Skip to main content

Full text of "The American journal of sociology"

See other formats


^k^ 


COLLEGE 
OF  THE  PACIFIC 


From  the  collection  of  the 


Z     ^ 

X .^    m 


0  PreTnger 
^    Uibrary 


San  Francisco,  California 
2008 


THE     AMERICAN    JOURNAL 

OF 

SOCIOLOGY 


EDITOR 

ALBION  W.  SMALL 

associate  editors 

Frederick  Starr  Marion  Talbot 

Scott  E.  W.  Bedford 


Vol.  26 

BIMONTHLY 

JULY,   1920  — MAY,  1921 


THE  UNIVERSITY  OF  CHICAGO  PRESS 
CHICAGO,  ILLINOIS 


Published 

July,  September,  November,  1920 

January,  March,  May,  1921 


V.  ^e 


Composed  and  Printed  By 

The  University  ol  Chicago  Press 

Chicago.  Illinois,  U.S.A. 


CONTENTS 


ARTICLES 

PAGE 

American  Sociological  Society,  Annual  Meeting  of-      -      -      -      -      -354 

American  Sociological  Society,  Co-operative^Jnvestigation  -      -      -      -    353 

Baker,  Herbert  M.    The  Court  and  the  Delinquent  Child     -      -      -     176 
Beatty,  Willard  W.    A  Normal-School  Course  in  Sociology  -      -      -     573 
BODENHAFER,  WALTER  B.    The  Comparative  Role  of  the  Group  Con- 
cept in  Ward's  Dynamic  Sociology  and  Contemporary  American 

Sociology -      -      -273,425,588,716 

CooLEY,    Charles   H.    Reflections   upon   the   Sociology   of   Herbert 

Spencer --------.129 

Cummins,  Robert  A.    A  Completely  Socialized  School      -      .      .      .    jq^ 
Davies,  G.  R.    Progress  and  the  Constructive  Instincts     -      -      -      -    212 

Dissertations  in  Sociology,  Students'    --------96,  767 

Donald,  W.  J.     Public  Service  through  Chambers  of  Commerce     -      -     558 
DowD,  Jerome.     Industrial  Democracy    --------     ^Si 

Elliot,  Thomas  D.    A  Psychoanalytic  Interpretation  of  Group  Forma- 
tion and  Behavior --    ^;^^ 

Ellwood,  Charles  A.  Education  for  Citizenship  in  a  Democracy  -  73 
Groves,  Ernest  R.  A  College  Program  for  Rural  Sociology  -  -  -  187 
Learned  Societies,  The  American  Council  of-      -      -      -      -      -      -224 

Morgan,  John  J.  B.    Why  Men  Strike 207 

Pangburn,  Weaver.     The  War  and  the  Community  Movement    -      -      82 

Park,  Robert  E.     Sociology  and  the  Social  Sciences 401 

Rosenberg,  Edwin  J.    The  Price  System  and  Social  Management        -     162 
Small,  Albion  W.    A  Prospectus  of  Sociological  Theory    -      -      -      -      22 

Steiner,  Jesse  F.     Education  for  Social  Work      -      -      -      -  475^  601,  744 

Stewart,  Herbert  L.     Some  Ambiguities  in  Democracy  -      -      -      -     545 

Students'  Dissertations  in  Sociology    --------96,  767 

Thompson,  James  Westfall.    The  Aftermath  of  the  Black  Death  and 

the  Aftermath  of  the  Great  War -     565 

Trimble,  William.    The  Social  Philosophy  of  the  Loco-Foco  Democ- 
racy  - 705 

Usher,  Abbott  Payson.    Justice  and  Poverty 689 

Woodruff,  Clinton  Rogers.    Progress  in  Philadelphia    -      -      -      -    315 

Woods,  Erville  B.     Heredity  and  Opportunity 1,146 

Yarros,  Victor  S.    What  Shall  We  Do  with  the  State  ?  II      -      -      -      60 

V 


vi  CONTENTS 

'  REVIEWS 

PAGE 

Antonelli,    Etienne.       Bolshevik    Russia.       Translated    by    C.    A. 

Carroll.— V.  E.  Helleberg -      -      -      -113 

Aronovici,    Carol.       Housing    and    the    Housing    Problem. — R.  D. 

McKciizic      ----- 658 

Athearn,   Walter    S.      A   National    System   of    Education. — /.  .4. 

Artnmn  ---- -  240 

Barker,  J.  Ellis.    Modern  Germany       --------  662 

Benoit-Levy,  Georges.    Extreme  Urgence. — Carol  Aronovici  -      -      -  253 
Bevan,  Edwyx.     German  Social  Democracy  during  the  War. — R.  F. 

Clark      -------- 252 

Binder,  Rudolph  M.    Health  and  Social  Progress. — Carl  Kelsey    -      -  652 

Bloomfield,  Daniel.    The  Problems  of  Labor. — R.  W.  Stone  -      -      -  242 

Boucke,  O.  Fred.     The  Limits  of  Socialism. — V.  E.  Helleherg  -      -      -  642 
Brainard,  Annie  M.     Organization  of  Public  Health  Nursing. — R.  D. 

McKenzie     --------------  659 

Breckinridge,  Sophonisba  P.    See  Talbot,  Marion. 

Brief AULT,  Robert.    The  Making  of  Humanity. — A.  J.  Todd        -      -  648 

Brooks,  John   Graham.    Labor's   Challenge  of  the  Social  Order. — 

A.J.  Todd    --------------  524 

Brunhes,  Jean.     Human  Geography. — R.  E.  Park      -----  785 

BiJLOW,  Friedrich.     Die  Entwicklung  der  Hegelschen  Sozialphilosophie. 

A.  W.  Small        -------------  787 

Burnham,  Athel  C.     The  Community  Health  Problem     -      -      -       -  661 

BuTTREE,  J.  Edmund.     The  Despoilers. — Dwight  Sanderson       -      -      -  659 
Chancellor,  William  E.    Educational  Sociology. — S.  A.  Queen    -      -  240 
Chapin,  F.  Stuart.     Field  Work  and  Social  Research. — 5.  M.  Harrison  784 
Clow,  Frederic  R.     Principles  of  Sociology  with  Educational  Applica- 
tions.—£.  R.  Groves  -      -      - 629 

CoLCORD,  Joanna  C.    Broken  Homes. — E.  E.  Eubank        .      .      .      -  528 

Cole,  G.  D.  H.    Social  Theory.— .4.  IF.  >Sww//      ------  247 

Cooke,  George  W.    The  Social  Evolution  of  Religion.— £.  C.  Hayes    -  646 

Coursault,  Jesse  B.    The  Principles  of  Education. — C.  .1.  Ellwood    -  654 
Gushing,  Sumner  W.    See  Huntington,  Ellsworth. 

Davies,  George  R.    National  Evolution. — G.  S.  Dow        .      .      -      -  248 
Davison,  Henry  B.    The  American  Red  Cross  in  the  Great  War.—/.  L. 

Gillin ---------  36Q 

Dewey,  Evelyn.     New  Schools  for  Old.— IF.  R.  Smil/i      -      -      -      -  379 
Dick,  J.  Lawsen.     Defective  Housing  and  the  Growth  of  Children. — 

Carol  Aronovici   --- 53° 

Donovan,  Francis.    The  Woman  Who  Waits.— P/iyll is  Blanchard        -  640 
Dunlap,   Knight.     Personal  Beauty  and   Racial  Betterment.— £.  5. 

Bogardus ---307 


CONTENTS  vii 

PACE 

East,  Edwin  M.     Inbreeding  and  Outbreeding. — L.  L.  Bernard      -      -     251 
Edie,  Lionel  D.     Current  Social  and  Industrial  Forces. — R.  F.  Clark    -    367 
Elliot,  Hugh.     Modern  Science  and  Materialism. — C.  E.  Ayres    -      -     249 
Ellis,  Havelock.    The  Philosophy  of  Conflict  and  Other  Essays  in 

War  Time. — A.J.  Todd  -----------     237 

Fahlbeck,  Pontus.  Klasserna  och  Samhallet. — O.  B.  Ytrehus  -  -  633 
Fay,  Charles  Norman.  Labor  in  Politics,  or  Class  versus  Country  -  661 
Fleisher,  Alexander.    See  Frankel,  Lee  K. 

Folks,  Homer.  The  Human  Cost  of  the  War. — N.  L.  Sims  -  -  -  370 
Ford,  James.     United  States  Housing  Corporation  Report.     Vol.  I. — 

Carol  Aronovici   -------- 788 

Frankel,  Lee  K.,  and  Fleisher,  Alexander.    The  Human  Factor  in 

Industry. — R.  W.  Stone   -      -      -      -      -      -      -      -      -      -      -372 

Freeman,  Arnold.  Education  through  Settlements. — Mary  E.  McDowell  377 
Friedman,  E.  M.  (Editor).  America  and  the  New  Era. — Francis  Tyson  642 
Gallichan,  Walter  M.  Letters  to  a  Young  Man  on  Love  and  Health  663 
Gaston,  Herbert  E.  The  Nonpartisan  League. — Dwight  Sanderson  -  656 
Gill,  Charles  O.,  and  Pinchot,  Gifford.    Six  Thousand  Country 

Churches. — Allan  Hohen  -      -      -      -      -      -      -      -      -       -       -377 

Gle.\son,  Arthur.     What  the  Workers  Want. — Carol  Aronovici     -      -    637 

GooDE,  William  T.    Bolshevism  at  Work -      -661 

Gratton,  R.  H.  The  EngUsh  Middle  Class. — 5.  A.  Queen  -  -  -  791 
Gulick,  Luther  H.  A  Philosophy  of  Play. — C.  C.  North  -  -  -  -  644 
Hall,   Fred  S.,   and  Brooke,   Elizabeth   W.    American   Marriage 

Laws. — E.  E.  Eubank       _--- _-     380 

Hammond,  J.  L.  and  Barbara.    The  Skilled  Laborer,  1760-183 2. — 

W.  F.  Woodring - -    364 

Hammond,  M.  B.    British  Labor  Conditions  and  Legislation  during 

the  War. — E.  H.  Sutherland   ----------370 

Hetherington,  H.  J.  W.,  and  Muirhead,  J.  H.     Social  Purpose:   A 

Contribution  to  a  Philosophy  of  Civic  Society. — C.  A.  Ellwood        -    366 

Hicks,  Frederick  C.    The  New  World  Order 662 

Hudson,  Jay  William.    The  College  and  the  New   .\merica. — C.  A. 

Ellwood  ---------------    653 

Huntington,  Ellsworth,  and  Gushing,  Sumner  W.    Principles  of 

Human  Geography. — R.  E.  Park  ---------     785 

HussLEiN,  Joseph.  Democratic  Industry. — V.  E.  Helleberg  -  -  -  657 
Ioteyko,   Josefa.    The   Science   of   Labor   and   Its   Organization. — 

R.  W.  Stone  - ..._     ^y^ 

Keyn'es,   John   M.     The   Economic    Consequences   of    the    Peace. — 

C.  J.  Bushnell      -------------     238 

Knowles,  Morris.  Industrial  Housing. — Carol  Aronovici  .  .  .  660 
Laidler,  Harry  W.     Socialism  in  Thought  and  Action. — G.  S.  Dow     -    374 


viii  CONTENTS 

PAGE 

La  Motte,  Ellen  N.    The  Opium  Monopoly 662 

Lanzer,  William.    The  Nonpartisan  League. — Dwight  Sanderson  -      -  656 
Leary,    Daniel    B.    A    Group-Discussion    Syllabus    of    Sociology. — 

E.  S.  Bogardiis     -----------'--  368 

LiTOiFiELD,  Paul  W.    The  Industrial  Republic 662 

MacIver,  R.  M.     Labor  in  the  Changing  World. — E.  H.  Sutherland     -  242 

Marbi^rg.  Theodore.    League  of  Nations. — G.  S.  Dow     .      -      .      .  ygo 

Masaryk,  Thomas  G.    The  Spirit  of  Russia. — C.  A.  Ellwood   -      -      -  363 

Mathews,  Basil.    Essays  on  Vocation     --------  661 

Mechlin,  John  M.    An  Introduction  to  Social  Ethics. — A.  W.  Small    -  245 

Mendelsohn,  Sigmunt).    Labor's  Crisis.    An  Employer's  View    -      -  661 
MiTSCHERLiCH,    Waldemar.      Der    Nationalismus    Westeuropas. — E. 

Schwicdland -------526 

MuiRHEAD,  J.  H.    See  Hetherington,  H.  J.  W. 

Muscio,  Bernard.    Lectures  on  Industrial  Psychology. — E.S.  Bogardus  373 

New  Townsmen.    New  Towns  after  the  War. — Carol  Aronovici      -      -  250 
Odencrantz,   Louise   C.     Italian   Women   in   Industry. — Annie   M. 

MacLean       ---- 6^^ 

Page,  Thomas  Nelson.    Italy  and  the  World  War 662 

Parker,  Carleton  H.    The  Casual  Laborer  and  Other  Essays. — E.  S. 

Bogardus -.-..  ^27 

Patten,  William.    The  Grand  Strategy  of  Evolution. — A.  W.  Small    -  627 

Phelan,  John.    Readings  in  Rural  Sociology. — J.  B.  Sears      -      -      -  638 
Phelan,  John  J.     Pool,  Billiards  and  Bowling  Alleys  as  a    Place  of 

Commercialized  Amusements  in  Toledo,  Ohio. — R.  E.  Park      -      -  663 
PiNCHOT,  GiFFORD.    See  Gill,  Charles  O. 
Proceedings  of  the  International   Conference  of  Women  Physicians. 

See  Women  Physicians. 

Queen,  Stuart  Alfred.    The  Passing  of  the  County  Jail. — E.  Abbott    -  793 

Ross,  Edward  A.    The  Principles  of  Sociology. — A.  W.  Small-      -      -  no 

.    The  Principles  of  Sociology. — Hutton  Webster        -      -      -      -  651 

Russell,  Charles  Edward.    The  Story  of  the  Nonpartisan  League. — 

Dwight  Sanderson       -      - --  656 

Ryan,  John  A.    A  Living  Wage  ----------  662 

Sanger,  Margaret.    Woman  and  the  New  Race.— 5.  W.  and  T.  D. 

Eliot     ---------------  632 

ScHLiCHTER,  SuMNER  H.    The  Tumover  of  Factory  Labor.— £.  H. 

Sutherland     --------------  243 

Shefheld,  Ada  Elliot.     The  Social  Case  History.— £.  F.  Young    -      -  658 

SiDis,  Boris.    The  Source  and  Aim  of  Human  Progress. — A.J.Todd    -  236 
Sims,  Newell  L.    The  Rural  Community,  Ancient  and  Modem. — 

Paul  L.  Vogt       -------- 786 

Snedden,  David.    Vocational  Education.— /.  M.  Gillette  -      -      -      -  780 


CONTENTS  ix 


PAGE 


SoNNiCHSEN,  Albert.     Consumers'  Co-operation. — /.  E.  Hagerly   -      -  ^yi 

Spengler,  Oswald.     Der  Untergang  des  Abendlandes. — A.  IV.  Small    -  623 

Spooner,  Henry  J.     Wealth  from  Waste. — C.  /.  Bushnell  -      -      .      .  640 

Swisher,  Walter  S.  Religion  and  the  New  Psychology. — E.  R.  Groves  376 
Talbot,  Marion,  and  Breckinridge,  Sophonisba  P.    The  Modern 

Household. — Mary  L.  Mark   ----------529 

Thompson,  Frank  V.     Schooling  of  the  Immigrant. — Franklin  Bohbitt  -  655 

Torelle,  Ellen.  The  Political  Philosophy  of  Robert  M.  LaFoUette  -  661 
Trotter,  Eleanor.  Seventeenth- Century  Life  in  the  Country  Parish. — 

S.  A.  Queen  --------------  241 

ViNOGRADOFF,    SiR    Paul.     Outlines    of    Historical    Jurisprudence. — 

W.  B.  Bodenhafer --  783 

Wall,  O.  A.     Sex  and  Sex  Worship. — R.  E.  Park 663 

Walling,  William  E.    Sovietism. — A.  W.  Small  -      -----  250 

Ward,  Harry  Frederick.     The  Gospel  for  a  Working  World. — E.  L. 

Earp       --------- 7pi 

Whitaker,  Charles  H.  The  Joke  about  Housing. — Carol  Aronovici  -  244 
White,  William  A.    Thoughts  of  a  Psychiatist  on  the  War  and  After. — 

E.  R.  Groves  -------- 238 

William,    Maurice.     The   Social   Interpretation   of  History.— F.   E. 

Helleberg       -      - ---  ^29 

Williams,  Mary  W.    Social  Scandinavia  in  the  Viking  Age. — A.  E. 

Jenks     ------------...  632 

Women  Physicians,  Proceedings  of  the  International  Conference  of. — 

Leta  S.  Hollingsworth        -      - 789 


NEWS  AND  NOTES 

July,  1920 105 

September,  1920 227 

November,  1920 -.--..  ^57 

January,  1921       - -       -       -      -  519 

March,  1921  ---- 619 

May,  1921 - 775 


NOTES  AND  ABSTRACTS 

July,  1920      ------- -       -  114 

September,  1920  --------------  254 

November,  1920 -  380 

January,  1921      --------- 5^1 

March,  1921 - 664 

May,  1921 794 


CONTENTS 


BIBLIOGRAPHY 

PAGE 

July,  1920     ---------------  iio 

September,  1920  - -----  268 

November,  1920 39i 

January,  1921       ------- 533 

March,  1921 - 678 

May,  1921 --..--  800 


THE  AMERICAN 

JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 


Volume  XXVI  JULY     IQ20  Number  i 


HEREDITY  AND  OPPORTUNITY 


ERVILLE  B.  WOODS 
Dartmouth  College 


I.      EUGENICS   AND   THE   OBSCURE 

A  very  spirited  controversy  over  the  relative  influence  of 
''nature  and  nurture"  has  raged  through  the  writings  of  bio- 
sociologists  and  sociologists  of  the  ordinary  sort  for  so  long  a 
time  that  the  prospect  of  contributing  even  an  armful  of  brush 
to  the  illumination  of  this  problem  seems  rather  slight.  There 
are,  however,  few  matters  of  greater  popular  interest,  and  I  think 
we  may  say  of  greater  importance  from  the  standpoint  of  the 
education  of  youth,  than  the  attempt  to  trace  the  causes  by  which 
the  notably  successful,  the  notoriously  unsuccessful,  and  the 
innumerable  obscure  come  to  their  respective  states. 

The  orthodox  biological  view  regarding  these  matters  has,  it 
should  be  noted,  undergone  a  remarkable  change.  The  older 
environmentahsm  has  dechned  and  in  its  place  has  arisen  the 
present  cult  of  heredity  with  such  pessimistic  impUcations  inter- 
woven as  the  degree  of  eugenic  fervor  of  a  given  writer  may  lead 
him  to  venture  upon.  A  simple  statement  of  how  this  change 
has  come  about  may  be  in  place. 

The  Lamarckian  doctrine  of  use  and  disuse,  promulgated 
some  hundred  years  ago,  served  an  earlier  day  as  a  theoretical 


2  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

foundation  for  education.  If  use  and  habit  could  account  for  the 
evolution  of  organic  differences  in  the  animal  world,  how  clear 
the  inference  that  human  progress  likewise  must  flow  from  a 
training  which,  persisted  in  generation  after  generation,  yields 
cumulative  powers  and  aptitudes  of  the  greatest  advantage  to 
posterity.  There  are  still  many  individuals  who  receive  the 
statement  that  no  amount  of  musical,  mathematical,  legal,  or 
other  special  training  on  the  part  of  parents  will  improve  the 
offspring  one  iota  with  a  lingering  incredulity.  But  the  biologists 
gave  and  the  biologists  have  taken  away  this  illusory  hope  of 
a  training  which  shall  be  cumulative.  Weissmann  and  his  school 
began  their  assaults  upon  this  comfortable  doctrine  in  the  eighties 
of  the  last  century,  and  today  little  or  nothing  of  it  remains.^ 

It  should  be  clear  that  this  earlier,  pre-Darwinian  concep- 
tion of  the  effects  of  use  and  disuse  laid  a  much  greater  emphasis 
upon  environment,  including  training  or  education,  than  it  did 
upon  heredity,  and  through  all  the  long  campaign  by  which  the 
Darwinian  doctrine  of  natural  selection  won  its  way  in  the  world 
of  science,  this  supremacy  of  the  environment  was  not  seriously 
threatened.  It  was  in  fact,  variability  and  selection,  not  heredity, 
upon  which  the  emphasis  was  laid;  the  latter  was  taken  more 
or  less  for  granted.  The  variable  organism  in  the  face  of  a  por- 
tentous environment  was  turned  now  to  death,  now  to  Hfe,  with 
a  constant  survival  of  individuals  fit  to  do  business  under  existing 
conditions. 

It  is  hardly  necessary  to  point  out  that  the  general  conception 
of  organic  evolution  clarified  by  Darwin's  great  work,  and  includ- 
ing the  idea  of  the  struggle  for  existence,  was  eagerly  appropriated 
by  the  sciences  of  human  society.  History,  jurisprudence,  politi- 
cal economy,  and  ethics  all  underwent  considerable  modifications 

'  "  If  we  make  a  jack-o-lantern  out  of  a  pumpkin  and  afterwards  plant  the  seeds, 
we  do  not  expect  a  crop  of  jack-o-lanterns.  Repeat  the  cutting  and  plant  the  seeds 
through  fifty  generations  of  pumpkins;  not  a  jack-o-lantern  will  be  grown.  The 
inheritance  is  from  the  seed,  not  from  the  pumpkin. 

"The  human  seed  is  equally  unailected  by  externals  which  do  not  damage  the 
germ  itself.  Life's  experiences  must  be  impressed  anew  upon  every  generation  as 
it  comes  along,  and  a  thousand  years  of  external  impressions  will  not  add  or  subtract 
or  improve  or  corrupt  one  hereditary  characteristic  in  the  germ  plasm." — Seth  K. 
Humphrey,  Mankind,  p.  12. 


HEREDITY  AND  OPPORTUNITY  3 

in  viewpoint  and  method.  And  of  sociology  it  may  be  said  that 
it  has  been  extravagant  in  its  professions  of  indebtedness  to 
biology. 

Many  absurdities  in  social  theory  have  masqueraded  in  the 
borrowed  trappings  of  biological  conceptions.  The  so-called 
biological  analogy  is  a  case  in  point.  Much  more  pernicious 
was  the  attempt  to  base  an  ethics  of  rapacity  and  greed  upon 
what  was  ignorantly  called  social  Darwinism.  It  was  apparently 
overlooked  by  some  of  those  who  glorified  the  struggle  for  exist- 
ence that  a  genuine  re-enactment  of  Nature's  plan,  far  from 
confirming  satisfied  classes  in  their  hereditary  possessions  and 
privileges,  would  cancel  at  a  stroke  all  of  the  rules  of  civilized 
competition,  overthrow  private  property  and  stable  matrimony 
(for  neither  may  be  said  to  be  precisely  natural  in  a  biological 
sense),  and  bring  back  Chaos  and  old  Night.  The  world  has 
seen  much  of  such  ruthlessness  of  late  in  the  course  of  the  world- 
war  and  its  revolutionary  sequels,  but  considering  the  world  at 
large,  there  appears  to  be  little  disposition  to  identify  the  primi- 
tive with  the  admirable,  or  to  regard  the  rule  of  brute  force  as 
adequate  to  the  ethical  requirements  of  civilization. 

The  work  of  Darwin  will  continue  for  many  decades  to  mark 
epochs  in  the  history  of  biology.  Since  the  publication  of  his 
Origin  of  Species  in  1859,  the  most  important  development  has 
been  the  gradual  emergence  of  a  doctrine  of  inheritance,  and 
during  the  past  dozen  years  certainly  no  influence  has  swept 
over  the  field  of  social  thinking  comparable  with  the  idea  of 
heredity.  As  early  as  1865,  in  advance  of  the  recent  researches 
in  genetics,  Francis  Galton,  the  distinguished  founder  of  eugenics, 
pubHshed  two  articles  on  "Hereditary  Talent  and  Character." 
His  Hereditary  Genius  appeared  in  1869,  to  be  followed  by  a 
long  list  of  pubUcations  in  support  of  the  general  thesis  that  man 
deserves  more  careful  breeding. 

The  work  of  Weismann,  whose  Germplasm  was  published  in 
1885,  has  led  at  length  to  the  almost  complete  overthrow  of  the 
doctrine  of  the  inheritance  of  traits  acquired  by  the  individual 
through  training  or  experience  and  has  focused  attention  upon 
a  new  and  fascinating  problem — the  mechanism  of  heredity.     In 


4  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

1900  the  rediscovery  of  the  lost  investigations  of  the  Austrian 
abbot,  Gregor  Mendel,  now  acclaimed  founder  of  the  modern 
science  of  heredity,  once  more  drew  attention  to  the  fact  that  a 
very  important  body  of  biological  knowledge  was  in  process  of 
formulation. 

Much  obscurity  still  envelopes  the  entire  subject  of  the  in- 
heritance of  mental  traits  which  appear  so  complicated  that  only 
the  long-continued  efforts  of  psychologists,  as  well  as  geneticists, 
will  avail  to  discover  the  unit  characters  which  lie  at  the  base  of 
individual  human  nature.  Without  waiting  for  re-enforcements 
from  that  quarter,  however,  the  eugenic  army  has  already  taken 
the  field,  planting  its  standards  at  every  point  of  vantage,  and 
issuing  proclamations  to  the  inhabitants  of  the  land  somewhat 
in  this  tenor: 

Whereas,  In  the  course  of  social  evolution,  defective  and  subnormal 
individuals,  whom  Nature  never  intended  to  spare,  are  being  harbored  in 
large  numbers  under  the  doubtful  auspices  of  organized  charity,  city  hospitals, 
almshouses,  and  orphanages,  and 

Whereas,  The  conspicuously  able  and  successful  classes  of  the  population 
are  conspicuous  also  for  the  fewness  of  their  offspring  while  the  obscure 
multiply  exceedingly. 

Therefore  be  it  incorporated  in  the  articles  of  religion,  and  in  morals 
and  law  that  the  defective  and  inferior  stocks  shall  by  surgery,  segrega- 
tion, and  sentiment  be  estopped  from  such  excessive  fertility,  and  the 
capable  and  successful  shall  be  enjoined  to  marry  prudently  and  to  bring 
forth  offspring  with  great  fecundity. 

So  say  the  eugenists  in  chorus  and  a  modern  Cassandra  arising 
among  them  represents  even  the  remotest  country  districts  as 
in  process  of  being  denuded  of  all  exceptional  ability  by  the 
inevitable  lure  of  ambition. 

City,  college,  factory,  business,  are  within  a  day's  journey  of  all  but  a  few. 
No  superior  man,  restless  in  his  too  meagre  surroundings,  is  beyond  hearing 
of  the  call  to  self-development;  then  why  stick  to  the  slow  business  of  race 
development  ?  The  weak  brother  remains  behind  to  multiply,  while  the 
strong  rises  to  a  position  of  greater  usefulness  and  comparative  infertility. 
No  sooner  does  inborn  capacity  show  itself  in  the  remotest  corner  than  it 
is  whisked  away  to  "make  good."' 

'  Scth  K.  Humphrey,  Mankind,  p.  91. 


HEREDITY  AND  OPPORTUNITY  5 

In  general  it  may  be  said  that  there  is  little  or  no  diflference 
of  opinion  as  to  the  desirability  of  restraining  the  multiplication 
of  individuals  with  serious  transmissible  defects  of  mind  and 
body.  Here  and  there  a  voice  has  been  raised  in  protest.  One 
writer,  Gertrude  E.  Hall,  in  Survey,  October  6,  191 7,  has  even 
represented  the  feeble-minded  as  turning  upon  the  hurried,  over- 
working, overworrying,  "normal"  individual  with  the  assertion 
that  the  steady  nerves  and  childlike  mind  of  the  moron  may 
yet  be  needed  to  cool  the  fever  in  the  blood  of  a  race  consuming 
itself  in  frenzied  neurasthenic  competition  for  place  and  power. 
This,  of  course,  is  far  from  orthodox  and  may  even  have  been 
offered  in  the  spirit  of  a  remark  which  has  been  attributed,  I 
think,  to  Cromwell  when  addressing  a  group  of  theologians,  he 
said  in  effect:  "I  beseech  you  brethren  in  the  bowels  of  the  Lord 
that  you  consider  the  possibility  that  you  may  be  mistaken." 
Science,  we  ought  to  remind  ourselves,  has  its  dogmatisms  as 
well  as  theology,  although,  fortunately  for  the  truth,  they  die 
much  younger,  for  it  is  of  the  nature  of  science  to  foster  a  high 
infant  mortaHty  among  ideas. 

It  is  not  defectives  alone,  however,  who  raise  apprehension 
in  the  breasts  of  the  bio-sociologists.  The  whole  undistinguished 
mass  of  the  lowly  and  obscure  are  also  under  suspicion.  They 
also  threaten  racial  values,  for  they  are  more  fertile  than  the 
sophisticated  and  successful,  and  they  will  in  time  people  the 
earth  with  a  race  of  uniform  mediocrity.  Two  contentions  are 
here  involved:  one  relates  to  the  assumed  racial  inferiority  of 
the  obscure  and  the  other  to  their  disproportionate  rate  of  increase. 
As  to  the  latter  point  it  should  be  noted  that  another  generation 
or  so  will  most  probably  see  universal  old-age  pensions  in  some 
form,  the  effect  of  which  will  be  to  undermine  the  traditional 
idea  that  children  must  be  numerous  in  order  to  provide  parents 
with  adequate  insurance  against  old  age.  This  will  weaken  one 
of  the  sentimental  supports  of  large  families  among  the  lowly. 
Another  change  which  is  probably  impending  is  the  more  and 
more  general  acceptance  of  some  form  of  reasoned  limitation  of 
the  size  of  families.  If  our  racial  integrity,  therefore,  can  be 
maintained  for  a  generation  or  two  longer,  some  of  the  fears 


6  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

obsessing  the  biological  well-wishers  of  humanity  at  the  opening 
of  the  twentieth  century  may  prove  groundless. 

The  previous  question  remains  for  discussion.  It  concerns 
the  inferiority  of  the  obscure  as  compared  with  the  conspicuously 
successful.  The  matter  might  be  stated  thus:  To  what  extent 
is  the  arrangement  of  society  in  stratified  social  classes — an  ar- 
rangement once  held  to  be  as  fundamental  as  the  stratifications 
of  the  old  red  sandstone  itself — to  what  extent  are  social  strati- 
fications based  upon  personal  merit  ?  The  commonest  assumption 
is  that  the  ofl&cial,  professional,  and  successful  mercantile  elements 
in  any  population  constitute  a  sort  of  elite,  distinguished  from 
the  underlying  layers  of  the  population  by  superior  capacity.  It 
is  a  fair  inference  that  when  men  run  a  race,  those  who  arrive 
first  at  the  goal  are  the  best  runners,  and  at  first  glance  there 
may  appear  to  be  small  question  that  a  classification  of  the  popu- 
lation according  to  eminence  is  roughly  accurate  as  a  classification 
of  abilities. 

Without  prejudicing  the  inquiry  which  is  to  follow,  this  much 
may  safely  be  asserted  at  once :  If  an  entire  population  is  educated 
to  the  limit  of  its  varying  abilities  and  all  individuals  are  en- 
couraged and  enabled  to  aspire  to  any  congenial  task  or  position 
not  denied  by  limitations  of  personal  ability,  then  a  near  approxi- 
mation to  the  conditions  of  the  foot  race  would  be  realized.  Such 
a  society  would  be  not  unlike  Plato's  Republic,  where  the  eminent 
are  also  the  wisest  and  the  best.  On  the  other  hand,  in  a  popu- 
lation stratified  into  non-intermarrying  castes,  which  coincide 
with  privileged  or  handicapped  political  and  economic  classes, 
there  is  the  minimum  approach  to  the  conditions  of  a  foot  race, 
and  in  such  a  society  obscurity  and  eminence  may  have  little 
relation  to  intrinsic  personal  abilities.  The  purpose  of  this 
paper  is  to  examine  the  actual  conditions  of  individual  achieve- 
ment in  our  own  time  and  nation. 

Two  further  truths,  which  need  scarcely  more  than  statement, 
should  be  set  forth.  First,  men  everywhere  and  always  are  found 
to  differ  greatly  from  individual  to  individual;  it  is  not,  however, 
merely  that  they  are  obviously  unequal  in  respect  to  every  human 


HEREDITY  AND  OPPORTUNITY  7 

quality,  but  each  personality  is  unique,  in  literal  fact  the  only 
one  of  the  precise  kind  ever  struck  off  in  the  fortuitous  comming- 
ling of  innumerable  germinal  cells  of  innumerable  ancestors. 
"Every  living  being,"  says  a  leading  biologist,  "appears  on  care- 
ful examination  to  be  the  first  and  last  of  its  identical  kind."  * 

The  second  truth  is  less  generally  recognized;  it  is  that  in- 
ferior groups,  so  called,  usually  turn  out  to  have  been  disadvan- 
taged groups,  and  conversely,  superior  groups,  so  called,  usually 
turn  out  to  have  had  superior  advantages.  One  obvious  excep- 
tion to  this  rule  consists  of  inferior  groups  whose  character  is 
the  result  of  some  selective  factor,  e.g.,  a  class  of  repeaters  in  a 
graded  school  or  possibly  a  group  of  paupers  in  an  almshouse. 
When,  however,  selection  of  the  membership  of  groups  is  largely 
accidental,  it  is  rash  to  assume  any  intrinsic  inferiority  in  one 
group  as  compared  with  another. 

Before  entering  upon  an  analysis  of  the  conditions  determining 
personal  achievement,  some  interest  may  be  lent  to  the  inquiry 
by  adverting  briefly  to  several  groups  once  viewed  as  inferior, 
but  latterly  regarded  more  and  more  as  differing  in  cross-section 
but  sHghtly  from  the  general  population.  These  groups  are 
women,  non-European  races,  decadent  communities  and  criminals. 
I  shall  discuss  them  briefly  in  inverse  order. 

It  was  not  many  years  ago  that  criminologists  were  describing 
the  multitudinous  abnormalities  of  the  criminal  type  of  man,  and 
even  today  the  idea  is  still  current  that  between  the  normal  man 
and  the  criminal,  Nature  herself  has  interposed  a  great  gulf. 
If  we  make  exception  of  mental  defectives,  who  naturally  find 
it  difficult  if  not  impossible  to  conform  to  a  society  in  which  they 
ought  never  to  be  left  at  large,  nothing  could  be  farther  from 
the  truth.  The  painstaking  statistical  researches  of  Dr.  Goring, 
the  great-hearted  intuitions  of  Osborne,  the  shrewd  observations 
of  Dr.  Devon,  and  the  testimony  of  a  multitude  of  other  competent 
students  confirm  the  view  that  criminals,  in  so  far  as  they  are 
not  mere  imbeciles  who  never  should  have  been  born,  much  less 
left  at  large,  are  surprisingly  like  the  rest  of  us.     Dr.  Devon,  to 

'  Conklin,  Heredity  and  Environment,  p.  213. 


8  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

call  only  one  witness  after  long  experience  in  His  Majesty's  prison 
at  Glasgow,  writes:* 

For  sixteen  years  I  have  been  looking  for  the  offender  of  the  books  and 
I  have  not  met  him.  The  offender  familiar  to  me  is  not  a  type,  but  a  man  or 
a  woman  and  we  shall  never  know  nor  deserve  to  know  him  till  we  are  con- 
tent to  study  him,  not  as  a  naturalist  studies  a  beetle,  but  as  a  man  studies 
his  neighbor. 

To  say  that  as  wolves  breed  wolves,  criminals  breed  criminals  is  nonsense 
and  mischievous  nonsense.  As  canaries  breed  canaries,  do  poets  breed 
poets? 

Criminals  are  men  and  women  who  have  gone  wrong,  not  necessarily 
because  of  the  possession  of  certain  powers  which  they  have  inherited,  but 
because  these  powers  have  been  used  in  a  wrong  direction.  They  come  from 
all  classes  and  there  is  nothing  to  show  that  if  their  children  were  taken  from 
them  early  in  life  and  brought  up  in  favorable  surroundings  they  would 
take  to  crime,  but  there  is  an  abundance  of  evidence  on  the  other  side. 

A  second  social  group  frequently  diagnosed  as  essentially 
inferior  to  other  groups  is  the  population  of  decadent  rural 
communities  such  as  may  be  found  in  abundance  in  northern 
New  England.     The  writer  has  elsewhere  pointed  out: 

In  appraising  communities,  as  in  judging  individuals,  there  is  grave 
danger  of  imputing  more  to  racial  deterioration  than  the  facts  warrant.  Not 
long  since  some  of  our  social  investigators  were  for  pronouncing  from  a  third 
to  a  half  of  our  juvenile  delinquents  feeble-minded.  But  the  influence  of 
physical  defect  and  of  an  untoward  social  environment  is  coming  to  be  better 
understood  and  the  emphasis  is  accordingly  being  corrected.  Is  it  not  prob- 
able that  the  trouble  with  backward  communities  is  less  germinal  than 
psychic,  and  the  remedies  called  for  not  merely  eugenic,  but  the  application 
in  particular  of  an  economic  and  psychic  tonic  ? 

A  sort  of  moral  and  civic  paralysis  follows  upon  habituation  to  failure, 
and  these  communities,  having  seen  themselves  lose  population  and  prestige 
for  half  a  century  or  more,  pass  through  the  stage  of  self-pity  to  one  of  "recon- 
ciliation" and  complete  indifference.  Proponents  of  new  ways  are  met  by 
a  universal  skepticism  and  are  overborne  by  the  recital  of  similar  attempts 
which  failed  in  the  eighties  or  nineties.  In  short,  such  communities  are 
obsessed  by  the  fixed  idea  "It's  no  use."  A  farmer  and  his  family  living 
today  on  a  New  England  farm  may  be  racially  as  fit  as  the  people  who  first 
put  plow-share  to  sod  in  that  region,  and  they  may  live  loo  per  cent  more 
comfortably  than  the  pioneers  who  preceded  them,  and  yet  be  marked,  and 
their  whole  community  with  them,  with  the  mental  stigmata  of  defeat.     In 

'  See  The  Criminal  and  the  Community,  pp.  19,  48. 


HEREDITY  AND  OPPORTUNITY  9 

other  words,  a  perfectly  good  region  inhabited  by  perfectly  good  people  may 
become  discouraged,  despondent,  decadent,  owing  to  nothing  more  serious 
than  the  inheritance  of  obsolete  traditions  of  agriculture  and  of  social  rela- 
tionships, and  to  discouragement  due  to  a  long  continued  shrinkage  of  pop- 
ulation. 

But  just  as  a  discouraged  and  morally  decadent  individual  may  come 
back  to  life  and  to  achievement  through  a  personal  crisis  of  some  sort — 
the  kindling  of  a  new  friendship,  religious  conversion,  or  the  breaking  out 
of  war — so  a  rural  community  which  is  given  over  to  reminiscence  and  lethargy 
may,  by  a  proper  adjustment  of  its  economic  life  and  a  proper  stimulus 
to  its  civic  imagination,  begin  once  more  to  function  with  as  much  exhilaration 
as  the  very  immigrants  and  pioneers  themselves.^ 

A  third  group  or  series  of  groups  heretofore  adjudged  our 
inferiors  consists  of  the  primitive  peoples  and  indeed  of  nearly 
all  of  the  non- Aryan  races.  The  naive  assumptions  of  ancient 
chosen  peoples  who  represented  themselves  as  fertile  oases  in  a 
human  desert  of  Gentiles,  barbarians,  and  savages,  find  their 
counterpart  in  our  time  in  the  orthodox  dogma  regarding  the 
negro,  the  views  of  but  a  few  years  ago  regarding  MongoUans, 
and  the  amusing  assertions  of  racial  superiority  put  forth  by  half 
the  races  of  Europe,  not  only  in  behalf  of  their  common  Aryan 
stock,  but  of  the  particular  blends  of  that  stock  which  each  asso- 
ciates with  its  own  territory,  flag,  or  mother-tongue. 

A  recent  writer  puts  the  matter  thus: 

Cultured  man  has  always  regarded  primitive  man  as  inferior.  Europeans 
have  always  assumed  that  the  white  race  was  endowed  by  nature  with  a 
superior  order  of  intelligence.  This  commonly  accepted  explanation,  however, 
fails  to  explain.  The  assumption  of  superior  mental  capacity  on  the  part  of 
the  white  man  rests  upon  the  tacit  assumption  that  those  peoples  are  superior 
which  are  most  advanced  in  civilization. 

It  is  necessary  to  distinguish  between  the  possibilities  inherent  in  a 
people  and  their  actual  attainments. 

....  the  consensus  of  scholarly  opinion  at  the  present  time  seems  to 
be  to  regard  the  backward  races,  not  only  as  not  having  been  proven  to  be 
inferior  in  mental  ability,  but  as  being,  in  so  far  at  least  as  their  inherited 
mental  capacity  is  concerned,  substantially  equal  to  the  culture  races 

Boaz  ....  holds  that  the  differences  in  civilization  are  essentially  a 
matter  of  time  and  are  sufficiently  explained  by  the  laws  of  chance  and  the 
general  course  of  historical  events. 

^Proceedings  of  the  American  Sociological  Society,  1916,  pp.  72-73. 


lo  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

Thomas  would  seem  to  find  the  fundamental  explanation  of  the  difference 
in  the  mental  life  of  two  groups  is  that  the  run  of  attention  has  been  along 
different  lines  and  in  the  emergence  at  fortunate  intervals  of  great  personalities. 
"The  most  significant  fact  for  Aryan  development  is  the  emergence  among 
the  Greeks  of  a  number  of  eminent  men  who  developed  logic,  the  experi- 
mental method,  and  philosophic  interest,  and  fixed  in  their  group  the  habit 
of  looking  behind  the  incident  for  the  general  law."  ....  It  would  be  a 
simple  matter  to  multiply  authorities  who  hold  that  in  inherent  capacity 
there  is  an  essential  mental  equality  among  races  and  that  whatever  differences 
are  manifested  are  explainable  solely  on  the  grounds  of  unequal  opportunity.' 

This  view  is  held  not  wholly  without  dissent,  of  course,  but  it  is 
very  significant  that,  whereas  formerly  it  could  hardly  have 
received  a  hearing,  it  now  commands  the  support  of  a  prepon- 
derant weight  of  scholarly  opinion. 

A  final  analogy  may  be  sought  in  the  case  of  women.  The 
dogma  of  female  inferiority,  venerable  as  history  itself,  is  in 
process  of  dissipation  before  our  eyes.  Like  the  illusions  of 
a  striking  and  typical  difference  marking  off  lawbreakers  from 
law  keepers,  decadent  from  vigorous  communities,  or  white  from 
darker-hued  races,  this  illusion  is  also  turning  out  to  have  arisen 
from  fixing  the  attention  exclusively  on  superficial  differences 
which  disguise  the  fundamental  human  identities  lying  much 
nearer  to  the  core  of  reality. 

These  examples  lead  one  to  inquire  whether  the  obscure, 
from  whom  the  eugenists  anticipate  so  numerous  and  dreadful 
a  progeny,  are  in  reality  so  inferior  in  endowment  to  the  much 
lamented  low-birth-rate  classes,  variously  eulogized  in  the  persons 
of  officials,  business  men,  teachers,  professional  men,  and  college 
graduates. 

Donald  Hankey  writes  in  A  Student  in  Arms, 

One  sees  men  as  God  sees  them,  apart  from  externals  such  as  manner 
and  intonation.  A  night  in  a  bombing  party  shows  you  Jim  Smith  as  a 
man  of  splendid  courage.  A  shortage  of  rations  reveals  his  wonderful  un- 
selfishness. One  danger  and  discomfort  after  another  you  share  in  common 
till  you  love  him  as  a  brother.  Out  there,  if  anyone  dared  to  remind  you 
that  Jim  was  only  a  fireman  while  you  were  a  bank  clerk,  you  would  give 
him  one  in  the  eye  to  go  on  with.  You  have  learned  to  know  a  man  when 
you  sec  one  and  to  value  him. 

'  E.  B.  Reuter,  "The  Superiority  of  the  Mulatto,"  American  Journal  of  Sociology, 
July,  191 7,  pp.  87-88,  92-93. 


HEREDITY  AND  OPPORTUNITY  1 1 

War  and  science  are  alike  in  this  that  each  makes  necessary  a 
constant  revision  of  values. 

These  preliminaries  completed,  we  stand  on  the  threshold  of 
a  great  problem — that  of  the  factors  which  condition  human 
achievement.  It  is  necessary  first  to  separate  so  far  as  possible 
the  hereditary  elements  from  the  environmental  and  then  to 
disentangle  a  few  of  the  strands  which  lose  themselves  in  the 
confused  factor  of  environment. 

The  following  topics  will  accordingly  be  discussed  in  sub- 
sequent sections:  II.  Heredity  and  Achievement;  III.  The 
Family  Environment;  IV.  The  Social  Level  of  Opportunity; 
V.  Social  Situations  and  Psychical  Tone;  VI.  The  Social  Verdict. 

II.     HEREDITY   AND   ACHIEVEMENT 

By  the  hereditary  factor  in  achievement  is  meant  the  original 
capital  with  which  the  individual  begins  his  trading  with  life 
some  nine  months  before  he  is  born.  It  consists  as  a  matter  of 
fact  of  a  single  cell. 

Although  relatively  undifferentiated  in  structure,  the  germ  cells  are  so 
marvelously  organized  that  in  the  compass  of  less  than  one-hundredth  of  an 
inch,  the  human  oosperm  contains  the  determining  elements  of  all  the  physical 
and  mental  traits  of  the  prospective  individual.  In  so  small  a  boat,  or,  as  it 
has  been  weU  put,  "across  so  narrow  a  bridge,"  is  aU  the  possible  glory  and 
beauty  of  life  borne  to  us.  Professor  Walter,  in  his  Genetics,  weU  remarks, 
"the  wonder  grows  that  so  small  a  bridge  can  stand  such  an  enormous  traffic."' 

Whatever  is  implicit  in  this  single  cell  constitutes  for  the  forth- 
coming individual,  heredity;  whatever  befalls  that  cell  or  any  of 
its  daughter-cells  in  the  next  nine  months  and  seventy  years  is 
environment. 

It  has  already  been  remarked  that  individuals  are  not  only 
imequal  in  their  hereditary  endowment  but  that  each  is  also 
unique  in  regard  to  it.  One  interesting  qualification  ought  to 
be  made  at  this  point.  In  the  human  species  about  one  birth 
in  a  hundred  consists  of  twins  and  about  one  pair  of  twins  in  six 
is  produced  from  a  single  fertilized  egg  cell.  Such  twins  are  called 
uniovular,   identical,   or  dupHcate  twins.     As  Professor   Smith, 

'  Erville  B.  Woods,  "The  Subnormal  Child,"  Educational  Review,  December,  1915, 
p.  481. 


12  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

writing  in  Science,  points  out,  "in  duplicate  twins  Nature  tries 
for  us  the  important  experiment  of  making  two  individuals  out 
of  the  same  germ  plasm."  Such  twins  are  always  of  the  same 
sex,  and  apparently  of  precisely  the  same  germinal  constitution. 
It  is  as  if  two  vessels  were  built  from  a  single  set  of  blueprints, 
for  in  the  germ  plasm  are  written  the  specifications  of  every 
organ,  tendency,  and  characteristic  of  the  prospective  individual. 
According  to  the  writer  just  mentioned,  a  study  of  the  palm  and 
sole  markings  of  such  identical  twins  affords  a  clue  to  the  extent 
to  which  Nature  lays  down  in  the  germ  plasm  the  specifications 
of  future  growth. 

Since,  by  a  comparison  of  the  prints,  it  may  be  seen  that  the  resemblance 
is  confined  to  the  general  pattern  while  there  is  no  especial  resemblance  in 
the  individual  ridges  (Gallon's  "Minutiae"),  we  arrive  at  what  may  be 
called  the  limit  of  germinal  control,  i.e.,  the  point  where  the  directive  force 
felt  in  the  development  ceases  to  act,  leaving  further  details  to  other  forces.^ 

Heredity  apparently  draws  the  outline  whether  of  a  starfish  or 
of  a  man,  specifies  in  a  general  way  the  bodily  pattern,  the  archi- 
tecture of  the  various  organs,  the  type  of  reactions  with  which 
they  are  to  respond  to  the  environment  and  the  various  phases 
of  their  neural  and  psychical  dispositions.  But  beyond  this 
point  Nature  leaves  a  bit  of  discretion,  so  to  speak,  to  the  exi- 
gencies of  experience  itself,  to  those  byplays  of  competing  stimu- 
lations eternally  beating  in  upon  us  which  we  humor  ourselves 
by  calling  the  freedom  of  the  will. 

From  quite  another  field  confirmatory  evidence  is  adduced 
in  support  of  this  \dew  of  the  limits  of  hereditary  determination. 
I  quote  from  Robert  H.  Gault:^ 

....  the  disposition  today  among  those  who  have  given  most  atten- 
tion to  the  experimental  study  of  the  question  [i.e.,  of  instinct]  among  lower 
animals  is  that  there  are  but  few  instincts,  properly  speaking,  and  that  these 
are  less  specific  than  generalized.  They  are  natural  dispositions  that  deter- 
mine unthin  wide  limits  what  habits  we  shall  develop,  assuming  that  circum- 
stances arc  favorable. 

"Even  the  singing  of  birds  is  a  highly  modifiable  instinct,  or, 
as  I  prefer  to  believe,  a  complex  habit  built  upon  a  generalized 

'Sciincc,  XXVII,  451. 

'  "Psychology  in  Social  Relations,"  American  Journal  of  Sociology,  XXII,  737  ff. 


HEREDITY  AND  OPPORTUNITY  13 

instinctive  basis."  A  ''crucial  experiment"  in  this  connection 
was  that  of  Conradi,  "who  undertook  to  put  a  group  of  English 
sparrows  to  school.  Canaries  were  elected  to  serve  as  school- 
masters. The  sparrows  were  reared  in  the  same  room  with  the 
canaries  severely  isolated  from  others  of  their  kind.  The  regular 
sparrow  chirp  developed  at  the  proper  time,  but  the  birds  soon 
lost  that  expression  and  assumed  the  peep  that  is  characteristic 
of  the  young  canary."  Even  a  moderately  successful  imitation 
of  the  canary's  song  appeared  in  time.  "Observations  of  this 
sort  go  far  to  justify  the  hypothesis  that  all  our  instincts  are 
undefined  motives  and  that  what  appears  to  be  specializations 
are  habits  resting  upon  an  instinctive  basis — habits  that  are 
developed    by    repeated    responses    to    environmental    stimuli." 

From  such  considerations  one  may  appreciate  that  the  mar- 
velous predeterminations  which  constitute  heredity  are  no  more 
marvelous  than  the  almost  indefinite  flexibility  of  life  in  the 
presence  of  its  world.  Whatever  a  man's  heredity,  it  always  bears 
a  contingent  character — life  and  conduct  should  be  talked  of  in 
terms  of  tendency,  never  in  terms  of  rigid  inevitability. 

Inasmuch  as  this  is  a  study  primarily  of  the  social  environ- 
ment, it  would  lead  too  far  afield  to  attempt  any  extended  analysis 
of  the  part  played  in  achievement  by  specific  inherited  qualities. 
It  is  probable  that  certain  conspicuous  traits  serve  among  primi- 
tive as  well  as  civilized  peoples,  to  mark  a  man  off  for  distinction 
and  usually  for  leadership.  Professor  Hutton  Webster  in  a  paper 
read  before  the  American  Sociological  Society  in  191 7,  after 
sketching  a  number  of  biographies  of  men  eminent  in  the  annals 
of  primitive  peoples,  concludes  that  "strength  of  body  and  strength 
of  will,  unusual  intelligence,  a  persuasive  tongue,  great  energy, 
ambition,  and  force  of  character  are  the  personal  traits  which 
raise  a  man  above  his  fellows  and  constitute  the  leader."  It 
would  not  be  difficult  to  prove  that  the  leaders  of  civilized  peoples, 
not  only  in  poHtical  life,  but  the  great  executives  of  the  business 
world  are  very  often  notable  for  their  physical  endurance  and,  as 
Gowin  has  shown  statistically,  are  of  greater  physical  bulk  than 
men  in  subordinate  positions.  Strength  of  will,  particularly  in 
the  form  of  pertinacity,  unusual  intelligence,  including  a  highly 


14  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

developed  sense  of  economic  values  and  an  incisive  freshness 
of  view  which  approaches  eccentricity,  a  persuasive  tongue, 
great  energy  and  initiative,  ambition,  highly  developed  public- 
mindedness,  and  force  of  character  which  sums  up  many  virtues, 
are  all  of  great  importance  in  accounting  for  achievement  on 
the  hereditary  side  among  civilized  races. 

The  insoluble  problem  of  how  much  influence  shall  be  attrib- 
uted to  the  hereditary  elements  in  achievement  as  compared 
with  the  elements  due  to  environment  need  not  long  detain  us. 
It  is  as  futile  as  the  equally  intelligent  inquiry  into  the  relative 
importance  of  having  eggs  laid  and  having  them  hatched.  Both 
processes  are  quite  indispensable  to  the  continuation  of  the 
race  of  hens.  Much  has  been  said  with  reference  to  the  claims 
on  the  part  of  mother  and  foster-mother  respectively  to  the  finally 
emergent  chick,  but  science  has  not  been  enriched  by  either  of 
these  inquiries.  Heredity  signifies  as  a  matter  of  fact  a  deter- 
minate mode  of  development  and  of  behavior;  development  is 
possible  for  the  organism  only  by  the  exchange  of  substance  with 
a  material  environment  and  behavior  is  possible  only  in  the 
presence  of  stimuli  originating  in  an  environment.  Environment 
is  equally  without  significance  unless  there  be  first  the  vital  and 
sensitive  organism  with  all  its  unfolding  and  reacting  implicit 
within  it. 

There  are,  of  course,  considerable  differences  in  individuals 
in  regard  to  spontaneity  or  passivity  in  the  presence  of  their 
environment.  Some  appear  to  meet  Ufe  more  than  halfway; 
others,  like  General  Grant,  require  a  volcano  or  a  miHtary 
cataclysm  to  wake  them  up.  I  cannot  refrain  from  quoting  from 
two  letters  which  Mark  Twain  wrote  to  his  wife  in  1879  from 
Chicago  where  he  was  attending  a  "reunion  of  the  great  com- 
manders" of  the  Civil  War.^ 

What  an  iron  man  Grant  is!  He  sat  facing  the  house,  with  his  right 
leg  crossed  over  his  left  and  his  right  boot-sole  tilted  up  at  an  angle,  and  his 
left  hand  and  arm  reposing  on  the  arm  of  his  chair — you  note  that  position  ? 
Well,  when  glowing  references  were  made  to  other  grandees  on  the  stage, 
those  grandees  always  showed  a  trifle  of  nervous  consciousness,  and  as  these 

'  Mark  Twain's  Letters,  edited  by  Albert  Bigelow  Paine,  I,  368-69  and  372. 


HEREDITY  AND  OPPORTUNITY  15 

references  came  frequently,  the  nervous  change  of  position  and  attitude 
were  also  frequent.  But  Grant!  he  was  under  a  tremendous  and  ceaseless 
bombardment  of  praise  and  gratul^tion,  but  as  true  as  I'm  sitting  here  he 
never  moved  a  muscle  of  his  body  for  a  single  instant  during  the  thirty  min- 
utes!   You  could  have  played  him  on    a   stranger   for   an   eflSgy 

At  two  o'clock  in  the  morning  Mark  Twain  himself,  having  been 
placed  last -on  the  program  to  "hold  the  crowd"  rose  to  dehver 
the  fifteenth  speech  of  the  evening.  I  quote  from  the  second 
letter: 

And  do  you  know,  General  Grant  sat  through  fourteen  speeches  like 
a  graven  image,  but  I  fetched  him!  I  broke  him  up  utterly!  He  told  me 
he  laughed  till  the  tears  came  and  every  bone  in  his  body  ached.  (And  do 
you  know  the  biggest  part  of  the  success  of  the  speech  lay  in  the  fact  that 
the  audience  saw  that  for  once  in  his  life  he  had  been  knocked  out  of  his 
iron  serenity.) 

The  author  of  these  letters  is  not  noted  for  the  historicity  of 
his  episodes,  but  his  comment  upon  Grant  in  these  intimate  letters 
to  his  wife  appears  consistent  with  what  we  know  of  a  man  who 
was  sinking  visibly  into  pitiful  failure  in  the  midst  of  a  peaceful 
and  civilized  environment,  but  whom  the  thunders  of  war  incited 
to  a  great  and  masterful  leadership. 

This  difference  between  the  spontaneous  and  the  passive  type 
is  clearly  stated  by  Galton  in  Noteworthy  Families  :^ 

The  force  that  impels  toward  noteworthy  deeds  is  an  innate  disposition 
in  some  men,  depending  less  on  circumstances  than  in  others.  They  are 
like  ships  which  carry  an  auxiliary  steam  power,  capable  of  moving  in  a  dead 
calm  and  against  adverse  winds.  Others  are  like  the  ordinary  sailing  ships 
of  the  present  day — they  are  stationary  in  a  calm,  but  can  make  some  way 
towards  their  destination  under  almost  any  wind.  Without  a  stimulus 
these  men  are  idle,  but  almost  any  kind  of  stimulus  suffices  to  set  them  in 
action.  Others,  again,  are  like  Arab  dhows,  that  do  little  more  than  drift 
before  the  monsoon  or  other  wind;  but  then  they  can  go  fast. 

Another  charactistic  of  hereditary  excellence  which  should  be 
noted  is  the  extreme  delicacy  of  the  accidental  combinations  of 
as  yet  largely  unknown  unit  characters,  which  go  to  make  up 
the  individual  endowment  of  geniuses  and  persons  of  great  talent. 
Although  they  get  nothing  from  Nature  except  by  way  of  descent 

'  Op.  cit.,  p.  xri. 


i6  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

from  their  parents  and  their  parents'  parents,  yet  the  virtues  re- 
siding in  them  are  in  the  nature  after  all  of  a  throw  of  the  dice 
or  a  momentary  posture  of  the  kaleidoscope,  not  likely  to  be 
ever  repeated. 

Galton  himself  ventures  the  opinion  that  "the  highest  order 
of  mind  results  from  a  fortuitous  mixture  of  incongruous  con- 
stituents,'" and  is  therefore  "unstable  in  heredity."  He  cites  as 
illustration  the  artistic  temperament  with  its  commingling  of 
Bohemianism,  passion,  and  lack  of  "regularity,  foresight  and 
level  common  sense." 

Havelock  Ellis  in  his  Study  of  British  Genius^  notes  that  j5fty- 
seven  of  the  eminent  men  in  his  list  were  the  sons  of  more  or  less 
reprehensible  fathers,  who  transmitted  to  their  distinguished 
offspring  nothing  better  perhaps  than  "an  inaptness  to  follow  the 
beaten  tracks  of  life."  He  thinks  also  that  "a  certain  degree  of 
inoffensive  eccentricity  ....  seems  to  be  not  very  uncommon 
among  the  fathers  of  men  of  eminent  ability,  and  perhaps  fur- 
nishes a  transmissible  temperament  from  which  genius  may 
develope."  It  would  appear  in  short  that  while  men  of  achieve- 
ment nearly  always  have  one  or  more  parents  or  ancestors  who 
were  out  of  the  ordinary,  in  many  cases  an  exact  knowledge  of 
their  peculiarities  might  not  throw  very  much  light  upon  the 
accomplishments  of  their  offspring. 

A  final  remark  should  be  made  upon  the  peculiar  difficulties 
which  surround  the  inheritance  of  mental  traits.  While  physical 
characteristics  are  capable  of  direct  observation,  mental  differences 
must  be  ascertained  for  the  most  part  by  means  of  inference.  An 
individual  either  has  or  has  not  blue  eyes,  black  hair,  average 
stature,  sound  lungs,  etc.  The  facts  are  easily  ascertained.  But 
when  we  come  to  the  mental  differences  which  are  the  most 
significant  from  the  standpoint  of  future  achievement,  we  find 
that  few  conclusions  can  be  based  upon  direct  observation,  or 
exact  measurements.  To  be  sure  with  such  simple  things  as 
memory  type,  and  the  various  reaction  times  with  which  the 
practicing  i)sychologist  has  familiarized  us,  a  fair  approximation 
to  definitive  results  may  be  looked  for,  but  in  regard  to  the  higher 

'Op.  cii.,  p.  XV.  'Op.  cit.,  p.  104. 


HEREDITY  AND  OPPORTUNITY  17 

complexes  of  motives  which  drive  men  far  in  the  race  of  life  or 
leave  them  early  stranded  by  the  way,  or  plodding  at  snail's  pace 
where  others  fly,  these  are  matters  upon  which  neither  the  science 
of  inheritance  nor  the  psychological  laboratory  are  likely  to  throw 
much  prophetic  light. 

As  Dr.  Bronner  points  out  in  Psychology  of  Special  Abilities 
and  Disabilities:^ 

It  is  quite  doubtful  if  tests  will  ever  offer  an  effective  means  of  studying 
these  complex  aspects  of  mentality  [the  emotional  side  of  life].  The  situations 
which  in  real  life  call  the  emotions  into  play  are  not  easily  duplicated  in  the 
laboratory,  and  artificial  stimuli  for  arousing  them  necessarily  would  result 
in  totally  different  reactions.  How  can  one  study  experimentally  love  and 
hate  as  they  affect  behavior?  Or  what  can  tests  reveal  concerning  the 
formation  and  results  of  anti-social  grudges  ? 

A  man's  destination  in  life  depends  upon  much  else  than 
his  hereditary  equipment;  it  depends  upon  an  environment 
so  complicated  and  so  pregnant  with  potential  stimulations 
that  science  has  as  yet  hardly  begun  a  survey  of  either  its  limits 
or  its  processes.  All  estimates  of  ability  are  inferences  from 
performance  or  behavior  of  some  sort  and  are  liable  to  error  from 
two  principal  sources;  first,  those  stimuli  which  have  acted  to 
produce  past  achievement  as,  e.g.,  in  the  classroom  or  on  the  ath- 
letic field,  may  not  be  effectively  reproduced  in  the  counting-room, 
the  clinic,  or  wherever  the  scene  of  the  individual's  life-work  may 
be  laid;  second,  the  judgment  passed  upon  many  an  individual 
may  well  be  unfavorable  because  that  individual  has  not  been 
incited  to  his  own  characteristic  type  of  performance  by  any 
appropriate  stimulus  in  his  narrow  environment.  Even  college 
does  not  in  the  least  arouse  some  natures  of  very  unusual  force  and 
abiHty;   ex-President  Roosevelt  is  a  case  in  point. 

Before  leaving  the  question  of  the  significance  of  the  heredi- 
tary factor,  some  notice  should  be  taken  of  an  extraordinary 
corollary  which  sometimes  accompanies  the  extensive  claims  made 
on  behalf  of  this  factor.  I  refer  to  natural  selection  now  thought 
to  be  so  incapacitated  by  the  assaults  of  modern  humanitarianism 
as  to  be  quite  powerless  to  hold  the  race  back  in  its  headlong  plunge 

'  Op.  cit.,  p.  21. 


l8  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

toward  deterioration.  Only  a  few  years  ago,  Dr.  Charies  B. 
Davenport,  director  of  the  Station  for  Experimental  Evolution 
of  the  Carnegie  Institute,  ventured  to  refer  to  the  "beneficent 
agent  of  extensive  infant  mortality"  and  that  in  a  paper  pre- 
pared for  the  annual  meeting  of  the  American  Association  for 
Study  and  Prevention  of  Infant  Mortality!'  Let  us  take  time  to 
look  into  the  workings  of  this  "beneficent  agent."  If  an  artisan 
has  seven  children  and  three  of  them  die  of  enteritis,  meningitis, 
pneumonia,  or  what-not,  it  is  assumed  that  the  four  who  remain 
will  fare  better  than  the  three  who  were  taken  in  regard  to  physi- 
cal and  mental  traits.  What  appears  difficult  to  understand  is 
the  precise  connection  which  is  assumed  to  exist  between  these 
traits  and  such  selective  agents  as  tubercle  bacilli,  pneumococci, 
and  other  organisms  held  in  such  warm  esteem  by  some  eugenists. 
However  highly  endowed  by  the  Creator  (or  perhaps  we  had 
better  say  by  some  of  his  spokesmen)  these  wise  little  germs  may 
be,  can  we  after  all  feel  certain  that  they  are  always  able  to  tell 
a  stupid  baby  from  a  gifted  one,  or  even,  granted  that  they  can 
distinguish  at  a  glance  between  the  dull  and  the  bright,  can  we 
be  confident  that  they  are  so  perfect  in  goodness  as  to  invariably 
turn  away  from  the  little  prospective  success  to  bury  their  fangs 
in  the  little  prospective  failure  ?  There  are  those  who  have  even 
doubted  the  goodness  and  wisdom  of  God;  why  then  should  we 
be  asked  to  venture   upon  the  worship  of  bugs  ? 

Perhaps  the  only  thing  which  may  really  be  asserted  with 
any  confidence  is  this:  The  individuals  which  are  spared  by  a 
given  type  of  infection  are  possibly  by  nature  more  resistant  to 
that  specific  infection  than  are  the  individuals  who  succumb,  but 
this  difference  is  probably  slight.  Now  in  what  other  respects 
do  these  selected  survivors  differ  from  the  rest  of  the  population  ? 
Are  they  better,  wiser,  firmer,  more  resourceful,  more  appreciative, 
or  more  si)iritual?  So  far  as  yet  appears,  they  excel  solely  in 
their  ability  to  meet  one  kind  of  contingency  in  life  and  one  only, 
viz.:  infection  by  a  specific  micro-organism.  In  thousands  of 
other  contingencies  that  sift  and  test  human  ability,  contingencies 
of  vastly  greater  significance  for  bringing  out  those  differences 
in  men  which  count  for  human  achievement,  they  show  no  special 

'  Transactions,  1913,  p.  135. 


HEREDITY  AND  OPPORTUNITY  19 

excellence.  All  we  can  say  for  a  high  resistance  to  smallpox,  for 
example,  is  that  it  formerly  made  the  individual  a  somewhat 
better  life-risk  in  an  actuarial  sense  in  a  community  exposed  to 
ravages  of  that  disease;  a  group  of  negro  women  and  girls  were 
commended,  in  the  advertisement  of  an  old  slave  sale,  as  "es- 
pecially likely"  in  that  they  had  all  had  smallpox.  But  just  as 
soon  as  infection  of  a  given  sort  can  be  controlled  by  immuni- 
zation or  other  prophylactic  measures,  the  differences  of  resistance 
become  neghgible.  Smallpox,  typhoid,  rabies,  cholera,  plague, 
tetanus,  and  diphtheria  are  all  proving  increasingly  susceptible 
of  control  by  means  of  a  prophylactic  inoculation,  while  yellow 
fever,  malaria,  hookworm  disease,  and  other  maladies  yield 
readily  to  public  and  private  hygiene.  Nobody  mourns  because 
we  are  thus  being  deprived  of  the  selective  agency  of  these  diseases, 
or  because  the  average  resistance  of  the  population  to  these 
diseases  will  doubtless  decline.  It  is  often  asserted  that  the  sort 
of  sifting  that  falls  to  the  lot  of  the  poor  results  in  a  much  higher 
average  of  vitality,  at  least  in  those  who  survive.  Abundant 
vigor — the  capacity  for  hard  work  which  approaches  genius — 
is  said  to  coincide  with  resistance  to  disease.  "Weak"  babies 
are  said  to  be  eHminated  naturally  by  the  hard  conditions  of  the 
life  of  the  poor.  It  may  well  be  admitted  that  some  puny  infants 
are  such  because  of  a  defective  inheritance  and  these  are  less 
likely  to  survive  in  a  bad  environment.  Let  us  be  fair  and  credit 
that  much  to  the  barbarous  social  conditions  which  often  prevail 
in  industrial  and  sometimes  in  agricultural  communities.  They 
do  weed  out  a  certain  number  of  hereditarily  weak  individuals. 
But  the  whole  truth  is  that  untoward  social  conditions  are  at  work 
during  the  whole  nine  months  of  intra-uterine  development  and 
during  all  of  infancy  and  childhood,  and  are  making  out  of  perfectly 
good  stock  as  well,  a  multitude  of  twisted,  warped,  and  undervita- 
lized  individuals  who  quite  unnecessarily  succumb  to  marasmus, 
or  infantile  infections,  or  the  diseases  of  childhood,  or,  if  they 
reach  maturity,  bear  in  their  bodies  and  their  minds  the  marks 
impressed  by  prenatal  and  infantile  deprivations. 

Dr.  Hans  Zinsser,  professor  of  bacteriology  at  the  College  of 
Physicians  and  Surgeons,  Columbia  University,  in  his  recent  work 


20  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

on  Infection  and  Resistance^  inclines  to  the  view  that  individuals 
of  the  same  species 

differ  but  slightly  from  each  other  in  reaction  to  the  same  infectious  agent. 
This  would  indicate  that  the  individual  differences  in  resistance  displayed 
so  plainly  by  human  beings  are  due,  not  to  any  fundamental  individual  vari- 
ations, but  rather  to  such  fortuitous  factors  as  nutrition,  metabolic  fluctuations, 
temporary  physical  depression,  fatigue,  or  chilling. 

Thus  it  may  turn  out  that  of  the  artisan's  seven  children,  the  three 
who  succumbed,  were  in  general  simply  those  who  got  a  little  more 
than  their  share  of  the  mahiutrition,  chilling,  fatigue  or  "tem- 
porary physical  depression"  of  which  life  seems  to  hold  so  much 
in  store  for  those  in  its  lower  ranks. 

A  few  eugenists  who  still  permit  themselves  vague  commenda- 
tions of  "the  beneficent  agent  of  extensive  infant  mortality" 
fail  to  point  out  why  they  incline  to  think  that  a  high  infant- 
mortality  rate  is  a  blessing  to  the  race  while  a  high  typhoid  or  small- 
pox rate  is  a  disgrace  to  civilization.  War,  they  have  decided,  has 
fallen  from  grace  and  is  no  longer  a  eugenic  agent;  its  selections 
are  no  longer  marked  by  nice  discrimination  as  in  a  former  day. 
Let  them  look  to  their  germs  as  well — perhaps  they  too  have 
lost  their  cunning  and  like  war  deserve  to  be  relegated  to  the 
rear  in  the  march  of  civilization.  A  vicious  environment  in  short 
is  open  to  the  suspicion  that  it  takes  toll  all  along  the  line;  that 
it  weakens  the  strong,  kills  the  weak,  robs  the  individual,  and 
robs  the  race.  Some,  whom  it  does  to  death,  can  well  be  spared; 
multitudes,  whom  it  undermines  and  renders  ineffective,  deserved 
of  life  the  opportunity  for  better  things. 

It  must  be  admitted  that  those  who  lay  major  emphasis  upon 
the  influence  of  inheritance  are  quite  right  in  maintaining  that 
no  end  of  good  environment  will  not  raise  the  average  of  racial 
quahty  one  iota,  but  it  must  not  be  forgotten  that  no  end  of 
eugenics  would  not  avail  to  solve  some  of  the  gravest  of  human 
problems.  The  gravity  of  two  of  these  is  beyond  dispute:  social 
injustice  and  war.  Both  are  evils  which  will  be  cured  by  human- 
izing group  sentiments,  by  generalizing  those  elemental  impulses 
of  good  will  which  are  sufficiently  present  in  all  tribes  and  peoples, 

'Op.  cil.,  p.  59. 


HEREDITY  AND  OPPORTUNITY  21 

but  which  hoary  exploitations  and  blind  chauvinisms  have  well- 
nigh  driven  out  of  the  human  breast.  It  is  not  to  eugenics  that 
we  shall  look  for  peace  on  earth  and  good  will  to  men.  Indeed, 
one  might  go  further  and  point  out  the  fact  that  the  entire 
Nietzschean  conception  of  Hfe  and  morals,  with  its  black  oppres- 
sion of  the  weak  by  the  strong — -"its  splendid  blonde  beasts 
lustfully  roving  in  search  of  their  prey"  quite  after  the  manner 
of  Belgium  in  1914 — ^is  entirely  consistent  with  the  eugenic  pro- 
gram, which  builds  upon  a  single  foundation  stone,  racial  vigor. 
The  most  perfect  beings  whom  the  sun  has  ever  shone  upon 
would,  if  impelled  by  a  vicious  social  philosophy,  make  a  perfect 
hell  on  earth.     And  humanity's  "best  people"  have  often  done  so. 

One  writer,  Frederick  Adams  Woods,  of  the  biological  school, 
who  seeks  to  establish  the  high  intellectual  and  moral  average  of 
the  royal  famihes  of  Europe,  establishes  also,  although  without 
intention,  the  thesis  that  breeding  alone  cannot  hold  back  even 
the  able  from  the  most  shocking  of  high  crimes  and  mis- 
demeanors, such  as  plunging  the  populations  of  Europe  into 
war  century  after  century,  and  in  the  intervals  of  peace  grinding 
the  face  of  the  poor. 

In  conclusion,  may  we  not  compress  our  estimate  of  the  heredi- 
tary factor  into  two  pithy  sentences  borrowed  from  that  shrewd 
observer  of  Hfe — the  Scotch  physician.  Dr.  James  Devon — "We 
inherit  all  the  faculties  and  powers  which  we  possess,  but  what 
they  are  only  the  event  shows.  Nothing  can  be  taken  out  of  a 
man  but  what  is  in  him,  but  there  may  be  a  good  deal  in  him 
which  is  never  taken  out." 


A  PROSPECTUS  OF  SOCIOLOGICAL  THEORY 


ALBION  W.  SMALL 
University  of  Chicago 


Note. — In  recent  years  the  writer  has  introduced  graduate  students  to 
general  sociology  by  a  course  in  the  Autumn  Quarter  on  the  evolution  of 
sociological  method  since  1800.  This  course  has  been  followed  in  the  Winter 
Quarter  by  an  outline  of  general  sociology.  The  present  paper  is  made  up  of 
three  introductions  to  this  latter  course.  They  were  written  in  1920,  1915, 
and  19 1 6  respectively.  Although  in  some  respects  they  overlap  and  dupli- 
cate one  another,  they  place  the  emphasis  at  slightly  different  points,  and  to- 
gether they  form  a  consistent  exhibit.  They  are  presented  here  in  the  order 
indicated. 

\\Tiether  introductions  ever  really  introduce;  whether  such  general  views 
as  every  synthetic  thinker  wants  to  present  ever  take  shape  in  the  minds  of 
beginners,  in  advance  of  detailed  instruction  about  rudiments,  is  a  question 
which  I  find  myself  each  year  a  little  less  inclined  to  answer  with  a  confident 
affirmative.  Nevertheless  I  cannot  shake  off  the  ingrained  sense  of  duty  to 
perform  a  ritual  of  introduction.  I  try  to  assure  myself  with  the  reflection 
that  if  it  does  not  mean  anything  at  the  point  where  academic  custom  pre- 
scribes it,  after  it  has  itself  been  introduced  by  the  course  to  which  in  form  it 
was  the  preface,  it  may  have  acquired  meaning.  I  therefore  recommend  that 
it  be  read  in  advance  with  zeal  even  if  perforce  without  knowledge,  and  then 
that  it  be  reread  as  a  review  at  the  end  of  the  course,  and  with  such  piety  as 
may  be  consistent  with  further  acquaintance. 

Teachers  of  general  sociology  will  ask  no  apology  from  one  of  their  number 
for  printing  such  an  extract  from  the  notes  which  he  has  actually  used  in  the 
classroom.  Whether  other  teachers  follow  a  method  like  or  unlike  his,  they 
will  have  uses  for  this  transcript  from  actual  experience.  For  reasons  which 
I  have  indicated  in  the  "  First  Introduction,"  I  hope  that  other  readers  of  the 
Journal  will  find  this  informal  pedagogical  talk  not  wholly  unprofitable. 

I.      ESTTRODUCTION  OF  I920 

There  are  two  quite  distinct  points  of  view  from  which  to  pass 
judgment,  first,  upon  what  sociology  actually  is,  and  second,  upon 
what  it  is  worth.  Those  are  the  viewpoints,  first,  of  those  who 
intend  to  pursue  sociology  as  a  profession,  second,  of  those  who 
do  not.     In  the  world  at  large,  and  even  in  a  graduate  class  in 


A  PROSPECTUS  OF  SOCIOLOGICAL  THEORY  23 

sociology,  those  who  look  from  the  professional  viewpoint  are  and 
should  be  the  minority.  Yet,  for  a  number  of  reasons,  every 
graduate  course  in  sociology  must  be  adapted  primarily  to  the 
needs  of  this  minority.  The  time  is  so  short  compared  with  the 
scope  of  the  subject  that  it  must  be  devoted  chiefly  to  those  aspects 
of  the  subject  which  are  most  fundamental,  so  that  those  who 
intend  to  make  it  the  whole  or  a  part  of  their  profession  may  have 
the  necessary  basis  on  which  their  further  specialization  may  have 
sufficient  support.  But  those  same  aspects  of  human  affairs  are 
equally  fundamental  to  intelUgent  life  in  any  vocation.  There 
is  a  practical  use  for  systematic  introduction  to  them,  whatever 
be  one's  subsequent  calling. 

I  have  never  been  able  to  convince  myself,  therefore,  that  if  I 
could  offer  a  single  major  in  sociology  to  graduate  students  who 
had  made  up  their  minds  not  to  be  professional  sociologists,  I  could 
shape  up  a  course  that  would  be  more  valuable  for  them  in  the  long 
run  than  this  course  which  is  the  best  I  know  how  to  offer  to 
future  professional  sociologists. 

In  this  course,  and  especially  in  the  first  half  of  it,  I  spend  most 
of  the  time  explaining  a  few  of  the  most  important  general  ideas 
w^hich  are  the  most  ordinary  tools  of  sociological  thinking.  These 
ideas  are  to  further  sociological  thinking  what  such  ideas  as 
"point,"  "line,"  "straight  line,"  "curved  line,"  "angle,"  "right 
angle,"  "acute  angle,"  "obtuse  angle,"  "triangle,"  "quadrilateral," 
"polygon,"  "circle,"  "two  dimensions,"  "three  dimensions,"  etc., 
are  to  further  thinking  in  geometry.  Only  a  few  of  us  ever 
in  our  lives  teach  a  class  in  geometry.  Still  fewer  of  us  ever  in 
our  lives  conduct  a  piece  of  original  geometrical  research.  On 
the  other  hand  every  one  of  us  has  to  live  his  whole  life  in  space. 
All  our  experience  has  to  be  within  the  setting  of  space  relations. 
Even  in  the  instinctive  impulse  to  "cut  across  lots"  on  the  way 
to  school,  and  to  avoid  square  pegs  to  plug  round  holes,  we  are 
unconsciously  adapting  ourselves  to  space  relations  for  which 
geometry  furnishes  names  and  explanations  and  rules.  To  keep 
cobwebs  out  of  our  minds  about  these  ordinary  everyday  space 
relations,  or  to  remove  cobwebs  that  are  already  in  our  minds, 
these  elementary  geometrical  notions  must  be  acquired  somehow 


S4  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

or  other.  It  would  probably  be  a  saving  of  time  in  the  long  run, 
it  would  probably  make  life  more  comfortable  and  happy  for  each 
man  and  woman  in  the  world,  if  it  were  possible  for  all  to  go  through 
the  same  elementary  training  in  geometry  which  would  be  the 
wisest  sort  of  training  at  the  start  for  the  few  who  are  destined  to 
spend  their  lives  teaching  geometry. 

The  analogy  in  this  one  respect  between  geometry  and  sociology 
is  very  close.  It  makes  no  difference  whether  we  are  professional 
social  scientists  of  some  sort,  or  whether  we  are  butchers  or  bakers 
or  candlestick-makers.  We  spend  our  lives  in  many  kinds  of  con- 
tact and  commerce  with  other  human  beings.  Whether  we  will 
or  no,  give  and  take  of  influence  with  other  human  beings  form  the 
setting  for  the  career  of  each  of  us.  If  we  are  to  Hve  in  clear  con- 
sciousness of  what  is  happening  to  us,  and  of  what  we  are  doing 
to  the  world,  instead  of  sleepwalking  through  life,  we  have  to  get 
wise  somehow  or  other  to  those  elementary  types  of  human  relation- 
ship for  which  sociology,  to  the  extent  of  its  means,  supplies  names 
and  explanations  and  rules.  Accordingly  it  is  an  asset  to  anybody 
who  has  to  live  in  this  world  to  acquire  a  working  acquaintance 
with  those  generalizations  of  the  recurrent  types  of  human  relation- 
ships which  are  carried  in  these  sociological  names  and  explanations 
and  rules.  If  I  knew,  therefore,  that  each  student  had  decided 
to  be  a  professional  chemist,  or  philologist,  or  astronomer,  a  surgeon, 
a  newspaper  editor,  a  banker,  a  farmer,  a  licensed  accountant,  or  a 
civil  engineer,  I  should  vary  this  course  only  in  the  choice  of  the 
incidental  illustrations  I  should  use.  I  should  say  to  myself, 
"These  people  have  decided  to  give  sociology  a  chance  at  them  four 
hours  a  week  for  three  months.  It  may  be  this  is  the  only  formal 
hearing  they  will  ever  give  to  sociology.  The  main  work  of  their 
Kves  will  be  something  quite  different  from  sociology.  In  what 
way  can  sociology  speak  for  itself  in  that  brief  time,  so  as  to  be  as 
important  a  factor  as  possible  in  the  future  functioning  of  these 
people,  who  are  not  to  be  sociologists,  nor  even  social  scientists  of 
any  sort?" 

As  I  said,  my  answer  to  that  question  would  be  this  course, 
substantially  as  I  have  organized  it  as  a  first  course  for  graduate 
students  who  propose  to  specialize  in  sociology.     There  cannot 


A  PROSPECTUS  OF  SOCIOLOGICAL  THEORY  25 

be  one  geometry  for  ministers,  another  for  lawyers,  another  for 
teachers,  or  one  chemistry  for  CathoUcs,  another  for  Baptists, 
another  for  Christian  Scientists.  The  variations  in  geometry  or 
chemistry  to  accommodate  different  vocations  are  simply  in 
differences  of  time  which  may  wisely  be  devoted  to  the  subject, 
in  proportion  to  the  other  desirable  knowledge,  and  they  are 
differences  in  subject-matter  worth  studying  in  detail  after  the 
elements  are  acquired.  A  minister  might  never  have  use  for  more 
geometry  than  he  learned  in  high  school.  An  architect,  a  land 
surveyor,  a  mechanical  engineer,  would  deal  with  certain  distinctive 
apphcations  of  geometry  all  his  life. 

In  a  similar  way,  there  cannot  be  one  sociology  for  settlement 
workers,  another  for  salesmen,  another  for  capitalists,  another  for 
college  professors.  There  will  be  pecuHarly  appropriate  elabora- 
tions and  applications,  but  the  underlying  principles  must  be 
identical.  Human  relations  are  what  they  are,  no  matter  who  looks 
at  them.  Sociology  is  an  attempt  to  set  in  order  the  most  typical 
human  relations  in  such  a  way  that  their  bearings  upon  one  an- 
other, in  their  ordinary  forms,  will  be  evident  to  anyone  of  sufficient 
mental  grasp  to  understand  them. 

I  am  still  speaking  particularly  to  the  state  of  mind  of  those 
who  do  not  intend  to  specialize  in  sociology.  Especially  in  the 
first  part  of  the  course,  and  perhaps  in  all  of  it,  I  shall  seem  to  be 
dealing  with  ideas  so  abstract  that  they  have  no  possible  applica- 
tion to  any  interests  not  professionally  sociological.  The  question 
would  be  natural  whether  I  am  so  naive  as  to  suppose  that  any- 
one not  solemnly  dedicated  to  sociology  will  take  these  abstractions 
to  heart  as  daily  companions,  and  subjects  of  conversation;  whether 
I  suppose  that  before  doing  any  sort  of  thinking,  students  who  have 
taken  this  course  will  call  up  these  sociological  ideas,  and  ask  them 
what  they  have  to  say  about  the  subject. 

My  answer  is  that  I  no  more  expect  this  than  I  expect  the 
average  man  to  keep  his  mind  constantly  dwelling  on  the  definitions 
and  rules  of  arithmetic  that  he  learned  in  the  grades.  For  most 
of  them  he  may  never  in  his  life  have  a  conscious  use.  On  the  other 
hand,  he  may  have  frequent  occasion  to  use  some  of  them  which 
in  school  seemed  to  him  most  meaningless.     I  cannot  recall  that 


26  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

since  I  taught  my  last  district  school,  while  I  was  a  college  under- 
graduate, I  have  ever  had  occasion  to  find  a  least  common  multiple, 
or  a  greatest  common  divisor,  or  to  extract  a  cube  root.  Yet  I 
should  hate  to  be  ignorant  of  what  either  is,  or  to  be  unable  to 
refresh  my  memory  so  as  to  compute  either  if  occasion  required. 
On  the  other  hand,  both  for  theoretical  and  practical  purposes  I 
have  all  my  life  had  frequent  occasion  to  reckon  percentages,  and 
the  rules  for  handling  decimals  have  been  as  real  to  me  as  they 
are  to  a  teacher  of  arithmetic  or  to  a  book-keeper.  Sociological 
technicalities  have  a  precisely  analogous  part  in  the  life  of  anyone 
who  is  not  a  professional  sociologist.  They  have  a  certain  desira- 
bility as  a  mental  background,  just  as  arithmetic  has,  as  a  stimula- 
tor of  general  consciousness  of  quantity  values,  whether  one  has 
occasion  very  often  to  calculate  precise  quantities  or  not.  Then 
these  sociological  technicalities,  like  certain  rules  of  arithmetic, 
have  value  as  mental  tools  for  dealing  with  specific  social  rela- 
tions which  actually  arise  in  ordinary  experience,  just  as  the  non- 
mathematician  may  have  occasion  to  reckon  interest  on  loans  due 
from  him  or  to  him. 

So  much  for  the  relation  of  non-professional  people  to  sociology. 
I  will  say  nothing  now  especially  for  those  who  do  plan  to  specialize 
in  sociology.     That  comes  in  other  places. 

There  is  something  further,  however,  which  very  much  needs  to 
be  said  to  specialists  and  non-specialists  alike,  and  the  need  for 
saying  it  has  grown  in  recent  years. 

Ten  or  fifteen  years  ago  the  superstition  was  at  its  height  that 
psychology  was  a  magic  key  to  all  the  problems  of  education,  and 
consequently  to  all  the  problems  of  society.  Thousands  of  teachers 
flocked  into  psychological  lecture-rooms  in  the  expectation  of 
getting  tabloid  psychological  prescriptions  that  would  make  the 
practice  of  teaching  as  easy  and  precise  as  simple  sums  in  arithmetic. 
Psychological  quacks  encouraged  these  expectations,  and  all  the 
responsible  psychologists  were  unable  to  undo  their  mischief. 

If  that  delusion  may  not  be  said  to  have  run  its  course,  it  has 
apparently  spent  a  great  deal  of  its  force.  It  is  not  as  much  in 
evidence  as  it  was  a  few  years  ago.  The  same  kinds  of  people  who 
followed  the  psychological  delusion  a  httle  earlier  seem  now  to  be 


A  PROSPECTUS  OF  SOCIOLOGICAL  THEORY  27 

turning  with  similar  fatuity  to  sociology.  The  very  marked  in- 
crease of  interest  in  sociology  of  late,  especially  in  normal  schools, 
is  by  no  means  altogether  a  healthy  symptom.  In  many  cases  its 
impulse  is  quite  as  unintelligent,  quite  as  certain  to  be  disappointed 
as  the  earlier  hopes  that  psychology  would  prove  to  be  the  revealer 
of  an  infalhble  pedagogy. 

I  have  often  confessed  that  American  sociologists  have  not 
been  without  fault  for  the  existence  of  this  attitude.  Twenty-five 
years  ago  they  were  themselves  harboring  over-sanguine  ideas  of 
what  their  specialty  might  accomplish.  There  are  many  reasons 
why  we  should  now  be  very  expHcit  and  very  emphatic  in  our 
disclaimers  of  any  such  exaggeration. 

This  is  our  present  belief  and  our  present  claim.  The  most 
important  study  for  man  is  mankind.  All  men  are  studying  man- 
kind in  one  way  or  another.  Every  man  whose  mind  is  normal 
uses  the  opportunities  which  his  occupation  affords  for  collecting 
observations  about  mankind  in  both  collective  and  individual 
specimens.  Some  of  us  try  to  do  this  scientifically.  That  is,  we 
do  it  not  merely  in  the  casual  way  which  any  vocation  whatever 
permits,  but  we  do  it  as  a  vocation  in  itself.  We  study  from  the 
standpoint  of  one  of  the  social  sciences.  Whether  our  study  of 
mankind  is  merely  occasional  and  incidental  to  other  employments, 
or  a  profession  itself,  we  do  not  get  as  wise  as  it  is  possible  to 
become  about  human  nature  from  all  the  different  angles  in  which 
it  presents  itself.  In  general  we  have  to  get  acquainted  with 
mankind  first  as  a  continual  play  of  many  motives,  or  psychologi- 
cally; second,  as  the  continuance  of  influences  which  had  their 
beginnings  long  ago,  or  historically;  third,  as  engaged  in  a  constant 
wrestling  with  nature  for  the  physical  means  of  existence,  or 
economically;  fourth,  as  impelled  by  universal  egotism  into  strife 
for  precedence  in  controUing  the  opportunities  of  life,  or  politically; 
fifth,  (and  in  a  certain  sense  including  all  the  others)  as  instinctively 
and  later  methodically  acting  in  groups  for  promotion  of  each  and 
all  of  the  various  human  purposes,  or  sociologically. 

Now  the  sociological  claim  is  not  that  sociology  is  a  magic 
which  reaches  superior  wisdom  about  mankind  by  means  of  which 
it  has  a  monopoly.     The  claim  is  that  sociology  has  elaborated 


28  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

certain  processes  of  analysis  by  means  of  which  each  and  all  of  the 
four  other  principal  ways  of  approach  to  knowledge  of  mankind 
may  become  more  instructive  than  either  or  all  of  them  could  be 
without  this  sociological  co-operation.  There  is  no  mystery  in 
the  vulgar  sense,  no  occultism  in  this  claun.  It  means  that 
sociology  has  found  out  how  to  pry  into  certain  aspects  of  human 
experience  which  had  not  attracted  much  attention  till  less  than 
a  half-century  ago,  and  that  these  neglected  aspects  of  human 
experience  are  not  only  instructive  in  themselves  but  they  throw 
much  light  upon  those  other  aspects  which  had  been  longer 
observed. 

This  amounts  to  the  statement  that  sociologists  no  longer 
claim,  as  they  did  a  generation  ago,  that  they  are  dealing  with  a 
detached  sphere  of  knowledge — as  indeed  historians,  and  econo- 
mists, and  political  scientists,  and  psychologists  also  claimed  for 
their  several  specialties  a  generation  ago.  All  thoroughly  en- 
lightened students  of  mankind  today  speak  of  their  specialties 
each  as  one  among  many  techniques  for  searching  into  the  one 
comprehensive  reality  of  human  experience. 

We  instinctively  ask  innumerable  questions  about  hvmian 
experience.  These  questions  range  all  the  way  from  the  queries 
of  idle  curiosity  about  our  next-door  neighbor's  whims,  and  habits, 
and  character,  to  the  kinds  of  questions  we  ask  when  we  are  try- 
ing to  compose  a  philosophy  of  history.  What  passes  for  social 
psychology,  and  history,  and  economics,  and  political  science, 
and  sociology  is  cluttered  up  with  masses  of  more  or  less  authentic 
fact,  and  more  or  less  valid  reasoning  about  aspects  of  human 
experience  which  are  trivial  in  comparison  with  the  sort  of  knowl- 
edge which  we  need  in  order  to  indicate  the  most  dependable 
wisdom  in  planning  our  individual  or  social  lives.  Much  that 
passes  for  history  would  be  merely  the  negligible  gossip  of  the  local 
newspaper,  if  its  date  were  yesterday  instead  of  a  century  or 
two  ago.  Much  that  passes  for  political  economy  would  be  more 
precise  and  more  valuable  if  it  dropped  its  form  of  generality  and 
added  accuracy  by  getting  itself  transformed  into  the  shop  knowl- 
edge of  any  skilled  laborer.  Much  that  passes  for  sociology  is 
merely  rule-of-thumb  conclusions  about  how  to  conduct  friendly 


A  PROSPECTUS  OF  SOCIOLOGICAL  THEORY  29 

visiting,  or  how  to  make  out  a  questionnaire.  Each  of  these  things 
has  its  place,  but  human  experience  has  its  proportions  and  its 
perspectives  and  its  gradations  of  importance.  Because  this  is 
so,  procedure  which  quaHlies  as  scientific  study  of  human  experi- 
ence must  ultimately  exhibit  corresponding  proportions,  and  per- 
spectives and  gradations  of  importance.  Each  of  these  divisions 
of  social  science  is  concerned  in  its  way  with  finding  out  what 
aspects  of  human  experience  we  need  to  understand  first,  in  order 
that  we  may  understand  all  the  other  aspects  better.  From  the 
very  beginning  the  sociologists  have  asserted  that  the  older  divi- 
sions of  social  science  have  allowed  this  interest  in  proportions 
and  harmonies  between  real  and  possible  subjects  of  knowledge  to 
lag,  and  that  they  had  allowed  absorption  in  fragments  to  take 
its  place.  The  sociologists  became  spokesmen  for  this  necessary 
correlation  of  knowledge,  not  because  it  belonged  to  them  more 
properly  than  to  psychologists,  historians,  political  scientists  and 
economists,  but  because  everybody  else  was  ignoring  it.  From 
the  sociological  point  of  view  it  is  necessary  to  get  a  clear  vision, 
first  of  all,  of  the  different  ways  in  which  human  beings  associate; 
of  the  underlying  reasons  why  they  associate ;  of  the  forms  in  which 
they  associate;  of  the  effects,  for  weal  or  for  woe,  of  the  different 
forms  of  human  association  upon  the  purposes  which  instinctively 
or  methodically  seek  expression  through  association;  of  the  devices 
by  means  of  which  human  associations  are  controlled;  of  the  aims 
which  emerge  in  the  course  of  association  as  the  approved  objects 
of  human  endeavor;  of  standards  of  measure  for  these  conven- 
tional objects  of  endeavor;  whether  they  justify  themselves  as 
permanent  human  desirabilities,  or  whether  they  have  merely 
provisional  and  transitory  value. 

These,  and  such  as  these  are  the  big  questions  which  have  stimu- 
lated the  development  of  sociology  as  it  is  understood  in  the  United 
States.  As  the  sociologists  see  it,  all  social  science  has  dignity  in 
the  degree  of  its  devotion  to  the  ultimate  solution  of  these  uni- 
versal problems.  The  sociologists  have  ceased  to  imagine  that 
sociology  has  the  exclusive  mandate  to  formulate  and  solve  these 
problems.  They  are  becoming  aware,  as  they  were  not  at  first, 
that  these  are  larger  questions  than  any  single  type  of  men  can 


30  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

answer.  They  realize  that  the  answers  must  come,  in  so  far  as 
they  come  at  all,  from  co-operative  co-ordination  of  all  science 
and  all  Hfe.  The  sociologists  still  feel  that,  until  other  scholars 
relieve  them  of  the  burden,  they  have  a  sense  of  relation  which 
amounts  to  a  mandate  that  they  shall  do  their  best  to  keep  these 
big  problems  in  sight,  and  to  stimulate  all  other  scholars  to  direct 
their  studies  toward  contributions  to  the  solutions. 

In  brief,  one  of  the  ideas  that  will  be  kept  prominent  through- 
out this  course  is  that  there  is  no  magic  key  to  the  secrets  of  society. 
There  is  no  key  of  any  sort  in  the  strict  sense.  There  are  various 
techniques  by  means  of  which  different  factors  and  aspects  of  the 
social  reaUty  may  be  partially  understood  by  those  who  are  able 
and  willing  to  use  these  techniques  for  all  they  are  worth.  If  we 
are  able  and  willing  to  use  each  and  all  of  these  techniques  as  they 
supplement  one  another  we  may  gain  progressively  sane  and  bal- 
anced and  penetrating  insight  into  social  workings.^ 

II.      INTRODUCTION  OF   I915 

In  recent  years  it  has  become  increasingly  clear  to  me  that  so- 
ciology is  what  it  is,  in  the  practice  of  the  most  reliable  sociologists, 
much  more  than  it  is  what  is  formulated  as  definitive  or  descriptive 
of  it  by  the  same,  not  to  mention  less  significant  sociologists. 

Accordingly,  the  most  timely  report  may  be  compressed  into  the 
formula:  sociology  is  a  technique  in  the  making.  This  form  of  ex- 
pression is  deliberately  preferred  to  the  version  "sociology  is  a  sci- 
ence in  the  making."  Throughout  the  course  that  follows,  history, 
economics,  sociology,  etc.  are  treated  as  primarily  techniques, 
rather  than  "sciences."  Of  course,  every  technique  at  once  upon 
application  begins  to  be  also  a  tradition.  A  body  of  knowledge 
accumulates  through  use  of  the  technique.  This  fact  lends  plausi- 
bility to  the  claim  that  the  technique  is  a  "science."  In  so  far 
as  the  technique,  and  the  lore  which  it  accumulates,  facilitate 
control  of  any  body  of  experience,  whether  in  the  sense  of  under- 
standing, or  in  the  more  complete  sense  of  subjecting  to  the  will 
of  those  who  operate  the  technique,  the  attributes  of  "science" 
are  given.     Neither  severally  nor  collectively  do  the  disciplines  to 

'  Vide  Small,  title  "Sociology,"  in  Encyclopaedia  Americana. 


A  PROSPECTUS  OF  SOCIOLOGICAL  THEORY  31 

which  for  convenience  we  assign  the  group  title  "social  science" 
in  a  very  high  degree  satisfy  the  requirements  of  "  science."  Hence 
the  preference  for  the  less  pretentious  term  "technique." 

■  Sociology  is  described  in  so  many  ways  that  few  men  outside 
the  ranks  of  the  sociologists  themselves  are  convinced  that  it  has 
a  real  vocation.  The  apparent  contradictions  in  the  accounts 
that  various  sociologists  give  of  their  technique  are  to  be  explained, 
however,  less  as  real  divergences  of  opinion  about  the  scope  and 
mettiod  of  their  department  of  knowledge,  than  as  variations  in 
perspective  resulting  from  attempts  to  survey  the  whole  sociological 
procedure  from  many  points  of  view.  Scarcely  two  sociologists 
subscribe  without  qualification  to  a  single  description  of  their 
specialty.  At  the  same  time,  the  disagreements  are  very  largely 
matters  of  classification,  or  emphasis,  or  of  mere  terms,  while 
careful  inspection  of  the  work  carried  on  by  a  large  number  of  men 
who  call  themselves  sociologists  discovers  that  there  is  underlying 
unity  in  their  conceptions.  To  do  justice  to  the  subject,  we  must  not 
only  make  its  past  interpret  its  present  and  predict  its  future,  but 
we  must  hazard  the  very  dangerous  process  of  allowing  its  indicated 
future  to  interpret  its  past.  That  is,  the  scientific  factors  which 
have  brought  sociology  to  its  present  stage  of  development,  a  stage 
which  is  marked  by  many  apparently  incoherent  types  of 
sociological  inquiry  rather  than  by  a  homogeneous  system  of 
doctrine,  cannot  be  understood  unless  we  take  account  not  only 
of  their  history  on  the  one  hand,  but  of  their  tendencies  on  the 
other.  To  say,  then,  what  sociology  is  one  must  be  able  to  see 
some  distance  beyond  accomplished  facts  to  what  sociology  must 
be  when  the  forces  which  have  thus  far  worked  separately  will 
have  converged  into  conscious  co-operation.  The  following  account 
of  the  subject  is  accordingly  not  merely  a  description  of  the  visible 
traits  of  sociology,  but  an  interpretation  of  these  external  signs, 
and  to  a  certain  extent  a  prediction  of  the  spirit  in  which  the 
science  is  bound  to  develop. 

The  latest  definition  of  sociology  which  I  have  made  for  my  own 
use  is  this:  Sociology  is  study  of  human  experience  with  attention 
primarily  upon  forms  and  processes  of  groups.  As  I  see  it,  this 
definition  implies  several  things: 


32  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OP  SOCIOLOGY 

1.  Human  experience,  in  some  or  all  of  its  aspects  is  implicitly 
the  common  subject-matter  of  all  study  which  has  human  beings, 
in  any  phase  of  their  reality,  as  its  object.  This  is  true  because 
human  beings  in  their  particular  phases  are  always,  in  a  real  and 
large  measure,  functions  of  human  experience  in  general.  In  our 
ignorance,  we  propose  to  ourselves  the  pursuit  of  knowledge  of 
human  facts  in  numberless  detachments  and  abstractions.  If  we 
pursue  knowledge  with  an  open  mind  and  long  enough,  we  discover 
that  there  is  no  possibility  of  exhausting  the  meaning  of  these 
facts,  so  long  as  they  are  held  in  detachment  and  abstraction. 
Sooner  or  later  they  must  be  represented  within  the  whole  system 
of  relationships  which  is  their  medium  of  existence.  This  is  the 
occasion  for  the  proposition  to  be  reiterated  throughout  this 
course,  that  "social  science"  is  necessarily  one  science,  i.e.,  the 
science  of  the  experience  of  human  beings,  and  that  the  so-called 
social  sciences,  whatever  the  claims  of  their  promoters,  are  relatively 
sterile  until  they  fit  themselves  into  a  system  of  knowledge  which 
correlates  all  the  phases  of  human  experience. 

2.  Restating  one,  rather  than  adding  to  it,  sociology  then  is 
only  one  of  an  undetermined  number  of  valid  ways  of  studying 
human  experience,  all  of  which  ways  must  be  correlated  in  order 
to  make  study  of  human  experience  yield  the  most  objective  results 
possible;  that  is,  in  order  to  make  study  of  human  experience  in 
the  highest  degree  instructive. 

3.  Conversely,  all  the  other  valid  ways  of  studying  human 
experience  must  adjust  themselves  to  all  that  is  objective  in  the 
methods  and  results  of  sociology,  if  the  results  which  they  reach 
are  to  be  in  the  highest  degree  instructive. 

4.  Propositions  2  and  3  are  not  merely  verbal  variations  of  one 
and  the  same  idea.  On  the  contrary,  each  depends  upon  the  other 
for  reasons  involved  in  the  nature  of  human  experience.  That  is, 
since  the  middle  of  the  nineteenth  century  we  have  become  aware 
that  all  human  experience  is  primarily  group  experience.  Approxi- 
mate qualitative,  or  at  least  formal  knowledge  of  all  the  kinds  of 
groups  and  behaviors  of  groups  within  the  range  of  human  obser- 
vation is  accordingly  a  stage  through  which  intelligence  must  pass 
in  grasping  with  all  the  mind's  might  the  details  presented  by  all 


A  PROSPECTUS  OF  SOCIOLOGICAL  THEORY  33 

the  various  sorts  of  activities  falling  under  human  observation. 
In  other  words,  if  we  are  to  reach  an  understanding  of  human 
experience,  whether  as  it  is  presented  in  records  of  past  time,  or 
in  the  events  of  our  own  day,  that  selected  portion  of  experience 
must  be  represented  in  our  minds  in  terms  of  the  literal  reactions 
between  the  persons  concerned.  Otherwise  it  is  some  sort  of 
fictitious  substitute  for  reality.  This  means  that  we  must  acquire 
acquaintance  with  the  typical  forms  and  processes  into  which 
human  activities  arrange  themselves. 

Pedagogically,  then,  the  case  with  human  experience  is  thus  in 
some  degree  analogous  to  the  case  with  reference  to  knowledge  of 
physics.^  A  member  of  the  physics  staff  in  the  University  of  Chi- 
cago was  asked  lately,  "How  much  time  do  you  give  in  your 
introductory  physics  course  to  the  elementary  physical  concepts  ?  " 
''Practically  all  of  it,"  was  the  immediate  answer.  The  questioner 
continued:  "How  much  is  'all  of  it'?"  "Five  hours  a  week  for 
the  entire  Freshman  year."  "Do  you  mean  you  give  all  that  time 
to  the  general  ideas  of  physics,  beginning  with  such  elementary 
notions  as  "matter,"  "properties  of  matter,"  "density,"  "ad- 
hesion," "cohesion,"  "inertia,"  "momentum,"  "specific  gravity," 
etc.?"  "Yes,"  he  said,  "not  using  quite  your  list,  but  we  begin 
with  substantially  those  concepts  and  give  the  students  a  year  of 
introduction  to  progressively  more  difficult  physical  concepts,  be- 
fore they  are  started  upon  physical  problems."  A  few  days  later 
this  physicist  reopened  the  subject  by  saying  that  he  had  talked  it 
over  with  some  of  his  colleagues  and  had  found  that  80  per  cent 
was  their  average  estimate  of  the  proportion  of  the  first  year  that 
might  be  accounted  for  in  this  way. 

For  the  purpose  of  illustration  neither  the  aggregate  nor  the 
proportion  of  time  is  important.  It  is  true  in  "social  science," 
as  in  physics,  that  progress  toward  control  of  the  phenomena  has 
to  be  made  through  a  large  amount  of  attention  to  a  large  number 
of  topical  t>pes  and  behaviors  of  groups.^ 

'  Vide  note  on  the  Hegelian  categories,  Small,  General  Sociology,  p.  400. 

=  Accordingly,  my  General  Sociology,  the  chief  reference  book  for  this  course,  is 
not  a  system  of  sociological  theory.  It  is  an  exhibit  of  sociological  categories,  with 
indications  of  their  relations  to  one  another,  and  of  their  uses  as  tools  of  sociological 
research. 


34  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

It  is  no  less  true  that  sociology  would  be  impossible  if  other 
ways  of  studying  human  experience  did  not  supply  material  for 
sociological  generalization.  All  the  historical  and  descriptive  and 
analytical  methods  of  inquiry  into  past  or  present  human  experience 
furnish  necessary  data  which  sociology  generalizes,  together  with 
data  of  its  own  gathering,  in  terms  of  group-form  and  group- 
process.  Thereupon  these  generalizations  become  tools  both  for 
testing  the  credibility  and  the  sufficiency  of  previous  accounts  of 
human  experience,  and  for  evaluating  proposed  future  activities. 

For  instance,  how  do  we  arrive  at  the  generalization  to  which 
we  shall  return  presently  as  the  fundamental  sociological  idea, 
that  all  human  experience  is  group  experience,  not  merely  a  matter 
of  individual  fortune  ?  In  a  word,  from  history  on  the  one  hand, 
and  from  psycholog}^  on  the  other. 

This  answer  is  more  sweeping  in  form  than  the  precise  facts 
justify.  When  we  say  "history,"  we  must  mean  by  it  all  that 
inspection  of  past  events  which  comes  to  be  known  as  history 
when  its  method  conforms  to  the  strict  technique  which  the 
professional  historians  have  developed.  When  we  say  ''psy- 
chology," we  must  mean  by  it  all  that  observation  of  cause  and 
effect  in  mental  action  which  becomes  psychology  when  it  is  made 
systematic  and  critical.  This  means  too  that  we  use  the  terms 
"history"  and  "psychology"  to  include  between  them  all  the 
subdivisions  of  science  which,  on  the  one  hand,  deal  with  past 
events  as  such,  and,  on  the  other  hand,  trace  the  mental  reactions 
involved  in  events,  whether  past  or  present,  i.e.,  sur\'eys  of  the 
past,  and  inspection  of  the  operations  of  motives  whether  past  or 
present.  If  someone  did  not  recount  past  events,  and  if  some- 
one else  did  not  make  out  the  psychic  connections  between 
events,  past  or  present,  sociology  would  be  like  judgment  without 
the  assistance  of  memory.  Sociology  would  have  no  material  to 
work  on. 

We  repeat  then,  sociology  is  one  of  the  ways  in  which  we  must 
deal  with  all  available  knowledge  of  human  experience  if  the 
material  of  knowledge  is  to  yield  up  its  fullest  meaning. 

The  comprehensive  problem  of  sociology  may  be  formulated 
in  this  way:   What  processes  occur  in  the  contacts  and  commerce 


A  PROSPECTUS  OF  SOCIOLOGICAL  THEORY  35 

between  person  and  person,  from  the  most  primitive  and  simple 
associations  to  the  most  advanced  and  complex;  how  do  the 
contacts  between  person  and  person  in  different  types  of  association 
react  upon  the  personality  of  the  individuals  concerned,  and,  on 
the  other  hand,  how  do  the  individuals  in  contact  affect  the  terms 
under  which  they  associate?  Thus  sociology  rests  upon  the 
conception  that  human  experience  is  a  function  of  three  principal 
factors:  first,  the  physical  conditions  of  life;  second,  the  personal 
equation  of  individuals;  third,  the  types  of  association  in  which 
the  individuals  influence  one  another.  Each  of  these  factors  is 
recognized  as  a  variable.  Investigation  of  the  laws  of  variation 
of  the  first  factor  does  not  fall  within  the  proper  scope  of  sociology'. 
Those  laws  must  be  borrowed  from  the  physical  sciences  as  data 
for  sociology.  Assuming  those  data  as  relatively  fixed  terms  in 
the  social  equation,  sociology  proper  discovers  a  necessary  function 
in  uttering  its  testimony  among  social  scientists  of  all  sorts  that 
the  older  divisions  of  social  science  will  soon  find  themselves 
futile,  unless  progress  can  be  made  in  discovering  some  of  the  more 
constant  laws  of  reaction  between  nature  on  the  one  hand,  and 
individuals  and  groups  on  the  other.  Since  these  reactions  are 
the  principal  incidents  in  the  evolution  of  types  of  persons  and  types 
of  association,  it  is  a  betrayal  of  puerile  mental  grasp  that  we  have 
thus  far  felt  so  little  need  of  understanding  them.  The  sociologists 
have  accordingly  volunteered  as  pioneers  to  explore  these  neg- 
lected relations. 

On  one  of  its  frontiers  the  problems  of  sociology  merge  into 
those  of  anthropology  and  zoology;  that  is,  they  are  questions  of 
the  influence  of  physical  environment  upon  the  organic  develop- 
ment of  men.  Rooted  in  the  same  problems,  but  ramifying  in 
another  direction,  are  questions  of  the  relation  of  environment, 
particularly  the  conditions  of  the  food  supply,  to  types  of  wants, 
to  habits,  to  vocations,  to  distribution  of  population,  to  customs, 
and  to  institutions,  domestic  and  economic,  political  or  religious. 
Before  the  latter  order  of  problem  is  pursued  very  far  it  runs  into 
questions  which  must  be  treated  as  primarily  psychological;  viz., 
to  what  extent  and  in  what  ways  must  the  state  of  consciousness 
in  the  individuals  concerned  be  regarded  as  (a)  the  direct  effect, 


36  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

(b)  the  indirect  effect  of  the  physical  conditions;  and  to  what  extent 
and  in  what  ways  must  the  state  of  consciousness  in  the  individuals 
be  regarded  as  the  cause  of  the  actions  observed,  i.e.,  to  what 
extent  must  the  individuals  be  regarded  as  exerting  a  distinct 
psychical  reaction  upon  the  physical  conditions  ? 

A  parallel  division  of  problems  occurs  when  we  are  dealing 
with  phases  of  association  in  which  we  must  eliminate  the  physical 
factor  as  a  constant  element,  and  deal  with  the  individual  and 
associational  factors  as  the  unknown  quantities  to  be  ascertained. 
The  social  reactions  are  then  of  two  ground  types:  first,  those  in 
which  the  impulses  of  the  individual  modify  the  group;  second, 
those  in  which  the  impulses  of  the  group  modify  the  individual. 
Of  course  this  form  of  expression  is  merely  an  accommodation  to 
first  appearances.  The  fact  is  that  both  types  of  reaction  occur 
in  a  given  case.  The  one  or  the  other  is  the  chief  object  of  atten- 
tion in  its  turn.  Investigation  of  these  problems  requires  intimate 
co-operation  between  psychology  and  sociology.  Indeed,  it  has 
been  said  that  "the  division  of  labor  between  the  two  sciences  may 
be  fairly  represented  by  shifting  the  emphasis  upon  two  terms  in 
the  same  predicate:  viz.,  psychology  is  the  science  of  social  pro- 
cesses; sociology  is  the  science  of  social  processes."  In  other  words, 
the  strictly  social  reactions  are  psychical  reactions,  but  to  an 
extent  which  was  hardly  recognized  until  very  recent  years  psychical 
reactions  are  social  reactions.  We  may  accordingly  approach  the 
same  ultimate  facts  from  either  of  two  directions.  We  may  attempt 
to  explain  the  phenomena  of  consciousness  in  the  mind  of  an 
individual,  but  the  attempt  will  lead  at  last  into  explanation  of 
all  the  psychical  phenomena  in  the  range  of  association  in  which 
the  individual  lives  and  moves  and  has  his  being;  or  otherwise 
expressed,  every  psychological  problem  is  at  last  a  problem  of 
sociology.  On  the  other  hand,  we  may  try  to  explain  the  facts  of 
a  given  association,  its  genesis,  its  structure,  its  aims.  In  this 
case  we  find  that  the  association  always  resolves  itself  into  mental 
states  as  its  ultimate  factors;  so  that  every  sociological  problem 
is  in  the  last  analysis  a  problem  of  psychology.  Whether  psy- 
chology or  sociology  is  the  senior  partner  in  a  given  investigation 
depends  upon  the  phase  of  the  phenomena  to   be  regarded  as 


A  PROSPECTUS  OF  SOCIOLOGICAL  THEORY  37 

primary,  whether  mental  processes  are  to  be  considered  as  con- 
ditioned by  facts  of  association,  or  whether  social  situations  are 
considered  as  conditioning  or  conditioned  by  mental  processes. 

The  foregoing  propositions  prepare  the  way  for  further  defini- 
tion of  the  province  of  sociology,  by  distinguishing  it  from  some  of 
the  older  divisions  of  social  science.  Comparatively  few  persons 
are  convinced  that  there  is  room  for  a  science  or  a  technique  to 
be  called  sociology,  unless  it  should  succeed  merely  in  occupying 
ground  already  covered  by  one  or  more  of  these  "sciences,"  and 
in  giving  vogue  to  a  new  name.  If  we  analyze  and  generalize  the 
distinctive  efforts  of  the  sociologists,  we  find  that,  with  all  their 
seeming  heterogeneity,  they  are  directed  toward  a  common  center 
of  attention.  The  sociologists  in  common  with  all  other  social 
scientists  are  implicitly  concerned  with  the  evolution  of  human 
personality.  All  the  processes  which  result  in  types  of  individuals 
or  of  associations,  as  incidental  to  that  evolution,  all  the  processes 
in  which  the  individual  and  the  associational  types  form  a  per- 
petually reciprocating  series,  in  alternating  relations  of  cause  and 
effect,  have  been  selected  by  sociologists  as  their  peculiar  subject- 
matter.  In  other  words,  from  the  sociological  point  of  view, 
everything  in  experience  is  regarded  as  incidental  to  the  interpre- 
tation and  evaluation  of  people,  and  to  the  determination  of 
programs  by  means  of  which  more  ample  human  values  may  be 
realized. 

The  conventionaHties  of  the  social  sciences  are  so  confused 
that  this  formal  statement  is  by  no  means  clear  without  further 
explanation.  The  contrast  between  the  center  of  attention  in 
sociology  and  in  the  older  social  sciences  is  of  two  sorts.  In  the 
first  place,  we  have  types  of  ethnology  and  history,  for  example, 
in  which  there  is  no  visible  attempt  either,  on  the  one  hand,  to  dis- 
cover the  relative  values  of  physical  conditions,  of  people,  and  of 
the  machineries  and  products  of  people;  or  on  the  other  hand,  to 
place  these  three  factors  in  an  order  of  relationship  that  would 
show  which  of  them  is  to  be  considered  as  ultimate  and  essential, 
and  which  as  more  tributary  and  incidental,  in  the  final  interpreta- 
tion of  life.  These  types  of  social  science  accordingly  amount 
to  mere  description  of  more  or  less  clearly  assorted  phenomena, 


38  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

without  advancing  to  the  rank  of  very  highly  generaHzed  science 
of  the  causal  relations  contained  in  the  phenomena. 

In  the  second  place,  we  have  types,  notably  of  political  and 
economic  science,  which  expressly  define  their  problems,  not  in 
terms  of  people  at  all,  but  in  terms  of  a  technology  or  a  product  of 
human  activities.  Thus  we  have  variations  of  the  formulas, 
"Civics  is  the  science  of  government,"  and  ''Economics  is  the 
science  of  wealth."  Now  mere  words  must  not  be  taken  too 
seriously,  but  in  these  cases  the  uses  of  words  correspond  to  very 
essential  restrictions  of  purpose  and  method.  From  the  view- 
point of  sciences  so  defined  persons  are  by  definition  relegated  to 
secondary  consideration,  while  the  devices,  or  the  products  of 
persons  are  made  paramount.  The  tendency  to  which  we  are 
now  calling  attention  would  be  arrested  if  these  techniques  operated 
consistently  in  accordance  with  the  alternative  forms  of  expression : 
"Civics  is  the  science  of  people  in  their  processes  of  governing 
themselves,"  "Economics  is  the  science  of  people  in  their  behaviors 
toward  wealth." 

In  contrast  with  all  the  varieties  of  social  science  which  either 
fail  to  face  the  question  whether,  for  their  purposes,  people,  or  the 
gear  and  chattels  of  people  are  most  important;  and  in  contrast 
with  all  the  varieties  of  social  science  which  deliberately  choose 
not  people  but  the  machineries  or  the  possessions  of  people  as 
their  subject-matter,  sociology  has  instinctively  chosen  for  itself 
the  unclaimed  problem  of  the  objective  aspects  of  people  them- 
selves. By  this  form  of  expression  we  mean  to  distinguish  the 
sociological  from  the  psychological  division  of  labor.  The  latter 
we  would  speak  of  by  comparison  as  pertaining  primarily  to  the 
subjective  aspects  of  people.  How  do  human  personalities  develop 
out  of  gregarious  animal  associations  into  conventional  psychic 
associations,  and  how  do  types  of  individuals  and  of  their  group- 
ings, either  by  means  of  or  in  spite  of  their  material  and  spiritual 
impedimenta,  pass  from  stage  to  stage  in  the  evolution  of  persons 
and  of  their  social  combinations  ?  While  the  ethnologist  describes 
human  customs,  occupations,  technical  equipments  and  modes  of 
employing  them,  traditions,  beliefs,  ceremonies,  rites,  social  organi- 
zations, etc.;    while  the  historian  devotes  himself  to  occurrences 


A  PROSPECTUS  OF  SOCIOLOGICAL  THEORY  39 

in  which  human  beings  have  played  a  part,  with  the  utmost  license 
of  selection  of  classes  of  occurrences,  and  with  scientific  criticism 
aimed,  especially  after  ''critical"  methodology  had  been  developed, 
less  at  the  subject-matter  than  at  the  mere  technique  of  discovery; 
while  the  political  scientist  devotes  himself  to  men's  systems  of 
government,  and  while  the  peculiar  interest  of  the  economist 
centers  upon  the  processes  by  which  men  produce  wealth,  the 
sociologist  studies  men  themselves,  as  they  manifest  their  character 
in  all  the  variations  of  contact  with  one  another,  and  as  they  realize 
or  register  themselves  in  the  relations  which  occupy  the  previous 
sciences.  To  sociology,  then,  the  evolution  of  persons  is  the  central 
fact,  while  everything  else  is  incidental.  To  the  other  social 
techniques,  persons  are  virtually  incidental,  and  their  accidents 
are  central. 

This  last  proposition  is  true  not  necessarily  of  the  persons  who 
pursue  the  other  divisions  of  social  science,  but  of  the  processes 
which  compose  their  technique.  These  processes  necessarily 
divert  the  center  of  attention  from  people  as  such  to  those  im- 
personal things,  institutions.  For  social  science  as  a  whole,  an 
adequate  corrective  of  this  tendency  is  necessary.  I  do  not  claim 
that  sociology  is  that  corrective.  I  do  claim  that  the  sociological 
center  of  attention  tends  to  converge  thought  upon  people,  as 
differentiated  from  their  gear,  and  impedimenta,  and  machinery — 
in  short  from  their  institutions;  and  sociology  thus  does  some- 
thing to  arrest  the  devitalizing  and  desiccating  tendencies  in 
social  science. 

ni.      INTRODUCTION  OF  1916 

In  one  respect  this  course  is  like  the  old  story  of  the  boy's 
jackknife.  It  had  two  new  handles  and  five  new  blades,  but  he 
always  insisted  that  it  was  the  same  knife.  Multiply  the  numbers 
in  the  story  several  times  over  and  it  represents  the  facts  about 
this  course.  Each  year  since  it  was  first  announced  it  has  received 
a  new  handle  and  a  certain  number  of  new  blades.  To  speak 
Uterally,  I  have  given  each  year  what  seemed  to  me  at  the  time 
the  best  introduction  to  general  sociology  I  could  present.  Each 
year  I  have  learned  more  than  I  have  taught  about  the  relations 


40  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

with  which  sociologists  must  deal,  and  each  following  year  I  have 
reshaped  the  course  accordingly.  I  do  not  have  to  go  back  many 
years  in  my  lecture  notes  to  find  myself  in  a  kind  of  thinking  which 
is  as  different  from  my  present  tone  of  thought  as  the  German  and 
American  theories  about  war  are  from  each  other. 

Each  year  I  resolve  to  try  to  present  the  sociological  case  in  a 
little  simpler  form  than  I  have  ever  used  before.  Each  year  I 
hope  to  avoid  details  which  confuse  more  than  they  clarify.  I 
hope  by  so  doing  to  put  the  class  on  the  track  of  an  improved 
method  of  construing  human  relations.  I  believe  the  sociologists 
have  certain  keys  to  human  relations  which  make  human  experi- 
ence mean  more  than  could  be  found  in  it  without  the  sociological 
kind  of  interpretation.  I  shall  make  another  attempt  this  year 
to  justify  this  behef .  Of  course  I  do  not  mean  that  I  have  wiped  my 
slate  clean  of  all  the  work  I  have  done  on  it  before,  and  that  I  am 
proposing  an  altogether  new  interpretation  of  human  society. 
I  mean  that  from  year  to  year  I  have  developed  certain  details  in 
my  ways  of  analyzing  human  relations.  Each  year  a  somewhat 
modified  treatment  is  necessary  in  order  to  present  these  methods 
to  the  best  advantage.  In  particular  I  want  to  emphasize  what 
seems  more  important  and  to  slur  over  what  is  less  important  for 
a  brief  survey. 

I  will  begin  with  my  latest  answer  to  the  question,  What  is 
sociology  ?  viz.,  Sociology  is  that  variant  among  the  different  ways  of 
studying  the  common  subject-matter  of  the  social  sciences  which 
centers  its  attention  primarily  upon  the  forms,  processes,  and  values 
of  human  group  activities,  or  upon  human  group  phenomena  as 
such. 

At  once  this  description  implies  a  sharp  contrast  with  the 
descriptions  of  sociology  in  vogue  twenty-five  years  ago.  Then, 
and  for  many  years  afterward,  the  usual  descriptions  implied  and 
even  asserted  a  high  degree  of  separateness  among  the  social 
sciences.  Today  the  tendency  among  social  scientists  in  all  depart- 
ments is  to  recognize  and  even  emphatically  to  assert  the  necessary 
oneness  of  social  science,  while  the  so-called  "social  sciences"  are 
merely  divisions  of  that  one  social  science,  if  they  are  genuinely 
scientific  at  all. 


A  PROSPECTUS  OF  SOCIOLOGICAL  THEORY  41 

This  leads  me  to  advertise  at  once  that  if  one  hopes  to  do  any- 
thing serious  in  the  study  of  sociology,  one  must  be  prepared  to 
reckon  with  the  scientific  demands  of  the  whole  body  of  the  social 
sciences.  The  one  great  comprehensive  problem  in  the  realm  of 
the  social  sciences  is  the  question,  What  is  the  meaniitg  of  human 
experience?  So  far  as  its  value  for  strict  science  is  concerned  the 
whole  technique  of  the  social  sciences,  separately  and  collectively, 
is  to  be  appraised  at  last  simply  and  solely  by  the  test  of  its  efficiency 
in  helping  to  answer  this  question.  Whatever  may  be  the  special 
curiosity  or  convenience  of  scholars  or  teachers  who  have  a 
chance  to  draw  an  income  by  discovering  or  distributing  knowl- 
edge of  traditional  aspects  of  human  relations,  the  insistent  demand 
of  human  beings  as  such  is  for  understanding  of  the  principles  of 
cause  and  effect  which  operate  wherever  there  are  human  beings. 
This  unconscious  and  implicit  demand  by  human  beings  as  such 
for  knowledge  of  the  essential  meaning  of  the  human  lot  is  simply 
the  untutored  reaction  of  the  human  mind  to  the  whole  great 
objective  mystery  which  conscious  beings  confront.  This  mass  of 
relations  in  which  human  beings  act,  whether  they  will  or  no, 
presents  the  system  of  problems  which  it  is  the  task  of  social 
science  to  solve  in  order  to  be  science  at  all.  That  is,  we  have 
obviously  two  great  divisions  of  knowledge  problems.  Even  these 
two  main  divisions  can  be  only  temporarily  kept  apart.  They 
soon  run  into  each  other.  For  convenience,  however,  we  must 
discriminate  between  the  relations  in  which  physical  cause  and 
effect  dominate,  and  the  relations  in  which  psychical  cause  and 
effect  dominate.  These  latter  are  the  challenge  to  social  science. 
Social  scientists  are  fulfilhng  their  duty  if  they  are  doing  their 
utmost  to  accept  this  challenge  and  to  satisfy  the  human  demand 
for  knowledge  of  social  relations.  They  are  doing  something  less 
than  their  duty  if  they  are  doing  something  else  than  answering 
this  demand. 

It  would  not  be  worth  while  to  discuss  here  how  generally  this 
idea  of  the  business  of  social  scientists  has  been  in  the  minds  of 
social  scientists  themselves.  Whether  they  have  thought  of  their 
work  in  this  light  or  not,  the  fact  is  that  different  types  of  social 
scientists  have  developed  with  very  different  conceptions  of  the 


42  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

sort  of  key  that  would  open  the  most  knowledge  of  the  meaning  of 
human  experience.  Oldest  by  many  centuries  have  been  the 
philosophers  and  the  historians.  In  many  periods  of  the  growth 
of  human  thought  it  would  be  difficult  to  draw  a  sharp  line  between 
these  two  types  of  thinkers.  The  historians  were  philosophers 
and  the  philosophers  were  historians.  In  a  certain  sense  this  is 
likely,  and  it  is  desirable,  to  be  the  case  forever,  at  least  with  certain 
types  of  philosophers  and  historians. 

On  the  other  hand,  it  is  true  that  men  have  started  with  certain 
clues,  or  in  pursuit  of  certain  types  of  knowledge,  and  have  pres- 
ently fallen  into  the  habit  of  thinking  that  their  way  of  prying 
into  the  meaning  of  human  experience  is  the  only  way  that  will 
amount  to  much,  and  the  sufficient  way  to  solve  the  big  problem 
of  social  science,  viz.,  What  is  the  meaning  of  human  experience? 
Accordingly  men  starting  with  slightly  different  interests  have 
developed  such  specialties  as  philosophy,  psychology,  history, 
political  economy,  political  science,  statistics,  sociology,  social 
psychology,  anthropology,  ethnology,  and  a  myriad  of  minor 
specializations.  In  course  of  time  these  divisions  of  labor  have 
come  to  be  regarded  by  their  several  devotees  as  existing  for  their 
own  separate  glorification,  as  having  a  reason  for  existence  which 
is  in  no  way  dependent  upon  the  existence  of  the  other  pursuits. 
Moreover,  the  devotees  of  each  of  these  specialties  have  been  under 
strong  and  often  irresistible  temptation  to  think  each  that  his 
particular  way  of  studying  human  facts  is  the  only  way  necessary 
in  order  to  get  out  of  them  all  the  knowledge  which  the  facts  contain 
about  cause  and  effect  in  human  life.  This  impression  is  possible 
only  so  long  as  the  men  who  have  the  impression  can  avoid  an 
accounting  with  the  main  demand  of  social  science;  viz.,  that  all 
accredited  scientific  activities  shall  show  results  tending  to  answer 
the  central  question.  What  is  the  meaning  of  human  experience? 
To  make  my  point  as  clear  as  possible  I  will  use  an  almost  grotesque 
analogy.  I  hope  its  very  extravagance  will  throw  a  search-Ught 
on  the  matter  I  want  to  emphasize.  Suppose  the  woodcrafts 
divided  themselves  in  imitation  of  the  academic  social  sciences. 
Suppose  they  developed  "axe  science,"  "cross-cut  saw  science," 
"splitting    saw    science,"    "cant-dog   science,"    "plane   science," 


A  PROSPECTUS  OF  SOCIOLOGICAL  THEORY  43 

"chisel  science,"  "auger  science,"  etc.  Converting  grown  trees 
into  material  consumable  for  human  purposes,  is  the  scope  of  wood- 
craft, and  tools  are  merely  instrumental  at  the  points  at  which 
their  particular  specialty  is  in  demand.  A  so-called  "science" 
of  one  of  these  tools  would  be  meaningless  apart  from  the  whole 
program  of  converting  trees  into  consumable  forms. 

It  is  precisely  so  with  the  different  techniques  known  as  the 
social  sciences.  Probably  neither  the  lumberman  who  fells  a  tree 
nor  the  builder  of  a  limousine  who  puts  a  part  of  that  tree  into  its 
final  shape  for  consumption  could  exchange  jobs  with  good  results, 
but  neither  could  function  to  the  full  without  the  other.  So  the 
historian  and  the  social  psychologist,  for  instance  (or  any  other 
pair),  might  each  be  a  bungler  at  the  other's  task,  but  neither 
task  can  be  performed  to  the  Hmit  of  its  value  unless  it  is  correlated 
with  the  other. 

I  want  to  make  the  point  as  emphatic  as  possible,  therefore, 
at  the  outset — and  I  shall  keep  referring  to  it — that  in  attend- 
ing for  a  while  to  the  technique  called  sociology  one  is  not  turning 
aside  from  the  main  business  of  social  science  to  a  curious  pursuit 
outside  the  scope  of  history  and  political  economy,  and  pohtical 
science  and  psychology  and  the  rest.  On  the  contrary,  the  thing 
which  I  am  doing  in  this  course  is  actually  the  sharpening  of  mental 
tools  which  must  be  used  in  their  proper  time  and  place  if  the 
mental  tools  which  are  more  pecuhar  to  those  other  divisions  of 
social  science  are  to  be  used  to  the  largest  advantage.  On  the  other 
hand  the  sociologists  have  no  mental  tools  by  means  of  which  they 
can  demonstrate  the  meaning  of  human  experience  in  any  large 
range  unless  the  tools  are  used  in  co-operation  with  other  tools  in 
the  hands  of  experts  in  these  other  divisions  of  social  science. 

This  way  of  stating  the  case  is  in  almost  direct  contradiction 
with  the  professions  of  sociologists  twenty-five  years  ago.  We 
then  had  more  or  less  resolute  convictions  that  we  either  had,  or 
presently  would  have,  means  of  explaining  human  experience  which 
would  leave  the  other  divisions  of  social  science  either  entirely 
without  occupations  or  with  very  light  occupations.  That  conceit 
must  be  set  down  to  the  discredit  of  a  youthful  zeal  not  yet  chas- 
tened by  much  experience  of  its  own.     The  substantial  fact  to  the 


44  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

credit  of  the  earlier  sociologists  is  that  they  were  conscious  of 
something  lacking  after  the  older  divisions  of  social  science  had 
done  their  best,  and  they  volunteered  to  supply  the  lack.^  The 
sobered  successors  of  those  youthful  enthusiasts  now  believe  that 
they  have  already  justified  their  earlier  zeal  not  by  establishing 
their  premature  claims  in  detail,  but  by  having  demonstrated  that 
there  are  relationships  running  through  human  experience  which 
the  traditional  divisions  of  social  science  had  either  ignored  alto- 
gether, or  had  rated  far  below  their  proportional  importance  as 
factors  in  the  human  lot.  The  sociologists  of  today,  therefore, 
tend  far  less  than  they  did  twenty-five  years  ago  to  follow  the 
ideal  of  separateness  from  other  kinds  of  social  scientists.  They 
tend  far  more  to  emphasize  the  fact  that  all  social  scientists  have 
at  bottom  one  problem,  viz.,  the  meaning  of  human  experience.  It 
follows  that  there  are  different  angles  from  which  Hght  may  be 
thrown  on  that  problem.  Furthermore,  science  of  human  experi- 
ence, in  the  most  responsible  sense,  will  be  developed  not  by 
keeping  these  different  shafts  of  light  separate,  within  academically 
divided  departments,  but  by  allowing  them  to  merge  into  the  pure 
white  light  of  objective  truth. 

In  a  word,  whatever  else  one  may  think  about  sociology,  it  is 
certain  that  one  has  failed  to  get  the  most  authentic  version  of  it 
unless  it  presents  itself  as  one  of  the  necessary  operations  within 
the  whole  complicated  business  of  making  human  experience,  in 
all  times  and  places,  throw  all  the  light  it  can  upon  the  problems 
of  the  living  generation. 

At  the  same  time,  for  the  benefit  of  those  whose  center  of 
interest  is  in  one  of  the  other  divisions  of  social  science,  I  shall 
keep  on  reiterating  this  in  every  possible  variation,  viz.:  It  is 
equally  true  of  each  and  every  division  of  social  science  that  it  is 
an  abortion  if  it  fails  to  correlate  its  peculiar  aspects  of  social 
relations  with  those  aspects  of  social  relations  which  are  the 
centers  of  attention  for  each  of  the  other  divisions  of  social  science. 

One  of  the  things  on  which  the  sociologists  have  put  all  the 
emphasis  in  their  power  for  the  last  thirty  years  is  this  appeal  to 

'  Vide  Small,  "Fifty  Years  of  Sociology  in  the  United  States,"  American  Journal 
of  Sociology,  May,  191 6. 


A  PROSPECTUS  OF  SOCIOLOGICAL  THEORY  45 

their  colleagues  in  the  other  divisions  of  social  science:  You  are 
making  the  mistake  of  your  lives  in  supposing  you  can  ever  build 
up  a  tenable  "science"  of  psychology,  or  history,  or  poUtics, 
or  economics,  so  long  as  you  are  trying  to  make  either  of 
these  departments  of  knowledge  sufficient  unto  itself,  independ- 
ent, a  monument  of  splendid  isolation.  The  phenomena  in  which 
the  professors  of  these  different  departments  of  knowledge  are 
specially  interested  are  not  sufficient  unto  themselves.  They  are 
not  independent.  They  are  not  monuments  of  splendid  isolation. 
Pretended  sciences  of  them  which  in  any  degree  represent  them 
in  these  false  characters  are  to  that  degree  spurious  sciences. 
Social  scientists  of  all  sorts  must  take  this  situation  to  heart,  and 
they  must  find  out  how  to  get  together.^ 

With  these  generalities  presupposed,  I  want  to  prepare  for  a 
certain  bewilderment  which  the  earlier  part  of  this  course,  perhaps 
the  whole  of  it,  is  bound  to  bring.  The  kind  and  degree  of  bewilder- 
ment will  depend  upon  the  extent  of  previous  acquaintance  or  lack 
of  acquaintance  with  general  sociology.  It  often  happens  that 
for  the  first  month  or  two,  not  the  youngest,  but  some  of  the 
maturest  people  who  take  this  course  frankly  do  not  know  what 
I  am  talking  about.  If  they  do  know  what  I  am  talking  about, 
they  are  strongly  of  the  impression  that  it  is  not  worth  talking 
about.  So  far  as  they  can  see,  I  am  merely  fussing  about  words,  or 
about  ideas  that  should  be  considered  too  trite  for  words.  It  seems 
to  them  a  waste  of  time  to  putter  with  these  words,  when  so  much 
more  important  things  need  to  be  explained.  On  the  contrary, 
I  have  the  least  possible  interest  in  words  for  their  own  sake. 
The  initial  objective  in  general  sociology  is  familiarity  with  certain 
cardinal  relations  which  must  be  reckoned  with  whenever  we  try 
to  explain  what  takes  place  wherever  there  are  human  beings.  I 
am  trying  to  show  how  we  may  approach  closer  to  precision  in 
understanding  those  relations.  As  the  relations  are  not  primarily 
mathematical,  as  they  are  not  primarily  chemical,  we  cannot 
represent  them  by  mathematical  nor  by  chemical  notation.  We 
have  no  other  symbols  for  them  but  ordinary  language.  We  are 
obliged  to  select  out  of  ordinary  language  the  best  words  available 

'  Vide  Small,  Meaning  of  Social  Scieiice. 


46  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

for  scientific  purposes;  we  have  to  restrict  those  words  to  certain 
precisely  defined  meanings.  In  nearly  every  case  other  words 
might  be  agreed  upon  to  do  the  same  work.  In  nearly  if  not  quite 
every  case  I  should  be  ready  without  debate  to  join  a  majority  of 
social  scientists  in  adopting  substitute  terms.  The  mere  verbal 
matter  is  utterly  trivial,  but  it  is  not  trivial  to  strive  for  consistency 
and  accuracy  in  the  content  of  our  ideas.  I  am  concerned  about 
words  then,  in  this  course,  merely  as  a  traveler  might  be  concerned 
about  the  checks  for  his  luggage.  It  is  a  matter  of  supreme  indif- 
ference to  him  what  sort  of  checks  the  railroads  use,  provided  his 
checks  always  produce  his  own  luggage  at  the  end  of  his  trip. 
He  certainly  cannot  afford  to  be  careless  about  the  checks — what- 
ever their  form — which  identify  his  property. 

I  insist  upon  this  matter  because  it  is  still  a  fijted  idea  in  the 
minds  of  certain  influential  American  scholars,  even  within  the  ranks 
of  the  social  scientists,  that  the  sociologists'  entire  stock  in  trade 
is  merely  a  jumble  of  words.  This  is  one  of  the  curious  surviving 
misunderstandings  of  the  sociologists.  It  has  had  most  unfortunate 
effects  in  retarding  social  science  in  general.  I  care  for  the  par- 
ticular words  which  I  take  so  large  a  part  of  this  course  to 
explain,  only  as  means  of  calling  up  in  our  minds  the  same  ideas 
whenever  the  words  are  used. 

In  social  science  we  have  in  fact  a  situation  precisely  parallel 
with  certain  aspects  of  physical  science.  There  are  certain 
recurrent,  persistent  characteristics  of  matter  for  which  verbal 
symbols  must  be  adopted.  This  use  of  accepted  symbols  for 
ascertained  phenomena  of  matter  is  imperative  both  for  accuracy 
in  reporting  facts  already  discovered,  and  for  closeness  of  reason- 
ing about  interpretations  of  the  facts.  The  verbal  symbols  them- 
selves have  no  inherent  sacredness.  They  have  their  authority 
not  by  inalienable  right,  but  by  agreement  among  scholars.  If  it 
turned  out  to  be  in  the  interest  of  exact  knowledge,  physicists 
might  scrap  the  terms  "inertia,"  "momentum,"  "specific  gravity," 
etc.,  for  such  substitutes  as  "drag,"  "drive,"  "dead  weight,"  etc. 
The  words  are  merely  the  most  convenient  symbols  for  reality 
that  can  be  selected.  The  like  is  true  in  every  division  of  science. 
The  selection  of  words  to  stand  invariably  for  corresponding  ideas 


A  PROSPECTUS  OF  SOCIOLOGICAL  THEORY  47 

is  not  essentially  a  matter  of  verbal  interest.  It  is  a  way  of  insur- 
ing the  integrity  of  the  ideas  themselves.  This  elementary  part 
of  sociological  procedure  is  simply  one  illustration  which  recurs 
in  its  way  in  every  department  of  knowledge. 

There  is  a  certain  approximate  fitness  to  some  words  more  than 
to  others.  This  may  be  due  to  the  fact  that  some  words  have 
long  been  more  closely  associated  than  others  with  approximately 
the  ideas  which  analysis  finds  to  be  literal  relationships  in  human 
affairs.  In  so  far  as  this  fitness  is  prearranged  by  general  lin- 
guistic usage,  it  is  economy  of  any  science  to  adopt  that  usage  into 
its  technical  idiom.  In  other  cases,  and  this  is  true  in  all  sciences 
in  the  degree  in  which  they  probe  beyond  ordinary  commonplace 
observation,  there  are  relationships  for  which  everyday  language 
has  fashioned  no  familiar  words.  For  instance,  the  words  tele- 
phone, automobile,  aeroplane,  periscope,  radiograph,  etc.,  are 
illustrations  from  the  sphere  of  invention  parallel  with  words 
which  have  to  be  fabricated  in  the  various  fields  of  discovery. 
That  which  did  not  exist  must  have  a  name  after  it  does  exist, 
for  the  convenience  of  everyone  who  has  to  use  it  or  to  know  about 
it.  In  the  same  way  relationships  which  had  not  previously  been 
observed,  have  to  be  named,  so  that  everyone  who  has  occasion 
to  deal  with  them  may  have  the  means  of  indicating  the  relation- 
ships whenever  record  or  exchange  of  ideas  about  them  is  in  order. 
As  in  the  case  of  the  above-cited  modern  words  for  recent  mechani- 
cal inventions,  so  in  the  case  of  scientific  terms,  they  may  be 
awkward  and  hideous.  No  scientist  is  likely  to  waste  much 
effort  refuting  such  charges.  Let  anyone  who  can  suggest  better 
words  at  any  time.  The  main  thing  with  the  scientist  is  that 
the  words  selected  to  denote  the  relations  with  which  he  is  pro- 
fessionally concerned  shall  be  unequivocal,  precise,  constant,  and 
that  their  meaning  shall  correspond  with  an  actually  observed 
aspect  of  the  material  which  his  science  is  attempting  to  comprehend. 

In  the  case  of  sociology  the  most  frequent  vagueness  arises 
not  from  use  of  novel  terms  but  from  our  appropriation  of  extremely 
commonplace  terms,  which  we  try  to  restrict  to  very  closely  defined 
meanings.  Perhaps  we  might  get  ahead  faster,  in  the  long  run, 
by  coining  utterly  unfamiliar  terms  for  the  relationships  which 


48  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

we  want  to  throw  into  the  spot-light.  Either  horn  of  the  dilemma 
has  its  difficulties,  but  all  these  difficulties  are  trifling  in  the  minds 
of  people  who  assume  once  for  all  that  terminology  is  strictly- 
subsidiary  to  the  real  social  relationships  for  which  the  words  are 
merely  the  most  convenient  signs. 

Now  I  hope  I  have  prepared  the  way  for  a  proposition  which 
may  have  a  more  dubious  sound  than  anything  else  that  I  have 
said,  viz.:  This  course  attempts  to  explain  certain  categories  under 
which  all  social  phenomena  must  he  thought  if  they  are  thought 
objectively. 

I  suspect  that  one  of  the  results  of  supposed  modern  improve- 
ments in  education  is  that  such  an  elementar^^  proposition  as  the 
foregoing  carries  no  meaning  to  the  minds  of  any  but  the  excep- 
tional students  who  have  had  special  training  in  logic.  I  must 
stop  long  enough,  therefore,  on  this  proposition  to  make  sure  that 
I  have  made  my  best  effort  to  make  it  commonplace. 

To  express  the  case  in  the  most  homely  form,  we  may  say  that 
categories  are  the  pigeonholes  which  the  mind  uses  in  assorting  its 
knowledge.  They  are  the  receptacles  for  objects  of  thought  in 
which  the  mind  ffiids  identical  distinguishing  marks.  Each  of 
these  receptacles  holds  its  contents  separate  from  those  of  other 
receptacles  whose  contents  have  other  distinguishing  marks. 

We  begin  to  use  categories  such  as  they  are  as  soon  as  we  begin 
to  name  objects.  When  the  child  says  "man,"  "tree,"  "cow," 
he  is  using  categories  of  an  extremely  elementary  type.  The  child 
is  beginning  to  construct  rudimentary  science  when  he  employs 
these  categories  so  accurately  that  he  does  not  use  the  category 
"man,"  for  instance,  when  the  object  to  which  he  appHes  the 
term  belongs  in  the  category  "tree"  or  "cow."  Science  at  its 
utmost  reach  is  in  one  aspect  nothing  more  than  duplication  of  this 
rudimentary  mental  performance,  with  more  elusive  objects  of 
knowledge  as  the  material  assorted.  Science  in  its  most  precise 
and  comprehensive  form  may  be  characterized  as  the  assorting  of 
knowledge  with  such  precision  that  no  "tree"  is  called  "man" 
and  no  "cow"  is  called  "tree." 

A  part  of  the  Century  Dictionary  definition  of  the  term  "cate- 
gory" is  as  follows: 


A  PROSPECTUS  OF  SOCIOLOGICAL  THEORY  49 

(i)  In  logic,  a  highest  notion,  especially  one  derived  from  the  logical 
analysis  of  the  forms  of  proposition.  The  word  was  introduced  by  Aristotle, 
who  applies  it  to  his  ten  predicaments,  things  said,  or  sumtna  genera,  viz.: 
(i)  substance,  (2)  quantity,  (3)  quality,  (4)  relation,  (5)  action,  (6)  passion, 
(7)  where,  (8)  when,  (9)  posture  or  relative  position  of  parts,  (10)  habit  or 
state.  These  are  derived  from  such  an  analysis  of  the  proposition  as  could 
be  made  before  the  developed  study  of  grammar.  The  categories  or  highest 
intellectual  concepts  of  Kant  are:  (i)  categories  of  quantity,  (2)  categories  of 
quality,  i.e.,  (o)  reality,  {b)  negation,  (c)  limit  between  these;  (3)  categories  of 
relation,  i.e.,  (a)  substance  and  accident,  {b)  cause  and  effect,  (c)  action  and 
reaction;  (4)  categories  of  modality,  i.e.,  (c)  possibility,  {b)  impossibility, 
(c)  actuality,  {d)  non-actuality,  (e)  necessity,  (/)  non-necessity.  Modern 
formal  logic  furnishes  this  list:  (i)  qualities,  or  singular  characters;  (2) 
simple  relations  or  dual  characters;  (3)  complex  relations,  or  plural  characters. 
Many  lists  of  categories  have  been  given  not  founded  on  formal  logic. 

But  the  categories  which  the  foregoing  quotation  describes 
are  not  the  best  illustrations  of  the  categories  of  positive  science. 
It  is  hard  to  make  the  difference  plain,  and  perhaps  it  is  impossible 
in  a  few  words.  The  key  to  the  matter  is  in  the  statement  that 
the  above  are  ''logical"  categories,  i.e.,  they  are  forms  of  the 
mind's  action  in  the  course  of  its  reasoning  or  reflection.  The  kinds 
of  categories  with  which  all  sorts  of  positive  science  are  primarily 
concerned  are  forms  revealed  to  the  mind  in  the  course  of  its 
observation  or  perception. 

I  am  fully  aware  that  this  distinction  plunges  us  into  deep  psy- 
chological water.  If  any  reader  is  a  specialist  in  psychology,  to 
him  the  qualification  is  due  that  I  do  not  imagine  reasoning  or 
reflection,  on  the  one  hand,  and  observation  or  perception  on  the 
other,  as  activities  which  are  completely  separate.  In  what  I  am 
now  saying,  I  mean  to  draw  the  distinction  between  activities  on 
the  one  hand  in  which  reasoning  predominates  over  observation, 
and  on  the  other  hand  activities  in  which  observation  predominates 
over  reasoning.  In  the  former  case  the  mind  tends  to  impose 
itself  on  everything  external  to  itself.  In  the  latter  case  every- 
thing external  to  the  mind  tends  to  impose  itself  upon  the  mind. 
As  we  shall  see  in  a  moment,  it  becomes  a  vital  matter  in  all  sorts 
of  science  to  make  out  whether  would-be  scientists  are  actually 
carrying  on  more  of  the  one  kind  of  activity  or  of  the  other  in 
building  up  their  alleged  science. 


50  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

We  may  illustrate  in  this  way:  Suppose  we  are  infants  just 
beginning  to  get  acquainted  with  the  outward  world.  Suppose 
we  have  stubbed  our  toes  and  bumped  our  heads  till  we  have  learned 
to  say  "hard."  We  have  unconsciously  employed  what  phi- 
losophers call  a  "category."  The  generalization  summed  up  in 
that  category  "hard"  is  simply  a  resume  of  our  experience  with 
hard  objects.  We  have  actually  come  in  contact  with  things  that 
resist  our  pressure  in  the  fashion  which  we  refer  to  when  we  use 
this  word  "hard."  Perhaps  a  dash  of  every  more  advanced  mental 
activity  is  already  involved  in  the  activity  which  we  perform  in 
using  the  category  "hard."  Be  that  as  it  may,  our  category 
"hard"  is  essentially  a  summary  of  experiences  which  we  have 
had  in  contact  with  things  outside  of  ourselves.  We  have  done  a 
minimum  of  reasoning  about  those  things  or  those  contacts.  We 
have  principally  given  a  name  to  the  way  in  which  they  affect  us 
when  we  meet  them. 

But  suppose  we  have  grown  old  enough  to  reflect  about  this 
experience  of  hard  objects.  Suppose  we  have  begun  to  philoso- 
phize. Suppose  we  have  asked  the  question:  "Is  this  'hard'  a 
thing  outside  of  me,  or  is  it  a  feeling  inside  of  me,  and  if  so  what 
does  it  have  to  do  with  the  tree  or  the  stone  or  the  club  that  gives 
me  the  feeling?"  As  a  matter  of  fact,  most  of  us  got  the  earhest 
answers  to  questions  of  this  sort  from  other  people,  and  they  very 
likely  got  them  in  turn  from  a  line  of  people  who  passed  the  answers 
along  from  the  earliest  persons  who  ventured  answers.  Suppose 
however  that  we  worked  out  answers  for  ourselves.  It  is  possible 
that  after  puzzling  our  brains  a  long  time  over  these  questions  we 
might  have  hit  upon  the  conceptions  "thing"  and  "quahties  of 
the  thing,"  or  "substance"  and  "attribute,"  or  "entity"  and 
"quality,"  or  "noumenon"  and  "phenomenon."  These  are 
what  I  mean  by  categories  of  reasoning  or  reflection.  They  are 
the  mind's  inferences  from  its  experience,  while  the  categories  of 
observation  are  the  direct  reflection  of  external  things  upon  the 
mind. 

Doubtless  a  logician  or  a  psychologist  would  laugh  at  this  rough 
and  ready  way  of  explaining  those  necessary  tools  of  all  responsible 
thinking,  categories.     Perhaps  the  essential  matter  may  be  put  in 


A  PROSPECTUS  OF  SOCIOLOGICAL  THEORY  51 

evidence  more  effectively  for  our  purposes,  however,  in  this 
amateurish  way,  than  by  more  technical  explanations.  The  mind 
actually  makes  categories  as  its  tools.  The  mind  thus  creates 
for  itself  the  problem  of  finding  out  whether  the  categories  which 
it  makes  for  itself  are  fits  or  misfits  when  it  becomes  necessary  to 
check  up  the  elements  of  experience,  as  the  mind  reconstructs  them, 
by  the  elements  of  experience  as  they  exist  outside  of  the  mind. 

In  his  book  on  the  British  Constitution  published  more  than  a 
generation  ago,  Mr.  Walter  Bagehot  remarked  that  the  English 
farmer  classifies  the  animal  kingdom  as  "game,  vermin,  and  stock." 
These,  such  as  they  are,  belong  in  the  generic  group  "category." 
They  probably  satisfy  the  demands  of  the  Enghsh  farmer.  They 
would  hardly  serve  the  purposes  of  the  zoologist.  The  difference 
between  the  English  farmer  and  the  zoologist  in  this  connection  is 
not  that  the  one  uses  categories,  while  the  other  does  not. 
The  difference  is  that  the  one  uses  categories  which  correspond 
roughly  with  the  facts,  while  the  other  uses  categories  which 
defer  to  more  precise  analysis  of  the  facts. 

But  in  order  to  make  the  proposition  completely  lucid,  we 
must  furnish  an  equally  elementary  explanation  of  two  other 
words,  viz. ,  subject  and  object,  with  their  variations. 

It  is  literally  true  that  neither  practical  nor  theoretical  thinking 
breaks  down  oftener  nor  more  disastrously  anywhere  else  than  at 
the  points  where  it  is  necessary  to  distinguish  between  the  sub- 
jective and  the  objective.  As  the  alphabet  is  to  reading,  and  as 
the  multiplication  table  to  mathematics,  so  must  variations  of  these 
terms  "subjective"  and  "objective"  and  of  the  ideas  which  they 
symbolize  be  to  him  who  would  do  scientific  work  of  any  sort. 

Again  I  am  deliberately  avoiding  technical  explanations.  I 
want  to  get  the  gist  of  the  distinction  expressed  in  the  least  technical 
way.  As  to  the  word  subject  and  its  derivatives,  it  is  only  fair  to 
say  that  the  meaning  which  has  been  attached  to  it  in  modern 
scientific  idiom  seems  more  arbitrary  and  forced  than  is  the  case 
with  most  scientific  terms.  Probably  the  philosophy  of  Kant  was 
the  strongest  factor  in  requisitioning  the  word  for  its  present 
scientific  use.  Whether  we  can  see  any  natural  affinity  or  not  be- 
tween this  conventional  use  of  the  word  and  its  less  sophisticated 


52  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

meanings,  the  situation  is  just  this :  subject  means  the  self,  especially 
the  self  engaged  in  thinking;  or  at  least  the  self  in  the  state  of  con- 
sciousness; the  self  considered  as  a  unit  of  mental  action  standing 
in  contemplation  of  anything  or  everything  else. 

All  the  variations  of  the  term  subject  in  their  scientific  use  have 
this  meaning  as  their  pivot.  "Subjective"  means  that  which 
pertains  to  the  self,  that  which  gets  its  character  from  the  self, 
that  which  is  a  phenomenon  of  the  self,  whether  or  not  it  has  a 
counterpart  in  the  world  over  against  the  self.  It  comes  about 
very  naturally  that  people  interested  in  positive  science  turn  the 
word  subjective  into  a  term  of  reproach,  an  epithet.  They  apply  it 
to  any  assertion  or  doctrine  or  preconception  which  seems  to  them 
to  have  its  source  in  the  person  who  does  the  thinking  more  than 
in  the  reality  about  which  he  is  thinking.  For  instance,  there  are 
some  people  still  who  do  not  believe  the  earth  is  round.  They 
picture  it  in  some  other  way.  Responsible  physical  scientists 
condemn  such  pictures  in  short  order  with  the  verdict  subjective, 
meaning  made  to  suit  the  thinker  himself  rather  than  adopted  by 
the  thinker  from  the  external  facts  (mystical).  So  of  England's 
present  interpretation  of  Germany,  and  Germany's  present  inter- 
pretation of  England.  The  cool-headed  philosopher  at  this  dis- 
tance refuses  to  accept  either  version  without  modification.  He 
says  that  each  version  is  in  a  high  degree  viciously  subjective.  It  is 
made  up  too  much  out  of  the  prejudices  and  snap- judgments  of 
the  national  self  in  each  case,  and  too  little  out  of  cold,  literal 
acquaintance  with  the  facts. 

The  term  subjectivity  corresponds  in  general  with  the  meaning 
of  the  term  "subjective"  as  just  explained.  In  the  idiom  of 
different  writers,  however,  it  does  not  always  carry  the  same  con- 
tent, as  may  be  seen  in  a  paper  by  Professor  C.  A.  Ellwood  in  the 
November,  1916,  number  of  the  American  Journal  of  Sociology. 

I  would  not  be  understood  as  teaching  that  the  subjective 
aspects  of  thinking  are  necessarily  abnormal  and  vicious.  There 
could  be  no  thinking  without  thinkers.  All  human  thinking  is 
necessarily  an  activity  of  human  selves.  The  primary  concern  of 
psychology  is  with  this  aspect  of  the  situation.  Social  scientists 
are  more  immediately  concerned  with  the  tendency  of  human 


A  PROSPECTUS  OF  SOCIOLOGICAL  THEORY  53 

thinking  to  remain  too  exclusively  of,  for,  and  by  the  peculiar 
selves.  To  use  a  homely  analogy,  critics  of  the  methods  actually 
employed  by  would-be  scientists,  whether  physical  or  social,  have 
to  repeat  over  and  over  again  in  substance  the  charge  that  such 
and  such  pretended  scientific  theories  are  like  wine  put  into  casks 
saturated  with  something  that  has  a  strong  odor  or  a  pungent 
taste.  When  the  wine  is  drawn  it  is  no  longer  itself.  It  is 
vitiated  by  the  smell  or  the  taste  of  the  cask.  Our  minds  are 
apt  to  be  to  knowledge  what  the  saturated  cask  is  to  the  wine. 
What  comes  out  of  the  mind  carries  modifications  imparted  to 
it  by  the  mind  which  more  or  less  falsify  these  mental  deliver- 
ances when  tested  as  unadulterated  representations  of  reality. 
We  are  "subjective"  in  this  sense  whenever,  for  any  reason,  we 
hold  to  conceptions  of  any  part  of  the  real  world  which  are  more 
largely  the  presumption  of  our  own  minds,  or  of  other  minds 
from  which  we  have  borrowed  them,  than  they  are  authentic 
copies  of  the  reahty  in  question. 

The  case  with  the  term  "object"  and  its  derivatives  is  precisely 
the  reverse  of  the  case  of  the  term  "subject"  and  its  variations. 

The  "object"  is  anything  and  everything  which  is  not  the 
thinking  self.  The  "object"  is  all  the  rest  of  reality  that  presents 
itself  to  the  self  as  something  to  be  thought.  Whether  the  self 
ever  becomes  conscious  of  this  challenge  in  any  considerable  degree, 
there  is  always  this  real  contrast  between  the  different  human 
"selves"  or  "subjects"  and  the  total  reality  in  which  they  are 
submerged  or  carried  in  suspension.  Now  if  the  "selves"  or 
"subjects"  or  any  larger  or  smaller  number  of  them,  are  roused 
to  inquire  about  what  is  external  to  themselves,  veracity  consists 
in  allowing  or  compelling  this  outside  reahty  to  reveal  itself  not  so 
as  to  confirm  the  prejudice  of  the  thinkers,  but  just  as  it  is,  whether 
the  thinkers  like  it  or  not.  "Objectivity"  accordingly  means 
veracious  representation  of  the  object,  so  far  as  the  representation 
goes.  We  are  having  every  day  in  the  newspapers  vivid  illustra- 
tions of  the  subjective  in  contrast  with  the  desirable  objective,  in 
the  different  official  reports  of  action  on  the  different  European 
fighting  fronts.^    With  rare  exceptions  neither  side  reports  the 

'  October,  1916. 


54  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

occurrences  of  the  previous  day  as  they  will  be  recorded  after  the 
war  is  over.  Each  side  puts  into  its  report  more  or  less  of  what  it 
wishes  the  facts  were,  or  what  it  wants  the  rest  of  the  world  to 
believe  the  facts  are.  Objectivity  would  consist  in  a  literal  report 
of  the  physical  facts  in  their  precise  relation  to  the  mihtary  situ- 
ation which  the  facts  affect.  This  latter  detail  may  be  a  more 
important  item  in  objectivity  than  the  concrete  facts  themselves. 
In  other  words,  "truth"  or  "science"  does  not  consist  merely  in 
statements  of  facts.  It  consists  of  facts  formulated  in  their  actual 
functioning  relations. 

We  might  illustrate  the  technical  terms  "subjectivity"  and 
"objectivity,"  by  use  of  two  identical  Associated  Press  "stories," 
on  the  same  day  in  two  Chicago  papers.  The  head-line  writer  of 
the  one  paper  gave  the  paragraph  the  caption:  Russians  Again  in 
Kaiser's  Net!  In  the  other  paper  the  heading  was:  Russians 
Defy  Kaiser! 

I  now  return  to  my  main  proposition,  viz. :  This  course  attempts 
to  explain  certain  categories  under  which  all  social  phenomena  must 
be  thought  if  they  are  thought  objectively.  Instead  of  enlarging 
further  on  that  particular  proposition,  we  may  perhaps  locate  our- 
selves with  reference  to  the  precise  aim  of  this  course  by  adding  a 
brief  historical  statement. 

For  a  number  of  years  I  have  followed  the  clue  that  the  whole 
evolution  of  the  social  sciences  since  1800  has  been  a  drive  in  the 
direction  of  objectivity.  This  movement  has  been  partly  conscious, 
but  still  more  uncon^dus.  All  along  the  line,  from  men  who 
started  from  the  ancient  disputes  about  the  "philosophy  of  law," 
and  others  who  developed  the  more  modern  "philosophy  of 
history,"  men  of  aggressive  temper,  men  of  critical  spirit,  began 
to  be  impatient  with  some  parts  of  the  tradition  of  their  own 
academic  division  of  labor.  That  is,  men  in  each  of  the  divisions 
of  labor  began  to  suspect  that  the  methods  in  vogue  in  their 
respective  divisions  of  labor  did  not  enable  the  laborers  to  do 
their  best  conceivable  work.  I  am  unable  to  say  how  early  scholars 
began  to  express  this  in  variants  of  the  proposition,  "We  are  not 
sufficiently  objective  in  our  science."  It  makes  little  difference 
whether  those  words  were  used  early  or  not.     The  same  idea  was 


A  PROSPECTUS  OF  SOCIOLOGICAL  THEORY  55 

conveyed  in  many  other  phrases;  e.g. :  we  are  not  accurate  enough; 
we  do  not  get  at  all  the  facts;  we  do  not  find  out  all  the  connec- 
tions of  the  facts;  we  treat  the  evidence  as  advocates,  not  as 
judges,  etc.  The  cumulative  effect  of  these  dissatisfactions  with 
habits  of  thinking  in  the  social  sciences  was  a  mighty  stimulus  to 
more  searching  methods  all  along  the  line  of  social  science.  This 
stimulus  not  merely  reanimated  the  older  social  sciences,  but  as  I 
keep  repeating,  it  created  new  ones.  To  speak  in  more  modern 
idiom,  this  stimulus  to  closer  objectivity  brought  investigators  of 
human  experience  face  to  face  with  new  problems,  and  some  of  the 
most  crucial  of  these  problems  appealed  to  types  of  minds  that 
could  not  work  at  their  best  upon  the  same  types  of  problems 
that  occupied  the  older  types  of  scholars.  Hence  presently  the 
modern  divisions  of  labor. 

Repeating  what  I  have  just  said:  this  impatience  expressed 
itself  most  energetically  in  modifications  of  the  methods  of 
historians,  economists,  and  political  scientists.  After  1850  similar 
movements  resulted  in  the  divisions  of  labor  since  known  as 
anthropology,  ethnology,  psychology  (as  distinguished  from  the 
earlier  "mental  philosophy"),  sociology,  etc.  My  belief  is  that  the 
most  intelligent  history  of  these  developments  that  will  ever  be 
written  will  treat  them  as  primarily  parts  of  one  and  the  same  move- 
ment, viz.,  as  I  have  expressed  it,  the  nineteenth  century  drive 
toward  objectivity  in  social  science.^ 

To  be  sure  this  correlating  fact  does  not  appear  on  the  surface. 
After  1800,  as  before,  scholars  were  starting  with  dogmatic  defini- 
tions of  their  procedure  which  committed  them  from  the  outset  to 
a  high  degree  of  subjectivity  in  the  pursuit  of  their  so-called 
"sciences,"  whether  philosophy,  history,  political  economy, 
political  science,  or  whatever.  But  there  was  another  side  to  the 
case.  Men  in  each  of  these  divisions  of  social  science  were  striv- 
ing to  reduce  the  ratio  of  partial  interpretation  or  erroneous  inter- 
pretation of  reality  which  was  carried  along  in  the  traditions  of 
their  specialty.  While  they  did  not  propose  as  completely  intelli- 
gent methods  of  interpreting  human  experience  .as  the  combined 
scholarship  of  the  present  day  ought  to  be  able  to  outline,  they  did 

» I  have  elaborated  this  proposition  in  Encyclopaedia  Americana,  title  "Sociology." 


56  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

propose  improvements  in  methods  of  research  which  were  directly 
or  indirectly  tributary  to  objectivity.  These  men  were  bursting 
the  shell  of  encrusted  academic  methods,  and  they  were  opening 
paths  toward  free  knowledge.  In  spirit,  if  not  in  Uteral  fact, 
they  were  proclaiming,  "We  have  found  the  Hne  of  least  resistance 
in  the  path  toward  completer  knowledge."  Their  biggest  mistake 
was  not  in  supposing  that  they  had  discovered  a  better  way  to  get 
knowledge,  but  in  supposing  that  their  way  was  the  only  way  and 
the  sufficient  way.  Men  in  each  division  of  the  social  sciences 
fell  under  this  temptation.  Thus  their  very  improvements  after 
a  while  became  obstinate  provinciaKsms  which  obstructed  further 
improvement.  Sociology,  or  as  I  prefer  to  speak  of  it,  the  socio- 
logical movement,  has  been  a  perfectly  normal  development  of 
this  nineteenth  century  reaching  out  after  completer  objectivity. 
While  the  historians  reached  chiefly  in  one  direction,  and  the 
economists  in  another,  and  the  political  scientists  in  another, 
and  the  psychologists  in  another,  there  were  men  who  started  in 
one  or  another  of  these  divisions  of  labor,  but  who  became  im- 
pressed first  and  foremost  by  the  belief  that  the  great  guiding 
question  of  social  science  must  be,  in  substance,  if  not  in  these 
precise  words,  What  is  the  meaning  of  human  experience?  Then 
these  men,  after  brooding  long  over  human  futiHties  in  trying  to 
answer  this  question,  were  further  impressed  to  the  effect  that 
the  Une  of  least  resistance  in  blazing  out  a  more  direct  way  toward 
objectivity  in  answer  to  the  question  did  not  lie  within  the  range 
marked  out  for  themselves  by  the  older  social  scientists.  These 
innovators  felt  that  the  line  of  least  resistance  must  be  in  a  new 
track  of  their  own.  In  this  respect  the  sociologists  were  like 
Columbus.  That  is,  he  made  no  headway  in  convincing  the  learned 
men  of  Europe  that  their  idea  of  the  physical  world  was  imperfect, 
so  long  as  he  stayed  in  their  world.  He  actually  had  to  find  some 
additions  by  which  to  enlarge  their  world,  before  they  would 
consent  to  overhaul  their  theories  of  the  world. 

For  more  than  a  generation  the  sociologists  have  been  dihgently 
reporting  aspects  of  human  experience  which  had  either  wholly 
or  in  part  escaped  the  ken  of  the  older  social  scientists.  Whether 
these  older  social  scientists  are  aware  of  it  or  not,  these  reaches 


A  PROSPECTUS  OF  SOCIOLOGICAL  THEORY  57 

of  human  experience  which  the  sociologists  and  the  psychologists 
have  brought  to  light  within  recent  years,  have  changed  the  per- 
spective of  all  social  science  as  decisively  as  the  discovery  of  the 
New  World  changed  the  outlook  of  physical  science  after  1492. 

It  may  be  helpful  to  express  this  in  terms  of  categories.  One  of 
the  great  turning-points  in  the  history  of  physical  science  was  the 
substitution  of  the  category  "globe"  for  the  category  "disk,"  in 
ways  of  thinking  about  our  physical  world.  Another  turning- 
point  in  the  history  of  science  is  marked  by  the  substitution  of  the 
category  "satelhte"  for  the  category  "center,"  to  express  the  rela- 
tion of  our  world  to  what  we  now  refer  to  as  our  solar  system. 
Another  turning-point  in  the  history  of  physical  science  is  marked 
by  the  substitution  of  the  category  "gravitation"  for  all  the 
mythological  categories  which  had  previously  been  resorted  to  for 
explanation  of  the  visible  universe.  In  each  case  science  was 
promoted  in  two  ways:  first,  by  the  stimulus  to  inquiry  which 
resulted  in  additions  to  knowledge  of  concrete  facts;  second,  by 
stimulus  to  reasoning  which  resulted  in  reconstructions  of  known 
facts,  so  that  relations  between  them  were  more  veraciously  repre- 
sented, (that  is,  to  use  our  technical  word,  so  that  reaHty  was 
more  "objectively"  represented). 

Of  course,  the  substitution  of  a  more  accurate  for  a  less  accurate 
category'  did  not  have  the  effect  of  an  Aladdin's  lamp,  to  perform 
miracles  in  the  search  for  knowledge.  Neither  one  nor  all  of 
these  new  categories  gave  us  forthwith  a  finished  science  of  astron- 
omy or  geology  or  physics  or  chemistry  or  biology.  Each  of  these 
categories  simply  did  something  to  reduce  the  amount  of  blur  in 
men's  eyes  when  they  were  prying  into  the  facts  which  have 
meanwhile  been  organized  into  modern  physical  science.  This  is 
precisely  what  more  accurate  categories  substituted  for  less  accurate 
categories  are  doing  in  social  science.  They  are  clearing  dust  out 
of  eyes  focused  on  social  phenomena,  and  enabling  those  eyes  to 
make  out  more  accurately  what  the  phenomena  mean. 

Perhaps  the  most  useful  illustrations  may  be  drawn  not  from 
technical  science,  but  from  analogies  in  popular  thinking.  The 
categories  "Hberty,"  "equahty,"  "fraternity,"  were  substituted 
for   the  categories   "slavery,"    "inequahty,"    "tyraimy"   in   the 


58  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

minds  of  millions  of  people  toward  the  close  of  the  eighteenth 
century.  These  categories  were  not  merely  political  slogans. 
They  were  not  merely  revolutionary  weapons.  They  were  also 
theses  in  social  interpretation.  They  were  assertions  not  only  of 
things  that  the  people  wanted  to  gain.  They  were  translations  of 
the  human  lot  in  new  terms,  i.e.,  the  human  lot  not  as  it  had  already 
developed,  but  as  those  people  believed  it  was  capable  of  develop- 
ing and  intended  to  develop.  They  were  translations  of  the 
human  lot  as  it  was  into  marching  orders  to  conquer  a  better,  more 
rational,  more  consistent  human  lot  supposed  to  be  latent  in  exist- 
ing conditions.  As  such,  these  new  categories  transformed  men's 
attitudes  toward  the  real  world.  They  made  men  act  less  like 
helpless  victims  and  more  like  capable  captains  of  their  own  souls 
and  architects  of  their  own  fortunes.  These  new  categories  were 
assertions  that  the  human  lot  is  a  foreordained  regime  of  "liberty," 
"equality,"  "fraternity."  They  were  assertions  that  human 
wickedness  had  thwarted  the  plan  of  nature  to  realize  "liberty," 
"equality,"  "fraternity."  They  were  proclamations  that,  if  the 
arbitrary  contrivances  erected  by  selfish  interests  were  once  torn 
down,  natural  forces  would  presently  realize  a  condition  of  "Hberty," 
"equality,"  "fraternity"  among  men  throughout  the  world. 

To  what  extent  these  people  were  right,  and  to  what  extent 
they  were  wrong,  makes  no  difference  for  the  particular  point 
here  illustrated.  It  is  the  universal  truth  of  psychology,  "as  a 
man  thinketh,  so  is  he."  Adopting  categories  which  put  a  new 
interpretation  on  the  world  started  both  the  people  who  accepted 
the  categories  and  those  who  scorned  them  into  greatly  altered 
activities.  These  changed  states  of  mind  have  been  factors  both  in 
the  world  of  research  and  in  the  world  of  practice  ever  since.  The 
same  thing  is  true  in  its  measure  of  every  alteration  of  the  cate- 
gories which  men  use  as  the  terms  of  their  thinking.  This  is  my 
reason  for  believing  that  there  can  be  no  more  radical  preparation 
for  objective  dealing  with  the  meaning  of  human  experience  than 
sufficient  preliminary  attention  to  the  leading  categories  in  use  by 
the  sociologists.  This  is  fundamental  "preparedness"  in  social 
science,  and  it  is  fundamental  preparedness  in  general  sophistica- 
tion about  the  ways  in  which  human  affairs  proceed. 


A  PROSPECTUS  OF  SOCIOLOGICAL  THEORY  59 

One  more  formal  expression  of  what  is  involved  in  sociology 
may  be  added,  viz.: 

a)  The  problem  of  all  social  science  is  discovery  of  the  mean- 
ing of  human  experience. 

b)  The  sociologists  attempt  to  do  their  part  toward  this  dis- 
covery by  contemplating  human  experience  as  a  totality  of  group 
situations. 

c)  Sociological  technique  has  developed  as  analysis  of  group 
situations  considered,  first,  under  the  aspect  of  status,  i.e.,  the 
group  relationships  viewed  as  relatively  permanent;  second,  under 
the  aspect  of  movement,  or  the  group  relationships  viewed  as 
processes;  third,  under  the  aspect  of  value,  or  group  processes 
viewed  with  reference  to  the  t>pes  of  persons  and  types  of  inter- 
personal relationships  which  they  tend  to  produce;  fourth,  under 
the  aspect  of  control,  or  group  process — situations  presenting 
alternatives  for  constructive  effort. 

Any  adequate  introduction  to  the  study  of  sociology  will, 
among  other  things,  furnish  a  content  for  such  generalizations  as 
the  foregoing. 


WHAT  SHALL  WE  DO  WITH  THE  STATE  ?     II 


VICTOR  S.  YARROS 
Chicago  School  of  Civics  and  Philanthropy 


So  far  the  discussion  has  dealt  with  certain  recent  indictments 
by  humanitarians  and  philosophers  of  so-called  state  nature — in- 
dictments based  on  the  foreign  policies  of  the  great  nations — and 
the  criminal,  aggressive  wars  directly  or  indirectly  attributable  to 
those  policies.  The  attempt  has  been  to  point  out  the  super- 
ficiahty  of  those  indictments  and  the  necessity  of  a  very  different 
analysis  of  the  international  situation  than  that  which  underlies 
the  notion  that  the  state  as  such,  or  state  nature,  is  somehow 
responsible  for  the  diplomacy  of  intrigue,  conquest,  aggression,  and 
greed. 

In  the  following  pages  the  alleged  responsibihty  of  "the  state" 
for  poHtical,  social,  and  economic  evils  "at  home"  will  be  discussed. 
Shall  we  abolish  the  state?  Cart  we  aboHsh  it?  Should  we  get 
rid  of  the  evils  and  maladjustments  complained  of  by  hberals  and 
radicals  if  we  could,  and  did,  abohsh  the  state  ? 

First  of  all,  what  is  the  state  ?  A  correct  answer  is  clearly  essen- 
tial, yet  is  hardly  ever  given.  The  proper  answer  is,  The  state  is 
another  name  for  compulsory  co-operation.  A  certain  community, 
or  state,  or  nation,  organizes  itself,  a  government  is  created,  legisla- 
tion adopted,  and  the  individual,  or  the  minority,  has  no  choice,  no 
alternative,  but  to  obey  the  law  of  the  state.  In  the  freest  and  most 
democratic  modern  state,  despite  such  devices  as  the  initiative,  the 
referendum,  the  recall,  local  home  rule,  the  element  of  compulsion 
is  necessarily  always  present.  If  all  co-operation  were  voluntary; 
if  the  majority  had  no  right  to  coerce  the  minority;  if  government 
actually,  and  in  the  literal  sense,  rested  on  the  "consent  of  all  the 
governed,"  there  would  be  no  state.  There  would  be  spontaneous 
collective  action  along  many  lines,  no  doubt,  just  as  today  there  is 

60 


WHAT  SHALL  WE  DO  WITH  THE  STATE?  6i 

co-operation  for  religious,  social,  ethical,  political,  and  aesthetic 
purposes  sans  the  slightest  suggestion  of  physical  force  or  compul- 
sion.    But  the  state,  as  we  know  it,  would  have  disappeared. 

Now,  this  is  exactly  what  the  pacific  and  philosophical  anarch- 
ists mean  by  "aboHtion  of  the  state."  They  would  gradually 
restrict  the  authority  of  the  state,  increasingly  free  the  individual 
and  the  minority,  and  at  last  make  even  taxation  and  military 
service  entirely  voluntary  under  all  conditions.  They  accordingly 
insist  on  the  right  of  the  individual  to  secede  from,  or  ignore,  the 
state.  They  would,  of  course,  use  force  to  prevent  aggression  or 
invasion  by  any  individual;  they  would  punish  "crime" — that  is, 
\aolations  of  the  principle  of  equal  freedom  and  equal  opportunity — 
but  with  the  inoffensive,  peaceable  individual,  no  matter  how  sel- 
fish, unsocial,  umdelding  he  might  be,  they  would  not  interfere— 
except,  possibly,  to  the  extent  of  boycotting  him  and  impressing 
upon  him  the  fact  that  he  is  deemed  an  unpleasant  and  undesirable 
neighbor. 

This  is  the  general  idea  Thoreau,  the  New  England  recluse  and 
intense  individualist,  vaguely  entertained  when,  for  example,  he 
wrote  the  following  lines: 

I  heartily  accept  the  motto  (of  Thomas  Jefferson):  "That  government  is 
best  which  governs  least";  and  I  should  like  to  see  it  acted  up  to  more  rapidly 
and  systematically.  Carried  out,  it  finally  amounts  to  this,  which  also  I 
beUeve:  "That  goveniment  is  best  which  governs  not  at  all";  and  when  men 
are  prepared  for  it,  that  wiU  be  the  kind  of  government  which  they  will  have. 

The  progress  from  an  absolute  to  a  Umited  monarchy,  from  a  limited  mon- 
archy to  a  democracy,  is  a  progress  toward  a  true  respect  for  the  individual. 
But  is  a  democracy,  such  as  we  know  it,  the  last  improvement  possible  in 
government  ?  Is  it  not  possible  to  take  a  step  further  toward  recognizing  and 
organizing  the  rights  of  man  ? 

There  never  will  be  a  free  and  enlightened  state  until  the  state  comes  to 
recognize  the  individual  as  a  higher  and  independent  power,  from  which  all  its 
own  power  and  authority  are  derived,  and  treats  him  accordingly.  I  please 
myself  with  imagining  a  state  at  least  which  can  afford  to  be  just  to  all  men, 
and  to  treat  the  individual  with  respect  as  a  neighbor;  which  even  would  not 
think  it  inconsistent  with  its  own  repose  if  a  few  were  to  Uve  aloof  from  it,  not 
meddUng  with  it,  nor  embraced  by  it,  who  fulfilled  all  the  duties  of  neighbors 
and  fellowmen.  A  state  which  bore  this  kind  of  fruit,  and  suffered  it  to  drop 
off  as  fast  as  it  ripened,  would  prepare  the  way  for  a  still  more  perfect  and 
glorious  state  which  also  I  have  imagined,  but  not  yet  anywhere  seen. 


62  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

Who  will  object  to  these  ideals  and  conceptions?  But  the 
difl&culty  with  them  as  expressed  is  their  strange,  complete  irrele- 
vance to  any  actual  problem  of  which  we  are  conscious  and  which 
presses  for  a  solution.  Suppose  we  accept  the  view  that  the  society 
of  the  future  will  be  held  together  in  the  way  outlined  by  the  logical 
and  uncompromising  individuaHsts.  What  follows  ?  WTiat  is  the 
bearing  of  that  admission  on  our  own  situation  ?  What  practical 
program  is  suggested  by  the  ideal  of  a  free,  state-less  society  ?  What 
are  the  steps  to  be  taken  today — this  year,  next  year,  the  year  after, 
ten  years  hence,  and  so  on — -with  a  view  to  reaching,  at  some 
distant  day,  the  remote  goal  ? 

We  know  what  the  answer  is:  "Repeal,  repeal,  and  again 
repeal. "  Society  can  become  free  only  by  removing  one  restriction 
after  another,  destroying  one  barrier  after  another,  to  the  freest 
human  intercourse.  Free  trade,  free  access  to  land,  free  banking, 
free  issue  of  notes  to  circulate  as  currency,  free  association  for  any 
and  all  purposes  not  inherently  immoral  or  criminal — this  is  the 
individualist  platform. 

Sound  or  unsound,  this  platform  is  certainly  definite.  But  how 
many  of  the  men  and  women  who  are  discontented  and  rebellious, 
and  who  talk  about  radical  changes  in  the  organization  of  "the 
capitaHstic  state,"  accept  the  individuahst  views  concerning  pro- 
tection, monopoly,  banking,  currency,  and  land  tenure  ?  Meta- 
physical discussion  of  the  nature  of  sovereignty,  Kmitations  upon 
the  power  of  the  state,  or  the  natural  rights  of  the  individual  throws 
no  light  whatever  on  questions  of  economics.  So  great  is  the  con- 
fusion of  thought  that  a  man  may  in  the  same  breath  urge  the 
abolition  of  the  state  and  propose  high  protective  duties,  or  a 
government  monopoly  of  coinage  and  currency!  It  is  futile  to 
paint  alluring  pictures  of  a  free,  state-less  society  when,  as  a  matter 
of  fact,  only  a  most  insignificant  minority  is  prepared  anywhere  to 
take  the  first  steps  toward  the  alleged  goal — namely,  to  repeal 
tariff  laws,  banking  laws,  currency  laws,  patent  and  copyright  laws, 
and  a  hundred  other  regulative  and  restrictive  laws  supposed  to  be 
necessary  for  the  protection  of  the  poor,  the  uneducated,  the  credu- 
lous, the  weak! 

The  problems  of  our  period  are  primarily  economic.  The  revolt 
being  witnessed  is  a  revolt  against  poverty,  gross  inequality  in  the 


WHAT  SHALL  WE  DO  WITH  THE  STATE?  63 

distribution  of  wealth,  chronic  unemplojonent,  and  the  like.  How 
many  of  the  radicals  believe  that  ''the  aboKtion  of  the  state"  in 
the  anarchistic  sense  would  do  away  with  these  evils  ?  To  be  sure, 
socialists  of  the  Marx  school,  too,  have  attacked  "the  state"  and 
professed  a  desire  to  kill  it.  Under  socialism  properly  understood, 
we  have  been  assured  in  books  and  periodicals,  the  state  dies,  or 
dissolves  into  something  totally  different.  When  we  analyze  these 
affirmations,  what  do  we  find?  A  totally  arbitrary  assumption 
that  the  state  is  a  capitalistic  device,  an  instrument  of  oppression 
and  enslavement,  and  that  to  aboHsh  capitalism,  nationalize  indus- 
try, make  ever\'one  an  employee  of  the  community,  is  to  kill  the 
state. 

Nothing  can  be  more  absurd  and  empty  than  this.  The  imphed 
definition  of  the  state  in  the  socialist  declamations  against  it  is 
erroneous.  Granted  that  there  is  such  a  thing  as  a  capitalistic 
state,  as  there  was  such  a  thing  as  a  military  and  aristocratic  state, 
it  clearly  does  not  follow  that  to  destroy  any  particular  type  of 
state  is  to  destroy  the  state.  There  is  also  a  democratic  state,  and 
a  socialistic  state.  The  Russian  Bolshevik  leaders  are  Marxian 
socialists,  but  they  have  certainly  not  destroyed  the  state.  They  lost 
no  time  in  setting  up  a  proletarian  state,  as  they  called  their  non- 
proletarian  t}Tanny.  They  dispossessed  and  disfranchised  the 
bourgeois  elements,  but  they  had  the  decency  to  refrain  from  pre- 
tending that  they  were  abolishing  the  state.  They  admitted  that 
they  were  setting  up  a  dictatorship,  a  despotism,  a  state  after  their 
own  heart.  They  had  all  manner  of  excuses,  of  course;  the  dicta- 
torship was  to  be  temporary ;  the  revolution  had  to  be  saved  at 
any  cost,  and  the  enemies  of  socialism  were  wicked  counter- 
revolutionists,  who  deserved  condign  punishment  and  effective 
restraint.  The  intention  was  to  usher  in  a  reign  of  brotherhood 
and  equahty.  to  replace  capitalism  by  harmonious  co-operation. 
Meantime  Lenine  and  his  fanatical  followers  were  to  be  ''the 
state" — and  a  ruthless  state  in  truth  it  has  been. 

Let  us,  however,  recognize  the  distinction  between  emergency , 
or  war,  poKcies  on  the  part  of  sociaHst  or  communist  reformers,  and 
permanent  policies  that  are  to  obtain  under  normal  conditions. 
Would  socialism  under  normal  conditions  dispense  with  the  state — 
kill  the  state?     "No,"  is  the  answer,  if,  as  has  been  shown,  the 


64  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

essence  of  the  state  is  compulsion.  Would  a  socialist  state  permit 
the  individual  to  secede  from  it,  to  ignore  it,  to  cultivate  his  little 
patch,  and  exchange  his  products  with  his  neighbors  without  paying 
the  state  any  kind  of  tax  or  tribute?  Would  the  socialist  state 
renounce  the  right  to  conscript  men  into  military  service,  or  the 
right  to  impose  taxes  on  dissenting  minorities  ?  Where  and  when 
has  any  socialist  author  or  leader  proposed  to  kill  the  state  in 
this  sense — to  depend  entirely  and  unreservedly  on  voluntary  co- 
operation, and  to  base  government  on  the  actual  consent  of  all  of 
the  governed  ?  There  are  individualist  writers  who  assert  that  the 
socialist  state  would  revert  to  involuntary  servitude  and  would 
coerce  the  workman  to  a  far  greater  degree  than  the  capitalistic 
state  has  done.  Let  us  not  hastily  subscribe  to  such  charges  as 
these.  Certain  it  is,  however,  that  the  socialist  state  would  not 
even  attempt  to  dispense  with  compulsion  and  coercion  of  non- 
invasive individuals.  The  majority  would  rule — ^at  least,  in  respect 
of  essentials.  How,  then,  can  it  be  maintained  that  socialism 
would  destroy  statism  ? 

At  this  point  the  guild  socialist  may  be  imagined  as  appearing 
on  the  stage  and  making  his  plea.  No,  indeed;  orthodox  socialism 
is  incurably  statist  and  tyrannical,  and  this  very  fact  explains  the 
advent  of  the  guild  socialists.  They  are  not  juggling  with  words; 
they  are  not  guilty  of  inconsistency.  They  distrust  the  state  and 
would  reduce  it  to  a  minimum.  For  this  reason  they  would  give 
industrial  guilds  the  maximum  of  autonomy ;  they  would  encourage 
the  formation  of  other  associations  for  various  purposes;  they 
would  stimulate  voluntary  co-operation  in  a  hundred  directions. 
The  jurisdiction  of  the  state  would  be  so  limited  that  its  present 
claim  to  a  mysterious  sanctity,  to  metaphysical  authority,  would 
appear  ridiculous,  and  utility  would  become  the  sole  title  of  the 
state  to  respect.  Within  its  sphere,  however,  the  state  would  use 
compulsion  and  possess  sufficient  autl  ority  to  prevent  usurpation 
or  abuse  of  power  by  the  autonomous  guilds,  or  other  local  and 
functional  organizations. 

Manifestly,  the  guild  socialists,  though  sincere  in  their  liberta- 
rian professions,  beg  the  real  issue,  or  at  least  ignore  it.  They  do 
not  propose  to  kill  the  state,  but  merely  to  limit  its  jurisdiction 


WHAT  SHALL  WE  DO  WITH  THE  STATE?  65 

and  force  it,  as  one  writer  has  said,  to  come  down  from  its  present 
"sovereign"  pedestal  and  surrender  some  of  its  powers  and  func- 
tions to  guild  organizations.  Their  plan  may  indeed  promise 
greater  efficiency  than  any  reasonable  person  can  expect  from  a 
bureaucratic  and  despotic  state;  it  may,  too,  prove  more  alluring  to 
lovers  of  freedom  and  appreciative  students  of  human  personality. 
Still,  the  state  would  be  perpetuated  by  guild  socialists,  and  on 
supreme  questions  its  fiat  would  be  law. 

The  syndicaHsts  assert  that  they  would  aboHsh  the  capitalistic 
state  and  prevent  the  estabHshment  of  a  democratic  or  socialist 
state,  but  what  would  be  their  syndicate  if  not  a  small  state,  and 
what  their  federation  of  syndicates  but  a  confederation  of  small 
states?  As  a  matter  of  fact,  syndicalism  is  a  paper  scheme  that 
would  break  down  at  the  first  touch  of  reahty — that  would  spell 
confusion  worse  confounded,  and  sooner  or  later  lead  to  the  restora- 
tion of  a  despotic  state.  As  Mr.  Bertrand  Russell  argues,  the 
syndicaHsts  have  outlined  no  modus  operandi  to  settle  controversies 
among  the  autonomous  industrial  organizations,  or  between  any 
of  them  and  the  consuming  public.  To  afiirm  that  the  syndicalist 
directorates  would  be  at  all  times  amenable  to  reason  and  properly 
regardful  of  interests  other  than  those  of  their  particular  industrial 
group — the  miners,  say,  or  the  railroad  workmen,  or  the  able  sea- 
men— and  that  justice  would  be  done  in  every  case  without  pre- 
judice or  passion,  is  to  revert  to  Utopian  socialism  with  a  vengeance! 
But  even  if  we  should  admit  for  the  sake  of  the  argument  that  syn- 
dicalism is  practical,  all  that  would  be  impHed  by  the  admission  is 
that  the  modern  or  the  traditional  state  is  too  powerful  and  there- 
fore too  dangerous,  and  that  the  time  has  come  to  replace  it  by  a 
congeries  of  small,  weak  states.  For,  manifestly,  the  syndicate 
would  be  neither  more  nor  less  than  a  small  state.  The  syndicate 
would  have  its  directorate,  its  officers,  its  representative  assembly, 
its  referendum  system,  its  rules  and  regulations.  The  majority 
would  govern  the  syndicate  within  certain  constitutionally  pre- 
scribed limits,  and  the  minority  would  have  no  choice  but  to  obey. 
The  majority  might  allow  individuals  to  withdraw  from  the  syn- 
dicate, but  this  right  would  have  to  be  quahfied  and  reconciled 
with  the  requirements  of  efficiency  and  stabiHty.     The  advantages 


66  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

of  such  withdrawal  would  be  problematical,  moreover,  since  the 
seceding  indi\ddual  or  group  would,  in  order  to  live  and  earn  wages, 
be  forced  to  join  some  other  syndicate. 

Syndicahsm  would  abolish,  to  be  sure,  the  "political"  state, 
but  it  would  substitute  for  it  the  "administrative"  state.  There 
are  writers  and  thinkers  who  derive  great  comfort  from  this  antici- 
pated change,  but  it  is  to  be  feared  that  they  are  the  victims  of 
illusions  and  verbal  juggles.  Cannot  an  administrative  state  be 
even  more  tyrannical  and  arbitrary  than  our  political  state  ?  Can- 
not a  trade  union  be  oppressive  and  despotic  ?  Is  "  administration  " 
protected  by  some  magic,  invisible  shield  from  the  vices  and  evils  of 
political  and  bureaucratic  government  ? 

We  must  conclude,  then,  first,  that  none  of  the  modern  schools 
of  thought  really  proposes  to  abolish  the  state,  and,  second,  that 
the  individualistic  and  philosophical  anarchists,  who  would  like  to 
abolish  it,  and  know  exactly  what  is  meant  by  the  phrase  "abolish- 
ing the  state"  admit  that  their  goal  is  very  distant  and  from  any 
practical  viewpoint  Utopian,  since  more  than  sufficient  unto  the  day 
are  the  very  first  steps  suggested  toward  that  goal. 

Is  there,  then,  no  problem  before  us  that  concerns  the  state,  its 
structure  and  form,  its  basis  and  pillars?  Are  those  who  are 
asserting  that  the  state  is  undergoing  profound  modifications  imagin- 
ing vain  things  ?  Does  the  state  require  no  substantial  changes  ? 
Has  it  adapted  itself  to  the  needs  and  conditions  of  our  age  and  is 
it  now  functioning  as  it  should  ?  By  no  means.  It  is  true  that  the 
state  is  "in  transition,"  and  that  vital  and  important  changes  are 
clearly  ahead  of  it.  The  nature  of  the  changes  is  doubtless  indi- 
cated by  recent  developments.  They  are,  however,  often  magni- 
fied and  even  misapprehended. 

In  the  first  place,  there  is  much  confusion  in  radical  minds  with 
regard  to  the  further  democratization  of  the  state.  That  the  state 
has  been,  is  being,  and  will  continue  to  be  "democratized,"  is  a 
truism  nowadays,  but  in  what  sense  is  the  term  democracy  as 
applied  to  the  state  to  be  used?  With  a  curious  inconsistency 
many  radical  writers  advocate  at  the  same  time  the  emancipation 
of  the  individual  and  the  complete  democratization  of  the  state! 
Democracy  is,  however,  very  far  from  being  synon>Tnous  with 


WHAT  SHALL  WE  DO  WITH  THE  STATE?  67 

individual  liberty.  If  a  completely  democratized  state  means  a 
state  in  which  the  majority  rules  absolutely,  and  in  all  departments 
of  activity,  and  in  which  individuals  and  minorities  enjoy  none  of 
the  guaranties  which,  for  example,  they  are  accorded  by  the  Consti- 
tution of  the  United  States,  then  the  democratization  of  the  state 
will  mean  the  enslavement  of  the  individual.  Minority  government, 
oHgarchical  government,  plutocratic  government,  are  severally 
intolerable,  and  embattled  majorities  are  now  rightly  seeking 
to  destroy  such  forms  of  government.  But  majority  govern- 
ment is  not  necessarily  just  or  free  government,  and  within  certain 
limits  the  individual  and  the  minority  must  always  be  protected 
from  majority  aggression.  On  this  point  the  alleged  undemocratic 
features  of  the  .American  system  are  sound  in  principle,  though  no 
doubt  far  from  perfect  and  open  to  much  improvement.  We  can- 
not, in  the  name  of  democracy,  suppress  freedom  of  speech  or  of 
the  press,  or  reHgious  freedom,  or  artistic  freedom,  or  freedom  in 
personal  and  domestic  conduct  up  to  a  certain  point.  To  exalt 
and  free  the  nonconforming  individual  is  to  restrain  and  curb  the 
majority  or  the  democratic  state. 

Again,  the  very  people  who  are  condemning  the  present  state 
because  of  its  arrogant  assumption  of  sovereignty,  its  disregard  of 
individual  rights,  the  individual  conscience,  and  the  like,  are 
clamorously  demanding  additional  protective,  regulative,  restrict- 
ive legislation  in  the  interest  of  the  greater  or  greatest  number,  of 
the  majority.  Send  profiteers  to  prison!  is  the  cry.  License  all 
big  corporations!  Regulate  prices  and  profits!  Stop  hoarding 
and  speculation!  These  policies  may  be  democratic,  they  may  be 
necessar>'  evils,  but  they  are  not  consonant  with  individual  and 
minority  freedom,  with  the  professed  intention  of  starving  and 
eventually  kilhng  the  state.  The  consistent  anti-statist  may  not 
admire  profiteers  and  hoarders  and  food  gamblers,  but  he  would  not 
regulate  them  by  statutory  law.  He  would  trust  the  law  of  supply 
and  demand  in  a  free  market.  He  would  suffer  temporary  hard- 
ship and  loss,  but  he  would  not  sacrifice  personal  and  economic 
liberty.  To  favor  increased  regulation  of  industry  and  commerce 
is  not  to  kill  the  state  but  rather  to  strengthen  it  and  give  it  a  new 
lease  of  life. 


68  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

Assuming,  however,  that  there  are  democrats  who  are  also  good 
libertarians,  and  rational  libertarians  who  are  also  good  practical 
democrats,  the  question  recurs.  What  would  these  do  with  the  state  ? 
How  would  they  improve  it  ?  First  of  all,  they  would  deprive  it  of 
much  of  its  occupation  by  re-establishing  genuine  equahty  of 
opportunity  and  industrial  democracy.  When  crime  and  criminal 
vice  a])ound,  the  state  has  much  to  do,  and  there  can  be  no  talk  of 
killing  it.  When  artificial  monopoly  and  iniquitous  pri\dlege 
mihtate  against  the  equitable  and  wholesome  distribution  of  wealth 
and  enable  the  few  to  exploit  the  many,  appeals  go  up  from  a  thou- 
sand directions  to  the  supposedly  mighty  state,  and  legislation  is 
sought  in  behalf  of  the  poor,  the  weak,  the  disinherited.  When 
conmiercial  warfare  and  tariff  or  other  discriminations  threaten  war 
or  bring  it  about,  the  state  metaphorically  rubs  its  hands  in  glee  and 
knows  that  its  power  and  prestige  are  about  to  receive  coveted 
immunity  from  criticism.  War  and  preparedness  for  war  always 
revi\ify  the  state  and  silence  its  theoretical  enemies.  War  tends  to 
tyranny.     War  is  intolerant.     War  makes  the  state  sovereign. 

Peace,  plenty,  opportunity,  economic  justice,  on  the  other  hand, 
tend  to  weaken  the  state.  Free  and  prosperous  men  do  not  need 
much  government.  To  fight  poverty,  involuntary  idleness,  and 
unmerited  misery  is,  therefore,  to  fight  the  present  state.  Indus- 
trial freedom  will  pave  the  way  for  greater  political  freedom.  This 
is  why  the  enhghtened  libertarian  is  not  today  greatly  interested  in 
academic  attacks  on  the  metaphysical  state  or  the  political  state. 
He  is  interested  in  well-directed  attacks  on  special  privilege  and 
shielded,  protected  monopohes,  knowing  that  to  get  rid  of  these  is 
to  eradicate  much  poverty  and  much  of  the  crime,  vice,  and  bru- 
tality that  poverty  breeds.  He  who  fights  for  economic  and  social 
reform  fights  for  the  emancipation  of  the  soul  of  the  individual  as 
well,  or  for  the  curtailment  of  the  authority  of  the  state.  Flank 
attacks  on  the  state  are  far  more  effective  at  this  stage  of  evolution 
than  frontal  attacks. 

Yet  there  is  no  reason  why  in  some  sectors  of  the  battle  line 
a  direct  attack  on  the  present  "political"  state  should  not  be 
attempted.  The  governmental  machine  is  breaking  down,  and  the 
causes  of  this  breakdown  are  not  exclusively,  though  chiefly,  eco- 


WHAT  SHALL  WE  DO  WITH  THE  STATE?  69 

nomic.  Representative  government  very  often  seems  to  represent 
only  the  tricky  and  seamy  side  of  human  nature.  Men  elected  to 
represent  mLxed  constituencies  often  lack  the  courage  to  take 
definite  positions  on  important  questions  and  "play  safe"  by  trim- 
ming, drifting,  and  pretending  to  be  all  things  to  all  men.  There 
are  too  many  demagogues,  time-servers,  shifty  politicians  (called 
"practical"),  in  the  public  life  of  every  democracy.  Such  men 
have  no  intellectual  or  moral  fitness  for  the  functions  they  are 
supposed  to  discharge.  The  result  is  futile,  insincere,  and 
ineffective  legislation,  evasion  and  paltering  and  endless  delays 
in  attending  to  ripe  problems  that  demand  earnest  discussion 
and  statesman-like  action. 

Even  the  average  man,  who  is  no  philosopher,  is  disappointed 
in  the  conditions  or  prospects  of  modern  democracy.  He  rails  at 
pohticians  and  politics.  He  does  not  expect  efficiency  or  integrity 
of  democratic  government.  He  refuses  to  take  seriously  campaigns 
against  waste,  extravagance,  or  "graft."  He  sneers  at  party  plat- 
forms, made,  as  he  says,  "to  get  in  on  but  not  to  stand  on. "  He 
is  skeptical  regarding  the  success  of  proposed  reforms  of  the  familiar 
type — for  so  many  of  them  have  been  tried  and  found  empty  and 
fruitless. 

This  aspect  of  the  democratic  situation  cannot  and  need  not  be 
ignored.  It  is  responsible  for  much  of  the  sympathy,  interest,  and 
enthusiasm  which  the  Russian  soviet  system  has  aroused  in  Hberal 
and  progressive  circles.  The  Russian  Bolshevik  idealists,  we  are 
assured  by  many,  have  shown  us  the  way  out — have  evolved  what 
Lenine  calls  "a  higher  form  of  democracy"  than  that  of  England, 
France,  or  America.  Let  us  abolish  our  legislatures  and  executives, 
and  "sovietize"  our  state  and  national  governments,  cry  some 
superficial  radicals. 

The  soviet  system  has  nothing  to  do  with  bolshevism,  terror- 
ism, Leninism,  or  the  dictatorship  of  a  class.  It  does  offer  hints  to 
advanced  democracies,  and  its  failure  in  Russia,  which  is  certain, 
will  not  prove  its  total  want  of  merit. 

We  must  make  our  legislatures  more  representative  and  more 
efficient.  This  can  be  done,  undoubtedly,  by  substituting,  at  least 
to  some  extent,  representation  of  industries,  social  groups,  schools 


70  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

of  opinions,  vocations,  and  functions  for  the  representation  of 
geographical  areas,  heterogenous  populations,  and  nebulous  partisan 
policies.  This  suhstitution  is  the  essence  of  the  soviet  system,  and  it 
is  worth  studjing  and  experimenting  with  under  favorable  circum- 
stances. 

There  is  no  reason  why  these  American  states  that  have  been 
discussing  the  possibility  of  applying  the  commission  plan  of  govern- 
ment to  states,  or  of  abolishing  the  upper  chamber  of  the  state 
legislature  and  experimenting  with  a  unicameral  general  assembly, 
should  not  seriously  consider  an  experiment  along  the  Russian 
soviet  lines.  They  might  retain  the  state  senate,  but  provide  for 
the  election  of  its  members  not,  as  now,  by  the  body  of  voters,  but 
by  electoral  colleges  representing  industrial  guilds,  commercial 
associations,  bankers  and  brokers,  merchants,  trade  unions,  pro- 
fessional and  scientific  bodies,  etc.  Years  ago  Herbert  Spencer,  if 
memory  serves,  suggested  the  reformation  of  the  British  House  of 
Lords  after  the  manner  just  indicated.  He  would  not  have  favored 
the  soviet  plan  in  its  entirety,  but  he  recognized  the  defects  of 
Parliament — Carlyle's  ** Talking  Machine" — and  the  necessity  of 
such  changes  in  the  electoral  system  as  might  insure  the  adequate 
representation  of  the  ability,  the  enterprise,  the  intelligence,  the 
character,  and  the  industry  of  the  nation  in  the  parliament.  A  re- 
vising chamber  of  experts,  of  men  who  "do  things,"  who  have  had 
special  training  for  constructive  and  positive  work,  would  un- 
doubtedly give  a  much  better  account  of  itself  than  a  chamber  of 
lawyers  and  poHticians — especially  of  law>^ers  and  pohticians 
nominated  and  elected  by  partisan  machines  and  local  bosses. 

In  addition  to  a  revising  chamber  of  the  type,  suggested,  or  pend- 
ing the  adoption  of  constitutional  amendments  permitting  the 
creation  and  election  of  such  a  senate,  national,  state,  and  local 
councils  might  be  organized  for  the  purpose  of  deliberating  on 
industrial,  social,  and  mixed  problems,  carrying  on  investigations 
and  tendering  formal  advice  to  the  legislature.  Such  industrial 
councils  are  being  organized,  or  at  least  proposed,  in  Great  Britain. 
As  some  enlightened  newspapers  have  pointed  out,  British  progres- 
sives, with  characteristic  sense  and  sobriety  have  modified  the 
Russian  soviet  plan  and  adapted  it  to  the  institutions  and  traditions 


WHAT  SHALL  WE  DO  WITH  THE  STATE?  71 

of  their  own  country,  whose  genius  for  timely  compromise  and 
acconmiodation  is  universally  admired.  It  is  no  humiliation  to  the 
sovereign  Parliament  of  Britain  to  admit  that  it  often  fumbles  and 
muddles  because  it  lacks  scientific  and  practical  knowledge,  and 
because  it  is  hampered  by  partisan  politics  and  supposed  partisan 
strategy.  But,  humiliating  or  not,  the  admission  that  parhaments 
and  congresses  and  legislatures  of  the  conventional  type  have 
developed  weakness  and  faults  and  require  extensive  ''mending" 
will  have  to  be  made.  And  it  is  fortunate  that  sober-minded 
students  of  the  problem  are  beginning  to  develop  a  sort  of  consensus 
of  opinion  respecting  the  sort  of  mending  that  needs  to  be  done. 
Extreme,  superficial  notions  are  being  discarded.  The  silly  demand 
for  the  sudden,  immediate  "  sovietizing "  of  our  so-called  bourgeois 
governments  on  the  Moscow,  Petrograd,  and  Budapest  models  was 
confined  to  ignorant  and  shallow  editors  of  the  yellow  radical  press. 
We  shall  hear  little  of  that  nonsense  after  a  while,  but  we  shall  and 
ought  to  hear  much  about  genuinely  representative  legislative 
assembHes,  as  well  as  about  electoral  machinery  and  electoral  laws 
that  are  intentionally  designed  to  produce  such  assemblies. 

It  is  certain  that  even  plain  business  men  who  would  warmly 
repudiate  any  charge  of  sympathy  with  radicalism  will  increasingly 
insist  on  changes  in  the  composition,  personnel,  and  atmosphere  of 
our  legislative  bodies.  The  complaint  that  "there  are  too  many 
law3^ers"  in  Congress  is  familiar  and  symptomatic.  There  are  too 
many  lawyers  in  every  legislative  body  in  the  United  States.  Law- 
yers have  a  strong  bias  toward  legalism.  They  are  more  adept  at 
raising  objections,  drawing  fine  distinctions,  splitting  hairs,  finding 
reasons  against  proposed  courses  of  action,  than  at  removing 
difficulties  and  making  constructive  suggestions.  The  business 
man  is  right  when  he  asserts  that  we  need,  in  public  life,  more  men 
who  know  how  to  get  results.  We  need  farmers,  merchants,  manu- 
facturers, engineers,  physicians,  educators,  practical  sociologists, 
mechanics,  labor  leaders,  in  our  legislative  bodies.  This  is  in 
strict  accord  with  the  true  democratic  principle;  there  is  nothing 
wild  or  extreme  about  the  idea.  We  shall  have  a  better  state,  a 
more  efficient  and  democratic  state,  when  the  men  and  women  who 
speak  and  act  in  its  name  represent  industry,  commerce,  science, 


72  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

the  liberal  professions,  the  arts,  practical  benevolence,  and  the  like. 
That  state  will  be  as  good  as  the  average  character,  intelligence, 
and  culture  of  the  people  can  make  it.     More  is  impossible. 

Finally,  within  the  limits  of  the  state's  proper  activities — and, 
to  repeat  with  emphasis,  to  demand  more  democracy  is  not  to  de- 
mand the  enthronement  of  the  majority  and  the  abohtion  of  indi- 
vidual and  minority  rights — the  voters  must  be  armed  with  effective 
weapons  of  control  and  defense,  with  the  referendum,  the  initiative, 
the  recall,  proportional  representation,  as  against  their  elected 
representatives.  A  golden  means  must  be  found  between  the 
chaos  and  emotionaHsm  of  so-called  "pure  democracy,"  which,  in 
truth,  has  become  impossible  in  large  and  heterogeneous  societies, 
and  a  too  rigid  system  of  representative  government,  which  has  so 
often  resulted  in  anti-democratic,  anti-popular,  misrepresentative 
government. 

Changes  still  more  fundamental  than  those  sketched  may  and 
must  be  left  to  the  future.  It  is  unprofitable  to  speculate  upon 
their  nature,  for  the  data  available  are  wholly  insufficient.  Mere 
technical  and  mechanical  progress  may  react  powerfully  on  the 
modem  state.  The  further  development  of  a  sane  and  sound  inter- 
nationalism, which  is  inevitable,  cannot  fail  to  affect  the  nationalist 
state.  But  such  changes  cannot  be  foreseen  in  the  concrete;  to 
predict  them  in  vague  generaUties  is  'not  to  facilitate  them.  The 
course  of  wisdom  and  sane,  philosophical  radicalism  is  to  interpret 
and  facilitate  such  changes  as  are  surely  coming,  as  are  actually 
casting  shadows  before  them,  and  as  we  can  afford  to  encourage  and 
welcome. 


EDUCATION  FOR  CITIZENSHIP  IN  A  DEMOCRACY' 


CHARLES  A.  ELLWOOD 

University  of  Missouri 


The  Great  War  was  supposedly  fought  to  "make  the  world  safe 
for  democracy";  while  some  of  us  hoped  that,  purified  by  the 
trials  of  that  mighty  struggle  and  ennobled  by  its  heroism,  democ- 
racy might  become  "safe  for  the  world. "  Neither  result,  however, 
is  yet  in  evidence;  and  those  of  us  who  were  optimistic  as  to  the 
beneficent  results  of  a  victorious  war  upon  our  democracy  and  our 
civilization  must  sorrowfully  admit  the  old,  well-known  truth 
that  war  in  its  effects  is  destructive,  not  constructive,  and  that 
constructive  work  for  democracy  must  come  through  education. 
The  only  way  we  can  "make  the  world  safe  for  democracy"  or 
democracy  "safe  for  the  world,"  it  should  now  be  evident,  is 
through  educating  the  world  for  democracy. 

The  sober  fact  is  that  democracy  is  now  confronting  the  greatest 
crisis  of  its  existence,  and  unless  education  can  do  something  to 
foster  it  and  render  it  successful  it  must  go  under.  So  far  from 
increasing  enthusiasm  for  democracy,  the  war  seems  to  have  had 
exactly  the  opposite  effect  in  some  quarters.  Only  recently 
university  presidents,  corporation  managers,  and  even  poHticians 
have  expressed  doubts  about  the  ability  of  the  people  to  govern 
themselves.  Such  doubts  may  seem  not  unjustified  in  view  of 
the  present  disturbed  condition  of  even  the  most  democratic 
countries.  Democracy  as  a  poHtical  and  social  system  has,  of 
course,  been  successful  in  the  past,  but  under  much  simpler  con- 
ditions of  life.  We  must  recognize  that  the  relative  success  of 
democracy  under  the  simple,  rural  conditions  of  Hfe  in  which  our 
fathers  lived  is  but  Httle  argument  for  the  success  of  democracy 
in  the  complex,  urban  civilization  in  which  we  hve.  The  indi- 
viduahstic  laissez  faire  democracy  of  our  fathers  will  not  work 
today.     Their  simple,  rural  Hfe  demanded  only   a   minimum   of 

'An  address  before  the  Southern  Sociological  Congress,  Washington,  D.C.,  May  9. 

73 


74  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

social  control,  while  our  complex  urban  world  demands  a  maxi- 
mum of  control,  because  social  interdependence  has  been  so  vastly- 
increased  by  the  use  of  many  things  in  common.  The  twenty 
million  people  massed  in  the  great  cities  of  our  eastern  seaboard 
would  soon  perish  miserably  if  they  were  cut  ofif  for  even  a  short 
time  from  the  rest  of  the  country  by  civil  disturbances.  Even  the 
scattered  striking  of  a  few  thousand  switchmen  throws  their  food 
supply  into  confusion.  We  have  built  a  gigantic  material  civili- 
zation that  resembles  nothing  so  much  as  a  mighty  machine  which 
requires  almost  infinite  intelligence  and  good  will  to  run  it  in  such 
a  way  that  it  will  not  bring  disaster  upon  us.  Yet  the  intelligence 
and  good  will  necessary  to  run  this  social  machine  must  in  a  democ- 
racy reside  in  the  people  themselves.  Here,  then,  is  our  problem. 
How  are  we  to  secure  the  intelligence  and  good  will  needed  in  the 
mass  of  our  citizens  to  meet  the  increasingly  complex  problems  of 
an  ever-increasingly  complex  civilization  ? 

Quite  e\ddently  both  the  advocates  of  democracy  and  the 
leaders  of  education  have  been  guilty  of  serious  overlookings  as  to 
the  exact  relations  which  must  obtain  between  education  and 
democracy  in  complex  societies,  if  democracy  is  to  be  successful. 
Let  us  face  facts  as  they  are.  In  a  democracy  the  people  are  the 
masters.  This  means  that  they  must  solve  their  own  problems. 
The  real  sovereign  in  a  democracy  is  public  opinion;  but  public 
opinion  is  only  the  co-ordination  of  the  individual  judgments 
of  the  mass  of  individual  citizens.  If  public  opinion  is  to  solve 
the  staggering  social  and  political  problems  which  now  confront 
our  nation,  it  can  only  be  on  the  condition  that  a  good  degree  of 
social  and  political  intelligence  has  been  developed  in  the  mass  of 
citizens.  To  be  sure,  social  and  political  leaders  may  play  a 
dominant  part  in  the  formation  and  guidance  of  public  opinion; 
but  it  should  never  be  forgotten  that  in  a  democracy  the  people 
must  provide  and  select  their  own  leaders.  They  must  provide 
for  the  training  of  wise  leaders  in  their  system  of  public  education; 
then  they  must  have  enough  social  intelligence  to  distinguish  the 
wise  leader  from  the  demagogue.  This,  again,  makes  the  solution 
of  social  and  political  problems  through  public  opinion  a  matter  of 
education  and  of  the  general  diffusion  of  social  intelligence. 


EDUCATION  FOR  CITIZENSHIP  IN  A  DEMOCRACY         75 

To  put  the  matter  concretely:  the  solution  of  such  social  and 
political  problems  as  the  harmonization  of  the  relations  of  capital 
and  labor,  the  juster  distribution  of  wealth,  a  just  system  of  taxa- 
tion, the  deflation  of  our  currency,  the  reduction  of  the  cost  of 
living,  the  settlement  of  our  international  relations,  the  harmonious 
adjustment  of  the  negro  and  the  white,  the  control  of  immigration, 
the  promotion  of  agriculture,  the  sanitation  and  government  of  our 
cities,  the  repression  of  vice  and  crime,  all  depend  upon  the  develop- 
ment of  intelligent  public  opinion.  But  this  public  opinion  will 
depend  for  its  intelligence,  in  the  last  analysis,  upon  the  general 
diffusion  of  social  and  political  intelligence  among  the  mass  of  the 
people.  Plainly  the  success  or  failure  of  democracy  resolves  itself 
into  a  matter  of  the  social  and  political  education  of  the  citizen. 
Not  until  the  nation  sees  this  is  there  any  hope  of  escape  from  the 
ills  which  now  beset  us.  To  think  that  citizens  in  a  complex 
democracy  like  our  own  can  become  efficient  through  common 
sense  and  common  experience  is  more  fooHsh  and  more  dangerous 
than  to  think  that  efficient  farmers  or  engineers  can  be  so  produced. 
The  problems  which  even  the  average  citizen  in  our  communities 
is  now  called  upon  to  help  solve  are  too  complex  to  be  solved  intel- 
ligently through  common  sense  and  experience,  but  on  the  con- 
trary require  specific  social  and  political  education.  Such  social 
and  political  education,  rightly  conceived  and  carried  out,  is  the 
real  and  the  only  remedy  for  the  unrest  and  the  disorders  of  our 
time. 

But  before  we  can  discuss  wherein  such  social  and  political 
education  for  citizenship  in  a  democracy  should  consist,  we  must 
note  the  impediments  which  still  stand  in  the  way  of  all  education 
in  the  United  States,  and  how  little  as  yet  the  public  mind  has 
linked  the  fate  of  our  democracy  with  education.  We  are  often 
told  that  the  American  people  are  "crazy  over  education"  and  we 
boast  of  our  schools.  How  little  warrant  there  is  for  such  exaggera- 
tion or  boasting,  however,  the  facts  disclose.  A  nation  that  pays 
its  common-school  teachers  less  than  it  pays  its  ditch-diggers  and 
hodcarriers,  its  highest  rank  of  university  professors  less  than  its 
locomotive  engineers,  can  scarcely  be  said  to  be  "crazy  over  edu- 
cation."   We  have  left  our  schools  to  be  dominated  by  petty  and 


76  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

local  interests,  often  even  without  intelligent  central  supervision. 
How  idle  it  is  to  boast  of  our  schools  we  realize  when  we  are  told 
that  nearly  25  per  cent  of  the  young  men  gathered  into  the  training 
camps  to  form  our  national  army  during  the  Great  War  were  found 
to  be  practically  illiterate.  Yet  these  illiterates  help  to  make 
public  opinion  and  decide  public  policies  on  the  complex  issues 
before  our  democracy.  We  expect  them  to  share  in  the  ideals 
which  make  our  nation  great  as  well  as  to  fight  its  battles.  Is  it 
any  wonder  that  our  democracy  often  fails  when  it  confronts  some 
of  the  great  crises  of  human  history?  Until  our  schools  are  at 
least  efficient  enough  to  free  us  from  the  curse  of  ilHteracy  and 
until  they  can  free  themselves  from  the  bhght  of  petty  locaHsm 
on  the  one  hand  and  from  the  blight  of  inadequate  support  on  the 
other;  until  they  can  become,  in  a  word,  agencies  of  national 
efficiency  and  of  national  service,  it  seems  idle  to  discuss  education 
for  citizenship  through  them.  Adequate  social  and  poHtical  edu- 
cation for  democracy,  of  course,  cannot  be  realized  until  these 
prehminary  difficulties  are  met. 

Assuming,  however,  that  these  and  similar  difficulties  have 
been  met,  what  sort  of  education  for  democracy  shall  we  plan  ? 
WTiat  is  an  adequate  education  for  citizenship  in  a  democracy  ? 
Obviously  such  an  education  must  aim  at  creating  social  intel- 
ligence in  citizens,  on  the  one  hand,  and  at  maximizing  co-operation 
among  citizens  on  the  other  hand.  The  creation  of  social  intel- 
ligence is  the  foundation.  If  democracy  means  that  the  people 
must  solve  their  own  problems,  then  ignorance  is  the  deadliest  foe 
of  democracy.  Ignorance  makes  democracy  impossible,  and  of 
all  the  forms  of  ignorance  the  most  deadly  in  a  democracy  is 
sociological  ignorance;  that  is,  ignorance  of  the  laws  and  con- 
ditions of  human  Hving  together.  It  is  this  sort  of  ignorance  which 
breeds  crimes,  revolutions,  bolshevism,  anarchy,  distrust  and 
antagonism  of  classes,  and  even  lack  of  faith  in  democracy  itself. 
Not  that  ample  knowledge  of  social  laws  and  conditions  would  at 
once  and  in  all  cases  lead  to  civic  virtue  and  social  harmony,  but 
that  it  is  the  necessary  foundation  on  which  a  harmonious  and 
well-ordered  social  life  can  be  built  up.  The  more  one  studies 
present  social  life,  the  more  one  becomes  convinced  that  the  evils 


EDUCATION  FOR  CITIZENSHIP  IN  A  DEMOCRACY         'j'j 

from  which  we  suffer  are  more  due  to  ignorance  than  to  malevo- 
lence. Even  in  the  economic  sphere  the  profiteering  of  business 
men  and  laboring  men  aHke  has  in  it  a  large  element  of  ignorance. 
If,  for  example,  everyone  understood  that  our  main  economic 
problem  is  still  that  of  increasing  production  rather  than  that  of 
securing  a  juster  distribution  of  wealth,  that  if  all  incomes  were 
equalized  even  in  this  the  richest  nation  in  the  world,  they  would 
still  be  inadequate  for  a  comfortable  standard  of  living,  such 
knowledge  alone  would  help  to  harmonize  the  relations  between 
classes.  Sheer  ignorance,  in  other  words,  has  led  to  an  unfortu- 
nate overemphasis  of  the  importance  of  the  problem  of  the  distri- 
bution of  wealth,  while  the  problem  of  the  adequate  production  of 
wealth  still  remains  unsolved.  Similarly,  lack  of  knowledge  or 
imperfect  knowledge  is  at  the  bottom  of  most  social  maladjust- 
ments, w^hile  misunderstandings  and  ignorance  are  the  real  causes 
of  most  of  the  conflicts  of  individuals,  classes,  nations,  and  races 
in  our  human  world. 

Said  a  prominent  member  of  the  British  ParHament  recently: 
"A  quarter  of  a  century  in  poUtics  has  converted  me  to  one  creed, 
to  which  I  hold  steadfastly  in  a  world  of  changing  political  panaceas 
— the  belief  that  education  and  knowledge,  and  the  mutual  for- 
bearance and  understanding  sympathy  which  only  knowledge  can 
give,  are  the  only  cure  for  the  social  and  political  ills  to  which 
mankind  is  heir.  We  want  information — a  ceaseless  propaganda 
of  honest  information,  so  that  we  may  understand  the  complex 
and  difiScult  problems  of  the  period  of  transition  through  which 
we  are  now  passing. " 

If  these  words  are  true,  then  the  only  way  out  in  our  civili- 
zation is  through  the  developing  of  more  social  and  pohtical 
intelligence  in  the  masses;  and  the  easiest  way  to  develop  such 
intelhgence  is  through  more  social  and  political  education  in  our 
schools.  Social  studies  should  be  fundamental  in  the  curricula  of  our 
schools  from  kindergarten  to  college  and  should  occupy  not  less 
than  one-third  of  the  student's  time.  By  "social  studies"  I  mean 
those  that  are  concerned  with  human  relationships  and  conditions, 
such  as  the  study  of  history,  of  government,  of  industry,  of  family 
and  community  life,  of  public  health,  of  social  organization  and 


78  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

progress,  and  of  social  standards.  Only  through  such  social 
studies  becoming  central  in  our  whole  scheme  of  education  can  the 
present  amazing  ignorance  of  rich  and  poor  alike  regarding  social 
conditions  and  laws  be  overcome  and  adequate  education  for 
citizenship  in  a  democracy  be  secured.  This  is  the  revolution 
which  is  needed  to  solve  our  political  and  social  problems  and  to 
lead  us  securely  in  the  path  of  progress.  The  trouble  is  that  our 
schools,  held  fast  in  the  bonds  of  a  traditional  curriculum,  and  our 
educators,  bound  by  the  narrow  educational  theories  of  the  past, 
only  touch  the  fringe  of  genuine  social  education.  So  far  as  I 
know,  no  school  or  college  has  as  yet  definitely  accepted  the  edu- 
cational revolution  of  making  social  studies  central  in  the  curriculum. 
Yet  how  we  can  have  an  efficient,  intelligent  democracy,  capable 
of  solving  its  own  problems,  on  any  other  condition  than  that 
social  studies  be  made  central  in  the  curricula  of  all  of  our  schools 
I  fail  to  see. 

