators of a settled constitution but agents of a
usurping prince. The whole nation was summoned to
arms; and in order that there might he no faltering
at headquarters, tbe command over the forces on the
Danube was given by Kossuth to Gorgei, a young officer
of whom little was yet known to the world but that
he had executed Count Eugene Zichy, a powerful noble,
for holding communications with 'Jellacic. It was the
design of the Austrian Government to attack Hungary
at once by the line of the Danube and from the frontier
of Galicia on the north-east. The Sorbs were to be
led forward from their border- provinces against the
capital ; and another race, which centuries of oppres-
sion had filled with bitter hatred of the Magyars, was
to be thrown into the struggle. The mass of the
* CMwt dec aenen GegetM^ i. S7. Helfert, ir. C8) 3SL
UML TBANSTLFAmA. 85
population of Trahsylvania belonged to the RoamaDiaa
stock. The Magyars, here known by the nw-p-n— 1_
name of Czeklers, and a community of •"^''™^'*""'^
Germans, descended from immigrants who settled m
TraosylTania about the twelfth century, formed a small
but a privileged minority, in whose presence the Rou-
manian peasantry, poor, savage, and absolutely without
political rights, felt themselves before 1848 scarcely
removed from serfdom. In the Diet of Transylvania
the Magyars held command, and In spite of tbe resist-
ance of the Germans, they had succeeded in carrying an
Act, in May, 1848, uniting the country with Hungary.
This Act had been ratified by the Emperor Ferdinand,
but it was followed by a widespread insurrection of the
Roumanian peasantry, who were already asserting their
claims as a separate nation and demanding equality with
their oppressors. The rising of the Boumanians had
indeed more of the character of an agrarian revolt than
of a movement for national independence. It was
marked by atrocious cruelty ; and although the Hapa-
bui^ standard was raised, tbe Austrian commandant,
General Puchner, hesitated long before lending the in-
surgents his countenance. At length, in October, he
declared against the Hungarian Government. The
union of the regular troops with the peasantry over-
powered for a time all resistance. The towns fell
under Austrian sway, and although the Czeklers were
not yet disarmed, Transylvania seemed to be lost to
Hungary. General Puchner received orders to lead
his troops, with tiie newly formed Boumauiun militia,^
86 MODERN EVBOFB. Uml
westward into the Banat, in order to co-operate in the
attack which was to overwhelm the HuDgarians from
every quarter of the kingdom.*
On the 15th of December, Windischgratz, in com-
mand of the main Austrian army, crossed the river
Leithu, the border between G^erman and Magyar terri-
tory. Gorgei, who was opposed to him,
oorapr pMiS! had from the first declared that Pesth must
he abandoned and a war of defence carried
on in Central Hungary. Kossuth, however, had scorned
this counsel, and announced that he would defend Pesth
to the last. The backwardness of the Hungarian pre-
parations and the disorder of the newlevies jastiSed the
young general, who from this time assumed the attitude
of contempt and hostility towards the Committee of
Defence. Kossuth bad in fact been strangely served by
fortune In his choice of Gorgei. He had raised him to
command on account of one irretrievable act of severity
against an Austrian partisan, and without any proof of
bis military capacity. In the untried soldier he had
found a general of unusual skill; in the supposed
devotee to Magyar patriotism he had found a mihtory
politician as self-willed and as insubordinate as any who
have ever distracted the councils of a falling State.
Dissensions and misunderstandings aggravated the
weakness of the Hungarians in the field. Position
after position was lost, and it soon became evident that
the Parliament and Government could remain no longer
« BevolatiouRkrieg in SiebeubQrgon, L 30. Helfwt, ii. 207. Ibm.
tiftoo et liiiiji, Lettrea Hougra-Koumaiues, Adlereteiu, iL 105.
.oogic
UML TBS WAS IN BUNQABT. S7
at Festh. They withdrew to Debreczin beyond the
Theiss, and on tbe 5th of January, 1849, Windiscbgratz
made his entry into the capital.*
The Austrians now supposed the war to be at an
end. It was in fact but beginning. The fortress of
Comom, on the Upper Danube, remained
ducting his retreat northwards into a moun-
tainous country where tbe Austrians could not foUow
him Gorgei gained the power either of operating against
Windiscbgratz's communications or of combining with
the army of General Klapka, who was charged with the
defence of Hungary gainst an enemy advanciog firom
Galicia. While AVindischgratz remained inactive at
Pestb, K.Iapka met and defeated an Austrian division
under General Schlick which had crossed the Carpathians
and was moving southwards towards Debreczin. Gorgei
now threw himself eastwards upon the line of retreat of
tbe beaten enemy, and Schlick's array only escjiped cap-
ture by abandoning its communications and seeking
refuge with Windiscbgratz at Festh. A concentration of
the Magyar forces was effected on the Theiss, and the
command over the entire army was given by Kossuth to
Dembinski, a Fole who had gained distinction in the
wars of Napoleon and in the campaign of Ko»«ai ud
1831. Gcirgei, acting as the representative *""*
of the officers who had been in the service before the
Kevolution, had published an address declaring that tbe
■ Klapka, Eiinnenuigea, p. 56. Helfert, ir. 199; Qorgei, Ldien nnd
Wirkan, i. 145. Adkratmn, iu. £76, 649.
I l,z<..:t,C00gIf
88 MODERN EUBOPS. Wft
army would fight for no cause but tbat o£ the Constitu-
tion as established by Ferdinand, the legitimate King,
and tbat it would accept no commands but those of the
Ministers whom Ferdinand had appointed. Interpreting
this manifesto as a direct act of defiance, and as a warn-
ing tbat the army migiit under Gorgoi's command
make terms on its own uutburity with tbe Austrian
Government, Kossuth resorted to the dangerous experi-
ment of superseding tbe national commanders by a Pole
who was connected with the revolutionary paHy through-
out Europe. The act was disastrous in its moral effects
upon the army ; and, as a general, Denibinski entirely
failed to justify his reputation. After permitting
Schlick's corps to escape him he moved forwards from
the Theiss agiiinst Pesth. He was met by tbe Austrians
and defeated at Kapolna (February 26). Both armies
retired to their earlier positiuns, and, after a declara-
tion from the Magyar generals that they would no
longer obey his orders, Dembinski was removed from
his command, though be remained in Hungary to in-
terfere once more with evil effect before the end of
the war.
The struggle between Austria and Hungary had
reached this stage when tbe Constitution merging all
Ttie Aiutriana provlncial riy-lits in one centralised system
IriTBii out of '^ . " ■'
Hung^iry, April, ^-^y published by Scbwarzeuberg. The
Croats, tbe Serbs, the Eoumanians, who had so credu-
lously flocked to the Emperor's banner under tbe belief
that they were fighting for their own independence, at
length discovered their delusion. Their cntbusiasui
wm. WAS IN SUNQARY. 60 .
Bant; the bolder among them even attempted to
detach their countrymen from the Austrian cause ; but
it was too late to undo what had already been
done. Jellacic, now undiBtinguisbable from any other
Austrian general, mocked the politicians of Agram
who still babbled of Croatian autonomy : Stratimirovic,
the national leader of the Serbs, sank before his rival
the Patriarch of Carlowitz, a Churchman who preferred
ecclesiastical immunities granted by the Emperor of
Austria to independence won on the field of battle by,
his countrymen. Had a wiser or more generous states-
manship controlled the Hungarian Government in the
first months of its activity, a union between the
Magyars and the subordinate races against Viennese
centralisation might perhaps even now have been
effected. But distrust and animosity had risen too
high for the mediators between Slav and Magyar to
attain any real success, nor was any distinct promise of
self-government even now to be drawn from the offers
of concession which were held out at Debreczia. An
interval of dazzling triumph seemed indeed to justify
the Hungarian Government in holding fast to its
Bovereigrn claims. In the hands of able leaders no task
seemed too hard for Magyar troops to accomplish.
Bem, arriving in Transylvania without a soldier, created
a new army, and by a series of extraordinary marches
and surprises not only overthrew the Austrian and
Eoumanian troops opposed to him, but expelled a
corps of Russians whom General Puchner in his ex-
tremity had invited to garrison Hemaannstadt. Gorgei,
• W UOPEBN ETIBOPS. ism
resuming in the first week of April the movement in
which Dembinski had failed, inflicted upon the Aus-
trians a series of defeats that drove them back to the
walls of Pesth; while Klapka, advancing on Comorn,
effected the relief of this fortress, and planted in the
rear of the Austrians a force which threatened to cat
them off from Vienna. It was in vain that the Austrian
Government removed Windiscbgriitz from his command.
His successor found that a force superior to his own
•was gathering round him on every side. He saw that
Hungary was lost; and leaving a garrison in the
fortress of Buda, he led off his army in has.te from the
capital, and only paused in his retreat when he had
reached the Austrian frontier.
The Magyars, rallying from their first defeats, had
brilliantly achieved the liberation of their land. The
D«umUon Court of Vienna, attempting in right of
""pr^raM?"" superior force to overthrow an established
constitution, had proved itself the inferior
power; and in mingled exaltation and resentment it
was natural that the party and the leaders who had
been foremost in the national struggle of Hungary
should deem a renewed union with Austria impos-
sible, and submission to the Hapsburg crown an
indignity. On the 19th of April, after the defeat
of Windiscbgratz but before the evacuation of Pesth,
the Diet declared that the House of Hapsburg
had forfeited its throne, and proclaimed Hungary an
independent State. No statement was made as to the
fature form of government, but everything indicated
tM. SaOLABATION OF INDBPENDSNOS. 91
thai HuDgaiy, if saccessful in maintaining its inde-
pendence, would become a Republic, with Kossuth,
who was now appointed Governor, for its chief. Even
in the revolutionary severance of ancient ties homage
was paid to the legal and constitutional bent of the
Hungarian mind. Nothing was said in the Declara-
tion of April 19th of the rights of man; there was no
Parisian commonplace on the sovereignty of the people.
The necessity of Hungarian independence was deduced
from ' the offences which the Austrian House had
committed against the written and unwritten iaw
of the land, offences continued through centuries
and crowned by the invasion under Windlschgratz,
by the destruction of the Hungarian Constitution in
the edict of March 9th, and by the introduction of the
Russians into Transylvania. Though coloured and
exaggerated by M^yar patriotism, the chaises made
against the Hapsburg dynasty were on the whole in
accordance with historical fact; and if' the affairs of
States were to be guided by no other considerations
than those relating to the performance of contracts,
Hungary had certainly established its right to be quit
of partnership with Austria and of its Austrian sovereign.
But the judgment of history has condemned Kossuth's
declaration of Hungarian independence in the midst of
the struggle of 1849 as a great political error. It
served no useful purpose ; it deepened the antagonism
already existing between the Government and a large
part of the army ; and while it added to the sources of
internal discord, it gave colour to the interventiqn^qr
M MODERN EVWPK IM*
Itussia as against a revolutiooary caase. Apart from
its disiustrous effect upon the immediate course of events,
it was based upon a narrow and inadequate view both
of the needs and of the possibilities of the future. Even
in the interests of the Magyar nation itself as a European
power, it may well be doubted whetlier in severance from
Austria suoh influence and such weight could possibly
have been won by a race numerically weak and sur-
rounded by hostile nationalities, as the ability and the
political energy of the Magyars have since won for
tl\em in the direction of the accumulated forces of the
Austro- Hungarian Empire.
It has generally been considered a fatal error on the
part of the Hungarian commanders that, after expelling
the Austrian army, they did not at once
wnoonsffiinit march upon Vienna, but returned to lay
siege to the fortress of Buda, wliich re-
sisted long enough to enable the Austrian Government
to reot^anise and to multiply its forces. But the inter^
vention of Russia would probably have been fatal to Hun-
garian independence, even if Vienna had been captured
and a democratic government established there for a
while in opposition to the Court at OlmQtz. The plan
of a Russian intervention, though this intervention wa.s
now explained by the community of interest between
Polish and Hungarian rebels, was no new thing.
Soon after the outbreak of the March Revolution the
Czar had desired to send his troops both into Fmssia
and into Austria as the restorers of monarchical author-
ilj- His help was declined on behalf of the King
ia«. BUSSlAJf intervention: »
of Frnssia ; in Austria the project had been discussed
at saccessire moments of danger, and after the over-
throw of the Imperial troops in Transylvania by Bern
the proffered aid was accepted. The Bussians who
then occupied Hermannstadt did not, however, enter
the country as combatants ; their task was to garrison
certain positions still held by the Austrians, and so to
set free the Emperor's troops for service in the field.
On the declaration of Hungarian independence, it be-
came necessary for Francis Joseph to accept hia pro-
tector's help without qualification or disguise. An
army of eighty thousand Kussiaos marched across
Galicia to assist the Austrians in grappling with an
enemy before whom, when single-handed, they had
succumbed. Other Russian divisions, while Austria
massed its troops on the Upper Danube, entered Tran-
sylvania from the south and east, and the Magyars in
the summer of 1849 found themselves compelled to
defend their country against forces three times more
numerous than their own.*
When it became known that the Czar had deter-
mined to throw all his strength into the scale, Kossuth
saw that no ordinary operations of war could possibly
avert defeat, and called upon his country-
men to destroy their homes and property at huiS^'jIIijS
the approach of the enemy, and to leave to "«" ' ■
the invader a flaming and devastated solitude. But
the area of warfare was too vast for the execution of
• Helfeii, ir. (2) 326. Elapka, Wit in Hungary, L 23. MutI at
Chuaiii. li 531. Odigel,U.61. ,,
M HODERN EUBOPM. torn.
this design, even if the nation had been prepared for
80 desperate s course. The defence of Hungary was
left to its armies, and Qorgei became the leading figure
in the calamitous epoch that followed. While the
Government prepared to retire to Czegedin, far in the
south-east, Gorgei took post on the Upper Danube, to
meet the powerful force which the Emperor of Austria
had placed under the orders of General Haynan, a
soldier whose mingled energy and ferocity in Italy had
marked him out as a fitting scoui^e for the Hungarians,
and had won for him supreme civil as well as militaty
powers. Gorgei naturally believed that tlie first object
of the Austrian commander woald be to effect a junction
with the Russians, who, under Paskiewitsch, the con-
queror of Kara in 1829, were now crossing the Car-
pathians; and he therefore directed all his efforts
i^inst the left of the Austrian line. While Tie was
unsuccessfully attacking the enemy on the river Waag
north of Comom, Haynau with the mass of his forces
advanced on the right bank of the Danube, and
captured Raab (June 28th). Qorgei . threw himself
southwards, bnt his efforts to stop Haynau were
in vain, and the Austrians occupied Pesth (July
1 1th). The Russians meanwhile were advancing
southwards by an independent line of march. Their
vanguard reached the Danube and the Upper Theiss,
and Gorgei seemed to be enveloped by the enemy. The
Hungarian Government adjured him to hasten towards
Czegedin and Axad, where Kossuth was concentrating
all the other divisions for a final atruj^le ; bnt Ctdrgei
MM. OAPITJTLATTON OF VILAQ08. 95
held on to his position about Comorn until his rctroat
oould only be effected by means of a vast detour north-
wards, and before he could reach Arad all was lost.
Dembinski waa again in command. Charged with the
defence of the passage of the Theiss about Czegedin, he
failed to prevent the Austriana from crossing the river,
and on the 5th of August was defeated at Czoreg with
heavy loss. Kossuth now gave the command to Bern,
who had hurried from Transylvania, where overpowering
forces had at length wrested victory from his grasp.
Bern fought the last battle of the campaign at Temes-
var. He was overthrown and driven eastwards, but
succeeded in leading a remnant of his army across the
Moldavian frontier and so escaped capture. Gorgei,
who was now close to Arad, had some
strange fancy that it woidd dishonour his vil^?Augn<*
army to seek refuge on neutral soil. He
turned northwards so as to encounter Russian and
not Austrian regiments, and without striking a
blow, without stipulating even for the lives of tlie
civilians in his camp, he led his army within tht-: Kus-
sian lines at Vilagos, and surrendered unconditionally
to the generals of the Czar. His own life was spared ;
no mercy was shown to those who were handed over as
his fellow -prisoners by the Kiissian to the Austrian
Government, or who were seized by Hayiiau as his
troops advanced. Tribunals more rescm- vj„^.„ „,
bling those of the French Reign of Terror *"-'■""-
than the Courts of a civilised Government sei.t tlie
Doblest patriots and soldiers of Hungary to the scalf^ld^
fte MODEBK BITROPS. um
To the deep disgrace of the Austrian Crown, Count
Batthy^ny, the Minister of Ferdinand, was included
among those whose lives were sacrificed. The ven-
geance of the conqueror seemed the more frenzied and
the more insatiable because it had only been rendered
possible by foreign aid. Crushed under an iron rale,
exhausted by war, the prey of a Government which knew
only how to employ its subject-races as gaolers over one
another, Hungary passed for some years into silence
and almost into despair. Every vestige of its old con-
stitutional rights was extinguished. Its territory was
curtailed by the separation of Transylvania and Croatia;
its administration was handed over to G-ermana from
Vienna. A conscription, enforced not for the ends of
military service but as the surest means of breaking
the national spirit, enrolled its youth in Austrian regi-
menla, and banished them to the extremities of the
empire. Ko darker period was known in the history of
Hungary since the wars of the seventeenth century
than that which followed the catastrophe of 1849.*
The gloom which followed Austrian victory was
now descending not on Hungary alone but on Italy
also. The armistice made between Eadetzky and the
King of Piedmont at Vigevano in August,
Anjmrt. 1818- 1848, lasted for seven months, durin? which
Mansb, iW». _ _ » O
the British and French Governments en-
deavoured, but in vain, to arrange terms of peace be-
tween the combatants. "With military tyranny in its
* Khpka, Ww, U. 106. Eriunemngeii, 58. Goi^, ii. 378. Kossuth,
Schriflen (18&0J, IL 281. Codex der nenen Oesetn^ L 75, 10&.
most bmtal fonn crashing down Lombardy, it was
impossible that Charles Albert should reaoance ib(
work of deliveraace to wbicb he had pledged himself.
Austria, on the other hand, had now sufficiently re-
eorered its strength to repudiate the concessions wluch
it had offered at an earlier time, and Schwarzenberg on
assuming pover announced that the Emperor would
maintain Lombardy at every cost. The prospects of
Sardinia as regarded help from the rest o£ the Peninsula
were far worse than when it took up arms in the spring
of 184)8. Projects of a general Italian federation, of a
military union between the central States and Piedmont,
of an Italian Constitoent Assembly, had succeeded one
another and left no result. Naples had fallen back
into absolutism; Rome and Tuscany, from which aid
might still have been expected, were distracted by in-
ternal contentions, and hastening as it seemed towards
anarchy. After the defeat of Charles Albert at Cus-
tozza, Pius IX., who was still uneasily playing his part
as a constitutional sovereign, had called to office Pelle-
grino Rossi, an Italian patriot of an earlier time, who
had since been ambassador of Lonis Philippe at Rome,
and by his connection with the Orleanist Monarchy
had incurred the hatred of the Republican
party throughout Italy. Rossi, as a vigorous Sp^j^^
and independent reformer, was as much de-
tested in clerical and reactionary circles as he was by
the demagogues and their followers. This, however,
profited him nothing; and on the 15th of November,
as he was proceeding to the opening of the Chambers.
M MODEBN SUBOPB. W»
he was asBaseinated by an unknown hand. Terrified
hy this crime, and by an attack upon his own palace by
which it was followed, Pius fied to Oaeta and placed
himself under the protection of the King of Naples. A
BomuBtipab- Coustituent Assembly was summoned and
ti<>,Fai>.B,iatt. ^ Republic proclaimed at Eome, between
which and the Sardinian Government there was so little
community of feeling that Charles Albert would, if the
Pope had accepted bis protection, have sent bis troops
to restore him to a position of security. In Tuscany
affaira were in a similar condition. The Grand Duke
had for some months been regarded as a sincere, though
reserved, friend of the Italian cause, and he bad even
spoken of surrendering his crown if this should be for
the good of the Italian nation. When, however, the
Pope had fled to Gaeta, and the project was openly
avowed of uniting Tuscany with the lloman
States in a Republic, the Grand Duke,
moved more by the fulminations of Pius against his
despoilcTs than by care for his own crown, fled in his
turn, leaving the IJepublicans masters of Florence. A
miHerable exhibition of vanity, riot, and braggadocio
was given to the world by the politicians 'of the Tuscan
State. Alite in Florence and in Kome all sense of the
true needs of the moment, of the absolute uselessuess
of internal changes of Government if Austria was to
maintain its dominion, seemed to have vanished from
men's minds. Republican phantoms distracted the heart
and the understanding ; no soldier, no military adminis-
trator arose till too late by the side of the rhetoricians
iML AU8TBIA AND FIBDMOST. 99
and mob-leaders who filled the st^e; and when, on
the 1 9th of March, the armistice was hrought to a
close in Upper Italy, Piedmont took the field alone.*
The campaign which now began lasted hot for
five days. While Charles Albert scattered his forces
from L^o Maggiore to Stradella on the south of the
Po, hoping to move by the northern road npoo Milan,
Badetzky concentiated his troops near Pavia, where he
intended to cross the Ticino. In an evil -riaXMivhemn^
moment Charles Albert had given the com- '*'*°' ***■
mand of his army to Chrzanowski, a Pole, and Ad
entrusted its southern division, composed chiefly of
Lombard volunteers, to another Pole, Ramorino, who
had been engaged in Mazzioi's incursion into Savoy in
1833. Ramorino had then, rightly or wrongly, incurred
the charge of treachery. His relations with Chrzanow-
ski were of the worst character, and the habit of mili-
tary obedience was as much wanting to him as the
sentiment of loyalty to the sovereign from whom
he had now accepted a command. The wilfulness of
this adventurer made the Fiedmontese army an easy
prey. Bamorino was posted on the south of the
Po, near its junction with the Ticino, but received
orders on the commencement of hostilities to move
northwards and defend the passive of the Ticino at
Pavia, breaking up the Iwidges behind him. Instead
of obeying this order he kept his division lingering
about Stradella. Badetzky, approaching the Ticino at
• Farini, a 404. Pul. Pftp^ 1849, Itu. 607 ; IriiL (2) 117.
Di^omuii^ tL 67. Geon&reUi, STentim^ p. 29. FaMliiii, {>. 139.
100 MODEMN BUSOPS. mm
Pavia, foand the passage unguarded. He crossed the
river with the mass of his axmj, and, cutting off Bamo-
rino's division, threw himself upon the flank of tlie
scattered Piedmontese. Charles Albert, whose head-
quarters were at Novara, hurried southwards. Before
be could concentrate his troops, he was attacked at
Mortara by the Austrians and driven back. The line
of retreat upon Turin and Alessandria was already
lost ; an attempt was made to bold Novara against the
BatOB oi Ng- advaHciog Austrians. The battle which
ni^Mutiii3. ^^ fought in front of this town on the
23rd of March ended with the utter overthrow of the
Sardinian army. So complete was the demoralisation of
the troops that the cavalry were compelled to attack
bodies of half-maddened infantry in the streets of
Novara in order to save the town from pill^e.*
Charles Albert had throughout the battle of the
33rd appeared to seek death. The reproaches levelled
against him for the abandonment of Milan in the
previous year, the charges of treachery which awoke to
new life the miserable record of his waverings in 1821,
had sunk into the very depths of his being. Weak
and irresolute in his earlier political career, harsh and
illiberal towards the pioneers of Italian freedom during
a great part of his reign, Charles had thrown his whole
heart and soul into the final struggle of his country
against Austria. This struggle lost, life had nothing
• SchoDlulB, p. 332. Pftri. P^., 1849, IviiL (2) 216. Bianehi, Folitiat
Anatiiacv p. VH. Lsmarmon, Ud Episodio, p. 175- Fortkfog'li di
RatuoriiM^ p. 4L Biunoriao was ooDdemned to deaib, and eieonlfld.
more for Mm. The personal hatred borne towards him
by the mlers of Austria caused him to believe that
easier terma of peace might be granted to
Piedmont if another sovereign were on its
throne, and bis resolution, in case oE defeat, was fixed
and settled. When night fell after the battle of Novara
he called together his generals, and in their presence
abdicated his crown. Bidding an eternal farewell to his
SOD Victor Emmanuel, who knelt weeping before him,
he quitted the army accompanied by but one attendant,
and passed unrecognised through the enemy's guards.
He left his queen, his capital, nnvisited as he journej'ed
into exile. The brief residue of his life was spent in
solitude near Oporto. Six months after the battle of
Kovara he was carried to the grave.
It may he truly said of Charles Albert that nothing
in his reign became him like the ending of it. Hope-
less as the conflict of 1849 might well appear, it proved
that there was one sovereign in Italy who was willing
to stake his throne, his life, the whole sum of his per-
sonal interests, for the national cause ; one dynasty
whose sons knew no fear save that others should en-
counter death before them on Italy's behalf.
Had the profoundest statesmanship, the VKCEnimm-
keenest political genius, governed the coun-
sels of Piedmont in 1849, it would, with full prescience
of the ruin of Novara, have bidden the sovereign and
the army strike in self-sacrifice their last xmaided blow.
From this time there was but one possible head for
Italy. The faults o£ the Government of Turin during
Xtt MODESN SVSOPS. M*
Charles Albert's years of peace liad ceased to have any
hearing on Italian affairs; the sharpest tongues no
longer repeated, the most credulous ear no longer
harboured the slanders of 1848; the man who, beaten
and outnumbered, had for hours sat immovable in
front of the Austrian cannon at Novara had, in the
depth of his misfortune, given to his son not the crown
of Piedmont only but the crown of Italy. Honour,
patriotism, had made the young Victor Emmanuel the
hope of the Sardinian army ; the same honour and
patriotism carried him safely past the lures which Aus-
tria set for the inheritor of a ruined kingdom, and gave
in the first hours of his reign an earnest of the policy
which was to end in Italian union. It was necessary
for him to visit Radetzky in his camp in order to
arrange the preliminaries of peace. There, amid flat-
teries offered to him at his father's expense, it was
notified to him that if he would annul the Constitution
that his father had miide, he might reckon not only on
an ea.sy quittance with the conqueror but on the friend-
ship and support of Austria, Tliis demand, though
streuuously pressed in later negutiations, Victor Em-
manuel unconditionally refused. He had to endure for
a while the presence of Austrian troops in his kingdom,
and to furnish an indemnity which fell heavily on so
small a State ; but tlie liljerties of his people remained
intact, and the pledge given by his father inviolate.
Amid the ruin of all hopes and the bankruptcy of all
other royal reputations throughout Italy, there proved to
he one man, cue government, in which the Italian people
could trast. This compensation at leaat waa given in
the disasters of 1849, that the traitors to the cause of
Italy and of freedom could not again deceive, nor the
dream of a federation of princes ^^ain obscure the
necessity of a single national government. In the
fidelity of Victor Emmanuel to the Piedmontese Con-
Btitution lay the pledge that when Italy's next opportu-
nity should arrive, the chief would be there who would
meet the nation's need.
The battle of Novara had not long been fought
when the Grand Duke of Tuscany was restored to his
throne under an Austrian garrison, and his „
late democratic Minister, Guerazzi, who had towdj.
endeavoured by submission to the Court-party to avert
an Austrian occupation, was sent into imprisonment.
At Borne a far bolder spirit was shown. Mazzini had
arrived in the iirst week of March, and, though his
exhortation to the Roman Assembly to for- Boa»»a&
get the offences of Charles Albert and to ■'~^
unite against the Austrians in Lombardy came too late,
he was able, as one of a Triumvirate with dictatorial
powers, to throw much of his own ardour into the
Roman populace in defence of their own city and State.
The enemy against whom Borne had to be defeoded
proved indeed to be other than that against whom pre-
parations were being made. The victories of Austria
had aroused the apprehension of the French Govern-
ment; and though the fall of Piedmont and Lombardy
could not now be undone, it was determined by Louis
Napoleon and hia Ministers to antidpate Austrian's
IIM MODBBN EUBOFB. MM.
restoration of the Papal power by tlie despatch of
French troops to llome. All the traditions of French
national policy pointed indeed to such an intervention.
Austria had already invaded the Roman States from the
north, and the political conditions which in 1832 had
led so pacific a minister as Casimir Perier to occupy
Ancona were now present in much fjreater force. Lonis
Napoleon could not, without ahrnd ning a recognised
interest and surrendering something of the due infiuence
of France, have permitted Austrian generals to conduct
the Pope back to his capital and to assume the govern-
ment of Central Italy. If the first impulses of the
Eevolotion of 1848 had still beenkactive in France, its
intervention would probably have taken the form of a
direct alliance with the Boman Republic; hut public
opinion had travelled far in the opposite direction since
the Four Days of June ; and the new President, if he
had not forgotten his own youtliful relations with the
Carbonari, was now a suitor for the solid favours of
French conservative and religious sentiment. His
Ministers had not recognised the Eoman Republic.
They were friends, no doubt, to liberty ; but when it
was certain that the Austrians, the Spaniards, the Nea-
politans, were determined to restore the Pope, it might
be assumed that the continuance of tlie Roman Republic
was an impossibility, rniuce, as a Catholic and at the
same time a Liberal Power, might well, under these
circumstances, address itself to the task of reconciling
Roman liberty with the inevitable return of the Holy
Father to his temporal throne- Events were moving
■K FRSNOB mTSSVENTIOlT. 105
too fast for diplomacy; troops mast be at once de-
spatched, or the next French envoy would find Hadetzky
on the Tiber. The misgivings of the Bepuhlican part
of the Assembly at Paris were stilled by assurances of
the generous intentions of the Qovemment
towards the Roman populations, and of its Tuitjoa dcto^
anxiety to shelter them from Austrian do-
mination. President, Ministers, and generals resolutely
shut their eyes to the possibility that a French occupa-
tion of Rome might be resisted by force by the Romans
themselves; and on the 22nd of April an armament of
about ten thousand men set sail for Civita Yeccliia
under the command of Qeneral Oudinot, a sod of the
Marshal of that name.
Before landing on the Italian coast, the French
general sent envoys to the authorities at
Civita Vecchia, statin? that his troops came ciriu vecctais,
•^ ^ April a, IWll.
as friends, and demanding that they should
be admitted into the town. The Municipal Council
determined not to offer resistance, and the French thus
gained a footing on Italian soil and a basis for their
operations. Mess^es came from French diplomatists
in Rome encouraging the general to advance without
delay. The mass of the population, it wivs said, would
welcome his appearance; the democratic faction, if
reckless, was too small to offer any serious resistance,
and would disappear as soon as the French should enter
the city. On this point, however, Oudinot was speedily
undeceived. In reply to a military envoy who was
sent to assure the Triumvirs of the benevolent designs
loe UODEBN EUBOFS. am
of the French, Mazzini bluntly answered that no le-
conciliatioQ with the Pope was possible ; and on the
26th of April the Roman A^Bembly called upon the
Executive to repel force by force. Oudinot now
proclaimed a state of siege at Civita Vecchia, seized
the citadel, and disarmed the garrison. On the 28th
he began his march on Rome. As he approached,
energetic preparations were made for resistance. Gari-
baldi, who had fought at the head of a
^meuidun- free corps against the Austrians in Upper
Italy in 1848, had now brought some hun-
dredfl of his followers to Rome. A regiment of JJom-
bard volunteers, under their young leader Manara, had
escaped after the catastrophe of Kovara, and had come
to fight for liberty in its last stronghold on Italian
soil Heroes, exiles, desperadoes from all parts of the
Peninsula, met In the streets of Rome, and imparted to
its people a vigour and resolution of which the world
had long deemed them iocapable. Even the remnant
of the Pontifical Guard took part in the work of de-
fence. Oudinot, advancing with his little corps of
seven thousand men, found himself, without heavy
artillery, in front of a city still sheltered by its ancient
fortifications, and in the presence of a body of com-
batants more resolute than his own troops and twice as
numerous. He attacked on the SOth^ was checked at
every point, and compelled to retreat towards Civita
Vecchia, leaving two hundred and fifty prisoners in
the hands of the enemy.*
• Ouil»ldi,EpistoUrio,L3a DelTeocMoiL'aMeaiodi Bom^&SO:
£[i8igmficant as was this misfortune of the French
.inns, it occasioned no small stir in Paris and in the
Assemhly. The Government, which had declared that
the armament was intended only to protect ^^ ^^
Borne against Aiistria, was vehemently re- ■*»^-"*»-
proached For its duplicity, and a vote was passed de-
manding that the expedition should not be permanently
diverted from the end assigned to it. Had the As-
sembly not been on the verge of dissolution it would
probably have forced upon the Government a real
change of policy. A general election, however, was
but a few days distant, and until the result of this
election should be known the Ministry determined to
temporise. M. Lesseps, since famous as the creator of
the Suez Canal, was sent to Bome with instructions to
negotiate for some peaceable settlement. More houest
than his employers, Lesseps sought with heart and
sold to fulfil his task. While he laboured in city and
camp, the French elections for which the President and
Ministers were waiting took place, resulting in the
return of a Conservative and reactionary majority. The
new Assembly met on the 28th of May. In the course
of the next few days Lesseps accepted ternas proposed
by the Roman Government, which would have pre-
cluded the French from entering Rome. Oudinot, who
had been in open conflict with the envoy throughout
his mission, refused his sanction to the treaty, and the
TailLut, Siege de Rome, p. 12. Bisnebi, DiploIIUui(^ Ti 213. Gnemml,
Garibaldi, i. 26S. Omuet de CasBagtiac, iL £&. Leaaepa, USouure, f. 61.
BuTot,iu.l9L Diseonn de Nft|>oleoa ^ p. 38. C'OO'^lc
108 MODBRN BUMOPM. im
altercations between the general and the diplomatist
were still at their height when despatches arrived
from Paris announcing that the powers given to
Lesseps were at an end, and ordering Oudinot to re-
" commence hostilities. The pretence of further negotia-
tion would have been out of place with the new Par-
liament. On the 4th of June the French general, now
strongly reinforced, occupied the positions necessary for
a regular siege of Rome.
Against the forces now brought into action it was
impossible that the Roman Republic could long defend
itself. One hope remained, and that was in a revo-
lution within France itself. The recent
taaJa^ to elections had united on the one side all
Conservative interests, on the other the
Socialists and all the more extreme factions of the
Republican party. It was determined that a trial of
strength should first be made within the Assembly
itself upon the Roman quetition, and that, if the majority
there should stand ilrm, an appeal should be made to
insurrection. Accordingly on the 11th of June, after
the renewal of hostilities bad been announced in Paris,
Ledru RolHo demanded the impeachment of the Minis-
try. His motion was rejected, and the signal was
given for an outbreak not only in the capital but in
Lyons and other cities. But the Government were on
their guard, aod it was in vain that the resources of
revolution were once more brought into play. General
Changarnier suppressed without bloodshed a tumult in
Paris on Jun« 13th; and though fighting took place
BHi TSS FRENOH BlfTBB EOIO. 100
at LyoDB, the insuirectiou proved feeble in comparison
wiih the movements of the previous year. Louis Napo-
leon and his Ministry remained unshaken, and the siege
of Rome was accordingly pressed to its ooDclosion.
Oadinot, who at the beginniog of the month had carried
the positions held by the Roman troops outside the
walla, opened fire with heavy artillery on the 14th.
The defence was gallantly sustained by Qaribaldi and
his companions until the end of the month, when the
breaches made in the walls were stormed by the enemy,
and further resistance became impossible. The French
made their entry into Rome on the 3rd of July, Gari-
baldi leading his troops northwards in order
to prolong the struggle with the Austrians sdm-bodm^
who were now in possession of Bologna, and,
if possible, to reach Venice, which was still uncaptured.
Driven to the eastern coast and surrounded by the
enemy, he was forced to put to sea. He landed again,
but only to be hunted over mountain and forest. His
wife died by his side. Rescued by the devotion of
Italian patriots, he made his escape to Piedmont and
thence to America, to reappear in all the fame of his
heroic deeds and sufferings at the next great crisis in
the history of his country.
It had been an easy task for a French army to con-
qn^ Rome ; it was not so easy for the French Govern-
ment to escape from the embarrassments
of its victory. Liberalism was still the official Poniflaj
creed of the Republic, and the protection of
the Roman population from a reaction under Austriw
UO UODEBN EUBOPB. IM,
auspices had been one of the alleged objects of the
Italian expedition. No stipulation had, however, been
made with the Pope during the siege as to the future
institutions of Borne ; and when, on the 14th of July,
the restoration of Papal authority was formally an-
nounced by Oudinot, Pius and his Minister Antonelli
still remained unfettered by any binding engagement.
Kor did the Pontiff show the least inclination to place
himself in the power of his protectors. He remained
at Gaeta, sending a Commission of three Cardinals to
assume the government of Rome. The first acts of
the Cardinals dispelled any illusion that the French
might have formed as to the docility of the Holy See.
In the presence of a French Eepublican army they
restored the Inquisition, and appointed a Board to
bring to trial all oflficials compromised in the events
that had taken place since the murder of Rossi in
November, 184S. So great was the impression made
on public opinion by the action of the Cardinals that
Louis Napoleon considered it well to enter the lists in
person on behalf of Roman liberty ; and in a letter to
Colonel Ney, a son of the Marehal, he denounced in
language of great violence the efforts that were being
made by a party antagonistic to France to base the
Pope's return upon proscription and tyranny. Strong
in the support of Austria and the other Catholic Powers,
the Papal Government at Gaeta received this menace
with indifference, and even made the discourtesy of th^
President a ground for withholding concessions. Of
the re-establishment of the Constitution granted by
Pins in 1848 tbeie was now do qneation; all tbat the
French Ministry could hope was to Bave some frug-
ments in the general shipwreck of representative govern-
ment, and to avert the vengeance that seemed likely to
fall upon the defeated party. A Pontifical edict, known
as the Motu Proprio, oltiinatcly bestowed upun the
manicipalities certain local powers, and gave to a Coun-
cil, nominated by the Pope from among the persons
chosen by tbe municipalities, the right of consultation
on matters of finance. More tlian this Pius refused to
grant, and when he returned to Itome it was as an
absolute sovereign. In its efforts on behalf of the large
body of persons threatened with prosecutioQ the French
Government was more successful. The so-called am-
nesty which was publi.shed by Antonelli with the Motu
Proprio seemed indeed to have for its object the classi-.
fixation of victims rather than tlie announcement of
pardon ; but under pressui'e from the French the ex-
cepted persons were gradually diminished in number,
and all were finally allowed to escape other penbilties
by going into exile. To those who were so driveu from
their homes Piedmont offered a ii'fuge.
Thus the pall of priestly absolutism and misrule
fell once more over the Komau States, and tlie dfejHT
tbe hostility of the educated classes to the n'stored
power the more active became the system of repres-sloii.
For liberty of person there wiis no security whatever,
irtfd, though the offences of 1848 were now professedly
amnestied, the prisuns were soon thronged witti persons
arrested on indefinite charges and detained. {or aa^
lis XODSRS BUBOPM. jM
unlimited time without trial. Nor was Borne more nofor-
luiaiVMiM tunate in its condition tban Italy generally.
Aug.tt. ijijjg restoration of Austrian authority in
the north was completed by the fall of Venice. For
months after the subjugation of the maialand, Yenice,
where the Republic had again been proclaimed and
Manin had been recalled to power, had withstood all
the efforts of the Emperor's forces. Its hopes had been
raised by the victories of the Hungarians, which for a
moment seemed almost to undo the catastrophe of
Novara. But with the extinction of all possibility of
Haogarian aid the inevitable end came in view.
Cholera and famine worked with the enemy ; and a
fortnight after Oorgei bad laid down his arms at
Vilagos the long and honourable resistance of Venice
ended with the entry of the Austrians (August 25th).
In the south, Ferdinand of Naples was again ruling as
despot throughout the full extent of his
bj 'f^SSSS, dominions. Palermo, which had atrucfc the
April, Msf.
first blow for freedom in 1848, had Boon
afterwards become the seat of a Sicilian Parliament,
which deposed the Bourbon dynasty and offered the
throne of Sicily to the younger brother of Victor
Emmanuel. To this Ferdinand replied by sending
a fleet to Messina, which bombarded that city for five
days and laid a great part of it in ashes. His violence
caused the British and French fleets to interpose, and
hostilities were snspended until the spring of 1849, the
Western Powers ineffectually seeking to frame some
compromise acceptable at once to the Sicilians and to
IMl KAPLSS AKD BIOJLY. 113
the Bourbon dynasty. After the triumph of Badetzky
at Novara and the rejection by the SictUan ParUatnent
of the offer of a separate coDstitution and administra-
tion for the island, Ferdinuid refused to remain any
longer inactive. His fleet and mtdj moved southwards
from Messina, and a victory won at the foot of Mount
Etna over the Sicilian forces, followed by the capture of
Catania, brought the struggle to a close. The Assembly
at Palermo dispersed, and the Neapolitan troops made
their entry into the capital without resistance on the
15th of May. It was in vain that Gtreat Britain now
urged Ferdinand to grant to Sicily the liberties which
he had hitherto professed himself willing to bestow.
Autocrat he was, and autocrat he intended to remain.
On the mainland the iniquities practised by his agents
seem to have been even worse than in Sicily, where at
least some attempt was made to use the powers of the
State for the purposes of material improvement. For
those who had incurred the enmity of Ferdinand's
Government there was no law and no mercy. Ten
years of violence and oppression, denounced by the
voice of freer lands, had still to be home by the subjects
of this obstinate tyrant ere the reckoning-day arrived,
and the deeply rooted jealousy between Sicily and
Naples, which had wrought so much ill to the cause
of Italian freedom, was appeased by the &U of the
Bourbon throne.*
We have thus far traced the st^es of conflict
* M^nirij Doonmeiita, iL 310. Ferlbiujh, Htuun, p. 37. Gl«DDarelIi,
Gorerua Pontificiia^ i, 32. Gontariui, p. 22^
lU JSOBERS EOBOPB. imel
between the old monarcliical order and the forces of
GtrmMnitma rcvolution in the Austrian empire and in
"*'' that Mediterranean land whose destiny was
so closely interwoven with that of Austria, We have
now to pass back into Germany, and to- resume the
history of the German revolution at the point where
the national movement seemed to concentrate itself in'
visible form, the opening of the Parliament of Frank-
fort on the 18th of May, 1848. That an Assembly
representing the entire German people,
AnembiT at elccted in unbounded enthusiasm and com-
Fnuklort.
prising within it nearly every man of poli-
tical or intellectual eminence who sj'mpathised with the
national cause, should be able to impose its will upon
the tottering Governments of the individual German
States, was not an unnatural belief in the circum-
staiicoa of the moment. No second Chamber represented
the interests of the ruling Houses, nor had they within
the Assembly itself the organs for the expression of
their own real or unreal claims. With all the freedom
of a debating club or of a sovereign authority like the
French Convention, the Parliament of Frankfort entered
upon its work of moulding Germany afresh, limited
only by its own discretion as to what it should make
matter of consultation with any other power. There
were thirty-six Governments in Germany, and to
negotiate with each of these on the future Constitu-
tion might well seem a harder task than to enforce a
Constitution on all alike. In the creation of a pro-
visional executive authority there was something of the
wa. QEBMAS SATIOKAt AaBBMSLY. 115
same difficulty. Each of the lai^r States might, if
consulted, resist the selection of a proTisional chief from
one of its rivals; and though the risk of bold action
was not denied, the Assembly, on the instance of its
President, Yon Qagem, a former Minister of Hesse-
Darmstadt, resolved to appoint an Administrator of
the Empire by a direct vote of its own. The
Archdnte John of Austria, long known as sn enemy
of Uettemicb's system of repression and as a patron
of the idea of German anion, was chosen Adminis-
trator, and he accepted the office. Prussia and the
other States acquiesced in the nomination, though
the choice of a Hapsbuig prince was
nnpopular with the Prussian nation and — -..
army, and did not improve the relations
between the Frankfort Assembly and the Court of
Berlin.* Schmerling, an Austrian, was placed at the
head of the Archduke's Ministry.
In the preparation of a Constitution for Germany
the Assembly could draw little help from the work of
l^islatora in other countries. Belgium, whose institu-
tions were at ,once recent and successful,
was not a Federal State : the founders of the A-«bir.
American Union had not had to reckon with
(our kings and to include in their federal territory part
of the dominions of an emperor. Instead of grappling
at once with the formidable difficulties of political
'TerliaadloiigflnderK'atioiulTeraaiiimlimg, 1.576. lUdowit^ Weifa^
iases. Bri«twaehMlFriedricliWiUielm^p.20fi. Biedranuum, Drdaslff
Jilin,L295.
/2
>;lc
116 MODERN BtmOPS. Utf
oiganisatioD, the Committee charged with the draftiog
of a Constitution determined first to lay down the prin-
ciples of civil right which were to be the basis of tbe
' German commonwealth. There was something of the
scientific spirit of the Germans in thua working out the
Rubstructure of public law on which all other iastitu-
tions were to rest ; moreover, the remembrance of the
Decrees of Carlsbad and of the otlier exceptional legis-
lation from which Germany had so heavily suffered ex-
cited a strong demand for the most solemn guarantees
against arbitrary departure from settled law in the
future. Thus, regardless of the absence of any material
power by which its conclusions were to be enforced, the
Assembly, in the intervals between its stormy debates
on the politics of the hour, traced with philosophic
thoroughness the consequences of the pri ucJples of
personal liberty and of equality before the !aw, and
fiishioned the order of a modem society in which pri-
vileges of chiss, diversity of jurisdictions, and tlie tram-
mels of feudalism on industrial life were alike swept
away. Four months had passed, and the discussion of
the so-called Primary Rights was still unfinished, when
the Assembly was warned by an outbreak of popular
violence in Frankfort itself of the necessity of hasten.
ing towards a constitutional settlement.
The progress of the insurrection in Scbleswig-Hol-
TheAmtrtto, ^^^" Hgaiust Danish sovereignty had been
3f^^ watched with the greatest interest through-
out Germany; and in the struggle of these
provinces for their independence the rights and the
, ......Coogic
Ml BOBLsawm-soisTEitT. va
honour of the Gbrman nation at large were held to
be deeply inrolved. As the representative of the
Federal authority, King Frederick William of Prussia
had sent his troops into Holstein, and they arrived
there in time to prevent the Danish army from follow-
ing up its first successes and crushing the insui^nt
forces. Taking up the offensive, General Wrangel at
the head of the Prussian troops succeeded in driving
the Danes out of Schleswig, uid at the beginning of
May he crossed the border between Schleswig and
Jutland and occupied the Danish fortress of Fredericia.
His advance into purely Danish territory occasioned the
diplomatic intervention of Russia and Great Britain;
and, to the deep disappointment of the German nation
and its Parliament, the King of Prussia ordered his
general to retire into Schleswig. The Danes were in
the meantime blockading the harbours and capturing
the merchant-vessels of the Germans, as neither Prussia
nor the Federal Government possessed a fleet of war.
For some weeks hostilities were irresolutely continued
in Schleswig, while negotiations were pursued in foreign
capitals and various forms of compromise urged by
foreign Powers. At length, on the 20th of August, an
armistice of seven months was agreed upon at Malmo in
Sweden by the representatives of Denmark and Prussia,
the Court of Copenhagen refusing to recognise the Ger-
man central Government at Frankfort or to admit its
envoy to the conferences. The terms of this armistice,
when announced in Germany, excited the greatest in-
dignatioDi inasmuch as they declared all the acts of the
118 MODERN EVROPB. iHa
FrovisioDal GoTemment of Sdileewig-Holstem null and
Toid, removed all German troops from tbe Duchies, and
handed over their government during the duration of
the armistice to a Commission of which half the mem-
bers were to be appointed by the King of Denmark.
Scornfully as Denmark had treated the Assembly of
Frankfort, the terms of the armistice nevertheless re-
quired its sanction. The question was referred to a
committee, which, under the influence of the his-
torian Dahlmann, himself formerly an official in Hol-
Btein, pronounced for the rejection of the treaty.
The Assembly, in a scene of great excitement, re-
solved that the execution of tbe measures at-
tendant on the armi-stice should be suspended.
The Ministry in consequence resigned, and Dahl-
mann was called upon to replace it by one under
his own leadership. He proved unable to do so.
Schmerling resumed office, and demanded that the
Assembly should reverse its vote. Though in sever-
ance from Prussia the Central Government had no real
means of carrying on a war with Denmark, the most
passionate opposition was made to this demand. The
armistice was, however, ultimately ratified by a small
majority. Defeated in the Assembly, tbe leaders of the
extreme Democratic faction allied themselves with the
populace of Frankfort, which was ready for
^^^ acts of violence. Tumultuous meetings
were held ; the deputies who had voted for
the armistice were declared traitors to Germany. Barri-
cades were erected, and although the appearance of
Prassian tnxips prevented an assaoH from being
made on the Assembly, its members were attacked
in the streets, and two of them murdered bj the mob
(Sept. 17th). A Itepnbltcan insaTTectioo was once
more attempted in Baden, but it was quelled without
difficulty.*
The interrention of foreign Courts oa behalf of
Denmark bad g^iven ostensible ground to the Prus-
sian Government for not pursuing the war with
greater resolution ; but though the fear of iEussia un-
doubtedly checked King Frederick William, this was
not the sole, nor perhaps the most powerful influence
that worked upon him. The cause of Schleswig-Hol-
stein was, in spite of its legal basis, in the main a
popular and a revolutionary one, and between the
King of Prussia and the revolution there was an in-
tense and a constantly deepening antago- g^,„ ^j^,_
nism. Since the meeting of the National ^^p*-'""-
Assembly at Berlin on the 22nd of May the capital had
been the scene of an almost unbroken course of disorder.
The Assembly, which was far inferior in ability and
character to that of Frankfort, soon showed itself
unable to resist the influence of the populace. On the
8th of June a resolution was moved that the combat-
ants in the insurrection of March deserved well of their
country. Had this motion been carried the King
woold have dissolved the Assembly : it was outvoted,
• TeriuudliuigBii der N&tioiul TerBMiimliin)^, H. 1877, 2185. Heraog
Ernet IX, Am meinem Leben, i. 313. Bicdernutnn, I 306. Beeeler,
Erlebtci^ p. 68. Waits, Ftiede mit Sanemttrk. Badowit^ iiL M9.
120 MODBiar Etmops. »»
but the mob punished this conceasioa to the feelings ol
the monarch by outrages upon the members of the
majority. A Civic Guard was enrolled from citizens
of the middle class, but it proved unable to maintain
order, and wholly failed to acquire the political import-
ance which was gained by the National Guard of
Paris after the revolution of 1830. Exasperated by
their exclusion from service in the Guard, the mob
on the 14th of June stormed an arsenal and destroyed
the trophies of arras which they found there. Thoagh
violence reigned in the streets the Assembly rejected a
proposal for declaring the inviolability of its members,
and placed itself under the protection of the citizens of
Berlin. King Frederick William had withdrawn to
Potsdam, where the leaders of reaction gathered round
him. He detested his Constitutional Ministers, who,
between a petulant king and a suspicious Parliament,
were unable to effect any useful work and soon found
themselves compelled to relinquish their office. In
Berlin the violence of the working classes, the inter-
ruption of business, the example of civil war in Paris,
inclined men of quiet disposition to a return to settled
government at any price. Measures brought forward
by the new Ministry for the abolition of the patri-
monial jurisdictions, the hunting-rights and other feudal
privileges of the greater landowners, occasioned the
organisation of a league for the defence of property; which
Boon became the focus of powerful conservative interests.
niHustrator of the Empire, to iLe homage of the army.
and tie hostile attitude assumed towards tbe anoy
by the Prassian Parliament itself, exasperated the .
mUitaiy class and encouraged the king to venture on
open resistance. A tumult having taken place at
Schweidnitz in SUesia, in which several persons were
shot by the soldiery, the Assembly, pending an in-
vestigation into the circumstances, demanded that the
Minister oE War should publish an order requiring the
officers of the array to work with the citizens for the
realisation of Constitutional Government ; and it called
upon all officers not loyally inclined to a Constitutional
system to resign their commissions as a matter of
honour. Denying the right of the Chamber to act as a
military executive, the Minister of War refu.sed to pub-
lish the order required. The vote was repeated, and
in the midst of threatening demonstrations in the streets'
the Ministry resigned (Sept. 7th).*
It bad been the distinguishing feature of the Prus-
sian revolution that the army had never for a moment
wavered, in its fidelity to the throne. The ThePTu«i»n
success of the insurrection of March 18th ""''
had been due to the paucity of troops and the errors of
those in command, not to any military disaffection
isuch as bad paralysed authority in Paris and in the
Mediterranean States. Each affront offered to the
army by the democratic majority in the Assembly sup-
plied the King with new weapons ; each slight passed
upon the royal authority deepened the indignation of
• Brief weehral Friedrioh WilbelmB, p. 181. Waganer, ErlebtM, p. 28.
StiLr, FreiiBBuche Revoliitioii, i. 453.
I i,z<..t,CoogIc
122 XODSBN BUROPn. MK
tlie officers. The armistice of Malmd brought bacV to
the neighboorhood of the capital a general who was
longing to crush the party of disorder, and regimenta
on whom he could rely ; but though there was now no
military reaeon for delay, it was not until the capture of
Yiemia by Windischgmtz had dealt a fatal blow at
democracy in Germany that Frederick "William deter-
mined to have done with his own mutinous Parliament
and the mobs by which it was controlled. During
September and October the riots and tumults in the
streets of Berlin continued. The Assembly, which had
rejected the draft of a Constitution submitted to it by
the Cabinet, debated the clauses of one drawn up by
a Committee of its own members, abolished nobility,
orders and titles, and struck out from the style of the
sovereign the words that described him as King by the
Grace of God. When intelligence arrived in Berlin
that the attack of Windischgriitz upon Vienna had
actually begun, popular passion redoubled. The As-
sembly was besieged by an angry crowd, and a resolu-
tion in favour of the intervention of Prussia was brought
forward within the House. This was rejected, and it
was determined instead to invoke the mediation of the
Central Government at Frankfort between the Emperor
and his subjects. But the decision of the Assembly on
this and every other point was now matter
burg Ministw, of indiffereuce. Events outstripped its de-
liberations, and with the fall of Vienna
its own course was run. On the 3nd of November the
King dismissed his Ministers and called to office the
D,a,l,zc.bvG00gIe
IM. END OF TBS PBUBBIAN PASUAXBlfT. 123
Goant (J BTandenbai|r, . a nataral son of Frederick
William II., a soldier in high command, and one of
the most outspoken representatives of the monarchical
spirit of the army. The meaning of the appointment
was at once anderatood. A deputation from the Ag-
semhij coDveyed its protest to the King at Potsdam.
The King turned his hack upon them with-
out Gfivin? an answer, and on the 9t;h of Fn«^nA«w
November an order was issued proroguing
the Assembly, and bidding it to meet on the 27th at
Brandenburg, not at Berlin. "
The order of prorogatdoQi as soon as signed hy the
King, was brought into the Assembly by the Ministers,
who demanded that it should he obeyed immediately
and without discussion. The President
aUowing a debate to commence, the Minis-
ters and Beventy-eighfConserratiTe deputies
left the Hall. The remtuning deputies, two hundred
and eighly in namher, then passed a resolution declaring
that they would not meet at Brandenburg ; that the
King had no power to remove, to prorogue, or to
dissolve the Assembly without its own consent ; and
that the Ministers were unfit to hold office. This chal-
lenge was answered by a prodamatioa of the Ministers
declaring the further meeting of the deputies il-
l^al, and calling upon the Civic Guard not to recog-
nise them as a Parliament. On the following day
Gteneral Wrangel and his troops entered Berlin and
surrounded the Assembly Halh In reply to the pro-
tests of the President, Wrangel answered that the
IM MODERN EITROPE. IM«
Parliament had been prorogued and must disappear.
The members peaceably left the Hall, but reassembled
at another spot that they had selected in anticipation of
expulsion ; and for some days they were pursued by
the military from one place of meeting to another. On
the l5th of November they passed a resolution declaring
the expenditure of state-funds and the raising of taxes
by the Government to be illegal bo long as the Assem-
bly should not be permitted to continue its delibera-
tions. The Ministry on its part showed that it was
determined not to brook resistance. The Civic Guard
was dissolved and ordered to surrender its arms. It
did so without striking a blow, and vanished from the
scene, a memorable illustration of the political nullity
of the middle class in Berlin as compared with that of
Paris. The state of siege was proclaimed, the freedom
of the Press and the right of public meeting were sus-
pended. On the 27th of November a portion of the
Assembly appeared, according to the King's order,
at Brandenburg, but the numbers present were not
sufficient for the transaction of business. The
presence of the majority, however, was not required,
for the King had determined to give no further
legal opportunities to the men who had defied him.
Treating the vote of November 15th as an act of rebel-
lion on the part of those concerned in it,
t^AiemMr. the King dissolved the Assembly (Decem-
ber 5th), and conferred upon Prussia a Con-
stitution drawn up by his own advisers, with the pro-
mise that this Constitution should be subject to revision
is«. PSVBBIAlf CONSTITUTION. 125
by the fatore representatJTe body. Thongh the dis-
BolatioD of the Assembly occaeioued tumults ia Brealau
and Cologne it was not actively resented by
the nation at lare'e. The violence of the taaaa nutad
. . . bjsdint
fallen body during its last weeks of exist-
«aoe bad exposed it to general discredit; its vote of
the 1 6tb of November had been formally condemned by
the Parliament of Frankfort ; and the liberal character
of the n^w Constitution, which agreed in the main with
the draft-ConstitatioQ produced by the Committee of
the Assembly, disposed moderate men to the belief that
in the conflict between the King and the popular repre-
sentatives the fault had not been on the side of the
sovereign.
In the meantime the Parliament of Frankfort,
warned against longer delay by the disturbances of
September 17th. had addressed itself in earnest to the
settlement of the Fedend Constitution of Gtermany.
Above a host of minor difficulties two great problems
oonfronted it at the outset. The first was
Ths naokturt
the relation of the Austrian Empire, with ^^^1^1
its partly Qerman and partly foreign terri-
tory, to the German national State ; the other was the
nature of the headship to be established. As it was
clear that the Austrian Government could not apply the
public law of Germany to its Slavic and Hungarian pro-
vinces, it was enacted in the second article of the Frank-
fort Constitatdon that where a German and a nou-German
territory had the same sovereign, the relation between
these conntriea most be one of purely personal union
m m>D»SS VTJROM. mm,
uucleT the BOTereigo, do part of Gertnanj being incor-
porated into a single State with any DOD-Germaa laud.
At the time when this article was drafted the disintegra-
tion of Austria seemed more probable than the re-estab-
lishment of its unity ; no sooner, however, had Prince
Schwarzenbei^ been brought into power by the subju-
gation of Vienna, than he made it plain that the
government of Austria was to be centralised as it bad
never been before. In the first public declaration of
his policy he announced that Austria would maintain
its unity aud permit no exterior influence to modify its
internal organisation ; that the settlement of the rela-
tions between Austria and Germany could only be
efiectcd after each had gained some new and abiding
political form ; and that in the meantime Austria would
continue to fulfil its duties as a confederate.* The in-
terpretation put upon this statement at Frankfort was
tliat Austria, in the interest of its own unity, preferred
not to enter the German body, but looked forward to
the establishment of some intimate alliance with it at •
a future time. As the Court of Vienna had evidently
determined not to apply to itself the second article of
the Constitution, and an antagonism between Qerman
and Austrian policy came within view, Schmerling, as
un Austrian subject, was induced to resign his oSice.
and was succeeded in it by Gagem, hitherto President
of the Assembly (Dec. 16th).t
* Seine Bunde»)>fiic3itfti i an ambignoiw exfnvssion that miirlit nean
.iflier its dntiee M an ally or iffi dutiaa as a member of tbfl German
Federation. The obaonritj was probahlj iuteutioiiaL
f Yerhaudlnugeii dec Kattuual YarBammliuig, tL i225. Hajm,
n« OBBXAN NATIONAL ABBEMBLY. 127
In aDDonncmg the policy of the new Ministrj,
Cragem assumed the exclusion of Austria from the Ger-
man Federation. Claiming for the As- _ _ , , _
sembly, as the representatiTe of the German SSSST'sSt
nation, sovereign power in drawing up the
Constitution, he denied that the Constitution could be
made an object of negotiation with Austria. As
Austria refused to fulfil the conditions of the second
article, it must remain outside the Federation ; the
Ministry desired, however, to frame some close and
special connectioo between Austria and Germany, luad
asked for authority to negotiate with the Court of
Vienna for this purpose. Gagem'a declaration of the
exclusion of Austria occasioned a vehement and natural
outburst of feeling among the Austrian deputies, and
was met by their almost unanimous protest. Some days
later there arrived a note from Schwarzenberg which
struck at the root of all that had been done and all
that was claimed by the Assembly. Repudiating the
interpretation that had been placed upon his words,
Schwarzenbeig declared that the affairs of Germany
could only be settled by an nnderstanding between the
Assembly uid the Courts, and by an anaogement with
Austria, which was the recognised chief of the Govern-
ments and intended to remain so in the new Federation.
The question of the inclusion or exclusion of Austria
now threw into the shade all the earlier differences
bettreeu parties in the Assembly. A new dividing-line
Deafaehe KkBonal Twaammlanff, iL 112. lUdowit^ ifi. 4S». Helf erit
lr.63.
^ L ,i,z<,.f,GoogIf
128 MODERN EUBOPB. wm.
was drawn. On tlie one side appeared a gronp com-
posed of the Austrian representatives, of Ultramontanes
wlio feared a Proteistant ascendency if Austria should
be excluded, and of deputies from some of the smaller
States who had begun to dread Prussian domination.
On the other side was the great body of representatives
who set before all the cause of German national nnion,
who saw that this union would never be effected in any
real form if it was made to depend upon negotiations
with the Austrian Court, and who held, with tlie
Minister, that to create a true German national State
without the Austrian provinces was better than to
accept a phantom of complete union in which the
German people should he nothing and the Cabinet of
Vienna everything. Though coalitions and intrigues
of parties obscured the political prospect from day to
day, the principles of Gagem were affirmed by a
majority of the Assembly, and authority to negotiate
some new form of connection with Austria, as a power
outside the Federation, was granted to the Ministry.
The second great difficulty of the Assembly was the
settlement of the Federal headship. Some were for a
TbaVMtni hereditary Emperor, some for a President
""^''^ or Board, some for a monarchy alternating
between the Houses of Prussia and Austria, some for
a sovereign elected for life or for a fixed period. The
first decision arrived at was that the head should be one
of the reigning princes of Germany, and that he should
bear the title of Emperor. Against the hereditary
principle there was a strong and, at first, a sQCcessfal
urn. QSBXAN OOSBTPTimoS^ 129
opposition. Besemng for fbtare diBCossion other
questions relating to the imperial office, the Assembly
passed the Constitation through the first reading on
February 3rd, 1 849. It was now communicated to all
the German QoTemmenta, with the request that they
would offer their opinions upon it The four minor
kingdoms — Saxony, Hanover, Bavaria, and Wiirtem-
bei^ — with one consent declared f^inst any Federation
in which Austria should not be included ; the Cabinet
of Vienna protested against the subordination of the
Emperor of Austria to a central power vested in any
other German prince, and proposed that the entire
Austrian Empire, with its foreign as well as its German
elements, shonld enter the Federation. This note was
enough to prove that Austria was in direct conflict
with the scheme of national union which the Assembly
had accepted ; bnt the full peril of. the situation was
not perceived till on the 9th of March Schwarzen-
berg published the Constitution of Olmutz, which ex-
tinguished all separate rights throughout the Austrian
Empire, and confounded in one mass, as subjects of the
Emperor Francis Joseph, Hungarians, Germans, Slavs
and Italians. The import of the Austrian demand now
stood ont clear and nndisguised. Austria claimed to
range itself with a foreign population of thirty millions
witjiin the German Federation ; in other words, to
reduce the German national union to a partnership
with all the nationalities of Central Europe, to throw
the weight of an overwhelming influence against any
system of free represoitative government, ^ and to
J . ■ C.ooolc
130 liODSBN SUROFB. UMl
expose Germany to war where no interests but those
of the Pole or the Magyar might be at stake. So
deep was the impression made at Frankfort by the
f^l of the Kremsier Parliament and the publication of
Schwarzenberg's unitary edict, that one of the most
eminent of the politicians who had hitherto opposed
the exclusion of Austria — the Baden deputy "Welcker —
declared 'that further persistence in this course would
be treason to Germany. Banging himself with the
. Ministry, he proposed that the entire German Constitu-
tion, completed by a hereditary chieftainship, should
be passed at a single vote on the second reading, and
that the dignity of Emperor should be at once offered
to the King of Prussia. Though the Assembly de-
clined to pass the Constitution by a single vote, it
agreed to vote upon clause by clause without discussion.
The hereditary principle was affirmed by the narrow
majority of four in a House of above five hundred.
The second reading of the Constitution was completed
on the 27th of March, and on the followinsr
Kins rndsiiiA °
Ail*!dEi^ii«, ^^y t'lfi election of the sovereign took place.
Two huiidp'd and ninety votes were given
for the King of Prussia. Two hundred and forty-eight
members, hostile to the hereditary principle or to the
prince selected, abstained from voting.*
Frederick William had from early years cherished
the hope of seeing some closer union of Germany estab-
lished under Prussian influence. But he dwelt in a
• Teriuudlangen, riii 609a B«sel«r, p. 82. Hdfert, It. ($) 8BQ.
Hayin, il 317. lUdonitz, t. 477.
D,a,l,zc.bvG00gIe
m. FBEDBBIOK WILLIAX IV. 131
woild where there was more of picturesque mirage than
of real insight. He was almost superstitiously loyal to
the House of Austria ; and he failed to per-
ceive, what was palpable to men of far in-
ferior endowments to his own, that bj setting Prussia
at the head of tlie constitutional movement of the epoch
he might at any time from the commencement of his
reign have rallied all Germany round it. Thus the
revolution of 184S burst upon him, and he was not the
man to act or to lead in time of revolution. Even in
1848, had he given promptly and with dignity what,
after blood had been shed in his streets, he bad to give
with humiliattOD, he would probably have been ac-
claimed Emperor on the opening of the Parliament of
Frankfort, and have been accepted by the universal voice
of Germany. But the odium cast upon him by the
struggle of March 18th was so great that in the election
of a temporary Administrator of the Empire in June
no single member at Frankfort gave him a vote. Time
was needed to repair his credit, and while time passed
Austria rose from its ruins. In the spring of 1849
Frederick William could not have assumed the office of
Emperor of Germany without risk of a war with Aus-
tria, even had he been willing to accept this office on
the nomination of the Frankfort Parliament. But to
accept the Imperial Crown from a popular Assembly
was repugnant to his. deepest convictions. Clear as the
Frankfort Parliament had been, as a whole, from the
taint of liepublicanism or of revolutionary violence, it
had nevertheless had its birth in revelation : the crown
I3S MODERN SUROPR uMl
which it offered would, in the King's expression, have
been picked up from blood and mire. Had the princes
of Germany by any arrangement with the Assembly
tendered the crown to Frederick William the case
would have been different ; a new Divine right would
have emanated from the old, and conditions fixed by
negotiation between the princes and the popular As-
sembly might have been endured. That Frederick Wil-
liam still aspired to German leadership in one form
or another no one doubted ; his disposition to seek
or to reject an accommodation with the Frankfort
Parliament varied with the influences which surrounded
him. The Ministry led by the Count of Brand^iburg,
though anti-popular in its domestic measures, was de-
sirous of arriving at some undor»tanding with Gagem
and the friends of German union. Shortly before the
first reading of the Constitution at Frankfort, a note
had been drafted in the Berlin Cabinet admitting under
certain provisions the exclusion of Austria from the
Federation, and proposing, not that the Assembly
should admit the right of each Government to accept
or reject the Constitution, but tbat it should meet in a
fair spirit such recommendations as all the Governments
together should by a joint act submit to it. This note,
which would have rendered an ^reement between the
Prussian Court and the Assembly possible, Frederick
William at first refused to sign.. He was induced to
do so (Jan. 23rd) by his confidant Bunsen, who him-
self was authorised to proceed to Frankfort. During
Bunsea's ftb^ace despatches arrived at Berlin &om
nw. FBBBERIOK WnJ.IAM SSFUSES TSB OROWS, 133
Scliirarzenbei^, who, in his usiial resolute way, proposed
to dissolve the Frankfort Assemhly, and to divide Gei^
manj between Austria, Prussia, and the four secondary
kingdoms. Bunsen on his return found his work an-
done ; the King recoiled under Austrian pressure from
the position which he had taken up, and sent a note
to Frankfort on the 16th of February, which described
Austria as a necessary part of Germany and claimed
for each separate Goyemment the right to accept or
reject the Constitution as it might think fit. Thus
the acceptance of the headship by Frederick William
under any conditions compatible with the claims of
the Assembly was known to be doubtful when, on
the 28tb of March, the majority resolved to offer him
the Imperial Crown. The disposition of the Ministry
at Berlin was indeed still fevourable to an accom-
modation; and when, on the 2nd of April, the members
of the Assembly who were charged to lay its offer
before Frederick "William arrived at Berlin, they were
received with such cordiality by Brandenburg that it
was believed the King's consent had been won. The
reply of the King to the deputation on the _^^.
following day rudely dispelled these hopes. SSiSai^
He declared that before he could accept the ^'^ ''
Crown not only must he be summoned to it by the
Princes of Germany, but the consent of all the Govern-
ments must be given to the Constitution. In other
words, he required that the Assembly should sur-
render its claims to legislative supremacy, and abandon
all those parts of the Federal Constitution of which any
13* MODEBM SWBOPB. lam.
of the existing GoTeroments disapproved. As it was
certain that Austria and the four minor kingdoms would
never agree to any Federal union worthy of the name,
and that the Assembly could not now, without re-
nouncing its past, admit that the right of framing
the Constitution lay outside itself, the answer of tlie
King was understood to amount to a refusal. The
deputation lefb Berlin in the sorrowful conviction that
their mission had failed ; and a note which was soon
afterwards received at Frankfort from the King showed
that this belief was correct.*
The answer of King Frederick William proved in-
deed much more than that he had refused the Crown
-^ »- ^__. of Germany ; it proved that he would
rfbriii. i>ot accept the Constitution which the
Assembly had enacted. The full import of
this determination, and the serious nature of the cribis
now impending over Germany, were at once under-
stood. Though twenty-eight Governments successively
accepted the Constitution, these were without exception
petty States, and their united forces would scarcely
have been a match for one of its more powerful enemies.
On the 6th. of April the Austrian Cabinet declared
the Assembly to have been guilty of illegality in pub-
lishing the Constitution, and called upon all Austrian
deputies to quit Frankfort. The Prussian Lower
Chamber, elected under the King's recent edict, having
• Brief wechsel FriedrtchWiDielms, pp. 2S3, 269. Beee]er,87. Bieder.
■imiiii,L388. Wi>genor,Polim[FriedriehWUhelmIT^p.6S. BrnstlL,
u» THB ASSSUBLT AND TBS QOVSB.SMESTB. . 1S5
protested against the state of siege in Berlin, and having
passed a resolntion in favour of the Frankfort Constitu-
tion, was forthwith dissolved. Within the Frankfort
Parliament the resistance of Governments excited a
patriotic resentment and caused for the moment a union
of parties. Resolutions were passed declaring that the
Assembly would adhere to the Constitution. A Com-
mittee was charged with the ascertainment of measures
to be adopted for enforcing its reci^nition ; and a note
was addressed to all the hostile Governments demand-
ing that they should abstain from proroguing or dis-
solving the representative bodies within their dominions
with the view of suppressing the free utterance of
opinions in favour of the Constitution.
On the ground of this last demand the Prussian
official Press now began to denounce the Assembly of
Frankfort ■as a revolutionary body. The situation of
affairs daily became worse. It was in vain
J End of tb« Qm<-
that the Assembly appealed to the Govern- SS^biJ'j^
ments, the legislative Chambers, the local
bodies, the whole German people, to bring the Constitution
into effect. The moral force on which it had determined
to rely proved powerless, and in despair of conquering the
Governments by public opinion the more violent mem-
bers of the democratic party determined to appeal to
insurrection. On the 4th of May a popular rising
began at Dresden, where the King, under the influence
of Prussia, had dismissed those of bis Ministers who
urged him to accept the Constitution, and had dissolved
his Parliament. The ontbreak drove the £iii2.froin,
".OOglf
IM UODEEN SUROFS. IM
his capital ; bat only five days had passed when a
Prussian army-corps entered the city and crushed the
rebellion. In this interval, short as it was, there had
been indications that the real leaders of the insurrection
were fighting not for the Fraukfort Constitution but
for a Republic, and that in the event of tlieir victory a
revolutionary Government, connected with French and
Polish schemes of subversion, would come into power.
In Baden this was made still clfarer. There the
Government of the Qnind Duke had actually accepted
the Frankfort Constitution, and had ordered elections
to be held for the Federal legislative body by which
the Assembly was to be succeeded. Insurrection
nevertheless broke out. The Republic was openly pro-
claimed; the troops joined the insurgents ; and a Pro-
visional Goveninient allied itself with a similar body
that had sprung into being with the help of French and
Polish refugees in the neighbouring Palatinate. Con-
scious that those insurrections must utterly ruin its own
cause, the Frankfort Assembly on the suggestion of
Gagern called upon the Archduke John to suppress them
by force of arms, and at the same time to protect the
free expression of opinion on behalf of the Constitution
where threatened by Governments. John, who had
long clung to his office only to further the ends of
Austria, refused to do so, and Gagern in consequence
resigned. With his fall ended the real political ex-
istence of the Assembly. In reply to a resolution
which it passed on the 10th of May, calling upon John
to employ ^1 the forces of Germany in del'euce of the
um. SM) Of Tna OSRMAN ITATIOtfAl AB3SMBLT. 137
Constitntion, the Archduke placed a mock-Ministry in
office. The Prussian Government, declaring the vote of
the 1 0th of May to be a summons to civil war, ordered all
Prussian deputies to withdraw from the Assembly, and
a few days later its example was imitated by Saiony
and Hanover. On the 20th of May sixty-five of the
best known of the members, including Aradt and Dahl-
mann, placed on record their belief that in the actual
situation the re.linquishment of the task of the Assembly
was the least of evils, and declared their work at Frank-
fort ended. Other groups followed them till there
remained only the party of the extreme Left, which had
hitherto been a weak minority, and which in no sense
represented the real opinions of Germany. This Uurap-
Parliament, troubling itself little with John and his
Ministers, determined to withdraw from Frankfort,
wlicre it dreaded the appearance of Prussian troops,
into Wurtemberg, where it might expect some support
from the revolutionary Governments of liuden and the
Palatinate. On the 6th of June a hundred and five
deputies assembled at Stuttgart. There they proceeded
to appoint a governing Committee for all Gerinany,
calling upon the King of Wurteraberg to supply Ihem
with seven thousand soldiers, and sending out cmissancs
to stir up the neighbouring population. But the world
disregarded them. The Governnicnt at Stuttgart, after
an interval of patience, hade them begone; and on the
ISth of June their hall was closed iigaliist tliem and
they were dispersed by troops, no one rai>;in!:f a linnd on
their behalf. The overthi-ow of the insurgents who
138 XODBSN SUSOPS. iM
had taken up arma in Baden and the Palatinate was
not 80 eaay a matter. A campaign of six weets was
necessary, in which the army of Prussia,
^^T 1^, Id hy the Crown Prince, sustained some
reverses, before the Republican levies were
crushed, and with the fall of Bastadt the insurrection
was brought to a close.*
The end of the German Parliament, on which the
nation had set such high hopes and to which it had
sent so much of what was noblest in itself, contrasted
lamentably with the splendour of its opening. Whether
a better result would have been attained if, instead of
claiming supreme authority in the construction of
Federal union, the Assembly had from the first sought
the co-operation of the Governments, must remain matter
of conjecture. Austria would under all circumstances
have been the great hindrance in the way ; and after
the failure of the efforts made at Frankfort to establish
the general union of Germany, Austria was able com-
pletely to frustrate the attempts which were now made
at Berlin to establish partial union upon a different
basis. In notifying to the Assembly his refusal of
the Imperial Crown, King Frederick Wil-
to^ft™^"!* iiam had stated that he was resolved to place
himself at the head of a Federation to be
formed by States voluntarily uniting with him under
terms to be subsequently arranged ; and in a circular
note addressed to the German Governments he invited ,
• Verhandliingen, ifl, U. ,6695, 6886. Hajm, iil. 185. Bambaraw,
Erlebniaae, p. 6.
UK T3B LSAOWa OF TBB TEBES KIKODOMB. 139
such as were disposed to take counsel with Prussia to
unite in Conference ac Berlin. The opening of the
Conference was fixed for the 17th of May. Two days
before this the King issued a proclamation to the Frus-
sian people announcing that in apite of the fiulure of
the Assemhly of Frankfort a G-erman union was still to
be forined. When the Conference opened at .Berlin,
no envoys appeared but those of Austria, Saxony,
Hanover, and Bavaria. The Austrian representative
withdrew at the end of the first sitting, the Bavarian
rather later, leaving Prussia to lay such foaudations as it
could for German unity with the temporising support
of Saxony and Hanover. A confederation was formed,
known as the League of the Three Kingdoms. An
undertaking was given that a Federal Parliament
should be summoned, and that a Constitution should be
made jointly by this Parliament and the Governments
(May 26th). On the 11th of June the draft of a
Federal Constitution was published. As the King of
Prussia was apparently acting in good faith, and the
draft-Constitution in spite of some defects seemed to
afford a fair basis for union, the question now arose among
the leaders of the German national movement whether
the twenty-eight States wliich had accepted the ill-fated
Constitution of Frankfort ought or ought not to enter
the new Prussian League. A meeting of a hundred
and fifty ei-members of the Frankfort Parliiimnnt was
held at Gotha ; and although great indignation was ex-
pressed by the more democratic faction, it was determined
thai the scheme now put forward by Prussia deserved
140 UODS&lf SUItOPa. ttlB.
a fair trial. The whole of the twenty-eight minor States
consequently entered the League, which thus embraced
all Germany with the exception of Austria, Bavana and
Wiirtembei^. But the Courts of Saxony and Hanover
had from the first been acting with duplicity. The
military influence of Prussia, and the fear which tbey
still felt of their own subjects, bad prevented tbem from
offering open resistance to the renewed work of FederSi-
tion ; but they had throughout been in communication
with Austria, and were only waiting for the moment
when the complete restoration of Austria's military
strength should enable them to display their true
colours. During the spring of 1849, while tbe
Conferences at Berlin were being held, Austria was still
occupied with Hungary and Venice. The final over-
throw of these enemies enabled it to cast its entire
weight upon Germany. The result was seen in the
action o£ Hanover and Saxony, which now formally
seceded from the Federation. Prussia thus remained
at the end of 1849 with no support but that of the
twenty-eight minor States. Against it, in open or in
tacit antagonism to the establishment of Germaa unity
m any effective form, the four secondary Kingdoms
stood ranged by the side of Austria.
It was not until the 20th of March, 1850, that the
Federal Parliament, which had been proimsed ten
months before on the incorporation of the
new League, assembled at Erfurt. In the
meantime reaction had gone far in many a German
State. In Prussia, after the dissolution o£ the Ijower
Chatnbw on April 27th, 1849, the Eing had abrogated
the electoral proTisions of the Oonstitation so recently
granted by himself, and had substituted for them a
system based on the representation of classes. Treating
this act as a breach of faith, the Democratic party'
had abstained from Toting at the elections, with the
result that in the Berlin Parliament of 1850 Con-
servatives, Eeactionists, and oflSciaU formed the great
majority. The revision of the Prussian Constitution,
promised at first as a concession to Liberalism, was
conducted in the opposite sense. The King demanded
the strengthening of monarchical power; the Feudal-
ists, going iar beyond him, attacked the municipal and
social reforms of the last two years, and sought to lead
Prussia back to the system of its mediaeval estates. It
was in the midst of this victory of reaction in Prussia
that the Federal Parliament at Erfurt began its sittings.
Though the moderate Liberals, led by Gagern and
other tried politicians of Frankfort, held the majority
in both Houses, a strong Absolutist party from
Prussia confronted them, and it soon became clear
that the. Prussian Government was ready to play
into the haodB of this party. The draft of
the Federal Constitution, which had been
made at Berlin, was presented, according
to the undertaking of May 26th, 1849, to the Erfurt
Afisembly. Aware of the gathering strength of the
r<action and of the danger of delay, the Liberal majority
declared itself ready to pass the draft into law with-
out a single alteration. The reactionary minority
hmWc
The UbIoii P«p.
linmi-nt lit Kr.
fiut,Mu(!h,lua.
142 MODERN EUBOPB. uso.
demanded that a revision should take place ; and, to
the Bcandal of all who understood the methods or
the spirit of Parliamentary role, the Prussian Minis-
ters united with the party which demanded altera-
tions in the project which they themselves had hronght
forward. A compromise was ultimately ■ effected ; but
the action of the Court of Prussia and the conduct
of its Ministers throughout the £r£urt dehates struck
with deep despondency those who had believed that
Frederick William might still effect the work in which
the Assembly of Frankfort had failed. The trust in
the King's sincerity or consistence of purpose sank low.
The sympathy of the national Liberal party throughout
Germany was to a great extent alienated from Prossia ;
while, if any expectation existed at Berlin that the
adoption of a' reactionary policy would disarm the hos-
tility of the Austrian Government to the new League,
this hope was wliolly vain and baseless.*
Austria had from the first protested against the
attempt of the King of Prussia to establish aoy new
form of union in Germany, and had declared that it
jj_,j,^ ^ would recognise none of the conclilsions of
*"**■ the Federal Parliament of Erfurt. Accord-
ing to the theory now advanced by the Cabinet of
Vienna the ancient Federal Constitution of Germany
was still in force. All that had happened since March,
1848, was so much wan^n and futile mischief-making.
The disturbance of order had at length come to an end,
• TraliaiidlDiigeii m Erfoit, L 114; il. 143. Biedemuan, L 469.
Badowifas iL 138.
and with the exit of the rioters the legitimate powers
re-eatered into their rights. Accordingly, there could
be no question of the establishment of new Leagues.
The old relation of all the German States to one
another under the ascendency of Austria remained in
full strength ; the Diet of Frankfort, which had merely
suspended its functions and by no means suffered ex-
tinction, was still the legitimate central authority.
Tbat some modifications might be necessary in the
ancient Constitution was the most tbat Austria was
willing to admit. This, however, was an affair not for
the German people hut for its rulers, and Austria ac-
cordingly inrited all the Governments to Sf Congress
at Fraakfort, where the changes necessary might be
discussed. In reply to this summons, Prussia strenuously
denied that the old Federal Constitution was still in
existence. The princes of the numerous petty States
which were included in the new Union assembled at
Berlin round Frederick Wilham, and resolved that
they would not attend the Conference at Frankfort
except under reservations and conditions which Austria
would not admit. Arguments and counter-ai^uments
were exchanged ; bat the controversy between an old
and a new Germany was one to be decided by force of
will or force of arms, not by political logic. The
stru^le was to be one between Prussia and Austria,
and the Austrian Cabinet had. well gauged the temper
of its opponent. A direct summons to submission
would have roused all the King's pride, and have been
answered by war. Befor« demanding from Frederick
144 UODSRN EjmOFa. IM
William tlie dissolution of the tinion which he had
foonded, Schwarzenberg determined to fix upon a quarrel
in which the King shonld he perplexed or alarmed at
the results of his own policy. The dominant convic-
tion in the mjpd of Frederick William was that of the
Banctity of monarchical rule. If the League of Berlin
could he committed to some enterprise hostile to mon-
archical power, and could he charged with an alliance
with rebellion, Frederick William would probably falter
in his resolutions, and a resort to arms, for which,
however. Austria was well prepared, would become
unnecessary.*
Among the States whose Governments had been
forced by public opinion to join the new Federation
was the Electorate of Hesse-Cassel. The Elector was,
like his predecessors, a thorough despot at
heart, and chafed under the restrictions
which a constitutional system imposed apon his rule.
Acting under Austrian instigation, he dismissed his
Ministers in the spring of 1850, and placed in office
one Hassenpflug, a type of the worst and most violent
class of petty tyrants produced by the officialiBm of
s. Hassenpflug immediately
eA at Cassel, and twice dis-
le proceeded to levy taxes by
[eclared his acts ill^al; the
iialled on for assistance, b^an
Beden Friadrioh TPllIielma, It. p. SS,
150, pp. 26, &a Beoa^ ErinnenngeD,
, TIv Moiikt^ p. 41
MML AVBTRIA SE8T0BBS TBS DIET OF FRANKFORT. \4&
to resign. The conflict between the Minister and the
Hessian population was in full progress when, at the
be^nning of September, Austria with its vassal Qovem-
ments proclaimed the re-establishment of the Diet of
Frankfort. Though Prussia and most of the twenty-
eight States confederate with it treated this announce-
ment as null and void, the Diet, constituted by the
envoys of Austria, the four minor Kingdoms, and a few
secedera from the Prussian Union, com- .^^pj^^
menced its sittings. To the Diet the S3^S!s<iFt.,
Elector .of Hesse forthwith appealed for
help against his subjects, and the decision was given
that the refusal of the Hessian Estates to grant the
taxes was an oSence justifying the intervention of the
central power. Fortified by this judgment, Hassenpflug
now ordered that every person offering resistance to the
Government should be tried by court-martial. He was
baffled by the resignation of the entire body of officers
in the Hessian army ; and as this completed the dis-
comfitnre of the Elector, the armed intervention of
Austria, as identified with the Diet of Frankfort, now
became a certainty. But to the protection of the
people of Hesse in their constitutional rights Prussia,
as chief of the Iieague which Hesse had joined, stood
morally pledged. It remained for the King to decide
between armed resistance to Austria or the humiliation
of a total abandonment of Prussia's claim p„,^,^
to leadership in any German union. Con- -^""^
flicting influences swayed the King in one direction and
another. The friends of Austria and of absolutism
IM MODB&IT SUBOPB. mt.
declared tbat the employment of the Prussian army on
behalf of the Hessians would make the King an accom-
plice of revolution ; the bolder and more patriotic spirits
protested against the abdication of Prussia's just claims
and the evasion of its responsibilities towards Germany.
For a moment the party of action, led by the Crown
Prince, gained the ascendant. General Radowitz,
the projector of the Union, was called to the Foreign
Ministry, and Prussian troops entered Hesse. Austria
now ostentatiously prepared for war. Frederick Wil-
liam, terrified by the danger confronting him, yet un-
willing to yield all, sought the mediation of the Czar
of Kussia. Hicholas came to Warsaw, where the Em-
peror of Austria and Prince Charles, brother
m^ungroS^ of the King of Prussia, attended by the
Ministers of their States, met him. The
closest family ties united the Courts of St. Petersburg
and Berlin ; but the Russian sovereign was still the
putron of Austria as he had been in the Hungarian
caiii[iaign. He resented the action of Prussia in
Schleswig - Holstein, and was oflended that King
Frederick William had not presented himself at War-
saw in person. He declared in favour of all Austria's
demands, and treated Count Brandenburg with such
indignity that the Count, a high-spirited patriot,
never recovered from its effect. He returned to Berlin
only to give in his report and die, Manteuffel, Minister
of the Interior, assured the King that the Prussian
army was so weak in numbers and so defective in
orgftuisation that, if it took the field gainst Austria
Mb. OLM&PZ. 147
aod its ^lies, it irould meet with certain mm. Bavarian
troops, representing the Diet of Fraokfort, now entered
Hesse at Aastria'a bidding, and stood face to face with
the Pmssians. The moment had come when the de-
cision must be ipade between peace and war. At a
Coundl held at Berlin on November 2ud the peace-
party carried the King with them. Badowitz gave
up office ; Manteuffel, the Minister of repression
within and of submission without, was set at the head
of the Government. The meaning of his appointment
was well understood, and with each new proof of the
weakness of the King the tone of the Court of Austria
became more imperious. On the 9th of November
Sdiwarzenbeig categorically demanded the dissolution
of the Prussian Union, the recognition of the Federal
Diet, and the evacuation of Hesse bj the Prussian
troops. The first point was at once conceded, and in
hollow, equivocating language Manteuffel made the fact
known to the members of the Confederacy. The other
conditions not being so speedily fulfilled, Schwarzen-
berg set Austrian regiments in motion, and demanded
the withdrawal of the Prussian troops &om Hesse
within twenty-four hours. Manteuffel begged the
Austrian Minister for an interview, and, without wait-
ing for an answer, set out for Olmiitz. His instructions
bade him to press for certain concessions ; none of these
did he obtain, and he made the necessary w...t-riM ^
submission without them. On the 29th of o"^*^"-*
November a convention was signed at Olmiitz, in which
Prussia rect^nised the German Federal Constitution
148 MODERif EUBOFB. am.
of 181S as still existing, undertook to withdraw all
its troops from Hesse with the exception of a single
battalion, and consented to the settlement of affairs both
in Hesse and in Schleswig-Holstein by the Federal
Diet. One point alone in the scheme of the Austrian
statesman was wanting among the fruits of his Tictory
at Olmiitz and of the negotiations at Dresden by which
this was followed. Schwarzenberg had intended that
the entire Austrian Empire should enter the German
Federation ; and if he had had to reckon with no oppo-
nents but the beaten and humbled Prussia, he would
have effected his design. But the prospect of a central
European Power, with a population of seventy millions,
controlled as this would virtually be by the Cabinet of
Yienna, alarmed other nations. England declared that
such a combination would undo the balance of power in
Europe and menace the independence of Germany ;
France protested in more threatening terms ; and the
project fell to the ground, to be remembered only as
the boldest ima^nation of a statesnuan for whom
fortune, veiling the !N^emesis in store, seemed to set no
limit to its favours.
The cause of Schleswig-Holstein, so intimately
bound up with the efforts of the Germans towards
national union, sank with the failure of
these efforts ; and in the final humiliation of
Prussia it received what might well seem its death-
blow. The armistice of Malm6, which was sanc-
tioned by the Assembly of Frankfort in the autumn of
1848, lasted until March 26th, 1849. War was then
tM BOBLESWJO'BOtBTBJS. 149
recommenced bj Prassia, and the lines of DGppel
were stormed by its troops, while the volunteer forces
of Schleswig-Koktein uiiBuccessfuIly laid siege to Frede-
ricia. Hostilities had coDtinued for three months, when
a second armistice, to lat^t for a year, and Preliminaries
of Peace, were agreed upon. At the conclusion of this
armistice, in July, 1850, Prussia, in the name of Ger-
many, made peace with Denmark. The inhabitants of
the Duchies in consequence continued the war for
themselves, aud though defeated with great loss at
Idstedt on the 24th of July, they remained uncon-
quered at the end of the year. This was the situation
of affairs when Prassia, by the Treaty of Olmiitz, agreed
that the restored Federal Diet should take upon itself
the restoration of order in Schleswig-Holstein, and that
the troops of Prussia should unite with those of Austria
to enforce its decrees. To the Cabinet of Vienna, the
foe in equal measure of German national union and of
every democratic cause, the Schleswig-Holsteiners were
simply rebels in insurrection against their sovereign.
They were required by the Diet, under Austrian dicta-
tion, to lay down their arms ; and commissioners from
Austria and Prussia entered the Ducliies to compel
them to do so. Against Denmark, Austria, aud Pru.>iyia
together, it was impossible for Schleswig-Holstein to
prolong its resistance. The army was dissolved, and
the Duchies were handed over to the King of Denmark,
to return to the legal status which was defined in the
Treaties of Peace. This was the nominal condition of
the transfer; bat the Danish Government treated
160 MODERN BUBOPS. ma.
Schleswig ae part of its national territory, tuid ia
the nortliem part of the Duchy the process of sah-
etituting Danish for German nationality was actively
pursued. The policy of foreign Courts, little interested
in the wish of the inhabitants, had from the beginning'
of the struggle of the Duchies against Denmark favoured
the maintenance and consolidation of the Danish Kiog-
dom. The claims of the Duke of Augustenburg, as
next heir to the Duchies in the male Hoe, were not
considered worth the risk of a new war; and by a
protocol signed at London on the 2nd of August, 1850,
the Powers, with the exception of Prussia, declared
themselves in favour of a single rule of succession in all
parts of the Danish State. By a Treaty of the 8th of
May, 1852, to which Prussia gave its assent, the pre-
tensions of all other claimants to the disputed succession
were set aside, and Prince Christian, of the House of
Gliicksburg, was declared heir to the throne, the rights
of the German Federation as established by the Treaties
of 1815 being reserved. In spite of this reservation
of Federal rights, and of the stipulations in favour of
Schleswig and Holstein made in the earlier agreements,
the Duchies appeared to be now practically united with
the Danish State. Prussia, for a moment their cham-
pion, had joined with Austria in coercing their army,
in dissolving their Government, in annulling the legis-
lation by which the Parliament of Frankfort bad made
them participators in public rights thenceforward to be
the inheritance of all Germans. A page in the national
histoiy was obliterated ; Prussia had tarned its back on
......Google
m. BOBLBSWia-HOLBTBIN. Ul
its own professions ; there remained but one relic from
the time when the whole German people seemed so ardent
for the emancipation of its brethren beyond the frontier.
The national fleet, created bj the Assembly of Frankfort
for the prosecution of the straggle with Denmark, atiU
lay at the mouth of tlte Elbe. But the same power
which had determined that Germany was not to be a
nation had also determined that it could have no
national raaritime interests. After all that __^
had passed, authority had little call to be STtTSi.
nice about appearances; and the national
fieet was sold by auction, in accordance with a decree
of the restored Diet of Frankfort, in the summer of
1852.«
It was with deep disappointment and humiliation
that the Liberals of Germany, and all in whom the
hatred of democratic change had not overpowered the
love of eountiy, witnessed the issue of the aBni«iw«*i«
movement of 1848. In so far as that move- *
ment was one. directed towards national anion it had
totally failed, and the state of things that had existed
before 1848 was restored without change. As a move-
ment of constitutional and social reform, it had not
been so entirely vain ; nor in this respect can it be said
that Germany after the year 1848 returned altogether
to what it was before it. Many of the leading figures
of the earlier time re-appeared indeed with more or
less of lustre upon the stage. Mettemich though
• Einst n., L 377. Hwtolet^ Utp of Eoiope, U. 1106, 1129, llKt
Fari.Pftpen.lSHsb^)!'^' 18H Ixr., ]^ 30^ 187.
L ,i,z<,.f,GoogIf
152 MODSRN EITROFE. UM-tsi
excluded from office by younger men, beamed upon
Vienna with the serenity of a prophet who had lived to
see most of his enemies shot and of a martyr who had
returned to one of the most enviable Salons in Europe.
No dynasty lost its throne, no class of the population
had been struck down with proscription as were the
clergy and the nobles of Prance fifty years before. Yet
the traveller familiar with Germany before the revolu-
tion found that much of the old had now vanished,
much of a new world come into being. It was not
sought by the re-established Governments to undo at
one stroke the whole of the political, the social, the
agrarian legislation of the preceding time, as in some
other periods of reaction. The nearest approach that
was made to this was in a decree of the Diet annulling
the Declaration of Rights drawn up by the Frankfort
Assembly, and requiring the Governments to bring into
conformity with the Federal Constitution all laws and
institutions made since the beginning of 1848. Parlia-
mentary government was thereby enfeebled, but not
necessarily extinguished. Governments narrowed the
franchise, curtailed the functions of representative
assemblies, filled these with their creatures, coerced
voters at elections ; but, except in Austria, there was
no open abandonment of constitutional forms. In some
States, as in Saxony under the reactionary rule of Count
Beust, the system of national representation established
in 1848 was abolished and the earlier Estates were re-
vived ; in Prussia the two Houses of Parliament con-
tinued in existence, but in such dependence upon the
CooVc
VM-mat, PBUBSIA UNBEB MANTEUFFEL. 158
Tojal authority, and under such strong pressure oE an
aristocratic and official reaction, that, after struggling
for some years in the Lower House, the Liberal leaders
at length withdrew in despair. The chardcter which
GoTemment now assunti d in Prussia was indeed far
more typical of the condition of Germany at large than
■was the bold and uncompromising despotism of PriDCe
Schwarzenberg in Austria. Manteuffel, in whora the
Prussian epoch of reaction was symbolised, was not a
crnel or a violent Minister; but his rule was stamped
with a peculiar' and degrading meanness, more irritating
to those who suffered under it than harsher wrong. In
his hands government was a thing of eavesdropping
and espionage, a system of petty persecution, a school
of subservience and hypocrisy. He had been the instru-
ment at Olmutz of such a surrender of national honour
and national interests as few nations have ever endured
with the chances of war still untried. This surrender
may, in the actual condition of the Prussian army, have
been necessary, but the abasement of it seemed to cling
to Manteuffel and to lower all his conceptions of govern-
ment. Even where the conclusions of his policy were
correct they seemed to have been reached by some
unworthy process. Like Germany at lai^, Prui^sia
breathed uneasily under an oppression which was every-
where felt and yet was hard to define. Its best elements
were those which suffered the most : its highest intel-
lectual and political aims were those which most ex-
cited the suspicion of the Government. Its King
bad lost whatever was stimulating or elevate^ in his
lU MODSBN EUROPE. u»mi
illusiotiB. From him do second alliance with Liberal-
ism, 00 further effort on behalf of German unity, was to
be expected : the hope for Germany and for Prussia,
if hope there was, lay in a future reign.
The powerlessness of Prussia was the measure of
Austrian influence and prestige. The contrast pre-
sented by Austria in 184S and Austria in 1S51 was
indeed one that might well arrest political observera.
Its recovery had no doubt been effected partly by
foreign aid, and in the struggle with the Magyars a
Austrinkfia dangerous obligation had been incurred to-
""■ wards Bussia ; but scarred and riven as the
fabric was within, it was complete and imposing without.
Not one of the enemies who in 1848 had risen against
the Court of Vienna now remained standing. "In Italy,
Austria bad won back what had appeared to be hope-
lessly lost ; in Germany it had more than vindicated its
old claims. It had thrown its rival to the ground, and
ihe full measure of its ambition was perhaps even yet
not satisfied. " First to humiliate Prussia, then to
destroy it," was the expression in which Schwarzenberg
summed up his German policy. Whether, with his
undoubted firmness and daring, the Minister possessed
the intellectual qualities and the experience necessary
for the successful administration of an Empire built up,
as Austria now was, on violence and on the suppression
of every national force, was doubted even by his ad-
mirers. The proof, however, was not granted to him,
for a sudden death carried him off in his fourth yeai of
power (April 6th, 1852). Weaker men sucoeeded to hia
u»JML AUSTRIA. Ib5
taik. The epoch of military and diplomatic triumph
was now ending, the gloomier side of the reaction stood
ont unrelieved by any new succcetsion of victories.
Financial disorder grew worse and worse. Clericalism
ctairoed its bond from the monarchy which it had
helped to restore. In the stru^le of the nationalities
of Austria against the central authority the Bishops
bad on the whole thrown their influence on to the side
of the Crown. The restored despotism owed too much
to their help and depended too much on their continued
goodwill to be able to refuse their demands- Thus the
new centralised administratiou, reproducing in general
the uniformity of governraent attempted by the Em-
peror Joseph II,, contrasted with this in its subservience
to clerical power. Ecclesiastical laws and jurisdictions
were allowed to encroach on the laws and jurisdiction
of the State ; education was made over to the priest-
hood; within the Church itself the bishops were allowed
to rule uncontrolled. The very Minister who had taken
office under Schwarzenberg as the representative of the
modem (spirit, to which tlie Government
still professed to render homage, became jmdu, e«i* is,
the instrument of an act of submission to
the Papacy which marked the lowest point to which
Austrian policy fell. Alexander Bach, a prominent
Liberal in Vienna at the beginning of 1848, had ac-
cepted office at the price of his independence, and
surrendered himself to the aristocratic and clerical
influences that dominated the Court. Consistent only
in his efforts to simplify the forms of government, to
IM liOBE&S BUEOFS. immb»
promote the ascendency of German over all other ele-
ments in the State, to maintain the improvement in the
peasant's condition effected hj the Parliament of Krem-
sier. Bach, as Minister of the Interior, made war in all
other respects on his own earlier principles. In the
former representative of the Liberalism of the profes-
sional classes in Vienna absolutism had now its most effi-
cient instrument ; and the Concordat negotiated by Bach
with the Papacy in 1855 marked the definite submis-
sion of Austria to the ecclesiastical pretensions which
in these years of political languor and discouragement
gained increasiogrecognition throughout Central Europe.
Ultramontanism had Fought allies in many political
camps since the revolution of 1848. It had dallied in
some countries with Republicanism ; but its truer in-
stincts divined in the victory of absolutist systems its
own surest gain. Accommodations between the Papacy
and several of the German Governments were made in
the years succeeding 1S49; and from the centralised
despotism of the Emperor Francis Joseph the Church
won concessions which since tbe time of Maria Theresa
it had in vain sought from any ruler of the Austrian
State.
The European drama which began in 1848 had
more of unity and more of concentration in its opening
than in its close. In Italy it ends with the fall
^^ of Venice ; in Germany the interest lingers
'**■ till the days of Olmiitz ; in France there
is no decisive hreak in the action until the Coup d'Etat
which, at th^ end o{ the year 1851, made Louis
Napoleon in all but name Emperor of Prance. The six
million votes which had raised Louis Napoleon to the Pre-
sidency of the Bepublic might well have filled with alarm
all who hoped for a future of constitutional rule ; yet the
warning conveyed by the election seems to have been
understood by but few. As the representative of order
and authority, as the declared enemy of Socialism, Louis
Napoleon was on the same side as the Far-
liamentary majority ; he had even been
supported in bis candidature by Parliamentary leaders
socb as M. Thiers. His victory was welcomed as a
victory over Socialism and the Ked Republic ; be had
received some patronage from the official party of order,
and it was expected that, as nominal chief of the State,
he would act as the instrument of this party. He was
an adventurer, but an adventurer with so little that was
imposing about him, that it scarcely occurred to men of
influence in Paris to credit him with the capacity for
mischief. His mean look and spiritless address, the
absurdities of his past, the insignificance of his political
friends, caused him to be regarded - during his first
months of public life with derision rather than with
fear. The French, said M. Thiers long afterwards,
made two mistakes about Louis Napoleon: the first
when they took him for a fool, the second when they
took him for a man of genius. It was not until the
appearance of the letter to Colonel Ney, in which the
President ostentatiously separated himself from his
Ministers and emphasised bis personal will in the
direction of the foreign policy of France, that suspicions
IM MODERN BUSOPB. um.
of danger to the Bcpublic from hie ambition arose.
From this time, in the narrow circle of the Ministers
whom official duty brought into direct contact with the
President, a constant sense of insecarity and dread of
some new surprise on his part prevailed, though the
accord which had been broken by the letter to Colonel
Ney was for a while outwardly re-established, and the
forms of Parliamentary government remained unim-
paired.
The first year of Louis Napoleon's term of office
woe drawing to a close when a message from him was
delivered to the Assembly which seemed to announce
an immediate attack upon the Constitution. The
Ministry in office was composed of men of high Parlia-
mentary position ; it enjoyed the entire confidence of a
wwnrfTM great majority in the Assembly, and had
"*"* enforced with at least sufficient energy the
measures of public security which the President and
the conntiy seemed agreed in demanding. Suddenly,
on the Slst of October, the President announced to the
Assembly by a message carried by one of his aides-de-
camp that the Ministry were dismissed. The reason
assigned for their dismissal was the want of unity within
the Cabinet itself ; but the language used by the Presi-
dent announced much more than a ministerial change.
" I^ance, in the midst of confusion, seeks for the hand,
the will of him whom it elected on the 10th of Decem-
ber. The victory won on that day was the victory of a
system, for the name of Napoleon is in itself a pro-
gramme. It signifies order, authority, religion, national
im lOUm NAPOLSOS. 159
prosperi^ within ; national dignity withoat. It is this
policy, inaugurated by my election, that I desire to
carry to triumph with the support of the Assembly and
of tlie people.'* In order to save the Eepublic from
anarchy, to maintain the prestige of France among
other nations, the President declared that he needed
men of action rather than of words ; yet when the list
of the new Ministers appeared, it contained scarcely a
Bingle name of weight. Lonis Napoleon had called to
oSice persons whose very obscurity had marked them as
his own instruments, and guaranteed to him the as-
cendency which he had not hitherto possessed within
the Cabinet. Satisfied with having given this proof of
his power, he resumed the appearance of respect, if not
of cordiality, towards the Assembly. He had learnt to
beware of precipitate action ; above two years of office
were still before him ; and he had now done enough to
make it clear to all who were disposed to seek their
fortunes in a new political cause that their services on
his behalf wonld be welcomed, and any excess of zeal
more than pardoned. From this time there grew up a
party which had for its watchword the exaltation of
Louis Napoleon and the derision of the methods of
Parliamentary government. Journalists, unsucces-slul
politicians, adventurers of every description, were en-
listed in the ranks of this obscure but active band.
For their acts and their utterances no one was respon-
sible but themselves. They were disavowed without
compunction when their hardihood went too far; but
their ventures brought them no peril, and the generositi
160 MODBBN SUROPS. mil
of the President was not wanting to those who in-
sisted on serving him in spite of himself.
