■ ! (I
,, ' (£)
' i ==
|4 M^^M^
.|.:' ^=SCC
= CNJ
= C0
iCD
■ I
■'■)■■'' ;
■ i,;.:i -''V,-,; ';
^•■■:;:^;!: ■:-'
;r;;|t!'!"i-: 1,1':'
i ' ■■ 1 ■ 1 : : , ■ r I ■ ;
.'.H
-.;+»•-■
I ;.;';
iil;!;-i;'iS-:::
, llCV«tJ'tA%«kl
Digitized by the Internet Archive
in 2007 with funding from
IVIicrosoft Corporation
http://www.archive.org/details/algebrawitharithOObrahuoft
''''f^
ALGEBRA,
WITH
ARITHMETIC AND MENSURATION,
FROM THE
SANSCRIT.
London : PriotcJ by C Ronorth,
Bell-yard, Temple-bar.
ALGEBRA,
WITH
ARITHMETIC AND MENSURATION,
FROM THE
SANSCRIT
or
BRAHMEGUPTA AND BHASCARA.
•
TRANSLATED BY
HENRY THOMAS COLEBROOKE, Esq.
F. R. S. ; M. JJNN. AND C£OL. SOC. AND R. INST. LONDON; AS. SOC. BENGAL;
AC. SC. MUNICH,
LONDON:
JOHN MURRAY, ALBEMARLE STREET.
1817.
.675.
CONTENTS.
Page.
DiSSERTATIOJf • i
NOTES AND ILLUSTRATIONS.
A. Scholiasts of Bha'scara xxv
B. Astronomy of Brahmegupta . ■. xxviii
C. Brahma-sidd'hdnta, Title of his Astronomy xxx
D. Verification of his Text xxxi
E. Chronology of Astronomical Authorities, according to Astrono-
mers of Ujjayani xxxiii
F. Age of Brahmegupta, from astronomical data xxxv
G. Aryabhatta's Doctrine xxxvii
H. (Reference from p. ix. 1.21.) Scautlness of Additions by later
Writers on Aljgfpbra xl
I. Age of AnrABHATTA xU
K. Writings and Age of Vara'ha-mihira xlv
L. Introduction and Progress of Algebra among the Italians ... li
M. Arithmetics of Diophantus Ixi
N. Progress and Proficiency of the Arabians in Algebra Ixiv
O. Communication of the Hindus with Western Nations on Astro-
logy and Astronomy Ixxviii
BHASCARA.
ARITHMETIC (Lildvatl)
Chapter I. Introduction. Axioms. Weights and Measures . . 1
Chapter II. Sect. I. Invocation. Numeration 4
Sect. II. Eight Operations of Arithmetic : Addition, &c. 5
Sect. III. Fractions 13
Sect. IV. Cipher 19
I
Chapter
Chapter
Chapter
Chapter
Chapter
Chapter
Chapter
Chapter
Chapter
Chapter
Chapter
CONTENTS.
III. Afiscellaneous.
Sect. I. Inversion 21
Sect. II. Supposition 23
Sect. III. Concurrence . ; 26
Sect. IV. Problem concerning Squares ... 27
Sect. V. Assimilation 29
Sect. VI. Rule of Proportion 33
IV. Mixture.
Sect. I. Interest 39
Sect. II. Fractions 42
Sect. III. Purchase and Sale 43
Sect. IV. A Problem 45
Sect. V. Alligation 46
Sect. VI. Permutation and Combination ... 49
V. Progression.
Sect. I. Arithmetical 51
Sect. II. Geometrical 55
VI. Plane FSgure 58
VII. Excavations and Content of Solids 97
VIII. Stacks 100
IX. Saw 101
X. Mound of Grain i03
XI. Shadow of a Gnomon 106
XII. Pulverizer fCM^/aca) 112
XIII. Combination 123
ALGEBRA (Vija-gatiita.)
Chapter I. Sect. I. Invocation, &c 129
Sect. II. Algorithm of Negative and Affirmative
Quantities 133
Sect. III. of Cipher 136
Sect. IV. of Unknown Quantity . . ] 39
Sect. V. of Surds 145
Chapter II. Pulverizer 156
CONTENTS.
Chapter III. Affected Square. Sect. I. 170
Sect. II. Cyclic Method '. . 175
Sect. III. Miscellaneous 179
Chapter IV. Simple liquation 185
Chapter V. Quadratic, &c. Equations 207
Chapter VI. Multiliteral Equations 227
Chapter VII. Varieties of Quadratics 245
Chapter VIII. Equation involving a Factum of Unknown Quantities 268
Chapter IX. Conclusion 275
BRAHMEGUPTA.
CHAPTER XII. ARITHMETIC (Gariita.)
Sect. I. Algorithm 277
Sect. II. Mixture 287
Sect. III. Progression 29()
Sect. IV. Plane Figure 305
Sect. V. Excavations 312
Sect. VI. Stacks 314
Sect. VII. Saw 315
&c^ F7//. Mounds of Grain 316
Sect. IX. Measure by Shadow 317
Sect. X. Supplement 319
CHAPTER XVIII. ALGEBRA (CuHaca.)
Sect. I. Pulverizer 325
Sect. II. Algorithm 339
Sect. III. Simple Equation 344
Sect. IV. Quadratic Equation 346
Sect. V. Equation of several unknown . . . 348
Sect. VI. Equation involving a factum ... 361
Sect. VII. Square affected by coefficient . . . 363
Sect. VIII. Problems 373
DISSERTATION.
The history of sciences, if it want the prepossessing attractions of political
histoiy and narration of events, is nevertheless not wholly devoid of in-
terest and instruction. A laudable curiosity prompts to inquire the sources
of knowledge ; and a review of its progress furnishes suggestions tending to
promote the same or some kindred study. We would know the people and
the names at least of the individuals, to whom we owe particular discoveries
and successive steps in the advancement of knowledge. If no more be
obtained by the research, still the inquiry has not been wasted, which points
aright the gratitude of mankind.
In the history of mathcuiatical science, it has long been a question to
whom the invention of Algebraic analysis is due? among what people, in
what region, was it devised ? by whom was it cultivated and promoted ? or
by whose labours was it reduced to form and system? and finally from what
quarter did the diffusion of its knowledge proceed ? No doubt indeed is
entertained of the source from which it was received immediately by modern
Europe ; though the channel have been a matter of question. We are well
assured, that the Arabs were mediately or immediately our instructors in this
study. But the Arabs themselves scarcely pretend to the discovery of
Algebra. They were not in general inventors but scholars, during the
short period of their successful culture of the sciences : and the germ at least
of the Algebraic analysis is to be found among the Greeks in an age not
precisely determined, but more than probably anterior to the earliest dawn
of civilization among the Arabs: and this science in a more advanced state
subsisted among the Hindus prior to the earliest disclosure of it by the
Arabians to modern Europe.
The object of the present publication is to exhibit the science in the state
in which the Hindus possessed it, by an exact version of the most approved
b
ii DISSERTATION.
treatise on it in the ancient language of India, with one of the earlier treatises
(the only extant one) from which it was compiled. The design of this pre-
liminary dissertation is to deduce from these and from the evidence which
will be here offered, the degree of advancement to which the science had
arrived in a remote age. Observations will be added, tending to a compa-
rison of the Indian, with the Arabian, the Grecian, and the modern Algebra:
and the subject will be left to the consideration of the learned, for a con-
clusion to be drawn by them from the internal, no less than the external
proof, on the question who can best vindicate a claim to the merit of having
originally invented or first improved the methods of computation and analysis,
which are the groundwork of both the simple and abstruser parts of Mathe-
matics ; that is, Arithmetic and Algebra : so far at least as the ancient inven-
tions are affected; and also in particular points, where recent discoveries are
concerned.
In the actual advanced condition of the analytic art, it is not hoped, that
this version of ancient Sanscrit treatises on Algebra, Arithmetic, and Mensu-
ration, will add to the resources of the art, and throw new light on mathe-
matical science, in any othnr respect, than as concerns its history. Yet the
remark may not seem inapposite, that had an earlier version of these treatises
been completed, had they been translated and given to ilie public, when the
notice of mathematicians was first drawn to the attainments of the Hindus
in astronomy and in sciences connected with it, sonie addition would have
been then made to the means and resources of Algebra for the general solu-
tion of problems by methods which have been re-invented, or have been per-
fected, in the last age.
The treatises in question, which occupy the present volume, are the Vjja-
ganita and Lilcwati of Bhascara a'cha'rya and the Gaiiitad'haya and
Cuiiacdd'hyaya of Brahmegupta. Tlie two first mentioned constitute the
preliminary portioiiof Bhascara's Course of Astronomy, entitled Sidd'hanta-
sirdmani. Tlie two last are the twelfth and eighteenth chapters of a similar
course of astronomy, by Brahmegupta, entitled Brahna-siddlidnta.
The questions to be first examined in relation to these works are their
authenticity and their age. To the consideration of those points we now
proceed.
The period when Bha'scara, the latest of the authors now named, flou-
rished, and the time when he wrote, are ascertained with unusual precision.
DISSERTATION.
m
He completed his great work, the Sldd'hanta-siromarii, as he himself informs
us in a passage of it,' in the year 1072 Saca. This information receives cor-
roboration, if any be wanted, from the date of another of his works, the
Caj-ana-cutuhala, a practical astronomical treatise, the epoch of which is
1105 Saca;'' 33 years subsequent to the completion of the systematic
treatise. The date of the Sidd' hanta-siromaiii, of which the Vija-ganita and
Lilavati are parts, is fixt then with the utmost exactness, on the most satis-
factory grounds, at the middle of the twelfth century of the Christian era,
A.D. 1150.'
The genuineness of the text is established with no less certainty by nume-
rous commentaries in Sanscrit, besides a Persian version of it. Those com-
mentaries comprise a perpetual gloss, in which every passage of the original
is noticed and interpreted : and every word of it is repeated and explained.
A comparison of them authenticates the text where they agree ; and would
serve, where they did not, to detect any alterations of it that might have
taken place, or variations, if any had crept in, subsequent to the composition
of the earliest of them. A careful collation of several commentaries,* and
of thi'ee copies of the original work, has bppn made , and it will be seen ia
the notes to the translation hn» unimportant are the discrepancies.
From comparison and collation, it appears then, that the work of Bha's-
CARA, exhibiting the same uniform text, which the modem transcripts of it
do, was in the hands of both Mahommedans and Hindus between two and
three centuries ago : and, numerous copies of it having been diffused through-
out India, at an earlier period, as of a performance held in high estimation,
it was the subject of study and habitual reference in countries and places
so remote from each other as the north and west of India and the southern
peninsula : or, to speak with the utmost precision, Jambusara in the west,
Agra in North Hindustan, and Parthapiwa, Golagrdma, Amar6>vat't, and
Nandigrcima, iu the south.
* GolMhydya ; or l«x:ture on the sphere, c. 11. § SG, As. Res. vol. 12. p. 314.
• As. Res. ibid.
' Though the matter be introductory, the preliminary treatises on arithmetic and algebra may
have been added subsequently, as is hinted by one of the commentators of the astronomical part.
(Vdrtic.) The order there intimated places them after the computation of planets, but before the
treatise on ipherics; which cotstains the date.
♦ Note A.
b2
iv DISSERTATION.
This, though not marking any extraordinary antiquity, nor approaching
to that of the author himself, was a material point to be determined : as there
will be in the sequel occasion to show, that modes of analysis, and, in parti-
cular, general methods for the solution of indeterminate problems both of the
first and second degrees, are taught in the Vjja-ganita, and those for the first
degree repeated in the Lildvatl, which were unknown to the mathematicians
of the west until invented anew in the last two centuries by algebraists of
France and England. It will be also shown, that Bhascara, who himself
flourished more than six hundred and fifty years ago, was in this respect a
compiler, and took those methods from Indian authors as much more aucient
than himself
That Bha'scaka's text (meaning the metrical rules and examples, apart
from the interspersed gloss;) had continued unaltered from the period of the
compilation of his work until the age of the commentaries now current, is
apparent from the care with which they have noticed its various readings,
and the little actual importance of these variations; joined to the considera-
tion, that earlier commentaries, including tlie author's own explanatory
annotations of his text, -wcro extant, and lay before them for consultation
and reference. Those earlier commentaries ar« occasionally cited by name :
particularly the Ganita-caumudi, which is repeatedly quote^i by more than
one of the scholiasts.*
No doubt then can be reasonably entertained, that we now possess the
arithmetic and algebra of Bha'scara, as composed and published by him in
the middle of the twelfth century of the Christian era. The age of his pre-
cursors cannot be determined with equal precision. Let us proceed, how-
ever, to examine the evidence, such as we can at present collect, of their
antiquity.
Towards the close of his treatise on Algebra,* Bha'scara informs us, that
it is compiled and abridged from the more diffuse works on the same subject,
bearing the names of Brahme, (meaning no doubt Brahmegupta,)
Srid'hara and Padmana'bha; and in the body of his treatise, he has cited
a passage of Srid'hara's algebra,' and another of Padmana'bha's.* He
repeatedly adverts to preceding writers, and refers to them in general terms,,
' For example, by Su'ryada'sa, under Lildvati, §74; and still more frequently by Ranca-
naYha.
» Vija-gaiiUa, § 218. ' Ibid. § 131. ♦ Ibid. § 142.
DISSERTATION. v
where his commentators understand him to allude to Arya-bhat't'a, to
Brahmegupta, to the latter's scholiast Chaturve'da Prit'hudaca Swa'miV
and to the other writers above mentioned.
Most, if not all, of the treatises, to which he thus alludes, must have been
extant, and in the hands of his commentators, when they wrote; as appears
from their quotations of them; more especially those of Brahmegupta and
Arya-bhat't'a, who are cited, and particularly the first mentioned, in several
instances." A long and diligent research in various parts of India, has, how-
ever, failed of recovering any part of the Padmanabha v'lja, (or Algebra of
Padmana'bha,) and of the Algebraic and other works of Arya-bh atta.' But
the translator has been more fortunate in regard to the works of Suii)'HARA
and Brahmegupta, having in his collection Srid'hara's compendium of
arithmetic, and a copy, incomplete however, of tlie text and scholia of Brah-
megupta's Brahma-sidd'hanta, comprising among other no less interesting
matter, a chapter treating of arithmetic and mensuration ; and another, the
subject of which is algebra : both of them fortunately complete.*
The commentary is a perpetual one ; successively quoting at length each
A'erse of the text ; proceeding to the interpretation of it, word by word ; and
subjoining elucidations and remarks : and its colophon, at the close of each
chapter, gives the title of the work and name of the author.' Now the name,
which is there given, Chaturve'da Prit'hudaca Swa'mi, is that of a cele-
brated scholiast of Brahmegupta, frequently cited as such by the commen-
tators of Bha'scara and by other astronomical writers: and the title of the
work, Brahma-siddhunta, or sometimes Brahma sphuta-sidd' hdnta, corre-
sponds, in the shorter form, to the known title of Brahmegupta's treatise in
the usual references to it by Bha'scara's commentators;* and answers, in the
longer form, to the designation of it, as indicated in an introductory couplet
which is quoted from Brahmegupta by Lacshmida'sa, a scholiast of
Bha'scara.^
Remarking this coincidence, the translator proceeded to collate, with the
' ^V'-g"'*- Ch. 5. note of Su'rtada'sa. Also V'tj.'gaii. § 174 ; and Lil. § 246 ad finem.
* For example, under Z,)/. Ch. 11. ' Note G. ♦ Note B.
' Vitand-bhdshya by Chatuuve'da Piut'uu'daca Swa'mi, son of Mad'uu'su'dana, on tlie
Brahma-sidiThdnta ; (or sometimes Brahma-sphuta-sidd'/tunta.)
* They often quote from the Drahma-sidd'hunta after premising a reference to Brahmegupta.
-' NoteC.
vi DISSERTATION.
text and commeatury, numerous quotations from both, which he found in
Bha'scara's writings or in those of his cxpositoi-s. The result confirmed the
indication, and established the identity of both text and scholia as Buahme-
gupta's treatise, and the gloss of Prit'hu'daca. The authenticity of this
Brakma-sidd'hdttta is further confirmed by numerous quotations in the com-
mentary of Bhatt6tpala on the sanhitA of Vara'ha mihira : as the quo-
tations from the Brahma-sidd'hunta in that commentaiy, (which is the M'ork
of an author who flourished eight hundred and fifty years ago,) are verified
in the copy under consideration. A few instances of both will suffice ; and
cannot fail to produce conviction.'
It is confidently concluded, that the Chapters on Arithmetic and Algebra,
fortunately entire in a copy, in many parts imperfect, of Brahmegupta's
celebrated work, as here described, are genuine and authentic. It remains
to investigate the age of the author.
Mr. Davis, who first opened to the public a correct view of the astronomical
computations of the Hindus,* is of opinion, that Brahmegupta lived in the
7th century of the Christian era.' Dr. William Hunter, who resided for
some time with a British Embassy at l/jjai/ani, and made diligent researches
into the remains of Indian science, at that ancient seat of Hindu astronomical
knowledge, was there furnished by the learned astronomers whom he consulted,
with the ages of the principal ancient authorities. They assigned to Brahme-
gupta the date of 550 Saca ; which answers to A. D. 628. The grounds,
on which they proceeded, are unfortunately not specified : but, as they gave
Bk a'scara's age correctly, as well as several other dates right, which admit of
being verified ; it is presumed, that they had grounds, though unexplained, for
the information which they communicated.*
Mr. Bentley, who is little disposed to favour the antiquity of an Indian
astronomer, has given his reasons for considering the astronomical system
which Brahmegupta teaches, to be between twelve and thirteen hundred
years old (12631 years in A. D. 1799)-' Now, as the system taught by this
author is professedly one corrected and adapted by him to conform with the
observed positions of the celestial objects when he wrote,* the age, when
their positions would be conformable with the results of computations made
as by him directed, is precisely die age of the author himself : and so far as
» Note D. * As. Res. 2. 225. » Ibid. 9- 242.
♦ Note E. » As. Res. 6. 586. • Supra.
DISSERTATION. iVii
Mr. Bentley's calculations may be considered to approximate to the truth,
the date of Brahmegupta's performance is determined with hke approach
to exactness, within a certain latitude however of uncertainty for allowance
to be made on account of the inaccuracy of Hindu observations.
The translator has assigned on former occasions* the grounds upon which
he sees reason to place the author's age, soon after the period, when the ver-
nal equinox coincided with the beginning of the lunar mansion and zodiacal
asterism Aswini, where the Hindu ecliptic now commences. He is sup-
ported in it by the sentiments of Bha'scara and other Indian astronomers,
who infer from Brahmegupta's doctrine concerning the solstitial points, of
which he does not admit a periodical motion, that he lived when the equi-
noxes did not, sensibly to him, deviate from the beginning of Aswini and
middle of Chiird on the Hindu sphere.* On these grounds it is maintained,
that Brahmegupta is rightly placed in the sixth or beginning of the seventh
century of the Christian era ; as the subjoined calculations will more parti-
cularly show.' The age when Brahmegupta flourished, seems then, from
the concurrence of all these arguments, to be satisfactorily settled as ante-
cedent to the earliest dawn of the culture of sciences among the Arabs ; and
consequently establishes the fact, that the Hindus were in possession of
algebra before it was known to the Arabians.
Brahmegupta's treatise, however, is not the earliest work known to have
been written on the same subject by an Indian author. The most eminent
scholiast of Bha'scara* quotes a passage of Arya-bh att'a specifying algebra
under the designation of Fija, and making separate mention of Cut't'aca, which
more particularly intends a problem subservient to the general method of
resolution of indeterminate problems of the first degree : he is understood by
another of Bha'scara's commentators' to be at the head of the elder writers,
to whom the text then under consideration adverts, as having designated by
the name of Mad'hyamdharana the resolution of affected quadratic equations
by means of the completion of the square. It is to be presumed, therefore,
that the treatise of Arya-bhatta then extant, did extend to quadratic equa-
tions in the determinate analysis ; and to indeterminate problems of the first
degree ; if not to those of the second likewise, as most probably it did.
This ancient astronomer and algebraist was anterior to both Vara'ha-mihiha
' A». Res. 9. S29. * Ibid. 12. p. 215. * Note F.
♦ Ganesa, a distiguished mathematician and astronomer. ' Sun. on Fi;'.-ga». § 128.
▼iii ' DISSERTATION.
and Brahmegupta ; being repeatedly named by the latter; and the determi-
nation of the age when he flourished is particulai ly interesting, as his astro-
nomical system, though on some points agreeing, essentially disagreed on
others, with that which those authors have followed, and which the Hindu
astronomers still maintain.'
He is considered by the commentators of the Suryasidd'hanta and Siroma/ii,^
as the earliest of uninspired and mere human writers on the science of astro-
nomy ; as having introduced requisite corrections into the system of Para'-
SARA, from whom he took the numbers for the planetary mean motions; as
having been followed in the tract of emendation, after a sufficient interval to
make further correction requisite, by Durgasinha and Mihira; who were
again succeeded after a further interval by Brahmegupta son of Jishnu.'
In short, Arva-bhat'ta was founder of one of the sects of Indian astrono-
mers, as Puli's'a, an author likewise anterior to both Vara'hamihira and
Brahmegupta, was of another : which were distinguished by names derived
from the discriminative tenets respecting the commencement of planetary
motions at sun-rise according to the first, but at midnight according to the
latter,* on the meridian of LancA, at the bejrinninsr of the arreat astronomical
cycle. A third sect began the astronomical day, as well as the great period,
at noon.
His name accompanied the intimation which the Arab astronomers (under
the Abbasside Khalifs, as it would appear,) received, that three distinct astro-
nomical systems were current among the Hindus of those days : and it is but
slightly corrupted, certainly not at all disguised, in the Arabic representation
oi'\t A rjabahar, or rather Arjabhar.^ The two other systems were, first, Brah-
megupta's Sidd'hdnta, whicli was the one they became best acquainted with,
and to which they apply the denomination oi' the sind-hitid; and second, that
' Note G. • Nrtsmka on Sur, Gan'e's'a pref. to Grah. Ugh.
' As. Res. 2. 235, 242, and 244; and Note Jl.
f
♦ Brahmegupta, ch. U. The names are Audayacahom Udai/a rising; and Ardkaratrka from
Ardhar&tri, midnight. The third school is noticed by Bhattotpala the scholiast of Vara'ha
MIHIRA, under the denomination of Mudhyandinas, as alleging the commencement of the astrono-
mical period at noon : (from Madhyandina, mid-day.)
' The Sanscrtt i, it is to be remembered, is the character of a peculiar sound often mistaken for r,
and which the Arabs were likely so to write, rather than with a te or with a tau. The Hindi i is
generally written by the English in India with an r. Example : Ber (rata), the Indian fig.
vulg. Banian tree.
DISSERTATION. ix
of j^rca the sun, which they write Arcand, a corruption still prevalent in
the vulgar Hiiidi}
Aryabhatt'a appears to have had more correct notions of the true explana-
tion of celestial phenomena than Brahmf.gupta himself; who, in a few in-
stances, correcting errors of his predecessor, but oftener deviating from that
predecessor's juster views, has been followed by the herd of modern Hindu
astronomers, in a system not improved, but deteriorated, since the time of
the more ancient author.
Considering the proficiencj' of Arvabiiat'ta in astronomical science, and
adverting to the fact of his having written upon Algebra, as well as to the
circumstance of his being named by numerous writers as the founder of a
sect, or author of a system in astronomy, and being quoted at the head of
algebraists, when the commentators of extant treatises have occasion to
mention early and original' writers on this branch of science, it is not neces-
sary to seek further for a mathematician qualified to have been the great im-
prover of the analytic art, and likely to have been the person, by whom it
was carried to the pitch to which it is found to have attained among the
Hindus, and at which it is observed to bo nearly stationary through the long-
lapse of ages which have siaice passed: the later additions being i'ew and un-
essential in the writings of Buahmegupta, of Bua'scara, and of Jnya'na
RAJA, though they lived at intervals of centuries from each other.
AftYABHATTA then being the earliest author known to have treated of
Algebra among the Plindus, and being likely to be, if not the inventor, tlw
improver, of that analysis, by whom too it was pushed nearly to the whole
degree of excellence which it is found to have attained among them; it be-
comes in an especial manner interesting to investigate any discoverable trace
in the absence of better and more direct evidence, which may tend to fix the;
date of his labours, or to indicate the time which elapsed between him and
Bkahmegupta, whose age is more accurately determined.'
Taking Aryabhatt'a, for reasons given in the notes,' to have preceded
BRAiiMEGupTAand VARA'iiAJirniRA by several centuries; and Brahmegupta
to have flourished about twelve hundred years ago;* and Vara'ha mihira,
concerning whose works and age some further notices will be found in a sub-
' See notes I, K, and N. ' SuaYA-DA'sA on Vija-gaiiUa, ch. 5,
^ Note I. ♦ See before and note F.
X DISSERTATION.
joined note,* to have livqd at the beginning of the sixth century after Christ,*
it appears probable that this earhest of known Hindu algebraists wrote as
far back as the fifth century of the Christian era; and, perhaps, in an earlier
age. Hence it is concluded, tliat he is nearly as ancient as the Grecian
algebraist Diophantus, supposed, on the authority of Abulfaraj,^ to have
flourished in the time of the Emperor Julian, or about A. D. 360.
Admitting the Hindu and Alexandrian authors to be nearly equally
ancient, it must be conceded in favour of the Indian algebraist, that he was
more advanced in the science ; since he appears to have been in possession of
the resolution of equations involving several unknown, which it is not clear,
nor fairly presumable, that Diophantus knew ; and a general method for
indeterminate problems of at least the first degree, to a knowledge of which
the Grecian algebraist had certainly not attained ; though he displays infinite
sagacity and ingenuity in particular solutions ; and though a certain routine
is discernible in them.
A comparison of the Grecian, Hitidu, and Arabian algebras, will more dis-
tinctly show, which of them had made the greatest progress at the earliest
age of each, that can be now traced.
The notation or algorithm of Algebra is so essential to this art, as to deserve
tlie first notice in a review of the Indian method of analysis, and a compari-
son of it with the Grecian and Arabian algebras. The Hindu algebraists use
abbreviations and initials for sj'mbols: they distinguish negative quantities
by a dot;* but have not any mark, besides the absence of the negative sign,
to discriminate a positive quantity. No marks or symbols indicating opera-
tions of addition, or multiplication, &c. are employed by them : nor any an-
nouncing equality' or relative magnitude (greater or less).* But a factum is
denoted by the initial syllable of a word of that import,' subjoined to the
terms which compose it, between which a dot is sometimes interposed. A
fraction is indicated by placing the divisor under the dividend,^ but without
a line of separation. The two sides of an equation are ordered in the same
' Note K. •'■ See before and note E. ' Pocockc's edition and translation, p. 89.
* Fy.-gan. § 4.
' The sign of equality was first used by Robert Recorde, because, as he says, no two things can
-be more equal than a pair of parallels, or geniowe lines of one length. Hutton.
* The signs of relative magnitude were first introduced into European algebra by Harriot.
' Py.-ga«. §21. »Li7. §33.
DISSERTATION. xi
manner, one under the other:' and, this method of placing terms under each
other being likewise practised upon other occasions," the intent is in the
instance to be collected from the recital of the steps of the process in words
at length, which always accompanies the algebraic piocess. That recital is
also requisite to ascertain the precise intent of vertical lines interposed
between the terms of a geometric progression, but used also upon other
occasions to separate and discriminate cjuantities. The symbols of unknown
quantity are not confined to a single one: but extend to ever so great a
variety of denominations: and the characters used are initial syllables of the
names of colours,' excepting the first, which is the initial o^ydvat-tavat, as much
as; words of the same import with Bombelli's tanto; used by him for thesame
purpose. Colour therefore means unknown quantity, or the symbol of it:
and the same Sanscrit word, tarna, also signifying a literal character, letters
are accordingly employed likewise as symbols; either taken from the alpha-
bet ;* or else initial syllables of words signifying the subjects of the problem ;
whether of a general nature,' or specially the names of geometric lines in
algebraic demonstrations of geometric propositions or solution of geometric
problems.* Symbols too are employed, not only for unknown quantities,
of which the value is sought; but for variable quantities of which the value
may be arbitrarily put, (F/;. Ch. 6, note on commencement of § 153 — 156,)and,
especially in demonstrations, for both given and sought quantities. Initials of
the terms for square and solid respectively denote those powers ; and combined
they indicate the higher. These are reckoned not by the sums of the
powers; but by their products.^ An initial .syllable is in like manner used
to mark a surd root." The terms of a compound quantity are ordered ac-
cording to the powers; and the absolute number invariably comes last. It
also is distinguished by an initial syllable, as a discriminative token of
known quantity.' Numeral coefficients are employed, inclusive of unity
■which is always noted, and comprehending fractions;'" for the numeral divisor
is generally so placed, rather than under the symbol of the unknown : and in
like manner the negative dot is set over the numeral coefficient : and not
over the literal character. The coefficients are placed after the symbol of the
' Vlj.-gan. and Brahm, 18, passim. * Vij.-gan. § 55. ' Vij.-gan. § 17. Brahm. c. 18, § 2.
♦ Vij.'gan. ch. 6. ' Vij-San- §111. * ^'ij--gati. § U6.
» Li/. § 26, " nj.-gan. § 59. » Vij.-gan. § 17.
'° Stevinu$ in lilce. manner included fractions in coefficients,
C2
xli DISSERTATION.
unknown quantity.* Equations are not ordered so as to put all the quanti-
ties positive; nor to give precedence to a positive term in a compound (jiian-
tity : lor the negative terms are retained, and even preferably put in the first
place. In stating the two sides of an equation, the general, though not inva-
riable, practice is, at least in the first instance,'^to repeat every term, which
occurs in the one side, on the other: annexing nought for the coefficient, if a
term of that particular denomination be there wanting.
If reference be made to the writings of Diophantus, and of the Arabian
algebraists, and their early ilisciples in Europe, it will be found, that the
notation, which has been here described, is essentially different from all
theirs; much as they vary. Diophantus employs the inverted medial of
iXAii4'»f, defect or want (opposed to vir»(^n, substance or abundance") to indi-
cate a negative quantity. lie prefixes that mark '|» to the quantity in ques-
tion. He calls the unknown, x^iifA^; representing it by the final j, which
he doubles for the plural; while the Arabian algebraists apply the equiva-
lent word for number to the constant or known term; and the Hindus, on
the other hand, refer the word for numerical character to the coefficient.
Pie denotes the moniid, or unit absolute, by jm*; and the linear quantity is called
by him arithmos; and designated, like the unknown, by the im^Xsigma. He
marks the further powers by initials of words signifying them: S", x", SS", ix",
xx", &c. for dynamis, power (meaning the scpiare) ; cubos, cube; dynamo-
ilynamis, biquadrate, &c. But he reckons the higher by the sums, not the
products, of the lower. Thus the sixth power is with him the cuho-cubos,
which the Hindus designate as the quadrate-cube, (cube of the square, or
square of the cube).
The Arabian Algebraists are still more sparing of symbols, or rather entirely
destitute of them.* They have none, whether arbitrary or abbreviated, either
for quantities known or unknown, positive or negative, or for the steps and
operations of an algebraic process : but express every thing by words, and
phrases, at full length. Their European scholars introduced a 'icwf and \ery
few abbreviations of names: c", c°, c", for the three first powers; c*, q*, for
the first and second unknown quantities ; p, m, for plus and miims ; and
' ViETA ilid so likewise.
* A word of nearly the same import with the Sanscrit d'huna, wealth, used by /iwic/w algebraists
for the same signification.
*Def. 9. ♦ As. Res. 12. 183.
DISSERTATION. xiJi
'Jjt for the note of radicality ; occur in the first printed work which is that of
Paciolo.' Leonardo 13oxacci of Pisa, the earliest scholar of the Arabians,*
is said by Targiom Tozzkxti to have used the small letters of the alphabet
to denote quantities.' But Leonardo only does so because he represents
quantities by straight lines, and designates those lines by letters, in elucidation
of his Algebraic solutions of problems.*
The Arabians termed the unknown (and they wrought but on one) sfiai
thing. It is translated by Leonardo oi' Pisa and his disciples, by the corre-
spondent Latin word res and Italian cosa ; whence Regola de la Cosa, and
Rule of Coss, with Cossike practise and Cossike number of our older authors,*
for Algebra or Speculative practice, as Paciolo* denominates the analytic
art ; and Cossic number, in writers of a somewhat later date, for the root of
an c(iuation.
The Arabs termed the square of the unknown mdl, possession or wealth ;
translatetl by the Latin ccfisus and Italian censo ; as terms of the same import :
for it is in the acceptation of amount of property or estate^ that census was
here used by Leonardo.
The cube was by the Arabs termed Cub, a die or cube ,• and they combined
these terms mul and cab for compound names of the more elevated powers;
in the manner of Diophantus by the sums of the powers ; and not like the
Hindus by their products. Such indeed, is their method in the modern ele-
mentary works : but it is not clear, that the same mode was obsei-ved by their
earlier writers; for their Italian scholars denominated the biquadrate and
higher powers Relato primo, secundo, tcrtio, &c.
Positive they call zaid additional ; and negative nakis deficient : and, as
before observed, they have no discriminative marks for either of them.
The operation of restoring negative quantities, if any there be, to the po-
sitive form, which is an essential step with them, is termed jei/', or with the
article Aljebr, the mending or restoration. That of coinparing the terms and
taking like from like, which is the next material step in the process of resolu-
• Or Pacioli, Paciuolo, — li, &c. For the namo is variously written by Italian authors.
* See Note L.
' V'laggi, 2d Edit. vol. 2, p. 62.
♦ CossALl, Origine dfU'Algebia, i.
' Robert Recorde's Whetstone of Witte.
* Secondo noi delta Pratica Speculativa. SummaS. 1.
' Census, quicquid fortunaruin quis habet. Steph. T/us.
xiv DISSERTATION.
tion, is called by them mukabalah comparison. Hence the name of Tarik
aljebr wa almukahala, ' the method of restoration and comparison,' which ob-
tained among the Arabs for this branch of the Analytic art ; and hence our
name of Algebra, from Leonardo of Pisas exact version of the Arabic title.
Fi istakhruju'l tnajhulut ba tarik aljebr wa almukdbatah,' De solutione qua-
rundam qua^stionum secundum modum Algebra et Almuchabala."
The two steps or operations, which have thus given name to the method of
analysis, are precisely what is enjoined without distinctive appellations of
them, in the introduction of the arithmetics of Diopiiantus, where he directs,
that, if the quantities be positive on both sides, like are to be taken from
like until one species be equal to one species ; but, if on either side or on
both, any species be negative, the negative species must be added to both sides,
$0 that they become positive on both sides of the equation : after which like
are again to be taken from like, until one species remain on each side. '
The Hindu Algebra, not requiring the terms of the equation to be all ex-
hibited in the form of positive quantity, does not direct the preliminary step
of restoring negative quantity to the affirmative state: but proceeds at once
to the operation of equal subtraction (samasudkana) for the difference of like
terms which is the process denominated by the Arabian Algebraists comparison
(mukabalah). On that point, therefore, the Arabian Algebra has more affinity
to the Grecian than to the Indian analysis.
As to the progress which the Hindus had made in the analytic art, it will
be seen, that they possessed w^ell the arithmetic of surd roots ;* that they were
aware of the infinite quotient resulting from the division of finite quantity
by cipher ;' that they knew the general resolution of equations of the second
degree ; and had touched upon those of higher denomination ; resolving them
in the simplest cases, and in those in which the solution happens to be prac-
ticable by the method which serves for quadratics :* that they had attained a
general solution of indeterminate problems of the first degree :' that they had
arrived at a method for deriving a multitude of solutions of answers to pro-
• KhuUsatiilhisAb. c. 8. Calcutta.
* Liber abbaci, 9. 15. 3. M.S. in Magliab. Libr.
» Def. U.
♦ Brahm. 18. | 27—29. Vij.-gaii. § 29—52.
» Lil. S 45. V'lj.-gaii. \ 15— 16 and § 135.
* Vij-gad. i 129. and § 137—138.
' Brahm. 18. § 3—18. ViJ.-gan. 53—73. Lil. § 2*8—265.
DISSERTATION. xv
blems of the second degree from a single answer found tentatively ;* which
is as near an approach to a general solution of such problems, as was made
until the days of Lagrange, who first demonstrated, that the problem, on
which the solutions of all questions of this naturedepend, is always resolvable
in whole numbers." The Hindus had likewise attempted problems of this
higher order by the application of the method which suffices for those of the
first degree ;' with indeed very scanty success, as might be expected.
They not only applied algebra both to astronomy* and to geometry ;*' but
conversely applied geometry likewise to the demonstration of Algebraic rules.*
In short, they cultivated Algebra much more, and with greater success, than
geometry ; as is evident from the comparatively low state of their knowledge
in the one,^ and the high pitch of their attainments in the other : and they
cultivated it for the sake of astronomy, as they did this chiefly for astro-
logical purposes. The examjjles in the earliest algebraic treatise extant
(Brahmegupta's) are mostly astronomical : and here the solution of indeter-
minate problems is sometimes of real and practical use. The instances in the
later treatise of Algebra by Bha'scara are more various : many of them geo-
metric ; but one astronomical ; the rest numeral : among which a great number
of indeterminate ; and of these some, though not the greatest part, resembling
the questions which chiefly engage the attention of Diophantus. But the
general character of the Diophantine problems and of the Hindu unlimited
ones is by no means alike : and several in the style of Diophantine are noticed
by Bhascara in his arithmetical, instead of his algebraic, treatise.*
To pursue this summary comparison further, Diophantus appears to have
been acquainted with the direct resolution of affected quadratic equations;
but less familiar with the management of them, he seldom touches on it.
Chiefly busied with indeterminate problems of the first degree, he yet seems
to have possessed no general rule for their solution. His elementary in-
structions for the preparation of equations are succinct.' His notation, as
■ Brahn. 18. § 29—49. Vij.-gan. § 75—99. * Mem. of Acad, of Turin : and of Berlin.
' Fy.-gan. § 206—207. * Crrt/iw. 18. passim. Vij.-gan.
' Vij.-gan. §117—127. h 146—152. « Vij.-gan. § 212—214.
' Bruhm. 12. S 21 ; corrected however in Lil. § 169— 170.
* Lil. § 59 — 61, where it appears, however, that preceding writers liad treated the question alge-
braically. See likewise § 139 — 146.
» Def. 1 1.
xvi DISSERTATION.
before observed, scanty and inconvenient. In tbc whole science, he is veiy
far behind the Hindu writers: notwithstanding the infinite ingenuity, by
which he makes up for the want of rule: and althougli presented to us under
the disadvantage of mutilation ; if it be, indeed, certain that the text of only
six, or at most seven, of thirteen books which his introduction announces, has
been preserved.' It is sufficiently clear from what does remain, that the lost
part could not have exhibited a much higher degree of attainment in the art.
It is presumable, that so much as we possess of his work, is a fair specimen
of the progress which he and the Greeks before him (for he is hardly to be
considered as the inventor, since he seems to treat the art as already known ;)
had made in his time.
The points, in which the Hindu Algebra appears particularly distinguished
from the Greek, are, besides a better and more comprehensive algorithm, —
1st, The management of equations involving more than one unknown term.
(This adds to the two classes noticed by the Arabs, namely simple and com-
pound, two, or rather three, other classes of equation.) 2d, The resolution
of equations of a higher order, in which, if they achieved little, they had, at
least, the merit of the attempt, and anticipated a modern discovery in the
solution of biquadratics. 3d, General methods for the solution of indeter-
minate problems of 1st and 2d degrees, in which they went far, indeed,
beyond Diophantus, and anticipated discoveries of modern Algebraists.
4th, Application of Algebra to astronomical investigation and geometrical
demonstration : in which also they hit upon some matters which have been
reinvented in later times.
This brings us to the examination of some of their anticipations of modem
discoveries. The readers notice will be here drawn to three instances in
particular.
The first is the demonstration of the noted proposition of Pythagoras,
concerning the square of the base of a rectangular triangle, equal to the
squares of the two legs containing a right angle. The demonstration is given
two ways in Bha'scara's Algebra, {Vrj.-gaiL § 146.) The first of them is the
same which is delivered by Wallis in his treatise on angular sections, (Ch.
6.) and, as far as appears, then given for the first time.*
' Note M. * He designates the sides C. D. Base B. Segments «, i. Then
B:C::C:«1 ,. . f C'=Bk
B:D::D:Jr'"^'^"^^''^{D.=B*
DISSERTATION. xvii
On the subject of demonstrations, it is to be remarked that the Hindu ma-
thematicians proved propositions both algebraically and geometrically : as is
particularly noticed by Bha'scaua himself, towards the close of his Algebra,
where he gives i)oth modes of proof of a remarkable method for the solution
of indeterminate problems, which involve a factum of two unknown quan-
tities. The rule, which he demonstrates, is of great antiquity in Hindu
Algebra: being found in the works of his predecessor Brahjiegupta, and
being there a quotation from a more ancient treatise ; for it is injudiciously
censured, and a less satisfactory method by unrestricted arbitrary assumption
given in its place. Bha'scara has retained both.
The next instance, which will be here noticed, is the general solution of in-
determinate problems of the first degree. It was first given among moderns
by Bachet de Meziriac in 1624.* Having shown how the solution of
equations of the form ax—by=c is reduced to ax—by= + \, he proceeds to
resolve this equation: and prescribes the same operation on a and b as to find
the greatest common divisor. He names the residues c, d, e, f, &c. and the
last remainder is necessarily unity : a and b being prime to each other. By
retracing the steps from eipi or^+l (.iccordiug as the number of remainders
is even or odd) e+l=£, sd±i =<?, Jc+l =y, yb±l =p, !3a+ 1 =a
e d c b
or/±l=C, C£+i =«. «</±l f, &c.
/
The last numbers |3 and a will be the smallest values of .i' and y. It is ob-
served, that, if a and b be not prime to each other, the equation cannot
subsist in whole numbers unless c be divisible by the greatest common mea-
sure of a and b.
Here we have precisely the method of the Hindu algebraists, who have
not failed, likewise, to make the last cited observation. See Brahm. Algebra,
Therefore C*-f-D*=(B«+B *=B into «+>=) B*.
The Indian demonstration, with the same symbols, is
B:D::D:>; ^ ,^ g^
B
Therefore B=ii-|-J=C*-|-D» and B'=C'+D'.
B" ¥
' Problfemes plaisans et delectables qui se font par les nombres. 2d Edit. (1624). Lagbange's
additions to Euler's Algebra, ij. 382. (Edit. 1807.)
d
xviii DISSERTATION.
section 1. and Bhdsc. Lil. ch. 12. Vy. ch. 2. It is so prominent in the
Indian Algebra as to give name to the oldest treatise on it extant ; and to
constitute a distinct head in the enumeration of the different branches of
mathematical knowledge in a passage cited from a still more ancient author.
See Lii. § 248.
Confining the comparison of Hindu and modem Algebras to conspicuous
instances, the next for notice is that of the solution of indeterminate pro-
blems of the 2d degree: for which a general method is given by Brahmk-
GUPTA, besides rules for subordinate cases: and two general methods (one of
them the same with Urahmegupta's) besides special cases subservient
however to the universal solution of problems of this nature ; and, to obtain
whole numbers in all circumstances, a combination of the method for pro-
blems of the first degree with that for those of the second, employing them
alternately, or, as the Hindu algebraist terms it, proceeding in a circle.
Bha'scara's second method {Vij. § 80 — 81) for a solution of the problem on
which all indeterminate ones of this degree depend, is exactly the same, which
Lord Brouncker devised to answer a question proposed by way of challenge
by Fermat in 1657. The thing required was a general rule for finding the
innumerable square numbers, which multiplied by a proposed (non-quadrate)
number, and then assuming an unit, will make a square. Lord Brouncker's
rule, putting n for any given number, r" for any square taken at pleasure,
and d for difference between n and r^ (r* c/3 n) was— ir ( ~"Z V J *^^ square
2 r
required. In the Hmdu rule, usmg the same symbols, -j is the square root
required.* But neither Brouncker, nor Wallis, who himself contrived
another method, nor Fkrmat, by whom the question was proposed, but whose
mode of solution was never made known by him, (probably because he had not
found anything better than Wallis and Brouncker discovered,*) nor Fre-
NrcLE, who treated the subject without, however, adding to what had been
done by Wallis and Brouncker,' appear to have been aware of the impor-
tance of the problem and its universal use : a discovery, which, among the
moderns, was reserved for Euler in the middle of the last century. To him,
among the moderns, we owe the remark, which the Hindus had made more
than a thousand years before,* tliat the problem was requisite to find all the
^ ^ yij.-gati.^ 80 ~8\. » Wallis, Alg. c. 98. Mbid.
• ♦ BMscara Vij. § 173, and § 207. See Ifkewise Brahm. Alg. sect. 7.
DISSERTATION. xix
possible solutions of equations of this sort. Lagrange takes credit for
having further advanced the progress of this branch of the indeterminate
analysis, so lately as 1767;' and his complete solution of equations of the
2d degree appeared no earlier than I769.-
It has been pretended, that traces of the art are to be dicovered in the
writings of the Grecian geometers, and particularly in the five first proposi-
tions of Euclid's thirteenth book ; whether, as Wallis conjectures, what
we there have be the work of Theox or some other antient scholiast, rather
than of Euclid himself:^ Also examples of analytic investigation in Pap-
pus ;♦ and indications of a method somewhat of a like nature with algebra,
or at least the effects of it, in the works of Archimedes and Apollonius;
though they are supposed to have very studiously concealed this their art of
invention.'
This proceeds on the ground of considering Analysis and Algebra, as in-
terchangeable terms ; and applying to Algebra Euclid's or Theon's defini-
tion of Analysis, ' a taking of that as granted, which is sought; and thence
by consequences arriving at what is confessedly true.'*
Undoubtedly they possessed a geometrical analysis; hints or traces of
which exist in the writings of more than one Greek mathematician, and
especially in those of Archimedes. But this is very diflFerent from the
Algebraic Calculus. The resemblance extends, at most, to the method of
inversion ; which both Hindus and Arabians consider to be entirely distinct
from their respective Algebras ; and which the former, therefore, join with
their arithmetic and mensuration.^
In a very general sense, the analytic art, as Hin<lu writers observe, is
merely sagacity exercised ; and is independent of symbols, which do not
constitute the art. In a more restricted sense, according to them, it is cal-
culation attended with the manifestation of its principles : and, as they fur-
ther intimate, a method aided by devices, among which symbols and literal
signs are conspicuous.' Defined, as analysis is by an illustrious modern
' Mem. de I'Acad. de Berlin, vol. 24.
* See French translation of Euler's Algebra, Additions, p. 286. And Legetidre Theorie de«
Nombres 1 . § 6. No. 36.
' Wau.i«, Algebra, c, 2. * Ibid, and Preface.
» Ibid, and Nunez Algebra 1)4. * Wallis, following Vibta's version, Alg, c, 1.
' Lil. 3. 1. § 47. KhuUimt. Iliidb. c. 5. » f^V-'g"*- § "0, 1/4, 215, 224.
d 2
XX DISSERTATION.
mathematician,' ' a method of resolving mathematical problems by reducing^
them to equations,' it assuredly is not to be found in the works of any
Grecian writer extant, besides Diophaxtus.
In his treatise the rudiments of Algebra are clearly contained. He deli-
vers in a succinct manner the Algorithm of affirmative and negative quanti-
ties; teaches to form an equation; to transpose the negative terms ; and to
bring out a final simple equation comprising a single term of each species
known and unknown.
Admitting on the ground of the mention of a mathematician of his name,
whose works were commented by Hvpatia about the beginning of the fifth
century f and on the authority of the Arabic annals of an Armenian Chris-
tian;' which make him contemporary with Julian; that he lived towards
the middle of the fourth century of the Christian era; or, to speak with pre-
cision, about the year 360 ;* the Greeks will appear to have possessed in
the fourth century so much of Algebra, as is to be eflfected by dexterous
application of the resolution of equations of the first degree, and even the
second, to limited problems; and to indeterminate also, without, however,
having attained a general solution of problems of this latter class.
The Arabs acquired Algebra extending to simple and compound (meaning
quadratic) equations; but it was confined, so far as appears, to limited pro-
blems of tliose degrees : and they possessed it so early as the close of the
eighth century, or commencement of the ninth. Treatises were at that
period written in the Arabic language on the Algebraic Analysis, by two
distinguished mathematicians who flourished under the Abbasside ALMA'jiu'if r
and the more ancient of the two, Muhaimmed Bf:N Mlsa Al Khuzcdrezmi,
is recognised among the Arabians as the first who made Algebra known to
them. He is the same, who abridged, for the gratification of Alma'mu'n, an
astronomical work taken from the Indian system in the preceding age, under
Almansur. He framed tables likewise, grounded on those of the Hindus;
which he professed to correct. And he studied and connnunicatcd to his
■ D'Alembert. * SuiDAS, in voce Hypatia.
' Gregory Abulfaraj. Ex iis etiain [nempe philosopliis qui prope tempera .Tuliani florue-
runt] Diophantus, cujus liber, quern Algebram vocant, Celebris est, in qnem si imniiserit se Lector,
oceanum hoc in genere reperiet. — Pococke.
* Julian was emperor from SfiO to 363. Sec nuie M.
DISSERTATION. xxi
countrymen the Indian compendious method of computation ; that is, their
arithmetic, and, as is to be inferred, tlieir analytic calculus also.'
The Hindus in the fifth century, perhaps earliei,- were in possession of
Algebra extending to the general solution of both determinate and indeter-
minate problems of the 1st and 2d degrees : and subsequently advanced to
the special solution of biquadratics wanting the second term ; and of cubics
in very restricted and easy cases.
Priority seems then decisive in favour of both Greeks and Hindus against
any pretensions on the part of the Arabians, who in fact, however, prefer
none, as inventors of Algebra. They were avowed borrowers in science:
and, by their own unvaried acknowledgment, from the Hindus they learnt
the science of numbers. That they also received the Hindu Algebra, is
much more probable, than that the same mathematician who studied the
Indian arithmetic and taught it to liis Arabian brethren, should have hit
upon Algebra unaided by any hint or suggestion of the Indian analysis.
The Arabs became accjuainted with the Indian astronomy and numerical
science, before they had any knowledge of the writings of the Grecian as-
tronomers and mathematicians : and it was not until after more than one
century, and nearly two, that they had the benefit of an interpretation of
Diophantus, whether version or paraphrase, executed by Muhammed
Abulwafa Al Buzjani; who added, in a separate form, demonstrations of
the propositions contained in Diophantus; and who was likewise author of
Commentaries on the Algebraic treatises of the Khuwarezviite AIuhammed
BEN Mlsa, and of another Algebraist of less note and later date, Abi Yahva,
whose lectures he had personally attended.' Any inference to be drawn
from their knowledge and study of the Arithmetics of Diophantus and
their seeming adoption of his preparation of equations in their own Algebra,
or at least tlie close resemblance of both on this point, is of no avail against
the direct evidence, with which we arc furnished by them, of previous in-
struction in Algebia and the publication of a treatise on the art, by an author
conversant with the Indian science of computation in all its branches.
But the age of the earliest known Hindu writer on Algebra, not being
with certainty carried to a period anterior, or even quite equal to that in
which DioPHANTLS is on probable grounds placed, the argument of priority,
so far as investigation has yet proceeded, is in favour of Grecian invention.
■ Note N. ^ See note I. ^ See note N.
xxU DISSERTATION.
The Hindus, however, had certainly made distinguished progress in the
science, so early as the century immediately following that in which the
Grecian taught the rudiments of it. The Hindus had the benefit of a good
arithmetical notation : the Greeks, the disadvantage of a bad one. Nearly
allied as algebra is to arithmetic, the invention of the algebraic calculus was
more easy and natural where arithmetic was best handled. No such marked
identity of the Hindu and Diophantine systems is observed, as to demon-
strate communication. They are sufficiently distinct to justify the pre-
sumption, that both might be invented independently of each other.
If, however, it be insisted, that a hint or suggestion, the seed of their know-
ledge, may have reached the Hindu mathematicians immediately from the
Greeks of Alexandria, or mediately through those of Bactria, it must at the
same time be confessed, that a slender germ grew and fructified rapidly, and
soon attained an approved state of maturity in Indian soil.
More will not be here contended for: since it is not inijxjssible, that the hint
of the one analysis may have been actually received by the mathematicians of
the other nation; nor unlikely, considering the arguments which may be
brought for a probable communication on the subject of astrology; and ad-
verting to the intimate connexion between this aud the pure mathematics,
through the medium of astronomy.
The Hindus had undoubtedly made some progress at an early period in
the astronomy cultivated by them for the regulation of time. Their calen-
dar, both civil and religious, was governed chiefly, not exclusively, by the
moon and sun: and the motions of these luminaries were carefully observed
by them: and with such success, that their determination of the moon's
synodical revolution, which was what they were principally concerned with,
is a much more correct one than the Greeks ever achieved.^ They had a
division of the ecliptic into twenty-seven and twenty-eight parts, suggested
evidently by the moon's period in days; and seemingly their own: it was
certainly borrowed by the Arabians." Being led to the observation of the
fixed stars, they obtained a knowledge of the positions of the most remark-
able; and noticed, for religious purposes, and from superstitious notions, the
heliacal rising, with other phoenomena of a few. The adoration of the sun,
of the planets, and of the stars, in common with the worship of the elements,
• As. Res. 2 and 12. * As, Res. 9, Essay vj.
DISSERTATION. xxiii
held a principal place in their religious observances, enjoined by the Vedas:^
and they were led consequently by piety to watch the heavenly bodies.
They were particularly conversant with the most splendid of the primary
planets; the period ot" Jupiter being introduced by them, in conjunction '
with those of the sun and moon, into the regulation of their calendar, sacred
and civil, in the form of the celebrated cycle of sixty years, common to
them and to the Chaldeans, and still retained by them. From that cycle
they advanced by progressive stages, as the Chaldeans likewise did, to larger
periods ; at first by combining that with a number specifically suggested by
other, or more correctly determined, revolutions of the heavenly bodies ; and
afterwards, by merely augmenting the places of figures for greater scope,
(preferring this to the more exact method of combining periods of the
planets by an algebraic process; which they likewise investigated^): until
they arrived finally at the unwieldy cycles named Mahayugas and Calpas.
But it was for the sake of astrology, that they pushed their cultivation of
astronomy, especially that of the minor planets, to the length alluded to.
Now divination, by the relative position of the planets, seems to have been,
in part at least, of a foreign growth, and comparatively recent introduction,
among the Hindus. The belief in the influence of the planets and stars,
upon human affairs, is with them, indeed, remotely antient; and was a
natural consequence of their creed, which made the sun a divine being, and
the planets gods. But the notion, that the tendency of that supposed in- .
fluence, or the manner in which it will be exerted, may be foreseen by man,
and the effect to be produced by it foretold, through a knowledge of the posi-
tion of the planets at a particular moment, is no necessary result of that
creed : for it takes from beings believed divine, free-agency in other respects,
as in their visible movements.
Whatever may have been the period when the notion first obtained, that
foreknowledge of events on earth might be gained by observations of planets
andstais, and by astronomical computation; or wherever that fancy took its
rise; certain it is, that the Hindus have received and welcomed communica-
tions from other nations on topics of astrology: and although they had astro-
logical divinations of their own as early as the days of Paras'aka and
Garoa, centuries before the Christian era, there are yet grounds to presume
' As. Res. 8. * Brahmegupta, Algebra.
xxiv DISSERTATION.
that communications subsequently passed to them on the like subject, either
from the Greeks, or from the same common source (perhaps that of the
Chaldeans) whence the Greeks derived the grosser superstitions engrafted on
their own genuine and antient astrology, which was meteorological.
This opinion is not now suggested for the first time. Former occasions
have been taken of intimating the same sentiment on this point:' and it has
been strengthened by further consideration of the subject. As the question
is closely connected with the topics of this dissertation, reasons for this
opinion will be stated in the subjoined note."
Joining this indication to that of the division of the zodiac into twelve
signs, represented by the same figures of animals, and named by words of the
same import with the zodiacal signs of the Greeks; and taking into consi-
deration the analogy, though not identity, of the Ptolemaic system, or rather
that of HippARCHUs, and the Indian one of excentric deferents and epicycles,
which in both serve to account for the irregularities of the planets, or at least
to compute them, no doubt can be entertained tliatthe Hindus received hints
from the astronomical schools of the Greeks.
It must then be admitted to be at least possible, if not probable, in the
absence of direct evidence and positive proof, that the imperfect algebra of
the Greeks, which had advanced in their hands no further thau the solution
of equations, involving one unknown term, as it is taught by Diophantus,
was made known to the Hindus by their Grecian instructors in improved
astronomy. But, by the ingenuity of the Hindu scholars, the hint was
rendered fruitful, and the algebraic method Avas soon ripened from that slen-
der beginning to the advanced state of a well arranged science, as it was
taught by Auyabhatt'a, and as it is found in treatises compiled by Brah-
MEGUPTA and Bha'scara, of both which versions are here presented to the
public.
» As. Res. 12. ♦ NoU O.
( XXV )
NOTES AND ILLUSTRATIONS.
A.
SCHOLIASTS OF BHASCARA.
The oldest commentary of ascertained date, which has come into the
translator's hands, and has been accordingly employed by him for the pur-
pose of collation, as well as in the progress of translation, is one composed
by Ganga'd'hara son of Gobahd'haxa and grandson of Diva'cara,
inhabitant of Jamhusara} It appears from an example of an astronomical
computation, which it exhibits,* to have been written about the year
1342 Saca (A. D. 1420). Though confined to the Lilavati, it expounds and
consequently authenticates a most material chapter of the Vija-ganita,
which recurs nearly verbatim in both treatises ; but is so essential a part of
the one, as to have given name to the algebraic analysis in the works of the
early writers.' His elder brother ViSHisfu pandita was author of a treatise
of arithmetic, &c. named Ganita-sdra, a title borrowed from the compendium
of Srid'haea. It is frequently quoted by him.
The next commentary in age, and consequent importance for the objects now
under consideration, is that of Su'rya suri also named Su'ryada'sa, native of
Pdrthapura, near the confluence of the Godd and Vidarbhd rivers.* He was
author of a complete commentary on the Sidd hdnta-siromani ; and of a dis-
tinct work on calculation, under the title of Gaiiiia-mdlati ; and of a compi-
lation of astronomical and astrological doctrines, Hindu and Muhammedan,
under the name of Sidd'hdiita-sanhitd-sdra-samuchchaya ; in which he makes
mention of his commentary on the Sirommii. The gloss on the Lilavati, en-
• A town situated in Gujrat (Gurjara), twenty-eight miles north of the town oi Broach,
» Lll. S 264.
^ Cuttac&d'hjj/iya, the title of Braiimegupta's chapter on Algebra, and of a chapter in AarA-
biiatta's work.
.-ft* GOdivari and WtrdL
e
xxvi NOTES AXD ILLUSTRATIONS.
titled Ganitamrita, and that on the Fjja-ganita, named Surya-pracdsa, both
excellent works, containing a clear interpretation of the text, with a concise
explanation of the principles of the rules, are dated the one in 1460, the other
in 1463 iiaca; or A.D. 1538 and 1541. His father JsyA-VAaAJA, son of
Nagaxa't'ha, a Brahmen and astronomer, was author, among other works,
of an astronomical course, under the title of Siddhanta-sundara, still extant,*
which, like the Siddhanta-slromatii, comprises a treatise on algebra. It is
repeatedly cited by his son.
Gaxes'a, son of Ce'sava, a distinguished astronomer, native of Nandi-
grama, near Dfcagiri, (better known by the Muhammedan name of Daule-
tabad)^ was author of a commentary on the Sidi hanta-sirbmani, which is
mentioned by his nephew and scholiast Nrisixha ; in an enumeration of his
Avorks, contained in a passage quoted by Vis'waxaV ha on the Grahalaghara.
His commentary on the Lildvati bears the title of Budd'hhilasini, and date of
1467 ^aca, or A. D. 1545. It comprises a copious exposition of the text,
with demonstrations of the rules : and has been used throughout the trans-
lation as the best interpreter of it He, and his father Ces'ava, and nephew
Nbisixha, as well as his cousin Lacshmi'dasa, were authors of numerous
works both ou astronomy and divination. Tlie most celebrated of his own
performances, the Grahalaghava, bears date 1442 Saca, answering to A. D.
1520.
The want of a commentary by Gaxes'a on the Vija-gaiiita, is supplied
by that of Chishxa, son of Ballala, and pupil of Vishnu, the disciple of
Gaxes'a's nephew Nrisixha. It contains a clear and copious exposition
of the sense, with ample demonstrations of the rules, much in the manner of
Ganesa, on the Lilavati ; whom also he imitated in composing a commen-
tary on that treatise, and occasionally refers to it. His work is entitled
Calpalatavatdra. Its date is determined, at the close of the sixteenth
century of the Christian era, by the notice of it and of the author in a work
of his brother RaxganaVha, dated 1524 Saca (A.D. 1602), as well as in
one by his nephew McnxsVara. He appears to have been astrologer in
the service of the Emperor Jeh a'ngie, who reigned at the beginning of the
seventeenth century.
The gloss of Raxgana't'ha on the Vdsana, or demonstratory annotations
' The astronomical part is in the library of the East India Company.
* Naitdigrim retains its ancient name ; and is situated west of Dauktabad, aboat sixty-five miles.
SCHOLIASTS OF BHASCARA. xxvit
of Bha'scara, which is entitled Mita-bhashini, contains no specification of
date ; but is determined, with sufficient certainty, towards tlie middle of
the sixteenth centun,- of the Saca era, by the writer's relation of son to
Nrisixha, the author of a commentary on the Surya-siddhanta, dated
1542 Saca, and of the Vasand-vdrtica (or gloss on Bha'scara's annotations
of the Siromani), which bears date in \5^3 Saca, or A.D. 1621; and his
relation of brother, as well as pupil, to Camalacara, author of the Siddhdnta-
tatrca-vivica, also composed towards the middle of the same centurj* of
the Saca era. Nrisinha, and his uncle Viswana't'ha, (author of astrolo-
gical commentaries,) describe their connnon ancestor Diva'cara, and his
grandfather Ra'ma, as Maharashtra Brahmens, living at Golagrdma,^ on
the northern bank of the Goddvari, and do not hint a migration of the
family. Nrisixha's own father, Crishn'a, was author of a treatise on
algebra in compendious rules (sutra), as his son affirms.
The Vija-prabodha, a commentary on the Vija-ganita, by Ra'ma Crishva,
son of Lacsuman'a, and grandson of Nrisinha, mhahxtixit oi Amardrati,*
is without date or express indication of its period ; unless his grandfather
Nrisixha be the same with the nephew of Vis'wana't'ha just now men-
tioned: or else identified with the nephew of Gan'e's'a and preceptor of
Vishnu, the instructor of Crishna, author of the Calpalatdvatdra. The
presumption is on either part consistent with proximity of countrj': Amard-
vati not being more than 150 miles distant from Nandlgrdma, nor more than
fiOO from Golagrdma. It is on one side made probable by the author's
frequent reference to a commentary' of his preceptor Crishna, which in
substance corresponds to the Calpalatdvatdra ; but the title differs, for he
cites the Nacdncura. On the other side it is to be remarked, that Crishna,
father of the Nrisinha, who wrote the J 'Vasand-vdrtica, was author of a
a treatise on Algebra, which is mentioned by his son, as before observed.
The Manbratijana, another com men tar}' on the Lildvati, which has b^n
used in the progress of the translation, bears no date, nor any indication'
whatsoever of the period when the author Ra'ma-Crishna deta, son 6f
Sada'deva, sumamed Apadeva, wrote. '^
The Ganila-caumudi, on the LUdvati, is frequently cited by the modertf
..,;;iiii
■ G6Ig&m of the maps, in Ut. 18<» N. long. 78° E. ^ ^„ ^^^^ ,,„^
* A great commercial town in Berdr. _ , -%.■,,.
^ .cj ill ti'jj.i jb STD ^nti}ul3m
xxviii NOTES AND ILLUSTRATIONS.
commentators, and in particular by Su'rya-subi and Rangana't'ha : but
has not been recovered, and is only known from their quotations.
Of the numerous commentaries on the astronomical portion of Bha'scara's
Sidd'hdnta-sirSmani, little use having been here made, either for settling the
text of the algebraic and arithmetical treatises of the author, or for interpreting
particular passages of them, a reference to two commentaries of this class,
besides those of Su'rya-suri and Gane's'a, (which have not been recovered,)
and the author's own annotations and the interpretation of them by
Nrisinha above noticed, may suffice: viz. the Gatiita-taiwa-chintmnani, by
Lacshmi'da'sa, grandson of Ce'sava, (probably the same with the father of
Gane's'a before mentioned,) and son of Va'chespati, dated liQ3 Saca, (A.D.
1501); and the Mdricha, by Muxis'wara, surnamed Vis'warupa, grandson
of Balla'la, and son of Rangana't'ha, who was compiler of a work dated
1524 Haca (A.D. 1602), as before mentioned. Muni's'wara himself is the
author of a distinct treatise of astronomy entitled Sidd'kdnta-sdrvabhau?>ia.
Persian versions of both the Lildvati and Vija-ganita have been already
noticed, as also contributing to the authentication of the text. The first by
Faizi, undertaken by the command of the Emperor Acber, was executed in
the 32d year of his reign; A. H. 995, A.D. 1587. The translation of the
V'lja-ganita is later by half a century, having been completed by Ata Ullah
Rashi'di, in the 8th year of the reign of Siia'h Jeha'x ; A. II. 1044, A.D.
1634.
B.
ASTRONOMY OF BRAHMEGUPTA.
Brahmegupta's entire work comprises twenty-one lectures or chapters ;
of which the ten first contain an astronomical system, consisting (1st and 2d)
in the computation of mean motions and true places of the planets ; 3d,
solution of problems concerning time, the points of the horizon, and the
position of places; 4th and 5th, calculation of lunar and solar eclipses; 6th,
rising and setting of the planets ; 7th, position of the moon's cusps ; 8th,
observation of altitudes by the gnomon ; 9th, conjunctions of the planets ;
and, 10th, their conjunction with stars. The next ten are supplementary,
including five chapters of problems with their solutions : and the twenty-
BRAHMEGUPTA'S ASTRONOMY. xxix
first explains the principles of the astronomical system in a compendious
treatise on spherics, treating of the astronomical sphere and its circles, the
construction of sines, the rectification of the apparent planet from mean
motions, the cause of lunar and solar eclipses, and the construction of the
sirmillary sphere.
The copy of the scholia and text, in the translator's possession, wants the
whole of the 6th, 7th, and 8th chapters, and exhibits gaps of more or less
extent in the preceding five ; and appears to have been transcribed from an
exemplar equally defective. From the middle of the 9th, to near the close of
the 15th chapters, is an uninterrupted and regular series, comprehending a very
curious chapter, the 11th, which contains a revision and censure of earlier
writers : and next to it the chapter on arithmetic and mensuration, which is
the 1 2th of the work. It is followed in the 1 3th, and four succeeding chapters,
by solutions of problems concerning mean and true motions of planets, find-
ing of time, place, and points in the horizon ; and relative to other matters,
which the defect of the two last of five chapters renders it impracticable to
specify. Next comes, (but in a separate form, being transcribed from a diff^e-
rent exemplar,) the 1 8th chapter on Algebra. The two, which should succeed,
(and one of which, as appears from a reference to a chapter on this subject,
treats of the various measures of time under the several denominations of
solar, siderial, lunar, &c. ; and the other, from like references to it, is known
to treat of the delineation of celestial phoenomena by diagram,) are entirely-
wanting, the remainder of the copy being defective. The twenty-first
chapter, however, which is last in the author's arrangement, (as the corre-
sponding book on spherics of Bhascaka's Siddh&nta-siromaiii is in his,)
has been transposed and first expounded by the scholiast : and very properly
so, since its subject is naturally preliminary, being explanatory of the prin-
ciples of astronomy. It stands first in the copy under consideration ; and is
complete, except one or two initial couplets.
xxx NOTES AND ILLUSTRATIONS.
c.
BRAHMA-SIDD'HANTA, TITLE OF BRAHMEGUPTA'S
ASTRONOMY.
The passage is this: " TSn\ui.i6cta-graha-ganitam mahatd caUna yat
c'hili-bhutam, abhid'hiyate sphutan tat Jisn^u-suta Brahmegupte'na."
' The computation of planets, taught by Brahma, which had become im-
pei-fect by great length of time, is propounded correct by Brahmegupta son
of Jishn'u.'
The beginning of PRfr'nuDACA's commentary on the Brahma-sidd'hanta,
where the three initial couplets of the text are expounded, being deficient,
the quotation cannot at present be brought to the test of collation. But the
title is still more expressly given near the close of the eleventh chapter,
(§ 59) " Brdhme sphuta-sidd'hanti ravindu-bhd y6gam, &c."
And again, (§ 60 " Chandra-rcevigrahanindu-cJihdyadishu sarvada yatb
Brahmt, drig-ganitaicyam bhavati, sphut'd-sidd'hantas tat 6 Brahmah."
* As observation and computation always agree in respect of lunar and solar
eclipses, moon's shadow (i. e. altitude) and other particulars, according to
the Brahma, therefore is the Brahma a correct system, (sphuia-siddlianta) .^
It appears from the purport of these several passages compared, that
Brahmegupta's treatise is an emendation of an earlier system, (bearing the
same name of Brahma-sidd'hdnta, or an equivalent title, as Pitdmaha-
sidd'hanta, or adjectively Paitdmaha,) which had ceased to agree with
the phoenomena, and into which requisite corrections were therefore intio-
duced by him to reconcile computation and observation ; and he entitled his
amended treatise ' Correct Brahma-sidd'hdnta.' That earlier treatise is con-
sidered to be the identical one which is introduced into the Vishnu-dlierm6t-
tara purdna, and from which parallel passages are accordingly cited by the
scholiasts of Bha'scara. (See following note.) It is no doubt the same
which is noticed by Vara'hamihira under the title oi Paitdmaha ^nd Brahma
siddhanta. Couplets, which are cited by his commentator Bh at'totpala from
the Brahma-siddlidnta, are found in Brahmegupta's work. But whether
the original or the amended treatise be the one to which the scholiast re-
ferred, is nevertheless a disputable point, as the couplets in question may be
among passages which Brahmegupta retained unaltered.
NOTES AND ILLUSTRATIONS. xxxi
D.
VERIFICATION OF THE TEXT OF BRAHMEGUPTA'S
TREATISE OF ASTRONOMY.
A PASSAGE, referring the commencement of astronomical periods and of
planetary revolutions, to the supposed instant of the creation, is quoted from
Brahmegupta, with a parallel passage of another Brahma siddhanta
(comprehended in the Vishnu-dhermottara-purdna) in a compilation by
MunisVara one of Bha'scara's glossators.' It is verified as the 4th couplet
of Braumegupta's first chapter (upon mean motions) in the translator's copy.
Seven couplets, specifying the mean motions of the planets' nodes and
apogees, are quoted after the parallel passage of the other Brahma sidd'hdnta,
by the same scholiast of Bha'scara, as the text of Brahmegupta : and they
are found in the same order from the 15th to the 21st in the first chapter of
his work in the copy above mentioned.
This commentator, among many other corresponding passages noticed by
him on various occasions, has quoted one from the same Bralnna sidd'hdnta of
the Kishriu-dharmottara concerning the orbits of the planets deduced from the
magnitude of the sky computed there, as it also is by Brahmegupta (ch. 21,
§9), but in other words, at a circumference of 1871206y200000000 yojanas :
he goes on to quote the subsequent couplet of Brahmegupta declaring that
planets travel an equal measured distance in their orbits in equal times : and
then cites his scholiast (ticacdra) Chaturve'da'cha'rya,
The text of Brahmegupta (ch. 1, §21) specifying the diurnal revolutions
of the siderial sphere, or number of siderial days in a calpa, with the corre-,
spontlent one of the Paitdmaha sidd'hdnta in the Vishiu-dherrndttara, is ano-
ther of the quotations of the same writer in his commentary on Bha'scara.
A passage relating to oval epicycles," cited by the same author in another
place, is also verified in the 2d chapter (in the rectification of a planet's place).
A number of couplets on the subject of eclipses' is cited by Lacshmida'sa',
a commentator of Bha'scara. They are found in the 5th chapter (on
eclipses) § 10 and 24 ; and in a section of the 2 1st (on the cause of eclipses)
§ 37 to 46, in the copy in question.
Several couplets, relating to the positions of the constellations and to the
' As. Res. 12, p. 232. « Ibid. 12, p. 236. * Ibid. 12, p. 2«.
xxxii NOTES AND ILLUSTRATIONS.
longitudes and latitudes of principal fixt stars, are cited from Bkahmeoupta
in numerous compilations, and specifically in the commentaries on the Surya-
sidd'hanta and Sidd^hanta-sirdmani.'^ They are all found correct in the 10th
chapter, on the conjunctions of planets with fixt stars.
A quotation hy Gan js's'a on the LHdvati (A. D. 1545) describing the attain-
ments of a true mathematician,* occurs with exactness as the first couplet of
the 12th chapter, on arithmetic; and one adduced by Bua'scara himself, in
his arithmetical treatise (§ 190), giving a rule for finding the diagonal of a
trapezium,' is precisely the 28th of the same chapter.
A very important passage, noticed by Bha'scara in his notes on his
Sidd'hanta-siromani, and alluded to in his text, and fully quoted by his com-
mentator in the Markka, relative to the rectification of a planet's true place
from the mean motions,* is found in the 21st chapter, § 27. Bha'scara has,
on that occasion, alluded to the scholiast, who is accordingly quoted byname
in the commentary of Lacshmi'da'sa (A. D. 1501) : and here again the cor-
respondence is exact.
The identity of the text as Brahmegupta's, and of the gloss as his scho-
liast's, being (by these and many other instances, which have been collated,)
satisfactorily established ; as the genuineness of the text is by numerous quo-
tations from the Brahma-siddhanta (without the author's name) in the more
ancient commentary of Bhat'totpala (A. D. 968) on the works of Vara'ha-
wiHiRA, which also have been verified in the mutilated copy of the Brahma-
sidd'hanta under consideration ; the next step was the exainination of the
detached copy of a commentary on the 18th chapter, upon Algebra, Avhich is
terminated by a colophon so describing it, and specifying the title of the entire
book Brahma-sidd'' hdnta, and the name of its author Brahmegupta.
For this purpose materials are happily presented in the scholiast's enume-
ration, at the close of the chapter on arithmetic, of the topics treated by his
author in the chapter on Algebra, entitled Cutiaca :' in a general reference
to the author's algorithm of unknown quantities, affirmative and negative
terms, cipher and surd roots, in the same chapter ;* and the same scholiast's
quotations of the initial words of four rules; one of them relative to surd
roots ;^ the other three regarding the resolution of quadratic equations ;* aa
' > As. Res. 9. Essay 6. 2 Lil. ch. 11. *" Lit. § 190.
♦ As. Res. 12, 239. ' Arithra. of Brahm. § 66. • Ibid. § 13.
' Ibid, § 39. • Ibid. § 15 & 18.
NOTES AND ILLUSTRATIONS. xxxiii
also in the references of the schoHast of the Algebraic treatise to passages in
the astronomical part of his author's work.*
The quotations have been verified; and they exactly agree with the rule
concerning surds (§ 26) and the three rules which compose the section relating
to quadratic equations (§ 32 — 34) ; and with the rule in the chapter on the
solution of astronomical problems concerning mean motions (ch. 13, § 22) :
and this verification and the agreement of the more general references
demonstrate the identity of this treatise of Algebra, consonantly to its colo-
phon, as Brahmegupta's Algebra entitled Cuttaca and a part of his
Brahma-sidd'hdnta.
E.
CHRONOLOGY OF ASTRONOMICAL AUTHORITIES ACCORD-
ING TO ASTRONOMERS OF UJJAYANL
The names of astronomical writers with their dates, as furnished by the
astronomers of Ujjayani who were consulted by Dr. William Hunter so-
journing there with a British embassy, are the following:
Vaka'ha-mihira
122 Saca
[A. D. 200-lX
Another Vara'ha-mihira
427
[A. D. 505-6]
Brahmegupta
550
[A. D. 628-9]
Munja'la
854.
[A.D. 932-3]
Bhat'totpala
890
[A. D. 1068-9]
Swe't6tpala
939
[A. D. 1017-8]
Varun'a-bhatt'a
962
[A. D. 1040-1]
Bh6ja-raja
964
[A. D. 1042-3]
Bha'scara
1072
[A. D. 1 150-1]
Calyana-chandra
1101
[A.D. 11 79-80]
The grounds, on which this chronology proceeds, are unexplained in the
note which Dr. Hunter preserved of the communication. But means exist
for verifying two of the dates specified and corroborating others.
Tliedate, assigned to Bha'scara, is precisely that of his 5i</rf'A««/«-i/>o»2fl!«'i,
plainly concluded from a passage of it, in which he declares, that it was
• Alg. of Brahm. § S6 (Rule 55).
f
I
xxxiv NOTES AND Ii>tUSJRATIONS.
completed by him, being thirty-six years of age ; and that his birth was in
1036 Saca.
Rajd Bh6ja-deva, or Bh6ja-iia'ja, is placed in this list of Hindu astrono-
mers apparently on account of his name being affixed as that of the author,
to an astrological treatise on the calendar, which bears the title of Rdja-
m&rtanda, and which was composed probably at his court and by astrologers
in his service. It contains no date ; or at least none is found in the copy
which has been inspected. But the age assigned to the prince is not incon-
sistent with Indian History : and is supported by the colophon of a poem
entitled Subh6shita ratna-sandoha, composed by a Jia/wa sectary named Amita-
GATi who has given the date of his poem in 1050 oi Vicramaditya, in the
reign of Munja. Now Munja was uncle and predecessor of Bh6ja-ka'ja,
being regent, with the title of sovereign, during his nephew's minority : and
this date, which answers to A. D. 993-4, is entirely consistent with that given
by the astronomers of UJjayani, viz. 964 Saca corresponding to A. D. 1042-3 :
fpr the reign of Bk6j a-de'va was long : extending, at the lowest computation,
to half a centur}', and reaching, according to an extravagant reckoning, to the
round number of an hundred years.
The historical notices of this King of Dhdrd * are examined by Major
WiLFORD and Mr. Bentley in the 9th and 8th volumes of Asiatic Researches r
and they refer him to the tenth century of the Christian era ; the one making
him ascend the throne in A. D. 982 ; the other, in A. D. 913. The former,
which takes his reign at an entire century, including of course his minority,
or the period of the administration, reign, or regency, of his uncle Munja, is
compatible with the date of Amitagati's poem (A. D. 993) and with that of
the Rdja-ynartarida or other astrological and astronomical works ascribed to
him (A. D. 1042) according to the chronology of the astronomers of Ujjayani.
The age, assigned to Buahmegupta, is corroborated by the arguments
adduced in the text. That, given to Munja'la, is consistent with the quota-
tion of him as at the head of a tribe of authors, by Bua'scara at the distance
of two centuries. The period allotted to Vara'hamiuira, that is, to the
second and most celebrated of the name, also admits corroboration. This
point, however, being specially important, to the history of Indian astronomy,
and collaterally to that of the Hindu Algebra, deserves and will receive a
full and distinct consideration.
' The modern Dhar. Wilford. As. Res.
NOTES AND ILLUSTRATIONS. xxxv
F. -^
AGE OF BRAHMEGUPTA INFERRED FROM ASTRONOMI-
CAL DATA.
The star Chitra, which unquestionably is Spica Virginis,^ was referred by
BuAHMEGUPTA to the 103d degree counted from its origin to the inter-
section of the star's circle of declination j*' whence the star's right ascension is
deduced 182° 45'. Its actual right ascension in A. D. 1800 was 198° 40' 2".*
The difference, \5° 55' 2", is the quantity, by which the beginning of the first
zodiacal asterism and lunar mansion, Aswini, as inferible from the position of
the star Chitra, has receded from the equinox: and it indicates the lapse of
1216 years (to A. D. 1800,) since that point coincided with the equinox; the
annual precession of the star being reckoned at 47', H-f
The star Revati, which appears to be ^ Piscium,' had no longitude, accord-
ing to the same author, being situated precisely at the close of the asterism
and commencement of the following one, Aswini, Avithout latitude or decli-
nation, exactly in the equinoctial point. Its actual right ascension in
1800 was 15° 49' 15".* This, which is the quantity by which the origin of
the Indian ecliptic, as inferible from the position of the star RSvatt, has re-
ceded from the equinox, indicates a period of 1221 years, elapsed to the end
of the eighteenth century ; the annual precession for that star being 46", 63.^
The mean of the two is 1218-1^ years; which, taken from 1800, leave 581
or 582 of the Christian era. Brahmegupta then appears to have observed
and written towards the close of the sixth, or the beginning of the following
century; for, as the Hindu astronomers seem not to have been very accurate
observers, the belief of his having lived and published in the seventh
century, about A. D. 628, which answers to 550 Saca, the date assigned
to him by the astronomers of Ujjayani, is not inconsistent with the position,
that the vernal equinox did not sensibly to his view deviate from the begin-
• As. Res. vol.9, p. 339. (8vo.)
* Ibid. 9, 327, (8vo.), and 12, p. 240.
• Zach's Tables for 1800 deduced from Ma»kelyne'« Catalogue.
t Maskelyne's Caulogue: the mean precession of the equinoctial points being recijoncd 50", 3,
* As. Reg. 9, p. 346. (8vo.) « Zachs Tables. ' Zach's Tables. .^ ,
f2
xxxvi NOTES AND ILLUSTRATIONS.
ning of Aries or MSsha, as determined by him from the star Rkvati
(^ Piscium) which he places at that point.
The same author assigns to Agastya or Canopus a distance of 87°, and to
Lubd'haca or Sirius 86°, from the beginning of Misha. From these positions
a mean of 1280 years is deducible.
The passage in which this author denies the precession of the colures, as
well as the comment of his scholiast on it, being material to the present
argument, they are here subjoined in a literal version.
' The very fewest hours of night occur at the end of Mit'huna; and the
seasons are governed by the sun's motion. Therefore the pair of solstices
appears to be stationary, by the evidence of a pair of eyes.'*
Scholia: ' What is said by Vishnu Chandra at the beginning of the
chapter on thcyuga of the solstice: (" Its revolutions through the asterisms
are here [in the calpd] a hundred and eighty-nine thousand, four hundred and
eleven. This is termed a yuga of the solstice, as of old admitted by Brahma,
AucA, and the rest.") is wrong: for the very fewest hours of night to us
occur when the sun's place is at the end of Mit'huna [Gemini]; and of
course the very utmost hours of day are at the same period. From that limi-
tary point, the sun's progress regulates the seasons; namely, the cold season
(sisira) and the rest, comprising two months each, reckoned from Macara
[Capricorn]. Therefore what has been said concerning the motion of the
limitary point is wrong, being contradicted by actual observation of days
and nights.
' The objection, however, is not valid: for now the greatest decrease and
increase of night and day do not happen when the sun's place is at the end of
Mit'huna: and passages are remembered, expressing " The southern road of
the sun was from the middle of Aslesha; and the northern one at the be-
ginning of Dhanishfhaf" and others [of like import]. But all this only
proves, that there is a motion; not that the solstice has made many revolu-
tions through the asterisms.''
It was hinted at the beginning of this note, tliat Brahmegupta's longi-
tude (dhruvaca) of a star is the arc of the ecliptic intercepted by the star's
circle of declination, and counted from the origin of the ecliptic at the be-
' Brahma-sidd'Mnta, 1 1 , § 54.
*This quotation is from Vara'ha-miuira's sanhitd, cb, 3, § 1 and 2.
* Prit'hu'daca swami ciiaturveda on Brahm.
i
AGE OF BRAHMEGUPTA. xxxvii
ginning of Meshd; as his latitude (vicshepa) of a star is the star's distance
on a circle of declination from its point of intersection with the ecliptic. In
short, he, like other Hindu astronomers, counts longitude and latitude of stars
by the intersection of circles of declination with the ecliptic. The subject
had been before noticed.* To make it more clear, an instance may be taken:
and that of the scholiast's computation of the zenith distance and meridian
altitude of Canopus for the latitude of Canyacubja (Canouj) may serve as an
apposite example.
From the vicshepa of the star Agastya, 77°, he subtracts the declination of
the intersected point of the ecliptic 23° 58'; to the remainder, which is the
declination of the star, 53° 2', he adds the latitude of the place 26° S5':, the
sum, 79° 37', is the zenith distance; and its complement to ninety degrees,
10" 23', is the meridian altitude of the star.'^
The annual variation of the star in declination, l", 7, is too small to draw
any inference as to the age of the scholiast from the declination here stated.
More especially as it is taken from data furnished by his author; and as he
appears to have been, like most of the Hindu astronomers, no very accurate
observer; the latitude assigned by him to the city, in which he dwelt, being
no less than half a degree wrong: for the ruins of the city o^ Canouj are in
27° 5' N.
G.
ARYABHAffA'S DOCTRINE.
Aryabhatta was author of the Aryashiasata (800 couplets) and Dasagi-
tica (ten stanzas), known by the numerous quotations of Brahmegupta,
Bhat't6tpala, and others, who cite both under these respective titles. The
laghu Arya-sidd'hanta, as a work of the same author, and, perhaps, one of
those above-mentioned, is several times quoted by Bha'scara's commentator
MuNi's'wARA. He likewise treated of Algebra, &c. under the distinct heads
of Cuitaca, a problem serving for the resolution of indeterminate ones, and
Vija principle of computation, or analysis in general. — LU. c. 1 1.
■ As. Res. 9, p. 327- (8vo.), and 12, p. 240 ; (4to.)
^ Peit'iiu'daca swAiif on Brahm. ch. 10, i 35.
xxxvHi NOTES AND ILLUSTRATIONS.
From the quotations of writers on astronomy, and particularly of Brahme-
CUPTA, who in many instances cites Aryabhat't'a to controvert his positions,
(and is in general contradicted in his censure by his own scholiast PriVhu-
DACA, cither correcting his quotations, or vindicating the doctrine of the
earlier author), it appears, that Aryabhatta affirmed the diurnal revolution
of the earth on its axis; and that he accounted for it by a wind or current of
aerial fluid, the extent of which, accoitiing to the orbit assigned to it by him,
corresponds to an elevation of little more than a hundred miles from the sur-
face of the earth ; that he possessed the true theory of the causes of lunar and
solar eclipses, and disregarded the imaginary dark planets of the mythologists
and astrologers; affirming the moon and primary planets (and even the stars)
to be essentially dark, and only illumined by the sun : that he noticed the
motion of the solstitial and equinoctial points, but restricted it to a regulai'
oscillation, of which he assigned the limit and the period : that he ascribed
to the epicycles, by which the motion of a planet is represented, a form
varying from the circle and nearly elliptic : that he recognised a motion of
the nodes and apsides of all the primary planets, as well as of the moon;
though in this instance, as in some others, his censurer imputes to him
variance of doctrine.
The magnitude of the earth, and extent of the encompassing wind, is
among the instances wherein he is reproached by Brahmegupta with ver-
satility, as not having adhered to the same position throughout his writings;
but he is vindicated on this, as on most occasions, by the scholiast of his cen-
surer. Particulars of this question, leading to rather curious matter, deserve
notice.
Aryabhatt'a's text specifies the earth's diameter, \050 yojanas ; and the
orbit or circumference of the earth's wind [spiritus vector] 3393 yojanas;
which, as the scholiast rightly argues, is no discrepancy. The diameter of
this orbit, according to the remark of Brahmegupta, is 1080.
On this, it is to be in the first place observed, that the proportion of the
circumference to the diameter of a circle, here employed, is that of 22 to 7;
which, not being the same which is given by Brahmegupta 's rule, (Aritlmit
§ 40,) must be presumed to be that, which Aryabhat'ta taught. Applying
it to the earth's diameter as by him assigned, viz. 1050, the circumference of
the earth is 3300; which evidently constitutes the dimensions by him in-
ARYABHATTA'S DOCTRINE. xxxix
tended : and that number is accordingly stated by a commentator of Bha's-
CARA. See Gaii. on Lil. § 4.
This approximation to the proportion of the diameter of a circle to its
periphery, is nearer than that which both Brahmegupta and Sri'd'hara,
though later writers, teach in their mensuration, and which is employed in
the Surya-siddhdnta; namely, one to the square-root often. It is adopted
by Bha'scara, who adds, apparently from some other authority, the still
nearer approximation of 1250 to 3927- — {Lil. § 201.)
Aryabhat't'a appears, however, to have also made use of the ratio which
afterwards contented both Brahmegupta and Sri'd'hara; for his rule ad^
duced by Gan'e's'a (Zz/. § 207) for finding the arc from the chord and versed
sine, is clearly founded on the proportion of the diameter to the periphery,
as one to the square root of ten: as will be evident, if the semicircle be com-
puted by that rule: for it comes out the square root of'-/, the diameter
being 1.
A more favourable notion of his proficiency in geometry, a science, how-
ever, much less cultivated by the Hindus than Algebra, may be received from
his acquaintance with the theorem containing the fundamental property of
the circle, which is cited by PkiVhu'daca. — {Bi^ahm. 12, §21.)
The number of 3300 ybjanas for the circumference of the earth, or Q\
ybjanas for a degree of a great circle, is not very wide of the truth, and is,
indeed, a very near approach, if the ydjana, which contains four crSsas, be
rightly inferred from the modern computed crosa found to be 1, 9 B. M.'
For, at that rate of 7, 6 miles to a yojana, the earth's circumference would be
25080 B. miles.
Tlie difference between the diameter of the earth, and that of its air (vayu),
by which term Aryabhat'ta seems to intend a current of wind whirling as a
vortex, and causing the earth's revolution on its axis, leaves 15 yojanas, or
1 14 miles, for the limit of elevation of this atmospheric current.
■ As. Res. 5. 105. (Svo.)
jd NOTES AND ILLUSTRATIONS.
H.
SCANTINESS OF THE ADDITIONS BV LATER WRITERS ON
ALGEBRA.
i The observation in the text on the scantiness of the improvements or ad-
flitions made to the Algebra of the Hindus in a long period of years after
Aeyabhatta probably, and after Brahmegupta certainly, is extended to
authors whose works are now lost, on the faith of quotations from them.
Srid'hara's rule, which is cited by Bha'scaua {Vij.-gaii. § 131) concerning
quadratics, is the same in substance with one of Brahmegupta's (Ch. 18.
§32 — 33). Padmana'bha, indeed, appears from the quotation from his treatise
{V'y.-gan. § 142.) to have been aware of quadratic equations aifordiug two
roots; which Brahmegupta has not noticed; and this is a material acces-
sion which the science received. There remains an uncertainty respecting
the author, from whom Bha'scara has taken the resolution of equations of
tlie third and fourth degrees in their simple and unaffected cases.
The only names of Algebraists, who preceded Bha'scara, to be added to
those already mentioned, are 1st aw earlier writer of the same name (Bha's-
cara) who was at the head of the commentators of Aryabhatt'a ; and 2d,
the elder scholiast of the Brahma-sidd'h&nta, named Bhatta Balabhadra.
Both are repeatedly cited by the successor of the latter in the same task of
exposition, PriVhu'daca Swa'mi; who was himself anterior to the author of
the Siromani; being more than once quoted by him. As neither of those
earlier commentators is named by the younger Bha'scara; nor any intima-
tion given of his having consulted and employed other treatises besides the
three specified by him, in the compilation of the Vija-ganita, it is presumable,
that the few additions, which a comparison with the Cuttaca of Brahme-
gupta exhibits, are properly ascribable either to Sri'd'hara or to Padma-
va'bha : most likely to the latter ; as he is cited for one such addition ;' and
as Srid'hara's treatise of arithmetic and mensuration, which is extant, is
not seemingly the work of an author improving on the labours of those
who went before him.* The corrections and improvements introduced by
Bha'scara himself, and of which he carefully apprizes his readers,' are not
very numerous, nor in general important.*
• Vy-gan. § 142. » Lil. § 147. Brahm. 12, § 21 and 40. Gan. Sar. § 126.
' ^'U'-gci' before § 44, and after § 57. also Cb. 1, towards the end; and Ch. 5. § 142.
* Unless Lil. § 170 and 190.
NOTES AND ILLUSTRATIONS. xli
I.
AGE OF ARYABHATTA.
LENDER the Abbasside Khalifs Almansu'k and Almamux, in the middle
of the eighth and beginning of the ninth centuries of the Christian era, tlie
Arabs became conversant with the Indian astronomy. It was at that period,
as may be presumed, that they obtained information of the existence and
currency of three astronomical systems among the Indians ;' one of which
bore the name of Aryabhatt'a, or, as written in Arabic. characters, Arja-
BAHAR,* (perhaps intended for Akjabhar) which is as near an approxima-
tion as the difference of characters can be expected to exhibit. This then
unquestionably was the system of the astronomer whose age is now to be
investigated ; and who is in a thousand places cited by Hindu writers on
Astronomy, as author of a system and founder of a sect in this science. It
is inferred from the acquaintance of the Arabs with the astronomical attain-
ments of the Hindus, at that time, when the court of the Khalif drew the
visit of a Hindu astrologer and mathematician, and when the Indian deter-
mination of the mean motions of the planets was made the basis of astrono-
mical tables compiled by order of the Khalifs, ' for a guide in matters per-
taining to the stars,' and when Indian treatises on the science of numbers
were put in an Arabic dress j adverting also to the difficulty of obtaining
further insight into the Indian sciences, which the author of the Tdrikhul
hukmd complains of, assigning for the cause the distance of countries, and
the various impediments to intercourse : it is inferred, we say, from these,
joined to other considerations, that the period in question was that in which
the name of Aryabhatta was introduced to the knowledge of the Arabs.
This, as a first step in inquiring the antiquity of this author, ascertains his
celebrity as an astronomical authority above a thousand years ago.
He is repeatedly named by Hindu authors of a still earlier date: particu-
larly by Brahmegupta, in the first part of the seventh century of the Chris-
tian era. He had been copied by writers whom Brahmegupta cites.
Vara'ha-mihira has allusions to him, or employs his astronomical determi-
' Tar'Mu'l huhma, or Bibl. Arab. Phil, quoted by Casiri : Bibl. Arab. Hisp. 426. See below,
Note M. : f 1 , 1
* CossALi's Argebahr is a misprint (Orig. &c. dell' Alg. i. 207). Casiri gives, as in the Arabic,
Argebahr: \^bicb, in the orthography here followed, is Arjabahr.
or
3
atlii NOTES AND ILLUSTRATIONS.
nations in an astrological work at the beginning of the sixth centurj'. These
facts will be further weighed upon as wc proceed.
For determining Aryabhatta's age with the greater precision of astro-
nomical chronology, grounds are presented, at the first view promising, but
on examination insufficient.
In the investigation of the question upon astronomical grounds, recourse
was in the first place had to his doctrine concerning the precession of the
equinoxes. As quoted by Munis'wara, a scholiast of Bha'scaua, he main-
tained an oscillation of the equinoctial points to twenty-four degrees on
either sidej and he reckoned 578159 such librations in a calpa.^ From ano-
ther passage cited by BnATT6TPAi.A on Vaba'ha-mihira,* his position of the
mean equinoxes was the beginning of Aries and of Libra.' From one more
passage quoted by the scholiast of Brahmegupta,* it further appears, that
he reckoned 1986120000 years expired' before the war of the Bhdrata: and
the duration of the Culpa, if he be rightly quoted by Brahmegupta,* is
1008 quadruple 3/M^fl« of 4320000 years each.
From these data it follows that according to him, the equinoctial point
had completed 9.65699 oscillations at the epoch of the war of the Bhuraia.
But we are without any information as to the progress made in the current
oscillation when he wrote ; or the actual distance of the equinox from the
beginning of Mesha : the position of which, also, as by him received, is
uncertain.
His limit of the motion in trepidation, 24°, was evidently suggested to him
^by the former position of the colurcs declared by Pa'ra'sa'ra ; the exact dif-
ference being 23° 20'. But the commencement of Pa'ra'sa'ra's Aslesha, in
'his sphere, or the origin of his siderial Mesha, are unascertained. Whether
his notions of the duodecimal division of the Zodiac were taken from the
Grecian or Egyptian spheres, or from what other immediate source, is but
matter of conjecture.
Quotations of this author furnish the revolutions of Jupiter in a yuga^
and of Saturn's aphelion in a Calpa f and those of the moon in the latter
' As. Res. 12. 213. * Vrihat-sanhifii. 2.
' ' From the beginning of Mesha to the end of Cani/d (Virgo), the half the ecliptic passes througU
the north. From the beginning of Tula to the end of (the fishes) Mina, the remaining half passes
by the south.'
♦ Prit'hu'daca on Brahm. c. 1. § 10 and 30. c. 11. § 4.
' Six menus, twenty-seven i/vgas and three quarters. * PrT'i-'hu'daca on Brahm. c. 1. § 12.
^ As. Res. 3. 215. » Mun. on Bhds. c. 1. § 33.
• AGE OF A'RYABHATTA. ' ' xliii
period: but the same passage,' in which the number of lunar revolutions in
that great period are given, supplies those of the sun ; namely 4320000000 ;
diflfering from the duration of the Calpa according to this author as cited by
more ancient compilers. The truth is, as appears from another quotation,*
that Aryabhatta, after delivering one complete astronomical system, pro-
ceeds in a second and distinct chapter to deliver another and different one as
the doctrine of Paras' ara ; whose authority, he observes, prevails in the Call
age: and though he seems to indicate the Calpa as the same in both, he also
•hints that in one a deduction is made for the time employed in creation ; and
we have seen, that the duration of the Calpa differs in the quotations of
compilers from this author. '.'i
The ground then being insufficient, until a more definitive knowledge of
either system, as developed by him, be recovered, to support any positive
conclusion, recourse must be had, on failure of precise proof, to more loose
presumption. It is to be observed, that he does not use the Saca or Sambat of
Vicrama'ditta, nor the Saca era of Sa'liva'hana : but exclusively employs
the epoch of the war of the Bharata, which is the era of Yudhisiit'hjra
and the same with the commencement of the Call yuga. Hence it is to be
argued, that he flourished before this era was superseded by the introduction
of the modern epochas. Vara'ha-mihira, on the other hand, does employ
the 6'aca, termed by him Saca-bhupa-cala and Sacendra-cala : which the old
scholiast interprets " the time when the barbarian kings called Saca were
discomfited by Vicrama'ditya :"' and Brahmegupta uses the modern Saca
era; which he expresses by Saca-nr1pant6, interpreted by the scholiast of
Bha'scara " the end [of the life or reign] of Vicrama'ditya who slew a
people of barbarians named Sacas." Vara'ha-mihira's epoch of Saca ap-
pears to have been understood by his scholiast Bhatt'6tpala to be the same
with the era of Vicrama'ditya, which now is usually called aSj/wz^^^; and
which is reckoned to commence after 3044 years of the Call age were ex-
pired: and Brahmegupta's epoch of Saca is the era of Sa'liva'hana begin-
ning at the expiration of 31/9 years of the Cali yuga : and accordingly this
number is specified in his Brahma-siddhan'ta. When those eras were first
introduced is not at present with certainty known. If that of Vicrama'-
ditya, dating with a most memorable event of his reign, came into use
• Mun,oaBlds^,c, l.^iQ — 18. ^ Vdrt. &niiL Mun. ou Bhus. ^ Vrihat-sanliitd.
g2
xliv NOTES AND ILLUSTRATIONS.
during its continuance, still its introduction could not be from the first so
general as at once and universally to supersede the former era of Yudhish-
t'iiira. But the argument drawn from Arvabhatta's use of the ancient
epoch, and his silence respecting the modem, so far as it goes, favours the
presumption that he lived before the origin of the modern eras. Certainly
he is anterior to Brahmegupta, who cites him in more than a hundred
places by name; and to Vara'ha-mihira, whose compilation is founded,
among other authorities, on the Romaca of Sbi'shena, and Vdsisht'ha of
Vishnu-chandra, which Brahmegupta aflSrms to be partly taken from
Arvabhat'ta.' The priority of this author is explicitly asserted likewise
by the celebrated astronomer Gan'es'a, who, in explanation of his own un-
dertaking, says, " Rules framed by other holy sages were right in the Trctu
" and Dwdpara; but, in the present age, Pa'ra's'ara's. Arvabhatta,
" however, finding his imperfect, after great lapse of time, reformed the sys-
" tern. It grew inaccurate and was therefore amended by Durgasinha,
" MiHiKA, and others. This again became insufficient : and correct rules
/' were framed by the son of Jisiinu [Brahmegupta] founded upon
J* Brahma's revelation. His sytem also, after a long time, came to exhibit
■I*' diflferences. Ce's'ava rectified it. Now, finding this likewise, a little in-
" correct after sixty years, his son Gan'es'a has perfected it, and reconciled
" computation and experience.'"
ARyABHATTA then preceded Brahmegupta who lived towards the middle
of the sixth century of the Saca era; and Vara'iia-mihira placed by the
chronologers of Ujjayani at the beginning of the fifth or of the second; (for
they notice two astronomers of the name.) He is prior also to Vishnu
CHANDRA, Srishe'n'a, and Durgasinha; all of them anterior to the second
Vara'ha-mihira ; and an interval of two or of three centuries is not more
than adequate to a series of astronomers following each other in the task of
emendation, which process of time rendered successively requisite.
.f^ On these considerations it is presumed, that Arvabhatta is unquestion-
ably to be placed earlier than the fifth century of the Saca : and probably so,
by several (by more than two or three) centuries : and not unlikely before the
commencement of either Saca or Sambat eras. In other words, he flourished
some ages before the sixth century of the Christian era : and perhaps lived be-
fore, or, at latest, soon after its commencement. Between these limits, either
■ Brahm. Sidd'h. c. U. § 48—51. ' Citation by NRfsiNHA on Sir. Sidd'fi.
VARA'HA-MIHIRA, xlv
the third or the fourth century might be assumed as a middle term. We
shall, however, take the fifth of Christ as the latest period to which Abya-
bhat'ta can, on the most moderate assumption, be referred.
WRITINGS AND AGE OF VARAHA-MIHIRA.
This distinguished astrological writer, a native of Ujjayani, and son of
AniTrADASA,' was author of a copious work on astrology, compiled, and, as
he declares, abridged from earlier writers. It is comprised in three parts;
the first on astronomy ; the second and third, on divination : together con-
stituting a complete course. Such a course, he observes in his preface to
the third part, has been termed by ancient writers Sanhitd, and consists of
three Scand'has or parts : the first, which teaches to find a planet's place by
computation (ganita), is called tantra; the second, which ascertains lucky
and unlucky indications, is named hora; it relates chiefly to nativities,
journeys, and weddings ; the third, on prognostics relative to various mat-
ters, is denominated Sachd. The direct and retrograde motions of planets,
with their rising and setting, and other particulars, he goes on to say, had
beeii propounded by him in a treatise termed Carana, meaning, as the scho-
liast remarks, his compilation entitled Pancha-sidd'hd7iticd : Avhich consti-
tutes the first and astronomical portion of his entire work. What relates to
the first branch of astrology (hard), the author adds, had likewise been de-
livered by him, including nativities and prognostics concerning journeys and
weddings. These astrological treatises of his author, the scholiast observes,
are entitled Vrihat-jdtaca, Vrlhad-ydtrd, and Vrthad-vivdha-patala. The
author proceeds to deliver the third part of his course, or the second on
divination, omitting, as he says, superfluous and pithless matter, which
abounds in the writings of his predecessors : such as questions and replies in
dialogue, legendary tales, and the mythological origin of the planets.
' Vrihat-j&taca, c. 26 § 5; where the author so describes himself. His scholiast also calls him
Avantka from his native city Ujjayani, and terms him a Magadha Brahmen, and a compiler of
astronomical science. BnATToTPAf.A on Fr/.-^Vif. 1. The same scholiast similarly describes him
in the introduction of a commentary on a work of bis ton Prithuyas'as.
xlvi NOTES AND ILLUSTRATIONS.
The tliird part is extant, and entire ; and is generally known and cited by
• the title of Vrihat-sanhitd ; or great course of astrology : a denomination
well deserved ; for, notwithstanding the author's professions of conciseness,
it contains about four thousand couplets distributed in more than a hundred
chapters, or precisely (including the metrical table of contents) 106.
Of the second part, the first section, on casting of nativities, called Vrihat-
jdtaca, is also extant, and comprises twenty-five chapters ; or, with the me-
trical table of contents and peroration which concludes it, twenty-six. The
other two sections of this part of the course have not been recovered, though
probably extant in the hands of Hindu astrologers.
The scholia of the celebrated commentator of this author's works, who is
usually called Bkatt^tpala, and who in several places of his commentary
names himself Utpala, (quibbling with simulated modesty on his appella-
tion ; for the word signifies stone •}) are preserved ; and are complete tor the
third part of the author's course ; and for the first section of the second :
and the remainder of it likewise is probably extant ; as the copy of the first
section, in the possession of the author of this dissertation, terminates abrupt-
ly after the commencement of the second.
This commentator is noticed in the list of authorities furnished by the
astronomers of Ujjayan'i ; and is there stated as of the year 890 of the ^aca
era (A. D. 1068). Sir JVillia7n Jo sis supposed him to be the son of the
author, whose work is expounded by him. The grounds of this notion,
which is not, however, very positively advanced by that learned orientalist,*
are not set forth. No intimation of such relation of the scholiast to his
author, appears in the preface or the conclusion, nor in the colophon, of the
commentary which has been inspected: nor in the body of the work ; where
the author is of course repeatedly named or referred to, without however
any addition indicative of filial respect, as Hindu writers usually do employ
when speaking of a parent or ancestor. Neither is there any hint of rela-
tionship in the commentary of the same scholiast Bhatt6tpala on a brief
treatise of divination, entitled Prasna-cdshti, comprizing fifty-six stanzas, by
' Preface to the Commentary on the Vrihat-j&lara. Conclusion of the gloss on ch. 18 of VrVtat-
sanhitA, &c. ' Stone (utpalaj frames the raft of interpretation to cross the ocean composed by
Vardhamiliira.'
* The words are ' the comment written by Bhattotpala, who, it seems, was a son of the au-
thor.' As. Res. 2. 390.
VARA'HA-MIHIRA. ,i^^ xlvii
PriVhuyas'as son of Varaha-mihira. The suggestion of the filial rela-
tion of the scholiast is probably therefore a mere error.
The Pancha-sidcT hanticd of Vara'ha-mihira has not yet been recovered;
and is only at present known from quotations of authors ; and particularly a
number of passages cited from it by his scholiast in couise of interpreting
his astrological writings. An important passage of it so quoted will be
noticed forthwith.
It is a compilation, as its name implies, from five sidd'hdntas ; and they
are specified in the second chapter of the Vrthat-sanhitd, where the author
is enumerating the requisite qualifications of an astronomer competent to
calculate a calendar : among other attainments he requires him to be con-
versant with time measured by yugas, &c. as taught in the five sidd'hdntas
upon astronomy named Paulisa, Romaca, Vdsisht'ha, Saura, and Paitdmaha^
The title of Vara'ha-mihira's compilation misled a writer on Hindu
astronomy* into an unfounded supposition, that he was the acknowledged
author of the five sidd'hdntas ; the names of two of which moreover are
mistaken, Soma and Paulastya being erroneously substituted for Romaca and
Paulisa. These two, as well as the Vdsisht'ha, are the works of known
authors, namely, Pulis'a, Srishena, and Visiinu-chandra; all three men-
tioned by Brahmegupta: by whom also the whole five sidd'hdntas are
noticed under the very same names and in the same order f and who has
specified the authors of the first three.* The Vdsisht'ha of Vishnu-chandra
was indeed preceded by an earlier work (so entitled) of an unknown author,
from which that, as well as the Romaca, is in part taken;' and it may be
deemed an amended edition : but the Romaca and Paulisa are single of the
names ; and no Hindu astronomer, possessing any knowledge of the history
of the science cultivated by him, ever could imagine, that Vara'ha-mihira
composed the work which takes its name from Pulis'a, the distinguished
founder of a sect or school in astronomy opposed to that of Arya-bhat'ta.
The passage of the Pancha-sidd'hdnticd cited by the scholiast,* and
^ promised to be here noticed, has been quoted in an essay inserted in the
researches of the Asiatic Society,' as well as a parallel passage of the Vuhat-
' Vrihat-tanhiti, c. 2. § 7. * As. Res. 8. 196.
» Brahm. SidiTh. c. 14. ♦ Ibid. c. 11. ' Ibid,
• On Vrlhat-sanhiti, c. 2. ' As. Res. 12.
xlviii NOTES AND ILLUSTRATIONS.
satihitA,^ both relative to the ancient and actual position of the colurcs ; anct
deemed parallel (though one be less precise than the other); since they are
cited together as of the same author, and consequently as of like import,
by the scholiast.' The text of the Vrihat-sanhitd is further authenticated by
a quotation of it in the commentary of PriVhu'daca on Brahmegupta;'
and the former position of the colures is precisely that which is described in
the calendar appendant on the Vedas* and which is implied in a passage of
Pa'ra's'ara, concerning the seasons, which is quoted by Bhatt6tpala.
The position of the colures, affirmed as actual in his time by Vara'ha-
MiHiRA, in the Vrthat-sanhitd, implies an antiquity of either 1216 or 1440
years before A. D. 1800, according to the origin of the ecliptic determined
from the star Chitrd (Spica virginis) distant either 180° or 183° from it; or
a still greater antiquity, if it be taken to have corresponded more nearly
with the Grecian celestial sphere. The mean of the two numbers (disre-
garding the surmise of greater antiquity,) carries him to A. D. 472. If
Vara'ha-mihira concurred with those Indian astronomers, who allow an
oscillation of the equinox to 27' in 1800 years, or a complete oscillation of
that extent both E. and W. in 7200 years, he must have lived soon after the
year 3600 of the Call yuga, or 421 Saca, answering to A. D. 499; which is
but six years from the date assigned to him by the astronomers of Ujjayani:
and twenty-seven from the mean before inferred.
It is probable, therefore, that he flourished about the close of the fifth
century of the Christian era; and this inference is corroborated by the
mention of an astrologer of this name in the Panchat antra, the Sanscrit ori-
ginal of the fables of Pilpay translated in the reign of Nusuirvan, King of
Persia, in the latter part of the sixth century and beginning of the seventh.'
To that conclusion there is opposed an argument drawn from a passage of
the Bhdsvati-carana ; in which the author of that treatise dated 1021 Saca
(A. D. 1098) professes to have derived instruction from Mihira, meaning,
•as is supposed, oral instruction from Vara'ha-mihira ; and the argument
has been supported by computations which make the Surya-siddlidnta and
Jdtacdniava, the latter ascribed to Vara'ha-mihira, to be both worlis of the
same period, and as modern as the eleventh century.'
■ C. 3. § 1 and 2. » On Vrt. Sanh. c. 2.
' Brahm. Sidd'A. c. 11, § 54. * As. Res. 8. 469.
' Prel'. to the Sansc. Hitopadcsa. Edit. Serampur. * As. Res. 6. 572.
VARA'HA-MIHIRA. xlix
To this it has been replied, that the Mihira, from whom Sata'nanda,
author of the Bh/isicati, derived instruction, is not the same person or per-
sonage with die author of tiic I'rl/iaf sanhitd; if indeed Sata'nanda's ex-
pression do intend the same name, Vara ha.' That expression must he
allowed to be a very imperfect designation, which omits half, and that the
most distinctive half, of an apj^ellation : and it is not such, as would be
applied by a contemporary and auditor to an author and lecturer, whose
celebrity could not yet be so generally diffused, as to render a part of his
name a sufficient intimation of the remainder : without previous and well
established association of the terms. But even conceding the interpretation,
it would then be right to admit a third Vara'ha-mihira, besides the two
noticed by the chronologists of Ujjayani; and the third will be an astrono-
mer, contemporary with Raja Bh6ja-deva ; and the preceptor of Sata'-
nanda; and author of the Jatacarriara, supposing this treatise on nativities
to be properly ascribed to an author bearing that name, and to be on suffi-
cient grounds referred to the eleventh century.
There remains to be here noticed another treatise on casting of nativities,
to which the same favourite name of a celebrated astrologer is affixed. It
is a concise tract entitled Laghu-jataca: and its authenticity as a work of
the astrologer of Ujjayani is established by the verifying of a quotation of
the scholiast Bhatt6tpala; who cites a passage of his author's compen-
dious treatise on the same subject (swalpa jdtaca) in course of expounding
a rule of prognostication concerning the destination of a prince to the throne
and his future character as a monarch (Vr^ihatjataca, 11. 1.). That passage
occurs in the Laghujdtaca (Misc. Chap.). It is hardly to be supposed, that
the same writer can have given a third treatise on the same subject of
nativities, entitled Jdtacdrriava.
The question concerning the age of the Surya-siddhdnta remains for con-
sideration. It is a very material one; as both Vara'ha-mihira and Brah-
jiEGUPTA speak of a Saura (or Solar) siddhdnia, which is a title of the same
import: and, unless a work bearing this title may have existed earlier than
the age, which is assigned, for reasons to be at a future time examined, to
the Surya-sidd' hdnta, the conclusions respecting the periods when they re-
spectively wrote, are impeached in the degree in which those grounds of
calculation may deserve confidence. Those grounds in detail will be dis-
cussed at a separate opportunity. But independently of this discussion of
' As. Res. 12. p. 224.
h
1 NOTES AND ILLUSTRATIONS.
their merits, sufficient evidence does exist to establish, that more than one
edition of a treatise of astronomy has borne the name of Surya (with its
synonyma) the sun. For Lacshmidasa cites one under the title of Vrihat
surya-sidd'hAnta} (for a passage which the current solar Sidd'hdnta does not
exhibit;) in contradistinction to another more frequently cited by him with-
out the distinctive epithet of Vrihat : and in these latter instances his cjuota-
tions admit of verification. A reference of Bha'scara to a passage of the
Saura, or, as explained by Iris own annotation, t\\QSurya-sidd'h(inta,i\ots not
agree with the text of the received Siirya-sidd' hatiia.^ His commentators
indeed do not unreservedly conclude from the discrepancy a difterence of
the work quoted, and that usually received under the same title. Yet the
inference seems legitimate. At all events the quotation from the Vrilutt-
surya-sidd'hdnta, in the Ganita-tatwa-chintdmani of Lacshmida'sa, proves
beyond question, that in that commentator's o])inion, and consistently with
his knowledge, more than one treatise bearing the same name existed.