Many  profess  to  fear  that  such  definite  social  and  political 
education  in  our  schools  will  work  to  maintain  an  estabhshed  social 
order  and  even  to  sanction  abuses  of  power.  The  reply  is  that  if 
social  studies  are  introduced  into  our  schools  upon  a  scientific 
basis  no  such  effect  need  be  feared.  The  social  sciences  necessarily 
involve  searching  but  impersonal  criticism  of  existing  institutions 
and  pohcies.  They  of  all  studies  are  best  fitted  to  emancipate 
the  mind  and  to  free  it  from  thraldom  to  mere  social  tradition. 
Other  studies  may  be  hberating  and  Hberalizing  for  the  mind,  but 
none  so  profoundly  as  the  social  sciences,  since  they  develop  an 
impersonal  or  scientific  attitude  toward  human  affairs.  If  democ- 
racy means  free  society,  then  they  best  prepare  for  democracy, 
because  they  free  the  mind  and  thus  prepare  the  way  for  rational 
social  progress.  The  truth  is  that  those  who  oppose  social  studies 
in  our  schools  are  usually  those,  whether  they  are  revolutionists  or 
conservatives,  who  believe  that  society  must  rest  upon  force  rather 
than  upon  reason.  They,  in  other  words,  are  persons  who  distrust 
democracy.  Democracy,  on  the  other  hand,  has  everything  to 
gain  and  nothing  to  lose,  from  growing  social  intelligence  and 
education. 

We  should  not  forget  that  alongside  of  the  formal  education 
of  the  schools  is  the  informal  education  of  the  pubHc  press  and 


EDUCATION  FOR  CITIZENSHIP  IN  A  DEMOCRACY         79 

public  oral  discussion,  which  for  the  adult  population  is  even  more 
important  than  the  schools  in  the  diffusion  of  social  information 
and  in  the  formation  of  public  opinion.  It  is  through  these  agencies 
that  the  adult  citizens  of  a  democracy  must  educate  one  another 
regarding  public  questions ;  hence  the  importance  of  keeping  them 
free  and  untrammeled  by  selfish  interests.  If  they  are  kept  free, 
the  schools  will  also  maintain  their  freedom,  and  we  should  not 
need  to  fear  that  social  education  would  become  an  instrument  of 
pohtical  conservatism.  Educators  have  every  interest,  therefore, 
in  maintaining  freedom  of  public  discussion  and  a  free  press — 
within  the  limits,  of  course,  of  courtesy,  decency,  and  truth; 
for  they  are  a  part  of  the  necessary  machinery  for  the  education 
of  a  democracy. 

But  social  education  means  much  more  than  instruction  in 
social  studies,  important  as  that  is.  The  imparting  of  social 
knowledge  and  the  development  of  social  intelHgence  is  its  founda- 
tion, but  the  socialization  of  the  will,  the  maximization  of  the 
attitude  of  service,  is  its  crown.  Just  now  the  world  seems  more 
sadly  in  need  of  good  will  and  of  unselfish  service  than  of  knowledge. 
Any  social  education  which  does  not  eventuate  in  the  inculcation 
of  social  values,  standards,  and  ideals  is  abortive.  But  as  we  have 
already  pointed  out  the  best  way  to  inculcate  social  standards  and 
ideals  is  through  the  scientific  study  of  social  facts  and  conditions. 
Thus  as  soon  as  we  have  ascertained  the  conditions  and  effects  of 
child  labor  we  have  the  knowledge  on  which  to  base  a  scientific 
standard  regarding  it  which  will  compel  the  assent  of  all  reasonable 
minds.  We  have  made  the  mistake  in  the  past  of  thinking  that 
moral  values,  social  standards,  and  even  patriotism  can  be  taught 
effectively  as  abstractions  or  dogmas.  The  right  way  to  teach 
these  highest  things  in  social  education,  however,  is  undoubtedly 
through  the  study  of  concrete  situations  and  problems,  in  which 
these  values  naturally  emerge.  If  so  taught,  there  will  be  no  danger 
that  the  student  in  later  Ufe  will  regard  these  things  as  ''mere 
dogmas." 

The  school  should  maintain  and  teach  the  attitude  of  service  at 
all  times.  This  it  should  do  not  dogmatically,  so  as  to  stifle  indi- 
vidual conscience  and  judgment,  but  as  an  elastic,  dynamic  ideal 
which  will  give  a  definite  social  direction  to  the  student's  mental 


8o  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

and  moral  life.  Self-interest  as  a  basis  for  social  living  has  been 
shown  to  be  inadequate  both  through  the  experience  of  the  past 
and  through  the  study  of  the  laws  of  human  hving  together.  The 
service  ideal  of  life  accordingly  will  naturally  emerge  from  the 
study  of  social  conditions  and  laws,  and  the  school  by  its  discipHne 
and  spirit  should  reinforce  this  ideal.  The  inculcation  of  the 
service  ideal  of  Ufe — of  service  beginning  in  the  smaller,  primary 
groups,  such  as  the  family  and  the  local  community,  but  extending 
to  the  nation  and  finally  to  humanity — is,  then,  the  end  to  be 
sought  in  all  education  for  citizenship  in  a  democracy.  Thus  may 
we  maximize  co-operation  and  minimize  conflict  in  the  nation  and 
in  the  whole  world.  Thus  may  we  also,  through  the  unexplored 
possibilities  of  co-operation  or  ''team  work,"  make  our  democracy 
some  day  so  startHngly  efficient  that  the  boasted  efficiency  of 
autocracy  will  look  small  in  comparison. 

It  should  not  be  overlooked  that  such  a  thorough,  socialized 
education  for  citizenship  in  a  democracy  would  be  essentially  a 
reUgious  education,  in  that  it  would  aim  to  secure  that  consecration 
of  life  to  the  service  of  the  community  which  ethical  rehgion  also 
aims  at.  It  would  be  essentially  a  Christian  education,  not  in  a 
theological  sense,  but  in  the  sense  that  it  would  inculcate  the 
service  of  humanity  as  the  highest  end  and  aim  of  Hfe.  Thus 
social  education  would  find  that  science,  religion,  and  patriotism, 
now  so  often  foolishly  put  in  opposition  to  one  another,  are  essen- 
tially harmonious  and  are  all  essential  in  education  for  ideal  citizen- 
ship. 

It  should  be  unnecessary^  to  point  out  that  such  a  social  edu- 
cation, which  would  throw  the  emphasis  in  education  upon  social 
intelligence  and  social  service,  would  leave  ample  place  for  literary, 
physical,  vocational,  and  every  other  sort  of  education  needed  for 
complete  human  living.  Thus  an  education  which  did  not  include 
preparation  for  the  serious  work  of  life  in  a  vocational  sense  would 
scarcely  be  worthy  to  be  called  social.  Only  social  education 
would  subordinate  vocationalization  to  socialization.  It  would 
exalt  the  social  man,'  the  citizen,  above  his  vocation,  his  physique, 
or  his  culture  in  the  narrow  sense  of  that  word. 

Two  final  matters  of  the  utmost  importance  can  only  be  touched 
upon  in  concluding  our  discussion  of  education  for  citizenship  in  a 


EDUCATION  FOR  CITIZENSHIP  IN  A  DEMOCRACY         8i 

democracy.  The  first  is  the  necessity  of  educating  leaders  in  a 
democracy.  Democracies  are  like  all  other  human  societies — 
they  can  achieve  great  things  only  through  capable  leadership. 
But  in  a  democracy  the  people  themselves  must  provide  and 
select  their  own  leaders.  This  means  that  the  whole  educational 
system  should  be  devised  to  select  and  train  the  most  capable  for 
social  leadership.  This  places  the  main  responsibiHty  for  the 
success  of  democracy  upon  those  higher  educational  institutions 
which  are  supposed  to  be  equipped  for  the  training  of  social  and 
political  leaders,  namely,  the  colleges  and  the  universities.  Are 
American  colleges  and  universities  awake  to  their  full  responsi- 
bility in  this  regard  ? 

The  second  matter  is  the  need  of  a  national  system  of  edu- 
cation in  a  democratic  nation.  Training  for  intelligent  citizenship 
must  be  the  first  concern  of  the  nation,  if  the  nation  is  to  live  and  to 
realize  its  destiny.  Such  education  is  a  national  concern  and 
cannot  be  left  with  safety  wholly  to  local  interests.  It  is  to  our 
credit  that  we  have  devised  a  system  of  government  which  recon- 
ciles local  and  national  interests.  It  should  not  be  difficult  to 
devise  a  system  of  education  also  which  will  reconcile  local  and 
national  interests.  We  need  a  national  minimum  in  education, 
and  Congress  should  pass  without  delay  the  Smith-Towner  bill, 
or  some  better  bill,  to  provide  at  once  a  national  system  of  edu- 
cation as  the  one  indispensable  measure  for  national  reconstruction. 

In  conclusion,  may  I  say  that  we  need  a  deeper  faith  in  education 
as  a  savior  and  regenerator  of  democracy?  We  need  to  reaUze 
that  education  is  the  conscious  method  of  social  evolution  and  so, 
in  the  last  analysis,  the  only  rational  means  of  social  progress. 
We  need  to  see  the  vital  relation  between  democracy  and  education, 
that  both  must  rise  or  sink  together.  But  we  need  especially  a 
practical  faith  in  education,  such  as  will  lead  us  to  match  every 
dollar  spent  for  army  or  navy  or  miHtary  training  by  at  least 
another  dollar  spent  for  our  schools.  Then,  perhaps,  we  shall  be 
able  to  safeguard  our  own  democracy,  and  thus  do  our  bit  in  making 
a  world  safe  for  democracy. 


THE  WAR  AND  THE  COMMUNITY  MOVEMENT 


WEAVER  PANGBURN 
Division  Secretary,  War  Camp  Community  Service 


I 

While  the  war-born  hope  of  international  understanding  and 
co-operation  seems  doomed  to  disappointment,  the  patriotic  forces 
for  unity  set  up  within  nations  still  give  promise  of  bearing  perma- 
nent fruit.  The  United  States  made  a  relatively  small  sacrifice 
in  the  struggle  but  shares  equally  with  other  nations  the  benefits 
of  victory.  The  war  shook  America  out  of  its  provincialism  and, 
like  some  powerful  chemical,  cast  into  more  complete  solution 
the  various  elements  of  its  population.  That  old  southern  moun- 
taineer spoke  with  significance  who  declared  that  the  Hickory 
Division  and  the  Twenty-seventh  New  York  "done  bust  the 
Mason  and  Dixon  Line"  when  they  together  broke  the  Hinden- 
burg  fine.  What  years  of  patient  education  and  exhortation  in 
peace  time  failed  to  bring  about  the  war  swiftly  advanced — an 
enlarged  capacity  for  co-operative  effort  in  good  causes.  The 
impetus  to  the  community  movement  is  the  most  conspicuous 
illustration  of  this  hopeful  phenomenon. 

The  armistice  signed,  public  attention  shifted  from  the  arena 
of  the  war  to  the  arena  of  community  life.  The  nation  functioned 
through  the  community  in  fighting  to  win  the  war;  now  it  looks 
to  the  community  to  conserve  the  fruits  of  victory.  The  patriotic 
motive  has  been  translated  into  a  civic  sense  transcending  that  of 
pre-war  days.  The  great  religious  and  social  organizations  created 
or  enlarged  by  the  war,  now  that  the  soldier  has  returned,  aim  to 
build  up  in  his  home  town  a  community  life  that  will  reflect  the 
democratic  ideal  for  which  he  fought.  Concentrating  on  the  in- 
struction of  women  in  rural  and  isolated  communities,  urging  the 
war  nurses  to  enter  public  health  service  rather  than  private,  and 
enlarging  and  intensifying  activities  of  local  chapters,  the  Red 
Cross  is  endeavoring  to  build  up  higher  standards  of  community 
health.    The  Y.M.C.A.  has  appealed  to  the  returning  soldier  and 

82 


THE  WAR  AND  THE  COMMUNITY  MOVEMENT  83 

sailor  to  carry  into  his  home  community  the  lessons  of  the  service 
and  has  striven  to  find  for  the  soldier  and  sailor  in  every  com- 
munity friendship,  the  church  of  his  choice,  and  some  unselfish 
service.  The  National  Catholic  War  Council  found  easy  the 
transition  from  the  activities  of  the  Knights  of  Columbus  in  the 
training  camps  and  in  France  to  a  full-fledged  social  program  in 
the  community.  The  activities  of  the  War  Camp  Community 
Service  in  organizing  and  stimulating  the  resources  of  cities  for 
the  recreation  of  the  men  in  uniform,  instead  of  diminishing,  have 
been  intensified  and  are  emerging  into  a  broad  peace-time  move- 
ment for  the  general  enrichment  of  the  lives  of  all  citizens.  The 
welfare  organizations  are  continuing  in  peace  time  and  infusing 
their  enthusiasm  into  the  normal  economic  and  social  activities 
of  the  community. 

While  on  the  one  hand  the  spirit  of  industrial  conflict  seems  to 
be  increasing,  yet  on  the  other  the  more  far-sighted  leaders  of  both 
labor  and  capital  are  interpreting  the  business  of  production  in 
terms  of  association  and  partnership  between  employer  and 
employee.  Social  well-being  as  well  as  material  gain  is  declared  to 
be  the  object  of  industry.  Understanding  the  other  fellow's 
problems  and  viewpoint,  it  is  asserted,  is  the  sine  qua  non  of 
contentment  and  progress  in  industry. 

The  war  itself  and  the  social  by-products  of  the  war  constitute 
no  mean  challenge  to  the  church.  The  simple  Christianity  of  the 
trenches  is  in  order  at  home.  Rabbi,  priest,  and  minister  are 
agreed  that  theories,  beliefs,  and  doctrines  must  make  concession 
to  practical  service.  Ecclesiastical  propaganda  must  yield  to  an 
emphasis  on  life,  works,  and  social  justice.  An  enlarged  sense  of 
community  obligation  has  infected  all  creeds.  Points  of  agree- 
ment and  unity  between  sects,  rather  than  points  of  divergence, 
are  emphasized.  The  community  church  appears  less  impractical 
than  formerly.  Personal  salvation,  the  importance  of  the  here- 
after, the  emphasis  on  negations,  many  declare  are  secondary  to 
social  service,  the  urgency  of  the  present,  and  a  positive  gospel. 
Fraternity,  churchmen  say,  must  be  practiced  as  well  as  preached. 
The  democratic  tendency  to  give  laymen  a  large  place  in  the  affairs 
of  the  church  which  was  in  evidence  before  the  war  has  been  greatly 


84  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

stimulated.  It  is  insisted  that  fellowship  should  be  the  democratic 
ideal  of  the  church  just  as  comradeship  was  the  glory  of  the 
army. 

The  appeal  for  more  humanity  in  education,  the  installation  for 
the  first  time  of  courses  in  community  organization  by  many 
colleges  and  universities,  the  re-emphasis  on  community  centers  by 
governmental  and  private  organizations,  all  point  to  the  desire  to 
have  the  schools  catch  up  and  carry  on  into  the  future  the  demo- 
cratic lessons  of  the  war.  A  great  educator  has  declared  that  the 
schools  were  created  for  the  present  hour.  Secretary  Lane  pro- 
posed soon  after  the  armistice  that  in  the  village  communities 
where  he  would  place  the  returned  soldiers  there  should  be  com- 
munity centers  where  the  people  might  gather,  have  their  own 
life,  express  themselves  as  they  desire,  and  engage  in  co-operative 
buying  and  selHng. 

The  stern  business  of  war  strangely  enough  brought  out  in  the 
American  community  unexpected  resources  in  the  spirit  of  play. 
The  spread  of  the  play  institute  and  the  revival  of  amateur  sport 
are  evidences  of  the  new  attitude.  Community  singing  has  swept 
the  country  from  the  Atlantic  to  the  Pacific.  No  pubUc  gather- 
ing, from  a  political  convention  to  a  church  supper,  is  complete 
without  mass  singing.  The  play  and  pageant,  like  singing,  are 
being  applied  to  more  democratic  uses.  General  O'Ryan  has 
proposed  a  municipal  playhouse  as  a  fitting  memorial  of  the  Great 
War.  Percy  MacKaye's  ideal  of  community  drama — -''Splendidly 
and  eflSciently  to  be  neighbors" — has  an  ever- widening  appeal. 
Educators  are  now  interpreting  recreation  as  re-creation. 

The  community  ideal  of  neighborliness  and  democracy  has 
striking  illustration  in  the  direction  that  the  war  memorial  idea  has 
taken.  The  kinds  of  memorials  that  have  appealed  most  to  the 
fancy  of  the  people,  as  well  as  of  the  artist,  are  such  Uving  memori- 
als as  the  community  house,  auditorium,  bridge,  park,  Hbrary,  play- 
house. The  community  house  reflects  the  democratic  lesson  of  the 
war  and  carries  into  the  future  the  spirit  of  public  service  which 
has  been  so  greatly  stimulated.  An  expression  of  the  community 
itself  and  designed  to  serve  local  needs,  the  community  house  is 
to  become  at  once  a  new  home  and  school  of  democracy. 


THE  WAR  AND  THE  COMMUNITY  MOVEMENT  85 

The  most  unmistakable  and  trustworthy  evidence  of  the  com- 
munity movement,  however,  is  observable  in  the  spontaneous 
spirit  and  enterprise  of  the  communities  themselves.  The  general 
impulse  for  community  development  is  characterized  by  an  em- 
phasis on  crying  social  needs,  capitalization  of  the  leisure  time  of 
the  people  for  constructive  recreation,  democratic  organization  of 
the  neighborhood  life,  and  liberahty  in  the  expenditure  of  public 
funds.  There  is  a  surprising  wilUngness  to  make  financial  in- 
vestment in  that  intangible  thing  called  community  spirit. 
Co-ordination,  harmony,  the  elimination  of  duplication  and  over- 
lapping among  organizations  are  the  common  slogans.  Small  cities 
and  towns  give  the  greater  evidence  of  this  civic  awakening,  al- 
though many  large  cities  have  plans  for  great  improvements.  Bir- 
mingham, Alabama,  has  voted  a  bond  issue  of  four  and  one-half 
milhons  for  the  erection  of  schools,  a  city  hall  and  library,  and  a  com- 
munity auditorium  to  cost  five  hundred  thousand  dollars.  Fayette- 
ville.  North  CaroHna,  having  a  population  of  but  seven  thousand, 
has  bonded  itself  to  the  amount  of  $115,000  in  order  to  erect  a 
community  center  as  a  war  memorial  and  in  addition  has  raised 
fifteen  thousand  dollars  by  public  subscription  to  support  a  com- 
munity service  program  that  will  insure  ample  and  wide  use  of  the 
community  center.  The  St.  Louis  plan  involves  an  expenditure  of 
ninety-three  million  dollars  and  includes  the  construction  of 
water  works,  parks,  bridges,  a  great  auditorium,  water-front 
development,  and  the  establishment  of  community  centers.  In- 
dianapolis has  decided  to  erect  ten  community  houses  to  cost 
not  less  than  seventy-five  thousand  dollars  each.  Within  a  short 
time  after  the  armistice  a  council  for  "after-war  service"  was 
formed  in  Grand  Rapids,  the  purpose  of  which  was  to  *'(i)  co- 
ordinate and  harmonize  all  organized  efforts  directed  toward  the 
solution  of  local  after-war  problems,  (2)  work  through  all  private 
and  pubHc  agencies  which  are  doing  or  are  preparing  to  do 
specialized  work  in  any  part  of  the  whole  field,  and  (3)  stimulate 
organized  effort  in  any  particular  field  not  already  filled."  The 
example  of  Reading,  Massachusetts,  where  one  thousand  citizens 
as  volunteers  themselves  performed  the  manual  labor  of  laying 
out  a  tract  of  land  as  a  memorial  park,  shows  how  a  war-created 


86  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

interest  may  fuse  a  whole  community.  Upward  of  one  hundred 
cities  where  War  Camp  Community  Service  was  in  operation  have 
taken  up  the  work  this  organization  laid  down  and  will  aim  to 
provide  organized  recreation  for  the  general  population  as  well  as 
for  men  in  permanent  naval  and  miUtary  posts. 

The  extensive  programs  of  national  and  international  organiza- 
tions, the  spontaneous  impulse  for  civic  development  among  the 
cities  and  towns  themselves,  and  the  concentration  of  fostering 
care  upon  the  more  isolated  and  economically  poor  communities 
by  the  federal  government  point  to  a  better  day  in  the  civic  life  of 
the  nation.  The  permanency  of  this  fine  enthusiasm  and  the 
success  of  plans  projected  will  depend  on  whether  communities 
have  actually  incorporated  in  themselves  the  lessons  of  the  war. 
In  fighting  for  a  democratic  cause,  have  we  learned  community 
democracy  ?  Winston  Churchill  says  that  democracy  has  become 
a  scientific  experiment.  In  helping  to  win  the  war  have  we  dis- 
covered the  basic  principles  of  successful  community  life  ?  There 
is  some  evidence  that  the  outlook  for  the  future  does  not  depend 
solely  on  the  patriotic  enthusiasm  engendered  by  a  righteous 
cause  nor  upon  the  natural  wave  of  humanity  and  ideahsm  that 
spread  over  a  country  which  fought  not  for  material  gain  but  for 
the  freedom  of  the  world. 

II 

The  community  is  not  so  conspicuous  solely  because  Americans 
witnessed  and  shared  in  a  war  of  democracy  against  autocracy. 
Nor  do  we  look  hopefully  to  the  community  inspired  simply  by  a 
vague,  indefinite  sense  of  brotherhood  and  good  will.  Immortality 
is  not  gained  by  an  immobile  worship  of  deity.  Democracy  is  not 
achieved  by  a  patriotic  subscription  of  loyalty  to  the  cause  of 
freedom.  The  prime  importance  of  the  community  interest  bears 
in  on  a  citizen's  consciousness  when  he  has  experienced  a  share  in 
unselfish  and  co-operative  service  in  its  behalf.  We  are  democ- 
ratized by  participation.     A  muscle  develops  through  use. 

The  men  who  actually  fought  in  the  trenches  are  not  the  sole 
spiritual  beneficiaries  of  the  war.  While  it  is  true  that  in  the 
midst  of  heroic  sacrifice  they  were  washed  clean  of  sordid  and 


THE  WAR  AND  THE  COMMUNITY  MOVEMENT  87 

mean  impulses,  and  a  unique  solidarity  and  comradeship  were 
erected,  at  the  same  time  the  people  back  home  were  learning 
their  own  lessons  in  unselfish  service  and  co-operation.  When 
our  men  began  to  return  from  France,  some  writers  with  no  little 
emotional  vehemence  undertook  to  paint  a  gulf  yawning  between 
the  soldier  heroes  and  ordinary  people.  A  gulf  there  may  have 
been,  but  it  closed  without  any  discernible  social  earthquake,  as  the 
history  of  the  American  Legion  demonstrates.  The  differences 
between  the  returning  soldiers  and  those  who  made  them  possible 
were  after  all  not  immeasurable.  It  was  found  that  what  Columbia 
produced  she  could  take  back  to  her  bosom.  The  heroic  and 
democratic  stuff  of  our  soldiers  and  sailors  is  also  in  the  citizenry 
at  large. 

An  immediate  consequence  of  American  participation  in  the 
war  was  to  make  civic  spirit  function  more  completely.  The 
government  fostered  thrift,  greater  production  of  necessary  com- 
modities, the  raising  of  funds  for  war  purposes,  the  entertainment 
and  welfare  of  the  fighters.  While  every  community  looked  to 
Washington  for  leadership,  inspiration,  and  hope,  Washington  in 
turn  looked  to  each  community  for  fighters,  goods,  and  morale. 
The  great  loans  and  other  funds  were  raised  by  the  skilful  utiliza- 
tion of  all  the  community  forces  in  united  drives.  Liberty-loan 
parades,  which  brought  into  a  single  festive  column  representatives 
of  all  the  social  and  racial  groups  of  the  population,  reduced 
prejudices  and  increased  mutual  respect.  What  patriot  could 
look  upon  the  enthusiastic  faces  of  the  foreign-born  or  view  a 
foreign  flag  carried  side  by  side  with  the  Stars  and  Stripes  without 
feehng  a  thrill  of  sympathy  and  good  will.  However  temporary, 
the  money-raising  campaigns  drew  the  community  together 
because  of  the  common  enthusiasm  and  voluntary  co-operation 
they  involved. 

However,  in  the  vast  amount  of  so-called  volunteer  work 
during  the  war,  more  than  in  anything  else,  is  found  the  key  to 
the  increased  capacity  of  the  American  public  for  community 
effort.  The  war  work  of  the  countless  volunteers  in  every  com- 
munity is  as  significant  as  that  of  the  dollar-a-year  patriots  at 
Washington.     In  the  outlook  for  the  future,  what  is  most  important 


88  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

is  not  what  they  did  but  how  they  did  it.  The  self-appointed  war 
tasks  of  many  communities  demanded  the  development  of  no 
little  democratic  technique. 

The  reaction  of  communities  to  the  nearby  concentration  of 
large  numbers  of  student  soldiers  was  a  wholesome  civic  improve- 
ment. Selfish  interests  at  first  sought  to  reap  usurious  profit 
from  the  soldiers'  and  sailors'  necessity.  But  gradually  cities  and 
towns  cleaned  house  and  assumed  for  themselves  the  role  of 
hospitality.  The  eager  throngs  of  soldiers  and  sailors  who  poured 
cityward  were  a  challenge  to  the  heart  and  conscience  of  the 
community.  The  city  became  immediately  a  party  to  the  training 
of  the  army  and  navy.  In  grappling  with  the  leisure-time  problem 
of  the  men  in  the  military  and  naval  service,  commum'ties  learned 
lessons  in  co-operation,  brotherhood,  and  democracy  more  potent 
and  permanent  than  the  temporary  enthusiasm  of  a  war-loan 
drive,  the  sympathetic  appeal  of  Belgian  suffering,  or  the  loud 
acclaim  of  the  glory  of  the  embattled  rights  of  man. 

In  the  presence  of  the  young  men  in  khaki  and  blue,  important 
psychological  changes  occurred  in  individuals  which  in  the  combined 
citizenry  took  form  in  significant  social  change.  The  visits  of 
the  soldier  and  sailor  brought  a  personal  as  well  as  a  social  problem. 
In  the  face  of  such  a  challenge,  a  sense  of  personal  responsibility 
for  the  welfare  and  entertainment  of  the  men  in  uniform  developed 
which  expanded  into  an  enlarged  conception  of  the  obHgation  of 
one's  church,  of  one's  club,  and  of  the  community.  Business  man, 
clergyman,  clubwoman,  artist,  Boy  Scout,  musician,  workingnian, 
Rotarian,  social  worker,  pooled  their  capacities  to  promote  con- 
structive recreation.  Mr.  Business  Man  not  only  served  on  a 
committee  and  voted  an  army  and  navy  clubhouse  but  he  personally 
dropped  around  to  the  club,  chatted  with  the  men,  served  coffee, 
or  sold  stamps.  Mr.  Workingman  gave  unpaid  service  in  helping 
erect  or  decorate  the  club.  The  same  spirit  of  service  inspired 
the  saloon-keeper  in  an  industrial  town  to  organize  community 
singing  as  that  which  impelled  a  conscientious  minister  to  permit 
movies  and  dancing  in  the  church  parlors.  The  ladies  added  to 
their  Red  Cross  duties  organized  entertainment  at  the  clubs,  in 
the  church,  and  in  the  home.     The  tirelessness,  spontaneity,  and 


TEE  WAR  AND  THE  COMMUNITY  MOVEMENT  89 

cheer  of  the  American  women  in  their  war  activities  is  no  less 
remarkable  than  their  capacity  for  organization  and  co-operation. 
Cutting  across  and  uniting  all  groups,  the  community  war  work 
taught  many  valuable  lessons  of  co-operation  in  social  effort. 

The  varied  and  educative  war  activities  of  the  community 
did  more  than  give  an  outlet  to  the  pent-up  patriotic  impulses  of 
all  sorts  of  people.  The  work  of  volunteers  has  given  to  tens  of 
thousands  a  new  spirit  of  service  and  has  enriched  the  country 
with  a  veritable  army  of  persons  of  some  degree  of  training  and 
experience  in  civic  enterprises.  The  spoken  conviction  of  x^meri- 
can  business  that  association  and  partnership  are  the  necessary 
relation  in  industry  has  its  basis  in  the  personal  activity  of  the  busi- 
ness man  in  war  work  as  well  as  in  the  fear  of  impending  industrial 
revolt.  The  Baltimore  business  man  with  a  three-hundred-a-day 
income  who  served  sandwiches  in  a  soldiers'  club  was  being  trained 
for  the  personal  relation  in  industry^  In  the  temporary  alliances 
of  war  work  an  understanding  developed  that  may  yet  become  the 
basis  for  permanent  harmonious  relationships.  A  widespread 
though  not  always  articulate  spirit  of  social  service  exists.  Sharp 
lines  of  social,  religious,  and  racial  cleavage  have  to  a  degree 
faded. 

The  development  and  outlook  of  the  returned  soldier  and  sailor 
have  also  had  a  wholesome  influence  on  the  community  mind. 
The  folks  at  home  understand  that  the  soldier  and  sailor  have  had  a 
unique  and  broadening  experience.  The  draft  brought  into  the 
military  organization  a  remarkable  cosmopolitanism.  Many  an 
outfit  learned  its  Americanism  in  the  trenches.  Army  life  was  a 
liberal  education  because  it  provided  each  man  with  the  technical 
training  of  warfare  and  the  cultural  influences  of  music,  drama, 
reading,  religion,  and  social  intercourse  in  camp  and  city.  How- 
ever, the  chief  lesson  that  the  soldier  and  sailor  themselves  say 
they  have  learned  alike  from  the  monotonous  grind  of  the  training 
camp  and  the  acutely  poignant  trial  of  battle  is  that  of  comrade- 
ship. Returned  to  civil  hfe,  they  mean  to  have  a  part  in  building 
a  new  humanity  on  the  basis  of  the  fine  fraternity  of  the  miUtary 
and  naval  Hfe.  This  point  of  view  is  having  no  uncertain  influence 
on  the  community  in  this  period  of  reconstruction. 


90  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

The  imaginative  recreation  so  generously  utilized  everywhere 
has  had  a  great  influence  in  the  community.  Mass  singing  has 
served  to  melt  the  ice  of  civic  indifference  and  has  become  the  fore- 
runner of  co-operative  activities  of  more  substantial  character. 
"People  act  less  on  reasoned  conviction  than  on  the  spur  of 
emotional  or  instinctive  attitudes."  The  harmony  of  large  diverse 
groups  singing  with  one  purpose  results  in  united  civic  activities. 
Community  drama,  pageantry,  and  amateur  theatricals  have  also 
had  their  socializing  influence. 

Paradoxical  as  it  may  seem,  the  spirit  of  play  was  abroad  in 
the  land  far  more  during  the  war  than  before.  This  was  the  result 
of  the  camp  athletic  games  and  the  attempt  of  the  community  to 
provide  recreation  for  the  soldier  and  the  sailor.  The  community 
not  only  provided  athletic  contests,  games,  parties,  and  dances,  but 
participated  in  these  activities  with  their  soldier  and  sailor  guests. 
Joining  in  the  game  had  the  same  fine  socializing  effect  as  com- 
munity singing.  Team  play,  harmony,  brotherliness,  and  co- 
operation were  the  visible  effects.  Understanding,  sympathy, 
postponement  of  individual  to  collective  ends  are  the  social  by- 
products of  collective  play. 

The  popularity  of  the  community  house  as  a  memorial  is  partly 
accounted  for  by  the  popularity  of  the  soldiers'  club  the  country 
over.  The  club  in  town  and  the  hut  at  camp  came  to  represent 
warmth,  good  cheer,  camaraderie,  and  the  spirit  of  brotherhood. 
They  had  something  of  the  home  touch.  Returned  from  the 
service  the  soldier  and  sailor  naturally  favor  a  permanent  institu- 
tion of  a  similar  character.  The  community,  too,  became 
accustomed  to  the  club  as  a  common  gathering  place,  since  it  was 
there  they  assembled  to  entertain  the  men  in  the  service.  More- 
over, the  club  represented  the  labor  and  the  love  of  the  many 
different  groups  who  had  a  part  in  making  it  possible.  An  invest- 
ment in  a  common  house  for  the  whole  citizenship  is  a  logical 
consequence  of  an  investment  in  a  club  for  a  part  of  the  citizen- 
ship that  had  donned  the  uniform.  An  additional  cause  of  popu- 
larity of  the  community  house  is  the  powerful  conviction  that 
such  a  building  is  most  symbolic  of  a  living  democracy  and  of  the 
American  spirit  in  the  war. 


THE  WAR  AND  THE  COMMUNITY  MOVEMENT  91 

The  patriotic  spirit  in  the  country  was  not  always  articulate, 
not  always  well  directed.  Hospitable  impulses  and  efforts  were 
often  wasted  in  overlapping.  However,  the  government  set  in 
motion  in  the  community  civilian  agencies  which  helped  to  make 
practical  and  productive  the  spontaneous  spirit  of  service  without 
superimposing  authority  or  crushing  initiative.  The  War  Camp 
Community  Service,  in  particular,  functioned  as  a  co-ordinating 
and  stimulating  agency,  a  clearing  house  for  recreational  activities 
provided  for  the  soldier  and  sailor.  A  non-sectarian,  non-partisan 
agency,  it  was  able  to  teach  many  communities  the  art  of  doing 
things  together  with  dispatch  and  effectiveness.  It  could  not 
create  community  spirit,  but  it  helped  the  community  to  apply  it. 

No  institution  worth  the  name  in  the  community  but  has  felt 
the  impress  of  an  enlarged  community  sense.  The  church  could 
not  but  be  stirred  to  self-examination  as  it  was  drawn  more  and 
more  into  the  community  activities  of  war  work.  The  direct 
contacts  of  the  Y.M.C.A.,  Knights  of  Columbus,  and  the  Jewish 
Welfare  Board — the  agencies  of  the  church — with  the  men  in 
the  service  contributed  immensely  to  the  lesson.  No  chamber  of 
commerce  could  meet  the  innumerable  calls  of  the  community 
without  enlarging  its  social  ideals.  No  club  could  open  its  doors 
to  the  soldier  and  sailor  or  promote  a  liberty  loan  without  imbibing 
some  of  the  spirit  of  a  larger  brotherhood.  No  refined  home 
could  receive  an  awkward,  rough-shod  farmer  lad  without  being 
drawn  closer  to  him  and  his  kind.  War  activities  made  for  practi- 
cal neighborhness. 

The  country  has  begun  reconstruction  with  a  generous  force  of 
community  spirit  which  will  make  for  sanity,  safety,  and  enhanced 
national  efficiency  if  utilized.  Shall  the  rich  resources  of  trained 
personality  in  every  community  be  demobilized  and  dismissed  ? 
Shall  the  spirit  of  unity  and  brotherhood  go  to  waste?  W'ill  the 
warm  impulses  for  service,  which  the  war  stirred  in  so  many  people, 
be  permitted  to  dry  up  ? 

Ill 

The  intelligent  application  of  the  war-inspired  enthusiasm  and 
fervor  for  the  community  good  to  a  sane  program  is  the  urgent 
task  of  the  present.     Far  too  many  citizens,  faihng  the  glamor 


92  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

and  romance  of  the  war  motive,  have  already  relapsed  into  pre- 
war indifference.  Wisely  guided,  the  spirit  of  neighborliness  will 
not  vanish  into  thin  air  but  will  crystallize  in  substantial  opportuni- 
ties for  a  larger  life  for  the  average  citizen. 

A  practical  plan  of  community  service  must  have  its  chief 
inspiration  and  support  not  in  a  superimposed  program  but  in 
local  initiative.  While  many  isolated  and  socially  and  economically 
poor  communities  will  welcome  a  community  service  institute 
sent  out  by  the  state  government,  yet  the  towns  and  cities  and 
even  some  rural  districts  will  be  averse  to  outside  interference. 
In  the  main,  each  community  must  work  out  its  own  salvation. 
Local  pride  has  been  accentuated  by  the  self-revelation  brought 
about  by  war  activities.  A  central  and  stimulating  agency  there 
may  be,  which  will  circulate  successful  ideas  and  methods  or  even 
furnish  skilled  community  workers  on  request.  But  the  ser\ace 
of  the  clearing-house  cannot  be  thrust  upon  the  community. 

Community  action  must  be  as  practical  as  it  is  spontaneous. 
The  basis  of  community  service  must  be  organized  friendship. 
Many  cities  that  have  a  wealth  of  institutions,  agencies,  and 
societies  that  represent  the  finest  motives  of  Christian  spirit  and 
friendship  seldom  have  effected  co-ordination  and  co-operation. 
They  work  at  cross-purposes,  overlap,  waste  effort.  The  basis  of 
team  success  is  the  absolute  performance  by  each  member  of  the 
duty  assigned  him.  The  secret  of  a  real  neighborhood  life  is  the 
acceptance  of  the  personal  responsibilities  for  which  each  indi- 
vidual is  peculiarly  qualified. 

The  objective  of  the  community  movement  is,  briefly  put,  a 
larger  life  for  everybody.  It  means  better  moral,  industrial,  and 
social  conditions,  more  production  and  productivity,  more  play 
and  recreation,  better  health  and  better  education,  more  adequate 
neighborhood  expression.  It  means  Americanization  that  will 
teach  American  ideas,  customs,  standards  of  living,  democratic 
traditions,  and  social  life  as  well  as  the  English  language.  Com- 
munity service  may  not  fuse  eccleciastical  organizations  but  it 
can  unite  churches  in  a  wide  range  of  community  projects  that 
imperil  no  special  religious  doctrine.  The  community  will  work 
for  a  healthful  and  profitable  use  of  leisure  time,  by  the  provision 


THE  WAR  AND  THE  COMMUNITY  MOVEMENT  93 

of  parks,  playgrounds,  baths,  municipal  playhouses,  community 
houses,  museums,  art  galleries,  libraries,  band  concerts,  community 
singing,  and  pageants.  The  joint  consideration  of  housing  con- 
ditions, health,  and  employment  may  lead  quickly  to  the  orderly 
and  friendly  consideration  and  settlement  of  problems  of  wages, 
hours,  profit-sharing,  industrial  management,  and  partnership. 

The  attainment  of  such  an  objective  calls  for  a  facile  and 
adaptable  organization  of  community  resources.  No  organization 
of  an  institutional  character  can  organize  community  spirit  and 
make  it  function  in  practical  ways.  The  first  instinct  of  an  institu- 
tion is  self-perpetuation.  It  demands  a  loyalty  to  itself  that 
ultimately  narrows  its  possibilities.  It  is  essentially  conservative 
and  static.  Only  a  community  agency  can  successfully  co-ordinate 
and  stimulate  community  activity.  It  must  aim  at  service,  results; 
be  content  to  accomplish  in  the  name  of  other  organizations;  be 
dynamic,  progressive,  objective.  It  must  guide,  rather  than  domi- 
nate; point  the  way,  suggest;  act  as  a  clearing-house  for  practical 
ideas  from  without;  dispense  methods,  not  means.  It  cannot  create 
community  spirit,  but  can  harness  that  spirit  to  practical  pro- 
grams. The  community  agency  is  the  transformer  into  which  is 
poured  the  combined  genius  and  social  force  of  the  community  and 
from  which  issues  forth  forms  of  practical  service  that  warm  and 
brighten  the  life  of  every  citizen. 

Whatever  the  name  or  character  of  the  agency,  it  must  be 
representative.  In  cosmopolitan  and  heterogeneous  neighbor- 
hoods, an  organization  of  sectarian,  political,  or  social  bias  is 
obviously  impractical.  A  truly  representative  body  is  practical 
in  any  community;  that  the  war  demonstrated.  The  community 
committee,  commission,  or  council,  representing  the  humblest  as 
well  as  the  proudest,  may  approach  any  problem  fearlessly  and 
openly.  It  seeks  through  the  community  to  do  the  practical 
things  that  make  for  human  happiness.  Municipal  legislation  as 
well  as  private  initiative  are  its  tools.  It  utilizes  existing  social 
machinery  and  creates  new  machinery  only  when  necessary.  The 
school,  the  community  center,  the  church,  the  association,  the  club, 
the  home,  the  individual  are  the  working  members  of  the  great 
community  team. 


94  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

Unless  the  schools,  in  their  teaching,  catch  up  the  new  ideals 
of  association  and  neighborliness,  community  spirit  will  eventually 
die.  The  old  individualistic  ideals  must  not  be  instilled  into  the 
minds  of  the  pupils  to  the  exclusion  of  the  new  conception  of  the 
necessity  and  glory  of  co-operative  action.  Each  child  must 
grow  up  realizing  that  he  is  a  responsible  member  of  a  neighbor- 
hood and  must  be  taught  the  how  as  well  as  the  why  of  community 
service.  The  community  center  should  inculcate  citizenship  in 
terms  of  civic  activity,  an  American  attitude  of  mind,  and  a  well- 
rounded  life  as  well  as  in  terms  of  the  three  R's. 

A  well-rounded  life  has  its  play  time.  Recreation  as  an  end 
in  itself  and  as  an  approach  to  more  vital  social  developments  has 
come  to  stay.  Community  singing,  plays,  pageantry,  and  physical 
recreation  must  be  stimulated  among  adults  as  well  as  among  the 
youth.  The  outlet  to  physical  and  moral  energy  that  the  play  of 
the  camp  and  the  game  of  warfare  furnished  the  soldier  and  sailor 
must  hereafter  be  provided  the  average  citizen  through  con- 
structive relaxation.  Physical  sport  and  imaginative  recreation 
helped  to  produce  good  soldiers.  They  will  help  to  make  good 
citizens. 

The  church,  the  club,  and  the  association  as  well  as  the  school 
must  prepare  to  play  a  larger  part  in  the  community  life  than  they 
have  heretofore.  They  must  participate  directly  in  many  of  the 
everyday  problems  of  the  everyday  man  and  inspire  their  individual 
constituents  to  activity  in  others.  While  the  church  cannot  trans- 
form itself  into  a  settlement  or  nursery  and  continue  to  fulfill  its 
own  distinctive  mission,  yet  it  can  have  a  large  part  in  making  the 
community  function  through  its  influence  and  teaching.  The  busi- 
ness men's  association,  the  social  club,  the  Grange,  must  broaden 
their  activities  to  include  adherent  as  well  as  inherent  community 
interests.  In  community  service,  every  participating  organization 
will  find  a  larger  life;  they  will  not  be  cramped  or  restricted. 
Neighborliness  pays. 

Says  Mazzini:  "We  must  make  ourselves  strong  and  great 
again  by  association."  The  war  has  created  the  sentiment  for 
unity  and  fraternity  and  has  revealed  the  method.  Its  termination 
has  released  rich  resources  in  dedicated  personality  which  have 


THE  WAR  AND  THE  COMMUNITY  MOVEMENT  95 

the  power  to  make  civic  achievement  possible.  The  time  is  ripe 
for  community  service.  All  political  creeds,  social  groups,  reli- 
gious sects  agree  to  it  in  principle.  The  approval  of  both  labor 
and  capital  is  a  safe  guaranty  of  its  success,  if  wisely  handled.  If 
an  autonomous  expression  of  the  community  conscience,  functioning 
through  a  representative  agency  and  projecting  a  practical  program, 
it  will  operate  successfully.  It  should  tend  to  make  more  articulate 
the  desires  and  aspirations  of  the  common  people  and  help  them 
to  realization.  It  should  teach  the  lesson  of  mutual  responsibihty 
and  brotherhood.  It  should  interpret  each  group  of  the  community 
to  every  other  group.  It  should  utiUze  to  the  full  the  newly  dis- 
covered capacities  of  that  great  body  of  citizens  who  labored  in  war 
work  at  home  and  also  of  the  men  who  defended  the  nation's  honor 
on  land  and  sea.  It  should  make  for  stabihty,  justice,  neighborli- 
ness.  It  should  do  its  work  so  well  that  ultimately  it  will  cease 
to  have  need  for  existence  because  it  will  have  taught  the  govern- 
ment how  to  function  fully  in  every  phase  of  community  life. 


STUDENTS'  DISSERTATIONS  IN 
SOCIOLOGY 

The  following  list  of  doctoral  dissertations  and  Masters'  theses  in 
preparation  in  American  universities  and  colleges  is  the  compilation  of 
the  returns  from  letters  sent  by  the  editors  of  the  Journal  to  departments 
of  sociology.  The  dates  given  indicate  the  probable  year  in  which  the 
degree  will  be  conferred.  The  name  of  the  college  or  university  in  italics 
refers  to  the  institution  where  the  theses  or  dissertations  are  in  progress. 

List  of  Doctoral  Dissertations  in  Progress  in  American 
Universities  and  Colleges 

Gertrude  B.  Austin,  B.S.  Grinnell.     "Leadership  in  the  Woman  Suffrage 

Movement  in  New  York  City. "     1920.     Columbia. 
I.  W.  Ayusawa,  A.B.  Haverford;    A.M.  Columbia.     "International  Labor 

Legislation. "     1920.     Columbia. 
Frank  Clyde  Baker,  A.B.  Oberlin;  B.D.  Yale;  LL.B.  New  York  Law  School; 

LL.M.  New  York  University  Law  School.     "A  Statistical  Study  of  the 

Local  Distribution  of  Voting  on  Constitutional  Amendments  by  the 

Population  of  New  York  City. "     1920.     Columbia. 
Georgia  Baxter,  A.B.  Denver;    A.M.  California.     "A  Statistical  Study  of 

Non-Support  and  Desertion. "     1921.    Bryn  Mawr. 
Herman  H.  Beneke,  A.B.  Miami;  A.M.  Chicago.     "The  Concept  of  Graft." 

1920.  Chicago. 

William  Arthur  Berridge,  A.B.  Harvard;    A.M.  Harvard.     "The  Risk  of 

Unemployment."     1921.    Harvard. 
Martin  Hayes  Bickham,  A.B.  Pennsylvania;    A.M.  Chicago.     "The  Social 

Evolution  of  Democracy. "     1921.     Chicago. 
Walter  Blaine  Bodenhafer,  A.B.  Indiana;    LL.B.  Indiana;    A.M.  Kansas. 

"R61e  of   Group   Concept   in   Ward  and   Modem   Sociology."     1920. 

Chicago. 
Emerson   O.   Bradshaw,   Ph.B.    Chicago;    M.A.    Chicago.     "Social   Forces 

Affecting  the  Life  of  the  Industrial  Community."  1920.  Chicago. 
Bamett  Robert  Brickner,  B.S.  Columbia;    A.M.  Colimibia.     "Community 

Organization  of  the  Jews  in  Cincinnati."     1921.     Cincinnati. 
Thomas  I.  Brown,  A.B.  Clark  College;   M.A.  Clark  University.     "American 

Business  Mores  during  the  Last  Quarter  of  the  Nineteenth  Century." 

1 92 1.  Clark. 

96 


STUDENTS'  DISSERTATIONS  IN  SOCIOLOGY  97 

Agnes  Mary  Hadden  Brynes,  A.B.  Northwestern;  A.M.  Columbia.  "Indus- 
trial Home  Work  in  Pennsylvania. "     1920.    Bryn  Maivr. 

Ginevra  Capocelli,  A.B.  Naples;  A.M.  Columbia.  "The  Influence  of  the 
War  on  Italy. "     1920.     Columbia. 

Niles  Carpenter,  A.B.  Northwestern;  M.A.  Northwestern.  "Guild  Social- 
ism. "     1920.    Harvard. 

Archibald  B.  Clark,  A.B.  Reed.  "The  Popular  Vote  as  an  Index  of  Soli- 
darity."    1921.     Columbia. 

Bertha  W.  Clark,  A.B.  George  Washington;  A.M.  Colimibia.  "Attitude  of 
Foreigners  in  America  toward  Our  Educational  System."  1922.  Min- 
nesota. 

Mary  O.  Cowper,  A.B.  Drury;  A.M.  Kansas.  "The  History  of  Woman 
Suffrage  in  Kansas. "     192 1.     Chicago. 

Frieda  Opal  Daniel,  A.B.  Drake.  "A  Social  Survey  of  an  Industrial  Area, 
Chicago."     1921.     Chicago. 

Stanley  P.  Davies,  A.B.  Bucknell.  "Racial  Assimilation  in  a  Commimity  in 
the  Anthracite  Coal  Region."     1921.     Columbia. 

Jerome  Davis,  A.M.  Columbia.  "Russians  in  the  United  States. "  1921. 
Columbia. 

Jerome  B.  Davis,  A.B.  Oberlin.  "The  Russian  Slav  in  America."  1921. 
Wisconsin. 

C.  A.  Dawson,  A.B.  Aciadia.  "The  Social  Nature  of  Thinking."  1922. 
Chicago. 

Frederick  G.  Detwiler,  B.D.  Rochester  Theological  Seminary;  A.B.,  A.M. 
Denison.  "A  Study  of  the  Negro  Press  in  the  United  States."  1921. 
Chicago. 

Julius  Drachsler,  B.S.  City  College  of  New  York;  A.M.  Columbia.  "Eth- 
nogamy  in  New  York  City :  A  Study  of  Amalgamation  of  Foreign  Nation- 
alties. "     1920.     Columbia. 

Z.  T.  Egardner,  A.B.  Basel;  A.M.  Cincinnati.  "Problems  of  Socialization, 
Democratization,    and    Americanization    in    an    Urban    Community." 

1920.  Chicago. 

Frieda  Fligelman,  A.B.  Wisconsin.  "The  Principle  of  Participation — ^A 
Critique  of  '  Les  Fonctiones  Mentales  dans  les  Societes  Inferieures.'  " 

192 1.  Columbia. 

W.  E.  Garnett,  A.B.  Cornell;  A.M.  Peabody.     "Social  Survey  of  Albermarle 

County,  Virginia."     1920.     Wisconsin. 
Jacob  A.  Goldberg,  A.B.  City  College  of  New  York.     "Social  Treatment  of 

the  Insane. "     1920.     Columbia. 
George  E.  Hartmann,  A.B.  Cincinnati.     "Race  Consciousness:   A  Function 

of  Race  Prejudice,  with  Particular  Reference  to  the  American  Negro." 

1920.     Chicago. 
H.   B.    Hawthorne,   A.B.   Iowa   Agricvdtural   College.     "The   Comparative 

Efficiency  of  Rural  Communities. "     1921.     Wisconsin. 


98  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

Joyce  0.  Hertzler,  A.B.  Baldwin-Wallace;  A.M.  Wisconsin.  "Social  Utopias 
and  Utopianism. "     1920.     Wiscoyisin. 

Roy  Hinman  Holmes,  A.B.  Hillsdale;  A.M.  Michigan.  "The  Farm  in 
Democracy."     1920.     Michigan. 

Jakub  Horak,  Ph.B.  Chicago.  "A  Study  of  Czecho-Slovak  Community 
Organization  in  Chicago. "     1920.     Chicago. 

Gwendolyn  Hughes,  A.B.  Nebraska;  A.M.  Nebraska.  "Mothers  in  Industry; 
a  Study  in  Causation. "     1920.    Bryn  Mawr. 

Uichi  Iwasaki,  LL.B.  Kansas;  A.M.  Columbia.  "Phases  of  Social  Organi- 
zation in  Japan,  191 1-1919."     1920.     Columbia. 

C.  C.  Jansen,  A.B.  Taylor;  A.M.  Kansas.  "The  Americanization  of  German- 
Russian  Mennonites  in  Central  Kansas. "     192 1.     Chicago. 

Glenn  R.  Johnson,  A.B.  Reed.  "The  American  Newspaper  as  an  Indicator 
of  Social  Forces. "     1920.     Columbia. 

Frederick  Jones,  B.S.  Virginia  Polytechnic  Institute;  A.B.  Richmond;  A.M. 
Columbia.     "  Measure  of  Forms  of  Political  Progress. "     1921.     Columbia. 

S.  C.  Kincheloe,  A.B.  Drake;  A.M.  Chicago.  "The  Psychology  of  Leader- 
ship."    1922.     Chicago. 

Ada  Ruth  Kuhn,  A.B.  Nebraska;  A.M.  Nebraska.  "Mothers  in  Industry; 
a  Study  in  Effect. "     1921.    Bryn  Mawr. 

Dan  H.  Kulp,  A.B. ,  A.M.  Brown.     "The  Chinese  Family."     1921.     Chicago. 

C.  S.  Laidman,  A.B.  Manitoba.  "A  Study  of  the  Institutional  Church  in 
Chicago."     1920.     Chicago. 

Charles  E.  Lively,  A.B.  Nebraska;  A.M.  Nebraska.  "The  Social  Life  of  the 
Rural  Community  in  Its  Relation  to  Types  of  Agriculture."  1922. 
Minnesota. 

Roderick  D.  McKenzie,  A.B.  Manitoba;  A.M.  Chicago.  "The  Social  Study 
of  the  Neighborhood. "     1920.     Chicago. 

Benjamin  Malzberg,  B.S.  City  College  of  New  York.  "Causes  of  Crime." 
192 1.     Columbia. 

May  Baker  Marsh,  A.B.,  A.M.  Michigan.  "Folkways  in  Art."  1921. 
Columbia. 

Anne  Harold  Martin,  Ph.B.  Chicago.    "The  Conflict  Myth. "     1922.    Chicago. 

Bruce  Lee  Melvin,  A.B.  Missouri;  A.M.  Missouri.  "The  Social  Structure 
and  Function  of  the  American  Village. "     1920.    Missouri. 

Richard  Stockton  Meriam,  A.B.  Harvard.  "Development  of  Trade  Union- 
ism in  Imperial  Germany. "     1921.    Harvard. 

Else  Milner  Michod,  A.B.  Chicago;  M.A.  Chicago.  "The  Woman  Offender. ' ' 
192 1.     Chicago. 

Ralph  W.  Nelson,  A.B.  PhiUips;  A.M.  Kansas;  B.D.  Yale.  "Elements  of 
the  Social  Theory  of  Jesus."     1921.     Chicago. 

Clemens  Niemi,  A.B.  Minnesota;  A.M.  Chicago.  "The  Finnish  Element  in 
the  American  Population . "     1 9  2 1 .     Chicago . 


STUDENTS'  DISSERTATIONS  IN  SOCIOLOGY  99 

Hazel  Grant  Ormsbee,  A.B.  Cornell.  "The  Juvenile  Labor  Exchange  in 
the  United  States  and  England,  with  a  Statistical  Analysis  of  Records 
in  the  Philadelphia  Bureau  of  Compulsory  Education."  1921.  Bryn 
Mawr. 

Maurice  Thomas  Price,  A.B.  Chicago.  "The  Technique  of  Religious  Propa- 
ganda."    1921.     Chicago. 

Samuel  Henry  Prince,  A.B.,  A.M.  Toronto.  "  Catastrophe  and  Social  Organi- 
zation."     1920.     Columbia. 

Clarence  E.  Rainwater,  A.B.,  A.M.  Drake.     "The  Neighborhood  Center." 

1 92 1.  Chicago. 

S.  C.  Ratcliflfe,  A.B.  Mount  Allison;  A.M.  Alberta.  "The  Historical  Develop- 
ment of  Poor  Relief  Legislation  in  Illinois. "     1921.     Chicago. 

Ellery  F.  Reed,  A.B.  Lenox;  A.M.  Clark.  "Causes  and  Control  of  Radical- 
ism."    1921.     Illinois. 

Frank  Alexander  Ross,  Ph.B.  Yale;  A.M.  Columbia.  "A  Study  of  the 
Application  of  Statistical  Methods  to  Sociological  Problems."  1920. 
Columbia. 

G.  S.  H.  Rossouw,  A.B.  Cape  of  Good  Hope;  A.M.  Chicago.  "NationaUsm 
and  Folk  Language. "     1921.     Chicago. 

Herbert  Newhard  Shenton,  A.B.  Dickinson;  A.M.  Columbia;  B.D.  Drew. 
"  Collective  Decision. "     1920.     Columbia. 

Ernest  Hugh  Shideler,  A.B.  Ottawa;    M.A.  Chicago.     "Social  Heredity." 

1922.  Chicago. 

Russell  Gordon  Smith,  A.B.  Richmond;    A.M.  Columbia.     "A  Sociological 

Study  of  Opinion  in  the  United  States."     192 1.     Columbia. 
William  C.  Smith,  A.B.  Grand  Island;  A.M.  Chicago.     "Conflict  and  Fusion 

of  Cultures  as  Typified  by  the  Ao  Nagas  of  Northeast  India."     1920. 

Chicago. 
Donald  R.  Taft,  A.B.  Clark.     "The  Role  of  Sympathy  in  Labor  Organi- 
zations."    1921.     Columbia. 
J.  Franklin  Thomas,  A.B.  Beloit.     "Theories  concerning  the  Influence  of 

Physical  Environment  upon  Society. "     1920.     Columbia. 
Donna  Fay  Thompson,  A.B.,  A.M.  Indiana.     "The  Birth-Rate  in  College 

Graduates'  Families."     1921.     Columbia. 
Frederic  M.  Thrasher,  A.B.  De  Pauw;    A.M.  Chicago.     "The  Boy  Scout 

Movement  as  a  Socializing  Agency. "     1920.     Chicago. 
Sumis  Uesugi,  A.M.  Chicago.     "The  Family  in  Japan."     1921.     Chicago. 
Amey  Eaton  Watson  (Mrs.  Frank  D.),  A.B.  Women's  College,  Brown;  A.M. 

Pennsylvania.     "Social    Treatment    of    Illegitimate    Mothers."     1921. 

Bryn  Mawr. 
Comer  M.  Woodward,  A.B.  Emory;   A.M.,  D.B.  Chicago.     "A  Case  Study 

of  Successful  Rural  Churches. "     1921.     Chicago. 
Thomas  Jackson  Woofter,  A.B.  Georgia.     "Rural  Organization  and  Negro 

Migration."     1920.     Columbia. 


lOO  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

Fred  Roy  Yoder,  A.B.  Lenoir;  A.M.  North  Carolina.    "The  Social  Aspects 

of  Farm  Tenancy. "     1920.     Missouri. 
Oscar  B.  Ytrehus,  A.B.  North  Dakota.     "A  Study  of  the  Scandinavian 

American  Press."     1921.     Chicago. 
Tinn  Hugh  Yu,  A.B.  Maine;    M.A.  Clark.     "Social  Evolution  and  Social 

Control  in  China. "     1920.     Clark. 
A.  C.Zumbrunnen,  A.B.  Central;  A.M.Missouri.     "  The  Community  Church : 

A  New  Expression  of  the  Movement  for  Denominational  Unity. "     1920. 

Chicago. 

List  of  Masters'  Dissertations  in  Progress  in  American 
Universities  and  Colleges 

Ruth  Babcock,  B.S.  New  York  Teachers  College.     "A  Study  of  a  Public 

School  as  a  Social  Force  in  an  Italian  Neighborhood. "     1920.     Columbia. 
Gladys  Norton  Beaumont,  A.B.   Nebraska.     "Administration  of  Juvenile 

Court  Law  in  Nebraska. "     1920.     Nebraska. 
Myrtle  Disie  Berry,  A.B.  Nebraska.     "Effect  of  War  on  Legislation  Relating 

to  Foreigners. "     1921.     Nebraska. 
David  A.  Bridge,  A.B.  Southern  California.    "Recreation  Center  District  of 

Los  Angeles. "     1920.     Southern  California. 
Ralph  F.  Burnight,  A.B.  Southern  California.     "The  Japanese  Problem  in 

Rural  Los  Angeles  County."     1920.     Southern  California. 
Anna  Marghuerite  Cameron,  A.B.  Nebraska.     "Borderlinity:    A  Study  of 

200  Cases  of  Retardation  in  Lincoln  Public  Schools. "     1920.     Nebraska. 
Spenser  W.  Castle,  A.B.  Beloit.     "A  Newspaper  Phase  of  Sociology."     1920. 

Chicago. 
Grace  Challman,  A.B.  Minnesota.     "The  Use  of  Leisure  Time  by  the  Italians 

of  New  York  City. "     1920.     Columbia. 
Seward  Cheung  Chan,  Ph.B.  Chicago.     "Religious  Education  in  the  Home." 

1920.     Chicago. 
Winifred    Chappell,    Ph.B.    Northwestern.     "Industrial    Missions."     1920. 

Columbia. 
Ernest  John  Chave,  A.B.,  Th.B.  McMaster.     "Religious  Education  and  the 

Development  of  Social  Attitudes. "     1920.     Chicago. 
Ta  Chen,  A.B.  Reed.     "Practical  Eugenics  in  the  United  States:    Birth 

Control. "     1920.     Columbia. 
Albert  B.  Clarfield,  B.S.  Kiev;  LL.B.  New  York  University.     "The  Ameri- 
canization of  the  Foreign  Born  in  a  Typical  American  Community." 

1920.     Minnesota. 
Eleanor  Coit,  A.B.  Smith.     "Some  Primary  Social  Effects  of  the  Organization 

of  Women  in  Industry. "     1920.     Columbia. 
Marjorie  H.  Coonley,  Ph.B.  Chicago.     "The  History  of  the  United  Charities 

of  Chicago. "     1920.     Chicago. 


STUDENTS'  DISSERTATIONS  IN  SOCIOLOGY  loi 

Herbert  Cumming  Comuelle,  A.B.  Cincinnati.     "A  Critical  Examination  of 

the  Social  Teachings  of  Jesus. "     1920.     Cincinnati. 
Mearl  P.  Culver,  A.B.  Albion.     "A  Sociological  Survey  of  a  Long  Island 

Town."     1920.     Columbia. 
Peter  Marshall  Curry,  A.B.  Baylor.     "Woman  As  Fundamentally  Related  to 

Social  Progress. "     1920.    Brown. 
Hazel  Jane  Darby,  A.B.  Ohio  State.     "Labor  Turnover  in  Department  Stores 

in  Columbus."     1921.    Ohio  State. 
Henderson  Hamilton  Donald,  A.B.  Howard.     "An  Interpretation  of  Negro 

Migration  in  1916-18. "     1920.     Yale. 
Elizabeth  Downing,  A.B.  Trinity.     "After-Care  Methods  in  Dealing  with 

Children  in  Catholic  Institutions. "     1920.     Columbia. 
Edwin  F.  Dummeier,  A.B.  Louisiana  State  University.     "Financing  Public 

Education  in  Colorado. "     1921.     Colorado. 
M.  Eutropia  Flannery,  A.B.  Marquette.     "Biblical  Influence  on  Modern 

Novels."     1920.    Loyola. 
Arabel  F.  Forbes,  B.S.  New  York  Teachers  College.     "The  Labor  Problem 

of  Ulster  County  of  New  York  State. "     1920.     Columbia. 
Katherine  A.   Fox,   B.E.  Wisconsin.     "Democracy  in   Merchant   Gilds  of 

Middle  Ages."     1921.    Loyola. 
Edward    Frazier,    A.B.    Clark.      "New   Currents  of  Thought  among  Our 

Negro  Population."     1920.     Clark. 
A.  A.  Frederick,  A.B.  Beloit.     "A  Study  of  the  Personality  of  the  Workman 

in  Machine  Industry. "     1920.     Chicago. 
Daniel  C.  Fu,  A.B.  William  Jewell.     "The  Chinese  Family."     1920.     Chicago. 
Mary  B.  Garvin,  A.B.  Illinois.     "Fifty  Years  of  Progress  toward  Church 

Unity  in  the  United  States. "     1920.    Illinois. 
Dorothy  Gary,  A.B.  Westhampton.     "Headlines  of  Some  New  York  Papers 

as  Social  Stimuli. "     1920.     Columbia. 
Julia  Gethman,  A.B.  Northwestern.     "The  Settlement — A  Factor  in  Ameri- 
canization."     1920.     Columbia. 
Columb  Gilfillan,  A.B.  Pennsylvania.     "Successful  Social  Prophecy  in  the 

Past."     1920.     Columbia. 
Sophia    Gleim,    A.B.   Ohio    Northern.      "The    Visiting    Teacher."     1921. 

Chicago. 
Charles  Guy  Gomon,  A.B.  Nebraska  Wesleyan.     "The  Saloon:   A  Study  in 

Social  Causation. "     1920.     Nebraska. 
Alonzo   G.    Grace,   A.B.    Minnesota.     "Problems   in   Amalgamization   and 

Assimilization. "     1920.     Minnesota. 
Clementina  Griffin,  A.B.  Vassar.     "Poverty  among  the  Mexicans  in  Los 

Angeles. "     1920.     Southern  California. 
Royal   G.   Hall,  A.B.   Park;    B.D.   Auburn   Theological   Seminary.     "The 

Religious  Implications  of  Democracy. "     1920.    Kansas. 


I02  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

Olive  Hardwick,  A.B.  Agnes  Scott.     "The  American  Newspaper  as  a  Social 

Force."     1920.     Columbia. 
Ralph  Harshman,  A.B.  Ohio  Northern.    "Racial  Contacts  in  Columbus." 

1920.     Ohio  State. 
James  Noble  Holsen,  A.B.  Butler.     "The  Public  Lands,  1860-1900."     1920. 

Indiana. 
Frank  C.  Irwin,  A.B.  Saskatchewan.     "Canadian  Industrial  Disputes  Act." 

1920.     Columbia. 
Helen  Rankin  Jeter,  A.B.  California.    "A  Summary  of  Juvenile  Court  Legis- 
lation in  the  United  States. "     1920.     Chicago. 
Ernest  Jones,  A.B.  Missouri.     "Survey  of  the  Rural  Churches  of  Randolph 

County,  Missouri. "     1920.    Missouri. 
Fay  B.  Karpf,  B.S.  Northwestern.     "  History  and  Development  of  Jewish 

Philanthropy  in  Chicago."     1921.     Chicago. 
Frances  M.  Kilpatrick,  A.B.  Northwestern.     "A  Sociological  Study  of  Femi- 
nism. "     1920.    Chicago. 
Ellis  L.  Kirkpatrick.  B.S.  Iowa  State  Agricultural.     "Social  Life  of  the  'Bre- 

them':  A  Study  of  the  English  River  Community,  Iowa. "    1920.    Kansas. 
Olive  P.  Kirschner,  A.B.  Boston.     "The  Italians  in  Los  Angeles."     1920. 

Southern  California. 
E.  T.  Krueger,  A.B.  Illinois;    B.D.  Chicago  Theological  Seminary.     "The 

Problem  of  the  Function  of  the  College."     1921.     Chicago. 
Shiko  Kusama,  Ph.B.  Chicago.     "Public  Opinion  and  the  Japanese  Press  in 

the  United  States. "     1920.     Chicago. 
Charles  M.  Larcomb,  A.B.  Ohio  Wesleyan.     "Survey  of  Free  Placement  in 

Chicago."     1920.     Chicago. 
Henrietta  Larson,  A.B.  St.  Olaf.    "The  Social  Significance  of  the  Non-Partisan 

League."     1920.     Columbia. 
O.  R.  Lavers,  A.B.  Queens.     "The  Social  Significance  of  Housing."     1920. 

Chicago. 
Amy  Jane  Leazenby,  B.S.  Missouri.     "Day  Nurseries  as  an  Agency  in  Child 

Care. "     1920.     Chicago. 
Celeste  Leger,  A.B.  Chicago.     "Bibliography  of  Catholic  Periodicals. "     1920. 

Loyola. 
Cynthia  B.  Lewis,  B.S.  New  York  Teachers  College.     "The  Society  of  Friends 

in  the  War.    A  Sociological  Study. "     1920.     Columbia. 
Chi  Li,  A.B.  Clark  College.     "The  Problem  of  Individual  Differences. "     1920. 

Clark. 
Elsie  McCartney,  A.B.  Trinity.     "The  Development  of  the  Juvenile  Court 

Movement."     1920.     Columbia. 
Emma  C.  Martin,  A.B.  Butler.     "A  Study  of  Leadership.    Woman  in  the 

Professions."     1920.     Columbia. 
Harold  Shepard  Matthews,  A.B.  Grinnell.     "The  Influence  of  the  Missionary 

on  the  Social  Conditions  of  China."     1920.     Chicago. 


STUDENTS'  DISSERTATIONS  IN  SOCIOLOGY  103 

Ernest  Meili,  A.B.  Central  Wesleyan.     "The  Standard  of  Living  of  the  Coal 

Miners  of  Columbia,  Missouri."     1920.     Missouri. 
Olga  M.  Meloy,  A.B.   Dickinson.     "A  Recreation  Survey  of  Harrisburg, 

Pennsylvania."     1920.    Chicago. 
Frankie  Merson,  A.B.  Bates.     "Recent  Tendencies  in  the  Labor  Movement 

in  England  and  America. "     1920.     Columbia. 
Montagu  F.  Modder,A.B.  Royal;  B.H.  Springfield.    "Caste  System  in  India." 

1920.     Clark. 
John  Alexander  Morrison,  B.S.  Lewis  Institute.     "A  History  of  the  Salvation 

Army  from  1880  to  the  Present."     1920.     Chicago. 
Marguerite  Munroe,  A.B.   Southern  California.     "Caring  for  Orphans  in 

Los  Angeles  County."-    1920.    Southern  California. 
Elizabeth  Carle  Nelson,  A.B.  Texas.     "Economic  Organization  of  the  Eskimo 

and  Chukchee. "     1920.     Texas. 
Marian  Neuls,  A.B.  Southern  California.     "Home  Service  in  Los  Angeles." 

1920.     Southern  California. 
Grace  Pabst,  A.B.  Hunter.     "The  History  and  Present  Status  of  the  Eugenics 

Movement."     1920.     Columbia. 
Warren  Pearson,  A.B.  Kansas.     "The  Problem  of  Leisure  Time."     1920. 

Kansas. 
Lillian  Pierce,  A.B.  Southern  California.     "The  Negro  in  Watts,  California." 

1920.  Southern  California. 

Carl  Terence  Pihlblad,  A.B.  Bethany.  "The  Language  Assimilation  of  a 
Swedish  Community  in  the  Middle  West. "     1920.    Missouri. 

Lorine  L.  Pruette,  B.S.  Chattanooga.  "Sumner  and  Durkheim;  a  Compara- 
tive Study. "     1920.     Clark. 

Edward  G.  Punke,  B.S.  Hastings.  "The  Guild  Socialist  Movement."  1920. 
Missouri. 

Norman  J.  Radder,  A.B.  Wisconsin.  "A  Study  of  the  News  Value  of  Feature 
Articles  in  Newspapers. "     192 1.    Minnesota. 

Harry  Henry  Reimund,  A.B.  Nebraska.  "Enforcement  of  School  Attendance 
Law  in  Nebraska. "     1921.    Nebraska. 

Lendell  C.  Ridley,  A.B.,  B.D.  Wilberforce.  "Housing  Conditions  among 
Colored  People  in  Columbus. "     1920.    Ohio  State. 

Myra  Rieve,  B.S.  Loyola.     "  Preventive  Work  in  Religious  Orders  of  Women. " 

1921.  Loyola. 

Kenoske  Sato,  A.B.  Illinois.     "A  Study  in  Social  Valuation  Process."     1920. 

Chicago. 
Helen  I.  Schermerhorn,  A.B.  Vassar.     "Some  Observations  of  Social  Behavior 

in  Children  of  the  Intermediate  Grades. "     1920.     Columbia. 
Wilford  HaU  Scott,  A.B.  Ctxlver-Stockton;   D.B.  Bible  CoUege  of  Missouri. 

"The    Significance   for   Missions   of   Hindu   Social   Attitudes."     1920. 

Chicago. 


I04  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

Earl  Truman  Sechler,  A.B.  Drury  College;  S.B.  Springfield  Normal.  "The 
Attitude  of  the  Prophets  toward  Wealth."     1920.     Chicago. 

Clifford  R.  Shaw,  A.B.  Adrian.  "Family  Disintegration  as  a  Contributing 
Factor  in  Juvenile  Delinquency. "     1920.     Chicago. 

John  Herman  Shields,  A.B.  Texas.  "Corporation  Taxes  in  Texas."  1920. 
Texas. 

Aileen  Smith,  A.B.  Southern  Methodist.  "Social  Organization  in  a  Club  of 
Young  Working  Girls. "     1920.     Columbia. 

Francis  M.  Smith,  A.B.  Southern  California.  "Social  Conditions  in  Tropico, 
California. "     1920.     Southern  California. 

Gilbert  H.  Smith,  A.B.  Trinity.  "Denominational  Activities  at  the  State 
Universities."     1920.     Chicago. 

Louise  M.  Spaeth,  A.B.  Texas.  "  An  Analysis  of  Trade  Unionism  from  the 
Standpoint  of  Social  Control."     1920.     Chicago. 

Earl  Sylvester  Sparks,  A.B.  Texas.  "A  Survey  of  Organized  Labor  in  Austin, 
Texas."     1920.     Texas. 

Gladys  F.  Speaker,  A.B.  Minnesota.  "An  Americanization  Teaching  Pro- 
gram."    1920.    Minnesota. 

Virginia  Wendell  Spence,  A.B.  Texas.  "The  Awards  of  the  National  War 
Labor  Board."     1920.     Texas. 

Ellis  L.  Starrett,  A.B.  Kansas.  "A  Survey  of  National  Volvmtary  Social 
Welfare  Organizations  in  the  United  States."     1920.     Kansas. 

KatherineTighe,  A.B.  Vassar.     "The  Unplaceable  Child. "    1920.    Minnesota. 

Arthur  Van  Dervort,  A.B.  Hiram.  "Was  Sumner  Fatalistic?"  1920. 
Columbia. 

Thomas  F.  Walsh,  A.B.  St.  Joseph's.  "A  Study  of  the  Increased  Wages  and 
of  the  Increased  Leisure  of  the  Working  Class  in  a  Catholic  Parish  in 
Upper  Manhattan. "     1920.     Columbia. 

Frank  Bird  Ward,  Ph.B.  Denison.  "An  Interpretation  of  the  Chartist  Move- 
ment."     1920.    Cincinnati. 

Frank  Dale  Warren,  A.B.  Princeton.  "Causes  of  Migration."  1920.  Co- 
lumbia. 

Mabel  Ranney  Wheeler,  A.B.  Kansas.  "The  Germanic  Element  in  Kansas: 
Its  Significance  to  the  State. "     1920.    Kansas. 

Elizabeth  K.  Wilson,  A.B.  Kansas.  "The  Development  and  Value  of  the 
Psychopathic  Laboratory  in  the  Courts  of  the  United  States."  1920. 
Kansas. 

Cass  Ward  Whitney,  B.S.  Cornell.     " Rural  Recreation. "     Bt)2o.     Chicago. 

Forest  Emerson  Witcraft,  A.B.  Chicago.  "The  Elements  of  the  Mana  Con- 
cept."    1920.     Chicago. 

Wilbert  L.  Witte,  A.B.  Northwestern  CoUege.  "The  County  Y.M.C.A.: 
Its    Development,    Organization,    and    Program."     1920.     Minnesota. 

Erie  Fiske  Young,  Ph.B.  Chicago.  "The  Use  of  Case  Method  in  Training 
Social  Workers. "     1920.     Chicago. 


NEWS  AND  NOTES 


Notes  of  interest  to  the  readers  of  the  Journal  should  be  in  the  hands  of  the 
editor  of  "News  and  Notes"  not  later  than  the  tenth  of  the  month  preceding 
publication.  

National  Conference  of  Social  Work 

The  National  Conference  of  Social  Work  held  April  14-21  in  New 
Orleans  was  both  a  revelation  of  the  progress  of  social  work  in  the 
South  and  an  impetus  to  its  growth  in  the  future.  A  further  indication 
of  the  fundamental  nature  of  this  social  interest  is  the  opening  and  expan- 
sion of  departments  of  sociology  in  several  universities  and  colleges  in 
southern  states.  A  feature  of  the  conference  was  the  increased  interest 
in  training  for  social  work.  One  session  of  the  Division  on  Organizing 
of  Social  Forces  was  devoted  to  this  subject.  Professor  R.  J.  Colbert, 
at  present  educational  director  of  the  Gulf  Division,  American  Red 
Cross,  spoke  on  "Training  and  Action  in  Social  Work,"  and  Porter 
R.  Lee,  director  of  the  New  York  School  of  Social  Work,  gave  a  paper 
on  "Providing  Teaching  Material."  The  Association  of  Training 
Schools  of  Social  Work  also  held  an  open  session  on  the  relation  of 
field  work  to  the  training  of  social  workers. 

Among  the  sociologists  present  at  the  conference,  the  following 
read  papers:  Professor  Lee  Bidgood,  University  of  Alabama,  "The 
Place  of  the  Juvenile  Court  in  the  Care  of  Dependent  Children"; 
Professor  A.  J.  Todd,  University  of  Minnesota,  "The  Responsibility 
of  Social  Workers  as  the  Interpreters  of  Industrial  Problems"  and 
"Desired  Minimum  of  Sociological  Insight  for  Workers  with  Delin- 
quents"; Professor  Alfred  Arvold,  University  of  North  Dakota, 
"Citizenship  through  Dramatic  and  Art  Interests";  Professor  E.  C. 
Lindeman,  North  Carolina  College  for  Women,  "The  Organization  and 
Maintenance  of  Recreation  in  Rural  Communities";  Professor  Frederick 
Seidenburg,  Loyola  University,  "Federations  of  Catholic  Charities"; 
Professor  Robert  E.  Park,  University  of  Chicago,  "  The  Foreign  Language 
Press  and  Social  Progress." 


The  Southern  Sociological  Congress 
The   Southern   Sociological   Congress  held  its  ninth   annual   con- 
vention  in   Washington,   D.C.,    May   9-13.     The   president.    Bishop 

105 


io6  TBE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

Theodore  Bratton  of  Mississippi,  presided.  Among  those  who  made 
addresses  were:  Dr.  Shailer  Mathews,  of  the  University  of  Chicago; 
Professor  Charles  A.  Ellwood,  of  the  University  of  Missouri;  Dr. 
Edward  T.  Devine,  of  New  York  City;  Professor  Irving  Fisher,  of  Yale 
University;  Dr.  Samuel  Zane  Batten,  of  Philadelphia;  Dr.  R.  R. 
Moton,  president  of  Tuskegee  Institute;  Mr.  George  W.  Coleman,  of 
Boston;  Dr.  Livingston  Farrand,  of  the  American  Red  Cross;  Dr. 
H.  W.  Wiley,  Washington,  D.C. ;  Dr.  William  L.  Poteat,  North  Carolina; 
Surgeon-General  Hugh  S.  Gumming,  of  the  Federal  Public  Health 
Service;  Dr.  Worth  M.  Tippy,  of  the  Federal  Council  of  Churches; 
and  Rev.  J.  Fort  Newton,  recently  of  City  Temple  of  London. 

Professor  Ellwood  was  chairman  of  the  Committee  on  Resolutions, 
and  among  the  important  resolutions  adopted  was  one  asking  Congress 
to  establish  a  federal  Department  of  Education  and  Health,  with  a 
cabinet  officer  at  its  head. 


United  States  Department  of  Agriculture 
Dr.  L.  H.  Haney,  formerly  with  the  Federal  Trade  Commission, 
has  been  appointed  specialist  in  economic  research  in  the  Bureau  of 
Markets  of  the  U.S.  Department  of  Agriculture.  He  will  conduct 
costs-of-marketing  studies  relating  to  certain  representative  agricultural 
products.  The  necessity  for  these  studies  is  daily  more  apparent, 
and  Dr.  Haney's  economic  investigations  of  prices  and  price  control 
during  the  period  of  the  war,  as  well  as  his  earlier  studies,  fit  him  pecu- 
liarly for  this  work.  Dr.  Haney's  publications  include  History  of  Eco- 
nomic Thought,  191 1 ;  Business  Organization  and  Combination,  1913; 
Report  on  the  Price  of  Gasoline  in  iQij,  1917;  and  Price  Fixing  in  the 
United  States  during  the  War,  191 9. 


University  of  California 
The  Southern  Branch  of  the  University  of  California  will  be  held 
at  Los  Angeles  from  June  21  to  July  31.  Dr.  A.  B.  Wolfe,  professor  of 
economics  and  sociology  in  the  University  of  Texas,  gives  courses  in 
general  sociology  and  industrial  reconstruction.  John  Collier,  formerly 
director  of  the  New  York  Training  School  for  Community  Work,  in 
connection  with  Mr.  R.  Justin  Miller,  assistant  executive  officer  of  the 
state  Commission  of  Immigration  and  Housing,  offers  courses  in  immi- 
gration and  community  organization.  Professor  Ira  B.  Cross  gives  a 
course  in  contemporary  social  problems. 


NEWS  AND  NOTES  107 

University  of  Chicago 

Under  the  leadership  of  Professor  Robert  E.  Park,  the  Society  for 
Social  Research  of  the  University  of  Chicago  was  organized  during  the 
Winter  Quarter.  According  to  the  constitution  adopted,  "The  pur- 
pose of  the  society  is  to  bring  about  the  co-operation  of  persons 
engaged  in  social  research  and  social  investigation. "  The  main  purpose 
of  the  society,  at  present,  is  to  co-operate  with  and  assist  graduate 
students  in  research  problems  undertaken  after  they  have  left  the 
University.  In  order  to  stimulate  interest  and  promote  efficiency  in 
research  and  investigation  the  society  will  act  as  a  clearing-house  of 
investigation  and  research,  will  collect  bibliographies  and  pamphlet 
literature,  and  formulate  methods.  There  will  be  an  advisory  com- 
mittee to  assist  members  in  research  problems.  This  committee  will 
promote  the  publication  of  standard  works  in  research  and  investigation. 

At  the  last  meeting  of  the  school  year  of  the  Sociology  Club  Professor 
Arthur  J.  Todd  of  the  University  of  Minnesota,  at  present  director  of 
Industrial  Relations,  B.  Kuppenheimer  and  Company,  gave  an  address 
on  the  subject  "The  World- War  and  Social  Progress." 


Dartmouth  College 
Professor  John  M.  Mecklin,  of  the  University  of  Pittsburgh,  has 
accepted  a  chair  in  sociology  in  this  institution.  He  will  be  associated 
with  Professor  E.  B.  Woods,  the  head  of  the  department,  in  expanding 
the  work  in  sociology.  Harcourt  Brace  and  Howe  announce  among 
their  new  books  An  Introduction  to  Social  Ethics;  A  Study  of  the  Social 
Conscience  in  a  Democracy,  by  Professor  Mecklin. 


University  of  Florida 
Professor  Newell  L.  Sims  has  recently  published  The  Rural  Com- 
munity, a  compilation  of  materials  upon  the  various  aspects  of  rural  life. 


Franklin  College 
Mr.  Ernest  H.  Shideler,  of  the  University  of  Chicago,  has  accepted 
the  position  of  associate  professor  and  acting  head  of  the  newly  estab- 
lished department  of  economics  and  sociology.  During  the  past  year 
Professor  Shideler  has  been  engaged  in  working  out  and  teaching  high- 
school  courses  in  social  science  in  the  University  High  School  of  the 
School  of  Education,  University  of  Chicago. 


io8  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

Lawrence  College 
Mr.  Fred  A.  Conrad,  of  the  University  of  Chicago,  who  has  had 
charge  of  the  work  in  sociology  at  the  University  of  Cincinnati  during 
the  spring  quarter,  has  been  appointed  to  the  headship  of  the  depart- 
ment of  sociology. 


University  of  Minnesota 
In  the  June  issue  of  The  Historical  Outlook,  a  journal  for  readers, 
students,  and  teachers  of  history.  Professor  Ross  L.  Finney  has  an  article 
on  the  subject  "  Course  in  General  History  from  the  Sociologists'  Stand- 
point." This  paper  will  be  of  interest  to  sociologists  because  it  is  an 
elaboration  of  the  point  of  view  presented  to  the  American  Sociological 
Society  at  its  last  meeting  by  the  Committee  on  Teaching  of  Sociology 
in  the  Grade  and  High  Schools  of  America,  of  which  Professor  Finney  was 
chairman. 


University  of  Missouri 
Mr.  A.  F.  Kuhlman,  A.B.,  University  of  Chicago,  1916,  now  director 
of  surveys  of  the  Southern  Division  of  the  American  Red  Cross,  Atlanta, 
Georgia,  has  been  elected  to  an  assistant  professorship  in  sociology  at 
the  University  of  Missouri.  Mr.  Kuhlman  will  begin  his  work  at  the 
University  of  Missouri  in  September  and  will  have  charge  of  the  practical 
social  service  courses. 


Simmons  College  School  of  Social  Work 
Announcement  is  made  of  the  retirement  of  Dr.  Jeffrey  R.  Brackett 
after  sixteen  years  of  service  as  director  of  the  School  of  Social  Work 
and  professor  of  social  economy  in  Simmons  College.  Dr.  Brackett 
has  been  made  professor  emeritus.  His  place  will  be  taken  by  Dr. 
Stuart  A.  Queen,  now  associate  professor  of  social  technology  in  Goucher 
College  and  director  of  educational  service  of  the  Potomac  Division  of 
the  American  Red  Cross. 


University  of  Washington 
During  the  summer  quarter  Professor  H.  E.  Woolston  will  give 
courses  in  the  principles  of  sociology  and  also  conduct  a  senior  seminar. 
Professor  R.  D.  McKenzie,  of  the  University  of  West  Virginia,  offers 
courses  in  community  organization  and  in  poverty  and  relief. 


NEWS  AND  NOTES  109 

University  of  West  Virginia 

Dr.  Henry  D.  Hall,  of  Weslyan  College,  Connecticut,  has  been 
appointed  to  give  courses  in  labor  problems  and  rural  sociology  during 
the  summer  term.  Dr.  E.  B.  Reuter,  Goucher  College,  and  Miss 
JuUa  Worthington,  of  Cincinnati,  have  been  chosen  by  the  Educational 
Service  Department,  Potomac  Division,  American  Red  Cross,  to  give 
courses  in  race  problems  and  applied  sociology  for  the  summer  quarter. 


University  of  Wisconsin 

Announcement  has  been  made  by  the  Century  Company  of  a  new 
book  by  Professor  Edward  A.  Ross,  entitled  Principles  of  Sociology. 
The  interest  of  students  of  sociology  in  this  work  has  been  stimulated 
by  several  chapters  from  it  which  have  appeared  in  recent  issues  of  the 
American  Journal  of  Sociology. 


REVIEWS 


The  Principles  oj  Sociology.  By  Edwaed  Alsworth  Ross.  The 
Century  Co.,  1920.     Pp.  xviii+708. 

Without  slightest  abatement  of  respect  for  the  preparatory  work 
that  in  the  generation  now  passing  has  buih  up  a  meritorious  sociological 
literature,  I  must  confess  the  reaction  that  in  this  book  sociology,  as  an 
exhibit  of  results  in  contrast  with  a  discussion  of  methods,  has  at  last 
arrived.  Many  men,  widely  scattered  in  time  and  space,  have  given 
more  or  less  heed  to  the  premonition  that  there  is  a  point  of  view,  if 
it  could  only  be  determined,  from  which  instruction  might  be  derived 
about  essentials  of  human  experience  that  the  traditional  sciences  of 
society  have  overlooked.  Since  1880  the  number  of  men  who  have 
devoted  themselves  to  search  for  this  point  of  view,  and  to  the  develop- 
ment of  a  procedure  appropriate  to  it  as  a  point  of  departure,  has 
increased  at  a  rate  approaching  arithmetical  proportion.  Among  these 
believers  that  the  older  social  sciences  had  not  fully  exploited  the  evi- 
dence, profitable  though  thankless  work  was  added  to  work  year  after 
year  in  locating  a  more  promising  base  of  operations  and  in  elaborating 
a  technique  suited  to  the  enterprise  which  the  clearing  outlook  demanded. 
Incidental  to  this  mostly  methodological  dead-work,  many  scholars  who 
called  themselves  sociologists  succeeded  in  bringing  to  light  important 
facts  and  significant  relationships  of  more  or  less  permanent  and  general 
significance.  These  partial  or  tentative  results,  however,  whether  in  one 
of  the  fields  of  concrete  survey  or  in  fundamentals,  have  accumulated 
at  such  widely  separated  spots  that  only  a  few  specialists  in  social  science 
have  been  able  to  grasp  them  in  the  aggregate,  still  less  in  correlation,  or 
even  to  become  distinctly  aware  of  their  existence. 

Now  comes  a  book,  not  of  methods,  but  of  findings.  It  does  not 
attempt  to  sum  up  all  the  results  of  sociological  analysis.  It  sets  in 
systematic  order  a  large  body  of  perceptions  which  appeal  to  the 
author  as  of  prime  importance.  He  does  not  claim  that  he  has  finished 
the  task  of  interpreting  human  experience.  He  does  claim  that  his 
system  of  analysis  is  a  valid  interpretation  in  itself,  however  much 
more  interpretation  the  facts  may  turn  out  to  bear. 

The  book  appeals  to  me  as  sufiicient  to  convince  all  competent- 
minded  persons  not  previously  convinced  that  there  are  ranges  of  vital 


REVIEWS  III 

human  relationships  which  had  almost  wholly  escaped  the  notice  of  the 
older  tj^pes  of  social  science.  The  life  of  men  turns  out  to  move  in  the 
course  of  incessant  construction  and  destruction,  arrangement  and 
derangement  of  group  situations.  Sophistication  about  life  conse- 
quently begins  with  ability  to  detect  the  phases  of  this  process  which 
are  involved  in  the  particular  situations  with  which  one  is  concerned. 

Accordingly  Professor  Ross  begins  his  eye-opening  program  by 
introducing  the  actors  in  the  human  drama  as  "The  Social  Population," 
to  be  made  intelligible  by  certain  traits  in  their  conditions  and  composi- 
tion. In  Part  II,  under  the  title  "The  Social  Forces,"  the  author 
rapidly  sketches  the  least  exceptional  influences  that  play  within  the 
orbits  of  human  relationships.  Then  follows  the  bulk  of  the  book — 
nearly  five  hundred  pages — on  "  Social  Processes."  Part  IV,  on  "  Social 
Products"  traverses  more  familiar  ground,  and  Part  V,  "Sociological 
Principles,"  is  the  small  fraction  of  the  book  which  may  interest  the 
professional  social  scientist  more  than  the  layman. 

In  Part  III,  "Social  Processes,"  Professor  Ross  introduces  the 
reader  to  some  forty  types  of  reaction  between  people,  any  one  of  which 
may  occur,  after  its  kind,  in  the  course  of  the  most  humdrum  daily 
occupations  no  less  than  in  exceptional  and  dramatic  episodes.  Essen- 
tially the  same  reaction,  with  differing  proportions  and  modes  of  mani- 
festation, may  be  present  in  a  session  of  the  Grand  General  Staff  and 
in  a  Friends'  Yearly  Meeting;  in  the  Council  of  Nicea  and  in  the  San 
Francisco  Convention;  in  Buckingham  Palace  and  in  an  east-side 
tenement.  These  are  the  things  of  which  history  is  composed,  but  which 
the  historians  as  a  rule  have  notoriously  neglected  to  notice.  Professor 
Ross  has  not  exhausted  the  catalogue  of  these  typical  reactions.  On 
the  contrary  it  seems  to  me  that  sociological  analysis  is  likely  to  duplicate 
in  its  way  the  experience  of  astronomical  technique  in  enlarging  our 
conception  of  space.  With  each  improvement  of  our  technique,  new 
vistas  of  human  relationships  uncatalogued  and  unexplored  are  appear- 
ing upon  our  field  of  vision. 

The  book  serves  two  chief  purposes,  and  they  are  as  different  as 
science  and  popularization.  In  the  first  place,  no  one  preparing  to  be 
a  professional  social  scientist,  whatever  his  particular  division  of  labor, 
can  afford  to  be  ignorant  of  it,  or  even  only  superficially  acquainted 
with  it.  Henceforth  the  student  of  social  science  who  has  not  assimilated 
it  is  undertrained.  But  a  danger  signal  is  necessary.  For  anyone  with 
rudimentarily  developed  social  intelligence  the  book  is  such  luring 
reading  that  it  might  easily  seduce  into  the  illusion  that  by  reading  it 


112  TEE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

one  makes  one's  self  a  sociologist.  Eating  a  good  dinner  would  be  a 
co-ordinate  claim  to  competence  as  a  cook.  Let  no  one  flatter  himself 
that  one  can  do  equally  original  and  demonstrative  sociological  thinking 
of  one's  own  without  the  tedious  discipline  which  supplies  the  technique 
and  forms  the  judgment. 

On  the  other  hand  the  book  should  be  a  great  popular  educator. 
Any  high-school  graduate  with  a  mind  for  social  relations,  or  anyone 
qualified  to  take  a  respectable  part  in  trade-union  discussions  should 
find  it  gripping.  It  is  essentially  not  a  book  for  specialists  but  for 
everyone  who  is  trying  intelligently  to  find  himself  in  the  adventure  of 
the  common  lot. 

If  the  number  of  the  Journal  for  which  this  notice  is  scheduled 
were  not  already  overdue,  I  should  probably  yield  to  the  temptation 
to  accept  some  of  the  implicit  challenges  in  the  book  to  methodological 
discussion.  While,  as  already  implied.  Professor  Ross  has  kept  tech- 
nique \vell  out  of  sight  of  the  layman,  the  technologist  will  discover  it, 
and  the  book  is  hardly  likely  to  have  a  higher  ratio  of  value  for  the 
non-professional  public  than  it  will  have  in  provoking  debate  about 
method. 

At  present  a  single  instance  must  suffice.  The  first  sentence  of  the 
book  speaks  truth,  viz.,  "The  traits  and  tendencies  of  society  are  in  no 
small  degree  determined  by  its  human  composition."  It  is  equally 
true,  however,  that  the  traits  and  tendencies  of  human  composition  are 
in  no  small  degree  determined  by  society.  To  the  layman  in  general  and 
to  most  sociologists  there  is  little  or  no  choice  between  taking  one's 
departure  from  the  one  of  these  propositions  or  from  the  other.  To  the 
suspicious  critic  of  method  the  preference  which  Professor  Ross  shows 
indicates  that,  while  he  has  been  doing  more  than  one  man's  share 
toward  making  the  new  procedure  which  we  call  by  some  variant  of 
the  name  group  psychology,  that  new  procedure  has  not  shifted  his  view- 
point as  far  as  might  be  expected  from  the  more  conventional  individual- 
istic outlook.  From  beginning  to  end  of  the  book  Professor  Ross  is 
talking  about  things  that  are  of,  for,  and  by  groups,  but  I  realized  with 
something  like  a  shock  that  he  does  not  begin  to  take  groups  as  the 
direct  subject  of  discourse  until  the  forty-eighth  chapter  (p.  575). 

In  the  present  volume  then  Professor  Ross  is  consistent  with  the 
judgment  which  he  published  fifteen  years  ago,  that  the  group  is  not 
the  true  unit  of  investigation  in  sociology,  but  that  the  primordial  fact 
is  the  social  process  {Foundations  of  Sociology,  pp.  87-91).  There  is  no 
doubt  in  my  mind  that  social  science  as  a  whole  would  be  abortive  if 


REVIEWS  113 

it  were  not  served  by  techniques  which  begin  their  operations  with 
phases  of  reality  either  genetically  or  logically  antecedent  to  the  human 
group.  To  my  mind,  however,  the  category  "social  process"  is  mean- 
ingless except  as  the  group  in  ^notion.  I  cannot  think  of  the  group  in 
motion  without  presupposing  the  group  which  is  the  subject  of  the 
motion.  Accordingly,  if  I  were  composing  a  treatise  on  sociology  today, 
my  first  sentence  would  be.  In  the  beginning  is  the  group.  By  "begin- 
ning" I  should  mean  not  the  beginning  of  things,  but  the  beginning  of 
the  strictly  sociological  aspect  of  things. 

Such  considerations  as  these,  however,  are  specialists'  stufiE,  and 
Professor  Ross's  book  is  something  bigger  than  specialists'  grist.  It  is 
a  luminous  revelation  of  realities  of  the  common  life.  Sociologists  may 
well  be  peculiarly  proud  of  it,  but  it  belongs  in  the  larger  literature 
which  enlists  all  life  and  all  the  sciences  of  life  to  interpret  life. 

Albion  W.  Small 
University  of  Chicago 


Bolshevik  Russia.  By  Etienne  Antonelli.  Translated  from 
The  French  by  Charles  A.  Carroll.  New  York:  Alfred 
A.  Knopf,  1920.     Pp.  xi+307.     $2.00. 

This  is  an  attempt  at  a  fair  account  of  the  rise  of  bolshevism  and  an 
appraisal  of  what  it  did  in  Russia  up  to  May,  1918. 

The  detailed  recital  of  events  in  chronological  order  is  straightfor- 
ward and  clear  but  for  the  confusion  of  names  of  individuals  and  of 
parties  and  factions  which  are  almost  meaningless  to  an  ordinary  reader 
in  this  country.  The  psychological  analysis  of  the  Russian  is  interest- 
ing, but  its  over-simpliiication  makes  one  feel  that  it  is  inadequate. 
After  describing  the  great  destruction  and  the  steady  disintegration  of 
nearly  all  traces  of  Western  civilization  the  final  prophecy  is  of  "a 
democracy  which  will  not  be  made  up  of  gradual  conquests,  plucked  by 
shreds  from  a  plutocratic  bourgeoisie,  but  which  will  build  itself  up  out 
of  the  very  stuff  of  the  people,  a  democracy  which  will  not  descend  from 
the  powerful  ones  to  the  people,  as  in  all  present  forms  of  society,  but 
which  will  rise  voluntarily  and  surely  from  the  unorganized  and  unculti- 
vated folk  to  an  organizing  intelUgence. 

Victor  E.  Helleberg 

University  of  Kansas 


RECENT  LITERATURE 


NOTES  AND  ABSTRACTS 

Social  Science  in  the  Colleges. — The  rise  of  social  science  is  one  of  the  most  inter- 
esting features  of  modern  intellectual  development.  A  hundred  years  ago  a  few 
"intellectuals"  interested  themselves  in  the  philosophy  of  history  and  in  certain 
abstract  theories  of  the  state.  Today  the  study  of  concrete  social  problems  has 
acquired  such  a  vogue  as  to  be  in  serious  danger  of  developing  into  a  popular  fad. 
During  the  past  century  the  problems  of  government,  of  industry,  of  education,  and 
of  every  phase  of  common  life  have  been  greatly  complicated.  Social  workers  have 
come  more  and  more  to  use  the  scientific  method  of  getting  at  the  fundamental  causes 
of  the  evils  in  society.  The  scientific  method  as  developed  in  the  nineteenth  century 
is  something  very  different  from  the  deductions  and  classifications  of  the  old  school 
men.  It  may  be  briefly  summarized  as  (i)  a  statement  of  the  problem,  (2)  seeking  for 
a  hypothesis,  (3)  collecting  relevant  data  by  observ-ation  and  experiment  for  the 
purpose  of  testing  the  hypothesis,  (4)  revising  the  statements  of  problem  and  hypothe- 
sis in  the  light  of  new  data,  (5)  the  assembling  of  other  data  bearing  on  the  revised 
hypothesis,  and  so  on  until  (6)  a  working  solution  has  been  found.  In  a  university, 
research  work  and  the  training  of  specialists  frequently  bulk  large,  but  in  a  college 
these  have  very  little  place.  Chief  among  the  functions  of  the  social  science  depart- 
ment in  a  college  are  these:  to  develop  a  healthy  interest  in  social  problems;  to  give 
information  about  social  problems;  to  train  habits  of  scientific  study  of  social  prob- 
lems; to  offer  vocational  guidance,  with  special  reference  to  social  work,  teaching, 
commerce  and  administration;  to  give  preliminary'  or  prevocational  training  for 
social  work,  teaching,  commerce  and  administration;  to  furnish  advice  to  public 
officials,  social  agencies,  and  the  community  at  large. — Stuart  A.  Queen,  Bulletin  of 
Gaucher  College,  June,  1920.  O.  B.  Y. 

Physiological  Aspect  of  the  Present  Unrest.— In  this  article  the  present  unrest 
will  be  looked  upon  as  a  social  disease  and  the  material  factors  connected  with  it  are 
uncontrollable  because  of  diseased  morale.  There  are  three  stages  in  the  analysis 
of  the  symptoms  of  the  social  disease,  (i)  Through  the  immediate  influence  of  the 
war  many  of  our  traditional  interests,  attitudes,  and  habits  were  abandoned  for  the 
sake  of  loyalty.  The  laborers  also  found  in  the  reduction  of  wages  their  status 
disturbed.  The  various  organizations,  such  as  the  Socialist  party,  the  Socialist 
Labor  party,  etc.,  whose  program  is  one  of  antagonism  to  existent  forms  of  government, 
took  advantage  of  the  war  situation.  Instead  of  using  peaceful  and  legitimate  means 
in  seeking  our  ends  we  have  accustomed  ourselves  in  this  great  struggle  to  the  argument 
of  force.     The  war  also  stimulated  our  interest  in  the  fundamental  philosophy  of  life. 

(2)  To  what  extent  the  present  difficulties  are  legitimate  results  of  pre-war  tendencies. 
The  industrial  revolution  and  the  change  from  individual  to  collective  production 
resulted  in  mental  changes,  such  as  the  loss  of-the  feeling  of  individual  responsibility 
on  the  part  of  the  workman.  The  second  phenomenon  is  the  conflict  between  labor 
and  capital  produced  by  co-operative  work  based  on  self-interests  of  each  group 
concerned  and  not  on  feeling  of  common  interest.  The  weakening  of  governmental 
and  religious  authority  has  had  somewhat  unstabilizing  influence  on   the  people. 

(3)  In  the  analysis  of  these  phenomena  the  underlying  psychological  forces  at  work 
are  the  instincts  of  self-preservation  and  of  preservation  of  species  as  expressed  in  the 
processes  of  adaptation  of  the  civilian  to  military  life  and  of  the  soldier  to  civil  life. — 
John  T.  MacCurdy,   The  Survey,  March,  1920.  C.  N. 

The  Logical  Implicates  of  the  Community. — If  the  ideal  human  society  is  an  all- 
inclusive  community  of  individuals  engaged  in  mutual  co-operation,  it  must  first  of  all 
rest  upon  a  common  understanding.     For  co-operation  without  understanding  is  not 

114 


RECENT  LITERATURE  115 

the  voluntary  co-operation  of  free  and  rational  beings.  There  are  many  kinds  and 
degrees  of  understanding.  If  we  call  the  more  abstract  understanding  logical,  we 
may  speak  of  the  more  concrete  as  ethical  and  aesthetic.  In  comparison  with  fulness 
and  richness  of  moral  and  aesthetic  conditions,  the  merely  logical  implicates  of  the 
community  must  seem  thin  and  abstract.  Unless  men  are  capable,  in  i)rinciplc,  of  a 
logical  understanding  of  one  another,  they  cannot  understand  one  another  either 
ethically  or  aesthetically,  since  moral  and  aesthetic  Judgments  also  incorporate  within 
them  the  forms  of  logical  judgment.  The  foremost  logical  principle  is  that  of  identity. 
It  is  a  principle  which  at  one  and  the  same  time  defines  the  individual  mind's  con- 
tinuity of  thinking  and  the  social  consciousness  of  a  common  thought  and  a  common 
worldl  It  asserts  that  meanings  of  all  kinds,  and  hence  also  the  corresponding  objects, 
may  be  apprehended  as  identically  the  same,  whether  by  the  same  mind  at  different 
times  or  by  different  minds  at  the  same  or  different  times.  It  asserts  further  that  the 
universe  of  discourse  is  the  same  for  all  minds  that  understand  each  other.  The 
conduct  of  all  meaningful  thought,  therefore,  whether  individual  or  social,  requires 
the  validity  of  this  law  as  its  first  condition.  The  next  principle  is  that  of  inference: 
that  judgments  may  be  concatenated  into  systems  of  logical  interdependence,  so  that 
one  or  several  judgments  may  serve  as  the  reason  for  a  conclusion.  The  third  is  the 
principle  of  causation,  which  asserts  that  things  behave  in  the  same  uniform  manner. 
The  fourth  is  the  principle  of  teleology,  which  explains  that  there  is  a  reason  for  all 
existing  things,  so  that  the  universe  has  a  rational  meaning.  All  these  principles 
underlie  various  aspects  of  the  community  life.  In  itself  the  logical  order  is  something 
pre-existing;  in  its  use  and  application  for  knowledge  and  life,  it  is  human  achievement. 
The  pre-existence  of  a  valid  logical  order  is  the  first  necessary  condition  for  the  realiza- 
tion of  the  true  community.  But  it  is  not  the  sole  or  sufficient  condition.  There  is  a 
host  of  real  and  ideal  conditions,  physical,  economic,  political,  aesthetic,  and  moral 
in  which  human  effort  can  be  a  directing  and  creative  force.  The  logical  order  is 
valid  and  necessary;  the  actual  order,  for  which  the  logical  order  furnishes  in  part 
the  framework,  is  at  one  and  the  same  time  a  beneficent  gift  and  moral  task  for  the 
highest  energies  of  free  man.— David  F.  Swenson,  Journal  of  Philosophy,  Psychology, 
Scientific  Methods,  May,  1920.  K.  S. 

Mekanisme  og  Vitalisme. — All  who  are  engaged  in  the  study  of  life  and  its  various 
functionings  are  aware  that  the  meaning  and  value  of  their  studies  are  dependent 
upon  the  same  premises  as  that  of  every  other  scientific  study.  The  conflict  which 
has  divided  biologists  into  two  camps  is  not  On  the  question  whether  or  no  life  is 
determined  by  causal  relations.  The  disagreement  is  on  the  subject  of  deciding  which 
set  of  conditions  should  be  reckoned  with  in  every  explanation  of  life  and  its  phe- 
nomena. On  one  side  are  the  biologists  who  see  in  life-phenomena  a  special  order 
of  mechanical  and  chemical  processes.  On  the  other  side  we  find  the  biologists  who 
think  there  is  something  in  the  living  organism  which  cannot  be  explained  as  a  mere 
complication  of  mechanical  and  chemical  processes.  J.  S.  Haldane,  in  his  essays 
entitled  The  New  Physiology,  calls  the  attempt  to  explain  life  as  a  chemical-mechanical 
process  "the  most  colossal  failure  in  the  whole  history  of  modern  science."  If  the 
organic  and  inorganic  processes  are  to  be  comprehended  in  the  same  categories,  he 
says,  our  whole  conception  of  dead  nature  must  be  radically  modified  and  must  be 
drawn  in  under  the  biological  point  of  view.  The  attempt  to  regard  the  world- 
process  as  a  harmonious  whole  is  a  biological  rather  than  a  mechanistic  conception. 
In  the  field  of  psychology  it  is  impossible  to  understand  the  relation  of  mind  and 
body  if  each  is  substantialized.  A  material  atom  cannot  be  put  into  motion  by  an 
idea  or  emotion.  To  accept  the  mechanistic  viewpoint  will  merely  serve  to  make  life 
and  consciousness  seem  increasingly  mystical,  the  more  mechanical  science  advances. — 
C.  N.  Starcke,  Tilskueren,  April,  1920.  O.  B.  Y. 

International  Education  of  World  Statesmen,  the  Key  to  Permanent  Peace. — 

Full  realization  of  Cecil  Rhodes's  conception  would  be  a  preventive  of  war  eminently 
more  reliable  than  expensive  armaments.  Reinforced  by  an  international  court  and 
police  force,  cosmopolitan  education  of  world-leaders  would  probably  prove  the 
precursor  of  permanent  peace.  The  plan  rests  on  the  sound  principle  that  friend- 
ship, which  may  induce  individual  self-sacrifice  to  the  extent  of  life  itself,  is  the  surest 


Ii6  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

guaranty  of  generous  compromise  between  peoples.  In  practical  operation  the 
Rhodes  scholarships,  because  their  opportunities  and  international  significance  have 
not  been  appreciated,  have  not  attracted  those  ablest  young  men  in  the  United  States 
through  whom  alone  the  American  and  English  branches  of  the  Anglo-Saxon  race 
could  form  strong  friendship.  The  Rhodes  scheme,  too,  embraces  only  two  of  the 
great  powers  within  its  scope.  Perfected  and  actualized,  then,  Rhodes's  plan  would 
appear  as  an  institution  whereby  prospective  leaders  of  all  the  great  nations,  through 
sojourns  in  cosmopolitan  centers  of  culture  such  as  Oxford  University,  would  become 
democratic  world-citizens  in  sj'mpathy  with  all  peoples  and  classes.  Reciprocity 
in  education  among  the  nations  is  an  application  to  the  sphere  of  international  relation- 
ships of  those  institutions  which  human  experience  has  proved  to  be  the  unrivaled 
developers  of  enlightened  self-interest  and  altruism  in  individuals.  National  selfish- 
ness is  as  many  times  more  vicious  than  individual  selfishness  as  falsely  patriotic  mil- 
lions are  more  able  to  do  harm  than  short-sighted  individuals.  The  gratifying 
effects  on  average  welfare  of  national  loyalty  to  world-welfare,  are  as  many  times 
those  of  individual  loyalty  to  national  welfare  as  the  world  is  bigger  than  the  nation 
and  as  truly  patriotic  millions  are  more  capable  of  accomplishing  good  than  far-sighted 
individuals. — Ralph  H.  Bevan,  Education,  April,  1920.  V.  M.  A. 

Social  Tyranny. — Not  only  in  the  realm  of  social  institutions,  but  sciences,  art, 
and  religion  are  all  held  under  the  popular  slogan  of  socialization.  We  are  daily 
reminded  by  federal  legislation,  by  the  Protestant  clergy,  by  our  moralists  and  penolo- 
gists, and  by  the  most  potent  of  modern  forces,  science,  business,  and  industry,  that 
the  individual  person  is  a  social  function.  This  is  partly  admirable  and  partly  vicious. 
A  man  should  cultivate  his  talents  and  his  solitary  pleasures,  not  only  because  they 
will  make  him  more  useful  to  his  fellows  but  also  because  they  are  in  themselves 
admirable.  Artistic  creation,  scientific  discovery,  spiritual  insight  are  indeed  valuable 
because  they  raise  the  level  of  society;  they  are  also  valuable  wholly  by  themselves. 
These  two  sorts  of  value  are  not  inherently  contradictory.  But  man  is  inherently 
inclined  to  treat  them  as  if  they  were.  The  evil  effects  of  the  excessive  deference  we 
pay  to  the  social  milieu  are  best  seen  in  the  higher  disciplines.  If  American  philosophy 
has  been  on  the  whole  unproductive,  that  is  because  it  has  not  respected  its  own  instinct 
for  metaphysics.  Our  schools  of  new  realism  and  pragmatism  have  but  followed  the 
standards  of  science:  the  former  on  the  whole  of  physics  and  mathematics,  the  latter 
of  biology.  The  deeper  need  of  our  time,  of  aU  times  in  fact,  is  that  principle  of 
duality  which  corrects  exclusive  individuahsm  and  exclusive  sociality  alike;  which 
supplements  the  ideal  of  organic  unity  by  the  ideal  of  independent  indivdduaUty; 
and  which,  when  the  two  ideals  cannot  be  harmoniously  joined,  points  the  way  to 
compromise.  When  the  state  exercises  its  sovereignty  in  every  way  as  it  does  now, 
it  kills  all  individuality  and  eventually  itself.  It  must,  therefore,  voluntarily  abdicate 
its  sovereignty  in  those  matters  wherein  the  individuals  show  their  initiative  and 
gain  personal  satisfactions.  The  state  must  ultimately  limit  its  function  to  that  of 
arbitration  between  disputing  parties. — W.  H.  Sheldon,  Philosophical  Review,  March, 
1920.  K.  S. 

Community  Americanization:  A  Handbook  for  Workers. — Technically  the 
word  "Americanization"  means  "the  process  of  making  Americans."  To  accomplish 
this  we  must  first  possess  the  American  spirit  ourselves.  We  must  have,  besides, 
some  knowledge  of  those  we  seek  to  bring  into  the  brotherhood;  a  knowledge  of  their 
difficulties;  a  knowledge  and  appreciation  of  their  cultures.  A  community  survey 
should  be  made  in  order  to  understand  the  situation,  and  the  pamphlet  devotes  ten 
pages  to  a  suggested  plan.  A  knowledge  of  the  English  language  is  indispensable  to 
all  who  are  to  be  truly  Americans.  To  attempt  to  use  a  compulsorj'  system  upon  the 
adults,  however,  would  be  fatal  to  the  cause.  They  must  be  skilfully  led  to  see  the 
advantages  accruing  to  them  from  a  knowledge  of  English  and  then  the  community 
should  see  to  it  that  every  possible  opportunity  is  offered  to  them  to  learn.  Teachers 
who  understand  teaching  English  to  foreign  adults  should  be  supplied  by  the  school 
boards.  But  the  language  is  only  a  beginning.  Hitherto  we  have  resented  foreigners 
invading  the  native-born  sections  of  our  cities  and  thereby  we  have  kept  them  in 
colonies  which  have  not  received  the  attention  bestowed  upon  other  sections  of  the 


RECENT  LITERATURE  117 

cities.  Hence  come  housing  evils,  overcrowding,  and  filth,  so  that  many  immigrants 
are  thrust  into  conditions  of  life  far  below  the  standards  of  health  and  decency  to 
which  they  were  accustomed  in  their  own  lands.  This  must  be  changed  and  all  the 
deceitful  schemes  for  swindling  immigrants  must  be  abolished  before  we  can  expect 
the  foreigners  among  us  to  be  true  Americans.  Thus,  great  is  the  task  before  us. 
Fortunately,  however,  there  is  a  great  deal  of  machinery  with  which  to  do  the  work 
already  at  hand  in  every  community.  The  crying  need  is  for  co-ordination  of  this 
machinery'.  A  central  committee  engaged  by  the  national  government  is  suggested, 
then  state  and  finally  community  committees  should  be  established  for  this  purpose. 
U.S.  Bureau  of  Education  Bulletin,  No.  76,  19 19.  S.  C.  R. 

Rural  Socialization. — Socialization  is  the  integration  of  group  consciousness  and 
conduct.  The  process  of  socializing  the  rural  neighborhood  is  fraught  with  difEculties. 
The  social  instinct  of  the  American  rural  people  has  become  partially  dormant  during 
the  period  of  lonely  pioneer  life.  There  are,  however,  four  stages  of  co-operation  for 
socialization:  (i)  Associational  level,  one  of  instinctive  pleasure  and  also  of  least 
possible  cost.  Neighborhood  meetings  of  almost  any  kind  conduce  to  the  growth  of 
the  social  disposition  in  those  associating.  Assemblages  should  appeal  to  the  play 
instinct,  which  is  strongly  reinforced  by  the  social  instinct.  (2)  The  work  stage, 
the  range  of  which  is  limited  and  tends  to  become  more  so  under  modern 
conditions.  (3)  The  economic  level,  where  the  business  end  of  agriculture  is  involved. 
Community  selling  and  buying,  ownership  of  tools,  grain  elevators,  storage  warehouses 
are  good  examples  of  economic  co-operation  yielding  immediate  pleasure  to  utilitarian 
incentives  and  satisfactions;  (4)  the  cultural  or  welfare  level  of  socialization,  where  far 
more  remote  utilitarian  interests  furnish  the  motives  and  the  cost  to  the  group  has 
become  the  greatest  yet  demanded.  The  dynamic  forces  behind  co-operation  are 
manifold.  Instincts,  desires,  ideas,  as  well  as  environmental,  social,  and  economical 
pressures  have  acted  as  controlling  agencies.  But  the  real  and  only  dependable 
agency  is  personal  leadership.  Rural  teachers,  pastors,  county  agents,  and  perhaps 
others  are  those  upon  whom  must  fall  the  task  of  socializing  the  country  neighborhoods 
of  America. — Newell  L.  Sims,  Political  Science  Quarterly,  March,  1920.  C.  N. 

Revolution  und  Gewaltlosigkeit.    Zum  Jahrestag  des  Neunten  November. — It  was 

pleasurable  for  the  German  people  to  recall,  on  the  anniversary  of  the  German  Revolu- 
tion, that  it  took  place  almost  without  loss  of  life.  The  years  of  war  seemed  to  the 
co-workers  toward  cultural  progress  the  greatest  crime  against  humanity.  Both 
within  Germany  and  abroad  a  small  group  of  men  and  women  could  be  found  who 
saw  that  the  foundations  and  development  of  a  new  sex  morality,  conditions  conducive 
to  the  welfare  of  yet  unborn  generations,  are  capable  of  realization  only  in  a  world 
that  has  forever  broken  with  bloody  force.  It  is  painful  to  contemplate  how  limited 
is  the  understanding  of  the  fact  that  only  in  a  world  without  force  can  civilization  be 
built  up.  Those  who  disapproved  of  the  use  of  force  between  nations,  now  approve  of 
its  application  to  the  internal  dissensions.  Only  a  small  minority  favor  disarmament 
in  civil  strife,  and  they  are  viewed  as  inimical  to  the  majority.  A  strong  protest 
should  be  made  against  the  continuation  of  the  dangerous  principle  that  "might 
makes  right."  The  simple  fact  that  a  class  has  had  a  hard  struggle  does  not  enable 
it  to  bring  welfare  to  humanity.  As  long  as  this  class  is  just  as  much  determined  to 
secure  its  own  advantages  as  the  class  previously  in  power,  a  mere  change  as  regards 
the  powers  in  its  possession  could  achieve  no  beneficial  results  for  humanity.  The 
attitudes  of  men  must  change  and  human  life  must  be  considered  sacred.  But  a  change 
of  attitude  caimot  come  until  we  do  away  with  this  Blut-moral  war.  Before  the  war 
we  struggled  for  a  refinement  of  culture  by  striving  for  the  protection  of  future  genera- 
tions, the  yet  unborn  child,  motherhood  in  despair,  and  we  struggled  against  the 
efifects  of  force  in  the  relations  between  the  sexes.  Our  progress  in  the  field  of  the 
morality  of  the  sexes  will  depend  on  the  realization  of  higher  standards  in  the  world 
at  large.     Dr.  Helena  Stocker,  Die  Neue  Generation,  September,  19 19.         L.  M.  S. 


ii8 


THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 


BIBLIOGRAPHY 


BOOKS 


Ainslie,  Peter.  If  Not  a  United  Church 
— WTiat?  New  York:  Revell.  Pp. 
132.     $1.00. 

Allen,  Stephen  H.  International  Rela- 
tions. Princeton:  Princeton  Univer- 
sity Press.     Pp.  iv-l-672.     $5.00. 

American  Academy  of  Political  and  Social 
Science.  The  New  American  Thrift. 
Philadelphia:  The  Academy.  Pp. 
v-l-248.     $1.00. 

.     The  Railroad  Problem:    A  Dis^ 

cussion  of  Current  Railway  Issues. 
Philadelphia:  The  Academy.  Pp.  viii 
-f252.     Si. 00. 

Anderson,  B.  M.  Effects  of  the  War  on 
Money,  Credit  and  Banking  in  France 
and  the  United  States.  New  York: 
0.xford  University  Press.     Pp.  227. 

Anderson,  George  Wood.  Problem  or 
Opportunity  ?  WTiich  Is  It  the  Church 
Is  Now  Facing?  New  York:  Revell. 
Pp.  159.     $1 .00. 

Andreyev,  Leonid.  Wlien  the  King 
Loses  His  Head.  New  York:  Inter- 
national Book  Publishing  Co.  Pp.  306. 

Attlee,  C.  R.  The  Social  Worker.  Lon- 
don:  Bell.     Pp.  294.     6.y. 

Ayrinhac,  Henry  A.  Penal  Legislation 
in  the  New  Code  of  Canon  Law.  New 
York:  Benziger,  98  Park  Place.  Pp. 
392.     $3.00. 

Baker,  Ray  Stannard.  The  New  Indus- 
trial Unrest:  Reasons  and  Remedies; 
Garden  City,  N.Y.:  Doubleday.  Pp. 
vi-l-231.    $2.00. 

Beard,  Mary  Ritter.  A  Short  History  of 
the  American  Labor  Movement.  New 
York:   Harcourt.     Pp.  174.     $1.50. 

Begbie,  Harold.  The  Life  of  General 
William  Booth,  the  Founder  of  the 
Salvation  Army.  New  York:  Mac- 
millan.  2  vols.  Pp.  xv-(-446;  xv-|- 
465.     $10.50. 

Below,  Prof.  Georg  v.  Soziologie  als 
Lehrfach.  Ein  krit.  Beitrag  z.  Hoch- 
schul-reform.  Miinchen:  Duncker  & 
Humblot.     Pp.  60. 

Birdseye,  Clarence  F.  American  De- 
mocracy versus  Prussian  Mar.xism. 
New  York:    Revell.     Pp.371.    $2.50. 

Blanchard,  Phyllis.  The  adolescent  Girl : 
A  Study  from  the  Psychoanalytic  View- 
point. New  York:  Moffat.  Pp.  242. 
$2.50. 


Bloomfield,  Meyer.  The  New  Labour 
Movement  in  Great  Britain:  Manage- 
ment and  Men.     London:    Unwin,  T. 

Fisher,  Ltd.     Pp.  606.     los.  6d. 

Boucke,  O.  Fred.  The  Limits  of  Social- 
ism.    New     York:      Macmillan.     Pp. 

259-  . 

Bovensiepen,  Dr.  Landger-R.  Wissen- 
schaftlicher  Sozialismus,  Kommunis- 
mus,  Anarchismus  u.  Bolschewismus. 
Eine  erste,  gemeinverstandlich-wissen- 
schaftl.  Einfiihrung.  Neumiinster: 
Verlagsanstalt  R.  Hieron>Tnus.    Pp.  80. 

Braun,  Dr.  Erich.  Freiheit  u.  Staat.  Ein 
Beitrag  z.  Losung  d.  sozialen  Frage. 
Dresden:   Globus.     Pp.  viii+216. 

Bridges,  James  W.  An  Outline  of  Abnor- 
mal Psychology.  Columbus,  Ohio: 
R.G.Adams.     Pp.126.     Si.  25. 

Brooks,  John  G.  Labor's  Challenge  to 
the  Social  Order.  New  York:  Mac- 
millan.    Pp.441.     $2.75. 

Bryant,  Sophie  W.  Moral  and  Religious 
Education.  New  York:  Longmans. 
Pp.  viii -|- 256.     $1.90. 

Bunau-Varilla,  Philippe.  The  Great  Ad- 
venture of  Panama.  \\Tierein  are  ex- 
posed its  relation  to  the  great  war  and 
also  the  luminous  traces  of  the  German 
conspiracies  against  France  and  the 
United  States.  Garden  City,  N.Y.: 
Doubleday.     Pp.  xv+267.     $1.75. 

Bury,  J.  B.  The  Idea  of  Progress:  .\n 
Inquiry  into  Its  Origin  and  Growth. 
London:    Macmillan.     Pp.  392.     145. 

Butler.  Nicholas  Murray.  Is  America 
Worth  Saving?  New  York:  Scrib- 
ner.     Pp.  xiii -1-398.     $2.00. 

Butterfield,  Kenyon  L.  The  Farmer  and 
the  New  Day.  New  York:  Mac- 
millan.    Pp.311.     $2.00. 

Cahen,  Georges.  L'Autre  Guerre.  Es- 
sais  d'assistance  et  d'hygiene  sociales, 
1905-20.  Paris:  Berger-Le\Tault.  Pp. 
162.     Fr.  4. 

Carnegie,  David.  Can  Church  and  In- 
dustry Unite?  Edinburgh:  Marshall 
Bros.     Pp.  181.     35.  6d. 

Carnegie  Endowment  for  International 
Peace.  A  Manual  of  the  Public  Bene- 
factions of  Andrew  Carnegie.  Wash- 
ington:  The  Endowment.     Pp.  321. 

Chittick,  Alexander.  Social  Evolution. 
Peoria,  Illinois:  The  Author.     Pp.124. 


RECENT  LITERATURE 


119 


Chrisman,  Oscar.  The  Historical  Child: 
Paidology — the  Science  of  the  Child. 
Boston:    Badger.     Pp.  471.     $4.00. 

Clark,  Bamett  H.  European  Theories 
of  the  Drama.  London:  G.  Parker. 
22s.  6d. 

Clark,  Coleman  T.,  and  Clark,  Salter  S. 
Soldier  Letters:  Their  Stories  in 
E.xtracts  from  their  Letters  and 
Diaries.  Westfield,  New  Jersey:  S. 
S.  Clark.     Pp.  174. 

Cole,  George  D.  H.  Social  Theory. 
New  York:   Stokes.     Pp.220.     $1.50. 

Cooley,  Anne  M.,  and  Spohr,  Wilhelmina 
H.  Household  Arts  for  Home  and 
School.  New  York:  Macmillan.  2 
vols.     Pp.  Lx+433;   viii+436.     $3.20. 

Corson,  Oscar  T.  Our  Public  Schools, 
Their  Teachers,  Pupils,  and  Patrons. 
New  York:  American  Book  Company. 
Pp.  283.     $1.28. 

Crowder,  Maj.-Gen.  E.  H.  The  Spirit 
of  Selective  Service.  New  York: 
Century.     Pp.  367.     $2.00. 

Crowther,  Samuel.  Common  Sense  and 
Labor.  Garden  City,  N.Y.:  Double- 
day.     Pp.  v+284.     $2.00. 

Cynn,  Hugh  Heung-Wo.  The  Rebirth  of 
Korea.  New  York:  Abingdon  Press. 
Pp.  272.     $1.50. 

Davies,  A.  Emil.  The  Case  for  National- 
ization. London:  Allen  &  Unwin. 
Pp.  310.     4^.  6d. 

Davies,  John  L.  Militarism  in  Educa- 
tion.   London:   Swarthmore.    Pp.154. 

Day,  James  R.  My  Neighbor,  the 
Workingman.  New  York:  Abingdon 
Press.     Pp.  373.     $2.50. 

Deshumbert,  M.  An  Ethical  System 
Based  on  the  Laws  of  Nature.  Chi- 
cago: Open  Court  Publishers,  122  S. 
Michigan  Ave.     Pp.231.     $0.75. 

Dewey,  John  and  Dewey,  Hattie  A.  C. 
Letters  from  China  and  Japan.  New 
York:   Dutton.     Pp.  vi-l-311.     $2.50. 

Dick,  J.  L.  Defective  Housing  and  the 
Growth  of  Children.  London:  Allen 
&  Unwin.     Pp.  94.     3^.  6d. 

Dodd,  William  E.  Woodrow  Wilson 
and  His  Work.  Garden  City,  N.Y.: 
Doubleday.     Pp.  xiv+369.     $3.00. 

Douglas,  C.  H.  Economic  Democracy. 
New  York:  Harcourt.  Pp.  ix -1-144. 
$1.60. 

Doyme,  Alfred  R.  L.  The  Brotherhood 
of  Man:  An  Appeal  to  the  Nations. 
Baltimore:  Norman,  Remington  Co. 
Pp.  vii-l-92.     $1 .00. 

Duguit,  Leon.  Law  in  the  Modem 
State.    Translated    from    French    by 


Frida  and  Harold  J.  Laski.     New  York: 

Huebsch.     Pp.  xliv-l-248.    $2.30. 
Dunlap,  Knight.     Personal  Beauty  and 

Racial  Betterment.    St.Louis:  Mosby. 

Pp-  95- 
Dunn,  Courtenay.    The  Natural  History 

of  the  Child.     New  York:    J.  Lane. 

Pp.316.    $2.00. 
Einstein,  Lewis.     A  Prophecy  of  the  War. 

New     York:      Columbia     University 

Press.     Pp.  94. 
Elliott,  Ernest  E.     How  to  Advertise  a 

Church.     New  York:  Doran.     Pp.93. 

$1.50- 
Eulenburg,    Franz.     Arten  u.  Stufen  d. 

Sozialisierung.  Ein  Gutachsten.     Miin- 

chen:    Duncker  &  Humblot.     Pp.  48. 
Evans,  Elida.     The  Problem  of  the  Ner- 
vous Child.     New  York:   Dodd.     Pp. 

viii-(-299.     $2.50. 
Fagnot,  F.     La  Part  du  travail  dans  la 

gestion    des    entreprises.     Paris:     M. 

Riviere  &  Cie.     Pp.  263.     Fr.  4.50. 
Feld,     R.     C.     Humanizing     Industry. 

New  York:  Dutton.     Pp.390.     $2.50. 
Freeman,    Arnold.     Education    through 

Settlements.     London:    Allen   &   Un- 
win.    Pp.  63.     IS.  6d. 
Freund,  Ernst.     Illegitimacy  Laws  of  the 

United    States    and    Certain    Foreign 

Countries.     Washington:     Govt.   Ptg. 

Office.     Pp.  260.     $0.35. 
Fryer,    Jane    E.     Community    Interest 

and  Public  Spirit.     Philadelphia :  Win- 
ston.    Pp.  xvi-f  282.     $0.60. 
Galeot,  A.  L.     Les  Systemes  sociaux  et 

I'organisations  des  nations   modemes. 

Paris:    Nouvelle  Librairie  Nationale. 

Pp.  400.     Fr.  15. 
Galletti,    Alfredo.     LTtalia    e   la    Pace. 

Milano:  Studio  ed.  Corbaccio.    Pp.  75 

L.2.50. 
Gaston,  Herbert  E.     The  Non-Partisan 

League.     New  York:    Harcourt.     Pp. 

vii4-325.     $1.75- 
Gibbs,  PMlip  H.     Now  It  Can  Be  Told. 

New  York:  Harper.     Pp.558.     $3.00. 
Gilchrist,    R.    N.     Indian    Nationality. 

New   York:    Longmans.     Pp.   xviii-H 

246.     $2.75. 
Goddard,  Henry  Herbert.     Human  Effi- 
ciency   and    Levels    of    Intelligence. 

Princeton:  Princeton  University  Press. 

Pp.  vii-l-128.     $1.50. 
Goode,  William  T.     Bolshevism  at  Work. 

New  York;  Harcourt.   Pp.143.    $ioo- 
Grey,    Viscount    Edward.     Recreation. 

Boston:    Houghton.     Pp.  43.     $125. 
Gros,    F.     L'Assurance,    son    sens    his- 

torique    et    social.     Paris:     Edit,    du 


I20 


THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 


Bureau     d'organisation     6conomique. 

Pp.312.     Fr.  s. 
Harris,  H.  Wilson.     The  Peace  in  the 

Making.     New   York:     Button.     Pp. 

ix.  235.     $2.00. 
Hartley,  C.  Gasquoine.    Women's  Wild 

Oats.    New  York:    Stokes.    Pp.  238. 

$1.50. 
Harvey,  Lucile  S.     Food  Facts  for  the 

Home-Maker.     Boston:        Houghton. 

Pp.  xiv+314.     $2.50. 
Hausenstein,    Wilh.     Die    groszen    Uto- 

pisten   (Fourier,  Saint-Simon,  Owen). 

Berlin:   Buchh.  Vorwarts.     Pp.  64. 
Higham,     Charles    Frederick.     Looking 

Forward:     Mass    Education    through 

Publicity.     London:    J.  Nisbet  &  Co. 

Pp.  183.      125.  6d. 

Hirsch,  Paul.    Kommunalpolitische  Prob- 

leme.      Vortriige    an    d.     Universitat 

Berlin.      Leipzig:     Quelle    &  Meyer. 

Pp.  vii-fi6o. 
Hobson,   J.   A.     Taxation   in   the   New 

State.    New  York :  Harcourt.    Pp.258. 
Hodges,  Frank.     Nationalization  of  the 

Mines.     London:     Leonard    Parsons. 

Pp.  170.     45  6d. 
Hollander,   Jacob   H.     War   Borrowing. 

New    York:      Macmillan.     Pp.     215. 

$1 . so. 
Holmes,  John  Haynes.     Is  Violence  the 

Way  Out  of  Our  Industrial  Disputes  ? 

New    York:     Dodd.     Pp.    xvii-l-130. 

$3  •  00. 
Howard,    Harry    F.     Capital    Against 

Labor:  or  The  Next  War.     Rochester, 

New  Hampshire:    The  Author.     Pp. 

xi+141.    $1.00. 
Howe,  Frederick  C.     The  Land  and  the 

Soldier.   New  York:  Scribner.   Pp.196. 

$i-35- 

House,  Elwin  Lincoln.  The  Drama  of 
the  Face:  and  Other  Studies  in 
Applied  Psychology.  New  York: 
Revell.     Pp.  258.     $1.75. 

Hughes,  James  L.  Adult  and  Child: 
How  to  Help,  How  Not  to  Hinder: 
A  Study  of  Development  by  Comrade- 
ship. Syracuse,  N.Y.:  C.  W.  Bar- 
deen.     Pp.  187.     $1.00. 

Industrial  Administration.  A  series  of 
lectures  by  various  authors.  New 
York:   Longmans.     Pp.  203.     $3.00. 

Jay,  William.  War  and  Peace.  New 
York:    Oxford  University  Press.     Pp. 

69- 

Johnson,  F.  Ernest.  The  New  Spirit  in 
Industry.  New  York:  Association 
Press.     Pp.95.     $0.75. 

Joslyn,  Rodolphus  W.  Twelfth  Com- 
mandment:  Thou  Shalt  Not  Profit  by 


the  Labor  of  Other  Men.  Elgin, 
Illinois:  Normalist  Publishers.  Pp. 
123.    $0.75. 

Jung,  Carl  G.,  Ed.  Studies  in  Word- 
Association.  Experiments  in  the  diag- 
nosis of  psycopathological  conditions 
carried  out  at  the  Psychiatric  Clinic  of 
the  University  of  Zurich.  New  York: 
Moffat.     Pp.  9+575.     $6.00. 

Kaisenberg,  Dr.  Georg.  Die  Kleingar- 
ten-  u.  Kleinpachtlandordnung,  erlaut. 
Berlin:   F.  Vahlen.     Pp.  169. 

Kennedy,  H.  A.  A.  The  Theology  of  the 
Epistles.  New  York:  Scribner.  Pp. 
267.     $1.75. 

Lansing,  Marion  F.,  and  Gulick,  Luther 
H.  Food  and  Life.  A  textbook  for 
children.  Boston:  Ginn.  Pp.  vii-|- 
182.     $0.68. 

Larsen,  Christian.  Farm  Dairying. 
New  York:  Judd.  Pp.  xii+315. 
$2.00. 

Leach,  Albert  E.,  and  Winton,  Andrew 
L.  Food  Inspection  and  Analysis. 
4th  ed.  New  York:  Wiley.  Pp. 
xix+1090.     $8.50. 

Leui,  C.  Trattate  Teorico-Pratico  di 
Construzioni  Civili,  Rurali,  Stradali, 
ed.  Idrauliche.  Casanova:  F.  e  C, 
Torino.     Pp.  751.     L.25. 

Litchfield,  Paul  W.  The  Industrial 
Republic.  Boston:  Houghton.  Pp. 
95.     $1.00. 

Lloyd,  J.  A.  T.  Prestige.  London: 
S.  Paul.     Pp.  334.     75. 

Lokerman,  A.  Les  Bolcheviks  a  I'oeuvre. 
Paris:  M.  Riviere  et  Cie.  Pp.  140. 
Fr.  4. 

Lorebum,  Earl.  How  the  War  Came. 
New  York:   Knopf.     Pp.340.     $3.00. 

Lowie  Robert  H.  Primitive  Society. 
New  York:  Boni  &  Liveright.  Pp. 
463.    $3 .  00. 

Lucas,  James.  Co-operation  in  Scot- 
land. Manchester:  Co-operative 
Union.     Pp.  93.     25.  6d. 

McAfee,  Cleland  B.  The  Christian 
Faith  and  the  New  Day.  New  York: 
Macmillan.     Pp.  74.     $0.90. 

McClure,  Royal  A.  Lectures  of  Interest 
to  Women.  Published  in  interest  of 
better  babies,  healthier  mothers,  and 
painless  childbirth.  2d  ed.  rev. 
Seattle,  Washington:  Seattle  Mater- 
nity Hospital.     Pp.  426-I-9.     $5.00. 

McGovern,  William  M.  Modern  Japan; 
Its  Political,  Military  and  Industrial 
Organization.  New  York:  Scribner. 
Pp.  280.     $5.00. 


RECENT  LITERATURE 


121 


McMillan,  Margaret.  The  Nursery 
School.  New  York:  Dutton.  Pp. 
356.     $4.00. 

MacMurchy,  Helen.  The  Almosts:  A 
Study  of  the  Feeble-minded.  Boston: 
Houghton.     Pp.  178.     $1.50. 

Maeztu  (Ramiro) .  La  Crisis  del  Human- 
ismo.  Barcelona:  Imp.  La  Paligrafa. 
Pp.  366.     L.  s. 

Mead,  George  Whitefield.  The  Great 
Menace:  Americanism  or  Bolshevism  ? 
New  York:  Dodd.  Pp.  ix+153. 
$1.25. 

Mecklin,  John  M.  .\n  Introduction  to 
Social  Ethics:  The  Social  Conscience 
in  a  Democracy.  New  York:  Har- 
court.     Pp.  iv+446.     $2.75. 

Mellor,  Stanley  A.  Jesus  Christ  and 
Social  Change.  London:  Swarthmore 
Press.     Pp.  148.     35.  6d. 

Menendez,  Ormaza.  La  Cuesti6n  Social 
en  sus  relaciones  con  los  distintos 
modernos  Sistemas  de  Pago  de  Salarias. 

Madrid:  Imp.  de  la  Vinda  de  Alvarez. 
Pp.  194.     Pes.  5. 

Mondolfo,  R.  Sulle  Orme  di  Marx: 
Studi  di  Marxismo  e  Socialismo. 
Bologna:  Cappelli  L.     Pp.170.     L.  6. 

Moody,  John.  The  Masters  of  Capital: 
A  Chronicle  of  Wall  Street.  (Chroni- 
cles of  America  Series,  Vol.  41.)  New 
Haven:  Yale  University  Press.  Pp. 
ix+234.     Set  of  50  vols.     $175.00. 

Mordell,  Albert.  The  Erotic  Motive  in 
Literature.  New  York:  Boni.  Pp. 
250.     $1.75. 

Morgan,  Herbert.  The  Social  Task  in 
Wales.  London:  Student  Christian 
Movement.     Pp.  94.     2s. 

Mulon,  D.  C.  Manuel  elementaire  de 
puericulture.  Paris:  Masson  &  Cie. 
Pp.  194.     Fr.  4.50. 

Nalder,  Frank  Fielding.  The  American 
State  Reformatory:  With  special  ref- 
erence to  its  educational  aspects. 
Berkeley:  University  of  California. 
Pp.  178.     Si.  80. 

National  Conference  on  Americanization 
in  Industries.  Proceedings,  Nan- 
tasket  Beach,  Mass.,  June  22-24, 
19 19.  Boston:  G.  F.  Quimby,  In- 
dustrial Service  Sec,  Associated  Indus- 
tries of  Mass.,  1034  Kimball  Bldg. 
Pp.  144.     $1 .00. 

National  Conference  of  Social  Work. 
Proceedings  at  the  46th  Annual  Ses- 
sion, Atlantic  City,  N.J.,  June  1-8, 
1919.  Chicago:  C.  C.  Carsens,  Sec, 
315  Plymouth  Court.  Pp.  813. 
Membership,  $3.00. 


Negri,  A.  Diritto  Penale.  Padova:  La 
Litolipe  Editrice  Universtaria.  Pp. 
308.     L.  15. 

.     Procedura    Penale.     La    Litelipe 

Editorice  Universtaria.  Pp.  223.  L. 
12. 

Newman,  F.  J.  Romance  and  Law  in 
the  Divorce  Court.  London:  Andrew 
Melrose.     Pp.  332.     6s. 

O'Donnell,  Elliot.  The  Menace  of  Spirit- 
ualism. New  York:  Stokes.  Pp.  xii 
+  206.     $1.50. 

Oriani,  Alfredo.  Matriomonio.  Bari: 
G.  Laterza  e  Figli.     Pp.  329.     L.  6.50. 

Orth,  Samuel  P.  The  Armies  of  Labor: 
A  Chronicle  of  the  Organized  Wage- 
Earners.  Chronicles  of  America 
Series,  Vol.  40.)  New  Haven:  Yale 
University  Press.  Pp.  ix-(-279.  Set 
of  50  vols.     $175.00. 

.     Our  Foreigners:    A  Chronicle  of 

Americans  in  the  Making.  (Chron- 
icles of  America  Series,  Vol.  35.)  New 
Haven:  Yale  University  Press.  Pp. 
xi-l-255.     Set  of  50  vols.     $175.00. 

Parker,  Carleton  H.  The  Casual  La- 
borer, and  Other  Essays.  New  York: 
Harcourt.     Pp.  199.     $2.00. 

Paulhan,  Fr.  Les  transformations  so- 
ciales  des  sentiments.  Bibliotheque  de 
phUosophie  scientifique.  Paris:  E. 
Flammarion.     Pp.  288.     Fr.  5 .  75. 

Peacock,  N.,  Ed.  The  Russian  Almanac, 
1919.  London:  Eyre  &  Spottiswoode. 
Pp.  209.     £.5. 

Pearl,  Raymond.  The  Nation's  Food: 
A  Statistical  Study  of  a  Physiological 
and  Social  Problem.  Philadelphia: 
Saunders.     Pp.  274.     $3.50. 

Perry,  Arthur  Reed.  Preventable  Death 
in  Cotton  Manufacturing  Industry. 
Washington:  Govt.  Ptg.  Office.  Pp. 
534.     $0.30. 

Pierce,  F.  Dormer.  Problems  of  Pleas- 
ure Towns.  London:  Society  for  Pro- 
moting Christian  Knowledge.  Pp. 
79.     IS.  6d. 

Pillet,   A.     Le  Traite  de  Paix  de  Ver- 
sailles.    Paris:    Librairie  des  Sciences 
Politiaues  et  Sociales.     Pp.  107. 
Pollock,"  Sir     Frederick.     The    League 
of  Nations.     New  York:    Macmillan. 
Pp.  XV+251.     $4.00. 
Powell,  E.  Ale.xander.     The  New  Fron- 
tiers of  Freedom;  from  the  Alps  to  the 
Aegean.     New   York:    Scribner.     Pp. 
xv-l-263.     $2.50. 
Queen,   Stuart  A.     The  Passing  of  the 
County  Jail.     Menasha,  Wis. :   Banta. 
Pp.  156- 


122 


THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 


Quin,  Malcolm.  Politics  of  the  Pro- 
letariat: A  Contribution  to  the 
Science  of  Citizenship,  Based  Chiefly 
on  the  Sociology  of  Auguste  Comte. 
London:  Allen  &  Unwin.    Pp.155.    5^- 

Red  Band,  pseud.  A  Prisoner  of  Pen- 
tonville,  by  "Red  Band."  With  a 
foreword  by  Joseph  Fort  Newton. 
New  York:  Putnam.  Pp.  114. 
Si. 50. 

Rew,  Robert  H.  Food  Supplies  in  Peace 
and  War.  New  York:  Longmans. 
Pp.  vii+183.     $2.25. 

Roberts,  Richard.  The  Unfinished  Pro- 
gramme of  Democracy.  New  York: 
Huebsch.     Pp.  326.     $2.00. 

Rosanoff,  Aaron  J.,  Ed.  Manual  of  Psy- 
chiatry. 5th  ed.  New  York:  Wiley. 
Pp.  684. 

Russell,  Bertrand.  Principles  of  Social 
Reconstruction.  London:  ^\llen  & 
Unwin.     Pp.  250.     35.  6d. 

.    Roads    to    Freedom:     Socialism, 

Anarchism  and  Syndicalism.  Lon- 
don: Allen  &  Unwin.  Pp.  215. 
35.  6d. 

Ryan,  John  Augustine.  The  Church 
and  Socialism.  Washington:  Univer- 
sity Press.     Pp.251.     $1.50. 

Saunderson,  F.  W.  Government  Service. 
An  essay  toward  reconstruction.  Lon- 
don:   Faith  Press.     Pp.   133.     is.  6d. 

SchmoUer,  Gustav.  Grundrisz  d.  allge- 
meinen  Volkswirtschaftslehre.  Miin- 
chen:   Duncker  &  Humblot. 

Scott,  Arthur  P.  An  Introduction  to  the 
Peace  Treaties.  Chicago:  University 
of  Chicago.     Pp.292.     $2.00. 

Scott,  James  B.  Judicial  Settlement  of 
Controversies  between  States  of  the 
American  Union.  An  analysis  of 
cases  decided  in  the  supreme  court. 
Oxford:  Clarendon.     Pp.  548. 

Seashore,  Carl  E.  The  Psychology  of 
Musical  Talent.  Boston:  Silver,  Bur- 
dett  &  Co.     Pp.  xvi-f-288.     $2.40. 

Seeley,  Boudinot.  Christian  Social  Hy- 
giene: A  Guide  for  Youth.  Portland, 
Oregon:  The  Author.  Pp.  iv-l-152. 
$1.25. 

Selley,  Ernest.  Village  Trade  Unions  in 
Two  Centuries.  New  York:  Mac- 
millan.     Pp.  182.     $1.50. 

Sharp,  Dallas  L.  Patrons  of  Democracy. 
Boston:  Atlantic  Monthly  Press.  Pp. 
vii4-56.     $0.80. 

Sherrill,  Charles  H.  Have  We  a  Far 
Eastern  Policy?  New  York:  Scrib- 
ner.     Pp.  xvi-t-307.     $2.50. 


Smith,  W.  W.  A  Theory  of  Mechanism 
of  Survival:  The  Fourth  Dimension 
and  Its  Applications.  London:  K. 
Paul.     Pp.  195.     55. 

Snowden,  Philip.  Wages  and  Prices. 
An  inquiry  into  the  wages  system  and 
the  relation  of  wages  and  prices. 
London:  Faith  Press.  Pp.  131.  is. 
6d. 

Starling,  E.  H.  Oliver-Sharpey  Lect- 
ures on  the  Feeding  of  Nations.  A 
study  in  applied  physiology.  New 
York:   Longmans.     Pp.  146. 

St.  Clair,  Labert.  The  Story  of  the 
Libery  Loans.  Being  a  record  of  the 
volunteer  liberty  loan  army,  its  per- 
sonnel, mobilization,  and  methods. 
Washington,  324  Munsey  Building: 
J.  W.  Bryan  Press.     Pp.  186.     $5.00. 

Stewart,  Wentworth.  The  Making  of  a 
Nation.  Boston:  Stratford.  Pp.  ix 
-fi90.     $1.50. 

Stifler,  James  M.  The  Christ  of  Christi- 
anity. 2d  ed.  New  York:  Revell. 
Pp.  222.     $1 .  25. 

Stone,  Lee  Alexander.  An  Open  Talk 
with  Fathers  and  Mothers.  Kansas 
City:   Burton.     $1.50. 

.     The   Woman   of    the    Streets. 

Kansas  City:  Burton.  Pp.  119. 
$1.50. 

Stutzer,  Emil.  Deutsche  Sozialgeschi- 
chte  vomehmlich  d.  neuesten  Zeit 
gemein-verstandlich  dargest.  2.,  vollig 
umgearb  Aufl.  Halle:  Buchh.  d. 
Waisenhauses.     Pp.  x-l-204. 

Sumner,  William  Graham.  What  Social 
Classes  Owe  to  Each  Other.  New  edi- 
tion. New  York:  Harper.  Pp.  169. 
$1.50. 

Tahmazian,  K.  Turcs  et  Armeniens. 
Paris:  Imprimerie  H.  Turabian.  Pp. 
142. 

Talks  with  Workers  on  Wealth,  Wages 
and    Production.     London:     Pitman. 

Pp.    132.       25. 

Thompson,  Holland.  The  New  South. 
A  chronicle  of  social  and  industrial 
evolution.  ("Chronicles  of  America 
Series,"  Vol.  42.)  New  Haven:  Yale 
University  Press.  Pp.  be -f  250.  Set 
of  50  vols.  $175.00. 

Trotter,  Eleanor.  Seventeenth  Century 
Life  in  the  Country  Parish.  Cam- 
bridge: University  Press.  Pp.  xii-|- 
242.     io5.net. 

Trotter,  W.  Instincts  of  the  Herd  in 
Peace  and  War.  New  York:  Mac- 
millan.     Pp.  2(34.     $2.50. 


RECENT  LITERATURE 


123 


U.S.  Bureau  of  Immigration.  Report  of 
the  Commissioner  General  of  Immigra- 
tion. Washington:  Govt.  Ptg.  Office. 
Pp.  412. 

U.S.  House  of  Representatives.  Report 
of  the  Congressional  Joint  Commission 
on  Reclassification  of  Salaries.  Wash- 
ington:  Govt.  Ptg.  Office.     Pp.884. 

Veach,  Robert  W.  The  Meaning  of  the 
War  for  Religious  Education.  New 
York:  Revell.     Pp.  256.     $1.50. 

Villa,  Serra  (Jos6)  El  Regionalisme  en 
Espana.  Valencia:  Imp.  de  autor. 
Pp.  320. 


West,  William  Mason.  The  Story  of 
Modern  Progress;  with  a  Preliminary 
Survey  of  Earlier  Progress.  Boston: 
Allyn  &  Bacon.  Pp.  .xvi  +  7oi-(-32. 
$2.00. 

Wickware,  Francis  G.  Ed.  The  Ameri- 
can Year  Book,  1919.  New  York: 
Appleton.     Pp.  874.     $5.00. 

Yoakum,  Clarence  S.,  and  Yerkes, 
Robert  M.,  Eds.  Army  Mental  Tests 
Published  with  the  authorization  of 
the  War  Department.  New  York: 
Holt.     Pp.  xiii-H303.     $1 .  50. 


PAMPHLETS 


American  Association  for  International 
Conciliation.  Some  Bolshevist  Por- 
traits. New  York:  The  Association. 
Pp.  28. 

Andrews,  John  B.  Labor  Problems 
and  Labor  Legislation.  New  York: 
American  Association  for  Labor  Le- 
gislation.    Pp.138.     $0.10. 

Artmann,  Ferdinand.  Labour.  A  brief 
review  of  ways  and  means  for  the 
national  economic  reconstruction  of 
Central  and  Eastern  Europe,  and  the 
most  profitable  utilization  of  the  labor 
resources.  New  York:  Lemcke  & 
Buechner.     Pp.  25.     $0.75. 

Bates,  Esther  W.  A  Pageant  of  the 
League  of  Free  Nations.  Boston: 
Massachusetts  Joint  Committee  for  a 
League  of  Free  Nations.  Pp.  34. 
$0.05. 

Beck,  James  M.  Six  Fundamental  Prin- 
ciples of  the  Constitution.  New  York: 
National  Security  League.     Pp.  15. 

Bettman,  Alfred,  and  Hale,  Swinburne. 
Do  W'e  Need  More  Sedition  Laws? 
New  York:  American  Civil  Liberties 
Union,  138  W.  13th  St.     Pp.  22. 

Bloomfield  and  Bloomfield.  Typical 
Employee  Benefit  Association  Plans. 
Boston.     I  sheet. 

Brown,  Rome  G.  Americanism  vs. 
Socialism.  Minneapolis:  The  Author, 
Metropolitan  Life  Building.  Pp.  32. 
$0.06. 

.     Industries  and   the   State  under 

Socialism.  Minneapolis:  The  Author. 
Pp.  21. 

California  State  Board  of  Education. 
Documents  Relating  to  Vocational 
Education.  Sacramento:  The  Board. 
Pp.  80. 

California  State  Board  of  Health.  On 
Nursing.  Practical  information  for 
high-schoolgirls.  San  Francisco:  The 
Board.    Pp.  16. 


Captanian,  P.  Memoires  d'une  De- 
portee armenienne.  Paris:  Flinikow- 
ski.     Pp.  144. 

Carnegie  Endowment  for  International 
Peace.  Epitome  of  the  Purpose,  Plans 
and  Methods  of  the  Carnegie  Endow- 
ment for  International  Peace.  Wash- 
ington: The  Endowment.     Pp.  39. 

Cherrington,  Ernest  H.  A  New  Plan 
of  Campaign  in  the  Interest  of  Na- 
tional Prohibition.  Westerville,  Ohio: 
American  Issue  Publishers.  Pp.  22. 
$0. 10. 

Cincinnati  Better  Housing  League. 
Houses  or  Homes.  Cincinnati:  The 
League.     Pp.  32. 

Commissions  on  Training  Camp  Activi- 
ties of  the  War  and  Navy  Depart- 
ments. Standard  Forms  of  Laws  for 
Repression  of  Prostitution,  etc. 
Washington:  The  Commissions.  Pp. 
32. 

Committee  on  Philanthropic  Labor 
of  Philadelphia  Yearly  Meeting  of 
Friends.  The  Feeble-Minded  and  the 
Community.  Phildelphia:  The  Com- 
mittee.    Pp.  16. 

Community  Church.  Repression  the 
Road  to  Revolution.  New  York: 
J.  R.  Holmes,  Park  Ave.  and  34th 
St.     Pp.  22.     $0.05. 

Community  Service  in  Periodical  Litera- 
ture. New  York:  War  Camp  Com- 
munity Service.     Pp.  38. 

Correas  (Juan  Francisco)  El  Bolchev- 
ismo  en  Espana.  Madrid  (S.I.).  Pp. 
57.     $0.50. 

Dodge,  H.  L.  Kaiser  Nicotine  and  Its 
Effects  on  My  Friends.  Long  Beach, 
California:  The  Author.  Pp.  46. 
$0. 10. 

East  St.  Louis  War  Civics  Committee. 
Building  East  St.  Louis  for  Tomorrow. 
East  St.  Louis:  The  Committee.  Pp. 
28. 


124 


THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 


Edmunds,  Sterling  Edwin.  Interna- 
tional Law  and  The  Treaty  of  Peace. 
Washington:  Govt.  Ptg.  Office.  Pp. 
55.     So.io. 

Evans,  W.  A.  Prostitution  and  Venereal 
Diseases.  Chicago:  Committee  of 
Fifteen.     Pp.  4. 

Federal  Council  of  the  Churches  of 
Christ  in  America.  The  Church  and 
Social  Reconstruction.  New  York: 
The  Council.     Pp.  22. 

Frank,  Leslie  C.  and  Rhynus,  Clarence 
P.  The  Treatment  of  Sewage  from 
Single  Houses  and  Small  Communi- 
ties. Washington:  Gov.  Ptg.  Office. 
Pp.  117. 

Gallo  de  Renovales.  El  Propagandista 
Profesional.  Madrid:  Imp.  de  Gariel 
Lepez  del  Horno.     Pp.  16. 

Giannini,  Francesco.  II  Costa  della 
Vita:  Osservazioni  Diretti.  Napoli: 
Tip.  ed.  F.  Bideri.     Pp.  40,  Cent.  60. 

Great  Britian.  Medical  Research  Com- 
mittee and  Department  of  Scientific 
and  Industrial  Research.  Industrial 
Fatigue  Research  Board.  Study  of 
improved  methods  in  an  iron  foundry. 
London:  H.  M.  Stationery  Office. 
Pp.  8.     2d. 

Henry  Street  Settlement.  Visiting  Nurse 
Service:  Report  of  Director.  New 
York:  265  Henry  St.     Pp.  16. 

Hercod,  Robert.  The  Prohibition  of 
Alcohol  in  Russia.  Wasterville,  Ohio: 
American  Issue  Publishers.  Pp.  24. 
$0. 10. 

Hoffman,  Charles  W.  Social  Aspects 
of  the  Family  Court.  Cincinnati: 
The  Author.     Pp.  13. 

Immigration  Restriction  League.  Brief 
in  Favor  of  the  Numerical  Limitation 
Bill.  Boston:  11  Pemberton  Sq.    Pp.  6. 

.     Immigration  Restriction  Essential 

to  Americanization.  R.  De  C.  Ward. 
Boston:  11  Pemberton  Sq.     Pp.  7. 

Immigration.  California  Commonwealth 
Club  Transactions  Vol.  XIV,  No.  13, 
pp.  485-524.     $0.12. 

Independent  Labour  Party.  Prisons  as 
Crime  Factories.  A.  F.  Brockway. 
London:  8-9  Johnsons  Court,  Fleet  St. 
Pp.  16.     2d. 

Industrial  Commission  of  Ohio.  Union 
Scale  of  Wages  and  Hours  of  Labor  in 
Ohio  on  May  15,  1919.  Columbus: 
The  Commission.     Pp.  35. 

Johnson,  William  E.  Prohibition  in 
Kansas.  Westerville,  Ohio:  American 
Issue  Publishers.     Pp.89.     $0.20. 


.  The  South  Carolina  Liquor  Dis- 
pensary. Westerville,  Ohio:  Ameri- 
can Issue  Publishers.     Pp.  31.     $0. 10. 

Kahn,  Otto  H.  Two  Years  of  Faulty 
Taxation  and  the  Results.  New  York: 
League  for  Sound  Taxation.     Pp.  52. 

Kalaw,  Maximo  M.  A  Guide  Book  on 
the  Philippine  Question.  Washington: 
Philippine  Press.     Pp.  40. 

Lanzerotti,  Emanuele.  Pagine  di  Pro- 
paganda per  le  Cooperativo  di  Con- 
sumo.  Pisa:  La  Stampa  Nazionale. 
Pp.  78.     L.  2. 

Leary,  Daniel  B.  A  Group-Discussion 
Syllabus  of  Sociology.  Buffalo:  Uni- 
versity of  Buffalo.     Pp.43.     $1.00. 

Lewinski-Corwin,  E.  H.  The  Dispen- 
sary Situation  in  New  York  City. 
New  York:  William  Wood  &  Com- 
pany.    Pp.  21. 

Litchfield,  Paul  W.  The  Industrial 
Republic:  A  Study  in  Industrial 
Economics.  Akron:  Goodyear  Tire 
&  Rubber  Co.     Pp.  73. 

Malcolmson,  V.  A.  Rural  Housing 
and  Public  Utility  Societies.  A  few 
suggestions  which  may  contribute 
toward  the  solution  of  rural  housing 
problems.  London: Murray.    Pp.8.  6d. 

Minneapolis  Council  of  Social  Agencies. 
Positions  in  Social  Work  in  Minne- 
apolis: Report  of  a  Committee  of  the 
Minneapolis  Council  of  Social  Agencies. 
Minneapolis:  609  2d  Ave.  S.  Pp.  42. 
$0. 10. 

Mulligan,  John  T.  Americanism  or  the 
Money  Huns.  Spokane,  Washington: 
Inland  American  Printing  Co.  Pp. 
103.     $0.50. 

National  Association  for  the  Advance- 
ment of  Colored  People.  Burning  at 
Stake  in  the  United  States.  A  record 
of  the  public  burning  by  mobs  of  sbc 
men,  during  the  first  sLx  months  of 
1919,  in  the  states  of  Arkansas, 
Florida,  Georgia,  Mississippi,  and 
Texas.  New  York:  J.  R.  Shillady, 
sec,  70  5th  Ave.     Pp.  23. 

National  Board  of  Review  of  Morion 
Pictures.  Activities  of  the  Board. 
New  York:  The  Board.     Pp.  10. 

.     Objections  to  State  Censorship  of 

Motion  Pictures.  New  York:  The 
Board.     Pp.  8. 

National  City  Bank  of  New  York. 
"Movies"  Exported.  New  York:  55 
Wall  St.     I  sheet  (Alim.). 

National  Industrial  Conference  Board. 
A  Works  Council  Manual.  Boston: 
The  Board.     Pp.  v-}-32.     $1.00. 


RECENT  LITERATURE 


125 


New  York  State.  Reconstruction  Com- 
mittee. Housing  Conditions.  Pro- 
gram of  architectural  competition  for 
the  remodeling  of  a  New  York  City 
tenement  block  under  the  auspices  of 
the  joint  legislative  committee  on 
housing  and  the  reconstruction  com- 
mittee of  the  state  of  New  York, 
March  26,  1920.  New  York:  Hall  of 
Records.     Pp.  18. 

New  York  State  University.  Digest  of 
Compulsor>^  Education  and  Child 
Labor  Laws.  Albany:  The  Univer- 
sity.    Pp.  32. 

North  Carolina  University.  Bureau  of 
E.xtension.  Immigration  Restriction. 
Chapel  Hill,  N.C.     Pp.  loi. 

.    Community  Music.    P.J.  Weaver. 

Chapel  Hill,  N.  C.     Pp.  6. 

O'Hare,  K.  R.  Americanism  and  Bol- 
shevism. St.  Louis:  F.  P.  O'Hare, 
Box  1013.     Pp.46.     So.  10. 

Ohio  Board  of  Administration.  Preven- 
tion of  Racial  Deterioration  and 
Degeneracy.  C.  H.  Clark.  Colum- 
bus, Ohio.     Pp.  17. 

Oregon  Department  of  Education.  A 
Course  in  Physical  Instruction  for  the 
Schools  of  Oregon.  Salem:  The  De- 
partment.    Pp.  76. 

Parker,  William.  The  Paris  Bourse  and 
French  Finance.  ("Columbia  Uni- 
versity Studies  in  History,  Economics, 
and  Public  Law,"  Vol.  89.)  New 
York:  Longmans.     Pp.  116. 

Pedrazzi,  Orazio.  Problemi  dell'Emi- 
grazione  Italiana  agli  Stati  Uniti. 
Firenze:  Tip.  ;M.  Ricci.     Pp.  19. 

People's  Freedom  Union.  The  Truth 
About  the  Lusk  Committee.  New 
York:  Nation  Press.     Pp.32.     $0.25. 

Phelps,  Edith  M.,  Comp.  Selected 
Articles  on  Restriction  of  Immigra- 
tion. New  York:  H.W.Wilson.  Pp. 
83.     So. 50. 

Philadelphia  Housing  Association.  Pro- 
posed Zoning  Ordinance  for  Philadel- 
phia: A  Letter  to  the  Real  Estate 
Board.  Philadelphia:  John  Ihlder, 
Sec,  130  S.  15th  St.     Pp.  10. 

Pick,  Albert,  &  Co.  Employe  Better- 
ment. A  practical  setting  forth  of 
the  modem  idea  in  restrooms,  cafe- 
terias, and  industrial  clubs.  Chicago: 
208-224  W.  Randolph  St.     Pp.  28. 

Preston,  Josephine  C.  The  Wider  Use 
of  the  School  Plant.  Olympia,  Wash- 
ington: Department  of  Education. 
Pp.  80. 


Queen,  Stuart  A.  Social  Science  in 
the  Colleges.  Baltimore:  Goucher 
College.     Pp.  27. 

Rand  School  of  Social  Science.  The 
Case  of  the  Rand  School.  New  York: 
The  School.     Pp.  20. 

Root,  Elihu.  The  Constitution  of  the 
United  States.  New  York:  National 
Security  League.     Pp.  12. 

Russian  Information  Bureau  in  the 
United  States.  America's  Possible 
Share  in  the  Economic  Future  of 
Russia.  A.  J.  Sack.  New  York: 
Woolworth  Bldg.     Pp.25.     $0.25. 

Sears,  Louis  Martin.  British  Industry 
and  the  American  Embargo.  Cam- 
bridge: Harvard  University  Press. 
Pp.  25. 

Snow,  William  F.,  and  Storey,  Thomas  A. 
Experimental  Medicine  and  the  Vene- 
real Diseases.  New  York:  American 
Social  Hygiene  Association.  Pp.  18. 
$0. 10. 

Solomon,  Charles.  The  Albany  "Trial." 
New  York:  Rand  School  of  Social 
Science.     Pp.71.     $0.25. 

Southern  Association  of  College  Women. 
Proceedings  of  the  Fifteenth  Biennial 
Meeting,  Columbus,  Miss.,  April  17-19, 
1919.  Mrs.  Charles  Spencer,  Edge- 
wood,  Birmingham,  Ala.     Pp.  78. 

Southern  California  Sociological  Society. 
Community  Organization.  C.  E.  Rain- 
water. Los  Angeles:  University  of 
Southern  California.     Pp.  23.     $0.25. 

Thompson,  Henry  D.  How  to  Obtain 
Citizenship  Papers.  New  York:  Na- 
tional Security  League.     Pp.  16. 

U.S.  Army  Committee  on  Classification 
of  Personnel  in  the  Army.  Personnel 
System  of  the  United  States  Army. 
Washington. 

U.S.  Bureau  of  the  Census.  Mortality 
Statistics,  1918.  Washington.  Pp. 
92. 

U.S.  Bureau  of  Education.  Educational 
Hygiene.  By  Witlard  S.  Small. 
Washington:  Govt.  Ptg.  Office.  Pp. 
22. 

.  How  Much  Does  Higher  Educa- 
tion Cost?  E.  B.  Stevens.  Wash- 
ington.    Pp.  30. 

.     List  of   Reference   on  Teachers' 

Salaries.  Washington:  Govt.  Ptg. 
Office. 

.     List  of  References  on  the  Project 

Method  in  Education.  Washington: 
Govt.  Ptg.  Office. 

.  Public  School  System  of  Mem- 
phis, Tennessee.     Report  of  a  survey 


126 


THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 


made  under  the  direction  of  the  Com- 
missioner of  Education.  Washington. 
Pp.  1 60. 

.     Schools  and  Classes  for  the  Blind. 

Washington.     Pp.  23. 

.  Schools  and  Classes  for  Feeble- 
minded and  Subnormal  Children,  1918. 
Washington.     Pp.  37. 

.     Schools   for   the   Deaf,    191 7-18. 

Washington.     Pp.  40. 

.     State  Americanization:    the  part 

of  the  State  in  the  Education  and 
Assimilation  of  the  Immigrant.  F.  C. 
Butler.     Pp.  26. 

U.S.  Bureau  of  Efficiency  Report. 
Washington:    Govt.  Ptg.  Ofl&ce.     Pp. 

39- 

U.S.  Bureau  of  Labor  Statistics.  Acci- 
dents and  Accident  Prevention  in  Ma- 
chine Building.  W^ashington:  Govt. 
Ptg.  Office.     Pp.  123. 

U.S.  Council  of  National  Defense. 
Conditions  of  Women's  Labor  in 
Louisiana.  New  Orleans  and  Lousi- 
ana  Industrial  Survey.  New  Orleans: 
F.  W.  Wood,  626  Audubon  Building. 
Pp.  138.     $0.05. 

U.S.  Department  of  Agriculture.  Rural 
Community  Buildings  in  the  United 
States.  W.  C.  Nason  and  C.  W. 
Thompson.     Washington.     Pp.  36. 

U.S.  Department  of  Justice.  Red  Radi- 
calism as  Described  by  its  Own 
Leaders.  Exhibits  collected  by  A. 
Mitchell  Palmer,  including  various 
communist  manifestoes,  plans,  and 
purposes  of  the  proletariat  revolution, 
and  its  seditious  propaganda.  Wash- 
ington.    Pp.  83. 

U.S.  Department  of  Labor.  Seventh 
Annual  Report  of  the  Secretary. 
W^ashington:    Govt.  Ptg.  Office.     Pp. 

304- 
U.S.     Library     of     Congress.     List     of 

References   on   Chinese   Immigration. 

W^ashington.     Pp.     6.     (Typewritten, 

$0.40.)     To  be  obtained  only  through 

P.A.I.S. 
.     List    of    Recent    References    on 

Industrial  Arbitration.      Washington. 

Pp.  9. 


.     List    of    Recent    References    on 

Woman  Suffrage.  Washington.  Pp.  7. 
(Typewritten  $0.45.)  To  be  obtained 
only  through  P.A.I.S. 

U.S.  Public  Health  Service.  Constitu- 
tional Foundations  of  Federal  Health 
Functions.  By  Frank  J.  Goodnow. 
Washington:  Govt.  Ptg.  Office.  Pp. 
10.     $0.05. 

.     Do     Movies     Hurt     the     Eyes  ? 

Washington,     i  sheet  (Mim.). 

.  Health  Almanac,  1920.  Wash- 
ington.    Pp.  56. 

.     Malnutrition:    Helpful  Advice  to 

Parents.     Washington.     Pp.  12. 

U.S.     Treasury     Department.     Outline 
Suggested     for    Teaching    Thrift    in 
Elementary    Schools.     Washington: 
Govt.  Ptg.  Office.     Pp.  23. 

Vaughan,  Victor  C.  Sex  Attraction. 
St.  Louis:  Mosby.     Pp.44.     $0.50. 

Wade,  Martin  J.  Shall  We  Have  a 
School  of  Americanism  ?  Washing- 
ton:  Govt.  Ptg.  Office.     Pp.  9. 

Wallerstein,  Helen  C.  The  Functional 
Relations  of  Fifteen  Case  Working 
Agencies  as  shown  by  a  Study  of 
Forty-Two  Individual  Families  and 
the  Report  of  the  Philadelphia  Intake 
Committee.  Philadelphia :  Seybert 
Institute.     Pp.  ix  176.     So.  75. 

Weaver,  Eli  W.  The  Occupational 
Readjustment  Service  of  the  United 
Y.M.C.A.  Schools.  New  York:  Edu- 
cational Council,  Y.M.C.A.,  347  Madi- 
son Ave.     Pp.  24.     $1 .  00. 

Weller,  Charles  F.  Summer  "Stunts." 
Twenty-two  suggestions  for  joyous 
inexpensive  community-service  activi- 
ties. New  York:  Playground  and 
Recreation  Association  of  America. 
Pp.  II.     $0.20. 

West,  Henry  L.  A  Catechism  of  the 
Constitution  of  the  United  States. 
New  York:  National  Security  League. 
Pp-  15- 

Whipple,  Caroline  A.  Americanization 
in  Industry.  Albany:  University  of 
New  York.     Pp.  23. 


ARTICLES 


Ackerman,  Frederick  L.     Housing — the 

Turn    of    Affairs    in    England.     Nat. 

Mun.  Rev.  9:201-3,  Apr.  '20. 
Ardzrooni,    Leon.     The    Economics    of 

the    Social    Uplift.     Pol.    Sci.    Quar. 

35:126-35,  Mar.  '20. 


.     The  Economics  of  Social  Uplift. 

Pol.  Sci.  Quar.  35:126-35,  Mar.  '20. 
Aveling,  Francis.     The  Catholic  Church 

and  Science.     Cath.  World   in:  330- 

42,  June  '20. 


RECENT  LITERATURE 


127 


Bizzell,  W.  B.     Rural  Housing  and  the 

Tenant     Farmer.     Survey     44:26-28, 

Apr.  '20. 
Booth,  Evangeline.     Around  the  World 

with  the  Salvation  Army.    Nat.  Geog. 

Mag.  37:347-68,  Apr.  '20. 
Boutroux,    Emile.     The    Characteristics 

of  Modern   Philosophy.     Monist   30: 

267-81,  Apr.  '20. 
.     The    Psychology    of    Mysticism. 

Fortn.  Rev.  107:419-30,  Mar.  '20. 
Brown,    Harold    C.     The    Problem    of 

Philosophy.     Jour.  Phil.,  Psych.,  Sci. 

Methods  17:281-300,  May  '20. 
Bushnell,  C.  J.     The  Community  Center 

Movement  as  a  Moral  Force.     Internl. 

Jour.  Ethics  30:326-36,  Apr.  '20. 
Capitant,    Henri.     La    legislation    civile 

franfaissen    Alsace    et    en    Lorraine. 

Rev.  pol.  et  parlement.    303:226-36, 

Feb. '20. 
Carr,   Wildon.     The   Concept   of   Mind 

Energy.     Mind  113:1-10,  Jan.  '20. 
Chidell,  Fleetwood.     Imperial  Migration 

and  the  Clash  of  Races.     Quar.  Rev. 

233:359-74,  Apr.  '20. 
Clodd,  Edward.     Occltism.     Fortn.  Rev. 

107:757-68,  May  '20. 
Cole,  G.  D.  H.    A  Building  Guild  for 

Great  Britain.     New  Rep.   22:25-27, 

Mar.  3,  '20. 
Coon,     Harold     J.     Americanization — a 

Different    Viewpoint.     Amer.    Educa. 

23:401-3,  May  '20. 
Crowther,    Samuel.     Phases   of   Unrest. 

No.  Am.  Rev.  211:614-25,  May  '20. 
Dedichen,  Henrik  A.  Th.     Videnskap  og 

Erhverv.     Samtiden  11:193-209,  May 

'20. 
Dennett,  Tyler.    The  Interchurch  World 

Movement.     World's    Work    39:569- 

77,  Apr.  '20. 
Doll,   Edgar  A.     A   Study  in   Multiple 

Crime  Factors.     Jour.   Crira.  Law  & 

Criminol.  11:33-46,  May  '20. 
Dublin,  Louis  I.     Birth   Control.     Soc. 

Hyg.  6:5-16,  Jan.  '20. 
Durkheim,  E.     Introduction  a  la  morale. 

Revue  philos.  i :  79-97,  Jan.-Feb.  '20. 
Eliot,  Thomas  D.     Some  Future  Issues 

in    the   Sex   Problem.     Internl.   Jour. 

Ethics  30:296-311,  Apr.  '20. 
Fantus,    Bernard.     The    Physician    and 

Prohibition.     Jour.  Amer.  Med.  Assoc. 

74:1143-44,  Apr.  24,  '20. 
Fernald,    Guy   G.     The   Importance   of 

Character     Study     in      Criminology. 
Jour.  Crim.  Law  &  Criminol.  11:107- 

12,  May  '20. 


Forbes,  B.  C.  Is  a  Panic  Likely?  No. 
Am.  Rev.  211:511-16,  Apr.  '20. 

Freeman,  Daniel  R.  The  World  Unrest 
and  How  to  Face  It.  Standard  6 :  273- 
80,  May  '20. 

Gibbs,  Philip.  The  Failure  of  Victory. 
New.  Rep.  22:306-11,  May  5,  '20. 

Greenwood,  Arthur.  The  Nationaliza- 
tion Movement  in  Britain.  Atlantic 
125:406-16,  Mar.  '20. 

Gutman,  A.  J.  Justice  and  the  Poor. 
Standard  6:233-37,  Apr.  '20. 

Hobson,  J.  A.  The  Tragi-Comedy  of 
War  Idealism.  Standard  6:266-73, 
May,  '20. 

Hooker,  Edith  Houghton.  The  Modern 
Social  Hygiene  Program:  a  Construc- 
tive Criticism.  Survey  43:707-12, 
Mar.  '20. 

Huddleston,  Sisley.  The  Menace  of  the 
World.  Atlantic  125:585-94,  May 
'20. 

Hiiber,  Marie.  Dem  Ziele  nahe?  Die 
Neue  Generation,  Sept.  '19. 

Jacks,  L.  P.  The  International  Mind. 
Atlantic  125:299-311,  Mar.  '20. 

Kantor,  J.  R.  Intelligence  and  Mental 
Tests.  Jour.  Phil.  Psych.,  Sci. 
Methods   17:260-68,  May  '20. 

Keeling,    E.    H.     In   Russia   under   the 

Bolsheviks,  191 7.  Fortn.  Rev.  107:665- 
78,  May  '20. 

Kesler,  J.  L.  Race  Relationship  in  the 
South.  So.  Workman  49:56-64,  Feb. 
'20. 

Kitson,  H.  D.  Economic  Implications 
in  the  Psychological  Doctrine  of  In- 
terest. Jour.  Pol.  Econ.  28:332-38, 
Apr.  '20. 

Kracht,  George  B.  The  Fundamental 
Issue  between  Nationalism  and  Inter- 
nationalism. Internl.  Jour.  Ethics 
30:241-67,  Apr.  '20. 

Kulamer,  John.  Americanization:  The 
Other  Side  of  the  Case.  Atlantic 
125:416-23,  Mar.  '20. 

Lemote,  Georges.  Un  peril  pour  I'esprit 
francais — la  crise  du  livre.  Rev.  de 
deux  mond.  56:397-429,  Mar.  '20. 

Lewis,  Orlando  F.  Mobilizing  the  Com- 
munity against  Juvenile  Delinquency. 
Survey  43:765-67,  Mar.  '20. 

Low,  Sidney.  Propaganda  Films  and 
Mixed  Morals  in  the  Movies.  Fortn. 
Rev.  107:717-28,  May  '20. 
McBride,  George  McCutcheon.  Cotton 
and  Human  Affairs.  Jour.  Geog.  19: 
81-88,  Mar.  '20. 
MacCurdy,  John  T.  Psychological  As- 
pect of  the  Present  Unrest.  Survey 
43:665-68,  Mar.  '20. 


128 


THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 


Mackay,     C.     D.     Imaginative     Rural 

Recreation.      Playground      14:83-96, 

May  '20. 
Marriott,    J.    A.    R.     Nationalization  ? 

19th  Cent.     87:455-68,  Mar.  '20. 
Marshall,     J.     E.     The     Recidivist     or 

Habitual    Offender.     19th    Cent.    87: 

904-15,  May  '20. 
Martin,  Alfred  W.     The  Personal  Factor 

in  Social  Progress.     Standard  6:233- 

37,  Apr.  '20. 
Merriam,  John  Co.     The  Beginnings  of 

Human     History     Read     from     the 

Geological     Record — the     Emergence 

Man.     Sci.  Mo.  10:321-42,  Apr.  '20. 
Noyes,  Hilda  H.     The  Development  of 

Useful  Citizenship.     Jour.  Hered.  11: 

88-91,  Feb.  '20. 
Oliver,  John  R.     Emotional  States  and 

Illegal    Acts.     Jour.    Crim.    Law    & 

Criminol.  11:107-12,  May  '20. 
Phelps,     Sidney     K.      Sweated     Home 

Workers.     19th  Cent.  87 : 929-37,  May 

'20. 
Pye,    Edith    M.     Sauvons    les    enfants 

d'Europe!  La  paix  par  le  droit  30: 16- 

20,  Feb.  '20. 
Raffalovich,  Arthur.     Un  critique  anglais 

du    triate    de    Versailles.     Jour,    des 

econ.  79:30-39,  Apr.  '20. 
Rawlinson,  G.  C.     The  Present  Position 

of   Spiritualism.     Amer.   Church   Mo. 

7: 109-17,  Apr.  '20. 
Reith,    Arthur.     Galton's   Place   among 

Anthropolgists.     Eugenics    Rev.     12: 

14-28,  Apr.  '20. 
Resenow,  Curt.     Is  Lack  of  Intelligence 

the    Chief    Cause    of    Delinquency? 

Psych.  Rev.  27:147-57,  Mar.  '20. 
Ross,  Edward  A.     Commercialization — 

Increasing    or    Decreasing?     Internl. 

Jour.  Ethics  30:  284-96,  Apr.  '20. 
Sarkar,     Benoy     K.     The     Theory     of 

Property,   Law   and    Social   Order   in 

Hindu  Political  Philosophy.     Internl. 

Jour.  Ethics  30:311-26,  Apr.  '20. 
Sato,  Kenoske.     The  Problem  of  Popu- 
lation in  Japan.     Jap.  Rev.  4:184-87, 

Apr.  '20. 
Seddon,    J.    A.     A    Sane    Labour    Pro- 
gramme.    19th  Cent.  87:589-94,  Apr. 

'20. 
Sheldon,  W.  H.     Social  Tyranny.     Phil. 

Rev.  29:135-44,  Apr.  '20. 
Sims,    Newell    L.     Rural    Sociahzation. 

Pol.  Sci.  Quar.  35:54-77,  Mar.  '20. 


Spinner,  Dr.  J.  H.  Verbrecherische 
Gynacologie.  Die  Neue  Generation, 
Oct.  '19. 

Starcke,  C.  N.  Mekanisme  og  Vitalisme. 
Tilskueren  16:300-314,  Apr.  '20. 

Stead,  Herbert  F.  Religion  in  the 
Labour  Movement.  London  Quar. 
Rev.  38:175-86,  Apr.  '20. 

Stocker,  Dr.  Helene.  Revolution  u. 
Gewaltlosigkeit.  Die  Neue  Genera- 
tion, Sept.  '19. 

Stone,  R.  G.  A  Co-operative  Housing 
Plan.     Standard  6:266-73,  May   '20. 

Swenson,  David  F.  The  Logical  Im- 
plicates of  the  Community.  Jour. 
Phil.,  Psych.,  Sci.  Methods  17:253-60, 
May  '20. 

Tentative  Report  of  the  Committee  of 
the  American  Sociological  Society  on 
the  Teaching  of  Sociology  in  the  Grade 
and  High  Schools  of  America.  Sch. 
Rev.  28:255-62,  Apr.  '20. 

Thorngate,  Ella.  Americanization  in 
Omaha.  Eng.  Jour.  9:123-28,  Mar. 
'20. 

Tinker,  F.  Stanley.  The  Municipal 
Workshop:  A  Scheme  for  the  Post- 
Sanatorium  Employment  of  the  Con- 
sumptive Ex-Soldier.  Lancet  198: 
4S7~58,  Feb.  21,  '20. 

Townsend,  H.  G.  The  Church  and 
Society.  Phil.  Rev.  29:144-53,  Apr. 
'20. 

Turner,  J.  E.  The  Conservation  of 
Values  in  the  Universe.  Monist  30: 
203-20,  Apr.  '20. 

Walcott,  Gregory  D.  The  Intelligence 
of  Chinese  Students.  Sch.  and  Society 
11:474-80,  Apr.  '20. 

Wallis,  W.  D.  Motive  and  Caprice  in 
Anthropology  and  History.  Jour. 
Phil.,  Psych.,  Sci.  Methods  17:197- 
205,  May  '20. 

Wile,  Ira  S.  Sociological  Aspects  of 
Housing.  Amer.  Jour.  Pub.  Health, 
10:327-31,  Apr.  '20. 

Williams,  J.  Harold.  Individual  Case 
History  Outline.  Jour.  Delinq.  5:71- 
82,  May  '20. 

Work,  Monroe  N.  Inter-Racial  Co- 
operation. So.  Workman  49:157-60, 
Apr.  '20. 

Yarros,  Victor  S.  Bolshevism:  Its 
Rise,  Decline,  and — Fall?  Internl. 
Jour.  Ethics,  30:267-84,  Apr.  '20. 

Zimand,  S.  The  Walkout  on  the  Rail- 
roads. New  Rep.  22:272-75,  Apr. 
28,  '20. 


THE  AMERICAN 

JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 


Volume  XXVI  SEPTEMBER     I92O  Number  2 


REFLECTIONS  UPON  THE  SOCIOLOGY  OF 
HERBERT  SPENCERS 


CHARLES  H.  COOLEY 

University  of  Michigan 


I  imagine  that  nearly  all  of  us  who  took  up  sociology  between 
1870,  say,  and  1890  did  so  at  the  instigation  of  Spencer.  While 
he  did  not  invent  the  word  (though  most  of  us  had  never  heard  it 
before),  much  less  the  idea,  he  gave  new  life  to  both,  and  seemed  to 
show  us  an  open  road  into  those  countries  which  as  yet  we  had 
only  vaguely  yearned  to  explore.  His  book,  The  Study  of  Sociology, 
perhaps  the  most  readable  of  all  his  works,  had  a  large  sale  and 
probably  did  more  to  arouse  interest  in  the  subject  than  any  other 
publication  before  or  since.  Whatever  we  may  have  occasion  to 
charge  against  him,  let  us  set  down  at  once  a  large  credit  for  effec- 
tive propagation. 

It  is  certain  that  nearly  all  of  us  fell  away  from  him  sooner  or 
later  and  more  or  less  completely.  My  own  defection,  I  believe, 
was  one  of  the  earliest  and  most  complete;  and  since  the  recoil 
has  gone  farther  with  me  than  with  most  others,  it  is  not  unlikely 
that  I  now  fail  to  do  him  justice.     However,  my  views,  such  as 

'  A  paper  read  before  the  Research  Club  of  the  University  of  Michigan  at  a  meeting 
held  to  commemorate  the  centenary  of  Spencer's  birth.  On  the  same  occasion 
Alfred  H.  Lloyd  read  a  paper  on  Spencer's  philosophy,  which  appears  in  the  Scientific 
Monthly  for  June,  1920. 

129 


I30  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

they  are,  have  at  least  had  ample  time  to  mature,  and  I  offer  them 
for  what  they  may  be  worth. 

The  ancestors  of  Herbert  Spencer  were  plain  people  of  the 
Enghsh  middle  class,  most  of  them  dissenters  from  the  Established 
Church  and  somewhat  radical  in  politics.  His  father,  however, 
was  a  man  of  marked  ability,  a  teacher  noted  for  ingenious  ways  of 
evoking  interest,  and  the  author  of  a  work  on  Inventional  Geometry, 
in  which  this  subject  was  taught  by  a  method  of  experiment  and 
discovery.  An  uncle,  Thomas  Spencer,  took  a  degree  at  Cambridge 
and  became  somewhat  distinguished  in  the  church,  rather  as  an 
agitator  of  reforms,  however,  than  in  orthodox  activities.  He 
was  frequently  at  odds  with  his  colleagues  and  finally  went  so  far 
as  to  advocate  the  separation  of  church  and  state.  The  innovating 
spirit  observed  in  his  father  and  uncle  was  justly  regarded  b}' 
Spencer  as  a  precious  part  of  his  own  heredity.  His  mother  was 
amiable  and  devoted  but  apparently  of  no  marked  individuality, 
rather  harshly  treated  by  her  husband,  and  sometimes  referred 
to  by  her  son  as  an  example  of  the  ill  effects  of  too  much  self- 
abnegation. 

Herbert  received  very  little  systematic  instruction.  This  seems 
to  have  been  due  partly  to  his  father's  views,  exalting  self -activity 
and  disinclined  to  force  natural  inclinations,  and  partly  to  the  boy's 
delicate  health.  His  mind  was  active,  but  chiefly  upon  inquiries 
of  his  own — into  mechanics,  natural  history,  or  ethics — and  even 
then  he  showed  signs  of  that  incapacity  for  sustained  reading 
which  was  pathological  in  his  mature  years.  He  began  Latin 
and  Greek,  but  apparently  did  not  get  enough  to  be  of  any  use, 
and  never  studied  English  grammar  at  all.  Indeed,  apart  from  a 
limited  ability  to  read  French,  acquired  later,  Spencer  seems  never 
to  have  had  the  use  of  any  foreign  or  ancient  language.  Nor  does  it 
appear  that  he  ever  studied  history,  literature,  or  philosophy, 
except  as  he  was  incited  to  occasional  reading  in  these  subjects 
by  the  requirements  of  his  own  work. 

At  the  age  of  fourteen  his  uncle,  with  whom  he  was  then  living, 
describes  him  as  having  superior  talents  but  lacking  diligence 
and  modesty,'  this  last  judgment  referring  to  the  irrepressible  con- 

^  Autobiography,  I,  iig. 


THE  SOCIOLOGY  OF  HERBERT  SPENCER  131 

tentiousness  for  which  he  was  at  all  ages  remarkable.  We  may 
think  of  him,  then,  as  a  bright,  argumentative  boy,  rather  dis- 
agreeably self-confident,  well  supplied  with  ideas,  many  of  them 
original,  regarding  mathematics,  natural  science,  and  the  conduct 
of  life,  but  notably  deficient  in  the  foundations  of  traditional 
culture. 

At  seventeen  Spencer  got  a  job  as  a  civil  engineer  and  was 
engaged  in  this  work  four  years,  showing  an  aptitude  for  it  which 
might  apparently  have  led  to  distinguished  success,  had  he  not 
preferred  to  give  it  up  and  try  for  something  more  befitting  the 
large  faculties  of  which  he  was  conscious. 

The  period  from  twenty-one  to  twenty-eight  was  spent  in 
desultory  study  and  brief  experiments  at  making  a  living.  He 
tried  writing,  editing,  and  inventing,  with  indifferent  pecuniary 
success,  and  was  employed  more  profitably  upon  a  parUamentary 
investigation  of  certain  railways.  At  one  time  he  took  an  active 
part,  on  the  radical  side,  in  a  political  campaign.  At  twenty- 
eight  he  got  work  as  sub-editor  of  the  London  Economist.  The 
duties  were  light,  leaving  him  ample  time  for  other  pursuits,  and 
he  was  thus  enabled  to  develop  his  ideas,  increase  his  acquaintance, 
practice  writing,  and  pass  gradually  into  that  career  of  philosophic 
thought  and  publication  which  occupied  the  remainder  of  his  life. 

The  character  of  Spencer's  sociology  is  so  interwoven  with  his 
personal  traits  that  I  find  that  my  best  approach  to  it  will  be 
through  an  inquiry  as  to  how  far  his  nature  and  training  fitted  him 
to  deal  with  this  subject.  That  he  possessed  very  great  powers  is 
too  obvious  to  dwell  upon ;  I  shall  therefore  occupy  myself  chiefly 
with  indicating  certain  limitations. 

I  thinlv,  then,  that  Spencer  was  not  by  nature  especially  suited 
to  be  an  observer  of  mankind  and  of  society.  It  seems  clear, 
from,  his  own  account  of  himself  in  his  Autobiography  as  well  as 
from  other  witnesses,  that  he  was  rather  deficient  in  those  sympa- 
thetic qualities  which  are,  after  all,  the  only  direct  source  of  our 
knowledge  of  other  people.  A  lack  of  tact,  which  he  deplored 
but  did  not  overcome,  was  accentuated  by  a  somewhat  censorious 
and  unconciliatory  way  of  expressing  himself,  both  of  which  traits 


132  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

he  ascribes  to  heredity.  ''The  Spencers  of  the  preceding  genera- 
tion," he  says,  "were  all  characterized  by  lack  of  reticence.'"  On 
the  other  side,  "my  mother  was  distinguished  by  extreme  simple- 
mindedness;  so  much  so  that,  unlike  women  in  general,  she  was 
without  the  thought  of  policy  in  her  dealings  with  other  persons. 
In  me  these  traits  were  united."^  "The  tendency  to  fault-finding," 
he  adds,  "is  dominant — disagreeably  dominant."^  He  thought  this 
was  probably  "a  chief  factor  in  the  continuance  of  my  celibate  life. 
Readiness  to  see  inferiorities  rather  than  superiorities  must  have 
impeded  the  finding  of  one  who  attracted  me  in  adequate  degree."^ 
It  would  be  ungenerous  and  indeed  injudicial  to  convict  one  of  a 
defect  of  this  delicate  nature  solely  from  his  own  confession;  the 
confession  is  ingratiating  and  in  some  measure  contradicts  itself. 
It  accords,  however,  with  the  impression  one  gets  not  only  from 
the  Autobiography  but  from  the  authorized  life  by  Duncan  and 
from  contemporary  anecdotes,  which  is  that  of  a  nature  high- 
minded  indeed  and  in  its  way  fine-minded,  but  unsympathetic  and 
of  a  schoolmasterish  sort  of  egotism,  prone  to  read  other  people 
lectures  rather  than  to  hear  what  they  have  to  say.  This  native 
lack  of  touch  was  increased  by  his  preoccupation  with  speculative 
ideas.  "I  am  a  bad  observer  of  humanity  in  the  concrete,"  he  says, 
"being  too  much  given  to  wandering  off  into  the  abstract."''  He 
was,  in  short,  quite  the  opposite  in  these  regards  of  his  compatriot 
Lord  Roberts,  of  whom  it  is  said : 

He  had  ....  an  immense  power  of  sympathetic  absorption  in  the 
affairs  of  others.  He  spoke  to  you  not  only  with  his  whole  attention  for  the 
time  being,  he  went  further  than  that:  he  gave  you  the  impression  that  this 
was  the  supreme  moment  of  the  day  for  which  he  had  been  wailing.  He 
entered  so  fully,  so  sympathetically,  into  my  interests,  that  I  was  tempted  to 
expand  and  to  confide  in  him  even  private  affairs,  in  no  way  connected  with 
the  matter  ....  that  I  had  come  about  .s 

Spencer's  disregard  of  personality  is  curiously  illustrated  by 
his  essay  on  "  The  Philosophy  of  Style."  In  this  he  does  not  appear 
to  be  interested  in  the  fact — if  indeed  he  perceives  it  at  all — that 

'  Autobiography,  II,  329.  3 Ibid.,  p.  520. 

'  Ibid.,  p.  512.  ■»  Ibid.,  p.  461. 

5  Mortimer  Menpes,  Lord  Roberts,  p.  7. 


THE  SOCIOLOGY  OF  HERBERT  SPENCER  133 

at  least  half  of  style  is  the  communication  of  personal  attitudes, 
and  this  by  means  so  subtle  as  to  defy  the  rather  mechanical 
analysis  which  he  employs.  The  whole  study,  therefore,  lacks 
penetration  and,  I  should  suppose,  would  be  a  most  unsafe  guide 
to  practice. 

This  lack  of  insight  into  other  minds,  whether  in  face-to-face 
intercourse  or  through  works  of  literature  and  art,  was  nothing 
less  than  a  lack  of  the  perceptions  indispensable  to  any  direct 
study  of  social  phenomena.     It  was  a  fatal  handicap. 

Of  the  same  piece  with  his  defect  of  sympathy  is  Spencer's 
lack  of  literary  and  historical  culture,  which,  for  an  intellectual 
man  and  a  writer,  was  remarkable.  Not  only  did  he  have  no  dis- 
cipline of  this  sort,  to  speak  of,  in  his  youth,  but  in  his  later  years 
his  nervous  trouble  appears  to  have  prohibited  any  sustained 
reading  not  indispensable  to  his  work.  His  power  of  attention, 
limited  to  some  two  hours  a  day,  was  infringed  not  only  by  serious 
application  but  by  a  novel  or  a  newspaper  or  even  by  hearing  others 
read.  For  these  reasons,  quite  sufficient  and  by  no  means  dis- 
creditable to  him,  he  had,  apparently,  only  a  perfunctory  knowledge 
of  English  literature  and  practically  none  of  any  other.  In  middle 
life  he  organized  for  his  works  on  sociology  much  historical  material 
compiled  by  assistants,  but  by  that  time  the  bent  of  his  mind  was 
fixed;  and,  moreover,  he  approached  this  material  with  a  set  pur- 
pose and  not  in  the  disinterested  attitude  propitious  to  culture. 
Canon  Barnett,  with  whom  he  made  the  Nile  trip  in  1879,  wrote 
in  a  letter,  "He  is  strangely  ignorant  of  history  and  Hterature; 
so  I  should  be  shy  of  taking  any  of  his  facts,"  adding,  "He  is  not 
interesting.  There  are  few  matters  which  he  knows  enough  of,  or 
is  interested  enough  in,  to  discuss."*  Whatever  his  knowledge, 
Spencer  certainly  had  little  or  nothing  of  the  historical  sentiment, 
no  brooding  sympathy  with  the  movements  of  the  human  spirit  in 
the  past.  Anything  of  this  sort  was  quite  alien  to  his  formal  and 
positive  mode  of  thought. 

He  not  only  lacked  culture,  in  the  usual  meaning,  but  he  set  a 
low  value  on  it,  he  almost  scorned  it.  "Had  Greece  and  Rome 
never  existed,"  he  remarks,  "human  life  and  the  right  conduct  of 

'  Canon  Barneit,  by  his  wife,  I,  230-31. 


134  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

it  would  have  been  in  their  essentials  exactly  what  they  now 
are:  survival  or  death,  health  or  disease,  prosperity  or  adversity, 
happiness  or  miser}%  would  have  been  just  in  the  same  ways  deter- 
mined by  the  adjustment  or  non-adjustment  of  actions  to  require- 
ments."^ 

Is  this  true?  I  think  not;  Greece  and  Rome  are  of  our  life- 
blood.  It  seems  to  me,  indeed,  that  such  expressions  reveal  a 
defect  which  is  more  detrimental  to  truth  than  ignorance,  namely, 
contempt  for  essential  knowledge,  A  man  may  lack  a  certain  kind 
of  culture,  as  Keats  lacked  Greek,  and  yet  have  a  sympathy  and 
reverence  which  brings  him  close  to  it;  but  Spencer  was  not  a  man 
of  this  sort.  His  was  not  that  lowly  mind  which  enters  easily  all 
the  doors  of  knowledge.  Humility  is  hardly  to  be  found  in  him, 
and  his  attitude  toward  such  matters  as  history,  Hterature,  phi- 
losophy, and  the  fine  arts  is  that  of  one  who  does  not  need  to 
pore  over  the  records  of  the  past,  but  is  aheady  competent,  by 
virtue  of  natural  gifts  and  a  philosophy  of  his  own  device,  to  instruct 
the  world  on  these  questions.  He  displays,  in  short,  a  cocksure- 
ness  that  does  nothing  to  reconcile  us  to  his  insufficiency. 

It  is  no  crime  in  a  man  not  to  care  for  the  loveliness  of  St. 
Mark's  church  at  Venice — we  all  have  our  bhnd  spots.  But  what 
shall  we  say  of  one  who,  with  no  title  to  competence,  assumes  to 
set  aside  the  judgment  of  time  and  to  pronounce,  after  a  page  of 
rather  fatuous  comment,  that  it  is  "not  precious  aesthetically 
considered"  ?^  Are  not  such  judgments  bold  with  the  boldness  of 
the  man  who  declares  that  the  earth  is  flat,  because  it  looks  so  to 
him?  And  this  is  typical  of  Spencer's  attitude  not  only  toward 
art  but  toward  many  other  things  of  which  he  knew  equally  Httle. 
It  argues,  I  think,  a  certain  incomprehension  of  the  nature  of 
phenomena  of  this  sort,  and  of  the  conditions  necessarj^  to  their 
appreciation.  Works  of  literature  and  the  various  arts  have  their 
being  in  a  traditional  organism  of  thought  and  expression,  and 
there  is  no  hope  of  participating  fully  in  their  spirit  except  as  one 
earns  a  membership  in  that  organism.  This  is  done  by  s>aTipathy, 
by  open-mindedness,  and  by  reverent  study  of  works  which  promise 
to  repay  such  study. 

'  Autobiography,  II,  43.  '  Ibid.,  pp.  407-8. 


THE  SOCIOLOGY  OF  HERBERT  SPENCER  135 

I  do  not  mean  that  Spencer  had  a  mind  wholly  insensible  to 
the  fine  arts.  He  enjoyed  and  even  practiced  music,  for  example, 
had  considerable  skill  in  drawing,  and  liked  to  read  aloud  the  poetry 
of  Shelley.  I  mean  that  he  seems  to  have  no  feeling  for  the  tra- 
ditional, social,  and  personal  elements  that  enter  so  largely  into 
art  and  literature  and  therefore  no  sense  of  the  need  of  culture 
and  sympathy  in  passing  judgment  upon  them. 

If  our  philosopher's  defects  of  nature  and  education  were  such 
as  I  have  indicated,  it  will  not  be  surprising  if  we  find  that  he  lacked 
direct  and  authentic  perception  of  the  structure  and  movement  of 
human  life,  and  that  he  conceived  these  phenomena  almost  wholly 
by  analogy.  The  organic  wholes  of  the  social  order  are  mental 
facts  of  much  the  same  nature  as  personality,  and  much  the  same 
kind  of  sympathetic  imagination  is  needed  to  grasp  them.  This 
Spencer  did  not  have,  and  accordingly  his  conceptions,  however 
bold  and  ingenious,  are,  in  my  opinion,  not  properly  sociological 
at  all. 

If  there  is  in  Spencer  one  dominant  trait,  engendering  both 
his  qualities  and  his  defects,  it  is  without  doubt  the  energy  of  his 
speculative  impulse.  This  was  not  only  immensely  strong  and 
bold  but  was  combined  in  a  signal  degree  with  the  need  to  think 
exhaustively  and  in  concrete  terms.  It  thus  impelled  him  not  only 
to  conceive  a  vast  scheme  of  cosmic  principles  but  to  develop 
these  with  apparent  consistency  in  every  department  of  nature, 
fortifying  each  detail  by  clear  statement  and  a  convincing  array  of 
facts.  This  chiefly  gave  him  his  great  vogue  with  inquiring 
young  men;  he  gratified  two  needs  of  every  sound  mind:  to 
think  largely  and  to  think  in  definitely  conceivable  forms.  Never 
vague  or  merely  abstract,  he  saw  in  detail  what  he  saw  at  all. 
No  doubt,  also,  his  great  pretensions  and  his  rejection  of  tradi- 
tional knowledge  contributed  to  his  acceptation  by  confirming  the 
inquiring  young  man  in  his  own  self-conceit. 

So  far  as  I  am  able  to  judge,  Spencer  had  great  gifts  as  an 
observer  of  inanimate  nature,  and  only  his  exorbitant  speculative 
trend  prevented  his  achieving  more  important  results  than  he  did. 
His  questioning  of  accepted  ideas,  his  persistency,  his  ingenuity 
and  manual  skill  (much  greater  than  that  of  Darwin)  were  all 


136  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

valuable  traits.  What  he  mainly  lacked  as  a  natural  scientist,  I 
imagine,  was  again  humility.  He  was  inclined  to  domineer  over 
his  facts,  instead  of  listening  with  open  mind  to  what  they  had 
to  say. 

Spencer  claimed  that  he  had  "equal  proclivities  towards  analysis 
and  synthesis."  This  is  true,  in  the  sense  that  he  had  an  equal 
need  to  see  his  conceptions  in  large  and  in  detail,  but  I  think  that 
both  his  analysis  and  his  synthesis  were  a  priori,  that  in  both  the 
disposition  to  work  out  preconceived  ideas  is  far  more  active  than 
disinterested  curiosity.  Indeed,  when  he  once  gets  to  work,  espe- 
cially upon  social  material,  the  latter  is  hardly  discernible.  He 
himself  regrets  that  he  was  apt  "to  be  enslaved  by  a  plan  once 
formed"^  and  to  slur  over  difficulties.^ 

Here,  of  course,  is  his  most  obvious  inferiority  to  Darwin. 
While  he  may  have  surveyed  almost  as  many  facts,  he  did  so  in 
a  wholly  different  spirit.  Darwin's  great  gift,  I  suppose,  was  the 
combination  of  a  humble  and  tireless  curiosity  with  a  generalizing 
power  vast,  indeed,  but  by  no  means  domineering.  He  collected 
facts  and  drew  a  theory  from  them,  while  Spencer  spun  a  theory 
from  any  material  he  happened  to  have  and  collected  facts  to 
illustrate  it.  Hence,  in  spite  of  his  ingenuity,  he  was  far  less 
original,  less  solid,  less  truly  the  man  of  science  than  his  contempo- 
rary. The  inquiring  young  man  will  not  long  remain  content  with 
Spencer  if  he  has  any  gift  for  direct  observation.  He  will  presently 
discover  that  the  light  which  seems  so  clear  is  not  daylight  but 
the  artificial  illumination  of  a  theory;  that  the  array  of  facts  are 
but  illustrations  of  the  theory;  and  that  the  assertions  do  not 
stand  the  test  of  real  life. 

The  conception  of  organic  process  which  Spencer  gave  most  of 
his  life  to  elaborating  remains  meager.  It  grows  longer  and  longer 
but  never  fills  out  with  real  flesh  and  blood.  Where  will  you  find 
in  him  any  of  those  illuminating  flashes  that  show  a  conception 
vividly  and  as  a  whole  ?  It  is  all  detail  and  formula,  never  a 
revelation. 

Nothing  could  have  been  more  odious  to  him  than  the  sug- 
gestion that  his  work  belonged,  psychologically,  in  a  class  with  that 

'  Autobiography,  II,  215.  '  Ibid.,  I,  452. 


TEE  SOCIOLOGY  OF  HERBERT  SPENCER  137 

of  the  systematizers  of  theology — Thomas  Aquinas,  perhaps,  or 
John  Calvin — rather  than  with  the  true  men  of  science.  But  would 
there  not  be  some  truth  in  such  a  suggestion  ? 

Turning  now  from  Spencer's  talent  to  his  works,  there  is  per- 
haps nothing  more  fundamental  for  our  purpose  than  his  social 
psychology-.  This  is  found  in  those  four  chapters  of  his  Principles 
of  Psychology  which  treat  of  "Sociality  and  S)rmpathy,"  "Egoistic 
Sentiments,"  "Ego-altruistic  Sentiments,"  and  "Altruistic  Senti- 
ments." The  Principles  of  Psychology  was  first  published  when 
Spencer  was  thirty-five,  costing  him  such  labor  that  he  ascribes 
to  it  in  great  part  the  impaired  health  from  which  he  suffered 
thereafter.  It  did  not  at  that  time,  however,  include  any  social 
psycholog}%  but  was  concerned  wholly  with  the  development  of  the 
individual  mind.  Apparently  he  did  not  perceive  the  need  of  a 
social  psychology  at  all  until  he  began  some  years  later  to  work 
out  his  sociology.  Then,  having,  as  he  says,  "  to  follow  out  Evolu- 
tion under  those  higher  forms  which  societies  present,"  he  was  led 
to  discuss  "the  special  psychology  of  Man  considered  as  the  unit 
of  which  societies  are  composed."^  The  idea  of  treating  the 
subject  was,  then,  an  afterthought  conceived  rather  late  in  life 
and  carried  out  in  a  supplementary  part  of  his  Psychology  called 
"Corollaries,"  published  in  the  second  edition  of  that  work,  which 
appeared  when  the  author  was  fifty-two  years  old.  It  is  not 
strange  that  his  discussion  is  somewhat  perfunctory  and  involves  no 
change  from  his  previous  modes  of  thought. 

Speaking  summarily,  I  may  say  that  he  explains  the  social  senti- 
ments by  their  utility,  by  conscious  and  unconscious  adaptation 
to  the  conditions  of  life,  and  by  the  cumulative  inheritance  of 
acquired  mental  traits.  Natural  selection  is  included  but  not 
much  emphasized;  it  is  hardly  essential  to  the  argument.  We 
are  shown  that  the  individual  is  s>Tnpathetic  because  sympathy 
has  been  useful  and  habitual  to  the  race  in  the  past.  Transmitted 
by  heredity  and  increased  by  use  it  is  enabled,  with  the  aid  of  the 
representative  powers  of  the  mind,  to  unite  with  instinct  in  forming 
social  sentiments.     These  may  be  ego-altruistic  (so  called  because 

'  Principles  of  Psychology,  II,  508. 


138  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

they  involve  both  a  sense  of  one's  self  and  a  reference  to  the  state  of 
mind  of  others,  like  the  love  of  approbation);  or  they  may  be 
wholly  altruistic,  like  a  generosity  which  seeks  no  recognition,  or 
like  a  disinterested  sense  of  justice.  All  sentiments,  however,  are 
primarily  egoistic,  according  to  Spencer,  and  become  altruistic 
when  referred  to  others.  ''The  altruistic  feelings,"  he  says,  "are 
all  sympathetic  excitements  of  egoistic  feelings." 

Let  me  first  point  out  that  this  phraseology  of  egoism  and 
altruism  marks  an  individualistic  conception ;  that  is,  it  makes  the 
whole  matter  one  of  the  interplay  of  separate  units  rather  than 
of  collective  growth.  A  sentiment  grows  up  in  one  person  and  may 
be  referred  to  another  by  sympathy :  there  is  no  idea  of  a  continuing 
social  life,  having  an  organization  and  history  of  its  own,  in  which 
sentiments  are  gradually  developed,  and  from  which  they  are  derived 
by  the  individual.  It  cannot  be  said  that  Spencer's  treatment 
excludes  such  an  idea,  but  his  failure  to  develop  it,  here  or  else- 
where, shows  that  it  had  no  considerable  part  in  his  thought. 
And  yet  it  is  the  central  conception  of  any  real  sociology,  since 
any  science  of  life  must  have  a  distinct  life-process  with  which  it  is 
concerned. 

A  sociological  view,  I  think,  would  be  that  the  higher  senti- 
ments are  in  general  neither  egoistic  nor  altruistic  as  regards  their 
source,  but  just  social,  derived,  that  is,  from  the  stream  of  an 
organic  common  life.  It  is,  for  example,  an  incorrect  view  of 
the  sense  of  justice  to  say  that  we  first  develop  it  regarding  ourselves 
and  then  transfer  it  by  sympathy  to  others.  Our  sentiments  of 
justice  have  been  worked  out  by  society'  in  the  past  and  come  to  us 
primarily  from  the  social  environment  and  tradition,  their  refer- 
ence to  myself  or  to  you  being  secondary.  We  acquire  them  just  as 
we  do  the  meaning  of  the  word  "justice,"  that  is,  we  find  the  idea 
or  sentiment  already  organized  for  us  in  the  current  of  history, 
and  assimilate  it  by  the  aid  of  conversation  and  literature,  although 
it  must  get  flesh  and  blood,  as  it  were,  from  our  own  experience. 
The  social  tradition  supplies  the  pattern  which  the  individual 
fills  out  and  colors  in  a  more  or  less  original  manner.  The  proof  is 
the  established  fact  that  the  customs  or  mores  of  the  group  can 
make  almost  anything  appear  to  the  individual  as  just  or  unjust. 


THE  SOCIOLOGY  OF  HERBERT  SPENCER  139 

Spencer's  view  is  scarcely  different  from  that  of  one  who  should 
maintain  that  the  idea  of  justice  is  created  anew  in  each  generation 
by  heredity  and  sympathy,  failing  to  see  that  it  also  represents 
the  accumulated  wisdom  of  the  past  transmitted  through  language. 
His  process  is  not  social  but  biological  and  individual. 

The  essential  differences  between  present  social  psychology,  as  I 
understand  it,  and  the  conception  of  Spencer  may  be  otherwise 
stated  as  follows:  We  now  believe  that  the  individual  is  born  with 
decisive  but  quite  rudimentary  capacities  and  tendencies,  owing 
Uttle  or  nothing  to  direct  inheritance  of  the  effects  of  use.  For 
the  development  of  these  into  a  human  personahty  he  is  wholly 
dependent  upon  a  social  environment  which  comes  down  from  the 
past  through  an  organic  social  process.  This  social  process  cannot 
be  inferred  from  individual  psychology,  much  less  from  heredity; 
it  must  be  studied  directly  and  is  the  principal  subject  of  sociology.^ 
It  absorbs  individuals  into  its  life,  conforming  them  to  its  require- 
ments and  at  the  same  time  developing  their  individuality.  There 
is  no  general  opposition  between  the  individual  and  the  social  whole ; 
they  are  complementary  and  work  together  to  carry  on  the  his- 
torical organism.  Neither  is  there  any  general  opposition  between 
social  environment  and  heredity;  they  also  are  complementary, 
working  together  to  carry  on  a  human  whole  which  is  social  in 
one  aspect  and  biological  in  another.  Spencer,  on  the  other  hand, 
has  little  perception  of  a  social  organism  continuous  with  the  past. 
His  organism,  so  far  as  he  has  one,  is  biological  in  its  process,  trans- 
mitted to  the  individual  by  the  direct  inheritance  of  mental  states 
created  by  use.  No  doubt,  as  he  sees  the  matter,  the  individuals 
thus  generated  unite  into  a  differentiated  and  co-ordinated  society, 
but  this  is  conceived  almost  as  if  it  were  continually  reproduced 
from  biological  roots,  like  the  annual  fohage  of  a  perennial  herb. 
Its  historical  continuity,  momentum,  and  abundance  of  content, 
its  power  to  mold  individuals  as  well  as  to  be  molded  by  them,  is  not 
clearly  seen.     And  this  is  true  of  all  Spencer's  sociolog>\     It  is 

'  Much  that  has  recently  been  published  regarding  the  social  working  of  instinct 
shows  little  improvement  upon  Spencer  in  this  regard.  I  mean  that  it  proceeds  from 
an  analysis  of  instinct  directly  to  social  conclusions  (sometimes  of  the  most  sweep- 
ing character),  without  the  least  direct  study  of  the  social  process.  Even  the  instinct 
studied  is  usually  subhuman,  that  of  man  being  inferred  from  analogy. 


I40  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

biological-individualistic,  the  biology  being  of  a  type  involving 
use-inheritance,  and  the  individualism  of  a  mechanical  sort  quite 
inadequate  to  embrace  human  personality. 

It  is  a  common  impression  that  Spencer  emphasized  the  social 
order  at  the  expense  of  the  individual  person.  I  would  rather 
say  that  he  had  little  conception  either  of  a  social  order,  properly 
speaking,  or  of  persons  as  members  of  that  order,  and  consequently 
never  seriously  confronted  the  problem  of  their  relation.  Such 
questions,  for  example,  as  that  of  the  precise  nature  and  value  of 
leadership  are  not  worked  out  by  him,  because  they  belong  in  that 
region  of  true,  as  distinguished  from  analogical,  sociology'  which 
he  scarcely  entered.^ 

At  least  one  critic,  Mr.  J.  M.  Robertson ,  in  his  Modern  Human- 
ists, has  pointed  out  that  Spencer's  thought  about  society  shows  two 
distinct  currents,  separate  in  their  origin  and  appearing  to  other 
minds  irreconcilable.  One  apparently  came  from  the  intellectual 
atmosphere  surrounding  his  youth  and  early  manhood,  before  he 
became  in  any  sense  an  evolutionist.  It  is  essentially  static, 
individualistic,  hedonistic;  and  is  otherwise  remarkable  for  the 
doctrinaire  thoroughness  with  which  he  worked  it  out  and  applied 
it  to  questions  of  the  day,  often,  it  would  seem,  in  defiance  of 
sound  practical  judgment.  The  other  current  is  evolutionary, 
beginning  apparently  when  he  was  about  twenty  in  the  reading  of 
Lyell's  Geology  (where  he  found  an  account  of  the  views  of 
Lamarck),  gradually  gaining  upon  him  as  he  grew  older,  greatly 
increased  and  modified  by  the  pubhcation  of  the  Origin  of 
Species,  when  he  was  about  forty,  but  never  so  possessing  his  mind 
as  to  solve  his  thought  into  one  consistent  whole.  He  remained 
to  the  end  partly  of  the  old  time  and  partly  of  the  new,  asserting 
both  tendencies  with  equal  conviction,  unaware  of  any  incom- 
patibility, and  never  becoming  an  evolutionist  in  the  sense  that 
most  men  are  who  have  grown  up  in  Darwinism. 

Among  the  works  in  which  the  first  influence  is  ascendent  are 
Social  Statics — his  first  book,  published  when  he  was  thirty — 
the  Principles  of  Ethics  and  Man  versus  the  State,  the  two  latter 

'  Compare  the  remarks  on  the  relation  of  the  individual  to  society  in  the  Auto- 
biography, II,  543. 


THE  SOCIOLOGY  OF  HERBERT  SPENCER  141 

appearing  late  in  his  life.  In  these  his  leading  conceptions  are  pre- 
Darwinian,  in  the  sense  that  they  have  proved  incapable  of  survival 
after  Darwinism  has  had  time  to  develop  its  social  implications. 
The  point  of  view  is  individuaHstic  and  the  practical  policy  one  of 
extreme  laissez  faire,  as  opposed  to  social  control.  The  process  is 
conceived  not  as  continuously  evolutionary  but  as  tending  toward 
an  ideal  condition  of  moving  equilibrium,  in  which  the  relations 
of  men  to  one  another  will  be  morally  adjusted  and  we  shall  all 
be  as  happy  as  we  can  reasonably  desire.  To  this  conception  he 
adhered  at  all  times  when  he  was  dealing  with  questions  of  personal 
conduct  or  social  policy. 

I  do  not  know  that  it  would  be  worth  while  to  argue  at  length 
that  these  ideas  are  unevolutionary.  The  most  convincing  argu- 
ment is  that  they  have  not  in  fact  been  able  to  endure  as  a  part  of 
evolutionary  thought.  It  is  more  and  more  recognized,  I  think, 
that  while  the  organic  view  of  life  implied  in  Darwinism  is  con- 
sistent with  very  great  emphasis  upon  individuality,  it  also  involves 
an  increasing  consciousness  and  self-direction  in  the  process  as  a 
whole,  irreconcilable  with  the  drastic  reduction  of  state  functions 
advocated  by  Spencer.  And  I  am  not  aware  that  the  idea  of  a 
coming  equilibrium  of  human  relations,  in  the  anticipation  of  which 
we  can  find  a  code  of  conduct,  has  any  important  following  at  the 
present  time.     It  is  felt  to  be  untenable. 

His  ideas  on  general  evolution  find  their  first  expression  in  an 
essay  called  Progress:  Its  Law  and  Cause,  published  in  1857,  and 
are  finally  elaborated  in  First  Principles,  which  appeared  in  1862, 
when  he  was  forty- two  years  old.  The  second  part  of  First  Prin- 
ciples, on  the  Knowable,  contains  matter  which  philosophic  stu- 
dents of  sociology  may  still  find  worth  while,  and  it  is  perhaps  the 
only  part  of  Spencer  which  I  can  recommend  to  such  with  any 
confidence.  His  method  is  to  take  elementary  processes,  such  as 
differentiation  and  co-ordination  of  parts  and  functions,  and  set 
them  forth  with  a  great  array  of  facts  from  the  inorganic,  the 
vegetable,  and  the  animal  worlds,  and  finally  from  the  social. 
This  had  a  great  effect  upon  me  in  the  eighteen-eighties  by  showing 
the  life  of  man  upon  earth  as  one  of  progressive  organization  and 
so  giving  me  an  animating  and  assuring  perspective.     Although 


142  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

I  now  think  that  the  view  thus  revealed  is  superficial,  nevertheless 
it  was  worth  seeing  then  and  I  see  no  reason  why  it  should  not  be 
so  now. 

Regarded  more  closely,  First  Principles  shows  those  defects  of 
which  I  have  spoken.  Human  life  is  perceived  not  directly  but 
through  mechanical  analogies.  The  higher  and  more  distinctively 
human  part  of  it  is  hardly  perceived  at  all;  there  is,  for  example, 
no  discussion  of  the  growth  of  rational  social  guidance  as  a  part 
of  progress.  The  thought  is  mechanized  to  a  degree  almost  incred- 
ible to  one  who  enters  its  stifling  atmosphere  from  the  world  out 
of  doors. 

I  almost  hesitate  to  quote  Spencer's  famous  formula  of  evolution 
lest  I  may  appear  to  be  ridiculing  him.  It  has  a  quaint  sound 
now,  but  as  he  himself  regarded  it  as  quintessential  we  are  hardly 
at  liberty  to  pass  it  by.     It  runs,  then,  as  follows: 

Evolution  is  an  integration  of  matter  and  concomitant  dissipation  of 
motion;  during  which  the  matter  passes  from  an  indefinite,  incoherent  homo- 
geneity to  a  definite,  coherent  heterogeneity;  and  during  which  the  contained 
motion  undergoes  a  parallel  transformation.' 

Now  the  problem  of  evolution  is  the  problem  of  life;  and  it  is 
safe  to  say  that  if  in  the  future  it  is  found  possible  to  sum  up  the 
process  of  life  in  a  formula  it  will  not  be  a  formula  of  this  kind. 
Life  must  be  summed  up  in  terms  of  life,  not  translated  into  another 
language.  Least  of  all  is  such  a  formula  adequate  to  human  life. 
You  can  never  compress  reason  and  beauty  and  hope  and  fellow- 
ship and  the  organic  being  of  communities  and  nations  into  differ- 
entiations, coherences,  and  heterogeneities.  These  terms  may 
be  appHcable  to  human  life,  just  as  you  can  measure  a  man  in 
inches  and  pounds,  but  they  can  never  be  the  essential  and  char- 
acteristic truth  about  it.  There  is  more  light  and  more  good 
sense  in  the  simple  statement  of  Comte  that  progress  ''consists  in 
educing,  more  and  more,  the  characteristic  faculties  of  humanity, 
in  comparison  with  those  of  animality." 

Of  Spencer's  volumes  on  the  Principles  oj  Sociology  I  need  say 
little,  not  that  they  are  unimportant  but  because,  being  a  logical 
development  of  his  First  Principles,  they  do  not  offer  anything 

'  First  Principles,  chap.  xvii. 


THE  SOCIOLOGY  OF  HERBERT  SPENCER  143 

fundamentally  different.  They  are,  in  general,  what  one  might 
expect;  and  the  value  one  sets  upon  them  will  vary  with  one's 
estimate  of  the  point  of  view  and  method.  The  material  was 
collected  under  Spencer's  direction  by  assistants,  usually,  I  think, 
with  a  definite  plan  as  to  what  he  meant  to  get  out  of  it.  It  was 
rather  an  amassing  of  illustrations  than  research,  though  fresh 
ideas  often  occurred  to  him  in  the  process.  If  we  are  content  with 
a  vast  array  of  facts,  sequently  arranged  and  clearly  interpreted 
in  accordance  with  large  but  somewhat  mechanical  conceptions, 
we  shall  regard  these  as  important  works;  if  we  think  that  human 
insight  is  a  sine  qua  non  they  will  seem  little  more  than  a  desert,  the 
more  forbidding  the  more  there  is  of  it. 

Parts  I  and  II  are  of  a  general  character,  called  respectively 
"Data"  and  ''Inductions"  of  sociology.  The  remaining  parts 
deal  with  special  institutions — domestic,  ceremonial,  political, 
ecclesiastical,  professional,  and  industrial.  After  three  brief 
introductory'  chapters  discussing  the  nature  of  social  or  super- 
organic  evolution,  the  classification  of  the  factors,  and  the  influ- 
ence of  climate,  geographical  features,  flora,  and  fauna,  Spencer 
devotes  the  bulk  of  Part  I  to  the  nature  of  primitive  man,  and 
chiefly  to  the  genesis  of  his  religious  ideas.  Although  his  knowledge 
of  this  field  was  necessarily  secondhand,  the  vigor  and  ingenuity  of 
his  mind  enabled  him  here  as  elsewhere  to  advance  views  which 
specialists  regard  with  respect. 

Part  II  is  a  discussion  of  the  organic  character  of  society,  and 
therefore  epitomizes  the  nature  and  limitations  of  his  sociological 
thought.  Instead  of  being  a  direct  and  searching  analysis  of  the 
process  of  human  life,  it  is  wholly  analogical  and  hence  wholly 
superficial.  Not  only  is  the  proposition  "Society  is  an  organism" 
sustained  by  biological  comparisons,  but  the  whole  part,  of  some 
one  hundred  and  fifty  pages,  is  given  to  such  comparisons.  What- 
ever is  said  about  society  is  said  under  the  evident  domination  of 
conceptions  derived  from  another  order  of  phenomena;  and  that 
order  is  rather  the  mechanical  than  the  biological,  since  his  biology 
is  itself  rather  mechanical  than  vital.  The  terms  of  his  summing 
up  are  similar  to  those  of  his  general  formula  of  evolution,  and 
the  whole  part  adds  nothing  of  much  importance  to  what  we  get 


144  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

from  his  First  Principles.  I  would  not  object  to  the  use  of  bio- 
logical analogy  as  a  source  of  nomenclature  and  framework;  every 
new  growth  of  knowledge,  I  suppose,  has  to  use  the  language  of 
the  old.  But  surely  the  material  itself,  the  observation  and  con- 
ception, should  be  essentially  direct  and  fresh,  and  with  Spencer  it 
is  not  so. 

The  elaborate  discussion  of  particular  institutions  that  follows  is 
always  clear,  always  vigorous,  always  ingenious,  and  always  subject 
to  the  limitations  I  have  pointed  out.  In  some  cases,  as  in  his 
treatment  of  the  opposition  between  militarism  and  industrialism, 
he  sets  forth  practical  truth  of  great  moment,  but  never,  I  think, 
without  a  certain  superficiality  inseparable  from  his  method. 

Descriptive  Sociology  is  a  publication,  in  eight  atlas-like  volumes, 
of  material  compiled  by  his  assistants,  primarily  for  other  works, 
and  giving  historical  and  descriptive  data  regarding  the  principal 
savage  and  barbarous  peoples — African,  Asiatic,  and  American — 
and  also  regarding  the  Hebrews  and  Phoenicians,  the  French,  and 
the  English.  The  facts  and  references  are  arranged  in  parallel 
columns  under  appropriate  captions,  so  that  it  is  easy  to  find  what 
one  seeks.  I  have  made  some  use  of  these  works,  and  it  is  my 
impression  that  they  are  much  less  known  than  they  deserve  to  be. 
For  students  making  comparative  studies  covering  a  wide  range 
of  societies  they  should  be  of  much  service.  They  were  published 
by  subscription  and  represent  on  Spencer's  part  a  large  pecuniary 
sacrifice  to  scientific  ideals.  When  their  publication  ceased,  he 
estimated  his  net  loss  at  about  £4,000. 