France was still trembling with the shock of the
Four Days of June ; and measures of repression
formed the common ground upon which Louis Napo-
leon and the Assembly met without fear of conflict.
Certain elections which were held in the spring of
1850, and which gave a striking victory in Paris and
elsewhere to Socialist or Ultra-Democratic candidates,
revived the alarms of the owners of property, and
inspired the fear that with universal sufirage the
Legislature itself might ultimately fall into the
hands of the Red Kepublicans. The principle of uni-
versal suffrage had been proclaimed almost by acci-
dent in the midst of the revolution of 1848. It had
been embodied in the Constitution of that year because
it was found already in existence. No party had
seriously considered the conditions under which it was
to be exercised, or had weighed the political qualifica-
tions of the mass to whom it was so lightly thrown.
When election after election returned to the Chamber
men whose principles were held to menace society itself,
the cry arose that France must be saved from the hands
of the vile multitude ; and the President called upon a
Committee of the Assembly to frame the necessary
measures of electoral reform. Within a
FrMo^rSur week the work of the Committee was com-
pleted, and the law which it had drafted
was brought before the Assembly. It was proposed
that, instead of a residence of six months, a continuous
M& tlMITATIOS or tHE FSAITCBISM. l6l
residence of three years in the same coramane should
be required of every voter, and that the fQifilment of this
condition should be proved, not by ordinary evidence,
bat by one of certain specified acts, such as the pay-
ment of personal taxes. With modifications of little
importance the Bill was passed by the Assembly.
Whether its real effect was foreseen even by those who
desired the greatest possible limitation of the franchise
is doubtful ; it is certain that many who supported it
believed, in their ignorance of the practical working of
electoral laws, that they were excluding from the fran-
chise only the vagabond and worthless class which
has no real place within the body politic When the
electoral Usts drawn up in pursuance of the measure
appeared, they astounded all parties alike. Three out of
the ten mLlliona of voters in France were disfranchised.
Not only the inhabitants of whole quarters in the great
cities but the poorer classes among the peasantry
throughout Pmnce had disappeared from the electoral
body. The Assembly had at one blow converted into
enemies the entire mass of the population that Uved by
the wages of bodily labour. It had committed an act
of political suicide, and had given to a man so little
troubled with scruples of honour as Louis Napoleon
the fatal opportunity of appealing to France as the
champion of national sovereignty and the vindicator
of universal suffrage against an Assembly which had
mutilated it in the interests of class.*
• HsMpas, U^moiTSB, L 176. (Envrea de Napoleon III., iiL 271. Bar-
rot, ir. 21. Qnnier de Casaagrwe, GhnU, de Ijoais Philippe, ii. 128 ; B£dt
completip.l. Jerrold,Ni^eoiiIIL,iii.203. TooqneviUo, Oomapb iL 17&
in MODBBN SUBOPS. utt.
The duration of the Presidency was fixed by the
CoDstitntion of 184S at four years, and it was enacted
that the President should not be re-eligible to his
pj^__^^ dignity. By the operation of certain laws
idn&Nmpoinn. jjuperfectly adjusted to one another, the
tenure of office by Lonis Napoleon expired on the 8th
of May, 1852, while the date for the dissolution of the
Assembly fell within a few weeks of this day. Prance
was therefore threatened with the dangers attending
the almost simultaneous extinction of all authority.
The perils of 1852 loomed only too visibly before the
country, and Louis Napoleon addressed willing bearers
when, in the summer of 1850, he began to hint at the
necessity of a prolongation of his own power. The
Parliamentary recess was employed by the Presi-
dent in two journeys through the Departments ; the
first through those of the south-cast, where Socialism
was most active, and where his appearance served at
once to prove his own confidence and to invigorate the
friends o£ authority ; the second through Normandy,
where the prevailing feeling was strongly in favour of
firm government, and uttcrancos could safely be made
by the President which would have brought bim into
.some risk at Paris. In suggesting that France required
his own continued presence at the head of the State
Louis Napoleon was not necessarily suggesting a viola-
tion of the law. It was provided by the Statutes of
1848 that the Assembly by a vote of three-fourths
might. order a revision of the Constitution; and in
favour of this revision petitions were already being
urn lOVia NAPOLEON. 163
drawn np throngfcout the country. Were the clause
forbidding the re-election of the President removed
from the Constitution, Louis Napoleon might fairly
beUeve that an immense majority of the French people
would re-jnvest him with power. He would probably
have been content with a legal re-election had this been
rendered possible ; but the Assembly showed little sign
of a desire to smooth his way, and it therefore became
necessary for him to seek the means of realising his aims
in violation of the law. He had persuaded himself that
his mission, his destiny, was to rule France ; in other
words, he had made up his mind to run such risks and
to sanction such crimes as might be' necessary to win
him sovereign power. With the loftier impulses of
ambition, motives of a meaner kind stimulated him
to acts of energy. Never wealthy, tlie father of a
family though unmarried, he had exhausted his means,
and would have returned to private life a destitute man,
if not laden with debt. When his Own resolution
flawed, there were those about him too deeply in-
terested in his fortunes to allow him to draw back.
It was by means of the army that Louis Napoleon
intended in the last resort to make himself master of
France, and the army had therefore to be LoniiHMioi«o»
won over to his personal cause. The generals "■^""•™r.
who had gained distinction either in the Algeriau wars
or in the suppression of insurrection in France were
without exception Orleanists or Bepublicans. Not a
single officer of eminence was as yet included in the
Bonapartist band. The President himself had never seep
z 2 '''^^
IM MODERN EXmOPa. IKL
service except in a Swiss camp of eiercise ; beyond his
name he possessed nothing that could possibly touch
the ima^nation of a soldier. The heroic element not
being discoverable in his person or his career, it re-
mained to work by more material methods. Louis
Napoleon had learnt many things in England, and had
perhaps observed in the English elections of that period
liow much may be effected by the simple means of
money-bribes and strong drink. The saviour of society
was not ashamed to order the garrison of Paris double
rations of brandy and to distribute innumerable doles of
half a franc or less. Military banquets were given, in
which the sergeant and the corporal sat side by side
with the higher officers. Promotion was skilfully
offered or withheld. Aa the generals of the highest
position were hostile to Bonaparte, it was the easier to
tempt their subordinates with the pro.spect of their
places. In the acclamations which greeted the Presi-
dent at the reviews held at Paris in the autumn of 1850,
in the behaviour both of officers and men in certain
regiments, it was seen how successful had been the
emissaries of Bonapartism, The Committee which re-
presented the absent Chamber in vain called the Minis-
ter of War to account for these irregularities. It was
in vain tbat Changarnier, who, as commander both of
tbe National Guard of Paris and of the
chugunkr, first military division, seemed to hold the
Jib., WSL ■"
arbitrament between President and Assembly
in his hands, openly declared at the beginning of 1851
in favour of the Constitution. He was dismissed from
UU. FBOPOSSV SSTIBIOS Of THS CONSTITUTION. les
liis post; and althoagh a vote of eeDsnre which fol-
lowed ibis dismissal led to the resignation of the
Ministry, the Assembly was anable to reinstate Chan-
gamier in his command, and helplessly witnessed the
anthority which he had held pass into hostile or
untmstworthy hands.
There now remained only one possible means of
averting the attack upon the Constitution which was so
clearly threatened, and that was by subject-
ing the Constitution itself to revision in goo ^ ii»
order that Louis Napoleon might legally
seek re-election at the end of his Presidency. An over-
whelming current of public opinion pressed indeed in
the direction of such a cbange. However gross and
undisguised the initiative of the local functionaries in
preparing the petitions which showered upon the As-
sembly, the national character of the demand could
not be doubted. There was no other candidate whose
name carried with it any geniuoe popularity or prestige,
or around whom even the Parliamentary sections at
enmity with the President could rally. The Assembly
was divided not very unevenly between Legitimists,
Orleanists, and Republicans. Had indeed the two mon-
archical groups been able to act in accord, they might
have had some hope of re-establishing the throne ;
and an attempt had already been made to effect a
union, on the understanding that the childless Comte
de Cbambord should recognise the grandson of Louis
Philippe as bis heir, the House of Orleans renouncing
its claims during the lifetime of the chief of the
IM MODERK EUROPa. ml
elder line. These plans had heen fmstrated by the
refosal of the Comte de Chambord to sanctioii any
appeal to the popular vote, and the restoration of
the monarchy was therefore hopeless for the present.
It remained for the Assembly to decide whether
it would facilitate Louts Napoleon's re-election as
President by a revision of the Constitution or brave the
risk of his violent usurpation of power. The position
was a sad and even humiliating one for those who,
while they could not disguise their real feeling towards
the Prince, yet knew themselves unable to count on the
sapport of the nation if they should resist him. The
Legitimists, more sanguine in temper, kept in view an
ultimate restoration of the monarchy, and lent them-
selves gladly to any policy which might weaken the
constitutional safeguards of the Republic. The Eepub-
lican minority alone determined to resist any proposal
for revision, and to stake everything upon t)ie mainten-
ance of the Constitution in its existing
ctHutJhiUon form. "Weak as the Republicans were as
compared with the other groups in the
Assembly when united against them, they were yet
strong enough to prevent the Ministry from securing
that majority of three-fourths without which the re-
vision of the Constitution could not be undertaken.
Four hundred and fifty votes were given in favour of
revision, two hundred and seventy against it (July
19th). The proposal therefore fell to tlie ground, and
Louis Napoleon, who could already chaise the Assem-
bly with having by its majority destroyed universal
iteL PBSPARATIONB F0& TBS COUP IfSTAT. 167
suflrage, could now charge it with having hy its
minority forbidden the nation to choose its own head.
Nothing more was needed by him. He had only
to decide upon the time and the circumstances of the
couj) d'etat which was to rid him of his adversaries and
to make him master of France.
Louis Napoleon had few intimate confidants; the
chief among these were his half-brother Momy, one of
the illegitimate offspring of Queen Hortense, a man of
fashion and speculator in the stocks; Fialia p_„,tion,,„
or Persigny, a person of humble origin who *** '"' ^"'^'
had proved himself a devoted follower of the Prince
throngh good and evil ; and Fleury, an officer -at this
time on a mission in Algiers. These were not men
out of whom Louis Napoleon could form an ad-
ministration, but they were useful to him in dis-
covering and winning over soldiers and officials of
sufficient standing to give to the execution of the con-
spiracy something of the appearance of an act of
Government. A general was needed at the War Office
who wonid go all lengths in illegality. Such a man
had already been found in St. Amaud, commander of a
brigade in Algiers, a brilliant soldier who had redeemed
a disreputable past by years of hard service, and who
was known to be ready to treat his French fellow-
citizens exactly as he would treat the Arabs. As St.
Amaud's name was not -yet familiar in Paris, a ciun-
paign was arranged in the summer of 1851 for the
purpose of winning him distinction. At the cost of
some hundreds of lives St. Amaud was pushed into
U8 MODBBN XJTSOPB. ML
sufficient £ame ; and after receiving oongratolations
proportioned to his exploits from the President's
own hand, he was summoned to Paris, in order at
the right moment to be made Minister of War. A
troop of younger oflScers, many of whom gained a
lamentable celebrity as the generals of 1870, were
gradually brought orer from Algiers and placed round
the Minister in the capital. The command of the army
of Paris was given to General Magnan, who, though
he preferred not to share in the deliberations on the
coup d'itat, had promised his co-operation when the
moment should arrive. The support, or at least the
acquiescence, of the army seemed thus to be assured.
The National Guard, which, under Changamier, would
probably have rallied in defence of the Assembly, had
been placed under an officer pledged to keep it in
inaction. Per the management of the police Iionis
Napoleon had fixed upon M. Maupas, Pr^fet of the
Haute Garonne. This person, to whose shamelessness
we owe the most authentic information that exists on
the coup d'elat, had, while in an inferior station, made
it his business to ingratisite himself with the President
hy sending to him persoually police reports which ought
to have been sent to the Ministers. The objects and
the character of M. Maupas were soon enough under^
stood by Louis Napoleon. He promoted him to high
office , sheltered him from the censure of his superiors ;
and, when the coup d'etat wa.s drawing nigh, called him
to Paris, in the full and well-grounded confidence that,
whatever the most perfidious ingenuity could oontriva
tm. ST. ASNAUD. 16»
in tnming the gnardiana of tlie law against the law
itself, that M. Manpas. as Piefet of Police, might be
relied upon to accompliBh.
Preparations for tiie coup d'etat had been so far
advanced in September that a majority of the conspirators
had then urged Lonis Napoleon to strike the blow with-
out delay, while the members of the Assembly were still
dispersed over France in the vacation. St.
Amaud, however, refused his assent, de- &»d(arDB-
claring that the deputies, if left free, would
assemble at a distance from Paris, summon to them the
generals loyal to the Constitation, and commence a
civil war. He urged that, in order to avoid greater
subseqaent nsls, it would be necessary to seize all the
leading representatives and generals from whom re-
sistance might be expected, and to hold them under
durance until the crisis should be over. This simul-
taneous arrest of all the foremost public mea iu France
could only be effected at a time when tbe Assembly
was sitting. St. Amaud therefore demanded that the
coup d'etat should be postponed till the winter. Another
reason made for delay. Little as the populace of Paris
loved the reactionary Assembly, Louis Napoleon was
not alti^ether assured that it would quietly witness his
own usurpation of power. In waiting until the Oham-
ber should agun be in session, he saw the opportunity
of exhibiting his cause as that of the masses themselves,
and of justifyiDg his action as the sole means of en-
forcing popular rights against a legislatnxe obstinately
bent on denying ihem. Ijonis Napoleon's own If inistcrtf
1?» MODEBy EUBOPB. ML
bad overthrown universal snfin^. This might indeed
be matter for comment on the part of the censorioua,
hot it was not a circumstance to stand in the way of
the execution of a great design. Accordingly Louis
Napoleon determined to demand from the Assembly at
the opening of the winter session the repeal of the
electoral law of Hay Slst, and to make its refusal, on
which be could confidently reckon, the occasion of its
destiTiction.
The conspirators were up to this time conspirators
and nothing more. A Ministry still subsisted which
was not initiated in the President's designs nor alto-
gether at his command. On his requiring that the
repeal of the law of May Slst should be proposed to
the Assembly, the Cabinet resigned. The way to the
highest functions of State was thus finally opened for
the agents of the coup d'etat. St. Amaud was placed
at the War Office, Maupas at the Prefecture of Police.
The colle^ues assigned to them were too insignificant
to exercise any control over their actions. - At the re-
opening of the Assembly on the 4tb of November an
energetic message from the President was read. On
the one hand he denounced a vast and perilous com-
biuation of all the most dangerous elements of society
which threatened to overwhelm France in the following
year ; on the other hand he demanded, with
rf'iiSJ'of^ certain undefined safeguards, the re-establish-
ment of universal suffrage. The middle
classes were scared with the prospect of a Socialist revo-
lution; the Assembly was divided against itself, and the
C.oo;;lc ;
!
IBL XHS MBEMBLY AT PABI8. 171
democracy of Paris flattered by the homage p^d to the
popular vote. With veiy little delay a measure repeal-
ing the Lav of May Slst was introduced into the
A^embly. It was supported by the Eepablicans and
by many members of the other groups; bat the majority
of the Assembly, while anxious to devise some com-
promise, refused to condemn its own work in the
unqualified form on which the President insisted. The
Bill was thrown out by seven votes. Forth- .j^ A«mKr
with the rumoiir of an impending coop "'"**■
d'etai spread through Paris. The Qaestors, or members
chared with the safeguarding of the Assembly, moved
the resolutions necessary to enable them to secure
sufficient military aid. Even now prompt action
might perhaps have saved the Chamber. But the
Bepublican deputies, inceosed by their defeat on the
question of universal 8u£frage, pluoged headloog into
the snare set for them by the President, and combined
with his open or secret partisans to reject the proposi-
tiorrof the Questors. Changamier had blindly vouched
for the fidelity of the array ; one Republican deputy,
more imaginative than his colleagues, bade the Assembly
confide in their invisible sentinel, the people. Thus
the majority of the Chamber, with the clearest warning
of danger, insisted on giving the aggressor every pos-
sible advantage. If the imbecility of opponents is the
best augury of success in a bold enterprise, the Presi-
dent had indeed little reason to anticipate failure.
The execution of the coup d'etat vf as fixed for the
early morning of December 2nd. On the previous
173 UODSBS EVaOPB. aa.
evening Louis Kapoleon held a public reception at the
Elys^e, his qoiet self-possessed manner indicating
Tbtmpim, T^ofiung of the stru^le at hand. Before
the gaests dispersed the President with-
drew to his study. There the last council of the con-
spirators was held, and thej parted, each to the execa-
tiou of the work assigned to him. The central element
in the plan was the arrest of Cavaignac, of Changamier
and three other generals who were members of the
Assembly, of eleven civilian deputies including M.
Thiers, and of sixty-two other politicians of influence.
Maupas sammoned to the Prefecture of Police in the
dead of nigbt a sufficient number of his trusted agents^
received each of them on his arrival in a separate room,
and charged each with the arrest of one of the victims.
The arrests were accomplished before dawn, and the
leading soldiers and citizens of France met one another
in the prison of Mazas. The Palais Bourbon, the
meeting-place of the Assembly, was occupied by troops.
The national printing establishment was seized by
gendarmes, and the proclamations of Louis Napoleon,
distributed sentence by sentence to different composi-
tors, were set in type before the workmen knew upon
what they were engaged. When day broke the Paris-
ians found the soldiers in the streets, and the walls
placarded with manifestoes of Louis Napoleon. The
first of these was a decree which announced in the name
of the French people that the National Assembly and
the Council of State were dissolved, that universal suf-
frage was restored, and that the nation was convoked
un. TBS COUP D'STAT. 173
in its electoral colleges £rom the I4th to the 21st
o£ December. The second was a proclamation to the
people, in which IJouis Napoleon denounced at once the
monarchical conspirators within the Assembly and the
ajiarchists who sought to overthrow all government. TTin
duty called upon him to save the Republic by an appeal
to the nation. He proposed the establishment of a
decennial executive authority, with a Senate, a Council
of State, a Legislative Body, and other institutions
borrowed from the Consulate of 1799. If the nation
refused him a majority o^ its votes he would summon
a new Assembly and resign his powers ; if the nation
believed in the cause of which his name was the symbol,
in Prance regenerated by the Revolution and organised
by the Emperor, it would prove this by ratifying his
authority. A third proclamation was addressed to the
army. In 1830 and in 1848 the army had been treated
as the conquered, but its voice was now to be heard.
Common glories and sorrows united the soldiers of
France with Napoleon's heir, and the future would
unite them in common devotion to the repose and
greatness of their country.
The full meaning of these manifestoes was not at
first understood by the groups who read them. The
Assembly was so unpopular that the announcemeat of
its dissolution, with the restoration of uni-
versal suffrage, pleased rather than alarmed
tiie democratic quarters of Paris. It was not until
some hours had passed that the arrests became gener-
ally known, and that the first symptoms of resifitance
174 MOVERS amtOPE. un.
appeared. Cfroups of deputies assembled at the houses of
the Parliamentary leaders ; a body of fifty even succeeded
in entering the Palais Bourbon and in commencing a
debate : they were, however, soon dispersed by soldiers.
Lutcr in the day above two hundred members assembled
ut the M^rie of the Tenth Arrondissement. There
they passed resolutions declaring the President removed
from his office, and appointing a commander of the
troops at Fans. The first officers who were sent to
clear the Mairie flinched in the execution of their work,
and withdrew for further orders. The Magistrates of
the High Court, whose duty it was to order the im-
peachment of the President in case of the violation of
bis oath to the Constitution, assembled, and commenced
the necessary proceedings; but before they could sign a
warraut, soldiers forced their way into the hall and drove
the judges from the Bench. In due course General Forey
appeared with a strong body of troops at the Mairie,
where the two hundred deputies were assembled. Ee-
fusing to disperse, they were one and all arrested, and
conducted as prisoners between files of troops to the
Barracks of the Quai d'Orsay. The National Guard,
whose drums had been removed hy their commander in
view of any spontaneous movement to arms, remained
invisible, Louis Napoleon rode out amidst the accla-
mations of the soldiery; and when the day closed it
seemed as if Paris had resolved to accept the change of
Government and the overthrow of the ConstitutioD
without a struggle.
There were, however, a few resolute men at work in
18U. TEE COUP le&TAT. 175
the workmen's quarters ; and in the wealthier part of
the dtj the outrage upon the National Bepresentation
gradoallj roused a spirit of resistance. On the morning
of December 3rd the Deputy Baadin met
with his death in attempting to defend a
barricade which had been erected in the Fanbooi^ St.
Antoine. The artisans of eastern Paris showed,
however, little inclination to take up arms on
behalf of those who had crushed them in the Four
Days of June ; the agitation was strongest within the
Boulevards, and spread westwards towards the stateliest
district of Paris. The barricades erected on the south
of the Boulevards were so numerous, the crowds so for-
midable, that towards the close of the day the troops
were withdrawn, and it was determined that after a night
of quiet they should make a general attack and end
the struggle at one blow. At midday on
December 4th divisions of the army con-
veiged from all directions upon the insurgent quarter.
The barricades were captured or levelled by artillery,
and with a loss on the part of the troops of twenty-eight
killed and a hundred and eighty wounded resistanoe
was overcome. But the soldiers had been taught to
regard the inhabitants of Paris as their enemies, and
they bettered the instructions given them. Maddened
by drink or panic, they commenced indiscriminate
firing in the Boulevards after the conflict was over,
and slaughtered all who either in the street or at the
windows of the houses came within range of their
bullets. According to official admissions, the lives of
176 MODBSlf XUEOPa. m
sixteen dvilians paid for every soldier slain ; inde-
pendent estimates place ia,T higher the number of the
victims of this massacre. Two thousand arrests followed,
and every Frenchman who appeared dangerous to Louis
Kapoleon's myrmidons, from Thiers and Victor Hugo
down to the anarchist oratora of the wineshops, was
either transported, exiled, or lodged in prison. Thus
was the Eepuhiic preserved and society saved.
Prance in general received the news of the cfWjp
d'etat with indifference : where It excited popular move-
ments these movements were of such a character that
Louis Napoleon drew irom them the utmost profit. A
TheHftrf«it« certain fierce, blind Socialism had spread
^*"' "■ among the poorest of the rural classes in the
centre and south of France. In these departments there
were isolated risings, accompanied by acts of such moX'
derous outr^e and folly that a general terror seized the
surrounding districts. In the course of a few days the
predatory bands were dispersed, aud an unsparing
chastisement inflicted on all whe were concerned in
their misdeeds; but the reports sent to Paris were too
serviceable to Louis Napoleon to be left in obscurity;
and these brutish village-outbreaks, which collapsed at
the first appearance of a handful of soldiers, were re-
presented as the prelude to a vast Socialist revolution
from which the coup d'etat, and that alone, had saved
France. Terrified by the re-appearance of the Eed
Spectre, the French nation proceeded on the 20th of
December to pass its judgment on the accomplished
usurpation. The question submitted for the plebiadie
un NAPOLBOS HL 171
was, whether the people desired the maintenance of
LoaiB Napoleon's authority and committed to him the
necessary powers for establishing a Constitatlon on the
basis laid down in his proclamation of December 2nd.
Seven million votes answered this question in the affirm-
ative, less than one-tenth of that number in the nega-
tive. The result was made known on the last day of
the year 1851. On the first day of the new year Louis
Napoleon attended a service of thanksgiving at Notre
Dame, took possession of the Tuileries, and restored the
ei^le as the military emblem of France. He was now
in all but name an absolute sovereign. The Church,
the army, the ever-servile body of the civil administra-
tion, waited impatiently for the revival of the Imperial
title. Nor was the saviour of society the man to shrink
from further responsibilities. Before the year closed
the people was once more called upon to
express its will. Seven millions of votes Bmmor.DeB.
pronounced for hereditary power; and on
the anniversary of the coup d'etat Napoleon III. was
proclaimed !EmperoT of the French.
D,a,l,zc.bvG00gIe
OHAPTBE m.
Eng-UiHlaDdFmuMiiilStl— BluiuiimdsTNitliolu—The HDngMian BafogeM
— Dilputa between F^uoe and Biubu on the Holy Places — Nicliolaa and
the British Amhasiador — Loid Stratford de Beddifle — UenachikoFi
UiMion— Ruuiui Troops akt«r the Dacubiaa Principalitiee — Lord Aber-
deea'i GBbinet — Hovements of the Fleota — 'Dia Vioniui Note — The FJeeti
pua the Dardanellea — Turkuh SqtwulroD destmyed at Sinope — Dedaralion
ol War— Policy of Angtria — Policy of Pnuaia — The Westom Powera and
the European Concert— Siege of Siliatiia — The Friccipalitiee evaounted —
Further objecta of the Weatem Powera — iDvaeiuD of Ihe Crimea — BattU
of Qke Alma — The Flank Hatch— Balaclava— Inkenoann— Winter in the
Crimea — Death of NichoU* — Conference ot Vienna- AuBtria — FTogreae of
the Siege — Plant of Napoleon III. — Canrobort and Fflisaier — TTiimii i iiwriil
Aaaault— Battle of the Tchemaya— Capture of the MaUkoft- Fall of Sebaa-
topol — Call of Ears — Negotiationa for Peace — The Conferenoa of Paria —
lYeatj of Paiia — The Danubian Principalities — Continued discoid m Uta
Ottoman Empii«— Beriaion of the Treaty of Paria in 1871.
The year 1851 was memorable in England as that
of the Great Exhibition. Thirty-six years of peace,
marked by an enormous development of manufacturing
industry, by the introduction of railroads, and by the
victory of the principle of Free Trade, had culminated
in a spectacle so impressive and so novel that to many it
seemed the emblem fmd harbinger of a new epoch in
the history of mankind, in which war should
cease, and the rivalry of nations should at
length find its true scope in the advancement of the
arts ot peace. The apostles of Free Trade had idealised
the cause for which they contended. The unhappiness
and the crimes of nations had, as they held, been doe
1K9. ENGLAND AND FRANCE. 179
principally to the action of governments, wliicli plunged
harmless millions into war for dynastic euda, and
paralysed human enei^y by their own blind and sense-
less interference with the natural course of exchange.
Compassion for the poor and the sufiering, a just resent-
ment against laws which in the interest of one dominant
class condemned the mass of the nation to a life of
want, gave moral ferroor and elevation to the teaching
of Cobden and those who shared his spirit. Like others
who have been constrained by a noble enthusiasm, they
had their visions ; ^id in their sense of the greatness of
that Dew force which was ready to operate upon human
life, they both forgot the incompleteness of their own
doctrine, and under-estimated the influences which
worked, and long must work, upon mankind in an
opposite direction. In perfect sincerity the leader of
English economical reform at the middle of this century
looked forward to a reign of peace and of unfettered
intercourse among the members of the European family.
What the man of genius and conviction had pro-
claimed the diarlatan repeated in his turn. Louis '
Napoleon appreciated the charm which schemes of com-
mercial development exercised upon the trading classes
in France. He was ready to salute the Imperial eagles
as objects of worship, and to invoke the memories of
Napoleon's glory when addressing soldiers ; when it
concerned bim to satisfy the commercial world, he was
the very embodiment of peace and of peaceful industry.
" Certain persons," he said, in an address at Bordeaux,
shortly before assuming the title of Emperor, "say
M 2 ■^"'81^'
180 UODS&S EUROPa. tea.
that the Empire is weu*. I saj that the Empire
is peace ; for Prance desires peace, aod when France
is satisfied the world is tranquil. We have waste
territories to cultivate, roads to open, harbours to dig, a
system of railroads to complete ; we have to bring all
our great western ports into eonnection with the Ameri-
can continent by a rapidity of communication which we
still want. We have rains to restore, false gods to
overthrow, truths to make triumphant. This is the
sense that I attach to the Empire ; these are the con-
quests which I contemplate." Never had the ideal of
industrious peace been more impressively set before
mankind than in the years which succeeded the con-
vulsion of 1848. Yet the epoch on which Europe was
then about to enter proved to be pre-eminently an epoch
of war. In the next quarter of a century there was not
one of the Great Powers which was not engaged in an
armed struggle with its rivals. Nor were the wars of
this period in any sense the result of accident, or dis-
connected with the stream of political tendencies which
makes the history of the age. With one exception
they left in their train great changes for which tiie
time was ripe, changes which for more than a genersr
tion had been the recognised objects of national desire,
but which persuasion and revolution bad equally failed
to bring into effect. The Crimean War alone was
barren in positive results of a lasting natare, and may
seem only to have postponed, at enormous cost of life,
the fall of a doomed and outworn Power. Bat the
time has i^ot yet arrlT^d when the real bearing of the
overthrow of Russia in 1854 on the destiny of the
Christian races of Turkey can.be confidently expressed.
The Tictory of the Sultan's protectors delayed the
emancipation of these races for twenty years ; the
victory, or the unchecked aggreBBion, of Bussia in 1854
might possibly have closed to them for ever the ways to
national independence.
The plans formed by the Empress Catherine in the
last century for the restoration of the Qreek Empire
under a prince of the Bnssian House had long been
abandoned at St. Petersbunr. The later
° Bnaiu patkr
aim of Russian policy found its clearest ex- ™i«mdwiM.
pression in the Treaty of Unkiar Skelessi, extorted from
Sultan Mahmud in 1833 in the course of the iirst war
gainst Mehemet Ali. This Treaty, if it had not been
set aside by the Western Powers, would have made the
Ottoman Empire a vassal State under the 'Czar's pro-
tection. In the concert of Europe which was called
into beiug by the second war of Mehemet Ali against
the Sultan in 1840, Nicholas had considered it his
interest to act with England and the German Powers in
defence of the Porte gainst its Egyptian rival and
his French ally. A policy of moderation had been
imposed upon Bussia by the increased watchfulness
and activity now displayed hy the other European States
in all that related to the Ottoman Empire. Isolated
aggression had become impracticable ; it was necessary
for Bussia to seek the countenance or support of some
ally before venturing on the next step in the extension
of its power southwards. In 1844 Nicholas visited
18S MODERN EUROPB. mtrU.
England. The object of bis journey was to Boand the
^ ^ . ^ Court and the Qovemment, and to lay the
*°*'»^'"**- foundation for concerted action between
Bussia and England, to the exclusion of France,
when circumstances should bring about the dis-
solution of the Ottoman Empire, an event which the
Czar believed to be not far off. Feel was then Prime
Minister; Lord Aberdeen was Foreign Secretary. Aber-
deen had begun his political career in a diplomatic
mission to the Allied Armies in I8I4. His feelings
towards Bussia were those of a loyal friend towards an
old ally ; and the remembrance of the epoch of 1S14,
when the young Nicholas had made acquaintance with
liord Aberdeen in France, appears to have given to the
Czar a peculiar sense of confidence in the goodwill of
the English Minister towards himself. Nicholas spoke
freely with Aberdeen, as well as with Peel and Wel-
lington, on the impending fall of the Ottoman Empire.
"We have," he said, "a sick, a dying man on our
hands. We must keep him alive so long as it is pos-
sible to do so, but we must frankly take into view all
contingencies. I wish for no inch of Turkish soil
myself, bat neither will I permit any other Power to
seize an inch of it. France, which has designs upon
Africa, upon the Mediterranean, and upon the East, is
the only Power to be feared. An understanding between
England and Bussia will preserve the peace of Europe."
If the Czar pursued bis speculations further into detail,
o which there is no evidence, he elicited no response,
e was heard with caution, and his visit appears to
have piodnced nothing more than the fonnal ezpresGion
of a desire on the part of the British Government that
the existing treaty-rights of Bnssia should he respected
hj the Porte, together with an unmeaning promise that,
if unexpected events should occor in Turkey, Sussia and
Eogland should enter into counsel as to the hest course
of action to be pursued in common.*
Nicholas, whether from policy or from a sense of
kingly honour ' which at most iiiaes powerfully in-
fluenced him, did not avail himself of the prostration
of the Continental Powers in 1848 to attack Turkey.
He detested revolution, as a crime against the divinely
ordered subjection of nations to their rulers,
and would probably have felt himself de-
graded had he, in the spirit of his predecessor Catherine,
turned the calamities of his brother-monarchs to his
own separate advant^e. It accorded better with
hb proud nature, possibly also with the schemes of a
far-reaching policy, for Russia to enter the field as the
protector of the Hapsburgs against the rebel Hungarians
than for its armies to snatch from the Porte what the
lapse of time and the goodwill of European allies would
probably give to Russia at no distant date without a
stru^le. Disturbances at Bucharest and at Jassy
led indeed to a Russian intervention in the Danu-
bian Principalities in the interests of a despotic
* Stockmar, 396. . Eastoni Fapen (i.e., Farliunentur Pspen, 1854,
YoL 71), part 6. Uftlmeaborj, Memoln of an ex-Miidstw, L 402 ; the
taut probablf inaccurate. Diplomatic Stndj of the Grimeaji War, i. 11.
This work is a Knsaiaii official publication, and, thongli loose and nntmst-
ifoMij, is taloable as abowinfi; the Bnawan official new.
IH iiODBRN BUBOPB. wml
system of government ; but Russia possessed by treaty
protecfcoraJ rights over these Provinces. The mili-
tary occupation which followed the revolt gainst the
Hospodars was the subject of a convention between
Turkey and Russia; it was effected by the armies of
the two Powers jointly ; and at the expiration of two
years the Russian forces were peacefully withdrawn.
More serious were the difficulties which arose from the
flight of Kossuth and other Hungarian leaders into
Turkey after the subjugation of Hungary Ti«H«Dg«i«
by the allied Austrian and Russian armies. °*™' ***■
The Courts of Vienna and St. Petersburg united in
demanding from the Porte the surrender of these
refugees ; the Sultan refused to deliver them up, and
be was energetically supported by Great Britain,
Kossuth's childreu on their arrival at Constantinople
being received and cared for at the British Embassy.
The tyrannous demand of the two Emperors, the
courageous resistance of the Sultan, excited the utmost
interest in Western Europe. By a strange turn of
fortune, the Power which at the end of the last century
had demanded from the Court of Vienna the Greek
leader Rhegas, and had put him to death as soon iis he
was handed over by the Austrian police, was now gain-
ing the admiration of all free nations as the last barrier
that sheltered the champions of European liberty from
the vengeance of despotic might The Czar and the
Emperor of Austria bad not reckoned with the forces of
public indignation aroused against them in the West
by their attempt to wrest their enemies from the
Sultan's hand. They withdrew their ambassadors from
Constantinople and threatened to resort to force. But
the appearance of the British and French fleets at the
Dardanelles gave a new aspect to the dispute. The Em-
perors learnt that if they made war upon Turkey for the
question at issue they would have to tight also against
the Western Powers. The demand for the surrender
of the refugees was withdrawn ; and in undertaking to
keep the principal of them under surveillance for a
reasonable period, the Sultan gave to the two Imperial
Courts such satisfaction as they could, without loss of
dignity, accept.*
The coup d'etat of Louis Napoleon at the end of the
year 1851 was witnessed by the Czar with sympathy
and admiration as a service to the cause of order j but
the assumption of the Imperial title by the Di,poiebeti™«
Prince displea-sed him exceedingly. While """"in™^'
not refusing to recognise Napoleon III., "''**^^-
he declined to address him by the term {vwn frere)
usually employed by monarchs in writing to one
another. In addition to the question relating to the
Hungarian refugees, a dispute concerning the Holy
Places in Palestine threatened to cause strife between
France and Kussia. The same wave of religious and
theological interest which in England produced the
Tractarian movement brought into the arena of politi-
cal life in France an enthusiasm for the Church long
strange to the Legislature and the governing circles of
Paris. In the Assembly of 1849 Montalembert, the
• AaUoj's Falmenton, u. 142. lAne Foole, Stntfoid de EedcliCe. U. lU.
ISA MODERN EVROFE. u»«
spokesman of this militant Catholicism, was one of the
foremost figures. Louis Napoleon, as President, sought
the favour of those whom Montalembert led ; and the
same Government which restored the Pope to Rome
demanded from the Porte a stricter enforcement of the
rights of the Latin Church in the East. The earliest
Christian legends had heen localised in various spots
around Jerusalem. These had been in the ages of faith
the goal of countless pilgrimages, and in more recent
centuries they had formed the object of treaties between
the Porte and France. Greek monks, however, disputed
with liatin monks for the guardianship of the Holy
Places; and as the power of Russia grew, the privileges
of the Greek monks had increased. The daims of tlio
rivan brotherhoods, which related to doors, keys, stars
and lamps, might probably have heen settled to the
satisfaction of all parties within a few hours by an ex-
perienced stage-manager; in the hands of diplomatists
bent on obtaining triumphs over one another they as-
sumed dimensions that overshadowed the peace of Europe.
The French and the Russian Ministers at Constantinople
alternately tormented the Sultan in the character of
aggrieved sacristans, until, at the beginning of 1852,
the Porte compromised itself with both parties by ad-
judging to each rights which it professed also to secure
to the other. A year more, spent in prevarications, in
excuses, and in menaces, ended with the triumph of tlie
French, with the evasion of the promises made by the
Sultan to Russia, and with the discomfiture of the
Greek Church in the person of the monks who
officiated at the Holy Sepnlolire and the Shrine of the
NatiTity*
Nicholas treated the condnct of the Porte as an
oatrage upon himself. A conflict which had broken
oat between the Saltan and the Montenegrins, and
which now threatened to take a deadly form, confirmed
the Czar in his belief that the time for resolate action
had arrived. At the beginning of the year
1853 he addressed himself to Sir Hamil- f^'^^"^^
ton Seymour, British ambassador at St.
Petersbni^, in terms mach stronger and clearer than
those which he had nsed towards Lord Aberdeen nine
years before. " The Sick Man," he said, " was in extre-
mities ; the time had come for a clear understanding
between England and Russia. The occupation of Con-
stantinople by Bassian troops might be necessary, but
the Czar woold not hold it permanently. He would
not permit any other Power to establish itself at the
Bosphoms, neither woold he permit the Ottoman Em-
pire to be broken up into Republics to afford a refuge
to the Mazzinis and the Kossnths of Europe. The
Danubian Principalities were already independent States
tmder Basaian protection. The other possessions of the
Saltan north of the Balkans might be placed on the
Bame footing. England might annex Egypt and Crete."
After making this communication to the British am-
bassador, and receiving the reply that England declined
to enter into any schemes based on the fall of the
Turkish Empire and disclaimed all desire for the
* Eutem Fkpen, L 65. Diplonutlo Sta^, L 12L /^^^nli'
18d UODB^f SVSOPa. ttsi
annexation of any part of the Sultan's dominions,
Kicholas despatched Prince Meoschikoff to Constantin-
ople, to demand from the Porte not only an immediate
settlement of the questions relating to the Holy Places,
but a Treaty guaranteeing to the Greek Church the
undisturbed enjoyment of all its ancient rights and the
benefit of all privileges that might be accorded by the
Porte to any other Christian communities.*
The Treaty which Menschikoff was instructed to
demand would have placed the Sultan and the Czar in
the position of contracting parties with regard to the
Thacuinuot cntirc body of rights and privileges enjoyed
^™**" by the Sultan's subjects of the Greek con-
fession, and would so have made the violation of these
rights in the case of any individual Christian a matter
entitling Bussia to interfere, or to claim satisfaction as
for the breach of a Treaty engagement. By the Treaty
of Kalnardjle (1774) the Sultan had indeed hound him-
self " to protect the Christian religion and its Churches ; "
but this phrase was too indistinct to create specific matter
of Treaty-obligation ; and if it tad given to Russia any
general right of interference on behalf of members of
the Greek Church, it would have given it the same
right in behalf of all the Roman Catholics and all the
Protestants in the Sultan's dominions, a right which
the Czars had never professed to enjoy. . Moreover the
Treaty of Kainardjie itself forbade by implication any
such construction, for it mentioned by name one eccle-
siastical building for whose priests the Porte did
• EMtem Pupers, t^2,1A, ,^ ,
18K MENSOniKOFF AT CONSTANTINOPLE. 189
concede to Russia the right of addressing representations
to the Saltan. Over the Danubian Principalities Russia
possessed by the Treaty of Adrianople undoubted pro-
tectoral rights ; but these Provinces stood on a footing
quite different from that of the remainder of the
Empire. That the Qreek Church possessed by custom
and by enactment privileges which it was the duty of
the Saltan to respect, no one contested : the novelty of
Menschikoffe claim was that the observation of these
rights should be made matter of Treaty with Russia.
The importance of the demand was proved by the fact
that Menschikoff strictly forbade the Turkish Ministers
to reveal it to the other Powers, and that Nicholas
caused the English Government to be informed that
the mission of his envoy had no other object than the
final adjustment of the difficulties respecting the Holy
Places.*
When Menschikoff reached Constantinople the
British Embassy was in the hands of a subordinate
officer. The Ambassador, Sir Stratford Canning, had
recently returned to England. Stratford Cunning, a
cousin of the Premier, had been employed in the East
at intervals since 1810. There had been a period in
his career when he had desired to see the L«datr«tfcnd
Turk expelled from Europe as an incurable '>«R«i'-i'ff«.
barbarian; but the reforms of SulUm Mahmud had at
a later time excited his warm interest and sympathy,
unJ as Ambassador at Constantinople from 1S42 to
1852 he had laboured strenuously for the regeneration
■ Eutcm F»pen, i. 102. Admitted la Biplomatio Stadj, i. 103.
.oogic
IM MODERN BVBOPR. im
of the Turkish Empire, and for the improvement of the
condition of the Christian races onder the Sultan's
rule. His dauntless, sustained energy, his noble pre-
sence, the sincerity of his friendship towards the Porte,
gave him an influence at Constantinople seldom, if
ever, exercised by a foreign statesman. There were
moments -when he seemed to be achieving results of
some value ; but the task which be had attempted was
one that surpassed human power ; and after ten years
so spent as to win for him the fame of the greatest
ambassador by whom England has been represented in
modern times, he declared that the prospects of Turkish
reform were hopeless, and left Constantinople, not in-
tending to return.* Before his successor had been
appointed, the mission of Prince Menschikoff, the
violence of his behaviour at Constantinople, and a
rumour that he sought far more than his ostensible
object, alarmed the British Government. Canning was
asked to resume his post. Returning to Constantinople
as Lord Stratford de Eedcliffe, he communicated on his
joomey with the Courts of Paris and Vienna, and
carried with him authority to order the Admiral of
* He writea thns, April S, 1851 : — " The grent game of improTement
ifl Altogutlior up for the present It is imposKible fur me to conceal that
ilie nuun object of m; ntsj here is almoet hopulcaa." Kven P&lmerBtoa,
in the rare moineiita when he allowed bis jnd^^ment to nuut^r hia prepoa-
aessionB on this eiibjoct, eipressed the same view. Uu wrote on Norem-
bor 24, 1850, wtirniiig Reschid Fash^ "the Turkish Kii>pire is doomed to
fall by the timiditf and irreaolutioa of its Sovereign And of its Ministors ;
and it ia oviduut we shall ere loitg hare to cuiuidor wliat other
ammgements maj be aet op in its place." StTatfonl left Constant in aple
on leave in June, 18.'i'2, but resigned hie Embassj altogether iu January,
-ir.?.. (Lane Poole. Stratfonl de ReddiSe, ii. 212, 215.)
USt ST&ATFORD rS SSDOLIPFS l9l
the fleet at Malta to hold hia ships ia readiness to sail
for the East. He arrived at the Boaphorus on
April 5tb, learnt at once the real situation of affairs,
and entered into negotiation with MenschikofE. The
liussian, a mere child in diplomacy in comparison with
his rival, suffered himself to be persuaded to separate
the question of the Holy Places from that of the gua-
rantee of the riglits of the Greek Church. In the first
matter Russia bad a good cause ; in the second it was
advancing a new claim. The two being dissociated,
Stratford had no difficulty in negotiating a com-
promise on the Holy Places satisfactory to the
Czar's representative ; and the demand for the Pro-
tectorate over the Greek Christiana now stood out un-
ob-scured by those grievances of detail with which it
had been at first interwoven. Stratford encouraged the
Turkish Government to reject the Russian proposal.
Knowing, nevertheless, that Menschikoff would in the
la-st resort endeavour to intimidate the Sultan personally,
he withheld from the Ministers, in view of this last
peril, the strongest of all his arguments ; and seeking
a private audience with the Sultan on the 9th of
May, he made known to him with great solemnity
the authority which he had received to order the fleet
at Malta to be in rea^linesa to sail. The Sultan
placed the natural interpretation on this
statement, and ordered the final rejection of t^-'^^ (■".■.u.n-
MenschikolTs demand, thoiii,'b the Russian
had consented to a modification of its form, and
would now have accepted a note declaratory of the-
1» MODBSN BtmOPS. IM
intentions of the Sultan towBids the Glreek Church
instead of a regular Treaty. On the 21st of May
Menschikoff quitted Constaatinople ; and the Czar,
declaring that some goaraatee must be held by Bussia
for the mainteDauce of the rights of the Greek Chris-
tians, announced tliat he should order his army to
occupy the Danubian Provinces. After an
■itarUwFHut- internal of some weeks the Bussian troops
crossed the Pruth, and spread themselves
over Moldavia and AVallachia. (June 22nd.) *
Iq the ordinary course of affairs the invasion of
the territory of one Empire by the troops of another
is, and can be nothing else than, an act of war, necessi-
tating hostilities as a measure of defence on the part
of the Power invaded. Bat the Czar protested that
in taking the Danubian Principalities in pledge he had
no intention of violating the peace ; and as yet the com-
mon sense of the Turks, as well as the counsels that they
received from without, hade them hesitate before issuing
a declaration of war. Since December, 1852, Lord
Aberdeen had been Prime Minister of Bug-
land, at the head of a Cabinet formed by a
coalition between followers of Sir Robert Peel and
the Whig leaders Palmerston and BusselLf There was
no man in Kngland more pacific in disposition, or more
anxious to remain on terms of honourable fiiendship
with Bussia, than Lord Aberdeen. The Czar had
• Eastern Fspara, I 253, 339. Lane Poole, Stnttord, iL 248.
t Palmeraton bad accepted the office of Home SeoreUzr, bnt natoraUy
exerdsed fp-eat inSnenoe in fwugn affairs. Tlie 7oreigB Qeentairf wM
Lord Olarendon.
MR. BTRATFOSJ> DB BEDOLIFFB. 19S
jostly reckoned on the Premier's owq forbearance ; but
he had ^ed to recognise the strength of those forces
which, both within and without 'the Cabinet, set in
the direction of armed resistance to Eussia. Palmer-
ston was keen for action. Lord Stratford appears
to have taken it for granted &om the first that, if a
war should arise between the Sultan and the Czar
in consequence of the rejection of MenschikofTs
demand, Great Britain would fight in defence of the
Ottoman Empire. ■ He had not stated this in express
terms, but the communication which he made to the
Sultan regarding his own instructions could only hare
been intended to convey this impression. If the fleet
was not to defend the Sultan, it was a mere piece of
deceit to inform him that the Ambassador had powers
to place it in readiness to sail ; and such deceit was as
alien to the character of Lord Stratford as the assump-
tion of a virtual engagement towards the Sultan was in
keeping with his imperious will and his passionate
conviction of the duty of England. From the date of
Lord Stratford's visit to the Palace, althongh no Treaty
or agreement was in existence, England stood bound in
honour, so long as the Turks should pursue the policy
laid down by her envoy, to fulfil the expectations which
this envoy had held out.
Had Lord Stratford been at the head of the
Government, the policy and intentions of Great Britain
wonld no doubt have been announced with such
distinctness that i^e Czar could have fostered no
misapprehension as to the results of his own acts.
m UODBBlf SUSOPE. un
Palmerston, as Premier, would probably bave adopted
the same clear course, and war would either have been
avoided by this nation or have been made with a dis-
tinct purpose and on a deBnite issue. But the Cabinet of
Lord Aberdeen was at Tarianco with itself. Aberdeen
was ready to go to all lengths in negotiation, bat he
was not sufficiently master of bis colle^ues and of the
representatives of England abroad to prevent acts and
declarations which in themselves brought war near ;
above all, he failed to require from Turkey that abstention
from hostilities on which, so long as negotiations lasted,
England and the other Powers which proposed to make
the cause of the Porte their own ought unquestion-
ably to bave insisted. On the announcement by the
Czar that his army was about to enter the Prin-
cipalities, the British Qovemraent de-
BriUah and '^ '
S2^''taB^-k» spatched the fleet to Besika Bay near the
entrance to the Dardanelles, and authorised
Stratford to call it to the Bosphorus, in case Constan-
tinople should he attacked-* The French fleet, which
had come into Greek waters on MenschikofTs appear-
ance at Constantinople, took up the same position.
Meanwhile European diplomacy was busily engaged
in framing schemes of compromise between the Porte
and Kussia. The representatives of the four Powers
met at Vienna, and agreed upon a note which, as they
considered, would satisfy any legitimate claims of
Russia on behalf of the Greek Church, and at the same
time impose upon the Sultan no further obligations
<■ Bastorn Fapeni, i. 210, ii. 116. AaUot'i Falmentoi, 0, Z3,
MM. TSB raUlfA NOTE. IW
towards finssia than those which already existed.*
This note, howerer, was ill diawn, and would have
opened the door to new claims on the part of Bussia
to a general Protectorate not sanctioned hy its authors.
The draft was sent to St. Petersburg, and .^y,^^
was accepted by the Czar. At Constan- ''"*^'"''*-
tinople its ambiguities were at once recc^nised; and
tbongh Lord Stratford in his official capacity ni^ed
its acceptance under a European guarantee against
misconstruction, the Divan, now under the pressure of
strong patriotic forces, refused to accept the note un-
less certain changes were made in its expressions.
France, England, and Austria united in recommend-
ing to the Court of St. Petersburg the adoption of
these amendments. The Czar, however, declined to
admit them, and a Bussian document, which obtained a
publicity for which it was not intended, proved that
the construction of the note which the amendments
were expressly designed to exclude was precisely that
which Kussia meant to place upon it. The British
Ministry now refused to recommend the note any
longer to the Porte.f Austria, while it approved of
the amendments, did not consider that their rejection
by the Czar justified England in abandoning the note
as the common award of the European Powers; and
thus the concert of Europe was interrupted, England and
France combining in a policy which Austria and Prussia
were not willing to follow. In proportion as the
chances of joint Europeim action diminished, the ardour
• Euten Papwi, U. 2S. f Eastern F»P«n, 0. 8«, U. 108.
^a ... Coogle
196 XODEBN EUBOPB. uto.
of the Turks themselves, and of those who were to be
theirallies, rose higher. Tumults, oi^nised
by the heads of the war-party, broke oat at
ConBtantinopIe ; and although Stratford scorned the
alarms of his French colleagues, who reported that a
massacre of the Europeans in the capital was imminent,
he thought it necessary to call up two vessels of war in
order to provide for the security of the English residents
and of the Sultan himself. In England Palmerston
and the men of action in the Cabinet dragged Lord
Aberdeen with them. The French Government pressed
for vigorous measures, and in conformity with its desire
inRtructions were sent from London to Lord Stratford
to call the fleet to the Bosphorus, and to employ it in
^^ defending the territory of the Sultan
5^d2 against aggression. On the 22nd of October
the British and French fleets passed the
Dardanelles.
The Turk, sure of the protection of the Western
Powers, had for some weeks resolved upon war ; and yet
the possibilities of a diplomatic settlement were not yet
exhausted. Stratford himself had forwarded to Vienna
the draft of an independent note which the Sultan was
prepared to accept. This had not yet been
oi^^r p«h. seen at St. Petersbui^. Other projects
of conciliatioD filled the desks of aU the
leading politicians of Europe. Yet, though the belief
generally existed that some scheme conid be framed
by which the Sultan, without sacrifice of his dignity
and interest, might induce the Czar to evacuate the
Prin(»palitie8, no serions attempt was made to prevent
the Tiaks from coming into collision with tlielr enemies
both by land and sea. The commander oE the Bnssian
troops in the Principalities having, on the 10th of
October, rejected an ultimatam requiring him to with-
draw within fifteen days, this answer was taken as the
signal for the commencement of hostilities. The
Czar met the declaration of war with a statement
that he would abstain from taking the offensive, and
would continue merely to hold the Principalities as
a material guarantee. Omar Pasha, the Ottoman
commander in Bulgaria, was not permitted to ohserve
the same passive attitude. Crossing the Danube, he
attacked and defeated the Russians at Oltenitza. Thus
assailed, the Czar considered that his eDgagement not to
act on the offensive was at an end, and the
Kussian fleet, issuing from Sebastopol, ™na«tmT^»i
attacked and destroyed a Turkish squadron
in the harbour of Sinope on the southern coast of the
Black Sea (November 30). The action was a piece of
gross folly on the part of the Bussian authorities if tliey
still cherished the hopes of pacification which the Czar
professed ; but others also were at fault. Lord Stratford
and the British Admiral, it Ihey could not prevent the
Turkish ships from remaining in the Euxine, where they
were useless against the superior force of Bussia, might at
least in exercise of the powers given to them have sent
a sufficient escort to prevent an encounter. But the
same ill-fortune and incompleteness that had marked
all the diplomacy of the previous months attended the
198 UODSBN BUROPg. tma.
counsels of the Admirals at the Bosphoras; and the
disaster of Sinope rendered war between the Western
Powers and Russia almost inevitable.*
The Turks themselves had certainly not understood
the declaration of the Emperor Nicholas as assuring
Eir«t of ti« their squadron at Sinope aguinst attack; and
■ction ai Binopa. ^^ ^^^ ^^ ^-^^ Ottomau Admir^ from being
the victim of a surprise that he had warned his Govern-
ment some days before of the probability of his own
destruction. But to the English people, indignant
with Russia since its destruction of Hungarian liberty
and its tyrannous demand for the surrender of the Hun-
garian refugees, all that now passed heaped up the intoler-
able sum of autocratic violence aiid deceit. The cannon-
ade which was continued against the Turkish crews at
Sinope long after they had become defenceless gave to the
battle the aspect of a massacre ; the supposed promise
of the Czar to act only on the defensive caused it to he
denounced as an act of flagrant treachery ; the circum-
stance that the Turkish fleet was lying within one of
the Sultan's harbours, touching as it were the terri-
tory which the navy of England had undertaken to pro-
tect, imparted to the attack the character of a direct
challenge and defiance to England. The cry rose
loud for war. Napoleon, eager for the alliance with
England, eager in conjunction with England to play
a great part before Europe, even at the cost of a war
from which France had nothing to gain, proposed that the
combined fleets should pass the Bosphoras ^id recjuire
• Eaateni Fapera, u. 203; 227, 299l
• oogk
leu. FBASOE AND BNQLAND DXOXJLBB WAR. 199
everj Bussian vessel sulmg on the Black Sea to re-
enter port. His proposal was adopted by
the British GoTemment. Nicholas learnt
port, Dacnsber,
that the Bussian flag was swept from the
Euxine. It was in vain that a note upon which the
representatives of the Powers at Vienna had once more
agreed was accepted by the Porte and forwarded to St.
Petersburg (December 31). The pride of the Cziu* was
wounded beyond endurance, and at the beginning of
February he recalled bis ambassadors from London and
Paris. A letter written to him by Napoleon III., de-
manding in the name of himself and the Queen of Eng-
land the evacuation of the Principalities, was answered
by a reference to the campaign of Moscow. Austria now
informed the Western Powers that if they would fix a
delay for the evacuation of the Principalities, the ex-
piration of which should be the signal for hostilities,
it would support the summons ; and without waiting
to leam whether Austria would also unite with them
in hostilities in the event of the summons being re-
jected, the Bntish and French Governments despatched
their nitimatam to St. Petersbui^. Austria and
Prussia sought, hnt in vain, to reconcile the Court of
St. Petersburg to the only measure by -^^^
which peace could now be preserved. The S^m^S^.
ultimatum remained without an answer,
and on the 37tb of March England and France declared
war.
The Czar had at one time believed that in his
Eastern sdiemes he was sore, of the support of Austria ;
200 MODERN EUBOFB. MM
and he had strong reasons for supposing himself en-
titled to its aid. But his mode of thought was simpler
than that of the Court of Vienna. Schwarzenbei^,
when it was remarked that the intervention of Russia
pjji^^ ^ in Hungary would bind the House of
■*°**' Hapshurg too closely to its protector, had
made the memorable answer, " We will astonish the
world by our ingratitude." It is possible that an
instance of Austrian gratitude would have astonished
the world most of all ; but Schwarzenherg's successors
were not the men to sacrifice a sound principle to romance.
Two courses of Eastern policy have, under various
modifications, had their advocates in rivid schools of
statesmen at Vienna. The one Is that of expansion
southward in concert with Russia ; the other is that
of resistance to the extension of Russian power, and
tlie consequent maintenance of the integrity of the
Ottoman Empire. During Metternich's long rule, in-
spired as this was by a faith in the Treaties and the
institutions of 181 5, and by the dread of every living, dis-
turbing force, the second of these systems had been con-
sistently followed. In lS5i the determiniag motive
of the Court of Vienna was not a decided political con-
viction, but the certainty that if it united with Russia
it would be brought into war with the Western Powers.
Had Russia and Turkey been likely to remain alone in
the arena, an arrangement for territorial compensation
would possibly, as on some other occasions, have won
for the Czar aii Austrian alliance. Combination against
Turkey was, however, qt the present time, too perilous
an enterprise for tlie Angtritin monarchy: and, as
nothing was to be gained through the war, it remained
for the Viennese diplomatists to see that nothing was
lost and as little as possible wasted. The presence
of- Eossian troops in the Principalities, where they
ooDtrolled the Danabe in its course between the
Hangarian frontier and the Black Sea, was, in
default of some definite nnderstanding, a danger to
Austria; and Count Buol, the Minister at Vienna,
had therefore every reason to thank the Western
Powers for insisting on the evacuation of this district.
When France and England were burning to take
up arms, it would have been a piece of superfluous
brutality towards the Czar for Austria to attach to its
own demand for the evacuation of the Principalities the
threat of war. But this evacuation Austria was de-
termined to enforce. It refused, as did Prussia, to ^ve to
the Czar the assurance of its neutrality ; and, inasmuch
as the free navigation of the Danube as far as the Black
Sea had now become recognised as one of the commercial
interests of Germany at laige, Prussia and the German
Federation undertook to protect the territory of Aus-
tria, if, in taking the measures Decessary to free the
Principalities, it should itself be attacked by Hussia.*
The King of Prussia, clouded as his mind was
• Trestr of April 20, 185^ and Additional Artiale, Easteni Papers,
ix. 61. Thn Treaty between Austria and Pnuria was one of general
dafenarre aUianco, covering also the ease of Austria incurring attack
tliTonglt aa, advance into the Friudpalitiea. In tiie ereot of Biunia
aaneziiig' the Principalities or ffn'ling its troopi Iwjoiid the BoUunu tlie
•Qianee was to be offenoire.
202 MODBBN SUBOPE. uh.
by political and religious phantaams, had never-
theless at times a lai^er range of view
than his neighbours ; and his opinion
as to the true solution of Che difficulties between
Nicholas and the Forte, at the time of MeDschikoffs
mission, deserved more attention than it received.
Frederick William proposed tbat the rights of the
Christiau subjects of the Sultan should be placed by
Treaty under the guarantee of all the Great Powers.
This project was opposed by Lord Stratford and the
Turkish Ministers as an encroachment on the Saltan's
sovereignty, and its rejection led the King to write
with some asperity to his ambassador in London that
he should seek the welfare of Prussia in absolute
neutrality.* At a later period the King demanded from
England, as the condition of any assistance from him-
self, a guarantee for the maintenance of the frontiers of
Germany and Prussia. He regarded Napoleon III. as
the representative of a revolutionary system, and be-
lieved that under him French armies would soon en-
deavour to overthrow the order of Europe established
in 1816. That England should enter into a dose
* BriefwediMl F, Wilhelma mit Bnnasi, p. 310. Hutin's Prince
Consort, iiL 39. On November 20, after tiie Turks hod begun war,
the Eiiig of FrassU wrote thus to Bnnsen (the italics, capitals, and
excUmations are his own) : " All direct help which England i% unehn*-
UaiifollyJimigiYw TO ISLAM AGAINST OHBISTIANS! wiU
have (besidea God's arenging' judgment {bear! bear!]), no other effect
than to bring what is now Turkish territory at a somewhat later period
under Bnasian dominion" (Briefwechsel, p. 317), The reader jukj
think OvA the insamtj to which Frederick Williun BBConnibed wu
aireadj mastering liim i bat the above la no rare apaiumeD of bis qiiatolaij
■tjla.
L, ,i,z<..t,CoogIc
im. FUEDESIOK WTLLIAU. 17. 203
alliance witb this man excited tlie King's astontslimeQt
and. disgust ; and unless the Cabinet of London were
prepared to give a guarantee against any future attack
on Germany by the French Emperor, who was believed
to be ready for every political adventure, it was vain for
England to seek Prussia's aid. Lord Aberdeen coald
give no snch guarantee ; still less could he gratify the
King's strangely passionate demand for the restoration
of his authority in the Swiss canton of Neuch&tel,
which before 1848 had belonged in name to the Hohen-
zollems. Many influences were brought to bear upon
the King from the side both of England and of Russia.
The English Court and Ministers, strenuously sup-
ported by Bunsen, the Prussian ambassador, strove to
enlist the King in an active concert of Europe against
Russia by dwelling on the duties of Prussia as a Great
Power and the dangers arising to it from isolation.
On the other hand, the admiration felt by Frederick
"William for the Emperor Nicholas, and the old
habitual friendship between Prussia and Russia, gave
strength to the Czar's advocates at Berlin. Schemes
for a reconstruction of Europe, which were devised by
Napoleon, and supposed to receive some countenance
from Palmerston, reached the King's ear.* He heard
that Austria was to be offered the Danuhian Provinces
npon condition of giving up northern Italy ; that
Piedmont was to receive Lombardy, and in return to
* Tbe Treatj of alliiuoe betwerai Fr&nce utd England, to wliiolk
Pmssi* waa asked to Accede, contuiied, howerer, t elsnge pledging tlie
cantracting p&rties " uoder uo eiicnmebuieo to teek to obtun from Um
war anf adraatage b> theinsolTM.''
I i,z<..t,CoogIc
2M UODERS BUROPS. mt.
surrender Savoy to France ; that, if Austria should
decline to unite actively with the Western Powers,
revolutionary movements were to be stirred up in Italy
and in Hungary. Such reports kindled the King's rage.
" Be nnder no illusion," he wrote to his ambassador ;
"tell the British Ministers in their private ear and
on the housetops that I will not sufFer Austria to be
attacked by the revolution without drawing the sword
in its defence. If England and Prance let loose revolu-
tion as their ally, be it where it may, I unite with
Bussia for life and death." Bunsen advocated the
participation of Prussia in the European concert with
more earnestness than success. While the King was
declaiming against the lawlessness which was supposed '
to have spread from the Tuileries to Downing Street,
Bunsen, on his own authority, sent to Berlin a project
for the annexation of Bussian territory by Prussia as a
reward for its alliance with the Western Courts. This
document fell into the hands of the Russian party
at Berlin, and it roust'd the King's own indignation.
Bitter reproaches were launched against the authors of
so felonious a scheme. Bunsen could no longer retain
his office. Other advocates of the Western alliance
were dismissed from their places, and the policy of
neutrality carried the day at Berlin.
The situation of the European Powers in April,
. ^ 1854, was thus a very strange one. All
BelaOoii at lfa« Jo
totofEiSS^ tl*® ^our Powers were agreed in demand-
ing the evacuation of the Principalities
by Bussia, and in the resolution to enforce tim, if
i§u. AUSTBU AND TRUBBIA. 205
necessary, by arms. Protocols witnessiDgibis agreement
were signed on the 9th of April and the 28rd of
May,* and it was moreover declared that the Foot
Powers recognised the necessity of maintaining the
independence and the integrity of the Ottoman Slmpire.
But France and England, while they made the presence
of the Russians in the Principalities the avowed cause
of W2Lr, bitd in reality other intentions than tiie mere
expulsion of the intruder and the restoration of the
state of things previously existing. It was their desire
so to cripple Bussia that it should not again be in a
condition to menace the Ottoman Empire. This in-
tention made it impossible for the British Cabinet to
name, as the basis of a European le^^ae, that single
definite object for which, and for which alone, all the
Powers were in May, 1854, ready to unite in arras.
England, the nation and the Government alike, chose
rather to devote itself, in company with France, to the
task of indefinitely weakening Russia than, in company
with all Europe, to force Russia to one humiliating but
inevitable act of submission. Whether in the prosecu-
tion of their ulterior objects the Western Courts might
or might not receive some armed assistance from Austria
and Prussia no man could yet predict with confidence.
That Austria would to some extent make common
cause with the Allies seemed not unlikely ; that Prussia
would do so there was no real ground to believe ; on
the contrary, fair warning had been given that there
were contingencies in which Prussia might ultimately
* Eastern Vtftsn, viii 1.
I i,z<...t,CoogIc
9M UOBESS BUBOFB. UN.
be foimd on the side of the Ozar. Striving to the
utmost to discover some principle, some object, or
even some formula which might expand the purely
defensive basis accepted bj Austria and Prussia into a
common policy of reconstructive action, the Western
Powers could obtain nothing more definite from the
Conference at Vienna than the following shadowy en-
gagement : — " The Four Governments eng^;e to en-
deavour in common to discover the guarantees most
likely to attach the existence of the Ottoman Empire
to the general eqailibrium of Europe. They are ready
to deliberate as to the employment of means calculated
to accomplish the object of their agreement." This
readiness to deliberate, so cautiously professed, was a
quality in which during the two succeeding years the
Courts of Vienna and Borlin were not found wanting ;
but the war in which England and France were now
engaged was one which they had undertaken at their
own risk, and they discovered little anxiety on any side
to share their labour.
During the winter of 1853 and the first weeks of
the following year hostilities of an indecisive character
continued between the Turks and the Kussians on the
Danube. At the outbreak of the war Nicholas had
a^ofHiUrtrii, consulted the veteran Paskiewitsch as to
'■ the best road by which to march on
Constantinople. Paskiewitsch, as a strategist, knew the
danger to which a Russian force crossing the Danube
would be exposed from the presence of Austrian armies
on its flank ; as commander in the invasion of Hungary
UN. SISQB OF BILI3TBIA. . 207
in 1849 be had encountered, as he believed, ill faith
and base pealing on the part of his ally, and had repaid
it with insult and scorn : he bad learnt better than any
other man the military and the moral weakness of the
Aostrian Kmpire in its eastern part. His answer to
the Czar's inquiries was, " The road to Constantinople
lies through Vienna." But whatever bitterness the
Czar might have felt at the ingratittfde of Francis
Joseph, he was not ready for a war with Austria, in
which he could hardly have avoided the assistance of
revolutionary allies ; moreover, if the road to Constan-
tinople lay through Vienna, it might be urged that
the road to Vienna lay through Berlin. The simpler
plan was adopted of a march on the Balkans by way of
Shumla, to which the capture of Silistria was to be the
prelude. At the eod of March the Russian vanguard
passed the Danube at the lowest point where a crossing
could be made, and advanced into the Dobrudscha. In
May the siege of Silistria was undertaken by Pa.ski'j-
witsch himself. But the enterprise began too late, and
the strength employed both in the siege and in the
field-operations farther east wa.s insufficient. The
Turkish garrison, schooled by a German engineer
and animated by two young English officers, main-
tained a stubborn and efiective resistance. French and
English troops liad already lauded at Gallipoli for
the defence of Constantinople, and finding no enemy
within range had taken ship for Varna on the north of
the Balkans. Austria, on the 3rd of June, delivered its
summons reijuiring the evacuation of the FrincipaUtiea.
2M MODSRSr SUBOPB. im.
Almost at the same time Paskiewitsch received a wound
that disabled him, and was forced to sur-
^mnJ^ render bis command into other hands.
During the succeeding fortnight the be-
siegers of Silistria were repeatedly beaten back, and on
the 22nd they were compelled to raise the siege. The
Bussians, now hard pressed by an enemy whom they bad
despised, withA-ew to the north of the Danube. The
retreating movement was continued during the succeed-
ing weeks, until the evacuation of the Principalities
was complete, and the last Kussian soldier had re-
crossed the Pruth. As the invader retired, Austria
sent its troops into these border-provinces, pledging
itself by a convention with the Porte to protect them
until peace should be concluded, and then to restore
them to the Sultan.
With the liberation of the Principalities the avowed
grouud of war passed away ; but the Western Powers
had no intention of making peace without further con-
cessions on the part of Russia. As soon as
ntowwerteoi thc sicge ot Silistria was raised instnic-
tions were sent to the commanders of the
allied armies at Varna, prossiug, if not absolutely
commanding, them to attack Sebasto]>ol, the head-
quarters of Russian maritime power in the Euxine.
The capture of Sebastopol had been indicated some
months before by Napoleon III. as the most effective
blow that could be dealt to Russia, It was from Sebas-
topol that the fleet had issued which destroyed the Turks
at Sinope : until this arsenal had fallen, the growing
4U. THE roUB FOnfN. 909
QaTal might which pressed even more directly upon
Constantinople than the neighhonihood of the Czar'e
armies by land could not be permanently laid low.
The objects sought by England and France were now
giadnatly brought into sufficient clearaess to be com-
municated to the other Powers, though the more precise
interpretation of the conditions laid down rem^ed
open for future discussion. It was announced that the
Protectorate of Russia over the Danubian Principalities
and Serria must be abolished; that the navigation of
the Danube at its mouths must be freed from all
obstacles; that the Treaty of July, 1841, relating to
the Black Sea and the Dardanelles, must be revised in
the interest of the balance of power in Europe; and
that the claim to any official Protectorate over Chris-
tian subjects of the Porte, of whatever rite, must be
abandoned by the Czar. Though these conditions,
known as the Four Points, were not approved by
Prussia, they were accepted by Austria in August,
1S54, and were laid before Russia as the basis of
any negotiation for peace. The Czar declared in answer
that Russia would only negotiate on such a basis
when at the last extremity. The Allied Governments,
measuring their enemy's weakness by his failure before
Silistria, were determined to accept nothing less ; and the
attack upon Sebastopot, ordered before the evacuation
of the Principalities, was consequently allowed to take
its course.*
* Eastern F^eis, xL 8. Aahlej'B Fslmeratoii, ii. 60. For the nftvi-
gktioii o£ the monthi id Qt6 Danobe, see Diplomatae Studr, ii. 39. Rnssin,
310 MODBSN SVROPS. UM.
The Koadstead, or Great Harbour, of Sebastopol
nms due eastwards inland from a point not far from
the south-western extremity of the Crimea. One mile
from the open sea its waters divide, the
lai^er arm still running eastwards till it
meets the River Tchernaja, the smaller arm, known
as the Man- of -War Harbour, bending sharply to the
south. On both sides of this smaller harbour Sebastopol
is built. To the seaward, that is from the smaller har-
bour westwards, Sebastopol and its approaches were
thoroughly fortified. On its landward, southern, side the
town had been open till 1853, and it was still but
imperfectly protected, most weakly on the south-eastern
side. On the north of the Great Harbour Fort Constan-
tine at the head of a line of strong defences guarded the
entrance from the sea ; while on the high ground imme-
diately opposite Scbiistopol and commanding the town
there stood the Star Fort with other military constmc-
tiuns. The general features of Sebastopol were known
to the Allied commanders ; they had, however, no
precise information as to the force by which it was
held, nor as to the armament of its fortifications. It
was determined that the landing should be made in
the Bay of Eupatoria, thirty miles north of the fortress.
Here, on the 14th of September, the Allied forces,
numbering about thirty thousand French, twenty-seven
thousand English, and seven thousand Turks, effected
whloh had been in posecssion of the monthe of the Danabe einee the
Treaty of Adrinuople, and had nndertakeu to keep the months dear, had
allowed the passage to become blocked and had otherwiee preyented
traffic dosoomliiig, in otder to keep the Black Sea trade in its own handa.
int. tFVA'ilOS OF TSE CBIATEA. 211
their disembarkation without meeting anj resistance.
The Russians, commanded by Prince Menschikoff
lately envoy at Constantinople, bad taken post ten miles
farther south on high ground behind the
Biver Alma. On the 20th of September tao. crimi^
they were attacked in front by the £iDglisb,
while the French attempted a turning movement from
the sea. The battle was a scene of confusion, and for a
moment the assault of the English seemed to be rolled
back. But it was renewed with ever in- ^^^^^ ^ ^
creasing vigour, and before the French had ■"™*' "^ ""
made any impression on the Bussian left Lord Bag-
lan's troops had driven the enemy from their positions.
Struck on the flank when their front was already
broken, outnumbered and badly led, the Bussians gave
up all for lost. The form of an orderly retreat was
maintained only long enough to disguise from the
conquerors the completeness of their victory. When
night fell the Russian army abandoned itself to total
disorder, and had the pursuit been made at once it
could scarcely have escaped destruction. But St.
Amaud, who was in the last st^e of mortal illness,
refused, in spite of the appeal of Lord Ei^lan, to
press on his wearied troops. Menschikoff, abandon-
ing the hope of checking the advance of the
Allies in a second battle, and anxious only to prevent
the capture of Sebastopol by an enemy supposed to
be following at his heels, retired into the fortress, and
there sank seven of his war-ships as a barrier across
the moath of the Great Harbour, mooring the rest
o 2
S12 MODEBlf EXmOPM. lasi.
within. The crews were brought od shore to serve in
the defence by land ; the guns were dragged from the
ships to the bastions and redoubts. Then, when it
appeared that the Allies lingered, the iRussian com-
mander altered his plan. Leaving KomiloS, the Yice-
Admiral, and Todleben, an officer of engineers, to man
the existing works and to throw up new ones where
the town was undefended, MenschikoS determined to
lead off the bulk of his army into the interior of the
Crimea, in order to keep open his communications with
Russia, to await in freedom the arrival of reinforce-
ments, and, if Sebastopol should not at once fall, to
attack the Allies at bis own time and opportunity.
(September 24th.)
The English had lost in the battle of the Alma
about two thousand men, the French probably less tban
half that number. On the morning after the engage-
ment Lord Raglan proposed that the two armies should
march straight against the fortifications lying on the
north of the Great Harbour, and carry these
guns would command Sebastopol itself.
The French, supported by Burgoyne, the chief of the
English engineers, shrank from the risk of a front
attack on .works supposed to be more formidable
than they really were, and induced Lord Raglan to
consent to a long circuitous march which would bring
the armies right round Sebastopol to its more open
southern side, from which, it was thought, an assault
might be successfully made. This flank-outrch. which
UB4. BEBABTOPOL. 213
was one of extreme risk, was carried out safelj^,
Menschikoff himself having left Sebastopol, and having
passed along the same road in his retreat into the
interior a little before the appearance of the Allies.
Pushing Boathward, the English reached the sea at
Balaclava, and took possession of the harbour there,
accepting the exposed eastward line between the fortress
and the Russians outside; the French, now commanded
by Canrobert, continued their march westwards round
the back of Sebastopol, and touched the fsa, at Kasatch
Bay. The two armies were thus masters of the broken
plateau which, rising westwards from the plain of Bala-
clava and the valley of the Tcberuaya, overlooks Sebas-
topol on its southern side. That the garrison, which
DOW consisted chiefly of sailors, could at this moment
have resisted the onslaught of the fifty thousand troops
who had won the battle of the Alma, the Russians them-
selves did not believe;* but once more the French staff,
with Burgo^ne, urged caution, and it was determined
to wait for the siege-guns, which were still at sea.
The decision was a fatal one. While the Allies chose
positions for their heavy artillery and slowly landed and
placed their guns, KornilofFand Todleben made the for-
tifications on the southern side of Sebiustopol an effective
barrier before an enemy. The sacrifice of the Russian
fleet had not been in vain. The sailors were learning
all the duties of a garrison : the cannon from the ships
proved far more valuable on land. Three weeks of
• See, howerer, Bni^Dyne'a Letter to the Timet. Angnst 4, 1868,. ia
Kiuf lake, ir. 465. Bonaaet, Onerre de Crini^e, 1280. H M >] C
214 MODERN StmOPS. UH.
priceless time were given to leaders who knew how to
turn every moment to account. When,. on the 17th of
October, the bombardment which was to precede the
assault on Sebastopol began, the French artillery,
operating on the south-west, was overpowered by that
of the defenders. The fleets in vain thun-
Bombudmeat, dered agaiust the solid sea-front of the
fortress. At the end of eight days' can-
nonade, during which the besiegers* batteries poared
such a storm of shot and shell upon Sebastopol as no
fortress bad yet withstood, the defences were stUl un-
broken.
MenscbikofF in the meantime bad received the
reinforcements which he expected, and was now ready
to fall upon the besiegers from the east. His point
of attack was the English port of Balaclava and
B«toeofBata- *^^ fortified road lying somewhat east of
Bu™.oot.M. ^j^j^ which formed the outer line held by
the English and their Turkish supports. The plain of
Balaclava is divided by a low ridge into a northern and
a southern valley. Along this ridge runs the cause-
way, which had been protected by redoubts committed
to a weak Turkish guard. On the morning of the
25th the Russiaus appeared in the northern valley.
They occupied the heights rising from it on the north
and east, attacked the causeway, captured three of the
redoubts, and drove ofE the Turks, left to meet their
onset alone. Lord Kaglan, who watohcd these opera-
tions from the edge of the western plateau, ordered up
infantry from a distance, hut the only English troops
UN. SAtACtAVA. 2U
on the spot were a light and a heavy brigade of cavalry,
each numbering about six hundred men. The Heavy
Brigade, under General Scarlett, was directed to move to-
wards Balaclava itself, which was now threatened. While
they were on the march, a dense column of Bussian
cavalry, about three thousand strong, appeared above the
crest of the low ridge, ready, as it seemed, to overwhelm
the weak troops before them. But in their descent from
the ridge the Bussians halted, and Scarlett with admirable
courage and judgment formed bis men for attack, and
charged full into the enemy with the handful who were
nearest to him. They cut their way into the very heart
of the column; and before the Bussians could crush
them with mere weight the other regiments of the same
brigade hurled themselves on the right and on the left
against the huge inert mass. The Bussians broke and
retreated in disorder before a quarter of their number,
leaving to Scarlett and his men the glory of an action
which ranks with the Prussian attack at Mars-la-Tour in
1870 as the most brilliant cavalry-operation in modem
warfare. The squadrons o£ the Light Brigade, during
the peril and the victory of their coinrades, stood motion-
less, paralysed by the same defect of temper or intelli-
gence in command which was soon to devote them
to a fruitless but ever-memorable act of self-sacrifice.
Russian infantry were carrying off the cannon from the
conquered redoubts in the causeway, when an aide-de-
camp from the general-in-chief brought to the Earl of
Lucan, commander of the cavalry, an order to advance
rapidly to the front, and save these guns. Lucan, who
21« MODERir STmOTS. mi.
from his position cottld see neither the enemy nor the
guns, believed himself ordered to attack the Russian
artillery at the extremity of the northern valley, and he
directed the Light Brigade to chai^ in this direction.
It was in vain that the leader o£ the Light Brigade,
Lord Cardigan, warned his chief, in words which were
indeed but too weak, that there was a battery in front, a
battery on each flank, and that the ground was covered
with Russian riflemen. The order was repeated as
that of the head of the army, and it was obeyed. Thaa
"Into the valley of Death
Kode the Six Hundred."
How they died there, the remnant not turning till
they had hewn their way past the guns and routed
tlie enemy's cavalry behind them, the English people
will never forget.*
The day of Balaclava brought to each side some-
thing of victory and something of failure. The
Russians remained masters of the road that they had
captured, and carried off seven English guns ; the
English, where they had met the enemy, proved
that they could defeat overwhelming numbers. Not
many days passed before our infantry were put to the
Bauia of fiiktr- ^^^ which the cavalry had so victoriously
■uuo. Not. & undergone. The siege-approaches of the
French had been rapidly advanced, and it was deter-
mined that on the 6th of November the long-deferred
assault on Sebastopol should be made. On that very
morning, under cover of a thick mist, the English
* Statementa cJ Banian, Lnean, Cardigan; EiugUke^ r. 108, 402.
1st, mKERMAjm. 217
right was assailed by massiTO columns of the enemy.
Menschikoff*8 army had now risen to a hundred thou-
sand men; he had thrown troops into Sebastopol, and
had planned the capture of the English positions by a
combined attack from Sebastopol itself, and by troops
advancing from the lower ralley of the Tchemaja across
the bridge of Inkermann. The battle of the 6th of
Koyember, on the part of the English, was a soldier's
battle, without generalship, without order, without
design. The men, standing to their ground whatever
their own number and whatever that of the foe, fought,
after their ammunition was exhausted, with bayonets,
wiUi the butt ends of theii^ muskets, with their fists and
with stones. For hours the ever-surging Russian mass
rolled in upon them ; but they maintained the unequal
struggle until the arrival of French regiments saved
them from their deadly penl and the enemy were driven
in confusion from the field. The Russian columns,
marching right up to the guns, had been torn in pieces
by artUlery-fire. Their loss in kiUed and wounded was
enormous, their defeat one which no ingenuity could
disguise. Yet the battle of Inkermann had made the
capture of Sebastopol, as it had been planned by the
Allies, impossible. Their own loss was too great, the
force which the enemy had displayed was too vast, to
leave any hope that the fortress could be mastered by a
sudden assault. The terrible truth soon became plain
that the enterprise on which the armies had been sent
had in fact failed, and that another enterprise of a
quite different character, a winter siege in the presence
218 KODBBN BTmOFS. im^s*.
of a superior enemy, a campaign for wliioh no prepuu-
tioDS bad been made, and for which all that was most
necessary was wanting, formed the only alternative to
an evacuation of the Crimea.
On the 14th of November the Euiine winter began
with a etorm which swept away the tents on the ex-
posed plateau, and wrecked twenty-one vessels bearing
stores of ammunition and clothing. From this time
rain and snow turned the tract between the camp and
sbiimof Balaclava into a morass. The loss of the
""■ '*■ causeway which had been captured by the
Russians three weeks before now told with fatal effect
on the British army. The •only communication with
the port of Balaclava was by a hillside track, which
soon became impassable by carts. It was necessary to
bring up supplies on the backs of horses ; but the
liorses perished from famine and from excessive labour.
The men were too few, too weak, too destitute of the
wmtortoua lielpful ways of English sailors, to assist ia
ctinM. providing for themselves. Thus penned up
on the bleak promontory, cholera-stricken, mocked rather
than sustained during their benumbing toil with rations
of uncooked meat and green coffee-berries, the British
soldiery wasted away. Their effective force sank at
mid-winter to eleven thousand men. In the hospitals,
which even at Scutari were more dpadly to those who
passed within them than the fiercest fire of the enemy,
nine thousand men perished before the end of February.
The time indeed came when the very Spirit of Mercy
seemed to enter these abodes of woe, and in the presence
i8s»h TEB OBHiEAH WINTJBB. S19
of Florence Nightingale nature at last r^^ncd its
healing power, peetilence no longer hung in the at-
mosphere which the sufferers hreatheil, and death itself
grew mild. But before this new influence had van-
quished routine the grave had closed over whole regi-
ments of men whom it had no right to claim. The
sufferings of other armies have been on a greater scale,
but seldom has any body of troops furnished a heavier
tale of loss and death in proportion to its numbers than
the British army during the winter of the Crimean
War. The unsparing exposure in the Press of the mis-
management under wliich our soldiers were periBhing
excited an outburst of indignation which overthrew
Lord Aberdeen's Ministry and placed Palmerston in
power. It also gave to Europe at large an impres-
sion that Great Britain no longer knew how to conduct
a war, and unduly raised the reputation of the French
military administration, whose shortcomings, great as
they were, no French journalist dared to describe. In
spite of Alma and Inkermann, the military prestige
of England was injured, not raised, by the Crimean
campaign ; nor was it until the suppression of the
Indian Mutiny that the true capacity of the nation in
war was again vindicated before the world.
"I have two generals who will not fail me," the
Czar is reported to have said when be beard of Meoschi-
kofE's last defeat, " Generals January and
February." General February fulfilled his i". ««* i.
task, but he smote the Czar too. In the
fint day» of March a new monarch inherited the Bussian
2a0 UODEBIT BU&OPB. mm.
crowB.* Alexander II. ascended the throne, announcing
that he would adhere to the policy of Peter the Great,
of Catherine, and of Nicholas. But the prond tone
was meant rather for the ear of Russia than of Europe,
since Nicholas had already expressed his willinguess to
treat for peace on the hasis laid down by the Western
Powers in August, 1854. This change was not pro-
duced wholly by the battles of Alma and Inkermann.
Prussia, finding itself isolated in Germany, had after
some months of hesitation given a diplomatic sanction
to the Four Points approved by Austria as indispens-
able conditions of peace. Eussia thus stood forsaken,
as it seemed, by its only friend, and Nicholas could no
longer hope to escape with the mere abandonment of
those claims which had been the occasion of the war.
He consented to treat with his enemies on their own
terms. Austria now approached still more closely to
the Western Powers, and bound itself by treaty, in the
* On thn dpatli of Nicholas, the King of Pnissi& addressed tha follow-
ing lecture to the nnfortuiMte Bnnsen ; — " Yon little ttionght that, at the
Tery moment when yon were writing to me, one of the noblest of men, one of
tlie f^mndest forms in histoiy, oue of the truest hearta, and at the same
time one of the greatest rulera of this narrow world, was called from
faith to flight. 1 tLaiik God on mj knees that He deemed me worthy tn
be, in the beat Bonse of the word, his [Nirholaa'j friend, and to remain
true to him. You, dear Bnnsen, thoaght differently of him, and yon will
now painfuUy confess this before your conscience, most painfully of all
the truth {which all your letters in these late bad times have unfortnnately
shown me bat too plainly), that you kaied him. You listed him, not as a
man, bat as the representative of a principle, that of violence. If ever.
redeemed like him through simple faith in Christ's blood, you see him in
eternal peace, then remember wliat I now write to you : ' Yov will beg hit
pardon.' Even here, loy dear friimd. may the blessing of repentance be
granted to you," — Briefweehsel, p. 325. Frederick William seema to have
forgotteu to send the same pious wishee to the Poles in Siberia.
■L. I Cooglf
«. CONS^BENCS OF TISSSA. 821
event of peace not being concluded by the end of the
year on the stated basis, to deliberate with Prance and
England upon effectoal means for obtuning the object
of the Alliance.* Preparations were made for a Con-
ference at Vienna, from which Prussia, still
declining to pledge itself to warlike action v'™<»- 1^*"*
in case of the failure of the negotiations,
was excluded. The sittings of the Conference began a
few days after the accession of Alexander II. Bussia
was represented by its ambassador. Prince Alexander
Gortschakoff, who, as Minister of later years, was to
play so conspicuous a part in undoing the work of the
Crimean epoch. ■ On the first two Articles forming the
subject of negotiation, namely the abolition of the
Sussian Protectorate over Servia and the Principalities,
and the removal of all impediments to the free navi-
gation of the Danube, agreement was reached. On
the third Article, the revision of the Treaty of July,
1841, relating to the Black Sea and the Dardanelles,
the BoBsian envoy and the representatives of the
"Western Powers found themselves completely at
variance. Qortschakoff had admitted that the Treaty
of 1841 must be so revised as to put an end to the
preponderance of Bussia in the Black Sea ; f but while
tbe Western Governments iudsted upon the exclusion
of Bnssian war-vessels from these waters, Qortscha-
koff would consent only to the abolition of Bussia's
• PariuuneiituT Fapen, 18(M>, toL fiS, p. I, Dee. 2, 1864. Ashlej'a
PahDOMbn, ii. 84.
t Eartern F»pers, Pari 13, L
D,a,l,zc.bvG00gIe
223 MODSBir BTmOFS, vat.
preponderance by the free admission of the war-vessels (rf
all nations, or by some similar method of counterpoise.
The negotiations accordingly came to an end, but not
before Austria, disputing the contention of the Allies that
the object of the third Article could be attained only
by the specific means proposed by them, had brought
forward a third scheme based partly upon
the limitation of the Bussian navy in the
Euxine, partly upon the admission of war-ships of other
nations. This scheme was rejected by the Western
Powers, whereupon Austria declared that its obligations
under the Treaty oE December 2nd, 1854, had now been
fulfilled, and that it returned in consequence to the
position of a neutral.
Great indignation was felt and was expressed at
London and Paris at this so-called act of desertion,
and at the subsequent withdrawal of Austrian regi-
ments from the positions which they had occupied in
anticipation of war. It was alleged that in the first
two conditions of peace Austria had seen its own
special Interests efiectually secured ; and that as soon
as the Court of St. Petersburg had given the neces-
sary assurances on these heads the Cabinet of Vienna
was willing to sacrifice the other objects of the
Alliance and to abandon the cause of the Maritime
Powers, in order to regain, with whatever loss of honour,
the friendship of the Czar. Though it was answered
with perfect truth that Austria had never accepted the
principle of the exclusion of Russia from the Black
Sea, and was still ready to take up arms in defence of
that system by wbicb it considered that Bassia's pre-
ponderance in tbe Black Sea might be most suitably
prevented, this argument sounded hollow to com-
batants convinced of the iutility of all methods for
holding Russia in check except their own. Austria
bad grievously injured its own position and credit with
tbe "Western Powers. On the other hand it bad
wounded Russia too deeply to win from tbe Czar the
forgiveness wbicb it expected. Its policy of balance,
whether best described as too subtle or as too impartial,
had miscarried. It had forfeited its old, without ac-
quiring new, friendships. It remained isolated in Europe,
and destined to meet without support and without an
ally tbe blows which were soon to fall upon it.
Tbe prospects of the besieging armies before Sebas-
topol were in some respects better towards tbe close of
January, 1855, than they were when the
Conference of Vienna commenced its sit- rtw., j^buj
— M«j, 18&S.
tings six weeks later. Sardinia, tmder the
guidance of Cavour, bad joined the Western Alliance,
and was about to send fifteen thousand soldiers to the
Crimea. A new plan of operations, which promised
excellent results, had been adopted at headquarters.
Up to the end of 1854 the French bad directed their
main attack against the Fl^staff bastion, a little to
the west of the head of tbe Man-of-War Harbour.
They were now, however, convinced by Lord Raglan
that the true keystone to the defences of Sebastopol was
the Malakoff, on the eastern side, and they under-
took the reduction of this formidable work, while
221 MODSBN SUBOPX. au.
the British directed their eSbrts i^inst the neigh-
bouring Bedan.* The heaviest fire of the besiegers
being thus concentrated on a narrow line, it seemed
as if Sebastopol must soon fall. But at the be-
ginning of February a sinister change came over the
French camp. General Niel arrived from Paris vested
with powers which really placed him in control of
the general-in-cbief ; and though Canrobert was but
partially made acquainted with the Emperor's designs,
he was forced to sacrifice to them much of his own
honour and that of the army. Napoleon bad deter-
mined to come to the Crimea himself, and at the fitting
moment to end by one grand stroke the war which
had dragged so heavily in the bands of others. He
believed that Sebastopol could only be taken by a com-
plete investment; and it was his design to land with
a fresh army on the south-eastern coast of the Crimea,
to march across the interior of the peninsula, to sweep
MenschikofF's forces from their position above the
Tchernaya, and to complete the investment of Sebasto-
pol from the north. "With this scheme of operations ia
view, all labour expended in tbe attack on Sebastopol
from the south was efibrt thrown away. Canrobert,
who had promised his most vigorous co-operation to
Lord Raglan, was fettered and paralysed by the Em-
peror's emissary at headquarters. For three successive
months the Russians not only held their own, but by
means of counter-approaches won back from the French
some of the ground that they had taken. The verv
t Kisgl^e, vii. 21. Bouwpt, U. 3^ 148.
I i,z<..t,Coo'gIf
m. r^LIBBIBB. 225
existence of the Alliance was threatened when, after
Canrobert and Lorii Baglan liad despatched a force to
seize the Russian posts on the Sea of Azof, the French
portion of this force was peremptorily recalled by the
Smperor, in order that it might be employed ' in the
inarch northwards across the Crimea. At length, un-
able to endure the miseries of the position,
Canrobert asked to be relieTcd of his com-
mand. He was succeeded by General
Pflissier. P^lissier, a resolute, enei^tic soldier, one
moreover who did not owe his promotion to complicity
in the coup d'etat, flatly refused to ob«y the Emperor's
orders. Sweeping aside the flimsy schemes evolved at
the Tuileries, he returned with all his heart to the plan
agreed upon by the Allied commanders at the beginning
of the year ; and from this time, though disasters were
still in store, they were not the result of faltering
or disloyalty at the headquarters of the French army.
The general assault on the MalakofE and the Bedan
was fixed for the 18th of June. It was pmum,, .
bravely met by the Russians; the Allies — '"^••™'«-
were driven back with heavy loss, and three months
more were added to the duration of the siege. Lord
Raglan did not live to witness the last stf^ of the
war. Exhausted by his labours, heartsick at the failure
of the great attack, he died on the 28th of June, leaving
the oonunand to Otmeral Simpson, an officer far his
inferior. Ab the lines of the besiegers approached
nearer and nearer to the Russian fortifications, the army
whicK had been defeated at Inkermann advanced for
226 MODEEIT EVEOPS. mk.
one last effort Crossing the Tcheroaya, it gave battle
on the 16th of August. The French and the Sar-
diniaos, without assistance from the British
Tdieronja, aruiy, won a decisive victory. Sebastopol
could hope no longer for aseistauce
from without, and on the 8th of September the
cptum of tiu ^^ow which had failed in June was dealt
iu>kDif,Bept8. ^^^ more. The French, throwing them-
selves in great strength upon the Malakoff, carried thl<i
fortress by storm, and frustrated every effort made for
its recovery ; the British, attacking the Eedan with a
miserably weak force, were beaten and overpowered.
But the fall of the MalakoS was in itself equivalent to
the capture of Sebastopol. A few more hours passed,
and a series of tremendous explosions made known to
the Allies that the Eussian commander was blowing up
his magazines and withdrawing to the north of the
Ml of 8eb«. Great Harbour. The prize was at length
*i>poi,aefL9. YfQo.^ and at the end of a siege of three
hundred and fifty days what remained of. the Czar's
great fortress passed into the hands of his enemies.
The Allies had lost since their landing in the
Crimea not less than a hundred thoosand men. An
enterprise undertaken in the belief that it would be
accomplished in the course of a few weeks, and wiili
no greater sacrifice of life than attends evety
attack upon a fortified place, had proved
arduous and terrible almost beyond example. Yet if
the Crimean campaign was the result of eiTor and
blindness on the part of the invaders, it was perhaps
im. FALL Of SBBA3T0P0L. 227
even more disastrous to Bussia than any warfare in
which an enemy would have been likely to engage with
fuller knowledge of the conditions to be met. The vast
distances that separated Sebastopol from the military
depftts in the interior of Russia made its defence a drain
of the most fearful character on the levies and the re-
sources of the country. What tens of thousands sank
in the endless, unsheltered march without ever nearing
the sea, what provinces were swept of their beasts of
burden, when every larger shell fired againat the enemy
had to be borne hundreds of miles by oxen, the records
of the war but vaguely make known. The total loss
of the Russians should perhaps be reckoned at three
times that of the Allies. Yet the faU of Sebastopol was
not immediately followed by peace. The hesitation of
the Allies in cutting off the retreat of the Russian
army had enabled its commander to retain bis hold upon
the Crimea ; in Asia, the delays of a Turkish relieving
army gave to the Czar one last gleam of success in the
capture of Kars, which, after a strenuous pujrfKi™,
resistance, succumbed tp famine on the 28th ^'"' "^
of November. But before Kars had fallen negotiations
for peace had commenced. Fmnce was weary of the
war. Napoleon, himself unwilling to continue it except
at the price of French aggrandisement on the Continent,
was surrounded by a band of palace stock-jobbers who
had staked everything on the rise of the funds that
would result from peace. It was known at every Court
of Europe that the Allies were completely at variance
with one another ; that while the English nation, stmig
, 2 , Cmwlc
228 MODBBN EVROPS. MR.
by the failare of its military administration during the
winter, by the nullity of its naval operations in tbe
Baltic, and by the final disaster at the Sedan, was
eager to prove its real power in a new campaign, the
ruler of France, satisfied with the crowning glory of
the Malakofi", was anxious to conclude peace on any
tolerable terms. Secret communications from St.
Petersburg were made at Paris by Baron Seebach,
envoy of Saxony, a son-in-law of the Bos-
sian Chancellor : the Austrian Cabinet, still
bent on acting the part of arbiter, but hopeless of the
results of a new Conference, addressed itself to the
Emperor Napoleon singly, and persuaded him to enter
into a negotiation which was concealed for a while from
Great Britain. The two intrigues . were simultaneously
pursued by our ally, but Seebach's proposals were sudi
that even tbe warmest friends of Russia at the Tuilcries
could scarcely support them, and the Viennese diplo-
matists won the day. It was agreed that a note con-
taining Preliminaries of Peace should be presented by
Austria at St. Petersburg as its own ultimatum, after
tbe Emperor Napoleon should have won from the British
Government its assent to these terms without any
alteration. The Austrian project embodied indeed the
Four Points which Britain had in previous months
fixed as the conditions of peace, and in substance it
differed little from what, even after the fall of Sebastopol,
British statesmen were still prepared to accept ; hut it
was impossible that a scheme completed without the
participation of Britain and laid down for ita passive
M. TBAOa imOOnATIONB. 229
acceptance should be thus ancomplamingly adopted by
its Government. Lord Pahnerston required that the
rour Articles enumerated should be understood to cover
points not immediately apparent on their surface, and
that a fifth Article should be added reserving to tbe
Powers the right of demanding certein further special
conditions, it being understood that Great Britain would
require under this clause only that Bussia should bind
itself to leave the Aland Islands in the Baltic Sea
unfortified. Modified in accordance with the demand
of the British Government, the Austrian draft was
presented to the Czar at the end of December, with
the notification that if it was not accepted by the 16th
of January the Austrian ambassador would quit St.
Petersburg. On the 1 5th a Council was held in the
presence of the Czar. Nesselrode, who first gave his
opinion, urged that the continuance of the war would
plunge Russia into hostilities with all Europe, and
advised submission to a compact which would last only
until Russia had recovered its strength or new relations
had arisen among the. Powers. One Minister after
another declared that Poland, Finland, the Crimea, and
the Caucasus would be endangered if peace were not
now made; the Chief of the Finances stated tliat Uussia
could not go through another campaign without bank-
ruptcy.* At the end of the discussion the Council
declared nnaDimously in favour of accepting the Aus-
trian propositions; and although the national feeling
was still in favour of resistance, there appears to have
* Diplomatic Stndj, iL 361. Uutiii, Prinoe ConMui, iii. 394.
290 UODEBN EUBOPB. tML
been one Enssian statesman alone. Prince Qortschakoff,
ambassador at Vienna, who sought to dissuade the
Czar from making peace. His adrice was not taken.
The vote of the Conncil was followed by the despatcli
of plenipotentiaries to Paris, and here, on the 25th of
Pebraary, 1856, the envoys of all the Powers, with
the exception of Prussia, assembled in Conference, in
order to frame the definitive Treaty of Peace. *
In the debates which now followed, and which
occupied more than a month, Lord Clarendon, who
confennBcif represented Great Britain, discovered that in
Fuji, Stb. M,
IBM. each contested point he had to fight gainst
the Russian and the French envoys combined, so com-
pletely was the Court of the Tuileries now identified with
a policy of conciliation and friendliness towards Kussia.f
Great firmness, great plaioaess of speech was needed
on the part of the British Government, in order tu
prevent the recognised objects of the war from being
surrendered by its ally, not from a conviction that they
were visionary or unattainable, but from unsteadiness of
piirpose and from the desire to convert a defeated enemy
into a friend. The end, however, was at
length reached, and on the 30th of March
the Treaty of Paris was signed. The Black Sea was
■ Prussia was Bdmitted when Uie first Articles had been settled, nod it
became necessarj to revise the Traatj of Jidj, 1841, of which Prussia had
been one of the signatories.
f " In the course of the deliberation, wheneTor our [Rossian] plenipo-
tentiaries found themseivus in the presence of insiirmooutabla difficnltic«,
they appealed to the personal intervention of tliis sovereiga [Napoleon],
and had only to cimgratulate themeelTes on tiie iMolL" — Diplomatic
Stndj. ii. 877.
Tm^ot Fuia,
)ifue£ ao, iSfiO.
,zc.bvGoogIe
UN. TSEATr OF PAMI8. 831
Dentmlised ; its waters and ports, thrown open to the
mercantile marine of every nation, were foroially and
in perpetuity interdicted to the war-ships both of the
Powers possessing its coasts and of all other Powers.
The Czar and the Sultan undertook not to establish or
maintain upon its coasts any military or maritime
arsenal. Russia ceded a portion of Bessarabia, accept-
ing a frontier which excluded it from the Danube. The
free navigation of this river, henceforth to be effectively
mMntained by an international Commission, was de-
clared part of the public law of Europe. The Powers
declared the Sublime Porte admitted to participate in
the advantages of the public law and concert of Europe,
each engaging to respect the independence and integrity
of tbe Ottoman Empire, and all guaranteeing in common
the strict observance of this engagement, and promising
to consider any act tending to its violation as a question
of general interest. The Sultan " having, in his con-
stant solicitude for the welfare of his subjects, issued a
finnan recording his generous intentions towards the
Christian population of his empire,* and having com-
municated it to the Powers," the Powers "recognised
• Three pnges of promiBes, Eastern F&pera, xvii. One was kept
fuftfoUj. " To acouiplisli these objecta, means shall be songht to profit
by the acienc«. t}ie art, anil the funds of Enrope." One of the drollest
of the propheniee of that time is the cou^rratolatory address of the Mis-
sionaries to Lord Stratford de Redcliffo, id. 1882 :— " The Imperial
Hatti-sherif has convinced as that onr fond expectations are likelj to be
naKsed. The light will shine npon those who have long sat in darkness ;
ud blest bf social prosperity and religions freedom, the millions of
Tnrkej will, we trost, be seen ere long sitting peiicefnlly under their own
Tins and fig-tree." So thej were, and with poor Lord Stratford's fortune,
UDODg others, iu their pockets.
D,a,l,zc.bvG00gIe
232 KODEBN SUROPB. mt.
the Iiigh value of this communicatioii," declaring at
the same time "that it could not, in any caae, give to
them the right to interfere, either collectively or separ-
ately, in the relations of the Sultan to his suhjects, or
in the internal administration of his empire." The
Banuhian Principalities, augmented hy the strip of
Bessarahia taken from Bussia, were to continue to
enjoy, under the suzerainty of the Porte and iinder the
guarantee of the Powers, all the privileges and immu-
nities of which they were in possession, no eiclusive
protection heing exercised hy any of the guaranteeing
Powers.*
Passing beyond the immediate subjects of nego-
tiation, the Conference availed itself of its international
character to gain the consent of Great Britain to a
change in the laws of maritime war. England had
always claimed, and had always exercised, the right to
seize an enemy's goods on the high sea
™ 'rirtii"!;! though conveyed in a neutral vessel, and to
"" stop and search the merchant-ships of neu-
trals for this purpose. The exercise of this right had
stirred up gainst England the Maritime League of
1800, and was condemned by nearly the whole civilised
world. Kothing short of an absolute command of the
seas made it safe or possible for a single Power to main-
tain a practice which threatened at moments of danger
to turn the whole body of neutral States into its
enemies. Moreover, if the seizure of belligerents' goods
in neutral ships profited England when it was itself at
• AH TerbiOm from the Treaty. Pari Papom, 186^ toI. 61, fi 1,
ML TREATY OF PAB18. 233
war, it iojored Englaod at all times wlieu it remained
at peace during the struggles of other States. Similarly
bj the issue of privateers England inflicted great injury
oi. its enemies ; but its own commerce, ezceedtng that
of every other State, offered to the privateers of its foes
a still richer booty. The advant^es of the existing
laws of maritime war were not altogether on the side of
Sngland, though mistress of the seas ; and in return
for the abolition of privateering, the British Govern-
ment consented to surrender its sharpest, but most
dangerous, weapon of offence, and to permit the pro-
ducts of a hostile State to find a market in time of war.
The rule was laid down that the goods of an enemy
other than contraband of war should henceforth be safe
under a neutral flag. Neutrals* goods discovered- on
an enemy's ship were similarly made exempt from
capture.