There is evidence besides of Arabian writers, that a system of astronomy
bearing the equivalent title of Area (Solar) was one of three, which were
found by them current among the Hindus, when the Arabs obtained a
knowledge of the Indian astronomy in the time of the Abbasside Khalifs,
about the close of the eighth century or commencement of the ninth of the
Christian era.' Arcand, the name by which the Arabs designate one of those
three astronomical systems, assigning it as an Indian term, is the well known
corruption of Area in the common dialects, and is familiar in the application
of the same word as a name of a plant (Asclepias Gigantea) which, bearing
all the synonyma of the sun, is called vulgarly Acand, or Arcand.
The solar doctrine of astronomy appears then to have been known bv this
name to the Arabians as one of three Indian astronomical systems a thousand
years ago. The fact is that both the title and the system are considerably more
ancient. Revisions of systems occasionally take place; like Brahmegupta's
levisal of the Brahma-sidd'hdnta, to adapt and modernise them ; or, in other
words, for the purpose, as Brahmegupta intimates, of reconciling compu-
tation and observation. 'i\\c Surya ox Arca-sidd'hdnta, no doubt, has under-
gone this process ; and actually exhibits manifest indicatioiis of it.*
In every view, it is presumed, that any question concerning the age of
the present text of the Surya-siddhdnta, or determination of that question,
• Ght. tawat chiiit. on Spherics of Siromarii, ch. 4. Cons, of Sines. ' As. Res. 12.
' See Note N. * As. lies, 2. 235.
1
J
VARAHA-MIIIIRA. U
will leave mitouchefl the evidence for the age of the author of the Vrihat-
sanhita, Vara'ha-mihira, son of Adityada'sa, an astrologer of Ujjayani,
who appears to have flourished at the close of the fifth, or beginning of the
sixth century of the Christian era. He was preceded, as it seems, by another
of the same name, who lived, according to the chronologists of Ujjayani, at
the close of the second century. He may have been followed by a third,
who is said to have flourished at the Court of Raja' Bhoja-de'va of Dhara,
and to have had SataVanda, the author of the Bhdsvati, for his scholar.
L.
INTRODUCTION AND PROGRESS OF ALGEBRA AMONG
THE ITALIANS.
Leonardo of Pisa was unquestionably the first who made known the
Arabian Algebra to Christian Europe. This fact was, indeed, for a time
disputed, and the pretensions of the Italians to the credit of being the first
European nation, which cultivated Algebra, were contested, upon vague
surmises of a possible, and therefore presumed probable, communication of
the science of Algebra, together with that of Arithmetic, by the Saracens of
Spain to their Christian neighbours in the Peninsula, and to others alleged
to have resorted thither for instruction. The conjecture, hazarded by Wallis
(Algebra historical and practical) on this point, was assisted by a strange
blunder, in which Blancanus was followed by Vossius and a herd of sub-
sequent writers, concerning the age of Leonardo, placed by them precisely
two centuries too low. The claims of the Italians in his favour, and for
themselves as his early disciples, were accordingly resisted with a degree of
acrimony (Gua. Mem. de I'Acad. des Sc. 1741. p. 436.) which can only be
accounted for by that disposition to detraction, which occasionally manifests
itself in the literary, as in the idler, walks of society. The evidence of his
right to acknowledgments for transplanting Arabian Algebra into Europe,
was for a long period ill set forth: but, when diligently sought, and care-
fully adduced, doubt was removed and opposition silenced.'
• Montucla, 2d Ed. Addns.
h2
lii NOTES AND ILLUSTRATIONS.
The merit of vindicating his claim belongs chiefly to Cossali.* A manu-
script of Leoxardo's treatise on Arithmetic and Algebra, bearing the title
oi Liber Abbaci compositus a Leonardo Jilio Bonacci Pisatio in anno 1202,
was found towards the middle of the last century by Targioni Tozzetti* in
the Magliabecchiau library at Florence, of which he had the care ; and
another work of that author, on scjuare numbers, was afterwards found by
the same person inserted in an anonymous compilation, treating of compu-
tation, (un trattato d'Abbaco), in the library of a royal hospital at the same
place. A transcript of one more treatise of the same writer was noticed by
Tozzetti in the Magliabecchiau collection, entitletl Leotia?-di Pisani dejiliis
Bonacci Practica Geomctrice composita anno 1220. The subject of it is
confined to mensuration of land; and, being mentioned by the author in his
ej)istle prefixed to the revised Liber Abbaci, shows the revision to be of later
date. It appears to be of 1228.^ Tozzetti subsequently met with a second
copy of the Liber Abbaci iu INlagliabecchi's collection: but it is described by
him as inaccurate and incomplete.* A third has been since discovered in the
lliccardian collection, also at Florence: and a fourth, but imperfect one, was
communicated by Nelli to Cossali.* No diligence of research has, how-
ever, regained any trace of the volume which contained Leonardo's treatise
on square numbers: the library, in which it was seen, having been dispersed
previously to Cossali's inquiries.
It appears from a brief account of himself and his travels, and the motives
of his undertaking, which Leonardo has introduced into his preface to the
Liber Abbaci, that he travelled into Egypt, Barbary, Syria, Greece, and
Sicily ; that being in his youth at Bugia in Barbary, where his father
Bonacci held an employment of scribe at the Custom House by appointment
from Pisa, for Pisan merchants resorting thither, he was there grounded in
the Indian method of accounting by nine numerals; and that finding it more
commodious, and far preferable to that which was used in other countries
visited by him, he prosecuted the study,* and with sonie additions of his own,
and taking some things from Euclid's geometry, he undertook the com-
■ Origine, &c. dell'Algelira. Parma 1797. ^ Fiaggi, land \\. Edit. 1751 — 1754.
' Cossali, Origine, &c. c. 1. § 5. ♦ Viaggi, ii. Edit. 1768.
' Origine, &c. deli' Algebra, c. 2. § 1.
* Quare amplectens strictius ipsum inodum Yndbrum, et actentiiis studens in eo, ex proprio
sensu quxdara addens, et quxdam e.\ subtilitatibus Eiiclidis geometria; artis apponens, &c.
ALGEBRA AMONG THE ITALIANS. liii
position of the treatise in question, that " the Latin race might no longer be
found deficient in the complete knowledge of that method of computation."
In the epistle prefixed to the revision of his work he professes to have taught
the complete doctrine of numbers according to the Indian method.^
His peregrinations then, and his study of the Indian computation through
tlie medium of Arabic, in an African city, took place towards the close of
the twelfth century; the earliest date of his work being A. C. 1202.
He had been preceeded by more than two centuries, in the study of arith-
metic under Muhannnedan instructors, by Gerbert (the Pope SilvesterII.^),
whose ardour for the acquisition of knowledge led him at the termination of
a two years noviciate, as a Benedictine, to proceed by stealth into Spain,
where he learnt astrology from the Saracens, and with it more valuable
science, especially arithmetic. This, upon his return, he comnmnicated to
Christian Europe, teaching the method of numbers under the designation of
Abacus, a name apparently first introduced by him, (rationes luimerorum
Abaci,') by rules abstruse and difficult to be understood, as William of
Malmesbury affirms: Abacum certeprijnus a Saracenis rapiens, regulas dedit,
yuceasitdantibus Abacistis vix intelliguntur.* It was probably owing to this
obscurity of his rules and manner of treating the Arabian, or rather Indian
arithmetic, that it made so little progress between his time and that of the
Pisan.
Leo.vahdo's work is a treatise of Arithmetic, terminated, as Arabic treatises
of computation are similarly,' by the solution of equations of the two first
degrees. In the enumeration and exposition of the parts comprised in his
fifteenth chapter, which is his last, he says, Tertia erit super modumAlgebrce et
Almucabalce ; and, beginning to treat of it, lucipit pars tertia de solutione
quarundam qucestionum secundum modujn Algebra et Ahnucabalce, scilicet op-
pnsitionis et restaurationis. The sense of the Arabic terms are here given in
the inverse order, as has been remarked by Cossali, and as clearly appears
from Leonardo's process of resolving an equation, which will be hereafter
shown.
Plenam iiumeroruni doctrinam edidi Yndoruni, fjiietn modum in ipsa scienlia piaestaiitiorem
elegi.
* Arch bishop in 992; Pope in r)C)g-^ died in 1003.
' Ep. prefixed to his Treatise De Nuraerorum Divisione. Cerb. Ep. JfiO. (Ed. ifill.)
* Ue Gestis Anglorum, c. 2.
» See Mr. Strachey's examination of the Khuldsatu'lhia&b, As. Res. J 2. Early History of Alg.
liv NOTES AND ILLUSTRATIONS.
He premises the observation, tliat in nunil«;r three considerations are dis-
tinguished: one simple and absohjte, which is that of number in itself: the
other two, relative; being those of root and of square. The latter, as he
adds, is called census, which is the term he afterwards employs throughout.
It is the equivalent of the Arabic M//1, which properly signifies wealth,
estate; and census seems therefore to be here employed by Leonardo, on
account of its correspondent acceptation; (quicquidfortunarum quis habet.
Steph.) in like manner as he translates the Arabic shai by res, thing, as a
designation of the root unknown.
He accoi-dingly proceeds to observe, that the simple numl)er, the root, and
the square (census), are equalled together in six M'^ays: so that six forms of
equality are distinguished: the three first of which are called simple; and
the three others compound. The order, in which he arranges them, is pre-
cisely that which is copied by Paciolo.* It differs by a slight transposition
from the order in which they occur in the earliest Arabic treatises of Alge-
bra;* and which, no doubt, was retained in the Italian vei-sion from the
Arabic executed by Guglielmo Di Lunis, and others who are noticed by
CossALi upon indications which are pointed out by him.' For Paciolo
cautions the reader not to regard the difference of arrangement, as this is a
matter of arbitrary choice.* Leonahdo's six-fold distinction, reduced to the
modem algebraic notation, is 1st, x^=p x. 2d, a:*=n. 3d, /> .r=?z. 4tli,
x^+p x—n. 5th, p x + n=x^. 6th, x'' + n=p x. In Paciolo's abridged no-
tation it is 1st, c° e c*. 2d, c° e n". 3d, c* e n°, S^x.' The Arabic arrange-
ment, in the treatise of the Khuwarezmite, is, 1st, x''=p x. 2d, x"=n. '3(\,
p x=n. 4th, a^+p x=n. 2d, x" + n=p x. 3d, /> a' + «=.r'. Later compi-
lations transfer the third of these to the first place."
Like the Arabs, Leonardo omits and passes unnoticed the fourth form of
quadratic equations, .r*+// .r + M=o. It could not, indeed, come within the
Arabian division of equations into simple, between species and species, and
compound, between one species and two:' quantity being either stated
affnmatively, or restored in this Algebra to the positive form. Paciolo
expressly observes, that in no other but these six ways, is any equation be-
• Summa de Arithinetica, &c. » See Note N. ' Originc, &c. deU'Alg.
♦ Summa, 8. 5. 5. ' Summa, 8. 5. 5. ' Khulasatu'l hisdb.
' Khuldsatu'l his/lb.
ALGEBRA AMONG THE ITALIANS. Iv
tween those quantities possible: Altramente che i quest i 6 discorsi modi non e
possible alciina loro equatione.
Leoxardo's resolution of the three simple cases of equation is not ex-
hibited by CossALi. It is, however, the same, no doubt, with that which is
taught by Paciolo ; and which precisely agrees with the rules contained in
the Arabic books.' To facilitate comparison, and obviate distant reference,
Paciolo's rules are here subjoined in fewer words than he employs.
J St, Divide the things by the squares [coefficient by coefficient], the
quotient is the value of thing.
2d, Divide the number by the squares [by the coefficient of the square],
the root of the quotient is the value of thing.
3d, Divide the number by the things [that is, by the coefficient], the
quotient is the value of thing.^
The resolution of the three cases of compound equations is delivered by
CossALi from Leonaudo, contracting his rugged Latin into modern Alge-
braic form.
1st, Bej^+/>x=n. Then .r=— i/> + v/ (i/>' + 7j).
2d, Be J- =p x + n. Then a- =-i /> + v^ (i />' + «)•
3d, Be x- + n=p x. Then, if ^ p''^n, the equation is impossible. If
ip^ = n, then x=^ p. If i p'7«, then x=i p-/ (i p^-n), or =-Lp+ ^
Up'-")-
He adds the remark: Ei sic, si non solvetur quastio cum diminutione, solve-
tur cum additione.
The rules are the same which are found in the Arabic treatises of algebra.'
The same rules will be likewise found in the work of Paciolo, expressed
with his usual verboseness in his Italian text: to which, in this instance, he
has added in the margin the same instructions delivered in a conciser form in
Latin memorial verses. As they are given at length by Montucla, it is un-
necessary to cite them in this place. On the subject of the impossible case
Paciolo adds, as a Notandum utilissimuni, ' Sel numero qual si trova in la
detta equatione accotnpagnato con lo censo, sel non eminore o veramente equale
al quadrato de la mita de le cose, el caso essere insolubik : e pur consequente
detto agguagUamenlo non potere avvenire per alcun modo.' Summa, 8. 4. 12.
Concerning the two roots of the (juadratic equation in the other case,
' See Note N ; and As. Res. 12. * Summa, 8. 5. 6. ' See Note N.
IH NOTES AND ILLUSTRATIONS.
under the same head, he thus expands the short concluding remark of Lko-
NARDO: Sia che I'uno e I'aliro modo satisja al tema: ma a Ic volte se havi la
veriia a Vuno modo, a le volte a raltro;^ el perche, se cavanda la radice del
delta remanente de la mita de le cose non satisfacesse al tana, la detta radice
aggiugni a la mita de le cose e averai el quesito : e mat Ja Hera che a Viino di lai
modi non sia satisfatta al quesito, cioe giognendo le, ovvero cavando la del
dimeciamento de le cose. Summa, 8. 4. 12.
BoMBELLi remarks somewhat differently on the same point. Nei quesiti
alcana volta, ben che di rado, il restante 7ion serci, ma ben si la sovima setnpre.
Alg. 2. 262.
The rules for the resolution of compound equations are demonstrated hy
Leonardo upon rectihnear figures ; and in the last instance he has reference
to Euclid. — Lib. 2. Th. 5. There is room then to surmise, that some of the
demonstrations are among the additions which he professes to have made.
Among the many problems which he proceeds to resolve, two of which arc
selected by Cossali for instances of his manner, it will be sufficient to cite
one, in the resolution of which the whole thread of his operations is ex-
hibited ; substituting, however, the more compendious modern signs. His
manner of conducting the algebraic process may be fully understood from
this single instance.
Problem: To divide the number 10 into two parts, such that dividing one
by the other, and adding 10 to the sum of the quotient, and multiplying the
aggregate by the greater, the amount is finally 1 14.
Let the right line a be the greater of the parts sought; which I call thing
(quarii pono rem): and the right line A ^ equal to 10: to which are joined in
the same direction ^</, de, representing the quotients of division of the parts,
one by the other. Since a multiplied by A e is equal to 114, therefore
aXb g + aXg d+a + d e= 1 14; and taking from each side aXb g, there will be
aXg d+aXd e=\\^—aXb g. lie g d the quotient 10— a, there will arise
a
]0^a + aXd e=\l^—aXb g=]\4!—\0 a; since i^g" is equal to 10. Whence
aXc? e=104— 9«- But fi?e is the quotient a : wherefore «* =104>— 9 a.
lO-a lO-a
So that fl*= 1040— 194 o + 9 a*. Restore diminished things (restaura res di-
' Compare with Hindu Algebra. Vij.-gan. § 130 and 142.
ALGEBRA AMOXG THE ITALIANS. Irn
mmutas), and take one square from each side (et extrahe unum censum
ab utraque parte), the remainder is 8 a^+ 1040=191 a; and, dividing by
eight, «*+130=«+i«; and resolving this according to rule, a=y7—
F
•(97)^-1 30=97-33=8: consequently lO-a=2.
Besides his great work on arithmetic and algebra, Leos^akdo was author
of a separate treatise, as already intimated, on square numbers. Reference
b formally made to it by Paciolo, who drew largely from this source, and
who mentions Le quali domande (Questions concerning square numbers)
tono difficiUisstMe <juanto ala daiunutTatione iela practica: comme sm chi he»
la scrtitinato. Maxime Leonardo Pisano in un particulare tractato eke fa
de quadratis numeris intitulato. Dact con grande sforzo se ingegna dare
norma e regola a timili tolutum. Summa 1. 4. 6.
The directions for the solntion of sacfa problems being p ro f es sedly taken
by Paciolo chiefly from Lkovabdo, and the problems themselves which
are "f*?*^'*** by him being probably so, it can be no difficult task to restore
tiie lost work of Leovabdo on this sttbject. The divination has accordii^ly
been attempted by Cossali, and with a coosderable degree of success.
(Origine, &c. dell' Algebra, c. 5.)
Among problems of diis sort which are treated by Paciolo after Leo-
nardo, several are found in the canent Arabic treatises; otfaers, which
belong to the indeterminate analysis, occur in the algebraic treatises of the
Hindus : some, which are more properly EHophantiDe^ may have been taken
from the Aralnc tiansiation, or commentary, of die work of Diophantns.
Leovabdo's endeavour to reduce the solution of such problems to general
rule and system, according to Paciolo's intimation of his eflorts towards
that end, must have been purely his own : as nothing sy stem at ic to this effect
is to be found in the Arainc treatises of Algebra; and as he clearly had no
oommoBicatioB thtoogh his Arab mstrnctors, nor any knowledge of the
ttadv i n ertio d fc fiir the genefal i c wi l ii tio n of indeterminate proUens simple
or qnadiatie.
MoxTccLA, who had originally underrated the perAmnance of Leo-
SABDO, seems to have finally conceded to it a merit rather beyond its desert,
when he ascribes to that author the resohition of certain biquadratics as
derivatiTe eqnatioiis of die second degree. The doivathre rules were.
Iviii NOTES AND ILLUSTRATIONS.
according to Cardan's aflTinnation, added to the original ones of Leonakdo
by an uncertain author; ami placed with the principal by Paciolo. Car-
dan's testimony in this respect is indeed not conclusive, as the passage, in
which the subject is mentioned, is in other points replete with errors : attri-
buting the invention of Algebra to Muhammed son of Musa, and alleging
the testimony of Leonardo to that point; limiting Leonardo's rules to
four, and intimating that Paciolo introduced the derivative rules in the
same place with the principal: all which is unfounded and contrary to the
fact. Cossali, however, who seeftis to have diligently examined Leonardo's
remains, does not claim this honour for bis author: but appears to admit
Cardan's position, that the derivative, or, as they are termed by Paciolo,
the proportional equations, and rules for the solution of them, were devised
by an uncertain author; and introduced by Paciolo into his compilation
under a separate head: which actually is the case. (Summa 8, 6, 2, &c.)
In regard to the blunder, in which Montucla copied earlier writers,
respecting the time when Leonardo of Pisa flourished, he has defended
himself (i2d edit. Additions) against the reprehension of Cossali, upon the
plea, that he was not bound to know of manuscripts existing in certain
libraries of Italy, which served to show the age in which that autlior lived.
The excuse is not altogether valid: for Targioni Tozzetti had announced
to the public the discovery of the manuscripts in question, with the date,
and a sufficient intimation of the contents ; several years before the first
volumes of Montucla's History of Mathematics appeared.'
I am withheld from further animadversion on the negligence of an author,
who has in other respects deserved well of science, by the consideration,
that equal want of research, and in the very same instance, has been mani-
fested by more recent writers, and among our own countrymen. Even so
lately as in the past year (1816) a distinguished mathematician, writing in
the Encyclopaedia which bears the national appellation," has relied on obso-
lete authorities and antiquated disquisitions concerning the introduction of
the denary numerals into Europe; and shown total unacquaintance with
what was made public sixty years ago by Targioni Tozzetti and amply
discussed by Cossali in a copious work on the progress of Algebra in Italy,
■TAaGioNi TozzETTi's first volume bears date 1751. His sixth, (the last of his first edition)
1754. Montucla's first two volumes were published in 1758.
* Encycl. Brit. Supp. art. Arithmetic.
ALGEBRA AMONG THE ITALIANS. lix
and in an earlier one on the origin of Arithmetic, published more than
twenty years since: matter fuih^ recognised by Montucla in his second
edition, and briefly noticed in common biographical dictionaries.'
In the article of the Encyclopiedia, to which reference has been just made,
the author is not less unfortunate in all that he says concerning the Hindus
and their arithmetical knowledge. He describes the Lilanat'i as " a short
and meagre performance headed with a silly preamble and colloquy of the
gods." (Where he got this colloquy is difficult to divine; the Lildvati
contains none). " The examples," he says, " are generally very easy, and
only written on the margin with red ink." (Not so written in any one
among the many copies collated or inspected.) " Of fractions," he adds,
" whether decimal or vulgar, it treats not at all." (See Ch. 2. Sect. 3. and
Ch. 4. Sect. 2. also § 138.)
He goes on to say, " the Hindus pretend, that this arithmetical treatise
was composed about the year 1 185 of the Christian era, &c." Every thing
in that passage is erroneous. The date of the Lildvati is 1 150, at the latest.
The uncertainty of the age of a manuscript does not, as suggested^ affect
the certainty of the date of the original composition. It is not true, as
alleged, that the oriental transcriber is accustomed to incorporate without
scruple such atlditions in the text as he thinks fit. Nor is it practicable for
him to do so with a text arranged in metre, of which the lines are numbered :
as is the case with Sanscrit text books in general. Collation demonstrates
that no such liberty has been taken with the particular book in question.
The same writer affirms, that " the Persians, though no longer sovereigns
of Hindustan, yet display their superiority over the feeble Gentoos, since
they generally fill the offices of the revenue, and have the reputation of
being the most expert calculators in the east." This is literally and precisely
the reverse of the truth ; a.s every one knows, who has read or heard any
thing concerning India.
The author is not more correct when he asserts, that " it appears from a
careful inspection of the manuscripts preserved in the different public libra-
ries in Europe, that the Arabians were not acquainted with the denary
numerals before the middle of the thirteenth century of the Christian era."
Leoxardo of Pisa had learned the Indian numerals from Arabian instruc-
» Diet, Hist, par Chaudon and Delandine : art. Leonard de Pise. 7 Edit. (1789). Probably in
earlier editions liicewise.
is
Jx NOTES AND ILLUSTRATIONS.
tion in the twelfth century and taught the use of them in the second year
of tlie thirteenth: and the Arabs were in possession of the Indian mode of
computation by these numerals so far back as the eighth centuiy of the
Christian era.*
To return to the subject.
After Leonardo of Pisa, and before the invention of the art of printing
and publication of the first printed treatise on the science, by Paciolo,
Algebra was diligently cultivated by the Italian mathematicians; it was pub-
licly taught by professors; treatises were written on it; and recurrence was.
again had to the Arabian source. A translation of " the Rule of Algebra"
(La Regola dell' Argebraj from the Arabic into the language of Italy by
GuGLiELMO Di LuNis, is noticcd at the beginning of the Ragionamento di
Algebra by Raffaelo Caracci, the extant manuscript of which is consi-
dered by antiquarians to be of the fourteenth century.* A translation of the
original treatise of Muhammed ben Musa the Khuwarezmite appears to
have been current in Italy; and was seen at a later period by both Cardan
and BoMBELLi.^ Paolo della Pergola, Demetrio Bragadini, and
Antonio Cornaro, are named by Paciolo as successively filling the pro-
fessor's chair at Venice; the latter his own fellow-disciple. He himself
taught Algebra publicly at Peroscia at two different periods. In the pre-
ceding age a number of treatises on Algorithm, some of them with that title;,
others like Leonardo's, entitled De Abaco, and probably like his touching
on Algebra as well as Arithmetic, were circulated. Paolo di Dagomari,
in particular, a mathematician living in the middle of the fourteenth century,
obtained the surname of Deir Abaco for his skill in the science of numbers,
and is besides said to have been conversant with equations (whether algebraic
or astronomical may indeed be questioned ;) as well as geometry.*
With the art of printing came the publication of Paciolo; and the subse-
quent history of the inventions in Algebra by Italian masters is too well
known to need to be repeated in this place.
• See Note N.
» CossAH, Orig. &c. dell' Algebra, i. 7,
^ Ibid. 1.9. Cardan Ars Magn, 5.
♦ Ibid. i. 9. •-.
i
NOTES AND ILLUSTRATIONS. Ixi
^:L:-' M.
ARITHMETICS OF DIOPHANTUS.
. Five copies of Diophantus, vizt. three in the Vatican (Cossali, Orig. dell'
Alg. i. 4. § 2.))' Xilander's, supposed (Coss. ib. § 5) to be the same with
the Palatine inspected by Saumaise, though spoken of as distinct by Bachet,
(Epiit. ad. led.); and the Parisian used by Bachet himself (ib.); all
contain the same text. But one of the Vatican copies, believed to be that
which BoMBELLi consulted, distributes a like portion of text into seven in-
stead of six books. (^Coss. ib. § 5.) In truth the division of manuscript
books is very uncertain : and it is by no means improbable, that the remains
of Diophantus, as we possess them, may be less incomplete and constitute
a larger portion of the thirteen books announced by him {Def. 1 1.), than is
commonly reckoned. His treatise on polygon numbers, which is surmised
to be one, (and that the last of the thirteen,) follows, as it seems, the six
(or seven) books in the exemplars of the work, as if the preceding portion
were complete. It is itself imperfect : but the manner is essentially different
from that of the foregoing books: and the solution of problems by equations
is no longer the object, but rather the demonstration of propositions. There
appears no ground, beyond bare surmise, to presume, that the author, in the
rest of the tracts relative to numbers which fulfilled his promise of thirteen
books, resumed the Algebraic manner: or in short, that the Algebraic part
of his performance is at all mutilated in the copies extant, which are consi-
dered to be all transcripts of a single imperfect exemplar. (Bachet Ep.ad.
led.)
It is indeed alleged, that the resolution of compound equations (two
species left equal to one) which Diophantus promises {Def. 11.) to show
subsequently, bears reference to a lost part of his work. But the author,
after confining himself to cases of simple equations (one species equal to one
species) in the first three books, passes occasionally to compound equations
(two species equal to one; and even two equal to two species;) in the three
following books. Sec iv. Q. 33; vi. Q. 6 and 19; and Bachet on Def. 1 J,
and i. Q. 33. In various instances he pursues the solution of the problem,
until he arrives at a final quadratic equation ; and, as in the case of a simple
equation, he then merely states the value inferrible, without specifying the
Ixii NOTES AND ILLUSTRATIONS.
steps by which he arrives at the inference. See iv. Q. 23; vi. Q. 7, 9 and 1 1.
But, in other places, the steps are sufliciently indicated : particularly iv. Q.
33 and 45; v. Q. 13; vi. Q. 24: and his method of resolving the equation
is the same with the second of Brahmkgupta's rules for the resolution of
quadratics (Brahm. 18. § 34). The first of the Hindu author's rules, the
same with Srid'haua's quoted by Bha'scara (Vjj.-gan. § 131. Brahm. 18.
§ 32.), differs from that of Nugnez (Nonius) quoted by Bachet (on Dioph.
I. 33), in dispensing with the preliminary step of reducing the square term
to a single square: a preparation which the Arabs first introduced, as well
as the distinction of three cases of quadratics: for it was practised neither
by DioPHANTUS, nor by the Hindu Algebraists,
DiopiiANTUs has not been more explicit, nor methodical, on simple, than
on compound, equations. But there is no reason to conclude, that he re-
turned to either subject in a latter part of his work, for the purpose of com-
pleting the instruction, or better explaining the method of conducting the
resolution of those equations. Such does not seem to be the manner of his
arithmetics, in which general methods and comprehensive rules are wanting.
It is rather to be inferred, as Cossali does, from the compendious way
in which the principles of Algebra are delivered, or alluded to, by him,
that the determinate analysis was previously not unknown to the Greeks ;
wheresoever they got it: and that Diophantus, treating of it cursorily as a
matter already understood, gives all his attention to cases of indeterminate
analysis, in which perhaps he had no Greek precursor. (Coss. Orig. dell'
Alg. i. 4. § 10.) He certainly intimates, that some part of what he proposes
to teach is new : •crw? yXv au J'oxTi to z:^S,yy.x Siivyi^irt^ov £7r«iJ»i juiiVw y\»ui^ift.ov Iri.
While in other places (Z)e/! 10) he expects the student to be previousl}'^
exercised in the algorithm of Algebra. The seeming contradiction is recon-
ciled by conceiving the principles to have been known ; but the application
of them to a certain class of problems concerning numbers to have been
new.
Concerning the probable antiquity of the Diophantine Algebra ; all that
can be confidently affirmed is, that it is not of later date than the fourth
century of Christ. Among the works of Hvpatia, who was murdered
A. D. 41.5, as they are enumerated by Suidas, is a commentary on a work
of a Diophantus, most likely this author. An epigram in the Greek an-
thologia (lib. 2. c. 22) is considered with probability to relate to him : but
ARITHMETICS OF DIOPHANTUS. Ixiil
the age of its author Lucillius is uncertain. Bachet observes, that, so far
as can be conjectured, Lucillius lived about the time of Nero. This,
however, is mere conjecture.
DroPHANTUs is posterior to Hypsicles, whom he cites in the treatise on
polygon numbers. (Prop, 8.) This should furnish another fixt point. But
the date of Hypsicles is not well determined. He is reckoned the author,
or at least the reviser,* of two books subjoined to Euclid's elements, and
numbered 14th and loth. In the introduction, he makes mention of Apol-
LON'ius, one of whose writings, which touched on the ratio of the dode-
caedron and icosaedron inscribed in the same sphere, was considered by
Basilides of Tyre, and by the father of him (Hypsicles) as incorrect, and
Wjas amended by them accordingly : but subsequently he (Hypsicles) met
with another work of Apollonius, in which the investigation of the pro-
blem was satisfactory, and the demonstration of the proposition correct. Here
again Bachet observes, that, so far as can be conjectured, from the manner
in which he speaks of Apollonius, he must have lived not long after him.
CossALi goes a little further; and concludes on the same grounds, that they
were nearly contemporary. {Orig. delf Alg. i. 4. § 4.) The grounds seem
inadequate to support any such conclusion : and all that can be certainly
inferred is, that Hypsicles of Alexandria was posterior to Apollonius, who
flourished in the reign of Ptolomy Euergetis : two hundred years before
Christ.
Several persons of the name of Diophantus are noticed by Greek authors;
but none whose place of abode, profession, or avocations, seem to indicate
any correspondence with those of the mathematician and Algebraist: one a
prajtor of Athens mentioned by Diodokus Siculus, Zenobius, and Suidas;
another, secretary of king Herod, put to death for forgery, as noticed by
Tzetzes; and a third, the instructor of Libanius in eloquence, named by
Suidas in the article concerning that sophist and rhetorician.
The Armenian Abu'lfaraj places the Algebraist Diophantus under the
Emperor Julian. But it may be questioned, whether he has any authority
for that date, besides the mention by Greek authors of a learned person of
the name, the instructor of Libanius, who was contemporary with that
emperor.
' TMkhu'l hukmd cited by Casivli, Bibl. Arab. Hisp. i. 346. The Arabian author uses the
word Asleh amended.
Ixiv NOTES AND ILLUSTRATIONS.
LTpon the whole, however, it seems preferable to abide by the date fur-
nished in a professed history, even an Arabic one, on a Grecian matter : and
consider Diophantus as contemporary with the Emperor Julian, about
A. D. 365. That date is consistent with the circumstance of Hypatia
writing a commentarj'^ on his works ; and is not contradicted by any other
fact; nor by the aftirmation of any other writer besides Bombelli : on whose
authority Cossali nevertheless relies.
Bombelli, when he announced to the public the existence of a manu-
script of Diophantus in the Vatican, placed the author under the Emperor
Antoninus Pius without citing any grounds. His general accuracy is,
however, impeached by his assertion, that the Indian authors are frequently
cited by Diophantus. No such quotations are found in the very manu-
script of that author's work, which he is known to have consulted : and
which has been purposely reexamined. (Coss. i. 4. § 4.) Bombelli's
authority was, therefore, very properly rejected by Bachet ; and should
have been so by Cossali.
N.
FROGRESS AND PROFICIENCY OF THE ARABIANS IN
ALGEBRA.
In the reign of the second Abbasside Khalif Almansu'r, and in the 156th
year of the Hejira (_A. D. 773), as is related in the preface to the Astrono-
mical tables of Ben-Al-Adami published by his continuator Alca'sem in
SOS H. (A.D. 920), an Indian astronomer, well versed in the science which he
professed, visited the court of the Khalif, bringing with him tables of the
equations of planets according to the mean motions, with observations rela-
tive to both solar and lunar eclipses and the ascension of the signs ; taken,
as he affirmed, from tables computed by an Indian prince, M'hose name, as
the Arabian author writes it, was Phi'ghak. The Khalif, embracing the
opportunity thus happily presented to him, commanded the Look to be
translated into Arabic, and to be published for a guide to the Arabians in
matters pertaining to the stars. The task devolved on Muhammed ben
Ibkahi'm Alfazdri; whose version is kno^\^l to astronomers by the name of
ALGEBRA AMONG THE ARABIANS. Ixv
tlie greater Sind-hind or H'utd-sind: for the term occurs written both ways.'
It signifies, according to the same author Bex-al-Adami, the revolving
ages, Al dehr al ddher; which Casiri translates perpetuum aetemumque.*
No Sanscrit term of similar sound occurs, bearing a signification recon-
cilable to the Arabic interpretation. If a conjecture is to be hazarded, the
original word may have been Sidd'hdnta. Other guesses might be proposed:
partly combining sound with interpretation, and taking for a termination
sind'hu ocean, which occurs in titles now familiar for works relative to the
regulation of time, as Cdla-sind'hu, Samaya-sind'hu, &c. or adhering exclu-
sively to sound, as Indu-sindliu, or Jndu-siddhdnta; the last a title of the
same import with Suma-siddhdnta still current. But whatever may have
been the name, the system of astronomy, which was made known to the
Arabs, and which is by them distinguished by the appellation in question,
appears to have been that which is contained in the Brahma-sidd'hdnta, and
which is taught in Brahmeglpta's revision of it. This fact is deducible
from the number of elapsed da3s between the beginning of planetary mo-
tions and the commencement of the present age of the world, according to
the Indian reckoning, as it is quoted by the astrologer of Balkh Abu-mashar,
and which precisely agrees with Brahmegupta. The astrologer does not
indeed specify which of the Indian systems he is citing. But it is distinctly
affirmed by later Arabian authorities, that only one of the three Indian doc-
trines of astronomy was understood by the Arabs ; and that they had no
knowledge of the other two beyond their names.' Besides, Arvabhatta
and the Arca-sidd'/idnta, the two in question, would have furnished very
different numbers.
Tlic passage of Abu-mashar, to which reference has been now made, is
remarkable, and even important ; and, as it has been singularly misunder-
stood and grossly misquoted by Baillt in his Astronomic Ancieune (p. 302),
it may be necessary to cite it at full length in this place. It occurs at the
end of the fourth tract (and not, as Bailly quotes, the beginning of the
fifth,) in Abu-mashar's work on the conjunctions of planets. The author
there observes, that " the Indians reckoned the beginning [of the world] on
' Bai. ^rab. Hisp. citing Bibl. Arab. Vhil (Tdr'ikhu'l huhn/i) i. 428. voce Alphaz6ri.
* Ibid. i. 4.26. voce Katka. Sind and Hmd likewise signify, in the Arabian wrilers, the hither
«nd remoter India. D'Herbelot. Bibi. Orient. 415.
' T&rikki/l hukmA, cited by CASiar, Bibl. Arab. Hisp. i. 426. voce Katka.
k
Ixvi NOTES AND ILLUSTRATIONS.
" Sunday at sunrise (or, to quote from the Latin version, Et estimavcrunt
" Indi quod principium fuit die dominica sole ascendente;) and between that
" day and the day of the deluge (et est inter eos, s. inter ilium diem et ilium
" diem diluvii) 720634442715 days equivalent to 1900340938* Persian years
" and 344 days. The deluge happened on Friday (et fuit diluvium die
" veneris) 27th day of Rabe 1st, which is 29 from Cibat and 14 from Adris-
" tinich. Between the deluge and the first day of the year in which the
" Hejira occurred (fuerunt ergo inter diluvium et prinium diem anni in
" quo fuit Alhegira) 3837 years and 268 days; which will be, according to
" the years of tlie Persians, 3725 years and 348 days. And between the
" deluge and the day of Jesdagir (Yezdajerd) king of the Persians, from
" the beginning of whose reign the Persians took their era, 3735 years,
" 10 months, and 22 days." The author proceeds with the comparison of
the eras of the Persians and Arabians, and those of Alexaxdeii and Phi-
tiv ; and then concludes the treatise : completi sunt quatuor tractatus, deo
adjuvante.
Bailly's reference to this passage is in the following words. " Albu-
" MASAR* rapporte que selon les Indiens, il s'est 6coul6 720634442715 jours
" entre le deluge et T^poque de I'hegire. II en coiiclud, on ne sait trop com-
" ment, qu'il s'est 6coul6 3725 ans dans cet intervalle : ce qui placeroit le
" deluge 3103 ans avant J, C. pr^cisement <\, I'^poque chronologique et astro-
'• nomique des Indiens. Mais Albumasar ne dit point comment il est
" parvenu k 6galcr ces deux nombres de 3725 ans et de 720634442715 jours."
Ast. anc. eel. liv. i. § xvii.
Now on this it is to be observed, that Bailly makes the antediluvian
period between the Sunday on which the world began and the Friday on
which the deluge took place, comprising 720634442715 days, to be the same
with the postdiluvian period, from the deluge to the Hejira ; and that he
quotes the author, as unaccountably rendering that number equivalent to
.'3725 years, though the text expressly states more than igoOOOOOOO years.
The blunder is the more inexcusable, as Bailly himself remarked the in-
consistency, and should therefore have reexamined the text which he cited,
to verify his quotation.
* There is something wanting in the number of years: which is deficient at the third pl.ice.
Both editions of the translation (Augsburg 1489, Venice 1515) give the same words.
' De Magn. Conj. Traite v, au commencement.
ALGEBRA AMONG THE ARABIANS. Ixvii
Major "WiLFORD (As. Res. 10. ll?-)? relying on the correctness of
Bailly's quotation, concluded, that the error originated with either the
transcriber or translator. But in fact the mistake rested solely with the
citer: as he would have found if his attention had been drawn to the more
correct quotation in Anquetil du Perron's letter prefixed to his Rech.
Hist, et Geog. sur rinde, inserted in Bernoulli's 2d vol. of Desc. de rinde
(p. xx). But, though Anquetil is more accurate than Bailly in quota-
tion, he is not more successful in his inferences, guesses and surmises. For
he strangely concludes from a passage, which distinctly proves the use of
the great cycle of the culpa by the Indian astronomers to whom Abu-
MASHAR refers, that they were on the contrary unacquainted in those days
with a less cycle, which is comprehended in it. So little did he understand
the Indian periods, that he infers from a specified number of elapsed days
and correspondent years, reckoned from the beginning of the great cycle
which dates from the supposed moment of the commencement of the world,
that they knew nothing of a subordinate period, which is one of the ele-
ments of that cycle. Nor is he nearer the truth, but errs as much the other
way, in his conjecture, that the number of solar years stated by Abu-
MASHAR relates to the duration of a life of Brahma, comprising a hundred
of that deity's years.
In short, Anquetil's conclusions are as erroneous as Bailly's premises.
The discernment of Mr. Davis, to whom the passage was iiidicated by
Major WiLFOKD, anticipated the correction of this blunder of Bailly, by
restoring the text with a conjectural emendation worthy of his sag-acity.'
The name of the Indian author, from whom Abumashar derived the
particulars which he has furnished, is written by Bailly, Kankaraf; taken,
as he says, from an ancient Arabic writer, whose work is subjoined to that
of Messala published at Nuremberg by Joach. Heller in 1648." The
Latin translation of Messahala (Ma-sha'a-Allah) was edited by Joachim
Heller at Nuremberg in 1549; but it is not followed, in the only copy
accessible to me, by the work of any other Arabic author; and the quotation
consequently has not been verified. D'Herbelot writes the name vari-
ously; Kankah ox Cancah, Kenker ox Kankar, and Ketighek ox Kanghah ;^
' As. Res. 9. 242. Appendix to an Essay of Major Wilford.
* Ast. Anc. 303.
' Bibl. Or. Art. Cancah al Hendi, and Kenker al Hendi. Also Ketab Menazel al Caraar and
Ketab al Keranat.
k2
Ixviii NOTES AND ILLUSTRATIONS.
to which Reiske and Schultens, from further research, add another varia-
tion, iifeng-c//;* which is not of Arabic but Persian orthography. Casiri,
by a diflFerence of the diacritical point, reads from the Tarikhul hukma,
and transcribes, Katka.' That the same individual is all along meant,
clearly appears from the correspondence of the works ascribed to him;
especially his treatise on the greater and less conjunctions of the planets,
which was imitated by Abu-mashar.
Amidst so much diversity in the orthography of the word it is difficult
to retrieve the original name, without too much indulgence in conjecture.
Canca, Avhich comes nearest to the Arabic corruption, is in Sanscrit a proper
name among other significations : but it does not occur as the appellation of
any noted astrologer among the Hindus. Garga does; and, as the Arabs
have not the soft guttural consonant, they must widely corrupt that sound:
yet Catighar and Cancah seem too remote from it to allow it to be proposed
as a conjectural restoration of the Indian name.
• To return to the more immediate subject of this note. The work of
Alfazari, taken from the Hindu astronomy, continued to be in general use
among the Muhammedans, until the time of Alma'mu'n ; for whom it was
epitomized by Muhamjied ben Musa Al Khuxvarezmi; and his abridgment
was thenceforward known by the title of the less Sind-hind. It appears to
have been executed for the satisfaction of Aljia'mu'n before this prince's ac-
cession to the Khelafet, which took place early in the third century of the
Ilejira and ninth of Christ. The same author compiled similar astronomical
tables of his own ; wherein he professed to amend the Indian tables which
furnished the mean motions ; and he is said to have taken, for that purpose,
equations from the Persian astronomy ; some other matters from Ptolomy ;
and to have added something of his own on certain points. His work is
reported to have been well received by both Hindus and Muhammedans:
and the greater tables, of which the compilation was commenced in the fol-
lowing age by Bex al adami and completed by Al Casem, were raised
upon the like foundation of Indian astronomy : and were long in general use
among the Arabs, and by them deemed excellent. Another and earlier set
of astronomical tables, founded on the Indian system called Sind-hind, was
compiled by Habash an astronomer of Baghdad; who flourished in the
' Bibl. Or. (1777-79)- iv. 725. Should be Kengeh: a like error occurs in p. 727, where iharch
is put for thareh.
' Bibl. Arab. Hisp. i. 426.
ALGEBRA AMONG THE ARABIANS. . Ixix
time of the Khalif Alma'mux.' Several others, similarly founded on the
mean motions furnished by the same Indian system, were published in the
third century of Hejira or earlier: particularly those of Fazl ben Hatim
Narizi; and Al Hasan ben ^Misbah.*
It was no doubt at the same period, while the Arabs were gaining a
knowledge of one of the Indian systems of Astronomy, that they became
apprized of the existence of two others. No intimation at least occurs of
any different specific time or more probable period, when the information
was likely to be obtained by them ; than that in which they were busy with
the Indian astronomy according to one of the three systems that prevailed
among the Hindus: as the author of the Tarikhul hukmd quoted by
Casiri affirms. This writer, whose compilation is of the twelfth century,'
observes, that ' owing to the distance of countries and impediments to
' intercourse, scarcely any of the writings of the Hindus had reached the
' Arabians. There are reckoned, he adds, three celebrated systems (Mazhab)
' of astronomy among them ; namely, Sind and kind; Arjabahar, and Ar-
' cand: one only of which has been brought to us, namely, the Sind-hind:
' which most of the learned Muhammedans have followed.' After naming
the authors of astronomical tables founded on that basis, and assigning the
interpretation of the Indian title, and quoting the authority of Bex al adami,
the compiler of the latest of those tables mentioned by him, he goes on to
say, that ' of the Indian sciences no other communications have been re-
' ceived by us (Arabs) but a treatise on music of which the title in Hindi is
' Biydphar, and the signification of that title " fruit of knowledge;"* the
* work entitled Cal'dah and Damanah, upon ethics: and a book of numerical
* computation, which Abu Jafr Muhammed ben Musa Al Khuwdrezmi
' amplified (hasat) and which is a most expeditious and concise method, and
' testifies the ingenuity and acuteness of the Hindus.' '
The book, here noticed as a treatise on ethics, is the well-known collection
of fables of Filpai or Bidpai (Sans. Vaidyapriya) ; and was translated from
' T<fnA^u7 AuA7»({, Casiri, i. 426 and 428. Abulfaraj; Pococke 161.
* lb. i.42l and 413.
■^ He flourished in 595 H. (A. D. lips), as appears from passages of Iiis work, M.S.
MDCCLXXIII. Lib. Esc. p. 74 and 3l6. Canri, ii. 332.
* Sans. Vidy/iphala, fruit of science.
' Casiri, i. 426 and 428. The Cashful zanun specifies three astronomical systems of the
Hindus under the same names.
\xx NOTES AND ILLUSTRATIONS.
the Pehlevi version into Arabic, by command of the same Abbaside Khaltf
Almansu'r,* who caused an Indian Astronomical treatise to be translated
into the Arabian tongue. The Arabs, however, had other communications
of portions of Indian science, which the author of the Tarikhul hukmd has
in this place overlooked: especially upon medicine, on which many trea-
tises, general and particular, were translated from the Indian tougue. For
instance, a tract upon poisons by Shanac, (Sansc. Characa?) of which an
Arabic version was made for the Khalif Alma'mu'n, by his preceptor Abbas
ben SAfD Jdhari. Also a treatise on medicine and on materia medica in
particular, which bears the name of Shashurd (Sansc. Susruta); and nu-
merous others."
The Khuwarezmite Muhammed ben Musa, who is named as having
made known to the Arabians the Indian method of computation, is the same
"who is recognized by Arabian authors with almost a common consent (Zaca-
hia of Casbin, &c.) as the first who wrote upon Algebra. His competitor for
the honour of priority is Abu Ka'mil Shujaa ben Aslam, surnamed the
Egyptian arithmetician, (Hasib al Misri,) ; whose treatise on Algebra was
commented by Ali ben Ahmed Al AmrAni of Musella;^ and who is said by
D'Herbelot to have been the first among learned Muslemans, that wrote
upon this branch of mathematics.* The commentator is a writer of the tenth
century; the date of his decease being recorded as of 344 H.' (A. D. 955.)
The age, in which his author flourished, or the date of his text, is not fur-
nished by any authority which has been consulted : and unless some evidence
be found, showing that he was anterior to the Khuwarezfni, we may
abide by the historical authority of Zacarta of Casbin; and consider the
Khuwdrezmi as the earliest writer on Algebra in Arabic. Next was the
celebrated Alchindus (Abu Yusef Alkendi) contemporary with the astro-
loger Abu-masher in the third century of the Hejira and ninth of the
Christian era,* an illustrious philosopher versed in the sciences of Greece, of
• Introd. llem. Hitopadtsa. Sansc. ed. 1804.
* D'Hekbelot, Bibl. Orient. Ketab al saraoun, Ketab Sendhascbat, Ketab al sokkar, Ketab
Schaschourd al Hendi, Kftab Rai al Hendi, Ketab Noufschal al Hendi, Ketab al akakir, &c.
* Tdrikhu'l hukmd, Casiui, i. 410.
♦ Bibl. Orient. 482. Also 226 and 494. No grounds are specified. Eev Khalca'n and
Ha'ji Kiialfah, whom he very commonly follows, have been searched in vain for authority on
this point.
» Tdr. Casiri, i. 410. • Abvlfaraj; Pococke, 179.
ALGEBRA AMONG THE ARABIANS. Ixxi
India, and of Persia, and author of several treatises upon numbers. In the
prodigious multitude of his writings upon every branch of science, one is
specified as a tract on Indian computation (Hisabul hindi): others occur
with titles which are understood by Casiri to relate to Algebra, and to the
' finding of hidden numbers :' but which seem rather to appertain to other
topics.* It is, however, presumable, that one of the works composed by
him did treat of Algebra as a branch of the science of computation. His
pupil Ahmed ben ]\Iuhammed of Sarkhasi in Persia, (who flourished in the
middle of the third century of the Hejira, for he died in 286 H.) was author
of a complete treatise of computation embracing Algebra with Arithmetic.
About the same time a treatise of Algebra was composed by Abu Hanifah
Daindwari, who lived till 290 H. (A. D. c)03.)
At a later period Abu'lwafa' Biizjdni, a distinguished mathematician, who
flourished in the fourth century of the Hejira, between the years 348 when
he commenced his studies, and 388 the date of his demise, composed nume-
rous tracts on computation, among which are specified several commentaries
on Algebra: One of them on the treatise of the Khuwarezmite upon that sub-
ject : another on a less noted treatise by Abu Yahya, whose lectures he had
attended : an interpretation (whether commentary or paraphrase may per-
haps be doubted) of the work of Diophantus : demonstrations of the pro-
positions contained in that work : a treatise on numerical computation in
general: and several tracts on particular branches of this subject."
A question has been raised, as just now hinted, whether this writer's inter-
pretation of Diophantus is to be deemed a translation or a commentary.
The term, which is here employed in the Tdrikhul hukmd, (Jafsir, para-
phrase,) and that which Abulfaraj uses upon the same occasion (fasr,
interpreted,) are ambiguous. Applied to the relation between works in the
same language, the term, no doubt, implies a gloss or comment; and is so
understood in the very same passage where an interpretation of the Khu-
warezmite's treatise, and another of Abu Yahva's, were spoken of. But,
where a difference of language subsists, it seems rather to intend a ver-
sion, or at least a paraphrase, than mere scholia ; and is employed by the
same author in a passage before cited,' where he gives the Arabic sig-
nification of a Hindi term. That Buzjdnis, performance is to be deemed a
• Tdrikhu'l hukmd ; Casihi, i, 353—360. * lb, i. 433. ' lb. i. 426. Art. Katka.
Ixxii NOTES AND ILLUSTRATIONS.
translation, appears to be fairly inferrible from the separate mention of the
demonstration of the propositions in Dioph antus, as a distinct work : for the
latter seems to be of the nature of a commentary ; and the other consequently
is the more likely to have been a version, whether literal or partaking of
paraphrase. Besides, there is no mention, by any Arabian writer, of an
earlier Arabic translation of Diopii antus; and the Buzj&ni was not likely to
be the commentator in Arabic of an untranslated Greek book. D'Herbelot
then may be deemed correct in naming him as the translator of the Arithme-
tics of DioPHANTUs; and Cossali, examining a like question, arrives at
nearly the same conclusion; namely, that the Buzjdni was the translator,
and the earliest, as well as the expositor, of Diophantus. — (Orig. deW Alg.
i. 175.) The version was probably made soon after the date, which Abul-
FARAJ assigns to it, 348 H. (A. D. 969), which more properly is the date of
the commencement of the translator's mathematical studies.
From all these facts, joined with other circumstances to be noticed in pro-
gress of this note, it is inferred, 1st, that the acquaintance of the Arabs with
the Hindu astronomy is traced to the middle of the second century of the
Plejira, in the reign of Almansur; upon authority of Arabian historians
citing that of the preface of ancient astronomical tables : while their know-
ledge of the Greek astronomy does not appear to have commenced until the
subsequent reign of Ha'run Alrashid, when a translation of the Almagest
is said to have been executed under the auspices of the Barmacide Yahya
ben Kha'led, by Aba hia'n and Salama employed for the purpose.' 2dly,
That they were become conversant, in the Indian method of numerical com-
putation, within the second century; that is, before the beginning of the
reign of Alma'mu'n, whose accession to the Khelafet took place in 205 H.
3dly, That the first treatise on Algebra in Arabic was published in his reign ;
but their acquaintance with the work of Diophantus is not traced by any
historical facts collected from their writings to a period anterior to the middle
of the fourth century of the Hejira, when Abu'lwafa' Buzjdni flourished.
4thly, That Muhammed ben Musa Khuwdrezmi, the same Arabic author,
who, in the time of Alma'mu'n, and before his accession, abridged an earlier
astronomical work taken from the Hindus, and who published a treatise on
the Indian method of numerical computation, is the first also who furnished
^ • Casiai, i. 349.
ALGEBRA AMONG THE ARABIANS. , Ixxiii
the Arabs with a knowledge of Algebra, upon which he expressly wrote, and
in that Khalif s reign : as will be more particularly shown, as we proceed.
A treatise of Algebra bearing his name, it may be here remarked, was in
the hands of the Italian Algebraists, translated into the Italian language,
not very long after the introduction of the science into that country by
Leonardo of Pisa. It appears to have been seen at a later period both by
Cardan and by BoiMBELLi. No manuscript of that version is, however,
now extant; or at least known to be so.
Fortunately a copy of the Arabic original is preserved in the Bodleian
collection. It is the manuscript marked CMXVIII Hunt. £14. fo. and
bearing the date of the transcription 743 H. (A. D. 1342.) The rules of
the library, though access be readily allowed, preclude the study of any
book which it contains, by a person not enured to the temperature of apart-
ments unvisited by artificial warmth. This impediment to the examination
of the manuscript in question has been remedied by the assistance of the
under librarian Mr. Alexander Nicoll; who has furnished ample extracts
purposely transcribed by him from the manuscript. This has made it practi-
cable to ascertain the contents of the book, and to identify the work as that
in which the Khivwarezmi taught the principles of Algebra; and conse-
quently to compare the state of the science, as it was by him taught, with its
utmost progress in the hands of the Muhammedans, as exhibited in an ele-
mentary work of not very ancient date, which is to this time studied among
Asiatic Muslcmans.
I allude to the Khuldsetn'l hisah of Behau'ldin; an author, who lived
between the years 9-53 and 1031 H. The Arabic text, with a Persian com-
mentary, has been printed in Calcutta; and a summary of its contents had
been previously given by Mr. Strachey in his " Early History of Algebra,"
in which, as in his other exertions for the investigation of Hindu and Ara-
bian Algebra, his zeal surmounted great difficulties ; while his labours have
thrown much light upon the subject.'
The title page of the manuscript above described, as well as a marginal
note on it, and the author's preface, all concur in declaring it the work of
MuHAMMED ben MusA Khuwdrezmi : and the mention of the Khabf Alma-
• ^ee Bija Ganita, or Algebra of the Hindus; London, 1813. Hutton's Math. Diet. Ed.
1815. Art. Algebra: and As. Res. 12. 159-
I
Ixxiv NOTES AND ILLUSTRATIONS.
MUX in that preface, establishes the identity of the author, whose various
works, as is learned from Arabian historians, were composed by command, or
with encouragement, of that Khalif, partly before his accession, and partly
during his reign.
The preface, a transcript of which was supplied by the care of Mr.
NicoLL, has been examined at my recjuest, by Colonel John Baillte.
After perusing it with him, I am enabled to atlirm, that it intimates " en-
couragement from the Imam Almamu'n Commander of the Faithful, to
compile a compendious treatise of calculation by Algebra;" terms, which
amount not only to a disclaimer of any pretensions to the invention of the
Algebraic art; but which would to my apprehension, as to that of the distin-
guished Arabic scholar consulted, strongly convey the idea of the pre-
existeuce of ampler treatises upon Algebra in the same language (Arabic),
did not the marginal note above cited distinctly assert this to be " the first
treatise composed upon Algebra among the faithful;" an assertion corrobo-
rated by the similar affirmation of Zacaria of Casbin, and other writers
of Arabian history. Adverting, however, to that express affirmation, the
author must be here understood as declaring that he compiled (alaj' is the
verb used by him) the treatise upon Algebra from books in some other lan-
guage: doubtless then in the Indian tongue; as it has been already shown,
that he was conversant with Hindu astronomy, and Hinducomputation and
account. ,.:::; i ;■ .
It may be right to notice, that the title of the manuscript denominates the
author " Abu abdullah Muiiammed ben Musa al Khuwdrezmi, differ-
ing in the first part of the name from the designation, which occurs in one
passage of the Tdrikhul hukmd, quoted by Casiri, where the Khuwdrezmi
MuHAMMED ben Musa is called Abu-jafr.^ But that is not a sufficient
ground for questioning the sameness of persons and genuineness of the
work, as the Khuxcdrezmi is not usually designated by cither of those addi-
tions, or by any other of that nature taken from the name of offspring: and
error may be presumed ; most probably on the part of the Egyptian author
of the Tdrikhul hukmd, since the addition, which he introtluces, that of
Abu-jafr, belongs to IMuhammed ben Musa ben Shaker, a very different
person; as appears from another passage of the same Egyptian's compilation."
• Casiri, i. 428. ' Casiri,!. 418.
ALGEBIL'^ AMONG TPIE ARABIANS. Ixxr
The following is a translation of the Khuwdrezmts directions for the solu-
tion of equations : simple and compound: atopic, which he enters upon at no
great distance from the commencement of the volume: having first treated
of unity and number in general.
' I found, that the numbers, of which there is need in computation by
restoration and comparison,' are of three kinds; namely, roots and squares,
and simple number relative to neither root nor square. A root is the whole
of thing multiplied by [root] itself, consisting of unity, or numbers ascending,
or fractions descending. A square is the whole amount of root multiplied into
itself And simple number is the whole that is denominated by the number
without reference to root or square.
' Of these three kinds, which are equal, some to some, the cases are these :
for instance, you say " squares are equal to roots;" and " squares are equal to
numbers;" and " roots are equal to numbers."
' As to the case in which squares are equal to roots; for example, " a square
is equal to five roots of the same:" the root of the square is five; and the
square is twenty-five: and that is equivalent to five times its root.
' So you say " a third of the square is equal to four roots:" the whole
square then is equal to twelve roots; and that is a hundred and forty-four;
its root is twelve.
' Another example : you say " five squares are equal to ten roots." Then
one square is equal to two roots: and the root of the square is two; and the
square is four.
' In like manner, whether the squares be many or few, they are reduced to
a single square : and as much is done to the equivalent in roots ; reducing it
to the like of that to which the square has been brought.
* Case in which squares are equal to numbers: for instance, you say, " the
square is equal to nine." Then that is the square, and the root is three.
And you say " five squares are equal to eighty :" then one square is a fifth of
eighty; and that is sixteen. And, if you say, " the half of the square is
equal to eighteen:" then the square is equal to thirty-six; and its root is six.
' In like manner, with all squares affirmative and negative, you reduce
them to a single square. If there be less than a square, you add thereto,
until the square be quite complete. Do as much with the equivalent in
numbers,
* Hisdbi^ljebr iva al mukibahk.
12
Ixxvi NOTES AND ILLUSTRATIONS,
' Case in which roots are equal to number: for instance, you say " the root
equals three in number." Then the root is three; and the square, which is
raised therefrom, is nine. And, if you say " four roots are equal to twenty;"
then a single root is equal to five; and the square, that is raised tl)erefrom, is
twenty-five. And, if you say " the half of the root is equal to ten;" then the
[whole] root is equal to twenty ; and the square, which is raised therefrom, is
four hundred.
' I found, that, with these three kinds, namely, roots, squares, and number
compound, there will be three compound sorts [of equation]; that is, squares
and roots equal to number ; squares and number equal to roots ; and roots
and number equal to squares.
' As for squares and roots, which are equal to number: for example, you
say " square, and ten roots of the same, amount to the sum of thirty-nine."
Then the solution of it is : you halve the roots ; and that in the present
instance yields five. Then you multiply this by its like, and the product is
twenty-five. Add this to thirty-nine: the sum is sixty-four. Then take
the root of this, which is eight, and subtract from it half the roots, namely,
five ; the remainder is three. It is the root of the square which you re-
quired ; and the square is nine.
' In like manner, if two squares be specified, or three, or less, or more, re-
duce them to a single square ; and reduce the roots and number therewith to
the like of that to which you reduced the square.
' For example, you say " two squares and ten roots are equal to forty-
eight dirhems :" and the meaning is, any two [such] squares, when they are
summed and unto them is added the equivalent of ten times the root of one
of them, amount to the total of forty-eight dirhevis. Then you must reduce
the two squares to a single square: and assuredly you know, that one of two
squares is a moiety of both. Then reduce the whole thing in the instance to
its half: and it is as much as to say, a square and five roots are equal to
twenty-four dirhems ; and the meaning is, any [such] square, when five of
its roots are added to it, amounts to twenty-four. Then halve the roots, and
the moiety is two and a half. Multiply that by its like, and the product is
six and a quarter. Add this to twenty-four, the sum is thirty dirhems and a
quarter. Extract the root, it is five and a half. Subtract from this the
moiety of the roots; that is, two and a half: the remainder is three. It is
the root of the square: and the square is nine.
ALGEBRA AMONG THE ARABIANS. ixxvii
* In like manner, if it be said " half of the square and five roots are equal
to twenty-eight dirhems." It signifies, that, when you add to the moiety of
any [such] square the equivalent of five of its roots, the amount is twenty-
eight dirham. Then you desire to complete your square so as it shall
amount to one whole square ; that is, to double it. Therefore double it,
and double what you have with it; as well as what is equal thereunto!
Then a square and ten roots are equal to fifty-six dirhems. Add half the
roots multiplied by itself, twenty-five, to fifty-six ; and the sum is eighty-one
Extract the root of this, it is nine. Subtract from this the moiety of the
roots ; that is, five : the remainder is four. It is the root of the square which
you required: and the square is sixteen; and its moiety is eight.
' Proceed in like manner with all that comes of squares and roots • and
what number equals them. '
' As for squares and number, which are equal to roots ; for example, you
say. a square and twenty-one are equal to ten of its roots :" the meaning of
which IS, any [such] square, when twenty-one dirhems are added to it
amounts to what is the equivalent of ten roots of that square: then the solu-
tion IS, halve the roots; and the moiety is five. Multiply this by itself the
product IS twenty-five. Then subtract from it twenty-one, the number'spe-
cified with the square: the remainder is four. Extract its root; which is
two. Subtract this from the moiety of the roots; that is, from five- the re-
mainder IS three. It is the root of the square which you required :' and the
square ,s nine. Or, if you please, you may add the root to the moiety of the
roots, the sum is seven. It is the root of the square which you required-
and the square is forty-nine. '
' When a case occurs to you, which you bring under this head try its
answer by the sum: and, if that do not serve, it certainly will by the dif-
ference. This head is wrought both by the sum and by the difference Not
so either of the others of three cases requiring for their solution that the root
be ha ved And know, that, under this head, when the roots have been
halved, and the moiety has been multiplied by its like, if the amount of the
prcKluct be less than the dirhems which are with the square, then the instance
IS impossible: and, if it be equal to the dirhems between them, tlie root of
the square is like tiie moiety of the roots, without either addition or sub-
traction.
' In every instance where you have two squares, or more or less, reduce to
a Single square, as I explained under the first head.
Ixxviii NOTES AND ILLUSTRATIONS.
' As for roots anti number, which are equal to squares: for example, you
say, " three roots and four in number are equal to a square:" tlie solution of
it is, halve the roots; and the moiety will be one and a half Multiply this
by its like, [the product is two and a quarter. Add it to four, the sum is six
and a quarter. Extract the root, which is two and a half To this add the
moiety of the roots. The sum is four. It is the root of the square which
you required: and the square is sixteen.]'
The author retunis to the subject in a distinct chapter, which is entitled
" On the six cases of Algebra." A short extract from it may suffice.
'The first of the six cases. For example, you say, " you divide ten into
two parts, and multiply one of the two parts by the other: then you multiply
one of them by itself, and the product of this multiplication into itself is
equal to four times that of one of the parts by the other."
' Solution. Make one of the two parts thing, and the other ten less thing:
then multiply thing by ten less thing, and the product will be ten things less
a square. Multiply by four: for you said "four times." It will be four
times the product of one part by the other ; that is, forty things less four
squares. Now multiply thing by thing, which is one of the parts by itself:
the result is, square e(iual to forty things less four squares. Then restore it
in the four squares, and add it to the one square. There will be forty things
equal to five squares ; and a single square is equal to eight roots. It is
sixty-four ; and its root is eight : and that is one of the two parts, which was
multipled into itself: and the remainder often is two; and that is the other
part. Thus has this instance been solved under one of the six heads : and
that is the case of squares equal to roots.
' The second case. " You divide ten into two parts, and multiply the
amount of a part into itself Then multiply ten into itself; and the product
of this multiplication often into itself, is equivalent to twice the product of
the part taken into itself, and seven ninths: or it is equivalent to six times
and a quarter tlie product of the other part taken into itself.
' Solution. Make one of the parts thing, and the other ten less thifig.
Then you multiply thing into itself: it is a square. Next by two and seven
ninths: the product will be two squares, and seven ninths of a square. Then
multiply ten into itself, and the product is a hundred. Reduce it to a single
square, the result is nine twenty-fiths; that is, a fifth and four fifths of a fifth.
Take a fifth of a hundred and four fifths of a fifth, the quotient is thirty-six,
I
ALGEBRA AMONG THE ARABIANS. Ixxix
which is equal to one square. Then extract tne root, which is six. It is one
of the two parts; and the other is undoubtedly four. Thus you solve this
instance under one of the six heads : and that is " squares equal to number."
These extracts may serve to convey an adequate notion of the manner, in
which the Khuwdrezmi conducts the resolution of equations simple and
compound, and the investigation of problems by their means. If a compari-
son be made with the Khulasetu'l hisdb, of which a summary by Mr.
Strachey will be found in the researches of the Asiatic society," it may be
seen, that the Algebraic ait has been nearly stationary in the hands of the
Muhammedans, from the days of Muhammed of Khwwdrtzm^ to those of
Beha'u'ldi'.v of Aamul,^ notwithstanding the intermediate study of the
arithmetics of Diophantus, translated and expounded by Muhajimed of
Buzjdn. Neither that comparison, nor the exclusive consideration of the
Khuwdrezmi s performance, leads to any other conclusion, than, as before in-
timated, that, being conversant with the sciences of the Hindus, especially
with their astronomy and their method of numerical calculation, and being
the author of the earliest Arabic treatise on Algebra, he must be deemed to
have learnt from the Hindus the resolution of simple and quadratic equations,
or, in short, Algebra, a branch of their art of computation.
The conclusion, at which we have arrived, may be strengthened by the
coincident opinion of Cossali, who, after diligent research and ample disqui-
sition, comes to the following result.*
' Concerning the origin of Algebra among the Arabs, what is certain is,
that Muhammed ben Musa the Khuwdrezmite first taught it to them. The
Casb'inian, a writer of authority affirms it; no historical fact, no opinion, no
reasoning, opposes it.
' There is nothing in history respecting Muhammed hen Musa indi-
vidually, which favours the opinion, that he took from the Greeks, the Alge-
bra, which he taught to the Muhammedans.
* History presents in him no other than a mathematician of a country most
distant from Greece and contiguous to India; skilled in the Indian tongue;
fond of Indian matters: which he translated, amended, epitomised, adorned:
and he it was, who was the first instructor of the Muhammedans in the Alge-
braic art.'
• Vol. 12. * On the Oxus. ' A district of Syria; not Amal a town in K/iur/tsiJii. Com.
♦ Orig. deWAtg. i. 2l6. » Orig. ddl'Alg. i. 219.
•V
Ixxx NOTES AND ILLUSTRATIONS.
' Not havin<>^ taken Algebra from the Greeks, he must have either invented
it himself, or taken it from the ImUans. Of the two, the second appears to
me the most probable.'^
o.
COMMUNICATION OF THE HINDUS WTFH WESTERN
NATIONS ON ASTROLOGY AND AGRONOMY.
The position, that Astrology is partly of foreign growth in India; that is,
that the Hindus have borrowed, and largely too, from the astrology of a
more western region, is grounded, as the similar inference concerning a dif-
ferent branch of divination," on the resemblance of certain terms employed
in both. The mode of divination, called Tdjaca, implies by its very name
its Arabian origin. Astrological prediction by configuration of planets, in
like manner, indicates even by its Indian name a Grecian source. It is
denominated Hord, the second of three branches which compose a complete
course of astronomy and astrology :' and the word occurs in this sense in the
writings of early Hindu astrologers. Vara'ha-mihika, whose name stands
high in this class of writers, has attempted to supply a Sanscrit etymology;
and in his treatise on casting nativities derives the word from Ahordtra,
day and night, a nycthemeron. This formation of a word by dropping both
the first and last syllables, is not conformable to the analogies of Sanscrit ety-
mology. It is more natural then to look for the origin of the term in a
foreign tongue: and that is presented by the Greek <J'fa and its derivative
wf oo-xoTT^, an astrologer, and especially one who considers the natal hour, and
hence predicts events.* The same term hard occurs again in the writings of
the Hindu astrologers, with an acceptation (that of hour') which more
exactly conforms to the Grecian etymon.
The resemblance of a single term would not suffice to giound an inference
of common origin, since it might be purely accidental. But other words are
also remarked in Hindu astrology, which are evidently not Indian. An in-
• See his reasons at large. * As. Res. 9. 3/6. ' Sec Note K.
♦ Hes^ch. and Suid. » .\s. Res. 5. XOJ.
COMMUNICATION ON ASTROLOGY, &c. Ixxxi
stance of it is dreshcdna,^ used in the same astrological sense with the Greek
SixMi^ and Latin decanus : words, which, notwithstanding their classic sound,
are to be considered as of foreign origin (Chaldean or Egyptian) in the classic
languages, at least with this acceptation.^ The term is assuredly not genuine
Sanscrit; and hence it was before* inferred, that the particular astrological
doctrine, to which it belongs, is exotic in India. It appears, however, that
this division of the twelve zodiacal signs into three portions each, with
planets governing tliem, and pourtrayed figures representing tlieni, is not im-
plicitly the same among the Hindu astrologers, which it was among the Chal-
deans, with whom the £g3'ptians and Persians coincided. Variations have
been noticed.' Other points of difference are specified by the astrologer of
Ballch* and they concern the allotment of planets to govern the decani and
dreshcdnas, and the figures by which they are represented. Abu-mashar is a
writer of the ninth century;* and his notice of this astrological division of
the zodiac as received by Hindus, Chaldeans, and Egyptians, confirms the
fact of an earlier communication between the Indians and the Chaldeans, per-
haps the Egyptians, on the subject of it.
With the sexagesimal fractions, the introduction of which is by Wallis
ascribed to Ptolomy among the the Greeks,' the Hindus have adopted for
the minute of a degree, besides a term of their own language, cala, one taken
from the Greek Xt-rrlx scarcely altered in the Sanscrit Uptd. The term must
be deemed originally Greek, rather than Indian, in that acceptation, as it
there corresponds to an adjective Xnr]^, slender, minute: an import which
precisely agrees wth the Sanscrit cald and Arabic dak'tk, fine, minute; whence,
in these languages respectively, cald and dak'ik for a minute of a degree.
But the meanings of Uptd in Sanscrit^ are, 1st, smeared; 2d, infected with
poison; 3d, eaten: and its derivative /i/>/f«ca signifies a poisoned arrow, being
derived from Up, to smear: and the dictionaries give no interpretation of the
word that has any affinity with its special acceptation as a technical term in
astronomy and mathematics. Yet it occurs so employed in the work of
Brahmegupta.'
By a different analogy of the sense and not the sound, the Greek in-oX^a, a
• As. Res. 9. 36'7. » Ibid. Vide Sulm. Exerc. Plin. ^ Jbid. 9- 374.
* Lib. intr. in Ast. Albumasis Abalachi, 5. 12 and 13.
' Died in 272 H. (885 C.) aged a hundred.
« Wallis. Alg. c. 7. ^ Am. Coth. » C. 1. § 6, et passim.
m
Ixxxii .0/ NOTES AND ILLUSTRATIONS.
part, and' specially addgree of a circle,^is in Sanscrit anio, bh/iga, and other
synonyma of part, applied emphatically in technical language to the 360th
part of the periphery of a circle. The resemblance of the radical sense, in
the one instance, tends to corroborate the inference from the similarity of
sound in the other. fi
Cendra is used by Brahmegupta and the Surya-sidd' hanta, as well as
other astronomical writers (Bha'scaua, &c.), and by the astrologers Vaua'ha-
MiHiRA and the rest, to signify the equation of the centre.' The same term
is employed in the Indian mensuration for the centre of a circle ;* also
denoted by medliya, middle. It comes so near in sound, as in signification,
to the Greek xfWfop, tliat the inference of a common origin for these words
is not to be avoided. But in Sanscrit it is exclusively technical ; it is
unnoticed by the vocabularies of the language; and it is not easily traced
to a Sanscrit root. In Greek, on the contrary, the correspondent term was
borrowed in mathematics from a familiar word signifying a goad, spur, thorn,
or point ; and derived from a Greek theme xti1««.
The other term, which has been mentioned as commonly used for the
centre of a circle, namely med'hya, middle, is one of the numerous instances
of radical and primary analogy between the Sanscrit and the Latin and
Greek languages. It is a common word of the ancient Indian tongue ; and
is clearly tlie same with the Latin medius; and serves to show that the
Latin is nearer to tlie ancient pronunciation of Greek, than /aeV^ ; from
which SiPONTiNus derives it; but which must be deemed a coirupted or
softened utterance of an ancient term coming nearer to the Sanscrit med'hyas
and Latin medius. -a
On a hasty glance over the JAtacas or Indian treatises upon horoscopes,
several other terms of the art have been noticed, which are not Sanscrtt, but
apparently barbarian. For instance anapha, suiiapha, dui'iidhara, and
ceviadrnma, designating certain configurations of tlie planets. They occur
in both the treatises of Vaka'ua-mihira ; and a passage, relative to this sub-
ject, is among those quoted from the abridgment by the scholiast of the
greater treatise, and verified in the text of the less.* The affinity of those
• Brahm. sidcT/i. c. 2. Sur. Sidd'/i. c. 2. Vr'ihat and Laghu Mtacas. ' Sur. on L'll. § 207-
' See p. xlix. Another passage so quoted and verified uses the terra cendra in the sense above-
mentioned.
COMMUNICATION ON ASTROLOGY, &c. Ixxxiii
terms to words of other languages used in a similar astrological sense, has not
been traced: for want, perhaps, of competent acquaintance with tlie tiermi-
nology of that ; silly art. But it must not be passed unremarked, that
Varaha-mihira, who hag ui another place praised the Yavanas for their
proficiency in astrology (or astronomy ; for the term is ambigiious ;) fre-
quently quotes them in his great treatise on horoscopes: and his scholiast
marks a distinction between the ancient Yavanas, whom he characterises as
" a race of barbarians conversant with (Iwrd) horoscopes," and a known
Sanscrit author bearing the title, of Yavaniis'wara, whose work he had seen
and repeatedly cites ; but the writings and doctrine of the ancient Yavanas,
he acknowledges, had not been seen by him, ^nd were known to him only by
this writer's and his own author's references.
No argument, bearing upon the point under consderation, is built on
Bha'scara's use of the word dramina for the value of 64 cowry-shells {Ltl.
§2.) in place of the proper Sanscrit term />7'tf;//««a, . which Suid'hara and
other Hindu authors employ ; nor on the use of dindra, for a denomination
of money, by the scholiast of Brahmegupta (12 § 12.) who also, like
Bha'scara, employs the first mentioned word (12. § 14.): though tl-e one is
clearly analogous to the Greek drachma, a word of undoubted Grecian ety-
mology, being derived from ^f alrojuai ; and the other apparently is so, to the
Roman denarius which has a Latin derivation. The first has not even the
Sanscrit air ; and is evidently an exotic, or, in short, a barbarous term. It
was probably received mediately through the Muhammedans, who have
their dirhem in the like sense. The other is a genuine Sanscrit word, of
which the etymology, presenting the sense of ' splendid,' is consistent with
the several acceptations of a specific weight of gold ; a golden ornament or
breast-piece; and gold money : all which senses it bears, according to the
ancient vocabularies of the lansruasre.*
The similarity seems then to be accidental in this instance ; and the Mu-
hammedans, who have also a like term, may have borrowed it on either
hand: not improbably from the Hindus, as the dinar of the Arabs and Per-
sians is a gold coin like the Indian ; while the Roman denarius is properly a
silver one. D'Herbelot assigns as a reason for deriving the Arabic dindr
from the Roman denarius, that this was of gold. The nummus aureus some-
' Amera-cosha, Sec.
m2
Ixxxiv NOTES AND ILLUSTRATIONS.
times had that designation ; and we read in Roman authors of golden as well
as silver denarii.^ But it is needless to multiply references and quotations
to prove, that the Roman coin of that name was primarily silver, and so
denominated because it was equal in value to ten copper a*;* tliat it was all
along the name of a silver coin;' and was still so under the Greek empire,
when the irty»gK>ti was the hundredth part of a large silver coin termed
dfyupa!*
» Plin. 33. § 13, and 37 § 3. Petron. Satyr. 106. l60.
• rim. 33. 13 VUr. 3. 1. Voliu. Mxcimus. Didyraus.
' Vitr. and Vol. Maec. * Epiphanius, cum raultis aliis.
INDIAN
aritljmetic anti Algebra*
CHAPTER I.
INTRODUCTION.
1. Having bowed to the deity, whose head is Hke an elephant's;'
whose feet are adored by gods ; who, when called to mind, relieves his vota-
ries from embarrassment ; and bestows happiness on his Avorshippers ; I
propound this easy process of computation,' delightful by its elegance,*
perspicuous with words concise, soft and correct, and pleasing to the learned.
AXIOMS.
[consisting in definitions gf technical terms.]
[Money by Tale.]
2. Twice ten cowry shells* are a c^cini ; four of these are apana; sixteen
of which must be here considered as a dramma ; and in like manner, a nishca,
as consisting of sixteen of these.
Gan'es'a, represented with an elephant's head and human body.
Pdt'i-ganita ; ji&t'i, paripdti, or vyacia-ganj^rt, arithmetic.
* Lildvati delightful : an allusion to the title of the book. See notes on § 13 and 277.
♦ Cypiaea moneta. Sans. Vara'taca, capardi ; Hind. Cauri.
B
2 LI'LAVATI'. . . Chapter I.
[FFdglKs.]
3. A gunja^ (or seed of Abrus) is reckoned ccjual to two barley-corns ; a
•calla, to two gunjas; and eight of tiiose are » iJmrana ; two of which
make a gadydtiaca. In like manner one dha'taca is composed of fourteen
vallas. '
4. Half ten gunjas are called a mAsha,'' by such as are conversant with
the use of the balance : a carsha contains sixteen of what are termed mdshas;
a pala, four carshas. A carsha of gold is named suverna.
[Measures.}
5 — 6. Eight breadths of a barley-coni' are here a finger ; four times six
fingers, a cubit ;* four cubits, a staflF;' and a crosa contains two thousand of
these ; and a ydjana, four crosas.
So a banibu pole consists of ten cubits ; and a field (or plane figure)
bounded by four sides, measuring twenty bambu poles, is a nivartana."
7, A cube,'' which in length, breadth and thickness measures a -cubit, is
termed a solid cubit : and, in the meting of com and the like, a measure.
• A seed of Abrus precatorius : black or red ; the one called crishtiala ; the other racti, racticd
or ratticd; whence Hind, ratti.
' Physicians reckon seven gunjas to the m&slia; lawyers, seven and a half. The same weight is
intended ; and the difference of description arises only from counting by heavier or lighter seeds
of Abrus : in like manner as the earth is the same, whether rated at 3300 ydjanas ; or, with the
Siromani, 4967 ; or, according to others, 6522. Gan.
^ Eight barley-corns (yma) by breadth, or three grains of rice by length, a,K equal to one finger
(angttla). Gan'.
* Haifa, cara and synonyma of hand or fore arm. According to the commentator Gan'e's'a, this
intends the practical cubit as received by artisans, and vulgarly called gaj [or gaz]. It is nearer
to the yard than to the true cubit : but the commentator seems to have no sufficient ground for
so enlarging the cubit.
5 Dan'da, a staff: directed to be cut nearly of man's height. 'Mb»u, S. 46,
" A superficial measure or area containing 400 square poles. Sur.
' Du&dai&sri, lit. dodecagon, but meaning a parallelopipedon ; the term asra, corner or angle,
being here applied to the edge or line of incidence of two planes. See Cuaturve'da on Brah-
MEOUPTA, §6.
WEIGHTS AND MEASURES. 3
which contains a solid cubit, is a c'hari of Magad'ha ' as it is denominated
in science.
8. A drofia is the sixteenth part of a chart; an ad'haca is a quarter of a
drbna ; a. pros f ha is a fourth part of an ad'haca ; and a cudaba'' is by the
ancients' termed a quarter of a prasfha*
The rest of the axioms, relative to tiine* and so forth, are familiarly
known.*
' The country or province situated on the Sonebhadra river. — Gan. It is South Bihar. See,
concerning other c'hdri measures, a note on § 236.
* ' In the Cutapa, the depth is a finger and a half; the length and breadth, each, three.'
Seid'hara a'cha'rta cited by Ganga'd'hara and Su'ryada'sa. ' The cutapa or ctidaba is a
wooden measure containing 13 J c\ih\c angulas ; thepr<ut'/ia, (four times as many) 54; the ffd'haca,
2] 6; the droiia, 864; the c'h&ri, 13824.'— Gang, and Su'r. See As. Res. vol. 5, p. 102.
* By Sri'd'hara and the rest. Sun.
■* Another stanza, (an eighth, on the subject of weights and measures,) occurs in one copy of
the text; and that number is indicated in the Manoranjana. But the commentaries of Ganesa
and Su'ryada'sa specify seven, and Ganga'd'hara alone expounds the additional stanza. It is
therefore to be rejected as spurious, and interpolated : not being found in other copies of the text.
The subject of it is the mana (mati) of forty setas (ser) ; which, as a measure of com by weight,
is ascribed to the Turushcas or Muhammedans of India ; the people of Yacana-desa, as the com-
mentator terms them.
" The seta* is here reckoned at twice seven tancas, each equal to three-fourths oia. gadydnaca:
and a mana, at forty setas. The name is in use among the Turushcas, for a weight of com and like
articles." See notes on § 97 and 236.
' The author has himself explained the measures of time in the astronomical part of his treatise.
(Sidd'h&nta-siromam, S l6-l 8.J Gang, and Su'r.
• Concerning weights and measures, see GamVa-^ifra of Srid'hara, §4 — 8; and PRfxauDACA
sitamiChAturv^da on Brahmegupta's arithmetic, § lO-U.
• The copy of Ganoa'd'hara's commentary writes saura. But the exemplar of the text, con-
taining the passage, has seta.
B 2
y
CHAPTER 11.
SECTION I.
Invocation.'^
9- Salutation to G an'es'a, resplendent as a blue and spotless lotus; and
delighting in the tremulous motion of the dark serpent, which is perpetually-
twining within his throat.
Numeration.
10 — 11. Names of the places of figures have been assigned for practical
use by ancient writers,* increasing regularly' in decuple proportion : namely,
unit, ten, hundred, thousand, myriad, hundred thousands, million, ten
millions, hundred millions, thousand millions, ten thousand millions, hundred
thousand millions, billion, ten billions, hundred billions, thousand billions,
ten thousand billions, hundred thousand billions.*
' A reason of this second introductory stanza is, that the foregoing definitions of terms are not
properly a part of the treatise itself; nonesuch having been premised by Arya-biiatt'a and other
ancient authors to their treatises of arithmetic. Gan. and Mono.
^ According to the Hindus, numeration is of divine origin ; ' the invention cf nine figures (anca),
with the device of places to make them suffice for all numbers, being ascribed to the beneficent
Creator of the universe,' in Bhascara's Vdsand and its gloss; and in Crishna's commentary on
the Vija-garika. Here nine figures are specified ; the place, when none belongs to it, being shown
by a blank (sunya) ; which, to obviate mistake, is denoted by a dot or small circle.
' From the right, where the first and lowest number is placed, towards the left hand. Gas. &c.
♦ Sans, ka, daia, sata, sahasra, ayuta, lacsha, prayuta, coti, arbuda, abja or padma, c'/iarva,
nic'harva, mahdpadma, sancu,jalad'hi or samudra, antya, mad'hya, par&rd'ha.
A passage of the Veda, which is cited by Su'rya-dasa, contains the places of figures. 'Be
these the milch kine before me, one, ten, a hundred, a thousand, ten thousand, a hundred thousand,
a million Be these milch kine my guides in this world.'
Ga'n'esa observes, that numeration has been carried to a greater number of places by Srid'iiara
and others ; but adds, that the names are omitted on account of the numerous contradictions and
the little utility of tljose designations. The text of the Gaiiita-s/ira or abridgment of Srid'hara
does not correspond with this reference : for it exhibits the same eighteen places, and no more.
Gari-sdr. § 2—3.)
( 5 )
SECTION II.
Eight Operations' of Arithmetic.
12. Rule of addition and subtraction :* half a stanza.
ITie sum of the figures according to their places is to be taken in the
direct or inverse order :' or [in the case of subtraction] their difference.
13. Example. Dear intelligent Lila'vati,* if thou be skilled in addition
and subtraction, tell me the sum of two, five, thirty-two, a hundred and
ninety-three, eighteen, ten, and a hundred, added together; and the re-
mainder, when their sum is subtracted from ten thousand.
Statement, 2, 5, 32, 193, 18, 10, 100.
[Answer.] Result of the addition, 360.
Statement for subtraction, 10000, 360.
[Answer.] Result of the subtraction, 9640. '
14 — 15. Rule of multiplication:* two and a half stanzas.
Multiply the lasf figure of the multiplicand by the multiplicator, and
' ParJcamniiA/aca, eight operations, or modes of process : logistics or algorism.
* Sancalana, sancalita, misrana, yuti, yoga, &c. summation, addition. Vyavacalana, ryacacalita,
sod'hana, patana, &c. subtraction. Antara, difference, remainder.
' From the first on the right, towards the left; or from the last on the left, towards the right.
Gang.
• * Seemingly the name of a female to whom instruction is addressed. But the term is interpreted
in some of the commentaries, consistently with its etymology, " Charming." — See ^ 1. and 'ilJ.
* Mode of working addition as shown in the Manoranjana :
Sum of the units, 2, 5, 2, 3, 8, 0, 0, 20
Sura of the tens, 3,9,1,1,0, 14
Sum of the hundreds, 1,0,0,1, 2
Sum of the sums 360
* Gtinuna,abhydsa ; also hanuna and any terra implying a tendency to destroy. It is denominated
fratyutpanna by Brahmecvpta, § 3 ; and by Srid'haka, § 15 — 17-
Guhya multiplicand. Guiiaca multiplicator. Ghdia product.
* The digit standing last towards the left. The work may begin either from the first or the last
digit, according to Srid'iiara. Gaiiila-t&ra, § 15.
\
6 LI'LAVATr. Chapter II.
next the penult, and then the rest, by the same repeated. Or let the mul-
tiplicand be repeated under the several parts of the multiplicator, and be
multiplied by those parts : and the products be added together. Or the
multiplier being divided by any number which is an aliquot part of it, let
the multiplicand be multiplied by that number alid then by the quotient, the
result is the product. These are two methods of subdivision by form. Or
multiply separately by the places of figures, and add the products together.
Or multiply by the multiplicator diminished or increased by a quantity
arbitrarily assumed ; adding, or subtracting, the product of the multiplicand
taken into the assumed quantity.'
16. Example. Beautiful and dear Lila'vati, whose eyes are like a
fawn's ! tell me what are the numbers resulting from one hundred
and thirty-five, taken into twelve? if thou be skilled in multiplication
by whole or by parts, whether by subdivision of form or separation of
' The author teaches six methods, according to the exposition of Su'eyada'sa, &c. ; but seven,
as interpreted by Ganga'd'hara : and those, combined with the four of ScANftASEirA and
Srid'hara, (one of which at the least is unnoticed by Bha'scara,) make eight distinct ways.
The mode of multiplication by parts ('c'Aa«(ia-praci{ra) is distinguished into r&pa-tibhaga and
sfkina-vibhAga, or subdivision of the form and severance of the digits : the first is again divided into
multiplication by integrant or by aliquot parts : the second in like manner furnishes two ways,
according as the digits of the multiplier or of the multiplicand are severed. These then are four
methods, deduced from two of Scandase'na and Srid'hara ; to which two others are added by
Bha'scara, consisting in the increase or decrease of the multiplier by an arbitrary quantity, and
taking the sum or difference of the products. To those six must be joined the Tatst'ha of the older
authors, and their CapAtasattd'hi ; if indeed this be not (conformably with Gang a'd'hara's opinion,)
intended by Biia'scara's first method. It is wrought by repeating or moving the multiplier over
(accordihg to GAtrcA'D'HARA, or under, as directed by the ManormijaiM,) every digit of the
multiplicand ; and, according to the explanation of Gan'e's'a, it proceeds obliquely, joining
products along compartments. The tatst'ha, so named because the multiplier is stationary, appears
from Gan'e's'a's gtess to be cross multiplication. ' After setting the multiplier under the multi-
plicand,' he directs to ' multiply unit by unit, and note the result underneath. Then, as in cross
multiplication,* multiply unit by ten, and ten by unit, add together, and set down the sum in a
line with the foregoing result. Next multiply unit by hundred, and hundred by unit, and ten
by ten ; add together, and set down the result as before: and so on, with the rest of the digits.
This being done, the line of results is the product of the multiplication.' The commentator
considers this method as ' diflicult, and not to be learnt by dull scholars without oral instruction.'
He adds, that ' other modes may be devised by the intelligent.' See Arithm. of Brahm. § 55,
Gan.-sh: § 15—17.
* Vajr&bhy6ia. See V'ya-ganita, § 77-
S£CT. II.
LOGISTICS.
digits.' Tell me, auspicious womau, what is the quotient of the product
divided by the same multiplier }
Statement, Multiplicand 135. Multiplicator 12.
Product (multiplying the digits of the multiplicand successively by the
multiplicator) 2620
Or, subdividing the multiplicator into parts, as 8 and 4 ; and severally
multiplying the multiplicand by them ; adding the products together :
the result is the same, ]g20.
Or, the multiplicator 12 being divided by three, the quotient is 4; by
which, and by 3, successively multiplying the multiplicand, the last
product is the same, 1620.
Or, taking the digits as parts, viz. 1 and 2 ; the multiplicand being multi-
plied by them severally, and the products added together, according to
the places of figures, the result is the same, 1620.
Or, the multiplicand being multiplied by the multiplicator less two, viz.
10, and added to twice the multiplicand, the result is the same, 1620.
Or, the multiplicand being multiplied by the multiplicator increased by
ejght, viz. ao, and eight times the multiplier being subti:acted, the
result is the same, 1620,
' The following scheme of the process of multiplication is exhibited
in Gan'e's'a's commentary.
Or the process may be thus ordered, according to Ganga'd'hara,
12 12 12 Or, in this manner, 135 135
13 5 12
12 60
36
1620
Or in the subjoined modes taken from Chaturveda, &c.
135 1 135 135 8 1080
135 2 270 135 4 540
1620
1620
270
135
1620
1 / S/ 5
1 S 2
135 20 2700
135 8 1080
1620
%
« LI'LAVATl'. Chapter II.
17. Rule of division.' One stanza.
That number, by which the divisor being multiplied balances the last
digit of the dividend [and so on'], is the quotient in division : or, if practi-
cable, first abridge' both the divisor and dividend by an equal number, and
proceed to division.
[Example.] Statement of the number produced by multiplication in the
foregoing example, and of its multiplicator for a divisor: Dividend 1620.
[Divisor 12.]
Quotient 135 ; the same with the original multiplicand.*
Or both the dividend and the divisor, being reduced to least terms by the
common measure three, are 540 and 4 ; or l)y the con)mon measure four,
they become 405 and 3. Dividing by the respective reduced divisors, the
quotient is the same, 1 35.
18 — 19- Rule for the square' of a quantity: two stanzas.
The multiplication of two like numbers together is the square. Tlie
squareof the last'digit is to be placed over it; and the rest of the digits, doubled
and multiplied by that last, to be placed above them respectively; then repeat-
ing the number, except the last digit, again [perform the like operation]. Or
twice the product of two parts, added to the sum of the squares of the parts,
is the square [of the whole number].^ Or the product of the sum and
' Bh6ga-hdra, hMjana, hararia, ch'hedana : division. BMjya, dividend. Bh&jaca, fiara, divisor.
LabtThi, quotient.
* Repeating the divisor for every digit, like the multiplier in multiplication. Gang.
' Apaxartiia, abridging. See note on § 249.
* The process of long division is exhibited in the Manoranjana thus: The highest places of the
proposed dividend, l6, being divided by 12, the quotient is 1 ; and 4 over. Then 42 becomes the
highest remaining number, which divided by 12 gives the quotient 3, to be placed in a line with
the preceding quotient (1): thus 13. Remains 60, which, divided by 12, gives 5: and this being
carried to the same line as before, the entire quotient is exhibited : viz. 135. Man6r.
' Varga, crtti, a square number.
* The process may begin with the first digit: as intimated by the author, § 24.
' Let the portions, or quantities comprising the first and last figures, be represented by the first
letters of the alphabet, says the commentator on the Vhand: Then, proceeding by the rule of
multiplication, there results av\, a.d g\, a.igl, &v\ ; and, adding together like terms, av\,
a. &g2, (1 V ]. Rang.
Sect. II. LOGISTICS. 9
difference of the number and an assumed quantity, added to the square
of the assumed quantity, is the square.'
20. Example. Tell me, dear woman, the squares of nine, of fourteen,
of three hundred less three, and of ten thousand and five, if thou know the
method of computing the square.
Statement, 9, 14, 297, 10005.
[Answer.] Proceeding as directed, the squares are found: 81, 196,
88209, 100,100,025.
Or, put 4 and 5, parts of nine. Their product doubled 40, added to the
sum of their squares 41, makes 81.
So, taking 10 and 4, parts of fourteen. Their product 40, being doubled,
is 80; which, added to 116, the sum of the squares 100 and 16, makes the
entire square, 196.
Or, putting 6 and 8. Their product 48, doubled, is 96 ; which, added to
the sum of the squares 36 and 64, viz. 100, makes the same, li)6.
Again, 297, diminished by three, is 294 ; and, in another place, increased by
the same, is SOO. The product of these is 88200; to which adding the
square of three 9, the sum is as before the square, 88209.
21. Rule for the square-root : * one stanza.
Having deducted from the last of the odd digits' the square number,
The proposed quantity may be divided into three parts instead of two; and the products of the
first and second, first and third, and second and third, being added together and doubled, and
added to the turn of the squares of the parts, the total is the square sought. Gan.
' Another method is hinted in the author's note on this passage ; consisting in adding together
the product of the proposed quantity by any assumed one, and its product by the proposed lesstha
assumed one. Rang.
* Varga-mula root of the square : Mula, pada, and other synonyraa of root.
' Every uneven place is to be marked by a vertical line, and the intermediate even digits by a
horizontal one. But, if the last place be even, it is joined with the contiguous odd digit. Ex.
882oy.
From the last uneven place 8, deduct the square 4, remains 4 8 20 9. Double the root 2, and
divide by that (4) the subsequent even digit 48 : quotient nine [a higher one cannot be taken for
the root of the foregoing digit would become greater than 2 :] the remainder is 12209. From
the uneven place [with the residue] 12 2, subtract the square of the quotient 9, viz. 81, the remainder
i* 4 1 9- The double of the quotient 18 is to be placed in a line with the former double uuniber
c
VO LI'LAVATI'. Chapter II.
doul)]e its root ; aiul by that dividing the subsequent even digit, and sub-
tracting the square of the quotient from the next uneven place, note in a
hne [with the preceding double number] the double of the quotient. Divide
by tiie [number as noted in a] line the next even place, and deduct the
square of the quotient from the following uneven one, and note the double
of the quotient in the line. Repeat the process [until the digits be ex-
hausted.] Half the [number noted in the] line is the root.
22. Example. Tell me, dear woman, the root of four, and of nine, and
those of the squares before found, if thy knowledge extend to this calculation.
Statement, 4, 9, 81, 196, 88209, 100100025.
Answer. The roots are 2, 3, 9, 14, 297, 10005.
23 — 25. Rule for the cube' : three stanzas.
The continued multiplication of three like quantities is a cube. The cube
of the last [digit] is to be set down; and next the square of the last multi-
plied by three times the first ; and then the square of the first taken into the
last and tripled; and lastly the cube of the first: all these, added together
according to their places, make the cube. The proposed quantity [consist-
ing of more than two digits] is distributed into two portions, one of which is
then taken for the last [and the other for the first] ; and in like manner re-
peatedly [if there be occasion.*] Or the same process may be begun from
the first place of figures, either for finding the cube, or the square. Or three
times the proposed number, multiplied by its two parts, added to the sum
of the cubes of those parts, give the cube. Or the square root of the pro-,
posed number being cubed, that, multiplied by itself, is the cube of the pro-
posed square.'
4; thus, 58. By this divic^ the even place 410; the quotient is 7, and remainder 4y; to which
uneven digit the square of the quotient 49 answers without residue. The double of the quotient
14 is put in a line with the preceding double number 58, making 594. The half of which is the
root sought, 297. Mono, and Gang.
' G'hana, a cube. {lit. solid.)
* The subdivision is continued until it comes to single digits.
Gan'es'a confines it to the places of figures (st'h&iia-vibhdga,) not allowing the portioning of the
number (rupa-vibh6ga;) because the addition is to be made according to the places. ■ -'i
' This carries. an allusion to the raising of quantities to higher powers than the cube. Ok'sHa
Sect. II.
LOGISTICS.
11
26. Example. Tell me, dear woman, the cube of nine, and the cube of
the cube of three, and the cube of the cube of five, and the cube-roots of
these cubes, if thy knowledge be great in computation .of cubes.
Statem.ent, 9, 27, 125.
Answer: The cubes in the same order, are 729, 19683, 1953125.'
The proposed number being nin^ and its parts 4 and 5. Then 9 multi-
plied by them and by three is 540; which, added to the sum of the cubes
64 and 125, viz. 189, makes the cube of nine 729-
The entire number being 27, its parts are 20 and 7: by which, the nuin-
ber ^eing successively multiplied, and then tripled, is 1 1340; and this, added
to the sum of the cubes of the parts 8343, makes the cube 19683.
The proposed number being a square, as 4. Its root 2 cubed is 8. This,
taken into itself, gives 64 the cube of four. So nine being proposed, its
square root 3, cubed, is 27 ; the square of which 729 is the cube of 9. In
short the square of the cube is the same with the cube of the square.
\,
•peciSes some of them. The product of four like numbers multiplied together is the square of a
square, varga-varga. Continued multiplication up to six is the cube of a square, or square of a
cube, varga-g'/iana or g'hana-varga. Continued to eight, it is the square of a square's square,
targa-varga-varga. Continued to nine, it is the cube of a cube, g'hana-g'hana. Intermediately are,
the fifth power, varga-g'hana-gh&ta ; and the seventh, varga-varga-g'/tana-ghdta.
' The number proposed being 125, distributed into two parts 12 and 5; and the first of these
again into two portions, 1 and 2 :
Then 1, cubed, is 1
1, square of I, tripled and multiplied by 2, 6
4, square of 2, tripled and multiplied by 1, 12
2, cubed, S
1728
Now 12, cubed as above, is 1728
144, square of 12, tripled and multiplied by 5 2l60
25, square of 5, tripled and multiplied by 12, 900
5, cubed, 125
1953125
Mono.
C 2
Ifi LI'LAVATI'. Chapter II.
27 — 28. Rule for the cube-root' : two stanzas.
The first [digit] is a cube's place; and the two next uncubic; and again,
the rest in like manner. From the last cubic place take the [nearest] cube,
and set down its root apart. By thrice the square of that root divide the
next [or uncubic] place of figures, and note the quotient in a line [with the
quantity before found.] Deduct its square taken into thrice the last [term,]
from the next [digit ;] and its cube from the succeeding one. Thus the line
[in which the result is reserved] is the root of the cube. The operation is
repeated [as necessary.]*
Example. Statement of the foregoing cubes for extraction of the root:
729, 19683, 1953125.'
Answer. The cube-roots respectively are 9, 27, 125.
' G'hana-miila; root of the cube.
* The same rule is taught by Brahmegupta, § 7, and Sri'd'hara, § 29 — 31.
' The mode of conducting the work is shown in the Manoranjana, viz. 1953125. Here the last
1 — I
cubic digit is 1. Subtracting 1 the cube of the number 1, the remainder is 953125 ; and the
root obtained is 1, which is to be set down in two places. Dividing the next digit by three times
the square of that, the quotient taken is 2 [for 3 would soon appear to be too great ;] and the re-
sidue is 353125 ; and the quotient 2, put in a line with 1, makes 12. Subtract the square of this
2, tripled and multiplied by the last term, viz. 12, from the next digit, the remainder is 233125;
— I
and the cube of the quotient 2, viz. 8, being taken from the succeeding digit, the residue is 225 125.
Again, the reserved root 12, being squared and tripled, gives 432. The next place of figures,
divided by this, yields the quotient 5 and remainder Q\Z5; and the quotient is set down in the
line, which becomes 125. The square of that 5, viz. 25, multiplied by the last term 12, is 300,
and tripled 900 ; which subtract from the next place, and the residue is 125. Take the cube of
the quotient 5, viz. 125, from the succeeding digit, and the remainder is 0. Thus the root is
found 125.
I
( 13 )
4 '
SECTION III.
FRACTIONS.'
FOUR RULES FOR THE ASSIMILATION OR REDUCTION OF FRACTIONS TO A
COMMON DENOMINATOR.*
Simple Reduction of Fractions.*
29- Rule. The numerator and denominator* being multiplied recipro-
cally by the denominators of the two quantities,' they are thus reduced to
the same denomination. Or both numerator and denominator may be mul-
tiplied by the intelligent calculator into the reciprocal denominators abridged
by a common measure.
30. Example. Tell me the fractions reduced to a common denominator
' Bhinna a fraction ; lit. a divided quantity, or one obtained by division. — Gan. An incom-
plete quantity or non-integer (apurna). — Gang. A proper or improper fraction, including a
quantity, to which a part, as a moiety, a quarter, &c. is added ; or from which such a part is
deducted. — Gan. ,
* Bhuga-j&ti-chatushiaya, J6t'i-chatushtaya, or four modes of assimilation or process for reducing, to
a common denomination, fractions having dissimilar denominators : preliminary to addition and
subtraction, and other arithmetical operations upon fractions. Brahmegupta's commentator
Chaturve'da carries to six the number of rules termed _/<{<«, assimilation, or reduction to uni-
formity; and Srio'hara has no less than eight; including rules answering to Bha'scara's for
the arithmetic of fractions (Lit. \ 36 — 43J, and for the solution of certain problems (Lil.
§ 52—54, and § 94— 95.J See Brahmegupta's Arithmetic, § 1, note, (and § 2—5. § 8— p.) and
Gaii. s&r. § 32—57.
* Bhiiga-jdti or Ansa-savarna, assimilation of fractions ; or rendering fractions homogeneous :
reduction of them to uniformity.
* BMga, ansa, vibMga, lava, &cc. a part or fraction : the numerator of a fraction.
Hara, Mra, ch'hida, &c. the divisor ; the denominator of a fraction. That, which is to be di-
vided, is the part (ansa) ; and that, by which it is to be divided, is (hara) the divisor. Gan.
and SuR.
' EAU a quantity, § 36. It here intends one consisting of two terms; a part and a divisor, or
numerator and denominator. Gamb..
14 LIXAVATI'. Chapter II.
which answer to three and a fifth, and one-third, proposed for addition ; and
those whicli correspond to a sixty-third and a fourteenth offered for sub-
traction.
Statement: if i-*
Answer. Reduced to a common denominator ff -^ -^. Sum -ff-.
Statement of tlie 2d example : -jV i^-
Answer. The denominators being abridged, or reduced to least terms, by
the common measure seven, the fractions become -^ -^.
Numerator and denominator, multiplied by the abridged denominators,
give respectively -j-a-« a°d -j-|-y.
Subtraction being made, the difference is ^-f^.
Reduction of subdivided Fractions.
SI. Rule: half a stanza. ^
The numerators being multiplied by the numerators, and the denomi-
nators by the denominators, the result is a reduction to homogeneous form
in subdivision of fractions.
32. Example. The quarter of a sixteenth of the fifth of three-quarters
of two-thirds of a moiety of a dramma was given to a beggar by a person,
from whom he asked alms : tell me how many cowry shells the miser gave,
• Among astronomers and other arithmeticians, oral instruction has taught to place the nume-
rator above and denominator beneath. Gan.
No line is interposed in the original : but in the version it is introduced to conform to the prac-
tice of European arithmetic. Biia'scara subsequently directs (§ 36) an integer to be written as
a fraction by placing under it unity for its denominator. The same is done by him in this place
in the text. It corresponds'^with the directions of Srid'hara and of Brahmegupta's commen-
tator. Gan. s6r. § 32 ; Brahm. § 5.
* Prabh6ga^&ti assimilation of sub-fraetions, or making, uniform the fraction of a fraction: it
is a sort of division of fractions, G\H,
Trabhiga a divided fraction, or fraction of a fraction ; as a part of a moiety, and so forth.
Gang.
Chaturveda terms this operation Tratt/utpanna-juti ; assimilation consisting in multiplication,
or reduction to bomogeneousness by tnultiplication. Brahm. § 8.
J>
Sect. III. FRACTIONS. 15
if thou be conversant, in arithmetic, with the reduction termed subdivision
of fractions.
Statement • i x 2. i x _i_ i
Reduced to homogeneousness y^^, or in least terms ^-jVo-
Answer. A single cowry sbell was given.'
Reduction of Quantities increased or decreased by a Fraction.^
35. Rule : A stanza and a half.
The integer being multiplied by the denominator, the numerator is made
positive or negative,' provided parts of an unit be added or be subtractive.
But, if indeed the quantity be increased or diminished by a part of itself,
then, in the addition and subtraction of fractions, multiply the deno-
minator by the denominator standing underneath,* and the numerator by
the same augmented or lessened by its own numerator.
' For a cowry shell is in the tale of money the 1 280th part of a dramma, § 2.
* Bhiganuband'ha-jati ; assimilation of fractional increase; reduction to uniformity of an in-
crease by a fraction, or the addition of a part: from anuband^ha junction — Gan'., union — Stfa.,
addition — Gang.
Bhig6pax6ha-j/iti; assimilation of fractional decrease, reduction to uniformity of a decrease by
a fraction, or the subtraction of a part : derived from apavdha deduction, lessening, or subtrac-
tion.
These, as remarked by Ganb's'a, are sorts of addition and subtraction.
The fractions may be parts of an integer, or proportionate parts of the proposed quantity itself.
Hence two sorts of each, named by the commentators (Gang, and Sua.) Ripa-bAdgdnuband'ha,
addition of the fraction of an unit; Rupa-bMg/tpavAha, subtraction of the fraction of an unit;
R&si'bhiganuband'ka, addition of a fraction of the quantity; Rdii-bltagdpaidha, subtraction of a
fraction of the quantity.
' And added or subtracted accordingly. See explanation of positive and negative quantity
(d'haaa and rlna) in Vija-gamita, § 3.
♦ Indian arithmeticians write fractions under the quantities to which they are additive, or from
which they are subtractive. Accordingly, ' the numerators and denominators are put in their
order,' one under the other. Then multiply the denominator which stands above, by that which
stands below ; and the upper numerator, by a multiplier consisting of the same denominator with
its own numerator added or deducted, ttepeat the operatiom till the up and down line cOnthin
but two quantities.' — Sua.
It must have originally contained three terms or numbers, at the least, in examples of the
first rule; and four, in those of the last. — Gang.
16 LI'LA'VATI'. Chapteb II.
34. Example. Say, how much two and a quarter, and three less a
quarter, are, when reduced to uniformity, if thou be acquainted with frac-
tional increase and decrease.
Statement: 2 3
Answer : Reduced to homogeneousness, they become -J- and V .
35. Example. How much is a quarter added to its third part, with a
quarter of the sum ? and how much are two-thirds, lessened by one-eighth
of them, and then diminished by three-sevenths of the residue ? Tell me,
likewise, how much is half less its eighth part, added to nine-sevenths of
the residue, if thou be skilled, dear woman, in fractional increase and de-
crease ?
Statement: i* -I i
Answer : Reduced to uniformity, the results are i i -f.
The Eight Rules of Arithmetic applied to Fractions.*
56. Rule for addition and subtraction of fractions :* half a stanza.
The sum or [in the case of subtraction] the difference of fractions having
* Multiply the upper denominator 4, by the one beneath, 3 ; the product is 12. Then, by the
same denominator 3 added to its numerator 1, making 4, multiply the upper numerator; the
product is 4. Again multiply the denominator as above found by the lower denominator 2, the
product is 24 ; and by the same added to its numerator, making 3, multiply the numerator before
found, viz. 4, the product is 12. The result, therefore, is ^; which, abridged by the common
divisor six, gives ^ or a moiety.-.— Ma«d,
* Bkinna'paricarmdshtaca ; the eight modes of process, as applicable to fractions : the preceding
section being relative to those arithmetical processes as applicable to whole terras (abhinna'fari-
earmhhtacaj.
* Bhinna-sancalUa, addition of fractions. Bhinna-vt/avacaUta, subtraction of fractions.
Sect. III.
FRACTIONS.
17
a common denominator, is [taken]. Unity' is put denominator of a quan-
tity' which has no divisor.'
ij. Example. Tell me, dear woman, quickly, how much a fifth, a
quarter, a third, a half, and a sixth, make, when added together. Say
instantly what is the residue of three, subtracting those fractions ?
Statement .- -i x x x x.
6 4 3 2
Answer : Added together the sum is |-f .
[Statement A i J. ii^.]
Subtracting those fractions from three, the remainder is -f-x.
38. Rule for multiplication of fractions :* half a stanza.
The product of the numerators, divided by the product of denominators,
[gives a quotient, Avhich] is the result of multiplication of fractions.
39- Example. What is the product of two and a seventh, multiplied by
two and a third? and of a moiety multiplied by a third.'' tell, if thou be
skilled in the method of multiplication of fractions.
Statement : 2 . 2 (or reduced i . y ) \ . \.
\_ X
a 7
Answer : the products are \ and \.
40. Rule for division of fractions :' half a stanza.
After reversing the numerator and denominator of the divisor, the re-
maining process for division of fractions is that of multiplication.
41. Example. Tell me the result of dividing five by two and a third;
' JRi/pa, the species or form ; any thing having bounds. — Gang. Discrete quantity. In the
singular, the arithmetical unit ; in the plural, integer number. See Vija-gariita, §4.
* Rdsi, a congeries; a heap of things, of which one is the scale of numeration ; a quantity or
number. See Vija-gan. ib.
* That is, it is put denominator of an integer.
* Bhinm-gunana, multiplication of fractions.
' Bhinnorblidga-hara ; division of fractions.
18 LIXATATI. Chapter II.
and a sixth by a third ; if thy understanding, sharpened into confidence,
be competent to the division of fractions. '
Statement: 2{i)i i i-
i
Answer : Proceeding as directed, the quotients are y and -J-.
42. Rule for involution and evolution of fractions :* half a stanza.
If the square be sought, find both squares ; if the cube be required, both
cubes : or, to discover the root [of cube or square,] extract the roots of
both [numerator and denominator].
43. Example. Tell me quickly what is the square of three and a half;
and the square root of the square ; and the cube of the same ; and the cube
root of that cube : if thou be conversant with fractional squares and roots ?
Statement : 3 or reduced -J-.
X
a
Answer. Its square is V j of which the square root is ^. The cube of
it is »-|' ; of which again the cube root is i.
• Gan'esa omits the latter half of the stanza. Ganga'd'hara gives it entire.
* Bhinnorvarga, square of a fraction ; Bhinna-g'hana, cube of a fraction, &c.
(19 )
SECTION IV.
CIPHERS
44 — 45. Rule for arithmetical process relative to cipher : two couplets.
In addition, cipher makes the sum equal to the additive.* In involution
and [evolution]' the result is cipher. A definite quantity/ divided by cipher,
is the submultiple of nought.' The product of cipher is nought : but it
must be retained as a multiple of cipher,* if any further operation impend.
Cipher having become a multiplier, should nought afterwards become a
divisor, the definite quantity must be understood to be unchanged. So
likewise any quantity, to which cipher is added, or from which it is sub-
tracted, [is unaltered.]
46. Example. Tell me how much is cipher added to five ? and the
square of cipher? and its square root ? its cube? and cube-root? and five
multiplied by cipher? and how much is ten, subtracting cipher? and what
• bunya, c'ha, and other synonyraa of vacuum or etherial space : nought or cipher; a blank
or the privation of specific quantity. — Crishn. on V'tja-gaiiita.
The arithmetic of cipher is briefly treated by Brahmegupta in his chapter on Algebra,
h 19 — 24. See Cii. on Arithm. of Braiim. § 13, note.
CshSpa; that which is cast or thrown in ('wAipj^afO • additive. Gang.
* Involution, &c. That is, square and square-root ; cube and cube-root. Gang.
♦ R/isi. See § 36.
' C'ha-hara, a fraction with cipher for its denominator. According to the remark of Gan'e's'a,
aa indefinite, unlimited, or infinite quantity : since it cannot be determined how great it is. Un-
altered by addition or subtraction of finite quantities: since, in the preliminary operation of re-
ducing both fractional e.\pressions to a common denominator, preparatory to taking their sum or
difference, both numerator and denominator of the finite quantity vanish. RanganaYha affirms,
that it is infinite, because the smaller the divisor is, the greater is the quotient : now cipher, being
in the utmost degree small, gives a quotient infinitely great. See Vya-gadita, § 14.
* Chaguiia, a quantity which has cipher for its multiplier. Cipher is set down by the side of
the multiplicand, to denote it. Gan.
80 LIXAVATI'. Chapter II.
number is it, which multiplied by cipher, and added to half itself, and mul-
tiplied by three, and divided by cipher, amounts to the given number sixty-
three ?
Statement : 0. Cipher added to five makes 5. Square of cipher, 0.
Square-root, 0. Cube of cipher, 0. Cube-root, 0.
Statement : 5. This, multiplied by cipher makes 0.
Statement: 10. This, divided by cipher, gives V*-
Statement; An unknown quantity; its multiplier, 0; additive, i; mul-
tiplicator, 3; divisor, 0; given number, 63; assumption, 1. Then, either
by inversion or position, as subsequently explained (§ 47 and 50), the num-
ber is found, 14. This mode of computation is of frequent use in astrono-
mical calculation.
CHAPTER HI.
MISCELLANEOUS RULES:
SECTION I.
INVERSION.
47 — 48. Rule of inversion :* two stanzas.
To investigate a quantity, one being given,' make the divisor a multi-
plicator : and the multipher, a divisor ; the square, a root ; and the root, a
square ;* turn the negative into positive ; and the positive into negative.