The  two  strongest  impressions  I  receive  on  re-reading  parts  of 
Spencer  are  that  of  the  fixity  of  his  limitations  and  that  of  the  abun- 
dance of  his  mind  within  those  limitations.  Although,  if  I  am  right, 
his  way  of  seeing  and  thinking  was  not  sociological,  it  was  large, 
keen-edged,  and  propelled  by  an  intellectual  passion  almost  sublime. 
Though  commonly  described  as  an  infidel,  his  work  was  a  signal 
act  of  faith.  Never  timid  or  half-hearted,  he  stained  with  his 
life-blood  every  detail  of  his  vast  scheme  and  defended  it  as  a 
mother  defends  her  child.  He  spent  his  whole  fife  in  the  elucidation 
and  propagation  of  truth  as  he  saw  it,  devoting  without  question 


THE  SOCIOLOGY  OF  HERBERT  SPENCER  145 

his  spirit  and  all  its  instruments  to  this  supreme  object.  Some  of 
his  chief  defects  were  virtues  in  excess;  as  he  might  have  been 
more  of  a  man  of  science  had  he  been  less  ardent  as  a  philosopher 
and  moralist.  That  he  was  a  moralist,  somewhat  dogmatic,  but 
sincere  and  ready  to  make  sacrifices,  there  can  be  no  doubt.  He 
shone  also  as  a  critic  of  easy-going  conventions.  Bold,  ingenious, 
iconoclastic,  pungent  in  illustration,  he  loved  to  demolish  shams  and 
did  it  extremely  well.  He  raked  up  and  burned  much  theological 
and  other  rubbish,  earning  the  gratitude  of  all  the  liberal  world. 

If  I  have  seemed  to  depreciate  him  it  is  perhaps  because  Spencer 
set  his  claims  so  high  that  any  attempt  to  estimate  them 
almost  inevitably  takes  the  form  of  lowering  his  own  mark.  But, 
when  all  is  said,  he  remains  a  man  of  extraordinary  powers  and 
vast  influence  upon  the  thought  of  his  day,  if  not  altogether  the 
equal  mate  of  Darwin  that  we  once  supposed  him  to  be. 


HEREDITY  AND  OVFORTVNITY— Concluded 


ERVILLE  B.  WOODS 

Dartmouth  College 


III.      THE   FAMILY   ENVIRONMENT 

If,  as  has  been  pointed  out  above,  there  is  still  very  much  to 
learn  with  reference  to  the  inheritance  of  mental  traits,  it  is  even 
more  true  that  an  almost  unknown  territory  awaits  exploration 
by  those  who  have  the  hardihood  to  attempt  the  measurement  of 
environmental  forces. 

The  earliest  phase  of  the  social  environment  to  act  upon  the 
individual  is  that  of  the  family.  There  is  a  legacy,  not  of  blood, 
which  every  child  receives  from  the  home  influences  which  sur- 
round him.  It  is  this  fact  which  makes  the  pedigrees  of  notorious 
pauper  and  criminal  families  somewhat  less  convincing  than  they 
appear  at  first  sight.  It  is  conceivable  that  a  durable  tradition 
of  lawlessness  or  of  thriftlessness  may  estabhsh  itself  in  stock  of 
quite  ordinary  quality — no  worse  in  fact  than  the  average  of  the 
population.  The  most  intimate  studies  of  our  criminal  population 
reveal  a  large  number  of  individuals  whose  difficulties  appear  to 
be  grounded  in  just  this  situation,  viz.:  a  lawless  or  immoral 
tradition  which  the  submerged  individual  assimilates  as  inevitably 
as  persons  born  in  a  higher  social  class  appropriate  law-abiding  and 
property-respecting  traditions. 

To  the  thoroughgoing  eugenist  the  family  environment  appears 
to  be  nothing  but  the  projection  of  the  family  germplasm.  Bad 
family  environment,  ergo,  bad  heredity.  Nothing  is  simpler  than 
the  unctuous  fatalism  with  which  the  WTiethams,  for  example,  dis- 
pose of  the  whole  question: 

There  is,  to  put  it  mildly,  a  strong  probability  that  the  environment 
normally  provided  by  the  parents  and  the  immediate  family  will  be  fairly 
well  suited  to  children  who  inherit  the  same  inborn  qualities,  that  the  same 
occupations  will  attract  their  capacity,  the  same  interests  absorb  their  leisure 
hours.' 

^Heredity  and  Society,  p.  121. 

146 


HEREDITY  AND  OPPORTUNITY  147 

The  commingling  of  nature  and  nurture  in  the  family  circle 
is  charmingly  revealed  in  the  early  experiences  of  Maxim  Gorky 
as  reported  in  In  the  World.  The  figure  of  the  staunch,  lovable 
grandmother — philosopher  and  gatherer  of  herbs — appears  and 
reappears  in  his  pages.  Sometimes  she  taught  him  lessons  of 
courage  and  patience,  often  she  remarked  a  propos  of  the  sordid 
brutal  life  about  them,  "When  one  thinks  of  people,  one  cannot 
help  being  sorry  for  them,"  and  of  one  of  those  mysterious  and 
wonderful  days  afield  he  writes:  "I  followed  her  silently  and 
cautiously,  not  to  attract  her  attention.  I  did  not  wish  to  inter- 
rupt her  conversation  with  God,  the  herbs  and  the  frogs.  But 
she  saw  me."  Here  was  a  nature  which  had  bequeathed  to  him,  no 
doubt,  much  of  his  rich  poetic  imagination,  but  here  also  was  a 
companionship  as  fructifying  for  inner  development  as  spring 
sunHght  upon  young  plants. 

Sir  Francis  Galton  has  given  us  some  well-known  passages 
dealing  with  the  judges  of  England  under  the  impression  that  he 
was  analyzing  the  forces  of  heredity  only.  It  would  appear  that 
much  else  was  involved,  especially  the  factor  now  in  question — 
family  tradition  and  family  position.     As  Dr.  Devon  points  out, 

it  is  conveniently  assumed  that  position  is  of  no  importance.  Everybody 
knows  that  in  the  professions  chosen  to  illustrate  the  theory  [i.e.,  of  transmitted 
ability]  promotion  is  not  wholly  dependent  on  abUity.  That  a  father  and  son 
have  both  been  judges  offers  no  presumption  of  special  fitness  on  the  part  of 
the  son.  That  high  military  rank  has  been  held  by  several  members  of  the 
same  family  need  not  prove  any  of  them  to  be  great  soldiers.' 

Van  Denburg  in  his  study  of  the  Causes  of  the  Elimination  of 
Students  in  Public  Secondary  Schools  of  New  York  City^  gives  us  an 
example  of  a  quite  different  sort  where  a  family  environment, 
instead  of  affording  a  point  of  vantage  from  which  to  survey 
and  appropriate  hfe's  opportunities,  acts  rather  as  a  handicap 
which  can  be  overcome  only  with  the  greatest  difficulty.  After 
pointing  out  that  seven-eighths  of  the  pupils  entering  high  school 
fail  to  graduate,  he  says: 

At  least  seventy-five  per  cent  of  the  pupils  who  enter  have  brains,  the 
native  abiUty  to  graduate  if  they  chose  to  apply  themselves.     They  come  from 

'  The  Criminal  and  the  Community,  p.  20.  ^Op.  cii.,  pp.  183-84. 


148  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

homes  where  there  is  no  intellectual  tradition  of  study  for  study's  sake.  They 
feel  the  pressure  of  limited  means,  parental  sacrifice,  narrow  living,  if  not  the 
pinch  of  poverty.  They  desire  to  be  independent  financially  of  the  home,  to 
help  with  the  rent,  to  buy  their  own  clothes.  They  see  no  use  in  the  high 
school  as  a  means  to  a  better  livelihood.  They  want  a  little  pleasure  in  living, 
some  time  to  play,  to  visit  with  their  friends,  to  enjoy  themselves  in  their  own 
amusements.  Study  to  them  is  not  a  pleasure,  it  is  the  hardest  and  most  dis- 
agreeable kind  of  work.  They  lack  the  faith  to  see  in  it  a  road  to  better  things. 
They  do  not  know  personally  men  and  women  who  are  high-school  graduates 
save  only  their  teachers.  The  lives  of  the  men  teachers  seem  exacting  and 
profitless  to  the  boys.     Few,  indeed,  desire  to  emulate  them. 

It  is  a  commonplace  to  point  out  that  certain  types  of  homes 
foster  industry,  ambition,  or  conscientious  regard  for  duty.  It  is 
interesting,  however,  to  note  that  in  college  careers  large  classes 
of  men  are  influenced  apparently  by  something  in  the  home  environ- 
ment impelling  them  to  quite  dififerent  degrees  of  energy  in  their 
scholastic  achievements.  Of  about  2,500  recent  graduates  of 
Dartmouth  College  it  appears  that  sons  of  clergymen  averaged 
77  per  cent  for  their  entire  college  course,  whereas  sons  of  business 
men  averaged  only  71  per  cent  and  sons  of  farmers  74  per  cent. 
Of  416  sons  of  bankers  and  manufacturers,  16  per  cent  took  high 
rank  (a  grade  of  over  80),  and  45  per  cent,  low  rank  (a  grade  of 
less  than  70),  while  of  505  sons  of  artisans  and  farmers,  23  per  cent 
took  high  rank,  or  about  one  and  one-half  as  many  proportionately, 
and  33  per  cent  took  low  rank,  or  only  three-fourths  as  many  pro- 
portionately. 

Stated  in  slightly  different  form,  these  figures  mean  that  whereas 
the  sons  of  bankers  and  manufacturers  contributed  approximately 
one  high-rank  man  to  every  three  low-rank  men,  the  sons  of 
artisans  and  farmers  contributed  two  high-rank  men  to  every  three 
low-rank  men.  Selection,  no  doubt,  plays  a  certain  part  in  the 
explanation  of  these  differences,  but  beyond  variations  in  the  make- 
up of  the  groups,  there  are  evidently  subtle  differences  in  outlook 
upon  college  and  attitude  toward  the  intellectual  life  which  char- 
acterize these  various  occupational  groups.  Of  the  clergyman, 
for  example,  we  may  say  that  his  work  necessitates  a  close  com- 
panionship with  books,  that  these  books  and  the  literary  activities 
which  accompany  their  use,  have  their  place  within  the  home  and 


HEREDITY  AND  OPPORTUNITY  149 

are  not  without  their  effect  upon  the  sons.  The  son  of  the  farmer 
has  learned  the  lesson  of  hard  work  and  knows  that  nature  yields 
her  increase  only  under  compulsion.  The  artisan's  son  is  pre- 
disposed to  value  highly  opportunities  which  appear  so  far  beyond 
the  reach  of  most  boys  in  his  economic  class.  Sons  of  business 
men,  on  the  other  hand,  may  not  have  had  either  familiarity 
with  the  intellectual  life  at  home  nor  with  the  discipline  of  hard 
work  under  adverse  economic  conditions.  A  college  education 
may  be  only  the  closing  episode  in  a  long  series  of  conventional 
experiences  which  have  befallen  them  without  much  volition  or 
responsibility  on  their  part. 

If,  however,  the  differences  between  boys  from  various  occupa- 
tional groups  seem  slight  and  difficult  to  interpret  in  the  case  of 
college  students,  they  are  far  from  uncertain  when  ascertained 
for  pupils  in  the  common  schools. 

In  1 9 10  a  statistical  study  was  undertaken  by  the  writer  of  the 
ambitions  and  plans  of  boys  in  the  seventh  and  eighth  grades  of  the 
public  schools  of  the  city  of  St.  Paul.^  Altogether  1,076  boys  wrote 
answers  to  the  following  questions:  "Do  you  expect  to  go  to  high 
school?"  "What  is  your  father's  exact  occupation?"  "What 
occupation  or  work  do  you  think  you  would  like  best  to  work  at  all 
your  lif e  ?  "  "  Why  do  you  think  you  would  like  that  occupation  ? ' ' 
Material  was  thus  provided  for  a  rough  sort  of  reconstruction  in 
statistical  terms  of  a  part  of  the  family  environment  of  these  one 
thousand  boys.  Their  replies  reflected  interesting  differences  in 
family  outlooks  upon  the  possibilities  of  life.  In  answer  to  the 
question:  "Do  you  expect  to  go  to  high  school  ?  "  94  per  cent  of  the 
boys  from  the  professional  class  replied  in  the  affirmative,  86  per 
cent  of  the  mercantile  class,  74  per  cent  of  the  clerical,  61  per  cent 
of  the  artisan  class,  and  54  per  cent  of  the  sons  of  laborers.  A 
total  of  990  boys  expressed  a  preference  for  some  sort  of  work.  Of 
these.  III  chose  each  his  father's  identical  occupation,  or  about 
II  per  cent.  There  was  evident  in  the  figures  a  considerable 
tendency  to  choose  occupations  in  the  same  general  order  of  voca- 
tion as  that  in  which  the  father  was  employed;   thus  three-fifths 

'  See  "  The  Social  Waste  of  Unguided  Personal  Ability,"  Americal  Journal  of 
Sociology,  XIX,  (November,  1913),  358. 


ISO  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

of  the  sons  of  professional  men  wished  to  be  professional  men  and 
two-fifths  of  the  sons  of  artisans  wished  to  be  artisans  and  one- 
fourth  of  the  sons  of  merchants  wished  to  be  merchants.  Another 
tendency  was  also  well  marked  and  disclosed  a  sharp  line  of  cleav- 
age between  the  manual  and  non-manual  occupations.  The  sons 
of  fathers  engaged  in  the  four  groups  of  non-manual  occupations 
were  alike  in  recording  the  largest  number  of  choices  in  favor  of  the 
professions.  Such  work  appeared  to  be  the  ideal  of  clerks',  mer- 
chants', and  professional  men's  sons  alike.  But  the  most  frequent 
choice  of  the  manual  workers'  sons  was  uniformly  some  skilled 
trade  with  agriculture  tying  for  the  first  place  in  the  case  of  the 
small  group  of  farmers'  sons.  These  figures  illustrate  very  clearly 
that  vocational  ambitions  in  the  absence  of  skilful  vocational 
guidance  are  relative  to  family  outlook  and  sophistication.  Prefer- 
ences appear  to  be  conditioned  by  the  vocational  viewpoint  estab- 
lished by  the  occupation  of  the  father. 

IV,   THE  SOCIAL  LEVEL  OF  OPPORTUNITY 

Opportunity  implies  the  absence  of  barriers  between  indi\'iduals 
and  the  high  places  of  life  except,  of  course,  the  barriers  interposed 
by  inherited  personal  inferiority.  Complete  equality  of  oppor- 
tunity has  probably  never  existed  anywhere  in  the  world,  for  the 
distribution  of  knowledge  and  the  distribution  of  wealth  have 
everywhere  been  of  such  a  sort  as  to  establish  an  initial  inequahty 
at  the  very  beginning  of  the  race.  These  initial  differences  can, 
of  course,  be  reduced  by  improvements  in  the  practice  of  pubHc 
education  and  by  the  gradual  emergence  of  a  social  democracy 
correlative  with  political  democracy.  In  Chile,  Professor  Ross 
tells  us,'  it  is  impossible  for  the  bright  boys  born  in  the  mud  huts 
of  the  common  people  to  advance  into  the  government  service  or 
the  liberal  professions  because  preparation  for  the  free  high  school 
and  university  is  provided  only  by  private  fitting  schools.  The 
classes,  therefore,  who  are  too  poor  to  pay  the  tuition  are  effectively 
prevented  from  making  any  exit  from  their  own  level.  Little  of 
such  conscious  artificial  limitation  is  imposed  upon  the  poor  of  our 
own  land,  yet  the  results,  due  to  the  economic  and  cultural  poverty 

'See"  Class  and  Caste,"  American  Journal  of  Sociology,  XVIII  (May,  1917),  757. 


HEREDITY  AND  OPPORTUNITY  151 

into  which  millions  of  our  population  are  born,  are  of  the  same 
sort  though  in  lesser  degree.  I  should  like  to  emphasize  the  term 
just  used — cultural  poverty — and  to  point  out  that  the  son  of  a 
Croatian  miner  in  a  soft-coal  town  of  southwestern  Pennsylvania 
or  northern  Ilhnois  may  be  almost  as  handicapped  at  fourteen 
years  of  age,  after  stumbling  through  five  grades  of  a  parochial 
school  taught  by  poorly  educated  sisters,  themselves  born  in 
Austria-Hungary,  as  though  he  were  Hving  in  a  mud  hut  in  Chile. 
To  say  that  his  poverty  is  only  a  stimulus  to  ambitious  effort  and 
that  if  he  is  a  lad  o'parts  he  will  pull  up  out  of  his  environment  is 
pure  nonsense  to  anyone  who  has  lived  in  such  a  community. 
A  soft-coal  town  in  northern  Illinois  did  give  the  country  a  John 
Mitchell,  but  he  may  well  be  the  exception  which  proves  the  rule, 
and  he  escaped,  moreover,  the  handicap  of  a  foreign-speaking 
home  and  the  cultural  destitution  of  the  Croatian  peasant.  Not 
less  than  two-thirds  of  the  workers  in  the  great  basic  industries 
of  America,  such  as  coal-mining,  copper-  and  iron-mining,  blast 
furnaces,  rolling  mills,  and  iron  foundries  are  either  foreign-born 
or  of  foreign  or  mixed  parentage.  This  is  liable  to  prove  a  handicap 
in  proportion  as  the  race  to  which  they  belong  has  come  recently 
to  this  country  and  is  separated  from  American  culture  by  a  con- 
siderable interval.  Here,  then,  are  social  levels  of  opportunity 
upon  which  our  industrial  population  is  arranged  not  unlike  the 
successive  levels  of  a  Roman  amphitheater. 

A  similar  and  striking  difference  exists  between  different  geo- 
graphical locaHties.  George  R.  Davies,  following  the  lead  of 
Odin,  Lester  F.  Ward,  and  others,  has  demonstrated  in  statistical 
terms  the  marked  superiority  of  a  densely  populated  over  a  sparsely 
populated  region  in  the  production  of  men  of  note.'  Contrary 
to  a  popular  impression  it  is  the  cities  with  the  regions  immediately 
surrounding  them  which  have  produced  eminent  men  out  of  all 
proportion  to  their  population.  This  is  apparently  equally  true 
on  both  sides  of  the  Atlantic  and  is  undoubtedly  due  to  the  fact 
that  in  cities  are  found  hbraries,  museums,  galleries,  universities, 
courts,  bureaus,  and  other  cultural  and  commercial  paraphernalia 
by  the  use  of  which  men  raise  themselves  in  the  scale  of  productivity. 

'  See  hi?  Social  Environment. 


152  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

Another  circumstance  appears  to  make  a  marked  difference 
between  sections;  I  refer  to  the  effectiveness  of  elementary  educa- 
tion as  measured  by  the  literacy  of  the  population  and  by  the 
school  attendance.  The  six  New  England  states,  for  example,  in  a 
comparison  embracing  twenty-nine  states  in  all,  ranked  in  regard 
to  elementary  education  in  i860,  first,  second,  third,  fourth,  fifth, 
and  eighth,  and  in  regard  to  output  of  noted  men,  as  indicated  by 
entries  in  Who's  Who  for  191 2,  they  ranked  first,  second,  third, 
fourth,  fifth,  and  seventh.  Arkansas  and  Florida,  on  the  other 
hand,  ranked  twenty-seventh  and  twenty-ninth  in  regard  to  ele- 
mentary education,  and  twenty-ninth  and  twenty-seventh  respec- 
tively in  regard  to  production  of  noted  men  in  191 2. 

One  may  say,  therefore,  that  mere  presence  in  an  urban  region 
as  compared  with  a  remote  rural  section,  or  in  ^Massachusetts  as 
compared  with  Arkansas,  constitutes  a  distinct  opportunity  for 
personal  advancement  which  has  even  been  made  the  subject  of 
statistical  calculation.  Here  are  the  beginnings  perhaps  of  the 
measurement  of  the  influence  of  social  environment. 

A  recent  writer  has  said:  "Good  books,  like  well  built  houses, 
must  have  tradition  behind  them.  The  Homers  and  Shakespeares 
and  Goethes  spring  from  rich  soil  left  by  dead  centuries;  they  are 
like  native  trees  that  grow  so  well  nowhere  else."  It  is  not  by 
accident  that  our  men  of  mark  come  from  the  ancient  haunts 
of  culture  and  learning  and  from  the  great  marts  of  trade.  It  is 
here  that  time  has  left  its  richest  deposits,  here  that  the  social 
environment  resembles  in  some  measure  the  soil  of  the  forest 
enriched  by  the  mold  of  the  leaves  of  unnumbered  autumns;  for 
it  is  the  peculiarity  of  a  city  that,  though  young  in  years,  it  soon 
sets  up  institutions  which  embody  the  age-long  traditions  of  the 
race. 

There  remains  one  highly  dynamic  factor  in  the  production  of 
opportunity,  which  has  been  defined,  in  what  precedes,  as  the 
absence  of  harriers.  This  is  a  merely  negative  view,  however,  which 
needs  to  be  supplemented  by  the  positive  conception  of  opportunity 
as  efeclive  stimulation.  It  is  not  mere  comfort,  nor  freedom  from 
discrimination,  nor  even  leisure,  but  rather  positive  stimuli  to 
definite  lines  of  action,  which  are  of  greater  importance  in  the 


HEREDITY  AND  OPPORTUNITY  153 

lives  of  those  who  are  most  auspiciously  situated.  At  certain 
times  conjunctures  of  events  result  in  a  great  increase  and  intensifi- 
cation of  these  urgent  appeals  to  action.  Such  a  time  was  that 
immediately  after  the  period  of  discoveries  when  the  self-complacent 
conservatism  of  the  Middle  Ages  was  giving  way  to  a  new  and 
restless  spirit  of  progress.  Columbus  and  the  Portuguese  had 
added  new  worlds  to  the  old;  Copernicus  had  bidden  men  look 
beyond  terrestrial  limits  into  the  field  of  the  universe.  The 
printing-press  was  rendering  possible  the  rapid  dissemination  of 
thought  and  a  "strange  curiosity"  and  thirst  for  learning  had 
taken  possession  of  men's  minds.  Books  of  travel  in  distant 
lands  were  seized  upon  and  read  with  the  greatest  eagerness. 
Grecian  scholars  had  spread  throughout  Western  Europe,  and  the 
study  of  the  Greek  classics  had  made  its  way  into  the  universities. 
Everywhere  the  old  forms  of  faith  and  learning  were  being  shaken 
to  their  foundations.  It  was  an  era  of  revision  and  of  revolutionary 
change,  not  wholly  unlike  the  present.  The  spirit  of  a  new  time 
was  calling  upon  the  old  to  give  account  of  itself  or  yield  ground. 
Such  was  the  spiritual  environment  out  of  which  there  issued  a 
period  of  the  greatest  literary  and  intellectual  achievement. 

In  the  field  of  scientific  discoveries  a  single  new  conception 
or  a  single  great  invention  may  stimulate  achievement  in  almost 
geometrical  progression.  Inventions  notably  wait  upon  one 
another  and,  once  a  stubborn  obstacle  has  been  overcome,  applica- 
tion follows  appHcation  as  logs  go  out  when  once  the  jam  is  broken. 

In  industrial  development  conjunctures  in  the  exploitation  of 
new  resources,  such  as  steam  applied  to  locomotion,  or  water 
power  to  the  production  of  electricity,  or  the  discovery  of  the 
commercial  possibilities  of  petroleum  in  the  fifties  of  the  last  cen- 
tury, create  situations  where  achievement  is  inevitable.  Out  of  the 
crude-oil  situation  in  western  Pennsylvania  in  the  sixties  almost 
anything  might  have  come,  assuming  flexibility  of  conditions,  but 
assuming  railroad  and  commercial  ethics  as  they  actually  were, 
assuming  the  laissez  faire  political  philosophy  then  rampant  in  this 
country,  assuming  the  young  commission  man  in  Cleveland,  who 
had  learned  from  a  shrewd  close-figuring  father  how  to  buy  and  how 
to  sell,  who  had  learned  also  that  "I  could  get  as  much  interest 


154  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

for  fifty  dollars  loaned  at  seven  per  cent  ....  as  I  could  earn 
by  digging  potatoes  for  one  hundred  days,"  assuming  all  this, 
then  the  creation  of  the  greatest  fortune  of  history  appears  to  be 
a  highly  natural  phenomenon.  Here  was  the  opportunity  for 
a  tremendous  stroke,  a  master-exploitation,  which  only  awaited  a 
man  with  imagination  big  enough,  a  trader's  technique  shrewd 
enough,  and  a  stomach  stout  enough  to  withstand  the  necessary 
desolation  that  commercial  buccaneering  and  submarining  always 
entail.  Mr.  Rockefeller  does  not  profess  to  any  of  the  virtues  of  the 
ordinary  producer,  such  as  industry,  technical  proficiency,  and  the 
like,  but,  quite  on  the  contrary,  confides  in  a  magazine  interview: 

People  persist  in  thinking  that  I  was  a  tremendous  worker,  always  at  it 
early  and  late,  summer  and  winter.  The  real  truth  is  that  I  was  what  would 
now  be  called  a  "slacker"  after  I  reached  my  middle  thirties.  I  used  to  take 
long  vacations  at  my  Cleveland  home  every  summer  and  spent  my  time  planting 
and  transplanting  trees,  building  roads,  doing  landscape  gardening,  driving 
horses  and  enjoying  myself  with  my  family,  keeping  in  touch  with  business  by 
private  telegraph  wire.  I  never,  from  the  time  I  first  entered  an  office,  let 
business  engross  all  my  time  and  attention;  I  always  took  an  active  interest  in 
Sunday  school  and  church  work,  in  children  and,  if  I  might  say  so,  in  doing 
little  things  for  friendless  and  lonely  and  poor  people.' 

I  once  held  an  interesting  conversation  with  an  aged  French- 
Canadian,  who  had  been  the  employer  of  James  J.  Hill  when  the 
latter  worked  for  wages  as  one  of  a  flat-boat  crew  who  with  long 
poles  propelled  cargoes  of  freight  up  the  Minnesota  River  from 
Fort  Snelling.  Here  again  is  the  case  of  a  remarkable  man  who 
fell  into  a  remarkable  situation.  Mr.  Hill  had  the  discernment 
to  perceive  that  the  Northwest  was  pregnant  with  economic  oppor- 
tunity where  others  could  see  only  sterile  wilderness.  He  had 
other  quahties  by  which  in  the  end  he  profited  enormously  from  a 
conjuncture  which  will  not  occur  again  in  American  railroad  history. 

It  is  absurd  to  attempt  to  account  for  such  conspicuous  eco- 
nomic success  solely  in  terms  of  individual  traits.  The  role  of 
great  "once-for-all"  opportunities  must  be  recognized. 

Professor  William  James  has  made  some  interesting  comments 
upon  opportunity  in  his  essay  "Great  Men  and  Their  Environ- 
ment": 

'B.  C.  Forbes  in  Leslie's,  quoted  in  Current  Opinion,  LXIII,  308-9. 


HEREDITY  AND  OPPORTUNITY  155 

It  is  true  that  certain  types  are  irrepressible.  Voltaire,  Shelley,  Carlyle, 
can  hardly  be  conceived  leading  a  dumb  and  vegetable  life  in  any  epoch. 
But  take  JNIr.  Galton  himself,  take  his  cousin,  Mr.  Darwin  and  take  Mr. 
Spencer;  nothing  is  to  me  more  conceivable  than  that  at  another  epoch  all 
three  of  these  men  might  have  died  "with  all  their  music  in  them,"  known  only 
to  their  friends  as  persons  of  strong  and  original  character  and  judgment. 
What  has  started  them  on  their  career  of  effective  greatness  is  simply  the 
accident  of  each  stumbling  upon  a  task  vast,  brilliant  and  congenial  enough 
to  call  out  the  convergence  of  all  his  passions  and  powers.  I  see  no  more  reason 
why,  in  case  they  had  not  fallen  in  with  their  several  hobbies  at  propitious 
periods  in  their  life,  they  need  necessarily  have  hit  upon  other  hobbies  and 
made  themselves  equally  great.  Their  case  seems  similar  to  that  of  the  Wash- 
ingtons,  Cromwells,  and  Grants,  who  simply  rose  to  their  occasions.' 

There  is  no  reason  to  believe  that  the  "accident  of  stumbling 
upon  tasks  vast,  brilliant  and  congenial"  happens  to  every  able 
character,  nor  that  occasions  are  always  presented  to  which  they 
may  rise.  Indeed,  Professor  Jastrow,  another  psychologist  who 
has  pondered  this  problem,  writes:  ".  .  .  .  for  every  case  of 
marked  success,  there  must  be  many  more  competitors  of  quite 
equal  capacity  whom  the  discouragements  of  circumstance,  or  the 
distraction  of  interests,  or  the  ill-adjustment  of  appraisal,  has 
deprived  of  a  like  measure  of  reward."^  When  we  consider  the 
professional  men  of  our  acquaintance  who  are  alert,  suave,  indus- 
trious, adaptable,  conscientious,  plausible,  rather  than  possessed 
of  any  exceptional  intellectual  gifts,  I  venture  to  think  that  among 
cobblers  or  carpenters,  farmers  or  sailors,  there  may  be  as  many, 
also  alert,  suave,  industrious,  adaptable,  conscientious,  or  plausible, 
who,  if  they  had  had  the  appropriate  stimulus  and  the  requisite 
advantages,  would  be  teaching  pharmacy  or  philology,  or  sitting 
in  a  swivel  chair  under  beetling  rows  of  professional  treatises  of  some 
sort  as  acceptably  on  the  whole  as  those  who  are  actually  doing  these 
things  today. 

We  have  considered  opportunity  in  its  negative  aspect  as  the 
absence  of  barriers  to  personal  achievement,  and  in  its  positive 
aspect  as  appropriate  stimulation  to  achievement;  in  conclusion 
it  is  probably  safe  to  say  that  great  as  are  the  differences  between 

'  The  Will  to  Believe  and  Other  Essays,  pp.  242-43. 
'  The  Qualities  of  Men,  pp.  128-89. 


156  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

men,  the  differences  between  the  situations  in  which  men  find  them- 
selves are  of  even  greater  and  more  bewildering  variety. 

V.      SOCIAL   SITUATIONS   AND   PSYCHICAL   TONE 

Reference  has  already  been  made  to  the  great  difference  in  men 
in  regard  to  spontaneity  and  passivity  in  the  presence  of  the  social 
environment.  Some  go  self-propelled  through  life  seeming  almost 
to  create  the  scenes  and  settings  needed  for  their  own  heroic  roles. 
Others  are  borne  aloft  only  upon  the  crest  of  some  wave  of  social 
revolution  or  intellectual  upheaval.  We  have  now  to  examine 
some  of  the  circumstances  which  wake  men  up,  which  create  in 
them  that  high  potential  of  energy  which  in  most  men  would 
suffice  for  great  achievement  if  once  they  could  throw  it  into  gear. 
The  most  natural  point  of  departure  for  a  study  of  these  factors  is 
probably  that  remarkable  little  essay  of  William  James,  entitled 
"The  Energies  of  Men,"  and  most  of  the  factors  enumerated 
here  are  discussed  in  his  brilliant  pages. 

It  has  often  been  noticed  that  commonplace  men  once  elevated 

to  conspicuous  and  responsible  positions  in  the  government,  with 

the  eyes  of  the  whole  people  fastened  upon  them,  sometimes  achieve 

a  level  of  performance  which  could  never  have  been  predicted  from 

anything  in  their  previous  records.     Desperate  situations  of  all 

kinds,  including  war  with  its  wild  alarms,  likewise  never  fail  to 

reveal  heroic  and  masterful  natures  which  had  not  before  been 

put  to  the  proof.     As  James  puts  it  ''Every  siege  or  shipwreck 

or  polar  expedition  brings  out  some  hero  who  keeps  the  whole 

company  in  heart."     The  unexpected  heroism  shown  in  the  face 

of  death  by  some  of  the  dissolute  ne'er-do-wells  in  Kitchener's 

army  moved  Donald  Hankey  to  words  which  will  not  soon  be 

forgotten : 

Portentous  solemn  death,  you  looked  a  fool  when  you  tackled  one  of  them! 
Life?  They  did  not  value  life!  They  had  never  been  able  to  make  much  of 
a  fist  of  it.  But  if  they  hved  amiss  they  died  gloriously,  with  a  smile  for  the 
pain  and  the  dread  of  it.  What  else  had  they  been  born  for  ?  It  was  their 
chance. 

Not  only  in  the  fury  of  battle,  but  in  the  lives  of  all  those  who 
have  made  their  last  reckoning  with  selfish  ends  and  henceforth 
look  out  serene  and  detached  upon  a  world  of  purely  objective 


HEREDITY  AND  OPPORTUNITY  157 

causes,  we  catch  a  glimpse  of  a  new  and  higher  order  of  achieve- 
ment.    Sandeman  in  his  Uncle  Gregory  refers  to 

that  quite  unmistakable  note  that  you  get  in  a  very  few  people,  who,  in  one 
way  or  another,  have  actually  accepted  death,  and  are  only,  so  to  speak,  alive 
in  the  meantime.  It  belongs  to  the  flawless  perfection  of  the  military  spirit 
with  its  entire  detachment  from  Ufe  itself,  from  self-will,  from  fear,  and  from 
ease,  and  from  all  pretenses.' 

An  essential  part  of  this  heightened  and  intensified  energizing 
is  the  heightened  emotion  which  accompanies  it.  Some  of  the  men 
thrown  up  out  of  the  depths  by  the  convulsion  of  the  world-war 
have  been  almost  incandescent  in  their  emotional  intensity.  Such 
was  Kerensky.  From  a  physical  weakness  so  great  that  "before 
the  revolution  a  single  speech  seemed  to  leave  him  on  the  verge  of 
collapse,"  he  went  on  from  strength  to  strength  "for  weeks  on 
end,  delivering  a  dozen  or  a  score  of  such  speeches  in  a  single  day, 
and  finding  time  in  the  intervals  between  them  to  pour  out  procla- 
mations, appeals,  and  decisions  on  the  most  critical  matters  of 
the  most  vital  of  all  the  departments  of  state.  "^ 

Louis  Raemakers,  the  influence  of  whose  cartoons  was  estimated 

by  the  Germans  in  terms  of  army  corps, 

was  unheard  of  previous  to  the  opening  of  the  great  war.  On  the  first  of 
August,  1914,  he  was  living  quietly  with  his  family,  contentedly  painting  the 
tulip  fields,  waterways,  cattle  and  windmills  of  his  native  Holland.  Four 
days  later  he  drew  the  first  cartoon,  "Christendom  after  Twenty  Centuries," 
of  a  series  that  was  to  reveal  him  as  a  champion  of  civilization  and  make  his 
name  a  household  word  in  every  country  .J 

In  the  early  days  of  the  war  he  went  to  Belgium  and,  as  he  put  it, 
"explored  hell." 

Another  psychic  factor  of  much  importance  in  accounting  for 
achievement  is  the  spiritual  uplift  of  a  moral  victory ;  still  another, 
the  impact  of  great  and  heavily  laden  ideas  such  as  Fatherland, 
"God  wills  it,"  Democracy,  Truth,  Holy  Church,  etc. 

Conversion  in  the  religious  sense  often  emancipates  locked-up 
energies  as  does  also  "methodical  ascetic  discipline"  which  keeps 
"the  deeper  levels  constantly  in  reach." 

'  Quoted  by  Thomson  in  Darwinism  and  Human  Life,  p.  226. 

'E.  H.  Wilcox,  "  Kerensky  and  the  Revolution,"  Atlantic  Monthly,  November, 
1917. 

3 See  "  Book  Notes"  in  Century  Magazine  (January,  1918). 


158  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

A  complete  theory  of  genius  has  been  erected  upon  the  semi- 
religious  conception  of  detachment  from  self  and  objectivity  in 
one's  attitude  toward  life,  which,  as  we  have  seen,  characterizes 
those  utterly  devoted  to  great  and  perilous  causes.     Tuerck  says: 

The  man  of  genius  develops  an  activity  apparently  similar  to  that  of 
other  men,  but  in  which  his  inspired  nature  inwardly  assumes  a  totally  different 
attitude  toward  what  he  does  or  leaves  undone,  his  actions  being  in  truth  only 
play,  having  no  reference  to  his  own  individual  self,  whereas  other  people  are 
clumsily  and  ridiculously  in  earnest  about  their  own  petty  existence,  an  exist- 
ence at  the  mercy  of  any  and  every  accident.  Hence  the  calm  and  great 
courage  of  the  man  of  genius,  his  clear  and  unprejudiced  outlook,  his  extraor- 
dinary boldness  combined  with  the  greatest  coolness,  his  irresistible  advance 
along  the  path  he  has  once  traced  out  for  himself.' 

According  to  James,  heightened  emotional  excitement  or  "some 
unusual  idea  of  necessity^'  are  the  stimuli  which  induce  these 
extraordinary  manifestations  of  energy  and  of  will,  and  he  believes 
"that  men  the  world  over  possess  amounts  of  resource  which  only 
exceptional  individuals  push  to  their  extremes  of  use." 

This  faith  in  the  energies  of  men,  properly  stimulated,  contains 
no  disparagement  of  the  legitimate  claims  put  forth  in  behalf  of 
inheritance ;  he  who  is  by  nature  a  potential  dynamo  of  power  may 
well  surpass  in  achievement  the  man  who  has  but  feeble  resources, 
granted  both  are  performing  under  a  maximum  load,  but  who 
takes  on  the  burdens  of  the  world's  thinking  and  loving  and  invent- 
ing and  directing  is  another  question,  and  we  shall  have  to  admit 
that  the  stimuH  coming  from  the  social  environment  are  very 
potent  in  determining  who  actually  carry  their  maximum  loads. 
It  still  holds  that  "we  inherit  all  the  faculties  and  powers  which 
we  possess,  but  what  they  are  only  the  event  shows.  Nothing  can 
be  taken  out  of  a  man  but  what  is  in  him,  but  there  may  be  a 
good  deal  in  him  which  is  never  taken  out." 

VI.      THE    SOCIAL  VERDICT 

In  connection  with  the  preceding  topics  an  attempt  has  been 
made  to  distinguish  the  things  of  Nature  from  the  things  of  Nurture. 
No  two  men  it  appears  are  alike,  but  on  the  contrary  they  vary 
enormously  in  natural  capacity.     The  social  environment  in  which 

'  The  Man  oj  Ccnuis,  p.  60. 


HEREDITY  AND  OPPORTUNITY  159 

they  are  immersed  is  also  as  variegated  as  one  can  conceive,  and 
when  the  innumerable  permutations  of  circumstance  which  play 
upon  the  individual  are  considered,  it  is  entirely  safe  to  say  that 
no  two  men  ever  find  life  the  same.  A  man's  environment,  there- 
fore, is  no  less  unique  than  his  heredity.  The  frequent  practice 
of  writers  upon  this  subject,  who  assume  out  of  hand  that  brothers, 
or  classmates,  or  members  of  a  given  social  class  are  subjected  to 
the  same  social  environment,  is  the  occasion  of  much  fallacious 
reasoning.  Identical  twins  even,  bred  alike,  dressed  and  educated 
alike,  indistinguishable  possibly  to  their  own  parents,  may  be  as 
far  apart  as  the  poles  when  it  comes  to  that  intimate  isolation  of  the 
spirit  which  we  call  individuality.  Alike  in  the  superficial  experi- 
ences of  life,  surrounded  by  the  same  walls  and  the  same  people, 
they  may  nevertheless  differ  unspeakably  in  all  that  really  matters 
in  the  things  of  the  spirit. 

We  come  at  length  to  a  final  question— that  of  the  social 
appraisal  of  personal  quality.  The  outstanding  fact  appears  to 
be  that  both  the  various  hereditary  values,  and  the  many  sorts 
of  achievement  values  are  alike  rated  high  or  low,  according  to 
somewhat  capricious  social  standards. 

Bagehot  has  offered  a  clear  formulation  of  this  principle  in 
the  following  passage : 

If  any  particular  power  is  much  prized  in  an  age,  those  possessed  of  that 
power  will  be  imitated;  those  deficient  in  that  power  will  be  despised.  In 
consequence  an  unusual  quantity  of  that  power  will  be  developed  and  be  con- 
spicuous. Within  certain  limits  vigorous  and  elevated  thought  was  respected 
in  Elizabeth's  time  and,  therefore,  vigorous  and  elevated  thinkers  were  many.' 

Says  Jastrow : 

It  is  only  in  Utopia  that  condition  is  so  nicely  fitted  to  merit  that  success 
becomes  of  itself  significant.  A  mundane  people  must  first  itself  be  judged 
before  approving  the  type  of  men  to  whom  it  awards  success.^ 

In  proportion  as  a  nation  is  all  for  one  type  of  activity,  a  larger 
and  larger  proportion  of  successes  will  appear  in  that  speciality. 
There  will  be  many  prizes  in  that  quarter  and  some  mere  personages 
will  sit  in  the  seats  labeled  "for  the  great."  That  is  to  say,  the 
social  demand  will  much  outrun  the  supply  of  natural  variants  of 

'Quoted  in  Carver,  Sociology  and  Social  Progress,  p.  724.         '  Op.  cit,  p.  131. 


i6o  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

the  sort  suited  to  excel  in  that  type  of  activity.  Persons  of  great 
but  unspecialized  powers  will  also  be  swept  along  in  the  same 
current,  setting  to  the  common  goal,  and,  being  strong  swimmers, 
will  outdistance  rivals  marked  by  respectable  but  not  pre-eminent 
powers.  In  short,  when  a  nation  is  all  for  war,  or  all  for  poetry, 
or  all  for  commerce,  the  very  general  competition  ensuing  in 
those  lines  will  draft  into  service  all  the  pre-eminent  special  geniuses 
of  those  bents,  many  great  all-around  men,  and  even  many  men 
lacking  exceptional  talents  of  any  sort,  who,  nevertheless,  get 
captaincies  and  lieutenancies,  so  to  speak,  because  of  a  dearth  of 
officers.  When,  on  the  other  hand,  a  type  of  activity  is  despised  or 
ignored,  there  will  resort  thither  only  such  persons  of  specialized 
genius  as  combine  with  it  great  self-reliance  and  independence  of 
mind,  and  they  will  no  doubt  be  awarded  but  a  partial  recognition 
by  their  distracted  contemporaries;  they  will  be  sadly  under-rated 
just  as  many  who  achieve  a  moderate  success  in  the  prevaihng 
activity  will  be  much  over-rated.  Many  a  sensitive  soul  mil 
have  his  powers  chilled  by  the  prevailing  indifference  and  many  a 
mediocre  personality  will  bask  in  the  warmth  of  a  popular  esteem, 
which,  in  a  long  view  of  the  matter,  is,  in  one  century  or  another, 
indulgent  equally  of  parasites  and  poets,  athletes  and  authors, 
saints  and  soldiers,  creators  of  art  and  captains  of  industry.  But 
these  types  cannot  all  flourish,  each  in  its  peculiar  perfection,  at  one 
and  the  same  time. 

In  order  to  get  a  cross-section  of  contemporary  opinion  as  to 
what  t>pes  of  individuals  are  most  worthy  of  being  signalized,  I 
took  the  trouble  to  go  over  the  names  of  all  residents  of  the  state 
of  New  York  which  were  contained  in  the  edition  of  Who's  Who  in 
America  for  1910-11  and  to  compare  them  in  point  of  numbers  with 
the  total  membership  of  their  respective  crafts  enumerated  in  New 
York  in  the  census  taken  the  same  year  (1910).  I  selected  the 
following  occupations  as  representative  of  useful  effort  along  a 
variety  of  worthy  lines:  sea  captains,  members  of  fire  companies, 
locomotive  engineers,  life  savers,  carpenters,  cooks,  persons  em- 
ployed in  agriculture,  builders  and  building  contractors,  musicians 
and  music  teachers,  actors,  bankers  and  brokers,  architects,  physi- 
cians, clergymen,  lawyers  and  judges,  chemists,  artists,  journalists 


HEREDITY  AND  OPPORTUNITY  i6i 

of  all  sorts,  and  authors  of  all  sorts.  The  sophisticated  may  smile 
at  this  Ust,  for  quite  according  to  their  expectation  the  150,000 
good  people  engaged  in  the  first  six  of  these  occupations,  from  sea 
captains  to  carpenters  and  cooks,  did  not  secure  a  single  entry  in  the 
list  of  the  "conspicuously  successful  people"  of  the  state.  Of  the 
378,000  persons  engaged  in  agriculture,  one  in  every  75,000  was 
notably  successful,  netting  us  five  or  six  biographies.  Builders 
and  contractors  were  admitted  at  the  rate  of  i  to  2,000  so  engaged; 
musicians  and  music  teachers  at  the  rate  of  5  per  thousand;  actors, 
together  with  bankers  and  brokers  (for  both  professions  hold  out 
equal  prospects  of  biographical  mention),  11  per  thousand;  physi- 
cians, 16  per  thousand;  architects,  17  per  thousand;  chemists,  26 
per  thousand;  clergymen,  28  per  thousand;  lawyers  and  judges, 
32  per  thousand;  artists,  52  per  thousand;  journaHsts,  editors, 
reporters,  etc.,  71  per  thousand;  while,  wonderful  to  relate,  of 
1,442  males  and  females  constituting  the  tribe  of  writers,  no  less 
than  426  per  thousand,  or  nearly  43  per  cent,  were  admitted  to  this 
shrine  of  publicity. 

If  one  were  disposed  to  make  comparisons  it  would  appear, 
for  example,  that  if  one  of  two  brothers  should  engage  in  farming 
or  dairying,  while  the  other  became  a  newspaper  man,  the  chances 
of  the  former's  appearing  in  Who^s  Who  in  comparison  with  those 
of  the  latter  would  be  as  i  to  5,380.  A  banker  has  one  chance  to 
thirty-nine  enjoyed  by  a  writer.  A  physician  is  from  a  fourth  to 
a  fifth  as  likely  to  be  "conspicuously  successful"  as  a  newspaper 
man.  Even  the  lawyers  and  judges  have  but  one  chance  in  thirteen 
of  getting  into  the  Hall  of  Fame  when  pitted  against  the  authors. 

Such  then  is  Fame!  Those  who  interest  us,  whose  work  arrests 
our  eye,  whose  names  become  household  words,  whose  signed  con- 
tributions He  about  our  living-room  and  library  tables,  these  are 
in  a  fair  way  of  getting  a  modest  immortality  which,  after  all, 
bears  small  relation  perhaps  to  their  place  in  the  social  economy. 
Is  there  not  the  possibility  that  even  the  inspired  muse  of  history 
may  now  and  again  have  slipped  into  the  simple  and  natural 
expedients  of  the  profane  editors  of  Who's  Who  and  collated  the 
conspicuously  successful  under  the  impression  that  she  was  inform- 
ing us  with  reference  to  the  makers  of  history? 


THE  PRICE  SYSTEM  AND  SOCIAL  MANAGEMENT 


EDWIN  J.  ROSENBERG 
Assistant  Professor  of  Economics,  University  of  Idaho 

The  problems  of  reconstruction  are  commonly  thought  of  as  a 
matter  of  deep  concern  to  applied  economics,  and  so  they  are; 
but  more  recently  there  is  coming  to  exist  in  the  minds  of  those 
who  have  taken  the  matter  of  reconstruction  to  heart  a  feeling 
that  reconstruction  must  mean  more  than  a  mere  application  of 
the  present  economic  theory — that  it  is  going  to  call  into  question 
nearly  the  whole  of  that  theory;  that  the  first  step  in  reconstruc- 
tion will  be  not  to  apply  the  existing  theory,  but  to  develop  a 
theory  that  will  be  able  to  cope  with  the  problems  before  the  world. 

There  is  nothing  very  surprising  in  this  view  of  the  case.  It 
has  been  apparent  for  an  appreciable  term  of  years  that  there 
was  something  wrong  or  at  least  incomplete  in  economic  science  as 
it  stands.  With  adolescence  of  the  machine  regime  the  old  pohti- 
cal  economy  became  inadequate.  It  was  both  too  wide  and  too 
narrow.  On  the  one  hand,  it  failed  to  put  sufficient  emphasis  on 
the  business  phenomona,  so  that  practical  men  of  affairs  would 
have  none  of  it;  on  the  other  hand,  it  failed  to  go  deep  enough 
into  the  social  structure  to  be  in  any  sense  an  explanation  of  the 
economic  life  of  the  group,  or  to  allow  opportunity  for  the  develop- 
ment of  any  theory  of  group  welfare.  The  Marginal  Utility  School 
cut  economics  to  fit  the  business  facts,  and  so  made  of  it  a  glori- 
fied system  of  accountancy,  in  which  the  market  was  the  beginning 
and  the  end.  The  business  men  are  now  satisfied  or  should  be. 
Where  there  are  conflicts  between  the  economic  point  of  view  and 
the  business  point  of  view,  most  of  these  conflicts  are  mere  dis- 
putes over  terminology.  Thus  the  economist  is  likely  to  insist 
on  the  separation  of  the  factors  of  production  according  to  the 
traditional  method,  while  the  business  man  knows  (and  he  is 
entirely  right)  that  for  his  purposes  the  factors  of  production  can 

162 


THE  PRICE  SYSTEM  AND  SOCIAL  MANAGEMENT        163 

be  lumped  as  capital.  In  any  particular  contact  that  the  econ- 
omist makes  with  business  it  is  difficult  to  see  that  he  is  governed 
by  anything  differing  from  the  business  man's  theory.  But  eco- 
nomics is  a  social  science ;  and  the  market  is  only  one  among  scores 
of  social  institutions  both  antecedent  and  consequent  to  it. 
Slowly  the  light  has  been  dawning  that  if  economics  is  not  to  be 
hopelessly  discredited  as  a  social  science  it  must  adjust  itself  to 
social  facts.  To  go  back  to  political  economy  is  impossible;  to 
remain  a  mechanistic  exposition  of  large  scale  cost  accounting 
(that  is,  to  be  simply  "economics")  is  not  sufficient;  it  must 
become  in  some  real  sense,  a  science  of  social  economy. 

Among  those  who  speak  for  changes  of  a  drastic  sort  in 
economic  thinking  the  emphasis  varies ;  sometimes  it  is  a  demand 
for  a  new  theory  of  value;'  more  often,  recently,  it  is  a  demand 
for  changes  in  the  price  system.  The  two  sorts  of  demands  mean 
much  the  same  thing.  The  present  theory  of  value  is  entirely 
competent  to  deal  with  such  elements  of  value  as  profess  to  inter- 
pret demand  and  supply  as  market  facts.  If  value  theory  is 
enlarged  to  take  on  something  of  the  element  of  "social  value"  or 
if  the  price  system  is  modified  in  some  way  so  as  to  give  force  to 
value  elements  coming  from  outside  the  market,  the  results  to 
be  expected  will  be  substantially  the  same.  Normally  no  changes 
are  made  in  theory  until  the  felt  needs  become  powerful  enough 
to  change  the  institutions  that  are  explained  by  the  theory. 
Accordingly  the  more  interesting  phase  of  the  attack  on  eco- 
nomics as  it  stands  is  the  demand  for  the  abolition,  abrogation, 
or  drastic  modification  of  the  price  system.  An  additional  interest 
attaches  to  the  price  system  on  account  of  the  connection  with 
the  problem  of  war  and  peace,  and  the  manner  in  which  by  that 
fact  it  becomes  bound  up  with  the  entire  problem  of  reconstruc- 
tion.    Thus  Veblen:^ 

So  if  the  projectors  of  this  peace  at  large  are  in  any  degree  inclined  to 
seek  concessive  terms  on  which  the  peace  might  hopefully  be  made  enduring, 

■  B.  M.  Anderson,  Social  Value;  J.  H.  Hobson,  Work  and  Welfare. 

'  Veblen,  The  Nature  of  Peace,  p.  367.  The  quotation  of  a  single  sentence  can- 
not of  course  hope  to  be  convincing.  Nothing  less  than  the  whole  of  the  nature  of 
peace  can  bring  out  the  necessary  relation  between  economic  arrangements  and  the 


l64  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

it  should  evidently  be  part  of  their  endeavors  from  the  outset  to  put  events 
in  train  for  the  present  abatement  and  eventual  abrogation  of  the  rights 
of  ownership  and  of  the  price  system  in  which  those  rights  take  effect. 

There  are  others  of  the  current  economic  writers  who  either 
imply  or  express  much  the  same,  or  at  least  part  of  the  same, 
idea.  Without  exception,  however,  the  manner  in  which  the 
price  system  is  to  take  its  departure  is  left  to  the  imagination; 
the  way  in  which  '^ events  are  to  be  put  in  train,"  etc.,  is  not 
mentioned.  Probably  it  is  a  case  of  the  better  part  of  valor; 
yet  the  question  remains — a  typically  Veblenian  question,  embar- 
rassing in  the  extreme,  shouting  its  demand  for  solution  seemingly 
insoluble. 

It  is  not  by  any  chance  the  purpose  of  this  paper  to  attempt  an 
answer  to  the  question;  but  rather  to  speculate  on  the  nature 
and  possible  development  of  the  price  system  during  the  time 
that  remains  to  it.  That  the  price  system  will  be  eliminated  in 
anything  like  the  immediate  future,  seems  very  doubtful.  Pro- 
fessor Cooley  points  out  that  the  price  system  is  an  institution. 
"We  have  to  do  with  a  value  institution  or  process  far  transcend- 
ing in  reach  any  special  sort  of  value  and  participating  in  the 
most  diverse  phases  of  our  life.'"  It  has  taken  unto  itself  the 
fimction  of  dominating  and  relating  all  values,  whether  those 
values  be  of  the  economic,  the  aesthetic,  or  the  moral  type.  So 
widespread,  so  deeply  rooted  an  institution  will  not  soon  die. 
Reconstruction  may,  it  is  true,  entail  so  great  a  stress  as  to  achieve 
that  which  looks  impossible.  Barring  that  contingency,  the  price 
system  will  continue,  strengthening  its  hold,  cumulatively,  on 
social  life.  Allowing  for  the  most  optimistic  hopes  for  the  aboli- 
tion of  the  price  system,  it  must  have  a  place  in  our  reckoning  for 
yet  an  appreciable  time  and  during  that  time  the  changes  that 
the  price  system  is  making  within  itself  seem  of  considerable 
import  to  the  social  sciences,  particularly  with  reference  to  the 
engrossing  problem  of  post-war  reconstruction. 


possibility  of  a  lasting  peace.  The  arrangement  of  the  price  system  may  seem  to  be 
merely  an  uncalled-for  impertinence  unless  preceded  by  the  thorough  analysis  which 
no  one  probably  is  so  well  qualified  to  give  as  is  Mr.  Veblen.  The  reader  is  therefore 
referred  to  the  complete  work,  and  is  asked  temporarily  to  accept  the  assertion  that 
it  is  the  conclusion  just  quoted  toward  which  the  whole  argument  is  pointed. 

'  C.  H.  Cooley,  Social  Process,  p.  309. 


THE  PRICE  SYSTEM  AND  SOCIAL  MANAGEMENT        165 

The  price  system  is  not  to  be  considered  solely  as  an  institu- 
tion that  is  to  be  described  and  analyzed  in  terms  of  dollars  and 
cents.  The  price  system  must  be  taken  to  mean  the  market 
plus  the  allied  institutions  which  are  the  necessary  results  of  the 
price  system  as  well  as  the  sine  qua  non  of  the  development  of  the 
price  system  to  its  present  vigorous  state,  namely,  those  institu- 
tions which  for  lack  of  more  comprehensive  terms  may  be  called 
capitalism  and  modern  technology.  Capitalism  being  used  to 
describe  the  price  system  on  its  organization  side;  modern  tech- 
nology describing  it  on  its  production  side.  It  should  be  quite 
apparent  that  the  organization  as  well  as  the  production  of 
industry  is  on  a  basis  of  price,  and  that  any  other  basis  is  difficult 
if  not  impossible  to  imagine.  The  truth  of  the  matter  is  that  the 
price  system  in  all  of  its  ramifications — the  price  system  so  uni- 
versal in  its  dominance,  so  much  a  part  of  every  phase  of  social 
and  individual  life — is  too  big  a  concept  to  be  put  readily  under  a 
single  caption.  Perhaps  the  only  term  that  comes  close  to  the 
expression  of  the  whole  idea  is  modern  industrialism.  By  the 
term  industrialism  is  meant  all  of  the  industry,  not  the  type  of 
organization  alone,  nor  the  technique  alone  (nor  what  might  be 
implied  by  the  somewhat  wider  term  ''the  state  of  the  industrial 
arts")  nor  the  price  basis  alone;  but  all  of  these  elements  combin- 
ing and  reinforcing  each  other — that  is  industriahsm  as  used  here. 

Industrialism  like  any  other  institution  serves  itself.  But 
institutions  may  not  serve  themselves  alone;  they  must  also  be 
serviceable  to  the  larger  institution,  society,  in  which  the  particu- 
lar institution  has  its  being.  The  matter  might  be  put  more 
convincingly  in  the  negative.  Institutions  that  are  disserviceable 
to  the  social  whole  become  unfit  to  survive  and  tend  to  become 
eliminated.  Disserviceability  is  an  extreme  term,  just  as  absolute 
serviceabiHty  is  an  Utopian  dream.  Institutions,  as  a  matter  of 
fact,  fall  somewhere  between  the  two  limits;  that  is,  they  rep- 
resent in  greater  or  less  degree  the  universal  phenomenon  of  mal- 
adjustment. 

The  maladjustment  entailed  by  modern  industrialism  is 
scarcely  open  to  argument.  The  mobilization  of  industry  for 
war  was  a  particular  instance  in  which  the  necessity  of  adjust- 
ment to  the  social  responsibility  required  of  it  became  apparent. 


1 66  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

The  vast  changes  that  the  war  made  necessary  in  industrialism 
indicate  in  some  slight  degree  the  extent  by  which  that  institution 
falls  short  of  adjustment  to  the  society  that  it  is  to  serve.  Most 
of  the  adjustments  of  industrialism  to  war  needs  were  imposed 
from  without,  by  the  collective  social  will,  through  its  formal 
political  institutions.  Some  of  the  advantages  will  be  retained — 
not  so  much  because  of  the  governmental  command  but  because 
for  the  most  part  the  advantages  to  society  have  been  advantages 
to  industrialism  also.  Even  the  most  optimistic,  however,  does 
not  dare  to  believe  that  the  force  of  government  can  perpetuate 
in  peace  times  the  control  that  was  designed  and  accepted  in  the 
"win  the  war"  spirit.  Much  of  the  adjustment  of  industrialism 
to  social  needs  must  depend  on  industry  itself. 

It  will  be  desirable,  therefore,  to  take  a  somewhat  more  detailed 
view  of  modern  industralism  to  the  end  that  the  possibilities  in 
store  for  social  welfare  may  be  made  apparent.  Modern  indus- 
trialism presents  four  prominent  characteristics  or  phases:  (i) 
Modern  industrialism  on  its  technical  side  is  becoming  almost 
purely  a  machine  process.  (2)  It  is  tending  to  operate  on  a  basis 
of  large  units  of  plants  which  are  becoming  progressively  larger. 
(3)  Industrialism  in  becoming  capitalistic,  not  only  in  the  equip- 
ment sense  that  is  implied  by  the  foregoing,  but  also  in  the  invest- 
ment sense;  that  is  to  say,  industrialism  represents  large  blocks 
of  impersonal  wealth  gathered  from  scattered  sources  and  focused 
at  particular  points  through  the  mechanism  of  incorporation.  (4) 
Finally,  all  of  industrialism  is  measured  and  controlled  at  every 
step  by  the  pecuniary  calculus — every  action,  every  policy,  every 
development  conditioned  by  the  answer  to  the  question,  "What 
will  be  the  effect  on  the  balance  sheet  ? ' ' 

The  result  of  the  growth  of  the  machine  process  has  been  to 
call  attention  to  the  problem  of  management  as  affecting  labor. 
The  business  man  has  been  quick  to  see  that  the  machine  process 
involves  the  spending  of  vast  sums  for  fixed  charges,  that  is, 
expenses  that  go  on  quite  regardless  of  the  amount  of  product, 
hence  ultimately  regardless  of  the  income  that  the  business 
receives.  The  first  result  of  the  increasing  fixed  charges  is  a 
demand  for  the  highest  possible  mechanical  efficiency.     But  effi- 


THE  PRICE  SYSTEM  AND  SOCIAL  MANAGEMENT        167 

ciency  of  the  machine  is  all  but  useless  without  efficiency  of  the 
men  who  work  the  machine.  Sooner  or  later  a  situation  typically 
as  follows  finds  its  way  into  the  calculations  of  the  cost  accountant. 

Cost  of  1,000  Units  of  Product 

Interest  charge  on  $20,000  machine                .        .  $4.00 

Depreciation  charge  on  $20,000  machine       .        .  3 .  50 

Rent  charge  for  floor  space  occupied       .        .        .  2 .  00 

Other  overhead  charges,  light,  heat,  management  6.00 

Material,  1,000  units 10.00 

Labor 2.00 

Total $27.50 

The  cost  accountant  or  the  efficiency  expert  finds  that  the  labor 
used  in  the  above  process  is  only  30,  or  40,  or  50  per  cent  efficient. 
The  conclusion  must  occur  to  him:  "If  I  can  increase  the  effi- 
ciency of  the  workingman  to  something  approaching  i copper  cent, 
I  can  get  1,500  units  surely,  and  possibly  2,000  or  2,500  units  with 
the  same  equipment  I  have  and  with  proportionate  increases  in 
only  the  item  of  material,  and  a  small  increase  in  the  labor  item 
(the  latter  being  the  first  prerequisite  of  higher  efficiency  that 
comes  to  be  thought  of).  Probably  the  accountant  would  go  into 
the  matter  in  somewhat  greater  detail,  and  with  a  finer  discrim- 
ination in  terminology.  That  is,  however,  beside  the  point;  the 
situation  substantially  as  outlined  is  not  only  of  frequent  occur- 
rence, but  it  is  becoming  an  inevitable  consequence  of  the  machine 
process  wherever  the  machine  process  has  reached  a  certain  ful- 
ness of  development.  Likewise  the  conclusion  that  the  manage- 
ment draws  from  the  situation  is  inevitable;  so  much  so  that  the 
conclusions  are  frequently  expressed  as  slogans:  ''Cheap  labor  is 
too  expensive  to  use."  "Efficiency  is  the  watchword,"  etc.  The 
attention  of  the  management  becomes  riveted  on  the  human 
equipment  of  the  plant,  precisely  that  phase  of  the  industrial 
policy  that  is  fraught  with  tremendous  possibilities  for  good  or 
ill  to  the  working  man,  and,  overflowing  the  immediate  working- 
man,  to  the  whole  social  group. 

It  must  not  be  assumed  that  the  relation  of  large  fixed  plants 
and  the  demand  for  efficiency  is  an  isolated  and  simple  causal 


l68  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

sequence.  At  any  time  the  business  end  of  the  plant,  that  is, 
the  sales  organization,  may  step  in  and  nullify  the  proceedings. 
There  is  a  limitation  on  efficiency  always  in  the  background;  not 
how  much  can  be  produced,  but  how  much  can  be  sold  at  a  profit 
is  the  final  arbiter  of  what  will  be  produced.  There  can  be  no 
reasonable  doubt  that  the  price  system  sets  in  train  a  retardation 
of  the  production  of  commodities  of  greater  or  less  seriousness, 
and,  moreover,  that  this  retardation  although  acting  through  the 
management  of  owners  is  entirely  beyond  their  control.  To  apply 
these  considerations  to  the  individual  plant,  the  manager  may 
fear  to  produce  the  two  thousand  units  of  product  lest  that  may 
mean  the  selling  of  the  product  for  a  price  so  low  as  to  eliminate 
profits.  Offsetting  this  fear  is  the  hope  that  he,  and  not  his 
competitor,  may  be  able  to  dispose  of  all  of  his  own  product  at 
the  present  price,  that  is,  that  by  increased  efiiciency  he  may 
be  able  to  get  something  of  a  differential  profit  or  monopoly 
advantage.  All  in  all,  there  is  a  certain  undeniable  force  in  the 
machine  process  which  demands  efficiency.  No  better  evidence 
of  this  tendency  should  be  desired  than  the  writings  and  argu- 
ments of  the  scientific  managers.  Any  of  their  current  works 
will  be  seen  to  be  made  up,  not  only  so  far  as  indicated  by  mere 
bulk,  but,  more  in  point,  by  the  importance  attached  to  the  vari- 
ous phases  of  management,  largely  of  discussions  of  the  efficiency 
of  labor  and  the  methods  by  which  it  may  be  increased. 

Now  the  development  of  human  efficiency  in  industry  has 
possibilities  that  are  of  tremendous  social  consequence.  In  a 
word,  efficiency  in  industry  first  and  last  hits  every  point  in  a 
tangled  bundle  of  relations  characterized  by  the  term,  "the  labor 
problem."  This  is  quite  evident  in  the  large  view  of  things. 
The  labor  problem  while  meaning  something  more  or  less  different 
to  each  of  the  three  interested  classes,  employer,  laborer,  and 
society,  means  at  least  one  thing  to  all,  namely,  that  so  long  as 
any  portion  of  the  labor  problem  remains  in  the  minds  of  any  of 
the  three  classes,  in  so  far  is  the  existence  of  a  source  of  ineffi- 
ciency proved.  Do  the  employers  beheve  that  labor  presents 
a  problem  to  them?  Are  there  strikes,  is  the  labor  turnover 
large,  is  there  soldiering  or  sabotage?     These  are  but  particular 


THE  PRICE  SYSTEM  AND  SOCIAL  MANAGEMENT        169 

ways  of  expressing  the  belief  in  the  existence  of  inefficiency.  Are 
there  unfulfilled  demands  of  the  workers?  Are  the  hours  too 
long,  the  pay  too  short,  the  factories  not  sanitary  or  safe?  If 
any  of  these  are  felt  by  the  laborers  as  matters  to  be  remedied, 
then  the  contingencies  regarded  by  the  management  as  symptoms 
of  inefficiency  and  feared  for  their  effect  on  the  balance  sheet 
will  inevitably  be  present.  The  labor  problem  is  synonymous 
with  inefficiency.  The  manager  caught  in  the  toils  of  the  price 
calculus,  more  firmly  perhaps  than  any  other  participant  in  indus- 
try, must  remove  inefficiency  because  inefficiency  is  unprofitable. 
The  manager  turns  his  thoughts  resolutely  toward  a  solution 
of  the  labor  problem. 

Needless  to  say,  there  are  solutions  and  solutions  of  the  labor 
problem.  What  might  be  an  acceptable  solution  to  the  manage- 
ment may  not  appeal  to  the  worker;  and  even  if  a  solution  is 
acceptable  to  both  management  and  workers,  society  has  certain 
ideals,  more  or  less  inarticulate  at  present,  but  which  will  some- 
time reach  definiteness  and  which  will  demand  a  hearing.  It  is 
of  course  the  social  demands  that  are  eventually  to  be  reckoned 
with  most  seriously,  containing  as  they  will  all  the  elements  of 
any  class  demands.  It  is  essentially  the  thesis  of  the  present 
paper  to  set  forth  the  mutuality  of  the  social  and  the  industrial 
ideals.  To  that  end  it  is  necessary  to  bring  out  for  examination 
in  greater  detail  the  other  characteristics  of  industriaHsm  men- 
tioned previously  as  part  and  parcel  of  the  price  system,  namely, 
the  size  of  the  industrial  unit  and  the  corporate,  investment 
nature  of  their  organization.  No  particular  effort  will  be  made 
to  develop  the  niceties  of  causal  sequence.  Industrial  units  could 
not  have  become  large  without  the  machine  process;  the  machine 
process  could  not  have  developed  without  large  units  coming  into 
the  case  sooner  or  later.  Corporations  can  be  the  normal  type  of 
organization  only  in  an  industry  made  up  of  large  units,  and  large 
units  demand  corporations  as  their  logical  method  of  administra- 
tion. It  is  the  large,  impersonal,  corporate  business,  making 
extensive  use  of  the  machine  process,  that  comes  most  fully  under 
the  direction  of  the  price  system.  It  is  the  same  sort  of  industrial 
unit  that  has  exerted  upon  it  pressure  for  a  solution  of  the  labor 


lyo  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

problem.  Is  this  a  coincidence?  Or  is  there  a  causal  relation 
between  the  price  system  and  the  solution  of  labor  problems? 
If  it  can  be  shown  that  the  price  system  demands  the  right  kind 
of  efficiency,  it  may  do  much  toward  a  solution  of  labor  problems. 
To  complete  the  argument  it  remains  necessary  to  show  that 
the  modern  industrial  unit  under  the  lash  of  the  price  calculus 
does  make  for  efficiency  of  the  right  sort — that  is,  efficiency  based 
upon  the  long-time,  rather  than  the  short-time,  view. 

An  individual  business  cannot  look  farther  than  the  individual 
who  owns  it.  Personal  idiosyncrasies,  bias,  likes  and  dislikes  will 
determine  the  policies  of  this  owner  in  his  social  capacity.  Allow- 
ing for  these  things  the  pecuniary  interest  will  prevail  but  invari- 
ably it  will  be  the  immediate  pecuniary  interest.  Consider  a 
concrete  instance  of  the  individual  owner  in  his  social  capacity. 
What  is  his  interest  in  the  conservation  of  labor?  Comparing 
his  labor  needs  with  the  total  supply  of  labor,  he  is  struck  most 
of  all  with  the  tremendous  amount  of  labor  available.  The  belief 
that  he  has  but  to  use  the  labor  he  wants  is  very  natural.  The 
result  is  exploitation,  abated  only  by  the  humanitarian  considera- 
tions or  social  mandates  that  come  wholly  from  without  his 
business  life. 

The  corporate  form  of  ownership  makes  short  shrift  of  the 
personal  element  in  management.  This  is  particularly  evident 
where  the  business  is  large  and  the  stockholders  numerous.  No 
one  stockholder  can  step  in  and  make  demands  as  to  the 
policy  of  the  management  nor  has  he  the  knowledge  or  the 
desire  to  do  so.  One  point  of  contact  and  one  only  remains 
to  him  and  to  his  associates — the  pecuniary.  The  management 
must  produce  returns;  this  is  the  extent  of  the  demands 
that  the  stockholders  may  make.  Thus  is  the  management 
given  the  first  great  aid  of  scientific  procedure,  incentive,  open- 
mindedness,  a  curiosity  to  test  proposed  policies  for  their  effect 
on  the  balance  sheet,  a  necessity  for  looking  far  afield,  per- 
haps, for  the  ideas  of  management  in  similar  organizations. 
Moreover,  the  modern  corporation  is  beginning  to  take  on  the 
qualities  of  an  institution.  Stockholders  may  die  or  sell  out; 
the  corporation  continues.     Employees  may  come  and  go;    the 


THE  PRICE  SYSTEM  AND  SOCIAL  MANAGEMENT        171 

business  persists.  Patrons  may  change;  the  institution  lives  on* 
No  one  group  nor  all  of  the  groups  of  human  beings  most  inti- 
mately connected  with  the  corporation  can  be  said  to  be  the 
equivalent  of  that  corporation.  The  corporation  is  not  on  the 
other  hand  identical  with  the  material  equipment,  either  in  a 
value  sense  or  in  a  social  sense.  The  one  single  fact  that  comes 
nearest  to  an  explanation  of  a  corporation  is  the  investment  of  a 
certain  value  in  pecuniary  terms — a  pecuniary  force  set  loose 
in  the  world  subject  to  the  few  limitations  put  upon  it  by  the 
institutions  among  which  it  operates  and  the  primary  limitations 
invoked  by  those  who  gathered  the  investments  together.  It  is 
evident  that  a  picture  of  a  corporation  gained  merely  from  a  read- 
ing of  its  balance  sheet  must  be  very  incomplete.  The  investment 
fact,  the  material  equipment,  the  personnel  of  the  management, 
employees,  officers,  and  patrons  must  all  be  considered  and  then 
there  is  left  that  something,  beyond,  which  is  characteristic  of 
institutions. 

It  cannot  be  denied  that  corporation  stockholders  will  demand 
immediate  returns  and  that  the  delicate  mechanism  of  the  stock 
exchange  will  enable  them  to  enforce  their  demand,  but  if  the 
corporation  is  an  institution  having  a  life  and  entity  of  its  own 
and,  what  is  more  important,  an  eternal  lifetime  to  look  forward 
to,  these  demands  must  always  be  tempered  by  the  long-time 
view.  Consider  for  illustration  the  purely  physical  fact  of  main- 
tenance of  the  material  equipment.  If  we  take  the  evidence  of 
the  accountants  and  business  executives,  much  of  the  depreci- 
ation of  a  plant  is  entirely  invisible.  Barring  the  matter  of  obso- 
lescence, the  plant  might  continue  without  replacement  for  five, 
ten,  or  twenty  years,  without  affecting  its  mechanical  fitness. 
Nevertheless,  the  accountant  insists  with  evident  propriety  that 
a  portion  of  the  ostensible  income  must  be  held  against  the 
demands  of  the  stockholders  to  meet  the  deferred  day  of  reckon- 
ing. It  is  evident  that  this  sort  of  reasoning  perpetuates  itself, 
for  when  the  twenty-year  period  is  ended,  the  thought  of  the 
corporation  has  gone  forward  to  another  distant  point.  Always 
the  plant,  physical  or  intangible,  the  plant  as  a  going  institution 
or  as  a  fixed  investment  must  be  kept  intact.     Thus  the  corporation 


172  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

gets  into  the  habit  of  taking  the  long-time  view.^  Now  the 
efficiency  engineers,  reasoning  from  the  analogy  of  the  machine 
technique,  have  come  to  regard  the  human  equipment  of  the 
plant  as  vastly  important.  What  more  logical  than  that  the 
human  equipment  should  be  kept  intact,  should  be  conserved  for 
the  benefit  of  the  corporation  ?  The  machine  process  calls  atten- 
tion to  the  necessity  for  making  the  employees  efficient.  The 
corporate,  investment,  large  scale  characteristic  of  business  units 
determines  the  period  during  which  this  efficiency  is  to  operate. 
It  becomes  efficiency  for  the  indefinite  future,  not  for  the 
immediate  day. 

Now  the  difference  between  social  needs  and  individual  needs 
lies  largely  in  the  insistence  of  the  former  on  a  long-time  view. 
There  is  a  constantly  growing  body  of  evidence  that  points  to  a 
tendency  of  industrial  plants  to  measure  their  needs  with  refer- 
ence to  a  long-time  standard.  The  industrial  units  are  becoming 
large  enough  and  impersonal  enough  to  make  the  long-time  view 
profitable.  Consider,  for  example,  the  simple  matter  of  the  tenure 
of  employment  of  skilled  or  semi-skilled  laborers.  There  is  no 
longer  any  reasonable  doubt  in  the  minds  of  employers  that  it 
is  a  wild  extravagance  to  be  continually  hiring  and  training  new 
workers.  The  conclusion  of  these  employers  is  very  evident— 
"  Get  your  employees  young,  train  them  well,  keep  them  through 
the  whole  of  their  working  lives,  and  make  adequate  provision  for 
them  when  old  age  makes  retirement  necessary" — rather  a  large 
step  toward  the  recognition  of  social  ideals.  A  part  of  what 
commonly  goes  under  the  name  of  "welfare  work"  is  a  further 
step  in  the  same  direction.     Some  welfare  work  is  merely  a  substi- 

'  Almost  any  one  of  the  transcontinental  railroads  presents  a  striking  case  in 
point.  Evidence  seems  to  show  without  much  doubt  that  the  reason  why  railroad 
investments  as  compared  with  other  business  do  not  pay  sufficiently  large  dividends 
in  spite  of  the  clamor  of  stockholders  is  due,  frequently,  to  the  inordinately  large 
amounts  spent  for  improvements  of  plants.  This  may  amount  to  nothing  more 
or  less  than  an  evaporation  of  water  from  the  stock;  nevertheless  the  conflict  between 
the  immediate  demands  of  the  stockholders  and  the  vital  needs  of  the  corporation  is 
a  real  conflict  in  which  the  stockholders  seem  to  be  losing  out.  A  more  obvious 
instance  of  the  long-time  view  as  shown  by  railroad  corporations  is  the  large  amount 
of  money  spent  for  developing  and  colonizing  new  territory  or  the  policy  of  forest 
protection  and  planting  on  the  railroad,  looking  to  the  benefit  of  the  road  fifty  or 
seventy-five  years  in  the  future. 


THE  PRICE  SYSTEM  AND  SOCIAL  MANAGEMENT        173 

tute  for  wages  or  other  claims  wrongfully  withheld  from  employees, 
or  so  regarded  by  them.  The  justice  of  the  charge  is  immaterial; 
the  result  in  any  case  is  failure;  and  if  welfare  work  is  a  failure, 
it  is  thereby  unprofitable.  Real  welfare  work  is  profitable;  among 
the  hundreds  of  industrial  plants  that  have  earnestly  tried  it, 
there  is  not  a  dissenting  voice.  Real  welfare  work  means  the 
doing  of  something  for  the  employees  or  employees'  families  that 
the  employees  would  find  it  difficult  or  impossible  to  do  for  them- 
selves, even  if  given  more  wages.  Welfare  work  is  successful 
(therefore  profitable)  in  the  degree  in  which  it  is  social. 

Unfortunately  there  comes  a  time  in  the  life  of  most  industrial 
plants  when  the  desire  to  engage  in  socially  useful  welfare  work 
has  to  be  surpressed.  It  may  be  that  the  plant  is  too  small  to 
permit  of  extensive  long-time  investments,  or  that  the  investment 
might  result  in  a  gratuitous  benefit  to  competing  plants.  Thus 
an  industrial  corporation  might  see  the  profitableness  (eventually) 
of  a  recreation  park  for  the  use  of  the  entire  community;  yet  if 
the  corporation's  employees  do  not  make  up  a  substantial  portion 
of  such  commvmity,  the  park  will  not  be  established,  or  if  estab- 
lished, will  not  be  thrown  open  to  the  entire  community.  The 
existence  today  of  hundreds  of  industrial  plants  that  are  complete 
communities,  and  the  probability  of  the  increase  of  such  situations, 
removes  the  last  barrier  to  the  entrance  of  ideals  into  industry. 

It  will  be  objected,  no  doubt,  that  a  certain  corporation,  "The 
United  States  Steel  Company,"  not  only  has  plants  that  consti- 
tute entire  conomunities,  but  that  some  of  these  communities  were 
deHberately  planned  by  the  corporation,  that  in  this  planning  the 
corporation  had  unlimited  opportunities  to  promote  the  social 
well-being  of  the  future  communities,  and,  in  the  main,  passed 
them  by.  Such  is  indeed  the  superficial  interpretation  of  the 
''steel  cities" — superficial  only  because  the  "steel  cities"  show  a 
decided  and  steady  tendency  of  their  maker  to  put  more  emphasis 
on  the  larger  social  needs.'  It  is  quite  within  the  range  of  prob- 
abilities that  future  steel  cities  will  leave  nothmg  to  be  desired 
in  the  way  of  scientific  planning  for  the  convenience,  comfort, 

•See  Graham  Taylor's  Satellite  Cities  for  an  illuminating  description  of  these 
and  other  industrial  cities. 


174  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

and  health  of  their  mhabitants,  for  such   foresighted  investment 
will  pay  large  dividends. 

The  logical  outcome  of  an  insistence  on  efficiency  of  labor  is 
a  demand  on  the  part  of  industrial  managers  for  social  efficiency. 
That  the  managers,  even  those  calling  themselves  scientific,  have 
not  realized  the  size  of  the  job  they  have  contracted  for,  needs 
no  documentation  here.  The  present  failure  of  scientific  manage- 
ment is  evident  on  the  face  of  things,  from  the  fact  that  labor 
troubles  are  painfully  frequent  and  extensive,  that  scientific  man- 
agement has  met  with  a  lukewarm  reception  generally  and  hostility 
frequently,  that  scientific  management  has  not  yet  discovered  the 
need  for  retention  of  labor  unionism  and  the  possibilities  for  its 
utilization.  Scientific  management  is  in  its  infancy.  If  it  develops 
its  potentiality,  its  program  must  be  in  its  general  outlines  some- 
what as  follows: 

1.  Sanitary  conditions  in  working  places  must  be  determined 
not  by  eliminating  features  that  are  unsanitary  but  by  construc- 
tive and  scientific  calculation  of  what  is  positively  good.  Indus- 
trial policy  on  this  phase  of  the  problem  is  relatively  far  advanced, 
that  is  to  say,  in  the  progressive  units;  the  actual  achievement 
is  ahead  of  the  formal  or  legal  demands  of  society. 

2.  There  must  be  scientific  determination  of  the  hours  of 
employment  and  the  rate  of  pay,  including  a  workable  scheme 
whereby  these  and  similar  matters  may  be  considered  by  both 
the  employer  and  the  employee. 

3.  There  must  be  scientific  determination  of  the  physical, 
mental,  and  psychic  fitness  of  the  workers  for  their  position. 

4.  An  educational  plant  must  be  put  in  operation  within  the 
industrial  plant,  and  this  educational  plant  must  be  designed  as 
much  for  the  rounding  out  of  the  individual  lives  of  the  employees 
as  for  the  immediate  needs  of  the  plant. 

5.  There  must  be  maintenance  of  beneficial  living  conditions 
for  the  working  force.  Initially  this  will  concern  itself  with  hous- 
ing conditions,  but  sooner  or  later  it  must  overflow  from  that 
beginning  to  such  large  items  of  social  welfare  as  city  planning,  a 
beautification  of  surroundings,  and  the  like,  with  the  constant 
care  that  these  social  matters  are  not  worked  out  by  anything 


THE  PRICE  SYSTEM  AND  SOCIAL  MANAGEMENT        175 

savoring  of  paternalism — difficult,  to  be  sure,  but  part  of  the 
problem  nevertheless. 

6.  There  must  be  special  protection  to  motherhood  and 
infancy,  for  the  industry  must  look  ahead  to  the  next  generation 
of  workers. 

7.  There  must  be  conservation  and  development  of  the  morale 
of  the  community  of  workers,  including  provision  for  recreation 
and  the  like,  welfare  work  of  a  real  sort;  and  more  than  any  one 
thing,  the  maintenance  of  the  right  attitude  between  employer 
and  employee. 

Morale  is  psychic,  not  physical.  The  problem  of  morale  is  not 
to  be  solved  by  science  alone,  but  only  by  science  coupled  with 
imagination.  This  is  the  really  big  problem  of  management. 
Most  of  the  other  essentials  can  be  standarized,  not  this.  It 
may  be  that  industry  will  have  to  develop  a  new  type  of  manager, 
a  man  in  whom  the  social  needs  of  his  community  will  find  as 
quick  response  as  the  fluctuation  of  the  balance  sheet. ^ 

It  must  be  remembered  that  a  program  such  as  that  sketched 
above  will  be  one  that  industrial  enterprises  will  be  loath  to 
embrace  in  its  entirety.  Even  the  enterprises  that  are  purest  in 
their  pecuniary  control  will  retain  some  vestige  of  the  traditional 
ideas  of  management  and  will  moreover  be  influenced  in  the 
same  direction  by  policy  of  business  units  not  completely  domi- 
nated by  the  price  system.  On  the  other  hand,  it  must  be  remem- 
bered that  all  the  other  institutions  of  social  life  will  continue 
to  develop  along  with  the  development  of  the  price  system  and 
will  come  to  have  more  force  than  they  have  at  present.  Accord- 
ingly government,  art,  social  will  in  the  large  sense,  will  tend  to 
reinforce  the  development  of  industry  in  a  direction  of  social 
utility. 

'  The  public  utterances  of  John  D.  Rockefeller,  Jr.,  are  perhaps  to  be  taken  with 
a  grain  of  salt;  nevertheless  they  show,  if  nothing  more,  the  sensitivity  to  pubUc 
demand.  At  the  recent  business  conference  at  Atlantic  City  Mr.  Rockefeller  said 
inter  alia:  "I  beUeve  that  the  purpose  of  industry  is  quite  as  much  to  advance  social 

well-being  as  material  prosperity I  believe  that  every  man  is  entitled  to  an 

opportunity  to  earn  a  living,  to  fair  wages,  to  reasonable  hours  of  work,  and  proper 
working  conditions,  to  a  decent  home,  to  the  opportunity  to  play,  to  learn,  to  worship 
and  to  love,  as  well  as  to  toil,  and  the  responsibility  rests  as  heavily  upon  industry 
as  upon  government  or  society,  to  see  that  these  conditions  and  opportunities  prevail." 


THE  COURT  AND  THE  DELINQUENT  CHILD 

HERBERT  M.  BAKER  * 

Judge  of  the  County  Court  of  Weld  County,  Colorado 


The  increasing  complexities  of  modern  life  have  placed  upon 
the  shoulders  of  all,  adult  and  child  alike,  similarly  increasing 
responsibilities.  Acts  that  were  indifferent  in  years  gone  by  are 
now  harmful.  The  bare  competition  to  live  demands  a  higher 
culture  and  more  specialized  knowledge.  The  opportunities  to 
derive  a  Hvelihood  directly  from  natural  resources  are  rapidly 
diminishing,  and  the  children  of  today,  the  voters  of  tomorrow, 
will  be  forced  to  a  struggle  for  existence  in  a  more  artificial  atmos- 
phere created  by  the  intricate  civilization  of  science  and  city  life. 
Even  the  rural  communities  are  impressed  by  new  standards  of 
living.  The  isolation  and  primitiveness  of  the  farm  of  a  generation 
ago  have  passed  into  the  limbo  of  forgotten  things. 

New  and  ever-changing  duties  and  responsibilities  have  com- 
pelled mankind  so  far  as  possible  to  adjust  itself  thereto.  Many 
have  been  lost  by  the  wayside,  and  they  present  the  human  elements 
of  our  constantly  shifting  social  problems  which  require  continual 
variations  of  methods  to  meet  them. 

Among  the  imperfections  which  during  the  last  twenty  years 
have  most  insistently  thrust  themselves  upon  the  attention  of 
social  workers  is  the  failure  to  conserve  sufficiently  the  well-being 
of  children.  Particularly,  old  ideas  have  proved  to  be  inadequate 
in  the  correction  of  delinquents.  Out  of  the  obvious  necessity 
of  fitting  our  social,  and  more  particularly  our  legal,  institutions 
to  their  requirements  has  developed  what  we  know  as  the  ''Juvenile 
Court." 

The  need  was  seen  long  before  the  cure  was  discovered,  and 
those  more  fully  aware  of  the  evil  attempted  its  eradication  without 
any  clear  conception  of  its  true  character.  Rules  of  legal  procedure 
and  practice,  particularly  in  matters  of  a  criminal  nature,  were 
designed  for  adults  and  not  for  children.     Jurists  having  juris- 

176 


THE  COURT  AND  THE  DELINQUENT  CHILD  177 

diction  of  the  causes  of  children  were  among  the  first  to  discern 
and  deplore  the  impotency  of  the  courts  to  deal  with  them.  Men 
and  women,  more  earnest  than  competent,  sought  to  produce  order 
out  of  chaos  by  establishing  children's  courts  and  evolving  a  system 
of  jurisprudence  applicable  to  juveniles.  Their  efforts  have  resulted 
in  making  confusion  worse  confounded.  Laws  have  been  enacted 
more  through  sentiment  than  reason,  the  courts  have  been  poorly 
organized,  and  the  judges  usually  have  not  been  qualified.  But 
some  good,  not  to  be  underestimated,  has  resulted  in  that  it  has 
brought  to  the  consciousness  of  people  generally  the  necessity  of 
the  enlightened  treatment  of  children  guilty  of  anti-social  conduct. 
The  way  has  also  been  opened  for  a  closer  investigation  of  child- 
hood's needs,  and  by  reason  of  the  very  fact  that  the  courts  have 
proved  unequal  to  their  tasks,  it  may  now  be  seen  with  compara- 
tive clarity  what  the  prerequisites  to  the  successful  control  of 
recalcitrant  children  are. 

We  know  that  each  case  is  an  individual  study  and  that  general 
laws  applicable  to  all  are  few  indeed.  We  know  that  before  any 
rational  method  for  the  correction  of  a  child  may  be  found,  thorough 
and  scientific  investigation  of  his  environment,  his  physical  and 
mental  condition  must  be  made,  and  all  facts  of  heredity  and  birth 
must  be  in  the  possession  of  someone  capable  of  analyzing  and 
interpreting  them.  Juvenile  courts,  in  order  to  meet  these  require- 
ments, have  surrounded  themselves  with  corps  of  psychologists, 
aHenists,  physicians,  probation  officers,  and  what  not,  for  the  pur- 
pose of  acquainting  themselves  with  all  of  the  ascertainable  facts 
that  might  be  construed  to  be  causative  factors  of  delinquency. 
They  have  attempted  to  establish  human  laboratories  where  each 
child  is  placed  under  the  microscope  of  science,  to  discover  even 
the  most  minute  variation  from  the  normal.  But  even  with  all 
of  this  paraphernalia,  they  have  found  themselves  unable  to  dispose 
of  any  single  case  to  the  certain  satisfaction  of  those  most  interested 
in  it.  Consequently,  juvenile  courts  are  held  in  suspicion  by  the 
layman,  in  contempt  by  the  lawyer,  and  regarded  with  a  sense  of 
weakness  by  the  judge.  The  only  conclusion  anyone  familiar  with 
even  the  best  of  them  can  reach  is  that  in  providing  machinery 
for  the  reformation  of  incorrigible  children,  they  have  failed. 


178  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

The  reasons  for  this  failure  are  many.  Among  them  are  the 
poorly  conceived  laws,  inadequate  equipment  both  personal  and 
material,  and  incompetent  judges;  but  by  far  the  most  salient 
reason  is  that  courts  are  not  fundamentally  adapted  to  this  work. 
It  is  not  the  legitimate  province  of  a  court  to  investigate  the  habits 
of  an  alleged  delinquent  to  determine  whether  or  not  he  should  be 
prosecuted,  thus  pre-judging  before  trial  his  guilt  or  innocence; 
and  much  less  should  it  be  its  duty,  after  conviction  and  suspension 
of  sentence,  to  supervise  his  conduct,  or  to  determine  whether  or 
not  he  should  be  brought  again  into  court,  thus  making  the  judge 
the  complaining  witness,  the  prosecutor,  the  jury,  and  the  execu- 
tioner. Yet,  such  are  the  duties  imposed  upon  Ihe  juvenile  courts 
by  all  the  "children's  codes"  in  the  United  States,  so  far  as  I  know. 
Under  the  old  belief  that  a  convicted  defendant  should  be  punished 
because  he  had  broken  the  law,  the  rendition  of  judgment  in  a 
criminal  case,  specifying  the  kind  and  degree  of  punishment,  was 
just  as  truly  a  function  of  the  court  as  entering  a  money  judgment 
in  a  civil  action;  because  under  this  theory  the  sentence  was  merely 
retribution  to  the  state  against  the  criminal  who  had  injured  it, 
in  the  same  way  that  a  money  judgment  was  retribution  by  a 
defendant  to  the  plaintiff  whom  he  had  damaged.  But  as  soon 
as  we  vary  from  this  principle  and  consider  the  treatment  of 
deHnquents  from  the  standpoint  of  their  social  rehabilitation,  we 
are  departing  from  the  realms  of  legal  procedure  to  those  of  govern- 
mental poUcy.  Lawyers  and  judges  rightfully  resent  this  institu- 
tionalization of  courts.  The  true  function  of  a  court  is  to  determine 
judicially  the  facts  at  issue  before  it;  or,  in  criminal  matters,  the 
guilt  or  innocence  of  persons  charged  with  crime.  Investigations 
of  the  lives,  environments,  or  heredity  of  delinquents,  the  injfliction 
of  punishment,  and  the  supervision  of  probation  institutionalize  the 
courts  and  are  repugnant  to  every  tenet  of  the  science  of  law. 

In  the  report  of  the  proceedings  of  a  conference  on  child  welfare 
standards  recently  held  under  the  auspices  of  the  Federal  Children's 
Bureau,  is  found  the  following: 

Every  locality  should  have  available  a  court  organization  providing  for 
separate  hearings  of  children's  cases,  a  special  method  of  detention  for  children, 
adequate. investigation  for  every  case,  provision  for  supervision  or  probation 


THE  COURT  AND  THE  DELINQUENT  CHILD  179 

by  trained  officers,  and  a  system  for  recording  and  filing  social  as  well  as  legal 
information.  In  dealing  with  children  the  procedure  should  be  under  chancery 
jurisdiction,  and  juvenile  records  should  not  stand  as  criminal  records  against 
the  children.  Whenever  possible  such  administrative  duties  as  child-placing 
and  relief  should  not  be  required  of  the  juvenile  court,  but  should  be  adminis- 
tered by  existing  agencies  provided  for  that  purpose,  or  in  the  absence  of 
such  agencies,  special  provision  should  be  made  therefor;  nor  should  cases  of 
dependency  or  destitution  in  which  no  questions  of  improper  guardianship  or 
final  and  conclusive  surrender  of  guardianship  are  involved,  be  instituted  in 
juvenile  courts. 

The  juvenile  victims  of  sex  offenses  are  without  adequate  protection  against 
unnecessary  publicity  and  further  corruption  in  ouf'  courts.  To  safeguard 
them,  the  jurisdiction  of  the  juvenile  court  should  be  extended  to  deal  with  adult 
sex  offenders  against  children,  and  all  safeguards  of  that  court  be"  accorded  to 
their  victims. 

In  all  cases  of  adoption  of  children,  the  court  should  make  a  full  inquiry 
into  all  the  facts  through  its  own  visitor  or  through  some  other  unbiased  agency, 
before  awarding  the  child's  custod3\' 

While  this  report  does  recommend  that  "whenever  possible" 
administrative  duties  concerning  the  placing  of  dependent  or 
neglected  children  should  not  be  placed  upon  the  court,  it  empha- 
sizes the  duty  of  the  court  to  make  ''adequate  investigation  for 
every  case,  provision  for  supervision  or  probation  by  trained  officers, 
and  a  system  for  recording  and  filing  social  as  well  as  legal  informa- 
tion," for  delinquents.  In  order  to  justify  this  recommendation 
it  specifies  that  in  "deahng  with  children  the  proceedings  should  be 
under  the  chancery  jurisdiction,  and  juvenile  records  should  not 
stand  as  criminal  records  against  the  children." 

All  of  this  means  that  a  child  who  breaks  a  law  is  not  a  law- 
breaker, that  a  crime  is  not  a  crime  when  committed  by  a  juvenile, 
and  that  so  far  as  children  are  concerned  things  are  not  at  all  what 
they  seem.  It  is  merely  an  attempt  to  make  a  rose  smell  sweeter 
by  some  other  name.  This  fiction  that  has  been  exalted  to  an 
axiom  by  juvenile  workers  illustrates  the  paradoxical  situation  in 
which  an  attempt  to  supervise  dehnquents  places  the  court.  Not 
even  under  their  "chancery  powers"  have  courts  heretofore  been 
endowed  with  administrative  authority  of  this  kind.  In  all  the 
history  of  legal  procedure  there  cannot  be  found  another  instance 

^Standards  of  Child  Welfare,  Report  from  Conference  Series  No.  i,  Bureau  Pub- 
lication No.  60,  Department  of  Labor,  Washington,  1919,  p.  442- 


l8o  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

where  such  conflicting  powers  and  duties  have  been  placed  in  one 
tribunal. 

This  does  not  mean  that  the  juvenile  offender  should  be  treated 
in  the  same  way  that  the  adult  offender  is  treated,  or  that  there 
should  not  be  special  statutes  concerning  the  punishment  and  cor- 
rection of  children,  or  that  the  laws  heretofore  in  force  have  been 
fitting  or  adequate  in  their  application  to  childish  misconduct. 
It  merely  means  that  the  court  is  not  the  instrumentality  by  which 
these  things  should  be  undertaken. 

If  a  better  adaptation  of  our  social  activities,  particularly  our 
legal  methods,  to  the  needs  of  children  is  imperative,  and  if  the 
court  is  not  the  proper  forum  to  accomplish  it,  it  is  fair  to  ask  what 
agency  should  be  used.  Before  answering  that  question,  it  is  well 
to  consider  briefly  just  what  the  reformation  and  correction  of 
delinquent  children  contemplate.  It  is  evident  that  delinquents 
ma}^  be  divided  broadly  into  two  classes:  first,  those  who  are 
delinquent  on  account  of  unpropitious  environments ;  and,  secondly, 
those  who  on  account  of  feebleness  of  mind  or  body  have  become 
misfits  in  the  social  order.  The  second  class  is  not  subject  to 
improvement  by  moral  suasion.  Incorrigibility  resulting  from  low 
mentality  is  not  curable  by  probation.  Delinquency  resulting 
from  ill  health  is  the  concern  of  the  physician,  not  the  probation 
officer.  The  mentally  and  physically  unfit,  therefore,  as  soon  as 
their  conditions  are  detected,  automatically  eliminate  themselves 
from  the  consideration  of  the  social  worker  immediately  they  are 
placed  in  proper  custody.  His  supervisory  work  is  limited  to  the 
normal  child  who  on  account  of  adventitious  circumstances  finds 
himself  at  cross  purposes  with  the  conventions  of  life.  Only  the 
uninformed  ascribe  anti-social  habits  to  "pure  devilment"  or 
"original  sin."  Incorrigibility  is  an  effect  which  necessarily  pre- 
supposes some  cause.  In  the  normal  child  it  is  an  absence  of 
appreciation  of  his  obligations  to  others.  It  is  induced  by  some 
extraneous  element  which  must  be  found  in  the  home,  the  school, 
or  the  community.  This  idea  was  neatly  expressed  by  Professor 
Randolph  as  follows: 

Every  Juvenile  Court  case  represents,  first,  the  failure  of  a  family  to  adjust 
a  child  to  the  existing  conditions  of  life;  second,  the  failure  of  a  public  school 


THE  COURT  AND  THE  DELINQUENT  CHILD  i8i 

to  offset  a  family's  inadequacy;  and,  third,  the  failure  of  a  community  to 
provide  an  adequate  organization  of  protective  agencies  to  guard  its  children 
from  growing  into  anti-social  and  ruinous  habits.' 

"Anti-social  and  ruinous  habits"  in  the  normal  child  are  the 
result  of  failure  to  train  him  to  observe  the  conventions  of  his 
environment"^  in  other  words,  a  lack  of  education. 

There  are  as  many  definitions  of  education  as  there  are  persons 
who  use  the  word.     Vorhees  defines  it  as  follows: 

Education  is  a  broad  and  comprehensive  term.  It  has  been  defined  as  the 
process  of  developing  and  training  the  powers  and  capabilities  of  human  beings. 
It  is  the  bringing  up,  physically  or  mentally,  of  a  child,  or  the  preparation  of  a 
p)erson,  by  some  due  course  of  training,  for  a  professional  or  business  life,  or 
other  calling.  It  may  be  directed  particularly  to  either  the  mental,  moral, 
or  physical  powers  and  faculties,  but  in  its  broadest  and  best  sense  it  refers  to 
them  all.* 

This  is  probably  as  good  a  definition  as  any  other,  for  it  implies 
what  all  suggest:  the  process  of  making  good  citizens,  of  fitting  the 
young  for  the  responsibilities  of  life.  One  who  capably  and  credit- 
ably discharges  life's  duties  is  a  good  citizen  and  an  educated  person. 
He  cannot  be  incorrigible.  The  reformation  and  correction  of 
dehnquent  children  are,  therefore,  processes  of  education.  When 
they  cease  to  be  dehnquent,  they  are,  to  that  extent,  educated. 

Education  is  specifically  the  province  of  the  home  and  school, 
and  by  no  stretch  of  imagination  that  of  the  court.  It  is  the  duty 
of  the  community  to  provide  the  opportunity  for  good  homes  and 
to  establish  sufficient  schools.  If  the  community  has  not  done  so, 
and  neither  the  home  nor  the  school  has  taught  the  child  to  dis- 
charge his  obligations  to  society,  then  can  it  be  expected  that  the 
court,  the  purposes  of  which  are  altogether  different,  will  succeed 
where  they  have  failed  ? 

Much  less  can  it  be  expected  that  the  court  will  be  able  to 
accomplish  the  most  essential  task  of  preventing  youthful  wrong- 
doings. It  is  elementary^  that  prevention  through  the  wise  direc- 
tion of  children  before  criminal  habits  have  had  time  to  be  formed, 

'  "The  Farm  and  the  School,"  Colorado  Stale  Teachers'  College  Bulletin,  September, 
1918,  Greeley,  Colorado,  p.  46. 

^  Law  of  tJie  Public  Sclwols,  191 7,  Little,  Brown  &  Co.,  Boston,  p.  9,  sec.  6. 


i82  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

is  the  most  certain  means  of  eliminating  puerile  misconduct.  It 
is  seldom  that  the  courts  are  called  upon  until  definite  wayward 
predilections  have  become  fixed.  It  is  then  too  late  to  provide 
the  ounce  of  prevention  or  avert  the  need  of  the  pound  of  cure. 
The  aid  of  the  courts  is  invariably  invoked  when  the  possibilities 
of  success  are  remote.  The  juvenile  court  has  discharged  its  debt 
when  it  has  destroyed  all  necessity  for  its  existence.  Merely 
because  the  natural  agencies  have  often  failed  is  no  reason  why  the 
courts  should  be  warped  to  supply  a  want  totally  foreign  to  their 
genuine  objects. 

"But  what  shall  we  do,"  someone  may  ask,  "if  the  home  and 
the  school  both  fail,  shall  we  then  abandon  all  hope  for  ultimate 
redemption?" 

Certainly  not.  But  if  it  is  expected  that  the  judge  of  a  court, 
by  making  him  super-child-spanker  to  the  community,  will  be  able 
to  succeed  in  the  face  of  previous  failure,  that  expectation  is 
doomed  to  disappointment. 

Remodeling  inefficient  homes  into  cultured  and  effective  ones 
is  a  long  course  and  a  discouraging  one.  Increase  in  income, 
provision  for  wholesome  amusement,  the  teaching  of  parental 
obligations,  the  raising  of  the  standards  of  living,  and  a  thousand 
and  one  other  factors  may  contribute  to  the  betterment  of  family 
conditions.  The  best  immediate  remedy  is  to  make  the  school 
succeed  where  the  home  has  failed.  The  suitable  institution  to 
undertake  the  reformation  and  correction  of  incorrigible  children  is 
the  school. 

Educators  may  argue  that  the  religious  and  moral  training  of 
children  is  no  part  of  school  work;  that  the  school  is  essentially 
interested  only  in  the  intellectual  development.  Whether  or  not 
this  is  theoretically  a  correct  division  of  responsibilities,  it  cannot 
be  denied  that  ethical  training  is  as  much  a  part  of  education  as 
the  teaching  of  the  three  R's.  If  the  schools  are  established  to 
educate  the  child,  then  no  part  of  his  education  can  honestly  be 
ignored  by  them.  But  even  if  this  arbitrary  segregation  be  tenable, 
the  fact  remains  that  the  schools  continually,  willy-nilly,  assume 
supervision  of  moral  instruction.  In  a  large  measure  they  have 
been  forced  to  procure  treatment  for  physical  ailments  and  to  curb 


THE  COURT  AND  THE  DELINQUENT  CHILD  183 

vicious  tendencies,  though  "weak  eyes  and  bad  manners  should  be 
taken  care  of  in  the  home."  If  they  are  not  taken  care  of,  the 
school  is  unable  to  give  the  child  the  full  benefit  of  its  instruction. 
It  is  necessary  to  cure  weak  eyes  and  to  correct  bad  manners  in 
order  to  teach  geography  and  grammar  effectively.  The  school 
has  already  encroached  upon  these  prerogatives  of  the  home;  or, 
it  would  perhaps  be  more  precise  to  say  that  the  home  has  aban- 
doned them  to  the  school.  School  physicians  and  nurses,  dental 
chnics,  noon-day  luncheons,  classes  for  exceptional  children,  and 
many  other  innovations  of  recent  years  emphasize  this  fact. 

If  the  school  is  constrained  in  a  measure  to  extend  its  activities 
beyond  strictly  intellectual  teaching,  it  should  be  thorough  in  its 
expanded  office  and  not  haphazard  and  inconclusive.  Concentra- 
tion in  one  institution  will  certainly  be  more  forceful  than  distri- 
bution among  several  institutions  whose  duties  are  sure  to  overlap 
and  leave  fatal  gaps,  and  no  one  of  which  covers  the  whole 
field. 

There  is  much  argument,  from  the  standpoint  of  the  schools, 
why  they  should  cover  this  wider  field.  Many  educators  and  most 
laymen  feel  that  the  schools  are  not  fulfilKng  their  object  of  "fitting 
the  young  to  discharge  the  responsibilities  of  life."  Pupils  are 
constantly  falling  out  of  school,  because,  as  they  say,  they  are 
"getting  nothing  out  of  it."  Too  much  attention  has  been  paid 
to  "higher  education,"  and  not  enough  to  "common  schools." 
Th£  elementary-  education  of  all  children  is  much  more  important 
than  the  "higher  education"  of  a  few.  Yet  in  every  rural  school 
we  find  two  or  three  lower  grades  under  one  teacher,  while  there  is 
only  one  of  the  upper  grades  under  a  teacher.  If  a  new  building 
is  projected,  it  is  usually  a  high  school  building,  not  a  primary 
building.  These  conditions  should  be  reversed.  Parent  and  child 
should  believe  that  the  "grammar  grades"  are  actually  teaching 
things  that  wdll  be  of  practical  assistance  in  the  everyday  routine 
of  life.  This  cannot  be  done  so  long  as  the  common  schools  are 
designed  merely  to  prepare  students  for  college.  "The  sooner 
schools  organize  to  meet  their  full  responsibilities,  the  sooner 
teachers  are  Ukely  to  acquire  the  measure  of  public  estimation 
which  will  justify  paying  them  the  wages  they  want." 


1 84  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

In  Colorado,  the  child  unruly  in  school  is  a  juvenile  delinquent. 
The  remedial  work  attempted  by  the  court  (necessarily  educational) 
is  designed,  among  other  things,  to  make  the  child  more  subservient 
to  school  rules.  The  truant  is  a  juvenile  delinquent,  and  the  court 
is  called  upon  to  compel  his  attendance  in  school.  Practically 
every  case  of  delinquency  involves  school  children,  their  conduct 
in  school,  and  their  formal  education.  The  judge,  to  make  his 
orders  at  all  coercive,  must  have  the  close  co-operation  of  the 
schools,  and  practically  the  only  fruitful  results  he  accomplishes 
are  through  that  co-operation.  If  the  schools  have,  as  I  believe 
they  have,  potentially  all  the  attributes  necessary  to  carry  on  the 
juvenile  work,  then  by  all  means  let  it  be  confined  to  them.  It  is 
wasteful  to  pile  institution  upon  institution. 

True,  the  schools  are  not  at  the  present  equipped  to  carry  on 
this  task.  Neither,  for  that  matter,  is  the  court.  The  schools 
may  be  so  equipped;  the  court  never  can  be,  if  it  retains  its  true 
form.  In  order  to  supply  the  deficiencies,  many  changes  will  have 
to  be  made  in  the  pedagogical  system.  Without  any  attempt  to 
discuss  them  exhaustively,  it  may  be  well  to  mention  a  few.  There 
should  be  a  county-wide  centralization  of  school  control  in  one 
body  with  power,  among  other  things,  to  direct  the  duration  and 
seasons  of  sessions,  the  curriculum,  the  placing  of  teachers,  the 
enforcement  of  the  compulsory  education  law,  the  designation  of 
textbooks,  and  the  discipline  of  pupils.  There  should  be  con- 
nected with  this  unified  body,  a  complete  organization  of  scientists 
and  trained  workers.  The  age  of  delinquency  and  the  school  age 
should  be  identical.  Then,  assuming  a  strict  enforcement  of  the 
compulsory  attendance  laws,  all  normal  delinquent  children  would 
be  in  the  schools.  All  state  institutions  such  as  reform  schools, 
industrial  schools,  and  training  schools  for  the  feeble-minded,  should 
be  under  the  supervision  of  the  State  Superintendent  of  Public 
Instruction,  or  the  state  ofi&cer  having  similar  powers,  as  an  integral 
part  of  the  school  system.  They  should  not  be  under  the  manage- 
ment of  state  boards  of  charities  and  corrections  or  penal  bureaus. 
In  short,  all  agencies  for  the  instruction,  reformation,  correction, 
and  training  of  children  of  school  age  should  be  subject  to  school 
authority. 


THE  COURT  AND  THE  DELINQUENT  CHILD  185 

In  the  event  any  child  should  prove  so  incorrigible  that  it  should 
become  necessary  to  commit  him  to  an  institution,  such  commit- 
ment should  be  made  by  due  process  of  law.  No  child  should  be 
taken  from  his  parents  before  he  has  had  an  opportunity  to  state 
his  case  before  an  unprejudiced  tribunal.  It  is  indispensable,  also, 
that  for  extreme  cases  of  insubordination,  there  should  be  some 
ofhcer  connected  with  the  schools  with  authority  to  enter  lawful 
judgments  of  punishment  and  commitment,  and  with  power  to 
enforce  them  when  they  are  made.  Here  and  only  here  has  a  court 
any  consistent  place  in  this  work.  Its  jurisdiction  then  would 
extend  only  to  the  judicial  ascertainment  of  whether  or  not  the 
child  before  it  is  in  law  a  delinquent.  If  he  should  be  so  found, 
he  would  be  formally  remanded  to  the  custody  of  school  officials. 
If  they  should  believe  that  he  could  be  helped  best  by  probation, 
then  he  would  be  referred  to  the  school's  probation  officers.  If  it 
were  deemed  wiser  to  confine  him  in  an  institution,  they  should 
have  full  power  to  do  so.  Thus,  the  court  would  discharge  its 
lawful  office  of  judicially  determining  the  guilt  or  innocence  of 
the  child,  and  having  so  determined,  would  have  performed  its 
every  legitimate  function. 

The  jurisdiction  to  determine  these  issues  could  be  placed  in 
estabHshed  courts  or  in  a  special  court  connected  with  the  central 
school  body.  It  should  be  presided  over  by  a  lawyer,  because  even 
a  child  has  a  right  to  an  orderly  trial  and  to  the  protection  that  the 
law  throws  around  all  persons  who  are  accused  of  breaking  it. 
Under  the  present  system  this  is  not  true.  The  judge,  through  the 
investigations  of  his  officers,  has  usually  decided  the  case  before 
the  wrongdoer  has  been  brought  formally  into  court.  Indeed, 
there  is  seldom  any  hearing  until  it  has  been  determined  that  it  is 
necessary  to  sentence.  Probably  there  have  been  but  few  instances 
of  injustice,  but  the  possibility  always  remains,  where  large  prop- 
erty rights  or  personal  interests  are  involved,  that  a  venal  judge 
might  "railroad "  an  innocent  child.  Certainly,  the  means  of  doing 
so  are  present.  Possibly  the  court,  on  account  of  its  personal 
acquaintance  with  children  who  have  been  informally  before  it, 
is  too  prejudiced  to  judge  them  fairly.  The  power  to  take  a  child 
bodily  from  his  parents  and  place  him  in  the  custody  of  strangers 


1 86  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

is  formidable.  The  very  fact  that  our  institutions  are  becoming 
more  and  more  efficient  is  sometimes  a  temptation  to  commit 
children  whose  surroundings  are  not  all  that  they  should  be.  It 
is  unwise  to  intrust  investigation,  decision,  commitment,  and 
supervision  to  any  one  person.  There  should  be  the  wholesome 
check  that  an  independent  court,  presided  over  by  a  judge  trained 
in  the  law  and  respecting  its  principles,  would  have  over  the  too 
enthusiastic  and  often  wholly  biased  investigator. 

By  placing  the  responsibility  of  the  correction  and  reformation 
of  incorrigible  children  in  the  educational  institutions,  and  limiting 
the  powers  of  the  court  to  the  mere  determination  of  the  facts  of 
delinquency,  we  may  anticipate  great  improvement  in  the  methods 
of  treating  incorrigible  children.  Until  this  is  done,  we  must 
"muddle  on"  as  best  we  can,  hoping  against  hope  and  courageously 
striving  to  overcome  insurmountable  obstacles. 


A  COLLEGE  PROGRAM  FOR  RURAL  SOCIOLOGY 


ERNEST  R.  GROVES 
College  of  Liberal  Arts,  Boston  University 


The  departments  of  sociology  in  the  American  colleges  can 
no  longer  be  charged  with  the  neglect  of  the  rural  community.  No 
division  of  the  science  of  sociology  has  made  more  rapid  progress 
during  the  last  ten  years  than  has  rural  sociology.  This  progress 
has  been  mostly  due  to  the  emphasis  that  rural  sociology  has 
received  in  the  program  of  the  sociological  departments  of  the 
colleges.  Courses  have  been  established  in  the  majority  of  the 
colleges  where  sociology  is  taught,  research  has  been  undertaken, 
especially  in  the  form  of  survey  studies,  and  recognition  for  the 
rural  social  interests  has  been  obtained  at  national  conferences. 
The  pioneer  days  of  rural  sociology  are  coming  to  an  end,  and  from 
now  on  the  importance  of  this  division  of  social  science  will  be 
taken  for  granted.  The  need  of  pleading  the  importance  of  rural 
social  interests  has  passed.  The  teacher  of  rural  sociology  must 
now  increasingly  busy  himself  with  the  routine  of  teaching  and  with 
the  problem  of  increasing  the  scientific  value  of  his  subject-matter. 

Teachers  of  rural  sociology  frankly  confess  their  present  diffi- 
culties in  teaching  their  subject.  There  can  be  no  reasonable 
question  in  regard  to  the  importance  of  the  social  life  of  the  rural 
community,  but  it  is  open  to  discussion  whether  we  have  as  yet 
enough  substantial  knowledge  regarding  this  social  life  to  afford 
a  comfortable  teaching  equipment  for  the  instructor.  To  state 
this  does  not  mean  to  discount  in  any  degree  the  value  of  texts 
recently  published.  The  task  of  the  teacher  of  rural  sociology 
has  been  lightened  by  these  texts,  but  the  books  themselves  bear 
the  marks  of  the  pioneering  days  of  the  study  of  rural  social  life. 
The  instructor  in  the  field  of  rural  sociology  finds  his  work  less 
difficult  than  it  has  been  but  he  still  carries  the  handicap  of  teaching 
a  body  of  knowledge  for  the  most  part  still  in  the  process  of  being 

187 


1 88  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

made.  The  contrast  between  the  teaching  problem  in  the  rural 
field  and  the  urban  is  vividly  felt  by  every  instructor  who  has 
classes  in  both  subjects. 

It  would  be  too  much  to  claim  a  distinct  teaching  technique 
for  the  rural  sociologist.  It  is,  however,  safe  to  maintain  that 
rural  sociology  has  its  own  program  and  that,  as  a  part  of  the  college 
curriculum,  there  is  need  of  formulating  this  program  in  a  catholic 
manner  that  each  element  may  receive  reasonable  emphasis. 

At  the  present  time  there  is  one  difficulty  that  every  teacher  of 
rural  sociology  experiences.  Cities  the  nation  over  are  essentially 
alike.  The  differences  between  urban  conditions  are  not  such  as 
to  create  a  difficulty  in  the  teaching  of  urban  sociology.  In  rural 
sociolog}^  however,  the  situation  is  such  that  geographical  and 
local  variations  must  ever  be  kept  in  mind.  If  the  student  is  to 
feel  personal  contact  with  the  subject,  due  regard  must  be  paid  to 
the  conditions  as  he  knows  them  in  his  own  community.  Oppor- 
tunity has  to  be  provided  for  him  to  grasp  the  significance  of  such 
facts  as  he  has  or  can  discover  in  the  Ufe  of  a  rural  people  that  he 
personally  knows.  At  the  same  time  he  must  be  kept  from  seeing 
all  rural  hfe  through  his  own  contacts.  And  because  of  the  vari- 
ations in  rural  life  conditions,  considered  nation-wide,  this  is  in  its 
teaching  aspects  a  more  difficult  problem  than  any  that  arises  in 
the  teaching  of  urban  sociology. 

The  teacher  of  rural  sociology  also  wrestles  with  another 
difficulty  that  he  escapes  in  the  urban  science.  That  is  the  task 
of  isolating  country  from  village  society.  The  latter  has  not  yet 
a  sociology  of  its  own,  and  yet  in  teaching  rural  sociology-  it  is 
constantly  necessary  to  contrast  village  life  and  that  of  the  open 
and  remote  country.  Of  course,  the  two  societies  are  bound 
together  by  intimate  and  common  interests.  This  statement  of 
intimacy  and  mutual  relationship  is  true  also  of  rural  and  urban 
societies.  The  latter  groups,  however,  can  be  separated  for  the 
purposes  of  teaching  without  difficulty;  at  present  the  former 
must  be  treated  together  since  the  village  is  so  largely  the  natural 
center  for  the  group  interests  of  the  rural  people.  The  teacher 
cannot  do  justly  by  the  student  unless  he  leaves  him  realizing  both 
the  natural  variations  in  rural  life  conditions  and  the  necessary 


A  COLLEGE  PROGRAM  FOR  RURAL  SOCIOLOGY  189 

distinction  in  science  between  country  and  village  social  life.  If 
the  material  the  teacher  uses,  texts  and  articles,  more  carefully 
observed  these  distinctions  his  task  would  not  be  nearly  so  difficult. 
One  of  the  interesting  outcomes  of  this  situation  that  promises 
relief  to  the  teacher  of  rural  sociology  is  the  increasing  attention 
that  village  social  life  is  receiving.  Alongside  rural  sociology  there 
is  rapidly  developing  a  village  sociology  which  will  soon  be  a  science 
by  itself. 

The  development  of  rural  sociology  has  been  accelerated  by 
the  pressure  of  social  need.  It  has  formed  itself  in  the  atmosphere 
of  applied  science.  Experience  has  demonstrated  that  country 
welfare  cannot  be  maintained  merely  by  making  farming  more 
profitable.  Country-life  leadership  has  been  forced  to  recognize 
the  social  problems,  for  the  farmers  themselves  have  repudiated  a 
program  exclusively  economic.  The  demand  for  assistance  from 
the  colleges  in  solving  the  social  problems  of  rural  and  village 
groups  has  been  incessant  and  urgent.  Students  looking  forward 
to  residence  or  to  social  work  in  the  country  have  elected  rural 
sociology  courses  expecting  the  practical  purposes  of  the  courses 
to  be  given  emphasis.  This  expectation  has  added  to  the  courses ' 
zest,  but  it  has  also  at  times  removed  the  students  from  the  atmos- 
phere of  scientific  investigation  into  that  of  mere  applied  knowledge. 
The  influence  of  the  extension  service  of  the  agricultural  colleges 
has  added  to  the  pressure  upon  the  sociologist  for  propagable 
information,  when,  first  of  all,  there  has  been  need  of  gathering  a 
substantial  body  of  fact.  As  one  would  expect  there  has  resulted  a 
medley  of  counsel  in  regard  to  social  uplift  in  country  districts 
that  has  irritated  some  of  the  rural  people  and  confused  the  social 
workers.  This  situation  has  disclosed  itself  in  nearly  every  con- 
ference of  national  character  where  rural  social  problems  have  been 
given  a  place  upon  the  program.  The  era  of  cocksureness  with 
reference  to  the  social  panaceas  to  be  gulped  down  by  rural  folk 
has  about  passed,  and  everywhere  there  is  a  disposition  patiently 
to  collect  the  facts  regarding  rural  society  and  build  up  a  science 
of  understanding,  even  if  meanwhile  counsel  regarding  country 
life  needs  be  given  with  less  confidence  and  in  less  profusion.  And 
this  is  the  pathway  of  progress  for  the  science.     Nothing  has  more 


IQO  TEE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

certainly  exposed  the  elementary  attainments  of  rural  sociology 
in  the  past  than  the  dogmatic  stressing  by  some  would-be  reformers 
of  the  "one  thing  needed"  to  cause  rural  society  to  flower  in  per- 
fection. The  student  of  urban  social  life  has  seldom  been  tempted 
to  assume  such  an  attitude  because  he  has  been  forced  to  realize 
the  complexities  of  the  social  demands  of  the  cities.  People  who 
live  in  the  country  are  no  less  human  than  their  city  brethren  and 
they  do  not  present  in  their  grouping  a  single  problem  to  be  solved, 
but  rather  a  complex  social  demand  which  requires  reasonable 
satisfactions.  No  scientist  would  advocate  solving  the  urban 
problem,  for  to  estimate  the  needs  of  city  social  life  as  one  problem 
would  seem  fooHsh.  It  has  been  the  pressure  for  information 
regarding  social  needs  on  the  part  of  propagandists  and  social 
workers  for  application  in  the  rural  field  that  has  betrayed  the 
student  of  rural  society  as  a  scientist  and  made  him  at  times  an 
overconfident  advocate. 

Farmers  as  a  class  are  irritated  by  reformers  who  come  forward 
with  a  "cure-all"  for  country-Hfe  difficulties.  The  vocation  of 
soil  cultivation  teaches  caution  with  respect  to  such  simple  diag- 
nosis. The  farmer  learns  from  painful  experiences  that  there  are 
many  factors  that  condition  success  in  food  production  and  he 
looks  askance,  even  with  deep  hostility,  upon  anyone  who  appears 
with  one  solution  for  all  the  difficulties  in  any  department  of  rural 
concern.  His  quickness  to  react  against  such  preachment  has 
occasionally  led  him  to  mistake  emphasis  and  concentration  upon 
one  particular  element  of  rural  need  as  an  assumption  that  were 
the  one  problem  solved  all  would  be  well.  In  such  cases  the  rural- 
welfare  worker  has  had  his  message  hindered  by  a  greater  obstacle 
than  the  conventional  inertia  to  which  the  hostility  has  been 
charged.  Urban  folk  may  more  easily  be  led  into  the  fallacy  of 
simpUcity  when  diagnosing  difficulties,  economic  or  social,  because 
they  have  isolated  experiences  that  prevent  their  understanding  the 
normal  working  of  the  causal  laws  of  production.  This  funda- 
mental difference  between  the  thinking  of  people  in  the  country- 
and  those  in  the  cities  has,  in  the  past,  been  passed  over  lightly, 
and  the  farmer's  mistrust  of  a  one-idea  program  has  been  mis- 
interpreted as  mere  conservatism.     Poultry  are  more  simple  than 


A  COLLEGE  PROGRAM  FOR  RURAL  SOCIOLOGY  191 

people  and  yet  the  fanner  has  listened  patiently  to  social  enthusiasts 
who  have  pictured  all  rural  life  made  perfect  by  the  consolidated 
school,  or  the  union  church,  or  the  co-operative  society  when  he 
would  leave  in  disgust  were  a  poultryman  to  declare  that  a  single 
procedure  would  guarantee  one's  success  in  raising  leghorn  hens. 

In  fairness  to  the  problem  of  the  teacher  of  rural  sociology  it 
must  be  granted  that  the  farmer  has  not  assisted  in  the  accumula- 
tion of  social  information  as  might  have  been  expected.  There  are 
differences  east  and  west,  but  generally  the  farmer  is  sensitive  to 
any  investigation  of  his  social  conditions.  He  seems  to  assume 
that  he  is  on  the  defensive  and  is  often  quick  to  take  offense  when 
for  his  own  interests  he  should  be  eager  to  co-operate.  This  by 
no  means  indicates  that  the  average  farmer  is  well  satisfied  with 
the  social  conditions  of  his  environment,  for  he  has  no  hesitation 
in  telling  you  his  complaints.  When  he  is  called  upon,  however, 
to  assist  in  a  cold,  scientific  investigation  of  the  situation  against 
which  he  complains,  he  frequently  stands  aloof  or  even  bitterly 
protests.  This  attitude  is  rapidly  passing,  and  perhaps  the  farmer's 
distrust  has  been  of  the  scientist  rather  than  of  his  science.  In 
order  to  reduce  this  suspicion  to  its  minimum,  emphasis  has  been 
placed  upon  the  need  of  the  rural  sociologist's  having  been  himself 
in  his  boyhood  a  worker  on  the  farm.  It  so  happens  that  the 
understanding  of  people  does  not  necessarily  come  from  having 
shared  their  experiences,  and  too  much  confidence  has  been  placed 
upon  the  value  of  personal,  individual  country-life  experiences  as 
a  foundation  for  the  rural  sociologist  in  his  intimate  relations  with 
farmers.  Vocational  experiences  in  early  life  may,  as  the  newer 
psychology  shows  in  detail,  easily  become  a  separating  obstacle 
rather  than  a  basis  for  friendly  appreciation  when  the  adult  comes 
into  association  with  a  group  of  which  he  was  once  a  member.  The 
point  of  emphasis  has  been  wrong.  It  is  important  not  that  the 
rural  sociologist  was  once  a  farmer;  it  is  imperative  that  he  know 
without  prejudice  farmers  as  they  are  now  in  the  section  where  he 
has  contact  with  them. 

The  rural  sociologist  at  the  present  time  has  need  to  keep  in 
mind  all  the  conditions  that  influence  his  teaching  problem  when  he 
constructs  his  college  program.     In  his  classes  he  may  expect  men 


192  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

and  women  who  bring  to  the  institution  the  impress  of  the  social 
life  of  representative  farming  communities.  Among  his  students 
also  will  be  many  who  will  return  to  rural  communities  and  to  a 
greater  or  less  degree  become  leaders  in  their  chosen  localities. 
That  the  institution  may  contribute  its  just  share  to  country-Hfe 
progress  the  courses  must  also  have  definite  motives.  One  such 
teaching  purpose  is  the  establishment  of  sound  social  standards 
for  rural  groups.  No  product  of  the  classroom  is  likely  to  have 
a  more  lasting  value  than  this.  If  the  student  by  reports  and  dis- 
cussions can  be  led  to  measure  the  failures  and  successes  of  his 
community  in  comparison  with  conditions  reported  by  his  class 
associates  in  other  localities  a  wholesome  basis  is  laid  for  future 
activities  in  community  service.  Under  such  circumstances  it  is 
difficult  for  a  student  to  leave  the  course  with  the  dangerous  con- 
fidence that  he  fully  understands  the  needs  of  a  community  and 
has  nothing  more  to  know.  It  is,  of  course,  impossible  for  him 
ever  to  regard  his  community,  after  having  made  many  comparisons 
between  the  social  life  as  it  is  and  as  it  might  be,  as  a  finished  pro- 
duct. In  this  way  the  instruction  removes  both  the  contentment 
of  conservatism  and  the  simplicity  of  the  would-be  reformer. 

By  having  reports  made  from  time  to  time  by  the  student 
regarding  the  social  conditions  of  his  own  community  with  respect 
to  the  problem  before  the  class  for  discussion  there  naturally 
develops  a  clear  and  vivid  conception  of  the  situation  in  various 
localities.  This  series  of  reports  forces  each  student  to  become 
conscious  of  the  failures  of  his  own  community  as  compared  with 
the  higher  standards  of  others  and  he  gradually  tends  to  construct 
an  extensive  social  program  for  the  group  life  he  knows  best. 

Another  purpose  of  the  courses  in  rural  sociology  is  the  furnish- 
ing of  accurate  information  regarding  social  conditions  and  resources 
in  the  country.  Future  rural  leadership  must  be  given  a  clear 
understanding  of  the  country-life  situation  in  its  many  aspects. 
Here  it  is  especially  necessary  that  the  student  learn  how  to  collect 
social  facts,  how  to  estimate  the  value  and  determine  the  significance 
of  surveys,  public  reports,  and  other  material  from  which  the 
sociologist  draws  his  conclusions.  In  the  former  pioneering  days 
it  has  been  difficult  to  give  the  student  at  this  point  the  adequate 
assistance  that  he  has  had  a  right  to  expect.     The  instructor  has 


A  COLLEGE  PROGRAM  FOR  RURAL  SOCIOLOGY 


193 


felt  obliged  either  to  depend  upon  lectures  or  upon  a  text  to  a  degree 
that  has  diminished  the  student's  opportunity  for  first-hand 
knowledge  of  the  raw  material  of  the  science.  The  source  books 
containing  valuable  collections  of  readings  that  are  being  prepared 
and  are  likely  to  be  published  soon  will  certainly  be  helpful,  espe- 
cially in  institutions  where  the  library  material  is  inadequate. 
However,  these  collections,  valuable  as  they  will  be,  must  not 
satisfy  the  instructor  in  his  desire  to  bring  the  student  into  contact 
with  original  material.  It  will  often  prove  profitable  to  require  of 
the  students  a  bibliography  representing  the  collection  that  he 
himself  regards  as  best  for  the  purpose  of  outside  reading.  The 
instructor  can,  near  the  end  of  the  courses,  criticize  these  various 
collections  and  thus  help  the  student  in  his  effort  to  determine  the 
value  of  articles  and  reports  on  rural  conditions. 

No  course  in  rural  sociology  fulfils  its  purpose  unless  it  has  a 
part  in  increasing  popular  interest  in  the  social  problems  of  the 
country.  It  especially  has  an  obligation  with  reference  to  the  future 
leadership  of  the  country  communities.  This  seems  so  essential 
a  part  of  the  teaching  program  as  to  need  little  comment.  In 
practice,  however,  the  teacher  in  the  state  college  sometimes  finds 
himself  limited  by  the  lack  of  interest  that  his  colleagues  in  agri- 
culture take  in  the  social  side  of  country  affairs.  Courses  in  rural 
sociology  have  been  added  to  the  curriculum  of  agricultural  colleges 
recently  and  they  find  the  older  vocational  subjects  in  possession 
of  the  field.  Unless  checked  by  administrative  policy,  some  depart- 
ments encourage  the  student  to  attempt  premature  specialization 
and  everything  is  done  to  discount  the  need  of  the  student's  having 
an  adequate  preparation  for  rural  leadership  as  well  as  the  basis  for 
business  success.  The  vitality  of  the  courses  in  rural  social  matters 
best  meets  this  situation  which  fortunately  is  rapidly  passing. 

Rural  sociology  is  merely  a  division  in  a  larger  field  and  it  has 
a  purpose  in  giving  the  student  of  general  sociology  the  rural 
viewpoint.  It  is  certainly  unfortunate  if  the  courses  of  the  depart- 
ment are  elected  only  by  those  who  look  forward  to  living  in  the 
country.  The  attempt  made  at  some  of  the  agricultural  colleges 
to  deny  the  students  any  courses  in  urban  sociology  is  the  result  of 
regarding  the  rural  and  urban  environments  as  not  having  relation- 
ship.    As  a  matter  of  fact,  both  rural  and  urban  social  conditions 


194  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

need  to  be  understood  by  anyone  who  wishes  to  have  knowledge 
of  either  environment,  and  for  this  reason  in  our  rural  courses  we 
need  to  keep  in  mind  the  interests  of  those  who  wish  to  see  the 
social  field  as  a  whole.  To  construct  the  courses  in  a  narrow  spirit 
of  regard  only  for  the  countr}'-life  student  is  to  delay  the  progress 
of  the  science  and  to  remove  it  from  the  current  of  inspiration. 
Courses  of  rural  sociology  should  not  be  given  for  the  purpose  of 
furnishing  rural  self-satisfaction  for  the  men  and  women  who  are 
destined  "to  return  to  the  land"  after  having  received  from  the 
college  a  prophyl3,ctic  against  the  dangers  of  urban  attraction. 
For  the  teacher  the  presence  in  the  class  of  students  whose  major 
interests  are  outside  the  rural  field  proves  a  decided  advantage, 
since,  to  win  these  students,  the  courses  have  to  be  taught  in  a 
cathoHc  manner. 

In  developing  his  college  courses  the  rural  sociologist  surely 
should  not  neglect  their  possible  influence  in  attracting  the  more 
promising  students  into  graduate  study  within  the  field  of  rural 
social  science.  The  present  difficulty  that  colleges  experience  in 
getting  instructors  qualified  to  teach  rural  sociolog}'  demonstrates 
that  there  is  need  of  encouraging  students  who  desire  to  teach  college 
sociology  to  specialize  along  rural  lines.  The  immediate  future  of 
the  science  will  be  largely  decided  by  the  character  of  the  students 
that  may  at  present  become  interested  in  rural  sociology-.  No 
teaching  method  can  do  so  much  to  win  the  attention  of  the  best 
students  to  the  significance  of  the  rural  field  as  the  requirement  of 
investigations  from  members  of  the  class.  In  addition  to  the 
thesis,  which  may  be  presented  at  the  end  of  the  course  and  the 
reports  frequently  made  concerning  the  social  Hfe  of  the  student's 
own  community,  the  use  of  topic  questions  for  class  discussions 
seems,  in  the  experience  of  some  teachers,  more  appealing  to  the 
majority  of  the  students  and  more  profitable  than  lectures  and 
assigned  readings.  The  larger  the  contribution  of  the  student,  the 
more  acquainted  he  becomes  with  the  raw  material  of  the  science, 
the  more  likely  he  is  to  realize  the  opportunity  of  graduate  study. 
If  the  progress  of  rural  social  science  is  to  prosper  as  it  should,  the 
college  teacher  constantly  must  send  forward  promising  candidates 
for  advanced  stud3\ 


A  COMPLETELY  SOCIALIZED  SCHOOL' 


ROBERT  A.  CUMMINS 
Louisiana  State  Normal  College 


In  the  evolution  of  society  it  became  necessary  for  some  special 
provision  to  be  made  for  the  instruction  of  the  youth,  in  order 
that  the  accumulated  experiences  and  traditions  of  the  race 
might  be  preserved  and  handed  down  to  successive  generations. 
The  school  as  an  institution  of  society  was  thus  brought  into  exist- 
ence and  has  gradually  developed  and  enlarged  its  borders  until 
today  it  may  be  affirmed  that  the  school  is  charged  with  greater 
responsibility  for  the  future  welfare  of  society  than  any  other 
institution.  If  this  be  true,  and  few  there  be  who  doubt  it,  it 
logically  follows  that  tiie  school  should  he  completely  socialized. 

In  discussing  the  socialized  school  I  wish  to  submit,  first,  that 
the  curriculum  should  he  socialized. 

To  socialize  the  curriculum  means  to  suit  it  to  the  present  and 
future  needs  of  the  pupils.  The  first  need  of  children,  beyond 
the  mere  necessities  of  life,  such  as  food  and  shelter,  is  a  mastery 
of  the  tool  subjects,  viz.,  reading,  writing,  spelling,  and  arithmetic. 
Next  the  pupil  should  gain  a  reasonable  amount  of  useful  infor- 
mation from  the  fields  of  history%  literature,  and  science,  after 
which  he  is  ready  for  a  few  years  of  "sampling''  of  as  many  of  the 
vocations  as  possible,  with  a  view  of  assisting  to  decide  the  most 
important  question  of  life,  aside  from  religion  and  marriage,  viz., 
the  question  of  one's  vocation  in  life. 

Having  decided  upon  the  vocation  which  he  wishes  to  follow, 
which  should  be  done  while  in  the  junior  high  school,  or  shortly 
thereafter,  the  pupil  is  then  ready  to  begin  acquiring  the  neces- 
sary' skill  with  which  to  make  his  chosen  life-work  a  success.  But 
if  we  should  know  what  particular   "attitudes,"   "skills,"   and 

'  Address  delivered  before  the  Rural  School  Section  of  the  Iowa  State  Teachers' 
Association,  Des  Moines,  Iowa,  February,  1919,  and  also  before  the  Parish  Teachers' 
Institute,  Natchitoches,  Louisiana,  at  the  opening  of  the  school  year,  1919-20. 

19.S 


196  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

"knowledge"  should  be  taught  in  the  schools,  we  shall  have  to 
inquire  as  to  what  is  commonly  demanded  of  adult  members  of 
society.  For  example,  what  kind  of  arithmetic  is  used  in  every- 
day life  ?  What  sort  of  proficiency  in  handwriting  will  meet  the 
demand  of  those  who  read  handwriting  ?  Or  what  words  does  one 
need  to  know  how  to  spell  in  order  to  make  himself  understood  in 
writing  ? 

The  first  step  in  the  sociaUzing  of  the  curriculum,  obviously, 
then,  is  to  eliminate  all  useless  material  from  the  subjects  taught. 
This  movement  was  inaugurated  by  Dr.  Frank  IVI.  IMcMurry  at 
the  meeting  of  the  Department  of  Superintendents  in  1904.  A 
decade  later  the  Iowa  State  Teachers'  Association  appointed  a 
committee  to  study  and  to  make  a  report  upon  the  elimination  of 
obsolete  and  useless  materials  from  the  common  school  branches 
with  a  view  that  the  efforts  of  childhood  may  be  conserved  and 
the  essentials  better  taught.  The  report  of  this  committee  was 
published  in  two  consecutive  volumes  and  supports  in  general 
the  recommendations  made  by  Dr.  McMurry,  which  were,  briefly 
speaking,  to  eliminate  (i)  what  cannot  be  shown  to  have  a  plain 
relation  to  some  real  need  of  life,  (2)  that  which  is  beyond  the 
child's'  comprehension,  (3)  whatever  is  unlikely  to  appeal  to  his 
native  interests,  and  (4)  whatever  topics,  or  parts  of  topics,  are  so 
isolated  or  irrelevant  that  they  fail  to  make  connections  with  the 
chain  of  ideas  that  constitutes  needful  education. 

It  has  been  commonly  known  for  many  years  that  much  of  the 
Lernstof  in  arithmetic,  such  as  cube  root,  troy  and  apothecaries 
weight,  true  discount,  greatest  common  divisor,  least  common 
multiple,  various  tables  of  foreign  moneys,  folding  paper,  etc., 
and  most  of  longitude  and  time,  compound  and  annual  interest, 
etc.,  function  httle,  if  at  all,  in  everyday  life.  But  notwithstand- 
ing all  these  known  facts,  such  topics  are  found  in  many  textbooks 
in  use  throughout  the  country,  after  two  decades  of  campaigning 
against  such  waste  of  time  in  school  work. 

Having  thus  purged  the  curriculum  from  all  useless  material, 
there  is  room  for  the  introduction  of  much  that  is  highly  worth 
while  in  the  traditional  subjects,  besides  the  introduction  of  new 
subjects  of  a  vocational  nature,  such  as  domestic  science,  industrial 


A  COMPLETELY  SOCIALIZED  SCHOOL  197 

and  fine  arts.  In  a  word,  the  tendency  is  to  reduce  the  elementary- 
school  subjects,  especially  the  tool  subjects,  to  a  basis  of  ''mini- 
mum essentials,"  which  should  be  mastered  by  the  average  pupil 
in  the  first  sL\  years.  The  next  three  years  properly  constitute 
the  junior  high-school  period  and  should  be  devoted  largely  to  a 
sampling  of  as  many  of  the  vocations  as  possible  and  the  further 
study  of  Hterature  and  science.  Following  this  the  senior  high- 
school  period  will  furnish  opportunity  for  the  acquiring  of  skill 
in  one's  chosen  vocation,  or  for  further  preparatory  study,  depend- 
ing upon  whether  the  pupil  expects  to  attend  an  institution  of 
higher  learning  or  drop  out  at  the  close  of  the  high-school  period. 
At  present,  of  course,  the  masses  drop  out  in  the  grades  and  early 
years  of  the  high  school,  but  since  the  high  school  is  destined  to 
become  the  "people's  college"  the  curriculum  should  speedily  be 
shaped  to  meet  these  requirements. 

In  the  second  place  I  wish  to  submit  that  the  teacher  should  he 
socialized. 

In  an  article  prepared  for  the  Ohio  Educational  Monthly  some 
years  ago  it  was  argued  that  the  "methods  of  teaching"  should  be 
socialized,  but  since  then  I  have  come  to  feel  that,  after  all,  the 
teacher  and  the  method  are  but  two  aspects  of  the  same  considera- 
tion, hence  are  inseparable.  The  teacher  is  the  method;  hence 
the  real  proposition  is  to  socialize  the  teacher,  method  and  all. 

The  socialized  teacher  is  one  who  conceives  of  her  work  in  the 
schoolroom  as  a  definite  part  of  the  larger  work  that  is  being 
wrought  by  the  school  in  society,  and  who  bends  every  effort  to 
bring  her  pupils  to  behave  accordingly.  With  such  a  conception 
on  the  part  of  the  teacher  and  her  pupils,  school  life  becomes  a 
real  part  of  the  broader  life  of  society  and  is  no  longer  looked  upon 
as  a  mere  preparation  for  life.  To  be  sure,  as  Professor  Coe  has 
very  aptly  stated,  "children  should  be  schooled /(?r  something," 
but  the  fact  still  remains  that  schools  exist  primarily  because 
children  exist. 

Social  efficiency  is  now  the  commonly  accepted  aim  of  educa- 
tion, and  since  the  school  is  the  chief  formal  agency  of  education, 
the  obvious  task  of  the  teacher  is  to  guide  in  the  development  of 
the  pupil  to  this  end.     A  socially  efficient  individual  must  measure 


198  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

up  to  three  rather  definite  requirements:  (i)  pull  his  own  weight 
in  society,  (2)  not  interfere  with  the  rights  of  others,  (3)  be  a  mis- 
sionar}^  That  is,  he  must  earn  his  own  livelihood,  without  in  any 
way  hindering  others,  and  endeavor  to  have  a  little  left  over  to 
bestow  upon  others  who  may  be  less  fortunate  than  he  himself. 
A  little  of  this  world's  goods,  a  little  of  sympathy,  a  little  of  help- 
fulness— a  little  of  all  that  is  needed  to  make  the  world  a  bit  better. 

In  order  to  understand  more  clearly  just  what  is  meant  by  a 
socially  efficient  individual,  let  me  illustrate  by  a  brief  analysis  of 
human  society.  It  is  easy  to  divide  society  into  two  classes,  the 
one  class  being  socially  efficient  and  the  other  not  so.  This  rather 
trite  way  of  putting  it  reminds  one  of  the  musical  classification  of 
Pat  Murphy's  tunes.  Nobody  had  ever  heard  Pat  whistle  but  one 
tune,  yet  Pat  himself  declared  that  he  could  whistle  two  tunes. 
Upon  being  pressed  with  the  demand  to  name  the  two  tunes,  Pat 
extricated  himself  in  a  laudable  fashion  by  saying,  "Faith  and 
begorra,  the  one  tune  is  Yankee  Doodle,  and  the  other  isn't." 

So,  like  Pat,  I  insist  that  there  are  but  two  classes  of  people  in 
the  world,  the  one  is  socially  efficient  and  the  other  isn't.  But  I 
propose  to  go  Pat  one  better  and  describe  the  class  that  is  not 
socially  efficient,  as  well  as  the  class  that  is.  On  the  authority  of 
Dewey,  Bagley,  Betts,  King,  et  al.,  I  have  already  described  the 
socially  efficient  individual  as  one  who  pulls  his  own  weight  in 
society,  without  hindering  any  one  else  and  who  stands  ready  to 
lend  a  helping  hand  to  those  of  his  fellows  who  are  in  any  way 
unfortunate. 

Obviously,  then,  the  non-socially  efficient  are  those  who  fail  to 
measure  up  to  the  standards  set  by  society  in  one  or  more  of  these 
respects.  In  offering  this  further  analysis  I  am  aware  that  no  less 
an  authority  than  Professor  Giddings  gives  a  threefold  classifica- 
tion of  society,  viz.,  social,  non-social,  and  antisocial.  But  for 
the  purpose  of  this  discussion  I  have  made  no  provision  for  the 
middle-of-the-road,  on-the-fence,  buzzard  sort  of  folk,  who  insist 
on  living,  but  who  endeavor  to  keep  out  of  people's  way  by  sitting 
idly  by  waiting  for  someone  to  die,  or  some  other  chance  cir- 
cumstance of  life  to  take  place,  whereby  they  may  fall  into  a 
lucrative  position  without  effort,  or  be  fed  by  the  ravens  without 


A  COMPLETELY  SOCIALIZED  SCHOOL  199 

so  much  as  turning  a  hand.  Righteousness  should  be  laid  to  the 
plummet  and  judgment  to  the  line  in  matters  of  this  kind.  A 
person  is  either  socially  efficient  enough  to  be  classed  with  those 
who  are,  or  he  is  not. 

Logically,  therefore,  the  non-socially  efficient  class  falls  into 
three  subclasses.  The  first  of  these  I  shall  designate  as  the  loafer 
class.  These  are  the  bums,  the  fellows  who  wouldn't  work  if  they 
had  a  chance,  the  fellows  who  claim  that  the  world  owes  them  a 
living  and  all  that  they  have  to  do  is  to  collect  it.  At  the  present 
time  their  number  is  legion  and  they  go  by  the  name  of  "Bolshe- 
viki."  I  would  also  include  in  the  loafer  class  the  hoboes,  although 
JefT  Davis,  the  king  of  the  hoboes,  declares  that  his  tribe  is  in  no 
way  related  to  the  "bum"  tribe  and  hence  refuses  to  admit  bums 
to  the  Hotel  de  Jinks.  Measured  by  the  socially  efficient  standard 
the  "loafer"  falls  short  in  that  he  fails  to  pull  his  own  weight. 
Therefore  he  must  be  classed  with  the  "isn'ts." 

The  second  class  of  the  non-socially  efficient  I  shall  call  the 
unfair  class.  These  are  the  people  who  pull  their  own  weight  in 
society  and  who  may  even  be  liberal  and  beneficent  but  who  pay 
no  regard  to  the  rights  of  others.  They  are  the  advocates  of 
"personal  rights,"  such  as  are  frequently  heard  on  the  streets  of 
our  larger  cities  defending  such  notorious  institutions  as  the  legal- 
ized liquor  traffic,  regulated  gambling,  wide-open  municipal 
administration,  and  oftentimes  many  of  the  more  modern  forms 
of  social  evil,  such  as  the  free  love  cult,  radical  forms  of  lockouts, 
strikes,  etc. 

The  third  class  of  the  non-socially  efficient  I  shall  designate 
as  the  miser  class.  The  real  miser  is  more  common  in  society 
than  most  people  would  admit.  He  is  the  person  who  pulls  his 
own  weight  and  does  it  in  such  a  way  as  at  least  to  keep  out  of  the 
penitentiary,  but  when  it  comes  to  parting  with  any  of  his  hard- 
earned  "stuff"  he  is  ultra-conservative  and  always  prays  for  more 
time  to  consider  the  matter  before  making  his  contribution.  The 
result  is  that  the  more  he  thinks  it  over,  the  more  time  he  wants 
to  think  it  over,  and  the  more  conservative  he  feels.  He  finally 
decides  not  to  part  with  a  foot  of  his  real  estate,  even  though  it 
may  be  wanted  for  a  private  burying  place  or  for  a  public  park. 


200  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

The  Sunday  school  superintendent  who,  upon  being  solicited  for 
a  five-year  pledge  for  church  extension,  finally  decided  that  he  would 
not  make  any  pledge  for  the  future  and  presumed  to  justify  his 
action  by  referring  to  the  passage  of  Scripture  which  says  that 
"it  is  better  not  to  make  a  vow  than  to  make  a  vow  and  not  keep 
it"  was  a  t\^ical  miser  in  spirit.  The  citizen  who  claimed  to  be 
an  American  and  yet  refused  to  support  the  Liberty  Loans,  the 
member  of  the  church  who  contributed  but  $5 .  00  for  missions  on 
the  plea  that  this  was  all  the  money  he  had,  when  as  a  matter  of 
fact  his  check  would  have  been  good  for  any  reasonable  amount, 
the  farmer  who  does  not  contribute  to  the  county  hospital  fund 
because  all  the  money  he  can  rake  and  scrape  is  needed  to  meet 
the  payments  on  the  additional  forty  acres  recently  purchased, 
the  citizen  who  declines  to  support  the  movement  for  better  public 
schools  on  the  ground  that  all  of  his  children  are  through  school 
and  what  was  good  enough  for  them  is  still  good  enough  for  any- 
one else's  children,  are  all  examples  of  the  miser  class. 

The  socialized  teacher  will  put  forth  every  effort  to  prevent  the 
propagation  of  the  non-socially  efficient  classes  through  the  social 
heredity  of  the  school.  One  of  the  first  moves  that  a  teacher 
can  make  in  this  direction  is  to  socialize  the  recitation.  Some 
of  the  specific  things  that  may  be  done  to  socialize  the  recitation 
are  such  as  the  following:  ask  for  movable  chair-desks  for  the 
lower  grades  and  tables  and  chairs  for  the  upper  grades,  in  order 
that  they  may  be  arranged  in  different  ways,  to  suit  the  various 
kinds  of  work  undertaken,  and  pushed  aside  when  not  in  use. 
The  writer  has  used  this  plan  with  great  profit  in  normal-school 
and  college  classes.  With  this  arrangement  of  the  chairs  the  pupils 
recite  to  the  class  instead  of  to  the  teacher  and  are  thus  made  to 
feel  socially  responsible  to  the  group.  Other  devices  for  socializing 
the  recitation  are  to  encourage  pupils  to  ask  questions  of  each 
other,  bring  individual  reports  to  the  class,  engage  in  self-organized 
group  work,  and  the  like. 

Having  given  some  attention  to  the  socializing  of  the  recitation, 
the  teacher  will  carry  out  this  same  idea  in  the  general  activities 
of  the  school  as  represented  by  the  club  work,  the  team  work,  the 
athletics,  and  other  forms  of  organized  recreation.     A  community 


A  COMPLETELY  SOCIALIZED  SCHOOL  20l 

that  is  so  fortunate  as  to  secure  the  services  of  a  socialized  teacher 
will  feel  the  weight  of  her  influence  before  the  term  is  half  over. 

In  the  third  place  I  submit  that  tJic  superintendent  should  be 
socialized. 

In  order  to  have  a  thoroughly  socialized  school  it  is  not  only 
necessar\^  that  the  curriculum  and  the  teacher  be  socialized,  but  it 
is  highly  advisable  to  have  a  little  social  serum  injected  into  the 
superintendent  or  supervisor,  as  the  case  may  be.  This  may  prove 
to  be  a  painful  operation,  but  nevertheless  it  should  be  done  in 
order  to  insure  a  proper  functioning  of  his  administrative  office. 

The  effect  of  the  innoculation  of  the  superintendent  with 
social  serum  is  usually  first  seen  in  his  changed  attitude  toward 
the  social  hfe  of  the  pupils.  This  is  especially  noticeable  in  the 
case  of  a  superintendent  who  has  to  do  with  pupils  of  high-school 
age.  Before  the  innoculation  he  is  apprehensive,  if  not  outspokenly 
afraid,  that  the  pupils  will  pay  too  much  attention  to  social  affairs. 
As  was  brought  out  in  an  investigation  of  one  hundred  and  twenty- 
five  high  schools  in  a  middle  western  state  and  reported  by  Dr. 
Irving  King,  many  of  the  superintendents  and  principals  evidently 
considered  that  there  was  no  problem  of  this  kind  at  all  in  their 
schools,  while  others  admitted  that  the  problem  was  present,  but 
stated  that  they  were  making  no  attempt  to  co-operate  with  the 
pupils  in  building  any  kind  of  a  social  program.  Doubtless,  says 
Dr.  King,  many  shared  the  feeling  of  two  who  replied,  one  to  the 
effect  that  "he  had  no  use  for  any  such  thing,"  and  the  other  that 
there  was  ''too  blamed  much  social  life  already." 

After  the  superintendent  or  principal  has  become  immune  to 
the  "  scare  "  of  too  much  social  life,  he  manifests  a  desire  to  make 
the  school  a  social  as  well  as  an  intellectual  center  for  the  com- 
munity. In  much  of  the  social  activity,  particularly  athletics  and 
entertainments  of  various  kinds,  the  pupils  of  the  school  will 
naturally  take  the  lead,  the  patrons  of  the  community  gathering 
to  constitute  an  appreciative  and  enthusiastic  audience.  In 
certain  other  forms  of  activity,  such  as  picnics,  patriotic  meetings, 
and  meetings  pertaining  to  civic  welfare,  the  older  folk  will  often 
take  the  lead,  the  boys  and  girls  attending  with  reverence  or  with 
glee,    as    the   occasion   may   require.     The   give-and-take    spirit 


202  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

among  patrons  and  pupils  should  be  cultivated  more  than  it  is  in 
most  communities. 

Another  important  effect  of  the  "social  innoculation "  of  the 
superintendent  is  seen  in  the  improved  organization  and  super- 
vision of  his  teaching  force.  He  no  longer  is  content  to  leave  the 
young  and  inexperienced  teacher  to  flounder  about  in  a  sea  of 
uncertainties  as  to  what  constitutes  good  teaching,  but  proceeds 
by  tactful  and  helpful  means  to  further  the  training  and  improve 
the  skill  of  ever>'  teacher  under  his  supervision.  A  district  super- 
visor in  the  state  of  Ohio  related  to  the  writer  how  he  had  turned 
the  would-be  failure  of  one  of  his  teachers  into  a  splendid  success 
by  simply  relieving  her  of  her  schoolroom  duties  for  a  few  days  and 
taking  her  to  observe  the  work  of  some  of  his  better  teachers.  I 
later  verified  the  report  by  visiting  the  school  of  the  "made  over" 
teacher  and  seeing  for  myself  the  improved  work  that  was  going 
on.  At  another  time  a  county  superintendent  told  of  saving 
several  of  his  teachers  from  disgraceful  failures  by  timely  and 
sympathetic  help.  Such  a  spirit  of  helpfulness  is  based  upon  a 
deep  social  insight  into  the  nature  of  teaching  and  more  especially 
of  supervision. 

Oftentimes  a  thoroughly  socialized  superintendent  will  even 
dare  to  perform  verbal  operations  on  his  teachers  in  order  to  save 
their  professional  Hves.  This  is,  indeed,  an  unpleasant  duty,  as 
those  who  have  practiced  it  will  bear  witness;  yet  as  my  major 
professor  once  said  to  me,  after  having  giving  me  one  of  the  worst 
goings  over  I  have  ever  experienced,  "Mr.  Cummins,  if  I  were  not 
deeply  interested  in  your  future  success,  I  should  have  simply 
flunked  you  and  let  you  go."  The  socialized  administrator  is 
vicarious  and  gives  himself  in  service  to  his  teachers. 

The  socialized  superintendent  not  only  takes  his  teachers  in 
hand  for  the  purpose  of  helpful  training,  but  he  also  recognizes 
their  position  and  prerogatives.  After  each  visit  the  pupils  will 
respect  the  authority  and  leadership  of  the  teacher  all  the  more, 
because  they  observe  that  the  superintendent  himself  believes  in 
her.  On  the  other  hand  the  superintendent  who  has  not  acquired 
the  broader  social  vision  of  his  work  will  often  unthoughtfuUy 
destroy  by  a  single  visit  what  little  confidence  the  pupils  may  have 


A  COMPLETELY  SOCIALIZED  SCHOOL  203 

acquired  in  their  teacher.  We  see,  then,  that  the  sociaUzing  of 
the  superintendent  insures  the  wholesome  development  of  all  the 
general  activities  of  the  school  under  a  plan  of  teacher-supervision, 
which  is  at  once  both  positive  and  exacting,  yet  sympathetic  and 
free  from  any  trace  of  domineering,  driving,  or  drudgery. 

Apparently  I  have  completed  the  analysis  of  a  socialized  school, 
but  the  most  fundamentally  important  factor  has  been  purposely 
reserved  till  the  last.  The  reader  will  doubtless  have  in  mind  as 
the  fourth  factor  the  socializing  of  the  pupil.  While  the  pupil  is, 
of  course,  a  logical  presupposition  of  the  school,  yet  in  our  dis- 
cussion of  "A  Completely  Socialized  School"  the  pupil  is  thought 
of  as  the  material  which  is  to  be  run  through  the  mill,  so  to  speak. 
WTiat  we  are  discussing  here  is  the  socializing  of  the  "mill."  In 
order  to  complete  the  socializing  of  the  school  I  submit  finally  that 
the  school  board  should  be  socialized. 

In  a  previous  paragraph  it  was  stated  that  the  method  is  so 
closely  bound  up  with  the  teacher  that  both  must  be  considered 
as  but  two  aspects  of  the  same  thing.  So,  also,  it  may  be  stated 
that  the  school  plant  is  so  closely  related  to  the  school  board  that 
it  is  impossible  to  discuss  one  without  also  discussing  the  other. 
Indeed,  it  may  be  said,  like  school  board,  like  school  plant. 

Of  course,  it  does  not  require  a  modern  school  plant  in  order 
to  evolve  a  modern  curriculum,  but  when  it  comes  to  the  adminis- 
tering of  any  kind  of  a  curriculum  a  well-arranged  and  well- 
equipped  school  plant  is  quite  necessary.  Of  course,  a  socialized 
teacher  will  set  about  to  make  improvements  in  her  work  and  will 
manage  to  develop  in  her  pupils  social  habits  of  a  desirable  nature 
even  though  she  is  obliged  to  teach  in  a  run-down  schoolhouse. 
She  will  contrive  to  turn  the  dreariness  of  it  all  into  the  brightness 
of  sunshine,  but  the  brightness  will  necessarily  appear  in  streaks 
and  splashes,  unless  she  has  the  advantage  of  an  up-to-date  room 
in  which  to  work.  She  can  put  up  a  few  pictures  on  the  wall  and 
hang  the  wall  map  over  the  crack  in  the  blackboard,  if  there 
happens  to  be  any  wall  map  to  hang.  She  can  bring  a  bit  of  wall 
paper  to  paste  over  the  place  where  the  plaster  has  fallen  off  or 
where  the  rats  have  cut  a  hole  through  the  wall;  she  can  make  a 
pasteboard  cover  for  the  common  water  pail,  or  provide  a  new 


204  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

dipper  to  hang  at  the  pump,  but  at  best  it  will  all  constitute  but 
a  sorry  makeshift. 

Of  course,  the  superintendent  can  inaugurate  a  program  of 
athletics  by  clearing  a  patch  on  the  hillside,  or  cleaning  out  the 
loft  of  a  barn  for  basket  ball;  he  can  lay  rough  planks  on  the 
top  of  some  of  the  school  desks  and  allow  the  pupils  to  climb 
about  over  the  remainder  of  the  seats  in  an  effort  to  enjoy  a  self- 
served  dinner.  Or  he  can  work  up  an  interest  in  public  speaking, 
even  though  he  is  obliged  to  rent  an  abandoned  room  over  a  store 
in  which  to  hold  the  oratorical  contest,  or  he  can  ride  on  horseback 
over  rough  roads,  or  plow  through  the  mud  in  his  Ford  in  order  to 
bring  needed  service  to  his  teachers  who  are  scattered  throughout 
his  territory,  but  all  of  this  is  far  and  away  behind  the  progress 
of  society  and  is  but  a  sorry  makeshift.  Most  of  our  city  schools 
have  long  ago  passed  beyond  the  necessity  of  such  poor  service. 

According  to  Professor  Cubberley  and  other  school  men  of 
far-reaching  vision,  any  effort  to  improve  the  rural  schools  which 
stops  short  of  consolidation  is  but  an  effort  at  patchwork.  The 
only  adequate  method  of  improving  our  public  schools  is  to  begin 
at  the  beginning  and  this  means  to  begin  with  the  school  board. 
Given  a  coterie  of  socialized  school-board  members  in  any  section 
of  the  state  and  within  a  few  years  there  will  be  found  as  fine  a 
system  of  public  schools  as  may  be  found  in  any  city.  The  chief 
reason  why  we  have  better  schools  in  the  cities  than  in  the  rural 
districts  is  because  the  city  school  boards  have  spent  more  money 
on  their  schools.  Statistics  show  that  generally  speaking  through- 
out the  country  three  times  as  much  money  is  being  spent  on  urban 
schools  as  is  being  spent  on  rural  schools.  (It  should  be  borne  in 
mind  in  this  connection  that  villages  and  towns  of  2,500  inhabitants 
or  less  are  counted  as  rural  communities.) 

The  first  sign  of  the  socializing  of  a  school  board  is  seen  in  the 
loosening  of  the  purse  strings.  The  raising  of  teachers'  salaries 
alone  will  not  solve  the  problem.  This  will  naturally  secure  a 
better  grade  of  teacher,  but  the  better  the  teacher  the  better  the 
use  that  could  be  made  of  good  equipment  and,  vice  versa,  the 
better  the  equipment  the  better  the  teacher  that  is  needed.  "Birds 
of  a  feather  flock  together,"  and  it  is  no  less  true  of  superintendents, 


A  COMPLETELY  SOCIALIZED  SCHOOL  205 

teachers,  and  school  plants,  for  the  best  superintendents  and 
teachers  will  gravitate  toward  the  better  supported  schools. 

With  a  completely  socialized  school  board  (and  school  plant), 
curriculum,  teacher  (and  method),  and  superintendent  the  best 
possible  product,  viz.,  the  socialized  pupil,  will  logically,  though 
perhaps  not  naturally,  result.  It  must  be  remembered  that  the 
best  institutions  in  the  world,  viz.,  the  family,  the  church,  and 
the  school  all  together  cannot  succeed  in  every  case,  for  by  nature 
some  are  prone  to  evil  as  the  sparks  are  to  fly  upward.  No  institu- 
tion made  up  of  imperfect  and  fallible  human  beings  can  ever  be 
absolutely  sure  of  turning  out  an  acceptable  product  so  long  as  it 
must  deal  with  material  which  is  itself  not  absolutely  pure,  for 
"who  can  bring  a  clean  thing  out  of  an  unclean?" 

The  foregoing  discussion  may  be  summed  up  in  the  form  of  a 
few  general  principles  and  a  brief  definition  of  a  completely  social- 
ized school. 

1.  Every  community  owes  it  to  the  profession  of  teaching,  as 
well  as  to  the  rising  generation,  to  make  adequate  provision  for 
the  carrying  on  of  the  work  of  the  public  schools  in  the  most 
approved  and  up-to-date  manner — the  socialized  school  board. 

2.  Every  teacher  owes  it  both  to  herself  and  to  society  at  large 
to  render  an  increasingly  efficient  service  in  her  chosen  life-work — 
the  socialized  teacher. 

3.  The  content  of  the  curriculum  should  be  checked  up  by  the 
demand  made  in  adult  society,  but  the  organization  of  the  cur- 
riculum should  be  psychological,  i.e.,  should  be  made  to  fit  the 
mind  of  the  child  that  is  to  be  educated — the  socialized  curriculum. 

4.  The  whole  school  system  should  be  administered  according 
to  the  best  approved  business  methods  and  the  latest  word  in  the 
science  of  education — the  socialized  superintendent. 

5.  The  w^hole  environment  of  the  pupil  as  represented  by  the 
school,  home,  and  church  should  be  directed  toward  the  complete 
education  of  each  individual,  i.e.,  the  acquiring  of  such  useful 
knowledge,  right  attitudes,  and  correct  skills  as  will  function  in 
rendering  him  both  a  good  producer  and  a  good  consumer.  This 
is  the  socialized  product  that  will  logically  result  from  a  socialized 
school. 


2o6  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

Definition. — A  completely  socialized  school  is  one  in  which  the 
school  board,  the  teacher,  the  curriculum,  and  the  superintendent 
have  all  been  laid  upon  the  altar  of  child  welfare  and  dedicated  to 
their  needs,  with  a  view  of  educating  them  to  be  socially  efficient, 
i.e.,  able  to  pull  their  own  weight  in  society,  without  interfering 
with  the  rights  of  others,  and  willing  to  contribute  to  those  who 
are  less  fortunate. 


WHY  MEN  STRIKE 


JOHN  J.  B.  MORGAN 
University  of  Minnesota 


After  the  terrible  disorganization  throughout  the  civiUzed  world 
that  the  war  has  caused  one  would  suppose  that  industry  would 
be  disrupted,  that  prices  would  be  out  of  proportion  to  production, 
that  innocent  people  would  suffer,  and  that  scoundrels  would  bleed 
their  fellows;  but  the  war  cannot  be  wholly  to  blame  for  the  atti- 
tude of  the  workingman  during  this  period  of  reorganization. 
One  would  think  that  everybody  would  so  rejoice  that  the  conflict 
was  over  that  they  would  settle  down  into  their  niche  and  work 
to  bring  back  the  old  order  of  things.  Instead  we  hear  of  nothing 
but  strikes  and  labor  disputes  in  all  sorts  of  industries.  The  war 
no  doubt  precipitated  this  state  of  affairs,  but  the  cause  is  something 
more  fundamental  and  deep-seated  in  the  very  nature  of  modern 
industry.  This  reason  is  the  fact  that  the  work  of  modern  tradesmen, 
craftsmen,  and  laborers  is  so  specialized,  so  devoid  of  intrinsic  interest 
that  the  workman  finds  no  incentive  to  work  except  the  pay  he  receives. 
The  nature  of  the  daily  work  of  most  of  the  working  people  abso- 
lutely precludes  the  possibility  of  their  loving  the  work.  Most  of 
them  hate  it,  and  how  can  they  help  hating  a  job  which  means,  for 
instance,  that  they  go  through  a  set  of  motions  (which  they  learned 
in  a  very  short  time)  hundreds  of  times  a  day  with  the  prospect 
of  day  after  day,  week  after  week,  year  in  and  year  out  doing  the 
same  thing  ? 

A  common  notion  is  that  men  hate  work,  that  instinctively  they 
are  lazy.  Such  a  notion  is  itself  a  product  of  specialization  of  labor 
and  has  no  foundation  in  fact.  When  such  an  opinion  is  expressed 
what  is  meant  is  that  the  individual  does  not  readily  apply  himself 
to  the  conventional  task.  From  earliest  childhood  the  tendency 
to  activity  is  repressed.  As  long  as  the  child  is  too  weak  to  get 
off  its  back,  its  kicking,  waving  of  arms,  cooing,  and  incessant  activ- 
ity are  admired  and  no  one  wishes  to  stop  it.     When  it  gets  old 

207 


2o8  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

enough  to  meddle  with  things  its  activity  annoys  elders  and  the 
repression  begins.  He  is  penned  in  a  coop  so  that  he  cannot  dirty 
the  walls  or  pull  off  the  table  covers;  he  is  put  into  a  high  chair 
for  the  convenience  of  his  elders  and  strapped  so  that  he  will  not 
fall.  As  he  gets  older  he  is  taught  not  to  climb  trees,  not  to  play 
as  he  would  like  to,  not  to  fight  if  he  is  insulted  because  he  must 
keep  clean  and  be  a  gentleman.  When  he  gets  inquisitive  and 
asks  a  thousand  or  more  questions  he  is  told  to  keep  quiet.  His 
play  must  be  of  a  quiet,  gentlemanly,  grown-up  variety.  The  poor 
chap  has  a  hard  life  keeping  from  doing  the  things  that  he  would 
like  to  do. 

The  school  training  is  a  continuation  in  the  same  process.  He 
has  to  keep  very  quiet,  ask  nothing  but  consistent  questions,  and 
absorb  information  from  teacher  or  books.  He  must  not  waste 
his  time  studying  the  things  he  desires  to  investigate  for  they  are 
not  important.  His  elders  know  what  it  is  important  that  he 
learn  and  he  must  adhere  to  their  program.  When  he  goes  into 
the  world  and  gets  work  he  is  there  also  taught  exactly  what  he 
must  do  and  he  is  disciplined  into  doing  it.  A  good  workman  is 
one  who  gets  to  work  on  time,  does  with  some  signs  of  vigor  what  he 
is  told  to  do,  and  keeps  his  mouth  shut.  He  is  nothing  but  a  machine, 
a  machine  easier  to  handle  than  his  steam-driven  comrades  be- 
cause he  can  be  given  oral  directions  and  can  take  care  of  himself. 
He  has  the  additional  faculties  of  seeing,  hearing,  smelling,  tasting, 
and  touching,  which  to  some  employers  are  valuable.  He  is  ca- 
pable of  more  varied  reactions  than  any  other  machine  yet 
invented;  but  he  has  the  inconvenient  faculty  of  getting  sick  or 
failing  to  appear  on  time  and  is  likely  to  make  mistakes. 

No  human  being  could  possibly  be  normal  and  be  lazy  in  the 
sense  of  being  inactive.  The  lazy  man  does  things  but  does  not 
fit  into  society;  he  does  not  do  just  as  others  want  him  to  do.  A 
man  is  less  active  at  certain  periods  of  his  life  than  at  others  and 
throughout  life  more  or  less  time  has  to  be  taken  for  sleep.  There 
are  differences  in  degree  of  activity  above  the  threshold  of  laziness. 
When  we  think  of  a  lazy  man  we  get  the  picture  of  a  man  lying  in 
bed  to  an  unseemly  hour,  shirking  his  work,  and  really  less  active 
than  others.  This  is  due  to  the  fact  that  the  struggle  between  what 
he  would  like  to  do  and  what  he  ought  to  do  keeps  him  from  acting 


WHY  MEN  STRIKE  209 

at  all.  He  hates  to  do  the  conventional  thing  and  he  is  drilled 
against  the  unconventional  so  that  he  dares  not  do  it;  hence  he 
does  neither.  Laziness  is  an  abnormality  resulting  from  the  conflict 
between  desires  to  act  in  unconventional  ways  and  fear  of  the  results 
coupled  with  a  distaste  for  conventional  activity. 

What  forces  are  brought  to  bear  to  make  a  workman  constantly 
do  the  work  he  disHkes  ?  At  first  the  child  is  made  to  do  the  thing 
he  dislikes  through  physical  force;  later  such  forces  as  shame,  fear 
of  being  diilerent  from  others,  and  ambition  are  brought  to  bear 
until  finally  as  the  boy  becomes  a  man  the  economic  motive  becomes 
paramount.  He  learns  that  if  he  is  to  get  from  life  what  others  do 
he  must  get  money,  and  to  get  money  he  must  fit  into  the  scheme 
and  work  as  others  do.  When  a  man  sees  that  he  must  work  as  a 
machine  and  actually  does  it  the  distastefulness  largely  disappears. 
No  man  can  constantly  do  a  really  distasteful  thing  and  the  distaste 
remain  the  same.  He  becomes  adapted  to  it.  If  you  taste  some- 
thing sour  you  get  at  first  the  full  effect  of  the  sourness;  if  you  keep 
tasting  the  same  sour  thing  the  keenness  of  the  sensation  departs 
and  you  fail  to  notice  that  it  is  sour.  The  fact  that  the  man 
does  the  routine  job  for  so  long  makes  him  adapt  himself  to  its 
unpleasantness  and  he  forgets  that  he  dislikes  it.  The  fact  remains, 
however,  that  it  is  distasteful  and  there  is  nothing  in  the  work 
itself  that  induces  the  man  to  do  it. 

This  is  the  asset  that  labor  agitators  can  always  depend  upon. 
The  agitator  knows  that  few  men  love  their  work,  so  that  when 
times  get  a  little  abnormal  and  the  wages  that  the  men  get  will 
not  buy  as  much  as  they  would  like,  it  is  an  easy  matter  to  get  them 
in  a  frame  of  mind  where  they  will  be  wilhng  to  quit.  Why  do  not 
agitators  work  with  teachers  and  preachers  who  are  more  poorly 
paid  than  the  ordinary  workman?  For  the  simple  reason  that  a 
large  proportion  of  the  people  in  these  classes  are  in  their  work 
because  they  like  it  and  work  for  the  work's  sake;  they  would 
sacrifice  a  great  deal  before  they  would  quit. 

Men  are  induced  to  do  things  through  all  sorts  of  external 
motives,  but  master-motives  must  be  intrinsic  in  the  work  itself 
if  the  work  is  to  go  on  to  its  best  advantage.  If  the  motive  for 
work  hes  outside  the  work  the  least  resistance  or  obstacle  will 
check  it,  but  if  the  motive  is  in  the  work  itself  the  obstacle  will 


2IO  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

only  stimulate  the  individual  to  increased  efforts  to  overcome  the 
obstacle,  and  the  work  will  go  on  as  before. 

How  can  men  be  made  to  love  their  work?  With  conditions 
as  complex  as  they  are  the  situation  cannot  be  wholly  relieved. 
Men  cannot  be  left  free  to  do  as  they  choose  in  a  society  such  as 
ours.  Yet  when  the  truth  is  understood  many  improvements 
can  be  made.  When  employers  know  that  attractiveness  of  work 
is  more  important  than  pay  they  will  take  pains  to  make  the  work 
attractive.  Money  is  not  as  strong  an  incentive  as  it  is  usually 
supposed  to  he.  When  that  is  all  a  man  gets  from  his  work  of  course 
he  will  take  any  means  possible  to  get  all  he  can.  When  he  works 
from  other  motives  he  will  become  less  vividly  conscious  of  the 
amount  of  pay  he  receives. 

The  only  remedy  that  will  lastingly  overcome  this  social  unrest 
is  to  make  work  interesting  for  all  classes  from  the  laborer  to  the 
professional  man.  We  must  forever  get  rid  of  the  notion  that 
anything  interesting  is  for  that  reason  either  useless  or  conducive 
to  inefficiency.  The  old  theory  of  education  used  to  be  that  the 
duller,  uninteresting  subjects  were  better  for  the  student  than 
the  interesting  ones  because  of  the  disciplinary  value  of  making 
the  student  do  what  he  disliked.  The  modern  method,  which 
has  proven  a  better  one,  is  to  present  the  dead  subjects  in  an  inter- 
esting way.  Psychology  has  shown  that  the  way  to  do  a  thing 
quickly  and  well  is  to  become  intensely  interested  in  it.  Why 
not  make  work  interesting  ?  It  can  be  done  and  the  employer  will 
eventually  save  by  doing  it. 

If  work  is  to  be  made  interesting  the  recent  stress  upon  efficiency 
with  its  consequent  overspecialization  will  have  to  be  curtailed. 
To  be  constantly  stressing  the  quantity  and  quaHty  of  work  done 
is  to  furnish  a  superficial  external  drive.  The  extra  pay  that  the 
man  gets  will  at  first  look  large  but  it  will  appear  less  and  less, 
especially  when  the  scheme  becomes  more  widely  used  and  all  men 
get  more  pay.    The  incentive  will  fail  and  the  workmen  rebel. 

Enough  variation  must  be  left  in  each  man's  job  to  kill  the 
monotony. 

Each  man  should  be  taught  about  his  job  in  relation  to  the 
others  so  that  he  will  feel  that  he  is  a  vital  part  of  the  organi- 
zation. 


WHY  MEN  STRIKE  21 1 

Each  man  should  clearly  see  a  possible  route  for  promotion. 
If  a  man  is  hired  as  a  stoker  with  a  beginning  salary  of  so  much, 
with  the  promises  of  periodical  raises  until  a  certain  point  is  reached, 
all  incentive  for  good  work  is  killed  in  that  man.  He  must  be 
able  to  see  where  he  could  go  beyond  the  stage  of  being  a  stoker. 
It  does  not  matter  if  the  man  has  but  one  chance  in  a  thousand  of 
making  a  certain  step,  let  him  know  he  has  that  chance  and  he 
will  inevitably  try  to  be  the  one. 

When  we  were  training  our  great  national  army  each  man  was 
continually  told  that  his  job  was  important  in  the  winning  of  the 
war;  he  was  taught  to  love  his  job,  the  distasteful  job  of  drilling. 
Besides  he  was  filled  with  an  ambition  to  do  his  best  because  he 
was  shown  the  proper  steps  to  gain  promotion  and  saw  others 
being  promoted  through  tests  of  merit.  After  the  signing  of  the 
armistice  no  one  felt  that  he  was  vitally  necessary  and  to  cap  this 
the  War  Department  stopped  all  promotions.  The  spirit  of  the 
soldiers  dropped  like  lead  and  it  was  almost  impossible  to  get  any- 
thing done.  "What  is  the  use  since  the  war  is  over  and  I  have  no 
chance  of  any  promotion?"  was  the  cry. 

All  promotions  should  be  based  on  merit  alone  and  in  such  a  way 
that  every  employee  is  convinced  that  it  is  merit  alone  that  counts. 
Tell  him  what  qualities  are  used  in  judging  whether  a  man  is  to  be 
promoted  or  not.     Frankness  on  this  one  subject  will  work  wonders. 

Not  only  should  the  man  be  given  a  square  deal  but  pains  should 
be  taken  that  he  knows  that  he  is  being  fairly  treated,  not  by 
blatant  advertising  but  by  open  straightforward  organization. 
An  employer  may  shower  gifts  upon  his  men  in  the  way  of  recreation 
rooms,  extra  hoHdays,  bonuses,  etc.,  but  if  he  is  not  manifestly 
fair  the  men  will  spurn  his  gifts  and  believe  that  he  is  trying  to 
appease  them  for  having  robbed  them. 

When  the  workman  was  an  artisan  he  was  interested  in  the 
efi&ciency  of  the  process  in  which  he  was  engaged  and  took  pride 
in  the  handling  of  his  tools.  Today  the  machine  is  the  artisan  and 
the  workman  the  tool,  and  no  intelligent  man  can  take  an  interest 
in  being  an  efficient  tool.  The  present  industrial  unrest  will  not 
cease  until  tJie  workman  is  studied  as  a  human  organism  with  the 
purpose  in  mind  of  giving  him  some  interest  in  his  work  besides  the 
pay  he  receives. 


PROGRESS  AND  THE  CONSTRUCTIVE  INSTINCTS 


G.  R.  DAVIES 
Princeton  University 


Modern  psychology  does  not  recognize  any  clear  boundary 
line  between  instinct  and  intelligence.  Each  is  an  expression  of 
the  same  Kfe-energy  seeking  an  adaptation  to  environment.  It 
is  true  that  the  power  of  making  and  imitating  reasoned  adapta- 
tions is  the  unique  characteristic  of  human  evolution,  yet  this 
power  is  but  a  gradual  flowering  of  the  instinctive  urge  displayed 
throughout  the  animal  kingdom.  Through  intelligence  man  has 
satisfied  more  abundantly  his  primal  wants,  and  has  learned  new 
wants.  His  systematized  reactions  to  his  natural  surroundings 
and  his  institutional  co-operations  with  his  fellows  are,  then,  evo- 
lutionary outgrowths  from  the  instinctive  and  intuitional  core  of 
the  common  heredity. 

It  follows  that  civilizations,  though  mediated  by  intelligence, 
are  as  much  natural  products  as  the  forests.  It  was  not  due  to 
whim,  but  to  an  innate  necessity,  that  when  man  outgrew  mentally 
his  tribal  communism  he  created  property  civilizations.  Given 
the  addition  of  intelligence  to  the  urge  of  instinct,  and  the  result 
was  as  inevitable  as  the  maturing  of  the  brooded  egg.  Because 
of  its  organic  nature  there  was  a  typical  structural  symmetry 
about  the  social  whole  that  the  law  of  property  and  status  reared. 
Hereditary  rights  to  wealth  served  as  a  basis  upon  which  to  grow 
the  balanced  gradations  of  power  from  serf  to  noble  and  king. 
The  social  organism  may  be  said  to  have  acquired  a  vertebrate 
form  and  a  brain.  The  protoplasmic  mass  of  tribal  life  was 
speedily  swallowed  by  the  new  order,  and  the  ancient  empires 
came  into  being.  Admittedly  the  biological  analogy  may  be  over- 
worked, yet  the  figure  graphically  sets  forth  the  facts. 

Similarly  every  conspicuous  advance  of  civilization  is  a  con- 
sequence of  instinctive  energies  thrown  into  new  channels  by 
increasing  mentality.     Just  what,  in  a  primary  sense,  is  respon- 


PROGRESS  AND  CONSTRUCTIVE  INSTINCTS  213 

sible  for  the  awakening  powers  is  a  baffling  problem.  Various 
writers  have  professed  to  see  the  cause  in  physiographic  environ- 
ment, race,  religion,  political  principles,  and  so  on.  Yet  the 
natural  environment  seems  an  occasion  rather  than  a  cause,  and 
the  social  factors  are  manifestations  of  the  more  elemental  force. 
Without  attempting  to  pass  upon  so  elusive  a  problem,  it  may 
be  sufficient  for  present  purposes  simply  to  observe  that  certain 
environmental  conditions  of  resources  and  communication  serve 
to  stimulate  the  latent  racial  capacities.  A  constructive  instinct, 
radiating  into  invention  and  managerial  ability  is  aroused.  The 
awakening  spreads  by  a  process  of  crowd  suggestion  from  indi- 
vidual to  individual,  until  a  tidal  movement  of  humanity  is  initi- 
ated. Such  an  activity  of  the  social  mind  is  the  creative  agent 
in  cultural  evolution.  It  sweeps  from  its  path  the  cobwebs  of 
exploitation  and  superstition  as  it  creates  freer  and  more  produc- 
tive institutions.  Into  the  inner  nature  of  this  collective  spirit 
it  is  useless  for  us  to  attempt  to  penetrate,  but  its  economic  con- 
sequences and  the  obstacles  it  encounters  may  be  worthy  of  our 
attention. 

A  primary  condition  upon  which  the  organic  relationships  of 
society  depend  is  the  wide  natural  diversity  and  inequality  of 
human  nature.  It  is  this  inequality  that  makes  possible  and 
advantageous  the  division  of  labor,  and  the  subordination  of  the 
masses  to  leadership.  Biologists  have  shown  that  innate  charac- 
teristics and  abilities  vary  in  somewhat  pyramidal  proportions, 
so  that  there  is  at  all  times  the  natural  basis  for  a  kind  of  feudal 
gradation  of  classes.  Rivalry  creates  the  pressure  which  masses 
men  into  the  hierarchical  form.  Natural  differences  are  still  further 
accentuated  by  the  inevitable  fact  that  to  him  that  hath  shall  be 
given.  The  artificial  gradations  of  society  follow  upon  the  natural 
gradations. 

When  a  dynamic  advance  of  society  is  nascent,  men  of  superior 
natural  ability  in  the  groups  affected  are  developed  to  give  direction 
to  the  movement.  These  leaders  may  assume  a  variety  of  aspects, 
according  to  their  individual  capacities  and  the  tendencies  of  the 
times.  In  so  far  as  the  movement  demands  ideaHstic  impulse, 
they  may  be  preachers  or  philosophers,  such  as  the  early  Protestant 


214  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

clergy,  and  the  classical  economists.  In  so  far  as  the  demand  is 
for  political  readjustment,  they  may  be  soldiers  and  statesmen, 
such  as  the  founders  of  the  American  nation.  But  such  leadership 
is  ephemeral.  Though  vital  to  a  movement  and  expressive  of  its 
intensest  energies,  the  work  is  quickly  done,  and  the  phrases  that 
stirred  men's  souls  degenerate  into  formalism.  The  substantial 
work  is  done  by  economic  leaders,  such  as  the  commercial  and 
landed  aristocracy  which  rose  from  the  middle  class  in  England 
as  a  consequence  of  the  Reformation,  and  the  capitalistic  classes 
which  have  secured  an,  as  yet  somewhat  precarious,  ascendancy 
during  the  past  century  or  two.  Since  man  organizes  his  everyday 
world  about  the  supremacy  of  capital,  it  is  in  the  economic  field 
that  the  tissues  of  the  social  organism  are  created.  In  this  respect 
there  is  an  identity  of  process  in  social  growth  since  the  disappear- 
ance of  the  tribal  communisms. 

No  social  element  is  more  wilfully  misunderstood  than  capital. 
It  is  certainly  not  to  be  apprehended  by  the  mere  statement  of 
figures  in  a  ledger,  for  it  is  essentially  an  expression  of  human 
organization.  It  means  that  those  men  who  have  developed  prac- 
tical intelligence  in  business  management  have  secured  authority 
over  those  who  are  less  matured  and  those  who  have  specialized 
more  narrowly.  The  administration  of  capital  is  the  government 
of  men  in  their  industrial  life.  The  frontier,  where  men  disperse 
over  a  new  area,  brings  a  temporary  disintegration  and  equality, 
but  integration  sooner  or  later  sets  in,  and  a  new  leadership  is 
elevated  to  a  height  commensurate  with  the  widened  base  of  the 
social  pyramid.  In  the  large  scale  banking  and  business  con- 
nections of  the  present  day  the  world  is  experiencing  the  inevitable 
reaction  following  the  vast  territorial  expansions,  both  commerical 
and  racial,  of  the  Industrial  Revolution.  The  basic  fact  is  not, 
however,  the  centralization  of  wealth,  but  the  growing  interdepend- 
ence of  industrial  organization. 

We  may  see  in  the  concrete  the  administrative  function  of 
capital  if  we  consider  the  methods  by  which  wealth  is  attained. 
Fortunes  are  not  accumulated  by  the  penurious  saver  of  money,  but 
by  the  dynamic  organizer  of  business.  The  apparent  exceptions, 
where  wealth  is  derived  purely  from  speculative  chance,  do  not 


PROGRESS  AND  CONSTRUCTIVE  INSTINCTS  215 

invalidate  the  rule.  The  business  leader  who  has  acquired  through 
experience  the  requisite  standing  throws  his  energies  into  some 
promising  undertaking  that  will  serve  the  public  needs,  as  the 
manufacture  of  a  staple  commodity  or  the  building  of  a  railroad. 
He  pays  interest  on  borrowed  capital  and  builds  up  his  own  fortune 
through  his  skill  in  putting  men  effectively  at  work.  His  invested 
capital,  stated  in  terms  of  stock  and  bond  quotations,  rests  in 
fact  upon  the  organized  energies  of  busy  workers  in  factories,  or 
of  construction  gangs  wrestling  to  bring  the  wilderness  under  con- 
trol. The  movement  of  capital  into  this  or  that  industry  is  in 
reality  the  movement  of  laborers  and  the  products  of  labor.  The 
active  capitalist  marshals  the  industrial  host.  Small  investors 
turn  over  to  the  abler  man  the  minor  industrial  control  they 
have  acquired.  So,  as  trade  relations  ramify,  requiring  ever  finer 
co-ordinations  in  manufacture  and  distribution,  leaders  of  higher 
potentiality  are  produced.  It  is  only  in  abstraction  that  the 
dynamic  fact  of  leadership  becomes  the  static  fact  of  property  rights. 

A  nation  in  which  a  spirit  of  intelligent  enterprise  rules  may 
be  called  a  functional  society.  The  term  implies  that  each  indi- 
vidual subordinates  himself  to  the  attainment  of  some  common 
object,  that  he  serves  others  as  he  also  is  served  through  the  pro- 
cesses of  trade  and  through  the  development  of  his  productive 
estate.  In  economic  terms  the  completely  functional  society 
would  be  one  in  which  each  citizen  was  either  training  for  or 
practicing  the  productive  arts  best  suited  to  his  capacity.  It 
would  be  a  society  that  fostered  leadership,  so  as  to  secure  for 
its  own  direction  and  for  the  control  of  its  departments  and  sub- 
departments  the  best  executive  talent  it  afforded.  Thus  it  would 
exemplify  co-ordinated  team  work  throughout.  It  would  have 
weight  and  momentum  in  its  directed  movements  because  of  the 
complete  employment  of  each  able-bodied  citizen.  By  such  employ- 
ment it  would  also  utilize  all  available  capital  power,  for  waste 
would  be  eliminated  and  surplus  wealth  reinvested. 

In  picturing  the  functional  society  thus  at  its  Utopian  fulfil- 
ment, we  need  not  impute  to  it  any  undue  Spartan  severity.  Relax- 
ation, amusement,  and  aesthetic  joy  in  work  are  elements  of  social 
art.     They  therefore  would  be  suitably  provided  for.     Indeed,  a 


21 6  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

functional  ordering  of  society  would  indirectly  fulfil  the  require- 
ments of  a  pure  hedonistic  philosophy,  since  it  would  satisfy  to 
the  greatest  possible  degree  the  instincts  of  mankind,  the  deepest 
of  which  are  the  inventive  and  organizing  faculties  of  intelligent 
construction.  Man  is  happiest  when  he  spends  himself  in  endeavors 
that  link  him  in  a  common  enthusiasm  with  his  fellows  and  with 
the  future  of  the  race.  To  be  used  by  the  creative  social  mind 
is  to  have  lived.  Hence,  the  more  functional  a  nation  becomes, 
the  more  it  succeeds  in  the  pursuit  of  happiness. 

It  must  be  admitted  that  a  state  of  society  in  which  men  are 
consciously  members  one  of  another  in  a  living  social  organism  is 
something  seldom  attained.  Only  rarely,  in  vital  moments,  is  any 
considerable  volume  of  population  so  fused.  Perhaps  a  state  of 
war,  so  far  as  the  situation  within  a  belligerent  country  is  con- 
cerned, approximates  the  most  closely  such  an  ideal,  but  it  is  a 
negation  of  the  ideal  in  its  rupture  of  the  wider  social  relations. 
More  satisfactory  as  a  suggestion  of  an  ideal  social  organization, 
though  lacking  somewhat  in  systematic  leadership,  is  an  expand- 
ing democracy  such  as  that  which  America  has  typified  to  the 
world.  Here  the  joy  of  building  a  nation  has  been  intensified  by 
the  escape  from  old-world  conventionalities,  and  by  the  effective- 
ness of  accumulated  knowledge  in  the  face  of  rich  natural  resources. 
Similarly  every  great  forward  movement  of  society  has  been  demo- 
cratic and  functional.  Witness  the  social  spirit  of  the  Greeks  and 
the  constitutionalism  of  the  EngKsh. 

Inherent  in  the  very  nature  of  social  growth,  particularly  in 
the  economic  aspects,  there  may  be  discovered  from  the  first,  certain 
subtle  forces  which  eventually  may  mature  into  paralysis  or  con- 
flict. The  social  organism  might  almost  be  said  to  be  subject  to 
a  structural  cycle  corresponding  to  the  aging  process  in  the  indi- 
vidual. Superficially  there  may  appear  no  such  fatality  attaching 
to  the  grouping  of  men  as  to  the  grouping  of  the  body  cells,  yet 
in  the  past  the  fatality  has  proved  almost  as  binding.  The  easy 
optimism  which  scorns  the  danger  is  based  upon  an  ignorance  of 
the  intricacies  of  economic  law. 

The  difi&culty  is  not  merely  that  economic  law  is  inherent  in 
human  nature,  in  the  vulgar  sense  that  each  man  seeks  his  own 


PROGRESS  AND  CONSTRUCTIVE  INSTINCTS  217 

profit  in  trade.  If  this  were  all,  we  might  expect  a  speedy  solution 
of  the  historic  tangle,  since  man  is  instinctively  altruistic  in  a 
considerable  degree.  But  economic  law  is  something  far  more 
significant  than  individual  selfishness.  It  is  nothing  less  than  the 
mode  of  adaptation  of  the  social  organism  to  a  physiographic 
environment.  It  denotes  an  organization  of  industry  under  the 
sway  of  capital  ownership,  and  a  rule  for  the  distribution  of  the 
products.  No  other  practicable  basis  for  industry  has  yet  been 
discovered,  nor  appears  in  sight. 

Briefly  stated,  economic  law  adapts  itself  to  industrial  require- 
ments in  a  stage  of  rapid  growth,  for  the  following  reasons.  It 
stimulates  activity  by  competition  for  desirable  prizes.  It  throws 
men  upon  their  own  resources  to  find  their  places,  whether  among 
the  leaders  or  in  the  ranks.  It  allows  men  of  ability  to  rise  into 
the  expanding  occupations  and  professions  created  by  invention, 
thus  raising  the  level  of  common  wages.  It  is  true  that  the  transi- 
tion to  a  new  economy  may  bring  suffering  to  those  lacking  the 
power  of  quick  readaptation,  as  notoriously  was  the  case  in  England 
at  the  advent  of  the  Industrial  Revolution.  But  the  more  perma- 
nent effect  is  the  improvement  of  the  conditions  of  labor  through 
the  more  effective  bidding  of  capital.  With  the  relaxing  of  the 
pressure  of  population,  so  keenly  felt  in  static  periods,  the  stir  of 
new  Hfe  reaches  to  the  very  social  depths.  Further,  the  economic 
postulates  of  freedom  of  contract  and  the  right  of  possession  appeal 
to  the  energetic  with  the  axiomatic  force  of  the  moral  law,  and 
so  serve  as  a  fundamental  basis  of  agreement. 

The  lure  of  individualistic  opportunity  during  a  time  of  economic 
progress  is  greatly  enhanced  because  of  the  rapid  increase  in  capital 
properties.  The  new  wealth  is  broadly  distributed  among  the 
enterprising  and  creative,  and  even  enriches  the  more  passive  prop- 
erties through  an  increased  demand.  Hence  any  hostility  to 
property  as  privilege  that  may  linger  from  a  more  monopolistic 
epoch  is  disarmed.  The  pursuit  of  wealth  is  accepted  as  the 
normal  end  of  existence. 

The  gateways  of  individual  opportunity  are  kept  open  long 
after  the  subsidence  of  the  initial  innovating  impulse  by  the  spread- 
ing of  the  movement  beyond  the  national  boundaries.    A  country 


2i8  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

that  has  reached  a  conspicuously  high  level  of  the  industrial  arts 
is  like  a  city  set  on  a  hill.  It  becomes  a  model  of  imitation  for 
its  more  backward  neighbors,  who  seek  its  trade,  copy  its  ways, 
and  invite  it  to  bring  in  permanently  its  goods  and  ways  by  the 
investment  of  capital.  Or,  if  a  fickle  attitude  oppose,  an  entrance 
may  be  forced.  As  the  wave  of  progress  spreads,  the  financial 
power  of  the  center  may  rise  to  imperial  proportions.  Such  is 
the  beneficent  operation  of  economic  law,  accompKshing  by  a 
seemingly  unsystematic  growth  a  result  that  could  not  have  been 
attained  by  conscious  planning. 

Yet,  axiomatic  as  the  laws  of  trade  may  be,  no  more  subtle 
trap  has  Nature  ever  laid  for  the  unwary'.  It  has  been  well  said 
that  with  the  law  came  death.  For,  when  the  tide  of  progress 
ebbs,  as  almost  certainly  it  must  do  at  times,  then  economic  law 
changes  into  a  tyrant.  Just  why  the  creative  impulse  should  at 
times  weaken  is  unexplainable.  As  we  cannot  tell  whence  it  comes, 
so  we  cannot  say  whither  or  why  it  goeth.  All  we  know  is  that  the 
driving  power  of  the  constructive  instincts  becomes  temporarily  in- 
adequate in  the  face  of  natural  obstacles,  such  as  scarcity  of  resources 
or  barriers  to  further  trade  contacts.  Then,  from  the  spontaneous 
operation  of  economic  law,  quite  a  new  set  of  phenomena  arise. 

As  soon  as  progress  slackens,  the  pathways  inviting  the  indi- 
vidual to  the  heights  begin  to  be  blocked.  The  established  pro- 
fessions are  filled  mainly  by  the  sons  of  the  prosperous,  who  have 
first  access  to  the  requisite  education.  Property,  no  longer  increas- 
ing rapidly  in  quantity,  comes  to  be  highly  valued,  and  is  held 
tenaciously  in  hereditarv'  possession.  In  default  of  the  beneficent 
eft'ects  of  expanding  production,  wages  fall  with  the  increase  of 
population.  Contrasts  of  luxury  and  poverty  therefore  begin  to 
obtrude.  There  is  an  envious  striving  among  the  middle  and 
lower  classes  to  imitate  the  luxury-spending  of  the  rich,  with  a 
consequent  waste  and  demoralization.  Insensibly  the  ties  of 
idealism,  sentiment,  and  patriotism  which  have  united  the  people 
in  a  common  spirit  of  endeavor  give  way.  Group  feeling  prevails, 
throwing  the  owning  classes  into  semi-monopolistic  alliances,  and 
employees  into  aggressively  hostile  federations.  Energies  that  once 
were  expended  in  work  now  are  wasted  in  strife. 


PROGRESS  AND  CONSTRUCTIVE  INSTINCTS  219 

Just  as  success  is  stimulated  by  reason  of  success,  so  discord 
is  increased  by  discord.  Indeed,  so  striking  are  the  effects  arising 
from  the  psychological  attitude  of  the  public  that  this  attitude  is 
often  taken  as  an  original  cause.  It  is  a  cause,  but  only  a  secondary 
one,  consequent  upon  some  subtler  paralysis  that  has  reversed  the 
operation  of  economic  law.  So  the  evil  cycle  turns  on  itself;  strife 
further  retards  progress,  and  retardation  further  intensifies  the  con- 
ditions that  cause  strife.  Ancient  civilizations  are  a  witness  to 
the  fact  that  a  failure  to  maintain  progress  means  finally  a  retro- 
gression to  militaristic  despotism.  As  a  result  of  the  continued 
disorders  the  strong  man  is  at  length  welcomed  as  the  only  alterna- 
tive to  anarchy.  The  nation  then  comes  to  an  equilibrium  on 
the  basis  of  an  established  ruling  class,  and  in  the  clash  of  con- 
flicting international  interests  a  similar  gradation  of  dependency 
is  generated.  Such  is  the  spontaneous  succession  of  events  aris- 
ing from  human  nature  and  economic  law  when  the  dynamic 
impulse  fails.  The  fluid  progress  of  modern  times  has  made  us 
forget  that  the  same  tendencies  on  a  vastly  greater  scale  are  latent 
also  in  present-day  society,  and  indeed  are  not  entirely  quiescent. 

So  unobtrusively  does  the  dynamic  impulse  subside  that  prac- 
tical men  stubbornly  refuse  to  recognize  any  change.  The  laws 
remain  the  same,  the  rights  of  liberty  and  property  are  still  guaran- 
teed, trade  and  the  amassing  of  wealth  seem  to  go  on  much  as 
before.  But  an  economic  system  in  which  a  spirit  of  enterprise 
and  industry  prevails,  is  not  the  same  as  one  in  which  that  spirit 
has  declined.  When  the  dynamic  energies  relax,  the  functions  of 
owner,  manager,  and  worker  draw  wider  apart.  The  owner 
becomes  the  absentee  investor,  eventually  having  little  knowledge 
of  or  personal  interest  in  the  projects  from  which  he  derives  his 
income.  The  constructive  instinct  which  drove  the  former  owner 
to  live  simply  and  devote  his  surplus  to  the  expansion  of  business 
is  now  replaced  by  what  the  economist  calls  "time-preference"; 
that  is,  the  willingness  to  invest  only  in  view  of  a  certain  promised 
rate  of  interest.  True,  time-preference  was  implicitly  present  in 
the  earlier  stage,  in  that  the  business  leader  was  investing  his 
time  and  labor  for  results  to  be  realized  in  the  future.  But  the 
abstract  preference   for   futures   is   a   poor  substitute  for  direct 


220  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

participation  in  industry.  So  it  happens  that  mature  financial 
nations  pay  to  investors  far  more  interest  in  a  year  than  they 
receive  back  in  increased  savings — yet  interest  is  ostensibly  justified 
as  the  necessary  inducement  for  obtaining  a  supply  of  new  capital. 
The  interest  income  going  to  property  becomes,  therefore,  an 
accumulating  liabiHty  to  society  as  a  whole.  Outwardly  the  prop- 
erty relation  is  as  before,  but  the  inward  change  of  spirit  has 
changed  the  essence  of  the  fact. 

A  certain  economic  paradox  may  be  observed  in  respect  to  the 
shifting  of  the  interest  rate.  It  is  generally  assumed  on  the  basis 
of  limited  comparisons  that  a  high  interest  rate  is  a  sign  of  extrava- 
gance, and  a  low  rate  is  a  sign  of  thrift.  Yet  the  dynamic  period 
is  most  likely  to  be  a  period  of  high  interest,  as  may  be  discovered 
in  a  growing  frontier  region;  while  a  static  period  of  leisure  class 
display  may  be  a  time  of  very  low  interest.  The  paradox  is 
explained  by  the  observation  that  what  makes  interest  possible 
is  not  simply  the  fact  of  a  readiness  to  invest  at  low  rates.  Such 
a  readiness  may  be  merely  the  reflex  of  the  high  value  set  upon 
hereditary  properties  during  static  periods.  Interest  incomes  are 
initially  produced  and  are  expanded  as  a  direct  result  of  the  growth 
of  practical  intelligence.  When  the  brains  of  managers  and  inven- 
tors are  fertile,  newly  invested  capital  becomes  an  innovating 
machine  or  process,  producing  income  sufficient  both  to  bid  up 
wages  and  to  pay  generous  interest.  It  is  this  marginal  rate  which 
determines,  by  inversion,  the  capitalized  values  of  established  prop- 
erties. Later,  when  progress  has  halted,  and  the  methods  of 
industry  have  been  reduced  to  settled  routine,  the  established 
properties  will  be  bid  up  to  a  high  figure  by  the  eagerness  of  inves- 
tors, the  natural  outlet  for  savings  being  closed.  The  resulting 
low  interest  rate  should  serve  as  an  incentive  to  business,  but  it 
may  utterly  fail  to  stimulate  that  innovating  self-reliance  and 
spontaneity  upon  which  progress  depends.  The  timid  invest- 
ment by  proxy  on  the  part  of  a  class  absorbed  in  the  luxurious 
expenditure  of  its  investment  incomes  cannot  hope  to  get  the 
results  obtained  by  the  enthusiastic  ability  of  the  pioneering  enter- 
prisers. 


PROGRESS  AND  CONSTRUCTIVE  INSTINCTS  221 

A  further  observation  may  be  made  regarding  the  hereditary 
class  that  ocmes  to  receive  the  wealth  income  of  society.  The 
evil  connected  with  such  a  functionless  class  is  not  necessarily 
proportionate  to  the  size  of  the  fortunes.  A  large  number  of  small 
fortunes  may  dissipate  social  energies  more  effectively  than  a  few 
great  ones.  The  evils  of  functionless  ownership,  and  conversely 
the  benefits  of  administrative  ownership,  depend  upon  the  spirit 
and  ability  of  the  owners.  Hence  the  growth  of  a  relatively  few 
immense  fortunes  may  immediately  be  a  decidedly  wholesome  sign, 
for  they  may  be  the  expression  of  a  timely  large-scale  organization. 
A  functionless  condition  is  likely  to  be  generated  by  the  inheritance 
of  these  fortunes,  but  a  redistribution  would  not  necessarily  change 
the  situation.  Small  fortunes  may  have  been  functional,  as  a  rule, 
under  former  conditions  of  small  proprietorships,  but  the  case  is 
different  under  modern  corporate  organization. 

It  does  not  need  to  be  argued  that  a  progressive  nation  in  whose 
activities  all  individuals  have  a  functional  place,  constitutes  the 
goal  to  be  striven  for.  Such  a  goal  is  implied  in  the  modern  con- 
ception of  democracy.  But  how  is  it  to  be  permanently  gained? 
Is  there  for  the  nation  a  fountain  of  perpetual  youth  ?  May  eternal 
life  be  socially  attained  ? 

At  this  point  the  speculative  mind  is  tempted  into  Utopian 
dreams.  Why  should  not  some  mechanical  socialism  be  devised 
to  prevent  the  gradual  growth  of  functionless  classes  ?  Experience 
has  answered  the  question.  As  a  matter  of  fact,  socialistic  experi- 
ments have  never  made  a  successful  appeal  to  the  constructive 
instincts.  Theoretical  considerations,  also,  give  just  as  conclu- 
sive an  answer  when  once  the  immense  obstacles  are  fairly  faced. 
National  socialism  would  leave  the  distribution  of  income  to  the 
whim  of  popular  majorities.  Syndicalism  might  possibly  distribute 
the  income  of  the  local  group  in  proportion  to  services,  but  the 
group  on  highly  valuable  land  would  then  be  privileged  in  com- 
parison with  other  groups.  Attempts  to  adjust  matters  through 
price  regulation  or  through  control  of  the  migration  of  labor  would 
lead  into  endless  difficulties,  breaking  the  uniformity  of  markets, 
or  interfering  with  efficient  production.     So  complex  is  modern 


222  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

industry  that  the  opening  of  new  wheat  lands,  for  example,  registers 
itself  partly  in  the  rise  of  real  estate  values  in  the  distant  metrop- 
olis. What  device  could  ever  secure  for  the  producer  of  the  new 
wealth  the  exact  reward  of  his  services  ? 

All  schemes  for  the  artificial  distribution  of  income  encounter 
the  fundamental  question,  Who  in  reality  is  the  creator  of  wealth  ? 
Is  it  the  inventor  whose  brain  conceived  the  method,  the  manager 
who  put  it  into  execution,  the  investor  whose  savings  allowed  the 
manager  scope,  the  working  masses  whose  subordination  to  indus- 
trial discipline  was  essential  to  production,  or  Mother  Earth  who 
gave  the  environmental  conditions  and  the  raw  material?  The 
process  of  production  is  evidently  organic:  the  real  Creator  is  the 
Spirit  of  the  whole.  An  artificial  system  of  control  capable  of 
directing  in  detail  so  subtle  an  organism  as  modern  industry  does 
not  lie  within  the  reach  of  man's  present  powers. 

Yet  the  impossibility  of  an  immediate  reorganization  of  society 
does  not  at  all  leave  us  hopeless.  The  constructive  instincts  are 
at  all  times  latent  and  may  be  aroused  by  appropriate  means. 
They  manifest  themselves  as  a  fusion  of  moral  enthusiasm  and 
practical  intelligence,  or  applied  science.  They  may  be  stimulated, 
therefore,  by  a  clarifying  of  the  moral  perspective  and  by  a  foster- 
ing regard  for  science. 

It  should  be  possible  greatly  to  clarify  the  public  conception 
of  morality  in  its  economic  implications.  It  is  readily  seen  that 
the  functional  relation  to  society  is  the  basis  of  morality.  The 
good  individual  is  the  one  who  subordinates  himself  to  that  Super- 
Mind,  latent  in  the  universe,  whose  partial  but  growing  revelation 
is  the  whole  body  of  truth,  including  the  basic  social  institu- 
tions. So  also  the  good  man  will  love  his  neighbor  as  himself, 
for  he  will  recognize  the  unity  of  interests.  An  aggressive  preach- 
ing of  these  long-established  axioms  of  social  righteousness  will 
stir  the  laggards  and  shame  the  wasters.  Loafers  may  be  goaded 
to  productive  labor,  and  the  privileged  turned  from  frivolities  to 
business  or  to  political  and  social  problems. 

In  relation  to  economic  progress,  devotion  to  science  is  of  the 
utmost  importance.  There  ought  to  be  a  clearer  recognition  of 
the  essentially  religious,  as  well  as  utilitarian,  aspects  of  material 


PROGRESS  AND  CONSTRUCTIVE  INSTINCTS  223 

science.  The  scientist  is  a  devotee  of  the  spirit  of  truth,  perhaps 
in  a  partial  sense,  yet  in  a  vital  sense,  nevertheless.  Research  in 
the  biological  and  physical  sciences  has  already  added  incalculable 
wealth  to  the  world,  and  the  social  sciences  should  be  capable  of 
no  less  worthy  a  contribution.  Research,  amply  endowed,  will 
constitute  the  vanguard  of  a  rapid  advance,  leading  to  the  creation 
of  new  wealth,  opening  wide  the  gates  of  opportunity  to  the  ambi- 
tious, and  rewarding  amply  the  useful  toiler. 

There  remains  to  be  noted  one  essential  motive  power  of  a 
dynamic  society — faith  in  the  coming  ideal.  It  is  evident  that 
the  world  has  not  attained  its  final  organization.  In  fact  it  has 
not  penetrated  much  deeper  into  the  nature  of  justice  than  had 
the  ancient  Greeks  and  Romans.  Easy  conditions  of  rapid  growth 
have  made  it  careless.  In  many  respects  it  is  less  socially 
intelligent — less  aware  of  the  difficulties  of  social  organization — 
than  were  the  ancient  Hebrews.  With  a  quickened  conscience  and 
a  conviction  of  social  sin  there  must  be  born  a  faith  that  is  a  lay- 
ing hold  on  things  to  come.  For — let  us  believe  it  with  all  the 
assurance  of  scientific  insight — there  must  eventually  dawn  upon 
humanity  such  an  illumination  of  the  spirit  of  good  will  as  shall 
utterly  transform  this  saddened  and  disillusioned  earth.  In  the 
Christian  spirit  has  been  laid  the  moral  basis,  and  in  the  scientific 
spirit  lies  the  promise  of  power.  The  Kingdom  will  come;  in 
the  vision  and  charity  of  the  believing  soul  it  is  already  here. 


THE  AMERICAN  COUNCIL  OF  LEARNED  SOCIETIES 

International  co-operation  in  the  fields  of  the  humanistic 
sciences,  with  the  United  States  forced  to  abstain  from  participation 
because  of  the  lack  of  a  central  academy  of  such  sciences — such 
was  the  situation  in  existence  until  the  formation  of  the  American 
Council  of  Learned  Societies  in  September,  1919.  In  1900  at 
Paris  there  had  been  established  the  International  Association 
of  Academies,  including  both  humanistic  and  strictly  scientific 
branches.  Here  America  was  represented  by  the  National  Acad- 
emy of  Sciences,  but  this  unfortunately  was  not  at  all  concerned 
with  the  studies  of  such  subjects  as  sociology,  history,  political 
science,  economics,  and  philosophy.  Great  Britain  also  was 
represented  only  in  the  field  of  the  physical  sciences  through  the 
Royal  Society.  But  this  lack  was  made  up  in  1902  by  the  for- 
mation of  the  British  Academy  for  the  Promotion  of  Historical, 
Philosophical,  and  Philological  Studies.  No  such  society  was 
established  in  America. 

The  war  broke  up  this  International  Association,  but  in  19 18 
it  was  re-established  in  so  far  as  the  physical  sciences  were  con- 
cerned by  the  formation  of  the  International  Research  Council. 
Later  a  conference  resulted  in  the  formation  of  the  International 
Union  of  Academies  (Union  Academique  Internationale)  for  the 
furthering  of  the  humanistic  studies.  M.  Emile  Senart  of  the 
Academy  of  Inscriptions  and  Belles  Lettres  was  chosen  first  presi- 
dent, and  the  regular  place  of  meeting  for  the  society  is  to  be  the 
Palais  des  Academies  at  Brussels.  In  the  first  of  these  two  organ- 
izations America  as  before  was  represented,  but  in  the  second  it 
could  not  be. 

Many  scholars,  both  here  and  abroad,  rightly  considered  this 
isolation  of  the  American  humanistic  societies  from  their  foreign 
contemporaries  to  be  unfortunate.  Chiefly  through  the  efforts 
of  Waldo  G.  Leland,  secretary  of  the  American  Historical  Asso- 
ciation, a  conference  was  therefore  called  in  September,  1919,  to 
which  thirteen  of  the  societies  of  the  proper  type  were  invited  and 

224 


THE  AMERICAN  COUNCIL  OF  LEARNED  SOCIETIES      225 

which  was  attended  by  representatives  of  ten.  A  constitution  was 
drawn  up  establishing  an  "American  Council  of  Learned  Societies 
devoted  to  Humanistic  Studies"  to  consist  of  two  delegates  from 
each  of  the  member  societies.  Eleven  of  the  eligible  societies 
have  already  voted  to  join  the  Council. 

The  first  meeting  of  the  new  council  was  held  on  February  14, 
1920,  in  New  York  and  eleven  societies  were  represented.  The 
American  Sociological  Society  was  represented  by  its  president, 
James  Q.  Dealey,  of  Brown  University.  Officers  were  elected 
and  also  two  delegates  were  chosen  to  represent  the  United  States 
at  the  May  meeting  of  the  International  Association.  The  chair- 
man of  the  Council  elected  at  this  meeting  was  Professor  Charles 
H.  Haskins,  of  Harvard  University,  a  representative  of  the  Ameri- 
can Historical  Association,  and  Professor  George  M.  Whicher,  of 
Hunter  College,  was  chosen  secretary. 

American  humanistic  societies  represented  at  this  meeting 
were  the  American  Sociological  Society,  the  American  Philosophical 
Society,  the  American  Academy  of  Arts  and  Sciences,  the  American 
Antiquarian  Society,  the  American  Philological  Association,  the 
Archaeological  Institute  of  America,  the  American  Historical 
Association,  the  American  Economic  Association,  the  American 
Political  Science  Association,  the  American  Oriental  Society,  and 
the  ^Modern  Language  Association  of  America. 

With  a  total  membership  in  its  constituent  societies  of  over 
ten  thousand  it  is  evident  that  the  American  Council  will  prove 
to  be  a  real  force  for  the  promotion  of  learning  in  this  country. 
If  in  no  other  way,  it  will  perform  some  good  at  any  rate  in  that  it 
will  bring  into  some  sort  of  unity  a  dozen  or  more  societies,  so 
naturally  akin  in  interests  and  yet  heretofore  completely  separated 
in  organization.  There  is  also  America's  share  in  international 
humanistic  tasks  to  be  considered. 

There  have  been  cases  in  which  action  by  members  of  one 
nation  by  themselves  meant  that  scholars  of  other  nations  were 
hindered  in  their  attempts  to  perform  similar  or  supplementary 
work.  Such  discrimination  will  in  the  future  be  tabooed  by  the 
International  Union.  Also  the  Union  should  prove  advantageous 
in  that  it  may  provide  a  means  for  standardizing  publications  of  a 


226  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

national  sort  but  of  international  interest,  and  in  a  uniform  manner 
collecting  in  the  different  countries  that  material  for  some  inter- 
national work  which  is  found  in  those  particular  countries. 

So  far  the  International  Union  of  Academies  or  the  U.A.I. , 
as  it  is  often  called,  includes  representatives  of  the  following  coun- 
tries besides  the  United  States:  France,  Great  Britain,  Belgium, 
the  Netherlands,  Norway,  Denmark,  Italy,  Greece,  Poland, 
Russia,  and  Japan.  Representatives  of  Spain,  Roumania,  Portugal, 
Finland,  and  Czecho-Slovakia  are  expected  to  join  soon. 


NEWS  AND  NOTES 


Notes  of  interest  to  the  readers  of  the  Journal  should  be  in  the  hands  of  the 
editor  of  "  News  and  Notes  "  not  later  than  the  tenth  of  the  month  preceding 
publication.  

Annual  Meeting  of  the  American  Sociological  Society 

The  annual  meeting  of  the  American  Sociological  Society  will  be 
held  in  Washington,  D.C.,  December  27-29  in  conjunction  with  the 
Historical  and  Political  Science  Associations. 

The  general  subject  as  tentatively  announced  is  "Constructive 
National  Movements  in  Their  Social  Aspects." 

The  following  subjects  and  writers  are  announced :  "  The  Community 
Idea  in  Rural  Development,"  Kenyon  L.  Butterfield;  "Sociological 
Evaluation  of  the  Inter-Church  World  Movement,"  Edwin  L.  Earp; 
"Psychology  of  Nationahsm,"  Max  S.  Handman;  "Sociological  Theory 
and  Practice  as  Illustrated  by  Army  Psychological  Tests,"  J.  P.  Licht- 
enberger;  "The  Future  of  Social  Science,"  Albion  W.  Small;  "Social 
Significance  of  the  New  Educational  Policy  of  the  Army,"  Scott  E.  W. 
Bedford. 

Although  not  definitely  decided,  it  is  hoped  the  following  will  be 
part  of  the  program:  "Social  Significance  of  Labor  Adjustments"; 
"Radicalism  and  Our  Social  Institutions,"  William  J.  Kirby;  "Some 
Problems  in  National  Adjustment,"  Susan  M.  Kingsbury;  "A  Theory 
of  Social  Interests,"  Roscoe  Pound. 

Two  Round  Table  Discussions  are  being  arranged.  "The  Social 
Significance  of  Psychoanalytic  Psychology,"  in  charge  of  Ernest  R. 
Groves  and  F.  Stuart  Chapin.  Three-minute  papers  by  Dr.  Phyllis 
Blanchard,  Bedford  Hills  Reformatory;  Bernard  Glueck,  New  York 
School  of  Philanthrophy;  Henry  C.  Morrison,  University  of  Chicago; 
C.  C.  Robinson,  Y.  M.  C.  A.;  Dr.  Edith  Spaulding,  and  Dr.  William  A. 
WTiite. 

The  other  Round  Table  Discussion  will  be  on  the  subject,  "  Essen- 
tials of  a  Social  Survey,"  in  charge  of  H.  S.  Bucklin  and  Shelby  M. 
Harrison.  Three-minute  papers  by  C.  J.  Galpin,  Department  of 
Agriculture;  Allen  T.  Burns,  Carnegie  Corporation;  Ernest  C.  Meyer, 
Rockefeller  Foundation. 

227 


228  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

Three  important  committees  will  report.  "Teaching  of  Social 
Science  in  the  Public  and  High  Schools,"  Ross  L.  Finney;  "Standard- 
ization cf  Research,"  J.  L.  Gillin;  "Plan  for  Preparation  of  Indexes, 
etc.,  of  Social  Science,"  F.  Stuart  Chapin. 


The  Sociological  Society  of  London 

The  editor  of  the  Sociological  Review  announces  that  the  Sociological 
Society  is  again  located  in  Westminster  where  it  was  originally  organ- 
ized. The  building  secured  for  the  offices  and  meetings  of  the  Society 
has  been  named  Leplay  House,  after  the  noted  French  social  scientist, 
LePlay.  The  spring  number  of  the  Sociological  Review  appropriately 
contains  the  first  chapters  of  a  biography  entitled  "LePlay  and  Social 
Science,"  written  by  the  late  Dorothy  Herbertson,  whose  husband,  a 
former  professor  of  geography  in  Oxford  University,  was  a  devoted 
student  of  LePlay. 

The  lectures  announced  for  the  summer  term  of  the  Society  include 
the  following:  "Exhibition  of  Methods  of  Organization,"  M.  Bruce 
Williams;  "The  Smoke  Curse  and  Our  New  Homes,"  Dr.  Saleeby; 
"Social  Finance,"  John  Ross. 

Communications  to  the  Society  should  be  addressed  to  the  Secretary, 
Mrs.  Fraser  Davies,  Leplay  House,  65  Belgrave  Road,  Westminster. 


International  Institute  of  Sociology 

The  Revue  Internationale  de  sociologie  in  a  recent  issue  calls  attention 
to  the  deaths  during  the  war  of  three  of  its  illustrious  members.  Professors 
Schmoller,  Wagner,  and  Simmel. 

Gustav  Schmoller  was  professor  of  political  economy  in  the  universi- 
ties of  Halle,  Strassburg,  and  Berlin,  and  was  recognized  as  the  leader 
of  the  group  known  as  "SociaUsts  of  the  Chair."  Schmoller  was  editor 
of  Staats-  und  Socialwissetischajtliche  Forschungen  and  Jahrbuch  fiir 
Gesetzgebung,  Verwaltung,  und  Volkswirthschaft.  Of  his  numerous  writ- 
ings, there  is  space  here  for  mention  of  only  one,  Grundriss  der  Allge- 
meinen  Volkswirtschaftslehre.  He  was  president  of  the  "Verein  fiir 
Sozialpohtik,"  and  in  1905  was  made  president  of  the  International 
Institute  of  Sociology. 

Adolph  Wagner  was  also  a  professor  of  political  economy  at  the 
University  of  Berlin.  Under  the  influence  of  the  psychological  school, 
he  diverged  from  the  theoretical  position  of  Schmoller,  who  was  inspired 


NEWS  AND  NOTES  229 

by  the  historical  school  and  state  socialism.     Each  ended  by  calling  the 
other  "mein  Hauptgegner." 

Georg  Simmel  was  originally  a  philosopher,  teaching  at  the  uni- 
versities of  Berlin  and  Strassburg.  At  a  certain  period  of  his  career 
he  devoted  himself  almost  entirely  to  sociological  work,  writing  articles 
for  the  Revue  internationale  de  sociologie  and  for  the  A  nnals  of  the  Inter- 
national Institute  of  Sociology,  of  which  he  was  a  member  from  the 
year  of  its  organization  in  1893.  The  comprehensive  formulation  of  his 
sociological  theories  was  published  in  1908  in  his  volume  Soziologie, 
many  parts  of  which  were  translated  into  English  by  Albion  W.  Small, 
and  appeared  in  the  American  Journal  of  Sociology. 


Sociology  in  the  South 

The  organization  of  a  department  of  sociology  and  school  of  social 
science  at  Tulane  University  and  the  expansion  of  the  work  in  sociology 
with  the  creation  of  a  School  of  Public  Welfare  in  the  University  of 
North  Carolina,  as  announced  in  this  issue,  mark  a  new  period  in  the 
history  of  sociology  and  social  work  in  the  United  States.  The  organiza- 
tion of  two  strong  departments  of  sociology  in  the  South  represents 
also  the  culmination  of  an  increasing  interest  in  the  South  in  the  inves- 
tigation and  solution  of  social  problems.  The  work  of  individual 
Southern  sociologists,  the  Southern  Sociological  Congress,  the  effective 
educational  and  social  service  activities  of  the  American  Red  Cross  in 
southern  states,  the  recent  meeting  of  the  National  Conference  of  Social 
Work  in  New  Orleans,  are  undoubtedly  among  the  factors  which  have 
contributed  to  the  establishment  of  these  two  fully  organized  depart- 
ments of  sociology  and  schools  of  social  work.  It  is  significant  that 
each  institution  has  established  a  chair  of  social  technology.  This 
emphasis  upon  applied  sociology  should  insure  the  development  of 
training  for  social  service  adapted  to  the  needs  of  southern  communities. 
At  the  same  time,  social  theory  and  social  research  are  also  stressed. 
In  the  study  and  interpretation  of  American  society,  sociologists  will 
welcome  the  increased  co-operation  and  contribution  now  to  be  expected 
from  southern  universities. 

Baylor  University 

The  Baylor  University  Press  announces  the  publication  in  August  of 
a  textbook  entitled  "Introduction  to  the  Principles  of  Sociology,"  by 
Professor  G.  S.  Dow,  head  of  the  department  of  sociology. 


230  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

BowDOiN  College 

Mr.  Glenn  R.  Johnson  has  been  appointed  instructor  in  sociology 
and  economics. 

Butler  College 

Dr.  Howard  E.  Jensen  has  been  appointed  professor  of  sociology  to 
succeed  Dr.  Lumley  who  has  resigned. 


University  of  Chicago 

Official  announcement  is  made  by  the  Board  of  Trustees  of  the 
University  of  Chicago  of  the  adoption  of  a  plan  proposed  by  the  Trustees 
of  the  Chicago  School  of  Civics  and  Philanthropy  whereby  the  University 
shall  take  over  the  functions  of  the  School  and  establish  a  graduate 
professional  curriculum  for  students  in  civics  and  philanthropy,  to  be 
known  as  the  School  of  Social  Service  Administration. 

The  Chicago  School  of  Civics  and  Philanthropy  was  founded  eighteen 
years  ago  by  Professor  Graham  Taylor,  and  among  those  who  assisted  in 
its  early  work  was  the  late  Professor  Charles  R.  Henderson,  of  the  Uni- 
versity of  Chicago.  Among  its  later  faculty  have  been  Dr.  Sophonisba 
P.  Breckinridge,  Assistant  Professor  of  Social  Economy,  and  Dr.  Edith 
Abbott,  Lecturer  in  Sociology,  at  the  University  of  Chicago,  who  have 
had  charge  of  the  special  work  in  social  investigation.  Nearly  3,000 
men  and  women  have  been  trained  in  the  school,  and  it  has  furnished 
many  investigators  for  expert  service. 