The enactments of the Conference of Paris relating
to commerce in time of hostilities have not yet been
subjected to the strain of a war between England and
any European State ; its conclusions on all other sub-
jects were but too soon put to the test, and _
have one after another been found want- S*iSS^
ing. If the Power which calls man into ''"
his moment of life could smile at the efforts and the
assumptions of iis creatnre, such smile might have been
moved by the assembly of statesmen who, at the close
of the Crimean War, affected to shape the future of
Eastern Europe, They persuaded themselves that by
dint of the iteration of certain phrases they couI4
8M MODEUN EUnOPS. HML
convert the Sultan and his hungry troop of Pashas
into the chiefs of a European State. They im^ined
that the House of Osman, which in the st^es of a
continnouB decline had successively lost its sway over
Hungary, over Servia, over Southern Greece and the
Dauubiau Provinces, and which would twice within the
last twenty-five years have seen its Empire dashed to
pieces by an Egyptian vassal but for the intervention of
Europe, might be arrested in its decadence by an incan-
tation, and be made strong enough and enlightened
enough to govern to all time the Slavic and Greek
populations which had still the misfortune to be in-
cluded within its dominions. Recoguising — so ran the
words which read like bitter irony, but which were
meant for nothing of the kind — the value of the Sul-
tan's promises of reform, the authors of the Treaty of
Paris proceeded, as if of set purpose, to extinguish any
vestige o£ responsibility which might have heen felt at
Constantinople, and any spark of confidence that might
still linger among the Christian populations, by de-
claring that, %vhet1ier the Sultan observed or broke his
promises, in no case could any right of intervention by
Europe arise, Tlie helmsman was given his course ;
the hatches were battened down. If words bore any
meaning, if the Treaty of Paris Wiis not an elahorat«
piece of imposture, the Christian subjects of the Sultan
had for the future, whatever might be their wrongs,
no redress to look for hut in the exertion of their own
power. The terms of the Treaty were in fact such as
might have been imposed if the Western Powers had
un. TESATY OF PASIS. 23S
gone to war with Russia for some object of their own,
and had been rescued, when defeated and OTerthrown,
l^ the Tictorious interposition of the Porte. All was
hollow, all based on fiction and convention. The
iUasions of nations in time of reTolutioaarj ezcitement,
tlie shallow, sentimental commonplaces of liberty and
fratemitj have afforded just matter for satire ; but no
democratic platitudes were ever more palpably devoid
of connection with fact, more fiagrantly in conlradiction
to the experience of the past, or more ignominiously to
he refuted by each succeeding act of history, than the
deliberate consecration of the idol of an Ottoman Em-
pire as the crowning act of European wisdom in 1856.
Among the devotees of the Turk the English Minis-
ters were the most impassioned, having indeed in the
possession of India some excuse for their fervour on
behalf of any ima^^able obstacle that would keep the
Bussians out of Constantinople. The Emperor of the
French had during the Conferences at
Paris revived his project of incorporating
the Danubian Principalities w^th Austria in return for
the cession of Lombardy, but the Viennese Glovemment
had declined to enter into any such arrangement. Na-
poleon consequently entered upon a new Eastern poliqr.
Appreciating the growing force of nationality in Euro-
pean affairs, and imagining that in the championship of
the principle of nationality against the Treaties of 1315
he would sooner or later find means for the aggrandise-
ment of himself and France, he proposed that the Pro-
vinces of Moldavia and Wallachia, while remaining in
239 XODERir EUSOFB. MK
dependence upon the Salian, should be nnited into a
single State under a prince chosen by thenaselres. The
English Ministry would not hear of this anion. In
their view the creation of a Iloumanian Principality
under a chief not appointed by the Porte was simply
the abstraction from the Sultan of six million persons
who at present acknowledged his suzerainty, and whose
tribute to Constantinople ought, according to Lord
Clarendon, to be increased.* Austria, fearing the effect
of a Roumanian national movement upon its own
Roumanian subjects in Transylvania, joined in resist-
ance to Napoleon's scheme, and the political organisation
of the Principalities was in consequence reserved by the
Conference of Paris for future settlement. Elections
were held in the spring of 1857 under a decree from
the Porte, with the result that Moldavia, as it seemed,
pronounced against union with the sister province.
But the complaint at once arose that the Porte had
falsified the popular vote. France and Russia had now
established relations of such amity that their ambassa-
dors jointly threatened to quit Constantinople if the
elections were not annulled. A visit paid by the
French Emperor to Queen Victoria, with the object of
smoothing over the difficulties which had begun to
threaten the Western alliance, resulted rather in in-
creased misunderstandings between the two Govern-
ments as to the future of the Principalities than in any
real agreement. The elections were annulled. New
i^resentative bodies met at Bucharest and Jassy, and
• M»rtm. Prince Consort, iu. 452. PtxOa, BbtOori, n. 8M. ;
ISS7-M. S-OVHAHtL 887
pronoanced almost unaDimouslj for nniou (Octol)er,
1857). In the spring of 1858 the Conference of Paris
reassembled in order to frame a . final settlement of the
affairs of the Principaliti^. It determined that in each
Province there should be a Hospodar elected for life, a
separate judicature, and a separate legislative Assembly,
white a central Commission, formed by reprci^entatives
of both Provinces, should lay before the Assemblies
projects of law on matters of joint interest. In ac-
cordance with these provisions, Assemblies were elected
in each Principality at the beginning of 1859. Their
first duty was to choose the two Hospodara, but in
both Provinces a UDanimous vote fell upon
the same person. Prince Alexander Cuza. Hm^Sat ^
The efforts of England and Austria to pre-
vent anion were thus baffled by the Roumanian people
itself, and after three years the elaborate arrangements
made by the Conference weie similarly ^^ ,
swept away, and a single Ministry and "**■
Assembly toot the place of the dual Government. It
now remained only to substitute a hereditary Prince for
-a Hospodar elected for life; and in 186G, on the ex-
pulsion of Alexander Cuza by his subjects. Prince
Charles of Hohenzollern - Sigmaringen, a
distant kinsman of the reigning Prussian J{|!.l^'i^|Ij'™
sovereign, was recognised by all Europe
as Hereditary Prince of Roumania. The suzerainty of
the Porte, now reduced to tlie bare right to receive a
fixed tribute, was foted to last but for a few years
'<>°S«'- L .„,., Google
238 MOSEBir EUBOPK lat^.
Europe liad not to wait for tlie establishmeDt of
Eoumanian independeoce in order to judge of the fore-
siglit and the etatesmanship of the authors of the
Treaty of Paris. Scarcely a year passed without the
occurrence of some event that cast ridicule upon the
fiction of a self-regenerated Turkey, and upon the pro-
fession of the Powers that the epoch of external inter-
, ference in its affairs was at an end. The active
misgovernmeni; of the Turkish authorities themselves,
their powerlessness or want of will to
CbnUimad dl» ' , ' -
o^teTaAiA prevent nagrant outrage ana wrong among
those whom they professed to rule, con-
tinued after the Treaty of Paris to be exactly what
they had been before it. In 1860 massacres and
civil war in Mount Lebanon led to the occupation
of Syria by French troops. In 1861 Bosnia and
Herzegovina took up arms. In 1863 Servia expelled
its Turkish garrisons. Crete, rising in the follow-
ing year, fought long for its independence, and
seemed for a moment likely to be united with Greece
under the auspices of the Powers, but it was finally
abandoned to its Ottoman masters. At the end of
fourteen years from the signature of the Peace of Paris,
^onofa. *^^ downfall of the French Empire enabled
g«t,ofP^ Russia to declare that it would no longer
wT.- 1. ^^cognise the provisions of the Treaty
the BI T^*^"^ '** "'"^^'P^ '^^ **« ^™^°^« from
«lone th„* i*' /* ^^^ ^°'" *^'''' ^""^ f""- tl'is almost
War.' Buff .^ f ^^ ^^'^^ *^™"^''' the Crimean
-it for the determination of Lord Palmerston to
WMli TBSATY OF PABIS. 23d
exclude Kassia from the Black Sea, peace might have
been made while the Allied armies were still at Yama.
This exclusion was alleged to he necessary in the in-
terests of Europe at large ; that it was really enforced
not in the interest of Europe but in the interest of
England was made sufficiently clear by the action of
Austria and Prussia, whose statesmen, in spite of the
discoorses so freely addressed to them from London,
were at least as much alive to the interests of their
respective countries as Lord Palmerston conld be on
their behalf. Nor had France in 1854 any interest in
crippling the power of Russia, or in Eastern aflfairs
generally, which could be remotely compared with those
of the possessors of India. The personal needs of
Napoleon III. made him, while he seemed to lead, the
instrument of the British Government for enforcing
British aims, and so gave to Palmerston the momentaiy
shaping of a new and superficial concert of the Powers.
Masters of Sebastopol, the Allies had experienced little
difficulty in investing their own conclusions with the
seeming authorily of Europe at laige ; but to bring
the representatives of Austria and Prussia to a Council-
table, to hand them the pen to sign a Treaty dictated
by Erance and England, was not to bind them to a
policy which was not their own, or to make those
things interests of Austria and Prussia which were not
their interests before. Thus when in 1870 the French
Empire fell, England stood alone as the Power con-
cerned in maintaining the exclusion of Bussia from the
Eoxine, and this exclusion it coold enforce no longer. It
240 UODERtr SVROPS. uM-m.
was well thaA, Palmersiqn had made the Treaty of Paris
the act of Europe, but not for the reasoos which Pal-
merston had im^ined. The fiction had engendered no
new relation in fact ; it did not prolong for one hour
the submission of Bussia after it had ceased to he con-
fronted in the West by a superior force ; but it enabled
Great Britain to retire without official humiliation from
a position which it had conquered only through the
help of an accidental Alliance, and which it was unable
to maintain alone. The ghost of the Conference of
1856 was, as it were, conjured up in the changed world
of 1871. The same forms which had once stamped with
the se:d of Europe the instrument of restraint npon
Russia now as decorously executed its release. Britain
accepted what Europe would not resist ; and below the
slopes where lay the countless dead of three nations
Sebastopol rose from its ruins, and the ensign of Bussia
Boated oucc more over its ships of war.
D,a,l,zc.bvG00gIe
CHAPTBB IV.
Fiedinont after IS49— Uinutiy of Aieglio— Oktoui Prlnw Uinister— Desi)(n« of
Obtout — Hi» Crimetui Policy — Cavour kt the Confereace of Paris— Carour
and Napoleon III. — Ths Meeting at PIombiAiea — Preparationa in Italy-
Treaty of JaniuiT, 1B69— AUompta at Uediatiun — Austriuii Ultimatuni—
Oampaign of 1S6S — MagnnU — MoTement in CentnJ Italy — Solferino^
Napoleon and PnuBia — Interview of Tillafranca — Cavour resigna — Peace
of Zurich— Central Italy after ViUafmncft— The Proposed Congress— " Tha
Fops and ths Congreas "-^Oavonr lemmw office — Cavour and Napoleon —
Union of the Duchies and the Bomagna with Piedmont— Savoy and Nice
added to Pninoe — Cavoor on this csadoa — European opinion— Naplec —
Bialy — Garibaldi lands at WaraaU — Oaptnro of Palenno — The Xeapoll-
lans evacuate Sicily — Cavoui and tlie Party ol Action — Cavoor'a Policy a*
to Naptea — Qaribaidi on the Mainland — Penano and TiUomarinaat Naple*
— Qaijbaldi at Naples — The Kedmontesa Army enters Umbria and the
Harches — Pall of Anoona — Garibaldi and Oavoar — The Arniies on the
Toltnmo — Fall of Qaeta— Caronr'a Policy with reganl to Borne and
Tenioe— Death of Oavour— The Frae Chorch in the Free State.
In the gloomy years that followed 1849 the kingdom of
Sardinia had stood out in bright relief as a State which,
though crashed on the battle-field, had re- rbOaeBtmitm
mained true to the canse of liberty while *"*■
all aronnd it the forces of reaction gained triumph after
triamph. Its King had not the intellectual gifts of the
maker of a great State, but he was one with whom those
possessed of Boch gifts conld work, and on whom they
could depend. With certain grave private faults "Victor
Emmanuel had the public virtues of intense patriotism,
of loyalty to his engagements and to his Ministers,
of deTotion to a single great aim- Little ^iven to
Q CoLV^Ic
242 MOVBlOf BVBOPB. v»^
specnlaiiTe thought, he saw what it most concerned him
to see, that Piedmont by making itself the home of
liberty coutd become the Master-State of Italy. His
courage on the hattle-fidd, splendid and animating as
it was, distinguished him less than another kind of
courage peculiarly his own. Ignorant and supersti-
tious, he had that rare and masculine quality of soul
which in the anguish of bereavement and on the verge
of the unseen world remains proof against the appeal
and against the terrors of a voice speaking with more
than human authority. Borne, not less than Austria,
stood across the path that led to Italian freedom, and
employed all its art, all its spiritual force, to turn
Victor Emmanuel from the work that lay before
him. There were moments in his life when a man
of not more than common weakness might well have
flioched from the line of conduct on which he had
resolved in hours of strength and of insight ; there
were times when a less constant mind might well
have wavered and cast a balance between opposing
systems of policy. It was not through heroic great-
ness that Yictor Emmanuel rendered his priceless
services to Italy. He was a man not conspicuously
cast in a different mould from many another plain,
strong nature, but the qualities which he possessed were
precisely those which Italy required. Fortune, circum-
stance, position favoured him and made his glorious —
work possible ; hut what other Italian prince of this
century, though placed on the throne of Piedmont, and
numbering Cavoor among his subjects, would have
played the part, the simple jet all moinentoas part,
which Victor Emmaoael played bo well ? The lore and
the gratitude of Italy have been lavished without stint
on the memory of its first sovereign, who served his
nation with qualities of so homely a type, and in whose
life there was so much that needed pardon. The colder
judgment of a later time will hardly contest the title of
Victor Emmanuel to be ranked among those few men
without whom Italian union would not have been
achieved for another generation.
On the conclusion of peace with Austria after the
campaign of Novara, the Oovemment and the Parlia-
ment of Turin addressed themselves to the work of
emancipating'the State from the system of ecclesiastical
privilege and clerical ascendency which had continued
in full vigour down to the last year of Charles Albert's
reign. Since 1814 the Church had maintained, or had
recovered, both in Piedmont and in the island of Sar-
dinia, rights which had been long wrested from it in
other European societies, and which were out of har-
mony with the Constitution now taking root under
Victor Emmanuel. The clergy had still their own
tribunals, and even in the case of criminal ^^ ^^
offences were not subject to the jurisdiction ""' '®**^
of the State. The Bishops possessed excessive powers
and too large a share of the Church revenues; the
parochial clei^ lived in want ; monasteries and con-
vents abounded. It was not in any spirit of hostility
towards the Church that Massimo d'Azegho, whom tiie
King called to of&ce after I^ovara, commenced the work of
« 3 - "'81'-'
244 MODERN EUBOPS. lB»-m.
rLform by measures subjecting the clergy to tbe law-conrts
of the State, abolishing the right of sanctuary in monas-
teries, and limiting the power of corporations to acquire
landed property. If the Papacy would have met Victor
Emmanuel in a fair spirit his Gorernment would, gladly
have avoided a dangerous and exasperati»g struggle ;
but aU the forces and the passions of XJltramontanism
were brought to bear against the proposed reforms. Tbe
result was that the Minister, abandoned by a section of
the Conservative party on whom he had relied, sought
the alliance of men ready for a larger and bolder policy,
and called to office the foremost of tliose from whom he
had received an independent support in the Chamber,
Count Cavour. Entering the Cabinet 'in 1850 as
Minister of Commerce, Cavour rapidly became the
master of all his colleagues. On his own re.'fponsibility
he sought and won the suppoi-t of the more moderate
section of the Opposition, headed by Eattazzi ; and after
carour Prime ^ brief witlidrawiil from office, caused by
itiaiter, 1803. 3 ■ - ■ ■
divisions within the Cabinet, he returned to
power in October, 1852, as Prime Minister.
Cavour, though few men have gained greater fame
aa diplomatists, had not been trained in official hie.
o.™„r. ^^^ younger son of a noble family, he had
^^ entered the army in 1826, and served in the
mefr7?« ^"*' ^'^ sympathies with the liberal more-
I'is chief XT*"''*"^''* '"*" '"**' extreme disfavour with
IVinco of C '^''' described by Charles Albert, then
l'i'%'«3om anr^"^°°' ^ *'"' "'°"*^ dangerous man in the
' "" "--^ t^-n« Wd at the instance of his own
[!,a,l,zc.bvG00gJc
father to the solitary Alpine fortress of Bard. Too
Tigoroos a nature to submit to inaction, too bnojant
and too sagacious to resort to conspiracy, he quitted the
army, and soon afterwards undertook the maoi^ment
of one of the family estates, devoting himself to scien-
tific agriculture on a large scale. He was a keen and
successful man of business, but throughout the next
twelve years, which he passed in fruitful private industry,
his miud dwelt ardently on public af^iirs. He was
filled with a deep discontent at the state of society
which he saw around him in Piedmont, and at the con-
dition of Italy at large nuder foreign and clerical rule.
Repeated visits to France and JEngland made hira
familiar with the institutions of freer lands, and gave
definiteness to bis political and social aims.* In
1847, when changes were following fast, he founded
with some other Liberal nobles the journal Risor-
ffitnento, devoted to the cause of national revival ;
and he was one of the first who called upon
King Charles Albert to grant a Constitution. During
the stormy days of 1848 he was at once the vigorous
advocate of war with Austria and the adversary of
Bepablicans and Extremists who for their own theories
seemed willing to plunge Italy into anarchy. Though
unpopul^ with the mob, he was elected to the Chamber
by Turin, and continued to represent the capital after
the peace. Up to this time there had been Httle
opportunity for the proof of his extraordinary powers,
* Berti. OarcniT wraiiti 1818, p. 110. LaBiTe.OsToni'.fLfiS. OaToor,
Lettece (ad. Gliula.], bkod. p. 7a
2M MODESS SUSOPS. bmh
bat the iobom sagacity of Victor Emmanuel bad already
discemed in him a man who could not remain in a
subordinate position. " You will see him turn yon all
out of your places," the King remarked to his Ministers,
as he gare his assent to Cavour's first appointment to a
seat in the Cabinet.
The Ministry of Azeglio had served Piedmont with
honour from 1849 to 1852, but its leader scarcely pos-
sessed the daring and fertility of mind which the time
required. Cavour threw into the work of Government
a passion and intelligence which soon produced results
visible to all Europe. His devotion to Italy was as
deep, as all-absorbing, as that of Mazzini
himself, though the methods and schemes
or the two men were in such complete antagonism.
Cavour's fixed purpose was to drive Austria out of
Italy by defeat in the battle-field, and to establish, as
the first step towards national union, a powerful king-
dom of Northern Italy under Victor EmmanueL In
order that the military and naval forces of Piedmont
tmght be raised to the highest possible strength and
efBciency, he saw that the resources of the country
must be largely developed; and vnth this object he
negoti;ited commercial treaties with Foreign Powers,
the ^''''°/''""'^^"' ^"'^ -oppressed the greater part of
devowl ""' ''"'^^ *''^'^ l^-^« +o cultivators, and
*» the pa™enro7'.r' '^' °°* *° Stat«-purposes but
vanced thT h ^-orking clergy. Industry ad-
^'ne; the ^^^''^ ^'■««8ure of taxation was patienUy
«^y and the fleet grew apace. But tl«
DiailizccbvGoOgIC
ixa^m. CArOUB. U7
cause of Piedmoot was one witli that of tlie Italian
nation, and it became its Government to demonstrate
tbis day by day with no faltering roice or band. Pro-
tection and support were given to fugitives from Aus-
trian and Papal tyranny ; the Press was laid open to
every tale of wrong ; and when, after an unsuccessful
attempt at insurrection in Milan in 1853, for which
MazzinI and the Republican exiles were alone respon-
sible, the Austrian Government sequestrated the
property of its subjects who would not return from
Piedmont, Cavour bade his ambassador quit Vienna,
and appealed to every Court in Europe. Nevertheless,
Cavour did not believe that Italy, even by a simulta-
neous rising, could permanently expel the Austrian
armies or conquer the Austrian fortresses. The expe-
rience of forty years pointed to the opposite conclusion;
and while Mazzini in his exile BtUl imagined that a
people needed only to determine to be free in order to
be free, Cavour schemed for an alliance .which should
range a^inst the Austrian Emperor armed forces as
numerous and as disciplined as his own. It was mainly
with this object that Cavour plunged Sar- qitout-.
dinia into the Crimean War. He was not **'™"p°^-
without just causes of complaint against the Czar; but
the motive with which he sent the Sardinian troops to
Sebastopol was not that they might take vengeance on
Bussia, but that they might fight side by side with the
soldiers of England and France. That the war might
lead to complications still unforeseen' was no doubt a
possibility present to Cavour'e mind, and in that case it
248 HOBEBN EUEOFE. latut.
was no small tiling that Sardinia stood allied to the two
Western Powers ; but apart from these chances of the
future, Sardinia would have done ill to stand idle when
at any moment, as it seemed, Austria might pass from
armed neutrality into active concert with England and
France. Had Austria so drawn the sword against
Kussia whilst Piedmont stood inactive, the influence of
the "Western Powers must for some years to come have
been ranged on the side of Austria in the maintenance
of its Italian possessions, and Piedmont could at the
best have looked only to St. Petersburg for sympathy
or support, Cavour was not scrupulous in his choice of
means when the liberation of Italy was the end in view,
and the charge was made against him that in joining
the coalition against Russia be lightly entered into a
war in which Piedmont had no direct concern. But
reason and history absolve, and far more than absolve,
the Italian statesman. If the cause of European
equilibrium, for which England and France took up
arms, was a legitimate ground of war in the case
of these two Powers, it was not Ie.ss so in the case
of their ally ; while if the ulterior results rather than
the motive of a war are held to constitute its justifica-
tion, Cavour stands out as the one politician in Europe
whose aims in entering upon the Crimean War have
been fulfilled, not mocked, by events. He joined in
the struggle against Russia not in order to maintain
the Ottoman Empire, but to gain an ally in liberating
Italy. The Ottoman Empire has not been maintained;
the independence of Italy has been established, and
established by means of the alliance which Cavoar gained.
His Crimean policy is one of those excessively rare in-
stances of statesmanship where action has been deter-
mined not by the driving and half-understood necessi-
ties of the monient, bat by a distinct and trae perception
of the fdture. He looked only in one direction, but in
that direction he saw clearly. Other statesmen struck
blindfold, or in their vision of a regenerated Turkey
fought for an empire of mirage. Tt may with some
reason be asked whether the order of Eastern Europe
would now be different if oar own English soldiers who
fell at Balaclava had been allowed to die in their beds :
every Italian whom Cavour sent to perish on the Tcher-
naya or in the cholera-stricken camp died as directly for
the cause of Italian independence as if he had fallen on
the slopes of Custozza or under the walls of Rome.
At the Conference of Paris in 1856 the Sardinian
Premier took his place in right of alliance by the side of
the representatives of the great Powers ; and when the
main business of the Conference was concluded, Count
Buol, the Austrian Minister, was forced to
listen to a vigorous denunciation bv Cavour conter-ince of
° _ •' _ Parii.
of the misgovernment that rtii^ned in Cen-
tral and Southern Italy, and of the Austrian occupation
which rendered this possible. Though the Prench were
still in Borne, their presence might by courtesy be
described as a measure of precaution rendered necessary
by the intrusion of the Austrians farther north ; and
both the French and English plenipotentiaries at the
Conference supported Cavour in his invective. Cavour
250 MODERN EUBOPB. WUk
retnmed to Italy without any territorial reward for the
BerviceB that Piedmont had rendered to the Allies ; but
his object was attained. He had exhibited Austria
isolated and discredited before Europe ; be had given
to his country a voice that it had never before had in
the Councils of the Powers ; he had produced a deep
conviction throughout Italy that Piedmont not only
could and would aot with vigour against the national
enemy, but that in its action it would have the help of
allies. From this time the Republican and Mazzinian
societies lost ground before the growing confidence in
the House of Savoy, in its Minister and its army.* The
strongest evidence of the effect of Cavour's Crimean
policy and of his presence at the Conference of Paris
was seen in the action of the Austrian
Ateo^oiio,. Government itself Prom 1849 to 1856
1808.
its rule in Northern Italy had been one not
BO much of severity as of brutal violence. Now all was
changed. The Emperor came to Milan to proclaim a
general amnesty and to win the aflection of his subjects.
The sequestrated estsites were restored to their owners.
- Badetzky, in his ninety-second year, was at length
' allowed to pass into retirement; the government of the
sword was declared at an end ; Maiimilian, the gentlest
and most winning of the Hapsbui^s, was sent with his
young bride to charm away the sad memories of the
evil time. But it was too late. The recognition shown
• C»TOiir, Lett«re (Chial»). ii introd. p. 187. Goenoni. Ctaribaldi, i.
412. Uimin, the Ez-Fresident of Teuice, now in exile, declftredfrtmi thii
time for the House of 89707. Garibaldi did the sanui
I i,z<..t,CoogIf
by the Lombarcis of the Emperor's own personal friend-
liness indicated no reconciliation with Austria; and
while Francis Joseph was still in Milan, King Victor
£minanuel, in the presence of a Lomhard deputation,
laid tlie first stone of the monument erected by subscrip-
tions front all Italy in memory of those who had fallen
in the campaigns of 1848 and 1849, the statue of a
foot-soldier waving Ins sword towards the Austrian
frontier. The Sardinian Press redoubled its attacks on
Austria and its Italian vassals. The Government of
Vienna sought satisfaction; Cavour sharply refused it;
and diplomatic relations between the two Courts, which
had been resumed since the Conference of Paris, were
again broken off.
Of the two Western Powers, Cavour would have
preferred an alliance with Great Britain, which had no
objects of its own to seek in Italy ; but when he found
that the Government of London would not c.T<raT»nd
assist him by arms gainst Austria, he drew ^'P"""""
closer to the Emperor Napoleon, and supported him
throughout his controversy with England and Austria
on the settlement of the Danubian Principalities.
Napoleon, there is no doubt, felt a real interest in Italy.
His own early political theories formed on a study
of the Napoleonic Empire, his youthful alliance with
the Carbonari, point to a synipatliy with the Italian
national cause which was genuine if not profound, and
which was not altogether lost in 1849, though France
then acted as the enemy of Koman independence. If
Napoleon intended to remould the Continental order
262 UODBEir EUBOPS. *•»«.
and the Treaties o( 1815 in the interests of France
and of the principle of nationality, he could make
no better beginning than by driving Austria from
Northern Italy. It was not eren necessary for him to
devise an original policy. Early in 1843, when it
seemed probable that Piedmont would be increased by
liOrabardy and part of Vonetia, Laraartine had laid it
down that Prance ought in that case to be compensated by
Savoy, in order to secure its frontiers against so power-
ful a neighbour as the new Italian State. To this idea
Napoleon returned. Savoy had been incorporated vrith
France from 1792 to 1814; its people were more
French than Italian ; its annexation would not directly
injure the interests of any great Power. Of the three
directions in which France might stretch towards ita
old limits of the Alps and the Ehine, the direction of
Savoy was by far the least dangerous. Belgium could
not be touched, without certain loss of the English
alliance, with which Napoleon could not yet dispense ;
an attack upon the Rhenish Provinces would probably
be met by all the Geruian Powers together ; in Savoy
alone was there the chance of gaining territory without
raising a European coalition against France. No sooner
had the organisation of the Danubian Principalities
been completed by the Conference which met in the spring
of 1858 than Napoleon began to develop his Italian
plans. An attempt of a very terrible character which
was made upon his life by Orsini, a Boman eiile,
though at the moment it threatened to embroil Sar-
■nw with France, probably stimnhited him to action.
ta«& OA70UB Aim KAFOLBON AT PLOUBISBEB. 363
In the summer of 1858 he invited Cavour to meet him
at Plombi^res. The negotiations which there passed
were not made known by the Emperor to
his Ministers; ther were communicated i^fnohjSni,
' •' Jnlj, tats.
by Cavour to two persons only besides
Victor Emmanuel. It seems that no written engage-
ment was drawn up ; it was verbally agreed that if
Piedmont could, without making a revolutionary war,
and without exposing Napoleon to the charge of aggres-
Bion, incite Austria to hostilities, France would act as
its ally. Austria was then to be expelled from Yenetia
as well aa from Lombardy. Victor Emmanuel was
to become sovereign of North-Italy, with the Eoman
Legations and Marches ; the remainder of the Papal
territory, except Rome itself and the adjacent dis-
trict, was to be added to Tuscany, so constituting a
new kingdom of Central Italy. Tbe two kingdoms,
together with Naples and Rome, were to form an
Italian Confederation under tbe presidency of the Po|>e.
Fiance was to receive Savoy and possibly Nice. A
marriage between the King's young daughter Clotilde
and the Emperor's cousin Prince Jerome Napoleon was
discussed, if not actually settled.*
^ From this moment Cavour laboured night and day
for war. His position was an exceedingly
difficult one. Not only had he to reckon or ibe Frsuch
with the irresolution of Napoleon, and his
avowed unwillingness to take up arms unless with
• CsTDDT, Letteie (Chialn), li intr. 289, 324; iiL intr. 1. Biniiclit,
I}ip]aiiiazia,Tii.l. HuiMle, CftTooTrji. 187. UMBui, lift MivmDra, p. ^
254 MOBBRN BUROFB. ibw-5>.
the appearance of some good cause ; but even supposing
the goal of war reached, uid Austria defeated, how little
was there in common between Cavour's aims for Italy
and the traditional policy of France I The first Napo-
leon had given "Venice to Austria at Campo Pormio ;
even if the new Napoleon should fulfil his promise and
liberate all Northern Italy, his policy in regard to the
centre and south of the Peninsula would probably be
antagonistic to any effective union or to any further
extension of the influence of the House of Savoy.
Garoor bad therefore to set in readiness for action
national forces of such strength that Napoleon, even if
he desired to draw back, should find it difficult to do
BO, and that the shaping of the future of the Italian
people should be governed not by the schemes which
the Emperor might devise at Paris, but by the claims
and the aspirations of Italy itself. It was necessary ,
for him not only to encourage and subsidise the !
National Society — a secret association whose branches in
the other Italian States were preparing to assist Pied-
mont in the coming war, and to unite Italy under
the House of Savoy — but to enter into communica-
tion with some of the Eepublican or revolutionaiy
party who had hitherto been at enmity with all
Crowns alike. He summoned Garibaldi in secrecy
to Turin, and there convinced him that the war about
to be waged by Yictor Emmanuel was one in which
he ought to take a prominent pari As the fore-
most defender of the Roman Republic and a revolu-
tionary hero, Garibaldi was obnoxious to the JVeuoh
Emperor. Cavoar had to conceal ^m Napoleon the
fact that Garibaldi would take the field at the head of a
free-corps by the side oC the Allied armies; he had
similarly to conceal from. Oaribaldi that one reault of
the war would be the cession of Nice, his own birth-
place, to France. Thus plunged in intrigae, driving
his Savoyards to the camp and raising from them the
last fartting in taxation, in order that after victory
they might be surrendered to a Foreign Power; goading
Austria to some act of passion ; inciting, yet checking
and controlling, the Italian revolutionary elements ; bar-
gaining away the daughter of his sovereign to one of
the most odious of mankind, Cavour staked all on the
one great end of his being, the establishment of Italian
independence. Words like those which burst from
Danton in the storms of the Convention — " Perish my
name, my reputation, so that France be free " — were
the calm and habitual expression of Cavour's thought
when none but an intimate friend was by to hear.*
Such tasks as Cavour's are not to be achieved with-
out means which, to a man noble in view an Cavour
really was, it would have heen more agreeable to leave
unemployed. Those alone are entitled to pronounce
judgment upon him who have made a nation, and
made it with purer hands. It was well for English
B^tesmen and philanthropists, inheritors of a world-
wide empire, to enforce the ethics of peace and to
* " la mezio ftlle piu uigroeimwe raiBi politiclie, esolAmiiTA neUe aoli-
tndine delle sne stauze ; ' Feriaca il mio nome, perisca Is mia f atna, pnrohb
I'ltilu sik.' " Artom (C»T(mr> «ecretu7), Cktoot iu P»rlameato : uitro4.
p.46. I
«S» KOPEBN EUEOPB. MM
plead for a gentlemanlike frankness and self-restraint
in the conduct of international relations. English
women had not been flogged by Austrian soldiers in
the market-place; the treaties of 1815 had not conee-
crated a foreign rule over half our race. To Cavour the
greatest crime would have been to leave anything
undone which might minister to Italy's liberation.*
Napoleon seems to have considered that he would
be ready to begin war in the spring of 1859. At the
.p,^^^ reception at the Tuileries on the 1st of
jmiuuj.iBw. January he addressed the Austrian ambas-
sador in words that pointed to an approaching conflict ;
a few weeks later a marriage-contract was sigued betweeo
Prince Napoleon and Clotilde daughter of Victor
Emmanuel, and part of the agreement made at Plom-
bieres was embodied in a furnial Treaty. Napoleon
undertook to support Sardinia in a war that might
arise from any ^^esslve act on the part of Austria,
and, if victorious, to add both Lombardy and Venetia
to Victor Emmanael's dominions. I France was in
return to receive Savoy, the disposal of Nice being
reserved till the restoration of peace.f Even before the
Treaty was signed Victor Emmanuel had thrown down
the challenge to Austria, declaring at the opening of
the Parliament of Turin that he could not be insen-
sible to the cry of suffering that rose from Italy. In
* La Faruw Epistokrio, ii. 56, 81, 137, 426. The interview with
Qsribaldi; Cavoiir, Lettere, id. iatrod. 297. Giribaldi, Epiatolario. 1 55.
t Cavour, Lett«re (Cbiala), iii. introd. 32. Bianchi, Diplomada, Tiii.
11. The statement of Napolson m. to Lord Oowle^, in Jlartin, Frincfl
Qonsort, T, 31, tiutt there wu no Treaty, is untma.
im. ATTSMPTB -iT SfSDlATION. 25?
all bnt technical form the imminence of war had been
announced, when, under the influence of diplomatists
and Ministers about him, and of a financial panic
that followed his address to the Austrian ambas-
sador, the irresolute mind of Napoleon shrank from its
purpose, and months more of suspense were imposed
upon Italy and Europe, to be terminated at last not by
any effort of Napoleon's will but by the rash and im-
politic action of Austria itself. At the in-
stance of the Court of Vienna the British "n"^*"-
GoTemment had consented to take steps towards media-
tion. Lord Cowley, Ambassador at Paris, was sent to
Vienna with proposals which, it was believed, might
form the basis for an amicable settlement of Italian
affairs. He asked that the Papal States should be
evacuated by both Austrian and French troops; that
Austria should abandon the Treaties which gave it a
"virtual Protectorate over Modena and Parma ; and
that it should consent to the introduction of reforms in
all the Italian Grovemmenta. Negotiations towards
this end had made some progress when they were inter-
rupted by a proposal sent from St. Petersburg, at the
. instance of Napoleon, that Italian affairs should be sub<
mitted to a European Congress. Austria was willing
under certain conditions to take part in a Congress,
bnt it required, as a preliminary measure, that Sardinia
should disarm. Napoleon had now learnt that Garibaldi
was to fight at the head of the volunteers for Victor Era-
manueL His doubts as to the wisdom of his own policy
seem to have ini^eased hoar by hour; from Britain, whose
258 llonESSr EUBOPS. I nsi
friendship he still considered indispensahle to him, he
received the most urgent appeals against war ; it was ne-
cessary that Cavonr himself Bbould visit Paris in order
to prevent the Emperor from acquiescing in Austria's
demand. In Cavour's presence Napoleon seems to have
lost some of his fears, or to have heen made to feel that
it was not safe to provoke his confidant of Flombi^resj*
bat Cavour had not long left Paris when a proposal
was made from London, that in lieu of the separate
disarmament of Sardinia the Powers should agree to a
general disarmament, the details to be settled by a
European Commission. This proposal received Napo-
leon's assent. He telegraphed to Cavour desiring him to
join in the agreement. Cavour could scarcely disobey, yet
at one stroke it seemed that all his hopes when on the
very verge of fulfilment were dashed to the ground, all
his boundless efforts for the liberation of Italy through
war with Austria lost and thrown away. For some
hours he appeared shattered by tha blow. Strung to
the extreme point of hnmaa endurance by labour
scarcely remitted by day' or night for weeks together,
his strong but sanguine nature gave way, and for a
while the few Friends who saw him feared that he would
take his own life. But the crisis passed: Cavour ac-
cepted, as inevitable, the condition of general disarma-
ment; and his vigorous mind had already began to
work upon new plans for the future, when the report of
* Bianohi, Folitiqne de Cmyaor, p. 328, where is OkTonr's ladignajit
letter to NftpoleoD. Tlie Uat parajfraph of this seems to oonrej * veiled
thrut to pubUsh the soeret uegotutioiu,
D, = ,l,z..tvG00gIf
im. WAR BETWEEN FRANOB AM) AUSTBlt. 269
a decision made at YienDa, which was sooa confirmed
by the arrival of an Austrian ultimatum, . ^ ,^
threw him into joy as intense as his previous »»'«n>.Apfi*«'
despair. Ignoring the British proposal for a general dis-
armament, already accepted at Turin, the Austrian Cahi-
net demanded, without qualifications and under threat of
war within three days, that Sardinia shoald separately
disarm. It was helieved at Vienna that Napoleon was
merely seeking to gain time; that a conflict was in-
evitable; and that Austria now stood better prepared
for immediate action than its enemies. Bight or wrong
in its judgment of Kapoleon's real intentions, the Aus-
trian Government had undeniably taken upon itself the
part of the aggressor. Cavour had only to point to his
own acceptance of the plan of a general disarnjament,
and to throw upon his enemy the responsibility for a
disturbance of European peace. His reply was taken
as the signal for hostilities, and on the 29th of April
Austrian troops crossed the Ticino. A declaration of
war from Paris followed without delay.*
For months past Austria had been pouring its
troops into Northern Italy. It had chosen its own
time for the commencement of war; a feeble c,^,-,^^^
enemy stood before it; its more powerful ^■
adversary could not reach the field without crossing the
Alps or the mountain-range above Genoa. Everything
pointed to a vigorous ofiensive on the part of the
* OaTonr, Lettere, iiL introd. p. 116 ; iU. 29. BUncihi, Politiqiie de
Catout, p. 333. Bianohi, DipIomAda, viL 6L Uanari, OsTonr, p. 314.
Parli&mentATj Fapen, 1859, xziii. SfH, 262. U^rimee, LettrM k Ptmizu,
L2I. Hftrtin, Prmea CcnaorL IT. 427. ,. ,
Mi ■ .....Coogic
M) ^DEBtr SVROPa. urn.
Austrian generals, and in Piedmont itself it was believed
that Turin must fall before French troops could assist
in its defence. From Turin as a centre the Austrians
could then strike with ease, and with superior numbers,
against the detachments of the French army as they
descended the mountains at any points in the semi-
circle from Genoa to Mont Cenis. There has seldom
been a case where the necessity and the advantages of a
particular line of strategy have been so obvious j yet
after crossing the Ticino the Austrians, above a hundred
thousand strong, stood as if spell-bound under their
incompetent chief, Giulay. Meanwhile French detach-
ments crossed Mont Cenis; others, more numerous,
landed with tlie Emperor at Genoa, and established
communications with the Piedaiontese, whose head-
quarters were at Alessandria. Giulay now believed
that the Allies would strike upon his comnuinicatioDB
in the direction o£ Parma. The march of Bonaparte
upon Piaccnza in 1790, as well as the campaign of
Marengo, might well inspire this fear; but the real in-
tention of Napoleon III. was to outflank the Austrians
from the nui-th and so to gain Milan. Garibaldi was
already op<'ratiiig at the extreme left of the Sardinian
line in the neighbourhood of Como. White the Pied-
montese maititained their positions in the front, the
French from Genoa nuirched northwards behind them,
crossed the Po, and reached Vercelli before the Aus-
trians discovered their mana'uvre. Giulay, still linger-
ing between the Scsia and the Ticino, now called up part
of his forces northwards, but not in time to prevent the
wm. UAaSNTA. 261
Piedmontese from crossing the Sesia and defeating the
troops opposed to them at Falestro (May 30). While
the Aastrians were occupied at this point, the French
crossed the river farther north, and moved eastwards on
the Ticino. Qiulay was thus outOanked and compelled
to Ml back. The Allies followed him, and on the 4th
of June attacked the Anstriau army in its positions
about Magenta on the road to Milan. The a-ssault of
Macmahon from the north gave the Allies
victory after a hard-fought day. It was
impossible for the Austrians to defend Milan ; they
retired upon the Adda and subsequently upon the
Minoio, abandoning all Lombardy to the invaders, and
calling up their troops from Bologna and the other
occupied towns in the Papal States, in order that they
might take part in the defence of the Venetian frontier
and the fortresses that guarded it.
The victory of the Allies was at once felt through-
out Central Italy. The Grand Duke of Tuscany had
already fled from his dominions, and the Dictatorship
for the period of the war had been offered by a Pro-
visional Government to Victor Emmanuel, who, while
refusing this, had allowed his envoy, Boncampagni, to
assume temporary powers at Florence as his representa-
five. The Duke of Modena and the Duchess of Parma
now qnitted their territories. In the Komagna the
disappearance of the Austrians resulted in
the immediate overthrow of Papal authority. '^*^ "*■
Everywhere the demand was for union with Piedmont.
The calamities of the last ten years had taught thei^
aa MODERIT BUROPB. im
kssoD to the Italian people. There was now nothing
of the disorder, the eztrav^ance, the childishness of
1843. The popolations who had then been so divided,
so SQSpidoDs, 80 easy a prey to demagogues, were now
watchfnl, self-controlled, and aniions for the guidance
oi the only real national Government. As at Florence,
so in the Duchies and in the Bomagna, it was desired
that Victor Enunanoel should assume the Dictatorship.
Tbe King adhered to the policy which he had adopted
towards Tuscany, avoiding any engagement that might
compromise him with Europe or his ally, but appointing
Commissioners to enrol troops for the common war
against Austria and to conduct the necessary work of
administration in these districts. Farini, the historian of
the Homan States, was sent to Modena ; Azeglio, the
ex-Minister, to Bolc^a. Each of these officers entered
on his task in a spirit worthy of th^ time ; each nnder-
Btood how much might be won for Italy by boldness,
how much endangered or lost by untimely scruples.*
In his proclamations at the opening of the war
Napoleon had declared that Italy must be freed up to
the shore of the Adriatic. His address to the Italian
people on entering Milan with Victor Emmanuel after
the victory of Magenta breathed the same spirit. As
yet, however, Lombardy alone bad been won. The
advance of the allied armies was accordingly resumed
after an interval of some days, and on the 23rd of June
they approached the positions held by the Austrians s
SOl.'iTa ^'^'^ ^P«t<»l"ri«. ii 172. PwliMientMy Papaw, 18t», zziB.
D,a,l,zc.bvG00gIe
little to the west of tlie MiDcio. Francis Joseph had
come from Vienna to take command of the army. His
presence assisted the enemy, inasmach as he had no plan
of his own, and wavered from day to day between the
antagonistic plans of the generals at headquarters.
Some wished to make the Mincio the line
of defence, others to hold the Chiese some '"'"■'"~"-
miles farther west. The consequence was that the
anny marched backwards and forwards across the space
between the two rivers according as one or another
general gained for the moment the Emperor's confi-
dence. It was while the Anstrians were thus engaged
that the allied mmies came into contact with them
about Solferino. On neither side was it known that the
whole force of the enemy was close at hand. The battle
of Solferino, one of the bloodiest of recent times, was
fongbt almost by accident. About a hundred and fifty
thousand men were present under Kapoleon and Victor
iEmmanuel ; the Anstrians had a slight superiority in
force. On the north, where Benedek with the Austrian
right was attacked by the Fiedmontese at San Martino,
it seemed as if the task imposed on the Italian troops
was beyond their power. Victor Emmanuel, fighting
with the same course as at Novara, saw the positions
in front of his troops alternately won and lost. But
the success of the French at Solferino in the centre
decided the day, and the Austrians withdrew at last
from their whole line with a loss in killed and wounded
of fourteen thousand men. On the part of the Allies
the slaughter was scarcely less. Cnnol •
AM MODB^T EVBOPS. HK
Napoleon stood a oonqneror, bnt a conqueror at
terrible cost; and in front of him he saw the fortresses
of the Quadrilateral, while new divisions were hastening
from the north and east to the support of the still
^^^ unbroken Austrian army. He might well
''*^^- doubt whether, even against his present
ant^onist alone, farther success was possible. The
fearful spectade of Solferino, heightened by the effects
of overpowering summer heat, probably affected a mind
humane and sensitive and untried in the experience of
war. The conditiou of the French army, there is
reason to believe, was far different from that represented
in official reports, and likely to make the continuance of
the campaign perilous in tlie extreme. But beyond all
this, the Emperor knew that if he advanced farther
Prussia and all Gemiaoy might at any moment take
up arms against him. There had been a strong out-
burst of sympathy for Austria in the south-western
German States. National patriotism was excited by
the attack of Napoleon on the chief of the German
sovereigns, and the belief was widely spread that French
conquest in Italy would soon be followed by French
conquest on the Khine. Prussia had hitherto shown
reserve. It would have joined its arms with those of
Austria if its own claims to an improved position in
Germany had been granted by the Court of Vienna ;
hut Francis Joseph had up to this time refused the
concessions demanded. In the stress of his peril he
might at any moment close with the offers which he
had before rejected; even without a distinct agree-
MIL YILLAFSANOA. S65
meot between the two Courts, and in mere deference to
German public opinion, Prussia might launch against
France the armies which it had already brought into
readiness for the field. A war upon the Bhine would
then be added to the war before the Quadrilateral, and
from the risks of this double effort Napoleon might welt
shrink in the interest of France not less than of his
own dynasty. He determined to seek an interview
with Francis Joseph, and to ascertain on what terms
peace might now be made. The interview took place
at Yillafranca, east of the Miucio, on the
llth of July. Francis Joseph refused to vuiufnum^
cede any part of Venetia without a further
struggle. He was willing to give up Lombardy, and
to coQseot to the establishment of an Italian Federation
under the presidency of the Pope, of which Federation
Yenetia, still under Austria's rule, should be a member ;
but he required that Mantua should be left withio his own
frontier, and that the sovereigns of Tuscany and Modena
should resume possession of their dorainioos. To these
terms Napoleon assented, on obtaining a verbal agree-
ment that the dispossessed princes should not be restored
by foreign arms. Begarding Parma and the restoration
of the Papal authority in the Bomagna no stipulations
were made. With the signature of the „
° PdBcs or VllU-
Preliminaries of Villafranca, which were to '"™^
form the base of a regular Treaty to be negotiated at
Zurich, and to which Victor Emmanuel added his
name with words of reservation, hostilities came to a close.
The uegotiations at Ziirich, though they lasted for
266 3I0DEB1T BTTBOPS. vm.
BeTeral months, added nothing of importance to the
matter of the Preliminaries, and decided
nothing that had heen left in uncertainty. ^""^ ^"- *"•
The Italian Federation remained a scheme which the
two Emperors, and they alone, nndertook to promote.
Piedmont entered into no engagement either with
regard to the Duchies or with regard to Federation.
Victor Emmanael had in fact announced from the first
that he would enter no League of which a province
governed by Austria formed a part, and from this
resolution he never swerved.*
Though Lombardy was gained, the impression made
upon the Italians by the Peace of Yillafranca was one
of the utmost dismay. Napoleon had so confidently and
H«hmBH.Mi rf ^'^ recently promised the liberation of all
a«rar. Northern Italy that public opinion ascribed
to treachery or weakness what was in truth an act of
political necessity. On the first rumour of the nego-
tiations Cavour had hurried from Turin, but the agree-
meut was Bigned before his arrival. The anger and
the grief of Cavour ace described by those who then
saw him as terrible to witness.f Napoleon had not
the courage to face him; Victor Emmanuel bore for
two hours the reproaches of his Minister, who
had now completely lost his self-control. Cavouj re-
turned to Turin, and shortly afterwards withdrew from
* Oavoor, Lettere iii. iutrod. 212, iiL 107. BUnohi, Folifiqiie de OftTonr,
p. 34S. BianoM, Biplomadft, Tiii. 145, 198. Massari, Yittorio Eiiuuiael«
iLS2. Kossuth, Memoriea, p. 394. Pari. Pap 1859, mii. 63, 1860, IxTia.
7. La Fuina E|nat, ii. 190. Ollivier, L'^gliae et I'^Ut, ii 452,
t Arrivobeae, Ittlj Tinder Victor Emnnmnn^ I, 268,
.OOglf
MHL CENTRAL ITALY. 267
office, tis last act being the despatch of ten thoosand
mnskets to Farini at Modena. In accordance with the
terms of peace, ingtmctious, which were probably not
meant to be obeyed, were sent by Cavour's successor,
Battazzi, to the Fiedmontese GommisgioDers in Central
Italy, bidding them to return to Turin and to
disband any forces that they had collected.
Farini, on receipt of this order, adroitly divested him-
self of his Fiedmontese citizenship, and, as an honorary
bnrglier of Modena, accepted the Dictatorship from his
fellow-townsmen. Azeglio returned to Turin, but took
care before quitting the Somagna to place four thou-
sand soldiers nnder competent leaders in a position to
resist attack. It was not the least of Cavour's merits
that he had gathered abont him a body of men who,
when his own hand was for a while withdrawn, could
pursue bis policy with bo mnch energy and sagaciiy as
' was now shown by the leaders of the national movement
in Central Italy. Yenetia was lost for the present ;
but if Napoleon's promise was broken, districts which
he had f^ed or had not intended to liberate might be
nnited with the Italiui Kingdom. The Duke of Mo-
dena, with six thousand men who had remained true to
bim, lay on the Austrian frontier, and threatened to
march upon bis capital. Farini mined the city gates,
and armed so considerable a force that it became clear
that the Duke would not recover bis dominions withoat
a serions battle. Parma placed itself under the same
Dictatorship with Modena; in the Bomagna a Pro-
Tisional GoTenunent which Azeglio had left~ behind
268 MODX^r SVROPB, m<
him contmued bis work. Tuscany, where Napoleon
had hoped to find a throne for bis cousin, pronouDced
for national union, and organised a common military
force witb its neighbours. During the weeks that
followed tbe Peace of Villafranca, declarations signed by-
tens of thousauds, the votes of representative bodies,
and popular demonstrations throughout Ceotral Italy,
showed in an orderly and peaceful form how universal
was the desire for union under the House of Savoy.
Cavour, in the plans which he had made before
1869, bad not looked for a direct and imiaediate result
beyond the creation of an Italian Kingdom
brfoTB viiu. including the whole of tbe territory north
of tbe Po. Tbe other steps in the con-
solidation of Italy would, he believed, follow in
their order. They might be close at band, or they
might be delayed for a while ; but in the expulsion of
Austria, in tbe interposition of a purely Italian State
numbering above ten millions of inhabitants, mistress
of the fortresses and of a powerful fleet, between Aus-
tria and those who had been its vassals, tbe essential
conditions of Italian national independence would
have been won. For the rest, Italy might be content
to wait upon time and opportunity. But the Peace of
YiUafranca, leaving Venetia in the enemy's hands,
completely changed this prospect. Tbe fiction of an
Italian Federation in which the Hapsburg Emperor, as
lord of Venice, should forget bis Austrian interests and
play the part of Italian pL.triot, was too gross to
deceive any one, Italy, on these terms, would either
tm OBNTBAL ITALT. 2B9
oontinae to be governed from Vienna, or be made a
pawn in the hands of its French protector. What
therefore Cavour had hitherto been willing to leave to
fature years now became the need of the present.
" Before Villafranca," in his own words, " the union of
Italy was a possibility ; since Villafranca it is a neces-
sity-" Victor Emmanuel understood this _
too, and saw the need for action more 'il^'SiJr-
clearly than Battazzi and. the Ministers who,
on Cavour's withdrawal in July, stepped for a few
months into his place. The sitaation was one that
called indeed for no mean exercise of statesmanship. If
Italy was not to be left dependent upon the foreigner
and the reputation of the House of Savoy ruined, it
was necessary not only that the Duchies of Modena and
Parma, but that Central Italy, including Tuscany and
at least the Bomi^na, should be united with the Kingdom
of Piedmont; yet the accomplishment of this work
was attended with the utmost danger. Napoleon him-
self was hoping to form Tuscany, with an augmented
territory, into a rival Kingdom of Etruria or Central
Italy, and to place his cousin on its throne. The
Ultramontane party in Fmnce was alarmed and indig-
nant at the overthrow of the Pope's authority in the
Komagna, and already called upon the Emperor to
fulfil his duties towards the Holy See. If the national
movement should exteod to Bome itself, the hostile
intervention of Prance was almost inevitable. While
the negotiations with Austria at Ztirich were still pro-
ceeding, Victor Emmanuel could not safely accept the
870 MODEBJSr BUBOTS. uw
sovereignty that was offered him by Tuscany and the
neighbouring provinces, nor permit his cousin, the
Prince of Carignano, to assume the regency which,
during the period of suspense, it was proposed to
confer upon him. Above all it was necessary that the
Government should not allow the popular forces with
which it was co-operating to pass beyond its own con-
trol. In the critical period that followed the armistice
of Villafranca, Mazzini approached Victor Emmannel,
as thirty years before he had approached
aS^^i-' his father, and offered his own assistance
in the establishment of Italian union under
the House of Savoy. He proposed, as the first step,
to overthrow the Neapolitan Government by means of
an expedition headed by Garibaldi, and to unite Sicily
and Naples to the King's dominions ; but he demanded
in return that Piedmont should oppose armed resistance
to any foreign intervention occasioned by this enter-
prise; and he seems also to have required that an
attack should be made immediately afterwards upon
Rome and upon Venetia. To these conditions the
King could not accede ; and Mazzini, confirmed in his
attitude of distrust towards the Court of Turin, turned
to Garibaldi, who was now at Modena. At his instiga-
tion Garibaldi resolved to lead an expedition at once
against Rome itself. Napoleon was at this very
moment promising reforms on behalf of the Pope,
and warning Victor Emmanuel against the annexa-
tion even of the Romagna (Oct. 20th). At the risk
of incurring the hostility of Ghiribaldi's foUowera
UK THB PBOP08SD OOSTQREBB. 271
and throwing their leader into opposition to the
dynasty, it was necessary for the Sardinian Government
to check him in his course. The moment was a critical
one in the history of the House of Savoy. But the
soldier of Repahlican Italy proved more tractahle than
its prophet. Q-arihaldi was persuaded to abandon or post-
pone an enterprise which could only have resulted in
disaster for Italy; and with expressions of cordiality
towards the King himself, and of bitter contempt for the
fox-like politicians who advised him, he resigned his com-
mand and bade farewell to his comrades, recommending
them, however, to remain under arms, in full confidence
that they would ere long find a better opportunity for
carryiag the national flag southwards.*
Soon after the Agreement of Villafranca, Napoleon
had proposed to the British Government that a Con-
gress o£ all the Powers should assemble at Paris in
order to decide upon the many Italian questions which
still remained unsettled. In taking upon himself the
emancipation of Northern Italy Napoleon had, as it
proved, attempted a task far beyond his own powers.
The work had been abruptly broken off; the promised
services had not been rendered, the stipulated reward
had not been won. On the other hand,
Thepnipned
forces had been set in motion which he who c™e'™-
raised them could not allay ; populations stood in arms
against the Governments which the Agreement of
Villafranca purported to restore ; the Pope's authority
* Oavoor, Lett«», iii. iutrod. 301. Bianchi, Tiii. ISO. Garibaldi,
El^st., i 78. Gveraoni, I 491, BeacUiii, ir. 410.
8n UODEBN EOROPa. IM
in the northern part of Iiis dominions was at an end ;
the Italian League over which France and Austria were
to join hands of benediction remained the langbing-
stock of Europe. Napoleon's victories had added Lom-
bardy to Piedmont; for the rest, except from the
Italian point of view, they had only thrown affairs
into confusion. Hesitating at the first between
bis obligatioQS towards Austria and the maintenance
of his prestige in Italy, pei-plezed between the con-
tradictory claims of nationality and of Ultramon-
tanism, Napoleon would gladly have cast upon Great
Britain, or upon Europe at large, the task of extricating
him from his embarrassment. But the Cabinet of
London, while favourable to Italy, showed little inclina-
tion to entangle itself in engagements which might lead
to war with Austria and Germany in the interest of
the French Sovereign. Italian afEairs, it was ui^ed by
Lord John Russell, might well be governed by the
course of events within Italy itself; and, as Austria
remained inactive, the principle of non-intervention
really gained the day. The firm attitude of the popu-
lation both in the Duchies and in the Romagna,
their unanimity and self-control, the absence of those
disorders which had so often been made a pretext for
foreign intervention, told upon the mind of Napoleon
and on the opinion of Europe at large. Each month
that passed rendered the restoration of the fallen
Ooveroments a work of greater difficulty, and increased
the confidence of the Italians in themselves. Napoleon
watched and wavered. When the Treaty of Zurich was
un THB FOPB AND TEE OONQRESS. 273
Bigned bis policy vas still undetermiQed. By the
' prompt and liberal concessioa of reforms the Papal
Government might perhaps even now have turned the
balance in its favour. But the obstinate mind of
Pins IX. was proof against every politic and every gene-
rous influence. The stubbonmess shown by Borne, the
remembrance of Antonelli's conduct towards the French
Bepublic in 1849, possibly also the discovery of a
Treaty of Alliance between the Papal Government and
Austria, at length overcame Napoleon's hesitation in
meeting the national demand of Italy, and gave him
courage to defy both the Papal Court and the French
priesthood. He resolved to consent to the formation
of an Italian Kingdom under Victor Emmanuel iii-
cluding the northern part of the Papal territories as
well as Tuscany and the other Duchies, and to silence
the outcry which this act of spoliation would excite
among the clerical party in France by the annexation
of Nice and Savoy.
The decision of the Emperor was foreshadowed
by the publication on the 24th of December of
a pamphlet entitled " The Pope and
the Congress." The doctrine advanced oecong™-,"
in this essay was that, although a cer-
tain temporal authority was necessary to the Pope's
spiritoal independence, the peace and unity which
sbonld surround the Yicar of Christ would be best
attained when his temporal sovereignty was reduced
within the narrowrat possible limits. Bome and the
territory immediately around it, if guaranteed to the Pope
S - I COOJMC
274 MODEWf BUBOPS. ma.
by tbe Great Powers, wonid be sufficient for tbe temporal
needs of tbe Holy See. The revenue lost by the separa-
tion of tbe remaiuder of tbe Papal territories might be
replaced by a yearly tribute of reverence paid by the
Catholic Powers to the Head of the CJhurcb. That the
pamphlet advocating this policy was written at the dic-
tation of Napoleon was not made a secret. Its appear-
ance occasioned an indignant protest at Rome. The
Pope announced that he would take no part in the
proposed Congress unless the doctrines advanced in
the pamphlet were disavowed by the French Govern-
ment. Napoleon in reply submitted to the Pope that
he would do well to purchase the guarantee of the
Powers for the remainder of his territories by giving np
all claim to the Eomagna, which he had already lost.
Pius retorted that he could not cede what Heaven had
granted, not to himself, but to the Church; and that
if the Powers would but clear the Romagna of Pied-
nionteso intruders he would soon reconquer the rebellious
province without the assistance either of France or of
Austria. The attitude assumed by the Papal Court
giive Napoleon a good pretext for abandoning the plan
of a European Congress, from which he coutd hardly
g^^ofMi^ expect to obtain a grant of Nice and Savoy.
■"i-".?tS;. It was announced at Paris that the Con-
of Jan ^'^^^^ ^"^"^^ ^® postponed ; and on the 5th
"ary, i860, the change in Napoleon's policy was
^ST'JS™- Put'Jicly marked by the dismissal of bis
Po'itment in t^^'^^ Minister, Walewski, and the ap-
^ bis place of Thouvenel. a friend to Italiao
L ,i,z<,.f,GoogIf
MM CAYOVR AND NJPOLBON. 275
onion. Ten days later Rattazzi gave up office at Turin,
and Cavour returned to power.
Kattazzi, during the six months that he had cod-
dacted affairs, had steered safely past some dangerous
rocks; but he held the helm with an unsteady and
uubnsted hand, and he appears to have displayed an
unworthy jealousy towards Cavour, who, while out of
office, had not ceased to render what services he could to
Ms country. Cavour resumed his post, with the roiolve
to defer no longer the annexation of Central Italy, but
with the heavy consciousness that !N^apoleon would
demand in return for his consent to this
union the cession of Nice and Savoy, No J^p^^Lj,
Treaty entitled France to claim this reward,
for the Anstrians stlLl held Venetian but Napoleon's
troops lay at Milan, and by a march southwards they
could easily throw Italian affairs again into confusion,
and undo all that the last six months had effected.
Cavour would perhaps have lent himself to any
European combination which, while directed against
the extension of France, would have secured the ex-
istence of the Italian Kingdom ; but no such alterna-
tive to the French alliance proved possible; and the
subsequent negotiations between Paris and Turin were
intended only to vest with a certain diplomatic pro-
priety the now inevitable .transfer of territory from
the weaker to the stronger State. A series of propo-
sitions made from liondon with the view of with-
drawing from Italy both French and Austrian influence
led the Austrian Court to acknowledge that its army
s2
SE78 MOBESIT EVROPB. tm.
wodM not be employed for the restoration of the
sovereigns of Tuscany and Modena. Construing this
statement aa an admission that the stipulations of
Villafrauca and Zurich as to the return of the fugi-
tive princes had become impracticable, Napoleon
now suggested that Victor Emmanuel should annex
Parma and Modena, and assume secular power in the
Bomagna as Yicar of the Pope, leaving Tuscany to
form a separate Government. The establishment of so
powerful a kingdom on the confines of France was, he
added, not in accordance with the traditions of French
foreign policy, and in self-defence France must rectiiy
its military frontier by the acquisition of Nice and
Savoy (Feb. 24th}. Cavour well onderstood that the
mention of Tuscan independence, and the qualified
recognition of the Pope's rights in the Koroagna, were
no more than suggestions of the means of pressure by
which France might enforce the cessions it required.
He answered that, although Victor Emmanuel could
not alienate any part of his dominions, bis Govern-
ment recognised the same popular rights in Sayoy and
Nice as in Central Italy ; and accordingly that if the
population of these districts declared in a l^al form
their desire to be incorporated with France, the King
would not resist their will. Having thus consented to
the necessary sacrifice, and ignoring Napoleon's reserva-
tions with regard to Tuscany and the Pope, Cavonr gave
orders that a popular vote should at once be taken in
Tuscany, as well as in Parma, Modena, and the Bomagna,
on the question of union with Piedmont. .The. voting
»«. VmON OF OESTRAL ITALY WITS PJ3DU0NT. 277
took plfice early in March, and gave an OTerwhelming
majority in favoar of union. The Pope rntoDoia»
issued the major excommnDication against ^i^^>>wiib
the aathors, abettors, and agents in this ""^
work of sacrilege, and heaped cnrees on curses ; but no
one seemed the worse for them. Victor Emmanuel
accepted the sovereignty that was offered to him, and
on the 2nd of April the Parliament of the united
kingdom assembled at Turin. It had already been
annoonced to the inhabitants of Nice and Savoy that
the King had consented to their anion with France.
The formality of a plebiscite was enacted a few days
later, aud under the combined pressure of b,_,^„j„
the French and Sardinian Governments »"R««.
the desired results were obtained. Not more than a
few hundred persons protested by their vote against
a transaction to which it was understood that the King
had no choice but to submit.*
That Victor Emmanuel had at one time been di:;-
posed to resist Cavour's surrender of the home of
his race is well known. Above a year, however, had
passed since the project had been accepted
as the basis of the French alliance ; and if, «JiS'n "nuI
daring the interval of suspense after Villa-
franca, the King had cherished a hope that the sacrifice
might be avoided without prejudice either to the cause
of Italy or to his own relations with Napoleon, Cavour
• CsTonr, Leilero, W. introd. 20. Bianclii, Politiquo, p. 354.
Biknehi, DiplomuiA, TiiL 356. fEirluiiieutarj Fapcra, 1860, kvU. 203 (
278 MODE^f STTBOPB. msl
had entertatQed no such illosionB. He knew that the
cession was an indispensable link in the chain of his
own policy, that policy which had made it possible to
defeat Austria, and which, he believed; would lead to
the fuither consolidation of Italy. Looking to Borne,
to Falenno, where the smouldering fire might at any
moment blaze out, he could not yet dispense with the
friendship of Napoleon, he could not proToke the one
man powerful enough to shape the action of France in
defiance of Clerical and of Legitimist aims. Battazzi
might claim credit for having brought Piedmont past
the Treaty of Zurich without loss of territory ; Cavour.
in a far finer spirit, took upon himself the responsibility
for the sacrifice made to France, and bade tbe Parlia-
ment of Italy pass judgment upon his act. The
cession of the border-provinces overshadowed what would
otherwise have been the brightest scene in Italian
history for many generations, the meeting of tbe first
North-Italian Parliament at Turin. Garibaldi, coming
as deputy from his birthplace, Nice, uttered words of
scorn and injustice against the man who had made him
an alien in Italy, and quitted the Chamber. Bitterly
as Cavour felt, both now and down to the end of his
life, the reproaches that were levelled against him, he
allowed no trace of wounded feeling, of impatience, of
the sense of wrong, to escape him in the masterly speech
in which he justified his policy and won for it the rati-
fication of the Parliament. It was not until a year later,
when the hand of death was almost upon him, that
fierce words addressed to him face to face by Garibaldi
UMk OAVOUR AND aARIBAU}!. «9
wrung from him the impressive acswer, " The act that
has made this gulf between as was the most painful duty
of my life. By what I have felt myself I know what
G^aribaLdi must have felt. If he refuses me his foi^ive-
ness I cannot reproach him for it." *
The annexation of Nice and Savoy by Napoleon
was seen with extreme displeasure in Europe generally,
and most of all in England. It directly _^^^^^
affected the history of Britain by the ^^^
Btimulus which it gave to the development
of the Volunteer Forces. Owing their origin to certain
demonstrations of hostility towards England made by
the French army after Orsini's conspiracy and the
acquittal of one of his confederates in London, the Volun-
teer Forces rose in the three months that followed the
annexation of Nice and Savoy from seventy to a hundred
and eighty thousand men. If viewed as an indication
that the ruler of France would not be content with the
frontiers of 1815, the acquisition of the Sub-Alpine
provinces might with some reason excite alarm ; on no
other ground could their transfer be justly condemned.
Geographical position, language, commercial interests,
separated Savoy from Piedmont and connected it with
France ; and though in certain parts of the County of
Nice the Italian character predominated, this district as
a whole bore the stamp not of Piedmont or Liguria
but of Provence. Since the separation from France in
1815 there had always been, both in Nice and Savoy, a
considerable party which desired reunion with that
• CavoDi in FsrlaoientaL ft 55S. ,-. ,
280 MODERN EVBOPS. vak
country. The political and social order of tlie Sardiuiaa
Kingdom had from 1815 to 1848 been so backward, so re-
actionary, that the middle claEses in the border-proTinces
looked wistfully to France as a land where their own
grievanceB had been removed and their own ideals at-
taioed. The constitutional system of Victor Emmannel^
and the despotic system of Louis Napoleon had both been
too recentJy introduced to reverse in the minds of tbe
greater number the political tradition of the preceding
thirty years. Thus if there were a few who, like Glari-
baldi, himself of Genoese descent though bom at Nice,
passiooately resented separation irom Italy, they found
no considerable party either in Nice or in Savoy animated
by the same feeling. On the other hand, the ecclesias-
tical sentiment of Savoy rendered its transfer to France
an actual advantage to the Italian State. The Papacy
had here a deeply-rooted iiiHuonce. The reforms be-
gun by Azeglio's Ministry had been steadily resisted
by a Savoyard group of deputies in the interests
of Rome. Cavour himself, in the prosecution of his
larger plans, had always been exposed to the danger of
a Coalition between this ultra- Conservative party and
his opponents of the other extreme. It was well that
in the conflict with the Papacy, without which there
could be no such thing as a Kingdom of United Italy,
these influences of the Savoyard Church and Noblesse
should be removed from the Parliament and the Throne.
Honourable as the Savoyard party of resistance had
proved themselves in Parliamentary life, loyal and
faithful as they were to their sovereign, they were yet
not a part of the Italian nation. Their interests were
not bound up with the cause of Italian union ; their
leaders were not inspired with the ideal of Italian
national life. The forces that threatened the future of
the new State from within were too powerful for the
surrender of a priest-governed and half -foreign element
to he considered as a real loss.
!Nice and Savoy had hardly heen handed over to
Napoleon when Garibaldi set out from Genoa to effect
the liberation of Sicily and Naples. King
Ferdinand 11., known to his subjects and
to Western Europe as King Bomha, had died a few
days before the battle of Magenta, leaving the
throne to his son Francis II. In consequence of the
friendship shown by Ferdinand to Kussia during the
Crimean War, and of hie refusal to amend his tyran-
nical system of government, the Western Powers
had in 1856 wi th drawn their represen tati ves from
Naples. On the accession of Francis II. diplo-
matic intercourse was renewed, and Cavour, who had
been at bitter enmity with Ferdinand, sought to es-
tablish relations of friendship with his son. In the
war against Austria an alliance with Naples would
have been of value to Sardinia as a counterpoise to
Napoleon's influence, and this alliance Cavour attempted
to obtain. He was, however, unsuccessful j and after
the Peace of Villafranca the Neapolitan Court threw
itself with ardour into schemes for the restoration of
the fallen Governments and the overthrow of Pied-
montese authority in the Bomagna by means of a
as» KODBBS SUBOPS. nai
ecMilitioii with Austria and Spain and a connter-n-
Toltttaonaiy movement in Italy itself. A rising on
bebalTof the fiigitive Grand Duke of Tuscany was to give
the signal for the march of the Neapolitan army north-
wards. This rising, however, was expected in vain,
and the great Catholic design resulted in nothing.
Baffled in its larger aims, the Bourbon Gtoveroment
proposed in the spring of 1860 to occupy TJmbria and
the Marches, in order to prevent the revolutionary
movement from spreading farther into the Papal States.
Against this Cavour protested, and King Francis
yielded to his threat to withdraw the Sardinian am-
bassador from Naples. Knowing that a conspiracy
existed for the restoration of the House of Murat to
the Neapolitan throne, which would have given France
the ascendency in Southern Italy, Cavour now renewed
hi.s demand that Francis TL should enter into alliance
with Piedmont, accepting a constitutional system of
government and the national Italian policy of Victor
Emmanuel. But neither the summons from Turin, nor
the agitation of the Muratists. nor the warnings of
Great Britain that the Bourbon dynasty could only
avert its faU by reform, produced any real change in
spirit of the Neapolitan Court. Ministers were
removed but the absolutist and anti-national system
mmned the same. Meanwhile Garibaldi was gather-
AprU Vi f T' '''""'^ ^'"^ ^" *^^°°*- On the 15th of
less hia faUl"" , "^""^' ^"^te to King Francis that un-
«»« Piedmonr '^°*^^'*"*'-^ "*^ immediately abandoned
ntese Government itself might shortly be
forced to become the i^nt of his destraction. Even
thiB menace prored fruitless; and after thug fairlj
exposing to the Court of Naples the consequence of its
own stubboniQess, Victor Emmanuel let loose against it
the revolutionary forces of Garibaldi.
Since the campaign of 1859 insurrectionary com-
mittees had been active in the principal Sicilian towns.
The old desire of the Sicilian Liberals for the
independence of the island had given place,
under the influence of the events of the past year, to the
desire for Italian union. On the abandonment of Gari-
boldi'a plan for the march on Eome in November, 1859,
tbe liberation of Sicily had been su^ested to him as a
more feasible enterprise, and the general himself wavered
in the spring of 1860 between the resumption of his
Roman project and an attack upon the Bourbons of
Naples from the south. The rumour spread through
Sicily that Garibaldi would soon appear there at the head
of bis followers. On the 3rd of April an attempt at in-
surrection was made at Palermo. It was repressed without
difficulty ; and although disturbances broke out in other
parts of the island, the reports which reached Garibaldi
at Genoa as to the spirit and prospects of the Sicilians
were so disheartening that for a while he seemed dis-
posed to abandon the project of invasion as hopeless for
the present. It was only when some of the Sicilian
exiles declared that they would risk the Bu(h.iairf«i.
enterprise without him that he resolved upon '"^^- ^j^
immediate action. On the night of the 6th of May two
steamships lying in the huboor of Genoa were seized.
S84 ItOMBS SUROPM. mm
and on these Garibaldi with his Tbonsand pat to Bea.
Cavour, though he would have preferred that Sicily
should remain nnmolested until some progress had been
made in the consolidation of the North Italian King-
dom, did not Tentore to restrain Garihaldi's moTements,
with which he was well acquainted. He required,
however, that the expedition should not touch at the
island of Sardinia, and gave ostensible orders to his
admiral, Persano, to seize the ships of Garibaldi if
they should put into any Sardinian port. Garibaldi,
who had sheltered the Sardinian Government from
responsibility at the outset by the fiction of a sndden
capture of the two merchant-ships, continued to spare
Victor Emmanuel unnecessary difficulties by avoiding
the fleet which was supposed to be en the watch for
him off Cagliari in Sardinia, and only interrupted his
voyage by a landing at a desolate spot on the Tuscan
coast in order to take up artillery and ammunition
which were waiting for him there. On the 11th of
May, having heard from some English merchantmen
that there were no Neapolitan vessels of war at Marsala,
he made for this harbour. The first of his two ships
fluibaidirt entered it in safety and disembarked her
«.i«.ifl,M«j n, (jrg^. tiie second, running on a rock, lay
for some time witliin range of the guns of a Neapolitan
war-steamer which was bearing up towards the port.
But for some unknown reason the Neapolitan commander
delayed opening fire, and the landing of Garibaldi's fol-
lowers was during this interval completed without loss.*
* Ouibtldi, Ejiiat. i 87. Peisauo, Disrio, i U, La fMriiu,. ^^at.,
iMk OARIBALDI nr aiaHT. 285
Od the following day the little army, attired in the
red shirts which are worn bj cattle-ranchers ia South
America, marched eastwards from Marsala. Bands of
Tjllagers joined them as they moved through the
country, and many unexpected adherents were gained
among the priests. On the third day's march Neapoli-
tan troops were seen in position at Calatafimi. They
were attacked by Oaribaldi, and, though far superior ia
namber, were put to the rout. The moral effects of
this first victory were very great. The Neapolitan
commander retired into Palermo, leaving Garibaldi
master of the western portion of the island. Insur-
rection spread towards the interior; the revolutionary
party at Palermo itself regained its courage and pre-
pared to co-operate with Garibaldi on his approach.
On nearing tlie city Garibaldi determined that he could
not risk a direct assault upon the forces
which occupied it. He resolved, if possible, towEooSK
to lure part of the defenders into the moun-
tains, and during their absence to throw himself into
the city and to trust to the energy of its inhabitants
to maintain himself there. This strategy succeeded.
While the officer in command of some of the Neapoli-
tan battalions, tempted by an easy victory over the
ill-disciplined Sicilian bands opposed to him, pursued
his beaten enemy into the mountains, Garibaldi with
the best of his troops fought bis way into Palermo on
the night of May 26th. Fighting continued in the
H. SU. Oqohoiu. ii. 23. Farliamentacr Pttpers, 186a, Ixrin. 2. Hiindr,
HJIS. Smnibal ti Palermo, p. 133. mw\c
2M KODSmr SUBOPS. im.
streets dnnng the next two days, and the cannon of
the forts and of the Keapolitui vessels in harbour
ineffectoally bombarded the city. On the 30th, at the
moment when the absent battalions were coming again
into sight, an armistice was signed on board the British
man-of-war Hannibal. The Neapolitan commander
gave up to Garibaldi the bank and public buildings, and
withdrew into the forts outside the town. But the
Government at Naples was now becoming thoroughly
alarmed ; and considering Palermo as lost, it directed
the troops to be shipped to Messina and to Naples
itself. Garibaldi was thus left in undisputed possession
of the Sicilian capital. He remained there for nearly
two months, assuming the government of Sicily as
Dictator in the lume of Victor Emmanuel, appointing
Ministers, and levying taxes. Heavy reinforcements
reached him from Italy. The Neapolitans, driven irom
the interior as well as from the towns occupied by the
invader, now held only the north-eastern extremity of
the island. On the 20th of July Garibaldi, operating
both by land and sea, attacked and defeated them at
Milazzo on the northern coast. The result of this
victory was that Messina itself, with the exception of
the citadel, was evacuated by the Neapolitans with-
oat resistance. Garibaldi, whose troops now numbered
eighteen thousand, was master of the island from sea to
sea, and could with confidence look forward to the over-
throw of Bourbon authority on the Italian mainland.
During Garibaldi's stay at Palermo tlie ant^onism
between the two political creeds which severed those
m. OARIBJLDI. ItAZZim. OAVOXm. 287
whose devotion to Italy was the Btrongest came clearly
into view. This antagonisra stood embodied in its ex-
treme form in the contrast between Maz- mrM***
zini and Cavour. Mazzini, handling moral
and political conceptions with something of the inde-
pendence of a mathematician, laid it down as tbe first
duty of the Italian nation to possess itself of Rome
and Tenice, regardless of difficulties that might be
raised from without. By conviction he desired that
Italy should be a Republic, though under certain con-
ditions he might be willing to tolerate the monarchy of
Victor Emmanuel. Cavouj, accurately observing the
play of political forces in Europe, conscious above all of
the strength of those ties which still bound Napoleon
to the clerical cause, knew that there were limits which
Italy could not at present pass without ruin. The
ceotrc of Mazzini's hopes, an advance upon Home
itself, he knew to be an act of self-destruction for Italy,
and this advance he was resolved at all costs to prevent.
Cavour' had not hindered the expedition to Sicily ; ho
had not considered it likely to embroil Italy witti its
ally ; but neither had he been the author of this enter-
prise. The liberation of Sicily might be deemed the
work rather of the school of Mazzini than of Cavour.
Garibaldi indeed was personally loyal to Victor Em-
manuel; but around him there were men who, if not
Republicans, were at least disposed to make the grant
of Sicily to Victor Emmanuel conditional upon the
king's fulftlling the will of the so-called Party of Action,
and consenting to an attack upon Borne. Under the
888 MODSSS BUSOPS. laak
inflaence of these politicians Ghiribaldi, in reply to a depu-
tation expressing to him the desire of the Sicilians for
union with the Kingdom of Victor Emmanuel, declared
that he had come to fight not for Sicily alone hut for all
Italy, and that if the annexation of Sicily was to take
place before the union of Italy was assured, he most
withdraw his hand from the work and retire. The effect
produced by these words of Garibaldi was so serious
that the Ministers whom be had placed in office resigned.
Garibaldi endeavoured to substitute for tbem men more
agreeable to the Party of Action, but a demonstration in
Palermo itself forced him to nominate Sicilians in iavour
of immediate annexation. The public opinion of the
island was hostile to Bepublicanism and to the friends
of Mazzini ; nor could the prevailing anarchy long
continue without danger of a reactionary movement.
Garibaldi himself possessed no glimmer of administra-
tive faculty. After weeks of confusion and misgovem-
ment he saw the necessity of accepting direction from
Turin, and consented to recognise as Pro-Dictator of
the island a nominee of Cavour, the Fiedmontese
Depretis. Under the influence of Depretis a commence-
ment was made in the work of political and social
reorgani sation. *
Cavour, during Garibaldi's preparation for bis descent
upon Sicily and until the capture of Palermo, had
aflected to disavow and condemn the enterprise as one
undertaken by individuals in spite of the Government,
" CftTonr, Lettere, iii. introd. 269. Lk Farina, Epiat, iL 336. Kandi,
Po1iti<]ne, p. S66. Fenano, Diario, i M, 72, 96.
I i,z<..t,CoogIc
UM SAFLEB. 88B
and at tbeir own risk. The Piedmontese ambassador
was still at Naples as the representative of a friendly
Court ; and in reply to the reproaches of
Qenoany and Bassia, Cayour alleged that wi^ng«dM
the title of Dictator of Sicily in the name
of Victor Emmanuel had been assumed by Garibaldi
■without the knowledge or consent of bis sovereign.
Bttt whatever might be said to Foreign Powers, Cavour,
from the time of the capture of Palermo, recognised
that the hoar had come for further steps towards Italian
onion ; and, without committing himself to any definite
line of action, he began already to contemplate the
overthrow of the Bourbon dynasty at Naples. It was
in vain that Xing Francis now released his political
prisoners, declared the Constitution of 1848 in force,
and tendered to Piedmont the alliance which he had
before refused, Cavour, in reply to his overtures,
stated that he could not on his own authority pledge
Piedmont to the support of a dynasty now almost in
the agonies of dissolution, and that the matter must
await the meeting of Parliament at Turin. Thus
far the way had not been absolutely closed to a recon-
ciliation between the two Courts; but after the
victory of Garibaldi at Milazzo and the evacuation
of Messina at the end of July Cavour cast aside all
besitation and reserve. He appears to have thought
a renewal of the war with Austria probable, and
now strained every nerve to become master of Naples
and its fleet before Austria could take the field. He
ordered Admiral Fersano to leave two ihips of war to
290 MODEBiT BtmOPE. mm.
cover Garibaldi's pass^e to the maioland, and with
one ship to proceed to Naples himself, and there excite
insorrection and win over the Neapolitan fleet to the
flag of Victor Emmanuel. Fersano reached Naples on
the 3rd of August, and on the next day the
broken off. On the 19th Garibaldi crossed,
from Sicily to the mainland. His march upon the
capital was one unbroken triumph.
It was the hope of Cavour that before Garibaldi
could reach Naples a popular movement in the city
itself would force the King to take flight, so that
Garibaldi on his arrival would find the machinery of
government, as well as the command of the fleet and.
the army, already in the hands of Victor
vuumcctuat Emmanuel's representatives. If war with
Austria was really impending, incalculable
mischief might be caused by the existence of a semi-
independent Government at Naples, reckless, in its en-
thusiasm for the march on Rome, of the effect which its
acts might produce on the French alliance. In any case
the control of Italian affairs could hut half belong to the
King and his Minister if Garibaldi, in the full glory of
his unparalleled exploits, should add the Dictatorship
of Naples to the Dictatorship of Sicily. Accordingly
Cavour plied every art to accelerate the inevitable revo-
lution. Persano and the Sardinian ambassador. Villa-
marina, had their confederates in the Bourbon Ministry
and in the Eoyal Family itself. But their efibrts to
drive King Francis from Naples, and to establish the
authority of Victor Emmanael before (Garibaldi's arrival,
were baffled partiy by the tenacity of the King and
Queen, partly by the opposition of the committees of
the Party of Action, who were determined that power
should fall into no bands bat those of Garibaldi himself.
It was not till Garibaldi had reached Salerno, and the
Bourbon generals had one after another decliued to
undertake the responsibility of command in a battle
against him, that Fraucis resolTed on flight. It was
now feared that he might induce the fleet to sail with
him, and even that he might hand it over to the
Anstrians. The crews, it was believed, were willing to
follow the Xing ; the officers, though inclined to the
Italian cause,, would be powerless to prevent them.
There was not an boar to lose. On the night of
September 5th, after the King's intention to quit the
capital had become known, Fersano and Yillamarina
disguised themselves, and in company with their parti-
sans mingled with the crews of the fleet, whom they
induced by bribes and persuasion to empty the boilers
and to cripple the engines of their ships. When,
on the 6th, King Francis, having announced his
intention to spare the capita bloodshed, went on
board a mail steamer and quitted the harbour, ac-
companied by the ambassadors of Austria, Prussia,
and Spain, only one vessel of the fleet
followed him. An urgent summons was EMtftuwu,
sent to Garibaldi, whose presence was
now desired by all parties ^ke in order to pre-
vent .the outbreak of disorders. I«eaving bis troops
7-2 ' - ■ '-■ooylc
293 MODEBN BUBOFS. wdl
at Salerno, (Jaribaldi came by railroad to Naples
on the morning of the 7th, escorted only by
ouoaidi aitoi ^ome of lufl staff. The forts were still
viBi, Sept. T. garrisoned by eight thousand of the Bour-
bon troops, but all idea of resistance had been aban-
doned, and Garibaldi drove feai-lessly through the city
in the midst of joyous crowds. His first act as Dictap
tor was to declare the ships of war belonging to the
State of the Two Sicilies united to those of King Victor
Emmanuel under Admiral Persano's command. Before
sunset the flag of Italy was hoisted by the ^N'eapolitan
fleet. The army was not to be so easily incorporated
with the national forces. King Francis, after abandon-
ing the idea of a battle between Naples and Salerno,
had ordered the mass of his troops to retire upon Capua
in order to make a final struggle on the line of the
Volturno, and this order had been obeyed,*
As soon as it had become evident that the entiy of
Oaribaldi into Naples conld not be anticipated by the
establishment of Victor Emmanuel's own authority,
Cavour recognised that bold and aggressive action on
the part of tbe National Government was now a neces-
ThaiMmoniM sity. Garibaldi made no secret of his inten-
^XiBudtiM tion to carrv the Italian arms to Bome. The
lUnhM. BtfL J
'^ time was past when the national moTement
* BiaJielii, Politiqne, p. 377. Peraano, ii. p, 1 — lOSr* Persa&o sent liii
Siaiy in US. to Azeglio, and aaked his odvica on publishing it, Azeglio
refeirad to Catout's saying, '' If we did for ourselves wliat we are doing
for Italj, we should be sad blackguards," and begged Peraamo to let hit
secrets be aeoteta, aajiug that ainoe the partition of Poland no confesnon of
each " ooloasal blackguardism " had boeu published by anj pnblic tau.
uam OAVOUS. AJW TBS FAFAL 8TATB3. 293
ooold be checked at the frontiers of Naples and Tus-
cany. It remained only for Cavour to throw the King's
own troops into the Papal States before Garibaldi could
move from Naples, and, while winning for Italy the
last foot of gronnd that could be won without an
actual conflict with France, to stop short at those limits
where the soldiers of Kapoleon would certainly meet an
invader with their fire. The Pope was still in posses-
Bion of the Marches, of Umbria, and of the territory
between the Apennines and the coast from Orvieto to
Terracina. Cavour had good reason to believe that
Napoleon would not strike on behalf of the Temporal
Power until this last narrow district was menaced. He
resolved to seize upon the Marches and Umbria, and to
brave the consequences. On the day of Garibaldi's
entry into Naples a despatch was sent by Cavour to the
Papal Government requiring, in the name of Victor
Smmanuel, the disbandment of the foreign mercenaries
who in the previous spring had plundered Perugia, and
whose presence was a continned menace to the peace of
Italy. The announcement now made by Napoleon that
he must break off diplomatic relations with the Sar-
dinian Government in case of the invasion of the Papal
States produced no effect. Cavoor replied that by no
other means could he prevent revolution from master-
ing all Italy, and on the 10th of September the
French ambassador quitted Tui'in. "Without waiting for
AntoneUi's answer to his ultimatum, Cavour ordered
the King's troops to cross the frontier. The Papal
army was commanded by Lamorici^re, a French general
2M UODEBXr SUBOPB. WL
who had gained some reputation in Algiers ; but the
resistance offered to the Piedmontese was unexpectedly
feeble. The column which entered Umbria reached the
southern limit without encountering any serious oppo-
sition except from the Irish garrison of Spoleto. In
the Marches, where Lamoriciiire had a considerable
force at his disposal, the dispersion of the Papal troops
and the incapacity shown in their command brought
the campaign to a rapid and inglorious end. The main
body of the defenders was routed on the Husone, near
Loreto, on the 19tb of September. Other divisions
surrendered, and Ancoaa alone remained to Lamorici&re.
suiof Anooiu, Vigorously attacked in this fortress both by
^*'**' land and sea, Lamorici^re surrendered after
a siege of eight days. Within three weeks from Giari-
baldi's entry into Naples the Piedmontese army had com-
pleted the task imposed upon it, and Victor Emmanuel
was master of Italy as far as the Abmzzi.
Cavour's successes had not come a day too soon, for
Garibaldi, since his entry into Naples, was falling more
and more into the hands of the Party of Action, and,
while protesting bis loyalty to Victor Em-
bBi|U,uidae manuel, was openly announcing that he
would march on Rome whether the Bang's
Government permitted it or no. In Sicily the officials
appointed by this Party were proceeding with such
violence that Bepretis, unable to obtain troops from
Cavour, resigned his post. Garibaldi suddenly appeared
at Palermo on the 11th of September, appointed a new
PrO'Bictator, and repeated to the Sicilians that their
union with the Kingdom of Victor Emmaouel must he
pcffitponed until all members of the Italian family were
free. But eyen the personal presence and the angry
words of Garibaldi were powerless to check the strong
expression of Sicilian opinion in favour of immediate
and unconditional annexation. His visit to Palermo
was answered by the appearance of a Sicihan deputation
at Turin demanding immediate union, and complaining
that the island was treated by Garibaldi's officers like a
conquered province. At Naples the rash and violent
utterances of the Dictator were equally condemned.
The Ministers whom be had himself appointed resigned.
Garibaldi replaced them by otliers who were almost
Republicans, and sent a letter to Victor Emmanuel
requesting him to consent to the march upou Rome
and to dismiss Cavour. It was known in Turin that
at this very moment Napoleon was taking steps to
increase the French force in Rome, and to garrison the
whole of the territory that still remained to the Pope.
Victor Emmanuel understood how to reply to Garibaldi's
letter. He remained true to his Minister, and sent
orders to Villamarina at Naples in case Garibaldi should
proclaim the Republic to break off all relations with
him and to secure the fleet. The fall of Ancona on
September 28th brought a timely accession of popularity
and credit to Cavour. He made the Parliament which
assembled at Turin four days later arbiter in the struggle
between Garibaldi and himself, aiid received from it an
almost unanimous vote of confidence. Garibaldi would
perhaps have treated lightly any resoluticoi of Parliament
298 MODBBN BUBOPB. m*
which confiicted with his own opinion : he shrank
from a hreach with the soldier of Kovara and Solferino.
Now, as at other moments of danger, the diameter and
reputation of Victor Emmanuel stood Italy in good
stead. In the enthusiasm which Garibaldi's services
to Italy excited in every patriotic heart, there was
room for thankfulness that Italy possessed a sovereign
and a statesmaa strong enough even to withstand its
hero when his heroism endangered the national cause.*
The King of Naples had not yet abandoned the
hope that one or more of the European Powers wonld
intervene in his behalf. T!ie trustworthy part of his
Thaiuniacn ^rmy had gathered round the fortress of
itovoitn™. Capua on the Volturno, and there were
indications that Garibaldi would here meet with far
more serious resistance than he had yet encountered.
While he was still in Naples, his troops, which
had pushed northwards, sustained a repolse at
Cajazzo. Emboldened by this success, the Neapolitan
army at the beginning of Octobt-r assumed the often-
sive. It was with difficulty that Garibaldi, placing
himself again at the head of his forces, drove the
enemy back to Capua. But the arms of Victor
Emmanuel were now thrown into the scale. Crossing
the Apennines, and driving before him the weak force
that was intended to bar his way at Isernia, the King
descended in the rear of the Neapolitan army. The
Bourbon commander, warned of his approach, moved
* Btanolii, Folitiqne, p. 3S3. PerSMlo, ui- SI* BJWwM, DipIoiiiaEU.
riil 337. GsritwlOi, Eplai, i. 127.
L ,l,z..tvG00gIf
tSM. nOTOa EiOUNUEL AND QASJBALDL 297
northwards on the line of the Oangliano, leaving a
garrison to defend Capna. Garibaldi followed on his
track, and in the neighboorhood of Teano met King
"Victor Emmanuel (October 26th). The „„^^^
meeting is said to have been cordial on the £!^1i^Mi!k
pwt of the King, reserved on the part of
Craribaldi, who saw In the King's suite the men bj
whom he had been preveoted from invading the Papal
States in the previous year. In spite of their coiomon
patriotism the volunteers of Garibaldi and the army of
Victor Emmanuel were rival bodies, and the relations
between the chiefs of each camp were strained and
difficult. Garibaldi himself returned to the siege of
Capua, while the King marched northwards against the
retreatiog Neapolitans. All that was great in Garibaldi's
career was now in fact accomplished. The politicians
about him had attempted at Kaples, as in Sicily, to
postpone the union with Victor Emmanuel's monarchy,
and to convoke a Southern Parliament which should fix
the conditions on which annexation would be permitted;
but, after discrediting the General, they had been crashed
by public opinion, and a popul^ vote which was
taken at the end of October on the question of immediate
union showed the m^ori^ in favour of this course to
be overwhelming. After the surrender of Capua on the
2ndof November, Victor Emmanuel made his entry into
Naples. Garibaldi, whose request for the Lieutenancy of
Sonthem Italy for the space of a year with iiill powers
was refused by the King,* declined all minor honours
* "Le Bin riptmdit tont wnrt; ' C'eai impoMiUe."' Cavonr to Ida
/
288 MODEBIT SUBOPE. uh.
and rewards, and departed to his home, still filled with
resentment against Cavour, and promising liis soldiers
that he would return in the spring and lead them to
Rome and Venice. The reduction of Gaeta, where
Kiug Francis II. bad taken refuge, and of the citadel
of Uessina, formed the last act of the war. The French
fleet for some time prevented the Sardiniaus from
operating against Gaeta from the sea, and the siege in
consequence made slow progress. It was not until the
middle of January, 1861, that Napoleon permitted the
French admiral to quit his station. The bombardment
was now opened both by land and sea, aud after a brave
pijiofGieta. resistance Gaeta surrendered on the 14th of
1^1*. 18*1. Pebniary, King Francis aud his young
Queen, a sister of the Empress of Austria, were con-
veyed in a French steamer to the Papal States, and
there began their life-long exile. The citadel of Mes-
sina, commanded by one of the few Neapolitan officers
who showed any soldierly spirit, maintained its obstinate
defence for a month after the Bourbon flag had dis-
appeared from the mainland.
Thus in the spring of 1861, within two years from
the outbreak of war with Austria, Italy with the
exception of Rome and Venice was united under
Victor Emmanuel. Of all the European Powers, Great
Britain alone watched the creation of the
CftToin'i poller
wian^to ng^y Italian Kingdom with complete sym-
™°^ pathy and approval. Austria, though it
•miMBMdor at London, Not. IS, in Bianohi, FoIIUqne, p. 386. La FariiUi,
Eput, U. 438. Ferskoo, iv. U. Onenoni, it 212.
MO. ANTWIPATIONa OF OAVOUR. 299
had made peace at Zurich, declined to renew diplomatic
intercourse with Sardinia, and protested against the
assumption by Victor Emmanael of the title of King
of Italy. Russia, the ancient patron of the Neapolitan
Bourbons, declared that geographical conditions alone
prevented its intervention against their despoilers.
Prussia, though under a new sovereign, had not yet
completely severed the tics which bound it to Austria.
Nevertheless, in spite of wide political ill-will, and of
the passionate hostility of the clerical party throughout
Europe, there was little probability that the work of
the Italian people would be overthrown by external
force. The problem which faced Victor Emmanuel's
Government was not so much the fru^tratioa of re-
actionary designs from without as the determination of
the true line of policy to be followed in regard to Rorae
and Venice. There were few who, like Azeglio, held
that Rome might be permanently left outside the
Italian Kingdom ; there were none wlio held this of
Venice. Garibaldi might be mad enough to hope for
victory in a campaign against Austria and against
France at the head of such a troop as he himself could
muster ; Cavour would have deserved ill of his country
if he had for one moment countenanced the belief that
the force which had overthrown the Neapolitan Bourbons
could with success, or with impunity to Italy, measure
itself against the defenders of Venetia or of Rome.
Tet the mind of Cavour was not one which could rest
in mere paseive expectancy as to the future, or in mere
condemnation of the unwise schemes of others. His
300 MODERN EUBOPS. ml
inteUigence, bo laminons, so peDetrating, that in its
utterances we seem at times to be listening to the very
spirit of the age, ranged over wide fields of moral and
of spiritual interests in its forecast of the future of
Italy, and spent its last force in one of those prophetic
delineations whose breadth and power the world can feel,
though a later time alone can judge of their correspond-
ence with the destined coarse of history. Venice was
less to Europe than Eome ; its tnmsfer to Italy would,
Cavour believed, he effected either bj arms or negotia-
tion BO soon as the German race should find a really
national Government, and refuse the service which had
hitherto been exacted from it for the maintenance of
Austrian interests. It was to Prussia, as the represen-
tative of nationality in Germany, that Cavour looked
as the natural ally of Italy in the vindication of that
part of the national inheritance which still lay under
the dominion of the Hapsburg. Eome, unlike Venice,
was not only defended by foreiga arms, it was the seat
of a Power whose empire over the mind of man was not
the sport of military or political vicissitudes. Circum-
stances might cause France to relax its grasp on
Bome, hut it was not to such an accident that Cavour
looked for the incorporation of Rome with Italy. He
conceived that the time would arrive when the Catholic
world would recognise that the Church would best fulfil
its task in complete separation from temporal power.
Rome would then assume its natural position as the
centre of the Italian State ; the Church would be the
noblest friend, not the misjudging enemy, of the Italian
national monarchy. Cavour'^ own religious beliefs were
perhaps less simple than he chose to represent them.
Occupying himself, however, with institutions, not with
dogmas, he regarded the Church in profound earnest-
ness as a humanising and elevating power. He valued
its independence so highly that even od the suppression
of the Piedmontese monasteries he had refused to give
to the State the administration of the revenue arising
from the sale of their lands, and had formed this into a
fund belonging to the Cliurch itself, in order that the
clc^Ky Qiight not become salaried officers of the State.
Human freedom v/as the principle in which he trusted ;
and looking upon the Church as the greatest a-ssociation
formed by men, he believed that here too the role of
freedom, of the absence of State-re'gulation, would in
the end beet serve man's highest interests. With the
passing away of the Pope's temporal power, Oavour
imagined that the constitution of the
Church itself would become more demo*
cratie, more responsive to the' movement
of the modem world. His own effort in ecclesiastical
reform had been to improve the condition and to
promote the independence of the lower clergy. He
had hoped that each step in their moral and material
progress would make them more national at heart ; and
though this hope had been but partially fulfilled,
C^vonr had never ceased to cherish the ideal of a
national Church which, while recognising its Head in
Jiome, should cordially and without reserve accept the
friendship of the Italian State.*
* OftTonr 1b Fariuaeuto, p. 030. AiegUo, Oomcpondance Folitiqiu^
f. I8a I* Uin, p. 313. SwU, Oanmr ATutj 1848, p. 303.
TlianMCbnnl)
InthsFn*
HUM.
SOS MODESH BUROFB. MM.
It was in the exposition of these principles, in the
enforcement of the common moral interest of Italian
nationality and the Catholic Church, that Cavour gave
his last counsels to the Italian Parliament. He was
not himself to lead the nation farther towards the
promised land. The immense exertions which he had
maintained during the last three years, the indiguatioa
and anxiety caused to him hy Ghiribaldi's attacks, pro-
duced an illness which Cavour's own careless hahits of
DeahofChTooii ^^^^ *°^ ^'^ unskilfulness of his doctors
juMBpiasu rendered fatal. With dying lips he re-
peated to those about him the words in which he had
summed up his poUcy in the Italian Parliament : " A
free Church in a free State." * Other Catholic lands had
adjusted by Concordats with the Papacy the conflicting
n» ohBBh in claims of temporal and spiritual authority
**" in such matters as the appointment of
bishops, the regulation of schools, the family-rights of
persons married without ecclesiastical form. Cavour
appears to have thought that in Italy, where the whole
nation was in a sense Catholic, the Church might
as safely and as easily be left to manage its own
affairs as in the United States, where the Catholic com-
munity is only one among many religious societies.
His optimism, his sanguine and large-hearted tolerance,
was never more strikingly shown than in this fidelity to
the principle of liberty, even in the case of those who
* " Le oomto le reoonim, hd mrs 1& nudn ot dit i ' Fiste, tnte, Uben
cliieea in libero stato.' Oe fnremt aes demifa^s p&rDlea." Aocoimt of tbs
deftth of OftTonr bf hu niece, Coimtesa Alfieri, in I« IUt«, Oftvoor, p. 319.
no. DSATB OF OAVOUB. »tt
for the time declined aU reconciliation with the Italian
State. Whether Cavonr's ideal was an impracticable
fancy a later age will decide. The ascendency within
the Church of Borne would seem as yet to have
rested with the elements most opposed to the spirit of
the time, most obstinately bent on setting faith and
reason in irreconcilable enmity. In place of that
democratic movement within the hierarchy and the
priesthood which Cayoor anticipated, absolutism has
won a new crown in the doctrine of Papal Infallibility.
Catholic dogma has remained impervious to the solvents
which during the last thirty years have operated with
perceptible success on the theology of Protestant lands.
Each conquest made in the world of thought and
knowledge is still noted aa the next appropriate object
of denunciation by the Vatican. Nevertheless the
cautious spirit will be slow to conclude that hopes like
those of Cavour were wholly vain. A single generation
may see but little of the seed-time, nothing of the
harvests that are yet to enrich mankind. And even if
all wider interests be left oat of view, enough remains
to justify Cavour's policy of respect for the indepen-
dence of the Chun^ in the fact that Italy during the
thirty years succeeding the establishment of its union
has remained free from civil war, Cavour was wont to
refer to the Constitution which the French National
Assembly imposed upon the clei^y in 1790 as the type
of erroneous legislation. Had his own pohcy and that
of his successors not been animated by a wiser spirit;
bad the Government of Italy, after overthrowing the
8M XODBRN BVSOPB.
Pope's temporal soTereignty, sought enemies among tbe
rural priesthood and their congregations, the provinces
added to tlie Italian Kingdom by Garibaldi would
hardly have been maintained by the House of Savoy
without a second and severer struggle. Between the
ideal Italy which filled the thoughts not only of Mazziui
but of some of the best English minds of that time —
the land of immemorial greatness, touched once more by .
the divine hand and advancing from strength to strength
as the intellectual and moral pioneer among nations —
between this ideal and the somewhat hard and common-
place realities of the Italy of to-day there is indeed little
enough resemblance. Poverty, the pressure of inordinate
taxation, the physical and moral habits inherited, from
centuries of evil government, — all these have darkened
in no common measure tbe conditions from which
Italian national life has to be built up. IE in spite
■ of overwhelming difficulties each crisis has hitherto been
surmounted ; if, with all that is faulty and infirm, the
omens for the future of Italy are still favourable, one
source of its good fortune has been the impress given to
its ecclesiastical policy by the great statesman to whom
above all other men it owes the accomplishment of its
union, and who, while claiming for Italy tbe whole of its
national inheritance, yet determined to inflict do need-
less wound upon the conscience of Rome.
D,a,l,zc.bvG00gIe
CHAPTEB V.
Ganncnr afttr 1BS8 — The Begeiu^ bt Fnmia — Aimj-reoisanintion — King
WilHam 1. — Conflict betireen the Crowo &□<! the Pulismeat — BimiArok —
Hie (troggle continued— Aoitria from 1859—1110 Outobor Diploma—
Redstanca of Hungarj — 'Die Beichirath — Rnsais nnder A 'nicwn'iflT H, —
liberatiDn of the Sortt — Poland — The iDmrection of 1863— Agnrion
meMOKB in Poland-SchleiwiK-HolBtain— Death of Fiedarick Til.— Plaii«
of Bismsrak — Campaign in Bchleswig — Conference of London — Treaty of
"Vienna — England and Napoleon TTT, — pniada and Aiutria — ConTention of
QMtein — Italy— Alliance of Fnuaia irith Italy — Propooala for a OongreM
fail— War betwoen Anatria and PruMia^llBpoleaD III. — ElbUKgiit* —
CuBtoEza — Mediation of Napoleon — Treaty of Fragns — South Q«roiany —
Frojecta tor compenBation to Franoe-'AuBbria and Hongary — Detk —
'EBtablishniPiit of the Dual Syatem in An<tria-Hangsi7,
&HORTLT before the events which broke the power of
Anstria in Italy, the Gennan people believed them-
selves to have entered on a new political ^.^ ^^^
era. Kir^ Frederick William IV., who,
since 1848, had disappointed every hope that had been
fixed on Prussia and on himself, was compelled by
mental disorder to withdraw from public affairs in the
antumn of 1868. His brother, the Crown Prince
William, who had for a year acted as the
King's representative, now assumed the Pn^vo^
Begency. In the days when King Frederick
William still retained some vestiges of his reputation
'the Crown Prince had been unpopular, as the supposed
head of the reactionary party ; but the events of the
last few years had exhibited him in a better aspect.
3M MODERN EUBOPS. usa.