If a quantity was to be increased or diminished by its own proportionate
part, let the [lower'] denominator, being increased or diminished by its nu-
merator, become the [corrected'] denominator, and the numerator remain
unchanged ; and then proceed with the other operations of inversion, as be-
fore directed.
49. Example. Pretty girl with tremulous eyes, if thou know the cor-
rect method of inversion, tell me, what is the number, which multiplied by
' Pracirna miscellaneous. The rules, contained in the five first sections of this chapter, have
none answering to them in the Arithmetic of Brahmegupta and Sri'd'hara. Some of the ex-
amples, however, serving to illustrate the reduction of fractions (as § 51 — 54.) do correspond.
Compare § 54 with Gari. sdr. § 52.
* Viloma-vid'hi, Viluma-criyd, Vyasta-vid'hi, inversion.
' Drisya; the quantity or number, which is visible ; the one known by the enunciation of the
problem : the given quantity.
♦ And the cube, a cube-root ; and the cube-root, a cube. Gan'.
' Ganga'd'hara.
32 LI'LA'VATI'. Chapter III.
three, and added to three quarters of the quotient, and divided by seven,
and reduced by subtraction of a third part of the quotient, and then multi-
pUed into itself, and having fifty-two subtracted from the product, and the
square root of the remainder extracted, and eight added, and the sum divided
by ten, yields two ? '
Statement : Multiplier 3. Additive \. Divisor 7. Decrease i- Square
— . Subtractive 52. Square-root — . Additive 8. Divisor 10. Given
number 2.
Answer. Proceeding as directed, the result is 28 ; the number sought.
• All the operations are inverted. The known number 2, multiplied by the divisor 10 con-
verted into a multiplicator, makes 20; from which the additive 8, being subtracted, leaves 12;
the square whereof (extraction of the root being directed) is 144; and adding the subtractive 52,
becomes 196: the root of this (squaring was directed) is 14 : added to its half, 7, it amounts to
21 ; and multiplied by 7, is 147. This again divided by 7 and multiplied by 3, makes 63 ; which,
subtracted from 147, leaves 84 ; and this, divided by 3, gives 28. Maao.
( 23 ) BI-
SECTION II.
SUPPOSITION.
50. Rule of supposition :• one stanza.
Or any number, assumed at pleasure, is treated as specified in the parti-
cular question ; being multiplied and divided, raised or diminished by frac-
tions : then the given quantity, being multiplied by the assumed number
and divided by that [which has been found,] yields the number sought.
This is called the process of supposition.*
51. Example.' What is that number, which multiplied by five, and
having the third part of the product subtracted, and the remainder divided
by ten, and one-third, a half and a quarter of the original quantity added,
gives two less than seventy ?
Statement : Mult. 5. Subtractive ^ of itself Div. 10. Additive i -i i
of the quantity. Given 68.
Putting 3; this, multiplied by 5, is 15 ; less its third part, is 10; divided
by ten, yields 1. Added to the third, half and quarter of the assumed
number three, viz. ^^j^, the sum is V- ^y this divide the given number
68 taken into the assumed one 3 ; the quotient is 48.
The answer is the same with any other assumed number, as one, &c.
• Thus, by whatever number the quantity is multiplied or divided in any
example, or by whatever fraction of the quantity, it is increased or dimi-
nished; by the same should the like operations be performed on a number
■ Iskia-carman : operation with an assumed number. It is the rule of false position, suppo-
sition, and trial and error.
In this method, multiplication, division, and fractions only are employed. Gan.
' Reduction of a given number with affirmative fractions is the subject of this example; as re-
duction of a number given, with negative fractions, is that of the next. Sua.
In the rule of position or reduction appertaining to it, are comprehended reduction of given
quantity (with fractions affirmative or negative), reduction of fractions of residues, and reduction
of differences of fractions. Gako.
24 LI'LA'VATr. Chapter III.
arbitrarily assumed : and by that, which results, divide the given number
taken into the assumed one ; the quotient is the quantity sought.
52. Example of reduction of a given quantity.' Out of a heap of pure
lotus flowers, a third part, a fifth and a sixth, were offered respectively to
the gods Siva, Vishnu and the Sun; and a quarter was presented to Bha-
va'ni. The remaining six lotuses were given to the venerable preceptor.
Tell quickly the whole number of flowers.
Statement : -J- y i i ; known 6.
Putting one for the assumed number, and proceeding as above, the quan-
tity is found 120.
53. Example of reduction of residues :* A traveller, engaged in a pil-
grimage, gave half his money at Prayaga; two-ninths of the remainder at
Casi; a quarter of the residue in payment of taxes on the road; six-tenths
of what was left at Gaya ; there remained sixty-three nishcas ; with which
he returned home. Tell me the amount of his original stock of money, if
you have learned the method of reduction of fractions of residues.
Statement : i -| i ^ ; known 63.
Putting one for the assumed number; subtracting the numerator from its
denominator, multiplying denominators together, and in other respects
proceeding as directed, the remainder is found -^. By this dividing the
given number 63 taken into the assumed quantity, the original sum comes
out 540.
Or it may be found by the method of reduction of fractional decrease
[§33]. Statement: -i- -i« .^^ h* f]". Being reduced to homogeneous form,
the result is -^ : Avhence the sum is deduced 540.
Or this may also be found by the rule of inversion [§ 47.]
54. Example of reduction of differences.' Out of a swarm of bees, one-
" Drtiya-jiti ; assimilation of the visible; reduction of the given quantity with fractions affir-
mative or negative : here, with negative ; in the preceding example, with affirmative.
* Skha-j&ti, assimilation of residue; reduction of fractions of residues or successive fractional
remainders.
' Viilisha-Jdti, assimilation of difference ; reduction of fractional differences.
Sectiox II.
SUPPOSITION.
25
fifth part settled on a blossom of Cadamba ;' and one-third on a flower of
Silind'hri .-^ three times the difference of those numbers flew to the bloom of
a CuiaJaJ One bee, which remained, hovered and flew about in the air,
allured at the same moment by the pleasing fragrance of a jasmin and pan-
danus. Tell me, charming woman, the number of bees.*
Statement : x x ^ ; known quantity, 1 ; assumed, 30.
A fifth of the assumed number is 6; a third is 10; difi^erence 4 ; multi-
plied by three gives 12 ; and the remainder is 2. Then the product of the
known quantity by the assumed one, being divided by this remainder, shows
the number of bees 15.
Here also putting unit for the assumed quantity, the number of the swarm
is found 15.
So in other instances likewise.*
* Cadamba, Nauclea orientalis or N. Cadamba.
* Silind'hri, a plant resembling the Cachora. Crishx. on Vija-gari.
■*, Echites antidysenterica.
* See the same example in Vija-gaiiila, § 108.
' The Manoranjana introduces one more example, which is there placed after the second. It
is similar to one which occurs in Sri'd'hara's Ga'nita-sdra, § 30; and is here subjoined : — " The
third part of a necklace of pearls, broken in an amorous struggle, fell to the ground: its fifth
part rested on the couch ; the sixth part was saved by the wench ; and the tenth part was taken
up by her lover : six pearls remained strung. Say, of how many pearls the necklace was composed."
Statement : i i i -^ i Rem. 6. Answer 30.
( 2ff )
SECTION III.'
£5. Rule of concurrence : half a stanza.
The sum with the, difference added and subtracted, being halved, gives
the two quantities. This is termed concurrence.*
56. Example. Tell me the numbers, the sum of which is a hundred and
one ; and the difference, twenty-five ; if thou know the rule of concurrence,
dear child.
Statement: Sum 101; diff. 25. — Answer: the two numbers are 38 and
63.
67' Rule of dissimilar operation :J half a stanza.
The difference of the squares, divided by the difference of the radical
quantities,* gives their sum : whence the quantities are found in the mode
before directed.
58. Example. Tell me quickly, skilful calculator, what numbers are
they, of which the difference is eight, and the difference of squares four
hundred ?
Statement : Diff. of the quantities 8. Diff. of the squares 400.
Answer. The numbers are 2 1 and 29.
• The rules coraprised in this section are treated under the same ti ties (Sancramaria and Vishama-
carman) by Brahmegupta, in his chapter on Algebra, or, as by him termed, lecture on the
pulverizer, § 25. See Chaturveda on Arithm. of Brahm. § 66.
• Sancramana, concurrence or mutual penetration in the shape of sum and difference. — Gang.
Investigation of two quantities concurrentor grown together in form of sum and difference. — Gan.
Calculation of quantities latent within those exhibited. — Sua. The same term signifies transition
(or transposition). See Brahmegupta, Arithm. § 12.
• Vishama-carman : the finding of the quantities, when the difference of their squares is given,
and either the sum or the difference of the quantities. — Gan. A species of concurrence.— Gang.
See below LiUvati, § 135. Vija-gan. % 148.
• Or divided by their sum, gives their difference. — Gan.
( 27 )
SECTION IV.
Problem concerning Squares.*
A certain problem relative to squares is propounded in the next instance.
59 — 60 Rule: The square of an arbitrary number, multiplied by eight and
lessened by one, then halved and divided by the assumed number, is one
quantity: its square, halved and added to one, is the other. Or unity,
divided by double an assumed number and added to that number, is a first
quantity ; and unity is the other. These give pairs of quantities, the sum
and difference of whose squares, lessened by one, are squares.
Tell me, my friend, numbers, the sum and difference of whose squares,
less one, afford square roots : which dull smatterers in algebra labor to excru-
ciate, puzzling for it in the six-fold method of discovery there taught.*
To bring out an answer by the first rule, let the number put be i. Its
square, \, multiplied by eight, is 2 ; which, lessened by one, is 1. This halved
is i, and divided by the assumed number (i) gives -^ for the first quantity.
Its square halved is i; which, added to one, makes f. Thus the two
quantities are i and f .
So, putting one for the assumed number, the numbers obtained are ^, and
y. With the supposition of two, they are V ^"d W*
By the second method, let the assumed number be 1. Unity divided by
the double of it is -i, which, added to the assumed number, makes -f-. The
first quantity is thus found. The second is unity, 1. With the supposition
of two, the quantities are -J and 4-. Putting three, they are y and i.
6 1 . Another Rule :' The square of the square of an arbitrary number, and
• Varga-carman. Operation relative to squares. An indeterminate problem; admitting
innumerable solutions.
This question, found in some copies of the text, and interpreted by Ganga'd'hara and the
Manoranjana, is unnoticed by other commentators.
• To bring out answers in whole numbers : the two preceding solutions giving fractions.
E 3 Gan. and Si;k.
88 Ll'LA'VATI. Chaptkr III.
the cube of that number, respectively multiplied by eight, adding one to
the first product, are such quantities ;i equally in arithmetic and in algebra.
Put -J-. The square of the square of the assumed number is -Jj-; which,
multiplied by eight, makes ^. This, added to one, is |; and is the first
quantity. Again put -f-. Its cube is i; which, multiplied by eight, gives
the second quantity -l. Next, supposing one, the two quantities are 9 and 8.
Assuming two, they are 129 and 64. Putting three, they are 649 and 216.
And so on, without end, by means of various suppositions, in the several
foregoing methods.
" Algebraic solution, similar to arithmetical rules, appears obscure ; but is
not so, to the intelligent : nor is it sixfold, but manifold."
* The greater quantity is to be taken such, that the square of it may consist of three portions,
whereof one shall be unity; and the remaining two be squares; and twice the product of the
.roots of those squares constitute a square, the root of which will be the second quantity.
Rang.
( 29 )
SECTION V.
62—63. Rule for assimilation of the root's coefficient :* two stanzas.
The sum or difference of a quantity and of a multiple of its square-root
being given, the square of half the coefficient* is added to the given number;
and the square root of their sum [is extracted : that root,] with half the
coefficient added or subtracted, being squared, is the quantity sought by
the interrogator.' If the quantity have a fraction added, or subtracted,
divide the number given and the multiplicator of the root, by unity increased
or lessened by the numerator, and the required quantity may be then
discovered, proceeding with those quotients as above directed.
A quantity, increased or diminished by its square-root multiplied by some
number, is given. Then add the square of half the multiplier of the root
to the given number: and extract the square-root of the sum. Add half
the multiplier, if the difference were given ; or subtract it, if the sum were
so. The square of tlie result will be the quantity sought.
64. Example (the root subtracted, and the difference given). One
pair out of a flock of geese remained sporting in the water, and saw seven
times the half of the square-root of the flock proceeding to the shore tired
of the diversion. Tell me, dear girl, the number of the flock.
' Mula-jdti, mula-gunaca-j6ti or Ishta-mulinsa-j&ti, assimilation and reduction of the root's
coefficient with a fraction.
Guna, multiplicator ; 7na/a-o^««'a, root's multiplier; the coefficient of the root.
' The quantity sought consists of two portions ; one the square-root taken into its multiplicator;
the other the given number. The number givea too is the quantity required less the root taken
into its multiplicator : and the quairtity sought is the square of that root. Therefore the number
given is one that consists of two portions; viz. the square of the root less the root taken into its
multiplier. Now the root taken into its multiplier is equivalent to twice the product of the root
by half the multiplicator. By adding then the square of half the multiplicator to the given
number, a quantity results of which the root may be taken ; and this root is the root(of the quantity
sought) less half the multiplier. Therefore that added to half the multiplier is the root (of th»
quantity required) ; and its square, of course, is the number sought. Rang.
30 LI'LA'VATI'. Chapter III.
Statement: CoefF. i. Given 2. Half the coefficient is i. Its square
^ ; added to the given number, makes -f-^ ; the square root of which is -J.
Half the coefficient being added, the sum is V; or. reduced to least terms, 4.
This squared is 16 ; the number of the flock, as required.
65. Example (the root added and the sum given). Tell me what is
the number, which, added to nine times its square-root, amounts to twelve
hundred and forty ?
Statement: CoefF. g. Given 1240. Answer 96 1.
66. Example (the root and a fraction both subtracted). Of a flock of
geese, ten times the square-root of the number departed for the M&nasa
lake,* on the approach of a cloud : an eighth part went to a forest of
St'halapadminis :* three couples were seen engaged in sport, on the water
abounding with delicate fibres of the lotus. Tell, dear girl, the whole
number of the flock.
Statement: Coeff. 10. Fraction i. Given 6.
By the [second] rule (§ 63) ; unity, less the numerator of the fraction, is
i; and the coefiicient and given number, being both divided by that, become
%^ and y; and the half coefficient is %s. With these, proceeding by the
[first] rule (§ 62), the number of the flock is found 144.
67. Example.' The son of Prit'ha,* irritated in fight, shot a quiver
of arrows to slay CARisrA. With half his arrows, he parried those of his
antagonist; with four times the square-root of the quiver-full, he killed his
; '.•* Wild geese are observed to quit the plains of India, at the approach of the rainy season ; and
the lake called MAnasar&car (situated in the Un- or H&n-des) is covered with water-fowl, geese
especially, during that season. The Hindus suppose the whole tribe of geese to retire to the holy
lake at the approach of rain. The bird is sacred to Brahma.
* The plant intended is not ascertained. The context would seem to imply that it is arboreous :
as the term signifies forest.
* This example is likewise inserted in the Vija-ganila, § 133.
* AajuNA, sunmmed Part'ha : his matronymic from Puit'ha or Kont'hi.
Sect. V.
MISCELLANEOUS.
31
hbrses ; with six arrows, he slew Salya ;' with three he demohshed the
umbrella, standard and bow; and with one, he cut off the head of the
foe. How many were the arrows, Avhich Arjuna let fly ?
Statement : Fraction i. Coeff. 4. Given 10.
The given number and coefficient being divided (by unity less the fraction)
become 20 and 8 ; and proceeding by the rule (§ 63), the number of arrows
comes out 100.
68. Example.* The square-root of half the number of a swarm of bees
is gone to a shrub of jasmin ;' and so are eight-ninths of the whole swarm;
a female is buzzing to one remaining male that is humming within a lotus,
in which he is confined, having been allured to it by its fragrance at night*
Say, lovely woman, the number of bees.
Here eight-ninths of the quantity, and the root of its half, are negative
[and consequently subtractive] from the quantity : and the given number is
two of the specific things. The negative quantity and the number given,
being halved, bring out half the quantity sought.' Thus,
Statement : Fraction f . CoefF. "^ Given f.
A fraction of half the quantity is the same with half the fraction of the
quantity : the fraction is therefore set down [unaltered].
Here, proceeding as above directed, there comes out half the quantity, 36;
which, being doubled, is the number of bees in the swarm, 72.
69- Example. Find quickly, if thou have skill in arithmetic, the quantity,
' One of the Cauraxas, and charioteer of Cakna.
* Inserted also in the Vija-ganiia. § 132.
' Malati, Jasminum grandiflorum.
♦ The lotus being open at night and closed in the day, the bee might be caught in it. Gan.
' In such questions, it is necessary to observe whether the coefficient of the root be so of the
root of the whole number, or of that of its part. For that quantity is found, of whose root the
coefficient is used. But, in the present case, the root of half the quantity is proposed ; and
accordingly, the half of the quantity will be found by the rule. The number given, however, belongs
to the entire quantity. Therefoia^ taking half the given number, half the required number is
to be brought out by the process before directed.
Man6. and Sv'ri
52 LI'LA'VATI'. Chapter III.
which added to its third part and eighteen times its square root, amounts
to twelve hundred.
Statement: Fraction -|^. CoefF. 18. Given 1200.
Here, dividing the coefficient and given number by unity added to the
fraction [§ 63] and proceeding as before directed, the number is brought
out, 576.
( 33 )
SECTION VI.
RULE of PROPORTION.'
70. Rule of three terms.'
The first and last terms, which are the argument and requisition, must be
of like denomination ; the fruit, which is of a different species, stands
between them : and that, being multiplied by the demand and divided by
the first term, gives the fruit of the demand.' In the inverse method, the
operation is reversed.*
71. Example. If two and a half palas of saffron be obtained for three-
sevenths of a nishca ; say instantly, best of merchants, how much is got for
nine nishcas ?
Statement : -f 4 f • Answer : 52 palas and 2 carshas.
72. Example. If one hundred and four nishcas are got for sixty-three
palas of best camphor, consider and tell me, friend, what may be obtained
for twelve and a quarter palas ?
Statement: 63 104 V- Answer: 20 nishcas, 3 drammas, 8 panas, 3
cacinis, 1 1 cowryshells and ^th part.
73. Example. If a chart and one eighth of rice, may be procured for
two drammas, say quickly what may be had for seventy pa/ias ?
' The rule of proportion, direct and inverse, simple and compound, including barter, has been
similarly treated by Brahmegupta, Arithm. § 10 — 13; and by Srid'hara (adding, however,
as a distinct article, the sale of live animals and slaves, which Bha'scara places under the rule of
three invei-se). Gad. stir. § 58—90.
Trairdsica, calculation belonging to a set of three terms. — Gang. Rule of three.
The first term is pramiiia, the measure or argument ; the second is its fruit, phala, or produce of
the argument ; the third is ich'h6, the demand, requisition, desire or question. Gan.
* Ich'hd-phala, produce of the requisition, or fruit of the question : it is of the same denomination
or species with the second term.
♦ See S 74.
T
34 LI'LAVAT'I. Chapter III.
Statement (reducing drammas to panas) : 32 f 70.
Answer : 2 charts, 7 drdnas, 1 adhaca, 2 prast'has.
74. Rule of three inverse'
If the fruit diminish as the requisition increases, or augment as that
decreases, they, who are skilled in accounts, consider the rule of three terms
to be inverted.*
When there is diminution of fruit, if there be increase of requisition, and
increase of fruit if there be diminution of requisition, then the inverse rule
of three is [employed]. For instance,
75. When the value of living beings' is regulated by their age; and in
the case of gold, where the weight and touch* are compared; or when
heaps' are subdivided ; let the inverted rule of three terms be [used].
76. Example. If a female slave sixteen years of age, bring thirty-two
\jiishcas], what will one aged twenty cost? If an ox, which has been worked
a second year, sell for four nishcas, what will one, which has been worked
six years, cost ?
1st Qu.
Statement :
16 32 20.
Answer : 25-f- nishcas.
2d Qu.
Statement :
2 4 6.
Answer: 1^ nishca.
77. Example. If a gadymaca of gold of the touch of ten may be had
' Vyasta-trair&sica or Viloma-trtdrdsica, rule of three terms inverse.
* The method of performing the inverse rule has been already taught (§ 70). " In the inverse
method, the operation is reversed." That is, the fruit is to be multiplied by the argument and
divided by the demand. Su'r.
When fruit increases or decreases, as the demand is augmented 01 diminished, the direct rule
(crama-trair&sica) is used. Else the inverse. Gan.
' Slaves and cattle. The price of the older is less ; of the younger, greater. Gang, and Su'r.
* Colour on the touchstone. See Alligation, § 101.
' See Chap. 10. When heaps of grain, which had been meted with a small measure, are again
meted with a larger one, the number decreases ; and when those, which had been meted with a
large measure, are again meted with a smaller one, there is increase of number. Gang and Sue.
Skctiox VI. RULE OF PROPORTION. 35
for one nishca [of silver], what weight of gold of fifteen touch may be
bought for the same price ?
Statement: 10 1 15. Answer i.
78. Example. A heap of grain having been meted with a measure
containing seven ad'hacas, if a hundred such measures were found, what
would be the result with one containing five ad'hacas?
Statement: 7 100 5. Answer 140.
79- Rule of compound proportion.*
In the method of fi\-e, seven, nine or more ' terms, transpose the fruit and
divisors;' and the product of multiplication of the larger set of terms, being
divided by the product of the less set of terms,* the quotient is the produce
[sought].
• This, which is the compound rule of three, coraprises, according to the remark of Gau'e'sa,
two or more sets of three terms CtrairdsicaJ ; or two or more proportions fanupdtaj, as Su'ryada'sa
observes. "Thus the rule of five (pancha-r&sica) comprises two proportions; that of seven
Ctapta-rdsicaJ, three; that of nine (naca-riika), four; and that of eleven (ec&dasa-rdsica) , five."
* Meaning eleven. — Mono. Eleven or more. — Sua. It is a rule for finding a sixth term, five being
given; (or, from seven known terms, an eighth ; from nine, a tenth ; from eleven, a twelfth).
' Ganbs'a and the commentator of the VdsanA understand this last word (ch'hid divisor) at
relating to denominators effractions; and the transposing of them (if any there be) is indeed right:
accordingly the author gives, under this rule, an example of working with fractions (§ 81). But
the Manoranjana and Su'ryada'sa explain it otherwise ; and the latter cites an ancient commentary
entitled Gatiita-caumudi (also quoted by Rangan at'ii a) in support of his exposition. ' There are
two sets of terms; those which belong to the argument; and those which appertain to the requisition.
The fruit, in the first set, is called produce of the argument; that, in the second, is named divisor
of the set. They are to be transposed, or reciprocally brought from one set to the other. That
is, put the fruit in the second set; and place the divisor in the first. Would it not be enough to
say transpose the fruits of both sets ? The author of the Caumudi replies " the designation of
divisor serves to indicate, that, after transposition, the fruit of the second set, being included in the
product of the multiplication of the less set of terms, the product of the greater set is to be divided
by it." ' Some, however, interpret it as relative to fractions [" transpose denominators, if any
there be." — Gavg.] But that is wrong: for the word would be superfluous.'
♦ Ba/tu-rdsi (pacsha), set of many terms : the one which is most numerous. (That, to which the
fruit is brought, is the larger set. — Gang, Or, if there be fruit on both sides, that, in which the
fruit of the requisition is, — Gan.) Laghu-rdsi, set of fewer terms ; that, which is less numerous.
?3
36 Ll'LAVATI'. Chapter III-
80. Example. If the interest of a hundred for a month he five, say what
is the interest of sixteen for a year? Find likewise the time from the
principal and interest; and knowing the time and produce, tell the principal
sum.
1 12
Statement: 100 \6 'Answer: the interest is 9f.
5 1
To find the time ; Statement: 100 16 * Answer: months 12.
K 4 8
■^ i"
To find the principal ; Statement: 1 12 'Answer: principal 16.
100
81. Example. If the interest of a hundred for a month and one-third,
be five and one fifth, say what is the interest of sixty-two and a half foJ'
three months and one fifth ?
A l_6
3 i
Statement: 'f" >f* ♦Answer: interest 7|^.
V
„ . , , .. L ^1 Product of the larger set, 960 Quotient, 960 ^, 48
^Transpos»>gthefru.t,100l| of the less set, 100. ToO ""^ T.
1 1
* Transposing both fruits, ^ ^ and the denominator, ^g ^
5
Product of the larger set, 4800
of the less set, 400. Quotient, 12.
1 12 1 12
' Transposing both fruits, 100 and the denominator, 100
V 5 48 5
^ 5
Product of the larger set 4800
of the less set 300. Quotient, 16.
« Transposing the fruit, 4 V* and the denominators, * '36 Abridging by correspondent re-
100 Its
00 1|4 »J" »»
auction on both sides* 1 4, and by further reduction, 1 1 Answer V <»«" 7f
5 3 13
4 5 11
2 1 11
5 26 5 13
• The Man<!ron/«na teaches to abridge the work by reduction of terun on both sides by their common diTiJors.
Section VI.
RULE OF PROPORTION.
37
82. Example of the rule of seven: If eight, best, variegated, silk scarfs,
measuring three cubits in breadth and eight in length, cost a hundred
[nisficasl ; say quickly, merchant, if thou understand trade, what a like scarf,
three and a half cubits long and half a cubit wide, will cost.
Statement: 8 -|-
8 1
100
'Answer: Nishca 0, drammas 14, panas 9, cdcini 1,
cowry shells 6f .
83. Example of the rule of nine : If thirty benches, twelve fingers
thick, square of four wide, and fourteen cubits long, cost a hundred [nishcas];
tell me, my friend, what price will fourteen benches fetch, which are four
less in every dimension ?
Statement:
; 12
8
16
12
14
10
30
14
100
* Answer: Nishcas \6\.
84. Example of the rule of eleven : If the hire of carts to convey
the benches of the dimensions first specified, a distance of one league
(gavyuti,y be eight drammas; say what should be the cart-hire for bringing
the benches last mentioned, four less in every dimension, a distance of six
leagues r
• Transposing fruit and denominators, 3
2
• Transposing fruit, 1 2
16
14
30
8 7
2
8 1
100
8 abridi»ing by
12 correspondent
10 reduction on
14 both sides;
100
1 Product oflarger set, 700 Quotient, 14 9 1 6|
of less set, 768.
1
I
I
1
100
Product of larger set, 100 Quotient, l6|
of <e« set, 6 .
' Gary^ifi ; two cr6sas or \ia\( a yojana : if contains 4000 rfoHf/rt,? or fathoms; about 8000 yards;
and is about 3, 8 B. miles : the crosa being 1, 9 B. m. See As. Res. 5. Wo.
IS
8
16
12
Statement :
14
10
30
14
1
6
8
58 LI'LA'VATI. Chapter III.
'Answer : Drammas 8.
85. Rule of barter;* half a stanza. ^^^
So in barter likewise, the same process is [followed;] transposing both
prices, as well as the divisors.'
86. Example. If three hundred mangoes be had in this market for one
dramma, and thirty ripe pomegranates for a pana, say quickly, friend, how
many should be had in exchange for ten mangoes ?
Statement: 16 1 *Answer: 16 pomegranates.
300 30
10
* Transposing the fruit, 12 8 abridging by 1 1 and by further 1 I
\6 12 correspondent 2 1 reduction, 1 1
14 10 reduction on 1 1 11
30 14 both sides, 3 1 11
1 6 1 6 12
8 8 4
Product of larger set, 8 ^ . , „
,, ^ ' , Quotient, 8.
of less set, 1
• BMnda-prati-bkdndaca commodity for commodity ; computation of the exchange of goods
{XKUtu-vinimayO'ganita, — Gang.) : barter.
» Gakgad'hara, Su'ryada'sa and the Manoranjana so read this passage: hardns-cha maulye.
But Gan'e'sa and Ranganat'ha have the affirmative adverb sadA-hi, in place of the words " and
the divisors ;" har&ns-cha. At all events, the transposition of denominators takes place, as usual ;
and so does that of the lower term, as in the rule of five ; to which, as Su'ryada'sa remarks, this
is analogous. It comprises two proportions, thus stated by him from the example in the text.
" If for one paiia, thirty pomegranates may be had, how many for sixteen? Answer, 480.
Again, if for three hundred mangoes, four hundred and eighty pomegranates maybe had, how
many for ten ? Answer, l6. Here thirty is first multiplied by sixteen and then divided by one ;
and then multiplied by ten and divided by three hundred. For brevity, the prices are transposed,
and the result is the same." Su'r.
■♦ Transposing the prices, 1 \G and, transferring the fruit, 1 \6 Then product
300 30 300 30
10 10
of the larger set, 4800 Quotient, l6. Or, by correspondent reduction, 1 1 6 and further 1 l6
of the less set, 300. 10 1 11
10 1
Whence products i6 and quotient \Q.
1
I
( 39 )
CHAPTER IV.
INVESTIGATION OF MIXTURE.
SECTION I.
INTEREST.
87 — 88. Rule : a stanza and a half.'
The argument' multiphed by its time, and the fruit multiplied by the mixt
quantity's time, being severally set down, and divided by their sum and
multiplied by the mixt quantity, are the principal and interest [composing
the quantity]. Or the principal being found by the rule of supposition, that,
taken from the mixt quantity, leaves the amount of interest.
89. Example. If the principal sum, with interest at the rate of five on
the hundred by the month, amount in a year to one thousand, tell the
principal and interest respectively.
1 12
Statement: 100 1000. ^Answer: Principal, 625; Interest, 375.
5
Or, by the rule of position, put one ; and proceeding according to that
rule (§ 50), the interest of unity is f; which, added to one, makes f. The
' it/wrn-rj/araAiira, investigation of mixture, ascertainment of composition, as principal and interest
joinei), and so forth. — Gajj. It is chiefly grounded on the rule of proportion. — Ibid. The rules in
this chapter bear reference to the examples which follow them. Generally they are quasstiones
otiosae ; problems for exercise.
^ * To investigate a mixt amount of principal and interest. — Gas. The first rule agrees with
Srid'hara's {Gari. sdr. § 91). The second answers to one deduced from BRAiiMEGurxA by his
Commentator. Arithm. of Braiim. § 14.
* Pramiiia argument ; and phala fruit {S 70): principal and interest.
♦ 100 multiplied by 1 is 100 ; 5 by 12 is 60. Their sum l60 is the divisor. The first number,
100, multiplied by 1000, and divided by l60, is 625. The second 60, multiplied by 1000 and
divided by l60, gives 375. Gang.
40 LI'LA'VATI'. Chapter IV.
given quantity 1000, multiplied by unity, and divided by that, shows the
principal 625. This, taken from the mixt amount, leaves the interest 375. »
90. Rule:' The arguments taken into their respective times are divided
by the fruit taken into the elapsed times; the several quotients, divided by
their sum and multiplied by the mixt quantity, are the parts as severally
lent.
91. Example : The sum of six less than a hundred nishcas being lent in
three portions at interest of five, three and four per cent, an equal interest
was obtained on all three portions, in seven, ten, and five months respectively^
Tell, mathematician, the amount of each portion.'
Statement: 17 1 10 15 Mixt amount 94.*
100 100 100
5 3 4
Answer : the portions are 24, 28 and 42. The equal amount of interest 8f .
92. Rule: half a stanza.'
* Or the principal being known, the interest may be found by the role of five. Su'r.
- For determining parts of a compound sura. Sun.
» Since the amount of interest on all the portions is the same, put unity for its arbitrarily assumed
amount : whence corresponding principal sums are found by the rule of five. For instance, if a
hundred be the capital, of which five is the interest for a month, what is the capital of which unity
is the interest for seven months ? and, in like manner, the other principal suras are to be found.
Thus, a compound proportion being wrought, the time is multiplied by the argument to which it
appertains, and divided by the fruit taken into the elapsed time. Then, as the total of those
principal suras is to them severally, so is the given total to the respective portions lent. They are
thus severally found by the rule of three. Gan.
♦ Multiplying the argument and fruit by the times, and dividing one product by the other, there
result the fractions y^ Jj"^" J^ or «^ «/ SJ*; which reduced to a coramon denominator and
summed, make i^f or '^; multiplied by the mixt amount 94, they are '^", '*/", '^°; and
then divided by the sum ^^, they give >^8, ifs, «|8, or 24., 28, 42. Mono.
1 7
To find the interest, employ the rule of five ; 100 24. Answer, 8f . By the same method, witk ■
5
all three portions, the interest comes out the same. Su'r.
^ The capital sums, their aggregate amount, and the sum of the gains being given ; to apportion
the gains. — Gan. The rule is taken from Braumegupta, Arithm. § l6. It answers to Sijid'uara s,
Gan. sdr. § 109.
Sect. I. MIXTURE. 41
The contributions,' being multiplied by the mixt amount and divided by
the sum of the contributions, are the respective fruits.'*
93. Example. Say, mathematician, what are the apportioned shares of
three traders, whose original capitals were respectively fifty-one, sixty-eight,
and eighty-five ; which have been raised by commerce conducted by them
on joint stock, to the aggregate amount of three hundred?
Statement: 51,68,85. Sum: 204. Mixt amount : 300.
Answer: 75, 100, 125. These, less the capital sums, are the gains: viz.
24, 32, 40.
Or the mixt amount, less the sum of aggregate capital, is the profit on
the whole : viz. 96. This being multiplied by the contributions, and
divided by the sum of the contributions, gives the respective gains ; viz.
24, 32, and 40.
* Pracshepaca, that which is thrown in or mixt. — Gan. Joined together. — Sua.
^ The principle of the rule is obvious, being simply the rule of three.— Gan. ' If by this sum
of contributions, this contribution be had, then by the compound sum what will be ? The numbers
thus found, less the contributions, are the gains.' Vhand by Rang.
( 42 )
SECTION II.
FRACTIONS.
94. Rule :• half a stanza.
Divide denominators by numerators ; and then divide unity by those quo-
tients added together. The result will be the time of filling [a cistern by
several fountains.]*
95. Example. Say quickly, friend, in what portion of a day will [four]
fountains, being let loose together, fill a cistern, which, if severally opened,
they would fill in one day, half a day, the third, and the sixth part, respec-
tively ?
Statement: yiii.
Answer : ^th part of a day.
' To apportion the time for a mixture of springs to fill a well or cistern. — Gan. To solve an
instance relative to fractions. — Su'r. A similar problem occurs in Bbahmegupta's Arithmetic,
§8.
* The rule is grounded on a double proportion, according to Gan'es'a and RanganaVha j
but on the rule of three inverse, according to Su'ryada'sa and the Manoranjana: " if by one
fountain's time one day be bad ; then, by all the fountains' times in portions of days, summed to-
gether, what is had f" Or, " If, by this portion of a day one cistern be filled, how many by a
whole day ?" Then, after adding together the number of full cisterns, " if, by so many, one day
be had, then by one cistern what will be?*
( 43 ) W^
SECTION III.
PURCHASE and SALE.
96. Rule.' By the [measure of the] commodities,* divide their prices
taken into their respective portions [of the purchase] ; and by the sum of
the quotients divide both them and those portions severally multiplied by
the mixt sum : the prices and quantities are found in their order.'
97. Example :* If three and a half manas^ of rice may be had for one
dramma, and eight of kidney-beans* for the like price, take these thirteen
cdcitiis, merchant, and give me quickly two parts of rice with one of kidney-
beans ; for we must make a hasty meal and depart, since my companion
will proceed onwards.
Statement : f -f Mixt sum J^.
1 1
± ».
2 1
1 For a case where a mixture of portions, and composition of tilings, are given. — Gan. Con-
cerning measure of grain, &c. — Su'r. See Srid'hara, § II6.
- Panija: the measure of the grain or other commodity procurable for the current price in
the market. Su'r. and Mano.
* Founded on the rule of proportion : * if by this measure of goods this price be obtained, then
by this portion of goods what will be ?' So for the second commodity. Then, summing the prices
so found, ' if by this sum, these several prices, then by this mixt amount what prices f and, * if
by this sum, these portions, then by this mixt amount what quantities?' Rang.
■* See Vija-gaiiita, § 115; which is word for word the same.
• M&na or Mdnaca a measure; seemingly intending a particular one; the same with the
mddicd, according to the Manoranjana, if a passage in the margin of that commentary be genuine.
The M/tnicd is the quarter of the c'/uiri. See Ciiaturveda on Braiimegupta, § 11. But, ac-
cording to Gan'es'a, the mada (apparently the same with the mMic6) is at most an eighth of a
c'Mri; being a cubic span. See note to §236. A spurious couplet (see note on § 2.) makes it
the modern measure of weight containing forty shs.
6 Mu'dga: Phaseolus mungo; sort of kidney-bean,
OS
44 LI'LAVATI'. Chapter IV.
The prices, ■}■ \, multiplied by the portions f |, and divided by the goods
i A, make a x; the sum of which is f^. By this divide the same fractions
(± i) taken into the mixt sum (xj.) ; and the portions (| i) taken into that
mixt sum (^). There result the prices of the rice and kidney-beans, f
and -^ of a dramma; or 10 cdcinis and 13-l shells for the rice, and 2 cdcinis
and 6|- shells for the kidney-beans ; and the quantities are -^ and -^Jy of a
m</;2a of rice and kidney -beans respectively.
98. Example. If a pala of best camphor may be had for two nishcas,
and a pala of sandal-wood' for the eighth part of a dramma, and half a pala
of aloe-wood * also for the eighth of a dramma, good merchant, give me
tlie value of one nishca in the proportions of one, sixteen and eight : for I
wish to prepare a perfume.
Statement : 32 ^ -|^ Mixt sum 16.
1 1 i
1 16 8
Answer: Prices: drammas 14-| -f f.
Quantities: palas ■* V V*
1 Chandana: Santalum album.
■ Aguru: Aquillaria Agallochum.
»
( 45 )
SECTION IV.
99- Rule. Problem concerning a present of gems.^
From the gems subtract the gift multiplied by the persons ; and any ar-
bitrary number being divided by the remainders, the quotients are numbers
expressive of the prices. Or the remainders being multiplied together, the
product, divided by the several reserved remainders, gives the values in
whole numbers. "
100. Example. Four jewellers, possessing respectively eight rubies, ten
sapphires, a hundred pearls, and five diamonds, presented, each from his own
stock, one apiece to the rest in token of regard and gratification at meeting :
and they thus become owners of stock of precisely equal value. Tell me,
severally, friend, what were the prices of their gems respectively ?
Statement: Rub. 8; sapph. 10; pearls 100; diam. 5. Gift 1. Persons4.
Here, the product of the gift 1 by the persons 4, viz. 4, being severally
subtracted, there remain rubies 4; sapphires 6 ; pearls 96; diamond 1. Any
number arbitrarily assumed being divided by these remainders, the quotients
are the relative values. Taking it at random, they may be fractional values;
or by judicious selection, whole numbers: thus, put 96; and the prices
thence deduced are 24, I6, 1, 96 ; and the equal stock 233.
Or the remainders being multiplied together, and the product severally di-
vided by those remainders, the prices are 576, 384, 24, 2304 : and the equal
amount of stock (after interchange of presents) is 5592'
» The problem is an indeterminate one. The solution gives relative values only.
* Su'ryada'sa cites the V'lja-gaiiita for the solution of the problem. (See Vija-gati.^ 11. where
the same example occurs.) The principle is explained by RanganaVha without reference to
algebra. It is founded on the axiom, that " equality continues, if addition or subtraction of
equal things be made to or from equal things." After interchange of presents, each person has
one of every sort of gem, and a certain further number of one sort. Deducting then one of each
sort from the equalized stock of every person, remains a number of a single sort equal in value one
to the other. Put an arbitrary number for that value ; and make the proportion ; ' as this number
of gems is to this equal value, so is one gem to its price.' Rang.
( 46 )
SECTION V.
ALLIGATION} *
101. , Rule.s The sum of the products of the touch' and [weight of se-
veral parcels]* of gold being divided by the aggregate of the gold, the touch
of the mass is found. Or [after refining] being divided by the fine gold, the
touch is ascertained ; or divided by the touch, the quantity of purified gold
is determined.'
J02 — 103. Example. Parcels of gold weighing severally ten, four, two
and four mdshas, and of the fineness of thirteen, twelve, eleven and ten respec-
tively, being melted together, tell me quickly, merchant, who art conver-
sant with the computation of gold, what is the fineness of the mass ? If the
twenty mdshas above described be reduced to sixteen by refining, tell me
instantly the touch of the purified mass. Or, if its purity when refined be
sixteen, prithee what is the number to which the twenty mashas are re-
duced ?
Statement: Touch 13 12 11 10.
Weight 10 4 2 4.
Answer:* After melting, fineness 12.
Weight 20.
1 Suverda-gariita ; computation of gold ; that is, of its weight and fineness. Alligation medial.
Sri'd'iiara has similar rules, ^S9 — 108. The topic is unnoticed by Braumegupta ; but the
omission is supplied by his commentator. See Chaturve'da on Brahmegupta's Arithm. note
to Sect. 2.
- To find the fineness produced by mixture of parcels of gold; and, after refining, the weight,
if the fineness be known ; and the fineness, if the weight of refined gold be given. Gan.
3 Varna, colour of gold on the touchstone. Fineness of gold determined by that touch. See
§ 77. " The degrees of fineness increase as the weight is reduced by refining." — Gan.
* Gang.
* The solution of the problem is grounded on the rule of supposition, together with the rule of
three inverse : as shown at large by Uangan a't'ha and Gan'e's'a under this and § 77.
6 Products 130, 48, 22, 40. Their sura 240; divided by 20, gives 12: divided by iff, gives 15.
Sect. V. ALLIGATION. 47,
After refilling, the weight being sixteen wzfl*//a5 ; touch 15. The touch
being sixteen ; weight 15.
104. Rule." From the acquired fineness of the mixture, taken into the
aggregate quantity of gold, subtract the sum of the products of the weight
and fineness [of the parcels, the touch of which is known,] and divide the
remainder by the quantity of gold of unknown fineness; the quotient is the
degree of its touch.'
105. Example. Eight /was/m* of ten, and two of eleven by the touch,
and six of unknown fineness, being mixed together, the mass of gold, my
friend, became of the fineness of twelve ; tell the degree of unknown fine-
ness.
Statement: 10 11 Fineness of the
8 2 6 mixture 12.
Answer: Degree of the unknown fineness 15,
106. Rule,' The acquired fineness of the mixture being multiplied by
the sum of the gold [in the known parcels], subtract therefrom the aggre-
gate products of the weight and fineness [of the parcels] : divide the re-
mainder by the difference between the fineness of the gold of unknown
weight and that of the mass, the quotient is the weight of gold that was
unknown.
107- Example. Three mdshas of gold of the touch often, and one of
the fineness of fourteen, being mixt with some gold of the fineness of six-
teen, the degree of purity of the mixture, my friend, is twelve. How many
mdshas were there of the fineness of sixteen ?
Statement: 10 14 16 Fineness of the
3 1 mixture 12.
Answer : Mdsha 1 .
* To discover the fineness of a parcel of unknown degree of purity mixed with others of which
the touch was known. Gait.
' The rule being the converse of the preceding, the principle of it is obvious. Rang.
3 To find the weight of a parcel of known fineness, but unknown weights, raixt with other parcels
of known weight and fineness. Gan.
48 LI'LA'VATr. Chapter IV.
108. Rule.* Subtract the effected fineness from that of the gold of a
higher degree of touch, and that of the one of lower touch from the effected
fineness; the differences, multiplied by an arbitrarily assumed number, will
be the weight of gold of the lower and higher degrees of purity respectively. *
109. Example. Two ingots of gold, of the touch of sixteen and ten
respectively, being mixt together, the gold became of the fineness of twelve :
tell me, friend, the weight of gold in both lumps.
Statement: 16, 10. Fineness resulting 12.
Putting one, and multiplying by that ; and proceeding as directed ; the
weights of gold are found, mdshas 2 and 4. Assuming two, they are 4 and
8. Taking half, they come out 1 and 2. Thus, manifold answers are ob-
tained by varying the assumption.
' To find the weight of two parcels of given fineness and unknown weight. — Gan. and Sue.
A rule of alligation alternate in the simplest case. The problem is an indeterminate one : as is in*
timated by the author.
2 By as much as the higher degree of fineness exceeds the fineness effected, so much is the
measure of the weight of less pure gold ; and by as much as the lower degree of purity is under the
standard of the mixture, so much is the weight of the purer gold. Sur.
( 49 ) ^''■
SECTION VI.
PERMUTATION and COMBINATION.
110 — 112. Rule:' three stanzas.
Let the figures from one upwards, differing by one, put in the inverse
order, be divided by the same [arithmeticals] in the direct order ; and let the
subsequent be multiplied by the preceding, and the next following by the
foregoing [result]. The several results are the changes, ones, twos, threes,
&c.* This is termed a general rule.' It serves in prosody, for those versed
therein, to find the variations of metre ; in the arts [as in architecture] to
compute the changes upon apertures [of a building] ; and [in music] the
scheme of musical permutations;* in medicine, the combinations of different
savours. For fear of prolixity, this is not [fully] set forth.
113. A single example in prosody: In the permutations of the g&yatri
metre,' say quickly, friend, how many are the possible changes of the verse?
and tell severally, how many are the combinations with one, [two, three,] &c.
long syllables .''
Here the verse of the gciyatri stanza comprises six syllables. Wherefore,
' To find the possible permutations of long and short syllables in prosody ; combinations of
ingredients in pharmacy ; variations of notes, &c. in music; as well as changes in other instances.
Gan.
* According to Gan'e's'a, there is no demonstration of the rule, besides acceptation and ex-
perience. Rangana't'ha delivers an explanation of the principle of it grounded on the summing
of progressions.
' Commentators appear to interpret this as a name of the rule here taught ; s/icTMrana, or
gid'hdranorch'handu-gaiiila, general rule of prosodian permutation : subject to modification in
particular instances ; as in music, where a special method (as6d'h6ram) must be applied.
Gang. Sub.
♦ Chanda-meru : acertain scheme. — Gan. It is more fully explained by other commentators: but
the translator is not sufficiently conversant with the theory of music to understand the term distinctly.
' The GAyatri metre in sacred prosody is a triplet comprising twenty-four syllables : as in the
famous prayer containing the Brahmenical creed, called gAyatri, (See As. Res. vol. 10, p. 463).
But, in the prosody of profane poetry, the same number of syllables is distributed in a tetrastic :
and the verse consequently contains six syllables. (As. Res. vol. 10, p. 469.)
H
I
50 LI'LAVATI'. Chapter IV.
the figures from one to six are set down, and the statement of them, in
direct and inverse order is ? | J J |J. Proceeding as directed, the results are,
changes with one long syllable, 6"; with two, 15 ; with three, 20 ; with four,
15; with five, 6; with six, 1; with all short, 1. The sum of these is the
whole number of permutations of the verse, 64.
In like manner, setting down the numbers of the whole tetrastic, in the
mode directed, and finding the changes with one, two, &c. and summing
them, the permutations of the entire stanza are found: 16777216.
In the same way may be found the permutations of all varieties of metre,
from Uctd [which consists of monosyllabic verses] to Utcfiti [the verses of
which contain twenty-six syllables.]'
1 14. Example : In a pleasant, spacious and elegant edifice, with eight
doors,* constructed by a skilful architect, as a palace for the lord of the laud,
tell me the permutations of apertures taken one, two, three, &c.' Say, mathe-
matician, how many are the combinations in one composition, with ingredients
of six different tastes, sweet, pungent, astringent, sour, salt and bitter,*
taking them by ones, twos, or threes, &c.
Statement [1st Example]:
ST6543el
1234S6TS'
Answer : the number of ways in which the doors may be opened by ones,
twos, or threes, &c. is 8, 28, 56, 70, 56, 28, 8, 1. And the changes on the
IS 34 56T8
apertures of the octagon * palace amount to 255.
Statement 2d example : * 5 J 4 j J-
Answer : the number of various preparations with ingredients of divers
tastes is 6, 15, 20, 15, 6, l.f
12 3 4 5 6
* A«iat. Res. vol. 10, p. 468—473.
* Mdc'hi, aperture for the admission of air : a door or window ; (same with gax&csha ; — Gan'.)
a portico or terrace, {hhumi-visesha ; — Gang, and Su'r.)
^ The variations of one window or portico open (or terrace unroofed) and the rest closed ; two
open, and the rest shut ; and so forth,
* Amera-cosha 1.3. 18.
* An octagon building, with eight doors (or windows; porticos or terraces;) facing the eight
cardinal points of the horizon, is meant. See Gan.
+ Total number of possible combinations, 63. Gang.
( 51 )
I
CHAPTER V.
PROGRESSIONS.'
SECTION I.
ARITHMETICAL PROGRESSION.
115. Rule :" Half the period,' multiplied by the period added to unity,
is the sum of the arithmeticals one, &c. and is named their addition.* This!
being multiplied by the period added to two, and being divided by three, is
the aggregate of the additions.'
• Src-d-hi, a term employed by the older authors for any set of distinct substances or other things
put together.-GAN. It signifies sequence or progression. Sred'hUyavahdra, ascertainment or
determination of progressions.
' To find the suras of the arithmeticals.— Gan.
^ Pada the place.-GAN. Any one of the figures, or digits ; being that of which the sum is re-
quired.— Sub. The last of the numbers to be »ummed.-i»fa«6. See below : note to § 1 19.
♦ Sancaht6, the first sum, or addition of arithmeticals. 5ancattaicj,a, aggregate of additions,
summed sums, or second sum.
» The first figure is unity. The sum of that and the period being halved, is the middle figure.
As the figures decrease behind it, so they increase before it: wherefore the middle figure, multi-
plied by the period, .s the sum of the figures one, &c. continued to the period. The only proof of
the rule for the aggregate of sums, is acceptation.-GAN. It is a maxim, that ' a number multi-
pl.edby the next following arithmetical, and halved, gives the sum of the preceding:' wherefore,
&c. Sua. Camalacara is quoted by Ranganat'ha for a demonstration grounded on placing
the numbers of the progression in the reversed order under the direct one: where it becomes
obvious, that each pair of terms gives the like sum : wherefore this sum, multiplied by the number
of terms, is twice the sura of the progression.
h2
52 LI'LA'VATI'. Chapter V.
116. Example: Tell me, quickly, mathematician, the sums of the
several [progressions of] numbers one, &c. continued to nine; and the sum-
med sums of those numbers.
Statement: Arithmeticals : 12345678 9.
Answer: Sums: 1 3 6 10 15 21 28 36 45.
Summed sums: 1 4 10 20 35 56 84 120 165.
1 17. Rule :' Twice the period added to one and divided by three, being
multiplied by the sum [of the arithmeticals], is the sum of the squares.
The sum of the cubes of the numbers one, &c. is pronounced by the ancients
equal to the square of the addition.
118. Example: Tell promptly the sum of the squares, and the sum of
the cubes, of those numbers, if thy mind be conversant with the way of
summation.
Statement: 12345678 9-
Answer : Sum of squares 285. Sum of the cubes 2025.*
119- Rule:' The increase multiplied by the period less one, and added
to the first quantity, is the amount of the last.* That, added to the first,
' To find the sums of squares and of cubes. Sua, and Gan.
» Sums of the squares, 1 5 14 30 55 9i 140 204 285.
Sums of the cubes, 1 9 36 100 225 441 784 1296 2025.
' Where the increase is arbitrary. — Gakg. In such cases, to find the last term, moan amount,
and sura of the progression. — Su'r. From first term, common difference and period, to find the
whole amount, &c. — Gan.
♦ Adi, and muc'ha, xadana, vactra, and other synonyma of face ; the initial quantity of the pro-
gression ; (that, from which as an origin the sequence commences. — Su'r.) the first term.
Chaya, prachaya OT nttara ; the more (urf'Aica. — Su'r.) or siusvaent (vrldd'hi. — Gang.) by which
each term increases : the common increase or difference of the terms.
Antya ; the last term.
Mad'hya ; the middle term, or the mean of the progression.
Pada or gach'ha ; the period (so many days as the sequence reaches. — Si/r.) the number of
terms.
Saroord'hana, Sred'hi-phala or Gariita ; the amount of the whole ; the sum of the progression..
' It is called gan'iVa, because it is found by computation (gaiiani).' Gan.
Sect. I. PROGRESSION. 55
and halved, is the amount of the mean : Avhich, multiplied by the period, is
the amount of the wh6le, and is denominated /"^a/i/Va^ the computed sum.'
120. Example : A person, having given four di'ammas to pripsts on the
first day, proceeded, my friend, to distribute daily alms at a rate increasing
by five a day. Say quickly how many were given by him in half a
month ?
Statement: Initial quant. 4; Com. diff; 5 ; Period 15.
Here, First term 4. Middle term 39. Last term 74. Sum 585.
121. Example:* The initial term being seven, the increase five, and
the period eight, tell me, what are the numbers of the middle and last
amounts? And what is the total sum?
Statement : First term 7 ; Com. diff; 5 ; Period 8.
Answer: Mean amount *-^. Last term 42. Sum 196.
Here, the period consisting of an even number of days, there is no middle
day : wherefore the half of the sum of the days preceding and following the
mean place, must be taken for the mean amount : and the rule is thus
proved.
122. Rule:' half a stanza. The sum of the progression being divided
by the period, and half the common difference multiplied by one less than
the number of terms, being subtracted, the remainder is the initial quantity.*
123. We know the sum of the progression, one hundred and five; the
number of terms, seven ; the increase, three ; tell us, dear boy, the initial
quantity.
' The rule is founder! on the proportion ; as one day is to the increase of one day, or common
difference, so is the number of increasing terms to the total increase: which, added to the initial
quantity, gives the last term. Sun. &c.
^ To exhibit an instance of an even number of terms; where there can consequently be no
middle term [but a mean amount]. Gan.
' The difference, period and sum being given, to find the first term. Gan. Sx/r.
♦ The rule is converse of the preceding. Gan. and Sur.
54 ...LIXA'VATI'. Chapter V.
Statement: First term? Com. difF. 3 ; Period 7; Sum 105.
Answer : First tenn, 6.
Rule:' half a stanza.* The sum being divided by the period, and the
first term subtracted from the quotient, the remainder, divided by half of
one less than the number of terms, will be the common difference.'
124. Example: On an expedition to seize his enemy's elephants, a
king marched two yojanas the first day. Say, intelligent calculator, with
what increasing rate of daily march did he proceed, since he reached his
foe's city, a distance of eighty yojanas, in a week ?
Statement : First term 2 ; Com. diff. ? Period 7 ; Sum 80.
Answer: Com. diff. V-
125. Rule:* From the sum of the progression multiplied by twice the
common increase, and added to the square of the difference between the
first term and half that increase, the square root being extracted, this root
less the first term and added to the [above-mentioned] portion of the increase,
being divided by the increase, is pronounced' to be the period.
126. Example : A person gave three drammas on the first day, and
continued to distribute alms increasing by two [a day] ; and he thus bestowed
on the priests three hundred and sixty drammas : say quickly in how many
days?
Statement : First term 3 ; Com. diff. 2 ; Period? Sum 360.
Answer: Period 18.
' The first term, period and sum being known, to find the common difference which is
unknown. Gan.
* Second half of one, the first half of which contained the preceding rule. § 22.
' This rule also is converse of the foregoing. Gan.
♦ The first term,, commoa difference and sum being known, to find the period which i»
unknown. Gan.
' By Brahmegupta and the rest. — Gan, See Brahm. c. 12, k 18. and Gan. s6r, of Sr^d'h.
% 123. The rules are substantially the same ; the square being completed for the solution of the
quadratic equation in the manner taught by s'rid'kara (cited in Fyo-ga/w/a § 131) and by
Brahmegupta c. 8. § 32—33.
( 55 )
SECTION II.
GEOMETRICAL PROGRESSION.
1 27. Rule : ' a couplet and a half. The period being an uneven number
subtract one, and note " multipHcator;" being an even one, halve it and
note "square:" until the period be exhausted. Then the produce arising
from multiplication and squaring [of the common multiplier] in the inverse
order from the last,' being lessened by one, the remainder divided by the
common multiplier less one, and multiplied by the initial quantity, will be
the sura of a progression increasing by a common multiplier.'
128. Example : A person gave a mendicant a couple of cowry shells
first; and promised a two-fold increase of the alms daily. How many
nishcas does he give in a month }
Statement: First term, 2; Two-fold increase, 2; Period 30
Answer, 2 1474S36i6 cowries; or 104857 nishcas, 9 drammas, 9 panas
2 cacims, and 6 shells. '
'To find the sum of a progression, the increase being a muItiplier.-GAK. That is, the sum or
an,ncreas,ng geometrical progression. The rule agrees with PH>x'Ht/i,ACA's. (See Com on
Brahmegupta, c. 12, § 17.) It is borrowed from prosody (ibid)
J The last note is of course « muhipiicator:" for in e.xhausting the number of the period, you
arnve at last, at un.ty an uneven number. The proposed multiplier [the common multiplicator of
the progress-on] .s therefore put in the last place; and the operations of squaring and multiplying
by^it, are continued m the inverse order of the line of the notes. Gan'
» The effect of squaring and multiplying, as directed, is the same with the continued multipli-
cation of the mu fplier for as many times as the number of the period. For dividing by the "
mulfpher the product of the multiplication, continued to the uneven number, equals the product
ot mu .■pl.cai.on continued to one less than the number; and the extraction of the square root of
aproduct of multiphcation, continued to the even number, equals continued multiplication to half
that number. Conversely, squaring and multiplying equals multiplication for double and for one
more time.
Gan.
56 LI'LA'VATI'. Chapter V.
129. Example: The initial quantity being two, my friend; the daily
augmentation, a three-fold increase; and the period, seven; say what is in
this case the sum ?
Statement: First term, 2; three-fold increase, 3; Period, 7.
Answer: 2186.
130 — 131. Rule:* a couplet and an half.
The number of syllables in a verse being taken for the period, and the
increase two-fold, the produce of multiplication and squaring [as above
directed § 127] will be the number [of variations] of like verses. * Its square,
and square's square, less their respective roots, will be [the variations] of
alternately similar, and of dissimilar verses [in tetrastics].'
132. Example: Tell me directly the number [of varieties] of like,
alternately like, and dissimilar verses, respectively, in the metre named
anushtubh.*
• Incidently introduced in this place, showing a computation serviceable in prosody. — Sua. and
Mono. To calculate the variations of verse, which also are found by the sum of permutalion*
[§ 113].— Gan.
* Sanscrtt prosody distinguishes metre in which the four verses of the stanza are alike ; or the
alternate ones only so ; or all four dissimilar. Asiat. Res. vol. 10, Syn. tab. v. vi. & vii.
' The number of possible varieties of verse found by the rule of permutation [§ 113] is the same
with the continued multiplication of two : this number being taken, because the varieties of syllables
are so many; long and short. Accordingly this is assumed for the common multiplier. The
product of its continued multiplication is to be found also by this method of squaring and multi-
plying [§ 127] ; assuming for the period a number equal to that of syllables in the vei-se. The
varieties of alternately similar verse, arc the same with those of an uniform verse containing twice
as many syllables ; and the changes in four dissimilar verses are the same with those of one verse
comprising four limes as many syllables: excepting, however, that these permutations, embracing
all the possible varieties, comprehend those of like and half-alike metre. Wherefore ihe number
first found is squared, and this again squared, for twice, or four times, the number of places ;
and the roots of these squares subtracted, for the permutations of like and alternately like
verses. Gan'. &c.
The product of multiplication and squaring is the amount of the last term of the progression,
(the first term and common multiplier being equal).
♦ As. Res. vol. 10, p. 438, (Syn. tab.) p. 469. Uano.
Sect. II.
PROGRESSION.
57
Statement : Increase two-fold, 2 ; Period, 8.
Answer: Variations of like verses, Q56 ; of alternately alike verses,
65280; of dissimilar verses, 4294901760.'
' Possible varieties of the four verses of a tetrastic containing 32 syllables (8 to a verse) are
4294967296 [2 raised to its 32d power]: of which 4294901/60 are dissimilar; and 65536
[2 raised to its 1 6th power] similar: whereof 65280 alternately alike ; and 256 [2 raised to its
eighth power] wholly alike. — Mono, &c.
CHAPTER VI.
FLANE FIGURE.'
133. Rule : A side is assumed.* The other side, in the rival direction, is
• CshitrO'VyavaMra, determination of plane figure. CsMfra, as expounded by Gan'es'a, signi-
fies plane surface, bounded by a figure ; as triangle, &c. Vyavah&ra is the ascertainment of its
dimensions, as diagonal, perpendicular, area, &c.
Ranganat'ha distinguishes the sorts of plane figure, precisely as the commentator of Brah-
MEGUPTA. See Chat, on Brahm. 12, §21. Gan'esa says plane figure is four-fold; triangle,
quadrangle, circle and bow. Triangle (trt/asra, tricona or tribhuja) is a figure containing (tri)
three (asra or cona) angles, and consisting of as many (bhuja) sides. Quadrangle or tetragon
(chaturasra, chaturc&na, chaturbhvja) is a figure comprising (chatur) four (asra, &c.) angles or
sides. The circle and bow (he observes) need no definition. Triangle is either (j&tya) rectangu-
lar, as that which is first treated of in the text; or it is (tribhvja) trilateral [and oblique] like the
fruit of the Sringtita (TrapA natans). This again is distinguished according as the (lamba) per-
pendicular falls within or without the figure : viz. antar-lamba, acutangular ; bahirlamba, obtusan-
gular. Quadrangle also is in the first place twofold: with equal, or with unequal, diagonals. The
first of these, or ecjui-diagonal tetragon (sama-cartia) comprises four distinctions : 1st. sama-chatur-
bhuja, equilateral, a square ; 2d. vishama-chaturbhija, a trapezium ; 3d. dyaia-dirgha-chatiirasra,
oblong quadrangle, an oblique parallelogram ; 4th, 6i/ata-sama-laniba, oblong with equal perpen-
diculars ; that is, a rectangle. The second sort of quadrangle, or the tetragon with unequal dia-
gonals, (vishama-carna,) embraces six sorts: 1st. sama-chaturbhuja, equilateral, a rhomb; 2d.
sama-tribkuja, containing three sides equal ; 3d. sama-did-dvii-bhuja, consisting of two pairs of equal
sides, a rhomboid ; 4th. smna-dm-bhuja, having two sides equal ; 5th. vishama-chaturbhuja, com-
posed of four unequal sides, a trapezium ; 6ih. sama-lamba, having equal perpendiculars, a trape-
zoid. The several sorts of figures, observes the commentator, are fourteen ; the circle and bow
being but of one kind each. He adds, that pentagons CpanchHsraJ, &c. comprise triangles [and
are reducible to them].
* Bdhu, dosh, bhuja and other synonyma of arm are used for the leg of a triangle, or side of a
quadrangle or polygon : so called, as resembling the human arm. Gan. and Su/i.
PLANE FIGURE. 59
called the upright,' whether in a triangle or tetragon, by persons conversant
with the subject.
134. The square-root of the sum of the squares of those legs is the diago-
nal.- The square-root, extracted from the difference of the squares of the
diagonal and side, is the upright: and that, extracted from the difference of
the squares of the diagonal and upright, is the side.-'
135.* Twice the product of two quantities, added to the square of their
difference, will be the sum of their squares. The product of their sum and
difference will be the difference of their squares : as must be every where
understood by the intelligent calculator.'
136. Example. Where the upright is four and the side three, what is
the hypotenuse.? Tell me also the upright from the hypotenuse and side;
and the side from the upright and hypotenuse.
^
Statement: 4[_^ Side 3; Upright 4. Sum of their squares 25. Or
' Either leg being selected to retain this appellation, the others are distinguished by different de-
nominations. That, which proceeds in the opposite direction, meaning at right angles, is called
coti, uchch'hraya, vchch'hriti, or any other term signifying upright or elevated. Both are alike
sides of the triangle or of the tetragon, differing only in assumed situation and name.— Gan. and
Sc'r. The coti or upright is the cathetus.
"" A thread or oblique line from the two extremities of the legs, joining them, is the carna, also
termed iruti, sravana, or by any other words importing ear. It is the diagonal or diameter of a
tetragon.— Sua. Rang. &c. Or, in the case of a triangle, it is the diagonal of the parallelogram,
whereof the triangle is the half: and is the hypothenuse of a right-angled triangle.
' The rule concerns (jYifj/aJ rectangtilar triangles. The proof is given both algebraically and
geometrically* by Gan'e's'a; and the first demonstration is exhibited, both with and without alge-
bra, by Sc'hyada's'a. RanganaVha cites one of those demonstrations from his own brother Ca-
mala'cara; and the other from his father NafsiNHA, in the V/irfica, or critical remarks on the
(V6$andJ annotations of the Siromarii ; and censures the Sring6ra-tilaca for denying any proof of
the rule besides experience. Bha'scara has himself given a demonstration of the rule in his
algebraical work. Vij. Gad. § 146.
* A stanza of six verses o( anushtubh metre.
Ganesa here also gives both an algebraic and a geometrical proof of the latter rule; and an
algebraical one only of the first. See V'lj. Gan. under § 148; whence the latter demonstration is
borrowed ; and § 147, where the first of the rules is given an<l demonstrated.
• Csh£tritgat6popaUi, geoinrtrical deraoiistration.
UpapatU ttiyacta-criyayd, proof by algebra.
eo LIXAVATI. Chapter VL
product of the sides, doubled, 24 ; square of the difference 1 : added to-
gether, 25. Tlie square-root of this is the hypotenuse 5.
j\^ Difference of the squares [of 5 and 3] \6. Or suhfi 8, multiplied
3
by the difference 2, makes \6. Its square-root is the upright 4.
4 \^ Difference of squares, found as before, 9. Its square root is the side 3.
''137. Example. Where the side measures three and a quarter; and the-
upright, as much ; tell me, quickly, mathematician, what is the length of the
hypotenuse r
Statement: V | \^ Sum of the squares V/ o"" *f'- Since this has no
V
[assignable] root, the hypotenuse is a surd. A method of finding its approx-
imate root [follows :].
138. Rule: From the product of numerator and denominator,* multiplied
by any large square number assumed, extract the square-root : that, divided
by the denominator taken into the root of the multiplier, will be an approx-
imation.*
This irrational hypotenuse »^» [is proposed]. The product of its nume-
rator and denominator is 1352. Multiplied by a myriad (the square of a
hundred), the product is 23520000. Its root is 3677 nearly.' This divided
by the denominator taken into the square-root of the multiplier, viz. 800,
gives the approximate root 4 -|^. It is the hypotenuse. So in every simi-
lar instance.
' If the surd be not a fraction, unity raay be put for the denominator, and the rule holds good.
Gan.
* Here two quantities are assumed: the denominator and the arbitrary square number. The
multiplication of the numerator by the denominator is equivalent to the multiplication of the frac-
tion by the denominator twice; that is, by the square of the denominator. The surd, having been
thus multiplied by that and the arbitrary number, both squares, the square-root of the product is
divided by the denominator and by the root of the arbitrary number. The quotient is the root o£
the irrational quantity. — Gan. &c. A like rule occurs in Srid'iiara's compendium. — Gan, sdr~
§ 138.
' The remainder being unnoticed.
I
PLANE FIGURE. 61
139. Rule.* A side is put. From that multiplied by twice some assumed
number, and divided by one less than the square of the assumed number, an
upright is obtained. This, being set apart, is multiplied by the arbitrary
number, and the side as put is subtracted ; the remainder will be the hypo-
tenuse. Such a triangle is termed rectangular.
140. Or a side is put. Its square, divided by an arbitrary number, is set
down in two places : and the arbitrary number being added and subtracted,
and the sum and difference halved, the results are the hypotenuse and up-
right. Or, in like manner, the side and hypotenuse may be deduced from
the upright. Both results are rational quantities.
141. Example. The side being in both cases twelve, tell quickly, by
both methods, several uprights and hypotenuses, which shall be rational
numbers.
Statement: Side 12. Assumptions. The side, multiplied by twice that,
viz. 4, is 48. Divide by the square of the arbitrary number less one, viz. 3,
the quotient is the upright 16. This upright, multiplied by the assumed
number, is 32 : from which subtract the given side, the remainder is the hy-
potenuse 20. See
12
Assume three. The upright is 9; and hypotenuse 15. Or, putting five,
the upright is 5, and hypotenuse 13.
' Either the side or upright being given, to find the other two sides. — Sua. To find the up-
right and hypotenuse, from the side; or the side and hypotenuse from the upright. — Gav. The
problem is an indeterminate one, as is intimated by the author. The second rule is in substance
the same with Braiimegufta's for the upright and diagonal of a rectangle. See Braiim. 1?,
§35.
Su'ryada'sa demonstrates the first rule thus: ' In some triangle (which should be less than that
which has the given side) the upright is taken at double of some assumed number, and the side is
taken at one less than the assumed number. Then make proportion, " as this side to this upright,
so is the given side to its upright." Whence the given side, multiplied by twice the assumed num-
ber, and divided by one less than its square, is the upright. When this upright so found is muN
tiplied by the assumed number, the product is the sum of the side and hypotenuse : when divided
by it, the quotient is the difl'erence of the side and hypotenuse : for they increase and decrease by
virtue of that assumed number. Thus, subtracting the given side from that sum, the remainder is
the hypotenuse : or, adding it to the difference, the sum is the hypotenuse. Su'r.
62 Ll'LAVATl'. Chapter VI.
By the second method: the side, as put, 12. Its square 144. Divide by
2, the arbitrary number being two, the quotient is 72. Add and subtract
the arbitrary number, and halve the sum and diflFerence : the hypotenuse and
upright are found : viz. upright 35, hypotenuse 37. See
12
Assume four. The upright is 16, and hypotenuse 20. Assuming six, the
upright is 9 and hypotenuse 15.*
142. Rule :* Twice the hypotenuse taken into an arbitrary number, being
divided by the square of the arbitrary number added to one, the quotient is
the upright. This taken apart is to be multiplied by the number put : the
diiference between the product and the hypotenuse is the side.'
143. Example: Hypotenuse being measured by eighty-five, say
promptly, learned man, what uprights and sides will be rational ?
Statement: The hypotenuse 85, being doubled, is 170; and multiplied
by an arbitrary number two, is 340. This, divided by the square of the
The demonstration of the second method is given by Gan:^sa', and similarly by Su'rtada'sa
and RanganaVha. ' Assume any number for the difference between the uprightand hypotenuse.
The difference of their squares (which is equal to the square of the given side) being divided by
that assumed difference, the quotient is the sum of the upright and hypotenuse. For the difference
of the squares is equal to the product of the sum and difference of the roots. (§ 135.) The upright
and hypotenuse are therefore found by the rule of concurrence' (§ 55). Gan. &c.
' In like manner, if the upright be given, l6. Its square 256, divided by the arbitrary number
2, is 128. The arbitrary number subtracted and added, makes 126 and 130; which halved gives
the side 63 and hypotenuse 65. Gang, and Sua.
" From the hypotenuse given, to find the side and upright in rational numbers. — Gan. The
problem is an indeterminate one.
' Let the upright in a figure be any assumed number doubled ; and the hypotenuse be unity added
to the square of that arbitrary number. Thence a proportion, as before : If with this hypotenuse,
this upright ; then with the given hypotenuse, what is the upright? It is consequently found : viz.
twice the given hypotenuse multiplied by the arbitrary number, and divided by the square of that
number with unity added to it. If that be multiplied by the arbitrary number, the product is the
sum of the hypotenuse and side ; if divided by it, their difference. Hence, by the rule of concui<-
rence (§ 55), the side and hypotenuse are found. But here, for brevity, the hypotenuse, being already
known, is subtracted from the sum of that and the side. Su a.
.: / iiar-i/ i;^
PLANE FIGURE.
65
arbitrary number added to one, viz. 5, is the upright 68. This upright,
multiplied by the arbitrary number, makes 136: and subtracting the hypo-
tenuse, the side comes out 51. See N
68 \85
51
Or putting four, the upright will be 40; and side 75. See 40 p'-^
75
144. Rule : Or else hypotenuse is doubled and divided by the square
of an assumed number added to one. Hypotenuse, less that quotient, is the
upright. The same quotient, multiplied by the assumed number, is the
side.*
The same hypotenuse 85. Putting two, the upright and side are 51 and
68. Or, with four, they are 75 and 40.
Here the difference between side and upright is in name only, and not
essential.
145. Rule:* Let twice the product of two assumed numbers be the
upright; and the difference of their squares, the side: the sum of their
squares will be the hypotenuse, and a rational number.'
' The assumed upright in the small triangle was before taken at twice a number put. The
assumption is now two, and hypotenuse is put as there stated. Then proportion being made as
before, the quotient is multiplied by the arbitrary number, because, in comparison with the preced-
ing, It was just so much less. The quotient, as it comes out, is the difference between the hypo-
tenuse and side: and, that being subtracted from the hypotenuse, the residue is the side.-SuR.
This and the preceding rule are founded on the same principle ; differing only in the order of the
operation and names of the sides: the same numbers come out for the side and upright in one
mode, which were found for the upright and side by the other.
« Having taught the mode of finding a third side, from any two, of hypotenuse, upright and side ;
and in like manner from one, the other two; the author now shows a method of findin« all three
rational [none being given.]-GAN. The problem is an indeterminate one.
' The demonstration is by resolution of a quadratic equation involving several unknown : Let
the length of the side be ya ], and that of the upright cal. The sum of their squares is j/as 1 cor, 1.
It is a square quantity. Putting it equal to „iv 1, the root of this side of the equation is ni 1 ; and
those of the other side are to be found by the rule of the affected square* Assuming either term
for the affected square, the other will be the additive. I^t yavihe the proposed square, and ca v 1
the additive. Then the coefficient being a square, the roots are to be found by the rule {Vij. g/,n.
h 95). Here a fraction of ca is put ; an arbitrary number for the numerator, and another arbitrary
• yH- gan. ch. 3.
64 LI'LAVATI'. Chapter VI.
146. Example. Tell quickly, friend, three numbers, none being given,
with which as upright, side and hypotenuse, a rectangular triangle may be
[constructed.]
Statement. Let two numbers be put, 1 and 2. From these the side, up-
right and hypotenuse are found, 4, 3, 5. Or, putting 2 and 3, the side, up-
right and hypotenuse deduced from them, are 12, 5, 13. Or let the assumed
numbers be 2 and 4: from which will result 16, 12, 20. In like manner,
manifold [answers are obtained].
147. Rule^. The square of the ground intercepted between the root and
tip, is divided by the [length of the] bambu; and the quotient severally
added to, and subtracted from, the bambu : the moieties [of the sum and
difference] will be the two portions of it representing hypotenuse and up-
right.*
148. Example.' If a bambu, measuring thirty-two cubits and standing
upon level ground, be broken in one place, by the force of the wind, and
one for the denominator. For instance ca f. Then by the method taught {Vij. gan. § 95) the
least and greatest roots come out ca -^, ca -J^ Here, in the place of the numerator of the least root,
is the difi'erence of the squares ol the assumed numbers; and, in that of the denominator, twice their
product. So, in place of the numerator of the greatest root, is the sum of the squares ; and, in
that of the denominator, twice the product. The least root is the value o( i/a, the fraction ca -f^.
Then, by the pulverizer,* the multiplier and quotient come out 5 and 12. The multiplier is the
value oi ya and is the side. The quotient is the value of ca and is the upright 12. Substituting
with it for ca in the greatest root, this is found 13. It is the value of ni and is the hypotenuse.
Thus the side, upright and hypotenuse are obtained 5, 12, 13. This is the operation directed by
the rule, §145. Gan.
' The sum of hypotenuse and upright being known, as also the side, to discriminate the hy-
potenuse and upright. — Gan. The rule bears reference to the example which follows.
* The height from the root to the fracture is the upright. The remaining portion of the bambu
is hypotenuse. The whole bambu, therefore, is the sum of hypotenuse and upright. The ground
intercepted between the root and tip is the side : it is equal to the square root of the difference
between the squares of the hypotenuse and upright. Hence the sqiiare of the side, divided by the
sum of the hypotenuse and side, is their difference [§ 135]. With these (sum and difference) the
upright and hypotenuse are found by the rule of concurrence (§ 55). Gan. .
' See Arithra. of Brahmeoupta under § 41 ; and Vij.-gaii. § 124; where the same example
occurs. ' f
• Vija'gtmita, ch. 2.
PLANE FIGURE. m
the tip of it meet the ground at sixteen cubits : say, mathematician, at how
many cubits from the root is it broken ?
Statement. Bambu 32. Interval between the root and tip of the bambu
16. It is the side of the triangle. Proceeding as directed, the upper and
lower portions of the bambu are found 20 and 12. See figure
20
TO
12
^•-fo
16
149. Rule.* The square [of the height] of the pillar is divided by the
distance of the snake from his hole ; the quotient is to be subtracted from
that distance. The meeting of the snake and peacock is from the snake's
hole half the remainder, in cubits. -
150. Example.' A snake's hole* is at the foot of a pillar, and a peacock
is perched on its summit. Seeing a snake, at the distance of thrice the pil-
lar, gliding towards his hole, he pounces obliquely upon him. Say quickly
at how many cubits from the snake's hole do they meet, both proceeding aa
equal distance ?
Statement. Pillar 9. It is the upright. Distance of the snake from his
hole 27. It is the sum of hypotenuse and side. Proceeding as directed, the
meeting is found in cubits; viz. 12.* See figure qP^^
^12\ 15
27
The sum of the side and hypotenuse being known, as also the upright, to discriminate the
hypotenuse and side. Gan.
* The rule bears reference to the example which follows. The principle is the same with that
of the preceding rule.
* This occurs also in some copies of the V'lja-ganita, after § 139 ; as appears from the commen-
tary of Su'ryada'sa, giving an interpretation of it in that place. It is borrowed from the Arithm.
of Brahmegupta under § 41, with a change of a snake and a peacock substituted for a rat and
a cat.
* Subtracted from the sum of hypotenuse and side, this leaves 15 for the hypotenuse. The
saake had proceeded the same distance of 15 cubits towards his hole, as the peacock in pouncing
upon him. Their progress is therefore equal. Su'r.
K
66i LI'LA'VATI'. Chapter VI.
151. Rule.^ The quotient of the square of the side divided by the dif-
ference between the hypotenuse and upright is twice set down : and the dif-
ference is subtracted from the quotient [in one place] and added to it [in the
other]. The moieties [of the remainder and sum] are in their order the up-
right and hypotenuse.*^
This' is to be generally applied by the intelligent mathematician.
152. Friend, the space, between the lotus [as it stood] and the spot
where it is submerged, is the side. The lotus as seen [above water] is the
difference between the hypotenuse and upright. The stalk is the upright:*
for the depth of water is measured by it. Say, what is the depth of
water ?
153. Example.' In a certain lake swarming Avith ruddy geese* and
cranes, the tip of a bud of lotus was seen a span above the surface of the
water. Forced by the wind, it gradually advanced, and was submerged at
the distance of two cubits. Compute quickly, mathematician, the depth of
water.
Statement: Diff. of hypotenuse and upright ^ cubit. Side 2 cubits.
Proceeding as directed, the upright and hypotenuse are found, viz. upright
'/. It is the depth of water. Adding to it the height of the bud, the hy-
potenuse comes out V • See
154. Rule.^ The height of the tree, multiplied by its distance from the
' The difference between the hypotenuse and upright being known, as also the side, to find the
xipright and hypotenuse. Gan.
* The demonstration, distinctly set forth under a preceding rule, is applicable to this. Gan.
^ Beginning from the instance of the broken bambu (§ 147) and including what follows. Gai/.
* The sides, constituting the figure in the example which follows, are here set forth, to assist
the apprehension of the student. Sun. and Gan.
' See Arithm. of Buahm. under § 41 ; and V'tj.-gan. ^ 125: where the same example is in-
serted.
* Anas Casarca.
' The sum of the hypotenuse and upper portion of the upright being given, and the lower por-
tion being known; as also the side: to discriminate the portion of the upright from the hypote-
nuse. — Gas'. As in several preceding instances, a reference to the example is requisite to the
understanding of the rule. The same problem occurs in BRAUMiic.urTA's Arithmetic, § 35 i and
is repeated in the Vija-ganila, § 135.
...J , PLANE FIGURE. 67
pond, is divided by twice the height of the tree added to the space between
the tree and pond : the quotient will be the measure of the leap.
155. Example. From a tree a hundred cubits high, an ape descended
and went to a pond two hundred cubits distant: Avhile another ape, vault-
ing to some height off the tree, proceeded with velocity diagonally to the
same spot. If the space travelled by them be equal, tell me, quickly, learned
man, the height of the leap, if thou have diligently studied calculation.
Statement: Tree 100 cubits. Distance of it from the pond 200. Pro-
ceediug as directed, the height of the leap comes out 50.* See 50K. o
100
•?<?
200
156. Rule.- From twice the square of the hypotenuse subtract the sum
of the upright and side multiplied by itself, and extract the square-root of
the remainder. Set down the sum twice, and let the root be subtracted in
one place and added in the other. The moieties will be measures of the side
and upright.'
157- Example. Where the hypotenuse is seven above ten ; and the sum
of the side and upright, three above twenty ; tell them to me, my friend.
Statement: Hypotenuse 17- Sum of side and upright 23. Proceeding
as directed, the side and upright are found 6 and 15.
15
• The hypotenuse is 250: and the entire upright 150.
* Hypotenuse being known, as also the sum of the side and upright, or their difference ; to dis-
criminate those sides. Gan.
' In like manner, the difference of the side and upright being given, the sanie rule is appli-
cable. — Gan. Using the difference instead of the sum.
The principle of the rule is this : the square of the hypotenuse is the sum of the squares of the
sides. But the sum of the squares, with twice the product of the sides added to it, is the square of
the sum ; and, with the same subtracted, is the square of the difference. Hence, cancelling equal
quantities affirmative and negative, twice the square of the hypotenuse will be the sum of the
squares of the sum and difference. Therefore, subtracting from twice the square of hypotenuse
the square of the sum, the remainder is the square of the difference ; or conversely, subtracting
the square of the difference, the residue is the square of the sum. The square-root is the sura or
the difference. With these, the sides are found by the rule of concurrence. Gan. and Sub.
K 2
68
LI'LAVATI'.
Chapter VT.
158. Example. Where the difference of the side and upright is seven
and hypotenuse is thirteen, say quickly, eminent mathematician, what are
the side and upright r^
Statement. Difference of side and upright 7- Hypotenuse 13. Pro-
ceeding as directed, the side and upright come out 5 and 12. See
12
.13
159. Rule." The product of two erect bambus being divided by their
sum, the quotient is the perpendicular' from the junction [intersection] of
threads passing reciprocally from the root [of one] to the tip [of the other.]
The two bambus, multiplied by an assumed base, and divided by their sum,
are the portions of the base on the respective sides of the perpendicular.
160. Example.* Tell the perpendicular drawn from the intersection of
strings stretched mutually from the roots to the summits of two bambus
fifteen and ten cubits high standing upon ground of unknown extent.
Statement: Bambus 15, 10. The perpendicular is found 6.
Next to find the segments of the base : let the ground be assumed 5 ; the
segments come out 3 and 2. Or putting 10, they are 6 and 4. Or taking
15, they are 9 and 6. See the figures
15
10
3 2
15
10
9 0'
In every instance the perpendicular is the same : viz. 6*
The proof is in every case by the rule of three : if with a side equal to tlie
• This example of a case where the difference of the sides is given, is omitted, by Su'ryada'sa,
but noticed by Gan'esa. Copies of the text, vary; some containing, and others omitting, the
instance.
^ Having taught fully the method of finding the sides in a right-angled triangle, the author next
propounds a special problem. — Gan. To find the perpendicular, the base being unknown. — Su'r.
^ Lamba, Avalamba, Valamha, Ad'holamba, the perpendicular.
• See Vija-ganita, § 127.
• However the base may vary by assuming a greater or less quantity for it, the perpendicular
will still be the same. Gan.
PLANE FIGURE. 69
base, the bambu be the upright, then with the segment of the base what
will be the upright?*
161. Aphorism.'' That figure, though rectilinear, of which sides are pro-
posed by some presumptuous person, wherein one side^ exceeds or equals the
sum of the other sides, may be known to be no figure.
162. Example: Where sides are proposed two, three, six and twelve in
a quadrilateral, or three, six and nine in a triangle, by some presumptuous
dunce, know it to be no figure.
Statement : The figures are both incongruous. Let strait rods exactly of
the length of the proposed sides be placed on the ground, the incongruity,
will be apparent.
4
163 — 164. Rule' in two couplets: In a triangle, the sum of two sides,
being multiplied by their difference, is divided by their base :* the quotient
' On each side of the perpendicular, are segments of the base relative to the greater and smaller
bam bus, and larger or less analogously to them. Hence this proportion. " If with the sum of the
bambus, this sum of the segments equal to the entire base be obtained, then, with the smaller
bambu, what is had ?" The answer gives the segment, which is relative to the least bambu
Again: " if with a side equal to the whole base, the higher bambu be the upright, then with aside
eciual to the segment found as above, what is had i" The answer gives the perpendicular let fall
from the intersection, of the threads. Here a multiplicator and a divisor equal to the entire base
are both cancelled as equal and contrary; and there remain the product of the two bambus for
numerator and their sura for denominator. Hence the rule. Gan.
The aphorism explains the nature of impossible figures proposed by dunces. — Su'r. It serves
as a definition of plane figure (cshitra). — Gan. In a triangle or other plane rectilinear figure,
one side is always less than the sum of the rest. If equal, the perpendicular is nought, and there
is no complete figure. If greater, the sides do not meet. — Su'r. Containing no area, it is no
figure.— CawOT. Rang.
' The principal or greatest side. — Gan. Caz«». Rang.
* The rods will not meet. — Su'r.
' In any triangle to find the perpendicular, segments and area. This is introductory to a fullec
consideration of areas.— Gan. and Sua. It is taken from Brahmegupta, 12, § 22.
Bhumi, bhu, cu, ma/ii, or any other term signifying earth ; the ground or base of a triangle or
other plane figure. Any one of the sides is taken for the base ; and the rest are termed simply^
sidcs» Gan'e's'a restricts the term to the greatest side. See note § l68.
Lamia, &c. the perpendicular. See note on §. 159.
70 XT L A' V ATT. Chapter VI.
is subtracted from, and added to, the base which is twice set down : and
being halved, the results are segments corresponding to those sides. "^
164. The square-root of the difference of squares of the side and its own
segment of the base becomes the perpendicular. Half the base, multiplied
by the perpendicular," is in a triangle the exact' area.*
Ab^d'lid, abad'hi, avabad'M, segment of the base. These are terms introduced by earlier writers.
From the point, where a perpendicular falling from the ape.\ (mastaca) meets the base, the two
portions or divisions of the ground on their respective sides [or, if the perpendicular fall without the
figure in an obtuse-angled one, on the same side] are distinguished by this name.
Phala, Gatiita, Cshetra-phala, Sama-coshia-ntili; the measure of like compartments, or number
of equal squares of the same denomination (as cubit, fathom, finger, &c.) in which the dimension
of the side is given : the area or superficial content. It is the product of multiplication of length
by breadth. Gan. and Sua.
* The relative, dependent, or corresponding segments. The smaller segment answers to the less
side; the larger segment to the greater side. Gan.
* Or half the perpendicular taken into the base. Gan.
' Sphuta-phala distinct or precise area ; opposed to asphuta — or si'hula-phala iadistiact or gross
area. See § l67 — and Arithm. of Braiim. § 21.
* Demonstration : In both the right-angled triangles formed in the proposed triangular figure,
one on each side of the perpendicular, this line is the upright ; the side is hypotenuse, and the
correspondent segment is side. Hence, subtracting the square of the perpendicular from the square
of the side, the remainder is square of the segment. So, subtracting the square of the other side,
there remains the square of the segment answering to it. Their difference is the difference of the
squares of the segments and is equal to the difference of the squares of the sides ; since an equal
quantity has been taken from each : for any two quantities, less an equal quantity, have the same
difference. It is equal to the product of the sum and difference of the simple quantities. There-
fore th'S sum of the sides, multiplied by their difference, is the difference of the squares of the
segments. But the base is the sura of the segments. The difference of the squares, divided by
that, is the difference of the segments. From which, by the rule of concurrence (,§ 55) the seg-
ments are found.
The square-root of the difference between the squares of the side and segment (taken as hypote-
nuse and side) is the upright. It is the perpendicular.
Dividing the triangle by a line across the middle, and placing the two halves [or parts] of the
upper portion disjoined by the perpendiculur, on the two sides of the lower portion, an oblong is form-
ed ; inwhich the halfof the perpendicular is one side, and the base is the other. See
Wherefore half the perpendicular, multiplied by the base, is the area or num-
ber of equal compartments. Or half the base, multiplied by the pcrpendicu- 6\
lar, is just so much. — Gax.
If with the sum of the sides, this difference be had, then with this sura of the segments, that is.
PLANE FIGURE, 71
165. Example. In a triangular figure, in which the base is fourteen and
its sides thirteen and fifteen, tell quickly the length of the perpendicular,
the segments, and the dimensions by like compartments termed area.
Statement: Base 14. Sides 13 and 15. Proceeding as directed, the seg-
ments are found, 5 and 9 ', and the perpendicular, la : the area, 84. See
166. Example. In a triangle, wherein the sides measure ten and seven-
teen, and the base nine, tell me promptly, expert mathematician, the seg-
ments, perpendicular and area.
Statement: Sides 10 and 17. Base 9- By the rule § 163, the quotient
found is 21. This cannot be subtracted from the base. Wherefore the base
is subtracted from it. Half the remainder is the segment, 6 ; and is nega-
tive : that is to say, is in the contrary direction.* Thus the two segments
with the base which is their sum, what is obtained ? Here, as the demand increases, the fruit
decreases: wherefore, by the inverse rule of three §74', the difference of the sides, multiplied by
their sum, and divided by the base, gives the difference of the segments. With that and the base,
which is their sum, the segments are found by the rule of concurrence § 55.
In an acute-angled triangle, two right-angled triangles are formed by the perpendicular within
it. The side becomes an hypotenuse, the segment a side, and the unknown perpendicular an up-
right alike in both. Hence (§ 134) the square-root of the difference of the squares of the side and
segment is the perpendicular.
The perpendicular is the breadth ; and the base is the length. It is exactly so in the lower
part; but not so in the upper part: for there the figure terminates in a sharp point. Wherefore
half the length is the length to be multiplied. If two triangles be placed within a quadrilateral, it
is readily perceived, that the triangle is half the quadrilateral. Or if an acute-angled triangle be
figured, two right-angled triangles are formed by the perpendicular; and their bases are the seg-
ments. The moieties of the segments, multiplied by the perpendicular, are the areas of the two
rectangular triangles. Their sum is the area of the proposed triangle. — Sun.
In an obtuse-angled triangle also, the base multiplied by half the perpendicular is the area.
Gan.
' When the perpendicular falls without the base, as overpassing the angle in consequence of
the side exceeding the base, the quotient found by the rule § 10'3 cannot be taken from the base :
for both origins of sides are situated in the same quarter from the fall of the perpendicular. There-
72 LI' LAV ATI'. Chapter VL
are found 6 and 15. From which, both ways too, the perpendicular comes
out 8. The area, 36. See
10\ "\J7
167. Rule.^ Half the sum of all the sides is set down in four places;
and the sides are severally subtracted. The remainders being multiplied to-
gether, the square-root of the product is the area, inexact in the quadrila-
teral, but pronounced exact in the triangle."
168. Example. In a quadrilateral figure, of which the base' is fourteen,
the summit* nine, the flanks thirteen and twelve, and the perpendicular
twelve, tell the area as it was taught by the ancients.
fore subtracting the base from the quotient, half the residue is the segment and situated on the
contrary side, bein" negative. Wherefore, as both segments stand on the same side, the smaller
is comprehended in the greater ; and, in respect of it, is negative. Thus all is congruous and un-
exceptionable. — Gan. When the sum of the segments is to be taken, as they have contrary
signs, affirmative and negative, the difference of the quantities is that sum. — Sur. See Vij.-gan.
§5.
• For finding the gross area of a quadrilateral ; and, by extension of the rule, the exact area of
a triangle.— Gan. For finding the area by a method delivered by Sbid'haua, as a general one
common to all figures.— Rang. Excepting an equidiagonal quadrilateral.— Cffum. Sri'd'hara's
rule, which is here censured, occurs in his compendium of Arithmetic. — Gaii. sir. § 126. See
likewise Arithm. of Brahmegupta, §21.
» In the case of a triangle, half the sum of the three sides is four times set down; the three
sides are subtracted severally in three instances : in the fourth, it remains unchanged. The square-
root of the product of such four quantities is the exact area. — Gan.
If the three remainders be added together, their sum is equal to half the sum of all the sides.
The product of the continual multiplication of the three remainders being taken into the sum of
those remainders, the product so obtained is equal to the product of the square of the perpendi-
cular taken into the square of half the base. It is a square quantity : for a square, multiplied by
a square, gives a square. The square-root being extracted, the product of the perpendicular by
half the base is the result : and that is the area of the trikngle. Therefore the true area is thus
found. In a quadrilateral, the product of the multiplication does not give a square quantity : but
' an irrational one. Its approximate root is the area of the figure ; not, however, the true one : for,
when divided by the perpendicular, it should give half the sum of the base and summit.— Sur.
» The greatest of the four sides is called the base.— Gan. This definition is, however, too re-
stricted. See § 185 and 178. The notion of it is taken from Brahmegupta. Arithm.
§38.
* Muc'/ia, vadana, or other terra expressing mouth : the side opposite to the base ; the summit.
PLANE FIGURE.
Statement: Base 14. Summit 9. Sides 13 and 12. Perp. 12.
14
By the method directed, the result obtained is the surd 19800, of which
the approximated root is somewhat less than a hundred and forty -one : 141.
That, however, is not in this figure the true area. But, found by tlie me-
thod which will be set forth (§ 175), the true area is 138.
Statement of the triangle before instanced ,, /
By this method the area comes out the same : viz. 84.
169 — 170. Aphorism comprised in a stanza and a half: Since the diago-
nals of the quadrilateral are indeterminate, how should the area be in this
case determinate ? The diagonals, found as assumed by the ancients,' do
not answer in another case. With the same sides, there are other diagonals ;
and the area of the figure is accordingly manifold.
For, in a quadrilateral, opposite angles, being made to approach, contract
their diagonal as they advance inwards : while the other angles, receding
outwards, lengthen their diagonal. Therefore it is said, " with the same
sides, there are other diagonals."
171. How can a person, neither specifying one of the perpendiculars, nor
cither of the diagonals, ask the rest?'' or how can he demand a determinate
area, while they are indefinite ?
172. Such a questioner is a blundering devil.' Still more so is he, who
answers the question. For he considers not the indefinite nature of the
lines* in a quadrilateral figure.
* By Srio'hara and tbe rest. Gan.
* The perpendiculars, diagonals, &c. Gan.
' Pis&cha (a demon or vampire). So termed, because he blunders. Su'r.
* Of the diagonal and perpendicular lines. Sun.
74
LI' LA' V ATI'.
Chapter VI.
173 — 175. Rule* in two and a half stanzas : Let one diagonal of an equi-
lateral tetragon be put as it is given. Then subtract its square from four
times the stjuare of the side. The square-root of the remainder is the measure
of the second diagonal.
174. The product of unequal diagonals multiplied together, being di-
vided by two, will be the precise area in an equilateral tetragon. But in a
regular one with equal diagonals, as also in an oblong,* the product of the
side and upright will be so.
175. In any other quadrilateral with equal perpendiculars,* the moiety
of the sum of the base and summit, multiplied by the perpendicular, [is the
area.]
176. Mathematician, tell both diagonals and the area of an equilateral
quadrangular figure, whose side is the square of five : and the area of it, the
diagonals being equal: also [the area] of an oblong, the breadth of which
is six and the length eight.
Statement of first figure 25
Here, taking the square-root of
the sum of the squares (§ 134), the diagonal comes out the surd 1250, alike
both ways. The area 625.
Assume one diagonal thirty ; the other is found 40 ; and the area 6OO. See
Put one diagonal fourteen : the other is found 48 ; and area 336. See
' In an equilateral tetragon, one diagonal being given, to find the second diagonal and the area:
also in an equi-perpendicular tetragon [trapezoid] to find the area. — Gan. Equilateral tetragons
are twofold : with equal, and with unequal, diagonals. The first rule regards the equilateral te-
tragon with unequal diagonals [the rhomb.] Su'r.
* Ayata: a long quadrilateral which has pairs of equal sides. Gan.
* In an unequal quadrilateral figure, to find the area. — SuR. In any quadrilateral with two,
or with three, equal sides, or with all unequal, but having equal perpendiculars. Rang.
Statement of the oblong
PLANE FIGURE. 73.
Area 48.
I
177. Example. Where the summit is eleven; the base twice as much
as the summit; and the flanks thirteen and twenty; and the perpendicular
twelve ; say what will be the area ?
11
\ i\. The gross area (i 167) is 250. The true
Statement: 13\ 12! \20 /-:,«/-%• ,,L
\ i \r area (^ 175) is I98.
22
Or making three portions of the figure, and severally finding their areas,
and summing them, the principle may be shown. ^ ^^
13V ■ loi \20
178. Example. Declare the diagonal, perpendicular and dimensions of
the area, in a figure of which the summit is fifty-one, the base seventy-five,
the left side sixty-eight, and the other side twice twenty.
179. Aphorism showing the connexion of area, perpendicular and dia-
gonal :
If the perpendicular be known, the diagonal is so: if the diagonal be
known, the perpendicular is so : if they be definite, the area is determinate.
For, if the diagonal be indefinite, so is the perpendicular. Such is the
meaning.
179 continued. Rule for finding the perpendicular:' In the triangle
within the quadrilateral, the perpendicular is found as before taught :^ the
diagonal and side being sides, and the base a base.'
Here, to find the perpendicular, a diagonal, proceeding from the extre-
' The diagonal being either given or assumed. Gan.
» See§ 163 and l64.
* The summit becomes base of the second triangle; the diagonal is one leg; and the remaining
side of the quadrilateral, the other. Rang.
76
LI'LAVATI'.
Chapter VI.
mity of the left side to the origin of the right one, is assumed, put at
seventy-seven. See
By this a triangle is constituted within the quadrilateral. In it that dia-
gonal is one side, 77 ; the left side is another, 68 ; the base continues such,
75. Then, proceeding by the rule (§ 163 — 164), the segments are found —■
and ^^•, and the perpendicular.
308
3 ■
See figure.
180. Rule to find the diagonal, when the perpendicular is known :
The square-root of the difference of the squares of the perpendicular and
its adjoining side is pronounced the segment. The square of the base less
that segment being added to the square of the perpendicular, the square-
root of the sum is the diagonal.
In that quadrilateral, the perpendicular from the extremity of the left
side is put ^. Hence the segment is found ^-~ ; and by the rule (§ 180)
the diagonal comes out 77-
181 — 182. Rule to find the second diagonal [two stanzas] :
In this figure, first a diagonal is assumed.' In the two triangles situated
one on either side of the diagonal, this diagonal is made the base of each ;
and the other sides are given : the perpendiculars and segments^ must be
found. Then the square of the difference of two segments on the same
side' being added to the square of the sum of the perpendiculars, the square-
root of the sum of those squares will be the second diagonal in all tetragons.*
In the same quadrilateral, the length of the diagonal passing from the
extremity of the left side to the origin of the right one, is put 77. Within
the figure cut by that diagonal line, two triangles are formed, one on each
' Either arbitrarily [see § 183] or as given by the conditions of the question. Gan".
^ The two perpendiculars and the four segments. Gang.
3 Square of the interval of two segments measured from the same extremity.
* In the figure, which is divided by the diagonal line, two triangles are contained : one on each
side of that line; and their perpendiculars, which fall one on each side of the diagonal, are thence
found. The ditference between two segments on the same side will be the interval between the
perpemlicula]^. It is taken as the upright of a triangle. Producing one perpendicular by the ad-
PLANE FIGURE.
n
side of the diagonal. Taking the diagonal for the base of each, and the two
other sides as given, the two perpendiculars and the several segments must
be found by the method beibre taught. See figure
viz. Perpendiculars 24 and 60. Segment of the base of the one part 45
and 32 ; of the other 32 and 45. Difference of the segments on the same
side (that is, so much of the base as is intercepted between the perpendicu-
lars) 13. Its square I69. Sum of the perpendiculars 84. Its square 7056.
Sum of the squares 7225. Square-root of the sum 85. It is the length of
the second diagonal.
So in every like instance.
183 — 184. Rule restricting the arbitrary assumption of a diagonal [a
stanza and a half:] The sum of the shortest pair of sides containing the dia-
gonal being taken as a base, and the remaining two as the legs [of a triangle,]
the perpendicular is to be found: and, in like manner, with the other diagonal.
The diagonal cannot by any means be longer than the corresponding base,
nor shorter than the perpendicular answering to the other. Adverting to
these limits an intelligent person may assume a diagonal.
For a quadrilateral, contracting as the opposite angles approach, becomes
a triangle ; wherein the sum of the least pair of sides about one angle is the
diiion of the other, the sum is made the side of the triangle. The second diagonal is hypotenuse.
A triangle is thus formed. See
From this is deduced, that the square-root of the sum of the squares of the upright and side
will be the second diagonal : and the rule is demonstrated. Gan.
In an equilateral tetragon, and in a trapezium of which the greatest side is the base and the least
is the summit, there is no interval between the perpendiculars; and the second diagonal is the
sura of the perpendiculars. Ibid.
78 LI'LAVATI'. Chapter VI.
base ; and the other two are taken as the legs. The perpendicular is found
in the manner before taught. Hence the shrinking diagonal cannot by any
means be less than the perpendicular ; nor the other be greater than the base.
It is so both ways. This, even though it were not mentioned, would be
readily perceived by the intelligent student.
184. Rule to fiiid the area [half a stanza :] The sum of the areas of the
two triangles on either side of the diagonal is assuredly' the area in this
figure.
In the figure last specified, the areas of the two triangles are 924 and
2310. The sum of which is 3234; the area of the tetragon.
185 — 186. Rule'' [two stanzas:] Making the difference between the
base and summit of a [trapezoid, or] quadrilateral that has equal perpendicu-
lars, the base [of a triangle], and the sides [its] legs, the segments of it and
the length of the perpendicular are to be found as for a triangle. From the
base of the trapezoid subtracting the segment ; and adding the square of the
remainder to the square of the perpendicular, the square-root of the sum will
be the diagonal.'
In a [trapezoid, or] quadrangle that has equal perpendiculars, the sum of
the base and least flank is greater than the aggregate of the summit and
other flank.
' It is the true and correct area, contrasted with the gross or inexact area of former writers.
Gajj'. and SuR.
* To find definite diagonals, when neither is given; nor the perpendicular ; but the condition
that the perpendiculars be equal ; which is a suflRcient limitation of the problem.
^ In a quadrilateral figure having equal perpendiculars, the intermediate portion between the
extreme perpendiculars being taken away, there remain two rectangular triangles on the outer
side. Uniting them together, a triangle is formed, in which the flanks are legs, and the base less
the summit is the base. Hence the perpendicular in this triangle, found by the rule before taught
(§ 164.), is precisely the perpendicular of the tetragon; and the segments, which are found (§ l63),
lie between the perpendicular and the corresponding sides. The base of the tetragon, less either
of the segments, is the side of a rectangular triangle within the same tetragon ; and the perpen-
dicular is its upright : wherefore the square-root of the sum of their squares is the correspondent
diagonal : and, in like manner, with the other segment, the diagonal resting on the other perpen-
dicular is found. ' Gan.
PLANE FIGURE.
79
187 — 189- The sides measuring fifty-two and one less than forty ; the
summit equal to twenty-five, and the base sixty : this was given as an ex-
ample by former writers for a figure having unequal perpendiculars ; and
definite measures of the diagonals were stated, fifty-six and sixty-three.
Assign to it other diagonals ; and those particularly which appertain to it as
a figure with equal perpendiculars.
Statement :
Here assuming one diagonal sixty-three, 63, the other is found as before,
56. Or, putting thirty-two instead of fifty-six for a diagonal, the other, found
by the process before shown, comes out in two portions, both surds, 621 and
2700. The sum of the roots [as extracted by approximation] is the
second diagonal 76 ^. See figure of a triangle put to find the perpendi-
cular :
Here the segments are found f and i^ j and the perpendicular, the surd
; of which the root found by approximation is 38f|f . It is the equal
perpendicular of that tetragon.
Next the sum of the squares of the perpendicular and difference between
base and segment : Base of the tetragon, 60 : least segment f ; diflfereuce
^. Square of the difference a^^. Square of the perpendicular, which
was a surd root, ^■^^. Sum i^||i^ ; or, dividing by the denominator, 5049-
It is the square of one diagonal. So base 60 ; greater segment '--^ ; difi'er-
ence 4^. Its square •-^. Square of the surd perpendicular '-^.
Sum ~^; or, dividing by the denominator, 2176. It is the sum of the
squares of the perpendicular and difference between base and greater seg-
38016
23
80
LI'LAVATr.
Chapter VI.
inent; and is the square of the second diagonal. Extracting the roots of
these squares by approximation, the two diagonals come out 71 -jV and 46 -*^.
25
See
w\ /
\
CO ^\/
X,^
39'
\5?
J
25
34f\
60
In this tetragon with equal perpendiculars the short side 39 added to the
base 60, makes 99 : which is greater than the aggregate of the summit and
other flank, 77. Such is the limitation.
Thus, with the same sides, may be many various diagonals in the tetra-
gon. Yet though indeterminate, diagonals have been sought as determinate,
by Brahmegupta and others. Their rule is as follows.
190. Rule:' The sums of the products of the sides about both the dia-
gonals being divided by each other, multiply the quotients by the sum of
the products of opposite sides ; the square-roots of the results are the dia-
gonals in a trapezium.
The objection to this mode of finding the diagonals is its operoseness, as
I shall show by proposing a shorter method.
191 — 192. Rule [two stanzas] : The uprights and sides of two assumed
rectangular triangles," being multiplied by the reciprocal hypotenuses, be-
come sides [of a quadrilateral] : and in this manner is constituted a trape-
zium, in which the diagonals are deducible from the two triangles.' The
product of the uprights, added to the product of the sides, is one diagonal ;
the sum of the products of uprights and sides reciprocally multiplied, is the
" A couplet cited from Brahmegupta. 12. § 28.
* Assumed conformably with the rule contained in § 145. An objection, to which the cora-
roentator Gan'e's'a adverts, and which he endeavours to obviate, is that this shorter method re-
quires sagacity in the selection of assumed triangles; and that the longer method is adapted to all
capacities.
* This method of constructing a trapezium is taken from Brahmegupta. 12. § 38.
PLANE FIGURE.
81
other.' When this short method presented, why an operose one was prac-
tised by former writers, we know not."
' A trapezium is divided into four triangles by its intersecting diagonals ; and conversely, by
the junction of four triangles, a trapezium is constituted. For that purpose, four triangles are
assumed in this manner. Two triangles are first put in the mode directed (§ 145), the sides of
which are all rational. Such sides, multiplied by any assumed number, will constitute other rect-
angular triangles, of which also the sides will be rational. By the twofold multiplication of h}'-
potenuse, upright and side of one assumed triangle by the upright and side of the other, four tri-
angles are formed, such that turning and adapting them and placing the multiples of the hypote-
nuses for sides, this trapezium is composed.
25
4^5
3 5 15 20 15 36 60
Here the uprights and sides of the arbitrary triangles, reciprocally multiplied by the hypotenuses,
become sides of the quadrilateral: and hence the directions of the rule (§ 191). '
In a trapezium so constituted, it is apparent, that the one diagonal is composed of two parts ;
one the product of the uprights, the other the product of the sides of the arbitrary triangles. The
other diagonal consists of two parts, the products of the reciprocal multiplication of uprights and
sides. These two portions are the perpendiculars: for there is no interval between the points of
intersection. This holds, provided the shortest side be the summit ; the longest, the base ; and the
rest, the flanks. But, if the component triangles be otherwise adapted, the summit and a flank
change places. See
.39
Here the two portions of the first diagonal, as above found (viz. 48 and 13) do not face ; but are
separated by an interval, which is equal to the diflerence between the two portions of the other dia-
gonal (36 and 20) viz. l6. It is the difference of two segments on the same side, found by a pre-
ceding rule (§181—182); and is the interval between the intersections of the perpendiculars; and
is taken for the upright of a triangle, as already explained (§ 181, note) : the sum of the two por-
tions of diagonal equal to the two perpendiculars is made the side. The square-root of the sura of
the squares of such upright and side is equal to the product of the hypotenuses (13 and 5): where-
fore the author adds " if the summit and flank change places, the first* diagonal will be the pro-
duct of the hypotenuses."
From the demonstration of Brahmegxjpta's rule (Arithm. of Braum. § 28) may be deduced
• So Ibe MSS. But BniscAttA's teit exhibits second.
M
8S
LI'LA'VATI'.
Chapter VI.
Assuming two rectangular triangles, *{X ^^ A Multiply the upright
3 5
and side of one by the hypotenuse of the other : the greatest of the pro<lucts
is taken for the base ; the least for the summit ; and the other two for the
flanks. See ^^3^
I ^''^
39/ /V \52
Here, with much labor [by the former method] the diagonals are found
63 and SQ.
With the same pair of rectangular triangles, the products of uprights and
sides reciprocally multiplied are 36 and 20 : the sum of which is one dia-
grounds of a succinct proof, that the diagonal is found by multiplication of the hj'potenuses, when
the summit is not the least side. For, if the two derivative triangles be fitted together by bringing
the hypotenuses in contact, the trapezium is such as is produced by the transposition of the sura*
mit and a flank, and the diagonal is the product of the hypotenuses of the generating triangles.
<Jah'. 48 15
20
36
^J^'"^
\39
\\
/jb
36
20
60 48 15
» In like manner, for the tetragon before instanced (§ 178), to find the diagonals, a pair of rec-
tangular triangles is put
4^^
15
\1' Proceeding as directed, the diagonals come out 77 and
3 3
84. In the figure instanced, a transposition of the flank and summit takes place
_40
75 75
wherefore the product of the hypotenuse of the two rectangular triangles will be the second dia-
gonal : and they thus come out "Jt and 85. Gan.
PLANE FIGURE.
8S
gonal, 56. The products of uprights multiplied together, and sides taken
into each other, are 48 and 15 : their sum is the other diagonal, 63. Thus
they are found with ease.
■' But if the summit and flank change places, and the figure be stated ac-
cordingly, the second diagonal will be the product of the hypotenuses of the
two rectangular triangles : viz. 65. See
193 — 194. Example.* In a figure, in which the base is three hundred,
the summit a hundred and twenty-five, the flanks two hundred and sixty
and one hundred and ninety-five, one diagonal two hundred and eighty and
the other three hundred and fifteen, and the perpendiculars a hundred and
eighty-nine and two hundred and twenty -four ; what are the portions of the
perpendiculars and diagonals below the intersections of them? and the per-
pendicular let fall from the intersection of the diagonals ; with the segments
answering to it ? and the perpendicular of the needle formed by the pro-
longation of the flanks until they meet ? as well as the segments correspond-
ing to it ; and the measure of both the needle's sides ? All this declare, ma-
thematician, if thou be thoroughly skilled in this [science of]'' plane figure.
Statement ;
:V2S-^
195;
Length of the base 300. Summit 1 25.
Flanks 260 and 195. Diagonals 280
and 315. Perpendiculars 189 and
224r.
ff>48S' 300 j; 132
^-48^
• Having thus, from § 173 to this place, shown the method of finding the area, &c. in the four-
teen sorti of quadrilaterals, the author now exhibits another trapezium, proposing questions con-
cerning segments produced by intersections. — Gan. The author proposes a question in the form
of an example. — Gang. For the instruction of the pupil, he exhibits the figure called (suchi) a
needle. Manor.
The problem is taken from Brahmegupta with a slight variation; and this example differs
from his only in the scale, his numbers being here reduced to fifths. Arithm. of Brahm. § 32.
* Manorunjana.
m2
84 LI'LAVATI'. Chapter VI.
195 — 196. Rule (two stanzas): The interval between the perpendicular
and its correspondent flank is termed the sand'hi' or link of that perpendicu-
lar. The base, less the link or segment, is called the pii'ha or complement of
the same. The link or segment contiguous to that portion [of perpendicular
or diagonal] which is sought, is twice set down. Multiplied by the other
perpendicular in one instance, and by the diagonal in the other, and divided
[in both instances] by the complement belonging to the other [perpendicu-
lar], the quotients will be the lower portions of the perpendicular and dia-
gonal below the intersection.
Statement: Perpendicular 189. Flank contiguous to it 195. Segment
intercepted between them (found by § 134) 48. It is the link. The second
segment (found by § 195) is 2.52, and is called the complement.
In like manner the second perpendicular 224. The flank contiguous to
it 260. Interval between them, being the segment called link, 132. Com-
plement 168.
Now to find the lower portion of the first perpendicular 189. Its link,
separately multiplied by the other perpendicular 224 and by the diagonal
280, and divided by the other complement I68, gives quotients 64 the lower
portion of the perpendicular, and 80 the lower portion of the diagonal.
So for the second perpendicular 224, its link 132, severally multiplied by
the other perpendicular 189 and by the diagonal 315, and divided by the
other complement 252, gives 99 for the lower portion of the perpendicular
and 165 for that of the diagonal.
197. Rule to find the perpendicular below the intersection of the diago-
nals : The perpendiculars, multiplied by the base and divided by the re-
spective complements, are the erect poles : from which the perpendicular
let fall from the intersection of the diagonals, as also the segments of the
base, are to be found as before.*
Statement : Proceeding as directed, the erect poles are found 225 and 400.
Whence, by a former rule (§ 159), the perpendicular below the intersection
' Sand'hi union, alliance ; intervention, connecting link.
Pit'/ia lit. stool. Here the complement of the segment.
» By the rule I 159.
PLANE FIGURE. 85
of die diagonals is deduced, 144; and the segments of the base 108 and 192.
See figure
2251^
400
198 — 200. Rule to find the perpendicular of the needleS its legs and the
segments of its base [three stanzas] : The proper link, multiplied by the
other perpendicular and divided by its own, is termed tiie mean;^ and the
sum of this and the opposite link is called the divisor. Those two quanti-
ties, namely, the mean and the opposite link, being multiplied by the base
and divided by that divisor, will be the respective segments of the needle's
base. The other perpendicular, multiplied by the base and divided by the
divisor, will be the perpendicular of the needle. The flanks, multiplied by
the perpendicular of the needle and divided by their respective perpendicu-
lars, will be the legs of the needle.'^ Thus may the subdivision of a
' Such'i, needle; the triangle formed by the flanks of the trapezium produced until they meet.
SantTAi. See preceding note.
Soma, mean ; a fourth proportional to the two perpendiculars and the link or segment.