The  Dean  of  the  new  school  will  be  Dean  Leon  C.  Marshall,  of  the 
School  of  Commerce  and  Administration  of  the  University  of  Chicago. 

Professor  Scott  E.  W.  Bedford  has  been  in  residence  the  Summer 
Quarter,  giving  his  usual  courses.  The  three  quarters  preceding  he  has 
been  out  of  residence,  with  the  War  Department  in  the  capacity  of 
Development  Expert  in  General  Education.  This  work  is  in  connection 
with  the  new  educational  policy  of  the  army.  He  has  helped  to  prepare 
the  manual  for  the  basic  course  in  citizenship  which  is  really  all  the 
social  sciences  in  one  course.  He  was  also  sent  to  study  and  consult  the 
leading  agencies  doing  any  kind  of  work  in  Americanization  and  citizen- 
ship training.  He  has  visited  several  camps  and  posts  to  aid  in  the 
general  educational  work  and  has  addressed  the  recruiting  personnel, 
commercial  bodies,  and  civic  organizations  in  the  large  cities. 

Beginning  September  i  the  University  has  granted  Professor  Bedford 
a  year's  leave  of  absence  in  order  that  he  might  continue  this  work. 


NEWS  AND  NOTES  231 

He  will  be  in  the  eastern  department  of  the  army  with  headquarters  at 
Governor's  Island.  His  duties  will  be  to  supervise  the  work  in  general 
education  in  the  eastern  department,  including  Porto  Rico. 

At  an  unusually  well-attended  meeting  of  the  Sociology  Club 
addresses  were  made  by  Professor  Charles  A.  Ellwood,  of  the  University 
of  Missouri,  on  "The  Need  for  Scholarship  in  the  Social  Sciences,"  and 
by  Professor  Scott  E.  W.  Bedford  on  "The  Social  Significance  of  the 
New  Educational  Activities  of  the  Army." 


University  of  Illinois 

Dr.  E.  C.  Hayes  has  gone  for  the  summer  to  Colorado  where  he  will 
lecture  for  a  few  weeks  in  the  State  Normal  School  at  Gunnison.  He  will 
then  go  to  Greeley  where  he  will  lecture  for  the  summer-quarter  session 
in  the  Colorado  State  Teachers'  College. 

Mr.  S.  C.  Ratclifife  has  been  appointed  as  an  instructor  in  sociology 
here  to  take  the  place  of  Mr.  E.  F.  Reed,  who  is  going  to  devote  his  full 
time  this  coming  year  to  study. 


Lawrence  College 
Mr.  F.  A.  Conrad,  who  for  part  of  last  year  lectured  in  sociology  at 
the  University  of  Cincinnati,  has  been  added  to  the  stafiF  here  and  will 
have  full  charge  of  the  work  in  sociology. 


Leland  Stanford  Junior  University 

Professor  Walter  G.  Beach,  formerly  dean  at  the  State  School  of 
Agriculture,  Pullman,  Washington,  has  been  appointed  professor  of 
social  science. 

University  of  Minnesota 

Professor  Manuel  C.  Elmer,  of  the  department  of  sociology,  has  been 
engaged  by  the  Central  Council  of  Social  Agencies  of  Minneapolis  to 
conduct  a  survey  of  a  district  in  south  Minneapolis  to  determine  the 
question  of  the  advisability  of  locating  a  neighborhood  house  in  this 
section  of  the  city.  Professor  Elmer  and  his  advanced  students  have 
just  completed  a  community  survey  of  Stillwater,  Minnesota,  the 
results  of  which  are  being  published. 

Professor  L.  L.  Bernard  was  advanced  from  the  rank  of  associate 
professor  to  that  of  professor  of  sociology,  efifective  July  i,  1920.  Pro- 
fessor Bernard  has  also  been  awarded  an  Amherst  Memorial  Fellowship 


232  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

for  one  year,  amounting  to  $2,000  without  service  obligation,  to  enable 
him  to  complete  an  investigation  of  the  interrelations  of  personalities 
and  institutions.  His  problem  centers  around  the  competing  claims 
of  instincts  and  acquired  habits  as  factors  in  the  development  of  per- 
sonality and  of  institutional  organization,  together  with  a  studv  of  the 
method  by  which  environmental  pressures  direct  habit  formation. 

Mr.  Charles  E.  Lively,  instructor  in  the  department  of  sociology, 
will  spend  the  summer  in  a  community  study  of  the  relationship  between 
types  of  agriculture  and  the  social  life  of  the  community.  This  study 
is  expected  to  extend  over  two  summers  and  is  being  made  under  the 
joint  supervision  of  Professor  Galpin  of  the  United  States  Department 
of  Agriculture  and  Professor  Bernard  of  the  department  of  sociology. 


University  of  Missouri 

Professor  Carl  C.  Taylor  has  resigned  as  associate  professor  of 
sociology  at  this  university  to  become  head  of  the  department  of  agri- 
cultural economics  in  the  North  CaroUna  College  of  Agricultural  and 
Mechanical  Arts  at  Raleigh,  N.  C. 

Professor  EUwood's  book,  The  Social  Problem,  will  be  translated  into 
Chinese  by  Professor  Kenneth  Duncan,  professor  of  economics  in 
Canton  Christian  College,  Canton. 


University  of  North  Carolina 

Readers  of  the  Journal  will  recall  the  spring  announcement  from  the 
university  of  the  enlargement  of  the  department  of  rural  social  science 
under  the  direction  of  Dr.  E.  C.  Branson,  to  include  Assistant  Professor 
Hobbes,  with  Miss  Noa  and  Miss  Smeades  assisting  in  the  work  of  the 
rural  social  science  laboratory.  The  pubUcations  of  this  department 
have  made  a  very  definite  contribution  to  the  literature  of  the  subject, 
and  the  efforts  of  Dr.  Branson  have  contributed  largely  to  the  develop- 
ment of  the  new  School  of  PubHc  Welfare. 

Then  came  the  announcement  that  the  Board  of  Trustees  had 
authorized  the  establishment  of  a  School  of  Public  Welfare.  Dr. 
Howard  W.  Odum  was  elected  director  of  this  school  and  Kenan 
Professor  of  Sociology,  and  with  Dr.  Branson,  and  other  colleagues,  began 
to  work  out  plans  for  a  very  definite  and  enlarged  program  of  university 
work  and  state  service.     This  program  will  include  a  fourfold  plan  of 


NEWS  AND  NOTES  233 

emphasizing  the  teaching  of  sociology  and  the  social  sciences  in  the 
regular  university  curriculum;  a  training  school  for  social  work;  efforts 
toward  adequate  service  to  communities  through  social  engineering; 
and  university  and  social  research  and  publication. 

In  the  pursuance  of  the  second  purpose,  namely,  the  training  of 
social  workers,  the  university  will  place  the  emphasis  upon  rural,  town, 
and  village  workers.  The  American  Red  Cross  has  co-operated  and  will 
continue  for  a  time  a  program  of  co-operation.  In  the  selection  of 
instructors  the  university  has  again  been  fortunate  in  obtaining  Professor 
A.  H.  Burnett  for  community  organization  and  Mary  A.  Burnett  as 
supervisor  of  field  work  and  lecturer  on  family  case  work. 

Another  announcement  of  importance  from  the  University  of  North 
Carolina  is  the  selection  of  Dr.  J.  F.  Steiner  as  professor  of  social  tech- 
nology in  their  new  School  of  Public  Welfare.  Dr.  Steiner  will  begin 
his  work  in  the  winter  quarter  of  the  university,  and  becomes  one  of  the 
outstanding  additions  to  that  university's  original  program  of  public 
welfare  and  social  research.  To  his  adequate  university  training  and 
experience.  Dr.  Steiner  brings  an  unusually  valuable  experience  in  the 
practical  fields  of  social  work,  education  for  professional  social  work, 
and  administrative  work  as  National  Educational  Director  of  the 
American  Red  Cross. 

The  first  special  efifort  of  the  School  of  Public  Welfare  resulted  in  the 
summer  institutes  for  pubHc  welfare  in  which  more  than  fifty  full-time 
students  enrolled.  Among  these  were  some  twenty-five  county  super- 
intendents of  public  welfare  in  North  Carolina,  twenty  of  whom  remained 
through  the  entire  Institute  prepared  for  them.  An  outstanding  feature 
of  the  institutes  was  the  participation  by  the  state  commissioner  of 
public  welfare  and  his  staff,  thus  co-ordinating  university  and  state 
department  closely. 

In  its  unusual  and  large  program  President  Chase  has  followed  up 
his  initiative  in  getting  the  school  estabhshed  with  continuous  support 
and  foresight;  State  Commissioner  Beasley  of  Raleigh  has  shown  a 
remarkable  and  well-guided  enthusiasm,  remaining  the  entire  time  of  the 
institutes  with  his  force  and  helping  direct  its  work;  the  aUied  depart- 
ments of  community  music,  folk-drama,  economics,  commerce,  govern- 
ment, and  others  offer  strong  courses;  and  the  state  at  large  seems 
willing  to  enter  into  an  expanding  program  of  public  welfare,  making 
possible  for  the  university  a  place  of  its  own  in  the  teaching  of  the  social 
sciences  and  the  promotion  of  public  welfare  work. 


234  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

Oberlin  College 
Professor  Herbert  A.  Miller  sailed  for  Europe  in  January  to  study 
conditions  in  the  new  Mid-European  republics.  In  Czecho-Slovakia  he 
was  the  guest  of  President  Masaryk,  with  whom  he  was  associated  in 
the  work  of  the  Mid-European  Union.  In  Vienna,  Professor  Miller 
had  a  conference  with  Professor  Sigmund  Freud,  who  expressed  interest 
in  the  application  of  his  principles  of  psychoanalysis  in  sociological 
thinking  in  the  United  States.  After  a  tour  of  Hungary,  Roumania, 
and  Serbia,  Professor  Miller  will  return  to  this  country  to  resume  his 
college  work. 

Ohio  State  University 
Dr.  F.  E.  Lumley,  of  Butler  College,  has  accepted  the  position  of 
assistant  professor  of  sociology.     Mr.  W.  E.  Gettys  has  resigned  to  go 
to  Tulane  University. 

Spokane  University 
Mr.  James  G.  Patrick  has  been  appointed  to  take  charge  of  the 
department  of  social  science  which  will  be  reorganized  and  include 
courses  in  sociology,  political  science,  and  economics. 


Washington  University 
Dr.  Walter  B.  Bodenhafer,  assistant  professor  of  sociology  in  the 
University  of  Kansas,  has  been  appointed  associate  professor  in  this 
institution  and  will  have  charge  of  the  work  in  sociology. 


Tulane  University 

Announcement  is  made  of  the  organization  of  a  department  of 
sociology  and  school  of  social  science.  Dr.  E.  B.  Renter,  formerly  of 
Goucher  College,  has  accepted  the  chair  of  sociology  and  has  been 
appointed  director  of  the  school  of  social  science.  Professor  R.  J. 
Colbert,  director  of  Educational  Service  of  the  Gulf  Division  of  the 
American  Red  Cross,  was  elected  to  the  chair  of  social  technology. 
Mr.  Warren  E.  Gettys,  of  Ohio  State  University,  was  appointed  instruc- 
tor in  social  technology.  Dr.  A.  W.  Hayes,  who  completed  the  work 
for  his  doctor's  degree  at  the  University  of  Wisconsin,  has  been  selected 
instructor  in  rural  sociology  and  rural  organization. 

One  of  the  interesting  features  of  this  staff  and  the  development  of 
the  work  here  is  the  understanding  with  which  these  men  have  been 
selected.     Each  will  give  half-time  to  the  teaching,  and  the  remainder 


NEWS  AND  NOTES  235 

of  his  time  will  be  devoted  to  the  building  up  of  teaching  material  and 
research  work.  Through  experience  it  was  found  necessary  to  make 
provision  for  the  collecting  and  organizing  of  teaching  material  related 
directly  to  the  situation  and  the  condition  of  the  South.  The  findings 
of  this  research  work  will  be  made  available  to  sociologists  throughout 
the  country  who  have  had  little  opportunity  in  the  past  to  obtain 
sociological  data  and  teaching  material  upon  the  southern  situation. 

The  development  of  this  department  of  sociology,  together  with 
the  creation  of  a  chair  in  economics,  marks  the  development  of  a  new 
epoch  in  the  southern  universities.  Social  science  has  been  practically 
undeveloped  in  southern  schools,  and  as  a  result  the  southern  oppor- 
tunities which  require  sociological  and  economic  training  are  usually 
awarded  to  students  who  come  from  the  North  and  East.  The  develop- 
ment of  this  work  will  open  a  larger  opportunity  to  southern  young 
men  and  women,  and  at  the  same  time  will  stimulate  interest  in  the 
South  in  sociological  and  economic  problems. 


University  of  Wisconsin 
Professor  E.  A.  Ross  has  been  granted  leave  of  absence  for  the 
first  semester  of  1920-21.     Associate  Professor  William  H.  Kiekhofer 
has  been  promoted  to  a  full  professorship. 


University  of  Washington 
Professor  R.  D.  McKenzie,  of  the  University  of  West  Virginia,  has 
accepted  the  position  of  associate  professor  of  sociology  in  the  department 
here.     Professor  McKenzie  will  develop  the  work  in  the  appUed  field. 
During  the  summer  he  gave  courses  in  community  organization. 


University  of  West  Virginia 
Mr.  George  E.  Hartman,  of  the  University  of  Chicago,  has  been 
appointed  assistant  professor  of  sociology  to  fill  the  vacancy  created 
by  the  resignation  of  Professor  Roderick  D.  McKenzie,  who  goes  to  the 
University  of  Washington.    

Doctoral  Dissertation 
Elizabeth  Pinney  Hunt,  A.B.,  A.M.,  Bryn  Mawr,  has  selected  the 
subject,  "Prenatal  and  Maternity  Care  in  Relation  to  the  State,"  for 
her  doctor's  thesis  in  sociology.  In  pursuit  of  this  investigation,  Mrs. 
Hunt  will  study  the  situation  in  Europe  in  1920-21,  and  during  the  year 
will  be  in  residence  at  the  University  of  Stockholm. 


REVIEWS 


The  Source  and  Aim  of  Human  Progress.  By  Boris  Sidis.  Boston: 
Richard  G.  Badger,  1919.     Pp.  63.     $1.50. 

The  main  thesis  of  Professor  Sidis'  work  is,  in  his  own  words,  that 
"the  source  and  aim  of  true  human  progress  are  the  cultivation  and 
development  of  man's  self-ruling,  rational,  free  individuality."  The 
corollary  to  this  thesis  is  stated  in  his  answer  on  how  to  overcome  all  of 
the  great  obstacles  to  human  progress,  "human  sufferings,  virulent 
mental  epidemics,  and  other  severe  social  maladies."  His  reply  is 
that  there  is  only  one  possible  scientific  answer  based  upon  biology, 
sociology,  and  social  psychology,  namely:  "Fortify  the  resistance  of 
the  individual  by  freedom  of  individuality  and  by  the  full  development 
of  personality.  Immunize  the  individual  against  social,  mental  plagues 
by  the  full  development  of  his  rational  reflective  self,  controlling  the 
suggestible,  automatic  subconscious  with  its  reflex  consciousness.  Put 
no  barriers  to  man's  self-expression,  lay  no  chains  on  man,  put  no 
taboos  on  the  human  spirit." 

The  whole  spirit  of  this  interesting  work  fraternizes  strikingly  with 
the  spirit  of  such  a  book  as  Brooks  Adams '  Theory  of  Social  Revolutions. 
In  one  sense  it  is  distinctly  pessimistic — in  its  emphasis  upon  mob  sug- 
gestibility, the  prevalence  of  fear  taboos,  the  hysteria  of  war,  the  reversion 
of  society  to  primitive  types,  the  crushing  influence  of  institutionalizing, 
fear  of  over-legislation  and  government.  While  Professor  Sidis  ascribes 
the  impetus  to  this  book  to  his  master,  William  James,  he  might  well 
have  added  also  a  more  or  less  unconscious  inspiration  and  impetus  from 
Herbert  Spencer,  for  although  Spencer's  name  is  kept  in  the  background 
his  spirit  is  certainly  present  throughout  the  book. 

While  the  author's  emphasis  is  constantly  upon  the  function  of  the 
individual  in  his  contrasting  of  mass  and  class,  and  in  his  depreciation 
of  mere  bigness  and  boosting,  yet  it  is  not  an  apology  of  the  crasser  sort 
for  the  superman,  a  la  Nietzsche.  It  is  primarily  a  demand  for  members 
of  a  social  order  who  have  learned  to  inhibit  their  lower  emotional  and 
suggestible  selves  in  order  to  give  freer  play  to  the  selective,  critical 
"voice  and  will"  centers,  an  individualism  that  is  not  stifled  by  social 
suppression,  an  individualism  that  can  hold  fast  its  faith  against  the 

236 


REVIEWS  237 

"hysterical  convulsions  of  mob-frenzies"  or  the  "maniacal,  nationalistic 
excitement  with  fixed  paranoidal  delusions  of  national  grandeur,  demo- 
niacal obsessions  of  world-dominion,  resulting  in  homicidal  and  suicidal 
world-wars." 

The  second  part  of  the  book  and  the  part  which  probably  meets  more 
nearly  the  crying  need  of  these  postbellum  times  includes  the  sections 
given  over  to  upholding  the  value  of  freedom  of  opinion.  The  true 
value  of  an  opinion,  the  author  says,  is  not  so  much  in  its  truth  as  in  its 
freedom.  The  reviewer  takes  the  same  attitude.  While  he  does  not 
agree  with  either  all  the  applications  of  biology  and  psychology,  nor 
with  all  of  the  obiter  dicta  which  are  voiced  in  this  book,  he  has  felt  a 
distinct  stimulus  of  thought  from  it,  and  appreciates  the  freshness  with 
which  the  author's  opinions  and  scientific  convictions  are  stated. 

Arthur  J.  Todd 
Chicago  

The  Philosophy  of  Conflict  and  Other  Essays  in  War  Time.  By 
Havelock  Ellis.  Boston:  The  Houghton  Mifflin  Co.,  1919. 
Pp.  vi4-299.  $2.50. 
This  collection  of  essays  offers  still  further  proof  of  the  author's 
versatility.  They  cover  a  wide  range  of  subjects,  but  while  they  differ 
on  the  score  of  profundity  and  length,  all  are  marked  by  the  same 
brilliancy  of  style  and  encyclopedic  knowledge  to  which  we  have  grown 
accustomed  in  this  stimulating  EngUshman.  Some  of  the  essays  cover 
a  field  of  belles  lettres  somewhat  remote  from  the  social  technician's 
everyday  world,  but  the  larger  number  of  them  are  well  within  the  scope 
of  either  theoretical  or  applied  sociology.  The  title  essay  is  by  no 
means  the  best  in  the  series,  nor  to  the  reviewer  does  it  appear  that  the 
half-dozen  essays  treating  more  or  less  of  the  subject  of  war  and  civiliza- 
tion seem  to  measure  up  with  those  relating  to  the  biological  aspects  of 
society  with  which  we  have  associated  the  author's  name  for  so  long. 
Thus  the  essays  on  "Eugenics  in  Relation  to  the  War,"  "Birth  Control 
and  Eugenics,"  "The  Mind  of  Woman,"  "Equal  Pay  for  Equal  Work," 
"  Psycho- Analysis  in  Relation  to  Sex,"  attain  the  highest  mark  in  the 
whole  volume,  for  they  really  add  both  new  material  and  fresh,  stimu- 
lating points  of  view  to  previous  discussions  of  these  subjects.  For 
sheer  pleasure,  however,  should  be  recommended  the  essay  on  the  great 
South  American  man  of  letters,  Rodo,  for  both  this  Latin  genius  and  his 
English  reviewer  challenge  to  a  certain  extent  the  complacency  of  our 
North  American  utilitarian  Ufe.     This   might  be  summarized  in  the 


238  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

quotation  of  a  single  sentence.  "  If  it  can  be  said  that  Utilitarianism  is 
the  Word  of  the  English  spirit,  then  the  United  States  is  the  Word  made 
flesh."  From  the  point  of  view  of  the  restlessness  of  a  world  in 
throes  of  reconstruction,  there  is  a  challenge  to  ponder  Ellis'  dictum 
(p.  33)  that  "  the  great  wars  of  history  are  ambiguous  for  the  most  part, 
but  when  any  meaning  emerges,  the  moral  is  clear  to  see:  Woe  to  the 
victors!"  This  book  is  attractively  printed  with  only  here  and  there  a 
slip  in  proofreading  and  should  prove  valuable  not  only  for  general 
public  consumption  but  also  as  collateral  reading  in  courses  on  social 
conflict  or  the  family. 

Arthur  J.  Todd 
Chicago  

Thoughts  of  a  Psychiatrist  on  the  War  and  After.  By  William 
A.  White,  M.D.  New  York:  Paul  B.  Hoeber,  1919.  Pp. 
X  +  137.     $1.75. 

The  nature  of  this  collection  of  popular  essays  on  war  and  its  social 
aftermath  is  well  indicated  by  its  title.  Culture-immaturity,  the 
struggle  between  the  individual  and  the  group,  war  and  the  social  conse- 
quences of  war  are  given  a  psychoanalytic  interpretation.  War  is  both 
good  and  bad.  It  releases  primitive  animal  impulses.  It  serves  also 
as  "the  preliminary  process  of  rejuvenescence."  With  it  comes  social 
rebirth  and  introduction  to  a  new  line  of  progress.  War  always  will 
be  with  us  unless  in  some  way  we  discover  a  rational  method  of  sublimat- 
ing the  hate  instinct  as  it  arises  between  nations. 

The  brevity  of  the  book  will  make  it  difficult  for  readers  unacquainted 
with  psychoanalytic  literature.  If  it  leads  some  of  these  into  the  more 
extended  discussions  of  the  psychology  of  war  it  will  accomplish  what 
doubtless  was  the  purpose  of  the  author. 

Ernest  R.  Groves 

New  Hampshire  College 


The  Economic  Consequences  of  the  Peace.     By  John  Maynard 

Keynes.     New   York:    Harcourt,   Brace   and   Howe,    1920. 

Pp.  298.     $2.50. 

The  prime  importance  of  this  book  (now  in  its  thirtieth  thousand 

and  under  wide  discussion)  consists  not  merely  in  the  authoritative 

positions  held  by  the  writer.     As  fellow  of  King's  College,  Cambridge, 

editor  of  the  Economic  Journal,  director  during  the  war  of  financial 

relations  with  the  AUies,  and  later  member  of  the  Supreme  Economic 


REVIEWS  239 

Council,  he  has  been  in  a  position  to  write  with  rare  insight  of  the  eco- 
nomic conditions  of  Europe  and  consequences  of  the  Peace  Treaty.  Nor 
does  the  importance  of  the  book  arise  from  its  unusually  keen  and  open- 
minded  analysis  of  present  conditions  in  Europe.  The  prime  importance 
of  the  work  consists  in  its  vivid  sense  of  the  growing  moral  and  economic 
solidarity  of  the  world,  and  particularly  of  Europe  and  its  detailed 
search  for  a  sound  economic  basis  on  which  a  peace  settlement  can 
really  be  made,  in  view  of  that  solidarity. 

Through  the  seven  chapters — Introductory,  "Europe  before  the 
War,"  "The  Conference,"  "The  Treaty,"  "Reparation,"  "Europe  after 
the  Treaty,"  and  "Remedies,"  Mr.  Keynes  relentlessly  and  fairly  pur- 
sues the  questions :  What  has  really  been  done  to  right  the  war  wrongs  ? 
What  are  the  defects  of  these  efforts  ?  and  What  must  be  done  to  settle 
the  issues  fairly  and  really  ? 

His  delineations  of  the  characters  and  circumstances  of  the  chief 
actors  at  the  Peace  Council  are  picturesque,  brilliant,  and  probably 
about  as  accurate  as  the  conclusions  of  any  close  observer  can  be  expected 
to  be  at  the  present  time.  He  holds  that  Clemenceau  insisted  on  a 
Carthaginian  peace  against  Germany,  as  in  a  perpetual  prize  fight  of 
European  history,  and  states  that  his  own  "purpose  in  the  book  is  to 
show  that  the  Carthaginian  peace  is  not  practically  right  or  possible." 
He  holds  that  in  this  policy  Clemenceau,  backed  by  the  reactionary 
forces  of  the  hour,  won  nearly  all  of  his  main  points,  which  will  have  to 
be  undone  or  revised.  Lloyd  George,  he  holds,  was  forced  by  an  unfor- 
tunate poUtical  situation  in  England,  and  against  his  better  natural 
inclinations,  into  a  somewhat  similar  position  of  untenable  extreme 
measures.  And  Wilson,  he  claims,  was  in  Paris  to  do  nothing  that 
was  not  just  and  right,  as  indicated  by  the  "fourteen  points,"  but  was 
without  a  sufl&ciently  detailed  constructive  poUcy  or  sufficiently  experi- 
enced advisers  (barring  a  few  exceptions). 

The  interesting  remedies  for  the  present  serious  European  situation, 
which  Mr.  Keynes  convincingly  sets  forth,  are  in  brief  as  follows:  (i)  A 
revision  of  the  treaty  should  be  made  to  provide  a  possible  indemnity 
for  Germany,  and  to  include  the  Reparation  Commission  in  the  League 
of  Nations.  By  the  present  terms,  Mr.  Keynes  holds  that  the  Germans 
would  be  required  to  pay  the  impossible  sum  of  $40,000,000,000,  which 
should  be  reduced  to  $10,000,000,000,  in  the  interest  of  the  actual 
resuscitation  of  Europe.  On  the  shoulders  of  those  who  approve  this, 
he  says,  the  burden  of  detailed  proof  rests.  (2)  A  free  trade  union 
should  be  established  for  Europe  under  the  auspices  of  the  League  of 


240  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

Nations.  (3)  All  inter-ally  indebtedness  should  be  immediately  can- 
celed. (4)  The  pressing  needs  of  Europe  for  food  and  business  revival 
should  be  met  at  once  by  an  international  loan  under  adequate  security 
by  some  method  of  organization  that  will  prevent  graft  in  any  sense. 
(5)  Russia  must  be  given  a  chance  to  get  on  her  feet  again  as  well  as 
Germany,  if  for  no  other  reason  than  to  prevent  the  wider  spread  of 
chaos  through  a  union  of  radically  revolutionary  forces  in  Central 

E"^«P"-  C.    J.    BUSHNELL 

Toledo  Unr^ersity 

A  National  System  of  Education.  By  Walter  Scott  Athearn. 
New  York:   George  H.  Doran  Co.,  1920.     Pp.132.     $1.50. 

This  book  should  be  read  by  everyone  interested  in  the  complete 
education  of  American  youth.  The  author  beUeves  that  America  must 
have  an  American  education  which  is  thoroughly  spiritual  as  well  as 
technical.  Because  of  the  division  of  state  and  church,  there  is  the 
necessity  of  both  a  pubUc-school  system  and  a  reUgious-education 
system.  The  scheme  for  both  the  pubUc  education  and  the  reUgious 
education  is  thoroughly  worked  out  in  this  book.  With  wonderful 
clearness  the  author  points  out  how  the  pubUc  schools  first  grew  up 
spontaneously  to  meet  parish  needs;  second,  how  they  were  copied  after 
the  German  scheme,  a  scheme  which  was  devised  to  dethrone  democracy 
and  enthrone  subservience  to  autocracy;  and  third,  how  the  pubHc 
schools  are  gradually  throwing  off  these  shackles  and  developing  an 
American  system  with  democratic  attitudes  and  ideals  as  the  goal  of 
education. 

The  author  also  graphically  portrays  the  development  of  church 
education  from  the  beginning  of  United  States  history,  shows  how  it  has 
been  organized  and  promoted,  and  gives  the  scheme  which  he  thinks  will 
adequately  serve  the  nation  in  this  hour  of  great  need. 

The  virile  approach  of  this  book  is  much  enhanced  by  the  graphic 
charts  which  picture  the  actual  development  of  both  the  pubUc-school 
system  and  the  church-school  systems.  T    A     4  m 

University  of  Chicago        

Educational  Sociology.    By   William   Estabrook   Chancellor. 
New  York:  The  Century  Co.,  1919.     Pp.  xii+422.     $2.25. 
Chancellor  has  been  known  in  the  field  of  education  for  nearly  a 
score  of  years  as  a  very  clever  writer.     Here  in  the  field  of  sociology  he 
is  in  his  usual  style:  always  original  and  often  brilliant. 


REVIEWS  241 

His  system  of  social  theory  has  little  in  common  with  any  other  that 
has  ever  been  put  into  print.  Part  I,  "Social  Movements,"  comprises 
seventeen  chapters,  some  with  familiar  titles  such  as  "Public  Opinion" 
and  "Social  Solidarity,"  but  others  with  such  novel  headings  as  "Public 
Opinion  in  City  and  Country,"  "The  Rules  of  the  Game,"  "Social 
Gatherings,"  and  "The  Rise  ond  Fall  of  the  Individual  Great  Man." 
Part  II,  "Social  Institutions,"  selects  these  twelve  for  a  chapter  each: 
state,  property,  family,  church,  school,  occupation,  charity,  amusement, 
art,  science,  business,  and  war.  Part  III,  "Social  Measurement," 
has  a  chapter  on  "The  Social  Survey  of  a  Community,"  but  the  other 
six  chapters  are  rather  a  comparative  study  of  institutions. 

The  title  is  misleading.  Only  two  of  the  thirty-seven  chapters  treat 
of  education,  while  the  others  rarely  mention  it  or  have  any  obvious 
connection  with  it.  But  every  page  bristles  with  epigrams  or  striking 
facts,  so  that  one  may  dip  into  the  book  an3rwhere  and  become  interested. 

F.  R.  Clow 
State  Normal  School 

OsHKosH,  Wis. 

Seventeenth-Century  Life  in  the  Country  Parish,  with  Special  Refer- 
ence to  Local  Government.  By  Eleanor  Trotter.  Cam- 
bridge: Cambridge  University  Press,  191 9.     Pp.242.     10s. 

Students  of  England  in  the  seventeenth  century  are  accustomed  to 
devote  their  attention  largely  to  revolutionary  movements  and  consti- 
tutional changes.  Ultimately  these  have  had  a  profound  effect  upon  the 
whole  Anglo-Saxon  race.  But,  according  to  Miss  Trotter,  "the  machin- 
ery for  administration  of  the  laws  and  the  maintenance  of  peace  was  so 
decentralized  that  the  life  of  the  average  man  flowed  on  undisturbed." 

The  author  does  not  give  us  an  intimate  picture  of  this  "life  of  the 
average  man,"  but  she  does  outline  in  an  interesting  fashion  the  more 
formal  aspects  of  parish  life.  Churchwardens,  Anglican  priest,  over- 
seers of  the  poor,  petty  constable,  surveyor  and  justice  of  the  peace  are 
treated  at  some  length,  as  are  laborers  and  apprentices,  rogues  and 
vagabonds.  A  single  chapter  is  devoted  to  the  "social  life  of  the  village 
community." 

One  gathers  from  the  whole  discussion  the  hopeful  view  that,  having 
weathered  the  seventeenth-century  storm,  the  Enghsh-speaking  world 
at  least  may  survive  the  terrors  of  the  twentieth  century. 

Stuart  A.  Queen 
Simmons  College 


242  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

Labor  in  the  Changing  World.  By  R.  M.  MacIver.  New  York: 
E.  P.  Dutton  &  Co.,  1919.  Pp.  230.  $2.00. 
This  is  an  indictment  of  the  present  industrial  system  on  the  follow- 
ing charges:  first,  waste  in  the  form  of  unemployment,  labor  turnover, 
antagonism,  and  strikes;  second,  the  fact  that  labor  is  treated  as  a  com- 
modity rather  than  as  a  personality;  third,  the  loss  of  interest  of  wage- 
earners  in  any  part  of  the  process  of  production  since  the  introduction 
of  machinery  has  taken  away  the  craft  requirements  and  skill.  On  the 
basis  of  this  indictment,  a  plea  is  made  for  an  industrial  democracy 
that  will  make  production  the  common  interest  of  wage-earners  and 
capitalists,  that  will  mean  a  business  management  in  which  labor  partici- 
pates, that  will  make  labor  feel  like  a  partner  rather  than  a  hireling, 
that  will  treat  labor  as  personality  and  consequently  make  the  welfare 
of  those  who  produce  the  first  interest.  Such  an  industrial  democracy 
would  be  in  the  form  of  industrial  unionism,  shop  stewards,  labor  legis- 
lation, and  a  labor  party.  Apparently  the  purpose  of  the  program  is  to 
bring  labor  and  capital  together  so  that  they  can  understand  each  other 
rather  than  to  offer  a  ready-made  solution  of  the  conflict  between  wages 
and  profits.  The  book  is  a  very  satisfactory  popular  presentation  of  a 
thesis  which  is  not  new  but  deserves  a  great  deal  of  attention. 

E.    H.    SUTHERL.VND 
University  of  Illinois 


The  Problems  of  Labor.  By  Daniel  Bloomfield.  New  York: 
The  H.  W.  Wilson  Co.,  1920.  Pp.  xxi+436.  $1 .80. 
The  nature  of  this  work  is  clearly  stated  in  the  introductory  note: 
"The  aim  of  this  volume  is  to  present  a  useful  and  well-organized  body 
of  material  dealing  with  the  principal  topics  in  what  we  have  commonly 
learned  to  style  the  labor  problem."  The  material  is  selected  from 
current  publications  of  a  popular  or  semipopular  nature.  By  virtue 
of  a  wide  selection  of  readings,  varied  and  even  extreme  points  of  view 
are  presented.  This  is  one  of  the  commendable  points  in  the  volume 
inasmuch  as  these  points  of  view,  whether  correct  or  false,  are  conditions 
with  which  the  student  of  labor  must  reckon.  The  selection  and  organi- 
zation of  these  articles  is  made  from  the  point  of  view  of  the  personnel 
administrator.  It  is  the  purpose  of  the  volume  to  provide  a  basis  of 
information  for  the  practical  administrator  of  personnel  relations.  The 
selections  are  grouped  about  the  following  general  topics:  causes  of 
friction  and  unrest,  cost  of  living,  methods  of  compensation,  tenure  of 


REVIEWS  243 

employment,  trade  unionism,  labor  disputes  and  adjustment,  limitation 
of  output,  industrial  insurance,  housing,  methods  of  promoting  industrial 
peace,  occupational  hygiene,  women  in  industry. 

This  should  prove  a  convenient  handbook  to  all  persons  interested 
in  matters  of  personnel  administration. 

R.  W.  Stone 

GoucHER  College 


r 


The  Turnover  of  Factory  Labor.  By  Sumner  H.  Slighter.  With 
an  Introduction  by  John  R.  Commons.  New  York:  D.  Apple- 
ton  &  Co.,  1919.     Pp.  xiv+460.     $3.00. 

The  study  of  labor  turnover  is  probably  the  most  important  develop- 
ment that  has  been  made  during  the  present  generation  in  the  field  of 
labor  problems.  Dr.  Slichter  has  produced  the  first  comprehensive 
book  on  this  subject.  He  has  rendered  a  distinct  service  by  collecting  the 
scattered  materials,  adding  to  them  the  results  of  his  own  extensive 
investigations,  and  making  an  unusually  keen  analysis  of  the  whole  thing. 

The  study  is  made  from  the  point  of  view  of  scientific  management 
and  is  distinctly  limited  to  that.  The  author  explicitly  avoids  the 
question  of  unemployment  in  its  relation  to  labor  turnover,  as  well  as 
the  broad  social  policies,  such  as  home  ownership,  which  might  have 
a  relation  to  labor  turnover.  He  limits  his  study  to  the  factory.  His 
question  is.  How  can  the  rapid  shifting  of  the  labor  force  be  reduced? 
His  answer  is,  By  scientific  management  in  handling  labor.  By  this 
answer  he  means  that  the  relations  between  employers  and  employees 
must  be  put  on  a  scientific  basis.  An  employment  department  must  be 
organized,  wages  must  be  based  on  merit,  etc.  Perhaps  the  most 
important  point  he  makes  in  this  connection  is  his  emphasis  on  the 
necessity  of  considering  the  broader  interests  of  labor.  But  no  provision 
is  made  in  this  scheme  for  collective  bargaining  or  any  representation 
of  labor  in  the  determination  of  wages  or  promotion. 

The  study  of  the  causes  of  labor  turnover  is  made  from  the  same  point 
of  view.  This  is  the  least  satisfactory  part  of  the  book.  The  informa- 
tion was  secured  by  asking  men  why  they  resigned,  or  by  taking  the 
reasons  given  by  bosses  and  superintendents  at  the  time  of  discharge. 
The  author  recognizes  that  this  is  but  an  approximation  to  the  truth. 
But  even  if  the  employees  or  the  bosses  try  to  answer  truthfully  it  is 
doubtful  if  they  could  give  the  information  that  is  needed.  There 
must  be  a  careful  "case  study"  before  the  causes  of  labor  turnover  are 
understood,  and  no  superficial  explanation  in  terms  of  more  or  less 


244  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

plausible  excuses  of  men  who  are  resigning  will  serve  as  a  basis  either 
for  the  construction  of  labor  policies  in  a  factory  or  of  the  broader  social 
policies. 

There  are  some  detailed  questions  regarding  the  definition  and 
expression  of  labor  turnover  that  may  be  raised.  It  is  questionable 
whether  labor  turnover  ought  not  be  defined  as  replacements  rather 
than  separations  if  it  is  to  be  considered  from  the  point  of  view  of  scien- 
tific management;  it  may  be  readily  admitted  that  from  the  broader 
social  point  of  view  it  ought  to  be  defined  as  separations.  It  is  question- 
able also  whether  absenteeism  ought  not  to  be  taken  into  account  in  the 
expression  of  labor  turnover,  as  Paul  H.  Douglas  has  suggested  {American 
Econo7nic  Review,  June,  1919,  p.  402).  It  is  questionable,  also,  whether 
there  ought  not  to  be  an  attempt  made  to  determine  the  conditions  in 
which  labor  turnover  may  be  considered  desirable,  in  contrast  with  the 
conditions  in  which  it  is  undesirable. 

E.  H.  Sutherland 

University  of  Illinois 


The  Joke  About  Housing.  By  Charles  Harris  Whitaker. 
Boston:     Marshall  Jones  Co.,  1920.     Pp.  vii+234.     $2.00. 

Mr.  Whi taker's  book  on  The  Joke  About  Housing  is  a  serious  work 
and  it  is  to  be  regretted  that  the  title  is  not  in  harmony  with  the  earnest, 
far-reaching  interpretation  of  the  causes  of  the  housing  problem  in 
America  and  its  effects  upon  health,  industry,  and  the  whole  mechanism 
of  community  development. 

This  book  is  symptomatic  of  a  new  tendency  in  America  toward 
a  constructive  policy  in  housing  reform.  It  indicates  a  reaUzation  of 
the  social  significance  of  housing  as  affecting  the  whole  of  the  popula- 
tion of  the  United  States,  rather  than  an  effort  to  bring  about  by  restricting 
building  regulations  the  improvement  of  the  living  conditions  of  a  minor- 
ity of  the  population  who  have  become  the  victims  of  slum  life.  The 
Joke  About  Housing  deals  mainly  with  the  relation  of  our  land  policies  of 
ownership,  land  values,  and  land  control,  and  the  effect  these  policies 
had,  not  alone  upon  the  freedom  of  land  use  in  the  development  of 
adequate  housing  provisions,  but  in  the  tribute  that  land  exacts  from 
industry  in  the  form  of  wages  and  from  labor  in  depreciation  of  wage 
values. 

The  fundamental  principles  of  land  control  advanced  by  the  author 
are  not  new  nor  startling.  The  method  of  presentation,  however,  is  not 
only  novel  and  interesting  but  brings  forth  angles  of  vision  of  the  land 


REVIEWS  245 

problem  in  relation  to  housing  that  so  far  have  not  been  touched  upon  in 
housing  literature  of  America,  although  England  has  crystallized  much 
of  this  theory  into  actual  legislation.  The  style  in  which  the  book  is 
written  should  make  this  book  one  of  the  most  popular  works  on  housing, 
as  it  is  replete  with  touches  of  keen  humor  and  sharp  sarcasm  that  help 
bring  into  striking  relief  the  main  issues  dealt  with. 

Like  all  books  devoted  to  the  presentation  and  emphasis  of  one 
fundamental  idea  the  work  suffers  from  lack  of  perspective  in  so  far  as 
its  use  as  a  work  upon  which  a  thoroughly  constructive  housing  program 
could  be  built.  While  land  is  fundamental  to  all  housing,  the  economics 
of  housing  cannot  be  limited  within  the  sphere  of  land  economics  alone. 
The  housing  problem,  however,  will  never  be  solved  without  a  full 
recognition  of  the  principles  advanced  by  Mr.  Whitaker. 

The  appendixes  contain  several  interesting  articles  on  housing 
which  serve  to  back  Mr.  Whitaker's  theories.  The  only  one  of  real 
value,  however,  is  the  essay  by  Mr.  Robert  Anderson  Pope,  which 
presents  a  valuable  analysis  of  housing  and  town  planning  in  relation  to 
the  development  of  a  new  social  order.  This  analysis  is  both  original 
and  scholarly. 

Carol  Aronovici 

San  Francisco 


An  Introduction  to  Social  Ethics;  The  Social  Conscience  in  a  Democ- 
racy. By  John  M.  Mecklin.  Harcourt,  Brace  and  Howe, 
1920.  Pp.  ix4-440.  $3.00. 
The  outstanding  excellence  of  this  book  is  that,  from  beginning  to 
end,  it  keeps  the  reader  in  contact  with  actual  processes  of  moral  valua- 
tion. Ethical  judgments  in  the  making  are  the  subject-matter  con- 
sidered from  many  angles.  It  is  impossible  either  to  prove  or  to  disprove 
that  this,  that,  or  the  other  scheme  of  moral  value  was  launched  into  this 
world  out  of  some  other  world;  and  that  it  has  authority  "independent 
of  experience,"  to  use  the  Kantian  phrase.  Modern  incredulity  about 
such  supposed  origins  of  moral  principles  has  resulted  much  less  from 
formal  argument  about  the  subject  than  from  perception,  whether  by 
the  learned  or  the  unlearned,  that  wherever  we  can  actually  trace  out 
the  antecedents  of  moral  judgments  they  have  been  fabricated  just  as 
we  have  fabricated  pottery  or  textiles  or  revenue  bills.  They  have  been 
the  best  attempts  of  the  authors  to  adapt  themselves  to  the  conditions 
of  adjustment  in  the  given  case.     After  we  have  found  this  out  in  a  few 


246  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

actual  instances  it  becomes  increasingly  difficult  to  entertain  the  hypothe- 
sis that  moral  judgments  have  ever  been  formed  in  any  different  way, 
psychologically,  from  the  ways  in  which  we  have  seen  them  forming. 
That  is  the  soul  of  modernism  as  contrasted  with  authoritarianism. 

To  men  who  have  reached  this  point  of  view  morals  can  no  longer 
seem  a  superimposition  upon  life.  Ethics  is  life  at  the  best  we  have 
found  in  it  reduced  to  formal  expression.  The  great  adventure  is  the 
testing  out  of  moral  values.  The  vindication  of  a  moraUty  is  its  release 
of  human  resource  for  completer  realization.  Morality  therefore  turns 
out  to  be  merely  one  of  the  names  which  men  of  somewhat  different 
minds  have  given  to  the  standards  of  life  which  they  would  regard  as 
ideal.  We  are  all  after  that  Hfe-program  which  would  satisfy  the  con- 
ditions of  the  human  lot  as  we  conceive  it.  To  some  it  would  be  synony- 
mous with  "holiness,"  to  others  it  would  be  "freedom,"  to  others 
"democracy,"  etc.  Whatever  the  type  of  human  relations  turns  out 
to  be  that  ultimately  convinces  men,  it  will  have  the  commonplace 
content  that  it  orders  the  relations  of  human  beings  to  one  another  so 
as  to  reduce  their  interferences  with  one  another  to  a  minimum  and  so 
as  to  raise  their  helpfulness  to  one  another  to  the  maximum.  But  this 
is  the  desideratum  of  all  positive  ethics,  and  its  process  tends  more  and 
more  to  become  avowed  and  unashamed  social  experimentation. 

Professor  Mecklin's  book,  like  every  other  that  is  vital,  contains 
many  provocations  to  controversy,  but  from  beginning  to  end  it  moves 
in  a  healthy  atmosphere.  It  leads  the  reader  into  large  room.  It 
brings  him  into  circuit  with  the  essential  process  of  knowing  good  and 
evil.  It  is  an  educative  book,  not  a  package  of  predigested  dogmas. 
Its  spirit  may  be  sampled  in  one  of  the  closing  paragraphs: 

The  ultimate  bond  of  the  democracy  of  the  future  cannot  be  eternal 
principles  of  right  embodied  in  a  code  of  laws;  it  cannot  be  the  selfish  ties  of 
business;  it  cannot  be  the  coercive  force  of  government  and  police  control. 
The  only  enduring  basis  upon  which  a  free  people  can  rest  their  political 
loyalties  is  the  conscious  and  reasoned  conviction  of  the  average  man.  The 
democracy  of  the  future  must  be  more  than  a  body  of  laws,  more  than  a  social 
or  political  program;    it  must  also  be  a  faith,  a  loyalty.     For,  after  all,  the 

creative  and  forward  looking  elements  in  human  life  are  our  faiths 

To  state  the  problem  in  psychological  terms,  we  must  secure  in  some  fashion 
an  effective  organization  of  the  sentiments  of  the  average  man  around  those 
comprehensive  pohtical  and  moral  values  lying  at  the  core  of  the  democratic 

ideal  [pp.  435-37]- 

Albion  W.  Small 
University  of  Chicago 


REVIEWS  247 

»  Social  Theory.  By  G.  D.  H.  Cole.  Fellow  of  Magdalen  College, 
Oxford.  New  York:  Frederick  A.  Stokes  Co.,  1920.  Pp.220. 
$1.50. 

This  is  truly  an  exceptional  book.  It  goes  far  toward  vindicating 
the  rash  hope  of  a  few  super-sanguine  American  scholars  that  eventually 
Oxford,  yea  possibly  Harvard,  may  discover  what  has  been  going  on 
since  the  middle  eighteen-seventies  in  the  minds  of  American  sociologists. 
The  publishers  inform  us  that  false  doctrine  need  no  longer  delude,  for 
a  prophet  with  a  new  truth  has  arisen  at  Oxford,  and  his  book  has  already 
been  adopted  as  a  text  at  Harvard.  We  open  the  volume  with  reverence 
and  fear.  We  wish  to  be  devout  in  the  presence  of  new  truth,  yet  we 
tremble  at  the  prospect  of  blinding  revelation.  What  the  effect  may  be 
up>on  Oxford  or  Harvard  vision  we  are  unable  to  state,  but  after  the 
experiment  of  facing  the  demonstration  we  are  in  a  position  to  assure 
normal  readers  that  we  have  issued  from  the  ordeal  without  insufferable 
enlightenment. 

The  substance  of  this  "new"  doctrine  turns  out  to  be  the  inflam- 
matory thesis  that  "relations  of  a  man  to  the  state  do  not  furnish  the 
whole,  or  even  the  greater  part  of  his  social  existence  "  (p.  4).  Inasmuch 
as  this  idea  has  been  remaking  social  science  since  Treitschke  supposed 
he  had  strangled  it  a-borning  before  i860,  and  inasmuch  as  multitudes 
of  people  who  have  had  their  schooling  in  the  United  States  since  1900 
would  be  hard  to  convince  that  anyone  ever  had  a  different  thought,  the 
author  need  have  no  fear  that  his  doctrine  will  be  received  as  a  stranger 
and  an  alien  upon  our  shores. 

To  function  as  a  shock-absorber,  to  break  the  force  of  sudden  colli- 
sion with  the  "new"  truth,  the  second  chapter  is  devoted  to  elucidation 
of  seven  words,  viz.:  "community,"  "society,"  "customs,"  "institu- 
tions," "associations,"  "members,"  and  "purposes."  In  this  case 
again  the  seed  need  not  waste  itself  upon  sterile  soil.  Since  Professor 
Sumner  begain  in  1874  to  make  Yale  students  acquainted  with  Spencer's 
version  of  facts  to  which  these  names  have  been  applied,  the  number  of 
Americans  who  annually  learn  about  them,  quite  Ukely  in  more  critical 
terms  than  these  seven,  and  with  more  coherent  exposition  of  them,  has 
grown  to  thousands.  Should  fulsome  advertising  call  the  book  to  their 
attention,  the  reaction  of  the  majority  might  conceivably  be  that  of 
Oliver  Twist — demand  for  a  more  satisfying  portion. 

In  elaborating  his  novel  version  of  Western  society  the  author  makes 
use  of  a  bibUography  of  some  forty  titles.  Of  these,  with  a  single 
exception,  not  one  might  be  successfully  impeached  on  the  ground  of  an 


248  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

American  taint  in  its  origin.  This  is  well.  Otherwise  ingenuous 
American  youth  might  fall  under  the  illusion  that  Oxford  notices  Ameri- 
can books.  In  spite  of  the  fact  that  since  1883  Americans  have  been 
developing  a  literature  which  has  brought  to  light  much  social  reality 
that  had  previously  been  hid,  and  although  it  has  long  been  a  relatively 
belated  American  college  in  which  the  essentials  of  human  association 
have  not  been  analyzed  with  a  creditable  degree  of  competence,  there 
is  still  room  for  a  conspectus  of  the  most  commonplace  sociological 
generalizations  adapted  to  the  comprehension  of  the  youngest  beginners. 
If  teachers  welcome  the  announcement  of  this  book  in  the  hope  that  it 
has  met  this  want,  they  will  be  disappointed.  It  certainly  does  not  fill 
any  other  gap. 

From  a  first  glance  one  receives  the  impression  that  the  book  has 
reduced  profundities  laboriously  fathomed  by  many  men  to  a  simplicity 
of  expression  which  had  not  previously  been  achieved.  Further  atten- 
tion shows  that  the  discussion  is  not  aimed  at  a  single  public.  At  one 
step  it  appears  to  be  addressed  to  children.  A  moment  later  it  falls 
into  a  manner  appropriate  only  in  discussion  with  philosophers  or 
seasoned  politicians.  In  neither  case  does  it  "have  the  punch."  Still 
closer  inspection  detects  passages  which  might  almost  serve  as  samples  of 
the  sort  of  composition  which  deliberately  exaggerates  sententiousness 
into  nonsense.  On  the  whole  candor  compels  the  report  that  the  author 
has  brewed  a  few  famiHar  concepts  and  some  scattered  observation 
into  a  turgidity  against  which  adequate  famiUarity  with  the  sociological 
analyses  of  the  past  two  decades  and  a  consistently  observed  purpose 
might  have  been  a  protection. 

Albion  W.  Small 

University  of  Chicago 


National  Evolution.  By  George  R.  Davies.  Chicago:  A.  C. 
McClurg  &  Co.,  1919.     Pp.  xii+159.     $0.75. 

This  little  volume  is  a  condensed  treatment  of  social  evolution  or 
social  progress,  with  the  emphasis  upon  its  economic  features.  In  the 
first  of  its  four  chapters  the  author  discusses  the  elements — especially 
economic —  of  social  evolution,  such  as  the  estabhshment  of  the  principle 
of  private  property,  the  centralization  and  integration  of  capital,  and 
their  culmination  in  the  nations  of  ancient  history. 

Under  the  title  "Christian  Civilization"  he  considers  Western  civili- 
zation as  the  direct  evolution  from  the  Roman  Empire,  the  cultural 
movement  being  Christianity.     He  traces  the  evolution  of  Christianity 


REVIEWS  249 

from  the  Hebrew  civilization;  its  solidification  in  the  papal  empire  and 
its  evolution  through  the  Reformation ;  Puritanism,  with  its  Calvinistic 
theology;  its  spread  through  the  rise  and  domination  of  English  power, 
under  which  arose  a  new  aristocracy  of  money — of  commercial  and 
factory  properties;  the  changes  of  the  nineteenth  century,  bringing  in 
the  rise  of  Germany  through  centralized  organization  and  specialization; 
and  finally  American  democracy  based  upon  individualism. 

The  chapter  on  "Modern  Capitalism"  is  an  attempt  to  condense  the 
fundamental  principles  of  economic  laws  in  regard  to  capital  into  forty- 
six  pages  and  of  course  is  technical  and  crowded. 

Under  '* National  Progress"  the  author  calls  attention  to  the  neces- 
sity of  rebuilding  the  nation  on  the  basis  of  competitive  service  and  the 
socialization  of  society  instead  of  private  ownership  of  capital  properties. 

This  brief,  concise  work  is  on  the  whole  sound  and  constructive  and 
will  be  of  special  value  to  the  reader  whose  time  is  limited. 

G.  S.  Dow 

Baylor  University 


Modern  Science  and  Materialism.  By  Hugh  Elliot.  London: 
Longmans,  Green  &  Co.,  1919.     Pp.  iv+211.     $3.00. 

It  is  difl5cult  not  to  be  unjust  to  Modern  Science  and  Materialism. 
Its  science  is  above  reproach  and  occupies  the  center  of  the  author's 
interest  and  the  bulk  of  the  book.  The  attitude  of  the  modern  scientist 
toward  the  physical  universe  has  been  represented  with  the  perfect 
faithfulness  and  profound,  detailed  knowledge  of  a  member  of  the  cult. 
Beginning  with  a  frank  acceptance  of  "scientific  agnosticism,"  of  "a 
philosophy  ....  strictly  based  on  facts  "  the  author  proceeds  through 
the  greater  portion  of  the  book  to  develop  the  cosmology  of  telescope 
and  microscope.  The  problems,  he  finds,  are:  (i)  the  material  structure 
of  the  universe;  (2)  the  constitution  of  matter;  (3)  life  and  conscious- 
ness. These  problems  are  treated  convincingly;  they  can  be  unquali- 
fiedly recommended  to  any  reader  who  is  interested  in  a  bird's-eye  view 
of  modern  astromomy,  physics,  and  biology. 

But  it  is  impossible  to  say  more  of  the  author's  "materialism"  than 
that  it  is  what  physical  science  always  is  when  it  attempts  to  substitute 
itself  for  life.  Granted  that  one's  views  should  be  strictly  based  on  facts, 
but  what  are  facts  ?  Let  us  waive  the  author's  omissions.  Sociologists 
may,  perhaps,  wonder  whether  the  philosophy  of  life  need  contain  no 
reference  to  the  facts  of  social  organization  and  intercourse;  theirs  is 
very  likely  a  narrow  and  sectarian  interest. 


25©  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

It  is  the  quality,  not  the  identity,  of  the  microscopic  fact  that  gives 
offense.  What  are  the  facts  of  science?  Conventions,  says  Poincare; 
metaphysical  entities,  says  Russell;  preconceptions,  says  Veblen.  In 
other  words  they  are  very  like  the  ordinary  facts  of  life — like  the  season's 
crop  of  profiteers  and  presidential  nominees.  There  is  nothing  magical 
about  them  except  the  regard  in  which  they  are  held. 

The  presumption  is  that  life  contains  many  things,  some  reduced  to 

"  science  "  and  some  not.     "  The  majority  of  philosophers  hold  that  there 

are  other  means  to  knowledge  besides  those  of  natural  science"  (p.  135). 

Quite  so. 

C.  E.  Ayres 

Amherst  College 


Sovietism:    The  A   B  C  of  Russian  Bolshevism  According  to  the 

Bolshevists.      By  William  English  Walling.     New  York: 

E.  P.  Dutton  &  Co.,  1920.     Pp.  ix+220.     $2.00. 

This  book  does  well  what  it  engages  to  do,  viz.,  sift  such  evidence  as  is 

available  from  bolshevist  sources  in  order  to  give  the  general  pubUc  an 

authentic  account  of  what  the  bolshevists  themselves  think  bolshevism 

is.     Mr.  Walling  has  little  sympathy  with  the  men,  hke  Alonzo  E.  Taylor, 

WilUam  C.  Bullitt,  Raymond  Robins,  and  their  kind,  who  virtually 

assume  that  bolshevism  is  to  be  judged  by  its  Utopian  hopes  rather  than 

by  its  works  and  their  total  effects.     He  assumes  on  the  contrary  that 

the  judgments  of  value  which  leading  bolshevists  have  advertised  are 

so  repugnant  to  most  Western  minds  that  it  is  needless  to  wait  for  their 

refutation  by  the  logic  of  events  before  condemning  them.     The  book 

should  do  much  as  an  antiseptic  against  the  bolshevist  poison. 

Albion  W.  Small 

Univeesity  of  Chicago 


New  Towns  after  the  War:  An  Argument  for  Garden  Cities.  By 
New  Townsmen.  New  York:  E.  P.  Dutton  &  Co.,  19 19. 
$0.60. 

A  brilliant  statement  of  the  housing  situation  in  England  with  an 
epigrammatic  analysis  of  the  remedies  that  might  be  applied  should 
English  conservatism  be  bold  enough  to  realize  the  dangers  that  super- 
urbanism  presents. 

The  book  is  mainly  a  plea  for  the  distribution  of  population,  the 
creation  of  garden  cities  with  limitations  upon  populational  growth,  and 


REVIEWS  251 

the  decentralization  of  industry  in  order  to  bring  workers  in  closer 
contact  with  rural  life  and  rural  resources  for  normal  living. 

The  garden  cities  of  the  Lctchworth  type  are  held  before  the  reader 
as  the  most  successful  experiment  in  the  creation  of  new  cities,  and 
various  methods  of  financing  including  co-operative  methods,  industrial 
financing,  and  government  subsidy  are  advocated. 

This  small  booklet,  emanating  from  some  friend  or  friends  of  the 

English   Garden   City  movement,   despite  its  brevity  and  somewhat 

propagandistic  character,  states  clearly  many  of  the  recognized  causes 

of  our  confused  methods  of  municipal  engineering  and  suggests  practical 

solutions,  which  in  the  end  are  bound  to  find  recognition  in  the  city 

building  efforts  of  both  England  and  America. 

Carol  Aronovici 
San  Francisco 


Inbreeding  and  Outbreeding:  Their  Genetic  and  Sociological  Sig- 
nificance. By  Edwin  M.  East,  Ph.D.,  and  Donald  F. 
Jones,  Sc.D.  Philadelphia:  J.  B.  Lippincott  Co.,  1919. 
Pp.  285.     $2.50. 

The  first  eleven  chapters  of  this  monograph  consist  of  conclusions 
carefully  arrived  at  inductively,  from  much  data  observed  by  the  authors 
and  others.  The  conclusion  is  presented  that  inbreeding  is  not  in  itself 
harmful  (p.  139).  It  produces  unfavorable  results  only  when  it  un- 
covers undesirable  recessive  characters  and  tends  to  build  up  a  homozy- 
gous type  around  them.  When  properly  controlled,  inbreeding  is  a 
valuable  method  of  purging  the  stock  of  unfavorable  characters.  Any 
consequent  loss  of  vigor  can  be  regained  by  outbreeding  with  other 
favorable  qualities  (p.  140).  On  the  basis  of  these  findings  the  aboUtion 
of  laws  against  the  marriage  of  first  cousins  is  suggested  (p.  235).  The 
conclusions  set  forth  in  the  last  two  chapters  with  regard  to  the  breeding 
of  people  of  superior  ability  and  the  control  of  race  intermixture  on  a 
biological  basis  are  more  tentative  and  possibly  will  be  open  to  more 
objection.  The  authors  hold  that  exceptional  ability,  although  defined 
as  "skill  in  accomplishment"  (p.  232),  is  hereditary  rather  than  environ- 
mental in  its  origin.  They  assert:  "The  hereditary  factors  which 
contribute  toward  the  possibility  of  genius  are  numerous.  Only  occa- 
sionally is  the  proper  combination  brought  together"  (pp.  233-34),  but 
they  admit  that  "no  one  knows  what  the  component  parts  of  these 
desirable  qualities  are,  or  can  distinguish  by  external  traits  the  individual 
who  carries  them"  (p.  234).     They  explain  adventitious  genius  on  the 


252  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

assumption  of  chance  combinations  of  unrecognized  traits  of  ability 
widely  scattered  throughout  the  race  (p.  235).  They  even  assert  that 
this  is  the  chief  source  of  genius  (p.  244).  To  all  of  this  the  sociologist 
with  an  environmental  bias  may  answer  that  until  the  biologists  produce 
data  instead  of  assumptions  based  on  analogy  in  support  of  their  con- 
clusions, Lester  F.  Ward's  arguments  {Applied  Sociology)  have  as  much 
evidence  back  of  them  as  these. 

In  regard  to  the  crossing  of  races  they  say:  "The  hybridization  of 
extremes  is  undesirable  because  of  the  improbability  of  regaining  the 
merits  of  the  originals,  yet  hybridization  of  somewhat  nearly  related 
races  is  almost  a  prerequisite  to  rapid  progress,  for  from  such  hybridi- 
zation comes  that  moderate  amount  of  variability  which  presents  the 
possibiUty  of  the  super-individual,  the  genius"  (p.  263).  Thus  they 
would  oppose  the  intermingUng  biologically  of  white,  black,  and  yellow 
races,  but  they  would  urge  the  interbreeding  of  peoples  of  Western 
Europe  and  the  United  States,  including  the  Jews. 

L.  L.  Bernard 

UNrVERSITY   OF  MINNESOTA 


German  Social  Democracy  during  the  War.     By  Edwyn  Bevan. 
New  York:  E.  P.  Button  &  Co.,  1919.     Pp.  x+280.     $2.50. 

This  book  gives  an  interesting  and  enlightening  narrative  of  the 
activities  and  deUberations  of  the  Social  Democratic  party  from  the 
beginning  of  the  war  to  the  close  of  the  administration  of  Chancellor 
Michaelis  in  October,  191 7.  The  narrative  is  based  on  pubUshed  docu- 
ments, speeches  reported  in  the  Social  Democratic  press,  etc.  The 
attention  centers  about  the  spUt  in  the  party — the  varying  struggle 
between  the  will  to  support  the  government  and  vote  war  appropriations 
and  the  conviction  that  Germany  and  Austria  were  the  aggressors  in  the 
war  and,  therefore,  that  the  goverment's  war  policy  should  be  unyield- 
ingly opposed.  The  troublesome  minority  grows  steadily  in  influence 
under  an  ever-changing  leadership,  but  this  growth  finds  its  explanation 
in  the  fact  that  the  masses  were  worn  out  by  the  exactions  of  the  war  and 
were  clamoring  for  peace.  The  author,  in  his  Preface,  calls  attention 
to  the  fact  that,  with  the  collapse  of  Russian  opposition  on  the  Eastern 
front,  this  desire  for  peace  changed  to  enthusiastic  support  of  the  gov- 
ernment. One  notes  with  interest  the  characterization  of  many  well- 
know  party  leaders — and  their  dramatic  outbursts  against  autocratic 
military  domination. 

Robert  Fry  Clark 

Pacific  University 


REVIEWS  2  S3 

Extreme  Urgence.  By  Georges  BENOix-LfvY.  Paris:  L'Asso- 
ciation  des  Cit^s-Jardins,  1920.     Pp.  46. 

The  cost  of  construction  in  France  has  increased  to  threefold  the 
pre-war  prices,  and  Mr.  Benoit-Levy  endeavors  to  discuss  methods 
of  cost  reduction  in  home  building.  Unfortunately  the  emphasis  is 
placed  upon  a  reduction  downward  of  standards  rather  than  an  adjust- 
ment of  production  costs.  We  are  already  facing  such  a  situation  in  the 
United  States  with  the  result  that  the  compactness  of  the  homes 
demanded  by  increased  costs  is  bound  to  react  upon  home  life  by  pro- 
ducing a  shrinkage  in  its  social  as  well  as  in  its  future  economic  value. 

If  a  satisfactory  relation  between  wages  and  rents  can  only  be 

maintained  by  a  reduction  in  the  size,  character,  and  quality  of  the 

home  the  remedy  is  not  to  be  sought  in  compromises  and  devices  for 

the  compact  storage  of  the  human  family  but  in  the  economic  system 

itself. 

Carol  Aronovici 

San  Fr.\ncisco 


RECENT    LITERATURE 


NOTES   AND   ABSTRACTS 

Durkheim's  Contribution  to  the  Reconstruction  of  Political  Theory. — Durkheim's 
political  theories  are  based  upon  the  proposal  to  strengthen  the  occupational  group 
at  the  expense  of  the  economic  functions  of  the  state,  and  to  make  it  the  basis  of 
representation  in  the  law-making  body.  The  state  is  too  slow-moving,  incompetent, 
and  ill-adapted  to  deal  with  the  highly  specialized  industrial  activities  and  relations 
of  the  present  day.  Therefore  (i)  there  is  needed  an  arrangement  for  dividing  the 
control  of  industrial  relations  between  the  state  and  occupational  groups.  In  this 
way  the  evils  of  bureaucracy  can  be  avoided  and  expert  control  of  industry  secured; 
(2)  this  method  would  avoid  a  centralized  and  all-powerful  state  and  yet  secure  for 
labor  a  large  degree  of  authority  in  regulating  its  own  conditions;  (3)  as  Durkheim 
would  give  his  occupational  groups  a  corporate  organization,  his  scheme  bears  a 
close  similarity  to  the  theory  of  Gierke,  Maitland,  and  Figgis  which  would  make  the 
state  a  union  of  lesser  corporate  groups;  (4)  and  finally  his  notion  of  the  supremacy 
of  the  functional  organization  of  society  over  the  segmentary  or  territorial  organi- 
zation is  in  harmony  with  Professor  Giddings'  contention  that  civilization  is  charac- 
terized by  a  constantly  increasing  subordination  of  the  social  composition  to  the 
social  constitution.  Durkheim's  political  theories  constitute  in  one  particular  phase 
one  of  the  most  advanced  and  most  satisfactory  of  sociological  positions  in  regard 
to  political  and  economic  problems. — Harry  E.  Barnes,  Political  Science  Quarterly, 
June,  ig2o.  C.  N. 

The  Principles  in  Accordance  with  Which  Public  Opinion  Can  Be  Formed  by  the 
Church  Democratically  and  Effectively. — Propaganda  rules  the  world;  but  it  is  not 
the  propaganda  of  the  church.  Up  to  the  present,  perhaps,  this  has  been  fortunate, 
because  the  church  is  only  beginning  to  become  truly  Christian.  The  transition  from 
non-Christian  society  to  Christian  society  can  only  be  effected  by  the  formation  and 
guidance  of  an  effective  public  opinion,  because  that  is  the  only  mechanism  by  which 
conscious  social  changes  are  effected.  The  Christian  churches  must  endeavor  to 
create  an  effective  Christian  public  conscience  regarding  all  relations  of  individuals, 
classes,  nations,  and  races.  The  problem  of  creating  Christian  society  is  essentially 
the  problem  of  developing  Christian  mores,  which  are  the  product  of  public  opinion. 
The  mores  of  barbarism  largely  survive  among  us  but  they  must  be  replaced  by 
Christian  mores.  That  means  if  we  want  a  Christian  society,  we  must  capture 
public  opinion  for  the  Christian  program.  This  public  opinion  does  not  imply  uni- 
formity of  opinion — rather  one  which,  requiring  unity  in  essentials,  would  leave 
liberty  in  nonessentials.  This  public  opinion  must  not  be  confused  with  public 
sentiment  and  popular  emotion  but  is  a  more  or  less  rational  collective  judgment. 
The  principle  in  accordance  with  which  such  public  opinion  can  be  formed  democrati- 
cally and  effectively  by  the  church  are  first,  it  must  be  formed  under  conditions  of 
freedom;  second,  it  must  be  formed  under  conditions  of  obvious  disinterestedness;  and 
third,  it  must  be  intelligent.  This  means  a  greater  appreciation  by  the  church  of 
social  service.  To  form  and  guide  public  opinion  the  church  may  use  various  agencies 
such  as  oral  discussion,  the  press,  and  the  church  school. — Charles  A.  Ellwood,  Reli- 
gious Education,  April,  1920.  R-  G.  H. 

Church  School  and  Public  Opinion. — The  church  school  as  one  of  the  educational 
institutions  must  raise  the  question,  What  is  its  responsibility  in  the  formation  of 
public  opinion  ?  The  educational  psychologists  like  Dewey  and  Thorndike  tell  us 
that  culturally  each  generation  is  at  the  mercy  of  its  informal  and  formal  education. 
If  the  church  of  Jesus  Christ  is  the  one  and  only  institution  openly  and  frankly  com- 
mitted to  the  idealism  of  Jesus,  then  the  burden  of  responsibility  with  reference  to 

2S4 


RECENT  LITERATURE  255 

the  formation  of  public  opinion  centered  in  this  idealism  rests  upon  the  church  school. 
There  are  at  least  four  things  the  church  school  needs  to  do  more  zealously  and  in  a 
more  Christian  way.  The  first  of  these  is  to  rejuvenate  the  Home  Department. 
The  center  of  responsibility  in  all  education  is  the  home.  The  second  thing  is  to 
socialize  its  own  curriculum.  We  are  to  have  not  Bible  Schools,  but  schools  of  religion; 
that  is,  of  life.  We  need  to  Christianize  the  attitude  toward  money  and  foreigners 
and  colored  people.  In  the  third  place  there  is  a  big  opportunity  to  form  public 
opinion  through  the  church  school  in  its  worship.  The  average  worship  in  the  church 
school  is  of  the  individual  salvation  type  and  does  not  develop  a  social  democracy 
saturated  with  the  idealism  of  Jesus. 

Finally,  more  work  of  a  real  practical  nature  needs  to  be  done,  not  only  in  our 
thinking,  but  also  in  our  giving,  if  we  would  expect  a  sane  and  workable  practice  of 
social  service  and  internationalism.  We  need  to  develop  a  public  opinion  that  goes 
deeper  than  philanthropy  and  charity.  Only  thus  can  the  church  school  create  such 
a  public  opinion  and  practice  as  will  eventually  Christianize  all  social,  economic, 
industrial,  national,  and  international  ideals. — Fred  L.  Brownlee,  Religious  Educa- 
tion, June,  1920.  R.  G.  H. 

The  Effect  of  the  War  on  the  Chief  Factors  of  Population  Changes. — There  are 
three  factors  fundamentally  concerned  in  producing  changes  in  the  absolute  size  of  the 
population  in  a  given  area:  (i)  the  birth-rate;  (2)  the  death-rate;  (3)  the  net  immi- 
gration rate.  Of  these  factors  the  two  first  are  of  the  greatest  biological  interest. 
This  is  true  of  such  political  units  as  France,  Prussia,  and  Bavaria,  where  in  normal 
times  net  immigration  makes  no  significant  contribution  to  the  population.  The 
official  statistics  show  that  (i)  in  the  year  prior  to  the  beginning  of  the  war  the  death- 
rate  of  France  was  at  nearly  twice  as  high  a  level  as  in  any  of  the  other  countries  dealt 
with;  (2)  in  all  the  countries  here  dealt  with  the  death-birth  ratio  in  general  rises 
throughout  the  war  period,  i.e.,  the  proportion  of  deaths  to  births  increased  as  long 
as  the  war  continued.  In  France  it  was  slightly  more  than  double  in  1918  what  it 
was  in  1913.  The  same  was  true  of  Prussia  and  Bavaria.  These  states  started  from 
a  ver>-  different  base  in  1913,  and  the  relative  rise  was  even  greater;  (3)  in  England 
this  death-birth  ratio  increase  was  markedly  slower  than  in  any  other  countries  dealt 
with;  (4)  the  epidemic  of  influenza  in  1918  seems  to  have  had  the  greatest  effect  upon 
England  and  Wales.  The  biological  reactions  of  the  French  and  Germans  in  respect 
to  this  most  fundamental  phenomenon,  the  death-birth  ratio,  were  essentially  the 
same,  though  they  started  from  different  pre-war  bases.  England's  biological 
reaction  to  war  was  much  less  pronounced,  due  to  the  better  food  conditions  and  to  a 
different  race  psychology  from  that  of  the  other  belligerents. — Raymond  Pearl, 
Science,  June,  1920.  C.  N. 

Om  Geniet  som  Biologisk  Problem. — Genius  cannot  be  taught  but  is  determined 
in  the  natural  biological  process.  When  the  male  and  female  germ-cells  meet  it  is 
possible,  but  not  probable,  that  new  values  may  be  created  by  a  new  constellation 
of  the  respective  chromosomes.  The  determiners  of  heredity  in  the  spermatozoa 
and  egg-cell  do  not  usually  combine  in  the  production  of  wholly  new  attributes. 
Genius  can  generally  not  be  explained  through  the  common  laws  of  heredity.  A 
partial  e.xplanation  has  come  from  an  unexpected  quarter,  namely,  the  theory  of 
degeneration  which  was  set  forth  by  Morel  as  early  as  1859.  Degeneration  is  a 
much  misused  word  popularly  having  a  derogatorj^  meaning.  Degeneration 
applies  chiefly  to  the  psychical  but  is  also  evidenced  by  certain  bodily  stigmata 
such  as  anomalies  in  bone-structure,  especially  the  face  and  cranium,  etc.  A  sur- 
prisingly large  number  of  men  of  great  genius  have  had  serious  physical  defects. 
In  the  eighties,  Lombroso  put  forth  the  startling  theory  that  genius,  despite  its  superi- 
ority, is  closely  related  to  degeneration,  the  stigmata  of  which  are  not  to  be  mistaken. 
Nordau  and  Toulouse  have  followed  Lombroso,  the  latter  regarding  genius  as  a  kind 
of  neurosis.  Their  generalizations  do  not  seem  to  apply  to  all  men  of  genius  but 
their  large  collection  of  evidence  seems  to  confirm  the  main  thesis.  In  regard  to 
offspring  the  relation  of  genius  to  degeneration  is  very  apparent.  Genius  develops 
spontaneously  its  own  destruction.  A  climax  or  culmination  has  been  reached  and 
thereafter  there  is  an  inevitable  downward  trend. — S.  Laache,  Samtiden,  June,  1920. 

O.  B.  Y. 


256  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

Der  Nachwuchs  der  begabten  Frauen. — It  is  not  only  a  commonplace,  but  is 
shown  by  statistics,  that  talented  men  and  women  have  fewer  offspring  than  the 
ungifted.  The  same  tendency  that  prevails  among  men  is  evident  among  women;  the 
more  gifted  are  less  sexually  inclined,  and  do  not  permit  motherhood  to  interfere  with 
their  other  activities.  However,  in  this  manner  the  continuation  of  the  race  is  left  to 
those  women  who  have  no  other  capacity.  The  observation  that  personal  achievement 
is  always  accompanied  by  reduced  sexual  tendency  among  both  sexes  has,  however, 
been  subject  to  a  twofold  interpretation.  In  the  case  of  man,  the  fact  has  simply 
been  noted  as  self-evident;  in  the  case  of  woman,  the  attitude  has  been  quite  different. 
All  biologists  are  trying  to  impress  upon  woman  that  it  is  a  crime  against  the  race  if 
she  places  the  expression  of  her  talents  above  her  maternal  function,  even  though,  in 
the  possession  of  the  former,  she  is  not  naturally  inferior  to  man.  Especially  the  most 
gifted  women  are  urged  to  make  more  than  the  ordinary  contribution  to  the  continua- 
tion of  the  race,  in  order  to  pass  on  to  future  generations  their  unusual  abilities. 
The  demand  of  Schallmeyer  that  woman  must  first  of  all  perform  her  generative 
function,  is,  from  the  standpoint  of  eugenics,  pure  nonsense.  How  will  the  race 
benefit,  if  the  woman  gives  up  her  abilities  and  devotes  herself  exclusively  to  bearing 
children  of  a  father  who  is  not  her  equal  in  generative  capacity?  For,  if  man  is  per- 
mitted to  exhaust  his  virility  in  unrestrained  pursuit  of  personal  achievement,  his 
contribution  to  the  offspring  must  be  inferior  to  woman's,  and  woman's  sacrifice  of 
her  personal  achievements  is  economically  and  culturally  a  great  waste,  and  detrimental 
to  the  nation.  In  biographical  studies  of  famous  persons,  it  is,  in  the  case  of  woman, 
invariably  discussed  whether  her  maternal  functions  were  neglected;  but  in  the  case 
of  man,  it  is  rarely  asked  whether  the  paternal  function  has  been  unfavorably  affected. 
From  the  standpoint  of  racial  biology,  the  prevalent  tendency  to  emphasize  this 
eugenic  factor  in  the  case  of  women  only,  can  be  explained  solely  on  the  basis  of  a 
social  order  in  which  men  have  superior  control.  Such  one-sided  control  always  leads 
to  illogical  conclusions.  The  anxiety  concerning  a  talented  woman's  fulfilment  of 
her  sexual  duty,  only  arises  where  these  women  have  chosen  the  path  of  personal 
achievement.  Ehrhard  Riecke  in  "Der  Mediziner  u.  die  sexuelle  Frage"  {Zeitschrifi 
fiir  Sexudunssenschaft,  1914,  S.  109)  has  called  attention  to  the  fact  that  often  not 
the  worst  women  become  prostitutes,  but  women  who  might  have  been  highly  valuable 
in  the  evolution  of  the  race.  But  do  men  wage  a  campaign  against  prostitution  to 
prevent  this  social  waste?  Here,  no  mention  is  made  of  the  importance  of  the  con- 
tinuation of  the  race.  Prostitution  is  legally  established.  In  conclusion,  there  can 
be  but  one  law  applicable  to  both  sexes:  the  harmonizing  of  individual  and  generative 
capacities. — M.  Vaerting,  Die  neue  Generation,  September,  1919.  L.  M.  S. 

Der  Konflikt  zwischen  der  individuellen  u.  generativen  Leistung  beim  Men- 
schen. — In  the  past,  the  tragic  import  of  the  conflict  between  individual  achievement 
and  generation  has  not  been  fully  comprehended  and  therefore  no  efforts  have  been 
made  to  harmonize  both  activities.  The  former  has  been  relegated  to  man  as  the 
chief  function  of  life;  to  woman,  the  latter.  The  folly  of  this  procedure  can  be  meas- 
ured by  its  results.  Particularly  in  the  family  of  the  most  gifted,  man's  intellectual 
achievement  was  put  above  all  else,  while  woman  denied  herself  all  creative  expression 
except  that  of  bearing  children  and  catering  to  the  comforts  of  her  farnily.  The 
progeny  of  such  unions,  with  few  exceptions,  are  even  below  the  average;  within  a  few 
generations,  they  have  completely  degenerated.  Raibmayer,  in  "Genie  u.  Talent," 
has  made  a  careful  study  of  the  rapid  extinction  of  the  families  of  talented  rnen. 
Pontus  Fahlbeck,  in  a  study  of  Swedish  aristocracy  has  shown  that  it  became  extinct 
even  in  the  fourth  generation  after  it  achieved  historical  prominence.  Lorenz  has 
shown  the  same  to  be  the  case  among  the  peasant  stock  of  Sa.xony.  Every  disease  of 
races,  which  resulted  in  their  extinction,  had  its  final  cause  in  the  di\asion  made  between 
personal  accomplishment  and  purely  generative  activity,  in  which  the  latter  was 
chiefly  relegated  to  woman.  The  eugenic  failures  of  the  past,  instead  of  being  viewed 
in  the  light  of  terrible  warnings  of  nature,  have  been  viewed  as  inexorable  biological 
laws;  and  their  causes  continue  to  flourish.  Only  recently,  Bumm  said  in  his  address 
on  "Frauenstudium,"  "Our  children  must  be  born  of  women  who  have  rested  brains, 
and  time  for  the  rearing  of  numerous  offspring.  Thus  woman  is  of  greatest  service  to 
herself,  the  family,  and  the  state."     But  woman  has  had  a  "rested  brain"  for  thousands 


RECENT  LITERATURE  257 

of  years.  Her  "rested  brain"  is  useless  where  man  undermines  his  virility  in  the 
pursuit  of  individual  achievement.  In  vain  has  woman  sacrificed  her  personal  accom- 
plishments where  man  pursued  his  to  the  detriment  of  his  parental  activities.  In  man, 
the  se.Kual  capacities  attain  their  highest  development  before  the  intellectual.  Due  to 
economic  conditions  and  the  prolonged  preparations  for  a  vocation,  the  maximum 
capacity  of  both  phases  of  his  activities  are  allowed  to  pass  unutilized.  In  woman, 
the  periods  of  maximum  mental  and  physical  ability  coincide,  but  develop  later.  In 
the  past,  neither  of  her  capacities  has  been  fully  utilized.  She  was  practically 
excluded  from  personal  achievement,  and  her  generative  powers  were  not  realized 
to  the  best  advantage  because  an  early  marriage  occurred  before  the  maximum  intel- 
lectual powers  were  developed.  The  state  should  enable  woman  to  realize  both  capaci- 
ties to  the  best  advantage.  Woman  must  remember  that  it  is  not  significant  who 
bathes  the  child,  or  looks  after  its  physical  needs  generally,  but  what  sort  of  mother 
gives  birth  to  it.  Her  functions  as  the  giver  of  life  are  vastly  more  important  than 
those  of  mere  caretaker. — M.  Vaerting,  Die  Nene  Generation,  January,  1920.    L.  M.  S. 

A  Study  of  Multiple  Criminal  Factors. — A  program  of  psychiatrical  and  psy- 
chological examining  for  correctional  institutions  of  the  state  of  New  Jersey  has 
recently  been  initiated  by  Commissioner  Burdette  G.  Lewis,  under  the  authority  of 
the  State  Board  of  Control  of  Institutions  and  Agencies  of  New  Jersey.  It  provides 
for  applying  the  army  group-test  methods,  supplemented  by  extensive  individual 
examinations.  In  the  psychological  examinations  a  special  information  blank 
has  been  developed  as  a  supplement  to  the  diagnostic  clinical  syllabus.  This  is 
employed  in  clinical  examinations  to  render  the  examinations  as  informal  and  unobjec- 
tionable as  possible  to  the  prisoner  who  tends  to  resist  formal  examination.  The 
statistical  analysis  of  the  results  obtained  in  the  clinical  psychological  examinations 
by  direct  tests  and  the  information  blank  yields  valuable  data  for  the  investigation 
of  the  interrelation  of  criminal  factors.  The  New  Jersey  state  prison  has  instituted 
a  card-filing  system  for  each  man  and  the  data  from  these  cards  have  been  tabulated 
in  statistical  fashion  in  such  a  manner  that,  not  only  is  a  summary  obtained  regarding 
the  distribution  of  each  of  these  factors,  but  also  a  graphic  portrayal  of  the  interrelation 
of  each  factor  to  any  other  factor. — Edgar  A.  I)oll,  Journal  of  Criminal  Law  and 
Crimitiology,  May,  1920.  O.  B.  Y. 

Improper  Use  of  the  Intelligence  Quotient. — There  is  a  marked  tendency  in 
recent  literature  to  use  the  intelligence  quotient  for  purposes  to  which  it  is  not  directly 
applicable.  This  use  of  the  intelligence  quotient  is  improper  from  the  scientific 
standpoint  and  very  greatly  restricts  the  value  of  many  otherwise  valuable  contri- 
butions. The  intelligence  quotient  is  founded  on  two  important  assumptions  which 
psychology  cannot  at  present  afiford  to  concede  and  which  have  as  yet  very  little 
foundation  in  experimental  evidence.  The  first  of  these  assumes  that  the  average 
limit  of  the  growth  of  intelligence  is  16  years;  the  second  assumes  that  intelligence 
growth  is  constant  for  the  individual  throughout  the  developmental  period,  or  at 
least  between  4  years  and  16  years.  The  assumption  that  the  average  level  of 
intelligence  of  adults  is  a  mental  age  of  16  is  apparently  founded  on  the  fact  that  the 
median  intelligence  of  32  high-school  students  and  30  business  men  is  16  years.  But 
high-school  students  and  business  men  are  not  "average"  adults.  Psychological 
examination  in  the  army  has  clearly  indicated  that  the  typical  or  average  adult  has  a 
mental  age  between  13  and  14  years.  As  to  the  second  assumption  it  may  be  said 
that  the  intelligence  growth  is  constant  on  the  average  only  in  relation  to  a  scale  of 
tests  whose  fundamental  principle  of  standardization  presupposes  this  constancy. 
In  the  second  place,  significant  variations  in  intelligence  growth  are  obscured  in  the 
intelligence  quotient  expression  of  intelligence  status  because  any  change  in  mental 
age  from  year  to  year  is  "liquidated"  or  spread  out  over  the  entire  previous  ages  of 
the  individual. — Edgar  A.  Doll,  The  Journal  of  Delinquency,  May,  1920.      O.  B.  Y. 

The  Origin  and  Cure  of  "the  Bad  Boy." — The  factors  connected  with  criminals 
are  heredity  and  environment.  The  analysis  of  the  genesis  of  crime  is  exceedingly 
difl&cult.     Yet  from  the  comprehensive  studies  of  recent  years  it  can  be  ascertained 


2S8 


THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 


that  thirteen  is  the  age  of  greatest  delinquency  among  boys  and  fifteen  among  girls. 
Again  it  is  agreed  that  there  are  two  classes  of  criminals,  (i)  the  accidental  who  is 
betrayed  into  a  solitary  crime,  (2)  the  habitual — the  man  who  makes  crime  a  pro- 
fession and  lives  by  it.  It  is  also  admitted  that  not  only  the  health,  but  also  the  age, 
of  the  mother  has  an  influence  upon  the  child's  vitality  and  physique.  The  maternal 
capacity  for  nourishing  the  embryo  requires  some  time  to  attain  its  maximum,  and 
then  undergoes  a  gradual  decline.  Children  and  youths  reared  in  city  slums  or  who 
work  in  stuffy  offices  or  ill-ventilated  workshops  are  retarded  in  physical  and  mental 
growth.  The  first  condition  of  treatment  is  to  understand  the  genesis  of  the  offender, 
for  every  abnormal  or  delinquent  child  represents  some  failure  of  function  in  one  or 
more  social  agencies — home,  school,  church,  state.  .\nd  with  this  more  comprehensive 
diagnosis  of  evil  as  a  defect  of  life  goes  a  mode  of  treatment  that  increasingly  seeks 
for  preventives  and  remedies  in  removing  inhibitions,  and  liberating  the  pent-up 
energies  of  life. — Claude  C.  H.  Williamson,   The  Sociological  Review,  Spring,  1920. 

C.N. 

Causes  of  Delinquency  among  Fifty  Negro  Boys. — "Truancy  among  the  fifty 

Negro  boys  investigated  was  partly  due  to  poor  heritage,  but  principally  to  environ- 
mental conditions  under  which  they  were  forced  to  live,"  is  the  conclusion  of  the 
monograph.  The  subjects  of  this  report  were  inmates  of  parental  schools  in  Los 
Angeles.  The  immediate  causes  for  their  committment  were:  truancy,  42  per  cent; 
incorrigibility,  24  per  cent;  stealing,  16  per  cent;  other  causes,  18  per  cent.  The 
average  age  was  12.5  years.  Three-quarters  of  this  group  of  boys  disliked  going  to 
school.  The  author  offers  as  reasons  for  such  a  condition  the  unsatisfactory  nature  of 
the  elementary-school  curriculum;  failure  to  interest  boys  in  some  industrial  pursuits; 
unfair  treatment  of  certain  boys  by  teachers;  and  lack  of  encouragement.  Only 
fifteen  of  the  group  "like  to  work."  One  reason  offered  is  that  Negro  boys  are  dis- 
criminated against,  being  debarred  from  the  most  remunerative  and  congenial  jobs. 
The  author  graded  the  boys  physically:  normally  good,  62  per  cent;  fairly  good, 
12  per  cent;  poor,  14  per  cent;  and  very  poor,  12  per  cent.  Mentally  he  graded  them: 
keen  mind,  8  per  cent;  normal,  49  per  cent;  dull,  18  per  cent;  feeble-minded  and 
border  line,  24  per  cent.  Of  the  group  26  per  cent  came  to  school  hungry,  56  per  cent 
of  them  had  brothers  or  sisters  in  Juvenile  Hall.  Of  the  fifty  homes  from  which  the 
boys  came,  68  per  cent  were  "broken  homes."  Economically,  50  per  cent  were  classed 
"very  poor"  and  22  per  cent  "poor."  Considering  the  total  number  of  homes,  after 
the  average  rent  was  paid  the  average  amount  left  for  all  the  other  necessities  of  life 
was  23  cents  per  day  per  individual.  Twelve  of  the  families  had  fairly  substantial 
incomes,  which  means  that  the  majority  were  badly  off  indeed.  Only  six  of  the  homes 
were  free  from  immoral  influences.  Twenty-one  of  the  families  were  rated  "bad" 
morally  and  these  were  in  the  poorest  economic  conditions.  From  such  home  con- 
ditions, the  writer  asks,  what  chance  has  a  boy  "to  live  right,  shun  evil,  and  be  a 
credit  to  himself  and  his  race"  ? — H.  K.  Watson,  Studies  in  Sociology,  University  of 
Southern  California.  S.  C.  R. 

Verbrechensprophylaxe  und  Psycho-technlk. — The  importance  of  every  man's 
finding  his  proper  place  in  the  industrial  world  has  become  an  urgent  necessity  in 
Germany  since  the  war  and  gives  greater  prominence  to  experimental  determination 
of  fitness  in  vocational  guidance.  The  work  of  the  Taylor  school  and  of  Miinsterberg 
can  be  made  of  service  in  the  field  of  criminal  prophyla.xis.  The  prevention  of  accidents 
due  to  criminal  negligence  in  the  field  of  transportation,  particularly,  will  not  only 
prevent  economic  loss  and  deaths  resulting  from  such  accidents,  but  will  also  help  to 
diminish  the  number  of  those  liable  to  punishment  for  such  acts.  The  number  of 
those  restrained  from  liberty  because  guilty  of  criminal  negligence  is  appalling,  and  a 
decrease  in  acts  of  delinquency  of  this  nature  would  be  highly  welcome.  .\  systematic 
application  of  psycho-technical  methods  of  investigation  would  result  in  the  elimination, 
of  the  unfit  before  they  have  harmed  themselves  and  others;  it  would  prevent  eco- 
nomic waste,  and  benefit  the  state  in  its  efforts  to  administer  justice.— Gerichtsas- 
sessar  Dr.  iMannheim,  "Koenigsberg  in  Preussen,"  Deutsche  Strafrechls-Zeitung, 
May-June,  1919.  L.  M.  S. 


RECENT  LITERATURE  259 

War  and  Mental  Disorders. — Various  factors  may  come  into  play  in  producing 
nervous  disorders.  Among  such  causes  are  overexertion,  the  lack  of  proper  suste- 
nance, and  atmospheric  disturbances,  such  as  violent  explosion  shocks  and  physical 
injuries.  The  factors  of  causation  are  numerous,  and  since  the  individual's  power  of 
resistance  varies  it  follows  that  there  is  diiBculty  in  placing  many  of  the  cases  in  the 
apparently  definite  categories  of  disorders  at  present  in  use.  The  following  classifi- 
cation may  be  employed:  (i)  the  condition  described  as  neurasthenia,  often  produced 
by  shell-shock,  an  early  stage  of  some  grave  disorder  of  the  nervous  system;  (2)  acute 
alcoholic  insanity,  or  delirium  tremens,  caused  by  excessive  use  of  alcohol;  (3)  a  con- 
fusional  state  in  which  the  patient  becomes  dazed,  disorientated;  (4)  attacks  of  mania 
or  of  melancholia,  either  in  association  with  wounds  or  without  apparent  injury; 
(s)  mental  derangement  leading  to  suicide,  usually  among  those  suffering  from  melan- 
choUa.  Various  forms  of  treatment  were  tried  to  cure  patients.  Both  the  treatment 
by  suggestion  and  psycho-analytic  methods  were  not  of  much  utility. — Hubert  J. 
Norman,  The  Quarterly  Rei'icw,  October,  1919.  C.  N. 

Pauper  Burials  and  the  Interment  of  the  Dead  in  Large  Cities. — This  pamphlet 
begins  with  a  statement  of  the  ancient  origin  of  burial  observances.  It  points  out  that 
burials  are  a  social  and  economic  problem  regarding  which  very  little  investi- 
gation has  been  carried  on.  Industrial  insurance,  it  asserts,  arose  largely  from  the 
need  of  providing  funeral  expenses.  With  its  growth  pauper  burials  have  decreased, 
the  figures  for  thirty-eight  American  cities  showing  a  decline  from  171  per  100,000  in 
1880-84  to  74  per  100,000  in  1915-18.  On  the  basis  of  this  last-given^gure  there  are 
approximately  40,000  pauper  burials  in  a  year.  A  significant  statement  is  found  on 
page  22:  "The  social  and  individual  demand  for  the  decent  burial  of  the  dead,  free 
from  the  taint  of  pauperism  in  any  and  every  form,  is  a  sentiment  than  which  perhaps 
no  other  is  more  deeply  rooted  in  the  human  heart  or  in  human  experience." 

Funerals  are  made  a  means  of  conspicuous  consumption  of  which  the  pamphlet 
gives  a  few  illustrations.  The  funeral  of  the  late  King  of  England  cost  £40,500, 
while  in  1907  caskets  in  New  York  were  on  sale  at  upward  of  $2,000.  There  is  some 
effort  at  funeral  reform,  the  most  radical  step  having  been  taken  in  Switzerland, 
where  five  cantons  give  to  every  deceased  citizen  a  free  decent  burial.  The  pamphlet 
proper  closes  with  an  account  of  burial  customs  in  a  number  of  European  cities  and 
finally  pleads  for  reforms  in  burial  observances.  There  are  seven  appendixes;  one 
gives  the  rules  of  the  burial  society  of  Lanuvium  in  133  a.d.;  a  number  are  statistical; 
one  deals  with  the  anatomical  law  of  Pennsylvania,  and  one  with  pauper  burial  abuses. 
— F.  L.  Hoffman,  Prudential  Insurance  Company  of  America.  S.  C.  R. 

The  Recognition  and  Better  Treatment  for  Mental  and  Nervous  Injuries. — The 

feeble-minded  group  of  workmen  is  responsible  for  many  accidents  despite  the  fact 
that  the  higher  grades  of  feeble-mindedness  have  been  considered  consistent  with 
good  routine  industrial  work  for  years.  But  the  psychopathic  employees  or  cases  of 
dementia  praecox,  are  difficult  to  handle  because  of  a  lack  of  proper  classification  due 
to  inexact  diagnosis.  This  in  turn  impedes  treatment.  The  subdivision,  or  working 
classification  of  psychotics,  is:  (i)  hysteria  after  injury;  (2)  psycasthenia  after  injury; 
(3)  depressed  states  and  melancholia  after  injury  (the  cases  of  the  latter  type  are  more 
frequent  than  is  generally  believed);  (4)  paranoiacs;  (5)  querulents.  By  proper 
diagnosis  and  thorough  understanding  of  the  patient  proper  treatment  may  be  applied 
to  each  case  and  many  psychotics  may  be  remedied. — Francis  D.  Donoghue,  Modern 
Medicine,  December,  1919.  C.  N. 

Some  New  Problems  for  Psychiatric  Research  in  Delinquency. — To  give  a  partial 
list  of  the  well-organized  psychiatric  clinics  dealing  with  crime  and  delinquency  that 
were  operating  before  we  entered  the  war  serves  to  indicate  the  rapid  growth  of  this 
method  of  studying  crime.  Besides  the  clinics  connected  with  the  children's  courts, 
the  clinics  of  Fort  Leavenworth,  Sing  Sing,  the  police  department  and  Department  of 
Corrections  in  New  York  City,  the  municipal  court  in  Boston,  the  Bedford  Refor- 
matory, and  the  Westchester  Department  of  Charities  and  Correction,  represent  a 
field  of  useful  and  practical  work.     Most  of  the  psychiatric  workers  entered  the  army 


26o  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

or  navy  during  the  war.  In  the  army  they  found  a  fairly  definite  special  service,  but 
in  the  navy  there  was  no  special  psychiatric  division.  In  recent  discussion  of  court- 
martial  procedure  none  of  those  interested  seem  to  have  inquired  whether  any  relation 
exists  between  the  terrific  experiences  these  soldiers  have  gone  through  and  control  of 
conduct.  In  spite  of  examinations  in  the  camps,  the  A.E.F.  contained  many  men  of 
less  than  normal  intelligence  or  of  unstable  make-up,  and  these  soldiers,  like  their 
comrades,  were  often  exposed  to  almost  unbelievable  fatigue,  to  the  effects  of  being 
knocked  about  by  shell  concussion  and  to  long  emotional  strain.  Account  should  be 
taken  of  the  extraordinary  effects  of  modem  warfare  upon  the  human  nervous  system, 
which  in  some  of  the  armies  in  France  were  responsible  for  20  per  cent  of  all  discharged 
for  disability.  Recent  progress  in  psychological  medicine  have  provided  us  with  new 
resources  for  the  understanding  of  human  behavior,  not  only  in  the  mentally  ill,  but 
in  "normal"  people  and  particularly  in  those  whose  conduct  differs  so  much  from  that 
approved  by  society  that  they  have  to  be  segregated. — Thomas  W.  Salmon,  Journal 
of  Criviinal  Law  and  Criminology,  November,  191 7.  O.  B.  Y. 

Social  Aspects  of  the  Family  Court. — The  Department  of  Commerce,  through  the 
Bureau  of  Census,  has  recently  published  a  report  on  marriage  and  divorce  for  the 
year  1916.  According  to  this  report  112,036  divorces  were  granted,  showing  an 
increase  of  55.5  per  cent  in  191 6  over  the  year  1906.  The  report  is  undoubtedly  free 
from  serious  errors,  but  in  the  aspect  of  affording  data  upon  which  Congress  may  act 
in  formulating  uniform  marriage  and  divorce  laws  it  is  misleading.  No  scientific 
inquiry  has  been  made  as  to  the  causes  of  divorce.  The  report  groups  the  causes  of 
divorce  under  a  few  broad  heads,  such  as  adulter^',  cruelty,  desertion,  drunkenness, 
neglect  to  provide,  combinations  of  the  preceding  causes,  etc.,  and  all  other  causes. 
It  is  evident  that  in  this  report  only  the  symptoms  of  family  dissensions  are  considered 
and  no  attempt  is  made  to  classify  basic  causes.  Nothing  is  revealed  as  to  the  social, 
psychological,  and  pathological  conditions  that  impelled  behavior  leading  to  divorce. 
The  report  shows  that  of  the  108,702  divorces  of  which  a  record  has  been  obtained, 
33,809  were  granted  to  the  husband  and  74,893  to  the  wife.  From  this  we  would  infer 
that  men  are  more  anti-social  in  their  marital  relations  than  women.  This  is  not  true 
in  fact.  Of  the  108,702  cases,  only  14,779  were  contested,  and  it  is  stated  that  in 
many  of  them  the  contest  did  not  go  beyond  the  filing  of  an  answer.  In  cases  in  which 
investigations  have  been  made,  it  has  been  found  that  in  at  least  75  per  cent  of  the 
cases  the  defendant  had  a  good  defense  and  that  the  plaintiff  had  no  more  valid 
grounds  for  divorce  than  the  defendant.  The  determination  of  men  and  women  to  be 
reheved  of  that  which  they  believe  to  be  intolerable  marital  conditions  places  a  pre- 
mium upon  fraud  and  perjury  and  encourages  cruelty,  neglect,  and  infidelity,  because 
they  lead  to  marital  liberation.  Has  the  sum  of  human  happiness  been  increased  or 
decreased  by  reason  of  these  112,036  divorces?  Is  it  possible  to  answer  this  question 
until  we  have  reliable,  exact,  scientific  information  as  to  the  causes  of  this  unfortunate 
social  condition? — Judge  Charles  W.Hoffman,  Journal  of  Criminal  Law  and  Crimi- 
nology, November,  1919.  O.  B.  Y. 

Plan  of  Safety  Instruction  in  Public  and  Parochial  Schools. — Safety  is  a  matter 
of  education  and  should  begin  in  the  schools.  Children  can  be  made  responsible  for 
conduct  of  the  school  community  hy  engaging  in  actual  safety  work.  The  procedure 
in  the  education  of  a  child  is  totally  different  from  what  it  is  in  the  education  of  an 
adult.  The  adult  can  interpret  l)are  precepts  on  the  basis  of  his  experience;  if  we 
would  educate  children  we  must  induct  them  into  the  experience.  There  are  three 
methods  of  safety  education:  I)y  working  it  into  various  branches  in  the  school  curric- 
ulum, by  having  children  construct  plays  or  pantomimes  illustrating  accident  situa- 
tions, and  by  organization  of  children  for  community  welfare.  Much  is  gained  by 
visits  of  delegations  of  children  to  coroners'  inquests  over  accident  cases,  by  the 
children's  inventing  problems  by  using  the  figures  in  census  reports,  by  making  draw- 
ings and  slogans,  and  by  reading  lessons  self-selected  from  current  periodicals. — Dr.  E. 
George  Payne.     Published  by  Xalional  Safety  Council.  R.  W.  N. 


RECENT  LITEILiTURE  261 

Some  Future  Issues  in  the  Sex  Problem. — The  orthodox  sex  morality  is  being 
gradually  discarded  and  a  new  tendency  of  loose  sex  relationship  is  coming  to  be  in 
vogue.  The  causes  of  this  change  are  diverse.  The  control  of  venereal  disease  as  the 
result  of  the  social  hj'giene  movement  has  removed  the  fear.  The  elimination  of  com- 
mercialized prostitution  constitutes  another  factor.  The  general  knowledge  of  birth 
control  did  away  with  the  stigma  of  illegitimate  mating.  The  MuUerschutz  propa- 
ganda involving  the  social  stigma  on  illegitimate  motherhood  and  childhood  has 
reduced  the  motive  for  abstinence  on  the  part  of  persons  not  married  to  one  another. 
The  growing  independence  of  women  from  any  need  of  marriage  on  economic  grounds 
tends  to  revolutionize  the  conventional  form  of  present  family  life.  The  prevalent 
Freudian  psychology  of  wish,  be  its  doctrines  true  or  false,  has  created  a  notion  among 
the  populace  that  the  "sex  urge"  if  suppressed  in  certain  ways  may  express  itself 
in  ways  injurious  to  the  individual  and  society.  The  combined  effect  of  all  these  factors 
appears  to  be  that  of  breaking  down  traditional  standards  by  the  elimination  of  the 
fear  of  results.  In  order  to  cope  with  the  situation  three  courses  seem  to  be  open: 
(i)  to  combat  the  tendency  by  the  force  of  moral  discipline;  {2)  to  acquiesce  in  the 
popular  verdict  as  inevitable;  or  (3)  to  guide  and  formulate  the  new  state  of  affairs 
into  a  code  of  "morals."  To  choose  the  first  is  to  assume  that  the  orthodox  moral 
code  is  perfect  and  final.  And  yet  an  examination  of  the  basis  of  such  morality  proves 
that  irrational  tradition  or  class  interest  plays  a  large  role.  To  resort  to  the  second 
policy  is  to  let  social  forces  drift  without  rational  control.  If  social  research  should 
definitely  foreshadow  the  partial  or  complete  abandonment  of  old  sanctions  of  sex 
conduct,  it  will  certainly  be  wiser  to  foresee,  formulate,  interpret,  and  thereby  recog- 
nize and  absorb  and  socialize  the  new  state  of  affairs  than  to  play  the  ostrich,  to 
acquiesce  supinely,  or  to  stand  across  the  path  of  the  inevitable  changes. — Thomas  D. 
Eliot,  International  Journal  of  Ethics,  April,  1920.  K.  S. 

Dem  Ziele  Nahe? — Recently  the  view  has  gained  ground  that  the  work  of  private 
organizations  formed  in  the  interests  of  illegitimate  children  and  their  mothers  has 
become  unnecessary  because  the  state  has  legally  made  some  concessions  to  illegitimate 
children  of  men  who  participated  in  the  war  and  to  the  mothers  of  the  former.  Mother- 
hood now  has  some  claim  to  protection  and  support  of  the  state.  It  is  intended  to 
provide  for  the  illegitimate  child  the  same  conditions  for  development  as  for  the 
legitimate.  The  unmarried  mother  has  a  right  to  claim  the  title  of  Frau  in  professional 
and  business  intercourse.  Plans  are  on  foot  to  establish  and  regulate  the  legal  and 
social  position  of  the  illegitimate  child  in  the  same  way.  Unfortunately,  the  con- 
ditions which  gave  rise  to  these  situations  still  exist  and  cannot  be  suddenly  altered  by 
legal  measures.  The  goal  is  still  far  off,  and  much  social  opposition  must  be  overcome 
before  it  is  reached.  Before  and  during  the  war  the  state  directed  its  attention  to 
these  children  as  a  matter  of  political  policy.  But  do  the  more  recent  measures  really 
touch  the  root  of  the  matter?  Are  they  destined  to  combat  the  double  standard  of 
morality,  the  disregard  for  and  desecration  of  motherhood,  the  lowering  of  the  sense  of 
responsibility  in  sexual  affairs?  These  measures  show  no  consideration  for  the  fact 
that  the  problems  of  illegitimacy  affect  not  only  marital  relations,  and  that  sexual 
morality  cannot  differ  for  the  legally  or  unlegally  married.  They  do  not  recognize 
the  weighty  social  injur>'  which  results  because  children  lack  homes  and  parents. 
They  treat  children  as  though  they  were  material  things  that  can  be  disposed  of  at 
will.  When  one  considers  that  it  is  one-tenth  of  the  whole  population  that  is  con- 
sidered inferior  on  account  of  the  accident  of  its  birth,  it  is  painful  to  contemplate  that 
in  the  past  women  and  mothers  have  been  excluded  from  participating  in  legislation 
which  primarily  concerns  motherhood.  It  is  a  matter  in  which  onlj'  woman  can 
add  new  valuations,  and  one  which,  from  the  standpoint  of  morality,  is  decisive  for 
the  nation. — Marie  Hiibner,  Die  Neue  Generation,  September,  1919.  L.  M.  S. 

Illegitimacy  as  a  Child-Welfare  Problem. — This  pamphlet,  of  slightly  more  than 
one  hundred  pages,  is  divided  into  three  parts  of  about  equal  size.  Part  I  is  chiefly 
a  statistical  study  under  the  title  "Extant  of  Problem."  Part  II  is  entitled  "The 
Child's  Status  and  Right  to  Support,"  and  Part  III  is  a  bibliography.     Legitimate 


262  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

and  illegitimate  live  births  per  i,ooo  married  women  fifteen  to  forty-nine  years  of 
age  and  per  i,ooo  single,  widowed,  and  divorced  women  of  the  same  ages,  are  as 
follows:  Austria,  1908-13,  213  and  30;  Hungary,  1906-15,  198  and  38;  German 
Empire,  1907-14,  196  and  23;  England  and  Wales,  1906-15,  171  and  7;  Ireland, 
1909-12,  250  and  4;  Scotland,  1906-15,  202  and  13;  Sweden,  1908-13,  196  and  26; 
The  Netherlands,  1905-14,  233  and  5.  Table  III  shows  the  average  annual  percentage 
of  illegitimate  births  in  a  group  of  European  cities  from  1905  to  1909.  The  percentage 
for  Amsterdam,  Belfast,  Birmingham,  Bristol,  Dublin,  London,  Manchester,  Rotter- 
dam, and  Sheffield  was  less  than  5.  For  Budapest,  Copenhagen,  Lyon,  Moscow, 
Munich,  Paris,  Petrograd,  Prague,  Stockholm,  and  Vienna  it  was  more  than  20.  Statis- 
tics for  the  United  States  are  given  for  the  year  191 5  for  sixteen  states  of  the  Union. 
Legitimate  live  births  for  1,000  females  fifteen  to  forty-four  years  of  age  range  from 
92.6  in  Nevada  to  213.5  ^^  Utah,  the  average  being  180.7.  Illegitimate  live  births  per 
1,000  females  range  from  1.8  in  South  Dakota  to  5.2  in  Pennsylvania,  the  average 
being  4.3.  Two  states  separate  the  figures  for  whites  and  negroes,  with  a  decidedly 
unfavorable  showing  for  the  latter.  Mortality  tables  show  that  the  death-rate  among 
illegitimate  children  far  exceeds  that  of  children  born  in  wedlock.  Until  comparatively 
recent  times  illegitimate  children  had  no  legal  rights  and  are  still  greatly  discriminated 
against.  The  highest  legal  standard  is  found  in  Norway,  where  a  child  born  out  of 
wedlock  has  the  same  right  of  inheritance  as  is  accorded  to  the  legitimate  child  and 
the  responsibility  for  maintenance  is  placed  upon  both  parents.  The  Minnesota 
law  of  19 1 7  is  the  nearest  American  approach  to  that  ideal.  Its  aim  is  to  see  that  the 
illegitimate  child  begins  life  under  the  least  possible  amount  of  handicap. —  U.S. 
Children's  Bureau,  No.  66.  S.  C.  R. 

"C  The  Recidivist  or  Habitual  Offender. —  One  of  the  most  difi&cult  problems  that 

confront  the  criminologist  is  recidivism,  how  it  should  be  dealt  with,  and  what  are 
its  causes.  The  increase  of  delinquencj'  is  due  to  the  wrong  methods  of  prison  life, 
the  failure  to  adjust  the  recidivist  to  the  environment  of  modern  civilization  with  its 
complex  laws  and  associations,  heredity,  and  the  decrease  of  restraining  influences. 
The  criminal  age  is  between  sixteen  and  twenty-five,  and  criminals  may  be  divided 
into  five  classes:  (i)  born  delinquents,  who  have  a  congenital  tendency  toward  crime. 
In  the  born  criminals  the  evolutionary  defect  is  developmental.  Under  favorable 
conditions  he  can  be  modified  or  educated  into  a  respectable  member  of  society; 
(2)  insane  delinquents;  (3)  delinquents  from  acquired  habit,  the  criminality  in  this 
case  being  derived  from  their  organization  and  social  conditions;  (4)  occasional 
delinquents;  (5)  passional  delinquents  with  a  mania  of  fixity  of  idea  and  exhibition 
of  a  defect  of  sensibility.  The  first  offense  of  the  young  delinquent  should  be  met  with 
a  warning  from  the  Bench,  the  second  with  a  short  term  of  imprisonment  from  the 
boys'  prison,  and  the  third  offense  should  consist  of  a  sentence  for  an  indefinite  period 
in  an  institution  similar  to  that  of  the  Borstal  Institution.  Every  case  should  receive 
special  treatment.  Good  nutrition,  satisfaction  of  the  real  requirements  of  life,  educa- 
tion, and  proportionate  labor  facilitate  the  maintenance  of  equilibrium  in  the  develop- 
ment of  the  brain  and  the  proper  adaptation  of  the  individual  to  his  environment. 
By  assimilation  of  the  good  and  dissimilation  of  the  bad  we  gradually  remove  the 
large  army  of  wasters  from  our  midst. — J.  E.  Marshall,  The  Nineteenth  Century  and 
After,  May,  1920.  C.  N. 

Criminal  Gynecology. — Gynecology  is  service  to  woman;  but  under  the  influence 
of  a  political  theory  of  expansion  by  force,  it  has  been  perverted  into  "service  for 
the  state  unfavorable  to  woman  and  her  private  interests."  Woman  has  been  dese- 
crated to  become  an  instrument  to  bear  children  for  the  state.  Even  before  the  war 
agitation  began  against  the  declining  birth-rate.  This  was  in  itself  a  crime  against 
the  nation,  because  it  was  a  campaign  waged  with  utter  disregard  of  the  principles 
of  eugenics.  Von  Winkcl  and  others  attemjited  a  veritable  police  control  over  married 
life.  Gynecology  became  militarized;  it  was  compelled  to  .serve  the  state  and  to 
serve  woman  only  in  so  far  as  militarism  permitted.  Ik-fore  the  war,  in  a  book  entitled 
Artzllches  Recht,  the  author  calls  attention  to  a  tendency  which  had  begun  to  prevail 
in  France,  namely,  the  principle  that  the  fetal  life  should  have  consideration  prior  to 
that  of  the  mother.     Under  the  pressure  of  war  psychosis,  this  attitude  has  crept  into 


RECENT  LITERATURE  263 

Germany.  It  depends  upon  woman  how  much  longer  it  is  to  prevail,  now  that 
millions  of  women  have  political  influence.  Although  no  country  has  such  carefully 
prescribed  laws  regulating  operations  as  Germany,  in  the  case  of  gynecology,  the 
attempt  is  made  to  suppress  the  principle  of  consent.  It  is  concealed  from  woman  that 
she  has  the  right  to  determine  the  time  and  method  of  operation  for  herself.  The 
military  system  is  to  blame  for  the  starvation  of  numerous  children,  their  under- 
nourishment and  all  its  accompanying  horrors  and  evils,  as  much  as  the  blockade. 
In  the  future,  Germany's  efforts  must  be  in  the  direction  of  creating  humane  condi- 
tions for  those  already  in  existence. — Dr.  J.  H.  Spinner,  Die  Neue  Generation,  October, 


1919. 


L.  M.  S. 


Americanization:  The  Other  Side  of  the  Case. — Several  state  legislatures  have 
already  passed  laws,  more  or  less  practical,  to  satisfy  this  hysterical  cry,  Americanize 
the  foreigners!  The  greatest  obstacles  to  the  speedy  Americanization  of  "foreigners" 
are  the  ridicule  of,  contempt  for,  and  prejudice  against  them  on  the  part  of  native 
Americans.  The  Czecho-Slovaks  in  the  hard-coal  regions  of  Pennsylvania  offer  a 
concrete  case  to  show  how  far  discrimination  is  carried  on  against  these  immigrants. 
He  is  very  seldom  called  by  his  name,  is  always  referred  to  as  "hunkie,"  or  "dago," 
or  the  like;  he  is  made  to  feel  that  he  is  despised,  that  he  is  a  stranger  and  unwelcome. 
The  methods  of  Americanization  can  be  divided  into  two  groups:  (i)  Educational 
means  combined  with  tolerance  and  kindness.  A  self-respecting  foreigner  hates  to 
be  made  a  public  spectacle,  to  be  exhibited  like  some  rare  bird  to  boost  the  standing 
of  some  professional  Americanizer,  so  that  his  salary  may  be  increased.  Teach 
the  American-born  children  to  treat  the  others  as  their  equals  to  remove  the  friction 
between  native-  and  alien-born  children.  (2)  The  legislative  program  forcing  the 
"foreigners"  to  learn  the  English  language  is  a  great  mistake.  Raise  the  bars  against 
immigrants  as  high  as  public  policy  demands,  be  stringent  in  granting  the  foreign- 
born  the  supreme  privilege  of  citizenship,  but  the  language  test  is  the  poorest  test 
that  could  be  thought  of.  It  is  just  as  futile  as  the  literacy  test  in  the  immigration 
legislation.  To  abolish  the  foreign-language  press  and  to  force  the  "foreigner"  to 
learn  the  English  language  only  impedes  natural  process  of  Americanization. — John 
Kulmer,  The  Atlantic  Monthly,  March,  1920.  C.  N. 

The  Larger  Function  of  State  University  Medical  Schools. — Within  recent  years 
there  has  come  about  a  changed  conception  in  regard  to  the  responsibility  of  the 
general  public  for  welfare  policies,  such  as  public  education,  public  improvements, 
standards  of  living,  and  health.  Within  the  last  century  we  have  seen  America 
develop  a  great  public  educational  system  in  which  the  state  has  undertaken  to  make 
provision  for  the  education  of  persons  of  types  of  ability  ranging  from  the  subnormal 
to  the  keenest  student  in  the  land.  Paralleling  this  development  in  education  has 
come  an  ever-increasing  conception  of  public  responsibility  for  the  care  of  certain 
defectives,  the  insane,  the  tuberculous,  and  others.  There  has  come  a  growing  con- 
sciousness of  the  importance  of  the  period  of  youth  and  it  is  but  a  step  farther  for  the 
state  to  interest  itself  in  the  health  of  the  children.  Not  only  the  states,  but  the 
federal  government  is  assuming  this  responsibility.  The  experience  in  Iowa  suggests 
that  this  t>pe  of  work  can  most  successfully  be  done  in  connection  with  the  college  of 
medicine.  The  conclusions  are  (i)  that  any  state  in  attempting  to  provide  this  type 
of  service  should  make  comprehensive  plans  on  the  material  side;  (2)  future  plans 
should  include  ample  provision  for  the  vigorous  prosecution  of  medical  research,  lest 
the  teaching  staff  be  overwhelmed  with  routine;  (3)  since  the  success  of  the  work  is 
absolutely  dependent  on  the  skill  and  devotion  of  the  staff,  it  is  essential  that  many 
adjustments  in  the  conditions  of  teaching  must  be  made. — Walter  A.  Jessup,  The 
Journal  of  the  American  Medical  Association,  April  17,  1920.  V.  M.  A. 

The  Obligations  of  Medicine  in  Relation  to  General  Education. — After  the  dissipa- 
tion of  life  incident  to  all  great  wars,  men  invariably  turn  to  the  importance  of  saving 
life  and  prolonging  it.  The  public  schools  must  become  the  health  centers  of  their 
communities.  J">ver>'  measure  carried  out  in  them  should  be  fully  explained  so  that 
the  wisdom  of  preventive  measures  shall  be  fully  appreciated  by  the  pupil,  making 
him  an  advocate  of  them  for  the  rest  of  his  life.     The  history  of  the  Public  Health 


264  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

Service  illustrates  how  the  government  has  been  able  to  promote  public  health  through 
acting  in  an  ancillary  capacity,  and  its  members  have  from  purely  medical  practice 
assumed  more  and  more  an  educational  function.  But  public  health  is  not  yet  of 
first  importance  with  the  government,  though  it  is  a  national  matter.  Shall  we  be 
content  to  rely  upon  the  public  spirit  of  liberal  and  enlightened  millionaires,  of  a 
Carnegie  or  Rockefeller,  to  do  for  us,  with  all  our  boasted  wealth  and  civilization, 
things  which  smaller  and  less  rich  nations  regard  as  essential  obligations  or  the  govern- 
ments they  maintain;  and  is  it  not  devitalizing,  corrupting,  enervating,  in  every  way 
demoralizing  influence  in  our  national  life  to  trust  for  essentials  of  national  happiness 
and  success  to  what  we  must  admit  are  accidental  agencies?  When  our  schools 
generally  come  to  view  the  premedical  standing  as  one  to  be  deeply  investigated  we 
shall  have  fewer  graduates,  perhaps,  but  a  relatively  larger  number  of  real  physicians. — 
W.  C.  Braisted,  The  Journal  of  the  American  Medical  Associalion,  May  i,  1920. 

V.  M.  A. 

Sociological  Aspects  of  Housing. — Housing  conditions  are  largely  determined  by 
family  income,  and  the  problem  is  the  same  whether  under  rural  or  urban  conditions. 
The  relation  of  housing  to  health  comprises  various  factors  influencing  the  physical, 
mental,  and  moral  development  of  the  family  and  family  life.  In  its  broadest  socio- 
logical aspect,  housing  is  a  determiner  of  personal,  family,  and  communal  health. 
To  secure  the  maximum  benefits  of  housing,  several  steps  are  necessary:  (i)  an  appreci- 
ation of  the  sociological  and  health  significance  of  hygienic  dwellings;  (2)  the  educa- 
tion of  the  public  as  to  the  natural  value  and  importance  of  sanitary  dwellings;  (3)  the 
rigid  enforcement  of  laws,  regulations,  and  ordinances  dealing  with  home  construction 
and  house  alterations;  (4)  the  promulgation  of  minimum  standards  of  housing  con- 
struction, of  maintenance  and  repair;  (5)  the  establishment  of  some  form  of  super- 
vision or  control  that  would  prevent  the  exploitation  of  tenants  through  profiteering 
rentals  and  unwillingness  to  make  necessary  repairs  required  in  the  interest  of  family 
health  and  safety;  (6)  the  determination  of  rules  and  regulations  for  proper  disinfec- 
tion and  fumigation  following  the  presence  of  contagious  diseases,  when  such  might 
prove  a  source  of  contagion  to  a  new  occupant;  (7)  the  encouragement  of  subsidized  or 
non-subsidized  programs  of  housing  construction  that  would  make  available  modern 
hygienic  dwelling-places  at  low  rentals;  (8)  the  support  by  health  departments  of 
those  measures  tending  to  increase  family  incomes  so  as  to  bring  about  a  minimum 
standard  of  living  wage,  consistent  with  the  cost  of  living,  in  a  manner  that  is  conducive 
to  health  and  comfort. — Ira  S.  Wile,  American  Journal  of  Public  Health,  April,  1920. 

C.  N. 

Standards  of  Living:  A  Complication  of  Budgetary  Studies. — A  great  many 
budgets  which  differ  widely  are  presented  to  the  reading  public.  They  might  be 
roughly  classed  as  follows:  A,  the  pauper  or  poverty  level,  usually  compiled  by  charity 
workers;  B,  the  minimum-of-subsistence  level,  which  ignores  the  social  well-being 
and  confines  itself  to  the  physical;  C,  the  minimum-of-comfort  level,  which  is  supposed 
to  recognize  both  physical  and  social  demands.  A  study  of  six  hundred  actual  family 
budgets  of  shipyard  workers  in  New  York  in  19 18  showed  the  average  expenditure  to 
be  $1,386.00  for  the  year.  The  minimum  budget  of  the  New  York  Factory  Com- 
mission in  1915  was  $876.00.  By  adding  the  increases  due  to  the  advance  in  prices  that 
same  budget  stood  on  June  i,  1918,  at  $1,356.00.  By  scientifically  determining  what  a 
family  should  have  the  budget  worked  out  (June,  1918)  at  $1,396.00.  A  proposed 
budget  of  level  above  minimum  subsistence  is  given  in  detail.  Its  total  is  $1,760.50. 
Cost  of  food  for  one  month  on  a  "minimum  to  maintain  health"  basis  was,  in  1907, 
$27.00,  and  in  1917,  $45.00.  A  budget  proposed  by  Seattle  and  Tacoma  Street 
Railway  employees  (1917)  was  $1,917.88,  The  Board  of  .Arbitration  dealing  with  the 
case  figured  their  budget  at  $1,505.00.  The  Philadelphia  Bureau  of  Municipal 
Research  issued  a  budget  in  December,  1917.  It  totaled  $1,200.00  and  the  Bureau 
said  that  "it  is  decidedly  the  minimum  on  which  a  family  can  e.xist."  The  cost  of  the 
navy  ration  for  enlisted  men  was,  in  1916,  37.06  cents  per  man  per  day;  in  1917, 
43.08  cents;  in  1918,  49.06  cents;  but  during  the  last  quarter  of  1918  jt  was  52  cents. 
A  table  of  Canadian  Budgets  is  given  based  on  average  prices  in  sixty  cities.  In  1900 
the  weekly  budget  was  $9.37;    in  May,  1919,  $21.98.     The  pamphlet  closes  with  a 


RECENT  LITERATURE  265 

discussion  of  various  items  entering  into  the  budgets  and  how  advanced  prices  have 
affected  the  use  of  the  various  commodities.  Many  poor  people,  forced  to  abstain  from 
certain  necessary  foods,  have  substituted  others  only  to  find  that  their  medicinal  bills 
were  heavier. — Bureau  of  Applied  Economics,  Washington,  1919.  S.  C.  R. 

The  Dispensary  Situation  in  New  York  City. — The  very  magnitude  of  the  dis- 
pensar>'  field  in  New  York  City  justifies  a  thorough  inquiry  into  the  numerous  medical, 
social,  and  economic  problems  which  it  raises.  There  are  in  Greater  New  York  65 
out-patient  departments  of  hospitals,  34  independent  dispensaries,  and  6  college 
dispensaries.  In  addition  the  Health  Department  maintains  21  tuberculosis  clinics, 
8  dental,  10  eye,  and  3  rabies  clinics,  and  the  Children's  Aid  Society  maintains  6  school 
dental  clinics,  making  a  total  of  153  licensed  dispensaries  in  New  York  City.  In  this 
list  are  not  included  the  3  occupational  clinics,  the  12  venereal  disease  clinics  of  the 
Health  Department,  and  60  baby  health  stations.  The  total  number  of  treatments 
given  at  the  153  dispensaries  for  which  statistics  are  available  exceeds  four  million 
annually.  It  is  recommended  that  a  uniform  maximum  fee  for  treatment  be  adopted; 
that  a  special  division  for  diagnosis  be  established;  that  phj^sicians  serving  should 
be  remunerated;  that  medical  records  should  be  more  adequate,  and  that  the  social 
service  department  should  be  extended.  The  opportunities  for  disease  prevention 
and  public  health  education  are  great.  People  applying  for  relief  to  the  dispensary  are 
more  in  the  mood  to  accept  and  follow  hygienic  advice  than  the  average  person  in 
good  health.  There  is  need  for  a  department  of  preventive  medicine  in  the  dispensary 
system. — E.  H.  Lewinsky-Corwyn,  Medical  Record,  January,  1920.  O.  B.  Y. 

Motion  Pictures  Not  Guilty. — The  National  Board  of  Review  has  been  concerned 
in  finding  an  answer  to  the  following  questions:  (i)  Are  motion  pictures  influencing 
young  people  to  an  appreciable  extent  toward  excesses  of  conduct  which  constitute  at 
present  a  menace  to  society?  (2)  Are  they  so  warping  their  moral  growth  as  to 
militate  against  development  into  normal,  useful  citizens?  With  the  co-operation  of 
the  American  Probation  Association  the  National  Board  in  July,  1919,  addressed  a 
letter  explaining  the  situation  to  the  chief  probation  ofl&cers  of  cities  throughout  the 
United  States  of  over  10,000  population,  having  juvenile  courts.  Forty-two  proba- 
tion officers  replied.  Of  these,  twenty-seven  set  forth  the  opinion  that  motion  pictures 
were  not  directly  responsible  for  juvenile  delinquency;  ten  replies  were  more  or  less 
noncommittal,  owing  to  lack  of  records  which  would  throw  light  on  this  subject;  five 
indicted  the  motion  picture  as  an  important  factor  in  the  commission  of  juvenile 
delinquencies.  Many  of  these  admitted  that  they  had  no  direct  evidence  and  that 
their  replies  merely  expressed  their  opinion.  The  Board  finds  that  in  many  cases 
where  it  is  established  that  the  motion  picture  is  a  factor  in  delinquency  it  is  not  the 
initial  cause.  More  frequently  its  suggestive  power  has  beneficial  results. — Report 
of  the  National  Board  of  Review  of  Motion  Pictures,  1920.  O.  B.  Y. 

Success  and  Failure  as  Conditions  of  Mental  Health. — The  essentials  of  physical 
health  are  the  most  common  things  of  daily  life — fresh  air,  good  food,  exercise,  sleep. 
One  of  the  simple  conditions  of  mental  health  is  success.  In  the  healthful  development 
of  the  child  and  in  the  efficient  activity  of  the  mature  individual,  this  and  to  a  limited 
extent  failure  also  are  health  conditions  of  fundamental  importance.  The  stimulus  of 
success  begins  with  the  baby  in  the  cradle  trying  to  free  himself  from  the  bands  that  fet- 
ter him,  and  the  psychology  of  success  is  the  same  for  the  baby  as  for  the  adult,  namely, 
the  matching  of  a  mental  image  with  reality.  Continued  success  develops  an  attitude 
of  confidence  but  continued  failure  is  liable  to  produce  an  unsocial  attitude,  a  shut-in 
personality,  which  may  lead  to  mental  disorder.  Our  school  system,  the  author 
claims,  completely  ignores  the  importance  of  these  two  factors  and  foreordains  many 
children  to  repeated  failure.  The  need  of  success  as  a  wholesome  stimulus  is  universal 
and  children  have  an  enormous  appetite  for  it.  The  diseased  are  often  cured  by  it. 
The  teacher's  business  should  be  to  see  that  all  children  achieve  some  successes  and 
that  sometimes  they  get  an  honest  gauge  of  themselves  by  failure.  The  physician 
and  the  social  worker  also  should  strive  to  find  opportunities  for  their  patients  to  do 
something  at  which  they  can  succeed,  for  of  such  simple  things  mental  hygiene  consists. 
— William  H.  Burnham,  Massachusetts  Society  for  Mental  Hygiene,  No.  37.     S.  C.  R. 


266  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

La  Reforme  penitentiaire  en  Chine. — The  movement  of  penal  reform  in  China 
commenced  at  the  same  time  as  did  judicial  reform.  That  is  to  say,  decrees  were 
issued  beginning  the  work  in  1906.  In  1909  work  was  begun  on  the  model  prison  of 
Pekin  and  the  following  year  an  edict  was  issued  to  establish  such  a  prison  in  each 
province.  Since  then  many  new  prisons  have  been  completed  or  are  now  under  way. 
First  of  all  as  to  penal  administration:  The  central  administration  is  in  the  hands  of 
the  ministry  of  justice,  having  at  its  head  a  director,  and  subdividing  into  three 
bureaus  charged  with  different  penal  questions.  Local  administration  is  vested  in 
the  attorney  general  of  the  court  of  appeal  of  each  province.  Other  officers  actually 
concerned  with  the  prison  operation  are  chosen  from  among  the  graduates  of  the 
special  penal  school.  The  prisons  are  built  on  the  model  of  Western  prisons,  either 
in  the  form  of  a  star  or  a  cross.  Their  capacity  varies  from  two  hundred  to  one  thou- 
sand prisoners.  Women,  youths  under  eighteen  years,  and  the  sick  occupy  separate 
quarters.  It  was  desired  to  build  an  institution  at  Pekin  for  young  offenders,  but 
lack  of  funds  has  prevented  the  realization  of  this  project.  The  cell  system  is  used 
in  the  prisons.  In  the  daytime  work  is  done  together  in  a  common  room,  but  at 
night  the  prisoners  are  returned  to  their  cells.  In  modern  Chinese  prisons  the 
reformatory  idea  prevails.  To  this  end  a  system  of  triple  education  is  given  to  the 
prisoners — moral,  intellectual,  and  physical.  Instruction  is  given  either  in  groups 
or  singly  as  the  case  may  require.  Classification  for  teaching  is  also  made  according 
to  age  and  the  nature  of  the  offense  for  which  the  person  was  imprisoned.  Work  is 
the  best  method  of  reform.  It  is  obligatory  on  all  except  the  sick.  The  articles  made 
by  the  prisoners  are  disposed  of  at  public  sales  which  take  the  nature  of  an  exhibition 
or  fair,  and  great  success  has  been  achieved  in  disposing  of  them.  The  money  received 
from  the  sales  goes  into  the  national  treasury,  although  a  small  amount  is  credited  to 
the  prisoners.  Many  of  them  have  acquired  a  liking  for  work,  and  in  some  cases  new 
trades  have  been  learned  which  will  permit  the  earning  of  an  honest  living  on  being 
released.  The  health  of  the  prisoners  is  maintained  by  a  strict  observance  of  the 
rules  of  hygiene.  Clothing  is  frequently  washed  and  regular  baths  are  required  of 
the  prisoners.  No  cruel  punishments  may  be  inflicted  for  infractions  of  discipline, 
but  a  curtailing  of  privileges  is  used,  as  well  as  the  knowledge  on  the  part  of  the  prisoner 
that  disobedience  will  injure  his  chances  for  pardon,  parole,  or  commutation  of  sen- 
tence. On  the  other  hand  added  privileges  are  the  reward  of  obedience.  Prisoners 
who  are  paroled  are  under  the  observation  of  the  local  police,  and  a  violation  of  the 
parole  results  in  being  sent  back  to  prison.  In  summarizing  we  may  say  that  penal 
reform  in  China  is  in  plain  view.  Those  who  have  occasion  to  visit  the  modern 
prisons  of  the  country  will  verify  the  statement  that  considerable  progress  has  been 
made  in  the  last  few  years. — Tsien  Tai,  Revue  penUcntiairc  ct  de  droit  penal,  July- 
October,  1919.  C.  V.  R. 

American  Experience  with  Workmen's  Compensation. — Experience  under  the 
American  compensation  statutes  has  justified  in  fair  measure  the  hopes  and  claims 
of  those  who  have  advocated  the  legislation.  It  has  not  been  millennial,  but  it  has 
realized  in  no  small  part  the  advantages  which  were  predicted.  The  speed  with 
which  the  system  was  adopted  in  Europe  has  even  been  surpassed  in  the  United 
States,  for  in  nine  years  compensation  statutes  were  enacted  in  forty-two  states, 
and  in  Alaska,  Porto  Rico,  and  Hawaii.  Before  the  introduction  of  the  system  many 
employees  and  employers  were  opposed  to  it.  The  laboring  classes  had  dangled 
before  their  eyes  the  occasional  large  awards  made  by  the  courts  in  case  of  injury, 
while  employers  feared  the  financial  burden  would  be  hard  to  bear.  Now,  after  a 
practical  test  with  the  system  at  work  in  a  great  diversity  of  industries,  both  employers 
and  workers  are  willing  to  indorse  it  heartily.  Investigations  have  shown  that  in 
many  cases  lump-sum  awards  were  used  to  purchase  homes  or  small  businesses, 
and  in  the  case  of  monthly  payments,  the  income  enabled  tiie  children  of  the  family 
to  continue  in  school  a  longer  time  than  would  otherwise  have  been  possible.  Two 
objections  raised  before  compensation  became  very  widespread  consisted  in  the 
assertions  that  malingering  would  result,  and  secondly,  that  since  the  state  paid  for 
accidents,  employers  would  be  less  careful  in  providing  safety  devices  on  machinery. 
The  very  opposite  has  been  the  case.  There  will  always  be  some  malingering  but  it 
has  not  been  found  to  be  an  appreciable  evil.     On  the  other  hand,  employers  have 


RECENT  LITERATURE  267 

taken  precautions  to  reduce  accidents,  for  it  gives  the  industry  a  lower  rate  when  the 
premiums  are  set  for  the  coming  year.  When  employers  "carry  their  own  risks," 
there  is  of  course  a  very  definite  incentive  for  keeping  the  accidents  down.  A  defect 
deserving  of  special  attention  is  the  inadequacy  of  the  schedule  of  awards.  Although 
injured  workmen  are  now  receiving  much  more  on  an  average  than  they  would  as  a 
result  of  a  suit  for  damages,  the  compensation  is  in  many  cases  less  than  one-half 
of  the  current  earnings.  Two-thirds  is  a  rate  given  in  some  states.  Another  greater 
defect  of  American  statutes  is  their  lack  of  comprehensiveness.  Mr.  Carl  Hookstadt 
estimated  that  in  the  so-called  compensation  states  there  were  not  less  than  7,400,000 
employees  who  were  not  covered  at  all  by  the  statutes.  A  million  and  a  quarter  are 
in  interstate  commerce,  and  many  of  the  remainder  are,  for  good  or  bad  reasons, 
classed  as  being  in  non-hazardous  occupations.  The  method  of  improvement  for 
the  future  will  therefore  need  to  provide  more  liberal  awards  and  the  inclusion  of  a 
greater  number  of  employees. — Willard  C.  Fisher,  The  American  Economic  Review, 
March,  1920.  C.  V.  R. 

Will  the  Wage  System  Last  ? — The  wage  theories  which  have  predominated  from 
the  beginning  of  the  Industrial  Revolution  down  to  the  present  are  four  in  number: 
(i)  the  so-called  "iron  law"  of  wages,  which  held  that  general  wages  tend  to  be  fixed 
at  the  minimum  point  necessary  to  enable  the  laborer  to  maintain  himself  and  rear 
a  family  to  supply  the  laborers  of  the  next  generation.  This  theory  fitted  in  well 
with  the  social  and  economic  conditions  of  the  early  nineteenth  century;  (2)  the 
"wage-fund"  theory  held  that  at  the  beginning  of  each  year  or  season  of  production 
the  employers  set  aside  a  portion  of  their  capital  to  be  paid  as  wages  during  the  ensuing 
period;  (3)  the  "productivity"  theory  maintained  that  wages  are  the  return  to  labor 
of  that  part  of  the  product  which  is  actually  created.  This  was  acceptable  to  the 
capitalist  because  it  gave  the  laborer  to  understand  that  he  was  getting  all  he  deserved; 
(4)  the  "bargain"  theory  took  something  from  each  of  the  others.  The  modern 
industrial  unrest  signalizes  labor's  eventual  acceptance  of  the  bargain  theory  and 
simultaneously  registers  a  protest  which  takes  two  forms:  (i)  labor  accepts  the 
bargain  theory  unreservedly  and  proposes  to  carry  it  to  its  logical  application;  (2)  labor 
believes  there  can  be  no  satisfactory  economic  conditions  as  long  as  one  class  of  pro- 
ducers is  paid  by  another  class  of  producers,  i.e.,  as  long  as  the  relation  of  master  and 
servant  persists  in  the  economic  field.  To  solve  the  problem  entirely,  a  new  system 
of  relationship  between  labor  and  capital  must  be  established,  i.e.,  labor  must  share 
with  capital  in  both  the  control  of  production  and  the  ownership  of  the  product. — 
Henry  Pratt  Fairchild,  The  Unpartizan  Review,  July-September,  1920.  C.  N. 

Un  Aspect  de  la  lot  du  24  Octobre  1919  sur  la  protection  des  femmes  allai- 
tant  leur  enfant. — One  law  of  the  last  legislature  should  not  be  passed  by  without 
notice;  it  is  that  of  October  24,  1919,  on  the  protection  of  women  who  are  nursing  their 
children.  It  presents  a  two-fold  interest.  First  to  encourage  mothers,  now  becoming 
more  and  more  rare,  who  still  remember  that  the  mother's  milk  is  the  best  nourishment 
for  the  child.  A  general  interest  follows:  that  of  putting  into  the  hands  of  vigilant 
administrators  a  simple  and  practical  means  of  bringing  about  the  realization  of  a 
reform  in  our  methods  of  aid  which  consists  of  creating  in  each  commune  a  liaison 
organ  between  public  and  private  charity.  It  is  from  this  last  and  larger  aspect  that 
we  will  examine  it  here.  It  is  an  incontestable  fact  that  the  new  law  will  give  results 
only  where  the  control  of  the  nursing  and  the  observance  of  the  hygienic  prescriptions 
will  be  strictly  assured.  To  give  the  physicians  exclusive  charge  would  be  too  burden- 
some, and  all  that  remains  is  to  ask  for  friendly  aid,  preferably  of  women.  This  aid 
virtually  exists,  being  provided  for  by  two  former  laws.  The  eight  weeks  period  of 
aid  is  too  short  to  e.xcite  more  than  a  passing  interest,  but  the  new  law,  in  extending 
assistance  to  the  mother  until  the  twelfth  month,  will  permit  a  much  longer  contact 
with  the  visiting  nurse.  If  the  law  is  properly  administered  it  will  result  in  saving 
many  precious  lives  and  will  secure  more  births  in  the  future.  This  law  is  in  fact  the 
culmination  of  the  decree  of  February  28,  1919,  which  established  co-ordination 
between  public  and  private  assistance.  The  administration  of  the  law  is  placed  in 
the  hands  of  a  commission  of  eight  members  representing  both  sexes. — F.  Lebaulanger, 
Revue  Philanlhro pique,  March  15,  1920.  C.  V.  R. 


268 


THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 


BIBLIOGRAPHY 


BOOKS 


Bonjour,  Felix.  Real  Democracy  in 
Operation;  the  Example  of  Switzer- 
land. New  York:  Stokes.  Pp.  viii-j- 
226.     $1.50. 

Boucke,  Oswald  Fred.  The  Limits  of 
Socialism.  New  York:  Macmillan. 
Pp.259.     $1.50. 

Brissenden,  Paul  Frederick.  The 
I.W.W.;  a  Study  of  American  Syn- 
dicalism. 2d  ed.  (Studies  in  history, 
economics,  and  public  law.  Vol. 
LXXXIII).  New  York:  Longmans. 
Pp.    438.     (41     pages    bibl.)     $4.00. 

Brooks,  John  Graham.  Labor's  Chal- 
lenge to  the  Social  Order;  Democracy 
Its  Own  Critic  and  Educator.  New 
York:    Macmillan.     Pp.  441.     $2.75. 

Bryas,  Madeleine  de,  comtesse,  and 
Bryas,  Jacqueline  de.  A  French- 
woman's Impressions  of  America. 
New  York:  Century  Co.  Pp.  xiv-f- 
268.     $1.75. 

Coffin,  Henry  Sloane.  A  More  Christian 
Industrial  Order.  New  York:  Mac- 
millan.    Pp.  86.     $1.00. 

Cooke,  Richard  Joseph,  Bp.  The  Church 
and  World  Peace.  New  York  and 
Cincinnati:  Abingdon  Press.  Pp. 
178.     $1.00. 

Cope,  Henry  Frederick.  Education  for 
Democracy.  New  York:  Macmillan. 
Pp.  275.     $2.00. 

Crowther,  Samuel.  Why  Men  Strike. 
Garden  City,  New  York:  Doubleday, 
Page.     Pp.  viii-1-232.     $1.75. 

Dawson,  Edgar.  Organized  Self-govern- 
ment. New  York:  Holt.  Pp.  xxiv-f- 
383.     $1.40. 

Dickson,  Mrs.  Marguerite  Stockman. 
Vocational  Guidance  for  Girls.  Chi- 
cago: Rand,  McNally.  Pp.  ix-l-246. 
$1.25. 

Elmer,  Manuel  Conrad.  Technique  of 
Social  Survej's.  Rev.  ed.  Minne- 
apolis: University  Printing  Co.  Pp. 
117-     $1-25. 

Erskine,  John.  Democracy  and  Ideals; 
a  Definition.  New  York:  Doran. 
Pp.  152.     $1.50. 

Feldman,  William  Moses.  The  Prin- 
ciples of  Ante-natal  and  Post-natal 
Child  Physiology,  Pure  and  Applied. 
New  York:  Longmans.  Pp.  xxvii-f 
694.     $10.50. 


Fielding,  WiUiam  J.  Sanity  in  Sex. 
New  York:  Dodd,  Mead.  Pp.  xvi-(- 
133.     (17  pages  bibl.)     $1.75. 

Findlay,  Joseph  John.  An  Introduction 
to  Sociology;  for  Social  Workers  and 
General  Readers.  (Publications  of 
the  University  of  Manchester.)  New 
York:  Longmans.    Pp.  xi-l-304.  $2.00. 

Folks,  Homer.  The  Human  Costs  of 
War.  Illustrated  with  photographs 
by  Lewis  W.  Hine.  New  York: 
Harper.     Pp.325.     $2.25. 

Gallichan,  Catherine  Gasquoine  Hartley' 
(Mrs.  Walter  M.  Gallichan).  Wo- 
men's Wild  Oats;  essays  on  the  re- 
fixing  of  moral  standards.  New  York: 
Stokes.     Pp.238.     $1.50. 

Gibson,  Thomas.  The  Problems  of 
Peace.  New  York:  Financial  World, 
29  Broadway.     Pp.  146.     $1.00. 

Gleason,  Arthur  Huntington.  What  the 
Workers  Want;  a  Study  of  British 
Labor.  New  York:  Harcourt,  B.  &  H. 
Pp.  vii+518.     $4.00. 

Harper,  William  Allen.  Reconstructing 
the  Church.  New  York  and  Chicago: 
Revell.     Pp.  188.     $1.25. 

Haskins,  Charles  Homer,  and  Lord, 
Robert  Howard.  Some  Problems  of 
the  Peace  Conference.  Cambridge, 
Mass.:  Harvard  University  Press. 
Pp.  310.     $3.00. 

Hill,  David  Jayne.  American  World 
Politics.  New  York:  Doran.  Pp. 
257.     $3.50. 

Hobson,  S.  G.  National  Guilds  and 
the  State.  New  York:  Macmillan. 
Pp.  xix-t-406.     $4.00. 

Holt,  Arthur  E.  The  Bible  as  a  Com- 
munity Book.  New  York:  Woman's 
Press.     $1.35. 

Hrbkova,  Sdrka  B.  Czechoslovak  Sto- 
ries. Translated  from  the  original. 
(Interpreters'  Series.)  New  York: 
Dufheld.     Pp.  iv-l-330.     $1.90. 

Husband,  Joseph.  Americans  by  Adop- 
tion; Brief  Biographies  of  Great 
Citizens  Born  in  Foreign  Lands. 
With  an  introduction  by  William 
Allen  Neilson.  Boston:  Atlantic 
Monthly  Press.     Pp.  xv-|-i53-     $1.50. 

Johnston,  Donald  Kent.  Religious  As- 
pects of  Scientific  Healing.  A  psycho- 
analytic guide  written  from  the 
patient's    point    of    view.     With    an 


RECENT  LITERATURE 


269 


introduction  by  Elwood  Worcester. 
(Studies  in  Psychology.)  Boston: 
Badger.     Pp.94.     $1.75. 

Jones,  Henry  Arthur.  Patriotism  and 
Popular  Education.  New  York:  But- 
ton.    Pp.  x.xviii-f-314.     $4.00. 

Kellogg,  Vernon  Lyman.  Herbert  Hoo- 
ver, the  Man  and  His  Work.  New 
York:  Appleton.     Pp.     viii-l-375. 

$2.00. 

Klein,  Philip.  Prison  Methods  in  New 
York  State.  A  contribution  to  the 
study  of  the  theory  and  practice  of 
correctional  institutions  in  New  York 
State.  (Studies  in  History,  Eco- 
nomics, and  Public  Law,  Vol.  XL, 
No.  I.)  New  York:  Longmans.  Pp. 
420.     $3 . 50. 

Koos,  Leonard  Vincent.  The  Junior 
High  School.  With  an  introduction 
by  Henry  Suzzallo.  New  York:  Har- 
court,  B.  &  H.     Pp.  xv-l-79.     $1.36. 

Lewis,  James  C,  Jr.  Teaching  in  the 
Army.  Chicago:  Univ.  of  Chicago 
Press.     Pp.64.     Paper,  $0.50. 

Lockey,  Joseph  Byrne.  Pan-American- 
ism: its  Beginnings.  New  York: 
Macmillan.  Pp.  503.  (7  pages  bibl.) 
$5.00. 

Low,  Barbara.  Psycho-analysis.  A 
brief  account  of  the  Freudian  theory. 
Introduction  by  Ernest  Jones.  New 
York:  Harcourt,  B.  &  H.  Pp.  199. 
Si .60. 

Mansbridge,  Albert.  An  adventure  in 
Working-class  Education;  Being  the 
Story  of  the  Workers'  Educational 
Association,  1903-15.  New  York: 
Longmans.     Pp.  xx-l-73.     $2.00. 

McBride,  Isaac.  "Barbarous  Soviet 
Russia."  New  York:  T.  Seltzer. 
Pp.  276.     $2.50. 

Meriam,  Junius  Lathrop.  Child  life 
and  the  Curriculum.  Yonkers-on- 
Hudson,  N.Y.:  World  Book  Co. 
Pp.  xii-l-538.     (14  pages  bibl.)     $3.60. 

Miliukov,  Pavel  Nikolaevitch.  Bolshe- 
vism: an  International  Danger.  Its 
doctrine  and  its  practice  through  war 
and  revolution.  New  York:  Scribner. 
Pp.303.     $3.75- 

Payne,  George  Henr>'.  History  of  Jour- 
nalism in  the  United  States.  New 
York:  Appleton.  Pp.  xx-t-453.  (28 
pages  bibl.)     $2  .50. 

Queen,  Stuart  Alfred.  The  Passing  of 
the  County  Jail.  Individualization 
of  misdemeanants  through  a  unified 
correctional  system.  Menasha,  Wis.: 
G.  Banta  Pub.     Pp.  xiii-l-156.    $1.50. 


Raymond,  George  Lansing.  Ethics  and 
Natural  Law.  A  reconstructive  review 
of  moral  philosophy  applied  to  the 
rational  art  of  living.  New  York: 
Putnam.     Pp.  xxxiii-l-345.     $2.00. 

Roberts,  Richard.  The  Unfinished  Pro- 
gramme of  Democracy.  New  York: 
Huebsch.     Pp.326.     $2.00. 

Rosanoff,  Aaron  Joshua.  Manual  of 
Psychiatry.  5th  rev.  ed.  New  York: 
Wiley.     Pp.  xv-t-684.     $4.00. 

Ross,  Edward  Alsworth.  The  Prin- 
ciples of  Sociolog>'.  (Social  Science 
Series).  New  York:  Century  Co. 
Pp.  700.     $4.00. 

Russell,  Charles  Edward.  The  Story 
of  the  Nonpartisan  League;  a  Chapter 
in  American  Evolution.  New  York: 
Harper.     Pp.332.     $2.00. 

Scott,  Emmett  Jay.  Negro  Migration 
During  the  War.  (Preliminary  Eco- 
nomic Studies  of  the  War,  16.)  New 
York:  Oxford  Univ.  Pp.  v+189. 
(8  pages  bibl.)     $1 .00. 

Sechrist,  Frank  Kleinfelter.  Education 
and  the  General  Welfare.  A  text- 
book of  school  law,  hygiene,  and 
management.  New  York:  Macmillan 
Pp.  xx+443.     (14  pages  bibl.)     $1.60. 

Seligman,  Herbert  J.  The  Negro  Faces 
America.  New  York:  Harper.  Pp. 
318.     $1.75- 

Simon,  Leon.  Studies  in  Jewish  Nation- 
alism. With  an  introduction  by  Al- 
fred E.  Zimmern.  New  York:  Long- 
mans.    Pp.  xi-(-i74.     $2.40. 

Spalding,  Henry  Stanislaus.  Talks  to 
Nurses;  the  Ethics  of  Nursing. 
New  York:  Benziger.  Pp.  197. 
$1.50. 

Steiner,  Rudolph.  The  Triorganic  Social 
Organism.  An  exposition  of  the  em- 
brj'onal  points  of  the  social  question 
in  the  life-necessities  of  the  present 
and  the  future.  Detroit,  Mich.: 
Goetheanum  Press  of  America,  46 
Hendrill  St.     Pp.135.     $i-5o- 

Talbot,  Winthrop,  and  Johnsen,  Julia  E. 
Americanization.  Principles  of  Ameri- 
canism; essentials  of  Americaniza- 
tion; technic  of  race-assimilation; 
annotated  bibliography.  2d  rev.  ed. 
(Handbook  series.)  New  York:  H. 
W.  Wilson  Co.  L\iv-|-373.  (53  pages 
bibl.)     $1.80. 

Thomas,  William  Isaac,  and  Znaniecki, 
Florian.  The  Polish  Peasant  in 
Europe  and  America.  Vol.  IV.  Bos- 
ton:  Badger.     $5.00. 


270 


THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 


Veiller,  Lawrence  Turnure.  A  Model 
Housing  Law.  Rev.  ed.  (Russell 
Sage  Foundation  Publications.)  New 
York:  Russell  Sage  Foundation.  Pp. 
xiv+430.     $4,00. 

Vestal,  Samuel  C.  The  Maintenance  of 
Peace;  or,  The  Foundation  of  Do- 
mestic and  International  Peace  as 
Deduced  from  a  Study  of  the  History 
of  Nations.  New  York:  Putnam. 
Pp.  ix+s84.     $5.00. 

Voinovitch,  Louis,  Count.  Dalmatia 
and  the  Jugo-slav  movement.  With  a 
preface  by  Sir  Arthur  Evans.  New 
York:   Scribner.     $3.00. 

Warren,  Howard  Crosby.  Human  Psy- 
chology. Boston:  Houghton  Mifflin. 
Pp.  xx+460.     $5.00. 


Watkins,  Oscar  Daniel.  A  History  of 
Penance;  Being  a  Study  of  the 
Authorities.  Vol.  I,  The  whole  church 
to  A.D.  450;  Vol.  n,  The  Western 
church  from  a.d.  450  to  a.d.  1215. 
New  York:  Longmans.  2  Vols.  Pp. 
xxix-}-xix+775.     $16.00. 

Webb,  Jesse  P.  The  American  Prison 
System.  Salem,  Ore.:  J.  P.  Webb, 
Route  6.     Pp.262.     S2.00. 

Willis,  George.  The  Philosophy  of  Speech. 
New  York :  Macmillan.  Pp.256.  $2.50. 

Zwemer,  Rev.  Samuel  Marinus.  The 
Influence  of  Animism  on  Islam.  An 
account  of  popular  superstitions.  (A. 
C.  Thompson  Lectures  for  1918-19.) 
New  York:  Macmillan.  Pp.  viii+ 
246.     $2.00. 


ARTICLES 


Allix,  Edgard.  Contre  le  prelevement  sur 
le  capital.  Rev.  pol.  et  parlem.  103: 
145^63,  May  10,  '20. 

Andrews,  B.  R.  Thrift  as  a  Family  and 
Individual  Problems — Some  Standard 
Budgets.  Ann.  Am.  Acad.  Pol.  Soc. 
Sci.  87:11-20,  Jan.  '20. 

Appel,  Paul.  La  Societe  des  Nations  et 
I'avenir  de  I'humanite.  Rev.  pol.  et 
parlem.     103:90-92,  Apr.  10,  '20. 

Barnbrock,  Henry.  One  Community 
Council:  Its  Vision  and  Its  Accom- 
plishments. Life  and  Labor.  10: 
168-71,  June, '20. 

Barnes,  H.  E.  Durkheim's  Contribu- 
tion to  the  Reconstruction  of  Political 
Theory.  Pol.  Sci.  Quar.  35:236-54, 
June  '20. 

Beloit,  G.  Conscience  et  fonction  so- 
ciale.  Revue  de  m^taphysique  et  de 
morale  27:127-150,  April-June  '20. 

Beyer,  Arthur.  Die  gegenwartige  Lage 
der  deutschen  Eisenindustrie,  Die 
Neue  Zeit,  38:169-72,  May  21,  '20. 

Boucheron,  Louis.  Les  Cooperatives  et 
la  reconstitution  des  regions  d^vastees. 
Rev.  pol.  et  parlem.  102:422-30,  Mar. 
10,  '20. 

Bovensiepen  Dr.  jur.  u.  phil.  Die 
Einrede  der  mehreren  Beischlafer,  die 
Exceptio  plurium  concumbentium. 
Zeitschrift  fiir  Sexualwissenschaft  7: 
10-17,  Apr.  '20. 

Bridge,  J.  H.  Work  and  Play  with  Her- 
bert Spencer.  Unpar.  14:1-13,  July- 
Sept.  '20. 

Brown,  P.  M.  Jewish  Nationalism. 
Amer.  Jour.  Int.  Law  13:755-59, 
Oct.  '19. 


Brownlee,  Fred.  L.  Church  School  and 
Public  Opinion.  Rel.  Educa.  15:137- 
43,  June  '20. 

Clapp,  Edwin  C.  A  New  York  Experi- 
ment in  Business  Cooperation.  Am. 
Econ.  Rev.  10:48-58,  Mar.  '20. 

Cohn,  Fannia  M.  The  Workers'  Uni- 
versity of  the  International  Ladies' 
Garment  Workers'  Union.  Life  and 
Labor  10:73-77,  Mar.  '20. 

Corcoran,  Madge.  Public  Health  Nurses 
Organized  for  Protection.  Life  and 
Labor  10:149-52,  May  '20. 

Darlu,  A.  La  France  et  la  Vatican. 
Rev.  pol.  et  parlem.  103:164-69,  May 
10,  '20. 

.     Pour  la  paix  sociale.     Rev.  pol. 

et  parlem.  103:5-11,  Apr.  10,  '20. 

Dawson,  H.  C.  The  Passing  of  Industrial- 
ism.    Sociol.  Rev.  12:6-17,  Spring  '20. 

Day,  Cline.  Keynes'  Economic  Conse- 
quences of  Peace.  Am.  Econ.  Rev. 
10:299-312,  June  '20. 

Delmer,  A.  Le  Salaire  minimum  dans 
les  mines  de  houille  britanniques. 
Rev.  du  Travail  21:626-41,  May  15, 
'20. 

des  Rotours,  le  baron  J.  Angot.  Le 
Mouement  ^conomique  et  social — 
Pays   de  langue   anglaise.     Ref.    Soc. 

9:331-35.  M^y  '-'o- 

Doeblin,  M.  I.  Juvenile  Delinquency. 
Sch.  and  Society  11:725-32,  June  '20. 

Doll,  E.  A.  A  Study  of  Multiple  Crimi- 
nal Factors.  Jour.  Crim.  Law  and 
Crim.  11:33-46,  May  '20. 

.     Improper  Use  of  the  Intelligence 

Quotient.  Jour.  Dclinq.  5 :  67-70,  May 
'20. 


RECENT  LITERATURE 


271 


Drury,  Horace  B.     Labor  and  Produc- 
tion.    Am.    Federationist    27:237-44, 

Mar.  '20. 
Duboscq,     Andr6.     La     Chine     et     la 

question    d'     extreme — Orient.     Rev. 

pol.  et  parlem.  103:  79-89,  Apr.  10,  '20. 
Diick,  Prof,  in  Innsbruck.     AnonjTnitat 

u.   Sexualitat.     Zeitschrift  fur  Se.xual- 

wissenschaft  7:49-59,  May  '20. 
Dupont,     General.     Une     Mission     en 

Allemagne. — Le      Repatriement      des 

prisonniers.     Rev.  de  deux  mon.  57: 

144-66,  May  I,  '20. 
Ellwood,  Charles  A.     The  Formation  of 

Public  Opinion.     Rel.  Educa.   15:73- 

80,  April,  '20. 
Emmet,     Boris.      Duration     of     Wage 

Earners'  Disabilities.     Mo.  Lab.  Rev. 

10:4-15,  Mar.  '20. 
Engelbrecht,   Polizeirat,   Leipzig.     Tele- 

pathie  und  Kriminalpolizei.     Deutsche 

Strafrechtszeitung    6:301-305,    Sept.- 

Oct.  '19. 
Fairchild,  H.  P.     Will  the  Wage  System 

Last?     Unpar.    14:14-32,    July-Sept. 

'20. 
Fisher,  Willard  C.     ^\merican  Experience 

with  Workmen's  Compensation.     Am. 

Econ.  Rev.  10:18-47,  Mar.  '20. 
Foignet,  Rene.     La  Faculte   de  droit  et 

des  sciences  sociales  de  Buenos-Aires. 

Rev.  pol.  et  parlem.  103:243-53,  May 

10,  '20. 
Galant,  Dr.  S.     Das  Sexual  problem  im 

Lichte  eines  Marchens.     Zeitschrift  fiir 

Sexualwissenschaft    7:22-4,    Apr.  '20. 
Gerson,  Adolf.     Die  Menstruation,  ihre 

Entstehung     und     Bedeutung.      Zeit- 
schrift fiir  Sexualwissenschaft  7:18-21, 

Apr.  '20. 
Godfrey,    Hollis.     Cooperation   between 

Industry   and    the    Colleges.     Educa. 

Rev.  60:42-51,  June  '20. 
Gompers,      Samuel.      Labor's      Protest 

Against    a    Rampant    Tragedy.     Am. 

Federationist  27:521-32,  June  '20. 
.     The  Issues  That  Face  America. 

.\m.  Federationist  27:422-34,  May  '20. 
Guerlac,  Othon.     Une  Attaque  Anglaise 

Contre  la  Paix  de  Versailles.     La  paix 

par  le  droit  138-46,  May  '20. 
Guske,  W.     Demokratisierung  der  Ver- 

waltung.     Die   Neue  Zeit  38:221-28, 

June  4,  '20. 
Haldane,    O.    M.     The    Nature    of    the 

State.     Contemp.    Rev.    117:761-73, 

June  '20. 
Hamelle,    Paul.     L'lrelande    enchainee. 

Rev.  pol.  et  parlem.  102:402-21,  Mar. 
10,  '20. 


Harduin.  Questions  penitentiares  et 
p6nales.  Rev.  pen.  droit  p6nal  195- 
202,  July-Oct.  '19. 

Harley,  H.  Detroit  Reforms  Its  Crimi- 
nal Courts.  Nat.  Nun.  Rev.  9:345- 
48,  June  '20. 

Harris,  Henry  J.  The  British  National 
Health  Insurance  System,  1911-1919 
Mo.  Lab.  Rev.  10:45-59,  J^^n.  '20. 

Hayes,  Edward  C.  The  Future  of  War. 
Jap.  Rev.  4:230-32,  June  '20. 

Hill,  D.  J.  Present  Economic  and  Social 
Problems.  Sci.  Mo.  10:581-88,  June 
'20. 

Holmes,  Edmond.  The  Psychology  of 
Sanity.    Hib.  Jour.  18:509-18,  Apr. '20. 

Huebner,  S.  S.  Life  Insurance  in  Its 
Relation  to  Thrift.  Ann.  Am.  Acad. 
Pol.  Soc.  Sci.  87:183-89,  Jan.  '20. 

Kent,  Fred  I.  Europe's  War  Problems 
and  Labor.  Econ.  Wld.  106:4-7, 
July  3,  '20. 

Jaures,  Jean.  La  Paix  et  le  socialisme 
de  I'humanite.  La  paix  par  le  droit 
30:83-86,  Mar.-Apr.  '20. 

Kern,  Dr.  Miinchen.  Der  Einflusz  der 
politischen  Umwalzung  auf  das  Straf- 
gesetzbuch.  Deutsche  Strafrechts- 
Zeitung  6:339-45,  Nov.-Dec,  '19. 

Kline,  Burton.  Employee  Representa- 
tion in  Standard  Oil.  Indus.  Manag. 
59:355-60,  496-501,  May-June  '2o._ 

Kramer,  Dr.  August.  Der  Dimorphis- 
mus  bei  Mann  u.  Frau.  Zeitschrift  fiir 
Sexualwissenschaft,    7:1-9,    Apr.   '20. 

Laache,  S.  Om  Geniet  som  Biologisk 
Problem.  Samtiden  15:264-84,  June 
'20. 

Laborde-Lacoste,  M.  Les  theories  gen- 
erales  du  droit  penal  dans  le  projet  du 
code  peruvien.  Rev.  pen.  droit  penal 
247-55,  July-Oct.  '19. 

Lalo,  Charles.  Les  fonctions  sociales  de 
la  mode.  Rev.  Phil.  89:385-401, 
May-June  '20. 

Lamaude,  Ferdinand.  La  Fonction 
sociale  des  facultes  de  droit.  Rev. 
pol.  et  parlem.  102:398-401,  Mar.  10, 
'20. 

Larrabee,  Harold  A.  The  Formation  of 
Public  Opinion  through  Motion  Pic- 
tures. Rel.  Educa.  15:144-54,  June 
'20. 

Laufkotter,  Franz.  Die  Unzufrieden- 
heit  als  Massenerscheinung.  Die  Neue 
Zeit  38: 199-205,  May  28  '20. 

Lebaulanger,  F.  Un  Aspect  de  la  loi  du 
24  Octobre  191 9  sur  la  protection  des 
Femmes  allaitant  leur  Enfant.  Rev. 
philan.  41:89-94,  Mar.  15,  '20. 


272 


THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 


Levy,   fidouard.'    L'Etat  civil  et  la  na- 
tionality.    Rev.  pol.  et  parlem.   103: 

108-15,  Apr.  10  '20. 
L6vy,  Raphael-Georges.     La  Juste  paix. 

Rev.  de  deux  mon.  57:286-311,  601- 

29,  May  15 — June  i,  '20. 
Leyst,     Carl     von.     Die     ungehemmte 

Wechselneigung  als  Instinkt  und  Wille 

zur  biologischen  Synthese.     Die  Neue 

Generation  15:413-26,  Sept.  'ig. 
Loisy,   Alfred.     La   Socicte  des  nations 

et    la    religion    de    1'   humanite.      La 

Paix  par    le    droit    30:82-83,    Mar.- 

Apr.  '20. 
Lutz,  Harley  L.     The  Progress  of  State 

Income    Taxation    Since    191 1.     Am. 

Econ.  Rev.  10:66-91,  Mar.  '20. 
Magnusson,  Leifer.     Company  Housing 

in  Anthracite  Region  of  Pennsylvania. 

Mo.  Lab.  Rev.  10:186-95,  May  '20. 
Meissel-Hesz,     Grete.         Die     Heirats- 

wunsche     der     Postbeamtinnen.     Die 

Neue  Generation  16:11-12,  Jan.  '20. 
Meyer,    E.    C.     Community    Medicine 

and  Public  Health.     Amer.  Jour.  Pub. 

Health  10:489-97,  June  '20. 
Michels,     Roberto.     La     Sociologie     de 

Venise     dans     I'Apres-guerre.      Rev. 

Inter,  de  Soc.  124-30,  Mar.-Apr.  '20. 
Moll,     Dr.     Berlin.      Die     Psychologie 

im     Dienste     des     Fahndungswesens. 

Deutsche    Strafrechts-Zeitung    7:160- 

63,  May- June  '20. 
Parker,   Florence   E.     The   Cooperative 

Movement  in  the  United  States.     Mo. 

Lab.  Rev.  10:138-45,  Mar.  '20. 
Patten,   S.   N.     Back  Sliding  on  Social 

Work.     Survey  44:338-43,  June   '20. 
Pearl,  R.     The  Efifect  of  the  War  on  the 

Chief  Factors  of  Population  Change. 

Science  51:553-56,  June  '20. 
Plehn,  Carl  C.     War  Profits  and  E.xcess 

Profits  Taxes.     Am.  Econ.  Rev.   10: 

283-98,  June  '20. 
Price,  G.  V.     The  Sociological  Basis  of 

Education.     Educa.  40:591-600,  June 

'20. 
Ratcliffe,    S.     K.     America's    Troubled 

Hpur.     Contemp.    Rev.     117:761-73, 

June  '20. 
Rawnsley,    The    Rev.     Canon    H.     D. 

Liquor     Control     and     the     Carlisle 

Experiment.     Hib.    Jour.    18:557-71, 

Apr.  '20. 
Roberts,  Georges  E.     La  Distribution  de 

la  richesse.     Rev.  pol.  et  parlem.  102: 

371-88,  Mar.  10,  '20. 


Shiels,   Albert.     A   Program   of   Ameri- 

icanization.     Amer.  Educa.  23:444-51, 

June  '20. 
Solomon,    H.    C.     Social    Workers    for 

Mental  Hygiene.     Mo.   Med.   2:465- 

66,  June  '20. 
Sontag,  Dr.    Unsere  Zeit  im  Spiegel  ihrer 

Strafgesetze.      Deutsche     Strafrechts- 
Zeitung  7:39-41,  Jan.-Feb.  '20. 
Staff,  Dr.  von.     Zur  Umgestaltung  des 

Gerichtsverfassungsgesetzes.  Deutsche 

Strafrechts-Zeitung    7:3-9,    Jan.-Feb. 

'20. 
Stanton,    S.    B.     Private    Rights    and 

Civic    Beauty.      Unpar.       14:130-40, 

July-Sept.  '20. 
Stocker,  Helene.     Erotik  u.  Altruismus. 

Die  Neue  Generation  16:53-69,  Feb.- 

Mar.  '20. 
Thoms,  Craig  S.     The  Religious  Unrest. 

Bib.  World  54:227-38,  May  '20. 
Thomson,  J.  S.    Symbiosis.     New  States- 
man 15:247-48,  June  '20. 
Todd,   A.   J.     Educating   the   Producer 

and  the  Consumer.     Survey  44:373- 

75,  June  '20. 
Tsien-Tal.     La     Reforme     penitentiaire 

en  Chine.     Rev.  pen.  droit  penal  158- 

65,  July-Oct.  '19. 
Vaerting,  Dr.  M.     Der  Konflikt  zwischen 

der     individuellen     und     generativen 

Leistung  beim  Menschen.     Die  Neue 

Generation  16:4-10,  Jan.  '20. 
.     Der    Nachwuchs    der    begabten 

Frauen.     Die    Neue    Generation    15: 

426-33,  Sept.  '19. 
Vercruysse,  Fr.     Les  R^centes  m^thodes 

de     pr6vention,     de     conciliation     et 

d 'arbitrage  des  conflits  industriels  en 

Grande-Bretagne.     Rev.     du     travail 

1S.-30.  Jan.  15,  '20. 
Williams,   H.   S.     The   Development  of 

the  Public  School  System  in  Missouri. 

Jour.  Negro  Hist.  5:137-65,  Apr.  '20. 
Williamson,  C.  C.     The  Origin  and  Cure       ^ 

of  "the  Bad  Boy."     Sociol.  Rev.  12: 

28-35,  Spring  '20. 
Woodburne,     Angus     S.     Reactions     of 

Welfare    Work    on    Religious    Work. 

Bib.  World  54:  276-81,  May  '20. 
Woods,   Er\'ille   B.     Have  Wages  Kept 

Pace  with  the  Cost  of  Living?     Ann. 

Am.  Acad.   Pol.  Soc.  Sci.  89:135-47, 

May  '20. ' 
Wright,    Chester   M.     How   the    Propo- 

gandists  Work  for  War  with   Mexico. 

Am.  Federationist  27:550-56,  June'  20. 


THE  AMERICAN 

JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 


Volume  XXVI  NOVEMBER     1 920  Number  3 


THE  COMPARATIVE  ROLE  OF  THE  GROUP  CONCEPT 
IN  WARD'S  DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY  AND  CONTEM- 
PORARY AMERICAN  SOCIOLOGY 


WALTER  B.  BODENHAFER 

Washington  University 


I.   THE  GROWTH  OF  GROUP  CONSCIOUSNESS 

A  study  in  social  theory  cannot  ignore  the  fundamental  fact 
of  the  social  life,  which  is  the  source  of  all  sound  theory  as  it  is 
the  test  of  all  results  of  reflection.  The  attempt  to  separate  social 
life  from  social  theory  is  one  that  has  resulted  in  disaster  both  for 
the  theory  and  for  the  on-going  life-stream/  On  the  one  hand  it 
creates  a  theory  which,  like  metaphysical  philosophy,  finally 
exhausts  itself  in  fruitless  evanescent  speculations;  and  on  the 
other  hand,  by  failing  to  furnish  the  developing  life  a  working  and 
tested  technique,  it  has  allowed  the  social  life  to  develop  as  an 
undirected  and  wasteful  process.  If  one  accepts  the  conclusion 
arrived  at  by  Herbert  Spencer  in  his  Social  Statics  ajid  developed 

'  For  one  of  the  best  illustrations  both  of  the  fact  and  the  results  of  such  separa- 
tion one  might  call  attention  to  Germany.  Professor  John  Dewey,  in  his  German 
Philosophy  and  Politics,  makes  this  attempted  separation  on  the  part  of  German 
thinkers  the  key  to  his  mterpretation  of  the  German  nation.  The  German  attempt 
to  reconcile  esoteric  intellectual  freedom,  an  ideal  freedom,  with  an  autocratically 
dominated  social  and  industrial  life  was  an  impossible  attempt,  and  one  which  led 
to  German  ruin  and  a  shaken  world. 

273 


2  74  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

by  Sumner,  namely,  that  the  social  process*  goes  on  irrespective  of 
social  control  or  direction,  then  indeed,  the  second  of  the  conse- 
quences of  the  separation  of  theory  from  social  life  is  probably  a 
desideratum,  for  it  brings  about  the  result  aimed  at,  namely,  non- 
interference in  the  workings  of  a  process  of  natural  laws.  But 
society  at  large,  social  scientists  in  general,  and  sociologists  in 
particular,  have  swimg  away  from  the  laissez  faire  philosophy  and 
are  more  and  m  ore  given  to  a  refinement  of  their  technique  of 
social  control  on  the  assumption  that  such  tools  will  have  an 
actual  use  in  modifying  the  social  process.^  The  conclusion  seems 
to  be  sound  that  social  theory  and  the  social  process  are  somehow 
interrelated,  and  can  never  be  wholly  or  to  any  extent  separated 
if  thought  is  to  remain  sound  and  instrumental,  and  if  the  activities 
of  life  are  to  be  saved  from  the  wasteful  and  costly  results  of  uncon- 
trolled movements.^  Whatever  valuation  may  be  put  on  the  place  of 
social  theory,  whether  one  regard  it  as  performing  the  function  of 
leadership  in  mediating  group  crises  and  as  thus  shaping  and  influ- 
encing social  development,  or  whether  one  regard  it  as  merely  a 
rationalizing  of,  and  speculation  on,  past  events,  and  relatively 
ineffective  and  futile  both  as  an  academic  pursuit  and  as  a  practi- 
cable matter,  one  must  assume  that  there  is  some  connection  more 
or  less  vital  between  social  theory  and  social  life.  We  may  take  it 
for  granted,  then,  that  the  development  of  social  theory  in  general, 
or  of  any  partial  phase  of  social  theory,  has  been  more  or  less 
closely  related  to  the  actual  social  life  which  has  developed.  We 
should  expect,  if  that  were  our  present  problem,  to  find  that  such 

'  The  concept  "social  process"  is  used  here  in  the  sense  in  which  it  has  been 
largely  standardized  by  Dr.  Small  in  his  General  Sociology. 

'  Dr.  Small  has  called  attention  (^American  Journal  oj  Sociology,  XXI,  755)  to 
the  fact  that  L.  F.  Ward's  most  significant  contribution  to  sociology  in  America  is 
his  emphasis  on  the  psychic  factor  as  a  new  and  controlling  factor  in  human  develop- 
ment. On  this  Ward  joined  issue  with  Sumner  and  Spencer  and  became  a  pioneer 
in  this  respect  in  social  science  in  the  United  States. 

J  One  might  call  attention  here  to  the  nature  of  thought  and  its  function  as 
described  by  that  group  of  writers  who  are  referred  to  by  such  terms  as  functionalists, 
behaviorists,  pragmatists,  instrumentalists.  The  essence  of  this  view,  I  take  it,  is 
(in  so  far  as  this  point  is  concerned)  that  thought  is  conduct,  reflection  is  a  t>'pe  of 
conduct  and  arises  in  mediation  of  crises,  i.e.,  conflict  situations.  On  this  assumption 
then  social  theory  must  be  organically  and  functionally  connected  with  the  social 
process.     They  cannot  be  separated. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"     275 

sliifts  as  may  be  shown  to  have  taken  place  in  sociological  thought 
during  the  last  four  decades  have  had  a  direct  relation  to  the  enor- 
mous changes  that  have  taken  place  in  our  industrial,  technical, 
agricultural,  and,  in  a  word,  our  whole  social  structure  and  function. 
To  trace  out  that  relation  is  not  our  present  problem.  Such  a  task 
remains  to  be  done  in  a  separate  work.  The  assumption  upon 
which  succeeding  chapters  rest  is  that  those  who  rely  almost 
exclusively  on  social  theory  on  the  one  hand,  and  those  who  scoff 
at  theory  as  relatively  futile  and  archaic  on  the  other,  are  both 
wrong;  that  a  better  working  hjrpo thesis  is  that  the  true  relation 
is  a  constantly  developing  reciprocal,  a  give-and-take  process. 
A  well-rounded  discussion  must  include  them  both.  Instrumen- 
talist philosophy  and  psychology  discover  in  social  theory  and  the 
social  process  two  phases  of  a  more  rational  societal  evolution. 

Without  attempting  further  to  investigate  the  problem  of  the 
causal  relationship  between  social  theory  and  social  life  since 
1880,  it  is  essential  to  give  in  bold  strokes  some  of  the  more  striking 
changes  in  American  social  development  since  the  date  mentioned, 
in  order  that  there  may  appear  the  whole  complex  background 
for  the  consideration  of  one  phase  of  the  shift  in  social  theory. 
In  general  it  may  be  said  that  such  changes  indicate  a  growing 
consciousness  of  the  fundamental  nature  of  the  group  in  all  the  multi- 
plied forms  of  social  activity.  It  is  the  purpose  of  the  rest  of  this 
chapter  to  point  out  such  facts  in  more  detail. 

First  of  all  one  must  note  the  changes  that  have  taken  place 
in  the  economic  processes  of  society,  particularly  in  industry,  and 
the  group  organizations  of  persons  interested  or  employed  in  those 
processes.  The  possibilities  latent  in  the  principle  of  the  division 
of  labor  have  reached  a  realization  since  1880  such  as  was  undreamed 
of  in  the  earlier  periods  of  our  industrial  development.  The  appli- 
cation of  inventions  to  productive  processes,  the  utilization  of 
steam  power,  the  increase  in  means  of  transportation  of  the  earlier 
part  of  the  last  centur}^,  prepared  the  way  for  an  industrial  expan- 
sion, following  the  panic  of  1873,  which  altered  our  whole  life, 
created  what  is  known  as  big  business,  made  the  factory  the  domi- 
nant mode  of  industrial  production,  conditioned  the  appearance  of 
the  various  forms  of  combination,  made  necessary  the  readjustment 


276  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

of  labor  problems,  stimulated  the  concentration  of  people  in  cities, 
and  resulted  in  the  transition  of  American  life  from  an  agricultural 
to  a  predominantingly  industrial  type.  On  the  whole,  then,  how- 
ever long  the  factors  had  been  preparing  for  the  shift,  the  four 
decades  since  1880  have  seen  enormous  changes  in  our  whole  life. 
The  individualism  so  characteristic  of  American  life  began  to  give 
way  to  a  collectivism  of  fact  in  which  group  solidarity  began  to 
rise  into  consciousness  as  a  matter  of  practical  importance  and 
significance.  Individualism  began  to  break  down  in  business,  in 
community  life,  in  actual  governmental  practice,  in  religious  and 
social  organization  of  all  types;  and  in  the  place  of  the  atomistic 
nature  of  our  previous  social  organization  there  developed  what 
Dicey  has  called,  in  speaking  of  England  of  the  nineteenth  century, 
the  central  fact,  namely,  the  trend  to  collectivism.  This  trend 
has  not  been  a  movement  carefully  planned  and  directed  by  a 
foreseeing  leadership.  It  has  been  largely  a  result  of  a  crude  and 
blind  change  brought  about  by  the  new  factors  arising  in  the  whole 
social  situation.  What  these  factors  are  has  been  suggested.  The 
chief  ones  are  the  development  of  the  means  of  communication  and 
transportation  both  within  the  country  and  with  other  countries. 
Speedy  and  wide  diffusion  of  intelligence  makes  possible  the  forma- 
tion of  great  industries,  while  the  development  of  transportation 
facilities  both  in  capacity  and  in  speed  is  essential  for  the  handling 
of  the  products  of  those  industries.  By  means  of  such  improve- 
ments the  western  part  of  the  country  became  economically 
incorporated  into  national  life,  the  frontier  of  free  land  disappeared, 
no  longer  affording  an  outlet  for  the  economically  suppressed. 

It  is  not  without  significance  that  the  development  of  com- 
munication and  transportation  finds  a  corresponding  development 
in  what  is  known  as  business  combinations.  The  latter  are  confined 
almost  wholly  in  their  important  phases  to  the  period  beginning 
after  the  panic  of  1873.^  There  were,  of  course,  "agreements" 
prior   to   that   time,  but   the  year   1877   saw  the  birth   of   the 

'  "The  panic  of  1873  again  accelerated  the  movement  toward  industrial  com- 
bination by  forcing  many  small  concerns  into  bankruptcy;  and  soon  after  the  recovery 
from  the  panic  of  1893  the  rush  toward  integration  of  industries  began."  Carlton, 
History  and  Problems  of  Organized  Labor,  p.  68. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"     277 

great  railroad  "pools"  which  were  the  dominating  form  of  con- 
solidation down  to  the  nineties.*  The  form  of  combination  of 
capital  has  varied,  viz.,  amalgamations,  mergers,  etc.,  but  the 
development  has  been  steadily  toward  a  larger  and  more  finished 
consolidation  of  capitalistic  enterprise.  The  Sherman  Anti-Trust 
Act  of  1890  is  an  evidence  of  a  growing  consciousness  of  a  new 
and  important  change  in  American  industrial  life.  It  indicated  a 
pronounced  trend  toward  capitalistic  solidarity  and  conununity 
of  interest.  Out  of  the  actual  experiences  of  life  and  the  increased 
technical  facilities  there  has  arisen  a  new  sense  of  group  solidarity 
which  is  essential  for  industrial  progress.  This  necessarily  has 
conditioned  profound  changes  in  every  form  of  social  life,  and 
enters  into  and  shapes  the  form  and  content  of  the  smallest  primary 
groups  in  society. 

Thus  far  in  the  discussion  of  economic  changes,  attention  has 
been  directed  primarily  to  the  organization  of  capital,  of  industries, 
and  their  increased  consciousness  of  economic  solidarity.  Before 
leaving  this  part  of  the  discussion,  however,  attention  must  be 
given  to  that  other  large  factor  in  industrial  enterprise,  namely, 
labor.  One  might  term  this  the  reverse  side  of  the  shield;  for 
along  with  other  industrial  changes  there  have  come  many  changes 
in  the  quality  of  labor,  the  nature  of  labor,  the  racial  composition 
of  laborers,  their  forms  of  association,  and  their  philosophy  of 
labor  and  life.  The  chief  interest  for  us  at  this  point  is  the  develop- 
ment of  group  consciousness  and  group  solidarity  among  laborers 
and  of  combinations  of  laborers  for  various  ends.  Possibly  no 
part  of  our  population  shows  more  clearly  the  growth  of  a  practical 
recognition  of  the  essential  part  that  a  group  plays  than  does  the 
labor  movement. 

The  movement  toward  organization  and  combination  among 
American  laborers  began  very  early  in  the  nation's  history,  but  it 
is  practically  true  that  the  important  development  of  labor  organi- 
zations has  come  since  the  Civil  War  and  particularly  since  1880." 

'  Haney,  Business  Organization  and  Combination,  p.  165. 

*  Unions  had  been  formed  as  early  as  1825,  workingmen's  parties  had  been 
organized,  papers  had  been  published,  but  all  were  sporadic  and  short  lived. 


278  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

"All  the  labor  movements  of  the  pre-Civil  War  period  were  epheme- 
ral and  soon  disintegrated."''  It  was  not  until  the  last  quarter  of 
the  past  century  that  conditions  were  ripe  for  the  appearance 
of  powerful  labor  groups  paralleling  chronologically  the  appearance 
of  combinations  of  capital  and  large-scale  industr>\  Professor 
Carlton  summarizes  the  point  thus : 

In  the  Civil  War  period  labor  was  never  strongly  organized.  No  clear 
vision  of  the  solidarity  of  the  laboring  classes  had  as  yet  caught  and  held  the 
attention  of  the  wage  earners.  But  the  Civil  War  made  permanent  labor 
organization  inevitable.  The  Civil  War  marks  a  transition  period  in  our 
labor  history.  Concentrated  capital,  the  extensive  use  of  the  subdi\'ided 
labor,  the  influx  of  the  cheap  labor  of  Southern  Europe,  and  the  peopling  of 
the  West  have  given  organized  labor  its  big  problems.  Henceforward,  the 
United  States  was  destined  to  be  "an  industrial  community  which  organized 
its  industries  on  a  large  scale."  With  the  panic  of  1873  unionism  suffered  a 
temporary  check  only  to  be  followed  by  a  new  era  in  the  history  of  labor 
organization.* 

It  Is  not  essential  to  the  purpose  here  to  trace  out  in  detail  the 
various  stages  in  the  subsequent  development  of  labor  organiza- 
tions. The  chief  endeavor  is  to  make  clear  the  new  era  which  was 
ushered  in  at  the  close  of  the  panic  which  began  in  1873.  Following 
that  period  the  order  known  as  the  ICnights  of  Labor  grew  up.  Its 
first  general  assembly  was  held  in  1878,  when  it  reported  80,000 
members.  By  1885  its  members  exceeded  100,000,  and  the  next 
year  it  reached  the  high-water  mark  of  its  career  with  a  membership 
of  more  than  600,000.  With  its  purposes,  organization,  and  work, 
we  are  not  here  concerned.  It  is  sufficient  to  point  out  that  it 
subsequently  gave  way  to  another  organization  founded  in  1881, 
the  American  Federation  of  Labor,  which  grew  slowly  but  surely 
until  it  became  and  still  is  the  dominant  force  in  the  labor  world. 
The  history  of  this  latest  body  is  a  study  in  itself,  and  is  outside  the 
limits  of  this  investigation.  As  it  stands  it  is  an  interesting  com- 
mentary on,  and  witness  of,  the  enormous  changes  that  have 
taken  place  in  industrial  life  since  its  inception.  It  is  particu- 
larly interesting  in  so  far  as  it  shows  the  steady  trend  toward  the 
group  basis  of  labor  activity,  and  the  increasing  consciousness  of 

•  Carlton,  History  and  Problems  of  Organized  Labor,  p.  41. 
'  Ibid.,  p.  64. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"     279 

the  occupational  group  as  a  factor  in  individual  development  and 
social  organization. 

Although  passing  through  various  crises  and  varying  fortunes, 
the  authorities  in  control  of  the  Federation  have  pretty  generally 
maintained  the  policy  of  trade  unionism  as  against  industrial 
unionism,  and  have  pretty  consistently  refrained  from  political 
organization  and  action  to  attain  their  ends.  It  has  been  pointed 
out'  that  the  trade-union  type  must  eventually  give  way  to  the 
industrial  type  as  a  result  of  the  changes  that  have  taken  place  in 
industrial  organizations.  The  increased  concentration  of  the 
latter,  and  the  abolition  of  skilled  trades  in  great  factories  through 
the  introduction  of  more  complex  and  efl&cient  machinery,  have 
paved  the  way  for  a  different  type  of  labor  group  organizations. 
One  writer  expresses  the  view  thus : 

These  facts  point  toward  the  conclusion  that  the  industrial  union  is  an 
effective  form  of  organization.  The  evidence,  moreover,  leads  almost  inevi- 
tably to  the  further  conclusion  that  the  old  line  type  of  separate  trade-unions, 
even  when  loosely  affiliated  with  each  other  through  the  American  Federation, 
cannot  effectively  cope  with  hostile  trusts  and  strong  employers'  associations 
expect  in  those  cases  in  which  skill  or  a  particularly  strategic  situation  gives 
them  an  advantageous  position.  Greater  solidarity  than  craft  unionism  is 
necessary  to  cope  with  the  trust  employing  minutely  subdivided  labor.* 

If  the  conclusion  just  stated  be  true,  and  the  industrial  union 
gradually  supplants  the  trade-union  in  all  except  the  particularly 
skilled  trades  and  those  involving  unusual  responsibility  as  well  as 
skill,  then  a  new  type  of  labor  solidarity  arises,  that  of  the  particular 
industry  rather  than  that  of  disparate  trades  within  an  industry. 
Such  a  transformation  brings  about  new  attitudes,  new  group 
consciousness  and  new  powers.  It  dissolves  the  basis  for  the 
older  trade-imion  aristocracy,  and  supplants  it  with  a  more  demo- 
cratic type  of  group  alignment  and  group  control.  It  makes 
possible  one  of  the  first  steps  toward  the  organization  of  all  or  a 
large  majority  of  unskilled  workers  for  positive  action.  It  sup- 
plants the  older  conception  of  democracy  as  a  rule  by  individuals 
in  the  mass  with  the  sounder  conception  of  the  group  as  the  unit 

•  Parker,  Quarterly  Journal  of  Economics,  XXXIV,  564-69.  Cummins,  American 
Journal  of  Sociology,  XIII,  759. 

*  Carlton,  History  and  Problems  of  Organized  Labor,  p.  77- 


28o  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OP  SOCIOLOGY 

and  agency  of  democratic  progress.^  Political  theorists  are  giving 
increasing  attention  to  the  occupational  group  as  a  basis  for  repre- 
sentation, on  the  ground  that  such  groups  constitute  more  effective 
units  than  geographical  districts,  and  that  representations  from 
such  groups  come  nearer  to  representing  some  definite  factor  in 
the  social  organization.  If  future  experience  proves  the  need  for 
greater  permanence  of  such  shifts  in  the  method  of  representation, 
one  of  the  preparatory  steps  is  that  of  the  organization  of  the 
unskilled  workers  on  an  industrial  rather  than  on  a  trade  or  craft 
basis.  What  may  be  the  final  issue  is  not  to  be  predicted;  the 
purpose  here  is  merely  to  call  attention  to  a  perceptible  shift  in 
the  type  of  group  organization  that  is  going  on  in  a  relatively 
blind  and  unreflective  manner  among  the  workers,  as  a  result  of 
certain  new  and  changing  factors  in  the  whole  industrial  situation, 
and  to  suggest  a  simultaneous  parallel  in  political  theory.  It  is 
another  signpost  pointing  to  the  changing  society  that  has  been 
arising  since  Ward's  Dynamic  Sociology  was  in  the  making. 

Another  significant  implication  of  the  growth  of  practical 
group  organization  among  labor  is  that  such  organization  becomes 
essential  if  labor  is  to  assume  a  share  in  control  of  industry.  An 
imorganized  mass  of  unskilled  laborers  is  unfitted  for  any  voice  in 
control  or  management.  The  labor  group  is  the  first  essential, 
and  this  is  being  developed  practically  by  labor  itself. 

Certain  forces  in  American  society  seem  to  be  breaking  down 
the  second  policy  of  organized  labor,  namely,  non-political  action. 
There  can  be  little  doubt  that  hitherto  the  leaders  of  the  American 
Federation  have  reflected  the  actual  spirit  and  sentiments  of  the 
great  mass  of  laborers  as  against  a  miUtant  minority  who  favored 
political  action.  Our  type  of  industrial  life,  the  presence  of  a 
large  agricultural  class,  the  absence  of  serious  and  widespread 
poverty,  etc.,  have  induced  a  conservative  labor  opinion  and 
labor  leadership.  The  Great  War  with  its  general  loosening  of 
bonds,  its  stimulation  of  labor's  expectations,  the  rising  cost  of 
living,  and  the  labor  movements  abroad  created  a  new  group  con- 
sciousness in  labor  ranks.  Following  the  war  employers  assumed 
a  hostile  attitude,  government  adopted  a  reactionary  policy  of 

'  Thia  will  be  expanded  in  later  chapters.    See  also  Follett,  The  New  State. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  ''DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY''     281 

intimidation,  denial  of  free  speech,  assembly,  and  press,  reverting 
to  a  repressive  attitude  and  the  use  of  legal  methods  which  made 
clear  to  a  larger  part  of  the  workers  that  mere  trade-union  warfare 
even  cannot  be  carried  on  so  long  as  hostile  forces  make  such 
trade-union  activity  impossible.  Labor  seems  forced,  therefore, 
merely  in  order  to  preserve  and  make  effective  its  former  policy, 
to  embark  upon  a  political  policy  to  protect  its  methods  from 
interference  and  nullification.  If  such  a  departure  occurs  it  will 
mark  an  increasing  importance  of  economic  groups  as  a  factor  in 
social  and  political  life. 

The  foregoing  pages  have  attempted  to  present  some  phases  of 
the  economic  background  for  our  study  of  the  group  concept  in 
social  theory  since  1880.  The  central  thought  throughout  has 
been  to  call  attention  to  the  growth  of  industry,  and  of  group 
organizations  immediately  in  connection  with  industrial  life.  It  is 
now  in  order  to  call  attention  briefly  to  the  change  in  governmental 
practices  and  policies  arising  out  of  the  industrial  changes  during 
the  same  period. 

One  of  the  most  illuminating  evidences  of  the  vital  changes 
that  have  taken  place  in  our  whole  national  life  is  the  change  that 
has  taken  place  in  the  quality  and  quantity  of  governmental 
"interference"  in  the  industrial  processes  of  our  society.  Though 
bitterly  contested  by  industry  and  hampered  by  the  constitution 
and  the  courts,  the  country  has  steadily  passed  from  an  individual- 
istic laissez  faire  policy  to  one  of  vigorous  control  of  industry  and 
protection  of  the  dependent  classes  employed  in  such  industries. 
This  transformation  has  come  in  response  to  needs  developing  out 
of  the  actual  life  of  society,  and  expresses  a  new  consciousness  of 
social  solidarity — of  the  fundamental  importance  of  the  group  life. 
In  general,  one  may  say  that  with  minor  exceptions  the  bulk  of 
such  legislation  lies  within  the  period  beginning  since  the  seventies. 
It  was  a  concomitant  of  those  fundamental  changes  in  our  industrial 
life  which  have  been  suggested  above.  On  every  hand  one  finds 
evidence  of  the  collectivistic  practice.  The  government  has  gone 
into  business.  It  has  created  postal  savings  banks,  parcel  post; 
municipalities  have  extended  their  control  over  water  plants,  the 
production  of  gas,  heat,  and  light.     Regulation  has  grown  steadily. 


282  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

The  Interstate  Commerce  Commission  and  the  Sherman  Anti- 
Trust  Law  are  significant  in  showing  the  newer  attitude  of  American 
society.  The  regulation  of  railroad  rates,  services,  and  business 
practices,  the  extension  of  control  over  corporations,  the  pure  food 
laws,  reservation  of  public  lands,  the  conservation  of  resources,  the 
imposition  of  inheritance  and  income  taxes,  are  some  of  the  eloquent 
witnesses  of  the  increasmg  insistence  upon  the  social  interest  in  all 
the  manifestations  of  our  industrial  energies.  The  socialization 
of  industry,  whether  by  ownership,  as  in  the  case  of  municipal 
power  and  light  plants,  or  by  regulation  as  in  the  case  of  the  rail- 
ways and  trusts,  or  by  the  still  less  tangibly  coercive  method  of 
publicity,  is  a  definite  working  h^^pothesis  that  has  developed 
almost  wholly  in  the  last  half-century.  It  is  an  evidence  of  a  new 
sense  of  social  solidarity,  of  group  consciousness  which  has  evolved 
naturally  out  of  the  actual  social  experiences  of  American  life. 

In  addition  to  this  direct  type  of  social  control  of  industrial 
life,  there  is  another  large  and  noteworthy  class  of  legislation  which 
is  an  important  part  of  social  interest  in  economic  organization. 
This  includes  that  body  of  legislation  which  has  to  do  with  the 
protection  of  the  labor  element  in  industry.  Here  again  the 
development  of  this  important  program  has  been  almost  wholly  a 
phenomenon  of  the  period  following  the  panic  of  1873.  With  the 
exception  of  a  few  isolated  and  unimportant  attempts  to  limit 
the  hours  of  labor  for  women  and  children,  there  was  practically 
no  labor  legislation  of  importance  until  after  the  Civil  War  period. 
Even  laws  relating  to  child  labor  did  not  assume  any  importance 
until  some  time  after  the  Massachusetts  acts  of  1866  and  1867. 
It  was  in  the  period  of  expansion  following  the  panic  of  the  next 
decade  that  this  elementary  type  of  protective  legislation  became 
a  real  factor  in  legislative  control  of  industry.  The  same  holds 
true  of  laws  relating  to  hours  of  women  and  of  men  in  public 
service,  to  laws  regulating  conditions  of  labor,  prescribing  safety 
appliances,  and  protective  devices.  In  addition,  workmen's  com- 
pensation laws,  accident  insurance,  and  minimum  wage  laws  for 
women  and  children  are  still  more  recent. 

The  strength  of  the  movement  for  social  legislation  of  these 
types  is  clearly  shown  when  it  is  recalled  that  they  have  come  in 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"     283 

spite  of  the  strenuous  opposition  of  three  powerful  influences, 
namely,  first,  the  owners  of  the  industries  themselves;  second, 
the  constitution  and  the  courts;  and  third,  the  traditional  indi- 
vidualistic attitudes  of  American  life. 

Still  another  extension  of  the  principle  of  group  solidarity  in 
legislation  is  found  in  the  social  treatment  of  disease,  both  by  pre- 
ventive sanitation,  and  dissemination  of  information,  and  by 
pubhc  and  quasi-public  agencies  and  institutions.  The  growth  of 
the  consciousness  of  the  social  nature  of  disease  and  of  group 
responsibility  for  the  prevention  of  disease  is  relatively  new.  The 
inclusion  of  national  vitality  by  the  National  Conservation  Com- 
mission^ as  among  the  chief,  if  not  the  chief,  national  resource  is 
deeply  significant  in  that  it  shows  in  another  way  the  increased 
appearance  of  group  consciousness  and  group  responsibility  as  a 
result  of  scientific  discoveries  and  actual  experience  in  a  rapidly 
intensifying  group  life.  Probably  no  other  period  has  seen  such 
a  rapid  recognition  of  the  principles  of  the  social  nature  of  disease 
and  of  group  responsibility  for  its  prevention  and  cure  as  the  last 
four  decades. 

Another  striking  example  of  group  consciousness  in  dealing  with 
a  specific  problem  is  the  interesting  experiment  of  prohibitory  meas- 
ures in  the  case  of  intoxicating  liquors.  This  again  is  a  product  of 
the  last  few  decades.  The  consummation  of  this  type  of  social 
control  marks  a  decided  step  away  from  an  individualistic  atti- 
tude, and  negative  legislative  policy,  toward  a  social  or  group 
attitude  and  group  assumption  of  responsibility. 

Mention  has  already  been  made  of  the  fact  that  municipal 
ownership  of  certain  productive  enterprises  has  been  accomplished 
in  many  cities  and  towns  over  the  country.  The  chief  forms  of 
municipally  owned  productive  enterprises  are  those  concerned  with 
the  manufacture  of  electricity  and  gas,  the  furnishing  of  water 
and  transportation.  The  essentially  social  nature  of  such  activi- 
ties in  municipal  life  is  becoming  increasingly  clear.  Municipal 
ownership  of  gas,  light,  and  water  plants  has  become  so  much  a 
part  of  the  ordinary  course  of  life  in  many  cities  as  to  be  no  longer 

» See  Btdletin  30  of  the  Committee  of  One  Hundred  on  National  Health,  being  a 
report  on  national  vitality  by  Irving  Fisher. 


284  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

in  the  field  of  consciousness — there  are  no  competing  moral  or 
political  values  or  plans.  Along  with  these  rather  stereotyped 
examples  of  municipal  group  activity  there  have  developed  the 
great  municipal  park  systems,  municipal  improvements  of  lake 
fronts  and  waterways,  municipal  bathing  beaches  and  pleasure 
resorts,  municipal  libraries  and  restrooms,  municipal  hospitals 
and  asylums,  municipal  reference,  statistical,  and  research  bureaus, 
municipal  legal  aid  and  welfare  associations.  These  constitute  but 
a  partial  list  of  essentially  municipal  activities  which  indicate  a 
marvelous  growth  of  the  conception  of  a  municipality  as  an  organic 
unity.  On  the  whole,  these  developments  are  relatively  recent, 
coming  for  the  most  part  since  the  Civil  War  and  reconstruction 
period.  Speaking  of  the  subtle  way  in  which  such  a  transformation 
has  come  in  England,  Dicey  quotes  the  following  statement, 
reported  to  be  the  language  of  Sidney  Webb : 

The  practical  man,  oblivious  or  contemptuous  of  any  theory  of  the  social 
organism  or  general  principles  of  social  organization,  has  been  forced  by  the 
necessities  of  the  time  into  an  ever-deepening  coUectivist  channel.  Socialism, 
of  course,  he  still  rejects  and  despises.  The  individualist  town  councillor  will 
walk  along  the  municipal  pavement,  lit  by  municipal  gas,  and  cleansed  by 
municipal  broom,  with  municipal  water,  and  seeing,  by  the  municipal  clock 
in  the  municipal  market,  that  he  is  too  early  to  meet  his  children  coming  from 
the  municipal  school  hard  by  the  county  lunatic  asylum  and  municipal  hospital, 
will  use  the  national  telegraph  system  to  tell  them  not  to  walk  through  the 
municipal  park,  but  to  come  by  the  municipal  tramway,  to  meet  him  in  the 
municipal  reading  room  by  the  municipal  art  gallery,  museum,  librar>',  where  he 
intends  to  consult  some  of  the  national  publications  in  order  to  prepare  his  next 
speech  in  the  municipal  town  hall  in  favor  of  the  nationalization  of  canals  and 
the  increase  of  government  control  over  the  railway  system.  "Socialism, 
Sir!"  he  will  say,  "don't  waste  the  time  of  a  practical  man  by  your  fantastic 
absurdities."  "Self-help!  Sir,  individual  self-help,  that's  what's  made  our 
city  what  it  is."* 

Without  much  change  this  statement  would  be  true  of  numerous 
municipalities  in  the  United  States. 

Turning  aside  from  the  strictly  official  or  governmental  agencies, 
such  as  the  foregoing,  which  have  arisen,  there  is  found  a  large 
list  of  community  activities  which  are  properly  volimtary  move- 

'  Reputed  to  be  the  language  of  Sidney  Webb  by  George  Eastgate  in  the  Tirnes, 
August  33,  1902.     Quoted  by  Dicey  in  Law  and  Public  Opinion,  pp.  286-87. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY''      285 

ments,  but  which  are  essentially  expressions  of  the  same  practical 
interest  in  and  consciousness  of  the  unity  of  community  life  in  a 
more  restricted  geographical  extent  than  the  municipally  owned 
and  controlled  industries  and  agencies.  The  establishment  of 
community  centers,  of  neighborhood  groups  for  various  economic, 
social,  and  educational  ends,  is  one  of  the  more  recent  phases  of 
the  growth  of  group  consciousness  in  various  areas  of  cities  of  all 
sizes.^  The  use  of  the  school  as  a  social  center  and  the  creation 
of  other  institutions  around  which  the  community  interests  may 
center  and  develop  are  among  the  most  hopeful  evidences  of  a 
solution  of  numerous  municipal  problems.  In  the  main,  this  type 
of  development  has  not  arisen  out  of  a  theoretical  scheme  clamped 
down  on  a  given  community,  but  it  has  arisen  out  of  the  actual 
growth  of  the  community  problems  and  interests.  It  has  come 
about  through  the  discovery  of  a  community  of  interest  and  a 
recognition  of  social  solidarity,  while  almost  unconsciously  pur- 
suing disparate  individual  ends.  In  so  far  as  leadership  in  the 
form  of  conunimity  plans  has  arisen,  it  has  largely  arisen  in  response 
to  the  developing  needs  as  revealed  in  the  crises  of  the  local  group 
life.  Church  life  and  structure,  school  curricula,  and  programs  of 
other  agencies  have  responded  to,  rather  than  created,  the  essence 
of  the  group  life.  But  whatever  the  relative  place  of  the  theory 
and  practice  in  this  particular  case,  it  seems  quite  clear  that  a  new 
sense  of  group  solidarity  has  arisen  and  is  arising  out  of  the  practical 
life  as  it  is  developing  in  cities  and  towns  in  the  United  States. 

Another  very  interesting  example  of  the  way  in  which  organiza- 
tions have  responded  to  the  demands  of  practical  situations  is 
revealed  in  the  experience  of  charitable  organizations.  The 
charity  organization  movement,  for  example,  was  introduced  in 
this  country,  following  the  English  precedent,  immediately  after 
the  general  business  depression  of  1873-77.  Possibly  the  diiSiculties 
incurred  in  relieving  the  destitution  of  that  period  may  have 
hastened  the  organization  movement.^  At  any  rate  the  move- 
ment for  charity  organization  was  a  democratically  stimulated  one. 

'One  of  the  most  interesting  experiments  is  the  "social  imit"  plan  recently 
established  in  Cincinnati.     See  Survey,  November  15,  1919. 
'  Warner,  American  Charities  (1908),  p.  442. 


286  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

It  had  its  basis  in  the  need  for  co-ordination  of  competitive  and 
conflicting  agencies,  and  in  the  essential  fact  that  any  pathological 
maladjustment  requiring  some  kind  of  aid  or  assistance  is  funda- 
mentally a  social  or  group  matter.''  The  schedules  of  causes  of 
poverty,  for  example,  that  have  been  published  by  the  Charity 
Organization  Society  since  i88^  reveal  very  clearly  a  striking 
growth  of  the  essentially  social  or  group  nature  of  what  is  called 
poverty.  A  comparison  of  the  various  revisions  with  the  first 
schedules  of  1888  shows  in  a  very  convincing  fashion  the  revolution 
in  theory  and  practice  in  charitable  work  which  has  followed  as  a 
result  of  the  experience  of  forty  years  in  actual  contact  with  con- 
crete, living  problems.  That  revolution  may  be  summarized  in 
the  statement  that  the  shift  has  been  one  from  a  subjectivistic, 
individualistic  basis  to  a  group  basis;  practical  charity  work  had 
discovered  the  group  and  the  meaning  of  the  fact  of  group  solidarity 
as  the  point  of  departure.  In  place  of  the  individual  as  a  unit 
there  arose  a  plexus  of  group  relations  out  of  which  the  individual 
could  be  separated  only  by  an  abstraction. 

Without  further  illustration  of  the  change  in  municipal  life  and 
consciousness,  we  may  turn  to  a  similar  development  in  rural 
districts.  The  community-life  movement  is  a  recent  and  growing 
one.  The  rural-community  movement  ojQfers  a  peculiarly  striking 
example  of  the  growth  of  the  recognition  of  the  group,  because  in 
the  rural  districts  the  individualistic  attitude  reached  its  greatest 
development  and  permanence.  But  the  forces  at  work  are  tending 
to  incorporate  the  rural  life  not  only  into  the  economic  and  thought 
life  of  the  larger  national  and  state  groups,  but  are  creating  local 
solidarity  and  a  community  interest  which  furnishes  the  necessary 
preparation  for  effective  community  organization.  First  among 
the  factors  which  have  made  this  possible  are  the  increased  means 

'  Devine  suggests  the  fact  of  this  change  in  these  words:  "Within  the  past  few 
years  a  noticeable  change  has  taken  place  in  the  conference  of  charities,  in  the  dis- 
cussions among  social  workers,  in  the  special  periodicals  devoted  to  social  problems, 
and  in  the  more  general  daily  and  periodical  press.  A  new  unity  has  been  discovered 
underlying  various  charitable  activities  which  center  in  the  homes  of  the  poor.  It 
has  become  apparent  that  relief  societies,  charity  organization  societies,  religious, 
educational,  and  social  agencies,  and  public  departments  charged  with  the  care  of 
dependents,  form  practically  a  single  group  with  many  common  interests,  methods, 
difficulties,  and  dangers." — Devine,  Principles  of  Relief,  p.  10. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"    287 

of  communication  and  transportation.  The  coming  of  the  tele- 
phone, rural  free  delivery  of  mail,  the  development  of  better  roads, 
better  electric  and  steam  railroads,  and  the  invention  of  the  auto- 
mobile have  made  the  rural  districts  part  of  the  social  organism  to 
a  remarkable  degree.  Economically  the  farmer  has  become 
intricately  dependent  on  numerous  remote  and  varied  industries. 
Like  the  city  dweller  his  home  has  been  invaded  again  and  again 
by  industry,  and  one  by  one  occupations  have  been  removed 
from  it  to  other  specialized  industrial  agencies.  The  rapid  exten- 
sion of  communication  has  made  possible  the  creation  of  a  differ- 
ent and  better  type  of  mind  in  rural  life  and  the  development  of  a 
real  psychic  national  unity. 

As  a  result  of  the  modifications  that  have  taken  place  in  means 
of  communication  and  in  the  economic  life  of  rural  communities 
and  with  the  discovery  of  the  economic  and  social  solidarity  of  the 
rural  districts,  there  has  developed  the  rural  community  social  life. 
There  is  an  increasing  tendency  on  the  part  of  rural  communities 
and  their  leaders  to  recognize  not  only  the  legitimate  function  of 
amusement  and  entertaimnent  but  also,  which  is  of  chief  interest 
to  this  discussion,  the  essential  fact  of  the  group,  the  community 
as  the  true  local  unit. 

This  same  spirit  is  seen  in  the  field  of  education,  where  more, 
modem  types  of  educational  effort  are  being  carried  on.  The 
development  of  the  school  as  a  social  center,  in  some  places,  the 
readjustment  of  the  curriculum  to  meet  the  needs  prescribed  by 
local  social  conditions,  the  attempt  to  create  a  community  interest 
and  loyalty  which  will  attract  and  retain  the  rising  leadership,  the 
broadening  of  school  activity  to  include  a  closer  relation  with  com- 
munity activities:  these  are  all  expressions  of  a  community  sense, 
of  a  consciousness  of  group  needs  and  of  an  interest  in  a  social 
agency  which  is  designed  to  supply  them. 

The  extent  to  which  the  same  cormnunity  spirit  is  finding 
expression,  is  shown  in  the  way  in  which  religious  attitudes  and 
organizations  are  being  modified  in  so  many  rural  districts.  This 
is  seen  in  several  ways,  first,  in  the  growing  emphasis  on  the 
importance  of  the  local  group  as  a  religious  end ;  secondly,  the  way 
in  which  pre-existing  sectarian  division  lines  are  melting  away 


288  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

before  the  group  solidarity;  and  thirdly,  the  way  in  which  the 
religious  organization  is  being  broadened  to  include,  in  an  increased 
measure,  the  group  activities.  All  of  these,  of  course,  have  been 
influenced  by  leadership  and  by  outside  programs  and  experiments, 
but  they  show  quite  clearly  a  shift  of  emphasis  and  attention  not 
only  from  an  individualistic  to  a  group  ty-pe  of  religion,  but  also 
from  a  conception  of  religious  institutions  as  divisive  agencies  to  a 
conception  of  such  institutions  as  a  group  concern  and  group 
unifying  agency.  Here  as  elsewhere,  the  central  feature  of  rehgious 
programs  and  practices  that  show  most  signs  of  life  in  rural  com- 
munities is  the  recognition  of  the  solidarity  of  the  group  and  of  its 
place  in  practical  life. 

The  foregoing  pages  of  this  chapter  have  been  designed  to 
point  out  some  of  the  more  patent  ways  in  which  American  life 
since  1880  has  been  undergoing  a  transition.     The  effort  has  been 
to  present  this  transition  as  the  background  of  changing  mores 
and  practices  which  give  color  and  meaning  and  setting  to  the 
chapters  which  are  to  follow.    The  picture  is  necessarily  incom- 
plete.    The  complete  picture  would  involve  the  whole  social  history 
of  the  United  States.    The  central  feature  which  has  characterized 
the  transition  is  the  growth  in  practical,  living  experience  of  group 
solidarity,  the  increasing  recognition  on  the  part  of  the  practical 
man  of  the  essentially  social  nature  of  many  of  the  phases  of 
living,  and  of  an  almost  unconscious  increasing  use  of  the  principle 
of  group  solidarity  in  meeting  concrete  problems.     The  central 
place  of  the  group  as  a  matter  of  actual  life  is  a  working  principle 
which  has  been  developed  as  one  of  the  interesting  achievements  of 
the  last  four  decades.     The  transition  is  not  yet  complete;   it  has 
not  yet  been  realized  fully  in  any  one  line  nor  at  all  in  some  others, 
but  that  it  has  been  and  is  going  on  seems  quite  plain.     The  sub- 
sequent chapters  will  attempt  to  show  that  a  similar  transition 
has  taken  place  in  social  theory  between  1880  and  the  present  time. 

II.    ward's  use  of  the  group  concept,  with  particular 

REFERENCE   TO  HIS   "DYNAMIC   SOCIOLOGY" 

This  chapter  will  attempt  to  summarize,  first,  the  leading 
examples  of  Ward's  explicit  use  of  the  group  concept,  or  of  synony- 
mous terms  as  a  tool  of  sociological  thought;  secondly,  the  implied 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"     289 

use  of  such  a  concept;  and  thirdly,  the  results  upon  his  sociological 
system  of  his  use  or  failure  to  use  such  a  tool  of  thought. 

Before  proceeding  further  with  the  discussion  it  will  be  well  to 
point  out  the  reasons  for  the  selection  of  Ward,  and  chiefly  his 
earliest  work,  Dynamic  Sociology,  as  a  point  for  comparison  with 
contemporary  sociology.  The  aim  in  the  study  is  not  to  present 
an  evaluation  of  Ward's  contribution  to  sociological  thought,  but 
to  utilize  his  work  as  a  convenient  point  at  the  beginning  of  sociology 
in  America  to  make  clear  the  shift  in  method  that  has  taken  place 
in  respect  to  the  use  of  the  group  concept.  Ward  is  generally 
conceded  to  be  the  first  of  American  sociologists  in  point  of  time 
at  least.  The  appearance  of  his  Dynamic  Sociology  in  1883,  the 
writing  of  which  occupied  the  preceding  ten  years,  marked  the 
beginning  of  the  study  of  sociology  in  America.^  Whatever  value 
sociologists  may  attach  to  Ward's  work,  there  can  be  little  doubt 
of  the  inspiring  role  he  has  played  among  American  sociologists.' 
Whatever  new  developments  may  arise  in  social  theory,  whatever 
changed  methods  subsequent  sociology  may  introduce.  Ward's 
work  will  always  claim  a  considerable  place  in  the  continuity  of 
that  stream  of  thought  which  we  call  sociology.^  Just  what  that 
place  is,  is  without  the  province  of  this  discussion,  except  in  so  far 
as  it  relates  itself  to  one  particular  inquiry. 

The  selection  of  Ward  acquires  added  significance  from  the 
facts  that  have  been  presented  in  the  preceding  chapter,  that  the 
period  since  Ward  wrote  his  first  book  has  been  a  period  in  which 

'  Cf.  Small,  "Fifty  Years  of  Sociology-  in  the  United  States,"  American  Journal 
of  Sociology,  XXII  (1916),  748  fif. 

*  For  evidence  sustaining  this  point  see  "Appreciation  of  Ward,"  American 
Journal  of  Sociology,  II,  61-78  where  some  present-day  sociologists  give  an  estimate 
of  the  place  of  Ward  in  their  ovra  intellectual  history. 

i  Professor  Small  has  called  attention  in  his  "Fifty  Years  of  Sociology  in  the 
United  States,"  American  Journal  of  Sociology,  XXI  (1916),  750,  to  Ward's  isolation 
from  the  stream  of  thought  embodied  in  the  social  sciences  in  Europe,  particularly 
the  work  of  the  German  thinkers.  Dr.  Small  has  performed  a  unique  piece  of  work 
in  showing  the  continuity  of  that  stream  wth  modern  sociology.  Without  challen- 
ging the  correctness  of  Dr.  Small's  view  of  Ward's  isolation,  the  suggestion  may  be 
hazarded  that  a  development  of  the  Comtean  stream  in  the  case  of  Ward's  intellectual 
ancestry  might  relieve  a  part  of  the  isolation  which  seems  so  abrupt.  Possibly  after 
some  sociologist  has  done  for  the  line  of  thought  via  Comte  what  Dr.  Small  has  done 
so  ably  for  the  German  connection  the  former  may  assimie  greater  relative  importance. 


29©  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

American  life  has  been  undergoing  fundamental  social  changes  in 
every  phase  of  its  existence.  Not  only  has  there  gone  on  this 
marvelous  transformation  of  the  social  life  in  general,  as  a  practical 
growth,  but  also  the  same  period  marks  the  growth  of  the  scientific 
spirit  which  has  affected  the  thought  life  of  America  in  every  phase 
of  its  development.  The  period  marks  the  application  of  the 
evolutionary  philosophy  and  the  scientific  method  not  only  to  the 
physical  and  biological  sciences,  but  latterly  also  to  the  social 
sciences,  to  philosophy,  and  to  religion.  The  period  has  been  one 
of  rapid  intellectual  readjustment,  of  crumbling  hypotheses  and 
points  of  view  and  of  methods  of  such  a  far-reaching  nature  as  to 
mark  practically  the  birth  of  a  whole  new  era  in  both  theory  and 
practice.^  The  thought  may  be  expressed  in  Dr.  Small's  words  as 
the  "drive  toward  objectivity."  The  roots  of  the  new  currents  of 
thought  which  we  now  see  about  us  go  back  far  into  the  past. 
The  new  trends  were  long  in  preparation,  but  their  coming  to 
prominence  in  American  thought  life  has  been  almost  wholly  con- 
fined to  the  period  since  Ward  wrote  his  first  book  in  sociolog}\ 
In  few,  if  any,  periods  of  the  world's  history  have  changes  of  such 
momentous  implications  for  all  types  of  thought  taken  place  in 
such  a  brief  period  of  time. 

The  development  of  the  scientific  method  in  the  various  sciences, 
and  the  fruitful  discoveries  that  have  taken  place  in  the  last  four 
decades,  were  emphasized  by  the  papers  presented  at  the  St.  Louis 
Congress  of  Arts  and  Sciences.  Almost  without  exception  the 
speakers  find  in  this  period  the  coming  of  a  new  age  for  those 
sciences." 

•  Robinson  points  out  that  two  facts  of  transcendent  importance  were  discovered 
in  the  second  half  of  the  nineteenth  century,  namely,  Darwin's  doctrine  of  the  descent 
of  man  from  lower  organisms  and  Lyell's  collection  of  geological  evidence  to  show  the 
antiquity  of  man.     The  New  History,  p.  80. 

'  "In  his  recently  published  autobiography,  Herbert  Spencer  asserts  that  at  the 
time  of  issue  of  his  work  on  biology  (1864),  not  one  person  in  ten  or  more  knew  the 
meaning  of  the  word;  and  among  those  who  knew  it,  few  cared  to  know  anything 
about  the  subject.  That  the  attitude  of  the  educated  public  toward  biological  science 
could  have  been  thus  indifferent,  if  not  inimical,  forty  years  ago,  seems  strange  enough 
now  even  to  those  of  us  who  have  witnessed  in  part  the  scientific  progress  subsequent 
to  that  epoch.  But  this  was  a  memorable  epoch,  marked  by  the  advent  of  the  great 
intellectual  awakening  ushered  in  by  the  generalizations  of  Darwin,  Wallace,  Spencer, 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  ''DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"     291 

In  the  field  of  religion  the  period  includes  the  older  conflict 
between  the  developing  scientific  method  and  the  older  theolog}^ 
More  recently  there  has  appeared  the  important  swing  of  religious 
thought  to  the  social  approach  not  only  to  religious  origins  in 
general  but  to  Christianity  in  particular.  The  appearance  of  the 
so-called  social  interpretation  of  the  whole  Christian  sacred  litera- 
ture, and  of  the  lives  and  personalities  of  its  founders  and  out- 
standing characters,  marks  but  one  phase  of  the  vital  changes  of 
religious  thought  in  America  in  the  closing  quarter  of  the  nine- 
teenth century  and  the  first  quarter  of  the  twentieth  century. 
Not  even  the  Protestant  Reformation,  with  all  its  historic  impor- 
tance and  convulsive  upheavals,  created  changes  and  modifications 
in  religious  thought  of  such  deep  and  fundamental  significance  as 
those  that  have  peacefully  permeated  the  American  religious  world 
during  the  period  mentioned. 

To  do  more  than  make  the  briefest  general  reference  to  these 
elements  in  the  transition  period  is  beyond  the  purpose  here.  They 
are  cited  merely  for  the  purpose  of  pointing  out  the  transition 
nature  of  the  intellectual  life  of  the  period  which  this  paper  has 
under  consideration.  The  movements  in  the  thought  of  the 
period  and  the  course  of  the  actual  life  of  the  country  during  the 
same  time  have  gone  along  together.  The  causal  relation  between 
the  two  is  an  intricate  and  important  problem,  but  it  too  is  outside 
the  limits  of  the  present  discussion. 

With  reference  to  the  particular  attention  to  be  paid  to  Dynamic 
Sociology,  several  reasons  justify  such  a  course.  In  the  first  place, 
the  chronological  fact  of  its  appearance  at  the  beginning  of  what 
has  been  termed  the  transition  period  gives  it  prominence.  This 
is  especially  possible  because,  as  stated  before,  the  whole  of  Ward's 
sociological  structure  is  not  under  review,  so  that  a  selected  part 
may  be  taken  for  the  purpose  in  hand.  The  purpose  relieves 
one  from  the  discussion  of  each  of  Ward's  writings.     Furthermore, 


and  their  coadjutors.  And  the  quarter  of  a  century  which  inimediately  followed  this 
epoch  appears,  as  we  look  back  upon  it,  like  an  heroic  age  of  scientific  achievement. 
....  It  was  an  age  during  which  most  men  of  science,  and  thinking  people  in 
general,  moved  forward  at  a  rate  quite  without  precedent  in  the  history  of  human 
advancement."— Woodward,  "The  Unity  of  Physical  Science,"  International  Con- 
gress of  Arts  and  Sciences,  St.  Louis  (1904),  IV,  3. 


292  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

there  is  justification  for   the   choice   in  the  view  expressed   by 

Dr.  Small  that  Ward's  whole  system  is  contained  in  Dynamic 

Sociology,  viz. : 

Although  Ward  afterward  wrote  three  major  works,  besides  two  minor 
ones  and  numerous  monographs,  in  exposition  of  his  views,  I  have  never  dis- 
covered that,  in  any  essential  particular,  they  added  to  or  subtracted  from 
the  system  contained  in  Dynamic  Sociology.  Ward's  sociology  seems  to  have 
received  form  and  substance,  as  the  Germans  say,  aus  einem  Gusse.  All  that 
he  did  later  was  the  enlarging  of  replicas  or  details.' 

For  convenience  therefore  one  may  take  his  earliest  work  as  a 
basis,  and  utilize  subsequent  works  as  elaborations  and  elucida- 
tions of  his  central  system.  With  this  preliminary  outline  by  way 
of  introduction  we  are  now  prepared  for  a  more  detailed  study  of 
Ward's  use  of  the  group  concept  in  his  sociological  system. 

This  analysis  seeks  to  discover  the  extent  and  nature  of  the  use 
made  of  the  group  concept  in  Ward's  thinking,  particularly  in  the 
initial  formation  of  his  system  of  sociology.  In  general,  the  most 
striking  thing  about  the  work  under  review  is  the  absence  of  an 
express  use  of  the  group  concept  as  a  tool  of  analysis  or  explanation. 
As  such,  the  group  concept  is  absent  in  Ward's  earlier  work  and 
largely  so  in  his  whole  system.  This  does  not  mean  that  he  has 
neglected  the  factors  of  association  or  of  all  groups  whatsoever  is 
his  thinking.  On  the  contrary,  as  will  be  pointed  out  later,  he 
takes  note  of  the  social  factor  in  general,  but  his  sociology  is  never 
related  to  such  a  concept  as  the  group  as  its  central  feature,  at 
least  not  in  express  terras.  Though  modified  in  some  respects,  his 
sociology  remained  as  it  was  in  his  first  book,  essentially  an  indi- 
vidualistic one.  His  thinking  was  fundamentally  based  on  what 
Professor  Ford^  has  called  the  individual  hypothesis  as  against 
the  social  hypothesis.  The  whole  of  the  contrast  between  the 
sociology  of  Ward  and  the  newer  sociology  in  America  may  be 
summarized  in  the  contrast  suggested  by  these  two  hypotheses. 
The  conception  which  underlay  the  first  volume  of  Dynamic 
Sociology,  namely,  aggregation,  though  modified  in  minor  details, 
remained  the  corner  stone  of  Ward's  thinking.     Whether  dealing 

'  Small,  "Fifty  Years  of  Sociology  in  the  United  States,"  American  Journal  of 
Sociology,  XXI,  752. 

*  Natural  History  of  the  Slate. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"     293 

with  the  problems  of  social  origins  or  the  development  of  an  indi- 
vidual, the  hypothesis  was  that  of  the  individual  rather  than  the 
group,  as  the  starting-point.  The  details  of  these  general  observa- 
tions will  receive  elaboration  in  subsequent  pages. 