Though strong in his telief both in the Divine right of
Icings in general, and in the necessity of a powerful
monarchical mle in Prussia, he was disposed to tolerate,
and even to treat with a certain respect, the humble
. elements of constitutional government which he found
in existence. There was more manliness in his nature
than in that of his brother, more belief in the worth of
his own people. The espionage, the servility, the
overdone professions of sanctity in Manteufiel's regime
displeased him, but most of all he despised its pusil-
lanimity in the conduct of foreign affairs. His heart
indeed was Prussian, not German, and the destiny
which created him the first Emperor of imited Germany
was not of his own making nor of his own seeking ; but
he felt that Prussia ought to bold a far greater station
both in Germany and in Europe than it had held
during his brother's reign, and that the elevation of the
State to the position which it ought to occupy was the
task that lay before himself. During the twelve months
preceding the Eegency the retirement of the King had
not been treated as more than temporary, and the
Crown Prince, though constantly at variance with Man-
teuffel's Cabinet, had therefore not considered himself
at liberty to remove his brother's advisers. His first
act on the assumption of the constitutional office of
Regent was to dismiss the hated Ministry. Prince
Antony of HohenzoIIern-Sigmaringen was , called to
o£Sce, and posts in the Government were gifen to men
well known as moderate Liberals. Though the Kegent
shited in clear terms that he had no intention of form'
UBB-a. GSRMANT. W
ing a Liberal party-administration, his action satisfied
public opinion. The troubles and the failures of 1849
had inclined, men to be content with far less than had
been asked years before. The leaders of the more
advanced sections among the Liberals preferred for the
most part to remain ootside Parliamentary life rather
than to cause embarrassment to the new Government ;
and the elections of 1859 sent to Berlin a body of
representatives fully disposed to work with the Eegent
and his Ministers in the policy of guarded progress
which they had laid down.
This change of spirit in the Prussian Government,
followed by the events that established Italian in-
dependence, told powerfully npon public
opinion throughout Germany. Hopes that ^^T^
had been crushed in 1849 now revived.
With the collapse of military despotism in the Austrian
Empire the cloiids of reaction seemed evetywhete to be
passing away ; ii was possible once more to think of
German national onion and of common liberties in
which all Germans should share. As in 1808 the
nsing of the Spaniards against Kapoleon had inspired
Blucher and his countrymen with the design of a truly
national efibrt against their foreign oppressor, so in
1859 the work of Cavoor challenged the Germans to
prove that their national patriotism and their political
aptitude were not inferior to those of the Italian people.
Men who had been prominent in the National Assembly
at IVankfort again met one another and spoke to the
nation. In the Parliaments of several of the minca
p 2 ■ ■ ^•'"''S^'-'
S08 UODSSS SVltOPa. uas-tt
States rcBolutions were brought forward in favour of
the creation of a central German authority. Protests
were made against the infringement of constitutional
rights that had been common during the last ten years ;
patriotic meetings and demonstrations were held ; and a
National Society, in imitation of that which had pre-
pared the way for union with Piedmont in Central and
Southern Italy, was formally established. There was
indeed no such preponderating opinion in favoar of
Prussian leadership as had existed in 1S4S. The
southern States had displayed a strong sympathy with
Austria in its war with Napoleon III., and had re-
garded the neutrality of Prussia during the Italian
campaign as a desertion of the German cause. Here
there were few who looked with friendly eye upon
Berlin. It was in the minor states of the north, and
especially in Hesse-Cassel, where the struggle between
the Elector and his subjects was once' more breaking
out, that the strongest hopes were directed towards the
new Prussian ruler, and the measures of his govern-
ment were the most anxiously watched.
The Prince Regent was a soldier by profession and
habit. He was bom in 1797, and had been present at
the battle of Arcis-sur-Aube, the last fought by Napo-
leon against the Allies in 1814. During forty years he
had served on every commission that had been occupied
with Prussian military afiaits ; no man
frouriuidflM better understood the military organisation
of his country, no man more clearly recog-
nised its capacities and its faults. The defective con-
dition of the Prussian army had been the principal,
though not the sole, cause of the miserable submiBsion
to Austria at Olmiitz in 1850, and of the abandonment
of all claims to German leadership on the part of the
Court of Berlin. The Crown Prince would himself have
risked all chances of disaster rather than inllict upon
Prussia the humiliation with which King Frederick
"William then purchased peace ; but Manteuffel had
convinced his sovereign that the army conM not engage
in a campaign against Austria without ruin. Military
impotence was the only possible justification for the
policy then adopted, and the Crown Prince determined
that Prussia should not under his own rule have the
Banie excuse for any political shortcomings. The work
of reorganisation was indeed begun during the reign of
Frederick William IV., through the enforcement of
the three-years' service to which the conscript was
liable by law, but which had fallen during the long
period of peace to two-years' service. The number of
troops with the colours was thus largely increased, but
no addition bad been made to the yearly levy, and no
improvement attempted in the organisation of the liand-
wehr. When in 1859 the order for mobilisation was
given in consequence of the Italian war, it was dis-
covered that the Landwehr battalions were almost
useless. The members of this force were mostly
married men approaching middle life, who had been too
long engaged in other pursuits to resume tlieir military
duties with readiness, and whose call to the field left their
families without means of support and chargeable upon
310 MODEBir SimOPS, ML
tlie pablic parse. Too mnch, in the jadgment of the
reformers of the Prnssian army, was required firom men
past youth, not enough from youth itself. The plan of
the Prince Regent i^as therefore to enforce in the first
instance with far more stringency the law imposing
BehvHirfn- *^® Universal obligation to military service ;
'"' "" and, while thus raising the annual levy from
40,000 to 60,000 men, to extend the period of service
in the Reserve, into which the young soldier passed on
the completion of his three years with the colours, from
two to four years. Asserting with greater rigour its
claim to seven years in the early life of the citizen, the
State would gain, without incloding the Landwehr, an
effective army of fonr hundred thousand men, and would
practically he able to dispense with the service of those
who were approaching middle life, except in cases of
great urgency. In the execution of this reform the
Government coold on its own authority enforce the
increased levy and the full three years' service in the
standing army ; for the prolongation of service in the
Reserve, and for the greater expenditure entailed by the
new system, the consent of Parliament was necessary.
The general principles on which the proposed re-
otganisation was based were accepted by public opinion
and by both Chambers of Parliament ; it was, however,
Tirtprwdin ''^'*^ ^y ^^^ Liberal leaders that the increase
Sir'iS^iafl£ of expenditure might, without impairing the
efficiency of the army, be avoided by re-
turning to the system of two-years' service with the
colours, which during so long a period had been
. tm-a. TBJjaaiAN AMWY BILL. 811
thoaghfc safficieut for the training of the soldier. The
Eegent, however, was convinced that the discipline and
the instmction of three years were indispensable to the
Pruasian conscript, and he refused to accept the com-
promise suggested. The mobilisation of 1859 had given
him an opportunity for forming additional battalions ;
and although the Landwelir were soon dismissed to their
homes the new formation was retained, and the place
of the retiring militiamen was filled by conscripts of
the year. The Lower Chamber, in voting the sum
required in 1860 for the increased numbers of tbe
army, treated this arrangement as temporary, and
limited tbe grant to one year; in spi o of this the
Regent, who on the death of his brother in January,
1861, became King of Prussia, formed the additional
battalions into new regiments, and gave
to these new re^menls their names and RiDgwrniun.
° _ ina., 1B81,
colours. The year 1861 passed without
bringing the questions at issue between the Govern-
ment and the Chamber of Deputies to a settlement.
Public feeling, disappointed in tbe reserved and hesi-
tating policy which was still followed by tbe Court in
German afiairs, stimulated too by the rapid consolida-
tion of the Italian monarchy, which the Prussian Gktvem-
ment on its part had as yet declined to recognise, was
becoming impatient and resentful. It seemed as if the
Court of Berlin still shrank from committing itself to
the national cause. The general confidence reposed in the
new ruler at his accession was passing away ; and when
in the summer of 1861 the dissolution of Parliament
Sia MODEBir EJTROPa. vm.
took place, the elections resulted in the retom not
only of a Progressist majority, but of a majority little
inclined to submit to measures of compromise, or to
shrink from the assertion of its full constitutional
rights.
Tbe new Parliament assembled at the beginning of
1862. Under the impulse of public opinion, the Go-
vemment was now beginning to adopt a more vigorouB
pintPkrik- policy in German affairs, and to re-assert
luDtotiwi. Prussia's claims to an independent leader-
ship in defiance of the restored Diet of Frankfort.
But the conflict with the Lower Chamber was not to
be averted by revived enei^ abroad. The Army Bill,
which was passed at once by the Upper House, was
referred to a hostile Committee on reaching the
Chamber of Deputies, and a resolution was carried
insisting on the right of the representatives of the
people to a far more effective control over the Butlget
than they had hitherto exercised. The result of this
DiMoiutioB. '^^^ ^^ ^® dissolution of Parliament by
May. 186*. ^-^^ Kiog, aud the resignation of the
Ministry, with the exception of General Boon, Minister
of "War, and two of the most conservative among
his colleagues. Prince Holienlohe, President of the
Upper House, became chief of the Government. There
was now an open and undisguised conflict between
the Crown and the upholders of Parliamentary rights.
"King or Parliament" was the expression in which
the newly-appointed Ministers themselves summed
up the struggle. The utmost pressure was exerted
l^ the Government in the course of the elections
which followed, bnt in vtun. The I^ogressist party
returned in overwhelming strength to the BBoondPrfk.
new Parliament; the voice of the country "^ '"*'*■
seemed unmistakably to condemn the policy to which
the King and his advisers were committed. After
a long and sterile discussion in the Budget Committee,
the debate on the Army Bill began in the liower House
on the 11th of September. Its principal clauses were
rejected by an almost unanimous vote. An attempt
made by General Boon to satisfy his opponents by a
partial and conditional admission of the principle of
two-years* service resulted only in increased exaspera-
tion on both sides. Hohenlohe resigned, and the King
now placed in power, at the head of a Minis-
try of conflict, the most resolute and un- i™«>MinWBr.
flinching of all his friends, the most con-
temptuous scorner of Parliamentatj majorities, Herr
von Bismarck.*
The new Minister was, like Oavonr, a country
gentleman, and, like Cavour, he owed his real entry
into public life to the revolutionary movement of 1848.
He had indeed held some obscure oflScial posts before
that epoch, but it was as a member of the
United Diet which assembled at Berlin iu
April, 1848, that he first attracted the attention of
King or people. He was one of two Deputies who
refused to join in the vote of thanks to Frederick
■ Botielite fliwr der Hilibdr-etat, p. 669. Schnlthew, Enrapaiscber
GBsehiohb Kaleader, 1862, p. 122.
SU VODEBJf EUBOFB. ISM.
Williatn IV. for the CioDstitatioa whicb he had pro-
mised to Prussia. Bismarck, then thirty-three years
old, was a Royalist of Hoyalists, the type, as it seemed,
of the loagh and masterful Junker, or Sqoire, of the
older parls of Prussia, fo whom all reforms from those
of Stein downwards were hateful, all ideas but those of
the barrack and the kennel alien. Others in the spring
of 1848 lamented the concessions made by the Crown
to the people ; Bismarck had the coun^ to say so.
When reaction came there were naturally many, and
among them King Frederick William, who were in-
terested in the man who iu the heyday of constitutional
enthusiasm had treated the whole movement as so much
midsummer madness, and had remained faithful to
monarchical authority as the one thing needful for the
Prussian State. Bismarck continued to take a pro-
minent part in the Parliaments of Berlin and Erfurt ;
it was not, however, till 1851 that he passed into the
inner official circle. He was then sent as the repre-
sentative of Prussia to the restored Diet of Frankfort.
As an absolutist and a conservative, brought up in the
traditions of the Holy Alliance, Bismarck had in efu-lier
days looked up to Austria as the mainstay of
monarchical order and the historic barrier against
the flood of democratic and wind-driven sentiment
which threatened to deluge Q-ermany. He had even
approved the surrender made at Olmiitz in 1850, as a
matter of necessilrf ; but the belief now grew sirong
in his mind, and was confirmed by all he saw at Frank-
fort, that Austria under Schwarzenberg'a nUe waa no
longer tlie Power wliicb had been content to share the
Qerman leadership with FruBsia in the period before
1848, but a Power wliicb meant to rule in Germanj
uncontrolled. In contact with the representatives of
that outworn system wbicb Anstria had resuscitated at
Frankfort, and with the instruments of the dominant
State itself, Bismarck soon learnt to detest the paltri-
ness of the one and the insolence of the other. He
declared the so-called Federal system to be a mere
device for employing the secondary German States
for the aggrandisement of Austria and the humilia-
tion of Prussia. The Coui-t of Vienna, and with it
the Diet of Frankfort, became in bis eyes the enemy
of Prussian greatness and independence. Daring the
Crimean war he was the vigorous opponent of an
alliance with tbe Western Powers, not only from dis-
trust of France, and from regard towards Russia as on
tbe whole tbe most constant and the most natural ally
of his own country, but from tbe conviction tbat Prussia
ought to assert a national policy wholly independent of
that of the Court of Vienna. That the Emperor of
Austria was approaching more or less nearly to union
with France and England was, in Bismarck'a view, a
good reason why Prussia should stand fast in its rela-
tiona of friendship with St. Petersbui^.* The policy
of neutrality, which King Frederick William and
Manteoffel adopted more ont of disinclination to
Btrennooa action than from any clear political view, was
* PoacbingM-, Ftenseen im Bondestag ii, 69, 97; ir. 178. Btim,
Binurok, i. 606.
«1S UODESN SXmOFB. vm.
advocated by Bismarck for reasons which, if they made
Europe nothiog and Prussia everytbtng, were at least
inspired by a keen and accurate perception of Pma-
eia's own interests in its present and future relations
with its neighbours. When the reign of Frederick
William ended, Bismarck, who stood high in the confi-
dence of the new Regent, was sent as ambassador to St.
Petersburg. He subsequently represented Prussia for
a short time at the Court of Napoleon III., and was
recalled by the King from Paris in the autumn of 1862
in order to be placed at the head of the Government.
Far better versed in diplomacy than in ordinary ad-
ministration, he assumed, together with the Presidency
of the Cabinet, the Ministry of Foreign ASairs.
There were now at the head of the Prussian State
three men eminently suited to work with one another,
and to carry out, in their own roagh and
ths Lower military fashion, the policy which was to
Ciumbw, isn. J . ' r J
unite Qerinany under the House of Hohen-
zuUem. The Xing, Bismarck, and Boon were tho-
roughly at one in their aim, the enforcement of
Prussia's ascendency by means of the army. The
designs of the Minister, which expanded with success
and which involved a certain daring in the choice of
means, were at each new development so ably veiled or
disclosed, so dexterously presented to the sovereign, as
to overcome his hesitation on striking into many an un-
accustomed path. Roon and his workmen, who, in the
face of a hostile Parliament and a hostile Press, had to
supply to Bismarck what a foreign alliance and enthu-
siastic national sentiment lad supplied to Caronr, foiled
for Prussia a weapoo of bucIi temper that, against the
enemies on whom it was employed, no extraordinary
genius was necessary to reuder its thrust fatal. It
was no doubt difScalt for the Prime Minister, without
alarming his sovereign and without risk of an immediate
breach with Austria, to make his ulterior aims so clear
as to carry the Parliam^it with him in the policy of
military reorganisation. "Words frank even to brutality
were uttered by him, but they sounded more like
menace and bluster than the explanation of a well-con-
sidered plan. " Prussia must keep its forces together,"
he said in one of his first Parliamentary appearances,
" its boundaries are not those of a sound State. The
great questions of the time are to be decided not by
speeches and votes of m^orities but by blood and
iron." After the experience of 1848 and 1850, a not
too despondent political obs.erver might well have
formed the conclusion that nothing less than the mili-
tary overthrow of Austria conld give to Germany any
tolerable system of national government, or even secure
to Prussia its legitimate field of action. This was the
keystone of Bismarck's belief, but he failed to make his
purpose and his motives intelligible to the representa-
tives of the Prussian people. He was taken for a mere
bully and absolutist of the old type. His personal
characteristics, his arrogance, his sarcaem, his habit of
banter, exasperated and inflamed. Boon was no better
Boited to the atmosphere of a popular assembly. Each
eacoxmt«r of the Ministers with the Chamber embittered
81B MODBRW BUBOPK urn.
the stra^le and made reconciliation more difficult.
The Parliamentary system o£ Frasaia seemed threatened
in its very existence wlien, after the rejection by the
Chamber of Deputies of the clause in the Budget pro-
viding for the cost of the army-reorganisation, this
clanse was restored by the Upper House, and the
Budget of the Government passed in its original form.
By the terms of the Constitution the right of the Tipper
House in matters of taxation waa limited to the approval
or rejection of the Budget sent up to it from the Cham-
ber of Bepresentatives. It possessed no power of
amendment. Bismarck, however, had formed the theory
that in the event of a disagreement between the two
Houses a situation arose for which the Coostitation
- had not provided, and in which therefore the Crown
was stiU possessed of its old absolute authority. No
compromise, no negotiation between the two Houses,
was, in his view, to be desired. He was resolved to
govern and to levy taxes without a Budget, and had
obtained the King's permission to close the session
immediately the Upper House had given it« vote. Bat
before the order tor prorogation could be brought down
the President of tlie Lower Chamber had assembled his
colleagues, and the nnanimous vote of those present
declared the action of the Upper House null and void.
In the agitation attending this triid of strength between
the Crown, the Ministry and the Upper House on one
Bide and the Bepresentative Chamber on the otherthe
session of 1862 closed.*
* Habn, Tunt Biunarck, i 66, This work is a collection of donunoils,
nm*. THE CONFLIOT TIME IN PBVBSIA. 819
The Depaties, returning to their constituencies,
carried with them the spirit of combat, and received
the most demonstrative proofs of popular
sympathy and support. , Representations of
great earnestness were made to the King, but they
failed to shake in the slightest degree his conlidence in
his Minister, or to bend his fixed resolution to carry out
luB military reforms to the end. The claim of Parlia-
ment to interfere with matters of military organisation
in Prussia touched him in his most sensitive point.
He declared that the aim of his adversaries was nothing
les^ than the establishment of a Parliamentary instead
of a royal army. In perfect sincerity he believed that
the convulsions of 1848 were on the point of brtaking
out afresh. "You mourn the conflict betwetn the
Crown and the natiunal representatives," he said to the
spokesman of an important society ; " do I not mourn
it? I sleep no single night." The anxiety, the de-
spondency of the sovereign were shared by the friends
of Prussia throughout Germany ; its enemies saw with
wonder that Bismarck in his struggle with the educated
Liberalism of the middle classes did not shrink from
dalliance with tlie Socialist leaders and their organs.
When Parliament reassembled at the beginning of
1863 the conflict was resamed with even greater heat.
The Lower Chamber carried an address to ■b^,„„,b]^
the King, which, while dwelling on the t""™^!**
■peeoliee, and letters not onlj bj BUm&rck UmeeU but on all the principal
mAtten in which Bismanilc wu ooncemed. It i« perbap'i, ircaa tha
Gernuta point of view, the most importutt repertory of authorili^Q lor tho
pericd 1802—1685.
SaO UODESN EVBOPB. WM
loyalty of the Prussiaa people to their chief, charged
the. Ministers with vIolatiDg the Constitutioa, and de-
manded their dismissal. The King refused to receive
the deputation which was to present the address, and
in the written commnnicatioa in which he replied to it
he sharply reproved the Assemhly for their errors and
presumption. It was in vain that the Army Bill was
again introduced. The House, while allowing the
ordinary military expenditure for the year, struck out
the costs of the reorganigation, and declared Ministers
personally answerahle for the sums expended. Each
appearance of the leading members of the Cabinet now
became 'the signal for contumely and altercation. The
decencies of debate ceased to be observed on either side.
When the President attempted to set some limit to the
violence of Bismarck and Boon, and, on resistance to his
authority, terminated the sitting, the Ministers de-
clared that they would no longer appear in a Chamber
where freedom of speech was denied to them. Affairs
came to a deadlock. The Chamber again appealed to
the King, and insisted that reconciliation between the
Crown and the nation was impossible so long as the
present Ministers remained in office. The King, now
thoroughly indignant, charged the Assembly with at-
tempting to win for itself supreme power, expressed his
gratitude to his Ministers for their resistance to this
usurpation, and declared himself too confident in the
loyalty of the Prussian people to be intimidated by
threats. His reply was followed by the prorogation of
the Assembly (May ^6th). A dissolution would have
UtML THB CONFUOT TIMS JN PBUBBIjL 321
been worse than useless, for in the actoal stttte-of pablie
opinion the Opposition would probably have triumphed
throughout the country. It only remtUQed for Bis-
marck to hold his ground, and, having silenoed the
Parliament for a while, to silence the Press
also by the exercise of autocratic power, u^ih*
The CoDStitution authorised the King, in
the absence of the Chambers, to publish euaotments on
matters of urgency having the force of laws. No sooner
had the session been closed than an edict was issued
erapoweriag the Qovemmeot, without resort to courts
of law, to suppress any newspaper after two warnings.
An outburst of public iudignation branded this return
to the principles of pure despotism in Prussia; but
neither King nor Minister was to be diverted by threats
or by expostulations &om his course. The Press was
effectively silenced. So profound, however, was the
distrust now everywhere felt as to the future of Prussia,
and so deep the resentment against the Minister in all
circles where liiberal influences penetrated, that the
Crown Prince himself, after in vain protesting against a
policy of violence which endangered his own prospective
interests in the Crown, publicly expressed his disap-
proval of the action of Government. For this offence
he was never forgiven.
The course which affairs were taking at Berlin
excited the more bitter regret and disappointment
among all friends of Prussia as at this very i,,,,^^^
iame it seemed that constitutional govern- '^'''
ment was being saccessfully established in the western
888 ifODEBN SUBOPB. WM<i
part of the Austrian Empire. The centralised military
despotiBm with which Austria emerged from the con-
TtUsions of 1848 had been allowed ten years of undis-
puted Bway; at the end of this time it had hrooght
things to such a pass that, after a campaign in which
there had heen but one great battle, and while still in
possession of a vast army and an unbroken chain of
fortresses, Austria stood powerless to move hand or foot
It was not the defeat of Solferino or the cession of Lorn-
hardy that exhibited the prostration of Austria's power,
but the fact that while the conditions of the Peace of
^Zurich were swept away, and Italy was united under
Victor Emmanuel in defiance of the engagements made
by Napoleon III. at Yillafranca, the Austrian Emperor
was compelled to look on with folded arms. To have
drawn the sword again, to have fired a shot in defence
of the Pope's temporal power or on behalf of the vassal
princes of Tuscany and Modena, would have been to
risk the existence of the Austrian monarchy. The
State was all but bankrupt; rebellion might at any
moment break out in Hungary, which had already sent
thousands of soldiers to the Italian camp. Peace at
whatever price was necessary abroad, and at home the
system of centralised despotism could no longer exist,
come what might in its place. It was natural that the
Emperor should but imperfectly understand at the first
the extent of the concessions which it was necessaiy for
him to make. He determined that the Provincial Councils
which Schwarzenbeig had promised in 1850 should be
called into existence, and that a Council of the Empire
.. . CooqII'
(Eeichsrath), drawn in part from these, shouW assemble
at Vienna, to advise, thoagh not to control, the Govern-
ment in matters of finance. So urgent, however, were
the needs of the exchequer, that the Emperor proceeded
at once to the creation of the Central Council, and
nominated its first members himself. (March, 1860.)
That the Hungarian members nominated by the
Smperor would decline to appear at Vienna unless
some farther guarantee was given for the
restoration of Hungarian liberty was well
known. The Emperor accordingly promised to restore
the ancient county-organisation, which had filled so great
a space in Hungarian history before 1848, and to take
steps for assembling the Hungarian Diet. This, with
the repeal of an edict injurious to the Protestants, opened
the way for reconciliation, and the nominated Hungarians
took their place in the Council, thougli under protest
that the existing arrangement could only be accepted as
preparatory to the full restitution of the rights of their
country. The Council continued in session during the
summer of 1860. Its duties were financial; but the
establishment of financial equilibrium in Austria was
inseparable &om the establishment of political stability-
and public confidence ; and the Council, in its last
sittings, entered on the widest coilstitutional problems.
The non-German members were in the majority; and
while .all parties alike condemned the fallen absolutism,
the rival declarations of policy submitted to the Council
marked the opposition which was henceforward to exist
between the German Iiiberalfi of Austria and the variovs
r3
821 MODEBN EUROPE. ntb
Nationalist or Federalist groups. The Mt^yars, uniting
with those who had been their bitterest enemies, de-
clai-ed that the ancient independence in legislation, and
administration of the several countries subject to the
House of Hapsburg must be restored, each country
retaining its owd historical character. The German
minority contended that the Emperor should bestow
upon his subjects such institutions as, while
MmLrtiiii based on the right of self-government,
should secure the unity of the Empire and
the force of its central authority. All parties were for
a constitutional system aod for local liberties in one
form or another ; but while the Magyars and their .
supporters sought for nothing less than national inde-
pendence, the Germans would at the most have granted
a uniform system of provincial self-government in strict
subordination to a central representative body drawn
from the whole Empire and legislating for the whole
Empire. The decision of the Emperor was necessarily a
ThvDipiomtot compromise. By a Diploma published on
o«,aM8«.. j.j^g 20th of October he promised to restore
to Hungary its old Constitution, and to grant wide
legislative rights to the other States of the Monarchy,
establishing for the transaction of affairs common to the
whole Empire an Imperial Council, and reserving for
the non-Hungarian members of this Council a qualified
right of legislation for all the Empire except Hungary.*
The Magyars had conquered their King; and all
* S«tmiihiiigderStut«»<;tellOeBt9miDlii(1861),pp.2,33. DruJalin
Terfaasougsticdt, p. lOT.
I ,i,z<,.f,GoogIf
the impetnouB patriotism tliat had been crashed down
since the ruin of 1849 now again burst into flame.
The CoQQty Assemblies met, and elected as .^
their officers men who had been condemned SnTSToik.
to death in 1849 and who were liTJng in
exile; they swept away the existing law-eonrts, refused
the taxes, and proclaimed the legislation of 1848 again
in force. Francis Joseph seemed anxious to avert a
conflict, and to prove both in Hungary and in the
other parts of the Empire the sincerity of his promises
of reform, on which the nature of the provincial Con-
stitntions which were published immediately after the
Diploma of October had thrown some doubt. At the
instance of his Hungarian advisers he dismissed the
chief of his Cabinet, and called to office Schmerling,
who, in 1348, had been Prime Minister of the
Oenoan National G-ovemment at Frankfort. Schmer-
ling at once promised important changes in the pro-
vincial systems drawn up by his predecessor, but in
his dealings with Hungary he proved far less tract-
able than the Magyars had expected. If the Hun-
garians had recovered their own constitutional forms,
they still stood threatened with the supremacy of a
Central Council in all that related to themselves in com-
mon with the rest of the Empire, and gainst this they
rebelled. But from the establishment of this Council
of the Empire neither the Emperor nor Schmerling
would recede. An edict of February 26th, 1861, while
it made good the changes promised by Schmerling in
the several provincial systems, conflrmed the general
891 MODEBN BUBOPS. ML
prorisionB of the Diploma of October, and declared that
the Emperor would maintain the Constitntion of his
dominions as now established against all attack.
In the following April the Provincial Diets met
througbont the Austrian Empire, and the Diet of the
Hungarian Kingdom assembled at Pesth.
Mwittun The first duty of each of these bodies wbs
to elect representatives to the Council of
the Empire which was to meet at Vienna. Neither
Hungary nor Croatia, however, would elect such repre-
sentatives, each claiming complete legislative independ-
ence, and declining to recognise any such external
authority as it was now proposed to create. The
Emperor warned the Hungarian Diet against the con-
sequencea of its action ; but the national spirit of the
Magyars was thoroughly roused, and the County Assem-
blies vied with one another in the violence of their
addresses to the Sovereign. The Diet, reviving the
Constitutional difficulties connected with the abdication
of Ferdinand, declared that it would only negotiate
for the coronation of Francis Joseph after the esta-
blishment of a Hungarian Ministry and the restora-
tion of Croatia and Transylvania to the Hungarian
Kingdom. Accepting Schmerling's contention that the
ancient constitutional rights of Hungary had been
extinguished by rebellion, the Emperor insisted on the
establishment of a Council for the whole Empire^ and
refused to recede irom the declarations which he had
made in the edict of February. The Diet hereupon
protested, in a long and vig^oroos address to the Kong,
ML TSE BEI0E8BATH AT riENNA. S27
against the validity fA all laws made without its own
concairenee, and declared that Francis Joseph had ren-
dered an agreement between the Kiag and the nation
impossible. A dissolution followed. The County As-
semblies took up the national struggle. They in their
turn were sappressed ; their officers were dismissed,
and miUtary rule was established throughout the land,
though with explicit declarations ou the part of the
King that it was to last only till the legally existing
Constitution could be brought into peaceful working,*
Meanwhile the Central Representative Body, now
by enlargement of its functions and increase in the
number of its members made into a Parlia-
ment of the Empire, assembled at Vienna. «tvicnM, iLy,
Its real character was necessarily altered by
the absence of representatives from Hungary ; and for
some time the Government seemed disposed to limit its
competence to the affairs of the Cis-Leithan provinces;
but after satisfying himself that no accord with Hun-
gary was possible, the Emperor announced this fact to
the Assembly, and bade it perform its part as the
organ of the Empire at large, without regard to the
abstention of those who did not choose to exercise their
rights. The Budget for the entire Empire was accord-
iugly submitted to the Assembly, and for the first time
the cvpenditure of the Austrian State was laid open to
public examination and criticism. The first session of
this Parliument lasted, with adjournments, from May,
* Satumtmig der Stubaoton, p. 39. Der TTngsriache Bdchstag 18S1,
pp. 3, 192, 338. Arnold rorster. Life rf Deik, p. Ul. ( "(Miok'
S8B MODB&ff aUROPB. isn-n.
1861, to December, 1862. In legislation it effected
little, but its relations as a wbole with the Government
remained excellent, and its loDg-continued activity,
unbroken by popular disturbances, did much to raise
the fallen credit of the Austrian State and to win for it
the regard of Germany. On the close of the session
the Provincial Diets assembled, and throughout the
spring of 1863 the rivalry of the Austrian nationaliti(>3
gave abundant animation to many a local
of om Eekh.- capital. In the next summer the Reiehs-
rath reassembled at Vienna. Though Hun-
gary remained in a condition not fur removed from
rebellion, the Parliamentary system of Austria was
gaining in strength, and indeed, as it seemed, at the
expense of Hungary itself; for the Boutnanian and
German population of Transylvania, rejoicing in the
opportunity of detaching themselves from the M^yars,
now sent deputies to Vienna. While at Berlin each
week that passed sharpened the antagonism between
the nation and its Government, and made the Minister's
name more odious, Austria seemed to have snccessfully
broken with the traditions of its past, and to be fast
earning for itself an honourable place among States of
the constitutional type.
One of the reproaches brought against Bismarck by
the Progressist majority in the Parliamentof Berlin was
that he had isolated Prussia both in Germany and in
Europe. That he bad roused against the Goverment of
his country the public opinion of Germany was true: that
he had alienated Prussia from all Europe wajii not tbe
\BM-»L nUSSIA AFTBB THE OBB£SAS WAR. 329
case ; on the contrarjr. lie bad established a closer rela-
tion between the Courts of Berlin and St. Petersburg
than had existed at any time since the commencement
of the Eegency, and had secored for Prussia a degree of
confidence and goodwill on the part of the Czar which,
in the memorable years that were to follow, served it
scarcely less effectively than an armed alliance. Russia,
since the Crimean War, had seemed to be Ha,^niider
entering upon an epoch of boundless change. ■*i'™^"°-
The calamities with which the reign of Nicholas had
closed had excited in that narrow circle of ^Russian
society where thought had any existence a vehement
revulsion against the stenle and unchanging system of
repression, the grinding servitude of the last thirty
years. Prom the Emperor downwards all educated
men believed not only that the system of government,
but that the whole order of Russian social life, must be
recast. The ferment of ideas which marks an age of
revolution was in full course; but in what forms the
new order was to be moulded, through what processes
Russia was to be brought into its new life, no one
knew. Russia was wanting in capable statesmen ; it was
even more conspicuously wanting in the class of ser-
viceable and intelligent agents of Government of the
second rank. Its monarch, Alexander II., humane and
well-meaning, was irresolute and vacillating beyond the
measure of ordinary men. He was not only devoid of
all administrative and organising faculty himself, but so
infirm of purpose that Ministers whose policy he had
accepted feared to let him pass out of their sight, lest in
SW UOLERN SVBOPE. m^a
the course of a single journey or a single interview he
should succumb to the persuasions of some rival poli-
tician. In no country in Europe was there such inco-
herence, such self-contradiction, such absence of unity
of plan and pmpose in government as in Enssia, where
all nominally depended upon a single will. Pressed
and tormented by all the rival influences that beat upon
the centre of a great empire, Alexander seems at times
to have played o£E against one another as colleagues in
the same branch of Government the representatives of
the most opposite schools of action, and, after assenting
to the plans of one group of advisers, to have committed
the execution of these plans, by way of counterpoise, to
those who had most opposed them. Bat, like other
weak men, he dreaded nothing so much as the reproach
of weakness or inconstancy ; and in the cloud of half-
formed or abandoned purposes there were some few to
which he resolutely adhered. Tlie chief of these, the
great achievement of his reign, was the liberation of the
serfs.
It was probably owing to the outbreak of the rero-
lution of 1S48 that the serfs had not been freed by
Nicholas. That sovereign had long under-
Berf,, uanii, stood tlio necessitv for the chanse, and in
imi. ■' , .
1847 he had actually appointed a Commis-
sion to report on tlie best means of effecting it. The
convulsions of 1848, followed by the Hungarian and the
Crimean Wars, threw the project into the background
during the remainder of Nicholas's reign ; bat if the
iK'lief of the Bussian people is well founded, the last
ISO. LIBERATION OF TSE SERFS. SSI
injunction of the dying Czar to bis Buccessor was to
emancipate ibe serfs throughout his empire. Alexander
was little capable of grappling with so tremendous a
problem himself; in the year 1859, however, be di-
rected a Commission to make a complete inquiry into
the subject, and to present a scheme of emancipation.
The labours of the Commission extended over two years;
its discussions were agitated, at times violent. That
serfage must sooner or later be abolished all knew ; the
points on which the Commission was divided were the
bestowal of land on the peasants and the regulation
of ihe viUage-eommnnity. European history afforded
abundant precedents in emancipation, and under an
infinite variety of detail three types of the process of
enfranchisement were clearly distinguishable from one
another. Maria Theresa, in liberating the serf, had
required him to continue to render a fixed amount of
labour to his lord, and had given him on this condition
fixity of tenure in the land he occupied ; the Prussian
reformers had made a division of the land between the
peasant aad the lord, and extinguished all labour-dues ;
Napoleon, in enfranchising the serfs in the Duchy of
Warsaw, had simply tamed them into free men, leaving
the terms of their occupation of land to be settled by
arrangement or free contract with their former lords.
This example had been followed in the Baltic Provinces
of Bussia itself by Alexander I. Of the three modes
of emancipation, that based on free contract had
produced the worst results for the peasant ; and
though many of the Bussian landowners and their
332 GOVERN SUSOPS. tM.
representatives in the Commission protested against a
division of the land between themselves and their serfs
as an act of agrarian revolution and spoliation, there were
men in high office, and some few among the proprietors,
who resolutely and successfully fought for the principle
of independent ownership hy the peasants. The lead-
ing spirit in this great work appears to have been
Nicholas Milutine, Adjunct of. the Minister of the
Interior, Lanskoi. Milutine, who had drawn up the
Municipal Charta of St. Fetersbui^, was distrosted by
the Czar as a restless and uncompromising reformer.
It was uncertain from day to day whether the views of
the Ministry of the Interior or those of the territorial
aristocracy would prevail; ultimately, however, under
instructions from the Palace, the Commission accepted
not only the principle of the division of the land, but
the system of communal self-government by the peasants
themselves. The determination of the amount of land
to be held by the peasants of a commune and of th6 fixed
rent to be paid to the lord was left in the first instance
to private agreement ; but where such agreement was
not reached, the State, throngh arbiters elected at local
assemblies of the nobles, decided the matter itself.
The rent once fixed, the State enabled the commune to
redeem it by advancing a capital sum to be -recouped
by a quit-rent to the State extending over forty-nine
years. The Ukase of the Czar converting twenty-five '
millions of serfs into free proprietors, the greatest act
of legislation of modern times, was signed on the 3rd
of March, 1861, and within the next few weeks was
Bo. LIBERATION OF TSB BEBF3. 333
read in every church of the Russian Empire. It was a
strange comment on the system of government in
Russia that in the very month in which the edict was
published both Lanskoi and MUutine, who had been its
principal authors, were removed from their posts. The
Czar feared to leave them in power to superintend the
actual execution of the law which they had inspired.
In supporting them up to the final stage of its enact-
ment Alexander had struggled against misgivings of
bis own, and against influences of vast strength alike
at the Court, within the Government, and in the Pro-
vinces. With the completion of the Edict of Emanci-
pation bis power of resistance was exhausted, and its
execution was committed by him to those who had been
its opponents. That some of the evils which have
mingled with the good in Russian enfranchisement
might have been less bad the Czar resolutely stood by
the authors of reform and allowed them to complete
their work in accordance with their own designs and
Convictions, is scarcely open to doubt.*
It had been the belief of educated men in Russia
that the emancipation of the serf would be but the first
of aseries of great organic changes, bringing f,aMai,im.
their country more nearly to the political and '**'■
social level of its European neighbours. This belief was
not fulfilled. Work of importance was done in the re-
constniction of the judicial system of Russia, but in the
other reforms expected little was accomplished. An
* Oelestin, Bnaslaiid, p. 3, Leroy-Beftolien, L'Empire dei Tmra,
i.400. Homme d'etat Buasa, p. 73, WallaM, KIlaBi^ p. ^(85. O'^k
834 XODEBN EUBOPa. Mt-O.
msniredioa which broke out in Poland at the heginning
of 1863 diverted the enei^es of the Q-ovemment from all
other objects ; and in the overpowering oatburst of Bns-
eian patriotism and national feeling which it excited,
domestic reforms, no less than the ideals of Western
civilisation, lost their interest. The establishment of
Italian independence, coinciding in time with the general
nnsettlement and expectation of change which marked
the first years of Alexander's reign, had stirred once
more the ill-fated hopes of the Polish national leaders.
From the beginning of the year 1861 Warsaw was the
Bcene of repeated tumnlts. The Czar was inclined,
within certain limits, to a policy of conciliation. The
separate Legislature and separate army which Poland
had possessed from 1815 to 1830 he was determined
not to restore ; but he was willing to give Poland
a large degree of administrative autonomy, to confide
the principal offices in its Government to natives, and
generally to relax something of that close -union with
Kussia which had been enforced by Nicholas since the
rebellion of 1831. But the concessions of the Czar,
accompanied as they were by acts of repression and
severity, were far from satisfying the demands of Polish
patriotism. It was in vain that Alexander in the
summer of 1862 sent his brother Constantine as Viceroy
to Warsaw, established a Polish Council of State, placed
a Pole. Wielopolski, at the head of the Administration,
BQperseded all the Russian governors of Polish provinces
by natives, and gave to the municipalities and the
D,a,l,zc.bvG00gIe
districts the right of electing local conncila ; these con-
cessions seemed nothing, and were in fact nothing, in
oomparison with the national independence which the
Polish leaders claimed. The situation grew worse and
worse. An attempt made upon the life of the Grand
Duke Constantine during his entrj into Warsaw was
but one among a series of similar acts which discredited
the Polish cause and strengthened those who at St.
Fetershni^ had from the first condemned the Czar's
attempts at conciliation. At length the ^Russian Gov-
ernment took the step which precipitated revolt. A
levy of one in every two hundred of the population
thronghout the Empire had heen ordered in the autumn
of 1862. Instructions were sent from St. Petersburg
to the effect that in raising this levy in Poland
the countiy-populatioa were to he spared, and that all
persons who were known to he connected with the
disorders in the towns were to be seized as soldiers.
This terqhle sentence gainst an entire
political class was carried out, so far as ^^oSm. ju.14,
it lay within the power of the authorities,
on the night of Januaiy 14th, 1803. But hefore
the imperial press-gang surrounded the houses of
its victims a rumour of the intended hlow had gone
abroad. In the preceding hours, and during the night
of the 14th, thousands fled from Warsaw and the other
Polish towns into the forests. There they formed
themselves into armed hands, and in the course of the
next few days a guerilla warfare broke out wherever
^ ItoDEBS STJSOrl.
Eu.ia„ Wp, were found in ineufident *engtb »r o«
'•'-'^^e-t:. i. WHO. "ool^;Lr^
lived were the »>-oalled uoW^se, "^^"^ ood.
of thou^nds. the ^--P^f!*^: ft„^Wt n»xni-
-Sir- :Znalca«.e. On the .eut«Uty,^ -t
„. the support, of the pea^^. ^^f^^ '^l^^
„ent oould fairly reekon; mthm t^ J"^^,^ q„,.
iteelt at one. confronted hy an """"^^g^Ud
ernment whose decrees were pnnted '■^^J"^^^
by unknown hands, and whose sentences of d^* J
„«cilessly executed against those whom .t conde™^
„. enemies or traitors to the nafonal cause_ So ert-
onlinary was the secrecy which covered *» act«>n^
this National Executive, that Milutme who w^ subse
quently sent by the Czar to examine mto the affa«s ol
Mand! formed the conclusion that it had possessed
accomplices within the Imperial Government at bt
Petc^burg itself. The Polish cause relamed mdeeU
some friends in Russia even after the outbreak of the
insurrection .■ it was not until the insurrection passed
the frontier of the kingdom and wa« carried l>y the
nobles into Lithuania and Podolia that the enhre
Uussian nation took up the struggle with passionate
and vindictive ardour as one for life or death. It was
the fatal bane of Polish nationality that the days of its
• RBcEjnaki, M6moirea but Ik Poloifiie. p. 14. B. and F. St»t« Pipers
I8ii2.6a, p. 760. B ^ir-
i,z<..t,CoogIc
greatness had left it a claim apon vast territories ,
where it had planted nothing but a territorial aristo-
craey, and where the mass of population, if not actually
Bossiaiij was almost indistinguishable from the Kus-
eioDB in race and language, and belonged like them to
the Greek Church, which Catholic Poland had always
persecuted. For ninety years Lithaaoia and the border-
provinces had been incorporated with the Czar's do-
minions, and with the exception of their Polish land-
owners they were now in fact thoroughly Russian.
When therefore the nobles of these provinces declared
that Poland must be reconstituted with the limits of
1772, and subsequently took up arms in concert with
the insurrectionary Government at Warsaw, the Rqb-
sian people, from the Czar to the pfasant, felt the
struggle to be nothing less than one for the dismember-
ment or the preservation of their own country, and the
doom of Polish nationality, at least for some genera-
tions, was sealed. The diplomatic intervention of
the Western Powers on 'behalf of the constitutional
rights of Poland under the Treaty of Vienna, which
was to some extent supported by Austria, only
prolonged a hopeless struggle, and gave unbounded
popularity to Prince Gortschakoff, by whom, after a
show of courteous attention during the earlier and
still perilous stage of the insurrection, the inter-
ference of the Powers was resolutely and uncondition-
ally repelled. By the spring of 1864 the insurgents
were cnuhed or exterminated. General MuravieS, the
Governor of Lithuania, inlfiUcd his task i^inst the
838 JfODEBJ^ BUBOPa. ub-m.
muiinoofl nobles of this provinoe with anslmnking
severity, sparing neither life nor fortune so long as aa
enemy of Russia remained to be orerthrOTTD. It was
at Wilna, the Lithuanian capital, not at Warsaw, that
the terrors of Russian repression were the greatest.
Muravieff's executions may have been less numerous
than is commonly supposed; bat in the form of
pecuniary requisitions and fines he undoubtedly aimed
at nothing less than the utter ruin of a great part of
the class most implicated in the rebellion.
In Poland itself the Cz^, after some hesitation,
determined once and for all to establish a friend to
Russia in every homestead of the kingdom
wnnata by making the peasant owner of the land
on which he laboured. The insurrectionary
Government at the outbreak of the rebellion had at-
tempted to win over the peasantry by promising enact-
ments to this effect, but no one had responded to their
appeal. In the autumn of 1863 the Czar recalled
Milutine from bis enforced travels and directed him to
proceed to Warsaw, in order to study the affairs of
Poland on the spot, and to report on the measures
necessary to he taien for its future government and
organisation. Milutine obtained the assistance of some
of the men who had laboured most earnestly with him
in the enfranchisement of the Russian serfs ; and in the
course of a few weeks be returned to St. Petersburg,
carrying with bim the draft of measures which were to
change the face of Poland. He recommended on the
one band that every political institutioa separating
no AQRARIAN MEABVRSB IS POLAND. 839
Poland from the rest of tlie Empire should be swept
away, and the last traces of Polish independeQce utterly
obliterated; oq the other hand, that the peasants, as
the only class on which Bussia could hope to count in
the fotore, should be made absolute and independent
owners of the land they occupied. Prince
Gfortschakoff, who had still some reeard for »«mrt.ta
the opinion of Western Europe, and possibly
some sympathy for the Polish aristocracy, resisted this
daring policy; but the Czar accepted Milutine's counsel,
and gave him a free hand in the execution of his
agrarian scheme. The division of the land between the
nobles and the peasants was accordingly carried out by
Milutine's own ofBcers under conditions very different
from those adopted in Russia. The whole strength of the
Government was thrown on to the aide of the peasant and
against the noble. Though the population was denser in
Poland than in Bussia, the peasant received on an average
fonr times as much land ; the compensation made to the
lords (which was paid in bonds which immediately fell
to half their nominal value) was raised not by quit-rents
on the peasants* lands alone, as in Bussia, but by a
genera! land-tax fallit^ equally on the land left to the
lords, who had thus to pay a great part of their own
compensation : above all, the questions in dispute were
settled, not as in Bussia by arbiters elected at local
assemblies of the nobles, but by officers of the Crown.
Moreover, the division of landed property was not made
once and for all, as in Bussia, but the woods and
pastures remuning to the lords continued subject to
SM MODEBIT BUBOPS. UM
ondefiiied comnioii-nghts of the peasants. These com-
mon-rights were deliberately left unsettled in order
that a scarce of contention might always be present
between the greater and the lesser proprietors, and that
the latter might continue to look to the Eussian Gov-
ernment as the protector or extender of their interests.
" We hold Poland," said a Eussian statesman, " by ita
rights of common."*
Milutine, who, with all the fiery ardour of his
national and levelling policy, seems to have been a
gentle and somewhat querulous invalid, and who was
shortly afterwards struck down by paralysis, to remain
a helpless spectator of the European changes of the
next six years, had no sliare in that warfare against
the language, the religion, and the national
culture of Poland with which Russia has
pursued its victory since 1863. The public
life of Poland he was determined to Itussianise ; its
private and social life he woold probably have left
unmolested, relying on the goodwill of the great mass
of peasants who owed their proprietorship to the action
of the Czar. There were, however, politicians at Moscow^
and St. Petersburg who believed that the deep-lying
instinct of nationality would for the first time be called
into real life among these peasants by their very eleva-
tion from misery to independence, and that where
Bussia had hitherto had three hundred thousand
enemies Milutine was preparing for it six millions. It
was the dread of this possibility in the future, the
• Leroy-Beaolieii, Honuaa d'&Ut Basse, p. 2i9.
■ OOglf
apprebension that material interests might not perma-
nently vanquish the subtler forces which pass from
generation to generation, latent, if still unconscious,
where nationality itself 13 not lost, that made the
Busstan Government follow up the political destruc-
tion of the Polish noblesse bj measures directed against
Polish nationality itself, even at the risk of alienating
the class who for .the present were effectively won over
to the Czar's cause. By the side of its life-giving
and beneficent agrarian policy Russia has pursued the
odious system of debarring Poland from all means of
culture and improvement associated with the use of its
own language, and has aimed' at eventually turning the
Poles into Russians by the systematic impoverishment
an i extinction of all that is essentially Polish in thought,
in sentiment, and in expression. The work may prove
to be one not beyond its power; and no common per*
versity on the part of ita Government would be neces-
sary to turn against Russia the millions who in Poland
owe all they have of prosperity and independence to the
Czar : but should the excess of Russian propagandism,
or the hostility of Church to Church, at some distant
date engender a new struggle for Polish independence,
this struggle will be one governed by other- conditions
than those of 1831 or 1863, and Russia will, for the
first time, have to conquer on the Vistula not a class
nor a city, but a nation.
It was a matter of no small importance to Bismarck
and to Prussia that in the years 1863 and 1864 the
Court of St. Petersburg found itself confronted with
Ml UODBSS BVBOPX. mm.
aflaire of Buch seriousness in Poland. From the oppor-
tanity wliicli was then presented to him of obliging
an important neighbour, and of profiting
by that nciglibour's conjoined embarrass-
ment and goodwill, Bismarck drew full ad-
vantage. He had always regarded the Poles as a mere
nuisance in Europe, and heartily despised the Gi-ermans
for the sympathy which they had shown towards Poland
in 1848. "When the insurrection of 1863 broke out,
Bismarck set the policy of his own country in emphatic
contrast with that of Austria and the Western Powers,
and even entered into an arrangement with Bussia for
an eventual miHtary combination in case the insurgents
should pass from one side to the other of the frontier.*
Throughout the struggle with the Poles, and through-
out the diplomatic conflict with the Western Powers,
the Czar had felt secure in the loyalty of the stub-
born Minister at Berlin ; and when, at the close of
the Polish revolt, the events occurred which opened to
Prussia the road to political fortune, Bismarck received
his reward in the liberty of action given him by the
Bussian Government. The difficulties counected with
Schleswig-Hol stein, which, after a short interval of tran-
quillity following the settlement of 1853, had again
begun to trouble Europe, were forced to the very front
of Continental affairs by the death of Frederick VII.,
King of Denmark, in November, 1863. Prussia had
now at its head a statesman resolved to pursue to their
extreme limit the chances which this complication
* Halin, i. 112. TerliaudL dec Preoai. AI)geonl. iiber Folen, p. 4S,
iKUL BOSLBSWIQ-SOISTSm. 843
offered to bis own countTy ; and, more fortunate thui
hie predecessors of 1848, Bismarck had not to dread the
interference of the Czar of Bussia as the patron and
protector of the interests of the Danish court.
By the Treaty of London, signed on May 8th, 1852,
' all the great Powers, inclnding Prussia, had recognised .
the principle of the integrity of the Danish B,aitaBrfcHoi.
Mon»chy, and had pronounced Prince ""^ ******
Christian of Gliicksburg to be heir-presumptive to the
whole dominions of the reigning King. The righte of
the German Federation in Holstein were nevertheless
declared to remain unprejudiced; and in a Convention
made with Austria and Prussia before they joined in this
Treaty, King Frederick VII. had undertaken to conform
to certain rules in his treatment of Schleswig as well as
of Holstein. The Duke of Augustenburg, claimant to
the succession in Schleswig-Holstein through the male
line, had renounced his pretensions in consideration of
an indemnity paid to him by the King of Denmark.
This surrender, however, had not received the consent
of his son and of the other members of the House of
Augustenburg, nor had the German Federation, aa such,
been a party to the Treaty of London. Belying on the
declaration of the Great Powers ia favour of the in-
tegrity of the Danish Kingdom, Frederick YII. had
resumed his attempts to assimilate Schleswig, and in
some d^ree Holstein, to the rest of the Monarchy ; and
although the Provincial Estates were allowed to remain
in existence, a national Constitution was established
in October, 1855, for the entire Danish State.
344 MODB&N SUROFS. m^
Bitter complaints were made of the system of repres-
sioD and encroachraent with which the Government of
Copenhagen was attempting to extinguish German nation-
ality in the border-provinces ; at length, in November,
1858, nnder threat of armed intervention by the German
. Federation, Frederick consented to exclude Holstein
from the operation of the new Constitution. But
this did not produce peace, for the inhabitants of
Schleswig, severed from the sister-province and now
excited by the Italian war, raised all the more vigor-
ous a protest t^ainst their own incorporation with
Denmark; while in Holstein itself the Government
incurred the chai^ of unconstitutional action in fixing
the Budget without the consent of the Estates. The
German Federal Diet again threatened to resort to
force, and Denmark prepared for war. Prussia took up
the cause of Schleswig in 1861 ; and even the British
Government, which had hitherto shown far more in-
terest in the integrity of Denmark than in the rights
of the German provinces, now recommended that
the Constitution of 1855 should be abolished, and
that a separate legislation and administration should
be granted to Schleswig as well as to Holstein. The
Danes, however, were bent on preserving Schleswig
as an integral part of the State, and the Govern-
ment of King Frederick, while willing to recognise
Holstein as outside Danish territory proper, insisted
that Schleswig should be included within the uliitary
Constitution, and that Holstein should contribute a
fised share to the national ©ipepdituw, A manifesto
MM. BOHLE^WIQ-aOLSTSm. MS
to this effect, published by King Frederick on the
30th of March, 1863, was the immediate ia»rtaBtai
gronnd of the conflict now about to break "^ »»■'»«•
out between Germany and Denmark. The Diet of
Frankfort announced that if this proclamation were
not revoked it should proceed to Federal execution,
that is, armed intervention, gainst the King of Den-
mark as Duke of Holstein. Still counting upon foreign
aid OT upon the impotence of the Diet, the Danish
Government refused to change its policy, and on the
2{H}h of September laid before the Parliament at Copen-
hagen the law incorporating Schleswig with the rest of
the Monarchy tinder the new Constitution. Negotia*
tions were thus brought to a close, and on the Ist of
October the Diet decreed the long-threatened Federal
execution.*
Affairs had reached this stf^e, and the execution
had not yet been put in force, when, on the 16th of
November, King Frederick VII. died. For
a moment it appeared possible that his Fndsriekyn.,
f^' _ ' NoYBBber, ISM.
successor. Prince Christian of Gliicksburg,
might avert the conflict with Germany by withdrawing
&om the position which his predecessor had taken up.
But the Danish people and Ministry were little inclined
to give way ; the Constitution had passed through Par-
liament two days before King Frederick's death, and
on the 18th of November it received the assent of the
Dew monarch. German national feeling was now as
• PM-liMnentary Fwen, 1864^ Tgl. Wv. pjc 28, 263. HJin, BianMitck,
L 165. .
L ,i,z<,.f,GoogIf
316 MODS^f SUBOPE. us.
strongly excited on tbe question of Schlcswig-Holstein
as it had been in 1848. The general cry was that the
UDion of these provinces with Denmarlc most be treated
as at an end, and their legitimate ruler, Frederick of
Augastenburg, son of the Duke who had renoonced
hia rights, he placed on the throne. The Diet of Frank-
fort, however, decided to recognise neither of the two
rival sovereigns in Holstein until its own intervention
should have taken place. Orders were given that
a Saxon and a Hanoverian corps should enter the
country: and although Prussia and Austria had
made a secret agreement that the settlement of the
Schleswig-HoUtein question was to be conducted by
themselves independently of the Diet, the tide of
popular enthusiasm ran so high that for tbe moment
the two leading Powers considered it safer not to
obstruct tbe Federal authority, and the Saxon and
Hanoverian troops accordingly entered Hol-
tkB In Hoiitidn. steiu as mandatories of the Diet at the end
DMvnbar, ises.
of 1863. The Danish Govemment, offer-
ing no resistance, withdrew its troops across the riv^
Eider into Schleswig.
From this time the history of Gemumy is the
history of the profound and audacious statecraft and of
the overmastering will of Bismarck ; the nation, except
through its valour on the battle-field, ceases to influence
„.^^ the shaping of its own fortunes. What
"™"*" the German people desired in 1864 was
that Schlesvrig-Holstein should he attached, under a
— '— of its own, to the German Federation as it then
MM. pouor or bibkabos. u7
existed ; what Bismarck intended was that Schleswig-
Holstpein, itself incorporated more or less directly with
Prussia, should he made the means of the destruction
of the existing Federal system and of the expulsion of
Austria from Gecmany. That anotiier petty State,
bound to Prussia by no closer tie than its other
neighbours, should be added to the troop among whom
Austria found its vassaU and its Instruments, would
have been in Bismarck's eyes no gain but actual detai-
ment to Germany. The German people desired one
coarse of action ; Bismarck had determined on some-
thing totally different; and with matchless resolution
and skill he bore down all opposition of people and of
Courts, and forced a reluctant nation to the goal which
he had himself chosen for it. The first point of con-
flict was the apparent rccogiiitiun by Bismarck of the
rights of King Chrbtian IX. as lawful sovereign in
the Duchies as well as in the rest of the Banish State.
By the Treaty of London Prussia had indeed pledged
itself to this recognition ; but the German Federation
had been no party to the Treaty, and under the pressure
of a vehement national agitation Bavaria and the minor
States one after another recognised Frederick of Augus-
tenburg as Duke of Schleswig- Hoi stein. Bismarck was
accused alike by the Prussian Parliament and by the
popular voice of Germany at large of betraying Germwi
interests to Denmark, of abusing Prussia's position as a
Great Power, of Inciting the nation to civil war. In
vain he declared that, while surrendering no iota of
German rights, the Government of Berlin must recognise
348 XODBBN EUBOPS. Ml
tbose treaty-obligations with which its own legal title to
a voice in the affairs of Schleswig was intimately bound
up, and that the 'King of Prussia, not a multitude of
irresponsible and ill-informed citizens, must be the
judge of the measures by which German interests were
to be effectually protected. His words made no single
convert either in the Prussian Parliament or in the
Federal Diet. At Frankfort the proposal made by the
two leading Powers that King Christian should he re-
quired to annul the November Constitution, and that
in case of his refusal Schleswig also should be occupied,
was rejecte \, as involving an acknowledgment of the
title of Christian as reigning sovereign. At Berlin the
Lower Chamber refused the supplies which Bismarck
demanded for operations in the Duchies, and formally
resolved to resist his policy by every means at its com-
mand. But the resistance of Parliament and of Diet were
alike in vain. By a masterpiece of diplomacy Bismarck
had secured the support and co-operation of Austria in
his own immediate Danish policy, though
Aiu^Mid but a few months before he had incurred
the bitter hatred of the Court of Vienna
by frustrating its plans for a reoi^nisation of Germany
by a Congress of princes at Frankfort, and had frankly
declared to the Austrian ambassador at Berlin that if
Austria did not transfer its political centre to Pesth
and leave to Prussia free scope in Germany, it would
find Prussia on the side of its enemies ia the next
war in which it might he eng^ed.* But the
• Tnmillochberg'fdespatoliof Feb.2%1863(iiiHdia,LM),ftppM«alIj
usL PRUSSIA AND AUSTRIA. 348
democratic iand impassioned character of the fetation
in the minor States in favour of the Schleswig-Hol-
ateiners and their Augustenburg pretender had enabled
Bismarck to represent this movement to the Austrian
Govemmebt as a revolutionary one, and by a dexterous
appeal to the memories of 1848 to awe the Em-
peror's advisers into direct concert with the Court of
Berlin, as the representative of monarchical order, in
dealing with a problem otherwise too likely to be solved
by revolutionary methods and revolutionary forces.
Count Rechberg, the Foreign Minister at Vienna,
was lured into a policy which, after drawing upon
Austria a fuU share of the odium of Bismarck's Danish
plans, after forfeiting for it the goodwill of the minor
States with which it might have kept Prussia in check,
and exposing it to the risk of a European war, was to
confer upon iljs rival the whole profit of the joint enter-
prise, and to furnish a pretext for the struggle by which
Austria was to be expelled alike from Germany and
from what remained to it of Italy. But of the nature
of the toils into which he was now taking the first fatal
and irrevocable step Count Bechberg appears to have
had no suspicion, A seeming cordiality united the
Austrian and Prussian Governments in the policy of
defiance to the will of all the rest of Germany and to the
demands of their own subjects. It was to no purpose
that the Federal Diet vetoed the proposed summons to
qnotxog aetiul words uttered bj BisniBrok, Bismuok's accAont of tbe
eoDTerutioD (id, 80) tones it dowa to a demand that Austria should
sot eaaot^ oa Fraaaia'a noogmaoi jwnt-leaderBhip in Gennaii^,
850 MODMKV KmOPM. MM.
Eling^ Christian and tho proposed occnpation of Schles-
wig. Austria and I^iusia delivered an oltimatum
A,-ri«i«a ** Copenhagen demanding the repeal of the
November Constitution ; and on its rejection
their troops entered Schleswig, not as the
mandatories of the Oerman Federation, but as the
instrumenti of two independent and allied Fowere.
(Feb. 1, 1864.)
Against t^e overwhelming forces hj which they
were thns attacked the Danes conld only make a brave
but ineffectual resistance. Their first line of defence
was the Danewerke, a fortification extending east and
west towards the sea from the town of
Bohi^i^«i. Schleswig. Prince Frederick Charles, who
commanded the Prossian right, was re-
palsed in an .attack upon the easternmost part of this
work at Missunde ; the Austrians, however, carried
some positions in the centre which commanded the
defenders' lines, and the Danes fell hack upon the forti-
fied post of Duppel, covering the narrow channel which
separates the island of Alsen from the mainland. Here
for some weeks they held the Prussians in check, while
the Aastrians, continuing the march northwards, en-
tered Jutland. At length, on the 18th of April, after
several hours of heavy hombardment, the lines of
Dilppel were taken by storm and the defenders driven
across the cbannel into Alsen. Unable to pursue the
enemy across this narrow strip of sea, the Prussians
joined their allies in Jutland, and occupied the whole
of ttu Danish m^nlaod as far aa the Lfba lUord-, The
OK THB VANIBB WAS. SU
war, however, was not to be terminated without an
attempt on the part of the neutral Powers to arrive at
a settlement by diplomat^. A. Conference was opened
at London on the 20tb of April, and after three weeka
of negotiation the belligerents were induced to accept
an armistice. As the troops of the German Federation,
though unconcerned in the military operations of the
two Great Powers, were . in possession of Holstein, tbe
Federal Government was invited to take part in the
Conference. It was represented by Count Beust, Prime
Minister of Saxony, a politician who was soon to rise
to much greater eminence ; but in consequence of
the diplomatic union of Prussia and Austria the
views entertained by the Governments of the secondary
German States had now no real bearing on the course
of events, and Count Beust's earliest appearance on
the great European stage was without result, except
in its influence on his own career.*
The first proposition laid before the Conference was
that submitted by Bemstorff, the Prussian envoy, to
the effect that Schleswig-Holstein should
receive complete independence, the question London, apch,
whether King Christian or some other
prince should be sovereign of the new State being
reserved for future settlemeut. To this the Danish
envoys replied that even on the condition of personal
union with Denmark through the Crown they could
not assent to the grant of complete independence to
the Duchies. Raising their demand in consequence of
* p. ud F. SUte F^n^ I8S3-^ f . 173. Seosi, Erinnenrngen, L^j .
as xoDSBN mmoPB. am.
this refusal, and declaring that the war bad made an
end of the obligations subsisting under the Lpndon
Treaty of 1352, the two German Powers then de-
manded that Schleswig-Holstein should be completely
separated from Denmark and formed into & single
State under Frederick of Augustenburg, who in the
eyes of Germany possessed the best claim to the sac-,
cession. Lord Russell, while denying that the acts',
or defaults of Denmark could liberate Austria and*
Prussia from their engagements made with other
Powers in the Treaty of London, admitted that no
satisfactory result was likely to arise from the continued*
union of the Duchies with Denmark, and suggested
that King Christian should make an absolute cession of
Holstein and of the southern part of Schleswig, retfun-
ing the remainder in full sovereignty. The frontier-
line he proposed to draw at the River Schlei. To this
priuciple of partition both Denmark and the German
Powers assented, but it proved impossible to reach an
^freement on the frontier-line. Bemstorff, who had
at first required nearly all Schleswig, abated his de-
mands, and would have accepted a line drawn westward
from Flensburg, so leaving to Denmark at least half
the province, including the important position of DUp-
pel. The terms thus oifered to Denmark were not
unfavourable. Holstein it did not expect, and could
scarcely desire, to retain ; and the territory which
would have been taken from it in Schleswig under this
arrangement included lew districts that were not really
German. But the Government of Copenhagen, misled
DM TRBATT or YiamrJL 8&3
bj the support given to it at the Conference by England
and Russia — a sapport which was one of words only —
refused to cede anythmg north of the town of Schleswig.
Even when in the last resort Lord EusseU proposed
that the frontier-line should he settled hy arbitration
_ the Danish GoTemment held &3t to its refusal, and for
the sake of a few miles of territory plunged once more
into a straggle which, if it waa not to kindle a Euro-
pean war of vast dimensions, could end only in the
ruin of the Danes. The expected help ^^^^^
failed them. Attacked and overthrown in ">«"«'••'""**•
the island of Alsen, the German flag carried to the
northern extremity of their mainland, they were com-
pelled to make peace on their enemies* terms. Hostilities
were brought to a close by the signature of Preliminaries
On the Ist of August j and by the Treaty of Vienna,
concluded on the 30th of October, 1864, ,.„. ^y.
King Christian ceded his rights in the °°*-**''^-
whole of Schleswig- Holstein to the sovereigns of Austria
and Prussia jointly, and undertook to recognise whatever
dispositions they might make of those provinces.
The British Government throughout this conflict had
played a sorry part, at one moment threatening the Ger-
many, at another using language towards the Danes which
might well be taken to indicate an intention
of lending tbem armed support. To some ^Hmpoium
extent the errors of the Cabinet were due to
the relation which existed between Great Britain and
Kapoleon III. It had up to this time been considered
both at London and at Paris that the Allies of the
8S4 xoDJiJUT smorn M^
Crimea had still certam common interesf» in Europe ;
and in the unsnocessful intervention at St. PetersbnTg
on behalf of Poland in 1863 the British and French
Governments had at first gone hand in hand. But
behind every step openly taken by Napoleon III.
there was some half-formed design for promoting the
interests of bis dynasty or extending the frontiers of
France ; and if England had consented to support the
diplomatic concert at St. Petersburg by measures of force,
it would have found itself engaged in a war in which
other ends than those relating to Poland would have
been the foremost. Towards the close of the year 1863
Napoleon had proposed that a European Congresa
shonld assemble, in order to regulate not only the
affairs of Poland but all those European questions
which remained unsettled. This proposal had been
abruptly declined by the English Government; and
when in the course of the Danish war Lord Palmerston
showed an inclination to take up arms if France would
do the same, Napoleon was probably not sorry to have
the opportunity of repaying England for its rejection
of his own overtures in the previous year. He had
mo]"eover hopes of obtaining from Prussia an extension
of the French frontier either in Belgium or towards the
Rhine.* In reply to overtures fi-om London, Napoleon
• BiBmdTck'B note of Jnlj 29th, 1970, in Hahn, i. 506, dercriUng
HftpoleoD'H Belgian project, wbich dated from the time when he wu him-
mU uabasssdor at Paris in 1862, girea this as the eipl&nation of N>po-
Imiu'b policj in 1864. The Commercial Treaty with PmssU and friendly
persona] relstioos with Biainarclc also iofiiienoed Napoleon's views. Sea
Bisiuarek'a i^seoh of Feb. 21st, IS79, on this oul^eo^ in Halin, iii &9S.
UH EHrOIMft Jim FBANOa. 8SS
stated that the caase of Sc&Ioswig-Holstein to socie
extent represented the principlo of nationality, to whitih
France waa friendly, and that of all wars in which
France could engage a war with OermBi.nj would be thn
least desirable. England accordingly, if it took up annti
for the Danes, would hare been compelled to onter the war
alone ; and although at a later timo, when the war ww
orer and the victors were about to divide the spoil, thi
British and French fleets ostentatiously combined in man-
oeuvres at Cherbourg, this show of union deceived no
one, least of all the resolute and well-informed director
of affairs at Berlin. To force, and force alone, would
Bismarck have yielded. Palmerston, now sinking into
old age, permitted Lord Russell to parody his own
fierce language of twenty years back; but all the world,
except the Danes, knew that the fangs and the claws
were drawn, and that British foreigu policy had become
for the time a thing of snarls and grimaces.
Bismarck had not at first determined actually to
annex Schleswig-Holstein to Prussia. He would have
been content to leave it under the nominal ,„^y,^ ^
sovereignty of Frederick of Aogustenburg ^S^"*
if that prince would have placed the entire
military and naval resources of Scbleswig-Holstein
nnder the control of the Government of Berlin, and
have accepted on behalf of liis Duchies conditions which
Bismarck considered indispensable to Germaa nnion
nnder Prussian leadership. In the harbour of Kiel it
was net difficult to recognise the natural headquarters
of a future German fleet; the narrow strip of land
x2
SS6 UODSRK SUBOPS. mk
projecting between tlie two seas naturally saggested
the formation of a canal connecting the Baltic with the
Gennan Ocean, and such a work conld only belong to
Q«rmany at large or to its leading Power. Moreover,
as a froatier district, Schleswig-Holstein waa peculiarly
exposed to foreign attack ; certain strategical positions
necessary for its defence must therefore be handed over
to its protector. That Prussia should have united its
forces with Austria in order to win for the Schleswig-
Holsteiners the power of governing themselves as they
pleased, must have seemed to Bismarck a supposition in
the highest degree preposterous. He had taken up the
cause of the Duchies not in the interest of the inhabi-
tants but in the interest of Germany ; and by Germany
he understood Germany centred at Berlin and ruled by
the House of Hohenzollern. If therefore the Augus-
tenburg prince was not prepared to accept his throne
on these terms, there was no room for him, and the
provinces must be incorporated with Prussia itself.
That Austria would not without compensation permit
the Duchies thus to fall directly or indirectly under
Prussian sway was of course well known to Bismarck;
but so far was this from causing him any hesitation in
his policy, that from the first he bad discerned in the
Schleswig-Holstein question a favourable pretext for
the war which was to drive Austria out of Germany;
Peace with Denmark was scarcely concluded when,
at the bidding of Prussia, reluctantly supported by
Austria, the Saxon and Hanoverian troops which had
entered Holstein as the mandatories of the Federal Diet
ittt«. AVBTRIA AND PBW33IA. 857
were compelled to leave the cotmtiy. A Provisional
Government was estaUisbed under the direction of an
Austrian and a Prussian Commisaioner. Bismarck had
met the Prince of Augastenburg at Berlin some months
before, and bad formed an unfavourable opinion of
the policy likely to he adopted by bim tona-ds Prussia.
All Germany, however, was in favour of the Prince's
claims, and at the Conference of London these claims
had been supported by the Prussian envoy himself. In
order to give some appearance of formal legality to bis
own action. Bismarck bad to obtain from the Crown-
jnrists of Prussia a decision that King Christian IX. bad,
contrary to the general opinion of Germany, been the
lawful inheritor of Scbleswig-Holstein, and
that the Prince of Augustenburg bad there- aS^*S<i.,
fore no rights whatever in the Duchfes. ~ '*"'
As the claims of Christian had been transferred by the
Treaty of Vienna to the sovereigns of Austria and
Prussia jointly, it rested with them to decide who
should be Duke of Schleswig-Holsteiu, and under what
conditdons. Bismarck announced at Vienna on the
22nd of February, 1865, the terms on which he was
willing that Schleswig-Holsteiu should be conferred by
the two sovereigns upon Frederick of Augustenbui^.
He required, in addition to community of finance,
postal system, and railways, that Prussian law, including
the obligation to military service, should be introduced
into the Duchies ; that their regiments should take the
oath of fidelity to tlie King of Prussia, and that their
principal military positions should be held by Prussian
868 MODERN BUBOPS. wm.
troops. These conditioiis wotild have made Schleswig-
HoUtein in all but name a part of the Pmssiaa State :
they were rejected both by the Court of Vienna and by
Prince Frederick himself, and the population of Schlee-
wig-Holstein almost Qnanimoasly declared against them.
Both Anstria and the Federal Diet now Bupported the
Sohleswig-Holsteiners in what appeared to be a struggle
on behalf of their independence against Prussian
domination; and when the Prussian Commissioner in
Schleswig-Holstein espelled the most prominent of the
adherents of Augustenbnrg, bis Austrian colleague
published a protest declaring the act to be one of law-
less violence. It seemed that the outbreak of war
between the two rival Powers could not long be de-
layed ; but Bismarck had on this occasion moved too
rapidly for his master, and considerations relating to
the other European Powers made it advisable to post-
conmtionof poD* thc ropturc for some months. An
tam. agreement was patched up at Gastein by
which, pending an ultimate settlement, the government
of the two provinces was divided between their masters,
Austria taking the administration of Holstein, Prussia
that of Schleswig, while the little district of Laaenburg
on the south was made oyer to King William in full
sovereignty. An actual conSict between the represen-
tatives of the two rival governments at tbeir joint head-
quarters in Schleswig-Holijtein was thus averted; peace
was made possible at least for some months longer;
and the interval was granted to Bismarck which was
still required tot the education of his Sovereign in the
va. SISKABOK AT BIASJUTS. 859
policy of blood and iron, and for the completion of his
own arrangements with the enemies of Austria outside
Grermany.*
The natural ally of Prossia was Italy ; but without
the sanction of Napoleon IH. it wonid have been diffi-
cult to engage Italy in a new war. Bismarck had
therefore to gain at least the passive con- bibu»i ■!
. , BlMTttB, StBL,
cnrrence of the French Emperor in the union *88b.
of Italy and Prussia against Austria. He visited
Napoleon at Biarritz in September, 1865, and returned
with the object of bis journey achieved. The negotia-
tion of Biarritz, if truthfully recorded, would probably
givo the key to much of the European history of the
next five years. ~As at Plombi^res, the French Em-
peror acted without his Ministers, and what be asked
he asked without a witness. That Bismarck actually
promised to Napoleon III. either Belgium or any part
of the Ehenish Provinces in case of the aggrandise-
ment of Prussia has been denied by him, and is not
in itself probable. But there are understandings which
prove to be nndereitandings on one side only ; politeness
may be misinterpreted ; and the world would have
found Count Bismarck unendurable if at every friendly
meeting he had been guilty of the frankness with
which he informed the Austrian Government that its
centre of action must be transferred from Yienna to Pesth.
That Napoleon was . now scheming for an extension
of France on the north-east is certain ; that Bismarck
treated sucb rectification of the frontier as a matter for
* Hafaa, BiBmantl^ L 271, SIS. OMterrelelu Euiipf« in 1866,,^^|^.
SBO MOOBBN SUBOPS. UK
arrangemeDt is hardly to be donbted ; and if without
a distinct and written agreement Napoleon waa con-
tent to base his action on the belief that Bismarck
wonld not withhold from him bis reward, this only
proved bow great was the disparity between &e aims
which the French mler allowed himself to cherish and
his mastery of the arts hy which alone such aims were
to be realised. Napoleon desired to see Italy placed in
possession of Venice ; he probably believed at this time
that Aastria would be no unequal match for Prussia
and Italy together, and that the natural result of a
well-balanced struggle would be not only the completion
of Italian union but the purchase of French neutrality
or mediation by the cession of German territory west
of the Rhine. It was no part of the duty of Count
Bismarck to chill Napoleon's fancies or to teach bim
political wisdom. Tbe Prussian statesman may have
left Biarritz with the conviction that an attack on
Germany wonld sooner or later follow the disappoint-
ment of those hopes which he had flattered and intended
to mock; but for the present he had removed one
dangerous obstacle from his path, and the way lay free
before him to an Italian alliance if Italy itself should
choose to combine with him in war.
Since the death of Cavour the Italian Government
had made no real progress towards the attainment of
the national aims, the acquisition of Rome and Venice.
O^baldi, impatient of delay, had in 1S62
landed ^ain in Sicily and samraoned hia
followers to march with him apon Borne. But the
enterprise was resolutely condemaed by Yiotor Em-
manuel, and when Garibaldi crossed to the maioland
he fomid the King's troops in front of him at Aspro-
monte. There was an exchange of shots, and Gari-
baldi fell wounded. "He was treated with something
of the distinction shown to a loyal prisoner, and
when his wound was healed he was released from
eaptirity. His enterprise, however, and the indiscreet
comments on it made by Battazzi, who was now
in power, strengthened the friends of the Papacy
at the Tuileries, and resulted in the fall of the
Italian Minister. His successor, Minghetti, deemed it
necessary to arrive at some temporary understanding
with Napoleon on the Boman question. The presence
of French troops at Rome offended national feeling,
and made any attempt at conciliation between the
Papal Court and the ItaUan GK^Temment hopeless. In
order to procure the removal of this foreign garrison
Uinghetti was wUling to enter into engagements
which seemed almost to imply the renunciation of the
claim on Rome. By a Convention made in Septem-
ber, 1864, the Italian Government undertook not to
attack the territory of the Pope, and to oppose by
force every attack made upon it from without. Napo-
leon on his part engaged to withdraw bis troops
gradually from Borne as the Pope should organise bis
own army, and to complete the evacuation within two
years. It was, however, stipulated in an Article which
was intended to be kept secret, that the capital of
Italy should be changed, the meaning of this stipnla-
M MODBRir SUROFM. M»«
tion being that Florenee should leeeire the dignifcy
vhich by the common consent of Italy ought to have
been transferred from Turin to Some and to Bome
alone. The publication of this Article, which was
followed by riots in Turin, caused the immediate fall
of Minghetti's Oabinet. He was succeeded in office
by General La Uarmora, under whom the negotiations
with Prussia were begun which, after long uncertainty,
resulted in the alliance of 1866 and in the final
expulsion of Austria from Italy.*
Bismarck from the beginning of his Ministry
appears to have looked forward to the com-
bination of Italy and Prussia against the
common enemy ; but his plans lipened slowly. In the
spring of 1865, when aHairs seemed to be reaching s
crisis in Schleswig-Holstein, the first serious overtures
were made by the Prussian ambassador at Florence. La
Marmora answered that any definite proposition would
receive the careful attention of the Italian GoTemment,
but that Italy would not permit itself to be made a mere
instrument in Prussia's hands for the intimidation of
Austria. Such caution was both natural aud necessary
on the part of the Italian Minister ; and his reserve
seemed to be more than justified when, a few months later,
the Treaty of Gastein restored Austria and Prussia to
relations of friendship. La Marmora might now well
consider himself released from all obligations towards
the Court of Berlin : and, entering oh a new line of
policy, he sent an envoy to Vienna to ascertain if the
uoa. aOrONE AT BBBLnT. S63
Emperor would amicably eede Venetia to Haly in
return for the payment of a Yerj laxge sum of money
and the assumption by Italy of part of the Austrian
national debt. Had this transaction been effected, it
would probably have changed the course of European
history; the Emperor, however, declined to bargain
away any part of his dominions, and so tlirew Italy
once more into the camp of his great enemy. In the
meantime the disputes about Schleswig-Holstein broke
out afresb. Bismarck renewed his efforts at Florence
in the spring of 1866, with the result that
General Govone was sent to Berlin in order B«un, M«eh,
18Mf
to discuss with the Prussian Minister the
political and military conditions of an alliance. But
instead of proposing immediate action, Bismarck stated
to Oovone that the question of Schleswig-Holstein was
insufficient to justify a great war in the eyes of Europe,
and that a better cause must be put forward, namely,
the reform of the Federal system of Germany. Once
more the subtle Italians believed that Bismarck's
anxiety for a war with Austria was feigned, and that
he sought their friendship only as a means of extort-
ing from the Court of Vienna its consent to Prassia's
annexation of the Danish Duchies. There was an
apparent effort on the part of the Prussian statesman
to avoid entering into any engagement which involved
immediate action ; the truth being that Bismarck was
still in conflict with the pacific influences which sur-
rounded the King, and uncertain from day to day
whether his master would really follow him in the
as4 xoDSBxr smtopa. mm
policy of war. He sought therefore to make the joint
resort to arms dependent on some fature act, Bach as
the sammooing of a German Parliament, from which
the King of Prussia could not recede if once he should
go BO far. But the Italians, apparently not pene-
trating the real secret of Bismarck's hesitation, would
he satisfied with no such indeterminate engagement ;
' they pressed for action within a limited time ; and in
the end, after Austria had taken steps which went far
to overcome the last scruples of King William, Bis-
marck consented to fix three months as the limit
beyond which the obligation of Italy to accompany
Prussia into war should not extend. On the 8th of
^jj^t.^ April a Trealy of offensive and defensive
Afd^issi. alliance was signed. It was ^reed that
if the King of Prussia should within three months
take up arms for the reform of the Federal system
of Germany, Italy would immediately after the out-
break of hostilities declare war upon Austria. Both
Powers were to engage in the war with their whole
force, and peace was not to be made hut by common
consent, snch consent not to be withheld after Austria
should have agreed to cede Venetia to Italy and territory
with an equal population to Prussia.*
Eight months had now passed since the Bignatore
of the Convention of Gastein. The experiment of an
*La HanoorA, TTn po pib di Inoe, pp. 109, 146. Jaeini, DnoAniu,p. 154.
Bahii, L S77. In tbe first draft cxf the Treatj lialj iru reqnired to
declora war not only on Aiutria but on all Gnnnan Goremmanta which
aliunld j<nn it. King William, who had stilt some compnliction in
ealliug in Italian arms against the Fatherland, strack ont these wof^
un BISMAROK ASD AmT&LL 869
understanding with Austria, which King William had
deemed necessary, bad been made, and it had failed ;
or rather, as Bismarck expressed himself in
a candid moment, it had succeeded, inas- t^^ms-
nrnch as it had cured the King o£ hia * """
scruples and raised him to the proper point of in-
dignation against the Austrian Court. The ^ents
in effecting this happy result had been the Prince of
Augustenburg, the population of Holstein, and the
Ijiberal party throughout Qerlliany at large. In
Sehleswig, which the Convention of Gastein had banded
over to Prussia, General Manteufiel, a son of the
Minister of 1850, had summarily put a stop to every
expression of public opinion, and had threatened to
imprison the Prince if he came within his reach ; in Hol-
stein the Austrian Government bad permitted, if it had not
encouraged, the inhabitants to sgitate in favour of the
I*retender, and had allowed a mass-meeting to be held
at Altooa on the 23rd of January, where cheers were
raised for Augustenburg, and the summoning of the
Estates of Schleswig-Eolstein was demanded. This
was enough to enable Bismarck to denounce the con-
duct of Austria as an alliance with revolution. He
demanded explanations from the Government of Yieona,
and the Emperor declined to render an account of hifi
actions. Warlike preparations now begao, and on the
16th of March the Austrian Government announced
that it should refer the affairs of Schleswig-Holstein
to the Federal Diet. This was a clear departure from
the terms of the Convention of Gaateiu, and &om the
see UOPBRF EUROPE. IM.
agprcement made between Anstria and Prussia before
entering into the Danish war in 1864 that the Schles-
wig-HoIstein question should be settled by the two
Powers independently of the German Federation. King
"William waa deeply moved by such a breach of good,
faith ; tears filled bis eyes when he spoke of the con-
duct of the Austrian Emperor ; and though pacific
influences were still active around him he now began
to fall in more cordially with the warlike policy
of his Minister. 4?he question at issue between
Prussia and Austria expanded from the mere disposal
of the Duchies to the reconstitution of the Federal
system of Germany. In a note laid before the
Governments of all the Minor States Bismarck de-
clared that the time had come when Germany most
receive a new and more effective organisation, and
inquired how far Prussia could count on the support
of allies if it should be attacked by Austria or forced
into war. It was immediately after this re-opening of
the whole problem of Federal reform in Germany that
the draft of the Treaty with Italy was brought to its
final shape by Bismarck and the Italian envoy, and sent
to the Ministry at Florence for its approval.
Bismarck had now to make the best use of the three
months* delay that was granted to him. On the day
after the acceptance of the Treaty by the Italian
AuMaoffoa Govemmcnt, the Prussian representative at
v«i«.itor6. jjjg jjjgj. j,f Fiankfort handed in a proposal
for the Btmunoning of a German Parliament, to be
elected by universal soflrage. Coming from the Minister
UK AUSTRIA 0FFBB8 VENIOE. S67
who bad made Parliamentary government a mockery
in Frossia, this proposal was scarcely considered as
serious. Bavaria, as the chief of Hba secondary States,
had already expressed its willingness to enter upon the
discossion of Federal reform, but it asked that the
two leading Powers should in the meantime undertake
not to attack one aoother. Austria at once acceded to bhia
request, and so forced Bismarck into giving a similar as-
surance. Promises of disarmament were then exchanged;
but as Austria declined to stay the collection of its
forces in Venetia against Italy, Bismarck was able to
charge his adveniary with insincerity in the negotiation,
and preparations for war were resumed on both sides.
Other diflGculties, however, now came into view. The
Treaty between Prussia and Italy had been made
known to the Court of Vienna by Napoleon, whose
advice La Marmora had sought before its conclusion,
and the Austrian Emperor had thus become aware of
his danger. He now determined to sacrifice Veneti^ if
Italy's neutrality could be so secured. On the 5th of
May the Italian ambassador at Paris, Count Nigra,
was informed by Napoleon that Austria had offered
to cede Venetia to him on behalf of Victor Emmanuel
if Prance and Italy would not prevent Austria from
indemnifying itself at Prussia's expense in Silesia.
Without a war, at the price of mere inaction, Italy was
offered all that it could gain by a struggle which was
likely to be a desperate one, and which might end
in disaster. La Marmora was in sore perplexity.
Though be bad formed a joster estimate of the capacity
868 UOSSBN SUBOPB. am.
of the Fraseian army than any other statesman or
soldier in. Europe, he was thoroughly suspicions of the
intentions of the Prussian Government ; and in sanctioQ-
ing the alliance of the previous month he had done bo
half expecting that Bismarck would through the prestige
of this alliance gain for Prussia its own objects without
entering into war, and then leave Italy to reckon with
Austria as best it might. He would gladly have
abandoned the alliance and have accepted Austria's ofFer
if Italy could have done this without disgrace. But the
sense of honour was sufficiently strong to carry him
past this temptation. He declined the offer made
through Paris, and continued the armaments of Italy,
though still with a secret hope that European diplomacy
might find the means of realising the purpose of his
country without war.*
The neutral Powers were now, with various objects,
~„,j„„^f„^ bestirring themselves in favour ofaEuro-
'^•"^ pean Congress. Napoleon believed the time
to be come when the Treaties of 1815 might be finally
obliterated by the joint act of Europe. He was himself
ready to join Prussia with three hundred thousand men if
the King would transfer the Rhenish Provinces to France.
Demands, direct uid indirect, were made on Count Bis-
marck on behalf of the TuHeries for cessions of territory
of greater or less extent. These demands were neither
granted nor refused. Bismarck procrastinated ; he Bpoke
of the obstinacy of the King his master; he inquired
whether parts of Belgium or Switzerland would not better
* lift UaimorA, Vv po pill 4i Ince. p- iOi, Mubn, i, W2.
I,.,.. t.CoogIc
mi. AUSTRIA AND TSS PS0P03BD OOJTGEBSft 369
assimilate with France than a German province ; he put
off the Emperor's representatives by the assurance that
he could more conveniently arrange these matters with
the Emperor when he should himself visit Paris. On the
28th of May invitations to a Congress were issued by
Fiance, England, and Russia jointly, the objects of the
Congress being defined as the settlement of the affairs
of Scbleswig-Holstein, of the differences between Austria
and Italy, and of the reform of the Federal Consti-
tution of Germany, in so far as these affected Europe
at lai^. The invitation was accepted hy Prussia and
by Italy; it was accepted by Austria only under the
condition that no arrangement should be discussed
which should give an increase of territory or power to
one of the States invited to the Congress. This subtly-
worded condition would not indeed have excluded the
equal aggrandisement of all. It would not have rendered
the cession of Yeoetia to Italy or the annexation of
Schleswig-Holstein to Prussia impossible ; but it would
either have involved the surrender of the former Papal
territory by Italy in order that Victor Emmanuel's
dominions should receive no increase, or, in tbe alter-
native, it would have entitled Austria to claim Silesia
as its own equivalent for the augmentation of tbe
Italian K!ingdom. Such reservations would have ren-
dered any efforts of the Powers to preserve peace
QselesB, and they were accepted as tantamount to a
refasal on the part of Austria to attend the Congress.
Simultaneously with its answer to the neutral Powers,
Aastria called upon the Federal Diet to take the affairs
370 XODEBir BUBOPS. uh
of Schleswig-Hol&teio ioto its own bands, and conToked
the HoLsteiQ Estates. Biamarck thereupon declared
the Convention of G-astein to be at an end, and ordered
General ManteufTel to lead his troops into Holstein. The
Austrian commaader, protesting that he yielded only to
superior force, withdrew through Altona into Hanover.
Austria at once demanded and obtained from the Diet of
Frankfort the mobilisation of the whole of the Federal
armies. The representative of Prussia, declaring that
this act of the Diet had made an end of the ex-
isting Federal union, handed in the plan of his
Government for the reorganisation of Germany, and
quitted Frankfort. Diplomatic relations between Aus-
tria and Prussia were broken off on the 13th of June,
and on the 15th Count Bismarck demanded of the
sovereigns of Hanover, Saxony, and Hesse-Cassel, that
they should on that very day put a stop to their
military preparations and accept the Prussian scheme
of Federal reform. Negative answers being given,
Prussian troops immediately marched into these terri-
tories, and war began. Weiraar, Mecklenburg, and
other petty States in the north took part with Prussia :
all the rest of Germany joined Austria.*
The goal of Bismarck's desire, the end which he
had steadily set before himself since entering upon his
„^^,„ Ministry, was attained ; and, if his calcula-
''''°'°°" tions as to the strength of the Prussian army
were not at fault, Aiistria was at length to be expelled
Hahu, Bismarck. L 106. Habo, Zwu Jaliie,p. 60; OttAemUbM
' L30.
I i,z<..t,CoogIc
UNi QERMAN OPINION. S71
from tbe Geiman Federation by force of arms. Bat the
process hy wMch Bismarck had worked up to this result
had ranged against him the almost unanimous opinion of
Germany outside the military circles of Prussia itself
His final demand for the summoning of a Oerman
Parliament was taken as mere comedy. Tbe guiding
star of his policy bad hitherto been the dynastic in*
terest of the House of HohenzoUem ; and now, when
the Germans were to be plunged into war with one
another, it seemed as if the real object of the stru^le
was no more than tbe annexation of the Danish
Duchies and some other coveted territory to the Prussian
Kingdom. The voice of protest and condemnation rose
loud from every organ of public opinion. Even in
Prussia itself the instances were few where any spon-
taneous support was tendered to tbe Government. Tbe
Parliament of Berlin, struggling up to the end against
the all-powerful Minister, had seen its members prose-
cuted for speeches made within its own walls, and had
at last been prorogued in order that its insubordination
might not hamper the Crown in the moment of danger.
But the mere disappearance of Parliament could not
conceal the intensity of ill will which the Minister and
his policy had excited. The author of a fratricidal war
of Germans against Germans was in the eyes of many
the greatest of all criminals ; and on the 7th of May an
attempt was made by a young f an_atic to take Bismarck's
life in the streets of Berlin. The Minister owed the
preservation of his life to tbe feebleness of his assailant's
weapon and to bis own vigorous arm. But the imminence
yj .... Cooylc
373 itODEBN BUBOPS. MM.
of the danger affected King William far more than Bis-
marck himself. It Bpoke to his simple mind of super-
natural protection and aid; it stilled his donhts; and
confirmed him in the helief that Prussia was in this crisis
the instrument for working out the Almighty's will.
A few da^s before the outbreak of hostilities the
Emperor Napoleon gave publicity to his own view of
the European situation. He attributed the
MwolBon nL .
coming war to three causes: to the faulty
geographical limits of the Prussian State, to the desire for
a better Federal system in Germany, and to the neces-
sity felt by the Italian nation for securing its inde-
pendence. These needs would, he conceived, be met by
a territorial rearrangement in the north of Germany
consolidating and augmenting the Prussian Kingdom ;
by the creation of a more effective Federal union between
the secondary German States; and finally, by the in-
corporation of Venetia with Italy, Austria's position in
Germany remaining unimpaired. Only in the event of
the map of Europe being altered to the exclusive advan-
tage of one Great Power would France require an exten-
sion of frontier. Its interests lay in the preservation of
the equilibrium of Europe, and in the maintenance of
the Italian Kingdom. These had already been secured
by arrangements which would not requite Prance to
draw the sword ; a watchful hut unselfish neutrality
was the policy which its Government had determined
to pursue. Napoleon had in fact lost all control orer
events, and all chance of gaining the Rhenish ProrinceSi
from the time when he permitted Italy to enter into
nsL NJFOLEON ni. S?3
the Frassian alliance without any stipulation that France
should at its option he admitted as a third memher of
the coalition. He could not ally himself with Austria
i^inst his own creation, the Italian Kingdom; on
the other hand, he had no means of extorting oessionfl
from Prussia when once Prussia was sure of an ally
who could hring two hundred thousand men into the
field. His diplomacy had heen successful in so faa- as
it had assured Venetia to Italy whether Prussia should
be victorioos or OTerthrown, but as regarded Prance it
had landed him in absolute powerlessness. He was
unable to act on one side ; he was not wanted on
the other. Neutrality had become a matter not of
choice but of necessity ; and until the course of military
events Bhonld have produced some new situation in
Europe, France might well be watchful, bat it could
scarcely gain much credit for its disinterested part.*
Assured against an attack from the side of the
Bhine, Bismarck was able to throw the mass of the
Prussian forces southwards against Austria,
tingent which was necessary to overcome
the resistance of Hanover and Hesse-Cassel. Through
• DiKmnn de Napoleon IH., p. 456. On Hay llth, Nign, Itftlkn am-
bassador at Paris, reported that Napoleon'sidesaon the objects tobeattaiued
by a Oongreea were as followa: — Tenetis to lUij\ SUeaia to Austria;
the Daoiah Dnchies and other temtor; in North Oermanj to PmBHia;
the estaUIahment of sereral nnall States on the Bhine under French pro-
tection ; tiie dispossessed German princes to ba compensated in Ronmania.
XiaUannoTa, p. 228. Napuleon IIL was porsaing in a someffliat altered
form the (dd German polioj of the Bepnblio and the Empire — nametj,
(be bidancing of Anetria and Frnssia against one another, and the estab-
lishnient of a French protectorate OTer the group of aecondarj Statea,
874 XODEBN EUBOPS. mm.
the precipitancy of a Prassian general, who shuck
without waiting for his colleagues, the Hanoverians
gained a victory at Langensalza on the 37th of
June; but other Prussi^i regiments arrived on the
field a few hours later, and the Hanoverian army
was forced to capitulate on the next day. The King
made his escape to Austria ; the Elector of Hesse-
Cassel, less fortunate, was made a prisoner of war.
Northern Germany was thus speedily reduced to sub-
mission, and any danger of a diversion in favour of
Austria in this quarter disappeared. In Sasony no
attempt was made to bar the way to the advancing
Praesians. Dresden was occupied without resistance,
but the Saxon army marched southwards in good time,
and joined the Austrians in Bohemia. The Prussian
forces, about two hundred and fifty thousand strong,
now gathered on the Saxon and Silesian frontier, covering
the line from Pima to Landshut. They were composed
tii three armies: the first, or central, army under
Prince Frederick Charles, a nephew of the King ; the
second, or Silesian, army under the Crown Prince;
the westernmost, known as the army of the Elbe,
under General Herwarth von Bittenfeld. Against these
were ranged about an equal number of Austrians, led
by Benedek, a general who had gained great dis-
tinction in the Hungarian and the Italian cam-
paigns. It had at first been thought
CMijte^ probable that Benedek, whose forces lay
about OlmUtz, woold invade Southern
Sileeia, and the Prussian line had therefore .been
UK KONiaORATB. 875
extended far to the east. Soon, howeyer, it appeared
that the Austrians were unable to take up the offensire,
and Benedek moved westwards into Bohemia. The
Prussian Hue was now shortened, and orders were
given to the three armies to cross the Bohemian frontier
and converge in the direction of the town of Qitschin.
General Moltke.tbe chief of the staff, directed their opera-
tions from Berlin hy telegraph. The combined advance
of the three armies was execnted with extraordinary pre-
cision; and in a series o£ hatd-fought combats extending
from the 26th to the 39th of June the Austrians were
driven back upon their centre, and effective communica-
tion was established between the three invading
bodies. On the 30th the King of Prussia, with
General Moltke and Coont Bismarck, left BerUn; on
the 2nd of July they were at headquarters at Qits-
chin. It had been Benedek's design to leave a small
force to hold the Silesian army in check, and to
throw the mass of his army westwards upon Prince
Frederick Charles and overwhelm him before he could
receive help from his colleagues. This design had been
baffled by the energy of the Crown Prince's attack, and
by the superiority of the Pmssians in generalship, in
the discipline of their troops, and in the weapon they
carried ; for though the Austrians had witnessed in the
Danish campaign the effects of the Prussian breech-
loading rifle, they had not thought it necessary to adopt
a similar arm. Benedek, though no great battle had
jet been fought, saw that the campaign was lost, and
wrote to the Emperor on the Ist of July recommending
MODBBN XVSOPM.
him to make peace, for otherwiae s catastroplie waa
iaevitable. He then concentrated his army on high
ground a few miles west of Koni^ratz,
grandest acale. In spite of the losses of
the past week he could still bring about two hundred
tbonaand men into action. The three Prussian
armies were now near enongh to one another to
combine in their attack, and on the night of July 2nd
the King sent orders to the three commanders to move
against Benedek before daybreak. Prince Frederick
Charles, advancing through the village of Sadowa, was
the first in the field. For hours his divisions sustained
an unequal struggle against the assembled strength of
the Austrians. Midday passed ; the defenders now
pressed down upon their assailants ; and preparations
for a retreat had been begun, when the long-expected
message arrived that the Crown Prince waa close at hand.
The onslaught of the army of Silesia on Benedek's right,
which was accompanied by the arrival of Herwarth at the
other end of the field of battle, at once decided the day.
It was with difficulty that the Austrian commander pre-
vented the enemy from seizing the positions which would
have cut off his retreat. He retired eastwards across
the Elbe with a loss of eighteen thousand killed and
wounded and twenty -four thousand prisoners. His
army was ruined ; and ten days after the Pmssians had
crossed the frontier the war was practically at an end.*
• Oerterreioha Eampfa, ii. 341. FrusaUn SUil^ Ounfaign of 186d^
(BoBw), p. 167. Cooolc
Ml AOnoS OP ITAPOtEOlT UL W
The disaster of Koniggratz was too great to be
neutralised by the saccess of the Austrian forces in
Italy. La Marmora, who had given up his place at the
head of the Government in order to take command of
the army, crossed the Mincio at the head of a hundred
and twenty thousand men, but was defeated ^^i^aoaa-
by inferior numbers on the fatal ground of *'^^^™**^
Gustozza, and compelled to fall back on the Oglio.
This gleam of saccesB, which was followed by a naval
victory at Lissa ofi* the Istrian coast, made it easier for
the Austrian Bmperor to face the sacrifices that were
now inevitable. Immediately after the battle of
Koniggratz he invoked the mediation of IN^apoleon III.,
and ceded Yenetia to him on behalf of Italy. Napoleon
at once tendered bis good offices to the
belligerents, and proposed an armistice. DMlistim,
His mediation was accepted in principle by
the King of Prussia, who expressed hi& willingness also
to grant an armistice as soon as preliminaries of peace
were recognised by the Austrian Court. In the mean-
time, while negotiations passed between all four (Gov-
ernments, the Prussians pushed forward until tbeir
outposts came within sight of Vienna. If in pursuance
of G-eneral Moltke's plan the It-alian generals had
thrown a corps north-eastwards from the bead of the
Adriatic, and so struck at the very heart of the Austrian
monarchy, it is possible that the victors of Koniggratz
might have imposed their own terms without regard to
Napoleon's mediation, and, while adding the Italian
Tyrol to Victor Emmanuel's dominions, have completed
878 MODSBN EUEOPM. mk
the muon of Qermany nnder the Hoase of Hohenzollem
at one stroke. Bat with Hungary still intact, and the
Italian army paralysed by the dissensions of its com-
manders, prudence bade the great statesman of Berlin
content himself with the advantages which he could
reap without prolongation of the war, and without the
risk of throwing Napoleon into the enemy's camp.
He bad at first required, as conditions of peace, that
Prussia should be left free to annex Saxony, Hanover,
Hesse-Cassel, and other North German territory ; that
Austria should wholly withdraw from German affairs ;
and that all Germany, less the Austrian Provinces,
should be united in a Federation under Prussian leader-
ship. To gain the assent of Napoleon to these terms,
Bismarck hinted that France might by accord with
Prussia annex Belgium. Napoleon, however, refused
to agree to the extension of Prussia's ascendency over
all Germany, and presented a counter-project which
was in its turn rejected by Bismarck. It was finally
settled that Prussia should not be prevented from
annexing Hanover, Nassau, and Hesse-Cassel, as con-
quered territory that lay between its own Rhenish
Provinces and the rest of the kingdom; that Austria
should completely withdraw from German affairs ; that
Germany north of the Main, together with Saxony,
should be included in a Federation under Prussian
leadensliip ; and that for the States south of the
Main there should be reserved the right of entering
into some kind of national bond with the Northern
League. Austria escaped without loss of any of its
UK TEEAT7 or PRAQVa. 879
noa-Italian territorj; it also sacceeded in preserring
the existence of Saxony, which, as in 1815, the Frosaian
Gk>venunent had been most anxious to annex. Na-
poleon, in confining the Prussian Federation to the
north of the Main, and in securing by a formal stipa-
lation in the Treaty the independence of the Sonthem
States, imagined himself to have broken GI«rmany into
halves, and to have laid the foundation of a South
German League which should look to France as its
protector. On the other hand, Bismarck by his an-
nexation of HanoTer and neighbouring districts bad
added a population of four millions to the Prussian
^Kingdom, and given it a continuoos territory ; he had
forced Aostria out of the Qerman system ; he had
gained its sanction to the Fe^ol union of all Germany
north of the Meuu, and had at least kept the way open
for the later extension of this union to the Southern
States. Preliminaries of peace embodying
these conditions and recognising Prussia's Nii»i«baiB.
sovereignty in Schleswig-Holstein were
signed at Nicolsburg on the 26th of July, and formed
the basis of the definitive Treaty of Peace which was
conduded at Prague on the 23rd of August. An
Ulnsory clause, added at the instance of tk^toi
Napoleon, provided that if the population ^"^^ "•"**"
of the northern districts of Schleswig should by a free
vote express the wish to be united with Denmark, these
districts should be ceded to the Danish Kingdom.*
• EUm, L 476. Benedetti, Uft HiBaEon en Fnuse, p. 186. RenehUn,
r. 4fi7. Uaaaari, Lk Uvmon, p. 350.
•80' UODBZN SVBOPS. iw
Bavaria and the south-western allies of Aastria,
thongh their military action was of an ineSectiTe cha-
Ttesoaoiao. racter, continued in arms for some weeks
bwbmm. after the battle of Kfiniggriitz, and the
suspension of hostilities arranged at Kicolsbni^ did not
come into operation on their behalf till the 2nd of
August. Before that date their forces were dispersed
and their power of resistance broken by the Prussian
generals Falckenstein and Manteuflel in a series of
unimportant engagements and intricate maufBUvres.
The City of Frankfort, against which Bismarck seems
to have borne some personal hatred, was treated for a
while by the conquerors with eztraordinaiy and most
impolitic harshness ; in other respects the action of the
Prussian Government towards these conquered States
was not such as to render future union and friendship
difficult. All the South German GJovernments, with
the single exception of Baden, appealed to the Emperor
IN^apoleon for assistance in the negotiations which they
had opened at Berlin. But at the very moment when
this request was made and .granted Kapoleon was
himself demanding from Bismarck the cession of the
Bavarian Palatinate and of the' Hessian districts west
of the Rhine. Bismarck had only to acquaint the
King of Bavaria and the South German Ministers
with the designs of their French protector in order to re-
concile them to his own chastening, but not unfriendly,"
hand. The grandeur of a united Fatherland flashed
npon minds hitherto impenetrable by any national
ideal when it became known that Napoleon was
I8HL TRSATISS WJTS TSB BOVTBSnS BTATB8. 381
bargaining for Oppenheim and Kaiserslautem. Not only
weie the insignificant qnestioiu as to tbe war-indem-
nities to be paid to Prussia and the frontier Tillages
to be exchanged promptly settled, but by a series of
secret Treaties all the South German States
BMntTimliM
entered into an offensiTc and defensive alii- ^S'Sf""
ance with the Prussian King, and engaged
in case of war to place their entire forces at his dis-
posal and under his command. The diplomacy of Napo-
leon III. had in the end effected for Bismarck almost
more than his earlier intervention had frustrated, for
it had made the South German Courts the allies of
Prussia not through conquest or mere compulsion hat
out of regard for their own interests.* It was said by
the opponents of the Imperial Government in France,
and scarcely with exaggeration, that every error which
it was possible to commit had, in tbe course of the
year 1866, been committed by Napoleon III. One
crime, one act of madness, remained open to the
^Emperor's critics, to lash him and France into a
conflict with the Power whose union he had not been
able to prevent.
Prior to the battle of KoniggiStz, it would seem
that all the suggestions of the French Emperor re-
lating to the acqaisition of Belgium were
made to the Prussian Government through poiuuan tSt"
secret agents, and that they were ac-
tually unknown, or known by mere hearsay, to Bene-
detti, the French Ambassador at Berlin. According
• H»ha, 1 601, 605. ^
I i,z<..t, Google
8SS UODSSH SjmOPS. BM.
to Prince Bismarck, these overtures had begun as early
as 1862, when he was himself Ambassador at Parifl, and
were then made Terbally and iu private notes to
himself; they were the secret of Napoleon's neatrality
during the Danish war; and were renewed throngh
relatives and confidential i^ents of the Emperor when
the struggle with Austria was seen to be approaching.