Jiara, divisor ; the sum of such fourth proportional and the other link or segment.
' The needle, or figure resulting from the prolongation of the flanks of the trapezium, is a tri-
angle, of which the sides are those prolonged flanks; and the base, the same with the base of the
trapezium ; and the perpendicular, the perpendicular of the needle : to find which, another similar
and interior triangle is formed, in which the flank of the trapezium is one side, and a line drawn
from its extremity parallel to the other leg of the needle is the second side : the perpendicular [of
the trapezium] is peqiendicular [of this interior triangle] ; the link is one segment of the base ; and
the mean, as it is called, is the other. See
260 or this 195,
260
<o it*
Here to find the segment denominated the mean. In proportion as the opposite perpendicular is
less or greater than the proper perpendicular, so is the segment termed the mean less or greater
86 LI'LA'VATr. Chapter VI.
plane figure be conducted by the intelligent, by means of the rule of
three.'
Here the perpendicular being 224, its link is 132. This, multiplied by
the other perpendicular, viz. 189, and divided by its own, viz. 224, gives
the mean as it is named ; ^. The sum of this and the other link 48 is
the divisor, as it is called, '-^. The mean and other link taken into the
base, being divided by this divisor, give the segments of the needle's base
^Y and '"Yp. The other perpendicular 189, multiplied by the base and
divided by the same divisor, yields the perpendicular of the needle ^y.
The sides 195 and 260, multiplied by the needle's perpendicular and divided
by their own perpendiculars respectively, viz. 189 and 224, give the legs
of the needle, which are the sides of the trapezium produced : *-^ and
tff . See
Thus, in all instances, under this head, taking the divisor for the argu-
ment, and making the multiplicand or multiplicator, as the case may be, the
fruit or requisition, the rule of three is to be inferred by the intelligent ma-
thematician.
than that called link : for, according as the side contiguous to the perpendicular is greater or less,
so is the parallel side also greater or less ; and so likewise is the segment contiguous thereto. Hence
this proportion with the opposite perpendicular : ' If the proper perpendicular have this its segment,
what has the opposite perpendicular ?' The proportional resulting is the other segment termed the
mean in the constructed triangle : and the sum of that and of the other segment called the opposite
link will be the base of the constituted triangle. It is denominated the divisor. To find the perpen-
dicular of the needle and the corresponding segments of its base accordingly, the proportion is this :
' If for this base these be the segments, what are they for the needle's base, which is equal to the
entire base ?' And, ' for that base, if this be the perpendicular, what is the perpendicular for the
needle's base, which is equal to the whole base?' and to find the legs of the needle, ' if the hypote-
nuse answering to an upright equal to the perpendicular be the side contiguous to it, what is the
hypotenuse answering to an upright equal to the perpendicular of the needle f In like manner,
the other leg is deduced from the other perpendicular. Gan.
' From one part of a figure given, another member of it is deduced by the intelligent, through
the rule of proportion. Sua.
PLANE FIGURE. tf
201. Rule:* When the diameter of a circle' is multiplied by three
thousand nine hundred and twenty-seven and divided by twelve hundred
and fifty, the quotient is the near* circumference : or multiplied by twenty-
two and divided by seven, it is the gross circumference adapted to prac-
tice.*
202. Example. Where the measure of the diameter is seven, friend, tell
the measure of the circumference : and where the circumference is twenty-
two, find the diameter.
' To deduce the circumference of a circle from its diameter, and the diameter from the circum-
ference. Gan.
* Vriita, vartula, a circle.
Vyasa, rishcambha, visMti, vistira, the breadth or diameter of a circle.
Parld'hi, pariddka, vrltti, nemi (and other synonyma of the felloe of a wheel), the circumference
or compass of a circle.
' Sucshma, delicate or fine; nearly precise; contrasted w'nh st'hula, gross, or somewhat less
exact, but sufficient for common purposes. — Gang. Su'r.
Brahmegupta puts the ratio of the circumference to the diameter as three to one for the gross
value, and takes the root of ten times the square of the diameter for the neat value of the circum-
ference. See Arithm. of Brahm. §40. Also Srid'hara's Ga«'. «(Jr.
♦ As the diameter increases or diminishes, so does the circumference increase or diminish :
therefore to find the one from the other, make proportion, as the diameter of a known circle to
the known circumference, so is the given diameter to the circumference sought : and conversely,
as the circumference to the diameter, so is the given circumference to the diameter sought.
Further: the semidiameter is equal to the side of an equilateral hexagon within the circle: as
will be shown. From this the side of an equilateral dodecagon may be found in this manner :
the semidiameter being hypotenuse, and half the side of the hexagon, the side ; the square-root
of the difference of their squares is the upright : subtracting which from the semidiameter the re-
mainder is the arrow [or versed sine]. Again, this arrow being the upright, and the half side of
the hexagon, a side ; the square-root of the sum of their squares is the side of the dodecagon. See
£^
From which, in like manner, may be found the side of a polygon with twenty-four sides : and so
on, doubling the number of sides in the polygon, until the side be near to the arc. The sum of
such sides will be the circumference of the circle nearly. Thus, the diameter being a hundred,
the side of the dodecagon is the surd 673 ; and that of a polygon of three hundred and eighty-four
sides is nearly equal to the arc. By computation it comes out the surd 98683. Now the pro-
portion, if to the square of the diameter put at a hundred, viz. 10000, this be the circumference,
viz, the surd, 98683, then to the square of the assumed diameter twelve hundred and fifty, viz.
1562500, what will be the circumference? Answer: the root 3927 without remainder. Gan.
.•
88
LI'LAVATI'.
Chapter VI.
Statement :
Answer : Circumference 2 1 \tH, or gross cir-
cumtcrcDce 22.
Statement :
Reversing multiplier and divisor, the diameter
comes out 7 -ji^j or gross diameter 7.
203. Rule : In a circle, a quarter of the diameter multiplied by the
circumference is the area. That multiplied by four' is the net all around
the ball." This content of the surface of the sphere, multiplied by the
diameter and divided by six is the precise solid, termed cubic, content
within the sphere.'
204. Example. Intelligent friend, if thou know well the spotless
Lildvati, say what is the area of a circle, the diameter of which is measured
by seven ? and the surface of a globe, or area like a net upon a ball, the
diameter being seven ? and the solid content within the same sphere ?
' Or rejecting equal multiplier and divisor, the circumference multiplied by the diameter is the
surface. Gan.
* Prishia-phala, superficial content : compared to the net formed by the string, with which
cloth is tied to make a playing ball.
G'hana-phala, solid content: compared to a cube, and denominated from it cubic.
' Dividing the circle into two equal parts, cut the content of each into any number of equal an-
gular spaces, and expand it so that the circumference become a straight line. See
S2 22
Then let the two portions approach so as the sharp angular spaces of the one may enter into
the similar intermediate vacant spaces of the other : thus constituting an oblong, of which
the semi-diameter is one side and half the circumference the other. See y]\[\[y|\liKUM
22 or 21 jfjl
The product of their multiplication is the area. Half by half is a quarter. Therefore a quarter
of the diameter by the circumference is equal to the area.
. See in the GolM'hy&ya (spherics) of the Sidd'h/inta-siromani, a demonstration of the rule, that
the surface of the sphere is four times the area of the great circle, or equal to the circumference
multiplied by the diameter.
••
PLANE FIGURE. $^.
Answer : Area of the circle 38 f^H- Super-
Statement: [ — - — ) ficial content of the sphere 153 J-iJ-f. Solid con-
tent of the sphere 179 ifH-
205 — 206. Rule : a stanza and a half. The square of the diameter being
multiplied by three thousand nine hundred and twenty-seven, and divided
by five thousand, the quotient is the nearly precise area ; or multiplied by
eleven and divided by fourteen,' it is the gross area adapted to common
practice. Half the cube of the diameter, with its twenty-first part added to
it,*" is the solid content of the sphere.
The area of the circle, nearly precise, comes out as before 38 ^~, or
gross area 38 ^. Gross solid content 179 !•
206 — 207- Rule :' a stanza and a half. The simi and difference of the
chord and diameter being multiplied together, and the square-root of the
product being subtracted from the diameter, half the remainder is the arrow.*
To demonstrate the rule for the solid content of the sphere : suppose the sphere divided into
as many little pyramids, or long needles with an acute tip and square base,* as is the number by
which the surface is measured ; and in length [height] equal to half the diameter of the sphere :
the base of each pyramid is an unit of the scale by which the dimensions of the surface are reckon-
ed : and, the altitude being a semidiameter. one-third of the product of their multiplication is
the content: for a needle-shaped excavation is one-third of a regular equilateral excavation, aa
■will be shown [§ 221]. Therefore [unit taken into] a sixth part of the diameter is the content of
one such pyramidical portion : and that multiplied by the surface gives the solid content of tha
sphere. Gan.
1 Multiplied by 22, and divided by (7 X 4) 28 ; or abridged by reduction to least terms, \^.
See Gas. &c.
* Multiplied by 22, and divided by (7x6) 42 ; or multiplied by 11 and divided by 21. Then
21:11 ::2:ff or 1+-^. See Gak. &c.
' In a circle cut by a right line, to find the chord, arrow, &c. That is, either the chord, the
arrow, or the diameter, being unknown, and the other two given, to find the one from the others,
Gan. Su'r.
* A portion of the circumference is a bow. The right line between its extremities, like tho
string of a bow, is its chord. The line between them is the arrow, as resembling one set on a bow.
Gai/. Si/r.
Dhanush, chtipa and other synonyma of bow ; an arc or portion of the circumference of a circle.
J'v^, jy^, jyacA, guiia, maurvi and other synonyma of bow-string ; the chord of an are.
Sara, uhu and other synonyma of arrow ; the versed sine.
* M&rd'han, base : lit. bead or sLull. Apa, tip or point : sbarp tumuut
N
90
LI'LAVATl'.
Chapter VI.
The diameter, less the arrow, being multiplied by the arrow, twice the
square-root of tlie product is the chord. The square of half the chord being
divided by the arrow, the quotient added to the arrow is pronounced' to be
the diameter of the circle."
208. Example. In a circle, of which the diameter is ten, the chord
being measured by six, say friend what is the arrow : and from the arrow
tell the chord; and from chord and arrow, the diameter.
1 By teachers : that is, it has been so declared by the ancients. Gav.
Brahmegupta divides the square of the chord by four times the versed sine. See Arithm. of
Braiim. § 41.
- On plane ground, with an arbitrary radius,» describe a circle ; and through the centre draw
a vertical diameter : then, on the circumference, at an arbitrary distance, make two marks; and
the line between them, within the circle, across the diameter, is the chord ; the portion of the
circumference below the chord is the arc : and the portion of the diameter between the chord and
arc is the arrow. Statement of a circle to e.\hibit these lines
Thus, if the arrow be unknown, to find it, a triangle is constituted within the circle ; where the
chord is side, a thread stretched from the tip of the chord over the diameter to the circumference
is [hypotenuse ; and a line uniting their extremities is] the upright. That is to be first found. The
square-root of the difference of the squares of the diameter and chord, which are hypotenuse and
side, is the upright. But the product of their sum and difference is the difference of their squares :
the root of which is the upright, and is measured on the vertical diameter. Thus the sum of the
two portions of the diameter is equal to the diameter. Now, under the rule of concurrence (| 55),
the less portion only being required, the difference is subtracted from the diameter; and the re-
mainder being halved is the arrow.
To deduce the chord from the arrow: another triangle is constituted within the circle; wherein
the semidiameter less the arrow is the upright, the semidiameter is hypotenuse ; and the square-
root of the differences of these squares will be the half of the chord ; and this doubled is the
chord.
Now to find the diameter. The root of the difference of the squares of hypotenuse and upright
before gave half the chord : now the square of this will be the difference of the squares of.hy-
potenuse and upright. That being divided by the arrow and added to it, the result is the
diameter. Sur.
The following rule for finding the arc is cited by Gan'i^sa from Aryabiiatta : " Si.\ times the
square of the arrow being added to the square of the chord, the square-root of the sum is the arc."
* Carcata; compass; lit. a crab; meaning the radiiu.
Cindra ; centre.
PLANE FIGURE.
91
Statement : Diameter 10. When the chord is 6, the lengtli of the arrow-
comes out 1. See
(D
Or, arrow 1. The chord is founds. Or from the chord and arrow the
diameter is deduced 10.
209—211. Rule:' three stanzas. By 103923, 84853, 70534, 60000,
52055, 45922, or 41031, multiply the diameter of the circle, and divide the
respective products by 120000; the quotients are severally, in their order,
the sides of polygons, from the triangle to the enneagon, [inscribed] within
the circle.*
* To find the sides of regular inscribed polygons. Sua. Gan.
* Divide the circumference by the number of sides of the polygon, and find the chord of the
arc which is the quotient. For this purpose one commentator (Su'r.) refers to the subsequent
rule (§ 213) in this treatise; and another (Gan.) to the rule, in the author's astronomical work,
(Sidd'hinta) for finding chords.
Or the demonstration, says Gan'e's'a, may be otherwise given. Describe a circle with any
radius* at pleasure, divide it into three equal parts and mark the points; and from those points,
with the same radius, describe three circles, which will be equal in circumference to the first
circle ; and it is thus manifest, that the side of the regular hexagon within the circle is half a
diameter. See
The side of a triangle [inscribed] within a circle is the upright ; the diameter is hypotenuse and
the side of the hexagon is side of the rectangular triangle. See the same figure. Therefore the
square-root of the difference of the squares of the semidiameter and diameter is the side of the equi-
lateral [inscribed] triangle : viz. for the proposed diameter (120000) 103923.
The side of a regular tetragon is hypotenuse, the semidiameter is upright, and side. See
Wherefore the square-root of twice the square of the semidiameter is the side of the
[inscribed] tetragon : viz. for the diameter assumed, 84853.
The side of the regular octagon is hypotenuse, half the side of the tetragon is upright, and the
difference between that and the semidiameter is the side. See
Wherefore the square-root of the sum of the squares of the half the side of the tetragon and the
semidiameter less the half side of the tetragon is the side of the regular [inscribed] octagon : viz.
for the diameter as put, 45922.
* Carcttta. See above,
N 2
9i
LI'LAVATI'.
Chapter VI.
212. Example. Within a circle, of which the diameter is two thousand,
tell me severally the sides of the inscribed equilateral triangle and other
polygons.
The proof of the sides of the regular pentagon, heptagon and euneagon cannot be shown in a
timilar manner. Gan.
First to find the side of a triangle inscribed within the circle, describe with a radius* equal to
the proposed semidiameter, a circle; and draw a vertical diameter line through its centre. Then
dividing the circumference into three equal parts, draw a triangular figure and another opposite
to it; let two other diameters join the summits [angles] of those triangles. Thus there are six
angles within the circle; and the interval between each pair of angles is equal to a semidiameter:
for the diameter, which is in contact with two sides of a quadrilateral within the hexagon, is, from
the centre of the circle to the side, a quarter of a diameter above the centre and just so muck
below it; and the sum of two quarters is half a diameter.
Now the length of a chord between an extremity of a diameter and an extremity of a side of thff
triangle, is equal to a semidiameter. It is a side of a rectangular triangle, of which the diameter
is hypotenuse, and the square-root of the difference of their squares is the upright and is the
measure of the side of the inscribed triangle. Ex. Diameter 120000. Side 60OOO. Difference of
their squares 10800000000. Its square-root 103923.
Or a hexagon being described within the circle as before, and three diameters being drawn
through the centre to the six angles, three equilateral quadrangular figures are constituted, where-
in the four sides are equal to semidiameters : the short diagonal too is equal to a semidiameter ;
and the long diagonal is equal to the side of the inscribed triangle : and that is unknown. To find
it, put the less diagonal equal to the semidiameter and proceeding as directed by the rule (§ IS 1-2),
the greater diagonal is found, and is the side of the inscribed triangle. Example : assumed dia-
gonal 60000. Its square 36OOOOOOOO, subtracted from four times the square of the side
14400000000, leaves 10800000000. Its square-root is the greater diagonal 103923; and is the
tide of the inscribed triangle.
The method of finding the side of the triangle and of the hexagon has been thus shown. That
of the inscribed tetragon is next propounded. Describing a circle as before, draw through the
centre a diameter east and west and one north and south : and four lines are to be then drawn in
the manner of chords, uniting their extremities. Thus a tetragon is inscribed in
the circle. In each quadrant, another rectangular triangle is formed; where-
in a semidiameter is side, and a semidiameter also upright; and the square-root
of ^he sum of their squares will be the side of the tetragon. For example, in
the proposed instance, side 6OOOO, upright 6OOOO. Sum of their squares 7200000000. Its square-
root 84853.
The side of the pentagon is the square-roof of five limes the square of the radius less the radius.t
• Careata ; opening of the compasses. See above,
t Tryi/d; sine of three signs.
I
PLANE FIGURE. 93
Statement :
Answer: Side of the triangle 1732 ^VJ of the tetragon 1414-^-; of the
Or describing a circle as before, and dividing it into five equal parts, construct a pentagon within
the circle. Draw aline between the extremities of two sides at pleasure; and two figures are
thus formed; one of which is a trapezium, and the other a triangle: and the line drawn is the
common base of both. Assume that chord arbitrarily : its arrow, found as directed,
will be the perpendicular. Thus, in the same triangle, two rectangular tri-
angles are constituted ; in which half the base is the side, the perpendicular is up-
right, and the square-root of the sum of their squares is hypotenuse, and is the
side of the pentagon. Example : putting the length of the arbitrary chord which is
the base of the two figures, at a value near to the diameter, viz. 114140, the arrow comes out by
the rule (§ 206) 41433 ; and the side of the pentagon is thence deduced 70534.
The side of the hexagon is half the diameter, as before shown.
For the heptagon, describe a circle as before, and within it a heptagon ; draw a line between
the extremities of two sides at pleasure, and three lines through the centre to the angles indicated
by those sides : an unequal quadrilateral is thus formed : of which the two greater sides, as well
as the least diagonal, are equal to a semidiameter. Assume the value of the greater diagonal ar-
bitrarily : it is the chord of the arc encompassing two sides. Hence finding the arrow in the man-
ner directed, it is the side of a small rectangular triangle, in which half the base or chord is the
upright; whence the hypotenuse or side of the heptagon is deducible.
Ex. Putting 93804 for the chord; the arrow inferred from it is 22579; and the
tide of the heptagon 52055.
Or by a preceding rule (§ 181) the short diagonal, equal to a semidiameter, is the base of the
two triangles on either side of it. The perpendicular thence deduced (§ l63 — 164) being doubled
is the greater diagonal.
To demonstrate the side of the octagon : describe a circle as before and two diameter lines, di-
viding the circle into four parts. Then draw two sides in each of those parts; and eight angles are
thus delineated. The line between the extremities of two sides, in form of a chord, is the side of
an inscribed tetragon. The line from the center of the circle to the corner of the side is equal to
half the diameter. Thus an unequal quadrilateral is constituted ; which is divided by the line
across it, forming two triangles, in which one side is a semidiameter and the base also is equal to
a semidiameter; and half the side of the inscribed tetragon is the perpendicular : whence the other
tide is to be inferred. ,^^[^^ I' comes out 45922.
Next the proof of the side of the nonagon is shown. A circle being described as before, in-
94 ll'LA'VATl'. Chapter VI.
pentagon 1175-^^; of the hexagon 1000; of the heptagon 867 -^.j; of the
octagon 765^; of the nonagon 683-H^. See
From variously assumed diameters, other chords are deducible; as will be
shown by us under the head of construction of sines, in the treatise on
spherics.
The following rule teaches a short method of finding the gross chords.
213. Rule : The circumference less the arc being multiplied by the arc,
the product is termed first.' From the quarter of the square of the circum-
ference multiplied by five, subtract that first product : by the remainder
divide the first product taken into four times the diameter : the quotient
will be the chord."
scribe a triangle in it. Thus the circle is divided into three parts. Three equal chords being drawn
in each of those portions, an enneagon is thus inscribed in the circle : and three oblongs are forraed
within the same ; of which the base is equal to the side of the inscribed triangle. Two perpendi-
culars being drawn in the oblong, it is divided into three portions, the first and last of which are
triangles ; and the intermediate one is a tetragon. The base in each of them is a third part of the
side of the inscribed triangle. It is the upright of a reclangular triangle; the perpendicular is its
side ; and the square-root of the sum of their squares is hypotenuse, and is the side of the enneagon.
To find the perpendicular, put an assumed chord equal to half the chord of the [inscribed] tetra-
gon ; find its arrow in the manner directed ; and subtract that from the arrow of the chord of the
[inscribed] triangle : the remainder is the perpendicular. Thus the perpendicular comes out
21989 : it is the side of a rectangular triangle. The third part of the inscribed triangle is 34641 :
it is the upright. The square-root of the sum of their squares is 41031 : and is the side of the
inscribed enneagon. Thus all is congruous. Su'r.
1 Frat'hama, <jdt/a, first [product].
* This, according to the remark of the commentators, is merely a rough mode of calculation,
giving the gross, not the near, nor precise, chords. The rule appears from their explanations of
the principle of it, to be grounded on considering the circle as converted into a rectangular
triangle, in which the proposed arc is a side, its complement to the semicircle is the up-
right, and the other semicircle is hypotenuse. The difference between the squares of such up"
right and hypotenuse is the square of the arc and is the^rst product in the rule. When the pro-
PLANE FIGURE. 95
214. Example. Where the semidiameter is a hundred and twenty, and
the arc of the circle is measured by an eighteenth multiplied by one and so
forth [up to nine/] tell quickly the chords of those arcs.
Statement : Diameter 240. Here the circumference is 754 [nearly].
Arcs being taken, multiples of an eighteenth thereof, the chords are to be
sought.
Or for the sake of facility, abridging both circumference and arcs by the
eighteenth part of the circumference, the same chords are found. Thus,
circumference 18. Arcs ]. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. S. 9- Proceeding as directed, the
chords come out 42. 82. 120. 154. 184. 208. 226. 236. 240. See
In like manner, with other diameters [chords of assigned arcs may be
found.]*
215. Rule :' The square of the circumference is multiplied by a quarter
of the chord and by five, and divided by the chord added to four times the
diameter; the quotient being subtracted from a quarter of the square of the
circumference, the square-root of the remainder, taken from the half of the
circumference, will leave the arc*
posed arc is a semicircle, the chord is a niaxinium : and so is the'first product ; and this is equal to
the square of the semicircumference or quarter of the square of the circumference. Then, as this
maximum is to the greatest chord, or four times the one to four times the other, so is the first
product for the proposed arc to the chord of that arc. This proportion, however, is modified, by
adding to the first term of it the square of the complement of the proposed arc to the semicircle.
1 Up to nine, or half the number of arcs: for the chords of the eighth and tenth will be the
same ; and so will those of the seventh and eleventh : and so forth. Gan.
« Gang. &c.
' To find the arc from the chord given.
♦ This is analogous to the preceding rule. The complement of the arc is found by a rough ap-
proximation.
96 LI'LA'VATI'. Chapter VI.
216. Example. From the chords, which have been here found, now
tell the length of the arcs, if, mathematician, thou have skill in computing
the relation of arc and chord.* .
Statement: Chords 42. 82. 120. 154. 184. 208. 226. 236. 240.
Circumference abridged 18. Arcs thence found 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7- 8. 9-
They must be multiplied by the eighteenth part of the circumference.*
• To find the area of the bow or segment of a circle, the following rule is given in Vishx'c*
Ganila-sdra, as cited by Ganga'diiara; and the like rule is taught by Ce's'ava quoted by his son
Gan'e's'a : ' The arrow being multiplied by half the sum of the chord and arrow, and a twentieth
part of the product being added, the sum is the area of the segment.' Sri'd'haua's rule, as cited
by Gan'es'a, is ' the square of the arrow multiplied by half the sum of the chord and arrow, being
multiplied by ten and divided by nine, the square-ruot of the product is the area of the bow.
jGakes'a adds : ' the chord and arrow being given, find the diameter; and from this the circum-
ference; and thence tlie arc. Then from the extremities of the arc draw lines to the centre of
the circle. Find the area of the sector* by multiplying half the arc by the semidiameter; and the
area of the triangle by taking half the chord into the semidiameter less the arrow. Subtracting
the area of the triangle from the area of the sector, the difference is the area of the segment.' The
Manoranjana gives a similar rule : but finds the area of the sector by the proportion ' as the whole
rircumference is to the whole area, so is the proposed arc to the area of the sector.'
* The commentator Su'ryada'sa notices other figures omitted, as he thinks, by the author;
and Ganga'dhara quotes from the Ganita-s6ra of Vishnu an enumeration of them ; the most
material of which are specified in Srid'hara's Ganita-s&ra. They are reducible, however, ac-
cording to these authors, to the simple figures which have been treated of: and the principal ones
are, the Gaja-danta or elephant's tusk, which may be treated as a triangle. — Sri. Bdlendu,or cres-
cent, [a lunule or meniscus,] which may he considered as composed of two triangles. — Sei. Yaca
or barley-corn, [a convex lens,] treated as consisting either of two triangles or two bows, — Gang.
Nemi or felloe, considered as a quadrilateral. — Sui. and Su'r. ria/Va or thunderbolt, treated as
comprising two triangles. — Su'r. Or a quadrilateral with two bows or two trapezia. — Gang. Or
two quadrilaterals. — Sri. Panchacona or pentagon, composed of a triangle and a trapezium. —
Gang. Shddbhvja or hexagon, a quadrilateral and two triangles, or two quadrilaterals. — Gang.
5a/)/(Jira or heptagon, five triangles. — Gang. Besides Sanc'Aa or conch ; M/ifcian^aor great drum i
^nd several others.
• Vrltta-e'hwda, portion of a circle,
/
'^■^.
CHAPTER VII.
EXCAVATIONS' and CONTENT of SOLIDS.
217 — 218. Rule :* a couplet and a half. Taking the breadth in several
places,' let the sum of the measures be divided by the number of places :
the quotient is the mean measure.* So likewise with the length and depth.*
The area of the plane figure, multiplied by the depth, will be the number
of soHd cubits contained in the excavation.
219 — 220. Example: two stanzas. Where the length of the cavity,
owing to the slant of the sides, is measured by ten, eleven and twelve cu-
bits in three several places, its breadth by six, five and seven, and its depth
• Ohdta-vyavahdra. The author treats first of excavations ; secondly of stacks of bricks and the
like; thirdly of sawing of timber and cutting of stones; and fourthly of stores of grain; in as many
distinct chapters.
* For measuring an excavation, the sides of which are trapezia. Gan.
' Vist6ra, breadth.
Dairghya, length.
Bed' ha, bed'/iana, depth.
CMta, an excavation, or a cavity (garta), as a pond, well, or fountain, &c.
Sama-c'Adta, a cavity having the figure of a regular solid with equal sides : a parallelipipedon,
cylinder, &c.
Vishama-c'Mta, one, the sides of which are unequal: an irregular solid.
SItchi-c'hdta, an acute one : a pyramid or cone.
Sama-miti, mean measure.
G'hana-phala, g'hana-haita-sanc'ht/d, c'Mta-sanc'hy&, the content of the excavation ; or of a solid
alike in tigure.
♦ The greater the number of the places, the nearer will the mean measure be to to the truth,
and the more exact will be the consequent computation. Gan.
' The irregular solid is reduced to a regular one, to find its content. ,■ ^i' j,-jr Si/r.
O
\
98 LI'LA'VATI'. Chapter VII.
by two, four and three; tell me, friend, how many solid cubits are contained
in that excavation ?
Statement: 12 11 10 L. Here finding the mean measure, the
7 5 6 B. breadth is 6 cubits, the length 1 1, and
3 4 2D. the depth 3. See
ndtt
s»
11
Answer. The number of solid cubits is found 198.
221. Rule:* a couplet and a half The aggregate of the areas at
the top and at the bottom, and of that resulting from the sum [of the sides
of the summit and base], being divided by six, the quotient is the mean
area: that, multiplied by the depth, is the neat- content.^ A third part of the
content of the regular equal solid is the content of the acute one.*
222. Example. Tell the quantity of the excavation in a well, of which
the length and breadth are equal to twelve and ten cubits at its mouth, and
half as much at the bottom, and of which the depth, friend, is seven cubits.
12
Statement: Length 12. Breadth 10. Depth 7. |^^^ Sum of
the sides 18 and 15.
Area at the mouth 120; at the bottom 30; reckoned by the sum of the
aides 270. Total 420. Mean area 70. Solid content 490.
' To find the content of a prism, pyramid, cylinder and cone.
* Contrasted with the result of the preceding rule, which gave a gross or approximated measure.
' Half the sum of the breadth at the mouth and bottom is the mean breadth ; and half the
sum of the length at the mouth and bottom is the mean length : their product is the area at the
middle of the parallelipipedon. [Four times that is the product of the sums of the length and
breadth.] This, added to once the area at the mouth and once the area at the bottom, is six times
the mean area. Gak.
* As the bottom of the acute excavation is deep, by finding an area for it in the manner before
directed, the regular equal solid is produced: wherefore proportion is made ; if such be the con-
tent, assuming three places, what is the content taking one? Thus the content of the regular equal
lolid, divided by three, is that of the acute one. Sv'r.
EXCAVATIONS.
99
223. Example. In a quadrangular excavation equal to twelve cubits,
what is the content, if the depth be measured by nine ? and in a round one,
of which the diameter is ten and depth five ? and tell me separately, friend,
the content of both acute solids.
Statement :
Product of the side and upright 144 ; mul-
tiplied by the depth, is the exact content 1296.
Content of the acute solid 432.
Statement
Content nearly exact
of the acute solid
Or gross content [of the cylinder]
[of the cone] ^f .
1309
10
8750
7
\
mi ajj t.
; Hi ,u:
OS
CHAPTER VIII.
la^-WK^
stacks:
224 — 225. Rule :* a stanza and a half. The area of the plane figure [or
base] of the stack, multiplied by the height,' will be the solid content.
The content of the whole pile, being divided by that of one brick, the num-
ber of bricks is found. The height of the stack, divided by that of one brick,
gives the number of layers. So likewise with piles of stones.*
226 — 227- Example : two stanzas. The bricks of the pile being eighteen
fingers long, twelve broad and three high, and the stack being five cubits
broad, eight long, and three high, say what is the solid content of that pile?
and what the number of bricks ? and how many the layers ?
Statement ;
K
Bricks \, \,
Answer : Solid content of the brick -^ ;
bricks 2560. Number of layers 24.
So likewise in the case of a pile of stones.
of the stack 120. Number of
* Chiti-w/axah&ra.
* To find the solid content of a stack or pile of bricks, or of stones or other things of uniform
dimensions: also the number of bricks and of strata contained in the stack.
' Chiti : a pile or stack : an oblong with quadrangular sides.
Uchch'hraya, Uchch'hriti, Auchchya, height.
Stara, layer or stratum.
* The principle of the rule is obvious : being the extension of the preceding rule concerning the
content of excavations, to a solid pile; and the application of the rule of proportion. Gai/.
CHAPTER IX.
i 'i^^Hlr
S A W.'
228. Rule: two half stanzas.* Half the sum of the thickness at both
extremities, multipHed by the length in fingers ; and the product again mul-
tiplied by the number of sections of the timber, and divided by five hun-
dred and seventy-six,' will be the measure in cubits.
229. Example. Tell me quickly, friend, what will be the reckoning
in cubits, for a timber the thickness of which is twenty fingers at the root ;
and sixteen fingers at the tip, and the length a hundred fingers, and which
is cut by four sections.
__^ Half the sum of the thickness at
Statement: ( ^~ j^ii^ ^^^ff the two extremities 18, multi-
plied by the length, makes 1 800 ;
and by the sections, 7200; divided by 576, gives the quotient in cubits y.
230. Rule : half a stanza. But when the wood is cut across, the super-
ficial measure is found by the multiplication of the thickness and breadth,
in the mode above mentioned.*
' CracachiKycmaMra : determination of the reckoning concerning the saw (cracacha) or iron
instrument with a jagged edge for cutting wood. Sc'r.
* The concluding half of one stanza begun in the preceding rule (225), and the first half of
another stanza of like metre completed in the following rule (230).
' To reduce superficial fingers to superficial cubits.
♦ If the breadth be unequal, the mean breadth must be taken ; and so must the mean thickness,
as before directed, if that be unequal. Gan. Su'r.
102
LI'LAVATI'.
Chapter IX.
S31. Maxim, The price for the stack of bricks or the pile of stones, or
for excavation and sawing, is settled by the agreement of the workman, ac-
cording to the softness or hardness of the materials.*
232. Example. Tell me what will be the superficial measure in cubits,
for nine cross sections of a timber, of wliich the breadth is thirty-two fingers,
and thickness sixteen.
32
Statement :
16
Answer : 8 cubits.
' This is levelled at certain preceding writers, who have given rules for computing specific prices
or wages, as Arya-bhatta quoted by Gan'e's'a, and as Brahmegupta (see Arithm. of Brahm.
§ 49) ; particularly in the instance of sawyen' work, by varying the divisors according to the dif-
ference of the timber.
CHAPTER X.
MOUND' of GRAIN,
233. Rule. The tenth part of the circumference is equal to the depth
[height'] in the case of coarse grain ; the eleventh part, in that of fine ; and
the ninth, in the instance of bearded com.' A sixth of the circumference
being squared and multiplied by the depth [height], the product will be the
solid cubits :* and they are c'hdris of MagadhaJ
234. Example. Mathematician, tell me quickly how many charis are
* RAii-vyavah&ra determination of a mound, meaning of grain.
» Bed'ha depth. See § 217. Here it is the perpendicular from the top of the mound of corn t»
the ground. — Gan. It is the height in the middle from the ground to the summit of the mound
of grain. — Su'r.
' Anu, sucshma-d'h&nya, fine grain, as mustard seed, &c. — Gan. As Paspalum Kora, &c. —
Manor, As wheat, &c. — Su'r.
Ananu, st'h&la-d'hdnya, coarse grain, as chiches (Cicer arietinum). — Gan. and Sua. As wheat,
&c. — Manoranjana. Barley, &c. — Ch. onBRAiiM.
S&cin, auca-d'Mnya, bearded com, as rice, &c.
The coarser the grain, the higher the mound. The rule is founded on trial and experience;
and, for other sorts of grain, other proportions may be taken, as Pi or \.0\, or 12 times the
height, equal to the circumference. — Gan. and Su'r. The rule, as it is given in the text, is
taken from Brahuegupta. — Arithm.of Brahm. § 50.
* This is a rough calculation, in which the diameter is taken at one-third of the circumference.
The content may be found with greater precision by taking a more nearly correct proportion be-
tween the circumference and diameter. Gai/.
' See I 7. The proportion of the c'h&r't or other dry measure of any province to the solid cubit
being determined, a rule may be readily formed for computing the number of such measures in a
conical mound of grain. Gane's'a accordingly delivers rules by him devised for the c'h&ri of JVan-
iigr&ma and for that ol Dcvagiri: ' the circumference measured by the human cubit, squared and
102
LI'LA'VATI'.
Chapter IX.
231. Maxim. The price for the stack of bricks or the pile of stones, or
for excavation and sawing, is settled by the agreement of the workman, ac-
cording to the softness or hardness of the materials.'
232. Example. Tell me what will be the superficial measure in cubits,
for nine cross sections of a timber, of which the breadth is thirty -two fingers,
and thickness sixteen.
32
Statement :
16
Answer : 8 cubits.
' This is levelled at certain preceding writers, who have given rules for computing specific prices
or wages, as Arya-biiatta quoted by Gane's'a, and as BRAHMEOUPTA(see Arithm. of Brahm.
§ ^9) t particularly in the instance of sawyers' work, by varying the divisors according to the dif*
ference of the timber.
CHAPTER X.
MOUND' of GRAIN,
233. Rule. The tenth part of the circumference is equal to the depth
[height^] in the case of coarse grain ; the eleventh part, in that of fine ; and
the ninth, in the instance of bearded corn.' A sixth of the circumference
being squared and multiplied by the depth [height], the product will be the
solid cubits:* and they are chdris oi MagadhaJ
234. Example. Mathematician, tell me quickly how many c'hdris are
* RAii-vyavah&ra determination of a mound, meaning of grain.
» Bed'ha depth. See § 217- Here it is the perpendicular from the top of the mound of corn t*
the ground. — Gai/. It is the height in the middle from the ground to the summit of the mound
of grain. — Su'r.
' Atiu, sucshma-d'h&nya, fine grain, as mustard seed, &c. — Gan. As Paspalum Kora, &c. —
Manor, As wheat, &c. — Sue.
Ananu, st'h&lo'd'hdnya, coarse grain, as chiches (Cicer arietinum). — Gan. and Su'r. As wheat,
&c. — Manoranjana. Barley, &c. — Ch. on Brabm.
S&cin, iuca-d'Mni/a, bearded com, as rice, &c.
The coarser the grain, the higher the mound. The rule is founded on trial and experipnce ;
and, for other sorts of grain, other proportions may be taken, as 9i or 10^, or 12 times the
height, equal to the circumference. — Gan. and Su'r. The rule, as it is given in the text, is
taken from Braiimegupta. — Arithm.of Brahm. § 50.
* This is a rough calculation, in which the diameter is taken at one-third of the circumference.
The content may be found with greater precision by taking a more nearly correct proportion be-
tween the circumference and diameter. Gan.
' See § 7. The proportion of the c'Mri or other dry measure of any province to the solid cubit
being determined, a rule may be readily formed for computing the number of such measures in a
conical mound of grain. Gan'e'sa accordingly delivers rules by him devised for the c'hdri of xVaa-
digrdma and for that of Dhagiri: ' the circumference measured by the human cubit, squared and
104 LI'LAVATI'. Chapter X.
contained in a mound of coarse grain standing on even ground, the circum-
ference of which (mound) measures sixty cubits ? and separately say how
many in a Hke mound of fine grain and in one of bearded corn ?
Statement : ( \ Circumference 60. Height 6.
o
Answer: 600 c'A^^rf^ of coarse grain. But of fine grain, height ^, and
quantity thence deduced ^^. So, of bearded com, height y, and quan-
tity ^ charis.
235. Rule : In the case of a mound piled against the side of a wall, or
against the inside or outside of a comer of it, the product is to be sought
with the circumference multiplied by two, four, and one and a third; and is
to be divided by its own multiplier.'
236 — 237. Example : two stanzas. Tell me promptly, friend, the num-
ber of solid cubits contained in a mound of grain, which rests against the
side of a wall, and the circumference of which measures thirty cubits ; and
that contained in one piled in the inner corner and measuring fifteen cubits;
as also in one raised against the outer corner and measuring nine times five
cubits.
divided by sixteen, gives the chdn of Nandigr&tna ; and by sixty, that of Devagiri.'* He further
observes, that a vessel measuring a span every way contains a mana ; that one measured by a
cubit every way, taking the natural human cubit, contains eight matias ; and that the cubit, in-
tended by the text, is a measure in use with artisans, called in vulgar speech goj [or gaz\ ; and a
c'Mr't, equal to such a sulid cubit, will contain twenty-five matias and three quarters.
* Against the wall, the mound is half a cone ; in the inner corner, a quarter of one ; and
against the outer corner, three quarters. The circumference intended is a like portion of a cir-
cular base ; and the rule finds the content of a complete cone, and then divides it in the propor-
tion of the part. See Gan. &c.
* In tlie vernacolar dialect, Nmdigaon and Dfigir : the latter U better knovm by the name of Datiletabady which
the Emperor Mviiammcd conferred on it in the 14t)i century. The Hindus, however, have continued to it Its ancient
name of Divogiri, inonntuin of the gods. Nandigrdma, the town or village of Kandi (Siva's bull and vehicle), retains
the aniit|uc name ; and is situated about 65 miles west of Divagiri ; and is accordingly said by this commeatBlor in th»
colophon of bis work to be near that remarkable place.
MOUND OF GRAIN.
105
Twice the first-mentioned circum-
ference is 60. Four times the next
Statement : ( j^ g^ rpj^^ j^^^^ multiplied by one
and a third is likewise 60. With
these the product is alike 600. This, being divided by the respective mul-
tipliers, gives the several answers, 300, 150 and 450.\
' For coarse grain: but the product is looo fQ^ fine; and £""" 1 for bearded corn: and the
answers are ?"»". lAS-O, iM"; and ^2^", J-^as, lioo. Can. &c.
CHAPTER XL
SHADOW of a GNOMON.
238. Rule.^ The number five hundred and seventy-six being divided
by the difference of the squares of the differences of both shadows and of
the two hypotenuses/ and the quotient being added to one, the difference
of the hypotenuses is multiplied by the square-root of that sum ; and the
product being added to, and subtracted from, the difference of the shadows,
the moieties of the sum and difference are the shadows.*
' Clihiyi-vyavaMra : determination of shadow ; that is, measurement by means of a gnomon.
* The difference of the shadows, and difference of the hypotenuses being given, to find the length
of the shadows and hypotenuses. Sua.
This rule is the first in the chapter, according to all the commentators except Su'ryadasa, who
begins with the next, § 240 ; and places this after § 244.
' Ch'h&yi, bh6, prabMi, and other synonyma : shadow.
Sancu, nara, nrt; a gnomon. It is usually twelve fingers long.
Cania, hypotenuse of the triangle, of which the gnomon is the perpendicular, and the shadow
the base.
♦ The rule, as the author hints in the example, which follows, is founded on an algebraic so-
lution. It is given at length in the commentary of GAiiESA. The gnomon and shadow, with the
line which joins their extremities, constitute a rectangular triangle, in which the gnomon is the
upright, the shadow is the side, and the line joining their extremities the hypotenuse. In like
manner another such is constituted ; and joining their flanks, a triangle is formed. See
Herein the gnomon is the perpendicular; the two hypotenuses are the sides ; the two shadows are
the segments ; and the sum of these is the base. Put this equal toyaX; and to pursue the inves-
tigation, let the diflference of the shadows be given 11 ; and the difference of the hypotenuses 7-
I
SHADOW OF A GNOMON. 107
239- Example. The iugeuious man, who tells the shadows, of which
the difFerence is measured by nineteen, and the difference of hypotenuses by
thirteen, I take to be thoroughly acquainted with the whole of algebra as
well as arithmetic.
Statement: DifFerence of the shadows I9. Difference of hypotenuses
13. [Gnomon 12.]
Difference of their squares I92. By this divide 576: quotients. Add
one. Sum 4. Square-root 2. By which multiply the difference of hyjx)-
tenuses 13: product 26. Add it to, and subtract it from, the difference of
the shadows 19 ; and halve the sum and difference : the shadows are found
V and i.
Then, by the rule of concurrence (§ 55), the segments are ya ^ ru y and ya-^ ru y . The square
of the greater segment, added to the square of the perpendicular twelve, is the square of the
greater side : !/a I' ^ 3"* T 't^^- This is one side of an equation. The difterence of the squares
of the segments is equal to the difference of the squares of the sides ; as has been before shown
(§ 164, note). But the difference of squares is equal to the product of the sum and difference.
Sum ya 1 ; diff. ru 11 ; product i/a 11. It is the difference of the squares of the sides. Divided
by the difference of the simple quantities, the quotient is the sum ya y. The sum and difference
added together and halved give the greater side ya ^ ru ff . Its square is ya v ^J ya 1^/
ru ^^^. It is the second side of the equation. Reducing both to the same denomination and drop-
ping the denominator, the equation becomes _y« o 49 ^a 1078 r« 34153. Now, when equal sub-
ya V 121 ya 1078 ru 2401
traction is made, the residue [or remaining coefficient] of the square of the unknown is the dif-
ference of the squares of the differences of the shadows and hypotenuses. The residue of the
simple unknown term is nought. The absolute numbers on both sides being abridged by the
square of the difference of hypotenuses as common divisor, there remains on one side of the equation
the square of the difference of the hypotenuses, and on the other side the square of the difference
of the shadows added to five hundred and seventy-six. Subtraction of like quantities being made,
the residue of the absolute number is the difference of the squares of the differences of the hypote-
nuses and shadows added to five hundred and seventy-si.x. The remaining term involving the
square of the unknown, being divided by the coefficient of the same, gives unity. The remainder
of the absolute number being abridged by the common divisor, there results the number five hun-
dred and seventy-six divided by the difference of the squares of the differences of the shadows and
hypotenuses together with one. Its square-root is the root of the absolute number. But the abso-
lute number was previously abridged by the square of the difference of the hypotenuses : where-
fore the root must be multiplied by the difference of the hypotenuses. Hence the rule § 238. It
is the value oi yaxat-t&vat as found by the equation : and is the base. It is the sum of the shadows.
The difference of the shadows being added and subtracted, the moieties will be the shadows, by
the rule of concurrence (§ 55). Gan.
P 2
108
LI'LAVATI.
Chapter XL
Under the rule § 1 34, the gnomon being the upright, and the shadow the
side, the square-root of the sum of their squares is the hypotenuse ; viz. Y
and V'
240. Rule :' half a stanza. The gnomon, multiplied by the distance
of its foot from the foot of the light, and divided by the height of the torch's
flame less the gnomon, will be the shadow.*
241. Example. If the base between the gnomon and torch be three
cubits, and the elevation of the light, three cubits and a half, say quickly,
friend, how much will be the shadow of a gnomon, which measures twelve
fingers ?
Statement ;
Answer : Shadow 12 fingers.
242. Rule :' half a stanza. The gnomon being multiplied by the
distance between the light and it, and divided by the shadow ; and the
quotient being added to the gnomon ; the sum is the elevation of the torch.*
' The elevation of the light and [horizontal] distance of its foot from the foot of the gnomon
being given, to find the shadow. Gan.
^ As the height of the light increases, the shadow of the gnomon decreases ; and as the light is
lowered, the length of the shadow augments. Now a line drawn strait, in the direction
of the diagonal, from the light, meets the extremity of the gnomon's shadow. In like
manner, tailing off from the tip of the torch's flame a height equal to the gnomon's, and placing
the light there, a diagonal line drawn as before meets the base of the gnomon.
Thus the base between the foot of the gnomon and that of the light is the side of
the triangle, and the height of the light less the gnomon is the upright. Hence
the proportion : ' as the height of the torch less the gnomon, is to the distance of
its foot from that of the gnomon, so is the gnomon to the shadow.' Whence the
rule.
' To find the elevation of the torch ; the length of the shadow being given, and the [horizontal]
distance. Su'r.
♦ The demonstration proceeds on the proportion ' as the side measured by the shadow of the
gnomon is to an upright e(]ual to the gnomon, so is a base equal to tlie distance of the gnomon
from the light, to a proportional,' which is the elevation of the torch less the height of the gnomon.
Sua.
Su'r.
SHADOW OF A GNOMON.
109
243. Example. If the base between the torch and gnomon be three
cubits, and the shadow be equal to sixteen fingers, how much will be the
elevation of the torch ? And tell me what is the distance between the torch
and gnomon [if the elevation be given] ?
Statement :
Answer : Height of the torch V •
244. Rule :• half a stanza. The shadow, multiplied by the elevation
of the light less the gnomon and divided by the gnomon, will be the interval
between the gnomon and light.
Example, as before proposed (§ 243).
Answer: Distance 3 cubits.
245. Rule -.^ a stanza and a half. The length of a shadow multiplied
by the distance between the terminations of the shadows and divided by the
difference of the length of the shadows, will be the base. The product of
the base and the gnomon, divided by the length of the shadow, gives the
elevation of the torch's flame.'
In like manner is all this, which has been before declared, pervaded by
the rule of three with its variations,* as the universe is by the Deity.
' To find the [horizontal] distance ; the elevation of the torch and length of the shadow being
given. SuR. and Gan.
The gnomon being set up successively in two places, the distance between which is known,
and the length of the two shadows being given, to find the elevation of the light, and the base.
SuR. and Gan.
^ The rule is borrowed from Brahmegupta. See Arithm. of Brahm. § 54.
♦ The double rule of proportion, or rule of five or more quantities, &c. — Gan. The author
intimates, that the whole preceding system of computation, as well the rules contained under the
present head, as those before delivered, is founded on the rule of proportion. Gan.
flOO L FLAT ATI'. Chapter XI.
246. Example. The shadow of a gnomon measuring twelve fingers
being found to be eight, and that of the same placed on a spot two cubits
further in the same direction being measured twelve fingers, say, intelligent
mathematician, how much is the distance of the shadow^ from the torch, and
the height of the light, if thou be conversant with computation, as it is
termed, of shadow?
Here the interval between the termination
Statement : \\^ of the shadows is in fingers 52 ; and the
shadows are 8 and 12. The first of these,
viz. 8, multiplied by the interval 52, and di-
vided by the difference of the length of the shadows 4, gives the length of
the base 104. It is the distance between the foot of the torch and the tip
of the first shadow. So the length of the base to the tip of the second
shadow is 156.
The product of the base and gnomon, divided by the shadow, gives both
ways the same elevation of the light : viz. 6-^ cubits.
In like manner.]- As under the present head of measurement of shadow,
the solution is obtained by putting a proportion : viz. ' if so much of the
shadow, as is the excess of the secoiid above the first, give the base inter-
cepted between the tips of the shadows, -what will the first give ?' Tlie
distances of the terminations of the shadows from the foot of the torch are
in this manner severally found. Then a second proportion is put : ' if, the
shadow being the side, the gnomon be the upright ; then, the base being the
side, what will be the upright ?' The elevation of the torch is thus found :
and is both ways [that is, computed with either shadow,] alike.
So the whole sets of five or more terms are explained by twice putting
three terms and so forth.
As the being, who relieves the minds of his worshippers from suffering,
and who is the sole cause of the production of this universe, pervades the
' All the commentators appear to have read gnomon in thisplace; but one copy of the text
exhibits shadow as the reading: andtbis seems.to be coricct.
* Reference to the text: § 245.
SHADOW OF A GNOMON. ill
whole, and does so with his various manifestations, as worlds, paradises,*
mountains, rivers, gods, demons, men, trees," and cities ; so is all this collec-
tion of instructions for computations pervaded by the rule of three terms.
Then why has it been set forth by so many different [writers,^ with much
labour, and at great length] ? The answer is
247. Whatever is computed either in algebra or in this [arithmetic] by
means of a multiplier and a divisor, may be comprehended by the sagacious
learned as the rule of three terms. Yet has it been composed by wise in-
structors in miscellaneous and other manifold rules, teaching its easy varia-
tions, thinking thereby to increase the intelligence of such dull comprehen-
sions as ours.
' Bhuvana, vioMs ; heaven, earth, and the intermediate region. B/zarana, paradises, the several
abodes of Brahma' and the rc«t of the gods.
* Naga, either tree or mountain. The terra, however, is read in the text by none of the com-
mentators besides Gan'es'a.
3 As SriVhaea and the rest. — Mono. As Brahmegupta and others. — Gakg.
CHAPTER XII.
PULVERIZER}
248 — 252. Rule. In the first place, as preparatory to the investigation
' Cutlaca-vyavah&ra or cuttac&d'hy&ya determination of a grinding or pulverizing multiplier, or
quantity such, that a given number being multiplied by it, and the product added to a given
quantity, the sum (or, if the additive be negative, the difference) may be divisible by a given di-
visor without remainder.
See Vija-Ganita, chapter 2, from which this is borrowed, the contents being copied, (with some
variation of the order,) nearly word for word. For this, as well as the* following chapter 13, on
Combination, belongs to algebra rather than arithmetic ; according to the remark of the commen-
tator Gan'e's'a bhat'ta : and they are here introduced, as he observes, and treated without em-
ploying algebraic forms, to gratify such as are unacquainted with analysis.
The commentator begins by asking 'why this subject has been admitted into a treatise of arith-
metic, while a passage of Arya-bhat't'a expressly distinguishes it from both arithmetic and alge-
bra: " the multifarious doctrine of the planets, arithmetic, the pulverizer, (cuitaca) and analysis
(vija), and the rest of the science treating of seen* objects;" and Brahmegupta, at the begin-
ning of his chapter on Arithmetic, excludes it from this head; when describing the complete ma-
thematician (see Arithm. of Brahm. §1)? The commentator proceeds to answer, — 'Mathe-
matics consist of two branches treating of known and of unknown quantity; as expressly declared :
" The science of computation (ganila) is pronounced two-fold, denominated vi/acta and aiyacta
(distinct and indistinct)." The investigation of the pulverizer, like the problem of the affected
square, Cvarga-pracriti. See Vya-ganita, ch. 3), is comprehended in algebra, being subservient
to its solutions; as hinted by the author. (See Vija. § 99)- The separate mention of the head of
investigation of the pulverizer, in passages of AavA-BHATTA and other ancient authors, as well as
in those of Bha'scara and the rest (" By arithmetic, by algebra, by investigation of the pulverizer,
and by resolution of the affected square, answers are found") is designed as an intimation of the
difficulty and importance of the matter; not to indicate it as the subject of a separate treatise: and
this, no less than the head of combination treated in the next chapter (chapter 13), with other
* Seen, or physical; as opposed (o astrology, which is considered to be couvetgant with matters of an unseen and spi-
ritual nature, the invisible influence which connects effects with causes.
PULVERIZER. lis
of a pulverizer,' the dividend, divisor and additive quantity* are, if practi-
cable, to be reduced by some number.' If the number, by which the divi-
dend and divisor are both measured, do not also measure the additive quan-
tity, the question is an ill put [or impossible] one.
249 — 251. The last remainder, when the dividend and divisor are
mutually divided, is their common measure.' Being divided by that com-
mon measure, they are termed reduced quantities.* Divide mutually the
topics (all exclusive of arithmetic, whicli comprises logistics and the rest of the enumerated heads
terminating with measurement by shadow,) falls within algebra, as the precepts of the rules concur
with exercise of sagacity to etfect the solution. (See Fyo, §224). It is then true, concludes this
commentator, that mathematics consist but of two branches. Nevertheless the subjects of this
and of the following chapter are here introduced, to be treated without reference to algebraic so-
lutions, as the Bhadra-gaiiita and other problems* have found place in the arithmetical treatises of
Naba'yan'a and other writers, to be there wrought without algebra; and for the same purpose of
gratifying such as are not conversant with this branch. Gan.
In Biiahmegupta's work the whole of algebra is comprised under this title of Cullacdd'hyiya,
chapter on the pulverizer. See Brahh. ch. 18, and Chaturvbda on Brahmegupta, ch. 12,
S66.
' Cuitaca or Cuiia, from cuti, to grind or pulverize; (to multiply : all verbs importing tendency
to destruction also signifying multiplication. — Gan.)
The term is here employed in a sense independent of its etymology to signify a multiplier such,
that a given dividend being multiplied by it, and a given quantity added to (or subtracted from)
the product, the sum (or difference) may be measured by a given divisor. Sub. on Vij.-gan. and
Lil. Rang, on Fif*. Gan, on Lil.
The derivative import is, however, retained in the present version to distinguish this from mul-
tiplier in general ; cuitaca being restricted to the particular multiplier of the problem in question.
* Csfiepa, or cs/iepaca, nryuti, additive. From cship to cast or throw in, and from yu to mix. A
quantity superinduced, being either affirmative or negative, and consequently in some examples
an additive, in others a subtractive, term.
VUuddHii, subtractive quantity, contradistinguished from cshepa additive, when this is restricted to
an affirmative one. See % 263.
' Apaxiartana, abridgment; abbreviation. — Gas. Depression or reduction to least terms ; di-
vision without remainder : also the number which serves to divide without residue; the common
measure, or common divisor of equal division. Su'r.
* DrtdCha, firm : reduced by the common divisor to the least term. The word is applicable to
the reduced additive, as well as to the dividend and divisor. Brahmegupta uses nick'Mda and
nirapavarta in this sense. — Brahm. 18, § 9.
* Bhttdra-ganita, on the construction of magical squares, &c is the 13th head termed vyttvahira, ai Ancapita
oo combination of numerals, is the 14th, in NVbXyam'a's treatise of arithmetic entitled CauTnudi.
lie LI'LAVATI'. Chapter XII.
Or, the divisor and additive quantity are reduced by the common measure
nine. Dividend 100 Additive 10.
Divisor 7
Here the quotients, the additive and cipher make the series 14 Tl>e miil-
3
10
tiplier is found 2, which, multiplied by the common measure 9. gives the
true multiplier 18.
Or, the dividend and additive are reduced, and further the divisor and ad-
ditive, by common measures. Dividend 10 a 1 1 v i
' •' T\- ■ r, Additive 1.
Divisor 7 .
Proceeding as before, the series is 1 The multiplier hence deduced is 2 ;
2
1
which, taken into the common measure 9, gives 18: and hence, by mul-
tiplication and division, the quotient comes out 30.
Or, adding the quotient and multiplier as found, to [multiples of] their divi-
sors, the quotient and multiplier are 1 30 and 81; or 230 and 144; and so forth.'
256. Rule: half a stanza. The multiplier and quotient, as found for an
additive quantity, being subtracted from their respective abraders, answer
for the same as a subtractive quantity.''
Here the quotient and multiplier, as found for the additive quantity ninety
in the preceding example, namely 30 and 18, being subtracted from their
respective abraders, namely 100 and 63; the remainders are the quotient
and multiplier, which answer when ninety is subtractive : viz. 70 and 45.
Or, these being added to arbitrary multiples of their respective abraders,
the quotient and multiplier are 170 and 108; or 270 and 131; &c.
257. Example.' Tell mc, mathematician, the multipliers severally, by
■ As 330 and 201 ; &c. Gang.
* The rule serves when the additive quantity is negative. — Gaji'. Su'r. It is followed in the
Vya-gariita by half a stanza relating to the change induced by reversing the sign, affirmative or
negative, of the dividend. See V'lj.-gan. §59.
* This additional example is unnoticed by Gan'es'a ; but expounded by the rest of the com-
mentators, and found in all copies of the text that have been collated. See a corresponding one
with an essential variation however in the reading; Vij.-gan. § 67.
PULVERIZER. 117
which sixty being multipHcd, and sixteen being added to the product, or
subtracted from it, the sum or difference may be divisible by thirteen with-
out a remainder.
Statement: Dividend 60 a i r4.- ,/?
T->- ■ ,0 Additive 16.
Divisor 13
The series of quotients, found as before, is 4
1
1
1
1
16
Hence the multipher and quotient are deduced 2 and 8. But the quotients
[of the series] are here uneven : wherefore the multiplier and quotient must be
subtracted from their abraders 13 and 6O: and the multiplier and quotient,
answering to the additive quantity sixteen, are 1 1 and 52. These being
subtracted from the abraders, the multiplier and quotient, corresponding to
the subtractive quantity sixteen, are 2 and 8.
258. Rule :' a stanza and a half. The intelligent calculator should take
a like quotient [of both divisions] in the abrading of the numbers for the
multiplier and quotient [sought]. But the multiplier and quotient may be
found as before, the additive quantity being [first] abraded by the divisor ;
the quotient, however, must have added to it the quotient obtained in the
abrading of the additive. But, in the case of a subtractive quantity, it is
subtracted.
259. Example. What is the multiplier, by which five being multiplied
and twenty-three added to the product, or subtracted from it, the sum or
difference may be divided by three without remainder.
Statement: Dividend 5 . u-^.
n- • c Additive 23.
Divisor 3
Here the series is 1 and the pair of numbers found as before 46 They
1 23
S3
' Applicable when the additive quantity exceeds the dividend and divisor. Ga>. .
118 LI'LAVATl'. Chapter XII.
are abraded by the dividend and divisor 5 The lower number being abraded
3
by 3, the quotient is 7 [and residue 2]. The upper number being abraded
by 5, the quotient would be 9 [and residue 1] : nine, however, is not taken;
but, under the rule for taking like quotients, seven only, [and the residue
consequently is eleven]. Thus the multiplier and (juotient come out 2 and 1 1 .
And by the former rule (^ 256) the multiplier and quotient answering to
the same as a negative quantity are found, 1 and 6".* Added to arbitrary mul-
tiples of their abraders, double for example so as the quotient may be affirm-
ative, the multiplier and quotient are 7 and 4.t So in every [similar] case.
Or, statement for the second rule : Dividends Additive
Divisor 3 abraded 2.;|:
The multiplier and quotient hence found as before are 2 and 4. These sub-
tiacted from their respective divisors, give ] and 1 ; as answering to the sub-
tractive quantity. The quotient obtained in the abrading of the additive,
[viz. 7] being added in one instance and subtracted in the other,* the results
are 2 and 1 1 answering to the additive quantity ; and 1 and 6 answering to
the subtractive : or, to obtain an affirmative quotient, add to the latter twice
their divisors,' and the result is 7 and 4.
260. Rule :' If there be no additive quantity ; or if the additive be
measured by the divisor ; the multiplier may be considered as cipher, and
the quotient as the additive divided by the divisor.^
261. Example. Tell me promptly, mathematician, the multiplier by
which five being multiplied and added to cipher, or added to sixty-five, the
division by thirteen shall in both cases be without remainder.
Statement: Dividends a.iv «
Tx- • ,c. Additive 0.
Divisor 13
* The difference between 5 and 11, viz. 5 — 1 1= — 6. The quotient therclore is negative.
+ Thus 10 (5x2)— 6=4.
I 23, abraded by the divisor 3, gives the quotient 7 and residue 2.
* 4+7=11 and 1—7=— 6.
» 1 + (3 X 2) =7 and — 6+(5 x 2)=4.
* Applicable if there be no additive; or if it be divisible by the divisor without remainder.
' It is so in the latter case: but in the former (where the additive is null) the quotient is cipher.
— SuR. &c. See Fy.-gan, §63.
PULVERIZER. 119
■ There being no additive, the multiplier and quotient are and ; or 1 3
and 5 ; or 26 and 1 ; and so forth.
Statement: Dividend 5 aji-j.- cr
r^- ■ . „ Additive 65.
Uivuor 13
By the rule (§260) the multiplier and quotient come out and 5 ; or 13
and 10; [or 26 and 15 ;] and so forth.
Rule :* Or, the dividend and additive being abraded by the divisor, the
multiplier may thence be found as before ; and the quotient from it, by mul-
tiplying the dividend, adding the additive, and dividing by the divisor.
In the former example (§ 253) the reduced dividend, divisor and additive
furnish this statement : Dividend 17 a jr..- e
T\- ■ ,' Additive 5.
Divisor 15
Abraded by the divisor (15) the additive and dividend become 5 and 2; and
the statement now is Dividend 2 a jj-*- c
Divisor 15
Proceeding as before the two terms found are 5 The lower one, abraded
35
by the divisor (15), gives the multiplier 5. Whence, by multiplying with it
the dividend (17) and adding (the additive) and dividing (by the divisor), the
quotient comes out 6.
262. Rule for finding divers multipliers and quotients in every case :
half a stanza. The multiplier and quotient, being added to their respective
[abrading] divisors multiplied by assumed numbers, become manifold.''
The influence and operation of this rule have been already shown in va-
rious instances.
263. Rule for a constant pulverizer :' two half stanzas. Unity being
taken for the additive quantity, or for the subtractive, the multiplier and
quotient, which may be thence deduced, being severally multiplied by an
This is found in one copy of the text; and is expounded by a single commentator Ganga'd'-
hara; but unnoticed by the rest. It occurs, however, in the similar chapter of the Vija-ganita,
§62.
» See Vij.-gan. § 64.
' St'hira-cuUaca, steady pulverizer. See explanation of the term in the commentary on Brah-
M egupta's algebra.— Bra^TO. ch. ]8, SO — 11. Drt'dha-cul't'aca is there used as a synonymous
term.
120 LI'LA'VATI'. Chapter XII.
arbitrary' additive or subtractive, and abraded by the respective divisors, will
be the multiplier and quotient for such assumed quantity.*
In the first example (§ 253) the reduced dividend and divisor with addi-
tive unity furnish this statement : Dividend 17 * i i ..• ,
'' i-\- ■ . 1 e Additive 1.
Divisor 15
Here the multiplier and quotient (found in the usual manner) are 7 and 8.
These, multiplied by an assumed additive five, and abraded by the respective
divisois(15 and 17), give the multiplier and quotient 5 and 6, for that additive.
Next unity being the subtractive quantity, the multiplier and quotient
thence deduced are 8 and 9. These, multiplied by five and abraded by the
respective divisors, give 10 and 11.
So in every [similar] case.*
Of this method of investigation great use is made in the computation of
planets.' On that account something is here said [by way of instance.]
264. A stanza and a half. Let the remainder of seconds be made the
subtractive quantity,* sixty the dividend, and terrestrial days' the divisor.
The quotient deduced therefrom will be the seconds; and the multiplier
will be the remainder of minutes. From this again the minutes and re-
mainder of degrees are found : and so on upwards.* In like manner, from
the remainder of exceeding months and deficient days,^ may be found the
solar and lunar days.
The finding of [the place of] the planet and the elapsed days, from the
remainder of secqnds in the planet's place, is thus shown. It is as follows.
Sixty is there made the dividend ; terrestrial days, the divisor ; and the re-
" See Vij.-gari. § 71.
* See Goldd'hyaya.
' See Brahmegupta, cb. 18, § 9 — 12.
♦ The present rule is for finding a planet's place and the elapsed time, when the fraction above
seconds is alone given. Gan.
' The number of terrestrial days (nycthemera) in a calpa is stated at 1577916450000. 6'tr»-
tnani, coraputation of planets, ch. 1, § 20 — 21.
' The dividend varies, when the question ascends above the sexagesimal scale, to signs, revo-
lutions, &c.
' Ad'hi-m6sa, additive months ; and Avatna (or Cshayct) dina, subtractive days. See SirSmtuii on
planets, ch. 1, §42, The exceeding months, or more lunar than solar months, in a calpa, are
.15933QOCX)0. The deficient days or/eai<rr terrestrial days than lunar, in a calpa, are 25082550000.
CONSTANT PULVERIZER.
121
mainder of seconds, the subtractive quantity : with which the multiplier
and quotient are to be found. The quotient will be seconds; and the mul-
tiplier the remainder of minutes. From this remainder of minutes taken
[as the subtractive quantity] the quotient deduced will be minutes; and the
multiplier, the remainder of degrees. The residue of degrees is next the
subtractive quantity; terrestrial days, the divisor; and thirty, the dividend:
the quotient will be degrees ; and the multiplier, the remainder of signs.
Then twelve is made the dividend ; terrestrial days, the divisor ; and the re-
mainder of signs, the subtractive quantity : the quotient will be signs ; and
the multiplier, the remainder of revolutions. Lastly, the revolutions in a
calpa become the dividend ; terrestrial days, the divisor ; and the remainder
of revolutions, the subtractive quantity : the quotient will be the elapsed
revolutions; and the multiplier, the number of elapsed days.* Examples of
this occur [in the Siroma/ii] in the chapter of the problems.*
Li like manner the exceeding months in a calpa are made the dividend ;
solar days, the divisor ;' and the remainder of exceeding months, the sub-
tractive quantity : the quotient will be the elapsed additional months; and
the multiplier, the elapsed solar days. So the deficient days in a calpa are
made the dividend ; lunar days, the divisor ;* and the remainder of deficient
days, the subtractive quantity : the quotient will be the elapsed fewer days;
and the multiplier, the elapsed lunar days.'
' The elapsed days of the calpa to the time for which the planet's place is found. The method
of computing elapsed days to any given time is taught in the Siromarii on planets, ch. 1, § 47—49.
* Tri-pramad'hi/aya. Also in the G6ld'd'hi//iya, and Mad'liyagrah£d'hi)6ya. Gang.
' The solar days, each equal to the sun's passage through one degree of its annual revolution,
are 1555200000000 in the calpa. SeeSiromani 1, § 40.
♦ The lunar days, reckoning thirty to the month or synodical revolution, are 1602999OOOOOO in
the calpa. See Sirumaiii 1 , § 40.
' These may be illustrated, as the preceding astronomical example is, and rendered distinctly
intelligible, by instances given by the commentators Ganga'd'haba and Gan'e's'a, and the Manu-
runjana, in arbitrary numbers. Put the terrestrial days in a calpa 19, the revolutions of the
planet 10, the elapsed days 12. Then, by the proportion I9 | 10 | 12 | the planet's place comes
out in revolutions, signs, &c. 6' 3* 23" 41' 3"-^g. In bringing out the seconds, the remainder of
seconds is 3. From this, by an inverse process, the planet's place is 10 be found. Here the re-
mainder of seconds is the subtractive quantity 3; the dividend is 60; and the divisor, IQ. Pro-
ceeding as directed (§256) the multiplier and quotientare found lands. The quotient is the number
of seconds 3 ; and the multiplier is the remainder of minutes 1. Let this be the subtractive quan-
tity, 1 ; the dividend 6O; and the divisor, 19. Proceeding as directed, the multiplier and quotient
K
122 LI'LA'VATI'. Chapter XII.
265. Rule for a conjunct pulverizer.' If the divisor be the same and
the multipliers various;* then, making the sum of those multipliers tlie di-
vidend, and the sum of the remainders a single remainder, and applying the
foregoing method of investigation, the precise multiplier so found is deno-
minated a conjunct one.
266. Example. What quantity is it, which multiplied by five, and di-
vided by sixty-three; gives a residue of seven ; and the same multiplied by
ten and divided by sixty-three, a remainder of fourteen? declare the
number.'
Here the sum of the multipliers is made the dividend ; and the sum of the
residues, a subtractive quantity; and the statement is Dividend 15 g i
Divisor 63
tractive 21. Or reduced to least terms Dividend 5 Subtractive 7
Divisor 21
Proceeding as before, the multiplier is found 14.*
are found 13 and 41. The minutes are therefore 41 ; and the remainder of degrees 13. This again
being the subtractive quantity, 13; the dividend, 30; and the divisor, 19; the multiplier and
quotient are 15 and 23. The degrees then are 23; and the remainder of signs 15. The subtractive
quantity then being 15; thedividend 12; and the divisor 19 ; the multiplier and quotient are 6 and 3.
Thus the signs are 3 ; and the remainder of revolutions 6. This becomes the subtractive quanti-
ty, 6; the dividend, 10; and divisor, 19; whence the multiplier and quotient come out 12 and 6.
The revolutions therefore are 6; and the elapsed time is 12. Gang. Gan. &c.
' Sanslishia-cuitaca or sansHshia-sphuta-cuttaca, a distinct pulverizing multiplier belonging to
conjunct residues. — Gan. A multiplier ('euWacaJ consequent on conjunction ; one deduced from
the sum of multipliers and that of remainders. Su r.
* Whether two, three or more.— Gan. on Lil. and Crishn. on ViJ.
' See another example in the GolffcChy&ya or spherics of the astronomical portion of the Siromani.
Gan. and Cri'shn.
* The quotient as it comes out in this operation is not to be taken : but it is to be separately
sought with the several original multipliers applied to this quantity and divided by the divisor as
given. Gak.
T* .
CHAPTER XIII.
COMBINATION}
9,67- Rule The product of multiplication of the arithmetical series
beginning and increasing by unity and continued to the number of places,
will be the variations of number with specific figures: that, divided by the
number of digits and multiplied by the sum of the figures, being repeated
in the places of figures and added together, will be the sum of the permu-
tations.
268. Example. How many variations of number can there be with two
and eight? or with three, nine and eight? or with the continued series from
two to nine ? and tell promptly the several sums of their numbers.
Statement 1st Example: 2. 8.
Here the number of places is 2. Tlie product of the series from 1 to the
number of places and increasing by unity, (1, 2.) will be 2. Thus the permu-
tations of number are found 2.
That product 2, multiplied by the sum of the figures, 10 [2 and 8] is 20;
and divided by the number of digits 2, is 10. This, repeated in the places of
figures [10 and added together, is 110; the sum of the numbers.
10]
Statement 2d Example : 3. 9. 8.
The arithmetical series is 1. 2. 3 ; of which the product is 6; and so many
' Anca-f&ia-vyavah&ra or Anca-p&sd'd'kydya, concatenation of digits : a mutual mixing of the
numbers, as it were a rope or halter of numerals : their variations being likened to a coil. See
Gan. and Sue.
The subject is more fully treated in the Ganitorcaumudi of Naeayan a Pan'dita.
To find the number of the permutations and the sum or amount of them, with specific num-
bers. Gan. and Sua.
b3
124 LI'LA'VAXr. Chapter XIII.
are the variations of number. That, multiplied by the sum 20, is 120;
which, divided by the number of digits 3, gives 40 ; and this, repeated in
the places of figures [40 and summed, makes 4440 the sum of the
40
40]
numbers.
Statement 3d Example : 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. P.
The arithmetical series beginning and increasing by unity is 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
7. 8. The product gives the permutation of numbers 40320. This, multi-
plied by the sum of the figures 44, is 1774080; and divided by the number
of terms 8, is 221760; and the quotient being repeated in the eight places
of figures and summed, the total is the sum of the numbers 2463999935360.
269. Example. How many are the variations of form of the god
Sambhu by the exchange of his ten attributes held reciprocally in his seve-
ral hands : namely the rope, the elephant's hook, the serpent, the tabor, the
skull, the trident, the bedstead, the dagger, the arrow, and the bow :' as
those of Hari by the exchange of the mace, the discus, the lotus and the
conch ?
Statement: Number of places 10.
In the same mode, as above shown, the variations of form are found
3628800.
So the variations of form of IIari are 24.
' Sambhu or Siva is represented with ten arms, and holding in his ten hands the ten weapons
or symbols here specified ; and, by changing the several attributes from or»e hand to another, a
variation may be efl'ected in the representation of the idol : in the same manner as the image of
Hari or Vishnu is varied by the exchange of his four symbols in his four hands. The twenty-
four different representations of VishnV, arising from this diversity in the manner of placing the
weapons or attributes in his four hands, are distinguished by as many discriminative titles of the
god allotted to those figures in the tlieogonies or I'urd/ias. It does not appear that distinct titles
have been in like manner assigned to any part of the more than three millions of varied represen-
tations of Siva.
The ten attributes of Siva are, \st, pdsa, a rope or chain for binding an elephant ; 2d, ancusa, a
hook for guiding an elephant ; 3(1, a serpent; 4th, Wamaru, a tabor; 5tli, a human skull; 6th, a
trident; 7th, c'/iaftvdnga, a bedstead, or a club in form of the foot of one; 8th, a dagger; 9tb, an
arrow ; lOlh, a bow.
COMBINATION.
125
270. Rule :* The peiinutations found as before, being divided by the
combinations separately computed for as many places as are filled by like
fligits, will be the variations of number; from which the sum of the numbers
will be found as before.
27*1. Example. How many are the numbers with two, two, one and
one? and tell me quickly, mathematician their sum: also with four, eight,
five, five and five ; if thou be conversant with the rule of permutation of
numbers.
Statement 1st Example: 2.2.1.1.
Here the peiTnutations found as before (§ 267) are 24: First, two places
are filled by like digits (2.2.) ; and the combinations for that number of places
are 2. Next two other places are filled by like digits (1.1.); and the combi-
nations for these places are also 2. Total 4. The permutations as before
24, divided by (4) the twofold combinations for two pairs of like digits,
give 6 for the variations of number : viz. 2211,2121, 2112, 1212, 1221,
1 J22." The sum of the numbers is found as before 9999-^
Statement 2d Example : 4.8.5.5.5.
Here the permutations found as before are 120 ; which, divided by the
combinations for three places 6^, give the variations 20: viz. 48555, 84555,
54855, 58455. 55485, 55845, 55548, 55584, 45855, 45585, 45558, 85455,
85545, 85554, 54585, 58545, 55458, 55854, 54558, 58554.
The sum of the numbers comes out 1 199988.*
27i- Rule :* half a stanza. The series of the numbers decreasing by
unity from the last* to the number of places, being multiplied together, will
be the variations of number, withdissin)ilar digits.
' Special ; being applicable when two or more of the digits are alike.
* The enumeration of the possible combinations is termed prastdra.
' The variations 6, multiplied by the sum of the figures 6, and divided by the number of digits
4, give 9 ; which being repeated in four places of figures and summed makes 9999-
* Variations 20, multiplied by the sum of the figures 27, give 540 ; which, divided by the num-
ber of digits 5, makes 108 : and this being repeated in five places of figures and summed, yields
11999^8.
* To find the variations for a definite number of places with indeterminate digits. Gan.
* That is, from nine. - Gan. &c.
126 LI'LAVATI'. Chapter XIII.
273. Example. How many are the variations of number with any digits
except cipher exchanged in six places of figures ? If thou know, declare
them.
The last number is nine. Decreasing by unity, for as many as are the
places of figures, the statement of the series is 9- 8. 7- 6. 5. 4. The product
of these is d0480.»
fi74. Rule :* a stanza and a half. If the sum of the digits be determi-
nate, the arithmetical series of numbers from one less than the sum of the
digits, decreasing by unity, and continued to one less than the places, being
divided by one and so forth, and the quotients being multiplied together, the
product will be equal to the variations of the number.
This rule must be understood to hold good, provided the sum of the digits
be less than the number of places added to nine.
A compendium only has been here delivered for fear of prolixity: since
the ocean of calculation has no bounds.
275. Example. How many various numbers are there, with digits
standing in five places, the sum of which is thirteen ? If thou know, de-
clare them.
Here the sum of the digits less one is 12. The decreasing series from
this to one less than the number of digits, divided by unity, &c. being exhi-
bited, the statement is y y »/ l- The product of their multiplication
[^■~^] is equal to the variations of the number, 495.'
276. Though neither multiplier, nor divisor, be asked, nor square, nor
cube, still presumptuous inexpert scholars in arithmetic will assuredly fail
in [problems on] this combination of numbers.
» The combinations of two dissimilar digits, excluding cipher, are 72 ; with three, 504; with
/our, 3024; with five, 15120; with six 60480.
* To fmd the combinations with indeterminate digits for a definite sum and a specific number
of places. Gan.
' 9U11, 52222, 13333; each five ways. 55111, 22333; each ten ways. 82111, 73111,
64111, 43222, 61222; each twenty ways. 72211, 53311, 44221, 44311; each thirty ways.
6321 1, 54211, 53221, 43321 ; each sixty ways. Total four hundred and ninety-five.
COMBINATION.
127
277- Joy and happiness is indeed ever increasing in this world for those
who have Lildvatl clasped to their throats,* decorated as the members are
with neat reduction of fractions, multiplication and involution, pure and
perfect as are the solutions, and tasteful as is the speech which is exem-
plified.
' By constant repetition of the text. This stanza, ambiguously expressed and bearing a double
import, implies a simile : as a charming woman closely embraced, whose person is embellished
by an assemblage of elegant qualities, who is pure and perfect in her conduct, and who utters
agreeable discourse. SeeGAN.
VtJA-GANlTA,
OR
AVYA CT AG ANITA;
ELEMENTAL ARITHMETIC OR ALGEBRA.
CHAPTER I.
ALGORITHM or LOGISTICS:
SECTION I.
INVOCATION and INTRODUCTION.
1. I REVEKE the unapparent primary matter, which the Sane' hyas^ de-
clare to be productive of the intelligent principle, being directed to that
production by the sentient being : for it is the sole element of all which is
apparent. I adore the ruling power, which sages conversant with the nature
' Paricarma-trituati ; thirty operations or modes of process. Lild. c. 2, §2.
* Not the followers of Capila, but those of Pa'tanjali. The same term Sinc'hya, as relating to
another member of the period, signifies sages conversant with theology and the nature of
soul; and, corresponding again to another member of it, the same word intends calculators and
mathematicians, whose business is with Sanc'hi/d number. Throughout the stanza the same words
are employed in threefold acceptations : and, in translating it, the distinct meanings are repeated
in separate members of a period : because the ambiguity of the original could not be preserved by
a version of it as of a single sentence.
ISO VI'JA-GAN'ITA. Chapter I.
of soul pronounce to be the cause of knowledge, being so explained by a
holy person : for it is the one element of all which is apparent. I venerate
that unapparent computation, which calculators affirm to be the means of
comprehension, being expounded by a fit person : for it is the single element
of all which is apparent.
2. Since the arithmetic of apparent [or known] quantity, which hax
been already propounded in a former treatise, is founded on that of unap-
parent [or unknown] quantity ; and since questions to be solved can hardly
be understood by any, and not at all by such as have dull apprehensions,
without the application of unapparent quantity ; therefore I now propound
the operations of analysis.*
' Fya cause, origin; primary cause (&di-cdrana). — Su'r. Hence signifying in mathematics,
analysis, algebra.
Vija-criyA : operation of analysis ; elemental or algebraic solution. See explanation of the title
o{ Vija-ganita, causal or elemental arilbmetic, ch. 7, §174.
( 131 )
SECTION II.
Logistics of Negative and Affirmative Quantities.
ADDITION.
3. Rule for addition of affirmative and negative quantities : half a stanza.
In the addition of two negative or two affirmative' quantities, the sum must
be taken : but the difference of an affirmative and a negative quantity is
their addition.^
4. Example. Tell quickly the result of the numbers three and four,
negative or affirmative, taken together : that is, affirmative and negative, or
both negative or both affirmative, as separate instances : if thou know the
addition of affirmative and negative quantities.
The characters, denoting the quantities known and unknown,' should be
first written to indicate them generally ; and those, which become negative,
should be then marked with a dot over them.
Statement : 3. 4. Adding them, the sum is found 7.
Statement: 3. 4. Adding them, the sum is 7.
Statement: 3.4. Taking the difference, the result of addition comes
out i.
' Riiia or cshaya, minus ; literally debt or loss : negative quantity,
D'hana or swa, plus ; literally wealth or property : affirmative or positive quantity.
For a demonstration of the rule, the commentators, Su'rtada'sa and Crishn'a, exhibit fami-
liar examples of the comparison of debts and assets.
* Rdsi, quantity, is either vyacta, absolute, specifically known, (which is termed rupa, form,
ipecies ;) or it is avyacta, indistinct, unapparent, unknown (ajnyAta). It may either be a multiple
of the arithmetical unit, or a part of it, or the unit itself. See Ceishna.
S2
132 VI'JA-G ANITA. Chapter I.
Statement : 3. 4. Taking the difference, the result of addition is 1.
So in other instances/ and in fractions'' likewise.
SUBTRACTION.
5. Rule for subtraction of positive and negative quantities : half a
stanza. The quantity to be subtracted being affirmative, becomes nega-
tive ; or, being negative, becomes affirmative : and the addition of the quan-
tities is then made as above directed.'
6. Example : half a stanza. Subtracting two from three, affirmative
from affirmative, and negative from negative, or the contrary, tell me
quickly the result.
I
» For the addition of unknown and compound quantfties and surds, see § 18 — 30.
' Whether known or unknown quantities having divisors. Of such as have like denominators,
the sum or difference is taken. Else, other previous operations take place for the reduction of
them to a common denominator. The same must be understood in subtraction. CniSHN.
' In demonstrating this rule, the commentator Crishn'a bhatta observes, that ' here negation
is of three sorts, according to place, time, and things. It is, in short, contrariety. Wherefore the
LiMvati, § 166, expresses " The segment is negative, that is to say, is in the contrary direction."
As the v^est is the contrary of east ; and the south the converse of north. Thus, of two countries,
east and west, if one be taken as positive, the other is relatively negative. So when motion to the
cast is assumed to be positive, if a planet's motion be westward, then the number of degrees equiva-
lent to the planet's motion is negative. In like manner, if a revolution westward be affirmative, so
much as a planet moves eastward, is in respect of a western revolution negative. The same may
be understood in regard to south and north, &c. That prior and siiljsequent times are relatively
to each other negative, is familiarly understood in reckoning of days. So in respect of chattels,
that, to which a man bears the relation of owner, is considered as positive in regard to him : and
the converse [or negative quantity] is that to which another person has the relation of owner.
Hence so much as belongs to Yqjnyadatta m the wealth possessed by Devadatta, is negative in
respect of Devadatta. The commentator gives us an example the situation of Pattana (Patna)
and Praydga (AUahibdd) relatively to Ananda-vana (Benares). Pattana on the Ganges bears east
of VMriasi, distant fifteen yojanas ; and Praydga on the confluence of the Gangd and Yamvnd,
bears west of the same, distant eight yojanas. The interval or difference is twenty-three yojanas;
and is not obtained but by addition of the numbers. Therefore, if the difference between two
contrary quantities be required, their sura must be taken. Crishw.
Section II.
LOGISTICS.
133
Statement: 3.2. The subtrahend, being affirmative, becomes negative;
and the result is 1 .
Statement : 3. 2. The negative subtrahend becomes affirmative ; and
the result is 1. • ,
Statement: 3. 2. The negative subtrahend becomes affirmative; and
the result is 5.
Statement : 3. 2. The affirmative subtrahend becomes negative ; and
the result is 5.
MULTIPLICATION.
7. Rule for multiplication [and division] of positive and negative quan-
tities : half a stanza. The product of two quantities both affirmative, is po-
sitive.* When a positive quantity and a negative one are multiplied toge-
ther, the product is negative.* The same is the case in division.
' The sign only of the product is taught. All the operations upon the numbers are the same
which were shown in simple arithmetic {LUa. § 14 — 16). Crishn.
* Multiplication, as explained by the commentators,* is a sort of addition resting on repetition
of the multiplicand as manj' times as is the number of the multiplicator. Now a multiplicator is
of two sorts, positive or negative. If it be positive, the repetition of the multiplicand, which is
affirmative or negative, will give correspondently an affirmative or negative product. The multi-
plication then of positive quantities is positive ; and that of a negative multiplicand by a positive
multiplier is negative : as is plain. The question for disquisition concerns a negative multiplier.
It has been before observed that negation is contrariety. A negative multiplier, therefore, is a
contrary one : that is, it makes a contrary repetition of the multiplicand. Such being the case,
if the multiplicand be positive, (the multiplier being negative), the product will be negative ; if the
multiplicand be negative, the product will be affirmative. In the latter case the multiplication
of two negative quantities gives an affirmative product. In the middle instances, either of the two
(multiplicator or multiplicand) being positive, and the other negative, the product is negative: as
is taught in the text.
Or the proof may be deduced from the process of computation. There is no dispute respecting
the multiplication of affirmative quantities: but the discussion arises on that of negative quantity.
Now so much at least is known and admitted, that, the multiplicand being separately multiplied
by component parts of the multiplier, and the products added together, the sum is the product of
the proposed multiplication. Let the multiplicand be 135, and the multiplicator 12 ; and its two
parts, (the one arbitrarily assumed, the other equal to the given number less the assumed one,)
* SvnuADASi on Lildvad. Ganesa on the same. Cbishna-bhatta on Vija-ganita,
184 Vl'JA-GAN'ITA. ChapteeI.
8. Example : half a stanza (completing § g). What is the product of
two multiplied by three, positive by positive; and negative by negative; or
positive by negative ?
Statement: 2. 3. Affirmative multiplied by affirmative is affirmative.
Product 6.
Statement: 2. 3. Negative multiplied by negative is positive. Pro-
duct 6.
Statement : 2. 3. [or 2. 3.] Positive multiplied by negative [or, negative
by positive] is negative. Product 6.
The result is the same, if the multiplicator be multiplied by the multipli-
cand.^
DIVISION.
Rule. The same is the case in division (§ 7).*
9. Example. The number eight being divided by four, affirmative by
affirmative, negative by negative, positive by negative, or negative by po-
sitive, tell me quickly, what is the quotient, if thou well know the method.
4 and 8. Then the multiplicand being separately multiplied by those component parts of the
multiplicator, give 540 and 1080: which, added together, make the product lC20. In like
manner let the assumed portion be 4. The other, (or given number less that) will be l6. Here
also, if die multiplicand be separately multiplied by those parts, and the products added together,
the same aggregate product should be obtained. But the multiplicand, multiplied severally by
those parts, gives 540 and 2l6o. The sum of these numbers [with the same signs] does not agree
with the product of multiplication. It follows therefore, since the right product is not otherwise
obtained, that the multiplication of a positive and a negative quantity together give a negative
result. For so the addition of 540 and 2l6'0 [with contrary signs] makes the product right : vi«.
1620. Crishn.
" It is thus intimated, that either quantity may at pleasure be treated as multiplicator, and the
other as multiplicand : and conversely. Crishv.
* If both the dividend and the divisor be affirmative, or both negative, the quotient is afhrm-
ative: but, if one be positive and the other negative, the quotient is negative. Crishn.
Section II. LOGISTICS. 135
Statement : 8. 4. Affirmative divided by affirmative gives an affirmative
quotient 2.
Statement: 8. 4. Negative by negative gives an affirmative quotient 2.
Statement : 8. 4. Positive by negative gives a negative quotient 2.
Statement : 8. 4. Negative by positive gives a negative quotient 2.
SQUARE AND SQUARE-ROOT.
10. Rule : half a stanza. Tlie square of an affirmative or of a negative
quantity is affirmative ; and the root of an affirmative quantity is two-fold,
positive and negative. There is no square-root of a negative quantity : for
it is not a square.^
11. Example. Tell me quickly, friend, what is the square of the num-
ber three positive ; and of the same negative? Say promptly likewise what
is the root of nine affirmative and negative, respectively?
Statement : 3. 3. Answer : the squares come out 9 and Q.
Statement : 9. Answer : the root is 3 or 3.
Statement : 9. Answer : there is no root, since it is no square.
' For, if it be maintained, that a negative quantity may be a square, it must be shown what it
can be a square of. Now it cannot be the square of an affirmative quantity : for a square is the
product of the multiplication of two like quantities ; and, if an affirmative one be multiplied by an
affirmative, the product is affirmative. Nor can it be the square of a negative quantity : for a ne-
gative quantity also, multiplied by a negative one, is positive. Therefore we do not perceive any
quantity such, as that its square can be negative. Crishn.
( 136 )
SECTION III.
CIPHER.
12. Rule for addition and subtraction of cipher: part of a stanza. In
the addition of cipher, or subtraction of it, the quantity,* positive or nega-
tive, remains the same. But, subtracted from cipher, it is reversed.*
13. Example : half a stanza. Say what is the number three, positive, or
[the same number] negative, or cipher, added to cipher, or subtracted from
it?»
Statement : 3. 3. 0. These, having cipher added to, or subtracted from,
them, remain unchanged : 3. 3. 0.*
Statement : 3. 3. 0. Subtracted from cipher, they become 3. 3. 0.*
' Whether absolute, expressed by digits, or unknown, denoted by letter, colour, &c. or an
irrational and surd root. Cbishn.
* In both cases of addition, and in the first of subtraction, the absolute number, unknown quan-
tity, or surd, retains its sign, whether positive or negative. In the other case of subtraction, the
sign is reversed. Crishn.
' Or having cipher added to, or subtracted from, it. Crishn.
♦ In addition, if either of the quantities be increased or diminished, the result of the addition is
just so much greater or less. If then either be reduced to nothing, the other remains unchanged.
But subtraction diminishes the proposed quantity by so much as is the amount of the subtrahend ;
and, if the subtrahend be reduced, the result is augmented : if it be reduced to nought, the result. .
rises to its maximum ; the amount of the proposed quantity. Or, if the proposed quantity be itself
reduced, the result of the subtraction is diraini!>hed accordingly : if reduced to nought, the result
is diminished to its greatest degree ; the amount of the sublrahend with the subtractive sign. See
ClllSHN.
' Cipher is neither positive nor negative : and it is therefore exhibited with no distinction of
sign. No difference arises from the reversing of it ; and none is here shown. Cuishn.
Section III. LOGISTICS. 137
14. Rule : (completing the stanza, § 12.) In the multiplication and the
rest of the operations* of cipher, the product is cipher ; and so it is in mul-
tiplication by cipher : but a quantity, divided by cipher, becomes a fraction
the denominator of which is cipher." n ,u ntu ni'jio to xioit
15. Example: half a stanza. Tell me the product of cipher multiplied
by two ;' and the quotient of it divided by three, and of three divided by
cipher; and the square of nought; audits root.
.1)
Statement: Multiplicator 2. Multiplicand 0. Product 0. ; „
[Statement : Multiplicator 0. Multiplicand 2. Product 0*.]
Statement : Dividend 0. Divisor 3. Quotient 0.
.■/
Statement : Dividend 3. Divisor 0. Quotient the fraction ^.
This fraction, of which the denominator is cipher, is termed an infinite
quantity.'
' Multiplication, division, square and square-root. Sua. and Crishn.
Multiplication and division are each two-fold: viz. multiplication of nought by a quantity; or
the multiplication of this by nought: so division of cipher by a quantity; and the division of this
by cipher. But square and square-root are each single. Crishk.
* The more the multiplicand is diminished, the smaller is the product ; and, if it be reduced in
the utmost degree, the product is so likewise : now the utmost diminution of a quantity is the same
with the reduction of it to nothing : therefore, if the multiplicand be nought, the product is cipher.
In like manner, as the multiplier decreases, so does the product; and, if the multiplier be nought,
the product is so too. In fact multiplication is repetition: and, if there be nothing to be repealed,
what should the multiplicator repeat, however great it be ?
So, if the dividend be diminished, the quotient is reduced: and, if the dividend be reduced to
nought, the quotient becomes cipher.
As much as the divisor is diminished, so much is the quotient raised. If the divisor be reduced
to the utmost, the quotient is to the utmost increased. But, if it can be specified, that the amount
of the quotient is so much, it has not been raised to the utmost : for a quantity greater than that
can be assigned. The quotient therefore is indefinitely great, and is rightly termed infinite.
Crishn.
* Or else multiplying two. Crishn.
•♦ Crishk.
' Ananta-rdsi, infinite quantity. C'ha-hara, fraction having cipher for its denominator.
This fraction, indicating an infinite quantity, is unaltered by addition or subtraction of a finite
quantity. For, in reducing the quantities to a common denominator, both the numerator and
T
158 VI'JA-G ANITA. Chapter I.
16. In this quantity consisting of that which has cipher for its divisor,
there is no alteration, though many be inserted or extracted ; as no change
takes place in the infinite and immutable God, at the period of the destruc-
tion or creation of worlds, though numerous orders of beings are absorbed
or put forth.
Statement: 0. Its square 0. Its root 0.
denominator of the finite quantity, being multiplied by cipher, become nought : and a quantity is
unaltered by the addition or subtraction of nought. The numerator of the infinite fraction may
indeed be varied by the addition or subtraction of a finite quantity, and so it may by that of another
infinite fraction : but whether the finite numerator of a fraction, whose denominator is cipher, be
more or less, the quotient of its division by cipher is alike infinite. Crisiin.
This is illustrated by the same commentator through the instance of the shadow of a gnomon,^
which at sunrise and sunset is infinite ; and is equally so, whatever height be given to the gnomon,
and whatever numl>er be taken for radius, though the expression will be varied. Thus, if radius
.be put 120; and the gnomon be I, 2, 3, or 4; the expression deduced from the proportion, as
sine of sun's altitude is to sine of zenith distance ; so is gnomon to shadow; becomes LI?, 112
3R0 Of 4jBo._ Qf^ jf tiie gnomon be, as it is usually framed, 12 fingers, and radius be taken at
3438, 120, 100, Qr 90; the expression will be ti|i*, i*^, LSSJi. or l^; which are all alik«
infinite. See CafsHN.
bttsub'ji; •> . .
I
( 139 )
<Sm
SECTION IV.
Arithmetical Operations on Unknown Quantities.
iJV/r.(lA
17. " So much as" and the colours " black, blue, yellow and red,"^ and
others besides these, have been selected by venerable teachers for names of
values* of unknown quantities, for the purpose of reckoning therewith.'
18. Rule for addition and subtraction: Among quantities so designated,
the sum or difference of two or more which are alike must be taken : but
such as are unlike,* are to be separately set forth.
Ani'xsaisi oib IbJ hut
19- Example. Say quickly, friend, what will affirmative one unknown
with one absolute, and affirmative pair unknown less eight absolute, make,
if addition of the two sets take place? and what will they make, if the sum
be taken inverting the affirmative and negative signs ?'
Statement : ya \ ru \ Answer : the sum is ya 3 ru 7.
ya 2 ru 8
' Y6vat-t&vat, correlatives, quanlum, tantum ; quot, tot : as many, or as much, of the un-
known, as this coefficient number. Yavat is relative of the unknown; and tdvat of its coefficient.
The initial syllables of the Sanscrit terms enumerated in the text are employed as marks of un.
known quantities ; viz. y&, c6, ni, pi, 16, (also ha, stce, chi, (sec. for green, white, variegated and so
forth). Absolute number is denoted by ru, initial of r«;)a form, species. The letters of the alphabet
are also used (ch. 6), as likewise the initial syllables of the terms for the particular things (§ 11 1).
* Mdna, mitt, unmdna or vnmiti, measure or value. See note on § 130.
' For the purpose of reckoning with unknown quantities. Sua. and Crishn.
* Heterogeneous : as rupa, known or absolute number : y&vat-tuvat (so much as) the first un-
known quantity, its square, its cube, its biquadrate, and the product of it and another factor;
c&hca (black) the second unknown quantity, its powers, and the product of it with factors : n'daca
(blue) the third unknown, its powers, and so forth. See CnfsuN.
» Inverting the signs of the firstset, of the second, or of both, "' -X'"*" ■ Crishn.
T S
14b VIJA-GANITA. Chapter L
Statemcnt (inverting the signs in the first set) : ya i ru i
Answer r Sum ya I ru 9-
Statement (inverting the signs in the second set) : ya I ru I
ya S, ru S^
Answer: Sum^a I ru Q.
Statement (inverting the signs in both sets) : ya i ru l
ya 2 ru 8
Answer: Sum ya 3 ru7.
£0. Example. Say promptly what will affirmative three square of aft
unknown, with three known, be, when negative pair unknown is added?
and tell the remainder, when negative six unknown with eight known is-
subtracted from affirmative two unknown.
Statement : yav S ya ru 3* Answer : Sum ya v 3 yak ru 3.
yav ya 2 ru
Statement : ya Q ru O Answer : The remainder is ya 8 ra 8.
ya 6 ru 8
. .fll'. Rule for multiplication of unknown quantities: two and a half"
stanzas. When absolute number and colour (or letter) arc multiplied one by
the other, the product will be colour (or letter)." When two, three or more
.(ii
^ The powers of the unknown quantity are thus ordered : first the highest power, for e.\ample
the suTSolid ; then the next, the biquadrate ; after it the cube ; then the square ; next the simple
unknown quantity ; lastly the known species. SeeCaisHN.
* Multiplication of unknown quantity denoted by colour (or letter) is threefold : namely, by
known or absolute number, by homogeneous colour or like quantity, and by heterogeneous colour
or unlike quantity. If the unknown quantity be multiplied by absolute number, or this by the
mnkfiowu quantity, the result of the multiplication in figures is s«t down, and the denominatioo
Section IV.
LOGISTICS.
141
homogeneous quantities are multiplied together, the product will be the
square, cube or other [power] of the quantity. But, if unlike quantities be
multiplied, the result is their (bhavita) ' to be' product or factum. The
other operations, division and the rest,' are here performed like those upon
number, as taught in arithmetic of known quantities.
22. The multiplicand is to be set down in as many several places as there
are terms in the multiplier, and to be successively multiplied by those terms-,
and the products to be added together b}' the method above shown." In this
elemental arithmetic the precept for multiplying by component parts of the
factor, as delivered under simple arithmetic,^ must be understood in the
multiplication of unknown quantities, of squares, and of surds,
23. Example. Tell directly, learned sir, the product of the multiplica-
tion of the unknown (yavat-tdvat) five, less the absolute number one, by
the unknown (ydvat-tdvat) three joined with the absolute two: and also
of the colour is retained. The continued multiplication of like quantities produces, when two ar«
multiplied together, the square; when this is multiplied by a third such, the cube; by a fourth,
the biquadrate ;. by. a fifth, thesursolid ; by a sixth, the cube of the square, or square of the cube.
When heterogeneous colours, or dissimilar unknown quantities, are multiplied together, the result
is a (bhinita) product or factum. Crishn.
Bhdvita, future, or to be. It is a special designation of a possible operation, indicating the raul»
tiplication of unlike quantities. Su'r.
Like the rest of these algebraic terms, it is signified by its initial syllable (bh'i)- Thus the pro-
duct of two unknown quantities is denoted by three letters or syllables, a&y&. cd bhd, c6. n'l bhd, &c.
Or, if one of the quantities be a higher power, more syllables or letters are requisite: for the square,
cube, &c. are likewise denoted by initial syllables, la, gha, in-ra, va-gha (or gha-ra), gha-gha, &iC.
Thus yd la. cd gha bhd will signify the square of the first unknown quantity multiplied by the cube
of the second.
A dot is, in some copies of the text and its commentaries, interposed between the factors, with-
out any special direction, however, for this notation.
' Viz. square and square-root ; cube and cube-root. — Crishn. Also reduction of fractions, to
a common denominator, rule of three, progression, mensuration of plane figure, and the whole of .
what is taught in simple arithmetic. Sua. .
• In §18.
' As well as the other methods there taught. — Crishn. See LUdxati, § 14 — 15.
14t
VrJA-GAN'ITA.
Chapter I.
the result of their multiplication inverting the affirmative and negative signs
in the multiplicand, or in the nmltiplicator, or in both.*
Statement : «a 5 rw 1 _, .
yaS ruZ Product: yavlS yal ru 2.
Statement : vo 5 rw 1 t) j . ,v ~
ya3 ru2, ^^0^"^*^= yav 15 yal ru 2.
Statement : ya 5 ru I ^ i ^
■^ ■ • Product: yav 15 ya7 ru 2.
ya3 ru2 ^ ^
[Statement : ya5 ru\ ^ , ^ , , „ • ,,
^ ^ ■ • Product: yavlS ya7 rw 2.1*
ya3 ru2 ^ ^
24. Rule for division : Those colours or unknown quantities, and abso-
lute numbers, by which the divisor being multiplied, the products in their
several places subtracted from the dividend exactly balance it,' are here the
quotients in division.
Example. Statement of the product of the foregoing multiplication, and
of its multiplicator now taken as divisor : yav\5 ya7 ru 2. It is divi-
dend ; and the divisor \%ya 3 ru Q.
Division being made, the quotient found is the original multiplicand ya 5
ru I.
' The concluding passage is read in three different ways ; the one implying, that the multipli-
cand, affirmative and negative, is to be inverted, or the multiplicator; the second indicating, that
the terras of the multiplicand or multiplicator with their signs are to be transposed ; the third sig-
nifying, that the terms of the multiplicand or multiplier must have their signs changed. — CafsHK.
The commentator prefers the reading and interpretation by which the signs only are reversed.
* This fourth example is exhibited by Crishn'a-biiatta.
Multiplication is thus wrought according to the commentator. Example 1st,
ya 5 ru 1 ya 3 i/a v \5 ya 3
ya 5 ru I ru 2 ya 10 ru2
yav\5 ya 7 ru2
* Exhaust it : leave no residue.
Section IV.
LOGISTICS.
149
i
Statement of the second example: yav \5 yal rw 2 dividend, thfc
divisor being ya 3 ru 2. Answer: The quotient found is the original mul-
tiplicand ya 5 ru 1.
Statement of the third example : ya w 15 yal ru 2, dividend, with di*
visor ya 3 ru 2. The quotient comes out ya 5 ru I, the original multi-
plicand.
[Statement of the fourth example : yav 15 ya? ru Q dividend, with di-
visor _yrt 3 ru 2. Answer: ya 5 ru I, the original multiplicand.]
25. Example of involution.' Tell me, friend, the square of unknown
four less known six.
Statement: _ya 4 ru6. Answer: The square is j/flw 16 ^^0 48 ru 36.
26. Rule for the extraction of the square-root : Deducting from the
squares which occur among the unknown quantities their square-roots, sub-
tract from the remainder double the product of those roots two and two ;
and, if there be known quantities, finding the root of the known number,*
proceed with the residue in the same manner.'
Example. Statement of the square before found, now proposed for ex-
traction of the root : yav 15 ya 48 ru 36.
Answer : The root is ya 4 ru 6 or ya 4 ru 6.
' The square being the product of the multiplication of two liite quantities, involution is com-
prehended under the foregoing rule of multiplication, § 21 ; and therefore an example only is here
given. Cbi'shn.
If the absolute number do not yield a square-root, the proposed quantity was not an exact
square. Crishn.
' When the terms balance without residue, those roots together constitute the root of the pro-
posed square.' Cbishx.
Hi VI'JA-GAN'ITA. Chapter I.
Arithmetical Oparations with several Unknown Quantities.
27. Example. " So much as" three, " black" five, " blue" seven, all
affirmative : how many do they make with negative two, three, and one of
the same respectively, added to or subtracted from them ?
Statement : ya 3 ca 5 ni 7 Answer : Sum ya \ ca 2 ni 6.
ya k ca 3 ni 1 Difference ya 5 ca 8 ni 8.
28. Example. Negative " so much as" three, negative " black" two,
affirmative " blue" one, together with unity absolute : when these are mul-
tiplied by the same terms doubled, what is the result? And when the pro-
duct of their multiplication is divided by the multiplicand, what will be the
quotient ? Next tell the square of the multiplicand, and the root of this
square.
Statement: Multiplicand j/a 3 ca 9, nil ru I. Multiplier 3/a 6 ca 4
ni 2 ru 2. Answer: The product is ^a r 18 ca v S niv 9, ya. ca bh 24
ya. ni bh 1 2 ca. ni bh 8 ru 2.
From this product divided by the multiplicand, the original multiplicator
comes out as quotient ya6 ca i ni 2 ru ^.
Statement of the foregoing multiplicand for involution : ya 3 cak ni 1
ru\. Answer: The square is ^ai> 9 ca o 4 nivX ya. ca bh 12 ya.nibhQ
ca ni bh 4- ya 6 caAs ni 2 ru \.
From this square, the square-root being extracted, is ya3 ca 2 ni 1 ru\
[or^fl 3 ca 2 ni 1 ru 1.]*
' For both these roots being squared yield the same result. CRrsHN.
( 145 )
SECTION V.
.'^M^u
SURDS.
29. Rule for addition, subtraction, &c. of surds:* Term the sum of two
irrationals thegreat^ surd; and twice the square root of their product, the less
one. The sum and difference of these reckoned like integers are so [of the
original surd roots].' Multiply and divide a square by a square.*
30. But the root of the quotient of the greater irrational number divided
by the less,* being increased by one and diminished by one; and the sum and
' Coram, a surd or irrational number. One, the root of which is required, but cannot be found
without residue. — Crishx. That, of which when the square-root is to be extracted, the root does
not come out exact. — Gan. " A quantity, the root of which is to be taken, is named Carani."
Nara'yan'a cited by Sun. Not-generally any number which does not yield an integer root: for,
were it so, every such number (as 2, 3, 5, 6, Sec.) must be constantly treated as irrational. It only
becomes a surd, when its root is required; that is, when the business is with its root, not with tho
number itself. Crishn.
A surd is denoted by the initial syllable ca. It will be here written c to distinguish it from cd
the second unknown quantity in an algebraic expression.
* Mahati, intending mahati carani a great surd, being the sum of two original irrational num-
bers- Laghu, small, is by contrast the designation of the less quantity to be connected with it.
The same terms, mahati and laghvi, are used in the following stanza, § 30, with a different sense,
importing the greater and less original surds. See Su'r. and Crishn.
' The sum and difference of the quantities so denominated are sura and difference of the two
original surds. Su'r. and Crishn.
♦ This is a restriction of a preceding rule concerning multiplication of irrational numbers. § 22.
— Cafsnu'. The author in this place hints the nature of surds, under colour of giving a rule for
the multiplication and division of them. — Su'r. If a rational quantity and an irrational one are to
be multiplied together, the rational one is previously to be raised to the square power; the irra-
tional quantity being in fact a square. See Sua. and Crishn.
' In like manner, if the less surd divided by the greater be a fraction of which the root may be
found, this, with one added and subtracted, being squared and multiplied by the greater surd, will
give the sura and difference of the two surds, CaisHN.
V
146 VI'JA-GAN'ITA. Chapter I.
remainder, being squared and multiplied by the smaller irrational quantity,
are respectively the sum and difference of the two surd roots. If there be no
rational square-root [of the product or quotient], they must be merely stated
apart.
81. Example. Say, friend, the sum and difference of two irrational num-
bers eight and two: or three and twenty-seven; or seven and three; after
full consideration, if thou be acquainted with the six-fold rule of surds.
. Statement: c2 c 8. Answer: Addition being made, the sum is c 18.
Subtraction taking place, the difference is c 2.'
Statement: c3 c 27- Answer: Sum c 48. Difference e 12.
Statement: c 3 c7- Answer: Since their product has no root, they
are merely to be stated apart: Sum c 3 c 7- Difference c 3 c 7.
32. Example. Multiplicator consisting of the surds two, three, and
eight; multiplicand, the surd three with the rational number five: tell
quickly their product. Or let the multiplier be the two surds three and
twelve less the natural number five.
Statement: Multiplier c 2 c3 c 8. Multiplicand c 3 c 25.
Here, to abridge the work, previously adding together two or more surds-
in the multiplier, or in the multiplicand, and in the divisor or in the dividend,
proceed with the multiplication and division. That being done in this case,,
the multiplier becomes c 18 c 3. Multiplicand as before c 25 c 3. Mul-
tiplication being made, the product is found c 9 c 450 c 75 c 54.
33. Maxim. The square of a negative rational quantity will be nega-
• The numbers 8 and 2 added together make 10, the mahati or great surd. Their product !&
yields the root 4; which doubled furnishes 8 for the laghu. The sum and diflerence of these are
18 and 2. Or by the second method, the greater irrational 8 divided by the less 2, gives 4 ; the
root of which is 2. This augmented and diminished by 1, affords the numbers 3 and 1 ; whose
squares are 9 and 1. These, being multiplied by the smaller irrational number, make 18 and 2, a»
Itefore.
Section V. LOGISTICS. 147
tive, when it is employed on account of a surd; and so will the root of a
negative surd be negative, Avhen it is formed on account of a rational num-
ber.'
Statement of the second example: MultipUcator c 25 c3 c 12. Mul-
tiplicand c 25 c 3. Adding together two surds in the multiplier, it be-
comes c 25 c 27. The product of the multiplication is c 625 c 675 c 75
c 81. Among these the roots of c 625 and c 81, namely 25 and 9, being
added together, make the natural number 16: and the sum, consisting in the
difference, of c 675 and c 75, is c 300. The product therefore is rw 16
cSOO.
Statement of the foregoing product for dividend and the multiplier for
divisor: Dividend c 9 c 450 c 73 c 54. Divisor c 2 c 3 c 8.
Adding together two surds, the divisor becomes c 18 c 3. Then proceed-
ing as directed (§ 24), the quotient is the original multiplicand ru 5 c 3.
Statement of the second example: Dividend c 256 c 300. Divisor c 25
c 3 c 12.
Adding together two surds, the divisor becomes c 25 c 27. Here also,
proceeding as before, the quotient found is the original multiplicand ru 5 c 3.
34 — 35. Or the method of division is otherwise taught: Reverse the
sign, affirmative or negative, of any surd chosen in the divisor; and by such
altered divisor* multiply the dividend and original divisor, repeating the ope-
ration [if necessary] so as but one surd remain in the divisor. The surds,
which constituted the dividend, arc to be divided by that single remaining
surd; and if the surds obtained as a quotient be such as arise from addition,
' This is a seeming exception to the maxim, that a negative quantity has no square-root (§ 10).
But the sign belongs to the surd root not to the entire irrational quantity. When therefore a nega-
tive rational quantity is squared to bring it to the same form with a surd, with which it is to be
combined, it retains the negative sign appertaining to the root : and in liice manner, when a root is
extracted out of a negative rational part of a compound surd, the root has the negative sign. Sx/r,
* Or by any number which may serve for extirpating some of the terms. Since the dividend
and divisor being multiplied by the same quantity, the quotient is unchanged : and the object of
the rule is to reduce the number of terms by introducing equal ones with contrary signs. See Sub.
U 2
148 VI'J A-GAN'ITA. Chapter I.
they must be separated by the following rule for the resolution of them,' iu
such form as the questioner may desire.'*
S6. Rule: Take component parts at pleasure of the root of a square, by
which the compound surd is exactly divisible: the squares of those parts,
being multiplied by the former quotient,* are severally the component surds.*
Statement: Dividend c 9 c 450 c 75 c 54. Divisor c 18 c 3.
Here allotting the negative sign to the surd three in the divisor, it he-
come c 18 c 3. Multiplying by this the dividend, and adding the surtb
together,' the dividend is c 5625 c 675. In like manner, the divisor be-
comes c 225. The dividend being divided by this, the quotient is c 25 c 3.
Example 2d. Dividend c 300 c 25*6. Divisor c 25 c 27.
Here assigning to the surd twenty-five the affirmative sign, multiplying
the dividend, and taking the difference of affirmutive and negative surds, the
dividend is c 100 c 12; and the divisor c 4. Dividing the dividend by
this, the quotient is c 25 c 3.
* VUlhha-sutra, a rule for an operation converse of that of addition : (§ Sff ; which comparft
with § 30.)
* They must be resolved into such portions as the nature of the question may require.
' By former quotient, that which is previously found under this rule is meant : the quotient of
the surd by a square which measures it. See Sur.
* This rule, reversing the operations directed by § 30, is the converse of that rule. — See So'«.
However, to make the contrast exact, the root of the square divisor of the surd should be resolved
into parts one of which should be unity.
' The dividend, multiplied by the altered divisor which comprises two terms, gives the product
c 162 C8100 c 1350 C972
e 162 c 27 c 1350 c 225
Expunging like quantities with contrary signs, the product is c 8100 c 972 c 225 c 27 ; and
adding together the first and third terms, and second and fourth, (that is, taking their differences i>y
§ 29 — 30) the product is reduced to two terms c 5625 c 675.
Again the original divisor, multiplied by the altered one, gives c 324 c 54 Expunging equal
c 9 c 54
quantities with contrary signs, the product is c 324 c 9 } reducible by addition (that is, by finding
the difference, § 30) to c 225.
The reduced dividend c 5625 c 675, divided by this divisor c 225, gives the quotient c 25 c 3.
In like manner, by this process in the last example, the dividend becomes c 8712 c 1452 ; and
the divisor c 1 84. Whence the quotient c 1 8 c 3 ; resolvable by § 36 into c 2 c 8 c 3. SuR.
Section V. LOGISTICS. 149
Next in the former example, making the multiplicand a divisor, the state-
ment is dividend c9 c 450 c 75 c 54. Divisor c 25 c 3.
Here also, assigning to the surd three the negative sign, multiplying the
dividend, and adding surds together, the dividend becomes c 8712 c 1452 ;
and the divisor c 484. The dividend being divided by this, the quotient is
the multiplier c 18 c 3. The original multiplicator comprised three terms.
The compound surd c 18 (under the rule for the resolution of such: § 36)
being divided therefore by the square nine, gives the quotient 2 without re-
mainder. The square root of nine is 3. Its parts 1 and 2. Their squares
1 and 4. These, multiplied by the quotient 2, make 2 and 8. Thus the
origiual multiplicator is again found c 2 c8 c 3.