The  term  "group,"  as  intimated  above,  occurs  rarely,  if  at  all, 
in  Dynamic  Sociology.  It  finds  more  frequent  but  still  relatively 
rare  expression  in  Pure  Sociology.  To  assume  from  the  absence  of 
this  express  term  that  the  social  factor  was  not  a  part  of  Ward's 
system  of  thought  would  be  a  most  serious  error.  In  order  to 
estimate  properly,  therefore,  the  place  which  the  group  occupied 
in  Ward's  thought,  one  must  take  account  not  merely  of  specific 
references  to  it  as  such,  but  also  of  such  other  terms  as  have  a 
synonymous  or  similar  meaning.  The  end  sought  here  is  to  dis- 
cover the  use  made  of  a  fact  that  might  be  called  indifferently  a 
group,  or  society,  or  association,  etc.,  rather  than  to  discover  a  use 
of  a  mere  term.  We  are  interested  in  the  concept  rather  than  the 
word,  and  are  led  to  include  such  terms  as  society,  troop,  horde, 
association,  state,  race,  which  indicate  a  conception  of  some  kind 
of  situation  in  which  persons  are  in  an  interacting  plexus  of  rela- 
tions, a  stimulus  and  response  situation.  To  attempt  to  catalogue 
all  such  terms  used  by  Ward  even  in  his  first  work  alone  would 
be  a  large  and  relatively  fruitless  task.  Attention  will  be  centered 
rather  on  the  treatment  of  certain  problems  in  which  use  is  made 
of  the  concept  in  order  to  see  just  how  far  it  penetrates,  how  ade- 
quately it  ser\^es  as  a  tool  of  analysis,  and  in  how  far  it  is  faulty  in 
scope  and  application.  Possibly  the  contrast  with  contemporary 
sociology  which  may  appear  as  a  result  of  the  study  will  prove  to 
be  one  mainly  of  degree  rather  than  of  kind,  or  of  less  emphasis  as 
against  greater  emphasis.  In  pursuance  of  this  plan  of  study  we 
shall  take  up  several  problems  which  occupied  Ward  in  his  earliest 
work,  such  as  the  problem  of  the  origin  of  language,  of  society,  of 
ethics,  of  the  mind,  of  the  state,  the  problem  of  education,  and  the 
problem  of  legislation  and  of  government.  These  will  show  quite 
clearly  the  central  factor  we  seek,  namely,  the  place  of  the  group 
in  Dynamic  Sociology. 

As  an  approach  to  the  discussion,  the  first  interesting  point  is 
the  origin  of  society.     Society,  as  defined  by  Ward,  "in  its  literal 


294  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

or  primary  sense  is  simply  an  association  of  individuals."^  With- 
out further  investigation  of  the  nature  and  origin  of  society,  one 
could  see  in  this  statement  the  essence  of  Ward's  whole  sociological 
\aewpoint,  namely,  the  priority  of  the  individual.  This  atomistic 
viewpoint,  as  will  appear  throughout  this  investigation,  runs 
through  the  whole  of  Ward's  study.  The  group  is  a  result,  the 
individual,  a  datum.  Lest  too  much  be  anticipated,  it  will  be 
well  to  inquire  further  into  Ward's  conception  of  society  and  of 
the  group,  and  particularly  of  the  question  of  the  "social  nature" 
of  man.  It  will  be  well  to  cite  Ward's  views  at  length  at  this  point, 
because  it  is  a  vital  issue  in  the  whole  discussion. 

If,  then,  one  take  the  definition  of  society  as  given  by  Ward, 
the  questions  naturally  arise  how  and  when  and  why  did  society 
originate;  if  the  group  is  subsequent,  a  result,  how  did  it  arise; 
if  men  were  originally  anti-social,  how  did  they  become  social  ?  To 
most  of  these  questions  one  can  discover  pretty  definite  answers. 

Man  is  not  naturally  a  social  animal,  although  apparently  so. 
**The  fact,  that  throughout  all  historic  time  man  has  been  found 
associated,  has  naturally  given  rise  to  the  general  opinions  that  he 
is  by  nature  a  social  being.  And  this  is  doubtless  true,  for  man  as 
he  is,  and  has  been  ever  since  the  earliest  traditions.  But  whether 
he  was  originally  social  by  nature  is  quite  another  question  and  one 
which,  as  we  have  just  seen,  most  probably  demands  a  negative 
answer."^  In  this  respect  Ward  refused  to  follow  the  dictum  of 
Comte  as  to  the  essentially  social  nature  of  man;  in  other  words, 
he  insists  on  the  individual,  even  the  rational  individual,  as  a 
datum  from  which  the  whole  social  process  may  be  built  up  on  a 
rational  basis  of  socialization.  Concerning  the  Aristotelian  state- 
ment that  man  is  a  social  being,^  Ward  says: 

We  are  compelled  to  reject  the  doctrine  of  Aristotle  so  prevalent  every- 
where, that  man  is  naturally  a  gregarious  animal,  or,  as  it  is  less  objectionably 
stated,  that  man  is  naturally  a  social  being.  Civilized  man  is  undoubtedly 
a  social  being,  but  this  quality  has  been  the  result  of  long  and  severe  experi- 

•  Dynamic  Sociology,  I,  460.  '  Ibid. 

i  Whether  Aristotle  intended  or  had  in  mind  the  same  conception  which  his 
phrase  is  usually  assumed  to  connote  is  not  material  here.  We  accept  the  interpre- 
tations usually  given  it  because  we  are  interested  in  Ward's  conceptions  rather  than 
Aristotle's. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  ''DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"     295 

ence,  by  which  a  great  change  has  been  produced  in  his  constitution.  Not 
only  so,  but  he  is  utterly  incapable  of  social  existence  in  a  native  state,  unless 
protected  in  his  life,  his  liberty,  and  his  property  by  an  artificial  system  of 
government.' 

Although  he  admitted  that  none  of  the  living  forms  could  have 
been  the  immediate  ancestors  of  man,  and,  therefore,  "there  will 
always  remain  the  possibility  that  his  true  simian  ancestor  may 
have  been  a  gregarious  animal,  still  the  probabilities  are  against 
this  view,  and  it  seems  likely  that  throughout  his  purely  animal 
career  man  possessed  the  associative  habit  only  so  far  as  was 
necessary  for  the  maintenance  of  the  race."^  This  quotation 
indicates  that  in  no  respect  did  the  essential  feature  of  this  point 
undergo  any  change  in  Ward's  subsequent  thinking.  While  we 
find  man  in  association  wherever  we  see  him,  there  could  be  no 
association  without  first  the  development  of  the  individual  to  a 
point  where  he  could  perceive  the  advantage  of  such  association. 
"Although  we  now  almost  always  find  him  associated,  yet,  .... 
this  is  for  the  purposes  of  protection,  and  seems  not  to  have  been 
his  condition  until  after  his  intellect  had  become  strong  enough  to 
appreciate  and  devise  a  scheme  of  protection." ^  In  regard  to  the 
point  in  human  development  and  social  evolution  at  which  asso- 
ciation arose,  on  a  still  broader  basis  than  that  of  protection.  Ward 
applies  the  same  test,  namely,  when  the  intellect  had  developed  to 
a  point  sufficient  to  perceive  the  advantages  of  such  association. 
"I  regard  human  association  as  the  result  of  the  perceived  advan- 
tage which  it  yields  and  as  coming  into  existence  only  in  propor- 
tion as  that  advantage  was  perceived  by  the  only  faculty  capable 
of  perceiving  it,  the  intellect."''  We  shall  have  occasion  later  to 
revert  to  the  difficulties  and  implications  of  these  views.  They  are 
adduced  here  to  show  the  negligible  part  the  group  plays  in  Ward's 
fundamental  problem  of  social  origins. 

The  problem  of  the  social  or  anti-social  nature  of  man  brings 
into  the  foreground  of  discussion  the  question  of  the  existence  and 
origin  of  a  gregarious  instinct,  sentiment,  or  impulse.  Ward 
flatly  rejected  the  position  that  there  was  any  gregarious  instinct 

'  Dynamic  Sociology,  II,  221.  ^  Ibid.,  I,  463. 

'  Outlines  of  Sociology,  p.  90.  *  Ibid.,  90-91. 


296  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

or  impulse  which  was  a  part  of  man's  original  nature.  ''That 
there  existed  in  primordial  man  or  his  immediate  animal  ancestors 
an  innate  social  sentiment  which  naturally  drew  any  considerable 
number  of  men  together  is  not  only  improbable  a  priori,  but  is 
disproved  by  the  actual  condition  of  the  apes,  from  which  family, 
as  we  have  seen,  man  has  undoubtedly  descended."'  This  same 
thought  is  expressed  in  a  later  work  as  follows:  "I  am  inclined  to 
the  view  that  man  is  not  naturally  a  social  being,  that  he  has 
descended  from  an  animal  that  was  not  even  gregarious  by  instinct, 
and  that  human  society  ....  is  purely  a  product  of  his  reason, 
and  arose  by  insensible  degrees,  pari  passu  with  the  development 
of  his  brain.* 

If  there  was  no  such  thing  as  a  social  instinct,  and  if  then  the 
individual  somehow  developed  in  vacuo,  Ward  recognized  that  an 
account  of  social  origins  must  solve  the  problem  created  by  his 
atomistic  approach.  With  reference  to  the  part  the  social  instinct, 
which  is  itself  a  result  of  the  conflict  of  desires,^  played  in  the 
formation  of  the  social  nature  of  men  Ward  states : 

The  social  instinct  must  have  had  to  battle  long  and  hard  against  the 
momentary  selfish  desire  of  individuals,  and  its  triumph  was  due  to  the  fact 
that  the  desire  of  each  to  protect  himself  by  sustaining  the  community  gradu- 
ally came  to  exceed  the  desire  to  gratify  immediate  personal  wants  which 

were  incompatible  with  the  existence   of  society The  maintenance 

of  the  social  state,  which  was  at  its  origin,  and  still  is,  opposed  to  the  gratifica- 
tion of  many  strong  personal  desires,  depends  upon  the  degree  to  which  its 
benefits  are  realized,  whereby  the  counter-desire  of  a  higher  order  antagonizes 
the  anti-social  tendencies  and  finally  subordinates  them These  influ- 
ences, coupled  with  the  advantages,  which  an  ape  ought  to  perceive  as  clearly 
as  a  wolf,  gradually  gained  for  the  social  tendency  an  ascendant  which  secured 
its  ultimate  triumph. 

The  desire  or  instinct  to  associate  arose  after  the  advantages  of 
such  association  were  apparent  to  a  comparatively  highly  developed 
intellect.  But  this  desire  was  in  conflict  with  the  original  and 
natural  desire  of  man.  Out  of  this  conflict,  which  is  not  yet  com- 
pleted, there  is  developing  the  socialized  individual  who  is  gradually, 

'  Dynamic  Sociology,  I,  451,     For  a  summary  of  some  of  the  evidence  putting  in 
question  Ward's  genealogy  of  man  see  Ford,  Natural  History  of  the  State,  chap.  iii. 
•  Outlines  of  Sociology,  pp.  90-91.  »  Dynamic  Sociology,  I,  395. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"     297 

under  the  influence  of  his  intellect,  losing  his  original  anti- 
social nature  and  habits."  In  so  far  then  as  the  group  can  figure 
in  the  process  of  evolution,  it  is  relatively  secondary  in  both  time 
and  influence.  The  defects  in  this  view  will  occupy  the  discussion 
later  in  the  critical  summary  of  other  of  Ward's  views. 

In  order  to  illustrate  the  principle  upon  which  Ward  founded 
his  thought  in  his  sociological  system,  which  remained  essentially 
the  same  to  the  end  of  his  career,  it  will  be  worth  the  time  consumed 
to  consider  briefly  his  theory  of  aggregation  as  it  runs  through  his 
Dynamic  Sociology,  and  particularly  as  it  has  to  do  with  that 
phase  of  the  evolutionary  process  which  may  be  called  the  human 
period. 

The  phenomena  of  sociology,  unlike  those  of  anthropology,  but  equally 
with  those  of  biology  and  psychology,  present  us  with  an  additional  instance 
of  the  great  cosmic  process  of  aggregation  which  we  have  sought  to  trace 
out.  Just  as  the  highest  chemical  aggregates  forming  the  chemical  substance 
"protoplasm"  are  compounded  and  recompounded  in  the  formation  of  physio- 
logical and  then  of  morphological  units,  and  just  as  these  are  further  recom- 
pounded to  form  organic  aggregates  of  the  first,  second,  third,  etc.,  orders, 
so  are  the  highest  of  these  organic  aggregates,  or  men,  compounded  anew,  on 
precisely  the  same  principle,  to  form  society.  And  this  is  the  last  and  highest 
step  with  which  we  are  acquainted  of  this  long  unbroken  series  of  cosmical 
aggregations  leading  from  the  ultimate  material  atom  up  to  social  aggregate.^ 

This  passage  reveals  pretty  clearly  the  essentially  atomistic 
principle  upon  which  all  Ward's  thinking  was  based.  He  followed 
quite  consistently  the  individualistic  hypotheses.  There  are 
passages  in  which  he  seems  to  concede  more  or  less  the  importance 
of  the  group  or  social  hypothesis,  but  in  the  last  analysis  of  his 
thought  there  is  essentially  an  assumed  priority  of  the  individual. 
In  other  words,  the  group  concept,  which  has  come  to  be  such  a 
useful  tool  in  the  hands  of  contemporary  sociology,  never  found  an 
adequate  place  in  the  sociology  of  Ward.  In  subsequent  discus- 
sion the  implications  and  elucidations  of  this  criticism  or  obser- 
vation will  appear  more  clearly.  The  preceding  pages  have 
sought  to  show  the  relative  absence  of  the  group  as  a  means  of 

'  The  conflict  of  impulses  is  of  course  a  vital  factor  in  modern  social  psychology, 
but  such  a  conflict  situation  is  different  from  the  conflict  of  which  Ward  is  speaking. 
'  Dynamic  Sociology,  I,  450-51. 


298  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

explanation  of  the  development  of  man,  and  to  point  out  that  the 
r61e  of  the  group  was  relatively  secondary.^ 

The  large  group  called  the  state  or  government  received  con- 
siderable attention  in  Ward's  writings,  not  only  because  he  was 
interested  in  cosmic  evolution  and  found  in  the  state  a  problem  of 
origins,  but  also  because  he  was  a  firm  believer  in  the  ability  and 
necessity  of  governmental  interference  in,  and  control  of,  social 
evolution.  His  use  of  this  large  group  concept  requires  a  brief  treat- 
ment of  his  theory  of  the  origin  of  the  state  and  its  possible  functions. 

Ward's  treatment  of  the  origins  of  the  government  or  state  as 
given  in  Dynamic  Sociology  followed  consistently  the  logic  of  his 
individualistic  hypothesis.  Government  was  a  phase  of  the 
development  of  society.  The  primary  function  of  government  was 
protection,  which  became  essential  as  conflicts  between  individuals 
became  more  and  more  serious.  Society  was  the  necessary  result 
of  populousness  and  was  not  for  the  protection  of  individuals  as 
was  often  thought.  Society  is  the  result  of  blind  circumstance, 
not  at  all  due  to  design.  Government,  on  the  other  hand,  is  a 
product  of  genius,  an  invention.  Government  arose  for  protection 
against  the  conflicts  of  anti-social  beings.  Applying  his  idea  of 
aggregation.  Ward  finds  four  states  in  the  progress  of  social  aggre- 
gation. The  first  state  was  the  solitary  or  autarchic  stage,  which 
characterized  the  period  between  animals  and  human  beginnings. 
The  second  or  constrained  stage  is  represented  among  the  lowest 
existing  tribes.  It  shows  the  begmning  of  constraint  of  anti-social 
beings  into  some  kind  of  group  relations.  The  third  stage,  the 
national  or  politarchic,  is  the  present  one.  The  fourth  and  future 
stage,  the  pantarchic,  will  result  from  the  inevitable  conflicts  of  the 
present  national  stage,  thus  following  the  law  of  aggregation  to  its 
ultimate  mundane  limits.' 

"It  should  be  noted  that  Ward's  thinking  is  at  times  confused  by  his  use  of 
association  to  cover  both  those  facts  in  social  life  which  Maclver  in  his  Community 
has  distinguished  as  "community"  and  "association."  Community  is  defined  by 
Maclver  to  be  any  area  of  common  life,  or  town,  or  district,  or  country,  or  even 
wider  area.  An  association  is  an  organization  of  social  beings  for  the  pursuit  of  some 
common  interest  or  interests.  At  times  Ward  is  thinking  of  the  one  rather  than  the 
other  of  these  two  terms  and  falls  into  apparent  contradictions.  The  real  source  of 
confusion,  however,  seems  to  be  his  atomistic  prepossessions. 

'  Dynamic  Sociology,  I,  464-67. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"     299 

Government  was  an  invention  which  brought  some  order  into  a 
state  of  incessant  strife  and  conflict,  which  otherwise  would  have 
resulted  in  the  decimation  of  the  race.  Without  government  there 
could  have  been  no  society.  But  government,  being  an  invention, 
was  an  individual  product,  not  a  social  one,  and,  once  discovered, 
was  imposed  on  the  masses.  The  pohtical  history  of  the  past  has 
been  largely  the  history  of  attempts  of  the  few  to  impose  the 
burden  of  government  on  a  rebellious  people.  Progress  has  been 
along  the  Kne  of  removing  the  burden  of  government. 

With  the  further  details  of  his  theory  of  the  origin  of  govern- 
ment we  are  not  concerned.  The  theory  as  outlined  above  was 
largely  given  up  after  Ward  became  acquainted  with  Gumplowicz' 
group-conflict  theory,  which  Ward  adopted  as  the  most  important 
contribution  to  sociology: 

Gumplowicz  and  Ratzenhof er  have  abundantly  and  admirably  proved 
that  the  genesis  of  society  as  we  see  it  and  know  it  has  been  through  the  struggle 
of  races.  I  do  not  hope  to  add  anything  to  their  masterly  presentation  of 
this  truth,  which  is  without  question  the  most  important  contribution  thus 
far  made  to  the  science  of  sociology.  We  at  last  have  a  true  key  to  the  solu- 
tion of  the  question  of  the  origin  of  society.* 

In  his  subsequent  writings  he  utilized  the  group  conflict  as  the 
fundamental  concept  in  treating  of  the  origin  of  the  state  as  we 
now  know  it.^  Although  accepting  this  theory  he  did  not  alter 
his  earher  position  regarding  the  anti-social  nature  of  man.  On 
this  point  he  says  in  a  later  work: 

In  Dynamic  Sociology  I  took  strong  ground  against  the  Aristotelian  idea 
that  man  is  a  gregarious  animal  and  the  Comtean  doctrine  that  he  is  by  nature 
a  social  being,  and  pointed  out  a  large  number  of  what  I  called  "anti-social" 
qualities  in  his  nature,  and  I  also  worked  out  what  I  conceived  must  have 
been  the  several  steps  which  the  race  has  taken  in  its  passage  from  the  purely 

'  Pure  Sociology,  pp.  213-14. 

'  Ward,  however,  never  accepted  the  multiple  theory  of  the  origin  of  races  as 
did  Gumplowicz.  Positing  a  single  origin  of  the  human  race  he  then  finds  a  period 
in  which  disintegration  takes  place,  "they  soon  came  to  differ  in  all  their  details" 
(Pure  Sociology,  p.  201).  But  later  a  process  of  integration  began  in  which  group 
conflict  played  a  part.  It  is  at  this  period  of  development  that  he  would  utilize 
Gumplowicz'  theory.  It  is  interesting  to  note  that  it  was  Ward's  personal  contact 
with  Gumplowicz  that  caused  the  latter  to  abandon  his  theory  of  multiple  origins. 
See  GumploNvicz'  article  of  appreciation  of  Ward,  American  Journal  of  Sociology,  X 
(March,  1905),  643. 


300  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

animal  state  to  the  developed  social  state.  I  do  not  adhere  to  that  position 
now  merely  because  I  assumed  it  then,  but  rather  because,  notwithstanding 
the  little  real  evidence,  subsequent  indications  have  tended  to  confirm  it.  I 
will  here  emphasize  only  one  point.  Human  government  is  an  art  only  possible 
in  a  rational  being.  No  animal  possesses  a  government  in  any  such  sense. 
The  primary  object  of  government  is  to  protect  society  from  just  these  anti- 
social influences,  and  it  is  generally  admitted  that  without  it  society  could 
not  exist.  This  means  that  even  in  the  most  enlightened  peoples  the  anti- 
social tendencies  are  still  so  strong  that  they  would  disrupt  society,  but  for  an 
artificial  system  of  protection.  To  call  man  of  whom  this  can  be  said  a  social 
being  by  nature  is  obviously  absurd.  No  doubt  strong  social  impulses  exist 
among  men,  but  they  are  the  product  of  ages  of  constraint.  Man  may  be  in 
process  of  becoming  a  social  being,  but  he  will  not  have  really  become  such 
until  it  shall  be  possible  to  dispense  entirely  with  the  protective  function  of 
government.  Universal  education  and  further  centuries  of  custom  may 
ultimately  transform  human  character  to  this  extent,  until  habit  shall  become 
at  least  a  second  nature,  and  accomplish  the  same  result  that  natural  selec- 
tion has  accomplished  in  making  gregarious  animals  and  social  insects;  but 
thus  far  society,  which  is  the  product  of  the  collective  reason  working  for  its 
own  interests,  is  still  dependent  upon  the  momentary  exercise  of  that  reason 
in  preventing  its  own  overthrow.^ 

A  few  more  words  should  be  said  concerning  the  function  of  this 
large  group  organization  called  government.  Ward  was  careful 
to  distinguish  between  actual  government  in  the  past  and  possible 
government  in  the  future.  The  former  was  a  necessary  evil  as 
protective  device,  while  the  latter  is  an  art.  By  utilization  of  the 
principle  of  attractive  rather  than  repressive  legislation,  by  placing 
the  government  in  the  hands  of  social  scientists  as  an  instrumen- 
tality of  social  control,  it  could  be  made  the  chief  agency  in  direct- 
ing social  development  toward  desired  ends.  It  would  thus  become 
the  agency  whereby  the  psychic  factor  could  shape  the  group  life. 
Ward's  elaboration  of  this  form  of  group  activity  and  control  has 
made  him  one  of  the  most  inspiring  factors  in  the  development  of 
sociological  thought  in  America. 

For  the  purpose  of  paving  the  way  for  presenting  the  contrasts 
in  the  use  of  the  group  concept  as  between  Ward  and  contemporary 
sociology  in  the  United  States,  it  is  worth  while  to  take  up  Ward's 
discussion  of  the  nature  and  origin  of  religion,  of  morals,  of  language, 
and  of  the  human  mind.     These  will  bring  out  quite  clearly  the 

'  Ward,  Ouilincs  of  Sociology,  pp.  91-92. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"     301 

point  of  view  and  the  method  of  approach  of  the  contrasted  posi- 
tions.    The  four  problems  will  be  taken  in  order. 

Ward's  discussion  of  religion  is  one  of  the  stimulating  portions 
of  his  Dynamic  Sociology,  both  to  those  who  agree  with  him  and 
to  those  who  do  not.  We  are  not  concerned  with  the  merits  of  the 
controversy,  but  rather  with  the  way  in  which  he  accounts  for  the 
social  phenomena  which  are  grouped  under  the  term  religion. 
This  should  show  quite  clearly  and  concisely  the  way  in  which  he 
uses  or  fails  to  use  the  group  as  a  tool  of  thought  for  his  genetic 
account.  In  defining  his  term  religion,  after  reviewing  a  long  list 
of  proposed  definitions  by  various  writers,  he  adopts  Tylor's 
definition,  namely,  the  belief  in  spiritual  beings,  as  the  essential 
feature  of  the  term.^  This  definition  narrows  the  field  of  what 
most  sociologists  of  the  present  time  would  mean  by  the  same 
term.  In  itself  it  also  suggests  the  rational  approach  to  the 
religious  problem  which  was  characteristic  of  his  discussion,  as 
subsequent  references  will  show.  Not  only  is  religion  rational, 
and  thus  a  late  development,  but  it  is  also  an  individual  matter, 
coming  largely  from  the  achievements  of  more  brilliant  individual 
speculators  upon  the  mysterious  phenomena  of  human  environment 
and  human  subjective  experience.  The  presence  of  the  rational 
idea  in  Ward's  thought  is  illustrated  in  the  following  statement  of 
the  position  of  rehgion: 

Looking  back  now  over  the  whole  field,  there  remains  no  difficulty  in 
recognizing  the  true  position  of  religion  as  a  social  factor.  It  was  simply  a 
necessity  of  the  condition  of  things  that  it  should  have  come  into  existence 
as  it  has  done.  The  placing  of  a  rational  being  in  a  world  such  as  this  is 
constitutes  the  all-sufficient  explanation  of  the  development  of  a  religious 
sentiment  and  rehgious  institutions.  The  fact  was  pointed  out  with  some 
care  in  the  Introduction,  that  the  phenomena  of  the  imiverse  present  to  the 
imtaught  mind  a  maze  of  incomprehensible  data  for  speculation.  The  true 
nature  of  phenomena  can  only  be  known  after  ages  of  profound  scientific 

thought  and  labor Religion  owes  the  possibility  of  its  existence  to 

the  paradoxes  of  nature  ....  to  the  incontrovertible  fact  that  in  the  nature  of 
things  a  rational  being  must,  as  a  direct  and  inevitable  consequence  of  his 
rationality,  be  led  into  most  vital  errors,  for  which  he  must  further  be  deceived 
into  cherishing  the  most  intense  regard,  until,  by  the  slow  march  of  solid 

'  Dynamic  Sociology,  pp.  262-63. 


302  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

knowledge  and  the  ultimate  adoption  of  the  scientific  method  of  laborious 
research  and  crucial  tests,  truth  at  last  emerges  and  the  clouds  of  errors 
vanish.' 

In  pursuing  the  argument,  Ward  points  out  that  the  belief  in 
deities  was  a  part  of  the  speculative  efforts  of  seers  to  explain  the 
phenomena  of  nature  for  which  there  could  be  no  true  explanation. 
In  accounting  for  the  creation  of  deities  or  gods  or  spirits  he  accepts 
both  the  objective  and  the  subjective  explanations.  By  the  for- 
mer he  means  the  tendency  of  primitive  peoples  to  attribute  to 
phenomena  of  nature,  particularly  the  unusual  and  strange  events, 
their  own  characteristics.  By  the  subjective  origin  of  deities  he 
means  essentially  the  Spencerian  theory  of  deductions  based  on 
individual  experiences  such  as  dreams,  trances,  etc.^  It  is  only 
with  the  coming  of  the  scientific  method  and  point  of  view  that 
the  regular  and  non-spectacular  occurrences  of  nature  attract  the 
attention  of  the  student,  in  the  effort  to  explain  such  movements 
by  the  principle  of  law  rather  than  by  reference  to  an  erratic  unseen 
being.  Ward's  thought  in  this  respect  is  along  the  line  of  Spencer's 
statement  of  the  decreasing  province  of  the  unknown. 

This  summary  is  sufficient  for  the  purpose  of  showing  that 
Ward's  approach  to  the  problem  of  the  origin  of  religion  is  essentially 
individuaUstic.  The  group  finds  no  place  in  the  process  at  all. 
In  so  far  as  it  has  a  function,  it  is  merely  the  receptive  and  conserv- 
ing agency,  once  the  more  able  members  of  the  race  have  projected 
their  speculations.  Coming  after  the  developing  of  the  ''rational 
faculty"  religion  could  have  no  part  in  the  formation  of  that  part 
of  the  mind.  Being  essentially  a  philosophy  of  origins  based  on 
false  premises,  it  necessarily  acted  as  a  barrier  to  the  development 
of  science  and  truth,  and  is  bound  to  dissolve  as  each  of  its  preserves 
is  taken  away  by  scientific  explanations.  The  error  which  comes 
to  view  so  clearly  in  Ward's  discussion  of  this  particular  problem 
is  his  failure  to  utilize  the  group  as  the  center  of  his  thinking. 
The  contrast  between  the  modem  discussions  of  the  origin  and 
nature  of  religion  and  that  presented  by  Ward  is  essentially  that 
presented  by  the  use  of  the  group  concept  on  the  one  hand,  which 
implies  an  adequate  social  psychology,  and  the  neglect  of  the 

■  Dynamic  Sociology,  II,  270.  '  Ibid.,  263-64. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"     303 

group  concept  on  the  other  hand.'  Ward's  discussion  of  this 
particular  problem  reveals  very  clearly  his  need  of  the  group  con- 
cept in  his  thought,  and  the  difficulties  in  which  his  lack  of  it 
involved  him. 

Closely  allied  with  the  problem  of  the  origin  of  religion  is  that 
of  the  evolution  of  morals,  and  of  moral  codes.  Both  problems 
have  been  a  source  of  never-ending  speculation.  Like  the  problem 
of  religious  origins,  the  problem  of  morals  affords  an  opportunity 
to  bring  out  distinctly  the  extent  to  which  Ward  has  made  the 
most  of  the  group  as  a  concept  of  sociological  thought.  The 
contribution  of  sociology  to  ethics  rests  largely  upon  the  assumption 
of  the  group  approach  to  the  whole  moral  problem,  both  for  an 
explanation  of  the  origin  and  for  the  tests  of  validity  of  ethical 
codes.  We  shall  be  interested  chiefly  in  discovering  how  far 
Ward  has  gone  in  that  direction  rather  than  in  attempting  to 
set  forth  a  rounded  discussion  of  his  system  of  morals  as  he  has 
sketched  it  in  his  first  work. 

Ward  was  much  influenced  by  Spencer's  treatment  of  ethics 
from  the  utilitarian  standpoint.  Happiness  is  the  ultimate  end 
of  all  effort,^  whether  the  actor  be  an  individual  or  a  group.  Those 
acts  which  promote  the  greatest  happiness  in  general  are  good; 
those  which  do  not  are  bad.^  From  this  test  of  happiness  all 
acts  and  all  codes  must  find  their  final  moral  authority.  The 
absolute  systems  of  ethics  can  have  no  standing  except  in  so  far 
as  they  conform  to  the  fundamental  test  of  happiness.  In  that 
respect  Ward's  thinking  marks  a  step  away  from  the  theological 
systems  toward  a  more  pragmatic  theory  of  moral  criteria.  In 
general  his  system  shares  the  advantages  as  well  as  the  limitations 
of  the  utilitarian  school. 

Ward  recognized,  of  course,  that  certain  acts  of  man  as  well  as 
acts  of  animals  are  of  a  non-moral  nature.     Man's  acts  approach 

'  Space  prevents  a  discussion  of  the  way  in  which  the  growing  recognition  of  the 
group  and  the  use  of  an  adequate  social  psychology  have  changed  the  whole  religious 
perspective.  As  illustrations  of  the  point,  the  following  are  suggested:  King,  The 
Origin  and  Development  of  Religion;  Ames,  Psychology  of  Religion;  and  Coit,  The 
Soul  of  America.  The  contrast  between  these  books  and  Ward  is  too  apparent  to 
need  further  comment. 

'  Dynamic  Sociology,  II,  108,  ^  Ibid.,  133-34. 


304  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

those  of  animals  (i)  during  childhood,  (2)  in  idiocy,  and  (3)  in 
savagery.^  The  distinction  between  man's  acts  in  general  and 
those  of  animals  is  that  the  latter  are  impulsive  while  the  former 
are  rational.^  The  latter  spring  from  the  intellect  and  can  take  place 
only  after  the  intellect  has  been  evolved. 

In  so  far  as  man  is  concerned,  a  moral  situation  arises  when 
there  is  a  conflict  of  desires.  These  desires  may  be  either  internally 
or  externally  stimulated.  The  conflict  is  one  that  is  finally  settled 
by  the  triumph  of  the  strongest  desire  determined  on  a  pleasure- 
pain  basis.3 

In  other  words,  "Ethics  is  the  science  of  psychological 
mechanics."''  The  individual  reason  may  be  mistaken  in  its 
pleasure-pain  valuations,  but  once  the  reckoning  is  made,  it  acts 
on  that  line  which  apparently  offers  most  pleasure.  In  so  far  as 
a  moral  instinct  appears  like  the  social  instinct,  it  is  a  result  of  a 
conflict  of  desires^  nmning  through  a  long  period  of  history.  In 
tracing  the  genesis  of  sympathy  and  the  altruistic  attitude,  Ward 
shows  how  in  the  lower  stages  of  mental  development  the  egoistic 
attitude  and  egoistic  actions  predominate.  As  we  rise  in  the 
scale  of  mental  development  the  altruistic  interest  increases  in 
power  and  tends  more  and  more  to  control  conduct  as  civilization 
advances.^  The  savage  represents  a  stage  midway  between  the 
lower  forms  and  the  highest  forms  of  human  development.  This 
whole  progressive  movement  is  a  result  of  a  developing  intellect 
which  perceives  an  ever  wider  range  of  happiness,  including  the 
welfare  of  others  besides  the  actor.  In  developing  this  idea  of  the 
progressive  ascendancy  of  altruism  Ward  seems  to  be  following 
Comte,  whose  sociological  view,  according  to  one  writer,  has 
two  distinct  characteristics,  of  which  one  is  "that  it  takes  for 
granted  as  an  empirical  fact  the  existence  of  two  tendencies  in 
human  nature,  the  egoistic  and  the  altruistic,  of  which  the  latter, 
either  naturally  and  unconsciously  or  assisted  by  intellectual 
knowledge  and  control,  is  gradually  gaining  the  ascendancy  over 
the  former."' 

'  Dynamic  Sociology,  II,  331.  ilbid.,  328.  i  Ibid.,  I,  395. 

'  Ibid.,  329.  ■•  Ibid.,  328.  *  Ibid.,  II,  445-47- 

1  Merz,  History  of  European  Thought  in  the  Nineteenth  Century,  IV,  534.  The 
other  characteristic  referred  to  is  that  of  the  law  of  the  three  states. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  ''DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"    305 

Ward  recognized  the  fact  of  diversity  of  moral  codes  and  the 
consequent  fallibility  of  conscience.  Moral  codes  are  "built  up 
from  the  united  judgments  of  men  of  all  ages."^  These  codes  dis- 
play varying  degrees  of  perfection  both  as  to  their  content  and 
their  application.  But  all  moral  codes  and  rules  are  but  the 
reflection  of  the  actual  morals,  not  the  creators  of  them.  Since 
moral  action  depends  upon  intelligence,  the  real  moral  education 
is  the  education  of  intelligence,  the  education  of  information."  The 
surest  moral  guide  for  conduct  is  knowledge  of  the  relation  one 
sustains  to  his  fellows,  to  society,  and  to  the  world  in  general.^ 
Complete  knowledge  of  the  relative  competing  desires  would  lead 
inevitably  to  the  choice  of  the  good.^ 

Without  going  into  Ward's  discussion  further,  enough  has  been 
given  to  suggest  the  almost  complete  absence  of  the  group  as  a 
method  of  approach  to  the  moral  problem.  The  social  or  group 
approach  to  the  problems  of  morals  and  religion,  which  is  the 
central  method  in  contemporary  study  of  social  origins,  was  not 
present  in  his  treatment  of  either.  With  him  the  whole  problem  of 
the  origin  of  moral  codes  and  standards  was  solved  by  the  individual 
intellect  passing  upon  the  relative  worth  of  competing  desires, 
which  in  themselves  were  essentially  individual  phenomena.  On 
this  point  Ward  again  reveals  clearly  the  contrast  between  his 
fundamental  conception  and  that  of  the  newer  sociology.  The 
former  approaches  his  problem  from  an  individualistic  standpoint. 
The  group  is  nearly  ignored,  while  in  the  latter  the  group  is  the 
fundamental  concept  upon  which  the  sociological  structure  is  being 
reared.  It  goes  without  sa^dng,  almost,  that  Ward's  discussion  of 
morals  is  a  logical  result  of  his  individualistic  psychology.  The 
purpose  here  is  merely  to  point  out  the  fact  that  in  so  promising 
a  field  as  the  problem  of  the  evolution  of  morals,  Ward  almost 
completely  ignored  the  fundamental  tool — the  group  concept. 

Ward's  discussion  of  the  origin  and  significance  of  language  is  a 
defective  treatment  of  an  admittedly  difiicult  problem.     We  shall 

'  Dynamic  Sociology,  II,  144.  '  Ibid.,  360.  '  Ihid. 

<  Although  it  is  beside  our  problem,  it  is  interesting  to  note  that  Ward  always 
has  in  mind,  when  speaking  of  a  conflict  of  desires,  disjunctive  values  only.  That  is, 
the  choice  is  either  one  or  the  other.  He  never  considers  a  very  common  type  of 
valuation  problem  in  which  the  problem  is  that  of  reconstructing  the  whole  conflict 
situation  so  as  to  save  both  competing  values. 


3o6  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OP  SOCIOLOGY 

endeavor  to  discover  how  far  he  has  made  use  of  the  group  con- 
cept in  his  discussion  of  this  fundamental  factor  in  human  develop- 
ment. In  order  to  present  a  basis  for  certain  remarks  it  will  be 
well  to  summarize  briefly  his  theory  of  the  origin  of  language. 
Language  is  a  much  broader  term  than  speech.^  Language  is  the 
product  of  thought  and  includes  forms  of  communication  other 
than  speech.^  The  latter  is  a  "mode  in  which  language  presents 
itself  in  man  who  happens  to  possess  the  organs  which  render  it 
possible."^  "Language,  therefore,  includes  four  distinguishable 
forms  of  communication,  namely  gesture  language,  oral  speech, 
written  language,  and  printed  language."''  These  also  represent  an 
ascending  scale  of  evolutionary  progress  of  the  most  important 
kind.  The  course  of  evolution  from  the  lowest  to  the  highest 
form  of  commimication  was  a  gradual  and  natural  one.  Even  at 
that  point  where  the  psychic  phenomena  begin  there  could  be  no 
hiatus: 

If  at  this  particular  point  where  psychic  phenomena  begin  there  is  an 
absolute  break,  and  something  is  introduced  whose  elements  are  not  con- 
tained in  anything  that  preceded  it,  I  do  not  see  why  we  should  find  fault 
with  the  introduction  of  any  number  of  such  external  elements  or  factors, 
and  there  seems  to  be  no  reason  for  stopping  short  of  the  most  arbitrary 
theological  explanation  of  all  the  phenomena  of  the  universe.s 

One  might  say  in  passing  that  Ward  did  not  succeed  in  bridging 
that  gap  which  he  feared.  Admitting  the  pre-speech  type  of 
conununication  or  language,  which  is  called  the  gestural  form  of 
language,  he  furnished  no  process  or  explanation  of  the  process 
whereby  the  gestural  type  of  language  took  on  meaning,  and 
became  "significant."  Right  here  of  course  is  the  fundamental 
problem  of  social  psychology,  the  key  to  the  whole  problem  of 
the  origin  of  language,  of  mind,  and  all  that  those  terms  signify  in. 
human  evolution.  Ward  could  not  furnish  this  because  he  was 
involved  in  his  individualistic  prepossessions.  He  had  no  tools  of 
thought  or  analysis  by  which  he  could  save  himself  from  the  hiatus 
mentioned  above.  The  thing  that  he  lacked  was  the  group  concept 
as  the  starting-point  for  his  thinking  and  an  adequate  social  psy- 

»  Dynamic  Sociology,  II,  i8o.  » Ibid. 

» Ihid.  *  Ibid.  s  Pure  Sociology,  p.  123. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  ''DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY''     307 

chology  to  elucidate  the  process.  He  recognized,  of  course,  that  it 
would  be  wholly  impossible  for  a  *'race  leading  what  is  understood 
as  a  'solitary  life,  i.e.,  a  life  in  which  there  is  the  least  degree  of 
association  consistent  with  the  continuance  of  the  species,'  ever  to 
acquire  the  art  of  speech,"'  but  of  the  essentially  social  origin  of 
speech  through  the  process  of  stimulus  and  response  and  the 
resultant  development  of  meaning  he  was  entirely  unaware.  It 
remained  for  contemporary  social  psychology  to  fill  in  the  breach 
which  has  been  so  conspicuous  in  sociological  thought  even  up  to 
the  present  time.^ 

As  in  all  the  problems  of  origins  of  which  we  have  treated, 
Ward  falls  back  upon  the  development  of  individual  intelligence  as 
the  explanation  of  the  origin  of  speech  or  human  communication. 
The  individual  first  developed  intelligence  through  the  acquisition 
of  a  brain  and  then  proceeded  to  form  a  language.     As  he  stated  it : 

The  pressing  need  for  some  means  of  intercommunication  sufficiently 
accounts  for  the  development  of  language.  With  the  advance  of  brain  mass 
and  brain  structure,  there  grew  up  ideas  and  thoughts.  These  demanded 
expression  and  this  demand  constituted  a  new  set  of  desires.  The  same 
influence  which  created  these  new  desires  furnished  the  faculty  whose  exercise 
devised  the  means  for  their  satisfaction.  Thought  was  not  content  simply 
to  struggle  for  expression.  It  applied  the  indirect  method.  Unable  to  think 
in  such  a  manner  as  to  convey  the  nature  of  the  thought  directly  to  other 
minds,  it  devised  means  by  which  its  character  could  be  manifested  through 
the  physical  organs  of  the  body  in  such  a  way  as  to  affect  the  senses  of  others, 
and  be  conveyed  through  these  to  others'  minds.^ 

These  words  give  a  pretty  good  summary  of  Ward's  point  of 
view  upon  the  matter  now  imder  discussion.  He  assumes  the 
priority  of  the  individual  mind  which  has  thoughts  it  wants  to 
express.  The  group  comes  in  only  secondarily  as  furnishing  the 
field  for  the  expression  of  thoughts.  Of  the  fundamental  impor- 
tance of  the  group  in  creating  thought  and  mind,  Ward  has  no 

'  Dynamic  Sociology,  I,  454. 

*  The  point  suggested  in  the  paragraph  is  the  key  to  the  whole  criticism  which  I 
am  trying  to  make.  It  is  capable  of  wide  expansion  beyond  the  possible  limits  of  this 
part  of  the  discussion.  For  elucidation  I  refer  to  the  lectures  and  published  articles 
of  Professor  George  H.  Mead,  who  has  made  this  his  peculiar  contribution  to  the 
field  of  psychological  sociology. 

^  Dynamic  Sociology,  II,  182. 


3o8  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

conception.  The  position  which  he  takes  is  exactly  the  opposite 
of  that  of  modem  social  psychology.  In  other  words,  Ward  starts 
with  the  individual,  while  the  latter  starts  with  the  group.  Here 
again  we  see  the  pitfalls  into  which  the  lack  of  a  proper  under- 
standing of  the  group  as  the  fundamental  sociological  concept  led 
Ward.  He  could  give  us  no  adequate  account  of  the  origin  of 
language,  just  as  he  could  give  us  no  adequate  account  of  the  other 
human  phenomena,  partly  because  of  his  failure  to  grasp  the  signifi- 
cance of  the  group  as  the  starting-point  of  social  analysis. 

The  difl&culty  of  the  traditional  point  of  view  which  Ward 
followed  is  suggested  by  Ford  in  these  words: 

Even  those  who  adopt  the  Individual  Hypothesis  generally  admit  sodal 
conditions  as  a  proximate  phase  in  the  genesis  of  man.  But  if  the  argument 
employed  to  account  for  the  transition  from  an  unsocial  ape  to  a  social  man 
is  examined  it  is  found  logically  defective.  Reduced  to  its  simplest  form  it 
comes  to  this,  that  as  man  becomes  man  he  is  man.  The  formation  of  society 
is  attributed  to  perception  of  advantages  through  increased  mental  develop- 
ment. As  one  writer  of  this  school  puts  the  case,  it  dates  from  "the  dawn 
of  intellectuality."  What  caused  this  dawn?  The  affirmation  imputes  to 
the  antecedent  animal  species  a  specific  characteristic  of  the  human  species, 
and  is  a  case  of  reasoning  in  a  circle.  When  it  is  stated  that  man  was  not 
originally  a  social  animal,  but  that  later  on  man  engaged  in  social  intercourse, 
and  developed  speech,  a  primitive  condition  is  imputed  to  man  in  which  he 
covdd  not  have  become  man,  but  the  logical  hiatus  is  veiled  by  applying  the 
term  "man"  to  an  animal  of  specifically  different  character.  It  is  like  talking 
of  a  bird  that  did  not  originally  breathe  air  but  acquired  the  habit  through 
flight.  Homo  alalus,  or  speechless  man,  is  a  pseudo-concept.  Even  Haeckel, 
who  invented  the  term  to  indicate  a  hypothetical  phase  in  human  genesis, 
9a3rs, "  Man  originated  from  the  preceding  stage  in  consequence  of  the  gradual 
improvement  of  inarticulate  animal  sounds  into  true  articulate  speech." 
That  is  to  say,  man  did  not  precede  speech,  but  speech  preceded  man,  and  as 
speech  is  unquestionably  a  social  product,  the  formation  of  community  was  a 
condition  precedent  to  the  formation  of  the  himian  species.* 

The  discussion  of  the  problem  of  the  origin  of  language  leads 
directly  to  the  problem  of  the  origin  and  nature  of  the  mind, 
because  of  the  close  relation  of  the  two.  As  has  been  stated  above, 
Ward  assumed,  or  rather  attempted  to  prove,  the  development  of 
the  mind  as  the  precursor  of  language,  the  latter  being  an  inven- 

'  Ford,  Natural  History  of  the  State,  pp.  127-28,  The  reference  to  Ford  does  not 
imply  that  the  writer  of  this  paper  shares  Ford's  views  of  the  state  or  of  sociology. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"     309 

tion  of  the  mind  to  express  thoughts  and  ideas  which  already- 
existed.  In  that  respect  he  was  following  the  traditional  view 
which  prevailed  then  and  which  still  infests  a  good  deal  of  soci- 
ological theor^^  The  essential  factor  in  the  evolution  of  the  mind 
was  the  increased  brain  capacity  which  is  sufficient  to  explain  the 
whole  human  era  of  evolution: 

Without  inquiring  how  it  happened  that  the  creature  called  man  was 
singled  out  to  become  the  recipient  of  this  extraordinary  endowment,  we  may 
safely  make  two  fundamental  propositions,  which  tend  to  show  that  this 
question  is  not  as  important  as  it  seems.  The  first  is  that  if  the  developed 
brain  had  been  awarded  to  any  one  of  the  other  animals  of  nearly  the  same 
size  of  man,  that  animal  would  have  dominated  the  earth  the  same  way  that 
man  does.  The  other  is  that  a  large  part  of  what  constitutes  the  physical 
superiority  of  man  is  directly  due  to  his  brain  development.' 

The  way  in  which  the  brain  was  developed  through  the  process  of 
individual  survival  is  summarized  in  this  way: 

That  extraordinary  brain  development  which  so  exclusively  characterizes 
man  was  acquired  through  the  primary  principle  of  advantage.  Brain  does 
not  differ  in  this  respect  from  horns  or  teeth  or  claws.  In  the  great  struggle 
which  the  human  animal  went  through  to  gain  his  supremacy  it  was  brain 
that  finally  enabled  him  to  succeed,  and  under  the  biologic  law  of  selection, 
where  superior  sagacity  meant  fitness  to  survive,  the  human  brain  was  gradu- 
ally built  up  cell  upon  cell,  until  the  fully  developed  hemispheres  were  literally 
laid  over  the  primary  ganglia  and  the  cranial  walls  enlarged  to  receive  them.^ 

While  increase  of  brain  was  the  cause  of  so  many  qualities  which 
are  regarded  as  strictly  human,  Ward  recognized  that  it  was  also 
an  effect  of  the  tendency  of  human  beings  to  associate.  He  sug- 
gests, however,  that  this  tendency  to  associate  may  not  have  arisen 
until  after  the  brain  had  been  sufficiently  increased  by  other  causes 
to  enable  the  individuals  to  perceive  the  advantage  of  association.^ 
In  other  words,  as  shown  in  the  discussion  of  the  origin  of  society, 
the  group  enters  in  as  a  serious  factor  in  human  development 
only  after  there  had  been  a  considerable  development  of  the 
reflective  powers  of  man.  Once  that  stage  had  been  reached,  the 
social  factor  became  one,  and  possibly  the  most  important,  factor 

»  Pure  Sociology,  p.  67. 

'  Psychic  Factors  of  Civilization,  p.  262.  *  Dynamic  Sociology,  I,  438. 


310  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

in  future  development.  The  individual  gradually  becomes  trans- 
formed into  a  more  and  more  social  being,  but  always  starting  with 
a  considerable  development  of  what  is  called  mind  as  the  first 
step  in  the  series  of  development. 

In  general  it  may  be  said  that  both  phylogenetically  and 
ontogenetically  Ward  takes  the  mind  as  a  datum.  It  is  a  thing 
in  itself.  It  is  dependent  on,  a  function  of,  the  bram  mass,  but  it 
is  something  more.  It  has  an  existence.  It  is  an  entity.'  It  may 
be  developed  and  allowed  to  improve,  but  it  is  not  created  by  a 
social  environment.  The  group  merely  furnishes  the  material  upon 
which  it  may  work.  In  other  words,  his  psychological  view  was 
both  individualistic  and  non-functional.  To  illustrate  some  of 
the  indications  of  his  lunitations  with  particular  reference  to  the 
group  factor,  several  quotations  may  be  adduced.  These  are  drawn 
from  that  one  of  his  later  works  in  which  he  is  particularly  interested 
in  showing  the  fundamental  part  played  by  the  environment  in  the 
development  of  genius.  There,  if  anywhere,  one  would  expect  a 
correction  of  his  individuahstic  prepossessions.  Of  the  general 
relation  of  the  "mind"  to  environment  he  says: 

But  if  they  (natural  forces)  are  to  accomplish  anything  they  must  be 
freed.  It  is  the  same  with  the  forces  of  mind.  They  are  ever  pressing  and 
only  need  to  be  freed  in  order  to  achieve.  But  that  from  which  they  must 
be  freed  is  the  environment.  Tarde  was  right.  The  environment  represents 
opposition.  The  material  surroundings  are  perpetually  checking  and  repress- 
ing the  spontaneous  efforts  of  mind.* 

This  statement  shows  quite  clearly  the  psychology  running  through 
Ward's  thinking.  The  mind  to  him  is  a  thing  in  itself;  what  it 
needs  is  room  to  unfold.  The  self  is  given  as  an  imprisoned  power 
which  needs  but  to  be  freed.  It  may  be  stunted  and  maimed  by 
an  imfavorable  environment,  but  it  is  there  to  be  realized.  It 
might  be  objected  to  this  criticism  that  Ward  is  merely  creditmg 
each  biological  organism  with  the  characteristics  embodied  in  the 
germ  plasm,  which  are  the  energy  deposits  of  the  past  but  require 
a  favorable  nurture  before  they  can  survive  and  grow.     If  Ward 

'  In  a  later  book,  Psychic  Factors  of  Civilization,  pp.  225-26,  Ward  refers  to  the 
conception  of  the  mind  as  an  entity,  as  the  chief  error  in  social  thought.  His  own 
writings  confirm  his  judgment  in  this  respect. 

'  Applied  Sociology,  p.  128. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"     311 

means  no  more  than  that,  his  view  is  sound  so  far  as  it  goes.*  It 
stops  short  then,  however,  with  a  negative  interpretation  of  the 
development  of  the  mind  or  self.  It  fails  to  utilize  the  whole 
field  of  the  positive  development  of  the  mind  or  self  in  a  group  life. 
The  problem  is  more  than  one  of  removing  an  oppressing  environ- 
ment; it  is  the  problem  of  the  positive  creation  of  a  mind  through 
the  interstimulation  and  response  between  social  beings.* 

Speaking  further  of  the  importance  of  the  environment  in  social 
development,  Ward  says: 

The  real  question  is,  what  kind  of  minds  would  persons  thus  isolated 
have?  (That  is,  persons  shut  off  from  association.)  It  is  only  too  obvious 
that  their  minds  would  be  almost  completely  blank.  No  amount  of  native 
mental  capacity  could  prevent  this.  A  Bacon  or  a  Descartes,  if  made  the 
subject  of  such  an  experiment,  would  get  no  farther  than  one  of  moderate 
powers.  He  would  appear  to  ordinary  persons  a  fool.  Locke  was  right. 
Mind  without  experience  is  a  blank  sheet  of  paper  or  an  empty  cabinet.  The 
substratum  of  mind  is  nothing  until  it  is  supplied  with  something  to  exercise 
itself  upon.J 

This  statement  displays  a  pretty  clear  conception  of  the  sig- 
nificance of  what  has  been  called  social  inheritance,  or  knowledge, 
as  Ward  would  prefer  to  call  it.  Mind  is  still,  however,  a  thing 
which  comes  into  possession  of,  or  exercises  itself  upon,  external 

'  Since  the  criticism  attributes  no  exception  to  Ward's  whole  viewpoint  there 
is  no  reason  to  believe  that  the  criticism  does  him  an  injustice.  He  is  thinking  of 
the  "mind,"  not  the  germ  plasm. 

'The  criticism  of  Ward's  general  position  is  suggested  in  the  following  brief 
quotation  from  Dewey:  "Speaking  in  general  terms,  there  is  no  more  a  problem  of 
the  origin  of  society  than  there  is  of  the  origin  of  chemical  reactions ;  things  are  made 
that  way.  But  a  certain  kind  of  associated  or  joint  life  when  brought  into  being  has 
an  unexpected  by-product — the  formation  of  those  peculiar  acquired  dispositions, 
sets,  attitudes,  which  are  termed  mind.  This  by-product  continually  gains  in  rela- 
tive importance.  It  increasingly  becomes  the  significant  acquisition  among  all  the 
varied  reorganizations  of  native  tendencies.  That  anything  which  may  properly  be 
called  mind  or  intelUgence  is  not  an  original  possession  but  is  a  consequence  of  the 
reorganization  of  instincts  under  the  conditions  supplied  by  associated  life  in  the 
family,  in  the  schools,  in  the  market  place,  and  the  forum,  is  not  remote  inference 
from  a  speculative  reconstruction  of  the  mind  of  primitive  man;  it  is  a  conclusion 
confirmed  by  the  development  of  specific  beliefs,  ideas,  and  purposes  in  the  life  of 
every  infant  now  observable." — "Need  for  Social  Psychology,"  Psychological  Review, 
XXIV,  272. 

^Applied  Sociology,  p.  270. 


312  TEE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

objects.  Ward  has  no  psychology  by  which  to  explain  the  process 
of  the  development  of  the  self.  His  persons  are  still  isolated 
individuals  which  appropriate  knowledge.  The  mechanical  nature 
of  the  educational  process  is  illustrated  by  his  use  of  the  box 
analogy.  According  to  this  analogy,  the  brain  is  a  kind  of  recep- 
tacle into  which  knowledge  enters  as  a  content.  The  boxes  may 
be  of  varied  quality;  some  of  mahogany,  some  inlaid  with  precious 
stones,  while  others  are  of  cheaper  material  down  to  the  very 
poorest  strawboard  incapable  of  holding  anything.  The  varied 
boxes,  except  the  very  poorest,  are  capable  of  holding  the  same 
contents,  the  greatest  truths  ever  discovered.  A  mahogany  box 
with  poor  contents  is  inferior  to  a  cruder,  less  perfect  box  with 
better  contents.  The  contents  are  knowledge,  the  acquired 
qualities.  The  mind  is  represented  by  both  the  box  and  its  con- 
tents. Ward's  educational  program  rested  upon  the  problem  of 
bringing  the  mind,  the  knower,  into  possession  of  truths  to  be 
known,  the  problem  of  epistemology. 

The  criticism  to  be  made  against  Ward's  position  is  not  to 
question  his  appreciation  of  the  part  played  by  accumulated 
human  experience  in  the  development  of  people,  nor  of  the  part 
played  by  environment  and  opportunity  in  the  creation  of  diver- 
sities in  achievement.  His  criticism  of  the  hereditarians  was 
sound,  yet  his  approach  remained  essentially  individualistic,  on 
account  of  his  lack  of  an  adequate  social  psychology.  In  other 
words,  he  possessed  no  basic  process  by  which  he  could  explain 
the  essentially  social  nature  of  the  mind  even  if  he  had  so  desired. 
His  individualistic  approach  to  the  whole  problem  of  evolution 
precluded  an  adequate  grasp  of  the  essence  of  his  problem.  He 
was  unconscious  of  the  essential  place  of  the  group  in  sociology. 

Before  leaving  the  study  of  Ward's  sociology  in  relation  to  the 
group  concept,  attention  must  be  called  to  the  fact  that  those 
important  groups,  which  have  been  called  the  primary  groups, 
receive  practically  no  attention  in  Dynamic  Sociology.  More 
attention  was  given,  as  pointed  out  above,  to  the  larger  political 
groupings  such  as  society  and  the  state.  The  small  groups  such 
as  the  family,  the  neighborhood,  the  "borough,"  the  community, 
have  come  to  be  recognized  as  fundamental  and  primary  in  their 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  ''DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY''    313 

relation  to  human  behavior.  In  comparison  with  these  local 
groupings,  including  the  occupational  groups,  the  larger  political 
units  are  relatively  unimportant.  Ward  did  not  perceive  the 
significance  of  the  smaller  groups  as  factors  in  the  development  of 
human  nature,  and  in  social  control.  In  other  words  he  failed  to 
use  the  group  concept  at  the  most  vital  part  of  social  analysis. 
His  thinking  was  that  of  an  individuaHstic  biologist  attempting  to 
create  a  sociology  without  the  group  as  its  chief  comer  stone. 

In  his  conception  of  evolution  his  unit  was  the  individual.  The 
individual  carried  on  and  was  the  end  of  the  selective  process. 
The  struggle  was  always  an  individual  one.  The  individual  side  of 
the  process  was  stressed  to  the  neglect  of  the  factor  of  co-operation 
as  a  concomitant  of  all  struggle  and  as  a  serviceable  characteristic. 
The  place  of  the  group  unit  in  the  evolutionary  process  is  suggested 
by  Darwin.^    Macfarlane  expresses  the  same  view: 

We  accept  it  then,  as  a  proven  principle  amongst  animals  lower  than  man, 
that  the  co-operative  or  social  plan  has  ever  tended  to  evolve  and  select  forms 
which  have  possessed  resulting  advantages  over  the  competitive  plan  and 
that  such  caused  them  to  become,  in  spite  of  their  apparent  weakness,  truly 
dominant  groups  alike  in  high  organization,  in  capacity  for  defence,  and  in 
reproductive  capacity.  So  it  is  safe  to  say  that,  for  every  individual  which 
lives  a  keenly  competitive  life,  a  dozen  can  be  found  that  are  imited  in  such 
social  activities  and  in  general  provision  for  the  species  that  the  common 
welfare  of  each  individual  is  nearly  always  assured.  Furthermore,  with 
advancing  mentality  and  social  organization  this  principle  is  the  more  per- 
fectly exhibited.^ 

Baldwin  refers  to  the  factor  of  the  group  in  the  process  of 
evolution  in  similar  words,  emphasizing  the  group  side  which  Ward 
did  not  sufiiciently  appreciate.     He  says: 

This  gives,  as  I  conceive  it,  a  sort  of  selection  and  survival  which  is  quite 
different  from  that  recognized  in  the  strictly  biological  sciences.  We  find 
that  the  utility  to  be  subserved  is  one  of  conscious  co-operation  and  union 
among  individuals;  and  the  unit  whose  selection  is  to  secure  this  utility  must 
have  the  corresponding  characters.  This  unit  is  not  the  individual  but  a 
group  of  individuals  who  show  in  common  their  gregarious  or  social  nature  in 
actual  exercise;  each  is  selected  in  company  with  certain  others,  who  survive 
with  him  and  for  the  same  reason.    Thus   the  selective   unit,   considered 

'  Descent  of  Man,  chaps,  iii,  v. 

'  Macfarlane,  The  Causes  and  Course  of  Organic  Evolution,  p.  776. 


314  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

from  the  external  or  social  point  of  view  is  a  group  of  individuals,  greater  or 
smaller  as  the  utility  subserved  may  require;  and  from  the  point  of  view  of 
the  subjective  or  psychic  process  it  implies  the  mental  attitude  which  brings 
the  individual  into  useful  co-operation.  Calling  this  latter  the  "personal" 
aspect  of  social  fitness,  we  may  define  it  by  using  the  term  "socius."  The 
psychological  unit  is  a  socius,  a  more  or  less  socialized  individual,  fitted  to 
enter  into  fruitful  social  relations.  And  the  objective  requirement  remains 
that  of  a  group  of  such  individuals  making  up  a  social  situation.  These  two 
conceptions,  then,  become  the  watchwords  of  our  evolutionary  social  psy- 
chology and  sociology  respectively — the  "socius"  and  the  "social  situation."^ 

Ward's  failure  to  use  the  group  concept  in  his  account  of  evo- 
lution is  but  one  of  the  defects  which  we  have  seen  to  foUow  from 
his  individuahstic  point  of  view.  The  group,  as  the  fundamental 
fact  in  sociology,  had  not  yet  been  discovered  at  the  time  Ward's 
system  was  built  up,  consequently  it  assumed  only  a  secondary 
and  insignificant  place  in  his  thinking.  To  what  extent  contem- 
porary sociology  has  reversed  his  method  of  approach  will  be  the 
question  that  will  occupy  the  next  chapter. 

'  Baldwin,  Darwin  and  the  Humanities,  p.  43.  ' 

[To  he  continued\ 


PROGRESS  IN  PHILADELPHIA 


CLINTON  ROGERS  WOODRUFF 

Philadelphia 


For  many  years  (since  1854),  Philadelphia's  governmental 
machinery  was  burdened  by  a  double-chambered  legislature  of 
146  members — 48  in  the  upper  branch  and  98  in  the  lower,  making 
it  one  of  the  largest  of  its  kind  not  only  in  America  but  in  the 
world.  To  expect  satisfactory  results  from  such  a  body  modeled 
on  the  federal  plan  of  government  was  to  expect  the  impossible. 
It  made  ''organization  "  or  "boss"  control  necessary  and  inevitable. 
In  191 9,  as  a  consequence  of  years  of  incessant  agitation  and 
activity,  a  new  charter  was  granted  the  city  by  the  state  legislature 
which  represented  a  victory  for  strong,  simple,  representative 
government,  thus  fairly  completing  the  great  movement  begun 
in  1900  at  Galveston.  The  outstanding  achievement  of  this  new 
charter,  which  by  the  way  is  a  model  of  conciseness,  consisting  of 
23,282  words  and  likewise  a  model  of  admirable  draftsmanship, 
is  a  small  council  of  twenty-one.  The  members  receive  a  living 
wage  in  the  shape  of  an  annual  salary  of  $5,000.  The  members 
of  the  old  council  served  without  pay — from  the  city.  In  some 
instances  they  held  other  administrative  offices,  mostly  under 
the  county  government;  sometimes  a  federal  office;  sometimes 
in  an  important  corporation.  Practically  all  of  them  were  in  a 
positon  where  strong  outside  influence  could  be  brought  to  bears 
upon  them  if  they  showed  signs  of  dangerous  or  embarrassing 
independence. 

Under  the  new  charter  the  councilmen  are  elected  for  a  term 
of  four  years  from  the  eight  senatorial  districts  which  are  as  nearly 
homogeneous  and  compact  as  it  is  possible  to  make  political 
subdivisions. 

We  now  have  a  South  Philadelphia  district,  a  West  Philadel- 
phia one,  a  northeastern  district,  a  central  district,  a  German- 
town  district,  and  so  on  through  the  list,  all  with  substantially 

3^5 


3i6  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

similar  needs  and  composition.  There  is  at  least  one  councilman 
from  each  district  and  one  additional  councilman  for  each  20,000 
assessed  voters.  So  as  to  keep  the  council  small,  and  as  a  recog- 
nition of  coming  events,  the  charter  contains  an  interesting 
provision  that  "if  at  any  time  hereafter  the  women  of  the  Common- 
wealth shall  be  given  the  right  to  vote,  the  unit  of  representation 
shall  be  40,000  assessed  voters  instead  of  20,000,  so  that  the  council 
shall  continue  to  be  composed  of  twenty-one  members. " 

One  of  the  arguments  most  frequently  urged  for  a  small,  compact 
municipal  legislature  has  been  the  facilities  it  affords  the  voter  to 
understand  his  government  and  run  it  directly  without  the  inter- 
vention of  a  great  corps  of  practical  politicians.  While  advocating 
the  charter  before  the  people  of  Philadelphia  it  was  maintained 
that  such  a  body  would  constitute  a  form  of  representative  govern- 
ment which  the  voters  themselves  could  handle  with  a  minimum 
of  political  organization.  My  gratification  can  be  easily  imagined 
when  I  read  that  Congressman  Vare,  one  of  the  two  brothers  at  that 
time  controlling  the  political  organization  in  Philadelphia,  declared 
before  the  Young  Republican  Club:  "Abolish  councils  and  you 
lose  your  trained  politicians;  and  if  that  happens  where  will  we 
ever  get  a  candidate  for  mayor?"  Certainly  our  experience  with 
mayors  for  some  years  prior  to  the  new  charter  had  been  such  as  to 
contemplate  such  a  possibility  with  a  considerable  degree  of 
equanimity ! 

To  be  sure  it  is  too  soon  to  speak  with  positiveness  as  to  the 
extent  to  which  anticipations  have  been  met,  but  it  is  a  fair  question 
to  ask,  "To  what  extent  has  the  new  council  made  good  during 
the  first  six  months  of  its  operation?"  It  is  equally  fair  to  reply 
that  the  results  thus  far  have  not  been  such  as  to  make  the  advocates 
of  the  charter  unduly  proud.  At  the  same  time,  for  one  I  believe 
that  the  new  provisions  represent  the  embodiment  of  the  represen- 
tative district,  the  substitution  of  an  effective  instrument  for  a 
clumsy  one,  and  the  establishment  of  a  legislative  body  that  will 
in  time  become  not  only  a  real  policy-determining  body,  but  the 
basis  of  a  city-administrator  form  of  government.  I  hesitate  to 
use  the  term  **city  manager"  for  that  might  be  too  considerable 
of  a  jolt.  It  is  inevitable  though  that  development  of  public 
opinion  along  those  lines  is  in  order,  as  I  shall  hope  to  show  later. 


PROGRESS  IN  PHILADELPHIA  317 

No  one  can  maintain,  successfully,  that  the  new  council  is 
boss-ridden.  It  certainly  has  made  discussion  possible  and  inevi- 
table. It  is  no  longer  a  mere  machine  for  the  registering  of  the 
previously  determined  will  of  an  organization.  It  embodies  an 
opportunity  for  the  people  to  express  their  wishes  if  they  desire. 
It  abolishes  dual  office-holding  in  the  legislative  body,  which  for  a 
generation  had  been  the  corner  stone  of  "organization"  control  of 
councils  and  a  curse  and  an  obstacle  of  great  resistance  to  forward 
movements.  Now  no  person  may  hold  the  office  of  councilman 
while  holding  any  other  office,  position,  or  employment  of  profit 
under  the  city,  county,  or  state  and  no  councilman  shall  be  eHgible 
to  any  office  under  the  city  during  the  term  for  which  he  shall  have 
been  elected.  This  means  much  in  the  way  of  political  freedom, 
for  coimcilmen  are  no  longer  compelled  to  serve  two  masters. 

Incidentally  it  is  interesting  to  note  that  the  bicameral  council 
is  happily  almost  extinct,  only  Baltimore,  Atlanta,  and  Kansas  City 
among  the  larger  cities  of  the  coimtry  continuing  them.  There 
are  also  a  few  New  England  towns  which  cling  to  the  federal  plan — 
but  all  these  are  doomed,  as  the  movement  for  simplified  local 
government  continues  on  its  triumphant  way. 

In  estimating  the  advantages  of  the  new  council,  the  breaking 
down  of  the  influence  of  the  ward  must  not  be  overlooked.  Many 
of  the  wards  have  not  been  changed  since  the  year  of  consolidation 
(1854).  Consequently  in  the  old  bicameral  body  they  continued 
to  exercise  the  same  influence  as  when  the  first  alignment  was  made. 
This  was  manifestly  unfair  as  it  gave  wards  with  less  than  1,000 
registered  voters  the  same  weight  in  the  upper  branch  as  the 
newer  wards  with  15,000  to  18,000  registered  voters.  The  sena- 
torial districts  are  not  only  more  homogeneous  but  have  been  more 
frequently  rearranged.  Moreover,  the  establishment  of  a  quota 
for  representation  makes  it  possible  for  those  districts  which 
increase  their  population  between  reapportionment  periods  to 
secure  the  additional  representation  to  which  their  increased 
population  entitles  them. 

Coupled  with  this  prohibition  of  dual  office-holding  in  the  new 
charter  is  a  modern  civil  service  chapter  introducing  up-to-date 
methods  of  selecting  public  employees  on  a  basis  of  merit  admin- 
istered by  a  commission  elected  by  the  council  instead  of  appointed 


3i8  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

by  the  mayor,  the  chief  appointing  power  in  the  city.  The  com- 
mission chosen  by  the  council  at  its  organization  entered  upon  the 
discharge  of  its  highly  important  duties  with  a  full  realization  of 
the  employment  problems  involved.  It  has  begun  the  classifi- 
cation and  standardization  of  the  approximately  15,000  positions, 
an  obligation  imposed  upon  it  by  the  charter.  This  work  will  be 
completed  in  time  to  be  available  for  the  mayor's  use  in  the  prep- 
aration of  the  budget,  which  the  new  charter  requires  him  to 
make.  It  is  the  hope  and  ambition  of  the  Civil  Service  Com- 
mission that  in  time  the  council,  the  administrative  branches, 
and  the  people  generally  will  come  to  regard  its  work  as  that  of 
the  city's  employment  agency  and  as  the  means  for  placing  public 
service  upon  a  dignified,  honorable,  and  useful  basis. 

Philadelphia's  commission  aims  to  find  a  substitute  for  the  term 
"Civil  Service  Examination,"  which  has  proved  a  positive  hin- 
drance to  the  cause  of  the  merit  system.  Its  connotation  is  certainly 
most  unfortunate.  To  most  people  it  suggests  a  classroom  ordeal 
in  which  one's  chances  of  survival  vary  in  inverse  ratio  to  the  length 
of  time  he  has  been  out  of  school  or  college.  It  is  quite  to  be 
expected,  therefore,  that  any  proposal  to  fill  high-grade  positions 
in  the  public  service  by  civil  service  methods  should  meet  at  first 
with  a  considerable  degree  of  skepticism  in  many  quarters. 

In  a  striking  leaflet  entitled  How  Far  Can  Civil  Service  Go, 
the  Philadelphia  Bureau  of  Municipal  Research  "confesses  that 
at  this  time  it  is  unable  to  think  of  a  more  suitable  term.  It 
throws  some  additional  light  upon  the  real  nature  of  an  up-to-date 
civil  service  examination  and  thus  helps  to  introduce  a  new  meaning 
into  an  old  term.  The  more  progressive  civil  service  commissions 
have  long  ceased  to  rely,  to  any  appreciable  extent,  on  the  somewhat 
academic  test  used  so  largely  in  the  early  days  of  the  merit  system. 
They  now  use  a  series  of  different  tests  of  a  very  practical  character 
designed  to  gauge  different  qualifications  and  appropriate  for  the 
filling  of  different  types  of  positions.  Carj)enters  and  painters, 
for  example,  are  no  longer  asked  when  Columbus  discovered 
America.  They  are  required  to  demonstrate  their  skill  by  doing 
an  actual  job  of  carpentering  or  paintLng.  Applicants  for  high- 
grade  professional,  technical,  or  administrative  positions,  m  like 


PROGRESS  IN  PHILADELPHIA 


319 


manner,  are  no  longer  quizzed  in  schoolroom  fashion  with  regard 
to  textbook  facts.  They  are  invited  to  enter  a  dignified  competition 
in  which  their  past  career  and  their  personality  are  determining 
factors  rather  than  any  feat  of  memory.  In  examinations  of  this 
character,  applicants  frequently  never  meet  together  in  a  single 
room,  but  prepare  their  statements  of  training  and  experience  in 
their  own  private  offices  or  in  their  homes  and  send  them,  together 
with  any  books  or  articles  they  may  have  published,  to  the  civil 
service  commission  by  mail.  In  addition  they  may  be  asked  to 
discuss  in  writing  some  important  technical  or  administrative 
problem,  which  may  also  be  delivered  through  the  mails.  All  of 
these  evidences  of  the  qualifications  of  the  various  applicants  are 
rated  by  a  board  of  special  examiners  who  themselves  are  profes- 
sional men  or  have  had  long  experience  ia  the  kind  of  work  for 
which  the  examination  is  held.  Those  applicants  who  receive  a 
passing  mark  in  this  part  of  the  test  may  then  be  summoned  before 
the  special  examining  board  for  a  personal  interview  in  order  that 
their  personal  qualifications  may  also  be  taken  into  account. 
Finally,  the  grades  for  the  various  parts  of  the  test  are  averaged 
and  the  successful  applicants  are  placed  on  a  list  of  eligibles  in 
the  order  of  their  ratmg.  In  civil  service  parlance,  this  is  what  is 
known  as  the  "unassembled  examination." 

It  is  no  longer  necessary  to  argue  the  efficacy  of  this  kind  of  test. 
It  sounds  like  a  sensible  method,  and  experience  has  demonstrated 
over  and  over  again  that  it  produces  results.  Many  important 
public  posts  with  salaries  ranging  from  $3,000  to  $10,000  have 
been  filled,  not  only  by  the  federal  Civil  Service  Commission,  but 
by  state  and  local  commissions  as  well.  Men  of  high  standing  and 
national  reputation  have  not  hesitated  to  enter  an  examination 
when  conducted  on  such  a  dignified  plane.  It  has  been  possible, 
moreover,  for  persons  living  in  entirely  different  parts  of  the 
country  to  compete. 

In  view  of  the  success  of  this  improved  type  of  civil  service 
examination  is  there  any  good  reason,  the  bureau  most  pertinently 
asks,  why  we  should  not  proceed  with  confidence  to  extend  the 
merit  system  just  as  high  up  in  the  ser\dce  as  the  present  law 
permits  us  to  go  ?    By  so  doing  we  shall  take  a  long  step  toward 


320  TEE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

making  public  service  not  merely  a  blind-alley  employment  but  a 
dignified  and  honorable  career. 

This  new  charter  not  only  makes  all  this  possible,  but  it  deals 
in  an  up-to-date  way  with  the  highly  important  question  of  pro- 
motion within  the  municipal  service.  One  of  the  new  city  ofi&cials 
came  out  in  opposition  to  the  proposal  of  the  civil  service  com- 
mission that  city  employees  should  be  promoted  in  the  order  of 
merit  as  determined  by  a  competitive  promotion  examination,  a 
limited  choice  (the  first  two  on  the  list)  being  permitted  from 
among  those  having  the  highest  rating.  His  argument  was  that  an 
employee's  fitness  for  promotion  can  be  determined  better  by  his 
superior  than  by  a  civil  service  examination.  As  the  Philadelphia 
Bureau  of  Municipal  Research  observed,  there  is  nothing  at  all 
novel  either  in  the  proposal  of  the  commission  or  in  the  argument 
of  the  protesting  new  official.  WTierever  an  effort  has  been  made 
to  insure  to  the  young  men  and  women  of  the  cormnunity  an 
opportunity  for  a  career  in  the  public  service,  a  rule  similar  to  the 
one  adopted  by  the  Philadelphia  civil  service  commission  has  been 
followed.  In  such  cities  as  New  York,  Chicago,  Buffalo,  San  Fran- 
cisco, and  Cleveland;  and  in  such  states  as  Ohio,  New  Jersey, 
New  York,  and  California,  employees  in  the  service  are  given  a 
reasonable  assurance  that  promotion  will  be  according  to  merit  by 
requiring  that  when  an  appointing  officer  wants  to  make  a  pro- 
motion he  must  select  one  of  the  three  persons  whose  names  stand 
highest  on  the  list  of  eligibles.  It  would  be  well,  as  the  bureau 
says,  "for  this  new  official  who  made  his  protest  against  the  pro- 
motion rule  to  wait  until  he  has  an  opportunity  of  observing  its 
results.  He  may  find  the  promotion  examination  a  much  better 
instrument  of  selection  than  he  ever  dreamed  it  to  be.  As  a  matter 
of  fact  the  promotion  rule  in  effect  in  Philadelphia  during  a  con- 
siderable period  just  prior  to  191 6  was  essentially  the  same  as  the 
one  now  under  consideration,  and  the  results  during  that  period 
appear  to  have  been  highly  satisfactory." 

Political  activity  of  any  kind  and  payment  of  political  contribu- 
tions by  policemen  and  firemen  are  made  misdemeanors  punishable 
by  fine  and  imprisonment  under  the  new  charter,  and  those  con- 
victed of  such  practices  are  debarred  from  office-holding  for  a 


PROGRESS  IN  PHILADELPHIA  321 

period  of  two  years.  Moreover,  any  taxpayer  may  bring  pro- 
ceedings to  have  the  employment  of  the  offender  declared  illegal 
"and  to  restrain  payment  of  compensation  to  him,  a  powerful  lever 
for  the  effective  enforcement  of  the  law. 

As  orginally  introduced  the  charter  bill  made  political  activity 
on  the  part  of  any  city  or  county  employee  punishable  not  only 
by  dismissal  but  also  by  fine  and  imprisonment;  and  the  enforce- 
ment of  this  provision  was  strengthened  by  giving  any  taxpayer 
the  right  to  go  into  court  and  by  writ  of  mandamus  to  compel 
dismissal.  Under  the  charter  as  passed,  however,  only  policemen 
and  firemen  engaging  in  political  activity  are  to  be  punished  by 
fine  and  imprisonment  and  may  be  dismissed  by  taypayer's  action. 
The  sole  punishment  of  other  city  employees  is  dismissal  from  the 
service,  and  it  is  not  made  enforceable  by  a  taypayer's  action. 

These  provisions,  however,  represent  long  steps  forward,  and 
while  there  are  those  who  wanted  all  office-holders  placed  in  the 
same  category,  the  most  dangerous,  the  police  and  the  firemen 
are  taken  completely  out  of  politics.  This  again  represents  the 
triumph  of  a  generation's  effort.  The  significance  of  the  gain  is 
fully  appreciated  when  one  recalls  the  notorious  Fifth  Ward  scandal 
of  191 7,  where  gunmen  imported  from  New  York  operated  under 
police  protection  to  carry  a  ward  and  succeeded  in  murdering  a 
policeman  who  was  courageously  trying  to  do  his  duty.  For  years 
one  of  the  chief  obligations  laid  upon  a  Philadelphia  policeman 
had  been  to  serv^e  his  political  sponsors. 

In  commenting  on  this  liberating  feature  of  the  new  charter, 
the  North  American  said: 

The  criminal  classes  and  large  number  of  the  foreign-born  population  have 
been  voted  under  police  control,  being  corrupted  by  grants  of  immunity 
from  prosecution  for  law-breaking  or  coerced  by  threats  of  punishment.  The 
murderous  political  outrages  perpetrated  in  the  Fifth  Ward  in  September,  1917, 
when  an  uncorrupted  policeman  was  killed  and  public  officials  were  assaulted 
by  imported  gunmen,  aroused  a  public  sentiment  which  demanded  a  sweeping 
away  of  the  atrocious  system, 

Philadelphia  is  now  in  a  position  where  she  can  depend  upon 
her  policemen  to  do  police  work  and  leave  politics  alone,  likewise 
her  firemen.  Thus  the  power  and  psychology  of  the  uniformed 
office-holder  bids  fair  to  become  a  thing  of  the  past.    Per  contra 


322  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

a  new  look  of  independence  and  efficiency  is  coming  into  the  eyes 
of  policemen  and  firemen.  They  are  beginning  to  realize  and 
appreciate  at  its  real  value  that  they  are  public  servants  and  not 
slaves  of  selfish  political  interests. 

In  the  platform  upon  which  Hon.  J.  Hampton  Moore  was 
elected,  the  first  mayor  of  Philadelphia  under  the  new  charter, 
there  was  this  plank : 

Second.  Contractor  rule.  For  many  years  Philadelphia  has  been  mis- 
governed by  a  contractors'  combine;  public  officials  have  been  selected  and 
appointed  by  contractors  who  take  enormous  profits  from  the  city  treasury. 
There  can  be  no  condemnation  too  severe  for  a  system  whereby  a  politician 
nominates  and  elects  the  officer  of  a  city,  who,  in  turn,  awards  valuable  contracts 
to  him  and  oversees  his  work.  The  result  is  an  increase  in  taxes  and  the 
waste  of  public  money.  Out  of  these  profits  a  vast  corruption  fund  is  created 
which  is  used  to  bribe  and  intimidate  voters  and  win  elections  for  the  con- 
tractor's candidates.  This  condition  is  intolerable,  and  any  candidate  put 
forward  by  the  contractor  interests  must  be  opposed  and  defeated,  however 
respectable  he  may  appear  to  be. 

For  a  full  generation  Philadelphia  had  "contractor  rule"  or 
"rule  by  contractors,"  whichever  way  one  may  choose  to  put  it. 
The  same  set  of  men  secured  the  contracts  and  were  potential  in 
selecting  those  who  had  supervision  of  them.  Certainly  a  nice 
arrangement — for  the  contractors  who  seem  to  have  profited 
greatly  by  the  arrangement,  both  politically  and  in  fine  houses 
and  fine  raiment  and  in  substantial  bank  accounts.  During  the 
mayoralty  campaign  of  191 1  the  Philadelphia  Record  declared  that 
one  of  the  contractor  bosses  was  worth  at  least  three  millions  of 
dollars,  and  I  do  not  recall  that  the  editor  has  withdrawn  the 
statement. 

In  commenting  on  this  situation  Public  Works  (formerly  known 
as  The  Municipal  Journal)  pointed  out  that  it  is  not  necessarily 
objectionable  from  the  citizens'  and  taxpayers'  standpoint  to  have 
such  work  done  by  contract  but 

in  this  particular  case  the  awarding  of  contracts  for  these  purposes  has  become 
one  of  the  greatest  municipal  disgraces  to  be  found  in  the  country.  Each  of 
these  services  requires  an  enormous  equipment  for  a  city  as  large  as  Phila- 
delphia, while  the  disposing  of  the  garbage  requires  a  very  expensive  plant, 
which,  if  not  used  for  this  purpose,  is  of  practically  no  value  for  sale  or  other 
use;  and  yet  it  had  become  the  practice  to  delay  advertising  these  contracts 


PROGRESS  IN  PHILADELPHIA  323 

until  a  very  few  weeks  before  the  letting  (sometimes  only  two  or  three),  and 
to  let  contracts  for  only  one  or  possibly  two  years  at  a  time,  thus  making  it 
impracticable  for  any  bidder  to  offer  reasonable  terms  except  those  who  were 
already  doing  the  work  and  accordingly  had  the  necessary  equipment,  or  else 
those  who  felt  satisfied  that  their  pull  with  the  powers  in  control  would  be 
sufficient  in  the  future  to  guarantee  their  obtaining  the  contract  for  several 
years  to  come.  No  contractor  could  safely  make  a  contract  for  one  year,  with 
no  guarantee  that  he  would  be  able  to  renew  the  contract  for  the  succeeding 
year  or  years,  without  including  in  his  price  a  sufficient  amount  to  entirely 
reimburse  himself  for  the  cost  of  the  equipment.  This  was  one  of  the  most 
outstanding  features  which  condemned  the  Philadelphia  system  of  awarding 
these  contracts,  but  the  poUticians  in  control  had  numerous  other  methods  of 
rewarding  favorites,  punishing  those  who  rebelled  against  their  control  and 
entirely  eliminating  from  the  competition  those  whom  they  did  not  favor. 

It  is  true  that,  with  the  work  done  by  city  forces,  opportunities  for  graft 
are  by  no  means  eliminated;  but  at  least  the  contemptible  politicians  who  have 
acquired  millions  through  their  control  of  these  public  services,  although  them- 
selves holding  no  position  in  the  government,  will  be  required  to  reveal  them- 
selves, or  the  grafting  methods  can  be  traced  more  directly  to  the  officials 
personally  responsible  for  them,  who  can  be  gotten  at  directly  by  the  votes  of 
the  public  if  not  by  the  law. 

An  effective  way  of  getting  rid  of  the  contractors  therefore  was 
for  the  city  to  do  its  own  work.  Philadelphia  of  all  the  large 
cities  of  the  country  has  been  allowing  contractors  to  clean  its 
streets  and  remove  its  waste  of  various  kinds.  Hereafter  the 
city  shall  do  these  things  except  in  special  cases  when  a  majority 
of  all  the  members  elected  to  the  council,  with  the  approval  of  the 
mayor,  may  authorize  and  direct  otherwise.  This  great  change 
in  public  policy  is  to  be  borne  in  mind  when  reading  the  praises 
of  the  spokesmen  of  the  Vares  (the  contractor  bosses)  when  they 
realized  that  they  could  not  defeat  the  charter.  These  statements 
represent  study  in  political  opportunism.  State  Senator  Vare 
resorted  to  every  known  political  expedient  to  defeat  the  measure : 
delay,  objurgation,  chicanery,  wire-pulling,  and  so  on  through  the 
whole  long  list  of  twisting  and  turning  to  which  designing  politicians 
resort  were  brought  into  play  for  weeks  and  months.  All  to  no 
avail,  however.  Then  volte  face — their  floor  leader — one  John  R.  K. 
Scott,  known  as  a  "tenderloin  lawyer,"  praised  the  bill  and  Gover- 
nor Sproul,  who  had  steadfastly  stood  by  the  charter  from  the 
beginning. 


324  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OP  SOCIOLOGY 

Here  is  one  interview  with  Senator  Vare  which  is  illuminating 
in  more  ways  than  one,  and  interesting,  although  lacking  the 
pungency  that  seasoned  the  utterances  of  George  Washington 
Plunkett  and  Richard  Croker.  After  declaring  the  measure  ridicu- 
lous he  said : 

If  the  new  council  wanted  the  city  to  do  its  own  work  how  could  it  get 
ready  in  the  middle  of  the  summer  ?  It  will  take  at  least  a  year  to  raise  the 
necessary  funds  to  finance  such  a  big  enterprise.  Plants  and  equipment  will 
cost  the  city  between  $5,000,000  and  $10,000,000.  If  the  charter  revisionists 
had  their  way,  the  city  would  face  a  situation  whereby  the  job  of  doing  its  own 
street  cleaning  would  be  forced  upon  it  with  no  funds  available  to  carry  it  out. 

The  proposal  to  deprive  men  of  their  constitutional  rights  by  prohibiting 
them  from  taking  any  interest  in  party  affairs  simply  because  they  hold  office 
under  the  city  is  asinine.  Their  rights  should  be  guarded  and  protected 
under  the  constitution  the  same  as  those  of  any  other  citizen  who  has  interest 
enough  in  the  affairs  of  his  own  city  to  want  to  have  some  say  in  its  government. 

I  want  to  take  this  opportunity  to  warn  the  taxpayers  that  the  taxes  will 
go  sky-high,  under  this  bill  prepared  by  impractical  people  if  it  should  happen 
to  become  a  law.  Every  person  who  has  had  anything  to  do  with  the  bill 
will  be  ashamed  of  it  and  trying  to  run  away  from  it  within  six  months  after 
it  is  in  operation. 

The  contractors  presented  the  interesting  feature  of  having 
certain  of  their  adherents  praise  the  measure  (and  all  of  them,  with 
two  exceptions,  voting  for  it  on  final  passage)  and  having  certain 
others  find  mare's-nests  in  the  bill.  "When  the  devil  was  sick," 
and  all  the  rest  of  the  doggerel,  was  aptly  illustrated. 

At  the  present  moment  the  chief  of  the  bureau  of  street  cleaning 
(a  former  army  officer  who  was  selected  from  an  eligible  list  resulting 
from  a  civil  service  test)  is  conducting  the  necessary  preliminary 
study  into  the  advisibility  of  having  the  streets  cleaned  and  garbage, 
ashes,  and  refuse  collected  by  city  force.  In  the  words  of  the 
editor  of  Public  Works: 

Without  being  over-sanguine,  we  hope  that  this  may  be  the  beginning  of  a 
movement  for  the  improvement  of  public  service  conditions  in  Philadelphia 
which  will  end  in  the  pubhc's  finally  casting  off  the  strangling  embrace  of  the 
two  or  three  "old  men  of  the  sea"  whom  they  have  for  years  been  carrying  as 
unofficial  recipients  of  a  large  share  of  their  taxes. 

Article  8  of  the  new  charter  act  creates  in  Philadelphia's  government  a  new 
department,  the  Department  of  Public  Welfare.  This  article  outlines  the 
powers  of  the  department  but  leaves  the  details  of  organization  and  administra- 


PROGRESS  IN  PHILADELPHIA  325 

tion  to  the  council  and  the  department  head.    Briefly  stated  the  main  functions 
of  the  department  are: 

1.  To  "have  the  care,  management,  administration,  and  supervision  of 
all  charitable,  correctional,  and  reformatory  institutions,  and  agencies  (includ- 
ing any  house  of  correction,  but  not  including  hospitals),  the  control  or  govern- 
ment of  which  is  entrusted  to"  the  city; 

2.  "To  create,  organize,  manage,  and  supervise  the  various  playgrounds, 
recreation  centers,  municipal  floating-baths,  bathing-grounds,  and  recrea- 
rion  piers,  ....  and  to  plan  and  recommend  ....  and,  after  appropriate 
action  by  ordinance,  to  create  and  develop,  an  adequate  and  complete  system  of 
playgroimds  and  recreation  centers  and  related  activities";  and 

3.  To  "have  jurisdiction  over  such  other  matters  affecting  the  pubHc 
welfare  as  may  be  provided  for  by  ordinance. " 

Under  the  old  law  the  more  distinctly  social-welfare  activities 
of  the  city  were  scattered  among  various  departments  and  boards. 
The  bureau  of  correction  in  the  department  of  public  safety  had 
control  of  the  house  of  correction  at  Holmesburg;  the  bureau  of 
charities  of  the  department  of  public  health  and  charities,  managed 
the  general  hospital  and  almshouse;  the  board  of  recreation  had 
charge  of  playgrounds  and  other  recreational  activities.  Under 
the  new  charter  all  these  activities  were  placed  under  a  department 
of  public  welfare.  This  department  may  be  authorized  by  the 
council  to  take  over  other  welfare  activities  also.  The  creation 
of  this  department  is  in  line  with  modern  practice  in  many  cities, 
notably  Kansas  City  and  Dayton.  In  all  of  these  cities  highly 
beneficial  results  have  followed  the  establishment  of  welfare  depart- 
ments. The  creation  of  the  department  of  public  welfare  left  the 
bureau  of  health  as  the  only  bureau  in  the  present  department  of 
public  health  and  charities.  That  bureau  is  a  very  large  one, 
containing  several  divisions — medical  inspection,  housing  and  sani- 
tation, dispensaries,  vital  statistics,  child  hygiene,  food-inspection 
laboratories,  and  contagious-disease  hospitals — and  is  of  sufficient 
importance  to  be  a  separate  department.  The  charter  accom- 
pUshed  this,  at  the  same  time  abolishing  the  double-barreled 
department  of  public  health  and  charities. 

It  remained,  however,  for  Senator  Vare  to  point  out  the  iniquity 
of  such  a  management.  In  an  interview  he  said  "the  charter 
bin  notwithstanding  some  corrections  made  by  Governor  Sproul 
is  still  ridiculous.     Picture  the  paupers  in  the  county  almshouses 


326  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

and  the  children  in  our  public  playgrounds  associated  under  one 
department." 

Some  other  features  included  the  shortening  of  the  ballot  by 
making  the  city's  law  officer  (the  city  solicitor)  an  appointive 
rather  than  an  elective  one;  the  creation  of  a  purchasing  agent  in 
place  of  a  department  of  supplies,  and  provision  for  a  city  architect 
to  take  over  all  the  routine  architectural  work  of  the  city.  The 
more  important  architectural  work  however  may  be  handled  by 
outside  architects  specially  chosen  by  the  city  architect  with  the 
approval  of  the  mayor.  Besides  co-ordinating  a  highly  specialized 
part  of  the  city's  work  now  widely  scattered  among  the  depart- 
ments, this  arrangement  will  undoubtedly  effect  a  considerable 
saving  in  money. 

This  new  instrument  of  municipal  government  has  great 
possibilities,  which  the  first  administration  chosen  to  carry  into 
effect,  is  proceeding  to  use  for  the  advancement  of  the  true  interests 
of  the  city.  Fortunately  the  people  were  sufficiently  aroused  to 
the  situation  and  sufficiently  well  organized  to  secure  the  election 
of  a  capable  man  to  the  mayoralty  in  the  person  of  J.  Hampton 
Moore.  He  beat  the  so-called  "unbeatable  Vare  machine"  in 
the  Republican  primaries  but  only  by  the  narrow  majority  of  1,313. 
His  election  in  November  was  by  an  ovenvhelming  majority. 
Mayor  Moore  had  made  for  himself  a  place  high  in  the  federal 
Congress  by  reason  of  his  intelligence,  industry,  and  persistence. 
Moreover,  he  is  not  afraid  to  be  known  as  a  politician  and  his  foes 
know  him  as  a  valiant  fighter.  All  of  these  qualifications  he  is 
manifesting  in  his  assumption  of  the  great  powers  as  mayor  of 
Philadelphia. 

How  came  he  to  be  nomiaated  over  the  popular  candidate  of  so 

powerful  an  organization?    To  his  own  personality  and  ability 

as  a  campaigner  there  were  added  the  backing  of  the  independent 

forces   of   the   city   and   the   Penrose   Republican  Alliance.     All 

worked  together  with  the  result  that  there  was  elected  a  man  to 

carry  into  effect  the  highly  prized  charter  of  whom  the  North 

American  could  say: 

The  citizens  of  this  city  pay  a  line  tribute  to  Mayor  Moore  in  accepting 
at  face  value  his  assurances  that  he  intends  to  make  the  welfare  of  the  city 
paramount  to  all  other  interests.     Philadelphians  have  heard  former  mayors 


PROGRESS  IN  PHILADELPHIA  327 

make  solemn  pledges  and  virtuous  protestations,  only  to  be  cast  aside  for 
political  and  personal  advantage.  But  Mayor  Moore  has  already  given 
satisfying  proof  that  his  chief  aim  is  to  serve  the  city  honestly.  This  proof 
lies  in  his  wise  and  courageous  course  in  meeting  every  important  test  which 
thus  far  has  confronted  him  as  mayor-elect  and  mayor. 

He  has  shown  that  he  is  not  only  unalterably  opposed  to  the  sinister 
contracting  interests  which  he  was  pledged  and  elected  to  combat,  but  he  has 
proved  that  in  his  official  acts  as  mayor  he  has  been  absolutely  independent 
of  all  other  political  and  special  interests. 

The  most  impressive  illustration  of  how  his  administration  is  regarded 
by  those  who  have  most  at  stake  is  the  bitter  antagonistic  attitude  of  the 
Vare  pohtical  machine.  Senator  Vare,  as  dictator  of  the  city  RepubUcan 
organization,  defined  his  attitude  toward  the  new  mayor  some  weeks  ago 
in  language  intended  to  intimidate  Mr.  Moore.  This  was  before  the  cabinet 
appointments  had  been  made,  and  the  purpose  of  the  Vare  outbreak  was 
obvious. 

After  the  names  of  the  new  directors  had  been  announced,  disclosing 
to  Senator  Vare  the  disconcerting  fact  that  the  mayor  had  not  been  moved 
by  the  contractors'  threats,  open  war  was  declared  on  the  new  administration. 
Every  effort  was  made  to  hamper  and  even  to  prevent  the  orderly  reorgani- 
zation of  the  city  government  under  the  new  charter. 

The  character  of  a  mayor's  cabinet  appointments  may  be  accepted  as  an 
almost  infaUible  index  of  his  aims  and  purposes,  as  well  as  an  earnest  of  the 
character  of  the  administration. 

Whence  this  admirable  charter,  about  90  per  cent  of  which 
became  a  law  in  the  shape  in  which  it  was  originally  drafted? 

Four  years  ago  a  charter  committee  prepared  a  series  of  bills  to 
accomplish  the  reforms  embodied  ui  the  law  of  191 9.  There  were 
nearly  a  score  of  them,  which  represented  close  study,  hard  work, 
and  a  very  long  step  forward— but  they  fell  by  the  wayside.  In 
fact  they  did  not  even  get  out  of  the  committees.  Senator  Vare 
was  "very  much  on  the  job"  and  had  a  friendly,  not  to  say  a 
docile,  governor  in  the  executive  mansion  in  the  person  of  Governor 
Brumbaugh.  Senator  Penrose  who  favored  them  was  kept  in 
Washington  because  of  the  war  situation  and  so  Senator  Vare  took 
the  first  set  6-0.  The  latter  does  not  understand  the  progressive 
and  never  will.  He  is  as  defective  in  his  psychology  as  the  Prussian 
whom  he  undoubtedly  follows  in  his  methods.  The  charter 
revisionists  were  merely  delayed,  however,  in  their  efiforts — not 
defeated.  They  renewed  their  work  in  the  autumn  of  191 8,  got 
the  new  governor,  William  C.  Sproul,  interested,  and  kept  him 


328  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

interested  to  the  end.  The  new  movement  was  inaugurated  at  a 
great  charter  dinner  in  December,  1918,  nine  hundred  men  and 
women  being  present — among  them  Governor-elect  Sproul  and 
his  attorney-general,  William  I.  Shaffer.  From  that  dinner  until 
the  signing  of  the  bill  he  took  a  leading  part,  and  it  was  due  to  his 
interest,  activity,  and  forcefulness  that  Philadelphia  has  a  charter 
that  may  properly  and  conservatively  be  regarded  as  a  most 
substantial  contribution  to  the  better  government  of  America's 
third  city. 

A  single  measure  was  agreed  upon,  a  codification  of  the  Bullitt 
Bill  and  its  amendments  with  such  changes  as  have  been  noted 
and  many  others  of  a  less  conspicuous  character  necessary  for  the 
easy  running  of  the  city's  machinery.  The  committee  not  only 
drafted  the  measure,  but  actively  advanced  it  throughout  the  city 
and  state,  on  the  stump,  in  the  press,  by  pamphlet,  in  the  legis- 
lative halls,  everywhere  that  an  audience  could  be  gathered,  and, 
although  the  charter  revisionists  only  had  ten  votes  out  of  forty-one 
in  the  Philadelphia  delegation  to  the  House  of  Representatives 
and  two  out  of  the  eight  senators  from  the  city,  they  broke  legis- 
lative precedent  and  secured  the  passage  of  the  bill  by  an  over- 
whelming vote  and  finally  by  a  practically  unanimous  vote.  When 
the  Vares  saw  the  handwriting  on  the  wall,  during  a  series  of  test 
votes,  they  made  virtue  of  a  necessity  and  "  turned  in. " 

How  was  such  a  result  achieved?  There  is  no  doubt  among 
those  most  closely  in  touch  with  the  situation  that  United  States 
Senator  Boies  Penrose  was  the  greatest  single  factor  in  securing 
the  passage  of  the  bill.  He  brought  the  weight  of  his  personal 
influence  and  of  the  state  organization  to  bear  at  critical  times. 
It  is  only  fair  to  say  that  without  his  personal  help  the  measure 
would  have  foundered  on  the  rocks.  There  are  those  who  feel 
that  his  interest  was  primarily  a  political  one— but  as  I  have  said 
on  another  occasion  such  overlook  the  fact  that  he  is  a  long-time 
student  of  city  government  and  that  he  has  long  cherished  a  desire 
to  give  to  his  native  city  a  charter  worthy  of  the  city's  need  and 
opportunities.  So  active  has  he  been  in  recent  years  in  federal 
affairs  and  state  politics  that  his  fellow-townsmen  forget  that  his 
first  contribution  as  a  publicist  was  an  account  of  the  government 
of  the  city  of  Philadelphia,  which  he  prepared  in  conjunction  with 


PROGRESS  IN  PHILADELPHIA  329 

his  then  partner  (the  late  Edward  P.  Allinson)  for  the  Johns  Hopkins 
University  series.  This  book,  a  model  of  concise  and  accurate 
statement,  remains  to  this  day  as  the  most  satisfactory  statement 
of  Philadelphia's  government  from  the  early  days  of  the  enactment 
of  the  Bullitt  Bill.  It  is  to  be  hoped  that  this  interesting  and 
important  publication  will  be  brought  up  to  date  so  as  to  include 
this  new  charter,  which  bears  the  name  of  Senator  Woodward, 
who  introduced  it  into  the  Senate  and  was  its  sponsor  through  the 
legislature. 

Those  in  the  confidence  of  Senator  Penrose  feel,  I  am  told,  that 
he  is  not  through  with  his  efforts  to  improve  Philadelphia's  govern- 
mental machinery  and  that  he  is  studying  other  ways  and  means  of 
giving  Philadelphia  the  most  modern  and  up-to-date  form  of 
government  which  can  be  devised.  He  feels,  I  believe,  like  many 
others  who  have  given  the  situation  their  serious  consideration, 
that  the  present  charter,  while  it  represents  a  long  step  forward, 
is  only  a  step,  and  by  no  means  the  last  word.  The  mayor  is  still 
too  powerful  as  an  appointing  officer  and  it  is  out  of  keeping  with 
modern  efficiency  methods  to  make  the  chief  executive  of  a  great 
corporation  subject  to  the  winds  and  whimsies  of  politics.  When 
pubKc  sentiment  is  ready  for  the  next  step  (and  we  must  not 
overlook  the  fact  that  sound  public  sentiment  is  leisurely  in  its 
development),  it  will  be  in  the  direction  of  a  chief  administrator 
chosen  by  the  council.  On  several  occasions  the  senior  senator 
has  spoken  along  these  lines  and  it  is  to  be  hoped  that  he  will  be 
sufficiently  free  of  other  obligations  in  the  near  future  to  give  the 
weight  of  his  personal  influence  to  the  active  advocacy  of  these 
views. 

Accompanying  the  charter  bills  and  enacted  through  the  same 
influences  were  a  series  of  electoral  reform  measures  designed  to 
curtail  the  power  of  organization  control  in  Philadelphia.  Among 
them  was  one  gi\Tng  effect  to  the  marking  of  the  ballot  so  that  the 
voter  who  marked  a  straight  ticket  and  a  candidate  in  some  other 
column  will  have  his  vote  for  that  candidate  counted.  Certainly 
a  fair  and  proper  thing  to  do.  Another  revised  the  registration 
law  and  opened  the  door  to  the  reorganization  of  the  Philadelphia 
board  which  had  become  a  mere  appendix  of  the  Vare  organization 
and  revised  certain  of  the  onerous  provisions  that  had  been  inserted 


330  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

in  the  original  bill  (see  American  Journal  of  Sociology,  XIII  [1907], 
p.  252). 

Another  act  for  the  preservation  and  return  of  all  ballots 
which  may  have  been  soiled,  spoiled,  mismarked,  mutilated,  or 
rejected  for  any  cause  is  regarded  as  an  important  check  on 
election  oflScers  and  a  preventive  of  fraud  and  ballot-box  stuffing. 
The  practice  of  changing  polling  places  arbitrarily  for  factional 
political  reasons,  which  has  obtained  in  the  past,  is  ended  by  the 
third  measure,  which  requires  a  petition  signed  by  a  majority  of 
the  electors  in  a  division  before  a  polling  place  can  be  changed. 

In  reporting  on  progress  in  Philadelphia  mention  must  be 
made  of  certain  of  its  organizations  which  have  been  devoting 
themselves  with  ability  and  public  spirit  to  the  city's  problems. 
Easily  chief  among  these  is  the  Bureau  of  Municipal  Research,  to 
which  reference  has  already  been  made.  It  concerns  itself  pri- 
marily with  problems  of  administration  and  in  the  technique  or 
mechanics  of  government  rather  than  in  ''reform"  or  political 
activities  to  secure  good  men  in  office  and  to  expose  and  punish 
corruption.  Bureaus  of  municipal  research  are  dedicated  to  the 
idea  that  citizens  are  ultimately  responsible  for  their  governments 
regardless  of  who  is  in  office,  and  they  therefore  seek  solutions  for 
problems  with  as  little  emphasis  as  possible  on  personal  or  partisan 
considerations.  The  Philadelphia  bureau  has  had  a  long  record  of 
accomplishment,  and  is  regarded  as  having  met  with  commendable 
success  in  spite  of  peculiarly  difficult  traditions.  Like  most  of 
the  other  bureaus  it  started  out  with  specific  studies  of  govern- 
mental departments,  with  constructive  recommendations  as  to 
their  improvements.  In  the  beginning  it  met  with  hostile  suspicion 
on  the  part  of  most  of  the  officials,  but  it  gradually  established 
working  relations  with  a  great  many  of  the  more  important  officers, 
and  for  the  first  six  or  seven  years  it  submitted  a  number  of  care- 
fully prepared  reports  which  have  led  to  concrete  improvements  in 
Philadelphia's  local  government.  Among  the  permanent  results 
that  stand  out  prominently  in  this  earlier  work  of  the  bureau  are 
the  following: 

The  Board  of  Education  reorganized  its  bureau  of  compulsory 
education  and  made  it  an  effective  and  serviceable  part  of  the 
educational  system  instead  of  a  haven  for  broken-down  henchmen. 


PROGRESS  IN  PHILADELPHIA  331 

The  greater  part  of  the  early  activities  of  the  bureau  were  in 
the  field  of  accounting  and  finance.  Prior  to  1909  the  accounts 
of  all  city  departments  (including  1:he  controller's  ofiice)  were  in 
effect  merely  memoranda  of  cash  transactions.  The  bureau 
co-operated  with  the  controller  for  several  years  in  installing 
modern  fund  and  expense  accounts  in  his  ofl&ce  and  the  work  was 
extended  to  a  number  of  other  bureaus  and  departments.  This 
was  accomplished  through  the  assistance  of  Will  B.  Hadley,  then 
in  the  bureau,  but  subsequently  made  deputy  controller  and 
finally  controller.  The  bureau  also  co-operated  in  the  preparation 
of  the  controller's  manual  of  accounting,  which  was  hailed  the 
country  over  as  a  great  step  forward  in  municipal  accounting. 

Budget  work  has  occupied  its  attention  for  nearly  every  year 
since  its  organization,  and  it  is  interesting  to  note  that  the  very 
word  "budget"  was  not  even  used  in  connection  with  municipal 
finances  prior  to  the  bureau's  appearance  on  the  scene.  Great 
advance  has  been  made  in  budget  procedure,  although  the  progress 
seems  imperceptibly  slow  at  times,  the  last  signal  advance  having 
been  made  in  connection  with  the  financial  provisions  of  the  new 
city  charter. 

A  piece  of  work  done  in  the  Bureau  of  Health  resulted  in  great 
benefit.  It  was  the  compilation  of  a  digest  of  all  the  laws  and 
ordinances  pertaining  to  the  public  health.  These  were  formerly 
scattered  through  numerous  volumes  and  the  health  authorities 
and  their  employees  were  in  frequent  difficulty  for  the  lack  of  a 
comprehensive  guide.  Because  of  the  fact  that  the  health  officials' 
time  was  already  fully  taken  up  with  their  usual  duties,  they 
found  it  impossible  to  give  the  amoimt  of  time,  as  well  as  energy, 
needed  for  such  a  job  as  making  a  digest,  and  the  proffer  of  help 
from  the  bureau  was  heartily  welcomed.  The  work  proved  so 
satisfactory  that  the  department  printed  the  digest— a  250-page 
octavo  volume. 

For  seventeen  years  there  had  been  no  revision  of  the  manual 
carried  by  each  patrolman  for  his  guidance.  A  new  manual, 
up  to  date  in  every  respect,  and  containing  in  compact  form  the 
vast  amount  of  information  needed  by  every  policeman,  was 
drawn  up  and  a  copy  given  to  every  member  of  the  force.  Some 
of  the  work  on  this  manual,  as  well  as  most  of  the  installation  of 


332  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

the  other  plans  for  improving  methods  in  the  department  of 
public  safety,  was  done  by  Captain  Martin  H.  Ray  (formerly  in 
the  United  States  Army),  who  was  detailed  to  serve  as  special  aide 
to  Director  George  D,  Porter,  but  who  remained  on  the  bureau 
staff  and  pay-roll. 

The  bureau  had  an  opportvmity  for  rendering  service  in  a  type 
of  governmental  unit  in  which  few  bureaus  of  municipal  research 
and  civic  bodies  have  as  a  rule  done  little.  In  February,  191 5, 
the  municipal  court,  which  had  begun  operations  only  about  a 
year  previously,  found  that  its  domestic-relations  division  was 
having  difficulty  in  taking  care  of  its  records  and  social  statistics. 
President  Judge  Charles  L.  Brown  realized  the  difficulty,  and  invited 
the  bureau  to  survey  the  division  with  a  view  to  introducing  the 
Hollerith  system  of  compiling  information.  The  invitation  was 
accepted  with  the  proviso  that  it  need  not  confine  itself  merely  to 
the  problem  of  tabulation,  and  it  proceeded  to  make  a  report  on 
the  organization,  methods  and  procedure  of  the  division.  It 
devised  a  new  system  for  keeping  case  records  and  installed  a 
complete  system  of  mechanical  tabulation  of  the  social  and  pro- 
cedural data  of  the  domestic-relations  cases. 

These  are  illustrations  of  the  bureau's  activities  and  are  selected, 
primarily,  for  their  diversity,  but  also  to  show  the  permanent 
and  cumulative  value  of  this  kind  of  work.  Some  of  the  later 
activities  were  made  possible  when  the  agency  had  won  a  place  of 
greater  service  in  the  community,  and  had  established  itself  as  a 
definite  civic  force  through  the  patient  and  persistent  efforts  of  its 
first  years. 

Reference  has  already  been  made  to  the  bureau's  interest  in 
civil  service  matters  to  which  it  has  made  and  is  making  substantial 
contributions.  The  Civil  Service  Reform  Association  is  another 
organization  which  has  been  actively  at  work  along  constructive 
lines  co-operating  with  the  various  officials  and  especially  with 
the  Civil  Service  Commission.  It  and  the  bureau  co-operated 
in  the  drafting  of  the  new  charter  and  are  now  helping  Mayor 
Moore  and  his  colleagues  to  give  it  real  force  and  effect. 

By  and  large  Philadelphia  is  making  progress,  the  rapidity 
and  extent  depending  as  always  on  the  activity  and  co-operation 
of  the  citizen. 


A  PSYCHOANALYTIC  INTERPRETATION  OF  GROUP 
FORMATION  AND  BEHAVIOR 


THOMAS  D.  ELIOT 
Northwestern  University 


I 

In  1918,  Dr.  W.  F.  Ogbum  presented  to  the  American  Eco- 
nomic Association  at  Richmond  an  analysis  of  the  psychological 
background  of  the  economic  interpretation  of  history/  His 
paper  furnishes  a  starting-point  for  the  statement  of  some 
further  social  implications  of  the  biogenetic  psychology  which 
may  prove  new  and  useful  in  the  interpretation  of  events  and  in 
the  synthesis  of  political,   economic,   and  psychological  theory. 

As  with  Dr.  Ogburn's  paper,  no  attempt  is  made  to  prove 
the  points  herein  made.  For  the  most  part,  in  fact,  they  are 
simply  applications  of  some  of  the  new  concepts  in  psychology 
to  perfectly  familiar  events,  in  a  way  which  links  two  or  three 
fields  of  learning  and  makes  psychology  a  helpmeet  and  illuminator 
of  social  science. 

Briefly,  Dr.  Ogburn's  thesis  was  that  the  frequent  apparent 
obscurity  of  economic  causes  in  history  is  due  to  the  stigma  which 
civilization,  especially  Christian  civilization,  has  usually  attached 
to  selfishness  in  politics,  and,  one  might  add,  the  more  immediate 
pressure  which  politicians  are  always  under  of  winning  support 
by  assurances  of  common  interest  in  the  good  of  the  whole  group. 
The  social  disapproval  and  disadvantage  imposed  upon  the  free 
expression  of  greed  or  self-interest  have  led  to  the  camouflage  of 
motives  which  are  basically  economic' 

Dr.  Ogburn  recognizes  in  these  political  processes  certain 
common  mental   tricks   or   mechanisms   which   have   long   been 

'  American  Economic  Review,  Supplement,  March,  1919. 

'  Interesting  parallels  of  this  thesis  were  ingeniously  illustrated  by  Dr.  Patten, 
in  his  Development  of  English  Thought;  cf.  pp.  15  ff.,  108-9,  112  ff.,  131-32,  145  ff., 
205-6,  257,  277 ff. 

333 


334  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

classified  by  the  psychoanalysts  in  work  with  individuals.  By 
followers  of  Machiavelli  and  Treitschke,  perhaps,  the  tricks  are 
consciously  employed.  Many  politicians,  however,  find  it  neces- 
sary to  deceive  themselves  before  they  can  deceive  their  public. 
The  subconscious  holds  in  leash  the  real  wish  which  gets  its  ful- 
filment or  compensation  by  justifying  itself  in  the  name  of  social 
welfare,  patriotism,  revenge,  culture,  religion,  rescue,  necessity, 
or  self-defense. 

According  to  Dr.  Ogburn,  however,  all  these  motives  are  fun- 
damentally economic  in  origin  or  necessarily  become  economic 
before  they  are  transmuted,  rationalized,  or  re-evaluated  by  poli- 
ticians and  historians. 

It  is  at  this  point  that  further  inquiry  is  suggested;  viz.,  in 
the  psychoanalysis  of  the  economic  motive  itself.  It  is  complex, 
built  up  of  various  simplex  motives  rooting  in  instinctive  needs  or 
mechanisms  of  behavior  for  which  there  is  no  apparent  expression 
or  release  at  present  except  through  economic  channels.  Carleton 
Parker's  paper  of  the  year  previous  partially  covered  this  ground. 
He  stated  the  well-known  economic  and  psychological  causes  of 
industrial  unrest  and  analyzed  the  process  from  cause  to  effect 
in  terms  of  modern  psychiatry — impulse,  suppression,  psychosis. 
But  he  confined  his  analysis  to  anti-social  groups,  especially  the 
I.W.W.  of  the  Northwest.  Similar  analysis  can,  it  seems  to  the 
writer,  be  applied  profitably  to  group  motivation  in  general. 
An  attempt  at  such  analysis  will  here  be  approached  through  a 
brief  preliminary  description  of  personality  in  terms  of  the  "new"' 
psychology. 

II 

The  individual  may  be  roughly  symbolized  for  our  purposes 
(Fig.  i)  by  a  circle  inclosing  arrows  representing  impulses,  wishes, 
strivings,  "motor  sets,"  as  Holt  phrases  it.  At  birth  we  may 
assume  that  these  impulses  are  largely  inchoate,  being  temporary 
''amoebic"  expressions  of  the  total  prenatal  biochemical  energy 
of  the  individual  pushing  out  to  the  environment  in  various  instinc- 
tive responses,  the  chief  of  which  are  nutritive  and  "auto-erotic." 

These  impulses  do  not  tend  at  first  to  be  introspective.  Many 
of  them  are  at  mutual  odds,   but  they  are  not  even  organized 


GROUP  FORMATION  AND  BEHAVIOR 


335 


enough  to  realize  much  mutual  conflict.  What  conflict  there  is, 
is  normally  not  deep  seated ;  it  is  easily  forgot.  The  child  soon  gets 
over  a  cry.  But,  because  the  directions  of  these  impulses  are  widely 
distributed,  there  is  an  approximate  equilibrium,  an  unstable 
equilibrium,  such  that  a  stimulus  from  nearly  any  quarter  will 
bring  a  quick  response  in  that  direction,  yet  diverted  with  com- 
parative ease  in  another  direction  by  a  different  stimulus.  The 
undeveloped  personality  is  suggestible,  whether  child  or  savage. 

Yet  even  in  undeveloped  personalities  there  is  often  a  "trend" 
or  "bent" — a  predominance  of  certain  strong  instincts,  or  groups 
of  impulses  which,  by  composition  of  forces,  give  the  individuality 


») ^  lewvpevatQ/dixlf 


Fig.  I. — Symbol  of  an  undeveloped  personality.  A  general  trend  to  the  right 
is  indicated,  but  the  wishes  are  unorganized,  at  cross-purposes.  The  dark  center 
represents  the  original  font  from  which  life-energy  (soul,  libido,  elan)  wells  up  and  out 
at  various  levels.     (Cf .  Jelliffe,  The  Technique  of  Psychoanalysis,  diagrams.) 

a  certain  initial  direction.  In  any  case,  the  equilibrium  is  soon 
broken,  whether  from  within  or  from  without;  and  certain  desires 
are  subordinated  more  or  less  permanently,  more  or  less  success- 
fully, to  others.  Crude  organic  impulses  are  refined,  combined, 
recombined  into  the  more  complex  interests,  specific  desires  and 
wishes.  The  real  dynamics  of  these  interests  still,  however,  root 
back  into  primitive,  often  unconscious,  sources. 

It  used  to  be  the  fashion  to  conceive  society  as  created  in  the 
image  of  an  organism.  It  may  be  useful,  at  least,  to  reverse  the 
analogy  and  to  conceive  the  impulses  in  the  individual  as  in  some 
sort  a  society,  proliferating,  gradually  differentiating  into  groups, 


3S^ 


THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 


"high-brow"  and  "low-brow,"  with  its  subconscious  roughly 
corresponding  to  the  inarticulate  public,  its  suppressed  complexes 
to  the  "submerged  tenth"  or  "rebel  reds,"  and  its  focus  of  con- 
sciousness and  behavior  to  society's  dominant  class  activities. 
Sanity  (a  state  approximated  but  never  absolute)  in  the  indi- 
vidual is  comparable  to  social  justice.^  Some  individualities 
(the  idiotic)  fail  ever  to  organize.  Still  others  (the  neurotic) 
organize  unsuccessfully  or  disastrously  their  warring  impulses. 
The  foregoing  analogy  will  not  hold  good  throughout,  but 
will  make  clearer  the  concept  which  follows.     For  the  formation 


\&6  W\.sY\.es 

^  y^ ^Effeclwe 

L\fe-Pv;x^pose. 

vfe-TxjxjPose 

CoTcv  pexvsa.X\,oxv,6XO) 

Fig.  2 — Symbol  of  a  developed  personality.  Strong  polarization  of  impulses 
into  a  life-purpose;  other  impulses  (a)  expressed  as  hobbies,  (b)  modified  to  serve 
main  purpose,  (c)  suppressed,  and  (d)  dodging  or  delinquent. 

of  personality  may  be  stated  in  terms  of  the  organization  of  its 
impulses  into  a  working  whole,  just  as  the  formation  of  a  state 
may  be  stated  in  terms  of  the  harmonization  of  conflicting  interests. 
(See  Fig.  2.)  Some  impulses  are  suppressed,  some  are  diverted, 
some  are  sublimated,  some  are  encouraged  and  draw  others  to 
them.  Some  outlaw  impulses  escape,  or  remain  concealed  in 
respectable  company.  The  whole  becomes  shot  through  with  a 
purpose  or  design,  like  the  lines  of  force  in  a  magnetic  field.  The 
more  highly  organized  personalities  are  recognized  by  their  drawing 
or  driving  power,  their  concentration,  equanimity,  and  singleness 
of  purpose,  and  their  elTective  relation  to  their  environments. 
'  Cf.  Giddings,  "The  Ethical  Motive,"  in  Democracy  and  Empire. 


GROUP  FORMATION  AND  BEHAVIOR  337 

They  have  acquired  "character."  In  psychological  terms,  they 
have  synthesized,  organized,  and  sublimated  their  total  energy  in 
relation  to  a  reality  principle.  Their  energy  is  economized  by 
self-knowledge  and  conscious  control  of  impulse,  and  a  surplus  is 
available  for  definitely  influencing  the  environment.  The  will 
becomes  free  in  the  degree  that  this  process  is  accomplished. 

This  pattern  of  personal  organization  is  not,  however,  deter- 
mined merely  by  competition  between  impulses  within  the  indi- 
vidual. That  competition  is  itself  largely  set  in  motion  and  the 
handicaps  set  by  the  conditions  of  the  environment. 

Relative  normaUty  of  an  individual  would  then  consist  (to 
adapt  Dr.  Patten's  definition)  in  the  harmonious  organization  of 
one's  impulses  in  relation  to  a  given  environment;  an  ideal  environ- 
ment would  make  such  normality  possible  for  everyone.  Under 
present  conditions  such  normality  is  possible  for  very,  very  few, 
though  many  can  attain  it  in  such  measure  as  to  be  indifferent  or 
hostile  to  social  change.  Such  are  our  conservative  classes.  Stand- 
patters are  not  necessarily  happy  or  content,  but  their  problems  of 
personal  adjustment  do  not  seem  to  them  possible  of  solution 
through  any  change  in  society  at  large.  They  may  of  course,  be 
quite  as  wrong  in  their  judgment  as  the  I.W.W.  are  in  theirs. 
They  may  fantasy  a  Utopia  of  the  past  instead  of  a  Utopia  of 
the  future. 

Ill 

Conscious  thought  may  be  roughly  defined  in  terms  of  mental 
behavior  at  a  point  of  relation  or  adjustment  between  an  individual 
and  his  environment.  The  personality  may  be  conceived  as  a 
bunch  of  stored  and  potential  behavior  of  this  sort,  conforming  to 
"distribution  curves,"  with  modes  and  variants.  Conscious 
thought,  however,  seems  in  general  to  follow  the  point  of  stimula- 
tion ;  though  stored  internal  stimuli  or  reinforced  (over-determined) 
impulses  and  interests  are  often  sufficiently  powerful  to  override 
immediate  sensory  stimuli.*  Thought  occurs  as  a  function  of 
adjustment,  and  is  most  conscious  in  the  actual  process  of  adjust- 
ment. Delay  often  seems  to  increase  the  keenness  of  desire  and 
of  satisfaction,  by  accumulation  of  affect. 

'  An  artist  fails  to  notice  a  mosquito  bite  when  absorbed  in  his  sketching. 


338  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

If  a  given  state  of  affairs  thwarts  or  fails  to  give  an  expression 
to  some  native  instincts  of  an  individual,  we  have  at  once  a  dam- 
ming of  flow,  a  congestion  of  wishes  (affect-laden  complexes),  and 
probably  acute  consciousness  and  thought.^  If  the  given  state  of 
affairs  causes  a  similar  conscious  want  in  many  people,  it  is  a 
social  condition  causing  a  social  problem.  Max  Eastman  once 
wrote,  in  substance,  that  in  politics  the  important  thing  is  not  what 
men  think  but  what  men  want;  the  purpose  of  thought  is  to  teU 
them  how  to  get  it.  This  fits  in  well  with  the  concepts  outlined 
above,  and  leads  to  their  application  in  the  field  of  political  and 
historical  interpretation. 

Various  processes  of  socialization  may  be  interpreted  in  terms 
of  wish-fulfilment  mechanisms,  ofttimes  unconscious.  These  will 
be  discussed  here  under  the  general  headings  of  group  formation, 
maintenance,  and  growth;  group  composition  and  solidarity;  group 
interrelation,  competition,  and  success;  group  sovereignty  and 
control;  group  conflict,  compromise,  and  amalgamation;  and 
group  secession  and  decomposition. 

GROUP   FORMATION,   MAINTENANCE,   AND   GROWTH 

Consciousness  of  resemblance,  like  consciousness  of  difference, 
develops  from  biological  sources  in  response  to  organic  (later 
economic)  needs.  It  is  a  socializing  factor  in  that  it  serves  to 
release  instincts  in  social  behavior  and  permits  their  satisfaction 
in  group  activities. 

Imitation  is  not  altogether  blindly  mechanical.  It  follows 
lines  of  least  resistance.  Or,  rather,  stimuli  are  responded  to  and 
behavior  imitated  with  relation  to  the  adjustment-needs  of  the 
organism.  Imitation  implies  original  similarity  of  behavior 
mechanisms  which  crave  exercise.  But  imitative  behavior  may 
not  occur  or  will  not  become  habitual  unless  it  prove  organically 
satisfying,  i.e.,  wish-fulfilling. 

'  Though,  occasionally,  in  the  face  of  unique  circumstances  the  individual  (or 
group),  lacking  appropriate  behavior  mechanisms,  fails  to  react  until  too  late,  or  only 
vaguely  "doesn't  know  what  ails  him."  Just  as  chemists,  lacking  radio-sensitive 
nerves,  were  burned  by  radioactivity  before  they  knew  it;  and  just  as  savages  ascribed 
bullets  or  diseases  to  devils,  or  conservatives  fail  to  adjust  to  a  new  social  order. 


GROUP  FORMATION  AND  BEHAVIOR  339 

Whenever  an  environment  is  such  as  to  stimulate  a  similar 
set  of  behavior  mechanisms  with  similar  affects  in  a  considerable 
number  of  people,  group  formation  has  its  natural  soil.  There 
seem  to  result  naturally  awareness  of  wants,  concomitant  reaction 
to  similar  stimuli,  like-mindedness,  consciousness  of  kind  and  of 
common  interest,  and  collective  behavior  or  co-operation.  There 
arises  a  true  social  group,  possibly  an  organization  or  even  an 
institution,  or  a  social  movement,  if  the  co-operation  prove  per- 
manently effective  in  satisfying  needs  and  wants.  Individuals  may 
join  already  existing  groups  for  similar  reasons.  (See  Fig.  3,  p.  340.) 
Further  aspects  of  group  growth  will  be  taken  up  under  the  heading 
of  group  competition. 

GROUP   COMPOSITION  AND   SOLIDARITY 

A  group  may  serve  interests  far  different  from  its  ostensible 
purpose.  Furthermore,  the  individuals  in  a  group  may  be  in  it 
from  fundamentally  widely  variant  motives.  One  thinks  at  once 
of  examples  such  as  the  readers  of  a  given  book  or  newspaper,  or 
the  difference  between  Senator  Lodge  and  an  Alabama  darky  as 
co-members  of  the  Republican  Party;  but  the  differences  may  be 
more  subtle.  The  real  motives  served,  or  wishes  expressed,  in 
the  choice  of  a  college  or  a  club,  for  example,  are  far  more  complex 
than  is  the  obvious  educational  or  recreational  purpose  of  the 
group,  which  is  merely  a  net  resultant  of  the  behavior  through 
which  the  various  wishes  of  individuals  find  expresson.  The 
motives  of  group-joining  may  not  even  be  conscious.  Such  is, 
perhaps,  the  condition  of  neurotics  in  social  work,  "purity"  work, 
or  suffrage  campaigns. 

It  is  in  the  motives  of  group  composition  that  we  shall  find 
the  most  important  phases  of  socio-analysis  suggested  by  Dr. 
Ogburn's  paper.  For,  while  the  ostensible  purpose  of  a  group  or 
"movement"  or  campaign  is  obvious,  its  growth  may  have  been 
fostered  by  those  who  consciously  and  deliberately,  or  subcon- 
sciously and  hypocritically,  or  unconsciously  and  naively,  are 
using  its  collective  strength  for  very  different  ends,  personal  or 
factional.  And,  inasmuch  as  economic  motives  are  admittedly 
powerful,  especially  when  backed  by  wealth,  it  is  natural  to  find 


340 


THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 


S  5     !   ! 


-^1 


Mh     (U  — 

in    V 

O     u     c/) 

9-  2 


u 


// 


^ 


i 

r 


oil*    ^  i4>f*r-^^^ 


>r- 


'5  •« 

Quo 

•35  3    g- 

acn    bC 
<u    . 
2     bO    o 

w  s  .s 


1 


(o  »*"  ,9 
H 


cS 


5  s 

U3   S   Vol 
23  O 

en  "o  -^ 

en     CO 
<n       »    •-> 

C     <n     « 

C     >     IJ 

(«  '5   B 

:h  §  g 

^  ^5 
.5  -9  .g 


GROUP  FORMATION  AND  BEHAVIOR  341 

those  so  motivated  and  backed  using,  for  example,  patriotic  "drives" 
to  serve  their  private  interests.  This  fact  does  not  preclude  the 
active  presence  of  many,  even  a  majority,  of  sincere  patriots.  In 
fact  it  is  their  presence  which  leads  both  to  the  camouflage  which 
Dr.  Ogburn  analyzes  and  to  the  usefulness  of  the  group  for  ulterior 
purposes. 

I  think  a  concrete  illustration  will  be  of  value  at  this  point. 
(See  table,  p.  343.) 

The  example  taken  is  a  selection  from  the  membership  of  an 
imaginary  church.  A  similar  analysis  could  be  worked  out  for  a 
political  party,  a  chamber  of  commerce,  or  any  other  group. 

To  represent  diagrammatically  in  two  dimensions  dynamic 
conditions  which  demand  at  least  four  dimensions  is  obviously 
impossible.  Many  complex  psycho-social  relationships  have  to 
be  omitted  entirely.  Enough  cases  are  given  to  exemplify  the 
common  psychological  mechanisms  of  combination,  compensation, 
compromise,  substitution,  rationalization,  transference,  and  sub- 
limation, conscious  or  unconscious. 

The  stages  of  recognition  of  kind,  perception  of  common 
interest,  concurrent  action,  combined  volition,  organization,  and 
co-operation  are  here  assumed  to  have  taken  place.  The  group 
is  a  going  concern  or  even  a  chartered  institution,  with  a  definite 
ostensible  purpose. 

In  each  member  certain  interests  may  be  consciously  dominant. 
These  interests  may  or  may  not  root  back  into  more  primitive  but 
less  conscious  or  repressed  material — instinctive  demands  which 
the  individual  unfamiliar  with  unconscious  mechanisms  might  not 
admit  even  to  himself.  In  each  member  there  may  also  be  sub- 
ordinate interests,  more  or  less  conscious.  The  group,  in  this 
case  the  church,  may  serve  either  the  dominant  or  the  subordinate 
needs  of  the  member.  Religion  itself  (the  ostensible  purpose  of 
the  group)  may  be  either  a  dominant  or  a  subordinate  interest 
in  the  life  of  a  member.  Religious  association  is  indulged  in  by 
many  for  whom  religion  is  not  a  dominant  wish-harmonizer  or 
integrator.  Religion,  being  itself  highly  complex,  will  serve  to 
satisfy  a  variety  of  instinctive  material,  much  of  which  is  in  an 
otherwise  unexpressed  condition.     The  appeal  of  the  church  is  to 


342  TEE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

all  the  types  just  described.  Further,  with  the  increasing  fulfil- 
ment of  people's  instinctive  desires  in  worldly  reality,  those  con- 
trolling the  church  extend  its  appeal  to  include  interests  not 
primarily  spiritual,  in  order  to  increase  or  maintain  solidarity, 
mass,  and  influence,  and  thus  serve  the  purpose  of  the  dominant 
group.  Members  joining  on  the  basis  of  these  special  appeals, 
like  those  who  join  from  shrewd  "ulterior"  motives,  merely  use 
the  church  organization  to  help  fulfil  their  special  interests,  whether 
dominant  or  subordinate.  Institutional  churches  extend  these 
appeals  indefinitely. 

Such  "use"  of  an  organization  to  fulfil  irrelevant  desires  of  its 
members  is  apt  to  be  relatively  harmless  if  it  is  not  exercised  by  a 
subgroup  powerful  enough  to  pervert  the  primary  social  purpose 
of  the  group  and  thus  betray  its  members  and  the  general  public. 
Such  factions  are  often  self-deceived.  Other  factions  if  disillusioned 
may  secede  individually  or  collectively. 

Church  members  as  typified  in  the  accompanying  table  therefore 
fall  into  three  rather  loosely  classified  groups:  (i)  those  in  whom 
reUgion  is,  at  least  ostensibly,  the  dominant  conscious  motive; 
(2)  those  in  whom  it  is  a  secondary  motive,  involved  in  church 
membership  and  activity;  and  (3)  those  in  whom  there  is  no  real 
religious  interest,  the  appeal  being  on  irrelevant  grounds.  Founders 
and  active  members  will  be  apt  to  be  found  in  the  first  and  second 
groups,  though  a  shrewd  self-seeker  from  group  three  might  also 
be  a  founder.  Ordinarily  they  are  persons  in  whose  lives  religion 
serves  as  a  harmonizing,  energizing,  assimilative  principle  which 
is  therefore  projected  as  a  dominant  interest.  Some  members, 
on  the  other  hand,  are  mere  drifters,  who  could  hardly  tell  why 
they  belong.  Many,  again,  are  thwarted  or  secretly  disappointed 
in  life;  to  them  religion  is  primarily  a  reconciler,  a  consolation, 
a  hope  of  wish-fulfilment  in  a  future  life,  or  by  proxy. 

What  interest  is  sincerely  dominant  in  a  church  member  depends 
upon  the  individual  and  the  occasion.  The  interests  indicated 
in  the  schedule  (see  table)  indicate  merely  general  trends,  or  net 
resultants  of  behavior.  The  final  column  gives  the  formula 
of  the  psychological  mechanisms  through  which  various  interests 
are  satisfied  by  membership.     In  many  cases  it  is  a  "substitute 


GROUP  FORMATION  AND  BEHAVIOR 


343 


COMPOSITION  OF  IMAGINARY  CHURCH 


Church 
Members 

Suppressed  Interests, 
If  Any,  Involved  in 
Church  Connection 

Conscious 
Dominant 
Interests 

Subordinate  Inter- 
ests, If  Consciously 
Served 

Mechanisms  of 
Wish-Fulfilment 

Clergyman 

May  be  any  of  sev- 

Religion 

Personal  ambitions; 

Personal    tastes    and 

eral     listed    for 

self-preservation; 

demands    as    well 

members  in  same 

family  affection 

as  life-purpose  ful- 

column 

filled  by  profes- 
sion 

Clergyman's 

Strong  father  image 

Religion 

Interest  in  a  young 

Waning    interest    in 

daughter 

assistant  minister 

church  may  be 
supported  by 
loyalty  and  by  a 
new    "transfer- 

ence" 

Broad-minded, 

Religion 

Other  interests  con- 
sciously correlated 

Co-ordination     of 

well-rounded 

wishes     promoting 

layman 

to  service  of  (Jod 

harmonious  satis- 
faction 

Church 

Inferiority  complex; 

Religion 

Social  service 

High    position  in 

"pillar" 

desire  for  prestige 

church  will  vindi- 
cate self-esteem 

Mystic 

Introverted    libido; 
fantasies;  mother- 
fixation 

Religion 

Aesthetic  Tastes 

Satisfaction,  in  sym- 
bolic theology,  of 
longing  for  escape 
and  security 

Bachelor 

Thwarted    in    love 

Religion 

Unconscious     substi- 

long ago 

tution 

Spinster 
(founder) 

Strong  father  image 

Religion 

Transference  to  God 

image 

Woman 

Sex  interest  in  min- 

Religion 

Unconscious  fulfilling 

(founder) 

ister 

of  suppressed  in- 
terest 

Neurotic 

A  major  suppressed 
complex 

Religion 

Resolution    of    con- 

flict by    confi- 

dence    and    conso- 

lation 

Neurotic 

A  secret  "sin"  to  be 
overcome 

Religion 

Self-esteem 

Acquisition  of  self- 
respect  through 
imitation  and  self- 
control  fostered  by 
church 

Former 

Suppressed    com- 

Reliction 

Self-esteem 

"  Emmanuel     Move- 

drunkard 

plexes     causing 
dnmkenness 

ment "  straightened 
out  suppressed  con- 
flicts; escape  from 
reality  in  religious 
symbols 

"Misfit" 

Various  internal  con- 

Religion 

Disappointed   hopes 

Compensation    in 

flicts    and    resis- 

reconciled 

belief     of     future 

tances 

rewards 

Negative 
personality 

None 

Herd  instinct 

Church  is  the  "  proper 

thing" 

Clergyman's 

Self-«ssertiveness 

Love  of  husband 

Religion 

Identification    of 

wife 

and  children 

interests  with 
husband's,  vicari- 
ous ambition, 
great  family  love, 
greatly  strengthen 
attachment  to 
church;  religion 
alone  insufficient 
thereto 

Widower 

Longing  for  wife 

Religion 

Partial    compen- 

sation by    con- 

scious   substitu- 

tion;   also  hope  of 

reunion 

Childless  parent 
(founder) 

Longing  for  chil- 
dren 

Religion 

Partial  compensation 

by   conscious  sub- 

stitution 

Mother 

Love    for    chil- 
dren 

Religion;  morality 

Sunday    school    will 

conserve  children's 

morals 

344 


THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 
COMPOSITION  OF  IMAGINARY  CHURCH 


Church 
Members 

Suppressed  Interests, 

Conscious 

Subordinate  Inter- 

Mechanisms of 
Wish-Fulfilment 

If  Any,  Involved  in 
Church  Connection 

Dominant 
Interests 

ests,  If  Consciously 
Served 

Soldier 

Mother's  code  against 

War;  success  in 

Religion 

Church    sanctions 

fighting 

army 

fighting 

Architect 

Desire  to  display  or 

Ambition    for 

Religion;  aesthetic 

Contacts   bring   con- 

project    personal- 

creative work 

tastes 

tracts;    church 

ity;     desire    for 

group    and    build- 

immortality 

ing  please  tem- 
perament 

Scholarly 

Same  as  above 

Same  as  above 

Religion;  intellectual 

Brainy   sermons   and 

teacher 

appreciation 

church  forum  are 
stimulation 

Poor  author 

Instincts  for  display 

Ambition 

Religion 

Consolation  for 
thwarted  ambition 
and  lack  of  fame; 
made  much  of  in 
the  church 

Social  worker 

Interest  in  suffering 

Service 

Religion 

Religious  chal- 
lenge to  service 
and  faith  in 
future;  victory 
through  self- 
sacrifice 

Unselfish 

Power    through 
finance 

Religion;  altruism 

Stewardship    doc- 

capitalist 

trine    reconciles 

interests 

Professor 

Inferiority  complex 

Ambition    for 
power 

Religion 

Church  of  same  de- 
nomination as  the 
college  helps  pros- 
pects 

Lonely,  enjoys  com- 

Laborer 

Complex  of  inferiority 

Self-preservation 

Religion;    social 

instincts 

pany  but  usually 
afraid  to  come,  or 
too  tired  or  poor; 
projects   a   grudge 

Poet 

Aesthetic  life 

Introvertive    imagi- 
nation 

Ritual,    symbol. 

atmosphere    are 

congenial  and  sug- 

gestive 

Selfish  manu- 

Poverty   complex; 

Money 

Love  of  wife 

Family    life    helps 

facturer 

self -centered  child- 
hood;   thwarted 
altruism 

starved  instincts; 
church  attend- 
ance keeps  wife's 
esteem 

Young    mer- 

Business profits 

Church     brings 

chant 

trade 

Lawyer 

Love  of  wife 

Ambition  to  succeed 

Church    brings    con- 

tacts   and    clients; 

wife    likes    church 

Corrupt  poli- 

Guilty  conscience 

Politics;    ambi- 

Self-esteem 

Attendance     and 

ticun 

tion 

contribution 
mask  guilt  from 
others  and  from 
self 

Society  belle 

Display 

Social  ambition 

Sex,     self-assertive- 
ness 

Fashionable  contacts 
in  church 

Young  man 

Sex  interest 

Shifting  interests 

Conformity  to  moral- 
ity of  parents 

Church  sanction  on 
dancing  permits  in- 
dulgence and  re- 
leases from  parent 
image 

Boy 

Domineering  temper 

Athletics 

Family  affection 

Desire  of  parents 
and  chance  to 
organize  church 
baseball  team 

formation"  or  "compromise"  expression  for  some  more  original 
impulse,  which  gains  a  partial  or  total  outlet  through  the  church, 
whether  or  not  there  be  in  addition  a  sincere  interest  in  religion. 


GROUP  FORMATION  AND  BEHAVIOR  345 

In  the  case  of  an  ostensibly  non-economic  group  like  the  church, 
there  is  obviously  much  complexity  of  motive  underlying  its 
membership.  Even,  however,  in  the  case  of  frankly  economic 
groups,  the  motivation  may  be  very  complex.  They  are  com- 
posed of  individuals  whose  motives  if  analyzed  would  prove  to  be 
non-economic  in  the  ordinary  material  sense.  Love  of  power, 
prestige,  or  display,  of  comfort,  leisure,  or  pleasure;  parental  and 
sexual  instincts;  the  instincts  of  workmanship  and  achievement — 
all  these  may  enter  as  dominant  or  subordinate  motives  in 
industry.' 

In  the  case  of  a  non-economic  organization  the  appeal  to 
motives  for  membership  other  than  the  ostensible  purpose  of  the 
group  seems  like  bastard  social  economy.  In  poHtical  economics 
the  appeal  for  members  on  non-economic  grounds  may  be  equally 
insincere.  It  may,  however,  have  a  legitimate  basis,  if  it  be  an 
appeal  through  the  economic  to  the  real  impulses  which  give  rise 
to  the  ''economic  motive." 

GROUP  INTERRELATION,    COMPETITION,   AND   SUCCESS 

The  same  individuals  may  be  aUgned  in  scores  of  different 
ways,  with  the  same  or  other  individuals,  for  the  fulfilment  of 
sundry  strivings.  (See  Fig.  3.)  They  form  the  interrelating  links 
between  many  groups.     Some  people  are  habitual  "joiners." 

A  group  of  any  degree  of  complexity  may  be,  like  the  organized 
personahty  of  Figure  3,  roughly  likened  for  illustrative  purposes 
to  a  magnetic  field,  polarized  around  the  major  purpose  of  the 
organization,  which  is  a  net  resultant  of  the  specific  stimuli,  the 
nature  of  the  units  affected,  and  the  general  environment;  the  envi- 
ronment would  (in  the  case  of  the  group)  include  the  wishes  of 
persons  and  groups  external  to  the  immediate  group,  such  as 
contributors,  prospective  members,  "pubKc  opinion." 

Groups  are  regrouped  in  larger  groups,  with  less  definite  bonds 
of  common  interest  but  interrelated  by  individuals  who  belong  to 
more  than  one  subgroup.     (See  Fig.  4.) 

Whether  a  purpose  is  ostensibly  or  actively  dominant  in  a 
group  depends  upon  the  general  social  situation,  which  therefore 

'  Cf.  Ordway  Tead,  Instincts  in  Industry. 


346 


THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OP  SOCIOLOGY 


determines  which  groups  "fall  off"  in  membership.  Large  circles 
in  the  diagram  indicate  roughly  larger  groups  or  classes  within 
which  there  are  certain  common  wishes  and  therefore  interlocking 
membership.  Each  smaller  group  is  symbolized  by  a  small  circle. 
Overlapping  circles  represent  interrelated  groups.  Infinite  dimen- 
sions would  be  needed  to  represent  the  actual  situation.     Net 


\_ev.\?ot;  Gtowpe> 


vests) 


Y 

PaltxoUstxx. 

Fig.  4. — Crude  symbol  of  group  interrelation  based  on  wish-fulfilment 

resultant  purposes  of  groups  are  indicated  by  heavy  arrows,  lesser 
motives  by  smaller  arrows.  The  direction  of  arrows  represents, 
in  a  crude  way,  the  direction  of  each  interest  with  relation  to  the 
broad  contrasts  between  social  classes. 

The  analogy  is  that  of  composition  of  forces  in  physics:  the 
class  purposes  are  resultants  of  group  purposes;  group  purposes 
are  resultants  of  individual  wills;  and  individual  wills  are  resultants 


GROUP  FORMATION  AND  BEHAVIOR  347 

of  the  conscious  and  unconscious  wishes  of  the  individual  in  relation 
to  any  given  situation. 

The  more  thorough  and  complex  the  system  of  interests  and 
of  interrelated  wish-fulfilling  groups,  the  more  "advanced"  the 
evolution  of  the  society.  Progress,  however,  of  course  involves 
increasingly  harmonious  and  economical  readjustments,  rather 
than  mere  complexity. 

Most  groups  in  present  society  require  money  or  work  for  their 
activities;  one's  "joinings"  and  the  social  fulfilment  of  wishes  go, 
therefore,  according  to  the  principles  of  comparative  marginal 
utilities  and  diminishing  returns.  Magazines,  parties,  athletics, 
churches,  alumni  associations,  festivals,  charities,  levels  of  the 
leisure  class,  come  to  mind  as  easy  examples.     (Cf.  Figs.  3,  4.) 

When,  however,  a  given  group  finds  a  "common  interest" 
in  some  unfulfilled  wish,  it  seeks  to  forward  its  purpose  by  increased 
membership.  If  there  be  two  groups  with  similar  ends,  there 
will  be  competition  for  membership  in  so  far  as  the  real  wishes 
are  selfish  to  each  group.  Frequently  this  involves  appeal  to 
different  motives  in  other  people,  who  may  thus  be  persuaded 
that  the  desired  result  will  also  fulfil  some  supposedly  legitimate 
wish  of  theirs.  This  leads  to  rationaHzation — the  writing  of 
plausible  publicity.  Witness  the  range  of  motives  appealed  to 
in  Liberty  Loan  or  prohibition  campaigns.  For  selfish  interests, 
however,  the  substitutions  and  excuses  furnished  are  usually  such 
as  to  appeal  to  some  motives  which  are  less  intense  but  more 
generally  shared  than  the  special  interest  which  primarily  motivates 
the  campaign.  The  suppressed  wish  then  gets  its  fulfilment  through 
some  less  inhibited  wish-channel.  The  ostensible  purpose  is  true  in 
a  sense,  but  less  dominant  or  dynamic,  and  not  alone  capable 
of  motivating  the  behavior  demanded  by  the  affect-laden  wish.' 

Hypocrisy  might  be  defined  in  terms  of  such  substitution. 
Thus,  a  self-analytic  person  may  feel  a  sense  of  guilt  (internal 
conflict,  repression)  when  perfectly  legitimate  motives  are  evenly 
balanced  or  mixed  in  his   conduct.     But,   on   the  other   hand, 

'  Cf.  Bernard  Shaw's  criticism  of  the  British  Ministry's  elaborate  justification 
of  war  in  contrast  with  the  popular  simplicity  of  motives,  or,  the  defense  of  tolerated 
prostitution  by  the  "best  citizens"  under  the  old  regime. 


348  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

the  selfish  motives  may,  by  these  very  processes,  become  sincerely 
obscured  or  secondary  in  the  minds  of  the  "disinterested"  or 
"indifferent"  people  whom  we  call  the  "public,"  in  relation  to  a 
given  issue. 

It  is  in  the  foregoing  way  that  political  and  economic  and 
even  moral  theories  gain  currency  and  power.  Some  theories 
are  advanced  "before  their  time":  i.e.,  they  do  not  rationalize 
the  cravings  of  an  existing  group.  Even  if,  in  origin,  they  be 
purely  "scientific"  (a  possibility  which  the  extreme  psychoanalyst 
might  deny),  theories  "prove  true"  only  in  so  far  as  they  meet 
and  rationalize  the  desires  of  a  successful  group.  Success  itself 
may  be  defined  in  terms  of  wish-fulfilment  or  organic  wish-harmony. 

GROUP  SOVEREIGNTY  AND  CONTROL 

A  well-organized  minority  in  a  group  gains  a  majority  by 
more  or  less  skilful  appeal  to  the  interests  of  the  bulk  of  the  group. 
Such  behavior  implies  a  previous  clear-cut  consciousness  of  common 
interest  on  the  part  of  the  dominant  minority  with  respect  to  some 
unfulfilled  desires,  and  especially  regarding  the  means  of  fulfil- 
ment which  has  been  thought  out  in  relation  to  those  desires. 
The  more  fundamentally  similar  the  unfulfilled  wishes,  the  more 
permanent  and  powerful  a  group  or  faction  is  likely  to  be. 

Sovereignty  or  power  rests  not  so  much  on  physical  force  as  in 
the  control  or  potential  release  of  force.  Ultimately,  dominant 
minorities  are  responsible  to  the  power  of  their  constituency. 
They  retain  control  of  that  power  by  catering  to  the  wishes  of  their 
followers;  by  use  of  the  father  image  or  mechanism  of  author- 
ity; by  skilfully  rationalized  theories  of  wish-fulfilment  through 
the  status  quo;  by  suppressing  facts  which  would  release  con- 
flicting impulses;  by  offering  substitute  expressions  for  anti- 
group  desires,  distractions  from  thwarted  needs,  or  promises, 
compromises,  and  sops;  or,  in  extremis,  preventing  new  minorities 
becoming  new  majorities  by  using  their  existing  power  to  prevent 
temporarily,  though  ultimately  to  increase,  the  development  of 
common  interest  and  collective  action  among  the  oppressed  vari- 
ants. The  Prussian  Militarist  Junkers  since  1849  have  furnished 
examples. 


GROUP  FORMATION  AND  BEHAVIOR  349 

GROUP   CONFLICT,    COMPROMISE,   AND  AMALGAMATION 

While  competition  for  membership  may  reach  the  point  of 
conflict  when  membership  becomes  an  end  in  itself,  group  conflicts 
are  usually  due  to  mutually  antagonistic  wishes,  either  with  respect 
to  a  common  interest  (such  as  hunting-grounds  or  a  doubtful  state), 
or  with  respect  to  some  policy  or  behavior  which  is  doing  or  will  do 
violence  to  the  interests  of  one  or  the  other  group  (such  as  trade 
relations  with  Russia). 

It  may  often  occur  that,  without  the  existence  of  another  group 
whose  "liberty"  (wish-fulfilment)  is  curtailed  by  the  very  existence 
of  its  antagonist,  either  group  would  be  entirely  "normal."  That 
is  why  the  ideal  business  man  and  the  ideal  socialist  are  both  so 
lovable  when  you  take  them  separately. 

When  two  groups  have  a  grievance  or  conscious  thwart  in 
common,  they  will  make  common  cause  in  their  immediate  activity, 
even  though  logically  at  odds  in  other  respects;  for  the  immediate 
activity  is  due  to  a  wish  which  strives  for  fulfilment  because  of 
some  current  stimulus  or  thwarting,  and  the  other  differences, 
being  less  insistent  for  adjustment  or  satisfaction,  are  subordinated 
or  suppressed  into  a  less  conscious  sphere.  Party  and  church, 
inter-college  and  sectional  rivalries,  inter-racial  and  international 
realignments,  especially  in  the  recent  and  present  wars,  suggest 
themselves  as  examples. 

Groups  with  a  similar  interest  not  selfish  to  each  group  but 
common  to  both  and  capable  of  joint  fulfilment  will  rapidly  and 
easily  amalgamate  in  the  absence  of  egotistic  minorities,  or  even- 
tually in  spite  of  them.  The  fusing  of  suffrage  organizations,  of 
parties,  and  of  corrupt  interests  are  examples  in  politics. 

When  two  groups  both  have  wishes,  and  their  fulfilment  is 
mutually  exclusive,  both  are  thwarted  acutely  and  there  is  war — 
orderly  or  violent  as  the  case  may  be.  It  is  a  function  of  civilized 
government  to  make  such  struggles  few  and  orderly.  Court 
decisions  and  arbitration  boards  attempt  to  harmonize  thwarted 
interests — and  occasionally  succeed.  They  repress  the  crude  pug- 
nacity of  injured  personalities  and,  theoretically,  give  it  a  channel 
for  relatively  sublimated  expression.  Legislation  and  treaties 
attempt  compromise,  reciprocal  concession,  and  substitution,  just 


3SO  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

as  a  mother  does  between  two  quarreling  children.  Reason  is,  for 
good  or  ill,  secondary  to  wish-fulfilment.  Witness  the  Peace 
Conference. 

The  so-called  "social  mind"  ordinarily  develops  more  slowly 
than  that  of  individuals,  because  there  are  infinitely  more  complex 
adjustments  and  readjustments  to  be  made  before  internal  friction 
can  be  eliminated  and  a  combination  or  organization  of  wishes 
can  be  found  which  will  afford  a  modus  vivendi — a  psychological 
basis  for  group  life, 

GROUP   SECESSION  AND   DECOMPOSITION 

If  a  person  finds  a  group  to  which  he  belongs  committed  to 
some  policy  or  conduct  which  would  thwart  another  of  his  interests 
he  may  have  a  mental  conflict.  He  must  take  his  choice.  He 
may  try  to  "swing  his  group. "  He  may  succeed  if  he  can  find  or 
create  a  powerful  enough  faction.  He  will  not  often  succeed  if 
there  is  a  real  thwart  or  "grievance"  widespread  and  dominant 
among  the  group.  The  most  plausible  arguments  will  not  much 
avail,  nor  will  the  most  logically  unanswerable  refutations  of  the 
group's  "reasons."  If  he  can  persuade  neither  himself  nor  the 
group  to  reconcile,  repress,  or  gloss  over  the  conflictive  wishes  he 
must  then  sacrifice  his  personal  wish  to  his  loyalty-wish  or  herd 
instinct;  or,  he  must  secede  or  "get  kicked  out,"  and  if  possible 
join  another  group,  whose  dominant  desires  are  simUar  to  his  own.* 

If  a  man  finds  two  groups  to  which  he  belongs  striving  for 
things  which  are  mutually  antagonistic  he  must  make  a  similar 
choice.* 

When  some  unforeseen  set  of  conditions  suddenly  thwarts  in  a 
large  number  of  people  a  certain  set  of  desires  which  were  pre- 
viously fulfilled  and  therefore  less  conscious,  new  groupings  are 
likely  to  develop,  old  groups  are  likely  to  "lose  interest,"  and 
alignments  shift  as  attention  concentrates  on  the  motives  now 
thwarted,  which  thereupon  become  the  dominant  motives  in  all 
group  activity.*    Old  grudges  now  repressed  project  their  cumula- 

'  The  opening  years  of  the  war  furnished  many  tragic  examples  of  these  gen- 
eralizations. In  groups  where  conjugation  or  fission  is  in  process,  whether  the  con- 
flict of  interests  is  considered  external  as  between  two  groups  or  internal  as  between 
factions  of  a  single  group  will  depend  upon  the  degree  to  which  consciousness  of 
conunon  interests  has  waxed  or  waned  in  the  social  mind. 


GROUP  FORMATION  AND  BEHAVIOR  351 

tive  affects  into  new  channels  and  upon  new  objects,  often  over- 
determining  the  new  group  behavior  all  unconsciously. 

IV 

Political  consent  and  "social  justice"  may  be  conceived  as  a 
function  of  the  amount  of  freedom  and  fulfilment  available  for  the 
wishes  and  interests  of  a  population.  For  intimidation  can  only 
prevent  rebellion  or  secession  by  making  the  instinct  of  self- 
preservation  dominant  over  all  thwarted  desires.  Fear,  if  it  be 
the  sole  sanction  of  a  government,  must  be  increased  at  an  acceler- 
ating rate;  for  thwarted  impulses  bring  concentration  of  thought 
and  feeling,  and  are  thereby  strengthened  even  while  they  are 
thwarted.  Fear,  therefore,  has  diminishing  returns,  reaches  its 
natural  limits  as  a  deterrent,  and  brings  revolution  or  crime. 
Justice,  on  the  other  hand,  is  the  harmonization  of  wishes  and  of 
wish-fulfilment. 

The  unitary  or  highly  centralized  state  finds  it  increasingly 
difficult  to  please  all  of  the  people  all  of  the  time.  The  "demo- 
cratic empire"  partly  solves  the  problem  through  local  geographic 
autonomy.  The  so-called  pluralistic  state  of  which  Laski  and 
others  are  wTiting  might  go  farther  in  the  same  direction,  by  a 
further  distribution  of  sovereignty  and  loyalty. 

Thought,  closer  study  of  the  environment,  theorizing,  point 
out  to  group  leaders  ways  in  which  the  unfulfilled  or  thwarted 
wishes  of  the  given  group  can  be  fulfilled,  if  possible  without 
thwarting  the  activities  or  desires  of  any  other  powerful  group. 
Still  closer  study  and  experience  may  prove  a  given  theory  "false," 
i.e.,  unworkable  or  provocative  of  worse  maladjustment,  but 
until  such  time  it  serves.  It  is  usually  for  or  against  the  beliefs 
of  others,  rather  than  their  desires,  that  the  favor  or  antagonism 
of  men  (at  least  ostensibly)  is  directed.  The  psychoanalyst 
might  call  this  process  "projection."  The  Christian  attacks 
ideas,  not  men.  We  cannot  often  "fight  it  out,"  so  we  attack 
each  other's  theories  and  try  to  "argue  it  out" — a  sublimated 
kind  of  fisticufi"s.  And  for  very  similar  sets  of  unfulfilled  wishes 
one  man  may  claim  economic  remedies,  another  political,  another 
religious.     The  various  arguments  about  slavery  and  crime  and 


352  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

freedom  of  speech  are  typical.  It  is  true  that  goods  and  services 
will  satisfy  most  wishes,  and  many  wishes  can  be  satisfied  in  no 
other  way.  This  is  the  real  rock  upon  which  the  economic  inter- 
pretation of  history  is  founded.  But  all  theories,  including  eco- 
nomic theory,  are  based  ultimately  upon  the  wishes  themselves* 
rather  than  upon  their  means  of  satisfaction,  which  is  itself  often 
the  subject  of  theorization;  and  the  theories  of  a  group  may, 
therefore,  in  some  cases  be  as  sincere  as  any  theory  can  be  when 
held  by  a  whole  group,  even  though  they  may  not  refer  to  eco- 
nomic changes,  appropriations,  or  acquisitions  necessary  to  their 
fulfillment. 

It  may  be  any  one  of  a  dozen  groups  of  impulses  in  unnumbered 
permutations  that  leads  to  a  social  theory  and  social  action,  and 
these  impulses  may  in  origin  be  entirely  non-economic  or  only 
indirectly  or  secondarily  economic.  The  social  hygiene  campaign, 
the  men  and  religion  forward  movement,  the  factory  legislation 
movement,'  are  possible  examples.  An  economic  basis  may,  to  be 
sure,  be  the  indispensable  condition  for  the  success  of  a  reform  of 
which  the  original  motive  was  sincerely  moral.  In  fact,  the 
economic  motive  is  frequently  used  by  social  workers  as  a  camou- 
flage for  altruistic  motives — witness  the  Bolshevik  bogey  and  the 
economic  argimients  for  playgrounds. 

But  only  where  the  economic  motive  is  recognized  as  or  accused 
of  being  selfish  or  wrong  does  conscience  or  social  censure  inhibit 
it  and  give  rise  to  camouflage  and  h>pocrisy.  And  for  such 
social  hysterias  pubUcity  and  discussion  furnish  the  salutary 
catharsis  of  the  body  politic  and  psychoanalysis  of  the  "public 
mind." 

'  Value  might  be  defined  in  terms  of  power  to  fulfil  or  thwart  wishes — one's  own 
or  others'. 

'  Certain  altruistic  wishes,  if  expressed  in  some  theory  which  if  acted  upon  would 
thwart  powerful  groups,  can  seldom  find  expression  except  in  people  who  can  "afiford 
to  be  radical."  The  same  wishes  may  be  present  in  others,  who  can  only  express  the 
same  wish  through  some  other  theory  which  justifies  the  wish  on  some  popular 
economic  grounds. 


CO-OPERATIVE  INVESTIGATION  AUTHORIZED 
BY  THE 
AMERICAN  SOCIOLOGICAL  SOCIETY 

We  wish  to  remind  you  of  the  investigation  described  briefly  in  the 
March,  1920,  number  of  the  Journal.  If  you  have  time  for  research 
work  or  if  you  direct  investigations  by  students,  we  hope  you  will  consider 
some  aspect  of  the  subjects  which  many  groups  will  be  studying  during 
the  coming  year.  Dr.  Lucile  Eaves,  the  director  of  this  first  co-operative 
study  authorized  by  the  Society,  will  give  assistance  by  correspondence, 
or  in  personal  conference  during  the  sessions  of  the  annual  meeting,  to  any 
members  of  the  Society  who  wish  suggestions  which  will  enable  them  to 
prepare  material  suitable  for  publication  in  the  final  report.  She  will  be 
glad  to  supply  the  questionnaires  used  by  the  full-time  workers  who  are 
investigating  the  subject  under  her  immediate  supervision. 

Professors  of  sociology  in  different  colleges  or  universities  will  be  the 
best  judges  of  the  abilities  of  their  students  and  resources  of  their  en- 
vironments, but  the  following  topics  may  prove  suggestive  when  discussing 
with  students  the  possibilities  of  co-operation  in  this  nation-wide  investi- 
gation: 

1.  Institutions  giving  care  to  aged  women. 

2.  The  policies  of  large  employers  of  women  in  dealing  with  older 
workers. 

3.  Study  of  women  who  have  left  positions  because  of  old-age 
incapacity. 

4.  Study  of  the  older  female  employees  to  discover  their  plans  for 
old-age  support. 

5.  Retired  school  teachers.  Are  their  pensions  adequate?  How 
are  they  being  cared  for? 

6.  Insurance  carried  by  self-supporting  women.  Do  they  buy 
annuities  ? 

7.  Women  depositers  in  savings  banks. 

8.  Family  relations  of  self-supporting  women. 

9.  Do  the  wages  of  women  permit  a  saving  for  old-age  support  ? 

10.  Interesting  plans  by  which  self-supporting  women  have  provided, 
or  are  planning  to  provide,  for  their  old  age. 

The  final  report  of  this  study  which  will  be  prepared  in  Boston  under 
the  direction  of  Miss  Eaves  will  be  a  great  pooling  of  experiences  for  the 
purpose  of  throwing  light  on  this  important  subject.  The  studies  made 
by  individual  contributors  should  be  limited  in  scope  but  should  cover 
completely  and  accurately  the  field  chosen. 

Address  correspondence  to  Miss  Lucile  Eaves,  264  Boylston  street 
Boston  17,  Mass. 

353 


ANNUAL  MEETING  OF  THE  AMERICAN  SOCIOLOGICAL 

SOCIETY 

The  following  program  has  been  announced  by  President  James 
Q.  Dealy  for  the  fifteenth  annual  meeting  of  the  American  Socio- 
logical Society  to  be  held  in  Washington,  D.C.,  December  27-29, 
1920.  At  the  same  time  and  place  the  following  organizations  will 
meet:  American  Historical  Association  and  related  organizations, 
American  PoHtical  Science  Association. 

MAIN  TOPIC   FOR  DISCUSSIONS:    "SOME   NEWER   PROBLEMS, 
NATIONAL  AND  SOCIAL" 

(All  meetings,  except  the  business  session,  are  open  to  the  public) 
Mo>fDAY,  December  27 

8:15  P.M.     Professor  Edward  A.  Ross,  University  of  Wisconsin,  presiding. 
Address:    "Eudemics,  a  Science  of  National  Welfare."    J.  Q. 
Dealey,  President  of  the  .\merican  Sociological  Society. 
Address:   "A    Theory    of    Social    Interests."    Dean    Roscoe 
Pound  of  the  Harvard  Law  School. 
Members  of  other  Associations  are  especially  invited  to  be  present. 

Tuesday,  December  28 

9:30  a.m.    Professor  Albion  W.  Small,  presiding. 

Address:  "The  Community  Idea  in  Rural  Development." 
President  Kenyon  L.  Butterpield,  Massachusetts  Agricultural 
College. 

Address:   "The  Inquiries  of  Sociology."    Professor  Franklin 
H.  Giddings,  Columbia  University. 
11:00  A.M.    Reports  of  Committees,  J.  Q.  Dealey,  presiding. 

Committee  on  the  Teaching  of  Social  Science  in  the  PubUc  and 
High  Schools.  Professor  Ross  L.  Finney,  Chairman, 
University  of  Minnesota. 

Committee  on  the  Standardization  of  Research:    Professor 
J.  L.  Gillin,  Chairman,  Um'versity  of  Wisconsin, 
Committee  on  Social  Abstracts:  Professor  F.  Stuart  Chapin, 
Chairman,  Smith  College. 
Discussion  of  these  reports. 
2:00  P.M.     Round  Table,  Professor  U.  G.  Weatherly  presiding. 

"Sociological  Significance  of  Psychoanalytic  Psychology."  In 
charge  of  Professors  Ernest  R.  Groves  and  C.  E.  Gehlke. 

354 


ANNUAL  MEETING  OF  THE  SOCIOLOGICAL  SOCIETY     355 

3:15  P.M.     Round  Table : 

"Essentials  of  a  Social  Survey  Plan."    In  charge  of  Professor 

Harold  S.  Bucklin  and  Dr.  Shelby  M.  Harrison. 
4:30  P.M.     Meeting  of  the  Executive  Committee. 
8:15  P.M.     Presidential   Addresses:    American  Historical   Association   and 

American  Political  Science  Association. 

Members  of  the  American  Sociological  Society  are  cordially 

invited  to  attend. 
10:00  P.M.     Smoker  at  Cosmos  Club,  open  to  members  of  all  the  Associations. 

Wednesday,  December  29 

9:30  a.m.    President  Kenyon  L.  Butterfield,  presiding. 

Address:    "Sociological  Evaluation  of  the  Interchurch  Move- 
ment."   Professor  Edwin  L.  Earp,  Drew  Theological  Seminary. 
Address :  ' '  The  Mexican  Revolution  and  the  Standard  of  Living. ' ' 
Professor  Max  S.  Handman,  University  of  Texas. 
II  :oo  a.m.    Professor  F.  W.  Blackmar,  presiding. 

Address:  "The  Social  Significance  of  Mental  Levels."  Professor 
J.  P.  Lichtenberger,  University  of  Pennsylvania. 
Address:    "The  New  Plan  of  Education  in  the  Army."     Pro- 
fessor Scott  E.  W.  Bedford,  University  of  Chicago. 

2:15  P.M.     Business  meeting  of  the  society. 

3:00  P.M.     Professor  Franklin  H.  Giddings,  presiding. 

Address:    "The  Family  in  Relation  to  Industry."     Professor 

Susan  M.  Kingsbury,  Bryn  Mawr  College. 

Address:   "Processes  of  Radicalism."    Professor  William  J. 

Kerby,  Cathohc  University  of  America. 

Address:   "The  Future  of  Sociology."    Professor  Albion  W. 

Small,  University  of  Chicago. 

7:00  P.M.  A  subscription  dinner,  under  the  auspices  of  the  American 
Historical  Association  and  the  American  Political  Science 
Association,  will  be  opened  by  courtesy  to  those  members  of 
the  American  Sociological  Society  who  desire  to  attend. 

Papers  should  not  exceed  20-25  minutes  in  length;  the  time  limit  for 
prepared  discussion  is  7  minutes;   for  discussion  from  the  floor  5  minutes. 

Local  committee  of  the  American  Sociological  Society:  Dr.  William  J. 
Kerby,  Catholic  University,  Chairman;  Miss  Julia  C.  Lathrop;  Dr.  Charles  J. 
Galpin;  Dr.  R.  R.  Kern;  Miss  Grace  Abbott. 

Local  committee  of  the  Historical  Association:  Dr.  H.  B.  Learned,  Chair- 
man; W.  B.  Bryan;  Miss  Frances  G.  Davenport;  Rev.  Dr.  Peter  Guilday; 
Gaillard  Hunt;  J.  Franklin  Jameson;  Constantine  E.  Maguire;  Charles  Moore; 
Helen  Nicolay;  Ruth  Putnam;  Admiral  Charles  H.  Stockton;  George  F.  Zook. 

Local  Committee  of  the  Pohtical  Science  Association:  Dr.  L.  S.  Rowe, 
Chairman;  Wilbur  Morse;   Dr.  W.  M.  Collier;   Mr.  William  F.  Culbertson; 


356  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

Mr.  Henry  James  Ford;  Rev.  Thomas  I.  Gasson;  Dr.  Franklin  Jameson; 
Dr.  C.  E.  Maguire;  Dr.  Henry  Learned;  Right  Rev.  Thomas  J.  Shahan; 
Dr.  Charles  D.  Walcott:  Dr.  W.  F.  Willoughby;  Dr.  James  Brown  Scott. 

The  privileges  of  the  National  Clubhouse  of  the  Association  of  Collegiate 
Alumnae,  1607  H  Street,  will  be  extended  to  the  women  of  the  various  associ- 
ations for  the  period  of  the  meetings.  Guest  cards  can  be  obtained  at  the 
headquarters  of  each  association. 

A  reception  for  the  members  of  the  various  associations  will  be  given  at  the 
National  Clubhouse  of  the  Association  of  Collegiate  Alumnae,  1607  H  Street, 
on  Tuesday  evening,  December  28,  beginning  at  nine-thirty. 

Headquarters. — The  headquarters  of  the  American  Sociological  Society 
will  be  The  Washington,  Pennsylvania  Avenue,  opposite  the  Treasury. 

Cars  from  the  station  pass  in  front  of  the  hotel. 

Hotel  accommodations  may  be  secured  as  follows: 
Hotel  Ehhitt 

Single  room  with  bath  $3.50  and  up;  without  bath  $2.00  and  $2.50. 
Double  room  with  bath  $6 .  00,  $7 .  00,  and  up.  Either  twin  beds  or  double 
beds.    Double  room  without  bath,  $4 .  00  and  $5 .  00. 

Hotel  New  Willard 

Single  room  with  bath  $5 .  00  and  up.  Without  bath  $3 .  00  and  up.  Double 
room  without  bath  $5.00  and  $6.00.  With  bath  $7.00  to  $12.00.  Double 
room  (twin  beds)  with  bath  $8 .  00  to  $1 2 .  00. 

Hotel  Raleigh 

Single  room  with  bath  $4 .  00  and  $5 .  00.    Without  bath  $3 .  00  and  $4 .  00. 
Double  room  without  bath  $4 .  00  and  $5 .  00     Without  bath  (twin  beds)  $6 .  00. 
Double  room  (twin  beds)  with  bath,  $5.00  to  $10.00. 
Hotel  Washington 

Single  room  with  bath,  $5 .  00  and  up.  Double  room  with  bath  (twin  beds) 
$8.00  to  $10.00.    Double  bed  $7 . 00 . 

Franklin  Square  Hotel 

Single  Room  $2.50;  single  room  with  bath  $3.50.     Double  room  $3.50; 
double  room  with  bath  $5.00. 
Shoreham  Hold 

Single  room  $3.00;  single  room  with  bath  $5.00.     Double  room  $5.00; 
double  room  with  bath  $7.00. 
Powhatan  Hotel 

Single  room  $3.00;   single  room  with  bath  $4.00.     Double  room  $4.50; 
double  room  with  bath  $6.00. 
Bellvue  Hotel 

Single  room  $2.00;  single  room  with  bath  $3.50.  Double  room  $3.00; 
double  room  with  bath  $5.00. 


NEWS  AND  NOTES 


Notes  of  interest  to  the  readers  of  the  Journal  should  be  in  the  hands  of  the 
editor  of  "News  and  Notes"  not  later  than  the  tenth  of  the  month  preceding 
publication. 

International  Review  of  Statistics 

Announcement  is  made  of  the  establishment  of  an  international 
review  of  statistics  entitled  Metron  imder  the  direction  of  Professor 
Corrado  Gini,  University  of  Padua,  Italy.  The  review  will  be  issued 
quarterly,  each  number  containing  180-200  pages.  It  will  contain 
original  articles  of  statistical  methodology  and  of  its  application  to 
various  branches  of  sciences,  and  reviews  of  or  discussions  on  the 
principal  results  obtained  by  statistical  methods  in  the  various  fields 
of  science  or  otherwise  interesting  statistics.  The  articles  and  reviews 
may  be  written  in  ItaUan,  French,  English,  and  German.  As  this 
review  is  pubhshed  in  Italy  and  consequently  a  majority  of  the  editorial 
stafif  are  Itahans,  no  doubt  the  ItaUan  language  will  at  first  preponderate 
in  its  pages.  But  the  other  great  international  languages  are  admitted 
to  its  pages  on  terms  of  complete  equahty.  It  rests  with  contributors 
from  other  countries  to  increase  their  share  in  its  pages  and  to  cause  to 
disappear,  any  such  difference.  It  is  the  wish  of  the  editors  that  the 
participation   of  non-ItaHan   writers  shall  become  larger  and  larger. 


United  States  Public  Health  Service 

The  PubUc  Health  Service  announces  the  organization  of  an  insti- 
tute on  the  control  of  venereal  diseases  to  be  held  in  Washington,  D.C., 
beginning  November  22  and  continuing  for  two  weeks.  Among  the 
courses  offered  are  "the  delinquent  women  and  the  law,"  "sex  in  educa- 
tion," "protective  work  for  girls,"  "sociology  and  social  hygiene," 
"methods  of  public  education,"  "methods  of  law  enforcement,"  "sex 
psychology,"  and  "clinical  social  work."  Among  the  forty  lecturers  and 
mstructors  are  the  following,  Dr,  John  A.  Fordyce,  Dr.  John  H.  Stokes, 
Dr.  Hugh  Young,  Dr.  Edward  L.  Keyes,  Jr.,  Dr.  Katherine  Bement 
Davis,  Mrs.  Martha  P.  Falconer,  Prof.  Maurice  A.  Bigelow,  Dr.  Thomas 
M.  Balliot,  and  Dr.  WiUiam  A.  White. 

357 


3S8  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

The  Survey 
The  Survey  announces  that  beginning  with  the  issue  for  October  2, 
1920  there  will  be  ofifered  a  special  type  of  service  to  teachers  and  students 
of  sociology,  economics,  social  ethics,  pohtics,  and  history.  This  depart- 
ment will  contain  a  "Social  Research  Outline"  based  on  current  social 
developments,  suggesting  definite  lines  of  investigations  and  offering 
bibhographical  helps  from  historical  and  correlated  current  materials. 
This  department  is  in  charge  of  Professor  Joseph  K.  Hart,  who  has  been 
professor  of  education  in  Reed  CoUege  and  has  recently  had  six  months 
experience  with  the  War  Camp  Community  Service. 


Baylor  University 
Mr.  Guy  B.  Johnson  has  been  appointed  as  an  assistant  in  the 
department  of  sociology.     Mr.  Johnson  will  have  charge  of  some  of  the 
extra  divisions  of  Sociology  i. 


Boston  University 
Professor  Ernest  R.  Groves,  head  of  the  department  of  sociology 
and  dean  of  the  arts  and  science  faculty  of  New  Hampshire  College, 
has  accepted  the  appointment  to  a  chair  of  sociology  in  the  department 
of  social  science.  

Brown  University 

Professor  Daniel  H.  Kulp  of  Shanghai  College  will  lecture  in  sociology 
at  Brown  University  during  the  second  semester  of  this  year.  He  will 
conduct  the  classes  of  Professor  Dealey,  who  plans  to  spend  several 
months  in  China  next  year. 

Professor  J.  Q.  Dealey  has  rewritten  and  enlarged  his  Sociology; 
the  new  edition  will  be  issued  in  October  through  Appleton  &  Co.  In 
January  through  the  same  firm  he  will  pubUsh  a  work  to  be  entitled 
TJie  Slate  atid  Government. 

Columbia  University 
A  new  book  by  Professor  Franklin  H.  Giddings,  entitled  Studies 
in  the  Theory  of  Human  Society  has  been  announced  by  the  Macmillan 
Company.  

New  York  State  College  of  Agriculture,  Cornell  Unr'^ersity 

In  the  department  of  Rural  Social  Organization  Mr.  E.  L.  Kirk- 

patrick,  who  has  recently  been  doing  graduate  work  in  sociology  in  the 


NEWS  AND  NOTES  359 

University  of  Kansas,  has  been  appointed  assistant  and  Mr.  C.  W. 
Whitney,  who  has  been  doing  graduate  work  at  the  University  of  Chicago, 
and  was  formerly  of  the  extension  staff  of  this  institution,  has  been 
appointed  extension  instructor.  Mr.  Whitney  will  give  special  attention 
to  extension  work  in  rural  recreation.  Professor  Dwight  Sanderson  is 
making  a  study  of  the  rural  neighborhoods  in  Otsego  County  in  co- 
operation with  the  division  of  Rural  Life  Studies,  Office  of  Farm 
Management  and  Farm  Economics,  United  States  Department  of 
Agriculture. 

Grinnell  College 

Mr.  Jakub  Horak,  of  the  University  of  Chicago,  has  accepted  a 
position  as  instructor  in  economics  and  sociology. 


Massachusetts  Agricultural  College 

Professor  Newell  L.  Sims,  formerly  of  the  University  of  Florida, 
now  occupies  the  chair  of  rural  sociology  in  this  institution,  having  been 
in  residence  since  the  first  of  the  year.  During  the  summer  Professor 
Sims  taught  courses  in  sociology  in  Columbia  University,  The  Journal 
has  recently  received  for  review  a  work  by  Dr.  Sims  entitled  "The 
Rural  Community,"  which  is  a  sourcebook  in  rural  sociology. 

The  Massachusetts  Agricultural  College  is  projecting  a  school  for 
the  training  of  rural  social  workers.  Announcement  of  the  plan  of 
work  will  be  made  in  the  near  future. 


University  of  Missouri 

Mr.  Royal  G.  Hall  who  was  an  instructor  in  the  University  of  Kansas 
during  the  summer  term  has  been  appointed  assistant  professor  of 
sociology.  He  will  have  charge  of  the  work  in  rural  sociology  which 
for  some  time  was  under  the  direction  of  Professor  C.  C.  Taylor  who 
recently  resigned. 

University  of  the  City  of  New  York 

Dr.  Maurice  Parmelee  has  been  appointed  by  the  Department  of 
State  of  the  United  States  as  Economic  Adviser  to  the  American  Com- 
mission in  Berlin.  Dr.  Parmelee  sailed  for  Europe  October  7.  His 
address  will  be,  %  American  Commission,  Berlin,  Germany. 


36o  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

Ohio  State  University 
Mr.  Warner  E.  Getty s,  instructor  in  sociology,  resigned  in  July  1920 
to  accept  a  position  in  sociology  in  Tulane  University.  Dr.  F.  E.  Lumley 
of  Butler  College,  Indianapolis,  Indiana,  was  appointed  assistant  professor 
in  sociology  for  the  current  year.  He  received  his  Ph.D.  at  Yale.  Miss 
Carrie  Wright,  A.M.  from  the  University  of  Chicago,  was  appointed 
an  assistant  in  sociology.  Mr.  H.  M.  Scott  was  also  appointed  an 
assistant  in  the  department  of  sociology. 


RocKFORD  College 
The  social  science  department  has  increased  its  staff  by  the  addition 
of  Miss  Florence  E.  Janson,  A.M.,  who  takes  the  courses  in  government 
and  introductory  economics.  Professor  Seba  Eldridge,  head  of  the 
department,  is  giving  an  extension  course  in  social  legislation  which  has 
special  reference  to  the  forthcoming  session  of  the  state  legislature. 
Labor  conditions,  public  health,  education,  housmg,  child  welfare  and 
care  of  the  feeble-minded  are  the  principal  topics  dealt  with.  It  is 
expected  that  the  results  of  the  investigations  undertaken  in  connection 
with  this  course  will  be  made  available,  in  printed  form,  to  legislators 
social  workers,  editors,  and  others  who  are  interested  in  the  problems 
considered. 

Smith  College 
The  Macmillan  Company  announces  the  publication  of  a  book 
entitled  Democracy  and  Assimilation:  the  Blending  of  Immigrant  Heritages 
in  America  by  Assistant  Professor  Julius  Drachsler. 


University  of  Southern  California 

Dr.  William  C.  Smith  is  offering  new  courses  this  semester  in  the 

field  of  ethnology,  race  psychology,  and  eugenics.     Mr,  M.  J.  Vincent 

has  been  appointed  instructor  in  sociology.     The  total  enrolment  in  the 

sociology^classes  this  semester,  inclusive  of  duplicate  enrohnents,  is  850. 


Southwestern  University 
Professor  John  C.  Granbery  has  terminated  three  years  of  war 
work  in  Europe  and  the  Near  East  (France,  Germany,  Old  and  New 
Greece)  under  the  auspices  of  the  Y.M.C.A.  He  has  resumed  his 
duties  in  Southwestern  University,  Georgetown,  Texas,  where  he  has 
the  chair  of  sociology  and  economics. 


NEWS  AND  NOTES  361 

Washburn  College 
The  department  of  sociology  in  Washburn  College  is  in  its  twentieth 
year.  It  has  a  department  library  of  slightly  over  4,000  volumes,  and 
nearly  4,000  lantern  slides,  as  illustrative  material,  including  a  new  acces- 
sion of  250  in  the  field  of  social  pathology,  just  purchased,  or  taken  from 
life,  in  New  York  City.  Dr.  D.  M.  Fisk  has  been  head  of  the  department 
for  twenty  years.  He  printed  three  of  his  texts  the  past  year — Sociology 
I.,  The  Sociology  of  Jesus,  and  The  Rise  of  Democracy. 


University  of  Washington 
The  department  of  sociology  has  been  reorganized  along  three  lines: 
(i)  anthropology  and  ethnology,  offering  fourteen  hours  per  quarter, 
under  Dr.  Leslie  Spier;  (2)  social  problems  and  methods  of  reconstruc- 
tion, offering  fourteen  hours  per  quarter  under  Associate  Professor 
McKenzie;  and  two  courses  of  field  work  imder  Miss  Olive  McCabe; 
(3)  social  theory  and  methods  of  investigation,  offering  the  general 
introductory  course  and  eight  hours  of  advanced  work  under  Professor 
Woolston,  assisted  by  Mr.  Herbert  Sturges. 


Western  Reserve  University 

Assistant  Professor  C.  E.  Gehlke  was  on  leave  for  a  year  serving  as 
educational  director  of  the  Southwestern  Division  of  the  American  Red 
Cross.  Recently  he  was  made  Director  of  the  Division  of  Statistics  of 
the  Cleveland  Foundation.  He  continues  his  work  in  the  department 
of  sociology,  but  will  give  half  of  his  time  to  the  supervision  of  the 
statistical  work  of  the  Foundation. 

Professor  J.  E.  Cutler  and  Assistant  Professor  C.  W.  Coulter  gave 
courses  in  the  summer  session  of  the  Cleveland  School  of  Education 
this  year.  Professor  Cutler  was  also  the  Director  of  the  Institute  of 
School  Hygiene  which  was  conducted  by  the  Cleveland  School  of 
Education  during  the  summer  session. 

Dr.  M.  R.  Davie  was  engaged  in  research  work  for  the  Cleveland 
Foundation  during  the  past  summer. 

Every  course  offered  by  the  department  of  sociology  is  being  given 
this  year.  The  number  of  students  who  have  elected  some  of  the  more 
general  courses  is  so  large  that  less  effective  methods  of  instruction  are 
likely  to  be  necessary.  In  common  with  the  experience  of  teachers  of 
the  social  sciences  in  other  American  universities  a  more  extensive  use 
of  the  lecture  method  seems  unavoidable. 


362  TEE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

University  of  Wisconsin 

W.  Russell  Tylor,  fellow  in  sociology  last  year  in  the  University  of 
Wisconsin,  has  been  appointed  as  assistant  in  sociology  to  assist 
Professor  J.  L.  Gillin  in  his  course  in  criminology. 

Dr.  J.  O.  Hertzler,  who  received  his  Doctor's  degree  in  sociology 
in  the  University  at  the  close  of  the  summer  session,  has  been  appointed 
instructor  in  economics  and  sociology  and  is  assistmg  Professor  Gillin 
in  his  course  in  social  origins.  The  niunber  in  both  these  courses  has 
become  so  large  that  it  is  impossible  for  one  man  to  handle  the  work 
properly. 

Professor  J.  L.  GUlin  is  to  give  a  course  of  lectures  to  the  Officers 
of  the  Wisconsin  State  Industrial  School  for  Boys  at  Waukesha  during 
the  coming  winter.  He  is  also  supervising  a  series  of  institutes  for  the 
training  of  volimteers  in  coimection  with  local  Associated  Charities 
at  a  number  of  places  in  Wisconsin.  The  course  will  occupy  a  month 
at  each  place  and  will  be  in  direct  charge  of  a  teacher  employed  by  the 
University  Extension  Division. 

Professor  J.  L.  Gilhn  expects  to  have  ready  for  the  pubUshers  about 
March  i,  a  textbook  on  Poverty  and  P  over  ism  and  Its  Treatment. 


The  American  Sociological  Society 

Since  the  cost  of  printing  the  American  Journal  of  Sociology  and 
the  Proceedings  of  the  Society  has  risen  to  almost  double  that  on  which 
current  arrangements  were  based,  and  since  it  was  necessary  to  advise 
members  in  advance,  in  order  that  renewals  might  be  made  without 
interruption  of  subscriptions,  the  Advisory  Council  of  the  Society  has 
taken  the  responsibility  of  assuming  that  the  annual  meeting  would 
indorse  an  advance  of  the  membership  fee  to  four  dollars  a  year. 


REVIEWS 


The  Spirit  of  Russia .    Studies  in  History,  Literature,  and  Philosophy. 

By  Thomas  Garrigue  Masaryk.    Translated  by  Eden  and 

Cedar  Paul.     New  York:    The  Macmillan  Company,   1919. 

2  vols.  Pp.  xxii+480;  xix+585.  $12.00  net. 
This  remarkable  work  by  the  president  of  Czecho-Slovakia  deserves 
the  attention  of  all  sociologists.  First  published  in  German  in  1913, 
it  is  one  of  the  few  books  which  the  Great  War  rendered,  not  out-of-date, 
but  prophetic.  The  title  of  the  work  is  unfortunate,  as  it  gives  Uttle 
idea  of  its  sociological  character.  It  is  really  a  history  of  Russian 
social  and  pohtical  thought,  though  the  first  half  of  the  first  volume 
is  taken  up  with  a  sketch  of  Russian  pohtical  history.  The  develop- 
ment of  Russian  sociology  receives  especial  attention,  and  the  whole 
history  of  Russian  social  and  pohtical  theories  is  sketched  in  a  masterly 
way,  with  a  wealth  of  learning  and  scholarship  which  astounds.  As 
one  reads,  one  is  made  to  reaHze  vividly  the  forces  which  lay  behind 
the  Russian  Revolution.  The  book  is  undoubtedly,  as  one  leading 
student  of  Russian  affairs  remarked  to  the  writer  of  this  notice,  the 
best  work  yet  produced,  though  written  several  years  before  the  event, 
for  the  understanding  of  the  Russian  Revolution.  It  is  much  more, 
therefore,  than  a  work  of  theoretical  and  historical  interest.  Its  por- 
trayal of  the  growth  of  that  revolutionary'  philosophy,  which  finally 
culminated  in  bolshevism,  and  of  the  political  and  economic  imbecilities 
which  stimulated  it,  has  a  tragic  interest  for  all  peoples  of  Western 
civilization.  If  we  would  avoid  Russia's  fate,  we  surely  need  to  learn 
from  her  mistakes. 

The  book  is  noteworthy  also  because  Dr.  Masaryk  does  not  hesitate 
to  discuss  questions  which  are  supposed  to  be  of  interest  only  to  technical 
sociologists.  As  regards  the  controversy  between  subjectivists  and 
objectivists,  for  example,  he  says,  "  My  decision  is  in  favor  of  a  mitigated 
subjectivism,"  meaning  by  that,  of  course,  that  he  holds  that  it  is  the 
social  mind,  the  social  tradition,  the  mores  which  immediately  determine 
social  behavior.  In  accordance  with  this  position,  though  a  critic  of 
existing  forms  of  organized  religion,  he  finds  that  great  importance  must 
be  attributed  to  religion  in  the  social  process  as  the  sustainer  of  the 
mores.     "Religion,"  he  says,  "constitutes  the  central  ajid  centralizing 

363 


364  TEE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OP  SOCIOLOGY 

mental  force  in  the  life  of  the  individual  and  of  society.  The  ethical 
ideals  of  mankind  are  formed  by  religion ;  religion  gives  rise  to  the  mental 
trend,  to  the  life-mood  of  human  beings."     (Vol.  II,  p.  557.) 

This  is  only  a  slight  indication  of  the  sociological  interest  of  this 

book. 

Charles  A.  Ellwood 
UNTVERsmr  OP  Missouri 


The  Skilled  Labourer,  1760-1832.    By  J.  L.  and  Barbara  Ham- 
mond.    London:  Longmans,  Green  &  Co.,  1919.  Pp.  ix+397. 

$4-5o- 

There  is  a  tendency  among  the  newer  historians  to  look  for  a 
broader  group  of  causations  than  is  to  be  found  in  governments  and 
politicians,  and  to  listen  to  the  half -articulate,  confused,  voices  of  the 
larger  groups  of  the  "lower  orders"  for  an  explanation  of  the  dominant 
element  in  historical  development.  Of  course  the  poUtician  is  no  less 
really  important  than  before,  and  so  strangely  is  our  world  organized 
that  a  generation  may  show  more  modification  from  the  quarrel  of 
a  duke  with  a  party  leader  than  from  the  fall  of  wages  a  shilling  per 
week.  Yet  there  is  a  growing  conviction  that  if  we  are  really  to  under- 
stand the  life-story  of  a  people  through  the  course  of  a  century,  we  must 
learn  how  things  went  with  the  great  substratum  upon  which  the  more 
talkative  part  of  society  rests. 

It  is  to  this  newer  class  of  histories,  which  form  the  province  almost 
equally  of  the  historian,  the  sociologist,  and  the  economist,  that  The 
Skilled  Labourer  belongs.  It  is  the  last  of  a  trilogy  of  books  dealing 
with  the  intimate  history  of  the  British  laboring  man  in  the  time  of 
the  great  flux  caused  by  the  Industrial  Revolution.  The  first  volume, 
The  Village  Labourer,  appeared  in  191 1.  The  present  volume  has  a 
general  conmiunity  of  subject-matter  with  the  second  of  the  series, 
The  Town  Labourer,  but  the  aim  is  here  at  telling  more  in  detail  the 
experiences  of  particular  labor  groups  during  the  period  whose  general 
characteristics  The  Town  Labourer  attempts  to  treat.  It  is,  in  fact,  a 
series  of  group  case-studies  selected  where  evidence  was  found  fullest, 
and  covering  groups  as  diverse  as  pitmen  in  coal  mines,  and  silk-stocking 
weavers. 

It  has  been  the  plan  of  the  authors  to  trace  the  developments  in 
each  of  these  trades  and  subgroups  as  a  unit  of  study.  Such  a  plan 
involves  obvious  difficulties  of  presentation.  Despite  the  unity  of 
causes  which  makes  the  experience  of  the  different  groups  very  similar, 


REVIEWS  365 

one  feels  that  the  interrelations  between  them  are  left  hazy.  A  reading 
of  The  Town  Labourer,  at  least,  is  presupposed.  So,  despite  the  singu- 
larly felicitous  style  which  is  the  endowment  of  the  Hammonds,  and 
despite  the  human  interest  of  the  book,  it  will  not,  probably,  prove  as 
charming  to  the  general  reader  as  The  Village  Labourer. 

The  book  is  written  to  substantiate  a  thesis.  That  thesis  is  frankly 
stated  on  page  four  of  the  Introduction .  '  'For  all  these  classes  of  workers 
it  is  true  that  they  were  more  their  own  masters,  that  they  had  a  wider 
range  of  initiative,  that  their  homes  and  their  children  were  happier 
in  1760  than  they  were  in  1830."  The  immediate  cause  was  the  intro- 
duction of  machinery  into  most  lines  of  industry.  Its  influence  was 
felt  by  those  already  on  the  verge  of  pauperism,  but  more  by  the  more 
skilled  whose  closed  crafts  no  longer  saved  them  from  ruin.  The 
effect  was  so  similar  upon  the  different  groups  that  it  gives  a  unity 
to  the  story  of  the  period.  Into  one  general  class  of  depression  may 
be  put  cotton  and  woolen  workers,  spinners  and  weavers,  worsted 
workers  and  stocking  knitters,  lace  makers  and  the  shearmen  who 
cut  the  nap  from  woolen  cloth  in  the  finishing  process.  Each  group 
has  its  own  story  told,  but  it  differs  from  the  others  only  in  the  detail 
of  local  circumstance.  In  each,  machines  appeared  which  made  the 
labor  of  a  few  men  vastly  more  productive.  As  soon  as  one  manu- 
facturer adopted  such  a  device  his  competitors  were  compelled  to  do 
likewise.  With  the  machinery  went  what  seemed  to  be  a  new  spirit  in 
the  manufacturing  group.  It  was  made  manifest  by  better  co-operation 
of  the  manufacturers,  and  often  by  shady  trade  practices,  such  as 
flooded  the  market  with  worthless  knitted  goods  about  1810.  Volume 
of  production  increased,  "time  was  saved,"  yet  the  laborers  foimd 
themselves  working  more  hours  per  day  for  less  wages  in  a  factory, 
or  starving  on  poor  relief  in  their  cottages.  No  wonder  those  in  the 
old  domestic  industries  "no  longer  had  the  heart"  to  do  work  which 
had  ceased  to  be  remunerative.  In  some  industries  the  mechanization 
was  slower  than  in  others.  In  some  locahties  resistance  held  back 
the  process  for  a  time.  But  in  general  it  spread  as  relentlessly  as  an 
infection. 

The  resistance  was  the  more  hopeless  because  the  period  of  change 
coincided  with  a  period  dominated  by  war  psychology.  A  govern- 
ment which  was  at  once  the  champion  of  national  integrity  and  class 
interest  used  the  power  of  its  position  without  much  scruple.  It  put 
down  violence  with  the  iron  hand,  and  it  forbade  by  law  the  combi- 
nations of  workers  that  might  have  secured  redress  without  resort  to 
violence. 


366  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

Desperate,  unable  to  make  themselves  heard  politically,  the 
North  made  itself  felt  in  the  Luddite  riots  of  1811  and  181 2,  and  again 
when  the  close  of  the  war  was  found  only  to  make  miser>'  the  more 
apparent.  The  insurrectionary  tendencies  were  hopeless.  To  some 
extent  they  were  prompted,  as  they  were  betrayed,  by  government 
spies.  With  their  collapse,  and  the  beginnings  of  a  hope  that  parUa- 
mentar>'  reform  would  bring  relief,  this  chapter  of  the  labor  Ufe  of 
England  closes. 

The  case  of  the  coal  miners  of  the  Wear  and  the  Tyne  is  an  exception 
to  the  general  rule.  They  faced  an  impossible  situation  caused,  not 
by  new  machinery,  but  by  improved  organization  on  the  part  of  their 
employers.  Inexperienced  as  they  were,  they  seemed  for  a  time  likely 
to  improve  their  position.  But  their  final  defeat  is  typified  by  Hepburn, 
their  best  leader,  who  was  driven  by  hunger  to  purchase  work  from  his 
old  foes  at  the  price  of  a  pledge  to  organize  no  more. 

This  exception  is  important  as  showing  that  the  real  root  of  evil 
was  not  the  introduction  of  machinery — though  the  idea  is  left  inchoate 
by  the  Hammonds.  The  real  evil  was  the  concentration  of  political 
power  in  the  hands  of  the  same  class  which  was  just  realizing  its  oppor- 
tunities for  unprecedented  economic  exploitation.  It  must  be  felt  that 
the  authors  are  too  bitter  against  an  innovation  whose  immediate 
effect  was  blighting,  but  which  compelled  men  to  new  experiments  in 
co-operation  for  control,  which  promise  to  make  of  the  new  technique 
a  means  for  the  attainment  of  more  liberty,  a  wider  range  of  initiative, 
and  happier  homes  and  famiUes  than  were  known  in  1760,  or  at  any 
other  time. 

Warner  F.  Woodring 
UNivERsrrY  OF  Chicago 


Social  Purpose:    A  Contribution  to  a  Philosophy  oj  Civic  Society. 

By  H.  J.  W.  Hetherington  and  J.  H.  Muirhead.     New 

York:  The  Macmillan  Company,  1918.     Pp.317.     $3.50  net. 

It  is  difficult  to  understand  why  these  lectures,  delivered  before 

the  University  College  of  Wales  in  the  summer  of  1916,  were  published 

in  book  form.     The  avowed  purpose  of  the  book  is  "to  restate  the 

essentials  of  the  classical  idealist"  of  society  (p.   10).     To  this  end 

Plato  and  Aristotle  are  made  starting-points  for  the  discussion  of  present 

civic  society.     While  there  is  much  good  sense  in  the  discussion,  it 

seems  quite  out  of  touch  with  the  spirit  of  modern  science.     It  would 

be  unfair  to  say  that  the  book  ignores  the  whole  development  of  scientific 


REVIEWS  367 

psychology  and  sociology,  but  it  makes  little  use  of  their  methods  of 
approach  to  its  problems.  Rather  its  method  is  still  that  of  "dialectic." 
Only  one  American  sociologist  receives  any  attention,  Professor  Cooley. 
Blackmar  and  Gillin's  text  is  cited  once,  but  the  names  are  given  in  the 
footnote  as  "Blackmore  and  Gillen"  and  in  the  index  as  "Blackmore 
and  Sillers." 

The  attitude  of  the  book  toward  objective  scientific  method  seems 
to  be  well  indicated  by  the  following  quotation  from  Professor  J.  A. 
Smith,  which  the  authors  place  just  before  their  own  preface:  "The 
world  of  fact,  artistic  or  aesthetic,  scientific,  moral,  political,  economic, 
is  what  the  spirit  builds  around  itself,  creating  it  out  of  its  own  sub- 
stance, while  it  itself  in  creating  it,  grows  within Nothing  is  or 

can  be  alien,  still  less  hostile  to  it,  'for  in  wisdom  it  has  made  them  all.'  " 

Uniyersity  of  Missoxmi  Charles  A.  Ellwood 

Personal  Beauty  and  Racial  Betterment.  By  Knight  Dunlap. 
St.  Louis:   C.  V.  Mosby  Company,  1920.     Pp.  95.     $1.00. 

The  point  of  view  of  this  book  in  eugenics  is  that  of  an  experi- 
mentalist in  physiological  psychology.  Personal  beauty  is  defined  as 
the  evidence  of  fitness  for  "the  function  of  procreating  healthy  children 
of  the  highest  type  of  efficiency  according  to  the  standards  of  the  race, 
and  ability  to  protect  these  children,"  The  author  inadequately 
justifies  his  omission  of  moral  qualities  in  his  description  of  "the  beauti- 
ful individual."  The  chief  suggestions  in  the  author's  program  of  racial 
betterment  are:  eliminating  the  unfit  through  the  use  of  education 
and  publicity,  insuring  that  marriages  shall  be  made  on  the  basis  of 
mutual  attraction  of  "beauty"  alone,  taking  care  that  the  xmions  of 
the  most  fit  shall  be  fruitful. 

This  "personal  beauty"  treatment  of  eugenics  contains  several 
generalizations  which  are  open  to  challenge.  For  example:  All  dark 
races  prefer  white  skin  (p.  20).  The  basis  of  power  is  muscular  (p.  25). 
In  a  family  one  person  must  control  (p.  27).  Language  is  the  principal 
means  of  thinking  (p.  31). 

E.  S.  BOGARDUS 

University  of  SoxriHERN  California 


Current  Social  and  Industrial  Forces.     Edited  by  Lionel  D.  Edie. 

New  York:  Boni  and  Liveright,  1920.     Pp.  xv+393.     $2.50. 

This  is  an  interesting  and  valuable  collection  of  source  material 

prepared  for  courses  on  "Current  Historical  Forces"  in  the  history 


368  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

department  of  Colgate  University,  It  has  distinct  value,  also,  for 
courses  in  sociology  and  economics. 

The  book  carries  an  introduction  by  James  Harvey  Robinson,  who 
concludes  with  the  following  admirable  characterization  of  Professor 
Edie's  work:  "His  anthology  forms  a  really  imposing  stock-taking  of 
current  speculation  upon  pressing  economic  quandaries.  It  does  not 
attempt  to  prove  anything  or  defend  anything,  except  the  necessity 
of  considering  the  pass  in  which  humanity  finds  itself  with  the  hope  that 
with  new  knowledge  and  fuller  understanding  our  pohcies  of  reform  may 
be  more  prompt  and  less  bunghng  and  expensive  than  they  might 
otherwise  be."  Professor  Robinson  is  also  represented  by  a  six-page 
quotation  from  his  The  New  History. 

About  sixty  writers  are  represented,  besides  numerous  reports  and 
official  documents.  Hobson  leads  the  field  with  five  quotations,  fol- 
lowed by  Weyl  and  Croly  with  four,  and  Veblen,  Bloomfield,  King, 
Bertrand  Russell,  Hoxie,  Wallas,  and  Woodrow  Wilson,  with  three 
each.  The  following  chapter  headings  indicate  the  arrangement  of 
the  material:  I.  "Forces  of  Disturbance";  II.  " PotentiaUties 
of  Production";  III.  "The  Price  System";  IV.  "The  Direction  of 
Industry";  V.  The  Funds  of  Reorganization";  VI.  "The  Power  and 
PoUcy  of  Organized  Labor";  VII.  "Proposed  Plans  of  Action"; 
VIII.    "Industrial  Doctrines  in  Defense  of  the    Status  Quo";    IX. 

"The  PossibiUties  of  Social  Service." 

Robert  Fry  Clark 


Pacific  University 


A  Group-Discussion  Syllabus  of  Sociology.  By  Daniel  B.  Leary, 
Ph.D.  Buffalo:  University  of  Buffalo,  Niagara  Square,  1920. 
Pp.  42.     $1.00. 

Dr.  Leary,  professor  of  psychology  in  the  University  of  Buffalo, 
has  contributed  to  the  steadily  increasing  materials  for  the  teaching 
of  introductory  college  courses  in  sociology  by  preparing  a  syllabus 
of  thirty-two  sections,  containing  five  to  eight  questions  each,  and 
supplemented  by  reading  references.  The  point  of  view  is  "objective, 
historical,  non-individualistic,  dynamic."  Social  evolution,  social  con- 
trol, and  social  problems  are  the  main  sub-divisions.  An  extended 
bibUography  is  prefixed.  The  syllabus  is  designed  for  the  use  of  mature 
students.  The  questions,  which  constitute  the  chief  contribution  of 
the  syllabus  are  as  a  rule  well  phrased.  At  times  they  stress  philosophic 
rather  than  scientific  considerations. 

University  of  SoxnmRN  California  ^-  ^-  BOGARDUS 


REVIEWS  369 

The  American  Red  Cross  in  the  Great  War.    By  Henry  B .  Davison. 
New  York:    The  Macmillan  Company,  1920.    Pp.  xii+303. 

$2.00. 
*  This  book  by  the  chairman  of  the  War  Council  appointed  by 
President  Wilson,  also  president  of  the  Red  Cross,  is  a  clear  and  fasci- 
nating recital  of  the  work  of  the  Red  Cross  from  the  outbreak  of  the 
war  between  the  United  States  and  Germany  in  1917.  It  begins  with 
the  story  "When  the  Storm  Burst"  and  closes  with  an  account  of  the 
League  of  Red  Cross  Societies. 

Sitting  at  the  very  center  where  every  move  in  the  development 
of  the  Red  Cross  from  a  small  society  with  only  six-himdred  chapters 
and  a  few  thousand  members  at  the  outbreak  of  the  war  to  one  with 
over  thirty-seven  hundred  chapters  and  twenty-two  miUion  members 
at  the  time  of  the  signing  of  the  armistice,  Mr.  Davison  is  well  equipped 
to  tell  the  story  of  this  great  organization.  He  tells  it  well.  As  one 
reads  the  first  few  chapters  which  describe  the  expansion  of  the  organi- 
zation to  meet  the  obUgations  laid  upon  it  by  the  government  in 
accordance  with  its  charter,  he  feels  again  the  breathless  haste  and 
high  resolve  which  moved  us  all  as  the  nation  girded  itself  for  the  battle 
with  its  foe.  The  organization  and  reorganization  which  characterized 
the  first  months,  the  chaos  which  reigned  and  withal  the  order  which 
finally  evolved,  the  devotion  of  rich  and  poor  in  the  various  services  of 
the  Red  Cross,  the  building  of  buildings  in  camps,  the  selection  of 
personnel,  crowding  upon  the  organization  with  a  prodigaUty  which 
created  a  real  problem,  and  the  enhsting  of  nurses  and  social  workers 
for  Europe  and  America — all  is  here  portrayed  in  vivid  and  fascinating 
form. 

Mr.  Da\dson  divides  his  work  into  two  parts,  the  first  deahng  with 
the  work  of  the  Red  Cross  in  America — work  for  the  soldier  and  sailor 
at  home,  home  service,  the  work  of  the  Junior  Red  Cross,  and  the  care 
of  the  disabled  soldier;  the  second  part  dealing  with  the  work  of  the 
Red  Cross  abroad,  in  Italy,  in  France,  m  Great  Britain,  and  in  Eastern 
Europe.  The  book  is  not  a  critical  history;  it  is  a  report  by  one  who 
was  the  directing  genius  in  its  war  organization,  the  War  Council. 
It  is  to  be  hoped  that  sooner  or  later  it  may  be  supplemented  by  a  more 
critical  study  of  the  work  of  the  Red  Cross,  pointing  out  not  only  the 
achievements,  but,  what  is  of  as  much  value  to  those  who  would  learn 
also  from  its  mistakes,  also  its  errors  of  judgment,  where  it  failed  in 
its  organization  and  in  its  highly  centralized  control  in  the  division 


370  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

ofl5ces,  what  can  be  learned  from  the  fact  that  in  the  early  days,  at 
least,  it  was  manned  by  volunteers,  and  from  the  fact  that  the  managers 
and  many  of  its  divisional  heads  of  departments  were  "  big  business  "  men. 

J.  L.  GiLLIN 

University  of  Wisconsin 


The  Human  Costs  of  the  War.  By  Homer  Folks.  With  illustra- 
tions by  Lewis  W.  Hine.  New  York:  Harper  Bros.,  1920. 
Pp.  1-325.     $2.25. 

BeUeving  that  only  an  "infinitesimal  fraction  of  reality"  concerning 
the  suffering  of  war-stricken  Europe  has  ever  found  its  way  into  print, 
the  author  assays  an  adequate  appraisal  of  the  damages  to  humanity 
which  the  war  brought. 

On  the  basis  of  a  survey  made  by  himself  and  staff  following  the 
armistice,  a  picture  of  the  people  of  Serbia,  Belgium,  France,  Italy, 
and  Greece  as  the  war  left  them  is  drawn.  The  results  in  terms  of 
childhood,  home,  and  health  are  then  effectively  summarized,  and  a 
chapter  on  "War  versus  WeKare"  concludes  the  book. 

Written  for  the  general  reader,  the  book  gives  a  vivid  impression 
of  the  appalling  cost  of  the  war  in  life  and  suffering.  Although  mostly 
estimates,  the  data  are  perhaps  as  accurate  as  any  we  shall  ever  get. 

The   survey   is   somewhat   defective,   however,   because   confined 

chiefly  to  the  five  lands  named,  and  would  have  been  more  valuable 

had  all  the  belligerent  countries  been  included. 

Newell  L.  Sims 
Amherst,  Mass. 

British  Labor  Conditions  and  Legislation  During  the  War.    Carnegie 

Endowment  for  International  Peace.     Division  of  Economics 

and  History.  "Preliminary  Studies  of  the  War,  No.  14."     By 

M.   B.   Hammond.     New   York:    Oxford   University   Press, 

1919.     Pp.   v+335.     Bound,  for  $1.00;    paper,  gratis    from 

Carnegie  Endowment  for  International  Peace. 

This  study  of  labor  conditions  and  labor  legislation  in  Great  Britain 

during  the  war  gives  us  in  convenient  form  a  great  deal  of  information 

regarding  the  changes  in  trade  unionism,  unemployment,  wages,  hours 

of  labor,  welfare  work,  relation  of  the  government  to  labor,  and  other 

labor  problems.     The  author  states  that  it  is  purposely  "a  narration 

rather  than  an  interpretation"  but  he  presents  enough  of  the  historical 

background  to  make  the  book  intelligible  to  persons  not  acquainted 


REVIEWS  371 

with  earlier  conditions  in  England.  It  is  a  book  of  importance  because 
of  the  significant  changes  that  took  place  during  the  war,  and  also 
because  the  interruption  of  communication  with  Europe  during  the 
war  made  it  impossible  for  us  by  the  ordinary  methods  to  keep  up  with 
the  changes  in  this  field  of  labor  problems. 

E.  H.  Sutherland 
University  of  Illinois 


Consumers'  Co-operation.    By  Albert  Sonnichsen,  New  York: 
The  Macmillan  Company,  1919.     Pp.  xix+223.     $1.75. 

In  this  Httle  volume  the  author  has  attempted  to  write  a  brief 
history  of  the  co-operative  movement  explaining  in  detail  the  relation- 
ship between  consumers'  co-operation  and  productive  co-operation, 
farmers'  co-operative  societies,  profit-sharing,  labor  copartnership, 
etc.  In  part  two  of  the  book  he  discusses  consumers'  co-operation 
and  the  labor  movement  and  consumers'  co-operation  and  socialism. 

In  tracing  the  early  history  of  co-operation  he  indicates  very  clearly 
his  sympathy  for  consumers'  co-operation  as  against  all  other  forms  of 
co-operation  which  must  be  tolerated  as  a  part  of  the  co-operative 
movement  however  irrational  or  inconsistent  their  programs  are.  Con- 
sumers' co-operation  will  succeed  when  the  Rochdale  principles  are 
followed  and  when  all  other  factors  political,  economic,  and  social  are 
excluded  from  the  program.  The  above  is  another  of  many  attempts 
which  have  been  made  to  explain  why  consumers'  co-operation  has 
uniformly  failed  in  the  United  States  with  the  exception  of  the  recent 
experiments  which  have  not  had  time  to  demonstrate  whether  they  will 
endure  or  not.  However  much  we  may  wish  to  see  consumers' 
co-operative  societies  succeed,  in  the  light  of  American  experience  we 
cannot  accept  his  enthusiastic  conclusion  that  consumers'  co-operative 
societies  will  always  succeed  when  estabUshed  on  the  Rochdale  principles. 

In  the  author's  discussion  of  the  Purity  Co-operative  Bakery  of 
Paterson,  N.  J.,  the  author  states  that  the  Federal  Food  Control  Board 
fixed  the  price  of  bread  at  a  point  which  enabled  this  society  to  make 
too  much  money  and  although  the  Federal  Food  authorities  were 
appealed  to  they  would  not  change  their  ruling  with  reference  to  the 
price.  In  the  interests  of  accuracy  the  price  of  bread  in  each  state 
was  not  fixed  by  the  National  Federal  Authorities  but  by  the  State 
Federal  Authorities  and  the  prices  fixed  were  usually  maximum  prices. 
Nearly  everywhere  chain  stores  and  others  sold  bread  at  prices  below 
the  maximum  fixed  by  the  authorities  of  the  Food  Administration. 


372  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

The  author  has  a  keen  imagination  to  conclude  that  the  political 
views  of  Thomas  Jefferson  are  very  similar  to  those  of  Michael  Bakunin 
and  Lenine. 

The  book  is  well  written  and  is  a  clear  exposition  of  consumer's 
co-operation, 

J.  E.  Hagerty 

Ohio  State  University 


The  Human  Factor  in  Industry.  By  Lee  K.  Frankel  and 
Alexander  Fleisher.  New  York:  The  Macmillan  Com- 
pany, 1920.    Pp.  366.    $3.00. 

This  work  is  a  sweeping  survey  of  the  popular  and  technological 
literature  covering  selected  problems  in  the  field  of  personnel  admin- 
istration. The  authors  have  given  us  very  httle  that  is  new,  either 
in  point  of  view  and  method  of  analysis  or  in  subject-matter.  The 
text  is  organized  around  a  Ust  of  subjects  including:  "Hiring  and 
Holding";  Education";  "Working  Hours";  Working  Conditions"; 
"Medical  Care";  "Methods  of  Remuneration";  Refreshment  and 
Recreation";  "The  Employer  and  the  Community";  "Insurance, 
Savings,  and  Loans  " ;  "Organization  of  the  Department  of  Labor  Admin- 
istration." Each  of  these  subjects  is  developed  by  describing  the 
current  industrial  practices  as  revealed  in  the  Uterature  of  the  subject. 
There  is  Uttle  searching  of  these  practices  to  discover  and  formulate 
the  fundamental  principles  and  policies  that  must  be  developed  before 
either  a  satisfactory  science  or  art  of  personnel  administration  can  be 
developed.  By  definition,  the  authors  exclude  some  of  the  most  trouble- 
some problems  and  conditions  that  confront  the  industrial  manager. 
Labor  administration  is  defined  as  "those  activities  carried  on  by 
employers  and  employees  jointly  or  separately  which  benefit  both, 
have  as  their  unit  the  industrial  plant  and  are  not  enforced  by  law 
or  by  organized  labor."  There  may  well  be  difference  of  opinion  as 
to  the  relations  that  should  be  established  with  organized  labor,  but 
it  seems  highly  artificial  to  remove,  by  definition,  this  problem  from  the 
field  of  personnel  administration.  Neither  is  it  correct  to  assume,  as 
the  authors  do,  that  labor  legislation  and  union  activities  are  merely 
negative  factors.  No  small  part  of  the  progress  made  in  matters  of 
labor  administration  has  been  the  direct  result  of  the  activities  of  these 
agencies. 

Although  there  is  little  in  this  book  to  interest  the  more  sophisticated 
students  of  labor  administration,  it  is  a  valuable  survey  for  the  general 


REVIEWS  373 

reader  and  for  those  industrial  managers  who  have  not  had  time  to 
keep  abreast  of  the  developments  to  date. 


R. W.  Stone 


State  University  of  Iowa 


The  Science  of  Labour  and  Its  Organization.  By  Dr.  Josefa 
lOTEYKO.  New  York:  E.  P.  Button  &  Co.,  1919.  Pp. 
viii+196.     $1.60. 

In  this  little  volume  are  collected  a  series  of  articles,  pubUshed  in 
certain  French  journals  in  19 16  and  191 7,  and  the  substance  of  certain 
lectures  on  fatigue,  delivered  at  the  College  de  France.  The  author 
seeks  in  this  collection  to  throw  hght  upon  certain  points  in  industrial 
psycho-physiology.  To  the  results  accomplished  by  research  into  the 
working  of  the  bodily  organs  with  the  view  to  discover  their  best  working 
conditions,  to  detect  fatigue,  and  to  lay  down  a  basis  for  industrial 
work,  he  applies  the  caption  "Science  of  Labour."  The  book  is  a 
summary  of  experiments  and  researches  into  the  physiological  and 
psychological  aspects  of  personnel  administration. 

The  discussion  is  divided  into  four  parts.  The  first  is  concerned 
with  the  problems  of  apprenticeship,  the  economical  methods  of  working, 
and  the  measurement  of  industrial  fatigue.  The  second  part  is  an 
evaluation  and  criticism  of  scientific  management.  Particular  emphasis 
is  placed  upon  the  shortcomings  of  the  Taylor  system  in  respect  to 
psycho-physiological  factors.  The  third  part  presents  data  bearing 
upon  the  human  power  and  aptitudes  for  work.  The  final  section  is 
devoted  to  an  exposition  of  the  Belgian  methods  of  technical  education. 

The  work  is  by  no  means  a  complete  or  final  analysis  of  the  personnel 
problems  in  industry.  It  is,  however,  a  contribution  to  the  literature 
on  that  subject.  Those  interested  in  the  scientific  study  of  the  human 
factors  in  industry  will  find  much  that  is  new  and  valuable  in  this  book. 

R.  W.  Stone 
Iowa  State  UNxvERSiry 


Lectures  on  Industrial  Psychology.  By  Bernard  Muscio.  New 
York:  Button,  1910.  Pp.  iv+300.  $3.00. 
The  author  defines  industrial  psychology  as  a  study  of  methods 
for  selecting  workers  on  the  basis  of  natural  fitness  and  for  obtaining 
from  any  expenditure  of  energy  a  maximum  product.  To  these  ends 
he  advocates  the  establishment  of  a  vocational  laboratory  in  connection 
with  every  educational  plant  or  system.     It  shall  be  the  duty  of  the 


374  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

advisory  committees  of  these  laboratories  to  give  information  (i)  about 
the  capacities  of  the  persons  who  are  being  examined,  (2)  about  the 
capacities  required  for  any  kind  of  labor  for  which  there  is  a  demand, 
and  (3)  about  probable  demands  for  various  forms  of  labor. 

Mr.  Muscio  discusses  the  main  objections  to  scientific  management 
such  as  (i)  mere  speeding  up,  (2)  the  increase  of  production  about 
300  per  cent,  and  of  wages  only  30  to  100  per  cent,  (3)  the  interference 
with  collective  bargaining,  (4)  the  destruction  of  craft  skill,  and  (5)  the 
undemocratic  result  of  throwing  undue  industrial  power  into  the  hands 
of  "the  management."  The  author  advocates  the  creation  of  com- 
mittees of  workers  who  shall  co-operate  with  the  "management"  in 
putting  the  principles  of  scientific  management  into  practice. 

The  tone  of  the  book  is  fair-minded,  scientific,  and  constructive. 
Although  sympathetic  with  the  workers,  the  author  does  not  point  out 
the  function  which  industrial  psychology  may  perform  in  showing  how 
the  personalities  of  the  workers  may  be  developed  through  their  occu- 
pational activities  and  interests. 

E.  S.  BOGARDUS 

UmvERSiTY  OF  Southern  Califoknia 


Socialism  in  Thought  and  Action.  By  Harry  W.  Laidler.  The 
Macmillan  Company.     Pp.  xviii+546.     $2.50. 

This  is  an  exposition  of  socialism  by  the  secretary  of  the  Inter- 
collegiate Society.  The  author  does  not  try  so  much  to  express  his 
own  views  but  to  give  those  of  the  acknowledged  spokesmen  of  that 
party;  these  are  expressed  in  a  brief,  clear,  and  direct  manner.  The 
book  begins  with  a  criticism  of  the  wastefulness  and  inefficiency  of  the 
present  system  as  the  result  of  competition  in  production  and  dis- 
tribution, resulting  in  waste  of  human  life  and  energy  through  unemploy- 
ment, industrial  accident,  and  illness.  The  indictments  against  the 
unequal  distribution  of  wealth,  the  wage  system,  and  social  maladjust- 
ment are  ably  stated  and  backed  up  by  strong  proof. 

Chapter  iii  begins  the  statement  of  the  socialist  theory.  This 
follows  the  Marxian  theories  of  economic  interpretation  of  history, 
class  struggle,  surplus  value,  and  the  labor  theory  of  value,  although 
modem  limitations  and  interpretations  are  placed  upon  all  of  these. 
He  defines  the  labor  theory  of  value  as  "  the  amount  of  socially  necessary 
labor  contained  therein,  that  is  the  amount  of  average  human  labor 
which  is  necessary  for  society  to  expend  upon  its  reproduction,  not  the 


REVIEWS  375 

labor  which  might  accidentally  be  embodied  in  a  particular  commodity  as 
a  result  of  some  pecularity  under  which  the  laborer  worked  (p.  117). 
By  disappearance  of  the  middle  class,  he  explains,  is  meant  especially 
the  middle-class  employer,  and  the  increasing  misery  as  not  so  much 
physical  degeneration  as  the  worker's  recognition  of  injustice  and  his 
decreasing  share  in  society's  product. 

The  aims  of  socialism  are  defined  as  the  "collective  ownership  and 
democratic  management  of  the  socially  necessary  means  of  production 
and  distribution";  that  socialism  does  not  advocate  the  return  to  a 
handicraft  stage;  that  private  enterprise  should  continue  where  there 
is  not  exploitation  and  that  voluntary  co-operation  would  be  encour- 
aged, that  the  state  would  be  controlled  by  the  masses  and  not  by  a 
few  individuals;  that  socialism  does  not  intend  to  interfere  with 
religion  or  the  family. 

Syndicalism  is  recognized  as  the  left  wing  of  the  socialist  movement 
and  is  frankly  treated  with  its  theory  of  general  strikes  and  sabotage 
as  striking  at  the  socialist  conception  of  democracy. 

Under  tendencies  toward  socialism  are  included  the  modern  cor- 
poration, social  reforms,  co-operation,  public  ownership,  advances  in 
education  and  general  health,  the  growth  of  the  labor  union,  and  the 
improvement  of  working  conditions.  The  author  argues  rather  skilfully 
against  such  objections  to  socialism  as  the  absence  of  incentive,  the 
probable  inadequate  accumulation  of  wealth,  and  pohtical  corruption. 

Part  II  takes  up  the  development  of  the  sociaUst  movement 
beginning  with  the  organization  of  the  different  internationals  and 
extending  down  to  the  present  day.  Here  emphasis  is  placed  upon 
the  development  and  changes  during  and  after  the  world-war,  especially 
in  Russia  and  the  Central  Empires,  although  its  progress  is  traced  in 
all  nations.  This  part  of  the  book  contains  much  detail  and  is  not 
nearly  as  interesting  or  as  well  written  as  Part  I,  possibly  due  to 
the  uncertain  material  to  be  dealt  with. 

Throughout  the  entire  work  differences  of  opinion  are  given;  argu- 
ments are  sound  and  the  proof  offered  scientific.  In  fact  it  is  a  splendid 
presentation  of  this  movement.  An  adequate  bibliography  of  the  best 
books  on  socialism  with  their  pubUshers  and  comments  is  added.  Not 
only  does  the  book  deserve  serious  attention  but  it  would  make  an 

excellent  text. 

G.  S.  Dow 

Baylor  University 


376  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

Man  or  the  State?    By  Waldo  R.  Browne,  compiler  and  editor. 
New  York:  Huebsch,  1919.     Pp.  xii+141.     $1.00. 

Mr.  Browne  has  brought  together  selected  readings  from  Kropotkin, 
Buckle,  Emerson,  Thoreau,  Spenser,  Tolstoy,  and  Oscar  Wilde,  which 
support  the  thesis  that  state  control  is  a  failure  and  that  social  salvation 
lies  in  the  deification  of  "personal  liberty,"  which  will  culminate  in 
"a  really  free  society." 

I  believe  that  the  compiler  misses  the  main  problem  in  his  field 
today  which  is  not  "Man  or  the  State?"  but  "Man,"  "the  State," 
or  "Man  and  the  State."  The  current  problem  is  to  find  out  how  the 
individual  and  government  can  work  together  to  the  best  advantage 
of  all. 

E.  S.  BOGARDUS 

University  of  Southern  California 


Religion  and  the  New  Psychology.  By  Walter  Samuel  Swisher, 
B.D.  Boston:  Marshall  Jones  Co.,  1920.  Pp.  xv+259. 
$2.00. 

The  value  of  psychoanalysis  for  the  religious  worker  was  demon- 
strated some  years  ago  when  Pfister  brought  forth  his  "Psychoanalytic 
Method."  Pfister 's  book  dtew  attention  to  the  need  of  reHgion  itself 
receiving  psychoanalytic  interpretation.  Such  a  study  of  religion  is 
attempted  by  Religion  and  the  New  Psychology.  From  a  viewpoint 
almost  exclusively  Freudian  the  book  treats  such  topics  as  the  nature 
of  the  unconscious  and  its  influence  on  the  religious  life,  determinism 
and  freewill,  mysticism  and  neurotic  states,  the  problem  of  evil,  patho- 
logical religious  types,  conversion,  and  attendant  phenomena. 