The ignorance in which Count Benedetti was kept of
his master's private diplomacy may to some extent
explain the exb-aordinary contradictions between the
accounts given by this Minister and by Prince B!sm^x:k
of the negotiations that passed between them in the
period following the campaign of 1866, after Benedetti
had himself been charged to present the demands of the
French Government. In June, while the Ambassador
was still, as it would seem, in ignorance of what was
passing behind his back, he had informed the French
Ministry that Bismarck, anxious for the preservation
of French neutrality, had hinted' at tbe compensations
that might be made to France if Prussia should meet
with great success in the coming war. According to
the report of the Ambassador, made at the time. Count
Bismarck stated thai he would rather withdraw from
public life than cede the Rhenish Provinces with
Cologne and Bonn, but that be believed it would
be possible to gain the King's ultimate consent to
the cession of the Prussian district of Treves on the
Upper Moselle, which district, together with Lnxem*
buig or parts of Belgium and Switzerland, would give
France an adequate improvement of its frontier. The
iMi BI8MAB0K AND SENSDBTTt SSS
Ambassitdor added in his report, hj way of comioeDt. that
Count Bismarck was the only man in the kingdom who
was disposed to make any cession of Prussian territory
whatever, and that a unanimous and violent revulsion
against France would be excited by the slightest in-
dication of any intention on the part of the French
Government to extend its frontiers towards the Rhine.
He concluded his report with the statement that, after
hearing Count Bismarck's suggestions, he had brought
the discussion to a summary close, not wishing to leave
the Prussian Minister under the impression that any
scheme involving the seizure of Belgian or Swiss
territory had the slightest chance of being seriously
considered at Paris. (June 4 — 8.)
Benedetti probably wrote these last words in foil
sincerity. Seven weeks later, after the settlement of the
Preliminaries of Nicolsburg, he was ordered to demand
the cession of the Bavarian Palatinate, of jw-^^^
the portion of Hesse-Darmstadt west of ^^ff,^,
the Khine, including Mainz, and of the
strip of Prussian territory on the Saar which had been
left to France in 1814 but taken from it in 1815.
According to the statement of Prince Bismarck, which
would seem to be exaggerated, this demand was made
by Benedetti as an ultimatum and with direct threats
of war, which were answered by Bismarck in language
of equal violence. In any case the demand was un-
conditionally refused, and Benedetti travelled to Paris
in order to describe what had passed at the Prussian
headquarters. His report made such an impression
SB4 MOUERN EUBOPa. UHi
on the Emperor that the demand for cessions on the
Shine was at once abandoned, and the Foreign
Minister, Drouyn de Lhnys, who had been disposed
to enforce this by arms, was compelled to quit office.
Benedetti returned to Berlin, and now there took place
that negotiation relating to Belgium on which not
only the narratirea of the persons immediately con-
cerned, but the documents written at the time, leave
BO much that is strange and unexplained.
pjoieM, Ads. According to Benedetti, Count Bismarck
was keenly anxious to extend the German
Federation to the South of the Main, and desired with
this object an intimate union with at least one Great
Power. He sought in the iirst instance the support
of France, and offered in return to facilitate the seizure
of Belgium. The negotiation, according to Benedetti, -
failed because the Emperor Napoleon required that
the fortresses in Southern Germany should be held
by the troops of the respective States to which they
belonged, while at the same time General Manteuffel,
who had been sent from Berlin on a special mission
to St. Petersburg, succeeded in effecting so intimate a
nnion with Russia that alliance with France became
unnecessary. According to the counter-statement of
Prince Bismarck, the plan now proposed originated
entirely with the French Ambassador, and was merely
a repetition of proposals which had been made by
Napoleon during the preceding foor years, and which
were subsequently renewed at intervab by secret
agents almost down to the outbieak of the war of
1870. Prince Bismarck has stated that he dallied
with these proposals only because a direct refusal might
at aoj moment have caused the outbreak of war
between France and Prussia, a catastrophe which up
to the end he sought to avert. In any case the
negotiation with Benedetti led to no conclusion, and
was broken oS by the departure of both statesmen from
Berlin in the beginning of autumn.*
The war of 186C had beeu brought to an end with
extraordinary rapidity; its results were solid and
imposing. Venice, perplexed no longer by
its Republican traditions or by doubts of S^a^™"^
the patriotism of the House of Savoy, pre-
pared to welcome King Victor Emmanuel; Bismarck,
retaming from the battle-field of Koniggratz, found
his earlier unpopularity foi^otten in the flood of
national enthusiasm which his achievements and those
of the army had evoked. A new epoch had begun ;
the antagonisms of the past were out of date ; nobler
• Benedetti, p. 191. Hahii,!.S08; ii.32S,6.%. See &lso La Marmora'i
TTn po jnoe di Ince, p. 242, and his Segreti di Stato, p. 274. Govono's
despateliea Htronglj oonfirm tbs view tLst Bismarck was more thau a
mere passive listener to f rench schemes for the acquisition of Belgium.
That lie originstod tlio plan is not probable ; that he encoaragi'd it seems
to me qnile certun, unless various French and Italian documents
miconnected with one anotber are forgeries from beginning to cad.
On the ontbreak of the war at 1870 Bismarck published the text of
the draft-treaty dinmased in 1866 providing for an offeasivB and
defenuve alliance between France and Prussia, and the seizure of
Belginm by France. The draft waa in Benedetti's handwriting, and
written on paper of the French Embassj. Benedetti stated in answer
that he bad made the draft at Bistaarck's dictation. This might seem
Terr nnlikelj were it not known that tha draft of the Treaty between
Prnssia and Italy in 1866 was aeinally so written down l^ Barral, the
Italian Ambassador, it BlsraarcVe dictation. C<00'Mc
S8S MOBBStr SVBOPa. Ml
work now stood before tbe Pmssian people and its
TuletB than tbe perpetuation of a barren stmggld
between Crown and Parliament. By none was the
severance from the past more openly expressed than by
Bismarck himself; by none was it more bitterly felt
than by tbe old Conservative party in Prussia, wbo had
hitherto regarded tbe Minister as their own representa-
tive. In drawing up the Constitution of the North
German Federation, Bismarck remained tme to tbe
principle which he bad laid down at Frankfort before
the war, that the German people must be represented
by a Parliament elected directly by the people them-
selves. In the incorporation of Hanover, Hesse-Cassel
and the Banish Duchies with Prussia, he saw that it
would be impossible to win the new populations to a
loyal union with ' Prussia if the King's Government
coiitinued to recognise no friends but the landed aris-
tocracy and the army. He frankly declared that tbe
action of the Cabinet in raising taxes without tbe
consent of Parliament had been illegal, and asked for
an Act of Indemnity. The Parliament of Berlin
understood and welcomed the message of reconciliation.
It heartily forgave tbe past, and on its own initiative
added the name of Bismarck to those for whose services
to the State the King asked a recompense. The Pro-
gressist party, which had constituted the majority in
the last Parliament, gave place to a new combina-
tion known as tbe National Liberal party, which, while
adhering to the Progressist creed in domestic affairs.
gave its allegiance to the Foreign and the German
iM«.<i7 THE NATIONAL LIBERAIS IN PBTT88IA. 887
policy of the Utuister. Within this party many able
men who in Hanover and the other annexed territoriea
had been the leaders of opposition to their own GoTem*
ments now found a lai^r scope and a greater political
career. More than one of the colleagues of Bismarck who
had been appointed to their offices in the yeus of
conflict were allowed to pass into retirement, and their
places were filled by men in sympathy with the Na-
tional Liberals. With the expansion of Prussia and
the establishment of its leadership in a German Federal
union, the ruler of Prussia seemed himself to expand
from the instrument of a military monarchy to the
representative ci a great nation.
To Austria the battle of Kouiggratz brought a
settlement of the conflict between the Crown and Hun-
gary. The Constitution of February, 1861, H«uig«r«id
hopefully as it had worked during its first *^"'^"*
years, had in the end fallen before the steady refusal of
the Magyars to recognise the authority of a single
Parliament for the whole Monarchy. Within the
Heicbsrath itoelf the example of Hungary told as a
disintegrating force; the Poles, the Czechs seceded
from the Assembly; the Minister, Schmerling, lost his
anthority, and was forced to resign in the summer of
1865. Soon afterwards an edict of the Emperor sus-
pended the Constitution. Coont Belcredi, who took
office in Schmerling's place, attempted to arrive at an
understanding with the Magyar leaders. The Honga-
rian Diet was convoked, and was opened by the King
in person before the end of the year. Francis Joseph
Z %
188 MODEBN SUnOPS. . UK.
aoDonnced his abandonment; of the principle that
Hungary had forfeited its ancient rights by rebellion,
and asked in return that the Diet should not insist
upon regarding the laws of 1848 as still in force.
"Whatever might be the forma! validity of those laws,
it was, he urged, impossible that they should be brought
into operation unaltered. For the common affairs of
the two halves of the Monarchy there mast be some
common authority. It rested with the Diet to arrive
at the necessary understanding with the Sovereign on
this point, and to place on a satisfactory footing the
relations of Hungary to Transylvania and Croatia. As
soon as an accord should have been reached on these
subjects, Francis Joseph stated that he would complete
his reconciliation with the Magyars by being crowned
King of Hungary.
In the Assembly to which these words were ad-
dressed the majority was conoposed of men of moderate
opinions, under the leadership of Francis
Dedk. Deak had drawn up the programme
of the Hungarian Liberals in the election of 1847. He
had at that time appeared to he marked out by his rare
political capacity and the simple manliness of his
character for a great, if not the greatest, part in the
work that then lay before bis country. But the Tio-
lence of revolutionary methods was alien to his tempera-
ment. After serving in Batthydny's Ministry, he with-
drew from public life on the outbreak of war with
Austria, uid remained in retirement during the dic-
tatorship of Kossuth and the struggle of 1849. As
lati DEAK. 889
a loyal hiend to the Hapsburg dynasty, and a dear-
sighted judge of the possibilities of the time, be stood
apart while Kossath dethroned the Sovereign and
proclaimed Hungarian independence. Of the patriotism
and the disinterestedness of Deak there was never
the shadow of a doabt; a distinct political faith
severed him from the leaders whose enterprise ended
in the catastrophe which he had foreseen, and pre-
served for Hungary one statesman who could, with-
out renouncing his own past and without inflicting
humiliation on the Sovereign, stand as the mediator
between Hungary and Austria when the time for
reconciliation should arrive. Deak was little disposed
to abate anything of what he considered the just
demands of his country. It was under iiis leadcrsliip
that the Diet had in 18C1 refused to accept the Consti-
tution which established a single Parliament for the
whole Monarchy. Tiie legislative independence of
Hungary he was determined at all costs to preserve
intact ; rather than surrender this he had been willing
in 1861 to see negotiations broken off and military rule
restored. But when Francis Joseph, wearied of the
sixteen years' struggle, appealed once more to Hun-
gary for union and friendship, there was no man
more earnestly desirous to reconcile the Sovereign with
the nation, and to smooth down the opposition to the
King's proposals which arose within the ^^
Diet itself, than Deak. Under his influ- Vti^^
ence a Conunitiee was appointed to frame
the necessary basis of negotiation. On the 25th of
SM UODSRF auSOFS. wi,
June, 1866, the Committee gave in its report. It de-
clared against any Farliamentaiy nnion with the Cis-
Leithan half of the Monarchy, but consented to the
establishment of common Ifinistries for War, Finance,
and Foreign Affairs, and recommended that the Budget
necessary for these joint Ministries should be settled by
Delegations from the Hungarian Diet and from the
western Keichsrath.* The Delegations, it was proposed,
should meet separately, and communicate their views to
one another by writing. Only when agreement should
not have been thus attained were the Del^ations to
unite in a single body, in which case the decision was
to rest with an absolute majority of votes.
The debates of the Diet on the proposals of King
Francis Joseph bad been long and anxious ; it was not
until the moment when the war with Prussia was
breaking out that the Committee presented its report.
The Diet was now prorogued, but immediately after
the battle of Koniggratz the Hungarian leaders were
called to Vienna, and negotiations were pushed forward
oa the lines laid down by the Committee. It was a
matter of no small moment to the Court of
NesotlaUDIM
StomSS^ Vienna that while bodies of Hungarian
exiles had been preparing to attack the
^Empire both from the side of Silesia and of
Venice, Dedk and his friends had loyally abstained
from any communication with the foreign enemies of
the House of Hapsburg. That Hungary would now
gain almost complete independence was certdn ; the
* Begelirag der TerhaltniBae, p. i. Ansglnoli mit Ungun, pL 9.
MMT. FEDERALISM OB DUAU3U. 891
question was not so much whether there shonld be
an independent Parliament and Miniatry at Pesth as
whether there shonld not be a similarly independent
Parliament and Ministry in each of the territories of
the Crown, the Austrian Sovereign becoming the head
of a Federation instead of the chief of a single or a
dual State. Count Belcredi, the Minister at Vienna, was
disposed towards such a Federal system ; he yedB.iion«
was, however, now confronted within the °"'''™-
Cabinet by a rival who represented a different policy.
After making peace with Prussia, the Emperor called
to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Count Beust, who
had hitherto been at the head of the Saxon Government,
and who had been the representative of the German
Federation at the London Conference of 1864. Beust,
while ready to grant the Hungarians their independence,
advocated the retention of the existing Seichsrath and
of a single Ministry for all the Cis-Leithan parts of
the Monarohy. His plan, which pointed to the main-
tenance of German ascendency in the western provinces,
and which deeply offended the Czechs and the Slavic
populations, was accepted by the Emperor; Belcredi
withdrew from office, and Beast was charged, as Presi-
dent of the Cabinet, with the completion of the settle-
ment with Hungary (Feb. 7, 1867). Deak had hitherto
left the chief ostensible part in the negotiations to Count
Andrassy, one of the younger patriots of 1848, who had
been condemned to be hanged, and had setomMtb*
lived a refogee during the next ten years. ^"^
He now came to Vienna himself, and in the cowrae
S9S MODERN EUBOPB. wj.
of a few days removed the last remaining difficulties.
The King gratefully charged him with the formation of
the Hongarian Ministry under the reatored Constitution,
bnt Dedk declined alite all ofSce, honours, and rewards,
and Andrassy, who had actually been hanged in effigy,
vaa phiced at the head of the Government. The Diet,
which had reassembled shortly before the end of 1866,
greeted the national Ministry with enthusiasm. Altera-
tions in the laws of 1848 proposed in accordance with the
agreement made at Vienna, and establishing the three
common Ministries with the system of Delegations for
common affairs, were carried by large majorities.* The
abdication of Ferdinand, which throughout the
struggle of 1849 Hungary had declined to recognise,
was now acknowledged as valid, and on the Sth of
June, 1867, Francis Joseph was crowned King of Hun-
gary amid the acclamations of Pesth. The gift of money
which is made to each Hungarian monarch on his corona-
tion Francis Joseph by a liappy impulse
cnwnad. jdm distributed among the families of those who
had fallen in fighting i^ainst him in 1849.
A universal amnesty was proclaimed, no condition being
imposed on the return of the exiles but that they
should acknowledge the existing Constitution. Kossuth
alone refused to return to his country so long as a
Hapsbarg should he its King, and proudly clung to
idoas which were already those of the past.
* HuugsiT reluned a Uinistrj of N&tioiul Defence for its Reaetre
Farces, and b Finance Uinietrj for its own separate finance. Thus tba
Hinistrj of l^oreign Affain was the otij ons of the Uiree coinmoB
mnistrin wbich eoveted tbe epfire ran^ of a de|iartmMtt
The yictory of the Magyars was indeed hot too
complete. Not only were Beust and the representatives
of the western half o£ the Monarchy so over- ^ ^^
matched hy the Hungarian negotiators that *^'
in the distrihntion of the financial hardens of the
Umpire Hungary escaped with far too small a share,
hat in the more important prohlem of the relation of
the Slavic and Eoamanian populations of the Hungarian
Kingdom to the dominant race no adequate steps were
taken for the protection of these suhject nationalities.
That Croatia and Transylvania sliould he re-united with
Hnngary if the Emperor and the Magyars were ever
to be reconciled was inevitahle ; and in the case of
Croatia certain conditions were no douht imposed, and
certain local rights guaranteed. But on the whole the
non-Magyar peoples in Hungary were handed over to
the discretion of the ruliDg race. The demand of
Bismarck that the centre of gravity of the Austrian
States should be transferred from Vienna to Pesth
had indeed been brought to pass. While in the western
half of the Monarchy the central authority, still repre-
sented by a single Parliament, seemed in the succeeding
years to be altogether losing its cohesive power, and the
political life of Austria became a series of distracting
complications, in Hungary the Magyiur Government
resolutely set itself to the task of moulding into one
the nationahties over which it ruled. Uniting the
characteristic faults with the great qualities of a race
marked ont by Nature and ancient habit for domination
9Ter mon numerous but less t^gressive neighbours.
SU UODSBN SUBOFE.
the Magyars have steadily sought to the best of tbeir
power to obliterate the distinctions which make Hun-
gary in reality not one but several nations. They have
held the Slavic and the Roumanian population within
their borders with an iron grasp, but they have not
gained their affection. The memory of the Russian
intervention in 1849 and of the part then played by
Serbs, by Croats and Roumanians in crushing Magyar
independence has blinded the victors to the just claims
of these races both within and without the Hungarian
kingdom, and attached their sympathy to the hateful and
outworn empire of the Turk. But the individuality of
peoples is not to be blotted out in a day ; nor, with all
its striking advance in wealth, in civilisation, and in
military power, has the Magyar State been able to
free itself from the insecurity arising from the presence
of independent communities on its immediate frootiers
belonging to the same race as those whose taiiguagv
and nationality it seeks to repress
D,a,l,zc.bvG00gIl
i
CHAPTER VI.
NapolooD ni— Itie Uesican Expedition— Withdnnl of ths French and de«th
of Moximiliui — The Loiemburg Question— Exaqienition in Fnuioe against
Fnuaia — Aootria — Italy — Msntana— Gemujiy after ISSS — The Spnniiih
candidatare of Leopold of EohenEoUern— French declaiH.tion~BQnedetti
and King William — Withdiawal of Leopold and demand for guaranteei —
The tel^^m from Enu-^War — Eipeotod Alliances of France — ^Auatria —
Italy — pTuiaan plaui — The French anny— Caiues of French inferiority —
Weiaaenhurg — Worth — Spioharen — Bomy — Mars-l«-Tour — QraTBloHe —
Sedan— The Bapublio prochumed at Paris — Favre and Biamarck— Giego of
Faris— Oambclta at Toure— The Army of the Loire— Fall of Hetz— Fig-ht-
ing at Orieoni- Sortie of Champigny- — The Armies of tho North, of the
IioiTe, of the £a«t— Bourboki'B ruin— Capitulation of Paris and ArmiitJce—
Preliminaries of Peace — Germany— Establishment of the German Empire —
Ths Commune of Pazia — Seocoid liege- EfCeoti of the war as to Eussia and
Italy — Rome.
The repatatioD of Kapoleon III. was perhaps at its
height at the eod of the first ten years of hia reign.
His victories over Bussia and Austria had flattered
the military pride of France ; the flowing tide of com-
mercial prosperity bore witness, as it
■^ ^ •' NapolMnllL
seemed, to the blessings of a government at
once Arm and enlightened ; the reconstruction of Fans
dazzled a generation accustomed to the mean and dingy
aspect of London and other capitals before 1850, and
scarcely conscious of tlie presence or absence of real
beauty and dignity where it saw spaciousness and
brilliance. The political faults of Napoleon, the
shiftiness and incoherence of his designs, his want of
grasp on reality, bis absolute personal nullity as an
898 ItODBBX EUROPB.
administrator, were known to Bome few, bnt they bad
not been displayed to the world at large. He had
done Bome great tilings, he had conspicuously failed
in nothing. Had his reign ended before 1863, he
wonld probably have left behind him in popular
memory the name of a great ruler. But from this
time his fortune paled. The repulse of his intervention
on behalf of Poland in 1803 by the Russian Court,
his petulant or miscalculatiog inaction during the
Danish War of the following year, .showed those to be
mistaken who had imagined that the Emperor must
always exercise a controlling power in Europe. During
the events which formed the iirst stage in the con-
solidation of Germany his policy was a succession of
errors. Simultaneously with the miscarriage of his
European schemes, an enterprise which he bad uoder-
taken beyond the Atlantic, and which seriously
weakened his resources at a time when concentrated
strength alone could tell on European affairs, ended in
tragedy and disgrace.
There were in Kapoleon III., as a man of State,
two personalities, two mental existences, which blended
but ill with one another. There was the contemplator
of great human forces, the intelligent, if not deeply
penetrative, reader of the signs of the times, the
brooder through long years of imprisonment and
TheM«iicui exile, the child of Europe, to whom
'"'•°*" Germany, Italy, and England had all in
turn been nearer than his own country ; and there was
the crowned adventurer, bound by his name and
yjpOLEON in. SOT
position to gain for France something that it did
not possess, and to regard the greatness of every other
nation as an impediment to the ascendency of his
own. Kapoleon correctly judged the principle of
nationality to be the dominant force in the immediate
future of Europe. He saw in Italy and in Germany
races whose internal divisions alone had prevented
them from being the formidable rivals of France, and
yet he assisted the one nation to effect its union,
and was not indisposed, within certain limits, to
promote the consolidation of the other. That the
acquisition of Nice and Savoy, and even of the
Rhenish Provinces, could not in itself make up to
France for the establishment of two great nations on
its immediate frontiers Napoleon must have well
understood : he sought to carry the principle of ag-
glomeration a stage farther in the interests of France
itself, and to form some moral, if not political, union
of the Latin nations, which should embrace under bis
own ascendency communities beyond the Atlantic as
well as those of the Old World. It was with this
design that in the year 1862 be made the financial
misdemeanours of Mexico the pretext for an expedition
to that country, the object of which was to subvert
the native Republican Government, and to place the
Hapsburg Maximilian, as a va.ssal prince, on its
throne. England and Spain had at first agreed to
unite with France in enforcing the claims of the
Earopean creditors of Mexico ; but as soon as Napoleon
had made public bis real intentions these Powers
aw MOBBBS SXmOPB. uaMT.
withdrew their forces, and the Bmperor was left free
to cany out his plans alone.
The design of Napoleon to establish French in-
fluence in Mexico was connected with his attempt to
break up the TJuited States bj establishing the in-
dependence of the Southern Confederacy, then in
rebellion, through the mediation of the Great Powers
of Europe. So long as the Civil War in the United
States lasted, it seemed likely that Napoleon's enterprise
in Mexico would be successful MazimiliioL was placed
upon the throne, and the Bepublican leader.
psditicis. isai- Juarez, was driven into the extreme north
of the country. But with the overthrow
of the Southern Confederacy and the restoration of
peace in the United States in 1865 the prospect
totally changed. The Government of Washington
refused to acknowledge any authority in Mexico b.tt
that of Juarez, and informed Napoleon in courteous
terms that his troops must be withdrawn. Napoleon
had bound himself by Treaty to keep twenty-five
thousand men in Mexico for the protection of Maxi-
milian. He was, however, unable to defy the order
of the United States. Early in 1866 he acquainted
Maximilian with the necessities of the situation, and
with the approaching removal of the force which
alone had placed him and could sustain him on the
throne. The unfortunate prince sent his consort^
the daughter of the King of the Belgians, to Europe
to plead agunst this act of desertion; bat hei
efforts were vain, and her reason sank under the jusi
iMT. BITD OF TEE MBXIOAJ/ SXPSVITIOlf. 899
presentiment of her husband's rain. The ntmoat on
which Napoleon could venture was the postponement
of the recall of his troops till the spring
of 1867. H^ urged Maximilian to abdicate ^S^?^
before it was too late ; but the prince re-
fused to dissociate himself from his counsellors who
still implored him to remain. Meanwhile the Joarists
pressed back towards the capital from north and
south. As the French detachments were withdrawn
towards the coast the entire country feU into their
hands. The last French soldiers quitted Mexico at
the beginning of March, 1867, and on the mi,^h
15th of May, Maximilian, still lingering
at Queretaro, was made prisoner by the Bepublicans.
He had himself while in power ordered that the
partisans of Juarez should be treated not as soldiers
but as bHgands, and that when captured they should
be tried by court-martial and executed within twenty-
four boors. The same severity was applied to himself.
He was sentenced to death and shot at Queretaro on
the Idth of June.
Thus ended the attempt of Napoleon III. to
establish the influence of France and of his dynasty
beyond the seas. The doom of Maximilian excited
the compassion of Europe ; a deep, irreparable wound
was inflicted on the reputation of the man
who had tempted him to his treacherous utn-inpnt^
throne, who had guaranteed bim protection,
and at the bidding of a superior power had abandoned
bim to his rain. From this time, though the patward
400 liODXnN BUltOPS. tm.
gplendoor of the Empire was UDdimintshed, there le-
mained scarcely anything oE the personal prestige which
Kapoleon had once enjoyed in so rich a measure. He
was no longer in the eyes of Europe or of his own
country the profound, self-contained statesman in whose
brain lay the secret of coming events ; he was rather
the gambler whom fortune was preparing to desert, the
usurper trembling for the future of his dynasty and
his crown. Premature old age and a harassing bodily
ailment began to incapacitate him for personal exertion.
He sought to loosen the reins in which his despot-
ism held France, and to make a compromise with
public opinion which was now declaring against him.
And although bis own cooler judgment set little
store by any addition of frontier-strips of alien
territory to France, and he would probably have been
best pleased to pass the remainder of his reign in
uadlsturbed inaction, he deemed it necessary, after
failure in Mexico had become inevitable, to seek some
satisfaction in Europe for the injured pride of his
country. He entered into negotiations with
guaitj'" Fob— the Kinff of Holland for the cession of
khj, 1S07. "^
Luxemburg, and had gained his assent,
when rumours of the transaction reached the North
German Press, and the project passed from out the
control of diplomatists and became an affair of rival
nations.
Luxemburg, which was an independent Duchy ruled
by the Xing of Holland, had until 1866 formed a part
of the Gemiian Federation; and although Bismarck
bad not attempted to include it in his own North
German Union, Prussia retained by the Treaties of
1815 a right to garrison the fortress of Luxemburg,
and its troops were actually there in possession. The
proposed transfer of the Duchy to France excited an
outburst of patriotic resentment in the Federal Par-
liament at Berlin. The population of Luxemburg
was indeed not wholly German, and it had shown
the strongest disinclination to enter the Korth German
league ; but the connection of the Duchy with Gennany
in the past was close enough to explain the indignation
roused by Napoleon's project among politicians who
little suspected that during the previous year Bismarck
himself had cordially recommended this annexation,
and that up to the last moment be had been privy to
the Emperor's plan. The Prussian Minister, though he
did not affect to share the emotion of his countrymen,
stated that his policy in regard- to Luxemburg must
be influenced by the opinion of the Federal Parliament,
and he shortly afterwards caused it to be understood
at Paris that the annexation of the Duchy to France
was impossible. As a warning to France he had already
published the Treaties of alliance between Prussia and
the South German States, which bad been made at the
close of the war of 1868, but had hitherto been kept
secret.* Other powers now began to tender their good
offices. Count Beust, on behalf of Austria, su^ested
that Luxemburg should be united to Belgium, which
* Thej had indeed been diBOOvered by F' ench ageuU in Oemunj.
BiOthwi, L' Affaire dn Luxembonr^, p^ 7^
«S XODSSy SVBOPSL MR
in its tnm should cede a amall district; to France.
This arrangement, which would have been accepted
at Berlin, and which, by soothing the irritation pro-
duced in France by Prnssia'a successes, would possibly
have averted the war of 1870, was frustrated by the
refns^ of the King of Belgium to part with any of
his territory. !NapoleoD, disclaiming all desire for
territorial extension, now asked only for the with-
drawal of the Prussian garrison from Luxemburg;
but it was known that he was determined to enforce
this demand by arms. The Russian Government
proposed that the question should be settled by a
Conference of the Powers at London. This proposal
was accepted under certain conditions by France and
Prussia, and the Conference assembled on the 7th of
May. Its deliberations were completed in four days,
and the results were summed up in the Treaty of
London signed on the 11th. By this Treaty the
Duchy of Luxembui^ was declared neutral territory
under the collective guarantee of the Powers. Prussia
withdrew its garrison, and the King of Holland, who
continued to be sovereign of the Duchy, undertook to
demolish the fortifications of Luxemburg, and to
maintain it in the future as an open town.*
Of the politicians of France, those who even
affected to regard the aggrandisement of Prussia and
the union of Northern Germany with indifference or
satisfaction were a small minority. Among these
■ Hahn, i. 658. Bothftn, Imiemboni^, p. 246. Oomspondensen de*
K. K. Uiniet. de* Aiusern, 1868. jf. 2i. PuL Paf., 1867, toL IxzIt., p. 427.
were the Emperor, who, afber his attempts to gain a
Bhenish Province had been ba£9ed, sought to prore in
an elaborate State-paper that France had
won more than it had lost by the eitinc- ft«M»>g-in«t
tion of the C^erman Federation as es-
tablished in 1815, and by the dissolution of the
tie that had bound Austria and Prussia together as
members of this body. The events of 1S66 had, he
contended, broken ap a system devised in evil days
for the purpose of uniting Central Europe against
France, and had restored to the Continent the freedom
of alliances ; in other words, they had made it
possible for the South German States to connect them-
selves with France. If this illusion was really
entertained by the Emperor, it was rudely dispelled
by the discovery of the Treaties between Prussia
and the Sonthem States and by their publication
in the spring of 1867. But this revelation was
not necessary to determine the attitude of the great
m^ority of those who passed for the representa-
tives of independent political opinion in France.
The Ministers indeed were still compelled to
imitate the Emperor's optimism, and a few enlightened
men among the Opposition understood that France
must be content to see the Germans effect their
national unity; but the great body of unofficial
politicians, to whatever party they belonged, joined
in the hitter outcry raised at once against the
aggressive Government of Prussia and the feeble
administration at Paris, which had not found the
A A 2
4U uoDsmr ev&ops.
I to prevent, or had actually facilitated, Prussia's
successes. Thiers, who more than any one man had
by hia writings popularised the Napoleonic legend
and accustomed the French to consider themselves
entitled to a monopoly of national greatness on the
Ehine, was the severest critic of the Emperor, the
most zealous denouncer of the work which Bismarck
had effected. It was only with too much reason that
the Prussian Government looked forward to an attack
by France at some earlier or later time as almost
certain, and pressed forward the military oi^anisation
which was to give to Germany an army of unheard-of
efficiency and strength.
There appears to be no evidence that Napoleon III.
himself desired to attack Prussia so long as that Power
should strictly observe the stipulations of
p™»i.««« the Treaty of Prague which provided for
the independence of the South German
States. But the current of events irresistibly im-
pelled Germany to unity. The very Treaty which
made the river Main the limit of the North German
Confederacy reserved for the Southern States the right
of attaching themselves to those of the North by some
kind of national tie. Unless the French Kmperor was
resolved to acquiesce in the gradual development of this
federal unity until, as regarded the foreigner, the North
and the South of Germany should be a single body, he
could have no confident hope of lasting peace. To have
thus anticipated and accepted the future, to have re-
moved once and for all the sleepless fears of Prasaia by
IHM. FRANCE ANP AVBTMA. 406 .
tbe frank recognition of its right to give all Germany
effective union,- would have been aa act too great and
too wise in reality, too weak and self- renouncing in
appearance, for any chief of a rival nation. Napoleon
did not take this course ; on the other hand, not desir-
ing to attack Prussia while it remained within the
limits of the Treaty of Prt^ue, he refrained from seek-
ing alliances with the object of immediate and aggres*
sive action. The diplomacy of the Emperor during the
period from 1866 to 1870 is indeed still but imperfectly
known ; but it would appear that his efforts were directed
only to the formation of alliances with the view of
eventual action when Prussia should have passed the
limits which thtj Einpeior himself or public opinion in
Paris should, as interpreter of the Treaty of Prague,
impose upon this Power in its dealings with the South
German States.
The Governments to which Napoleon could look for
some degree of support were those of Austria and Italy.
Count Beust, now Chancellor of the Austrian Mon-
archy, was a bitter enemy to Prussia, and a
rash and adventurous politician, to whom j^^^
the very circumstance of his sudden eleva-
tion from the petty sphere of Saxon politics gave a
certain levity and unconstraint in tbe handling of great
affairs. He cherished tbe idea of recovering Austria's
ascendency in Germany, and was disposed to repel tbe
extension of Russian influence westwards by boldly
encouraging the Poles to seek for the satisfaction of
their national hopes in Galicia under the Hapsboi^
40S MODERS- SUBOPS. ■«-•.
Crown. To Count Beust France was the most natural
of all allies. On tbe other hand, the very system which
Beust had helped to establish in Hungary raised serious
obstacles against the adoption of his own policy. An-
drassy, tbe HuDgariao Minister, while sharing Benst's
hostility to Bussia, declared that his countrymen bad
no interest in restoring Austria's German conoection,
and were in fact better without it. In these circum-
stances the negotiations of tbe French and the Austrian
Emperor were conducted by a private correspondence.
The interchange of letters continued during the years
180S and 1869, and resulted in a promise made by
Napoleon to support Austria if it should be attacked by
Prussia, while the Emperor Francis Joseph promised to
assist France if it should be attacked by Prussia and
Russia together. No Treaty was made, but a general
assurance was exchanged between tbe two Emperors
that they would pursue a common policy and treat one
another's interests as their own. With the view of
forming a closer understanding the Archduke Albrecbt
visited Paris in February, 1870, and a French general
was sent to Vienna to arrange the plan of campaign in
ca.se of war with Prussia. In such a war, if undertaken
by the two Powers, it was hoped that Italy would join. *
The alliance of 1866 between Prussia and Italy had
left behind it in each of these States more
of rancour than of good will. Ija Marmora
had from tbe beginning to the end been unfortunate
* Sard. Hiatoiru Diplomatiqne, L 3S. But aee the owtbowwuj
Ijctwera Benst mud Onunont in L» Ten^M, Jan. 11 — 1^ ISiSy
tm*. StALT, 40?
in liis relations with Berlin. He had entered into the
alljance with suspicioD ; he would gladly have seen
Venetia given to Italy hy a European Congress with-
out war; and when hostilities broke out, he had dis*
regarded and resented what he considered an attempt
of the Prussian 6K>vemment to dictate to him the
military measures to be pursued. On the other hand,
the Prussians charged the Italian Government with
having deliberately held back its troops after the battle
of Custozza in pursuance of arrangements made be-
tween Napoleon and the Austrian Emperor on the
voluntary cession of Venice, and with having en-
dangered or minimised Prussia's success by enabling
the Anstrians to throw a great part of their Italian
forces northwards. There was nothing of that com-
radeship between the Italian and the Prussian armies
which is acquired on the field of battle. The personal
sympathies of Victor Emmanuel were strongly on the
side of the French Emperor ; and when, at the close
of the year 1866, the French garrison was withdrawn
from Rome in pursuance of the convention made in
September, 1864, it seemed probable that France and
Italy might soon unite in a close alliance. But in
the following year the attempts of the Garibaldians
to overthrow the Papal Government, now left without
its foreign defenders, embroiled Napoleon and the
Italian people. Napoleon was unable to defy the
clerical party in France; he adopted the language of
menace in his communications with the Italian Cabinet;
and when, in the autonan of 1867, the Garibaldians
Me UOtSSN SUBOPS. iMT.
actually invaded the Boman States, he despatched a
body of French troops under G-eneral Failiy to act in
v^tB,B, support of those of the Pope. An encounter
""' took place at Mentana on November 3rd,
in which the Garibaldians, after defeating the Papal
forces, were put to the rout by General Pailly. The
occupation of Civita Vecchia was renewed, and in the
course of the debates raised at Paris on the Italian
]0'icy of the Government, the Prime Minister, M.
Bouher, stated, with the most passionate empbasis that,
come what might, Italy should never possess itself of
Bome. " Never," he cried, " will France tolerate eueh
an outrage on its honour and ite dignity."*
The affair of Mentana, the insolent and heartless
language in which General Failiy announced his success,
the reoccupation of Boman territory by French troops,
and the declaration made by M. Bouher in the French
Assembly, created wide and deep anger
itaE^iSSr in Italy, and made an end for the time of
all possibility of a French alliance. Napo-
leon was indeed, as regarded Italy, in an evil case.
By abandoning Bome he would have turned gainst
himself and his dynasty the wbole clerical interest
in France, whose conHdenco he bad already te some
extent forfeited by his policy in 1860; on the other
hand, it was vain for him to hope for the friendsbip
of Italy whilst he continued to bar the way to the
■ BoUiui, Lft FnuiM en 1867, iL 316. BenoUiii, t. 547. Two hls-
tmrical eipressions belong to Mentana : the " NeveT," of M. Bouher, uid
"The ChosBoputa have done wonders," of Gciteral Failiy.
m»^ FRANOa Atm ITALY, 409
folfilment of the nniversal national desire. "With the view
of arriving at some compromise he proposed a European
Conference on the Roman question ; but this was re-
sisted ahove all hy Count Bismarck, whose interest it
was to keep the sore open ; and neither ' England nor
Russia showed any anxiety to. help the Pope's pro-
tector out of his difficulties. Napoleon sought by a
correspondence with Victor Emmanuel during 1 868 and
1869 to pave the way for a defensive alliance; but
Victor Bmmanuel was in reality as well as in name
a constitutional king, and probably could not, even if
he had desired, have committed Italy to engagements
disapproved by the Ministry and Parliament. It was
made clear to Napoleon that the evacuation of the Papal
States must precede any treaty of alliance between
France and Italy. Whether the Italian Government
would have been content with a return to the condi-
tions of the September Convention, or whether it made
the actual possession of Rome the price of a treaty-
engagement, is uncertain ; but inasmuch as Napulcun
was not at present prepared to evacuate Civita Vecchia, he
could aim at nothing more than some eventual concert
when the existing difficulties should have been removed.
The Court of Vienna now became the intermediary
between the two Powers who had united against it in
1859. Count Beust was free from the asso- luiyuia.
ciations which had made any approach to
friendship with the kingdom of Victor Emmanuel im-
possible for his predecessors. He entered into nego-
tiations at Florence, which resulted in the conclusion
419 MODEBN SUSOPS. iHM
of an agreement lietween the Anstrian and tbe Italian
OoTemments that thej would act together and guar-
antee one uiother's territories in the event of a war
between France and Prussia. This agreement was
made with the assent of the Emperor Napoleon, and
waa understood to be preparatory to an accord with
France itself; but it was limited to a defensive cha-
racter, and it implied that any eventual concert with
France must be arranged by the two Powers in com-
bination with one another. •
At the beginning of 1870 the Emperor Napoleon
was therefore without any more definite assurance of
support in a war with Prussia than the promise of the
Austrian Sovereign that he would assist France if at-
Tn'nttTiiiTf tacked by Prussia and Russia together, and
^™^ that he would treat the interests of France
as his own. By withdrawing his protection from Rome
Napoleon had undoubtedly a fair chance of building up
this shadowy and remote engagement into a defensive
alliance with both Austria and Italy. But perfect
clearness and resolution of purpose, as well as the steady
avoidance of all quarrels on mere incidents, were abso-
lutely indispensable to the creation and the employment
of such a league against the Power which alone it could
• Son], i 40. Hahn. i. 720. ImmnlUUlT after Uentoiw, on Nor. 17,
1867, UsEnni irrolfl to BiBnukrok and to the PruBman auibasBador it Flor-
eaee, Connt Usedom, etntiDg that Napoleon liad remdred to nutka ww
on Frasais and had proposed an aJliaoce to Tiotor Emmannel, vho liad
accepted it for the price td Some. Uandni offered to employ reroln-
tionary mesas to frnatrate this plan, and aaked for monej and arma. Bia-
niarck aboired caution, bnt did not altogether diaregard the conuniutioatjoa,
Folitioa Segrola Italiana, p. 339.
have in view ; and Prussia had now littie reason to feai
any sncb exercise of statesmanship on the part of
Napoleon. The solution of the Roman question, in
other words the withdrawal of the French garrison
from Roman territory, could proceed only from some
stronger stimulus than the declining force of Napo-
leon's own intelligence and will could now supply.
This fatal problem baffled his attempts to gain alliances ;
and yet the isolation of France was but half acknow-
ledged, but half understood ; and a host of rash, vain-
glorious spirits impatiently awaited the hour that should
call them to their revenge on Fmssia for the triumphs
in which it had not permitted France to share.
Meanwhile on the other side Count Bismarck
advanced with what was most essential in his relations
with the States of Southern Germany — the „_„._
completion of the Treaties of Alliance by **^'**
conventions assimilating the military systems of these
States to that of Prussia. A Customs-Parliament was
established for the whole of Germany, which, it was
hoped, woold be the precursor of a National Assembly
tmiting the North and the South of the Main. Bat in
spite of this military and commercial approximation,
the progress towards union was neither so rapid nor
so smooth as the patriots of the North could desire.
There was much in the harshness and self-assertion of
the Prussian character that repelled the less disciplined
communities of the South. Ultramontanism was strong
in Bavaria ; and throughout the minor States the most
advanced of the Liberals were opposed to a closer union
«U MOBEBN BUBOPS. Wp-m
with Berlin, from dislike of its absolutist traditions and
the heavy hand of its Government. Thus the tendency
known as Particnlarism was supported in Bavaria and
WOrtemberg by classes of the population who in most
respects were in antagonism to one another ; nor could
the memories of the campaign of 1866 and the oldregard
for Austria be obliterated in a day. Bismarct did not
unduly press on the work of consolidation. He marked
and estimated the force of the obstacles which too rapid
a development of his national policy would encoanter.
It is possible that he may even have seen indications
that religious and other influences might imperil the
military union which he ah-eady established, and that
he may not have been unwilling to call to his aid, as the
surest of all preparatives for national union, the event
which he had long believed to be inevitable at some
time or other in the future, a war with France.
Since the autumn of 1868 the throne of Spain had
been vacant in consequence of a revolution in which
_ General Prim had been the leading actor.
ThaSpuiA °
oudjdi^anaf j(. ^^ qq^ g^^y. ^^ discovcr a successor for
the Bourbon Isabella ; and after other can-
didatures had been vainly projected it occurred to Prim
and his friends early in 1869 that a suitable candidate
might be found in Prince Leopold of HohenzoUern-
Sigmariogen, whose elder brother had been made Prince
of Boumania, and whose father, Prince Antony, had
been Prime Minister of Prussia in 1859, The House of
Hohenzollem-Sigmaringen was sp distantly related to
tbe reigning family of Prussia that the name alone
nm^m. THE SPANISH OAIWIDATV&B. 113
preserved tlie memory of the connection ; and in actual
blood-relationship Prince Leopold was much more
nearly allied to the French Houses of Murat and
Beaaharnais. Bat the Sigmaringen family was dis-
tinctly Prussian by interest aod association, and its
chief, Antony, had not only been at the head of the
Fnissian Administration himself, hut had, it is said,
been the first to suggest the appointment of Bismarck
to the same office. The caudidatare of a Hohenzollern
might reasonably be viewed in France as an attempt to
connect Prussia politically with Spain ; and with so
much reserve was this candidature at the first handled
at Berlin that, in answer to inquiries made by Benedetti
in the spriog of 1869, the Secretary of State who
represented Count Bismarck stated on his word of
honour that the candidature had never been suggested.
The affair was from first to last ostensibly la^ated
at Berlin as one with which the Prussian Government
was wholly unconcerned, and in which Eing William
was interested only as head of the family to which
Prince Leopold belonged. For twelve months after
Benedetti's inquiries it appeared as if the project had
been entirely abandoned ; it was, however, revived in
the spring of 1870, and on the Srd of
Jidy the announcement was made at Paris o™^!"'*''
that Prince Leopold had consented to ac<
cept the Crown of Spain if the Cortes should confirm
his election.
At once there broke out in the French Press a storm
of indignation against Prossia. The organs of the
414 MOPEBN XVBOPS. mm.
Ooremment took the lead in excitiDg public opinion.
On the 6th of July the Duke of Qramont, Foreign
Minister, declared to the Legislative Body that the
attempt of a Foreign Power to place one of its Princes
on the throne of Charles V. imperilled the interests and
the honour of Fnmce, and that, if Buch a contingency
were realised, the Government would fulfil
DedMmttoB. its duty without hesitation and without
weakness. The violent and unsparing lan-
guage of this declaration, which had been drawn up Kt
a Council of Ministers under the Emperor's presidency,
proved that tlie Cabinet had determined either to humi-
liate Prussia or to take vengeance by arms. It was at
once seen by foreign diplomatists, who daring the pre-
ceding days had been disposed to assist in removing a
reasonable subject of complaint, how little waa the
chance of any peaceable settlement after such a public
challenge had been issued to Prussia in the Emperor's
name. One means of averting war alone seemed
possible, the voluntary renunciation by Prince Leopold
of the offered Crown. To obtain this renunciation
became the task of those who, unlike the French
Minister of Foreign Affoirs, were anxious to preserve
peace.
The parts that were played at this crisis by the
individuals who most influenced the Emperor Napoleon
are still but imperfectly known; but there is no doubt
ouirftf. Mate- ^^'^^ *^™ *^® beginning to the end the
"'' Duke of Gramont, with short intermission^
pressed with insane ardour for vsx. The Minisby now
UTU. TSB BPANI8H OANDIDATUSS. 416
in oflSce had been called to their places in January,
1870, after the Emperor had made certain changes in
the constitution in a Libert direction, and had pro-
fessed to tr^Lsfer the responsihilitj of power from
himself to a body of advisers possessing the confidence
of the Chamber. OUivier, formerly one of the leaders
of the Opposition, had accepted the Presidency of the
Cabinet. His colleagues were for the most part men
new to official life, and little able to hold their own
against such representatives of unreformed Imperialism
as the Duke of Gramont and the War-Minister Lebceuf
who sat beside them. Ollivier himself was one of the few
politicians in France who understood that his countrymen
must be content to see German unity established
whether they liked it or not. He was entirely averse
from war with Prussia on the question which had now
arisen ; but the fear that public opinion would sweep
away a Liberal Ministry which hesitated to go all
lengths in patriotic extravagance led him to sacrifice \kis
own better judgment, and to accept the responsibility
for a policy which in his heart he disapproved.
Gramont's rash hand was given free play. Instructions
were sent to Benedetti to seek the King of Prussia at
Ems, where he was taking the waters, and to demand
from him, as the only means of averting war, that he
shonld order the HohenzoUem Prince to revoke his
acc^tanoe of the Crown. "We are in great haste,"
Qramont added, " for we mast gain the start in case
of an unsatisfactory reply, and commence the move-
ment of troops by Saturday in order to enter apon the
Bvaacttl ua
Ki^WUliuiiBt
418 MODEBN BUBOPS. UM
eatupaigQ iu a fortQigbt. Be oa yonr guard against
an answer merely leaving the Prince of Eohenzollem
to liis fate, and disclaiming on the part of the King
any interest in his future." • '
Benedetti's first interview with the King was on the
9th of July. He informed the King of the emotion
that had been caused iu France by the
candidature of the Hohenzollem Prince ;
he dwelt on the v^ue to both countries of
the friendly relation between France and Prussia ; and.
while studiously avoiding language that might wound
or irritate the King, he explained to him the require-
ments of the Government at Paris. The King had
learnt beforehand what would be the substance of
Benedetti's communication. He had probably been
surprised and grieved at the serious consequences
which Prince Leopold's action had produced in
France ; and ^though he had determined not to sub-
mit to dictatioD . from Paris or to order Leopold to
abandon his candidature, he had already, as it seems,
taken steps likely to render the preservation of peace
more probable. At the end of a conversation with the
Ambassador, in which he asserted his complete inde-
pendence as head of the family of Hohenzollem, be
informed Benedetti that he had entered into com-
munication with Leopold and his father, and that
he expected shortly to receive a despatch from Sig-
maringen. Benedetti rightly judged that the King.
• Benodetti, U* BUBdon, p 319, Jnlf 7. QFRWOut, Xrfi Fmkm et U
Fn»«e.p.6L
mm. LEOPOLD WITSDBAW3. 417
while positively refusing to meet Gramont's demands,
was yet desiroas of finding some peaceable way out of
the difiSculty ; and the report of this interview which
he sent to Taxia was really a plea in favour of good sense
and moderation. Bat Gramont was little disposed to
accept such counsels. " I tell you plainly," he wrote
to Benedetti on the next day, " public opinion is on
fire, and will leave us behind it. We must begin ; we
wait only for your despatch to call np the three
hundred thousand men who are waiting the summons.
- Write, telegraph, somethiog definite. If the King will
not counsel the Prince of Hohenzollem to resign, well,
it is immediate war, and in a few days we are on the
Khine."
Nevertheless Benedetti's advice was not without its
influence on the Emperor and his Ministers. Napo-
leon, himself' wavering from hour to hour, now
inclined to the peace-party, and during the llth there
was a pause in the military preparations that had been
begun. On the 12th the efforts of disinterested Govern-
ments, probably also the suggestions of the King of
Prussia himself, produced their effect. A
telegram was received at Madrid from Prince ^"^ '"'' '*■
Antony stating that his son's candidature was with-
drawn. A few hours later Ollivier announced the news
in the Legislative Chamber at Pans, and exchanged
congratulations with the friends of peace, who con-
sidered that the matter was now at an end. But this
paciflc conclusion little suited either the war-party or
the Bonapartistfl of the old iype, who grudged to a
118 MODBBN BimOPB. m
Constitutional Ministry so substantial a diplomatio
success. Thej at once declared tbat the retirement of
Prince Leopold was a secondary matter, and that the
real question was what guurantees had been
■s^iutminni received from Prussia a£raiust a renewal of
danuadad. ^
the candidature. Gramont himself, in an
interview with the Prussian Ambassador, Baron Wertber,
sketched a letter which be proposed that King William
should send to the Emperor, stating that in sanction-
ing the candidature of Prince Leopold he had not
intended to offend the French, and that in associating
himself with the Prince's .withdrawal he desired that
all misunderstandings should be at au end between
the two Governments. The despatch of Baron
Werther conveying this proposition appears to have
deeply offended King William, whom it reacbed about
midday od the 1 3th. Benedetti had that morning met
the King on the promenade at Ems, and had received
from bim the promise tbat as soon as the
tbe Kin«, letter which was still on its way from
J11I7 13. _ •'
Sigmaringen should arrive he would send
for the Ambassador in order that he might communicate
its contents at Paris. The letter arrived; but Baron
Werther's despatch from Paris bad arrived before it ; and
instead of summoning Benedetti as he had promised,
the King sent one of his aides-de-camp to him with a
message tbat a written communication hod been received
from Prince Leopold confirming his withdrawal, and that
the matter was now at an end. Benedetti desired the
aide-de-camp to inform the King that he was compelled
un. BINO WILUAM AND SBNEDETTI. 419
by his instractioQS to ask for a guarantee t^inst a
renewal of the candidature. The aide-de-camp did as
he was requested, and brought back a message that the
King gave his entire approbation to the withdrawal of
the Prince of Hohenzollern, but that he could do no
more. Benedetti begged for an audience with His
Majesty. The King replied that he was compelled to
decline entering into further negotiation, and that he
bad said his last word. Though the King thus refused
any further discussion, perfect courtesy was observed on
both sides ; and on the following morning the King
and the Ambassador, who were both leaving Ems, took
leave of one another at the railway station with the
Ofiual marks of respect.
That the guarantee which the French Government
had resolved to demand would not be given was now
pepffctly certain ; yet, with the candidature of Prince
Leopold fairly extinguished, it was still possible that
the cooler heads at Paris might carry the day, and that
the Government would stop short of declaring war on a
point on which the unanimous judgment of the other
Powers declared it to be in tlie wrong. But Count
Bismarck was determined not to let the French escape
lightly from the quarrel. He had to do with an enemy
who by his own folly had come to the brink of an
aggressive war, and, far from facilitating his retreat, it
was Bismarck's policy to lure him over the p_iji_jj_-,
precipice. Not many hours after the last SJ^'eSIjbi,
message had passed between King William
and Benedetti, a telegram w^s officially published aX
B B %
OB MODEBN SUBOPX. Mm
Berlin, statiog, in terms so brief as to eonrej the
impression of an actual insult, that the King had refused
to see the French Ambassador, and had informed him
by an aide-de-camp that he had nothiDg mora to com-
municate to him.. This tel^ram was sent to the repre-
nentatives of Prussia at most of the European Courts, and
to its agents in every German capital. Karratives in-
stantly gained currency, aad were not contradicted by
the Prussian Qovernment, that Benedetti had forced
himself upon the King on the promenade at Ems, and
that in the presence of a lai^e company the Sing had
turned his back upon the Ambassador. The publication
of the alleged telegram from Ems became known in
Paris on the 14th. On that day the Council of
Ministers met three times. At the first meeting the
advocates of peace were still in the majority ; in the
afternoon, as the news from Berlin and the fictions de-
scribing the insult offered to the French Ambassador
spread abroad, the agitation in Paris deepened, and the
Council decided upon calling up the Reserves ; yet the
Emperor himself seemed still disposed for peace. It
was in the interval between the second and the third
meeting of the Council, between the hours of six
and ten in the evening, that Napoleon finally gare
w.u' d»iJfd M wj^y before the threats and importunities
'''™' of the war-party. The Empress, fanati-
cally anxious for the overthrow of a great Protestant
Power, passionately eager for the military glory which
alone could insure the Crown to her son, won the
■umpb whi(^ she ffV SQ bitterly to rue. At the third
tan. FSAUOB BBOLASSa WAS. 421
meeting of the CooDcil, held sbortlj before midnight,
the vote was given for war.
In Gennany this decision had been expected ; jet it
made a deep impression not only on the G-erman people
but on Europe at large that, when the declaration of war
was submitted to the French Legislative Body in the
form of a demand for supplies, no single voice was
raised to condemn the war for its criminality and
injustice : the arguments which were urged against
it by M. Thiers and others were that the Government
bad fixed upon a bad cause, and that the occasion was
inopportune. Whether the majority of the Assembly
really desired war is even now matter of doubt. But
the clamour of a hundred madmen within its walls.
the ravings of journalists and incendiaries, who at such
a time are to the true expression of public opinion what
the Spanish Inquisition was to the Christian religion,
paralysed the will and the understanding of less in-
fatuated men. Ten votes aloue were given in the
Assembly gainst the grant demanded for war; to
Europe at lai^e it went out that the crime and the
madness was that of France as a nation. Yet
Ollivier and many of his colleagues up to the last
moment disapproved of the war, and consented to
it only because they believed that the nation would
otherwise rush into hostilities under a reactionary
Ministry who would serve Prance worse than them-
selvra. They discovered when it was too late that the
supposed national impulse which they had thought
iiresistible was but the outcry o£ a noisy minority. Tho
ttS MODERN SUBOPS. M«i
reports of their own officers informed them that in six-
teen alone out of the eighty-seven Departments of
France was tbe war popular. In the other seventj-one
it was accepted either with hesitation or regret.*
How vast were the forces which the North German
Oonfederation could bring into the field was wdl
known to Napoleon's Government. Benedetti had
bitufona** ^^P*" ^'^ employers thoroughly infomied
'"'"'"*' of the pn^fress of the North German mili-
tary organisation ; he had warned them that the South
German States would most certainly act with the
North against a foreign assailant;' he had described
with great accuracy and great penetration the nature
of the tie that existed between Berlin and St. Peters-
burg, a tie which was close enough to secure for Prussia
the goodwill, and in certain contingeneies the armed
support, of Russia, while it was loose enough not to
involve Prussia in any Muscovite enterprise that would
briog upon it the hostility of England and Austria^
The utmost force which the iVench miUtary ad-
ministration reckoned on placing in the field at the
beginning of the campaign was two hundred and fifty
thousand men, to be raised at the end of three weeks by
about fifty thousand more. The Prussians, even without
reckoning on any assistance from Southern Germany,
and after allowing for three army-corps that might be
needed to watch Austria and Denmark, could begin the
campaign with three hundred and thirty thousand.
Army to army, the French thus stood according to the
" Sorel, Histdn DiploiDftti^ae, i. 197. ( .niii'k'
reckoning of their own War Office ontnximberecl at the
outset; but Lebceuf, f^ War-Minkter, imagined that
the Foreign Office had made Bore of alii- ^ipeowi nm.
ances, and that a great part of the Prussian ""°* ''*'™'^
Army would not be free to act on the western frontier.
Napoleon had in fact pushed forward his negotiations
with Austria and Italy from the time that war became
imminent. Count Beust, while clearly laying it down
that Austria was not bound to follow France into a
war made at its own pleasure, nevertheless felt some
anxiety lest France and Prussia should settle their
differences at Austria's expense ; moreover from the
■victory of Napoleon, asBisted in any degree by himself,
he could fairly hope for the restoration of Austria's
ascendency in Germany and the undoing AortrUp™-
of the work of 1866. It was determined *■***■
at a Council held at Vienna on the 18th of July that
Austria should for the present be neutral if Russia
should not enter the war on the side of Prussia ; but
this neutrality was nothing more than a sta^ towards
alliance with France if at the end of a certain brief
period the army of Napoleon should have penetrated
into Southern Germany. In a private despatch to
the Austrian Ambassador at Paris Count Beust
pointed out that the immediate participation of
Austria in the war would bring Russia into the
field on King William's side. " To keep Russia
neutral," he wrote, " till the season is sufficiently ad-
vance to prevent the concentration of its troops must
be at present onr object; but this neutrality is nothing
4H MODERN BUBOrB. um.
TDore than a means for arriTing at the real end of our
policy, the only means for completing our preparations
withoat exposing ourselves to premature attack hy
ProBsia or Eossia." He added that Austria had'
already entered into a negotiation with Italy with a
view to the armed mediation of the two Powers, and
strongly recomAiended the Emperor to place the Italians
in possession of Bome.*
Negotiatdons were now pressed forward between Paris,
Florence, and Vienna, for the conclusion of a triple
alliance. Of the course taken by these negotiations con-
nu(«.AuM>, tradictory accounts are given by the persons
•°*^'^' concerned in them. According to Prince
Kapoleon, Victor Emmanuel demanded possession of
Rome and this was refused to him by the French
Emperor, in consequence of which the project of alliance
failed. According to the Duke of Gramont, no more
was demanded by Italy than the return to the condi-
tions of tlie September Convention ; this was agreed to
by tbe Emperor, and it was in pursuance of this agree-
ment that the PapiJ States were evacuated by their
French garrison on the 2nd of August. Throughout
the last fortnight of July, after war had actually been
declared, there was, if the statement of Gramont is to
be trusted, a contiauous interchange of notes, projects,
and telegrams between the three Qovemments. The
difficulties raised by Italy and Austria were speedily
removed, and though some weeks were needed by these
Powers for their military preparations, Napoleon was
•Hdin.ii.69. Sorel,! 236. (^;yy,.[i^
ISM. AVBTRIA AND ITALY. m
definitely assured of their armed support in case of his
preliminary success. It was agreed that Austria and
Italy, assuming at the first the position of armed
neutrality, should jointly present . an ultimatum to
Prussia in September demanding the exact perform-
ance of the Treaty of Pr^ue, and, failing its com-
pliance with this summons in the sense understood by
its enemies, that the two Powers would immediately
declare war, their armies taking the field at latest on
the 16tb of September. Xh^-t Russia would in that
case assist Prussia was well known; but it would seem
that Count Beust feared little from his northern enemy
in an autamn campaign. The draft of the Treaty
between Italy and Austria had actually, according to
Gramont's statement, been accepted by the two latter
Powers, and received its last amendments in a nego-
tiation between the £mperor Napoleon and an Italian
envoy. Count Vimercati, at Metz. Vimercati reached
Florence with the amended draft on the 4th of August,
and it was expected that the Treaty would be signed
on the following day. When that day came it saw the
forces of the French Empire dashed to pieces.*
Preparations for a war with France bad long
occupied the general stafE at Berlin. Before the winter
of 1868 a memoir h^ been drawn up by
General Holtke, containing plans for the
concentration of the whole of the German forces, for
* FrinM NapoUon. in Berne dea Denx ICoudes, April 1, 1878;
Grunout^ in Berne de rranoe, April 17, 1878. (Signed Andreas Memaii
OUivier, L'£gUsc et I'^tat, ii 473. Sorel. L 21S.
tSt itODSBN SUROPA Ml»
the formatioD of each of the armies to be employed,
and the positions to be occupied at the outset by each
corps. On the basis of this memoir the arrangements
for the transport of each corps from its dep5fc to the
frontier had subsequently been worked out in such
minute detail that when, on the 16th of July, Xing
William gave the order for mobilisation, nothing re-
mained but to insert in the railway time-tables and
marching-ordera the day on which the movement was
to commence. This minyteness of detail extended,
however, only to that part of Moltke's plan which
related to the assembling and first placing of the
troops. The events of the campaign could not thus be
arranged and tabulated beforehand; only the general
object and design could be laid down. That the French
would throw themselves with great rapidity upon
Southern Germany was considered probable. The
armies of Baden, Wiirtemberg, and Bavaria were too
weak, the military centres of the North were too far
distant, for effective resistance to be made in this quarter
to the first blows of the invader. Moltke therefore
recommended that the Southern troops should with-
draw from their own States and move northwards to
join those of Prussia in the Palatinate or on the
Middle Eliine, so that the entire forces of Germany
should be thrown upon the flank or rear of the invader;
while, in the event of the French not thus taking the
offensive, France itself was to be invaded by Wie col-
lective strength of Germany along the line from Saar-
briicken to Landau, and its armies were to be opt off
Ml aSBltAN UOBHUBATlOn. 4811
from tlieir communications with Paris by vigorous
moTements of tbe invader in a northerly direction.*
The military o^anisation of Qermany is based on
the division of the country into districts, each of which
famishes at its own depot a small bnt complete army.
The nucleos of each such corps exists in time of peace,
with its own independent artillery, stores,
and material of war. On tbe order for
mobilisation being given, every man liable to military
Bervice, but not actually serving, joins tbe regiment
to which be locally belongs, and in a given number of
days each corps is ready to take tbe field in full strength.
The completion of each corps at its own dep6t is tbe
first stf^e in tbe preparation for a campaign. Not till
ibis is effected does the movement of troops towards tbe
frontier begin. Tbe time necessary for tbe first act of
preparation was, like that to be occupied in transport,
accurately determined by the Prussian War OtGce. It
resulted from General Moltke's calculations that, the
order of mobilisation having been given on tbe 16tb of
July, the entire army with which it was intended to
begin the campaign would be collected and in position
ready to cross tbe frontier on tbe 4th of August, if tbe
French should not have taken up the offensive before
that day. But as it was apprehended that part at least
of the French army would be thrown into Germany
before that date, the westward movement of the German
troops stopped short at a considerable distance from the
* Der Deataeh TmudeiHehe Krieg, 1870-71 (FnsBun Goietal Staff),
L72.
jSi XODSBN SUBOPS. UM
border, in order thai the troops first arriving miglit not
be exposed to the attack of a superior force before their
supports should be at hand. On the actual frontier
there was placed only the handful of men required for
reconnoitring, and for checking the enemy during the
few hours that would be necessary to guard against the
effect of a surprise.
The French Emperor was aware of the numerical
inferiority of his army to that of Prussia; he hoped,
nitFraiA however, by extreme rapidity of movement
to peuetrate Southern Germany before the
Prussian army could assemble, and so, while forcing
the Southern Governments to neutrality, to meet on the
Upper Danube the assisting forces of Italy and Austria.
It was his design to concentrate a hundred and fifty
thousand men at Metz, a hundred thousand at Stras-
burg, and with these armies united to cross the Rhine
into Baden ; while a third army, which was to assemble
at Chalons, protected the noi*th<eastem frontier against
an advance of the Prussians. A few days after the
declaration of war, while the German corps were still at
their depots in the interior, considerable forces were
massed round Metz and Strasburg. All Europe listened
for the rush of the invader and the first swift notes of
triumph from a French array beyond the Rhine; but
week after week passed, and the silence was still un-
broken. Stories, incredible to those who first heard
them, yet perfectly trae, reached the German frontieiv
stations of actual famine at the advanced posts of the
enemy, and of French soldiers made priscHieiB white
Ufa. BTATE OF THE FBSNOB ARMIES. 4S9
diggiog m potato-fields to keep themselTes alive. That
Napoleon was less ready than had been anticipated
became clear to all the world ; bat none yet imagined
the revelations which each successive day was bringing
at the headquarters of the French armies. Absence
of whole regiments that fignred in the official order of
hattle, defective transport^ stores missing or congested,
made it impossible even to attempt the inroad into
Southern Germany within the date up to which it
had any prospect of success. The design was aban-
doned, yet not in time to prevent the troops that were
hurrying from the interior from being sent backwards
and forwards according as the authorities had, or had
not, heard of the change of plan. Napoleon saw that
a Prussian force was gathering on the Middle Rhine
which it would be madness to leave on his flank ; he
ordered his own commanders to operate on the corre-
sponding line of the Lauter and the Soar, and despatched
isolated divisions to the very frontier, still uncertain
whether even in this direction he would be able to act
on the ofiensive, or whether nothing now remained to
him but to resist the invasion of France by a superior
enemy. Ollivier had stated in the Assembly that he
and his coUei^es entered upon the war with a light
heart ; he might have added that they entered upon it
with bandaged eyes. The Ministers seem actually not
to have taken the trouble to exchange explanations with
one another. Lehceuf, the War-Minister, had taken
it for granted that Qramont had made arrangements
with Austria which would compel the Prussians to ke'
4M MODERN SVBOPS. VNl
a large part of their forces in the interior. Gramont, in
forcing on the qaarrel with Prussia, and in hia nego-
tiations with Anstria, had taken it for granted that
Xiebosof could win a Beries of victories at the outset
in Southern G-ermany. The Emperor, to whom alone
the entire data of the military and the diplomatic
services of France were open, was incapable of exer-
tion or scrutiny, purposeless, distracted with pain, half-
imbecile.
That the Imperial military administration was
rotten to the core the terrible events of the next few
weeks sufficiently showed. Men were in high place
whose antecedents would have shMned the
^j^ better kind of brigand. The deficiencies of
the army were made worse by the diversion
of public funds to private necessities ; the looseness,
the vulgar splendour, the base standards of judgment
of the Imperial Court infected each branch of the public
services of France, and worked perhaps not least on those
who were in military command. But the catastrophe
of 1870 seemed to those who witnessed it to tell of
more than the vileness of an administration ; in England,
not less than in Germany, voices of influence spoke
of the doom that had overtaken the depravity of a
sunken nation ; of the triumph of simple manliness, of
God-fearing virtue itself, in the victories of the German
army. There may have been truth in this; yet it
would require a nice moral discernment to appraise the
exact d^eneracy of the French of 1870 from the French
of 1 854 who hombled Bussia, or from the French of
UMi OAVSES OP aHIOiAIT BVCOSSS. 431
1859 wbo triumphed at Solferino ; and it would need
aveiy comprebeDsire acquaintance with the lower forms
of human pleasure to judge in what degree the sinful-
ness of Paris exceeds the sinfulness of Berlin. Had the
French been as strict a race as tbe Spartans who fell at
Thermopylae, as devoat as the Tyrolese who perished
at Koni^ratz, it is quite certain that, with the num-
bers which took the field against G-ermany in 1870,
with Napoleon III. at the head of affairs, and the actual
generals of 1870 in command, the armies of France
could not have escaped destruction.
The main cause of the disparity of France and Ger-
many in 1870 was in truth that Prussia had had from
1863 to 1866 a Government so strong as to cmwofooiniui
be able to force upon its subjects its own ""™^
gigantic scheme of military organisation in defiance of tbe
votes of Parliament and of the national will. In 1866
Prussia, with a population of nineteen millions, brought
actually into the field three hundred and fifty thousand
men, or one in fifty-four of its inhabitants. Tliere was
no other government in Europe, with the possible
exception of Russia, which could have imposed upon its
subjects, without risking its own existence, so vast a
burden of military service as that implied in this strength
of the fighting array. Napoleon III. at the height of
his power could not have done so ; and when after
Koniggratz he endeavoured to raise the forces of France
to an equality with those of the rival Power by a
system which would have brought about one in
seventy of tbe population into the field, bis own
4tt UODSBIF SnSOPa. MH
nominees in the Legislative Body, nnder pressure of
poblio opinion, so weakened the scheme that the effective
numbers of the armj remained little more than they
were before. The true parallel to the Qerman victories
of 1870 is to be found in the victories of the French
Committee of Fublic Safety in 1794 and in those of the
first Napoleon. A government so powerful as to bend
the entire resources of the State to military ends will,
whether it is one of democracy run mad, or of a crowned
soldier of fortune, or of an ancient monarchy throwing
new vigour into its traditional system and policy, crush
in the moment of impacbcommunitiesof equal or greater
resources in which a variety of rival influences limit
and control the central power and subordinate military
to other interests. It was so in the triumphs of the
Reign of Terror over the First Coalition ; it was so in
the triumphs of King William over Austria and France.
But the parallel between the founders of German
nnity and the organisers of victory after 1793 extends
no farther than to the sources of their success. Ag-
gression and adventure have not been the sequels of
the war of 1870. The vnst armaments of Prussia were
created in order to establish German union under the
House of Hohenzollern, and they have been employed
for DO other object. It is the triumph of statesmanship,
and it has been the glory of Prince Bismarck, after thus
reaping the fruit of a well-timed homage to the God of
Battles, to know how to quit his shrine.
At the end of July, twelve days after the formal
declaration of war, the gathering forces of the Germans,
NNl ok TBS FBOUTIBR. 4S3
over three hundred and eighty thousand strong, were
BtiU at some distance hehind the Lauter and the Saar.
Napoleon, apparently without any clear design, had
phiced certain hodies of troops actually 'n,tiaMai
on the frontier at Forbach, WeiBSenburg, ^'^'*'
and elsewhere, while other troops, raising the whole
number to about two hundred and fifty thousajid, lay
round Metz and Strashurg, and at points between these
and the most advanced positions. The reconnoitring
of the small German detachments on the frontier was
conducted with extreme enei^y : the Frencb appear to
have made no reconnaissances at all, for when they
determined at last to discover what was facing them
at Saarbr&cten, they advanced with twenty-five thou-
sand men against one-tenth of that number. On the
2nd of Augast Frossard's corps from Forbach moved
upon Saarbriicken with the Emperor in person. The
garrison was driven out, and the town bombarded, but
even now the reconnaissance was not continued beyond
the bridge across the Saar which divides the BtuMtckm.
two parts of the town. Forty-eight hours *■*■ *"
later the alignment of the German forces in their in-
vading order was completed, and all was ready for an
offensive campaign. The central army, commanded by
Prince Frederick Charles, spreading east and west
behind Saarbriicken, touched on its right the northern
army commanded by General Steinmetz, on its left the
soathem army commanded by the Crown Prince, which
covered the frontier of the Palatinate, and included the
troops of Bavaria and Wurtemberg. The general
c c
431 MODBiar SUEOPS. IM
direction of the three armies yras thus from north-
west to south-east. As the line of invasion was to
be nearly due west, it was necessaiy that the first step
forwaids should be made by the army of the Crown
Prince in order to bring it more nearly to a level with
the northern corps in the march into France. On the
4th of August the Crown Prince crossed the Al-
satian frontier and moved against Weissenbui^. The
French General Douay, who was posted here with
about twelve thousand men, was neither reinforced nor
bidden to retire. His troops met the attack of an
enemy many times more numerous with great courage ;
but the struggle was a hopeless one, and after several
hours of severe fighting the Germans were
masters of the field. Douay fell in the
battle ; his troops frustrated an attempt made to cat
ofi their retreat, and fell back southwards towards the
corps of HcMahon, which lay about ten miles behind
them.
The Crown Prince marched on in search of his
enemy. McMahon, who could collect only forty-
five thousand men, desired to retreat until he could
gain some support; but the Emperor, tormented by
fears of the political consequences of the invasion, in-
sisted upon his giving battle. He drew up
on the hills about Worth, almost on the
spot where in 1793 Heche had overthrown the armies
of the Pirst Coalition. On the 6th of August the
leading divisions of the Crown Prince, about a hundred
thousand strong, were within striking distance. Th«
um WORTB. 435
superiority of the GermaDS in nambers was so great
that McMahon's army might apparently have been
captured or destroyed with far less loss than actually
took place if time had been given for the movements
which the Crown Prince's staff had in view, and for
the employment of his full strength. But the im-
petnosity of divisional leaders on the morning of the
6th brought on a general engagement. The resistance
of the French was of the most determined character.
"With one more army-corps — and the corps of General
Failly was expected to arrive on the field — it seemed as
if the Germans might yet be beaten back. Bat each
hour brought addition^ forces into action in the attack,
while the French commander looked in vain for ' the
reinforcements that could save him from min. At
length, when the last desperate chains of the
Cuirassiers had shattered f^ainst the fire of cannon
and needle-guns, and the vill^e of FroschwiUer, the
centre of the French position, bad been stormed house
by house, the entire army broke and fied in disorder.
Nine thoasand prisoners, thirty-three cannon, fell into
the bands of the conquerors. The Germans had lost
ten thousand men, bnt they bad utterly destroyed
McMahon's army as an organised force. Its remnuit
dis&ppeared from the scene of warfare, escaping by the
western roads in the direction of Ch&lons, where first
it was restored to some degree of order. The Crown
Prince, leaving troops behind him to beleaguer the
smaller Alsatian fortresses, marched on untroubled
through the northern Vosges, and descended into the
c c i
iH itODESN SUSOPB. tna
open country about Lnn^nlle and Nancy, unfortified
towns which could ofier no resistance to the passage of
an enemy.
On the same day that the battle of "WBiih was
fought, the leading columns of the armies of Steinmetz
and Prince Frederick Charles crossed the frontier at
Saarbriicken. Frossard's corps, on the news of the
-j,,__ defeat at Weissenhurg, had withdrawn to
"'■'■ its earlier positions between Forbach and
the frontier : it held the steep hills of Spicheren that
look down upon Saarbrucken, and the woods that flank
the high road where this passes from Germany into
France. Aj at Worth, it was not intended that any
general attack should be made on the 6th ; a delay of
twenty-four hours would have enabled the Germans to
envelop or crush Frossard's corps with an overwhelming
force. But the leaders of the foremost regiments threw
themselves impatiently upon the French whom they
found before them ; other brigades hurried up to the
sound of the cannon, until the struggle took the pro-
portion of a battle, and after hours of fluctuating
success the heights of Spicheren were carried by
successive rushes of the infantry full in the enemy's
fire. Why Prossard was not reinforced has never been
explained, for several French divisions lay at no great
distfuice westward, and the position was so strong
that, if a pitched battle was to be fought anywhere
east of Metz, few better points could have been chosen.
IJut, like Douay at Weissenhurg, Frossard was left to
struggle alone against whatever forces the Germana
unl NAFOLSON at METZ. 4S3
might throw npon him. Napoleon, who directed the
operations of tlie French armies from Metz, appears to
have been now incapable of appreciating the simplest
military necessities, of guarding against the most
obvioas dangers. Helplessness, infatuation ruled the
miserable hours.
The impression made upon Europe by the battles
of the 6th of Angost corresponded to the greatness of
their actual militaiy effects. There was an end to
all thoughts of the alliance of Austria and Italy with
France. Germany, thongh unaware of the full mag-
nitude of the perils from which it had escaped, breatlied
freely after weeks of piinful suspense ; the
very circumstance that the disproportion of 'Sj.il"
numbers on the battle-field of Worth was
still unknown heightened the joy and confidence pro-
daced by the Crown Prince's Yictory, a victory in
which the South German troops, fighting by the side
of those who had been their foes in 1866, bad borne
their full part. In Paris the consternation with which
the news of McMahon's overthrow was received was
all the greater that on the previous day reports had
been circulated -of a victory won at Landau and of the
capture of the Crown Prince with his army. The
bulletin of the Emperor, briefly narrating McMahon's
defeat and the repulse of Frossard, showed in its con-
cluding words — " All may yet be retrieved " — how pro-
foxmd was the change made in the prospects of the war
by that fitt^ day. The truth was at once apprehended.
A storm of indignation broke out against the Imperial
438 MODSKSr BUBOPB. um.
Government at Paris. The Chambers were gammoned.
Ollivier, attacked alike by the extreme Bonapartists and
by the Opposition, laid down his office. A reactionary
Ministry, headed by the Count of Palikao, was placed
in power by the Empress, a Miniijtry of the last hour
as it was justly styled by all outside it. Levies were
ordered, arms and stores accumulated for the reserve-
forces, preparations made for a siege of Paris itself. On
the 12th the Emperor gave up the command which he
had exercised with such miserable results, and appointed
Marshal Bazaine, one of the heroes of the Mexican Ex-
pedition, Gcncral-in-Chief of the Army of the Rhine.
After the overthrow of McMahon and the victory of
Nuoionat ' ''^^ GcFmons at Spicheren, there seems to
ifcw.Aog.T-is. |^^^,g heeu a period of utter paralysis in the
French headquarters at Metz. The divisions of Prince
Frederick Charles and Steinmetz did not immediately
press forward ; it was necessary to allow some days for
the ailvance of tlie Crown Prince through the Vosges;
and during these days tbe French army about Metz,
which, when concentratt'd, numbered nearly two hun-
dred thousand men, might well have taken the positions
necessary for the defence of Moselle, or in the alterna-
tive might have gained several marches in the retreat
towards Verdun and Chalons. Only a small part of this
body had as yet been exposed to defeat. It included in
it the very flower of the French forces, tons of thousands
of troops probably equal to any in Europe, and capable
of forming a most formidable army if united to the
reserves which would shortly_be collected at Chftlons
im BORNT, 489
or nearer Paris. Bat from the 7th to the 13th of
August Napoleon, too cowed to take the necessary steps
for battle in defence of the line of Moselle, lingered pur-
poseless and irresolute at Metz, unwilling to fall hack
from this fortress. It was not till the 14th that the
retreat was began. By this time the Germans were
close at hand, and their leaders were little disposed to
let the hesitating enemy escapo them. While the lead-
ing divisions of the French were crossing
the Moselle, Steinmetz hurried forward his
troops and fell upon the French detachments still lying
on the south-east of Metz about Bomy and Courcelles.
Bazaine suspended his movement of retreat in order to
beat back an assailant who for once seemed to be
inferior in strength. At the close of the day the French
commander believed that he had gained a victory and
driven the Germans off their line of advance ; in reality
he had allowed himself to be diverted from the passage
of the Moselle at the last hour, while the Germans left
under Prince Frederick Charles gained the river farther
south, and actually began to cross it in order to bar his
retreat.
From Metz westwards there is as far as the village of
Gravelotte, which is seven miles distant, but one direct
road ; at Gravelotte the road forks, the southern arm
leading towards Yerdun by Vionville and n,„j^^n,„
Mars-la- Tour, the northern by Conflans. *>«■>'■
During the 15th of August the first of Bazaine 's
divisions moved as far as Vionville along the southern
road; others came into the neighbourhood of Grftve*
4M MODESJSr SUSOPS. M»
lotte, but two corps which should have advanced past
Gravelotte on to the northern road still lay close to Metz.
The Prossian vuignard was meanwhile crostiiDg the
Moselle southwards from Noveant to Pont-n-Mousson,
and hurrying forwards by lines converging on the road
taken by Bazaine. Down to the evening of the 15th
it was not supposed at the Prussian headquarters that
Bazaine could be overtaken and brought to battle
nearer than the tine of the Mease ; but on the morning
of the 16th the cavalry-detachments which bad poshed
farthest to the north-west discovered that the heads of
the French columns had still not passed Mars-la-Tour.
An effort was instaotly made to seize the road and
block the way before the enemy. The struggle, begrm
by a handful of combatants on each side, drew to it
regiment after regiment as the French battalions dose
at hand came into action, and the Prussians hiurted up
in wild haste to support their comrades who were
exposed to the attack of an entire army. The rapidity
with which the Prussian generals grasped the situation
before them, the vigour with which they brought up
their cavalry over a distance which no infantry could
traverse in the necessary time, and without a moment's
hesitation hurled this cavalry in charge after charge
against a superior foe, mark the battle of Mars-la-Tour
as that in which the military superiority of the Germans
was most truly shown. Numbers in this battle had
little to do vrith the result, for by better generalBhip
Bazaine could certainly at any one point have over-
powered his enemy. But wWle the Germans roshed
un MARS-LA-TOUR-OBAVSLOTTS. Ml
like a torrent upon the troe point of attaok — ^that is
tho westemmoBt — Bazaine by some delusion considered
it his primary object to prevent the Oermans from
(hmstiiig themselves between the retreating army and
Metz, and so kept a great part of his troops inactive
about the fortress. The result was that the Q-ermans,
with a loss of sixteen thousand men, remained at the
dose of the day masters of the road at Yionville, and
that the French army could not, without winning a
victory and breaking through the enemy's line, resume
its retreat along this line.
It iras expected daring the 17th that Bazaine would
make some attempt to escape by the northern road, but
instead of doing so he fell back on Gravelotte and the
heighta between this and 'Metz, in order to fight a
pitched battle. The position was a weU'Chosen one ;
but by midday on the 18th the armies of Steinmetz and
Prince Frederick Charles were ranged in 0^,^000*.
front of Bazmne with a strength of two *"•■"■
hundred and fifty thousand men, and in the judgment
of the King these forces were equal to the attack.
Again, as at WSrth, the precipitancy of divisional
commaudetB caused the sacrifice of whole brigades
before the battle was won. While the Saxon corps.
with which Moltke intended to deliver his slow but
fiital blow upon the enemy's right flank was eng^^d in
Hs long'northward detour, Steinmetz pushed his Bhine-
landers past the ravine of Qravelotte into a fire where
no human being could survive, and the Qnards, pressing
forward in column over the smooth unsheltered slope
tUS MODERN BUROPS. m
from St. Marie to St. Frirat, sank by thonsaDds withoat
reaching midway in their course. Until the final blow
was dealt by the Saxon corps from the north flank, the
ground which was won by the Prussians was won
principally by their destructiTe artillery fire: their
infantry attacks had on the whole been repelled, and at
Gi-avelotte itself it had seemed for a moment as if the
French were about to break the assailant's line. But
Bazaine, as on the I6th, steadily kept his reserves at a
distance from the points where their presence was most
required, and, according to his own account, succeeded
in bringing into action no more than a hondred
thousand men, or less than two-thirds of the forces
under bis command.* At the close of the awful day,
when the capture of St. Frivat by the Saxons turned
the defender's line, the French abandoned aU their
positions and drew back within the defences of Metz.
The Germans at once proceeded to block all the
roads round the fortress, and Bazaine made no effort to
prevent them. At the end of a few days the line was
drawn around him in sufficient strength
^■E?.?**" to resist any sudden attack. Steinmetx,
who was responsible for a great part of the
loss sustained at Gravelotte, was now removed from his
command ; his army was united with that under Prince
Frederick Charles as the besieging force, while sixty thou-
sand men, detached from this great mass, were formed into
a separate army under Prince Albert of Saxony, and sent
by way of Verdun to co-operate with the Crown Fiioee
* Bftzoiue, L'Armte da Rhin, p. 74 ,^ i
I ,l,z<,.f,LnP0gIf
un UailAHON MOVBB NOBTBWARDS. 443
against McMahon. The Government at Paris tnew
bat imperfectly what was passing around Metzfrom day
to day ; it tnew, however, that if Metz should be given
up for lost the hour of its own fall could not be averted.
One forlorn hope remained, to throw the army which
McMahon was gathering at Ch&lons north-eastward to
Bazaine's relief, though the Crown Prince stood between
Gh&Ions and Metz, and could reach every point in the
line of march more rapidly than McMahon himself.
Napoleon had quitted Metz on the evening of the 1 5th ;
on the 17th a council of war was held at Chalons, at
which it was determined to fall back upon Paris and to
await the attack of the Crown Prince under the forts of
the capital. No sooner was this decision announced
to the Government at Paris than the Empress tele-
graphed to her husband warning him to consider what
would be the effects of his return, and insisting that an
attempt should be made to relieve Bazaine.* McMahon,
against his own better judgment, consented to the
northern march. He moved in the first instance to
Bheims in order to conceal his intention from the
enemy, but by doing this he lost some days. On the
33rd, in pursuance of arrangements made with Bazaine,
whose messengers were still able to escape the Prussian
watch, he set out north-eastwards in the direction of
Montm^dy. The movement was discovered
' Oermui .
by the Prussian cavalry and reported at Sinh^^
the headquarters at Bar-le-Duc on the 25th.
Instantly the westward march of the Crown Prince was
* PapieTB 8£creta du Second Empire Cl87I>)i Jfg- 33, HfK
L i,_. I C.ooglf
Mt KODSiar ansopa. an
arrested, and his army, with that of the Prince of
Sazonj, was thrown northwards in forced marches
towards Sedan. On reaching Le Chesne, west of the
Mouse, on the 37th, HcMahon hecame aware of the
enemy's presence. He saw that his plan was discovered,
and resolved to retreat westwards before it waa too
late. The Bmperor, who had attached himself to the
army, consented, hut t^ain the Government at Paris
interfered with fatal effect. More anxious for the
safety of the dynasty than for the existence of the army,
the Empress and her advisers insisted that McMabon
should continue his advance. ITapoleon seems now io
have abdicated all authority and thrown to the winds all
responsibility. He allowed the march io be resumed in
the direction of Mouzon and Stenay. Failly's corps,
which formed the right wing, was attacked on the 39th
befoi^ it could reach the passage of the Mease at the
latter place, and was driven northwards to Beaumont.
Here the commander strangely imagined himself to be
in security. He was surprised in his camp on the fol-
lowing day, defeated, and driven northwards towards
Mouzon. Meanwhile the left of McMahon's army had
crossed the Meuse and moved eastwards to Carignan,
so that his troops were severed by the river and at some
distance from one another. Part of FaUIy's men were
made prisoners in the struggle on the 80th or dispersed
on the west of the Mease ; the remainder, with their
commander, made a hurried and disorderly escape heyond
the river, and neglected to break down the bridges by
which they had passed, McMahon saw that if the
advance was contiDued his divisiona would one alter
another fall into the enemy's hands. He recalled the
troops which had reached Carignan, and concentrated
his army about Sedan to fight a pitched battle. The
passages of the Meuse above and below Sedan were
seized bj the Germans. Two hundred and forty thou-
sand men were at Moltke's disposal ; McMahon had
about half that number. The task of the Germans waa
not so much to defeat the enemy as to prevent them
from escaping to the Belgian frontier. On g,^^ h^.„
the morning of September let, while on ^^*'"
the east of Sedan the Bavarians after a desperate
resistance stormed the village of Dazeilles, Hessian and
Fnissian regiments crossed the Meuse at Donch^ry several
miles to the west. From either end of thi^ line corps
after corps now pushed northwards round the French
positions, driving in the enemy wherever they found them,
and converging, under the eyes of the Prussian King,
his general, and his Minister, each into its place in the
arc of fire before which the French Empire was to perish.
The movement was as admirably executed as designed.
The French fought furiously but in vain : the mere mass
of the enemy, the mere narrowing of the once completed
circle, crushed down resistance without the clumsy havoc
of Gravelotte. From point after point the defenders
were forced back within Sedan itself. The streets were
choked with hordes of beaten infantry and cavalry ; the
Germans had but to take one more step forward and
the whole of their batteries would command the town.
Towards evening there was a pause in the firing, in
44e UODEBS EUBOPS. W*
order that the French might offer negotiations for
surrender ; but no sign of snrrender was made, and the
Bavarian cannon resumed their fire, throwing shells
into the town itself Kapoleon now caused a white
fiag to be displayed on the fortress, and sent a letter to
the King of Prussia, stating that as he had not been
able to die in the midst of his troops, nothing remained
for him but to surrender his sword into the hands of his
Majesty. The surrender was accepted by King William,
who added that General Moltke would act on his behalf
in arranging terms of capitulation. General Wimpffen,
who had succeeded to the command of the French army
on the disablement of McMabon by a wound, acted on
c^itiotMoRiit ^l»^f of Napoleon. The negotiations con-
*^^^^^^'' tinned till kte in the night, the French
general pressing for permission for his troops to be dis-
armed in Belgium, while Moltke insisted on the sor-
render of the entire army as prisoners of war. Fearing
the effect of an appeal by Napoleon himself to the
King's kindly nature, Bismarck had taken steps to
remove his sovereign to a distance until the terms of
surrender should be signed. At daybreak on September
2nd Napoleon sought the Prussian headquarters. He
was met on the road by Bismarck, who remained in
conversation with him till the capitulation was com-
pleted on the terms required by the Glermans. He
then conducted Napoleon to the neighbouring ch&tean
of BeUevue, where King "William, the Crown Prince,
and the Prince of Saxony visited him. One pang
bad stiU to be borne by the nnhapj^ man. Powo
to liis interview with the King, Napoleon had
imagined that all the German armies together had
operated against him at Sedan, and he must con-
seqaently have still had some hope that his own ruin
might have purchased the delirerance of Bazaine.
He learnt accidentally from the King that Prince
Frederick Charles had never stirred from before Metz.
A convulsion of anguish passed over his face : his eyes
filled with tears. There was no motive for a prolonged
interview between the conqueror and the conquered, for,
as a prisoner, Napoleon could not discuss conditions of
peace. After some minutes of conversation the King
departed for the Prussian headquarters. Napoleon
remained in the chateau nntil the morning of the next
day, and then began his journey towards the place
chosen for his captivity, the palace of Wilhelmshdhe at -
Cassel.*
Bnmours of disaster had reached Paris in the last
days of August, but to each successive report of evil
the Government replied with lying boasts of success,
until on the 3rd of September it was forced
the worst anticipations of the previous days.
With the Emperor and his entire army in the enemy's
hands, no one supposed that the dynasty could any
longer remain on the throne : the only question was by
what form of government the Empire should he suc-
ceeded. The Legislative Chamber assembled in the
dead of night; Jules Favre proposed the deposition
• Piaiy of the Emperor Frederiok, Sept, 2. OO'jIc
448 UODBBS SUSOPM. wf.
of the Emperor, and was heard in silence. The
Assemhiy adjourned for some hoora. On the morning
of the 4th, Thiers, who sought to keep the way open
for aD Orleanist restoration, moved that a Committee
of Government should be appointed by the Chamber
itself, and that elections to a new Assembly shonld be
held as soon as circumstances should permit. Before
this and other propositions of the same nature could be
put to the vote, the Chamber was invaded by the mob.
Qambetta, with most of the Deputies for Paris, pro-
ceeded to the Hfitel de YiUe, and there proclaimed the
BepubHc. The Empress fled ; a Government of
National Defence came into existence, with GI«neraL
Trochu at its head, Jules Favrc assuming the Ministry
of Foreign Affairs and Gambctta that of the Interior.
No hand was raised in defonce of the Napoleonic
dynasty or of the institutions of the Empire. The
Legislative Chamber and the Senate disappeared without
even muking an attempt to prolong their own existence.
Thiers, without approving of the Bepuhlic or the mode in
which it had come into being, recommended his friends
to accept the new Government, and gave it hia own
support. On the 6th of September a circular of Jules
Pavre, addressed to the representatives of Prance at
all the European Courts, justified the overthrow of the
onoiuofjDiM Napoleonic Empire, and claimed for the
ftTw. s^ «. Q-ovemment by which it was succeeded
the goodwill of the neutral Powers. Napoleon IIL
was chaiged with the responsibility for the war : with
the fall of his dynasty, it was urged, the Masf)^^^| for a
MK THE osnuAsa oeaoh pjmb. ub
eontinaaiice of the struggle had ceased to exist. France
only asked for a lasting peace. Such peace, however,
must leave the territory of Fnuice inviolate, for peace
with dishonour would be bat the prelude to a new
war of extermination. " Hot an inch of our soil will
we cede" — so ran the formula — "not a stone of our
fortresses."*
The German Chancellor had nothing ready in the
way of rhetoric equal to his aob^ouist's phrases ; bat
as soon as the battle of Sedan was won it was settled
at the Prussian headquarters that peace would not be
made without the annexation of Alsace and ^^ ^^ ^^
Lorraine. Prince Bismarck has stated "''^' ^"^"^
that his own policy would have stopped at the ac-
quisition of Strasborg : Moltke, however, and the chiefs
of the army pronounced that Glermany could not be
secure against invasion while Metz remained in the
bands of France, and this opinion was accepted by the
King. For a moment it was imagined that the victory
of Sedan had given the conqueror peace on his own
terms. This hope, however, speedily disappeared, and
the march upon Paris was resumed by the army of the
Crown Prince without waste of time. In the tliird
week of September the invaders approached the capital.
Favre, in spite of his declaration of the 6th, was not
* FkTTe's wrenlar alleged that the King of Frasaia hitd declared that
he nude mr not on Franco but on tbe Imperial Dynsatj. King WUIiam
had nerer stated anything of the kind. Sis proclamation on euterinjr
Fr&nee, to which Favre appears to have referred, merelj iiaid that Qm
war was to he waged against the French army, and not n^ust (he ii^
habitants, who, w long as th^ hept quiet, wonU not be molested. ) ( ^ > I C
J> It
4S0 MODXBA EUR(ffa. uK
indisposed to enter upon negotiations ; and, trasting to
his own arts of persuasion, he soogbt an interview
with the German Chancellor, which was granted to
him at Ferri^res on the 19th, and continued on the fol-
lowing day. Bismarck liesitated to treat the Itolders
of office in Paris as an established Government; he was
willing to grant an armistice in order that elections
might be held for a National Assembly with which
Gi«rmMiy could treat for peace ; bat he required, as a
condition of the armistice, that Strasburg and Toul
should be surrendered. Toul was already at the last
extremity; Strasburg was not capable of holding out
ten days longer ; but of this the Qovemment at Paris
was not aware. The conditions demanded by Bismarck
were rejected as insolting to France, and the war was
left to take its course. Already, while Favre was nego-
tiating at Ferriferes, the German vanguard was pressing
round to the west of Paris. A body of French troops
which attacked them on the 19th at Chfttillon was put
to the rout and fled in panic. Versailles was occupied
on the same day, and the line of investment was shortly
afterwards completed around the capital.
The second act in the war now began. Paris had
been fortified by Thiers about 1840, at the time
when it seemed likely that France might be engaged
MMoofpm*. '° ^^^ with a coalition on the affairs of
^*''*' Mehemet Ali. The forts were not distant
enough from the city to protect it altogether from
artillery with the lengthened range of 1870 ; they were
sufficient, however, to render an assault out of the
UN, BlSaa OF PABI8. 4G1
question, and to compel the besieger to rely mainly on
the slow operation of famine. It had been reckoned
hy the engineers of 1840 that food enough might be
collected to enable the city to stand a two-months'
siege ; so vast, however, were the supplies collected in
1870 that, with double the population, Paris had pro-
visions for above four months. In spite therefore of
the capture and destmction of its armies the cause of
France was not hopeless, if, while Paris and Metz
occupied four hundred thousand of the invaders, the
population of the provinces should take up the struggle
with enthusiasm, and furnish after some months of
military exercise troops more numerous than those
which France had lost, to attack the besiegers from all
points at once and to fall npon their communications.
To organise such a national resistance was, howev^,
imposisible for any Oovemnient within the besieged
capital itself. It was therefore determined to establish
a second seat of Government on the Loire;
and before the lines were drawn round
Paris three members of the Ministry, with M. Cr^mietix
at their head, set out for Tours. Cr^mieui, however,
who was an aged lawyer, proved quite unequal to his
task. His authority was disputed in the west and the
south. Revolutionary movements threatened to break
up the unity of the national defence. A stronger
hand, a more commanding will, was needed. Such a
hand, such a wUl belonged to Gkimbetta, who on the
7th of October left Paris in order to nndertake the
government of the provinces uid the organisation c^
(S2 MODSRN BJTBOPS. um.
the national armies. The circle of the besiegers was
DOW too closely drawn for the ordinary laeans of traTel
to be possible. Gambetia passed over the German lines
owMtaat "^ * balloon, and reached Tours in* safety,
'""^ whece he immediately threw his feeble
colleagues into the background and concentrated all
power in his own vigorous grasp. The effect of his pre-
sence was at once felt throughout France. There was
an end of the disorders in the great cities, and of all
attempts at rivalry with the central power. Gambetta
had the faults of rashness, of excessiTe self-confidence,
of defective regard for scientific authority in matters
where he himself was ignorant: but he possessed in
an extraordinary degree the qualities necessary for a
Dictator at such a national crisis : boundless, in-
domitable coorage ; a simple, elemental passion of love
tor his country that left absolutely no place for hesita-
tions or reserve io the prosecution of the one object for
which France then existed, the war. He carried the
nation with him like a whirlwind. Whatever share
the military errors of Gambetta and his rash personal
interference with commanders may have had in the
ultimate defeat of France, without him it would never
have been known of what efibrts France was capable.
The proof of his capacity was seen in the hatred and the
fear with which down to the time of his death he inspired
the German people. Had there been at the head of
the army of Metz a man of one-tenth of Gambetta's
efiective force, it is possible that France might have
closed the war, if not with success, at least with on*
diminished territory.
HK QAMSETFA. 46S
Before Gamb^tta left Paris the &11 of Strasbui^
set free the army under General Werder by which
it had been besieged, and enabled the Germans to
establish a civil Government in Alsace, y^^gt,^
the western frontier of the new province •"»■*!*■«.
having been already bo accurately studied that, when
peace was made in 1871, the frontier-line was drawn
not npon one of the earlier French maps but on the map
now published by the German staff. It was Gambetta's
first task to divide France into districts, each with its
own military centre, its own army, and its own com-
mander. Four such districts were made: the centres
were Lille, Le Mans, Bourges, and Besan^on. At Bourges
and in the neighbourhood considerable progress had
already been made in oi^anisation. Early in October
German cavalry - detachmeuts, exploring rutmj i>ta«,
southwards, found that French troops ^"^
were gathering on the Loire. The Bavarian General
Tann was detached by Moltke from the besieging
army at Paris, and ordered to make himself master
of Orleans. Tann hastened southwards, defeated the
French outside Orleans on the 11th of October, and
occupied this city, the French retiring i^„b,k„
towards Bourges. Gambetta removed the ^^""^ ***•»•
defeated commander, and set in his place General
Aurelle de P^iadines. Tann was directed to cross the
Loire and destroy the arsenals at Bourges ; he reported,
however, that this task was beyond his power, in con-
sequence of which Moltke ordered General Werder
with the army of Strasburg to move westwards against
454 MODSBN SUBOPS. MH
Bourgea, after dispersing the weak forces that were
gathering about Besan^n. Werder set oat on his
dangerons march, bat he had not proceeded far when
an army of veij different power was thrown into the
scale against the French levies on the Loire.
Id the battle of Qravelotte, fought on the 18th of
August, the French troops had been so handled by
Bazaine as to render it doubtful whether he really
intended to break through the enemy's
line and escape from Metz. At what
period political designs inconsistent with his military
duty first took possession of Bazaine's thoughts is
uncertain. He had played a political part in Mexico ;
it is probable that as soon as he found himself at the
head of the one efiective army of France, and saw
Napoleon hopelessly discredited, he began to aim at per-
sonal power. Before the downfall of the Empire he had
evidently adopted a scheme of inaction with the object
of preserving his army entire : even the sortie by which
it had been arranged that he should assist McMahon
on the day before Sedan was feebly and irresolutely
conducted. After the proclamation of the Bepublic
Bazaine's inaction became still more marked. The
intrigues of an adventurer named Begnier, who en-
deavoured to open a negotiation between the Prussians
and the exiled Empress Eugdnie, encouraged him in
his determination to keep his soldiers from fulfilling
their duty to France. Week after week passed by ; a
fifth of the besieging army was struck down with
sickness ; vet Bazaine made no effort to break through,
uM. Buaaxmas or usre, 4ss
or even to dimmish the number of men who were con-
Buming the suppUea of Metz by giving to separate
detachments the opportunity of escape. On the
12th of October, after the pretence of a sortie on the
north, he entered into communication with the German
headquarters at Yersailles. Bismarck offered to grant
a free departure to the army of Metz on condition
that the fortress should be placed in his hands, that
the army should undertake to act on behalf of the
Empress, and that the Empress should pledge her-
self to accept the Prussian conditions of peace, what-
ever these might be. Qeneral Boyer was sent to
England to acquaint the Empress with these pro-
positions. They were declined by her, and after a
fortnight had been spent in manoeuvres for a Bona-
partist restoration Bazaine found himself at the end
of his resources. On the 27th the capitula- c.p;hii^«of
tion of Metz was signed. The fortress *^*"' '**■*'•
itself, with incalculable cannon and material of war,
and an army of a hundred and seventy thousand men,
including twenly-six thousand sick and wounded in the
hospitals, passed into the hands of the Germans.*
Bazaine was at a later time tried by a court-
martial, found guilty of the neglect of duty, and
sentenced to death. That sentence was not executed;
but if there is an infamy that is worse than
death, such infamy will to all time cling
to his name. In the circumstances in which France
* Dentseh-FmiEoraohe Hrieg, Tol. iii., p. IM. Bsulne, p. 16& Proces
deBaukiue, TaLii.,|h21&. Eegnier, p. 20. Salm, iL 171.
4M MOVSBN mmOFM. IM
was placed no effort, no sacrifice of life conld have
been too great for the commaader of the army at
Hetz. To retain the besiegers in fnll strength before
the fortress would not have required the half of
Bazaine's actual force. If half his army had fallen
on the field of batUe in successive attempts to cat
their way through the enemy, brave men would no
doubt have perished ; but even had their efforts f^ed
their deaths would have purchased for Metz the power
to hold out for weeks or for months longer. The
civil population of Metz was but sixty thousand, its
army was three times as numerous; nnlike Paria, it
saw its stores consumed not by helpless millions of
women and children, but by soldiers whose duty it
was to aid the defence of their country at whatever
cost. Their duty, if they could not cut their way
through, was to die fighting ; and had they shown
hesitation, which was not the case, Bazune should
have died at their head. That Bazaine would have
fulfilled his duty even if Napoleon III. had remained
on the throne is more than doubtful, for his inaction
had begun before the catastrophe of Sedan. His
pretext after that time was that the government of
Prance had fallen into the bauds of men of disorder^
and that it was more important for bis army to save
France from the Government than from the invader.
He was the only man ia France who thought so. The
Qovemraeut of September 4th, whatever its faults, was
good enough for tens of thousands of brave men.
Legitimists, Orleanists. Bonapartists, wha flocked
UTOL RKOAPTUBB OF ORLEANS. 457
without distinction of party to its banners : it might
have been good enough for Marshal Bazaine. But
France had to pay the penalty for the political, the
moral indifference which could acqaiesce in the Coop
d'£tat of 1851, in the servility of the Empire, in
many a rile and boasted deed in Mexico, in China, in
Algiers. Such indifference found its Nemeais in a
The surrender of Metz and the release of the great
army of Prince Frederick Charles by which it was
besieged fatally changed the conditions of the French
war of national defence. Two hundred thousand of
the victorious troops of Germany uuder some of their
ablest generals were set iree to attack the still untrained
levies on the Loire and in the north oE France, which,
with more time for organisation, might well have
forced the Germans to raise the siege of Paris. The
army once commanded by Steinmetz was now recon-
stituted, and despatched under General Manteuffel
towards Amiens; Prince Frederick Charles moved
with the remainder of his troops towards the Loire.
Aware that his approach could not long be delayed,
Gambetta insisted that Aorelle de Paladines slionld
begin the march on Paris. The general attacked Tana
at Coulmiers on the 9th of November,
defeated him, and re-occupied Orleans, the ^omCM^
first real success that the French had
gained in the war. There was great alarm at the
German headquarters at Versailles ; the possibility of
A ^ii» of the uege waa discossed; and forty tboa-
U8 IfODSSV SUROPB. m%.
sand troops were sent sonthwards in baste to the
support of the Bavarian general. Anrelle, howeyer,
did not move upon the capital : his troops were still
unfit for the enterprise; and he remained stationary
on the north of Orieans, in order to improve his
organisation, to avrait roiaforcements, and to meet the
attack of Frederick Charles in a strong position. In
the third week of November the leading divisions of
the army of Metz approached, and took post between
Orleans and Paris. Gambetta now insisted that the
effort should be made to relieve the capital. Aurelle
resisted, but was forced to obey. The garrison of
Paris had already made several unsuccessful attacks
upon the lines of their besiegers, the most vigorous
being that of Le Bourget on the 30th of October,
in which bayonets were crossed. It was arranged th;it
in the last days of November Qenerol Trocha should
endeavour to break oat on the southern side, and that
simultaneously the army of the Loire should fall upon
the enemy in front of it and endeavour to force its
way to the capital. On the 28th the attack upon the
Germans on the north of Orleans began. For several
days the struggle was renewed by one
touu, Not. »- divisiou after another of the armies of
Aurelle and Prince Frederick Charles.