37 — 38. Examples of involution. Tell me, promptly, learned friend, the
square of the three surds two, three, and four; that of two surds numbering
two and three; and separately that of the united irrationals six, five, two, and
three; as well as of eighteen, eight, and two: and the square roots of the
squared numbers.
Statement 1st. c2 c3 c 5. And 2d. c3 c 2. Also 3d. c6 c5 cS
c 3. Likewise 4th. c 18 cS c 2.
Proceeding by the rule of involution^ {Lildvat'i, \ 18 — 19) the squares are
found, 1st. rw 10 c 24 c 40 c 60. 2d. ru 5 c M. 3d. ru 16 c 120
c 72 c 60 c 48 c 40 c 24. Here also, to abridge the work, surds are to
be added together when practicable, whether in squaring, or in extraction of
the square root. Thus 4th. c 18 c2 c 8. The sum of these is c 72. Its.
square is i-u 72.
39 — 40. Rule for finding the square root: From the square of the
rational numbers contained in the proposed square, subtract integer num-
bers* equal to one, two, or more of its surds; the square root of the re-
iinni In'.
' With this difference however, that instead of twice the multiple of rational quantities, four
times the multiple of irrational numbers is to be taken : under the »ule, that a square is to be mul-
tiplied by a square (5 29). iSll\i <!•> SuR.
* A rational number equal to the numbers that express the irrational terms is subtracted : and
the author therefore says " subtract integer numbers frupaj equal to one or more surds," to indi-
cate, that subtraction as of surds (^ 29) is not here intended. Si/r.
150 V r J A - G A N'l T A. C h after I.
mainder is to be severally added to, and subtracted from, the rational num-
ber: the moieties of this sum and difference will be two surds in the root.
The largest of them is to be used as a rational number, if there be any surds
in the square remaining; and the operation repeated [until the proposed
quantity be exhausted].*
Example. Statement of the second square, for the extraction of its root :
ru 5 c 24.
Subtracting from 9.5, which is the square of the rational number (5) a
number equal to that of the surd 24, the remainder is 1. Its square-root 1,
added to, and subtracted from, tlie natural number 5, makes 6 and 4. The
moieties of which are 3 and 2, and the surds composing the root are found,
c3 c2. !' n 'm/jl .ae— ^f.
t adl 111.
Statement of the first square : rw 10 c 24 c40 c 60. >/j
From the square of the rational number (10) viz. 100, subtract numbers
equal to two of the surds twenty-four and forty ; the remainder is 36 ; and
its square-root 6, subtracted from the natural number 10, and added to it,
makes 4 and 16; the moieties of which are 2 and 8. .The first is a surd in
the root, c 2. Putting the second for a rational number, the same operation
is again to be performed with the rest of the surds. From the square of this
then treated as a rational number, 64, subtracting the number sixty, the re-
mainder is 4 ; and its root 2 ; which, subtracted from that rational number,
and added to it, severally makes 6 and 10 ; the moieties whereof are 3 and S.
They are surds in the root: c 3 c 5. Statement of the whole of the surds
composing the root, in their order as found ; c 2 c 3 c 5.
Statement of the third square : ru 16 c 120 c 72 c60 c48 c40 c24.
• From the involution of surds as above shown, it is evident, that the rational number is the sum
-■at
of the numbers of the original surds: and the irrationals in the square are four times tiie product
of the original terms, two and two. If they be subtracted from the square of the sum of tlie num-
bers, the remainder will be the square of the difference. Its square-root is the difference itself.
From the sum and difference, the numbers are found by the rule of concurrence {IMvati, § 55).
The least [or sometimes the greatest] of the numbers thus found is one of the original terms ; and
the greater [or sometimes the less] number is the sum of the remaining irrational terms : it is used,
therefore, as the rational number, in repeating the operation; and so on, until all the terms of the
root, are extracted. . . ;i li.. Su'r.
Section V. ./LOGISTICS. 151
From the square of the rational number (16) 0,56, subtracting numbers
equal to three surds, a hundred and twenty, seventy-two and forty-eight,
making 240, and proceeding as before, two portions are found, 6 and 10.
Again, from the square of the latter as a rational number, 100, subtract
numbers equal to two surds twenty-four and forty, making 64, and proceed
as before ; two portions are found 2 and 8. Again, from the square of the
latter as a rational number 64, subtract a number equal to the surd sixty ;
two more portions are found 3 and 5. Hence statement of the surds com-
posing the root, in order as found, c6 c Z c 3 c 5.
Statement of the fourth square : ru 72 c 0.
Its square-root c 72. This surd-root originally consisted of three terms.
Proceeding then to the resolution of it by the rule (§ 36), 79i divided by 36
gives the quotient 2. The square-root of thirty-six, 6, comprises three por-
tions 3, 2, 1. Their squares are 9, 4 and 1 ; which multiplied by the former
quotient (2) make 18, 8 and 2. The resolution of the surd then exhibits
C 18 c8 c 2.
i, 41. Rule: If there be a negative surd-root in the square, treating that
irrational quantity as an affirmative one, let the two surds in the root be
found [as before] ; and one of them, as selected by the intelligent calculator,
must be deemed negative.*
42. Example. Tell me the square of the difference of the two surds
three and seven; and from the square tell the root.
Statement : c 3 c7 or c 3 c 7.
The square of either of these quantities is the same; ru 10 c 84.
Here treating the negative surd-root in the square as an affirmative irrational
quantity, find the two surds by proceeding as before; and let either of them
at pleasure be made negative. Thus the root is found c 3 c 7 ; or c 3 c 7.
43. Example. Let the irrational numbers two, three and five be seve-
rally affirmative, affirmative and negative ; or let the positive and negative
The rule is grounded on the maxim, that the square of a negative quantity is affirmative;
and that there is no square-root of a negative quantity. § 10. Su'».
tif
VI'JA-GAN'ITA.
Chapter I.
signs be reversed. Tell their square; and from the square find the root; if
thou know, friend, the sixfold method of surds.
Statement : c2 c 3 c5; or c2 c 3 c 5. Their square is the same
ru 10 c 24 c40 c60.
Here affirmative rationals equal to the negative irrationals being sub-
tracted from the square of the rational number (10), 100, the remainder is 0.
The rational number with the root added and subtracted, being halved, the
surds are c 5 c5. One is made negative c5; and the other treated as a
rational number. Statement : r?< 5 c 24. Proceeding as before, the surds
are found, both affirmative, c 3 c 2.
Next subtracting affirmative rationals equal to the two surds c 24 c 60,
viz. 84, from the square of the rational number, and proceeding as before,
the surds found are c 3 c7. The largest of these is made negative ; and,
with its number taken as rational, proceeding as before, the other surds come
out c5 c Q. The greatest of these again is taken as negative, c 5.
Then, with the second example, and in the first instance, the two surds
being c5 c5, one is taken as negative; and, its number being used as a ra-
tional one, the two portions of surds deduced from the negative one, are both
negative c 3 c 2. In the second case, proceeding as directed, the surds of
the root come out, c 2 c 3 c 5.
It might be so understood by an intelligent mathematician, though it
were not specially mentioned. This matter likewise has not been explained
at length by former writers. It is by me set forth, for the instruction of
youth.
44 — 47. Rule : The number of irrational terms in the square quantity
answers to the sum of the progression of the natural numbers one, &c.' In
a square comprising three such terms, integer numbers equal to two of the
terms arc to be subtracted from the square of the rational number, and the
' The sums of the progression are for the 1st term 1 ; for the 2(1, 3 ; for the 3cl, 6 ; for the Ith,
10; for the 5th, 15, — Sur. The rational portion of the square comprises as many terms as there
were surds in the root ; and the number of irrational terms in the square answers to the sum of
the progression continued to one less than the number of radical terms : as the author's subsequent
comment shows.
Section V. LOGISTICS. I5S
square root [of the remainder] to be then taken; in one comprising six such,
integers equal to three of them; in one containing ten, integers equal t©
four of them ; in one comprehending fifteen, integers equal to five. If in
any case it be otherwise, there is error.* Those terms are to be subtracted
from the square of the rational number, which are exactly measured'' by
four times the smaller radical surd thence to be deduced. The quotients
found by that common measure are surds in the root; but, if they be not so,
as not answering by the rule of remainder (§ 39)' that is not the root.*
In a square raised from irrational terms, there must necessarily be rational
numbers. The square of a single surd consists of a rational number only.
That of two contains one surd with a rational number; that of three com-
prises three; that of four comprehends six; that of five, ten ; and that of six,
fifteen. Hence, in the square of two, &c. terms, the number of surd terms,
besides the rational numbers, answer severally to the sums of the arithmetical
progressions [of natural numbers] one, &c. But, if there be not so many in
the example, compound surds are to be resolved (§ 36) to complete tiie num-
ber of terms; and the root is then to be extracted. That is the meaning.
In a square comprising three such terms, [integer numbers equal to two,
&c.] The sense of the whole passage is clear.
48. Example. Say, learned man, what is the root of a square consisting
of the surds thirty-two, twenty-four, and eight, with the rational number
ten?
Statement: rw 10 c 32 c24 c8.
Here, as the square comprises three irrational terms, first subtract integer
numbers equal to two of them from the square of the rational number, and
' If in any supposable case an answer come out, it is not taken as the true root. It is wrong;
and the question was ill proposed. Sub.
* Apaxartana, division without remainder by a common measure. § 54.
' By the rule for adding and subtracting the root of the remainder, &c. § SQ. Sua.
♦ As many of the irrational terms in the square, as are multiples of one of the radical irrationals,
being subtracted in the first instance, they must be divisible without remainder by four times that
radical term ; and the quotients will be the rest of the radical terms : as is apparent from what has
been said concerning the involution of a quantity consisting of surd terms. (See under § 37.) If
then those quotients do not answer, as not agreeing with the terms found by the preceding (§ 39 —
40), the root is wrong. Su'r.
154 VIJ'A-GAN'ITA. Chapter I.
extract the root of the remainder; and afterwards work with one term.
Proceeding in that manner, there is here no root. Hence it appears, that
tlic [proposed quantity] has not an exact root consisting of surd terms. But,
Avere it not for the restriction, a number equal to the whole of the surds
might be subtracted, and a supposed root be thus found: namely, c 8 c2.
This, however, turns out wrong; for its square is ru 18.* Or summing two
of the terms, thirty-two and eight, [by §30] the expression becomes ru 10
c 72 c 24. Whence the root is found rw 2 c6. But this also is wrong.'^
49. Example. Say what will be the root of a square which contains
surds equal to fifteen, eleven, and three, all multiplied by four; with the
rational number ten?
Statement: ru 10 c 60 c52 c 12.
In this square three irrational terms occur. Taking then two of them,-'
fifty-two and twelve, and subtracting an integer equal to their amount from
the square of the rational number, two surds of the root come out c 8 c 2.
But four times the least of them, 8, docs not measure the two terms fifty-two
and twelve. These then are not to be subtracted : for the tenor of the rule
(§ 46) is " Those temis are to be subtracted, which are measured by four
times the smaller radical thence to be deduced." Here the rule is not ri-
gidly restrictive to the least surd ; but sometimes applies to the greater.
Putting: the radical surd as a rational number, the other two irrational terms
*e>
come out c5 c 3. This too is wrong, for the square of c 5 c 3 c 2, is rw 10
c24 c40 c60.'
50. Example. Say what will be the root of a square which consists of
three surds eight, fifty-six, and sixty; with the rational number ten?
Statement: rw 10 c8 c 56 c60.
Subtracting the two first terms eight and fifty-six, and measuring those
terms by four times the least surd thence deduced, 8, two terms are found
1 and 7. But these do not come out as surds of the root by the regular pro-
cess of the rule of remainder (§ 39). Therefore those terms c 8 c56, are
not to be subtracted. Else the root is wrong.
* For the surds c 8 c 2, being added together (§ 31) make c 18. Its square is of course ru 1 8.
* For its square is ru 10 c 96.
* Differing from the proposed square.
Section V.
LOGISTICS.
155
5 1 . Example. Tell the root of the square, in which are surds twelve,
fifteen, five, eleven, eight, six, all multiplied by four; together with the ra-
tional number thirteen; if thou have pretensions to skill in algebra.
Statement: rwlS c 48 c60 c20 c44. c 32 c 24.
Here, the square comprising six surd terais, integers equal to three of them
are to be first subtracted from the square of the rational term, and the root
of the remainder taken; then integers equal to two; and afterwards an inte-
ger equal to one. Proceeding in this manner, no root is found. Proceeding
then differently, and first subtracting from the square of the rational number,
an integer equal to the first surd term; then integers equal to the second and
third; and lastly equal to the rest; the root comes out c\ c2 c5 c5.
This, however, is wrong; for its square is rw 13 c 8 c 80 c 160.
Defect then is imputable to those authors, who have not given a limitation
to this method of finding a root.
In the case oi such irrational squares, the operation must be conducted by
taking the approximate roots of the surd terms, and adding them to the ra-
tional terms: whence the square root is to be deduced.'
Largest is not rigidly intended (§ 40). Sometimes, therefore, the least is
to be used.
52. Example. Say what is the root of a square, in which are the surds
forty, eighty, and two hundred, with the rational number seventeen.^
Statement: rw 17 c40 c 80 c200.
Subtracting the two last terms from the square of the rational number, the
two portions found are c 10 cT. Again treating the smaller surd as a ra-
tional number, the result is c5 c2. Thus the root is c 10 c S c 2.
' A rule of appruximation for the square-root is given in the Chapter on Algebra, in the
Sidd'hdnta-sundara of Jnta'na-ra'ja, cited by his son Su'ryada'sa; "The root of a near square,
with the quotient of the proposed square divided by that approximate root, being halved, the moi-
ety is a [more nearly] approximated root; and, repeating the operation as often as necessary, the
nearly exact root is found." Example 5. This, divided by two which is first put for the root, gives
f for the quotient: which added to the assumed root 2, makes §; and this, divided by 2, yielJs ^
for the approximate root. — Su'r. [Repeating the operation, the root, more nearly approximated,
is W-]
CHAPTER II.
PULVERIZER.'
53 — 64. 'Rule: In the first place, as preparatory to the investigation of
the pulverizer, the dividend, divisor, and atlditive quantity are, if practicable,
to be reduced by some number.' If the number, by which the dividend and
divisor are both measured, do not also measure the additive quantity, the
question is an ill put [or impossible] one.*
54 — 55 — 56. The last remainder, when the dividend and divisor are mu-
tually divided, is their common measure.* Being divided by that common
* This is nearly word for word the same with a chapter in the Lildtati on the same subject.
(Li7. Ch. 12.) See there, explanations of the terras.
The method here taught is applicable chiefly to the solution of indeterminate problems that pro-
duce equations involving more than one unknown quantity. See ch. 6.
* Ten stanzas and two halves.
* If the dividend and divisor admit a common measure, they must be first reduced by it to their
least terras; else unity will not be the residue of reciprocal division; but the common measure
will; (or, going a step further, nought.) — Ga'n. on Lil. Crishn. on Vy.
* If the dividend and divisor have a common measure, the additive also must admit it; and the
three terms be correspondently reduced: for the additive, nnkss it be [nought or else] a multiple
of the divisor, must, if negative, equal the residue of a division of the dividend taken into the mul-
tiplier by the divisor; and, if affirmative, must equal the complement of that residue to the divisor.
Now, if dividend and divisor be reducible to less terras, the residue of division of the reduced terms,
multiplied by the common measure, is equal to the residue of division of the unreduced terms.
Therefore the additive, whether equal to the residue, or to its complement, must be divisible by the
common measure. Crishn.
* The common measure may equal, but cannot exceed, the least of the two numbers : for it
must divide it. If it be less, the greater may be considered as consisting of two terras, one the
quotient taken into the divisor, the other the residue. The common measure cannot exceed that
residue; for, as it measures the divisor, it must of course measure the multiple of the divisor, and
PULVERIZER. 157
measure, they are termed reduced quantities. Divide mutually the reduced
dividend and divisor, until unity be the remainder in the dividend. Place
the quotients one under the other; and the additive quantity beneath them,
and cipher at the bottom. By the penult multiply the number next above
it, and add the lowest term. Then reject the last and repeat the operation
until a pair of numbers be left. The uppermost of these being abraded by
the reduced dividend, the remainder is the quotient. The other [or lower-
most] being in like manner abraded by the reduced divisor, the remainder is
the multiplier.'
could not measure the remaining portion or residue, if it were greater than it. When therefore the
greater number, divided by the lesi, yields a residue, the greatest common measure, in such case,
is equal to ihe remainder, provided this be a measure of the less. If again the less number, divided
by the remainder, yield a residue, the common measure cannot exceed this residue ; for the same
reason. Therefore no number, though less than the first remainder, can be a common measure, if
it exceed the second remainder: and the greatest common measure is equal to the second remain-
der, provided it measure the first; for then of course it measures the multiple of it, which is the
other portion of the second number. So, if there be a third remainder, the greatest common mea-
sure is either equal to it, if it measure the second ; or is less. Hence the rule, to divide the greater
number by the less, and the less by the remainder, and each residue by the remainder following,
until a residue be found, which exactly measures the preceding one; such last remainder is the
common measure. (§ 54). CRfsHN.
' The substance of Cri'shn'a's demonstration is as follows: When the dividend, taken into the
multiplier, is exactly measured by the divisor, the additive must either be null or a multiple of the
divisor. (See § 63). If the dividend be such, that, being multiplied by the multiplicator and di-
vided by the divisor, it yields a residue, the additive, if negative, must be equal to that remainder;
(and then the subtractive quantity balances the residue;) or, if affirmative, it must be equal to the
difference between the divisor and residue ; (and so the addition of that quantity completes the
amount of the divisor;) or else it must be equal to the residue, or its complement, with the divisor
or a multiple of the divisor added. Let the dividend be considered as composed of two portions
or terms: 1st, a multiple of the divisor; 2d, the overplus or residue. The first multiplied by the
multiplier (whatever this be), is of course measured by the divisor. As to the second, or overplus
and remainder, the additive being negative, both disappear when the multiplier is quotient of the
additive divided by the remainder, (the additive being a multiplier of the residue.) But, if the
additive be not a multiple of the remainder, should unity be the residue at the first step of the re-
ciprocal division, the multiplier will be equal to the additive, if this be negative, or to its comple-
ment to the divisor, if it be positive; and the corresponding quotient will be equal to the quotient
of the dividend by the divisor multiplied by the multiplicator, if the additive be negative; or be
equal to the same with addition of unity, if it be affirmative: and, generally, when reciprocal divi-
sion has reached its last step exhibiting a remainder of one, the multiplier, answering to the pre-
ceding residue, become the divisor, as serving for that next before it become dividend, is equal to
fi4 VIJ'A-GAN'ITA. Chapter II.
57- Thus precisely is the operation when the quotients are an even num-
ber. But, if they be odd, the numbers as found must be subtracted from
tbe additive, if this be negative, or to its complement, if it be positive; and the corresponding quo*
taent is equal to the quotient of the dividend by the divisor multiplied by this raultiplicator; but
with unity superadded, if the additive were affirmative. From this, the raultiplicator and quotient
answering for the original dividend and divisor are found by retracing the steps in the method of
inversion. Take the following example :
Given Dividend 1211 « u-.- n, 7 or, reduced to least terms, f Dividend 173 » u-.- a
r, • .n-r Additive 21 > ' c t" . i t^ S r>; : n. Additive 3.
Divisor 497 3 § 53 and 54, (^ Divisor /I
The reciprocal division (§ 55) exhibits the following results:
Dividends. Divisors. Quotients. Residues.
173 71 2 31
71 31 2 9
31 9 3 4
9 4 2 1
Consider last dividend (9) as composed of two terms ; a multiple of divisor (4) and the residue;
(in the instance 8 and 1). Then the multiplier is equal to (3) the additive (this being negative);
and quotient is equal to the multiplier (3) taken into the quotient of the simple dividend (9) by the
divisor (4) : (in the instance 6). Thus, observing the directions of the rule(§ 53, 56) the last term
in the series is the multiplier for the last dividend, and its product into the term next above it is
the quotient of the last divisor; and the series now is 2 deduced from the series (§ 55) 2
2
3
6 Quotient.
3 Multiplier.
Hence to find the multiplier for the next superior dividend and divisor (31 and 9) consider the
dividend as comprising two portions or terms; viz. 27 and 4. Any multiple of the first being divi-
sible by the divisor (9) the multiplier is to be sought for the second portion; that is, for dividend
4 and divisor 9; being the former divisor and dividend reversed: wherefore multiplier and quo-
tient will here be transposed ; and will answer for the affirmative additive : and the series now
becomes 2
2
3
6 Multiplier.
3 Quotient.
But the quotient of the first portion of the dividend (27) after multiplication by this multiplicator,
will be the quotient (3) of the simple dividend taken into the multiplicator (6); which, as is appa-
rent, is the term of the series next beneath it: to which add the quotient of the second portion,
which is last term in the series, and the sum is the entire quotient (21). And the lowest term (3),
being of no further use, may be now expunged : as is directed accordingly (§ 56). Thus the series
now stands 2
2
21 Quotient.
6 Multiplier.
PULVERIZER.
159
their respective abraders, the residues will be the true quotient and multi-
plier.' _
The next step is to fiml the multiplier and quotient (the additive being still the same) for the
next preceding dividend and divisor; viz. 71 and 31 : and here the dividend consists of two parts
62 and 9 ; to the last of which only the multiplier needs to be adapted ; viz. to dividend 9 and di-
visor 31 ; which again are the former divisor and dividend inverted: wherefore the multiplier and
quotient are here also transposed; and the quotient of the first portion is to be added : and is the
quotient (2) of the simple dividend taken into the multiplier (21) the two contiguous terms in the
series. The entire quotient therefore is 48 answering to the same additive but negative: and the
lowest term being no longer required may now be rejected: the series consequently exhibits
2
48 Quotient.
21 Multiplier.
Lastly, to find the multiplier and quotient for the next superior, which are the final dividend and
divisor 173 and 71- Taking the dividend as composed of 142 and 31 ; and seeking a multiplier
which will answer for the second portion 31 with the divisor 71 ; the multiplier and its quotient are
the former transposed: and the entire quotient is completed by adding the product of the upper
terms of the series, (and answers to the same additive but affirmative) ; after which the lowest term
is of no further use : and the series is now reduced by its rejection to two terms, viz.
117 Quotient.
48 Multiplier.
Thus, according to the tenor of the rule, the work is to be repeated as many times as there are
quotients of the reciprocal division ; that is, until two terms remain (§ 56). In all these operations,
except the first, the multiplier is last term but one in the series; and the quotient of the second
portion of the dividend is the last. But, in the first operation, there is no quotient of a second por-
tion to be added. Therefore, for the sake of uniformity in the precept, a cipher is directed to be
added at the foot of the series (§ 55), that the multiplier may always be penultimate.
If the multiplier be increased by the addition of any multiple of the -tiivisor, the corresponding
quotient will be augmented by an equi-raultiple of the dividend (§ 64); and, in like manner, if the
multiplier be lessened by subtraction of any multiple of the divisor, the quotient is diminished by
the like multiple of the dividend. Wherefore it is directed to divide the pair of numbers remain-
ing in the series, by the dividend and divisor, and the remainders are the quotient and multiplier
in their least terras. (§ 56.) CiifsiiN.
' The multiplier for the last dividend, being put equal to the additive, is adapted, as has been
observed, (see preceding note,) to a negative additive ; and thence proceeding upwards, the multi-
plier and quotient, which are transposed at each step, are alternately adapted to positive and nega-
tive additives; that is, at the uneven steps to a negative one; and at the even, to a positive one.
If then the number of dividends, or, which is the same, that of the quotients of reciprocal division,
be even, the multiplier and corresponding quotient are adapted to a positive additive; if it be odd,
they are so to a negative one. In the latter case, therefore, the complement of each to the divisor
and dividend respectively, is taken, to convert them into multiplier and quotient adapted to an
affirmative additive. For the dividend, being multiplied by the divisor and divided by the same,
hu DO remainder, and the quotient is equal to the dividend: therefore when it is multiplied by a
160 VIJ'A-GAN'ITA.
58. The multiplier is also found by the method of the pulverizer, the
additive quantity and dividend being either reduced by a common measure,
[or used unreduced.]' But, if the additive and divisor be so reduced, the
multiplier found, being multiplied by the common measure, is the true one.*
59. The multiplier and quotient, as found for an additive quantity, being
subtracted from their respective abraders, answer for the same as a subtrac-
tive quantity.' Those deduced from an affirmative dividend, being treated
in the same manner, become the results of a negative dividend.*
60. A half stanza. The intelligent calculator should take a like quo-
tient [of both divisions] in the abrading of the numbers for the multiplier
and quotient [sought].'
number less than the divisor, and separately by the complement of this maltiplier to the divisor,
both products being divided by the divisor, should the one have a positive remainder, the other will
want just as much to complete the amount of the divisor ; and the quotient of the one added to
that of the other [completed] will be equal to the dividend. Wherefore, if the quotient and mul-
tiplier for a negative additive be subtracted from their respective abraders, (the dividend and divi-
sor,) the differences will be the quotient and multiplier for a positive additive, and conversely.
(§ 57 and 59). Crishi^.
* Gan'es'a on Lildvati.
* The quotient at the same time found will be the true one. — GAy'.onLil. In the former instance^
the quotient as found was to be multiplied by the common measure. — Ibid. If the dividend and
additive be abridged, while the divisor remains unchanged, it is plain, that the quotitnt will be an
abridged one, and must be multiplied by the common measure to raise the quotient for the original
numbers. In like manner, if the divisor and additive be reduced to least terms, while the dividend
is retained unaltered, the multiplier thence deduced must be taken into the common measure.
If separate common measures be applicable to both, viz. dividend and additive, the multiplier and
quotient, as thence found in an abridged form, must be multiplied by the common measures respec-
tively. Crishn. on Vij.
Su'byada'sa directs the multiplier alone to be found by this abbreviated method, and then to
use the multiplier thence deduced for finding the quotient. See Su'r. on Lil.
3 See the beginning of note (') to § 56; and the note (') to § 57. See also the author's remark
after § 67.
A change of the sign in the dividend has the like effect on the results; and the complement of
the multiplier to the divisor, and that of the quotient to the dividend, are the multiplier and quo-
tient adapted to the dividend with an altered sign. See the sequel of this stanza. § 59.
* This second half of the stanza is not inserted in the Lildvati, Crishn'a, the commentator of
the Vija-Ganita, notices with censure a variation in the reading of the text ; " Those deduced from
a negative dividend, being treated in the same manner, become the results of a negative divisor."
' The rule is applicable when the additive quantity exceeds the dividend and divisor.
PULVERIZER. 161
• 61. But the multiplier and quotient may be found as before, the additive
quantity being [first] abraded by the divisor; the quotient, however, must
have added to it the quotient obtained in the abrading of the additive.
But, in the case of a subtractive quantity, it is subtracted.
62.' Or the dividend and additive behig abraded by the divisor, the mul-
tiplier may thence be found as before; and the quotient from it, by multi-
plying the dividend, adding the additive, and dividing by the divisor/
63. If there be no additive quantity, or if the additive be measured by
the divisor, the multiplier may be considered as cipher, and the quotient as
the additive divided by the divisor.'
64. Haifa stanza. The multiplier and quotient, being added to their
* This stanza, omitted in the greatest part of the collated copies of the LU&vati and by most of
its commentators, occurs in all copies of the Vija-gaiiita, and is noticed by the commentators of the
algebraic treatise.
* If the divisor be contained in the additive, this is abraded by it, and the remainder is employed
as a new additive (§6l). Here the additive is composed of two portions or terms: one a multiple
of the divisor; the other the remainder or new additive : from the latter the multiplier is found;
such, that, multiplying the dividend by it, and adding the reduced additive, the sum, divided by the
divisor, yields no remainder. The other portion of the additive, being a multiple of the divisor, of
course yields none; but the quotient is increased by as many times as the divisor is contained in it,
if it be positive ; or reduced by as much, if it be negative.
If both dividend and additive contain the divisor, abrade both by it, and use the remainder as
dividend and additive: whence find the multiplier: which will be the same as for the whole num-
bers: and the proof is similar, grounded on considering the dividend as composed of two portions.
The quotient, however, is regularly deduced by the process at large of multiplying the dividend by
the multiplier, adding the additive, and dividing by the divisor (§ 62). Or it may be deduced from
the quotient that is found with the multiplier, by adding to that quotient, or subtracting from it,
the sum or the difference (according as the additive was positive or negative) of the dividend taken
into the multiplier and the additive, both divided by the divisor. This last mode is unnoticed by
the author, being complex. CafsHN.
' If the additive be nought, multiply the dividend by nought, the product is nought, which being
divided by the divisor, the quotient is nought, and no remainder. If the additive be a multiple of
the divisor, multiply the dividend by nought, the product is nought; and the operation is confined
to the division of the additive by the divisor. Being a multiple of it, there is no remainder; and
jhe quotient of this division is the quotient sought. CufsHrf,
162 VUA-GAN'ITA. Chapter II.
respective [abrading] divisors multiplied by assumed numbers,' become mani-
fold.*
65. Example. Say quickly, mathematician, what is that multiplier, by
which two hundred and twenty-one being multiplied, and sixty-five added
to the product, the sum divided by a hundred and ninety-five becomes cleared
(giving no residue)?
Statement: Dividend 221 Ajr*.- /?*-
D, „_ Additive 65.
ivisor 195
Here the dividend and divisor being divided reciprocally ; the dividend,
divisor and additive, reduced to their least terms by the last of the remain-
ders 13, become Dividend 17 ajj-*.- r
' T\- • t^ Additive 5.
Divisor 15
The reduced dividend and divisor being mutually divided, and the quo-
tients put one under the other, the additive under them, and cipher at the
bottom, the series which results is 1
7
5
Multiplying by the penult the number above it and proceeding as di-
rected [§ 56], the two quantities obtained are 40
35
These being abraded by the reduced dividend and divisor 17 and 15, the
quotient and multiplier are found 6 and 5. Or, adding to them arbitrary
multiples of their abraders, the quotient and multiplier are 23, 20; or 40,
35, &c.
66. Example. If thou be expert in the investigation of such questions,
' To arbitrary multiples of the divisors used in abrading the pair of terms, from which they are
deduced as residues of a division ; in other words, multiples of the reduced dividend and divisor
which had been used as divisors of the pair of terras.
* Additive apart, if the multiplier be equal to a multiple of the divisor, the quotient will be an
equimultiple of the dividend. Wherefore, if additive be null, the multiplier is cipher (§ 63) witk
or without a multiple of the divisor added; and the corresponding quotient will be cipher with a
like multiple of the dividend : and generally, the multiplier and quotient having been found for
any given additive, dividend and divisor, equimultiples of the divisor and dividend may be respec-
tively added to the multiplier and quotient. Sec Crishn.
PULVERIZER. 163
tell me the precise multiplier, by which a hundred being multiplied, with
ninety added to the product or subtracted from it, the sum or the difference
may be divisible by sixty-three without a remainder.
Statement: Dividend 100 ajjv t ,. 4.- ^n
TA- • cc Additive or subtractive 90.
Divisor §3
Here the series is 1 And the quotient and multiplier found as before
1 are 30 and 18.
1
2
2
1
90
Or the dividend and additive being reduced by the common measure ten,
the statement is Dividend 10 ^^
Divisor 63
The series is And the multiplier comes out 45. The quotient is here not
6
3
9
to be taken. As the quotients in this series are an odd number, the multi-
plier 45 is to be subtracted from its abrader 63; and the multiplier thus
found is the same 18. The dividend being multiplied by that multiplier,
and the additive quantity being added, and the sum divided by the divisor,
the quotient found is 30.
Or the divisor and additive are reduced by the common measure nine:
Dividend 100 Ajditiyejo The series then is 14 The multiplier thence
Divisor 7 ' 3
10
deduced is 2: which multiplied by the common measure 9, makes the
same 18.
Or, the dividend and additive are reduced, and further the divisor and ad-
ditive, by common measures. Dividend 10 . i v.-
Divisor 7 ^'''^''^^^ ^'
Proceeding as before, the series is 1 Hence the multiplier is found 2;
2
1
"^'
Y 2
104 VIJA-GANITA. Chapter II.
which multiplied by the common measure of the divisor and additive (viz. 9)
becomes the same 18. Whence, by multiplication and division, the quo-
tient is found 30.
Or, adding to the quotient and multiplier arbitrary multiples of their divi-
sors, the (juotient and multiplier are 130, 81 ; 230, 144, &c.
67. Example. Tell me, mathematician, the multipliers severally, by
which the negative number sixty being multiplied, and three being added to
the product, or subtracted from it, the sum or difference may be divided by
thirteen without remainder.*
Statement: Dividend 60 ajv*.- / 1* >.• \ »
^^■ • ,0 Additive (or subtractive) 3.
Divisor 13 ^ ^
Found as before* for an affirmative dividend and positive additive quantity,
the multiplier and quotient arc 1 1 and 5 1 . These, subtracted from their
abraders 13, 60, give for a negative dividend and positive additive [§ 59] 2, 9-
Thcse again, subtracted from their abraders 1 3, 60, give for a negative divi-
dend and negative additive 11, 51. " Those (the multiplier and quotient)
deduced from an affirmative dividend, being treated in the same manner,
become results of a negative dividend." (§ 59)- This has been by me spe-
cified to aid the comprehension of the dull: for it followed else from the
rule, " The multiplier and quotient, as found for an additive quantity, being
subtracted from their respective abraders, answer for the same as a subtrac-
tive quantity :" [ibid.] since the addition of negative and affirmative is pre-
cisely subtraction. Accordingly taking the dividend, divisor and additive
as all positive, the multiplier and quotient are to be found : they are results
of an additive quantity. Subtracting them from their abraders, they aie
to be rendered results of a negative quantity.
If either the dividend or its divisor become negative, the quotients of re-
ciprocal division would be to be stated as negative: which is a needless trou-
ble. Were it so done, one (either dividend or divisor) becoming negative,
* This stanza differs from one in the Lildvati (§ 257) in the amount of the additive or subtractive
quantity; and in specifying the sign of the dividend. It comprises two examples: the additive
being either negative or positive.
* The series is^^rt-^^-icoo; whence the pair of numbers @ "^ : which abraded give oi w ;
and, the quotients being uneven in number, they are subtracted from their abraders % 2 and yield
the quotient and multiplier 51, II, CaisuK.
PULVERIZER. 165
there would be error in the quotient [and multipher'] under the last men-
tioned rule (§ 64;.
68. Example. By what number being multiplied will eighteen, having
ten added to the product, or ten subtracted from it, yield an exact quotient,
being divided by the negative number eleven?*
Statement . Dividend 1 8 ^^^-^-^^ ^^^ subtractive) 1 0.
Divisor 1 1
Here the divisor being treated as affirmative, the multiplier and quotient
are 8, 14. The divisor being negative, they are the same: but the quotient
must be considered to have become negative, since the divisor is so; 8, 14.
The same, being subtracted from their abraders, become the multiplier and
quotient for the negative additive ; 3, 4.
69. Example. What is the multiplier, by which five being multiplied,
and twenty-three added to the product, or subtracted from it, the sum or dif-
ference may be divided by three without remainder?
Statement: Dividend 5 a 1 i-.- / 1. ^' \/,o
T-,. . _ Additive (or subtractive) 23.
Divisor 3 ^ ^
Here the series is 1 and the pair of numbers found as before is 46
1 23
23
These are to be abraded by the dividend and divisor. The lower number
being abraded by three, the quotient is seven. The upper one being so by
five, the quotient would be nine. This, however, is not accepted: but, un-
der the rule for taking a like quotient (§ 60), seven only. Thus the multi-
plier and quotient are found 2, 11. By the former rule (§ 59) the multiplier
and quotient answering to the same as a negative quantity come out 1, 6.
Added to arbitrary multiples of their abraders (§ 63), so as the quotient ma}'
be affirmative, the multiplier and quotient are 7, 4, &c. So in every [similar]
case.
Or, applying another rule (§61), the statement is Divd. 5 Abraded
Divr. 3 Additive
• The error would be in the multiplier as well as the quotient. CaiiHK.
? An example not inserted in the LUdvati; being algebraic.
166 VI'JA-GANITA. Chapter 11.
The multiplier and quotient hence found as before are 2, 4. Tliese, sub-
tracted from their respective divisors, give 1, 1 ; as answering to the subtrac-
tive quantity. The quotient obtained iu abrading the additive being added,
the result is 2, 11, answering to the additive quantity; or subtraction being
made, 1, 6, answering to the subtractive; or (adding thereto twice the divi-
sors, to obtain an affirmative quotient,) 7, 4.
70. Example. Tell me, promptly, n)athematician, the multiplier, by
which five being multiplied and added to cipher, or added to sixty-five, the
division by thirteen shall in both cases be without remainder.
Statement: Dividends ajjv «
T^. • - _ Additive 0.
Divisor 1 3
There being no additive quantity, the multiplier and quotient are 0, 0; er
13,5.
Statement: Dividend 5 Additive 65.
Divisor 13
By the rule (§ 63) the multiplier is cipher, and the quotient is the additive
divided by the divisor, 0, 5 ; or 13, 10, &c.
71. Rule for a constant pulverizer:' Unity being taken for the additive
quantity, or for the subtractive, the multiplier and quotient, which may be
thence deduced, being severally multiplied. by an arbitrary additive or sub-
tractive,* and abraded by the respective divisors, will be the multiplier and
quotient for such assumed quantity.'
In the first example (§ 65) the statement of the reduced dividend and divi-
sor, with additive unity, is Dividend 17 Additive 1. Here the multiplier and
Divisor 15 '^
* A rule which is of especial use in astronomy. — Crishn. Su'r. See Algebra of Braiime-
GUPTA, § 9 — 12, and § 35.
* If the arbitrary additive be positive, the multiplier and quotient, as found for additive unity,,
are to be multiplied by the arbitrary affirmative additive. If it be negative, those found for sub-
tractive unity are to be multiplied by the arbitrary subtractive, or negative additive. Crishn.
' The rule may be explained by that of proportion : if unity as the additive (or subtractive)
quantity give this multiplier and this quotient, what will the assumed additive (or subtractive)
quantity yield ? Crisbw.
CONSTANT PULVERIZER. l67
quotient are found 7, 8. These, multiplied by an assumed additive five, and
abraded by the respective divisors, give for the additive 5, the multiplier and
quotient 5, 6.
Next, unity being the subtractive quantity, the multiplier and quotient,
thence found, are 8, 9. These, multiplied by five and abraded by their re-
spective divisors, give 10, 11. So in every [similar] case.
Of this method of investigation great use is made in the computation of
planets.' On that account something is here said [by way of instance.]
72. Let the remainder of seconds be made the subtractive quantity, sixty
the dividend, and terrestrial days the divisor. The quotient deduced there-
from will be the seconds; and the multiplier will be the remainder of mi-
nutes. From this again the minutes and remainder of degrees are found:
and so on upwards. In like manner, from the remainder of exceeding
months and deficient days, may be found the solar and lunar days.*
' It is less employed in popular questions, where the dividend and divisor are variable. But,
in astronomy, where additive or subtractive quantities vary, while the dividend and divisor are con-
stant, this method is in frequent use. See Crishn.
* By the rule for finding the place of a planet {Siromadi, § .50) the whole number of elapsed days,
multiplied by the revolutions in the great period calpa, and divided by the number of terrestrial
days in a. calpa, gives the past revolutions: the residue is the remainder of revolutions; which, mul-
tiplied by twelve and divided by terrestrial days in a calpa, gives the signs: the balance is remain-
der of signs; and multiplied by thirty, and divided by terrestrial days, gives the degrees: the over-
plus is remainder of degrees ; and multiplied by sixty, and divided by terrestrial days, gives minutes:
the surplus is remainder of minutes ; and this again, multiplied by sixty, and divided by terrestrial
days, gives seconds; and what remains is residue of seconds. Now, by inversion, to find the pla-
net's place from the remainder of seconds: if the remainder of seconds be deducted from the
remainder of minutes multiplied by sixty, then the difference divided by terrestrial days will yield
no residue : but the remaiiider of minutes being unknown, its multiple by sixty is so a fortiori:
however, remainder of minutes multiplied by sixty, and sixty multiplied by remainder of minutes,
are equal; for there is no difference whether quantities be multiplicator or multiplicand to each
other. Therefore sixty, multiplied by remainder of minutes, and having remainder of seconds sub-
tracted from the product, will be exactly divisible by terrestrial days without residue; and the
quotient will be seconds. Now, in the problem, sixty and the remainder of seconds [as also the
terrestrial days in a calpa] are known : and thence to find the remainder of minutes, a multiplier is
to be sought, such that sixty being multiplied by it, and the subtractive quantity (remainder of se-
conds) being taken from the product, the difference may be divisible by terrestrial days without
residue; and this precisely is matter for iuvestigation of (cuiiaca) the pulverizing multiplier.
168 VrJA-GAN'ITA. Chapter II.
The finding of the [place of the] planet and the elapsed days, from the
remainder of seconds in the planet's place, is thus shown. It is as follows.
Sixty is there made the dividend; terrestrial days, the divisor; and the re-
mainder of seconds, the subtractive quantity : with which the multiplier and
quotient are to be found. The quotient will be seconds; and the multiplier,
the remainder of minutes. From this remainder of minutes taken [as the
subtractive quantity] the quotient deduced will be minutes; and the multi-
plier, the remainder of degrees. The residue of degrees is next the subtrac-
tive quantity; terrestrial days, the divisor; and thirty, the dividend: the
quotient will be degrees; and the multiplier, the remainder of signs. Then
twelve is made the dividend; terrestrial days, the divisor; and the remainder
of signs, the subtractive quantity : the quotient will be signs; and the multi-
plier, the remainder of revolutions. Lastly, the revolutions in a calpa become
the dividend; terrestrial days, the divisor; and the remainder of revolutions,
the subtractive quantity : the quotient will be the elapsed revolutions; and
the multiplier, the number of elapsed days. Examples of this occur [in the
Siromam] in the chapter of the [three] problems.'
In like manner the exceeding months in a calpa are made the dividend;
solar days, the divisor; and the remainder of exceeding months, the subtrac-
tive quantity: the quotient will be the elapsed additional months;' and the
multiplier, the elapsed solar days. So the deficient days in a j/uga" are made
the dividend; lunar days, the divisor; and the remainder of deficient days^
the subtractive quantity: the quotient will be the elapsed fewer days;* and
the multiplier, the elapsed lunar days.
73. Rule for a conjunct pulverizer:' If the divisor be the same, and the
multipliers various [two or more']; then, making the sum of those multi-
' Prasn&'d!hyAya; meaning the Triprasnd'd'hyiya of the astronomical portion of the Siiomaili.
* The excess of lunar above solar months.
* Yuga is here an error of the transcriber for calpa; or has been introduced by the author to
intimate, that the method is not restricted to time calculated by the calpa, but also applicable
when the calculation is by the yvga or any other astronomical period. Cri'shn,
This reading, however, does not occur in copies of the LiMrati, though it do in all collated one*
of the Vija-ganita : nor is it noticed by the commentators of the LiUvati,
* Difference between elapsed lunar and terrestrial days.
* See LU&vati, § 265.
* Crishn. on Vij. and Gan. on Lil,
CONJUNCT PULVERIZER. 169
pliers the dividend, and the sum of the remainders a single remainder ; and
applying the foregoing method of investigation, the precise multiplier so
found' is denominated a conjunct one.
74. Example. What quantity is it, which multiplied by five, and di-
vided by sixty-three, gives a residue of seven; and the same multiplied by
ten and divided by sixty-three, a remainder of fourteen ? declare the number.
Here the sum of the multipliers is made the dividend; and the sum of the
residues, a subtractive quantity; and the statement is Divd. 15 o i . . „,
D£.rt oUDtiaC. J! 1 •
ivr. 63
Proceeding as before, the multiplier is found 14. It is precisely the num-
ber required.
' As, putting the multiplicand for dividend, the multiplier is found by the investigation which
is the subject of this chapter; so, making the multiplicator dividend, the multiplier found by the
investigation is multiplicand, in like manner as sixty is made dividend, in the foregoing instance
(§ 72). Then, as the given quantity, being lessened by subtraction of an amount equal to the resi-
due of the division of it by the divisor after multiplication by one of the multiplicators, becomes
exactly divisible; so, by parity of reasoning, it docs, when lessened by the subtraction of the
respective remainders, which the whole number yields, being severally multiplied by the rest of the
multiplicators and divided by the divisor. And generally, if the divisor be the same, then, as the
quantity, severally multiplied by the multiplicators and lessened by the respective remainders,
becomes exactly divisible by the divisor ; so it does, when, being severally multiplied, the multi-
ples are added together and the sum is lessened by the aggregate of remainders. Now the quantity
multiplied by the sum of the multiplicators is the same as if severally multiplied by the multipli-
cators and the multiples then added together. Therefore the sum of the multiplicators is taken
for a multiplicator [and employed as a dividend ;] and the aggregate of the remainders is received
for a remiiinder [and employed as subtractive or additive.] Crisiin.
CHAPTER III.
AFFECTED SQUARE.'
SECTION I.
75 — 81. Six and a half stanzas. Rules for investigating the square-
root of a quantity with additive unity : Let a number be assumed, and
be termed the " least" root.^ That number, which, added to, or sub-
tracted from, the product of its square by the given coefficient,'' makes
the sum (or difference) give a square-root, mathematicians denominate
' Varga-pracrtli or Criti-pracrtti ; from varga or crtti, square, and pracrHii, nature or principle.
' This branch of computation is so denominated, either because the square o[ y&vat or of another
symbol is (pracrtti) the subject of computation ; or because the calculus is concerned with the
number which is (pracriti) the subject affecting the square of ^a or other symbol. The number,
that is (pracriti) the subject in respect of such square, is intended by the term. It is the mul-
tiplier of the square of the unknown: and therefore, in this investigation of a root, the multiplier
of the square is signified by the word pracriti.' Crisii^.
See § 185; the author's own comment on that and on § 187 and § 171. In one place ;»racrKi
is applied by him to the square affected by the coefficient ; in the other it is declared to intend the
coefficient affecting the square. The commentator Su'ryada'sa interprets it in the first sense
(note on § 195) ; and Crishn'a, in the latter. (Vide supra).
' The method here taught subserves the solution of certain problems producing quadratic equa-
tions that involve more than one unknown term.' Crishn.
* Hras-uia, canisM'ha, or laghu, (mdla;) the "least" root; so denominated with reference to
additive quantities, though it may exceed the other root, when the quantity is subtractive (a ne-
gative additive) and is comparatively large. See Crishn.
* Pracriti or guna ; the given coefficient (anca) and multiplier (guiiaj affecting the square.
See a preceding note, and Chap. 7.
Section I. A F FECTE D SQUARE. I71
a positive or a negative additive ;* and they call that root the " greatest"
one."
76. Having set down the " least" and " greatest" roots and the additive,
and having placed under them the same or others,' in the same order, many
roots are to be deduced from them by composition.* Wherefore their com-
position is propounded.
77. The " greatest" and " least" roots are to be reciprocally multiplied
crosswise ;^ and the sum of the products to be taken for a least root. The
product of the two [original] " least" roots being multiplied by the given
coefficient, and the product of the "greatest" roots being added thereto, the
sum is the corresponding greatest root; and the product of the additives
will be the [new] additive.
78. Or the difference of the products of the multiplication crosswise of
greatest and least roots may be taken for a " least" root : and the difference
between the product of the two [original] least roots multiplied together
and taken into the coefficient, and the product of the greatest roots multi-
plied together, will be the corresponding " greatest" root : and here also the
additive will be the product of the two [original] additives.
79- Let the additive divided by the square of an assumed number, be a
' Cshepa, an additive either positive or negative : a quantify superinduced, either affirmative or
negative, and consequently additive or subtractive. See chap. 2, §53 et passim. Li/, ch. 11,
§ 24S.
* /j/t*^<'Aa, the " greatest" root, contradistinguished from Canisht'ha, the least root : although
it may in some cases be less, when the cshipaca, or additive, is negative. — Crisun. Provided
this subtractive quantity be large and the coeflicient small.
' That is, other roots for the same coefficient affecting the square. Crishn.
♦ Bhdvand, composition, or making right* by combination. It is twofold : 1st. yoga-bMvand,
or tam&ia-hMvani, composition by the sum of the products (§ 77) ; 2d. antara-bMvani, or visesha-
bMvani, composition by the difference (§ 78). Recourse is had to the first, when large roots are
sought; to the second, when small are required. Crishn.
' Vajrdbhy'ixa, multiplication crosswise or zigzag. From vajra, lightning or the thunderbolt^
and abhyha, reciprocal multiplication. It is oblique multiplication (tiryag-gwiana),
Si/a. and Crishn.
• Shivnt/ati, Md'ha^arM (makes right). Cslann.
z 2
172 VrJA-GAN'ITA. Chapter III.
new additive ; and the roots, divided by that assumed number, will be the
corresponding roots. Or the additive being multiplied [by the square], the
roots must, in like manner, be multiplied [by the number put].
80 — 81. Or divide the double of an assumed number by the difference
between the square of that assumed number and the given coefficient; and
let the quotient be taken for the " least" root, when one is the additive
quantity ; and from that find tlie " greatest" root. Here [the solutions are]
infinite, as well from [variety of] assumptions, as from [diversity of] com-
position.'
' The principle of the first rule (§ 75,) as observed by the commentator Cri'shna-bhat'ta, is
too evident to require demonstration. That of § 79 is used by him in demonstrating the others,
and is thus given : A square, multiplied or divided by a square, yields still a square. If both
sides of the equation (L*. coefT. + A = G') be multiplied or divided by the square of any assumed
number, equality continues. Now, as the squares of the " leant" and " greatest" roots are here
multiplied by the square of the assumed number, the factor of those roots themselves will be the
simple number put.
The demonstration of § 77, which is given in words at length, joined with a cumbrous notation
of the algebraical expressions, may be thus abridged : To distinguish the two sets, let L, G and A
represent one set; 1, g and a the other; and C the given coefficient.* Then, under §79. putting
g for the assumed number, another set is deduced from the first, L.g.G.g, A.g'. Whence C.L'.g*+
A.g'=G'.g'. Substitute for g' its value C.l'+a ; and the additive A.g' becomes A.Cl.'+A.a;
and, substituting in the first term for A its value G'—C.L', it becomes CGM'— C'.L.''l' + A.a.
Hence the equation C.L'.g' + C.GM' — C'.LM'+A.a=G'.g'; whence, transposing the negative
term and adding or subtracting SC.L.G.l.g; the result is C.(L.g4-l.G)'+A,a=(G.g+C.L.l)'. See
§78.
The concluding rule § 80 — 81 is thus proved by the same commentator: ' Twice an assumed
number being put for the " least" root (§ 75) its square is four limes the square of that assumed
number. The point is to find a quantity such, that being added to this quadruple square taken
into the given coefficient, the sum may be a square. Now the difference between the square of
the sum of two quantities and four times their product is the square of their difference. Therefore
four times the square of the assumed number, multiplied by the given coefficient, and added to
the square of the difference [between the square of the assumed number and the coefficient,] must
of course give a square-root. Thus the " least" root is twice the number assumed ; and the addi-
tive quantity is the square of the difference between the square of the assumed number and the
coefficient. But, by the condition of the problem, the additive quantity must be unity. Divide
therefore, under § 70, by the square of the difference, at the same time dividing the root by the
simple difference between the square of the assumed number and the given coefficient.' Cri'shn.
• Ckishka-biiatta puts the aymbols pro, i ca, djyi, i csh(, dwi en, dwijyi, and diet ctlii, initial syllables of pnicn»i
^aefficient afiecting the square, idya first and dtnittya second, ctmiiht'ha least, JyftAl'/io greatest (root) and ahifa addit'ive.
Section I. AFFECTED SQUARE. 173
82. Example. What square, multiplied by eight, and having one
added to the product, will be a square? Declare it, mathematician! Or
what square, multiplied by eleven, and having one added to the product,
will be a square, my friend ?
Statement on Example 1st: C 8 A 1.
Here putting unity for the assumed " least" root, the " greatest" root is
three, and additive one. Statement of them for composition :
C 8 L 1 G 3 A 1
11 g 3 a 1
By the rule [§ 77] the first " least" root 1, multiplied by the second
" greatest" root 3, gives the product 3. The second " least" root, by the
first " greatest," gives the like product. Their sum is 6. Let this be the
" least" root. The product of the two "less" roots 1, being multiplied by
the given coefficient 8, and added to the product of the two " greater"
roots 9, makes 17- This will be the " greater" root. The product of the
additives will be the additive 1.
Statement of the former roots and additive, with these, for composition :
C 8 L 1 G 3 A 1
1 6 g 17 a 1
Here, by composition, the roots are found L 35 G 99 A 1 ; and so on,
indefinitely, by means of composition.
Statement on Example 2d : Putting unity for the assumed " least," and
subtracting two from the square of that multiplied by the given coefficient
11, the "greater" root is 3. Hence the statement for composition is
C 11 L 1 G 3 A 2
1 1 g 3 a 'i
Proceeding as before, the roots for additive 4 are L6 G 20 A 4.
Then, by the rule § 79j putting two for the assumed number, the roots for
unity additive are found L 3 G 10 A 1. Hence, by composition of like
sets,' the " least" and " greatest" roots are found Z 60 G 199 ^ 1- In like
manner, an indefinite number of roots may be deduced.
' TUya-bha-rana ; the combining of like sets. Whatever may have been the additive quantity
lirst found, and whether it were positive or negative, the combination of lil<e sets raises the addi-
tive to a square; and then, under § 79, assuming a number equal to the root of that square, and
dividing the additive by that square, the additive is reduced to unity, and the roots answering to
it are found by division.
174 VI'JA-GAN'ITA. Chaptek III.
Or, putting unity for the " least" root, the two roots for additive five are
found L 1 G 4 A 5. Whence, by composition of like sets, L 8 G 27
A 25. From this, by § 79, putting five for the assumed number, the roots
for additive unity are found L f G ^ A I.
Statement of these with the preceding, for composition: L3 G 10 Al
1 f g V a 1
From composition by the sum, roots are deduced L 'f^ G *f * A 1.
Or, under rule § 78 ; from composition by the difference, they come out
L -^ Gf A \. And so on, in numerous ways.
The roots for unity as the additive, may be found by another process, un-
der § 80. Here, putting three for the assumed number, and proceeding as
directed, the " least" root comes out 6. Viz. assumed number 3. Its square
9. Given cocfl^cient 8. Their difference 1. Twice the assumed number
6, divided by that difference, is 6; the " least" root: L 6. Its square 36;
multiplied by the given coefficient 8, is 288 ; which, with one added, be-
comes 289 ; the root of which is 17, the "greatest" root: G 17-
So, in the second example likewise, putting three for the assumed num-
ber, and proceeding as directed, the roots are found ; L3 G 10 A 1.
Thus, by virtue of [a variety of] assumptions, and by composition either
by sum or diiference, an infinity of roots may be found.*
' A variety of additives is also found: but it is not noticed, because the problem is restricted to
additive unity. Crisun.
( 175 )
SECTION II.
83 — S6. Rule for the cyclic method:^ (completion of stanza 81, three
stanzas, and half another.) Making the " least" and " greatest" roots and ad-
ditive,^ a dividend, additive and divisor, let the multiplier be thence
found.' The square of that multiplier being subtracted from the given co-
efficient, or this coefficient being subtracted from that square, (so as the re-
mainder be small;*) the remainder, divided by the original additive, is anew
additive; which is reversed if the subtraction be [of the square] from the
coefficient.' The quotient corresponding to the multiplier [and found with
it] will be the " least" root : whence the " greatest" root may be deduced-.*
With these, the operation is repeated, setting aside the former roots and ad-
ditive. This method mathematicians call that of the circle. Thus are in-
tegral roots found with four, two, or one [or other number,^ for] additive :
' Chacrac6la, a circle; especially the horizon. The method is so denominated because it pro-
ceeds as in a circle: finding from the roots (" greatest" and " least") a multiplier and a quotient
(by Chapter 2); and thence new roots; whence again a multiplier and a quotient, and roots from
them; and so on in a continued round. Sur.
* Previously found by § 75. Crishn.
' By the method of the pulverizer (cuttaca). Ch. 2.
* If the coefficient exceed the square of the multiplier, subtract this from the coefficient; but,
if the coefficient be least, subtract it from the square : but so, as either way the residue be small.
— Sur. Else another multiplier is to be sought, by Ch. 2.
' If the square of the multiplier were subtracted from the coefficient, the sign of the new addi-
tive is reversed : if affirmative, it becomes negative ; if negative, it is changed to positive.
Sur. and Crishn.
* It is deduced from the " least" root and additive by the conditions of the problem : or, if re-
quired, without the extraction of a root, by this following rule. ' The original " greatest" root,
multiplied by the multiplier, is added to the " least" root multiplied by the given coefficient; and
the sum is divided by the additive.' Crishn'.
^ With four, two or one, additive or sv.btractive ; or w ith some other number. Crishn.
176 VI'JA-GAN'ITA. Chapter III.
and composition serves to deduce roots for additive unity, from those which
answer to the additives four and two [or other numher.] '■
87- Example : What is the square, which, being multiplied by sixty-
seven, and one being added to the product, will yield a square-root r and
•what is that, which multiplied by sixty-one, with unity added to the pro-
duct, will do so likewise? Declare it, friend, if the method of the affected
square be thoroughly spread, like a creeper,* over thy mind.
Statement of Example 1st: (Putting unity for the " least" root, and ne-
gative three for the additive.) C 67 L 1 G 8 A3.
Making the " least" root the dividend, the " greatest" root the additive,
and the additive the divisor, the statement for the operation of fmding the
multiplier (Ch. 2) is Dividend 1 Additive 8
Divisor 3
Here, by the rule § 61, the series is 0; and the quotient and multiplier
I
are found ; which, as the number of quotients [in the series] is uneven,
2
must be subtracted from the abraders (§• 57) leaving 1 ; and the quotient
1
obtained in the abrading of the additive is to be added (§ 61) to the quo-
tient here found ; making the quotient and multiplier 3 Since the divisor
1
is negative, the quotient is considered so too (§ 68) ; and the quotient and
multiplier are 3 Then the square of the multiplier 1, being subtracted from
1
the given coefficient 67, leaves 66 ; which, however, is not a small remainder.
Putting therefore negative two for the assumed number by § 64, and mul-
tiplying by that the negative divisor 3, and adding the product to the mul-
tiplier, a new multiplier is found : viz. 7- Its square 49 being subtracted
' If the additive be already a square integer, the problem of finding the roots that answer to
additive unity is at once solved by § 79- Else raise it to a square by the combination of like sets,
and then proceed by that rule. If the roots so found be not integral, repeat the method of th«
circle, until the roots come out in whole numbers. Crisiin.
• As a climbing plant spreads over a tree.
Section II. AFFECTED SQUARE. 177
from the coefficient 67, the remainder 1 8, divided by the original additive
3, yields 6 ; the sign of which is reversed, as the subtraction was of the
square of the multiplier from the coefficient; and it thus becomes 6 positive.
The quotient answering to the multiplier, viz. 5,* is the " least" root.
Whether this be negative or affirmative, makes no difference in the further
operation. It is noted then as 5 positive. Its square being multiplied by
the coefficient, and six being added to the product, and the square-root
being extracted, the " greater" root comes out 4 1 .
Statement of these again for a further investigation of a pulverizer:
Dividends ajiv a^
T-.- • ^ Additive 41.
Divisor o
Here the multiplier is found, 5. Its square, subtracted from the coeffi-
cient, leaves 42 ; which, divided by the original additive 6, yields 7; the
sign whereof is reversed because the subtraction was from the coefficient ;
and the new additive comes out 7. The quotient answering to the multi-
plier is the " least" root, 1 1. Hence the " greatest" root is deduced, 90.
Statement of these again for a further pulverizer: Divd. 11 « , . „„
Div. 7
By the rule § 61, the abraded additive becomes 6, and the multiplier is
found 5 ; and, since the products in the series are uneven, it is subtracted
from its abrader, and the multiplier becomes 2. Its negative divisor (the
former additive) being negative (7) is multiplied by negative one (1) as-
sumed by § 64 and added to that multiplier, for a new multipHer 9; from
the square of which 81, subtracting the given coefficient 67, the remainder
14, divided by the original additive 7, gives the new additive 2. Tlie quo-
tient answering to the multiplier is the " least" root 27 : whence the " great-
est" root is found 221. From these, others are to be deduced by combina-
tion of like sets.
Statement: L 27 G 221 A 2
1 27 g 221 a 2
Proceeding as directed, the roots are found L 1 1934 G 97684 A 4.
* — 3+(lX-2).
A A
178 VI'JA-GAN'ITA. Chapter III.
These roots divided by the root of the additive four, viz. 2, give roots which
answer to additive unity : L 5967 G 48842 A 1.
Statement of Example 2d. C 6l Ll G8 A3.
Statement for a pulverizer: Dividend! ^^^■^■ o
'^ T\- ■ a Additive 8.
Divisor 3
Proceeding as before, by §61, and putting two for the assumed number
(§ 64) the multipUer is found 7. Whence roots, answering to the negative
additive four, are deduced L 5 G 39 A 4. Thence, by § 79, roots are
found for subtractive imity, L f G y A i . Statement of these for com-
position L f G V A i
H g ¥ a i.
From them are deduced roots answering to additive unity L ^^^ G i^
Al.
Statement of these again, with roots answering to subtractive unity, for
composition L -| G ^j A 1
liM ^ i^ a 1
Hence integral roots answering to subtractive unity are obtained L 3805
G 29718 A 1. From these, by combining like sets, roots for additr\'e
unity come out (in whole numbers) L 226153980 G 1766319049 A 1.
( m )
SECTION III.
MISCELLANEOUS RULES.
88 — 89/ Rule :- If the multiplier [that is, coefficient affecting the
square] be not the sum of [two] squares, when unity is subtractive, the in-
stance proposed is imperfect.* The instance being correctly put, let unity
twice set down be divided by the roots of the [component] squares : and
the quotients be taken as two " least" roots answering to subtractive unity :*
' Conclusion of a preceding stanza § 86; one complete stanza; and beginning of another.
* Where unity is subtractive, to discriminate impossible cases; and to solve the problem by
another method, in those which are possible. Crishn'.
' Undeserving of regard.— Sua. The square of no number multiplied by such a coefficient, can,
after subtraction of unity, be an exact square. CaiSHV.
The subtractive unity is a square number. Now a negative additive may be a square number
if the square of the " least" root being multiplied by the coefficient comprise two squares; for
then, one square being subtracted, the other remains to yield a square-root. But, for this end, it
is necessary that the coefficient should have consisted of the sum of two squares ; for, as a square
multiplied by a square is a square, the square of the " least" root being multiplied by the two
square component portions of the coefficient, the two multiples will be squares and component
portions of the product. Cri'shn.
In explanation of the principle of this rule, Su'ryada'sa cites a maxim, that taking contiguous
arithmeticals, or next following terms in arithmetical progression increasing by unity, twice the
sum of the squares less one will be a square number.
♦ The square of a " least" root, [putting any number for the root at pleasure;] multiplied by
either component square portion of the coefficient, will answer for a negative additive : for, the
square of the " least" root being severally multiplied by the squares of which the sum is the co-
efficient, the two products added together are the square of the " least" root multiplied by the
coefficient; and, if from that be subtracted the square of the same multiplied by either portion of
the coefficient, the remainder will be the square of the same multiplied by the other square por-
tion of the coefficient; and of course will yield a square-root. Now to deduce from this, roots
answering to subtractive unity ; put for the assumed number by § 79 the " least" root [any how
assumed as above] multiplied by the root of either component square portion of the coefficient, and
A .\ 2
180
VI'JA-G ANITA. Chapter III.
and the correspondent " greatest" roots may thence be deduced. Or two
roots serving for subtractive unity may be found in the manner before
shown.
90. Example. Say what square, being multiplied by thirteen, with one
subtracted from the product, will be a square number? Or what square,
beino- multiplied by eight, with one taken from the product, will yield a
root ?
In the first of these instances, the coefficient is the sum of the squares of
two and three. Therefore let unity divided by two be a " least" root for
subtractive unity, -a-. From the square of that, multiplied by the coefficient,
and diminished by the subtraction of unity, the corresponding " greatest"
root is deduced, ^. Or let unity divided by three be the " least" root, -l.
Hence the " greatest" root is found -5 . Or let the " least" root be 1 ; from
the square of which, multiplied by the coefficient, and diminished by the
subtraction of four, the " greatest" root comes out 3. Statement of them,
in their order, L 1 G 3 A 4. By the rule § 79, roots answering to sub-
tractive unity are hence found ^ f . Or subtracting nine from the square
of the " least" root multiplied by the coefficient, the " greatest" root comes
out: and roots are thence found [by § 75 — 79] Li G^ A 1. Or by the
cyclic method (§ 83 — 86) integral roots may be deduced. Thus, putting
those " least" and "greatest" roots and additive (§83) for the dividend,
additive and divisor, Dividend ^ Additive a- *"^ reducing them by the
Divisor 1
common measure half. Dividend 1 Additive 3 *'^^ multiplier and quo-
Divisor 2
tient are found by investigation of the pulverizer (Ch. 2), 1 and 2. Here
putting negative unity for an assumed number, and adding its multiple of
the divisor to the multiplier, another multiplier is obtained, 3. Whence, by
the rule (§ 84), the additive comes out 4 ; and the quotient found with the
proceeding by tliat rule, §79, the root answering to subtractive unity will be the " least" root [be-
fore assumed] divided by the present assumed number, which is the same " least" root multiplied
. by the root of a component portion of the coefficient. Reduce the numerator and denominator of
this fractional value to their least terms by their common measure, the " least" root [before
assumed] ; the result is, for numerator, unity ; for denominator, the root of the component square
portion of the coefficient. Crishn.
Section III. AFFECTED SQUARE. 181
multiplier, becomes the " least" root 3 ; and from these the " greatest" root
is deduced, 11. Hence also, by repeating the cyclic operation (§ 83 — 84),
integral roots for subtractive unity are found, L 5 G 1 8 A 1. Here, as
in every instance, an infinity of roots may be deduced by composition with
roots answering to unity.
In like manner, in the second example, where the given coefficient is
eight, the " least" and "greatest" roots, found as above, are Li G 1 A 1.*
91. Example: What square, being multiplied by six, and having three
added to it, will be a square number? or having twelve added? or with the
addition of seventy-five ? or with that of three hundred ?
Here, putting unity for the " least" root, the statement is C 6 L 1 G 3
A 3. Then, by rule § 79, multiplying the roots by two, [and the additive
by its square four,] the roots answering for additive twelve come out L 2
G 6 A 12. So, by the same rule, multiplying by five, [and the additive by
twenty-five,] they are found for additive seventy-five, L5 G 15 A 75.
Also, multiplying by ten, [and the additive by a hundred,] they are de-
duced for additive three hundred, L 10 G 30 A 300.
92." Many being either additive or subtractive, corresponding roots may
be found [variously] according to the [operator's] own judgment : and from
them an infinity may be deduced, by composition with roots answering to
additive unity.'
93. Rule:* The multiplier [i.e. coefficient] being divided by a square,
[and the roots answering to the abridged coefficient being thence found,']
divide the " least" root by the root of that square.*
* Roots in whole numbers may be hence deduced by the cyclic method, § 83—86. Crishn.
* Completion of one stanza § 89 and half of another.
' The preceding rule was unrestrictive. Finding by whatever means roots which answer for the
proposed additive, an infinity of them is afterwards thence deducible by composition with additive
unity and its correspondent roots : as the author here shows. Crishji'.
* Applicable when the coefficient is measured by a square. Crisiin.
' Crisiin.
' By parity, multiplying by any square the given coefficient, and finding the " least" and
" greatest" roots for such raised coefficient, the " least" root so found must be multiplied by the
root of that square. Crishk.
iSi VI'JA-GANITA. Chapter III.
Si. Example : half a stanza. Say what square being multipUed by
thirty-two, with one added to tlie product, will yield a square-root ?
Statement : C 32. The " least" and " greatest" roots, found as before,
are L J- G 3 A 1. Or, by the present rule ^93, the coefficient 32 divided
by four, gives 8; to which the roots corresponding are found L 1 G 3 A 1 ;
and dividing the "least" root by the root (2) of the square (4-) by which the
coefficient was divided, the two toots for the coefficient thirty-two, come
out Ll G3 A 1.
Or, dividing the coefficient by sixteen, it gives 2 ; to which the roots
corresponding are L 2 G 3 A 1 ; whence, dividing the " least" root by the
square-root (4) of the divisor (16), the roots answering to the entire coeffi-
cient are deduced La G 3 A 1 .
Or, by the investigation of a pulverizer (Ch. 2) integral roots are obtained
(§ 83—86). L3 G 17 A 1.
95. Rule :* The additive," divided by an assumed quantity, is twice set
down, and the assumed quantity is subtracted in one instance, and added
in the other : each is halved ; and the first is divided by the square-root of
the multiplier [that is, coefficient.] The results are the "least" and
" greatest" roots in their order.^
' Applicable when the coefficient is a square number. Ciushn.
* The rule holds equally for a subtractive quantity : but with this difference, that the subtrac-
tion and addition of the number put are transposed to yield the " least" and " greatest" roots in
their order. Or the rule may be applied as it stands, observing to give the negative sign to the
additive : but the " least" and " greatest" roots will in this manner come out negative. It is, there-
fore, preferable to transpose the operations of subtraction and addition of the assumed number.
Crishv.
' The square of the " least" root being multiplied by a coefficient which also is a square, the
product will be a square number. The additive being added, if the sum too be a square, [square
of the " greatest" root ;] the additive must be the difference of the squares. Now the difference
of two squares, divided by the difference of the two simple quantities, will be their sura. Hence,
putting any assumed number for the difference, and dividing by it the additive equal to the differ-
ence of the squares, the quotient is the sum of the two quantities. Then, by the rule of concur-
rence (Li/. § 55), the finding of the two quantities is easy. The one is the " greatest" root ; the
other is the " least" root taken into the root of the coefficient. Therefore, by inversion, that
quantity, divided by the root of the coefficient, will be the " least" root. Sua, and Chishn.
Section III. AFFECTED SQUARE. 183
96. Example: What square, being multiplied by nine, and having
fifty-two added to the product, will be square? or what square number, being
multiplied by four, and having thirty-three added, will be square?
Here, in the first example, the additive fifty-two being divided by an
assumed number two, and the quotient set down twice, diminished and in-
creased by the assumed number and then halved, gives 12 and 14. The first
of these is divided by the square-root of the given coefficient; and the
"least" and "greatest" roots are found, L 4 G 14.
Or dividing the additive 32 by four, they thus come out L|^ G t/-
In the second example, dividing the additive thirty-three by one put for
the assumed number, the "least" and " greatest" roots are in like manner
deduced, L8 G 17. Or, putting three, they are L 2 G 7- ^
97- Example :* Declare what square multiplied by thirteen, and lessened
by subtraction of thirteen, or increased by addition of the same number,
will be a square ?
In the first example, coefficient 13. The "least" and "greatest" roots
found [for the subtractive quantity] are L 1 GO. Put an assumed number
3; and, by rule § 80 — 81, roots answering for additive unity are found L-f-
G y. From these, by composition, roots answering to the negative addi-
tive thirteen are deduced L y G *^. From which roots, corresponding
to the negative additive, together with these other roots L ^ G -| answer-
ing to subtractive unity, by the method of composition by difference, roots
suited to additive thirteen are obtained L f G y. Or by composition by
sum, they come out L 1 8 G 65.
98. Example:* Say what square, multiplied by negative five, with
twenty-one added to the product, will be a square number ? if thou know
the method for a negative coefficient.
Statement: C 5 A 21.
Here, putting one, the roots are 1 and 4. Or putting two, they are 2 and I .
' Thus, by varying the assumptions, an infinity of results may be obtained. Cri'siin.
■* To elucidate the case when the additive equals the coefficient. Crishn.
' Showing, that roots may be found, even in cases where the coefficient is negative. CafsHN.
184 VI'JA-GAN'ITA. Chapter III.
By composition with roots adapted to negative unity, an infinity may
be deduced.
99. This computation, truly applicable to algebraic investigation, has
been briefly set forth. Next I will propound algebrq, affording gratification
to mathematicians.*
' By tbis conclusion k is intimated, that the contents of the preceding chapters (1 — 3) are in-
troductory to the analysis, which the author proposed as the subject in the opening of the treatise
(^ 2); and to which he now proceeds in the next chapters (4 — 8). See Su'r. and CRfsuN.
CHAPTER IV.
SIMPLE EQUATIONS
100 — 102. Rule: Let "so much as" (yavat-tctcat}* be put for the
value of the unknown quantity ;' and doing with that precisely what is pro-
posed in the instance, let two equal sides be carefully completed, adding
or subtracting, multiplying or dividing,* [as the case may require.]
101. Subtract the unknown quantity of one side from that of the other;
and the known number of the one from that of the other side. Then by the
remaining unknown divide the remainder of the known quantity : the quo-
tient is the distinct value of the unknown quantity.'
' Eca-varna-samicarana, equation uniliteral or involving a single unknown quantity. See
note 2 in next pagel
* See§ 17.
' Avyada-r&si, indistinct quantity or unknown number (ajny&tanca) ; the unknown is repre-
sented by ydvat-tdvaf ; or, if there be more than one, by colours or letters (§ 17) ; the known, by
rupa, form, species, (absolute number.) See Sua.
* Or by multiplying and adding; or by multiplying and subtracting; by dividing and adding;
or by dividing and subtracting ; or by raising to a square or other [power]. Crishn.
This first rule is common to all algebraic analysis. lb.
' Whatever be the unknown quantity (whether unit or aggregate of the known, or a part or
fraction of such unit or aggregate,) is yet not specifically known. It is therefore denominated in-
distinct or unknown ; while that, which is specifically known, is termed distinct or known species.
The operations indicated by the enunciation of the example being performed with the designation
of the unknown, if by any means, conforniably with the tenor of the instance, there at once be
equality of the two sides, a value of the unknown in the known species is easily deducible. Thus,
if on one side, there be only known number, and on the other side the unknown quantity only,
then, as being equal, those numbers are a true value in the known, of that amount of the un-
known. Hence, by rule of three, the quantity sought is found : viz. ' of so many unknown
B B
18(J VI'JA-GAN'ITA. Chapter IV.
102. Under this head, for two or more unknown quantities also, [the al-
gebraist] may put, according to his own judgment, multiples or fractions of
"so much as," (that is, yavat-tavat, multiplied by two, &c. or divided ;) or
the same with addition or deduction [of known quantities.] Or in some
cases he may assume a known value ; with due attention likewise [to the
problem.]
V The first analysis is an equation involving a single colour (or letter).*
The second mode of analysis is an etjuation involving more than one colour
(or letter).* Where the equation comprises one, two or more colours, raised
(y&vat-tavat) if so many known (rupa) be the value, then of the proposed number of unknown,
what is the value ?' But, shoultl there be on both sides some terms of each sort,, it must be so
managed, that on one side there be only terms of the unknown ; and on the other, of the known.
Now it is a maxim, that, if equal [things] be added to, or subtracted from, or multiply, or divide,
equal [things], the equality is not destroyed : as is clear. If then, from one side, the terms of
the unknown contained in it be subtracted, there remain only known numbers on that side : but,
for equality's sake, the like amount of unknown must be subtracted from the other side. The same
is to be done in regard to the known number on one side, which must be subtracted also from the
other. This being effected, there remain only terms of the unknown on one side ; and of the
known on the other. Then, by rule of three, ' if by this unknown quantity this known number
be had, then by the stated amount of the unknown what is obtained?' the remaining known term
is to be divided by the residue of the unknown and to be multiplied by the proposed unknown.
The one operation (that of division) is directed by the rule (§ 101); the other (the multiplication)
is comprehended in (utt'hupaaa) the " raising" of the answer;* both being reduced to proportions
in which one term is unity. Therefore, by any means, (by subtraction or some other,) the twa
sides of the equation are to be so treated, consistently, however, with their equality, as that
known number may be on one side, and unknown quantity on the other. Else the solution will
not be easy. Crishn,
' Or symbol of unknown quantity.
* Sam'icarana, sam'icdra, samicriya, equation : from sama, equal, and cri, to do : a making equal.
It consists of two sides (pacsha) ; and each may comprise several terms (c'handa, lit. part).
The primary distinction of analysis (V'tja) is twofold ; 1st. uniliteral or equation involving one
unknown, eca-varna-samicarana ; where, a single unknown quantity designated by letter or colour
(§ 17) being premised, two sides are equated ; 2d. multiliteral or equation involving several un-
known, aneca-vania-samicararia, where, more than one unknown quantity represented severally by
colours or letters being premised, two sides are equated. The first comprises two, and the second
three sorts: viz. 1st. equation involving a single and simple unknown quantity ; 2d. equation in-
volving a single unknown raised to a square or higher power; 3d. equation involving several simple
unknown quantities ; 4th. equation involving several unknown raised to the square or higher
power; 5th. equation involving products of two or more unknown quantities multiplied together.
-■ij
* Deducing of the answer by subsUtution oi value. See note 1, p. 188. and glow on $ lo3 — 156.
SIMPLE EQUATION. 187
to the square or other [power,] it is termed (mad'hyamaharana) elimination
of the middle term. Where it comprises a (bhdvita) product, it is called,
(bharita) involving product of unknown quantities. Thus teachers of the
science pronounce analysis fourfold.
The first of these is so fer explained : an example being proposed by the
questioner, the value of the unknown quantity should be put once, twice,
or other multiple of " so much as" (ydvat-tavat) : and on that unknown
quantity so designated, every operation, as implied by the tenor of the in-
stance,^ whether multiplication, division, rule of three, [summing of] pro-
gression, or [measure of] plane figure, is to be performed by the calculator.
Having so done, he is diligently to make the two sides equal. If they be
not so in the simple enunciation [of the problem] ; they must be rendered
equal by adding something to either side, or subtracting from it, or multi-
plying by some quantity or dividing.- Then the unknown quantity of one
of the two sides is to be subtracted from the unknown of the other side ; and,
in hke manner, the square or other [power] of the unknown. The known
numbers of one side are to be likewise subtracted from the known numbers
of the other.' If there be surds, they too must be subtracted by the method
before taught.* Then, by the residue of the unknown quantity, dividing
These distinctions are reducible to four, by uniting the quadratics or equations of higher degree
under one head of analysis ; where, a power (square or other) of an uniinown quantity represented
by colour or letter (or more than one such) being premised, and sides being equated, the value is
found by means of extraction of the root. It is called mod^hi/amd'harana; and is so denominated
because the middle term (mad'hyama c'handa) is generally removed : being derived from mad'hyama,
middlemost, and aharana, removal or elimination. (See Chap. 5.) These four distinctions are
received by former writers :• the author himself, however, intimates his own preference of the
primary distinction alone. Crishit.
* AMpa, enunciation of the pr'tch'haca, or of the person proposing the question ; or tenor of the
instance (uddesaca) ; the condition of the problem.
* By superadding something to the least side ; or subtracting it from the greater ; or multiplying
by it the less side ; or dividing by it the greater. Ckishn.
' The side containing the lowest unknown has the most known ; and conversely. Ordering the
work accordingly, subtract the unknown in the second from that in the first side ; and the known
in the first from that in the second.— Sub. If there be a square or other {power] of the unknown,
that also is to be subtracted from the like term of the other side, CaiSHN.
* Ch. 1. Sect. 4. Though the unknown or its power have a surd multiplier, subtraction must
take place. The residue having still a surd coefficient, divide by that surd the remainder of known
• S«e CiiATjjBviDA on Braiimeodfta, (Brofcm. 12, ^66 and 18, $ 38).
BB 2
[
W8 VIJA-GANITA. Chapter IV.
the remainder of the known numbers, the quotient thus obtained becomes
the value known of one unknown : and thence the proposed unknown quan-
tity instanced is to be " raised." * If in the example there be two or more
unknown quantities comprised," putting for one of them one " so much as",
let " so much as" (ydvat-t&vat) multiplied by two or another assumetl num-
ber, or divided by it, or lessened by some assumed number, or increased by
it, be put for the rest. Or let " so much as" (ydxat-tdvat) be put for one ;
and known values for the others. With due attention : that is, the intelli-
gent calculator, considering how the task may be best accomplished, should
so put known or unknown values of the rest. Such is the meaning.
103 — 104. Examples : One person has three hundred of known species
and six horses. Another has ten horses of like price, but he owes a debt of
one hundred of known species. They are both equally rich. What is the
price of a horse r *
104. If half the wealth of the first, with two added, be equal to the
wealth of the second; or if the first be three times as rich as the other, tell
me in the several cases the value of a horse.*
number whether rational or irrational ; that is, " square by square" (§29); and extract the square-
root of the quotient; which will be the value of the uniinown; or, if the quotient be irrational,
note it as a surd value. So, in deducing an answer from that surd value, " multiply square by
square" (§ 29) and extract the root, or note the surd. Cri'shi/.
' The value of the unknown being thus found in an expression of the known ; the answer of the
question, or quantity sought, is deducibJe from it by the rule of proportion ; and the first term of
the proportion being unity, the operation is a simple multiplication. This finding of the quantity
sought, or answer to the question, being the stated unknown quantity in the instance, is termed
utt'hdpana , a " raising" of it, or substitution of a value. See Ckishn'a; and the author's gloss on
the first rule of Chapter 6.
* Although such examples come of course under equations involving more than one unknown,
the author has introduced the subject for gratification and exercise of the understanding.
— Cri'shn. See Ch. 5.
Reserving one among two or more unknown quantities, if values of the rest, in expressions of
that or of the known species, be assumed either equal or unequal or at pleasure, then, from the
value of the unknown thence found, a true answer for the instance will be deducible. Crishx.
' This is an example of an equation according to the simple enunciation of the instance.
Crishn.
♦ Instances of adding or subtracting, multiplying or dividing, (§ lOO) to produce the equation.
Crisun.
SIMPLE EQUATION. I89
Example 1st: Here the price of a horse is unknown. Its value is put
one " so much as" (ydvat-tavat) ya 1 ; and by rule of three, ' if the price of
one horse be ydvat-tdvat, what is the price of six ?' Statement : 1 | ^^a 1 |
6 \ . The fruit, multiplied by the demand, and divided by the argu-
ment,^ gives the price of six horses, ya 6. Three hundred of known species
being superadded, the wealth of the first person results ; ya 6 ru 300. In
like manner the price of ten horses is ya 10. To this being superadded a
hundred of known species made negative, the wealth of the second person
results; ya 10 ru 100. These two persons are equally rich. The two sides,
therefore, are of themselves become equal. Statement of them for equal
subtraction 3^fl 6 ru 300 Then, by the rule (§ 101), the unknown of the
ya 10 ru 100
first side being subtracted from the unknown of the other, the residue is
ya 4. And the known numbers of the second side being subtracted from
the known numbers of the first, the remainder is 400. The remainder of
known number 400, being divided by the residue of unknown ya 4, the
quotient is the value in known species, of one " so much as" (ydvat-tdvat)
viz. 100. 'If, of one horse, this be the value, then of six what?' By this
proportion the price of six horses is found, 600 ; to which three hundred of
known species being added, the wealth of the first person is found, 900. In
like manner, that of the second also comes out 900.
Example 2d : The funds of the first and second persons are, as before,
these : ya 6 ru 300
ya 10 ru 100 ' -
Here the wealth of the one is equal to half that of the other with two
added ; as is specified in the example. Hence, the capital of the first being
halved and two added to the moiety ; or that of the second less two being
doubled ; the two sides become equal. That being done, the statement for
subtraction is ya 3 ru 152 or ya 6 ru 300 From both of which, sub-
ya \0 ru 100 ya^O ru 204
traction, &c. being made, the value of one " so much as" (ydvat-tdvat) is
found 36. Whence, " raising" as before, the capitals of the two come out
516 and 260.
• Ulaxati, § 70.
igo VI'JA-GAN'ITA. ChapterIV.
Example 3d : The capitals are expressed by the same terms, viz.
ya 6 ru 300
7/a 10 ru 100
The third part of the first person's wealth is equal to the second's ; or
three times the last equals the first. Statement: j/a 6 ru 300 ov ya 2 rw 100
ya 30 ru 300 ya 10 ru 100
By the equation the value of "so much as" (ydvai-tdvat) is found 25.
From which " raising" the answers, the capitals come out 450 and 150.
105. Example:' The quantity of rubies without flaw, sapphires, and
pearls belonging to one person, is five, eight and seven respectively ; the
number of like gems appertaining to another is seven, nine and six : one
has ninety, the other sixty-two, known species. They are equally rich.
Tell me quickly then, intelligent friend, who art conversant with algebra,
the prices of each sort of gem.
Here the unknown quantities being numerous, the [relative] values of the
rubies and the rest are put yaS ya2 yal. ' If of one gem this be the price,
then of the proposed gems what is the price ?' The number of (ydvat-tdvat)
the unknown, found by this proportion, being summed, and ninety being
added, the property of the first person is j/fl 38 ru90. In like manner the
second person's capital is ya 45 ru 62. They are equally rich. Statement
•of the two for equal subtraction ya3% ru 90 Equal subtraction being made,
ya 45 ru 62
the value of the unknown is found 4. " Raising" from it by the proportion
' M o^ one ydvat-tdvat this be the value, then of three (or of two) what?*
the prices of a ruby and the rest are deduced : viz. 12, 8, 4. ' If of one
ruby this be the price, then of five what?' the amount of rubies comes out
60. In like manner sapphires 64 ; pearls 7- Total of these, with the addi-
tion of the absolute number 90, gives the whole capital of the one, 242:
and, in like manner, that of the other, 242.
Or let the value of a ruby be put ya 1 ; and the prices of sapphires and
pearls be p.ut in known species, 5 and 3. ' If of one ydvat-tdvat this be the
pjice, then of five what?' Thus the price of five rubies is found ya 5 ; and
the amount of sapphires and pearls, 40 and 2 1 . The sum of the two, with
' An instance of more than one unknown quantity, and of putting assumed values (§ 102).
Chisiin.
SIMPLE EQUATION. 191
ninety added, is ru 151: In like manner the capital of the second person is
yal ru 125. Statement for equal subtraction ya 5 ra 151 Subtraction
ya 7 ru YIS
being made, tlie value of yavat-tavat comes out 13. Hence by "raising"
the answers, the equal amount of capital is deduced, 216.'
In like manner, by virtue of [a variety of] assumptions, a multiplicity of
answers may be obtained.
106. Example :' One says " give me a hundred, and I shall be twice as
rich as you, friend !" The other replies, " if you deliver ten to me, I shall
be six times as rich as you." Tell me what was the amount of their re-
spective capitals ? J
Here, putting the capital of the first ya 2 ru 100, and that of the second;
ya 1 ru 100 ; the first of these, taking a hundred from the other, is twice as
rich as he is : and thus one of tlie conditions is fulfilled. But taking ten
from the first, the capital of the last with the addition of ten is six times as
great as that of the first : therefore multiplying the first by six, the statement
\?,ya 12 ru 660 Hence by the equation, the value of " so much as" (ydvat-
ya 1 ru 1 10
tdvat) is found, 70. Thence, by " raising" the answer, the original capi-
tals are deduced 40 and 170.'
107. Example :* Eight rubies, ten emeralds and a hundred pearls, which
are in thy ear-ring, my beloved, were purchased by me for thee, at an equal
amount ; and the sum of the rates of the three sorts of gems was three less
than half a hundred : tell me the rate of each, if thou be skilled, auspicious
woman, in this computation.
Here put the equal amount ya 1. Then by the rule of three 'If this be
the price of eight rubies, what is the price of one ?' and, in like manner, [for
the rest,] the rates in the several instances are ya \, ya -^, ya -j-^-o . The sum
of these is equal to forty-seven.
■ See the solution conducted with more than one symbol of unknown quantity. Ch. 6.
* Instance of putting multiples of the unlinown with addition or subtraction of known quanti-
ties (§ 132). — Cri'siin. The question, however, requires no arbitrary assumption.
^ See the solution otherwise managed in Ch. 6.
* This and the following examples are introduced for the gratification of learners. CRfsHN.- ■
P
192 VI'JA-GAN'ITA. Chapter IV.
Statement for like subtraction ya ^Vt ^" ^ Reducing the two sides of
ya ru 47
the equation to a common denomination and dropping the denominator, the
equation gives the value of the unknown (ydvat-tavat) 200. Hence',
" raising" the answer, the rates of the gems are found, rubies at 25 ; eme-
ralds at 20 ; pearls at 2. The ccjual amount of purchase of each sort is 200.
The cost of the gems in the ear-ring 600.
Here, having reduced the terms to a common denomination, and proceed-
ing to subtraction, when the first side of the equation is to be divided by the
other, the numerator and denominator being transposed, the denominator is
both multiplier and divisor of the second side of the equation. Being equal
they destroy each other. Therefore, disappearance of the denominator '
takes place.
108. Example:^ Out of a swarm of bees, one fifth settled on a blossom
of nauclea (cadamba) ; and one third, on a flower of sil'mdhri ; three
times the difference of those numbers flew to the bloom of an echites (cu-
^aja). One bee, which remained, hovered and flew about in the air, allured
at the same moment by the pleasing fragrance of a jasmin and pandanus.
Tell me, charming woman, the number of bees.
Here the number of the swann of bees is put ya 1. Hence the number
of bees gone to the blossom of the nauclea and the rest of the flowers men-
tioned, is j/fl \^. This, with the one specified bee, is equal to the proposed
unknown quantity (ydvat-tdvat). The statement therefore is ya\^ ^"rf
! : ya I ru
Reducing these to a common denomination and dropping the denominator,
the value of the unknown (ydvat-tdvat) is found, as before, 15. This is
the mmibcr of the swarm of bees.
' Ch'heda-gama ; departure, or disappearance, of the denominator. Equal subtraction being
made, when, conformably with the order of proceeding (§ 101), the remainder of known number
is divided by the residue of unknown quantity, the transposition of numerator and denominator
takes place by the rule of division of fractions, (Lil. § 40 J Thus the remainder of known num-
ber is multiplied by the denominator of the unknown in one operation, and divided by it in the
other. Wherefore, the multiplier and divisor, as being equal, are both destroyed. Thus depar-
ture of the denominator takes place. Su'r.
* This example occurs also in the author's treatise of Arithmetic. See LU. § 54.
SIMPLE EQUATION. 193
109. Example; here adduced for an easy solution, though exhibited by
another author ■} Subtracting from a sum lent at five in the hundred, the
square of the interest, the remainder was lent at ten in the hundred. The
time of both loans was alike, and the amount of the interest equal. [Say
what were the principal sums ?]"
Here, if the period be put ydvat-tdvat, the task is not accomplished.
Therefore the time is assumed five months ; and the principal sum is put
ydvat-tavat I. With this, the statement for rule of five' is 1 5 The
100 ya 1
5
interest comes out ya \. Its square, ya v -^, being subtracted from the
principal sum after reducing to a common denominator, the second principal
sum is found ya v ^ ya \^. Here also, for [the interest for] five months,
by the rule of five, the statement is 1 5 Answer : the interest
100 yav^'^ ^fl||
10
is ya V -jV ya a-|- This is equal to the interest before found, namely ya ^.
Reducing the two sides of the equation to their least terms by their com-
mon measure ydvat-tcvcat, the statement of them for equal subtraction is
ya ru \ Proceeding as before,* the value of the unknown ydvat-idvat
ya^ ruW
is found 8. It is the principal sum.
Or else [it may be solved in this following manner.^] The rate of in-
terest for the second loan being divided by the rate of interest for the first,
the quotient is a multiplier, by which the second principal sum being mul-
tiplied will be equal to the first. For, else, how should the interest in equal
times be equal r The multiplier of the second sum is, therefore, in the pre-
sent instance 2. The second sum, multiplied by one, and taken into the
multiplier less one, is equal to the square of the interest. Hence the square
' It has been inserted by certain earlier writers in their treatises ; and is introduced by the
author for a display of his skill in the solution of the problem. It is a mixt one, and solved [as an
indeterminate] by an equation involving one unknown. — SuR. It is cited for the purpose of ex-
hibiting an easy solution. Crishn.
* Crishn.
' To find the interest.— Cri'shn. See L'd. § 79.
♦ That is, reducing to a common denominatiun and dropping the denominator. Cri'shi/.
' Without putting an algebraic symbol for the unknown quantity. CRiSHif .
C C
J94 VI'JA-GAN'ITA. Chapter IV.
of an assumed amount of interest, being divided by the multiplier less one,
the quotient will be the second principal sum : and this, added to the square
of the interest, will be the first sum.' Let the square of the interest then
be put 4. Hence the first and second sums are found 8 and 4, and the in-
terest 2. ' If the interest of a hundred be five, then of eight what ?' By
this proportion the interest of eight for one month comes out f. ' If by this,
one month, by two how many are had ?' The number of months is thus
found, 5.
1 10. Example :' From a sum lent at the interest of one in the hundred,
subtracting the square of the interest, the remainder was put out at five in
• The araouut of interest on a hundred principal at the rate of one per cent, is the same with
that on fifty, at two; on twenty-five, at four; on twenty, at five; and on ten, at ten. Therefore,
by the same number, which multiplying the rate of the first loan raises it to the rate of the second,
the principal of the first being divided equals the second. For how else should unequal principal
sums produce an equal amount of interest in equal times? But the multiplier is the quotient ob-
tained by dividing the rate of the second loan by that of the first. For the first rate is multiplicand;
and the second rate, product. Therefore the second principal, multiplied by the quotient of the
second rate by the first, will be the first rate. But the second principal is not known. A method
of finding it follows. Were it arbitrarily assumed, the first principal would be found from it by
multiplying it by the multiplier, and the amount of interest on the two sums would be equal in
equal times : but the difference will not be equal to the square of the interest ; [another condition
of the problem.] It must be therefore treated differently. The square of the interest being sub-
tracted from the first principal, the remainder is the second ; and conversely the square of the in-
terest added to the second is equal to the first. Consequently, to find the first sum, the second is
to be added to the square of the interest; or it is to be multiplied by the multiplier. The multi-
plication may be by portions : thus, putting unity for one portion of the multiplicator, the other
will be the multiplier less one : and the second principal multiplied by one, added to the second
principal multiplied by the multiplicator less one, or second principal added to the square of the
interest, will be equal to the first principal. That is, the square of the interest is equal to the
second principal multiplied by the multiplicator less one. Hence the square of the interest, being
divided by the multiplier less one, will be the second principal, Though the square of the interest
be not known, it may be had by arbitrary assumption : and thereby the example may be solved
completely. Thus interest being assumed, and its square being divided by the multiplicator less
one, the quotient is the second principal. That, added to the square of the interest, is the first
principal. And, from the principal sum and the amount of the interest, the time is found. And
thus the solution of question is easy without putting (y^vat-t&vat) a symbol for an unknown quan-
tity. Crishn.
- This example is the author's own ; varied but little from the preceding cited one. It is
omitted by Su'ryada'sa, but noticed by Crishx'a, who observes, that it is designed to show the
applicableness of the plain solution just exhibited by the author.
r
\
SIMPLE EQUATION. 195
the hundred. The period of both loans was alike; and the amount of in-
terest equal.
Here the multiplier is 5. The square I6, of an assumed value of the
amount of interest (4) being divided by the multiplier less one, 4, the second
principal sum is found, 4. This being added to the square of the interest,
the first principal sum comes out 20. Hence, by a couple of proportions,*
the time is obtained, 20.
Thus it is rightly solved by the understanding alone : what occasion was
there for putting (yavat-tdvat) a sign of an unknown quantity ? Or the in-
tellect alone is analysis (vija). Accordingly it is observed in the chapter on
Spherics, ' Neither is algebra consisting in symbols, nor are the several sorts
of it, analysis. Sagacity alone is the chief analysis : for vast is inference.'"
111. Example : Four jewellers, possessing respectively eight rubies,
ten sapphires, a hundred pearls and five diamonds, presented, each from his
own stock, one apiece to the others in token of regard and gratification at
meeting : and they thus became owners of stock of precisely equal value.
Tell me, friend, what were the prices of their gems respectively ?^
Here the rule for putting ydvat-tdvat, and divers colours, to represent the
unknown quantities,* is not exclusive. Designating them by the initials of
their names, the equations may be formed by intelligent calculators, in this
manner : having given to each other one gem apiece, the jewellers become
equally rich : the values of their stocks, therefore, are r 5 * 1 pi dl
s 7 rl p\ d\
p97 rl si dl
d 9, rl si pi
If equal be added to, or subtracted from, equal, the equality continues.
Subtracting then one of each sort of gem from those several stocks, the re-
mainders are equal: namely r4, s6, p96, dl. Whatever be the price of
one diamond, the same is the price of four rubies, of six sapphires, and of
ninety-six pearls. Hence, putting an assumed value for the equal amount
of [remaining] stock, and dividing by those remainders severally, the prices
' By the rule of five ; or else by two sets of three terms. Crishn.
» G6L 11. §5.
' Already inserted in the L'Mvati, § 100. ' It is a further instance of a solution by putting
several sums equal.'— Sua. The problem is an indeterminate one.
* See the author's gloss on the rules at the beginning of Ch. 6.
C C2
196 VI'JA-GAN'ITA. Chapter IV.
are found. Thus, let the value be put 96, the prices of the rubies and the
rest are found, 24, I6, 1, and 96.'
1 12. Example : A principal sum, being lent at the interest of five in the
hundred [by the month], amounted with the interest, when a year was
elapsed, to the double less sixteen. Say what was the principal?
Here the principal is put ya 1. Hence by the rule of five 1 12 the
100 ya 1
5
interest is found ya ^. This, added to the principal, makes ya \. It is
equal to sixteen less than the double of the principal, namely ya 1 ru 16.
By this equation the principal sum is found 40; and the interest 24.
113. Example:* The sum of three hundred and ninety was lent in
three portions, at interest of five, two and four in the hundred; and
amounted in seven, ten, and five months respective!}', to an equal sum on all
three portions, with the interest. Say the amount of the portions.
The equal amount of each portion with its interest is put ya \. ' If, for
one month, five be the interest of a hundred ; then, for seven mouths, what
is the interest of the same?' Thus the interest of a hundred is found 35.
This, added to a hundred, makes 135. ' If ol this amount with interest, the
principal be a hundred, then, of the amount with interest, that is measured
by ydvat-tdvat, what is the principal ?' The quantity of the first portion is
thus found ya -f-f.. Again, ' if, for a month, two be the interest of a hun-
dred, then, for ten months, what is the interest of the same ?' Proceeding
Avith the rest of the work in the manner above shown, the second portion is
ya f . In like manner, the third portion is ya f . Their total ya |4 is equal
to the whole original sum 360. Whence the value of ydvat-tdvat is had 162.
IJy this the portions sought are "raised:" namely 120, 135 and 135. The
equal amount of principal with interest is 162.
1 14. Example: A trader, paying ten upon entrance into a town, doubled
his remaining capital, consumed ten [during his stay] and paid ten on his
' And the amount of each man's stock, after interchange of presents, is 233- Sua.
* Varied from an example in arithmetic, partly set forth in similar terms. Lil. §91.
SIMPLE EQUATION. 197
departure. Thus, in three towns [visited by him] his original capital was
tripled. Say what was the amount?"
Here the capital is put ya 1 . Performing on this, all that is set forth in
the question, the capital becomes on his return from three towns ya 8
ru 280. Making this amount equal to thrice the original capital, ya 3, the
value of ydvat-tdvat comes out 56.
115. Example: If three and a half mdnas of rice may be had for one
dramma, and eight of kidney-beans for the like price, take these thirteen
cdcinis, merchant! and give me quickly two parts of rice, and one of kid-
ney-beans : for we must make a hasty meal and depart, since my companion
will proceed onwards.*
Here the quantity of rice is put ya % and that of kidney-beans ya\. ' If,
for these three and a half mdnas one dramma be obtained ; then, for this
quantity ya 2, what is had ?' The price of the rice is thus found ya ^.
* If, for eight mdnas one dramma, then for this ya 1 what ?' The price of
the kidney-beans is thus found ya \. The sum of these, ya |-|, is equal to
thirteen cdcinis ; or in drammas W. From this equation the value of ydvat-
tdvat comes out ^. Whence, " raising" the answers, the prices of the rice
and kidney-beans are deduced \ and -^^ ; and the quantity of rice and of
kidney-beans, in fractions of a mdna, -^ and -f^.
1 16. Example: Say what are the numbers, which become equal, when
to them are added respectively, a moiety, a fifth, and a ninth part of the
number itself; and which have sixty for remainder, when the two other
parts are subtracted.
Here the equal number is put ya 1. Hence, by the rule of inversion,' the
' This is according to the gloss of Cri'shna, and conformable with collated copies of the text.
But Su'rya, reading dma-yucta-nirgame instead of dasa-bhuc cha nirganie, omits the consumption
often, during stay; and confines the disbursement, after doubling the principal, to ten for duties
on export. The equation, according to this commentator, is ^a 8 ru 210; and the value of j/a, 42.
ya3 ru
' Spoken by a pious riative of Gurjara, going to Dw&ricd to visit holy Cri'shna ; and stopping
by the way for refreshment, but in a hurry to proceed, under apprehension of being separated from
his fellow traveller. — Sua. The same example has been already inserted, word for word, in the
author's arithmetic. Lil. § 97-
* lAl. § 48. The fractions \, ^, ^, become negative; and the denominator being increased by
r^ VI'JA-G ANITA. Chapter IV.
several numbers are ya \, ya \, ya ■^. In this case, all the numbers, dimi-
nished by the subtraction of the other two parts, will be brought to the same
remainder, ya f .* This being made equal to sixty, the value oi y&cat-t&vat
is obtained 150. Whence, by " raising" the answers, the numbers are de-
duced 100, 125 and 135.
117. Example:- Tell me quickly the base of the triangle, the sides of
which are the surds thirteen and live, and the base unknown, and the area
four?
In this instance, if the base be assumed yavat-tavat, the solution is tedi-
ous.* Therefore the base is put in the triangle any way at pleasure,* since
it makes no difference in the result. Accordingly the triangle is here put
thus: rv^ Now, by the converse of the rule " half the base multi-
c5 rv^
Cl3
plied by the perpendicular, is in a triangle the exact area;" (Lil. § 164. J the
perpendicular is deduced from the area divided, by half the base: viz. c-f-f.
Subtracting the square of the perpendicular from the square of the side, the
square-root of the difference is the segment c -^. This, subtracted from the
base, leaves the other segment c VV*. The square of this being added to the
square of the perpendicular, the square-root of the sum is the side: viz. 4.*
This [the triangle being turned] is the base sought.
the numerator for a new denominator, they become 4^, ^, -^; which, being subtracted from ya 1
rendered homogeneous, leave the several original numbers ya f , ya f , ya ^. Suit.
^ Ya^ and j/a^j (making j/a Jg), subtracted from ya ^, leave j/a-,^; 3/a ^ and ya -jij (making
yaJJ)) subtracted from 5^0 f, leave 3^0 ^y; ya^ and ya^ (making ya ^), subtracted from _yo-^,
leave ya-^ : which, reduced to least terms, is ya^.
» This example and the following are introduced to show, that the method of performing arith-
metical operations, as taught in a preceding section (Ch. 1 . Sect. 4), are not useless trouble. Sua.
' It requires the resolution of quadratic equations. Crishn.
* Any one of the sides is made the base.
* Half the base c 13 is c 1^. The area ru 4 or c I6, divided by that, is c ^. Its square ru ^,
subtracted from the square ru 5 of the side c 5, or reduced to a common denomination ru ^^, leaves
the square ru -^i of which the square-root is c -^. This, subtracted from c 13, leaves c '^. Its
square ru ^, added to the square of the perpendicular ru ^, makes ru ^ or ru i6. Its root is
4. In like manner, putting the other side c 5 for the base, the perpendicular is c ^*. Its square
r««/, subtracted from the square ru 13 of the remaining side (c 13), leaves the segment c^ (the
SIMPLE EQUATION. 199
118. Example: The difference between the surds ten and five is one
side of the triangle ; the surd six is the other ; and the base is the surd
eighteen less rational unity, tell the perpendicular.
Here, if the segment be known, the perpendicular is discovered. Put the
least segment i/a 1. The base, less that, is the value of the other segment,
1/al nil cl8. Thus the statement is
ru 1 cl8
Subtracting the square of the segment from the square of its contiguous
side, two expressions of the square of the perpendicular are found ya v 1
ru 15 c 260 and i/a » 1 j/a Q, ya c 7'2 ru\3 c Ti. They are equal: and,
equal subtraction being made, the two sides of the equation become
rw 28 c512 Here the syllable ^a [the symbol of the unknown], in the
ya 2 yac 72
divisor, being useless, is excluded;* and the dividend and divisor are alike
rw 28 c512 Then, by the rule for " reversing the sign of a selected surd,
ru 2 c 72
and multiplying both dividend and divisor by the altered divisor," (§ 34)
putting the surd seventy-two affirmative, and multiplying by c 4 c 72, the
dividend becomes c 3136 c2048 c 56448 c 36864. Taking the difference
between the first and last, and between the third and fourth, it is reduced to
CI8496 c 36992 (or rw 136 c 36992). The divisor in like manner be-
comes c 4624 (or ru 68). Thus the statement of dividend and divisor is
rw 136 c 36992. The division being made in the manner directed, the
ru 68
value oi yavat-tavat is found rw 2 c8. ' This is the least segment. The
base, less this, is the other segment ; namely, n< 1 c 2. From the value of the
unknown yavat-tavat, " raising" the expressions of the square of the perpen-
root of ru }); whence the other segment is c ^. Its square ru ■/ added to the square of the per-
pendicular ru ^ is ru ^ or tk l6; the square-root of which is 4, (the other side, or base required,)
as before. Crisiin.
' This is the case in all instances, for the proportion to find the value of the unknown, is " if
this multiple of j/a give this known number, what does i/a give?" and thus, being alike in both the
multiplier and divisor, it is excluded from both. The author, however, has not noticed its exclu-
sion in other instances, where the algebraic solution was in this respect obvious : but, in the present
case, where the sign of a selected surd is to be reversed, and the dividend and original divisor to be
multiplied by the altered divisor, its presence in that multiplication would be highly disserviceaLle.
Its exclusion is now therefore specially noticed. Crisiin.
200 VI'JA-GAN'ITA. Chapter IV.
diciilar, or subtracting the square of the segment from the square of its conti-
guous side, the square of the perpendicular is deduced ru3 c 8. Its square-
root is the value of the perpendicular rw 1 c 2. '
119. Example:* Tell four unequal' numbers, thou of unrivalled under-
standing !* the sum of which, or that of their cubes, is equal to the sum of
their squares.
Here the numbers are put^a 1, ya2, ya 3, ya^. Their sum \%ya 10. It
is equal to the sum of their squares ya v 30. Dividing the two sides by the
common measure yavat-tavat, the statement is ya 30 ru From the
ya ru 10
value oi yavat-tarat hence found as before, by equal subtraction [and divi-
sion, § 101] viz. -\, the numbers are deduced by substitution of that value,
X -S- A A *
3> 3» 3J 3"
' The problem may be solved by the arithmetic of surds without algebra. (Li/. § l63.) The
turn of the sides is c5 c 10 c6. Their difference c5 c 10 c6. Multiplied together, the
product comprises nine terms, c 25 c 50 c 30 c 50 c 100 c 60 c 30 c 60 c 36; wherein
c 30 c 60 c 30 c 60 balance each other ; c 50 and c 50 added together make c 200 ; and
c 25 c 100 and c 36, being rational, make ru 5 ru 10 ru 6, or summed ru 9- The product
then is r«9 c 200; to be divided by the base ru 1 c 18. Thus the statement is c 8 1 c 200.
c i c 18
Proceeding with this by the rule, § 34, and putting c 1 positive, the dividend becomes by multipli-
cation c 81 c 200 c 1458 c 3600, reducible by the difference of the roots of the rationals 81
and 3600, and by finding the difference of the irrationals 200 and 1458, to ru 51, c 578. The di-
visor by similar multiplication iscl cl8 cl8 c 324 ; wherein the middle terms balance each
other, and the remaining two are rational, giving the difference ru VJ or in the surd form, c 289.
Hence the quotient of rM51 c 578 by ru 17.(0'' '^ 289) is '■"3 c 2; which added to, and sub-
tracted from, the base ru 1 c 18, gives the sum and difference ru 2 c 8 and ru ^ c 32; the moie-
ties whereof rul c2 and rw 2 c 8, are the two segments : and from these the perpendicular is
found as before, ru 1 c 2. Cafsiix.
* These and several following examples are instances of the resolution of equations involving the
square, cube, or other [power] of the unknown, by any practicable depression of both sides by
some common divisor, without elimination of the middle term. Crisiin.
^ Unequal or dissimilar; unalike. — Sua. This is a necessary condition. Else unity repeated
would serve for an answer to the question. — Cki'shn.
* Su'uYADASA reads and interprets asama-prajnya, of unrivalled understanding! CafsHNA-
BHATTA notices that reading, as well as the other, samach'Mdin having like denominators: reject-
ing, however, this; as it is not necessary, that it be made a condition of the problem, though it rise
out of the solution.
* Sumy. Sura of the squares ^. Su'r.
J
SIMPLE EQUATION 201
In the second example, the numbers are also put ya \, ya 2, ya 3, ya 4 :
the sum of their cubes is ya gh 100, equal to the sum of the squares ya v 30.
Depressing the two sides by the common divisor, square of yavat-tdvat ;
and proceeding as before, the numbers are deduced by substituting the value
o? ydvat-tdvat (^); namely, ^V. to. tV ii*
120. Example: Tell the [sides of a] triangle, of which the area may be
measured by the same number with the hypotenuse; and [of J that, of which
the area is equal to the product of side, upright and hypotenuse multiplied
together.
In tliis case, the statement of an assumed figure is n. ^ Here half
ya3 ^
ya4
the product of the side multiplied by the upright is the area, ya v 6. It is
equal to the hypotenuse ya 5. Depressing both sides by the common mea-
sure ydvat-tdvat, and proceeding as before, the side, upright and hypotenuse,
deduced from the value found of ydvat-tdvat (viz. f) are y, f and Y- Iii
like manner, by virtue of [various] assumptions, other values also may be
found. *
In the second example, the same figure is assumed. Its area is ya v 6.
This is equal to the product of side, upright and hypotenuse, ya gh 60.
Depressing both sides by the common divisor, square of ydvat-tavat, the
side, upright and hypotenuse, found as before, from the equation, are f, -j*
and ^. By virtue of assumptions, other values likewise may be obtained.*
I
121. Example: If thou be expert in this computation, declare quickly
two numbers, of which the sum and the difference shall severally be squares;
and the product of their multiplication, a cube.
Here the two numbers are put yav ^ yav 5; so assumed, that being ad-
ded or subtracted, the sum or difference may be a square.' The product of
their multiplication is ya vv 20. It is a cube. By making it equal to the
• Sura of the cubes f^; of the squares, f Jg. Sub.
* That is, both problems are indeterminate. So likewise were those proposed in the preceding
stanza, § 119-
' Ya V 9; or ya v 1.
D D
SOS VIJ'A-GAN'ITA. Chapter IV.
cube of ten times the assumed y/tvat-tA<oat, and depressing the two sides of
tlie equation by the common divisor, cube oi'ydvat-tavat, autl proceeding as
before, tbe two numbers are found 10000 and 12500.'
122. Example: If thou know two numbers, of wliich the sum of the
cubes is a square, and the sum of their squares is a cube, I acknowledge thee
an eminent algebraist.
In this instance the two numbers are put ya v \, ya v 9.. The sum of
tlieir cubes is ya v gh 9. This of itself is a square as required. Its root is
ya gh 3.
t Is not that quantity the cube of a square, not the square of a cube? No
doubt the root of the square of a cube is cube. But how is the root of the
cube of a square, a cube? The answer is, the cube of the square is precisely
the same with the square of the cube.* Hence if squares be raised twice, or
four, or six, or eight times, their roots will be so once, twice, thrice, or four
times, respectively. It must be so understood in all cases.
Now the sum of the squares of those quantities h ya v v 5. It must be a
cube. Making it equal to the cube of five times yavat-tdvat, and depres-
sing the two sides of the equation by the common divisor, cube of yavat-
tdvat, and proceeding as before, the two numbers are found 6'i5 and 1250.*
' From the depressed equation ^a 20 ru the value of yo is found 50. Its square is 2500,
ya ru 1000
of which the multiples yav 4, and j/a v 5 are 10000 and 12500. In like manner, putting other
quantities, as ^/a v l6 and yu z> 20; and making their product ^^acr 320 equal to cube of j/a 20,
(ya gA 8000;) the equation depressed by the common measure j/a^/i, is yfl 320 ru Whence
ya O ru 8000
the value of ^a is 25 ; the square of which is 625; and its multiples 10000 and 12500 are the two
numbers. By varying the suppositions, a multiplicity of answers is obtained. Su'r.
* The cube of the square is the sixth product of the quantity. It is the third product of the
second product of equal quantities multiplied. As the cube of the second product, so is the second
product of like multiplication of a third product. Therefore, it is also the square of the third pro-
duct. Crisiin.
', The value of ya being 25. Or, putting the two numbers yo gi 5, axiA ya gh 10, the sum of
their squares is a cube ya gh v 125. Its cube root is ya v 5. The sum of the cubes of the same
quantities is ya gA gA 1125. It is a square. Make it equal to the square of ya c r 75, viz. ya »
V V 5625. Reduce the two sides of the equation by the common measure ya v v v. The equation
i»y« 1125 ru Whence the value of ya is found 5 ; and the two numbers 625 and 1250.
ya ru 5625
In like manner a multiplicity of answers may be obtained. CafsHK'.
SIMPLE EQUATION. «03
Thus it is to be considered, how practicably the unknown quantity [or its
power] may be made a common measure.
123. Example: Tell me, friend, the perpendicular in a triangle, in
which the base is fourteen, one side fifteen, and the other thirteen.*
If the segment be known, the perpendicular is so. Put therefore yavat-
tavat for the least segment, ya 1 : the other is the base less ydvat-tdvat, ya \
ru 14. Statement:
14
The squares of the sides, less the squares of the contiguous segments, are the
square of the perpendicular. They are equal consequently. Statement of
them for equal subtraction : yav I ya ru 169 . From these the equal
ya V I ya 28 ru 29
square vanishes; and then, proceeding as before, the value of ydvat-tdvat is
found, 5. From which the two segments are deduced 5 and 9 ; and the
square of the perpendicular being " raised" [by substitution of that value] in
both expressions, it is deduced alike both ways : viz. 12.
Here the substitution for a square, is by a square; and for a cube, by a
cube : as is to be understood by the intelligent calculator.