Jesus,  except  for  certain  masochistic  tendencies,  is  declared  free 
from  neurosis  (p.  34).  Paul,  who  had  the  determining  influence  in  the 
early  church,  was  first  strongly  sadistic,  then  masochistic,  and  to  the 
end  neurotic  (pp.  35-37).  Conversion  represents  a  mind-state  "always 
and  everywhere  indicative  of  a  neurosis"  (p.  147).  The  most  useful 
part  of  the  book  deals  with  religious  education  and  illustrates  the  baneful 
effects  of  early  religious  fears.  The  author  is  dogmatic  in  his  state- 
ments regarding  the  religious  and  non-ethical  life  of  primitive  people. 
Most  of  the  readers,  famiUar  with  psychoanalytic  Uterature,  will  turn 
from  the  book  with  the  conviction  that  a  satisfactory  discussion  of 
religion  and  the  new  psychology  is  hardly  to  be  expected  from  within 
the  ministerial  profession. 


REVIEWS  377 

The  book  would  serve  a  useful  purpose  were  it  not  unlikely  to  be 
read  by  those  who  need  it  most. 

Ernest  R.  Groves 
Boston  University 

Six  Thousand  Country  Churches.  By  Charles  Otis  Gill  and 
GiFFORD  PiNCHOT.  New  York:  Macmillan  Co.,  1919.  Pp. 
xiv+237.     $2.00. 

It  would  seem  from  this  survey  that  Ohio  in  its  1,170  rural  townships 
is  suffering  from  a  plethora  of  churches  and  a  dearth  of  religion,  and 
that  this  is  lamentably  true  in  the  eighteen  counties  composing  the 
southeast  section  of  the  state.  Where  social  decline  and  degeneracy 
are  most  marked,  it  is  the  native  born  of  native  parentage  that  are 
involved  and  where  denominational  competition  has  brought  Chris- 
tianity to  a  standstill,  orgiastic  or  emotional  substitutes,  like  Holy 
Rollerism,  thrive.  The  statistical  tables,  maps,  and  faithful  treatment 
of  detail  set  a  high  standard  for  church  surveys  and  represent  the  pro- 
jection on  a  larger  scale  of  the  methods  employed  by  the  authors  in 
their  former  book,  The  County  Church. 

From  the  few  examples  given  of  federated  or  community  church 
experiments  one  may  hope  that  the  problem  is  not  insolv^able;  while 
perhaps  the  chief  value  of  the  work,  which  was  sponsored  by  the  Federal 
Council  of  the  Churches  of  Christ  in  America  through  its  Commission 
on  Church  and  Country  Life,  lies  in  its  impartial  exhibit  of  the  zeal 
and  stupidity  of  denominationalism  gone  to  seed. 

Allan  Hoben 

Carleton  College 

Educatian  through  Settlements.  By  Arnold  Freeman.  London: 
Allen  &  Unwin,  Ltd.,  1919.     Pp.  63. 

Education  through  Settlements  is  a  pamphlet  of  sixty-three  pages 
defining  education  and  reUgion,  not  in  the  conventional  language  of 
the  pedagogue  or  the  preacher. 

In  the  Preface  by  Arnold  S.  Rowmtree  we  are  introduced  to  the 
"  Settlement  Movement "  described  in  these  pages  as  "  peculiarly  adapted 
to  present  day  needs."  "  It  provides,"  he  states,  "  a  method  of  approach 
towards  the  solving  of  our  many  problems  along  the  hnes  of  local  effort, 
and  seems  destined  to  play  a  useful  part  during  the  next  few  decades 
in  the  'intellectual  and  social  emancipation  of  the  people.'  " 

"The  virtue  of  this  Httle  book,"  Mr.  Rowntree  says,  "is  that, 
while  informed  from  actual  experience,  it  is  alight  with  a  healthy  and 


378  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

refreshing  imagination."  "  It  is  hoped,"  he  adds,  "  that  what  is  written 
here  may  not  be  without  its  influence  upon  the  future  poUcy,  both  of 
the  universities  and  our  churches." 

The  central  idea,  Mr.  Freeman  tells  us,  is  expressed  in  the  phrase 
"education  through  fellowship  for  service."  In  fancy  he  brings  back 
to  communities  in  England  the  spirits  of  those  civilized  men  and 
women  who,  if  reincarnated,  would,  after  seeing  the  conditions  as  they 
are  after  the  war,  write  a  manifesto  expressing  the  faith  of  those  who 
long  to  throw  off  their  chains  and  be  spiritually  free  to  serve  the  com- 
munity in  which  they  live. 

Their  idea  of  a  "settlement"  is  a  place  where  not  the  poor  but 
everybody  is  to  be  educated.  Rich  and  poor,  elementary  school,  and 
college  graduates  are  to  enter  this  "new  university  which  will  set  itself 
to  estabhsh  the  Kingdom  of  God  by  distributing  culture  among  the 
mass  of  the  people." 

This  settlement  center  of  education  for  service  is  to  be  "more 
interested  in  religion  than  the  university,  more  interested  in  culture 
than  the  church." 

It  is  stimulating  to  have  a  call  to  such  practical,  yet  such  idealistic 
service  as  Mr.  Freeman  sends  to  us  from  England.  He  beUeves  that 
in  every  community  there  is  a  group  of  men  and  women  who  will  ignore 
their  religious,  poUtical,  social,  and  educational  differences  if  they  can 
see  "beyond  the  soHd  blackness  of  the  present  into  the  golden  splendors 
of  the  world  that  is  even  now  in  the  making."  To  educate  for  this 
propaganda  of  fellowship  for  service  he  would  have  settlements  estab- 
lished wherever  two  or  three  can  come  together  in  this  faith.  It  may 
be  a  cottage — a  single  room  that  may  grow  and  develop  "  about  a  person 
with  imagination.  Even  if  he  begins  without  a  penny  in  his  pocket 
or  a  friend  in  the  locality,  he  will  make  an  outstanding  settlement." 

In  Part  III  Mr.  Freeman  gives  methods  of  sociaUzing  "spiritual 
treasures."  The  settlement  stands  for  an  education  for  all  citizens 
that  makes  "education  used  for  selfish  benefits  a  torture  to  the  man 
himself."  "It  must  stand  for  an  education  which  turns  out  not  book- 
worms, dilettantes,  theorists,  talkers,  but  men  and  women  who  are 
capable  workers,  responsible  heads  of  households  and  who  are  citizens 
who  love  their  city  too  much  to  be  satisfied  with  it.^' 

To  further  these  ideals  of  education  through  fellowship  for  service 
the  members  of  this  center  or  "settlement"  must  be  missionaries  of 
a  new  kind — they  must  be  prepared  to  propagandize,  "to  impress  their 
ideals,  to  inform  the  minds  and  stimulate  the  wills  and  fire  the  con- 


REVIEWS  379 

sciences  of  as  many  people  as  they  can  reach.  They  need  not  talk 
about  the  settlement,  but  in  their  own  persons  they  must  be  the  settle- 
ment." 

It  is  his  idea  that  the  "settlement"  is  to  be  the  "aggregating  centei* 
for  the  spiritual  and  social  forces  of  construction."  As  one  reads  these 
pages  so  full  of  spiritual  inspiration  one  reaUzes  that  only  those  who 
went  through  the  awful  war  and  kept  the  faith  could  have  written 
these  words  of  idealism  that  the  writer  believes  may  become  a  reality. 

It  strengthens  one's  own  faith  to  have  quotations  from  such  as 
Arthur  Henderson,  R.  H.  Tawney,  and  our  own  Jane  Addams.  Arthur 
Henderson,  the  labor  leader,  speaking  of  these  settlements  where  all 
who  want  to  serve  in  fellowship  meet  together,  says  "  We  have  to  extend 
the  range  of  their  power,  and  to  develop  their  activities  as  a  means  of 
promoting  the  unity  of  classes,  and  of  spreading  a  new  conception  of 
brotherhood  amongst  all  sections  of  the  community." 

Mr.  Freeman  appeals  to  men  and  women  who  are  not  afraid  of 
ideals,  and  not  bound  by  conventionalism.  The  war  and  its  effect  on 
the  community  has  brought  him  face  to  face  with  reality;  he  says 
"I  do  not  know  if  there  will  be  a  revolution,  but  I  do  know  that  it 
could  be  avoided." 

Social  workers,  church  workers,  university  men  and  women  of 
imagination  in  America  will  find  here  a  message  if  they  want  it. 

Mary  E.  McDowell 

University  of  Chicago  Settlement 


New  Schools  for  Old.     By  Evelyn  Dewey.     E.  P.  Button  &  Co., 
1919.     Pp.  xi+337.     $2.00. 

"Sentimental  attachment  to  the  'Little  Red  Schoolhouse'  of  yester- 
day does  not  justify  the  maintenance  of  an  anachronism  today.  Mrs. 
Harvey,  by  her  work  in  Porter  Township,  has  proved  that  the  plant 
and  equipment  surviving  from  a  formerly  prized  institution  may  be 
so  utilized  even  in  our  communities  as  at  present  organized  that  the 
school  may  again  touch  every  interest  of  old  and  young." 

With  this  statement  Miss  Dewey  closes  her  discussion  of  the  Porter 
School,  located  near  Kirksville,  Missouri.  It  is  an  account  of  the 
work  done  by  Mrs.  Marie  Turner  Harvey  in  the  regeneration  of  an 
out-at-the-heels,  one-room  rural  school.  It  is  more  than  a  mere 
description,  however,  being  in  reality  a  study  of  the  country-life  problem 
in  the  concrete  and  an  interpretation  of  the  regenerative  power  of  a 
socialized  rural  school. 


380  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

There  can  be  little  doubt  that  the  one-room  rural  school  must  be 
made  over  or  abandoned.  Mrs.  Harvey  set  out  to  demonstrate  that 
it  can  be  made  into  a  vital  force  in  the  building  up  from  within  of  an 
ordinary  rural  community,  economically,  socially,  and  educationally, 
within  the  present  generation.  She  has  so  far  succeeded  that  Porter 
School  has  served  not  only  as  a  sort  of  national  rural-school  experiment 
station  but  as  a  model  for  thousands  of  rural  teachers.  While  it  would 
be  foolish  to  expect  the  poorly  trained  young  girls  in  charge  of  most 
of  our  rural  schools  to  do  what  a  zealous  and  talented  woman  has  done, 
yet  Mrs.  Harvey,  in  her  seven  years'  work,  has  done  much  to  stimulate 
general  interest  in  a  vital  problem  and  to  restore  the  faith  of  the  expert. 

Miss  Dewey  has  shown  genuine  insight  into  rural  problems  and  has 
given  a  valuable  interpretation  of  the  school  approach  to  their  solution. 
Her  treatment  is  lacking  in  concreteness  and  seems  unnecessarily  long 
drawn  out  but  it  is  penetrating  and  sound.  Anyone  interested  in 
country-Hfe  problems  or  in  the  rural  school  would  do  well  to  read  it. 

Walter  R.  Smith 

University  of  Kansas 


American  Marriage  Laws.    By  Fred  S.  Hall  and  Elizabeth  W. 

Brooke.     New  York:    The  Russell  Sage  Foundation.  191 9. 

Pp.  132.  $1.00. 
Those  who  are  interested  in  the  too-much-neglected  topic  of 
marriage  legislation  will  appreciate  the  convenience  of  this  simplified 
and  comparative  arrangement  of  our  American  statutes  on  the  subject. 
Part  I  gives  proposals  for  marriage-law  reform,  using  as  its  chief  author- 
ities the  Commissioners  on  Uniform  State  Laws,  George  Elliott  Howard, 
Willystine  Goodsell,  and  Frank  Gaylord  Cook.  Part  II  summarizes 
existing  laws  by  topics,  making  a  comprehensive  comparison  of  the 
legislation  of  all  the  states  on  the  fundamental  points  involved. 
Part  III  gives  a  digest,  arranged  by  states,  of  the  marriage  laws  in  each 
state  of  the  Union.  In  a  most  striking  way  are  brought  out  the  numer- 
ous weaknesses  in  the  diverse  regulations  of  the  various  states,  which 
probably  constitute  the  most  defective  system  of  any  great  modern 
nation.  More  important  to  social  welfare  than  the  laws  themselves  is 
the  question  of  their  administration,  a  subject  to  be  treated  in  a  later 
volume  to  be  published  by  the  Russell  Sage  Foundation,  to  which  this 
volume  is  preliminary. 

Earle  E.  Eubank 
Y.  M.  C.  A,  College,  Chicago 


RECENT  LITERATURE 


NOTES  AND   ABSTRACTS 

The  Sociological  Method  of  Durkheim. — Emile  Durkheim  proposed  to  make  of 
sociology  a  far  more  strictly  empirical  science  than  it  had  ever  before  been  conceived. 
Yet  he  is  as  rationalistic  in  sociology  as  Descartes  was  in  physics  and  physiology.  He 
approaches  his  subject  with  a  scheme  readymade  for  carrying  on  the  investigation  of 
facts,  and  a  framework  into  which  the  results  of  his  investigation  shall  fall.  The 
method  is  proposed  as  one  that  has  grown  out  of  the  personal  experience  of  the  writer, 
and  Durkheim  expressly  declares  that  with  the  growth  of  his  own  and  other  peoples' 
further  experience  the  method  doubtless  will  be  revised.  But  as  feature  after  feature 
of  the  method  is  expounded  he  declares  for  it  that  it  is  absolutely  indispensable — that 
on  no  other  basis  is  a  science  of  sociology  possible.  Therefore  the  main  outlines  are 
fairly  to  be  regarded  as  permanent.  The  rules  that  constitute  Durkheim's  method 
are  of  two  kinds:  those  belonging  to  empirical  sciences  generally,  and  those  peculiar 
to  sociology.  Among  the  rules  of  the  first  kind  stands  the  demand  that  the  objects 
of  the  science  shall  be  studied  directly  as  facts.  Even  if  the  objects  in  question  are 
ideas,  they  must  be  approached  in  the  same  direct  fashion.  However  useful  science 
may  be  in  its  applications,  it  is  essentially  and  fundamentally  theoretical.  Its  ques- 
tion is  not  What  ought  to  be?  but  What  is?  The  former  question  belongs  to  science 
only  when  and  in  so  far  as  it  has  been  transformed  into  the  latter.  But  abstractions 
must  not  be  substituted  for  facts.  Durkheim  declares  that  no  psychological  explana- 
tion of  any  phenomenon  is  ever  sufficient.  It  is  what  he  calls  the  interned  social 
emironment  that  counts.  Durkheim's  Naews  on  the  relation  of  psychology  will  seem 
paradoxical  or  even  plainly  false  to  many  who  sympathize  with  his  general  positivistic 
position,  but  the  author  is  inclined  to  think  that  the  author  is  here  essentially  right. 
His  use  of  the  analogy  between  society  and  the  organism  and  his  definition  of  the 
normal  and  the  pathological  is  open  to  criticism.  Despite  his  announced  purpose, 
Durkheim's  alternative  to  ideology  amoimts  to  a  new  ideology. — Theodore  de  Laguna, 
Philosophic  Review,  May,  1920.  O.  B.Y. 

The  Basis  of  Human  Association. — A  society  is  not  formed  whenever  a  number 
of  human  individuals  under  the  promptings  of  the  same  impulse  engage  together  in 
the  same  pursuit.  The  division  of  labor  with  exchange  of  products  does  not  con- 
stitute genuine  association.  Nor  do  the  reciprocal  activities  originating  in  the  sex 
and  gregarious  instincts  of  themselves  constitute  a  true  society.  The  semblance  of 
social  and  political  authority  may  even  be  exercised  and  obeyed  without  really  asso- 
ciating the  individuals  involved.  The  basis  of  community  is  communication.  Per- 
sonal communication  in  the  concrete  means  discussion,  co-operation,  and  concordant 
emotion.  In  discussion  the  medium  of  transmission  is  language.  The  essential  con- 
dition of  co-operation  is  to  be  found  in  the  ability  of  the  human  individual  to  realize 
purposes  common  to  the  choice  of  himself  and  others  through  the  instrumentality 
of  bodily  movements  freely  controlled  and  initiated.  Emotional  concord  becomes  a 
form  of  personal  conmiunication  when  it  springs  from  a  source  that  is  mutually 
understood  by  the  participants.  It  is  more  than  sympathy  or  the  instinctive  reaction 
to  the  visible  signs  of  another's  pleasure  and  pain.  Perhaps  the  first  and  fundamental 
instance  of  emotional  concord  as  true  association  is  furnished  by  friendship  or  love. — 
Henry  W.  Wright,  Journal  of  Philosophy,  Psychology,  and  Scientific  Methods,  July  29, 


192a 


O.  B.Y. 


The  Modification  of  Instinct  from  the  Standpoint  of  Social  Psychology. — Social 
Psychology  is  as  interested  in  the  experimental  facts  concerning  instincts  as  is  normal 
human  adult  psychology,  but  it  seeks  more  insistently  to  put  the  data  together  in  a 

381 


382  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

manner  significant  to  the  understanding  of  human  nature  so  far  as  this  is  modified  by 
its  social  environs.  The  social  significance  of  instincts  cannot  be  brought  out  by 
analysis  of  the  nature  of  specific  forms  of  response,  but  must  come  largely  from  a 
consideration  of  the  types  of  modification  that  instinctive  forms  of  behavior  undergo. 
These  variations  come  fundamentally  from  the  influence  of  habit  and  other  forms  of 
intelligent  behavior.  The  topic  is  further  elaborated  with  reference  to  the  following 
points:  (i)  modification  of  the  structural  elements,  including  (c)  changes  in  the 
stimulus  in  its  internal  and  external  aspect,  {b)  changes  of  the  somatic  or  of  the  vis- 
ceral response,  and  (c)  combinations  of  these  in  sublimated  behavior;  (2)  the 
temporal  position  of  the  modification  as  it  occurs  before  or  after  the  initial  appearance 
of  the  instinct;  and  (3)  modification  of  the  biological  purpose  or  adaptive  value  of 
the  response. — Walter  S.  Hunter,  Psychological  Review,  July,  1920.  O.  B.Y. 

Motives  in  the  Light  of  Recent  Discussion. — There  are  still  psychologists  who 
believe  that  pleasure  and  pain,  either  experienced  or  anticipated,  are  the  moving 
powers  of  all  human  activity.  There  are  others  who  adhere  to  the  ideo-motor  theory 
of  the  intellectualists.  Others  again  seem  to  feel  no  need  for  any  theory  of  action 
and  are  content  to  regard  all  human  activity  as  merely  chains  of  complicated  mechani- 
cal reflexes.  This  discussion  starts  from  the  assumption  that  the  innate  constitution 
of  the  human  species  comprises  an  array  of  conative  dispositions.  These  may  be 
called  instincts  or  (with  Mr.  Shand)  emotional  dispositions,  or  merely  conative  tend- 
encies. In  Social  Psychology  the  author  has  argued  that  these  native  tendencies 
are  the  mainspring  of  all  man's  activity.  Several  psychologists  have  accepted  the 
author's  account  of  these  native  tendencies  as  in  the  main  correct,  but  some  propose 
to  supplement  them  by  recognizing  other  springs  of  thought  and  action  of  a  different 
nature.  Professor  Woodworth  has  raised  the  question  in  the  most  defijiite  form  in 
his  Dynamic  Psychology.  He  agrees  that  the  instincts  furnish  motives  of  much 
human  activity  but  he  maintains  that  there  are  other  motive  forces  in  the  mind.  In 
the  organism  or  the  mind  we  may  distinguish  structure  from  the  activating  forces; 
and  he  speaks  of  the  former  as  "mechanism"  and  the  latter  as  "drives."  He  main- 
tains that  all  "mechanisms,"  whether  innate  or  acquired,  contain  their  own  driv- 
ing power  and  are  not  wholly  dependent  upon  "drive"  coming  from  the  instincts. 
McDougall  holds  that  the  motor  habit  contains  no  intrinsic  drive.  It  determines 
how  we  shall  execute  our  purposes,  but  does  not  prompt  and  sustain  the  doing.  The 
motor  habit  is  originally  acquired  in  the  ser\'^ice  of  some  extrinsic  purpose  or  motive 
and  then  operates  only  as  a  part  of  some  larger  complex  activity,  i.e.,  it  has  become 
a  channel  through  which  some  impulse  finds  a  ready  outlet. — W.  McDougall,  Mind, 
July,  1920.  O.  B.Y. 

Neo-Realism  and  the  Origin  of  Consciousness. — The  close  association  between 
conscious  life  and  neural  organization  supports  the  conclusion  that  consciousness 
originated  as  a  method  of  biological  adjustment.  Just  as  the  principle  of  the  con- 
servation of  energy  is  a  regulative  principle  in  physics,  so  the  theory  that  conscious- 
ness is  a  product  of  evolution  may  be  regarded  as  an  important  regulative  principle 
in  the  study  of  the  nature  of  consciousness.  The  new  realist  believes  that  sense- 
perception  discloses  to  the  percipient  objects  as  they  really  are;  representationalism 
believes  that  all  qualities  apprehended  by  sense  are  mental  versions  or  symbols  of 
the  realities  perceived.  Perception  may  be  incomplete,  but  for  new  realism  it  faith- 
fully presents  reality.  A  desire  to  guarantee  a  possibility  of  absolute  knowledge  at 
its  source  is  the  underlying  motive  of  neo-realism.  If  consciousness  originally  adapted 
the  actions  of  organisms  to  their  environment,  it  only  secondarily  adapted  them  to 
apprehension  of  reality.  Neo-realism  must  face  the  prospect  of  being  compelled  to 
maintain  that  from  the  first  it  was  obligatory  on  consciousness  to  perceive  things  as 
they  really  are,  however  incomplete  this  perception.  The  origin  of  perception  as  a 
mode  of  adjustment  between  organism  and  environment  is  assumed  by  many  to  con- 
firm neo-realistic  estimates  of  its  direct  apprehending  power.  But  if  conscious 
experiences  are  habitually  used  as  cues  to  action  or  as  inducement  to  it,  it  is  quite 
possible  that  the  most  original  sensation  may  simply  intimate,  induce,  or  prompt 
movements  that  adjust  the  organism  to  its  surroundings  without  conveying  to  it  the 


RECENT  LITERATURE  383 

impress  of  reality.  The  representationalistic  view  is  that  "things-in-themselves"  are 
represented  in  consciousness  as  mental  versions  or  symbolisms.  Every  conscious 
experience  may  mean,  in  the  final  issue,  simply  pleasure  or  pain. — Joshua  C.  Gregory, 
Philosophicair  Review,  May,  1920.  O.  B.Y. 

Some  General  Aspects  of  Family  Desertion. — The  family  is  the  oldest  of  our 
social  institutions,  and  yet  the  scientific  study  of  the  family  has  until  recent  years 
been  sadly  neglected.  The  chaotic  condition  of  our  divorce  laws  has  done  much  to 
undermine  and  disrupt  our  homes.  The  reports  of  social  agencies  indicate  that 
12.5  per  cent  of  dependency  is  due  to  desertion.  The  census  statistics  indicate  that 
the  wife  deserts  more  frequently  than  the  husband.  In  1916,  23,082  out  of  a  total 
of  74,893  divorces  granted  to  wives,  or  36.8  per  cent,  were  for  desertion,  while  16.908 
out  of  a  total  of  33,  809  divorces  granted  to  husbands,  or  50  per  cent,  were  caused  by 
desertion.  This  is  only  the  assigned  reason.  More  reliable  statistics  refute  the  fore- 
going figures.  The  causes  of  desertion  are  sexual,  economic,  psychological,  psycho- 
pathic, and  hygienic.  The  treatment  for  the  determining  causes  of  desertion  are: 
(i)  a  federal  marriage  and  divorce  statute  with  concurrent  uniform  legislation  by 
the  states;  (2)  the  prevention  of  hasty  and  ill-considered  marriages;  (3)  proper 
ethical  and  hygienic  instruction,  both  in  school  and  home,  as  to  marital  and  parental 
duties;  (4)  the  establishment  of  municipal  desertion  bureaus,  in  charge  of  desertion 
experts;  (5)  vigorous  enforcement  of  the  law  on  the  part  of  district  attorneys  and 
public  authorities;  (6)  the  creation  of  "family  courts"  with  full  jurisdiction  in  all 
family  matters  and  with  properly  organized  social  service  and  probation  depart- 
ments, working  in  conjunction  with  psychiatric  clinics. — ^Walter  H.  Liebman,  Social 
Hygiene,  April,  1920.  C.  N. 

The  Unadjusted  Girl. — The  child  of  twelve  to  fifteen  who  becomes  so  socially 
"unfit"  as  to  make  it  necessary  for  the  court  to  intervene  began  as  a  "misfit."  Heredity 
plays  an  important  r6le  in  the  development  of  the  child.  The  second  factor  in  mal- 
adjustment is  the  house  which  the  girl  is  expected  to  call  "home."  In  Texas  it  is  apt 
to  be  a  covered  wagon  or  "shotgun"  house,  i.e.,  three  rooms  in  a  row  opening  into 
one  another  with  no  hallway.  She  does  not  fit  into  such  a  house  because  it  plays 
havoc  with  modesty,  and  makes  privacy  and  individuality  an  impossibility.  The 
third  factor  that  has  a  direct  bearing  on  physical  degeneracy  and  consequent  delin- 
quency is  the  miserable  quality  of  food  that  is  the  sustenance  of  the  average  family 
representing  the  class  from  which  delinquents  are  recruited.  It  is  utterly  impossible 
to  produce  a  normal  physical  body  on  an  unbalanced  ration.  And  still  another 
factor  connected  with  the  delinquent  girl  is  the  inadequency  of  the  publip  school  for 
proper  education.  The  child  whose  school  life  is  supplemented  by  a  normal  home 
life  may  not  suffer;  but  the  unfortunate  whose  only  chance  of  culture  is  the  doubtful 
one  of  the  American  public  school  ceases  to  receive  the  useless  solicitude  of  orators 
on  "Americanization,"  and  becomes  instead  the  very  definite  responsibility  of  the 
local  tax-payers. — Carrie  Weaver  Smith,  Social  Hygiene,  July,  1920.  C.  N. 

Colonies  for  Mental  Defectives. — For  some  years  there  has  been  a  growing 
interest  in  the  plan  of  caring  for  mental  defectives  in  groups  apart  from  the  parent 
institution  for  economic  and  social  reasons.  There  are  three  tj^es  of  colonies:  (i)  the 
farm  colonies  which  are  situated  on  state  or  private  land,  either  rented  or  purchased. 
The  grade  of  labor  utilized  varies  from  that  of  imbecile  to  the  high-grade  moron. 
According  to  the  figures  given  out  by  Dr.  Berstein  the  farm  colonies  have  been  self- 
supporting  institutions  in  the  state  of  New  York.  (2)  The  industrial  colonies  where 
only  high-grade  cases  of  either  sex  live  under  supervision  and  work  in  a  factory, 
shop,  or  other  industry.  This  type  of  colony  is  best  illustrated  by  one  established 
at  Oriskany  Falls,  New  York,  by  Dr.  Berstein.  The  chief  claims  for  the  industrial 
colony  are:  (c)  it  provides  employment  for  the  class  of  border-line  defectives;  (6)  it 
meets  a  demand  for  labor  which  is  especially  emergent  at  this  time;  (c)  it  constitutes 
one  method  of  making  remuneration  to  the  state  for  public  wards.  (3)  The  domestic 
colony,  the  first  one  of  its  kind,  was  opened  in  the  city  of  Rome  in  1914.  The  inmates 
are  girls  who  go  out  by  the  day  or  week  for  domestic  service  in  private  homes.    Wages 


384  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

are  paid  through  a  collector  into  the  colony  fund.  Colonies  can  be  made  to  solve 
the  problem  of  removing  the  feeble-minded  prostitute  from  the  community  and 
defectives  can  be  made  law-abiding,  self-respecting,  and  self-suppK)rting  members  of 
society. — Ethel  Anderson  Prince. — Social  Hygiene,  July,  1920.  C.  N. 

MalnutritioD  and  Health  Education. — In  such  a  study  of  malnutrition  and 
health  education,  ignorance  both  on  the  part  of  the  parent  and  of  the  child  as  to 
desirable  conditions  under  which  food  should  be  taken  was  assumed  as  a  causal  factor. 
First-hand  experience  and  opportunities  for  self-expression  are  as  valuable  in  nutrition 
as  in  other  fields,  so  a  system  was  worked  out  which  embodied  these  features  in  the 
study.  Two  open-air  classes,  of  which  the  children  should  as  far  as  possible  be 
those  who  had  been  in  the  nutrition  classes  the  previous  year  and  who  were  still 
underweight,  were  selected  for  one  part  of  the  tests,  while  the  fifth-grade  pupils — 
226  children,  as  compared  with  48  in  the  other  group — were  chosen  for  the  other 
part.  In  some  instances  children  made  progress  when  they  failed  to  obey  the  instruc- 
tions given;  on  the  other  hand,  those  who  most  faithfully  lived  up  to  the  instructions 
failed  to  gain  weight.  Both  of  these  situations  created  difficult  problems  of  explana- 
tion to  the  children,  who  watched  their  charts  each  day.  It  was  found  that  the 
psychology  of  failure  was  quite  as  important  as  the  psychology  of  success.  We  must 
know  the  amount  of  food  not  only  necessary  to  maintain  life  but  also  to  supply  the 
energy  used  up  in  various  life-activities.  It  is  also  necessary  to  consider  the  attitude 
of  the  child  toward  food  and  the  emotional  characteristics  of  children  and  their  asso- 
ciates. People  have  thought  they  were  starving  because  the  type  of  food  was  changed, 
even  though  the  caloric  value  of  the  new  diet  was  superior  to  the  old.  Certain  emo- 
tional factors  such  as  rage  and  fear  have  a  marked  effect  upon  nutrition  processes. 
We  are  in  approximately  the  same  condition  in  respect  to  the  problem  of  the  mental 
development  of  undernourished  children  as  we  are  in  considering  the  causal  factors 
of  undernourishment.  A  frank  confession  of  ignorance  is  all  that  can  be  made.  We 
do  not  know  why  many  children  fail  to  gain  in  weight,  neither  do  we  know  that 
between  the  failure  to  gain  in  weight  and  school  progress  there  is  any  clear  connection. 
It  may  be  that  biological  variations  shown  in  decreased  weight  may  be  compensated 
for  by  greater  ability  and  adaptation,  i.e.,  by  greater  readiness  and  response  to  the 
stimuli  of  new  situations.  An  answer  to  these  questions  will  require  much  more 
extended  and  at  the  same  time  intensive  investigations.  We  may  not  cure  mal- 
nutrition by  education  but  we  can  develop  habits  and  methods  of  living  which  will 
have  a  decided  influence  for  good  with  our  next  generation. — David  Mitchell  and 
Harriet  Forbes,  Pedagogical  Seminary,  May,  1920.  W.  F.  B. 

A  Program  for  Organizing  and  Co-ordinating  Industrial  Clinics. — The  industrial 
world  faces  the  problem  of  how  to  offset  a  decreased  labor  supply  and  how  to  lower 
the  costs  of  production.  In  some  industries  where  plant  medical  and  surgical  depart- 
ments have  been  established,  the  workers  have  developed  a  strong  dislike  for  the 
physical  examination,  claiming  it  is  used  as  a  basis  for  discrimination  between  union 
and  non-union  men  on  the  one  hand  and  against  the  employment  of  the  handicapped 
on  the  other.  Irrespective  of  the  accuracy  of  the  contention,  the  suspicion  forces  the 
need  of  a  neutral  agency  such  as  the  industrial  clinic.  The  present  determination  of 
occupational  poi.sons  is  absolutely  unreliable  and  we  must  have  accurate  information 
before  legislation  dealing  with  the  matter  is  enacted.  The  industrial  clinic  should  be 
able  to  collect  a  vast  mass  of  information  which,  when  analyzed,  would  uncover 
occupational  diseases  and  hazards  as  well  as  the  diagnostic  character  and  therapeutic 
and  prophylactic  technique  pertaining  thereto.  They  would  also  permit  of  engineer- 
ing research  to  eliminate  or  reduce  to  a  minimum  the  hazards  discovered.  The  most 
thoroughly  organized  and  equipped  clinic  with  the  most  comprehensive  program  is 
located  in  Milan,  Italy,  while  less  elaborate  but  unique  is  the  clinic  of  the  Joint  Board 
of  Sanitary  Control,  New  York  City,  organized  in  1910  for  the  benefit  of  the  Garment 
Workers'  Union.  However,  there  has  been  no  concerted  or  general  movement  to 
open  clinics  in  industrial  centers  throughout  the  country.  Discretion  must  be  shown 
in  its  organization  and  management.  It  must  be  a  neutral  ground  where  dominance 
is  neither  with  the  employer  nor  the  employee.     Both  will  have  to  pull  together  with 


RECENT  LITERATURE  385 

the  records  of  the  physical  examination  treated  confidentially,  except  in  special  cases. 
The  community  should  benefit  through  the  preservation  of  the  health  of  its  citizens; 
industry  should  benefit  through  increased  regularity  and  efl&ciency,  while  the  wage- 
earners  should  benefit  through  the  knowledge  furnished  them  about  their  health  and 
the  advice  given  as  to  proper  treatment  of  the  ailments  discovered.  Of  great  impor- 
tance to  the  nation  will  be  a  system  of  well  co-ordinated  industrial  clinics,  for  they 
will  be  invaluable  in  the  discovery  of  hazardous  processes  and  methods  to  be  adopted 
in  dealing  with  them. — Bernard  J.  Newman,  American  Journal  of  Public  Health, 
August,  1920.  W.  F.  B. 

Community  Medicine  and  Public  Health. — Something  is  known  concerning  the 
extent  of  sickness  in  this  country  as  a  result  of  surveys  made  by  the  Metropolitan 
Life  Insurance  Company  and  the  New  York  City  Department  of  Health,  the  "Report 
on  Disability  according  to  Age  and  Occupation"  by  Dr.  Boris  Emmett,  and  several 
other  studies  made  in  the  same  field  of  investigation.  Obtaining  in  their  censuses 
certain  "round  number  figures  which  must  of  course  be  taken  with  a  grain  of  salt," 
it  was  estimated  that  at  any  one  time  in  the  United  States  there  are  two  and  one-half 
million  sick  persons,  and  of  the  seriously  ill  at  least  one-fourth  are  without  doctor's 
aid.  Further,  a  considerable  portion  of  those  who  do  come  in  contact  with  a  doctor 
in  private  practice  or  through  a  hospital  receive  inadequate  care.  There  seem^  to 
be  no  dearth  of  doctors,  and  the  chief  reason  why  such  large  numbers  receive  nor 
attention  is  the  failure  of  the  public  to  appeal  for  medical  service.  The  solution  of 
the  problem  lies  in  the  reorganization  of  medicine.  Community  medicine  is  cheaper 
and  more  efiicient  than  is  medical  service  rendered  by  private  practitioners,  and  it 
wiU  stimulate  the  movement  for  health  insurance.  The  pay  clinic  would  meet  the 
need  of  the  great  middle  class  with  ability  to  pay  something  but  unable  or  unwilling 
under  existing  conditions  to  pay  for  medical  ser\ace  in  terms  ofifered  by  private  prac- 
ticing physicians.  Free  medical  supervision  at  the  University  of  Wisconsin  has 
brought  about  a  great  reduction  in  sickness  and  absenteeism  from  classes.  Com- 
munity medicine,  by  decreasing  sickness  and  death,  signally  increases  productive 
capacity,  actual  production,  and  total  net  savings.  It  will  be  of  exceptional  value 
to  the  local  health  administration  in  its  efforts  to  control  communicable  diseases.  It 
will  decrease  the  need  of  hospital  service,  reduce  the  amount  of  self-administration 
of  medical  service,  and  cut  down  the  enormous  consumption  of  patent  medicines. 
There  is,  of  course,  opposition  from  some  branches  of  the  medical  profession.  The 
spirit  of  individualism  is  in  conflict  with  the  spirit  of  co-operation,  but  the  world 
appears  to  be  moving  on  to  the  new  phase  of  co-operation  where  community  interests 
largely  take  the  place  of  individual  interests.  Thi^  change  would  seem  to  be  evolu- 
tionary and,  being  evolutionary,  quite  irresistible. — Ernst  Christopher  Meyer, 
American  Journal  Public  Health,  June,  1920.  W.  F.  B. 

Government  Housing  in  Canada. — The  Canadian  government  decided  to  inaugu- 
rate a  loan  of  $25,000,000  for  the  purpose  of  national  housing.  This  money  was  to 
be  distributed  among  the  mine  provinces,  pro  rata  to  the  population,  at  5  per  cent 
interest,  and  the  provinces  were  to  accept  the  responsibility  of  administration  of  the 
loan.  The  legitimacy  of  municipal  housing  has  been  established  in  Canada  through 
the  logic  of  an  urgent  human  need.  The  housing  act  has  been  in  operation  for  over 
a  year.  With  the  aid  of  the  federal  grant,  about  1,600  houses  have  been  built  and 
these  houses  are  expected  to  pay  for  their  construction.  The  province  of  Ontario 
has  raised  a  loan  of  $2,000,000  in  addition  \o  the  federal  loan  of  $8,753,291  and  has 
completed  1,184  houses.  New  housing  acts  have  been  adopted  by  the  provinces  of 
Ontario  and  of  Nova  Scotia.  In  the  province  of  New  Brunswick  fifty  houses  have 
been  built;  in  Quebec,  twenty  houses;  in  Manitoba,  over  seventy  houses,  and  about 
twice  that  number  are  in  course  of  construction;  in  British  Columbia  about  fifty 
houses  have  been  built  and  ninety  are  under  construction.  Through  the  application 
of  town-planning  principles  to  the  problem  of  housing,  the  home  can  be  made  attract- 
ive and  pleasant.  Town  planning  gives  to  the  humblest  resident  the  chance  of  out- 
door home  life,  and  this  is  a  part  of  the  Canadian  policy. — Alfred  Buckley,  National 
Municipal  Review,  August,  1920.  C.  N. 


386 


THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 


La  Societe  des  Nations  et  la  Religion  de  I'Humanite. — Universal  peace  can  be 
guaranteed  only  by  the  League  of  Nations,  and  the  League  of  Nations  can  only  be 
founded  on  justice.  But  true  justice  which  one  considers  as  a  privilege  to  recognize, 
as  an  obligation  to  fulfil,  is  already  something  infinitely  superior  to  general  interest 
and  to  the  sound  knowledge  of  the  advantages  which  will  accrue  to  all  through  uni- 
versal harmony.  It  is  the  recognition  of  the  rights  of  all,  as  a  respectable  and  sacred 
thing,  and  therefore  a  religious  object  in  itself,  as  well  as  moral  and  human.  Such  a 
notion  of  justice  implies  a  universal  brotherhood  of  man,  which  is  therefore  religious 
in  nature,  since  this  is  the  ideal  which  religion  strives  to  realize.  It  is,  therefore,  that 
we  do  not  hesitate  to  say  that  the  League  of  Nations  demands  a  religion  of  humanity, 
and  that  this  will  be  supplied  when  the  League  becomes  fully  conscious  of  its  unity, 
in  the  same  way  that  the  people,  united  under  the  Roman  Empire,  acquired  religious 
and  moral  consciousness  of  their  unity  in  Catholic  Christianity.  This  wiU  not  be  the 
work  of  a  day.  It  will  be  the  work  of  a  new  era  just  commencing  under  the  League 
of  Nations.  But  it  presupposes  among  aU  people  a  certain  capacity  for  putting  uni- 
versal and  spiritual  things  above  selfish,  material,  and  transitory  interests. — Alfred 
Loizy,  La  Paix  par  le  Droit,  March-April,  1920.  C.  V.  R. 

Psychology  and  the  War. — When  students  of  psychology  turned  their  attention 
to  the  mental  processes  which  underlie  social  activity  they  found  that  they  were 
helped  but  little  by  the  systems  of  the  academic  psychologists,  for  they  found  that 
reason  and  the  intellect  take  but  a  secondary  place  in  determining  the  behavior  of 
man  in  his  social  relations,  and  that  collective  conduct  is  determined  by  a  mass  of 
preferences  and  prejudices  which  can  only  be  explained  with  reference  to  instincts, 
desires,  and  conative  trends.  StiU  more  important  and  far  reaching  is  the  study  of 
man's  behavior  when  afflicted  by  disease.  The  psychoneuroses  can  be  brought  into 
an  orderly  and  intelligible  system  when  we  regard  them  to  be  due  to  the  loss  or  weaken- 
ing of  certain  mental  functions,  or  to  the  reawakening  of  other  functions  which  are 
normally  held  in  abeyance  as  the  result  of  suppression  and  control.  The  war  has 
shown  that  human  behavior  iji  the  mass  is  determined  by  sentiments  reacting  upon 
instinctive  trends  and  traditions  based  on  such  trends.  The  sexual  instinct  in  times 
of  peace  provides  the  most  potent  agent  in  the  mental  conflicts  upon  which  disorders 
of  the  mind  depend.  The  war  brought  into  action  the  instinct  of  self-preservation. 
The  danger  of  the  destruction  of  the  social  framework  in  each  person  acted  as  the 
stimulus  to  re-awaken  tendencies  connected  with  the  instinct  of  self-preservation. 
The  re-awakening  of  danger-instincts  produces  a  state  which  may  be  regarded  as  a 
universal  psychoneurosis,  which  explains  much  that  is  now  happening  in  human 
society.  The  social  disorder  is  taki^ig  various  forms  in  different  countries.  We 
hope  that  America  and  Great  Britain  are  suffering  from  nothing  worse  than  the 
fatigue  and  exhaustion.  There  are,  however,  some  national  symptoms  in  Great 
Britain  which  suggest  the  danger  of  a  more  definitely  morbid  state. — W.  H.  R.  Rivers, 
Scribner's,  August,  1920.  C.  N. 

America's  Troubled  Hour. — America  is  the  country  in  which  are  to  be  studied 
the  most  startling  revelations  of  what  is  called,  more  or  less  accurately,  the  mass 
mind.  It  is  also  the  country  in  which,  above  all  others,  external  uniformity  of  con- 
duct and  expression  is  not  only  imposed  and  enforced  but  is,  in  the  popular  view, 
harmonized  without  difficulty  with  the  cardinal  doctrine  of  the  Republic.  English 
people  should  realize  that  there  are  reasons  lying  deep  in  the  social  structure  and 
tradition  which  go  far  to  account  for  the  great  difference  that  exists  between  the 
British  and  American  attitude  toward  individual  heresy  and  a  dissentient  minority. 
No  country  has  ever  been  called  upon  to  grapple  with  so  huge  and  baffling  a  social 
problem  as  the  one  under  which  America  is  staggering  today.  Considered  in  the 
complex  terms  of  immigrant  communities,  of  capitalist  power,  of  labor  and  social 
organization,  of  city  life  and  the  cost  of  living,  of  the  Negro  and  the  swiftly  changing 
South,  of  a  stupendous  population  moving  irresistibly  toward  a  higher  material 
standard  than  has  ever  been  touched  by  any  people,  and  finally  of  a  great  nation 
puzzled  and  shocked  by  the  convulsions  of  the  Old  World,  we  have  the  most  over- 
powering prospect  ever  offered  to  the  mind  of  man. — S.  K.  Ratcliffe,  Contemporary 
Review,  June,  1920.  O.  B.  Y. 


RECENT  LITERATURE  387 

Die  Unzufriedenheit  als  Massenerscheinung  eine  sozial-psychologische  Studie. — 
The  history  of  man  shows  how  important  a  function  discontent  has  played  ifi  his 
evolution.  It  was  the  foundation  of  every  impulse  to  progress  and  cultural  advance. 
In  class  conflict,  too,  discontent  has  played  an  important  r61e;  the  class  consciousness 
of  the  proletariat  is  the  result  of  its  dissatisfaction  with  the  existing  order.  The 
laissez  faire  philosophy  of  capitalism  under  which  economic  inequality  increased, 
accompanied  by  the  despair  of  the  masses,  gave  rise  to  the  theory  that  the  diseased 
social  body  could  be  cured  by  nothing  less  stringent  than  a  revolution.  Graduallj', 
as  governments  began  to  exert  wholesome  influence  through  economic  and  social 
legislation,  there  came  the  realization  that  improvement  might  be  gained  by  reforms 
rather  than  by  revolution.  The  agitation  of  radicals  had  no  effect;  the  masses  real- 
ized that  they  had  made  gains,  and  that  these  gains  were  at  stake.  In  August,  i9i4> 
it  was  this  realization  which  determined  German  labor  to  stand  together  for  the 
defense  of  the  fatherland — not  war-psychosis.  During  the  course  of  the  war,  how- 
ever, this  attitude  gradually  changed.  While  profiteers  flourished,  the  economic 
struggle  of  the  lower  classes  grew  more  unfavorable.  Conditions  at  the  front  were 
similar.  Comparisons  between  the  conditions  under  which  the  common  soldier 
lived  with  those  of  the  officers  back  of  the  lines  gradually  produced  resentment  and 
rage.  Letters  from  home  which  told  how  the  profiteers  reveled  in  their  spoils  while 
the  families  of  the  common  soldiers  at  the  front  were  suffering  but  added  fuel  to  the 
flame.  Prussian  discipline  no  longer  sufficed  to  hold  in  check  the  wave  of  discontent; 
militarism  collapsed  of  itself,  at  the  front.  It  was  the  military  revolt  at  the  front  and 
in  the  garrisons,  uninfluenced  by  socialism  or  socialistic  demands,  which  resulted  in 
the  political  revolution  in  Germany.  A  social-democratic  republic  was  established. 
Unfortunately,  the  economic  freedom  of  the  masses  could  not  keep  pace  with  the 
political,  for  unconquerable  difficulties  had  to  be  met.  Dissension  among  the  pro- 
letariat itself  made  impossible  as  thoroughgoing  a  reform  as  was  desirable.  There 
was  the  agitation  of  the  radicals  to  overcome.  Even  the  desire  for  constructive 
measures  is  met  with  such  difficulties  as  the  low  monetary  value,  the  lack  of  raw 
materials,  the  inferiority  of  our  means  of  production  and  transportation  and  the 
scarcity  of  food.  Reactionaries  pointed  out  to  the  discontented  masses  that  they 
were  better  off  under  the  monarchy,  as  if  existing  conditions  were  due  to  the  revolu- 
tion alone,  instead  of  the  war.  The  masses  want  immediate  relief;  but  the  problem 
of  democratization  and  socialization  cannot  be  solved  so  rapidly.  The  power  of  the 
proletariat  to  make  reforms  under  present  conditions  is  over-estimated,  while  the 
resistance  power  of  capitalism  is  under-estimated.  The  increasing  discontent  of 
the  masses  is  utilized  by  the  enemies  of  social  democracy.  It  should  be  used  posi- 
tively, not  negatively;  its  actions  should  be  guided  by  insight  and  the  will  to  assist 
in  the  process  of  reconstruction. — Franz  Laufkotter,  Die  Neue  Zeit,  May  28  and 
June  4,  1920.  L-  M.  S. 

The  Formation  of  Public  Opinion  through  Motion  Pictures. — According  to  state- 
ments by  prominent  film  men,  in  1914  there  were  12,000  conamerical  motion  picture 
theaters  in  the  United  States.  A  recent  newspaper  estimate  places  the  number  at 
16,200;  but  12,000  to  15,000  is  probably  more  nearly  correct.  Some  have  reckoned 
that  one-third  to  one-half  the  population  of  the  United  States  enter  motion  picture 
theaters  weekly;  others  as  high  as  ten  million  each  day.  The  vast  majority  look  to 
the  screen  for  amusement,  but  the  number  who  are  instructed  is  constantly  growing. 
Professor  Ernest  W.  Burgess  of  the  University  of  Chicago  summarized  observations 
by  237  teachers  of  over  100,000  schoolchildren,  and  concluded  that  50  per  cent  of 
the  children  were  vitally  affected  by  the  motion  picture  and  that  in  relative  influence 
on  their  lives  the  home  stood  first,  the  school  second,  the  movies  third,  and  the  church 
fourth.  An  examination  of  the  list  of  840  feature  films  produced  between  September  i, 
1918,  and  September  i,  1919,  reveals  only  15,  or  1.7  per  cent,  suspected  of  specific 
propaganda  purpose.  Motion  pictures  may  serve  as  propaganda  by  showing  only 
the  things  wished  to  be  emphasized.  The  use  of  the  caption  also  furnishes  oppor- 
tunity for  "coloring"  news  films.  The  use  of  educational  films  by  governmental 
agencies  is  on  the  increase.  The  religious  film  is  stiU  in  its  infancy,  but  the  adoption 
of  the  motion  picture  by  religious  organizations  has  been  slow  but  apparently  sure. 
The  motion  picture  is  finding  a  use  in  industrial  and  commercial  life.     Big  business 


388  TEE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

interests  have  used  the  motion  picture  to  great  advantage  in  solving  internal  problems 
of  accident,  wastage,  and  holding  employees.  According  to  an  article  in  the  Edwch 
tional  Film  Magazine,  August,  1918,  some  34,821  men  saw  the  Safety  Film  at  the 
Ford  plant,  and  there  was  a  resulting  27  per  cent  decrease  in  the  number  of  lost-time 
accidents.  Films  produced  for  specific  propaganda  purpose,  not  commercial,  play 
an  important  part  in  the  formation  of  public  opinion.  This  was  shown  during  the 
war. — Harold  A.  Larrabee,  Religious  Education,  June,  1920.  R.  G.  H. 

Private  Rights  and  Civic  Beauty. — No  city  planning  can  get  anywhere  imless 
directed  to  the  constructive  character  of  the  buildings  of  which  the  city  is  made  up. 
Without  municipal  control  public-spirited  effort  merely  wastes  itself  against  a  massed 
ignorance  and  selfishness  falsely  dignified  with  the  name  of  rights.  The  American 
city  stands  impotent  before  "the  paramountcy  of  private  rights."  In  continental 
countries  cities  have  adopted  regulations  regarding  street  lines,  balconies,  height,  the 
style,  material,  and  other  matters  of  appearance  of  the  building.  In  America  city 
planners  confront  the  blank  wall  of  the  Constitution,  i.e.,  no  person  shall  be  deprived 
of  life,  liberty,  or  property  without  due  process  of  law,  and  that  private  property 
shall  not  be  taken  for  public  use  without  just  compensation.  The  courts  have  inter- 
preted these  provisions  in  favor  of  individual  cases.  No  survey  of  civic  aesthetics 
in  this  country  would  be  complete  without  taking  cognizance  of  the  individualistic 
and  decentralized  character  of  Anglo-Saxon  democracy.  The  antagonism  encountered 
in  this  field  will  already  have  shown  itself  to  involve  sociological  first  principles.  Back 
of  court  and  constitution  lies  the  Anglo-Saxon's  highly  developed  sense  of  freedom. 
So  jealous  is  our  love  of  liberty  that  we  have  made  individual  rights  the  comer  stone  of 
our  constitutional  structure.  E  pluribus  tmum  is  with  us  a  political  rather  than  a 
socia^l  maxim. — Stephen  Berrien  Stanton,  The  Unpartizan  Renew,  July-September, 
1920.  C. N. 

L'ldeal  Democratique  et  La  Chambre  Nouvelle. — The  word  "democracy"  still 
frightens  some  individuals,  and  to  them  a  democratic  regime  has  been  synonymous 
with  a  regime  where  the  ideal  was  that  of  a  dupe.  The  Great  War  has  largely  caused 
this  presumption  to  fall,  but  one  of  the  biggest  problems  to  face  any  democracy  is 
the  problem  of  competence,  that  is,  to  see  that  public  affairs  are  efficiently  managed 
and  at  the  same  time  in  a  democratic  manner.  The  means  by  which  the  democratic 
ideal  is  attained  is  summed  up  in  four  points.  First,  democracy  has  to  appeal  to 
the  co-operation  of  all  the  people.  The  first  appeal  is  made  to  the  simple  citizen 
whose  means  of  co-operation  is  his  vote.  Hence,  to  deprive  any  class  of  citizens  of 
the  right  to  vote  is  to  work  against  the  interests  of  the  country.  A  system  of  plural 
voting  based  on  differences  of  ability,  education,  etc.,  while  it  may  have  much  in  its 
favor,  is  not  the  best  for  democracy.  Instead,  the  single  vote  system  combined  with 
the  device  of  proportional  representation  is  to  be  recommended.  Secondly,  if  the 
democratic  ideal  is  to  be  achieved,  it  will  require  the  election  to  office  of  those  most 
competent.  They  should  have  the  skill  of  technicians  and  jurists,  but  judging  from 
past  parliaments  this  has  not  always  been  the  case.  Thirdly,  the  democratic  ideal 
rests  on  the  loyal  and  upright  aims  of  the  official  representing  authority,  the  states- 
man, the  minister.  That  France  has  not  always  had  such  men  in  power  is  also  but  a 
matter  of  history.  Lastly,  associated  in  the  direction  of  the  government,  but  not 
elected,  is  the  official  or  fonctionnaire.  Under  the  present  system  he  is  often  nameless 
and  his  responsibility  is  lost  in  that  of  his  minister.  This  has  often  resulted  in  grave 
errors  being  covered  up.  To  remedy  this  condition,  only  such  persons  should  be 
appointed  who  are  manifestly  fitted  for  the  work,  and  they  should  be  allowed  to  put 
their  own  personality  into  prominent  relief.  The  question  now  is,  "Has  the  new 
Chamber  the  ability  to  carry  out  tliese  reforms  without  friction  and  without  check?" 
— M.  L'Abb6  Siguret,  La  Rcforme  Socialc,  June,  1920.  C.  V.  R. 

Der  wirtschaftliche  Wiederaufbau  Deutschlands. — In  spite  of  the  many  achieve- 
ments which  the  revolution  has  brought,  the  new  Germany  has  not  been  able  to 
cope  successfully  with  all  the  demands  which  the  consequences  of  a  defeat  have 
made  upon  it.  Germany  is  not  only  suffering  from  grave  errors  in  the  diplomatic 
and  political  policies  pursued  by  its  leaders  during  the  war  but  also  from  a  lack  of 


RECENT  LITERATURE  389 

raw  materials.  The  low  exchange  value  has  made  it  difficult  to  procure  raw  materials 
and  has  forced  many  industries  to  idleness,  in  spite  of  heavy  contracts;  only  those 
establishments  which,  owing  to  their  participation  in  war  production,  were  enabled 
to  lay  in  a  supply  of  raw  materials  are  able  to  meet  the  high  demand  for  production. 
The  scarcity  of  goods  has  resulted  in  an  enormous  rise  in  prices.  The  high  cost  of 
li\'ing  has  caused  strikes  for  higher  wages,  which  permanently  hinder  production. 
The  desire  to  profit  at  the  expense  of  the  consumer  controls  the  capitalist  of  today 
more  than  ever,  and  the  consumer  is  more  and  more  at  the  mercy  of  large  combi- 
nations. In  spite  of  a  trend  toward  industrial  democracy,  capitalism  has  never 
flourished  more  than  today.  The  measures  which  the  government  is  adopting  to 
cope  with  the  situation  are  utter  failures,  because  they  are  derived  from  the  old 
capitalistic  regime.  The  most  important  problem  for  Germany  today  is  that  con- 
cerning coal.  The  production  of  coal  has  been  diminished  owing  to  the  prolonged 
war,  and  the  unfavorable  attitude  of  the  workers,  who  object  to  working  for  a  capital- 
istic clique.  In  spite  of  governmental  control  and  distribution,  no  relief  can  be  found, 
especially  since  the  necessity  of  delivering  immense  amounts  to  the  entente  reduces 
the  supply  at  the  disposal  of  Germany.  If  Germany  is  to  be  brought  out  of  economic 
chaos,  a  change  in  the  management  of  production  of  the  mines  must  be  undertaken. 
No  other  branch  of  industry  has  been  developed  to  a  stage  so  highly  favorable  to  the 
transference  of  the  means  of  production  to  society  as  this.  A  private  monopoly 
exists;  competition  is  at  a  standstill.  The  ownership  has  become  so  removed  from 
the  productive  process  that,  in  many  cases,  it  is  not  known  who  the  stockholders 
are.  The  director  of  the  "Harpener  Bergwerksaktiengesellschaft"  declared  that 
last  year  thirteen  million  marks  of  dividends  had  not  been  collected,  and  that  this 
stock  is  probably  in  the  hands  of  foreign  capitalists.  Why  not  abolish  absent  owner- 
ship altogether?  Similarly,  other  branches  of  industry  must  be  brought  under  more 
rigid  control. — Theodor  August  Schmidt,  Die  Neure  Zeit,  June  4,  1920.      L.  M.  S. 

Russian  Co-operative  Movement. — Russia  is  over  twice  as  large  as  the  United 
States,  with  fully  93  per  cent  of  its  population  rural  and  only  about  7  per  cent  urban. 
Due  to  the  strenuous  climate  and  lack  of  means  of  transportation,  the  people  have 
lived  in  small  communities  and  the  spirit  of  co-operation  has  always  been  present. 
There  are  four  modern  types  of  co-operative  enterprise  in  Russia:  consumers', 
producers',  savings  or  credit,  and  insurance  co-operative  societies.  The  local  con- 
sumers' societies  are  united  into  regional  unions,  some  of  which  build  and  conduct 
their  own  factories.  The  regional  unions  unite  into  an  All  Russian  Central  Union 
of  Consumers'  Societies.  In  1918  its  membership  consisted  of  500  federations, 
comprising  40,000  local  societies,  and  about  12,000,000  individual  members.  The 
producers'  societies  are  organized  for  the  marketing  of  eggs,  butter,  flax,  hemp,  etc. 
These  local  societies  are  members  of  central  bodies  organized  according  to  their  general 
specialties.  Credit  societies  exist  that  the  farmers  may  have  a  place  to  deposit  their 
savings,  or  that  they  may  obtain  credit  to  make  improvements  on  their  homesteads. 
The  various  co-operative  societies  also  make  use  of  the  credit  societies  to  carry  on 
their  business.  These  credit  societies  are  also  organized  on  the  regional  union  and 
central  head  plan.  The  Moscow  People's  Bank  is  thus  owned  and  controlled  by  the 
unions  and  local  societies.  Co-operative  insurance  came  into  existence  during  the  war, 
and  has  already  been  managed  on  a  large  scale  by  co-operative  societies.  The 
educational  activities  of  the  co-operatives  include  courses  of  instruction  to  prepare 
young  people  to  become  instructors,  lecturers,  bookkeepers,  etc.,  while  the  peasant 
universities  teach  agriculture,  home  economics,  and  civics.  The  success  of  the 
Russian  co-operatives  seems  assured  and  permanent,  since  even  during  1918  over 
$5,000,000,000  (par)  worth  of  goods  were  handled.  The  movement  is  deeply  rooted 
in  the  history  of  the  country,  and  is  not  hostile  to  any  political  system  which  will 
simply  leave  it  alone. — A.  J.  Zelenko,  Monthly  Labor  Review,  June,  1920.   C.V.  R. 

The  Trend  toward  Industrial  Democracy. — This  trend,  which  is  analogous  to 
the  political  movement  toward  democracy,  can  best  be  studied  in  England.  A 
hundred  years  ago  England  was  controlled  by  a  political  aristocracy.  At  the  same 
time  the  indutrial  life  of  the  nation  was  dominated  by  a  small  circle.  The  new  inven- 
tions of  the  industrial  revolution  went  into  the  hands  of  a  few,  which  gave  them  a 


390  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

great  advantage,  ^^^len  the  workmen  began  to  organize,  the  employers  app)ealed  to 
an  aristocratic  and  therefore  sympathetic  legislature,  and  a  great  body  of  class  legis- 
lation favorable  to  the  industrial  aristocracy  resulted.  The  capitalists  were  credited 
with  being  the  producers  of  wealth  and  with  making  England  rich;  but  she  was 
becoming  rich  only  at  the  top,  while  at  the  bottom  there  was  poverty  to  the  extent 
of  absolute  destitution.  The  effect  of  the  introduction  of  machinery  and  large  amounts 
of  capital  and  the  adoption  of  a  new  industrial  organization  was,  under  the  influence  of 
laissez  faire,  deleterious  to  the  masses.  By  a  series  of  parliamentary  acts  the 
suffrage  has  been  extended  so  that  since  1918  England  stands  out  in  form  the  most 
complete  democracy  of  any  large  nation.  There  have  been  breaks  also  in  the  indus- 
trial aristocracy,  but  this  is  a  more  complex  process.  The  first  Factory  Act  was 
passed  in  1802  and  since  then  the  government  has  gradually  narrowed  the  field  of 
the  old  aristocratic  control.  The  government  has  also  entered  industry  by  taking 
over  the  telegraphs,  parcel  post,  etc.  Since  1844  the  co-operative  movement  has 
been  gaijaing  power  and,  in  combination  with  the  rising  Labor  party  and  the  trade 
union  movement,  tlie  political  potentialities  in  the  future  are  great.  This  great 
democratic  system  of  industry  is  being  built  up  to  take  the  place  of  the  capitalistic 
management  when  it  fails  to  function  satisfactorily.  The  trade  union  movement 
has  been  growing  for  more  than  a  century  until  the  old  aristocracy  of  economic  life 
has  come  to  an  end.  At  the  present  time  no  employer  can  carry  on  his  industry  with- 
out dealing  with  a  union.  This  trend  is  a  continuous  one.  There  has  beefl  no  period 
of  twenty  years,  during  the  last  hundred  years,  in  which  the  old  control  by  the  employers 
was  not  intruded  upon  by  a  more  socially  controlled  treatment  of  industrial  conditions. 
Such  a  continuous  movement,  so  wide  in  its  extent,  cannot  be  expected  to  stop  short 
of  some  great  epoch-making  change.  It  obviously  has  all  the  characteristics  of  evolu- 
tion in  human  society.  This  same  spirit  of  democracy  is  coming  into  the  public 
attitude  toward  industry  in  other  countries  as  well  as  in  England.  It  is  a  movement 
which  has  aU  the  characteristics  of  long  continuance,  of  wide  application,  of  continuity, 
and  of  rising  force  as  the  years  have  gone  on. — E.  P.  Chej-ney,  Annals  of  the  American 
Academy  of  Political  and  Social  Science,  }\x\y,  1920.  W.  C.  S. 

Employees  Representation  in  Standard  Oil. — A  few  years  ago  the  strikes  affecting 
the  Standard  Oil  Company,  and  also  the  Colorado  Fuel  and  Iron  Company,  chal- 
lenged the  attention  of  the  whole  country.  Managers  of  labor  began  to  look  for  the 
causes  of  Industrial  strife  and  found  that  before  the  introduction  of  power  machinery 
the  workman  kept  his  identity,  but  that  since  then  the  trend  is  to  take  it  away  from 
him.  The  principle  of  employee  representation  was  introduced  to  restore  this  identity 
to  him  again.  Men  are  to  feel  that  they  are  individuals  and  not  check  numbers,  and 
that  the  right  of  appeal  is  open  to  them  for  the  just  settlement  of  all  grievances.  On 
April  I,  19 18,  representatives  of  employees  and  management  of  the  Standard  Oil 
Company  met  and  adopted  a  joint  agreement  in  all  matters  in  which  the  employees 
and  management  were  mutually  concerned.  The  agreement  created  an  employment 
department  which  outlined  the  acts  for  which  discharge  without  notice  might  be  the 
penalty,  and  protected  employees  from  immediate  discharge  for  other  acts  requiring 
disciplinary  measures.  All  wage  adjustments  are  made  in  joint  conferences,  subject 
to  the  approval  of  the  board  of  directors.  Everything  concerning  working  conditions 
can  be  brought  up  before  a  joint  conference,  and  if  any  man  has  a  grievance  he  can 
have  it  settled  by  the  conference,  with  the  privilege  always  of  appealing  to  the  higher 
executives,  up  to  the  president  of  the  company.  Some  of  the  topics  which  have 
come  up  for  discussion  in  which  adjustments  have  been  made  are  wage  adjustments, 
hours,  working  conditions,  the  representation  plan  itself,  etc.  The  results  of  the  plan 
show  first  that  the  employees  are  learning  some  of  the  difficulties  of  management. 
They  are  more  broad  minded  and  they  see  the  other  side  of  the  business.  Secondly, 
they  are  not  continually  grabbing  for  themselves.  In  certain  instances  the  employee 
representatives  actually  voted  against  wage  increases  asked  by  their  constituents. 
Thirdly,  the  workmen  have  learned  that  it  is  no  longer  necessary  to  strike  in  order 
to  attract  attention  to  a  grievance,  but  that  adequate  machinery  exists  for  its  orderly 
settlement.  Finally,  in  proof  of  the  above  contention,  the  company  has  eliminated 
every  strike  of  importance  for  the  past  two  years. — Burton  Kline,  Industrial  Manage- 
ment, May  and  June,  1920.  C.  V.  R. 


RECENT  LITERATURE 


391 


BIBLIOGRAPHY 


BOOKS 


Adams,     Edwin     W.      A     Community 

Civics:  A  textbook  in  loyal  citizenship. 

New  York:    Scribner.    Pp.   vi+sSs. 

$1.32. 
Alexander,    William    H.     College    and 

Religion.    Boston:  Badger.    Pp.  107. 

$1.50- 

Aubert,  E.,  et  Letort,  J.  Pour  que  la 
France  vive.  L'Alcoolisation  de  la 
France.  Paris:  Bossard.  Pp.  190. 
Fr.  3 .  60. 

Ayusawa,  Iwao  F.  International  Labor 
Legislation.  New  York:  Longmans. 
(Studies  in  History,  Economics,  and 
Public  Law,  Whole  No.  208.)  Pp. 
258.    $2.00. 

Baker,  R.  S.  New  Industrial  Unrest: 
Reasons  and  Remedies.  New  York: 
Doubleday.    Pp.231.    $2.00. 

Barnes,  M.  C.  Neighboring  New  Ameri- 
cans. New  York:  Revell.  Pp.  68. 
$0.60. 

Baroja  y  Nessi,  Pio.  Youth  and  Egolatry. 
Tr.  from  the  Spanish  by  Jacob  S.. 
Fasset,  Jr.,  and  Frances  L.  Phillips. 
New  York:  Knopf.     Pp.265.     $i.7S- 

Beard,  Mary.  Short  History  of  the 
American  Labor  Movement.  New 
York:  Harcourt.    Pp.  174-    $iSo- 

Beck,  Herbert  Mains.  Aliens'  Text-book 
on  Citizenship :  Laws  of  Naturalization 
of  the  United  States.  Philadelphia: 
McKay.  Pp.100.   Si  .00,  paper  $0.50. 

Becker,  Carl  Lotus.  The  United  States; 
an  E-xperiment  in  Democracy.  New 
York:  Harper.    Pp.332.    $2.50. 

Beer,  M.  A  History  of  British  Socialism. 
London:  Bell.    Pp.  424-     ^5S- 

Beimett,  G.  Martin  and  Margaret.  The 
First  Five  Years  of  a  Child's  Life. 
London:  Harrap.     Pp.  127.     2s. 

Bergson,  Henri  L.  Mind  Energy.  New 
York:  Holt.     Pp.  x+262.     $2.50. 

Bertram,  Arthur.  In  Darkest  Christen- 
dom and  a  Way  Out  of  the  Darkness. 
London:  Allen.     Pp.256.     3s.  gd. 

Bishop,  Ernest  S.  Narcotic  Drug  Prob- 
lem.   London:   Macmillan.    8s. 

Bjerre,  Poul  Carl.  History  and  Prac- 
tice of  Psychoanalysis.  Auth.  tr.  by 
Elizabeth  N.  Barrow.  New  ed.  Bos- 
ton: Badger.  Pp.  294.  $4.00. 
Bland,  J.  O.  P.  Men,  Manners  and 
Morals  in  South  America.  New  York: 
Scribner.    Pp.  viii+319.    $4.50. 


Blyth,  M.  E.  The  Passing  of  the  Poor. 
London:  Society  for  Promoting  Chris- 
tian Knowledge.    Pp.  126.     3s.  6d. 

Bosanquet,  Bernard.  What  Religion  Is. 
New  York:  Macmillan.  Pp.  xii-f-8i. 
$1.40. 

Briggs,  Thomas  H.  The  Junior  High 
School.  Boston:  Houghton.  Pp.  x-j- 
350.    $2.00. 

Brooks,  J.  G.  Labor's  Challenge  to  the 
Social  Order:  Democracy  its  Own 
Critic  and  Educator.  New  York: 
Macmillan.     Pp.441.     $0.75. 

Brown,  A.  J.  Mastery  of  the  Far  East. 
The  story  of  Korea's  transformation 
and  Japan's  rise  to  supremacy  in  the 
Orient.  New  York:  Scribner.  Pp. 
671.    $6.00. 

Broz,  Alexander.  First  Year  of  the 
Czecho-Slovak  Republic.  London: 
Twentieth  Century  Press  Ltd.   Pp.  80. 

Brunhes,  Jean.  Human  Geography.  An 
attempt  at  a  positive  classification, 
principles,  and  examples.  Tr.  by  T.  C. 
La  Compte;  ed.  by  Isaiah  Bowman  and 
Richard  Elwood  Dodge;  illus.  with  77 
maps  and  diagrs.  and  146  half-tones. 
Chicago:  Rand  McNally.  Pp.  i6-f 
648.     $5.00. 

Bureau,  Paul.  L'Indiscipline  des  moeurs. 
fitude  de  science  sociale.  Paris:  Bloud 
et  Gay.    Pp.  608.     Fr.  15. 

Buriin,  Natalie  Curtis  (Mrs.  H.  Paul 
Burlin).  Songs  and  Tales  from  the 
Dark  Continent.  New  York:  Schir- 
mer.    $4 .  00. 

Bury,  John  Bagnell.  The  Idea  of 
Progress:  an  Inquiry  into  Its  Origin 
and  Growth.  New  York:  Macmillan. 
Pp- 15+377.    $5-50. 

Cantaouzene,  Princess.  Russian  People: 
Revolutionary  Recollections.  New 
York:  Scribner.     Pp.321.     $3.00. 

Cecile,  Marie,  and  Chomel,  Anselm.  A 
Red  Cross  Chapter  at  Work.  Indi- 
anapolis: Chapter  of  American  Red 
Cross.     Pp.374.    $2.00. 

Charles  Chapin's  Story:  Written  in 
Sing  Sing  Prison.  New  York:  Put- 
nam.   Pp.  xxiii+334.    $2.50. 

Cofi6n,  Henry  S.    A  More  Christian  In- 
dustrial Order.     London:    Macmillan. 
5s.  6d. 
Cohen,  J.  H.     American  Labor  Policy. 
London:  Macmillan.     5s.  6d. 


392 


THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 


Cole,  G.  D.  K.  Chaos  and  Order  in 
Industry.  London:  Methuen.  Pp.  300. 
7J.  bd. 

Courtney,  Janet  E.  Free  Thinkers  of 
the  Nineteenth  Century.  New  York: 
Button.    Pp.  260.    $6.00. 

Clark,  Thomas  .\rkle.  The  High  School 
Boy  and  His  Problems.  New  York: 
Macmillan.     Pp.  7  +  194.     $1.20. 

Crane,  Thomas  Frederick.  Italian  Social 
Customs  of  the  Sixteenth  Century  and 
Their  Influence  on  the  Literature  of 
Europe.  (Cornell  Studies  in  English, 
Vol.  5).  New  Haven,  Conn.:  Yale 
Univ.  Press.     Pp.689.     $6.00. 

Cromie,  William  J.  Group  Contests  for 
Playground  and  School.  London: 
Macmillan.     85. 

Dangennes,  B.  La  Femme  moderne. 
Les  Formes  nouvelles  des  elans  du 
coeur.     Paris:  Nilsson.     Fr.  3.50. 

Diers,  Marie.  Die  deutsche  Frauenfrage 
inihremBusammenhang  m.  Geschichte, 
Volkswirtschaft  u.  Politik.  Potsdam: 
Stiftungsverlag.     Pp.  188. 

Diffendorfer,  Ralph  Eugene.  The 
Church  and  the  Community.  New 
York:  Interchurch  World  Movement 
of  North  America.  Pp.  12  +  177  (3  P- 
bibl.),  il.  plan  diagrs.  $0.75;  paper, 
$0.50. 

Dreyer,  Georges,  and  Hanson,  George  F. 
The  Assessment  of  Physical  Fitness  by 
Correlation  of  Vital  Capacity  and 
Certain  Measurements  of  the  Body. 
London:   Cassell.    Pp.  115.     105. 

Drysdale,  Bessie  Ingman.  Labour 
Troubles  and  Birth  Control.  Lon- 
don: Heinemann.     Pp.  96.    35.  6d. 

Dullberg,  J.  Sterile  Marriages.  Lon- 
don: T.  W.  Laurie.    Pp.  264,    6s. 

Duprat,  G.  L.  La  Psychologie  sociale. 
Sa  nature  et  ses  principales.  Paris: 
G.  Doin.    Pp.  375.     Fr.  8.50. 

Ellinger,  A.  Sozialisierung  d.  Bau-  u. 
Wohnungswesens.  Hrsg.  vom  deut- 
schen  Bauarbeiterverband.  Hamburg : 
F.  Paeplow.     Pp.  160. 

Emerson,  Guy.  The  New  Frontier.  A 
study  of  the  American  liberal  spirit,  its 
frontier,  origin,  and  its  application  to 
modern  problems.  New  York:  Holt. 
Pp.  12+314.    $2.00. 

Fay,  C.  R.  Life  and  Labour  in  the 
Nineteenth  Century.  London:  Cam- 
bridge University  Press.    Pp.  328.  20s. 

Findlay,  J.  J.  An  Introduction  to 
Sociology.  For  social  workers  and 
general  readers.  London:  Longmans. 
Pp.  315.    6s. 


Foster,  William  Z.  The  Great  Steel 
Strike  and  Its  Lessons.  New  York: 
Huebsch.  Pp.ix+265.  $1.75;  paper 
$1 .00. 

Frankel,  Lee  Kaufer,  and  Fleisher, 
Alexander.  The  Human  Factor  in  In- 
dustry. Written  with  the  co-operation 
of  Laura  S.  Seymour.  New  York: 
Macmillan.    Pp.  Q+366.    S3. 00. 

Freud,  Sigmund.  A  General  Introduc- 
tion to  Psychoanalysis.  Introd.  by 
G.  Stanley  Hall.  New  York:  Boni  & 
Liveright.    Pp.406.    $4.50. 

Gallagher,  Patrick.  America's  Aims  and 
Asia's  Aspirations.  New  York:  Cen- 
tury.   Pp.xiii+499.    $3.50. 

Gallicahan,  Walter  M.  Letters  to  a 
Young  Man  on  Love  and  Health. 
New  York:  Stokes.     Pp.119.     Si. 00. 

.    Youth    and    Maidenhood:     Sex 

knowledge  for  young  people.  London : 
Health  Promotion.     Pp.  90.  2s.  6d. 

Gilchrist,  R.  N.  Indian  Nationality. 
New  York:  Longmans.  Pp.  246. 
$2.75. 

Glasier,  John  B.  The  Meaning  of 
Socialism.  New  York:  T.  Seltzer. 
Pp.  249.    $2.00. 

Gompers,  Samuel.  Labor  and  the  Em- 
ployer. Comp.  and  ed.  by  Hayes 
Robbins.  New  York:  Button.  Pp. 
7+320.    $3.50. 

Grossmann,  Max  G.  Freie  Sozialisier- 
ung! Bie  prakt.  Form  d.  Betriebs- 
sozialisierung.  Jena:  W.  Gensch. 
Pp.  71. 

Hall,  Granville  Stanley.  Morale;  the 
Supreme  Standard  of  Life  and  Conduct. 
New  York:  Appleton.  Pp.  9+377. 
$3- 00. 

Halliburton,  William  B.,  Ed.  Physi- 
ology and  the  National  Needs.  New 
York:  Button.     Pp.  162.    $4.00. 

Hanifan,  L.  J.  Community  Center. 
(Teacher  Training  Series.)  New  York : 
Silver.     Pp.  214. 

Hasbach,  W.  A  History  of  the  English 
Agricultural  Labourer.  London:  King. 
Pp.  481.     125.  6d. 

Heath,  Emily.  The  Romance  of  Home 
Life.  London:  Gardner,  Barton.  Pp. 
213-     5^- 

Herbert,  Sydney.  Nationality  and  Its 
Problems.  London:  Methuen.  Pp. 
182.     ss. 

Hericourt,  J.  The  Social  Biseases: 
Tuberculosis,  Syphilis,  Alcoholism, 
Sterility.  London:  Routledge.  Pp. 
246.     Ts.  6d. 


RECENT  LITERATURE 


393 


Hicks,  Frederick  Charles.  The  New 
World  Order.  International  Organiza- 
tion, International  Law,  International 
Co-operation.  Garden  City,  N.Y.: 
Doubleday,  Page.  Pp.  8+496.  (31  p. 
bibl.)     $3.00. 

Hill,  David  S.  Introduction  to  Voca- 
tional Education.  New  York:  Mac- 
millan.     Pp.  xvii+483.     $1.60. 

Hindus,  Maurice  G.  The  Russian  Peas- 
ant and  the  Revolution.  New  York: 
Holt.    Pp.  12+327.    $2.00. 

Hoher,  Dr.  Ernst.  Sanitats-u.  Sozial- 
gesetzgebung.    Prag:     J.    G.    Calve. 

Pp.  75- 

Hollingworth,  Leta  A.  Stetter  (Mrs. 
Harry  Levi  Hollingworth).  The  Psy- 
chology of  Subnormal  Children.  New 
York:  Macmillan.  Pp.19+288.  $1.80. 

Imle,  Dr.  Fanny.  Die  Frau  in  Politik. 
Eine  Einfiihrung  in  d.  Staats-u. 
Wirtschaftsleben  f.  Frauen  u.  Jung- 
frauen.  Freiburg:  Herder  &  Co. 
Pp.  iii+198. 

Interchurch  World  Movement.  World 
Survey,  by  the  Interchurch  World 
Movement  of  North  America.  Re- 
vised preliminary  statement  and  bud- 
get. Vol.  I,  American  volume;  Vol.  2, 
foreign  volume  and  a  statistical  mirror. 
Library  ed.  2  vols.  New  York: 
Interchurch  World  Movement.  Pp. 
316;  221.    Bds.  $2.00. 

Jahrbuch  d.  Bundes  deutscher  Frauen- 
vereine.  1920.  (Die  Frau  im  neuen 
Deutschland)  Leipzig:  B.  G,  Teubner. 
Pp.  xvi+59-}-i43- 

Jones,  David  Boardman.  Amethysts. 
A  series  of  social  ajid  ethical  essays. 
London:  E,  Mathews.  Pp.  241. 
75.  6d. 

Jones,  Earnest,  Treatment  of  the  Neu- 
roses. London:  Bailliere.  Pp.  241. 
los.  6d. 

Jones,  T.  Harry.  Social  Economics. 
London:  Methuen.    Pp.  250.    6s. 

Jope-Slade,  Christine.  The  Bread  and 
Butter  Marriage.  London:  Hodder 
&  Stoughton.     Pp.  243.  2s. 

Kellog,  Laura  C.  Our  Democracy  and 
the  American  Indian.  A  comprehen- 
sive presentation  of  the  Indian  situa- 
tion as  it  is  today.  Kansas  City: 
Burton.    Pp.  xx+is2.    $2.00. 

Kenealy,  Arabella.  Feminism  and  Sex- 
Extinction.  New  York:  Dutton.  Pp. 
X+313.    $5.00. 

Kerlin,  Robert  Thomas,  comp.  The 
Voice  of  the  Negro.  1919.  New 
York:  Dutton.    Pp.  12+188.     $2.50. 


Kidd,  Benjamin.  Social  Evolution. 
New  ed.  London:  Methuen.  Pp. 
391.    85.  6d. 

Lane-Claypon,  Janet  E.  The  Child 
Welfare  Movement.  London:  Bell. 
Pp.  341.     7s. 

Lewis,  Ida  Belle.  The  Education  of 
Girls  in  China.  New  York:  Teachers 
Coll.,  Columbia  Univ.  Pp.  92  (3  p. 
bib!.),  tabs,  diagrs.,  fold.,  map.     $1 .  60. 

Long,  B.  K.,  Ed.  The  Framework  of 
Union.  A  comparison  of  some  union 
constitutions;  with  a  sketch  of  the 
development  of  union  in  Canada, 
Australia  and  Germany;  and  the  text 
of  the  Constitutions  of  the  United 
States,  Canada,  Germany,  Switzer- 
land, and  Australia.  New  York: 
Oxford  University  Press.  Pp.  viii+ 
208.    $3.40. 

Lovett,  Sir  Verney  (Sir  Harrington  Ver- 
ney).  A  History  of  the  Indian 
Nationalist  Movement.  New  York: 
Stokes.     Pp.  285.    $4.00. 

Maciver,  R.  M.  Community.  A  socio- 
logical study.  London:  Macmillan. 
Pp._4S5.     15^. 

Mackinnon,  James.  The  Social  and 
Industrial  History  of  Scotland.  From 
the  earliest  times  to  the  union.  Glas- 
gow: Blackie.     Pp.  191.    9^. 

Mansbridge,  Albert.  An  Adventure  in 
Working-Class  Education.  The  story 
of  the  Workers'  Educational  Associa- 
tion, 1903-15.  London:  Longmans. 
Pp.  93. _   6s. 

Marchionini,  Karl.  Der  Bankrott  d. 
Reformsozialismus.  Leipzig:  Leipzi- 
ger  Buchdr.     A-G. 

Marett,  R.  R.  Psychology  and  Folk- 
lore. London:  Methuen.  Pp.  285. 
75.  6d. 

Massachusetts.  Bureau  of  Statistics. 
Labor  Legislation  in  Massachusetts 
19x5  to  1919,  Inclusive,  with  Index  to 
Bills  Affecting  Labor  Introduced  during 
the  Session  of  19 19  and  Other  Matter 
Bearing  on  the  Labor  Legislation  of 
the  Year  1919.    Boston.    Pp.  221. 

Maugham,  R.  C.  F.  The  Republic  of 
Liberia.  New  York:  Scribner.  Pp. 
293.    $6.50. 

McDougall,  William.  Anthropology  and 
History,  being  the  Robert  Boyle  Lec- 
ture.   Milford.     2s. 

.    The     Group     Mind.     London: 

Cambridge  University  Press.  Pp. 
320.     2IS. 

Mead,  El  wood.  Helping  Men  Own 
Farms.    A    practical     discussion     of 


394 


THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 


government  aid  in  land  settlement. 
New  York:  M&cmillan.  Pp.  228. 
$2.25. 

Mead,  G.W.  Great  Menace:  American- 
ism or  Bolshevism?  New  York: 
Dodd.    Pp.  153.     $1.25. 

Mees,  Charles  Edward  Kenneth.  The 
Organization  of  Industrial  Scientific 
Research.  New  York:  Mc Gray-Hill. 
Pp. 170.     $2.00. 

Miller,  Arthur  H.  Leadership.  Lon- 
don: Putnam.     75.  dd. 

Moore,  Edward  C.  West  and  East. 
The  expansion  of  Christendom  and 
the  naturalization  of  Christianity  in 
the  Orient  in  the  sLxth  centur>'.  New 
York:  Scribner.    Pp.xii-l-421.    $4.00. 

Moore,  Justin  Hartley,  comp.  The 
World  Beyond.  Passages  from  Orien- 
tal and  primitive  religions.  New 
York:    Crowell.     Pp.  143.    $1.50. 

Murray,  John  M.  The  Evolution  of 
an  Intellectual  New  York:  Ejiopf. 
Pp.  224.    $3.00. 

Neve,  Frederick  W.  The  Church  of 
the  Living  Waters.  Boston:  Badger. 
Pp.  60.    $1.50. 

O'Brien,  George.  An  Essay  on  Mediae- 
val Economic  Teaching.  New  York: 
Longmans.     Pp.  84-242.    $4.75. 

Owen,  Dorothy  Tudor.  The  Child 
Vision.  A  study  in  mental  develop- 
ment and  expression.  London:  Long- 
mans.   Pp.  196.     6^.  6d. 

Owen,  Robert.  The  Life  of  Robert 
Owen  by  Himself.  With  an  introd. 
by  M.  Beer.  New  York:  Knopf. 
Pp- 13+352.    $1.50. 

Paine,  William.  A  New  Aristocracy  of 
Comradeship.  London:  L.  Parsons. 
Pp.  190.    4J.  6d. 

Palgrave,  Robert  H.  I.,  ed.  Dictionary 
of  Political  Economy.  New  York: 
Macmillan.  New  Edition,  3  vols. 
Pp.  2500.    $30.00. 

Paterson,  Marcus.  The  Shibboleths  of 
Tuberculosis.  London:  Murray.  Pp. 
239,     los.  6d. 

Paul,  Eden  and  Cedar.  Creative  Revo- 
lution: A  study  of  communist  ergatoc- 
racy.  London:  Allen  &  Unwin.  Pp. 
224.    &s.  6d. 

Pratt,  James  Bissett.  The  Religious 
Consciousness.  A  psychological  study. 
New  York:  Macmillan.  Pp.  8-I-488. 
$4.00. 

Queen,  Stuart  Alfred.  The  Passing  of 
the  County  Jail.  Individualism  of 
misdemeanants  through  a  unified  cor- 


rectional system.  Menasha,  Wis.:  G. 
Banta  Pub.    Pp.  13 -|- 156.    $1.50. 

Radice,  Shelia.  The  New  Children. 
Talks  with  Dr.  Maria  Montessori. 
New  York:  Stokes.     Pp.168.     $1.50. 

Rees,  J.  F.  A  Social  and  Industrial  His- 
tory of  England,  1815-1918.  London: 
Methuen.    Pp.  204.     55. 

Richardson,  Clemont,  ed.  The  National 
Cyclopedia  of  the  Colored  Race. 
Montgomery,  Ala.:  National  Pub.  Co. 
Pp.  640.    $15.00. 

Roe,  Alfred  S.  Chance  and  Change  in 
China.  New  York:  Doran.  Pp.  298. 
$3 • 00. 

Ross,  Edward  Alsworth.  The  Principles 
of  Sociology.  New  York:  Century. 
Pp.  700.    $4.00. 

Sanger,  Margaret  H.  Woman  and  the 
New  Race.  New  York:  Brentano's. 
Pp.  xii-l-234.    $2.00. 

Sanlaville,  F.  Socialisme  et  Propri6t6. 
Paris:  F.  Alcan.     Pp.  258.    Fr.  6. 

Schneider,  Herbert  Wallace.  Science 
and  Social  Progress.  A  philosophical 
introduction  to  moral  science.  New 
York:  Lemcke  &  Buechner.  Pp. 
10-I-65.    Paper  $1 .  25. 

Sechrist,  F.  K.  Educadon  and  the 
General  Welfare.  A  textbook  of 
school  law,  hygiene,  and  management. 
New  York:  Macmillan.  Pp.443.  $i.6o. 

Snedden,  David  Samuel.  Vocational 
Education.  New  York:  Macmillan. 
Pp.  11+587-     $2.25. 

Stevinson,  E.  Pictures  of  Social  Life. 
From  earliest  times  to  the  fourteenth 
century.  London:  Harrap.  Pp.  153. 
35.  6d. 

Studensky,  Paul.  Teacher's  Pension 
Systems  in  the  United  States.  Lon- 
don: Appleton.     155. 

Siirsen,  Dr.  Elisab.  Die  Frau  im 
deutschen  Reichs  u.  Landesstaats- 
dienst.  Mannheim:  J.  Bensheimer, 
Verl.     Pp.  X-I-122. 

Sweet,  William  E.,  ed.  The  Rise  of 
Methodism  in  the  West.  Cincirmati: 
Methodist  Book  Concern.  Pp.  207. 
$1.25. 

Swisher,  Walter  Samuel.  Religion  and 
the  New  Psychology.  A  psycho- 
analytic study  of  religion.  Boston: 
Jones.     Pp.  15  +  261.    $2.00. 

Tansley,  A.  J.  The  New  Psychology  and 
Its  Relation  to  Life.  London:  Allen 
&  Unwin.     Pp.  283.     10s.  6d. 

Tead,  Ordway,  and  Metcalf,  Henry  C. 
Personnel  Administration.  New  York : 
McGray-Hill.    Pp.520.    $5.00. 


RECENT  LITERATURE 


395 


Thomas,  Edward.  Industty,  Emotion, 
and   Unrest.    New  York:    Harcourt. 

Pp.  4+255-  Si.75- 
Todd,  A.  J.  Scientific  Spirit  ^nd  Social 
Work.  London:  Macmillan.  los.Gd. 
Trabue,  M.  R.  and  Stockbridge,  F.  P. 
Measure  Your  Mind :  The  Mentimeter 
and  How  to  Use  It.  New  York: 
Doubleday.     Pp.349.     $3.00. 

Ulianov,  V.  I.  (N.  Lenin).  State  and 
Revolution.  Marxist  teaching  on  the 
state  and  the  task  of  the  proletariat  in 
the  revolution.  London:  Allen  & 
Unwin.     Pp.  123.     2s. 

U.S.  Bureau  of  Education.  Library. 
List  of  References  on  Education  for 
Citizenship.  Washington:  Govt.  Ptg. 
Office. 

U.S.  House  Com.  on  Immigration  and 
Naturalization.  Temporary  Admis- 
sion of  Illiterate  Mexican  Laborers. 
Hearings  on  H.  J.  res.  271,  relating  to 
the  temporary  admission  of  illiterate 
Mexican  laborers,  January  26-30,  and 
February  2,  1920.  Apply  to  Congress- 
man.    Pp.  375. 

Walling,  William  English.  Sovietism. 
The  A  B  C  of  Russian  bolshevism — 
according  to  the  bolshevists.  New 
York:    Button.    Pp.  9+220.    $2.00. 

Wame,  F.  J.  Chartography  in  Ten 
Lessons.  Washington,  D.C.:  The 
Author,  Southern  Bldg.  Pp.  159. 
$5  00. 

Watts,  Frank.  Education  for  Self- 
Realisation  and  Social  Service.  Lon- 
don: University  of  London  Press. 
Pp.  275.     75.  6d. 

Weeks,  R.  M.  Socializing  the  Three 
R's.     London:  Macmillan.     65. 

White,  William  A.  The  Mental  Hygiene 
of  Childhood.  London:  Heinemann. 
Pp.  208.     6s. 

Williams,  Fred  V.  The  Hop-heads. 
Personal  experiences  among  the  users 
of  "dope"  in  the  San  Francisco  under- 


world; with  articles  on  drug  habits  by 
Dr.  Wm.  C.  Hassler  and  John  J. 
O'Meara.  San  Francisco:  W.  N. 
Brunt,  766  Mission  St.  Pp.  133. 
$1.50;  paper,  $0.75. 
Wright,  H.  P.  Young  Man  and  Teach- ' 
ing.  New  York:  Macmillan.  Pp. 
211.    $1.50, 

The  altention  of  our  readers  is  especially 
called  to  the  following  very  excellent  studies: 

Methodist  Episcopal  Church  South.  A 
Social  Survey  of  North  Madison  Ward 
Richmond,  Virginia.  Conducted  unde 
the  Direction  of  the  Survey  Secretary 
of  the  Home  Department.  Richmond, 
Va.    Pp.  54. 

U.S.  Department  of  Labor.  Children's 
Bureau.  Courts  in  the  United  States 
Hearing  Children's  Cases.  Results  of 
a  Questionnaire  Study  Covering*  the 
Yeari9i8.  By  Evelina  Belden.  (De- 
pendent, Defective,  and  Delinquent 
Classes  Series  No.  8,  Pub.  No.  65.) 
Washington:    Govt.  Ptg.  Office.    Pp. 

115. 

U.S.  Department  of  Labor.  Children's 
Bureau.  Infant  Mortality.  Results 
of  a  Field  Study  in  Saginaw,  Mich. 
Based  on  Births  in  One  Year.  By  Nila 
F.  Allen.  (Infant  Mortality  Series 
No.  9,  Pub.  No.  52).  Washington: 
Govt.  Ptg.  Office.     Pp.  91.     Charts. 

U.S.  Department  of  Labor.  Children's 
Bureau.  Laws  Relating  to  "Mothers' 
Pensions"  in  the  United  States, 
Canada,  Denmark  and  New  Zealand. 
By  Laura  A.  Thompson.  (Legal 
Series  No.  4,  Pub.  No.  63).  Washing- 
ton:  Govt.  Rg.  Office.    Pp.  316. 

U.S.  Department  of  Labor.  Children's 
Bureau.  Maternity  Benefit  Systems 
in  Certain  Foreign  Countries.  By 
Henry  J.  Harris.  (Legal  Series  No.  3, 
Pub.  No.  57.)  Washington:  Govt. 
Pt|.  Office.    Pp.  206. 


ARTICLES 


Ahem,  John  M.  An  Inquiry  into  the 
Mentality  of  Juvenile  and  Adult  De- 
linquents.   Lancet  199: 107-9,  July  '20. 

Bridges,  Horace  J.  The  Revival  of  Spirit- 
ualism.    Standard  7:14-22,  July  '20. 

Buckley,  A.  Government  Housing  in 
Canada.  Nat.  Mun.  Rev.  9:481-84, 
August  '20. 

Bumham,  William.  The  Hygiene  of 
Sleep.  Pedag.  Sem.  27: 1-34,  March '20. 

Carruthers,  V.  T.  Instinct  and  Hysteria. 
Brit.  Med.  Jour.  792-93,  June  i2,'20. 


Chasles,   Pierre.    La    Vie    Politique    et 

ficonomique  en  Theco-Slovaquie    Rev. 

pol.  et  parlem.  103:415-23,  June  '20. 
Cheyney,    E.    P.    The    Trend    toward 

Industrial   Democracy.      Ann.   Amer. 

Acad.    Pol.    and    Soc.    Sci.    90:1-9, 

July  '20. 
Covington,  J.  Harry.    The  Preservation 

of  Industrial  Peace.    Ann.  Amer.  Acad. 

Pol.  and  Soc.  Sci.  90:159-64,  July  '20. 
Cox,     Harold.    War    and     Population. 

Edinb.  Rev.  232:192-208,  July  '20. 


396 


THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 


Degouy,    Centre- Amiral.    La    Belgique, 

L'Escant  et  Le  Rhin.    Rev.  de  deux 

mon.  58:146-64,  July  i,  '20. 
de    Lapradelle,    G.    Les    Consequences 

ficonomiques  de  la  Paix  de  Versailles. 

Rev.    pol.    et    parlem.     103:309-29, 

June  '20. 
de    Nouvion,     Georges.    La    Crise    du 

Logement.    Jour,  des  6con.  66: 320-29, 

June  '20. 
Dowling,  Oscar.    The  Sociological  Aspect 

of    the    Hookworm    Disease.    Amer. 

Jour.  Pub.  Health  10:595-98,  July  '20. 
Drouineau,  Dr.  G.    Le  Conseil  Suplrieur 

et  les  Commissions  D6partementales 

de  la  natality.    Rev.  philan.  41:169- 

72,  May  '20. 
Ely,     Richard    T.    Land    Speculation. 

Jour.  Farm  Econ.  2:121-35,  July  '20. 
Farnell,  F.  J.    The  Detective  versus  the 

Psychopath.    Jour.    Crim.    Law    and 

Crim.  11:198-208,  August  '20. 
Fellows,    A.     Divorce    Reform.     Fortn. 

Rev. 107:143-54,  July  '20. 
Firth,  J.  B.    England  and  the  European 

System.  Fortn. Rev. 107: i7-3oJuly'2o. 
Fish,  E.  H.    What  Are  We  Likely  to  Do 

about  Labor  Unions  ?    Indus.  Manag, 

60:109-12,  August  '20. 
Girard,  Joseph.    L'fivolution  Actuelle  de 

la  Legislation  Francaise  des  Pensions 

Civiles  et  Militaires.    Jour,  des  econ. 

66:304-19,  June  '20. 
Hunter,  Walter  S.    The  Modification  of 

Instinct  from  the  Standpoint  of  Social 

Psychology.    Psych.  Rev.  27:247-69, 

July  '20. 
Klopstock,    Paul.    Poland   Today:    Its 

Problems,  Opportunities,  and  Progress. 

Econ.  World  106:151-55,  July  '20. 
.    La   Propriety   et   L'Etat.    Jour. 

des.  econ.  66:345-46,  June  '20. 
.    La  Question  de  la  Socialisation 

aux  Pays-Bas.    Rev.  du  travail.  21: 

798-808,  June  15,  '20. 
Lecelletier,  F.    Le  Mouvement  fiCono- 

mique  et  Social  en  France.     R^f.  soc. 

79:388-95,  June  '20. 
L^vy,  Raphael- Georges.    La  Juste  Paix. 

— Les  Finances  des  Allies.    Rev.  de 

deux  mon.  57:834-62,  June  15,  '20. 
.    La  Juste  Paix. — IV.    La  Capacity 

de  Paiement  de  L'Allemagne.    Rev.  de 

deux  mon.  58:165-90,  July  i,  '20. 
Liebman,  W.  H.    Some  General  Aspects 

of  Family  Desertion.     Soc.  Hyg.  6: 

197-212,  April  '20. 
Lindsay,  James.    The  Ethical  Value  of 

Individuality.    Intern.    Jour.    Ethics 

30:423-49,  July  '20. 


Litchfield,  P.  W.  The  Industrial  Rep- 
resentation Plan  in  the  Akron  Fac- 
tories of  the  Goodyear  Tire  and 
Rubbei;  Company.  Ann.  Amer.  Acad. 
Pol.  and  Soc.  Sci.  90:27-31,  July  '20. 

Lyon,  L.  S.  A  Funtional  Approach  to 
Social-Economic  Data.  Jour.  Pol. 
Econ.  28:529-64,  July  '20. 

Mangin,  General.  Comment  Finit  La 
Guerre.  V.  Les  Causes  de  la  Victoire. 
Rev.  de  deux  mon.  57:774-815,  June 
15,  '20. 

.    Comment  Finit  La  Guerre.     VI. 

Les  Consequences  de  la  Victoire.  Rev. 
de  deux  mon.  58:74-101,  July  1,  '20. 

Marett,  R.  R.  Primitive  Relationships. 
Quar.  Rev.  234:161-76,  July  '20. 

Meeker,  Royal.  Analysis  of  Some 
Effects  of  Increased  Cost  of  Living 
on  Family  Budgets.  Mo.  Lab.  Rev. 
11:  i-io,  July  '20. 

Melcher,  W.  A.  Dual  Personality  in 
Handwriting.  Jour.  Crim.  Law  and 
Crim.  11:209-16,  August  '20. 

Merrill,  Maud  A.  A  Study  in  Tempera- 
ment of  a  Social  Misfit.  Jour.  Delinq. 
5:95-116,  July  '20. 

Meyer,  Ernst  Christopher.  Community 
Medicine  and  Public  Health.  Amer. 
Jour.  Pub. -Health  10:489-97,  June  '20. 

.      Minimum      Quantity       Budget 

Necessary  to  Maintain  a  Worker's 
Family  of  Five  in  Health  and  Decency. 
Mo.  Lab.  Rev.  10:1-18,  June  '20. 

Mitchell,  David,  and  Forbes,  Harriet. 
Malnutrition  and  Health  Education. 
Pedag.  Sem.  27:36-66,  May  '20. 

Muller,  H.  G.  Are  the  Factors  of 
Heredity  Arranged  in  a  Line  ?  Amer. 
Naturalist  54:97-121,  March- April '20. 

Newman,  Bernard  J.  A  Program  for 
Organizing  and  Co-ordinating  Indus- 
trial Clinics.  Amer.  Jour.  Pub.  Health 
10:637-47,  August  '20. 

Northcott,  Clarence  H.  What  the 
British  Worker  Is  Thinking.  Indus. 
Manag.  60:96-99,  August  '20. 

Parker,  Florence  E.  Aims  and  Possi- 
bilities of  the  Consumers,  Co-operative 
Movement.  Mo.  Lab.  Rev.  10:117- 
22,  June  '20. 

.  Elements  of  Success  and  Possi- 
bilities of  Saving  in  Co-operative 
Stores.  Mo.  Lab.  Rev.  11:136-42, 
July  '20. 

Parkhurst,  Helen  H.  The  Evolution 
of  Mastery.  Intern.  Jour.  Ethics 
30:404-22,  July  '20. 

Pearson,  F.  A.  Social  Significance  of 
Hired    Labor,    Small    Holdings,    and 


RECENT  LITERATURE 


397 


Small  Farms.    Jour.  Farm  Econ.  2: 

163-68,  July  '20. 
Prince,  E.  A.  Colonies  for  Mental  Defect- 
ives. Soc.  Hyg.  6:357-64,  July  '20. 
Raflalovich,    Arthur.    Le    Bolchevisme. 

Jour,  des  econ.  66:358-66,  June  '20. 
Riegel,  Vernon  M.    A  Study  of  Rural 

School    Conditions    in    Ohio.     Amer. 

Jour.  Sch.  Hyg.  4:26-27,  June  '20. 
Rivers,  W.  H.  R.    Psychology  and  the 

War.  Scribner's  68: 161-66,  August  '20. 
Rolofif,  B.  C.    The  "Eugenic"  Marriage 

Laws    of    Wisconsin,    Michigan,    and 

Indiana.    Soc.Hyg.  6: 227-54, Aprirao. 
Schaub,     Edward     L.    A     Sociological 

Theory    of    Knowledge.    Phil.    Rev. 

29:319-39,  July  '20. 
Siguret,     M.     I'abbe.    LTdeal     D6mo- 

cratique    et    la    Chambre    Nouvelle. 

Ref.  soc.  79:359-/4,  June  '20. 
Smith,    C.    W.    The    Unadjusted    Girl. 

Soc.  Hyg.  6:401-6,  July  '20. 
Stevens,    N.    E.    Radicalism    and    Re- 
search   in    America.     Science    52:25- 

30,  July  '20. 
Stevenson,  J.  A.    Agrarian  Movement 

in  Canada.     Edinb.  Rev.  232:96-113, 

July  '20. 
Theroude,  Dr.  Femand.     Sachons  filever 

NosEnfants.    Rev.  philan.  41: 173-76, 

May  '20. 


Timmis,  Henry.     Canada  and  the  United 

States:   Their  Common  Interests  and 

Interdependence.     Econ.  World   106: 

189-90,  Aug.  7,  '20. 
Tynan,  Katharine.    Mother's  Pensions. 

The  Child  10:433-37,  July  '20. 
Val^ry,    Jean.    La    Vie    Politique    aux 

fitats-Unis.    Rev.     pol.     et     parlem. 

103:424-31,  June  '20. 
Veiller,     L.    Slumless     America.     Nat. 

Mun.  Rev.  9:493-508,  August  '20. 
Vermeil,     Edmond.     L'Allemagne    Poli- 
tique.   I,    La    Nouvelle     Forme    du 

Pangermanisme.     Rev.  de  deux  mon. 

58:347-73,  July '20. 
Westrup,  C.  W.     Af  Egteskabets  His- 

torie.    Tilskueren  :  53-66,  July  20. 
Wild,  Robert  B.     Some  Racial  Problems, 

Social  Evils,  and  Modern   Crusades. 

Lancet  199:52-54,  July  '20. 
Wright,   H.  W.    Rational   Self-Interest 

and  the  Social  Adjustment.    Intern. 

Jour.  Ethics.  30:394-403,  July  '20. 
Wright,  Henry  W.    The  Basis  of  Human 

Association.    Jour.  Phil.,  Sci.  Methods 

17:421-30,  August  '20. 
Zelenko,  A.  J.    The  Russian  Co-operative 

Movement.    Mo.  Lab.  Rev.  10:122- 

30,  June  '20- 


PAMPHLETS 


American  Association  for  Organizing 
Family  Social  Work.  Directory  of 
Family  Social  Work  Societies  in  the 
United  States  and  Canada,  together 
with  a  Selected  List  of  Foreign  Soci- 
eties. New  York:  The  Association. 
Pp.  32.     $0.50. 

Anthony,  A.  W.  Movement  toward 
church  Unity  in  Local  Communities. 
A  summar>'  of  experience  in  the  field 
of  co-operation.  156  5th  Ave.,  New 
York:  Home  Mission  Council.  Pp. 
20.    $0.05. 

Basset,  W.  R.  Common  Sense  of 
Workers'  Representation.  New  York: 
Miller,  Franklin,  Basset  &  Co.     Pp.  1 5  • 

Bayley,  B.  D.  Survey  of  Shop  Com- 
mittee Plans.  Rochester,  N.Y.:  The 
Underwriters.     Pp.  6. 

Benas,  B.  B.  Zionism:  The  Jewish 
National  Movement  with  Appendices 
of  Diplomatic  Documents  and  Con- 
temporary Articles  and  Reports.  Lon- 
don: Zionist  Organization.     Pp.86. 

Bloedel  Donovan  Shop  Committee  Or- 
ganization.   Timberman.     Pp.  35. 


Bowser,  S.  F.,  &  Co.,  inc.  Bowser  Plan 
of  Shop  Control  by  Joint  Representa- 
tion, in  Effect  June  4,  1919.  Fort 
Wayne,  Ind. :  The  Company.     Pp.  40- 

Brewer,  D.  C.  Americanization:  What 
does  the  Word  Signify?  Boston: 
Order  and  Liberty  Alliance,  Grace 
Boothby,  Sec.     Pp.  16. 

Callarman,  C.  W.  Community  Organi- 
zation. Stillwater,  Okla.:  Agriculture 
and  Mechanical  College.     Pp.  20. 

Church  and  Social  Service,  Being  the 
Report  of  a  Committee  Appointed  by 
the  Archbishop  of  Canterbury.  Lon- 
don: Society  for  Promoting  Christian 
Knowledge.     Pp.    70.     is. 

Committee  of  Fourteen  in  New  York 
City.  Annual  Report,  1918-19.  New 
York:    The  Committee.     Pp.  48. 

Cooley,  E.  J.  Needs  of  Probation  in  the 
Magistrates'  Courts,  City  of  New 
York.  New  York,  300  Mulberry  St.: 
The  Author.     Pp.  12. 

Delevingne,  Malcolm.  International 
Regulation  of  Labor  under  the  Peace 


398 


THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 


Treaty.  Manchester:  College  of 
Technology.     Pp.  21. 

Farley,  J.  W.  Statistics  and  Politics. 
Memphis,  Tenn.:  The  Author.  Pp. 
31.    $1.00. 

Gest,  W.  P.  Modernization  of  Charity. 
An  explanation  of  Philadelphia  founda- 
tion. Philadelphia:  Fidelity  Trust 
Co.     Pp.  31. 

Great  Britain.  Home  Oflfice.  Employ- 
ment of  Children.  London:  H.  M. 
Stationery  Office.     Pp.12.     2d. 

Great  Britain.  Home  Office.  Labour 
Administration  in  America.  Notes  of 
inquiries  made  by  home  office  repre- 
sentatives attending  the  Washington 
labor  conference.  London:  H.  M. 
Stationery  Office.     Pp.  16.     id. 

Great  Britain.  Ministry  of  Health. 
Outline  of  the  Practice  of  Preventive 
Medicine.  A  memorandum  addressed 
to  the  Minister  of  Health.  George 
Newman.  London:  H.  M.  Stationery 
Office.     Pp.  124.     6d. 

Great  Britain.  Ministry  of  Labour.  In- 
dustrial Councils.  (Industrial  Reports 
No.  4)  London:  H.  M.  Stationery 
Office.     Pp.  32.  3<f. 

Great  Britain.  Ministry  of  Labour. 
Minutes  of  Evidence  Taken  before  the 
Committee  of  Inquiry  into  the  Scheme 
of  Out-of-work  Donation.  London: 
H.  M.  Stationery  Office.  Pp.  202. 
15.  gd. 

Great  Britain.  Overseas  Settlement 
Committee.  Report  for  the  Year 
Ended  31st  December,  1919.  London: 
H.  M.  Stationery  Office.     Pp.  19.     t,s. 

Henderson,  Arthur.  International  La- 
bour Standards.  London:  Weslyan 
Methodist  Social  Welfare  Department. 
Pp.  16.     2d. 

Howe,  F.  C.  Lynch  Law  and  the 
Immigrant  Alien.  New  York:  Peoples 
of  America  Society.     Pp.  8. 

Inoculating  against  Bolshevism.  How 
two  emploj'ers  profited  when  they  gave 
their  workers  a  voice  in  the  manage- 
ment. New  York:  Miller,  Franklin, 
Basset  &  Co.     Pp.  15. 

Jenkins,  E.  C.  B.  Crime:  Its  Cause  and 
Cure.  Kansas  City,  Mo.:  E.  C.  B. 
Jenkins,  Sec,  Board  Police  Com- 
missioners.    Pp.  31. 

Johnston,  T.  B.  Industrial  Councils 
and  their  Possibilities.  Manchester: 
College  of  Technology.     Pp.  25. 

Johnston,  T.  B.  Industrial  Peace:  Capi- 
tal, Labour  and  Consumer,  a  Basis  of 


Co-operation.  Bristol:  Arrowsmith. 
Pp.  21.     6d. 

Kansas  University  Extension  Division. 
Armourdale:  A  City  within  a  City. 
The  report  of  a  social  survey  of 
Armourdale,  a  community  of  12,000 
people  living  in  the  industrial  district 
of  Kansas  City,  Kansas.  Lawrence, 
Kan.:  The  University.     Pp.  91. 

Keith,  Arthur.  Nationality  and  Race 
from  an  Anthropologist's  Point  of 
View.     Oxford    University.     Pp.    39. 

25. 

Labor  Temple  Evening  High  School. 
Progress:  1919  Annual.  Los  Angeles: 
The  High  School.     Pp.  46. 

Litchfield,  P.  W.  Industrial  Republic: 
A  Study  in  Industrial  Economics. 
Boston:    Houghton.     Pp.  95.     $1.20. 

Loomis,  F.  D.  .\mericanization  in  Chi- 
cago. The  report  of  a  survey  made 
bj^  authority  and  under  direction  of 
the  Chicago  community  trust.  Chi- 
cago: Chicago  Community  Trust. 
Pp.  40. 

Lunacharski,  A.  Self-Education  of  the 
Workers.  .\  cultural  task  of  the 
struggling  proletariat;  educational 
work  of  the  Russian  Soviets.  Lon- 
don: Workers  Socialist  Federation. 
Pp.  7.  2d. 

Lyon,  L.  S.  Survey  of  Commercial 
Education  in  the  Public  High  Schools 
of  the  United  States.  Chicago:  Uni- 
versity of  Chicago.     Pp.   59.     $0.65. 

Mayo,  Elton.  Democracy  and  Freedom. 
An  essay  in  social  logic.  (W.E..\.  Ser. 
No.  i)  New  York:    Macmillan.     Pp. 

74- 

McKinstry,  Helen.  Healthof  the  Worker. 
NewYork:  H.  L.  Doherty&Co.  Pp. 
12. 

Moss,  W.  R.,  and  Mortenson,  P.  A. 
Making  Americans:  How  and  Why. 
Chicago:  Association  of  Commerce. 
Pp.  II. 

Nash,  A.  M.,  and  Porteus,  S.  D.  Edu- 
cational Treatment  of  Defectives. 
Vineland,  N.  J.:  Department  of 
Research,  Training  School.  Pp.  19. 
$0.25. 

National  Child  Welfare  Association. 
Brief  List  of  Books  on  Child  Welfare. 
New  York:    The  Association.     Pp.  3. 

National  Consumers'  League.  Preven- 
tive Measures  for  Industrial  Unrest. 
The  record  of  the  National  Consumers' 
League.  New  York:  The  League. 
Pp.7. 


RECENT  LITERATURE 


399 


National  Information  Bureau.  Bulletin 
of  National  and  Interstate  Organiza- 
tions Engaged  in  Social,  Civic  and 
Philanthropic  Work,  Approved  as 
Worthy  of  the  Support  of  those 
Interested  in  their  Aims  and  Purposes. 
New  York:  The  Bureau.     Pp.  20. 

National  Urban  League.  Idea  Made 
Practical.  A  record  of  co-operation; 
annual  report,  1919.  New  York:  The 
League.     Pp.  25. 

Parmoor,  Lord,  and  Others.  Famine  in 
Europe.  The  facts  and  suggested 
remedies,  being  a  report  of  the  Inter- 
national Economic  Conference  called  by 
the  Fight  the  Famine  Council.  Lon- 
don: Swarthmore.     Pp.  126.     45.     6d. 

Pedersen,  Sverre.  Example  of  Town 
Plaiming  in  Nonvay.  Notes  on  the 
development  of  Trondhjem.  London: 
International  Garden  Cities  and  Town 
Planning  Association.     Pp.  11.     ^d. 

Playne,  C.  E.  German  Pacifism  during 
the  War.  London:  National  Peace 
Council,  75  Avenue  Chambers,  South- 
ampton Row.     Pp.  II.     ^d. 

Pope,  R.  A.  Solution  of  the  Housing 
Problem  in  the  United  States.  Wash- 
ington: American  Institute  of  Archi- 
tects.    Pp.  12. 

Porteus,  S.  D.  Cephalometry  of  Feeble- 
minded. Vineland,  N.  J.:  Training 
School.     Pp.24.    $0.15. 

Pray,  K.  L.  M.  Brief  on  State  Aid  to 
Private  Social  Agencies  in  Pennsyl- 
vania. Harrisburg:  Committee  on 
Constitutional  Amendment  and  Re- 
vision.    Pp.  65. 

Provisions  of  the  German  Works  Councils 
Act.  Commerce  Repts.  No.  124.  Pp. 
ii54~5S-     May  26,  1920. 

Rushmore,  Elsie  Mitchell.  A  Bibliog- 
raphy for  Social  Workers  among 
Foreign-Born  Residents  of  the  United 
States.  New  York:  Y.W.C.A.  Na- 
tional Bd.,  Div.  of  Works  for  Foreign- 
Born  Women.     Pp.  38.     Paper  gratis. 

Russian  Soviet  Government  Bureau. 
Code  of  Labor  Laws  of  Soviet  Russia, 
with  an  Answer  to  a  Criticism  by  Mr. 
William  C.  Redfield.  (Soviet  Russia 
Pamphlet  No.  i.)  no  W.  40th  St., 
New  York.     Pp.48.    So.  10. 

Scott,  E.  J.  Negro  Migration  during  the 
War.  Washington:  Carnegie  Endow- 
ment   for    International    Peace.     Pp. 

Sims,  E.  W.  Fighting  Crime  in  Chicago: 
the  Crime  Commission.  Chicago: 
Chicago  Crime  Commission.     Pp.  8. 


U.S.  Bureau  of  Education.  Education 
for  the  Establishment  of  Democracy 
in  the  World.  By  P.  P.  Claxton. 
Washington.     Pp.  22. 

.     Class    Extension    Work    in    the 

Universities  and  Colleges  of  the  United 
States.  ByA.  J.  Klein.  Washington. 
Pp.  48. 

.     Library.     List  of  References  on 

Consolidation  of  Schools.  Washing- 
ton: Gov.  Ptg.  Office.     Pp.  8.    Paper. 

.    Public  Discussion  and  Information 

Service  of  University  Extension.  By 
W.  S.  Bittner.     Washington.     Pp.  54. 

U.S.  Council  of  National  Defense. 
Women  in  Industry  Com.  New  Orleans 
Div.  Conditions  of  Women's  Labor 
in  Louisiana:  New  Orleans  and 
Louisiana  Industrial  Survey.  New 
Orleans:  State  Com.  of  Labor.  Pp. 
139.     Postage  $0.05. 

U.S.  Department  of  Agriculture.  Beau- 
tifying the  Farmstead.  By  F.  J. 
Mulford.    Washington.     Pp.  65. 

U.S.  Department  of  State.  Memo- 
randum on  Certain  Aspects  of  the 
Bolshevist  Movement  in  Russia: 
Character  of  Bolshevist  Rule,  Economic 
Results  of  Bolshevist  Control,  Bolshe- 
vist Program  of  World  Revolution. 
Washington.     Pp.  55. 

.     Report  on  International  Action 

and  Machiner>'  Regulating  Labor  and 
International  Labor  Opinion  as  to 
Peace  Terms.     Washington.     Pp.  20. 

.     Report    on    Labor    Situation    of 

Australia.    Washington.     Pp.  8. 

.     Report    on    Labor    Situation    of 

Belgium.    Washington.     Pp.  22. 

.    Report    on    Labor    Situation    in 

Canada.     Washington.     Pp.  40. 

.     Report    on    Labor    Situation    of 

Denmark.    Washington.     Pp.  20. 

.     Report    on    Labor    Situation    of 

France.    Washington.     Pp.  36. 

.     Report    on    Labor    Situation    of 

Germany.     Washington.     Pp.  16. 

.    Report    on    Labor    Situation    in 

Great  Britain.     Washington.     Pp.  43. 

.     Report    on    Labor    Situation    of 

Italy.     Washington.     Pp.  31. 

.     Report  on  Labor  Situation  of  the 

Netherlands.    Washington.     Pp.  44. 

.     Report    on    Labor    Situation    of 

Norway.    Washington.     Pp.  12. 

.     Report    on    Labor    Situation    of 

Sweden.    Washington.     Pp.  18. 

U.S.  House.  Com.  on  Immigration  and 
Naturalization.  Communist  and  an- 
archist   deportation    cases;     hearings 


400 


THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 


before  a  subcommittee,  April  21-24, 
1920;  statement  of  W.  A.  Blackwood; 
decisions;  digest  of  cases  deported  on 
U.S.  transport  "Buford."  Apply  to 
Congressman.     Pp.  158. 

U.S.  House.  Naturalization  and  Citizen 
ship:  Report.  Apply  to  Congressman. 
Pp.4. 

.    Percentage  Plans  for  Restriction 

of  Immigration:  Hearings,  Jime  12-14, 
18-20,  and  Sept.  25,  1919.  Apply  to 
Congressman.     Pp.  296. 

U.S.  House.  Com.  on  Rules.  Attorney 
General  A.  Mitchell  Palmer  on  Charges 
Made  Against  Department  of  Justice 
by  Louis  F.  Post  and  Others:  Hearings, 
June  1-2,  1920.  Apply  to  Congress- 
man.    Pp.  209. 

U.S.  Library  of  Congress.  List  of 
References  on  Intermarriage  of  Races 
with  Special  Emphasis  on  Immigrants. 
Washington.     Pp.  4  (Mim.). 

.    List    of    References    on    Labor 

Questions  in  tlie  United  States  and 
Foreign  Countries,  1700  to  1850.  Pp. 
10.     (Typew.)     $0.60. 


U.S.  Library  of  Congress.  List  of 
References  on  Married  Women  in 
Industry   Exclusive   of  Home   Work. 

To  be  obtained  only  through  P.  A.  I.  S. 

Pp.  II.     (Typew.)     $0.65. 

.    List  of  References  on  the  Origin 

and  Development  of  the  Present 
Unrest.     Pp.  3.     (Tj^jew.)  $0.25. 

U.S.  Senate.  Committee  on  Foreign 
Relations.  Russian  Propaganda:  Re- 
port.   Apply  to  Congressman.     Pp.  15. 

U.S.  Women's  Bureau.  Hours  and 
Conditions  of  Work  for  Women  in 
Industry  in  Virginia.  Washington: 
Govt.  Ptg.  Office.     Pp.  32. 

Voluntary  Parenthood  League.  Some 
Comment  on  the  Famous  "loi  Neediest 
Cases"  of  the  New  York  Times.  New 
York:  The  League.     Pp.14. 

Wallin,  J.  E.  Problem  of  Mental  Sub- 
normality.  St.  Louis,  Mo.:  Central 
Council  of  Social  Agencies.     Pp.  8. 

Whitley,  J.  R.  Works  Committee  and 
Industrial  Councils:  Their  Beginnings 
and  PossibUiries.  Manchester:  Col- 
lege of  Technology.     Pp.  25. 


THE   AMERICAN 

JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 


VOLDME   XXVI  JANUARY        I92I  NUMBER4 


SOCIOLOGY  AND  THE  SOCIAL  SCIENCES 


ROBERT  E.  PARK 
University  of  Chicago 


I.       SOCIOLOGY  AND       SCIENTIFIC      HISTORY 

Sociology  first  gained  recognition  as  an  independent  science 
with  the  publication,  between  1830  and  1842,  of  Auguste  Comte's 
Cours  de  Philosophie  Positive.  Comte  did  not,  to  be  sure,  create 
sociology.  He  did  give  it  a  name,  a  program,  and  a  place  among 
the  sciences. 

Comte's  program  for  the  new  science  proposed  an  extension  to 
politics  and  to  history  of  the  positive  methods  of  the  natural 
sciences.  Its  practical  aim  was  to  establish  government  on  the 
secure  foundation  of  an  exact  science  and  give  to  the  predictions 
of  history  something  of  the  precision  of  mathematical  formulae. 

We  have  to  contemplate  social  phenomena  as  susceptible  of  prevision, 
like  all  other  classes,  within  the  limits  of  exactness  compatible  with  their 
higher  complexity.  Comprehending  the  three  characteristics  of  political 
science  which  wc  have  been  examining,  prevision  of  social  phenomena  sup- 
poses, first,  that  we  have  abandoned  the  region  of  metaphysical  idealities, 
to  assume  the  ground  of  observed  realities  by  a  systematic  subordination 
of  imagination  to  observation;  secondly,  that  poUtical  conceptions  have 
ceased  to  be  absolute,  and  have  become  relative  to  the  variable  state  of  civili- 
zation, so  that  theories,  following  the  natural  course  of  facts,  may  admit  of 
our  foreseeing  them;   and,  thirdly,  that  permanent  political  action  is  limited 

401 


402  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

by  determinate  laws,  since,  if  social  events  were  always  exposed  to  disturbance 
by  the  accidental  intervention  of  the  legislator,  human  or  divine,  no  scientific 
prevision  of  them  would  be  possible.  Thus,  we  may  concentrate  the  condi- 
tions of  the  spirit  of  positive  social  philosophy  on  this  one  great  attribute 
of  scientific  prevision.  ^ 

Comte  proposed,  in  short,  to  make  government  a  technical 
science  and  politics  a  profession.  He  looked  forward  to  a  time 
when  legislation,  based  on  a  scientific  study  of  human  nature,  would 
assume  the  character  of  natural  law.  The  earlier  and  more  ele- 
mentary sciences,  particularly  physics  and  chemistry,  had  given 
man  control  over  external  nature;  the  last  science,  sociology',  was 
to  give  man  control  over  himself. 

Men  were  long  in  learning  that  Man's  power  of  modifying  phenomena 
can  result  only  from  his  knowledge  of  their  natural  laws;  and  in  the  infancy 
of  each  science,  they  believed  themselves  able  to  exert  an  unbounded  influence 

over  the  phenomena  of  that  science Social  phenomena  are,  of  course, 

from  their  extreme  complexity,  the  last  to  be  freed  from  this  pretension: 
but  it  is  therefore  only  the  more  necessary  to  remember  that  the  pretension 
existed  with  regard  to  all  the  rest,  in  their  earhest  stage,  and  to  anticipate 
therefore  that  social  science  wlQ,  in  its  turn,  be  emancipated  from  the  delusion. 
....  It  [the  existing  social  science]  represents  the  social  action  of  Man 
to  be  indefinite  and  arbitrary,  as  was  once  thought  in  regard  to  biological, 
chemical,  physical,  and  even  astronomical  phenomena,  in  the  earlier  stages 

of  their  respective  sciences The  human  race  finds  itself  delivered 

over,  without  logical  protection,  to  the  iU-regulated  experimentation  of  the 
various  poUtical  schools,  each  one  of  which  strives  to  set  up,  for  all  future 
time,  its  own  immutable  type  of  government.  We  have  seen  what  are  the 
chaotic  results  of  such  a  strife;  and  we  shall  find  that  there  is  no  chance  of 
order  and  agreement  but  in  subjecting  social  phenomena,  like  all  others,  to 
invariable  natural  laws,  which  shall,  as  a  whole,  prescribe  for  each  period, 
with  entire  certainty,  the  limits  and  character  of  political  action:  in  other 
words,  introducing  into  the  study  of  social  phenomena  the  same  positive 
spirit  which  has  regenerated  every  other  branch  of  human  speculation.^^ 

In  the  present  anarchy  of  political  opinion  and  parties,  changes 
in  the  existing  social  order  inevitably  assume,  he  urged,  the  char- 
acter, at  the  best,  of  a  mere  groping  empiricism;  at  the  worst,  of  a 
social  convulsion  Uke  that  of  the  French  Revolution.     Under  the 

*  Harriet  Martineau,  llie  Positive  Philosophy  of  Augiisle  Comte,  freely  translated 
and  condensed  (London,  1893),  II,  61. 

*  Harriet  Martineau,  op.  cil.,  II,  59-60. 


SOCIOLOGY  AND  THE  SOCIAL  SCIENCES  403 

direction  of  a  positive,  in  place  of  a  speculative  or,  as  Comte  would 
have  said,  metaphysical  science  of  society,  progress  must  assume 
the  character  of  an  orderly  march. 

It  was  to  be  expected,  with  the  extension  of  exact  methods  of 
investigation  to  other  fields  of  knowledge,  that  the  study  of  man 
and  of  society  would  become,  or  seek  to  become,  scientific  in  the 
sense  in  which  that  word  is  used  in  the  natural  sciences.  It  is 
interesting,  in  this  connection,  that  Comte's  first  name  for  sociology 
was  social  physics.  It  was  not  until  he  had  reached  the  fourth 
volume  of  his  Positive  Philosophy  that  the  word  sociological  is  used 
for  the  first  time. 

Comte,  if  he  was  foremost,  was  not  first  in  the  search  for  a 
positive  science  of  society,  which  would  give  man  that  control  over 
men  that  he  had  over  external  nature.  Montesquieu,  in  his  Spirit 
of  the  Laws,  first  published  in  1747,  had  distinguished  in  the  organi- 
zation of  society,  between  form,  ''the  particular  structure,"  and 
the  forces,  "the  human  passions  which  set  it  in  motion."  In  his 
preface  to  this  first  epoch-making  essay  in  what  Freeman  calls 
"comparative  politics,"  Montesquieu  suggests  that  the  uniformi- 
ties, which  he  discovered  beneath  the  wide  variety  of  positive  law, 
were  contributions  not  merely  to  a  science  of  law,  but  to  a  science 
of  mankind. 

I  have  first  of  all  considered  mankind;  and  the  result  of  my  thoughts 
has  been,  that  amidst  such  an  infinite  diversity  of  laws  and  manners,  they 
are  not  solely  conducted  by  the  caprice  of  fancy.^ 

Hume,  Hkewise,  put  politics  among  the  natural  sciences.^  Con- 
dorcet  wanted  to  make  history  positive.^  But  there  were,  in  the 
period  between  1815  and  1840  in  France,  conditions  which  made 
the  need  of  a  new  science  of  poHtics  peculiarly  urgent.  The  Revo- 
lution had  failed  and  the  political  philosophy,  which  had  directed 
and  justified  it,  was  bankrupt.     France  between  1789  and  1815 

^  Montesquieu,  Baron  M.  de  Sccondat,  The  Spirit  of  the  Laws,  translated  by 
Thomas  Nugent  (Cincinnati,  1873),  I,  .\xxi. 

*  David  Hume,  Inquiry  Concerning  Human  Understanding,  Part  II,  sec.  7. 

'  Condorcet,  Esquisse  d'un  tableau  historique  des  progrh  de  V esprit  humain  (1795), 
292.  See  Barth,  Die  Philosophie  des  Geschichle  als  Sociologie  (Leipzig,  1897),  Part  I, 
pp.  21-23. 


404  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

had  adopted,  tried,  and  rejected  no  less  than  ten  different  con- 
stitutions. But  during  this  period,  as  Saint-Simon  noted,  society, 
and  the  human  beings  who  compose  society,  had  not  changed.  It 
was  evident  that  government  was  not,  in  any  such  sense  as  the 
philosophers  had  assumed,  a  mere  artifact  and  legislative  con- 
struction. Civilization,  as  Saint-Simon  conceived  it,  was  a  part  of 
nature.  Social  change  was  part  of  the  whole  cosmic  process.  He 
proposed,  therefore,  to  make  politics  a  science  as  positive  as 
physics.  The  subject-matter  of  political  science,  as  he  conceived 
it,  was  not  so  much  poHtical  forms  as  social  conditions.  History 
had  been  literature.     It  was  destined  to  become  a  science.^ 

Comte  called  himself  Saint-Simon's  pupil.  It  is  perhaps  more 
correct  to  say  Saint-Simon  formulated  the  problem  for  which 
Comte,  in  his  Positive  Philosophy,  sought  a  solution.  It  was 
Comte's  notion  that  with  the  arrival  of  sociology  the  distinction 
which  had  so  long  existed,  and  still  exists,  between  philosophy,  in 
which  men  define  their  wishes,  and  natural  science,  in  which  they 
describe  the  existing  order  of  nature,  would  disappear.  In  that 
case  ideals  would  be  defined  in  terms  of  reality,  and  the  tragic 
difference  between  what  men  want  and  what  is  possible  would  be 
effaced.  Comte's  error  was  to  mistake  a  theory  of  progress  for 
progress  itself.  It  is  certainly  true  that  as  men  learn  what  is,  they 
will  adjust  their  ideals  to  what  is  possible.  But  knowledge  grows 
slowly. 

Man's  knowledge  of  mankind  has  increased  greatly  since  1842. 
Sociology,  "the  positive  science  of  humanity,"  has  moved 
steadily  forward  in  the  direction  that  Comte's  program  indicated, 
but  it  has  not  yet  replaced  history.  Historians  are  still  looking 
for  methods  of  investigation  which  will  make  history  *'sciencific." 

No  one  who  has  watched  the  course  of  history  during  the  last  generation 
can  have  felt  doubt  of  its  tendency.  Those  of  us  who  read  Buckle's  first 
volume  when  it  appeared  in  1857,  and  almost  immediately  afterwards,  in 
1859,  read  the  Origin  of  Species  and  felt  the  violent  impulse  which  Darwin 
gave  to  the  study  of  natural  laws,  never  doubted  that  historians  would  follow 
until  they  had  exhausted  every  possible  hypothesis  to  create  a  science  of 
history.     Year  after  year  passed,  and  little  progress  has  been  made.     Perhaps 

» Oeuvres  de  Saint-Simon  ei  d'Enfantin  (Paris,  1865-78),  XVII,  228.  Paul  Barth, 
op.  cil.,  Part  I,  p.  23. 


SOCIOLOGY  AND  THE  SOCIAL  SCIENCES  405 

the  mass  of  students  are  more  skeptical  now  than  they  were  thirty  years  ago 
of  the  possibility  that  such  a  science  can  be  created.  Yet  almost  every  suc- 
cessful historian  has  been  busy  with  it,  adding  here  a  new  analysis,  a  new 
generalization  there;  a  clear  and  definite  connection  where  before  the  rupture 
of  idea  was  absolute;  and,  above  all,  extending  the  field  of  study  until  it 
shall  include  all  races,  all  countries,  and  all  times.  Like  other  branches  of 
science,  history  is  now  encumbered  and  hampered  by  its  own  mass,  but  its 
tendency  is  always  the  same,  and  cannot  be  other  than  what  it  is.  That 
the  effort  to  make  history  a  science  may  fail  is  possible,  and  perhaps  probable; 
but  that  it  should  cease,  unless  for  reasons  that  would  cause  all  science  to 
cease,  is  not  within  the  range  of  experience.  Historians  will  not,  and  even 
if  they  would  they  can  not,  abandon  the  attempt.  Science  itself  would  admit 
its  own  failure  if  it  admitted  that  man,  the  most  important  of  all  its  subjects, 
could  not  be  brought  within  its  range.^ 

Since  Comte  gave  the  new  science  of  humanity  a  name  and  a 
point  of  view,  the  area  of  historical  investigation  has  vastly  widened 
and  a  number  of  new  social  sciences  have  come  into  existence — 
ethnology,  archaeology,  folklore,  the  comparative  studies  of  cul- 
tural materials,  i.e.,  language,  mythology,  rehgion,  and  law,  and  in 
connection  with  and  closely  related  with  these,  folk-psychology, 
social  psychology,  and  the  psychology  of  crowds,  which  latter  is, 
perhaps,  the  forerunner  of  a  wider  and  more  elaborate  political 
psychology.  The  historians  have  been  very  much  concerned  with 
these  new  bodies  of  materials  and  with  the  new  points  of  view  which 
they  have  introduced  into  the  study  of  man  and  of  society.  Under 
the  influences  of  these  sciences,  history  itself,  as  James  Harvey 
Robinson  has  pointed  out,  has  had  a  history.  But  with  the  inno- 
vations which  the  new  history  has  introduced  or  attempted  to 
introduce,  it  does  not  appear  that  there  have  been  any  funda- 
mental changes  in  method  or  ideology  in  the  science  itself. 

Fifty  years  have  elapsed  since  Buckle's  book  appeared,  and  I  know  of 
no  historian  who  would  venture  to  maintain  that  we  had  made  any  consid- 
erable advance  toward  the  goal  he  set  for  himself.  A  systematic  persecution 
of  the  various  branches  of  social  science,  especially  political  economy,  sociology, 
anthropology,  and  psychology,  is  succeeding  in  explaining  many  things; 
but  history  must  always  remain,  from  the  standpoint  of  the  astronomer, 
physicist,  or  chemist,  a  highly  inexact  and  fragmentary  body  of  knowledge. 
....  History  can  no  doubt  be  pursued  in  a  strictly  scientific  spirit,  but 

'Henry  Adams,  The  Degradation  of  the  Democratic  Dogma  (New  York,  1919), 
p.  126. 


4o6  TUE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

the  data  we  possess  in  regard  to  the  past  of  mankind  are  not  of  a  nature  to 
lend  themselves  to  organization  into  an  exact  science,  although,  as  we  shall 
see,  they  may  yield  truths  of  vital  importance.^ 

History  has  not  become,  as  Comte  believed  it  must,  an  exact 
science,  and  sociology  has  not  taken  its  place  in  the  social  sciences. 
It  is  important,  however,  for  understanding  the  mutations  which 
have  taken  place  in  sociology  since  Comte  to  remember  that  it  had 
its  origin  in  an  effort  to  make  history  exact.  This,  with,  to  be  sure, 
considerable  modifications,  is  still,  as  we  shall  see,  an  ambition  of 
the  science. 

II.      HISTORICAL  AND    SOCIOLOGICAL   FACTS 

Sociology,  as  Comte  conceived  it,  was  not,  as  it  has  been  char- 
acterized, "a  highly  important  point  of  view,"  but  a  fundamental 
science,  i.e.,  a  method  of  investigation  and  "a  body  of  discoveries 
about  mankind. "2  In  the  hierarchy  of  the  sciences,  sociology,  the 
last  in  time,  was  first  in  importance.  The  order  was  as  follows: 
mathematics,  astronomy,  physics,  chemistry,  biology,  including 
psychology,  sociology.  This  order  represented  a  progression  from 
the  more  elementary  to  the  more  complex.  It  was  because  history 
and  politics  were  concerned  with  the  most  complex  of  natural 
phenomena  that  they  were  the  last  to  achieve  what  Comte  called 
the  positive  character.     They  did  this  in  sociology. 

Many  attempts  have  been  made  before  and  since  Comte  to 
find  a  satisfactory  classification  of  the  sciences.  The  order  and 
relation  of  the  sciences  is  still,  in  fact,  one  of  the  cardinal  problems 
of  philosophy.  In  recent  years  the  notion  has  gained  recognition 
that  the  difference  between  history  and  the  natural  sciences  is  not 
one  of  degree,  but  of  kind;  not  of  subject-matter  merely,  but  of 
method.  This  difference  in  method  is,  however,  fundamental.  It 
is  a  difference  not  merely  in  the  interpretation  but  in  the  logical 
character  of  facts. 

Every  historical  fact,  it  is  pointed  out,  is  concerned  with  a 
unique  event.  History  never  repeats  itself.  If  nothing  else,  the 
mere  circumstance  that  every  event  has  a  date  and  location  would 

'  James  Harvey   Robinson,   The  New  History,  Essays  Illustrating  the  Modern 
Historical  Outlook  (New  York,  1912),  pp.  54-55. 
•James  Harvey  Robinson,  op.  cit.,  p.  83. 


SOCIOLOGY  AND  THE  SOCIAL  SCIENCES  407 

give  historical  facts  an  individuality  that  facts  of  the  abstract 
science  do  not  possess.  Because  historical  facts  always  are  located 
and  dated,  and  cannot  therefore  be  repeated,  they  are  not  subject 
to  experiment  and  verification.  On  the  other  hand,  a  fact  not 
subject  to  verification  is  not  a  fact  for  natural  science.  History, 
as  distinguished  from  natural  history,  deals  with  individuals,  i.e., 
individual  events,  persons,  institutions.  Natural  science  is  con- 
cerned, not  with  individuals,  but  with  classes,  types,  species.  All 
the  assertions  that  are  vahd  for  natural  science  concern  classes. 
An  illustration  will  make  this  distinction  clear. 

Sometime  in  October,  1838,  Charles  Darwin  happened  to  pick 
up  and  read  Malthus'  book  on  Population.  The  facts  of  "the 
struggle  for  existence,"  so  strikingly  presented  in  that  now  cele- 
brated volume,  suggested  an  explanation  of  a  problem  which  had 
long  interested  and  puzzled  him,  namely  the  origin  of  species. 

This  is  a  statement  of  a  historical  fact,  and  the  point  is  that 
it  is  not  subject  to  empirical  verification.  It  cannot  be  stated,  in 
other  words,  in  the  form  of  a  hypothesis,  which  further  observation 
of  other  men  of  the  same  type  will  either  verify  or  discredit. 

On  the  other  hand,  in  his  Descent  of  Man,  Darwin,  discussing 
the  role  of  sexual  selection  in  evolution  of  the  species,  makes  this 
observation:  ''Naturahsts  are  much  divided  with  respect  to  the 
object  of  the  singing  of  birds.  Few  more  careful  observers  ever 
Uved  than  Montagu,  and  he  maintained  that  the  'males  of  song- 
birds and  of  many  others  do  not  in  general  search  for  the  female, 
but,  on  the  contrary,  their  business  in  spring  is  to  perch  on  some 
conspicuous  spot,  breathing  out  their  full  and  amorous  notes,  which, 
by  instinct,  the  female  knows  and  repairs  to  the  spot  to  choose  her 
mate.'  " 

This  is  a  typical  statement  of  a  fact  of  natural  history.  It  is 
not,  however,  the  rather  vague  generahty  of  the  statement  that 
makes  it  scientific.  It  is  its  representative  character,  the  character 
which  makes  it  possible  of  verification  by  further  observation  which 
makes  it  a  scientific  fact. 

It  is  from  facts  of  this  kind,  collected,  compared,  and  classified, 
irrespective  of  time  or  place,  that  the  more  general  conclusions  are 
drawn,  upon  which  Darwin  based  his  theory  of  the  "descent  of 


408  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

man."  This  theory,  as  Darwin  conceived  it,  was  not  an  inter- 
pretation of  the  facts  but  an  explanation. 

The  relation  between  history  and  sociology,  as  well  as  the 
manner  in  which  the  more  abstract  social  sciences  have  risen  out  of 
the  more  concrete,  may  be  illustrated  by  a  comparison  between 
history  and  geography.  Geography  as  a  science  is  concerned  with 
the  visible  world,  the  earth,  its  location  in  space,  the  distribution 
of  the  land  masses,  and  of  the  plants,  animals,  and  peoples  upon 
its  surface.  The  order,  at  least  the  fundamental  order,  which  it 
seeks  and  finds  among  the  objects  it  investigates  is  spatial.  As 
soon  as  the  geographer  begins  to  compare  and  classify  the  plants, 
the  animals,  and  the  peoples  with  which  he  comes  in  contact, 
geography  passes  over  into  the  special  sciences,  i.e.,  botany, 
zoology,  and  anthropology. 

History,  on  the  other  hand,  is  concerned  with  a  world  of  events. 
Not  everything  that  happened,  to  be  sure,  is  history,  but  every 
event  that  ever  was  or  ever  will  be  significant  is  history. 

Geography  attempts  to  reproduce  for  us  the  visible  world  as 
it  exists  in  space;  history,  on  the  contrary,  seeks  to  re-create  for  us 
in  the  present  the  significance  of  the  past.  As  soon  as  historians 
seek  to  take  events  out  of  their  historical  setting,  that  is  to  say, 
out  of  their  time  and  space  relations,  in  order  to  compare  them  and 
classify  them;  as  soon  as  historians  begin  to  emphasize  the  typical 
and  representative  rather  than  the  unique  character  of  events, 
history  ceases  to  be  history  and  becomes  sociology. 

The  differences  here  indicated  between  history  and  sociology 
are  based  upon  a  more  fundamental  distinction  between  the  his- 
torical and  the  natural  sciences  first  clearly  defined  by  Windel- 
band,  the  historian  of  philosophy,  in  an  address  to  the  faculty  of 
the  University  of  Strassburg  in  1894. 

The  distinction  between  natural  science  and  history  begins  at  the  point 
where  we  seek  to  convert  facts  into  knowledge.  Here  again  we  observe  that 
the  one  (natural  science)  seeks  to  formulate  laws,  the  other  (history)  to  portray 
events.  In  the  one  case  thought  proceeds  from  the  description  of  particulars 
to  the  general  relations.  In  the  other  case  it  cUngs  to  a  genial  depiction  of  the 
individual  object  or  event.  For  the  natural  scientist  the  object  of  investiga- 
tion which  cannot  be  repeated  never  has,  as  such,  scientific  value.  It  serves 
his  purpose  only  so  far  as  it  may  be  regarded  as  a  type  or  as  a  special  instance 


SOCIOLOGY  AND  THE  SOCIAL  SCIENCES  409 

of  a  class  from  which  the  type  may  be  deduced.  The  natural  scientist  con- 
siders the  single  case  only  so  far  as  he  can  see  in  it  the  features  which  serve 
to  throw  hght  upon  a  general  law.  For  the  historian  the  problem  is  to  revive 
and  call  up  into  the  present,  in  all  its  particularity,  an  event  in  the  past.  His 
aim  is  to  do  for  an  actual  event  precisely  what  the  artist  seeks  to  do  for  the 
object  of  his  imagination.  It  is  just  here  that  we  discern  the  kinship  between 
history  and  art,  between  the  historian  and  the  writer  of  literature.  It  is  for 
this  reason  that  natural  science  emphasized  the  abstract;  the  historian,  on  the 
other  hand,  is  interested  mainly  in  the  concrete. 

The  fact  that  natural  science  emphasizes  the  abstract  and  history  the  con- 
crete wUl  become  clearer  if  we  compare  the  results  of  the  researches  of  the 
two  sciences.  However  finespun  the  conceptions  may  be  which  the  historical 
critic  uses  in  working  over  his  materials,  the  final  goal  of  such  study  is  always 
to  create  out  of  the  mass  of  events  a  vivid  portrait  of  the  past.  And  what 
history  offers  us  is  pictures  of  men  and  of  human  life,  with  all  the  wealth  of 
their  individuality,  reproduced  in  all  their  characteristic  vivacity.  Thus  do 
the  peoples  and  languages  of  the  past,  their  forms  and  beliefs,  their  struggles 
for  power  and  freedom,  speak  to  us  through  the  mouth  of  history. 

How  different  it  is  with  the  world  which  the  natural  sciences  have  created 
for  us!  However  concrete  the  materials  with  which  they  started,  the  goal  of 
these  sciences  is  theories,  eventually  mathematical  formulations  of  laws  of 
change.  Treating  the  individual,  sensuous,  changing  objects  as  mere  xmsub- 
stantial  appearances  (phenomena),  scientific  investigation  becomes  a  search 
for  the  universal  laws  which  rule  the  timeless  changes  of  events.  Out  of  this 
colorful  world  of  the  senses,  science  creates  a  system  of  abstract  concepts,  in 
which  the  true  nature  of  things  is  conceived  to  exist — a  world  of  colorless  and 
soundless  atoms,  despoiled  of  all  their  earthly  sensuous  qualities.  Such  is  the 
triumph  of  thought  over  perception.  Indifferent  to  change,  science  casts  her 
anchor  in  the  eternal  and  unchangeable.  Not  the  change  as  such  but  the 
unchanging  form  of  change  is  what  she  seeks. 

This  raises  the  question:  What  is  the  more  valuable  for  the  purposes  of 
knowledge  in  general,  a  knowledge  of  law  or'  a  knowledge  of  events?  As  far 
as  that  is  concerned,  both  scientific  procedures  may  be  equally  justified.  The 
knowledge  of  the  universal  laws  has  everywhere  a  practical  value  in  so  far  as 
they  make  possible  man's  purposeful  intervention  in  the  natural  processes. 
That  is  quite  as  true  of  the  movements  of  the  inner  as  of  the  outer  world.  In 
the  latter  case  knowledge  of  nature's  laws  has  made  it  possible  to  create  those 
tools  through  which  the  control  of  mankind  over  external  nature  is  steadily 
being  extended. 

Not  less  for  the  purposes  of  the  common  life  are  we  dependent  upon  the 
results  of  historical  knowledge.  Man  is,  to  change  the  ancient  form  of  the 
expression,  the  animal  who  has  a  history.  His  cultural  life  rests  on  the  trans- 
mission from  generation  to  generation  of  a  constantly  increasing  body  of 
historical  memories.     Whoever  proposes  to  take  an  active  part  in  this  cultural 


4IO  TEE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

process  must  have  an  understanding  of  history.  Wherever  the  thread  is  once 
broken — as  history  itself  proves — it  must  be  painfully  gathered  up  and  knitted 
again  into  the  historical  fabric. 

It  is,  to  be  sure,  true  that  it  is  an  economy  for  human  understanding  to  be 
able  to  reduce  to  a  formula  or  a  general  concept  the  common  characteristics 
of  individuals.  But  the  more  man  seeks  to  reduce  facts  to  concepts  and  laws, 
the  more  he  is  obliged  to  sacrifice  and  neglect  the  individual.  Men  have,  to 
be  sure,  sought,  in  characteristic  modern  fashion,  "to  make  of  history  a  natural 
science."  This  was  the  case  with  the  so-called  philosophy  of  history  of  posi- 
tivism. What  has  been  the  net  result  of  the  laws  of  history  which  it  has  given 
us?  A  few  trivial  generalities  which  justify  themselves  only  by  most  careful 
consideration  of  their  nimierous  exceptions. 

On  the  other  hand  it  is  certain  that  all  interest  and  values  of  life  are  con- 
cerned with  what  is  unique  in  men  and  events.  Consider  how  quickly  our 
appreciation  is  deadened  as  some  object  is  multiplied  or  is  regarded  as  one  case 
in  a  thousand.  "  She  is  not  the  first "  is  one  of  the  cruel  passages  in  Faust.  It 
is  in  the  individuality  and  the  uniqueness  of  an  object  that  all  our  sense  of 
value  has  its  roots.  It  is  upon  this  fact  that  Spinoza's  doctrine  of  the  conquest 
of  the  passions  by  knowledge  rests,  since  for  him  knowledge  is  the  submergence 
of  the  individual  in  the  universal,  the  "once  for  all"  into  the  eternal. 

The  fact  that  all  our  livelier  appreciations  rest  upon  the  imique  character 
of  the  object  is  illustrated  above  all  in  our  relations  to  persons.  Is  it  not  an 
imendurable  thought,  that  a  loved  object,  an  adored  person,  should  have 
existed  at  some  other  time  in  just  the  form  in  which  it  now  exists  for  us?  Is  it 
not  horrible  and  unthinkable  that  one  of  us,  with  just  this  same  individuality, 
should  actually  have  existed  in  a  second  edition? 

What  is  true  of  the  individual  man  is  quite  as  true  of  the  whole  historical 
process:  it  has  value  only  when  it  is  unique.  This  is  the  principle  which  the 
Christian  doctrine  successfully  maintained,  as  over  against  Hellenism  in  the 
Patristic  philosophy.  The  middle  point  of  their  conception  of  the  world  was 
the  fall  and  the  salvation  of  mankind  as  a  unique  event.  That  was  the  first  and 
great  perception  of  the  inalienable  metaphysical  right  of  the  historian  to  pre- 
serve for  the  memory  of  mankind,  in  all  their  uniqueness  and  individuality, 
the  actual  events  of  life.^ 

Like  every  other  species  of  animal,  man  has  a  natural  history. 
Anthropology  is  the  science  of  man  considered  as  one  of  the  am'mal 

'  Wilhelm  Windclband,  Geschichle  nnd  Natunvisscnschaft,  Rede  zum  Aittritl  des 
Rectorats  der  Kaiser-Wilhelms-Universitdl  Strasshurg  (Strassburg,  1900).  The  logical 
principle  outlined  by  Windclband  has  been  further  elaborated  by  Heinrich  Rickcrt  in 
Die  Grenzen  der  naturwissenschafllichen  Begriffshildung,  einc  logische  Eijilcituug  in  die 
historische  \V issenschafl  (Tubingen  u.  Leipzig,  1902).  See  also  Georg  Simrael,  Die 
Frobleme  der  Geschic/Usphilosophie,  cine  erkeniUnislheorelische  Sludie  (2d  ed.,  Leipzig, 
1915). 


SOCIOLOGY  AND  THE  SOCIAL  SCIENCES  411 

species,  Homo  sapiens.  History  and  sociology,  on  the  other  hand, 
are  concerned  with  man  as  a  person,  as  a  "political  animal," 
participating  with  his  fellows  in  a  common  fund  of  social  traditions 
and  cultural  ideals.  Freeman,  the  English  historian,  said  that 
history  was  "past  politics"  and  pohtics  "present  history."  Free- 
man uses  the  word  politics  in  the  large  and  liberal  sense  in  which 
it  was  first  used  by  Aristotle.  In  that  broad  sense  of  the  word, 
the  poHtical  process,  by  which  men  are  controlled  and  states 
governed,  and  the  cultural  process,  by  which  man  has  been  domes- 
ticated and  human  nature  formed,  are  not,  as  we  ordinarily  assume, 
different,  but  identical,  procedures. 

All  this  suggests  the  intimate  relations  which  exist  between 
history,  politics,  and  sociology.  The  important  thing,  however,  is 
not  the  identities  but  the  distinctions.  For,  however  much  the 
various  discipHnes  may,  in  practice,  overlap,  it  is  necessary  for  the 
sake  of  clear  thinking  to  have  their  limits  defined.  As  far  as 
sociology  and  history  are  concerned  the  differences  may  be  summed 
up  in  a  word.  Both  history  and  sociology  are  concerned  with  the 
life  of  man  as  man.  History,  however,  seeks  to  reproduce  and 
interpret  concrete  events  as  they  actually  occurred  in  time  and 
space.  Sociology,  on  the  other  hand,  seeks  to  arrive  at  natural 
laws  and  generalizations  in  regard  to  human  nature  and  society, 
irrespective  of  time  and  of  place. 

In  other  words,  history  seeks  to  find  out  what  actually  happened 
and  how  it  all  came  about.  Sociology,  on  the  other  hand,  seeks  to 
explain,  on  the  basis  of  a  study  of  other  instances,  the  nature  of 
the  process  involved. 

By  nature  we  mean  just  that  aspect  and  character  of  things 
in  regard  to  which  it  is  possible  to  make  general  statements  and 
formulate  laws.  If  we  say,  in  explanation  of  the  peculiar  behavior 
of  some  individual,  that  it  is  natural  or  that  it  is  after  all  "simply 
human  nature,"  we  are  simply  saying  that  this  behavior  is  what  we 
have  learned  to  expect  of  this  individual  or  of  human  beings  in 
general.     It  is,  in  other  words,  a  law. 

Natural  law,  as  the  term  is  used  here,  is  any  statement  which 
describes  the  behavior  of  a  class  of  objects  or  the  character  of  a 
class  of  acts.     For  example,  the  classic  illustration  of  the  so-called 


412  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

"universal  proposition"  familiar  to  students  of  formal  logic,  "all 
men  are  mortal,"  is  an  assertion  in  regard  to  a  class  of  objects  we 
call  men.  This  is,  of  course,  simply  a  more  formal  way  of  saying 
that ' '  men  die. "  Such  general  statements  and  ' '  laws ' '  get  meaning 
only  when  they  are  applied  to  particular  cases,  or,  to  speak  again 
the  terms  of  formal  logic,  when  they  find  a  place  in  a  syllogism, 
thus:  "Men  are  mortal.  This  is  a  man."  But  such  syllogisms 
may  always  be  stated  in  the  form  of  a  h}^othesis.  If  this  is  a 
man,  he  is  mortal.  If  a  is  6,  a  is  also  c.  This  statement,  "Human 
nature  is  a  product  of  social  contact,"  is  a  general  assertion  familiar 
to  students  of  sociology.  This  law  or,  more  correctly,  hypothesis, 
applied  to  an  individual  case  explains  the  so-called  feral  man. 
Wild  men,  in  the  proper  sense  of  the  word,  are  not  the  so-called 
savages,  but  the  men  who  have  never  been  domesticated,  of  which 
an  individual  example  is  now  and  then  discovered. 

To  state  a  law  in  the  form  of  a  hypothesis  serves  to  emphasize 
the  fact  that  laws — what  we  have  called  natural  laws  at  any  rate — - 
are  subject  to  verification  and  restatement.  Under  these  circum- 
stances the  exceptional  instance,  which  compels  a  restatement  of 
the  hypothesis,  is  more  important  for  the  purposes  of  science  than 
other  instances  which  merely  confirm  it. 

Any  science  which  operates  with  h>^otheses  and  seeks  to  state 
facts  in  such  a  way  that  they  can  be  compared  and  verified  by 
further  observation  and  experiment  is,  so  far  as  method  is  con- 
cerned, a  natural  science. 

III.      HUMAN   NATURE   AND    LAW 

One  thing  that  makes  the  conception  of  natural  history  and 
natural  law  important  to  the  student  of  sociology  is  that  in  the 
field  of  the  social  sciences  the  distinction  between  natural  and  moral 
law  has  from  the  first  been  confused.  Comte  and  the  social  phi- 
losophers in  France  after  the  Revolution  set  out  with  the  deliberate 
purpose  of  superseding  legislative  enactments  by  laws  of  human 
nature,  laws  which  were  to  be  positive  and  "scientific."  As  a 
matter  of  fact,  sociology,  in  becoming  positive,  so  far  from  effacing, 
has  rather  emphasized  the  distinctions  that  Comte  sought  to 
abolish.     Natural  law  may  be  distinguished  from  all  other  forms 


SOCIOLOGY  AND  THE  SOCIAL  SCIENCES  413 

of  law  by  the  fact  that  it  aims  at  nothing  more  than  a  description 
of  the  behavior  of  certain  types  or  classes  of  objects.  A  description 
of  the  way  in  which  a  class,  i.e.,  men,  plants,  animals,  or  physical 
objects,  may  be  expected  under  ordinary  circumstances  to  behave, 
tells  us  what  we  may  in  a  general  way  expect  of  any  individual 
member  of  that  class.  If  natural  science  seeks  to  predict,  it  is  able 
to  do  so  simply  because  it  operates  with  concepts  or  class  names 
instead,  as  is  the  case  with  history,  with  concrete  facts  and,  to  use  a 
logical  phrase,  "existential  propositions." 

That  the  chief  end  of  science  is  descriptive  formulation  has  probably 
been  clear  to  keen  analytic  minds  since  the  time  of  Galileo,  especially  to  the 
great  discoverers  in  astronomy,  mechanics,  and  dynamics.  But  as  a  definitely 
stated  conception,  corrective  of  misunderstandings,  the  view  of  science  as 
essentially  descriptive  began  to  make  itself  felt  about  the  beginning  of  the 
last  quarter  of  the  nineteenth  century,  and  may  be  associated  with  the  names 
of  Kirchhoff  and  Mach.  It  was  in  1876  that  Kirchhoflf  defined  the  task  of 
mechanics  as  that  of  "describing  completely  and  in  the  simplest  manner  the 
motions  which  take  place  in  nature."  Widening  this  a  little,  we  may  say 
that  the  aim  of  science  is  to  describe  natural  phenomena  and  occurrences  as 
exactly  as  possible,  as  simply  as  possible,  as  completely  as  possible,  as  con- 
sistently as  possible,  and  always  in  terms  which  are  communicable  and  veri- 
fiable. This  is  a  very  different  r61e  from  that  of  solving  the  riddles  of  the 
universe,  and  it  is  well  expressed  in  what  Newton  said  in  regard  to  the  law 
of  gravitation:  "So  far  I  have  accounted  for  the  phenomena  presented  to 
us  by  the  heavens  and  the  sea  by  means  of  the  force  of  gravity,  but  I  have 

as  yet  assigned  no  cause  to  this  gravity I  have  not  been  able  to  deduce 

from  phenomena  the  raison  d'etre  of  the  properties  of  gravity  and  I  have  not 
set  up  hypotheses."^ 

"We  must  confess,"  said  Prof.  J.  H.  Poynting  (1900,  p.  616),  "that 
physical  laws  have  greatly  fallen  off  in  dignity.  No  long  time  ago  they  were 
quite  commonly  described  as  the  Fixed  Laws  of  Nature,  and  were  supposed 
suflScient  in  themselves  to  govern  the  universe.  Now  we  can  only  assign 
to  them  the  humble  rank  of  mere  descriptions,  often  erroneous,  of  similarities 

which  we  believe  we  have  observed A  law  of  nature  explains  nothing, 

it  has  no  governing  power,  it  is  but  a  descriptive  formula  which  the  careless 
have  sometimes  personified."  It  used  to  be  said  that  "the  laws  of  Nature 
are  the  thoughts  of  God";  now  we  say  that  they  are  the  investigator's  formulae 
summing  up  regularities  of  recurrence.^ 

'  Newton,  Philosophia  naluralls  principia  mathemalica,  1687. 

*  J.  Arthur  Thomson,  The  System  of  Animate  Nature  (New  York,  1920),  pp.  8-9. 
See  also  Karl  Pearson,  The  Grammar  0}  Science  (2d  ed.;  London,  1900),  chap  iii, 
The  Scientific  Law. 


414  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

If  natural  law  aims  at  prediction  it  tells  us  what  we  can  do. 
Moral  laws,  on  the  other  hand,  tell  us,  not  what  we  can,  but  what 
we  ought  to  do.  The  civil  or  municipal  law,  finally,  tells  us  not 
what  we  can,  nor  what  we  ought,  but  what  we  must  do.  It  is  very- 
evident  that  these  three  types  of  law  may  be  very  intimately 
related.  We  do  not  know  what  we  ought  to  do  until  we  know 
what  we  can  do;  and  we  certainly  should  consider  what  men  can 
do  before  we  pass  laws  prescribing  what  they  must  do.  There  is, 
moreover,  no  likehhood  that  these  distinctions  will  ever  be  com- 
pletely abolished.  As  long  as  the  words  "can,"  "ought,"  and 
"must"  continue  to  have  any  meaning  for  us  the  distinctions  that 
they  represent  will  persist  in  science  as  well  as  in  common  sense. 

The  immense  prestige  which  the  methods  of  the  natural  sciences 
have  gained,  particularly  in  their  application  to  the  phenomena  of 
the  physical  universe,  has  undoubtedly  led  scientific  men  to  over- 
estimate the  importance  of  mere  conceptual  and  abstract  knowledge. 
It  has  led  them  to  assume  that  history  also  must  eventually  become 
"scientific"  in  the  sense  of  the  natural  sciences.  In  the  meantime 
the  vast  collections  of  historical  facts  which  the  industry  of  his- 
torical students  has  accumulated  are  regarded,  sometimes  even  by 
historians  themselves,  as  a  sort  of  raw  material,  the  value  of  which 
can  only  be  reahzed  after  it  has  been  worked  over  into  some  sort 
of  historical  generalization  which  has  the  general  character  of 
scientific  and,  ultimately,  mathematical  formula. 

"History,"  says  Karl  Pearson,  "can  never  become  science,  can 
never  be  anything  but  a  catalogue  of  facts  rehearsed  in  a  more  or 
less  pleasing  language  until  these  facts  are  seen  to  fall  into  sequences 
which  can  be  briefly  resumed  in  scientific  formulae."^  And  Henry 
Adams,  in  a  letter  to  the  American  Historical  Association  already 
referred  to,  confesses  that  history  has  thus  far  been  a  fruitless  quest 
for  "the  secret  which  would  transform  these  odds  and  ends  of 
philosophy  into  one  self-evident,  harmonious,  and  complete 
system." 

You  may  be  sure  that  four  out  of  five  serious  students  of  history  who 
are  living  today  have,  in  the  course  of  their  work,  felt  that  they  stood  on  the 
brink  of  a  great  generalization  that  would  reduce  all  history  under  a  law  as 

'  Karl  Pearson,  op.  cit.,  p.  359. 


SOCIOLOGY  AND  THE  SOCIAL  SCIENCES  415 

clear  as  the  laws  which  govern  the  material  world.  As  the  great  writers  of 
our  time  have  touched  one  by  one  the  separate  fragments  of  admitted  law 
by  which  society  betrays  its  character  as  a  subject  for  science,  not  one  of  them 
can  have  failed  to  feel  an  instant's  hope  that  he  might  find  the  secret  which 
would  transform  these  odds  and  ends  of  philosophy  into  one  self-evident, 
harmonious,  and  complete  system.  He  has  seemed  to  have  it,  as  the  Spanish 
say,  in  his  inkstand.  Scores  of  times  he  must  have  dropped  his  pen  to  think 
how  one  short  step,  one  sudden  inspiration,  would  show  all  human  knowledge; 
how,  in  these  thickset  forests  of  history,  one  corner  turned,  one  faint  trail 
struck,  would  bring  him  on  the  highroad  of  science.  Every  professor  who 
has  tried  to  teach  the  doubtful  facts  which  we  now  call  history  must  have 
felt  that  sooner  or  later  he  or  another  would  put  order  in  the  chaos  and  bring 
light  into  darkness.  Not  so  much  genius  or  favor  was  needed  as  patience 
and  good  luck.  The  law  was  certainly  there,  and  as  certainly  was  in  places 
actually  visible,  to  be  touched  and  handled,  as  though  it  were  a  law  of  chemistry 
or  physics.  No  teacher  with  a  spark  of  imagination  or  with  an  idea  of  scien- 
tific method  can  have  helped  dreaming  of  the  immortality  that  would  be 
achieved  by  the  man  who  should  successfully  apply  Darwin's  method  to 
the  facts  of  human  history.^ 

The  truth  is,  however,  that  the  concrete  facts,  in  which  history 
and  geography  have  sought  to  preserve  the  visible,  tangible,  and, 
generally  speaking,  the  experiential  aspects  of  human  Hfe  and  the 
visible  universe,  have  a  value  irrespective  of  any  generalization  or 
ideal  constructions  which  may  be  inferred  from  or  built  up  out  of 
them.  Just  as  none  of  the  investigations  or  generalizations  of 
individual  psychology  are  ever  Hkely  to  take  the  place  of  biography 
and  autobiography,  so  none  of  the  conceptions  of  an  abstract 
sociology,  no  scientific  descriptions  of  the  social  and  cultural  pro- 
cesses, and  no  laws  of  progress  are  likely,  in  the  near  future  at  any 
rate,  to  supersede  the  more  concrete  facts  of  history  in  which  are 
preserved  those  records  of  those  unique  and  never  fully  compre- 
hended aspects  of  Hfe  which  we  call  events. 

It  has  been  the  dream  of  philosophers  that  theoretical  and 
abstract  science  could  and  some  day  perhaps  would  succeed  in 
putting  into  formulae  and  into  general  terms  all  that  was  significant 
in  the  concrete  facts  of  life.  It  has  been  the  tragic  mistake  of  the 
so-called  intellectuals,  who  have  gained  their  knowledge  from  text- 
books rather  than  from  observation  and  research,  to  assume  that 

1  Henry  Adams,  op.  cit.,  p.  127. 


4i6  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

science  had  already  realized  its  dream.  But  there  is  no  indication 
that  science  has  begun  to  exhaust  the  sources  or  significance  of 
concrete  experience.  The  infinite  variety  of  external  nature  and 
the  inexhaustible  wealth  of  personal  experience  have  thus  far 
defied,  and  no  doubt  will  continue  to  defy,  the  industry  of  scientific 
classification,  while,  on  the  other  hand,  the  discoveries  of  science 
are  constantly  making  accessible  to  us  new  and  larger  areas  of 
experience. 

What  has  been  said  simply  serves  to  emphasize  the  instrumental 
character  of  the  abstract  sciences.  History  and  geography,  all  of 
the  concrete  sciences,  can  and  do  measurably  enlarge  our  experience 
of  life.  Their  very  purpose  is  to  arouse  new  interests  and  create 
new  sympathies;  to  give  mankind,  in  short,  an  environment  so 
vast  and  varied  as  will  call  out  and  activate  all  his  instincts  and 
capacities. 

The  more  abstract  sciences,  just  to  the  extent  which  they  are 
abstract  and  exact,  Hke  mathematics  and  logic,  are  merely  methods 
and  tools  for  converting  experience  into  knowledge  and  applying 
the  knowledge  so  gained  to  practical  uses. 

IV.      HISTORY,   NATURAL  HISTORY,   AND   SOCIOLOGY 

Although  it  is  possible  to  draw  clear  distinctions  in  theory  be- 
tween the  purpose  and  methods  of  history  and  sociology,  in  prac- 
tice the  two  forms  of  knowledge  pass  over  into  one  another  by 
almost  imperceptible  gradations. 

The  sociological  point  of  view  makes  its  appearance  in  historical 
investigation  as  soon  as  the  historian  turns  from  the  study  of 
"periods"  to  the  study  of  institutions.  The  history  of  institutions, 
that  is  to  say,  the  family,  the  church,  economic  institutions,  poUti- 
cal  institutions,  etc.,  leads  inevitably  to  comparison,  classification, 
the  formation  of  class  names  or  concepts,  and  eventually  to  the 
formulation  of  law.  In  the  process,  history  becomes  natural  his- 
tory, and  natural  history  passes  over  into  natural  science.  In 
short,  history  becomes  sociology. 

Westermarck's  History  of  Human  Marriage  is  one  of  the  earliest 
attempts  to  write  the  natural  history  of  a  social  institution.  It  is 
based  upon  a  comparison  and  classification  of  marriage  customs 


SOCIOLOGY  AND  THE  SOCIAL  SCIENCES  417 

of  widely  scattered  peoples,  living  under  varied  physical  and  social 
conditions.  What  one  gets  from  a  survey  of  this  kind  is  not  so 
much  history  as  a  study  of  human  behavior.  The  history  of 
marriage,  as  of  any  other  institution,  is,  in  other  words,  not  so 
much  an  account  of  what  certain  individuals  or  groups  of  individuals 
did  at  certain  times  and  certain  places,  as  it  is  a  description  of  the 
responses  of  few  fundamental  human  instincts  to  a  variety  of  social 
situations.     Westermarck  calls  this  kind  of  history  sociology.^ 

It  is  in  the  firm  conviction  that  the  history  of  human  civilization  should 
be  made  an  object  of  as  scientific  a  treatment  as  the  history  of  organic  nature 
that  I  write  this  book.  Like  the  phenomena  of  physical  and  psychical  life 
those  of  social  life  should  be  classified  into  certain  groups  and  each  group 
investigated  with  regard  to  its  origin  and  development.  Only  when  treated 
in  this  way  can  history  lay  claim  to  the  rank  and  honour  of  a  science  in  the 
highest  sense  of  the  term,  as  forming  an  important  part  of  Sociology,  the 
youngest  of  the  principal  branches  of  learning. 

Descriptive  historiography  has  no  higher  object  than  that  of  o£fering 
materials  to  this  science.* 

Westermarck  refers  to  the  facts  which  he  has  collected  in  his 
history  of  marriage  as  phenomena.  For  the  explanation  of  these 
phenomena,  however,  he  looks  to  the  more  abstract  sciences. 

The  causes  on  which  social  phenomena  are  dependent  fall  within  the 
domain  of  different  sciences — Biology,  Psychology,  or  Sociology.  The  reader 
will  find  that  I  put  particular  stress  upon  the  psychological  causes,  which 
have  often  been  deplorably  overlooked,  or  only  imperfectly  touched  upon. 
And  more  especially  do  I  believe  that  the  mere  instincts  have  played  a  very 
important  part  in  the  origin  of  social  institutions  and  rules.' 

1  Prof.  Robertson  Smith  {Nature,  XLIV,  270),  criticizing  Westermarck's  History 
of  Human  Marriage,  complains  that  the  author  has  confused  history  with  natural 
history.  "The  history  of  an  institution,"  he  writes,  "which  is  controlled  by  public 
opinion  and  regulated  by  law  is  not  natural  history.  The  true  history  of  marriage 
begins  where  the  natural  history  of  pairing  ends To  treat  these  topics  (poly- 
andry, kinship  through  the  female  only,  infanticide,  exogamy)  as  essentially  a  part  of 
the  natural  history  of  pairing  involves  a  tacit  assumption  that  the  laws  of  society  are 
at  bottom  mere  formulated  instincts,  and  this  assumption  really  underlies  all  our 
author's  theories.  His  fundamental  position  compels  him,  if  he  will  be  consistent 
with  himself,  to  hold  that  every  institution  connected  with  marriage  that  has  universal 
validity,  or  forms  an  integral  part  of  the  main  line  of  development,  is  rooted  in  instinct, 
and  that  institutions  which  are  not  based  on  instinct  are  necessarily  exceptional  and 
unimportant  for  scientific  historj'." 

'Edward  Westermarck,  TIte  History  of  Human  Marriage  (London,  1901),  p.  1. 

*  E.  Westermarck,  op.  cU.,  p.  5. 


4i8  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

Westermarck  derived  most  of  his  materials  for  the  study  of 
marriage  from  ethnological  materials.  Ethnologists,  students  of 
folklore  (German  Volkcrkunde),  and  archaeology  are  less  certain 
than  the  historians  of  institutions  whether  their  investigations  are 
historical  or  sociological. 

Jane  Harrison,  although  she  disclaims  the  title  of  sociologist, 
bases  her  conception  of  the  origin  of  Greek  religion  on  a  sociological 
theory,  the  theory  namely  that  "among  primitive  peoples  rehgion 
reflects  collective  feeling  and  collective  thinking."  Dionysius,  the 
god  of  the  Greek  mysteries,  is  according  to  her  interpretation  a 
product  of  the  group  consciousness. 

The  mystery-god  arises  out  of  those  instincts,  emotions,  desires  which 
attend  and  express  life;  but  these  emotions,  desires,  instincts,  in  so  far  as 
they  are  religious,  are  at  the  outset  rather  of  a  group  than  of  individual  con- 
sciousness  It  is  a  necessary  and  most  important  corollary   to   this 

doctrine,  that  the  form  taken  by  the  divinity  reflects  the  social  structure  of 
the  group  to  which  the  divinity  belongs.  Dionysius  is  the  Son  of  his  Mother 
because  he  issues  from  a  matrilinear  group. ^ 

This  whole  study  is,  in  fact,  merely  an  appHcation  of  Durk- 
heim's  conception  of  "collective  representations." 

Robert  H.  Lowie,  in  his  recent  volume.  Primitive  Society,  refers 
to  "ethnologists  and  other  historians,"  but  at  the  same  time  asks: 
"What  kind  of  an  historian  shall  the  ethnologist  be?" 

He  answers  the  question  by  saying  that,  "If  there  are  laws  of 
social  evolution,  he  [the  ethnologist]  must  assuredly  discover  them," 
but  at  any  rate,  and  first  of  all,  "his  duty  is  to  ascertain  the  course 

civilization  has  actually  followed To  strive  for  the  ideals 

of  another  branch  of  knowledge  may  be  positively  pernicious,  for 
it  can  easily  lead  to  that  factitious  simphfication  which  means 
falsification." 

In  other  words,  ethnology,  like  history,  seeks  to  tell  what 
actually  happened.  It  is  bound  to  avoid  abstraction,  "over- 
simplification," and  formulae,  and  these  are  the  ideals  of  another 
kind  of  scientific  procedure.  As  a  matter  of  fact,  however,  eth- 
nology, even  when  it  has  attempted  nothing  more  than  a  description 

1  Jane  Ellen  Harrison,  Themis,  A  Study  of  the  Social  Origins  of  Greek  Religion 
(Cambridge,  1912),  p.  ix. 


SOCIOLOGY  AND  THE  SOCIAL  SCIENCES  419 

of  the  existing  cultures  of  primitive  peoples,  their  present  distribu- 
tion and  the  order  of  their  succession,  has  not  freed  itself  wholly 
from  the  influence  of  abstract  considerations.  Theoretical  prob- 
lems inevitably  arise  for  the  solution  of  which  it  is  necessary  to  go 
to  psychology  and  sociology.  One  of  the  questions  that  has  arisen 
in  the  study,  particularly  the  comparative  study,  of  cultures  is: 
how  far  any  existing  cultural  trait  is  borrowed  and  how  far  it  is 
to  be  regarded  as  of  independent  origin. 

In  the  historical  reconstruction  of  culture  the  phenomena  of  distribution 
play,  indeed,  an  extraordinary  part.  If  a  trait  occurs  everywhere,  it  might 
veritably  be  the  product  of  some  universally  operative  social  law.  If  it  is 
found  in  a  restricted  number  of  cases,  it  may  still  have  evolved  through  some 
such  instrumentality  acting  under  specific  conditions  that  would  then  remain 
to  be  determined  by  analysis  of  the  cultures  in  which  the  feature  is  embedded. 
....  Finally,  the  sharers  of  a  cultural  trait  may  be  of  distinct  lineage  but 
through  contact  and  borrowing  have  come  to  hold  in  common  a  portion  of 
their  cultures 

Since,  as  a  matter  of  fact,  cultural  resemblances  aboimd  between  peoples 
of  diverse  stock,  their  interpretation  commonly  narrows  to  a  choice  between 
two  alternatives.  Either  they  are  due  to  like  causes,  whether  these  can  be 
determined  or  not;  or  they  are  the  result  of  borrowing.  A  predilection  for 
one  or  the  other  explanation  has  lain  at  the  bottom  of  much  ethnological 
discussion  in  the  past;  and  at  present  influential  schools  both  in  England  and 
in  continental  Europe  clamorously  insist  that  all  cultural  parallels  are  due 
to  diffusion  from  a  single  center.  It  is  inevitable  to  envisage  this  moot- 
problem  at  the  start,  since  uncompromising  championship  of  either  alternative 
has  far-reaching  practical  consequences.  For  if  every  parallel  is  due  to  bor- 
rowing, then  sociological  laws,  which  can  be  inferred  only  from  independently 
developing  likenesses,  are  barred.  Then  the  history  of  religion  or  social  life 
or  technology  consists  exclusively  in  a  statement  of  the  place  of  origin  of 
beliefs,  customs  and  implements,  and  a  recital  of  their  travels  to  different 
parts  of  the  globe.  On  the  other  hand,  if  borrowing  covers  only  part  of  the 
observed  parallels,  an  explanation  from  like  causes  becomes  at  least  the  ideal 
goal  in  an  investigation  of  the  remainder.  ^ 

An  illustration  will  exhibit  the  manner  in  which  problems 
originally  historical  become  psychological  and  sociological.  Tyler 
in  his  Early  History  of  Mankind  has  pointed  out  that  the  bellows 
used  by  the  negro  blacksmiths  of  continental  Africa  are  of  a  quite 
different  type  from  those  used  by  natives  of  Madagascar.     The 

'  Robert  H.  Lowic,  Primitive  Society  (New  York,  1920),  pp.  7-8. 


420  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

bellows  used  by  the  Madagascar  blacksmiths,  on  the  other  hand, 
are  exactly  like  those  in  use  by  the  Malays  of  Sumatra  and  in 
other  parts  of  the  Malay  Archipelago.  This  indication  that  the 
natives  of  Madagascar  are  of  Malay  origin  is  in  accordance  with 
other  anthropological  and  ethnological  data  in  regard  to  these 
peoples,  which  prove  the  fact,  now  well  estabhshed,  that  they  are 
not  of  African  origin. 

Similarly  Boas'  study  of  the  Raven  cycle  of  American  Indian 
mythology  indicated  that  these  stories  originated  in  the  northern 
part  of  British  Columbia  and  traveled  southward  along  the  coast. 
One  of  the  evidences  of  the  direction  of  this  progress  is  the  gradual 
diminution  of  complexity  in  the  stories  as  they  traveled  into 
regions  farther  removed  from  the  point  of  origin. 

All  this,  in  so  far  as  it  seeks  to  determine  the  point  of  origin, 
direction,  speed,  and  character  of  changes  that  take  place  in  cul- 
tural materials  in  the  process  of  diffusion,  is  clearly  history  and 
ethnology. 

Other  questions,  however,  force  themselves  inevitably  upon  the 
attention  of  the  inquiring  student.  Why  is  it  that  certain  cultural 
materials  are  more  widely  and  more  rapidly  diffused  than  others? 
Under  what  conditions  does  this  diffusion  take  place  and  why  does 
it  take  place  at  all?  Finally,  what  is  the  ultimate  source  of  cus- 
toms, beHefs,  languages,  religious  practices,  and  all  the  varied  tech- 
nical devices  which  compose  the  cultures  of  different  peoples? 
What  are  the  circumstances  and  what  are  the  processes  by  which 
cultural  traits  are  independently  created?  Under  what  condi- 
tions do  cultural  fusions  take  place  and  what  is  the  nature  of  this 
process? 

These  are  all  fundamentally  problems  of  human  nature,  and  as 
human  nature  itself  is  now  regarded  as  a  product  of  social  inter- 
course, they  are  problems  of  sociology. 

The  cultural  processes  by  which  languages,  myth,  and  reUgion 
have  come  into  existence  among  primitive  peoples  has  given  rise  in 
Germany  to  a  special  science.  Folk-psychology  {Volkerpsycholo- 
gie)  had  its  origin  in  an  attempt  to  answer  in  psychological  terms 
the  problems  to  which  a  comparative  study  of  cultural  materials 
has  given  rise. 


SOCIOLOGY  AND  THE  SOCIAL  SCIENCES  421 

From  two  different  directions  ideas  of  folk-psychology  have  found  their 
way  into  modern  science.  First  of  all  there  was  a  demand  from  the  different 
social  sciences  [Geistcswisse?ischaften]  for  a  psychological  explanation  of  the 
phenomena  of  social  life  and  history,  so  far  as  they  were  products  of  social 
[geisliger]  interaction.  In  the  second  place,  psychology  itself  required,  in  order 
to  escape  the  uncertainties  and  ambiguities  of  pure  introspection,  a  body  of 
objective  materials. 

Among  the  social  sciences  the  need  for  psychological  interpretation  first 
manifested  itself  in  the  studies  of  language  and  mythology.  Both  of  these 
had  already  found  outside  the  circle  of  the  philological  studies  independent 
fields  of  investigation.  As  soon  as  they  assumed  the  character  of  comparative 
sciences  it  was  inevitable  that  they  should  be  driven  to  recognize  that  in 
addition  to  the  historical  conditions,  which  everjrwhere  determines  the  concrete 
form  of  these  phenomena,  there  had  been  certain  fundamental  psychical  forces 
at  work  in  the  development  of  language  and  myth.^ 

The  aim  of  folk-psychology  has  been,  on  the  whole,  to  explain 
the  genesis  and  development  of  certain  cultural  forms,  i.e.,  lan- 
guage, myth,  and  reHgion.  The  whole  matter  may,  however,  be 
regarded  from  a  quite  different  point  of  view.  Gabriel  Tarde,  for 
example,  has  sought  to  explain,  not  the  genesis,  but  the  transmission 
and  diffusion  of  these  same  cultural  forms.  For  Tarde,  communi- 
cation (transmission  of  cultural  forms  and  traits)  is  the  one  central 
and  significant  fact  of  social  hfe.  "Social"  is  just  what  can  be 
transmitted  by  imitation.  Social  groups  are  merely  the  centers 
from  which  new  ideas  and  inventions  are  transmitted.  Imitation 
is  the  social  process. 

There  is  not  a  word  that  you  say,  which  is  not  the  reproduction,  now  un- 
conscious, but  formerly  conscious  and  voluntary,  of  verbal  articulations  reach- 
ing back  to  the  most  distant  past,  with  some  special  accent  due  to  your  imme- 
diate surroundings.  There  is  not  a  religious  rite  that  you  ful&l,  such  as  praying, 
kissing  the  icon,  or  making  the  sign  of  the  cross,  which  does  not  reproduce 
certain  traditional  gestures  and  expressions,  established  through  imitation  of 
your  ancestors.  There  is  not  a  miUtary  or  civil  requirement  that  you  obey, 
nor  an  act  that  you  perform  in  your  business,  which  has  not  been  taught  you, 
and  which  you  have  not  copied  from  some  living  model.  There  is  not  a  stroke 
of  the  brush  that  you  make,  if  you  are  a  painter,  nor  a  verse  that  you  write, 

1  Wilhelm  Wundt,  Volkerpsychologie,  eine  Unlerstichiing  der  Entwicklnngsgeselze 
von  Sprache,  Mythus  und  Sitte.  Erster  Band,  Die  Sprache,  Erster  Theii  (Leipzig, 
1900),  p.  13.  The  name  folk-psychology  was  first  used  by  Lazarus  and  Steinthal, 
Zeitschrift  fUr  Volkerpsychologie  und  S prachwissenschaft,  I,  1860.  Wundt's  folk- 
psychology  is  a  continuation  of  the  tradition  of  these  earlier  writers. 


422  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

if  you  are  a  poet,  which  does  not  conform  to  the  customs  or  the  prosody  of  your 
school,  and  even  your  very  originality  itself  is  made  up  of  accumulated  common- 
places, and  aspires  to  become  common-place  in  its  turn. 

Thus,  the  unvarj'ing  characteristic  of  every  social  fact  whatsoever  is  that 
it  is  imitative.    And  this  characteristic  belongs  exclusively  to  social  facts. ^ 

Tarde's  theory  of  transmission  by  imitation  may  be  regarded, 
in  some  sense,  as  complementary,  if  not  supplementary,  to  Wundt's 
theory  of  origins,  since  he  puts  the  emphasis  on  the  fact  of  trans- 
mission rather  than  upon  genesis.  In  a  paper,  "Tendencies  in 
Comparative  Philology,"  read  at  the  Congress  of  Arts  and  Sciences 
at  the  St.  Louis  Exposition  in  1904,  Professor  Hanns  Oertel,  of 
Yale  University,  refers  to  Tarde's  theory  of  imitation  as  an  alter- 
native explanation  to  that  offered  by  Wundt  for  "the  striking 
uniformity  of  sound  changes"  w^hich  students  of  language  have 
discovered  in  the  course  of  their  investigation  of  phonetic  changes 
in  widely  different  forms  of  speech. 

It  seems  hard  to  maintain  that  the  change  in  a  syntactical  construction 
or  in  the  meaning  of  a  word  owes  its  universality  to  a  simultaneous  and  inde- 
pendent primary  change  in  all  the  members  of  a  speech-commimity.  By 
adopting  the  theory  of  imitative  spread,  all  linguistic  changes  may  be  viewed 
as  one  homogeneous  whole.  In  the  second  place,  the  latter  view  seems  to 
bring  linguistic  changes  into  line  with  the  other  social  changes,  such  as  modi- 
fications in  institutions,  beliefs,  and  customs.  For  is  it  not  an  essential  char- 
acteristic of  a  social  group  that  its  members  are  not  co-operative  in  the  sense 
that  each  member  actively  participates  in  the  production  of  every  single  ele- 
ment which  goes  to  make  up  either  language,  or  belief,  or  customs?  Distin- 
guishing thus  between  primary  and  secondary  changes  and  between  the  origin 
of  a  change  and  its  spread,  it  behooves  us  to  examine  carefully  into  the  causes 
which  make  the  members  of  a  social  unit,  either  consciously  or  unconsciously, 
willing  to  accept  an  innovation.  What  is  it  that  determines  acceptance  or 
rejection  of  a  particular  change?  What  limits  one  change  to  a  small  area, 
while  it  extends  the  area  of  another?  Before  a  final  decision  can  be  reached  in 
favor  of  the  second  theory  of  imitative  spread  it  will  be  necessary  to  follow  out 
in  minute  detail  the  mechanism  of  this  process  in  a  number  of  concrete  in- 
stances; in  other  words  to  fill  out  the  picture  of  which  Tarde  {Les  lots  de 
rimitalion)  sketched  the  bare  outlines.  If  his  assumptions  prove  true,  then 
we  should  have  here  a  uniformity  resting  upon  other  causes  than  the  physical 
uniformity  that  appears  in  the  objects  with  which  the  natural  sciences  deal. 

•  G.  Tarde,  Social  Laws,  An  Outline  of  Sociology,  translated  from  the  French  by 
Howard  C.  Warren  (New  York,  1899),  pp.  40-41. 


SOCIOLOGY  AND  THE  SOCIAL  SCIENCES  423 

It  would  enable  us  to  establish  a  second  group  of  uniform  phenomena  which 
is  psycho-physical  in  its  character  and  rests  upon  the  basis  of  social  suggestion. 
The  uniformities  in  speech,  belief,  and  institutions  would  belong  to  this  second 
group.* 

What  is  true  of  the  comparative  study  of  languages  is  true  in 
every  other  field  in  which  a  comparative  study  of  cultural  materials 
has  been  made.  As  soon  as  these  materials  are  studied  from  the 
point  of  view  of  their  similarities  rather  than  from  the  point  of  view 
of  their  historical  connections,  problems  arise  which  can  only  be 
explained  by  the  more  abstract  sciences  of  psychology  or  sociology. 
Freeman  begins  his  lectures  on  Comparative  Politics  with  the  state- 
ment that 

the  comparative  method  of  study  has  been  the  greatest  intellectual  achievement 
of  our  time.  It  has  carried  light  and  order  into  whole  branches  of  human 
knowledge  which  before  were  shrouded  in  darkxiess  and  confusion.  It  has 
brought  a  line  of  argiunent  which  reaches  moral  certainty  into  a  region  which 
before  was  given  over  to  random  guess-work.  Into  matters  which  are  for  the 
most  part  incapable  of  strictly  external  proof  it  has  brought  a  form  of  strictly 
internal  proof  which  is  more  convincing,  more  unerring. 

Wherever  the  historian  supplements  external  by  internal  proof, 
he  is  in  a  way  to  substitute  a  sociological  explanation  for  historical 
interpretation.  It  is  the  very  essence  of  the  sociological  method  to 
be  comparative.  When,  therefore,  Freeman  uses,  in  speaking  of 
comparative  politics,  the  following  language  he  is  speaking  in 
sociological  rather  than  historical  terms: 

For  the  purposes  then  of  the  study  of  Comparative  Politics,  a  political 
constitution  is  a  specimen  to  be  studied,  classified,  and  labelled,  as  a  building 
or  an  animal  is  studied,  classified,  and  labelled  by  those  to  whom  building  or 
animals  are  objects  of  study.  We  have  to  note  the  likenesses,  striking  and 
unexpected  as  those  likenesses  often  are,  between  the  political  constitutions 
of  remote  times  and  places;  and  we  have,  as  far  as  we  can,  to  classify  our 
specimens  according  to  the  probable  causes  of  those  likenesses.^ 

Historically  sociology  has  had  its  origin  in  history.  It  owes  its 
existence  as  a  science  to  the  attempt  to  apply  exact  methods  to  the 

»Hanns  Oertel,  "Some  Present  Problems  and  Tendencies  in  Comparative  Phi- 
lology," Congress  of  Arts  and  Sciences,  Universal  Exposition,  St.  Louis,  1904  (Boston, 
1906),  III,  59. 

^  Edward  A.  Freeman,  Comparative  Politics  with  the  Unity  oj  History  (London, 
1873),  p.  23. 


424  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

explanation  of  historical  facts.  In  the  attempt  to  achieve  this, 
however,  it  has  become  something  quite  different  from  history.  It 
has  become  Uke  psychology  with  which  it  is  most  intimately  related, 
a  natural  and  relatively  abstract  science,  and  auxiliary  to  the 
study  of  history,  but  not  a  substitute  for  it.  The  whole  matter  may 
be  summed  up  in  this  general  statement:  history  interprets, 
natural  science  explains.  It  is  upon  the  interpretation  of  the  facts 
of  experience  that  we  formulate  our  creeds  and  found  our  faiths. 
Our  explanations  of  phenomena,  on  the  other  hand,  are  the  basis 
for  technique  and  practical  devices  for  controlhng  nature  and  human 
nature,  man  and  the  physical  world. 


THE  COMPARATIVE  ROLE  OF  THE   GROUP    CONCEPT 
IN  WARD'S  DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY  AND  CONTEM- 
PORARY AMERICAN  SOCIOLOGY 


WALTER  B.  BODENHAFER 

Washington  University 


III.      THE  GROUP  CONCEPT  AS  USED   BY  SOME  CONTEMPORARY 
SOCIOLOGISTS 

This  chapter  will  endeavor  to  present  the  uses  of  the  group 
concept  as  they  are  displayed  by  some  scholars  who  have  become 
distinguished  as  writers  of  sociology  in  America.  The  sociological 
field  is  too  wide  for  any  pretense  of  giving  attention  to  all  to  whom 
reference  might  be  made.  The  selection  is  purely  arbitrary  and 
personal,  but  the  reviews  presented  are  fairly  representative  of 
different  standpoints.  The  rule  has  been  adhered  to  of  selecting 
for  extended  discussion  only  those  who  have  become  known  as 
sociologists,  and  who  have  definitely  been  aligned  with  that  division 
of  labor.^  This  does  violence,  in  particular,  to  one  group  of  social 
scientists  which  has  been  particularly  prominent  in  developing  the 
view  which  is  set  forth  throughout  the  paper.  That  group  is  the 
social  psychologists,  such  as  Baldwin,  Mead,  and  others  who  have 
performed  an  indispensable  work  in  changing  the  whole  bent  of 
thought  in  social  science.  In  this  case  also  the  selection  is  arbitrary, 
and  has  no  justification  except  the  limitations  of  space  and  the 
recognition  of  a  division  of  labor.  No  effort  will  be  made  to  review 
the  whole  system  of  sociology  that  might  be  found  in  all  the  writings 
of  a  given  author,  but  only  those  selections  will  be  made  which  seem 
to  be  appropriate  for  the  purpose  in  hand.  A  steady  effort  will 
be  made  to  adopt  a  policy  of  liberal  rather  than  strict  construction 
in  all  cases.  The  order  in  which  the  reviews  come  is  partly  chrono- 
logical and  partly  that  of  the  importance  which  is  given  to  the 
use  of  the  group  concept. 

'  One  exception  is  mentioned  later. 

42s 


426  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

As  a  point  of  departure  for  the  consideration  of  Giddings'  use 
of  the  group  concept,  it  will  be  well  to  give  his  conception  of  his 
task  as  a  sociologist.  He  believes  the  purpose  of  sociology  to  be 
that  of  conceiving  society  in  its  unity  and  attempting  to  explain 
it  in  terms  of  cosmic  cause  and  law.'  In  order  to  accompHsh  its 
purpose  it  seeks  to  work  out  a  subjective  explanation  in  terms  of 
some  fact  of  consciousness  or  motive,  and  an  objective  interpreta- 
tion in  terms  of  a  physical  process.  This  does  not  mean  a  philo- 
sophical dualism,  but  two  ways  of  viewing  reality.^  The  central 
fact  of  motive  or  consciousness  is,  of  course,  the  consciousness  of 
kind.     Around  this  the  whole  subjective  explanation  revolves: 

Accordingly,  the  sociologist  has  three  main  quests.  First,  he  must  try 
to  discover  the  conditions  that  determine  aggregation  and  concourse.  Sec- 
ondly, he  must  try  to  discover  the  law  that  governs  social  choices,  the  law  that 
is  of  the  subjective  process.  Thirdly,  he  must  try  to  discover  also  the  law 
that  governs  the  natural  selection  and  the  survival  of  choices,  the  law  that  is 
of  the  objective  process.^ 

With  this  brief  summary  of  the  general  point  of  view  and  pur- 
pose of  sociology  we  may  consider  in  further  detail  how  far  Giddings 
makes  use  of  the  group  in  gaining  the  ends  he  has  devined  for  his 
subject.  In  setting  out  upon  the  descriptive  analysis  of  society, 
one  must  begin  with  the  study  of  population,  since  the  physical 
population  is  the  basis  for  all  society.  In  such  a  study  the  first 
fact  to  claim  attention  is  the  fact  of  aggregation  or  grouping.  In 
other  words,  the  group  is  assumed  as  the  starting  point  for  any 
study  whatever.  "  Some  degree  of  aggregation  is  the  indispensable 
condition  to  the  evolution  of  society."  As  will  be  shown  later  on  in 
the  review,  this  position  is  carried  through  the  whole  sociological 
discussion  which  occupies  our  attention.  The  importance  of  the 
group  factor,  as  the  initial  condition  of  the  explanation  of  all  origins, 
will  appear  more  clearly  when  we  come  to  the  study  of  the  origin 
and  evolution  of  society.  In  support  of  his  contention  the  author 
cites  examples  of  group  life  among  animals  and  the  fact  that  human 

'  Principles  of  Sociology,  p.  i6. 

'  Ibid.  Giddings  expressly  disclaims  any  dualistic  conception  by  his  use  of 
these  two  interpretations,  but  passages  throughout  tlie  book  seem  to  indicate  that  he 
does  not  escape  a  psychological  dualism  as  will  be  suggested  later  on. 

J  Ibid.,  p.  20. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"    427 

beings  are  always  found  in  groups.  "The  conception  of  nature  as 
'red  in  tooth  and  claw'  is  very  dear  to  moralists  and  politicians, 
but,  unhappily,  moralists  and  pohticians  do  not  know  nature  inti- 
mately. A  world  of  living  creatures  that  fear  and  hate,  shun  and 
attack  one  another  without  restraint,  is  not  a  fact  of  observation. 
It  is  a  pure  a  priori  creation  of  the  'pure'  reason."* 

The  term  aggregation  as  used  has  a  special  meaning  which  is 
intended  to  distinguish  it  from  association.  Aggregation  is  the 
physical  foundation  of  society.  It  is  the  mere  physical  concourse 
of  propinquity.  Association,  on  the  other  hand,  has  reference  to 
the  psychic  process  which  begins  in  simple  phases  of  feeling  and 
perception,  and  develops  into  activities  that  ultimately  call  forth 
the  highest  powers  of  the  mind.  Aggregation  is  always  supple- 
mented by  association  if  the  assembled  individuals  are  not  too 
unlike.*  While  one  might  easily  question  whether  any  forms  of 
higher  animals  or  the  ancestors  of  man  ever  represent  mere  aggre- 
gation as  thus  defined,  yet  the  fact  that  is  being  emphasized  by 
Giddings  is  sound,  namely,  that  the  first  assumption  from  which 
a  sociological  study  must  start  is  the  group,  that  is  forms  of  life  in 
some  sort  of  "  togetherness."  Some  of  the  discussion  of  the  process 
of  aggregation  seems  to  lay  him  open  to  the  charge  of  having  after 
all  to  desert  his  social  hypothesis  and  proceed  to  aggregate  or  gather 
together  his  individuals,  but  a  careful  reading  of  the  whole  book 
with  this  query  in  mind  must  acquit  him  of  the  charge.  The 
emphasis  is  on  the  fact  of  being  in  a  group  rather  than  on  the  active 
stage  of  aggregation.  The  choice  of  terms  is  a  bad  one  on  account 
of  the  active  connotation  to  which  the  term  "aggregation"  so  easily 
lends  itself.  Giddings  starts  with  an  association  or  group,  and  does 
not  conceive  of  the  individuals  as  coming  together  out  of  nothingness 
with  varying  degrees  of  isolated  evolution. 

All  human  beings,  from  the  lowest  savages  to  civilized  men,  live 
in  family  groups.^  These  family  groups  range  in  size  from  the 
simplest  family  unions  up  to  the  larger  groups  found  among  polyga- 
mous peoples.  Himian  societies  are  composed  of  famihes  which  are 
combined  to  form  larger  aggregates.  These  aggregates  are  of  two 
types,  the  ethnical  and  the  demotic.    Ethnical  societies  are  genetic 

'  Ibid.,  p.  79.  '  Ibid.,  p.  100.  i  Ibid.,  p.  155. 


428  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

aggregations  in  which  the  chief  bond  is  blood-kinship.  Demotic 
societies,  on  the  other  hand,  are  those  associations  which  are  bound 
together  by  habitual  intercourse,  mutual  interests,  and  co-operation, 
with  httle  or  no  regard  to  origins  or  genetic  relations/  The  demotic 
society  is  the  later  development,  although  the  family  group  is  found 
in  it  as  well  as  in  the  ethnic  type.  A  more  detailed  consideration 
of  Giddings'  development  of  the  nature  and  formation  of  these 
two  types  of  societies  will  bring  out  in  a  number  of  ways  the  part 
which  the  group  plays  in  his  thinking. 

Ethnic  societies  are  divided  into  three  great  classes  according 
to  the  degree  of  development  they  have  reached.  The  first  class 
•  is  the  horde  which  is  composed  of  a  few  famihes,  usually  not  more 
than  a  hundred  persons  in  all.  These  small  groups  are  not  found 
permanently  isolated  from  other  similar  groups,  consequently  there 
results  not  only  an  internal  group  life,  but  also  an  intergroup  com- 
munication. They  do  not  permanently  combine,  however,  so  as 
to  become  a  single  group.  The  next  larger  group  is  the  tribe, 
which  is  an  aggregate  of  several  hordes  or  a  differentiated  horde 
which  has  become  very  large.  Such  groups  have  one  language, 
occupy  one  territory,  and  are  pretty  thoroughly  organized  unities. 
The  third  class  of  ethnic  societies  is  the  still  larger  group  which  is 
a  confederation  of  tribes  into  an  ethnic  nation  or  a  folk.  Such 
groups  have  not  yet  developed  along  commercial,  industrial,  or 
intellectual  lines  to  a  degree  sufiQcient  to  make  them  into  the  modern 
states.^  Whatever  the  class  of  ethnic  society,  it  may  be  organized 
on  either  the  metronymic  or  patronymic  basis.  It  will  be  seen 
from  the  above  summary  of  Giddings'  discussion  of  the  primitive 
forms  of  human  life  that  some  kind  of  group  life  is  alwa}'s  in  evi- 
dence. Whatever  the  size  or  form  of  the  life  may  be,  there  is  the 
constant  factor  of  the  group  which  makes  possible  a  more  or  less 
active  social  life. 

As  before  indicated,  the  demotic  societies  are  defined  as  being 
those  which  have  attained  a  civil  basis;  the  blood  bond  has  largely 
disappeared.  In  this  class  are  found  all  the  more  highly  developed 
states,  including  the  present  civilized  nations.  The  latter  represent 
a  higher  type  of  social  evolution.    The  family,  however,  remains 

'  Principles  of  Sociology,  p.  157.  '  Ibid.,  pp.  157-58. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"    429 

the  unitary  group.  Families  are  combined  into  neighborhoods, 
hamlets,  villages ;  the  latter  compose  the  town  and  so  on  up  to  the 
highest  unit,  the  state.'  From  the  lowest  to  the  highest  type  of 
organization  in  groups,  the  central  subjective  factor  is  the 
consciousness  of  kind. 

The  organization  of  the  different  members  of  society  into  vol- 
untary groups  for  specified  ends  is  what  is  called  the  constitution 
of  a  society.  These  voluntary  organizations  are  on  the  basis  of 
the  consciousness  of  kind,  that  is,  those  that  are  in  sympathetic 
agreement  as  to  the  purposes  of  the  organization.  Those  that  are 
not  of  "kind"  are  generally  refused  entrance  to  the  special  group. 
These  voluntary  organizations  are  numerous,  and  increase  with 
the  development  of  society.  The  most  important  of  all  voluntary 
organizations  are  the  political  organizations.  In  addition  to  the 
pohtical  are  the  religious  organizations,  secret  societies,  cultural 
groups,  labor  organizations,  in  fact,  all  voluntary  groupings  which 
are  found  to  exist  in  contemporary  society.  Giddings  does  not 
adequately  explain  the  significance  of  these  groups  in  the  life  of 
the  individual  nor  attempt  to  explain  the  processes  by  which  the 
relation  of  the  individual  to  the  group  becomes  so  important.  He 
does  not  possess  the  means  to  do  this,  and  relies  on  the  principle  of 
the  consciousness  of  kind  for  whatever  explanation  is  given.  In 
other  words,  he  has  no  social  psychology  to  interpret  the  significance 
of  the  situation  he  describes.  In  spite  of  these  limitations,  however, 
it  is  of  interest  to  this  investigation  to  note  the  degree  to  which 
emphasis  is  placed  on  the  presence  of  numerous  groups  in  the 
actual  life  of  society.  The  importance  of  the  groups  is  implied, 
but  the  details  of  the  way  in  which  the  groups,  particularly  the 
"  primary  groups,"  are  so  important  in  the  creation  of  the  individual, 
are  lacking.  It  remained  for  later  sociological  thought  to  bring 
out  this  point  more  explicitly.  The  fact  of  the  group,  however, 
as  a  central  fact  in  human  society  is  consistently  kept  in  view 
in  the  discussion  with  which  we  are  dealing. 

Thus  far  the  discussion  has  largely  concerned  existing  societies, 
primitive  and  civilized.  In  order  to  show  up  more  clearly  the 
extent  to  which  the  group  concept  plays  a  part  in  Giddings'  thought, 

•  Ibid.,  pp.  168  flf. 


430  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

it  will  be  of  value  to  consider  that  part  of  his  sociology  which  has 
to  do  with  the  evolution  of  society.  The  development  of  society  is 
traced  through  four  stages  of  association:  zoogenic,  anthropogenic, 
ethnogenic,  and  demogenic.  We  shall  observe  the  same  order  in 
seeking  to  find  out  to  what  extent  he  has  used  the  group  as  a  factor 
in  the  evolutionary  process  which  he  attempts  to  follow. 

The  term  "zoogenic  association"  suggests  that  the  author  con- 
ceives association,  or  the  group  life,  to  have  been  a  factor  among  ani- 
mals and  the  precursors  of  man.  We  shall  try  to  point  out  the  wide 
use  which  is  made  of  this  conception  in  the  course  of  a  few  pages.  The 
principle  upon  which  he  proceeds  is  stated  in  this  manner:  "If 
animal  life  in  the  primeval  ages  was  not  wholly  different  from  the 
animal  life  now,  association  had  been  quietly  working  its  trans- 
forming results  for  millions  of  years  before  mankind  appeared  upon 
the  earth.  "^  In  other  words,  the  group  life  began  long  before  man 
appeared,  and  not  only  that,  it  had  also  been  a  vital  factor  in  pre- 
paring for  his  advent.  How  this  had  been  done  will  appear  as  we 
proceed  with  the  review.  First  of  all,  the  group  life  or  association 
had  certain  direct  effects  on  the  mental  life  of  the  associated  forms. ^ 

These  effects  were,  first,  an  original  development  of  native 
susceptibilities  and  powers,  such  as  susceptibilities  to  suggestion, 
capability  of  imitation,  antipathies,  sympathies,  power  of  discrimi- 
nation and  co-ordination;  secondly,  a  considerable  accumulation 
of  knowledge;  and  thirdly,  a  further  development  of  all  powers 
and  susceptibilities.  Association  thus  reacted  on  the  whole  organ- 
ism. It  gave  the  social  animal  an  advantage  in  securing  a  more 
adequate  food  supply,  afforded  a  wider  range  of  sexual  selection 
within  the  group,  and  gave  the  group  a  greater  advantage  in 
struggles  with  hostile  or  unfavorable  surrounding  flora  or  fauna. 

Giddings  carries  the  group  value  still  further  and  maintains 
that  the  group  has  been  a  factor  in  the  origin  of  species.  The 
extent  to  which  the  social  factor  is  carried  may  be  seen  from  the 
following  quotations:  "Association  was  one  of  the  great  co-operating 
causes  of  the  origin  of  species";''  "It  is  not  possible  to  doubt  that 

'  Principles,  p.  199;  Elements  of  Sociology,  p.  232. 
'  Elements  of  Sociology,  p.  237. 
^  Principles,  p.  202. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"    431 

for  thousands  of  years  before  man  existed,  natural  selection  was 
everywhere  supplemented  by  conscious  choice,  a  direct  product  of 
association";  "Association,  in  short,  was  a  chief  cause  of  variation 
and  of  characterization.  It  created  new  varieties,  and  in  them  it 
reproduced,  in  ever-increasing  strength,  the  instinct  to  associate."' 
In  commenting  upon  the  strictly  biological  approach  to  the  evo- 
lutionary problem  he  demands:  ''Is  there  not  a  fatal  lack  in  the 
biological  philosophy  that  ignores  the  social  factor  and  attempts 
to  account  for  variation  through  physiological  processes  only  ? 
Was  not  animal  intelligence  a  selective  agency  that  combined  and 
recombined  the  factors  of  evolution?  And  was  not  association  a 
factor  in  the  development  of  intelligence?""^  After  citing  many 
examples  from  Kropotkin  {Mutual  Aid),  he  resumes,  ''On  the  whole, 
we  may  accept  M.  Kropotkin's  conclusion  that  society  has  been  a 
more  powerful  aid  than  any  other  in  the  struggle  for  existence. 
But  it  has  been  so,  not  because  of  any  mysterious  power  in  itself, 
but  because  it  has  acted  directly  on  the  characters  of  the  associated 
individuals,  transforming  them  gradually,  and  by  degrees  develop- 
ing mental  power. "^  With  the  defects  in  the  analysis  made,  we 
are  not  concerned.  It  is  immaterial  for  our  purpose  whether,  from 
the  side  of  biology,  the  details  of  the  plan  are  sound  or  not.  What 
the  passages  do  show  is,  that  Giddings  had  in  mind  the  group  as  a 
very  important  factor  in  the  actual  life  of  the  animal  forms  and  of 
the  precursors  of  man,  and  that  the  group  played  a  very  important 
part,  not  only  in  the  development  of  the  subsequent  group  life, 
but  also  was  a  factor  in  the  development  of  the  individual  forms. 
The  whole  of  Giddings'  view  on  this  point  is  summarized  in  this  way : 

Thus  throughout  the  ages  before  man,  association  was  zoogenic.  It  was 
causing  variation  and  was  determining  survival.  It  was  differentiating 
animal  life  into  kinds,  and  was  bringing  to  a  high  state  of  perfection  the  kinds 
that  were  best  equipped  with  a  social  nature,  with  habits  of  mutual  aid,  and  with 
elementary  forms  of  social  organization.     In  achieving  all  this,  association 

was  preparing  the  way  for  man  and  for  human  society Thousands  of 

years,  perhaps  millions  of  years,  before  man  was  born,  the  foundations  of  his 
empire  were  being  laid  in  the  zoogenic  associations  of  the  humblest  forms  of 
conscious  life.< 

^  Ibid.,  p.  203.  ilbid.,  pp.  206-7. 

'Ibid.,  p.  201.  ^  Ibid.,  p.  207. 


432  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

In  other  words,  human  society  has  its  roots  in  the  group  life 
of  the  distant  past,  and  in  order  to  analyze  the  evolutionary  basis 
of  society  and  of  man,  one  must  have  recourse  to  the  fundamental 
fact  of  the  group. 

Under  the  term  anthropogenic  association,  Giddings  discusses 
the  fact  of  association  among  prehistoric  peoples  and  its  relation 
to  the  development  of  human  beings.  It  is  the  next  stage  above 
animal,  or  zoogenic,  association  described  above.  No  existing 
societies  can  be  found  which  are  in  this  stage,  but  there  are  enough 
similarities  revealed  by  the  study  of  primitive  tribes  to  suggest 
some  parallels.  These  are  supplemented  by  the  discoveries  of 
archaeologists  which  have  revealed  a  good  deal  of  the  nature  of 
prehistoric  life. 

In  this  type  of  association,  as  in  the  former,  the  group  plays  a 
central  part.  All  evidence  points  to  the  conclusion  that  the  pre- 
historic peoples  lived  in  groups,  as  did  their  animal  ancestors,  and 
as  do  their  descendants.  There  is  no  evidence  of  a  hiatus  of  a 
non-group  life  between  the  social  animals  and  social  man. 

All  the  remains  of  primitive  man  show  that  they  lived  as  savage  men  live, 
in  groups.  The  ape-like  ancestor  of  man  must  have  been  a  social  animal.  Is 
there  any  reason  to  suppose  that  between  the  social  anthropoid  and  the  social 
primitive  man  there  was  intercalated  a  pair  living  out  of  social  relations  and 
so  far  diflfering  mentally  and  physically  from  all  the  other  creatures  that  any 
society  with  them  was  impossible  ?  If  there  is,  it  would  be  just  as  well  to  go 
back  to  the  hypothesis  of  special  creation;  for  the  mental  and  physical  differ- 
ences that  mark  me  off  from  other  creatures  are  those  that  are  created  by  social 
intercourse,  and  without  society  they  could  not  have  had  a  natural  genesis.'' 

The  group,  then,  is  the  sine  qua  non  of  the  evolution  of  human 
society  and  man.  It  is  the  group  with  its  interrelations  that  has 
produced  those  qualities  which  distinguish  man  from  other  forms 
of  animal  life  and  has  given  him  his  pre-eminence.  "If  the 
conclusions  hitherto  reached  in  this  work  are  true,  it  is  necessary 
to  believe  that  association,  more  extended,  more  intimate,  more 
varied  in  its  phases,  than  the  association  practiced  by  inferior 
species,  was  the  chief  cause  of  the  mental  and  moral  development, 
and  of  the  anatomical  modifications  that  transformed  a  sub-human 
species  into  man."^ 

'  Principles,  p.  208.  '  Ibid.,  p.  221. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"    433 

In  his  analysis  of  the  nature,  origin,  and  function  of  language, 
Giddings  displays,  in  a  very  clear  fashion,  the  group  factor  as  a 
part  of  the  social  process  in  evolution.  Of  the  importance  of  speech 
in  the  development  of  society  and  of  human  beings  he  says :  "Speech 
is  the  specific  attainment  that  separates  man  from  the  brute  and  is 
the  means  to  the  development  of  his  higher  intellectual  qualities."^ 
As  will  be  shown  later,  this  peculiar  achievement  is  a  social  product, 
and  therefore  is  a  result  of  group  relations. 

Language  is  defined  broadly: 

Language,  the  system  of  signs  by  wliich  simple  ideas,  recepts,  and  concepts 
are  expressed,  may  consist  of  gestures,  grimaces  and  tones,  of  inarticulate 
utterances,  of  articulate  sounds,  or  of  articulate  sounds,  tones  and  gestures  in 
combination.  The  language  of  gesture  and  tone  is  the  language  of  recepts; 
It  is  weU  developed  among  animals  and  is  the  natural  language  of  children, 
mentally  deficient  adults  and  savages.  Articulation  is  a  secondary  language 
of  recepts  and  the  only  language  of  concepts.^ 

Giddings  adopts  Romanes'  classifications  of  the  signs  that  constitute 
language,  whether  such  signs  are  gestures,  tones,  or  articulate 
sounds,  namely:  (i)  indicative;  (2)  denotative;  (3)  connotative; 
(4)  denominative;  (5)  predicative.  These  represent  an  advancing 
gradation  from  the  simplest  expression  of  sensations  up  to  the 
expression  of  concepts.  Animals  cannot  ascend  above  the  third 
class  of  signs,  and  only  rarely  as  far  as  the  third.  The  fourth  and 
fifth  classes  of  signs  are  employed  only  by  man.  In  other  words, 
animals  below  man  have  language,  but  not  speech.^ 

The  "crucial  question  in  the  problem  of  the  origin  of  human 
faculty"  is,  How  was  the  transition  made  from  the  lower  type  of 
language  to  the  higher  type?  In  tr>'ing  to  answer  this  crucial 
question,  Giddings  follows  Donovan  in  looking  for  the  solution  in 
the  intimate  relation  between  speech,  on  the  one  hand,  and  ideation, 

I  Ibid.,  p.  209.  '  Ibid.,  p.  223. 

3  Giddings  properly  includes  gesture  as  the  beginning  of  language  of  the  higher 
type.  His  discussion  reveals  a  psychology  which  is  atomistic  and  indiWduahstic 
and  does  not  fit  in  with  his  group  hypothesis.  His  psychological  dualism  is  open  to 
criticism  from  several  points  of  view,  but  we  are  not  concerned  so  much  with  this 
defect  as  with  the  problem  of  finding  out  to  what  extent  he  makes  use  of  the  group 
factor  in  evolving  that  most  vital  factor  in  human  evolution,  language.  His  psychol- 
ogy is  inadequate  but  he  does  attempt  to  follow  out  the  social  hy-pothesis.  In  other 
words,  he  makes  bad  use  of  the  group  concept,  but  he  makes  the  attempt. 


434  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

with  choral  music,  on  the  other.  Under  the  stimulus  of  excitement 
which  occurs  at  festal  occasions  and  celebrations,  with  their  intense 
emotion,  social  interest,  and  rhythm,  "signs  were  first  distinguished 
in  thought  from  the  things  signified,  and  so  conventionalized  as 
names,  movable  types  of  speech."^  The  inadequacy  of  this  explana- 
tion of  the  problem  is  quite  apparent,  but  the  important  point 
to  be  noted  is  not  its  inadequacy  but  that  it  brings  in  the  essential 
fact  of  the  group,  and  the  emotional  tension  arising  in  group  life, 
as  the  starting-point  for  all  attempts  to  explain  the  problem  of  the 
origin  of  language  in  its  higher  forms.  It  was  the  group  which 
gave  the  human  being  a  language  which  enabled  him  to  lift  himself 
above  the  other  forms  of  life. 

The  effect  of  language  upon  the  nature  of  the  developing  forms 
was  to  develop  what  Giddings  calls  human  nature. 

From  the  moment  that  the  hominine  species  began  to  practice  speech, 
however  feebly,  however  awkwardly,  it  began  to  develop  a  human  nature. 
The  term  "human  nature"  has  so  long  been  associated  with  economic  motives 
and  with  individualism,  that  it  has  acquired  a  perverted  meaning.  Human 
nature  is  not  the  unsocial  egoistic  nature.  Self-interest  is  not  the  distinctively 
human  trait;  it  is  a  primordial  animal  trait,  which  man,  an  animal  after  all, 
still  possesses  and  must  cultivate  if  he  would  continue  to  live.  Human  nature 
is  the  pre-eminently  social  nature.* 

The  thought  contained  here  has  been  developed  by  other  sociolo- 
gists and  is  sound.^  Human  nature  is  a  group  product  and  is  essen- 
tially a  human  characteristic.  The  instincts  have  their  roots  in  the 
distant  past  of  the  physical  organism,  but  the  mind  or  self  is  created 
by  the  group  and  is  a  social  product;  it  is  human  nature. 

Giddings  criticizes  the  traditional  view  of  the  order  of  evolution 
as  being  unsound  in  that  it  reverses  the  true  order.  He  describes 
the  traditional  view  as  follows:  "In  the  conceptions  of  evolution 
that  became  current  after  the  publication  of  the  Descent  of  Man, 
the  development  of  man  was  pictured  as  beginning  in  a  physical 
transformation,  continuing  in  a  mental  and  moral  development, 
and  completing  itself  in  an  evolution  of  social  relations."''  Such  a 
view,  according  to  Giddings,  reverses  the  true  order  of  cause  and 

'  Principles,  p.  225.  '  Ibid. 

J  Cooley,   Social  Organization;    Park,   Principles   of  Human   Behavior;    Todd, 
Theories  of  Social  Progress;  et  al. 
*  Principles,  p.  228. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"    435 

effect.  **  Social  life  enlarged  and  stimulated  the  mental  life  until 
it  created  speech  and  conceptual  thought.  With  the  aid  of  speech 
and  conceptual  thought,  association  continued  to  develop  the 
mental  activity  at  an  ever-accelerating  rate  until  it  became  the 
supreme  activity  and  dominant  interest  of  man."^  By  reason  of 
the  fact  of  association  in  group  life  there  developed  language 
and  the  resulting  power  of  thought.  "To  create  the  human  mind 
was  the  great  work  of  anthropogenic  association."^ 

Enough  has  been  given  to  show  the  central  position  which  in  Gid- 
dings'  view  the  group  occupies  in  human  evolution.  As  has  been 
suggested,  there  is  an  absence  of  an  adequate  process  to  explain  the 
origin  of  speech  and  the  human  mind,  but  they  are  properly  considered 
as  results  of  a  group  mode  of  life  extending  back  into  the  dim  animal 
past.  Giddings'  psychological  point  of  view  is  that  of  an  intellectual- 
istic  dualist,  which,  from  the  standpoint  of  a  behaviorist  or  function- 
aHst,  is  open  to  serious  criticism,  but,  for  the  present,  that  is  outside 
the  purpose  of  this  review.  That  purpose  is  to  indicate  some  of  the 
ways  in  which  Giddings  used  the  group  as  a  fact  in  constructing 
his  sociology.     It  is  hoped  that  the  purpose  has  been  accomplished. 

Concerning  the  relation  of  the  individual  to  the  group  in 
present  societies,  Giddings  says:  "The  individual,  therefore,  is 
not  prior  to  society,  or  society  to  the  individual.  Community  is 
not  precedent  to  competition,  or  competition  to  community.  From 
the  first,  competition  and  community,  society  and  the  individual, 
have  been  co-ordinate.  Society  and  the  individual  have  always 
been  acting  and  reacting  upon  each  other.  "^  This  passage  suggests 
the  thesis  which  Cooley  followed, "*  and  which  expresses  the  starting- 
point  for  modern  social  psychology,  namely,  the  individual  and 
the  group  are  but  two  phases  of  the  larger  whole.  The  final  end 
of  the  whole  social  process  is  not,  however,  the  ultimate  exaltation 
of  the  group  at  the  expense  of  the  individual,  as  implied  by  Plato 
and  actually  carried  out  in  the  German  state,  but  rather  the  reverse : 
"The  function  of  society  is  to  develop  conscious  life  and  to  create 
human  personality.  "^ 

'  Ibid.,  p.  229.  *  Ibid.,  p.  255.  3  Ibid.,  p.  399. 

*  Human  Nature  and  the  Social  Order;  Social  Organization. 
'  Principles,  p.  420. 


436  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

Professor  Ross  has  made  his  particular  contribution  to  American 
sociology  in  the  field  of  what  he  has  defined  as  social  psychology 
and  its  subordinate  branch,  social  control.  This  investigation  will, 
therefore,  endeavor  to  find  in  his  writings  bearing  on  those  subjects 
to  what  extent  he  makes  use  of  the  group  as  a  tool  of  thought  in 
the  solution  of  the  problems  arising  in  those  fields.'  In  doing  so, 
we  shall  seek  out  those  phases  of  his  discussion  which  seem  to  bear 
upon  certain  points  that  may  be  of  aid,  rather  than  attempting 
to  give  a  resume  of  his  whole  sociological  contribution.  In  order 
to  derive  a  perspective  for  the  summary  it  will  be  well  to  present 
Ross's  conception  of  the  whole  sociological  field  and  of  the  particu- 
lar place  of  each  branch  in  the  whole  scheme. 

In  his  Foundations  of  Sociology  Ross  attempts  to  define  the 
scope  and  function  of  sociology  and  to  give  it  its  place  among  the 
social  sciences.  The  first  task  he  sets  himself  is  to  define  the 
subject-matter  of  the  science.  The  "social  organism"  will  not  do 
because,  look  where  we  will,  we  find  no  "social  body  complete  with 
head,  limbs,  periphery,  and  viscera."  The  study  of  the  relation 
between  groups,  and  between  the  group  and  the  individual,  is  not 
broad  enough  to  constitute  the  subject-matter  of  the  science, 
because  it  must  embrace  the  genesis  of  the  groups  and  there  are 
many  relations  between  individuals  that  do  not  involve  the  groups. 
If  we  turn  to  the  modes  or  forms  of  association  into  groups,  after 
Simmel's  notion,  we  have  only  one  of  the  provinces  of  sociology, 
namely  social  morphology.  Human  achievement,  which  was 
Ward's  subject-matter  for  the  science,  is  again  but  one  volume  of 
a  treatise  on  sociology.  Much  of  the  field  of  human  interaction 
is  not  embraced  within  the  subject  of  achievement.  Ross's  con- 
ception of  sociology  as  the  science  of  association  is  extended 
by  Ross  himself.  Sociologists  are  eager  to  investigate  the 
"springs  of  human  progress,"  to  find  the  causes  of  social  trans- 
formations, to  trace  the  influence  of  environment  on  humanity; 
but  these  do  not  belong  to  the  problem  of  association.  "  Social 
psychology,  social  morphology,  social  mechanics  ....  all  of  them 

'  This  summary  is  based  on  his  three  works,  Social  Control  (1901),  Foundations  of 
Sociology  (1905),  Social  Psychology  (1Q08).  His  subsequent  writings  do  not  indicate 
a  material  departure  from  the  views  elaborated  in  the  books  named,  and  for  the  purpose 
of  this  discussion  may  be  ignored. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"    437 

are,  it  seems  to  me, but  convenient  segments  of  a  science,  the  subject- 
matter  of  which  is  social  phenomena.  I  say  'phenomena'  in  prefer- 
ence to  '  activities,'  because  it  embraces  beliefs  and  feelings  as  well 
as  action.'"  In  defining  what  are  "social  phenomena,"  he  says: 
"All  phenomena  which  we  cannot  explain  without  bringing  in 
the  action  of  one  human  being  on  another.^ 

The  science  which  has  social  phenomena  for  its  subject-matter 
is  necessarily  the  master-science;  it  aspires  to  the  suzerainty  of 
the  special  social  sciences. ^  The  justification  for  such  a  claim  is 
found  in  the  interrelatedness  of  society. 

Although  there  are  several  facets  to  human  nature,  although  each  aspect 
of  social  life  has  some  sort  of  psychic  basis  of  its  own,  still,  the  deeper  we  pene- 
trate into  the  causes  of  human  affairs,  the  more  impressed  are  we  with  the 
cross  relations  between  social  phenomena  of  different  orders.'' 

....  The  fuller  our  knowledge,  the  more  impressed  we  are  with  the  rela- 
tivity of  each  class  of  social  phenomena  to  other  classes.  Society  no  longer 
falls  apart  into  neat  segments  like  a  peeled  orange.  State,  law,  religion,  art, 
morals,  industry,  instead  of  presenting  so  many  parallel  streams  of  development, 
are  studied  rather  as  different  aspects  of  one  social  evolution.^ 

Although  one  might  dissent  from  the  claim  for  sociology  inferred 
from  this  statement,  still  the  latter  indicates  a  clear  conception  of 
the  fact  that  human  life  is  a  social  process,  a  group,  and  that  the 
group  conception  must  be  held  in  mind  in  all  attempts  to  study 
this  thing  that  we  call  society  in  any  of  its  multifarious  forms. 
What  is  the  unit  of  investigation  with  which  sociology  has  to 
deal  ?  Is  it  the  group  ?  Is  it  the  individual  ?  Is  it  something  else  ? 
To  these  questions  Ross  returns  very  definite  answers.  There  is 
no  use  to  look  for  a  single  elementary  social  fact:  "When  the  assay 
is  completed,  at  the  bottom  of  the  crucible  will  probably  be  found 
several  ultimates."^  The  individual  must  be  rejected  as  the  unit 
because  that  is  the  unit  of  anthropology.  Furthermore,  only  the 
spiritual  part  of  man  is  molded  by  association,  and  not  everyone 
is  drawn  in  between  the  social  rollers. ^    The  functional  group  will 

^Foundations  of  Sociology,  p.  6.  *  Ibid.,  p.  12. 