Victory remained at last with the Germans; the
centre of the French position was carried; the right
and left wings of the army were severed from one
another and forced to retreat, the one up the Loire.
tlie other towards the west Orleans on the dth
mt. rAILUBB OF THS BELlBTINa ARMIES. 459'
<A December passed back into tbe hands of the Gei>
raasa. The sortie £rom Paris, which began with a
successful attack bj General Ducrot upon
Champigny beyond the Marne, ended after ^t.not.W'
some days of combat in the recorery by
the Germans of the positions which they had lost,
and in the retreat of Ducrot into Paris. In the
same week Manteuffel, moving against
the relieving army of the north, encoan- Amint,
tered it near Amiens, defeated it after
a hard straggle, and gained possession of Amiens
itself.
After tbe fall of Amiens, Manteuffel moved upon
Bouen. This city fell into his hands without resist-
ance ; the conquerors pressed on westwards, uid at
Dieppe troops which had come from the „
confines of Russia gazed for the first time °"-'-
upon the sea. But the EepuUican armies, unlike those
which the Oermans had first encountered, were not to
be crushed at a single blow. Under the energetic com-
mand of Faidherbe the army o£ the North advanced
again upon Amiens. Goeben, who was left to defend
the line of the Somme, went out to meet him, defeated
him on the 33rd of December, and drove him back to
Arras. But again, after a week's interval, Faidherbe
pushed forward. On the 3rd of January he fell upon
Ooeben's weak division at Bapaume, and handled it
BO severely that the Germans would on the
following day have abandoned their position,
if the French had not themselves been the fiist to
180 310VBBH SUROPa. vn.
retire. Faidherbe, however, had only &Uen back to
receive reinforcements. After some clays' rest he onoe
more sought to gain the road to Paris, advandng this
time by the eastward line through St. Quentin. In
front of this town Qoeben attacked him. The last
BL QwrtfB, battle of the army of the North was fought
"* on the 19th of January. The French
general endeavoured to disguise his defeat, but the
Cferman commaoder had won all that he desired.
Faidherbe's army was compelled to retreat northwards
in disorder ; its part in the war was at an elid.
During the last three weeks of December there wa«
a pause in the operations of the Oermans on the Loire.
It was expected that Bourbaki and the east
tttLajnudgf Wing of the Freuch army would soon
te-appear at Orleans and endeavour to
combine with Ohanzy's troops. Qambetta, however,
had formed another plan. He considered that
Ohanzy, with the assistance of divisions formed
in Brittany, would be strong enough to encounter
Prince Frederick Charles, and he determined to throw
the airoy of Bourbaki, strengthened by reinforcements
from the south, upon Germany itself. The design was
a daring one, and had the two French armies been
capable of performing the work which Gfamhetta reqaired
of them, an inroad into Baden, or even the re>conquest
of Alsace, would most seriously have affected the posi-
tion of the Gbrmans before Paris. But Gambetta
miscalculated the power of young, untrained troops,
imperfectly armed, badly fed, against a veteran enemy.
In a series of hard-foaght straggleB the army of the
Loire under Qensral Chanzj was driren back at the
beginning of January from Yenddme to Le Muis. On
the 12ih, Cbanzy took post before this city and fought bia
last battle. Wbile he was making a vigorous resistance
in the centre of the line, the Breton raiments stationed
on his right gave way; the O-ermans pressed round
him, and gained possession of the town. Chanzy
retreated towu^ Jjavai, leaving thousands
of prisoners in the hands of the enemy, and
saving only the debris of an army. Bourhaki in the
meantime, with a numerous but miserably equipped
force, had almost reached Belfort. The report of his
eastward movement was not at first believed Booibau.
at the German headquarters before Paris, and the troops
of General Werder, which had been engaged about Dijon
with a body of auxiliaries commanded by Garibaldi, were
left to bear the brunt of the attack without support.
"When the real state of affairs became known Manteuffel
was sent eastwards in hot haste towards the threatened
point. - Werder had evacuated Dijon and fallen back
upon Vesoiil ; part of his army was still occupied in the
siege of Belfort. As Bourbaki approached he fell back
with the greater part of his troops in order to cover the
besieging force, leaving one of his lieutenants to make
a flank attack upon Bourbaki at Villersexel. This
attack, one of the fiercest in the war, delayed the
French for two days, and gave "Werder time MontMUud,
to occupy the strong positions that he had
ehosen aboat Montb^Uard. Here, on the ^ 16th of
I l,z<..:t,C00gIC
482 KODEBJIf XUBOPB. Hn.
January, began a struggle which lasted for three dajs.
The French, starving and perishing with cold, though 6^
superior in number to their enemy, were led with little
effect agiunst the German entrenchmeots. On the 18th
Bourbaki began his retreat. Werder was tmable to
follow him ; Manteuffel with a weak force was still at
some distance, and for a moment it seemed possible
that Bourbaki, by a rapid movement westwards, might
crush this isolated foe. Gambetta ordered Bourbaki to
make the attempt : the commander refused to court
further disaster with troops who were not fit to face
an enemy, and retreated towards Pontarlier in the
hope of making his way to Lyons. But Manteuffel
now descended in front of him ; divisions of "Warder's
army pressed down from the north ; the retreat was cat
off; and the unfortunate French general, whom a
telegram from Gambetta removed from his command,
attempted to take his own life. On the 1st
TtwEutem '-
B^R^Si^ of February, the wreck of his army, still
numbering eighty-five thousand men, but
reduced to the extremity of weakness and misery,
sought refuge beyond the Swiss frontier.
The war was now over. Two days aft^ Bonrbaki's
repulse at Montb^liard the last unsuccessful sortie was
made from Paris. There now remained provisions only
for another fortnight ; above forty thousand of the in-
habitants bad succumbed to the privations of the siege ;
all hope of assistance from the relieving armies before
actual fiunine should begin disappeared. On the 2drd
of January Favre sought the German Chancellor at
HffL OAFiruLATioxr or pabis. «a
Yersailles in order to discuss the conditions of a general
armistice and of the capitnlation of Paris.
The negotiations lasted for several days; on Pui>uidAj>
the 28tb an armistice was signed with the
declared object that elections might at ouce be freely
held for a National Assembly, which should decide
whether the war should be continued, or on what con-
ditions peace should be made. The conditions of the
armistice were that the forts of Paris and all their
material of war should be handed over to the German
army ; that the artillery of the enceinte should be
dismounted ; and that the regular troops in Paris should.
as prisoners of war, surrender their arms. The National
Guard were permitted to retain their weapons and their
artillery. Immediately upon the fulfilment of the first
two conditions all facilities were to be given for the
entry of supplies of food into Paris.*
The articles of the armistice were duly executed, and
on the 30th of January the Prussian flag waved
over the forts of the French capital. Orders were sent
into the provinces by the Government that elections
should at once be held. It had at one time been feared
by Count Bismarck that Gambetta would acknowledge
no armistice that might be made by his colleagues at
Paris. But this apprehension was not realised, for,
while protesting against a measure adopted
without consultation with himself and his wj^Bari-ai.
companions at Bordeaux, Gambetta did not
• HftliB.ii.21& Talfoe]r,I>ip]<niuiUednGosnn)ementde)aIMf6iut
Kktionale, ii. U. Hertdet, Hap of Europe^ iii 191S, ISU.
464 MODSBN EUROPS. an
actually reject tlie armistice. He called npon the
nation, however, to use the interval for the collection of
new forces; and in the hope of gaining from the
election an Assemhly in favour of a continuation of the
war, he puhlisbed a decree incapacitating for election all
persons who had heen connected with the Government
of Kapoleon IH. Against this decree Bismarck at once
protested, and at his instance it was cancelled by the
Government of Paris. Gambetta thereupon resigned.
The elections were held on the 8th of Pebmaiy, and on
the 12th the National Assemhly was opened at Bord-
eaux. The Government of Defence now laid down its
powers. Thiers — who had been the author of those
fortifications which had kept the Germans at hay for
four months after the overthrow of the Imperial armies;
who, in the midst of the delirium of July, 1870, had done
all that man could do to dissuade the Imperial Govern-
ment and its Parliament from war ; who, in spite of
his seventy years, bad, after the fall of Napoleon
hurried to London, to St. Petersburg, to Florence, to
Vienna, in the hope of winning some support for France,
— was the man called by common assent to the helm
of State. He appointed a Ministry, called npon the
Assembly to postpone all discussions as to the future
Government of France, and himself proceeded to
Versailles in order to negotiate conditions of peace.
For several days the old man stru^led with Count
Bismarck on point after point In the Prussian demands.
Bismarck required the cession of Alsace and Eastern
Lorraine, the payment ft ail milUftrcU of femes, 4nd the
nn. aomanosB or pxaos. us
occupation of part of Paris by the Carman armj until
the coQditions of peace sbould be ratified bj the
Ajssembly. Thiers strove hard to save Metz, bat on
this point the German staff was inexorable ; he snc-
oeeded at last in reducing the indemnity to five milliards,
and was given the option between retaining Belfcnrt and
sparing Paris the entry of the German troops. On the
last point his patriotism decided without a moment's
hesitation. He bade the Germans entor Paris, and saved
Belfortfor France. On the 26th of February preliminaries
of peace were signed. Thirty thousand prguminari^of
German soldiers marched into the Champs
Elys^s on the Ist of March ; but on that same day the
treaty was ratified by the Assembly at Bordeaux, and
after forty-eight hours Paris was freed from the sight of
its conquerors. The Articles of Peace provided for the
gradual evacuation of France by the German army as
the instalments of the indemnity, which were allowed
to extend over a period of three years, should be paid.
There remained for settlement only certain matters of
detail, chiefly connected with finance ; these, however,
proved the object of long and bitter controversy, and
it was not until the 10th of May that the definitive
Treaty of Peace was signed at Frankfort.
France had made war in order to on do the work of
partial onion effected by Prussia in 1866: it achieved
the opposite result, and Germany emerged _^
from the war with the Empire established.
Immediatoly after f i victory of Wdrth the Crown
Prince had seen thft* u^ time had come for abolishing
£ S
MOI>SB}T SUBOPS
the line of division wHcb severed Southern Germany
from the Federation of the North. Hia ,owu concept
tion of the hest form of nation^ anion was a German
Empire with its chief at Berlin. That Count Bismarck
was without plana for uniting North and South QbT'
many it is impossible to believe; but the Minister
and the Crown Prince had ^ways been at enmity ; and
when, after the battle of Sedan, they spoke together of
the future, it seemed to the Prince as if Bismarck had
scarcely thought of the federation of the Empire or of
the re-establishment of the Imperial dignity, and as
if he was inclined to it only under certain reserves. It
was, however, part of Bismarck's system to exclude
the Crown Prince as far as possible from poUtical af^is,
under the strange pretext that his relationship to
Queen Victoria would be abused by the French pro-
clivities of the English Court ; and it is possible that
had the Chancellor after the battle of Sedan chosen to
admit the Prince to his confidence instead of resenting
his interference, the difference between their views as to
the future of Germany would have been seen to he one
rather of forms and means than of intention. But
whatever the share of these two dissimilar spirits in the
initiation of the last steps towards German union, the
work> as ultimately achieved, was both in form and
in substance that which the Crown Prince had con-
ceived. In the course of September negotiations were
opened with each of the Southern States for its enlxy
into the Northern Confederation. Bavaria alone nused
serious difficulties, and demandddftterms to which the
UK romiDATKN OF TBS OBBltAlf EMPIRE. 467
PnissiaD GoTemment could not consent. Eisinarck
re&ained From exercising pressure at Munich, but invited
the several Governments to send representatives to
Versailles for the purpose of arriving at a settlement.
For a moment the Court of Miinich drew the sovereign
of Wurtemberg to its side, and orders were sent to the
envoys of Wiirtembeig at Versailles to act with the
Bavarians in refusing to sign the treaty projected by
Bismarck. The Wurtemberg Ministers hereupon ten-
dered their resignation ; Baden and Hesse-Darmstadt
signed the treaty, and the two dissentient kings saw
themselves on the point of being excluded from
United Germany. They withdrew their opposition,
and at the end of November the treaties uniting aE
the Southern States with the existing Confederation
were executed, Bavaria retaining larger separate rights
than were accorded to any other member of the Union.
In the acts which thus gave to Germany political
cohesion there was nothing that ^tered the title
of its chief. Bismarck, however, had in the mean-
time informed the recalcitrant sovereigns that if
they did not themselves offer the Imperial dignity
to King "William, the North German Parliament
woald do so. At the end of November a letter
was accordingly sent by the King of Bavaria to
all his fellow-sovereigns, proposing that the King of
Fmssia, as President of the newly-formed Federation,
should assume the title of German Emperor. Shortly
afterwards the same request was made by the sune
sovereign to King Willitun himself, in a letter^ dictated
MB ja>DXBN SUBOPB. mn.
by Bismarck. A deputation from the North German
Beichstag, beaded bj its Presideot, Dr. Simson, who,
as President of the Frankfort National Assembly, had
in 1849 offered the Imperial Orown to King Frederick
William, expressed the concurrence of the nation in the
act of the Princes. It was expected that before the end
of the year the new political arrangements would have
been sanctioned by the Parliaments of all the States
concerned, and the 1st of January had been fixed for the
assumption of the Imperial title. So vigorous, however,
was the opposition made in the Bavarian Chamber, that
the ceremony was postponed till the 1 8th. Even then
the final approving vote had not been taken at Munich ;
but a second adjournment would have been fatal to the
dignity of the occasion ; and on the 18th of January,
in the midst of the Princes of Germany and tbe repre-
sentatives of its army assembled in the HaJl
ttaB&ginkJw. of Hirrors at Versailles, King William as-
sumed the title of German Emperor. The
first Parliament of the Empire was opened at Berlin two
months later.
The misfortunes of France did not end with the
fall of its capital and the loss of its border-provinces ;
the terrible drama of 1870 closed with civil war. It
is part of the normal order of French history that when
an established Government is overthrown, and another
is set in its place, this second GK)vernment is in its turn
attacked by insurrection in Paris, and an
effort is made to establish the rule of the
demoota<^ of the capital itself, or of those wbQ f<W the
MTL THB OOiaiUNB OF FAOIS. 469
moment pass for its leaders. It was bo in 1793, in 1831,
in 1848, and it was so a^in in 1870. ' Favre, Trochu,
and tlie other members of the Qoremment of Defence
had assumed power on the downfall of Napoleon III.,
becaase they considered themselves the individaals best
able to serve the State. There were hundreds of other
persons in Paris who had exactly the same opinion
of themselves; and when, with the progresB of the
siege, the Government of Defence lost its popularity and
credit, it was natural that ambitious and impatient men
of a lower political rank should consider it time to try
whether Paris conld not make a better defence under
their own auspices. Attempts were made before the end
of October to overthrow the Government. They were
repeated at intervals, but without success. The imita-
tion, however, continued within the ranks of the
National Guard, which, unlike the National Guard in
the time of Louis Philippe, now included the mass of
the working class, and was the most dangerous enemy,
instead of the support, of Government. The capitula-
tion brought things to a crisis. Favre had declared
that it would be impossible to disarm the National
Guard without a battle in the streets ; at his instance
Bismarck allowed the National Guard to retain their
weapons, and the fears of the Government itself thus
prepared the way for successful insurrection. When
the G^ermanB were about to occupy western Paris, the
National Guard drew off its artillery to Montmartre and
there erected entrenchments. During the next fort-
night, while the Germans were withdrawing from the
430 MODBKHr SUBOPM. m*.
western forts in accordance with the conditions of peace,
the Government and the National Guard stood facing
- one another in inaction ; on the 18th of March General
Lecomte was ordered to seize the artillety parked at
Montmartre. His troops, snrrounded and solicited by
the National Guard, abandoned their com-
mander. Lecomte was seized, and, with
General Clement Thomas, was pat to death.
A revolutionary Central Committee took possession of
the H6tel de Ville ; the troops still remaining faithful
to the Government were withdrawn to Versailles, where
Thiers had assembled the Chamber. Not only Paris
itself, but the western forts with the exception of
Mont Yal^ricn, fell iuto the hands of the insurgents. On
the 26th of March elections were held for the Commune.
The majority of peaceful citizens abstained from voting.
A council was elected, which by the side
of certain harmless and well-meaning men
contained a troop of revolutionists by profession ; and
aft(!r the failure of all attempts at conciliation, hostilities
began between Paris and Versailles.
There were in the ranks of those who fought for the
Bnmdsifve- Commuue some who fought in the sincere
*' ^ belief that their cause was that of munici-
pal freedom ; there were others who believed, and with
good reason, that the existence of the Bepublio was
threatened by a reactionary Assembly at Versailles ; but
the movement was on the whole the work of fanatics who
sought to subvert every authority but their own; and
the unfortunate mob who followed them, in so far as thej
lan. THE OOMitUim. 471
foagbt for anything beyond the duly pay which had
been their only means of sastenance since the siege
b^an, fought for they knew not what. As the conflict
was prolonged, it took on both sides a character of
atrocious violence and cruelty. The murder of G^enerals
Lecomte and Thomas at the outset was avenged by the
execution of some of the first prisoners taken by the
troops of Versailles. Then hostages were seized by the
Commune. The slaughter in cold blood of three hundred
Kational G-uards surprised at Clamart by the besiegers
gave to the Parisians the example of massacre. When,
after a siege of six weeks, in which Paris suffered far more
severely than it had suffered from the cannonade of the
Germans, the troops of Versailles at length made their
way into the capital, bumanity, civilisation, seemed to
have vanished in the orgies of devils. The defenders'
as they fell back, murdered their host^es, and left
behind them palaces, museums, the entire public inheri-
tance of the nation in its capital, in flames. The
conquerors during several days shot down all whom
they took fighting, and in many cases put to death
whole bands of prisoners without distinction. The
temper of the umy was such that the Government,
even if it bad desired, eonld probably not have
mitigated the terrors of this vengeance. But there
was little sign anywhere of an inclination to mercy.
Courts-martial and executions continued long after the
heat of combat was over. A year passed, and the
tribunes were still busy with their work. Above
ten thousand persons were sentenced to transpor-
«7S MODSRir SUBOPM. urn.
tation or imprisonment before public justice was
satisBed.
The material losses which France sustained at Oie
hands of the iavader and in civil war were soon
repaired ; bnt from the battle of Worth down to the
overthrow of the Commune France had been efhced as
a Buropean Power, and its eSacement was turned -to
good account by two nations who were not its enemies.
Russia, with the sanction of Europe, threw off tbe
trammels which had been imposed upon it in the Black
Sea by the Treaty of 1856. Italy gained possession of
Bome. Soon after the declaration of war the troops of
France, after an occupation of twenty-one years broken
only by an interval of some months in 1867, were with-
drawn from the Papal territory. Whatever may have
been the understanding with Victor Emmanuel on which
Napoleon recalled his troops from Civita Vecchia, the
battle of Sedan set Italy free ; and on the
KXS^^ 20th of September the National Army.
after overcoming a brief show of resistance,
entered Bome. The unity of Italy was at last com-
pleted ; Florence ceased to be the national capital. A
body of laws passed by the Italian Parliament, and
known as the Guarantees, assured to the Pope the
honours and immunities of a sovereign, tbe possession of
the Vatican and the Lateran palaces, and a princely
income ; in the appointment of Bishops and
gener^y in the government of the Church
a fulness of authority was freely left to him such as
he possessed in no other Furopean land. But Pius
would accept no compromise for the loss of liis temporal
power. He spumed the reconciliatioD with the Italian
people, which had now for the first time since 1849
become possible. He declared Home to be in the
possession of brigands ; and, with a fine affectation of
disdain for Tictor £mmannel and the Italian Qovem-
ment, he invented, and sustained down to the end of his
life, before a world too busy to pay much heed to his
performance, the reproachful part of the Prisoner of the
TaticaD.
D,a,l,zc.bvG00gIe
CHAPTER Vn.
^nce ftfta ISTl'-AIliance of the Three Emparon — Bevolt of UeniegavitM—
The Andrtny Note— Uurdsr of the Coiualfl ftt Salonilia— The Berlin
Hemonndum— Bejecled by England — Abdul Ade dapoead — HasBacrea in
Bnl{(tiria — Servis and MDn(fln^;ro declue War— Opinioo in England —
DUiaeli — Hooting' of Emperars at Reichstadt — Servian Camptugn. — Dedan-
tion of the Czar — Conferenc^e at ConEtanUnoplo — Its FaQora— The Iiondon
Protwol— Boatia declaree War— Adra.nce on the Ballcam — Oaaan at PleTna
—Second Attack on Plema— The Shipka Poaa—Baamania— Third Attuk
to Flema — Todleben- Fall of Plevna — FoBaago of the Balkaaa— Armiatice
— Bngland— The Fleet paaaea the DaidanaOea—l'rattj of Son St«fano—
England and RuBpia — Secret Agreeaent— Oonveation with Turk^ — Cui-
gieaa of Berlin — Treaty of Berlin — Bulgaria.
Thb storm of 1870 was followed by Bome years of
iin„,ee,rft« EuTOpeati calm. France, recovering with
wonderful rapidity from the wounds in-
flicted by the war, paid with ease the instalments of
ita debt to Ckrmany, and saw its soil liberated from
the foreigner before the period fixed by the Treaty
of Frankfort. The efforts of a reactionary Assembly
were kept in check by M. Thiers; the Republic, as
the form of government which divided Frenchmen the
least, was preferred by him to the monarchical re-
storation which might have won France allies at some
of the European Courts. For two years Thiers baffled
or controlled the royalist majority at Versailles
which sought to place the Comte de Chambord or
the chief of the House of Orleans on the throne,
and thus saved his country from the greatest of all
iBn4T. T&AJHOa AITBS TSB WAR., 4?»
perils, the renewal of civil war. In 1873 he fell
l>efore a combination of his opponents, and McMahon
Bocceeded to the Preeidency, only to find that the
royalist cause was made hopeless by the refusal of the
Comte de Cbamhord to adopt the Tricolour flag, and
that France, after several years of trial, definitely preferred
the Kepnblic. Meanwhile, Prince Bismarck had known
how to frusb^te alt plans for raising a coalition against
▼ictorions Germany among the Powers which had been
injured by its successes, or whose interests were threat-
ened by its greatness. He saw that a Bonrbon or a
Napoleon on the throne of France would find far more
sympathy and confidence at Vienna and St. Petersburg
than the shifting chief of a Eepublic, and ordered Count
Amim, the German Ambassador at Paris, who wished
to promote a Napoleonic restoration, to desist from all
attempts to weaken the Bepublican Government. At
St. Petersburg, where after the misfortunes of 1815
France had found its best friends, the German states-
man had as yet little to fear. Bismarck had sup-
ported Eussia in undoing the Treaty of Paris; in
announcing the conclusion of peace with France, the
German Emperor had assured the Czar in the most
solemn language that his services in preventing the
war of 1870 from becoming general should never be for-
gotten; and, whatever might be the feeling of his sub-
jectB, Alexander II. continued to believe that Russia could
find no steadier friend than the Government of Berlin.
With Austria Prince Bismarck had a more difGcult
part to play. He could hope for no real understanding
so long as Bcnst remaiDed at the head of affairs. But
the events of 1870, utterly frnstrating Beust's plans
AuiukMoftbi foi' ^ coalition against Prussia, and definitely
closing for Austria all hope of recovering
its position within Germany, had shakea the Minister's
position. Bismarck was able to offer to the Emperor
Francis Joseph the sincere and cordial friendship of the
powerful German Empire, on the condition that Austria
should frankly accept the work of 1866 and 1870. He
had dissaaded his master after the victory of Kdnig-
gratz from annexing any Austrian teiTitory ; he had
imposed no condition of peace that left behind it a
lasting exasperation ; and he now reaped the reward of
his foresight. Pi-ancis Joseph accepted the friendship
offered him from Berlin, and dismissed Count Beust
from office, calling to his place the Hungarian Minister
Andrassy, who, by conviction aa well as profession,
welcomed the establishment of a German Empire, and
the definite abandonment by Austria of its interference
in German affairs. In the summer of 1872 the three
Emperors, accompanied by their Ministers, met in
Berlin. No formal alliance was made, but a relation
was established of sufficient intimacy to insure Prince
Bismarck against any efforts that might be made by
France to gain an ally. For five yeai-s this so-c^led
League of the three Emperors continued in more or less
effective existence, and condemned France to isolation.
In the apprehension of the French people, Germany,
gorged with the five milliards but still lean and
ravenous, sought only for some new occasion for war,
im. fSS TSRSS SMPBBOBB. 477
This was not the case. The German nation had entered
iinwillingly into the war of 1870 ; that its ruler, when
once his great aim had been achieved, sought peace not
only in word but in deed the history of subsequent
years has proved. The alarms which at intervals were
raised at Paris and elsewhere had little real foundation ;
and when next the peace of Europe was broken, it was
not by a renewal of the Struggle on the Vo^es, but by
a conflict in the Hast, which, terrible as it was in the
sufferings and the destruction of life which it involved,
was yet no senseless duel between two jealous nations,
but one of the most fruitful in results of all modem
wars, rescuing whole provinces from Ottoman dominion,
and leaving behind it in place of a chaos of outworn
barbarism at least the elements for a future of national
independence among the Balkan population.
In the summer of 1875 Herzegovina rose agunst
its Turkish masters, and in Bosnia conflicts broke oat
between Christians and Mohammedans. The
insurrection was vigorously, though pri- 'S"''^ ^^■
vately, supported by Servia and Montenegro,
and for some months baffled all the efforts made by the
Forte for its suppression. Many thousands of the
Christians, flying from a devastated land and a merci-
less enemy, sought refuge beyoud the Austrian frontier,
and became a burden upon the Austrian Government.
The agitation among the Slavic neighbours and kins-
men of the insurgents threatened the peace of Austria
itself, where Slav and Magyar were almost as ready to
fall upon one another as Christian and Turk. Andi'issy
478 UOBBBN BVBOPS. mt
entered into commonicaiions with the GoTemments oi
St. Petersbui^ and Berlin as to the adoption of a com-
mon line of policy by the three Empires towards the
Porte ; and a scheme of reforms, intendecl to effect the
pacification of the insm^ent provinces, was drawn up by
the three Ministers in concert with one another. This
project, which was known as the AndhUsy Note, and
which received the approval of England and France,
demanded from the Porte the establishment of full and
entire religious liberty, the abolition of the Arming of
taxes, the application of the revenue produced by direct
taxation in BoEuia and Herzegovina to the needs of
those provinces themselves, the institution of a Oom-
mission composed equally of Christians and Moham-
medans to control the execution of these reforms and
of those promised by the Porte, and finally the im-
provement of the agrarian condition of the popula-
tion by the sale to them of waste lands belonging
to the State. The Note demanding these reforms
Aaixim ti<*h ^*^ presented in Constantinople on the
fc«.M,W6. gj^j. ^j January. 1876. The Porte, which
had already been lavish of promises to the insurgents,
raised certain objections in detail, but ultimately de-
clared itself willing to grant in substsmce the conces-
sions which were specified by the Powers.*
Armed with this assurance, the representatives of
Austria now endeavoured to persuade the insurgents to
lay down their arms and the refugees to return to their
homes. But the answer was made that promises enough
• PMi P»p. 1876, ToL Ixixiv., pp. 74, 96
WH. MUEDSB OF TSB OONSULa. 179
had already been given by the Sultan, and that the
qnestion was, not what more was to be written od a
piece of paper, bat how the execution of these promises
was to be enforced. Without some guarantee from the
Great Powers of Europe the refugees refused to place
themselves again at the mercy of the Turk and the
leaders in Herzegovina refused to disband their troops.
The conflict broke out afresh with greater enei^ ; the
intervention of the Powers, far from having
produced peace, xoused the fanatical passions 2™;^*<^^*>°-
of the Mohammedans both against the
Christian rayahs aud gainst the foreigner to whom they
had appealed. A wave of religious, of patriotic agita-
tion, of political disquiet, of barbaric fury, passed over
the Turkish Empire. On the 6th of May the Prussian
and the French Consuls at Salonika were attacked and
murdered by the, mob. In Smyrna and Constantinople
there were threatening movements against the European
inhabitants ; in Bulgaria, the Circassian settlers and the
hordes of irregular troops whom the Government had
recently sent into that province waited only for the
first sign of an expected Insurrection to fall upon their
prey and deltige the land with blood.
As soon as it became evident that peace was not to
he produced by Count Andrassy's Note, the Ministers
of the three Empires determined to meet one another
with the view of arranging further diplo-
matic steps to he tiken in common. Berlin, Memommtiim.
which the Czar was about to visit, was
chosen as the meeting-place ; the date of the me^ng
480 MOPB^r sonops. uM
was fixed for tlie second week in May. It was in the
interral between the despatch of Prince Bismarck's
invitation and the arrival of the Czar, with Prince
Gortschakoff and Count Andr&ssy, that intelligence
came of the murder of the Prussian and French Con-
suls at Salonika. This event gave a deeper seriDus-
ness to the deliberations now hdd. The Ministers
declared that if the representatives of two foreign
Powers could be thiis murdered in broad daylight in a
peaceful town under the eyes of the powerless attthori-
ties, the Christians of the insurgent provinces might
well decline to entrust themselves to an exasperated
enemy. An effective guarantee for the execution of the
promises made by the Porte had become absolutely
necessary. The conclusions of the Ministers were
embodied in a Memorandum, which declared that an
armistice of two months must be imposed on the com-
batanis ; that the mixed Commission mentioned in the
Andrdssy Note must be at once called into being, with
a Christian native of Herzegovina at its head ; and that
the reforms promised by the Porte must be carried out
under the superintendence of the representatives of the
European Powers. If before the end of the armistice
the Porte should not have given its assent to these
terms, the Imperial Courts declared that they must
support these diplomatic efforts by measorm of a more
effective character.*
On the same day that this Memorandum was
signed. Prince Bismarck invited the British, the French,
• Pari. Fap. 1S76, toL kxxir., p. 183.
m. TBS SSBTJN XBUORAlWUBt. 481
and Italian Ambassadors to meet the Kossian and the
Austrian Chancellors at his residence. They did so. The
Memorandum was read, and an ui^ent request was
•made that Great Britain, France, and Italy would com-
bine with the Imperial Couris in support of the Berlin
Memorandum as they bad in support of the Andriissy
Note. As Prince Gortschakoff and Andrdssy were
staying in Berlin only for two days longer, g^^ ^^
it was hoped that answers might be received jS^'jiSJilS^
by telegraph within forty-eight hours.
Within that time answers arrived from the French laxd
Italian Governments accepting the Berlin Memorandum ;
the reply from London did not arrive till five days later ; it
announced the refusal of the Government to join in the
course proposed. Fending further negotiations on this
subject, French, German, Austrian, Italian, and Russian
ships of war were sent to Salonika to enforce satisfaction
for the murder of the Consuls. The Cabinet of London,
declining to associate itself with the concert of the
Powers, and stating that Great Britain, while intending
nothing in the nature of a menace, could not permit
territorial changes to be made in the East without its
own consent, despatched the fleet to Besika Bay.
Up to this time little attention had been paid in
England to the revolt of the Christian subjects of the
Porte or its effect on European politics. Now, how-
ever, a series of events began which excited the interest
and even the passion of the English people ibaoiAJia*
in an extraordinary degree. The ferment p™*""' *»-
in Constantinople was deepening. On the 29tb of May
481 MODSns EUBOPM* m^
the SoltftD Abdul Aziz was deposed by If idhat Pasha
and Hussein Avni, the former the chief of the party
of reform, the latter the representative of the older
Turkish military and patriotio spirit which Abdal
Aziz had incensed by his subserviency to Russia. A
few days later the deposed Sultan was mordered. Hus-
sein Avni and another rival of Midhat were assas-
sinated by a desperado as they sat at the council;
Murad V., who had been raised to the throne, proved
imbecile ; and Midhat, the destined regenerator of the
Ottoman Empire as many outside Turkey believed,
grasped aU but the highest power in the State. To-
wards the end of June reports reached western Europe
ji,,,,,^,^^ of the repression of an insurrection in Bul-
Buig«i^ garia with measures of atrocious violence.
Ser\'ia and Montenegro, long active in support of their
kinsmen who were in arms, declared war.
t«ieg™^d«i«« The reports from Bulgaria, at first vague,
took more definite form ; and at length the
correspondents of German as well as English news-
papers, making their way to the district south of the
Balkans, found in villages still strewed with skeletons
and human remains the terrible evidence of what had
passed. The British Ministry, relying upon the state-
ments of Sir H. Elliot, Ambassador at Constantinople,
at first denied the seriousness of the massacres : they
directed, however, that investigations should be made
on the spot by a member of the Embassy; and Mr.
Baring, Secretary of Legation, was sent to Bulgaria
with this dnty. Baring's report confimwd the accounts
im THE BULOAItlAN KiBBAOSaS. 483
whieli hiB cliief had refased to believe, and placed
the number of the victims, lightlj or wrongly, at not
less than twelve thousand.*
The Bulgarian massacres acted on Europe in 1876
aa the massacre of Chios had acted on Europe in 1822.
In England especially they excited the deepest horror^ ■
and completely changed the tone of public optoioD la
opinion towards the Turt. Hitherto the '^'*'*
public mind had scarcely been conscious of the questions
that were at issue in the East. Herzegovina, Bosnia,
Bulgaria, were not familiar names like Greece ; the
English people hardly knew where these countries
were, or that they were not inhabited by Turks. The
Crimean War had left behind it the tradition of friend-
ship with the Sultan ; it needed some lightniDg-flash,
some shock penetrating all ranks of society, to dispel
once and for all the conventional idea of Turkey as a
community resembling a European State, and to bring
home to the English people the true condition of the
Christian races of the Balkan ander their Ottoman
masters. But this the Bulgarian massacres effectively
did ; and from this time the great mass of the English
people, who had sympathised so strongly with the
Italians and the Hungarians in their straggle for
national independence, were not disposed to allow the
influence of Clreat Britain to be used for the perpetua-
tion of Turkish ascendency over the Slavic races.
There is little doubt that if in the autumn of 1876 the
naUoa had had the opportunity of expressing its views
• PmL P«p. 1877, ToL xc, p. 143. ,^ ,
, A 8 , .„,.,C.oo8lc
<U MODSRN EUBOFB. HK
by a Parliamentaiy election, it would have insisted on
the adoption of actiTe measures in concert with the
Powers which were prepared to force reform npon the
Porte. But the Parliament of 1876 was hut two years
old ; the majority which supported the Govenunent
was stitl nnbroken; and at the head of the Cabinet there
was a man gifted with eitraordinary tenacity of purpose,
with great powers of command over others, and with
a clear, cold, untroubled apprehension of the line of
conduct which he intended to pursue. It was one of
the strangest features of this epoch that a Minister who
in a long career bad never yet exercised the slightest
influeDce npon foreign affairs, and who was not him-
self English by birth, should have impressed in such
an extreme degree the stamp of his own individuality
upon the conduct of oar foreign policy ; that he should
have forced England to the very front in the crisis
through which Europe was passing; and that, for
good or for evil, he should have reversed the tendency
which since the Italian war of 1859 had seemed ever
to be drawing England further and further away from
Continental affairs.
Disraeli's conception of Parliamentary politics was
an ironical one. It had pleased the British nation
that the leadership of one of its great political parties
should be won by a man of genius only
on the condition of accommodating himself
to certain singular fancies of his contemporaries ; and
for twenty years, from the time of his attacks upon
Sir Bobert Peel for the abolition of the oom-Iaws down
. . CooJc
UM. DIBItAXLL 485
to the time when he educated his partj into the
democratic Beform BUI of 1867, Disraeli with an ex-
cellent grace suited himself to the somewhat strange
parts which he was required to play. But after 1874,
when he was placed in office at the head of a powerful
majority in both Houses of Parliament and of a sub-
missive Cabinet, the antics ended ; the epoch of states-
manship, and of statesmanship based on the leader's
own individual thought not on the commonplace of
public creeds, began. At a time when Cavour was
rice-growing and Bismarck unknown outside his own
county, Disraeli had given to the world in Tancred his
visions of Eastern Empire. Mysterious chieftains
planned the regeneration of Asia by a new crusade of
Arab and Syrian votaries of the one living faith, and
lightly touched on the tninsfer of Queen Victoria's Court
from London to Delhi, Nothing indi.'ed is perfect;
and Disraeli's eye was favoured with such extra-
ordinary perceptions of the remote that it proved
a little uncertain in its view of matters not quite
withoat importance nearer home. He thouglit the
attempt to establish Italian independence a misde-
meanour ; he listened to Bismarck's ideas on the future
of Germany, and described them as the vapourings of
a German baron. For a quarter of a century Disraeli
had dazzled and amused the House of Commons with-
out, as it seemed, drawing inspiration from any one
great canse or discerning any one of the political goals
towards which the nations of Europe were tending.
At length, however, the time came for the realisation
486 MODB^r BUROrE. ml
of hig own imperial policy ; and before the Hastem
qaestion bad risen conspicuously above the horizon
in Europe, Disraeli, as Prime Minister of England,
bad began to act in Asia and Africa. He Bent the
Prince of Wales to hold Durbars and to hunt tigers
amongst the Hindoos ; he proclaimed the Queen
Empress of India ; he purchased the Khedive's shares
in the Suez Canal. Thus far it had been uncertain
whether there was much io the Minister' policy beyond
what was theatrical and picturesque; but when a
great part of the nation began to ask for intervention
on behalf of the Eastern Christians against the Turks,
they found out that Disraeli's purpose was solid
enough. Animated by a deep distrust and fear of
Kussia, he returned to what had been the policy of
Tory Governments in the days before Canning, the
identification of British interests with the maintenance
of Ottoman power. If a generation of sentimentalists
were willing to sacrifice the grandeor of an Empire to
their sympathies with an oppressed people, it was not
Disraeli who would be their instrument. When the
massacre of Batak was mentioned in the House o£
Commons, he dwelt on the honourable qualities of the
Circassians ; when instances of torture were alleged,
he remarked that an oriental people generally ter-
minated its connection with culprits in a more expedi-
tious manner.* There were indeed Englishmen enough
who loved their country as well as Disraeli, aud who had
proved their love by sacrifices which Disraeli had not had
• PmL Doh. Jal^ 10, 1876, Twbatim.
I i,z<..t,CoogIf
occasion to make, who thought it hnmillatiiig that the
greatneBs of England should be purchased by the servi-
tude and oppression of other races, and that the security
of their Empire should be deemed to rest on so miserable
a thing as Turkish rule. These were considerations to
which Disraeli did not attach much importance. He
believed the one thing needful to be the curbing of
Russia; and, unlike Canning, who held that Hussia
would best he kept in check by England's own armed
co-operation with it in establishing the independence
of Greece, he declined irom the first to entertain any
project of imposing reform on the Sultan by force,
doubting only to what extent it would he possible for
him to support the Sultan in resistance to other
Powers. According to bis own later statement he
would himself, had he beeu left unfettered, have de-
finitely informed the Czar that if he should make war
upon the Porte England would act as its ally. Public
opinion in England, however, rendered this course im-
possible. The knife of Circassian and Bashi-Bazouk
had severed the bond with Great Britain which had
saved Turkey in 1854. Disraeli — henceforward Earl of
Beaconsfield — could only utter grim anathemas against
Servia for presuming to draw the sword upon its
rightful lord and master, and chide those impatient
English who, like the greater man whose name is
associated with Beaconsfield, considered that the world
need not be too critical as to the means of getting rid
of such an evU as Ottoman rule.*
* S«e S>irke'> ^eecli on the Biuaaii annsiueiit, llarcli 29, 1791, ind
4SS KODBRN EUROPE. MM-
The rejection bjr England of the Berlin Memo-
randum and the proclamation of war by Servia and
Montenegro were followed by the closer union of the three
Imperial Courts. The Czar and the Emperor Francis
Joseph, with their Ministers, met at Beicbstadt in
Bohemia on the 8th of July. According to official
statements the result of the meeting was
"SS^jS^^ that the two sovereigns determined upon
non-intervention for the present, and pro-
posed only to renew the attempt to unite all the
Christian Powers in a common policy when some
definite occasion should arise. Bamours, however,
which proved to be correct, went abroad that something
of the nature of an eventual partition of European
Turkey had been the object of negotiation. A Treaty
had in fact been signed providiog that if Bussia
should liberate Bulgaria by arms, Austria should enter
into pos.ses8ion of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The
neutrality of Austria had virtually been purchased at
this price, and Russia had thus secured freedom of
action in the event of the necessary reforms ■ not being
forced upon Turkey by the concert of Europe. Sooner
perhaps than Prince Gortschakoff had expected, the
religious enthusiasm of the Kussian people and their
sympathy for their kinsmen and fellow-believers beyond
the Danube forced the Czar into vigorous action. In
the passage on " (lie barb&rons autrclua deapotism " of Tnrkej- in liis B«-
flections on the Frencli KeTolntion. p. 150, Clar. Edit. Burke lived and died
at Beaconefield, nnd bis grave is there. There eeenis, howerer, to be no
evidence for the Btarj that he waa about to receive a peerage with the
litl» of Bettoana&M, when th? deatb «( Ms wm bf«l[e oU U« bopet.
UM. SEBVIAN WAS. 486
Spite of the assistance of several thousands oE Russian
Tolanteers and of the leadership of &e RuRsian General
Tchemaieff, the Servians were defeated in
their struggle with the Turks. The media- •'^i^
tion of England was in vain tendered to
tlie Forte on the only terms on which even at
London peace was seen to he possible, the mainten-
ance of the existing nghts of Servia and the establish-
ment of provincial autonomy in Bosnia, Herzegovina,
and Bulgaria. After a brief suspension of hostilities
in September wm waa renewed. The Servians were
driven from their positions: Alexinatz vras captured,
the road to Belgrade lay open, and the doom of Bul-
garia seemed likely to descend upon the conquered
Principality. The Turks offered indeed a five months'
umistice, which Wonld have saved them the risks of
a winter campaign and enabled them to crush their
enemy with accumulated forces in the following spring.
This, by the advice of Russia, the Servians refused to
accept. On the 30th of October a Russian
ultimatum was handed in at Constantinople •<■ ntaui^^
by the Ambassador Ignatieff, requiring
within forty-eight hours the grant to Servia of an
armistice for two months and the cessation of hostilities.
The Porte submitted ; and wherever Slav and Ottoman
stood facing one another in arniB, in Herzegovina and
Bosnia as well as Servia and Montenegro, there was a
panse in the struggle.
The imminence of a war between Bossia and Turkey in
the last days of October and th« dose connection between
00 MODERN SUROPB. UK
Bossia and tlie Servian cause jnstiiied the anxiety of
tbe Britiiil) Government. Tbis uixiety tlie Czar sought
to dispel by a frank declaration of his own
views. On tbe 2nd of November he entered
into conversation with the British Ambassa-
dor, Lord A. Loftus, and assured him on his word of
honour that he bad no intention of acquiring Constanti-
nople ; that if it should be necessary for him to occapy
part of Bulgaria his army would remain there only
until peace was restored and tbe security of tbe Christian
population established ; and generally, that he desired
nothing more earnestly than a complete accord between
Kngland and Bussia in the maintenance of European
peace and the improvement of tbe condition of the
Christian population in Turkey. He stated, however,
with perl'ect clearness that if the Porte should continue
to refuse the reforms demanded by Europe, and the
Powers should put up with its continued refusal, Russia
would act alone. Disclaiming in words of great
earnestness all desire for territorial aggrandisement,
he protested against the suspicion with which his policy
was regarded in England, and desired that his words
might be made public in England as a message of peace.*
Lord Derby, then Foreign Secretary, immediately ei-
pressed the satisfaction with which tbe Government
had received these assurances ; and on tbe
^UToSte. followiog day an invitation was sent from
London to all the European Powers pro>
posing a Conference at Constantinople, on the basis of
■ Pari Paji- 1877, tal.xfl.,p. 642; 187^ toL lxxzi„ p. 67Sl
■.oogle
tam A OONFERENOB PB0P08SD. 4&1
a common lecc^ition of tlie integrity of the Otto-
man Empire, accompanied bj a disavowal on the part
of each of the Powers of all aims at ^grandisement or
separate advantage. In proposing this Conference the
GoTemment acted in conformity with the expressed
desire of the Czar. But there were two voices within
the Cabinet. Ix)rd Beaconsfield, had it been in his
power, wovdd have informed Eussia categorically
that England would sufiport the Sultan if attacked.
This the country and the Cabinet forbade: but the
Premier had his own opportunities of utterance, and
at the Guildhall Banquet on the 9th of November, six
days after the Foreign Secretary had acknowledged the
Czar's message of friendship, and before this mess^e
had been made known to the English people. Lord
Beaconsfield uttered words which, if they were not idle
bluster, could have been intended only as a menace to
the Czar or as an appeal to the war-party at home : —
" Though the policy of England is pea^e, there is no
country so well prepared for war as our own. If
England enters into conEict in a righteous cbuse, her
resources are inexhaustible. She is not a country that
when she enters into a campaign has to ask herself
whether she can support a second or a third campaign.
Slie enters into a campaign which she will not ter-
minate till right is done."
The proposal made by the Earl of Derby for a
Conference at Constantinople was accepted by all
the Powers, and accepted on the bases specified.
liOid Salisbuiy, then Secretary of State for India, was
m VODSBlf MUBOFS. nM
appointed to represent Great Britun in conJTitictioii
with Sir H. Elliot, its Ambassador. The Minister
made his journey to Constantinople by way of the
European capitals, and learnt at Berlin that the good
understanding between the German Emperor and the
Czar extended to Eastern affairs. Whether the British
Government had as yet gained any trustworthy in-
formation on the Treaty of Bcichstadt is doubtful;
but so far as the public eye could judge, there was now,
in spite of the tone assumed by Lord Beaconsfield, s
fairer prospect of the solution of the Eastern question
by the establishment of some form of autonomy in the
Christian provinces than there had been at any previous
time. The Porte itself recognised the serious intention
of the Powers, and, in order to forestall the work of
the Conference, prepared a scheme of constitutional
reform that far surpassed the wildest claims
Du omAoa- of Hcrzegovinian or of Serb. Nothing less
tlian a complete system of Pi^liamentary
Government, with the very latest ingenuities from
France and Belgium, was to be granted to the entire
Ottoman Empire. That Midhat Pasba, who was the
author of this scheme, may have had some serious end
in view is not impossible ; but with the mass of Palace-
functionaries at Constantinople it was simply a device
for embarrassing the West with its own inventions;
and the action of men in power, both great and
small, continued after the constitution had come into
nominal existence to be exactly what it had been
before. The veiy teriuB pf the constitution most have
UN. THE PRELUnNJRT OOlrFBBE.S'CB. 4m
been unititelligible to all bat those who had been
employed at foreign courts. The Government might
as well have annonnced its ioteaiion of clothing the
Balkans with the flora of the deep sea.
Tq the second week of December the representatives
of the six Great Powers assembled at Constantinople.
In order that the demands of Europe should be pre-
sented to the Porte with unanimity, they determined
to hold a series of preliminary meetings with one
another before the formal opening of the Conference
and before communicating with the Turks. At these
meetings, after Ignatieff had withdrawn his nemu,4,
proposal for a Russian occupation of Bui- R«i™iiuuT
garia, complete accord was attained. It °*°' """■
was resolved to demand the cessioD of certain small
districts by the Porte to Servia and Montenegro ; the
grant of administrative autonomy to Bosnia, Herze-
govina, and Bulgaria ; the appointment in each of
these provinces of Christian governors, whose terms of
office should be for five years, and whose nomination
should he subject to the approval of the Powers ; the
confinement of Turkish troops to the fortresses; the
removal of the bands of Circassians to Asia ; and finally
the execution of these reforms under the superintendence
of an International Commission, which should have at
its disposal a corps of six thousand gendarmes to be
enlisted in Switzerland or Belgium. By these arrange-
ments, whUe the Sultan retained his sovereignty and
the integrity of the Ottoman Empire remained un-
impaired, it was conceiTed tiiat the ChristiaD population
4H MODERN EUBOPS. mt.
would be effectivelj secured i^ainst Turkish violence
and caprice.
All differences between the representatives of the
European Powers having been removed, the formal
Conference was opened on the 23rd of December under
the presidency of the Turkish Foreign Minister, Savfet
Pasha. The proceedings had not gone far when they
were interrupted by the roar of cannon. Savfet ex-
plained that the new Ottoman constitution was being
promulgated, and that the salvo which the members of
the Conference beard announced the birth of an era
of nniversal happiness and prosperity in the Sultan's
dominions. It soon appeared that in the presence of
this great panacea there was no place for the reforming
efforts of the Christian Powers. Savfet
i^^d^^^ declared from the first that, whatever con-
t|>aui,j*a.KS cessions might be made on other points,
the Sultan's Ci^vemment would never eon-
sent to the establishment of a Foreign Commission
to superintend the execution of its reforms, nor to the
joint action of the Powers in the appointment of the
governors of its provinces. It was in vain u^ed
that without such foreign control Europe possessed no
guarantee that the promises and the good intentions
of the Porte, however gratifying these might he, would
be earned into effect. Savfet replied that by the
Treaty of 1856 the Powers had declared the Ottoman
Empire to stand on exactly the same footing as any
other great State in Europe, and had expressly debarred
themselves from interfering, under whatever ciroom-
1877. FAILURE OF THE OONFERENOB. *BS
staoceB, witli its intenial administration. The position
of the Turkish representative at the Conference was
in fact the only logical one. In the Treaty (rf Paris
the Powers had elaborately pledged themselves to an
absurdity ; and this Treaty the Turk was never weary
of throwing in their faces. But the situation was not
one for lawyers and for the interpretation of docoments.
The Conference, after hearing the arguments and the
counter-projects of the Turkish Ministers, after re-
considering its own demands and modifying these in
many important points in deference to Ottoman wishes,
adhered to the demand for a Foreign Commission and
for a European control over the appointment of
governors. Midhat, who was now Grand Yizier, sum-
moned the Great Council of the Empire, and presented
to it the demands of the Conference. These demands
the Great Council unanimoasly rejected. Lord Salisbury
had already warned the Sultan what would be the
results of continued obstinacy; and after receiving
Midhat's final reply the ambassadors of all the Powers,
together with the envoys who liad been specially ap-
pointed for the Conference, quitted Constantinople.
Russia, since the beginning of November, had been
actively preparing for war. The Czar had left the world in
no doubt as to his own intentions in case of the failure
of the European concert ; it only remained for him to
ascertain whether, after the settlement of a
definite scheme of reform by the Conference g*™*.
and the rejection of this scheme by the
Porte, the Powers would or would not take, steps ilio
4M UODSRN BUSOPE. WB
enforce their conclusion. England suggested tiiat the
Sultan should be allowed a year to cany out his good
intentions : Gortschakoff inquired whether England
would pledge itself to action if, at the end of the
year, refonn was not effected ; but no suet pledge was
forthcoming. With the object either of discovermg
some arrangement in which the Powers would combine,
or of delaying the outbreak of war until the Bossian
preparations were more advanced and the season more
favourable, Ignatieff was sent round to all the European
Courts. He visited England, and subsequently drew
up, with the assistance of Count Schouvaloff, Russian
Ambassador at London, a document which gained the
approval of the British as well as the Continent^
G-ovemments. This document, known as the London
Protocol, was signed on the 31st of March. After a
reference to the promises of reform made by the Porte,
it stated that the Powers intended to watch carefully
by their representatives over the manner in which tiiese
promises were carried into effect; that if their hopes
should be once more dii^appointed they should r^ard
the condition of affairs as incompatible with the
interests of Europe ; and that in such case they would
decide in common upon the means best fitted to
secure the well-being of the Christian population and
the interests of general peace. Declarations relative
to the disarmament of Russia, which it was now the
principal object of the British Q-overmnent to effect,
were added. There was indeed so little of a sub-
stantial engagement in this Protocol that it would have
un. DEOLA&ATION OF WAS. 497
been snrprisiBg liad Russia disarmed withoat obtaining
some Further guarantee for the execution of reform.
But weak as the Protocol was, it was rejected by the
Porte. Once more the appeal was made
io the Treaty of Paris, once more the iei««tiaP^
Sultan protested against the encroachment
of the Powers on his own inviolable rights. Lord
Beaconsfield's Cabinet even now denied that the last
word had been spoken, and professed to entertain some
hope in the eSect of subsequent diplomatic steps ;
but the rest of Europe asked and expected no further
forbearance on the part of Russia. The army of
operations already lay on the Pruth : the Grand Duke
Nicholas, brother of the Czar, was appointed to its
command ; and on the 24th of April the
Russian GoTemment issued its declaration ^^H^^^
of war.
Between the Russian frontier and the Danube lay
the Principality of Roumania. A convention signed
before the outbreak of hostilities gave to the Russian
army a free passage through this territory, and Ron-
mania subsequently entered the war as Russia's ally.
It was not, however, until the fourth week of June
that the invaders were able to cross the Danube. Seven
army-corps were assembled in Roumania; of these one
crossed the Lower Danube into the Dobnidscha, two
were retained in Roumania as a reserve,
and four crossed the river in the neigh- uannba,
bourhood of Sistowa, in order to enter upon
the Bulgarian campaign. It was the dcidre o^t (he
m UODSRN EUBOPS. mt,
Bossiana to throw forward tlie central part of their
annj hy the line of the river Jantra upon the Balkans ;
with their left to move against Rustchuk and the
Turkish wmies in the eastern fortresses of Bulgaria;
with their right to capture Nicopolis, and guard the
central column against any flank attack from the
west. But both in Europe and in Asia the Russians
had underrated the power of their adversary, and
entered upon the war with insufficient forces. Ad-
vanbiges won by their generals on the ArmeDian
frontier while the European army was still marching
through Boumania were lost in the course of the next
few weeks. Bayazid and other places that fell into the
hands of the Bussians at the first onset were recovered
by the Turks under Mukhtar Pasha ; and within a few
days after the opening of the European campaign the
Bu.ssian divisions in Asia were everywhere retreating
upon their own frontier. The Bulgarian campaign was
marked hy the same rapid successes of the invader at
the outset, to be followed, owing to the same insuffi-
ciency of force, by similar disasters. Encountering
no efiective opposition on the Danube, the Bussians
AdTMi«iMiUi« pushed forward rapidly towards the Balkans
iuik..-.jui,. ^^ ^.JJg ^j^g ^^ j,jjg j^jj^j,^^ rpijg Turkish
army lay scattered in the Bulgarian fortresses, from
Widdin in the extreme west to Shumla at the foot
of the Eastern Balkans. It was considered by the
Bnssian commanders that two army-corps would be
required to operate against the Turks in Eastern Bul-
garia, while one corps would be enough io, cover, the
vm. FIB8T PASSAQB OF TES BJLKANB. 499
central line of invasion from the west. There remained,
excluding the two corps in reserve in Boamania and
the corps holding the Dobradscha, but one corps for
the march on the Balkans and Adrianople. The com-
mand of the vanguard of this body was given to
G^eneral Gonrko, who pressed on into the Balkans,
seized the Shipka Pass, and descended into Southern
Bulgaria (July 15). The Turks were
driven &om Xesanlik and Eski Sagra, and th.B«ikuii,
Gonrko's cavalry, a few hundreds in num<
ber, advanced to within two days' march of Adrianople.
" The headquarters of the whole Russian army were
now at Timova, the ancient Bulgarian capital, about half-
way between the Danube and the Balkans. Two army-
corps, commanded by the Czarewitch, moved eastwards
against Bustchuk and the so-called Turkish army of the
Danube, which was gathering behind the lines of the
Kara Lom ; another division, under General Krudener,
turned westward and captured Nicopolis with its gar-
rison. Xiovatz and other points lying westward of
the Jantra were occupied by weak detachments ; but
so badly were the reconnaissances of the Russians per-
formed in this direction that they were omumoecnnie.
unaware of the approach of a Turkish """■^'^r"-
army from Widdin, thirty-five thousand strong, till
this was close on their flank. Before the Russians could
prevent him, Osman Fasha, with the van-
guard of this army, had occupied the town ^t 2SUU,
and heights of Plevna, between N'icopolis
and Lovatz. On the 30th of July, atill onaware of their
500 ttODBRir BWtOFa. ult
enemy's strength, the Bossians attacked him at Plema :
they were defeated with considerable loss, and after a few
days one of Osman's divisions, pushing forward upon
the invader's central line, drove them oat of Lovatz.
The Qrand Duke now sent reinforcements to Srudener,
and ordered him to take Plevna at all costs. Krade-
ner's strength was raised to thirty-five thousand ; but
in the meantime new Turkish regiments had joined
Osman, and his troops, now numbering about fifty
thousand, had been working day and night entrenching
themselves in the heights round Plevna which the
B«™oa uttiB rt Eussians had to attack. The assault was
back with terrible slaughter, the Russians leaving
a fifth of their number on the field. Had Osman
taken np the offensive and the Turkish commander
on the liom pressed vigorously upon the invader's line,
it would probably have gone ill with the Russian army
in Bulgaria. Gourko was at once compelled to
abandon the country south of the Balkans. His troops,
falling back upon the Shipka Pass, were there attacked
from the south by far superior forces under Suleiman
Pasha. The Ottoman commander, prodigal of the
TheK.ipk.ft«, ^^^^ ^^ liJs men and trusting to mere blind-
Auit.jo-m £^j^ violence, hurled his army day after day
against the Eussian positions (Aug. 20 — 23). There
was a moment when all seemed lost, and the Eussian
soldiers sent to their Ozar the last message of devotion
from men who were about to die at their post. But in
the extremity of peril there arrived a reinfoioement, {
u7t. PLsri!r± MS
weak, bnt Baffioient to turn tlie scale against the
iU-commanded Turks. Suleiman's army withdrew to
the vill^e of Shipka at the aouthern end of the pasa.
The pass itself, with the entrance from northern
Bulgaria, remained in the hands of the Itassiana.
After the second battle of Plevna it became clear
that the Eussians could not carry on the campaign
with their existing forces. Two army-corps were
called up which were guarding the coast of
the Black Sea ; several others were mobil-
ised in the interior of Russia, and b^an their joamey
towards the Danube. So urgent, however, was the
immediate need, that the Czar was compelled to ask
help from Boumania. This help was given. Bonmanian
troops, excellent in quality, filled up the gap caused by
Krudener's defeats, and the whole army before Flevna
was placed under the command of the Boumanian
Prince Charles. At the beginning of September the
Russians were again ready for action. liOTatz was
wrested from the Turks, and the division which had
captured it moved on to Plevna to take part in a
great combined attack. This attack was made on the
11th of September under the eyes of the Czar. On
the north the Russians and Roumanians
together, after a desperate struggle, stormed r^=^ bbpl n
the Ghivitza redoubt. On the south Skobe-
leff carried the first Turkish position, but could make
no impression on their second line of defence. Twelve
thousand men fell on the Russian side before the day
was over, and the main defences of the Tnrks were
50a ItODEBN EVEOTS, lOT.
still unbroken. On the morrow the Turks took up
the oSenBive. Skobeleff, exposed to the attack of a
far superior foe, prayed in vaio for reinforcements.
His men, standing in the positions thai they had won
from the Turks, repelled one onslaught after another,
bnt were ultimately overwhelmed and driven from the
field. At the close of the second day's battie the
Russians were everywhere beaten back within their
own lines, except at the Grivitza redoubt, which was
itself but an oatwork of the Turkish defences, and
faced by more formidable works within. The assailants
had sustained a loss approaching that of the Germans
at Glravelotte with an army one-third of the Germans*
strength. Osman was stronger than at the beginning
of the campaign; with what sacrifices Kussia would
have to purchase its ultimate victory no man could
calculate.
The three defeats at Plevna cast a sinister light
upon the ^Russian military administration and the
quality of its chiefs. The soldiers had fought heroic-
ally; divisional generals like Skobeleff had done all
^j^jj,^,,^^ that man could do in such positions; the
"*""™' faults were those of the headquarters and
the officers by whom the Imperial Family were sur-
rounded. After the third catastrophe, public opinion
called for the removal of the authors of these disasters
and the employment of abler men. Todleben, the
defender of Sebastopol, who for some unknown reason
had been left without a command, was now summoned
ti Bulgaria, and virtually placed at the head of the
IsfT. rAUi OF VLEVSA. 503
army before Plevna. He saw that the Btronghold of
Osman could only be reduced by a regular siege,
and prepared to draw his linea right round it. For a
time Osman kept open his communications with the
south-west, and heavy trains of ammunition and
supplies made their way into Plevna from this direc-
tion ; but the investment was at length completed, and
the army of Plevna cut off from the world. In the
meantime new regiments were steadily pouring into
Bulgaria from the interior of Bussia. East of the
Jantra, after many alternations of fortune, the Turks
were finally driven back behind the river Lom.
The last efforts of Suleiman failed to wrest the
Shipka Pass from its defenders. From the narrow
line which the invaders had with such difficulty held
dnring three anxious months their forces, accumu-
lating day by day, spread out south and west up to the
slopes of the Balkans, ready to burst over the moun-
tain-barrier and sweep the enemy back to the walls
of Constantinople when once Plevna should have fallen
and the army which besieged it should be added to the
invader's strength. At length, in the second week of
December, Osman's supply of food was exhausted.
Victor in three battles, he refused to surrender without
one more struggle. Oa the 10th of December, after
distributing among his men what there remained of
provisions, he made a desperate effort to F^ofpievm.
break out towards the west. His columns °°°" '""
dashed in vain against the besieger's lines; behind him
his enemies pressed forward into the positions which
6M itopsiar susopa. wt-*.
he had abandoned; a ring of fire like that of Sedan
Burrounded the Turkish army; and aftOT thousands
had fallen in a hopeless conflict, the general and the
troops who for fire months had held in check the
collected forces of the Bussian Empire Bmrendered to
their conqueror.
If in the first stipes of the war there waa little that
did credit to Bussia's military capacity, the enet^ that
marked its close made amends for what had gone be-
fore. Winter was descending in extreme severity : the
Balkans were a mass of snow and ice ; bat no obstacle
could now bar the invader's march. Gourko, in com-
maud of an army that bad gathered to the south-west
of Plevna, made his way through the mountains above
Etropol in the last days of December, and, driving the
Turks from Sophia, pressed on towards Fhilippopolis
and Adrianople. Farther east two columns crossed the
Balkans by bye-paths right and left of the Shipka
Pass, and then, converging on Shipka it-
Baikuu, Deals self, fell UDou the rear of the Turkish
-Jan. a. ' '^
army which still blocked the southern
outlet. Simaltaneously a third corps marched down
the pass from the north and assailed the Turks in
front. After a fierce struggle the entire Turkish army,
thirty-five thousand strong, laid down its arms. There
f^pitouiionot ^^^ remained only one considerable force
^'**^'"'*' between the invaders and ConstMitinople.
This body, which was commanded by Suleiman, held
the road which runs along the valley of the Maritza, at
a point somewhat to the east of Philippopolis. Against
um. TSB RU88IAIK m JDRIANOPLE. 505
it Goarko advanced from the weat, while the victors of
Shipka, descending dne south throngh Kesanlik, barred
the line of retreat towards Adrianople. The last en-
counter of the war took place on the 17th of Januarf.
Soleimau'e army, routed and demoralised, succeeded in
making its escape to the .^Igean coast. Pursuit was un-
necessary, for the war was now practically over. On the
20th of January the Russians made their
entry into Adrianople; in the next few days AdriHDr>p"
their advanced guard touched the Sea of
Marmora at Bodosto.
Immediately after the fall of Flema the Forte had
applied to the European Powers for their mediation.
Disasters in Asia had already warned it not to delay
submission too long; for in the middle of October
Mukhtar Pasha had been driven from his positions, and
a month later Kars had been taken by storm. The
Bussians had subsequently penetrated into Armenia and
had captured the outworks of Erzeroum. Each day that
now passed brought the Ottoman Empire nearer to
destruction. Servia again declared war ; the Montene-
grins made themselves masters of the coast-towns and
of border-territory north imd south ; Greece seemed
likely to enter into the struggle. Baffled in his
attempt to gain the common mediation of the Powers,
the Sultan appealed to the Queen of England per-
sonally for her good offices in bringing the conflict
to a close. In reply to a telegram from
London, the Czar declared himself willing
to treat for peace as soon as direct communications should
5M MODEBir EJTBOFS. Wt
be addressed to his repTesentatiTes bj tbe Porte.
On the 14th of January commissioners were sent to
the headquarters of the Grand Duke Nicholas at
Kesanlik to treat for an armistice and for prelimin-
aries of peace. The Russians, now in the full tide of
victory, were in no hurry to agree with their adversary.
Nicholas bade the Turkish envoys accompany him to
Adrianople, and it was not until the Slst of January
that the armistice was granted and the preliminaries
of peace signed.
While the Turkish envoys were on their journey to
the Bussian headquarters, the session of Parliament
opened at London. The Ministry had declared at
the outbreak of the war that Great Britain
would remain neutral unless its own in-
terests should be imperilled, and it had defined these
interests with due clearness both in its communications
with the Russian Ambassador and in its ' statements in
Parliament. It was laid down that Her Majesty's
Government could not permit the blockade of the Suez
Canal, or the extension of military operations to f^pt ;
that it could not witness with indifference the passing of
Constantinople into other hands than those of its present
possessors; and that it would entertain serious ob-
jections to any material alterations in the rules made
under European section for the navigation of the
Bosphorufl and Dardanelles.* In reply to Lord Derby's
note which formulated these conditions of neutrality
Prince GortschakoET had repeated the Czar's assurance
• PwL Psp. 1877, yd. Ixnix., p. 138* ^
un AOTioJsr OF ENaunm. so?
that the acquisition of Constantinople was excluded
from his views, and bad promised to undertake no
military operation in Egjpt; he had, however, let it
be understood that, as an incident of warfare, the
reduction of C!onstantinopIe might be necessary like
that of any other capital. In the Queen's speech at
the opening of Parliament, Ministers stated that the
conditions on which the neutrality of England was
founded had not hitherto been infringed by either
belligerent, but that, should hostilities be prolonged,
some unexpected occurrence might render it necessary
to adopt measures of precaution, measures which could
not be adequately prepared without an appeal to the
liberality of Parliament. From language subsequently
used by Lord Beaconsfield's colleagues, it would appear
that the Cabinet had some apprehension that the
Russian army, escaping from the Czar's control, might
seize and attempt permanently to bold Constantinople.
On the 23rd of January orders were sent to' Admii^
Hornby, commander of the fleet at Besika Bay, to
pass tbe Dardanelles, and proceed to Constantinople.
liOrd Derby, who saw no necessity for measures of a
warlike character until the result of tbe negotiations
at Adrianople should become known, now resigned office ;
but on the reversal of the order to Admiral Hornby he
rejoined the Cabinet. On the 28th of January, after
the bases of peace had been communicated by Count
SchoavalofE to the British Government but before they
had been actually signed, the Chancellor of the Ex-
chequer moved for a vote of £6,000,000 for increasing
608 MODERN BUROPB. WK
the armaments of the couatry. This To£e was at fint
vigorously opposed on the ground that none of the
Totairfcndit, stated conditions ofBngland's neutrality had
jtt. S8-F=b. a. jjgg^ infringed, and that in the conditions of
peace between Eussia and Turkey there was uothiog that
justified a departure from the policy which England
had hitherto pursued. In the course of the debates,
however, a telegram arrived from Mr. Layard, Elliot's
Buccesaor at Constantinople, stating that notwith-
standing the armistice the Hussions were pushing on
towards the capital ; that the Turks had been com-
pelled to evacuate Silivria on the Sea of Marmora ;
that the Bassian general was about to occupy
Tchat^dja, an outpost of the last line of defence
not thirty miles from Constantinople; and that the
Porte was in great alarm, and unable to understand
the BuBsian proceedings. The utmost excitement was
caused at Westminster by this telegram. The fleet
was at once ordered to Constantinople.
Mr. Forster, who had led the opposition to
the vote of credit, sought to withdraw his
amendment ; and although on the following day, with
the arrival of the articles of the armistice, it appeared
that the Bossians were simply moving up to the
accepted line of demarcation, and that the Forte could
hardly have been ignorant of this when Lajard's tele-
gram was despatched, the alarm raised in London did
not subside, and the vote of credit was carried by a
majority of above two hundred.*
* PmL Pap., 1878, toL Ixxii., pp. 681, 725. Pwl Deb., toI csexxxriL
Mn. BUSBU AND GREAT BBITAIS. SOS
Wben a victorioiis army is, without the interTentiou
of some external Power, checked in its work of con-
quest by the negotiation of an armistice, it is invariably
made a condition that positions shall be handed over to
it which it does not at the moment occupy, but which
it might reasonably expect to have conquered within a
certain date, had hostilities not been suspended. The
armistice granted to Austria by Kapoleon after the
battle of Marengo involved the evacuation of the
whole of Upper Italy; the armistice which Bismarck
offered to the French Government of Defence at the
beginning of the siege of Paris would have involved the
surrender of Strasburg and of Toul. In demanding that
the line of demarcation should be carried almost up to
the walls of Constantinople the Eussiana were asking for
no more than would certainly have been within their
hands had hostilities been prolonged for a few weeks,
or even days. Deeply as the conditions of the armistice
agitated the English people, it was not in these con-
ditions, bnt in the conditions of the peace which was
to follow, that the true cause of contention between
England and Bussia, if cause there was, had to be
found. Nevertheless, the approach of the Eussians to
Gallipoli and the lines of Tchataldja,
followed, as it was, by the despatch of the wwiuiEiig-
British fleet to Constantinople, brought
Russia and Great Britain within a hair's breadth of
war. It was in vain that Lord Derby described the
fleet as sent only for the protection of the lives and
property of British subjects. Gortschakoff, who was
510 MODBRN BUBOPB. m
superior in amenities of tMs kind, leplied thai the
Russian Government bad exactly tlie same end in view,
with the distinction that its protection would be ex-
tended to all Christians. Should the British fleet
appear at the Bosphorus, Russian troops would, in the
fulfilment of a common duty of humanity, enter Con-
stantinople. Yielding to this threat. Lord Beaconsfield
bade the fleet halt at a convenient point in the Sea
of Marmora. On both sides preparations were made
for immediate action. The guns on oar ships stood
charged for battle ; the Bussians strewed the shallows
with torpedoes. Had a Russian soldier appeared on
the heights of G^lipoli, bad an Englishman l^ided on
the Asiatic shore of the Bosphorus, war would at once
have broken out. But after some weeks of extreme
danger the perils of mere contiguity passed away, and
the decision between peace and war was transferred
from the accidents of tent and quarter-deck to the
deliberations of statesmen assembled in Congress.
The bases of Peace which were made the condition
of the armistice granted at Adrianople formed with
little alteration the substance of the Treaty signed by
TMtrofau Russia and Turkey at San Stefano, a vil-
**'"°'""' *• la^ on the Sea of Marmora, on the 3rd of
March. By this Treaty the Porte recognised the in-
dependence of Servia, Montenegro, and Romuania, and
made conmderable cessions of territory to the two former
States. Bulgaria was constituted an autonomous
tributary Principality, with a Christian Government
and a national militia. Its frontier, which was made
urn TREATY OF SAN STSPASO. OX
so eitensiTe as to include the greater part of Earopean
Turkey, was defined as begiQuiug near Midia on the
Black Sea, not sixty miles from the Bosphorus; passing
thence westwards just to the north of Adrianople ; de-
sceudiug to the ^gean Sea, and following the coast as
tar as the Thracian Chersonese; then passing inland
westwards, so as barely to exclude Salonika ; running
on to the border of Albania within fifty miles of the
Adriatic, and from this point following the Albanian
border up to the new Servian frontier. The Prince of
Bulgaria was to be freely elected by the population,
and confirmed by the Porte with the assent of the
Powers; a system of administration was to be drawn
up by an Assembly of Bulgarian notables ; and the in-
troduction of the new system into Bulgaria with the
superintendence of its working was to be entrusted for
two years to a Bussian Commissioner. Until the native
militia was organised, Eussian troops, not exceeding
fifty thousand in number, were to occupy the country ;
this occupation, however, was to be limited to a term ap-
proximating to two years. In Bosnia and Herzegovina
the proposals laid before the Porte at the first sittlog
of the Conference of 1876 were to be immediately iutro-
duced, subject to such modifications as might be agreed
upon between Turkey, Russia, and Austria. The Porte
undertook to apply scrupulously in Crete the Oiganic
Ijaw which had been drawn up in 1868, taking into
account the previously expressed wishes of the native
population. An analogous law, adapted to local re-
quirements, was, after being communicated to tb$ Czar.
Kit MODSBN SVBOPa. wa
to be introdaced into Epims, Thesfuilj, and the other
parts of Turkey m Europe for which a special con-
stitution was not provided b}' the Treaty. Gom-
miBsioDS, in which the native population was to be
largely represented, were in each province to be en-
'busted with the task of elaborating the details of the
new oi^nisation. In Armenia the Sultan undertook
to carry into effect without further delay the improve-
ments and reforms demanded by local requirements,
and to guarantee the security of the Armenians from
Kurds and Circassians. As an indemnity for the losses
and expenses of the war the Porte admitted itself to be
indebted to Russia in the sum of fourteen hundred
million roubles ; but in accordance with the wishes of
the Sultan, and in consideration of the financial em-
barrassments of Turkey, the Czar consented to accept in
substitution for the greater part of this sum the cession
of the Dobrudscha in Burope, and of the districts -of
Ardahan, Kars, Batoum, and Bayuzid in Asia. As to
the balance of three hundred million roubles left due
to Kussia, the mode of payment or guaraQtee was to be
settled by an understanding between the two Govern-
ments. The Dubrudscha was to be given by the Czar
to Boumania in exchange for Bessarabia, which this
State was to transfer to Hussia. The complete evacua-
tion of Turkey in Europe was to take place within three
months, that of Turkey in Asia within six months,
from the conclusion of peace,*
It had from the first been admitted by the Russian
• The Treaty, with Jlaps, ia in Ftitl P«p. 1878, toL li^pji., p. 239.
MK oosansBS pbopossd. kis
QoTemnient that questions affecting the interests of
Europe at large could not be settled hj a Treaty
between Russia and Turkey alone, but ^^ ^^
must form the subject of European agree- """"^
ment. Early in February the Emperor of Austria had
proposed that a European Conference should assemble
at his own capital. It was subsequently agreed that
Berlin, instead of Vienna, should be the place of
meeting, and that instead of a Conference a Congress
should be held, that is, an international assembly of the
most solemn form, in which each of the Powers is repre-
sented not merely by an ambassador or an envoy but by
its leading Ministers. But the question at once arose
whether there existed in the mind of the Russian Govern-
ment a distinction between parts of the Treaty of San
Stefano bearing on the interests of Europe generally aud
parts which affected no States but Russia and Turkey;
and whether, in this case, Russia was willing that
Europe should be the judge of the distinction, or, on
the contrary, claimed for itself the right of withholding
portions of the Treaty from the cognisance of the
European Court. In accepting the prin-
ciple of a Congress, Lord Derby ou behalf po^.^'if^
of G-reat Britain made it a condition that
every article of the Treaty without exception should be
laid befbre the Congress, not necessarily as requiring
the concurrence of the Powers, but in order that the
Powers themselves might in each case decide whether
their concurrence was necessary or not. To this de-
mand Prince Gortschakoff offered the most strenuous
H M
5U KODERN SVBOFS. jm
resistance, daiming tor Russia the liberty of accepting,
or not accepting, the discussion of anj question that
might be raised. It would clearly have been in the
power of the Eussian Gk)vernment,,had this condition
been granted, to exclude from the consideration of
Europe precisely those matters which in the opinion
of other States were most essentially of European
import. Phrases of conciliation were suggested ; but
no ingenuity of laaguage could shade over the dif-
ference of purpose which separated the riral Powers.
Every day the chances of the meeting of the Congress
seemed to be diminishing, the approach of war between
Kussia and Great Britain more unmistakable. Lord
fieaconsfield called out the Reserves and summoned
troops from India ; even the project of seizing a port
in Asia Minor in case the Sultan should fall under
jRussian infiuence was discussed in the Cabinet. Un-
able to reconcile himself to these vigorous measures.
Lord Derby, who had long been at variance with the
Premier, now finally withdrew from the Cabinet
(March 38). He was succeeded in his office by the
Marquis of Salisbury, whose comparison of his relative
and predecessor to Titus Oates revived the interest
of the diplomatic world in a now forgotten period of
English history.
The new Foreign Secretary had not been many
days in office when a Circular, despatched to all the
Foreign Courts, summed up the objections of Great
Britain to the Treaty of San Stefano. It onoirM
was pointed out that a strong Slavic State *****
■oogle
Wa tOBD BAMBBTTRTB OmOULAS. 515
wotild be created under the control of Bussia, possessing
important harbours upon the shores of the Black Sea
and the Archipelago, and giving to Bussia a prepon-
derating influence over political and commercial re-
lations on both those seas ; that a large Greek popula-
tion would be merged in a dominant Slavic majority ;
that by the extension of Bulgaria to the Arehipel^o
the Albanian and Greek provinces left to the Sultan
would be severed from Constantinople ; that the an-
nexation of Bessarabia and of Batoum would make
the will of the Russian Government dominant over all
the vicinity of the Black Sea ; that the acquisition of
the strongholds of Armenia would place the population
of that province under the immediate influence of the
Power that held these strongholds, while throngh the
cession of Bayazid the European trade from Trebizond
to Persia would become liable to be arrested by the
prohibitory barriers of the Russian commercial system.
Finally, by the stipulation for an indemnity which it
was beyond the power of Turkey to discharge, and by
the reference of the mode of payment or guamntee
to a later settlement, Russia had placed it in its power
either to extort yet larger cessions of territory, or to
force Turkey into engagements subordinating its policy
in all things to that of St. Petersburg.
It was the object of Lord Salisbury to show that
the effects of the Treaty of San Stefano, taken in a
mass, threatened the peace and the interests of Europe,
and therefore, whatever might be advanced for or
f^aiost individual stipulations of the Treaty, that the
sie iK>DSSN EUBOPa. ■&
Treai^ as a whole, and not claasea selected by one
Power, must be submitted to the Congress if the
examination was not to prove illusory. This was a
just line of argument. Nevertheless it was natural to
suppose that some parts of the Treaty must be more
distasteful than others to Great Britain; and Count
OMmtsciboan- Schouvaloff, who was siucerely desirous of
''"■ ptace, applied himself to the task of dis-
covering with what concessions Lord Beaconsfield's
Cabinet would he satisfied. He found that if Russia
would consent to modifications of the Treaty in Congress
excluding Bulgaria from the .^gean Sea, reducing its
area on the south and west, dividing it into two
provinces, and restoring the Balkans to the Sultan as
a military frontier, giving back Bayazid to the Turks,
and granting to other Powers besides Russia a voice
in the organisation of Kpirus, Thessaly, and the other
Christian provinces of the Porte, Engluid might be
induced to accept without essential change the other
provisions of San Stefano. On the 7th of May Count
Schouvaloff quitted London for St. Petershu]^, in order
to lay before the Czar the results of his communi-
cations with the Cabinet, and to acquaint him with
the state of public opinion in England. On his
journey hung the issues of peace or war. Backed by
the counsels of the German Emperor, SchouraloCE
succeeded in his mission. The Czar determined not
to risk the great results already secured by insisting
on the points contested, and Schouvaloff returned
to London antho]rts?d to eoncliidd ft pact with the
UK TBB BBOBST AOREEMBlfT. £17
British QovernmeDt on the general basis which had
been laid down. On the 30th of May a seoiiet ^ree-
ment, in which the above were the princi- B«™t««»
pal points, was signed, and the meeting of '"**"^«''
the Congress for the examination of the entire Treaty
of San Stefaao was now assured. But it was not
without the deepest anxiety and regret that Iiord
Beaconsfield consented to the annexation of Batoum
and tbe Armenian fortresses. He obtained indeed an
assurance in the secret ^reement with Schouvaloff
that the Kussian frontier should be no more extended
on the side of Turkey in Asia ; but his policy did not
stop short here. By a Convention made with the Sultan
on the 4th of June, Great Britain eng^ed, onmniioiiwiai
in the event of any further aggression by ^''"^"'■'"•*'
Bussia upon the Asiatic territories of the Sultan, to
defend these territories by force of arms. The Sultan
in return promised to introduce the necessary reforms,
to be ^reed upon by the two Powers, for the protection
of the Christian and other subjects of the Forte in these
territories, and further assigned the Island of Cyprus
to be occupied and administered by Eng-
land. It was stipulated by a humorous
after-dause that if Bussia should restore to Turkey its
Armenian conquests, Cyprus would be evacuated by
England, and the Convention itself should be at an
end.*
The Congress of Berlin, at which the Premier
himself and Lord Salisbury represented Great Britain,
•Fari.Fi^I878,TLlsizii,p.3 Ofobe. Utf 81, 1878. H>hB,liL116.
S18 XOBBSS BtmOPW. M&
opened on the 13th of Jane. Though the compromise
between Dngland and Enssia had been settled in
general tenns, the arrangement of det^ls opened snch
a Beries of difficulties that the Congress seemed more
than once on the point of breaking up. It
^^^mu was mainly das to the perseverance and
wisdom of Prince Bismarck, who transferred
the disoussion of the most crucial points from the
Congress to private meetings of his guests, and who
himself acted as conciliator when Oortschakofi folded
up his maps or Lord Beaconsfield ordered a special
train, that the work was at length achieved. The
Treaty of Berlin, signed on the 13th of July, confined
Bulgaria, as an autonomous Principality, to the country
TmtTot Bttua, ^orth of the Balkaus, and diminished the an-
joiiis. thority which, pending the establishment
of its definitive system of government, would by
the Treaty of San Stefano have belonged to a Hussiaa
commissioner. The portion of Bulgaria south of the
Balkans, but extending no farther west than the
valley of the Maritza, and no farther south than
Mount Bhodope, was formed into a Province of East
Boumelia, to remain subject to the direct political
and military authority of the Sultan, under con-
ditions of administrative autonomy. The Sultan was
declared to possess the right of erecting fortifications
both on the coast and on the land-frontier of this
province, and of maintfuning troo}» there. Alike in
Bulgaria and in Eastern Boumelia the period of occu-
pati<m by Bussian troops was Unuted to nine mooths.
un. TREATY OF BSBLm. S19
Bosnia and Herzegovina were banded over to Aostxia,
to be occupied and administered by that Power. The
cessions of territory made to Servia and Montenegro in
the Treaty of San Stefano were modified with the
object of interposing a broader strip between these two
States ; Bayazid was omitted from the ceded districts
in Asia, and the Czar declared it his intention to erect
Batotun into a fre« port, essentially commercial. At
the instance of France the provisions relating to the
Greek Provinces of Turkey were superseded by a vote
in £kvour of the cession of part of these Provinces to
the Hellenic Kingdom. The Sultan was recommended
to cede Thessaly and part of Epiros to Ghreece, the
Powers reserving to themselves .the right of offering
their mediation to &cilitate the negotiations. In
other respects the provisions of the Treaty of San
Stefano were confirmed without substantial change.
Lord Beaconsfield returned to London, bringing, as he
said, peace with honour. It was claimed, in the despatch
to our Ambassadors which accompanied the publication
of the Treaty of Berlin, that in this Treaty the cardinal
objections raised by the British Government to the
Treaty of San Stefano had found an entire remedy.
"Bulgaria," wrote Lord Salisbury, "is now confined
to the river-barrier of the Danube, and
consequently has not only ceased to possess
any harbour on the Archipelago, but is removed hy
more than a hundred miles from the neighboorhood
fiSO MODBBIf SUSOPB, H&
of that sea. On the Eaxine the important port oi
Boui^as has been restored to the Government of
Turkey ; and Bulgaria retains less thui half the sea-
board originally assigned to it, and possesses no other
port except the roadstead of Varna, which can hardly
be used for any but commercial purposes. The re-
placement under Turkish rule of Bourgas and the
southern half of the sea-board on the Euxine, and the
strictly commercial character assigned to Batoum, have
largely obviated the menace to the liberty of the Black
Sea. The political outposts of Bussian power have
been pushed back to the r^on beyond the Balkans ;
the Sultan's dominions have been provided with a de*
fensible frontier." It was in short the contention
of the English Government that while Russia, in the
pretended emancipation of a great part of European
Turkey by the Treaty of San Stefano, had but ac-
quired a new dependency, England, by insisting on the
division of Bulgaria, bad baffled this plan and restored
to Turkey an eficotive military dominion over all the
country south of the Balkans. That Lord Beaconsfield
did well in severing Macedonia from the Slavic State of
Bulgaria there is little reason to doubt ; that, having so
severed it, he did ill in leaving it without a European
guarantee for good government, every snccessive year
made more plain; the wisdom of his treatment of Bul-
garia itself must, in the light of subsequent events,
i-emain matter for controversy. It may &irly be said
that in dealing with Bulgaria English statesmen were,
on the whole, dealing with the unknown. Nevertheless,
tah T^^ DTVmiOK OF SPLGARtA. 5»
had guidance been accepted from the history of the other
Balkan Stax;e8, analogies were not altogether wanting
or altogether remote. During the present century
three Christian States had been formed out of what
had been Ottoman territory : Servia, Greece, and
Eoumania. Not one of these had become a Bussian
Province, or had failed to develop and maintain a
distinct national existence. In Servia an attempt had
been made to retain for the Forte the right of keeping
troops in garrison. This attempt had proved a mis-
take. So long as the right was exercised it had simply
been a source of danger and disquiet, and it had finally
been abandoned by the Forte itself. In the case of
Greece, Eussia, with a view to its own interests, had
originally proposed that the country should be divided
ii.to four autonomous provinces tributary to the Sultan :
against this the Greeks had protested, and Canning
had successfully supported their protest. Even the
appointment of an ex-Minister of St. Petersbui^, Capo-
distrias, as first President of Greece in 1827 had failed to
bring the liberated country under Bussian infiuence; and
in the course of the half-centuiy which had since elapsed
it had become one of the commonplaces of politics,
accepted by every school in every country of Western
Europe, that the Powers had committed a great error
in 1833 in not extending to far larger dimensions the
Greek Kingdom which they then established. Ta the
case of Boumania, the British Government had, out of
fear of Bussia, insisted in 1856 that the provinces of
Moldavia and Wallachia should remain separate: the
en HODSBN EUSOPK HTiL
reaolt was that the inhabitants in defiance of England
effected their onion, and that after a few years had
passed there was not a single politician in England
who regarded their onioa otherwise than with satis-
faction. If histoiy tanght anything in the solation
of the Eastern question, it taught that the effort to
reserve for the Saltan a military existence in conntries
which had passed from under his general control was
futile, and that the Jjest barrier against Bnssian in-
fluence was to be found not in the division but in
the strengthening and consolidation of the States
rescued from Ottoman dominions.
It was of course open to English statesmen in 1878
to believe that all that had hitherto passed in the
Balkan Peninsula bad no bearing upon the problems of
the hour, and that, whatever might have been the case
with Greece, Servia, and Eoumania, Bulgaria stood on
a completely different footing, and called for the appli-
cation of principles not based on the experience of the
past but on the divinations of superior minds. Should
the history of succeeding years bear out this view,
should the Balkans become a true military frontier for
Turkey, should Northern Bulgaria sink to the condition
o£ a Russian dependency, and Eastern Roumelia, in
severance from its enslaved kin, abandon itself to a
thriving ease behind the garrisons of the reforming
Ottoman, Lord Beaconsfield will have deserved the
fame of a statesman whose intuitions, undimmed by
the mists of experience, penetrated the secret of the
future, and shaped, because they discerned, the destiny
un. VSmiT OF BVLaABZA. 223
of nations. It will he the task of later historians to
measore the exact period after the Congress of Berlin
at which the process indicated by Lord Beaconsfield
came into visible operation ; it is the misfortune of
those whose view is limited by a single decade to have
to record that in every particular, with the single ex-
ception of the severance of Macedonia from the
Slavonic Principality, Lord Beaconsfield's ideas, pur-
poses, and anticipations, in so f^* as they related to
IBastem Europe, have hitherto been contradicted by
events. What happened in Greece, Servia, and Eou-
mania has happened in Bulgaria. Experience, thrown
to the winds by English Ministers in 1878, has justified
those who listened to its voice. There exists no such
thing as a Turkish fortress on the Balkans ; Bourgas
no more belongs to the Sultan than Athens or Bel-
grade ; no Torkish soldier has been able to set foot
within the territoiy whose very name. Eastern Rou-
melia, was to stamp it as Turkish dominion. National
independence, a living force in Greece, in Servia, in
Roumania, has proved its power in Bulgaria too. The
efforts of Bussia to establish its influence over a people
liberated by its arms have been repelled witb unex-
pected firmness. Like the divided members of Bou-
niania, the divided members of Bulgaria have eifected
their union. In this union, in the growing material
and moral force of the Bulgarian State, Western Europe
sees a power wholly favourable to its own hopes for the
future of the East, wholly adverse to the extension of
RussiMi rule: and it baa been reserved for Lord
au KODSm SVHOPM. unl
Beaconfifield's colleague at the Congress of Berlin.
regardless of tlie fact that Bulgaria north of the
Balkans, not the southern Province, created that
vigorous military and political organisation which
was the precursor of national union, to explain that
in dividing Bulgaria into two portions the English
Ministers of 1878 intended to promote its ultimate
unity, and that in subjecting the southern half to
the Sultan's rule tbej laid the foundation for its
ultimate independence.
D,a,l,zc.bvG00gIe
INDEX.
AMalliih, Faaha of Acre; qnanel wiU)
Viceroy of Egypt, ii **2
Abdul Hedjid, aucceedti Mahmad H.
u Saltan of Turkey, U. *5i
Abercrombj, Sir Bslph, Britiah ad-
mii&l, i. 195,235
Alierdenii, Lord ; despatchoe on the
battle 0( Laipiig, i- 619 (note);
(Foreiffn Beerolary, 1840), declines
to uasnt to the proposed Spanish
Diarrisgcs, ii. 604 ; fricnilsbip to-
wudi the Emperor Nicholaa, iii.
182; policy tovnrda Russia and
Turkey !I853), 193; refuBOS King
Fredericli William's requost tor a
guarantee agsinat an attack from
francs, 203; reaignation ef pro-
miership, 219
Abisbal ; bit conspiraoy in the atmy
of CHdii, ii. 173
Abouldr, Bonaparte'* rictory OW
Turks at, i. 200; Lmding (4
English troops at, 235
Acre, Siege of, ii. 443 ; captured by
Sir Cbarle« Napier, 460 _^
Acts Additionnel (France), ii. 43
Adana, given to Vicen^ of Egypt by
Turkey, ii. 446
Addington, Mr., Speaker of the House
of Commots, i. 240 ; hia govem-
msnt'a hostility to Bonaj
lettd* a wctioa of the 1
Sll
Adrianopls, Peace of, ii. 313; entry
i. 606
MgsBB lilMida, u. 247, 287
A^randiBoment, ScliBinea of, advanced
by Enropean alliM (1793), L 77, 78
Agram, iiL SB, 87, 69
Aiz-Ia-CIbap^, Conference of, il. 131
Albert FMnch Bepnblican; excluded
from National Assembly, iii. 18
Albrecht, Archdoke, iii. 400
Albueta, Battle of, i. 447
AleB«mdm,L 182, 221
Alexander I., Emperoi of Busna, i.
232; pacific propoaali to England,
233; secret treaty Trithftanoe
(1801), 251 ; distrust of Bonaparte,
274 ; rupture of diplomatia rela-
tionj with Bonaparte, 378: treaty
with £ing of Pruaeia at Potsdam,
292 ; seeks t^ help of England
against France, 343 ; cordial nila-
tione with the Sing of Prosaia,
344 ; mterviBw with Napoleon on
the Niemen, 348 ; oonepiracy with
Napoleon, 348; meeU ^apoleon at
Erfurt, 390 ; breaks off friendly re-
lations with Napoleon, 442 ; de-
clines to aaaiat Prussia against
France, 458 ; summons Stein to
St. Petersburg, 480; eaten the
War of Liboration against Napo-
leon, 501 : orriral at Frankfort,
617; insists on Napoleon's de-
thronement, 523 ; arrives in Paris
■nd secures the restoration of Louis
XVIII., 631, G33; at the Congreea
of Vienna, iu 22; arrives in Paris
after BatUe o£ Waterloo, 60 ; Trea^
of Holy Alliance, 63 ; addressee
Polish Diet on his deeign to extend
popular representation, 129; raises
alum in Germany by distribntiog
Stourdza's psmphlet on revolution-
ary movement^ 1 38 ; sale of rotten
ships to Bpaia, 171 ; proposes joint
Bctiunvith regard to Spain (1820),
189 ; his views with regard to
Austrian intervention in Italy, 194;
proposes to send troops te Spain to
overthrow the Constitation, 213 ;
intervention in Turkey on behalf
of the Christians, 277, 278 ; his re-
fusal to aid the Greeks rausee dis-
content in Husaia, 315; death
(1826), and chancter, 317, 318
Alexander II,, Emperor ofBussia, no-
oeeda Uie T " - — ■ • -
esa
XODSRN svaojps.
«20; libvatai the Beib, S30;
mMting at BeicluUdt witii tha
Emparor I^raneU JoMph on tho
Eutecn OiuatioD, «8S; uuuuCM
to Britain raapecting the icqaiii^
tion <d OonaUntinople, ISO
Alaxudrift ; capitnlation by the Freodi
to ths English, L 236
Almdniiti, CKptoTs of, b^ ths Turki,
iiL48B
Alfleri.Vittorio, 1.11*. 117
Algion ; csptoied by France, iL S6T
All Paaha, ii. Si2, ^64, 286, 295
Alkmaar, Battle of, i. 106
AllvinUy, Anatrian g^neiiil, dBfeatad
by Bonaparto at Biroli, L 13$
Alma, BattU of the, iii. 21 )
Alaace, Oarman rights in, i. 12 : Franoa,
fatberlBiKl of, fiO ; declared to be
£>ench territory by Congreas of
Vienna, ii. 70; probable conae-
qnencei had it been anDeied to
Prtian*, 72 j dril goTemment
eatoblitbed by Oermana during
tiie Franoo-FruBMan war, iii. 463 \
ceded to G^many by the Tnuties
of Yeimillw and FranlLfort, 464
Altona; diioantent with Daninli rols,
iii. 28, SO
Amioni, Treaty of, i. 238 ; npitolate*
to the PniBsiana, iii. 4GEI
Anooim, Surrender ofj to troopa of
Victor Emnianiiel, iii. 294
AndrbBsy. Count, ne^tintea reroncilia-
tion betweea Austria and Hungary
(1867), iii. 391, 302; opinion on
projected reatoration of Gterman
leadership to AiiBtria, 406 ; coni'
nonicat^ with SL Petersburg and
Berlin on a iins tA policy tovardi
the Porte, 4TS
"Andiiasy Note, The," iii. 478
AngoulSme, Ducheaa of, L 634, ii. G9,
SS, 114
Angaul§me, Duks of, leadi the French
troopa in the inTasiou of Spain
(1S231, ii. 219
Antonelh, Cardinal, minuter d Fioa
IX.,iii. 110, 273
Antony, Prince, agipDinted Praarian
prime minister, lii. 306
Antwerp, taken ^ the French, i. 93 ;
failnra of English expedition
against, 428; bombardment by
BWch and English, 38S
Apoatolioala {Sm (Elista
Areola, Battle of, i. 134
Anlaban, iii. 612
Annatoii, 116,11.247
Azmiitice, between France and Sar-
dinia (1796), L 119; Boouparte
and King of Naples (I79S), 123;
Bonaparte and the Fope(17e6), 123 ;
Duke of Wiirtemberg and tha
French (1796), 127; Naplea and
France (1796), 17G ; Austria and
Fiance (ISOO), 222; (secret) Em-
peror of Austna and Ftenoe (1800),
223 ; Austria and Vitxux at Steyer
(ISOO), 226; England and Den-
mark (1891), 232; Ansbia and
France after the Battle of
Austerliti (1806), 297 ; Bnaaia
and Ktance after the BatUe of
Friedland (ISOT), :14G ; Znaim
(1809). Austria and Franca, 426;
France, Biisaia, and Prussia (1813),
496 ; Austria and Sardinia at
Vigerano (181S], iii. 62; U&lmo,
Denmark and Frunia (1843), 1 17 ;
Garibaldi and the Meapolitana
(I860), 286; Denmark, Aostria,
and Prnasia (1864), 861 ; Fnnoo
and Fniasia (1871), 463; Serrim
and Turkey (1876), 489
Amaud, St., French officer, conspirea
with Louis Napoleon against the
goieinment, iii. 187—169 ; French
commander in the Crimea, 211.
Amdt, the German poet, i. 407 ; pn>>
■ecntion of, ii. 148; member of
German National Assembly, ill. 32 ;
Song of the " FaOierland," U.y i«-
tires from National Assembly, 137
Artnis, Count of (afterwards Charlea
X.), i. 274, 631, iL 13; heada tha
poi-ty of reaction in 1816 in Franca^
91 ; growth of his par^, 94 ; am-
bitiotis projects, 160 {St* alao
Charles X.)
Asia Uinor, conquered by Egyptian*
. under Ibrahim, ii. 443
Aspem, BatUe of, i. 421
Asturias; papular rising against tha
French, i. 380.
Athoa, Monka of Uount, iL 3S6
AuerEtiidt, Battle of, i. 329
Augereau, French general, attacka
the Duectory, i. 146
Auguslenbarg, Duke of (alder), t^
nounces M» claims in Bchleawig-
Holstein, iii. 343.
Augustenburg, Duke of (younger) ;
Bismarck proposes that tha orown
of Sdiileawig-HolRtein should ba
conferred upon tha, 817
AoTelle de Fahulinca, Frmush gencisl,
advanoaa to the relief at fan*, iii.
457
Anatmlits, &tlla of, i. SB8
Aiutxia, Dedanition af war bj Fnutce
■gainst (179^J, i. 3 ; ultiEnatum to
Franca, 12; aUU of, before tha
Witr of 1792, IB — 30; teCorma
of Huia Theresa, Zl ; refornu ol
Joseph II. in, 22 ; umler I«opo!il
IL, 25; under Prancis II., 27;
steied for territory in, 29 ; opoo-
IDK of v&r against France, i 1 ;
■iSed to FnisBia, 42 ; defeute
Premchat Neerwinden, 68 ; Bchemsi
of ■ggntndisement, 76 ; invoetA
Oambray and 1a Quesnof , 78 ;
defeated at Wattigniea, 81 ; in-
difference to English plana for
Bourbon Testoratian, B6 ; breach
with Frunsia after the partition of
Poland, 86 ; delcaled by French at
"WBrth and WeiBsenhtirg, 87; de-
feated by Bonaparte on the Miocio,
132; retires before tlie French ia
Italy, 12S; invaded by the French,
128 ; treaty with France at Leoben,
1S8; l^vatyof CampoFonnio with
France, 117 ; renewal of war with
France, 177; defeata France at
Btockach and Magnano, 179, 181 ;
deeiEns in Italy, 185 ; jealousy to-
wards Russia, 192 [noto) ; end of
alliance with Russia, 19&; reply
to Bonaparte's propoaal for peace,
21S; resumption of hostilities with
Fiance, 217; defeated at Hohen-
linden, 225 ; intereets in Qennony,
249; Itate in 1805, 282— 2B3;
ocouines Bavaria, 287; suTTeader'
of army to the French at TJlm,
289; the French occupy Vienna,
293 ; defeated at Ansterlitz, 200 ;
low of territory, 300; prepares
for war against France, 402 ; in-
vasion of Bavana, 410 ; defeated
ly Napoleon at landshut and
^fgmBhl, 41£ ; Napoleon enters
Vienna, 41S; conqiieats in Poland
•ad Italy, 417 ; defeats the French
■t Aspem, 421 ; defeated by Napo-
leon at Wogram, 42S ; peace with
France, 430 ; Icweea by the Peace
of Vienna, 430 ; alliance with
NaptJeoD, 460 ; attitnde townrdg
Napoleon in 1813, 496 ; Trcity of
Beichenbach, 49S; enters the war
agsinn France, GOl ; defeated at
Dresden, 605 ; reeulta of Napoleon's
«*T^ 645 ; its gains by the Settle-
ment of 1814, ii. 4; Congreos of
'nenaa, 20—31, 38; Hetteimch'a
ittlomanahip, 82 — 86; the Em-
peror's retistanco to mogttat, 82 ;
Conference of Aix-lo-Chapelle, 131
— 133; -CiMuerTatiTe principles of
Mettemich, 135; picposad inter-
vention in Italy, 192; invadea
Italy, aoi; policy towards Tur-
key in 1821, 279; intarrentioa
in Papal States for suppiessiou ot
revolt (1831), 402 ; second inter-
vention in Papal SUtes, 404 ; with*
draws from Papal States (1838),
476-482; death of the Emperor
Francis Joseph, and accession of
Ferdinand, 482 ; rural system in
Hungary, 491 ; insurrection of
Poles in Galicia, 493 ; Rural l^ct
(1846], 494; revolution at Vienna,
1848, iu. 6 ; fall of Mettemich, 8 ;
Hungarian dopittiition received by
the Emperor, 9 ; accepts Hun-
garian schema of independence,
11 ; autonomy promised to Bohemia,
14 ; insorroction in Lombardy and
Venice, 15, 16; g«Denl war ia
Italy agitinst Austrian rule, 17, 18;
Constitution pablished, 50 ; af^ta-
tation in Vienna, ii.; flight of the
Emperor, 52 ; fnrCher riot4 ot
students and workmen, 52, 53 ;
riota nt Prague, G4 ; campaign
around Verona, 55 ; re-conqutst of
Vcnetia, 60 ; Emperor returns to
Vieima from Innsbruck, S2;
revolt in Croatia, 63—69 ; Emperor
diBEolves Hun^aiian Parliament,
aniL declares ltd acts null and void,
74; tumult at Vienna, 76; flight
of the Emperor to Olmlitz, 77;
Oeneral Windischgrali subdues the
re\-oIt at Vienna, 73 ; abdication of
the Emperor, and accession of hii
nephew Francis .Joseph I., 81 ;
the Unitary Constitutional Edict
(March, 1849), 83 ; occupation of
Festh, 86; Constitution publiahod
by Schwapjenberg, 88; driven from
Hungary, 88 ; subdues Hungnry,
96 ; ovDrthrowB Sardinian army at
Novara,IOO;Burrenderof Venice to,
112 ;.propoBcd connection with Qer-
mony at the Frankfort Parliament,
127 ; refuBca to recognise the (iur-
man Foderal Union, 142 ; propose*
a conference at Frankfort to discuss
question ot union, 143; restores the
Diet of Frankfort, 145; conflict
with ProBsiB respecting affairs in
Heaie-CaiHel, 145—148; demands
JfODBEW stmops.
BTB gnntfld b; Pnuna tMpecting:
Heme, 1*7; oondition after 1851,
IM — 1C4; oonceuioiu to the Pa-
P«ev, 15t;polic7 towkrd<Riusi&oii
oDtbnak (rf Criiuaai) W&r, 300;
Oonferance of Vieniia, May, ISGG,
231 1 mediatM I>etweei) BosbU and
£urope*n lUiee after full of
Bebwtopol, 22S ; its govemment of
OeDtral and Southern Italy do-
noimced by Oonnt OaTour at the
Paril Conference, 246; rupture
nilb SardinU, 2fil ; deckrstion
of irai by FnuiM and Sardinia,
25S; defeated at the BatUea of
Magenta and Solferina, 261, 2S3;
peace concluded with. France
and Sacdinia at Villafianca, ^SG;
oppoBLtion to the union of Itaiy
nnder Victor Emmanuel, 298
itat« of affain after 186S, and croa
tion of Central Council, 322, 323
diploma publiebed for restoring U
Hungary its eld Constitution, 324 .
Hungat7 remets the eatabliahment
of a Central Council, 32«; the
BoichHrath Msemblei at Vienna
(1861), 327 ; prognw of Parlia-
mentary Bystcm, 328 ; troops enter
Schleewig conjamtly with the
Frnsuani, 8G0; Mcurta fichltswig-
Holstoin in conjunction with PruB-
aia by the Troaty of Vienna, 353 i
refusoa to attend proponed Euro-
pean OongreBS, and bids the
Federal Diet take over the oon-
trol of Schte»wig.HoUteii
S70;
,t of n
irith
Prussia, 373; defeated by Prussia
at Euniggriitz, 876 ; victoriee of
CiutoKZ-a and Lissa, 377 ; terms of
peace with I'ramin (1866), 376-37D ;
■ettlement of conflict with Hungor/
aft«r the Battle of KoniggriitE,
3S7-3»2; defeneiTe allianoe witb
Italy, 410; " Longue of the Hiree
Emperors," 476; treaty with
RuBsiaat Beicbstadt on the Eastern
Question, 4S8 ; acquires Bosnia
and Herzegovina at the Congtess of
Berlin, S18
Avignon, Claims of the Pope in, L
AKglio, Sardinian minister, iii. 243 ;
onvoy to Bologna, 262 ; providea
lot the defence of Ilomamia Bftainst
Austria, 267; Admiral Perwno
K-len hiB diarr to, 282 (nolo) ;
Jiewa ropirding- ozcliuion of Rone
from ItaBan KSigdom, 3a» ^^
1, Akmndw (Aostriaa i
"**
negotiates the Concordat with tb*
Papacy, iii. 16fi
Badajox, Cbptnra «f^ bf tha Doke
ol^ Wellington, L 44S
Baden, entered by Fteneh troops, L
127 ; formaiian ol a CbnMitntian,
ii. 144 ; Xdbeial imUnmnij of the
■overeigD, 411 ; Rqinlilican riaiiig
(1848), iii. 30 ; insurvectuMi (Sept-
ember, 1848), I19;thegoveRinieiit
of the Qraiid Dhjko aooepts the
FrHuUoit ConstitntiiHi, 188; Be-
publican insuirectjon, ii., 138 ;
insurrection qnelled by Pmanaii
troops after fall of Baatadt, 138
Bagtation, Prince, Ruadan camman-
dsr, L 482, 4S4
Baird, General, L 236, 396
BaTadd, iii. 498
Balaolava, iii. 113; BatUe at IIS;
Chiwe of the Light Brigade bL
21S
Balance of Towta in Qermany, i. 40 ;
in Europe after the TiMty «f
Baale, 67 ; after the Engliih rio-
toriet in ERTpt, 237; Austrian
defence of, 404
Balearic Islands, offered by Napolem
to GlrMt Britain, i. 368
Balkani, Bueeian advance on the, iii.