124. Example:* If a bambu, measuring thirty-two cubits, and standing
upon level ground, be broken in one place by the force of the wind ; and
the tip of it meet the ground at sixteen cubits; say, mathematician, at how
many cubits from the root is it broken?
In this case, the lower portion of the bambu is the upright. Its value is
put ydvat-tdvat. Thirty-two, less that, is the upper portion, and is the hypo-
tenuse. The interval between the root and tip is the side. See
ya 1
ru l6
• There was not much occasion for this example. — Crishh'. For the finding of the perpendicu-
lar had been already exemplified by §118. That, however, was performed by the arithmetic of
surds : and this is done by a plain algebraic calculation.
'■ The base, as well as the sum of the hypotenuse and upright, being given, to discriminate them.
SvR. and Crisiin. See Lil. § 148 ; where this example has been already inserted.
D D 2
204 V I'J A- G A N'l T A. Chapter IV.
The sum of the squares of the side and upriglit, ya v I ru 256, is equal to
the square of the hypotenuse, 3/fl v 1 ya64 rw 1024. The equal squares
vanishing, and [the usual process being pursued] as before, the value of
y&vat-tavat is found 12. Whence the upright and hypotenuse are deduced
by substitution of that value, 12, 20. In like manner, if the sum of the
hypotenuse and side be given, as in the example " A snake's hole is at the
foot of a pillar,'"' [they may be discriminated] also.
1 25. Example :* In a certain lake swarming with ruddy geese and cranes,
the tip of a bud of lotus was seen a span above the surface of the water.
Forced by the wind, it gradually advanced, and was submerged at the dis-
tance of two cubits. Compute quickly, mathematician, the depth of water.
In this case, the length of the stalk of the lotus is the depth of water.
Its value is put ya\. It is the upright. That, added to the bud of the lotus,
is the hypotenuse, ya f ru \. The side is two cubits. See 1 ru2
y»l yfal ruj
Here also, the sum of the squares of the side and upright, yav I ru 4, be-
ing made equal to the square of the hypotenuse yav \ ya\ ru -»-, the depth
of water, which is the value of the upright, is found ^ ; and the hypote-
nuse *y'.
126. Example:' From a tree a hundred cubits high, an ape descended
and went to a pond two hundred cubits distant: while another ape, vaulting
to some height oft' the tree, proceeded with velocity diagonally to the same
spot. If the space travelled by them be equal, tell me quickly, learned man,
the height of the leap, if thou have diligently studied calculation.
The equal distance travelled is 300. The measure of the leap is putya L
The height of the tree added to this is the upright : the equal distance tra-
velled, less ydxsat-td'cat, is the hypotenuse. The interval between the tree
' Lil. § 150. See further a note on § 140 of this treatise.
* The difference between the hypotenuse and upright, as well as the side (base) being given, to
find the hypotenuse and upright. — Sua. and Cri'shn. See Lil. § 153, where the same example i»
inserted. See likewise Lil. § 152.
' This also is found in the LUi-Mi, § 155. It is borrowed with some variation from Bhahme-
CUPTA or bis conmuntator. Brahm. 12. § 39-
SIMPLE EQUATION. «0i
'■^\yai ru300
and the well is the side. See ya i
ru 100
i
ru 200
Making the sum of the squares of upright and side equal to the square of
the hypotenuse, the measure of the leap is found 50.*
127. Example:* Tell the perpendicular drawn from the intersection of
strings stretched mutually from the roots to the summits of two bambus
fifteen and ten cubits high standing upon ground of unknown extent.'
Here, to effect the solution, the value of the ground intercepted between
the bambus is arbitrarily assumed : say 20. Put the value of the perpendi-
cular let fall from the intersection of the strings ya 1. See
20
* If, to the upright fifteen, the side be twenty, then to one measured by
ydvat-tdvat \f\viX will be the side?' Thus the segment contiguous to the
less bambu is found ya \. ' If, to the upright ten, the side be twenty, then,
to one measured hy ydvat-t mat, what will be the side?' Thus the segment
contiguous to the greater bambu is found ya 2. Making the sum of these,
ya *3° equal to twenty, ru 20, the perpendicular comes out 6; the value of
yavat-tdvat. Whence, by substitution of this value, the segments are de-
duced 8 and 12.
Or the segments are relative [that is, proportionate] to the bambus; and
their sum is the base.* As the sum of the bambus (25) is to the sum of the
segments (20); so is each bambu (15 and 10) to the segments respectively
(12 and 8). They are thus found; and, from them, by a proportion,' the per-
' And hence thie value of the hypotenuse, 250.
* Like the preceding, this too is repeated from the Lildvati, § l60.
* The ground intercepted between the bambus is expressly said to be of unknown extent, to^
intimate that the distance is not necessary to the finding of the perpendicular. Crishn.
* As the bambu becomes greater or less, so does the segment. It may be found therefore by the
role of three : ' as the sum of the bambus is to whole base, so is one bambu to the particular seg-
ment.' CRfsiiN.
' As a side, equal to the base, is to an upright; which is the less bambu, so is a side, equal to the
greater segment, to the perpendicular. The less bambu is the upright, the base is the side, and
the string passing from the tip of the less bambu to the root of the other bambu is the hypotenuse ;
by virtue of the figure: and [in the small triangle] the greater segment is side, and the perpendi-
206 V r J A-G A N'l T A. Chapter IV.
pendicular is deduced (6). What occasion then is there for [putting a sym-
bol of the unknown] yavat-tdvat ?
Or the product of the two bambus multiplied together, being divided by
their sum, will be the perpendicular, whatever be the distance between the
bambus.' What use then is there in assuming a base? This will be clearly
understood by the intelligent, after stretching strings upon the ground [to
exhibit the figure].
cular is upright. In like manner, proportion is to be made with the less segment and greater
bambu. Crishn.
* As the sum of the bambus is to the base, so is the greater bambu to the segment contiguous to
it ? Then, ' as the base is to the less bambu, so is the greater segment to the perpendicular.'
Here the base, being both dividend and divisor, vanishes; and the product of the two bambus,
divided by their sum, is the perpendicular. Crish:/.
CHAPTER V.
QUADRATIC, ^c. EQUATIONS.
Next equation involving the square or other [power] of the unknown is
propounded. [Its re-solution consists in] the elimination of the middle
term,' as teachers of the science'' denominate it. Here removal of one term,
the middle one, in the square quantity, takes place : wherefore it is called
elimination of the middle term. On this subject the following rule is deli-
vered.
128 — 130. Rule: When a square and other [term] of the unknown is
involved in the remainder; then, after multiplying both sides of the equa-
tion by an assumed quantity, something is to be added to them,' so as the
side* may give a square-root. Let the root of the absolute number again be
' Mad'hyamdharatia ; from mad'hyama middlemost, and dkaraiia a taking away or (apanayana)
removal, — Cri'shn. or (nisa) a destroying, — Su'r. that is, elimination. The resolution of
these equations is so named, because it is in general efTected by making the middle term (twice
the product of the roots, §26) disappear from between two square terms. — Sua. and Crishn. ;
and note on " equation," Ch. 4.
* Acharyas ; ancient mathematicians C&dya-ganaca) : as ARYA-BiiArr'A and the son of Jishn'u
[Brahmegupta] and Cuaturve'da [Prit'hudaca-swa'mi], Su'r.
' This is not exclusive : in some cases the two sides are to be reduced by some common divisor;
and in some instances an assumed quantity is to be subtracted from both sides. Crishn.
♦ So as each side of the equation may yield a square-root. Both being rendered such, the
root of the known is then to be made equal to the root of the unknown side Su'r. However, if
the absolute number be irrational, its root may be put in the form of a surd. See Crishn. cited
in note 1 next page.
a08 VIJ'A-G ANITA. Chapter V.
made equal to the root of the unknown : the value of the unknown is found
from that equation.' If the solution be not thus accomplished, in the case
of cubes or biquadrates, this [value] must be elicited by the [calculator's]
own ingenuity.
130. If the root of the absolute side of the equation be less than the
number, having the negative sign, comprised in the root of the side involving
the unknown, then putting it negative or positive, a two-fold value" is to
be found of the unknown quantity : this [holds] in some cases.'
' When on one side is the unknown quantity ; and on the other the absolute number ; then,
since they are equal, the absolute number is the value of the unknown: as already shown. But,
for the purpose of a division of the remaining absolute number, it is requisite that the unknown
should stand separate. The equation, therefore, must be so treated ; as that such may be the
case. If to equal sides then equal addition be made, or from them equal subtraction; or if equal
multiplication or equal division of them take place ; or extraction of their roots, or squaring of
them, or raising to the cube or other [power] ; there is no loss of equality : as is clear. Now, if
a square or other [power] of the unknown be on one side, and number only on the other, the un-
known cannot stand separate without extraction of the root. The roots, therefore, of both sides
are to be extracted consistently with their equality : and, that being done, the roots also will be
equal. Therefore it is said, " after multiplying both sides by an assumed quantity, something is
to be added to them." Crisiik.
An equation comprising a single colour (or symbol of unknown quantity) being prepared as be-
fore directed, when, after equal subtraction, division is next to be made (§ 101), if on the side of
the unknown the square and other terra of the unknown remain, then both sides are to be multi-
plied by some quantity, and something is to be added ; so as both sides may furnish squares. The
roots of both being then extracted, let equal subtraction be again made; and, that being done,
the value of the unknown is obtained by division. The principle of the process is, that, if the re-
sidue (or prepared equation) comprise the square and other term of the unknown, the solution can
be then only effected, when the square is the only term of the unknown; and that can only be
when the root of the square is extracted. Accordingly it is said "so as the side may give a square-
root." Thus, the root of the side of the equiition comprising the square of the unknown being
extracted, the remainder (^ 26) of the compound square, that is, the middle term, which stands
between the square of ihe unknown and square of number, is exterminated. Sua.
* M&na, miti, unmAna, or unmiti; measure, value; root of the equation. See § 1/.
* Making the known number on the side of the equation involving the unknown term, positive,
a value of the unknown is to be found : then, making the same negative, another value of the
unknown is to be deduced : and thus, both ways, the condition of the question is answered.
Bearing this in mind, the author has said in another place, ' There are two hypotenuses, &c.'
SuR.
Demonstration : When equal subtraction from equal sides take* place, if there be a
QUADRATIC, &c. EQUATIONS. ' 209
131. ISrid'hara's rule on this point : ' IMultiply botli sides of the equa-
tion by a number equal to four times the [coeflicient] of the square, and
number, negative, on the side of the unknown ; then, by the rule for changing the sign of the
subtrahend (§ 5), the sum of the absolute numbers on the two sides will be the value : but, if the
number be positive on the unknown side, then, by same rule, the difference of the quantities is the
value. When it is thus discovered how many times the sura or difference of the absolute quanti-
ties is greater than the difference of the terms of the unknown, the value of the unknown is ob-
tained, being that which the sum or difference so many times measures. Thus both answer the
conditions of the question ; because such multiple of the divisor balances the dividend. [Ld.
§ 17-] But, if the value of j/dval-tdrat be too little with reference to the given number specified
in the example, it is unsuitable. With a view to this, the author has said at the close of the rule,
It holds " in some cases." (§ 130). Sua.
If the root of the known quantity exceed the absolute number comprised in the root on the side
of the unknown, why should not there be a two-fold value in this instance also, by the same rea-
soning as in the other case? Hear the reply. In the instance, where the number being negative,
the unknown is positive, that number must be subtracted from the absolute side, that the remainder
of the unknown may be positive; the number becomes therefore affirmative; and there is no incon-
gruity. But in the second case, where, the number being positive, the unknown is negative, the
unknown must be subtracted from the other side of the equation, to become affirmative ; and the
number on the absolute side, being subtracted from that comprised in the root e.xtracted from the
unknown side, becomes negative : and, if it be the greater of the two, the value is negative. The
second value conse<iuently is every way incongruous. Hence -the rule (§ 130). When the tenor
of the condition is " unknown less number," if that is to be squared, the term of the simple un-
known comes out negative, because the number [which multiplies it] is so. In such case when
the square-root is extracted, number only is negative, not the unknown : for it is certain that the
number is negative in the condition as proposed. If the unknown were put negative, the side of
the equation would be negative ; for it cannot be affirmative while the greater quantity is sub-
tractive. Or, admit that it is affirmative in some cases; still it would differ from the side of equa-
tion that is consistent with the condition of the problem. Such being the case, how can it be equal
to the second side which is one consistent with that condition? Therefore a value, coming from
such an equation, must be incongruous ; because it is negative : for people do not approve
a negative absolute number. Hence, in such, an example, although the root of the known quan-'
lity be less than the negative number in the root of the unknown side (§ 130), there cannot be a
two-fold value : for a value, grounded on the assumption of the number being affirmative [contrary
to the tenor of the condition] must be incongruous. In like manner, if the tenor be " the number
less the unknown squared," the unknown alone, not the number, will be the negative in the root :
by parity o/ reasoning. Therefore, in this instance also, there cannot be a two-fold value : for a
value, grounded on the assumption of the number being negative, will be incongruous. It is thus
in many various ways. Sometimes, by subtraction of the addition or other means it is the reverse.
Sometimes, by reason of the unknown being naturally negative, though the root might possibly be
two-fold, the second is incongruous. Accordingly the author has said indefinitely, "This holds
in some cases." See an example of the incongruity of the second value, § 140. See likewise an
E Ji
810 VIJ'A-GAN'ITA. Chapter V.
a<ld to them a number equal to the square of the original [coefficient] of
the unknown quantity.' (Then extract tlie root.")'
instance in the chapter on the three problems (SirSniani, Ch.3, § 100), where the question is pro-
posed as one requiring the resolution of a quadratic equation; and the answer (Jb. § 101) shows,
that, in taking the roots of the two sides of the equation, the unknown has been taken negative and
the absolute number positive: for, if the number were taken negative, the answer would come out
differently. Thus by the reasoning here set forth, the congruity or incongruity of a two-fold value
is to be every where understood : and the author's remark, it holds in some cases (§ 1 30), is justified.
Crisiin.
' That is, multiply both sides by the quadruple of the number belonging to the square of the
unknown ; and add to both sides the square of the number which belonged to the unknown previous
to that multiplication. This being done, the side involving the unknown must furnish a square-
root : and the second side of the equation, being equal to it, should do so likewise. Else of
course the instance is an imperfect one. — Crishn. If the known side, nevertheless, do not fur-
nish a root, it must be taken in the form of a surd. — Ibid. Sr/d'hara's rule, having reference
both to the unknown and to its square, is applicable only in the case where the same side of equa-
tion comprises the square of the unknown, and the unknown too. In any other case means of ob-
taining a root must be devised by the intelligent calculator exercising his own ingenuity.* — Ibid.
* This insertion is according to the reading which occurs and is expounded in the commentary
of Su'ryada'sa, avyacta-varga-rupair yuctau pacshau tato tnUlam: "both sides are to have added,
numbers equal to the square [of the coefficient] of the unknown. Then the root [is to be extract-
ed]." CRisiiNA-BHATTA's reading and RAMA-CRfsHNA's, with which their exposition too is con-
formable, and which has been followejl in the preceding part of the version of the text, differs
widely: purvffxyactasya criteh sama-mp6ni cshipet tayor eva. Collated copies of Bha'scara's text
agree with this : but the variation is marked in the margin of one exemplar.
^ Demonstration : After preparing the equation by equal subtraction, if the square of the un-
known and the simple unknown be on one side, and absolute number only on the other ; the first
side of the equation cannot by any means furnish a root without some addition. For, if the un-
known alone be squared, the square of the unknown will be the single result : but, if ihe unknown
with number added to it, be squared, the result will be [three terms] square of the unknown, un-
known, and number: but, in the proposed case, two terms only being present, namely square of
the unknown, and unknown, it is not the square of any quantity. Therefore, number must be
added. By subtraction of the unknown, the square of the unknown remaining a single term, would
furnish a root : but then the other side consisting of [two terms] unknown and number, would
not afford one. If the term, containing the square of the unknown, give a root, the addition only
of a number is needed. But, if it do not afford a root, that term must be multiplied or divided
by some quantity. Addition to it will not answer; for the other side, with equal addition, will
yield no root. Nor should a term of the unknown be added to both sides : for tliat would be
troublesome. Besides, if the coefficient of the unknown be two, what multiple of the square shall
• Tlie concluding remark must be taken as relating to equations of a higlier degree : for the oilier case of quadratics
i> the simple one ; Suio'uaiia's rule suflicing for aScctcd quadratic equations.
QUADRATIC, &c. EQUATIONS. 211
132. Example : The square-root of half the number of a swarm of bees
is gone to a shrub of jasmin ; and so are eight-ninths of the whole swarm :
a female is buzzing to one remaining male, that is humming within a lotus,
be added ? If 2, 7, 14, 23, 34, 47, or 62, times the square of the unknown be added, the one side
will furnish a root, and not the other. If 1, 4, or the like multiple be the addition, the first side
will give no root. Nor will the subtraction of the square serve : for the square, being negative on
the second side, will not there afford a root. Nor should once, or four times, the square be added,
when the square had 3 or 5 [for coefficient]; but multiplication by 2, 6, &c. take place, when it
has 2, 6 and so forth : for the solution will not be uniform, but very troublesome ; since both sides
will comprise [three terms] square of the unknown, unknown, and number. Therefore the square
of the unknown is to be only multiplied by some quantity. When that square, however, affords a
root, number only needs to be added. The question is, what this additive number should be. If the
-oot of the square unknown term have 1 [for coefl^cienl], the addition of the square of half [the
coefl^cient of] the unknown term must make that side of equation yield a root. For the product
of one and of half will be half the unknown ; and twice that will be equal to the unknown ; and
the extraction (§ 26) will be equal without rem.iinder. So, if [the coefficient] of the root be two,
the additive should, by the same analogy, be equal to the square of a quarter of the [coefficient
of the] unknown term. If it be three, the additive should be the square of the sixth part. Con-
sequently the number to be added must be equal to the square of the quotient of the (ancaj co-
efficient of the unknown term by twice the CancaJ coefficient of the root which the square unknown
term affords. But, if the coefficient of the square unknown term do not yield a square-root, it
must do so when the term is multiplied by that same coefficient. Therefore both sides of the
equation are to be multiplied by the coefficient of the square unknown term. Here, by the pre-
ceding analogy, to find the additive number, the coefficient of the unknown term is to be divided
by twice the coefficient of the root of the square unknown term. Now the coefficient of the root
is the unmulliplied (or original) coefficient of the square Unknown term. Therefore the coefficient
of the unknown term is to be divided by twice the original coefficient of the square ; and is to be
multiplied by the original coefficient of the square, as common multiplier of the two sides of equa-
tion. Abridging the multiplier and divisor by the common measure, the original coefficient of the
square unknown term, the result is two for the divisor of the original coefficient of the unknown
term. In like manner, where the coefficient of the square unknown term yields a root without
previous multiplication, there also both sides being multiplied by that coefficient, and a number
equal to the square of half the previous coefficient of the simple unknown term being added, a
root is had : for the reasoning holds indifferently. Both sides, then, by this process being made
to afford roots, if they be further multiplied by four to avoid a fraction, there is no detriment to
their square nature. The square unknown term then, being multiplied by four, the coefficient of
its root is doubled. The coefficient of the simple unknown term is to be divided by that. The
divisor then is four times the original coefficient of the square. Now the common multiplier of
the equation is just so much. Multiplier and divisor then being equal, both vanish ; and the ad-
ditive number is the square of the original coefficient of the simple unknown term. Crishn.
£ E 2
fil2 VI'JA-GAN'ITA. Chapter V.
in which he is confined, having been alhired to it by its fragrance at night.
Say, lovely woman, the number of bees.'
Put the- number of the swarm of bees ya v 2. The square-root of half this
is^fl 1. Eight-ninthsof the whole swarm are 3/at7 ij*. The sum of the square-
root and fraction, added to the pair of bees specified, is equal to the amount
of the swarm, namely ya r 2. Reducing the two sides of the equation to a
common denomination, and dropping the denominator, the equation is
yav \% yaO ru and, subtraction being made, the two sides are
yavl6 ya9 ru IS
yav 2 ya 9 ru Multiplying both tliese by eight, and adding the
ya vO yaO rw 1 8
number eighty-one, and extracting both roots, the statement of them for an
equation is ya A ru 9 Whence the value ydvat-tavat comes out 6. By
ya ru 15
substituting the square of this, the number of the swarm of bees is found 72.
133. Example: The son of Prit'ha, exasperated in combat, shot a
quiver of arrows to slay Carn'a. With half his arrows he parried those of
his antagonist ; with four times the square-root of the quiver-full, he killed
his horse ; with six arrows he slew Salya ; with three he demolished the
umbrella, standard and bow ; and with one he cut off the head of the foe.
How many were the arrows, which Arjuna let fly?'^
In this case put the number of the whole of the arrows ya<o \. Its half
is ya V ^. Four times the square-root are ya 4. The specified arrows are ru 10.
Making the sum of these {ya v ^ ya4 rw 10) equal to this quantity yav \;
reducing both sides of the equation to a common denomination, dropping
the denominator, making subtraction as usual, adding sixteen to both sides
of the equation [j/a v I yaS rul6 extracting the square-roots, and making
yavO yaO ru 36]
these again equal [ya 1 ru4> the y&]\ic of yavat-tdvat h foimd \0. From
ya ru 6]
which, by substitution, the number of arrows comes out 100.
1 34. Example : Of the period [series] less one, the half is the first term j
' This example is repeated from the Lildvati, § 68.
* This also occurs in the Lildvati, 67.
QUADRATIC, &c. EQUATIONS. 213
a moiety of the first term is the increase [common difference] ; and the sum
[of the progression] is the product of increase, first term and period muhi-
phed together, and augmented by the addition of its seventh part.. Tell the
increase, first term, and period.'
Here the period is put ya 4 rii \; the first term ya 2 ; the common differ-
ence ya 1. The product of their multiplication augmented by its seventh
partisj^a^^ %^ yav y. This amount of the progression is equal to its
sum found by the rule {Lil. \ 119) wz.ya gh 8 yav 10 ya 2. Depressing
both sides by their common divisor ydvat-tdvat, reducing them to a common
denomination, and dropping the denominator, and then making subtraction,
the two sides of the equation become ya v 8 ya 54 ra From these mul-
yav Q ya rw 1 4
tiplied by eight, and having the square of twenty-seven added to them, the
square-roots being extracted, are^yaS ru9.7 Equating these, the value of
ya ru 29
yavat-tdvat is found from the equation, 7; and the substitution of that value
gives the first term, common difference, and number of terms, 14, 7 and 29.
135. Example: What number being divided by cipher, and having the
original quantity added to the quotient and nine subtracted from this sum,"
and the consequent remainder being squared and having its square-root added
to that square, and the whole being then multiplied by cipher, will amount
to ninety ? '
Here the number is put ^fl 1. Tliis divided by cipher, isj/a-i. (The ad-
dition and subtraction being made,* it is still ya \. This squared is ya v -^.
' An example of the sura of an arithmetical progression. See Lil. Ch. 4.
* The version is according to Su'ryada'sa's reading of the text : but CuisHNA-BiiAirTA ap-
pears to have read, as does Ra'ma-crisiin'a, ' having fcd^i'^ ten millions added or subtracted;'
riiih cotya yuctu 't'haxonitah, instead of rasir adya-yucto naxonitah. Collated copies differ : but the
variation is noticed in the margin of one.
' This and the following are examples of the arithmetic of cipher. See § 12 — 14, and LU,
S 44—46.
♦ CRisHNA-nHATTA seems here also to have read, ' with ten millions added or subtracted :'
and the quantity, being a fraction with cipher ,lbr its denominator, remains unaltered by the addi-
tion of a finite quantity (§ l6). But Suryada'sa, though he cites § l6 and Lit. §45, deduces
from the conditions of the question the equation, ya u 4 3/a 34 rtt72 by adding to j/a ;; 4 ya^G
yav ya ru 90
214 VI'JA-GAN'ITA. Chapter V.
The root added to it makes 3^« iy -J- i/a ■^. Multiplied by cipher, the multi-
plier and divisor being alike vanish, leaving i/av I yal.) Hence multiply-
ing [the equation] by tour and adding one, and proceeding as before, the
number is found 9-
136. Example: Say what is the number, which having its half added
to it, and being multiplied by cipher, and the product squared, and added
to twice the root of that square, and this sum being divided by cipher, be-
comes fifteen ?
The number is put ya 1 . This, having its half added to it, becomes i/a f.
Being multiplied by cipher, it is not to be made nought but to be considered
as multiple of cipher, further operations impending. Wherefore i/a f "0,
being squared, and having twice the root added, becomes ya v ^0 i/a ^ 0.
This is divided by cipher : and here, as before, the multiplier being 0, and
the divisor 0, both multiplicator and divisor, as being equal, vanish ; and
the quantity is unaltered:' viz. yav^ 3/« V- Equating with fifteen, re-
ducing to a common denomination, and then dropping the denominator, the
two sides of the equation by preparation become yavQ ya \Q ru
ya V ya rii 60
Adding four,* and extracting the square-roots, the value of ydvat-tdvat by
equal subtraction comes out 2.
137. Example : a stanza and a half. What is the number, learned man,
■which being multiplied by twelve and added to the cube of the number, is
equal to six times the square added to thirty-five r*
The number is put ya 1. This multiplied by twelve, and added to the
cube of the number, is ya gh 1 i/a 12. It is equal to this other quantity
yav 6 ru 35. Subtraction being made, the first side of the equation be-
ru 81, its TooiyaZ ru9; and thence [doubling the equation, and] proceeding by the rule § 131,
he derives the equation of the roots ya 8 ru 34 From which, by the usual process, he finds 9
ya ru 38
for the value o{ i/a. One of the copies of the text, which have been collated for the present trans-
lation, omits the whole of this intermediate work here enclosed within a parenthesis.
• Lil. § 44—45.
* The additive four sufficing to make them afford square-roots. Crishi/.
' It has been said " If the solution be not thus accomplished, [as] in the case of cubes or bi-
quadrates, the value must be elicited by the [calculator's] own ingenuity." § 129. The present and
the following are instances of the application of that aphorism. Sua.
QUADRATIC, kc. EQUATIONS. 215
comes yaghl yav 6 ya 12; and the other side, ru 35. Adding the nega-
tive number ciglit to both (or subtracting eight from both sides') and ex-
tracting the cube-roots,* they are i/a 1 ru 2 From the equation of these
yaO ru 3
asrain, the amount of the number is found 5.
138. Example: If thou be conversant with operations of algebra, tell
the number, of which the biquadrate, less double the sum of the square and
of two hundred times the simple number, is a myriad less one.
■ Let the number be put 7/a 1 . This, multiplied by 200, is T/a 200. Added
to the square of the number, it is yav I ya 200 ; which, multiplied by two
becomes j/a v 2 ya 400. The biquadrate of the number, less that, \s yawl
yav 2 ya 400. This is equal to a myriad less unity. The two sides of the^
equation are yav v 1 yav2 ya 400 ru Here adding to the first
■ yaw ya vO ya ru 9999
side ydvat-tdvat four hundred, with unit absolute, it yields a root (ya "c 1
ru i): but the other side (^a400 ru 10000) does notj and the solution
therefore is not accomplished. Hence ingenuity is in this case called for.
Adding then, to both sides of the equation, square of yavat-tdvat four,
ydvat-tdvat four hundred, and a single unit absolute, roots of both may be
extracted. Thus the first side, with the additive, becomes ya v v 1 yav 2,
ru\. The other side, with it, exhibits j/a i> 4 j^a400 ru lOOOO. Their
roots are yav I ru\ and ya2 rw 100. From these, equal subtraction
being made, the two sides of the equation are deduced ya v I ya 2, ru
yavO ya ru 99
Again adding unit to each side, the roots are obtained ya I ru \ From
ya 7'u 10
which equation the vdXvxe of ydxiat-tdvat comes out 11. In like instances
the value must be elicited by the sagacity of the intelligent analyst.
1 39. Example : The eighth part of a troop of monkeys, squared, was
skipping in a grove and delighted with their sport. Twelve remaining
t>
' A variation of the text is here put in a parenthesis. The effect is the same; and one reading
serves to interpret the other.
^ By the analogy of the rule for the extraction of the square-root (§ 26) taking the roots of the
cube of the unknown and of the absolute number, and subtracting from the remainder thrice the
product.s [of the square and simple quantities] two and two. Si/r.
216 VI'JA-GAN'ITA. Chapter V.
were seen on the hill, amused with chattering to each other. How many
M'erc they in all r '
In this case the troop of monkeys is put ya 1. The square of its eighth
part, added to twelve, being equal to the whole troop, the two sides of
equation dXQ yax! -^ yaO tm 12 Reducing these to a common denomi-
yax! ya I rii
nation, dropping the denominator, and making equal subtraction, they be-
come yav\ ya 64 ru From these, with the square of thirty-two
. yavQ ya ru 768
added to them, the roots are extracted ya 1 ru 32 Tlie number of the
ya ru \6
root on the absolute side is here less than the known number, with the nega-
tive sign, in the root on the side of the unknown. Making it then negative
and positive, a two-fold value oi ykvat-tavat is thence obtained, 48 and 16.
140.* Example: The fifth part of the troop less three, squared, had
gone to a cave ; and one monkey was in sight, having climbed on a branch.
Say how many they were?'
Here the troop is put i/a 1. Its fifth part is ya^. Less three, it is ya\
ru y . This squared \% ya*o ^ y^ if ^" W- With the one seen (-|f). it is
yav -^ ya^ ru ^-^. This is equal to the troop ya 1. Reducing these
* This instance is relative to the rule (§ 130) which admits a two-fold value of the unknown,
when the square-root on the absolute side is less than the known number, comprised in the square-
root on the other side of the equation. Su'r. and Cafsux.
• SuRYADASA here interposes an example, the same which is inserted \n the lAl&vati, §150.
It is not, however, found in collated copies of the V'lja-gaiiita, nor noticed in this place by Crishn'a-
BHATTA, nor by Ra'ma-ckishn'a. The solution, as wrought by" the first named commentator,
follows : ' Put ya 1 for the side of the triangle or distance between the snake's hole and the point
of meeting. If this side be subtracted from the sura of the side and hypotenuse, namely 27, the
remainder is the hypotenuse: it is ya 1 ru 27. Its square, yav 1 ya 54 ru 729, is equal to the
sura of the squares of the side put ya I and upright given 9 : naraely ya v \. ru 81. liqual
subtraction being made, the value of ya is found, 12. Thus the distance between' the hole and
point of meeting comes out 12 cubits ; and this, subtracted from the distance from the hole of the
spot where the snake was seen, namely 27, leaves the equal progress of the two, 15. — Sur. The
example, as is apparent, is here out of place, and should have been noticed by the scholiast, where
the author has himself referred to it, in his gloss on § 124.
' Two instances are here given to show, that the twofold value is admissible in some cases only.
Crisiin.
QUADRATIC, &c. EQUATIONS. 217
sides of equation to a common denomination, dropping the denominator, and
making equal subtraction, the equation becomes ?/aw 1 ya55 ru Mul-
yavO ya ru 250
tipJying by four, and adding a number equal to the square of fifty-five (3025),
the roots extracted are ya 2 ru 55 Here also a two-fold value is found
ya ru 45
as before, 50 and 5. But the second is in this case not to be taken: for
it is incongruous. People do not approve a negative absolute number.'
141. Example: The shadow of a gnomon twelve fingers high being
lessened by a third part of the hypotenuse, became fourteen fingers long.
Tell quickly, mathematician, that shadow.
In this case the shadow is put ya 1. This, less a third of the hypotenuse,
becomes fourteen fingers. Hence, conversely, subtracting fourteen fingers
from it, the remainder is a third of the hypotenuse, ya 1 ru 14. This then,
multiplied by three, is the hypotenuse ; ya3 ru 42. Its square is ya v 9
ya 252 ru 1764; which is equal to this other value of the square of the hy-
potenuse,^ yav I ru 144. Equal subtraction being made, the two sides of
' The second value being five, its fifth part, one, cannot have three subtracted from it. There
is incongruity ; to indicate which the author adds expressly, ' the second is in this case not to be
taken.' Su'r.
. Put \ya 5 for tlie troop of monkeys. Its fifth part is yai. Less three, it is 3/a 1 ru3. This
squared is j/a f 1 i/a6 ru ()■ With one added, it is ya v I ya6 ru 10; and is equal to ya 5.
Equal subtraction being made, the equation h yav I ^a 1 1 ru Multiplying by four, and
ya V ya r« 1
superadding the square of 1 1, it becomes yav 'i ya 44 ru 121 Here, since the known numb«r
yavO ya ru 81
was proposed as negative [i.e. subtractive] the root should be taken, under the reasoning before
stated [gloss on § 130] ya2 ru H; not yai ru \l. The root of the second side of the equation
is 9.* By further equation of the roots, the value of ya comes out 10. Whence the number
of the troop is deduced 50. But, if the known number (11) be made positive, the value
ofya will be 1 ; and the whole quantity 5. From its fifth part (one), three cannot be subtracted. If
indeed the enunciati<m of the question were, " The filth part of the troop taken from three" [in-
stead of" less three"], the second value, and not the first, would be taken. For the fifth part of
the first value cannot be deducted from three. Crisiin.
* For the shadow being the side of a rectangular triangle, and the gnomon twelve fingers in
length being the upright : {Siromani: Book 1, Ch. 3.) the rule, that the square-root of the sum of
their squares is the hypotenuse, is universally known. Su'r.
• Or else 9. But with this toot the aw.hor would take j/a 2 full instead of j/o S rull.
F F
$18 VI'JA-G ANITA. Chapter V.
the equation become yav^ ya 252 ru Multiplying by two, and
yav ya ru 1620
superadding the square of the number sixty-three, the roots are ya 4 ric 63
ya I'll 27
Making these again equal, and proceeding as before, the value o^ yavat-tdvat
is obtained two-fold *-^ and 9. The second value of the shadow is less than
fourteen : therefore, by reason of its incongruity, it should not be taken.
Hence it was said " this holds in some cases." (§ 130.)
It is in derogation of the maxim delivered in Padmanabha's algebra,' on
this subject :
142. " When the root of the absolute side is less than the known number
being negative on the other side, making it positive and negative, the value
comes out two-fold." *
143 — 144. Example: What are the four quantities, friend ! which with
two severally added to them, yield square-roots ; and of which the products,
taking them two and two, contiguous,' become also square numbers when
eighteen is added : and which are such, that the square-root of the sum of
all the roots added to eleven, being extracted, is thirteen ? tell them to me,
algebraist !
In this case, the number, which, added to two quantities, renders them
square numbers, is the additive of the [original] quantities. That additive,
multiplied by the square of the difference of the roots, is the additive of the
product. That is, the product of those two ({uantities, with the addition of
tljis [additive] must yield a square-root. The products of the roots of the
quantities, taken two and two contiguous, being lessened by a deduction of
the additive of the quantities, are the roots of the products of those quanti-
ties.* This principle must be understood in all [similar] cases. In the pre-
sent instance, the additive of the products is nine times the additive of the
simple quantities. The square-root of nine is three. Therefore, the roots
' Padmaiu'ibha-V'ija.
* The quotation, as copied by the commentator Su'ryada'sa, contains the very reservation
for which Bha'scara. contends " the value will be two-fold sometimes:" daid'hd minan cwachit
bhavet, instead uf dicividhufpadj/ate rnili/i, the reading which occurs in collated copies.
' The first and second are to be multiplied together; and the third and fourth. — Sua. First
and second ;- second and third ; third and fourth. Crishm.
♦ For the demonstration of both these positions, see note to § 145.
QUADRATIC, &c. EQUATIONS. . 219
of the quantities are [arithmeticals] differing by the common difference
three : i/a 1 t/a I ru3 ya\ ru6 ya\ ru 9- The products of these, two
and two, less the additive of the simple quantities, being computed, are
the square-roots of the products of the quantities with eighteen added.
Hence the roots of the products as above described are yav 1 ya3
ru2; yav I yaQ ru 16; yav I ya\5 ru59,} The sum of all these
and of the original roots h yav 3 ya 3\ ru 84. Making this, with
eleven added to it, equal to the square of thirteen ; multiplying the sides of
the equation (after equal subtraction) by twelve; and superadding the square
of thirty-one, the roots are ya6 rw 31 From the equation of these again,
ya rM 43
the value o? ydvat-tavat \s found 2. Whence the roots of the quantities are
deduced, 2, 5, 8 and II. Of course the original quantities (being the
squares of those roots, less the additive of the simple quantities,) are 2, 23,
62 and 1 19.
On this subject there is a maxim of an original author :*
145. ' So many times as the additive of the products contains the additive
■ Su'ryada'sa, employing only the first of the foregoing positions, as it is contained also in the
maxim cited from an earlier writer (§ 145), deduces the algebraic expressions for the roots of the
products from those of the simple quantities : * The additive of the products (18) is nine times the
additive of the simple quantities (2). Its square-root is 3. The simple roots then are ya\ ruO
ya I ru 3
ya I ru6
ya i ru 9
Andthequantitiesdeduced bysquaringtheseandsubtractingtheadditivetwOjarej/acl ya ru i
yav I ya 6 ru 7
yav I yal2 ru 34
yav I ya 13 ru79
The products of the contiguous two and two, (^"^ ^' '' 1 ^"^f ,f ^'^ ,f ^^ J,^ ''" ^
., , ,, , '<yavvl yagklS yav 41 ya 284 ru 250
with eighteen added, are iyavv\ yag/,30 yav 113 ya\560 r«2704
The square-roots of these three are j^ai; 1 3^0 3 ru 2 Their sum (ya» 3 ya 27 ru66) with
ya V I ya 9 »"« 1^
ya V I ya 15 ru 52
the sum of the simple roots (ya4 ru 18) or yav 3 ya31 rw 84, with 11 added, is equal to the
square of 13, or I69. The equation thenisj/at;3 j/a31 ru 95 and, after subtraction, be^
yav ya ru I69
comes ya v 3 ya 31 ru Proceeding as usual (§ 131), the value of y&vat-tdvat comes out 2.'
yavO ya ru 74 Su'u.
* Neither Bha'scara, nor his commentators, intimate the name of this ancient and (Mya)
original author, whose words are here quoted.
F I- 2
S£0
Vl'JA-G AN'ITA. Chapter V.
of the simple quantities, by the square-root of that [submultiple] as a common
difference, the unknown (juantities are to be put [in arithmetical progression]
and to be stjuarcd, and then diminished by subtraction of the additive."
This supposition of apposite quantities required much dexterity in com-
putations.
U6. Example : Say what is the hypotenuse in a plane figure, in which
the side and upright are equal to fifteen and twenty? and show the dcmon-
stiation of the received mode of computation.''
Here the hypotenuse is put ya 1. Turning the triangle, the hypotenuse
is made the base ; and its side and upright are the sides : and the side and
upright in each of the triangles situated on either side of the perpendicular
• The demonstration of this, and of Biiascaua's corresponding position with the further one
sulyoined by him, is given by the commentator CufsHNA : ' If the square-root of a quantity in-
creased by an additive be known, then by inversion the quantity is the square of that root, less the
additive ; and is also known. From the first root the first quantity is found pv\ a I ; and, in
like manner, from the second root, the second quantity dn 1 a 1. That, which, added to their
product, makes it a square, is the additive of the product. Multiplied together their product is
pv.dvbhX pv.abhi dv.ahhl av\. In the second term, the square of the first root multiplied
by the additive is negative; and, in the third terra, the like multiple of the square of the second
root is also negative. To abridge, put sum of the squares of the roots multiplied by the additive with
the negative sign. The first term is the product of squares of the roots ; or, which is the same, the
square of the product of the roots. The statement then is r prod, t) 1 r » sum a 1 a i> 1. In the
second of these three terms, the sum of the squares of the roots is resolvable into two parts ; the
square of the difference of the roots and twice the product of the roots. (LU. § 135.) The second
term is thus resolved into two; namely the square of the difference and twice the product multi-
plied by the additive : and the statement of all the terms in their order consequently is r prod, v 1
rdiff. r.oi r prod, a 2 av\. Now the number, which, added to this product of the quantities,
makes it afford a square-root, is the additive of the product. But here, if the square of the differ-
ence of the roots multiplied by the additive (r diff. r. a 1) be superadded, the remaining terms
r prod. V 1 rprod, a 2 av \, will yield a square-root. It is therefore demonstrated, that the
additive of the simple quantities, multiplied by the square of the difference of the roots, is additive
of the product ; and the product of the same roots, less the additive, will be the root of the pro-
duct of the quantity. The same reasoning is applicable to the second and third; and to ihe third
and fourth. Thus the root of one quantity being put y{,mt-t&vat, the roots of all may be rightly
deduced from if [by their common difference computed from the additives]. CRfsiiN.
» The question of the hypotenuse is here put, solely to inquire the principle of the solution of
,,. ,, Crisus.
this problem.
QUADRATIC, &c. EQUATIONS. 221
let fall in the proposed triangle, are analogous to the former.' Hence the
proportion : ' if, when yavat-tdvat is hypotenuse, this be the side (1,5), then,
the hypotenuse being fifteen (equal to the original side), what is ?' Thus
the side [of the smaller triangle] is found, and is the segment contiguous to
the original side : ru 225 Agaiji, if ydvat-tavat being hypotenuse, this
ya 1
be the upright (20), tlien, the hypotenuse being twenty (equal to the ori-
ginal upright), what is ?' Thus the upright [of the other little triangle] is
found, and is the segment contiguous to the original upright :^ ru 400 The
y» 1
sum of the segments is equal to hypotenuse : and from so framing the equa-
tion, the value of hypotenuse is deduced,' the square-root of the sum of the
squares of the side and upright, viz. 25. Hence, substituting the value,
the segments are found 9 and 16; and thence the perpendicular 12. See
Or the solution is thus otherwise propounded. The hypotenuse is j/a I.
Half the product of the side and upright is the area of the triangle: 150.
' They are proportional ('rtnK;'M/)aJ . Crishn.
* The greater side being here named the upright, (while either side might have been so denomi-
nated ; Lil. § 133.) in the original triangle, the greater side of the one small triangle must be taken
as the upright found by the proportion ' as yhat-taval is to the original upright, so is an hypote-
nuse of that length to a quantity sought :' it is the segment, which is the greater side of this tri-
angle; not the perpendicular, which is its less side. So the smaller side of the other little triangle
must be taken as the side found by the proportion, ' as yAvat-tivitt is to the original side, so is a hy-
potenuse of that length to a quantity sought :' and it is the segment, this being the least side of the
triangle ; not the perpendicular which is here the greater side. Crishn.
^ CafsiiNA gives the solution by literal symbols alone. By the first proportion ya 1 | bhu 1 |
bhu 1 I the segment contiguous to the side is bhu v I By the other proportion, ya I \ co I \ co I \
ya 1
the segment contiguous to the upright is co v 1 The sum of the segments bhu v \ fo t' 1 is
ya\ ya I
equal to the base ya 1. Reducing to a common denomination and dropping the denominator, the
two sides of the equation become ya v 1 Hence the square of the hypotenuse is equal to
bhu V I cov \
the sum of the squares of upright and side. — CRfsiiN. Here bhu is initial of bhuja, the side (lit.
arm); and co of co/i, the upright.
sc«
VI'JA-G ANITA.
Chapter V.
With four such triangles, another figure having four sides, each equal to the
hypotenuse,' is constructed for the purpose of finding the hypotenuse. See
Thus another interior quadrilateral is framed ; and the difference between
the upright and side is the length of its side. Its area is 25. Twice the pro-
duct of the upright and side is the area of the four triangles, 600. The sum
of these is the area of the entire large figure ; 625. Equating this with the
square o? ydvat-tdvat, the measure of the hypotenuse is found, 25.* If the
absolute number, however, be not an exact square, the hypotenuse comes
out a surd root.
147. Rule : Twice the product of the upright and side,' being added to
the square of their difference, is equal to the sum of their squares, just as
with two unknown quantities.*
Hence, for facility, it is rightly said ' The square-root of the sum of the
squares of upright and side, is the hypotenuse?''
• The triangles are to be so placed, as that the hypotenuse may be without; and the upright of
one be in contact with the side of another : else, by merely joining four rectangular triangles [with the
equal sides contiguous,] a quadrilateral having unequal diagonals [that is, a rhomb] is constituted;
in which one diagonal is twice the upright ; and the other double the side of the triangle; instead
of a square comprising five figures (four triangles and a small interior square). But, if the upright
and side be equal, a square only is framed, which ever way the side is placed, since there is no
difference of the upright and side: and in this case there is no interior square. Crishn.
» In this instance also, Crisiina exliibits the solution by literal symbols: ' Area of the tnangle
bhu.co\. Multiplied by four, it is the area of four such triangles, bhu.co2. Difference
bku \ co\. Its square bkuv I bhu. co 2 cor 1. This, which is the area of the interior square,
being added to the area of the four triangles, bhu. co 2, makes bhu vl co v 1 ; the area of the
, Crishn.
entire square. ^
3 This is not confined to upright and side ; but applicable to all quantities. (Ld. § 135.)
Cri'shn.
♦ Let the two quantities be ya I ca I . The square of their diflerence will be ya v 1 ya. ca bh 2
cavi. To this twice the product ya. ca bh 2 being added, the result is the sum of the squares
Crisiiit.
ya t I ca V i .
' See the same rule expressed in other words ; Lil. § 134-.
15XJ
20 X
/20
/15
5
QUADRATIC, &c. EQUATIONS,
Placing the same portions of figure in another form, see
148. Example : Tell me, friend, the side, upright and hypotenuse in a
[triangular] plane figure, in which the square-root of three less than the side,
being lessened by one, is the difference between the upright and hypotenuse.
In this case the difference between the upright and hypotenuse is arbi-
trarily assumed : say 2. Hence, by inversion, (taking the square of that
added to one and adding three to the square;) the side is obtained, 12. Itsi
square, or the difference of the squares of hypotenuse and upright, is 144.
The difference of the squares of two quantities is equal to the product of
their sum and difference.*^ For a square' is the area of an equilateral qua-
drangle [and equi-diagonal*]. This for example, is the square of seven, 49:
Subtracting from it the square of five, viz. 25, the remainder is 24.
7
See
5
Here the difference is two; and the sum is twelve: and the product of
the sum and difference consists of 24 equal compartments
12
J2
Thus it is demonstrated, that the difference of the squares is equal to the
product of the sum and difference. Hence, in the instance, the difference
of the squares, 144, being divided by the assumed difference of the hypo-
* Producing the line, the figure is divided into two squares : one the square of the upright; the
other the square of the side : and their sum is the area of the first or large square ; and its square-
root is the side of the quadrilateral. Crishn.
* Lil.^ 135.
' Varga, or 2d power.
* CaiSHNyi.
224
VI'JA-G ANITA.
Chapter V.
tenuse and upright, 2, is the sum, 72-' This sum, twice set down, and
having the dift'crence severally subtracted, and being halved according to
the rule of concurrence,* gives the upright and hypotenuse 35 and 37- In
like manner, putting one, tlie side, upright and hypotenuse are 7, 24, and
27. Or, supposing four, they are 28, 96, and 100.' So in every [similar]
case.
149. Rule: The difference between the sum of the squares of two
quantities whatsoever, and the square of their sum, is equal to twice their
product ; as in the case of two unknown quantities.*
For instance, let the quantities be 3 and 5. Their squares are 9 and 25.
The square of their sum, 6"4. From this taking away the sum of the squares,
the remainder is 30. See
3 5 8 5
n
—
5
8
"^
—
—
—"
—
n
—
~~
—
—
—
3
r
'
1
—
J
Here square compartments, equal to twice the product are apparent; and
[the proposition] is proved.
150. Rule: The difference between four times the product and the
square of the sum, is equal to the square of the difference of the quantities;
as in the instance of unknown ones.'
Let the quantities be 3 and 5. From the square of their sum, taking
away four products' at the four corners, there remain in the middle, square
" See Lit. § 57.
* LU. § 5.5.
' The problem is an indeterminate one.
* Let the quantities be t/al cal. The suip of their squares is j/a » 1 ca v I ; and the square of
their sum ya v 1 ya. cabhl cav\. The difference between which is ya. ca bh 2; or twice the
product of the two quantities. CafsHN.
' Let the two quantities be ya 1 ca 1. Four limes the product is ya. ca bh 4. The square of
ihesumisyatl ya.cabhl carl. From this square talking four times the product, the re-
mainder is yav\ ya.cabhk cav\. And this is the square of the difference of the two quan-
tities. Crishn.
* Rectangles.
QUADRATIC, &c. EQUATIONS.
225
compartments equal to the square of the difference of the quantities ; and
[the proposition] is proved. See
5
2
5
3
151. Example: Tell the side, upright and hypotenuse, of which the
sum is forty, and the product of the upright and side is a hundred and
twenty.
Here twice the product of the side and upright is 240. It is the difference
between the square of their sum and the sum of their squares.' The sum
of the squares of the side and upright is the same with the square of the hy-
potenuse.^ Therefore it is the difference between the square of the sum of
the side and upright, and the square of hypotenuse; and is equal to the pro-
duct of sum and difference. Therefore this difference, 240, divided by the
sum 40, gives the difference of hypotenuse and the sum of the side and
upright, viz. 6. The sum, having thfe difference severally subtracted and
added, and being then halved, gives by the rule of concurrence,' the sum of
the upright and side 23, and the hypotenuse 17.* From the square of the
sum of the upright and side, namely 529, subtract four times the product
(§ 150), viz. 480, the square root 7 of the remainder (49) is the difference of
the side and upright. From the sum and difference, the side and upright
are found by subtraction and addition and then taking the moieties: and
they come out 8 and 15.
152. E.xample:' Tell me severally the side, upright and hypotenuse,
the sum of which is fifty-six; and their product seven times six hundred.
In this instance put hypotenuse ya I . Its square is i/av I. It is the sum
of the squares of the side and upright. The sum of the three sides (hypo-
tenuse, upright and base) less hypotenuse is the sum of the upright and side;
' § 149.
« § 146.
' Lit. § 55.
* For the sura of two sides must exceed the hypotenuse. (_LU. § l6l .) Crishh.
' This example, though overlooited by Su'ryada'sa, is noticed both by Cri'shna and Ra'ma-
cbishn'a; and is found in all the collated copies of the te.\t.
G O
S26 VI'JA-GAN'ITA. Chapter V.
Sf^ I ru 56. So the product of the three, divided by hypotenuse, gives the
product of upright and side ru 4200 By a preceding rule C§ 149) the dif-
1/a 1
ference between the sum of the squares (ya v 1) and the square of their sum
(i/a V I t/a 112 ru 3136), namely j/c 112 ru 3136, is equal to twice the
product or ru 8400 First reducing to least terms by the common divisor a
ya I
hundred and twelve; then bringing both sides of the equation to a common
denomination, dropping the denominator, making equal subtraction,' and
superadding the square of fourteen to both sides of the equation,* the value
of ydvat-tdvat is found, 25. A second value in this case comes out by way
of alternative, namely 3: but it is not to be taken because it is incongruous.*
In the instance, the product of the three sides, 4200, being divided by
the hypotenuse 25, gives the product of the upright and side, 168. Thus
the sum of the upright and side being 31 (^56 less 25), the difference of the
upright and side is found by the preceding rule (§ 150) namely 17. And
thence, by the rule of concurrence,* the side and upright are deduced 7
and 24.
So in all [like] cases.
The intelligent, by a compendious method, do in some instances resolve
a problem by reasoning alone. But the grand operation is by putting [a
symbol] of the unknown.
" The text to which Ra'macrishn'a's commentary is appended, here exhibits
Equation j^a » 112 ya 3136 ru Abridged by 112, i/a v I ya 28 ru
yav yaO ru 8400 ya v ya ru75
• Some copies of the text substitute the equivalent operation of multiplying by four, and adding
the square of twenty-eight.
* See remark under § 141.
♦ If/. §55.
CHAPTER VI.
EQUATION INVOLVING MORE THAN ONE UNKNOWN
QUANTITY.
Next, Analysis by a Multiliteral Equation is propounded.
153 — 156. Rule: Subtract the first colour (or letter') from the other
side of the equation; and the rest of the colours (or letters) as well as the
known quantities, from the first side:* the other side being then divided by
the [coefficient of the] first, a value of the first colour will be obtained.' If
there be several values of one colour, making in such case equations of them
and dropping the denominator,* the values of the rest of the colours are to
be found from them.' At the last value, the multiplier and quotient, found
by the method of the pulverizer,* are the values of both colours, dividend
' See the author's following comment; and the note upon it.
* That is, the two sides of the equation are to be so treated, as that a single colour may remain
on one side: which is effected by equal subtraction of all the rest of the terms on that side from
both; and of the term similar to it on the other. It is not necessary to restrict the choice of the
particular colour : but, as there is no motive for passing by the first, that is selected to be retained;
Crishn.
' This division is the equivalent of the proportion, in which one of the unknown is the third
term, and a multiple of it is the first ; to find the value. See note on § 157.
* After reduction to a common denomination.
' This sufiices for problems admitting but one solution. What follows, relates to indeterminate
problems.
* An answer to an indeterminate problem being required in whole numbers. Else arbitrarj^
values may be put for all the remaining unknown terms in the last and single value of an unknown.
In such case the answer is easy : but is probably fractional. CRimti.
G g2
228 VrJA-GAN'ITA. ChapteuVI.
and divisor:' if there be other colours in the dividend, put for them any
arbitrarily assumed values; and so find those two. By substituting with
these inverse!}', the values of the rest of the colours are then obtained.
But, if a value be fractional, the investigation of the pulverizer is to be re-
peated; and, with that substituting for the last colour, deduce the values
conversely from the first.*
This is analysis by equation comprising several colours.'
In this, the unknown quantities are numerous, two, three or more. For
which yavat-tavat and the several colours are to be put to represent the
values. They have been settled by the ancient teachers of the science:*
viz. " so much as" {yavat-tavat), black (cc/flcfl), blue («//«•«), ytWow {pitaca),
red (lohitaca), green {haritaca), white (swetaca), yarlegntcd {chit raca), tawny
(capilaca), tan-coloured {piugala), grey (d'humraca), pink (pcitalaca), white
(savalaca), black [sydmalaca), another black (mechaca), and so forth. Or
• The colour or letter, appertaining to the divisor, is the quantity of w hich the algebraic expres-
sion was the value ; its coetiicient being the divisor or denominator. — See note to § 157. The
colour belonging to the dividend or numerator, is one comprised in that alaebraic expression of the
value of the former. See note on the author's comment below. One unknown is a function of
the other.
* The commentator CkTshna notices two variations, or altogether three readings of this passage.
He prefers one as most consistent with the author's own explanation of his text ; and interprets it
thus: If, in course of substitution, the value of another colour be had fractional, investigation of a
pulverizer is to be again performed; and, with that multiplier, substituting for the last colour, de-
duce the values inversely from the first. That is, with the particular multiplier termed pulverizer
(Ch. 2), substituting for the colour contained in the two or more last values, again deduce the
values inversely from the preceding: meaning from the value which contained a fractional one.
Beginning thence, let inverse substitution take place.
The second reading is, ' the other colour (or letter) is to be found by repeating the investigation
of the pulverizer; and with that substituting for the original [or, according to another construc-
tion, for the last, colour] ; deduce the values conversely from the first;' or, as the third reading
varies it, ' deduce conversely the last and the first.' It is defective in either construction : for the
pronoun " that" refers to the " other colour (or letter);" the value of which is found by investiga-
tion of the pulverizer: but " the other" so referred to is the divisor in that investigation: and the
" last" colour, for which substitution is to be made, is the dividend: and the sentence, therefore,
according to these readings, directs a substitution of vfilue for the wrong colour. Crishn.
^ Anica-varna-sam'tcamna vija. See Ch. 4. note on gloss following § 100 — 102.
"* FiirvAcMryAik, by former teachers. What particular authors are intended is unexplained.
Brahmegupta employs names of colours to designate the unknown, without any remark; whence
it appears that the use was already familiar. See Braiim. 18. § 52 d seq.
MULTILITERAL EQUATIONS. 229
letters* are to be employed; that is the literal characters c, &c. as names of
the unknown, to prevent the confounding of them.
Here also, the calculator, performing as before directed (Ch. 4) every
operation implied by the conditions of the example, brings out two equal
sides, or more sides, of equation. Then comes the application of the rule:
' From one of the two sides of the equation, subtract' the first (letter or)
colour of the other. Then subtract from that other side the rest of the (let-
ters or) colours, as well as the known quantities. Hence the one side being-
divided^ by the residue of the first (letter or) colour, a value of the (letter or)
colour which furnishes the divisor is obtained. If there be many such sides,
by so treating those that constitute equations, by pairs, other values are found.
Then, among these, if the values of one (letter or) colour be manifold, make
them equal by pairs, drop the denominator,* and proceeding by the rule
[§ 153], find values of the other (letters or) colours : and so on, as practicable.
Thereafter,' the number (coefficient) of the dividend (letter or) colour in
the last value is to be taken as .the dividend quantity ; and that of the divi-
' Varna, colour or letter : for the word bears both imports. Former writers used it in the one
sense, and directed all the unknown quantities after the first to be represented by colours. But
the author takes it also in the second acceptation ; and directs letters to be employed, instancing
the consonants in their alphabetical order. He appears tu intend initial syllables. (See his solu-
tion of the problem in § 1 U .) His predecessors, however, likewise made use of initial syllables for
algebraic symbols ; for instance the marks of square, cube and other powers ; and the sign of a
surd root: as well as the initials of colours as tokens of unknown quantities.
^ See§ 101.
' Ibid.
* After reduction to a common denominator.
' In the last and single value of the unknown denoted by a colour, if one or more unknown
terms denoted by ctdours be comprised, values might be arbitrarily put for all these terms in the
dividend ; and these values being summed, and divided by the denominator, would give the value
of the first colour. It might be either a fraction or integer, and the values of the rest would be
those arbitrarily assumed. Such a solution is facile. But, if the answer be required in whole
numbers, then reserving one colour put arl)itrary values for the rest; and thus a single colour with
certain absolute numbers will remain in the dividend. Now such a value of that colour is to be
assumed, as that the coefficient of the colour, being multiplied by the assumed quantity, and added
to the absolute number, and divided by the denominator, may yield no residue: for so the value of
the first colour will be an integer. This is the very problem solved in the investigation of a pulve-
rizer (Ch. 2). If then a value of the colour in the dividend be putequal to the multiplier so found,
the colour appertaining to the divisor will be the quotient, and an integer. Hence the text, " At
the last value, &c." (§ 154 — 155.) Ciusiin'.
230 VI'JA-G ANITA. Chapter VI.
sor (letter or) colour, as the divisor quantity ; and the absolute number, as
the additive quantity: with which, proceeding by the rule of investigation
of a pulverizer (Ch. 2), the multiplier, which is so found, is the value of the
dividend (letter or) colour; and the quotient, which is obtained, is that of
the divisor (letter or) colour. The reduced' divisor and dividend [used as
abraders in the investigation] of these two values, being multiplied by some
assumed* (letter or) colour, are to be put as additives [of the multiplier and
quotient,'' or values so found,] and thence, substituting their values with
these additives, for those colours (or letters) in the value of the former colour
(or letter), and dividing by the denominator, the quotient, which is obtained,
is the value of the former colour (or letter). In like manner, inversely sub-
stituting [the values thus successively found], the values of the other colours
(or letters) are thence deduced. But, if there be two or more colours (or
letters) in the last value, then putting arbitrarily assumed values for thera,
and substituting by those values and adding the results to the absolute num-.
ber, the investigation of a pulverizer is to be performed.
In the course of inverse substitution, if the values of a colour (or letter),
in a value of a preceding one, be fractional, then the multiplier, which is
found by a further investigation of the pulverizer, with the addition [of the
divisor*] is the value of the dividend colour (or letter).' Then substituting
with it for that colour (or letter) in the last values of colours (or letters),
and proceeding by inverse substitution, in the preceding ones, the values of
the other colours (or letters) are found.
In this [analysis], when the value of a (letter or) colour is found, (whether
that value be a known quantity, or an unknown one, or known and un-
• See § 54.
* The assumed colour represents the arbitrary factor, introduced (§ 64) to make arbitrary mul-
tiples of the (abrading) divisore additives of the multiplier and quotient ; that is, of the values here
found. By substituting cipher for this assumed colour, as is frequently done in the following exam-
pies (§ l60, l6l, l63, &c.), the simple values are used without the additives. It does not represent
an unknown quantity which is sought; but a factor of the divisors, which is to receive an arbitrary
value: and it serves to show the relation of the quantities in the manifold answers of an indetermi-
nate problem, the solution of which is required in whole numbers. See CRfsHN.
' See §64.
♦ Ibid.
' Recourse is had to this method, to clear the fraction : for the same reason holds indifferently.
CRfSHN.
MULTILITERAL EQUATIONS. ssi
known together ;) and is multiplied by the coefficient of the unknown, the
removal or extermination of that ("literal character or) colour is called
(Uti'hapana) " raising" or " substitution."*
Example : " The quantity of rubies without flaw, sapphires and pearls,"
&c. (§ 105.)
In this case, -^wWavk^ yavat-tavat, &c. for the rates of the rubies and the
rest, and making the number of each sort of gem with its rate a multiple,
and superadding the absolute number, the statement for equal subtraction is
ya5 ca S ni 7 ruQO Proceeding as directed, to " subtract the first co-
ya7 ca 9 ni 6 ru 62
lour, &c," (§ 153) this single value oi ydvat-tdvat is obtained ca\ ni\ rwQS*
ya9.
Being single, this same value is "last" (§ 154). Therefore the investigation
of the pulverizer must take place. In this dividend there is a couple of co-
lours : wherefore (§ 155) the value o^ ni is arbitrarily put Unity ; with which '
substituting for ni, and superadding it to the absolute number, there results
ca 1 ru 29 Hence, by the rule of investigation of the pulverizer, the
ya 2
multiplier and quotient, together with the additives [deduced from their di-
visors] are found pi 2 ru 1 Then, substituting for pi by putting cipher
pi 1 ru 14
for it, the rates of the rubies and the rest come out 14, 1, 1. Putting one
for pf, they are 13, 3, 1; assuming two, 12, 15, 1; or, supposing three,
11, 7, 1. Thus, by virtue of suppositions, an infinity of answers is ob-
tained.
Example : " One says * give me a hundred, and I shall be twice as rich
asyou,'&c. (§ 106).
• The value of aiiy colour, that is found, whether expressed by absolute number, or symbol of
unknown quantity, or both, and occurring in another, is deduced by the rule of three : for in-
stance, in example §157, the value of ca is found ni^O pil6; and pi h lo i ritO; and ni is
ca9
lo 31 ru 0. Then the proportion, ni I \ lo 31 ?•« | n« 20 | , gives fo 620 ru ; and tliis, pi 1 |
fo4 ruO \ pil6 \ , gives lo 64 ruO. Their sum, fe 684 ruO, divided by 9, gives the value of
ca; viz. /076 ru 0. This in termed utt'hdpana, raising or substitution. Crisiix.
* For the reason of retaining the symbol of the unknown ya, in the fraction expressing its value,
see note on § 157.
iiSi VIJA-GANITA. Chapter VI.
Let the respective capitals he 3/al ca I. Taking a hundred from the
capital of the last, and adding it to that of the first, they become ya 1 ru 100
and ca 1 ru 100. The wealth of the first is double that of the second:
therefore equating it with twice the second's capital, a value oi yavat-tdvat
is obtained ca 2 ru 300 Again, ten being taken from the first and added
ya 1
to the capital of the second, there results ya 1 ru 10 and ca 1 ru 10. But
the second is become six times as rich as the first: wherefore making the
second equal to the sextuple of the first, a value of yavat-tavat is obtained
ca 1 ru 70. With these reduced to a common denomination and dropping
yaS
the denominator, an equation is formed ; from which, as being one contain-
ing a single colour (or character of unknown quantity), the value of ca
comes out by the foregoing analysis (Ch. 4) ; viz. 170.' With which sub-
stituting for ca, in the two values of ydvat-tavat, and adding it to the ab-
solute number, and dividing by the appertinent denominator, the value of
ydvat-tdvat is found, 40.
157- Example : The horses belonging to these four persons respectively
are five, three, six and eight ; the camels appertaining to them are two,
seven, four and one ; their mules are eight, two, one and three ; and tlie
oxen owned by them are seven, one, two and one. All are equally rich.
Tell me severally, friend, the rates of the prices of horses and the rest.
Here put ydvat-td'cat, &c. for the prices of the horses and the rest. The
number of horses and cattle, being multiplied by those rates, the capitals of
the four persons become ya 5 ca Q ni S pi 7 These are equal. From
ya 3 ca 7 ni 2, pi I
ya 6 ca 4! ni 1 piQ
ya 8 ca I ni 3 pi 1
the equation of the first and second, the value of ydvat-tdvat is obtained
ca 5 ni 6 pi 6 From that of the second and third, it is ca 3 ni 1 pi 1
ya ^ ya3
In Hke manner, from that of the third and fourth, it is ca 3 ni2 pi 1.*
yaZ
' The commentator, Crishn'a, quotes from liis preceptor, Vishnu Chandra, a rule for ex-
amples of this nature; abridged, as he observes, from the algebraic solution.
* In these fractional values of ya deduced from the preceding equations, by equal subtraction
I
MULTILITERAL EQUATIONS. 233
Reducing these' to a common denomination,- and dropping the denomi-
nator, the vakie o? cdlaca is found from the equation of the first and second,
«i 20 pi \6 ; and from that of the second and third, ni 8 pi 5. From an
ca 9 ' cfl 3
equation of these two reduced to a common denomination, the value of
nilaca is had piSl. This being "last" value (§ 154) the investigation of
«i 4
the pulverizer gives, (as there is no additive ;') multiplier 0, or, with the
addition [of its divisor*] lo 4 ru 0. It is the value of pitaca. Also, (for
the same reason) the quotient 0,' with the addition [of its divisor*]
/o31 ru 0. It is the value of nilaca. Substituting for ni and pi by
their respective values in that of ca, adding them together, and di-
viding by the appertinent denominator, the value of cdlaca is obtained
lo 76 ru 0. Substituting for ca and the rest by their own values in that
of 7/dvat-tdvat, adding them together, and dividing by the appropriate de-
nominator, the vahie of ydvat-tdvaf comes out lo85 ruO. Then, lohitaca
being replaced by unity arbitrarily assumed, the values of ydvat-tdvat
and the rest are found, 85, 76, 31, 4. Or putting two for it, they arc
170, 152, 62, 8. Or, supposing three, they are 255, 228, 93, 12. Thus,
by virtue of suppositions, an infinity of answers may be obtained.
158 — 159. Example by ancient authors :' Five doves are to be had for
three drammas ; seven cranes,* for five; nine geese, for seven; and three
and then by proportion, yal \caS ni 6 pi6 \ i/al and i/a3 \ caS nil pi'l \ yal also i/a 2 I
caS ni2 pi I \ ya 1, tlie syllable j/a is inserted in the denominator to indicate that the value is
olya; not to include it as a factor of the denominator: for the first and third terms containing it
were reduced by it as a common divisor; and, if that were not done, the numerator would be a
multiple of it. Chishn.
' Olher values of i/a might be found by combining the first and third ; first and fourth; and
second and fourth. But that is not done, as there is no occasion, Crishn.
The foregoing operations to find the value of the first colour were in fulfilment of the rule
4 153. The work now proceeds to the finding of the values of the rest by § ]54.
^ See § 63.
♦ See § 64.
' -^dya, original or early writers. The commentators do not here specify them; nor hint
whence the quotation comes. Su'ryada'sa only says " certain writers;" and observes, that it is a
well known instance. The rest are silent.
* Surasa, the Siberian crane: Ardea Siberica.
H H
234 VI'JA-GAN'ITA. Chapter VI.
peacocks, for nine : bring a hundred of these birds for a hundred drammas,
for the prince's gratification.
In this case, putting y6vat-t&vat, &c. for the prices of the doves, &c. find
the number of birds of each kind by proportion ; and make the equation
with a hundred. Or else multiply the rates three, five, &c. and the number
of birds five, seven, &c. hy y&xiat-tuvat, and severally make an equation with
a hundred.' Thus, ya 3, ca 5, ni 7, pi 9, being the prices, make their
sum equal to a hundred; and the value of ydvat-tdvat is found
ca5 iiij pi 9 ru 100. Again, making the h'nxhyaS, ca7, ni9, pi 3, equal
to a hundred, the value of ydvat-tdvat h obtained caj ni9 pi 3 ru 100.
ya5
From the equation of these, reduced to a common denomination, and drop-
ping the denominator, the value of cdlaca is had ni 2 pi 9 ru 50. The
ca 1
dividend here contains two colours; therefore the value of pitaca is arbitra-
rily assumed four. With this substituting fox pitaca, there results ni 2 rw 14.
ca 1
Hence by investigation of the pulverizer, the quotient and multiplier, with
their additives [multiples of their divisors], are /o 2 r« 14 value of ca
lo 1 ru — of ni
loO ru 4 — of pi
Substituting for cdlaca and the rest, by these their values, in the value of
* In the argument of proportion the sura of the rates as well as of the birds is twenty-four : and
the requisition is a hundred. From some multiple of the argument or money, the number of birds
is to be found. If the birds be found from the argument mulliplied by an equal factor, the sum
of both will not be a hundred : for the sum of the drammas, which are the arguments, multiplied by
four, is ninety-six ; and so is that of the birds multiplied by the same ; and the sum, multiplied by
five, is a hundred end twenty. If indeed they be multiplied by a proportional factor, namely
twenty-five sixths, the sum will no doubt be a hundred ; but the birds will not be entire. There-
fore unequal factors must be used: a different one for the price of the doves ; and another for that
of the cranes ; one for the rate of the geese ; and another for that of the peacocks. Those &ctors
are unknown ; and therefore ydvat-that, &c. are put for them. The rates multiplied are the
prices paid. Then, as three drammas are to five doves, so is the price ya 3 to the number of doves
bought, ya 5. In like manner the numbers of the other birds are found by proportion.
Or put y&vat-tivat, &c. for the prices paid, which are unknown : and thence compute the
number of the birds of each kind by proportion: \\z.ya§ caf ni ^ p'^ i- The solution will be
the same, with this difference, however, that the sum of the birds must be taken by reduction of
the fractions to a common denomination. Cri'shn.
MULTILITERAL EQUATIONS. 235
yavat-tdvat, and dividing by its denominator, the value of ycecat-tkoat is
brought out lo 1 ru 2. Substituting for lohitaca with three arbitrarily
assumed for it, the values of yavat-tavat and the rest come out 1, 8,
3, 4. With these " raising" the birds and their • prices, the answer is
Prices 3 40 21 ^Q Or, by putting four, the values are 2, 6, 4, 4 ; and
Birds 5 56 27 12
the answer is Prices 6 30 28 36 Or, by supposition of five, the values
Birds 10 42 36 12
are 3, 4, 5, 4 ; and the answer Prices 9 20 35 56
Birds 15 28 45 12
Thus, by means of suppositions, a multitude of answers may be obtained.
160. Example:* What number is it, which, being divided by six, has
five for a remainder ; or divided by five, has a residue of four ; or divided
by four, has a remainder of three ; or divided by three, leaves two ?
Let the number heya 1. This, divided by six, has five for a remainder :
division by six being therefore made, the quotient is ca. The divisor, mul-
tiplied by ca, with its remainder five added to it, is equal to ya. From this
equation the value of ya is obtained ca 6 ru 5. In like manner, ni, &c. are
quotients answering to the divisors five and so forth ; and values of ya are
thence obtained : «/5 rM4 pi4> ru3 lo 3 ruQ. From the equation of
yal ya\ ya I
the first and second of these values, a value of ca is deduced, ni 5 rul ;
ca 6
from the equation of the second and third, a value of ni, viz. pi4< ru I ;
ni5
and from that of the third and fourth, a value of pi, namely lo3 rul.
pi4<
Hence,'^ by investigation of the pulverizer, values of lo and pi are
brought out; which, with the additives [derived from the divisors'], are
ha 3 ru ^ of d' Substituting for pi by that value, in the value o
• To illustrate the rule for exterminating a fraction. § 156. Cri'shn.
» It is " last" value : wherefore investigation of the multiplier takes place. § 154. CRfsBN.
' See % 64.
H H 2
236 VI'JA-G ANITA. Chapter VI.
ni, this becomes Art 19 ru7 :* and here dividing it by its denominator, the
value of mI comes out a fraction.* Removing then the fraction by investiga-
tion of the pulverizer, the niultiphcr, with its additive [borrowed from the
divisor,] as found by that method, is srceS ruA. It is the vahie of /la.
Substituting with this for ha in the values of lo and pi,^ they become
swe }5 rw 14 value of />^ Now substituting for pi, with this value, in the
szve20 ru 19 — of lo
value of «/,* and dividing by its denominator, the value of w? is brought out,
without a fraction, srve 12 ru 11. Substituting for 7ii with this value, in
the value of ca, and dividing by the denominator, the value of ca is obtained
swe 10 ru 9. Substituting for ca and the rest, by these values in the several
values of ^fl, it comes out *a'e 60 ru59J
Or [putting ya 1 for the quantity] divided by six and having five for a re-
mainder (§ 160), the quantity is ca6 ru5, as before. This, divided by five,
has a residue of four (§ 160) : put ni for the quotient; and, by the equation
with the divisor multiplied by that quotient and added to the residue
(ni 5 ru 4), there results ni 5 ru I the value of ca in a fractional expres-
ca 6
sion. By investigation of the pulverizer, that value, in an expression not
fractional, becomes pi 5 ru 4. Substituting for ca with this, in the original
value, ca6 ru 5, it is pi 30 ru 29- This again, divided by four, has a re-
mainder of three (§ 1 60) : an equation then being made as before, there re-
sults lo 4 ru 26. Here also, by investigation of the pulverizer, the value
pi 30
of pi is converted into ha 2 rul. Whence, substituting with it, in the
expression pi 30 ru 29, the quantity is found ha 60 ru 59. This again,
* By the rule of three terms : pi I \ ha 3 ru 2 \ pi 4 { ha 12 ru 8. This value of pi 4, with
ml, makes //a 12 ruj. Cri'shk.
* Division by the denominator does not succeed exactly. Su'r.
^ Being the two " last" values. CRfsHN.
* This is inverse substitution, commencing from the " first" or preceding (§ 156), which is her^
7ii. Crishn.
' It comes out the same in all the expressions of the value of ya : and putting nought for sjve
(and thus exterminating the unknown term) the conditions of the question are all answered with
the remaining number. — Su'r. And the quotients or values of co, &c. are 9) I'l 14, 1.9. By the
supposition of one for swe, the number is 119 J and the quotients are 19, 23, 29, and 39. Crishh.
MULTILITERAL EQUATIONS. 237
divided by three, leaves two (§ 160) : and the quantity here comes out the
same. By substituting nought, one, two, &c. a multipUcity of answers
may be obtained.
161. Example: "What numbers, being multiplied respectively by five,
seven, and nine, and divided by twenty, have remainders increashig in pro-
gression by the common difference one, and quotients equal to the re-
mainders.
In this case put the residues yal, yal ru \, ya\ ru 2. They are the
quotients also. Let the first number be ca 1. From this multiplied by five,
subtracting the divisor taken into the quotient, the remainder is ca 5 ya 20.
Making this equal to ya 1, a value oi yavat-tdvat is obtained ca 5. Let
yaJl
the second number be put ni 1. From this multiplied by seven, subtracting
the divisor taken into ya added to one, the result is n't 7 ya 20 rti 20; and
making this equal to ya 1 ru I, a. value of ydvat-tdvat is had ni7 rti 9,\.
ya'2l
Let the third number be pi 1. From this multiplied by nine, subtracting the
divisor taken into ya added to two, the residue is pi 9 ya 20 ru 40; and
making this equal to ya 1 rwS, a value of ydvat-tdvat is found pi 9 ;7<4S.
_y« 21
From the equation of the first and second of these, the value of cdlaca is
«i 7 7'm21 ; and from that of the second and third, the value of n'dacaip
ca 5 rt
pi 9 ru 21. This being " last" value, the investigation of the pulverizer
nil
takes place : and quotient and multiplier, with additives [derived from their
divisors], arc by that method found, lo 9 ''« 6 value of ni Here the additive
lo7 ru7 — of pi
is designated lohitaca;^ and the expressions in their order, arc values of
nilaca axvX pitaca. Substituting for ni by this value, in that of c«, and di-
viding by its denominator, the value of ca comes out fractional lo63 ru2l.
ca5
To make it integer by investigation of the pulverizer, reduce the divi-
' The commentator Su'rtada'sa pursues the operation, without introduction of this symbol
of an unknown : remarking, that it would serve to embarrass and mislead the student.
J38 VI'JA-GAN'ITA. Chapter VI.
dend and additive to their least terms by the common measure twenty-one
[§58], and the values calaca and lohitaca are found ha 63 ru 42 value of ca
ha 5 ru 3 — of /o
Substituting for lohitaca by its value, in the values of n'llaca and pitaca,
these are brought out ha 45 ru 33 value of ni Again, with these values,
ha 35 rw 28 — of pi
ha 53 ru 42 for ca substituting for calaca and the rest in the values o^ y&vat-
ha 45 ru 33 for ni
ha 35 rM28 fov pi
t6vat, and dividing by the appertinent denominators, the value ofya is ob-
tained ha 15 ru 10. Here, as the quotient is equal to the residue, and the
residue cannot exceed the divisor, substitute nought only' for haritaca, and
the quotients are found 10, 11, 12. Deducing ca/aca and the rest from
their values, the quantities are brought out in distinct numbers, 42, 33, 28.
162. Example : What number, being divided by two, has one for re-
mainder ; and, divided by three, has two ; and, divided by five, has three :
and the quotients also, like itself?
Let the number be put ya 1. This, divided by two, leaves one; and the
quotient also, divided by two, has a remainder of one. Let the quotient be
ca2 ru\. The divisor multiplied by this, with addition of the residue,
being equal to ya\, the value oi yavat-tavat is obtained, cfl4 ruS. It
answers one of the conditions. Again, the number, being divided by three,
has a residue of two : and so has the quotient. Put ni 3 ru 2. This, mul-
tiplied by the divisor, and added to the residue, is «? 9 ru%; which is equal
to cfl 4 ruS; whence the value of ca is fractional. Cleared of the fraction
by means of the pulverizer, it becomes pi 9 ru 8 ; with which, substituting
for ca, the number is found pi 36 ru 35. This answers two of the condi-
tions. Again, the same number, divided by five, has a remainder of three ;
and so has the quotient. Put/o5 ru3. This, multiplied by the divisor,
and added to the residue, is /o25 ru 18. Making it equal to pi 36 ru 35,
the value of pi is fractional. Clearing it of the fraction by the pulverizer,
the result is ha 35 ru 3. Substituting with this for pi, the number is found
ha 900 rMl43. Substituting for ha with nought, the number comes out
• Supposing unity, the quotients would come out 25, 26 and 27-— Ram. And would exceed
the divisor 20.
MULTILITERAL EQUATIONS. 239
143.^ Division being made conformably with the conditions of the problem,
the quotients are 71, 47 and 28; and by these the conditions are fulfilled.
163. Example : Say what are the numbers, except six and eight,*
which, being divided by five and six respectively, have one and two for re-
mainder ; and the difference of which, divided by three, has a residue of two;
and their sum, divided by nine, leaves a remainder of five ; and their pro-
duct, divided by seven, leaves six? if thou can overcome conceited proficients
in the investigation of the pulverizer, as a lion fastens on the frontal globes
of an elephant.
In this case, the two numbers, which being divided by five and six, leave
one and two respectively, are put ya5 ru I and i/a 6 ru 2. The difference
of these, divided by three, gives a residue of two. Put ca for the quotient ;
and let the divisor multiplied by that added to the residue (ca 3 ru I) be
equated with the difference i/a I ru I. The value of ya is obtained ca 3
ru 1. The two numbers deduced from substitution of this value are ca 15
ru 6 and ca 1 8 ru 8. Again, the sum of these, divided by nine, leaves five.
Put ni for the quotient ; and let the divisor, multiplied by that and added
to the remainder (niQ ru 9) be equated with the sum ca33 rw 14. The
value of ca is had nig ru9; and is a fraction. Rendering it integer by
ca33
the pulverizer, it becomes pi 3 ru 0. From which the two quantities, de-
duced by substitution, are pi 45 ru 6 and pi 54 ru 8. Again, proceeding
to the product of these, as it rises to a quadratic, the operation is a grand
one.' Wherefore, substituting with unity for pi, the first quantity is made
an absolute number, 51. Again, the product of these, abraded* by seven,
yields pi 3 ru 1. Put lo for the quotient of this dividend by seven to leave
six. The divisor multiplied by that quotient and added to the residue
[lo 7 ru6\ is equal to the abraded product {pi 3 ru 2). Thence, by inves-
' This sentence, which is wanting in two of the collated copies, is found in the margin of one,
and in the text of that which is accompanied by the gloss of Ra'ma-Cbishn'a ; where alone the
subsequent sentence occurs. Both are repeated in his commentary.
* These, furnishing too obvious an answer to the question, (for they fulfil all its conditions,) are
excepted. Crishn.
' It is vain ; for the equation rises to cubic and biquadratic. Sea.
♦ See % 56.
J40 V I'J A- G A N'l T A. Chapter VI.
tigation of a pulverizer as before, the value of pi is found ha 7 ruG.^ The
number deduced by substitution of this comes out Iia 378 7-u 332. The
additive of the former number (pi 45) multiplied by this {ha 7) is its present
additive (ha 315): and thus the first number or quantity with its additive is
brought out Afl 3 1 5 ru 51.
Or else putting an absolute number for the firsts the second is to be
sought.*
164. Example: What number is it which multiplied severally by nine
and seven, and divided by thirty, yields remainders, the sum of which, added
to the sum of the quotients, is twenty-six ?
As the divisor is the same, and the sum of the remainders and quotients
is given, the sum of the multiplicators is for shortness made the multiplier;
and the number is putya 1. This, multiplied by the sum of the multipli-
cators, hi/a 16. Put ca for the sum of the quotients of the division by
thirty. Subtracting the divisor taken into that (ca 30) from the immber
multiplied by the [sum of the] multiplicators (j/a 16); and equating the dif-
ference added to the quotient, with twenty-six,* the value of ya found by
the pulverizer is ni 29 ru 27. As the sum of the remainders and quotients
is restricted, the additive is not to be applied. Substituting therefore with
nought for ni, the value of i/a is 27: and this is the number sought.
1 65. Example : What number being severally multiplied by three, seven,
and nine, and divided by thirty, the sum of the remainders too being divided
by thirty, the residue is eleven?
In this case also, the sum of the multiplicators is made the multiplier, as
before (§ 164): viz. 19. The number is put i/a 1. The quotient ca I.
Subtracting the divisor multiplied by this from the number taken into the
' Equation pi 3 loO ruZ Whence, by subtraction, lo7 ru-i : and, clearing the fraction by
pis lo7 ru 6 ~pi3
means of the pulverizer, the quotient and multiplier are 6 and 2. Whence the values
ia7 ru6 of pi
ha 3 ru2 of lo Si/a. and Ram.
* Putting 6, it is ha 126 ru 8. Or putting 36, it is ha 126 ru 104, Ram,
* 2/a \6 ca 29 ru
3/a ca ru 26 Sua. and Ram.
MULTILITERAL EQUATION. 241
multiplicator, the remainder is t/a 19 ca 30. The sum of the remainders,
abraded by thirty, leaves a residue of eleven. The second condition there-
fore being comprehended in the first, this is equal to eleven; and from such
equation, proceeding as before,' the number comes out ni 30 ru 29>
165. Example: What number being multiplied by twenty-three, and
severally divided by sixty and eighty, the sum of the remainders is a hun-
dred.'' Say quickly, algebraist.
167. Maxim: If more than one colour represent, in a dividend, quo-
tients of a numerator, an arbitrary value is not to be assumed, lest the solution
fail.*
Therefore it must be treated otherwise. In this instance the solutionis to
be managed by distributing the sum of the residues, so as these may be less
tlian their divisors and nothing be imperfect. Accordingly the remainders
are assumed 40 and 60. The number is put i/a 1. This, multiplied by
twenty-three and divided by sixty, gives a quotient: for which put ca. The
divisor taken into that and added to the remainder being equated with this
term i/fl 23, a value of ya is obtained, ca 60 ru 40. In like manner, ano-
ya 23
ther value is had ni 80 ru 60. From the equation of these, the values of ca
ya9.3
and ni are found by the pulverizer, pi 4 ru 3 value of ca Substituting
pi 3 ru 2 of fii
' Equation j/a 19 ca 30 ru Whence value of j/a, ca 30 rail By the pulverizer, the
ya ca ru 11 'i/alg
multiplier and quotient are 18 and 13. Making these the values, and changing the letter, the
number is found ni 30 ru 29. Sua.
* Putting ya 1 for the number, and ca 1 and ni 1 for the quotients, the value of ya is
ca 6o ni 80 ru 100, or reduced to least terms ca 30 ni 40 ru 50 This is to be cleared of
ya id ya 23
the fraction : and, by the rule (§ 155), as there is more than one colour, either ca or ni may be put
arbitrarily any number. But they are quotients of the same dividend or numerator by the divisors
60 and 80. If an absolute number be put for ca the quotient of 60, then ni, the quotient of 80, is
absolute too; being a quarter less. So likewise, if any number be put for ni, the quotient of 80,
then ca, the quotient of 60, is absolute also, being a third more. Such being the case, the solution
woulil not conform to the sum of the remainders given at a hundred. Nor would the answer agree
with the question; if the assumption be arbitrarily made. Cuishn. and Ram.
I I
242 VI'JA-G ANITA. Chapter VI.
with these, the value of ca is brought out, a fraction, pi 240 ru 220 . Clear-
ya 23
ing it of the fraction by the pulverizer, it becomes lo 240 7'u 20.' Or let
the remainders be put 30 and 70. From these the number is deduced lo 240
ru 90.^ In like manner, a multiplicity of answers may be found.
168. Example: Say quickly what is the number, which, added to the
quotient by thirteen of its multiple by five, becomes thirty?
Put ya 1 for the number. This, multiplied by five and divided by thir-
teen, gives a quotient: for which put ca. The quotient and original num-
ber, added together, yal ca 1, are equal to thirty. But this equation does
not answer. For there is no ground of operation, since neither multiplier,
nor divisor, is apprehended. Accordingly, it is said
169. In a case in which operation is without ground or in which it i$
restricted, do not apply the operation : for how should it take effect?'
The solution therefore is to be managed otherwise in this case. If then
the number be put equal to the divisor in the instance, viz. 13, the propor-
tion " as this sum of number and quotient, 1 8, is to the quotient 5, so is 30
to what?" brings out the quotient "^ ; and subtracting this from thirty, the
remainder is the number sought, which thus is found V-
170. Example instanced by ancient authors: a stanza and a half. Three
traders, having six, eight, and a hundred, for their capitals respectively,
bought leaves of betle* at an uniform rate; and resold [a part] so; and dis-
posed of the remainder at one for five panas; and thus became equally rich.
What was [the rate of] their purchase? and what was [that of] their sale?
' Substituting nought for 16, the conditions are answered. Su'r.
* Put ya 1 for the number; and ca 4 and ca 3 for the quotients. Subtract the quotient taken
into its divisor, from the dividend, the remainders are found j/a 23 co 240 They are alike; and,
ya 23 ca 240
as their sum is a hundred, each is equal lo fifty. From this equation, the values of ya and ca arc
brought out, by means of the pulverizer, n't 240 ru 19O value oi ya.
ni 22 ru 18 value of cff. Crishn.
^ Very obscure : butnot rendered more intelligible by the commentators.
♦ Ra'macrishn A reads and interprets data leaves of (N6gaxall'0 piper betle. Another reading
it jihala, fruit.
MULTILITERAL EQUATION. MS'
Put 7/fl 1 for the [rate of] purchase; and let the [rate of] sale be assumed a
hundred and ten. Tlie purchase, multiplied by six and divided by the sale,
gives a quotient; for which put ca 1. Subtracting the divisor multiplied by
this, from the quantity multiplied by six, the remainder is ya 6 ca 110.
This, multiplied by five, and added to the quotient, gives the number of
pafias belonging to the first trader. In like manner the money of the second
and of the third is to be found. Here the quotient is deduced by the pro-
portion ' as six is to ca, so is eight (or a hundred) to what r' The quotient of
eight comes out ca f; and that of a hundred, ca ^j". Subtracting the divi-
sor taken into the quotient, from the dividend, the remainder, multiplied by
five and added to the quotient, gives the paiias appertaining to the second,
ya ^ ca ^^ In like manner the third's money is found, ya ^p- ca ^4^".
These are all equal. Reducing them to a common denomination, and drop-
ping the denominator, and taking the equation of the first and second, and
that of the second and third, the value of ya comes out, alike [both ways],
ca 549 : And, by the pulverizer, it is found n'l 549 ru 0. Substituting
ya 30
with unity for 7ii, the rate of purchase is brought out, 549.*
This, which is instanced by ancient writers as an example of a solution
resting on uuconfined ground, has been by some means reduced to equation ;
' Equation of the 1st and 2d ya 30 ca 549, reduced to a common denomination j^u 90 ca l647
„(, igo eg gi'on ya 120 ca2l96
Wiience value of ya ca 549.
yaSO
Equation of 2d and 3d, ya 120 ca 2196 Whence value of ya ca 23254 and, abridging by
ya 1500 ca 27450 ya 1380
46, ca 549.
ya30
Equation of 1st and 3(1, ya 90 ca l647 Whence value of ya ca 25803 and, abridging by
ya 1500 ca 27450 ya 1410
47, ca 549 Proceeding by the pulverizer, the quotient and multiplier, briefly found under the
ya 30
rule (§ 63), are nl 549 And the value of ya the colour of the divisor, comes out ni 549 ru ;
ni ru
and that of ca, the colour of the dividend, ni 30 ru 0. At 549 betle leaves for a paiia, six bring
3294; eight, 4392 ; and a hundred, 54900: which sold at the rate of 110, fetch 29, 39 and 499;
leaving remainders 104, 102 and 10; and these at the rate of one for five, bring 520, 510 and 50.
Added together, in their order, they make the amount of the sale 549. Ram.
I I 2
244 VI'JA-G ANITA. ChapteeVI.
and such a supposition introduced, as has brought out a result in an unre-
stricted case as in a restricted one. In the like suppositions, when the opera-
tion, owing to restriction, disappoints ; the answer must by the intelligent
be elicited by the exercise of ingenuity. Accordingly it is said,
' The conditions, a clear intellect, assumption of unknown quantities,
equation, and the rule of three, are means of operation in all analysis.'
i
CHAPTER VII.
VARIETIES OF QUADRATICS.'
Next, varieties of the solution involving extermination of the middle
term are propounded.
171 — 174. Rule beginning with the latter half of the concluding stanza
[in the preceding rule, § 156] : three and a half stanzas. Equal subtraction*
having been made, when the square and other terms of the unknown re-
main, let the square-root of the one side be extracted in the manner before
directed ;' and the root of the other, by the method of the affected square,*
and then, by the equation of the two roots, the solution is to be completed.
173. If the case be not adapted to the rule of the affected square, make
the second side of equation equal to the square of another colour, and find
the value of the colour, and so the value of the first, through the affected
square. By ingenious algebraists many different ways are to be devised: so
as to render the case fit for the application of that method.
174. For their own elemental sagacity (assisted by various literal sym-
bols) which has been set forth by ingenious ancient authors,' for the in-
* Ma<rh]/amdharana-bAeda: varieties of quadratie» &c. equations. See Cli. 5.
'■ Sama-sod'hana, tulya-sudd'hi, equal subtraction ; or transposition, with other preparations of
the equation. See § 101. Ch. 4.
5 SeeCh.5. § 128 and 131.
♦■Ch.3,
' BRAHMEGurrA andCHATuRVEDA.andlhereit, — Si/R,.meaningCHATUKVKDA Pbit'hu'daca,
VHAni the scholiast of Brahmecupta.
24G VI'JA-GAN'ITA. Chapter VII.
struction of men of duller intellect, irradiating the darkness of mathematics,
has obtained the name of elemental arithmetic'
After equal subtraction has been made, if a square of the unknown with
other terms remain, then the square-root of the one side of the equation is to
be extracted in the manner before taught (§ I'SS). If the square of an un-
known with unity stand on the other side, two roots are to be found for this
side of the equation by the method of the affected square (Ch. 3). Here the
number, which stands with the square of the colour, is (pracrUi) the coeffi-
cient affecting it.' And the absolute number is to be made the additive.
In this manner, the " least" root is the value of the colour standing with the
coefficient, and the " greatest" is that of the root of the whole square.
Making, therefore, an equation to the root of the first side, the value of the
preceding colour is to be thence brought out.
But, if there be on one side of the equation, the square of the unknown
with the [simple] unknown, or only the [simple] unknown with absolute
number, or without it ; such is not a case adapted for the method of the af-
fected square : and how then is the root to be found ? The text proceeds
to answer ' If the case be not adapted, &c.' (§ 173). Making it equal to the
square of another colour, the root of one side of the equation is to be ex-
tracted as before ; and two roots, by the rule of the affected square, to be
investigated, of the other side : and here also, the " least" is the value of the
colour belonging to the coefficient, and the "greatest" is square-root of the
side of the equation. Then duly making an equation of the roots, the values
of the colours are to be thence found.
If nevertheless, though the second side be so treated, the case be still not
adapted to the rule, the intelligent, devising by their own sagacity, means
of bringing it to the form to Avhich the rule is applicable, must discover
values of the unknown.
If they are to be discovered by the mere exercise of sagacity, what occa-
sion is there for algebra? To this doubt, the text replies (§ 174). Because
sagacity alone is the paramount elemental analysis : but colours (or symbols)
• Vija-mati, causal sagacity : for nothing can be discovered, unless by ingenuity and penetration.
Vija-ga/iila, causal calculus : from vija, primary cause, and ganita, computation. SuR.
• The number Conca) or coefficient is the pracrltti, or subject aflTecting the colour or symbol
that is squared. SeeCh. 3. under § 75. '
VARIETIES OF QUADRATICS. 247
are its associates ; and therefore ancient teachers, enhghtening mathemati-
cians as the sun irradiates the lotus, have largely displayed their own saga-
city, associating with it various symbols : and that has now obtained the
name of (Vija-ganita) elemental arithmetic. This indeed has been suc-
cinctly expresssed by a fundamental aphorism in the Siddhanta ;^ but has
been here set forth at somewhat greater length for the instruction of youth.
175 — 176. Rule : When the square-root of one side of the equation has
been extracted, if the second side of it contain the square of an imknown
quantity together with unity (or absolute number); in such case "greatest"
and " least" roots are then to be investigated by the method of the affected
square. Making the " greatest" of these two equal to the square-root of the
first side of the equation, the value of the first colour is thence to be found,
in the manner which lias l)een taught. The " least" will be the value of the
colour that stands with the coefficient. Thus is the rule of afitcted square
to be here applied by the intelligent.
The meaning has been already explained.
177. Example: What number, being doubled and added to six times its
square, becomes capable of yielding a square-root? tell it quickly, alge-
braist !
Put ya for the number. Doubled, and added to six times its square, it
becomes j/fl 17 6 ya9,. It is a square. Put it equal to the square of ca ; and
the statement of equation h yav 6 ya9. cavO Equal subtraction being
ya V yaO cav I
made and the two sides being multiplied by six, and superadding imity, the
square-root of the first side found as before is ya6 ru 1. The roots of the
second side, investigated by the rule of the afi'ected square, are L 2 G 5
or L 20 G 49-'' Here the " greatest" of two roots is the square-root of the
second side of the equation. From the equation of that value (5 or 49)
with the root of the first side ya6 ru I, the value of ya is found -f or 8*
' See quotation from Chapter on Spherics under § 110.
^ Assume the least root 2. Its square 4, multiplied by the coefficient 6, is 24. Added to 1, it
affords the root 5. Statement: C6 L2 G5 Al Whence, by composition (§ 77), 1 20 g 49.
L2 Go A 1 SuR. and Ram.
248 VIJ'A-G ANITA. Chaptek VII.
The "least" of the pair of roots (either 2 or 20) is the vahie of ca, the sym-
bol standing with the coefl[icient. The number sought then is the integer 8,
or the fi-action -f ; and, in like manner, by the variety of " least" and
" greatest" roots, a multiplicity of answers may be obtained.
178. Example from ancient authors: The square of the sum of two
numbers, added to the cube of their sum, is equal to twice the sum of their
cubes. Tell the numbers, mathematician !
The quantities are to be so put by the intelligent algebraist, as that the
solution may not run into length. They are accordingly put ya \ ca\
zx\Aya\ cal.^ Their sum is ya9.. Its square j/a w 4. Its cube _yfl ^A 8.
The square of the sum added to the cube is ya gh 8 ya v 4:. The cubes of
the two quantities respectively are ya gh 1 ya v. ca bh 3 ca v. ya bh 3
cagh 1 cube of the first; 2iaA ya gh 1 yav.cabh 3 cav.yabh 3 caghl
cube of the second ; and the sum of these is ya gh 2 ca v. yabhS;
and doubled, ya gh 4i cav.yabh l^. Statement for equal subtraction:
yaghS yav 4i cav.yabh After equal subtraction made, depressing
yaghAs yav cav.yabh 19,
both sides by the common divisor ya, and superadding unity, the root of the
first side of equation is j/a 2 ru \. Roots of the other side (cav 12 ru 1)
are investigated by the rule of the affected square,^ and are L2 G/ or
X28 G97. " Least" root is a value of ca. Making an equation of a
" greatest" root with ya 2 ru 1, the value of ya is obtained : viz. 3 or 48.
Substitution being made with the respective values, the two quantities come
out 1 and 5, or 20 and 76, and so forth.
179 — 180. Rule: a stanza and a half. Depressing the second side of
the equation by the square, if practicable, let both roots be investigated :
and then multiply " greatest" by "least." Or, if it were depressed by the
biquadrate, multiply " greatest" by the square of " least." The rest of the
process is as before.
' They are so put, as that one condition of the problem be fulfilled. Su'r. and Ram.
■^ Put 2 for " least" root. Its square 4, multiplied by the coefficient 12, is 48 : which, added
to 1, yields a square-root 7. Statement: C12 L2 G7 Al Whence, by composition
L2 G 7 A 1
(§77), 138 g97. ' Su'R,audRAM.
J
VARIETIES OF QUADRATICS. 249
The rule is clear in its import.
181. Example : Tell me quickly, mathematician, the number, of which
tlie square's square, multiplied by five and lessened by a hundred times the
square, is capable of yielding a square-root.
Here the number is put ya\. Its biquadrate, multiplied by five, and
lessened by a hundred times the square of the number, h yaw 5 yav 100.
It is a square. Put it equal to the square of ca, and the root of the square
of ca is ca 1. Depressing the second side of the equation, namely ^a w t; 5
yavlOO, by the common divisor, square of j^a, the roots, investigated by
the rule of the affected square,' come out L 10 G 20 or Z 170 G 380.
Depression by the square having taken place, multiply "greatest" root by
" least" (§ 179) ; and thus " greatest" is brought out 200 or 646OO. This is
the value of ra. " Least" root is the value of the colour joined with the co-
efficient : and that is the number sought: viz. 10 or 170.
182. Example: Most learned algebraist! tell various pairs of integer
numbers, the difference of which is a square, and the sum of their squares
a cube.
Put the two numbers ya 1 and ca 1. Their difference is ya 1 ca 1.
Making it equal to the square of ni, the value of ya is had, ca \ nivl.
Substituting with this for ya, the two quantities become ca 1 7iiv 1 and ca 1.
The sum of their squares is caw 2 niv. ca bh9, nivvl. It is a cube.
Make it then equal to the cube of the square of ni ;- and, subtraction
taking place, there results, in the first side of equation, niv gh\ nivv \;
and, in the second, ca f 2 ni v. ca bh 2. Multiplying both sides by two
and superadding the biquadrate of ni, the square-root of the second side of
' Assumv the "least" root 10. Its square 100, multiplied by the coefficient 5, is 500. This,
added to the number 100 with the negative sign, makes 400. Its root -20 is " greatest" root.
Statement C 5 L 10 G (-20, or, depression by the square having previously taken place,)
200 A 100. SuR. and Ram.
So from the above (C 5 LlO G 20 A 100), by §77, there results c5 ll g2 ai:
whence, by composition of like (§ 77), i * G 9 A \ ; and, by composition of unalike (ib.)
C5 LlO G20 A 100 roots are deduced Z 170 ^380 a 1*00.
L 4. G 9 A \
* This is a limitation more than is contained in the problem.
K K
250 TI'JA-G ANITA. Chapter VII.
the equation is caQ nivl. Depressing the first side by the biquadrate of
ni as common divisor, to niv 2 ru 1, the roots investigated by the rule of
affected scjuare,* are L 5 G7; orZ29 G41. Then multiplying " greatest"
by square of" least," conformably to the rule (§ 180), it comes out G 175,
or 34481. "Least" root is the value of «i. Substituting with tliat, the
former root becomes ca 2 ra25;orca2 rw 841. Making an equation of
this with " greatest" root, the value of ca is obtained 100 or I766I. Sub-
stituting these values respectively, the pair of numbers is brought out 75
and 100; or 16821 and I766I ; and so forth.
183. Rule : comprised in a stanza and a half. If there be the square of
a colour together with the simple unknown quantity and absolute number,*
making it equal to the square of another colour, find the root ; and, on the
other side, investigate two roots, by the method of affected square, as has
been taught. Consider the " least" as equal to the first root ; and " greatest"
as equal to the second.
The root of the first side of the equation having been taken, if there be
on the other side the square of the unknown with the simple unknown, and
with or without absolute number, make an equation of that remaining side
with the square of another colour and take the root. Then let the roots of
this other be investigated by the rule of affected square. Of the two roots
so investigated, making " least" equal to the root of the first side of equa-
tion, and " greatest" equal to the root of the second, let the values of the
colours be sought.
' Put 5 for " least" root. Its square 25, multiplied by the coefficient 2, makes 50. Subtract-
ing one (.for the negative additive) tlie remainder 49 yields a square-root 7; and the two roots art
5 and 7. — Sua. Ram. By §88 — 89, the roots are 1 and 1. By composition with the above
C2L1GIAI* They are 112 g 17 a 1; and by further composition C2 L 1 G 1 Al
L5 G7 ^i 1 12 gl7 a 1
they are 1^9 g 4,1 al.
' A variation in the reading of this passage is noticed by Su'ryada'sa : viz. avyacta-rdpah in-
stead of sdvyacta-rupah. The meaning, as this is interpreted by him and by Ra'macrishn'a, is, if
there belioth a terra of the unknown and absolute number besides the square of the unknown.
The other reading may be explained as confined to one term (the unknown) besides the square.
See Sua. and Ram. The author himself in his comment dispenses with the third term, or abso-
lute number, which is indeed not necessary to bring the form within the operation of the rule.
VARIETIES OF QUADRATICS. 251
184. Example: Say in what period (or number of terms) is the sum of
a progression continued to a certain period tripled ; its first term being three
and the common difference two ?
In this case the statement of the two progressions is l3 Ds Fyal* The
l3D2Pc«l
sums of these progressions are yav I ya 2t Making three times the first
cavX cal
equal to the second, the two sides of equation are yav 3 ya6 Triphng
cav 1 ca2
both, and superadding nine, the root of the first is found ya 3 ru 3. Making
the second side, namely ca w 3 caQ ru 9, equal to the square of 7ii, the
two sides of equation become cav 3 ca6 Tripling these and superadding
niv I ru9
cine, the root of the first of them is found ca 3 ru3. Roots of the second
(niv 3 ru 18) investigated by the rule of afi^ected square,* are L9 G 15 or
X. 33 G 57.* IMaking equations of " least" with the first root, namely
^fl 2 ruS; and of " greatest" with the second, ca 3 7'u 3 ; the values of ^a
and ca are brought out 2 and 4; or 10 and 18. So in every [like] instance.
185 — 186. Rules: two stanzas. But, if there be two squares of colours,
"with (or without') absolute number, assume one of them at choice as (pra'
criti) the affected square,* and let the residue be additive : and then pro-
ceed to investigate the root in the manner taught, provided there be mpre
than one equation.
186. Or, if there be two squares of colours together with a factum
• The author employs the initials i, u and ga of the words adya, uttara and gachcha, signifying.
Initial term, Difference and Period (or number of terms) of a progression. See Lil. Ch. 4.
•f- By the rule in the Lildvali, for the sum of a progression. Lil. § lip.
' One copy here inserts, *L3 G5 A 2 and, making the additive ninefold, Lp G 15 A 18.'
This indication of the manner of finding the roots is, however, wanting in other collated copies of
the text.
• Assume 9 for " least" root : its square 81, multiplied by the coefficient 3, is 2i3 : from which
subtract 18 for the negative additive; and the remainder 225 gives the square-root 15. Sua.
' Collated copies exhibit "with:" but the commentator reads and interprets "without;"
(ar&pace instead ofaarupacSJ. The author's own comment may countenance either reading.
• See note at the beginning of Ch. 3.
K K 2
SS2 Vl'JA-GAN'ITA. Chapter VII.
(bh&vita) ; taking the square-root [of so much of it as constitutes a square]
let the root be made equal to half the difference between the residue, divided
by an assumed quantity, and the quantity assumed.
The root of the first side of equation having been taken, if there be on
the second side two several squares of colours with or without unity (or any
absolute number), make one square of a colour the subject (pracrlti),' and let
the rest be the additive. Then, proceeding by the rule (§ 73) let a multiple
(by one, or some other factor,) of the same colour which occurs in the addi-
tive, or such colour with a number (one, or another,) added to it, be put
for the " least" root, selected by the calculator's own sagacity ; and thence
find the "greatest" root (§ 75). If the coefficient be an exact square, the
roots are to be sought by the rule (§ 95) 'The additive divided by an assumed
quantity, &c.'
If there be a (bh&vita) product of colours, then by the above rule (§ 186)
the root of so much of the expression as affords a root is to be taken ;* and
that root is to be made equal to the half of the difference between the quo-
tient of the residue divided by an assumed quantity and that assumed quan-
tity.'
But, if there be three or more squares or other terms of colours, then re-
serving two colours selected at pleasure, and putting arbitrary values for the
rest, let the root [of the reserved] be investigated.
This is to be practised when there is more than one equation. But, if
there be only one ; then reserving a single colour, and putting arbitrary
values for the rest, let the root be sought as before.
1 87. Example : Tell two numbers, the sum of whose squares multi-
plied by seven and eight respectively yields a square-root, and the difference
does so being added to one.
Let the numbers be put ya 1, ca\. The sum of these squares multiplied
respectively by seven and eight, is yav7 ca v 8. It is a square. Making
' See note at the beginning of Ch. 3.
* The term consisting of the product of two factors raay be thus exterminated, taking with it
squares of both colours with proper coefficients to complete the square. — See Sua.
' This is grounded on the rule of § 95. The compound square has unity for coefficient ; and
the residue is the additive ; the " least" root, which is the root of that square, is deduced from the
additive by the rule cited; and needs no division, the square-root of the coefficient being unity.
VARIETIES OF QUADRATICS. 25S
it equal to square of ni, and subtracting; the two sides of equation are
yav7 Adding eight times the square of ca, the root of the second
cav h niv \
side of equation is ni 1 ; and roots of the first side, viz. yav7 cav8, are to
be investigated by the method of the affected square. Here the number
(anca), which is joined with the square of i/a, is (pracnti) the subject af-
fecting it: the residue is additive: C7, A caw 8* Roots found by the
rule (§ 75), assuming ca% are L, ca9.; and G, ca6. " Greatest" root is a
value of ni ; "least"' is so of ya. Substituting with it fox ya, the two num-
bers become ca 2, c« 1 . Again the difference of the squares of these multi-
plied respectively by seven and eight, together with one added to it, is
cav9.0 ru\. It is a square.^ Proceeding then as before, " least" root
comes out 2 or 36. This is a value of ca. Substituting with it, the two
numbers are obtained : viz. 4 and 2 ; or 72 and 36.
188. Example : Bring out quickly two numbers such, that the sum of
the cube [of the one] and square [of the other] may be a square ; and the
sum of the numbers themselves be likewise a square.
Put the numbers ya\ ca\. The sum of the square and cube of these is
yavl ca gh\. It is a square. Making it equal to the square of ni and
adding cube of ca, the root of one side is ni 1 ; and, of the other (viz. yavl
ca gh 1) roots are to be sought by the method of the affected square. The
number, which is joined with the square of ya, is the coefficient ; the rest
is the additive : C, yav \ A,cagh\. Then, by the rule (§95), taking ca
for the assumed quantity under that rule, the two roots come out cav\ ca\
and cav^ ca^. " Least" root is value of ya. Substituting with it for ya,
the two numbers are cav^ ca\ and ca 1. The sum of these \scav\ ca\'
It is a square. Making it then equal to pi; and multiplying both sides by
• If the "least" root be put ca2; the "greatest," as inferred from it, (§75) is ca 6.— Su'r.
Square of 2 multiplied hy pracrUi 7, is 28 ; and, with the additive, 36; the square-root of which
» 6. Ram.
Put it equal to square of;>;; and proceed to investigate the root of ca r 20 ru 1. Assume for
" least" root 2. Its square 4, multiplied by 20 and added to ], is 81 : the square-root of which is
p. Then by composition of like (§ 77) C 20 L 2 G9 A 1 other roots are deduced 1 3(5 [g l6"l],
L2 Gp Al Sun. and Ram.
854 VrJA-G ANITA. Chapter VII.
four,* and adding unity, the root of the first side is ca 2 rul; and roots of
the second (viz. p'lvS ru 1) investigated by the method of the affected
square are 6 and 17,* or 35 and 99. Making "greatest" root ecjual to the
root of the foregoing side of equation {ca 2 ru I) the value of ca comes out
8 or 49. Substituting therewith, the two numbers are found 28 and 8, or
11 76 and 49.
Or let two numbers be put ya vQ yav 7. The sum of these is of itself
obviously a square, ya v 9- The sum of the cube and square of these is
ya V gh S yavc 49- It is a square. Make it equal to square of ca. De-
pressing the side of the equation by the biquadrate o^ ya, and proceeding as
before taught,' the value of ^a is obtained 2, or 7, or 3. Substituting there-
with, the two numbers are found 8 and 28 ; or 98 and 343; or 18 and 63.*
I89. Example: Tell directly two numbers such, that the sum of their
squares, added to their product, may yield a square-root : and their sum,
multiplied by that root and added to unity, may also be a square.
Let the numbers be put j/a 1, ca 1. The sum of their squares, added to
their product, is yav I ya. ca bh\ cav \. This has not a square-root.
Therefore putting it equal to square of ni, and adding square of ca,^ and
multiplying by thirty-six, the root of the side involving ni is obtained, viz.
ni 6 ; and the other side is ya v 36 ya. ca bh 36 cav 36: in which the root
of so much of it as affords a square-root is to be taken by the preceding rule
(§ 186) viz. ya6 ca 3, and the residue, namely ca v 27, being divided by ca
as an assumed quantity [§ 95], and from the quotient the same assumed
' After reducing to a common denomination and dropping tbe denominator. — Ram. Multiply-
ing both sides by eight. SuR.
■* The commentators (Su'r. and Ram.) direct 6 to be put ; and proceeding by § 75, deduco
G 17. But, if 1 were put tentatively, it would answer; G being in that case 3 ; and the further
pair of roots is derived from composition of these sets by § 77, viz. C. 8 I^ 1 G 3 A 1 whence
L6 G\7 A I
by cross multiplication, &c. 135 g 99 »!• The lower numbers seem to have been omitted by
the author and commentators, because the numbers sought (ca being 1) would come out and 1,
which they consider to be unsatisfactory for an answer.
' See §180.
♦ Put 2, 3 or 7 for "least" root: the "greatest" is 9, 11 or 21; which multiplied by th»
square of" least" ($ 180) give 36, ^9, or 1029.
* That is, bringing it back, after subtraction, to the same side on which it first stood.
k
VARIETIES OF QUADRATICS. 255
quantity being subtracted, and the remainder halved [ibid.], gives ca \3 ;
■which, made equal to that root, brings out the value ofya ; viz. ca 4. Sub-
stituting with this, the two numbers are found ca^ and ca 1. The sum of
their squares cav ^*, added to their product cav f, is cav V : the square-
root of which is ca \. The sum of the numbers, ca f , multiplied by this,
with unity added, is ca v *-/ ru ^. Making this equal to the square of pi,
" least" root' found by investigation, is 6 or 180. It is the value of ca.
Substituting with it, the two numbers come out 10 and 6 ; or 300 and 180.
In like manner a multiplicity of answers may be obtained.
190. Example of a certain ancient author.* Tell me quickly, algebraist,
two numbers such, that the cube-root of half the sum of their product and
least number, and the square-root of the sum of their squares, and those ex-
tracted from the sum and difference increased by two, and that extracted
from the difference of their squares added to eight, being all five added to-
gether, may yield a square-root : excepting, however, six and eight.
The conditions of the problem being numerous, the solution, unless at
once, does not succeed. The intelligent algebraist must therefore so put
the quantities, as that all the conditions may be answered by one symbol.'
Accordingly the two quantities are put yav \ ru\ and ya 2. The cube-
root of half the sum of their product and the least number is ya\. The
square-root of the sum of their squares \s yavl ru ]. The square-root of
their sum [increased by two] is ya 1 ru\. The square-root of their differ-
ence [increased by two] \s ya \ ru I. The square-root of the diff'erence of
their squares [with eight added] is yav I ru 3.
The sum of these [five] is yav 2 ya 3 ruk. It is a square. Make it
equal to square of ca. Multiplying both sides of equation by eight, and
adding the absolute number nine,* the root of the first side is ya^ ru3;
• By rule § 75, put 6; and proceeding as there indicated, its square 36, multiplied by the co-
efficient «5p, is l£±& ; and, with the additive (§), S-'^'* : of which the root is V i o"", abridged, 15.
Therefore L6 G 15, and by composition (§ 77) L 180 G 449. Sua. Ram.
* Introduced to exhibit facility of solution. Ram.
* The two quantities must be put such, that the five roots, which are prescribed, may be pos-
sible. SuR.
♦ See§ 131^
256 VI'JA-G ANITA. Chapter VII.
and roots of the other (namely of cavS ru 25) investigated by the method
of the affected square are 5 and 15; or 30 and 85; or 175 and 495.
Making an equation of "greatest" root with the former (yaA, ru 3) the
value ofya is obtained 3, or V, or 123. By substituting with the vaUie so
found, the two numbers come out 8 and 6:or^ and 41 ; or 15128 and
246 ; and in hke manner, many other ways.