^  Ibid.  i  Ibid.,  pp.  13-14. 

i  Ibid.,  pp.  8-9.  « Ibid.,  p.  85. 

''Ibid.  This  statement  is  very  significant  in  showing  the  individualistic  pre- 
conceptions underlying  his  analj'sis. 


438  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

not  do  for  the  social  unit;  since  many  groups  are  antagonistic  to 
society,  they  have  no  part  in  the  division  of  labor.  Groups  are 
temporary  and  shifting,  and  while  a  study  of  groups  and  group  rela- 
tions is  of  very  great  value,  it  is  not  the  unit  of  social  investigation. 
Nor  can  the  institution  be  considered  the  social  unit.  It  leaves 
out  of  account  those  social  relations  and  those  groupings  which 
are  temporary  and  do  not  become  institutions.  All  these  things 
are  products;  they  have  arisen  out  of  the  actions  and  interactions 
of  men.  To  understand  them,  "we  must  ascend  to  that 
primordial  fact  known  as  the  social  process."^  This  is  the  basic 
unit.     It  is  not  single,  however,  but  manifold,  social  processes. 

Leaving  the  larger  sociological  field,  it  is  of  value  to  place  in 
that  field  the  particular  subjects  of  study,  social  psychology  and 
social  control.  It  is  in  these  lines  that  Ross  shows  his  thinking 
most  clearly,  and  they  will,  therefore,  merit  closer  examination. 
Social  psychology,  as  Ross  conceives  it.  "studies  the  psychic  planes 
and  currents  that  come  into  existence  among  men  in  consequence 
of  their  association."^  It  has  to  do  with  psychic  uniformities, 
that  is,  with  uniformities  due  to  social  causes.  It  is  distinguished 
from  sociology  proper  in  that  the  latter  deals  with  groups  and  struc- 
tures. It  is  distinguished  from  psychological  sociology  by  the  fact 
that  it  omits  the  psychology  of  groups.^  The  problem  of  social  con- 
trol is  but  one  phase  of  social  psychology,  namely,  conscious  social 
ascendancy.''  These  differentiations  of  definition  are  necessary 
in  order  to  preserve  an  honest  criticism  of  Ross's  work,  and  enable 
us  to  escape  misinterpretation  of  varying  terminologies.  With 
this  introduction  we  pass  on  to  a  more  concrete  study  of  his  use 
of  the  group  concept  in  his  analysis.  In  doing  so  we  shall  take  up 
several  illustrative  problems  that  are  especially  fitted  to  display 
the  use  to  which  he  puts  such  a  conception,  and  the  failures  to  use 
it,  if  such  there  be. 

In  order  to  see  what  use  is  made  of  the  group  concept,  we  may 
examine  the  crucial  question  of  the  relation  of  the  individual  to 

'  Foundations  of  Sociology,  p.  91. 

'  Social  Psychology,  p.  i.  ^  Ibid.,  p.  2. 

*  Social  Control,  Preface,  p.  vii. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  ''DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"    439 

the  group,  as  Ross  sees  it.  With  reference  to  the  problem  of  order 
in  society,  Ross  says: 

I  began  the  work  six  years  ago  with  the  idea  that  nearly  all  the  goodness 
and  conscientiousness  by  which  a  social  group  is  enabled  to  hold  together  can 
be  traced  to  such  influences  [social  influences].  It  seemed  to  me  then  that 
the  individual  contributed  very  little  to  social  order,  while  society 
contributed  almost  everything.  Further  investigation,  however,  appears 
to  show  that  the  personality  freely  unfolding  under  conditions  of 
healthy  fellowship  may  arrive  at  a  goodness  all  its  own,  and  that  order  is 
explained  partly  by  this  streak  in  human  nature  and  partly  by  the  influence 
of  social  surroundings.' 

In  attempting  to  state  the  reciprocal  relation  between  the  individual 
and  the  group,  Ross  adopts  uncritically  the  thought  of  Baldwin :  "In 
other  words,  the  ego  and  the  alter  are  only  the  same  thought  with 
different  connotations.  I  use  the  same  notion  of  personality,  now 
in  thinking  of  ego,  now  in  thinking  of  alter.  HencC;  I  must  read 
into  the  other  person  the  same  desires  and  interests  I  feel  in  myself."^ 
Upon  this  basis  Ross  builds  his  conception  of  the  sense  of  justice 
as  one  of  the  agencies  of  control.  The  use  made  of  Baldwin's 
thought  in  a  few  such  discrete  passages  indicates  that  Ross  did 
not  grasp  the  significance  of  either  the  process  or  the  implications 
of  the  theory  which  Baldwin  was  trying  to  develop.  The  concep- 
tion of  the  self  and  the  alter  as  being  twin  phases  of  a  total  social 
situation,  which  is  the  basis  of  all  social  psychology,  was  never 
utilized  by  Ross.  His  references  in  such  statements  as  the  above 
were  merely  perfunctory.  They  do  show,  however,  a  reaching 
after  the  heart  of  the  social  process  and  a  consciousness  that  it  is 
in  the  group-individual  relation  that  a  sound  sociological  unit  must 
be  found.  Though  lacking  in  many  particulars,  the  writer  of 
Social  Control  was  getting  at  the  heart  of  the  sociological  problem ; 
it  was  an  attempt  to  interpret  the  process  and  signifi.cance  of  the 
relation  of  the  group  to  the  individual, in  so  far  as  the  social  influences 
mold  and  shape  the  individual  into  its  own  likeness.  Of  the  essen- 
tial part  of  the  group  in  the  formation  of  the  various  attitudes  of 
the  individual,  Ross  was  well  conscious.     Thus,  for  example: 

The  fact  is,  every  group  of  men  exhibits  a  morality  corresponding  to 
its  place  in  the  hierarchy  of  groups Many  nepotists,  sectaries,   and 

*  Ibid.,  Preface,  '  Ibid.,  p.  3. 


440  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

partisans  are  simply  victims  of  one  of  these  unscrupulous  group  moralities. 
Adherents  of  sects — anarchists,  Jesuits,  Jacobins,  emigres — are  induced  by 
the  sect  ego  to  commit  crimes  they  would  not  commit  for  themselves.' 

Again,  the  influence  of  smaller  groups  on  the  individuals  in  them 
is  powerful : 

Every  party,  labor  union,  guild,  lodge,  surveying  corps,  or  athletic  team  will, 
in  the  course  of  time,  develop  for  its  special  purposes  appropriate  types  of 
character  or  observance,  which  exert  on  its  members  an  individual  pressiure 
subordinating  them  to  the  welfare  or  aims  of  the  association.* 

These  quotations  indicate  the  place  which  Ross  gives  to  the  group 
in  the  influencing  of  the  actions  of  the  members  of  those  groups. 
He  does  not,  however,  grasp  fully  the  essentially  social  nature  of 
the  origin  of  moral  codes  and  moral  attitudes.  His  individual  is 
largely  given  and,  once  given,  the  group  has  a  powerful  effect  upon 
him.  He  does  not  utilize  adequately  the  place  of  the  group  in  the 
creation  of  moral  attitudes  arising  out  of  group  crises.  In  fact 
the  individual  is  the  source  of  all  ethical  improvements. 

Ross  does  not  enter  into  a  study  of  social  origins  to  any  length. 
He  takes  society  as  it  is  and  deals  with  the  problems  of  association  as 
he  finds  them.  Occasional  references,  however,  disclose  his  hypothe- 
sis as  to  some  of  the  problems  of  social  origins.  He  inclines  to 
adopt  the  view  of  Ward  and  Comte  that  the  altruistic  attitude 
is  relatively  a  late  development  in  social  evolution:  "In  the  light 
of  the  facts  collected  by  many  workers,  it  is  no  longer  difficult 
to  trace  the  slender  stem  of  altruism  rising  from  the  lower  levels 
of  mammalian  life  side  by  side  with  the  thicker  and  rougher  trunk 
of  egoism. "•*  To  bridge  the  chasm  he  exploits  the  role  of  sympathy. 
In  addition  to  sympathy  there  are  certain  gregarious  instincts  that 
facilitate  harmony  in  social  relations,  but 

we  do  not  yet  know  whether  our  simian  ancestor  was  most  akin  to  the  solitary 
ape,  or  to  the  sociable  chimpanzee,  but  it  is  safe  to  say  that  man  was  never  so 
thoroughly  sociable  as  the  horse,  the  prairie  dog,  or  the  grass-eating  animals 
generally.  With  even  the  best  of  strains  of  man,  the  gregarious  instincts  do 
not  seem  to  have  very  long  roots.     His  social  union  comes  late  and  is  not  easy 

to  maintain Those  enthusiasts,  then,  who  draw  charming  lessons  from 

the  study  of  gregarious  animals  and  of  social  insects  not  only  fail  to  give  us 

'  Social  Control,  p.  71. 

'  Ibid.,  p.  232.  3  Ihid.,  p.  7. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"    441 

the  clew  to  human  association,  but  are  very  apt  to  lead  us  quite  astray  as  to 
the  real  causes  of  social  order.^ 

Ross  recognizes,  however,  that  the  studies  of  anthropologists 
among  the  primitive  communities  that  exist  show  a  natural  com- 
munity life  with  a  relatively  peaceful  nature.  This  is  one  of  the 
paradoxes  of  anthropology."  How  this  paradox  is  to  be  reconciled 
with  his  theory  of  the  origin  of  altruism  and  social  impulses  is  not 
adequately  explained.  Since  primitive  times,  he  continues,  the 
present  civilized  peoples  have  gone  through  a  process  of  evolution 
which  destroyed  the  primitive  attitudes  of  sociability  and  replaced 
them  with  individualistic  ones.  Still  more  recently  there  is  a  rever- 
sion, through  the  selective  process,  to  the  more  sociable  type, 
resulting  from  the  disappearance  of  the  frontier  and  the  creation 
of  an  industrial  stable  life.  The  older  primitive  association  was 
a  natural  one,  while  the  latter  is  a  more  rational  one  following  upon 
the  perception  of  the  advantages  of  association.^  Ross  also  finds 
racial  difference  when  it  comes  to  the  matter  of  sociability.  The 
superior  dolichocephalic  blond  race  of  North  Europe  is  "mediocre 
in  power  of  sympathy  and  weak  in  sociability"  but  it  has  a  pre- 
eminent sense  of  justice.  It  is  the  protestant  race,  the  race  which 
achieves  dominion  over  others  and  individual  liberty.'* 

In  connection  with  the  place  of  the  group  or  social  factor  in 
the  explanation  of  the  social  process,  it  is  of  interest  to  note  that 
Ross  recognizes  the  fact  of  the  transition  from  an  individualistic 
type  of  psychology  to  a  social  psychology: 

The  older  psychology  was  individualistic  in  its  interpretations.  The  con- 
tents of  the  mind  were  looked  upon  as  elaborations  out  of  personal  experience. 
It  sought  to  show  how  from  the  primary  sense-perceptions  are  built  up  ideas, 
at  first  simple,  then  more  and  more  complex — ideas  of  space,  time,  number, 
cause,  etc.  The  upper  stories  of  f)ersonality,  framed  on  beUefs,  standards, 
valuations  and  ideals,  were  comparatively  neglected.  The  psychologists  failed 
to  note  that  for  these  highly  elaborated  products  we  are  more  indebted  to  our 
fellowmen  than  to  our  individual  experience,  that  they  are  wrought  out,  as  it 

'  Ibid.,  p.  14.  '  Ibid.,  p.  15.  ^  Ibid.,  p.  17. 

*  Ibid.,  pp.  32  ff.,  439  ff.;  Social  Psychology,  pp.  6  ff.  One  wonders  what  the  effect 
of  the  experiences  of  the  war  may  be  upon  this  naive  conception.  If  there  is  one  thing 
that  contemporary  social  psychology  is  a  unit  in,  it  is  that  such  pseudo-racial  deduc- 
tions are  of  decreasing  value. 


442  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

were,  collectively,  and  not  by  each  for  himself.  The  newer  psychology,  in 
accounting  for  the  contents  of  the  mind,  gives  great  prominence  to  the  social 
factor.  It  insists  that  without  interaction  with  other  minds  the  psychic  devel- 
opment of  the  child  would  be  arrested  at  a  stage  not  far  from  idiocy.' 

This  criticism  of  the  older  psychology  is  certainly  sound.  It  is 
also  true  that  there  has  been  going  on  a  swing  to  the  social  inter- 
pretation of  the  origin  of  the  mind  both  phylogenetically  and  onto- 
genetically.  The  shift  which  Ross  mentions  here  is  the  most 
significant  shift  in  the  social  sciences.  It  is  essentially  the  shift 
to  the  group  as  the  center  of  thought  and  investigation. 

In  attempting  to  apply  the  newer  psychology,  which  he  expressly 
adopts,  Ross  follows  in  the  path  of  Tarde  and  Baldwin.  To  the 
former  particularly  is  he  indebted  for  his  thought.  If  one  were 
to  find  in  his  whole  sociological  system  a  central  thought,  it  is  the 
explanation  of  social  life  in  terms  of  the  planes  and  currents  of 
uniformity  which  are  achieved  by  means  of  suggestion  and  imita- 
tion. The  role  of  the  individual  is  that  of  the  inventor.  The 
innovator's  products  are  made  the  possession  of  the  group  by  the 
process  of  imitation  or  suggestion.  Aside  from  imitation  Ross 
has  no  clue  to  explain  the  social  process.  Its  inadequacy  is  not 
recognized,  and  the  tendency  is  for  it  to  be  used  uncritically  without 
any  attempt  to  enter  into  its  psychological  limitations.^ 

In  dealing  with  that  most  interesting  part  of  contemporary 
social  psychology,  the  nature  and  origin  of  the  self,  Ross  does  not 
go  much  farther  than  to  refer  with  approval  occasionally  to  Baldwin, 
as  suggested  above.  Such  references,  however,  do  not  penetrate 
to  the  center  of  Ross's  thinking,  and  they  are  essentially  foreign 
to  his  general  argument.  For  all  practical  purposes,  he  assumes 
the  self  as  given,  the  individual  as  already  formed.  His  problem 
is  then  the  rather  futile  one  of  attempting  to  mold  and  shape  this 
complete  individual  into  social  conformity,  to  bend  the  individual 
will  into  some  sort  of  social  order.     Such  is  the  central  thesis  one 

'  Social  Psychology,  p.  1 1 . 

'  Ross  shaped  his  thinking  at  the  time  when  the  imitation  theory  was  at  its  height. 
Its  place  in  psychology  has  materially  waned  since  then  and  it  occupies  a  relatively 
small  place  in  genetic  psychology  now.  Trenchant  criticisms  of  the  imitation  theory 
are  suggested  by  Mead,  Psychological  Bulletin,  December  15,  1909;  Dewey,  Monroe's 
Cyclopedia  of  Education. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY''    443 

finds  in  the  books  to  which  we  have  referred.  Had  he  mastered 
the  significance  of  Baldwin's  contributions  to  the  problem  of  social 
psychology,  to  say  nothing  of  the  advances  that  have  been  made 
upon  Baldwin's  work,  he  must  have  realized  that  he  was  neglecting 
the  most  fertile  field  for  the  utilization  of  the  group  concept  in  the 
field  of  social  psychology.  Underneath  the  planes  and  currents 
of  uniformity  which  we  see  on  the  surface  of  society  are  vast  depths 
to  which  he  does  not  apply  himself.  Professor  Mead  has  put  his 
finger  on  the  weakness  just  noted,  in  these  words:  "Sociality  is 
for  Professor  Ross  no  fundamental  feature  of  human  consciousness, 
no  determining  form  of  its  structure."^  In  other  words,  he  has 
made  only  a  partial,  though  stimulating,  use  of  his  group  concept. 
His  thinking  is  essentially  individualistic.  He  stands  as  a  transition 
point  in  the  development  of  the  recognition  of  the  essentially 
fundamental  importance  of  sociality,  of  the  group,  in  social 
interpretations. 

Ellwood  defines  sociology  as  the  science  of  the  origin,  develop- 
ment, structure,  and  function  of  the  reciprocal  relations  of  indi- 
viduals.^ As  will  be  found  out  in  later  discussion,  he  makes  special 
mention  of  the  psychic  interaction  which,  in  his  opinion,  is  the 
essence  of  the  social  process.  In  other  words,  his  definition  of 
the  subject  implies  a  group  relation  to  start  with.  In  so  far  as  the 
social  origins  are  to  be  treated,  they  must  be  treated  with 
the  primary  assumption  of  a  group  of  social  beings  in  more 
or  less  of  psychic  interaction.  "In  a  psychological  interpreta- 
tion of  society,  therefore,  we  must  begin  with  concerted  or 
co-ordinated  activity,  with  the  group  acting  together  in  some 
particular  way,  for  it  is  this  which  constitutes  the  group  a 
functional  unity,  and  which  is  the  first  psychic  manifesta- 
tion of  group  Hfe."^  For  Ellwood,  this  interacting  relationship, 
this  psychic  stimulus  and  response,  is  the  central  factor  in  sociologi- 
cal study.  In  looking  for  a  concrete  object  which  may  be  adopted 
as  the  unit  or  object  of  investigation  he  finds  it  in  the  group.     "So 

'  Mead, "  Social  Psychology  as  Counterpart  to  Physical  Psychology,"  Psychological 
Bulletin,  December  15,  1909. 

'  Sociology  in  Its  Psychological  Aspects,  p.  15.  ^  Ibid.,  pp.  146-47- 


444  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

far  as  there  is  a  concrete  object  of  the  sociologist's  attention,  it  is 
the  group  of  associated  individuals.'"  As  soon  as  the  investigator 
shifts  his  attention  from  interactions  to  the  individuals  concerned 
in  the  associational  process  or  mental  interaction,  he  becomes  a 
psychologist  or  biologist  and  loses  the  end  of  the  sociologist's  quest. 
We  thus  see  that  in  Ellwood's  general  introduction  to  the  socio- 
logical problem  he  has  the  group  in  the  foreground  as  the  sine  qua 
non  of  his  search.  Whether  used  adequately  or  not,  it  is  the  basic 
assumption  in  all  his  thinking.  How  it  is  used  in  the  various  prob- 
lems he  meets  will  appear  in  later  pages  of  this  review. 

To  bring  out  more  clearly  the  central  place  which  the  group 
occupies  in  Ellwood's  thought  it  will  be  worth  while  to  refer  to  his 
discussion  of  the  nature  and  origm  of  society.  After  reviewing 
several  conceptions  of  society  which  have  been  suggested  by  differ- 
ent writers,  he  adopts  as  a  tentative  definition  of  society,"  any  group 
of  psychically  interacting  individuals."^  "The  only  criterion  by 
which  we  may  decide  whether  any  group  constitutes  a  society  or 
not  is  its  possession  or  non-possession  of  the  essential  mark  of  a 
society,  namely,  the  functional  interdependence  of  its  members  on  the 
psychical  side."^  Applying  this  criterion  to  various  groups  such 
as  a  family,  a  nation,  a  debating  club,  a  civilization,  he  finds  that 
they  are  all  within  the  given  category.  The  term  society  as  he 
uses  it  is  a  very  broad  one,  and  would  come  within  the  meaning  of 
the  term  group  where  that  term  is  used  to  cover  social  situations 
in  which  the  actions  of  one  form  of  life  answer  to  and  stimulate 
activities  in  another  form.  The  definition  given  above  indicates 
the  bent  of  Ellwood's  thinking  along  the  psychological  line  of 
approach  to  the  sociological  problem.  He  does  not  ignore  the 
biological  approach,  but  feels  that  the  psychological  is  the  more 
important  as  the  basis  for  an  adequate  sociology.  Some  of  the 
possible  criticisms  of  his  stressing  of  the  "psychical"  interactions 
will  be  mentioned  later. 

With  this  view  of  the  nature  and  definition  of  society  we  may 
proceed  to  the  problem  of  the  origin  of  society.  To  begin  with, 
EUwood  points  out  that  the  life-process  is  essentially  social.     It 

'  Sociology  in  Its  Psychological  Aspects,  p.  22, 
'  Ibid.,  p.  13.  ^  Ibid.,  p.  14. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  ''DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"    445 

involves  interaction  from  the  start.  This  interaction  goes  through 
an  evolution  from  a  physical  to  a  psychical  basis.  He  expressly 
repudiates  the  individualistic  approach  to  the  problem  of  the  origin 
of  society  and  adopts  the  group  as  his  starting-point. 

Life  is  not,  and  cannot  be,  an  affair  of  individual  organisms.  The  processes 
of  both  nutrition  and  reproduction  of  all  higher  forms  of  life  involve  a  necessary- 
interdependence  among  organisms  of  the  same  species,  which,  except  under 
unfavorable  conditions,  gives  rise  to  group  life  and  psychical  interaction. 
Society  is  no  more  the  result  of  the  coming  together  of  individuals  in  isolation 
than  the  multicellular  organism  is  the  restdt  of  the  coming  together  of  cells 
so  developed.  Society,  that  is,  the  psychical  interaction  of  individuals,  is  an 
expression  of  the  original  and  continuing  xmity  of  the  life-process  of  the  asso- 
ciating organisms.' 

We  have  here  then  an  avowed  adoption  of  what  has  been  called  the 
social  hypothesis,  or,  in  other  words,  the  group  concept,  as  the 
fundamental  starting-point  in  the  discussion  of  the  much-discussed 
problem  of  the  origin  of  society.  The  contrast  with  the  position 
of  Ward  and  much  of  the  earlier  sociological  thought  is  abrupt  and 
definite.  Ellwood  states  that  the  "most  serious  errors  in  sociology 
have  been  introduced  through  the  assumption  of  primitive  isolation 
or  separateness."'' 

In  carrying  out  in  more  detail  the  development  of  society, 
Ellwood  shows  how  social  life  is  a  function  of  the  food  and  repro- 
ductive processes.  Under  ordinary  conditions  the  food  process  is 
essentially  a  social  matter  or  group  matter.  It  is  of  fundamental 
importance  both  to  the  individual  and  to  the  group.  The  social 
factor  has  selective  value  in  the  food  process. 

Now,  control  over  the  food  process  can  be  more  easily  established  by  groups 
of  co-operating  individuals  than  by  isolated  individuals.  Natural  selection 
operates,  therefore,  from  the  first  in  favor  of  such  groups,  and  toward  the  elimi- 
nation of  individuals  living  relatively  isolated.  It  must  especially  favor  those 
groups  in  which  the  interactions  between  individual  units  are  quick  and 
sure — that  is,  those  groups  in  which  the  power  of  psychic  inter-stimulation  and 
reponse  is  fully  estabUshed  and  in  which  intelligent  co-operation  and  orderly 
relations  between  individuals  are  highly  developed.  It  is  not  an  accident  that 
the  most  successful,  and,  in  general,  the  higher  animals  live  in  groups  with 
well-ordered  relations  and  highly  developed  means  of  inter-stimulation  and 
co-operation. •^ 

^  lUd.,  p.  125.  'Ibid.,  p.  126.  ilbid.,  p.  127. 


446  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

However  important  the  food  process  may  be  in  the  group  life, 
the  reproductory  process  is  still  more  important  as  a  group  factor 
in  the  evolution  of  the  higher  types  of  association  or  society.  The 
presence  of  the  young  implies  a  social  situation  in  which  there  are 
at  least  two  persons.  The  most  important  of  the  relations  growing 
out  of  the  reproductive  process  is  not  the  relation  of  the  male  to 
the  female,  but  of  the  parent  to  the  child,  particularly  the  relation 
of  the  mother  and  the  child.  This  becomes  increasingly  important 
as  the  period  of  infancy  is  prolonged : 

In  the  relationship  of  the  mother  to  the  child  we  have  the  beginnings  of 
that  sympathetic  social  life  of  which  the  family  has  remained  the  highest  type, 
and  which  has  become  the  conscious  goal  of  civilized  human  society.  Society 
in  the  sympathetic  sense  then  has  had  its  beginnings  in  the  family,  that  is, 
in  the  relation  of  the  child  form  to  the  mother  form.* 

Human  society  is  but  an  evolution  of  animal  societies.  In  other 
words,  the  group  life  was  characteristic  of  the  ancestors  of  man; 
"animal  society  is  the  precursor  of  human  society,"  and  human 
society  is  "but  a  form  of  animal  society."  The  "whole  difference 
between  the  two  ....  is  in  the  forms  and  definiteness  of  the 
psychical  interaction  between  individuals."''  The  chief  charac- 
teristic distinguishing  human  from  animal  society  is  the  possession, 
by  the  former,  of  language  and  abstract  reasoning.  All  other 
differences  can  be  reduced  to  these  two.^  Whatever  degree  of 
difference  may  exist  between  the  two  types  of  society,  human 
society  is  an  inheritance  from  animal  society  and  may  be  regarded 
as  a  form  of  animal  society.  The  origin  of  society  has  been  afifected 
and  modified  by  the  intellectual  factors  that  have  developed,  but 
"human  society  is  not  in  any  sense  an  intellectual  construction 
due  to  the  perceptions  of  the  utilities  of  association."^  In  other 
words,  the  intellectual  factors  are  a  result  of  the  group  life,  and  their 
presence  assumes  the  priority  of  the  group  as  a  necessary  precedent. 
This  is  an  exact  reversal  of  the  position  taken  by  Ward.  The 
group  is  thus  conceived,  in  Ellwood's  thinking,  as  the  fundamental 
concept  in  the  explanation  of  the  origin  of  contemporary  social  life. 

'  Sociology  in  Its  Psychological  Aspects,  p.  129. 

'Ibid.,  p.  131. 

i  Ibid.,  p.  132.  *Ibid.,  pp.  137-38. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"    447 

In  order  to  show  further  the  place  of  the  group  concept,  it  is 
interesting  to  discover  what  answer  Ellwood  gives  to  the  question 
as  to  whether  man  was  primitively  a  social  animal.  The  foregoing 
discussion  implies  the  emphatic  affirmative  answer  he  gives  to  the 
question : 

There  is  not  the  sUghtest  evidence  that  man  was  ever  a  solitary  creature, 
or  even  that  he  hved  in  solitary  family  groups.  The  evidence  from  the  highest 
animals,  from  prehistoric  archaeology,  from  the  lowest  existing  savages,  from 
human  instincts,  from  language  and  other  sources,  points  to  the  conclusion  that 
primitive  man  hved  in  hordes  of  several  related  families.' 

This,  it  will  be  remembered,  is  contrary  to  the  argument  of  Ward. 
The  distinction  between  the  two  is  that  Ellwood  maintains  the  group 
concept  in  his  theory  of  origins.  With  reference  to  the  much- 
elaborated  "anti-social"  characteristics,  which  led  Ward  and  others 
to  predicate  a  non-social  primitive  ancestor  of  man,  Ellwood  points 
out  that  these  qualities  are  a  later  development,  due  to  the  changes 
in  the  group  life: 

The  answer  is  that  while  man  was  primitively  social,  his  sociality  was 
narrow,  confined  largely  to  the  family  and  to  the  kindred  group,  and  that 
consequently  he  is  not  as  yet  well  adapted  to  wider  social  relations.  It  is 
interesting  to  note,  however,  that  these  so-called  anti-social  traits  of  man  are 
not  found  most  fuUy  developed  among  the  lowest  savages.  Rather  they 
characterize  peoples  that  are  somewhat  advanced  in  culture,  particularly  those 

in  the  stage  of  barbarism The  lowest  peoples  in  point  of  culture  even 

at  the  present  time  we  find  again  to  be  essentially  peaceful.  War  with  its  feroci- 
ties, cannibalism,  and  slavery  are  relatively  late  products,  then,  in  social  evolu- 
tion, and  incident  to  man's  adjustment  to  a  wide  and  more  complex  social 
environment.  It  is,  therefore,  quite  within  the  truth  to  say  that  it  is  the  struggle 
and  conflict  that  have  been  developed  with  the  species  in  its  more  complex  stages 
of  evolution  that  have  called  forth,  sometimes  in  exaggerated  forms,  the  preda- 
tory and  anti-social  tendencies  which  we  see  more  or  less  in  human  society 
at  present.^ 

In  so  far  then  as  there  is  a  problem  of  socialization,  it  is  one  of 
making  the  individual  a  factor  in  the  larger  and  more  complex  life 
of  the  community  so  as  to  extend  his  habitual  small  group  attitudes 
to  the  larger  groups  also.  EUwood's  use  of  the  group  as  the  tool 
for  the  interpretation  of  the  origin  of  society  and  for  the  explanation 
of  the  so-called  anti-social  characteristics,  particularly  the  latter, 

'  Ibid.,  pp.  137-38.  '  Ibid.,  pp.  138-39. 


448  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

is  a  real  advance  over  the  position  of  Ward.  It  displays  an  adequate 
grasp  of  the  place  of  the  group  as  the  fundamental  starting-point 
for  sociology  and  for  all  social  sciences  as  well.  The  group  concept 
marks  the  most  significant  step  in  sociological  thought  since  Ward's 
Dynamic  Sociology. 

Professor  Ellwood  emphasizes  the  importance  of  the  "primary 
groups"  as  they  are  conceived  by  Cooley.  These  face-to-face 
groups  constitute  the  most  significant  agencies  by  which  social 
unity  is  created  and  continued: 

Now,  these  small  primary  groups,  the  family,  the  neighborhood  community, 
and  other  groups  which  involve  face-to-face  association,  are  manifestly  the 
natural  environment  for  the  development  of  the  social  traits  of  the  individual. 
They  are,  in  other  words,  the  natural  medium  for  the  development  of  our  social 
Hfe;  they  preserve  its  unity  in  time,  and  hence  we  shall  have  to  consider  them 
at  length  when  we  consider  the  problem  of  social  continuity.' 

These  groups  are  the  particular  carriers  of  tradition.  It  is 
through  them  more  than  through  our  schools,  churches,  etc.,  that 
the  social  life,  the  social  inheritance,  is  transmitted  from  generation 
to  generation.  "So  important  is  tradition  in  human  society  that 
in  practically  all  stages  of  civilization  we  find  certain  institutions 
whose  special  work  is  to  be  carriers  of  tradition.  In  modern  civili- 
zation these  institutions  are  especially  schools,  churches,  libraries, 
and  the  like.  However,  the  real  carriers  of  tradition  are  not  these 
specialized  institutions,  but  the  primary  groups  of  which  we  have 
already  spoken,  especially  the  family  and  the  neighborhood  groups. 
If  human  society  had  to  rely  upon  schools  and  libraries  to  conserve 
its  mental  life,  its  continuity  on  the  psychic  side  would  be  very 
imperfectly  developed."' 

The  great  importance  attached  to  the  family  group  is  char- 
acteristic of  all  of  Ellwood 's  writings. 

The  family  is  perhaps  the  chief  institutional  vehicle  of  tradition  in  human 
society.  It  has  been  such  in  all  stages  of  civilization,  and  as  long  as  it  continues 
to  be  the  chief  environment  of  children  of  tender  years,  it  will  doubtless  con- 
tinue to  be  so.  In  the  family  the  child  learns  his  language,  and  in  learning  it 
he  gets  with  it  the  fundamental  knowledge,  behefs,  and  standards  contained 
in  the  tradition  of  his  civilization,  or  at  least  of  his  class.     So  much  does  the 

'  Sociology  in  Its  Psychological  Aspects,  p.  119. 
'  Introdnclion  lo  Social  Psychology,  p.  135. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"    449 

child  get  his  essential  social  traditions  from  his  family  life  that  many  educators 
claim  that  moral  instruction  can  never  be  given  adequately  in  our  public  schools, 
but  that  the  real  foundation  of  the  moral  tradition  must  be  gotten  while  the 
child  is  yet  of  tender  age  from  his  family  circle.' 

This  small  family  group  with  its  close  association  is  the  source  of 
the  primary  ideals.  From  this  smaller  group  life  these  ideals  are 
carried  into  the  larger  groups. 

It  is  from  the  family  group  that  we  get,  in  the  main,  our  notions  of  love, 
service  and  self-sacrifice;  and  we  learn  these  ideals  in  the  farmly  the  more 
effectively,  because  the  life  of  the  normal  family  group  usually  illustrates  the 
practices  which  these  ideals  stand  for.  Taking  these  primary  ideals  from  the 
family  life,  we  apply  them  to  the  social  life  generally,  and  even  to  humam'ty  at 
large.  The  family  then,  we  may  say,  is  the  natural  medium  for  the  develop- 
ment and  transmission  of  the  ideals  and  standards  of  the  social  hfe.  It  has 
been  the  cradle  of  civilization  in  the  past,  and  something  like  its  organization 
seems  to  be  the  normal  goal  which  men  set  up  for  society  at  large  to  reahze. 
Two  traditional  ideals  which  are  potent  in  our  civilization,  for  example  the 
fatherhood  of  God  and  the  brotherhood  of  man,  are  quite  sufficient  in  themselves 
to  illustrate  the  importance  of  the  family  as  a  maker  and  conserver  of  social 
ideals.* 

From  the  neighborhood  groups  certain  ideals  are  gathered  by 
the  child  which  are  fundamental  for  its  participation  in  any  social 
group. 

In  the  same  way,  we  have  received  from  our  neighborhood  group  the  ideals 
of  freedom,  fair  play,  justice  and  good  citizenship.  The  very  ideal  of  social 
soUdarity  itself  comes,  as  Professor  Cooley  shows,  from  the  unity  experiences 
in  these  small  primary  groups.  Inasmuch  as  these  groups  have  certain  traits 
which  are  found  in  all  stages  of  civilization,  there  is  certainly  much  to  be  said 
for  Professor  Cooley's  idea  that  what  we  ordinarily  call  "hxmian  nature  "is 
largely  acquired  there.^ 

The  reason  why  those  groups  are  so  important  and  powerful 
in  engrafting  the  fundamental  social  traditions  on  the  growing  gen- 
eration is  that  the  meanings  of  these  traditions  are  accompanied, 
to  a  large  extent,  by  actual  behavior.  They  are  thus  a  part  of  the 
activity  of  the  child  rather  than  being  merely  precepts. 

The  meaning  of  essential  traditions  is  clearer  in  these  groups  to  the  young 
because  they  are  accompanied,  to  a  large  extent,  by  actual  behavoir  correlated 
with  the  tradition.    In  other  words,  these  groups  are  also  the  carriers  of  custom, 

'  Ibid.,  p.  135.  =■  Ibid.,  pp.  136-37.  J  Ibid.,  p.  137. 


450  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

in  the  sense  of  definite  habits  of  social  behavior.  The  child  therefore  can  get 
the  meaning  of  a  certain  tradition  regarding  government,  religion  or  morality, 
for  example,  from  the  family  Ufe,  better  than  he  can  from  the  printed  page  or 
even  the  spoken  word.  He  can  get  the  meaning,  too,  better  in  the  close  and 
intimate  relations  of  the  family  group  than  he  can  in  the  more  partial  and  uncer- 
tain associations  of  the  school  or  the  neighborhood.' 

Professor  Ellwood  might  have  carried  this  suggestion  of  his  func- 
tional psychology  further.  It  is  a  logical  explanation  coming  from 
one  whose  express  psychological  point  of  view  is  that  the  act  is  the 
proper  unit  of  thought. 

The  use  of  the  primary  group  in  tracing  so  large  a  part  of  social 
evolution  thus  constitutes  one  of  the  most  important  uses  of  the 
group  concept  possible.  In  emphasizing  these  small  groups, 
Ellwood  is  recognizing  in  social  theory  one  of  the  striking  develop- 
ments in  contemporary  practical  life,  namely,  the  growing  con- 
sciousness of  the  small  local  group  as  the  center  of  so  many  phases 
of  social  activity.^ 

One  of  the  interesting  and  fruitful  ways  in  which  Ellwood 
applies  his  psychology  to  group  situations  is  shown  in  his  discussion 
of  the  problem  of  the  origin  and  function  of  social  consciousness. 
Applying  the  analogy  of  the  role  of  consciousness  in  individual 
life,  he  finds  that  social  consciousness  arises  when  a  group 
crisis  arises,  that  is,  when  the  old  and  hitherto  useful  habits 
have  broken  down  and  are  no  longer  able  to  meet  the  situation. 
In  such  cases  social  consciousness  enters,  and  like  indi\ddual  con- 
sciousness, its  role  is  to  create  a  new  adjustment  in  a  conflict 
situation.    He  describes  the  process  in  this  manner : 

One  can  say,  in  a  general  way,  perhaps,  and  be  approximately  near  the 
truth,  that  all  social  changes  start  in  an  unconscious  way;  that  they  are  then 
brought  to  consciousness,  and  later  conscious  eflforts  are  made  to  guide  and 
control  them.  In  other  words,  social  changes  start,  as  a  rule,  with  some  change 
in  the  environment  or  in  the  inner  make-up  of  the  group,  which  makes  old 
social  habits  and  institutions  no  longer  well  adjusted,  or  even  altogether 
unworkable.  Thus,  changes  in  the  mere  numbers  of  a  group  may  make  some 
social  custom,  adapted  to  a  smaller  group,  unworkable.  In  some  cases  where 
the  new  adjustments  to  be  made  are  slight,  or  take  place  very  slowly,  they  may 
not  come  vividly  into  the  consciousness  of  the  members  of  a  group.     But  when 

'  Introduction  to  Sociol  Psychology,  pp.  135-36. 
'  See  introductory  chapter. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY''    451 

the  changes  are  great,  rapid,  or  complex,  they  come  into  the  consciousness  of 
the  members  of  the  group,  and  some  attempt  to  control  them  usually  takes 
place.' 

Now  it  is  evident  that  what  is  called  social  consciousness  in  human  groups 
has  to  do  with  the  adaptation  of  the  group  as  a  whole  to  some  situation,  just  as 
individual  consciousness  has  to  do  with  adaptation.  It  is  only  by  developing 
such  a  state  that  the  activities  of  the  members  of  a  group  can  be  accurately 
co-ordinated  in  the  way  required  by  a  complex  social  life.  The  more  complex 
groups,  therefore,  show  more  social  consciousness.  The  city  group  shows  more 
than  the  rural  group,  and  the  civilized  group  more  than  the  uncivilized.^ 

Some  light  for  our  discussion  may  be  gained  in  considering 
EUwood's  conception  of  the  nature  and  function  of  the  mind.  This 
is  one  of  the  crucial  points  in  the  problems  of  social  origins  and  is 
significant  for  our  purposes,  since  it  reveals  pretty  clearly  just  what 
the  point  of  view  of  a  particular  writer  under  discussion  may  be. 
In  any  given  case  it  displays  whether  the  group  conception  is  the 
fundamental  one,  or  whether  the  author  has  recourse  to  an  indi- 
vidualistic explanation  for  the  difficult  problem  he  faces.  The 
significance  of  this  for  social  control  and  for  social  theory  will  be 
pointed  out  later.  The  mind,  according  to  Ellwood,  is  a  part  of 
the  life-process  and  a  part  of  the  general  evolutionary  stream. ^ 
Its  function  is  that  of  control  over  complex  adaptive  processes.'' 
Consciousness  arises  where  new  adjustments  or  adaptations  to  a 
complex  situation  are  made  necessary  by  the  failure  or  inadequacy 
of  pre-existing  co-ordinations.^  Mind  thus  comes  to  be  a  thing 
having  distinct  survival  value,  and  as  such  giving  hvmian  beings 
an  enormous  advantage.*^  From  the  very  first,  since  it  is  selective, 
it  assumes  a  teleological  or  purposeful  role.^  This  purposive  activity 
increases  in  scope  and  importance  until  at  the  present  complex 
stage  of  the  higher  civilizations,  it  may  be  said  to  be  the  dominant 
type.^ 

This  resiune  of  EUwood's  discussion  is  sufficient  to  show  that 
his  effort  is  to  follow  the  general  lines  of  a  functional  psychology. 
His  footnote  acknowledgments  express  his  definite  nominal  adher- 
ence to  that  point  of  view.  His  adherence  to  a  consistent  func- 
tional psychology  is  apparent,  rather  than  real.     The  mind,  with 

^  Ibid.,  p.  147.  *Ibid.  1 1bid. 

'  Ibid.,  pp.  152-53.  ^Ibid.  *  Ibid.,  p.  33. 

J  Ibid.,  pp.  30-33.  ^  Ibid. 


452  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

him,  is  still  a  thing  in  itself.  Consciousness  "comes  in"  to  mediate 
difl&cult  conflict  situations.  Both  mind  and  consciousness  remain 
entities  which  are  unexplained,  and,  except  when  making  an  effort 
to  cIeiss  himself  as  a  functionalist,  he  is  using  a  structural  point  of 
view.  His  writing  exhibits  an  interesting  halfway  station  between 
an  earlier  structural-metaphysical  point  of  view  and  a  later  func- 
tional point  of  view,  with  the  former  predominating.' 

As  a  supplementary  fact  to  this  criticism  one  may  add  the  more 
or  less  recurring  dualism  running  through  that  part  of  Ellwood's 
discussion  dealing  with  social  psychology.  This  probably  is  a 
natural  result  of  his  conception  of  mind  or  consciousness  as  an  entity. 
He  carefully  distinguishes  between  physical  interaction  and  psychic 
interaction.^  ''Each  mind  is,  so  far  as  we  know,  wholly  unconnected 
with  other  minds  except  through  the  intervention  of  physical 
media. "^  This  uncoilscious  dualism  pervades  both  of  Ellwood's 
major  works,  and  is  never  unified.  Just  why  the  glance  of  the  eye, 
the  movement  of  the  body  of  one  form,  and  the  reciprocal  gestures 
and  cries  of  another  form,  are  not  as  much  a  part  of  the  psychical 
as  any  other  part  of  the  total  activity  circuit  is  hard  to  see.'*  To 
take  the  act  and  not  an  isolated  segment  called  psychic  as  the 
unit  seems  the  only  way  out  of  the  dualism.  The  act  is  social, 
and  in  so  far  as  it  has  significance  for  sociology  it  involves  the  group. 
To  segment  the  act  is  to  make  an  inadequate  use  of  the  group  con- 
cept in  approaching  the  very  interesting  and  difficult  problem  of 
the  "mind."s 

'  Professor  Ellwood  follows  the  error  of  so  many  functional  psychologists  in  bring- 
ing in  a  "consciousness"  to  mediate  conflict  crises,  without  explaining  the  new  factor. 
Nothing  is  gained  by  substituting  a  new  metaphysical  entity  for  the  "soul "  or  "  mind  " 
of  earlier  psychologists.  The  functionalist  must  reduce  his  consciousness  to  terms 
of  behavior,  to  activity,  to  escape.  Weiss  distinguishes  between  functional  and 
behavioristic  psychology:  "Perhaps  the  distinguishing  difference  between  the 
functionalist  and  the  behaviorist  lies  in  the  fact  that  the  behaviorist  disregards  the 
entity  which  the  functionalist  calls  consciousness"  ("Relation  between  Functional 
and  Behavior  Psychology,"  Psychological  Review,  XXIV',  367).  On  such  a  basis 
Ellwood  would  be  classed  as  a  functionalist. 

*  Introduction  to  Social  Psychology,  pp.  5,  6,  8,  9.  ^  Ibid.,  p.  79. 

*  Dewey,  Reflex  A  re  Concept. 

s  Attention  should  be  called  to  Ellwood's  article,  "Objectivism  in  Sociology," 
American  Journal  of  Sociology,  XXII  (1916),  289,  in  which  he  attacks  the  extreme 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  ''DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY''    453 

Before  leaving  this  phase  of  the  discussion  it  should  be  noted 
that  Ellwood  recognizes  and  emphasizes  the  fact  that  the  mind  is 
a  social  product: 

We  cannot  doubt  the  social  character  of  the  individual  mind.  While 
consciousness  exists  only  in  the  individual,  every  aspect  of  consciousness  has 
been  socially  conditioned.  This  is  true  even  of  the  racially  inherited  aspects 
of  consciousness,  the  instincts,  emotions,  and  practically  all  native  impulses. 
The  higher  human  instincts  and  emotions,  especially,  show  very  plainly  their 
reference  to  the  social  life,  and  function  quite  as  much  with  reference  to  the 
life  of  the  group  as  they  do  with  reference  to  the  life  of  the  individual.  The 
acquired  traits  of  consciousness  practically  all  come  to  us  through  our  social 
environment.  From  it  we  get  not  only  our  knowledge,  our  beliefs,  our  ideals, 
but  even  our  precepts  and  concepts,  in  the  strict  sense  of  these  terms.  It  is 
in  the  "give  and  take"  of  the  social  life  that  we  learn  and  develop  practically 
all  of  the  phases  of  the  consciousness  of  adult  life.  In  a  word,  mind  has  been 
developed  through  interaction  of  mind  with  mind  in  the  carrying  on  and  con- 
trolhng  of  common  life  processes.  Mental  life  belongs,  therefore,  quite  as 
much  to  the  group  as  to  the  individual.^ 

This  point  of  view,  which  one  might  denominate  the  prevailing  one 
in  contemporary  sociology  in  America,  is  adhered  to  pretty  con- 
sistently throughout  Ellwood's  writings.  He  does  not,  however, 
furnish  any  sufficient  process  whereby  the  result  arrived  at  in  the 
group  relation,  namely,  the  development  of  the  mind,  the  self,  or 
consciousness,  is  explained.  Just  what  the  process  is,  in  terms  of 
functional  psychology,  whereby  language,  meaning,  and  mind  have 
been  created  by  the  group  is  not  set  forth.  Imitation  is  stressed, 
but  it  cannot  suffice.^  Until  this  gap  is  filled,  it  would  seem  there 
can  be  no  complete  social  psychology.  It  is  the  missing  link  in 
the  application  of  the  group  concept  to  the  problems  of  sociology. 
On  the  whole,  Ellwood  has  made  one  of  the  distinguished  con- 
tributions to  sociological  thought  in  America.     The  group  concept  is 


claims  of  objectivism,  or  "  physiological  sociology."  He  feels  that  both  the  subjective 
and  the  objective  methods  may  be  of  value  to  the  sociologist.  In  answer  to  Ellwood's 
article,  see  Bernard's,  "The  Objective  Viewpoint  in  Sociology,"  American  Journal  of 
Sociology,  XXV,  298. 

'  Introduction  to  Social  Psychology,  p.  73. 

^  The  lack  of  a  process  is  sho\vn  clearly  in  Ellwood's  treatment  of  imitation  in 
both  his  larger  works.  It  is  outside  our  province  to  do  more  than  call  attention  to 
it  here. 


454  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

one  of  his  fundamental  concepts.  One  is  struck  by  the  frequency 
with  which  the  word  recurs  on  aknost  every  page  of  his  writings. 
He  has  gone  a  long  distance  in  attempting  to  bring  to  sociology  the 
results  and  methods  of  a  newer  type  of  psychology.  That  he  left 
some  gaps  and  unexplored  corners,  or  that  he  failed  to  apply  his  tools 
in  the  proper  way  at  all  times,  is  not  surprising.  The  chief  criticism 
that  might  be  made  is  that  he  did  not  go  far  enough.  What  he  lacks 
may  be  ascribed  to  the  mixture  of  an  older  psychology  with  his 
functional  superstructure,  or  "the  endeavor  to  adapt  the  rubrics 
of  introspective  psychology  to  the  facts  of  objective  associated 
life."' 

Cooley's  writings  have  given  him  rank  as  one  of  the  real  con- 
tributors to  sociological  thought  in  America.  The  three  books 
under  consideration  may  all  be  ranked  as  studies  in  social  psychol- 
ogy rather  than  in  general  sociology  or  social  origins.^  The  subject 
which  formed  the  problem  of  investigation  for  his  first  book,  society 
and  the  individual,  may  be  looked  upon  as  the  subject  of  his  writings 
in  general.  The  situation  before  him  is  always  one  invohong  a 
group.  This  summary  will  not  attempt  to  present  a  review  of  his 
whole  system,  but  will  select  out  saHent  parts  which  seem  to  display 
most  clearly  the  use  of  the  group  concept  in  his  analysis  of  the  vari- 
ous problems  that  he  attempts  to  treat.  Such  problems,  for 
example,  as  the  relation  of  society  to  the  individual;  the  nature  of 
the  mind  in  so  far  as  it  is  both  social  and  individual,  the  nature  and 
formation  of  the  self,  the  nature  and  origin  and  importance  of 
primary  groups,  freedom,  pecuniary  valuation,  will  give  a  fairly 
good  insight  into  the  use  made  of  the  group  concept. 

We  may  begin,  as  he  does  in  his  first  book,  with  the  long-debated 
problem  of  the  relation  of  the  individual  to  the  group,  or  society 
and  the  individual.     Of  the  fundamental  nature  of  his  conception 

'  Dewey  has  thus  characterized  some  of  the  attempts  at  a  social  psychology  and 
attributes  to  it  the  main  responsibility  for  the  backward  state  of  social  pyschology.  In 
his  opinion  the  behaviorist  approach  is  an  entirely  new  attack  upon  the  problem  and 
one  offering  hope  of  success. — "The  Need  for  Social  Psychology,"  Psychological 
Review,  XXIV  (1917),  271. 

■  The  books  referred  to  are  Human  Nature  and  the  Social  Order  (1902),  Social 
Organization  (1909),  and  Social  Process  (1918). 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  ''DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"    455 

of  this  relation  he  does  not  leave  one  long  in  doubt,  although  the 
whole  book  is  but  an  elaboration  of  the  principles  laid  down  in  the 
first  chapter. 

A  separate  individual  is  an  abstraction  unknown  to  experience,  and  so 
likewise  is  society  when  regarded  as  something  apart  from  individuals.  The 
real  thing  is  Human  Life,  which  may  be  considered  either  in  an  individual  aspect 
or  in  a  social,  that  is  to  say,  a  general,  aspect;  but  is  always,  as  a  matter  of 
fact,  both  individual  and  general.  In  other  words,  "society"  and  "individuals" 
do  not  denote  separable  phenomena,  but  are  simply  collective  and  distributive 
aspects  of  the  same  thing,  the  relation  between  them  being  hke  that  between 
other  expressions,  one  of  which  denotes  a  group  as  a  whole,  and  the  other  the 
members  of  the  group,  such  as  the  army  and  the  soldiers,  the  class  and  the 
students,  and  so  on.' 

The  point  of  view  suggested  is  so  thoroughly  a  part  of  Cooley's 
general  thought  that  it  will  be  well  to  cite  further  statements 
explaining  and  elucidating  it.  Each  will  serve  of  itself  to  show  the 
prominent  place  which  the  group  occupies  in  the  assumptions  from 
which  he  starts  his  discussions.  Continuing  the  thought  that  the 
individual  and  society  are  one,  he  says  still  more  emphatically: 
And  just  as  there  is  no  society  or  group  that  is  not  a  collective  view  of 
persons,  so  there  is  no  individual  who  may  not  be  regarded  as  a  particular  view 
of  social  groups.  He  has  no  separate  existence;  through  both  the  hereditary 
and  the  social  factors  in  his  life  a  man  is  bovmd  into  the  whole  of  which  he  is  a 
member;  and  to  consider  him  apart  from  it  is  quite  as  artificial  as  to  consider 
society  apart  from  individuals.^ 

Consequently  any  view  which  sets  society  over  against  the  indi- 
vidual, or  vice  versa,  as  its  fundamental  assumption  is  false  to  the 
facts. 

I  think,  then,  that  the  antithesis,  society  versus  the  individual,  is  false  and 
hollow  whenever  used  as  a  general  or  philosophical  statement  of  human  rela- 
tions. Whatever  ideas  may  be  in  the  minds  of  those  who  set  these  words  and 
their  derivatives  over  against  each  other,  the  notion  conveyed  is  that  of  two 
separable  entities  or  forces;  and  certainly  such  a  notion  is  untrue  to  fact.' 

In  order  to  clarify  his  conception  of  the  indissoluble  relationship 
which  he  has  described,  Cooley  expressly  repudiates  four  traditional 
conceptions  that  have  prevailed  or  do  prevail  in  current  thought. 
The  first  of  these  is  what  he  calls  "mere  individualism,"  m  which  the 

'  Human  Nature  and  the  Social  Order,  pp.  1-2. 

'  Ibid.,  p.  3.  » Ibid.,  p.  7. 


456  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

collective  aspect  is  as  nearly  as  possible  ignored:  "Each  person  is 
held  to  be  a  separate  agent,  and  all  social  phenomena  are  thought 
of  as  originating  in  the  action  of  such  agents.  The  individual  is 
the  source,  the  independent,  the  only  human  source,  of  events."^ 
This  view  enters  into  the  current  thought  of  the  day,  being  con- 
genial to  the  "ordinary  material  view  of  things  and  corroborated 
by  theological  and  other  traditions."  The  second  view  which  he 
repudiates  is  the  "double  causation,"  in  which  society  and  the 
individual  are  thought  of  as  separate  causes  with  a  division  of 
power  between  them.  This  is  the  view  "ordinarily  met  with  in 
social  and  ethical  discussion."  It  is  not  advance,  philosophically, 
upon  the  one  first  mentioned : 

There  is  the  same  premise  of  the  individual  as  a  separate  unrelated  agent; 
but  over  against  him  is  set  a  vaguely  conceived  general  or  collective  interest 
and  force.  It  seems  that  people  are  so  accustomed  to  thinking  of  themselves 
as  imcaused  causes,  special  creators  on  a  small  scale,  that  when  the  existence 
of  general  phenomena  is  forced  upon  their  notice  they  are  likely  to  regard  these 
as  something  additional,  separate,  and  more  or  less  antithetical.^ 

Another  view  which  is  inadequate,  according  to  Cooley,  is  "the 
social  faculty  view."  This  view  regards  the  social  as  including 
a  part  only  of  the  individual.  "Human  nature  is  thus  divided 
into  individualistic  or  non-social  tendencies  or  faculties,  and  those 
that  are  social.  Thus,  certain  emotions,  such  as  love,  are  social, 
others,  as  fear,  or  anger,  are  unsocial  or  individualistic."^  In 
contrast  to  this  particular-faculty  view,  Cooley  presents  the  thesis 
that  "man's  psychical  outfit  is  not  divisible  into  the  social  and  the 
non-social;  but  that  he  is  all  social  in  a  large  sense,  is  all  a  part 
of  the  common  human  life."''  A  fourth  view  which  must  be  dis- 
carded is  "primitive  individualism": 

This  expression  has  been  used  to  describe  the  view  that  sociality  follows 
individuality  in  time,  is  a  later  and  additional  product  of  development.  This 
view  is  a  variety  of  the  preceding  and  is,  perhaps,  formed  by  a  mingling  of 
individualistic  preconceptions  with  a  somewhat  crude  evolutionary  philosophy. 
....  Man  was  a  mere  individual,  mankind  a  mere  aggregation  of  such ;  but 
he  has  gradually  become  socialized,  he  is  progressively  merging  into  a  social 
whole.  Morally  speaking,  the  individual  is  bad,  the  social  the  good,  and  we  must 
push  on  the  work  of  putting  down  the  former  and  bringing  in  the  latter.s 

'  Human  Nature  and  the  Social  Order,  p.  8. 

*  Ibid.,  p.  9.  i  Ibid.,  pp.  11-12.  *Ibid.,  p.  12.  ^  Ibid.,  p.  10. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"    457 

In  contrast  to  this  view  of  the  priority  of  the  individual  in  point 
of  time,  Cooley  asserts  that 

individuality  is  neither  prior  in  time  nor  lower  in  moral  rank  than  sociality; 
but  that  the  two  have  always  existed  side  by  side  as  complementary  aspects  of 
the  same  thing,  and  that  the  line  of  progress  is  from  a  lower  to  a  higher  tj^e 

of  both,  not  from  the  one  to  the  other If  we  go  back  to  a  time  when  the 

state  of  our  remote  ancestors  was  such  that  we  are  not  willing  to  call  it  social, 
then  it  must  have  been  equally  undeserving  to  be  described  as  individual  or 
personal.' 

If  the  person  is  thought  of  primarily  as  a  separate  material  form,  inhabited 
by  thoughts  and  feelings  conceived  by  analogy  to  be  equally  separate,  then  the 
only  way  of  getting  a  society  is  by  adding  on  a  new  principle  of  socialism, 
social  faculty,  altruism,  of  the  hfe.  But  if  you  start  with  the  idea  that  the  social 
person  is  primarily  a  fact  in  the  mind,  and  observe  him  there,  you  find  at  once 
that  he  has  no  existence  apart  from  a  mental  whole  of  which  all  personal  ideas 
are  members,  and  which  is  a  particular  aspect  of  society.' 

The  foregoing  statements  are  sufficient  to  show  the  nature  of 
Cooley's  point  of  view  in  his  approach  to  the  social  problem.  The 
unit  which  he  has  in  mind  is  always  a  group,  of  which  one  may 
take  either  an  indi\ddual  aspect  or  a  total  or  collective  aspect. 
The  group  and  the  individual  are  but  two  phases  of  the  same  or 
total  social  situation.  To  attempt  to  approach  the  study  of  society, 
as  Ward  did  for  instance,  from  the  standpoint  of  the  individual, 
and  then  attempt  to  create  a  social  superstructure  on  the  basis 
of  that  individual  approach  is  an  abstraction  that  the  facts  do  not 
warrant.  From  the  beginning,  according  to  Cooley,  there  must 
have  been  a  group  situation.  It  is  the  fundamental  hypothesis 
upon  which  he  constructs  his  whole  subsequent  thought.  The 
further  points  of  inquiry  which  we  shall  pursue  are  in  reality  but 
amplifications  of  this  fundamental  one,  but  they  will  serve  to  illus- 
trate and  clarify  it  and  will,  to  some  extent,  show  the  process  which 
is  found  to  exist  in  them  all.  We  may  begin  with  the  closely 
related  discussion  of  the  individual  and  social  aspects  of  the  mind 
and  of  the  nature  of  the  mind  in  general. 

In  defining  the  term  mind  in  its  social  and  individual  aspects, 
Cooley  carries  his  synthetic  view,  elaborated  above,  into  every  part 

^  Ibid.,  p.  II. 

'  Ibid.,  pp.  89-90.  Cooley  acknowledges  his  deep  indebtedness  to  both  James  and 
Baldwin  for  the  view  he  holds. 


458  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

of  the  discussion.  To  understand  his  discussion  we  must  discover 
his  definition  of  the  mind.  This  he  gives  in  the  following  words: 
Mind  is  an  organic  whole  made  up  of  co-ordinating  individualities,  in  some- 
what the  same  way  that  the  music  of  an  orchestra  is  made  up  of  divergent  but 
related  sounds.  No  one  would  think  it  necessary  or  reasonable  to  divide  the 
music  into  two  kinds,  that  made  by  the  whole  and  that  of  the  particular 
instruments;  and  no  more  are  there  two  kinds  of  mind,  the  social  mind  and  the 
individual  mind.  When  we  study  the  social  mind  we  merely  fix  our  attention 
on  larger  aspects  and  relations  rather  than  on  the  narrower  one  of  ordinary 
psychology.' 

In  other  words,  the  conception  of  a  separate  and  isolated  individual 
entity,  which  can  be  called  the  mind,  is  an  abstraction  which  has 
no  real  existence.  The  point  will  become  clearer  as  we  go  on  to 
discuss  Cooley's  treatment  of  the  problem  of  consciousness  and  the 
self.  It  will  be  noted  that  the  group  relation  is  kept  consistently 
in  view  throughout. 

Consciousness,  whether  one  is  treating  of  social  consciousness 
or  self-consciousness,  is  invariably  a  product  of  a  group  relation. 
Neither  can  arise  without  the  other. 

Social  consciousness  or  awareness  of  society  is  inseparable  from  self- 
consciousness,  because  we  can  hardly  think  of  ourselves  excepting  mth 
reference  to  a  social  group  of  some  sort,  or  of  the  group  except  vdth. 
reference  to  ourselves.  The  two  things  go  together,  and  what  we  are 
reaUy  aware  of  is  a  more  or  less  complex  personal  or  social  whole,  of  which  now 
the  particular,  now  the  general,  aspect  is  emphasized.  In  general  then  most 
of  our  reflective  consciousness,  of  our  wide-awake  state  of  mind,  is  social  con- 
sciousness, because  a  sense  of  our  relation  to  other  persons,  or  of  other  persons 
to  one  another,  can  hardly  fail  to  be  a  part  of  it.  Self  and  society  are  twin-born, 
we  know  one  as  immediately  as  we  know  the  other,  and  the  notion  of  a  separate 
and  independent  ego  is  an  illusion.  This  view,  which  seems  to  me  quite  simple 
and  in  accord  with  common-sense,  is  not  the  one  most  commonly  held,  for 
psychologists  and  even  sociologists  are  still  much  infected  with  the  idea  that 
self-consciousness  is  in  some  way  primary,  and  antecedent  to  social  conscious- 
ness, which  must  be  derived  by  some  recondite  process  of  combination  or 
eUmination.* 

The  view  here  enunciated  is  so  vitally  a  part  of  all  Cooley's  thinking 
that  it  will  bear  repetition  in  different  forms.  It  would  be  difficult 
to  find  a  more  complete  statement  of  the  growing  view  of  social 

'  Social  Organization,  p.  3. 
» Ibid.,  p.  5. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"    459 

psychology  as  to  the  essentially  social  nature  of  the  individual  and 
of  the  self. 

Cooley  criticizes  Descartes'  well-known  maxim,  Cogito,  ergo  sum, 
upon  the  ground  that  it  is  an  abstraction  of  the  individual  aspect 
of  a  social  situation  and  a  positing  of  that  as  the  primary  fact,  to 
the  neglect  of  the  other  pole  of  the  dialectic.  It  is  "one-sided  or 
'  individualistic'  in  asserting  the  personal  or  '  I '  aspect  to  the  exclu- 
sion of  the  social  or  'we'  aspect,  which  is  equally  original  with  it."* 
Descartes'  error  was  a  result  of  a  too  narrow  introspection.  A 
broader  introspection  reveals  the  fact  "that  the  'I '-consciousness 
does  not  expHcitly  appear  until  the  child  is,  say,  about  two  years 
old,  and  that  when  it  does  appear  it  comes  in  inseparable  conjunc- 
tion with  the  consciousness  of  other  persons  and  of  those  relations 
which  make  up  a  social  group.  "^  In  other  words,  Descartes  lacked 
an  adequate  conception  of  the  group  as  a  fact  in  mental  develop- 
ment. The  consciousness  of  self  implies  the  consciousness  of  others 
and  vice  versa.  "Self  and  society  go  together,  as  phases  of  a  com- 
mon whole.  I  am  aware  of  the  social  groups  in  which  I  Hve  as 
immediately  and  authentically  as  I  am  aware  of  myself."^ 

Closely  connected  with  the  social  nature  of  the  self  and  of 
consciousness,  is  the  problem  of  thought  as  a  social  process. 
Thought,  according  to  Cooley's  explanation,  is  essentially  an  impli- 
cation of  the  group  process.  In  other  words,  thought  is  a  social 
process.  "Our  thoughts  are  always,  in  some  sort,  imaginary 
conversations;  and  when  vividly  felt  they  are  likely  to  become 
quite  distinctly  so."''  Thought  has  grown  up  out  of  the  interrela- 
tions of  living  forms.  Whether  we  view  it  as  it  develops  in  the 
case  of  the  child,  or  in  the  most  highly  developed  t>^e  of  reflection, 
thinking  always  implies  the  other  forms  of  Hfe.  Thought  is  essen- 
tially internal  conversation,  internal  dialogue.  That  is,  it  is  a 
group  product,  and  always  implies  a  group  both  for  its  inception 
and  for  its  development.  It  is  true  of  adults  as  it  is  of  children  that 
"the  mind  Uves  in  perpetual  conversation."  "The  fact  is  that 
language,  developed  by  the  race  through  personal  intercourse  and 

'  Ibid.,  pp.  5-6.  '  Ibid.,  p.  7.  *  Ibid.,  pp.  8-9. 

*  Human  Nature  and  the  Social  Order,  p.  328. 


46o  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

imparted  to  the  individual  in  the  same  way,  can  never  be  dis- 
sociated from  personal  intercourse  in  the  mind;  and  since  higher 
thought  involves  language,  it  is  always  a  kind  of  imaginary  con- 
versation. The  word  and  the  interlocutor  are  correlative  ideas."* 
This  impHcation  of  the  fundamental  relation  of  the  group  to  both 
language  and  thought,  and  the  very  close  relation,  one  might  say 
identity,  between  language  and  thought,  is  one  of  the  most  impor- 
tant implications  of  the  group  concept  which  modern  social  psychol- 
ogy has  developed.  Cooley  has  performed  a  real  service  in  pointing 
out  some  suggestive  ways  in  which  the  problem  may  be  followed  up. 
The  radical  contrast  that  this  view  presents  to  that  of  Ward,  in 
which  thought  was  assumed  to  antedate  group  or  social  life,  is 
quite  apparent.  It  symbolizes  one  of  the  most  important  differ- 
ences in  the  role  of  the  group  concept  and  its  implications.  It 
is  true,  of  course,  that  Cooley  does  not  discover  any  process  whereby 
self-consciousness  arises  and  functions,  nor  does  he  show  the  process 
by  which  the  self  is  created  or  by  which  the  social  product,  language, 
becomes  reflective  thought.  He  does,  however,  by  calling  attention 
to  the  essentially  social  nature  of  self,  language,  and  thought, 
establish  the  basis  for  his  sociological  approach  to  the  problems 
which  he  discusses.  Some  such  presumption,  it  would  seem,  is 
necessary  for  the  founding  of  a  real  claim  for  sociology  as  a  social 
technique. 

Two  very  significant  appUcations  of  the  group  concept  remain 
to  be  pointed  out.  They  constitute  two  very  significant  and  impor- 
tant contributions  to  social  theory  in  general.  They  are  Cooley's 
elaboration  of  the  nature  and  importance  of  "primary  groups"  and 
his  group  or  social  approach  to  the  problem  of  pecuniary  valuation. 
The  meaning  and  significance  of  the  term  "primary  groups"  as 
developed  by  Cooley  are  so  well  recognized  that  it  is  hardly  neces- 
sary to  do  more  than  to  call  attention  to  the  point.  The  impor- 
tance of  the  family,  the  playground,  the  neighborhood  was  not 
unknown  before  his  treatment  of  them,  but  their  real  importance 
could  be  pointed  out  only  on  the  basis  of  an  adequate  social  psy- 
chology. So  long  as  the  self,  the  individual,  was  looked  upon  as  a 
datum  rather  than  as  a  creation  of  social  or  group  life,  the  intimate 

'  Human  Nature  and  the  Social  Order,  p.  56. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"    461 

face-to-face  groups,  while  more  or  less  important  as  secondary 
factors,  could  not  assume  a  primary  role.  Once,  however,  the 
newer  social  psychology  has  taken  upon  itself  to  regard  the  self, 
thought,  and  the  individual  as  products  of  a  group  relation,  then 
the  intimate  associational  groups  become  primary  in  importance. 
In  other  words,  the  significance  of  Cooley's  contribution  in  this 
respect  is  not  in  calling  attention  to  certain  universal  forms  of 
group  Hfe,  but  in  reinterpreting  that  group  life  in  terms  of  a  social 
psychology.  The  degree  to  which  the  local  group  life  is  coming 
to  have  a  recrudescence  of  emphasis  in  various  fields  of  thought  is, 
to  some  extent  at  least,  influenced  by  Cooley's  able  use  of  the  group 
concept  in  this  part  of  his  thinking. 

With  reference  to  the  other  point  mentioned,  the  discussion  of 
the  problem  of  value,  it  is  not  within  the  province  of  this  paper 
to  attempt  to  present  a  resume  of  the  argument  presented.  The 
relevant  point  for  us  is  that,  in  taking  up  the  problem  of  pecuniary 
valuation,  Cooley  approaches  it  from  the  social  point  of  view 
rather  than  from  the  individual  point  of  view  as  is  common  in 
economic  theory.  In  other  words,  it  is  an  effort  to  deal  with  the 
problem  of  pecuniary  valuation  in  particular  from  the  group  point 
of  view.  In  carrying  out  his  purpose,  Cooley  makes  use  of  the 
fundamental  social  psychology  which  runs  through  all  his  work. 
In  doing  this  he  is  making  a  contribution  to  the,  as  yet,  young 
attempt  to  apply  the  group  concept,  the  social  point  of  view,  to 
the  province  of  valuation  in  economic  theory,  which  has  for  so  long 
been  the  preserve  of  the  individualist.  The  usual  treatment  of 
the  problem  in  economic  theory,  according  to  Cooley, 

starts  with  demand  as  a  datum,  assuming  that  each  individual  has  made  up 
his  mind  what  he  wants  and  how  much  he  wants  it.  There  is  seldom,  I  beheve, 
any  serious  attempt  to  go  back  of  this,  it  being  assumed,  apparently,  that  these 
wants  spring  from  the  inscrutable  depths  of  the  private  mind.  At  any  rate 
it  has  not  been  customary  to  recognize  that  they  are  the  expression  of  an 
institutional  development.* 

What  Cooley  attempts  to  do  is  to  go  back  of  these  individual  wants, 
as  found  in  the  individual  minds  of  economic  theory,  and  show 
that  the  minds  themselves,  as  well  as  the  wants  or  demands,  are 

'  Social  Process,  p.  297. 


462  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

socially  created ;  that  the  group  has  formed  and  made  them  as  they 
are.  A  treatment  of  value  which  ignores  this  fundamental  part 
of  the  valuation  process  as  at  best  a  half-truth.  The  market  is  an 
institution  and  as  such  creates  its  values  and  demands,  shapes  the 
types  of  wants  and  tends,  like  any  institution,  to  preserve  itself 
and  its  wants  from  changes  and  modifications.  The  result  of  the 
individualistic  treatment  of  valuation  which  has  been  current  is  to 
saddle  the  whole  institution  of  the  market  on  human  nature: 

The  accepted  economic  treatment  would  seem  to  be  equivalent  to  a  renun- 
ciation of  any  attempt  to  understand  the  relation  of  value  to  society  at  large; 
or,  in  other  words,  of  any  attempt  to  understand  value  itself,  since  to  understand 
a  thing  is  to  perceive  its  more  important  relations.' 

The  truth  of  the  situation  is  that  the  problem  is  a  social  one, 
valuation  is  a  social  process  rather  than  an  individual  one.  The 
market  itself  is  the  main  factor  in  creating  values.  This  does  not 
mean  merely 

that  pre-existing  individual  estimates  are  summed  up  and  equilibrated  in 
accordance  with  the  formulas  of  economic  science;  though  this  is  one  phase 
of  the  matter,  but  also  that  the  individual  estimates  themselves  are  moulded 
by  the  market,  at  first  in  a  general  way  and  then,  in  the  process  of  price  making, 
drawn  toward  mechanical  uniformity.  The  individual  and  the  system  act 
and  react  upon  each  other  until,  in  most  cases,  they  agree,  somewhat  as  in 
fashion,  in  religious  belief  and  the  like.  The  influence  of  the  market  is  not 
secondary  either  in  time  or  importance  to  that  of  the  person;  it  is  a  continuous 
institution  in  which  the  individual  lives  and  which  is  ever  forming  his  ideas. ^ 

From  these  quotations  one  may  see  that  what  Cooley  is  attempting 
to  do  is  to  apply  his  psychology  of  the  relation  of  the  individual 
and  the  group  to  the  particular  social  problem  of  valuation.  It  is 
merely,  by  way  of  summary,  an  application  of  the  newer  social 
psychology  to  the  province  of  economic  theory  in  so  far  as  it  has 
to  do  with  valuation.  We  are  not  concerned  witli  the  further 
details  of  the  application.  It  is  enough  to  point  out  that  the 
overwhelming  number  of  writers  in  political  economic  theory  are 
individualistic  in  their  thinking,  but  that,  in  his  latest  book, 
Cooley  is  attempting  to  proceed  logically  from  the  prevailing  point 
of  view  in  contemporary  social  psychology.  In  a  word,  it  is  an 
effort  to  approach  the  heart  of  economic  theory  from  the  group 

»  Social  Process,  p.  298.  '  Ibid.,  pp.  298-99. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"    463 

standpoint.  That  this  has  not  been  done  with  any  degree  of 
success  by  economists  themselves  is  but  an  illustration  of  the  way 
in  which  sciences  fix  the  attitudes  and  values  of  the  workers  in 
their  respective  fields.^  The  individualistic  prepossessions  which 
were  woven  into  economic  theory  early  in  the  formation  of  eco- 
nomics as  a  separate  science  will  tend  to  survive  long  after  new 
points  of  view  have  become  commonplaces  in  social  psychology. 

Miss  Follett's  book,  The  New  State,  is  the  most  important 
analysis  of  the  group  concept  and  its  significance  for  social  practice 
that  has  recently  appeared.^  Like  some  of  the  other  books  that 
have  been  noted  in  the  discussions  of  this  chapter,  the  group  concept 
forms  such  a  large  part  of  the  text  that  to  attempt  to  show  in  any 
adequate  way  the  details  of  its  treatment  would  involve  a  repetition 
of  almost  the  whole  of  the  work.  The  effort  will  be  confined,  there- 
fore, to  an  attempt  to  select  out  those  parts  of  the  discussion  which 
show  most  clearly  the  prominence  of  the  group  in  the  author's, 
mind,  and  the  uses  to  which  the  concept  is  put.  Such  a  plan 
necessarily  will  do  violence  to  a  book  which  is  so  thoroughly  per- 
meated with  the  group  idea  that  it  merits  bodily  inclusion  in  this 
essay.  We  shall  have  occasion  to  refer  to  it  again  in  the  next 
chapter.^ 

In  order  properly  to  approach  the  point  of  view  with  which 
Miss  Follett  sets  about  her  task,  it  will  be  well  to  inquire  into  the 
psychological  point  of  view  with  which  she  begins.  That  is,  we 
must  find  out  what  is  meant  by  the  "new  psychology  "  as  contrasted 
with  the  discarded  "old  psychology."    The  key  to  the  former  is, 

'  Acknowledgment  should  be  made,  of  course,  of  the  work  of  Anderson  (Social 
Value)  which  attempts  to  reconstruct  economic  theory  from  within  the  ranks  of  the 
economists.  In  general,  however,  the  newer  view  is  still  in  its  infancy.  Cooley's 
contribution  to  this  view  is  the  most  valuable  and  significant  part  of  his  latest  book. 
Social  Process. 

*  Apparently  a  book  in  political  science,  The  New  State  is  so  thoroughly  a  socio- 
logical study  that  it  must  be  included  here,  although  the  steady  policy  has  been  followed 
of  confining  the  discussion  to  writers  who  are  definitely  known  to  be  at  work  in  the 
division  of  labor  called  sociolog>'. 

3  The  outline  for  this  paper  was  completed  before  this  book  came  to  hand.  The 
similarity  in  thought  is  a  coincidence  with  no  causal  relationship. 


464  TEE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

that  it  refuses  to  recognize  the  legitimacy  of  the  separation  of  the 
individual  from  the  group: 

We  have  long  been  trying  to  understand  the  relation  of  the  individual  to 
society;  we  are  only  just  beginning  to  see  that  there  is  no  "individual,"  and 
that  there  is  no  "society."  It  is  not  strange,  therefore,  that  our  efforts  have 
gone  astray,  that  our  thinking  yields  small  returns  for  politics.  The  old 
psychology  was  based  on  the  isolated  individual  as  the  unit,  on  the  assumption 
that  a  man  thinks,  feels,  and  judges  independently.  Now  that  we  know  that 
there  is  no  such  thing  as  a  separate  ego,  that  individuals  are  created  by  recip- 
rocal interplay,  our  whole  study  of  psychology  is  being  transformed.^ 

In  other  words,  the  new  psychology  is  a  social  psychology  which 
recognizes  the  interacting  socii  in  a  total  social  situation  as  the 
unit.  Such  a  psychology  must  be  more  than  an  "application  of 
individual  psychology  to  a  number  of  people."^  The  new  psy- 
chology, on  the,  other  hand,  "must  take  people  with  their  inher- 
itance, their  'tendencies,'  their  environment,  and  then  focus  its 
attention  on  their  interrelatings."^  Again,  we  must  distinguish 
a  proper  social  psychology  from  that  so-called  social  psychology 
which  makes  "socially  minded"  tendencies  on  the  part  of  indi- 
viduals the  subject  of  its  study.  "Such  tendencies  still  belong  to 
the  field  of  individual  psychology."''  "A  social  action  is  not  an 
individual  initiative  with  a  social  appHcation,  neither  is  social 
psychology  the  determination  of  how  far  social  factors  determine 
individual  consciousness.  Social  psychology  must  concern  itself 
primarily  with  the  interaction  of  minds. "^  In  other  words,  it  is 
group  psychology. 

Still  another  distinction  is  to  be  made  between  the  latter  and 
what  has  sometimes  passed  for  group  psychology,  namely,  crowd 
psychology.  "Social  psychology  may  include  both  group  psychol- 
ogy and  crowd  psychology,  but  of  these  two  group  psychology  is 
much  the  more  important."^  This  distinction  between  the  group 
and  the  crowd  is  conceived  to  be  fundamental.  The  crowd  and 
the  group  "represent  entirely  different  modes  of  association." 
"Crowd  action  is  the  outcome  of  agreement  based  on  concurrence 
of  emotion  rather  than  of  thought,  or  if  on  the  latter,  then  on  a 


'  The  New  Stale,  p.  19. 

*  Ibid. 

'  Ibid.,  p.  20. 

ilbid. 

3  Ibid.,  p.  21. 

6  Ibid. 

GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  ''DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY''    465 

concurrence  of  emotion  produced  by  becoming  aware  of  similarities, 
not  by  a  slow  and  gradual  creating  of  unity."*  The  process  by 
which  this  creation  of  unity  is  secured  will  be  explained  later. 
The  point  to  be  noted  here  is  that  a  crowd  psychology,  while  it 
has  received  more  study,  is  to  be  distinguished  from  a  group 
psychology  or  social  psychology  as  used  by  the  author.  The  latter 
is  the  more  important,  not  only  for  present  analysis  of  group  life,  but 
for  a  constructive  program  in  a  democracy.  In  a  word,  the  essence 
of  the  theme  of  the  book  is  that  the  group  process  must  be 
substituted  for  the  "crowd  fallacy."  With  these  preliminary 
remarks  on  the  general  psychological  point  of  view  we  may  pass 
to  other  matters  which  will  serve  to  illustrate  and  ampUfy  the 
suggestions  contained  in  the  foregoing  quotations. 

In  order  to  understand  the  further  references  to  the  group 
as  the  fundamental  concept  with  which  the  book  deals,  it  is 
necessary  to  sketch  briefly  what  is  meant  by  the  term  "the  group 
process"  as  it  is  used.  The  group  process  is  the  heart  of  the  group 
psychology,  and  is  represented  as  the  only  solution  of  the  problem 
of  democracy.  In  its  essence  it  is  a  stimulus-and-response  situation 
in  a  group,  whereby  a  real  group  mind  is  created  out  of  integration 
of  the  attitudes  of  the  co-operating  persons.  This  process  is  not 
one  of  mere  addition  or  subtraction  of  individual  attitudes.  The 
attitudes  are  not  fixed.  The  result  of  group  discussion  and  activity 
is  a  composite  whole  which  is  something  new.  It  is  not  secured 
by  the  acquiescence  of  the  member  of  the  group  but  by  his  contribu- 
tion. It  is  not  compromise  or  a  striking  of  averages.  It  is  not 
suppression  of  one  part  by  the  other  members.  The  group  process 
is  found  only  when  there  is  an  integration  of  differences  and  agree- 
ments into  a  new  whole.  "It  is  an  acting  and  reacting,  a  single 
and  identical  process  which  brings  out  differences  and  integrates 
them  into  a  unity.  The  complex  reciprocal  action,  the  intri- 
cate interweavings  of  the  members  of  the  group,  is  the  social 
process."* 

^Ibid. 

'  Ibid.  The  point  of  view  set  forth  in  this  summary  of  the  author's  analysis  of 
the  group  process  suggests  Cooley's  analysis  of  the  formation  of  public  opinion  (Social 
Organization,  chap,  xii),  and  Aristotle's  still  earlier  statement  of  the  advantages  of 
giving  supreme  power  in  the  state  to  the  many  rather  than  to  the  few  (Politics  iii.  11). 


466  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

In  contrast  to  the  group  process  as  thus  sketched,  two  theories 
of  the  group  process  are  criticized,  namely,  "the  imitation  theory 
and  the  like-response-to-like- stimuH  theory."^  Imitation  is  a  part 
of  our  social  life  but  it  is  only  a  part,  and  a  "part  that  has  been 
fatally  over-emphasized."^  It  has  been  made  the  bridge  to  span 
the  gap  "between  the  individual  and  society,  but  we  now  see  that 
there  is  no  gap,  therefore  no  bridge  is  necessary. "^  The  chief  error 
in  making  imitation  the  basis  of  a  social  psychology  is  that  it 
stresses  likenesses  to  the  neglect  of  the  other  very  important  factor, 
difference: 

The  core  of  the  social  process  is  not  likeness,  but  of  harmonizing  difference 
through  interpenetration.  But  to  be  more  accurate,  similarity  and  difference 
cannot  be  opposed  in  this  external  way — they  have  a  vital  connection.  Simi- 
larities and  differences  make  up  the  differentiated  reactions  of  the  group;  that 
is  what  constitutes  importance,  not  their  likeness  or  unlikeness  as  such.  I  react 
to  a  stimulus;  that  reaction  may  represent  a  likeness  or  an  unlikeness.    Society 

is  the  unity  of  these  differentiated  reactions Unity  is  brought  about 

by  the  reciprocal  adaptings  of  the  reactions  of  individuals,  and  this  reciprocal 
adapting  is  based  on  both  agreement  and  difference.'' 

This  does  not  mean  that  there  is  not  uniformity.  The  distinction 
to  be  made  is  between  uniformity  as  given,  and  the  unity  which 
we  achieve.  Uniformity  means  stagnation.  Similarity  is  a  doc- 
trine of  degeneration.  "Unity,  not  uniformity,  must  be  our  aim. 
We  attain  unity  only  through  variety.  Differences  must  be  inte- 
grated, not  annihilated,  nor  absorbed."^  "The  unifying  of 
difference  is  the  eternal  process  of  life — the  creative  synthesis,  the 
highest  act  of  creation,  the  at-onement."^ 

Closely  connected  with  the  unification  of  thought  through  what 
has  been  described  as  the  group  process  of  integration  is  the  unifica- 
tion of  feeling,  or  "collective"  feehng  as  it  is  called.  It  is  recognized 
by  Miss  Follett  that  the  unification  of  thought  which  she  has 
described  is  only  part  of  the  group  process.  Here  again,  it  is 
pointed  out,  the  older  individuahstic  psychology  is  inadequate  to 
give  a  true  explanation  of  the  origin  and  nature  of  sympathy: 

Particularistic  psychology,  which  gave  us  ego  and  alter,  gave  us  sympathy 
going  across  from  one  isolate  being  to  another.    Now  we  begin  with  the  group. 

» The  New  State,  p.  21.  ^Ibid.  s  Ibid.,  p.  39. 

^Ibid.,  p.  34.  *  Ibid.,  pp.  34-35-  *  J^id-,  p.  40. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"    467 

We  see  in  the  self-unifying  of  the  group  process,  and  all  the  myriad  unfoldings 
involved  the  central  and  all-germinating  activity  of  life.  The  group  creates. 
In  the  group,  we  have  seen,  is  formed  the  collective  idea,  "similarity"  is  there 
achieved,  sympathy  also  is  born  within  the  group — it  springs  forever  from  inter- 
relation. The  emotions  I  feel  when  apart  belong  to  the  phantom  ego;  only 
from  the  group  comes  the  genuine  feeling  with — the  true  sympathy,  the  vital 
sympathy,  the  just  and  balanced  sympathy.* 

We  have  here  an  excellent  statement  of  the  relation  of  the  group 
to  the  feelmg  of  sympathy,  as  well  as  a  clear  conception  of  the 
central  position  of  the  group  as  opposed  to  the  older  separation 
of  one  independent  individual  from  another,  with  the  consequent 
necessity  of  getting  them  together  through  the  invention  of  a  bond 
of  feeling.  The  necessity  of  the  assumption  of  the  priority  of  the 
group  as  the  basis  for  the  appearance  of  sympathy  is  clearly  set 
forth  in  the  following  passage : 

It  has  been  thought  until  recently  by  many  writers  that  sympathy  came 
before  the  social  process.  Evidences  were  collected  among  animals  of  the 
"desire  to  help "  other  members  of  the  same  species  and  the  conclusion  drawn 
that  sympathy  exists  and  that  the  result  is  "mutual  aid."  But  s>Tnpathy 
cannot  antedate  activity.  We  do  not,  however,  now  say  that  there  is  an 
"instinct"  to  help  and  then  sympathy  is  the  result  of  the  helping;  the  feehng 
and  the  activity  are  involved  one  in  the  other.^ 

The  reason  why  we  have  had  difficulties  in  trying  to  find  out  whether 
self-interest  or  love  for  one's  fellows  is  the  chief  motor  force  in 
society  has  been  because  ''we  have  thought  of  egoistic  or  altruistic 
feelings  as  pre-existing;  we  have  studied  action  to  see  what  prece- 
dent characteristics  it  indicated.  But  when  we  begin  to  see  that 
men  possess  no  characteristics  apart  from  the  unifying  process, 
then  it  is  the  process  we  shall  study."^  The  recognition  of  the 
group  life  as  the  center  and  starting-point  for  social  analysis  is 
quite  apparent  from  the  older  views  criticized.  This  emphasis 
which  Miss  Follett  places  upon  activity  as  the  key  to  the  inter- 
pretation of  the  group  process,  is  one  of  the  cardinal  characteristics 
of  functional  psychology.  One  of  the  significant  suggestions,  in  a 
practical  apphcation  of  the  point  of  view  that  has  been  presented, 
is  contained  in  the  following  words: 

This  means  that  we  must  live  the  group  life.  This  is  the  solution  of  our 
problems,  national  and  international.     Employers  and  employed  cannot  be 

*  Ibid.,  p.  44.  '  Ibid.,  p.  45.  J  Ibid. 


468  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

exhorted  to  feel  sympathy  for  one  another;  true  sympathy  will  come  only  by 
creating  a  community  or  group  of  employers  and  employed.  Through  the 
group  you  find  the  details,  the  filling  out  of  Kant's  universal  law.  Kant's 
categorical  imperative  is  general,  it  is  empty;  it  is  only  a  blank  check.  But 
through  the  life  of  the  group  we  learn  the  content  of  universal  law.' 

This  recognition  of  the  importance  of  the  implications  of  the  relation 
of  group  activity  to  the  formation  of  the  feehng  of  sympathy  and 
all  other  moral  qualities  can  hardly  be  exaggerated.  The  empty 
attempts  to  form  moral  character  by  the  repetition  of  moral  pre- 
cepts, which  has  been  the  common  theory  of  educational  and 
religious  leaders  and  institutions,  find  in  the  above  statement  a 
much-needed  corrective.  The  educational  application  of  the  theory 
that  the  group  activity  is  the  center  from  which  education  must 
proceed  will  be  pointed  out  later.  Attention  is  called  to  it  here  to 
show  the  significance  of  the  group  concept  as  a  basis  for  the  analysis 
of  the  feelings  of  sympathy  as  suggested  by  the  passage  last  quoted 
above. 

Although  the  author's  point  of  view  has  been  suggested,  it  will 
be  well  to  take  up  in  some  specific  details  her  conception  of  the 
relation  of  the  individual  to  society.  We  shall  have  occasion  to 
jx)int  out  that  a  distinction  is  made  between  the  old  individualism 
and  the  new  individuaHsm ;  we  shall  take  up  the  former  first  and 
deal  with  it  and  the  category  "society"  at  the  same  time.  The 
key  to  Miss  Follett's  position  is  given  in  these  words:  "A  man  is 
a  point  in  the  social  process  rather  than  a  unit  in  that  process,  a 
point  where  forming  forces  meet  straightway  to  disentangle  them- 
selves and  stream  forth  again.  In  the  language  of  the  day,  'man 
is  at  the  same  time  a  social  factor  and  a  social  product. '  "*  The  sun- 
dering of  the  individual  from  the  larger  whole  is  as  ''artificial  and 
late  an  act  as  the  sundering  of  consciousness  into  subject  and 
object."  The  same  view  of  the  group  as  the  reaUty  is  set  forth 
more  fully  in  the  following  statement  of  it: 

The  individual  is  the  unification  of  a  multiplied  variety  of  reactions.  But 
the  individual  does  not  react  to  society.  The  interplay  constitutes  both  society 
on  the  one  hand  and  individuality  on  the  other;  individuality  and  society 
are  evolving  together  from  this  constant  and  complex  action  and  reaction. 
Or,  more  accurately,  the  relation  of  the  individual  to  society  is  not  action  and 
reaction,  but  infinite  interactions  by  which  both  individual  and  society  are 

'  The  New  State,  p.  60.  '  Ibid.,  p.  60. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY''    469 

forever  a-making;  we  cannot  say,  if  we  would  be  exact,  that  the  individual 
acts  upon  and  is  acted  upon,  because  that  way  of  expressing  it  implies  that  he 
is  a  definite,  given,  finished  entity,  and  would  keep  him  apart  merely  as  an 
agent  of  the  acting  and  being  acted  on.  We  cannot  put  the  individual  on  one 
side  and  society  on  the  other,  we  must  understand  the  complete  interrelation 
of  the  two.     Each  has  no  value,  no  existence  without  the  other.' 

The  above  summary  of  the  view  of  the  relation  of  the  individual 
to  the  group  and  its  condemnation  of  the  older  individualistic 
viewpoint  suggests  the  author's  conception  of  the  "new  individual- 
ism," or  the  proper  and  sound  individualism.  Individualism,  in 
this  latter  sense,  is  a  late  social  product.  It  consists  in  the  develop- 
ment of  the  individual  to  the  highest  power  in  a  collective  or  intense 
group  life.  The  development  of  a  true  social  life  is  not  antagonistic 
to  the  development  of  an  individual,  but  is  a  part  of  the  same 
process.  In  other  words,  the  two  develop  together.  The  new 
view  of  individualism  does  not  destroy  the  individual,  as  has  been 
charged.  Those  who  advocate  the  newer  view  are  giving  "the 
fullest  value  to  the  individual  that  has  ever  been  given,  are  preach- 
ing individual  value  as  the  basis  of  democracy,  individual  affirma- 
tion as  its  process,  and  individual  responsibility  as  its  motor  force.  "^ 
This  conception  of  individualism  suggests  a  criticism  of  the  older 
conception  of  freedom  or  liberty.  That  conception  was  that  the 
"solitary  man  was  the  free  man,  that  the  man  outside  society 
possessed  freedom  but  that  in  society  he  had  to  sacrifice  as  much 
of  his  liberty  as  interfered  with  the  liberty  of  others."^  Such  a 
conception  of  freedom  involves  the  fallacies  of  the  older  psychology 
with  its  assumption  of  the  priority  of  the  individual.  The  true 
idea  of  freedom,  the  argument  runs,  is  found  only  in  that  view 
which  conceives  of  the  individual  and  the  group  developing  together; 
a  man  "gains  his  freedom  through  perfectly  complete  relationship 
because  thereby  he  achieves  his  whole  nature.  "•♦  Freedom  is  found 
in  what  has  been  described  as  the  group  process,  in  the  integration 
process  whereby  a  social  unity  is  created  out  of  differences  and 
agreements.  One  becomes  free  as  one  enters  into  the  intense  social 
life  and  becomes  an  actual  part  of  it : 

That  we  are  free  only  through  the  social  order,  only  as  fast  as  we  identify 
ourselves  with  the  whole,  implies  practically  that  to  gain  our  freedom  we  must 

'  Ibid.,  p.  61.  » Ibid.,  p.  74.  J  Ibid.,  p.  69.  ■•  Ibid. 


470  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

take  part  in  all  the  social  life  around  us;  join  groups,  enter  into  many  social 
relations,  and  begin  to  win  freedom  for  ourselves.  When  we  are  the  group  in 
feeling,  thought  and  will  we  are  free.' 

We  see,  then,  that  the  group  is  the  central  concept  in  the  working 
out  of  the  ideas  of  freedom  and  of  individuahsm.  Freedom  and 
individualism,  in  the  proper  sense  of  the  term,  are  not  opposed 
to  the  group,  but  are  impUed  in  the  group  conception  of  life.  It  is 
only  in  a  group  that  individuality  and  freedom  are  possible.  They 
are  corollaries  of  a  group  conception  of  the  human  process.  Both 
are  achievements. 

Before  leaving  the  discussion  of  the  relation  of  the  individual 
to  the  group  or  to  society,  it  may  be  well  to  notice  briefly  Miss 
Follett's  view  of  the  concept  "society,"  and  her  criticism  of  the 
social-organism  theory.  With  reference  to  the  first,  she  very 
properly  observes  that  there  is  no  such  thing  as  society  en  masse. 
In  that  sense  the  term  is  a  misnomer.  The  reality  is  a  niunber 
of  groups  to  which  one  is  more  or  less  intimately  attached: 

I  am  always  in  relation  not  to  "society,"  but  to  some  concrete  group 

Practically,  "society"  is  for  every  one  of  us  a  number  of  groups.  The  recog- 
nition of  this  constitutes  a  new  step  in  sociology,  analogous  to  the  contribu- 
tion William  James  made  in  regard  to  the  individual The  vital  relation 

of  the  individual  to  the  world  is  through  his  groups;  they  are  the  potent  factors 
in  shaping  our  lives.^ 

In  other  words,  the  study  of  society  becomes  the  study  of  groups. 

With  reference  to  the  organic  conception  of  society.  Miss  Follett 
takes  the  position  that  it  is  inadequate,  although  containing  one 
essential  truth.  That  truth  is  that  it  attempts  to  stress  the  funda- 
mental unity  of  the  thing  it  is  describing.  The  term  is  valuable 
as  a  metaphor  but  is  lacking  in  psychological  accuracy.^  The 
criticisms  made  of  the  analogy  set  forth  nothing  that  has  not  been 
brought  forth  by  other  writers  in  attacking  the  theory.  Most  of 
the  defects  have  been  acknowledged  even  by  the  sponsors  for  the 
theory  in  American  sociolog>^     They  need  not  be  repeated  here. 

In  order  to  bring  out  more  clearly  the  position  of  the  writer 
we  are  now  reviewing,  it  will  be  helpful  to  summarize  the  application 
of  her  view  to  the  theory  of  hmnan  progress.    Two  of  the  older 

'  The  New  Slate,  p.  70.  '  Ibid.,  p.  20.  » Ibid.,  p.  76. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"    471 

theories  of  progress  are  examined;  first,  that  progress  depends  on 
individual  invention  and  crowd  imitation;  and  second,  that  prog- 
ress is  the  result  of  struggle  and  survival  of  the  fittest.  Taking 
up  the  first  of  these  theories,  it  is  pointed  out  that  the  second  half 
of  it  has  been  disposed  of  above  in  connection  with  the  criticism 
of  the  theory  of  imitation  as  the  process  of  social  psychology.  The 
first  half  of  the  theory,  individual  invention,  is  briefly  treated. 
The  individual  does  not  invent  or  originate  in  the  older  sense  of  the 
terms.  The  older  view  committed  the  error  of  ignoring  the  fact 
that  the  individual  is  himself  a  group  product.  Conceding  all  that 
may  be  true  of  inborn  ability,  still,  according  to  Miss  FoUett,  the 
** individual"  idea  one  brings  to  a  given  group  "is  not  really  an 
'individual'  idea;  it  is  the  result  of  the  process  of  interpenetration, 
but  by  bringing  it  to  a  new  group  and  soaking  it  in  that  the  inter- 
penetration becomes  more  complex."^  "There  wells  up  in  the 
individual  a  fountain  of  power,  but  this  fountain  has  risen  under- 
ground, and  is  richly  fed  by  all  the  streams  of  the  common  life."^ 
The  place  of  the  group  in  invention,  though  not  generally  a  part 
of  the  common  thought,  has  been  so  fully  elaborated  by  other 
writers  that  it  is  hardly  necessary  to  suggest  the  soundness  of 
Miss  Follett's  application  of  the  group  view  to  the  invention  theory. 
The  second  theory  of  progress,  struggle  and  survival,  is  subjected 
to  several  criticisms.  In  the  first  place,  it  has  been  placed  upon 
an  individualistic  basis,  pictured  as  a  struggle  between  individuals. 
The  equally  important  fact  of  co-operation  and  group  life  was 
ignored.  Not  only  among  men,  but  in  the  animal  world  as  well, 
"biologists  tell  us  that  'mutual  aid'  has  from  the  first  been  a  strong 
factor  in  evolution,"-'  giving  to  those  animals  which  exhibit  it  an 
advantage  over  the  solitary  type.  Assmning  correction  of  the 
indi\'idualistic  conception  of  struggle,  does  the  conception  of  group 
struggle  suffice  as  an  adequate  process  of  progress  ?  To  this  question 
a  negative  answer  is  given  because  group  struggle  implies  a  subjec- 
tion of  one  group  by  the  other;  it  violates  the  principle  that  progress 
is  achieved  by  the  integration  of  differences,  by  the  extension  of 
membership  in  ever  higher  groups.  Even  if  the  struggle  idea  is 
extended  no  further  than  the  intellectual  world  it  is  invahd,  because 

» Ibid.,  p.  94.  » Ibid.,  p.  95.  3  Ibid. 


472  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

the  true  way  to  progress  is  not  through  argument  or  struggle  but 
through  the  process  of  group  integration  of  differences,  that  is, 
through  what  has  been  called  the ' '  group  process. ' '  True  discussion 
is  not  struggle,  but  "an  experiment  in  co-operation."'  "We  must 
learn  co-operative  thinking,  intellectual  team-work.  There  is  a 
secret  here  which  is  going  to  revolutionize  the  world. "^ 

The  failure  to  take  into  account  the  group  process  is  the  error 
in  both  the  older  notions  of  progress  which  have  just  been  criticized. 
The  true  approach,  according  to  Miss  Follett,  to  an  adequate  theory 
of  progress  is  to  be  found  in  the  group  process:  "Progress  then 
must  be  through  the  group  process.  Progress  impHes  respect  for 
the  creative  process,  not  the  created  thing;  the  created  thing  is 
forever  and  forever  being  left  behind  us."^  Out  of  the  group  life 
alone  comes  the  creative  power.  "No  individual  can  change  the 
disorder  or  the  iniquity  of  this  world.  No  chaotic  mass  of  men  and 
women  can  do  it.  Conscious  group  creation  is  to  be  the  social  and 
political  force  of  the  future.  Our  aun  is  to  live  consciously  in  more 
and  more  group  relations  and  to  make  each  group  a  means  of 
creating.  It  is  the  group  which  will  teach  us  that  we  are  not  pup- 
pets of  fate.""*  Progress,  in  other  words,  is  to  be  secured  by  the 
application  of  the  group  conception  to  our  whole  life.  Thus  will  it 
"revolutionize  the  world." 

Thus  far  in  the  summary,  attention  has  been  directed  to  the 
problem  of  setting  forth  the  fundamental  notions  of  the  writer 
under  discussion,  of  clarifying  the  meaning  of  the  concept  "group," 
and  showing  some  of  its  implications.  From  now  on  it  will  be  well 
to  point  out  some  of  the  ways  in  which  the  group  concept  that  has 
been  developed  may  be  used  in  practical  problems.  Lack  of  space 
necessitates  doing  violence  to  the  constructive  side  of  Miss  Follett's 
discussion.  It  may  be  summarized  in  the  following  words:  "We 
have  said,  'The  people  must  rule.'  We  now  ask,  'How  are  they 
to  rule  ? '  It  is  the  technique  of  democracy  which  we  are  seeking. 
We  shall  find  it  in  group  organization. "^    That  is,  the  "new  state" 

'  The  New  State,  p.  95.  '  Ibid.  ■»  Ibid.,  p.  98. 

*  Ibid.,  p.  loi.  This  statement  gives  the  thesis  of  the  book.  The  new  state 
is  to  arise  out  of  the  recognition  of  the  group  principle  and  its  application,  in  place 
of  the  older  political  theories  based  on  the  older  psychologies. 

5  Ibid.,  p.  155. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"    473 

is  to  be  secured  by  discarding  the  older  conceptions  and  perfecting 
the  organization  of  groups  as  the  only  workable  democratic  method. 
At  the  bottom  of  a  sound  democratic  group  method  is  placed  the 
neighborhood  group.  This  small  "primary"  group,  as  Cooley  calls 
it,  is  the  foundation  stone  upon  which  Miss  Follett  erects  her  edi- 
fice. It  is  here  that,  for  political  purposes,  the  group  process  works 
out.  It  is  here  that  public  opinion  is  formed  and  made  effective. 
It  is  here  that  the  individual  is  discovered  and  conserved  and  en- 
larged. Neighborhood  organization  is  the  destroyer  of  the  boss  and 
the  crowd,  supplanting  them  with  real  leadership  and  a  real  group: 

Neighborhood  organization  must  then  take  the  place  of  party  organization. 
....  The  rigid  formaUty  of  the  party  means  stultification,  annihilation. 
But  group  politics,  made  of  the  very  stuff  of  Ufe,  of  the  people  of  the  groups, 
will  express  the  inner,  intimate  ardent  desires  of  spontaneous  human  beings, 
and  wiU  contain  within  its  circumference  the  possibility  of  the  fullest  satisfac- 
tion of  those  desires.  Group  organization  gives  a  living,  pulsing  unity  made 
up  of  the  minds  and  hearts  and  seasoned  judgments  of  vital  men  and  women.' 

With  the  neighborhood  organized,  Miss  Follett  extends  the  prin- 
ciple of  group  organization  on  up  to  the  highest  groupings  known. 
To  carry  the  principle  of  group  organization  from  "neighborhood 
to  nation' '  there  must  be 

two  changes  in  our  state  first,  the  state  must  be  the  actual  integration  of  living, 
local  groups,  thereby  finding  ways  of  dealing  directly  with  its  individual 
members.  Secondly,  other  groups  than  the  neighborhood  groups  must  be  rep- 
resented in  the  state;  the  ever-increasing  multiple  group  hfe  of  today  must  be 
recognized  and  given  a  responsible  place  in  politics.^ 

As  suggested  by  this  statement.  Miss  Follett  accepts  the  theory 
of  the  unified  state  as  opposed  to  political  pluralism  which  discredits 
the  state.  Her  discussion  of  the  principles  and  inferences  involved 
in  the  different  point  of  view  is  a  very  interesting  elaboration  of 
the  group-process  theory,  but  we  cannot  go  into  it  further  than  to 
point  out  that  she  holds  consistently  to  the  view,  which  seems  to 
be  sound,  that  the  organization  of  larger  and  more  inclusive  groups 
does  not  destroy  the  smaller  groups,  but,  on  the  contrary,  demands 
them  as  essential  to  the  larger  group  organization.  Through  the 
process  of  integration,   it  is  pointed  out,   it  is  possible  to  build 

» Ibid.,  pp.  242-43.  » Ibid.,  p.  245. 


474  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

up  a  group  organization  from  neighborhood  to  nation,  and  even  to 
internation  or  world-organization.  Through  it  all,  however,  the 
group  method  is  the  only  sound  basis  of  modern  pohtical  organiza- 
tion. In  reply  to  the  contention  of  those  who  favor  occupational 
representation  as  the  proper  method  of  representation,  it  is  pointed 
out  that  no  one  group  can  be  chosen  to  the  exclusion  of  all  other 
groups.  Important  as  the  occupational  group  is,  it  does  not  take 
in  the  whole  of  one's  interests.  One  is  a  member  of  many  and 
various  groups  which  must  be  integrated  into  the  true  neighborhood 
group  as  the  fundamental  group  in  pohtical  activity.  ' '  To  sum  up : 
no  one  group  can  enfold  me,  because  of  my  multiple  nature.  This 
is  the  blow  to  the  theory  of  occupational  representation."' 

The  foregoing  brief  summary  has  not  attempted  to  do  more 
than  to  present  the  point  of  view  of  the  author  with  respect  to  the 
group  conception  of  society,  and  to  suggest  the  application  which 
is  made  of  the  concept  once  it  has  been  developed.  The  book 
contains  one  of  the  most  suggestive  applications  of  the  group 
concept  as  a  tool  of  analysis  that  has  appeared.  It  represents 
a  point  of  view  which  sociology  has  had  a  large  share  in  developing; 
a  view  which  is  characteristic  of  contemporary  sociological  thought 
in  this  country. 

[To  be  continued] 

'  The  New  State,  p.  295.  Part  III  and  Part  IV  are  devoted  to  an  elaboration  of 
group  organization  as  the  true  democratic  method.  We  are  not  interested  so  much 
in  the  details  as  in  the  attempt  to  apply  the  group  concept  to  such  an  important  field. 


EDUCATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK 


JESSE  F.  STEINER 
Director  of  Educational  Service,  American  Red  Cross,  Washington,  D.C. 


I.      THE  NATURE   OF   SOCIAL  WORK 

The  term  social  work  which  has  come  to  be  the  accepted  designa- 
tion for  a  large  group  of  specialized  activities  in  the  field  of  social 
betterment  was  not  in  general  use  at  the  opening  of  the  present 
century.  Two  or  three  decades  ago  such  terms  as  philanthropy, 
charity,  correction,  outdoor  rehef,  care  of  dependents,  defectives, 
and  dehnquents,  were  commonly  employed  by  those  at  work  in 
these  fields.  This  is  at  once  evident  in  the  names  of  leading  organi- 
zations estabhshed  during  those  early  years — the  Charity  Organi- 
zation Society,  Association  for  Improving  the  Condition  of  the  Poor, 
National  Conference  of  Charities  and  Correction.  When  Miss 
Mary  E.  Richmond,  in  1897,  made  her  plea  for  professional  training 
she  urged  the  establishment  of  a  "Training  School  in  Applied  Phil- 
anthropy." The  training  class  which  was  organized  in  New  York 
the  following  year  developed  later  into  the  New  York  School  of 
Philanthropy,  and  this  name  persisted  until  very  recently  when  it 
was  changed  to  the  New  York  School  of  Social  Work. 

This  early  terminology  is  significant,  for  it  indicates  clearly  the 
nature  of  the  field  from  which  modern  social  work  has  developed. 
The  social  workers  of  a  generation  ago  were  frankly  engaged  in  the 
work  of  charity  or  philanthropy.  Their  efforts  were  concentrated 
upon  the  disadvantaged  and  handicapped  and  represented  a  grow- 
ing attempt  to  understand  their  problems  and  solve  them  through 
the  application  of  scientific  methods.  Just  because  their  work  was 
permeated  with  the  scientific  spirit  it  was  inevitable  that  their 
attention  should  be  increasingly  directed  to  the  forces  that  were 
dragging  men  down  and  making  the  work  of  relief  such  a  difficult 
task. 

Thus  there  developed  very  naturally  a  keen  interest  in  what  is 
frequently  called  the  preventive  side  of  social  work.    Those  whose 

475 


476  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

work  was  commonly  thought  of  as  being  in  the  field  of  rehef  began 
to  interest  themselves  in  social  legislation  and  in  the  improvement  of 
social  and  industrial  conditions.  From  the  ranks  of  philanthropic 
workers  there  arose  those  who  took  up  the  fight  against  the  adverse 
conditions  of  Hfe  instead  of  in  behalf  of  the  unfortunate  who  were 
disabled  by  those  conditions.  Investigations  of  the  standards  of 
living  and  housing  conditions,  social  surveys  of  various  kinds,  pro- 
motion of  recreational  activities,  organization  of  communities  for  the 
purposes  of  social  betterment,  arousing  pubhc  sentiment  against 
the  evils  of  child  labor,  and  organized  efforts  to  give  the  general 
public  a  social  point  of  view— all  these  and  many  other  activities 
of  a  similar  nature  became  a  recognized  part  of  the  field  of  social 
work. 

This  change  of  emphasis  in  social  work  from  remedial  meas- 
ures to  those  that  strike  at  the  root  of  social  problems  caused 
the  whole  field  under  consideration  to  lose  its  early  definiteness  of 
boundary  lines.  As  long  as  social  work  was  regarded  as  the 
adjustment  of  the  dependent  and  handicapped  to  their  environ- 
ment, its  activities  could  be  grouped  together  in  a  field  that 
was  pecuhar  to  itself.  Just  as  soon,  however,  as  it  attempted  to 
accomplish  its  purpose  by  bringing  about  modifications  of  the  en- 
vironment, it  allied  itself  with  forward  looking  movements  in  many 
lines  of  work.  In  this  sense,  social  work  may  be  regarded  as  almost 
identical  with  the  promotion  of  common  welfare  and  the  social 
worker  is  the  individual  of  any  occupation  or  profession  whose  life 
is  actuated  by  a  definite  social  purpose.  Devine's  Spirit  of  Social 
Work  is  dedicated 

to  social  workers,  that  is  to  say,  to  every  man  and  woman,  who,  in  any  relation 
of  life,  professional,  industrial,  political,  educational  or  domestic;  whether  on 
salary  or  as  a  volunteer;  whether  on  his  own  individual  account  or  as  part  of 
an  organized  movement,  is  working  consciously,  according  to  his  light  intelli- 
gently, and  according  to  his  strength  persistently,  for  the  promotion  of  the 
common  welfare— the  common  welfare  as  distinct  from  that  of  a  party  or  a 
class  or  a  sect  or  a  business  interest  or  a  particular  institution  or  a  family  or 
an  individual. 

It  is  at  once  evident  that  while  such  a  broad  conception  of  social 
work  may  be  logical,  it  leads  us  far  beyond  its  distinctively  tech- 
nical aspects.    An  analogy  may  be  found  in  education  which  has 


EDUCATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK  477 

both  its  popular  and  its  professional  sides.  In  one  sense  a  large 
part  of  our  activities  may  be  looked  upon  as  educational,  but  never- 
theless it  is  well  understood  that  there  is  a  very  clearly  defined 
field  for  those  who  have  to  do  with  formal  education.  Social  work, 
because  it  touches  life  in  so  many  intimate  ways  and  includes 
activities  that  are  commonplace  and  informal  in  nature,  must  have 
its  popular  side  that  can  be  participated  in  by  people  of  every  vo- 
cation. This  is  in  fact  the  purpose  of  that  part  of  social  work  which 
lays  emphasis  upon  the  spread  of  socialized  intelligence.  The 
more  intelligent  people  become  about  social  duties  and  problems, 
the  more  active  will  they  be  in  the  promotion  of  the  common  wel- 
fare. One  of  the  most  hopeful  signs  of  the  times  is  the  active 
interest  of  such  agencies  and  institutions  as  the  school,  the  church, 
chambers  of  commerce,  farmers'  organizations,  etc.,  in  social  pro- 
grams designed  to  bring  about  a  solution  of  social  problems. 

But,  however  legitimate  it  maybe  to  speak  of  social  work  in  this 
broad  sense  as  merging  into  many  different  fields,  there  is  without 
doubt  a  point  beyond  which  popular  effort  cannot  go  and  main- 
tain a  high  efficiency.  It  is  evident,  for  instance,  that  social  inves- 
tigation involves  processes  for  which  is  required  a  technique  of  its 
own.  It  is  even  more  clear  that  technical  equipment  is  needed  to 
deal  with  the  situations  that  arise  in  connection  with  the  care  of  the 
dependent  and  handicapped.  No  one  can  doubt  that  the  adjust- 
ment of  the  social  forces  of  communities  requires  the  sure  touch  of 
a  hand  trained  for  its  task.  These  and  other  similar  activities  in 
the  general  field  of  social  welfare  stand  out  in  a  well-defined  group, 
not  primarily  because  of  what  they  attempt  to  do,  but  because  they 
can  be  carried  on  successfully  only  by  those  who  possess  the  proper 
technical  training  and  experience.  The  social  worker  may  be  work- 
ing hand  in  hand  with  many  people  interested  in  the  same  general 
problems  but  he  is  distinguished  from  them  because  he  is  qualified 
through  special  training  to  accomplish  well  certain  tasks  that  only 
incidentally  come  to  the  attention  of  those  in  other  fields.  Social 
work  defined  in  this  way  loses  something  of  the  indefiniteness  that 
comes  from  its  close  relation  to  efforts  to  improve  the  common 
welfare.  While  its  results  are  accomphshed  through  the  aid  of 
many  allies,  it  has  its  distinctively  technical  aspects  which,  taken 


478  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

together,  form  a  group  of  highly  specialized  activities  that  may 
very  well  be  regarded  as  the  beginning  of  a  new  profession. 

But  the  confusion  in  regard  to  the  proper  limits  of  the  field  of 
social  work  has  not  resulted  entirely  from  its  far-reaching  ten- 
dencies. Complications  also  arise  from  the  domination  of  certain 
types  of  social  work  which  more  or  less  consciously  regard  themselves 
as  occupying  a  fundamental  position  in  the  field  of  social  welfare. 
This  is  especially  true  of  the  Charity  Organization  Society  move- 
ment which  must  be  recognized  as  the  beginning  of  scientific  social 
work  in  this  country  and  which  has  maintained  its  place  of  leader- 
ship ever  since  its  establishment  more  than  a  generation  ago. 
Within  this  movement  has  been  developed  the  technique  of  family 
case-work  which  was  one  of  the  first  examples  of  the  appUcation  of 
scientific  methods  to  social  work.  The  family  welfare  group  have 
long  been  prominent  in  state  and  national  conferences  of  social 
workers,  and  have  made  very  significant  contributions  to  the  litera- 
ture dealing  with  social  problems.  It  is  not  surprising,  therefore, 
that  family  case-work  should  sometimes  be  used  as  synonymous 
with  social  work,  and  that  there  should  be  a  tendency  in  some 
quarters  to  judge  the  standing  of  social  workers  by  training  and 
skill  in  this  particular  field. 

The  natural  confusion  that  results  from  this  point  of  view  can  be 
easily  seen.  Social  work  is  frequently  identified  with  social  pathol- 
ogy in  spite  of  the  efforts,  led  in  many  instances  by  family  case- 
workers themselves,  in  the  wider  fields  of  social  investigation  and 
community  work.  There  is  no  clear  recognition  that  social  work 
has  progressed  to  the  point  where  remedial  work  represents  only 
a  part  of  its  field.  Instead  of  placing  family  case-work  in  its 
legitimate  position  as  one  of  the  most  important  of  the  special 
activities  of  social  work,  there  is  a  tendency  to  continue  to  regard 
it  as  the  center  from  which  all  phases  of  social  work  naturally 
develop. 

A  scientific  interpretation  of  social  work,  upon  which  can  be 
based  an  adequate  plan  for  professional  education,  must  place  in  the 
right  perspective  the  activities  that  make  up  its  technical  field. 
Unquestionably  its  remedial  and  ameUorative  activities  come  first 
in  importance.    The  problem  of  dealing  with  the  subnormal  and 


EDUCATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK  479 

handicapped  presses  upon  us  from  all  sides.  Many  generations  of 
social  neglect,  of  toleration  of  indecent  conditions  of  life,  of  wilful 
choice  of  the  things  that  degrade,  have  produced  their  evil  results. 
The  proper  care  of  dependent  families,  of  orphaned  and  neglected 
children,  of  anti-social  and  subnormal  individuals,  requires  skill,  and 
no  social  worker,  whatever  his  specialized  form  of  work,  dare  be 
ignorant  of  the  technique  needed  in  this  field. 

On  the  other  hand  due  importance  must  be  given  to  methods  of 
social  investigation,  analysis  of  community  life,  construction  of 
community  programs,  the  technique  of  organized  recreation,  and 
problems  of  social  work  administration.  These  are  aspects  of  social 
work  that  are  now  demanding  many  skilled  leaders  and  unfor- 
tunately there  is  no  general  agreement  as  to  the  technique  involved 
or  as  to  the  way  workers  in  these  fields  should  be  prepared.  No 
system  of  education  for  social  work  can  be  regarded  as  adequate 
until  the  methods  of  training  in  social  investigation  and  social 
organization  are  as  carefully  worked  out  as  is  the  technique  of 
instruction  for  the  remedial  side  of  social  work. 


II.   HOW  PREPARATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK  HAS  BEEN  SECURED 

It  is  a  matter  of  common  knowledge  that  the  professional  schools 
of  law,  medicine,  teaching,  and  engineering  began  as  a  supplement 
to  the  apprenticeship  system  which  was  the  original  method  of 
preparation  for  technical  tasks.  The  difl&culties  these  schools  ex- 
perienced in  establishing  themselves  in  competition  with  what  were 
regarded  as  more  practical  methods  of  training  can  be  understood 
without  detailed  reference  to  the  past,  for  in  some  of  these  fields, 
at  least,  the  apprenticeship  system  is  still  an  active  competitor  and 
exerts  a  restraining  influence  upon  efforts  to  raise  standards  of 
professional  education. 

A  study  of  the  methods  of  preparation  for  social  work  shows  no 
exception  to  this  experience  of  the  well-established  professions. 
The  only  difference  worthy  of  mention  is  that  social  work  is  a  more 
recent  development,  and  therefore  the  apprenticeship  system  is  still 
in  vogue  to  an  extent  that  would  hardly  be  permitted  today  in  other 
professions. 


48o  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

The  apprentice  method  as  it  has  been  developed  in  the  social- 
work  field  has  been  simply  a  means  employed  by  organizations  to 
train  their  new  workers.  The  employee  in  training  sometimes  re- 
ceives formal  instruction  from  his  superior  through  assigned  read- 
ings and  conferences,  but  the  training  consists  chiefly  of  practical 
work  carried  on  under  supervision.  Such  an  apprenticeship  there- 
fore cannot  be  called  training  for  social  work  for  it  gives  the  worker 
no  well-rounded  view  of  the  whole  field  but  prepares  him  merely 
for  specific  tasks  within  a  single  organization. 

The  organization  that  conducts  the  training  often  safeguards 
its  own  interests  by  requiring  the  new  worker  to  remain  in  its  em- 
ploy for  a  stated  period  of  time.  In  1898  the  Boston  Associated 
Charities  requested  its  agents  in  training  to  agree  in  advance  to 
remain  for  three  years  in  the  service  of  that  Society.  The  United 
Charities  of  Chicago  in  1915  demanded  a  two-year  period  of  service 
of  those  whom  it  undertook  to  train.  This  rule,  which  was  quite 
generally  followed,  makes  it  clear  that  the  well-established  social 
work  organizations  in  the  larger  cities  have  not  desired  to  accept 
responsibility  for  the  training  of  workers  not  in  their  employ.  In  a 
report  read  at  the  National  Conference  of  Charities  and  Correction 
at  Topeka,  Kansas,  in  1900,  it  was  stated  that 

there  is  but  one  Society  which  is  making  a  special  effort  to  train  agents 
and  secretaries  for  positions  in  newly  organized  societies  and  so  spreading  the 
gospel  of  organized  charities  in  other  cities.  This  has  no  reference  to  the 
New  York  Society  which  is  conducting  an  excellent  six  weeks'  mid-summer 
course  for  those  who  wish  to  take  advanced  work. 

Eight  years  later  Mrs.  John  M.  Glenn  discussed  this  same 
subject  in  a  paper  read  at  the  National  Conference  of  Charities 
and  Correction  in  Richmond,  and  quoted  a  field  secretary  as  follows : 

I  do  not  know  whether  large  societies  feel  a  responsibility  toward  small 
societies  or  not.  The  engagement  of  a  field  secretary  for  Charities  and  the 
Commons  would  seem  to  be  an  indirect  evidence  that  they  do.  I  don't  think 
we  are  ready  to  train  workers  sent  us  from  other  cities,  expecting  them  to  go 
back  to  work  in  other  cities. 

An  apprenticeship  system  that  was  limited  to  the  large  organi- 
zations of  a  few  cities,  and  admitted  to  training  only  a  number 
sufficient  to  take  care  of  their  labor  turnover,  could  never  meet  the 


EDUCATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK  481 

demand  for  trained  workers  in  a  line  of  work  that  was  constantly 
expanding.  The  first  public  evidence  of  recognition  of  this  fact  in 
this  country  was  a  paper  read  by  Miss  Anna  Dawes,  in  1893,  at 
the  International  Congress  of  Charities  in  Chicago.  In  this  paper, 
which  had  as  its  subject  "The  Need  of  Training  Schools  for  a  New 
Profession,"  Miss  Dawes  pointed  out  the  desperate  situation  in 
which  the  Charity  Organization  Society  found  itself  because  new 
societies  were  springing  up  more  rapidly  than  trained  workers  could 
be  supplied.  As  a  result  of  this  lack  of  skilled  leadership  an  undue 
proportion  of  these  organizations  were  either  faihng  utterly  or  were 
carrying  on  their  work  in  a  feeble  and  inefficient  manner.  In  com- 
menting on  this  situation.  Miss  Dawes  said: 

I  am  convinced  that  it  is  not  so  much  lack  of  willing  individuals  as  entire 
lack  of  opportunity  for  training  that  is  the  real  trouble.  For  no  matter  how 
much  a  man  may  wish  to  go  into  this  work  there  is  no  place  where  he  can  learn 

its  duties What  is  needed,  it  seems  to  me,  is  some  course  of  study  where 

an  intelligent  young  person  can  add  to  an  ordinary  education  such  branches 
as  may  be  necessary  for  this  purpose,  with  a  general  view  of  those  special 
studies  in  political  and  social  science  which  are  most  closely  connected  with 
the  problem  of  poverty,  and  where  both  he  and  his  associate  already  learned 
in  the  study  of  books  can  be  taught  what  is  now  the  alphabet  of  charitable 
science — some  knowledge  of  its  underlying  ideas,  its  tried  and  trusted  methods, 
and  some  acquaintance  with  the  various  devices  employed  for  the  upbuilding 
of  the  needy,  so  that  no  philanthropic  undertaking,  from  a  model  tenement 
house  to  a  kindergarten  or  a  sand  heap,  will  be  altogether  strange  to  his  mind. 
....  It  seems  to  me  that  the  time  has  come  when  either  through  a  course 
in  some  established  institution  or  in  an  institution  by  itself,  or  by  the  old- 
fashioned  method  never  yet  improved  upon  for  actual  development — the 
method  of  experimental  training  as  the  personal  assistant  of  some  skilled 
worker — it  ought  to  be  possible  for  those  who  would  take  up  this  work  to  find 
some  place  for  studying  it  as  a  profession ^ 

This  appeal  for  a  training  school  did  not  lead  to  immediate 
action.  However  clearly  a  few  leaders  might  see  the  need  of  trained 
workers,  there  was  very  little  recognition  of  this  need  on  the  part 
of  the  pubUc.  The  ninety-two  charity  organization  societies  in 
existence  at  that  time  represented  an  important  and  growing  move- 
ment, but  they  were  supported  by  a  Umited  cUentele,  and  their 
methods  were  not  fully  understood  or  approved.    Even  when  we 

»  Charities  Review,  III,  49-51. 


482  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

add  to  this  list  of  charity  organization  societies  the  organizations 
that  were  springing  up  in  related  kinds  of  social  work,  the  field  was 
still  too  limited  in  scope  to  offer  many  inducements  to  trained 
workers.  It  must  not  be  forgotten  also  that  the  pubHc  did  not 
regard  philanthropic  work  as  a  technical  activity  that  required 
special  skill  and  so  quite  readily  employed  as  workers  in  this  field 
those  who  lacked  proper  training  and  experience.  This  was  brought 
out  very  strikingly  by  Miss  Mary  E.  Richmond  in  an  address  made 
at  Philadelphia,  in  1897,  in  the  course  of  which  she  cited  the  fol- 
lowing incidents: 

"You  ask  me,"  wrote  a  clergyman,  "what  qualifications  Miss has 

for  the  position  of  agent  in  the  Charity  Organization  Society.  She  is  a  most 
estimable  lady  and  the  sole  support  of  a  widowed  mother.  It  would  be  a  real 
charity  to  give  her  the  place."  Another  applicant  for  the  same  position  when 
asked  whether  she  had  any  experience  in  charity  work,  replied  that  she  had 
had  a  good  deal— she  had  sold  tickets  for  church  fairs.  Though  those  par- 
ticular ladies  were  not  employed,  is  it  not  still  a  very  common  thing  to  find 
charity  agents  who  have  been  engaged  for  no  better  reason? — like  the  one  who 
was  employed  to  distribute  relief  because  he  had  failed  in  the  grocery  business.' 

The  National  Conference  of  Charities  and  Correction,  which  had 
been  bringing  together  the  leading  social  workers  of  the  country  in 
annual  conference  since  1873,  gave  its  first  extended  consideration 
to  the  problem  of  professional  training  at  its  session  in  Toronto  in 
1897.  At  that  meeting  Miss  Richmond  read  a  paper  on  the  sub- 
ject "The  Need  of  a  Training  School  in  Applied  Philanthropy,"  in 
which  she  stated  her  belief  that  professional  standards  could  not  be 
attained  until  a  training  school  had  been  provided.  With  admir- 
able clearness  she  pointed  out  the  confusion  that  existed  because 
the  different  types  of  philanthropic  workers  were  not  familiar  with 
the  common  ground  of  knowledge  that  underhes  all  charitable  work. 
She  says. 

If  an  agent  of  a  relief  society  has  occasion  to  confer  with  the  head  of  a 
foundling  asylum,  is  it  not  likely  that  the  ends  they  have  in  view,  that  the 
prinqiples  underlying  their  work,  that  the  very  meanings  which  they  attach  to 
our  technical  terms,  will  prove  to  be  quite  at  variance?  What  an  incalculable 
gain  to  humanity  when  those  who  are  doctoring  social  diseases  in  many  depart- 
ments of  charitable  work  shall  have  found  a  common  ground  of  agreement  and 

'  Charities  Review  (June,  1897),  p.  308. 


EDUCATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK  483 

be  forced  to  recognize  certain  established  principles  as  xinderlying  all  effectiv 
service!  Not  immediately,  of  course,  but  strongly  and  steadily  such  a  common 
ground  could  be  e^ablished,  I  believe,  by  a  training  school  for  our  professional 
workers. 

Miss  Richmond's  plan  for  the  school  did  not  go  into  details,  but 
included  recommendations  that  it  be  located  in  a  large  city  where 
students  could  have  direct  access  to  the  work  of  public  and  private 
charitable  agencies,  that  its  affiliation  with  an  educational  institu- 
tion should  not  prevent  the  placing  of  emphasis  upon  practical  work 
rather  than  upon  academic  requirements,  and  that  a  considerable 
part  of  the  instruction  be  given  by  specialists  in  the  different  fields 
who  could  be  engaged  to  give  their  lectures  during  the  less  busy 
months  of  the  year. 

At  the  same  meeting  another  plan  was  brought  forward  by 
Miss  Frances  R.  Morse,  which  contemplated  the  development  of 
co-operative  normal-training  by  the  larger  charity  organization 
centers.  In  the  opinion  of  Miss  Morse,  satisfactory  training  could 
be  provided  by  setting  up  a  responsible  group  of  advisers  who 
would  assign  students  in  training  to  different  organizations  for 
definite  periods  and  exercise  general  supervision  over  the  students' 
instruction  so  as  to  make  sure  that  it  would  cover  a  wider  field 
than  that  of  a  single  agency.  It  was  in  fact  a  sort  of  centrally 
directed  apprenticeship  system  whereby  a  new  worker  would  be 
assigned  at  successive  periods  to  different  agencies,  thus  making  it 
possible  to  secure  a  well-rounded  experience. 

Miss  Morse's  plan  did  not  meet  with  general  favor  and  the  time 
did  not  seem  ripe  for  the  establishment  of  a  training  school.  The 
following  year,  however,  in  the  summer  of  1898,  the  New  York 
Charity  Organization  Society  took  the  first  steps  in  the  direction 
of  a  professional  school  by  holding  a  six  weeks'  training  course.  In 
a  lengthy  editorial  on  the  subject,  "A  Training  School  in  Charities 
and  Correction,"  the  Charities  Review  of  May,  1898,  gave  the  fol- 
lowing description  of  the  course  to  be  held  that  summer: 

The  main  feature  of  this  course  is  that  no  tuition  is  charged,  but  members 
of  the  course  are  expected  to  enter  the  service  of  the  society  for  six  weeks. 
District  work,  care  of  one  or  more  families,  investigation  of  special  subjects 
with  one  major  and  one  minor  report  of  the  results  of  such  investigation  are 


484  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

to  be  required.     There  will  be  daily  sessions  for  lectures  and  discussions.     An 
attractive  program  has  been  arranged  under  the  following  general  plan. 

During  the  first  week  the  subject  of  charity  organization  and  general 
philanthropic  work  will  be  considered  with  visits  to  the  offices  in  the  charities 
building,  industrial  agencies  of  New  York  and  Brooklyn,  and  other  private 
charitable  institutions.  The  second  week  will  be  devoted  to  the  care  of 
dependent  and  delinquent  children  and  the  philanthropic  side  of  mission  enter- 
prise. In  the  third  week,  study  will  be  made  of  the  public  charitable  insti- 
tutions with  addresses  from  the  several  superintendents  and  from  the  President 
of  the  Board  of  Charities  Commissioners.  Attention  will  be  given  to  the  work 
of  the  state  Charities  Aid  Association  and  the  state  Board  of  Charities.  The 
fourth  week  will  be  devoted  to  the  study  of  the  care  of  the  dependent  sick. 
Visits  will  be  made  to  various  hospitals,  dispensaries,  etc.  Consideration  will 
be  given  to  the  care  for  the  aged,  and  fresh  air  work.  The  fifth  week  will 
include  some  study  of  general  sanitary  improvements,  the  divisions  of  the 
health  departments  and  visits  to  the  improved  tenements  in  New  York  and 
Brooklyn.  The  first  part  of  the  sixth  week  will  be  given  to  the  care  of  delin- 
quents with  visits  to  the  workhouse  and  penitentiary;  the  second  half  to  a 
review  of  the  work  of  the  class,  with  further  study  into  the  functions  of  charity 
organization  societies  in  developing  the  several  branches  of  philanthropic  and 
reform  work  into  unity  and  precision. 

It  is  not  expected  that  a  thorough  training  will  be  imparted  in  this  period. 
No  diploma  or  degrees  are  to  be  conferred  and  no  promises  made  concerning 
future  employment  of  those  who  avail  themselves  of  the  opportunity  offered. 
As  an  experimental  contribution  toward  the  end  in  view,  the  results  of  the 
present  training  class  will  be  watched  with  interest. 

Dr.  Philip  W.  Ayres  was  placed  in  charge  of  the  training  class 
which  was  attended  by  twenty-seven  students  representing  fourteen 
colleges  and  universities  and  eleven  states.  According  to  the  report 
of  the  New  York  Charity  Organization  Society  for  1897-98,  this 
course  was  carried  on  along  the  Hnes  indicated  in  a  highly  satis- 
factory manner.     The  report  says, 

The  immediate  results  of  this  experimental  course  are  all  that  was  antici- 
pated. Permanent  positions  have  been  secured  by  some,  others  have  gained 
valuable  material  for  the  university  class  room,  while  still  others  have  entered 
upon  special  lines  of  inquiry  which  will  be  prosecuted  in  the  future.  It  is  hoped 
that  from  this  beginning  a  plan  of  professional  training  in  applied  philanthropy 
may  be  developed  which  will  raise  the  standards  of  qualifications  and  of  use- 
fulness throughout  the  entire  field  of  charitable  work. 

This  Summer  School  in  Philanthropic  Work,  as  it  was  called, 
filled  such  a  real  need  that  it  became  for  a  period  of  seven  years  a 


EDUCATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK  485 

regular  feature  of  the  work  of  the  New  York  Charity  Organization 
Society.  Until  the  year  1903,  this  summer  course  represented  prac- 
tically the  only  organized  effort  to  provide  systematic  training  in 
the  philanthropic  field.  As  its  purpose  was  primarily  to  increase 
the  efficiency  of  active  workers,  its  attendance  was  largely  limited 
to  those  who  had  at  least  one  year's  experience  in  social  work.  New 
workers  were  supposed  to  serve  a  period  of  apprenticeship  with  a 
social  agency  before  becoming  eligible  to  register  for  the  course. 
The  desire  for  training  was  so  great  that  it  was  not  difficult  to  secure 
students  of  high  grade.  Two  hundred  and  fifteen  students  were 
enrolled  during  the  period  1898-1904,  an  average  of  thirty  for  each 
session,  which  was  as  large  a  class  as  their  limited  facihties  at  that 
time  made  practicable.  Among  those  who  took  this  six  weeks' 
course  are  many  well-known  teachers  and  specialists  in  the  social- 
work  field.  The  list  of  graduates  includes:  Dr.  U.  G.  Weatherly, 
professor  of  sociology,  University  of  Indiana;  C.  C.  Carstens,  gen- 
eral secretary,  Massachusetts  Society  for  the  Prevention  of  Cruelty 
to  Children;  Kate  H.  Claghorn,  instructor  in  social  research,  New 
York  School  of  Social  Work;  Dr.  Carl  Kelsey,  professor  of  sociology, 
University  of  Pennsylvania;  Dr.  E.  W.  Capen,  professor  of  soci- 
ology, Hartford  Theological  Seminary;  Eugene  T.  Lies,  formerly 
general  superintendent.  United  Charities  of  Chicago;  W.  Frank 
Persons,  formerly  director  general,  CiviKan  Relief,  American  Red 
Cross;  Alexander  M.  Wilson,  formerly  director.  Civilian  Rehef, 
Atlantic  Division,  American  Red  Cross;  Lilhan  Brandt,  formerly 
statistician,  New  York  Charity  Organization  Society;  Mrs.  Alice 
Higgins  Lothrop,  formerly  director.  Civilian  Rehef,  New  England 
Division,  American  Red  Cross;  Paul  U.  Kellogg,  editor  of  Survey; 
Frances  A.  Keller,  well-known  writer  and  authority  on  unemploy- 
ment; Porter  R.  Lee,  director,  New  York  School  of  Social  Work;  and 
Howard  S.  Braucher,  general  secretary  of  Community  Service, 
Incorporated. 

In  1903  the  training  program  of  the  New  York  Charity  Organi- 
zation Society  was  extended  to  include  a  six  months'  winter  session 
which  provided  weekly  lectures  at  a  late  afternoon  hour  so  that  the 
course  would  be  available  for  social  workers  employed  in  the  city. 
One  hundred  and  forty-seven  registered  for  this  course,  but  the 


486  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

attendance  was  irregular  on  account  of  the  heavy  work  of  the 
charitable  societies  caused  by  an  unusually  severe  winter. 

The  following  year  these  experimental  training  classes  developed 
into  the  New  York  School  of  Philanthropy  under  the  direction  of  the 
Committee  on  Philanthropic  Education  of  the  New  York  Charity 
Organization  Society.  The  first  director  of  the  school  was  Dr. 
Edward  T.  Devine,  who  served  in  this  capacity  in  connection  with 
his  duties  as  general  secretary  of  the  New  York  Charity  Organiza- 
tion Society.  A  full  year's  course  of  training  was  established  which 
was  planned  primarily  for  students  without  experience  in  social 
work.  The  first  year  fifty-seven  students  registered,  twelve  of 
whom  completed  the  year's  work  and  received  the  certificate  of 
the  school. 

In  the  fall  of  the  same  year,  1904,  a  similar  school  was  estab- 
lished in  Boston  under  the  title  "School  for  Social  Workers,  Main- 
tained by  Simmons  College  and  Harvard  University."  Its  first 
published  announcement  stated  that  it  was 

a  school  for  the  study  of  charity,  correction,  neighborhood  upUft,  and  kindred 
forms  of  social  service,  whether  under  private  management  or  pubUc  adminis- 
tration. Its  purpose  is  to  give  opportunities  to  men  and  women  to  study  social 
problems  by  practical  methods,  particularly  to  those  who  would  become 
officials  of  institutions  and  agencies  or  would  prepare  themselves  for  service 
as  volunteers  in  this  field  of  work. 

The  school  opened  with  one  classroom  and  a  small  ofl&ce  in 
Hamilton  Place,  Boston,  with  an  enrolment  of  twenty-six  students. 
Dr.  Jeffrey  R.  Brackett,  the  President  of  the  Department  of 
Charities  and  Correction  of  Baltimore,  was  appointed  director 
and  remained  in  active  charge  of  the  school  for  a  period  of  sixteen 
years. 

This  demand  for  trained  social  workers  which  resulted  in  the 
estabHshment  of  these  schools  in  New  York  and  Boston  was  felt 
also  in  other  cities  of  the  country  where  social  work  was  being 
carried  on  aggressively.  In  Chicago  the  movement  to  secure 
trained  workers  was  led  by  Graham  Taylor  of  Chicago  Commons, 
who  took  a  prominent  part  in  the  development  of  the  Chicago 
Institute  of  Social  Science  which  was  established  in  1903  as  a  part 
of  the  Extension  Division  of  the  University  of  Chicago.     In  the 


EDUCATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK  487 

January,  1904,  issue  of  The  Commons  Graham  Taylor  wrote  as 
follows  concerning  this  new  training  course: 

At  the  initiative  of  a  settlement  worker,  heartily  supported  by  the  repre- 
sentatives of  practically  all  the  private  and  public  charity  and  correctional 
institutions  of  the  city,  the  University  of  Chicago  will  furnish  the  great  facilities 
of  its  Extension  Department  for  the  establishment  of  training  centers  and 
correspondence  courses. 

Dr.  Taylor  was  appointed  director  of  the  Institute  which  held  its 
first  sessions  in  the  rooms  of  the  University  College  in  the  Fine  Arts 
Building  on  Michigan  Avenue.  The  students  were  enrolled  chiefly 
from  the  ranks  of  those  employed  by  the  Chicago  social  agencies 
and  institutions.  The  new  training  course  proved  so  successful 
that  the  Russell  Sage  Foundation,  which  was  one  of  the  most  active 
supporters  of  the  movement  to  develop  professional  training  for 
social  work,  enlarged  the  Institute  by  estabhshing  in  1907  a  depart- 
ment of  Research,  with  Juha  C.  Lathrop  and  Sophonisba  P.  Breck- 
inridge in  charge.  The  following  year  the  Trustees  of  Chicago 
Commons  Association,  which  had,  since  1906,  assumed  responsi- 
bility for  the  administrative  expenses  of  the  Institute,  transferred 
the  management  of  the  school  to  a  new  board  organized  for  that 
purpose.  Steps  were  immediately  taken  to  establish  the  school 
on  an  independent  basis  and  it  was  incorporated  in  1908  under  the 
name  of  the  Chicago  School  of  Civics  and  Philanthropy.  The 
object  of  the  school  as  stated  at  that  time  was  "to  promote  through 
instruction,  training,  investigation,  and  pubHcation,  the  efficiency 
of  civic,  philanthropic  and  social  work  and  the  improvement  of 
living  and  working  conditions."  Graham  Taylor  still  continued 
to  hold  his  place  of  leadership  in  the  school  and  had  among 
his  co-workers,  Sophonisba  P.  Breckenridge,  Edith  Abbott  and 
Allen  T.  Bums. 

Still  farther  west,  in  the  city  of  St.  Louis,  this  movement  to 
provide  formal  instruction  in  social  work  appeared  almost  con- 
temporaneously with  its  rise  in  the  eastern  cities.  The  interest  in 
social  work  training  in  St.  Louis  first  found  expression,  in  the 
winter  of  1901-2,  in  a  series  of  round-table  meetings  of  the  workers 
in  the  St.  Louis  Provident  Association  under  the  direction  of  the 
General  Manager,  W.  H.  McClain.     From  this  beginning  there 


488  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

developed  a  series  of  fortnightly  conferences  of  the  social  workers 
in  the  city,  followed  a  little  later  by  fortnightly  public  lectures 
given  by  persons  prominent  in  different  fields  of  social  work. 
Regular  classroom  work  was  not  begun  until  1907,  when  a  course 
was  held  in  the  Y.M.C.A.  building,  for  a  period  of  fiiteen  weeks, 
at  which  twenty- three  regular  students  were  enrolled.  The  first 
full  year's  course  was  begun  in  the  autumn  of  1908.  While  the 
school  was  started  by  the  social  workers  in  the  city  in  order  to 
provide  training  facilities  for  themselves,  it  was  not  developed  on 
an  independent  basis.  Through  the  efforts  of  Professor  C.  A.  Ell- 
wood,  of  the  department  of  sociology  of  the  University  of  Missouri, 
and  Mr.  W.  H.  McClain,  manager  of  the  St.  Louis  Provident 
Association,  the  school  was  in  1906  closely  affiliated  with  the  Uni- 
versity of  Missouri.  In  accordance  with  the  plan  agreed  upon 
Dr.  Thomas  J.  Riley  of  the  department  of  sociology  in  the  uni- 
versity became  the  first  director  of  the  school,  thus  insuring  a 
vital  relationship  with  the  university  in  spite  of  the  latter's  loca- 
tion at  a  considerable  distance  from  St,  Louis.  As  first  organized 
the  school  was  known  as  the  St.  Louis  School  of  Philanthropy, 
In  1909  its  name  was  changed  to  the  St.  Louis  School  of  Social 
Economy,  which  remained  its  title  until  1916  when  it  was  re- 
christened  the  Missouri  School  of  Social  Economy. 

The  success  of  the  schools  of  social  work  in  New  York  and 
Boston  stimulated  the  social  agencies  in  Philadelphia  to  provide  a 
training  course  in  that  city  for  the  training  of  their  own  workers. 
In  1908  a  special  training  class  was  held,  which  was  organized  the 
following  year  as  the  Philadelphia  Training  School  for  Social  Work. 
In  the  1910  report  of  the  Philadelphia  Society  for  Organizing 
Charity,  its  general  secretary.  Porter  R.  Lee,  made  the  following 
statement  in  regard  to  the  origin  of  this  school : 

In  many  ways  the  most  important  step  to  which  the  Society  has  lent  its 
influence  has  been  the  estabhshment  of  the  Philadelphia  Training  School  for 
Social  Work.  Believing  that  it  would  be  a  distinct  service  to  the  community 
to  offer  training  in  social  work  in  Philadelphia  to  Philadelphia  people  who 
might  thereby  be  encouraged  to  remain  in  the  city  for  their  permanent  work, 
the  Children's  Bureau  two  years  ago  established  a  course  of  lectures  on  the 
practical  problems  and  methods  of  social  work,  a  large  number  of  which  were 
given  by  experts  from  outside  the  city.    The  lack  of  opportunities  for  field 


EDUCATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK  489 

work  in  connection  with  the  lectures  and  the  difficulty  of  holding  the  students 
to  definite  requirements  were  obstacles  to  the  success  of  the  plan  as  a  training 
school. 

This  course  has  now  been  expanded  into  a  definitely  organized  school  with 
a  curriculum  providing  for  both  class  work  and  field  work  and  for  definite 
tests  for  graduations.  This  has  been  made  p)ossible  through  the  co-operation 
of  a  large  number  of  the  city's  agencies  for  social  work  of  which  this  Society 
is  one. 

The  enrolment  of  the  school  for  the  first  year  was  fifty-two,. 
Mr.  W.  O.  Easton,  director  of  instruction  of  the  Philadelphia 
Y.M.C.A.,  had  personal  charge  of  the  administration  of  the  school 
in  the  capacity  of  executive  secretary,  during  the  first  few  years 
of  its  existence.  The  teaching  staff  was  composed  of  leading 
specialists  in  social  work  in  that  city.  In  1916  the  school  was 
incorporated  as  the  Pennsylvania  School  for  Social  Service,  and 
under  the  direction  of  Dr.  Bernard  J.  Newman,  and  later  of  Dr. 
Frank  D.  Watson,  developed  an  extensive  course  of  study  designed 
to  prepare  students  for  all  the  more  important  types  of  social  work. 

This  movement  to  develop  training  centers  for  social  work 
made  its  first  ventures  in  the  South  in  1916  with  the  establishment 
of  the  Richmond  School  of  Social  Economy  at  Richmond,  Virginia, 
and  the  Texas  School  of  Civics  and  Philanthropy  at  Houston, 
Texas.  The  former  is  now  known  as  the  Richmond  School  of 
Social  Work  and  Public  Health  and  has  as  its  director,  Dr.  H.  H. 
Hibbs,  Jr.,  under  whose  leadership  the  school  was  organized.  The 
Texas  School  of  Civics  and  Philanthropy,  which  was  organized  by 
the  social  agencies  of  Houston  as  an  independent  school,  was  taken 
over  by  Rice  Institute  in  1918,  when  its  director.  Dr.  Stuart  A. 
Queen,  resigned  to  enter  the  military  service. 

These  seven  schools  fall  very  conveniently  into  one  group,  not 
merely  because  they  represent  similar  methods  of  instruction,  but 
because  they  are  to  a  large  extent  the  outcome  of  the  efforts  of 
social  workers  to  provide  training  facilities  and  have  been  built  up 
in  accordance  with  the  ideals  of  practical  workers  rather  than  with 
those  of  university  teachers.  The  schools  in  this  group  are  usually 
spoken  of  as  the  independent  schools,  to  distinguish  them  from  the 
departments  and  schools  of  social  work  that  have  been  established 
within  recent  years  by  colleges  and  universities.    As  a  matter  of 


49©  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

fact,  only  one  of  these  seven  schools  enjoys  the  distinction  of  having 
been  entirely  free  from  academic  connections  during  its  entire 
history. 

The  New  York  School  of  Social  Work  has  from  its  earliest  be- 
ginnings been  under  the  direction  of  the  Charity  Organization  So- 
ciety of  New  York  and  affihated  with  Columbia  University.  In  a 
communication  of  John  S.  Kennedy  to  the  president  of  the  New 
York  Charity  Organization  Society  in  October,  1904,  notifying 
them  of  his  gift  to  that  organization  of  securities  yielding  an  annual 
income  of  $10,000  for  this  new  school,  he  said: 

I  have  also  considered  the  possible  desirability  of  establishing  the  School 
as  a  department  of  some  university,  but  have  decided  it  should  preferably  be 
connected  directly  with  the  practical  charity  work  of  the  city  in  analogy 
rather  to  training  schools  for  nurses  which  are  connected  with  hospitals,  than 
to  any  separate  university  department. 

He  desired,  however,  the  school  to  be  affiliated  with  Columbia 
University  and  arranged  for  the  president  of  the  university  to  be  a 
member  of  the  committee  in  charge  of  the  school.  What  this 
affiliation  with  Columbia  involved  is  stated  in  the  Handbook  of  the 
New  York  School  of  Philanthropy  for  the  year  1905-6  as  follows: 

The  students  of  the  School  of  Philanthropy  are  admitted  to  any  course  in 
Columbia  for  which  they  may  be  qualified  without  charge  of  tuition  fees,  the 
selection  of  courses  being  subject  in  each  instance  to  the  approval  of  the 
Director  of  the  School  and  of  the  instructor  in  the  University  whose  course  is 
chosen.  Students  of  Columbia  University  are  given  reciprocal  privileges  in 
the  School  of  Philanthropy  and  the  work  of  the  School  is  accepted  by  the 
University  as  the  equivalent  of  one  minor  subject  for  an  advanced  degree. 

During  the  early  years  of  the  school's  existence  this  affiliation 
was  strengthened  by  the  fact  that  Dr.  Edward  T.  Devine  and  Dr. 
Samuel  M.  Lindsay,  the  first  directors  of  the  school,  were  also  mem- 
bers of  the  faculty  of  Columbia  University.  Within  the  past  two 
years  the  relation  of  the  school  to  the  university  has  been  modified 
by  a  discontinuance  of  the  plan  of  reciprocal  fee  privileges. 

The  School  for  Social  Workers  in  Boston  was  organized  in 
response  to  the  requests  of  the  social  workers  in  that  city,  but 
was  from  the  first  maintained  by  Simmons  College  and  Harvard 
University.    Later  the  connection  with  Harvard  was  discontinued 


EDUCATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK  491 

and  at  present  this  school  is  conducted  as  a  regular  department  of 
Simmons  College. 

The  Chicago  School  of  Civics  and  Philanthropy  grew  out  of  the 
Chicago  Institute  of  Social  Science  which  was  conducted  under  the 
auspices  of  the  Extension  Department  of  the  University  of  Chicago. 
In  1908  the  school  became  an  independent  corporation  and  main- 
tained that  status  until  1920,  when  its  work  was  taken  over  by 
the  University  of  Chicago. 

The  Missouri  School  of  Social  Economy  was  afl&liated  with  the 
University  of  Missouri  at  the  time  of  its  first  organization.  In 
1909  this  affiliation  was  transferred  to  Washington  University  at 
St.  Louis  and  the  school  was  conducted  as  one  of  the  University  de- 
partments until  1915,  when  the  University  severed  its  relationship 
with  the  school  because  of  the  withdrawal  of  the  financial  support 
of  the  Russell  Sage  Foundation.  For  one  year  the  school  was  con- 
ducted as  an  independent  enterprise  and  then  was  taken  over  by 
the  University  of  Missouri  which  still  conducts  it  under  the  direc- 
tion of  its  Extension  Department. 

The  Pennsylvania  School  for  Social  Service  has  maintained  its 
independent  status  from  its  first  organization  until  the  present 
time.  The  Richmond  School  of  Social  Work  and  Public  Health  was 
established  independently,  but  in  1920  was  affiliated  with  William 
and  Mary  College. 

While  all  but  one  of  these  schools  have  had  at  some  time  in 
their  history,  college  or  university  connections,  none  of  their  affilia- 
tions, prior  to  the  transfer  of  the  Chicago  School  to  the  University 
of  Chicago,  has  been  of  such  a  nature  that  the  university  has  had 
an  active  part  in  determining  the  policies  and  standards  of  the 
professional  school.  These  schools,  whatever  their  academic  affilia- 
tions, have  been  largely  under  the  control  of  social  workers  and 
throughout  their  whole  development  have  laid  their  emphasis  upon 
practical  training  for  specific  kinds  of  social  work. 

Another  characteristic  of  this  group  of  professional  schools  is  the 
striking  similarity  in  their  curricula  and  methods  of  instruction. 
The  terminology  used  in  the  announcement  of  courses  may  vary  in 
different  schools  but  there  is  Httle  variation  in  the  field  they 
attempt  to  cover.    During  the  first  years  of  the  New  York  School  of 


492  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

Philanthropy,  its  courses  of  instruction  were  arranged  under  the  fol- 
lowing groups:  (1)  survey  of  the  field,  principles,  theories  and 
methods  of  general  appKcation;  (2)  the  state  in  relation  to  charity; 
(3)  racial  traits  in  the  population;  (4)  constructive  social  work;  (5) 
the  care  of  needy  famihes  in  their  homes;  (6)  child-helping  agencies; 
(7)  treatment  of  the  criminal.  In  the  announcement  of  the  Boston 
School  in  1905,  the  topics  included  in  the  course  of  studies  were  (1) 
aim  of  social  service;  (2)  improvement  of  general  conditions  of  liv- 
ing; (3)  neighborhood  improvement  in  city  and  country;  (4)  scope 
of  charity;  (5)  the  needy  family;  (6)  persons  out  of  their  own  fami- 
lies; (7)  the  criminal.  At  about  the  same  time  the  Chicago  school 
announced  courses  in  (1)  introduction  to  the  study  of  philanthropic 
and  social  work;  (2)  personal,  institutional,  and  pubhc  effort  for 
dependents;  (3)  preoccupying  and  preventive  poHcy,  agencies,  and 
methods. 

The  course  of  study  during  those  early  years  was  centered  around 
the  problem  of  poverty  and  methods  of  work  with  the  handicapped 
and  dependent.  This  was  still  further  emphasized  by  the  require- 
ment of  field  work  which  was  carried  on  largely  under  the  direction 
of  agencies  doing  case-work  with  families.  This  emphasis,  which 
may  now  seem  somewhat  one-sided,  was  then  entirely  natural  and 
proper  because  the  students'  best  opportunities  for  employment 
were  in  the  case-work  field,  and  few  other  agencies  were  prepared 
to  give  field  work  training  of  any  value.  This  situation,  which 
influenced  the  early  development  of  these  schools,  still  persists, 
although  to  a  lesser  degree.  We  are  not  surprised  therefore  to 
find  that  while  the  courses  of  study  have  been  widened  to  include 
social  investigation,  community  organization,  industrial  welfare, 
mental  hygiene,  etc.,  the  plan  of  field-work  training  has  experienced 
great  difiiculty  in  keeping  pace  with  all  the  newer  developments 
in  the  field  of  social  work.  However  much  this  group  of  profes- 
sional schools  may  differ  as  to  particular  courses  they  otTer,  they 
find  a  common  bond  of  agreement  in  their  emphasis  upon  their 
case-work  departments  and  in  their  insistence  that  case-work  must 
form  a  very  considerable  part  of  the  training  of  all  their  students, 
no  matter  in  which  field  they  intend  to  specialize. 


EDUCATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK  493 

It  thus  appears  that  professional  training  for  social  work  owes 
its  origin  and  early  development  to  the  initiative  of  groups  of  social 
workers  rather  than  to  any  leadership  given  to  it  by  the  universities. 
Even  in  those  instances  where  university  affihations  were  made, 
the  movement  was  led  by  the  social  workers  and  the  curriculum 
was  shaped  to  meet  the  needs  of  social  agencies  rather  than  made 
to  conform  to  the  usual  requirements  of  a  graduate  school.  It  is 
difl&cult  to  conceive  how  this  could  have  been  otherwise  when  we 
recall  that  at  the  time  of  the  establishment  of  the  first  summer 
course  in  New  York  for  philanthropic  workers,  sociology  had  made 
a  very  small  beginning  as  a  university  study,  and  that  for  the  next 
ten  or  fifteen  years  sociologists  were  occupied  so  largely  with  debates 
about  method,  that  their  work  seemed  very  remote  from  the 
problems  in  which  social  workers  were  interested. 

Nevertheless  the  sociologists  were  not  altogether  indifferent  to 
their  opportunities  in  the  practical  field  and  in  some  instances  took 
active  steps  to  correlate  their  work  with  that  of  social  agencies. 
One  of  the  earliest  efforts  of  this  kind  was  a  co-operative  plan  of 
study  worked  out  in  1894  between  the  University  of  Wisconsin 
and  the  Associated  Charities  of  Cincinnati.  As  a  result  of  a  series 
of  lectures  given  the  preceding  year  at  the  University  of  Wisconsin 
by  Dr.  P.  W.  Ayers,  secretary  of  the  Cincinnati  Associated  Chari- 
ties, and  another  series  given  at  Cincinnati  by  Dr.  Richard  T,  Ely, 
of  the  University  of  Wisconsin,  on  "Socialism  and  Social  Reform," 
two  scholarships  in  the  University  of  Wisconsin  in  practical  soci- 
ology were  established  which  entitled  the  holders  to  spend  the 
summer  vacation  in  Cincinnati  in  practical  social  work  under  the 
direction  of  Dr.  Ayers.  These  two  scholarship  holders  were  joined 
the  first  summer  by  eight  other  college  students  interested  in  social 
science  and  formed  probably  the  first  group  of  college  students 
supplementing  their  university  studies  by  supervised  field  work  with 
social  agencies.  Mr.  C.  M.  Hubbard,  writing  in  the  Charities  Review 
of  December,  1894,  called  attention  to  the  fact  that  this  experi- 
ment demonstrated  the  value  to  universities  of  this  type  of  labora- 
tory work.  The  arrangement,  however,  proved  to  be  only  a 
temporary  one,  and  did  not  lead  at  that  time  to  the  establishment 


494  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

of  regular  courses  of  instruction  in  applied  sociology  at  the  Uni- 
versity of  Wisconsin. 

Another  effort  to  bring  about  a  vital  relation  between  the  study 
of  sociology  and  the  work  of  social  agencies  was  made  during  that 
same  year  (1894)  by  the  new  School  of  Sociology  established  in 
connection  with  the  Hartford  Theological  Seminary.  This  school 
planned  a  three-year  course  leading  to  the  degree  of  Bachelor  of 
Sociology.  Specialists  from  the  field  of  social  work  were  brought 
in  as  lecturers  and  the  course  included  practical  field  work  with 
social  agencies. 

As  early  as  1893,  the  University  of  Chicago  announced  courses 
in  practical  sociology  to  be  given  by  Professor  C.  R.  Henderson, 
which,  if  properly  correlated  with  field  work,  would  have  afforded 
perhaps  the  best  opportunity  for  social  work  training  to  be  found 
at  that  time. 

One  of  the  first  significant  efforts  in  the  university  field  to  give 
the  courses  in  practical  sociology  a  vocational  trend  was  made  in 
1910  by  Dr.  J.  E.  Hagerty,  Professor  of  Economics  and  Sociology 
at  Ohio  State  University.  In  a  bulletin  issued  that  year  by  the 
university  announcing  courses  for  the  training  of  students  in  busi- 
ness administration  and  social  science,  the  following  statement  was 
made: 

The  Social  Science  group  of  courses  has  been  arranged  for  the  training  of 
professional  and  volunteer  social  workers.  The  state  of  Ohio  has  thousands 
of  paid  and  volunteer  social  workers,  most  of  whom  are  untrained  for  their 
work.  If  it  is  the  duty  of  the  state  university  to  train  its  students  for  efficient 
citizenship,  it  should  offer  facilities  for  the  trainmg  of  professional  and  volun- 
teer social  workers.  The  new  ideas  of  philanthropy,  if  put  in  practice,  would 
reduce  the  number  of  dependents  and  criminals,  and  make  more  efficient  the 
state  and  county  institutions  and  the  private  charities. 

The  curriculum,  which  was  primarily  designed  for  the  last 
two  years  of  the  undergraduate  course,  included  such  subjects  as 
charities,  criminology,  accounting,  psychology,  labor  organization, 
labor  legislation,  races,  poverty  and  preventive  philanthropy, 
animal  psychology,  abnormal  psychology,  folk  psychology,  a 
seminar  in  social  research,  and  field  work  under  supervision  run- 
ning throughout  the  last  year.  The  university  had  already  been 
conducting  courses  in  applied  sociology  for  a  period  of  five  years 


EDUCATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK  495 

and  was  well  equipped  to  give  the  required  instruction  in  this 
field. 

This  training  course  differed  from  the  usual  courses  offered  by 
the  independent  schools  of  social  work  in  that  it  was  planned  to 
fit  into  the  undergraduate  curriculum,  laid  a  great  deal  of  emphasis 
upon  knowledge  of  fundamental  subjects,  and  did  not  give  the 
customary  amount  of  time  to  field  work  experience.  The  demand 
for  training  of  this  kind  was  sufficient  to  justify  its  continuance, 
and  in  1916  social  service  training  became  a  regular  activity  of  the 
newly  organized  College  of  Commerce  and  Journalism.  This  move- 
ment at  Ohio  State  University  was  in  a  measure  typical  of  what 
was  undertaken  in  a  few  other  colleges  and  universities,  but  in 
general  the  technical  courses  in  applied  sociology  offered  by  uni- 
versities prior  to  the  world-war  could  not  be  regarded  as  con- 
stituting much  more  than  an  excellent  background  for  professional 
study. 

The  need  of  active  university  participation  in  education  for 
social  work  was  set  forth  in  a  striking  manner  by  Professor  Felix 
Frankfurter  of  the  Harvard  Law  School  at  the  National  Conference 
of  Charities  and  Correction  at  Baltimore  in  1915.  After  pointing 
out  the  successive  steps  in  the  development  of  medical  and  legal 
education  in  this  country,  Dr.  Frankfurter  said: 

I  submit  that  what  has  been  found  necessary  for  adequate  training  for 
those  social  activities  which  we  call  the  profession  of  law  and  medicine,  is 
needed  for  the  very  definite,  if  undefined,  profession  we  call  social  work.  I 
can  not  beUeve  that  the  preliminary  training  of  a  lawyer,  most  of  his  life  spent 
in  the  adjustment  of  controversies  between  individuals,  requires  less  of  a 
background,  less  of  an  understanding  of  what  has  gone  before  in  life,  less 
of  a  rigorous  critical  discipline,  than  is  needed  by  those  of  you  who  go  out  to 
pass  judgment  on  the  social  conditions  of  whole  communities;  by  those  of  you 
who  administer  laws  like  the  minimum-wage  laws,  and  the  other  social  legis- 
lation now  administered  in  great  numbers  by  social  workers.  Secondly,  I  can 
not  beUeve  that  a  training  fit  to  discipline  people  who  shall  guide  and  deal  with 
the  social  forces  of  the  day,  can  be  done  in  less  time  than  the  time  found 
necessary  for  the  training  of  lawyers.  Thirdly,  I  can  not  believe  that  the 
experience  of  medicine  and  law  as  to  the  quality  of  teachers  to  train  men  in 
those  professions,  applies  less  in  regard  to  teachers  of  social  work.  I  beheve 
social  workers,  to  reach  the  professional  level,  must  be  guided  by  teachers  who 
give  their  whole  time  and  thought  to  it.     The  time  has  gone  by  when  the 


496  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

teaching  of  any  profession  can  be  entrusted  to  persons  who  from  their  exacting 
outside  work  of  practice  or  administration,  give  to  teaching  their  tired  leavings. 
Finally,  and  at  the  center  of  it  all,  is  complete  association  with  a  university. 
The  schools  for  social  work  have  sprung  up,  of  course,  in  our  large  industrial 
cities.  Is  not  their  evolution  destined  to  become  an  integral  part  of  the  uni- 
versities in  those  cities  to  which  they  are  now,  in  most  cases,  somewhat  platoni- 
cally  attached?  For  the  university  is  the  workshop  of  our  democracy.  If  it 
is  not  that,  it  has  no  excuse  for  being.  The  university  should  be  the  laboratory 
of  this  great  new  mass  of  scientific  and  social  facts,  and  the  co-ordinator  of  these 
facts  for  legislation,  for  administration,  for  courts,  for  public  opinion.  The 
nineteenth  century  necessarily  was  a  period  of  specialization,  even  over- 
speciaUzation.  Our  task  is  to  unify  and  correct  the  partial  facts  of  the  all  too 
scattered  social  sciences.  Mr.  Flexner  truly  pictured  the  character  of  social 
work  in  showing  its  close  interrelation  with  medicine  and  law,  and  sanitation, 
and  the  other  applied  social  sciences.  In  a  scattered  way  these  professional 
studies  are  now  pursued  by  the  university.  The  function  of  the  university, 
however,  is  to  accommodate  these  various  social  sciences,  to  unite  in  a  whole 
all  these  facts  of  life.  The  schools  for  social  work  must  be  intimate  parts  of 
the  university,  because  they  must  have  contact  with  the  other  branches  of  the 
university's  work.  I  suspect  that  by  a  careful  scheme  of  co-ordination  our 
great  universities  could  establish  schools  of  applied  social  science  with  very 
little  addition  to  their  existing  plant  or  personnel.  These  schools  need  the 
iiniversity.  But  the  university  needs  the  school  for  social  work.  Just  as 
the  medical  school  can  not  do  its  job  well  without  a  connected  hospital,  so  the 
medical  school,  and  the  law  school,  and  other  branches  of  the  university,  need 
the  experience  and  the  experimentation  which  a  school  for  social  work  should 
produce.  These  various  aspects,  necessarily  specializations  of  one  common 
endeavor,  should  be  parts  of  a  single  intellectual  community. 

At  the  time  when  this  statement  was  made,  only  a  few  of  the 
universities  were  at  all  conscious  of  the  important  ser^ace  they 
could  render  in  this  field  of  professional  education.  The  social 
workers  on  their  part  were  not  inchned  to  urge  universities  to 
develop  their  curricula  in  this  direction.  As  a  matter  of  fact,  the 
behef  was  quite  generally  held  among  social  workers  that  training 
could  be  given  much  more  advantageously  in  an  independent  school 
unhampered  by  academic  traditions.  The  university  courses,  it 
was  felt,  would  give  an  inadequate  place  to  field  work  and  would 
turn  out  theorists  instead  of  persons  equipped  along  practical 
lines. 

Without  doubt,  the  prevailing  type  of  instruction  in  university 
departments  of  sociology  gave  considerable  ground  for  the  attitude 


EDUCATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK  497 

of  the  social  workers.  Graduate  students  in  sociology  preparing 
for  teaching  positions  were  seldom  required  to  supplement  their 
university  instruction  with  clinical  experience  in  the  social  work 
field.  Their  acquaintance  with  social  agencies  was  usually  Umited 
to  what  could  be  gained  through  observational  visits  or  assignment 
for  research  based  on  the  data  available  in  their  files.  It  was  not 
uncommon  for  sociologists  equipped  in  this  way  to  underestimate 
what  is  involved  in  learning  the  technique  of  social  work.  Their 
attitude  toward  the  social  agency  was  not  similar  to  that  of  the 
medical  instructor  toward  the  hospital  cKnic.  They  were  not 
accustomed  to  regard  participation  in  the  work  of  a  social  agency 
as  a  valuable  means  of  acquiring  scientific  knowledge  of  social 
problems. 

To  the  extent  that  the  foregoing  justly  characterized  the  usual 
attitude  of  sociological  instructors,  it  is  clear  that  they  were  not 
fitted  for  leadership  in  training  for  social  work.  But  \yhat  must 
not  be  overlooked  was  the  growing  tendency  in  all  the  social 
sciences  toward  active  participation  in  practical  affairs.  The 
psychologists  and  economists  as  well  as  the  sociologists  were  rapidly 
making  a  place  for  themselves  outside  their  customary  academic 
roles. 

Undoubtedly  this  movement  which  had  been  gaining  momentum 
for  a  considerable  time  was  greatly  accelerated  during  the  world- 
war.  Men  in  academic  positions  suddenly  found  themselves 
called  upon  to  aid  in  organizing  and  conducting  the  network  of 
industrial  and  social  agencies  that  sprang  into  activity  because  of 
the  military  situation.  The  experience  gained  in  this  way  could  not 
fail  to  have  a  profound  effect  upon  their  attitude  toward  practical 
work. 

Moreover,  the  experience  of  the  universities  in  modifying  their 
courses  of  study  so  as  to  provide  practical  training  along  Hues  of 
war  work  must  not  be  forgotten.  Of  special  significance  for  depart- 
ments of  sociology  were  the  emergency  training  courses  in  home 
service,  which  these  departments  were  asked  to  give  in  co-operation 
with  the  American  Red  Cross.  These  training  courses  were  held 
during  and  immediately  following  the  war  in  fifteen  universities 
where,  previously,  practical  training  for  social  work  had  not  been 


498  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

undertaken.  In  order  that  these  courses  might  be  as  nearly  as 
possible  uniform  in  quahty  and  content,  the  Red  Cross  outlined 
the  subject-matter,  prescribed  the  standards  of  the  course,  supple- 
mented the  teaching  personnel  of  the  university  and  usually  as- 
sumed responsibility  for  the  field  work  of  the  students.  Through 
these  home  service  institutes  there  was  demonstrated  the  need  of 
training  faciUties  for  social  work  in  wide  sections  of  the  country 
where  schools  of  that  kind  had  not  existed.  By  actual  experience 
the  university  men  who  participated  in  these  courses  came  to  a 
proper  appreciation  of  the  requirements  in  this  field  of  professional 
education.  Without  doubt  the  efforts  of  the  Red  Cross  to  estabhsh 
these  training  courses  were  an  important  factor  in  stimulating  the 
interest  of  universities  in  education  for  social  work. 

At  the  time  of  the  organization  of  the  Association  of  Training 
Schools  for  Professional  Social  Work  in  1919,  it  was  found  that  nine 
colleges  and  universities  were  doing  work  of  a  sufficiently  high  grade 
in  this  field  to  warrant  their  enrolment  as  members  of  this  Associa- 
tion. This  list  comprised  Bryn  Mawr  College,  Carnegie  Institute  of 
Technology,  Smith  College,  University  of  Chicago,  University  of 
Minnesota,  Ohio  State  University,  University  of  Pittsburgh,  Univer- 
sity of  Toronto,  and  Western  Reserve  University.  This  group  by 
no  means  includes  all  the  colleges  and  universities  now  actively  at 
work  in  this  field.  Other  institutions  that  are  offering  this  year  pro- 
fessional courses  in  social  work  are  the  following:  Berea  College, 
Kentucky,  University  of  California,  Harvard  University,  Johns 
Hopkins  University,  University  of  Indiana,  University  of  North 
Carolina,  University  of  Oklahoma,  University  of  Oregon,  Uni- 
versity of  Washington,  McGill  University,  Tulane  University,  and 
University  of  Wisconsin.  In  addition  to  these,  brief  training 
courses  were  given  during  the  past  year  in  Cornell  University,  New 
Jersey  State  College  of  Agriculture,  University  of  West  Virginia, 
University  of  Virginia,  Converse  College,  University  of  Kentucky, 
University  of  Iowa,  University  of  Texas,  University  of  Colorado, 
Syracuse  University, University  of  Nebraska, University  of  Missouri, 
and  Iowa  State  College  of  Agriculture. 

While  the  experience  of  these  institutions  in  this  field  of  pro- 
fessional education  has  covered  a  very  brief  period,   there  are 


EDUCATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK  499 

already  evident  certain  outstanding  tendencies  that  are  exercising 
a  profound  influence  upon  methods  of  education  for  social  work. 

In  the  first  place  their  curriculum  is  built  up  to  meet  the  needs 
of  college  students  and  graduates.  The  usual  university  standards 
of  admission  discourage  the  attendance  of  those  whose  qualifications 
are  based  on  practical  experience  rather  than  upon  attainments 
along  academic  Hnes.  Students  with  inadequate  academic  prepara- 
tion may  gain  admission  as  special  students  but  their  inability  to 
get  university  credit  tends  to  restrict  attendance  to  people  of  college 
grade.  It  is  reasonable  to  expect  that  the  university  schools  of 
social  work  will  follow  the  example  of  the  older  professional  schools 
in  the  universities  and  gradually  raise  the  entrance  requirements 
until  students  ineligible  to  work  for  a  degree  will  be  denied  ad- 
mission. 

A  second  characteristic  of  their  work  is  their  insistence  on  pre- 
requisite studies  in  the  social  sciences  as  a  basis  for  professional 
instruction.  This  of  course  does  not  represent  so  much  a  new 
departure  as  a  change  of  emphasis.  The  older  schools  of  social  work 
have  always  recognized  the  value  of  knowledge  of  the  social  sciences, 
but  with  few  exceptions  they  have  not  insisted  upon  a  thorough- 
going study  in  this  field  as  preliminary  to  a  professional  course. 
The  attitude  of  the  universities,  on  the  other  hand,  is  seen  in  their 
attempt  to  build  up  a  four  or  five-year  course  in  which  students 
would,  from  the  beginning  of  their  undergraduate  work,  specialize 
in  the  social  sciences. 

Again  a  majority  of  the  university  schools  of  social  work  have 
given  chief  emphasis  to  courses  in  small  town  and  rural  community 
problems.  The  universities  have  been  stimulated  to  enter  this 
field  of  community  organization  largely  because  of  the  recent  wide- 
spread demand  on  the  part  of  the  Red  Cross  for  community  workers. 
The  location  also  of  many  of  these  university  schools  in  compara- 
tively small  towns  has  made  it  natural  for  them  to  study  the  social 
problems  nearest  at  hand.  At  present  courses  in  community 
studies,  community  organization,  recreation,  and  similar  courses 
dealing  with  preventive  and  constructive  rather  than  remedial  social 
work,  are  receiving  increasing  attention  in  most  of  the  universities' 
schools  of  social  work. 


500  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

In  order  to  provide  suitable  field  work  for  these  courses  dealing 
with  small  town  and  open  country  problems,  it  has  been  necessary 
to  depart  widely  from  the  usual  methods.  Instead  of  turning 
students  over  to  a  well-equipped  agency  for  practical  training,  it 
has  been  necessary  to  give  them  much  of  their  experience  in  com- 
munities where  social  work  had  not  been  well  organized.  Family 
case-work  has  not  been  neglected  but  in  adapting  its  methods  to 
small  towns  and  rural  situations,  the  university  schools  of  social 
work  have  faced  a  difficult  problem.  Of  equal  importance  with 
this  family  work  is  field  work  with  communities  and  with  groups 
within  these  communities.  This  involves  experience  in  com- 
munity studies,  development  of  community  programs,  community 
recreation,  and  the  building  up  of  a  public  interest  in  social  prob- 
lems. The  university  schools  of  social  work  located  in  small  towns 
have  had  to  concentrate  their  efforts  on  the  development  of  training 
facilities  in  unorganized  communities,  instead  of  relying  upon  social 
agencies  to  provide  practical  training  for  their  students. 

The  colleges  and  universities  therefore  have  not  only  entered 
the  field  of  education  for  social  work  but  are  already  beginning  to 
place  their  stamp  upon  standards  and  methods  of  instruction.  At 
least  twenty-one  colleges  and  universities  in  this  country  and  in 
Canada  have  definitely  undertaken  to  develop  schools  of  social 
work  as  a  reguJar  part  of  their  activities.  The  effect  of  this  in 
taking  the  control  of  instruction  in  social  work  away  from  the 
practical  workers  and  placing  it  in  the  hands  of  educational  special- 
ists is  already  being  seen. 

ni.      THE  PROPER  BASIS   OF  EDUCATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK 

The  history  of  professional  education  reveals  a  long  struggle  to 
determine  the  proper  basis  upon  which  technical  instruction  should 
build.  As  long  as  professional  standards  were  low  and  of  httle 
influence,  not  much  importance  was  attached  to  the  problem  of  the 
proper  relationship  of  general  to  professional  education.  During 
the  early  stages  of  the  development  of  professional  schools  of  law, 
education,  and  medicine,  the  student  entered  upon  his  professional 
studies  without  very  serious  consideration  of  his  previous  prepara- 
tion for  that  particular  field. 


EDUCATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK  501 

Within  recent  years  marked  changes  have  occurred  in  the  stand- 
ards of  admission  to  professional  schools.  In  1904  there  were  only 
four  medical  schools  in  this  country  that  required  any  college  work 
for  admission;  in  1917  the  number  that  required  one  or  two  years 
of  such  work  had  increased  to  eighty-three,  which  was  92  per  cent 
of  the  total  number  of  medical  schools.  This  same  tendency  to 
lay  greater  stress  upon  a  high  standard  of  general  education  char- 
acterizes also  the  schools  of  law,  education,  and  engineering.  The 
inadvisability  of  specialization  without  a  broad  foundation  is  now 
generally  recognized.  In  all  the  well-established  professions  it  is 
taken  for  granted  that  general  culture,  breadth  of  view,  and  a 
common  knowledge  of  fundamental  subjects  must  go  along  with 
technical  skill  and  knowledge,  if  high  professional  standing  is  to  be 
attained. 

But  even  more  significant  is  the  growing  insistence  upon  pre- 
professional  studies  as  a  prerequisite  to  vocational  courses.  A 
general  education  as  represented  by  a  high-school  or  college  course 
has  a  varying  content  and  therefore  cannot  be  regarded  as  pos- 
sessing uniform  value  as  a  preparation  for  the  professional  schools. 
Each  profession  has  its  fundamental  sciences  upon  which  its  tech- 
nical instruction  must  be  based.  The  student  of  medicine  is  soon 
out  of  his  depth  imless  he  is  well  grounded  in  biology  and  chemistry 
and  is  familiar  with  the  laboratory  technique  of  the  natural  sciences. 
The  engineering  student's  task  is  hopeless  without  an  adequate 
knowledge  of  mathematics  and  physics.  The  legal  student  should 
bring  to  his  professional  studies  a  mind  well-informed  along  lines 
of  poKtical  and  economic  science.  The  instructor  in  a  school  of 
education  ought  to  be  able  to  take  for  granted  that  his  students  are 
famihar  with  the  principles  of  psychology  and  sociology. 

As  a  matter  of  fact  there  is  as  yet  no  uniform  agreement  on  the 
part  of  these  professions  as  to  the  amount  and  quality  of  the  strictly 
preprofessional  studies  that  should  be  made  a  requirement  of  ad- 
mission to  their  professional  schools.  The  schools  of  medicine  and 
engineering  which  must  look  to  the  natural  sciences  as  a  basis  for 
their  work,  have,  as  might  be  expected,  taken  the  greatest  strides 
forward  in  their  insistence  upon  prerequisite  studies.  On  the  other 
hand  the  professions  that  find  their  basis  in  the  broad  field  of  the 


502  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

social  sciences  find  difficulty  in  setting  up  similar  standards  for 
prerequisites  in  that  field.  Social  science  from  its  very  nature 
cannot  be  as  exact  as  natural  science  and  seems  less  indispensable 
perhaps  because  it  is  so  intimately  connected  with  facts  and  prin- 
ciples that  are  more  or  less  matters  of  common  knowledge. 

But  in  spite  of  the  lack  of  uniform  insistence  by  all  the  pro- 
fessions on  prerequisite  studies  the  tendency  in  that  direction  is 
clear  and  its  correctness  unquestioned.  Professional  schools  can- 
not attain  a  high  standard  unless  they  can  assume  that  their 
students  are  properly  equipped  for  technical  instruction.  The  best 
medical  schools  recognize  this  by  their  encouragement  of  pre- 
medical  courses  designed  for  the  college  student  who  desires  a  college 
degree,  and  at  the  same  time  is  endeavoring  to  prepare  himself  for 
the  study  of  medicine.  While  it  may  be  a  long  time  before  pro- 
fessional schools  are  placed  on  a  thoroughgoing  graduate  basis,  the 
nature  of  their  task  and  the  increasing  demands  that  are  made  upon 
them  are  steadily  raising  their  standards  of  admission. 

In  the  newer  field  of  professional  education  for  social  work 
efforts  to  approximate  the  standards  set  up  by  the  best  professional 
schools  have  been  hampered  by  the  undeveloped  state  of  social 
work  itself  and  by  the  failure  of  the  public  to  appreciate  the  value 
of  thoroughly  trained  workers.  Much  more  than  in  other  profes- 
sions the  apprenticeship  system  of  training  for  social  work  is  an 
active  competitor  with  the  professional  school.  Such  a  large  num- 
ber of  people  still  find  employment  in  social  work  without  the 
technical  equipment  that  a  professional  school  is  expected  to  furnish 
that  insistence  upon  high  standards  of  professional  education  does 
not  yet  seem  very  practicable.  For  this  reason  professional  schools 
of  social  work  have  usually  followed  the  custom  of  admitting  stu- 
dents to  their  courses  without  rigid  insistence  upon  academic 
requirements.  Even  though  high  standards  of  admission  may  seem- 
ingly be  set  up,  these  are  Ukely  to  be  offset  by  qualifying  phrases 
or  alternatives  which  result  in  the  admission  of  any  student  who 
would  be  passed  upon  favorably  by  a  social  agency  seeking  an  ap- 
prentice worker. 

That  this  is  not  an  overstatement  seems  evident  from  the  pub- 
lished statements  of  the  entrance  requirements  of  the  professional 


EDUCATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK  503 

schools  of  social  work.  The  New  York  School  of  Social  Work, 
which  stands  among  the  first  in  its  teaching  equipment  and  high 
standards  of  work,  states  that 

the  standard  of  instruction  is  that  of  a  graduate  school.  A  college  edu- 
cation, therefore,  or  equivalent  preparation  is  essential  in  order  to  do  the  work 
of  the  school  satisfactorily  and  profitably.  Familiarity  with  the  following 
subjects  is  recommended  as  a  foundation  for  the  course:  Economics,  Biology, 
History  (Industrial  and  Social),  Psychology  and  Political  Science. 

The  School  for  Social  Workers  in  Boston  requires  its  applicants 
to  have  had  either  a  college  education  or  a  high-school  education 
supplemented  by  sufficient  subsequent  experience.  Their  Bulletin 
states : 

As  a  desirable  preparation  for  the  school  and  social  work,  students  in  col- 
leges are  advised  to  study  the  following  subjects:  physiology  bearing  on 
hygiene,  psychology,  economics,  the  structure  of  society,  the  family,  state  and 
local  government,  one  laboratory  course  in  science. 

The  Chicago  School  of  Civics  and  Philanthropy  gave  in  its  last 
Bulletin  the  following  as  its  entrance  requirements: 

All  candidates  for  admission  must  have  a  general  education  equivalent  to 
that  of  a  good  secondary  school  and  in  addition,  either,  (a)  must  have  taken  a 
considerable  part  of  a  college  or  vmiversity  course,  or  {b)  must  have  shown 
ability  in  practical  work.  Satisfactory  evidence  of  good  health,  good  character, 
capacity  for  practical  work  and  earnestness  of  endeavor  must  be  presented. 

Students  who  are  graduates  of  colleges  and  universities  of  recognized 
standing  will  be  admitted  to  the  regular  second  year  courses  of  the  School  as 
candidates  for  the  diploma  of  the  School.  Such  students  must,  however,  show 
during  the  first  quarter  of  the  School,  ability  to  do  work  of  a  high  grade. 
Otherwise  they  will  be  required  with  the  opening  of  the  second  quarter  to 
register  in  the  first  year  courses. 

The  first  year  course  is  offered  to  meet  the  need  of  a  large  group  of  persons 
who  wish  training  for  social  work,  but  who  have  not  had  the  advantage  of  the 
pre-professional  courses  now  offered  in  colleges  and  universities.  It  is  assumed 
that  those  who  complete  satisfactorily  this  introductory  course  will  remain  a 
second  year.  To  those  who  remain  and  complete  a  curriculum  composed  of 
second  year  courses  arranged  by  the  Registrar  and  approved  by  the  Dean,  a 
certificate  of  the  School  wiU  be  granted. 

Mature  persons  who  have  had  practical  experience  testing  in  some  measure 
their  fitness  for  social  work,  trained  nurses,  teachers,  church  workers,  and 
others  who  feel  that  it  is  too  late  for  them  now  to  undertake  college  or  univer- 
sity work,  will  be  admitted  to  this  introductory  course.    Younger  persons 


504  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

applying  for  admission  are  advised  to  prepare  themselves  for  the  second  year 
at  a  good  college  or  university. 

In  the  Bulletin  of  the  Pennsylvania  School  for  Social  Service  it  is 
stated  that 

candidates  for  admission  to  the  School  must  have  sufficient  intelligence 
and  maturity  to  deal  with  social  problems.  They  must  be  able  to  express 
themselves  in  oral  and  written  EngUsh.  They  must  also  have  studied  sys- 
tematically some  of  those  branches  on  which  a  knowledge  of  society  is  based, 
such  as  history,  economics,  biology,  psychology  and  sociology.  Some  labora- 
tory training  is  deemed  essential  to  insure  a  scientific  approach  to  social 
problems. 

The  Missouri  School  of  Social  Economy  states  that  its  candi- 
dates for  admission  must  fulfill  one  of  the  following  requirements: 

(1)  The  completion  of  a  college  course.  (2)  Graduation  from  a  recognized 
secondary  school.  (3)  Definite  social  service  experience  in  which  they  have 
shown  special  aptitude.  Among  the  general  subjects  in  which  proficiency  is 
desirable  are  economics,  sociology,  psychology  and  English. 

The  Richmond  School  of  Social  Work  and  Public  Health  re- 
quires a  high-school  education  or  its  equivalent  for  admission  to  its 
courses. 

The  standards  of  admission  as  quoted  above  indicate  the  unwill- 
ingness of  these  schools  to  place  themselves  on  a  thoroughgoing 
graduate  basis.  Even  if  it  is  granted,  as  they  maintain,  that  their 
standard  of  instruction  is  that  of  a  graduate  school,  students  are 
admitted  to  their  courses  who  according  to  the  usual  tests  would 
not  be  eligible  for  graduate  work.  The  Pennsylvania  school  makes 
no  academic  requirements  that  can  be  definitely  measured  in  terms 
of  secondary  school  or  college  work.  The  Missouri  school  gives 
three  alternatives  arranged  in  descending  scale  from  the  point  of 
view  of  academic  standards. 

The  Chicago  school  opened  its  first-year  course  to  those  who 
have  a  general  education  equivalent  to  that  of  a  secondary  school, 
while  college  graduates  were  admitted  at  once  to  their  second-year 
courses.  The  Richmond  school  sets  up  a  similar  standard  with  the 
exception  that  the  way  is  left  open  for  mature  persons  of  practical 
experience  to  enter  the  second-year  course  along  with  college  gradu- 
ates.    The  New  York  school  modifies  its  requirements  of  a  college 


EDUCATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK  505 

education  with  the  statement  that  it  will  accept  "equivalent  prepa- 
ration" the  nature  of  which  is  not  defined.  The  Boston  school 
sets  up  practically  the  same  alternative  but  defines  its  "equiva- 
lent" to  mean  secondary  school  education  supplemented  by  prac- 
tical experience. 

When  these  entrance  requirements  ?re  subjected  to  another  test 
of  a  graduate  school,  namely,  insistence  upon  preprofessional  studies 
that  would  give  the  students  a  knowledge  of  the  sciences  related  to 
their  field  of  work,  an  equally  unsatisfactory  showing  is  made.  In 
general  the  value  of  preliminary  instruction  in  the  social  sciences  is 
recognized  but  such  instruction  is  not  made  an  absolute  require- 
ment. In  their  references  to  these  subjects  the  Bulletins  usually 
adopt  such  phrases  as  "famiHarity  is  recommended"  or  a  "desira- 
ble preparation,"  instead  of  a  recognizing  that  technical  instruction 
in  social  work  must  be  based  on  a  knowledge  of  the  social  sciences. 
Even  the  Pennsylvania  school,  which  requires  candidates  to  have 
"studied  systematically  some  of  these  branches  on  which  a  knowl- 
edge of  society  is  based,"  does  not  enforce  this  rigidly,  for  it  offers  a 
course  called  "Scientific  Bases  of  Social  Work"  which  is  intended 
"to  provide  a  background  of  certain  fundamental  concepts  in  biol- 
ogy, psycholog}^,  economics,  and  sociology  for  those  who  have  not 
had  these  subjects  in  college." 

The  Richmond  school  makes  no  reference  at  all  to  the  desir- 
abihty  of  knowledge  of  the  social  sciences.  It  is  worthy  of  mention 
that  the  New  York,  Boston,  and  Chicago  schools  do  not  include 
sociology  in  the  list  of  studies  mentioned  as  desirable  preparation 
for  their  training  courses. 

Lack  of  uniform  agreement  in  standards  of  admission  is  found 
also  in  the  departments  of  social  work  maintained  by  the  nine 
colleges  and  universities  that  have  membership  in  the  Association  of 
Training  Schools  for  Professional  Social  Work,  but  in  the  case  of  these 
institutions,  the  differences  are  of  another  nature.  These  colleges 
and  universities  may  be  conveniently  divided  into  two  groups,  each 
representing  a  distinct  point  of  view  in  its  methods  of  providing 
professional  training.  The  first  group  includes  the  institutions  that 
place  their  departments  of  social  work  on  a  graduate  basis  and 
limit  attendance  to  those  who  hold  a  bachelor's  degree.     Strong 


5o6  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

emphasis  is  placed  on  the  satisfactory  completion  of  undergraduate 
courses  in  the  social  sciences  and  in  most  cases  such  courses  are  an 
absolute  requirement  for  admission  to  the  technical  courses  of  in- 
struction. This  group  includes  Bryn  Mawr  College,  Smith  College, 
Western  Reserve  University,  and  University  of  Toronto. 

In  the  second  group  are  those  institutions  that  place  their  chief 
emphasis  upon  a  four-year  undergraduate  course  of  instruction  in 
social  work  leading  to  a  Bachelor's  degree.  A  year  or  more  of 
graduate  work  is  also  provided  but  even  this,  it  is  urged,  should 
follow  the  specialized  undergraduate  course  instead  of  being  re- 
garded as  giving  adequate  professional  training  to  any  college 
graduate.  It  is  obvious  that  the  requirements  of  a  secondary-school 
education  for  admission  to  a  four-year  undergraduate  course  spe- 
cializing in  preparation  for  social  work  cannot  be  compared  with  a 
similar  requirement  for  admission  to  a  so-called  graduate  school  of 
social  work.  The  institutions  that  make  up  this  group  are  the 
University  of  Chicago,  University  of  Minnesota,  Ohio  State  Uni- 
versity, University  of  Pittsburgh,  and  the  Carnegie  Institute  of 
Technology. 

The  foregoing  analysis  of  the  present  actual  basis  of  education 
for  social  work  as  is  shown  by  the  standards  of  admission  of  pro- 
fessional schools  indicates  the  wide  divergence  of  opinion  among 
those  at  work  in  this  field.  It  reveals  on  the  one  hand  the  tendency 
of  the  independent  schools  to  distrust  the  value  of  college  courses 
in  the  social  sciences  and  to  make  concessions  to  candidates  for  ad- 
mission who  have  had  approved  kinds  of  practical  experience.  On 
the  other  hand  the  movement  in  the  universities  to  set  up  a  course 
of  instruction  that  would  begin  early  in  the  undergraduate  school 
and  cover  a  period  of  four  to  five  years,  has  grown  out  of  their 
feehng  that  the  social-work  student  needs  a  more  thorough  founda- 
tion in  the  social  sciences  than  is  usually  obtained  in  the  college 
course. 

In  the  field  of  education  for  social  work  we  find  therefore  not 
merely  varying  standards  of  admission  to  the  professional  schools 
but  important  differences  in  regard  to  what  should  constitute  the 
basis  of  their  technical  instruction.  Should  a  college  education  be 
made  a  requirement  of  admission  to  a  school  of  social  work  regard- 


EDUCATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK  507 

less  of  the  subjects  included  in  the  college  course?  In  view  of  the 
varying  content  of  the  subject-matter  of  the  courses  in  the  social 
sciences  in  different  institutions,  as  well  as  the  differences  in  the 
quality  of  instruction,  is  it  practicable  at  the  present  time  to  set  up 
a  high  standard  of  attainment  in  these  sciences  as  a  prerequisite  to 
a  professional  school?  Since  social  work  from  its  very  nature  makes 
such  heavy  demands  upon  soundness  of  judgment,  strong  person- 
ality, and  practical  experience,  should  not  factors  of  this  kind  rather 
than  academic  requirements  be  given  chief  consideration?  Is  it 
wise  at  this  stage  of  development  of  social  work  to  set  up  academic 
standards  of  admission  to  professional  schools  that  cannot  be  at- 
tained by  many  who  otherwise  seem  admirably  fitted  to  become 
useful  social  workers? 

It  is  of  help  in  trying  to  answer  these  questions  to  remind  our- 
selves that  the  heart  of  the  difficulty  lies,  in  the  last  analysis,  in  the 
chaotic  state  of  social  work  itself.  As  long  as  there  is  in  the  wide 
field  of  social  work  no  professional  organization  that  concerns  itself 
with  standards  and  gives  real  unity  to  the  profession  it  is  to  be  ex- 
pected that  each  type  of  social  work  will  set  up  its  own  standards 
based  upon  its  own  experience  and  point  of  view.  In  such  a  stage 
of  development  of  social  work,  science  has  no  assured  place.  Scien- 
tific studies  seem  far  removed  from  practical  work  and  therefore  any 
alHance  with  them  that  places  restrictions  upon  the  entrance  to 
social  work  is  regarded  as  inconsistent  with  its  proper  development. 
It  is  nothing  more  or  less  than  the  age-long  misunderstanding  be- 
tween the  practical  worker  and  the  man  of  science.  The  former 
was  first  in  the  field  and  is  incKned  to  regard  the  scientist  as  an 
intruder  until  science  has  outstripped  practice  and  gained  the  right 
of  leadership. 

In  the  medical  profession  the  confusion  between  medical  prac- 
tice and  medical  science  existed  until  the  latter  was  able  in  com- 
paratively recent  years  to  demonstrate  its  proper  place  in  the 
determination  of  professional  standards.  While  the  social  sciences 
have  not  advanced  as  far  as  the  natural  sciences  they  are  sufficiently 
well  developed  to  justify  their  claim  that  they  must  be  taken  into 
account  in  efforts  to  solve  social  problems.  Any  difference  of  opin- 
ion about  this  must  be  regarded  as  due  to  ignorance  of  the  present 


5o8  TEE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

status  of  the  social  sciences  or  failure  to  appreciate  the  place  of 
science  in  modern  progress. 

If  technical  instruction  in  social  work  is  to  be  based  on  the 
social  sciences,  what  is  the  extent  of  the  foundation  that  should  be 
required?  Certainly  the  minimum  requirement  would  seem  to  be 
the  usual  undergraduate  courses  in  sociology,  economics,  history, 
political  science,  psychology,  and  biolog>^  It  is  difficult  to  see  how 
anything  less  could  give  the  student  a  scientific  equipment  com- 
parable to  that  which  is  expected  of  the  medical  student.  In  the 
four-year  undergraduate  course  in  social  work  offered  by  several  of 
the  universities  this  equipment  in  social  sciences  comes  as  a  matter 
of  course.  The  graduate  schools  of  social  work,  however,  will  not 
fiind  it  easy  to  require  their  candidates  for  admission  to  be  thor- 
oughly famihar  with  the  social  sciences.  Taking  the  country  as  a 
whole  the  majority  of  those  seeking  training  in  social  work  are 
deficient  in  these  subjects.  Maybe  the  graduate  schools  could 
meet  the  situation  by  establishing  a  preHminary  year  for  the  benefit 
of  students  who  need  a  better  foundation  for  their  technical  studies, 
A  better  solution  perhaps  would  be  to  increase  the  number  of 
universities  that  give  an  undergraduate  course  in  social  work.  The 
graduate  schools  then  could  maintain  a  real  graduate  status  and 
would  no  longer  need  to  give  their  attention  to  elementary  courses 
of  instruction. 

During  a  period  of  adjustment  it  might  be  necessary  to  make 
provision  for  special  courses  to  meet  the  extraordinary  demand  for 
social  workers.  This  would  be  especially  true  in  those  sections  of 
the  country  where  few  colleges  and  universities  give  adequate 
attention  to  the  social  sciences.  But  in  a  reasonably  brief  time  a 
sufficient  number  of  students  could  be  found  properly  prepared  for 
their  professional  studies.  The  number  that  would  be  lost  by  the 
setting  of  higher  standards  would  be  at  least  partially  offset  by  those 
who  would  not  have  been  attracted  to  the  professional  school  under 
its  present  system  of  instruction. 

This  emphasis  upon  academic  attainments  as  a  basis  of  educa- 
tion for  social  work  must  not  force  unduly  into  the  background  the 
personal  qualifications  that  should  be  possessed  by  those  seeldng 
training  in  this  particular  field.     While  in  all  the  professions  the 


EDUCATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK  509 

highest  success  cannot  be  won  unless  technical  equipment  is  sup- 
plemented by  a  high  grade  of  personal  qualities,  in  social  work 
this  is  pre-eminently  true.  The  social  worker's  stock  in  trade 
seems  much  less  tangible  than  that  of  the  engineer,  physician, 
lawyer,  or  teacher.  His  services  to  individuals  and  communities 
may  be  vital  and  based  on  expert  knowledge,  but  they  do  not 
always  stand  out  in  such  a  clear-cut  and  definite  manner  that  they 
are  easily  understood  and  readily  acceptable.  For  this  reason 
technical  knowledge  alone  is  not  sufi&cient.  The  social  worker  must 
be  a  salesman,  a  promoter,  an  organizer.  His  personaUty  should 
be  such  as  would  command  respect  and  win  confidence.  He  must 
be  a  community  leader  and  at  the  same  time  possess  those  qualities 
of  tact,  and  sympathy,  and  common  sense,  and  power  of  will  that 
give  him  personal  influence  over  those  whom  he  is  trying  to  help. 

Personal  qualifications,  therefore,  must  also  be  regarded  as 
necessary  prerequisites  for  technical  training  in  social  work.  Ac- 
curate means  of  measuring  these  quaHties  in  appHcants  for  admis- 
sion to  a  professional  school  do  not  exist.  A  careful  study  of  a 
candidate's  references  often  proves  insufiicient.  In  order  to  arrive 
at  a  correct  judgment,  this  should  be  supplemented  by  personal 
observation  of  the  student  during  his  period  of  training.  In  the 
undergraduate  school  of  social  work  a  decision  about  the  student's 
quaHfications  can  be  made  after  the  first  two  years'  work  before 
the  specialization  has  gone  far  enough  to  make  it  difl&cult  for  the 
student  to  change  his  line  of  study.  In  the  graduate  school,  an 
accurate  decision  ought  to  be  made  about  the  student's  personal 
qualifications  before  he  enters  upon  the  course.  Efforts  to  raise 
the  standards  of  education  for  social  work  must  include  due  atten- 
tion to  an  accurate  measurement  of  personal  qualities  as  well  as  of 
academic  attainments. 

IV.      TECHNICAL  COURSES  OF  INSTRUCTION 

In  the  discussion  of  the  historical  development  of  schools  of 
social  work  it  has  already  been  pointed  out  that  their  courses  of 
instruction  were  from  the  beginning  of  a  most  practical  nature. 
The  instructors  in  almost  all  instances  were  persons  engaged  in 
social  work  who  were  more  interested  in  imparting  to  their  students 


5IO  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

their  technique  than  in  following  the  usual  academic  type  of 
instruction.  Just  because  the  schools  of  social  work  were  organized 
in  this  way  they  escaped  some  of  the  shortcomings  that  have 
hampered  the  progress  of  other  fields  of  professional  education. 
The  first  engineering  schools  were  manned  by  university  instructors 
who  carried  their  university  teaching  methods  into  the  professional 
school  and  as  a  consequence  failed  for  a  long  time  to  adjust  them- 
selves to  the  real  needs  of  engineering  students.  Medical  educa- 
tion also  passed  through  its  didactic  method  of  instruction  and  only 
gradually  built  up  courses  growing  out  of  a  scientific  handhng  of 
experience. 

The  schools  of  social  work  on  the  other  hand  began  with  training 
classes  held  by  social  work  organizations  for  the  benefit  of  their 
own  employees.  They  were  interested  in  technique  rather  than  in 
research  and  sought  their  teaching  material  in  daily  experience 
instead  of  in  textbooks.  The  graduates  of  these  schools  there- 
fore were  usually  acceptable  to  the  social  agencies,  and  fitted  into 
available  positions  without  the  necessity  of  making  radical  adjust- 
ments. But  while  these  results  were  fortunate  it  must  not  be 
overlooked  that  schools  of  this  kind  have  a  tendency  to  place 
emphasis  upon  immediate  needs  rather  than  upon  the  thorough- 
going scientific  foundation  demanded  by  the  best  professional 
standards.  It  thus  happened  that  the  schools  of  social  work,  in 
avoiding  the  mistakes  of  academic  instruction,  went  to  the  opposite 
extreme  of  depreciating  the  value  of  the  scientific  studies  carried 
on  by  the  universities.  As  a  natural  result  the  professional  schools 
lost  in  academic  standing  and  were  generally  given  the  same  rating 
as  normal  schools  of  the  older  type.  The  universities  on  their  part 
failed  for  many  years  to  receive  the  impetus  to  the  development 
of  their  work  in  the  social  sciences  which  would  have  resulted  from 
a  frank  recognition  of  the  value  of  laboratory  and  clinical  work  in 
this  field. 

Within  the  past  few  years  this  traditional  gulf  between  the  social 
scientist  in  the  university  and  the  social  worker  seems  in  a  fair  way 
of  being  bridged.  Both  are  finding  that  they  have  much  to  learn 
from  each  other  and  that  through  a  union  of  effort  their  common 
goal  can  more  easily  be  attained.    The  social  worker  is  not  merely 


EDUCATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK  511 

a  practitioner  but  is  also  a  social  scientist.  He  must  therefore  be 
equipped  in  the  use  of  scientific  methods  as  well  as  in  the  practical 
technique  of  his  daily  work. 

This  new  attitude  cannot  fail  to  have  a  marked  effect  upon  the 
curriculum  of  the  schools  of  social  work.  It  at  once  makes  it 
evident  as  has  already  been  pointed  out  that  this  curriculum  must 
be  built  upon  the  foundation  of  scientific  studies  rather  than  upon 
the  foundation  of  general  education  and  practical  experience.  It 
is  difficult  to  see  how  instruction  in  schools  of  social  work  can  be  of 
graduate  quality  if  their  curriculum  is  adapted  equally  well  to  the 
needs  of  college  graduates  who  have  speciaHzed  in  the  social  sciences 
and  of  other  students  with  either  less  or  a  different  type  of  pre- 
hminary  education.  As  long  as  students  are  permitted  to  plunge 
into  technical  courses  of  social  work,  as  is  now  frequently  the  case, 
without  careful  study  of  those  sciences  that  deal  with  the  social 
order,  it  is  useless  to  attempt  to  standardize  these  courses  and 
maintain  them  at  the  high  level  required  in  other  professions.  But 
while  this  insistence  upon  a  proper  scientific  foundation  represents  a 
real  step  forward,  it  would  be  unfortunate  if  the  social  scientists  in 
the  universities  attempted  to  make  radical  changes  in  the  courses 
of  instruction  in  social  work  without  an  appreciation  of  the  value 
of  the  methods  that  have  been  followed. 

In  working  out  the  curricula  of  schools  of  social  work  the 
custom  has  generally  been  to  have  the  courses  follow  very  closely 
the  different  t}^es  of  work  carried  on  by  the  various  agencies.  For 
example  the  courses  given  by  the  New  York  School  of  Social  Work 
are  grouped  under  eight  departments:  case- work,  child  welfare, 
industry,  social  research,  community  work,  mental  hygiene,  crimi- 
nology, and  medical  social  service.  In  some  of  the  courses  certain 
processes  characteristic  of  the  different  kinds  of  social  work  are 
singled  out  and  the  technique  of  carrying  on  these  processes  is 
made  the  subject  of  instruction.  Examples  of  such  courses  are 
those  dealing  with  the  technique  of  case-work,  the  technique  of 
social  research,  the  technique  of  community  organization,  and  the 
technique  of  record  keeping.  Other  courses  deal  directly  with  types 
of  social  work  carried  on  by  the  more  important  social  agencies. 
In  this  group  we  find  such  courses  as  family  welfare,  child  welfare, 


512  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

recreation,  juvenile  delinquency,  housing  investigation,  psychiatric 
social  work,  and  medical  social  service. 

While  some  of  these  courses  are  similar  in  title  to  those  offered 
by  a  well-equipped  university  department  of  apphed  sociology, 
their  distinguishing  characteristic  is  their  emphasis  upon  technique. 
The  point  of  view  is  action,  not  contemplation  and  reflection.  The 
students  do  not  stand  off  and  study  the  problem  in  a  detached 
manner  but  are  made  to  feel  that  they  are  actively  participating  in 
all  the  processes  connected  with  its  solution.  They  find  them- 
selves surrounded  by  the  atmosphere  of  social  work  rather  than 
that  of  social  research.  As  a  result  they  do  not  learn  merely  about 
social  problems;  they  learn  how  to  deal  with  them.  A  typical 
university  course  in  the  administration  of  charities  may  make  quite 
clear  the  problems  in  this  field  A  student  in  such  a  course  may 
with  great  profit  to  himself  make  a  study  of  different  types  of 
administration  and  secure  results  of  value  as  social  research.  It  is 
an  entirely  different  matter  to  present  this  course  in  such  a  way 
that  the  student  assumes  the  attitude  of  the  participator  rather 
than  that  of  the  observer  and  thus  is  made  to  feel  as  living  reaHties 
the  different  methods  and  points  of  view  of  those  at  work  in  this 
field. 

This  type  of  technical  instruction  represents  one  of  the  great 
contributions  of  the  schools  of  social  work  to  the  field  of  applied 
sociology.  Without  courses  of  this  nature  a  high  type  of  profes- 
sional instruction  cannot  be  given.  A  great  mistake  will  be  made 
by  the  universities  that  have  recently  become  interested  in  edu- 
cation for  social  work  if  they  believe  that  the  addition  of  a  field- 
work  course  to  their  traditional  courses  in  social  science  will  equip 
them  for  professional  instruction.  Nothing  will  more  quickly 
discredit  the  recent  efforts  of  universities  to  enter  this  field.  It 
would  represent  a  backward  step  in  professional  education  in  which 
the  social  scientist  will  have  failed  to  take  advantage  of  the  painful 
experiences  through  which  the  technical  schools  of  other  profes- 
sions have  passed. 

If  the  universities  are  to  succeed  in  this  field  of  instruction  it  is 
essential  that  they  clearly  recognize  the  difference  between  the 
course  that  lays  emphasis  upon  knowledge  through  research  and  the 


EDUCATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK  513 

course  that  is  interested  in  technique.  At  present  the  tendency  in 
a  few  universities  is  to  combine  these  two  types  of  courses  under 
the  direction  of  an  instructor  who  may  know  something  about 
technique,  but  has  himself  never  mastered  it.  Such  a  situation 
would  not  be  tolerated  in  a  medical  school  for  there  it  is  taken  for 
granted  that  an  instructor  in  therapeutics  must  himself  at  some 
time  have  acquired  experience  in  that  field  through  successful 
practice.  Just  here  is  the  great  difficulty  the  universities  face  in 
developing  professional  instruction  in  social  work.  Men  of  aca- 
demic standing  with  experience  in  practical  work  are  not  easily 
available  for  teaching  purposes.  The  bearing  of  this  fact  upon  the 
problem  under  discussion  should  be  recognized.  Nothing  can  be 
more  fatal  to  the  influence  of  the  university  in  this  field  of  pro- 
fessional education  than  to  assume  that  courses  can  be  made  voca- 
tional by  a  change  in  name  and  a  slight  modification  of  content. 
Vocational  courses  worthy  of  consideration  in  professional  circles 
must  be  conducted  by  instructors  whose  minimum  participation 
in  practical  work  is  sufficient  to  enable  them  to  create  the  atmos- 
phere of  the  social  agency  under  discussion  and  to  impart  to  the 
students  its  point  of  view. 

The  influence  therefore  of  the  university  on  the  curriculum  of 
schools  of  social  work  may  not  necessarily  be  in  the  fine  of  progress. 
Their  methods  of  instruction  and  attitude  toward  practical  work 
will  in  many  instances  need  considerable  modification  before  they 
are  equipped  for  effective  leadership  in  this  field.  If,  however,  the 
necessary  adjustments  are  successfully  made,  there  is  reason  to 
believe  that  the  universities'  entrance  into  professional  education 
for  social  work  will  exert  an  influence  upon  its  standards  similar 
to  that  brought  about  by  their  participation  in  other  fields  of  pro- 
fessional education. 

Where  their  influence  is  particularly  needed  is  in  giving  greater 
emphasis  to  intellectual  standards.  The  curriculum  of  schools  of 
social  work  has  been  built  up  almost  entirely  by  practical  workers 
whose  emphasis  has  chiefly  been  laid  on  the  side  of  experience. 
The  courses  of  study  have  been  designed  to  teach  how  particular 
processes  should  be  carried  on  and  definite  situations  met.  Along 
with  this  emphasis  upon  the  value  of  training  by  doing  there  has 


514  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

grown  up,  if  not  a  distrust  of  intellectual  studies,  at  least  a  failure 
to  appreciate  their  proper  place  in  a  scheme  of  professional  educa- 
tion. This  tendency  is  by  no  means  new  for  it  has  characterized 
the  early  stages  of  legal,  engineering,  and  medical  education.  It  is 
an  inheritance  from  the  apprenticeship  system  of  training  and  must 
be  outgrown  as  standards  of  education  are  raised. 

It  would  be  imfair  to  leave  the  impression  that  present  courses 
of  instruction  in  schools  of  social  work  pay  no  attention  to  academic 
standards.  Much  progress  has  been  made  during  the  past  two 
decades  since  the  organization  of  the  first  training  classes.  Courses 
of  instruction  usually  incorporate  the  best  results  of  social  research 
and  carry  with  them  the  customary  quota  of  assigned  readings. 
The  chief  difficulty  is  that  the  requirements  in  practical  work  are 
placed  first  throughout  the  whole  course  and  are  in  some  cases  so 
heavy  that  time  for  study  is  reduced  to  a  minimum.  In  one  in- 
stance, the  students  in  a  school  of  social  work  spent  their  mornings 
in  practical  work  with  a  social  agency,  their  afternoons  in  classes 
at  the  school,  and  their  evenings  in  participating  in  the  varied 
activities  of  social  settlements.  The  usual  amount  of  readings 
supplementary  to  the  courses  were  assigned  to  the  students  but  it 
was  manifestly  impossible  to  insist  upon  the  outside  study  necessary 
to  make  these  courses  comparable  to  a  graduate  school.  While 
this  may  be  an  unusual  instance  it  is  fairly  typical  of  the  prevailing 
tendency.  What  is  needed  is  not  merely  a  recognition  of  the  value 
of  study  but  an  arrangement  of  the  curriculum  that  would  make  a 
proper  amount  of  study  possible.  It  is  to  be  expected  that  the 
influence  of  the  universities  will  be  in  the  direction  of  increased 
time  for  study.  Indeed,  unless  they  modify  to  a  certain  extent 
their  traditional  point  of  view,  they  may  go  too  far  in  their  intel- 
lectual requirements  and  fail  to  build  up  a  well-balanced  cur- 
riculum. 

Another  serious  problem  of  the  curriculum  has  to  do  with  the 
organization  of  the  courses  of  instruction.  What  principles  shall  de- 
termine the  arrangement  of  the  subject-matter?  Can  these  courses 
be  made  to  give  a  better  historical  perspective  and  a  wider  knowledge 
of  general  principles  without  detracting  from  the  interest  that  is 
always  aroused  by  the  immediately  practical?     Here  is  a  problem 


EDUCATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK  515 

that  is  vital  to  the  success  of  the  professional  school.  If  the  inde- 
pendent schools  of  social  work  have  erred  in  concentrating  too  great 
attention  upon  practical  problems  and  immediate  situations,  the 
university  courses  in  this  field  have  usually  gone  to  the  opposite 
extreme.  Will  it  be  possible  to  build  up  courses  that  will  avoid 
the  shortcomings  of  both? 

It  would  seem  that  the  solution  of  this  problem  does  not  demand 
a  radical  change  in  the  general  type  of  professional  course  that 
has  become  most  common.  In  so  far  as  these  courses  are  built 
up  around  a  study  of  the  problems  with  which  social  work  has  to 
deal  they  are  essentially  right  in  principle.  Courses  dealing  with 
problems  of  the  family,  the  community,  child  welfare,  juvenile 
delinquency,  immigration,  housing,  recreation,  and  similar  problems, 
not  only  cover  subjects  with  which  social  workers  must  be  familiar 
but  represent  the  best  pedagogical  method  of  approach. 

Where  they  frequently  need  strengthening  is  in  an  increased 
emphasis  upon  the  more  general  facts  and  principles  that  give  a 
comprehensive  understanding  of  the  whole  situation  rather  than  a 
definite  solution  of  the  immediate  problem.  The  problem  itself 
should  continue  to  be  the  point  of  departure  and  should  lead  in  a 
natural  way  to  a  study  of  the  historical  facts  bearing  upon  it.  By 
beginning  with  the  problem  instead  of  the  historical  introduction 
so  common  in  university  courses,  the  interest  necessary  for  con- 
centrated effort  is  aroused  and  the  interpretative  value  of  the  his- 
torical elements  stand  out  more  clearly.  But  the  point  where  the 
usual  professional  course  lays  itself  open  to  criticism  is  in  its 
tendency  to  lead  directly  toward  a  consideration  of  methods  and 
technique.  The  failure  to  give  sufficient  emphasis  to  the  complex 
factors  that  enter  into  the  problem  under  discussion  and  the  causes 
that  underhe  it  bring  about  a  concentration  upon  mechanical  pro- 
cesses and  an  overrefinement  of  technique,  that  may  be  useful  to 
speciahsts  who  are  to  deal  with  particular  situations  but  does  not 
make  them  professionally  educated  in  the  broadest  sense.  The 
ideal  in  technical  courses  of  instruction  is  to  make  everything  con- 
tribute to  a  thorough  knowledge  of  the  whole  problem  which  will 
as  a  matter  of  course  include  attention  to  the  most  approved 
technique. 


5i6  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

If  the  technical  courses  of  instruction  deal  in  this  way  with 
specific  problems  there  would  seem  to  be  less  necessity  for  courses 
in  which  the  entire  emphasis  is  upon  technique.  The  technique  of 
family  case-work  would  not  need  to  be  taught  as  a  distinct  process 
because  it  would  be  a  natural  part  of  the  courses  dealing  with  prob- 
lems of  the  family,  child  welfare,  juvenile  delinquency,  etc.  In  the 
same  way  the  technique  of  community  organization  would  be  taught 
in  connection  with  courses  in  community  problems.  Such  subjects, 
also,  as  methods  of  pubUcity,  financing  of  social  agencies,  office 
management  and  routine,  and  other  aspects  of  social-work  admin- 
istration, might  be  considered  more  effectively  in  their  immediate 
application  to  specific  problems  than  in  courses  dealing  exclusively 
with  the  technique  of  executive  management  and  administration. 

In  this  connection  it  ought  to  be  stated  that  methods  of  social- 
work  administration  have  never  been  given  adequate  attention  by 
the  professional  schools.  Courses  in  social  work  have  usually  been 
designed  to  prepare  technicians  rather  than  executives.  Since  the 
graduates  of  schools  of  social  work  have  found  their  most  available 
opportunities  of  employment  with  social  agencies  in  large  cities 
where  they  must  serve  for  a  considerable  time  in  a  subordinate 
capacity  before  being  given  executive  responsibihty,  there  has  not 
been  much  demand  for  instruction  in  administrative  methods.  But 
with  the  recent  development  of  social  work  in  small  towns  and 
communities  the  graduates  of  a  professional  school  will  frequently 
be  called  upon  to  take  a  position  where  both  executive  ability  and 
social-work  technique  are  needed.  Even  if  the  executive  positions 
in  social  agencies  in  the  large  cities  can  be  successfully  filled  by  per- 
sons who  have  come  up  through  the  ranks,  this  plan  will  not  always 
be  found  practicable  in  the  smaller  communities.  The  new  situa- 
tion can  only  be  met  by  an  adjustment  of  the  curriculum  of  the 
training  schools  which  will  provide  the  needed  instruction  along 
administrative  lines.  A  recent  effort  to  meet  this  need  was  the 
special  course  the  past  summer  at  Ohio  State  University  for  organi- 
zers and  executives  in  social  work.  This  course  which  was  given 
by  the  university  in  co-operation  with  the  Association  for  Com- 
munity Organization  and  the  American  Red  Cross  was  designed 
primarily  for  persons  of  social-work  experience  who  gave  promise  of 


EDUCATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK  517 

capacity  for  executive  leadership.  During  the  eight  weeks'  sum- 
mer session  the  attention  of  the  students  was  concentrated  upon 
the  principles  and  methods  of  community  organization  and  the 
problems  connected  with  the  administration  of  social  agencies. 
This  work  was  carried  on  through  classroom  lectures  and  discus- 
sions, assigned  readings,  and  a  limited  amount  of  observation  of 
the  methods  of  local  and  state  organizations.  The  remainder  of  the 
course,  which  covered  a  period  of  eight  months,  is  being  spent  by  the 
students  as  employees  of  organizations  doing  community  work 
where  under  the  supervision  of  skilled  workers  they  are  gaining 
experience  in  dealing  with  actual  administrative  problems.  A 
course  of  this  kind  has  real  value  for  a  picked  group  preparing  for 
executive  positions  of  considerable  responsibility.  Its  chief  present 
significance,  however,  is  in  calHng  attention  to  the  value  of  specific 
instruction  in  administrative  methods  and  in  demonstrating  one 
way  in  which  this  may  be  given  with  a  fair  degree  of  success.  The 
course  will  have  met  more  than  an  immediate  need  if  it  results  in  a 
greater  emphasis  by  the  professional  schools  upon  instruction  along 
administrative  hnes.  Such  a  strengthening  of  the  curricula  of 
schools  of  social  work  will  represent  an  important  step  forward  in 
building  up  a  well-balanced  professional  course  of  study. 

This  addition  to  the  courses  of  study,  together  with  the  in- 
creasing number  of  courses  that  must  be  added  to  the  curriculum 
to  keep  pace  with  the  rapid  development  of  the  many  different 
types  of  social  work,  has  brought  professional  schools  to  the  point 
where  they  must  group  their  courses  under  separate  departments 
and  direct  their  students  to  speciaKze  in  certain  lines  of  work.  The 
time  is  past  when  students  can  take  a  general  course  of  training  in 
social  work  and  then  be  equipped  for  a  position  with  any  agency 
they  may  select.  The  New  York  School  of  Social  Work  is  attempt- 
ing to  meet  the  situation  by  devoting  the  first  year  to  fundamental 
courses  that  may  be  regarded  as  common  to  all  forms  of  social  work, 
while  vocational  training  in  one  department  makes  up  the  work  of 
tljie  second  year.  This  selection  of  fundamental  courses  that  should 
serve  as  a  general  introduction  to  the  more  highly  specialized  voca- 
tional work  is  a  step  in  the  right  direction.  Too  early  specialization 
has  been  one  of  the  tendencies  of  the  schools  of  social  work  which 


5i8  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

has  had  the  unfortunate  result  of  turning  out  graduates  incapable 
of  seeing  beyond  their  own  particular  field. 

Just  what  should  constitute  the  fundamental  courses  that  should 
precede  the  highly  specialized  vocational  studies  is  doubtless  a  mat- 
ter about  which  general  agreement  cannot  now  be  reached.  It 
depends  to  a  certain  extent  upon  what  is  included  in  the  prepro- 
fessional  studies  that  have  been  completed  before  entering  the  pro- 
fessional school.  Among  the  first-year  courses  hsted  by  the  New 
York  School  of  Social  Work  are  courses  in  immigration,  labor  prob- 
lems, crime  and  punishment,  methods  of  social  research,  American 
government  and  administration — topics  which  are  ordinarily  cov- 
ered in  a  university  curriculum.  The  difficulty  is  that  with  the 
present  lack  of  uniform  standards  in  college  requirements  in  the 
social  sciences  it  is  practically  impossible  to  know  where  to  begin  in 
a  course  of  professional  education  for  social  work.  Certainly  no 
one  would  be  so  bold  as  to  claim  that  the  average  college  graduate 
has  made  such  a  study  of  the  social  sciences  as  would  definitely  pre- 
pare him  for  the  technical  studies  in  this  field.  The  fact  that  he  has 
taken  certain  courses  may  not  be  of  any  real  significance.  The 
content  of  the  courses  and  the  way  they  are  presented  must  de- 
termine whether  they  are  of  preprofessional  value. 

The  undergraduate  course  in  social  work  given  by  a  few  univer- 
sities would  seem  to  be  better  adapted  to  meet  this  situation.  In  a 
training  school  of  this  kind  it  is  not  only  possible  to  provide  the 
proper  number  of  preprofessional  courses  but  also  to  see  that  they 
are  properly  correlated  and  conducted  in  such  a  way  as  to  fit  into 
the  whole  scheme  of  social-work  education.  Under  this  plan  the 
preprofessional  courses  of  the  first  three  years  would  be  followed 
in  the  Senior  year  by  the  more  fundamental  technical  courses  that 
would  give  a  general  knowledge  of  the  field  of  social  work.  If  then 
this  is  followed  by  one  graduate  year  of  specialized  vocational 
training  a  standard  of  professional  education  would  have  been  at- 
tained which  under  present  conditions  cannot  generally  be  realized 
by  the  usual  two-year  graduate  course. 

[To  he  continued\ 


NEWS  AND  NOTES 


Notes  of  interest  to  the  readers  of  the  Journal  should  be  in  the  hands  of  the 
editor  of  "News  and  Notes"  not  later  than  the  tenth  of  the  month  preceding 
publication.  

The  American  Sociological  Society 

The  fifteenth  annual  meeting  of  the  American  Sociological  Society 
was  held  December  27-29  in  Washington,  D.C.,  at  the  Washington 
Hotel.  The  main  topic  for  discussion  was  "Some  Newer  Problems, 
National  and  Social."  At  the  first  meeting  on  Monday  night  Professor 
James  Q.  Dealey  gave  the  presidential  address  on  the  subject "  Eudemics, 
a  Science  of  National  Welfare."  Dean  Roscoe  Pound  of  the  Harvard 
Law  School  also  gave  an  address  entitled  "A  Theory  of  Social  Interests." 

President  Dealey  declined  re-election  for  a  second  term.  Profes- 
sor Scott  E.  W.  Bedford,  secretary-treasurer  since  191 2,  also  declined 
renomination.  Professor  Edward  C.  Hayes,  of  the  University  of  Illinois, 
was  elected  president.  The  other  officers  for  the  year  192 1  are:  first 
vice-president,  John  P.  Lichtenberger,  University  of  Pennsylvania; 
second  vice-president,  U.  G.  Weatherly,  Indiana  University;  secretary- 
treasurer,  Ernest  W.  Burgess,  University  of  Chicago;  members  of  the 
executive  committee,  E.  L.  Earp,  Grace  Abbott,  A.  B.  Wolfe,  Susan  M. 
Kingsbury,  Emory  S.  Bogardus,  and  John  O'Grady. 

The  report  of  the  Committee  on  Standardization  of  Research  was 
given  by  the  chairman,  Professor  J.  L.  Gillin.  Professor  F.  Stuart 
Chapin,  chairman,  presented  a  report  for  the  Committee  on  Social 
Abstracts.  These  reports  were  accepted  and  the  committees  continued. 
Professor  E.  C.  Hayes,  chairman  of  a  committee  to  consider  the  advisa- 
bility of  a  new  publication  for  the  Society  made  an  adverse  report, 
which  was  accepted  and  the  committee  was  discontinued. 

A  motion  by  the  Rev.  S.  Z.  Batten  for  the  dissemination  of  sociologi- 
cal knowledge  was  referred  to  the  executive  committee  for  action.  A 
motion  was  adopted  that  in  the  preparation  of  the  program  for  next 
year,  subjects  suggested  by  the  members  of  the  Society  should  receive 
consideration.  

Group  on  Social  Research 
Two  informal  meetings  on  social  research  were  held  in  connection 
with  the  meeting  of  the  American  Sociological  Society  in  Washington. 

519 


520  TEE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

Reports  of  research  in  progress  were  made  by  Shelby  Harrison,  Russell 
Sage  Foundation;  C.  J.  Galpin,  U.S.  Department  of  Agriculture; 
Robert  E,  Park,  University  of  Chicago;  Lucile  Eaves,  Women's  Educa- 
tional and  Industrial  Union  and  Simmons  College;  J.  J.  Gillin,  Univer- 
sity of  Wisconsin;  J.  E.  Cutler,  Western  Reserve  University;  J.  P. 
Lichtenberger,  University  of  Pennsylvania;  F.  Stuart  Chapin,  Smith 
College;  John  O'Grady,  Catholic  War  Council;  Franklin  Johnson, 
Grinnell  College;  U.  G.  Weatherly,  Indiana  University;  Agnes  M.  H. 
Byrnes,  Carnegie  Institute  of  Technology;  Bessie  B.  Wessel,  Connecticut 
College;  Harry  Viteles,  Kirkwood,  N.J.;  Milton  Fairchild,  National 
Institution  for  Moral  Instruction;  G.  S.  Dow,  Baylor  University;  and 
R.  H.  Leavell,  Washington.  Plans  are  being  made  to  have  meetings  in 
connection  with  the  National  Conference  of  Social  Work  in  Milwaukee 
in  June.  Communications  should  be  addressed  to  Professor  J.  J.  Gillin, 
University  of  Wisconsin. 