49S
Bnpaume, iii. 459
Barclay de Tolly, Boaaiaii coainuuider,
i. 4fl2, 464, 466, 467
Baring, Hr., Secretary of English
Legation at Constantinaple ; report
on Bulgarian iiiiiiimi iiii. iiu 4S2
Barraa, M., French Director, L 199,
203
Barthelemy, H., mtoibec of French
Directory, i. 144 ; seiied by Ange-
reau's troops, 146; ambaaaadta at
Beme, 160
Biisle, Treaty of, L 90
Biuique Prorioces, centre of Carbst
rebellion (1834), ii. 431 ; immoni^
from ciutoms-duee, 432
Bastille, The, L 44
Baloum, iii. 612
Batthy&ny, Count, instructed to form
a National Ministry in Hungary,
iiL 10 ; publiahea Emperor of
Austria's onler suspeading Jellacie
from office, 6S; resigns office, 73;
sentenced to death, 96
" BatUe of the Nations " (Leipaig), I
daagna of n«iiaa n. on, 28 ; entered
by fVencli tioops, 127; traitywitb
Brmapnite, 2S0; retorma mulor
Uont^sltu, 255 ; oocupiod by the
AlutniuiB, 287 ; inTnded by Aui-
trianB, 410 ; surrenden Iimabruck
to the TyroIeAe, 413 ; Dfataiiu Balt-
boiv, 430 ; Joins the Alliel in War
of Lilienition, fill ; fongation of
k Conatitution, iL 144 ; dinturb-
Bnce in tlie Palatiiute, 408
Bajazid, iii. 612, G13
Baj-len, Capitulation of, i. 384
BayQnne, meeting of Napoleoa tnd
Friuoe Ferdinand of Spain, i. 376;
Mkpoleon's Spanish Assembly, 380
Buoine, Maiehol, French commander
of the «rmy at the Khioe, iii. 438,
4S9 ; defeated by the PmiuianB at
MaiB-la-Tour, 440; defeated at
OniTelolte, 441 ; retiree with
>nny to Metz, 442 ; inaction at
Uets, and probable intrigaes for
ranaiud power, 464 ; mrreDders
Heti to the Prussians, 4GS ; tried
by couzt-martial and eenteoced to
death, a. ; tha Nemeds of the
moral indifference and aervility of
the French Empire, 457
Beaconsfield, Lord, Enntom Policy
and distruat of Boasia, iii. 4S4 —
4S7 ; war-Bpeech at Ouildhidl ban-
quet, 491 ; represents tlngland,
with Lord Salisbury, at the Con-
fess of Berlin, 517; policy in
BeTering- Macedonia from Bulgaria,
620 ; his anticipations relative to
Eastern Europe 80 far contindicted,
623
" Crimea ud Punish-
ments," L 1 1 3
BeethoTen entertains memben of the
Congress of Vienna, iL 21
Belcredi, Cknut, Austrian minister, iii.
387
Bslgiam, under Austria, L GO; Trench
Tictories, 92 ; nnitod to Holland at
Oongreas of Vienna, ii. 70; reTolO'
Fhuice and TaUeyrand, 384,
independenoe reoognised I^ the
Oonferenoe of London, 38S ; Dae
dn Nemoim elected king. Bod
shortly rutircs at the instigation of
Lonia Philippe, 387; Prince Leopold
of Sazu-Cobo^ elected king, ii. ;
i I
settlement of (he frontier, 388;
project of francs for its acquisi-
tion, iii. 3S4; proposal to cede
Belgic territory to France in return
for iiUiemburg, 403
Bolliard, Fnnch general, i. 236
Bom, llun^irian genertj, defeats the
Aostrians, iii. 89 ; defeated by
Anstriuns at Temesvar, 9a
Benedok, Austrian general, iii. 263,
374 : doatmttion of his aim^ at
EBni^gratz, 376
Benedetti, Count, French ambassador
at Berlin, report on the French
project for the acquisition of Bel'
gium, iii. 384, 386, note ; inter,
view with tha King ot Prussia at
Kms respecting the candidature of
of Prince Leopold for the Bpanislk
throne, 413
Bennigsen, GnssiaQ general, L 341;
defeated by t)ie French at Fried-
land, 316; leads tbe Russiiia re-
aerre* during the Wai of libera-
tion, G12
Bentinck, Lord W., on Untat's da-
plicity. i. 637, note ; English
repcesentatiTe in SicUy; forces
King Ferdinand to establish a
Parliament, ii. 87
Bonvenuti, Oardinal, ii. 400, 404
B^rangcr on Bonaparte's return to
Fiance, i. 201 ; Napoleonio lyrics
Bereeford, English oommander in
Portugal, ii. 1S6
BerGflina, Passage ot ths, by Napoleon,
i. 478
Berlin, entry of Napoleon, L S32 ; fight
between the French and Oossacks,
486 ; BTacuation by the French,
486 ; revolutionary movement of
March, 1846, iii. 18; conflict be-
tween the people and troops, 21 ;
the King ndce through the streets
in the character of Gonnan leader,
23 ; opening of PrUHBian National
Parliament, 33; riots against tha
Assembly {Sept 1848), IIS, 120;
Conference of 1849, 139 ; opening
of the first Parliament of the
GBrman Empire, March, 1871, 468 :
Congress ot (1878), 618
Berlin Memorandom, The, rejected by
England, iU. 481
Bernadotto, Crown Prince of Sweden ■
allianco with Riiwiu, i. 4G3 ; enters
the War of Liboiiition, ill
Bemadotte, Pronoh genOTul, com-
mands Qie army ia Hanover, i.
KODBBir SVBOFS.
SM; vtoMM n«MUa territaiT,
BeniEtorfl, Cbnnt, Pnusian eavoj at
the ConferenM of London (tS64),
. iu.851
Barryj Uorder of Duke of, iL 1GB
Bertiiier, Qeneral, leads Freiu^ troops
into Rome,!. 164
BeaikK Bay, iiL 194; despatch of
Engliih fleet to, 481, 607
Tlmiiiiiiliiii 1 gained by Kuama in 1SI4,
ii.4
B«nidrM, Marahsl (French), defeat*
the Bpauiah at Rio Seco, i. 383
Beari^rea, Spanish inaoTgent, ii. 319
BeuBt, Coont, iii. 152 ; Saxon minia-
ter at the Conference of Londoa
S.B4), 361 ; Austrian MInigter, 301 ;
aettlsmant with Hungry, it. ;
■D^;«ata the union of Luxcmbnrg
with Belgium, 401 ; arrangog de-
fennve alliaiice with Tlaly, 410;
diamiaaed from office at the initi-
Ration ot Biamarcit, 478
Biarritz, meeting of Napoleon in. and
UiHmarck, iii. 36S
Bilbao, ii, 433 ; beai^ed by the Cwf-
li^, 4311
Bimnarck, Prince, auccceils Prince
Hoheiiloha as Prime Miuister, iii.
313; [jroviouB nppointiuonta and
□uiiuirchical tendeucies, 313—315;
jKilicy of " Blood and Iron," 317 ;
reaolvea to levy toiM without a
Budget, 318; monsures neainst the
I'resa, 321 ; establishes fnendl; le-
Mione with Euaaia, 329 ; hostility
towuids Poland, 342 ; attitude
towiirds Denmark on the death of
Frederick YI[., 313; statecraft
roaistting Schleswig-Holstein, 346,
349, 355— 3!it!; names conditions on
which Sdilcswig-Uolitcin should
be given to the Prince of
AuguKlenbtirg. 357 ; meets Napo-
leon 111. at Biarriti, 369; soeka
oo-tiporution of IL'ily in war against
Austria, 364 ; preposos to summon a
GorniHn FarlmraLnt, 30B ; reply to
Knpoleon III. on his demand for
the cession ot the Rhsuish I'ro-
vrnocB, BGB ; orders troops to enter
IloJstoin on Auatria^s refusing to
attend Ihe propi>i«)d BuropcinCon-
grusa, 370 : liis ilcniands refund by
Oerouui SCntoa, ii.; bis life at-
tempted, 371; hjB domasdafor the
aoquiaildon of territorr aftar tte
warwith Austria, 878, 376 ; TiewB
on the project of Napoleon 1 1 1, for
the acquisition of BelgiTim, SSt;
popularity aftet the Battle rf
KoniggrUi, S86; treatment of
Napoleon's proposal for the Deasion
of LniembuTg to Franoe, 401 ;
triumph of his fibt^flmanship io the
strength end success of the Gennan
army, 432 ; mocle Napokon IIL at
Sedan, 446; meats M. Julea l<'an«
at Fitrricres ri^peeting negOlJatione
for peace, 460; lequiree the surren-
der of StrasbnTg and Tout, ii. ;
meets Thiers atyeraaiUeatoanange
terms of pouco, 464 ; requim the
Oesaion of Alsace and BoBtorn Lor-
raine, and payment of six milliards
franca as the basis of psrtoe, t). ,■
hostility towards the Crown Prince,
466; policy in favouring a Repub-
lic for France, 475 ; a-'oumnces to
Russia and Austria, 47-'i, 476; policy
at the Congress of BerUn, 618
Blakn, Bpanish ^naral, i. 394
ULiDc, Louis, ii. 610; member of
French Provincial Qovemmenc
(1640), iii. 31 ; excluded from Na-
tional Aasembly, SB
Bliicher, (ieneral ; capitulate* at
Liibock, i. 831 ; Icada Pnisaian
army Bsiiinat Napoloon, 491 ; hoail*
division of Hus^ns and IVus-
siaoa, 602, 606, 612, 614; attacks
Napoleon in France. 622 ; head of
Prussian troops (1615), ii. 49; de-
!, 79
Bohemia, national movements (1830—
1813), ii. 488, 487 ; the Csoohs'
movement for indepandeni.'e, iii. 13;
declines to send repTceentatives to
National Assrmblyat Frankfort, 31;
rebellion at Prague, 53, 54 ; Pnia-
sian-Austrion campai^, 376
Bolugtia ; portion of CisjuuL-me Re-
public, i. 133; insurroction of 1831,
ii. 399
Bonaparte^ Jerome; compelled to
mairy the daughter of the King ot
'Wiirtemherg, by his brother Napo-
leon, i. 803; Kingdom of West-
phalia given to him, 347; flight
from Westphalia, 517
Bonaparte, Joseph ; French, ambnssa-
d^ at Rome^ i 163; rnrnwiwU
) Einff ol . .
flight fnmi Uadrid, SEM; Mcond
%ht, 449; defnted at Tittorim hj
Walliagton, fi!0
B<mapBjt«, Looii ; made King of
HolUnd, L 803; abdicatioD and
flight, 138
Boudparte, Lucien,i. 202, 203
Bonaparta, NapoleOD [Stt Napoleon}
Sooicsuiipagiu, ftnrdipian envoy, iu>
261
Bc^eaux ; takes arma ag&iiuit Paria, i.
Tl ; French Natioital Aaaembly
opened at (I87I), iii. 468
Boi«dmo, Battle of, i. 468
Boania, takes arms against Torkey,
iiL 23B ; handed over to Austria at
the Congresa ol Beriin (18T7) &i9
BoaphOTUt, The ; role for pnssage of
war-ahipa agreed upon by the
Powara, iL 462
Boult^line, Amy ot, L 284
BooTMki, Qenend, oommands Frenoh
army of the £ai^ and is defeated b^
the Qennana at Montb^liard, iii.
461, 463
Bourdonnaye, Xa ; member of French
House of Bejmaentatives, ii. 101,
103 ; ntioiater uider Charlea X,
361
Bourmont, Qeneial ; French minister,
iL 361 ; campaign against Arabs,
366 ; capture* Algien, 367
Bragania, House of, i. 366
Brandenburg, meeting of Fnusitul
Parliament at, iii. 124
Brandtmbuig, Count ; Prussian minia-
tar[1848), iii. 123; death, 146
Braiil ; seat of Portuguese government,
ii. 186
Brionia, Omer ; Turkish oommander,
ii. 2S5, SOT, 339
BiisBon, French general; (urrenders
to the Tyrolese, i. 413
Biiisot, M., ioumklist and Qirondin
mamber of LegialatiTe Assembly, i.
8 ; uigee war against Austria, 10
Brune, Marshal ; murdered by French
Boyaliats at Matseilles, ii. 93
Briinu, i. 286
Bmnswiok, Duka of; hif hatred to-
wards Emigranta, i. 33 ; inradea
Fnuic6, 42; Us proclamation to
the French, 43; retreat at Valmy,
48 ; retires befon the French at
WBrth, 87; on PruMianpolicy, 299 ;
fii
Brmuwick (Tounger) Dnke ^ inTadei
Saxony, i. 423
Brunswick, Insurrection in, ii. 407
Buenoe Ayrea ; falls into the haadi of
the Ei^lieh, L S69
Bulgaria, ii. 260; TurkiBh tmMueree,
iii. 483 ; autonomy constituted by
the Treaty of Ban Htefano, GIO;
piuviajona of Trent; ot Berlin
relating to, 618
Billow, Pruisisn seneral, L 608 -
Bunsen, Count, iii. 132; letter from
King of Prussia ou Bnglaod't
aaaiatance to Turkey, 202, note;
PrussiaD ambaseador at London,
203; conflict with King Frederick
William, and lesigoation ot mSce,
204; letter from Frederick William
on the Emperor Nicholas, 220, note
Buol, Count; Austrian minister, iiL
201, 249
Buidett, bir Fimicii, iL 166
Burgimie, English enginear in the
Crimea, iii. 212; letter to the
Tinuri, 213, note
Burke. Edmund, i 63; hia description
of the state of France, 76 ; asaoiua-
tion with Beaconsfield, iii. 487, note
Buirnrd, Sir Henry; unnmands
British troops in Portugal, L 386
Byron, Lord, iL 212, 286, 313;
writing* excluded from Auttia,
Okdii, inreatment by tiie Fi-enoh, L
453 ; conspiracy in Spanish army ;
iL 172; meeting of Cortes, 321;
besiegud by the French, 222
Oadoudal, Georgea, his plot to mus»-
inate Bonaparte^ L 274
Cagliari, iiL 284
Oajazzo, iii. 296
Calabria, Duke of, Vioan^ «f Ha^es,
ii. 184, 200 ; linng against Aoatrian
rule, 474
Calatoflmi, iiL 286
Calder, Sir Kobert, English admiral,
L28«
mderaii, Neapolitan Society oL iL
181
Ouabaofr^ Second Coniul of Fibdml
L 210
Cambmy, invested by Austrian^ i. 78
Cambridge, Duka o^ his flight from
Hanover, i. 271
Camperdown, Battle of, L 161
Oampo Fonnio^ Treaty of, L W
182
MODERN EtmOPS.
^, Georgv, Hr., i. 3(3 ; dster-
minei to aeizc Danish n&vy, 350;
on the proponJs of tho Aiz-IS'
Oiftpalls Conference, iL 131 ; op-
posed to joint interrention vitb
AJlies, 190 ; irillidiawB from oBice,
ISl ; BQCoeeda Castlenagh aa
Foreign Secretary, 21'i ; detenninee
to npliold the indapendenre o( the
Bpanish colonies, 227 ; sends troops
to Portugitl, 231 ; stateBmanship,
383 ; attitude towards Oreef-e, 312 ;
Hsttemich's hostility towards him
(or umngin^ tha AD|;lo-l{iisiiian
Srotocol tor intervention in Greece,
23 ; death and policv, 32S— 32S
(hDning, Sir Stmtford ISm Laid Strat-
ford de Badcliffe)
Oannibert, French commander in the
Crimea, iii. 313, 224; Buccaedad
by PSliBier, 225
Chpe of Good Hope, i. 237
Ckpodiitrias, Foreign Minister of
Bii*aia,ii. 196; his rule in Oorfn,
264 ; bre for the Greek oauae, 287 ;
xetirea from ofSce, 2SS; eleel«d
President of Greece, 345; policy
and administiatloD, 350—361 ;
Oapua, i. 1 74 ; Barrendered to the
French, 176, iii. 292: Burrendered
to SaniiDisn troops, '2U7
CbboDori, Neopolitan Bccret society,
ii. ISO, 190
Oirdigan, Lord, iii. SIS
Oarignano, Prince of. ii. 204, iii. 270 ;
and Met Charles Albert
Chrinthia, annexed to Napoleon's em-
plr«, i, 430
Oarliiit*, or Apostolicals, ii. 230, 232 ;
rebellions, 427 : Tictories under
leadership of Zumnlucnrret^i, 434
Carlos, Don, brotherof King Ferdinand
of Spain, hciad of clerical party, ii.
176, 177 ; claims the crown of tipatn
on the death of Ferdinand, 429;
nnites with Don Miguel, i*.; de-
{eatad and conducted to London,
430 1 reappears in Spain at head
of insurgijiiUu 431 ; victories, 436 ;
■urrcndi^ of troops to GenoraJ
Espartoro, and end of war, 441
Ou-lowitE, Conqjess of Serbs (1848),
iii. OS; patriarch of, 89
Otrlsbad, conference of ministers {1819}
ii. M2, 14A
Cbmot, M., administiator of French
anny.i. 76 ; his polii^y, SO ; mciubor
of Directory, 103 ; uppoaos the rale
ttOio Directory, 144; flies tor bja
life, 14S ; his wotk of organiialHB,
178; protests against &>napHit^
■ssnmption of the title of Empernr,
276 ; urges assembly to pronda for
defence of I'aria after battle of
Waterkw, ii. 66; exilaand death,
103
CbrTBScoea, Neapolitan geneirBl, iL 183
Qutbagena, rising against the French,
i. 880
Cases, taicen by Egyptians, ii. 303
CbssoI, losurrection in, iL 407 ; coo-
quered by Pnisaia. iii. 874
OisUereagh, Lord, i. 34 3 , 523 ; represent*
Engt^md at the Congress of Vienna,
ii. 20, 24, 2S ; declines to sign th*
Treoty of Holy Alliance, 66 ; pro-
poses council of ambassadors for
the abolitioa of the slavo-tiade, 76 ;
foreign policy in Sicily, Spain, and
Franco, 87^90 ; on the proposala
of the Aii-la-Chapella Conference,
132; Conservati Ts policy, 1S4 ; op-
poses tha Crar'g proposaJ for joint
intervention, 190; death and ciuk-
nicter, 212
Catherine of Russia, her hatred to tha
French Revolution, i. 13; deeign
on PoUnd, 33, 67 ; gives Western
Poland to Prussia, 83 ; death, 168
Catholic Emancipation Act, i. HO
CauUincoart, French envoy at tha
Congress of Prague, 1. 600 ; at the
Congress of ChittiUon, 623
Cavaignao, General, lends troops
against insnrgonts in Paris (June,
IS48) iii. 40 ; rise and decline of hia
SDWar, 43 : caQdidul« for the Proai-
9ncy of the Kepublic, 47 ; arrested
by Louis NapKileon, 172
Oavour, Count, iii. 223 ; Prime Minister
of Piedmontese Government, 244{
character and plans, 246, 246 1
Crinionn policy, 247 ; meets Napo-
leon in. at PJombiires to negotiate
respectiog war with Austria, 2.53;
summons Garibaldi to support him
in a, war with Austria, 264 ; vaxiou
intrigues on behalf of Kalian in-
dependence, 25i) ; accepts British
proposal for disarmament, 268 ; dia-
pleasure at the terms of the Peace
of VillafrHnoa, and resiguation,
206 ; bis plans for the union of
Italy, 268, 269 i returns to power,
276 ; agrees to the cession of Nice
and Savoy to France, 277 ; policy
with regard to Najdca, 239 : orilrn
Admiral Persanotoeicite iosorreo-
tion at Naples, 290 ; itru^le wift
G*nbaldi,SM; viewareftudiiiRth«
tianafer of Venice to Ituliuo King-
dom, 300 ; kttitudfl townrda tha
CathoUo Church, 301; luat worda
■nd death, 302 ; character and i^niat
work on Uihall of Itnly, 3(12-^0-1
Ceylon, retuincd by Enitland by the
Tniity of AlDii'HB, i. TiS
Chalcidice, disttict in Gm'co, li. 28S
Chambord, Comto da (Due de Bor-
dsHux), gmnd.iun of Ch:u'les X., ii.
376, iii. leb.tH, 475
Chftmp de Mai, iL 4S
Championoet, Franch general, 1. 17^
173, 178
OhangHmier, oommuider of Uw
National Guard in FUris, iii. 161,
aircBted by Louii Napoleon, 171
ChanBenetH, Marquis de, governor of
the Tuilerius, ii. 17
Quinzy, Ueneiul, leads the French
army of the Loire again at the
PruuianaBtVenddmoandLoJIanj,
iiL 461
Charlea Albert, Eing of Sardinia,
defeats Anstriana at Qoito, iii. S6 ;
defeated at Santa Lacia, ii. ; enten
Milan, but retreata on tbe advance
of Auatiiana, 61 ; dtfeiited at
Norara and abdicate^ 100
ChaileB, Archduke, entnutcd with the
defence (d Austria sgainat the
French,!. 127; defeats Fi-ench at
Amberg, 128 ; defeats the French
St Stoi^Dich, 1 79 ; withdriiws from
Rnnian allied troops, 102 ; hand of
Anotrian military adminiatration,
282 ; replaced by General Mack,
ii.; proclamation to the German
nation, 409 i Bavarian campaign,.
416 ; anny defeated by Napoleon at
Abonaberg, 416; defet' ' — """
French
eated by the
Charles III., hia rule in Naples and
Sicily, i. 116
CharlM IV. (Spain), L S67; seeks
Napoleon's mterrention, 371 ; abdi-
cai«e, 374
Cbarlfis X., king of France, iL 321;
his goTemment [1824-1827), 358-
360 ; diHolTCB the Cfaamb^s, 360 ;
makes Vicomte de Martignao chief
ninistart it. ; conflict vith mdnirten,
364 ; Ordinances of July, 368 ;
sbdicfttta and retires to England,
376, 377 ; death at Goritz, 377
Charles, Prince, of HahenzallaTii<
Si^marinnn, elected Hereditaij
rnncA of Itoamania, iiL 237 ; oom-
■■ttdi at Plema, iii. SOt
BX 633
Oharlottenbnrg, Convention of, i- 334
Chateanbiiaud, M., member of French
ChamlwT of Deputies ii. 06;
appointed Foreign Minister, 217
Chatham, Earl of, commander at
eiipudilii>n against Antwerp, i. 428
Chatillon, CongrsBB of, i. 623, 626
L'luuvolin, French ambaasador, expelled
from England, i, 68
China, iL 24S; maasaciv by Tnrk^
Christian VIII., Ttinff of Deomark, iiL
27
ChriAion IX., aucceeds Fraderick VII.
aa King ol Denmark, ii. 346 ; cedes
his dauns in Schleawig-ilulstein to
Austria and Frusaia, 363
Chriatian, Prince (of Gliieksburg),
dt*ulared heir to the throne of
Sohleawig-Holstcin, iiL ISO (AW
Christian IS.)
Chraauovski, commander of Sardinian
army against Austria, iii. 99
Centra, Conventiun af, i. 3S5
Circles of the Holy Itonuui Empire, L
Cisalpine Republic, L 14S; its dissolu-
tion, 18!
Cispodane Hopublic in Italy, Creation
of the, i. 133
Ciudad, capture of. by the Duke of
Wellington, i. 448
Civil Code of Bnnaparte, L 268, 643;
abolished in Westpbalia, ii. 8
OiTitaVecchia,Tlie French at, iii. 106;
occupation by the Frraioh renewed,
408
CSarendon, Lord, represents Great
Britain at the Oooferenoe of Paris
(18S6), iii 230
Clarke, M., French Minister of War,
iL 103. 104
Clerfay^ Austritui oommandar, L 94,
97
Clergy (Greek), ii. 243
Clergy (Romish) ; opposed to decrees
of National Ajsembly, L 7 ; their
Cjr in Austria, 20; position in
esiastical States, 37 ; incite to
inaurrcctioa in Naples, 177; re-
coaciliatioa with Bimaparte, 260 ;
popularity in the Tyrol, 411 ; im-
prisonment of, by Napoleon, in
Papal Slates, 437 ; fanaticism in
Bpain, and oppositJon to the Cortea,
464 ; nstored to power in Spain, iL
1 1 ; encroachments in France, 1 8 ;
benefited in France under Eicheliau's
OoMtitation, 207;
584
MODBSir XUaOPB.
qipotntod to Bt«t« oKom In Spun,
S23 ; rioe of powai ia Fninoe under
OhulM X., ses 1 dedina of in-
flneoce in Fmuce under LouU
Fhilippe, !S1 ; ratormution pro-
posed in lUl/, ill. Growth of
power in AuitHa, iii. ISG
dotJlilo, PrinMiis, iii. S63 ; Liitrothod
to ^noe Jerome Napoleoii, 26e
Clabt, French, in 1791, L 8 ; Itepub-
lican dub at MainLi, 62
CntUtion (1798) between EngLind,
BuBsia, Tuikoy, nud Naples a^iinrt
the French Jicpubhc,i. 169 ; between
England and Itusaia against France,
378
Oobdon, Ricbard, Mr., tii. ITS
Cobenil, Ludwifc, Austrian plenipo-
iGDtiary in lUly, i. 147; at the
CoiiKTeM of ItaHtadt, 150; Prime
MiniBler, 283
Coblenta, hoad-quorten of Emigmnti^
i. 7
Coburg, Prince; invcifltE Cambray and
Le QiiuBnoy, i. 78; dcfoiitud by
Freueh at Fleuru*, 62 ; rejilaeed by
Clorfayt, 9*
Oodringtou, Admiral; attacki Ibn-
bim's forces, ii. 330
Colberg, Oullant defence of, ugninst
the French, i. 342
OoUin, Austrian general, occupies free
city of Cnicuw, u. 492
CoIot,'ne; condition in 1792, i. 37;
cnptured by French, S4 ; wealth
of the Elector, 264
CommiesioutTS of the Convention
(F™m-o).i. 73
Committee of Public Safety (Fmnc«), 1.
71
Commune of Paris, The (1793); op.
position to the GironJina, i. 6(i ;
cruiihoB Wirunilins, 71 ; (1S7I)
tempts miiJo to overthrow the
t of National DcCen
e the c
r> of
the Niitional Guard, iii. 469:
CJenemla l^^iomte and Clenivnt
Thomas seized and put to deaths
a ttioluliooary committee formed
at the MOtel de ViUo; eU'clioiw
held fur the coimcil; huslilities
with IhottDopa of Versiiilles, 470;
alaughtor of prisouers and hoiil'i^i;B,
and destruction of public building!
on the entry of ue Oovernmcut
troopn into Paria, 471
Conooidjt ol ifouaparte, i. 260—205
Cond^ Biege o^ i. TO; suirenders to
; II , 335 ;
Oondoroet, phScMipher, «ad Qinmdia
member of Legulativa AMembly, L
9 ; his mauifeiito, 14
Oongreeg of Vienna, iL 20—31, 3S;
TOBUimition and completion after
■acondTruaty of Paria, 67—77.
Conscription; in Fianoe, i. 76; in
Prussia, 483 ; in Hungary, iii. 96
Constant, Benjamin, draws np
Napoleon's Acta Additionnal, ii. 43
CoiiatiintinB,GiaadDuke,ii.318, 319;
withdraws Husaian troops from
Poland, 393
Coiiatantine, Qrand Duke (younger),
appointed Vitetoy at Warsaw, iiL
334 ; attempt m bis life M War-
saw, 335
Conntuntinople ; ezecntion of Patriarch
and massacre of anJibishops and
Christiana, ii. 275, 276 ;
of Christians by Ma'
Conference (1878), ii
Convention, French, proclaims the
Itopublic, i 49 ; rocaives addrease*
from English Radical societiea, A9;
invaded by mob, 7 1 : ohange of
coustitution, 101 ; atlackoJ by
Boyalisls, and defended by Bon&'
parte, 102
Copenhagen, Battle of, i. 231 ; bom-
bardment by the English, 361
Corfu, ii. 264
Coriutb, Isthmus of, ii. 298
Coreica, i. GO
Cortes, Sjiauiah, i. 450; declarot Itas
Bovereigiity of the people, and tho
freedom of the Press, 453; opposi-
tion of ilie ct'Tfry, 454 ; declines to
restore the Inquisition, tt./ leaden
amii-bjil by the king, ii. 16S;
aammonod (1820), 17ti; rotirta to
Ouliz on the invasion of the
French, 221 ; banishment of mem-
bers, 223 ; frequunt succession ot
new, 439 ; agreea to modification
of CODStitutiun of 1812. 440
Cotunna, Unlttu of, i. 398; declares
for a Constitution, ii. ITS
Council of Ancionti (Franca), i. 202
Council of Five Hundiod (France), i.
203
Council of S(:ilo (F.ance), i. 204
Cowloy, Lord, British ambassador at
I'aris, uttciuipts to mudiatu bctwuen
Austria, Fianc^ and Sardinia, iii.
2GT
OracDw, ii. 30 ; oocupiad by Anstriana,
1 Wiir, twiran In poaitiTa t«-
■ulta, iii. 181 ; ParliumenttiTy papers
fta, TeapectiDg, note, 183 ; com-
nanoement of, 199; Battle of the
Alma,Sll; boialnTdTDoatof Sobai-
topol, aad Battle of BuIbcIbt*, 214 ;
Bnttle of Inkonaunii, 216; loss of
EnglliBh troops from severe wiiitar,
218; Buttle of the Tchcmayfi, 226 ;
capture o( the Ualahofi by the
French, ih. ; fall of Sebnstnpol, ii.
Croatin, Movement in (1818), iii. 63— 69
Crown Prince of PraBsia oppOHts Bis-
BWck's meaiurea against the Press,
S21 ; takes part in the campaign
•gaioht Aiutria (18S6), 374— 376 ;
oommaniia sauthem army agaiiut
the Freni^h (li70), 433; dsteaU
the French at .Weissenburg, 434 ;
dete&ta McHahon at Worth, 434 ;
«t the BatUe of Sedan, 446 i at the
•iege of Paris, 460 ; nnfriendly rft-
lationa with Bismarck, 4SS
Onstine, Oeneral, enteia Mninz, i. 61 ;
defeated in the Palutinate, 69 ;
commandf anny of the North, 76 ;
executed by BevolutioDaryTribunal,
79
Ooitoua, Battle o^ between Anstrians
and Sardinians, iii. 61 ; second
battle of, between Amtrians and
Italians, 377
Cnzhaven ; blockade by tlie French, L
271
CiuB, Frinoe Alexander, elected Hos-
podar of MoldsTia uid Wallarhio,
lU. 237 ; expelled by his subjects,
U.
Qrpnis, asngned to England by Tur-
key, iii., 617
Chartoryaki, Polish noble, Fresidsiit of
Provisifnlal Government in Poland,
iL8»3
OiechB, The, ot Bohemia, iiL 13 ; their
rising at Prague, 68; hostility to
Hungry, 76, S87, 391
Cheklen^ Tlie, of TraniyWania, iii. 86
DBh]manii,n^iorta on the armistice of
MalmS, iii. US ; retires from
National AaMmbly,- 137
Dalmatia, taken by France^ i 14B;
inu t^ Anstna, ii. 4
Danton, sends the mob aguust Qm
Tmbriee, i. 41 ; permits the Sept-
amber maasacre, 46, IS ; loader of
the Moontain party, 67 ; attacks
Girondins, 67
Dantxig, Snnender «4 to Ou Blench,
iUS
Danobc^ Hapoleon'i pMsage ef Qie, L
420 ; second passage, iH ; Roaaiaa
passage of the (1878), iii. 197
Danufaian Pro vincea entered by Basmon
tniope, iii. 191 ; emcuation by
Russia, 203 ; Austrian protection,
ii.; rights and priviluges guaran-
teed by the Powers at the Confer-
enoe of Paris (1366), 232; iucor-
poration with Austria proposed by
Napoleon III., 236 ; Prince Alex-
ander Ciua elected Hoapodar of
Moldavia and WalbLchia, and after*
vacdi expelled, 2;i7 ; CharlsB ot
Eobeniollem elected Hereditary
Prince of Houmania, ii.
Dardanollea, The, ii. 148; Bntry of
French and English Beets (1889],
151 ; rule for passage of war-shipa
agrcisd npon by the Powen, 462 ;
entry of Biitiah and Fnindi fleela^
iii. ise
DaTidoviob, Austrian ^noral, i. 131
Davoust, General (French), defeats
Pruaaians at Auoratadt, i. 829;
enters Berlin, 332 ; headi the army
in Bavaria, 108
Drik, Hnngarian statesman, ii. 490;
leader ^ HuuKariau Assembly,
promotee reoanmliaticm with Aus-
tria, iii. 388, 3S9
Dobreczin, Hungarian Parliament
meets thtm, iii. 87
Decases, M., French miniate
iL 06, 07; sangiiiaory i
respecting tlie rising at Grenoble,
IIS; influence over Louis XVUL,
116; his measures, 161; victory
over ultra-Borelists, 1S6; com-
promise with Boyolists, 168; dis-
missal, 160
Declanttion, of Leopold II. and Frede-
rick William II. reepeotdng the
safety of Louis XVI., i. 4, 6; of
Duke of BcDnswick to Fit^tx, 13 ;
of Frenuh Convention to aU. na-
tion^ 61
De Qallo, Austrian envoy to Bonaparte,
Lu:
Deleesort, M., Voreiga Uiniiter of
Louis m., L 12,
DemMnaki, appointed ij Koosoth to
the oommand of Bongarian army
in the war against Anstria, m. 87,
90, S6
Denmark; joins the Northern Uari-
time Leagoe, i. 238; Battle ot
Copeohagen, 231 ; landing of.
Englisb troope, 361 ; declare* war
, 18T5,
ue
MODEBN EUROPB.
HorwBj', fi. B ; relidlion (rf
SohlMwig-Holstaia, iii. 26 ; death
of King: Christian VIII., and ac-
oanion of Ftedemk VII., 27 ; war
with Fmaaia respecting Sohleawig-
Holatoia, 28 ; arinistica of MitlinS
with PrtuuA, 1 1 T ; peace with
Pnuaia, U9 ; death of Fradorick
Vn^ 342 ; aooesdun of Chria-
tian TIL, 347 ; conflict with
FtomU and Austria reapotling
tiohleiwiK-Uolstem, 343~35:i; by
Treaty of Vienna King CTii-istian
oedos hia rights in Sililmwig-Kol'
stein to Pruasia anJ Austriii, 353.
DennewiU, Battle ol, i. SOS.
Depretia ; PK>-DictAtQr at Pnlermo,
iii. 2SS; reugne office, 294.
Derby, Lord, English Fortign Secre-
tuy (187S], proposes a oonfcronoe
at Conatantiaople, iii. 190 ; nidigna-
tion and resumption of office, 607 :
differencea with Lord Be&consGi>ld
on the EastovQ Question, itnd re-
BLgnation of office, 614.
Dinvolo, Fra, i. 177.
Diobitsch,. commander of Boaaiaii
forces, ii. 340 ; defeats Turks at
Kulewtscha, 341; crosses the Bal-
kans, 342; invades Poland, 396.
Diet of the Empire, i. 17, 164, 218-
264
Diet of Frankfort, ii. 6S : passes re-
prt'Bsivo measures, 115-160 ; fur-
ther nprussion, 410; enters upon
reform, iii. 4, 20 ; extinct from
1848 to IB&D, 113; restored by
Auatria, 146; decrees federal exe-
'a Uolstein, 346; Prussian
withdraws, 370.
Dijon, in. 4eL
Directory, The Franch, i. 101, 103;
iiutructions to Uonapnrtc regarding
campaign in Italy, 121 ; nugntiatcs
with Prussia and Austria, 120 ;
declines propoaaU of pence with
England, 131 ; party of opposition
in the, 144 ; intimidated by liona-
part«, 144 ; members seized by
Aiigereau'a troops, 118; roorgan-
ia'itioQ,it. .- consents to Bonapaiie's
attHck on E^-jit, 1 63 ; unpopularity
in 1799, lOS ; its overthrow (1799),
203
Disraali, Hr. B. IStt Lord Beacons-
fiold)
Divorcv, abolition of, in France, ii.
Dobmdsdia, TIm ; i
207;
1876, 199; ceded to Russia and
givnx by Hussia to Euumaiua ia
exchange for Bossarabia, 6 L2
Domingo, St., ceded by Spain to French
Republic, i. 96
Donniidicu, French geoeial at Qre&-
oble, ii. 116
DSmberg, Qeneral, lerolts against
King Jerome of Westphalia, i. 417
Douay, General, leads Jrrench troops
at Woissenburg,andi«defeatedBad
killed, iii. 434
D'Oubril ; Russian rmroy to Paris, L
316
Dranmli ; Turkish oommandsr, u. 295,
297, 298, 299
Dresden; entry of Napoleon, i. 494;
battle of, 606 ; democratic liaiAg,
iii. 136 ; occupied by Frussiani,
374
Ducoa, M., French Director, L 201
DumOurieK, Oonersl, Frendi Uinister
of Foreign Affiiirs, i. 2; checks
Prussians at Valmy, 47 ; proposes
peace to King of Prussia, 47; in-
vades theXetherLinds, 52; def^nted
hy Austrians at Neerwindem, 68;
his tnason, 69
Duniiis, Mr., retires from office with
Pitt. L 240
Dunkirk ; bsaeged by English, L 78 ;
Duke of York defaulcd, 79
Dupont, French geneial, enleni Spain,
i. 372; defpFited at Baylen, 384;
Minislfirof VVnr (L8U),ii. 16
Duiando, Papal general, iiL 66, 60
EcoleeiaBtical Slates ((lerman), i. 37;
secuIanKitioQ of, 129; snpprcssioa
of, l.";:, 262
Bodesiastical System (Frnnoe), re-
oiganiaed by Natiomu Assembly, L
EdeLsberg, BatUe of, i. 416
Egypt; Bonaparte's dtdgn of ftttark
on, i. 1S2 ; failure of French ei-
pedition under Banapoitcs lr>7 ;
Bonaparte's vicl«rv at AboiikJr,
200; French ,BDd Turkish pu^'^Lze-
menta, 234 ; capitulation ol Cutro
to Snglish, 23S; cspitiihilion i^
Alexandria to Eogliah, it. ,- con~
Jjuest of Crete, iL 303 ; navy da-
eH.t«d at Navartno. 330^—332 ; war
with Turkey (1832), 443—148;
B»ond war wife Turkey (183»J.
463
Kt«,LE»
Blgln, laordi hk report ooncondng
FisDch emigmata, i. iS, note ; on
the Battle of Jamappea, 64, DOts;
on Pruiwia'a deaigna, 77, note ; on
the Preocli ano}' in the yether-
lands, 90, note ; report on the Ta>
Tidiitioiuiy feeling in Fiance, 131,
Elliot, Sir H., Bntish emlinraador mt
ConatanUnople, iil. 182, 192
Emigrant Nobles (France! ; take arms
sgniast Fiances i- 7 i head-quncten
at Coljlenti, 7; protei:tod by Elector
of Ti^TM, 10; tiioir diaparaal de-
manded by the Gironde, 10 ; alliod
with Au^ria and Pnueia a^nst
France, *2; thcLr cruoltica, 45,
note ; landed bj English fleet in
Brittany, 100; their defout by
General Hoohe, 100; return to
France, 103, ii. 13; restored to
official tank, 16; granted com-
pensation o{ £40,000,000, 359
Bnu, iiL 41d ; telegcam respecting
pretended insult to the Frencli
Ambassador, bj King William
of Pruswa, 420
Enghien, Murder of the Diibe of, i. &7S
England ; alarmed by Decree uf French
ConveDtion, i. 66 ; feeling towards
£Yench Eevolution, 56; French
amboarador expelled, 68; war with
France, 69; condition in 1793, 69;
sympathy of Fox with Frenrh ReTo-
lotion, Gl ; Btrugglo ef Oeorffe III.
with Whigs, 8i ; attitude of Pitt to-
wards French Revolution, ea ; Burke
denountes the Revolutionary move-
ment, 63; victories on French
trontier, 76 ; driven from Dunkirk,
79; commands Mediterranf^an after
the siei:e of Toulon, 82 ; contrast of
English and Austrino policy, note,
86; fumiehea a subaidy to Fruseia,
88; retiree from Uolland, 05; at-
tempts to negotiate peace with
France, 130 ; Battles of St. Vin-
cent and Camperdown, 161;
Battle of the Nile, 16a ; coali-
tion with Rusaia, Turkey and
Naplea against France, IBS; com-
bined eipeditioQ with Russia against
Holland, 196—197 ; replyto Bona-
parte'a proposal for peace, ai6; new
pnmoaalaiejected, 223 ; differences
wid Boaaia, 228 ; war with North-
em Mnritine Powers, 230 ; Battle
nf Oijienhagen, 231; peace with
Northern Powu^ 233; attack* the
Fronch in Egypt, 336 ; Battle of
E. SS7
Alexandria, 23S; takea Gairo
and Alexandria, 236; Treaty of
Amiens with Fnnoe, 238 ; Act of
Union with Ireland passed, 240;
National Debt in 1801, 241 ; war
with Franca (1803), 266 ; occupa-
tion of Hanover by the French,
270; joins Russia in coalition
against France, 278; Battle of
Trafalgar, 290 ; attacks the French
in Italy, 302 ; death of Htt, 309 ;
coalition ministry of Fox and
GIrenville, 310 ; ships excluded
from Prnsaiao ports, 314; seimue
of Prussian Teaaels, ii, ; Napoleon's
Berlin decree against English com-
merce, 336; fall of the OrenTille
ministry and ap])ointment of the
Duke of Forthind Prime Minister,
313 ; Treaty ot Bartenstein, 344 ;
troops land in Dcmuark, 361 ;
bombardment ot Copenhagen, ii. ;
Denmark declares war, 353; troops
enter Portugal, 386 ; victory over
theFrencb at Vimieiro, 38ri ; Spanish
campaign (1809), 395—308 ; defeats
tha French at Tala vera, 426; failure
ot expedition against Antweip,
428; Spanish Caoipaigns (1810-12),
443-449; (1B13), 619; Dulje ot
Wellington enters Franco, 620.
At the Congress of Vienna, iL 28 ;
at Battle ot Quati-e Bras, 51 ;
Battle of "Waterloo, 63 — 66 ;
part taken in drawing up second
Treaty of Paris, 69 — 62 ; de-
clinea the Czar's Treaty ot
Holy Alliance, 64 ; socks at the
Congreas of Vienna to secure aboli-
tion ol the Slave Trade, 74-76;
foreign policy nnder Wellington
and CaatioreaRh, 86-90; discontent
from 1816 lo 1819, 121 ; Canning's
opinion on the proposals of the Aix-
la-ChapdleConference,131:rcftisea
to enter into a general leuijiia with
the Allies and France, 133; Con-
aervative policy of LordCiistlereaRh,
164; protection of Portugal, 186;
provents joint diplomatic action
with regard to Spain, 190; with-
drawal of Canning, 191; proteals
against the Troppaa circuLir,
197; neutral attitude (owardi
Bpaiush revolution of 1822, 210 ;
death ot Chatlereagh, and appoint-
ment of Canning as Foreign Secre-
tary, 212; Congress of Verona,
215-217; piohlbite Uie coiiiqueBt of
Spanish adoniea, 2^6; wiula troopa
MOT>sss mmops.
to Portcigal, SSI ; Chnniar's rtatcs-
muiBhii), iZS ; protocol with liuAda,
321 ; dW«ata Turks at Nsvariao,
SSO-332 ; iiutotiOD in Eastern policy
after tbe Battle of Navarino. 3»3 ;
Protocol of LondoD raapi^tiug Qreek
frontier.aiB; Talleymnil.&a Frencli
kmbaMulor to Loadon, perauadea
William IV. and WeUington to
abstainfiomintervrntioDin Uulgian
kOain^ 386 ; CoDference of Luodun
ncogiiiMa the iudeptoidenDe of
Belgium, 386: pnexinf; of the
Baform Bill (IS32),il9, 420; groir-
ing ftiendlineBa towanla Fiance,
^2^i•, aqundron sent to Foiiumtl to
demand indomnity tor attack on
Britiih Bubjacta, i'iH; assiata Spaiu
with aima and atorea in queliing-
Chriiat rebellion, 433 ; fleet Mat to
tha DardanoUus, 451 ; Bettlement of
X^atem Question, 1841, 461; fleet
sent toNiiples on the ou^upation of
Feirai* by AuBtria, i73- Ktata of,
in 1851,iii.l7E); n'pudiatcatchcmes
aagnceatod hy Emperor Nicbolaa
ieij|ii!i:ting disintegratioD of tha
Bultnn'B doiiiinioDB, IBT: poli<7of
Lord Abinleoii and coalitiun minia-
try {18.r3), IS'J— 194; despatch of
Beot to Bi^ika Bay on the eotir of
Eiinian ti-oupe into Dannbian Fio-
TiDueH. I'J4; declaration of war in
conjuni^tiun with France against
KussiFi, 19B ; damandH on RuBsia ua
the basis of peace, 209 ; trooja land
in the Cnmoa, 210; BatUe of the
Alma, 2 11 ; Bat tie of BaUcUva and
loaa of troops in the Crimea during;
the winter of 18o4, 218: mis-
maiia)(Crii<»it of the canipsip:n, 219;
Lord Abeiilcen'« miniBtiy rcKigna^
and Lord Pulinoretun is made Prima
MiciBtec,219;UunfL'i\.*Qco of Vienna
(May, 1SS5), fails toaraange treaty
of peoca between En^lund and
Bnaaia, 222 ; resumption of the
siege of Sebnstopol, 223; full of
Bobastopol, 226 ; treuty of peace
with HuBHia eignod at Paris
(1868], 230; agi.cmont made at
Conference of I'uris willi re-
grird to the righta of nentrala,
232 ; insists on dinaion of
DsnTihian Principalities, 328 ; at-
tempts to mediate bttwuen Austria,
France, and Sardinia, 266; Tolun-
lecv bnaa^ 379; ^jupathf wilb
Italian revolntion, 298 ; <
of London reapeuting Denmail and
Bchloswig-Holriain, 351 : radll*-
tionoQtheSchle8wig-HolBt<.'inqusB-
tion, 3fi3 ; rejects the Berlin Hsm-
oraodum, and dispatches the flo^
to Bcsika Bay, 481 ; opinion on
Butgariau masHacree, 4S3 ; Disraeli'a
Foreign Policy, 484-4S7 ; the Con.
alantinople Cuntisrenoe, 493-495 ;
t}ia"LondoQ Protocol," 496; fleet
ordered to Constantinople, and re-
rersal of order, 607 ; Loid Derby'a
leaignatioa ajnd resumption of oSicc,
607; Vote of Credit of £6,000,000
for army purposed, ih.f fleet ordert'd
to Constantinople, 608 ; imminence
of war with Kusna, COS ; objectiona
to the Treat); of San Btelnno sum-
mod np in a cdrcnlar to the Powera,
614 ; secret agreement with Busnia,
617; acquisition of Cyl^na, it.;
CoDgreea of Berlin, 618
English Commonwealth, L 60
Epirus, ii. 354
Effort; head-qoarien of Pruanan
army (1806), i. 326; meeting of
Napoleon and the Emperor AIoi-
aniler, 390 ; meetinK-placeof Pcdui uI
Psrliamcnt (1849), liL 141
Erioroom, iii. 505
lOski Sagra, iii. 499
Espartero, General, totally defeats th«
Carliata (1839) ii. 441; appointed
Regent of Spam, H. ; exiled, 442
^Uenne, 6t., Revolt of working-clasaca
at, ii. 416
365
Eugenie, EmprasB, eftgemea fi^ war
with Prussia, iii. 420; insists on
McMahon marchins; to the relief of
Weti, 443 ; flight Horn Paris after
the anrrender of Napoleon at
Sedan, 448 ; declines tho Pnusiaa
conditianB of peace, 456
Eupaloria, Hay of, iii. 210
Evans, Colonel Be Incy ; leads English
and French Toluntcers against the
Carlista, ii. 438
Exhibition, Qreat, of 1851, in. I7B
Bjlan, BatUo of, L 34!
Faidfaerbe, General, leads the nench
army of the North against the
Prussians, iii. 469
Failly, Oonenil, defeats GaribaUians
at Mcntaoa, iii. 408 ; snipiised at
Bwoacot^ iiL 444
dkip of Modena, S<
'uTre, Jnlea,
ofNapoloo .
a circiJar to the EuropciLn Courts
on tbe overthrow of tbu Niipoloonio
Emiiire, 448; meeta BiBmarck at
FerriSree to negotiate (or peace,
450 ; meets Bismarck at VersoiUea
to diacuBB torins olaniuicistics, 463
Ferdinand, Archduke, i. 28S
E^itliiuuid, Grown Prmce of Spain, i.
US; placed under aireHt for
s luj^ioaed. intrigue with Napoleon,
371 1 restored to the king's favour,
871 ; proclaimed king, 3T4 ; lured to
Bajorine, 375 ; ronouncoH the crown
at Spain, 37S ; restoratioa in 1614,
U. 9; arroHta the loiidora of the
Cortao, 166; wtiaUtjr to the
clergy, H, ; estaliliahuB the Coimtitu-
tioo, 177; conipires againet the
Constitutiun, 207 ; relirua to Suville
cm the invasion of the French, 2i9 ;
annuls the Constitution, 22'2 ; dtalh
(1833), 427
Ferdinand I., Emptmr of Austria,
■uoceeds Francil (1S3S), ii. 4S3;
yields to demands of itud^ats
and mob respecting the National
Onard, Jii. 61 ; flight from Vienna,
b2 ; djssolvea Uungarian Parlia-
ment, and declares i£ acts null and
Toid, 74; flight to Ohniiti, 77;
abdication, Bl
Fetdlnand, King of Naples,
with Bonuparte, i. 123; .
tion against the French,
«nton Home, 172; despatch
exiled Pope, 173; flees from luime,
173; eacapes to Falsnno in the
Vanfuard, 174 and (note) 175 ;
returns to Naples, 184 ; treaty with
Anatria, iL 8G ; ride in Siuiiy, i&. ;
declares a Constitution, 184 ; hypo-
crisy, 186, note ; goes to conference
at Laihach, 139
Ferdinand II,, King of Naples, pro.
claims a Constitution, ii. 474 ; con-
qaere Sicily, iiL 112; bin violence
and oppression. 1 1 3 ; death, 2B1
Feiraia, portion of Cispadane Uepublii^
i. 133
Flanden, lattlea between Aendi and
alliud armies of England sad
Austria, i. 91
Fleet, German, sold by auction, Ui. 161
Floury, Franch officer, con&dant of
Louis Napoleon, iii. 167
Florence [Sa Tuscany)
Fontaioehleau, Treaty of, i 3SS
Forbooh, iii 433
- y, Fi - - -
lapoloon, ii
Foretar, Mr. W. E., M.P., oppuaes the
Vole of Credit tor £6,000,000 for
army purposes, iii. fiOS
Fauch£, M., appointed to the head of
French Pro visional UoTemnient by
Louis XVIII., ii 60 ; faU of bU
ministry in 1815, B6
Fonrior, ]£,, his Socialiatio work, ii
609
Foi, Mr. C. X, M.P„ sympathy with
Freneh Kevolulion, i 61 ; takes
office with Lord Grenvillo, 310;
pauiQo nttituds towards Fiunce,
311; death, 343
France; war declared against Austria
(1792), i. 2; Louis XVL aocopts
Constitution of National Assembly
(1701), 5; National Assembly dis-
solved (1791), 6; Emigrants lake
anns ii^ioat, 7 ; war-policy of the
Girondo, 9 ; opening of war agninst
Austria, 41; invaded by Prusainn
troops, 4'J; waraguinst Allies miwa
j nst one,4 0; patriotism ,46; evacuated
by Prumia, 48; dctlareda Republic
by Convention, 411 ; the war be-
comes a crusade of domociacy, 49 ;
successes of army in Geimany, 62;
anoeioa Savoy and Nice. 64 ; execu-
tion of Louis XVL, 68; war with
England, 69; opposition between
GlrortdiDS and Mountain FaTtj,66—
68 ; tn»son of General Dumonrici,
69 ; loBDB former conijacsts, 69 ; out-
break of civil war, 70, 71 ; victory
of the Mountain over C)irondins,T 1 ;
Committee of Public Safety ap-
pointed, 71 ; Beign of Tenor, 78—
75 ; conscription, 76 ; Social Equali-
ty, 80 ; defeats Austriaas at Wat-
tignies, 81 ■ victories at W5rth and
Woissanbuig, 87 : lakes Antwerp,
93; conquers Holland, 05; treaty
ef peace with ProMia at Basle, 96 ;
condition in 1795, 99 ; Constitutian
of 179S, 101 ; the Directory, Cham- '
ber, and Council of Ancitiits, 101 ;
opening of campaign in Italv, 118;
vtotoiiea of BoiMfftrte inlta^, 119,
ifODSsjf armors.
120; invadeB Gennany, 12S ; d»-
laats AuHtria at Areola and liivoli,
134, 135; negotinliona with Aiu-
tria at Leobmk, 138; tlectiuus of
1797, 143;MunraolDir>-cton, nnd
reoi^ni»tion of Directory, IIH;
treaty with Austria kt Campo For-
■nio, 147; mteiveDlion in tiwitser-
land, 169 ; intri^es in Itomc^
163 ; oocujiiea Rome, 104 ; eicpudi-
tioo to Kgypt, 166 ; drfoatod
\n Eti^Iand at tiie Battle of the
Nita, IGS; I'ualitionof 1798 against,
ISB; evBuuatas Ilome, 17^; re-
enton Boine, 173: taltoB Naples,
176; defeated by Austria at Btoc-
kndi and MiifiTiano, 179, 131 ; de-
faitud bv Kus^iia on the Trebhia,
Wl; deteatod nt Novi, 191; vic-
tories over English and Russians in
IliJIand, 195, 196; condition in
1799, 198—200; Bonaparte's return
from lC)tvpt. 201 ; new Constitution
of 17'J^,'203— 208; the Consulnte
of Uonaparte, 211 — 214; raiuoip-
tion of var af^inst Austria, 217;
Pence of Loncville, 226; friendly
with ItuBsia, 227; defeats Turks
at llclionolis, 234 ; defeslfii by
English in Egrpt, 235; 1'reatT
of Amiens with EnglHnd, 238;
Fr^ich mle in Ilaly and Switzer-
land, 244—246; Civil Code and
Concocdiit, 25H— 266 ; prowlh of
Papal imwor, 263 ; war with Eng.
land (1803), 266; Bonaparte as-
sumes the title of EmpiTor, 270 ;
coalition of Rnsna, England, and
AuBtria, 278; defeatu Austriane
atUlra,2S8; occupation of Vienna,
293; Aueterlitz, 296; Peace of
Preabnrg, 299 ; InBuBnce in Ger-
many and Ituly, 307 ; war against
Prussia, 1806, 326 — 336 ; acquisition
of Prassian territory, 347 , war
against Portugal, 366 ; troops enter
Spain, 3T2; war reopened by
Austria, 402 ; surrender of Qentr^
Brisson's column to the Tyroleee,
413; Napoleon enters Vienna, 416;
defeated by Austrinns at Aspam,
421; defeats Austrians at WagTam,
426 ; French defeated at lUavara
\j Sir Arthur WeUeoley, 426;
MBoe with Anstria, 430 ; Napo-
bon's annexations of the Papal
States, Holland, fto., 436—438;
troops enlsr Portugal, 446 ; in-
TaAonotBnna,4SS — (7T;PniBEta
4«oUtm war, 4U) opeiunf dC
, Groasbeeien, Kulm, LmpD^,
60o — 613; invasion by Prusoa
and Allies. 619 ; dethronement of
Napoleon, 631 ; Peace of Paris, 638 ;
results of Napoleon's wars, 640—
644 ; restoration of liOnis XVIII,
631—633. Character of Lonia
XVIII., ii. 12, 13; new Constita.
tion, 14; at theCoDgrenotVicona,
22—31 ; Napoleon leaves Elba, 31 ;
Napoleon ^ters Paris, 38 ; Biftht
of King Loois, ii. ; th$ Acts Ad-
ditionneI(lSI6j,42; thaChamberfl
Buinmoned, 44 ; election, 46 ; new
Constitution, 46 ; Battles of Ligny,
Quatre Bras, and Waterloo, 60—
66 ; Napoleon'* flight to Paris, 66 ;
Napoleon's abdicatiini, 66; Alli«a
ent<>r Parii^ 67 ; reslomtion of
Louis XVIIL, 67 ; remoral of
Napoleon to St. Helena, 68;
cessions and indemnity by tlia
second Treaty of Paris, 62, 63;
International Council of AinbaB>
sadors meets in Paris for tha
regulation of French sSairs, 79;
Ituyalist oubages at Marseilles,
Nismes, and Avignon, 91—93 ;
p:icctiansof 1816,93,94 : raactionarf
Chaniber of Deputies, 96 ; eiecuti(«
of Msrshal Ney, 93; Richelieu's
Amnesty Bill, 101 ; persecution of
suapectod Bonaoartdsts, 103, 104,
and note; the nltra-Eoyalist pBiiy
adopts Parliamentary theory in
Chamber of Depaties, 105; e(MJeai-
sstical si&ameH, 106 ; abolition of
divorce, 107, Electoral Bill, lOS;
Vill^le's counttT-projeot of popular
franchise, 110, 111 ; contest in tha
Chambera on the Budget, 113; the
Chambeis prorogued, 1 14 ; tiaingkt
Grenoble, 116 ; disBointion of the
Chamber of Depnties, 117 ; pasainB|
of Electoral Law, 117; partid
evacuation by AJHed troops, 119 ;
general improvement from 1B16 to
1818, 119, 120; evacoation by
Allied troops, 131 ; Oontercmce m
Aii-la-ChapellB, 131—133; condi-
tion after IBIS, 164; nuasiirss of
Decazes, 1 65 ; resignatitm of Mche-
lien, 163 ; reaction against Lihoal-
ism aft«r the murder of the Duke
of BeiT7, IM; second letiremmt
of Richeliea, ii. ,' protects of Count
of Artois, 160; YilUle's MinistfT,
l«lj tf "
mMoMJon at flie Conf^nM of
Varoiia, 216—217; invmiion of
Spain (1823], 219; iytnp&thy with
Greece, 324 ; joins in a treaty with
England and Russia f oi Buppressing
the conflict in the East, ii. ; defeats
Turku at Navarino, 330—332 ; Qo-
Temment of Chaile* X. (1824—
1S2T), 3G8— -360 ; Ministries of
Uartigiiao and Polignoc, 360, 361 ;
Sorogation of Chambers, and
aneral Election, 36S — 368 ; cmn-
psign against the Arabs, 36<^;
captoco of Algiers W 0«nenJ
Bourmont, 367 ; publication, of
Oidinance* in the Monitew, 368;
Eevolution of July. 1830, 371— 37G;
abdication of Charles X^ Lotiia
Philippe made King, 378 ; nature
of the Revolution of 1830, UTS ;
attitude towunis insurrection in
Papal States, 401 ; imnureutiunB in
Paris, Lyons, Grenoble, and other
places, against the Government,
416, 416; attempt on the llfo of
Ijouib Philippe by Fifi«hi, 417;
law* of 1835 to repress seJition,
417 ; growth of friendliniiBS to-
wards Englaad, 422; declines to
■end troop.1 to Spain to quell Garll^t
rebellion, 437 ; suppoit given to
Viceroy of Egypt, 450, 456; fleet
sent to Na[ilaa on the occupation of
Ferram bj- Austria, 473; nuu-rlsge
of the Duke of Montpeniiier to the
infanta of Spain, 606; demnnd for
Parliainentarr reform, 607 ; oppo-
aitiou in the Chanibers to Louis
Phillpjie, 608; spread of Socialiam,
609; lievolutlon of February, 1848,
6U; abdicationand flight of Louis
Philippo,613; Republic proilitimcd,
U. ; effect <rf the Kavolutlon on
Europe, iii. 3; meeting of I'ro-
Tisional (Jovonlraent, 34 ; national
workshops, 36 : first actx ofNutioual
Assembly, 38 ; not of May 16th,
184S, Ui. ; the Assembly seeks to
•bulieh national workshops, 38 ;
order for enlistment of workiricn,
40; insurrection o( June, ib. ; rise
of Louis NspoleoD, 43— 4G ; Louis
Napoleon efeoted President, 47;
troops dispatched to occupy itonie
and restore the Papiil power, 106 ;
atlcuipted inmri-eotions (184y), 108 ;
sioHe f>d capture of Itomn, 108,
109 ; rOBtorcs Pontifical Govern-
ment, lOS; aims of Louis Nupo-
Imd, ISIj law oanied for limit'
ing Cm frtmohise^ ISO ; Louis
Napoleon seeks for prolongation
of his Presidincy, 162 ; revision
of Constitution for prolongiog
Napoleon's PresidBnoy reieoted
by Assembly, 166 ; Louis Napo-
leon's preparations for the Ciwy
d'JUJ, 167 1 Assembly refuses Lonia
Napoleon's demands for re-estab-
lishing univerHal suSrage^ 170;
Qjup d'itot of Dec 2, 1861, 172—
174; massacre in Paris, 176; the
plibiteitt entrusts Louis Napoleon
with farming a COnstitntion, and
niaintHins him in office 177;
Louis Napoleon proclaimed Napo-
leon IIL, Emperor (Dec. 2, 1862),
177 ; dispute with Russia respecting
Holy Places in Palestine, 185 ; aeet
dispatched to Besika Bay on the
entry of Russian troops into Dan~
ubian provinces, 184 ; declaration
of war against Russia, 199; troops
land in the Crimea, 210; Battle i^
the Alma, 211; Battle of Jnker-
mann,217; attack on the UalakoS,
223 ; Emperor Napoleon proposes
to direct operations at the sloge of
Seliaxtopol, 224 ; dufeats Russia at
the Battle of the Tchemayu, 226 ;
Treiity of Peace with Russia
signed at Paris (1856), 230 ; troops
occupy Syria (1860), 238 ; declares
war, in conjunction with Sardinia,
againitt Austria 269 ; defaits
AustrianSHt Mngenta,261 ; victory
of Sotferinu, 2b3; peace with
Austria concluded at Villafrsni;*,
265; Napoloou pkns the esUblish-
ment of an Italian kingdom, 273 ;
dismissal of Walewaki, foreign
minister, and ajipuintment of
Thouvenet, 274; annexution ot
Saroy and Nice, 277; uuilHissiidor
withdraws from Turin on tli" Sar-
dinian invnsiun of the Papal ijtat<4,
293 ; September Convention with
Italy, 301; obt-.ina Venotia for
Italy, 377 ; NapoI..^m III. mediates
between Prussia and Austria, ib, ;
Napoleon ei.<ekB for the cession of
Luxemburg, 401 ; outcry against
Prussian aggression, 403 ; re-
occupuliou of Civita Vecchia, 408;
isolation in 1S70, 410 ; indignation
sgiiirist Prussia at the candidature
of PHnne LeopoU fnr the Spsnish
throne, 413; war ducidod ag.iinst
Prussia (1870), 420: only nxteen
out of eighty -seven deportments in
XODS^f SUROPS.
ttfoai of mr with Pnisna, 421 ;
OonditiaD of tiie vray, 428 ; incom-
Gtenc« And lethargy oC ministen
wu propaistioiu, 420 i doSciou-
oiM of the mnaj ngeraTsted by tha
minppnmTutico of paUio fondi^
430; deloatAd by Fmadana at
Woiiieeubutg, 4S4 ; defe&t«dat the
BalUe ofwerth, 435; dsfeated at
Spiuheran, Mata-la-Tour, and
Orairelotte, 438—441 ; Battla of
Sedan and Hunender of Napoleon,
446; dopodtion of ths Emporoi
and prodanutjon of tha Gepublio,
447, 448; fonnutioa of a gorem-
ment of national defence, 448;
Qambetta andertukes the formation
of national armiee, 460 ; liega of
Farig, 460; fall of Struburg, 453 ;
army of the Loire, 463; Urleani
taken by Germans, ii, ; capitula-
tion of Meti, 466 ; capitulation of
Faria and araiiatice, 403 ; oloctiona
ordered to bs held, 4S3 ; National
Auembly meeCt at Bordeaux, 464 ;
Thien anangea terms of peace
with Biemarok, ii.; entry of
Germans into Paris lut March,
1871, 466; TreatieB of Versailles
and Frankfort with Germany, ii. ;
iusuirectiou of the Oomoiuno and
national Kuard in Faris, 468^471 ;
tha Bepublic under M. Thien, 474 ;
UcMahoa't presidency, 476 ; Comb)
de Chambord, it. ; at the Congress
of Berlin, 61S
Francis II., Austria under, i. 27 ; his
address to the Gorm~ma body, 164 ;
assumes the title of Emperor ot all
his dominions, 277; inotpadty, 406.
On the Holy Alliance, ii. 64 ;
his intolerani:e and resistance to
progreea, 82 ; death (1836), 482.
Francis II., King of Nnplea ; suctuicda
hia father, Ferdinand II., iii 281 ;
altBmpts t« negotiate an ellianue
wilh Piedmont, 2B9 ; flight from
Naples on the advance of Unrilialdi,
2U1 ; conducted by tha French, on
the fall of Goela, to I'apal &t&t<:s,
288
Francis Joseph I. , Emperor of Austria
{184R), iii. 81 ; diuolves Parliament,
S2; demands from Turkey the eur-
rendor ot Kossuth, 184 ; commands
his armr in Italy a^tnst France
and Sardinin. 2fl3 : interview with
Napoleon 1 II. at ViHifmuca, 266 ;
promises to Tcetore the old Con-
niiuUop (o HungMjt, 324 ; oonfUot
irith Hnngarfan AsKmbltei^ SSt;
exdoded &om Germany, 376 — 379;
reoontnliatian with Hoogiiy, 38B ;
crowned KJag- of Hungary, 393";
private arrangGmontB wi&i Na-
poleon HI. for defanoe ■yi"^
40S
Frankfort, liaing at, ii. 411
Frankfort, Gtorman National AHemUr
of, iii. 31 ; debates on FrimaiT
Sights, 114— 116; outrages on the
ratification of the armistice of
Malmo, 118; discuBsea Qorman
relations with Anstiia, 126 ; pane*
ths Conatitutiiat, 130 ; elects
Frederick William IV^ Emperor,
130; German governments reject
the Constitution, 134; end of tha
Parliament, 136
Frederick Charles, Prince, commands
Prussian troops inSchleswig a^inat
Denmark, iii. 360 ; takes ^art in tha
campaign against Aostria, 3T4 —
376; ooramandsthe central Fmaaian
army against the French, 133 ; be-
sie^Meti, 441,447
Frederick the Great, work in Praasia
of, i. 30, 37
Frederick YII,, King of Denmark ;
accession to Uie throne, iii. 27 ;pnb-
liahes draft of a Conititntion, U. ,■
war with Pruesia respecting SvhleA-
wig-BoUtein, 28; death in 1S63,
342, 346
Frederick William XL (Prussia), meet*
Emporor Leopold at Pillniti, and
issuna joint declaration relating to
safc^ of Louia XVI., i. 4 ; chuae-
ter of his rule, 32; his alliance with
Austria sgninst tho Frentdi, 33 ;
treaty with Cathorine of Bnsna,
83 ; breach with Aostria, 88 ; laada
army npon Warsaw, 89
Fredeiick William UI. (Pnisaia) ; hia
proposals residing HanoTef, i.
270 ; his remonstrance with Bona-
parte, 272 ; temporinng policy with
Bonaparte, 280; treaty with the
Emperor of Russia at Potsdam, 292 ;
evades engagements wi Lh Bnsaia, 297;
attempts to disguise the oession of
Hanover, 312; at the Battle of
Anerstiidt, 329 ; flight to Weimar,
330; dismisses Stem, 336; cordial
relations with Emperor of Russia,
344 ; cedes large portions of terri-
tory to Napoleon, 347 ; reluctanoo
to enter info war with Austria, 407;
proclamation to the German nation,
409 ; proposal of alliasce with It UMi%
■s^nat' Kanoe declined, 4S8 ; do-
cIai«B waraf^aiiut France, 46S; Can-
glMS orVIenoa.ii. 24, 36 ; ireakneBB
and timidity, 83 ; proiidBea a popu-
lar Constituti on, 121; interfomin
tha diBcnniaa caosed by SchinaJE's
pamphlet, 12& ; recommHinIations
giren to him by Mettcmich, 137 ;
flitahlUheB the Provincial EsbLtos,
ISl : attitada towards Greece, 323 i
death in ISJO, 496
n«d0nclf Williata IV., of Priuaia,
ncceedg hia fiithor in 1840, ii. 497 ;
biidianicter, 198; convoke* united
Diet at Itcrlin, ii. ,- violent language
to tha duputicB. fiOO ; manifesto to
the Oonnan people during tha dis-
torlancoB of Maruh, 1848, iii. 33 ;
withdraws to Potaiiam during Hots
at Borlin, 120: prorognei and
afterwards diNSoIves the Pru&^ion
Awembly, 123, 124; elected Hm-
Siror ol Gormany by the Frankfort
arliamont. 130 ; refnaea the
Imperial crown, 133 ; attempts to
form A union of German atotea,
IS9: total fuilure of attempt to
fonn a German Federal Union,
1S4 ; proposes that the riiihts of
the Christian anbjocts of the Sidtan
thould be goaranteed bv thu Qrctit
Powers, 202 ; letter to Bunm n on
England's anaiatance to Turliuy, H.,
note ; lettur to Bunson on the
EmporDrNioholna, 220, note ; with-
draws from pablio nSaiis, 806
Priedland, Battle of, i. 345
FrdBchwiller, iii. 43S
FrOBSoid, Gtmeial, leada French corpt
against Saarbriickon, iii. 433
Fnentes d'Onoro, BatUo of, L 447
Oaetb ; flight of Pins IX to, iii. 9S ;
bombardment and surrender to Sar>
dinian troops, 299
Gagem, Von; President of the Gor-
man National Aiiaenibly (1848), iii,
1I&; Ricceeds Schmerling as chief
minister in Frankfort Parliament,
136; pmposea a conditional union
with Austria, 127 ; leads the
Liberals in the Federal Purliument
at Erfurt, 141
Oai, lUyrian leader, iii. 63
Qalida; insurrection of Poles {184S),
a 493
OaUi)«)U;tii.2D7, S09
Gamlftta, IL, proclaims the Frenuh
RopuUic after the Barrender of
]7ftp(deoo It Sedftn, ilL US ; Isavee
Paria during the siege to nndertake
the govemnient ol the provinoea
and the orpianisation of national
armies, 4fil ; resigns on tha reiee- -
tioQ of his proposal for sicIuiIjdk
from election all perwns connected
with the Govemuient of Napoleon
ni., 464
Qarilnldi, General: heads a corps in
defence of Bome against the French,
iii. 106; leaves Komo and escapes
from Austrians to America, 109;
loads volnnteeiB against Austria
(1B6B), 257,260; proposes to Ind
an expedition against Rome, 270 ;
hostility b> the cession of Nice to
France, 278; breach with Count
Oavoar, 279; expedition to Sicily,
283; captures Palermo, and aa-
sumes tho dictatorsliip, 286, 286;
defeats the Henpolilans at Uj-
lazzo, 288 ; lack of administrative
faculty, 238 ; triumphant entry
into Naples, 292 ; requests Victi^
Emmanuel to consent to his march
on Rome, and to dismias Cavour,
295 ; dcfoHta NeapoLtan troopc
at OnJRzzo, 296 ; moating with Vic-
tor Emmonu^ 297; reduces
Oapna, ii. ; his request for the
lieutonancy of Southern Italy de-
clined by Victor Emmanuel, H, ;
made prisoner hy the troops of
Victor Emmanuel at Aspromonte,
S61 ; his troops invade PajAl Slates
(1867), 408; commands a body of
anxiliaries during tha Franco-
Prussian war, 4B1
Gaatoin, Convention of, iii. 3&S, 370
Qegenl»ch, Abbot of, I. 18
Genoa; overthrow of oligarchic govern-
ment, and establishment of demo>
era tie constitution favourable to
France, i. 142 ; blockaded by Ana-
triuna, 217; surrendered to Aua-
triona, 220 : given to the King of
Sardinia, 637, it. 70
OeorgaMs ; Greek insarirant, ii. 272
George III., Eiectorot Hanover, L8S;
abuses in England under his rule,
fi9; stru^le with political rarties,
ei ; hostility to the CathoHc Eman-
cipation Act, 240 ; announoes the
coalition with Russia against
Fmnce, 278; qTiarrels with his
ministeis on tho Catholic Disabili-
tiea question, 313
Oermany, state of, in 1792, i. 16-40;
whob at w«t of the Bhine in Uw
XODERN avsops.
haiuli ol the Fnoch (1794), 96 ;
kbukdonod bj Austria, 160; iti
rspraaentBtiiM at the Congreu of
Baatadt, 156 ; nfUtr the Ftww of
Tjtm^vilie, 226; W'tUement of, ^ij
Bonapurte 248 ; absence ol natiomil
eentimeiit, 260; Bonaparte's orgaai-
ntion of WeaUia, 303 ; no natioiial
unity (1806), 30* ; condition undtr
Nnpoleon's iiile, 307 ; Austrian war
□t 1809 agunst FntncB on t>ohalf
erf Qarmany, 403; Southsm Gor-
manT aidea with Napoleon, 4 06 ;
patnotiam in Northern Oermiiny,
ii. ; idea of unity at the outbroak of
war with Franco in 1813, 487;
Napoleon's campai^ of 1813,480;
Etein'B policy during the War of
Liboiation, GU8 ; beneficial effect of
Napoleon'! wan, 642. Act of
Federatioa at CoDgrsH of VionnA,
ii. 87 ; delay in promiMid Conrti-
tution, 126 ; alami raised by
SUtunlia'a pamphlet, 138 ; murder
of Eotiebue, 141 ; relation of Htnor
etatta to PnuBia, 113 ; meHSurca of
the Conference of Carlsbad, 146 ;
kctionary dexpotisin, 162; riao of
■ecret aooietiea, 163 ; eympalhy
with France, 163 ; condition after
French Berolution of 1830, 406 —
411;
I ZoUve:
roctions in Brunswick and Canjol,
407 : Constitutions giauted in
HuiOTerand SHiony, 408; despotic
reaction(lS32), 410— 412; Hsingat
Fiankfort, 411; repressive m«iauie«
of M«ttomich, 411, 412. AgitsUon
in Wcsl«m Germany, 1S47, iii. 3 ;
■ympHthy with Schleswig-Uolstein
in ila rebellion against Denmark,
26 ; deeire for onity amongst the
S'oplu, 29 ; formation of the Ant«-
nrliament, 29 ; mHeting of the
National Assembly at Franlcfort,
SI; work of (ha Aasemblv, 114;
outniges lit Frankfort on the ntifi-
cation of the armistice of MalmO,
118; the Frankfort Assombly dis-
euaaea the relation of Austrian
Empire to Germany, 126 ; Frederick
Winiun IV. refuses to accept the
Imperial Crown, 133 ; lYankfort
Aaaembly denounced as a revola-
tionary body, 136 ; end of the
Parliament, 1 S7 ; formation of
Federal Constitutiun and Federal
Fartiameht at Brfurt, 140, 141;
vvnBict in Uesao-C^iMl between
the miuiilrj and the people, I4t;
national fleet «oId by auction, 161 ;
epoch of reaction, Itl ; revival of
idea of Qerman union under the Ho-
gencyof down Prinos William. 307;
formation of National Society, 308 ;
Schlatwig-Holstein and Oerman
inteivsts, 348, 349 ; the Daniah war,
360 ; disHgrecmcnt between Austria
and Pmssia, 366 ; agreement of
Qastein, 358; war between Austna
and Prussia, 370-376 ; Treaty of
Prague, 378; Southern States onter
into allLince with the Kingof Prua-
■ia, 381 ; militanr orgtaninlion, 404 1
establishment of a Customs-Farlia.
ment, 411; progress of the work of
consijidation by Bismarck, 413;
mobilisation of troops, 427; Franco-
German War, 433-4B5 ; onion ol
N(nthern and Sonthcrn Slates,
and assumption of the title of
Emperor by King William, 466^
468 ; first Parliament of the German
Empire Opened at Berlin, 4S3;
" League of the Three EmpeTOr^"
476
Oervinna, monber of German National
Assembly, iii. 32
Qioberti, aims in hi* writings at ■
reformation of Italy thmugh tha
Papacy, ii. 471
Girondins, i. B ; their war-polioy, 9;
demand dispersal of Emigrants, 1 0
influence in the Conrentitm, 48
at variance with the Commune, 66 .
accusations against the Conunnna
and Robespierre, S6 ; batol by the
people, 66; influence dedinea, 67;
crushed by Commune and nembcn
arrested, 71
Gitschin, headqnartan of King of
PniMia in campaign against Aua-
trio, iii. 376
Giulay, General, u>mmandB the Ans-
tHana in 1859, iii. 360
Gneiscnau, Pmsaian eenciHl, gallant
defence of Colberg, i. 342; adrocatu
an invanonof France, 617; serve*
wttb Bliicher in Napoleon's last
cam)>aigD, ii. 62, 63
Godoy, Spaniak miniater, injoiioos in-
fluence, L 3S7 ; aeiMd by the mob.
uder
ii.84.
86, 88 ; •urrB____ _
Vila«o«, 86
GortchaXo^ IVince Alexander, r*-
(leaeat* Bmsia at tbe Oonfarenoo
«l Tiemu, lt>7, 18U, iii. 231 ;
■eelis to diun&de the Czar bum
making peace with. EdkIhiuI and
Allies, 230; rejects the inl: erf erence
of the Poven with regacd to Folish
•&in, 337 ; rosiats Milutine'i
measulu in Poland, 339; Bfirlia
Memorandum, 191 ; Servian cam-
paign, 489, 196, 609
Gourko, OananLl, leads Buasinn corps
;□ Bulgaria, iii. 4G9, GOO, 604, £05
Graluuii, General, oommiuid* English
troopi at Cadiz, i. 446
Qramunt, Duke of, French Foreign
Uiniiter {1S70), iii. 414 ; lavoura a
war wiUi Prnula, 41S
OnTelotta, Battle of, iii. 141
Greece, Bavolt in, ii. 167 ; races and
institutions, 237—242; Greek
Church, 243 ; the Armatoli and
Rlephta, 247 ; iHlanda nf. 243 ; the
Phanariots, 261; the Honpodiu*,
ii.; intellectual rcvintl in eighteenth
century, 263; Koraes, ^54— 267 ;
^wth of commerce, 260 ; founda-
taoD of OdeXHt, ii. ; inQiienc« of
French lievolutiun, 262 ; the songs
of Khegns, 263; the HvtieHa
Philike, 265, •26a; revolt of the
Horea, 273; extemuon of the
revolt, 285; massacre at Chios, 291 ;
doable invasion )>y Tiirke,
t of I
, 299; civil
; defeats in the Klurte,
W6— 310; faU ot the Arr.)]->liB of
Atbena, 311 ; intervention ot llreat
Britain and Biiasia, 322; Turks to
1m removed from the country, 322 ;
gpnpatliy amon^t the Liberals and
Ultramontanei of Pnince, 324 ;
the Bultan to retain puramount
■overeigntT, 32S ; condition after
Battle ot Navarino, 332 ; Cn|>oiIis-
biai elected President, 345 ; limits
of, settled by the lowers, 349;
Prince Leopold of Baie-Coburg
Mcepta the crown, 349 ; Prince
Leopold renounces the crown, 362 ;
Princ Otto ot Bavari;! made King,
S61 ; tranifoT ot Ionian iFlands
(1864) by Groat Britain, 355;
gain* Thessaly at the Congrosa of
Berlin, iii. 619
GMsoire (ex-bishop), election to
French Chamber of Deputies, ii.
IH ; election invalidatud, 168
Oi»goryXVI.(Pope),ii.3y9; appeals to
Anstria for aaoiatiuice agaioHt iusur-
geuto of Bologna. 100 ; refnses to
/ J
sx us
Bocept the proponis of ntom
reoommended by the Conference ot
Rome, 401 ; death (1816), 172
Grenoble, Napoleon's arrival at, after
escaping from Elba, ii. 31 ; popular
rising, 116; represeated byOregoire
in Chamber ot Deputies, 166;
revolt of working-clnMM (1831),
lie
Granville, Lord, and the dengna ot
Austria and Prusaia, i. 67 (note), 77
(note) ; on the royalist inovoraent in
Frani*, 98 (note) ; retires from
office, 240; Prime Minister, 311;
fall of his Ministry, 343
Qtot, Lord, and the English Befom
iiiii
i. 120
Giijsabecren, Battle of, i. 506
UuiKOt, H., Euocceds'I'hici's as French
Pranier, ii. 160 ; approveip of the
marriage of the Duke of Moatpon'
Bier to the Infanta of Spain, 605 ;
resignation (1B48), 612
Oustaviu! in. (Sweitcn), his hatred to
French Revolution, i. 13
Gymnastic eatabliahmentf^ Biipposod
by Hettemich to be dangerous («
EuTopeaiL peace, ii. 137
Habeas Corpus Act, Suspension of, in
England, ii 166
Ham, pluce of Louis Napoleon's im-
prisonment, iii. 44
Hainbach, Castle of, demonstration
a<,rainst German deepotism held at.
HamUton, I^y, i. 169 (note); 18S
(note)
Hamilton, Sir W., despalch resprcting
General Mack, i. 1 7 1 (note) ; on the
BHcupe of the Boyal Family from
Naples, 176 (note)
Hanover, Nobles ot, i. 30; occnpntion
by the French, 269; offered to
IVusHia by llonftparte, 281 ; King
of I'miwiu'e dissimulation respect-
ing its coBsion, 812; offered to
England by Napoleon. 315; in.
Burroction, ii.408. Attempt to form a
union witli Prussia, iii. 139;BO<-edes
from leaeiua vith Prussia, 110:
. conquered by Prooiia, 374; annexed
by Prussia, 37a
riapsburgii, The, i. 17—33
Hurdenberg, Buon (Prussian mini*-
ter], i. 280; on Pniau'i acqwai-
UODSRN atTROPS.
tim of Hsnonr, SIS (note) ; dli-
miual bom offica, 3S7 ; recalled in
IBtO, *67; polior, 4GS; meeta
Stein at Breslau to arnuigs Tnnt;
at Ealisoh, 4S1. At the Congress
of Vienna, iL 23; his dsnumda
napecting aecond Tmatj of Paris,
SO, 01 ; his constitutJonal •yatem,
123; decline of liii inflnence, I3fi-~
148; death, IGl
HaiTOwbr, IiOTd, hi« despatch from
Berlin on the stmioii of PmsHian
engagements irith HiueU, S9S
(note)
Haaaoapnog, Chief Kfinistra' in Hesse-
OaaHl, iiL U4
Hastings, Cuptaia, commondi a Qreek
detnchment, ii. 329
Hkugwita, Prussian Miuistcr, i. B8—
89; reoommends the occupation of
HaJlOTer, '269 ; hia withdrawal, 280 ;
interview with Bonnpart« at
Brilnn, 295 ; arrongBa traity wlUi
Bonaparte at Scbim^runn, 298;
•igna a treaty forcing Pnusiii into
w&T with England, 313; reaigna
office, 336
Haydn, the musician, L 21, 404
Helena, St., ii. 58
Helvetic Republic, L 182
Herzegovina revolts against Turkey,
iii. 477 ; handed over to Austria at
the Congi'094 of Berlin. G19
Bcsse, roBtomCion of the Elector, ii. 8 ;
the Elector's eitortioiis, 126.
HaAsenpflag appointed Chief Minis-
tor, iu. 144 ; conSict between the
Ministry and the people, and
appeal to Diet of Frankfort, 14S ;
aettlcment of affairs mfDrrod to the
Diet of Frankfort, 148; renewed
struggle hetween the Elector and
the people, 308 ; conquered by
Fnissia, 374; annexed to FrusBia,
3TS
Eetffiriu Fhilike, The, ii. 265, 288
Hooho, French general, i. 87
Hofor, Tyrolcso loader, i. 435
Hohenlinden, Battle of, i. 225
Hohenlohe, Prince, Prussian geneisl,
L 82G; advice on the movements of
the army ag^iinst France, 32S;
deatructioD of hia army at Jena,
328 ; •arronders to Napoleon at
Prenilan, 331.
Hohenlahe, Prince, Prime Minister of
Prussia (1862), iiL 312; resigiia-
tion, 313
tion ctf Bn^and and Bnsala agniut
1B5 ; the Bitariaii Bepuhlic,
237 ; iia oonatitntion in 1801,
243 : the Crown given to Louia
Bonaparte, 302 ; abdication trf
the King, 438; annexed to the
French Empire, 4SS; natored to
the House of Omnge, 636. United
to Belgium at Congress of Vienna,
iL 70 ; i^ohibite the alave-tnde, 76 ;
conflict with Belgium, 388 ; refoaaa
to aocapt deuiaion of Confarenco at
London with regard to Betginn
frontier, 388 ; bombardment of
Antwerp. 389
Holst«in (jM Schleawig-HoUtoin)
Holy Allianoe, Treaty of, ii. 63—06
Holy Homan Empire, L 16, 160; iti
end, 300
Hood, Admiral, at the aiegs of Toulon,
i. 83
Homby, Admiral, ordered withEngliA
Beet to Besika Bay, iii. 507
Hortense, mother of Louis Napoleon,
iiL 48
Hoapodan, Greek, ii. 261 ; iii. 184 ;
Alexander Cuia elected Hospodar
of HoldaTia and Wallaiihia, 237
Hotel de Ville, ii. 370; mooting of
lAfayetts's Municipal Committee
(July, 1830), 375; Louis Philippe
addresses Uie mob from, 376.
Heeting'plaoa of Prorisional Qo-
verament {1848), iii. 34
Houchard, Guneml, attncka Qennana
at Dunkirk, i. 79; executed by
Itevolutionary Tribnaal, 79
Howe, Lord, Tictory over French off
Ushant, i. 90
Hrabowaky, Austrian general, attempt
to occupy Cartowitz, iii. 68
Hugo, Victor, arrested by Louia
Napoleon, iii. 170
Humboldt, Prussian Hiniatar, reaigna-
tion, ii. 147
Hungary, AuLocraCTof .Toseph II. in,
1.24; policy of Leopold U. ID, 25.
Affairs in 1825, ii. 477; the Mag-
yars and Slavs, 478; Koaauth ia
imprisoned for putiliahing teporta
of debatea, 470; general pn^resa
after 1830, 480; peaouit^ laws,
481 ; schemes of Cbnnt Bzlohenyi,
481; Kossuth's journal, 484; ni.
forma of the IHet of IS4S, •*. ;
power of the Magyars, 486 ; Slario
national movements, 436, 487;
Count Apponyi appointed Chief
Hiniater, 489. Eoaanth's address to
the Chamben on Auafanan dea{Mt-
tun, iH. A; inaa indepeadcnoe, 11;
levolt ol the Serb*, 63—99; war
with AuitTU, 84— 8S ; Aiutriuu
oatar Tmth, 86 ; Parlument with-
dnwB to Debrecrin, S7 ; drive* the
Anatriaiu ODt of tJie couctiy, S9,
M; decIaratioD of indepcadenc^
90 ; RiiMinii mtdrventiou on the
Kdfl «f Aoitria, 93; campaign
of 1S*9, 94 ; cspitulatiou of
yiU^DO, 94, SS ; coDBtitutianal
light* (ttiingniiihed, 9fl ; AuBtria'i
Tengeonce, 96, 96 ; diploma for
KBtoring the old OoDBtitution pnb-
liihed by Auetria, S24 ; reeista the
est&bluhiaent of a Central Council,
S2fi; meeting of Diet at Pesth,
Cmitral Council, 326; dissolution
of the Diet, and eotabliihtaent of
niUibu^ role, 327; settlement of
oonflict with Austria, mid coidda-
tion of Francis Joseph, 387—392
Hnssein Paoha leads Turkish troops
into Syria, IL 443 ; defeated by
EgTptiuna at Beilan, 444
Hydra, one of the JEgexa Islands, u.
2%T
Hypailantt, Prince Alexander, ii. 268
— 272 i dismissed from the Rossian
eenioB, 271; flight to Austria,
373
Ibrahim, commander- in- chief of Otto-
man forces, ii 302, 303; invades
the Morea, 306 — 308 ; at the siege
of MisBoloDghi, 3oy ; deraatateB the
Horoa in opposition to proposal for
krmittice by the allies, 328; be-
sieges Acrc^ 442 ; declared a rebel
by the Saltan, 443 ; conquers
Syria and Ana Minor, 113; churac-
t^ of his rule after the peace of
Eutaya, 4C1 ; expelled from Syria
by European allies, 460
Ibiaua, capitolatea to BiMdan atmr,
iL339
Ignatieft, Qeneral, Kueaian ambasaa-
H"
n Protocol, 496
Inkermaim, Battle of, iii. 217
Innslmick, sorrendei to the Tyroleee
by tbe Bavarians, i. 413. Place of
retreat ol Ferdinand L, Emperor
of Austria, iiL 53
J J 2
IX. M
loqtdntioB, The, io Spain, L 393 ; the
Cortes declines to restore it, 462.
Restored by Kinf; Ferdinand (1814),
ii. 9 : attacked in Spain, 177
loniun Islaada takpn by Fiance, i.4S.
Uade a Bepnhlio, li. 264 ; trans.
ferred by Great Britun to Greece,
sse
Ireland, lynion of Qreat Britain with,
i. 239
Isabella, Queen of Spain, placed on the
throne n843), ii. 442. Dethroned,
iii. 412,
latria, taken by France^ L 148
Italy: condition in 1796, L Ul— 116;
opening of French campaign, 118;
pillage by Bonaparte arter his
entry into Uilan, 121 ; the Oispa^
dane Republic created by Bona-
parto, 132; birth of the idea at
Italian independence, 133 ; Venice
given to Austria by Bonaparte,
ill ; Genoa recoivss a democratic
DOnstitntiOTl favourable to France,
142; the French at Borne snd
Naples (1798), 163-177; reaction
at Naples, 183 ; campaign of 1799,
191; campaign of 1800, Marengo,
218—222; Bonaparte made I're-
sident of the Italian Republic,
244 ; Bonaparto accepts the title of
King of Italy, 279 ; condition under
Napoleon's rule, 307. Austrian
policy (1816), ii. 83—86; Austrian
rule, 1815—1819, 121 ; revolu-
tion in Naples, 1B2 ; Austrians
invade Naples, 202 ; insurrection in
Piedmont, 203 ; insurrection and
Austrian intorvention in Papal
States, lS31,40I—40S;occ'apatioii of
Ancona by the French, 404 ; Anoona
handed over to the Pope by the
French (1838), 406; Austrian rule
hostile to reforms, 467 ; Maerini,
46S ; Gioberti's vritings, 471 ;
reformation of the Papacy pro-
posed, ii. ; election of Vins 15.,
472; political amnesty, it.; enthn-
sinam in Rome, ii. ; Austria occn-
pies Ferrara, 473; conflict with
Austrians in Milan^ i7b. Iniuireo
tion in Lombardy and Venice, iii.
16, 16, 17 ; general wtz agaiut
Austria, 17, 18 ; Custoata, i»>
capture of Milan, 61 ; revolutionary
period (August 1848— March 1S49),
96—113; Novaia, 100; French
intervention at Rome, lOS ; tail
of Venice, 113; Neapolitan des-
potism, US; TbtoT Enunaanel,
MovBiar mmopa.
2i3; gunpugn of 18G9, 2S9;
battle of IS^gmta, 2BI ; ovar-
throir oC Papal authoritj in tba
Bomagna, 261 ; BstUe of SolfenDO,
263; peace of YiUafrancH, 266;
trwliea of Zurich, 266 ; Garibaldi
SropMea to attack Kome, 2T0 ;
'apoleoalll. propOBei a CongTsu
at Parii to discua Italian quoetions,
271 ; Napoleon IIL consents to the
formation of an Italian Kingdom
uader ViotorEmmanual. 273 : pub-
lication of the pnmphlet " The
Pope and the Congress," 273 ;
union of Tuscany, Parma, Modcno,
and the Romagna with Piitdmont
under (he rule of Victor Emnunuol,
^76; cession of Nice and Savoj to
France, 279 ; Sicilyand Naplos con-
quered by Oitribaldi in the nHme of
Victor Emnuuiuel, 285,290; Pied-
monteae troopa enter Umbria and
the MiirchcB, imd capture Ancona,
203—291; all Italy, excepting
Kome and Tanioe, united under
Victor Emmannel (IS61), 29S; the
gr«at work of Cavour on behalf of
Italian liberty, and his hopos for
the Intun, 302^304; <jaribaldi
at AEpromonte, 861 ; September
ConTention, it. ; rehttions with
Pnusia nad AxBtria, 367; war of
IS66 ; CuBtozia, Venice ceded,
377 ; Battle of Mentann. between
UaribaldinnB and Papal force*, 408 ;
re-occupation of Ciiita Vecchia by
Fmnce, 408; projected alUanco
with Austria, 410; tttkee poasession
of Kome, 472; guarantees to the
Pope, it.
Jacolnn* {—t Girondina)
Janina, Biege of, ii. 286
JimiBsarles (Turkish), ii. 339
Jftrria, English admiral, defoata the
Bpaniah Sect at St. Vincent, i. 161
Jellacic, Qovomor of Croatia, iii. 66 ;
Bummoned to the Emperor of
Anstria at Innabmck, 68 : allowed
becomes the champion of Austrian
nnity, 69 ; appoinled by the Em-
peror commander of all the force*
ID Hon wy, 74
Jemappea, Battle of, i. 53
JtBB, Defeat of Praeeians by Napoleon
at, i. 328; freedom ot printing-,
ii. 127 ; atudents of, ii.
Jesnits, their inflneooe declinea in
Cennany, L 33
Jewi, prohilntion aJteoting tlmt ts
Austria, i. 2S3
John, Archduke, L 224; plan
TTToIeBeinBDTr«ction,413; me
with Croatia, iiL 68 ; appcnnted ad-
miniatmtor of theAoatrian Empire
116; refoseato snpprenOie Badeo
insnTTection, 13G
John VI., King of Portugal, iL SH;
death 229
Joseph II., KeforiDa of, L 33
Joubert, French general, i, 191, 199
Jourdan, French general,!. 81; defenia
Austriana at Wattigniea, Bl ; in-
vades Oermony, 1 26 ; defeated by
Jovollanos, member of Spaniah Janta,
L 450; policy in ISID, 462
Juarez, President of Mexican, Repnblic,
driven from power, iii. 398
Junot, French general, i. 364 ; invadea
Portugal, 366 ; defeated by BHtish
troopa at Vinuerio, 386
Junta, Spanish, i. 392; policy in 1809,
460:resignatioDinl810,462. Pni-
viaional in 1820, iL 177; appointed
at Oporto. 188
Jiut, St., commiaaioDar of the Fronch
Convention,!. S7
Kunardji, Treaty of ; iL 259, iiL 188
Eamenski, Russian general, L 840
Eanoria (Qreok captain), heroic ex-
ploit against the Turka, ii. 293
Ears, Capture of, by the Eussiana, iiL
237, 606
Eaunitx, Austrian MIn
retirement of , 28 ; his wo^, SS
Kehl, Fortress ot, i. 168
Eesanlik, iii. 499, 606
Ehosrev, Tnrkilih admiikl, takea
Psara, ii. 304
Kburshid, Ottoman commander, ii.
286, 396
Kiel, formation of Proviaioiuil Q«vem-
ment dnrinc inaurrectioD againat
Denmark, iii. 2S, 366
Klapka, Hangarian general, iiL 87
KlBboT, General, L 83, 234 ; asnsiiita-
tion, 334
Klephts, The, iL 347
Knights ot the Empire, i. SB, 3U
Knobcladtirff, General, PnuBOB Mk-
bfissador at Paris, L 834
Eoletti^ Qieek Minister, iL SOO
Xolukobonoa, Greek comnunder, iL
264, 289, 398, 300 ; imiiiiBonnLent,
301 ; niuitated, 306.
Eondunottea, President -d Greek
Cham ben, ii- 300, SOS.
Konieh, Buttle <A, between Ggjptiaaf
«nd Turks, ii. *4*.
Kdniggtitx, ELuttle o{, between Pruein
and Au^rU (1S66|, iii. 376.
Konif^berg, Flight of King f radeiick
WiUi&rn to, i. 33H ; entry ol the
French, 345 I Bnniiine wlmltted to,
17S ; Stein pnhliibee the Cuu'e
order for the uming of Bast
Fnuda, 481.
Konee, Oreek BcijJw, ii. 264— 26T ;
statement r'jspecting Qreek navy,
261
Eonoiloff, Raadan general in the
Crimea, iii. 212, 213
EonakoS, Husdiui general, i. 189,
192, 193
Eownusko, leads Polish revolt, [. 89 ;
distrasta Napoleon's profesBiani,3^9
Konnth, Hungarian deputy, circu-
lates reports of debetee in defiance
o( Austrian Emperor, ii. 479 ; edits
a Liberal journat at Petth, 133;
his pHtriotic oratory, 489. Hie ad-
dress to the Hungarian Cihamben
on Auittian deepoLiBin, iii. 6 ; beads
demoomtio movement at Posth,
10 i h<atilit;r to Austria, 71 ; ordois
march against Austriana during
revolt of Vienna, 78 ; appoiuted
governor of Hungary, 91 ; flight
mto Turitey, 184; protected by
the Sultan af{WDBt the demands of
Austria and Sussia for his surren-
der, a. ; refuiM to acknowled^ the
•overeignty ol Flancia Joseph in
Hangnry, 392
Kotsebne, Hurder of, ii. 140
Krasnoi, Battle of, i. 474
Eiay, AuKtrlnn general, I. 191, 218 ;
Kremsicr, Fai-liament ol Vienna meets
IT, Bosaiui genera] in Bulgaria,
itL 500, fiOl
Enlm, BatOe of, i. SOS
Edstrin, FmssianfortrsH, surrendered
to the French, i. 333
Kntaya, Peace of, betweoa Turkey and
Egvvi,ii. 44S
EutuBD^ Sussian geomal, L 292, 437,
472,492
I^bMoy^re, Oolonel, daclarea for
Napoleon at Oronoble, ii. 84 ; ox»-
oaluni ia Mi, 08
Lafayette, iL 3S, 4S; aleoted to
Ch^bcr of Daputiea, 166; take*
part in the Bevolntian of July,
1830, 373; head of Pnnlioaal
QoverAmant, 376
Lafltto, french deputy, ii. 372; ad-
vances the- c*nw <a the Duke of
Orteaiks, 373; head of Louis
Philippe** aavemment,400 ; remgns
oHice,402
lAibuch, Oonference at, iL ISB, SOS
t«niHrtine, M., member of French
Provieicnnl Qovemment (1848), iii.
34 ; loss of power on the election of
Louis Napoleon to the Piwidency
of the Kepublic, 47
Lam berg. Murder of General, at
Pesth, iii. 74
I«morici4re, Gcoeral, lead* Papal
troops against the Piedmontese, iii.
Londrecies, Siege of, i. 90
lAndsturm, The Fruaaian, i., 363, 489
Xandwehr, The Prulsian, i. 363, 482,
489, 501
LanguiLges in Austria, L IS
lAnnes, Marshal, at the Biege of
Saragossa, i. 399
Lanskoi, Russian Minister, preparec,
wiUi Milutine, the charts tvt the
Uheration of serfs, iii. 332
Laon, Battle of, i. ASfl
Latour, Auslfian Minister, iiL 73
La Vendue, JRevolt of, i. 70, 78
lAyard, Mr., siicccefls Sir H. Elliot as
PLngliah Ambassador at Constantin-
ople, iii. G08
" Le«gue of the Three Emperors"
(1872}, iii. 478
Lengue of the Three Eingdoma (Pruaaia,
Saxony, and Hanover, tc.) iiL 139,
140
Lebceuf, French War Minister (1870),
iiL 416, 429
Lebrun, U., colleague of Bonaparte in
the Consulship, i. 210
Lecomte, General, murdered by the
Commune of Parts, iii. 470
Legislative Afliemhly, French, majority
for war againjst Austria (1792), L 3 ;
its composition, 8 ; Qirondin De-
C' 'ee, 9 ; reception of the Emperor
pold's dMpatch, 11 ; msni.
festo renouncing iutcntion of con-
quest, 14 ; determines to banish
priests, 41 ; dissolved, 48
LegisUtive Chambers, opening by
Napoleon (1816), ii. 47
Lehrbach, AMstriao Envoy to FmasiB,
L 88 ; Austrian MiniMer, 334
UODSSff SVBOPS.
Lmp^, BatUB €<, i BIO. CtiabnSaa.
at aimiTenuj at '^^'— "^^'h^ ii. 137
Le Vvit, m. 401.
Leobea, Preliiniaiii7 Tnaty oL I 138
LaOMM n. {£iiip«nt)r) addT««nB
SaropeBS Oonita on ntnatioa of
Fiench Rajal f^mil j, L 4 ; hii
dwpAtch to Faru, abumng the mr
party, 11; hit death (1792), 11,27;
liu TKilicj and work, 24 — S7
Leopold, Prinoe, of HohencoUerD-
fagmai-ingun, candidate for the
throne of S^iaiii (1868), iii. 412;
withdraws his candidature, 417
Leopold. Prince, of SaxB-Coburg,
•coepts Crown of Oieece, iL 349;
renoances tli« Qroek Crown, 3J13;
electud King of Belgium, 387
Le Queanoj, inTestment by AnBtrisns,
i.78
Leasept, H., Vtiauli envoy to Borne to
negotiate term! of peace, iii. 107
Leatocq, Pnuaian general, i. 34Q
Levant, Commeroe of the, nndsr
Hehemet Ali'a role, iL 4fi2
Ligny, Battle d^ u. 60
Liebon, entry of French troopa, i.
3G6
Literature In North Germany, i. 21 j
niippreiwion of, in Austria, 283
Lithuania, ii. 395. The nobln rebel
ngainit Rauia, iii. 337
liverpool, Lord, English Prime
tlinister, ii. 6 ; on the termB of the
■eoond Treaty of Paris, 60 ; re-
■poniible for death of Marshal Ney,
i9 ; on the proposals of the Aii-la-
Chapelle Coiiference, 132 ; onpopa-
larity, 190
I^i, Bridge of, i. 120
Lombard, Pmsaian minister, i. 273
LdTnbardy, under Maria Theresa and
the Emperor Joeoph. i. 113 i con-
quered by Bonaparte, 13S; made
a Kepublic by the tnsty of Oampo
FormJO, 148; arrival of Huaaian
army, 1S1 ; evociiatedbyAustnanB
•iter Marengo, 222 ; part of the
Ungdom of Italy, 27S ; restored
to Auatrift by Treaty of Paris, 637 ;
inaurrectinn of 1848, iii. 16; war
with Austria, S6; united with
Piedmont, 266
London, Treaty of (1827), ii. 325;
(1862). ill. 150; (1887), iu. 402;
protociJ of, 496
Lomien, work on the independence of
the Qenoan Duchiea, iii. 26.