Or else one quantity may be put square of yfl added to twice i/a ; and the
other twice ya less two absolute : viz. yav\ ya^ and ya 2 ru 2.
Or one quantity may be put square of ya, less twice ya-, and the other
twice j^fl less absolute two: viz. yav \ ya\ and j/a 2 rM2.
Or one quantity may be square of ya with four times ya and three abso-
lute; and the other twice j/a with four absolute : viz. yav\ ya^ ruS and
ya 2 ru 4.
" As supposition, which thus is a thousand-fold, is to the dull abstruse,
the mode of putting suppositions is therefore unfolded in compassion to
them."
191 192. Rule: two stanzas. Let the root of the difference be first
put, an unknown number, with or without absolute number: that root of
the' difference, added to tlie square-root of the quotient of the additive of
the difference of squares divided by the additive of the difference of the
numbers, will be the root of the sum. The squares of these with their ad-
ditives subtracted, are the difference and sum : from which the numbers arc
found by the rule of concurrence.'
193. Example: Tell me, gentle and ingenuous mathematician, two
numbers, besides six and seven, such that their sum and their difference,
with three added to each, may be squares ; that the sum of their squares less
four, and the difference of their squares with twelve added, may also be
squares ; and half the product less the smaller number may be a cube ; and
the sum of all their roots, with two added, may likewise be a square.
Put the symbol of the unknown less unity for the root of the differ-
ence : viz. yal ru\. Then by that analogy (and according to the last
rule) the two numbers are put yav\ rul and ya9..* The roots are
■ Lil. § 55. .
* Put for the root of the difference with three added to render it square, yal rul. Add the
VARIETIES OF QUADRATICS. 257
j/fl 1 ru I ; ya \ /'w 1 ; yav\ ; yav \ rw 4 ; ya\- The sum of these, with
two added to it, \syav9. ya3 ru*-!. It is a square. Let it be equal to'
square of ca. The two sides of equation become yav 9. ya3 Multiplying
ca v \ ru'2
by eight and adding nine, the root of the first side is ya 4 ru 3; and the
roots of the second (ca v 8 ru 25) by the method of the affected square are
L5 G 15 or Z 175 G495.* "Greatest" root being equal to the former
root i^ya 4 ru 3), the value of ya is obtained 3 or 1 23 ; and, substituting
with these values, the two numbers come out 7 and 6 or 15127 and 246.t
194. Example by an ancient author :' Calculate and tell, if you know,
two numbers, the sum and difference of whose squares, with one added to
each, are squares : or which are so, with the same subtracted.
In the first example, let the squares of the numbers be put yav ^s and
yav 5 ru\. The sum and difference of these with unity added, afford
each a square-root. Tlie square-root of the first assumed quantity is one of
the numbers, Viz.ya^. Roots of the second, namely j/a 1*5 ru\, investi-
gated by the method of the affected square,* are 1 and 2, or S7 and 38. Of
these, " greatest" root is the second number, and " least" is a value of ya ;
from which the first number is deducible. Substituting then with that value,
the two numbers arc 2 and 2, or 34 and 38.
square-root of the quotient of the additive of difference of squares by the additive of difference of
numbers, viz. ru2, the sum is ^a 1 rul; the root of the sum with three added to render it
square. Their squares are yav I yai ru \ and yav I ya2 rul; and, subtracting the addi-
tives of the sum and difference, there remain the sum and difference of the numbers, ya v I ya 2
ru'2 and yav\ ya 1 ru2. Half the sum and difference of these are the numbers themselves.
* By § 75, the first roots are had by position : the next by combination, under § 77-
t The same is found by the process of the foregoing rule. Let the root of the difference be put
122. Divide the additive of the difference of the squares, by the additive of the numbers, 12 by 3 ;
the quotient is 4. Its square-root is 2. Add this to the root of the difference, the result is the
root of the sum: (2 added to 122; making 124.) The squares of these, less the additives, give the
sum and difference : 14881 and 15373. Whence, by the rule of concurrence (,Lil. §55) the two
numbers are deduced, 15127 and 246. Sun. and Ram.
^ It comprises two distinct examples. Su'ii.
♦ Put tentatively 1 for "least" root; and the " greatest" by §75 is found 2. Then combining
like roots (577), there result L 4 G 9. Combining these dissimilar roots (ibid.) others result
adapted to the second example 1 17 g38; or, combining like, 111 g \G\.
L L
258 VIJA-GANITA. Chapter VII.
In the second example, similarly, the fust number is ya 2 ; and, for the
second, roots are to be investigated from this yav5 ru 1, by the method of
the affected square. They are 4 and 9 ; or 72 and l6l. With "least" the
first root (or number,) is raised ; and " greatest" is the second. Thus the
two numbers come out 8 and 9 ; or 144 and 16 1.
Here such number, as, with the least, whether added or subtracted, yields
a square-root, must be the second coefficient.' The way to find it is as follows.
Let the least square quantity [that is, the coefficient] be put 4. The se-
cond, with this added or subtracted, must afford a scjuare-root. Being dou-
bled, it is 8. This is the difi^erence of the squares of certain two numbers ;
and it is consequently equal to the product of the sum and difference. The
difference of the numbers, therefore, is assumed 2: and by the rule (Z?/. § 57)
for finding two numbers from the difference of squares, and difference of the
numbers, the roots of the difference of squares and of the sum of the squares
are found 1 and 3. Adding the least square quantity to the square of the
first, or subtracting it from the square of the second, there results the second
[viz. 5]. Here the least square quantity must be so devised, as that the se-
cond may be an integer.
Or, in like manner, another is assumed 36. Doubled, it is 72. This is
the difi'erence of two squares: and six being put for the difference of the
numbers, the second is brought out 45. Or, with four put, it comes out 85 ;
or, with two, 325.*
Or else another ground of assumption may be shown, as follows. The
sum of the squares with twice the product of the two quantities added or
subtracted, must afford a root. That twice the products of two quantities
may be an exact square, one should be put a square, and the other half a
square; for the product of squares is square. Thus they are assumed, one a
square, the other half a square: lands. Twice their product is 4. This is
least square number [or coefficient]. The sum of their squares is 5. This is
second quantity.
Or let the one square, and the other half square, be 9 and 2. Twice their
product is 36. This is the least square number. The sum of the squares is
85. This is second quantity.
' Tdtad-iyacta, the known number annexed to t/kat (or ydvat-iivat) the unknown quantity,
See the author's remark towards the close of his comment.
* And similarly a multiplicity may be found. Sua.
VARIETIES OF QUADRATICS. 259
These known numbers are multiplied by square of yavat-tdvat : and, in
the first example, the second quantity has unity subtracted from it; in the
second example, it must have the same added to it. So doing, those two
square quantities are so contrived as to fulfil both conditions of the problem.
But having extracted the square root of the first, the root of the second is to
be found by the method of the affcctetl square, as before observed.
Thus [the problem is solved] many ways.
195 — 196. Rule: two stanzas. In such instances, if there remain the
[simple] unknown with absolute number, find its value by making it equal
to the square or [other power] of another symbol with unity :* and substi-
tuting with this value in [the expression of] the quantity, proceed to the
further operation,' making the root of the former equal to the other symbol
and unity. '
After the root of the first side of the equation has been taken, if there be,
on the other side, the simple unknown with absolute number, or without it;
In such case, making an equation with the square of another colour Avith
unity, and thence bringing out the value of that unknown, and substituting
with this value in the expression of the quantity, proceed again to the fur-
ther operation ; and, in so doing, make an equation of the root of the first
side with the other symbol and unity. But, if there be no further operation,
then the equation is to be made with a known square and so forth.
197. Example: If thou be expert in the extirpation of the middle term
in analysis, tell the number, which being severally multiplied by three and
five, and having one added to the product, is a square.
In this case put the number 3/fl I. This, tripled, with one added, is ya 3
ru \. It is a square. Making it equal to square of cc, and adding unity on
both sides, [to replace it on its original side,] the root of the side of equation
containing ca is c« 1. Making the other side, namely i/rt 3 ru \, equal to
' Since the root cannot in such ca.se be sought by the rule of Chapter 3, as there is not an af-
fected square : for the simple unknown only remains: hut (pracrcti) an affected square consists in
a square of the unknown. Its root therefore can only be possible by equating it with the square
of some quantity whatsoever. Sur.
* Not, if no further operation depend: for the value would be an unknown. But make it equal
to a known square, &c. and thus the value is absolute. Ram.
L L 2
260 VIJA-GANITA. Chapter VII.
the square of thrice n't joined with unity, viz. niv 9 ni 6 ru 1, the value
ofya is obtained; substituting with which the number conies out ni v 3
ni 2. Again, this multipUed by five, with one added to the product, is
nl V 15 ni 10 ru I. It is a square. Making it equal to square of pi, the
equation after Hke subtraction is ni v 15 ni 10 Multiplying both sides by
piv 1 ru 1
fifteen and adding twenty-five, the root of the first side is ni 15 ru5. Roots
of the second, viz. pi v 15 ru 10, investigated by the method of theaflFected
square,' arc 9 and 35, or 71 and 275. " Least" is the value of pi. " Greatest"
being equal to the root of the first side of the equation ni \5 ru 5, the value
of ni comes out 2 or 18. Substituting with its value for it, the number is
found, 16 or 1008.
Or let the number be 7/a 1 ; and, as this tripled, with one added, is a square,
make it equal to square of ca; and, after equal subtraction, find the value of
1/a; which, substituted accordingly, gives for the number ca v ^ ru •§■. Or
let its value be so put at the first, that one of the conditions may be of itself
fulfilled, cav-^ ru ^. This multiplied by five, with one added to the pro-
duct, cav ^ fu^, yields a square root. Making it equal to square of ni,
the root of the side involving ni being extracted hni 1; and the roots of the
other side cav ^ ru f, being investigated by the method of the affected
square, are 7 and S). " Least" is value of ca, and substituting with it (in
ca V \ ru -f) the number is found 16; the same as before.
198. Example by an ancient author: What number, multiplied by three,
and having one added to the product, becomes a cube; and the cube-root,
squared and multiplied by three, and having one added, becomes a square?
Let the number be put j/a 1. This tripled, with one added, is j/a 3 ru 1.
It is a cube. Making it equal to cube of ca, the value of j/a is found
' Put 1 for " least" root: the " greatest" by rule § 75 is 5. Then by composition
Cl5 Ll G5 A 10 other roots are found, L 10 G 40 ^ 100 ; whence, by § 79, ll g4 al;
Ll G5 AlO
and by composition C 15 Ll G5 A 10 liiie roots are /p g 35 a 10; and by further corabina-
1 1 g4 a 1
tion C 15 19 g35 a 10 they come out ^71 y275 #10. That is, 1 and 5 ; or 9 and 35; or
1 1 g 4 a 1
71 and 275. The first pair is not noticed, apparently because the number thence deduced would
be cipher.
VARIETIES OF QUADRATICS. 2G1
ca gh 1 ru 1 The cube-root of three times that, with unity added to the
3
product, being squared and tripled, and having one added to it, hcav3 ru\.
It is a square. Put it equal to square of wi 3 ru I: and the equation is
cav 3 Adding unity to both sides, the root of the second side is
ni V 9 niS
ni 3 7'u 1; and those of the other, investigated by the method of the af-
fected square,' are L4 G 7- Substituting as before with the value of ca,'
the number comes out 21 (or ^^).
199. Example: Say quickly what are two numbers, of which, as of six
and five, the difference of the squares being severally multiplied by two and
by three, and having three added to the products, shall in both instances be
square,?
200. Maxim; Intelligent calculators commence the work sometimes from
the beginning [of the conditions], sometimes from the middle, sometimes
from the end; so as the solution may be best effected.'
In this instance, let the difference of squares be putt/a 1. This doubled,
with three added, (ya 2 ru 3) is a square. Make it equal to square of ca;
and with the value of 3/a thence deduced, substitute for the quantity, which
thus becomes ca v I ru3. This again tripled, with three added, is a square.
2
Make it equal to square o£ ni; and, like subtraction taking place, the sides
of equation are ca v 3 ru Multiplying them by three, the root of the
ni w 2 ru 3
first is ca 3; and the roots of the second (tii v6 ru 9) investigated by the
' Put 1 for " least" root, the greatest is 2 by § 75. Then by composition of like, another pair
of roots is thence found (§ 77) L 4 G 7 ; and by combination of unalike, another pair 1 1 5 g 26'. —
Su'r. The first pair is unnoticed as it would here also bring out the number required, a cipher.
* III the expression ca g/< 1 ml. Cubeof4is64; less one, is 63; divided by 3, is 21. — Su'u,
o
So cube of 15 is 3375; less one, is 3374 ; divided by 3, is 111*.
' Sometimes assumption is commenced by intelligent persons from the beginning of the condi-
tions as enunciated ; sometimes from the middle ; sometimes from the end, by inversion : so as the
work of solution be accomplished. That is, in the instance, the difference only is put as unknown ;
without putting the numbers themselves so. SuR. Ram.
j36a VI'JA-GAN'ITA. Chapter VII.
nictlwxl of the affi-cted square,' are 6 and 15, or 60 and 147. " Greatest"
being equalled to the [root of the] first side, the value of ca is obtained 5, or
49. And substituting with this value, the difference of squares comes out
11, or 1199.' Then by the rule (Lil. §37) for finding two numbers from
difference of squares and difference of the simple quantities, putting unity
for their difference, the two numbers are found, 5 and 6, or 599 and 6OO:
or, putting eleven for their difference, the two numbers are 49 and 60.
201. Rule: a stanza and a half If the simple unknown be multiplied
by the quantity which was divisor of the square, &c. [on the other side] ; then,
that its value may in such case be an integer, a square or like [term] of ano-
ther symbol must be put equal to it: and the rest [of the operations] will be
as before taught.
In the case of a square, &c. and in that of a pulverizer or the like, after the
root of one side of the equation has been taken, if there be on the other side
an unknown multiplied by the quantity which was divisor of the square, &c.
the square and other term of another symbol together M'ith absolute number
added or subtracted, must be put equal to it; that so its value may come
out integer. The rest [of the steps] are as taught in the preceding rides.
202. Example : What square, being lessened by four and divided by
seven, yields no remainder? or what other square, lessened by thirty ? If
thou know, tell promptly.
Put the number i/a 1. Its square, less four, and divided by seven, is ex-
hausted. Let the quotient be ca. Making an equation of the divisor mul-
tiplied by that, with this yav 1 ru 4, the root of the first side hi/a 1.
Since the other side, ca 7 rM4, yields no root, put it equal to square of
seven ni and two absolute. The value of ca is had without a fraction niv7
ni 4 : and the quantity put is the root of the second side of equation, or
ni7 ru2. This being equal to the root of the first side, or^a 1, the value
• The lowest number, which answers for " least" root, found by position (§ 75) is 6 ; and the
corresponding "greatest" is 15. From which by §79 are deduced L 2 G 5 A 1; and by combi-
nation of uiialike (§ 77) C 6 L 6 G 15 A 9, another pair of roots is derived 1 60 g 147 a 9-
L2 G 5^1
» Square of 49 is 2401 ; which, less 3, is 2398 ; and halved, II99.
' The unfinished stanza is completed at § 208.
VARIETIES OF QUADRATICS. 263
of ya is ni 7 ru 2, with the additive. It comes out 9 ;^ and the square of
this will be the number sought, 81.
For the instruction of the dull, the way, which is to be be followed in the
selection of another symbol, is set forth by ancient authors.
203 — 205. Rule: three stanzas. Choosing a number such that its square,
divided by the divisor, may yield no residue, as also the same number, mul-
tiplied by twice the root of the absolute number; let another colour be put
multiplied by that [as coefficient], and with the root of the absolute numbei-
added to it.
fi04. But, if the absolute number do not yield a square-root, then, after
abrading the number by the divisor, add [to the residue] so many times the
divisor as will make a square.* If still it do not answer, [the problem is] im-
perfect.
205. If by multiplication' or addition the first [side of equation] was
made to afford a square root ; in that case also, the divisor [is to be retained],
as enunciated by the conditions; but the absolute number, as adjusted by
subtraction and so forth, is right.*
Such a number, as that its square divided by the divisor shall be exhausted;
that is, yield no residue ; and the same number multiplied by two and by
the square-root of the absolute number, being divided by the divisor, shall be
in like manner exhausted, yielding no remainder; by such coefficient, let
another colour be multiplied and so be put with the root of the absolute
number. But, if there be not a root of the absolute number, then, the ab-
solute number having been abraded by the divisor, superadd [to the residue]
so many times the divisor as will make a square. Let its square-root be
[used for] the absolute root. Even, with so doing, if a square be not pro-
duced, then that example must be deemed imperfect and wrong. If the
first side of equation multiplied by some number, or with one added to it,
' Putting unity for ni. — Su'k. Supposing 2, it comes out l6; or with 3, it is 23.
* And then proceed according to the foregoing rule, using its root as root of the absolute
number.
' The commentator Su'ryada'sa reads hituA and interprets it ' subtracting ;' but collated copies
of the text exhibit halwd, multiplying: and this seems the preferable reading. See § 128.
♦ For the purpose of the preceding rule (§ 204.).
264 Vl'JA-GAN'ITA. Chapter VII.
afford a square-root ; in such case the divisor should be taken as enunciated,
and not as either multipHcd or divided: but the absolute number is to be
taken precisely as it stands when equal subtraction has beei; made.
The like is also to be understood in the case of a cube: as follows. Such
number, as that its cube divided by the divisor may be exhausted, exhibiting
no residue, and the same number multiplied by three and by the cube-root of
the absolute number, being divided by the divisor, may also be exhausted;
by such coefficient let another colour be multiplied and so be put together
with the cube-root of the absolute number. If there be not a cube-root of
the absolute number, then, after abrading the number by the divisor, add [to
the residue] so many times the divisor, as may make a cube. Then the
cube-root is treated as root of the absolute number. Even with so doing, if
there be not a complete cube, the instance is wrong. This is to be applied
further on.*
To proceed to the second example (§ iiOS). Let the number be put ya 1.
Its square \s yav \. Doing with it as directed, the root of the first side is
ya 1 ; and treating the second side, ca 7 ru 30, as prescribed by the rule
(§ 204), after abrading the absolute number by the divisor, superadding twice
the divisor, viz. 14, the root is ru 4. By making an equation of the square
of seven ni with this added («/' 7 ru 4) the value of ca is obtained niv7 n'l 8
ru 2. But the assumed quantity n'l 7 ru 4 is the root of the second side of
equation, and equal to the root of the preceding one ya 1 . Framing an equa-
tion with them, the number is found by the former process n'l 7 ru 4, with
the additive.' It comes out 11.*
' See §206.
Putya 1. Its square, less thirty, divided by seven, yields no remainder (§202). Let the
quotient be ca. This* multiplied by seven {ca 7) is equal to that (j/a r 1 ru 30). (Statement for
equal subtraction 3/a V 1 ca ru 30). After subtraction there remains j/aip 1 Root of the first
yavO ca 7 ruO ca 7 ru 30
side is ya 1 . In the other side, by rule § 204, grading the absolute 30 by the divisor, the residue
is 2 ; to which add a multiple of the divisor (§ 204), viz. twice the divisor, the sum is l6 ; and its
square-root, 4. — Su'r. and Ram. The square of this added to seven nf (n» 7 ru 4) is «/ r 49 ni56
ru l6 ; equal to ca 7 ru 30. Whence the value of ca is deduced ni v7 ni S ru 2. — Ram. The
assumed quantity ni7 ru 4 is the root of the second side of equation, and is equal to the. root of
the first 3(al. Whence the value of ya is found nJ 7 ru 4,. Sob. and Ra'm.
'. Putting unity for ni. Ram.
* Both commentaries have ' sqnare of this :' but erroneously.
VARIETIES OF QUADRATICS. 255
If seven «? were put with a negative absolute number, a different result
would be obtained.
206. Example :* Tell me what is the number, the cube of which, less six,
being divided by five, yields no residue ? if thou be sufficiently versed in the
algebra^ of cubes.
Here put the number ya 1 . Doing with it as directed,' the cube-root of
the first side \% ya \; and the other side is c« 5 ru&; from which, by the fore-
going rule (§ 203 — 5) adapted to cubes (choosing a number such that its cube
may be exactly divisible by the divisor, as well as its multiple into thrice the
root of the absolute number;) or by analogy, making it equal to the cube of
five ni with six absolute, and proceeding as before, the number with its addi-
tive is found n'l 5 ru 6.*
207- Example:' If thou be skilled in computation, tell me the number,
the square of which being multiplied by five, having three added, and being
divided by sixteen, is exhausted.
Let the quantity be put ya 1 . Doing with this as said, and multiplying both
sides of equation by five, the square-root of the first side is ya 5. In the
other side ca 80 ru 15, retaining the divisor as enunciated, and taking the
' An instance of the rule (§ 203 — 5) applied to cubes.
» Cuiiaca.
' Put ya 1. Its cube less six, ya gh 1 ru6, being divided by five, is exhausted. Let the quo-
tient be ca. Multiplied by five it* is equal to that. Statement for equal subtraction
ya gh I caO ru6 After subtraction, the root of the first side is ya 1. — Sua. and Ram. In the
ya gh ca 5 ru
other side, ca 5 ru 6, by rule § 204, abrading the absolute number 6 by the divisor 5, the residue
is 1 ; to which add a multiple of the divisor (§ 204): forty-three times the divisor added to 1 is
2l6. Its cube-root is 6. Added to five n.', is «/ 5 ru6. The cube n< gA 125 ni viSO n: 540
ru2l6 is equal to the second side of equation r a 5 ru6. Whence the value of ca is found without
fraction ni gh 25 ni v 90 nj 108 r« 42. — Ram. The assumed quantity ni 5 rw 6 is cube-root
of the second side of equation ca 5 ru6; and equal to the rootof the first side, orj/a 1. The value
of ya is hence deduced niS ru 6. — Su'r. and Ra'-vt.
* By substitution of 1 for n/, the number comes out 11. — Su'r. Putting nought, it is 6; orsup-
posing two, it is l6.
' An instance of the rule § 205. Su'r.
* Both the commentaries here aUo eshibit " cube of this." Whether by error of tlie authors or transcril>ers may be
doubted.
M M
266 Vl'JA-GAN'ITA. Chapter VII.
absolute number as it is adjusted by subtraction (§ 205), the result is cc 16
ru 15. Making an equation of this with eight ni and unity, the value ofca
is obtained without fraction, ni v 4 ni 1 rw 1.' Equating the assumed root
ni 8 ru I with the root of the first side ya 5, the value of i/a is found by
means of the pulverizer, pi 8 ru 5. If the root were supposed eight ni with
negative unity, the result would be pi 8 ru 3.'
' It is five times too great. The augmented divisor 80 should be used to find the true value of
the quotient ca.
• Put yai. Its square, multiplied by five and having three added, is yav 5 ru 3 ; and is exactly
divisible by sixteen. Be the product ca. Multiplied by sixteen, it* is equal to that. After equal
subtractioHi the remainder of equation is ^ i> 5 Multiplying both sides by five, (yo» 25 \
ca l6 >-m3 ca 80 ru 15 J
the root of the first side is 3^(j 5. Of the other side (en 80 r« 15) putting the enunciated divisor
sixteen for the [coefficient of] colour by rule § 205, or making the absolute number, as it is altered
by subtraction and other operations, the correct absolute (§ 205); the statement is ca l6 ru 15.
Put it equal to the square ofeight«{ with unity (n/S ru l)t the statement is cd ««r64 ni 16 r« 1
CO l6 nlvO ni ru 15
Having made the subtraction, the remainder of equation is »t c 64 ni l6 rul6; and divided by
CO 16
the divisor (16) niv 4, ni 1 ru 1. Su'ft. and Ram.
The assumed root ni 8 ru 1 is equal to the root of the first side i/a5. Statement for equal sub-
traction ya ni B ru 1, After subtraction, the remainder of equation is n; 8 rul. Proceeding
ya 5 niO ruO ya 5
by the rule (§ 101) there results Dividend /ij 8 Additive rul. Then, by the rule (§ 55), there
Divisor 3/a 5
arises an uneven series -h rn -< -- o . Multiplying by penult and so on (§ 55) the pair of numbers
deduced is w <n . The series being uneven, the quotient and multiplier are subtracted from their
abraders (§ 57), viz. 8 and 5. Whence the quotient and multiplier with their additives are ob-
tained pi 8 ru 5. The quotient is the value oi ya the colour of the divisor (5 151), and the multi-
pi 5 ru 3
plier is the value of m the colour of the dividend. Statement in their order, pi 8 ru 5 value oiya.
pi 5 fuZ of ni
Or let the assumption be eight ni with unity negative. Statement of the two sides of equation
ya n«8 ru 1 ; and after subtraction ;;/ 8 ru 1 ; whence Dividend ni 8 Additive ]. Then by
ya 5 «* 8 ru ya 5 Divisor ya 5
* T)ie«ame error again occurs in both commentaries, which here pot the " square." It occaaionallj reappears in alt
three instances in course of the operations which follow : still however leaving it doubtful whether it be not imputable to
transcribers.
t The root ni 8 ru 1 is rightly assumed conformably wilh the rule § 205. For 15, abraded by the original divisor 16,
gives a residue 15, to which adding a multiple of divisor bv one, the sum (the signs being contrary) is 1 ; and its square-
root 1 is to be used as root of ihc absolute. Tlie coefficient 8 of the new symbol ni is duly selected such that its square
and its ninltipla by twice that root of the absolute, shall both be divisible by 16. But the square of this assumed root is
not equal to ca 16 ru 15, but to ca 80 ru 15 and to xja v SS.
VARIETIES OF QUADRATICS. 267
The scope of the precept ' many different ways are to be devised' (§ 173)
has been thus exhibited in a multiplicity of instances. Something too has
been shown concerning the solution of quadratics by the pulverizer. Other
devices, as practicable, are to be applied by intelligent algebraists.
the rule (§ 55) is deduced the uneven series ^ _. -, -h o , and from this the pair of numbers <n e« .
The series being uneven, but the additive being negative (§ 59), they are quotient and multiplier :
pis rwS value of j^a. Substituting with pi 8 ru 5 for value of j/a 1 (putting unity for ^i) it is
pi 5 ru2 of ni
13; or substituting with pi 8 ru3 it is 11. Ram.
M M 2
CHAPTER VIII
EQUATION INVOLVING A FACTUM OF UNKNOWN
QUANTITIES.
Next, the product of unknown' is propounded.
208. Rule : two half stanzas.*^ Reserving one colour selected, let values
chosen at pleasure be put for the rest by the intelligent algebraist. So will
the factum be resolved. The required solution may be then completed by
the first method of analysis.'
In an instance where a factum arises from the multiplication of two or
more colours together, reserving one colour at choice, put arbitrary numeral
values for the rest, whether there be one, two, or more. Substituting with
those assumed values for the colours as contained in the sides of equation,
and adding them to absolute immber, and having thus broken the factum,
find the value of the [reserved] colour by the first method of analytic solution.
209. Example: Tell me, if thou know, two numbers such, that the sum
of them, multiplied severally by four and by three, may, when added to two,
be equal to the product of the same numbers.
Let the numbers he it/a \ cal. Dealing with them as expressed, the two
sides of equation are 1/04- ca 3 ru 2. Thus a factum being raised, let an
1/a. ca bh 1
' Bhdiila. See § 21 and comment upon § 100.
^ Compleiinga stanza begun in a preceding rule (§ 201) and beginning auotbur whicb is com-
pleted in the following (§ 212).
' By that taught under the head of simple or uniliteral equation. Ch. 4.
EQUATION INVOLVING A FACTUM. 26y
arbitrary value be put for ca, under the rule (§ 208): as, for instance, five.
Substituting with it for ca in the first side of equation, and adding the term
to the absolute number, it becomes ya 4 ru \7 ; and the other side becomes
ya 5: whence by like subtraction, as before, the value of ya is obtained 17.
Thus the two numbers are 17 and 5. Or substituting six for ca, the two
numbers come out 10 and 6. In like manner, by means of various supposi-
tions, an infinity of answers may be obtained.
210. Example: What four numbers are such, that the product of them
all is equal to twenty times their sum ? say, learned algebraist, who art con-
versant with the topic of product of unknown quantities.
Here let the first number hei/a I ; and the rest be arbitrarily put 5, 4 and 'J.
Their sum is j/a 1 rw II. Multiplied by twenty, ^/a 20 ?•« 220. Product
of all the quantities ya 40. Statement for equation ya 40 ?-m Hence by
ya 20 ru 220
the first analysis, the value of ya is found 1 1 ; and the numbers are 11, 5, 4
and 2. Or [with a different supposition] they are 55, 6, 4 and 1 ; or 60, 8, 3
and 1 ; or 28, 10, 2 and 1, In like manner a multiplicity may be found.
211. Example: Say what is the pair of numbers, of which the sum, the
product and both squares being added together, the square-root of the aggre-
gate, together with the pair of numbers, may amount to twenty-three? or else
to fifty-three? Tell them severally; and in whole numbers. If thou know
this, thou hast not thy e(jual upon earth for a good mathematician.
In this case, let the numbers be \mt ya 1 ru 2. The aggregate of their
product, sum and squares, is yav 1 ya3 ru6. It is equal to the square of
twenty-three less the sum of the numbers (j/a 1 rw 21), viz. ya v I yaik
rw 441. From this equation the value of ^« is obtained V 5 and thus the two
numbers are V ^^^'^ ^'
Or else let the numbers be supposed ya I, ru 3. Proceeding as before,
the two numbers are thence found j-{ and 3. In like manner putting five
for the assumed quantity: the two come out in whole numbers 7 and 5.
In the second example, put the quantities ya 1 ru 2. The aggregate of
their product, sum and squares hya v I ya 3 ru6. It is equal to the square
of fifty-three, less the sum of the numbers (ya 1 ru 51) viz. yav I ya KJa
7'm2601. From the equation of these, by the foregoing process, the two
numbers are ^^ and |. Or integers they are 1 1 and 1 7.
f70 VI'JA-GAN'ITA. Chapter VIII.
Thus, one quantity being put an absolute number, the other is brought
out au integer witii much trouble. How it may be clone with little labour,
is next shown.
212 — 214. Rule: two and a half stanzas. Removing the factum from one
side, and the simple colours and absolute number from the other, as optionally
selected, and dividing both sides of the equation by the coefficient of the
factum, divide the sum of the product of the coefficients of the colours added
to the absolute number by any assumed number; the quotient and the num-
ber assumed must be added to the coefficients of the colours, at choice; or
be subtracted from them: the sums, or the differences, will be the values of
the colours: and they must be understood to be so reciprocally.'
Removing by subtraction the factum from one of the equal sides, and the
simple colours and absolute number from the other, and then reducing the
two sides to the lowest denomination, by the coefficient of the factum as
common measure, and dividing by some arbitrarily assumed number the pro-
duct of the coefficients of the colours on the second side added to the abso-
lute number, the assumed quantity and the quotient, having the coefficients
of the two colours added to them respectively, as selected at pleasure, are
values of the colours ; and to Ik; so understood reciprocally : that is, the one,
to which the coefficient of ca is annexed, is the value of j/a ; and that, to
which the coefficient ofj/a is added, is the value of ca. But, if, owing to the
magnitude, the condition be not answered, when that has been done, the
coefficients, less the quotient and assumed number, are the values recipro-
cally.
First Example : " Tell two numbers such, that the sum of them, multi-
plied by four and three, may, added to tw o, be equal to the product" (§ 209).
Here, that which is directed, being done, the two sides of equation are
^a4 ca3 ru 2." The sum of the product of the coefficients with absolute
ya. cabhl
number is 14. This, divided by one put as the assumed number, gives 1 and
14 for assumed number and quotient. These, with the two coefficients re-
' See BttAHMECUPTA 18, §36; which appears from a subsequent passage (ibid. § 38) and the
scholiast's remark on il, to be a rule borrowed from a still earlier writer.
* The subtraction (or transposition) and division by the coefficient (which, in the instance, is
unity,) leaves the equation unaltered. • Sua.
EQUATION INVOLVING A FACTUM. 271
spcctively added, taking them at choice, furnish tlie vakies of ya and ca,
cither 4 and 1 8, or 17 and 5. By the supposition of two, they come out 5 and
11; or 10 and 6.
The demonstration follows. It is twofold in every case: one geometrical,
the other algebraic' The geometric demonstration is here delivered. The
second side of the equation is equal to the factum of the quantities. But that
factum is the area of an oblong quadrangular figure.* The two colours are
its side and upright. cat Within that plain figure is contained four times
ya with thrice ca and twice unity. Within this figure, then, four times j/a
being taken away, as also ca less four, multiplied by its own coefficient, it
becomes * And the second side of the equation being so treated,
ya
ca
there results ru 14. This is the area of the remaining rectangle at the cor-
ner, within the rectangle representing the factum of the quantities. It is a
product arising from the multiplication of a side and upright. But they are
here unknown. Therefore an assumed number is put for the side; and if
the area be divided by that, the quotient is the upright. Either of the two
(side, or upright,) with the addition of a number equal to the coefficient of
■ya, is the upright of the rectangle representing the factum; because that up-
right was lessened by it when four times ^« was taken from the rectangle
representing the factum. In like manner, the other, Avith the addition of a
number equal to the coefficient o? ca, is the side. These precisely are values
oi ya and ca.
The algebraic demonstration is next set forth. That also is grounded on
figure. Let other colours, ni 1 and pi 1, be put for the length of the side
and upright in the smaller rectangle within the larger one, which consists
of a side and upright represented by ya and ca. Then either of them, added
to a number equal to the coefficient oi ya, is the value o? ya the side of that
rectangle : viz. nil rwi and pi 1 ru 3. Substituting with these for ca and
ya in both sides of the equation, the upper side of it becomes pi 4 ni 3 ru 26 ;
Cshefra-gata, geomeiuc : R(f«-g:a<(J, algebraic or arithmetical. ('far«'a-^a/(f, algebraic exclii-
kively.)
* Ai/ata-chaturasra. See Ltl. Ch. 6.
272
Vl'JA-G ANITA.
Chapter VIII.
and that containing tlic factum is transformed into tii. pi bh 1 in 3 pi A ru 12.
Like subtraction being made, the lower side of equation is ni.pibh 1 ; and
the upper side is ru 14. It is the area of that inner rectangle; and it is
equal to the product of the coefficient added to the absolute number.* How
values of the colours are thence deduced, has heen already shown.
This very operation has been delivered, in a compendious form, by ancient
teachers. The algebraic demonstration must be exliibited to those who do
not comprehend the geometric one.
' Mathematicians have declared algebra to be computation joined with de-
monstration : else there would be no difference between arithmetic and
algebra.'
Therefore this explanation of the principle of the resolution has been
shown in two several ways.
It has been said above, that the product of the coefficient, added to the
absolute number, is the area of another small rectangle within that which
represents the factum of the unknown, and situated at its corner. Some-
times, however, it is otherwise. When the coefficients are negative, the
rectangle representing the factum will be within the other at its corner.
When the coefficients are greater than the side and upright of the rectangle
representing the factum, and are affirmative, the new rectangle will stand
without that which represents the factum, and at its corner. See
3 CO 40
ya
5
When it is so, the coefficients, lessened by subtraction of the assumed num-
ber and quotient, are values of ya and ca.
215. Example: What two numbers are there, twice the product of
which is equal to fifty-eight less than the sum of their multiples by ten and
fourteen?
Let the two numbers be put ya\, ca\. What is directed being done
♦ 4x3 + 2 = 14.
EQUATION INVOLVING A FACTUM. 273
with them, and the equation being divided by the coefficient of the factum,
the result is ya5 ca7 ru 29 The sum of tlie product of coefficients with
ya. ca bh 1
the absolute number, viz. 6* is divided by two ; and the assumed number
and quotient are 2 and 3. The coefficients with these added are either 10
and 7, or 9 and 8 ; and, with the same subtracted, are 4 and 3, or 5 and 2:
the numbers required.
216. Example: What two numbers are there, the product of which,
added to triple and quintuple the numbers themselves, amounts to sixty-
two? Tell them, if thou know.
Here also, what is expressed being done, there results yaS ca5 ru 62
ya. ca bha 1
The sum of the product of coefficients with absolute number is 77- 1 The
assumed number and quotient, 7 and 11. The coefficients, with these
added, make the numbers 6 and 4, or 2 and 8. They should be added only,
as the numbers come out negative, if they be subtracted.'
The foregoing third and fourth examples : " What is the pair of numbers,
&c."C§211.)
Put the two numbers ya\, ca 1. The aggregate of their product, sum
and squares, is ^a i; 1 cav \ ya. ca bh 1 ya \ ca \. Since this does not
affiard a square-root, equal it with the square of twenty-three less the two
quantities {ya\ ca\ ru^S) \\z.yav\ cav\ ya.cabh2 ya4:6 ca46 ru59,9.
Dropping the equal squares, and subtraction being made, the remaining
equation divided by the coefficient of the factum of the unknown (viz.
unity*) gives ya 47 ca 47 ru .529. The product of the coefficients added to
the absolute number is 1680 ;' and this, being divided by forty as assumed
number, gives quotient and arbitrary number 42 and 40. Here the quotient
and arbitrary assumed number must only be subtracted from the coefficients;
♦ (5x7)— 29=6.
+ (— 3x— 5)+62=77.
' The coefficients, with the arbitrar}' assumed number and quotient subtracted, make 12 and 1*,
«r 16 and 20. Ram.
♦ The equal squares being dropped, the statement for subtraction is ya. CO 6A 1 ya 1 ca 1
ya, ca bh 2 ya 46 ca 4o ru 5^8
After subtraction ya 47 ca 47 ru 529
ya. ca bh 1 Ram.
» 2209-529.
V N
874 VI'JA-GAN'ITA. Chapter VIII.
and the numbers will thus come out 7 and 5. If they were added, the con-
dition, that they shall amount to twenty-three (§211), would not be ful-
filled.'
" Or else amount to fifty -three" (§ 211). In this example, that which has
been directed being done, there arises ya\07 ca\07 rw 2809. Here the
sum of the product of coefficients with the absolute number is 8640. The
arbitrary number and quotient 90 and 9^. The coefficients less these quan-
tities are the numbers required, 1 1 and 17.
So, likewise, in other instances.
In some cases, where the equations are numerous, finding various values
of the factum of unknown quantities, and with those values equated and
reduced to a common denomination, the two quantities may be discovered
from the equation, by the former process of analytic solution.
From the mention of quantities in the dual number, it is evident of course,
that arbitrary values are to be put for the rest of the colours, in the cases of
three or more.
• By addition, the numbers are 87 and 89. The square-root of the aggregate (23402) is 155.
The pair of numbers added together, 176. If the root be taken negative, the amount is 23. Sua.
CHAPTER IX.
¥
CONCLUSION.
&\7. On earth was one named Mahe's'wara, who followed the eminent
path of a holy teacher among the learned. His son, Bhascaua, having
from him derived the bud of knowledge, has composed this brief treatise of
elemental computation/
£18. As the treatises of algebra by Brahmegupta," Siiid'haua and
Padmanabha are too diffusive, he has compressed the substance of them in
a well reasoned compendium, for the gratification of learners.
219 — 223. For the volume contains a thousand lines' including precept
and example. Sometimes exemplified to explain the sense and bearing of a
rule ; sometimes to illustrate its scope and adaptation : one while to show
variety of inferences ; another while to manifest the principle. For there
' Laghu Vija-gariita.
* The text expresses Brahmihwaya-vija, algebra named from Brahma ; alluding to the name of
Brahmegupta, or to the title of his work Brahmesidd'hinta, of which the 18th chapter treats of
algebra. The commentator accordingly premises ' Since there are treatises on algebra by Bra h-
MEGUPTA and the rest, what occasion is there for this f The author replies " As the treatises,
&c." Ram.
' Anushtubh. Lines of thirty-two syllables, like the metre termed anushtubh. This intimation of
the size of the volume regards both the prose and metrical part. The number of stanzas including
rules and examples is 210; or, with the peroration, 219- Some of the rules, being divided by in-
tervening examples in a different metre, have in the translation separate numbers affixed to the
divisions. On the other hand a few maxims, and some quotations in verse, have been left un-
Bumbered.
N n2
876 VI'JA-GAN'ITA. Chapter IX.
is no end of instances : and therefore a few only are exhibited. Since the
wide ocean of science is difficultly traversed by men of little understanding:
and, on the other hand, the intelligent have no occasion for copious instruc-
tion. A particle of tuition conveys science to a comprehensive mind ; and
having reached it, expands of its own impulse. As oil poured upon water,
as a secret entrusted to the vile, as alms bestowed upon the worthy, how-
ever little, so does science infused into a wise mind spread by intrinsic
force.
It is apparent to men of clear understanding, that the rule of three terms
constitutes arithmetic ; and sagacity, algebra. Accordingly I have said in
the chapter on Spherics :'
224. ' The rule of three terras is arithmetic ; spotless understanding is
algebra.* What is there unknown to the intelligent ? Therefore, for the
dull alone, it' is set forth.'
225. To augment wisdom and strengthen confidence, read, do read, ma-
thematician, this abridgment elegant in stile, easily understood by youth,
comprising the whole essence of computation, and containing the demon-
stration of its principles, replete with excellence and void of defect.
' GolM'hy&ya. Sect. II. § 3.
^ V'ija.
' The solution of certain problems set forth in the section* The preceding stanza, a part o£
which is cited by the scholiast of the Lildvati, (Ch. 12), premises, ' I deliver for the instruction of
youth a few answers of problems found by arithmetic, algebra, the pulverizer, the affected square,
the sphere, and [astronomical] instruments.' G61, Sect. II. §2.
GANITAD HYA YA, ON ARITHMETIC;
THE TWELFTH CHAPTER OF THE
BRAHME-SPHUTA-SIDD'HANTA,
BY BRAHMEGUPTA;
WITH SELECTIONS FROM THE COMMENTARY ENTITLED
VASA NA-BHASHYA,
BY CHATURVEDA-PRIT'HUDACA-SWAMI.
CHAPTER XII.
ARITHMETIC.
SECTION I.
1. He, who distinctly and severally knows addition and the rest of the
twenty logistics, and the eight determinations including measurement by
shadow,' is a mathematician. -
2. Quantities, as well numerators as denominators, being multiplied by
. ' Addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, square, square-root, cube, cube-root, five
[should be, sIn] rules of reduction of fractions, rule of three terms [direct and inverse,] of five
terras, seven terms, nine terms, eleven terms, and barter, are twenty (paricarmanj arithmetical
operations. Mixture, progression, plane figure, excavation, stack, saw, mound, and shadow, are
eight determinations (vyavah&ra) . Ch.
For topics of Algebra, see note on § 66.
* Gadaca, a calculator ; a proficient competent to the study of the sphere. Ch.
278 BRAHMEGUPTA. Chapter XII.
the opposite denominator, are reduced to a common denomination. In
addition, the numerators are to be united.' In subtraction, their difference
is to be taken.'
3. Integers are multiplied by the denominators and have the numerators
added. The product of the numerators, divided by the product of the deno-
minators, is multiplication" of two or of many terms.*
4. Both terms being rendered homogeneous,' the denominator and nu-
• Scanda-se'k-a'cha'rya, who has exhibited addition by a rule for the summation of series of
the arithraeticals, has done so to show the figure of sums ; and he has separately treated of figu-
rate quantity (cshetra-r6si), to show the area of such figure in an oblong. But, in this work,
addition being the subject, sum is taught; and the author will teach its figure by a rule for the
summation of series (§ 19)- In this place, however, sum and difference of quantities haying like
denominators are shown: and that is fit. Cti.
* Example of addition :* What is the sum of one and a thirdi one and a half, one and a sixth
part, and the integer three, added together?
Sutement: lA 1^ 1^ 3. Or reduced J f J f .
The numerator and denominator of the first term being multiplied by the denominator of the
second, 2, and those of the second by that of the first, 3, they are reduced to the same denominator
(? f ; ^"^> uniting the numerators, y). With the third term no such operation can be, since the
denominator is the same: union of the numerators is alone to be made; ^, which abridged is) 4.
So with the fourth term: and the addition being completed, the sum is 7.
Subtraction is to be performed in a similar manner; and the converse of the same example may
serve. Ch.
' Pra<3^ui'j)an«a, product of two proposed quantities.— Ch. See a rule of long multiplication,
§55.
♦ Example : Say quickly what is the area of an oblong, in which the side is ten and a half, and
the upright seventy sixths.
Statement: 10| 11|. Multiplying the integers by the denominators, adding the numerators,
and abridging, the two quantities become ^ and ^. From the product of the numerators 735,
divided by the product of the denominators 6, the quotient obtained is 122 i. It is the area of
the oblong.
Others here exhibit an example of the rule of three terras, making unity stand for the argument
or first terra. For instance, if one pah of pepper be bought for six and a half paiias, what is the
price of twenty-six pato? Answer: i6d paiias.] Cii.
' The method of rendering homogeneous has been delivered in the foregoing rule (| 3) " Integers
are multiplied by the denominators," &c. — Ch, It is reduction to the form of an improper
fraction.
• It is not quite clear wlietlier the examples are the autlior's or the commentator's. The metre of them is different from
that of the rules; and they are not comprehended, either in this or in the chapter on Algebra, in the summed contents at
tlie close of each. They are probably the commentator's ; and consigned therefore to the notes.
Section I. LOGISTICS: FRACTIONS. 279
merator of the divisor are transposed : and then the denominator of the di-
vidend is multiplied by the [new] denominator; and its numerator, by the
[new] numerator. Thus division' [is performed.]
5. The quantity being made homogeneous,* the square of the nume-
rator, divided by the square of the denominator, is the square.' The root
of the homogeneous numerator, divided by the root of the denominator, is
the square-root.*
6. The cube of the last term is to be set down; and, at the first remove
from it, thrice the square of the last multiplied by the preceding; tlien
thrice the square of this preceding term taken into that last one; and finally
the cube of the preceding term. The sum is the cube.'
' Example : In a rectangle, the area of which is given, a hundred and twenty-two and a half;
and the side, ten and a half; tell the upright.
Statement: 122^ 10^. Reduced to homogeneous form 2|5 ^,
Here the side is divisor. Its denominator and numerator are transposed ^. The numerator of
the dividend, multiplied by this numerator, becomes 490 ; and the denominator of the dividend,
taken into the denominator, makes 42. The one, divided by the other, gives the quotient 11 j.
It is the upright.
Some in this place also introduce an example of the rule of three terms. Thus " A king gave
to ten principal priests a hundred thousand pieces of money, together with a third of one piece.
What was the wealth that accrued to one?" Ch.
* As before. — Ch. [That is, reduced to fractional form.]
Put unity as the denominator of an integer ; and proceed as directed. Ch.
' A square is the product of two like quantities multiplied together. § 62. The present rule is
introduced to show how the square of a fraction is found. Ch.
Example : Tell the area of an equilateral tetragon, the side and upright of which are alike
seven halves.
Statement: Side J Upright -1. Product of the numerators 49. Product of the denomina-
tors 4. These products are squares, since the side and upright are equal.
The square of the numerator 49 being divided by the square of the denominator 4, the quotient
12 ^ is the area of the tetragon. lli.
* Example : Tell the equal side and upriglit of an equilateral tetragon, the area of which is
determined to be twelve and a quarter.
Statement, after rendering homogeneous : *^. The root of the homogeneous numerator 49, is
7 : that of the denominator 4, is 2. Dividing by this the root of the numerator, the quotient is
the square-root |. It is the length of the upright and of the side. Ch.
' Continued multiplication of three like quantities is a cube. § 62. As 1, 8, 27, 64, 125, 2l6,
343, 512, 729, cubes of numbers from 1 to 9. The rule is introduced for finding the cube of ten
380 BRAH ME GUPTA. Chapter XII.
7. The divisor for the second non-cubic [digit] is thrice the square of the
cubic-root. The square of the quotient, niultiphed by three and by the pre-
ceding, must be subtracted from the next [non-cubic]; and the cube from
the cubic [digit]: the root [is found].'
and so forth. The cube of any given quantity comprisingiwo or more digits or terms is required.
The cube of the last digit, found by continued multiplication, is to be set down. Then the square
of that last digit, tripled and multiplied by the term next before the last, is to be set down, at one
remove or place of figures from that of the cube previously noted ; and to be added to it. [So the
square of this term tripled and taken into the last digit.] Then the cube of the term so preceding
is set down in the next place of figures; and added. Thus the cube of two terms or digits is found.
For a number comprising three or more terms, put two of them [previously finding the cube of this
binomial by the rule] for last term ; and proceed in every other respect conformably with the di-
rections; and then, in like manner, put the trinomial* for last term ; and so on, to find the cube of
a quantity containing any number of terms. Ch.
Example : Tell the cubic content of a quadrangular equilateral well (or cistern) measured by
three cubits cubed and the same in depth.
Statement: 27, 27, 27. The product of these three equal quantities is 19683. It is the con-
tent in cubits of a solid having twelve corners :t for " the multiplication of three like quantities is
a twelve-angled solid."
The rule furnishes another method. The cube of twenty-seven is required. The cube of the
last digit 2 is set down 8. The square of the last 8, tripled, is 12, and multiplied by the preceding
is 84: set down at the first remove, and added to the cube previously noted, it makes l64, [Thrice
the square of 7 multiplied by 2 is 2f)4; put at the next place of digits and added, makes 1934.]
Cube of the preceding digit 7 is 343. Added as before, it gives 19683. It is the solid content in
cubits ; that is, it contains so many twelve-angled excavations measured by a cubit.
The same is to be understood of a pile or stack ; putting height instead of depth. Ca.
' The first digit of the proposed cube is termed cubic ; and proceeding inversely, the two next
places of figures are denominated non-cubic; then one cubic, and two non-cubic; and so on alter-
nately, until the end of the number. With this preparation, the rule takes effect The
meaning is as follows : In the first place, the cube of some number is to be subtracted from the
lastof all the digits termed cubic; and that number is reserved, and set down apart with the designa-
tion of cube-root. Take its square and multiply this by three ; and with the tripled square
divide the digit standing next before that of which the cube-root was taken ; and note the quotient
ill the second place contiguous in direct order to the reserved cube-root. Square the quotient,
and multiply by three and by the cube-root first found ; and subtract the product from the first
non-cubic standing before that of which the division was made. Then taking the cube of the
quotient subtract it from the next preceding cubic digit. Thus a binomial root is found. If more
be requisite, put the binomial root for first term ; and proceed in every respect according to the
rule, using it as first cube-root: and then put the trinomial, and afterwards the tetranomial, for
first radical term ; until the proposed number be exhausted.
* Vwipada, binomial; tripada, U'luomialj chatushpadaiteUanomitiU
t Duddiudiri, lit. dodecagon ; but iiilendiiig a rube or a parallelopipedon. See LiUttati, i 7.
c
Suction I. LOGISTICS: FRACTIONS. 281
8. The sum of numerators which have like denominators, being divided
by the [common] denominator, is the result in the first reduction to homo-
geneousness :' in the second, multiply numerators by numerators, ^nd deno-
minators by denominators.''
Example : Tell the cubic-root of a stack, of which the flanks* and elevation are alike, and the
solid content is equal to twelve thousand, one hundred and sixty-seven.
Statement: 121 67. Here the digit 7 is named cubic ; 6 and 1 non-cubic; 2 cubic. From that
subtract the cube of two, the remainder is 4l67. Cube-root 2; its square 4; tripled 12; this is
the divisor. Dividing by that the second non-cubic digit, the quotietit is 3 and remainder 567.
The square of the quotient 9 ; multiplied by three, 27, and by the preceding, 54. Subtracted
from the first non-cubic, the residue is 27- Cube of the quotient, 27, subtracted from the cubic
place of figures, leaves no remainder. Thus the root is this binomial 23. So much is the height;
as much the length ; and as much the breadth of the pile.
For trinomials and the rest, proceed as directed.
Such is the method of finding the cube and cube-root of integers. For the cube of fractions, let
the cube of the numerator, after the quantity has been rendered homogeneous [§3], and the cube
of the denominator, be separately computed : and divide the one by the other, the quotient is the
cube sought. For the cube-root, let the roots be separately extracted, and then divide the cube-
root of the numerator by that of the denominator, the quotient is the cube-root of the fraction. Ch.
' The author here teaches the method of finding the result of the first assimilation Cjdti) con-
sisting in addition. The sum of numerators which have dissimilar denominators is never taken.
All the quantities must be reduced to like denominators : and then the addition of numerators is
made ; and the sum is divided by a single common denominator.
Example : Half of unity, a sixth part of the same, a twelfth part of it, and a quarter, being added
together, what is the amount ?
Statement : i ^ tV -J. Reduced to like denominators the numerators become -^ ^V t^i A-
Added together and divided by the numerator, the result is unity.
Example: Twenty-two, sixty-six, thirty-eight, thirty-nine, thirteen, a hundred and fourteen are
put in the denominator's place, and five, seven, nine, one, four and eleven are their numerators.
When they are added together what is the whole sum?
Statement : ^2 jV ^s A "A t¥i- Answer : one.
But when the similar denomination is not obvious, the denominators being very large, divide both
denominators by the remainder [or last result] of the reciprocal division of the two, and multiply
by the two quotients the reversed denominators together with their quotients. Other methods
may be similarly devised by one's own ingenuity.
Subtraction also takes place between like quantities : and the rule must be therefore applied to
difference. Cii.
* The author now teaches the method of finding the result of the second assimilation consisting
in multiplication.
First multiply separately numerators by numerators, and denominators by denominators. Then
proceed with the former part of the rule.
• ririwa, flank or side.
00
Hi BRAHMEGUPTA. Chapter XII.
9, In the third, the upper numerator is multiplied by the denominator.'
In the two next, severally, the denominators are multiplied by the denomi-
nators ; jjnd the upper numerators by the same increased or diminished by
their own numerators.*
Example : Half a quarter, a sixtli part of a quarter, a twelfth part of a quarter, an eighth part
of ten quarters, a fifth part of seven quarters : summing these and adding three twentieths, let us
quickly declare the amount. It is a sura, which we must constantly pay to a learned astronomer.
Statement: H H i^ i£ ^ H ^:
O""' i A A U -h -in- Answer: the sum is one.
• The author next shows the method of finding the result of the third assimilation consisting in
division.
The dividend is intended by the term upper numerator : and the middle quantity together with
it( denominator is the divisor. Then the rule for transposition of numerator and denominator (§ 4)
takes effect.
Example : In what time will [four] fountains, being let loose together, fill a cistern, which they
would severally fill in a day; in half a one; in a quarter; and in a fifth part?*
Statement: 1111 The rule being observed; i t J 4. The sum is 12.
1 i i i
So many are the measures in a day with all the fountains. Then by the rule of three, if so many
fillings take place in one day, in what time will one? Statement: *f 1 -J- | -J. Answer:-^. In this
portion of a day, all the fountains, loose together, fill the cistern.
Example : One bestows an unit on holy men, in the third part of a day ; another gives the same
alms in half a day ; and a third distributes three in five days. In what time, persevering in those
rates, will they have given a hundred ?
Statement: 113 And, the rule being observed, ^ f f. Reducing these to a com-
4 i i
mon denominator, and summing them, the result is ^; the total amount, which all bestow in alms
in a day. Then by the rule of three, if so many fifths of an unit be given in one day, in how
many will a hundred units be given ?
Statement: '^ | i | i^. Answer: 17 4. Cii.
* The author adds this rule to exhibit reduction of fractional increase and decrease (hhagdnu-
band'ha and bhdgapavdha-jdtij ; the two assimilations Qa''-^ which follow next after the first, se-
cond and third; that is, the fourth and fifth.
■ In fractional increase the numerators standing above are multiplied by the denominators aug-
mented by their own numerators ; in fractional decrease by the same diminished by their own
numerators. The remainder of the process consists in reduction to homogeneous form as before.
Example of fractional increase: A little boy, receiving from a merchant a quarter of an unit,
dealt with commodities for gain, during six days, and obtained for his goods, on the respective days,
u price with both profit and principal equal to the original money added to its half, its third, its
quarter, its fifth part, its sixth, and its seventh: what was the amount? Another did the same with
• LOdvatl, § 94—95.
Section I. RULE OF PROPORTION. 283
10. In the rule of three, argument, fruit and requisition [are names of
the terms] : the first and last terms must be similar.^ Requisition, multipHed
by the fruit, and divided by the argument, is the produce."
an unit: and a third did so, with six. Tell the amount of their dealings also, if thou be conversant
with fractional increase.
Statement :
i
f
h
h
h
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
\
\
i
!•
The denominator four, multiplied by the denominator two, makes 8. The upper numerator 1,
multiplied by the denominator 2 added to its own numerator 1, viz. 3, gives 3; and the result is |.
Proceeding in like manner with three and the rest of the denominators, the amount for the first boy
is 1 ; for the second, 4; for the third, S-l.
Example of fractional decrease : Eight palas of white sandal wood were carried by a merchant
from Canyacvbja to the northern mountain ; and at five places offerings were made by him of a
moiety, a third part, a fifth, a ninth, and an eighth part of his stock. What was the residue ?•
Statement: 8 Multiply denominators by denominators ; and the
^ upper numerators by denominators lessened by
•§■ their own numerators. This being done, the
f answer is 1 -^ [should be ^3^].
The author has delivered but five rules of reduction or assimilation (jAti) ; and has omitted the
sixth, as it consists of the rest and is therefore virtually taught. It has been given by Scanda-
se'na and others under the name of Bhuga-m&td. Ch.
See Bhaga-mdtri-jati in Srid'hara's abridgment : § 56 — 57-
' The middle term is dissimilar. Ch.
* TTie rule concerns integers. If there be fractions among the terms, reduce all to the same
denominator. Ch.
Example : A person gives away a hundred and eight cows in three days ; how many kine does
he bestow in a year and a month ?
Statement: Days 3. Cows 108. Days 390.
Answer: 14040.
Example : A white ant advances eight barley corns less one fifth part of that amount in a day ;
and returns the twentieth part of a finger in three days. In what space of time will one, whose
progress is governed by these rates of advancing and receding, proceed one hundred yojanas ?
Statement : Daily advance 8 less ^. Triduan retrogradation -^^ fiiig. Distance 100 y.
• The text of tliis example, its statement and the answer are very corrupt.
o o 2
3B4 BRAHMEGUPTA. Chapter XII.
II. In the inverse rule of three terms, the product of argument and fruit,
being divided by the demand, is the answer.'
II — 12. In tlie case of three or more* uneven terms, up to eleven,' transi-
tion of the fruit takes place on both sides.
The product of the numerous terms on one side, divided by that of the
fewer on the other, must be taken as the answer. In all the fractions, transi-
tion of the denominators, in like manner, takes place on both sides.*
Here this maxim applies " eight breadths of a barley corn are one finger ; twenty-four fingers,
one cubit; four cubits, one staff; eight thousand staves, one yojana."
The daily advance, in a homogeneous form, is ^ of a barley-corn. Retrogradation in three
days, -j^ of a finger; in one day, by tlie proportion, ' as three to that, so is one to how much?' ■^.
The daily advance, divided by eight, is reduced to fingers, viz. f J or f . Reduced to the same de-
nominator as the retrogradation, |J. Subtracting the retrogradation, the neat progress is J J. A
hundred yojanas, turned into sixtieths of fingers, are 46O8OOOOOO. Then |J | •}• | . «6»aoooooo |
Answer: Days 98042553. Ch.
* Example : The load (bhira) was before weighed with a tuUi o( six tuvernas, tell me, promptly,
how much will it be, if weighed out with one of five i
Statement: su.6} bhd I ; lu 5.
Answer : 24 hundred palas.
Here this maxim serves " sixteen grains of barley are one mdsha; sixteen of these, a mverna;
four of which, make one pala; and two thousand palas, a bhdra."
Example : Tell me, quickly, how many ten c'hdrU, which were meted with a measure of three
and a half to the jirasfha, will be when meted with one of five and a half?
Statement: ca ^ ; c'h&iO; cu^.
Answer: c'hdS, md 1, drol, d3, pral, cu-^.
Maxim applicable to the instance. " Four cu'dabas make one prast'ha; four of these, one ffd'haca;
four (i'd'Aacas, a hollow purdlana;* four of these, a m<{nic({; four mdnicds, one c'hdri, a measure
familiar to the people of Magad'/ia." Ch.
The case of three terms must be excluded, being already provided for (§ 10); and the rule
concerns five, seven, nine and eleven terms. Cii.
* Uneven ; not even, as four, &c. would be. Cn.
* Example: The interest is settled at ten in the hundred for three months: let the interest of
sixty lent for five months be told.
Statement: 3 5 Answer: 10.
100 60
10
Transferring the term ten to the second side, the product of this becomes the more numerous
one, viz. 3000 ; which, divided by the product of the fewer, three and a hundred, viz. 300, gives
10 ; the interest for five months.
Example: If the interest of thirty and a half, for a month and one third, be one and a half: be
it here told what is the interest of sixty and a half for a year?
* Chita piiritana. It U tliedriin'a ofSniVBABA and BiiVscAnA. See Lit. $ B, and Can. itfr. $ 5.
Section I. BARTER. fi85
1 3. In the barter of commodities, transposition of prices being first
Statement of homogeneous terms: ^ ^
f
Transposition of the fruit and of the denominators having been made, the statement is 4 12
1 3
6l 121
2 2
2 3
Whence the answer is found as before 26-^.
Example: Forty is the interest of a hundred for ten months. A hundred has been gained in
eight months. Of what sum is it the interest?
Statement: 10 8
100
40 100
Mutually transferring the fruits, forty on one side and a hundred on the other, the statement
is 10 8 Whence proceeding as above, the answer comes out t^,
100 *
100 40
The same answer may be found by two proportions or sets of three terras.
Example of seven terms: If three cloths, five [cubits] long and two wide, cost six paiias, and ten
have been purchased three wide and six long, tell the price.
Statement : 2 3 Transposing, and proceeding as in the rule of five, the answer is 36.'
5 6
3 10
6
Example : If three cloths, two wide and five long, cost six panas; tell me how many cloths,
three wide and six long, should be had for six times six i
Statement: 2 3 Making a mutual transfer, and in other respects preceding as above,
^ " the answer is 10.
3
6 36
The answer may be proved by three proportions or sets of three terms.
Example of nine terms: The price of a hundred bricks, of which the length, thickness and
breadth, respectively, are sixteen, eight and ten, is settled at six dindras: we have received a hun-
dred thousand of other bricks a quarter less in every dimension : say what we ought to pay.
Statement: l6 12 Transposition of fruit and of denominator being made, the answer
* j^ comes out 2531 J.
100 100000
The answer may be proved by four proportions or sets of three terms.
Example of eleven terms: Two elephants, which are ten in length, nine in breadth, thirty-six in
girt, and seven in height, consume one drona of grain. How much will be the rations often other
elephants, which area quarter more in height and other dimensions?
S86 BRAHMEGUPTA. Chapter XII.
terms takes place ; and the rest of the process is the same as above direct-
ed.'
Operations,* subservient to the eight investigations,' have been thus ex-
plained.
Statement: 2 10 The fruit and denominators being transposed, and proceeding as above, the
10 ^ SLiawer comei out 12 droiias, 3 prast' has, 1^ cuJaba.
9 V
36 45
7 V
1
' Example: If a hundred of mangoes be purchased for ten paiias; and of pomegranates for
eight ; how many pomegranates [should be exchanged] for twenty mangoes ?
Statement: 10 81 f 8 10
100 100 >and after transposition of prices and transition of fruit ;< 100 100
20 3 (.20
Answer: 25 pomegranates.
* Paricarman : algorithm, or logistics. See§l.
These operations, us affecting surd roots, unknown quantities, affirmative and negative terms,
and cipher, the author will teach in the chapter on (cuiiaca) the pulverizer ; and we shall there
explain them under the relative rules. Ch.
* Vyttv»h&ra, ascertainment, or determination. § 1 .
( 287 )
SECTION II.
•
MIXTURE.
14. The argument taken into its time and divided by the fruit, being-
multiplied by the factor less one, is the time.* The sum of principal and
interest, being divided by unity added to its fruit, is the principal.*
15. The product of the time and principal, divided by the further time,
is twice set down.^ From the product of the one by the mixt amount,
' The principal sum, multiplied by the time, reckoned in months, which regulates the interest,
is divided by the interest : and the quotient is multiplied by one less than the factor ; (if the double
be inquired, by one; if the triple, by two; if the sesquialteral, by half;) the result i» the number
of months, in which the sum lent is raised to that multiple. Ch.
Example : If the interest of two hundred for a month be six drammas, in what time will the
same sum lent be tripled ?
Answer : 66 f months.
Example : If the interest of twenty paiias for t%vo months be five, say in what time will ray
principal be raised to the sesquialterate amount ?
Answer : 4 months. lb.
■^ Subtracting this from the amount given, the remainder is the interest. Or multiply the
amount of principal and interest by the interest of unity and divide by unity added to its interest,
the quotient is the interest. Ch.
Example : A sum lent at five in the hundred by the month amounted to six times six in ten
months ; what was the sum in this case lent ?
Answer: Principal 24. Interest 12.
Example : Eight hundred suverrias were delivered to a goldsmith with these directions : " make
vessels for the priests, and take five in the hundred for the making." He did as directed. Tell
me the amount of wrought gold.
Answer : Wrought gold 76 1 ^. Fashion 38 ^.
The rule is applicable to analogous instances. lb.
* The rate of interest by the hundred, at which the money was lent by the creditor, is not
known. All that is known is, that the interest for a given number of months has been received
^8 BRAHMEGUPTA. Chapter XII.
added to the square of half the other, extract the square-root : tliat root,
less half the second, is the interest of principal.'
16. The contributions, taken into the profit divided by the sum of the
contributions, are the several gains :* or, if there be subtractive or additive
differences, into the profit increased or diminished by the differences ; and
the product has the corresponding difference subtracted or added.'
and lent out again at the same rate, and has amounted in a given number of months to a certain
sum, principal and interest. The rate of interest is required ; and the rule is propounded to find
it. Ch.
' Example : Five hundred drammas were a loan at a rate .of interest not known. The interest
of that money for four months was lent to another person at the same rate ; and it accumulated in
ten months to seventy-eight. Tell the rate of interest on the principal.
Answer : 60.
Here the demonstration is to be shown algebraically by solution of a quadratic equation, as
follows. If the interest of five hundred for four -months be y^iaca; what is the interest of ^/iraca
for ten months. Here, transition of the fruit taking place (§ 12), the principal taken into the
time is the product of the fewer terms ; and the product of the numerous terms is the square of
y&vaca multiplied by tht further time. Those products are reduced to least terras by a common
divisor equal to the further time : as is directed (§ 15). Thus, by the rule of three terms, the
answer comes our yav -j^; the interest of ydvaca. Adding yixaca, it is the mixed amount; that
is, yav-^^ y'^\- This is equal to seventy-eight. Reducing to uniformity and dropping the
common denominator, the two sides of the equation become : 1st side ya 1 1 ya 200 ru ; 2d
side yavO yaO ruloGO. By the rule in the chapter on cuiiaca, "of the coefficient of the
tquare, &c."* the value oi y&vaca comes out 60; which is equal to that above found. Cn.
* Pracshepaca : what is thrown or cast together : the proposed quantities, of which an union is
made. Ch.
LabcThi, profit. L/ibha, gain. Uttara, difference.
* Example of the first rule : A horse was purchased, with the principal sums, one, &c. up to
nine, by dealers in partnership; and was sold [by them] for five less than five hundred. Tell me
what was each man's share' of the mixt amount.
Statement: Contributions 1, 2, 3, 4, 3, 6, 7, 8, <). Their sum 45. The profit 495, di-
vided by that, gives the quotient 11 ; by which the contributions being multiplied, become 11, 22,
33, 44, 55, 66, 77, 88, S9- Tiiese are the several gains of the dealers.
Example of the second rule : Four colleges, containing an equal number of pupils, were invited
to partake of a sacrificial feast. A fifth, a half, a third, and a quarter came from the respective
colleges to the feast ; and, added to one, two, three and four, they were found to amount to eighty-
seven ; or, with those differences deducted, they were sixty-seven.
• Varg'-ihttitt-rifdnim, &c. See Algebra of BraAm. $ S4.
Section II. MIXTURE. 289
Statement : 1 2 3 4 Reduced to a common denomination and the denominator being
i i i i
dropped, they are 12 3 4 The number given is 87. It is the profit (5 1 6). Deduct-
12 30 20 15
ing the sum of the differences (1, 2, 3, 4) viz. 10, the remainder is 77 : vvhich, divided by the
sum of the contributions, 77, gives 1 ; and the contributions, multiplied by this quotient, and
having their differences added, become 13, 32, 23, ip; or, added together, 87. The number of
disciples in each college is 60. Or, subtracting the differences, the number of pupils that came
from the four colleges to the feast is 1 1, 28, 17, U ; total 67.
Example : Three jars of liquid butter, water, and honey, contained thirty-two, sixty, and
twenty-four palas respectively : the whole was mixed together, and the jars again filled ; but I
know not the several numbers. Tell me the quantity of butter, of water and of honey, in each jar-
Statement: Butter 32; water 60; honey 24: these are the contributions (§ l6). Their sum,
ll6; by which divide the profit, viz. butter 32, the quotient is -^. The contributions, severally
multiplied by this, give the gains, viz. butter in the butter-jar 8 1^ ; in the water-ji'.r, l6 ^ ; in
the honey-jar, 6"^. So water in the water-jar 3 1 jig ; in the honey-jar, 12^; in the butter-
jar, l6^: honey in the hoiiey-jar 4 If ; in the butter-jar, 6|^; in the water-jar, 12^. Ch.
Remark. — In this chapter of arithmetic, the computation of gold [or alligation] is omitted. On
that account, the following stanza is here subjoined. " Add together the products of the weight
into the fineness of the gold ; and divide by the given touch : the quotient is the quantity. Or
divide by the sum of the gold, the quotient is the touch."
Thus five suvernas of the touch of twelve, six of that of thirteen, and seven of that of fourteen,
(5 6 7 or, multiplying weight into fineness, 60, 78, 98 ;) being added together, are 236.
12 13 14
By whatever touch this mass is divided, the quotient is the quantity of gold of that fineness. For
instance, if the touch be sixteen, dividing by l6, the quotient is 14 su. 12 m&. Dividing by
fifteen, it is l6 -^.* The number of suvernat in the mass is of one fineness. The mass of gold,
therefore, is to be divided by the sum of the weights: the quotient is the touch of that number of
tucernat. Thus, dividing the aggregate of products of weight into fineness, 236, by the sum of
the weight! 18, the quotient 13 -} is the touch. Ch.
* So tbe MS. But )hogld be 15 f }.
P T
^}«(J ( 290 )
SECTION III,
PROGRESSION.
17. The period less one, multiplied by the common difference, being
added to the first term, is the amount of the last. Half the sum of last and
first terms is the mean amount: which, multiplied by the period, is the sum
of the whole.*
• To find the contents of a pile in the form of half the meru-yantra [or spindle]. Ch.
Example : A stack of bricks is seen, containing five layers, having two bricks at the top, and
increasing by three in each layer : tell the whole number of bricks.
Statement: Init. 2 ; DiflF. 3 ; Per. 5. Answer: 40.
Example : The king bestowed gold continually on venerable priests, during three days and a
ninth part, giving one and a half \bharas\ with a daily increase of a quarter : what were the mean
and last terms, and the total ?
Statement: Init. 1 J ; DiflF. J ; Per. 3^.
Period ^, less one, is ^ ; multiplied by the difference, it is ^ ; and added to the first terra,
becomes^. This is the last term. Added to the first term and halved, it gives ii^. This is
the mean amount: multiplied by the period, it yields the total -ff^; or 5 bhdras, 9 hun'^i'C*!
[;)a/ai] and -g^ [of a hundred].
Example : Tell the price of the seventh conch ; the first being worth six parias, and the rest
increasing by a pana ?
Statement: Init. 6 ; Diff. 1 ; Per. 7. Answer: 12.
Example: A man gave his son-in-law sixteen pa«(W the first day; and diminished the present
by two a day. If thou be conversant with progression, say how many had he bestowed when the
ninth day was past ?
Statement: Init. 16; Diff. 2; Per. 9- Answer: 72 ; received by the son-in-law : or 72 the
father-in-law's; being his disbursement.
Example : [The first term being five ; the difference three ; and the period eight ; what is the
sum ? the last term ? and the mean amount ?*]
Statement: Init. .S; Diff. 3; Per. 8. Answer: Last term 26. Mean Y- Sura 124.
Here one side is to be put equal to the period of the progression ; and a second, equal to its
* The terms of the question are wanting in the original.
Section III. PROGRESSION. 291
18. Add the square of the difFerence between twice the initial term and
the common increase, to tlie product of the sum of the progression by eight
times the increase : the square-root, less the foregoing remainder divided by
twice the common increase, is the period.'
mean term : and the figure of a rectangle is to be thus exhibited. Then 30 many little areas, in
the figure of the progression, [formed] by its area, as are excluded [on the one part,] are gathered
in front within that oblong. Therefore the finding of the area is congruous. Ch.
To show the rule for finding the sum of a series increasing twofold, or threefold, &c. three
stanzas of my own [the commeutator Prit'hu'daca's] are here inserted : ' At half the given pe-
riod put "square;" and at unity [subtracted] put " multiplier;" and so on, until the period be
exhausted. Then square and multiply the common multiplier inversely in the order of the notes.
Let the product less one be divided by the multiplier less one, and multiplied by the amount of
the initial term ; and call the result area [or sum], the progression being [geometrical] twofold, &c.
This method is here shown from the combination of metre in prosody.' The meaning is this : if
the period be an even number, halve it, and note "square" in another place; when the number
is uneven, subtract unity, and note " multiplier" in that other place and contiguous. Proceed in
the same manner, halving when the number is even, and subtracting one when it is uneven, and
noting the marks " square" and " multiplier," one under the other, in order as they are found
until the period be exhausted. The lowermost mark must of course be " multiplier." It is equal
to the [common] multiplier [of the progression]. Setting down that on the working ground,
square the quantity when " square" is noted, and multiply it where " multiplier" is marked : pro-
ceeding thus in the inverse order, to the uppermost note. From the quantity which is thus ob-
tained, subtract unity; divide the remainder by the amount of the [common] multiplier less one;
and multiply the quotient by the number of the initial term. This being done, the product is the
sum of a progression, where the difference is twofold or the like. 7J.
Example : How mucH is given in ten days, by one who bestows six with a threefold increase
daily ?
Statement: Init. 6; Com. mult. 3; Per. 10. Answer: l??!**.
Example : Say how much is given by one, who bestows for three days, three and a half [daily]
with increase measured by the [common] multiplier five moieties?
Statement : Init. | ; Diff. mult. | ; Per. 3.
Put" mult." for subtraction of unity; " square" for the half; and again "mult." for unity
subtracted : mult. The multiplier is two and a half or ^, at the first place. Squared at the
sq.
mult,
second, it is «^ ; and again multiplied at the third, if*. Unity being subtracted, it is >^'. Di-
vided by multiplier less one (-J) it becomes ^. This multiplied by the initial term, and abridged,
yields 2|3.
' The first term, common increase, and total amount, being known, to find the period. Ch.
Example: Say how many are the layers in a stack containing a hundred bricks, and having
at the summit ten, and increasing by five.
Statement : Init. 10; Cora. diff. 5 ; Per. ? Sum 100. '
pp2
SOS BRAHMEGUPTA. Chapter XII.
19. One, &c. increasing by one, [being added together] are the sum of a
Operation: Twice the initial, 20, less the increase 5, is 15; the square of which is 2?5. The
sum 100, eight (8) and increase 5, multiplied together, make 4000. Add to this the square uf
the remainder, 225, the total is 4225. Its square-root 65, less the foregoing remainder 15, gives
50; which diWdfd by twice the common increase, 10, yields the period 5.
So in other c.ises liiiewise.
Here the principle is the resolution of a quadratic equation. For instance: Init. 10; Com.
diff. 5; Per. yal. This less one [§ 17] becomes i/a I ru I ; which, multiplied by the common
increase 5, makes ^a 5 r«5; and added to the initial term 10, affords ya 5 ru5, the last terra.
Added to first term, it is t/a 5 r« 15 ; which halved gives j/af ru ^. It is the mean amount ; and,
multiplied by the period, yields t/av ^ J'" V> '''^ ''""' °f ^^^ whole : which is equal to a hundred.
Making an equation, two is multiplier of a hundred, being the [denominator, or] divisor standing
beneath,* as before shown. The quantity being so treated, and the rule for preparing the equa-
tiont observed, the first side of the equation is yav 5 yaiS; and the second side is ru 200.
Then, proceeding by the rule " Multiply by four times [the coefficient of] the square" and so
forth,! 'he absolute number becomes 4000. It is the product of the multiplication of the sum,
common increase and eight. For the multiplier being two, the quantity must be multiplied by
that and by four : wherefore multiplication by eight is specified. The unity, which is subtracted
from y&vaca, becomes negative : it is multiplied by the common increase ; and thus a number
equal to the common increase becomes negative : this being added to the initial term, and the
result again added to the initial term, an affirmative quantity equal to twice the initial is intro-
daced : taken together, the difference is the sum of the negative and affirmative quantities and is
fitly called the remainder. It is here tiie coefficient of y&vaca. Then, observing the rule for
adding " the square of [the eoetficient of] the middle term,"|| the absolute number is as here shown :
viz. 4225. Its root, 65, less the [coefficient of the] middle term, is 50 : which, divided by twice
the [coefficient of the] square, is the middle [term of the equation], that is to say the period of
the progression: viz. 5. For ydvaca is here the period.
If the initial term be unknown, but the common increase, period and sum be given, divide the
sum of the progression by the period : the quotient is the mean amount. Double it; and subtract
the product of the period less one taken into the common increase: half the remainder is the initial
term. For instance: Init,? Diff. 3 ; Per. 5; Sum 40. This, divided by the period, gives 8, the
mean amount; which doubled is l6. The period less one is 4; and the common increase 3: their
product 12. Subtracting this from the foregoing, the remainder is 4 : its half 2 is the initial term.
This is to be applied in olher cases also.
Where the common increase is unknown ; divide in like manner the sum by the period, the quo-
tient is the mean amount. Double it ; and subtract twice the initial term : the quotient of the re-
• Aghauehtt-cVhidn.
t Algebra of BiuAm. §33.
X See Algebra of Bfahm. § S3. A rule of (be >aine import with that of SaiD'aABi cited by 'BHttckn.A. Vip-
fan, $ ISl.
B Ibid.
Section III. PROGRESSION. 293
given period. That sum being multiplied by the period added to two, and
being divided by three, is the sum of the sums.'
20. The same,' being multiplied by twice the period added to one, and
being divided by three, is the sum of the squares.' The sum of the cube?
mainder by the period less one, is the common increase. For instance; Init. 2; DifF. ? Per. 7.
Sum TJ. Deducing the mean amount from the sum by the period, doubling it [and proceeding
in other respects as directed, the common difference comes out 3.*]
[If the first term and common difference be both unknown, deduce the mean amount from the
sum by its period ; and doubling it*] set down the result as a reserved quantity. Then put an ar-
bitrary common increase; and by that multiply the period less one. Subtract the product from
the reserved quantity : the moiety of the residue is the initial term; and the common increase, as
assumed. For instance : Init.? Diff. ? Per. 9. Sum 576. The quotient of this by the period is
the mean amount 6-i : the double of which is called the reserved quantity, 129. Putting one for
the common increase, the period less one, multiplied by that, is 8 : which being subtracted from the
reserved quantity, and the remainder being halved, yield Initial terra 60; Dift'. 1 ; Per. 9- Or>
putting two for the common difference, the result is Init. 56; Diff. 2 ; Per. 9; Sum 576. Or,
assuming two and a half, it comes out Init. 54 ; Diff. | ; Per. 9; Sum 576. This is applicable in
all cases and \x\ witole numbers.
But, if the fii-st term, common difference and period be all three unknown ; put an arbitrary
number for the period, and proceed as just shown.
If the difference, period, mean amount and sum total of a progression be required in square num-
bers, put any square {|uantity for the period of the progression. The period multiplied by sixteen
serves for the common difference; and the square of two less than the period for the initial term.
With these, the mean amount and sum total are found as before. For instance: let the square
number 9 be the period. Multiplied by sixteen, it gives 141. The period less two is 7 ; the
square of which, 49, is the initial term. Init. 49; Diff. 144; Per. 9; Mean amount 625. Sum
5625. All five are square numbers.
In like manner a variety of examples may be devised for the illustration of the subject. For
fear of rendering the book voluminous, they are not here instanced : as we have undertaken to in-
terpret the whole astronomical system (sidd'Mnta). Cii.
' A rule to find the content of a pile of sums. Ch.
Exampleif Per. 5. The sum of this, consisting of the arithmeticals one, &c. increasing by
one, is 15, which, multiplied by the period added to two, viz. 7, is 105. Divided by three, the
quotient is 35, the content, in bricks, of a pile of sums, the period of which is five. Cii.
* To find the content of a pile of quadrates ; and one of cubics. Ch.
* Example if Per. 5. This doubled, and having one added to it, is 1 1. The sum of the pe-
riod, viz. 15, being multiplied by that, is l65 : which divided by three, gives 55. It is the content,
iii bricks, of a pile of quadrates, the period of which is five. Ch.
* Tlie manuscript i< here de6cient : but tlie context renders it easy to supply tlie defect.
t The questioiu are not proposed in words at length : or else the manuscript \t in iliis respect deficient.
294 BRAHMEGUPTA. Chapter XII.
is the square of the same.* Piles [may be exhibited*] with equal balls [or
cubes ;* as a practical illustration*] of these [methods.*] '
^'•'"Example:! Per. 5. The sum of this is 15. Its square is 225 ; the content, in bricks, of a
pile of cubics, the period of which is five.
* Bricks in the form of regular dodecagons. — Ch. Meaning cubes. See LMvati, § 7, note.
* As the author has mentioned a pile of balls, the method of finding the content is here shown.
Let the area of the circle be found by the method subsequently taught [§40] and be reserved.
The square-root of it is to be extracted ; and by that root multiply the reserved area. This being
done, the area of the globe is found. But in the circle the area is an irrational quantity. This
again then is to be multiplied by the square of the surd : and the square-root of the product is the
content of the globe and is a surd. Cu.
* Chaturveda,
t The quettions are not propMed in words at length ■. or elie the manutoript » in tbii ropect deficient.
I
( 295 )
SECTION IV.
PLANE FIGURE.'
TRIANGLE and QUADRILATERAL.
21. The product of half the sides and countersides'' is the gross area of a
triangle and tetragon.' Half the sum of the sides set down four times, and
• Triangles are three ; tetragons five , and the circle is the ninth plane figure. Thus triangles
are (tama-tribhuja) equilateral, (dwi-sama-tribhuja) isosceles, and (vishamn-tribhiija) scalene.
Tetragons are (sama-chaturasra) equilateral ; (dt/ata-sama-chaturasra) oblong with equal sides [two
and two]; ( dwi-sama-cltaturasra) having two equal sides; ('/«-Mn!a-cAa/«rasraJ having three sides
equal; (vishama-chalurasra) \\a.\\ng a.\\ unequal. Ch.
* Bdhu-pratibdhu, or bhuja-pratibhuja (§23) : opposite sides.
' Example : What is the area of an equilateral triangle, the side of which is twelve ?
Statement- 12/ \12 The sum of sides and of countersides, 13 and 24; their moieties 6 and
L^ A 12 ; the product of which is 72, the gross area. .
Example : What is the area of an isosceles triangle the base of which is ten and the sides
thirteen ?
Statement: 13/ \l3 The moieties of the sums of opposite sides, 5 and i3; their product 65,
L \ the gross area.
10
Example : What is the area of a scalene triangle, the base of which is fourteen and the sides
thirteen and fifteen ?
Statement: W \l5 Answer: 98 the gross area.
14
Example : What is the area of an equilateral tetragon, the side of which is ten \
10
Statement: 10
10 Answer : 100, the gross as well as exact area.
10
296 BRAHMEGUPTA. Chapter XII.
severally lessened by the sides,' being multiplied together, the square-root
of the product is the exact area.*
Example : What is the area of an oblong, two sides of which are twelve ; and two, fivef
12
Statement: ,| 1, Answer: 60, the gross and exact area.
12
Example: What is the area of a quadrilateral having two equal sides thirteen, the base four-
teen, and the summit four?
4
Statement: l-y y3 Answer: 117 the gross area.
14
; Example: Tell the area of a quadrilateral having three equal sides twenty-five, and base thirty-
nine?
25
Statement : 25/ \25 Answer : 800 the gross area.
39
Example : Tell the gross area of a trapezium, of which the base is sixty, the summit twenty-
five, and the sides fifty-two and thirty-nine ?
Statement : 52/ ^39 Answer : 1933| the gross area. Ch.
60
' The sides of the quadrilateral are severally subtracted from the half of the sum in all four
places ; but the sides of the triangle are subtracted in three, and the fourth remains as it stood. Ch.
* Examples as above. Sides of the equilateral triangle 12; the sum 36; its half set down four
times 18, 18, 18, 18; which severally lessened by the sides gives 6, 6, 6, 18. The product of
those numbers is 3888, the surd root of which is the exact area.
Sides of the isosceles triangle 10, 13, 13; the sum 36. Its half 18, lessened severally by the
sides, gives 5, 5, 8, 18. The product whereof is 3600. The square-root of this is the exact area,
60.
Sides of the scalene triangle 14, 13, 15. HaJf the sum 21, less the sides, gives 7, 8, 6, 21.
Product 7056 ; the root of which is the exact area 84.
The gross area of the equilateral tetragon, as of the oblong, is the same with the exact area.
Sides of the tetragon with two equal sides, 14, 13, 13, 4. The exact area, as found by the rule,
is 108.
Sides of the tetragon having three equal sides, 39, 25, 25, 25. Exact area 768.
Sides of the trapezium 60, 52, 39, 25. Exact area 1764. Ch.
Putting a side of a tetragon equal to the segment of the base, and an upright equal to the pel-
Section IV. PLANE FIGURE. 297
22. The difference of the squares of the sides being divided by the base,
the quotient is added to and subtracted from the base:' the sum and the
remainder, divided by two, are tlie segments. The square-root, extracted
from the difference of the square of the side and square of its corresponding
segment of the base, is the perpendicular.'
23. In any tetragon but a trapezium, the square-root of the sum of the
products of the sides and countersides,' is tiie diagonal. Subtracting from
the square of the diagonal the square of half the sum of the base and sum-
mit, the square-root of the jemainder is the perpendicular.*
pendicular, the area of a figure is represented by little square compartments formed by as many
lines as are the numbers of the upright and side. Ch.
' The bottom (adhas) or lower line of every triangle is the base (bhli), literally ground. The
flanks (p&rswa) are termed the sides (bhuja). In an equilateral triangle, or in an equicrural one,
the two segments of the base are equal. In a scalene triangle, the greater segment answers to the
greater side; and the least segment to the least side. The perpendicular is the same, computed
from either side. Ch,
* Example : An isosceles triangle, the base of which is ten, and the sides thirteen.
Statement: 1^ \13 Answer: Segments 5 and 5. Perpendicular 12.
10
Example : A scalene triangle, the base of which is fourteen, and the sides thirteen and fifteen.
Statement : 13/
15 Answer: Segments 5 and 9- Perpendicular 12. Ch.
14.
The segments are found by halving the sum and difference : for it is directed in a subsequent
rule (§ 23) to subtract the square of the upright from that of the diagonal ; and the two segments
are thence deduced by the rule of concurrence. The perpendicular is found b}' extracting the
square-root of the remainder when the square of the side has been subtracted from the square of
the diagonal ; that remainder being the square of the upright : for the perpendicular is the up-
right, lb.
' The opposite sides ; (See § 21) the flanks, and the base and summit. Ch.
* Example : An equilateral tetragon, the side of which is twelve.
12
Statement: 12
12 Answer: Diagonal, the surd root of 288. Perpendicular 12.
12
The example of an oblong is similar.
fm
BRAHMEGUPTA.
Chapter XII.
24. Subtracting the square of the upright' from the square of the diago-
nal, the square-root of the remainder is the side; or subtracting the square
of the side, the root of the remainder is the upright : the root of the sum of
the squares of the upright and side is the diagonal.
25.* At the intersection of the diagonals, or the junction of a diagonal
and a perpendicular, the upper and lower portions of the diagonal, or of the
perpendicular and diagonal, are the quotients of those lines taken into the
corresponding segment of the base and divided by the complement* of the
segments.*
Example : A tetragon having two equal sides, thirteen ; and the base fourteen, and summit four.
4
Statement: ly \\l3 Answer: Diagonal 15. Perpendicular 12.
14
In like manner, a tetragon with three equal sides : (See § 26.) Ch.
The product of the base and summit is equal to the square of the greater segment less the square
of the least. The square of the flaiilts is equal to the square of the perpendicular added to the
square of the least segment. Their sum is the sum of the squares of the perpendicular and greater
segments, and is the sum of the squares of the upright and side : and its square-root conseejuently
is the diagonal. Half the sum of the base and summit is the greater segment: it is the side. Sub-
tracting the square of it from the square of the diagonal, the remainder is the square of the upright.
Its square-root is the upright termed the perpendicular. lb.
' One side being so termed (bcihu or bhvja), the other is called upright. It matters not which.
Ch.
* In tetragons having two or three equal sides, as above noticed, to show the method by which
the upper and lower portions of the diagonals, as divided by the intersection of the diagonals, may
be found : and the upper and lower portions of both diagonal and perpendicular, as divided by the
intersection of the perpendicular and diagonal. Ch.
' Swayuti, the line which joins the extremities of the perpendicular and diagonal. It is the
greater segment of the base or complement of the less : and answers to Bha'scaua's pii'Aa. Lit.
h 195.
* Example : The tetragon with two equal sides as last mentioned.
4
Statement :
The segment of the base 7, multiplied by the diagonal 15, makes 105.
Divided by the complement 9, the quotient is Ilf. It is the lower portion of the diagonal; and
subtracted from 15, leaves the upper portion 3^-. So for the second diagonal.
Section^ IV.
PLANE FIGURE.
299
26. The diagonal of a tetragon other than a trapezium, being multiphed
by the flank, and divided by twice the perpendicular, is the central line;'
and so is, in a trapezium, half the square-root of the sum of the squares of
opposite sides.^
27. The product of the two sides of a triangle, divided by twice the per-
In like manner, at the intersection of the perpendicular. The segment 5, multiplied by the dia-
gonal 15, and divided by the complement pi gives the lower portion 8^; which, subtracted from
the diagonal, leaves the upper portion 6f . The perpendicular likewise, 12, taken into the corre-
sponding segment 5, makes 60 ; which, divided by the complement 9j yields 6f the lower portion
of the perpendicular: and this, subtracted from 12, leaves 5^ the upper portion of it. Ch.
Put the proportion ' If the entire diagonal be hypotenuse answering to a side equal to the com-
plement, what will be the hypotenuse answering to a side equal to the given segment of the base?'
The result gives the portion of the diagonal below the intersection. A similar proportion gives
the segment of the perpendicular. Thus the lower portions are found : and, subtracting them from
the whole length, the remainder is the upper portion of the diagonal or of the perpendicular. lb.
' Hrldaya-rajju, the central line, is the semidiameter of a circle in contact with the angles. Ch.
In an equilateral or an oblong tetragon it is equal to the semidiagonal. — lb.
Cona-sprig-^rfttajOi bahir-vritta; a circle in contact with the angles ; an exterior circle: one cir-
cumscribed.
* Example: The tetragon with two equal sides, as last noticed.
4
The diagonal 15, multiplied by the side 13, is 195: divided by
13/ \ / \13 twice the perpendicular, the quotient is 8 -J^; the length of the
central line.
Example: The tetragon with three equal sides before exhibited (§ 21).
25
Diagonal 40, multiplied by the side 25, makes 1000;
which, divided by the perpendicular doubled, gives the
central line 20|.
Statement: "o
Example: The trapezium of which the base is sixty, the summit twenty-five, and the sides fifty-
two and thirty-nine.
The squares of the base and summit 60 and 25 are 3600 and
625. The sum is 4225; its root 65: the half of which ^
is the central line. Or the squares of the flanks 52 and 39
are 2704 and 1521 ; the sum of which is 4225; and half
the root, ^. Ch,
QQ2
Statement: 52.
300 BRAHMEGUPTA. Chapter XII.
pendicular, is the central line: and the double of this is the diameter of the
exterior circle.*
28.* The sums of the products of the sides about both the diagonals
being divided by each other, multiply the quotients by the sum of the pro-
ducts of opposite sides; the square-roots of the results are the diagonals in a
trapezium.'
• Example : An isosceles triangle, the sides of which are thirteen, the base ten, and the perpen-
dicular twelve.
-„ / \ ,a Product of the sides iSp; divided by twice the perpendicular, gives
Statement: yJ\{ the central line Zj^^.* Ch.
10
Let twice the perpendicular be a chord in a circle, the semidiameter of which is equal to the
diagonal. Then this proportion is put : If the semidiameter be equal to the diagonal in a circle in
which twice the perpendicular is a chord, what is the semidiameter in one wherein the like chord
is equal to the flank f The result is the semidiameter of the circumscribed circle, provided the
flanks be equal. But, if they be unequal, the central line is equal to half the diagonal of an
oblong the sides of which are equal to the base and summit ; or half the diagonal of one, the sides
of which are equal to the flanks. It is alike both ways. lb.
For the triangle the demonstration is similar; since here the diagonal is the side. lb.
* This passage is cited in Bha'scara's lAMvati, § 1£)0.
' Example : A tetragon of which the base is sixty, the summit twenty-five, and -the sides fifty-
two and thirty-nine.
Statement: / v/\ The upper sides about the greater diagonal are 39 and 25; the
60
product of which is 975. The lower sides about the same are 6o and 52 ; and the product 3120.
The sum of both products 4095. The upper sides about the less diagonal are 25 and 52 ; the
product of which is 1300. The lower sides about the same, 60 and 39; and the product 2340.
The sum of both 3640. These sums divided by each other are f gf^ and f^4^, or abridged ^ and §.
The product of opposite sides 60 and 25 is 1500; and of the two others 52 and 39 is 2028: the
sum of both, 3528. The two foregoing fractions, multiplied by this quantity, make 3969 and
3136; the square-roots of which are 63 and 56, the two diagonals of the trapezium. Ch.
This method of finding the diagonals is founded on four oblongs. lb.
The brief hint of a demonstration here given is explained by Gan'b's'a on L'Mvat't, § I91. Two
triangles being assumed, the product of their uprights is one portion of a diagonal, and the pro-
* The tnauuscript here exhibits 8} : but is manifestly corrupt: u is the text of the rule and in part the comment on it.
I
Section IV.
PLANE FIGURE.
301
duct of their sides is the other; as before shown. (Deni. of § 191 — 2.) The two sides on the one
part of the diagonal are deduced from the reciprocal multiplication of the hypotenuses of the as-
sumed triangles by their uprights: and the product of ihe sides is consequently equal to the pro-
duct of the uprights taken into the product of the hypotenuses. So the product of the two sides
on the other part of the diagonal, resulting from the reciprocal multiplication of the hypotenuses
by the sides of the assumed triangles, is equal to the product of the sides of the triangles taken into
the product of their hypotenuses. Therefore the sum of those products of the sides of the tra-
pezium is equal to the diagonal multiplied by the product of the hypotenuses. The sides about
the other diagonal are formed by the upright of one triangle and side of the other reciprocally
multiplied by the hypotenuses. Their product is equal to the product of the reciprocal upright
and side taken into the product of both hypotenuses. Hence the sum of the products is equal to
the diagonal multiplied by the product of the hypotenuses. Therefore dividing one by the other,
and rejecting like dividend and divisor (i. e. the product of the hypotenuses), there remain the
diagonals divided by each other. Now the sum of the products of the multiplication of opposite
sides is equal to the product of the diagonals [as will be shown]. Multiplying this by the fractions
above found, and rejecting equal dividends and divisors, there remain the squares of the diagonals:
and by extraction of the roots the diagonals are found. Now to show, that the sum of the pro-
ducts of opposite sides is equal to the product of the diagonals : the three sides of each of the as-
sumed triangles being multiplied by the hypotenuse of the other, two other rectangular triangles
are formed : and duly adapting together the halves of these, a figure is constituted, the sides of
which are equal to the uprights and sides of the two triangles. It is the very trapezium ; and its
area is the sum of the areas of the triangles.
4b?
3
12
13
Here half the product of the base and summit is the area of one triangle ; and half the product of
the flanks is so of the other. Therefore half the sum of the products of opposite sides is the area
of the quadrangle. Now the four triangles before mentioned, with four others equal to them, being
duly adapted together, these eight compose an oblong quadrilateral wiih sides equal to the diagonals
of the trapezium. See 48 15 Half the area of the oblong or product of the
20
36
r
^^^^-^
N^
^\
Ps
20
36
48 15
diagonals, as is apparent, will be the area of the trapezium. It is half the sum of the products of
opposite sides. Therefore the sum of the products of the opposite sides is equal to the product of
the diagonals. Gan.
S02
BRAHMEGUPTA.
Chapter XII.
29. Assuming two scalene triangles* within the trapezium, let the seg-
ments for both diagonals be separately found as before taught ; and then the
perpendiculars.*
30 — 31. Assuming two triangles within the trapezium, let the diagonals
be the bases of them.' Then the segments, separately found, are the upper
and lower portions formed by the intersection of the diagonals.* The lower
' The first with the greater diagonal for one side, and the least flank for the other side ; and the
second having the least diagonal for one side, and the greater flank for the other : and the base of
the tetragon being base of both triangles. Then the segments are to be separately found in both
triangular figures, by the rule before taught (§ 22); and then find the two perpendiculars by the
sequel of the rule. Ch.
* In the unequal tetragon just men-
tioned, one triangle will be this ^-
and the other this
63,
60
In the one the difference of the squares of the sides 432, divided by the base, gives 7 ^, which
subtracted from, and added to, the base, makes 52 J and 67 i- These divided by two are 26f
and 33 f the two segments. Whence, taking the root of the difference of the squares of the side
and its segment, the greater perpendicular is deduced 44 -J. In the other triangle, the two seg-
ments found by the rule are 9f and 50^; whence the least perpendicular comes out 37 f. Ch.
' The greater diagonal is the base of one ; and the summit and greater flank are its sides. The
least diagonal is the base of the other; and the summit and least flank are the sides. Ch.
* In the tetragon just now instanced, the scalene triangle with the greater diagonal for base is this
^5-
The segments of its base as found by the rule (f 22) are 48 and 15. These are respectively the
lower and upper portions of the greater diagonal.
The scalene triangle with the less diagonal for base is \~~;25 Here the segments, by the
same rule (§ 22), are 36 and 20. They are the lower and upper portions of the least diagonal.
Or find the segments of one only : the perpendicular, found by the rule (§ 22) is the upper por-
tion of the second diagonal : and subtracting that from the entire length, the remainder is the
Section IV. PLANE FIGURE. «0S
portions of the two diagonals are taken for the sides of a triangle ; and the
base [of the tetragon] for its base. Its perpendicular is the lower portion of
the [middle] perpendicular of the tetragon : the upper portion of it is the
moiety of the sum of the [extreme] perpendiculars less the lower portion.^
32.* At the intersection of the diagonals and perpendiculars, the lower
segments of the diagonal and of the perpendicular are found by proportion :
those lines less these segments are the upper segments of the same. So in
the needle^ as well as in the (pdia) intersection [of prolonged sides and per-
pendiculars].*
lower portion of it. Thus, in the foregoing example, the least segment in the first triangle is 15.
Its square 225, subtracted from the square of the least side 6"25, leaves 400, the root of which is
20. It is the upper portion of the smaller diagonal, and subtracted from the whole length 56,
leaves the lower portion 36. Cii.
' In the same figure, the scalene triangle composed of the two lower segments of the diagonals
together with the base is this /t\ Here the perpendicular found by the rule
60
(§ 22) is 28 ^. It is the lower portion of the mean perpendicular. The greatest and least perpen-
diculars being 4.4^ and 37 f, the moiety, of their sum is 41 -^. This is the length of the entire
mean perpendicular. Subtracting from it its lower segment the residue is its upper segment 12 |.
Ch.
* A rule to find the upper and lower portions of the diagonals and perpendiculars cut by the
intersection of diagonals and perpendiculars, within a trapezium ; also the lines of the needle and
a figure of intersection.
' Slichi, the needle ; the triangle formed by the produced flanks of the tetragon. The section
of a cone or pyramid.
Pata, samp6ta, tripdta, intersection ; of a prolonged side and perpendicular. The figure formed
by such intersection.
♦ Example : In a trapezium the base of which is sixty ; one side fifty-two ; the other thirty-
nine; and the summit twenty-five : the greater diagonal si.xty-three; the less, fifty-si.\ : the greater
perpendicular forty-five less one fifth ; its segments of the base, the greatest thirty-three and three-
fifths, the least twenty-six and two-fifths : the least perpendicular thirty-seven and four-fifths ; its
segments of the base, greatest fifty and two-fifths, least nine and three-fifths : the perpendicular
passing through the intersection of the diagonals, forty-one and three-tenths; its segments of the
base, greatest thirty-eight and two-fifths, least twenty-one and three-fifths; tell the upper and
lower portions of the perpendiculars, the intersections [of prolonged sides and perpendiculars] and
the needle.
304
BRAHMEGUPTA.
Chapter XII.
Here at the intersection of the diagonals, the segments of the greater diagonal, found as before
(§ 30), are 48 and 15 ; those of the less are 36 and 20.
h-"'
\ Kl
r^^«=*
Vh
■p]
y
/ »
'%i
/to
\
P^
V "^
\
<m K*
•^
'=>\39
•> 00
\
/ y^o
^
^
^\
33i
9f\
03
At the junction of the greater diagonal and greater perpendicular; the proportion is as diagonal
sixty-three to the complement* fifty and two fifths, so, to the segment twenty-six and two-fifths,
what? or rendered homogeneous, SAi | 63 | i-2-5. | . Answer: 33. It is the lower portion of the
diagonal. Again, as the same complement is to the least perpendicular, so is the above men-
tioned segment to what ? Statement: SA? I !A2 | L?i | Answer: 19^. It is the lower por-
5 5 5
tion of the perpendicular. Subtracting these from the whole diagonal 63 and entire perpendicular
44^, the remainders are the upper segments of the diagonal and perpendicular; 30 and 25.
Ne.Kt, at the junction of the less diagonal and less perpendicular : as the complement thirty-lhree
and three-fifths is to the diagonal fifty-six, so is the segment nine and three-fifths to what ? State-
ment: 33f I 56 I 9i I • Answer: l6, the lower portion of the diagonal. So, putting the perpen-
dicular for the middle term, the lower portion of the less perpendicular comes out 12^. By sub-
traction from the entire diagonal and perpendicular, their upper segments are obtained 40 and 25.
In like manner, for any given question, the solution may be variously devised with the segment
of the base for side, the segment of the perpendicular for upright, and the segment of the diagonal
for hypotenuse.
The operation on the needle is next exhibited
The segments of the base on either side of the perpendicular let fall from the top of the needle
come out 41 ^ and 18 -^.f With either of these segments the mean perpendicular is found by
proportion : if the least segment 9f give the least perpendicular 37f , what does the segment
18 -^ give ? Answer : 71 ^. It is the perpendicular let fall from the summit of the needle. In
the same manner, with the greater segment, the same length of the perpendicular is deduced.
Next, to find the sides of the needle : As the least perpendicular is to the side thirty-nine, so is
the middle perpendicular to what ? Statement : 37 f t 39 | 71 ^. Answer : 73 -f^. Or the side
may be found from the segments : thus g| | 39 | 18 ■^^. Answer ; 73 ^ as before. To find the
• Swayuti. See note to $ 25.
t The text relative to the inetbod of finding tliese legmenti it irretrievably corrupt; and has been therefore omitted
la thi version.
Section IV.
PLANE FIGURE.
305
greater side: As the greater perpendicular is to the side fifty-two, so is the perpendicular of the
needle to what? 44f | 52 | 7H^ | . Answer: 82-^. Or proportion may be taken with the
legments of the base: 26f | 52 | 41 -Jf | . Answer: 82 -f^, as before. See figure [as above].
Now to find the intersections [of the prolonged sides and perpendiculars]. If the segment of
the base belonging to the greater perpendicular, or 26 -j, answer to that perpendicular, 44 1^, what
will the segment 50 y answer to ? Answer: 85 3^, the perpendicular prolonged to the intersection.
Again: As the greater perpendicular 44 1^ is to the side 52, so is the perpendicular of the inter-
section 85^ to what? Answer : 99-ht the side of the figure. In like manner to find the per-
pendicular of the second figure of intersection : If the segment of the base appertaining to the less
perpendicular answer to this perpendicular, what does the segment thirty-three and three-fifths
correspond to ? Answer: 132 3^, the perpendicular of second figure. To find the side of the
same : As the least perpendicular 37 |- is to the side 39, so is the perpendicular just found 132 ^y
to what? Answer: 1363, the side. Or it may be found from the segments. Thus, as the seg-
ment answering to the least perpendicular, 9 J, is to the side 39, so is the segment 33 |- to what ?
Answer: the greater side 136J as before. See figure of the needle with the intersections and per-
pendiculars.
Va*
«.
\ J^
"IS
\ti
(N
=>i«t
m
/
'\
S<[iO
r-l
/
\
03
52/
£
\i9
'^
•^
Mf
4
60
In like manner, the flank intersections* are computed. If the segment appertaining to th»
greater perpendicular 26 1- answer to that perpendicular, what will the segment 60 correspond to ?
Answer: 101 -f\. To find the side of the same: As the segment of the base for the greater per-
pendicular is to the side fifty-two, so is the segment sixty to what? 26f | 52 | 60 | . Answer:
118-^. So, on the other part: If the segment of the base for the less perpendicular answer to
that perpendicular, what will the segment sixty correspond to? 9f [ 37^ | 60 | . Answer:
236 4. To find the side: As the least segment is to the side thirty-nine, so is the segment sixty to
what? 9i I 39 I 60. Answer: 245 j. See
236J
10>A
* Piritca-pita, tbe intersection of the prolonged flank and perpendicular railed at the eztramity of the base.
R R
906 B R A H M E GU PT A, Chapter XII.
33.* The sum of the squares of two unalike quantities are the sides of an
isosceles triangle ; twice the product of the same two quantities is the per-
pendicular ; and twice the difference of their squares is the base.'
34. The square of an assumed quantity being twice set down, and divided
by two other assumed quantities, and the quotients jjeing severally added to
the quantity first put, the moieties of the sums are the sides of a scalene
triangle : from the same quotients the two assumed quantities being sub-
tracted, the sum of the moieties of the differences is the base.'
35.* The square of the side assumed at pleasure, being divided and then
In the top above tbe summit of the trapezium A a distribution of the figure is to
be in like manner made by proportions selected at choice.
Since every where the segment of the base is a side, the corresponding perpendicular an upright,
and the flank an hypotenuse, the several lines above-stated may be found in various ways by the
rule, that subtracting the square of the upright from the square of the hypotenuse, the square-root
of the residue will be the side ; or that subtracting the square of the side, the root of the remainder
will be the upright.
In the same manner, in tetragons with two or three equal sides, the perpendicular of the needle
and its segments of the base are to be found. But there can be no needle to an equilateral tetra-
gon, nor to an oblong. Ch.
■ *^"Tb find an equicrural triangle ; preparatory to sliowing a rectangular one. The next follow-
ing rule (§34') is for finding a scalene triangle. An equilateral one may consist of any quantity
assumed at pleasure for the side ; since all the sides are equal. Ch.
* Example : Let the unalike quantities be put 2 and 3. Their squares are 4 and 9; the sum
of which is 13; and the sides are of this length. Twice the product is 12; and is the perpendi-
lar. Again, the squares of the same number are 4 and 9'- the difference is 5 ; which multiplied
by two makes 10, the base. [See § 22.] Ch,
' Example: Let 12 be assumed. Its square is 144. Put the two numbers 6 and 8 ; and
severally divide : the quotients are 24 and 18 : which, added to the number originally put, make
36 and 30, the moieties whereof are 15 and 13, the two sides. The same quotients, 24 and 18,
less the assumed numbers 6 and 8, make 18 and 10; the moieties of which are 9 and 5: and the
sum of these, 14, is the base. — Ch. [See § 22.]
♦ To find an oblong tetragon. The equilateral tetragon may be assumed with any quantity:
since all the sides arealike Ch. The subsequent rules, §36 — 38, deduce tetragons with two
and three e(iual sides or with all unequal.
Section IV. PLANE FIGURE. $S)f
lessened by an assumed quantity, the half of the remainder is the upright of an
oblong tetragon ; and this, added to the same assumed quantity, is the diagonal.^
36. Let the diagonals of an oblong be the flanks of a tetragon having
two equal sides. The square of the side of the oblong, being divided by an
assumed quantity and then lessened by it, and divided by two, the quotient
increased by the upright of the oblong is the base ; and lessened by it is the
summit.' » ,
37' The three equal sides of a tetragon, that has three sides equal, are the
squares of the diagonal [of the oblong]. The fourth is found by subtracting
the square of the upright from thrice the square of the [oblong's] side. If it
be greatest, it is the base; if least, it is the summit.'
38. The uprights and sides of two rectangular triangles reciprocally mul-
tiplied by the diagonals are four dissimilar sides of a trapezium. The greatest
is the base ; the least is the summit ; and the two others are the flanks.*
' Example: Let the side be put 5. Its square is 25, which divided by the assumed quantity
one makes 25; and subtracting from this the same assumed quantity, half the remainder is 12, and
is the upright. This added to the assumed divisor is the diagonal 13. — Ch. [See § 21 and 23.]
* Example : If the diagonal of the oblong be thirteen, the side twelve and the upright five;
what tetragon with two equal sides may be deduced from it? The diagonals 13 and 13 are the!
flanks. The square of the side 12 is 144. Divided by an assumed number 6, it gives 24; from
which subtracting the number put 6, remains 18; the half whereof is 9- This with the upright
5 added, makes 14, the base. Again, the same moiety 9, with the upright 5 subtracted, leave*
4, the summit. — Ch. [See § 21 and 23.]
' Example : Find a tetragon with three equal sides from an oblong the diagonal of which it
five, the side four, and upright three. Square of the diagonal 25 ; the length of the sides. Square
of the side l6, tripled, is 48 : from which subtracting 9. the square of the upright 3, the remainder
39 is the base. Or let the side be three and upright four. Square of the side tripled is 27 ; and
subtracting from this the square l6 of the upright 4, the remainder 11 is the summit. — Cii. [See
§21 and 26.]
* Example : In one oblong the diagonal is five, the upright three, and the side four. In the
second the diagonal is thirteen, the upright twelve, and the side five. The uprights and sides of
each of the two rectangular triangles, viz. 12, 5., 3, and 4, being multiplied by the diagonal (hy-
potenuse) of the other, give 60, 25, 39 and 52. Here the greater number 60 is the base; the
least 25 is the summit; the remaining two, 39 and 52, are the flanks. — Cu, [See §21 and 28.]
^ V V
60
R B 2
*)8 BRAIIMEGUPTA. Chapter XII.
39.' The height of the mountain, taken into a multiplier arbitrarily put,
is the distance of the town. That result being reserved, and divided by the
multiplier added to two, is the height of the leap. The journey is equal.*
40. The diameter and the scjuare of the semidiamcter, being severally
multiplied by three, arc the practical circumference and area. The square-
roots extracted from ten times the squares of the same are the neat
values.'
• Within an oblong tetragon, to describe a figure such, that the sura of the side and one portion
of the upright may be equal to ih-j diagonal and remaining portion of the upright : «o as the jour-
neys may be equal.— Cii. See Lildvati, § 154, and Vija-ganita, § 126; where the same problem
is introduced : substituting, however, in the example, a tree, an ape and a pond, for a hill, a
wizard and a town.
* Example : On the top of a certain hill live two ascetics. One of them, being a wizard, travels
through the air. Springing from the summit of the mountain, he ascends to a certain elevation,
and proceeds by an oblique descent, diagonally, to a neighbouring town. The other, walking
down the hill, goes by land to the same town. Their journeys are equal. I desire to know the
■ distance of the town from the hill, and how high the wizard rose.
This being proposed, the rule applies ; and its interpretation is this : any elevation of the moun-
tain is put; and is multiplied by an arbitrarily assumed multiplier: the product is the distance of
the town from the mountain. Then divide this reserved quantity by the multiplier added to two,
the quotient is the number of yojanas of the wizard's ascent. The sum of the hill's elevatioi\ and
wizard's ascent is the upright; the distance of the town from the mountain is the side : the square-
root of the sum of their squares is the diagonal (hypotenuse) : it is the oblique interval between the
town and the summit of the rise.
Thus, let the height of the mountain be twelve. This, multiplied by an arbitrarily assumed mul-
tiplier four, 12 by 4, makes 48. It is the distance of the town from the hill. This divided by the
multiplier added to two, 48 by 6, gives 8. It is the ascent. Here the upright is 20 : its square
is 400. The side is 48 ; the square of which is 2304. The sum of these squares is 2/04; an*
its square-root 52. The semirectangle* is thus found. ;"- .. Here also the sum
20 "■••4j?
12 ■■•••...
48
of the side and lower portion of the upright is 6o, the journey of one of the ascetics: and the
upper portion added to the hypotenuse is that of the other, likewise 60.
The author will treat of rectangular triangles and surd roots, in the chapter on Algebra (ciittacd-
JChy6yc[\J under the rule, which begins, " Be a surd the perpendicular. Its square, &c." We alsoi
shall there expound it. Ch.
' Example : Of a circle, the diameter whereof is ten, what is the circumference i and how
much the area ?
* Ayatdrd'ha, half an oblong,
t See Brahn. Alg. $ 36.
Section IV. PLANE FIGURE: CIRCLE. 309
41. In a circle the chord is the square-root of the diameter less the arrow
taken into the arrow and multiplied by four.' The square of the chord di-
vided by four times the arrow, and added to the arrow, is the diameter.'
Statement: / tn \ Diameter 10, multiplied by three, 30; this is the gross circum-
ference. Semidiameter 5 : its square 25 ; tripled, 75 ; the gross area for practice.
Diameter 10 : its square 100, multiplied by ten, 1000. The surd root of this is the circum-
ference of a circle the diameter whereof is ten. Square of the semidiameter 25 : This again
squared and decupled is 6250. Its surd-root is the area of the circle. Ch.
' Example: Within a circle, the diameter of which is ten, in the place where the arrow is
two, what is the chord ?
Diameter 10 : less the arrow 2 ; remains 8. This multiplied by the arrow makes l6; which
multiplied by 4, gives 6'4 : the square-root of which is 8. See figure
:8 a
The principle of the rule for finding the square of the chord (in the construction of tabular sines)
is here to be applied. But the square is in this place multiplied by four, because the entire chord
is required. Cn.
* Example : Chord 8. Its square 64, divided by four times the arrow 2, viz. 8; gives the
quotient 8 : to which adding the arrow, the sum is 10.
Example 2d : A bambu, eighteen cubits high, was broken by the wind. Its tip touched the
ground at six cubits from the root. Tell the length of the segments of the bambu.
Statement: Length of the bambu 18. It is the diameter less the least arrow.* The ground
from the root, to the point where the tip fell, is 6 : it is the semichord. Its square is 36. This is
equal to the diameter less the arrow multiplied by the arrow. Dividing it by the diameter less the
arrow, viz. 18, the quotient is 2. It is the arrow. Adding this to the diameter less the arrow, the
sum is the diameter, 20. Half of this, 10, is the semidiameter. It is the upper portion of the
bambu and is the hypotenuse. Subtracted from eighteen, it leaves the upright, or lower portion
of the bambu, 8. The side is the interval between the root and tip, 6. The point of fracture of
the bambu is the centre of the circle. See figure
Example 3d : In limpid water the stalk of a lotus eight fingers long was to be seen.f
That visible [portion of] stalk is the smaller arrow. The place of submersion, 24, is the semi-
• What is termed by us " diameter less tlie arrow," is by Arya-bhatta denominated the greater arrow. For he
says, ' In a circle the product of the arrows is equal to the square of the semichord of both arcs.' Ca.
t The remainder of the passage, in which the qaestian was proposed, is wanting.
310 BRAHMEGUPTA. Chatter XII.
42.' Half tlie difference of the diameter and the root extracted from the
difference of the squares of the diameter and the chord is tl>e smaller arrow.*
chord. From the square of this [semi-]chord 576 divided by the smaller arrow 8, the quotient 72
is obtained, which is the greater arrow. The sum of both arrows, viz. 80, is the diameter of the
circle. Its half is 40, the semidiameter. It is the hypotenuse, and is the length of the stalk of
lotus. Subtracting the smaller arrow, the remainder is the depth of water and is the upright 52.
The side is the space to the place of submersion and is the semichord. See
Example 4th : A cat, sitting on a wall four cubits high, saw a rat prowling eight cubits from
the foot of the wall. The rat too perceived the puss and hastened towards its abode at the foot of
the wall ; but was caught by the c&t proceeding diagonally an equal distance. In what point
within the eight cubits was the rat caught ; and what was the distance they went ? Tell me, if thou
be conversant with computation concerning circles.
Statement : Height of the wall 4. Distance to which the rat had gone forth 8. These are
semichord and greater arrow. The square of the semichord, l6, being divided by the greater
arrow 8, the quotient is the smaller arrow 2. The sura of both arrows is the diameter 10. Its
half is the semidiameter 5. It is the rat's return. Subtracting it from the eight cubits, the re-
mainder is the interval between the foot of the wall and point of capture, or upright 3. The side
is 4. The root of the sum of their squares is the hypotenuse : it is the cat's progress, and is equal
to the rat's progress homewards.*
Let the figure be exhibited as before. In the centre of it is the place of capture.
In like manner other examples may be'shown for the instruction of youth. Else all this is ob*
vious, when the relation of side, upright and hypotenuse is understood. Ch.
' The chord and diameter being given, to find the smaller arrow. And, when two circles, the
diameters of which are known, cut each other, to find the two arrows. Ch.
* Example: Chord 8. Its square 64. Diameter 10. Its square 100. Difference 36. Its
root 6. Subtracting this from the diameter 10, the moiety of the remainder is 2 and is the smaller
arrow.
The same figure is here contemplated. Within it let an oblong be inscribed, with the chord for
its side, the diflerence between the diameter and twice the arrow for its upright, and the entire
diameter for its diagonal. It is this -^^32:^^ Here, the square-root of the diflerence between
the squares of the diameter and chord is equal to the root of the residue of subtracting the square
of the side from the square of the diagonal, and is the upright : and, that being taken from the
diameter, two portions remain equal to the smaller arrow, one at either extremity. Hence the
rule § 42. Let all this be shown on the figure. Ch.
• The three last instances are imitated in Bhascara's IMvati, J 148—153, and Vlj.-gim. J U4— U5 and 139.
Section IV. PLANE FIGURE: CIRCLE. 311
The erosion' being subtracted from both diameters, the remainders, multi-
pHed by the erosion and divided by the sum of the remainders, are the arrows.*
43.' The square of the semichord being divided severally by the given
arrows, the quotients, added to the arrows respectively, are the diameters.*
The sum of the arrows is the erosion : and that of the quotients is the residue
of subtracting the erosion.'
' Gr^a, the erosion, the raorcei bitten ; the quantity eclipsed.
Samparca, intersection.
* Example : The measure of Rdhu is fifty-two ; that of the moon, twenty-five : the erosion is
seven.
Diameters 52 and 25. Remainders after subtracting the erosion 45 and 18. These multiplied
by the erosion, make 315 and 126: which, divided by the sum of the residues 63, give 5 and 2,
for the segments cut by a chord passing through the points of intersection of the circles. The
arrow of Rdhu is two ; that of the moon five. See
Here the erosion is the profit; and the diameters less the erosion, are the contributions; and the
segments are found by the rule, § l6. The greater quotient belongs to the least circle; and the
less quotient, to the greater circle. Ch.
^ In the liite case of the intersection of two circles, the chord and arrows being known, to find
the diameters : And, the diameter and arrows being given, to deduce the quantity eclipsed and
the residue. Ch.
♦ E.xample : The intersection of the circles last mentioned.
Chord 20. Its half 10 : the square of which is 100. Divided by the two arrows severally, viz.
5 and 2 ; the quotients are 20 and 50 : which, with the arrows respectively added, make 25 and
52. They are the diameters. See foregoing diagram.
Demonstration : So much as is the square of the semichord, is the square of greater and less
arrows multiplied together. The quotient of the division thereof by the less arrow is the greater
arrow ; and the sum of the greater and less arrows is the diameter, as even the ignorant know.
Ch.
' Example : The arrows just found, 5 and 2. Their sum is 7. It is the erosion or quantity
eclipsed. The quotients 20 and 50. Their sum 70. It is the residue, subtracting the erosion
[from the sum of the diameters].
The principle is here obvious. Ch.
( 312 )
SECTION V.
EXCAVATIONS.
44. The area of the plane figure, multiplied by the depth, gives the con-
tent of the equal [or regular] excavation; and that, divided by three, is the
content of the needle.'
In an excavation having like sides [length and depth] at top and bottom,
[but varying in depth,] the aggregates* [or products of length and depth of
the portions] being divided by the common length, [and added together,] give
the mean depth.'
" 45 — 46. The area, deduced from the moieties of the sums of the sides at
top and at bottom, being multiplied by the depth, is the practical measure
' Example: Tell the content of a well, in which the sides are ten and twelve, alike above and
below, and the depth five.
Statement:
Here the area is 120: which, multiplied by the depth 5, gives
the content in cubic cubits, 600.
In the like instance, if the well terminate in a point, the foregoing divided by three gives 200,
the content of the needle or pyramid.
* Aicya, lit. aggregate : explained by the commentator the product of the length and depth of
the portions or little excavations ditfering in depth.
Ecigra, the whole of the long side which is subdivided,
Snma-rajju, equal or mean string: the mean or equated depth (sama-bedtha).
' pxample: A well thirty cubits in length, and eight in breadth, comprises within it five por-
tions of excavation, by which the side is subdivided into parts measuring four, &c. [up to eight].
The depth severally measures nine, seven, seven, three and two. Say quickly wha't is the mean
ttring [mean depth] of the excavations.
)
k
Section V.
EXCAVATIONS.
513
of the content.* Half the sum of the areas at top and at bottom, multiplied
by the depth, gives the gross content. Subtracting the practical content
from the other, divide the difference by three, and add the quotient to the
practical content, the sum is the neat content.-
Statement :
30
9
4
7
5
\
37
2 e L
y^
^
^
Here the aggregates in their order are
36, 35, 42, 21, 16. These, divided by the whole length 30, give 1% ^ %% %\ |f ; which
added together mnke '^^ ; the quotient is the mean depth 5. The area of the plane figure 240,
multiplied by that, is 1200. It is the solid content of the entire excavation. It may be proved by
adding together the several contents of the parts : viz. of the 1st, 288; of the 2d, 280 ; of the 3d,
336 ; of the 4th, l6s ; of the 5th, 128 : total 1200.
' Vyavahdrka, designed for practical use.
Autra, gross. [The etymology and proper sense of the term are not obvious j and are unex-
plained.]
Sucskma, neat, or correct.
* E.tample: A square well, measured by ten cubits at the top and by six at the bottom, is
dug thirty cubits deep. Tell me the practical, the gross, and the neat contents.
Here the side at the lop is 10 ; that at the bottom is 6. The sum of these is \6; its moiety 8.
The same in the other directions, 8. The area with these sides is 64; which, multiplied by the
depth 30, makes 192O. It is the practical content.
Sides at the top 10, 10. Area deduced from them 100. Sides at the bottom 6, 6, Area de-
duced from these 36. Sum of the areas 136. Its half 68; multiplied by the depth 30, makes
2040. It is the gross content.
Subtracting the practical content from this, the difference is 120. Divided by three, it gives
40. Adding this to the practical content J 920, the sum is i960 the neat content.
s s
:i ■
( 314 )
SECTION VI.
STACKS.'
47. The area of the form [or section]* is half the sum of the breadth at
bottom and at top muhiphed by the height : and that multipUed by the
length is the cubic content : which divided by the soHd content of one brick,
is the content in bricks.'
' There is iw difference in principle between the measure of excavations and of stacks ; unless
that what is there depth is here height. Every thing else is alike in both. Ch.
* Acriti : the form or shape of the wall, as it appears in one cubit's length, according to it»
height and the thickness at bottom and top. — Ch. Section of the wall.
' Example 1st : Tell the content of a stack which is a hundred cubits in length ; five in thick-
ness at bottom, and three at top ; and seven high.
3
Statement:
7^
3
5 100
Breadth at top 3; at bottom 5. Sum 8. Its half 4, multiplied by 7, is 28: which, multiplied
by the length 100, makes 2800. So many are the cubic contents in the wall. The dimensions of
a brick may be arbitrarily assumed. Say a cubit long; half of one broad ; and a sixth part thick.
Statement: i J i- Product-^. The whole cubic amount 2800,, divided by that, gives 3360O
for the number of bricks.
Example 2d: A sovereign piously caused a quadrangle to be built for a college, the wall
measuring a hundred cubits without and ninety-six within, and seven high, with a gate four by
three, and wickets half as big on the sides. How many bricks did it contain ?
100
Here the area of the exterior figure is 10,000i
that of the interior one 92l6. The difference
is 784. It is the area of the figure covered by
the walls. Multiplied by the height 7, it
gives the content 5488; from which subtract-
ing the gates 36, the remainder is the exact
cubic content 5452. Dividing this by the
content of a brick -jV, the quotient is the num-
ber of bricks 65424,
Statement:
( 315 )
SECTION VII.
SAW.
48 — 49. The product of the length and thickness in fingers, being mul-
tiplied by the number of sections and divided by forty-two, is the measure in
cishcangulas.' That quotient, divided by ninety-six, gives the work,' if
the timber be Mca or the like;* but, if it be sdlmali, the divisor is two hun-
dred; if vijaca, a hundred and twenty; if sola, saraiia and the rest, one
hundred; if sapta-viddru, sixty-four.*
' Ayima, breadth, or rather (dairghya) length. Vistara, width, or rather (ghanatvia) thick-
ness. Mdrga, the way or path of the saw ; the section. Ciskcangula, a technical term in use with
artisans. Carman, the work ; that is, the rate of the workman's pay : a technical use of the term.
Ch.
* Sdca, Tectona grandis. Salmali, Bombax heptaphyllum: it is the softest wood used for tim-
ber. Vijaca, Citrus medica. Sdla, Shorea robusta. Saraiia, same with Sarah? Pinus longi-
folia. Vidaru, not known. C'hadira, Mimosa Catechu ; the hardest wood employed as timber.
The following passage of Arya-bhat'ta is cited by Gan'esa in his commentary on the LUavat'i.
' The product of the breadth [or length] and thickness, in fingers, being multiplied by the intended
sections, and divided by five hundred and seventy-six, the quotient is the (p'hala) superficial
measure of the cutting, provided the timber be C'hadira (Mimosa catechu). If the wood be Sriparnl
( ), Sdcaca (Tectona grandis), &e. the divisor should be put three hundred and fifty ;
if the wood be /am6« (Eugenia Jamboo), Fya (Citrus medica), Cadamba (Nauclea orientalis and
Cadamb), or Amli (Tamarindus indica), it should be twenty less than four hundred. The divisor
should be two hundred and fifty, if the timber be Sdla, Antra and Sarala (Shorea robusta, Mangi-
fera indica and Pinus longifolia). If it be Salmali (Bombax heptaphyllum), &c. the divisor is two
hundred. Money is to be paid according to the divisor.'
* Example : A seasoned timber of (Vijdca) citron wood, ten cubits in length and six fingers in
width [thickness], is sawed in seven sections. Say what is the price of the labour, if the rate of
work be eight paiia.i.
Statement: - j ^ Product of tlie thickness 6, by the length 240, is 1440.
240
Multiplied by 7, it makes 10080 ; which, divided by forty-two (42), gives 240. These are cish-
cangulas. The timber being wood of the yija tree, that is divided by one hundred and twenty.
The quotient is the quantity of the work, 2. Multiplierl by the rate of the pay, viz. 8, the product
is the number oi ■paiias ifi. This amount is to be paid to the artisan. Ch.
s s 2
( 316 )
SECTION VIII.
MOUNDS OF GRAIN.
50. The ninth part of the circumference is the depth [height] in the case
of bearded com; the tenth part, in that of coarse grain; and the eleventh,
in that of fine grain.' The height, multiplied by the square of the sixth
part of the circumference, is the content.*
51. The circumference of a mound resting against the side of a wall, oi
within or without a corner, is multiplied by two, by four, or by one and a
third; and, proceeding as before, the content is found; and that is divided
by the multiplier which was employed.
' S&cin, bearded- com : viz. rice, as sliasitic^ and Ait rest.
St'hula, coarse grain : barley, &c.
Aiiu, fine grain : mustard and the like. Cir;
* The content, as thus found, is the number of solid cubits; (the circumference having beea
taken with the cubit:) and thence the number of prast'/tas is to be deduced, by the rule of three,
According to the proportion of tlie cubit to the particular /jras^'Ao in use. — Ch. It is the content
in solid cubits or c'hdns of Magad'ha. — Gatl. sir. Ch. 12.
' Example : What is the content of a rooiind of rice upon level ground, tJ>e circumference
being thirty-six ?
Statement : Circum. 36. Its ninth part 4, This is the height of the mound. The sixth part
of the circumference of the mound is 6 ; its square is 36 : multiplied by the height, it makes 144,
the content of the mound in cubits.
Example 2d : A mound of barley, the circumference of which is thirty ? Answer: 75.
Example 3d : A mound of mustard see<l, sixty-six cubits in circumference? Answer : 726.
Example 4th : A mound of rice resting against a wall, and measuring eighteen ? ^
18 doubled is 36. With this circumference the content found as before is 144; which, divided ^]
by the particular multiplier 2, gives 72, the solid content in cubits of the portion of a mound.
Example 5th : A mound of rice resting against the outer angle of a wall and measuring twenty-
seven ?
27 multiplied by one and a third makes 36, the circumference. Hence the content 144 ; which,
divided by the particular multiplier f , gives lOS, the content of a mound that is a quarter less than
a full one.
Shaihtiea or Shatti ; volg. Su'ti (Hind) : so named because it U sown and reaped in siity da^ s. Or^za sativn ; Tur.
♦
( 317 )
SIC
SECTION IX.
MEASURE BY SHADOW.
52.' The half clay being divided by the shadow (measured in lengths of
the gnomon) added to one, the quotient is the elapsed or the remaining
portion of day, morning or evening. The half day divided by the elapsed
or remaining portion of the day, being lessened by subtraction of one, the
residue is the number of gnomons contained in the shadow.*
.53.' The distance between the foot of the light and the bottom of the
gnomon, multiplied by the gnomon of given length, and divided by the dif-
ference between the height of the light and the gnomon, is the shadow.*
• To find the time from the shadow ; and the shadow from the time. Cti.
* This rule being useless, no example is given. It does not answer for finding either the shadow
or the time, in a position even equatorial ; but has been noticed by the author in this place, copying
earlier writers of treatises on computation, Cii.
See the concluding chapter of Skid'hara's Gariila-sura, where the same rule is given, and
examples of it subjoined.
' Given the length of the gnomon standing at a known distance from the foot of a light in a
known situation, to find the shadow. Ch.
♦ E.xamplc : The height of the light to the tip of the flame is a hundred fingers. [The distance
a hundred and ten. The gnomon twelve.*]
1 10, multiplied by the gnomon 12, is 1320. Subtracting the gnomon 12 from the height 100, the
remainder is 88. Dividing by this, the quotient is 15, the shadow of a gnomon twelve fingers
high.
Here the rule of three terms is applicable : if an upright equal to the difference of the two
heights answer to a side equal to the interval of ground between the foot of the light and the
jjjiomon, what will answer to the given gnomon ? See
100
125 15
• Tbc text u deficient : but u aupplied by the operation in the ipqael.
318
BRAHMEGUPTA.
Chapter XII.
54.' The shadow multiplied by the distance between the tips of the
shadows and divided by the difference of the shadows, is the base. The
base, multiplied by the gnomon, and divided by the shadow, is the height
of the flame of the light.*
• The difference between two positions of the gnomon being known, to find the distance between
the foot of the light and gnomon ; and the elevation of the light: Ch.
* The shadow of a gnomon twelve fingers high is in one place fifteen fingers. The gnomon being
removed twenty-two fingers further, its shadow is eighteen. The distance between the tips of the
shadows is twenty-five. The difference of the length of the shadows is three.
Distance between the tips of the shadows 25. By this multiply the shadows 15 and 18 : the
products are 375 and 450; which, divided by the difference of the shadows 3, give the several
quotients 125 and 150. They are the bases; that is, the distances of the tips of the shadows from
the foot of the light.
100
150 110 40
The grounds or bases 125 and 150, multiplied by the gnomon 12, make 1500 and 1800; which,
divided by the respective shadows, give the quotients 100 and 100 ; or the elevation of the light,
alike both ways.
Here also the operation of the rule of three is applicable : ' If to the difference of the shadows
answers a side equal to the distance between the tips of the shadows, what will answer to the length
of the shadow ?' The answer is a side, which is the distance of the foot of the light to the tip of
the shadow.
So to find the upright, the proportion is : 'If an upright equal to the gnomon answer to a side
equal to the shadow, what will answer to a side equal to the base ?' The answer gives the height
of the flame of the light.
r
( 319 )
Oi;fi
SECTION X.
SUPPLEMENT.
55.* The multiplicand is repeated like a string for cattle,* as often as there
are integrant portions^ in the multiplier, and is severally multiplied by them,
and the products are added together : it is multiplication. Or the multipli-
cand is repeated as many times as there are component parts in the multiplier.*
' In the rule of multiplication (§ 3) it is said " The product of the numerators divided by the
products of the denominators is multiplication." But how the product is obtained was not explained.
On that account the author here adds a couplet to show the method of multiplication. Cii.
* Go-sutricd; a rope piqueted at both ends; with separate halters made fast to it for e9,ch.,o,\
or cow. ."Cl— ?.r 4
' Chanda; portions of the quantity as they stand ; contrasted with hheda, segments or divisions;
being component parts, which, added together, make the whole; or aliquot parts, which, multiplied
together, make the entire quantity.
♦ Example : Multiplicand two hundred and thirty-five. Multiplicator two hundred and
eighty-eight.
The Multiplicator is repeated as often as there are portions in the multiplicator: 235
235
235
8
8
Multiplied by the portions of the multiplier in their order, there results 470 : which, added
1880
1880
together according to their places, make 6768O.
Or the multiplicand is repeated as often as the parts 9> 8, 151, 120; and multiplied by them
235 9 2115 The sum. is the quantity resulting from multiplication, as before,. 6768O.
235 8 1880
235 151 35485
235 120 28200
Or the parts of the multiplier are taken otherwise : as thus 9, 8, 4 ; the continued multipli-
cation of which is equal to the multiplier 288. So with others. And the multiplicand is succes-
sively multiplied by those divisors, which taken into each other equal the multiplicator. Thiis
tlie multiplicand 235, multiplied by 9, makes 2115; which, again, taken info 8, gives l6'920;
and this, multiplied by 4, yields 6768O.
This method by parts is taught by Scanda-sexa and others. In like manner the other methods
of multiplication, as tat-st'ha and mpaia-sandhi, taught by the same authors, may be inferred by
the student's own ingenuity. Cb.
320 BRAHMEGUPTA. Chapter XIL
56. If the multiplicator be too great or too small,* the multiplicand is to-
be multiplied by the excess or defect as put ; and the product of the multi-
plicand by the quantity so put is added or subtracted.*
57- The quotient of a dividend by a divisor increased or diminished by
an assumed quantity,' is reserved ; and is multiplied by the assumed quan-
tity, and divided by the original divisor; and the quotient of this division,
added to, or subtracted from, the reserved quantity, is the correct quotient.*
58. The product of quotient and divisor,' being divided by the multi-
plicator, is the multiplicand; or divided by the multiplicand, is the multi-
Sridhaba's rule is as follows : ' Placing tbe multiplicand under the multiplying quantity in the
order of tbe foldings (cap&ia-sand'hi crama), multiply successively, in the direct or in the inverse
order, repeating the multiplier each time. This method is termed capita-sand'hi* The next is
termed tatst'ha, because the multiplier stands still therein (tastnin tisht'hati). By division of the
form or separation of the digits Cfupa-st'hdna-vihMga) that named from parts Cc'handa) becomes
two-fold. These are four methods for the operation of multiplication (pratyutpanna) .' — Gari.-tdr.
§ 15—17.
When the quantity to be multiplied has by mistake been multiplied by a multiplicator too
great or too small ; to correct the error in such case, the author adds a couplet. Cii.
* Example: Multiplicand 15 ; multiplicator 20. This multiplicand has, by mistake, been mul-
tiplied by four more, viz. by 24. The product is 360. Here the number put is 4; and multipli-
cand 15 : their product 60. It is subtracted from the number as multiplied : and, with a reproof
to the blundering calculator, he is told " the true product is 300."
Or the multiplicand has been multiplied by four less ; viz. l6; and the product stated is 240.
Here the product of the multiplicand and number put is 60; which is added, as the multiplication
was short ; and the correct result is 300. Cii.
^ When the dividend has been divided by a divisor increased or diminished by an assumed
quantity ; to correct the quotient. Cu.
* Example : Dividend 300. Original divisor 20.
The division being made with that increased by four, viz. 24, the quotient was 12 J. This is
reserved, and is multiplied by the assumed number 4 : product 50 : whence, by the original divisor,
the quotient is had 2j. This, added to the reserved quantity 12 J, makes 15.
Or the same dividend 300, being divided by four less than the right divisor, viz. by J6, the
quotient was 18|. This multiplied by the assumed number 4, makes 75; which divided by the
original divisor 20, yields 3|: and this quotient, subtracted from the reserved quantity 18 |,
leaves 15. Cii.
' Of multiplicand, multiplicator, divisor and quotient, to find any one, the rest being knowa.
Ciu
* ftom capdta, a folding door, and sand'hi, junction.
Section X. SUPPLEMENT. 321
plicator : the product of multiplicand and multiplier, divided by the divisor,
is the quotient ; or divided by the quotient, is the divisor.'
59. If two of the quantities, whether multiplicand and multiplicator, or
divisor and quotient, be wanting-,'^ [the given quantities are to be changed
for the others, and arbitrary quantities to be put in their places.']*
60. Multiply the multiplicand or the multiplicator by the denominator
of the divisor : and the divisor is to be multiplied by the denominator of the
multiplicand, aiid by that of the multiplicator.'
61. Making unity denominator of an integer, let all the rest of the pro-
• Example: Divisor 20; multiplicand 32 ; multiplicator 5 ; quotients.
First to find the multiplicand. The product of divisor and quotient, 20 and 8, is l60 : which,
divided by multiplicator 5, gives 32.
Next for the multiplicator. The product of divisor and quotient is l60; which, divided by the
multiplicand 32, yields 5.
Then for the quotient. The product of the multiplicand and multiplier, 32 and 5, is l60 :
which, divided by the divisor 20, affords 8.
Lastly, for the divisor. The product of the multiplicand and multiplier is l60: which, divided
by the quotient 8, produces 20. Ch.
* If a couple of the quantities be wanting [that is, unknown], to find ihem. Ch.
' The text is deficient in the manuscript ; but is here supplied from the commentator's gloss.
♦Example: Divisor 20; multiplicand 32; multipliers; quotients.
The multiplicator and multiplicand being wanting ; the divisor and quotient are 20 and 8. These
are put for multiplicand and multiplicator. Their product is l60. Hence, putting four for the
quotient, the divisor is found 40; or putting eight, it is 20: and so on arbitrarily. Or the arbi-
trary number may be the divisor; whence the quotient is to be deduced : and so on variously.
Or, the divisor and quotient being wanting, the multiplicand and multiplicator are 32 and 5.
These are converted into divisor and quotient, or quotient and divisor. Their product is l60'
Putting ten, an assumed quantity, either for the multiplicand or for the multiplicator; the other,
namely multiplier or multiplicand, is deduced l6: or, putting five, the number deduced is 32. So,
a hundred different ways. Ch.
' To make the terms homogeneous in the rule of three.— Ch. It it thesarae in effect with that
before delivered and expounded. § 4: lb.
T T
822 BRAHMEGUPTA. Chapter XIL
cess be as above described.' The divisor and multiplicator, or divisor and
multiplicand,'' arc to be abridged by a common measure.'
62. The integer, multiplied by the sexagesimal parts of the fraction be-
longing thereto, and divided by thirty, is the square of the fractional por-
tion* to be added to the square of the whole degrees.' A s(juare and a cube
are the products of two, and of three, like quantities multiplied together.*
63.'' Twice the less portion* of a quantity [added to the greater'] being
multiplied by the greater and added to the square of the less, is the entire
square." Or, an arbitrary number being added to, and subtracted from, the
' It has been so shown by us in preceding examples. — Ch. SeenoteoD§5.
* Never the multiplicand and multiplicator. Cii.
' They are to be reduced to least terms by a 'common divisor, if the case comport it; to abbre*
Tiate the work.
Example: Divisor 20; multiplicand 40.
These, being abridged by the common measure twenty, become 1,2.
So, divisor 20; multiplicator 4.
Reduced by the common measure four, they become 5, I.
* Vicala-varga, square of the minutes; the multiple of the fraction to be added to the square of
the integer, to complete the square of the compound quantity. See §64.
' To find the square of a quantity, that includes minutes of a degree. Ch.
The rule may be stated otherwise [and more generally]. The integer, multiplied by the nu-
merator of its attendant fraction, which has a given deiiominator, being divided by [half J its de-
nominator, is to be added to the square of the integer portion. — Ibid. This method gives the
square grossly: being less than the truth by the product of the minutes by minutes, expressed in
sexagesimal seconds. lb.
Example: What is the square of fifteen degrees and a half? Statement : 13° 30'.
The integer 15, multiplied by the sexagesimal parts or minutes, 30, is 450: which, divided by
thirty, gives 15, to be added to the square of the whole degrees, or 225 ; making in all 240.
So square of twelve and a twelfth part? Statement: 12° 05'. Answer: 146.
* Definition of square and cube. — Ch. The continued multiplication of four or more like quan-
tities is termed tadgata, as the author afterwards notices in the chapter on Algebra CcuttaLdd'hyiit/aJ.
ib.
'' To find the square of a quantity. Cii.
* Or the greater may be taken ; or any two portions of the proposed quantity may be employed ;
or a greater number of portions, Ch.
9 The text is obscure, and the comment deficient : but either it must be thus supplied, or the
sense must be ' the quantity added to its least portion' : or else the square of the greater portion, as
well as of the less, must be added after the multiplication.
'" Example : Square of twenty-five.
Here five is the less portion, and twenty the greater. The less portion of the quantity doubled
I
Section X. SUPPLEMENT. 323
quantity, the product of the sum and difference, added to the square of the
assumed number, is the square required.^
64 — 65.' To the square of the given least quantity add the square of the
fractional portion^ of the other, and from it subtract the same:* the sum and
difference are divided by twice the other number,^ and in the second place
by the same divisor together with the first quotient added and subtracted:
the [last corrected] divisor with the same quotient [again] added and sub-
tracted, being halved, is the root* of the sum and of the difference of squares.
Or the other number, with the quotient added and subtracted, is so.^
[and added to the greater] is 30 : which, being multiplied by the greater, makes 600. The square .
of the less 25. Their sum is 625, the square of twenty-five.
Or the greater portion [added to the quantity] is 45 : which, multiplied by the less is 225.
Added to the square of the greater, viz. 400, the sum is 625.
Or one portion of the quantity 20 [doubled and] multiplied by the second, makes 200 : and
this, added to the squares of the portions, 400 and 25, gives 625.
Or one portion of the quantity 5, doubled, and multiplied by the other, makes 200; and this,
added to the squares of the portions, produces 625.
Or let there be three portions of twenty-five : as 5, 7 and 13. One portion of the quantity, 5,
doubled, is 10: which, multiplied by the second 7, makes 70: and added to the squares of the
portions, viz. 25 and 49, produces 144. Its root is 12 : with which and with thirteen the operation
■ proceeds. Ch.
' Example 25.
Adding and subtracting the arbitrarily assumed number five, it becomes 30 and 20. The pro-
duct of these is 600 : which, added to the square of the assumed number 5, viz. 25, makes 625.
Ch.
* To find a quantity such that its square shall be equal to the sum of the squares, or to the dif-
ference of the squares, of two quantities, of which the greater does not exceed the square of the
fractional portion, nor the square of the less number. Ch.
^ Square of the sexagesimal minutes ; that is, the multiple of the fraction. See § 62.
* The rule serves for finding both quatitiesat once ; the additions being every where adapted to
bring out the root of the sum of the squares; and the subtractions, to give the root of the difference
of the squares.
' Itara, the other; other than the least; that is, the greater number.
' Approximately.
* Example for the sum : Let the greater number, termed the other quantity, together with its
minutes, be 15° 40'; and the least be 14. The square of the latter is 196. The square nf the
fractional portion is 20. Added they make 2l6 ; which, divided by twice the other quantity 15, viz.
30, gives in the first place 6 ; and this, added to the divisor 30, makes 36; by which, in the second
place, the correct quotient comes out 6. This again is added to the correct divisor ; and the sum
is 42: which halved yields 21, the number sought. For the square of the number thus found is
T T 2
324 BRAHMEGUPTA. Chapter XII.
ji, 66. This is a portion only of the subject.* The rest will be delivered
under the construction of sines/ and under the pulverizer.^ [End of] chapter
twelfth [comprising] sixty-six couplets on addition, &c.
'441 : from which subtracting the square of the least number 1 96, the remainder is 245, the square*
of the greater number 15° 40'. Subtracting this square, the remainder is nought.
Or, adding the quotient 6 to the other quantity 15, the sum 21 is a number equal to the square-
root of the sum of the squares.
Example of the difference: The other quantity or greater number is 12° SO'. The least 10.
The square of this, 100. The square of the fractional portion is 20; which, subtracted, leaves 80.
This, divided by the other quantity doubled, 24, yields in the first place 4; which, subtracted from
the [first] divisor, leaves 20. The corrected quotient 4, subtracted from the corrected divisor 20,
affords the remainder 16, the half of which 8 is equal to the diflerence of squares.
Or, subtracting the quotient 4 from the other quantity 12, the residue 8 is a number equal to
the square root of the difference of squares. Thus, its square is 64; and so much is the difference
between the squares of the greater and least quantities l64t and 100. Cii.
' A portion only has been here shewn;^ and a portion only has been by us expounded. Else a
hundred volumes would be requisite under a single head. But we have undertaken to interpret
the whole astronomical course (sidd'hanta). Wherefore prolixity is to be shunned. Ch.
• Jyotpatti (jyd-utpatti) derivation of [semi-]chords: taught in the chapter on Spherics, and to
be there expounded (C. 21, § 15—21). Ch.
^ In the Chapter on the Pulveri2er (cuttac&'d'hy&ya) the author will treat the undsrmentioned
topics with other heads of computation: viz. Investigation of the pulvesizer (cMttaca). Algorithm
of symbols or colours ('rarnaj ; of affirmative and negative quantities d'lianarna) ; of surd roofs
(carani). Concurrence (sancramana). Dissimilar operation (lishama-carmanj.l Equation of
the unknown (avyacta-s&mya) . Equation of several unknown letters or colours (varnasdmya) .
Elimination of the middle term (mad'hyamii'haranaj. Equation involving products of unknown
quantities (bhdvica). Affected square (varga-pracriti), &cc. Cij.
• Nearly so. The exact square is 34o|; or in sexagesimals 245° 26' 40"..
t The exact square is 164^ ; in sexagesimals 164° 41' 40"..
i See Ch. 18, $25 and L«, 55—57.
CUTTACAD HYAYA, ON ALGEBRAj
THE EIGHTEENTH CHAPTER OF THE
BRAHME-SPHUTA-SIDD'HANTA,
BY BRAHMEGUPTA:
WITH NOTES SELECTED FROM THE COMMENTARY.
CHAPTER XVIII.
ALGEBRA.
SECTION I.
1. Since questions can scarcely be solved without the pulverizer,* there
fore I will propound the investigation of it together with problems.
2. By the pulverizer, cipher; negative and affirmative quantities, un-
known quantity, elimination of the middle term, colours [or symbols] and
factum, well understood, a man becomes a teacher among the learned, and
by the affected square.
3 — 6. Rule for investigation of the pulverizer: The divisor^ which yields
the greatest remainder, is divided by that which yields the least: the residue
is reciprocally divided ; and the quotients are severally set down one under
the other. The residue [of the reciprocal division] is multiplied by an
assumed number such, that the product having added to it the difference of
the remainders may be exactly divisible [by the residue's divisor]. That
' CiUtdcura, cut to, cuttaca, pulverizer. See Lil. §^248 and Vij-gad..^ 53.
326 BRAUMEGUPTA. Chapter XVIII.
s
multiplier is to be set down [underneath] and the quotient last. The penul-
timate is taken into the term next above it; and the product, added to the
ultimate term, is the agranta} This is divided by the divisor yielding least
remainder; and the residue, multiplied by the divisor yielding greatest
remainder and added to the greater remainder, is a remainder of [division by]
the product of the divisors. A twofold ^wo-a is a product of divisors:* and
the elapsed portion of the yuga is the remainder of the two. Thus may be
found the lapsed part of a yuga of three or more planets by the methotl of
the pulverizer.
7. Question 1. He, who 'finds the cycle (yuga) and so forth, for two,
three, four or more planets, from the respective elapsed cycles of the several
planets given, knows the method of the pulverizer.
Here, for facility's sake, the revolutions, &c. ofthesim and the rest are put,
as follows: the sun 30; the moon 400; Mars 16; Mercury 130; Jupiter 3;
Venus 50; Saturn 1 ; moon's apogee 4; moon's node 2; revolutions of stars
10990; solar months 360; lunar months 370; more months (lunar than solar)
10; solar days 10800; lunar days 1 1100; fewer days (terrestrial than lunar)
140; terrestrial days IO96O.
The days of the planetary cycles of the sun and the rest are [sun] IO96;
moon 137; Mars 685; Mercury and Venus IO96; Jupiter IO96O; Saturn
IO96O; apogee 2740; node5480.'
Example (a popular one is here proposed): What number, divided by six,
has a remnant of five; and divided by five, a residue of four; and by four, a
remainder of three; and by three, one of two?
Statement: 5 4 3 2 [Answer 59.]*
6 5 4 3
' Agr&nta. The proper import of the term, as it is here used, is unexplained.
* This is introduced in contemplation of instances relative to planets: and so is what follows.
Com.
OD^ 5 K-f "h J'sJ's
' Periodical revolu- 7 Apogee. Noda
tions in least terms: j 3 5 113 35 1 1 1
da°s'In°^'st terms •"*' [ ^^^^ "^ ^^^ ^^^^ ^°^^" ^°^^ ^^^^^ ^'^'^ ^^^^
* The divisor vrhich yields the greater remainder, namely 6, being divided by that which yields
Section I. PULVERIZER. 327
8. Rule for deducing elapsed time from residue of revolutions, &c. § 7-
Let residue of revolutions or the like, divided by the divisor, be a remainder;
the less, viz. 5, the residue is ^. Then, reciprocal division taking place, the quantity beneath is in
the first instance to be divided by that which stands above it : and thus the quotient is 5 and the
residue f . This is multiplied by a quantity so assumed as that the product having the difference
of the remainders (namely 1) added to it, may be exactly divisible by the [residue's] own divisor 1.
The quotient being solitary, the difference of remainders is in this case to be subtracted [§ 13].
The number so assumed is put 1. By that the residue being multiplied, isO; which, having sub-
tracted from it the difference of remainders I, makes 1 ; and this divided by the [residue's] own
divisor, namely 1, yields for quotient negative unity. Statement of the first quotient and the mul-
tiplier and present quotient 5 By the penultimate 1 multiplying the term next above it 5, the
1
i
product is 5 ; which added to the ultimate 1, makes 4. The agrdnta thus comes out 4. Divided
by the divisor yielding least remainder, viz. 5, the residue is 4: which, multiplied by the divisor
yielding greatest remainder 6, produces 24; and this, added to the greater remainders, affords the
remainder, 29, of the product of the divisors : that is to say, so much, namely 29, is the remainder
of the number in question (which divided by six has a remnant of five, and divided by five a residue
of four,) divided by a divisor equal to the product of the divisors, viz. 30.
Again, statement of the foregoing result with the third term 29 3 Here the divisor yielding
30 4
the greater remainder, 30, being divided by that which yields the less, viz. 4, the residue is f .
Then by reciprocal division the quotient is 2 and the residue f . This, multiplied by an assumed
multiplier seven, produces 0; which, having subtracted the difference of remainders 26, makes 26";
and divided by the [residue's] own divisor 2, the quotient is 13. Statement of the former quotient,
the multiplier and the [present] quotient 2 Proceeding by the rule (the penult taken into the
7
13
term next above it, &c. § 5), the agrunta comes out 1. This being divided by the divisor yielding
least remainder, the residue is 1 ; which, multiplied by the divisor yielding greatest remainder 30,
is 30, and added to the greater remainder 29, makes 59, the remainder answering to the product
of the divisors, viz. 60.
Wherever abridgment of the divisors [by a common measure] is practicable, the product of divi-
sors must be understood as equal to the product of the divisor yielding greatest remainder and
quotient of the divisor yielding least, abridged \i. e. divided] by the common measure : and when
one divisor is exactly divisible by the other, the greater remainder is the remainder required, and
the divisor yielding greatest remainder is taken for product of divisors. This is to be elucidated by
the intelligent mathematician, by assumption of several colours (or symbols).
Again, this number 59, of itself answers to the condition that divided by three, it shall have a
residue of two.
Example of Question 1. Elapsed part of the cycles of the sun, &c. together with the divisors,
as follows :
328 BR AHME GUPTA. Chapter XVIII.
Sun. Moon. Mars. Mercury. Jupiter. Venus. Saturn. Apogee B . Node D .
1000 41 315 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
1096 137 685 1096 10960 1096 10960 2740 5480
Here the divisor yielding greatest remainder, IO96, is exactly measured by that which )nelds least
137 : wherefore the remainder is the same, and the same [divisor] is taken for the product of divi-
sors; 1000
1096
The sequel of the rule " A two-fold yuga is a product of divisors" (§ 6) is next expounded: so
many days, as suffice for the commencement of exceeding months and deficient days, and the ter-
mination of the sun and moon's revolutions, to take place again on the first of Chaitra, light fortnight,
at sunrise at Lancd, are days of a two-fold cycle ; and this is what is termed a two-fold yuga. The
remainder, as found, is the elapsed portion of a two-fold yuga. In like manner are to be understood
three-fold cycles and so ibrth.
Again, statement of the same with the residue and divisor of Mars : 1000 315 Here the divi-
1096 685
sor yielding greatest remainder, IO96, is divided by the divisor yielding least, namely 685 ; and the
residue is |^. Then the quotients resulting from reciprocal division are put one under the other
1 and the residue is -j^; which, multiplied by an arbitrary multiplier three,* makes 0; and this
1
2
lessened by the subtraction of the difference of remainders, viz. 685, and divided by its own divisor
137, yields the quotient 5. The multiplier and quotient, thus found, are put below the former
quotients, one under the other : and that being done, a series is obtained 1 Proceeding as before,
1
3
3
5
the agr&nta comes out 5. This being divided by the divisor yielding least remainder, 685, the
residue which results is 5 ; which, multiplied by the divisor yielding greatest remainder and having
the greater remainder added, brings out the remainder 6480. It is the elapsed portion of a three-
fold yvga. The divisor yielding greatest remainder IO96, being multiplied by 5 the quotient of the
divisor yielding least remainder abridged by the common measure 137, produces the three-fold
yuga, 5480. But it is not fit, that the elapsed portion of a cycle should exceed the cycle : it is
therefore abridged by ihnyuga; and the residue must be considered as the elapsed portion of a
yuga. This being done, there results 1000 Next statement of the same with the elapsed portion
5480
of Mercury's ^^Kga .• 1000 1000 Here either divisor at choice may be taken as the one yieldi.ig
5480 1096
greatest remainder. Put 5480. The elapsed portion of the four-fold yuga is 1000. In like man-
ner, by the operation of the pulverizer with the respective elapsed portions of yugas of Jupiter, ■»
Venus and Saturn, the elapsed portions of cycles come out [Jupiter] 1000, Venus 1000 and Sa-
turn 1000; and the measure of the cycles as follows: viz. five-fold yuga IO96O; six-fold yuga
IO96O; seven-fold yi/g:a IO96O. In like manner the process of the pulverizer being observed with
the elapsed periods of the yugas of the moon's apogee and node, the elapsed portion of the entire
cycle for all the planets comes out 1000, and the value of such entire yuga IO960.
* Sic : sed qncre.
Section 1. PULVERIZER. 329
as also cipher divided by residue arising for one day.* The remainder de-
duced from these, being divided by residue of revohitions or the hke as arising
for one day,' is the number of [elapsed] days.
9. Question 2. He, who deduces the number of [elapsed] days from the
residue of revolutions, signs, degrees, minutes, or seconds declared at choice,
is acquainted with the method of the pulverizer.
Example: When the remainder of solar revolutions is eight thousand and
eighty, tell the elapsed portion of the cafpas, if thou have skill in the pulve-
rizer.
Statement: Residue of revolutions 8080.* [Answer: 1000.]
The foregoing rule (§ 3) for dividing the divisor which yields the greater remainder by that which
yields the less, is unrestrictive ; and the process may therefore be conducted likewise by dividing the
divisor which yields the less remainder by that which yields the greater.
Example: What number, divided by seventy-three, has a remnant of eight ; and divided by thir-
teen, a remainder of three?
Statement: 8 3 Dividing the divisor which yields the less remainder by that which affords
73 13
the greater, and the residue being reciprocally divided, the quotients are 5 The residue J.
1
1
1
1
Assumed multiplier 1. Difference of remainders 5. Here, since the process was inverted, the
difference of remainders is made negative, 5; and, as the quotients are uneven, it again becomes
affirmative, 5 : consequently it is additive. Proceeding as before, the agrdnta comes out TQ. This
is divided by the divisor yielding the greater remainder; and the residue 6, multiplied by the divi-
sor yielding the less remainder, 13, makes 78; and, added to the less remainder 3, brings out the
quantity sought 81.
' By the daily increment of it.
* This divided by terrestrial days, and both solar revolutions and terrestrial days abridged by the
common measure 10, must be put for a remainder, -f^fig. Then cipher divided by residue of solar
revolutions arising on one day, namely 3, is put for the [other] remainder, f. Proceeding by the
rule (§ 3) the series is 3* Whence, by the subsequent rule (§ 5), the remainder comes out 3000;
270
808
and this, divided by residue of revolutions arising for one day, 3, gives the number of [elapsed]
days 1000. In like manner, from the residue of signs and so forth, the number of [elapsed days] is
to be found.
• Sic MS.
3S0 BRAHMEGUPTA. Chapter XVIII.
10. Rule for finding elapsed time from given residue for hours: § 8.
From the result, which is derived from residues of revolutions or the like for
one day, and for the proposed hours or minutes, both reduced to like deno-
minators,' the number of [elapsed] days and so forth may be deduced.
Example : To what number of [elapsed] days does that amount of hours
correspond, for which the residue of lunar revolutions arising is four thousand
one hundred and five?
Statement: Residueofrevolutions, with divisor, -*-i-2-f. Residue as arising
for a single day, with divisor, ^-fy. The divisor is multiplied by sixty; and
thus both terms have like denominators. Cipher divided by the residue of
revolutions for one day must be put as a remainder, f. Thus the statement
is *^°g f. Statement of the same abridged by five, -^^jV f . Proceeding
as before, the remainder is 821. This, divided by the remainder [of revolu-
tions] for an hour, namely 1, gives the elapsed time in hours, 821; which,
divided by sixty, yields quotient, days 13, hours 41. Or, with an additive in
hours equal to the same divisor 1(544, the elapsed time in hours is 2465 or
4109.
1 1—13. Rules for a constant pulverizer: § 9 — 1 1.* The multiplier and
divisor being mutually divided, these quantities divided by the residue are
[in least terms, being] irreducible by any [further common] divisor.' The
quotients of these reciprocally divided are to be set down one under the other.
Tlie residue is multiplied by a multiplier chosen such that the product less
one* may be exactly divisible. That multiplier is to be set down; and the
• That is, when the proposed residue of revolutions is calculated for elapsed time reduced to
houis and minutes, then the residue of revolutions, &c. for one day must have its divisor multi-
plied by sixty or by three thousand six hundred; and thus the denominators are alike. Com.
• St'hira-cuttaca ; drfftha-cuttaca; the steady residue, by which the given remnant of revolu-
tions or the like is to be multiplied; and the product being divided by the divisor, the quotient is
elapsed time. — Com. From sfhira, steady; and drM'ha, firm. DriiCha, which the commentator
makes equivalent to st'hira in the compound terra designating this multiplier, is by Biia'scara em-
ployed in the sense for which Brahmegupta employs nich'heda, &c. See Lil. § 248.
* NicA'hida, nirapavarta ; having no divisor; no further common measure: reduced to least
terms. See LU. § 24.8.
* It is so, if the quotients be even : but, if they be odd, one must be added instead of subtracted.
Com. See § 13.
Section I. PULVERIZER. 331
quotient at the end: from which the agranta, being found by multiplying
the next superior term by the penultimate and adihng the ultimate to the
product, is divided by the divisor in least terms. The residue of this division
is the constant pulverizer.*
14. Question 3. To deduce the number of da3's from the residue of re-
volutions, &c. of the sun, and the rest; tell a constant pulverizer, thou skilful
mathematician who hast traveised the ocean of the pulverizer.
Here to find a constant pulverizer from a residue of revolutions of the sun,
the statement of revolutions and terrestiial days is 30 These are multi-
logdo
plier and divisor. Statement of them abridged bv ten: 3 The quotient
1096
of these mutually divided is 365, and remainder ■^. Multiplied by an assumed
multiplier, namely 2, the product is 2; to which one is added, since the quo-
tient is an odd number [§ 13]; and the sum divided by the divisor gives the
quotient 1 ; and the multiplier and quotient being set under the former quo-
tient, the series is 365 Proceeding by the rule (§5) the agranta is deduced
2
1
73 1 : from which divided by the divisor in least terms, the residue or constant
pulverizer is 731 for a residue of revolutions.
' When a constant pulverizer is sought, to deduce elapsed time from remainder of revolutions,
then revolutions of the planet are multiplier, and terrestrial days divisor. When it is so to deduce
the time from remainder of signs; twelve times the revolutions are multiplier, and terrestrial days
divisor. When it is investigated to conclude the time from residue of degrees; three hundred and
sixty times the revolutions are multiplier, and terrestrial days divisor. When it is so to conclude
the time from residue of minutes, &c. sixty times the foregoing multiple of revolutions are multi-
plier, and terrestrial days everywhere divisor. The multiplier and divisor, which are thus put to
find the constant pulverizer, must be reciprocally divided, and by the residue remaining the same
multiplier and divisor being divided are irreducible [or in least terms]; that is, they can be no fur-
ther abridged by a common measure. The same irreducible multiplier and divisor are again mu-
tually divided until the residue in the dividend be unity. Set down the quotients one under the
other. Multiply the residual unity by a multiplier taken such that the product less one, (or, if the
quotients be odd, having one added) may be exactly divisible by the residue's own divisor. The
multiplier and the quotient of this operation are to be set down, in order, under the former quo-
tients. Then the agranta is to be computed from the bottom : by taking the penultimate into the
next superior term and adding the ultimate. The agr&nta so found is divided by the irreducible
divisor, and the residue is the constant pulverizer. Com.
U U 2
J5<2 BRAHMEGUPTA. Chapter XVIII.
Then the nuiltipher for a residue of signs is 36; and the ahridged divisor
1096. From which, as before, the constant pulverizer conies out 61.
Multipher for a residue of degrees 1080. Divisor IO96. From these, as
before, the constant pulverizer is found 68.
For residue of minutes, pulverizer 129- For residue of seconds, pulve-
rizer 9-
In like manner, the constant pulverizer for the moon and the rest must be
understood, as that for the sun.
15. Rule for finding elapsed time by constant pulverizers: § 12. The
given residue of revolutions, or the like, being multiplied by its pulverizer
and divided by its divisor, the residue which arises is the number of [past]
days; there being added a multiple of the divisor by elapsed [periods] in least
terms.*
Example: Thou who hast traversed the ocean of the pulverizer! tell the
number of elapsed days, when the remainder of degrees is four thousand and
four hundred.
Statement: This remainder of degrees 4400, being abridged by the com-
mon divisor 80, as before in the investigation of the constant pulverizer, is
reduced to 55: which, multiplietl by the constant pulverizer 68, becomes
3740. From this divided by the divisor reduced to least terms 137, the resi-
due which is deduced is the number of [elapsed] days 41. To find the
elapsed time intended by the question, this must have added to it a multiple
of the divisor by the periods gone by. In this case they are [supposed] seven,
and the divisor multiplied by that, 959, being added to the number as above
found 41, the number of [elapsed] days comes out 1000.
16. Rule special: § 13. So when the quotients are even. But if they be
odd, what is propounded as negative, becomes affirmative; or as positive, be-
' Gata-nirapavarta : the quotient, which is obtained when the elapsed time from the beginning of
the yvga is divided by the divisor reduced to least terms, is thus denominated. The divisor, multi-
plied by that, being added to the elapsed time found by the rule, the sum is the elapsed portion of
the 1/uga. Com.
Section I. PULVERIZER. 333
comes negative :^ and the signs, negative or affirmative, of multiplicand and
additive, must be revcrsed."
17- Rule of inverse operation : <§ 14. Multiplier must be made divisor;
and divisor, multiplier; positive, negative; and negative, positive: root [is to
be put] for square; and square, for root: and first as converse for last.
18. Question 4. The residue of degrees of the sun less three, being
divided by seven, and the square-root of the quotient extracted, and the root
less eight being multiplied by nine, and to the product one being added, the
amount is a hundred. When does this take place on a Wednesday?
Statement: 3— Div. 7— Root— 8— Mult. 9— Add. 1— Giv. 100. The af-
firmative unity being made negative, when applied to a hundred, the result
is 99. Nine, which was multiplier, becomes divisor. Dividing by that, the
quotient is 11. Negative eight becomes affirmative : whence 19. The ex-
traction of the root is converted into the raising of the square 361. The
.divisor seven becomes multiplier. Product 2527- The negative three be-
ycomes affirmative, and is added, 2530. This is residue of degrees; from
which, the number of [elapsed] days is to be sought; until, with addition of
the divisor, it come to Wednesday.
19. Question 5. He, who tells when a given residue of revolutions of
the sun occurs on a Monday, or on a Thursday, or on a Wednesday, has
knowledge of the pulverizer.
20. Question 6. A person, who can say when a residue of degrees or of
seconds, which occurs on a Wednesday, will do so on a Monday, is conver-
sant with the pulverizer.
2 1 . Question 7. One, who tells when given positions of the planets,
■ See preceding instances of the application of this first part of the rule, under Example 1st, or
under Problem 3 and Rule 10.
^ If the multiplicand were negative, it must be made positive; and the additive must be made
negative: and then the pulverizer is to be sought. Com.
334 BRAKMEGUPTA. Chapter XVIII.
which occur on certain lunar days, or on days of other denomination of mea-
sure,' will recur on a given day of the week, is versed in the pulverizer.
22. Rule 15: The number of [elapsed] days, deduced from the given re-
sidue of revolutions or the like by means of the pulverizer, receives an addi-
tion of days of a period in least terms, repeatedly, until the intended day of
the week be reached.
23. Question 8. He, who tells the number of [elapsed] days, seeing the
degrees, &c. of a given [planet's] mean [place], or does so from a conjunction
of two or more planets, or from their difference, is conversant with the pul-
veiizer.
24 — 25. Rule 1 6 — 17: The divisor in least terms, being multiplied by
the minutes, &c. in the [given] signs, &c. and divided by the minutes in a
revolution, the quotient is the residue of revolutions: whence the number of
[elapsed] days [may be deduced]. In like manner residues of signs, degrees,
minutes and seconds, are found, and the number of [elapsed] days as before.
Putting arbitrary numbers in places deficient, proceed with the rest of the
process as directed.*
Example: Seeing past signs, degrees and minutes of Jupiter, nought,
twenty -two and thirty, a person, who tells the number of [elapsed] days at
that instant, is one conversant with the pulverizer.
Statement: Its minutes 1350, multiplied by Jupiter's divisor in least
22
30
terms IO96O, and divided by the minutes of a circle; the quotient is the
' As solar, or siderial, &c. — Com.
'^ The place of a planet in signs, &c. being refhiced to degrees, minutes, and so forth, the num-
ber of minutes is multiplied by the particular divisor in least terms, and divided by the minutes of
a circle ; and the quotient is the remainder of revolutions. If it be the number of degrees, &c. the
quotient is then remainder of signs. If it be so of minutes, &c. the quotient is remainder of de-
grees. From these residues, the number of [elapsed] days is found as before. There is this
difference: when (degrees being divided by the minutes of a circle) any residue arises, it is to be
rejected : the quotient is taken.
1
Section I. PULVERIZER. 335
residue of revolutions 685. Whence the number of [elapsed] days, as before,
comes ou : 7535.
Example: When Jupiter and the lunar node are conjunct having passed
signs, degrees and minutes, three, twenty-two and thirty; tell me the num-
ber of [elapsed] days.
Conjunction of Jupiter and the node 3 Reduced to minutes, multi-
2,2
30
plied by terrestrial days, and divided by minutes of a circle, the quotient is
the sum of residues of revolutions 3425. Whence, as before, the number of
[elapsed] days is deduced 685.
Example : Tell me the number of days elapsed on a day when the body
of the sun, less the conjunction of Jupiter and the lunar node, is just so much.
Statement: 3 £2 30. Hence, as before, the residue of degrees of the
sun, less the residue of revolutions of Jupiter and the lunar node, is found
3425. Whence the number of [elapsed] days, by the rule § 7, comes out
137-
Example :' Signs and degrees of Jupiter have been effaced by the boy
with his finger. Thirty minutes are seen : from which tell me, astrologer,
the signs, degrees, and number of days, if thou have practice of the pul-
verizer.
Statement : Here put unity in the place of signs ; and in that of de-
30
grees, ten. See: 1 Hence the residue of revolutions is deduced 1233:
10
10
from which the number of days, as before, comes out 411.
26. Question Q. From the residue of signs, degrees, minutes or seconds,
told, or if lost assumed, he who finds the superior and intermediate terms, is
a person conversant with the pulverizer.
' A stanza and a half.
336 BRAHMEGUPTA. Chapter XVIII.
27. Rule 18. Tlie multiplier, by which the divisor being multiplied,
and having the residue added to the product, becomes exactly divisible, is
the [portion of orbit] past. The quotient is the residue. In like manner
from the residue, [the place of J the planet and the number of [elapsed] days
are [deduced].
Example : From the residue of seconds of the moon being eight hundred,
tell the [place of the] moon and number of [elapsed] days, my friend who
hast traversed the ocean of the pulverizer.
Statement: Residue of seconds 800. This, abridged by the common
measure eighty, becomes 10. Making this additive ; divisor in least terms,
137, dividend ; and the multiplier, which serves to bring out seconds, namely
sixty, the divisor; the statement is Dividend 137 * j i-^- . ,^ Here, by
Divisor 60 '^ ' '^^ "
reciprocal division the the quotients are Residue a. This is multiplied
S
3
1
1
by a multiplier assumed such, that the product with one added may be ex-
actly divisible, since the residue of seconds is additive : but, as the quotients
are here uneven, one must be subtracted, [§ 13]. Such an assumed multi-
plier is nine; and the quotient 10. Hence, as before, the constant pulverizer
is deduced. This being multiplied by the residue of seconds, namely 10,
and divided by its divisor, viz. 60, the residue is the multiplier 10. So many
are the seconds. The dividend being multiplied by the multiplier, and
having the additive added, and being divided by sixty, the quotient is 23.
This is residue of minutes. Again, make this additive, days in least terms
dividend, and sixty divisor: See Dividend 137 a \ ]\- r oq Hence,
1 visor oO
proceeding as before, the multiplier is 41. So many are the minutes past.
The dividend being multiplied by the multiplier 41, having the additive
added, and being divided by sixty, the quotient is residue of degrees, 94.
Again, this is put additive, days in least terms dividend, and thirty di\isor.
See Dividend 137 A j/litive O-l Hence, as before, the multiplier comes
Divisor 30 ^ '
out 28. So many are the degrees. The dividend being multiplied by the
Section I. PULVERIZER. 337
multiplier, having the additive added, and being divided by thirty, the quo-
tient is the residue of signs 131. Make this again additive, days in least
■terms dividend, and twelve divisor; [Dividend 137 Allitivel^ll '^'^*^'
Divisor 12 '-' r
multiplier is found 5. So many are the signs past. The dividend being
multiplied by the multiplier, and having the additive 131 added, and being
divided by twelve, the quotient is the residue of revolutions, 68. Put days
in least terms for dividend, revolutions in least terms for divisor, and residue
of revolutions for additive. See: Dividend 137 \ ],]>• p fio Hence, as
Divisor 5
before, the multiplier comes out 1. This is the [number of] revolutions
past. The quotient is the number of [elapsed] days, 41.
From the same residue put as an assumed one, the number of [elapsed]
days, in like manner, comes out 41.
Here an arbitrary multiple of 137 is additive.
28. Question 10. He, who knows the elapsed [portion of a] 7/uga from
the residue of exceedmg months told, or assumed, or from the residue of
fewer days, or from the sum of them, is a person versed in the pulverizer.
Example: When the residue of e.t'ceei^^/wo" months is eight hundred and
eighty; and that o^ fewer days seven thousand seven hundred and twenty,
and the sum of these sixteen thousand two hundred; tell, from any one of
these, the elapsed [portion of the] yuga.
Residue of e.rceeJ/wg- months 8480. Residue of ^/e^c/ew? days 7720. Sum
16200.
The remainder, which is found by the rule § 7, [being divided by] residue
of exceeding months arising for one day,' is the elapsed solar days of the yuga.
Proceeding in this manner, they come out 848.
Or else let exceeding months be the multiplier, and solar days be the divi-
sor, and the constant pulverizer be found by the rule § 9- Residue of ex-
ceeding months is to be multiplied by tliat. Then divide the product by the
particular divisor. The residue is solar days.
In like manner, from the residue of deficient days, the elapsed lunar days
of the yuga are found 293.
' Daily increment of the difference between lunar and solar months.
X X
338 BRAHMEGUPTA. Chapter XVIII.
From the sum of the residues of more months and fewer days, as arising
for one day,' and from the sum of tlie residues of more months and fewer
days, as proposed, and reduced to lunar days, proceeding by the rule \ 12, tl)e
lunar days are to be found 108.
29. Question 11. When does the square-root of three less than residue
of exceeding months, being increased by two, and then divided and lessened
by two, and squared, and augmented by nine, amount to ninety?
30. Question 12. When does the square of deficient days, being lessened
by one, and divided by twenty, and augmented by two, and multiplied by
eight, and divided by ten, and increased by two, amount to eighteen?
Here proceeding by the rule of inverse process as before taught, the resi-
dues of more months and fewer days come out 4099 and I9.
' Daily increment of the difference between lunar and terrestrial days.
I
( 339 )
SECTION II.
ALGORITHM.'
lb
31. Rule for addition of affirmative and negative quantities and cipher:
§ 19. The sum of two affirmative quantities is affinnative; of two negative
is negative; of an affirmative and a negative is their difference; or, if they
be equal, nought. The sum of cipher and negative is negative; of affirma-
tive and nought is positive; of two ciphers is cipher.
32 — 33. Rule for subtraction : §20 — 21. The less is to be taken from
the greater, positive from positive; negative from negative. When the
ffreater, however, is subtracted from the less, the difference is reversed.
Negative, taken from cipher, becomes positive; and affirmative, becomes ne-
gative. Negative, less cipher, is negative; positive, is positive; cipher,
nought. When affirmative is to be subtracted from negative, and negative
from affirmative, they must be thrown together.
34. Rule for multiplication : § 22. The product of a negative quantity
and an affirmative is negative; of two negative, is positive; of two affirma-
tive, is affirmative. The product of cipher and negative, or of cipher and
affirmative, is nought; of two ciphers, is cipher.
35 — 36. Rule for division: §23 — 24. Positive, divided by positive, or
negative by negative, is affmnative. Cipher, divided by cipher, is nought.
Positive, divided by negative, is negative. Negative, divided by affirmative,
' Shcd-trmsat-paricarman. Thirty-six operations or Qiodes of process. See Arithm. § 1. Vij-'
gem. H 3.
X X 2
340 BRAIIMEGUPTA. Chapter XVIII.
is negative. Positive, or negative, divided by cipher, is a fraction with that
for denominator:* or cipher divided by negative or affirmative.'
[36 Concluded.] Rule for involution and evolution: § 24.. The square
of negative or affirmative is positive; of cipher, is cipher. The root of a
square is such as was that from which it was [raised].'
37. Rule of concurrence and dissimilar operation: §25. The sum, with
difference added and subtracted, being divided by two, is concuiTcnce. The
difference of squares divided by [simple] diflt'erence, having difference added
and subtracted and being then divided by two, is dissimilar operation.*
38. Rule for the construction of a rectangular figure with rational sides:
§ 26. Be a surd the perpendicular. Its square, divided by an assumed num-
ber, has the arbitrary quantity added and subtracted. The least is the base:
and half the greater number is the flank.^ Those [surds'], the product
whereof is a square, are to be abridged.
• 39. Rule for addition and subtraction of surds: §27- The surds being
divided by a quantity assumed, and the square-roots of the quotients being
extracted, the square of the sum of the roots, being divided by the assumed
quantity, [is the sum,] or the square of their difference, [so divided, is the
difference of the surds].
■ Tach-ch'Mda, having that for denominator : having, in this instance, cipher for denominator,
to a finite quantity for numerator. See Vij.-gan. § l6.
■ * Is in like manner expressed by a fraction having a finite denominator to a cipher for nurae-
Tator.
^ The root is to be taken either negative or affirmative, as best answers for the further operations.
Com.
♦ Vishama-carman. See Lil. § 57.
' Let the perpendicular be put an irrational number 8 ; and let the assumed number be 4.
Hence the figure is constructed
12
' Surd is understood from the preceding sentence. Those irrationab are to be abridged, the
product of pairs of which is a square. Com.
Section II. LOGISTICS. 341
Example : Tell the sum and difference of surds two and eight, and three
and twenty-seven, respectively.
Statement: c2 c8. These surds, divided by an assumed number 2, give
I and 4; the roots whereof 1 and 2. The squares of their sum and difference
are 9 and 1; which, multiplied by the assumed number, become 18 and 2,
the sum and difference of the surds,
Statement of the second Example: c3 c27. Proceeding as above, the
sum and difference are found 48 and 12.
[39 Concluded.] Rule of multiplication : § 27- The multiplicand is put
level with the [terms of the] multiplicator [placed] across, one under the
other; and their products are added together.
Example :* The multiplicator comprises the surds two, three and eight ;
and the multiplicand, three with the rational number five. Tell the product
quickly. Or let the multiplicator consist of the surds three and twelve less
the rational number five.
Statement: Multiplicator c 2 c3 c8. Multiplicand c 3 ru5.
Here multiplicand is placed level with the terms of the multiplicator
across, one under the other:
Multiplier. Multiplicand. Product.
c2 c 3 ru5 c 6 c 50
c3 c3 ru5 c 9 c 75
c8 c5 ru5 c 2,4, c 200
Summing the products as directed by the rule, the answer comes out
ru 3 c 450 c 75 c 54.
i
Statement of the second Example : Multiplicand c3 ru5. Multiplier
c 3 c 12 ru5.
Proceeding as before, the result of multiplication is rw l6 c 300.
40. Rule of division of surds: § 28. The dividend and divisor are mul-
' End of one couplet and beginning of another.
342 BRAHMEGUPTA. Chapter XVIII.
tiplicd by the divisor witli a selected [term] made negative;* and are seve-
rally summed : more than once [if occasion there be]. The dividend is then
divided by the divisor reduced to a single term.
Statement of the foregoing result of multiplication as dividend, and its
multiplier as divisor, for division : ru 3 c 450 c 75 c 54.
cl8* c3
Put cl8 c3. The dividend and divisor, multiplied by this, make
ru75 c625. The dividend being then divided by the single surd consti-
ru 15
tuting the divisor, the quotient is rw 5 c 3.
Statement of the second Example : ru 16 c 300 Here putting the surd
c27 c 25
twenty-seven negative, and proceeding as before, the answer comes out
ru 5 c 3.
[40 Concluded.] Rule of involution : §28. A square is the product of
two like quantities.
Example : Tell the square of the surds six, five, two and three.
Statement: c6 c5 c2 c3. Answer: rw 16 c 120 c 72 c 60 c 48
c40 c24.
41. Rule of evolution : §29. From the square of the absolute number
take surds' selected at choice. The square-root of the difference being
added to and subtracted from the absolute number, the moieties are treated,
the first as an absolute number, the second as a [radical] surd exclusive of
the rest. More than once.*
Example : The square as above found stated for extraction of the root :
ru 16 c 120 c 72 c 60 c 48 c 40 c ^4.
' That is to say, among the surd terms, which compose the surd divisor, one is selected which
though affirmative is to be put negative. Com.
• Sum of c 2 and c 8.
* One, two or more surd terms. '■> '^'•'' '"^ Com.
♦ Repeat the operation so long as there remain surd terms of the square. Com.
Section II.
LOGISTICS.
343
Subtract the three surds c 120 c7'I c48 from the square of the absolute
number 256. Remainder \6. Its root 4. Added to and subtracted from
the rational number, and halved, it gives 10 and 6 as two surd terms. The
first is treated as rational; and the second as a radical surd. Again, sub-
tracting two surd terms 60 and 24 from the square of the rational 100, the
difference is l6; of which the square-root is 4; and the moieties of the sum
and difference are 7 and 3. The first is here treated as absolute; and the
second as a radical surd. Again, subtracting the surd 40 from the square of
the absolute 49, the remainder is 9, of which the square-root is 3; and the
moieties of sum and difference are 5 and 2.
Statement of the radical surds in order aS'<^ound : c6 c 5 c 3 c Q.
42. Rule of addition and subtraction of unknown quantities, and their
squares, &c. § 30. The sum and difference of like terms, whether unknown
quantities, or squares, cubes, biquadrates, fifth, sixth, &c. powers,' are taken;
but if dissimilar are severally stated. -i;
43. Rule of multiplication, &c. §31. The product of two like quanti-
ties is a square; of three or more, is the power of that designation.* The
product of dissimilar quantities, the symbols being mutually multiplied, is z^
factum.^ The rest is as before.
' Pancha-gata, fifth power; shad-gata, sixth power, &c. Literally ' arrived at the fifth, &c.
[degree] '.
* Tad-gat a, Tailed to thit. ^.
' Bhivitaca, OT bhdvita. See V'lj.-gan, Sil. ] ,9iol
C 344 ) .oiroi"^-
SECTION III.
r
SIMPLE EQUATION.
-)(44. Rule for a simple equation :* § 32. The difference of absolute num-
bers, inverted and divided by the difference of the unknown, is the [value of
the] unknown in an equation.*
45. Question 13. If four times the twelfth part of one more than the
remainder of degrees, being augmented by eight, be equal to the remainder %
of degrees with one added thereto, tell the elapsed days.
Here remainder of degrees is put yavat-tavat : viz. ya 1. With one
added, it is ya \ ru \. Its twelfth part is ya \ ru \ This quadrupled is |
\^
ya \ ru \ Augmented by eight absolute, it is ya 1 ru 25 It is equal to ^
3 ' 1 nj o
remainder of degrees with one added thereto. Statement of both sides
tripled, ya 1 ru 25 The difference of [terms of the] unknown is ya 2. By
ya 3 ru 3
this the difference of absolute number, namely 22, being divided, yields the i
residue of degrees of the sun 1 1 . This residue of degrees must be under-
stood to be in least terms. The elapsed days are to be hence deduced, as be-
fore, (§7). . • ''
' The four methods of analysis (vija-chatushtaya) are next explained ; and in the first place
equatjcn of a single colour. Com. ^
* The value of the unknown quantity, in the example, as proposed by the question, is to be put
ydvat-tuvat ; and, upon that, performing multiplicatiou, division, and other operations as requisite }
in the instance, two sides are to be carefully made equal. The equation being framed, the rule
takes effect. Subtract the [term of the] unknown in the first of those two equal sides from the un-
known of the second. The remainder is termed difference of the unknown. The absolute number
on the other side is to be subtracted from the absolute number on the first side : and the residue is
termed difference of the absolute. The residue of the absolute, divided by the remainder of the
unknown, is the value of the unknown. Com.
I
Section III. SIMPLE EQUATION. 345
46. Question 14. When the residue of exceeding months, less two,
being divided by three, having seven added to the quotient, and then mul-
tipHed by two, is equal to the residue of exceeding months, tell the elapsed
days.
Remainder of exceeding months ya 1. Proceeding with this as said, there
results ya 1 ru 38. This is equal to the remainder of exceeding months
3
ya \. Statement of both sides of equation tripled 3/« 2 rw 38 By the fore-
ya 3 ru
going rule (§ 32) the answer comes out, residue of exceeding mouths, 38.
It must be understood to be in least terms; and from it elapsed time is to be
deduced as before.
47. Question 15. If the residue of deficient days, less one, being divided
by six and having three added to the quotient, be equal to the residue of
deficient days divided by five, tell the elapsed period.
Here the remainder of deficient days is put ya 1 ; from which, as before,
results j/a 1 ru 17. It is equal to remainder of deficient days divided by five,
6
ya J-. The two sides of equation being reduced to a common denomination
and the denominator dropped, the statement is ya 5 ru 85 Hence, as bc-
ya 6 ru
fore, the residue of deficient days is found 85 ; from which elapsed days arc
/deduced as before.
V y
( 346 )
SECTION IV.
<IUADRATIC EQUATION.
48.' Rule for elimination of the middle term :* § 32, 33. Take absolute
number from the side opposite to that from which the square and simple un-
known are to be subtracted. To the absolute number multiplied by four
times the [coefficient of the] square, add the square of the [coefficient of the]
middle term ; the square root of the same, less the [coefficient of the] middle
term, being divided by twice the [coefficient of the] square, is the [value of
the] middle term.'
49. Question 16. When does the residue of revolutions of the sun, less
one, fall, on a Wednesday, equal to the square root of two less than the resi-
due of revolutions, less one, multiplied by ten and augmented by two?
The value of residue of revolutions is to be here put square of ydvat-tdvat
with two added : i/av 1 rM 2 is the residue of revolutions. This less two is
ya V I ; the square root of which is i/a 1. Less one, it is i/a \ ru ] ; which
multiplied by ten is ya 10 ru 10; and augmented by two ya 10 ru 8. It is
equal to the residue of revolutions i/a v \ ru Q less one: viz. ya v 1 ru I.
Statement of both sides ^^a v ya ]0 rw 8 Equal subtraction being made
ya V \ ya ru 1
* Remaining half of a couplet and one whole one.
^ Mad'hyam&harana. See Vy.-gan. Ch. 1.
■ An equation of two sides being framed conformably to the enunciation of the instance, if there
be a square or other [power] together with the unknown, then this rule takes effect. Subtract the
absolute number from the side other than that from which the square and the unknown qualities
are subtracted. Then equal subtraction having been so made, the numeral (anca) which belongs to
the square of the unknown, is termed [coefficient of the] square; and that, which appertains to the
unknown, is called [coefficient of the] middle term. The absolute number, which is on the second
side, being multiplied by four times the square [i. e. its coefficient] and added to the square of the
middle term [i. e. of its coefficient], the square-root of the sum, less the middle term [i. c. its co-
efficient], divided by the double of the square as it is termed [i. e. coefficient], is the middle term ;
that is to say, it is the value of the unknown. Com.
SectionIV. quadratic equation. 347
conformably to rule (§ 32) there arises ru 9 Now, from the abso-
yax) \ ya 10
lute number (9), multiplied by four times the [coefficient of the] square (36),
and added to (100) the square of the [coefficient of the] middle term, (making
consequently 64), the square root being extracted (8), and lessened by the
[coefficient of the] middle term (10), the remainder 18 divided by twice the
[coefficient of the] square (2), yields the value of the middle term 9. Sub-
stituting with this in the expression put for the residue of revolutions, the
answer comes out, residue of revolutions of the sun 83. Elapsed period
of days deduced from this, 393, must have the denominator in least terms
added so often until it fall on Wednesday.
50. Or another Rule: § 34. To the absolute number multiplied by the
[coefficient of the] square, add the square of half the [coefficient of the] un-
known, the square root of the sum, less half the [coefficient of the] unknown,
being divided by the [coefficient of the] square, is the unknown.
In the foregoing example, equal subtraction being made from the two
sides, the result was_ya v \ ya \iy Here absolute number (9) multiplied
by(l) the [coefficient of the] square (9), and added to the square of half the
[coefficient of the] middle term, namely, 25, makes l6 ; of which the square
root 4, less half the [coefficient of the] unknown (5), is 9; and divided by the
[coefficient of the] square ( 1 ) yields the value of the unknown 9 . S ubstituting
with this, the residue of revolutions comes out 83: whence elapsed days are
deduced, as before, 39^.
51. Question 17- When is the square of three less than the quarter of the
residue of exceeding months equal to the residue of exceeding months ? or
the like [function] of remainder of deficient days equal to remainder of defi-
cient days?
Remainder of exceeding months is here put ya 4. Its quarter less three is
ya \ ru 3; of which the square is ya v I ya 6 ru 9- It is equal to the re-
mainder of exceeding months. The process being performed as before, the
residue of exceeding months is found 4. Whence the elapsed period is de-
duced.
In like manner the remainder of deficient days likewise is 4: whence the
elapsed period comes out 1031.
Y Y 3
( 348 )
SECTION V.
EQUATION OF SEVERAL COLOURS.
52. Rule: § 35. Subtracting the colours other than the first from the
opposite side to that from which the first is subtracted, after reducing them
to a common denomination, the vakie of the first is derived from [the residue]
divided by this [coefficient of the] first. If more than one [value], two and
two must be opposed. The pulverizer is employed, if many [colours] re-
main.*
53. Question 18. He, who tells the number of [elapsed] days from the
number of days added to past revolutions, or to the residue of them, or to the
total of these, or from their sum, is a person versed in the pulverizer.
Example: The number of [elapsed] days together with past lunar revolu-
tions is given equal to one hundred and thirty-nine. Tell me the number of
days separately.
Here the number of [elapsed] days is put j/a 1. Multiplied by revolutions
* In an example in which there are two or more unknown quantities, two or more colours, a*
y&vat-t&vat, &c. must be put for their values : and upon those the requisite operations, conformably
to the instance, being wrought, two or more sides of equation are to be carefully framed : and
among them, taiten two and two, equal subtraction is to be made ; in this manner : the first colour
being subtracted from one side, subtract the rest of the colours reduced to a like denomination, and
absolute number, from the other side. The residue of another colour being divided by the residue
of the first, the quotient is a value of the first colour. If many such values be obtained, they must
be equated again in pairs reducing them to like denominators. But, that being done, if there be
two colours in the value of another colour which is thence deduced, the coefficients (anca) of those
two are reciprocally the values of such colours. But, if there be many colours in the value of
another colour, the pulverizer must be applied to them ; in this manner : excepting one colour,
substitute arbitrary values for the rest, and, adding them to absolute number, form the addition.
Make the coefficient of the selected colour, the dividend ; and the coefficient of the colour in the
denominator, the divisor. The multiplier, hence found by the method of the pulverizer, is the
value of the colour in the dividend ; and the quotient is the value of that in the divisor. Com.
Sect. V. EQUATION INVOLVING SEVERAL UNKNOWN. 349
of the moon in least terms, and divided by the divisor also reduced to the.
least terms, there results 3/ff -^-f-^; from which less the residue of revolutions,
divided by the divisor,' the quotient is the [complete] revolutions; where-
fore the residue of revolutions is put ca 1. Less that, and divided by the
divisor in least terms, it yields revolutions, ya 5 ca ] ; which, added to the
137
number of [elapsed] days, makes 3/rt 142 ca I. It is equal to the sum of
137
[complete] revolutions and immber of [elapsed] days, rw 139. Statement of both
sides of equation reduced to the same denominator, ^fl 142 ca \ r?< '^
ya ca i-u 19013
Subtraction being made as prescribed by the rule (§ 35), the result is
ca 1 ru 19043. Since there are several colours, the pulverizer nmst be
ya 142
employed. The coefficient of the colour in the dividend is dividend; that
which stands with the colour in the divisor, is divisor. From these the con-
stant pulverizer, as found by the rule (§ 9), is 141. Multiplying by this the
additive 19043, divide by the divisor 142, the residue is here the multiplier
sought, 127. It" is the value of cdlaca. The dividend being multiplied by
the multiplier, and having the additive added, and being divided by its divi-
sor, the quotient is the value of ydvat-tdvat, 135. It is the number of
[elapsed] days.
Example: When the residue of lunar revolutions, with the number of
[elapsed] days, is given equal to two hundred and sixty-two, tell me the
number of days.
The number of [elapsed] days is here put ya 1. This, multiplied by revo-
lutions and divided by the divisor, becomes j/a 5. Then cdlaca is put for the
value of quotient.'^ If the divisor multiplied by the quotient be subtracted
from the number of elapsed days multiplied by the [periodical] revolutions,
the residue which remains is the residue of revolutions. So doing, the result
' So the original: but the expression is not quite accurate, as the fraction is not again divided;
but the multiple of the time by periodical revolutions, less the residue, being divided, gives tiie
complete revolutions for quotient.
* Exclusive of the fractional residue.
350 BRAHMEGUPTA. Chapter XVIII.
isi/a5 ca 137. This, with the number of days, becomes 3/rt 6 ca \37. It
is equal to the sum of the number of days and residue of revolutions, 262.
Statement of both sides of equation i/a 6 ca 1 37 ru The process
ya ca I'u 26S
being followed as before, the multiplier comes out 4. It is the value of
cdlaca. The quotient is the value of ydvat-tdvat, 135. It is the number of
[elapsed] days.
Example : If the sum of the three specified articles be equal to two
hundred and sixty-six, tell me the number of [elapsed] days; or tell it from
the sum of the other two.
The specified articles are [complete] revolutions, the residue of them, and
the number of days. The number of days isputyal. This, multiplied by
revolutions and divided by the divisor, is i/a -^4^. The quotient' is ca 1.
Divisor multiplied by quotient, being subtracted from the number of
[elapsed] days taken into revolutions, the remainder is residue of revolutions,
ya 5 ca 137- Adding the number of days and the [past] revolutions, the
total is ya 6 ca 136. This is equal to the sum of the number of [elapsed]
days, the residue of revolutions and [past] revolutions, 266. Statement of
the two sides of equation, ya 6 ca 136 ru Hence, by equal sub-
ya ca ru 266
traction and other process, as before, the constant pulverizer comes out 2;
and the multiplier is found 4. It is the value of cdlaca; and is the [number
ofj past revolutions 4. The quotient is the value of ydvat-tdvat, 135. It
is the number of [elapsed] days. Subtracting the sum of [past] revolutions
and [elapsed] days from the sum total, the remainder is the residue of revolu-
tions, 127.
Example : When the residue of revolutions of the moon added to the re-
volutions past is equal to one hundred and thirty-one, tell me the number of
[elapsed] days.
Number of days 3/a 1. The residue of revolutions is found as before
ya 5 ca \ 37. This, added to past revolutions, is ya 5 ca 1 36. It is equal
to the sum of past revolutions and residue of revolutions, 131. The con-
stant pulverizer comes out 4. Hence the multiplier, 4. It is the value of
' Exclusive of the fractional residue.
Sect. V. EQUATION INVOLVING SEVERAL UNKNOWN. 351
calaca as before; and is the number of revolutions complete. The quotient
is the value o^ydvat-tdvat, 135. It is the number of [elapsed] days.
54. Question I9. He, who tells the number of [elapsed] days from the
number of days less the past revolutions, or less the residue of them, or less
the sum of these, or from their difference, is a person acquainted with the
pulverizer.
Example : The number of [elapsed] days, less the past lunar revolutions,
is given equal to one hundred and thirty-one ; tell me the number of days.
Here tiie value of the number of days h ya\; Avhich, being multiplied by
revolutions, and lessened by residue of revolutions, put equal to cdlaca, and
divided by its divisor, becomes the number of past revolutions, ya 5 ca \.
137
The number of days, less that, is ya \32 ca \ . It is equal to the difference
137
between the number of days and past revolutions, namely, 131. Statement
of the equation reduced to a common denominator, ya 1 32 ca \ ru
ya ca ru 1 7947
Equal subtraction being made, as before, the constant pulverizer comes out
133. The multiplier, value of cdlaca, 127- The quotient is the value of
ydvat-tdvat : it is the number of [elapsed] days, 1 35. The difference be-
tween the number of days and past revolutions, 131, being subtracted, the
remainder is the past revolutions, 4.
Example : [Elapsed days] less the residue of the [revolutions] being eight;
or less the sum of the [past revolutions and their residue] being four; or less
the difference of the two being a hundred and twenty-three: tell the num-
ber of [elapsed] days.
In the first example, the value of the number of [elapsed] days is put_y« 1.
As before, the residue of revolutions, ya 5 ca 137. Taking this from the
number of days, the remainder is ya 4 ca 137. It is made equal to eight;
and proceeding, as before, the multiplier or value of cdlaca is 4; and the
value of ydvat-tdvat, or number of [elapsed] days, 135.
In the second example, residue of revolutions, as before, ya 5 ca 1 37-
Past revolutions ca 1. Their sumj^a 5 ca 136. This, subtracted from the
352 BRAHMEGUPTA. Chapter XVllI.
number of clays, leaves j/fl 4 ca \ 36. It is equal to four. The result is
value o{ cdtaca, 4; and value oi' ydvat-tdrat, the number of days, 135.
In the third example, residue of revolutions, i/a 5 ca 137. Past revolu-
tions, ca 1. Difference ^a 5 ca 138. It is equal to one hundred and thirty-
three. The result is, value of cdlaca, 4: \a\uc of ydvat-tdvat, the number of
days, 135.
55. Question 20. He, who tells the elapsed [portion of the] cycle from
the signs, or the like;' or the residues of them; or from past exceeding
months; or J'ewer days; or their residues," is a person conversant with the
pulverizer.
' Example : Forty-six, a hundred and seventy-two, a hundred and seventy-
seven, and a hundred and thirty-six, are declared to be respectively the
amount of the number of [elapsed] days added to past signs ; or to the residue
of them; or to the sum of these two; or amount of the sum of the two: tell
me the number of days in the several instances.
Here the residue of lunar revolutions is, as before, j/a 5 ca 137. This,
multiplied by twelve, becomes ya 60 ca 1644. Subtracting from it, tlie
residue of signs denoted by nilaca, and dividing by the divisor, and adding
the number of [elapsed] days, the result \& ya 197 ca 16'44 ni \. It is equal
137
to forty-six. Statement of the two sides of equation reduced to a like
denomination, ya 197 ca 1644 ni 1 ru Equal subtraction being made,
ya ca ni ru 6302
the value of ydvat-tdvat is ca 1644 ni 1 ru 630!iJ. Here the arbitrary value
' Degrees, minutes, or seconds. Com.
* As four problems were proposed in the preceding passage, (Question 18,) so are four to be
here understood for finding the number of [elapsed] days from the number of days added to past
signs; or added to the residue of them; or to the total of these [signs and residue]; or from the
sura of these two. And, as four problems were proposed in the foregoing passage, (Question 19,)
so are four to be inferred for finding the same from the number of days, less the past signs, and so
forth. Thus the problems are eight. In like manner, from past degrees and their residue; from
past minutes and their residue ; from past seconds and their residue ; eight problems, in each in-
stance, are to be deduced : and as many in each case of pa.<>t exceeding months, and deficient days,
n^d the residues. Com.
Sect. V. EQUATION INVOLVING SEVERAL UNKNOWN. 353
of nilaca is assumed such, that no defect may ensue: say 131. This is resi-
due of signs. Multiplying by it [the coefficient of] nilaca, and adding [the
product] to the absolute number, the pulverizer is deduced, 1 : it is the value
of cdlaca; that is, the past revolutions. The quotient is the value of ydvat-
tdvat, and is the number of [elapsed] days, 41.
In the second example, multiplying by twelve the residue of revolutions,
subtracting signs multiplied by their divisor, the residue of signs is obtained
ya60 ca 1644 «« 137- Adding to this the number of [elapsed] days, and
making the sum equal to one hundred and seventy-two, the statement of the
equation is ya6\ ca 1644 ni 137 ruO Subtraction being made and the
yaO caO niO ru \ 72
value of nilaca being assumed five, the pulverizer is deduced, 1 . It is the
value of cdlaca. The quotient is the value of ydvat-tdvat ; and is the num-
ber of [elapsed] days, 41.
In the third example, past signs are ya 60 ca 1644 ni 1. Adding residue
137
of signs, the sum is yaGO ca 1644 nilS6 ; to which adding the number of
137
[elapsed] days, the result is ya 197 ca 1644 ni 136. This is equal to a hun-
137
dred and seventy-seven [to be] reduced to a common denomination. Putting
131 for the value of nilaca, and by means of the pulverizer, the number of
days comes out 41.
In the fourth example, the sum of past signs and residue is
ya 60 ca 1644 ni 136. It is equal to a hundred and twenty-six [to be]
137
reduced to the like denomination. With this value of nilaca 131, the mul-
tiplier is deduced, 2. The quotient is the number of days, 41. Or else 178 ;
or 315. The like is to be understood also in the case of revolutions and the
rest.
When the number of days less the [complete] signs is given, what is the
' number of days? Here, as before, the [complete] signs are j/a 60 ca 1644 nil.
137
The number of days, less that, is 5^a77 ca 1 644 ni 1. This is equal to si
137^
z z
354
BRAHMEGUPTA.
Chapter XVIII.
hundred and twenty-four.* Nilaca being assumed seventeen, the multiplier
is deduced 4; and the quotient 135. It is the number of days.
In the second example, residue of signs ya60 ca 1644 ni 137. Sub-
tracting this from the number of days, the remainder is ya 59 ca 1644 ni 137.
It is equal to a hundred and eight. Eleven'' being put for nilaca, the multi-
plier comes out 4; and the quotient 135. This is the number of [elapsed]
days.
In the third example, sum of past signs and residue _ ya 60 ca 1644 ni 136.
137
The number of days, less that, is ya 77 ca 1644 ni 136. It is equal to a
137
hundred and seven. Nilaca being assumed seventeen, the multiplier comes
out 4; and the quotient, or number of days, 135.
In the fourth example, past signs ya60 ca 1644 ni 1. Residue of signs,
137
ni 1. Difference of these reduced to like denominators, ya60 ca 1644 ?ii 138.
m
It is equal to six. Subtraction being made on both sides, and seventeen
being arbitrarily put for nilaca, the multiplier is found 4; and the quotient,
or number of days, 135.
Next, from the sum of past degrees and number of [elapsed] days, [the
elapsed time is to be sought]. Here, as before, the residue of signs is
ya60 ca 1644 ni'137- Multiplying this by thirty, subtracting residue of
degrees put equal to pitaca, and dividing by the divisor, the quotient is past
! degrees, which thus come out ya 1800 cfl 49320 n/4110 pi 1. The uum-
137
her of days being added, the sum is equal to 21, the assumed amount of
degrees and number of days. Subtraction being made on the two
sides of equation reduced to a common denominator, the result is
ca 49320 WJ4110 pi 1 rw 2877. Here substituting with four for nilaca,
(ya) 1937
and with fifty-three for pitaca, and adding the values so raised to the absolute
number, the multiplier thence deduced is 0; and the quotient 10.
' This had not been previously proposed : probably from defect of the manuscript.
» Sic.
Sect. V. EQUATION INVOLVING SEVERAL UNKNOWN. 355
• The like process is to be followed, [for deducing the elapsed time] from
the sum of residues of degrees and number of [elapsed] days.
Next, the number of days with past seconds is [given] twenty-two : what
is in this instance the number of elapsed days?^ Here the number of days, is
put ya 1. Whence, as before, the residue of minutes, ya 108000
cfl! 295*9200 Wi 246600 pi8Q20 lo 137. This, multiplied by sixty, lessened
by subtraction of residue of seconds equal to haritaca, and divided by the
divisor, the quotient is seconds; which, added to the number of days, is
equal to the proposed twenty-two. Subtraction being made on the two sides
of equation reduced to a like denominator, the value o^ ydvat-tdvat comes out
ca 177552000 ni 14796000 pi 493200 lo 8220 ha 1 ru 3014. Here,
ya 6480137
substituting with four for n'llaca, with eleven for pitaca, with twenty-three for
lohitaca, with ninety-six for haritaca, and adding the values so raised to the
absolute number, the additive becomes 64801370. Whence, as before, the
multiplier is found 0; and the quotient, or value of ydvat-tdvat, 10. It is
the number of [elapsed] days. Subtracting this from twenty-two, the re-
mainder is the [past] seconds, 12.
A similar process is to be followed [for the elapsed time] from the sum of
residue of seconds and number of days.
Example : If the elapsed [portion of the] cycle, added to the past exceed-
ing months, be equal to three thousand, one hundred and thirty-two, tell the
elapsed [portion of the] cycle.
Elapsed [part of the] cycle ya 1 . Multiplied by the number of exceeding
months in a yuga in least terms, and divided by the solar days in a yiiga also
in least terms, the result is ya \. From this subtracting the residue of ex-
7800
ceeding months, ca 1, the remainder is [complete] exceeding months,
ya \ ca \. Adding to this the elapsed [time of the] cycle, {ya 1,) it becomes
1800
t/a 1801 ca \; and is equal to 3132. Subtraction being made on the two
1800
sides of equation reduced to a like denominator, the multiplier comes out
' The preceding examples not being specifically proposed, like this instance, and the example of
minutes and their residue being omitted, the manuscript may be concluded to be deficient.
Z Z 2
356
BRAHMEGUPTA.
Chapter XVIII.
970; and the quotient, 3130. This is the elapsed [portion of the] yuga.
Subtracting it from three thousand, two hundred and thirty-two, the re-
mainder is the number of past exceeding months, 2.
In Hke manner, find severally the elapsed [time of the] cycle from elapsed
time added to residue of exceeding months, and to the sum of the past ex-
ceeding months and their residue, and from the sum of [complete] exceeding
months and their residue. Four other problems are likewise to be under-
stood for finding elapsed time from the difference between this and the
complete exceeding months, and so forth.
Example: If the elapsed [portion of a] \imaT yuga, added to the past [de-
ficient] days, be equal to one thousand, nine hundred and eighty-two, tell me
the elapsed lunar time.
Number of lunar days, ya 1. Multiplied hy fewer days in least terms,
and divided by lunar days also in least terms, the result is ya 7- Subtracting
555
the residue oi facer days, for which put culaca 1, the remainder is the num-
ber oi fewer days complete, ya7 ca\. This, added to the numljer of lunar
'555
days, ya 562 ca 1, is equal to one thousand, nine hundred and eighty- two
T5
(1982). Subtraction being made on the two sides of equation reduced to
like denominators, the multiplier, or value of calaca, is found 386; it is the
residue o^fciver days. The quotient, or value of ydvat-tavat, is 1958. It is
the number of [elapsed] lunar days.
In like manner other problems are to be understood.
56. Question 21. He, who tells the number of [elapsed] days, from the
residue of minutes added to the residue of degrees of the luminary,' on a
Wednesday* [or any given day], or from their difference, is a pcison ac-
quainted with the pulverizer.
* Bh&nu, luminary, applied especially to the sun ; but here apparently intending any planet.
See the following problems, and the commentator's remarks on Question 25.
* In this and several following instances, a day is specified ; but no notice of this condition is
taken in the example and its solution, until Question 23.
Sect. V. EQUATION INVOLVING SEVERAL UNKOWN. 357
Example : Seeing the residue of degrees of the moon,' with the residue of
minutes added thereto, equal to five hundred and thirty-six; or with that
subtracted from it, equal to three hundred and forty-four: tell the number
of days.
Here the number of days is put ya 1. This, multiplied by the revolutions
of the sun in least terms, and divided by the divisor, is ya 3. Subtracting
1096
from the number of days taken into the revolutions, the divisor taken into
the quotient^ represented by cdlaca, the remainder is residue of degrees,
ya 3 ca IO96. Hence, as before, the residue of degrees is found ya 1080
cfl 394560 wf 32880 pi 1096. This is reserved; and multiplying it by
sixty, dividing by the divisor, subtracting the divisor taken into the quotient*
represented by lohitaca, the remainder is the residue of degrees, ya 64800
ca £3673600 ni 1972800 pi 65760 lo 1096. Thus the sum of these resi-
dues of degrecsand minutes is ya 65880 ca 24068160 ni 2005680 pi 66^56
lo 1096. It is equal to 536. Subtraction being made, the value oi' nilaca is
assumed, ru 1; that of pitaca, 10; of lohitaca, 24; and multiplying the
[coefficients of] those by their values, [as assumed,] and adding the products
to absolute number, the amount of the absolute number becomes 2701080.
Whence, as before, the multiplier is found ; and the quotient, or number of
days, 4 1 .
The difference between the residues of degrees and of minutes is i/a 63720
Cfl 23279040 mH 939920 />< 64664 lo 1096. It is equal to 344. Subtrac-
tion being made, and putting the same values for nilaca and the rest, the
multiplier comes out, as before, 0; and the quotient, or value of ydvat-
tdvat, 41. It is the number of days.
Or what occasion is there for this trouble ? Putting y&vat-tdvat for the re-
sidue of degrees, and multiplying by sixty, divide by the divisor. Subtrac-
ting from it the divisor taken into the quotient' represented by cdlaca, the
. remainder is residue of minutes. Then making; the sum of residues of mi-
nutes and degrees equal to the proposed sum, and, equal subtraction being
made, the value of ydvat-tdvat, which comes out, is the residue of degrees ;
from which, as before, the number of [elapsed] days is to be inferred.
Or else, finding the residue of degrees, and that of minutes, as arising for
' So the original. But the example is wrought as an instance of the sun.
* Exclusive of the fractional residue.
858 BRAHMEGUPTA. Chafter XVIII.
one day, and taking their sum and their difference, the number of [elapsed]
days is to be found by the constant pulverizer thence deduced.
In like manner [the modes of solution] are manifold.
57. Question 22. When is the residue of degrees of the sun, with three
added, equal to the residue of minutes, on a Wednesday? or with six, seven,
or eight, subtracted? Solving [the problem] within a year [the proficient is]
a mathematician.
Here sun is indefinite; and the question extends therefore to any given
planet. In this place an instance of the moon is exhibited. It is as follows.
Value of the number of days, ya \. Whence the residue of degrees of the
moon, ya 1800 cfl 49320 w« 4110 pi 137. So the residue of minutes is
this, j/« 108000 ca 2959200 m' 346600 pi 82Q0 lo 137. Here the jesidue
of degrees, with three added, is equal to the residue of minutes. Subtrac-
tion being made on both sides, and with two put for nilaca, thirteen for
pitaca, and thirty-four for lohitaca, the multiplier is brought out, value of
cdlaca, 1 ; and the quotient, value of ydvat-tdvat, 5S. The value of cdlaca
is the complete revolutions ; that oi nilaca, the past signs; that oi pitaca, the
degrees ; and that of lohitaca, the minutes.
In like manner, making the residue of degrees less six, or that residue less
seven, or the same less eight, equal to the residue of minutes, the number of
[elapsed] days is to be found, as before.
58. Question 23. When is the residue of degrees of the sun equal to the
[complete] degrees ; or the residue of minutes, to the minutes, on a given
day? Solving [this problem] within a year [the proficient is] a mathema-
tician.
Here also sun is indefinite, and intends any planet. Therefore the residue
of degrees of the moon is taken, ya 1800 ca 49320 7ii 4110 pi 137. This
is equal to the complete degrees, the value of which is represented by pitaca.
Subtraction being made, and with ten put for 7iilaca, and ten for pitaca, the
multiplier comes out 1, and the quotient 51. This is the number of [elapsed]
days.
With this number of days, the residue of degrees of the moon is equal to
the complete degrees.
In the very same manner, residue of minutes of the moon, ya 108000
Sect. V. EQUATION INVOLVING SEVERAL UNKNOWN. 359
ca 2959200 n'l 246600 p'l 8220 lo IsV- This is equal to the complete
minutes, the value of which is represented by lohitaca. Subtraction being
made on the two sides of the equation, and with nine for nilaca, eleven for
p'ltaca, and ten for lohitaca, the multiplier comes out 4; and the quotient the
value of the number of days, 131. To find for the given day, the given
multiple of the divisor is to be added.
Or what occasion is there for the trouble of supposing [values of] colours?
Vutim^ ydvat-tdvat for the residue of degrees; and from that multiplied by
thirty and divided by the divisor, subtracting tlie quotient* represented by
c&laca, taken into its divisor, the remainder is residue of degrees. Making
it equal to degrees, equal subtraction is then to be made; whence the value
of ydvat-tdvat is brought out. It is the residue of degrees; from which, as
before, the number of [elapsed] days is to be deduced.
59. Question 24. Residue oi fewer days, with a given quantity added or
subtracted, or residue of Tfiore months, with the like, is equal to fewer days;
or to more months. Solving [this problem] within a year [the proficient is] a
mathematician.
It is as follows. Elapsed [portion of the] yuga 1 . Multiplied by exceed-
ing months in least terms, and divided by solar days also in least terms, and
the quotient lessened by subtraction of cdlaca representing the complete ex-
ceeding months, the result is^a 1 ca 1080. It is the residue of exceeding
months, and is equal to cdlaca. Whence the multiplier comes out 1, and the
quotient 1081. This is the elapsed [portion of the] yuga.
Or equal to cdlaca with five added. The quotient, which is the elapsed
yuga, comes out 1086.
In the question relating to fewer days, the elapsed [portion of the] yuga is
ya 1. This, multiplied by deficient days in least terms, and divided by lunar
days, and lessened by subtraction of the divisor taken into cdlaca put for the
quotient,' the result is ya 7 ca 555. This is equal to cdlaca. The multi-
plier thus comes out 7; and the quotient, the value o£ ydvat-tdvat, 556. It
is the elapsed lunar yuga.
Or equal to cdlaca, with three added ; the multiplier comes out 6 ; and
the quotient, or elapsed yuga, 477-
' Exclusive of the fractional residue.
S60
BRAHMEGUPTA.
Chapter XVIII.
Or equal to c&laca, less two, the multiplier is found 3; and the quotient,
or elapsed _y«5'fl, 238.
60. Question 25. The sun's' divisor in least terms, multiplied by seventy,
and lessened by the residue of degrees,* is exactly divisible by a myriad.
Solving [this problem] within a year [the proficient is] a mathematician.
Here the sun's divisor in least terms is 1096. This, multiplied by seventy,
is 76720. " Lessened by the residue of degrees :" the value of residue of de-
grees is put ya 1 : less that, is ya \ ru 76720. This divided by a myriad is
exact. Statement 3/fl i ru 76720. The value of the quotient is put cdlaca 1.
10000
Making this taken into the divisor equal to the dividend, and equal subtrac-
tion being then made, the rpsiilt is ca iOOOO ru 76720. The pulverizer
comes out 1. It is the multiplier, and the value of y&vat-tavat is 76720.
This is the residue of degrees : whence the number of [elapsed] days is de-
duced, 95.
Abridging by eighty, it is found by means of the constant pulverizer.
This is to be variously illustrated by example.
' Sun (bh&nu) is here indefinite ; and intends planets generally.
I This is indefinite. Residue of revolutions, and the like, is intended.
Com.
Com.
( 361 )
SECTION vr.
EQUATION INVOLVING A FACTUM.
61. Rule : § 36. The [product of] multiplication of the factum and abso-
lute number, added to the product of the [coefficients of the] unknown, is
divided by an arbitrarily assumed quantity. Of the arbitrary divisor and
the quotient, whichever is greatest is to be added to the least [coefficient],
and the least to the greatest. The two [sums] divided by the [coefficient
of the] factum are reversed.
62. Question 26. From the product of signs and degrees of the sun,
subtracting thrice the signs and four times the degrees, and seeuig ninety
[for the remainder, find the place of] the sun. Solving [this problem]
within a year [the proficient is] a mathematician.
Signs of the sun^^a 1. Degrees ca 1. Their product ya.cahh 1. Sub-
tracting from this thrice the signs and four times the degrees, the result is
ya.ca bh \ ya h ca 4. It is equal to ninety. Subtraction being made, see
the result: ya 3 ca 4> ru 30 Here the multiplication of the [coefficient of
ya.ca bh 1
the] factum and absolute number is 90. With the product [of the coeffi-
' In an example, in which a factum arises from the multiplication of two or of more colours,
having made two sides equal, and taking the factum from one side, subtract the absolute number
together with the [single] colours from the other. The equation so standing, the rule takes effect.
TTie multiplication of absolute number by the coefficient of the factum is termed multiplication
of the factum and absolute number. That, together with the product of the two unknown, is to be
divided by an arbitrary quantity. Between the arbitrary divisor and quotient, the greater is to be
added to the less coefficient, and the less to the greater coefficient. The two sums, divided by the
coefficient of the factum, being reversed, arc values of the colours. The meaning is, that, to which
the coefficient o{ y/nat-tdxat is added, is the value of cdlaca; and that, to which the coefficient of
cdlaca is added, is the value oi ydvat-tixat.
But, when a factum consisting of many colours occurs, then reserving two, and assuming arbi-
trary values for the rest of the colours, multiply by them the factum of the two reserved colours.
Thence the rest is to be done as above directed. Com.
3 A
362 BRAHMEGUPTA. Chapter XVIII.
cients] of the unknown, namely 12, added, it becomes 102. Divided by the
assumed number 17, the quotient is 6. It is " least;" and to it is added the
greater coefficient 4, making 10. The " greater" is 17; to which the least
coefficient 3 is added, making 20. These, divided by the [coefficient of the]
factum [viz. 1], become values of yAvat-tavat and calaca, 10 and 20. Signs
of the sun 10; degrees 20. Its degrees [320], multiplied by the divisor in
least terms, namely IO96, (making 350720,) and divided by the degrees in a
revolution [360], yield as product the residue of revolutions. With unity
added, that residue is 975. Whence, as before directed, the number of
[elapsed] days is to be found, 325.
63 — 64. Rule:* § 37 — 38. With the exception of one selected colour, put
arbitrary values for the rest of those, the product of which is the factum.
The sum of the products of the [coefficients of] colours by those [assumed
values] is absolute number. The product of the assumed values of colours
and [coefficient of] the factum is coefficient- of the selected colour. Thus
the solution is effiscted without an equation of the factum. What occasion
then is there for it?
Here the foregoing example (Qu. 26) serves. As before, having done as
directed, the two sides of equation become ya 3 c« 4 ru 90 Reserving
ya .ca bh 1
ycivat-tdvat, Avhich is selected, an arbitrary value is put for calaca 20. The
coefficient of calaca, multiplied by that, is 80 ; added to absolute number,
this becomes 570. Now the coefficient of the factum (1), multiplied by
calaca, becomes coefficient of ydvat-tdvat, 20. Statement of the two sides of
equation thus prepared, ya 3 ru 170 Proceeding by a former rule (§ 32),
3/a20
the value of ydvat-tdvat comes out 10.
' Having thus set forth the [solution of a] factum according to the doctrine of others, the author
now delivers his own method with a censure on the other. Com.
* Sanc'hyii, number: meaning coefficient usually expressed by anca, figure.
I
( 363 )
SECTION VII.
SQUARE AFFECTED BY COEFFICIENT.
65 — 66. Rule: § 39 — 40. A root [is set down] two-fold: and [another,
deduced] from the assumed square multiplied by the multiplier, and in-
creased or diminished by a quantity assumed. The product of the first
[pair], taken into the multiplier, with the product of the last [pair] added, is
a "last" root.' The sum of the products of oblique multiplication is a " first"
root. The additive is the product of the like additive or subtractive quan-
tities. The roots [so found], divided by the [original] additive or subtractive
quantity, are [roots answering] for additive unity.*
' The terras familiarly used for the practice of solution of problems under this head are here
explained : viz.
Canisht'ha or 6dya (pada or mula) least or first root ; that quantity, of which the square multi-
plied by the given multiplicator and having the given addend added, or subtrahend subtracted, is
capable of affording an exact square root.
Jyeshi'ha or antya (pada or mula) greatest or last root : the square-root which is extracted from
the quantity so operated upon.
Pracrni, the multiplier [the coefficient of the first square].
Cshepa, cshiptic6, chipti, additive, or addend : the quantity to be added to the square of the least
root multiplied by the multiplicator, to render it capable of yielding an exact square-root.
Svd'haca, subtractive, or subtrahend : the quantity to be subtracted for the like purpose.
Udvartaca, the quantity assumed for the purpose of the operation.
j^pararla, abridger, common measure ; the divisor, which is assumed for both or either of the
<|uantities.
Vqjru-bad'ha, forked or oblique [that is, cross] multiplication. See Vij.-gan. § 77- Com.
* The root of any square quantity is to be set down twice ; that is, being repeated, the second
is to be put under the first. These two are " least" roots. Then multiplying by the multiplicator
the square of the " least" root, consider what quantity, added W subtracted, will render it capable of
yielding an exact root. The quantity, of which the addition effects that, is " additive." That,
of which the subtraction effects it, is " subtractive." So doing, the root, which is afforded, is
" greatest" root. This also is to be set down in two places, in front of the " least" roots. Being so
arranged, the product of the two least roots multiplied by the multiplicator, with the product
of the two greatest, is a " greatest" root. That is to say, it is so by composition. The product
of multiplication crosswise, or obliquely, like forked or crossing lightning, is product of oblique
multiplication. That is, the least and greatest roots are twice multiplied cornerwise. The
3 A 2
364 BRAHMEGUPTA. Chapter XVIII.
61. Question 87. Making the square of the residue of signs and mi-
nutes on a Wednesday, multiplied by ninety-two and eighty-three respec-
tively, with one added to the product, [afford, in each instance] an exact
square, [a person solving this problem] within a year [is] a mathematician.
Here the assumed square is put 1 . Its root is " least" root. Set down
twice, L 1 Again the same square, multiplied by ninety-two, and having
L 1
eight added [to make it yield a square-root], amounts to 100: the root of
which is " greatest," 10. Statement of them in order L 1 G 10 A 8 Then,
L 1 G 10 A8
pjoceeding by the rule (the product of the first taken into the multiplier, &c.
§ 39 — 40) the " least" and " greatest" roots for additive sixty-four are found
L 20 G 192 A 64. By the concluding part of the rule (§ 40) the " least" and
" greatest" roots for additive unity come out L ^ G 24 A 1 . Again, from this,
by the combination of like ones, other least and greatest roots are brought out
L 120 G 1 151 A 1. Here the " least" root is residue of degrees. Whence,
as before, the number of [elapsed] days is deduced, Qs.
In the second example, the square assumed is 1. Its square-root is
" least" root, ]. From the assumed square, multiplied by eighty-three, and
lessened by subtraction of two, the square-root extracted is " greatest," 9.
Proceeding by the rule (§ ^'^■, the " greatest" root comes out, 164 ; and by the
sequel of it (§40), the " least" root, 18; and these, divided by the sub-
tractive, namely 2, become roots for additive unity, L 9 G 82 A 1 . The
" least" is residue of minutes: whence, as before, the number of [elapsed] days
is found, 22.
68. Rule: §41.' Putting severally the roots for additive unity under roots
for the given additive or subtractive, " last" and " first" roots [thence deduced
by composition] serve for the given additive or subtract! ve."
sum of these two products is a " least" root by composition. But the additive by composition
amounts to the product of the two lii<e additives or subtractives. Then the least and greatest roots,
so derived from composition, being divided by the number of the [original] additive, or by that of
the subtractive, are roots serving when unity is the additive. Com.
■ When the additive is many [i. e. more than unity]. Com.
* Under least and greatest roots, which serve for the given additive or subtractive, are to be
placed least and greatest roots serving for additive unity; then the roots, which are found by the
foregoing rule (§ 39—40), arc roots which also serve for the same given additive or subtractive.
Com.
Sect. VII. SQUARE AFFECTED BY COEFFICIENT. ' 365
An example will be given further on.'
69. Rule: § 42. When the additive is four, the square of the last root, less
three, being halved and multiplied by the last, is a last root ; and the square
of the last root, less one, being divided by two and multiplied by the first, is
a first root, [for additive unity].*
70. Question 28. jNIaking the square of the residue of revolutions or the
like, multiplied by three and having nine hundred added, an exact sc[uare ; or
having eight hundred subtracted; [a persou solving this problem] within a
year [is] a mathematician.
Here the assumed square is put 4. Its root is a least root 2. Its square 4,
multiplied by the coefficient 3, is 12 ; and with 4 added, 16. Its square-
root is a greatest root, 4. L £, G 4. From this are to be found roots for
additive unity. Here the last root is 4 : its square ]6; less three, 13 ; halved,
J^; multiplied by last root, 26; this is a last root for additive unity. Again,
square of the last root, 16; less one, 15; divided by two, ^; multiphed by
the first root, gives a first root, 15. The meaning of the rest of the question
is shown [farther on].'
71. Rule:* § 43. When four is subtract! ve, the square of the last root is
twice set down, having three added in one instance and one in the other :
• See Qu. 32.
* Under the rule " A root is set down twofold," &c. (§ 39), if four be the additive, then the
[original] last root being squared, and lessened by three, the half of the remainder, multiplied by the
last root, is a last root, answering, however, to additive unity. Again, the square of the [original]
t&st root, lessened by one, divided by two, and multiplied by least root, is a least root, the additive
being unity. Co.v.
' See Qu. 32.
♦ Rule to find roots answering for additive unity, from roots which serve when four is subtractive.
Com.
Of least and greatest roots serving when four is subtractive, the square of" last" root is twice
set down, having three added in the one instance, and one added in the other. The moiety of the
product of those reserved quantities is also to be twice set down, having one subtracted in the one
instance, and as it stood in the other. That which is diminished by one, is next " multiplied by
the former less one;" that is to say, multiplied by the square of " last" root [having three added]
less one. So doing, the result is " greatest" root for unity additive. The moiety of the product,
which was set down as it stood, being multiplied by the product of" least" and " greatest" roots, is
" least" root for additive unity. Com.
366 BRAHMEGUPTA. Cuapter XVIII.
half the product of these sums is set apart, and the same less one. This,
multiplied by tlie former less one, is " last" root. The other, multiplied by
the product of the roots, is " first" root answering to that " last.'
72. Question 29. The square of residue of exceeding months, multi-
plied by thirteen, and having three lumdrcd added, or the cube of three sub-
tracted, affords an exact square. A person solving [this problem] is a
mathematician.
Here the assumed square is put 1. Its root is 1: it is a least root. The
square of this multiplied by thirteen, and lessened by four, is 9- Root of the
remainder 3 : a greatest root is thus found. From these least and greatest
roots, L 1 G 3, roots are to be found for additive unit\-. In this case, the
last root is 3: its square twice, 9 and 9; with three and one added, 12 and
10.* Again, half the product of those reserved quantities, (>0: multiplied by
the product of the least and greatest roots, namely, 3, makes 180. The least
root is thus found. The purport of the rest of the question is shown further
on.*
73. Rule:' § 44. If a square be the multiplier, the additive [or subtractive]
divided by any [assumed] number, and having it added and subtracted, and
being then [in both instances] halved; the first is a " last" root; and the last,
divided by the square-root of the multiplier, is a " first."*
74. Question 30. The square of a residue of revolutions, or the like,
multiplied by four, and having sixty-five added, or having sixty subtracted,
is a square. Solving [this problem] within a year [the proficient is] a mathe-
matician.
• Something is here wanting n the MS. /" igx 10 — 1 \ x(3^+3—])=a9x 11=649=
(180^x13)4-1.
' See below.
^ To find roots, when the coefficient is an exact square. Com.
♦ When a square number is the multiplier, the additive must be divided by any number arbitra-
rily put. The quotient must then have the same assumed number added in one place and sub-
tracted in another. Having thus formed two terms, halve them both. The first of these moieties
' is " greatest' root. The second, divided by the square-root of the multiplier, is " least" root. Com.
In one case, however, the first of the moieties, divided by the square-root of the coelTicient, is
" least" root, and the second is" greatest" root ; as is lemarked under the following example.
Section VII. SQUARE AFFECTED BY COEFFICIENT. 367
Statement: IVIultipHcr 4. Additive 65. Here the additive divided by an
arbitrarily assumed number, 5, is 13. This, increased and lessened l)y the
assumed number, becomes 1 8 and 8. The half of the first of these is " greatest"
root, 9. The moiety of the second, divided by the root of the multiplier, 2,
gives the " least" root, S.
Statement of the second example : IMultiplier 4. Additive 6'0. " Additive"
in the rule (§ 44) is indefinite and intends subtractive also. Here let the.
assumed number be 2. By this, the subtractive, namely, 60