Lormine. i. 50 ; left to n«iice by- the
OoBgresa of Tiesma, it. 70 ; probabla
oonseqaencea bad H been anoeied
to Prnssia, 72. Ceded to Germany
It tbs Treaties of Tenaillea and
£Wnkfort,iiL 464
Looia Ferdinand, Prinoe, Pmatiaa
general, i. 327
Louis XVI., letter to the L^ialatiT*
Asaembly, L 1 ; declaiw war againat
Ajiatiia (1792), 2; Bight tnm
Faria and retom (17S1), 4; con-
finement in Tuileries, 4 ; accepta
oonstitntion of National Asaemluy,
S ; manifeato to Electors of Tr^rea
and Maim, 10 ; vetoes the banish*
ment of priests, 42 ; quita the
Toileries, 44 ; eiecnliot, (8 ; hia
execution celebrated by a national
ftte, 143
Louis XVIII., reetored to the throoa
of Ftanoe, 1 631—533. Character,
iL 12, IS ; biaConstitntdon, 14 ; aum.
mona the Legislative Chambeia OB
Napoleon's return to France, 37 ;
flight from Toileries, 38 ; restora-
tion to the throne, 57 ; partiality
for Decasea, 11 6 : dissolves Chamher
otDeputiea, 117; displeasure on tlie
electioa of Qr^ire, 157 ; war
declaration against Spain, 217;
death (1824), 324
Lonia Napoleon, election to National
Aaaembly, iii. 43 ; pnaenla himself
to troops at Straaburg aa KmpCTor,
44 : sent to America, but ntoma
and repeats his attempt at Boulogne,
ij; imprisonment at Ham, ii. ;
escapes, visita Paris, is elected
Deputy, but resigns, 46 ; re-elected,
46 ; elected President of the
Bepublic, 47 ; determines to restore
th« Pope, 103; effects tho Fope'a
reetorntion, 110; protests against
the Pope's tyiannDus poli^, i5;
supported by Thiers, 167 ; letter to
Colonel Ney, 167; menage to tba
Assembly dismissing the ministry,
158 ; demands mMsoreg from new
ministry limiting the franchisB
(1850), ISO; aima at a prolonga-
tion of hi* presideni^, 162 ; aeeka ta
win the support of the wmy, 168 ;
vMe of Assembly against a ransloa
of the Constitution for prolonipitg
hia presidency, 166 ; propsrea tor a
eevp ditat, 167; demands from
Asaembly Qia re'eetablislunent of
nnireraU suffrage, 170; en^^Uut
o( December 2nd, 1861, 172; hia
proclamationB, 173 ; his reception Id
nri^ 174; pioolwmed &ap«mr
(1SG3) \n: ieeiaxtm In wSAnm at
BordeBnz tLe peaceful poliof ot
Prance, 180 ; ^pouatbsinoorpina-
tioii of Durobian Princi^aliliea with
Anitria, 236; negptiBtea wiUi
Ooimt Carour at Hombiirea, i^
^eotins *^r with Austria, 253 ;
conunanda his amiy in Italian
Mmpaign, 2B3 ; interview with the
BmpOTOT FrandB Joeeph at Villa-
franca, 2SG ; proposes a Con^resB at
Faris for the conmdaration ol
Itkliaik questions, 271 ; anneiea
Hioo and BaToy, 277; announce*
his opposition to B Said inian invasion
of the Papal States, 203; secret
den^ for extending the French
frontier, 364 ; proposes a Enropewi
Congress, ib,; meets Bismarck at
Biarrits, 3SS ; hi* Tiewa on the
interests of France as affected by
the war between Prussia and
Austria, 372 ; mediates hetween
Prussia and Austria, 377 : demands
from Bismarck the cession of
Bavarian Palatimte and western
BeSM, 380-333 ; design to nuquire
Belgium, 384 ; decline of foitune
after 1863, 396 ; tailuie o( Mexican
Expedition, 3S6-3{r9 ; negotialea
with King of Holland for the
cession of LnTemtiuig, 400 ; attitnde
towards Prussia after 1BB7, 404;
i^vate arrangements with Anstrinn
Emperor for defence against Prussia,
406 ; sects defensive Bllian(« with
Italy against Prasaia, 4DB ; failure
to secan; alliances with the Powers,
411 ; incapacity in command of his
army against PfubsIh, 437 ; snr-
renders to King William at Sedan,
446 : pliced in captivi^ at Wil-
helmshbhe, 447
tiouii I'hilippe, Dake of Orleans, ii.
363 ; marriea daughter of Ferdin-
and of Sicily, ii. ; made I.ieuten*
■nt-Gcneial of France, 371; mad»
King of Frtinc«, 378 ; policy nnd in-
flnence as citizen-liiDg, 379 ; ap-
prOTee of election of Leopold of
Saze-Coliurg aa King of Belgium,
- 387; critical rolations with Austria
■nd Russia, 402 ; Knowing unpopu-
larity, 41G ; big life attempted by
Fieachi, 417; dcdinee to assist
Spain in quelling Carlist rebellion,
437 ; intnii^ues fur the marriuge of
Us son, tbo Duke of Meiitptnsior,
with the Infanta Fernanda, tdster
g| the Qoevi at Spain, G04 ; mw-
tX. ttl
tiago of Uontpeniier to flie In-
bnta, 606 ; struggle with the Re-
form party in the Chamhers, 61 1 ;
abdicates in favonr of grandson,
the Count of Paria, and Biea from
Fans, 613
LouvHin, UniTersiW of, i. 24, 2&S
Lonvie, The, eeiied hy mob, iL 372
Lovatz, iii. 499, 601
Liiheck, loene of BIUc^mt's capitola-
tion,i. 33!
Labecki, member of Foliih eouiual, ii,
393, 394
Ijucsji, Carl of, Knglish commander
of cavalry at Balaclava, iii. 216
Luocherini, Prusaian Mimster, i. 77 ;
ambassador at Paris, 317 ; sent to
Berlin to negotiate with Hapoleon
tor peace, 334
Luneville, Peace of, i. 226, 243
Lutzen, Battle of, i. 493
Luxemburg, ii. 389 ; Napoleon IIL
negotiate* with King of Holland
for its cession to France, iii. 400 ;
declared neutral territory by the
Treaty of London (1867], 402
Lyons, tuccs armsagniDst Paris, i. 71;
surrenders to fiepuhlic, 81. Entry
of Napoleon after escaping from
Elba, li. 37 ; revolt ot workiug-
dosses (1834), 416
, 182,
tan army' against the 1
171 ; defeated by the French, 173;
disorder in his army, 1 74 ; enten
Bavaria, 287 ; capitulates at Ulm,
289
Maoniahon, General, commands Pencil
troops against Austrians, iii. 261;
, army defeated by Prussians at
Wertb, 436; marches to the t^Unt
of Bacaine at Metz, 443 ; wonndvd
at Sedan, 446 ; succoeda Thiers nr
President of the French Bepublic,
476
Uadrid, entry ot French troopa, L 374;
revolt against the French, 377;
entry of Napoleon 396; popular
domand for a cotintitiition, ii. 177
Maostrlcht, Battle of, i. 6S
Magdeburg, Fortresa of, tnrrenderod
to the French, i. 333
Magonta, Battle of, iii 261
Hnonan, General, asaiata Louis Napo-
leon in bis coup d'ilat ot Due 2,
1861, iii. 168
Magnano, Battle o^ L 181
itoDSBir xffsops.
384
Ualmiad II., Salbn oF Turkey, ii. 2BI,
2Sa, Ml ; laaniteato aftar battls of
Navarino, 33.5; dec lures Mehemet
All and hii ion Ilirahim rebels,
413 ; army defeated by If^yptmiu
>t Beilan and Ronieh, 444 : peace
al Eutaya, 446; campai)^ of
Niaaib, 4.53 ; de&th, 4S4
Uaida, BtUla of, i. 302
Hsiiii, French cmif^rnnts expellod, L
10; condiLianin 1792, 37; c&pita-
latet t« the French, 62 ; taken by
the Qermmii, 76 ; craaL meaiuiea
of the ArohbiBhop, 108; entrr of
thn Fi-ench, 167; C(iiDinu.-.ioii of
MiniBten, ii. US
Ualakoff, AMuIt on the, iii. 226 ; op-
lure of the, 226
Halmanhury, Iiord, trivia with Pr>u«ia,
i. 68: taJB opinion i>t FlIlBBil^ 94;
desfjatched to Paris to ni'^lia1«
with the Fienth Diraclory, 130,
I4S
I Beu-
, Anriistice of, belwc
mark and Pruaaia, Iii. 117
Ifalta, obt&inod by IkinapHiti', i. 167 ;
offered to RuMiia, 227: demaniled
by h'nntx for ths Knighln of ISl.
John, 237; claimed by £ii|;b<nd,
267
Manifeetj} (iw Dctcliiratlor)
Uanin, Diiniel, pulitiuil priauncr, ro-
IttLsed dun Fig JTiE^irrection of
Venica (I84N), and becomea (Jiial
of Provisional OoTornment, iii. IS ;
retiremcnton union with Piedmont,
GO ; ro-siimea office, 112
Uantculfol, Priusian Hinigt«r of the
Interior, iii. 146 ; appointed cliii't
Minister, 147 ; nniMtiiotic pali>;y.
IM; diamiBBedby the Ci'own Prinre
Rf^^t. 3U6; on the wcuknau of
the PrUKHinii army, 109
Uviteiiffel. Oeneial, son of above, iii.
3fJ6 ; l™ila troops into Holscein,
370; defeats Bavarians, SEH); mis-
sion to St. Petersburg, 384 ; con-
qqen Amiens and Rouen, 469
Mkntoa, Investment of, by Bonnparte,
i. 124; the siege raised, 126; sur-
renders to Boniiparte, 136; taken
by Austrians. IBl
Uarches, The, iii. 282 ; entry of Pied-
montese troops, 293
Manngo. Battle of, i. 221
Hant. IL. ihmmdt Fonign Himitw,
of Naplai InaTriel
Ferdinand, 429 ; oompellad to r»-
store ConstitatioQ of 1812, 439;
' i-esigns the Regency and quits
Spain, 441 ; retnnis to Spain, 442 ;
carries <}ut intrigus for the " Spanish
Marriages," 606
Maria, Donna, danghter of Emperor of
Brazil, ii. 424. 426
Maria Tbereaa, Reforms of, i. 2t
Marie Antoinette, her lite threatened,
Marie Louise of Anatria, sMond wits
of Bonaparte, i. 436
Marmoot, French general. L 614, 622.
624; cnpituUtea to the allies at
Paris, 529 Att-iclia insurgents in
Paria, ii. 370
Marmora, La, Itilian Prime lliniatar,
iii. 362 ; declines to accept Venetia
from Austria, 368 ; eomniands army
ngaJDBt Austria at Cuatoiza, 877;
attitude to wards Pnusia and FraiM^
407
Marsala. LandingoF Garibaldi's titx^
at, iii. 284
" Maiseillaiae," The, i. 11, 14
Honeillea, takes arms against Paris, L
71. Koyaiist rioU in 1816, ii. 91
Mara-U-Tour, FruKiaa attack at, iii.
216, 440
Martignao, Vicomte de, chief French
UinisliT, ii. 360; dismissed, 361
Massena, French genetal, i. 80, 179,
181, 192, 193, 217; iDrrendei*
Oenoa to the Austrians, 220 ; com-
mands in Spain, 444 ; rMreata
before the English. 446
Maubaoge invested by Austriana, L
81
138
Miiurokordatoa, Alexander, toundez of
a line of Eotpodars, ii. 261
Maorokordatos, Qreek lender (1821),
ii. 289. 293, 296, 297
Uaamiliaa, Emperor of Uexioo, bH
and death, iii. 399
MauB, Prison of, iii. 173
Mnixini leads incursion into Bamj
(1834), ii. 413, 414; eialt«d
patriotism, 468. At Romo, in
1849, iiL 103; offers to assist
Victor Emmanuel in the eabibliah-
ment of Italian union. 270 ; pitt-
jeot fur Lha capture of Roma 41^
Vmioe, 287 ; letter to Bimuok «
Hajwlecn's tcMlTe fo oiaka wiir on
Prnnu, 110 (note)
Ifedid, The, L 116
Mohmoet Ali, Fnahti and Viceroy of
BgTpt, ii. 301, 302; Don Qict with
Turkey, *12, US; sends uuiy into
PBleatme, ■Hi; victories uvHr
Turks, 4M ; Peace of Kutayn gives
Syria uid Adana to him, 44G ^ i^hii-
iHcter ol his rale, 461 ; Becond war,
46i); relinqnishea conquered pro-
linuee, 461 ; Egypt oonterred upon
MolaH, Aiutrian genenl, L 21T, 22Q
HeckleabuTK, i. 36
Uendiaabal, succeeds Torenoaa Bptuiish
War Miaistor {1836], ii. 438
Henotti leads inaurrection at Modeon
(1831), ii. 399
Menou,_ French general, i. 234, 230
Menscbikofl, Prinoe. Russian Envoy to
Constantinople, iii. 18S ; commands
Russians in the Cnmea, 211
Ifentiuia, Battle of, between Oari-
balctians and Papal troops, iii. 403
Uesscnhauser, commandar of Tolun-
leers duria^ the revolt of Vienna
(1848), iu. 78
U«uinn, rising aguinst Neapolitan rule,
ii. 474. Bombarded by Ferdintiod
of Naples, iii. 112 ; suirendered to
Sardinian troops, 298
Heltemich, Auatiian Ambassador at
Berlin, i. 281; Am(assador at
Faris, 403; Austrian Minister, 433 ;
foreign policy of 1813, 496; |>alii.-y
doriog the War of LibeniUon,
610. President of Oie Congress of
Vienna, ii. 20; his denrnnds re-
specting the second lYcaty of
Paris, 60 ; Austria under his atatea-
manBhip, S2 ; Conservative prin-
ciples, 13.*; influence in Europe.
136 ; advice to Kinf; Frederick
William on the univor»iti<ga, gym-
nastic ostablisbmODts, and (he
Proas, 137 ; tabes meanurus to pre-
*ent a German rerolutiua, 142;
opposes Bavarian and Baden Con-
stitutions, 144 ; requisiliouB at the
Conference of Carlsbad, 145; in-
fluence at the Conference of
Tnippan, 194 ; Eastern policy, 279 ;
coodeinnation of the Qreek revolt,
283 ; views with disgust the Anglo-
BuBsian protocol fur iiitorvention
in Grpoca, 322 ; efforts to form a
coalition against Russia, 340; in-
tervention in Papal States, 402;
ligoroni EBeHiiTCi torepi«M Liberal
nQ«rawny, 1
Lustrian Ihd
movenents ii ., . ,
policy in Austrian Italy, 47G ;
itatancnt respecting inaiurection
in Qalida, 493. Besignation during
Revolution of 1848, iu. 8 ; flight to
England. 8 ; return to Vienna, 152
Uctz. lit. 425, 428; capitulates to the
PmaaianB, 466
Mexico, Expedition of France to, iii.
396—398; mc«ll of French troops,
and fiUl and de:ith of S' ' "' "
Oonimissiun, 495
Miguel, Don, son of King John of
Portugal, lead! cDoapiracy against
the Cortes, iL 228 : causes himself
to be proclumed King of Portugnl
<1828), 42i ; his violence, ii. ; bia
fleet destroyed off SL Vincent hy
volonteer force under Captain
Charles Xapier, 426 ; unites with
Don Ciirbis, 429 ; defeated and re-
moviid ti-om Portu^^il, 430
Milan, portion of Austrian dominkini, '
i. 19; Bonaparte's triumphal entry,
120; surrenders to Bussians and
Austrians, 181. Insurrection of
1848, iii. IS; entry of Auatriana,
61 ; evacuation by Aiistdans, 261
MiLizKO, Bittlo of, iii. 236
Milutine, Miuholus, ptepuree the charter
tm- the liberatiou of Russian serfs,
iii. 332; carries out in Putund the
Riis.siun meoHuros for division of
land amongst the peasantry, 333
Uina, Spanish genoml, ii. 169, 2D9 ;
leads troops ag.iinat Carlists, 434
Mincio, BatUe on the,i. 122
Uinghetti, Italian Prime Minster, iii.
361
Hinto, Lord, on Uie dedgos of Austria
in Italy, i. 186, 187 (note)
Miranda, General, i. 68-
Missolonghi, Siege of, ii. 297; second
siege, 308 ; re-taken by Greeks,
347
Hodena, portion of Oispadane ttepnb-
lio,i. 132; Congress of , 134. In-
corporated with PiedmontesB m n-
archy, iii. 58, 276
Hodena, Doke of; his tyranny, ii.
467. Flight from his dominions, iii.
261
Mohnmmedans, in Greece, ii. 243,
246 i massacre of, in the Morea,
m; attacked in Oattni Qneoe, m
3R)1)SSN SXmOFB.
HoldkTfa, propond anneiation to
B>uBi>,L 34tt; tiiiagof the Greeks,
ii. SA9. "Batrj at BuHsian troops
(IMS), iiL 192; pioposeil muon
with Wall&ahu, 23fi ; autiuU union,
aae
MBUeDdorf, Oaieral (PniMian), tkkea
poMeMion of Weiteni PoUnd, i,
B8; defcalaPftt'a object ingrantiiig
a. Hilwidy to PrnMiA, M
Ibltke, General, otganijaB Turldali
MmT, iL 4C t ; in the ounpaign of
1S3S,1S3. Directs the moveineiitt
of Pnunm ttoopi against Austria
(1866),iii. STG; plans for war iriUi
0866), i
426;
capilulation ot Sedan, 446
IfoDUtoiea, dinolvad, in Anstria, i
23; in German]?, 263; in Papal
Btata by NapolsOD, 437 ; in Spcun,
464. Bsstorsd in Spain, ii. 12 ; lo.
stored in Naples, 179
Hontalembert, M., spokesoian in
French Ifatianal AsBemily on }».
half of CathoUdsm, iii. 186.
UontUIiard, iii. 461
Uontenearo, Uket arms Rsainit Tur-
key, iii. 238 ', supports t£e rsTolt of
HcnogoTina, 477 ; declarea war
■gainBtTurkoy,482 ; independence
recognised tiy tha IVeaty of San
Stefano, £10
Honterean, Battle of, i 62fi
Hcmtaaquieu, ii. 108
Hontg^aa, Bavarian Minister, f. 2fiS ;
treatment ol Tyroleso liishope, 411
Honthien, French general, i, 374.
Hontoiorency, French Minister, , ii.
206 ; represents Fiance at Con^rrefli
of Vcruna, 216 ; retires from ofiice,
217
Moore, Sir John, campiign in Spain,
i. S96 ; death at Oorunna, 398
Uoravia, Junction of Jtussian and
Austrian troops in, i. 2B3.
Horea, 'Xho, ii. 263; Greek rising,
273 ; Bei-ond ravolt, 2S9
; invades
Ger
, 126; advan
the Russians in I^omtiardy, 182;
adrsnces against tho Austriaita,
218 : charged with conapii-ing
against BoDapsrte, 276 ; at the
Battle of Dresden, fiOS
Korelli, Neapolitan insurgent, ii. 182,
203
Momy, half-brother of Lonis Napo-
leon, iii. I6T
lloipeth, Lord. Englisli Enroy to
374
HoBoow, entn of the French, i. 460;
burning o^ ii. ; departure of Napo-
leon, 471
Mountain, Polidcal party of the, L 49 ;
becomes powerful in the Conveiv-
tiou, 66 ; vietOTj ovor Oirondina,
71 ; attacked by Girondini aitd
Boyalists, 71 ; its power incieMe^
72
Hoxart, i. 108
Hukhtar Pasha, iii. 498, 606
Mulgfcave, Lord, on the Russian ckn^
paign in tiombardy, i. 186 (note)
Miinclieugrati, meetioK place of em-
perors of Runia and Austria in
1833 to consort for the Buppreaeioii
of revolutionary nioTemonts, iL
413.
Miinster, Bishopric of , i. 1 29, 149, 167
Murat, French general, L 80, 293;
Beizpa Fmssian touitory, 316;
dai|>atched to Spain, 373; enten
Madrid, 374; ciutty tactics, it,;
allied with Austris, fi37. Troachery
towards allies in 1814, ii, 6 ; flight
from Naples, 42
MuraviefE, General, Russian Envoy to
Conatantinople, ii. 416. Crushes
the Polish rebellion (1864), iiL 337
Napier, Sir Cliarlea, deattoys naT)t of
Don Miguel off St. Vincent, ii
426; captures Acre, 460
Naples, allied with Eiigliind against
Fiajice, i. 69 ; strengthened ^ de-
tlnictiun of Fieneh Hect at Toulon,
82 ; condition in eighteenth cen-
tury, 116; joins coalition between
England, Rusaia, and Turkey
aguinst Fiance, 166 ; fliglil; of the
roj'al family, 174 ; riots, 176 ; entry
ot the French, 176 ; conveitod into
the Parthenopean Republic, it. ; at-
tacked by tanatii'B, led by Canlinal
Ruffo, 1B2; Kuflo'B negtitiaUons f..r
peace,183 ; arrival ot Nelson's fioet,
ib. ; a reign of terror, 184 ; Admiial
Oaracciolo executed with Nolaun'i
seoclion, IBI; peace with Francs
(1801) 227; flight of King Fer-
dinand, 301 : the throne given to
Josmh Bonapnrto, 301 ; aftd^
wards to Murat, 439. Fall of
Murat, ii. 41 ; restoration of King
Ferdinand I,, 42 ; conditioil from
181ft— 1820,.1T8; thsCtrbonan wid
aieCUd«nri,181i HonlHNinTClt,
182; coiutitutlon deolated, 184;
couferenca at Troppaa betwoen the
SovereigDis of AuBtria, Bnaoa, and
Frasma, lespecting Neapolitaii
aftaizB, 1S3; luminoned bj con-
fennce of Tioppaa to a^tandoD iU
couBtitntion, IBS ; invaded bj
Austria and letami to despotism,
202, 203 ; Ferdinand IL, 474 ; con-
■titutioiigranted,47&. Insurrection
of Hav, 1848, iii. 57; death of Ferdi-
nand II., and aoosasion of Frandl
IL, 281 ; rojeots the constitutional
nstsm propoeed hy Oivour, 282 ;
Chyour's double policy with regard
to, 289; adTance of Oariboldi's
troops and Baidinian fleet upon,
280; flight of King Francis, 291;
tiiamphsnt entry at Giirihaldi, 293
Hapoleon I., Bonaparte, Serves st the
siege of Toulon, L 81, 82 (note) ;
defends the Convention against the
Boyaliita, 102 ; appointed to the
oommsjid of tlie army in Italy,
110; his cajolery, 118; triomphal
Hitiy into Milan, 120; defeats
Anstrians on tb« Hinoio, 122 ;
seines L^hotit, 124 ; inTeata
Hantoa, 126 ; takea Eoveredo and
Trent, 128: oreates the Ciiipadane
Bepublic in Italy, 132; defonts
Austriana at Areola and Bivoli,
134, 136 ; DPgotiationa with the
Pope, 136; eaters Venice, and ofiers
it to Austria, 139—141; trratment of
Genoa, 142 ; sends Ani^ercau to
intimidate the Direotory, 14fi ;
Treaty with Austria at Cam^
Fornuo, 147 (and note) ; his policy in
1797, ISO; designs to attack GRypt,
162; intervenes in Switzerland,
160; Egyptian Oampaign, 16S— 108;
obtains Malta, 167; victory over
Tnrks at Abooldr, 200 ; retams to
France (1799), 201; mn^ d'itat of
Bmmaire, 202 ; appointed First
Consul, 206 ; his policy and rule,
311 — 313 ; makes proposals of peace
to Austna and England, 21G ;
campaign against the Anstrians in
Italy, 218—322 ; peace of Luneville,
326 ; peace of Amiena, 238 ; his ag-
gresedons after the peace of AiYiiana,
243; made President of Italian
Sepublio, 244 ; his interrention in
Switzerland, 246; his settlement
of Qermsny, 247—261; hia Civil
Code and Concordat, 368~3SG;
mieWB the WW with £ng>iu),
C 5W
26B ; occnpatiiMi d Hanow, 360 ;
det^minee to become Emperor,
374 ; assumes the title of Emperor,
276 ; aooepts the title of King of
Italy, 379 ; £iiliire of naval designs
agsinst Ei:^land, 384 ; victory over
Atistriana at Mim, 380 ; victory of
Aastdrlits, 296; appoints Joseph
Bonaparte King ol Naples, 801 ;
styles himself the "new Ctwrle-
maone," 302; gives the orown of
Holland to Louis Bonapartsi 303;
compels Jerome Bonaparte to marry
the daughter of the King of Wiir-
temberg, 303 ; bis organisatioii of
Western Germany, 303 ; negotiatea
far the cession of Bitiiy to his
brother Joseph, 316; war against
Prussia, 1806, 326—837; entsn
Berlin, 333; njba Frederioic the
Qreat'l tomb, ^. ; determines to
extinguish the commeroe of Great
Britain, 336; enten Poland, 33B;
Polish campaign, 840 ; Eylau, 341 ;
Friedland, 346; interview with
the Emporor of J '
Niemen, 348 ; i
Prussian territory, 847 ; Tieatiet
of Tilsit, a. ; conspiracy with
the Emperor of SuBsia, 348 ;
attitode towards England after
the bombardment of Copeohagen,
3S3 ; his demands npon Portugal,
364 ; orders the banishment of
Stein, PmssiBii Minister, 366; de-
signs in Spain, 368, 371 ; receivea
the orown of Spain, 377; treats
with Prosaia for the French
evacnation, 389; at Erfurt, 390;
Spanish campaign, 394 ; {Jans
for campsign against Austria
( 1 800), victories over AustrtBUS, 416;
enters Tieuna, 116 ; passage of the
Danube, 420 ; defeated at Aspem
by the Austrians, 421 ; second
passage of the Dannba, 424 ; defeats
AnatriaDS at Wagram, 426 ; peaoe
with Austria, 430 ; divorces
Josephine, and marries Uarie
Louise of Austria, 436 ; annexes
Papal Sts tea and iseioommunicated,
436 ; annexes Holland, Le Valais,
and North Qermon coast, 438;
beneflts and wrongs of his rule in
the French Empire, 440 ; blocdcade
of British commerce, 441 ; alliance
with Prussia, 1812, 459; alliance
with Austria, 460 ; invasion id
Bosaia and retreat, 463 — 477 ; cam-
jajgo in Qermany aRainit PrntA
UQUXBN SVnOFB.
and Runia, 490 — 49S; anten
Onaden, ^S^ \ attitude tommla
Anatria in 1B1 J, ISfi ; Anitria join*
hi! memiu. 60 1 : batUca of DrsMlen,
60S ; Oroabaeren, Deanswiti, 508 ;
defeatad by the alliea at Leipaig,
SIS; retreat amMB the Rhine,
SIT; (smpaignof 1B14, S24— 626;
dethronement by pnxjamation of
Qm Senate, 631 ; abdicatea in
taTDnr of infaot ton, 63S ; aent
to Elba, it. ; ranilta of bis war* on
Europe, 642. HotiTea for modera-
tion m 1807 napectinff Poland, ii.,
S i leavee Elba, 3 1 ; lands in Fmnce,
Z% ; eaten Grenoble, S4 ; declan-
tion of hii pnipoae, id ; entere
LyoDB, 37 ; enten Ftuia, 38 ;
oatlaved b^ the Congreaa of
Tianna, ii. ; aboliahea the ilave-
Ivade after return from Elba, 7S ;
prqarea for war, 40; t>lan of
campaign, 48; Waterloo, 63 — 66;
flight to Parta, and abdication,
6i ; conveyed to St. Helena, fiB
Napoleon III. («m Louii Napoleon).
Napoleon, Fiinoe Jcrume, iii. 263 ;
betrothed h) FrinwHe Clotilde, 256
Narraei, head of Spanish Oovemment
(1843), ii. 442
Naaaau, annexed to Pmana, iii. 37 B
Na«»aa. Doke of, L 2fiS
National AsHmblj (Fnuioe), de-
stawra power ot the Crown and
nobility, i. S ; ita inteipretalion ot
the nmnifeslo of Pillniti, 5; ita
Oonititution accepted by Louii
XTI., 6; dinolTcd {IT91), 6; ill
beneficial work, 6, 7
National Debt (in England), i. 341
Nauplia, Siefe of, ii. 307
Navarino, Surrender of, to Greelc in-
■UTgenta, ii. 200; capitulat«a to the
Egyptians, 306; battle of (1827),
S30— 333
Navarre, head-quarters of Carliat in-
■nrgenta (1834), iL 431
Nelson, Adiniial (Lord), deatroys
French fleet at the battle of the
Nile,L ISS; hii reception at Naples,
I6S; takea the Neapolitan royal
family to Palermo, 174 ; retuma to
NaiJea,lS3; execntion ot Admiral
Oaracciolo,tB4;hi8difllil[eotThugu(
IM (note) ; superiority of hii eea-
man, 107; at the battle oi Copen-
hngen, 231 ; rtatemmt in the House
ot LordB, reapocting Malta and the
Cape of Good Hope, 242; pursues
Am XtauHi in the Wert Indict,
2B6 ; victory of Tnhl^i, mal
d«th, 200
Nemoura, Due de, elected King of tha
Belgians, ii. 387; election annnlled
by Louis Philippe, it.
Netherlands (j» HdUand, Belgian,
and Flanders]
NeutnOity, Armed, of 1800, i. 228
Ney, French genenl. i. 341, 396, 475,
476, 494, 608, ii. 37; at the battle
of auatre Bras, 51 ; at Waterloo.
64 ; execution, 98 ; dumdar, 100
(note)
Ney, Colonel (son ot Uarahal Ney), liL
110; letter to, tnno Louis Napo-
leon, ler
Nice, annexed to France, L 64 ; re-
stored to Sardinia (1BI4), 637.
Annexed to Franr«, iii. 277; effect
of the annexation on Eunipe, 279
Nichulas (Empi-ror of Huasia), ii. 319;
K'ncipio of autocratic rnle, 820;
k of iiympnthy with the Oi«elm,
321 ; policy toinuda Poland dming
insurrection ot 1830, 305 ; invaaim
of Poland, 396. Attempln to mediate
between Frusua and Austria re-
specting; affairs id HesBe-GuiBel, iii.
146 ; visits England in 1844, and
see^ to negotiate with respect to
Turkey, the " sick, or dying- man,"
182 ; polity in 1648, 183 ; dnmanda
the Hurrender of Hungarians from
Turkey, 1?4 ; affronted at Turtoy's
oonosMiotiB to Francs respecting
Holy Phices in Palestine, 187 ; oc-
cupies the PrincipHlities, 192 ; war
with Turkey, 197; with Enghuid
and Fnuioe, l'J9; rejeots the
" Four Feints," 209 i death (1866),
210
Nioholas, Gnuid Duke, iii. 606
NicoUburg, iiL 37S
Nicopolis, iii. 498, 409
Niebuhr, the historian, L 367. Repliea
to Schmala'B pamphlet, ii. 124
Niel, French general in Uw Crimea
iii. 224
Nightingale, Florence, iii. 219
Nigra, Italian Ambauesador at Paria,
report on the idons of Napoleon III.
respecting a CongrssB, iii. 373
(not*,)
Nile, Battle of the, L 168
Nismes, lOyiOitt outrage* in 181S, ii
92
Nissib, Battle of, between Tarki and
I^yptians, ii. 464
Normandy, la^ armsagainst Paris, i
Noiwafi given to Bemadotte, Crown
Frinoe of Sweden, iL S
NoTtuB, BatUe of, between Austriuu
aod Sardiniaiia, iii. 100
Novi, B^Ule of, i IBl
Odessa, ii. 360
OlliTier, H., Proaidant of Preacb
Cabinet (1870), iii. 416;aveTMto
war with Prueeiu, it., 421 ; ignor-
■DCe of Uie condition of tha army, .
429; reasDB^<">i *''^^
Olmiitz, iii. 77 ; eonvontion of, rs-
ipeetiag tfaa diaaolution ol the
PrusBiaa TTnion, and Uio roco^i-
tion of the diet at Frankfort by
Prussia, 147
Oltenitsa, iiL I>7
Omar Paaha, defeati Busainns at
Oltenitxa, iu- 197
Oporto, FaU of, i. 401. Bovolulinn at,
iL 187; taktmby DoQpedn)(183'J),
426; besieged by Don Uigiiel, iA.
Orkani, taken by the Fnmiana, iii.
463 ; re-taken by the Frenrh, and
•gain occupied by the FruBaiuoa,
4G7, 458
Ornni's cootpiraoy, iii. 279
Omniui Pasha, iii. 499, 600; surrender
to the Kuaaianji at Flema, 604
Otho, Kinr of Qreece, ii. 354
Ott, AuBtnan general, i. 220
Ondinot (1) French general, i. 503,
604, 606
Ondinut (2), French general, sent
109
. 105, 106 ;
Palatinate, Bavarian, ii. 408; n-
actionary meaBures ugiuntt Liberal-
Palatine, Elector, i. 247
Palenno: roTOlation of 1848. ii 474.
Surrendered toFurdinand ol Naplea,
iii. 113; oaptmod by Garibaldi,
who afflumca thii dictatorshtu of
Kdly, 285, 2S6;'l>epretia uppoiuted
Fro-Diutator, 288
Palestine, diipate between France and
Butaia reep«iiting Holy Places in,
iii. 186—189
Paleatro, Battle of, between AuHtriana
and PiedmontoH, iii. 261
Falikao, Count of, succeeds Ollivier as
the hoad of tlte Franob Uiniatij,
in. 433
Ttlm, Gemtaa bookasDar, exaeuted
bj Napuleon'i oiders, i. 322
Palmaratou, Luid, ii. 389; as Foreign
SeurebLry securas indmnnity from
Portui^iese Oovemuent for attack
o share witl
SuuniwH of inteiveiiliou in Spain
>r quelling the Carlist rebellion,
4117; viewuf thegiuwth of Bu&iian
power, 465 ; obatiiiouy on the
EMStem queation (18-tU), 467, 460;
BixepU airangemonta settling
I'^gypt upon Mahemet All, 461 ;
uroposea a marriago l>etween a
Prince of Sue-Coburg iind the
Quoen of Spain, 606. Advice to
Aiutria Tsapectiiig Lomliardy, iii.
69; ou the diiisolutioa of the
Turkish Empire, IBO (note); favoura
war with Kuaeia, 196 ; Miiccecds
Lord Aberdeen as Prime Minister,
219 ; policy during; Crimean War,
238; attitude during Duniah war,
3o4
Papal Infallibility, i. 263
Papal Slates, allied with England
agfti net Fiance, i. 59; ceeaiunof part
by Truaty of Toleatino, 1 36 ; annei-
ation by Napoleon, 436. Insurrection
of 1831, ii. 399; intervention of
Austria, and suppression of revolt,
402 ; second iusuirection, and
second Auatrian intervention, 4U4.
Events of 1848-9, iii. 97 ; 103-110;
Sardinian troops occupy Umbrin
and the Marches, and capture
Antona, 293, 294 [aiiJ «« Rome)
Paris, ExaaperatioD in, against Louis
XVI., i. 4; Austria di^mands an
anti-democratic govemmput in, 12 ;
inauTTection of August 10, 1792,
44 ; September Massacres, 46 ;
overthrow of the Gironde, 71 ; .
insurrection against (hu conven-
tion, 102 ; amp d'iiat of Fructidur,
return of Bonapurto, 201; coup
Xitat, 18 Brumaire, 1799, 202; sur-
rendered to tho allies, 629 ; arriTol
of Louis XVIII., 533 ; treaty of,
636. Napoleon's entry after leaving
Elba and ilight of King Louis, ii.
38; Napoleon's arrival after the
defeat of Waterloo, 66 ; entry of
allies, 67 ; Fonchi appointed head
of the Provisional Oovermuent, 68 ;
reafonitian of King Louia, 67 ;
second treaty of, 82; meetinjj of
council of smbMwdow, 79; insur-
lectiw d Jiilf, tS», 870 i QQlol
MODSBX BUBOPS.
da Tille auad by iosnrgwifa, U. ;
uunTgenta khes Tnilsiiei and Uia
Lonne, ST2 ; iuBurrecUoiu, 1832—
IBM, 416—417 1 Fi»chi's attempt
on the life of Louii Philippe, 417 ;
levolutioil oi Fsbruury, 184S, and
■bdicatiaD and flight of Louii
Philippe, G13; Beuuhlic proclaimed,
ik. BiototHa;,]!!. 38; inturreotion
of workmen, JuiLe,40; Archbishopuf
Pftria killed, 4 1 ; Louis Napoleoa'i
mtp d'itat of Dec. 2, 18fil, 176;
Treaty of (1858), between RosBiH,
Oreat BriUin, and ollict, 230 ; re-
ooDBtmction oL in the reign of
Napolton III., 396 ; comternation
after BatUo of Worth, 437 ; inre^
ment by the Qermana, 4S0; eor-
tiea, 458, 4S9 ; forty tbuumnd
of the iijiabitanti perish during
the siagQ, 492; capitulaticm. 4ti3j
entry of the OarmoiiB, Mufth 1,
1871, 465; inBurrection of the
Commune and National Guard,
withdrawal ol Goveminent tnxipa
to VerBaillc*, and second Bicge,
488 — 470; di.'slructi on wrought by
the Commune, Hod re-entry of Oo-
Temment troops 471
Paris, Anhbishop of, mortally woimdod
in inBurreclion of June, 1848, ui.
41
ParlB, Count of, ii. 513
I'srker, English admiral, i. 231
Parma, inoorporatwi with Piedmontoso
Monarchy, iii. 68; nnit™ with
tlodena under the dictatoisbip of
Farini. 267
Parma, DuchoBS of, iii. 2S1
338;
:e of, i. 1
9, 208
Patriarch of Constantinople, iL 243;
eiecutinn, 275
Paul, Emperor of Ruasia, I 168 ijoins
thenccond coalition, 189; Buapicions
of Austria, 189; propisoa European
Congrees, 190 ; hatred to England,
227 ; hie iiBGaBidn:itioD, 232
pBvia, Pillage of, by the French, i.
122
Peeaantry, poirition imprOTed in Austria
by Lco|K>ld II., i. 26, 26 ; Serfdom
in PrDsma, 35 ; of France. 36 ; con-
dition in minoi States of Qermany,
38 ; patrintism in Prance, 48 ; revolt
iniA Veadik>, 70; in Fmnce, 1795,
99; in Italy, 112; T^voJt in Lom-
b«My aigsiiwt the ifrench, 121 1
fanptOTed podtion in Vwimot owing
to theIteTolution,181; otSvitaer-
land, 162; Neap^dUan, 174; ra-
L'eved in Qenumv, 265 ; impn*».
ment in Proetia after Stan's edict,
3G0; English in 1807, SSI; in
Spain, 381 jTyToIcseriKagof 1809,
411, 413. In GreeoB, ii. 238; in
Poland, 301 ; in Hiuijjary {1832),
4S1, 491. Emancipation in Hun-
gary, iiL 10 ; converted into iudo-
pondjent propriotoTB in Austria, 82 ;
rising in Ronmonia, 85; eman'ipa-
tion in Rusain, 331 ; made L.nd-
ownon in Poland by Rusaia, 339
Pedro, Don, Emperor at Brazil, re-
nonnciw Crown of Fortngal. ii. 229 ;
invades Portugal, and enlors Lisbon
on the destruction of the Constitu-
tion by Miguel. 426, 427
Pee], Sir Robert, English Prime
Minister, iii. 188
PcIisBier, General, French oomnundor
in tJiG Crimea, iii. 225
Pcpe, Neapolitan gtmeral, ii. 183, 184,
202; :
.67
Perier, Casimir, ' BucceedB I^tta as
F^^ch Premier, ii. 402 ; sends
troops to occupj; Ancona, 404 ;
death, 405; paciBo policy mia.
undontood, 415
Perrano, Sardinian admiral, iii. 285;
excites insurrection at Naples by
Count Cavour's orders, 290; refera
his diary to Azeglio, 292 (note)
Pereigny, confidant of Louis Napoleon,
iiL 167
Posth, bri^e uniting the double
.capital of Hungary, ii. 482. Demo-
cratic movement headed by Kossuth,
iii. 10 ; meeting of Parliament at,
TO; J^Iadc mai«hi!S againiit, 72;
martial law proelaimed, 74 ; occu-
pied by Austrrans, 8B ; evacuated
by them, 90 ; but re-occupied. 94.
Petrobei, leader of Greek revolt in tlui
Morea, li. 289
Fhannricts, The Greek, ii. 251
Philhellenee, Corps of, ii. 296
Philippopolis. iii. 604
Pichegru, French general, I. 87;
enters Antaerp, 03; conquers Hol-
land, 96 ; charged with complicitj
in plot against Bcmaparie, .75
Piedmont, social conditi on in ng hteenth
century, i. 117; Bonaparte's aoo-
oesBes, 119; aimexed to Franca.
246. InsurreDtion in, ii. 203. ErunU
of 1848-9, iii. 17, 56—62, 1-5-103;
(-cclesi^iBtical ref<vm uiuIbi Tiotw
o d'Aieglio,
143 ; C&voor, Uiniotar, 214 ;
■Hied vith France in war against
Aiutria,2fi6; movement inOuiitnl
Ualj for nnion with, 26 1 ; union
with Toacany, PnmUi, Moduna, itad
Ui« Bomagna, 276 : aoion of Naplea
and Sicily with, 381—297 ; troops
enter UrabrU imd the Marohea, and
amie Anoona, 293. 294
Pillnils, Emperor LeopfJd II. and
Fradiriok mUitun II. meet tA, i.
Pitt, William, liew ol French Revolu-
tion, i. &T; attempts to unite
Europe BgHinat Fiance, &B ; Liberal
Colioy, 62 ; giBnta Babaidy to
PmnlB, 88 ; attempts to suppten
Jacobinism, 107 ; enters into nags'
tiations for peace vith French
Directory, 130 ; his scheme of a
ooalitdon against France lavoured
by the Emperor Pan!, 169; "-"
the TTnion of Great Britain and
Ireland, 239 ; again Prime Minister,
27S; death, 30S; his "Austerliti
look," ib. (note]
Vme VL, Pope, Aastria claims indem-
nification for him from France for
the losi of Avignon and the
Venaissin, i. 12; his armistics with
Bonaparte, 124 ; submits to Bona-
pttrte, and cedes Bologna, Ferrani,
and Romagna, 136 ; his authority
nmounoed by the Roman people,
166; removed by the French to
Tnacany, and afterwards to Valence,
where he dies, ii. ; King Ferdi-
nand's latter to him, 173
Fiua TIL, Pope, eicommunicates
Bonaparte, and is imprisoned at
Savoua, L 436. Resents attempt of
Anstria to gain Bologna and Ra-
publisIuM amnettty for political of-
fences, ii. Diaavowa sympathy with
the war of the IiombaHU a^inst
Austria, iii 66 ; flight from Rome
■flar murder of Ho«d, 97 ; restora-
tion by the French, 110; seeks to
taebBO the Inquisition, 110; re-
foses to oonaider any proposals for
Italian reform, 273 ; indignation at
(be doctrines in thepompUet, "The
Vopa and the OongnM," 271 ; loaea
Sanipoial paver l^tt* Xtaliaa oo-
rX KM
oapation ot Bome, hat !■ gnannteed
various rights by the Italian Par-
liament, 473
Plevna, Battles at, liL 460— fiOI ; fall
of, fi04
Poland, Designs of Austna snd Pmsma
against, i. S3, 83; Oobden's views
on the partition ot, 34 (note);
saoond partition of, S3 ; revolt, SB ;
third partition, 97; Napoleon enters,
338 ; establishment of Duchy of
Warsaw, 347. Probable re-
mits in the Polish kingdom had
at Oongrass of Vienna, 23, 24;
Duchy ol Waraaw made Kingdom
of Poland under Alexander L,
Emperor ol Russia, 80 ; Alexan-
der addresses Polish Diet, on his
dueign to extend popular reproaen*
tation, 121 ; insurrection at War-
saw (IS301, 392; in\-aded by Russia,
896 : Busnans capture Waraaw,SB7;
becomesaprovinceof BiiB>Da,tA. ; re-
volt in Pruadaand Austrian Pohmd
(I84S),492. Condition in 186I,iii.333;
tumults at Waraaw, 334; Oiaad
Duke Conabuitine appointed Vice-
roy at Waraaw, 334 ; levy, and in-
sarrection (1863), 33S ; a secret Na.
tional Qovemment, 336 ; (Jenoral
Moravieff orushea the rebellion
in Lithuania, 337 ; ownership of
land given to the peasantry, 338 ;
the Cear's endeavours to Rosaiantse
sodal and national life, 340
Polignao, Juloi. chief French Minister,
ii. 361 ; project to suspend the Con-
stitation, 36fi
Portland, Duke of, Prime Uioister, i
343
Portugal, allied with England against
France, i. G9 ; Napoleon's dsmanda
upon, 854 ; Treaty of Fontainebteau
for the partition of, 36S ; flight of
the Regent to Brazil, 856 ; the
French enter Lisbon, 366 ; entry of
British troops under Sir Aruiur
™" -'sy, 885; BattUof Vindeiro,
" ' by the French, ii. ;
Wellesley drives Sonlt from Oporto,
42S ; holds Tones Vedraa aud
drives Mawena bock, 44G. Refuses
to abtdiah slavo-trada, ii. 7S; afiaira
from ISOT— 1820, I8S— 189 ; revo-
Intira at Oporto^ 187 ; Don Pedro
gaaOa k Ooastitotioa, 229; d»>
•ertiuuef Mldicrf, 380; d«iiuitd»
MODSBN StmOPS.
-—'■*"~' from KigUnd •gsinrt aU
•ttack, ii. ; Don. UiKuel amoM
himnlf to be pToclniroed King. 42S;
Conatitutioti dHtnyud, it. ; lUaga
ol Terror, it. ; attutka \jf Sliguel
on Engli»h and French Bubjecta,!*.;
inTaaiou !» tbe Emperor Pedm,
436; En^uh and li'nmoli squad-
ma* Kpptax in the Tapiu and pro-
enm indsmnity, ib. ; Dun Pedro
cabnIiiiboii,42T ; Miguel defeated
•ltd expelkd from the Fsninsula,
to,m. 120
Pregne, Camgnu of, L COO. Biota
(1848), iii. 64 ; Troaty of, 179
Frenalau, i. 381
Pnabur^, ili. 9, 11, 13
PrMburg, Trestj of, i. 299
Frew, Cenaorahip of, rastored in Bpain,
u. 10; in Fnmce, ISO
FresB, Freedom of Uie, eabiblifihed in
FnnMby Louia XVIIL, ii. IS; at
Jena, 137 ; Mettemich propoaea
leatcictions in Germany, 137 ; re-
atrictiona ordered by Conferenca of
Ckrlabad, 145 ; reeLrictiausinFisnoe
nnder Charles X., 369 ; freedom ex-
tended in Genuany, 408 ; Buppt«s-
aion of jounuUs in Genoany dnring
the rmction of 183Z, 411); Bis-
marck'a luppreaaive meaaurea in
Fniaua, 421
Prim, Gaieml, chief movar in Spaniah
Kevoludon (1868], iii. 412
Protestantitm, of Korlheni Germany, L
13; Emperor Fcrdinand'ahatred of,
20; Bohemian I'rotialimta lose
thrar eatatee, 20; ila Burrival in
Hungary, ii, ; its eitenaion in Ger-
many, 268
PrDHsiB, State of, before the war of
1792, L 30 ; rule of Ftederick the
Qrest in, 30 ; poverty of, 30 ; ab-
■anca of politiial opinion in, 31 ;
■odal Byatem, 34 ; allied with
Aottria agninat Fraoca, 42 ; invades
France, 42; evacuataa I'Vance, 4S;
beaiegea Mtum, 76 ; leeka to pie-
vant Anilria from gaining Bavaria,
Anatria, 86 ; aiibAdiaed by England,
BB ; trea^ of peace with Fituue at
Baale, 04; at the CooKmsa of
Baatadt, 1£6; joina the Murthem
Mantim* league, 228 ; interesta
Jb OerauBf , 348 ; iaaotiai witb i«-
gati to Hanorer, >69 ; tbe King'*
diwiinulation on the acquiailion of
Hanover, 312; axclodea Engliah
ahipatrom the porta, 314; renela
aeiud by British navy, 314 ; Stinn
eipotea the character of Pruaaian
Uiaiaters, 318 ; demoraliaad sUla
of the army (1806], 319—321 ; do-
foatsd by the Fimch at Jens
and Aneistiidt, 3:28, 329 ; entry of
Napoleon into Berlin, 332 ; capitu-
lation of fortraasea to tlie French,
ii, ; large ceasiona of territoTy tu
France^ 347 ; condition after tbe
pusce of Tilsit, 356 ; Stein's edict for
the abolition of serfage, 358; re-
form of army, 362 ; plaiu for war
against Napoleon, 389 ; terms with
Napoleon for the French evacua-
tion, 391 ; aoeka the aid of Buasia
against France, 468 ; accepta
alliance with Napoleon, 439 ; arm-
ing ot East Prussia by order of Uia
Czar, 482 ; Treaty of Kaliach with
Itussia, 484 ; the Frenoh Bvacuata
Berlin, 486; war declared against
Fiance, 486 ; national spirit, 487 ;
defeated I^tsen and Bautswi,
493; victories of Qrossbeeren and
Dennewitx, 606 ; results of tha
wars of Napoleon, 640, 642. Csm-
paignotlSIS against Napolaon, ii.
48—66; Treaty of Parisj 60—62;
national disappointment after 1815,
121 ; King Ftederick William pro- .
miaes a popular Constituiioa, 121 ;
Hardonbarg'g syatom, 123 ; Wart-
burg festival, 127; policy of inactioa
(1318], 136 ; Mettemich'siaflnence,
136; n^lntiou to the minor States
of Qennany. 143; redgnalion of
Humboldt owing to Mcttemich's
influence, 148 ; Provincial 'Estates
eatablished (1823), 161; nature of
ita govermnent, 162; view of
Anglo-Itussian Protocol for inter-
vention in Greece, 323 ; condition
after the French Bevolution
of 1830, 406; King Frederick
William still withholds a CMUtilu-
, 406;
406 ; the Zollverein, t6.: undenrtoad-
ing with alliea in Turkish affairs,
460 ; death of Fredandc William
HI., and acceauon of Fredeiioli
William IV. (1840), 407; United
Diet convoked at Berlin, 493.
EvenU in Berlin, Uarob, 1848, iii.
IB, 30, 31; tlie king promisea ■
NatinMl Jmmblr, U; war witb
NepacHnr BcUeawIg.
Uolsluin, iS : uuiirtics of MalmS
vith Deamsrk, 117 : rioU at Berlin
egsinat the Notdon&l Assembly, 119,
1'20; fidelity of the army to the
tlinme, 131 ; tlie Ling appoinlfl
.Count Brandenburg' Minister, 123 ;
poTogAtJon of tbe AHaembljr, 123;
tbs Aasembly refusing to disperse,
■!« driven from their hall by
Oeoeml Wrangd end his troopB,
1S4 i tbe Uiig dissolvee tbe
AiBsmbly and pobliahea « Cunsti-
tution, a, ; attempt to form a
Federation of Uerman States, 139 ;
formatioii ot Federal CoDBtitution
and Federal FarliameDt at Erfurt,
140, 141; conflict with Austria
respecting nffaixs in Hesse CasBel,
145 — 148; seeks the Orar's mediation
respecting affaiia in Uerae, 146 ;
■nunits to Aastria's demands for
diaaolution of Pruaatan union and
witbdiBWal of troops from Uesae,
U7 ; peace with Denmark, HB
policy attheopeoingof tbeCrimam
War. 201— 204; approvea the Four
Points 220 ; aenda pl^nipoten-
tiaries to the Conference at I'aris
(186S), 230 ; Ring Frederick
William IV. withdraws from publio
affair), and his brother, the Crown
Prince William, is appointed
Begent, 300 ; reorganisHtioii of
army by Crown Prince Regent,
310 ; acceamon of the Prinoa Regent
to tbe throne, 311; FarliamBntary
measures of 1S62, 312 ; dissnlution
of Parliament and appointment of
Prince Hohenlohe as Prime Min ister,
S12; conflict between the king and
Parliament on the Army BiU, 313 ;
resignation of Hohenlohe, and
appointmant of Bismarck, 313;
rejection ot anny-danse in the
Budget, 31B ; aunggle between
the Upper House and Lower
Bouse on the Budget, 318; con-
tinoation of tbe gtruwle between
avuiut the Press, 821 ; Bismarck'i
plana rogaiding tiohleswig-Hol
•tain, S4«; Danish War, 350,
•ecura* Sohleewig-Holitein jointly
with Austria by '■
of Tienna, 263 ;
•f Qastein, SiS ;
su;
war with Austria, Ilsnorer,
Suony, and Uusoe-Cassi^l. 370;
defeate Austria at Eeniggiiit^, 376 ;
terms of peace with Austria, 378,
879; Becnit tieatisa with tbe
South Gernisn States, 381; with-
drawal from Luxemburg, 402 ;
the qneatioa of Prince Leo-
pold's election to the Hpaoiali
throne, iii. 416—422 : prepara-
tions for war, 426—427 ; Moltke's
pUns for WOT, 42S ; caoaes of suc-
cess in the war against France,
431 ; Tictoriea over the French at
Weissenburg and Wiirth, 434;
victories ot Spicheren, Man-la-Tour,
and GraTslotte, 436 — 441; sur-
render of the Emperor Napoleon at
Bedon, 440, 447 ; troops invest
Paris, 460 ; capitniation of Metz,
455 ; overthrow of the relieving
armiie, 467^92 : capitulation of
Paris and armistice, 463 ; troop*
enter Paris, 465; treaties of Ver-
salllee and FranMort with France,
tA.; Union of Northern and Southern
States ol Oeroiany. and the title of
Emperor assumed by King William,
406-^68; opening of the first
Parliament of the Empint at Berlin,
468
Fsara, one «f the Mgran Islands, ii.
267 ; destroyed by Egyptians, 304
Pnchner, Austrian commander, leada
troops against Hnngary, iii, 85
Qoatre Bras, Battle of, ii. 61
Baab, surrendered to Anstrians (1849),
iii. 94
Badetsky, Austrian oonuoandBr-in-
chief, carries out fortifications in
Italy, ii. 47G. Fails to suppress
_ 16;
campaign in Northern Italy, 65 ;
re-conquen Venstia, 60 ; at
Hovara, 100
Badicalism, Lord CoaUateagh on, lU
(note)
BadowitiiQenerBl, projector of Gorman
Federal Union, iii. 1 46 ; resignn
ofSoe of ehiet Pmiaian Ujnistar,
147
Baglan, Lord, British commander in
the Crimea, defeats RnsmanB at the
4iffla, iiL^It; b«<iegw Ae Bedan,
MOSBSS BUBOPB.
S23; tliw>rUdItrtb»FraDcli,224;
dotth, 2Zfi
BuDoiino, leads put of Sardiniaa
army againit Austria, iii. 99
Butadt, CoUKTMa of, i. 154 ; murder
of Fceaub eiiTuyi at, ISO. FuU of,
at iiunrreotion ot Joly, 1S10, iii.
138
BatiaboD, Diot of (*m Dietof the Empire]
Bb»j«»i\ FiedmoDteaa UiniKter, iii.
244; aacoeada Oavour aa Prima
Uiuuter, 267 ; naiguB office, 276 ;
oommaota on Qariboldi'a atteinpted
much on Boom, 381
Berhbeig, Oount, Foreipi Hiniator at
Tinna (18M), iiL 349
B«daii, Aaaault on the, iii. 22£
Bedclilte, Lord Btratford de, British
Ambaaaador at Couatikntino^e, iii.
100 ; neKotiaLM with Ptinue
Meoschikoff reapocting Bimiaii
righta in the H0I7 Flaoe^ and
lurldah protectorate over Greek
Chiiatiana, 191 ; oppoaea King of
Proaaia'a proposiLiun reapecUiiK the
righta of the Sulton'l Chriatian
■ubjects, 202
■■ Reflactiona On Frendi BeTalutJon,"
Burke's, i. 63; iii. 438 (note)
KeformatioD, The, in Gennanf, i. 17
Befonn Bill, English, Paaaingof {1832}
u. 4IS, 4:^0
Beggio, portion ol Oiepadana RepuUio
i. 132 ; general aaaemblj of, 134
B«^er, his aecret no^tintions
between the PruNriana and the
Empreaa Eugenie, iii. 454
Bcicbsrath, Thii Austrian, aaaeoible* at
Vienna (1861), iii. 327
BucJistadt, Duke of, eon of Napoleon
BonapaJtu, ii. 401 ; iii. 43
Boichatadt, Ti«aty of (1876), Bussift
and Austria, iii. 488
B^gn of Terror, L 72— 7S ; lb le»«l-
Missolongbi, u. 308, 309 ; takea the
Auropolia of Athens, 311 ; defeated
bf Kuaaiana at Sulewlacha, 341 ;
defeatud by Egyptians at Kooioh,
Beechid Faaba, Turkiah Hiniater;
bia reforma in Turkej, 463; hia
fall, 464
BeTolution, TheFrendi; ita inflnanc«
on Europe, i. 106—109
BarolutioniLry epoch of 1S48, charac-
^od, Bidwp of Fiitda, L IM
Biohelieii, &10 de, Miniatrj ondv
Louis XVIIL, ii. 05 ; tecom-
mended by the Caa to Louia, ii. ;
Amneetv Bill, 101 ; oppomtion to
hia Bullet for pi«viding fundi
from mie ol Chnrch forests, 113;
consents to an """""I grant ta the
Church, 119; at Uia cMtferenca of
Aii-Li-Chapelle, 131 ; viem of tha
meajoroe ?i Deoaies, 154; resigna-
tion, 15S; returns to office, 169;
second retirement, 160
Biego, Spanish coniipiTator, ii. 173 —
175; head ot Liberals at Madrid,
207 ; Preaident of the Cort«a (18£t>,
Bights, The, ot man, i. 68
Kigiiy, Admiral do, iL 32B
Hio Booo, Battle of, i. 3B3
KiToli, Battle of, L 135
Bobeapierre, dub orator, L 8 ; againat
wur, 0 ; accuBod ot ''""'"g at tha
Dictatorship, 66 ; promioont in tha
Boign of Tertor, 72; death, 98
Bodil, Bpauish general, defeats the
force* of the ulurpor Migual, ii
430
Bollin, Ledru, member of French
FrovisioniU GOTamment (1848),
iii. 34; Bepubliuan circular, 37;
Natiooul AsBsmblj oondonaa hia
offences, 38 ; demsjida the impeach-
ment ot the Ministry, 108
Bomogna, uoited to Piedmont und«
Victor Emmanuel, iii. 27S
BomanEoft, Chief T^hm^^h Ministry, i,
480
Bome, French intrigue* in, L 163 ;
entry of French troops, 1S4; con-
stituted a Bepublic, 166 ; spoljation
by the French, 166 ; eviicuatiun by
CVcnch, and entry wt King Kerdia-
and, 172; flight of King Ferdin-
and, and re-entry of French,
173 ; annexed by Najioleon. 436 ;
Oonfersnoe after tho ioaurrection in
Papal States, ii. 403; euthusiiuan
on the publication of amnesty for
political ulfetices by Pius IX., 472.
Mnrder of Rossi, and flight of tha
Pope, iii. 97, 9S ; republic pro-
claioied by Cooatitaent Asaambly,
93; besieged and •.-apturcd by the
French and Kua IX. restoreC 10>
—109; the Motu Proprio, 111;
Maailni'a project for the capturo
of, 287 ; excluded from the new
Italinn kingdom (1861), 298 ; failure
of Garibaldi'i attoiiiiit«d maich 01^
Ml ; Wcndh garriMa vithiliHini,
407 ; entiT of Italian Inraps, 172 ;
bvcomes ths lutlonal capital, ii. ;
"The Frlaonar of the Vatican,"
473 (<»Hf «M Papal Statoa)
Boon, Oeneial, Prusaian MiniBter of
War, iii. 312 ; supports tha "blood
and iron" polloy of Eumarck, 316,
117
Bom, Uartinei de la, Spanish Minis-
Ux, Rives a Constitution to Spain,
iL429
BouBseau'i writingi, i. ST
Hosbi, Pellegriro, Hnxder o£, iii. »7
Boatopchin, Count, fires Moeoow, L
46S
Roteamunatcr, Ablteas o^ i, 18
Bothi^ I^, Bnttle of, i. 522
Bouen, occupied bv tbs ProBuans, iii.
469
BoDber, M., French Miuistor, iii. 40S
fioumania, iL 250 ; Charles of Eoben-
zollBm, elecloil Hereditnry Prince,
237 ; allied -nith Rowia in the var
against Turkey, 497 ; independence
recognised by the Treaties of San
* Stefano and Berlin, &10— fil6
Bousain, Admiral, French AmbaBS&dor
at Constantinople, iL 44S
Rnffo, Cardinal, L 182
Biigi^n, Landing ol British troopa at,
1. 350
BnnBell, Earl, iii. 191 ; views on Italian
affairs, 272 ; propoanl respecting
Schleswifc-UolBtein at the Confer-
ence of London (1864), 362; atti-
tude during the Daniah War, 35fi
fioBria, partitions Polttod, i. B3, 97;
death of Catherine and accession of
Paul, 168 ; coalittoa with England,
Turkiiy. and Naples, agninat t'Tonce,
169; advance of troops against the
French, 177 ; army arrives in
Lomburdy, 181 ; victories ovcv the
Fnnoh, 181, 182, 191 ; jealousy
towards Austria, 192 (nott); end of
alliance with Austria, 1S6 ; Anglo-
Bussian pipedition against Holland,
195 — 197 1 peace with France, 227 ;
joiuB the Northern Maritime
League, 228 ; secret treaty with
lYanco (1801), aSO; joins England
In a coalition against France, 278 ;
boopa enter Bavaria, 292; defeated
hj die French at Aaaterlitz, 206 ;
IrOnhril's negotiations for the
eMffion of Sicily to Joseph Bona.
narte, SIS ; entry of Napolton into
Tbland, 340; continnation of war
With FrsAoe, 840—312 j trea^ of
Z. 168
Baitenstra'n, 344 ; dafsated by the
French at Fiiodland, 345 ; trea-
ties of Tilsit, 347; rapture of
friendly relations with France, 442;
declines to send troops into Prussia
against France, 4uH ; invasion by
Hapoleon, 4ca— 177 ; Iroiity of
Kolischwith trus8iB,4S4; Cuesocb*
alter Berlin, 4H5 ; campaigns of
1H13 and 1814, 162— £20. Its
gains hy the settlements 1814, ii.
1 ; second Treaty of Paris, 60—62 ;
the Cxor's Treaty of Holy AUionca,
63 ; the Caar restores the King-
dom of PoUod, 80 ; intdvention
in Turkey, 277 ; project of joint
intervention in Grcoco, 313; dis-
content and coDfmiraciiHi, 316 ; dmth
of Alexander I., 317; military
insurrectional St. Petertburg,319;
the Orond Dukes Couslantine and
Nicholas, ii. ; Nii^olas Emperor,
ii.; protocalwithEnj,-land,32l; tukea
part at Navarinn, 330—332; war
with Turkey. 335— 3i3 ; peacii of
AdrianopIe,343 ; invasion of Poland,
ass : capture of Warsaw, 397 ;
intervention in Turkey during war
with E(fyptlana, 446; Treaty of
TJnkiar Skelessi with Turkey, 447;
joins in Quadruple Treaty and de-
GlurationastuDardanelles,4 56 — 4 62;
intervention against Hungary
[1849], iii. 93; dispute with France
respoctinif Holy Places in Palestiue,
185 ; claims in Turkey, 188; tro<ips
enter Moldavia and Wullachin, 192 ;
rejects amended Vienna note, 195 ;
outbi'uak of bostilitics with Turkey,
197; recall of ambasHadori from
London and Paris, 190 ; wu
declared by England and France,
ii. ; evacoaticn of Danubiao
Provinces, 208 ; defeat at the
battle of the Alma, 211 ;
Battle of Balaclava, 215; defeat
at Inkermann, 217; foil of Sebus-
topol, 226 ; losses in the Crimea,
227; capture of Kan, it.; treaty
of peace with Great Britain and
AlLes signed at Paris (1856), 230;
regains -right of having war-ships
and arsenals in Black Boa (tS71),
240 : proposes a Congress to discuas
Italian afbira, 2G6 ; opposition to
Viator Bmrnanuel's assumption of
the title of King of Italy, 299 ; con-
dition under Alexander II., 329;
liberation of ths serfs, 330 ; oonces-
nons of the Cm in Poland insu^
KOCXKir xuBors.
ciMlt to prsTent national inninec-
tioii,334;thHCza[miikeBtho|joiiaints
in PolHod lajid-prDiirietoi's, 330^ pro-
poneiConfaraDoe ol London on Luz-
embuT)^ question, 4 04; freed from the
ol>li)«)ition8 of the tnuty (Bkuk Sen)
of 18ie Kt tho close of tha Fraoco-
PraMiao War, 473; "League, of
the three Emperors," 476 ; tnwty
with AuBtn& at Keichstadt on
Eaitent QueBtloD, 438 ; enforces
SerTian armistice, 4B9: conferenoe
of Constantinople, 493; ths" London
Protocol," 49B ; decUreswar against
Turkey, 497 : advancn on the
Balkans, and three battloa of
Plevna, 49B— 601 ; fall of Plevna,
SOS 1 capitulation of Shipka, and
entiy of troops into Adrianoplo,
604, 606; armistice, 606; Immi-
nence of war with England, 609 ;
tieiity of San Btefano, 610; serret
agreement with England, 617 ;
Congrea of Berlin, 613
Eostchuk, iH. 498, 499
Baalfeld, Defeat of the Frussiani bjr
Napoleon at, i. 327
BB&rbriicken, iii. 433, 436
Snlamanca, Battle of, i. 440
Balemo, iii. 292
SaLshorr, Lord, represents England at
the Constantinopla Conference, iii.
4S1 ; BQcieeda Lord Dovby as
Foreign Minister, 614 ; circuUir to
the Powers on thi. Treaty of &in
gtefano, 615; represents England,
with Xxird Beaconsfield, at the
Congress of Berlin, 617; on the
relations of Biissia and Turkey, 619
Salonika, Hurder of Prussian and
French consuls at, iii. 4S0
flaliburg, Biahoprio of, i, 149; ceded
to Buvaiia, 430. Won by Austria,
ii. 4
Btunbre, Biver, battles between French
tuid allied Forces of England and
ADBtria,L 91
Samoa, ii. 288
San ij[«fano, Trea^ of, iii. 610
Sand, Carl, aseasain of Kotzebue, Ii.
141
Saiagoeaa, i. 396; siege of, 399
Sardinia, war against France, i. 64 ;
army joint Anstriana in Italy
against France, 113 ; Brmistice and
peace with French, IIS, Declines
allmnca with Austria, ii. 86. War
wi'.h Austria, iiL 66 ; total defeat
■t NovaM, 100 ; Uw King abdi-
catea and retirca to Optvto, when
he diea, lot ; accession of Victor
Emmanuel, IDZ ; troops sont to the
Crimea, 223; defeats Uusaiana at
the Tchemaya, 326; Coant CUTOUT,
l>rim« Uiniiter, 244 ; rupture
with Auatria, 361 ; declares war, in
ciinjuDction with France, agunst
AuHlria. 259 ; victoKea of Uagenta
and Solterino, 261, 363 ; peais with
Austria concluded at ViUafranca,
8G6; union with Central Italy.2T7;
Garibaldi conquers Sicily and
Naplea in the name of Victor
Emmannel, 285, 293 {and mm
Italy, Piedmont)
Savary, French general, brings tho
King of Spain to Bayonna, i. 376
Bavtet Faaha, Turkiah Foreign
Minister, presides at the Constan-
tinople Conference (1876), iiL 494
" Saviour of Society " (Louis Napo-
loonl, iii. 164, 177
Savoy, i. SO ; annexed to France, 6t ;
part of, left to Franco [1314), 636 ;
but taken away (1S15), ii. 62.
Bevolntionary movement of 1834,
headed by MaxEini, ii. 413; Charles
Albert of Carignano ascends the
throne, 470. Annexed to France,
iii. 277 ; effect of annexation «•
Enroptv 270 ; power of the Papacy
in,3B0
Saiony, Weakneea of (1792), i. 16;
Kinp: of, acquires from Napoleon
t)ie Gmnd Duchy of Wamaw, 347.
The Ciar proposes its anneiatim
to Prussia at Oongrees of Vienna,
ii. 24, 26 ; the King restored to the
throne, 30 ; Constitution, 408. In-
surrection, iiL 136 ; attempt to
form a union with Prugmu, 139;
secedes from League with Prussia,
140 ; Dresden occupied by Prussians,
374; included in afedorationnndei
PruBSian leailerahip, 378
Scarlett, Qeneral, commands t&e Heavy
Brigade at Balaclava, iii. 216
Bchamhorst, pinsident of
363;
refonns, 406 ; resigns ofBoe, 450
Schelde, River, i. 66.
Biherer, French general, L ITS.
Boliill, Prueaian officer, gallant defence
of Colberg against the Frenob, i.
842; leada the rising against the
French in Northern Qermany, 417 ;
heroic death, 419
Sohiller, his ocoineatioa with the %«nd
SukBolWeiiMi, iLiae
Oarman thsologitn, I.
407
8chl«Bwig-HolBtaii, rebellagwiutDeii-
mmrk, Ui.2&, 117 ; end of lebellion
and onion with Denmark, 160;
Fiinoe CSCTUtiaii declared heir to
the thione, ii. ; Dnke of Aognaton-
barg Tenouncaa his pretmBioni to
the tlinme, 343 ; King Fredarick
aiclddea EoUtein from the new
CooBtitution, S44 ; Fnuai& sup-
porta Sohleawig sffainat Ben^
"""■^1 344 ; England recommenda
■epatata legulatnro, ib. ; "King
Frederick's maniFesto declares
Bchleewig- incorpoiBted with Den-
mark, 346 ; Christian IX. supports
his predooessor'i policy, 545 ; Saxon
and HanoTorian troops enter Hoi'
stein, 31B ; Uismarck'a plana, 347 ;
Anstrian and Pnisaian troopt enter
Sohleswig, 360 ; armistice and
Conference of London, 36 1 ; con-
tinnatian of the war, and failure of
Danmaik to enforce Its .demanda,
3SZ; enmDder of the Duchieeto
Austria and Prusaia by the Treaty
of Vienna, ii. ; Bismarck pro-
poaea oonditianslly that the crown
abonld he conferred upon the Prince
of Augiutenburg, 357 : annexed to
PruBsia, 379
Schlick, Auatrian general, defeated by
Huni^arianB, iil. 87
tJcbmaiz, his pamphlet againtt Prus-
sian Liberals, ii. 124
Sohmerling, leader of Qerman Assem-
blr, ii'i. 118; reHigna office, 126;
called to office by the Emperor
Fnmdi JoMmh L, 326 ; roaignution,
387
Schanbnmn, Treaty of, i. 298
SchonTaloff, Count, Rusaian Ambassa-
dor at London, iii. 496, 607, 616
Schwaraonberg, Auatrian commander
in Russia, i. 462 ; conimande army
of Bohemia against Napoleon, 602,
e06, 613, 621
tichwaixenberg, Felix, ohisf Austrian
HiDi8teT(lS4a],iy.80; depoees the
Bmperor, 81; publieheB a Constitu-
tion, 88 ; design regarding Lom-
bardy, 97; plan for centralisation
of Government in Austria, 126;
aeeke to provoke a quarrel with
Prussia, 144 ; Prussia submits to
his demands for dissolution of
PniBsian Uniao, and the reco|;iii-
tion of the Diet of Frankfort, 147 ;
4aspotio polii^, 163 ; death, 151
Solnrflidniti, Tomott at, BL 130
Bebast^pol, ii. 447; iii. 107; forUflca-
cations of, 210; bombardmant of,
214 ; progress of the siege of, 223 ;
fall of, 226 ; restoration of Rnsaian
power by tbe revision ot the Treaty
of Paris (1871), 240
Sebaatiani, bis report upon Egypt, i.
267. French Foreign Uinistw
(1831), ii. 402
Sudan, Battle and oapitnlatloii ot, iii
448
Senate of France (1709), i. 206
Serbs, The, of Bonthem Hungary,
revolt in 1848, iii. 63, 64, 66; ds^
feat Hungarians at Ckulowits, S8
Serfage, Abolition of, in Austria, i.
22; in Buchy of Waiaaw, 368;
in Pmasia, ib. In Hnssjit, iii. 330
Serria expels Turkiab garrisonB, iii.
288 ; supporls the revolt ot Herze-
govina, 477 ; declares war against
Turke}', 482; defuutod by Turks,
489 ; indi^ndenoe recognised by
the Treaties of San Stetano and
Berlin, 610
Seville taken by the French, L 446 ;
ii.219
Seymour, Sir Hamilton, British Am-
bassador at St. Pt-torsburft, iii. I8T
Shipka Pass, BatUe of, iiL 500;
c&pitnlHtion of, 604
Sicily, condition of in righteenth
century, i. 116 ; Bonaparte demands
its cession to his brother Joseph,
SI 5. Under Ferdinand of Knples,
ii. 86; BiitUh influence, SB; slate
of, in 1821, 201 ; revcIoUon at
Palermo, 474; conquered by Ferdi-
noud of Naples, 112; Garibaldi
B Palom
dictnloiEhip of the island, 2S5, 286 ;
Garibaldi's difficulties in larrying
on the government, 2BB ; desires
annexation to the kingdom of
Victor Emmanuel, 295
Si£y^ Abbe, i. 199, 20), 204
Silesia. Loxs of, by Austria, i. 21
Silistria. Siege of, iii. 207
Simon, at., ijodalistic writinge, ii. ii09
Simpson, QenersI, eucceods Iiord lle^-
lan as English commander in the
Crimea, iii. 226
Simson, Dr., President of the Frank-
fort National Aasembly, offers the
Imperial Crown to King Frederick
WiUiam. iii. 133 ; spokoamon at
VeiB^iillos, 468
Sinope. Turkish squadron destroyed hj
■ fiuesis at. ii
i97
MODERtr BVSOFS.
flkoMall, OMunl, at the b«ttlM of
Flenu, iii. SOI
BUtbit, kboluhed b^ England (I83S),
BI«*»-tn<de, prohibited by Engbni)
{18071, ii. 71; Fmnca nnitei with
England hj the trMtjr of Faris for
ita luppreaiion, i. GST. England
|BOpOBea it* aniTanHLl abolition at
the Congraea of Vitnna, ii. 71;
Sweden and Holland prohibit it,
til ; Spain refuua any rwtriFUon,
76 ; aboiilfaed by Napoleon, ii.
Slan of HuDgary, ii. 478 ; national
nMtTement8(I830— I843J, IBS, 187;
iii. 70, 3H
Smith, Sir Sidney, English ftdminl,2Sl
SmolmBko, rarrendered to Napoleon by
the Bnaiiana, L 167 ; en^ of the
French on the retreat from Moscow,
471
SoUermo, Battle of, iii 363
SophitH iii. GOl
Bonlt, Freoch f;eneral, i. S94, 397 ; in-
Tadea Portugal, 101 ; captuiea
Sevillfl, and Liyi aicf^e to Oulii,
416 ; in the Fyi«iiee«, »20, SeTves
nnder Loail XVin., ii. 18
Spain, allied with England againat
Fnuioe, L 69 ; oodea to France a
wwtioii of St. Domingo, B6 ; fleet
bMlon by English oS St. Tincont,
lei ; treaty oE Fontaineblean, 3S6 ;
under Charlea IV., 367; diiastroiia
influ«noe of Qodoy, 367; deaignaof
Napoleon, 368 ; loM of Bneno*
Aym, 360 ; friendly entry of tho
Franoh, 372 ; hatred towards Oodoy
and the Que
372;
□try of
General Munt, 373 ; abdicatioi
Ohariee IT., and aooeawon ol
Fndinand, 371; ChailM and
Ferdinand lairsnder their Ti^la
to Napoleon at Bayonne, S77;
nationiU aiorit, S77 ; rising of
th» people agunat the £Vench,
S7S ; Jea^h B«nuHiarteinada King,
381; Spaaiarda defeaiad at Bto
Beoo, SSS 1 vietorjr of Baylen, 384 ;
NapolMn'a oampugn, 8M; Battlo
(rfOonuina,SH; ■agaofSaiagoeaa,
400) famded I7 Wellington;
TalaTera. 444; Tictoriea of
Haivhal Soolt, 446 ; campaigna of
1810, 1811, 447— MS; WdlmgtoE
•nten Madrid, but retreats, 449;
attack of the liberal! on despotimn,
411; Uw Jwta resipu ila fowen
into the hands of a Bogancy, 401 ;
Conatitutloo made by the Cortea,
4G3; antsgooism of the clergy far
the Cortes, 461 ; campaign of 1818,
Tittoria, fi20. Baitoration of
Ferdinand, ii. B ; power of tha
clergy, 1 1 ; decline of oommenia
and agrioaltni*, 12; leluses to
accept any restriction regarding
the slaTe-trade, 76, 76 ; action of
England in 1816 under Lord
Caatlereagh regwdinK Uio Oon-
stitution, 89 ; condition between
1814—1820, 168—177-; abira
betwBML 1820—1822, 207-209 ;
Einf F^dioAnd oonspiree ^tg*-inj^
the Conatitation, ii. ; Uie Er^tadoa
and ServUes, 207, 308 ; dvil war,
209; Congress of Vtamui, 215-
317; invasion of the French, 219;
appointment of a Begency, 230 ;
6ieg« of Chdia, 333 ; ike Constitn-
tion abrogated, U, ; clergy placed
in oSIce, 223 ; reign of terror, 224 ;
England prohibits the conqneat of
Spamsh colonies by Fntnce .:r
Allies, 21j— 227; death of King
Ferdinand, 427, 429; repeals Salio
lav, and appoints his daaghtar
Issbella to snoceed him under the
Begency of the Queen, 429 ; Don
OarloB claims the crown, and heads
a rebellion, ii. ; Martinei de la
B«aa gins a Conatitntion, it. ; Don
Carka defcsled and nnnovad to
London, 430 ; Don Carlos re.
appears in, at head of insuigenla
(1831), 131 ; Tictoriaa of Carlist^
431; defeat of General Valdea,
436: appeal to SVanca for asBstanos
which IB nfosed, 436 — (87; toIdii-
teers in Englaml and Viaiu» en-
rolled, commanded by Oolond Da
r Oariiats bf
QeuoaE Esparteia, and end of
Oariiri: war (1839), 441; Qoeai
Qmstina raigns the Regency, and
ia neceeded by Qeneral Espartan^
ii. ; exile ol Eapu-tero, 442 ;
Friooess tsabella made Qaeen,
ii. ; Hareiagea of the Queen to
Don Vtaxtdmso and of the In<
fanta to the Duke of Uontpensier,
SOS. BaTDlntion of ISftB, iU. 413 ;
candidatnra of Fiince Leopold for
the throne opposed by Fmncc^ 411
—416
Spandao, Pmssan fortress, sum*-
4<ndfa>l)MEVaock,iS»|
^lelia, DIM of uw .£geaik lalonda, ii.
S87
Sphfttteria, iRlaod of, ii. 306
Spicheren, Battle of, between French
and Pruasiun^ iiJ. 43S
Bpiiea, ca^ured by French, i. 63
Stadion, Count, Aiutrun Miniitar, i.
403 ; ietii«fl from public afhirs, 129
Btad, Hme. de, 1 211
Stein, Ritter vom, i. 2fiS; his ex-
ponire of the character of King
Frederick WHliam's advisera, 318 ;
Appeals to PruBsiun pntriotiain, 336
(and note); chief MioiHter, 367;
edict tor the abohtion of eerlags,
35B ; reurganisatiaa of army, 362;
political refonns, 365 ; attompta
to nc|tuti&te vith Napoleon fur
the ITrench eracnation of Fruiaia,
388 ; entoaragM a popuLir in-
mrrrection, 389 ; rengiiB office,
361; outlawed by Napoleon, 302;
■dTJaer of the Emperor of KuBsia,
480; his conunuaion from ths
Cmr to East Prumio, 481; ar-
nngea treaty of EaliBch, 484 ;
policy during War of Liberation,
608. I'micnt at the Cocgresa of
Vienna, ii. ZO, 26 ; on the terma of
WMud Treaty of Paris, SI ; with-
drawal from OODgresa at Vienna,
L433
Btettin, Pniatiiui fortreei, nnendered
to the French, i. 333
Stewart, Sir Charlie, L fi36
BhK'laich, Battle of, i. 179
Stonrdm, hia pampblet on Qerman re-
volutionaiy Diovements, ii 138
StralBimd, Capitulation of, to the
French, i. 360; tiikon by Schill,
and afterwards by Napoleon, 419
fitiangf ord, Lord, Eagliiih Ambiissiidor
at Conetantinople, ii. 27S, 2T8
fitiaabnrg, aipectod Boyuliet moTo-
meot at, L 87. Concentration of
boopsat(tR70), iiL428;cHpitulat««
to the Pruaaiana, 463
BtnitiaiiroTk, leader of the Serba, iii.
89
■troKoiioff, RoBiian Ambasaador at
(Stnatantinople, ii. 276
Btnttgart, Kemnant at German Na-
tional Aiaenibly meets at, but ex-
pelled ina few days by the Govern-
ment, ill. 137
9«bsid^ of England to Fnisaia, i. SS ;
a. 587
l^li to Micomjtliih intended result,
93; to Anstna, 97, 223; syatem
of, 343
Boleiman Pasha, iii. GOl, 603, 506
Suliotes, Ilie, iL 264, 296
SuTaro^ Russian general, i. 177; cam-
paign in Lombardy, lSl;diHBenBiuas
«i[^ Austrian Ooveimneot, IS8 ;
notoriea over the French, 191 ; re-
treats serosa the Alps, 194
Sweden, joins the Northern Maritdme
League, i. 238; unites with Eng-
land a^iiMt Fiance, 378 ; joins in
thetreatyof Bartenatein,il44. Pro-
hibits the slave-trade, S. 76
Switzerland, French intarrentitai, J.
169; war with France, 161; the
Helvetio Bepublic, 162; movMuents
of French troops, 178; Russian
campaign, 191; civil war, and
Bonaparte's intervention, 246 ;
declared independent by the treaty
of Paris, 636. DIsperaion ot
revolutionary leaders by order ot
European Powers, ii. 414
Syria, conquered by Egyptians luder
tbiahim, ii. 443 ; given to Viceroy
of Egypt, 44S ; expulsion of Ibr*>
him by European allies, 460. Occu-
pied }^ the French, iii. 238
Bzechonyi, Count, his refonns in Hun-
gary, ii. 481 : alarmed at Koasuth't
liberalism, 464
Talavem, Battle o^ L 4:
rand, Bonaparte's
support of Italy,
jlond on the rejection of Bona-
parte's peace proposal, 217 ; drawa
np Italian Constitution, 244 ; his
work in the settlement of Qermiinv,
248 ; at Erfurt, 391 ; acU with
Alciandar on dethronement of
Napoleon, G31. Sepresents Franca
at the Congreu of Vienna, ii. 20 — 30;
united to Fouch£ in offioe under
Louis XVIII., 61 ; faU of his
Ministry in 1815, 95 : intrigues on
behalf ot Louia Philippe. 363 ;
Ambassador to Londou, 385 ; per-
suadeH William IV.and Wellington
to abstain from intervention in
Bel^oo uSairH, 386
Tann, Prussian Qeneral, tabea Orleans,
iii. 463; driven from Orieana, 457
Tatiatchatf, Oenoral, Hussian Ambas-
sador at Madrid, ii. 81
TDhemaieff, General, leads Buasiaii
tioops in Servia, iii, iS9
MOSBSS roxopa.
TohanBjm, Valkr of tlu, IB. 31S, IIT ;
iMtttla cf Um, 326
in
Tiumtlj, 0. S64, 366, iil. 619
Thim, U, «dttor of tha XaHenal,
pnbUdiM ■ protest againat Oa
■diola <rf Oiarlea X, li. HV ; oppoaw
inaaiiectioii id Psria, 970 ; adTancM
th* MOM of the Duke of Orleana,
>7S ; premier, varlilco policy on the
Eaatom Qoeation, 46S ; ttmgtutiau,
460. UU hiatory of Napoleon, iii.
44; arraated by Looia Napoleon,
173 1 denouQcea Blamarck'a aggroa-
nona, 404 ; argumenU af;aiiiet war
with FnuaU, 421; move* Oke
fannatioii of a Oomoiittee of
Guvcrnmunt on the Burrander of
Napataoii at Sedan, 448^ elected
Fiuxident by the National Aaaembty
at Bordeaux, and Hiranj^et teima
of peace At Voreailloa with Biamorok,
4M ; efiorta to save Mate, 466 ; the
Tremit Bepublio under hia I'mai-
Thonuu, Qenetal Climen^ murdered by
NaUonal Quards of Parii, iii 470
Thourenel, M., French Foreign
Miniater, iiL 274
niDgiit (Anttrian Hinister} ; character,
and aaropcui opinion of him, i. 81
(imdnote); projects of Hnneintion,
Sb ; on the disorder in the Austriiin
arm)', 91; his war policy oppoaod,
129 (and note), 138; detenninea to
renew the war with Fiance, 169 ;
disagrees with Russian oommander,
Suvaroff, 188 i design to budgz
Piedmcmt to Austria, IBO (and
note) ; on the Emperor's secret
orniistiDe with Prance, 223 (and
nata] ; resigns oQicu, and re-
appointed, 224 1 dismissed from
puwor, 225 i his advice sought by
Uie Emperor after Wagnun, 430
Timova, iii. 499
Todleben, Rossian general In the
&imca, iii. 212, 213; placed at tha
head ol the army betora PlevnH, S02
Toreno ancceuds Vuldes aa Bpunish
War Uinister, ii. 438
Totrea Vedras^ Unea of, i. 444
Tory Party, i. 82
Toulon in revolt^ L 76; sarrender to
Knijublif, 82
TouiB, seiflnd Hoat of French Govom-
ment at the commencement of the
tie^e of Piui^ iii. 451
Timtalgar, Battle of, L 3M
TranaylTania, i. 25. A^tatiiai lor
Conititational rigfafas, ii. 483. Aa
Boumaiuwi moTsmant in, m. W;
Russian* enter, 89
Treaty, Westphalia (1643), L IT ; for
the partition of FuUnd, between
■ Empreas CaUierine ud King
FnuiM and Prussia (1796), 128 ;
Tolentino, France and Pope, 136 ;
Leoben (1797), Francs and Aurtria,
138 ; Campo Fonaia {1797), Fran<:e
and AuBlxia, 147 ; Liui£Tille[180I),
Fnuice and Austria, 226 ; *■""■■"
(18D2). Franoa and Oniat Britain,
238; Potsdam (1805), Pnuui and
Kuaaia, 292; SchonfininD (1805),
Pruann and Fnuoe, 298; Frea-
burg (1805), Fiwice and Austria,
299; Bartfnstain (1807), Ruaaia,
Pruwi;!, Kngland, and 8*eden,
344 ; TiUit (1807), Franca, Basaka,
and Prnaeia, 347; Foutainablma
(1807), France and Spain, 365;
Vienna (1809), France and
AuaUia, 430 ; Ealirch (18131,
Pnusia and Rusaia, 484 ; Bsidipii-
iMi'h (1813), Austria, Rusbia,
Hiid Pmoia, 499 ; Teplita (1813),
Russia, Prussia, and Austiia, 611 ;
liied (1813), Bavaria and the
Alliea during the War of Idbeia-
tion, 511: Paris (1814), France
and the AUiee, 536, 537. (Secret)
at CangT«ss of Vionn!i (1816),
France, England, and Aualna
a^Linst Rusda and Prusaia, iL
28 ; TParis (second) (18!'".), 63; Holy
Alliance (1815) ; Ituwia and the
Powers, 63; London (1827), Eng-
land, Kussia, and France, 324 ;
RuNSia and Turkey iit Akerman
(1820), 335; Adiianople (1828),
Russia and Turkey, 343 ; London
(1834), tipain, Portugsj, Eng-
land, and France, (or the eipulsion
of Don Carlos and l)t>u M igur! from
la aod Turkey,
Commercial, England and
Turkey (1838), 463; En^bnd,
Russia, AnstHa, and Pmssia on
the Eastoni Question (1840), 466.
Paris (1866), Riiesia, (Jrent Britain,
and Allies, iii. 230 ; (Scicret) France
end SardiniH (1859), 256; Ziini^
(1859), AuBtiia, Fnnoe, and ^.
Aostria, aiiil FrusaU, 3S3; Prague
(1866), Fruuia sod Austria, 370;
Loadou (1867) on Uie Loiembiuv
Queetion, 402 ; TeraaiUes and
Frankfort [1S71), PnuBia and
Pnnce, 165; Keichatadt (1B76),
Roraia and Atutria, 488 ; 8an
Htefano (1878), Russia and Turkey,
610 ; Berlin (1818), general, 218
Trabbia, BatUe of the, i. 182, 186
TrtvB^ Elector of, proteclB Freooh
emigrantB, i. 10; emigiants ex-
pelled from, 10 ) condiLiun in 1792,
37
Tribunal, lieTolatioiiary, L 74
Tribnuate (France), i. 20S, 2S9
'I'rinidad, i. 238
Tripolit^ centre of TurlHah GoTeni'
ment in the Marea, ii. 288 ; Cftptnre
of, b]r Greek ioBurgenlc, and maa-
ncTS ot iohabitants, 291; burned
bT Ibrahim, 347
Trocho, Qeiieral, bead of the QOTOm-
ment of National Defence in Farii,
iii448
Troppau, Couforence of, ii. 193
I'ngendbnnd, Oerman Society, i. 407.
bj Bchmalz, ii. 124;
140
ToilerieB, Lomi XVT. confined at
(1791), i. 4 ; attacked by mob, 42 ;
Mtabked bj Royalists. 102; sur-
rounded by Augereau's troops for
the seisnre of the oppoeition eection
in the Directory, 146. Flight o(
Louis XVIII., ii. 38; devastated
br the mob (1848), 513. Louis
Napoleon takes poKicssion of, iii.
177
Tartn, entry of Rnaaian troops, i. 187.
Government comaiences ecclo-
siaatical reform, iii. 243 ; with-
drawal ot French AmbasBador on
the Invasion of the Papal States by
the Fiedmonteee, 293
Torkey, declaration of war against
French Bepublic, i. 169 ; joins the
coalitim against France, ii. ; de-
feated by f^nce at Heliopolis, 234.
Deeigns of Anstria and Russia, ii.
3Sfi ; supremacy in oertain districts
«f Qreece, 348 ; rerenes in Oreeo^
2SI, 270 ; dtif an out of the Morea,
274; manacre ot Christians at
Oonslantiiiople, 276, 276; Austrian
policy, 379; attitude of England,
S81 ; fall of Tripolitzs, 290 ;
■BMocn of Chioa, 201; doobla
t. S60
inTarim of On«(w, 295 — 298;
defeated by Greeks, 290; siege of
Hiasolonghi, 309 — 311 ; refuses
anniatice proposed by Allies, 320 ;
defeated by Allies at Navanno,
330—332 ; Sultan's manifesto, 335 ;
war with Russia, 836—343 ; peace
of Adrianople, 343 ; war with
Hehemet Aii, 412—446; peace of
Kutaya, 446 ; Treaty of Unkiar
Skelosei with Russia, 449 ; second
war «ith Mebemet All, 453 ; death
ot Mshmud II„ 464 ; accession of
Abdul Medjid, 4S4 ; Admiral
Achmet Fewzi hands over Turkish
fleet to Mehemet All, U. ; joint
action with Allies against Uehemet
Ali, and Ibrahim, 4S0, 460; here-
ditary government of Egypt con-
ferred on Mehemet Ali and family,
461 ; mfomiB of Reschid Pasha,
463 ; talll of Reschid, 464. Hie
Czar visits England respecting
Turkish affairs, and speaks <n
Turkey "as a sick, a dying
man," iii. 182; protects Koaauth
and other Hungarian leaders, 184 ;
dispute 'with Russia respecting
Holy Places in Palestine, and pro-
tection of Greek Christians, 185^
180 1 rejects the Vienna Note, 105 ;
outbreak of hostilities with Russia,
197 ; defeats Russians at Oltenitza,
107; squadrondestroyed by Russia
atSinope, i*. ; Crimean War, 210—
226; fall of Ears, 237; Treaty of
Paris, 230 ; engagements mode with
regard to the protection of Chris-
tians, 231 (and note) ; hollow and
fictitious character of Treaty of
Paris, 234 ; discord through-
out the Empire, 238; revolt of
Heraegovina, 477 ; presents tion
of the Andrasay Note at Con-
stantinople demanding certain
reforms, 478 ; mnrder of Prusuao
and French Consuls at ^onika,
479 ; the Berlin Memorandum, 4S0 ;
deposition and murder of Sultan
Abdul Aziz, 482 ; asaassination of
Hussein Avni, ii. ; accession of
Murad v., it.; war declared by
Servia and MOutonegro, it. ; 5or-
vian defeats and armistice, 189;
Constitation, 403; Constiintinople
Conference, 493; rejects the pro-
posals of the Powers fur an Inter-
national Commission, 49'i , rejects
the London Pmtoool, 497; Russia
doduea war; tS~
m
noDsnir svnoFS.
Bnlguu, 4BT— £02 : &U of Plema,
capitnlBtion of Shipka, and enby of
Boatful troopB into Adrionople,
503—606; tha Saltan appealg to
Qnesii Victoria, fi05 ; Treaty of B«n
Stefono, 610 ; oedea Cypnu to
X!ng1and., and undertalies to protect
ChriitiBii sabjecta in Asia, 617:
modificatioii* of the Treaty of 5mi
StefsDO at the Con^reu ol Berlm,
21S, 219
^Bcany, Hole of Leopold II- in, i.
26; allied with Eagland againBb
f^nct^ 69 ; Mate of. in eighteenth
century. 116; given to Prince of
Parma bj Biniaparte, 246, Eventa
in 1848, iii. 18, 97; fiight and re-
atoratioD of the Qrsnd Duke, 88,
103; final flight of thoOrand Duke,
2SI ; dictatorship offered to Victor
Emmanuel, ii. ; imited to Pied-
mont under Victor Emmanuel, 276
Tyrol, The, ceded to Bavaria bj
Anatria, i. 300 ; liaing against the
Fieoch (1609), 410 ; trmtment by
the £mperor of Austria, 433 ; «xo-
ontion of Hofer by Napoleon, 436
Ulm, i. 288 _
nitremoDtaniran, i. 263 ; nireada in
Austria, iii. IBS; opposition of, to
Victor Emmannel'a roforma, 244 ;
power in Bavaria, 411
UuiLria, iii. 282 ; entry of Fiedmonteae
troops, 203
DnivetBilius. conaiderad byMettemlcli
to be dangerous to European peace,
ii. 137 ; placed under police aupor-
▼iaion in Oennany (IS32), 411.
Influence and agitiition of tlie
(tudenta of Viennu (1848), iii. 60,
61
Taldoa, Spanish War Miniater, tnket
the field againat Carlists and BuSera
minoua defeat, ii. 436 ; retirement,
438
Valencia, Ferdinanil of Spain's mani-
festo at, ii. 10
Valencienuea, Siege nf, i. TO ; capitn-
latee to Duke of York, 76
VsUadolid, i. 398
Vahny, Battle of, L 47
Vandamme, Frencli QeneraL i. 6D6,
606
Varna, aunendered to Bussiana. ii, 340
Vaablano, H,, French Minister, intro-
duces the Electoral Bill (1816), ii
Tenaisnn, Qlaima of the t*
Venioe, fionaparte'a daaigni on, L 121 ;
French troopa, U. ; otCer«d 1^
Bonaparte to Anatria, 141 ; be>
cornea the property of Anatria
by tha Treaty ol Oampo Fonnio,
147 ; ceded to France, 300.
Won by Austria (1814), ii.«; under
Austrian rule, 83. Insunectioa
{1S48], liL IS : excludnd from ths
nev Italian kingdom (1861), 298;
unil«d with Italy (1866), 386
Tergniaud, Girondin memb^ of L^i>-
lative Assembly, i. 0
Verona, Congrem of, ii. 216—217
Veraaillw, ilL 460, 463, 464 ; Treaty of,
406; King WUliam takes the
tlUe of Gsnnan Emperovat,168;
headquartera of French Govern-
ment troopa daring the inaurrection
_ ofthe Parifl Commune, 470
Vioenxa, capitulatee to Austria, iiL 80
Vintor, French general, i. 426, 474
'^itor Emmanuel, lueceeda his father
Charles Albert, as King of Sardinia,
iii. 101, 102 ; chnracter, and work
on behalf o( Italian freedom, 241,
242; offered the Dictatoralup of
Tuscany, 261 ; appoints com-
misaioncrs to eurol troops in Italy
against Anatria, 282 ; courage Bt
battle of Solferino, 263; accepts
the sovereignty of Tnacany, Parma,
Modena, and the Bomagna, 277 ;
threatened breach with Qstribaldi
with regard to the propoaed invasion
□f Kome, 206; all Italy excepting
Borne and Venetia united nnder hia
•overeignty (1861), 298 ; allied wiih
Prussia in war against Austi-ui
(1866), S77; gains VeneIJa, 386; Na-
poleon's proposed defensive atliaiicfl
against Frusaia, 409 ; gains Borne,
472
Vienna, occupied by the French, i.
293 ; second occnpotion by tba
French. 410; peaoe of. 430; c«a-
ference of Ministers, 146 ; popn-
lar diacoDtentin 1846, 496. Riot*
of 184S, iii. SI ; flight of the Em-
peror Ferdinand, i 63; tumult
(October) and murder of Latonr,
76 ; Gleneral WindischgnUa oon-
Vieiiiui,0(nigTMaot,ii 30— 31, 3S,8S—
71
ViKennch Armutice of, iii. 62
TikgD^ Cupituktaon ot, to AuHtriooH,
m.96
VaiKtnoica, iii. 266
VillaiDariiiA, Sordiniaii ai]il>aft(idor fti
Naplo, ii:. 291
Tillile, De, Boj-nlist member of
Chamber of Deputiei ; scheme for
a FmLchiee Bill, ii. 1 10 ; ent«n the
nnder Chorlea Z., 368
ViUenauve, Admiisl, i. 2BG; defeated
by Nelson «t Trafalgar, 2S0
Timieiro, Battle of, i. 386
Vincent, 8t., Battle of, Ifil ; Dcm
Miguai's fleet deatrojed by Captain
Charlea Napier, it 426
Tittoria,L372, 30*
Toluntoer Foroea in England, iiL 279
127*
Wallachia, proposed annexBtiDn to
Eossia, i- 31S. Entry of RuHaiun
boope (1363), iii. 193 ; union
with Moldavia, 236
War of Liberation, i. 400
Waissw, Advance of Frusisiana on, L
89 ; Grand Dochy of, 347. Tielded
to Eusaia by Fnuna, ii 26 ; Qrand
Dachy restored to iodppendeuco
tinder the title of Kingdom of
Foland by Alexander, i. 80 ; insur-
rection (1830), 392 ; captured, 397.
TumuItB and appointmont of Qrajid
Jiake C<mst>Lntme aa Vicomv, iii.
834; levy and in<urrectiaa (1863),
33S
Wartbiug Festival, ii. 127, 128 (note)
Waterloo, Battle of, ii. £3— 66
WattignieH, Buttle of, I 81
M'eimar, Grand Duke of, ii. 123—129
Weimar, home of Goethe, i. 38
WeiBsenborg, i. 69 ; stormed bf
Austriona, 87 ; taken by French, 87;
battle of, iii. 433
Welledey, Sir Arthur (mw WellingtoD,
Duke of)
Wellington, Duke of,Iands in Portugal,
i. 386; battle of Vimieiro, it.;
defeats the French at TaluTera,
42G ; retreRtg into Portugal, 427 ;
at I'orros Vednit, Mt ; campaign
of 1811, 447: oampign of IB12,
battle of Salaiuanca, 449 ; enter*
Uadrid, ib. ; campaign of 1813, vic-
tory of Vittoria, 620 ; entora Fiano^
it. Amlassador at FariH, ii. 19 and
note ; Bucueedn Lord Castlereagh at
the Congress of Vienna, 31, 39; at
head of Hkigliah armv at Urusaehu
48 ; at Quatre Bras, 60 ; Battle of
Waterloo, 6S — 66; airives In
Parin, and proposes FuuchS aa
Minister to Louis XVIll., 69;
against taking Alsaoe and Lor-
raine from FianoB, 61 ; foreign
policy in Sicily, France, and
Spain, 87<B0 ; abatejns from plead-
ing for the life of Marabal Ney,
99 ; protests to Louis XVllI.
yinst the machinutions of Count
Aitoia in the French Chambers,
114 i attempt on his lite, 134 ; asked
to presida at a Conference at
Uadrid; called "the Man of Europe,"
172 ; repreeenta England at the
Gongreas of Verona, 216 ; mission
to St. PotOTBbarg, 321; Prime
Uiniitar, 328 ; iiisista on limitation
of Qreoce, 346 ; policy with regard
to Belgium, 386. The Emporor
Nicholaa conRults with him re-
Bpeuting impending fall of Ottoman
461
Warther, Bnron, Prusgian Ambaaaador
at Pari* (1870), iii. 418
Weaaeifaiyi, Count, Transylvaiuan
deputy, exiled for Liberal princi-
ples, li. 483
Weasenberg, Count, Anstrian Uiniatar,
iii. 72
Westphalia, Kingdom of, ffiven br
Napoleon to hia brother Jerome, i.
347 ; preparea to revolt against Uie
French, 407 ; requisitions for
French troops, 462. Dissolution
after Battle of Leipzig, ii. 8
Westphalia, Tiwity of 1Q48, i. 17
Whig party, i. 61 ; portion of, eap-
port !^tt against France, 64
flfiddin, iiL 499
Wilberforca, William, efforta tor ex-
tinction of English slave-trade, ii.
Wilholmahuhe, Palace of, place of eap-
tivity o£ Napoleon HI., iii. 447
William I. (of Prussiu), suppressc*
Badan inaurreotion a« Crown
Prinoe, iii, ISS : hia Besenoy
at
UODSSIT mmoFM.
NapoleOD
dnriair ltd brother Fredorick
Willian IV.'i withdrawal from
pufalio •flain, 306; diBmiaiea
ths HinUtrr, and appoints Prince
Antony to office, 306 ; reort^niseii
the army, 309, 310; sacceedi to
the throne (lS6t), 313; lupporta
the autocratio policy of BiHOanlt,
SIB, 320^ approTea of Biamarck'a
meaBurea againit the Preia, 321 ;
Danish wnr, 3S0 ; hia difforpncea
with Biimarck, S5S, 363; allianca
with Italy ogamet Austria, 364 ;
at Konigmitz, 376 ; chief of North
German Podeiation, and hie aectet
treaties with the South OernuiD
Statee, 381 ; interview with Count
Benedetti at Ema on the election
of Prinoe I>opold to the Bpanish
throne, 416, 419; at Onvelotte,
fits the lurTencler of
n. at Sedan, 447; aa-
title of Emperor of
Oermany, 468
Willimn IV., policy of non-intervention
with re^rd to Bolfpum, ii. 386
Wilna, hEU^quarteri of HuBHinn army
in 1812, i. 463 ; entry of Nnpoleon,
466 ; abandoned by the French,
476. Under Muraneff, iii. 3SB
Winckelmann, I 21
WindischgTutz, Count, subduea Iha
nbellioo at Prague, and acts u
DicUtoT, iii. 64: marohea on Vienna
nnd conquers it, 77—79 ; oecupiea
Feeth, 86 ; remored from hia
command, SO
Witgenstoin, Bunsinn commandeT, i.
474, 4S6, ii.; 338, 339, 340
WladimireKO, Thectdor, Roumaniitn
iDBOigent, ii. 269, 370 ; death, 272
WoidsworUi, i. 4«
Workehc^, Nntional, in Prance, iii.
3T ; Abolition aimi-d at by National
AJvwmbly, 39; entirely abolished,
a
Woinu, CBptared hy n«nch, L ll
Woniip, Public, in Fnuioa, L t-
■nd note
Worth, taken by EVanoh, L 87. Bat)
126 ; tskee lefoge with n
army in Hantoa, 126
Wiirtemberg, i. 36, formalicai tt m
Conatitat^ iL 147
Wiirtsmberg, Doke o^ hia anniatic*
with the French, i. 127
WOrtemberg, 'Prinoa Engena ol^ at-
tack* the Tnrfci, ii. 339
oamp^ L 77 (Aote)
York, Von, Pnuman oommander, L
47S ; his convention with the Ri»-
nam, 479 ; president of Prussian
Aasemhly, 481 ; defeat! the French
at Hdckem, S14
York, Dnke of, takes Valencisniies, L
75; driven from Dunkirk, 79;
defealed (it Turcoinf*, 91 ; suoeeeda
Sir Kalph Abercromby in Ui« com<
mand of armyin HoUand. 194 ; hia
1B7
Zichy, Oonnt Eogfaie, iii. M
Znaim, Annistico of, i. 425
ZoUverein, The, iL 406 ; beoeScid
results on CiCTman commerce, 407
ZomalacaiT^fiii, Carliat leader, no-
torioOs over Hoyaliata, ii. 434;
death, 438
Znnch, evacuated by the French, L
181 1 battle between French ad
RD«nq>% laS. Ttftj «f , iii. if*
D,a,l,zc.bvG00gfo ■ t
D,a,l,zc.bvG00gIe
D,a,l,zc.bvG00gIe
D,a,l,zc.bvG00gIe
D,a,l,zc.bvG00gIe