The  Sociological  Society  of  London 

The  formal  opening  of  Leplay  House  took  place  on  June  29,  when 
two  meetings  were  held.  Mr.  Branford  gave  an  address  on  "The  Main 
Traditions  of  Sociology."  A  symposium  on  "The  War-Mind"  was 
held  during  the  meeting  of  the  summer  term. 

Mr.  W.  Mann  was  Organizing  Secretary  of  the  Society  for  six 
months,  resigning  on  his  appointment  to  the  International  Reparations 
Commission  in  Berlin  as  assistant  to  Dr.  Marcel  Hardy,  who  was  selected 
to  organize  the  Agricultural  Section  of  the  Commission. 

The  Society  announces  that  although  only  two  numbers  of  the 
Review  could  be  published  during  1919  and  1920,  owing  to  the  high  cost 
of  production,  that  the  quarterly  issue  will  be  resumed  in  192 1,  a  sepa- 
rate fund  having  been  raised  for  this  purpose.  The  Society  secured  the 
services  of  Mr.  Lewis  Mumford,  formerly  associate  editor  of  the  Dial, 
New  York,  as  acting  editor  of  the  Review  during  the  summer  term. 


Bureau  of  Social  Hygiene 

The  Bureau  has  announced  the  pubUcation  of  American  Police 
Systems  by  Raymond  B.  Fosdick. 

The  book  is  based  upon  personal  study  of  the  police  in  practically 
every  city  in  the  United  States  with  a  population  exceeding  100,000, 
and  in  many  of  lesser  size.  In  all,  seventy-two  cities  were  visited,  and 
the  investigation  covered  a  period  of  more  than  three  years.    The  book 


NEWS  AND  NOTES  521 

will  appear  as  a  companion  study  to  Mr.  Fosdick's  previous  volume 
entitled  European  Police  Systems,  published  in  191 5. 

Mr.  Fosdick  was  once  Commissioner  of  Accounts  of  New  York 
City,  and  during  the  war  was  chairman  of  the  Commission  on  Training 
Camp  Activities.  Later  he  served  as  undersecretary-general  of  the 
League  of  Nations. 

"The  Indian  Journal  of  Sociology" 

The  first  two  numbers  of  the  Indian  Journal  of  Sociology  have  been 
received.  They  contain,  among  other  contributions,  an  article  by  the 
editor,  Alban  G.  Widgery,  on  "Sociology,  Its  Nature  and  Scope,  Aims 
and  Methods,"  and  two  papers  on  "Indian  Womanhood"  by  Maganlal 
A.  Buch.  The  Journal  announces  that  it  is  a  quarterly  for  the  scientific 
consideration  of  the  facts  and  ideals  of  social  life  and  organization, 
especially  Indian,  and  of  the  principles  and  methods  of  social  advance. 
The  Journal  is  published  with  the  sanction  and  support  of  the  govern- 
ment of  his  highness  the  Maharaja  Gaekwas  of  Baroda.  Communica- 
tions, contributions,  and  book  reviews  should  be  sent  to  the  Editor, 
The  Indian  Journal  of  Sociology,  Baroda,  India. 


The  University  of  Bombay  Department  of  Sociology  and  Civics 

The  University  of  Bombay  is  to  be  congratulated  on  obtaining 
Professor  Patrick  Geddes  as  its  first  professor  of  sociology.  Professor 
Geddes  is  a  scientist  of  considerable  reputation,  as  his  several  works 
with  Professor  J.  A.  Thomson  show.  For  many  years  he  has  been 
actively  engaged  in  the  planning  and  direction  of  city  and  other  improve- 
ments. We  trust  that  his  association  with  Bombay  will  not  only  lead, 
in  the  university  and  beyond,  to  a  spread  of  his  civic  conceptions,  but 
also  of  his  enthusiasm  and  to  practical  effects  on  the  civic  life  of  Bombay. 

Temporary  accommodation  for  the  new  department  has  been 
obtained  in  the  Royal  Institute  of  Science,  not  far  from  the  university 
and  the  beginnings  of  the  library,  and  facilities  for  students'  work  at 
all  times  of  the  day,  are  thus  arranged,  over  and  above  the  daily  lectures, 
which  largely  take  conversational  and  "  seminar  "  form.  A  public  course 
on  the  "Elements  of  Sociology"  is  also  given  three  afternoons  weekly, 
and  is  followed  by  discussion.  A  traveling  scholarship  to  Europe  will 
be  awarded. 

An  assistant  professor  of  sociology  has  also  been  appointed. 
Mr.  S.  N.  Pherwani,  B.A.,  late  university  librarian,  who  will  conduct 


522  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

the  course  during  Professor  Geddes'  absence  in  the  Summer  term. — 
The  Indian  Journal  of  Sociology. 


New  York  Committee  on  Atter-Care  of  Infantile 
Paralysis  Cases 

This  committee  has  published  a  report  of  "The  Survey  of  Cripples 
in  New  York  City."  The  committee  desires  to  send  the  report  to  those 
in  a  position  of  responsibility  in  agencies  for  cripples  and  to  all  those 
who  might  have  a  general  interest  in  cripples  and  in  plans  for  their  aid. 
Requests  for  copies  of  the  report  and  suggestions  for  further  possible 
distribution  of  the  report  should  be  sent  to  Robert  Stuart,  director  of 
the  New  York  Committee  on  After-Care  of  Infantile  Paralysis  Cases, 
69  Schermerhorn  Street,  Brooklyn,  N.Y. 


Bryn  Mawr  College 

Miss  Gladys  Boone  has  been  elected  instructor  on  the  Grace  H. 
Dodge  Foundation  in  the  Carola  Woerishoffer  Graduate  Department  of 
Social  Economy  and  Social  Research,  Bryn  Mawr  College.  Miss  Boone 
held  the  Rose  Sidgwick  Fellowship  at  Columbia  University  last  year, 
where  she  devoted  her  time  to  the  study  of  labor  movements  with  special 
attention  to  the  most  recent  American  methods  in  personnel  administra- 
tion throughout  the  country. 

Miss  Boone  received  the  degrees  of  Bachelor  of  Arts  and  Master  of 
Arts  from  Birmingham  University,  England,  and  was  for  some  time 
associated  with  the  Cadbury  Chocolate  Works  in  its  instruction  of 
employees.  She  has  also  been  associated  with  the  Birmingham  Labor 
Exchanges  and  investigation  work  under  the  trade  unions  in  England 
and  with  the  Workers  Educational  Association  movement. 

Last  spring  Mr.  John  D.  Rockefeller,  Jr.,  contributed  to  Bryn  Mawr 
College  the  sum  of  $100,000  toward  the  instruction  in  Industrial  Rela- 
tions under  the  Carola  Woerishoffer  Graduate  Department  of  Social 
Economy  and  Social  Research.  This  contribution,  together  with  an 
additional  endowment  which  is  being  raised,  will  establish  the  Grace  H. 
Dodge  Foundation,  affording  training  in  Industrial  Relations  and  offer- 
ing ten  scholarships  and  fellowships  of  the  value  of  $300  and  S500  each, 
and  will  also  maintain  the  expenses  of  field  work  and  supervision  for 
this  training.  In  this  way,  the  work  which  was  undertaken  by  the 
college  in  co-operation  with  the  War  Council  of  the  National  Board  of 
the  Young  Women's  Christian  Association,  has  been  made  permanent. 
Ab-eady  forty-two  women  have  been  given  training  for  positions  as 
employment  managers  and  work  with  personnel  in  industry  or  with 


NEWS  AND  NOTES  523 

industrial  groups,  and  are  holding  important  positions  in  industry  in 
various  sections  of  the  United  States  from  California  to  Massachusetts. 
Ten  students  are  now  registered  for  seminaries  and  courses  preparing 
directly  for  personnel  administration.  These  courses,  as  do  others  in 
the  Carola  Woerishoffer  department,  lead  to  the  degrees  of  A.M.  and  of 
Ph.D.  In  the  five  years  during  which  the  department  has  existed  at 
Bryn  Mawr  College,  two  women  have  received  the  degree  of  doctor  of 
philosophy,  four  have  completed  the  work  in  residence  for  the  degree, 
and  three  are  now  pursuing  courses  leading  to  the  degree. 


University  of  the  City  of  New  York 

A  course  of  twenty  lectures  on  sociology  and  modern  social  problems 
is  being  given  by  Professor  John  E.  Oster  at  the  Mount  Morris  Baptist 

Church.  

University  of  North  Carolina 

Dr.  Frances  Sage  Bradley  has  been  assigned  by  the  Children's 
Bureau  to  work  out  some  special  projects  and  plans  for  the  study  and 
care  of  children  in  rural  communities  in  connection  with  the  School  of 
Public  Welfare  of  the  University  of  North  Carolina.  She  will  begin 
these  plans  on  January  3,  and  will  work  in  conjunction  with  the  faculty 
of  the  university  and  with  the  students  who  are  doing  field  work. 

IMiss  Evelyn  Buchan  has  accepted  a  position  in  the  School  of  PubUc 
Welfare  of  the  University  of  North  Carolina  as  Supervisor  of  Field 
Work,  and  will  go  from  the  University  of  Chicago  after  January  i  to 
her  work  in  Carolina.  The  new  work  to  which  she  goes  will  offer 
unusual  opportunity  for  making  definite  contributions  to  practical 
laboratory  and  field  work  in  field  districts. 

The  University  of  North  Carohna,  through  its  School  of  PubUc 
Welfare,  has  been  holding  a  series  of  district  conferences  on  public 
welfare.  Each  conference  is  planned  to  include  approximately  ten 
counties.  The  state  commissioner,  Mr.  R.  F.  Beasley,  members  of  the 
American  Red  Cross,  and  other  volunteer  agencies  have  joined  in  these 
conferences,  the  purpose  of  which  is  to  co-ordinate  all  social  work  being 
done  in  the  counties.  Conferences  have  been  held  so  far  at  Salisbury, 
Fayetteville,  and  New  Bern. 

Smith  College 
The  Century  Company  announces  the  publication  of  a  book  Field 
Work  and  Social  Research  by  Dr.  F.  Stuart  Chapin.     With  the  increas- 
ing interest  in  social  research  among  sociologists  and  social  workers,  this 
volume  is  certain  to  secure  immediate  attention  and  use. 


REVIEWS 


Labor^s  Challenge  to  the  Social  Order.  By  John  Graham  Brooks. 
New  York:   The  Macmillan  Co.,  1920.     Pp.  441.    $2.75 

Once  more  we  are  indebted  to  this  pioneer  sociologist  for  a  sane  and 
wonderfully  clear-eyed  analysis  of  our  present  perplexing  industrial 
confusion.  It  is  a  rich  and  ripe  product,  somewhat  autobiographical, 
which  might  be  entitled  (to  borrow  from  the  great  dean  of  American 
sociologists),  "GHmpses  of  the  Industrial  Cosmos."  Its  chief  object  is 
"if  possible  to  throw  some  light  on  democracy  as  its  own  educator  with 
the  promise  this  holds  out  to  us."  The  author,  although  recognizing 
the  general  world-wide  drift  toward  some  form  of  socialism,  at  the  same 
time  preserves  a  balanced  attitude  of  justice  to  both  sides  and  both 
principles  involved.  "As  a  principle,  individualism  is  as  persisting  a 
reality  as  socialism.  As  the  former  tends  to  anarchy,  the  latter  tends 
to  communism,  and  we  shall  stand  out  against  the  excesses  of  both." 
A  further  hint  of  his  judicial-mindedness  is  his  frank  confession  of  facts 
that  he  does  not  like,  but  to  which  he  gives  proper  publicity  in  order,  as 
he  says,  "to  avoid  all  pleasant  lying."  For  example,  in  the  chapters 
on  "Government  Ownership,"  "the  Employer's  Case  Against  the 
Union,"  and  "Syndicahsm,"  both  sides  of  the  case  are  stated  with  ad- 
mirable fairness  and  real  critical  judgment.  He  recognizes  frankly  that 
both  employers  and  employees  have  used  tactics  of  violence,  that  both 
have  sometimes  played  crooked  games,  that  both  are  avid  of  power. 
However,  he  believes  that  labor  learned  tactics  of  violence  from  its 
masters  and  also  that  the  legislative  corruption  and  the  use  of  spies  by 
employers  are  grosser  evils  than  anything  labor  has  yet  perpetrated. 
He  is  strongly  against  the  use  of  force,  for  example  in  the  settlement 
of  strikes,  whether  by  government  or  by  private  employers;  and  he  is 
very  positive  on  the  analogy  between  international  war  and  the  civ'il 
war  of  industrial  armed  conflict.  On  the  other  hand,  he  recognizes  the 
dangers  of  weak  concessions  made  by  employers  out  of  ignorance  or 
sentimentality.  Incidentally  he  does  not  include  welfare-work  in  this 
category  but  pays  it  a  respectful  tribute  as  "capital  on  its  good  behavior." 

Out  of  all  the  turmoil  two  facts  emerge.  First,  the  union-smashing 
attitude  of  the  employers  as  a  class.  Second,  labor's  challenge  to  in- 
dustrial domination.     On  the  analogy  of  war  and  peace  between  nations 

524 


REVIEWS  525 

and  the  apparent  inevitability  of  some  form  of  international  organiza- 
tion for  peace,  the  author  argues  that  the  only  way  to  eliminate  mili- 
tancy in  the  industrial  situation  is  through  co-operation  and  education. 
We  have  recognized  in  him  an  able  student  of  the  co-operative  move- 
ment, but  never  before  has  he  come  out  so  strongly  on  this  point.  He 
now  looks  upon  industrial  co-operation  as  industrial  democracy  at  its 
best,  largely  because  it  tends  to  spread  "the  ache  of  responsibility," 
and  because  responsibility  always  tends  toward  stability  and  real 
conservatism.  On  the  other  hand,  he  recognizes  in  the  trades-union 
constitution-building  and  administration  a  much  misunderstood  but  very 
real  and  vital  education  in  industrial  citizenship.  While  the  employer's 
case  against  the  union  is  stated  with  the  utmost  frankness  and  without 
condonation,  and  while  it  is  admitted  that  labor  wears  no  saint's  halo 
and  needs  housecleaning  just  like  medicine,  law,  and  capitalism,  and 
while  the  attitude  of  employers  does  not  excuse  but  simply  explains 
labor's  sins,  yet  the  way  out  is  not  through  suppression,  deportation, 
or  bludgeoning,  but  through  encouragement  to  any  labor  organization 
willing  and  able  to  discipline  itself. 

While  the  author  holds  that  war  has  created  the  communistic  revo- 
lution and  while  he  appreciates  the  moral  ideahsm  of  the  communist 
movement,  yet  he  holds  that  "in  every  progressive  stage  man  has 
eventually  got  the  better  of  it  as  he  will  in  the  present  instance  if  labor 
be  given  a  fair  chance."  As  to  socialism  he  concludes,  "I  have  never 
seen  good  ground  to  doubt  that  though  the  socialistic  function  is  certain 
to  extend,  the  individualistic  and  voluntary  forms  will  also  extend." 
Of  government  ownership  he  is  frankly  critical  and  insists  that  both 
sides  present  their  proofs  and  cease  indulging  themselves  in  a  mere  battle 
of  feelings.  To  guild  socialism  he  directs  very  serious  attention,  not 
because  it  is  an  attractive  name,  but  because  the  rapid  growth  of  shop 
committees,  the  Plumb  Plan,  and  union  concern  over  scientific  produc- 
tion all  evidence  the  trend  toward  it.  As  a  remedy  to  all  the  welter  of 
feelings,  uninformed  idealism,  baseless  dreams,  self-seeking  violence, 
bad  faith,  and  ineptitudes  on  both  sides  of  industrial  conflict,  the  author 
demands  that  our  legal  house  shall  be  cleaned  of  its  present  discrimina- 
tions; that  the  safety  valve  of  free  speech  and  criticism  be  kept  open; 
that  we  get  away  from  the  witch-baiting  attitude  which  now  marks 
much  of  the  press  and  many  employers;  that  employers  particularly 
dare  to  stand  up  to  new  ideas,  to  face  them  squarely  like  one  of  the 
greatest  modern  English  employers,  Charles  Booth;  that  we  all  learn 
to  forsake  force  and  to  encourage  self-discipline  and  self-education; 


526  TEE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

that  we  encourage  experiment;    that  we  avoid  the  one-track  solution, 
and  that  we  approach  every  problem  in  a  large  and  liberal  spirit. 

In  a  brief  review,  it  is  impossible  to  hint  even  at  the  wealth  of  wide 
reading  and  rich  personal  experience  which  this  book  reveals.  At  the 
risk  of  appearing  captious  the  reviewer  offers  the  suggestion  that  in 
future  editions  some  mention  be  made  of  the  development  of  trade-union 
colleges  and  of  the  achievement  of  the  Workers'  Educational  Associa- 
tions as  factors  in  workingmen's  education. 

The  book  is  marked  by  humor  aplenty,  but  at  least  in  one  place  some 
unconscious  humor  has  crept  in,  as,  for  example,  page  388,  where  as  a 
reference  The  Survey,  "Act  4,"  is  cited. 

A  note  of  solemn  appeal  weighted  with  fact  closes  the  study.  "War 
has  left  the  dwelling  places  of  men  foul  with  vindictive  passions,  but  it 
has  also  left  there  such  hungers,  as  were  never  felt,  for  the  ways  of  peace, 
andgood  will  among  men."  The  best  augury  we  have  for  the  appeasing 
of  those  hungers  is  such  men  as  John  Graham  Brooks  and  his  writings. 

Arthur  J,  Todd 


Der  Nationalismus  Westeuropas.  By  Waldemar  Mitscherlich 
[Professor  in  the  University  of  Breslau].  Leipzig:  Hirsch- 
feld,  1920.     Pp.  373.     $8.50. 

This  book  commands  attention  in  a  double  way.  It  is  the  widest 
and  most  comprehensive  attempt  made  hitherto  at  investigating 
nationalism,  i.  e.,  a  phenomenon  which,  besides  socialism  and  capitalism, 
most  deeply  stimulates  and  most  enduringly  dominates  our  social  life. 
The  book  intends  to  trace  nationalism  back  to  its  remotest  connections 
and  is  based  on  a  synthetic  spirit.  And  the  author  has  not  only  first 
conceived  the  problem  but  also  the  method  of  his  research. 

In  his  opinion,  social  life  is  not  in  a  state  of  evolution:  the  present 
may  not  be  called  an  "organic"  development  from  the  past.  The 
author  abandons  the  theory  of  evolution  and  puts  in  its  place  that  of 
plurality.  His  theory  regards  every  social  phenomenon  as  something 
that  is  at  rest  and  secluded  in  itself,  something  peculiar,  living  a  life 
of  its  own  on  its  special  conditions.  This  theory  of  plurality  is,  perhaps, 
a  most  valuable  gift  to  the  whole  domain  of  science,  for  it  gives  a  chance 
to  regard  and  investigate  all  human  existence  from  an  altogether  new 
point  of  view,  and  it  will  thus  afford  quite  new  insights  and  prospects. 

The  book  shows  that  the  nationalistic  idea  had  no  chance  of  life 
in  the  Middle  Ages,  that  it  was  then  utterly  foreign  to  the  structure 


REVIEWS  527 

and  essence  of  society  and  state.  In  the  stage  of  early  nationalism 
the  structure  of  society  and  state  had  undergone  a  fundamental  change. 
The  modern  state,  based  on  unity  and  on  law,  lays  the  foundation  to 
nationalism;  besides  this,  several  causes  in  social  life  and  culture  help 
to  bring  it  forth;  a  great  influence  may  here  also  be  conceded  to  indi- 
vidualism. They  all  create  nationalism,  which,  however,  does  not 
gain  importance  as  a  creative  idea  until  toward  the  end  of  the  eighteenth 
century.  In  the  nationalistic  period  the  expansion,  the  essence,  and 
the  intensity  of  nationalism  become  visible,  with  their  relations  to 
state  and  economic  life. 

Of  especial  importance  at  the  present  hour  may  be  considered  the 
last  section  of  the  book,  which  deals  with  the  currents  of  thought  opposed 
to  nationalism.  Rival  ideas  are  rising  at  its  side,  ideas  which  strive 
to  go  beyond  its  aims  and  to  lay  stronger  claims  on  states  and  nations. 
Imperialism  and  state  unionism  may  be  mentioned  here — the  latter 
being  a  voluntary  coalescence  of  sovereign  states  into  one  political 
structure,  without,  however,  giving  up  their  individuaUty  and  full 
independence. 

These  few  words  do  not  suffice  to  give  an  idea  of  the  wealth  of 
Professor  Mitscherlich's  book.  Especially  his  theory  of  plurality  lifts 
it  above  the  level  of  a  scientific  publication  of  the  day  and  gives  it  a 
personal  note.  The  whole  work  abounds  with  valuable  sociological 
insights.  The  calm,  purely  scientific  tenor  of  it,  standing  above  all 
party  dispute,  will  be  enjoyed  by  all  those  who  desire  an  objective, 
clear  view  of  this  important  and  exciting  subject. 

E.  SCHWIEDLAND 

University  of  Vienna 


The  Casual  Laborer  and  Other  Essays.    By  Carleton  H.  Parker. 

With  Introduction  (26  pages)  by  Cornelia  Stratton  Parker. 

New  York:    Harcourt,  Brace,  and  Howe,   1920.     Pp.   199. 

(Published  posthumously.)  $1.75. 
Carleton  H.  Parker  plunged  into  first-hand  studies  of  laboring 
conditions,  especially  at  their  worst.  Unshackled  by  traditional  eco- 
nomic theories  and  fired  by  dynamic  humanitarian  purposes,  Parker 
in  his  relatively  few  years  penetrated  close  to  the  heart  of  the  conditions 
which  produce  the  casual  laborer,  the  I.W.W.,  the  economically  defeated. 
Parker's  approach  to  industrial  problems  was  through  the  avenues 
of  behavioristic  psychology  and  is  subject  to  the  criticisms  which  are 
befalHng  that  type  of  psychological  theory.     The  chief  criticism  of 


528  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

Parker's  point  of  view  is  that  individual  responsibility  and  individual 
selfishness  are  both  seriously  underrated.  Further,  Parker  professed 
a  so-called  scientific  unwillingness  to  give  full  recognition  to  the  intangible 
but  nevertheless  highly  influential  forces  of  moral  motivation. 

In  the  essay  on  "Understanding  Labor  Unrest,"  Parker  makes 
plain  how  unjust  laboring  conditions  supported  by  abstract  and  harsh 
economic  theories  have  suppressed  the  normal  and  healthy  instincts 
of  many  laborers  and  created  the  spirit  of  radicalism.  The  essay  on 
"The  I.W.W."  is  the  best  available  analysis  of  the  type  of  mental 
attitude  which  is  common  among  the  defeated  strata  of  American 
labor.  In  "Motives  in  Economic  Life,"  Parker  observes  that  "the 
domination  of  society  by  one  economic  class  has  for  its  chief  evil  the 
thwarting  of  the  instinct  life  of  the  subordinate  class  and  the  perversion 
of  the  upper  class."  While  this  conclusion  is  correct  as  far  as  it  goes, 
it  overrates  the  importance  of  the  instinct  life.  It  fails  to  provide  for 
the  defeat  of  that  virulent  selfishness  which  is  now  so  outspoken  in 
both  parties  of  the  class  struggle.  It  does  not  bespeak  a  socialization 
of  the  purposes  of  all  classes. 


E.  S.  BOGARDUS 


University  of  Southern  C.'Vlifornia 


Broken  Homes,  By  Joanna  C.  Colcord.  New  York:  The 
Russel  Sage  Foundation,  1919.  Pp.  208.  $1.00. 
Statistics  indicate  that  10  per  cent  of  the  demands  made  upon 
organized  charity  come  from  family  desertion.  The  proportion  of 
time  and  money  spent  in  dealing  with  such  cases  is  in  excess  of  that 
figure.  For  years  it  has  been  one  of  the  most  expensive  and  baffling 
of  the  problems  faced  by  relief  societies,  and  one  productive  of  extensive 
harmful  effects  upon  society  at  large.  To  professional  charity  workers, 
especially,  this  little  volume  of  Miss  Colcord's  should  prove  of  real 
value  and  serviceability,  for  it  contains  the  most  thoroughgoing  and 
practical  plan  of  dealing  with  desertion  which  has  yet  appeared.  The 
writer  is  herself  a  specialist  within  this  field,  and  she  is  able  to  supple- 
ment her  own  extensive  experience  and  observation  with  first-hand 
knowledge  of  the  methods  and  judgments  of  many  of  the  ablest  workers 
in  the  country.  The  book  must  be  regarded  as  the  authority  to  date 
on  the  important  question  of  how  to  deal  with  cases  of  this  type.  Details 
of  immediate  treatment  are  supplemented  by  practical  suggestions  as 
to  "  next  steps  in  corrective  treatment."    The  closing  chapter  is  devoted 


REVIEWS  529 

to  "next  steps  in  preventive  treatment,"  a  topic  of  still  greater  concern; 
but  with  the  exception  of  a  suggested  domestic  consultation  bureau 
to  be  established  in  connection  with  organized  family  agencies,  it  fails 
to  afford  as  much  practical  assistance  as  the  preceding  chapters.  Since 
the  volume  deals  entirely  with  desertion  and  non-support,  which  con- 
stitute only  one  type  of  broken  homes,  the  title  is  too  broad,  and  some- 
what misleading. 

Earle  E.  Eubank 
Y.M.C.A.  College,  Chicago 


The  Social  Interpretation  of  History.  A  Refutation  of  tJie  Marxian 
Economic  Interpretation  of  History.  By  Maurice  William. 
Brookl>Ti,  1920.     Pp.  222. 

Aroused  by  the  disorganization  and  disintegration  resultant  from 
the  Great  War,  Mr,  William,  a  disciple  of  Marxian  Socialism  for  more 
than  a  quarter  of  a  century,  investigated  for  himseK  and  came  to  the 
conclusion  that  Marx  was  mistaken  in  his  claim  to  have  discovered 
the  laws  of  social  evolution.  Mr.  William  repudiates  the  class  struggle 
as  anti-social  and  says  that  co-operation  and  harmonizing  the  interests 
of  mankind  is  the  true  method  of  progress,  hence  the  title  of  his  book. 

If  this  is  an  indication  of  what  is  going  on  in  the  minds  of  enough 
sociahsts  to  leaven  the  mass,  if  they  begin  to  doubt  the  absolute 
reUability  of  the  Marxian  formulations  and  are  willing  to  search  for 
fresh  guidance,  it  augurs  well  for  a  broadening  and  deepening  of  the 
socialist  movement.  Undoubtedly  the  greatest  obstacle  to  that  develop- 
ment has  been  and  is  the  absolutely  unquestioning  faith  in  Marxian 
principles  and  failure  to  accept  the  scientific  method  that  is  emerging 
in  the  social  sciences. 

Victor  E.  Helleberg 

University  of  Kansas        

The  Modern  Household.     By  Marion  Talbot  and   Sophonisba 

Preston  Breckinridge.    Boston:   Whitcomb  and  Barrows, 

1919.    Pp.  1-93.    $1.00. 

This  volume  is  a  revision  of  the  191 2  edition.     There  is  little  change 

in  the  text  except  the  inclusion  of  a  page  or  two  setting  forth  concisely 

the  effect  of  the  war  upon  fashions  in  dress.     The  suggestive  questions 

at  the  end  of  each  chapter  have  been  carefully  revised  and  the  bibUog- 

raphies  accompanying  the  several  chapters  have  been  enriched  by  the 

addition  of  new  titles,  especially  those  dealing  with  food,  clothing,  and 

household  management. 


S30  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

^More  revision  of  the  text  might  have  been  desirable.  The  effects 
of  the  very  general  instruction  of  housewives  during  the  war  in  dietetics 
and  in  modern  canning  methods  might  have  been  noted.  It  seems 
hardly  true  at  present  that  "only  here  and  there  traces  remain"  of 
household  processes  of  food  preservation.  Then,  too,  various  community 
and  co-operative  movements  affecting  the  household  would  seem  to 
be  of  suflScient  significance  to  deserve  notice  in  so  suggestive  a  volume. 

Mary  Louise  Mark 
Ohio  State  University 


Defective  Housing  and  the  Growth  of  Children.  By  J.  Lawsen 
Dick,  M.D.,  F.R.C.S.  London:  George  Allen  and  Unwin, 
Ltd.,  1919.    Pp.  94. 

This  is  a  most  disappointing  book.  It  is  neither  about  defective 
housing  nor  about  growth  of  children.  It  is  merely  a  study  of  the 
prevalence  and  the  effects  of  rickets  upon  child  health,  but  at  no  time 
does  the  author  indicate  the  actual  relation  between  the  physical  and 
mental  growth  of  the  child  and  specific  conditions  of  health,  stature, 
scholarship,  physical  strength,  or  any  other  condition  of  growth.  The 
only  instances  of  evidence  regarding  the  actual  housing  conditions  in 
their  relation  to  health  were  obtained  from  sources  other  than  Dr. 
Dick's  investigations. 

As  a  study  of  rickets  in  schools  the  work  is  no  doubt  valuable, 
but  it  lacks  adequate  consideration  of  those  factors  in  housing  upon 
which  a  classification  of  child  growth  could  be  based  without  danger  of 
attributing  to  housing  results  which  might  as  easily  be  attributed  to 
other  causes,  such  as  nutrition,  methods  of  living  rather  than  housing 
conditions,  and  such  habits  and  traditions  of  child  care  as  may  be  due 
to  racial  characters  or  the  industrial  life  of  the  mother. 

Carol  Aronovici 
S.\N  FRANasco,  Cal. 


RECENT  LITERATURE 


NOTES  AND   ABSTRACTS 

La  Raison  et  le  Progres  Moral. — The  fact  of  a  practical  judgment  seems  to  con- 
stitute the  initial  impulse  to  conduct;  we  acquire  the  sentiment  of  rationality  which 
reinforces  this  impulse;  the  principal  function  and  the  raison  d'etre  of  reason  is  to 
discover  occasions  of  action  for  the  other  tendencies  and  the  methods  of  assuring  their 
success.  Intelligence  can  be  the  instrument  of  the  satisfaction  of  any  desire,  good  or 
bad,  but  the  intellectual  desire  itself  is  clearly  on  the  side  of  virtue,  because  it  searches 
for  the  significance  of  our  acts  as  they  actually  are.  Though  individuals  may  blind 
themselves,  in  the  long  run  society  conspires  with  intelligence  and  will  not  let  us  escape 
the  facts.  The  mind  predicts  the  future  consequences  of  our  acts,  and  if  the  ordinary 
man  refuses  to  recognize  the  facts,  his  mind  cannot  always  be  debauched  to  the  point 
of  not  seeing  them,  because  they  will  be  pointed  out  to  him  by  others  who  share  neither 
his  prejudices  nor  his  particular  interests  which  warped  his  vision.  Pride  and  the 
social  motives  can  be  transported  to  the  side  of  virtue,  but  the  need  to  know  the  truth 
is  always  on  that  side.  Virtue  is  nothing  but  the  adaptation  of  life  to  the  facts  which 
intelligence  discovers.  Thus  reason,  which  alone  permits  social  control  to  define 
its  exigencies  and  to  elaborate  its  own  methods  for  satisfying  them,  in  a  way  that 
creates  a  situation  in  which  it  is  ordinarily  recognized  as  disadvantageous  if  not 
stubborn  to  do  wrong,  becomes  also  the  principal  factor  in  the  development  of  codes 
of  conscience  and  an  effective  stimulant  for  individual  virtue. — Edward  Gary  Hayes, 
Revue  de  L'Institute  de  Sociologie,  July,  1920.  V.  M.  A. 

Psycho-Pathologie  Individuelle  et  Sociale. — Not  only  has  a  comparison  between 
individual  morbid  states  and  collective  morbid  states  been  established,  but  as  far 
as  possible  it  has  been  attempted  to  give  positive  explanations,  that  is,  to  attach  the 
observed  facts  to  laws.  The  same  laws  have  been  invoked  for  collectivity  as  for  the 
individual,  after  being  assured  that  there  is  nothing  more  in  the  "collective  conscious- 
ness" than  the  psychic  states  modified  by  the  solidarity  of  beings,  by  intellectual 
interdependence,  affective  and  practical.  It  has  been  shown  that  the  reciprocal  actions 
between  the  indiv-idual  and  the  collective  consciousness,  bind  up  the  fate  of  each,  from 
the  psychical  point  of  view,  with  that  of  all,  and  that  of  all  with  the  influence  of  each. 
It  was  thus  legitimate  to  study  how  the  great  social  troubles  are  causes  of  individual 
psychic  pathology:  statistics  have  indicated  the  quantitative  relationships;  but  it  has 
taken  extended  development  to  establish  that  great  social  upheavals  have  an 
accelerative  influence  upon  the  psychoses,  which  demand  a  bio-psychic  predisposition, 
and  which  are  not  really  causes  but  less  serious  troubles,  more  or  less  lasting,  attaining 
above  all  fitness  for  personal  control,  for  the  domination  of  self,  for  deliberate  and 
voluntary  action,  for  strength  of  character,  for  regular  development  of  personality. 
It  was  not  less  legitimate  to  study  how  individual  psychopathies  are  causes  of  social 
troubles,  or  at  least  of  the  aggravation  of  many  of  the  pathological  processes.  Social 
psycho-pathology  thus  affirms  its  rights  to  take  its  place  among  the  studies  destined 
to  enable  us  to  more  fully  know  human  nature.  It  does  not  forget  that  man  lives 
necessarily  in  a  social  milieu  which  is  also  natural,  that  is  to  say  is  subject  to  laws 
as  the  physical  milieu;  the  social  conditions  of  health  and  of  psychic  malady  have 
their  importance  in  the  same  rank  as  biological  conditions;  the  concrete  being  is 
bio-psycho-sociological,  and  whoever  neglects  to  study  in  the  light  of  factor  and 
product,  cause  and  effect,  the  collective  psychical  life,  puts  himself  beyond  under- 
standing or  explaining  many  of  the  aspects  of  normal  or  morbid  life. — G.  L.  Duprat, 
Revue  Internationale  de  Sociologie,  July-August,  1920.  V.  M.  A. 

Mysticism  and  Art. — Western  civilization  is  many-sided  and  its  problems  are 
difficult  to  handle.  Each  aspect  of  life  makes  a  demand  often  compatible  only  with 
the  oblivion  of  all  the  rest.    Science  often  gives  the  sense  of  mastery  without 

531 


532  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

recognition  of  the  alienation  which  is  its  price.  One  of  the  most  interesting  modes 
of  the  reaction  of  the  mind  against  itself  is  that  from  thinking  to  the  enjoyment  of 
beauty  in  art.  It  is  perhaps  so  interesting  because  of  the  conviction  that  things  of 
beauty  differ  loto  coelo  from  the  process  and  results  of  thinking.  Thus  to  many 
severely  scientific  thinkers  music  seems  to  offer  refuge  from  the  dispeace  of  thought. 
Thought  is  forever  inadequate  to  achieve  the  perfect  comprehension  that  it  desires 
of  the  world  which  it  sets  out  to  know.  Yet  there  is  actually  an  experience  by  which 
in  some  sense  this  wish  is  achieved.  The  point  is  reached  when  thought  can  no 
longer  take  refuge  from  its  ov\ti  dissatisfaction  with  itself  by  passing  outside  of  itself, 
as,  for  example,  into  art.  It  is  now  compelled  to  transform  itself  while  yet  maintaining 
itself.  This  is  the  experience  of  mysticism.  As  opposed  to  the  movement  by  which 
thought  abandons  itself  and  seeks  refuge  in  the  emotional  and  sensuous,  mj'sticism 
is  the  demand  which  thought  makes  upon  itself  to  reconcile  its  aim  with  its  method. — 
M.  Thorbum,  The  Monist,  October,  1920.  O.  B.  Y. 

La  Guerre  et  la  Paix  d'apres  les  Previsions  des  Sociologues. — What  verifications 
or  what  challenges  has  the  European  catastrophe  brought  to  bear  upon  sociology 
as  regards  the  presumed  certitude  of  its  assumptions?  Sociology  has  for  its  object 
the  unraveling  of  the  immense  chaos  of  events,  of  discovering  the  necessary  laws 
of  the  constitution  of  human  societies,  in  order  to  deduce  therefrom  the  science  of 
government.  The  first  law  which  it  has  formulated  is  that  of  progress,  but  one 
sociological  school  sees  the  causes  of  progress  in  the  development  of  right,  founded 
upon  justice  and  reason,  and  considers  peace  to  be  the  principal  factor  of  social 
amelioration;  the  other  regards  war  as  the  most  precious  form  of  national  solidarity 
and  discipline,  recognizing  no  other  right  than  the  right  of  force.  The  essential 
traits  of  the  latter  school,  propagated  in  Germany  for  half  a  century,  have  been 
admirably  exposed  during  the  recent  hostilities,  while  the  pacifist  sociology,  widespread 
in  France,  England,  Italy  and  Russia,  has  not  been  studied,  either  in  its  detail  or 
entirety.  Saint-Simon  and  Comte  felt  that  war  no  longer  had  a  place  in  Europe, 
probably  reflecting  the  ambient  opinion  in  favor  of  disarmament  at  the  time.  The 
revolution  of  1848  exalted  to  a  paroxism  the  sentiments  of  international  fraternity, 
and  at  the  Congress  of  Paris  in  1849  Victor  Hugo  announced  the  creation  of  the 
United  States  of  Europe.  England,  in  insular  isolation,  provided  with  flourishing 
colonies,  and  enriched  by  her  commerce  and  industry,  offered  fertile  soil  for  pacifist 
ideas.  Spencer,  inspired  by  Darwin,  felt  that  the  industrial  t>'pe  tends  to  supplant 
the  miUtary  type  and  to  gradually  replace  the  forced  collaboration  of  earlier  ages 
by  voluntary  co-operation  in  the  exploitation  of  nature.  The  war  of  1870  awoke 
France  to  rude  reality,  but  thirty  years  later  a  new  generation  arose,  forgetful  of 
the  past,  and  the  proselytism  of  pacifism  in  France,  Italy,  England,  and  Russia 
became  more  intense  as  the  war  clouds  gathered.  Ferrero  believed  that  the  industrial 
civilization  had  created  new  conditions  of  peace,  that  the  predominance  of  nations 
loving  justice  and  right  was  assured,  and  was  struck  with  astonishment  by  the 
European  war.  The  science  of  economics  has  erred  in  thinking  that  sentiments  and 
ideas  follow  economic  facts  like  their  shadows.  The  national  sentiment,  overlooked 
by  pacifists  in  sociology  and  economics,  has  rebelled  against  foreign  domination  all 
over  the  world,  and  being  satisfied  seemingly  in  the  unification  of  Germany,  it  was 
changed  under  the  domination  of  Prussia  into  invading  militarism.  The  war  registered 
the  fallacy  of  pacifist  sociology  which  had  concluded  that  war  was  impossible  among 
the  great  European  states.  Such  a  profound  error  in  the  assumptions  of  sociologists 
puts  us  on  guard  against  those  that  we  may  make  in  the  future.  The  crowds  of 
laborers  striving  for  social  democracy  do  not  signal  the  triumph  of  reason  in  the 
conduct  of  society.  The  irrational  is  still  dominant  in  history.  Science  lays  aside 
the  search  for  final  causes  which  relate  to  metaphysics,  but  sociology,  whether  inclined 
toward  materialism  or  idealism,  has  always  been  fmalistic.  Its  assumptions  have 
been  dictated  by  feeling,  long  laefore  the  field  of  the  social  sciences  was  classified 
and  delimited.  To  pretend  to  the  character  of  science,  remarks  Durkheim,  sociology 
must  enter  the  era  of  specialism.  Even  then  prediction  far  into  the  future  will  be 
denied  it.  The  course  of  history  reveals  itself  to  us  as  an  evolution  at  once  destructive 
and  creative,  which  means  that  it  is  not  predictable.  We  must  limit  ourselves,  for 
the  present,  to  an  attempt  to  sense  tendencies. — Jean  Bourdeau,  Rcviic  Politique  el 
Parlcmcntaire,  July,  1920.  V^  M.  A. 


RECENT  LITERATURE 


533 


The  Motives  of  the  Soldier. — This  article  is  an  attempt  based  upon  the  author's 
experience  in  the  British  army  to  estimate  the  part  played  by  each  factor  in  the 
complex  of  motives  which  actuated  the  soldier.  Specifically,  the  questions  are:  What 
made  men  join  up?  What  sustained  them  during  the  long  war?  What  is  the  effect 
of  the  war  upon  the  soldier?  The  motives  for  enlisting  were  (i)  submoral  impulses 
— the  love  of  fighting,  the  element  of  romance,  the  hatred  of  the  enemy  and  mass 
excitement;  (2)  moral  motives,  the  cases  in  which  action  depended  upon  some  "ought" 
or  other.  This  class  includes  both  those  who  believed  in  the  Tightness  of  the  war 
and  many  who  did  not;  (3)  compulsion  by  some  external  agency.  Social  compulsion 
was  just  as  much  a  force  as  was  conscription  and  during  the  second  year  of  the  war 
reached  an  extraordinary  intensity.  At  close  quarters  war  imposes  such  a  strain 
upon  human  nature  that  the  motives  that  animate  the  recruit  are  not  always  sufficient 
to  sustain  him  throughout  the  course  of  the  war.  The  army  cares  very  little  for  the 
motives  which  make  men  join  up.  It  relies  upon  its  power  to  make  men  over  again 
by  its  own  process-discipline.  The  personality  of  the  army  soon  becomes  more  real 
to  the  soldier  than  his  own  soul.  The  whole  army  discipline  is  for  the  purpose  of 
merging  the  individual  into  the  mass.  Discipline  is  a  very  different  thing  from  leader- 
ship. Leadership  acknowledges  the  individual's  will  and  seeks  to  enlist  its  co-opera- 
tion. Discipline  makes  no  such  acknowledgment.  The  negative  side  of  discipline 
is  fear.  The  positive  element  is  esprit  de  corps.  In  a  long-drawn-out  war,  belief  in 
the  cause  will  sustain  a  soldier  when  other  motives  fail.  The  business  of  war  is  to 
kiU  and  for  this  reason  hatred  of  the  enemy  is  deliberately  inculcated.  Warfare  is 
brutalizing,  it  reduces  the  soldier  to  the  primitive.  The  benefits  of  army  life,  if  any, 
are  only  incidental. — J.  H.  Procter,  The  International  Journal  of  Ethics,  October,  1920. 

O.  B.  Y. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY 


BOOKS 


Adams,  Edwin  W.  A  Commvmity  Civics. 
A  textbook  in  loyal  citizenship.  New 
York:  Scribner.     Pp.  vi-|-385. 

Adler,  Betty.  Within  a  Year  After. 
Letters  from  Europe  regarding  the 
reconstruction  of  the  devastated  areas. 
Chicago:  M.  A.  Donobue.  Pp.  416. 
$2 .00. 

American  Red  Cross.  Annotated  Sub- 
ject, Index  and  Order  List  of  Books 
and  Pamphlets  on  Maternity  and 
Child  Welfare  in  England  and  Scot- 
land. W^ashington:  American  Red 
Cross.     Pp.  181. 

American  Social  Science  Association. 
Leadership  in  a  Democracy.  Jounial 
of  the  National  Institute  of  Social 
Sciences.  Boston:  F.  W.  Faxon  Co., 
83  Francis  St.    Pp.  192.    $2 .  25. 

Andrews,  J.  B.  Anthrax  as  an  Occupa- 
tional Disease.  Washington:  Govt. 
Ptg.  Office. 

Anthony,  Katharine  S.  Margaret  Fuller; 
a  psychological  biography .  New  York : 
Harcourt.     Pp.  223.    $2.25. 

Appelt,  Alfred.  The  Real  Cause  of 
Stammering  and  Its  Permanent  Cure. 
A  treatise  in  psycho-analytical  lines, 
ad.  ed.  Chicago:  Chicago  Medical 
Book  Co.    Pp.  234.    $2 .  50. 


Ayrinhac,  H.  A.  Penal  Legislation 
in  the  New  Code  of  Canon  Law. 
New  York:   Benziger  Bros.     Pp.  392. 

$3 • oo- 

Babson,  R.  W.  Fundamentals  of  Pros- 
perity: What  They  Are  and  Whence 
They  Come.  New  York:  Revell. 
Pp.  95.     $1.00. 

Baker,  Ernest.  The  Life  and  Explora- 
tions of  Frederick  Stanley  Amot.  The 
authorized  biography  of  a  missionary, 
and  explorer  amongst  the  natives  of 
Africa.  New  York:  Dutton.  Pp.330. 
$5.00. 

Bakewell,  Chas.  M.  The  Story  of 
the  American  Red  Cross  in  Italy, 
New  York:  Macmillan.  Pp.  viii-f- 
253.    $2.00. 

Barker,  J.  Ellis.  Modern  Germany. 
Its  Rise,  Growth,  Downfall,  and 
Future.  6th  ed.  entirely  re-written 
and  very  greatly  enlarged.  New 
York:  Dutton.     Pp.  ix-f-496.    $6.00. 

Bauer,  Otto.  Bolschewismus  oder 
Sozialdemokratie  ?  6-10.  Tausend. 
Wien,  '20,  Wiener  Volksbuchh. 

Beck,  J.  M.  Passing  of  the  New  Free- 
dom. New  York:  Doran.  Pp.  169. 
$2 .  00. 


534 


THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 


Behan,  Richard  J.  Pain,  Its  Origin,  Con- 
duction, Perception,  and  Diagnostic 
Significance.  With  191  illustrations 
in  the  text  and  many  diagnostic 
charts.  New  York:  Appleton. 
Pp.  xxviii+920.     $8.00. 

Belloc,  Hilaire.  Europe  and  the  Faith. 
New  York:  The  Paulist  Press. 
Pp.  261.    $2.25. 

Below,  Georg  v.  Probleme  der  Wirt- 
schaftsgeschichte.  Tubingen,  20, 
J.  C.  B.  Mohr. 

Benedict,  Elsie  L.  Practical  Psychology. 
Los  Angeles,  Cal. :  J.  F.  Rowny  Press. 
Pp.  xi+318.    $1.00. 

Bennett,  Arnold.  Our  Women,  chapters 
on  sex  discord.  New  York:  Doran. 
Pp.  264.    $2.50. 

Bernays,  Marie.  Die  deutsche  Frauen- 
bewegung.  Leipzig,  '20.  B.  G.  Teub- 
ner. 

Binder,  Rudolph  M.  Major  Social  Prob- 
lems. New  York:  Prentice-Hall  Inc. 
Pp.  324. 

Bishop,  Joseph  B.  Theodore  Roosevelt 
and  His  Time.  Shown  in  His  Own 
Letters.  2 v.  New  York:  Scribner. 
Pp.  xii-l-505.    $10.00. 

Blatch,  Mrs.  Harriot  S.  A  Woman's 
Point  of  View.  Some  Roads  to  Peace. 
New  York:  Woman's  Press.  Pp.  179. 
$1.25. 

Bohm,  Adolf.  Die  zionistische  Beweg- 
ung.  Die  Bewegung  bis  zum  Tode 
Th.  Herzl's.     Berlin:  Welt-  Verlag,  '20. 

Bok,  Edward.  The  Americanization 
of  Edward  Bok.  The  autobiography 
of  a  Dutch  boy  fifty  years  after. 
New  York:  Scribner.  Pp.  xx'iii-f-46i. 
$5.00. 

Briefs,  Gdtz,  D.  Untergang  des  Abend- 
landes.  Christentum  und  Sozialismus. 
Eine  Auseinandersetzung  ra.  Oswald 
Spengler.  Freiburg  i.  B.  '20.  Herder 
&Co. 

Brormer,  Gottfried,  Dr.  Die  Demokratie 
im  Staatsleben.  Berlin-Steglitz  o.  J., 
o,  Evang.  Preszverband  f.  Deutsch- 
land. 

Brown,  Edwin  A.  "Broke";  The  Man 
Without  the  Dime.  Boston:  The 
Four  Seas  Co.    Pp.  xviii+370.    $2.00. 

Biilow,  Friedrich.  Die  Entwicklung  der 
Hegelschen  Sozialphilosophic.  Leip- 
zig: Verlag  von  Felix  Meiner,  1920. 
Pp.  156. 

Burgess,  W.  R.  Trends  of  School  Costs. 
New  York:  Russell  Sage  Foundation. 
Pp.  142.     $1.00, 


Bushnell,  George  E.  A  Study  in  the 
Epidemiology  of  Tuberculosis.  With 
especial  reference  to  tuberculosis  of  the 
Tropics  and  of  the  Negro  race.  New 
York:  Wood.     Pp.  221.    S2.75. 

Buttree,  J.  Edmund.  The  Despoilers. 
Stories  of  the  North  Dakota  grain 
fields.  Boston:  Christopher  Publish- 
ing House.     Pp.314.    $2.00. 

Cause  (The)  of  the  World's  Unrest. 
With  an  introduction  by  the  editor  of 
the  Morning  Post,  of  London.  New 
York:  Putnam.     Pp.  \t-|-464.     $2.50. 

Charles  E.  Chapin's  Story.  Written 
in  Sing  Sing  Prison.  New  York: 
Knickerbocker  Press.  Pp.  xxiii-l-334. 
$2.50. 

Chellew,  Henry.  Human  and  Indus- 
trial EflBciency.  New  York:  Putnam. 
Pp.  xviii+149.    $2.00. 

Church  and  Social  Service,  the  report 
of  a  committee  appointed  by  the 
Archbishop  of  Canterbury.  London: 
Society  for  Promoting  Christian 
Knowledge.     Pp.  70.     15. 

Clark,  Francis  E.  Our  Italian  Fellow 
Citizens.  In  Their  Old  Homes  and 
Their  New.  Boston:  Small,  May- 
nard  &  Co.    Pp.  ix-f-217.     $1.50. 

Cole,  G.  D.  H.  Chaos  and  Order 
in  Industry.  New  York:  Stokes. 
Pp.  viii-t-292.    $2.75. 

Commission  on  the  Church  and  Social 
Service  of  Federal  Council  of  Churches, 
and  others.  What  is  the  Christian 
View  of  Work  and  Wealth?  New 
York:  Association  Press.  Pp.  v-f-94. 
Paper  $0.85. 

Committee  on  the  W^ar  and  the  Religious 
Outlook.  The  Church  and  Industrial 
Reconstruction.  New  York:  Asso- 
ciation Press.     Pp.308.     $2.00. 

Commons,  John  R.  and  Andrews,  John  B. 
Principles  of  Labor  Legislation.  Rev. 
ed.  New  York:  Harper.  Pp.  xi-|-ss9. 
$2.75. 

Conrad,  J.,  Dr.  Grundriss  z.  Studium 
d.  polit.  Oekonomie,  2.  H.  Jena:  G. 
Fischer. 

Cook  County  (111.)  Coroner.  Race  Riots. 
Chicago:  Coroner.     Pp.  135. 

Cope,  Henry  F.  The  School  in  the 
Modern  Church.  New  York:  Doran. 
Pp.  x-f290.     $1.50. 

Crozat,  Henry.  La  Cit6  id6ale.  Paris: 
Besson.     Pp.96.     Fr.  4.50. 

Dewey,  John.  Reconstruction  in  Phi- 
losophy. New  York:  Holt.  Pp.  vii-|- 
224.    $r.6o. 


RECENT  LITERATURE 


535 


Diehl,  Karl.  Die  Diktatur  d.  Prole- 
tariats u.  d.  Ratesystem.  Jena,  20, 
G.  Fischer. 

Dilze.  Stolypinsche  Agrar-Reform  und 
Feldgemeinschaft.  Leipzig,  20,  B.  G. 
Teubner. 

Donovan,  Frances.  The  Woman  Who 
Waits.  An  investigation  of  city  res- 
taurants and  of  the  waitresses  who  are 
employed  in  them.  Boston:  Gorham 
Press.     Pp.  228.     $2.50. 

Drummond,  Margaret.  Five  Years  Old 
or  Thereabouts.  Some  chapters  on 
the  psychology  and  training  of  little 
children.  New  York:  Longmans. 
Pp.   180.     $1.80. 

Duprat,  G.  L.  La  Psychologie  sociale: 
sa  nature  et  ses  principales  lois. 
Paris:   Doin.     Pp.  375;    8  fr.  50. 

Edman,  Ir^Nin.  Human  Traits  and  Their 
Social  Significance.  Boston:  Hough- 
ton.    Pp.  xi-l-467.    $3.00. 

Estoumelle  de  Constant  (d')  Que  devient 
la  Societe  des  nations?  Paris:  Gras- 
set.    Pp.  64.     Fr.  1 .  50. 

E.^ner,  Franz,  Dr.  tlber  Gerechtigkeit 
im  Strafmasz.  Wien,  20,  Manz'sche 
Verlagsb. 

FehMnger,  H.  Das  Geschlechtsleben  d. 
Naturvolker.    Leipzig:  C.  Kabitzsch. 

Fendrich,  Anton.  Der  Judenhasz  imd 
der  SoziaUsmus.  i.  -50.  Taus. 
Freiburg  i.  B.  '20.     E.  Guenther. 

FUng,  Fred  M.  The  Writing  of  History. 
An  introduction  to  historical  method. 
New  Haven:  Yale  University  Press. 
Pp.  195.    $2.00. 

Foster,  Wm.  Z.  The  Great  Steel 
Strike  and  Its  Lessons.  New  York: 
Huebsch.  Pp.  ix-f-265.  Paper  $1, 
Cloth  $1.75. 

Freytagh-Loringhoven,  A.xel,  Frhr.  v. 
Dr.  Die  Gesetzgebung  der  russ. 
Revolution.    Halle,  20,  M.  Niemeyer. 

Fuchs,  Wilh.,  Dr.  Logische  Studien  im 
Gebiete  d.  Jurisprudenz  Hanover, 
20,  Hehvingsche  Verlagsb. 

Gaultier,  Paul.  Notre  e.xamen  de  con- 
science. Paris:  Cres  et  Cie.  Pp.  208. 
Fr.  5. 

Glagau,  Hans.  Weltrevolution  und  na- 
tional Machtpolitik.  Greifswalder 
Universitatsreden,  in  Gruppe  i. 

Gobell,  Otto.  Die  Rechtsnatur  des 
Verlobnisses.  Gottingen,  A.  E.  Huth, 
'20. 

Great  Britain  Ministry  of  Health. 
Administration  of  the  Poor  Law,  the 
Unemployed  Workmen  Act,  and  the 


Old  Age  Pension  Acts.    London:  The 
Ministry.     Pp.  163.     is.  6d. 
Great  Britain  Ministry  of  Health  and 
Housing.    London:      The     Ministry. 

Pp.   127.    IS. 

Grothe,  Hugo.  Auswanderung  u. 
deutsche  Volkswohlfahrt.  In  Schrif- 
ten  d.  Instituts  flir  Auslandskunde 
in  Gruppe  i. 

Guenther,  Konrad,  Prof.  Dr.  Heimat- 
lehre  als  Grundlage  aller  Volksent- 
wicklung.  Freiburg  i.  B.,  20,  Th. 
Fisher. 

Guild,  Roy  B.  Ed.  Community  Pro- 
grams for  Co-operating  Churches.  A 
manual  of  principles  and  methods. 
New  York:  Association  Press. 
Pp.  xiii+253.    $1.90. 

Hackmack,  Hans.  Arbeiterjugend  u. 
sexuelle  Frage.  Berlin,  '20,  Ver- 
lagsgenossenschaft  "  Freiheit." 

Hapgood,  Norman.  The  Advancing 
Hour.  New  York:  Boni.  Pp.  262. 
$1.75- 

Ha>Ties,  E.  S.  P.  The  Case  for  Liberty. 
New  York :  Dutton.     Pp.128.     $2.50. 

Heifer,  Helmut.  Menschen  u.  Gesetz- 
verbesserung.  Leipzig:  W.  Hartel  & 
Co.  Nachf. 

Heyman,  Hans,  Dr.  Die  soziale  Sach- 
werterhaltung  auf  d.  Wege  d.  Ver- 
sicherung.    Berlin:  Julius  Springer,  20. 

Hofmann,  Friedrich.  Wohngenossen- 
schaften.  Berlin:  1920,  Carl  Hey- 
mann. 

Interchurch  World  Movement,  Com- 
mission of  Inquiry.  The  Report  on 
the  Steel  Strike  of  1919.  New  York: 
Harcourt.  Pp.  viii4-277.  $1.50, 
Paper.    S2 .  50. 

Jones,  Rufus  M.  A  Service  of  Love  in 
War  Time.  American  Friends  Relief 
Work  in  Europe,  1917-1919.  New 
York:  Macmillan.  Pp.  xv-i-284. 
$2.50. 

Judge  Baker  Foundation.  Harvey 
Humphrey  Baker:  Upbuilder  of  the 
Juvenile  Court.  Boston:  The  Foun- 
dation.   Pp.  133. 

Kaskel,  Walter,  Dr.  Das  neue  Arbeits- 
recht.  Systemat.  Einfiihrung.  Ber- 
lin, 20,  Julius  Springer. 

Kautsky,  Karl.  Die  Internationale. 
Wien  20,  Wiener  Volksbuchhdlg. 

Keynes,  John  Maynard.  Die  wirt- 
schaftlichen  Folgen  des  Friedensver- 
trages,  iibers.  aus  dem  EngUschen  v. 
M.  J.  Bonn  u.  C.  Brinkmann.  Mun- 
chen,  20,  Duncker  u.  Humblot. 


536 


THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 


Klores,  Hans.  Weltwahnsinn — Welt- 
wende.  Zuriick  z.  Vernunft!  Berlin, 
20,  Hans  Rob.  Engelmann. 

Knight,  M.  M.,  Peters,  I.  L.,  and 
Blanchard,  P.  Taboo  and  Genetics. 
A  study  of  biological,  sociological,  and 
psychological  foundation  of  the  family. 
New  York:  Moffat.  Pp.  xiv+soi. 
$3.00. 

Knowles,  Morris.  Industrial  Housing. 
With  discussion  of  accompanying 
activities,  such  as:  town  planning, 
street  systems,  development  of  utility 
services,  and  related  engineering  and 
construction  features.  New  York: 
McGraw.     Pp.  xxv+408. 

Kreibich,  Karl.  Tabor.  Eine  Halb- 
jahrtausand-Feier  d.  Kommimismus. 
Reichenberg  20,  Volksbuchhdlg.  Runge 
&Co. 

Laidler,  H.  W.  Socialism  in  Thought 
and  Action.  New  York:  Macmillan. 
Pp.  546. 

Laudynowa,  Stefanja.  A  World  Prob- 
lem. Jews — Poland — Humanity.  A 
Psychological  and  Historical  Study. 
Translated  from  the  Polish  by  A.  J. 
Zielienski,  C.  Sypniewski  and  others. 
Pittsburgh:  The  Author,  ii8  South 
i8th  St.     $2.25. 

Lay,  Wilfrid.  Man's  unconscious  pas- 
sions. New  York:  Dodd,  Mead. 
Pp.  vii  &  246. 

Leibrock,  Otto.  Arbeitsgemeinschaft 
(N.  F.  2.  Heft)  in  "  Grundbegriffe 
der  PoUtik."  Herausg.  v.  M.  H. 
Boehm.    Leipzig,  K.  F.  Kohler. 

Lenin,  N.  Die  grosse  Initiative.  Ber- 
lin: 20,  A.  Seehof  &  Co. 

Liebert,  Arthur,  Dr.  Vom  Geist  der 
Revolutionen  (1-3  Aufl.)  Berlin:  Ver- 
lagsanstalt  A.     Collignon,  '20. 

Liepman,  W.  Psychologic  d.  Frau. 
Berlin  &  Wien,  20,  Urban  und  Schwar- 
zenberg. 

Litman,  Simon.  Prices  and  Price  Con- 
trol in  Great  Britain  and  the  United 
States  During  the  World  War.  New 
York:  Oxford  University  Press. 
Pp.  ix-l-331. 

Little,  Esther  L.,  and  Cotton,  Wm.  J.  H. 
Budgets  of  Families  and  Individuals  of 
Kensington,  Philadelphia.  Lancaster, 
Pa.:  New  Era.    Pp.  vi+273. 

Loeb,  S.  I.  Everyman's  Child.  New 
York:  Century.    Pp.  286.    $2.00. 

Love,  A.  G.,  and  Davenport,  C.  B. 
Defects  Found  in  Drafted  Men. 
Washington:  Govt.  Ptg.  Office. 
Pp.  1663. 


McDougall,    Wm.    The    Group    Mind. 

New  York :  Knickerbocker.    Pp.  xxii-|- 

413.    $5.00. 
Marchant,  James,  Ed.    The  Control  of 

Parenthood.    New    York:      Putnam. 

Pp.  xi-|-222.       $2.50. 

Marett,    Robert    R.    Psychology    and 

Folk-lore.     New    York:     Macmillan. 

Pp.  ix -1-275.    $2.75. 
Meiklejohn,     Alexander.    The     Liberal 

College.     Boston:      Marshall     Jones, 

212    Summer    St.     Pp.    165.     $2.50. 
Mendelsohn,     S.    Labor's     Crisis.    An 

Emploj-^er's  View  of  Labor  Problems. 

New    York:     Macmillan.     Pp.    xii-f- 

171. 
Metzger,   Edmund.     Sein  u.   SoUen  im 

Recht.     Tubingen,  20,  J.  C.  B.  Mohr. 
Milner,  Duncan  C.     Lincoln  and  Liquor. 

New  York:  Neale  Pub.  Co.    Pp.  155. 

$1.00. 
Mink,     Frdr.     M.     Wirtschafts-Sozial- 

ismus.    Leipzig,  20,  F.  Volkmar. 
Miiller,    E.    R.     Der    junge    Arbeiter. 

Jungvolk  Biicherei  in  Gruppe  i. 
NiebergaU,  Frdr.     Evangelischer  Sozial- 

ismus.    Tubingen,  J.  C.  B.  Mohr. 
Nordau,   Max,   Dr.     Die  Tragodie  der 

Assimilation    in    "Die    Wiedergeburt 

an   der   Schwelle,"  hrsg.   von   David 

Erdtracht,  Wien,  20,  A.  Schonfeld  in 

Komm.     auck  Palestina,    d.  Land  d. 

jiid.  Gegenwart  und  Zukunft. 
Notzel,    Karl.    Der   russische   mid   der 

deutsche  Geist.    Berlin,   20,   Furche- 

Verlag. 
Nussbaum,  Arthur.    Das  neue  deutsche 

Wirtschaftsrecht.    Berlin,    20,    Julius 

Springer. 
Odencrantz,  Louise  C.    Italian  Women 

in  Industry.     A  study  of  conditions  in 

New  York  City.     New  York:  Russell 

Sage  Foundation  1919.    Pp.  v-f-345- 

$1.50. 
Oldenberg,  Herm.    Buddha.    SeinLeben, 

seine     Lehre,      seine     Gemeinde.     7. 

Aufl.,     Stuttgart,    J.    G.    Cottasche 

Buchl.  Nachf.  '20. 
Oppeln-Bronikowski,     Frdr.     v.      Anti- 

semitismus?    Eine  unparteische  Priif- 

ung    des    Problems.     Charlottenburg, 

20,  Deutsche  Verlagsges.  f iir  Politik  u. 

Geschichte. 
Patrick,  G.  T.  W.     Psychology  of  Social 

Reconstruction.     New  York:    Hough- 
ton.    Pp.  273.    $2.00. 
Phillipovich,  Eugen  V.,  Dr.     Grundriss 

d.    polit.  Oekonomie.     Tubingen,  '20, 

J.  C.  B.  Mohr. 


RECENT  LITERATURE 


537 


Placzek.    Das  Geschlechtsleben  der  Hy- 

sterischen.    Eine  medizinische,  soziolo- 

gische  und  forensische  Studie.     Bonn: 

A.  Marcus  &  E.  Weber's  Verlag.     Pp. 

264.     M.  15. 
Postgate,  R.  W.    The  Bolshevik  Theory. 

New  York:    Dodd,  Mead.     Pp.  240. 

$2.00. 
Radek,  Karl.     Anarchismus  und  Sowiet- 

regierung.    Wien,     20     (Wien     VIII, 

Alserstr  69.     Arbeiter-Buchh.). 
.     Programm    d.     Sozialist.     Wirt- 

schaftsbaues.    Wien     (VII,     Alserstr 

69),  '20,  Arbeiterbuchhdlg. 
Rathenau,  Walter.     Demokratische  Ent- 

wicklung.     Berlin,    S.    Fischer    Verl. 

('20?) 
.     Was  wird  werden?    Berlin,   20, 

S.  Fischer,  Verl. 
Repplier,    Agnes.     Points    of    Friction. 

Boston:  Houghton,  Mifflin.    Pp.  275. 

Si-75- 

Roscher,  Wilhelm.  Economie  Indus- 
trielle.  Paris:  M.  Girard  et  E.  Briere. 
1920.     Pp.  xx+472.     Fr.  18. 

Routzahn,  Mary  S.  Traveling  Publicity 
Campaigns.  Educational  tours  of  rail- 
road trains  and  motor  vehicles.  New 
York:  Russell  Sage  Foundation.  Pp. 
xi+151.     $1.50. 

Ruckhaber,  Erich.  Die  richtige  Bewer- 
tung  d.  Korper-u.  Geistes-Arbeit.  3. 
Aufl.  '20,  Verlag  d.  "Neuen  Weltan- 
schauung." 

Schmitt,  Ernst.  Die  Wiederaufrichtung 
Europas.      Jena,    20,    E.    Diederichs. 

Scott,  Emmett  J.  Negro  Migration 
during  the  War.  New  York:  O.xford 
University  Press.     Pp.  v+189. 

Sheffield,  Ada  E.  The  Social  Case  His- 
tor>'.  Its  Construction  and  Content. 
New  York:  Russell  Sage  Foundation. 
Pp.  227.    $1 .00. 

Sims,  Newell  S.  The  Rural  Community, 
Ancient  and  Modem.  New  York: 
Scribner.     Pp.  xxiii-j-916.    S4.50. 

Spargo,  Jolin.  The  Greatest  Failure  in 
all  Histor)'.  A  critical  examination 
of  the  actual  workings  of  Bolshevism 
in  Russia.  New  York:  Harper.  Pp. 
xvii+486.    $2.50. 

Stern,  William,  Dr.  Die  Intelligenz 
d.  Kinder  und  Jugendlichen  u.  d. 
Methoden  ihrer  Untersuchung.  Leip- 
zig, 20,  J.  H.  Barth. 

.     Die   Psychologic  u.   d.   Schiiler- 

auflese.    Leipzig,  '20,  J.  H.  Barth. 

Sternberg,  Kurt,  Dr.  Moderne  Gedan- 
ken  iiber  Staat  und  Erziehung  bei 
Plato.    Berlin,  A.  CoUignan,  '20. 


Stevens,    Doris.    Jailed    for    Freedom. 

New     York:      Boni.    Pp.     xii+388. 

$3.00. 
Stieve,  Frdr.     Gedanken  iiber  Deutsch- 

land.    Jena,  20,  E.  Diederichs. 
Stone,     Lee     Alexander,     M.D.      The 

W'oman  of  the  Streets.     Kansas  City: 

Burton.     Pp.112.     $1.50. 
Storey,  Moorfield.     Problems  of  Today. 

Boston:    Houghton  Mifflin  Co.    Pp. 

258.     $1.50. 
Sweetser,  A.    The  League  of  Nations  at 

Work.     New  York:    Macmillan.     Pp. 

215.     $1.75- 
Tansley,    A.    G.     New  Psychology  and 

Its    Relation    to    Life.     New    York: 

Dodd,  Mead.     Pp.  283. 
Taut,  Bruno.     Die  Auflosung  d.  Stadte. 

Hagen,  20,  Folkwang-  Verlag. 
Thalbitzer,    S.,   Dr.     Stimmvmgen,  Ge- 

fuhle    und    Gemiitsbewegungen.      Ins 

Deutsche  iibersetzt  von    E.  Magnus, 

Kopenhagen,  20,  Neuer  Nord.  Verlag. 
Thompson,     Frank    V.      Schooling     of 

the        Immigrant      (Americanization 

studies).     New    York:     Harper.    Pp. 

403- 
.    Schooling     of     the     Immigrant. 

New   York:    Harper.    Pp.   xxi+408. 

$2.00. 
Thorsch,  Berth.     Sozialisierung  u.  Gesell- 

schaftsverfassung.    Wien,  20,  Manz'- 

sche  Verlh. 
Tridon,     Andr€.     Psychoanalysis.     Its 

Histor)%  Theory,  and  Practice.     New 

York:  Huebsch.    Pp.  vii+252.    $2.00. 
Turner,  Frederick  J.    The  Frontier  in 

American  History.    New  York:  Holt. 

Pp- 375-    $2.50. 
United    States    Department    of    Labor. 

Proceedings    of    the    First    Industrial 

Conference  (called  by  the  President). 

U.S.  Dept.  of  Labor.     Pp.  285. 
United  States  House  Committee  on  Rules. 

Investigation    of    Administration    of 

Louis  F.  Post,  Assistant  Secretary  of 

Labor,  in  the  Matter  of  Deportation 

of    Aliens.     Apply   to    Congressman. 

Pp.  269. 
Van    Wesep,    H.    B.    The    Control    of 

Ideals.    A  contribution  to  the  study 

of  ethics.     New  York:    Knopf.    Pp. 

154.    $2. 00. 
Vrba,  Rud.     Der  Kapitalismus  im  Welt- 

krieg.     Prag,  20,  F.  Riondc  in  Komm. 
Waldo,  FuUerton  L.    With  Grenfell  on 

the    Labrador.     New    York:     Revell. 

Pp.189.    $i-7S- 


538 


THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 


Webb,  Sidney,  and  Webb,  Beatrice  P. 
A  Constitution  for  the  Socialist  Com- 
monwealth of  Great  Britain.  New 
York:  Longmans.  Pp.  x\iii-f364. 
$4-25- 

Weltsch,  Felix.  Nationalismus  und 
Judentum.    Berlin,  1920,  Welt  Verlag. 

Williams,  James  M.  The  Foundations  of 
Social  Science.  New  York:  Knopf. 
Pp.  x\'i-|-494.     $6.00. 

Williams,  Mary  W.  Social  Scandinavia 
in  the  Viking  Age.  New  York:  Mac- 
millan.    Pp.  x-}-45i.    $6.00. 

Williams,  Whiting.  What's  on  the 
Worker's  Mind.  By  one  who  put  on 
overalls  to  find  out.  New  York: 
Scribner.    Pp.329.    $2.50. 


Wilutzky,  Konrad.  Die  Liebe.  Wissen- 
schaftliche  Gnmdlegung  der  Ethik. 
Jena,  20,  E.  Diederichs. 

Wissler,  Clark.  The  American  Indian: 
An  Introduction  to  the  Anthropology 
of  the  New  World.  New  York: 
McMurtrie.     Pp.435.    S3. 00. 

Women  Physicians,  Proceedings  of  Inter- 
national Conference  of.  6  vols.  New 
York:  The  Woman's  Press,  600  Lex- 
ington Ave.     Pp.  1 150.     $3.50. 

Yealland,  Lewis  R.  Hysterical  Dis- 
orders of  Warfare.  New  York:  Mac- 
millan.     Pp.  viii+252. 

Yerkes,  Robert  M.  (Ed.)  The  New 
World  of  Science.  Its  Development 
during  the  War.  New  York:  Cen- 
tury Co.    Pp.  xix+443.    $3  00. 


PAMPHLETS 


American  School  Hygiene  Association. 
School  Children's  Health:  What 
Mothers  Should  and  Can  Do  about 
It.  Pittsburgh:  The  Association,  no i 
Fulton  Bldg.     Pp.  47. 

Anthony,  Katharine  (Ed.).  The  Endow- 
ment of  Motherhood.  New  York: 
Huebsch.     Pp.  xii+76.     Price  $0.50. 

Associated  Industries  of  Seattle.  Indus- 
trial Court  of  Kansas.  Seattle:  Public 
Library.     Pp.  38. 

Australia.  Population  and  Vital  Statis- 
tics. Bulletin  No.  36  Common- 
wealth Demography,  1918  and 
previous  years.  G.  H.  Knibbs,  Com- 
monwealth Statistician.  Melbourne: 
Albert  J.  MuUett,  Govt.  Printer. 
Pp.  253.     65.  id. 

Bernard,  L.  L.  The  Function  of  Generali- 
zation. Chicago:  Open  Court  Pub. 
Co.    Pp.  7. 

Bernstein,  Charles.  Colony  and  Extra- 
Institutional  Care  for  the  Feeble- 
Minded.  50  Union  Sq.,  New  York: 
National  Committee  for  Mental  Hy- 
giene.    Pp.  28. 

Bowley,  A.  L.  The  Division  of  the 
Product  of  Industry.  An  analysis  of 
national  income  before  the  War. 
New  York:  Oxford  University  Press. 
PP-  SS- 

.    The  Change  in  the  Distribution 

of  the  National  Income,  1 880-1913. 
New  York:  Oxford  University  Press. 
Pp.  27. 

Breckinridge,  S.  P.,  and  Jeter,  H.  R. 
Summary  of  Juvenile  Court  Legisla- 
tion in  the  U.S.  Washington:  U.S. 
Children's  Bureau.    Pp.  no. 


Bureau  of  Applied  Economics,  Inc., 
Washington.  Wages  in  Various  In- 
dustries and  Occupations.  A  sum- 
mary of  wage  movements  1914-1920. 
Washington:  The  Bureau.     Pp.  60. 

Bumight,  Ralph  F.  The  Japanese  in 
Rural  Los  Angeles  County.  Los 
Angeles:  University  of  Southern  Cali- 
fornia.    Pp.  16. 

Canada  Department  of  Labor.  Informa- 
tion Respecting  the  Russian  Soviet 
System  and  Its  Propaganda  in  North 
America.  Ottawa:  The  Department. 
Pp.  18. 

Children's  Aid  Society.  Bovs'  Work. 
105  E.  22d  St.,  New  York:  The 
Society.     Pp.  16. 

Chinese  National  W^elfare  Society  in 
America.  Shantung  Question  and 
Other  Claims  as  OflQcially  Presented 
to  the  Peace  Conference  in  Paris. 
San  Francisco:  The  Societ}',  519  Cali- 
fornia St.     Pp.  95. 

Committee  of  Fifteen,  Chicago.  Annual 
Report  for  the  Year  Ended  April  30, 
1920.  Chicago:  The  Committee.  Pp. 
19. 

Committee  of  Fire  Prevention  and  Engi- 
neering Standards.  Report  on  the 
City  of  Columbus,  Ohio.  New  York: 
National  Board  of  Fire  Underwriters. 
Pp-  33- 

Cooley,  E.  J.  Progress  of  Probation. 
New  York:  300  Mulberry  St.,  Board 
of  City  Magistrates.     Pp.  36. 

Davison,  Henry  P.  A  Plan  to  Meet 
Europe's  Need.  New  York:  The 
Author,  690  Park  Ave.     Pp.  5. 


RECENT  LITERATURE 


539 


Davison,  Henry  P.  Europe's  Need,  A 
Report.  New  York:  The  Author,  690 
Park  Ave.     Pp.  40. 

Demartial,  Georges.  Patriotism  and 
Responsibility  for  the  War.  New  York : 
Huebsch.     Pp.57.    $0.50. 

Freund,  Ernst.  Illegitimacy  Laws  of  the 
United  States  and  Certain  Foreign 
Countries.  Washington:  Govt.  Ptg. 
Office.     Pp.  260. 

GilFillan,  S.  C.  The  Coldward  Course 
of  Progress.  New  York:  Academy  of 
Political  Science,  Columbia  Univer- 
sity.    Pp.  17. 

Gilkey,  C.  W.  The  Local  Church  after 
the  War.  New  York:  Committee  on 
the  War  and  the  Religious  Outlook, 
Association  Press.     Pp.  22. 

Great  Britain  Departmental  Committee 
on  Workmen's  Compensation.  Report 
of  the  Committee  to  Inquire  into  the 
System  of  Compensation  for  Injuries 
to  Workmen.  London:  The  Depart- 
ment.   Pp.  86.     TS. 

Great  Britain  Ministry  of  Health. 
Housing  and  Town  Planning.  Lon- 
don:  The  Ministry.    Pp.  56.    <)d. 

Griinberg,  Carl.  Archiv  fiir  die  Ge- 
schichte  des  Sozialismus  imd  der 
Arbeiterbewegung.  Leipzig:  C.  L. 
Hirschfeld,  TSubchenweg  21.    Pp.  167. 

Haberman,  J.  Victor.  The  Measures 
of  Intelligence  Diagnostically  Remeas- 
ured.     New  York:   Wood.     Pp.  60. 

Haines,  George  G.  The  Movement  for 
the  Reorganization  of  State  Adminis- 
tration. Austin,  Tex.:  University  of 
Texas.     Pp.  80. 

Hardy,  C.  O.  The  Negro  Question  in 
the  French  Revolution.  Menasha, 
Wis.:  Banta.     Pp.  91. 

Harper,  Roland  M.  Some  Relations 
between  Soil,  Climate  and  Civiliza- 
tion in  the  Southern  Red  Hills  of 
Alabama.  Durham,  N.C.:  South  At- 
lantic Quarterly.     Pp.  14. 

Hay,  J.  H.  Investigation  of  the  Produc- 
tion, Distribution  and  Prices  of  Milk. 
St.  Paul:  Minnesota  Department  of 
Agriculture.     Pp.  14. 

Hillquit,  Morris.  Present-day  Social- 
ism. New  York :  The  Rand  School  of 
Social  Science.     Pp.  84.    $0.50. 

Hoffman,  F.  L.  Is  Leprosy  Increasing  ? 
Newark:     Prudential    Insurance    Co, 

Pp-  53- 
.     Malaria    Eradication    and    Mos- 
quito  Control.    Newark:    Prudential 
Insurance  Co.     Pp.  8. 


.  Mortality  from  Respiratory  Dis- 
eases in  the  Glass  Industry.  Newark: 
Prudential  Insurance  Co.     Pp.  5. 

.    Occupational  Diseases  and  Their 

Compensation.  With  Special  Refer- 
ence to  Anthrax  and  Miner's  Lung 
Diseases.  Newark:  Prudential  Insur- 
ance Co.    Pp.  42. 

.  Progress  of  the  Safety  Move- 
ment in  Great  Britain.  Newark: 
Prudential  Insurance  Co.     Pp.  9. 

Holmes,  J.  H.  Collapse  of  Civilization: 
Can  Humanity  be  Saved  ?  New  York: 
Commimity  Church,  Park  Ave.  and 
34th  St.     Pp.  22. 

Holyoke  National  Bank.  "Holyoke  Na- 
tional Way"  of  Solving  the  Housing 
Problem.  Holyoke,  Mass.:  J.  H. 
Fifield.     Pp.  29. 

Hubbard,  S.  D.  Industrial  Medicine. 
New  York:  N.Y.  City  Department  of 
Health.    Pp.  10. 

.  Some  Fallacies  Regarding  Nar- 
cotic Drug  Addiction.  New  York: 
N.Y.  (city)  Department  of  Health. 
Pp.  12. 

Indiana  Department  of  Public  Instruc- 
tion. School  as  the  Center  of 
Community  Life.  Indianapolis:  De- 
partment of  Public  Instruction.  Pp. 
31- 

Janes,  George  M.  Robert  Owen — Social 
Dreamer.  University,  N.D.:  The 
University  of  North  Dakota.    Pp.  5. 

Johnson,  Wm.  E.  Prohibition  in  Kansas. 
Westerville,  Ohio:  American  Issue 
Publishing  Co.    Pp.  86. 

.  The  South  Carolina  Liquor  Dis- 
pensary. Westerville,  Ohio:  Ameri- 
can Issue  Publishing  Co.     Pp.  28. 

Kahn,  Otto  H.  Some  Suggestions  on 
Tax  Revision.  New  York:  The 
Author,  52  William  St.     Pp.  75. 

Kelley,  Florence.  Wage-Earning  Women 
in  War  Time,  the  Textile  Industry. 
New  Y'ork:  National  Consumers 
League,  44  E.  23d  S.     Pp.  23. 

Lagarrigue,  Luis.  Question  Sociale. 
Santiago  de  Chili:  Soc.  Imprenta  y 
Litografia.  Universe,  Galerio  Ales- 
sandri  20.     Pp.  25. 

Lloj'd,  E.  F.  Closed  Union  Shop  versus 
the  Open  Shop.  New  York:  Nat'i 
Industrial  Conference  Bd.,  10  E. 
39th  St.     Pp.27.    So.75- 

McCaustland,  E.  J.  Water  Supply  and 
Sewage  Disposal  for  Country  Homes. 
Columbia,  Mo.:  Missouri  Univ.  Eng. 
E.xp.  Sta.     Pp.  36. 


540 


THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 


MacDonald,  Arthur.  Anthropology  of 
Modern  Civilized  Man.  Denver, 
Colo.:    Western  Medical  Times.     Pp. 

12. 

Magistrates'  Courts  of  New  York.  The 
Progress  of  Probation.  New  York: 
Board  of  City  Magistrates.     Pp.  36. 

Maine  Charities  and  Corporations.  Pub- 
lic (state)  Appropriation  to  Institu- 
tions Not  Owned  or  Controlled  by  the 
State.  Augusta:  The  Charities.  Pp.  2. 

Massachusetts  Bureau  of  Immigration. 
Immigrant  Races  in  Massachusetts: 
The  Greeks.  Boston:  The  Bureau. 
Pp.  6. 

McSweeney,  E.  F.  De-Americanizing 
Young  America.  Boston :  The  Author, 
55  Congress  St.    Pp.  16. 

Minnesota  Bureau  of  Women  and  Chil- 
dren. Women  in  Industry  in  Min- 
nesota in  19 18:  Field  Investigation. 
St.  Paul:  The  Bureau.     Pp.  36. 

National  Board  of  Review  for  Motion 
Pictures.  Partial  list  of  film  subjects 
on  health,  disease,  nursing,  and  allied 
topics.  70  Fifth  Ave.,  New  York. 
Pp.  3.    $0.10. 

.  Pictures  Boys  Want  and  Grown- 
ups Endorse.  New  York:  The  Board. 
Pp.  3.     $0.10. 

.     Objections  to  State  Censorship  of 

Motion  Pictures.  New  York:  The 
Board.     Pp.  5. 

.    A  Motion  Picture  Problem  Solved : 

Constructive  Community  Programs  for 
Young  People.  New  York:  The  Board. 
Pp.4.    $0.05. 

.     Best  Motion  Pictures  for  Church 

and  Semi-Religious  Entertainments. 
New  York:  The  Board.    Pp.5.    $0.10. 

National  Safety  Council.  Blast  Fur- 
naces. Chicago:  National  Safety 
Council.     Pp.  16.     $0.25. 

National  Women's  Trade  Union  League 
of  America.  Strike  of  the  Steel 
Workers:  A  Few  Facts  in  the  Ninth 
Week  of  the  Strike.  New  York: 
The  League,  129  E.  S2d  St.     Pp.  8. 

Nearing,  Scott.  A  Nation  Divided,  or 
Plutocracy  vs.  Democracy.  Chicago: 
Socialist  Party  of  the  U.S.,  220 
S.  Ashland  Blvd.     Pp.  32. 

Newman,  Bernard  J.  Joint  Industrial 
Relations  Plan  for  Small  Industries. 
Chicago:  Modern  Hospital  Pub.  Co. 

New  York  Community  Trust.  New 
York  Community  Trust.  New  York: 
The  Trust,  55  Cedar  St.     Pp.  16. 

New  York  State  Probation  Commission. 
Thirteenth  Annual  Report.  Albany: 
The  Commission.     Pp.  560. 


New  York  State  Industrial  Commission, 
Bureau  of  Women  in  Industry.  Report 
of  the  Telephone  Industry.  Albany: 
The  Commission.     Pp.  95. 

Odell,  J.  H.  Demonstrations  in  the 
Reality  of  Democracy.  Wilmington: 
Service  Citizens  of  Delaware.     Pp.  37. 

Odum,  Howard  W.  Constructive  Ven- 
tures in  Government.  A  Manual  of 
Discussion  and  Study  of  Woman's  New 
Part  in  the  Newer  Ideals  of  Citizenship. 
Chapel  Hill,  N.C.:  The  Bureau  of  Ex- 
tension, Univeristy  of  North  Carolina. 

Pp-  95- 

Office  de  Statistique  de  la  Republique 
Tch6coslovaque.  Manuel  Statistique 
de  la  R6publique  Tch^coslovaque. 
Prague:  25  couronnes  tchecoslovaques. 
Pp.  iv-fio5. 

O'Hare,  K.  R.  In  Prison.  Box  1033, 
St.  Louis:  The  Author.  Pp.  64. 
$0.25. 

Patton,  Cornelius  D.     Christian  America 

in  the  New  World:  An  Interpretation 

of  the  Interchurch  World  Movement. 

New  York:  Interchurch  World  Move- 

,  ment,  45  W.  i8th  St.     Pp.  27. 

People's  Freedom  Union.  The  Truth 
about  the  Lusk  Committee.  New 
York:    Nation  Press.     Pp.29.    $0.25. 

Proceedings  of  International  Confer- 
ence of  Women  Physicians.  New 
York:  The  Woman's  Press,  600  Lex- 
ington Ave.     Pp.  6. 

Real  Estate  Board  of  New  York.  Recom- 
mendations on  Legislation  to  Relieve 
the  Housing  Shortage.  New  York: 
The  Board.     217  Broadwaj'.     Pp.  11. 

Rhein,  L.  J.  Peace  in  Industry.  Two 
Rivers,  Wis.:  The  Author.     Pp.  57. 

Rockefeller  Foundation.  A  Review  for 
1919.  Public  Health  and  Medical 
Education  in  Many  Lands.  New 
York:  The  Foundation.     Pp.  44. 

Roundy,  R.  W.  The  Negro:  An  Asset  of 
the  American  Nation.  New  York: 
Home  Missions  Council.     Pp.  16. 

Russell  Sage  Foundation  Library.  Juve- 
nile Delinquency.  New  York:  The 
Library.     Pp.4.    $0.10. 

Russell,  George  W.  The  Economics  of 
Ireland  and  the  Policy  of  the  British 
Government.  New  York:  Huebsch. 
Pp.32.    $0.25. 

Salmon,  T.  W.  Future  of  Psychiatry 
in  the  Army.  New  York:  National 
Committee  for  Mental  Hygiene.     Pp. 

34. 

.     Psychiatric    Lessons     from    the 

War.     New    York:     National    Com- 
mittee for  Mental  Hygiene.    Pp.  3. 


RECENT  LITERATURE 


541 


Salmon,  T.  W.  Some  New  Problems 
for  Psyciatric  Research  in  Delinquency. 
New  York:  National  Committee  for 
Mental  Hygiene.     Pp.  14. 

Service  Citizens  of  Delaware,  Bulletin. 
Americanization  in  Delaware  19 19- 
1920.  Wilmington:  The  Citizens. 
Pp.  77. 

Shideler,  Ernest  H.  A  Course  in  Modern 
Social  Problems  for  the  High  School. 
Chicago:  University  of  Chicago  Press. 
Pp.  II. 

Sioux  City,  Iowa,  Public  Library. 
Hospital  Library  Service:  A  New 
Department  of  Public  Library  Work. 
SioiLx  City:  The  Librar}'.     Pp.  7. 

Social  Service  Commission  of  Los 
Angeles.  Annual  Report,  July  i, 
1918,  to  July  I,  1919.     Pp.  40. 

South  Carolina  State  Board  of  Public 
Welfare.  Functions  and  Relations  of 
the  Board  of  Public  Welfare.  Colum- 
bia: The  Board.     Pp.  28. 

Southard,  E.  E.  Fimctions  of  a  Psycho- 
pathic Hospital.  New  York:  Nat'l 
Com.   for  Mental  Hygiene.     Pp.   16. 

.     Movement  for  a  Mental  Hygiene 

for  Industr>-.  New  York:  National 
Committee  for  Mental  Hygiene.  Pp. 
22. 

Spaulding,  E.  R.  Three  Cases  of  Lar- 
ceny in  Which  the  Antisocial  Behavior 
Appeared  to  Represent  an  Effort  to 
Compensate  for  Emotional  Repression. 
New  York:  National  Committee  for 
National  Hygiene.     Pp.  21. 

Stillman,  Gladys.  Hot  Lunches  in  Rural 
Schools.  Madison,  Wis.:  Wis.  Uni- 
versity College  of  Agriculture  Exten- 
sion Service.     Pp.  16. 

Stone,  L.  A.  Are  Children  Getting  a 
Square  Deal  ?  Chicago :  The  Author, 
1208  Montrose  Blvd.     Pp.  15. 

Texas  Board  of  Health.  How  to  Build 
and  Maintain  Approved  T>'pes  of 
Improved  Privies  for  Rural  Districts 
and  Towns  without  Sewer  Connec- 
tions.    Austin:  The  Board.     Pp.  12. 

Tolstoy,  Leo.  A  Great  Iniquity. 
Translated  by  V.  Tchertkoff  and 
I.  F.  Mayo.  New  York:  Huebsch. 
Pp.38.     $0.25. 

Torlai,  Ubaldo.  La  Misura  Interna- 
zionale.  Bologna:  Coop.  Tipografica 
Azzoguidi.     1919.     Pp.  31. 

United  States  Bureau  of  Education. 
Community  Americanization :  A  Hand- 
book for  Workers.  By  F.  C.  Butler. 
Washington:  Govt.  Ptg.  Office.    Pp.  77. 

.  Motion  Picture  Films  of  Educa- 
tional   Value    in    the    Possession    of 


Associations  and  Commercial  and 
Manufacturing  Companies:  Govt.  Ptg. 
Office.     Pp.  12. 

.     State  Americanization:  The  Part 

of  the  State  in  the  Education  and 
Assimilation  of  the  Immigrant.  By 
F.  C.  Butler.  Washington:  Govt. 
Ptg.  Office.     Pp.  26. 

United  States  Bureau  of  Industrial  Hous- 
ing and  Transportation.  Report  of 
the  United  States  Housing  Corpora- 
tion. Vol.  I.  Organization,  Policies, 
Transactions.  Washington :  Govt. 
Ptg.  Office.     Pp.  x-j-391. 

United  States  Bureau  of  Labor  Statistics. 
Decisions  of  Courts  and  Opinions 
Affecting  Labor,  1918.  By  L.  D. 
Clarke  and  M.  C.  Frincke,  Jr.  Wash- 
ington: Govt.  Ptg.  Office.     Pp.  236. 

.    Historical  Survey  of  International 

Action  Affecting  Labor.  Washington: 
Govt.  Ptg.  Office.    Pp.  V-I-291.   $0.25. 

.    Wages  and  Hours  of  Labor  in 

Woolen  and  Worsted  Goods  Manufac- 
turing, 1918.  Washington:  Govt. 
Ptg.  Office. 

United  States  Children's  Bureau.  Chil- 
dren's Year.  A  brief  sunmiary  of  work 
done  and  suggestions  for  follow-up 
work.  Washington:  Govt.  Ptg.  Office. 
Pp.  15. 

.     Child-Welfare  Programs.     Study 

outlines  for  the  use  of  clubs  and  classes. 
Washington:  Govt.  Ptg.  Office.  Pp. 
32. 

.     State  Commissions  for  the  Study 

and  Revision  of  Child  Welfare  Laws. 
Washington:    Govt.  Ptg.  Office.     Pp. 

43- 

United  States  Department  of  Agricul- 
ture. Home  Laundering.  Washing- 
ton:  Govt.  Ptg.  Office.     Pp.  29. 

United  States  Department  of  State. 
Memorandum  on  the  Bolshevist  or 
Communist  Party  in  Russia  and  Its 
Relation  to  the  Third  or  Conmaunist 
International  and  to  the  Russian  So- 
viets. Washington:  Govt.  Ptg.  Office. 
Pp.  46. 

United  States  House  Committee  on  Im- 
migration and  Naturalization.  De- 
portation cases  of  William  T.  and  Amy 
Colyer.  Apply  to  Congressman.  Pp. 
58. 

United  States  Public  Health  Ser\dce. 
Case  against  the  Red  Light  District. 
Washington:   Govt.  Ptg.  Office.   Pp.8. 

.  Control  of  Communicable  Dis- 
eases. Washington:  Govt.  Ptg.  Office. 
Pp.  32. 


542 


THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 


United    States    Public    Health    Service. 

Keeping    Tab    on    Sickness    in    the 

Plant.    Washington:  Govt. Ptg. OflSce. 

Pp.8. 
United  States  Women's  Bureau.    Night 

Work    Laws    in    the    United    States. 

Washington :  Govt.  Ptg.  Office.   Pp.  4. 
Wadsworth,  Elliot.     Economic  Chaos  in 

Mid- Eastern     Europe.      New     York: 

The  New  York  Times.    Pp.  42. 


White,  J.  D.  Is  There  an  Eighteenth 
Amendment?  Ithaca,  N.Y.:  Cornell 
University.     Pp.  15. 

Willett,  Allan  H.  Industrial  Survey  in 
Selected  Industries  in  the  United 
States,  1919.  Preliminary  Report. 
Washington:  Govt. Ptg. Office.  Pp.  509. 

Woodbur>%  R.  M.  Industrial  Insta- 
bility of  Child  Workers.  Washington: 
Govt.  Ptg.  Office.    Pp.  86. 


ARTICLES 


Abelson,  A.  R.  The  Psychology  of  the 
Delinquent  Child.  The  Child  10:529, 
Sept.  '20. 

Allen,  W.  E.  D.  Armenios:  su  pasado 
y  su  porvenir.  La  ref.  soc.  17:151- 
158  June  '20. 

Andrews,  Hazel  M.  Vocational  and 
Moral  Guidance  through  Dramatics. 
Education  41 :  123,  Oct.  '20. 

A  Phase  of  the  Racial  Problem  in  South 
Africa;  Transition  from  Tribalism  to 
Individualism.  Geog.  Rev.  10:346, 
Nov.  '20, 

Attitude  of  Medical  Society  of  the  State 
of  New  York  toward  Compulsory 
Health  Insurance.  Mo.  Lab.  Rev. 
10:255-58,  Jan. '20. 

Aurousseau,  M.  Arrangement  of  Rural 
Populations.  Geog.  Rev.  10:223, 
Oct.  '20. 

BarroU,  Jessie  L.  Americanization. 
Am.  Ed.  24:70,  Oct.  '20. 

Bellini,  Luigi.  II  contratto  di  lavoro  e  la 
sua  legge.  Riv.  inteml.  de  sci.  soc. 
82:33-70,  Jan.  '20. 

Belot,  Gustave.  Les  territoires  a  plebis- 
cite. La  paix  par  le  droit.  88, 
Mar.-Apr.  '20. 

Below,  G.  V.  Romantik  u.  realistische 
Geschichtsforshung.  Vierteljahrsschrift 
f .  Sozial- u.  Wirtschaftsgesch.  i.  Sept., 
1919,  S.  82. 

Benton,  Guy  Potter.  What  the  War  Has 
Contributed  towards  Teaching  Citi- 
zenship. Journal  of  Education  92:143 
Aug.  26,  '20. 

Bernard,  L.  L.  The  Function  of  Gener- 
alization.   Monist  30: 623-31,  Oct.  '20. 

Bierling,  Ernst.  Der  Staat  als  Lcbens- 
form.  Z.  f.  d.  ges.  Staatswiss.  i. 
&  2.  Heft,  1920. 

Bottcher,  Oberr.-R.     Berufsberatung  fUr 

gsychopathische  Jugendliche  167. 
eiheft  z.  "Zeitschrift  fiir  Kinder- 
forsch."  Langensalza.  H.  Beyer  & 
Sohnc. 


Bouasse,  H.  De  la  formation  des 
theories  et  de  leur  transformation  prag- 
matique.    Scientia  28:253-69,  Oct.'2o. 

Brinkmann,  Carl.  Begriff  u.  Aufgabe 
einer  gesch.  Staatenkimde.  Schmol- 
ler's  Jahrbuch,    i.  Heft,  1920.    S.  191. 

Burchenal,  E.  Folk  Dancing  as  Social 
Recreation.  Playground.  14:404- 
16,  Oct.  '20. 

Coote,  C.  R.  Is  Industrial  Peace  Pos- 
sible? 19th  Cent,  and  After  88:450- 
61,  Sept.  '20. 

Cox,  Harold.  Population  and  Progress. 
Edinb.  Rev.  232:396-408,  Oct.  '20. 

Curtis,  Winterton  C.  Unionization  from 
the  Standpoint  of  a  University  Teacher. 
Ed.  Rev.  60:91,  Sept.  '20. 

Dietrich,  Oberreg.-R.,  Dr.  Beobach- 
tungsheime  fiir  jugendliche  Psycho- 
pathen.  165.  Beiheft  z.  "Zeitschrift 
fiir  Kinderforschung."  Langensalza. 
H.  Bej^er  &  Sohne. 

Dupr6-Fagman,  Dr.  Inspection  Femi- 
nine. Rev.  philan.  41 :  95-96,  Mar.  15, 
'20. 

E.  B.  La  journ6e  de  huit  heures. — Les 
salaires  et  la  production.  Jour,  des 
6con.  66: 213-16,  May  '20. 

Eustace,  Percy.  Les  bases  nationales  de 
rinternationalisme.  Rev.  pol.  internl. 
13-32.     Jan. '20. 

Fehlinger,  Hans.  Die  Kriminalitat  in 
den  Vereinigten  Staaten  von  Amerika, 
Arch.  f.  Krim.  Band  71,  2  &  3.  Heft, 
S.  170. 

.     Der    Familiengerichtshof.    Z.   f. 

Sexualwiss.,  Sept.  '20. 

Feld,  W.  Vom  Altersabstand  der  Ehe- 
gatten.     Z.  f.  Sozialwiss.   July,  1920.  _ 

Fess,  Simeon  D.  Government  and  Citi- 
zenship; Individual  Responsibility  and 
Americanization.  Journal  of  Educa- 
tion 92:285,  Sept.  30,  '20. 

Fisher,  V.  Labour  Evolution  and  Social 
Revolution.  19th  Cent,  and  After 
88:595-606,  Oct.  '20. 


RECENT  LITERATURE 


543 


Foreign-born  and  Negro  Population  of 

the  United  States;  Distribution  of  the 

Population  by  Age  and  Sex.     Sci.  Mo. 

11:284,  Sept.  '20. 
Foster,     W.     H.    Values     of     Motion 

Pictures.    Sch.  &  Home  Ed.  40:43, 

Oct.  '20. 
Fox,  J.  Tylor,  M.D.     The  Care  of  the 

Epileptic  Child.    The  Child   10:492, 

Aug.  '20. 
Fry,  C.  Luther.    Migratory  Workers  of 

Our  Industries.    World's  Work  40: 600, 

Oct.  '20. 
Fryer,  Mrs.  Claud.     Girl  Guides  and  the 

Welfare  of  the  Defective  Girl.    The 

Child  11: 1,  Oct.  '20. 
Garner,    R.  L.    The   Religion  of  Afri- 
can   Cannibals.      Forum    64:305-14, 

Nov.  '20. 
GilFillan,  S.  C.    The  Coldward  Course  of 

Progress.     Pol.  Sci.  Quar.  3S:393-4io> 

Sept.  '20. 
Gompers,  Samuel.     Collective  Bargain- 
ing.    Am.   Federationist.     27:258-61, 

Mar.  '20. 
Gonnard,  Ren6.    La  Hongrie  de  demain. 

Rev.     pol.     et    parlem.    102:389-97, 

Mar.  10,  '20. 
Gordon,    Ruth    M.    Has    Mysticism   a 

Moral  Value?    Internl.  Jour.  Ethics 

31:66-87,  Oct. '20. 
Grannattasio,     Francesco.      II    sistema 

della  proprieta  nella  legislazione  com- 

munistica  della  Russia.     Riv.  internl. 

de  sci.  sec.  83:145-56,  July  '20. 
Gregor,  Adalb.,  Dr.     Zur  Bestimmimg  d. 

Intelligenzalters    mittels    der    Defini- 

tionsmethode.     169  Beiheft.  z.  "Zeit- 

schrift    fur    Kinderforsche. "    Langen- 

salza,  H.  Berger  imd  Sohne. 
GriUi,  Carlo.     Scienza  sociale  e  lettera- 

tura.     Riv.  internl.  de  sci.  soc.  828: 

169-80,  '20. 
Grumbine,  H.  C.     Reaction  of  a  Lay- 
man    to     Psychoanalysis.     Scribner's 

68:602-61,  Nov.  '20. 
Harris,    D.    Eraser,    Dr.    The   Medical 

and    Allied    Professions    as    a    State 

Service.     Scien.  Mo.  11:235,  Sept.  '20. 
Horch,  Geh.  Justizrat,  Dr.   Zur  Frage  der 

sexuellen    Verwahrlosung    im  Kriege. 

Zeitschr.  f.  Sexualwiss.,  July  '20. 
Hoyt,   Homer.     The  Housing   Shortage 

and  the  Supply  of  Building  Materials. 

Ann. Am.  Acad.  Pol.  Soc.  Sci.  89 :  76-73, 

May  '20. 
Jenny,  FrM6ric.     Comment  "mobiliser" 

la    dette    allemande?    rev.     pol.    et 

parlem.  io3:i7c>-79,  May  10,  '20. 
Jorgensen,    Hakon,    Dr.     Die    Zentral- 

polizeischule    in    Danemark.     Archiv 


fiir  Kriminologie.    Bd.  71,  2.  &  3.  Heft, 
S.  127. 

Kelsen,  Hans.  Vom  Wesen  u.  Wert  d. 
Demokratie.  Archiv  d.  Sozialwiss.  u. 
Sozialpolitik.    47  B.,  i.  Heft,  S.  50. 

Kiesel,  W.,  Dr.  Das  Ausdrucksproblem 
in  der  Kriminahstik.  Band  72,  i. 
Heft,  S.  i.    Archiv  fUr  Kriminologie. 

Koehne,  Karl.  Studien  z.  Geschichte 
d.  blauen  Montags.  Zeitschr.  fiir  Sozi- 
alwissenschaft,  July   and  Aug.  '20. 

Kohler,  Joseph,  Dr.  Der  Zwang  zum 
Fingerabdruck.  Archiv  fiir  Krimi- 
nologie.    Band  71,  i.  Heft  S.  '19. 

Kohs,  S.  C.  The  School  as  an  Agency 
in  Preventing  Social  Liabilities.  Sch. 
and  Society  12:325-30,  Oct.  '20. 

Kramer,  Dr.  Psychopathische  Veran- 
lagung  und  StraSalligkeit  im  Jugend- 
alter.  162.  Beiheft  z.  " Zeitschrif t  f iir 
Kinderforschung."  Langensalza,  H. 
Beyer  und  Sohne. 

Le  Conte,  Rene.  Congregations  pro- 
testantes  et  soci^tes  communistes  alle- 
mandes  aux  Etats-Unis.  Rev.  internl. 
sociol.  28:358-73,  July  '20. 

Le  Faivre,  Paul.  De  quelques  grands 
interets  franjais  dans  le  pays  rhe- 
nans.     Ref.  Soc.  9:273-99,  May  '20. 

Leonard,  Eugenie  Anduers.  A  Parent's 
Study  of  Children's  Lies.  Ped.  Sem. 
27:105,  June  '20. 

Lescure,  Jean.  Faut-il  detruire  la 
Turquie  ?  Rev.  pol.  et  parlem.  103 : 
42-48,  Apr.  10,  '20. 

Levinson,  A.  Infant  Welfare  Affected 
by  Class  Distinction  and  National 
Traits.  Mod.  Med.  2:650-53,  Oct. 
'20. 

Lewisohn,  S.  A.  Industrial  Leadership 
and  the  Manager.  Atlantic  126:414- 
18,  Sept.  '20. 

Lichtenberger,  Andr6.  La  Pologne  eco- 
nomique  et  sociale.  Le  Musee  soc. 
103-30,  May  '20. 

Lichtenberger,  Henri.  L'Allemagne  nou- 
velle.    Scientia  27:145-58,  Feb.  '20. 

Lichtheim,  Richard.  Die  Heimkehr  der 
Juden.  Die  Zukunft  7.  Aug.  '20, 
S.  163. 

Lindsey,  Hon.  Ben  B.  Recommenda- 
tions and  Report  of  Chairman  Juve- 
nile Court,  Dept.  of  National  Congress 
of  Mothers  and  Parent-Teacher  Asso- 
ciation. Child  Wei.  Mag.  15:26, 
Oct.  '20. 

London's  Children.  Annual  Report  of 
the  County  Medical  Officer  of  Health. 
The  Child  11:18,  Oct.  '20. 


544 


THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 


Lathrop,  Julia  C.  Child  Welfare  Stand- 
ards.   The  Child  10:502,  Aug.  '20. 

Lovejoy,  Arthur  O.  Pragmatism  as 
Interactionism.  Jour.  Phil.  Psy.  and 
Sci.  Methods  17:589-96,  Oct.  21, 
'20. 

.    Teachers  and  Trade-Unions.    Ed. 

Rev.  60: 106,  Sept.  '20. 

Lowrie,  S.  G.  The  Social  Unit — An 
Experiment  in  Politics.  Nat.  Mun. 
Rev.  9:553-66,  Sept.  '20. 

Lyman,  Eugene  W.  The  Ethics  of  the 
Wages  and  Profits  System.  Internl. 
Jour.  Ethics  31:93-108,  Oct.  '20. 

Macassey,  L.  The  Labour  Party  and  Its 
Policy.  Quar.  Rev.  234:317-37,  Oct. 
'20. 

MacBride,  E.  W.  The  Method  of  Evo- 
lution.    Scientia  28: 23-34,  July  '20. 

Mangin,  General.  Comment  finit  la 
Guerre  III,  191 7.  Rev.  de  deux 
Mon.  57:241-85,  May  15, '20. 

Mann,  A.  R.  Co-operative  Commimity 
Building.  So.  Workman  49:364-77, 
Aug.  '20. 

Meuge,  Edward  J.  Darwinism,  Mili- 
tarism, Socialism,  and  Bolshevism  in 
the  Universities.  Education  4i:73> 
Oct.  '20. 

Michels,  Roberto.  La  sociologie  de 
Venise  dans  I'apres-guerre.  Rev. 
internl.  sociol.  28:124-31,  Mar.  '20. 

Miller,  S.  The  Prison  as  an  Asset. 
Survey  45:157-59.  Oct.  '20. 

Moult,  Thomas.  Labor  and  Culture. 
Eng.  Rev.  31:77-80,  July  '20. 

Myers,  G.  C.  Some  Pioneer  Problems 
Worked  Out  with  Illiterates.  Educa- 
tion 41:  29,  Sept.  '20. 

Parsons,  Helen  T.  New  York  Child 
Health  Conference:  Impressions  and 
Reactions.  Journal  of  Home  Eco- 
nomics 12:354,  Aug.  '20. 

Paton,  Stewart,  Dr.  Democracy's  Op- 
portunity. Scien.  Mo.  11:254,  Sept. 
'20. 

Pearson,  Karl.  The  Problems  of  An- 
thropology. Sci.  Mo.  11:451,  Nov. 
'20. 

Phillips,  Daniel  E.  The  School  as  a 
Community  Force.  Am.  Ed.  24:60, 
Oct.  '20. 


PickcU.      Training 

through  Practice, 

Sept.  '20. 
Piloty,   Robt.,  Dr. 

schaft.     Arch,    f 

schaftsphil.  13.    Bd.,  Heft  2  &  3,  S.  98. 
Population  of  the  United  States  in  1920; 

Distribution  of  Population.     Sci.  Mo. 

11:474,  Nov.  '20. 


for       Citizenship 
Sch.  Rev.  28:518, 

Politik  als  Wissen- 
Rechts-    u.    Wirt- 


Princess  Cantacuzene.     Relief  for  Rus- 
sian Children.     Child  Welf.  Mag.  15:7, 

Sept.  '20. 
Pritchard,  Erie,  M.D.    The  Care  of  the 

Blind  Baby.    The  Child  10:537,  Sept. 

'20. 
Proctor,    T.    H.    The    Motives   of   the 

Soldier.    Intern.  Jour.  Ethics  31:26- 

50,  Oct.  '20. 
Reymert,  Martin  L.     Questionnaire  for 

the   Observation   of   a    Young    Child 

from    Birth   to   Two   Years   of   Age. 

Ped.  Sem.  27:200,  June  '20. 
Russell,    Bertrand.      Bolshevik  Theory. 

New  Rep.  24:296-98,  Nov.  17,  '20. 
Russell,     James     E.    Organization     of 

Teachers.     Ed.  Rev.  60: 129,  Sept.  '20. 
Salomon,  A.     Social  Service  in  Germany 

Today.     Survey  44:664-67,  Sept.  '20. 
Sato,  K.     Changing  Status  of  Japanese 

Women.    Jap.  Rev.  5:316,  Sept.  '20, 
.     Labor  Conditions  in  Japan.     Jap. 

Rev.  5:289,  Aug.  '20. 
Schumacher,  Hermann.     Gegenwartsfra- 

gen     des     Sozialismus.      Schmoller's 

Jahrbuch.     i.  Heft,  1920,  S.  i. 
Simmons,  D.  R.    Labor  Unions  Help  in 

Japanese    Industrial    Problems.    Am. 

Federationist  27:244-45,  Mar.  '20. 
Stem,  Erich.     Probleme  der  Kulturpsy- 

chologie,     Z.  d.    ges.    Staatswiss.     3. 

Heft,  '20. 
Strachey,  J.  S.  L.    The  Mechanism  of 

Revolution.     19th    Cent,    and    After 

88:582-92,' Oct.  '20. 
Strobl,     K.     H.     Der    Tscheche.     Eine 

volkerpsychologische         Betrachtung. 

Deutsche  Revue,  July  and  Aug.  '20. 
Trigg,  Ernest  T.     Housing  and  Building 

Conditions.     Ann.  Am.  Acad.  Pol.  Soc. 

Sci.  89:74-77,  May  '20. 
Van  Gaasbeek,  Richard  M.    An  Exaniple 

of    Efficient    Vocational     Education. 

Industrial  Arts  Magazine  9:389,  Oct. 

'20. 


Walton,    Dorothy. 

tion  Has  Its  Say. 

88-91,  Mar.  '20. 
Wiese,  v.,  Leopold. 


Vocational    Educa- 
Life  and  Labor  10: 

Soziolozie  als  Ein- 

zelwissenschaft.  Schmoller's  Jahrbuch. 

2.  Heft,  '20,  S.  31. 
Wilbois,  J.     Introduction  i  la  sociologie. 

Rev.  de  m^taphys.  et  de  morale  27: 

471-94,  Oct.  '20. 
Wilson,  Woodrow.    James  Monroe,  pr6- 

sident    des    Etats-Unis    d'Am<!rique. 

Rev.  internl.  sociol.  28:1-22,  Jan.  '20. 
Yves-Guyot.    Les  rapports  de  la  Chine 

et  des  6trangers.     Rev.  6con.  internl. 

3:27-57,  Aug.  '20. 


THE  AMERICAN 

JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 


Volume  XXVI  MARCH     I92O  Nitmber  5 


SOME  AMBIGUITIES  IN  ''DEMOCRACY" 


HERBERT  L.  STEWART 
Dalhousie  University- 


Sir  John  Seeley  once  remarked  about  the  word  "liberty"  that 
a  political  speaker  must  use  it  at  least  once  in  each  address,  because 
otherwise  the  audience  would  not  know  when  to  applaud,  A 
different  stimulant  for  the  lethargic  Hstener  is  now  employed. 
A  different  talisman  serves  the  purpose  of  platform  conjuring. 
*' Democracy"  bids  fair  to  succeed  to  the  almost  vacant  place  of 
"Hberty"  as  the  most  hackneyed,  the  most  ill-defined,  and  hence 
the  most  meaningless  term  of  pubHc  debate.  The  less  famihar 
watchwords  at  least  commit  one  to  something.  But  an  election 
candidate  in  search  of  an  elastic  label  beneath  which  any  attitude 
under  the  sun  may  find  shelter  had  best  ring  the  changes  upon 
*' democratic." 

One  reason  why  this  epithet  has  come  to  mean  so  little  is  that 
we  have  struggled  to  make  it  mean  so  much.  The  Greeks,  who 
invented  it,  were  not  bothered  with  its  present  ambiguities,  for 
they  knew  what  they  had  chosen  it  to  stand  for,  and  they  adhered 
to  this.  But  we  of  the  modern  age,  in  our  zeal  to  have  a  single 
word  as  the  most  convenient  weapon  to  brandish,  have  forced  into 
this  word  every  aim  which  our  own  side  has  promoted  and  the  other 
side  has  opposed  in  the  great  conflict  of  ideals.  To  prove  a  thing 
evil  we  assume  as  sufficient  that  we  should  prove  it  undemocratic. 
In  defending  what  has  been  so  stigmatized  we  feel  that  the  case  is 

545 


546  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

hopeless  if  we  cannot  remove  this  initial  objection,  so  that  by 
hook  or  by  crook,  though  we  should  burst  the  English  language  in 
our  effort,  we  must  prove  the  damnatory  adjective  to  have  been 
misappUed.  If  we  want  to  reform  anything,  we  place  our  chief 
reliance  on  the  argument  that  our  plan  will  still  further  democra- 
tize what  we  have  set  out  to  mend.  Thus  we  have  become  almost 
afraid  even  to  raise  the  question  whether  this  purpose  in  state- 
craft is  not,  like  all  other  purposes,  a  thing  of  limited  scope,  whose 
special  advantage  may  be  missed  by  our  having  too  much  of  it 
not  less  surely  than  by  our  having  too  little.  Our  experience  of 
the  Bolsheviki  has  indeed  opened  the  eyes  of  a  few.  But  even 
this  is  being  explained  away.  Enthusiasts  are  emphasizing  the 
difference  between  "true"  and  "false"  democracy,  just  as  they 
used  to  split  hairs  about  "liberty"  and  "license,"  for  they  are 
pledged  to  exhibit  the  system  they  idealize  as  free  from  all  imper- 
fections whatever.  They  therefore  contend  that,  while  its  plausible 
counterfeit  may  be  bad,  the  real  brand  will  bring  unmLxed  bless- 
ings. It  is  thus  spoken  of  as  if  it  were  not  merely  good  govern- 
ment, not  merely  the  best  government,  but  the  just  goverimient 
made  perfect,  and  the  implication  is  that  if  we  seek  democracy  all 
other  things  will  be  added  unto  us.  Yet  it  is  surely  plain  that  such 
unqualified  panegyric  can  be  deserved  by  no  human  arrangement. 
As  Dr.  P.  T.  Forsyth  would  say,  the  purpose  of  the  universe  is  not 
definable  in  a  formula  which  undergraduates  can  easily  remember. 

How  many  senses  of  this  term  can  we  distinguish  in  current 
usage  ?  At  least  three.  They  are  not,  indeed,  independent  senses, 
and  we  may  find  that  they  rest  on  a  common  basis  of  principle. 
But  they  are  sufficiently  different  to  make  it  worth  while  for  us  to 
distinguish  them, 

a)  The  first  is  the  sense  of  equality.  When  Martin  Chuzzlewit 
landed  in  New  York  one  of  the  earliest  things  impressed  upon  him 
was  that  no  such  relation  as  "master  and  servant"  was  there 
recognized.  A  mere  matter  of  names  is,  of  course,  of  little  impor- 
tance. What  is  important  is  the  determination  in  the  New  World, 
both  in  the  United  States  and  in  Canada,  to  allow  nothing  that  has 
the  shape  of  birth  privilege,  and  to  insist  as  far  as  possible  that  all 
men  shall  have  the  same  civic  opportunity.     One  saw  an  example 


SOME  AMBIGUITIES  IN  "DEMOCRACY''  547 

of  this  lately  in  Canada  when  the  rumor  of  a  large  consignment  of 
decorative  titles,  some  of  them  transmissible  from  father  to  son, 
called  forth  in  the  House  of  Commons  a  very  fierce  and  probably 
a  very  decisive  protest.  Whatever  else  the  man  in  the  street  means 
when  he  calls  himself  democratic,  he  at  least  means  to  avow  a 
mood  of  permanent  irritability  toward  all  social  or  caste  arrogance. 
But  this  meaning  is  negative  rather  than  positive.  It  states  a  posi- 
tion in  terms  not  of  what  one  approves  but  of  what  one  condemns. 

b)  Again,  a  democratic  order  is  thought  of  as  one  in  which 
individual  preferences  must  yield  to  the  collective  will.  What 
the  nation  has  clearly  purposed  each  citizen  is  called  upon  to 
promote.  Majority  rule  means  minority  submissiveness.  Thus  a 
bill  may  be  opposed  at  every  stage  in  the  American  Congress  by 
every  constitutional  weapon,  but  once  it  has  become  the  law  of  the 
land  it  is  undemocratic  to  obstruct  the  enforcement.  Words  and 
acts  that  were  permissible  before  the  entry  of  the  United  States 
into  the  war  became  treason  to  the  American  democracy  the 
moment  that  step  had  been  taken.  The  draft  law  ceased  to  be  a 
legitimate  subject  for  debate  as  soon  as  it  had  been  signed  by  the 
President,  for  to  question  its  propriety  was  to  imperil  its  effective- 
ness. It  is  but  the  extreme  statement  of  this  principle  when  one 
hears  the  jest  that  all  sides  in  a  presidential  election  are  expected 
when  the  result  is  known  to  agree  that  the  best  man  has  been 
chosen.  Imbued  with  this  spirit  we  hear  with  amazement  of  a 
Home-Rule  Act  for  Ireland,  duly  passed  after  ample  discussion  in 
the  Imperial  Parliament,  yet  allowed  to  remain  a  dead  letter  because 
three  or  four  counties  have  sworn  to  resist  it  unto  blood.  For  the 
insurgent  few  declare  in  the  same  breath  that  they  look  upon  the 
wisdom  of  king,  lords,  and  commons  as  the  one  authority  which 
should  claim  their  allegiance !  Many  of  us  feel  that  the  deplorable 
resolve  of  other  Irish  counties  to  resist  unto  blood  this  effort  at 
defrauding  them  of  their  hard-won  constitutional  gain  was  to  be 
expected  under  the  circumstances.  For  we  see  "Ulster"  and  Sinn 
Fein  as  alike  rebels  against  democracy. 

c)  But  when  we  speak  of  the  war  as  a  democratic  crusade,  and 
as  an  effort  to  "make  the  world  safe  for  democracy,"  it  is  clear 
that  neither  of  the  foregoing  senses  can  be  intended.     What,  for 


548  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

example,  is  meant  by  the  view  that  Germany  must  be  "democra- 
tized"? None  of  us  cared  with  what  degree  of  servility  the  Ger- 
mans might  choose  to  prostrate  themselves  before  their  All  Highest, 
or  in  how  complex  a  system  of  h>^hened  prefixes  they  might  struggle 
to  express  the  fine  shades  of  their  noble  rank.  Still  less  can  we 
desire  to  intensify  that  subordination  of  the  individual  to  the  civic 
whole  of  which  Germany  beyond  doubt  has  had  too  much  rather 
than  too  Httle.  It  is  their  cast-iron  "patriotism"  which,  more  than 
any  other  cause  which  could  be  named,  made  possible  their  out- 
rage upon  the  world.  We  would  rather  instil,  if  we  could,  that 
wholesome  individual  rebelliousness  by  which  alone  a  collective 
purpose  of  brigandage  may  be  effectively  balked. 

What  we  do  mean,  then,  by  a  democratized  Germany  is  a  Ger- 
many in  which  pubHc  affairs  shall  no  longer  be  made  the  tool  of 
dynastic  intrigue  or  military  ambition.  For  this  purpose  we  would 
see  the  great  body  of  the  people  taking  government  into  their  own 
hands.  For  we  trust,  despite  much  appearance  to  the  contrary-, 
that  they  will  prove  far  better  than  the  oligarchs  who  have  misled 
them.  No  mere  depreciation  of  hereditary  rank  will  be  of  the 
slightest  use  until  there  is  an  active  and  intelHgent  participation 
in  politics,  especially  in  the  control  of  foreign  policy,  by  the  great 
mass  of  the  citizens. 

The  three  sorts  of  civic  quality  which  have  been  distinguished 
above,  and  to  which  the  same  name  has  somehow  been  applied, 
are  so  far  from  mutually  implying  one  another  that  each  of  them 
has  often  been  found,  and  is  still  often  found,  in  the  absence  of 
one  or  both  of  the  others.  A  man  may  be  vociferously  resentful 
about  caste  but  have  little  public  spirit  and  less  desire  to  take  a 
hand  in  public  business.  The  new  countries  have  known  many 
such  men,  hot  in  pursuit  of  a  private  fortune,  and  disdainfully 
avowing  their  disregard  of  "mere  politics."  A  few  generations 
ago  the  patriotism  of  merry  England  was  warm  in  the  breast  of 
multitudes  who  were  at  the  same  time  thoroughly  obsequious  to 
the  duke  and  the  baron,  quite  content  to  leave  every  public  matter 
to  such  wise  or  unwise  guidance.  And  today  the  militant  British 
"Liberal"  is  often  acquiescent  in  what  he  looks  upon  as  the 
empty  form  of  rank  and  very  determined  to  maintain  his  individual 


SOME  AMBIGUITIES  IN  "DEMOCRACY"  549 

freedom  against  majorities  not  less  than  against  kings,  yet  eager 
to  interfere  by  every  privilege  which  the  constitution  gives  him 
for  shaping  national  policy. 

IMoreover,  the  word  "democratic"  is  so  far  from  covering  all 
that  we  seek  in  a  sound  social  order  that  to  each  of  the  foregoing 
senses  a  special  danger  corresponds.  The  passion  for  equality  is 
a  constant  menace  to  legitimate  leadership  and  to  wholesome 
direction  by  the  expert.  The  Pilgrim  in  The  Ordeal  of  Richard 
Feverel  spoke  of  that  horrible  future  when  science  should  have 
produced  an  intellectual  aristocracy;  "for  what  despotism  is  so 
black  as  one  which  the  mind  cannot  challenge?"  And  yet,  if  we 
were  not  just  so  enthusiastic  in  our  belief  that  one  man's  opinion 
is  as  good  as  another's,  the  poor  dupe  of  the  patent  medicine 
advertisement  might  not  be  so  cruelly  robbed  and  tortured  in 
defiance  of  published  advice  against  quackery  by  our  medical 
associations.  It  has  been  well  said  that  a  plebiscite  a  hundred 
years  ago  would  have  forbidden  the  threshing-machine,  the  power 
loom,  the  spinning-jenny,  perhaps  even  the  steam  engine,  and 
that  in  England  at  an  earlier  date  a  wide  franchise  would  have 
prevented  the  reform  of  the  calendar,  preserved  the  penal  laws 
against  dissenters,  and  restored  the  House  of  Stuart.  We  may, 
indeed,  plume  ourselves  on  the  thought  that  since  then  the  school- 
master has  been  abroad.  But  there  must  always  be  a  great  gulf 
between  the  best  thought  and  the  average  thought  of  any  age. 
Nor  can  the  activity  of  all  the  schoolmasters  abolish  it,  any  more 
than  the  hind  legs  of  a  stag  can  be  trained  to  overtake  the  front 
ones.  "We  may  say  generally,"  wrote  the  pessimistic  Sir  Henry 
Maine,  "that  the  gradual  establishment  of  the  masses  in  power  is 
of  the  blackest  omen  for  all  legislation  founded  on  scientific  opinion, 
which  requires  tension  of  mind  to  understand  it  and  self-denial  to 
submit  to  it."  The  masses,  thank  God,  have  done  much  better 
than  Maine  expected.  But  we  know  what  he  meant.  The  present 
writer  has  seen,  for  example,  many  a  passionate  effort  to  diffuse 
belief  in  vaccination  among  those  who  still  cling  to  their  own 
ignorant  judgment  against  it.  Perhaps  they  prefer  a  democratic 
subjection  to  smallpox  rather  than  immunity  through  a  servile 
submissiveness  to  ohgarchic  science. 


5SO  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

The  danger  of  becoming  over-democratic  in  the  sense  of  coercing 
the  individual  will  under  a  tyrant  majority  has  been  displayed  to 
us  on  an  appalling  scale  by  the  case  of  the  German  professors. 
That  class  above  any  other  should  have  been  pledged  to  truth, 
and  not  merely  to  truth  when  popular  and  victorious,  but  to  truth 
when  overborne  by  clamor  and  threatened  by  authority.  But 
these  men  were  brought  up  in  an  atmosphere  where  truth  had  to 
play  into  the  hands  of  power.  They  lived  where  an  academic 
teacher  must  at  his  peril  say,  on  matters  of  state,  no  more  and  no 
less  than  was  prescribed  to  him,  where  he  must  pretend  an  enthu- 
siasm for  national  purposes  that  he  might  personally  hate,  where, 
in  short,  he  was  a  mere  literary  propagandist  for  court  and  public 
on  every  subject  which  touched  "patriotism."  His  academic 
future  depended  on  his  complaisance.  This  hiring  and  intimidating 
of  the  learned  class,  this  poisoning  of  the  stream  at  its  very  source, 
is  a  chief  count  in  our  indictment  against  the  enemies  of  civilization. 
There  they  stood,  those  wretched  German  Gelehrter,  issuing  pamphlet 
after  pamphlet  to  suit  the  mood  of  the  Wilhelmstrasse,  reinforcing 
the  infamous  unanimity  of  an  uninstructed  public  with  the  still  more 
infamous,  because  so  dishonest,  unanimity  of  the  erudite  and  the 
able.  Their  best  excuse  is  perhaps  that  of  the  trembling  senators 
of  Tiberius,  that  they  were  forced  to  "balance  terror  against  mutual 
shame."  The  thoughtless  folk  among  ourselves,  who  mock  at 
"academic  freedom,"  little  know  whose  language  they  have 
borrowed,  whence  comes  the  seed  they  are  trying  to  scatter,  and 
what  sort  of  fruit  it  has  been  proved  likely  to  bear. 

It  is  less  needful  to  point  out  the  risks  of  democracy  in  the 
third  sense  that  we  have  distinguished,  for  they  have  been  insisted 
on  with  tiresome  iteration  by  every  critic  from  Plato  down  to  Lecky 
and  Carlyle.  How  can  the  masses  legislate  for  themselves  when 
they  understand  their  own  good  so  poorly,  when  so  few  have  the 
leisure  that  is  needed  for  so  complex  a  study  as  government, 
when  the  crowd  is  such  a  helpless  prey  to  the  demagogue  and  the 
"machine,"  when  class  passions  are  so  readily  exasperated,  short 
views  are  so  much  easier  than  long  ones,  and  sacrifice  of  immediate 
personal  interest  for  remote  social  benefit  is  so  difficult  a  demand 
upon  the  average  man?    To  some  of  these  objections  democracy 


SOME  AMBIGUITIES  IN  "DEMOCRACY"  551 

has  given  such  an  answer  in  the  ordeal  of  the  war  that  we  need 
not  expect  them  to  present  themselves  again  with  quite  the  old 
arrogance.  We  have  proved  how  deep  was  the  truth  of  John 
Stuart  JMill's  judgment  fifty  years  ago:  "There  is  a  capacity  of 
exertion  and  self-denial  in  the  masses  of  mankind,  which  is  never 
known  but  on  the  rare  occasions  on  which  it  is  appealed  to  in  the 
name  of  some  great  idea  or  elevated  sentiment."  One  thing, 
however,  we  are  certain  to  hear  again,  that  the  vast  and  intricate 
field  of  foreign  affairs  cannot  be  "democratized"  but  that  decisions 
there  must  be  left  to  "those  who  know."  Some  men  to  whom 
this  last  phrase  can,  in  the  light  of  the  world-war,  be  applied  only 
with  ironic  facetiousness  do  not  hesitate  still  to  put  forward  the 
claims  of  that  secret  diplomacy  which  conducted  the  world  to 
disaster.  And,  although  they  belong  to  an  order  that  is  vanishing, 
they  will  be  made  to  vanish  all  the  sooner  if  the  real  democrat  will 
acknowledge  the  grain  of  truth  in  what  they  say,  and  will  prepare 
himself  with  a  democratic  scheme  that  can  turn  the  edge  of  their 
criticisms. 

The  prevailing  definition  of  democracy  is  "government  by  the 
will  of  the  people."  It  has  the  advantage  of  making  the  idea  of 
governme7it  central,  so  that  social  equality,  individual  submissive- 
ness,  and  a  common  interest  in  common  affairs  follow  by  way  of 
inference.  But  it  has  the  defect  of  including  poHties  which  can  be 
called  democratic  only  by  a  non-natural  use  of  the  word.  Every 
government  which  holds  its  place,  if  we  exclude  mere  military 
tyrannies,  may  be  said  to  rest  upon  the  will  of  the  people.  For 
any  nation  that  chooses  to  act  as  a  whole  can  at  its  pleasure  remove 
rulers  from  their  post.  If  it  refrains  from  doing  so,  this  must  be 
because  either  from  deliberate  preference  or  from  mere  dislike  of 
change  it  acquiesces  in  the  wielding  of  authority  by  those  in  power. 
When  Louis  Napoleon  made  himself  emperor  it  is  very  probable, 
indeed,  that  a  plebiscite  among  the  French  would  have  approved  the 
step.  Would  such  a  plebiscite  have  made  Napoleon's  government 
"democratic"  ?  It  was  one  of  the  quaint  statements  of  Bismarck 
that  the  throne  of  the  king  of  Prussia  was  broad  based  on  a  people's 
will.  And  it  is  by  no  means  certain  that  a  numerical  majority 
would  not  have  borne  Bismarck  out.     Mr.  Bertrand  Russell  has 


552  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

told  us  that  it  would  be  undemocratic  to  depose  the  Hohenzollerns 
at  the  end  of  the  war  unless  the  German  people  expressed  a  wish 
for  the  change!  The  use  of  words  in  this  way  is  enough  to  make 
one's  head  go  round.  Yet  it  is  certainly  true  that  whether  we 
think  of  rule  by  king  and  parliament,  or  of  rule  by  president  and 
congress,  or  of  rule  by  sultan  and  grand  vizier,  or  of  rule  by  a 
Manchu  dynasty,  it  is  the  public  which  by  its  overt  action  or  by 
its  tacit  approval  is  responsible  for  the  status  quo.  Every  people, 
as  the  old  proverb  says,  has  just  that  sort  of  government  which  it 
deserves.  But  surely  not  every  people  may  be  said  to  govern 
itself  democratically. 

Granted  that  the  public  is  the  ultimate  king-maker,  a  sharp 
difference  will  still  exist  between  that  state  in  which  the  decisive 
voice  of  the  pubhc  is  provided  with  an  acknowledged  organ  of 
expression  and  a  state  where  no  such  organ  is  available.  For  in 
the  one  case  popular  action  must  needs  be  revolutionary;  in  the 
other  it  is  constitutional.  Having  raised  to  power  a  certain  group 
of  rulers,  you  may  either  submit  without  criticism  to  whatever 
they  choose  to  do,  or  you  may  watch  them  at  every  important 
turn  to  make  sure  that  they  continue  to  execute  your  will.  And 
as  a  country  cannot  be  governed  by  continual  convulsions,  the  only 
method,  if  you  mean  to  be  masters  in  your  own  house,  is  to  estab- 
lish a  convenient  channel  through  which  pubhc  opinion  may  be 
constantly  brought  to  bear. 

Let  us  put  this  negatively.  There  are  two  ways  in  which, 
with  equal  deadhness,  the  principle  of  democracy  may  be  denied. 
It  may  be  repudiated  in  form,  or  it  may  be  nullified  in  practice. 
Formal  repudiation  has  been  exemplified  by  the  Germans.  They 
have  had  no  genuine  right  of  free  speech  and  free  assembly,  no 
unfettered  press,  no  power  of  removing  the  executive  from  office 
at  the  pubhc  will.  Thus,  however  true  it  may  be  that  the  people 
are  in  the  end  the  source  of  authority,  they  remain  at  crucial 
moments  without  real  influence.  But  one  can  also  suppose  a 
state  in  which  the  channels  of  popular  action  are  provided  but  are 
left  unused  in  practice.  Each  man  may  be  so  absorbed  in  his 
individual  fortunes  that  he  neglects  his  share  in  guiding  the  common 
affairs.  Everybody's  business  has  become  nobody's  business.  A 
handful  of  bureaucrats  is  allowed  to  work  its  will.     That  state 


SOME  AMBIGUITIES  IN  ''DEMOCRACY"  553 

has  the  form  of  democracy  but  lacks  its  power,  and  he  who  is  con- 
tent with  it  is  no  democrat  except  in  name. 

Thus  we  must  apply  a  twofold  test.  Mr.  Asquith  once  said  of 
the  British  House  of  Commons:  "There  is  not  a  wave,  there  is 
scarcely  even  a  ripple  of  public  opinion  which  is  not  reflected  in  our 
debates."  This  means  that  the  formal  test  is  there  answered  in  a 
high  degree,  and  no  doubt  a  similar  statement  could  be  made  of 
Congress.  But  in  each  case  there  must  he  a  genuine  public  opin- 
ion, not  the  opinion  of  a  few  newspapers  or  a  few  noisy  agitators, 
but  that  of  the  people  as  a  whole,  informing  itself  on  matters  of 
state,  and  exerting  itself  this  way  or  that  as  the  social  conscience 
may  direct.  No  Englishman  and  no  American  will  argue  that  either 
country  has  risen  in  this  respect  to  the  level  at  which  we  should  aim. 
Judged  so,  there  have  been  formal  democracies  which  we  should 
call  morally  autocratic  and  formal  autocracies  that  were  morally 
democratic.  We  need,  then,  a  national  self-consciousness,  not  in 
the  sense  of  a  Kiplingesque  jingoism,  but  in  the  sense  of  a  wide- 
spread resolve  on  the  part  of  the  common  man  to  know  what  his 
rulers  are  doing  in  foreign  policy,  and  to  know  it  before  it  has  been 
unalterably  done.  Our  advance  in  this  direction  has  been  notable, 
as  anyone  can  see  who  compares  the  thrashing  out  of  the  terms  of 
peace  today  in  the  public  forum  with  the  method  of  the  Holy 
AlUance  or  of  the  Congress  of  Berlin.  But  if  secret  diplomacy  is 
discredited,  and  if  the  public  is  to  play  an  altogether  new  part  in 
world-statesmanship,  how  much  is  needed  to  make  the  change 
effectual  and  to  secure  that  it  shall  be  a  benefit  ? 

It  is  safe  to  say  that  the  new  regime  will  demand  a  tremendous 
reform  of  public  education.  Citizenship  must  no  longer  be  a  side 
aspect  of  our  school  teaching,  a  thing  ''referred  to"  on  Fourths  of 
July  and  Empire  Days  to  the  accompaniment  of  a  flag,  the  recita- 
tion of  war  poetry  by  the  senior  class,  and  the  performance  of 
action  songs  by  the  primary  division  before  a  crowd  of  admiring 
parents.  Nor  must  the  teaching  of  citizenship  be  a  mere  systematic 
drilling  in  submissiveness  to  the  powers  that  be.  What  we  want 
is  to  make  our  children  more  fit  than  we  have  been,  not  simply  to 
execute  public  policies  but  to  determine  them.  How  lamentable  it 
is  that  such  prolonged  propaganda  should  have  been  needed  in  the 
United  States,  in  Canada,  in  Great  Britain,  to  make  our  people 


554  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

know  what  militarism  is,  what  German  imperialism  is,  what 
rights  are  safeguarded  in  the  public  law  of  nations,  why  peace  at 
any  price  is  an  ignoble  ideal,  where  the  limits  must  be  set  which 
mark  off  legitimate  national  spirit  from  inhuman  national  aggres- 
siveness !  We  ought  not  to  have  required  so  many  tons  of  pamphlets 
and  so  many  months  of  popular  lecturing  before  these  elements  of 
citizenship  were  adequately  realized.  If  democracy  is  to  be  efifect- 
ive  in  ruling  the  world  such  delay  must  never  be  imposed  upon 
our  action  again.  It  may  be  said  that  the  school  cannot  impart 
such  compHcated  ideas  to  an  immature  mind.  It  would  be  nearer 
the  truth  to  say  that  the  mind  of  an  intelligent  boy  or  girl  has  just 
the  elasticity  and  the  receptiveness  that  are  absent  in  the  average 
adult.  Try  to  explain  the  heinousness  of  selling  votes  before  the 
senior  class  in  a  public  school,  and  you  will  meet  with  less  dishonest 
casuistry  than  would  be  put  forward  by  these  children's  parents. 
It  is  not  less  absurd  to  say  that  international  morals  cannot  be 
taught  to  the  young  because  of  the  complex  thinking  it  involves 
than  to  suggest  that  Sunday  schools  must  be  a  failure  because  the 
Athanasian  Creed  is  so  very  metaphysical.  We  should  of  course 
have  to  change  many  things:  qualification  of  teachers,  type  of 
curriculum,  character  of  textbooks,  and  much  more.  But  this  is 
part  of  the  burden  and  the  challenge  of  a  new  time. 

Again,  the  democratic  citizen  of  the  future  must  be  educated 
not  only  for  civic  self-expression  but  for  civic  self-control.  It 
is  not  more  important  that  he  should  learn  to  fulfil  the  func- 
tions which  belong  to  him  than  that  he  should  learn  to  recognize 
what  functions  do  7tot  belong  to  him.  The  war  has  brought 
home  to  us  in  its  own  brutal  fashion  a  new  regard  for  science. 
Not  very  long  ago  the  scientific  expert  was  having  an  uphill 
fight  for  his  due  place  in  our  British  and  American  communities. 
And  until  his  due  place  is  conceded  we  must  expect  that  the 
expert  will  be  much  rarer  than  he  might  be  and  should  be.  Take, 
for  example,  an  election  campaign  which  involves  some  serious 
issue  regarding  public  health.  Does  the  party  agent  on  one 
side  feel  very  greatly  strengthened,  or  the  party  agent  on  the 
other  very  much  discouraged,  by  an  "overwhelming"  manifesto 
of  the  medical  profession?  Such  a  document  can,  as  a  rule,  be 
tremendously  counteracted  by  artful  propaganda,  by  appeals  to 


SOME  AMBIGUITIES  IN  "DEMOCRACY"  555 

prejudice,  by  insinuation  of  personal  designs  on  the  part  of  the 
doctors,  by  a  skilful  use  of  such  terms  of  reproach  as  "theorist" 
and  "faddist."  So  far  the  very  mildest  eugenic  proposals  have 
made  little  headway.  Most  of  us  know  cities  in  which  a  suggested 
law  of  compulsory  vaccination  would  meet  with  a  perfect  tornado 
of  resentment  at  the  polls.  We  have  allowed  a  sort  of  myth  to 
grow  up  that  the  "practical"  man  must  keep  a  watch  upon  the 
"dreamer,"  and  that  business  experience,  native  common  sense, 
are  the  great  sources  of  wise  legislation.  But  the  myth  has  been 
pricked  by  the  war.  We  have  learned  how  unmanageable  by 
mere  common  sense  are  the  explosives  that  are  made  in  a  laboratory, 
the  new  mechanical  designs  of  the  aerial  and  marine  engineer,  nay 
even  the  expansive  ideas  conceived  by  men  of  literature  and  set 
afloat  upon  the  world  through  the  press.  The  power  of  dollars, 
of  business  aptitude,  of  "great  executive  ability,"  has  been  thrust 
into  the  background  by  the  power  of  thought.  If  this  has  been 
the  case  even  amid  that  clash  of  arms  by  which  the  voice  of  reason 
is  supposed  to  be  overborne,  how  much  more  should  it  be  so  when 
the  world  has  to  be  reorganized  not  for  war  but  for  peace  ? 

What  we  must  set  before  ourselves  then  is  the  task  of  making 
our  elective  system  far  more  productive  than  it  has  ever  yet  been 
of  rulers  who  shall  deserve  our  trust  not  merely  by  their  upright- 
ness but  by  their  insight.  The  Herculean  work  before  us  must  not 
be  laid  upon  the  very  un-Herculean  shoulders  of  such  men  as  we 
have  had.  Thinking  on  a  vast  and  world-transforming  scale  has 
to  be  done,  and  we  have  to  choose  those  who  will  do  a  great  deal 
of  it  for  us.  For,  however  much  we  may  speak  of  mandates  and 
plebiscites  and  referendums,  we  know  that  the  more  complex  our 
affairs  become  the  greater  must  be  the  responsibility  for  decisions 
that  we  cast  upon  our  parliamentary  representatives.  The  ver- 
dict at  the  polls  is  on  an  issue  of  principle;  the  details,  often  of 
immense  difficulty  and  importance,  must  be  settled  by  our  dele- 
gates, and  it  is  the  quite  sufficiently  arduous  task  of  the  common 
voter  to  determine  who  those  delegates  shall  be. 

It  is  not  by  making  democracy  prevail  in  the  sense  of  enthroning 
average  opinion;  it  is  rather  by  securing  for  average  opinion  the 
best  possible  enlightenment  from  the  brain  and  will  of  the  most 
competent,  that  the  next  great  step  forward  shall  have  been  taken. 


556  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

Surely,  then,  one  of  the  measures  most  clearly  indicated  for  the 
improvement  of  our  education  is  an  organized  advance  in  the  sub- 
ject of  "political  science"  at  our  universities  and  colleges.  This 
very  term  still  sounds  a  little  odd  to  the  man  in  the  street,  who  has 
been  accustomed  to  think  of  politics  and  science  in  quite  different 
moods  of  mind.  But  if  our  universities  are  to  be  a  real  center 
from  which  the  light  of  knowledge  will  shine  abroad,  can  we  afford 
to  neglect  as  we  have  done  so  immensely  important  a  field  as  the 
problems  of  government  ?  Will  anyone  contend  that  our  seats  of 
learning  have  contributed  even  a  fraction  of  the  help  that  might 
have  been  expected  of  them  to  make  the  common  voter  more 
intelligent  in  the  use  of  the  franchise  ?  And  can  we  conceive  any 
other  province  which  calls  for  "university  extension"  work  more 
urgently  ?  Yet  a  word  must  here  be  said  about  the  danger  which 
seems  to  dog  such  academic  teaching  in  "poHtics."  No  maledic- 
tion can  be  adequate  upon  those  who  seem  to  advise  that  we 
should  herein  take  our  model  from  Germany.  What  we  seek  to 
promote  is  political  science.  The  first  requisite  of  science  is  free- 
dom, and  the  first  essential  in  its  professors  is  fearless  independence  of 
popular  prejudice.  To  say  this  is  by  no  means  to  question  the  need 
at  the  most  extraordinary  crisis  of  the  Great  War  for  exceptional 
restraint  by  the  state  on  the  expression  of  opinions  dangerous  to 
public  safety.  But  the  need  and  legitimacy  of  restraint  at  all  times 
upon  social  teaching  that  is  uncongenial  to  the  teacher's  miheu 
are  being  shamelessly  proclaimed.  In  one  college  after  another 
social  science  has  thus  been  burlesqued.  No  scientific  man  can  too 
strongly  insist  that  the  principle  of  unfettered  investigation  and 
uncensored  publication  shall  at  the  earliest  safe  moment  be  restored. 
It  touches  the  very  life  of  a  progressive  democracy. 

Those  who  would  limit  the  teaching  in  government  or  in  eco- 
nomics by  the  tone  of  prevalent  opinion  are  the  lineal  descendants 
of  those  who  interdicted  Galileo  from  saying  what  he  thought  about 
the  stars.  Those  who  think  that  a  heretical  sociologist  should 
"seek  the  endowment  of  his  chair  from  those  who  agree  with  hun" 
would  have  bidden  Copernicus  expect  no  further  countenance  until 
he  loyally  and  democratically  adhered  to  the  view  that  the  sun 
goes  round  the  earth.     It  is  just  at  this  point  that  the  strain  upon 


SOME  AMBIGUITIES  IN  "DEMOCRACY''  557 

popular  institutions  has  become  most  intense,  and  that  those  who 
understand  the  vital  need  for  protecting  unpopular  sincerity  are 
separating  themselves  from  the  charlatans  who  flatter  the  unin- 
structed  and  toot  for  profit  among  the  vulgar.  President  Wilson's 
ringing  denunciation  of  the  mob  violence  that  masquerades  as 
patriotism  should  be  taken  to  heart  by  every  college  trustee  who 
is  in  danger  of  mistaking  loyalty  to  his  own  ignorances  for  loyalty 
to  the  state,  and  by  every  college  head  who  cannot  distinguish 
between  enthusiasm  for  the  American  flag  and  enthusiasm  for 
increased  salary  from  a  board  of  regents.  The  manifold  questions 
about  property,  about  labor,  about  trusts,  about  trade,  about 
national  equipment,  about  eugenics,  which  must  be  settled  in  the 
coming  time  of  peace,  cannot  be  dealt  with  in  that  poisoned  atmos- 
phere of  restraint  with  which  not  a  few  who  should  know  better 
would  seek  to  surround  us.  They  fear,  forsooth,  that  the  simple 
may  be  misled,  and  the  national  will  may  be  impeded!  Theories 
that  are  false  and  tendencies  that  are  retrograde  will  be  exposed  in 
due  time  in  the  only  way  in  which  they  can  ever  be  exposed  with 
effect,  not  by  persecution,  but  by  frank  and  tolerant  criticism.  To 
bear  such  criticism  when  it  is  distasteful  is  just  what  democracy  must 
learn.  And  to  those  who  would  dole  out "  truth  "  under  precautions 
we  must  reply  that  truth  has  so  far  proved  capable  of  looking  after 
itself  with  Httle  help  or  profit  from  their  trembling  solicitudes. 

If  any  ingenious  devotee  of  words  can  prove  that  the  educa- 
tional requirements  I  have  tried  to  indicate  for  the  democracy  of 
the  future  are  all  deducible  from  the  meaning  of  that  very  elusive 
word  itself,  by  all  means  let  him  do  so.  Others  will  think  it  prefer- 
able to  attempt  no  such  linguistic  manipulations,  but  to  speak 
rather  of  those  checks  and  balances  by  which  democracy  is  made 
safe.  One  thing  in  any  case  is  clear,  that  he  is  no  friend  but  rather 
an  enemy  of  the  democratic  system  who  would  see  it  estabHshed 
without  those  conditions  under  which  alone  it  can  yield  its  best. 
Nothing  is  easier  than  to  demand  it  in  those  shrill  tones  of  com- 
pliment to  "the  people"  which  the  people  love  to  hear.  But  the 
democrat  who,  as  Lord  Morley  has  well  said,  prefers  using  his 
mind  to  merely  exercising  his  tongue  on  the  people's  behalf  is 
their  true  servant  for  the  future. 


PUBLIC  SERVICE  THROUGH  CHAJVIBERS  OF  COMMERCE 


W.  J.  DONALD 

New  York  City 


There  are  nearly  a  thousand  American  cities  with  a  population 
of  over  eight  thousand.  Each  of  these  cities  has  a  problem  or  a 
group  of  problems  sufficient  to  warrant  the  present  existence  of  at 
least  one  community  organization.  Many  cities  have  been  growing 
so  rapidly  that  their  range  of  problems  covers  everything  from 
city  planning  and  housing  to  a  new  form  of  city  government,  a 
new  railroad  freight  and  passenger  terminal,  a  new  franchise  for 
a  street  railway  or  the  financing  of  a  new  hotel.  Occasionally — 
but  rarely — one  finds  a  city  that  is  so  dead  that  it  has  no  housing 
problem  or  any  other  problem  except  deadness. 

This  means  that  there  are  at  least  one  thousand  cities  in  which 
there  is  a  chamber  of  commerce  or  other  civic  organization  which 
someone  of  ample  training  and  high  purpose  may  serve  as 
community  leader.' 

THE  CHALLENGE  OF  A  PROGRAM  OF  WORK 

Being  fully  aware  that  many  socially  minded  civic  and  social 
workers  are  inclined  to  look  with  disdain  on  the  chamber  of  com- 
merce and  to  doubt  the  possibility  of  constructive  community 
service  through  the  chamber  of  commerce,  I  venture  to  present 
the  program  of  work  of  the  Bridge  ton.  New  Jersey,  chamber  of 
commerce  as  a  sample.  The  statement  of  this  program  of  work, 
as  it  appears  in  a  report  of  one  of  the  field  secretaries  of  the  American 
City  Bureau,  is  printed  herewith  in  full  as  follows: 

PROGRAM  OF  WORK 

INTRODUCTION 

The  following  is  the  result  of  a  thorough  survey  of  the  membership  of 
the  Bridgeton  Chamber  of  Commerce,  as  obtained  through  a  series  of  group 

'  For  an  extended  discussion  of  chamber  of  commerce  ideals  and  methods  see 
Community  Leadership — The  New  Profession,  by  Lucius  E.  Wilson,  vice-president  of 
American  City  Bureau,  Civic  Press,  New  York,  1919. 

558 


PUBLIC  SERVICE  THROUGH  CHAMBERS  OF  COMMERCE    559 

meetings.  They  are  an  expression  of  the  most  urgent  and  obvious  needs  of 
the  community  at  the  present  time.  In  the  natural  course  of  events,  other 
projects  will  demand  the  consideration  and  decisive  action  of  the  Chamber. 
Accomplishment  of  the  projects  included  in  these  programs  is  dependent 
upon  intelligent  leadership  on  the  part  of  officers  and  directors  and  enthusiastic 
co-operation  on  the  part  of  the  membership.  The  programs  present  a  broad 
and  comprehensive  field  for  organized  comxnunity  endeavor,  giving  promise 
of  actual  accomplishment  because  derived  from  the  united  thought  of  the 
membership. 

MAJOR  PROGRAM  OF  WORK 

A  general  demand  already  exists  for  the  accomplishment  of  subjects 
placed  under  this  heading.  The  Chamber  of  Commerce  is,  therefore,  in  a 
position  to  find  immediate  and  wide  support  in  its  activities  directed  along 
these  lines. 

1 .  Streets. — Co-operate  with  City  Council  to  secure  improvement  of  streets 
and  extension  of  the  present  pavement  system. 

2.  Education. — ^\Vork  for  an  improved  public-school  system,  advocating 
the  erection  of  a  new  high  school  and  endeavoring  to  raise  local  educational 
standards. 

3.  Good  roads. — Inaugurate  movement  to  improve  all  highways  leading 
into  Bridgeton  and  endeavor  to  obtain  hard  surface  road  for  trucking  produce 
to  big  marketing  centers. 

4.  Health. — Advocate  the  estabUshment  of  a  garbage  collection  and  disposal 
system,  extension  of  the  sewerage  system  and  adequate  enforcement  of  the 
sanitation  laws. 

5.  Transportation. — Take  steps  to  secure  improvement  of  local  train  and 
trolley  service. 

6.  Housing. — Encourage  the  building  of  homes  as  a  solution  of  the  housing 
situation. 

7.  Comfort  station.— Tiovide  public  restroom  and  comfort  station  for  the 
convenience  of  out-of-town  people  who  make  Bridgeton  their  trading  center. 

8.  Industrial  development.— Develop  Bridgeton  industrially  by  fostering 
the  industries  already  located  here  and  endeavoring  to  secure  new  ones. 

9.  Publicity.— Advertise  the  advantages  of  Bridgeton  as  a  good  place  in 
which  to  live  and  work. 

10.  Civic  co-operation. — Bring  the  general  public  to  an  understanding  and 
appreciation  of  the  aims  and  purposes  of  the  Chamber  of  Conunerce  in  an 
effort  to  unite  the  entire  citizenship  into  an  effective  force  for  promoting  the 
best  interests  of  Bridgeton. 

11.  Street  lighting. — Urge  City  Council  to  improve  the  present  street 
lighting  system. 

12.  Community  building. — Undertake  campaign  to  secure  erection  of  a 
community  building  as  a  memorial  to  Bridgeton's  ex-service  men. 


560  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

FORUM  AND  DISCUSSIONAL  PROGRAM 

Certain  projects  will  require  discussion  and  the  winnings  of  a  larger  interest 
and  support  before  they  are  undertaken,  if  efforts  are  to  be  successful. 

A  single  meeting  of  the  Membership  Forum  may  indicate  a  degree  of 
interest  in  a  topic  that  will  justify  its  immediate  transference  to  the  Major 
Program  by  the  Board  of  Directors,  and  the  appointment  of  a  committee  to 
begin  work. 

1.  Traffic  regulations. — Consider  ways  and  means  for  the  parking  of 
automobiles  and  the  elimination  of  traffic  congestion. 

2.  Agricultural  development. — Study  the  need  of  and  develop  plans  for  the 
assistance  of  farmers  in  the  marketing  of  their  products. 

3.  Recreation. — Focus  public  attention  upon  the  necessity  for  adequately 
equipped  and  properly  supervised  parks,  plaj^grounds,  dance  halls,  theaters, 
and  recreational  centers  where  Bridgeton's  young  people  can  enjoy  themselves 
under  wholesome  social  surroundings. 

4.  Fire  prevention. — ^Stimulate  public  interest  in  the  care  of  property  so  as 
to  eliminate  the  dangers  of  fire. 

5.  City  beautification. — Promote  a  sense  of  pride  in  the  appearance  of  the 
city,  encouraging  general  participation  in  all  "clean-up  movements,"  and 
urging  rigid  enforcement  of  existing  ordinances. 

6.  Taxation. — Arrange  for  the  presentation  of  arguments  favorable  to  a 
readjustment  of  taxable  valuation  and  rate  with  a  view  to  an  increase  in  city 
and  county  income  which  will  take  care  of  needed  improvements. 

7.  City  planning. — Advance  as  a  subject  for  early  discussion  a  feasible  plan 
which  will  provide  for  the  future  growth  and  development  of  the  city. 

8.  Retail  trade. — Awaken  interest  among  merchants  in  a  plan  to  improve 
store  service,  thereby  strengthening  the  position  of  the  city  as  a  mercantile 
trading  center. 

SUPPLEMENTARY  PROGRAM  OF  ACTIVITIES 

The  following  subjects  were  presented,  but  do  not  appear  to  have  sufficient 
support  to  warrant  their  being  placed  in  the  Major  or  Forum  Programs. 
They  may  be  introduced  into  the  activities  of  the  organization  as  public 
attention  is  attracted  to  them  and  as  there  is  opportunity  to  carry  them  out. 

Bring  before  the  public  the  necessity  for  more  adequate  accommodations 
for  visitors. 

Unite  with  the  other  Chambers  of  Commerce  in  this  district  to  secure  a 
satisfactory  proportion  of  state  expenditures  in  South  Jersey. 

3.  Urge  City  Council  to  enact  an  ordinance  providing  for  milk  inspection. 

4.  Co-operate  with  local  ministers  to  increase  interest  in  church  activities. 

5.  Suggest  to  the  banks  the  advisability  of  remaining  open  one  evening  a 
week  instead  of  Saturday  afternoon. 

6.  Establish  a  public  forum  for  the  discussion  of  important  municipal 
questions. 


PUBLIC  SERVICE  THROUGH  CHAMBERS  OF  COMMERCE    561 

7.  Educate  the  people  of  the  city  to  appreciate  and  support  the  Bridgeton 
Hospital. 

8.  Develop  a  sentiment  favorable  to  the  proper  marking  of  streets  and 
renumbering  of  houses. 

9.  Advocate  erection  of  a  municipal  abattoir. 

10.  Discuss  the  possibilities  of  an  improved  form  of  city  government. 

11.  Consider  advisability  of  conducting  a  campaign  to  secure  a  Y.M.C.A. 

INTERRELATION  OF  CIVICS  AND  COMMERCE 

It  has  been  a  common  sport  for  socially  trained  "civic"  workers 
to  assume  a  superior  and  self-righteous  attitude  toward  the  chamber 
of  commerce  and  the  chamber  of  commerce  secretary.  This  pose 
is  bred  of  a  false  philosophy  of  life  which  assumes  that  social  and 
economic  points  of  view  are  separate  and  distinct,  and  that, 
therefore,  civics  and  commerce  should  be  kept  in  thought-tight 
compartments. 

Actual  experience  of  the  chamber  of  commerce  secretary  has 
served  to  demonstrate  the  oneness  of  the  community  problem. 
In  secretarial  literature  it  finds  its  expression  in  more  than  one 
paper  on  "The  Interrelation  of  Civics  and  Commerce."  Thus 
one  finds  that  health  and  education,  city  planning  and  zoning, 
municipal  administration,  language  and  religion,  politics  and  race, 
are  intertwined  with  the  business  of  making  a  living.  A  few 
illustrations  quoted  from  a  Manual  on  City  Planning  Procedure'- 
will  serve  to  illustrate  more  in  detail: 

Street  traffic. — Is  retail  trade  handicapped  by  the  inadequacy  of  parking 
areas  for  automobiles,  and  by  the  consequent  parking  in  front  of  store  windows 
furnished  for  display  ?  Does  the  trade  avoid  congested  streets,  and  can 
shoppers  approach  store  fronts  by  automobiles  ?  Is  the  time  of  business  men 
and  workmen  wasted  by  traffic  delays  caused  by  a  congestion  of  street  cars, 
horse-drawn  vehicles,  motor  busses,  and  automobiles  ?  Must  trucks  take 
"the  long  way  around"  in  dehvering  industrial  products  or  merchandise  to 
railroad  terminals  ?  One  could  elaborate  on  the  economic  significance  of  the 
street  traffic  problem  at  length. 

Zoning. — Real  estate  men  everywhere  are  anxious  for  zoning,  in  the 
interests  of  their  property  or  the  property  of  their  cHents.     Does  it  mean 

'  Manual  on  City  Planning  Procedure,  by  W.  J.  Donald,  American  City  Bureau, 
1920. 


562  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

anything  to  mortgage  companies  that  homes  are  protected  from  the  encroach- 
ment of  stores,  from  the  shadows  of  apartments,  and  smoke  and  fumes  of 
industry  ?  Does  the  dry  goods  merchant  want  proximity  to  a  garage  or  does 
the  manufacturer  of  sUks  seek  a  chemical  plant  as  his  neighbor?  Retail 
business  men  succeed  best  where  business  men  "most  do  congregate."  The 
retail  "comer  grocery"  was  ever  a  precarious  financial  adventure. 

Grade  crossings. — Consider  the  time  lost  to  business  by  delays  caused  by 
grade  crossings.  Street  cars,  automobiles,  pedestrians,  trucks  and  delivery 
wagons  are  kept  standing,  and  workmen  and  clerks  are  late  for  work.  Life 
that  can  be  valued  only  inadequately  in  money  terms  is  destroyed  by  grade 
crossing  accidents.  Retail  business  districts  are  damaged  and  residential 
sections  are  blighted,  until  the  obstruction  is  removed. 

The  principle  suggested  by  these  illustrations  is  one  which  the 
business  man  understands  more  or  less  in  its  concrete  applications. 
It  is  a  principle  so  well  understood  by  a  large  percentage  of  chamber 
of  commerce  secretaries  that  their  years  are  being  devoted  to 
teaching  it  to  business  men  and  to  applying  it  in  the  solution  of 
practical  problems.  Indeed  the  chamber  of  commerce  secretary 
who  thinks  only  in  terms  of  one  of  the  special  social  sciences  will 
fail  to  solve  the  problems  of  the  community,  and  sooner  or  later 
will  destroy  the  chamber  of  commerce  by  undermining  the  only 
philosophy  on  which  it  can  live.  This  statement  is  not  only 
theory — it  is  also  tried  and  proven  practice. 

THE  CHAMBER  OF  COMMERCE  SECRETARY 

To  understand  the  nature  and  scope  of  the  program  of  work  of  a 
chamber  of  commerce  is  a  challenge  to  the  man  who  would  serve 
the  public.  The  opportunity  of  the  chamber  of  commerce  secretary 
invites  men  of  the  very  best  of  training  in  the  social  sciences 
together  with  executive  ability.  One's  knowledge  of  the  sources 
of  information  is  likely  to  be  taxed  to  the  utmost  in  the  course  of  a 
week's  work. 

What  level  the  profession  has  reached  is  indicated  by  a  "Code 
of  Ethics"  prepared  by  a  committee  of  experienced  secretaries  and 
adopted  by  the  Students  Association  at  the  American  City  Bureau 
School  for  Chamber  of  Commerce  Secretaries  held  at  Madison, 
Wisconsin,  in  August  of  1920.  The  "code,"  which  might  well  be 
emulated  by  other  professions,  is  as  follows: 


PUBLIC  SERVICE  THROUGH  CHAMBERS  OF  COMMERCE    563 
COMMUNITY  LEADERSHIP  IS  A  PROFESSION 

I  BELIEVE 

That  it  offers  an  exceptional  opportunity  for  constructive  and  substantial 
community  service. 

That  as  a  member  of  this  profession  I  should  strive  to  improve  my  knowl- 
edge, widen  my  mental  and  spiritual  horizon,  and  arrive  at  an  imderstanding 
of  the  forces  which  move  men  to  united  action  for  the  public  weal. 

That  I  should  be  at  all  times  sincere,  considerate,  unprejudiced  and  fearless. 

That  my  morals  should  be  above  reproach. 

That  I  should  apply  myself  to  my  work  with  a  diligence  and  industry 
consistent  with  my  physical  and  social  eflficiency. 

That  I  should  scrupulously  administer  the  finances  and  affairs  of  my 
office  in  accordance  with  the  best  business  practice. 

That  I  should  be  honest  and  accurate  in  the  dissemination  of  information 
regarding  the  community  which  I  represent. 

That  I  should  hold  in  strictest  confidence  all  information  given  in  the  same 
spirit. 

That  I  should  take  no  advantage  for  personal  gain  of  private  information 
received  through  the  activities  of  the  organization  which  I  serve. 

That  a  greater  field  for  service  rather  than  a  higher  salary  should  be  the 
actuating  motive  in  any  future  advancement  in  my  profession. 

That  I  should  make  no  tender  of  my  services  to  another  community  unless 
certain  that  the  position  desired  is  to  be  vacated. 

That  I  should  not  accept  a  salary  greater  than  commercial  organization 
experience  shows  my  organization  is  justified  in  paying. 

That  I  should  accept  no  remuneration  for  my  services  as  a  commercial 
organization  executive  apart  from  the  regular  salary  for  the  position,  except 
with  the  full  approval  of  the  Board  of  Directors. 

That  I  should  refrain  from  attempting  to  increase  my  salary  by  playing 
one  organization  against  another. 

That  to  make  a  change  of  position  after  only  a  few  months  of  service  or 
while  in  the  midst  of  important  incompleted  activities  is  wrong  in  principle 
and  detrimental  to  the  profession. 

That  the  ethics  of  my  profession  are  best  served  by  giving  credit  for 
accomplishments  to  the  organization,  rather  than  to  the  secretary. 

That  I  should  have  the  courage  to  admit  my  mistakes  and  thereon  build 
for  future  success. 

That  I  should  so  conduct  myself  and  the  affairs  of  my  organization  that 
others  in  the  profession  may  find  it  wise  and  profitable  to  follow  my  example. 

That  I  should  be  willing  at  all  times,  when  requested,  to  assist  my  fellow 
secretaries  in  the  solution  of  their  problems  and  in  securing  a  better  under- 
standing of  the  principles  of  the  profession. 


564  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

That  my  acceptance  of  a  position  as  secretary  should  be  founded  upon 
implicit  faith  in  my  community,  in  my  organization,  in  my  profession  and  in 
myself. 

That  above  all  I  should  be  loyal  to  my  community  and  to  my  organization. 

That  I  should  exemplify  the  principles  of  unselfish  community  idealism 
and  urge  the  responsibility  and  privilege  of  community  service. 

THE  OPPORTUNITY 

There  is  a  constantly  growing  demand  for  well-trained  men 
for  chamber  of  commerce  secretaryships.  Moreover,  standards  of 
quality  are  constantly  and  rapidly  rising. 

The  problems  which  the  secretary  must  help  to  solve  call  for 
adequate  training,  executive  ability,  the  impulse  for  public  service, 
and  a  philosophy  of  society  which  sees  the  community  problem  as 
fundamentally  one  rather  than  diverse. 


the  aftermath  of  the  black  death  and  the 
after:math  of  the  great  war 


JAMES  WESTFALL  THOMPSON 
University  of  Chicago 


Ever  since  the  Great  War  terminated  and  the  world  lapsed 
into  the  condition — physical,  moral,  economic,  social — in  which  it 
now  finds  itself,  historians  and  students  of  social  pathology  have 
been  searching  if  possibly  they  might  discover  a  precedent  in  the 
past  for  the  present  order  (or  rather  disorder)  of  things.  The 
years  immediately  following  the  close  of  the  Napoleonic  Wars  have 
been  the  favorite  epoch  for  examination.  But  the  conditions  of 
the  period  after  Waterloo  have  been  found  to  bear  little  resemblance 
to  conditions  today.  The  differences  in  degree  between  things 
as  they  were  then  and  things  as  they  now  are  is  so  great  that 
analogies  fail.  The  old  maxims,  "We  understand  the  present 
by  the  past,"  and  "History  is  philosophy  teaching  by  example," 
are  broken  shibboleths.  There  seems  to  have  been  nothing  in  the 
past  comparable  or  applicable  to  the  present. 

And  yet,  though  it  is  true  that  history  never  repeats  itself,  there 
is  one  epoch  of  the  past  the  study  of  which  casts  remarkable  light 
upon  things  as  they  are  today;  whose  conditions  afford  phenomenal 
parallels  in  many  particulars  to  present  conditions;  which  furnishes 
not  merely  analogies  but  real  identities  with  existing  economic, 
social,  and  moral  circumstances.  That  period  is  the  years  immedi- 
ately succeeding  the  Great  Plague  or  the  Black  Death  of  1348-49 
in  Europe.  The  turmoil  of  the  world  today  serves  to  visualize 
for  us  what  the  state  of  Europe  was  in  the  middle  of  the  fourteenth 
century  far  more  distinctly  than  ever  was  perceived  before.  It  is 
surprising  to  see  how  similar  are  the  complaints  then  and  now: 
economic  chaos,  social  unrest,  high  prices,  profiteering,  depravation 
of  morals,  lack  of  production,  industrial  indolence,  frenetic  gaiety, 
wild  expenditure,  luxury,  debauchery,  social  and  religious  hysteria, 
greed,  avarice,  maladministration,  decay  of  manners. 

565 


566  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

Let  us  consider  the  first  and  most  immediate  effect — the  loss 
of  man-power  owing  to  the  great  mortality.  While  it  is  true  that 
the  population  of  Europe  is  much  greater  now  than  in  the  fourteenth 
century,  and  the  mortality  far  higher  then  than  in  the  past  five 
years,  nevertheless,  as  everyone  knows,  the  working  efficiency  of 
Europe  has  been  seriously  reduced  owing  to  the  death  of  large 
numbers  of  men  in  battle  or  of  disease,  to  which  must  be  added 
some  millions  of  the  civilian  population  from  starvation,  privation, 
and  disease.  And  many  of  those  who  survive  are  shaken  in  body 
or  in  mind.  The  nerves  of  these  people  are  so  shattered  that  it 
will  be  a  long  time  before  they  can  go  back  to  work;  many  of  them 
never  will.  The  same  was  true  of  the  people  of  Europe  in  1349^ 
when  the  Black  Death  had  passed.  The  psycho-physical  shock 
to  them  had  been  so  great  that  restoration  of  their  former  vitality 
and  initiative  was  impossible,  or  very  slow. 

The  economic  effect  of  the  Black  Death  also  was  not  unsimilar 
to  the  effect  of  the  Great  War,  though  the  immediate  results  of 
the  plague  were  very  different.  The  moment  the  war  began 
prices  soared.  This  was  not  so  in  1349.  The  immediate  effect 
of  the  Black  Death  was  to  lower  prices  and  to  glut  the  market  with 
commodities.  The  reason  is  not  far  to  seek.  Every  civilized 
society  possesses  a  certain  accumulated  surplus  of  goods  or  produce, 
enough  to  last  it  for  some  months  at  least,  even  if  production  cease. 
Now  the  mortality  due  to  the  Black  Death  was  very  high,  at  least 
35  per  cent  of  the  population.  The  consequence  was  that  when 
the  plague  had  spent  its  force  the  surviving  population  found  itself 
in  possession  of  these  accumulated  stores,  produce,  goods,  in 
addition  to  movable  and  real  property  which  had  once  belonged  to 
those  now  dead. 

Men  woke  up  to  find  themselves  rich  who  had  formerly  been 
poor,  inasmuch  as  they  were  the  only  surviving  heirs.  Land, 
houses,  furniture,  goods,  farm  products,  cattle,  horses,  sheep,  were 
without  owners,  and  most  of  it  was  immediately  appropriated  by 
the  survivors.  Everything  movable  or  which  could  be  driven 
away  on  four  feet  was  seized;  even  landed  property  was  occupied 
since  there  was  no  one  to  protest  and  the  very  courts  of  law  were 
stopped.     "There   were    small   prices   for   everything,"    records 


AFTERMATH  OF  BLACK  DEATH  AND  GREAT  WAR       567 

Henry  Knighton,  the  medieval  chronicler.  "A  man  could  have  a 
horse,  which  before  was  worth  40s.  for  65.  Sd.;  a  fat  ox  for  45.; 
a  cow  for  i2d.;  a  heifer  for  2d. ;  a  big  pig  for  $d. ;  a  fat  wether  for  4d. ; 
a  sheep  for  36?.;  a  lamb  for  2d.;  a  stone  of  wool  for  gd.  Sheep 
and  cattle  went  wandering  over  fields  and  through  crops,  and  there 
was  no  one  to  go  and  drive  or  gather  them. " 

The  direct  result  of  all  this  suddenly  acquired  wealth  was  a 
wild  orgy  of  expenditure  and  debauchery  on  the  part  of  many. 
Furs,  silks,  tapestries,  rich  furniture,  expensive  food,  jewels,  plate, 
fell  within  the  purchasing  power  of  the  poor.  Men  spent  lavishly, 
luxuriously,  insanely.  Poor  workmen  and  poorer  cotters,  living  in 
wretched  hovels,  who  formerly,  like  Margery  Daw,  had  slept  on 
straw,  now  lolled  on  beds  of  down  and  ate  from  plate  that  once  had 
decorated  the  sideboards  of  nobles.  Often,  too,  they  removed  from 
their  ancient  quarters  into  the  vacant  houses.  The  landlord  class 
was  hit  hard  by  the  plague.  "Magnates  and  lesser  lords  of  the 
realm  who  had  tenants  made  abatements  of  rent  in  order  to  keep 
their  tenantry;  some  half  the  rent,  some  more,  some  less,  some  for 
two  years,  some  for  three,  some  for  one  year,  according  as  they 
could  agree  with  them. " 

But  this  condition  of  luxury  soon  passed.  Those  who  survived 
found  themselves  personally  richer  than  before;  but  Europe  was 
immeasurably  poorer,  for  production  absolutely  ceased  for  months, 
even  a  whole  year,  and  when  it  was  renewed  the  productive  capacity 
of  Europe  was  found  to  be  much  impaired,  while  the  waste  had  been 
terrific.  When  all  the  accumulated  surplus  had  been  consumed  or 
wasted,  prices  soared  and  the  cost  of  living,  both  of  commodities 
and  of  service,  rose  enormously.  Farm  laborers,  guild  workmen, 
domestic  servants,  clerks,  even  priests,  struck  for  higher  wages. 
"In  the  following  autumn  no  one  could  get  a  reaper  for  less  than 
Sd.  with  his  food ;  a  mower  for  less  than  1 2d.  with  his  food.  Where- 
fore many  crops  perished  in  the  fields  for  want  of  some  one  to  garner 
them.     But  in  the  pestilence  year  there  was  such  abundance  of 

all  kinds  of   corn  that  no  one  troubled  about  it A  man 

could  scarcely  get  a  chaplain  under  ten  pounds  or  ten  marks  to 
minister  to  a  church.  There  was  scarcely  any  one  now  who  was 
willing  to  accept  a  vicarage  for  twenty  pounds."     Even  rents 


568  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

soon  went  up.  Abandoned  buildings  lapsed  into  ruin,  occupied 
buildings  naturally  deteriorated  under  wear  and  tear,  and  the 
wages  of  carpenters  and  other  artisans  were  often  so  high  as  to 
prohibit  repairs. 

The  high  prices  of  staple  commodities  and  the  exorbitant 
demands  of  the  wage-earning  class  soon  reached  a  pinnacle  under 
the  stimulus  of  profiteering.  Accordingly  the  governments  had 
resort  to  maximum  laws  both  for  commodities  and  wages.  France 
passed  a  Statute  of  Laborers  in  1350,  England  a  similar  law  in  1351. 

The  social  effects  of  the  Black  Death  were  manifold.  In  the 
first  place,  then  as  now,  there  was  enormous  displacement  of  popu- 
lation. The  plague  had  the  effect  of  an  invasion;  it  either  killed 
or  drove  out  the  population.  Thousands  fled  to  other  places 
Infected  districts  were  left  deserted.  In  after-years  one  finds 
evidence  of  this  in  interesting  ways.  New  place-names,  new  faces, 
even  unfamiliar  speech  in  various  regions,  attest  it.  One  finds 
evidence  of  Italian  colonies  in  south  German  and  south  French 
cities ;  French  and  Germans  in  north  Italy ;  Flemings  in  Normandy ; 
Normans  in  Picardy,  etc.  Under  the  stress  of  fear  men  were  mad 
to  get  out  of  an  infected  region,  and  fled,  often  into  another  quite  as 
dangerous.  We  find  other  evidence  of  this  movement  of  population 
in  the  outcropping  of  technical  industries  and  crafts,  once  peculiar 
to  a  certain  country,  in  quite  another  place  owing  to  the  flight  of 
workmen  from  the  former  to  the  latter  locahty. 

The  texture  of  society,  too,  was  profoundly  modified  by  the 
Black  Death.  In  addition  to  a  large  class  of  nouveaux  riches, 
the  plague  opened  the  door  of  opportunity  to  many  to  get  into  new 
lines  of  employment,  or  to  establish  themselves  in  new  kinds  of 
business.  Clerks  became  merchants,  former  workmen  became 
employers  and  contractors,  farm  laborers  became  gentlemen 
farmers.  The  old  nobiUty  of  Europe,  which  derived  its  lineage 
from  the  Norman  Conquest  and  the  Crusades,  largely  passed  away, 
leaving  their  titles  and  their  lands  to  the  kings  who  gave  them  out  to 
new  favorites,  so  that  a  new  noblesse  arose  in  Europe,  a  parvenu 
nobility  without  the  accomplishment,  the  pride,  or  the  manners  of 
the  old  noblesse.  The  titles  survived,  but  the  blood  of  the  peerage 
was  new,  not  old ;  parvenu,  not  aristocratic.    With  the  passing  of 


AFTERMATH  OF  BLACK  DEATH  AND  GREAT  WAR       569 

the  aristocracy  passed  also  the  chivalry  and  courtesy  that  had 
distinguished  it.  The  decay  of  manners  in  the  last  half  of  the 
fourteenth  century  is  an  astonishing  fact.  The  old-fashioned 
gentility  was  gone;  manners  were  uncouth,  rough,  brutal.  Famil- 
iar speech  became  rude,  lewd,  even  obscene.  Every  student  of  the 
literature  of  the  fourteenth  and  fifteenth  centuries  has  observed 
this.  This  explains  the  paradox  that  books  on  courtesy  were  so 
much  in  demand  in  these  centuries.  The  new  high  society  was 
ignorant  of  good  manners  and  needed  to  know.  Even  fashions 
reflected  the  decadent  conditions  of  the  age.  Refinement  and 
decorum  in  dress,  which  marked  the  distinguished  lady  and  gentle- 
man in  the  thirteenth  century,  disappeared.  The  nouveaux  riches 
had  a  passion  for  display,  for  garish  colors,  for  excessive  dress, 
for  the  wearing  of  many  jewels.  Dressmakers  and  milliners 
reaped  a  harvest  from  this  class.  The  costumes  were  fabrications 
to  wonder  at,  but  not  to  admire. 

Another  characteristic  of  the  late  fourteenth  century  which 
strikes  a  familiar  note  is  the  protest  against  political  corruption 
and  administrative  inefficiency.  The  cry  for  reform  was  wide- 
spread and  not  to  be  wondered  at.  The  Black  Death  hit  the 
governments  of  Europe  hard.  For  two  hundred  years  these 
governments  had  been  slowly  and  painfully  developing  their 
administrative  machinery  and  training  up  a  skilled  class  of  officials 
in  their  employ.  Now  of  a  sudden  thousands  of  this  technically 
trained  class  were  cut  down,  so  much  so  that  the  governments  were 
crippled  beyond  what  we  may  imagine;  police  protection,  courts, 
law-making,  the  hundred  and  one  everyday  activities  of  an  ordered 
society  were  arrested.  The  machinery  of  the  governments  nearly 
stopped.  In  this  emergency  two  things  happened:  the  offices 
had  to  be  filled,  the  government  kept  running  at  all  cost,  so  that 
thousands  of  ignorant,  incompetent,  dishonest  men  were  hastily 
thrust  into  public  offices;  moreover,  the  thousands  of  vacant 
offices  tempted  the  job-hunter,  the  placeman,  the  professional 
office-seeker,  and  this  class  swarmed  into  the  vacancies  with  the 
selfish  motive  of  feathering  their  own  nests  and  plundering  the 
public.  The  result  was  appalling  waste,  great  maladministration, 
peculation,  etc.,  with  the  natural  protest  of  society  against  these 
abuses. 


570  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

The  church  was  no  better  oflf  than  the  state  in  this  particular. 
Every  student  of  medieval  history  knows  the  outcry  that  arose  in 
Europe  in  the  last  half  of  the  fourteenth  century  against  the  abuses 
and  corruption  in  the  church.  But  the  church  is  not  to  be  blamed 
too  severely  for  this  condition.  It,  too,  had  to  keep  functioning, 
and  to  do  so  impressed  into  service  all  sorts  and  conditions  of  men; 
in  the  universal  terror  it  could  not  be  over-careful  in  those  whom  it 
selected.  And  again,  church  offices  were  lucrative  and  influential 
appointments,  and  many  intruded  themselves  into  church  Hvings 
for  the  sake  of  the  material  nature  of  the  preferment. 

Complaints  against  political  and  administrative  corruption, 
the  prevalence  and  increase  of  crime,  lightness  of  mind,  and  looseness 
of  morals,  high  prices,  profiteering,  industrial  and  farm  strikes, 
extravagance,  indolence,  or  refusal  to  go  to  work  are  common 
and  widespread  today.  So  they  were  in  the  fourteenth  century. 
The  Black  Death  wrought  a  universal  upheaval  and  transformation 
of  society  to  which  nothing  else  in  history  is  comparable  except 
the  influence  of  the  Great  War. 

Even  in  the  field  of  psychology  this  analogy  holds  true.  Not 
only  those  who  actually  fought  in  the  late  war,  but  the  whole 
population  is  suffering  from  "shell  shock,"  from  frayed  nerves. 
It  is  this  condition  which  explains  the  semi-hysterical  state  of  mind 
of  millions  in  Europe,  which  accounts  for  their  fevered  or  morbid 
emotionalism.  The  old  barriers  are  down,  the  old  inhibitions 
removed.  The  superficial  yet  fevered  gaiety,  the  proneness  to 
debauchery,  the  wild  wave  of  extravagance,  the  flamboyant 
luxury,  the  gluttony  in  restaurant  and  cafe— all  these  phenomena 
are  readily  explicable  by  the  student  used  to  making  psycho-social 
analyses.  And  as  always  at  such  seasons,  the  phenomena  of  the 
Freudian  complex  are  vividly  presented.  A  book  could  be  written 
solely  upon  the  strange,  intense,  morbid  sex  manifestations  abroad 
in  the  world  at  present. 

It  was  so  after  the  Black  Death.  The  so-called  Flagellant 
movement  was  a  mixture  of  religious  morbidity  and  sex  stimuli,  so 
widespread  in  its  influence  that  it  reduced  thousands  to  a  state  of 
frenzy.  Not  since  the  Crusades  had  Europe  witnessed  so  tremen- 
dous a  manifestation  of  mob  psychology.     In  the  lapse  of  all  the 


AFTERMATH  OF  BLACK  DEATH  AND  GREAT  WAR       571 

accustomed  inhibitions  of  church,  of  state,  of  society,  the  thought 
and  conduct  of  men  went  off  on  eccentric  tangents.  The  failure  of 
old  authorities  gave  room  for  new  and  self-constituted  authorities 
to  establish  themselves.  Charlatans,  mind-readers,  sorcerers, 
witch-doctors,  drug-vendors,  sprang  up  like  mushrooms,  along  with 
perfervid  crossroads  preachers  and  soap-box  orators  denouncing 
society  and  the  wrongs  around  them,  and  offering  each  his  panacea 
or  remedy.  A  golden  opportunity  was  afforded  to  the  ama- 
teur preacher,  the  amateur  reformer,  the  pseudo-scientist,  the 
grafter. 

The  literature  of  the  late  Middle  Ages  is  rich  in  the  possession 
of  this  kind  of  psycho-social  phenomena,  which  has  not  yet  been 
studied.  Few  even  know  of  it.  It  may  surprise  the  reader  to 
learn  that  probably  the  well-known  legend  about  the  Pied  Piper 
of  Hamelin  is  attached  to  the  time  of  the  Black  Death.  Grotesque 
and  amusing  as  Browning's  famous  ballad  is,  there  is  yet  a  tragic 
pathos  underneath  the  tale,  which  he  failed  to  divine.  Browning, 
as  all  his  readers,  regarded  the  story  as  a  mere  legend.  But 
undeniably  there  is  a  basis  of  real  history  below  the  surface. 

In  the  first  place  it  is  a  well-known  historical  fact  that  the  Black 
Death  was  accompanied  by  a  great  plague  of  rats  in  Europe. 
Now  the  rat  has  been  a  symbol  of  pestilence  since  remote  antiquity. 
One  need  go  no  farther  than  the  Old  Testament  for  evidence  of 
this,  and  the  s}Tnbolism  is  attested  by  ancient  art.  What  probably 
happened  at  Hamelin  was  this:  the  town  was  infested  by  rats; 
the  Pied  Piper  made  his  appearance  (whether  a  charlatan  or  a 
lunatic  cannot  be  said)  and  offered  to  charm  the  rats  away.  The 
rats  probably  stayed,  but  the  Piper's  strange  costume  and  stranger 
power  which  he  declared  that  he  possessed,  united  with  the  intense, 
even  hysterical  emotionalism  of  the  people,  working  upon  the 
natural  curiosity  of  children  at  sight  of  such  a  wondrous  spectacle 
as  the  Piper  in  their  streets,  lured  the  children  after  him  and  they 
were  scattered,  never  to  return.  The  poor  children  were  swept 
away  on  a  wave  of  crowd  psychology,  of  emotional  excitement,  to 
the  point  of  hysteria.  They  suffered  the  fate  of  those  who  went 
on  the  Children's  Crusade,  many  of  whom  we  know  fell  into  the 
hands  of  professional  kidnapers  and  slavers. 


572  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

A  book  might  be  written  upon  these  peculiar  and  eccentric 
effects  of  the  Black  Death,  as  many  will  write  books  in  the  near 
future  upon  the  social  psychology  of  Europe  since  the  war.  The 
parallel  which  I  have  made  is  not  a  perfect  one,  of  course,  but  there 
is  sufficient  analogy  between  the  aftermath  of  the  Black  Death 
and  the  aftermath  of  the  Great  War  to  enlist  the  serious  considera- 
tion of  the  student  of  history. 


A  NORMAL-SCHOOL  COURSE  IN  SOCIOLOGY 

INTRODUCTORY  TO  WORK  IN  THE 

SOCIAL  STUDIES 


WILLARD  W.  BEATTY 
State  Normal  School,  San  Francisco,  California 


As  stated  by  Mr.  Clow  in  his  report  on  "Sociology  in  Normal 
Schools"  in  the  March,  1920,  Journal  of  Sociology,  the  California 
State  Board  of  Education  has  within  the  last  few  years  made  certain 
minimum  requirements  in  sociology  as  part  of  the  professional 
work  in  normal  schools.  In  expressing  these  requirements,  one  of 
the  units  of  work  specifically  called  for  is  "Civic  Sociology."  It  is 
doubtful  whether  the  educators  responsible  for  this  requirement 
possessed  any  clear  definition  for  "Civic  Sociology"  in  their  own 
minds.  It  is  assuredly  true  that  no  two  of  the  Cahfornia  normal 
schools  have  interpreted  the  term  in  the  same  way.  It  may  be  of 
some  value  to  outline  a  tentative  course  which  has  been  utilized  in 
one  such  school  during  the  past  year  in  an  endeavor  to  realize  the 
intention  of  the  state  board. 

The  aims  of  the  course,  as  seen  at  San  Francisco,  were  three- 
fold: first,  the  supplying  of  a  background  of  science  and  broad 
general  interest  as  an  introduction  to  the  social  studies;  second, 
an  attempt  to  stimulate  interest  in  an  understanding  and  inter- 
pretation of  the  place  of  the  individual  in  the  present  social  organi- 
zation; third,  and,  with  us,  most  important,  the  preparation  of  the 
individual  student  to  meet  the  social  problem  of  the  teacher  in  the 
discipline  of  the  school  in  a  manner  calculated  to  help  her  in  han- 
dUng  it  as  a  problem  in  citizenship  training.  The  time  allowed  for 
this  course  was  approximately  sixty  hours  during  one  semester. 

A  glance  at  the  outline  of  the  material  as  presented  in  the 
succeeding  pages  shows  that  the  actual  classroom  time  was  utterly 
inadequate  to  more  than  touch  upon  a  majority  of  the  topics  pre- 
sented, and  that  the  ultimate  value  of  the  work  must  have  depended 
upon  the  outside  reading  done  in  following  up  the  assignments. 

S73 


574  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

Although  no  specified  amount  of  reading  was  required,  a  fairly- 
automatic  check  of  whether  or  not  the  reading  was  being  done  was 
offered  by  the  quality  of  each  day's  discussion,  which,  in  every  case, 
was  based  upon  previously  assigned  references.  In  actual  fact, 
the  reading  in  a  majority  of  cases  exceeded  what  would  have  been 
considered  a  reasonable  requirement  and  in  many  instances  exceeded 
the  actual  references. 

Before  discussing  the  method  of  presentation  and  different 
phases  of  the  course  in  detail,  the  following  general  outline  of  the 
work  is  presented: 

A  COURSE  OUTLINE  IN  CIVIC  SOCIOLOGY 
I.  The  Idea  of  Space,  and  the  Stellar  Relationships 

A.  The  Immense  Magnitude  of  Space 

a)  Understanding  of  the  terms  "star,"  "planet,"  "nebula,"  etc., 
with  their  relationships 

h)  Extent  of  space;  distances 

c)  Appreciation  of  the  fact  that  the  universe  responds  to  "law" — 
some  dehberate  attempt  to  develop  a  sense  of  inspiration  and  awe 
at  the  works  of  creation,  based  upon  scientific  appreciation 

B.  A  Brief  Study  of  the  Myths  of  Creation.  Conceptions  of  primitive 
peoples,  with  some  reference  to  their  points  of  unity  in  explaining 
natural  phenomena 

C.  The  Birth  of  the  World 

a)  Some  understanding  of  the  conceptions  of  Laplace,  Herschel,  and 

Kant,  and  the  Chamberlain-Moulton  hypothesis 
h)  The  soundness  of  observational  conclusions — inductive  reasoning 
c)  Some  of  the  astronomical  observations  upon  which  the  explanations 
of  solar  origin  rest 
II.  The  Dawn  of  Life — The  Evolutionary  Idea 

A.  The  Geologic  Evidence  of  the  Earth's  Development.  The  structure  ot 
the  earth's  surface  and  its  organic  content 

a)  The  development  of  life-forms  from  simple  to  complex,  as  revealed 
by  geologic  investigation 

B.  The  Comparative  Data  Substantiating  the  Evolutionary  Theory 

a)  Data  and  conclusions  of  Darwin 

b)  Data  and  conclusions  of  DeVries,  etc. 

C.  The  Embryonic  Evidence  of  Recapitulation 

a)  Fertilization  and  ontogeny 

b)  Chromosomes  as  the  bearers  of  "unit  characters,"  etc. 
III.  Primitive  Man 

A.  Apparent  Age  of  the  Race  from  Geologic  Evidence;  the  Java,  Nean- 
derthal, Cro-Magnon,  etc.,  Men 


A  NORMAL-SCHOOL  COURSE  IN  SOCIOLOGY  575 

B.  Apparent  Distribution.  From  Java  to  England,  swinging  through 
Southern  India,  Mesopotamia,  Mediterranean  Basin,  Central  Europe 
to  British  Isles 

a)  On  a  basis  of  geologic  evidence,  see  previous  section 

b)  On  a  basis  of  ethnic  relationship,  see  succeeding  section 

C.  Race  Types.  A  study  of  the  Aryan-Caucasian  distribution  and  the 
apparent  Africo-Asiatic  offshoots 

a)  Head  shape,  facial  index,  etc.,  in  determining  racial  similarity 

b)  Influence  of  geography  upon  race  development.  See  "C"  below, 
further 

IV.  Societal  Evolution 

A.  The  "Ages  of  Man" 

a)  Paleolithic,  NeoUthic,  Bronze,  Iron.  Are  they  chronological  or 
coexistent  ? 

b)  Hunter,  herder,  agriculturist,  industrialist.  Are  they  chronological 
or  coexistent  ? 

c)  Individual,  family,  clan,  tribe,  city-state,  nation.  'Chronological 
or  coexistent  ? 

B.  Prerequisites  to  the  Development  of  Civilization 

a)  Climatic 

b)  Geographic 

c)  Activity 

C.  Influences  of  Geographic  Environment  on  Civilization 

a)  Geographic  "paths."     Their  influence  on  the  spread  of  culture 

b)  Geographic  "situation"  and  its  influence;  isolation  vs.  central 
location;  India  contrasted  to  Greece;  Alpine  race  vs.  inhabitants 
of  Rhine  valley;  Britain  vs.  Russia 

c)  Situation  and  world-conflict;  Babylon  and  Persia;  Persia  and 
Greece;  Rome  and  Carthage;  France  and  Germany 

d)  Discovery  of  New  World  and  results  of  consequent  population 
movements 

D.  Study  of  the  Tigris-Euphrates  States.    "The  Cradle  of  CiviHzation" 

a)  Social  development,  customs,  laws,  education,  culture,  "Code  of 
Hammurabi" 

b)  Economic  development,  use  of  slave  labor,  lack  of  mechanical  help 

c)  Comparison  and  contrast  with  modern  civilization 

d)  Increasing  integration  of  social  units 

E.  Cycles  of  Civilization — Growth  of  the  Known  World 

a)  Independent  rise  of  cultural  groups:  Egypt,  Chaldea,  Crete,  India, 
Mexico,  China,  etc. 

b)  Evidence  of  prior  civilizations  to  these:  archaeological  data 

c)  Rise  and  fall  of  Babylon,  of  Greece,  of  Rome.  Replacement  by 
"barbarian  tribes."    The  steppes  as  origins  of  racial  migrations 

d)  Disappearance  of  industrial  secrets,  etc.;  forgotten  monuments 


576  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

e)  For  the  first  time  a  civilization  has  annihilated  time  and  space  and 
explored  the  entire  globe;  possibilities  of  the  future;  Malthusian 
theories 

F.  Influence  of  Instincts  and  Emotions  on  Societal  Evolution 
a)  Social  psychology — McDougall 

h)  Studies  in  the  unconscious — Freud 

c)  Satisfactions  and  inhibitions  of  instincts  in  social  development 

d)  Influence  of  the  mores  working  through  instincts  to  conserve  the 
existing  order  and  inhibit  progress 

e)  In-group  and  out-group 

/)  What  determines  right  and  wrong  (study  of  classroom  case  prob- 
lems) 

G.  ReUgion  and  Social  Development 

a)  Comparative  social  virtues  as  presented  by  Confucius,  Buddha, 
Christ,  and  Mahommet 

b)  Religious  martyrdom  and  violation  of  the  mores 

c)  Rise  of  science  and  philosophy,  occupying  part  of  the  intellectual 
sphere  once  reserved  to  religion 

V.  Cycles  of  History — A  Brief  Study  of  Recurring  Social  Phe- 
nomena. (No  attempt  to  be  exhaustive,  simply  to  illustrate  again 
through  a  few  typical  historical  instances,  the  cycle  form  of  the  develop- 
ment of  civilization) 

A.  Appearance  of  written  law.  (Codes  of  Hammurabi,  Draco,  etc.,  in 
Babylon,  Greece,  Rome,  feudal  Europe,  etc.) 

B.  Attempt  to  equalize  voting  privileges;  the  evolution  of  the  "geo- 
graphical tribe"  in  Greece,  Rome,  down  to  our  modern  precinct  and 
district 

C.  Land  problem;  the  reiterated  attempt  to  break  up  the  landed  estates; 
Greece,  Rome,  feudal  Europe,  modern  Mexico,  and  Russia;  the 
reclamation  work  of  the  United  States  and  the  colonization  schemes  of 
the  California  Land  Settlement  Board  in  adaptation  of  the  Australian 
system 

VI.  Topic  Reports  on  Modern  Social  and  Industrial  Problems 

The  approximate  time  allotment  was  about  as  follows:  one- 
sixth  of  the  total  to  Sections  I,  II,  and  III;  one-third  to  Section 
IV;  one-sixth  to  Section  V ;  one- third  to  Section  VI. 

No  general  textbook  was  possible  because  of  the  great  range  of 
topics.  Chapin's  Introduction  to  the  Study  of  Social  Evolution 
came  the  nearest  to  paralleling  the  first  part  of  the  course,  and  was 
therefore  used  by  practically  everyone  for  the  work  of  the  first 
four  sections.     Lull,  Evolution  of  the  Earth,  was  found  to  be  a  little 


A  NORMAL-SCHOOL  COURSE  IN  SOCIOLOGY  577 

more  difficult  reading,  but  was  of  general  use.  The  Book  of  Knowl- 
edge and  Our  Wonder  World  offered  material  of  equal  diversity 
and  were  much  used.  Other  than  these,  a  wide  list  of  suggested 
references  was  offered,  some  better  than  others,  and  some  more 
difficult  than  others.     This  list  follows: 

BIBLIOGRAPHY  OF  REFERENCES 

SECTION  I 

C.  W.  Washburne,  The  Story  of  the  Earth 
R.  S.  Ball,  The  Earth's  Beginning 

,  Starland 

A.  M.  M.  Griffith,  The  Stars  and  Their  Stories 

J.  R.  Kippax,  The  Call  of  the  Stars 

G.  P.  Serviss,  Astronomy  with  the  Naked  Eye 

E.  S.  Holden,  The  Family  of  the  Sun 

E.  Hawks,  Boys'  Book  of  Astronomy 

H.  H.  Turner,  A  Voyage  in  Space 

Chamberlain  and  Salisbury,  Geology 

H.  W.  Mabie,  Norse  Myths 

C.  M.  Gay  ley,  Classic  Myths 
Thomas  Bulfinch,  Age  of  Fable 
,  Otir  Wonder  World,  Vol.  I. 

SECTION  n 

H.  F.  Osbom,  Origin  and  Evolution  of  Life 

,  Age  of  Mammals 

J.  W.  Dawson,  Story  of  the  Earth  and  Man 
H.  N.  Hutchinson,  Extinct  Monsters 
Margaret  Morley,  The  Song  of  Life 
J.  A.  Thomson,  The  Wonder  of  Life 

,  The  Bible  of  Nature 

,  Darwinism  and  Human  Life 

Wm.  A.  Locy,  Biology  and  Its  Makers 

D.  S.  Jordan,  Animal  Studies 

C.  R.  Gibson,  The  Great  Ball  on  Which  We  Live 

J.  I.  Mix,  Mighty  Animals 

Michael  Guyer,  Being  Well  Born 

M.  M.  Metcalf,  Organic  Evolution 

A.  Dendy,  Outlines  of  Evolutionary  Biology 

Rolt-Wheeler,  The  Motister  Hunters 

Stanley  Waterloo,  The  Story  of  Ab 

C.  W.  Washburne,  The  Story  of  the  Earth 


578  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

E.  S.  Grew,  The  Romance  of  Modern  Geology 
Agnes  Giberne,  The  Romance  of  the  Mighty  Deep 
Chamberlain  and  Salisbury,  Geology 

W.  D.  Mathews,  Dinaiisaurs  (Amer.  Museum  of  Natural  History) 

SECTION  m 

J.  P.  True,  The  Iron  Star 

Theodore  Roosevelt,  "How  Old  Is  Man?"  (National  Geographic  Magazine,  Feb- 
ruary, 1916) 

F.  Ratzel,  The  History  of  Mankind 

.   Osborn,  Men  of  the  Old  Stone  Age 
F.  A.  Lucas,  Animals  of  the  Past 

,  Animals  Before  Man  in  North  America 

Stanley  Waterloo,  The  Story  of  Ab 
,  Son  of  the  Ages 

Many  of  the  books  previously  noted,  especially  Chapin's  Social  Evolution 

SECTION  IV 

James  Baikie,  "The  Cradle  of  Civilization"  (National  Geographic  Magazine,  , 

February,  19 16)  I 

A.  T.  Clay,  "Pushing  Back  History's  Horizon"  (National  Geographic  Maga- 
zine, February,  1916) 

H.  G.  F.  Spurrell,  Modern  Man  and  His  Forerunners 

W.  H.  Prcscott,  Conquest  of  Mexico — Conquest  of  Peru 

E.  C.  Semple,  Influence  of  Geographic  Environment 

,  American  History  and  Its  Geographic  Conditions 

E.  Huntington,  Climate  and  Civilization 

,  The  Pulse  of  Asia 

,  Palestine  and  Its  Transformation 

Perry  Brigham,  Geographic  Influences  in  American  History 
W.  I.  Thomas,  Source  Book  of  Social  Origins 
W.  G.  Sumner,  Folkways 

F.  S.  Chapin,  Education  and  the  Mores 
L.  F.  Ward,  Applied  Sociology 
H.  P.  Fairchild,  Applied  Sociology 
J.  K.  Hart,  Democracy  in  Education 
Franklin  Bobbitt,  The  Curriculum 
W.  Trotter,  Instinct  of  the  Herd  in  Peace  and  War 
Gustav  LeBon,  The  Crowd 
E.  A.  Ross,  Social  Psychology 

,  Sin  and  Society 

W.  McDougall,  Social  Psychology 
Hitschmann-Payne,  Freud's  Theory  of  the  Neuroses 


A  NORMAL-SCHOOL  COURSE  IN  SOCIOLOGY  579 

Wilfrid  Lay,  Man's  Unconscious  Conflict 
Wm.  Healy,  Mental  Conflicts  and  Misconduct 

,  The  Child's  Unconscious  Mind 

,  The  Individual  Delinquent 

C.  A.  Ellwood,  Sociology  in  Its  Psychological  Aspects 
Great  Religions  of  the  World  (Harper),  Collected  Papers 
Allan  Menzies,  History  of  Religion 
Lord  Dunsany,  A  Dreamer's  Tale — The  Sword  and  the  Idol 

For  Section  V  references  were  made  to  any  one  of  a  number  of 

high-school  history  texts,  as  well  as  other  historical  material.  The 
following  monthly  and  weekly  periodicals,  in  addition  to  specific 
pubHcations,  were  used  in  connection  with  the  current  reports: 
Review  of  Reviews,  World's  Work,  Current  Opinion,  Current  History, 
Outlook,  Literary  Digest,  New  Republic,  Nation,  Harvey's  Weekly, 
Leslie's  Weekly,  Survey,  Manchester  Guardian  Weekly  Edition. 

Throughout  the  course  it  was  attempted  to  keep  the  discussion 
on  a  Socratic  basis  wherever  possible,  the  instructor  attempting  to 
arouse  the  questioning  attitude  and  avoid  direct  statement.  In 
the  first  part  of  the  work  this  was  rather  difficult  because  the 
students  lacked  the  informational  background  to  sustain  discussion. 
The  method  proved  successful  in  stimulating  reading,  and  as  the 
reading  increased  the  discussions  naturally  improved. 

One  of  the  chief  handicaps  from  the  informational  standpoint 
was  due  to  the  small  amount  of  current  newspaper  and  periodical 
reading  done  by  the  average  normal  student.  The  topics  assigned 
for  individual  report  were  given  out  about  eight  weeks  before  due, 
and  in  many  instances  stimulated  this  type  of  reading,  with  results 
which  became  increasingly  evident  in  the  course  of  the  later  dis- 
cussions. 

Throughout  the  discussions  it  was  constantly  kept  before  the 
students  that  the  type  of  material  introduced  was  of  three  kinds: 
facts,  experimentally  established  and  accepted;  generally  accepted 
theories  based  upon  many  proved  facts;  opinions.  All  material 
discussed  was  classified  accordingly,  and  of  course  every  attempt 
was  made  to  consider  various  theories  and  many  opinions.  The 
instructor  carefully  avoided  any  tendency  to  emphasize  "pet" 
theories,  and  it  is  probable  that  at  the  close  of  the  course  each 


58o  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

theory  had  its  adherents,  and  a  variety  of  opinions  were  held  by 
different  members  of  the  class. 

The  course  was  given  in  both  the  fall  and  spring  semesters. 
One  group  of  students  took  the  work  while  assigned  to  classroom 
teaching,  and  the  other  group  while  doing  nothing  but  preparatory 
work.  The  first  group  was  in  every  way  more  alive  to  the  possi- 
bilities of  the  course,  and  during  the  discussion  of  instincts  and 
emotions,  which  were  illustrated  by  classroom  cases  and  examples, 
saw  and  profited  much  more  by  the  applications  to  their  current 
experience. 

Although  an  experiment,  attempting  in  almost  kaleidoscopic 
fashion  to  survey  many  fields,  a  judgment  formed  sometime  after 
the  product  had  passed  on  to  other  experiences  is  that  the  work 
was  successful  in  realizing  the  aims  laid  out.  It  is  not  to  be  thought 
that  any  pretense  of  thorough  or  complete  study  of  any  one  of  the 
topics  enumerated  was  made.  Following  this  course,  each  student 
prepared  in  greater  detail  the  material  included  in  the  courses  of 
history,  geography,  general  science,  and  life-science — it  is  hoped 
and  believed  with  a  better  realization  of  the  natural  correlation 
existing. 

Of  course  the  question  remains.  Is  this  civic  sociology?  I 
submit  that  this  answer  is  as  good  as  the  next,  and  in  aim  and 
realization  justifies  the  assertion  that  it  is. 


INDUSTRIAL  DEMOCRACY 


JEROME  DOWD 
Norman,  Oklahoma 


Now  that  the  world-war  for  democracy  is  terminated  and 
autocracy  forever  banished,  at  least  from  Europe,  the  most  amaz- 
ing fact  which  emerges  for  our  reflection  is  that  this  achievement 
had  to  be  brought  about  at  a  cost  of  life  and  property  beyond 
that  of  any  other  achievement  in  the  history  of  mankind.  Indeed, 
it  is  inexpressibly  amazing  that  the  object  aimed  at  and  gained 
could  not  have  been  reached  through  the  exercise  of  human  reason 
in  applying  to  the  situation  those  fundamental  principles  which 
have  been  observed  to  be  characteristic  of  the  whole  progress  of 
civilization.  If  there  is  one  fact  of  social  evolution  standing  out 
more  clearly  than  another  it  is  that  the  trend  of  all  institutions 
in  the  Western  World  has  been  away  from  autocracy  and  pater- 
naHsm  and  toward  freedom  and  democracy.  This  trend  has 
been  conspicuous  in  industry,  in  the  family,  in  religion,  and  in 
government.  The  world-war  had  to  be  fought  out  simply  because 
some  of  the  nations  of  the  earth  were  blind  to  this  universal  trend. 
It  will  always  stand  out  as  one  of  the  most  remarkable  discord- 
ances of  history  that  a  people  so  profoundly  learned  as  the 
Germans  should  have  remained  totally  blind  to  the  most  obvious 
facts  of  human  history,  and  should  have  perpetuated  in  their 
social  organization  those  paternal  aspects  of  industry,  the  family, 
rehgion,  and  government  which  have  been  against  the  whole  trend 
of  civilization.  How  much  better  it  would  have  been  for  the 
world  if  Emperor  William  and  his  military  aristocracy  had  per- 
ceived the  trend  of  civilization  and  had  sought  to  guide  it  toward 
its  destination.  But  such  seems  to  be  the  aberration  of  a  privi- 
leged class  everywhere  that,  owl-like,  the  more  Hght  they  have  the 
darker  their  vision,  and  they  always  incumber  the  path  of  progress 
and  have  to  be  ejected  by  violence. 

581 


582  TUE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

Let  us  hope  that  the  last  great  battle  has  been  fought  for 
political  freedom;  that  the  world  is  now  safe  for  all  democratic 
nations,  and  that  the  few  remaining  monarchies  will  soon  undergo 
a  peaceful  evolution  into  self-governing  states. 

In  the  meantime,  before  the  smoke  of  battle  of  the  world-war 
has  quite  cleared  away,  we  see  the  horizon  in  every  direction 
ablaze  with  another  revolution  of  far  greater  extent  and  impor- 
tance than  the  one  we  are  rejoicing  to  have  brought  to  an  end. 
This  new  revolution,  now  flaring  up  in  every  country,  is  merely  a 
logical  consequence  of  the  one  just  ended.  It  is  a  revolution  in 
the  direction  of  democracy  in  industry;  and  it  will  go  on,  like  the 
political  revolution  of  the  past,  in  spite  of  all  opposition,  until  it 
is  everywhere  an  accompHshed  fact. 

The  peace  of  the  world  now  hinges  upon  the  attitude  which  the 
capitalists  and  all  enlightened  citizens  will  manifest  toward  this 
new  revolution.  WiU  they  have  the  vision  to  perceive  the  inev- 
itable trend  of  industrial  evolution,  and  seek  to  guide  it  toward 
its  destination,  or  will  they,  like  the  German  aristocracy  in  the 
political  revolution,  remain  blind  and  set  themselves  as  incum- 
brances in  the  path  of  progress?  Their  attitude  toward  this 
movement  will  determine  whether  it  shall  move  on  peacefully  or 
become  a  flame,  as  in  Russia.  When  this  revolution  has  run  its 
triumphant  course,  will  the  historian  look  back  with  amazement  at 
the  same  blindness  and  imbecility  of  the  capitaKsts  that  character- 
ized the  Germans  in  their  attitude  toward  the  political  revolution  ? 

In  the  industrial  world  we  see  labor  and  capital  divided  into 
hostile  camps,  wasting  their  strength  and  resources  in  warfare 
and  inflicting  manifold  sufferings  upon  the  non-combatant  popula- 
tion. Will  these  contending  forces  ever  sign  an  armistice  and 
form  a  league  to  enforce  future  peace,  or  will  the  war  go  on  until 
the  social  structure  collapses  and  crushes  both  of  them  ? 

I  believe  that  it  is  entirely  feasible  to  bring  about  a  permanent 
peace  between  labor  and  capital  through  the  application  of  demo- 
cratic principles  to  industry;  and,  in  the  interest  of  that  peace, 
I  will  venture  to  indicate  the  fundamental  wrong  in  the  present 
relationship  of  labor  and  capital  and  the  kind  of  reconstruction 
needed  to  adjust  industry  to  a  democratic  basis. 


INDUSTRIAL  DEMOCRACY  583 

At  the  outset  of  this  problem  we  should  recall  that  the  regime 
of  labor  and  capital  has  certain  inherent  disadvantages,  generally 
recognized  by  economists  and  sociologists,  which  render  it  incom- 
patible with  industrial  efficiency.  The  French  economist  Charles 
Gide,  for  instance,  says: 

Leaving  the  high  ground  of  justice,  and  using  the  criterion  of  social  util- 
ity, the  contract  of  wages  is  seen  to  have  a  vice  which  absolutely  condemns 
it.  As  soon  as  the  laborer  surrenders  his  interest  in  the  product  of  his  labor, 
he  loses  all  stimulus  to  production;  nay,  it  is  obviously  to  his  advantage  to 
do  as  little  work  as  possible  in  return  for  the  price  the  master  pays  for  his 
labor.  He  can  only  be  made  to  act  otherwise  by  the  sentiment  of  duty  or  the 
sentiment  of  fear;  fear  not  of  the  whip,  as  the  slave  feels,  but  of  dismissal, 
and  of  the  loss  of  his  livelihood.  The  first  of  these  motives  can  only  influence 
minds  of  a  higher  stamp,  and,  moreover,  grows  weaker  as  the  antagonism 
between  masters  and  workmen  becomes  more  pronounced.  The  second 
motive — and  human  nature  may  boast  of  the  fact — has  never  wrung  any 
good  result  from  man. 

Further,  the  interests  of  masters  and  workmen  inevitably  clash,  and  the 
wage  system  does  not  become  more  bearable  for  its  fatal  offspring — the  strike. 
No  one  denies  that  the  contract  of  wages  is  advantageous  in  certain  cases; 
but  what  is  contrary  to  nature  is  that  this  form  of  contract  should  become  the 
general  law  of  present  society,  so  that,  of  their  own  free  wiU  or  not,  the  labor- 
ing masses  are  dispossessed  of  all  rights  over  the  produce  of  their  labor,  and 
are  deprived  of  all  interest  in  the  work  of  production.  Such  a  state  of  things 
can  scarcely  be  regarded  as  final. 

The  modern  laborer,  in  contrast  to  the  slave,  has  a  theoretical 
liberty,  but  in  reality  he  has  often  only  the  choice  of  deciding 
under  what  master  he  will  spend  the  greater  part  of  his  life,  with 
no  more  interest  in  the  outcome  of  his  labor  than  a  slave  has, 
with  no  opportunity  for  individual  initiative  or  self-reahzation, 
and  no  certainty  in  the  tenure  of  his  employment.     Carlyle  says: 

The  Uberty  especially  which  has  to  purchase  itself  by  social  isolation, 
and  each  man  standing  separate  from  the  other,  having  no  business  with  him 
but  a  cash  account:  this  is  such  liberty  as  the  earth  seldom  saw — as  the  earth 
will  not  long  put  up  with,  recommend  it  as  you  may.  This  liberty  turns 
out,  before  it  has  long  continued  in  action,  with  ail  men  throwing  up  their 
caps  around  it,  to  be,  for  the  Working  MiUions,  a  liberty  to  die  for  want  of 
food;  for  the  Idle  Thousands  and  Units,  also,  a  still  more  fatal  Uberty  to 
live  in  want  of  work:  to  have  no  earnest  duty  to  do  in  this  God's  World  any 
more.    What  becomes  of  a  man  in  such  predicament  ?    Earth's  laws  are  silent, 


584  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

and  Heaven's  speak  in  a  voice  which  is  not  heard.  No  work,  and  the  ineradi- 
cable need  of  work,  give  rise  to  new  very  wondrous  life-philosophies,  life- 
practices.  Brethren,  we  know  but  imperfectly  yet,  after  ages  of  constitutional 
government,  what  Liberty  and  Slavery  are. 

Even  so  arch  an  enemy  of  everything  socialistic  as  Herbert 
Spencer  could  see  nothing  durable  in  the  regime  of  labor  and 
capital.  In  his  judgment  it  was  only  a  transitional  stage  between 
the  coercive  system  of  the  past  and  some  freer  form  of  associa- 
tion of  the  future. 

The  laborer  in  modern  times  does  not  have  a  proper  incentive 
to  self-realization.  Because  he  lacks  this  incentive  he  finds  his 
work  uninteresting,  monotonous,  and  often  very  irksome,  and  he 
seeks  to  limit  it  to  as  few  hours  as  possible.  On  the  other  hand, 
professional  men,  such  as  artists,  scientists,  lawyers,  and  doctors, 
often  find  their  work  so  interesting  that  they  cannot  do  as  much 
of  it  as  they  would  willingly  do  within  the  limited  years  of  their 
lifetime.  If  we  analyze  the  two  classes  of  workers  we  shall  find 
that  the  difference  in  their  attitude  toward  work  is  due  not  so 
much  to  the  difference  in  the  character  of  the  work  as  in  the  con- 
ditions under  which  it  is  performed.  The  painter,  sculptor,  scien- 
tist, and  professional  men  generally,  work  under  conditions  that 
bring  into  play  certain  fundamental  instincts  which  always  awaken 
interest  and  a  feeling  of  exhilaration.  For  instance,  the  instinct 
of  pugnacity  which  comes  into  play  whenever  man  is  inspired  to 
overcome  anything;  the  instinct  of  curiosity  which  comes  into 
play  whenever  man  is  inspired  to  investigate  or  pry  into  anything; 
the  instinct  of  self-assertion  which  comes  into  play  whenever  man 
is  inspired  to  excel  another  or  win  any  triumph  over  nature;  and 
the  constructive  instinct  which  comes  into  play  whenever  man  is 
inspired  to  invent,  organize,  or  combine  anything  for  a  definite 
object.  The  secret  of  keeping  a  child  amused,  and  out  of  mischief, 
consists  in  supplying  it  with  playthings  that  keep  these  instincts 
busy. 

The  reason  that  work  is  generally  repellent  to  the  average 
wageworker  is  that  it  affords  no  opportunity  for  the  employment 
of  these  life-sustaining  instincts.  A  man  who  is  merely  paid  for 
his  time,  and  who  has  no  share  in  the  control  of  the  business  in 


INDUSTRIAL  DEMOCRACY  585 

which  he  works,  is  necessarily  deprived  of  those  stimulations 
which  are  essential  to  a  normal  and  satisfied  human  being.  Unless 
the  laborer  feels  responsibility  for  the  fate  of  the  industry  in  which 
he  works,  he  cannot,  like  the  capitaUst  or  professional  man,  enjoy 
the  exhilaration  of  putting  his  whole  soul  and  body  into  a  hfe- 
career  with  the  hope  of  reaping  the  fruits  of  his  labor.  Under 
present  conditions  only  the  capitalist  class  and  the  professional 
class  have  any  individual  initiative. 

The  more  labor  is  specialized  the  more  the  laborer  is  degraded 
by  being  reduced  to  play  a  purely  mechanical  part  in  production. 
"It  is  a  sad  confession  for  a  man  to  make,"  says Lemontey,  "that 
during  his  whole  life  he  has  constructed  nothing  more  than  the 
eighteenth  part  of  a  pin." 

Also,  the  more  specialized  the  work  the  more  helpless  is  the 
worker  when  turned  off  or  when  industrial  fluctuations  force  him 
to  seek  a  new  master.     Carlyle  says: 

A  man  willing  to  work  and  unable  to  find  work,  is  perhaps  the  saddest 
sight  that  Fortune  exhibits  under  this  Sun.  Burns  expresses  feeUngly  what 
thoughts  it  gave  him:  A  poor  man  seeking  to  work,  seeking  to  toil  that  he 
might  be  fed  and  sheltered,  that  he  might  be  put  on  a  level  with  the  four- 
footed  workers  of  the  Planet  which  is  his.  There  is  not  a  horse  willing  to 
work  but  can  get  food  in  requital,  a  thing  this  two-footed  worker  has  to  seek 
for,  to  soUcit  occasionally  in  vain. 

Some  of  our  progressive  capitalists,  realizing  the  shortcomings 
of  the  wage  system,  seek  to  encourage  initiative  among  their 
workmen  by  offering  prizes  for  any  inventions  or  innovations  that 
they  may  originate  and  reveal  to  the  management.  For  example, 
a  certain  workman  suggested  to  his  employer  a  device  whereby 
the  employer  added  one  thousand  dollars  annually  to  his  profits, 
and  the  employer  was  magnanimous  enough  to  hand  over  to  the 
author  a  check  for  thirty  dollars.'  Again  some  of  our  capitaHsts 
are  now  offering  to  sell  stock  to  their  employees,  and  are  doing  a 
great  amount  of  welfare  work  for  them  with  a  view  to  securing  a 
more  permanent  tenure  of  service.  At  a  recent  meeting  of 
employment  managers  in  Philadelphia  deep-laid  plans  were  for- 
mulated for  making  the  laborer's  job  more  permanent.  The  fact 
was  brought  out  that  the  hiring  and  firing  of  employees,  due  to 

'  Galloway's  Organization  and  Management,  p.  381. 


586  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

the  shifting  of  labor,  cost  the  manufacturers  of  the  country 
$172,000,000  annually;  and  it  was  proposed  to  reduce  this  labor 
turnover  by  inaugurating  a  highly  paid  employing  executive  to 
winnow  the  grain  from  the  chaff  of  applicants  by  making  the 
conditions  of  the  worker  more  sanitary,  less  wearisome,  and  the 
home  surroundings  more  attractive.  The  fact  was  brought  out 
that  one  company  allowed  its  employees  a  rest  period  of  three  to 
five  minutes  in  every  hour;  that  another  company  allowed  a 
rest  period  in  the  forenoon  at  which  it  reheved  the  fatigue  of  its 
employees  by  selling  them  five  hundred  bottles  of  milk  at  three 
cents  each,  three  crackers  and  a  straw  going  with  each  bottle. 
Finally,  some  of  our  capitalists  have  done  wonders  in  developing 
scientific  efficiency  methods  whereby  laborers  may  greatly  increase 
their  hourly  product  and  daily  wage. 

Strange  to  say,  however,  the  laborers  have  not  appreciated 
these  efforts  of  the  capitalists  in  their  behalf.  They  have  not 
warmed  up  to  the  science  of  intensifying  their  energies,  and, 
indeed,  if  their  efficiency  could  be  multiplied  tenfold  and  their 
wages  in  like  proportion,  they  would  be  just  as  dissatisfied  as 
ever.  Who  ever  heard  of  increased  wages  satisfying  the  working 
classes  ?  Have  not  wages  doubled  in  the  past  century,  and,  in 
some  industries,  since  the  beginning  of  the  world-war  ? 

The  fact  is  that  everything  which  has  been  done  for  the  wage 
class  has  been  in  a  direction  exactly  opposite  to  that  which  leads 
out  of  our  industrial  warfare.  The  wage  class  are  entirely  luke- 
warm on  all  schemes  of  profit-sharing,  scientific  labor  efficiency, 
prizes  for  valuable  innovations,  and  philanthropic  oversight  of 
their  health  and  community  environment.  The  working  people 
feel  an  indifference  or  antagonism  to  these  things  because  they  are 
all  paternalistic  and  reduce  the  worker  more  and  more  to  the 
condition  of  clay  in  the  hands  of  the  potter.  They  offer  him  no 
adequate  expression  of  his  personality,  of  his  instinct  of  self- 
assertion,  no  incentive  to  invest  his  whole  vital  force  in  the 
industry  in  which  he  works,  no  share  in  the  responsibility  of  the 
enterprise  in  which  he  spends  his  life,  and  no  share  in  the  fellow- 
ship which  is  so  inspiring  a  characteristic  of  all  co-operation  among 
men  who  have  the  power  of  initiative. 


INDUSTRIAL  DEMOCRACY  587 

The  problem  of  industrial  reconstruction  is,  therefore,  simply 
this:  to  restore  to  the  laborer  the  liberty  of  self-direction.  As 
every  man  should  have  a  vote  in  the  political  group  to  which  he 
belongs,  so  every  laborer  should  have  a  voice  in  the  conduct  of 
the  industry  in  which  he  works.  As  autocracy  and  paternahsm 
have  been  banished  from  the  political  world,  so  should  they  be 
banished  from  the  industrial  world.  All  incorporated  industries 
should  constitute  a  real  or  approximate  partnership  of  labor  and 
capital. 

It  is  very  gratifying  to  note  that  a  large  group  of  British  capi- 
talists have  a  vision  of  the  inevitable  trend  toward  freedom  and 
initiative  for  the  wage  class,  and  have  formulated  a  program  which 
provides  henceforward  for  a  share  in  the  control  and  responsi- 
bihty  of  every  industry  by  those  who  compose  its  working  force. 
The  details  of  this  program  may  be  found  in  the  Monthly  Labor 
Review,  United  States  Bureau  of  Labor  Statistics,  October,  1918. 
Such  a  program  insures  the  elimination  of  strikes  and  lockouts, 
and  interests  every  employee  in  the  efficiency  of  the  industry  in 
which  he  works.  It  restores  to  him  the  power  of  self-direction, 
and  gives  him  that  sense  of  responsibility  and  fellowship  in  collec- 
tive undertakings  which  aU  free  peoples  should  have  and  without 
which  no  people  can  be  efficient  or  contented.  This  program 
calls  for  nothing  revolutionary  nor  entirely  new.  It  is  susceptible 
of  being  worked  out  in  graduated  stages,  and  is  already  a  success 
in  a  number  of  industries  in  this  country  and  in  England. 

It  remains  to  be  seen  whether  our  modern  capitalists  wiU 
have  the  vision  of  the  coming  democracy  in  industry,  or  whether 
they  will  foregather  to  strengthen  the  old  paternalism  and  devise 
schemes  for  making  the  laborer  more  impotent  and  submissive, 
and  less  full  of  Hfe  and  aspiration.  Shall  we  have  self-direction, 
democracy,  and  fellowship  in  the  industrial  world,  or  shall  we  have 
bolshevism  ?    One  or  the  other  is  coming. 


THE  COMPARATIVE  ROLE  OF  THE  GROUP  CONCEPT 
IN  WARD'S  DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY  AND  CONTEM- 
PORARY AMERICAN  SOCIOLOGY 


WALTER  B.  BODENHAFER 
Washington  University 


Small  approaches  the  study  of  sociology  from  the  methodological 
side.  His  writings  cover  a  period  of  more  than  a  quarter  of  a  cen- 
tury, and  in  themselves  offer  an  opportunity  to  show  the  changes 
in  part  which  have  taken  place  in  sociological  thought  in  that 
period.  His  thinking  is  rare  in  that  it  shows  a  growing  tendency 
and  an  ability  to  assimilate  the  modifying  trends  and  movements 
in  the  general  field.  Since  we  are  not  attempting  to  trace  the  whole 
of  his  system  of  sociology,  we  shall  not  attempt  to  show  those 
changes  which  may  appear,  but  shall  rely  on  the  later  points  of 
view  in  so  far  as  they  bear  upon  the  subject  in  hand.  We  may, 
however,  point  out  an  impression  which  a  reading  of  the  various 
publications  has  left,  and  that  is,  a  growing  emphasis  upon  the 
group  concept  as  a  tool  of  thought  and  explanation.  Not  that  his 
thinking  was  ever  individualistic,  in  the  proper  sense  of  the  term, 
but  that  the  group  concept  has  become  more  sharply  defined  and 
hsis  gradually  assumed  a  more  central  and  commanding  position 
in  his  thinking.  As  will  be  pointed  out  later.  Small's  use  of  the 
organic  concept  in  his  earlier  writings  shows  that  the  facts  of  group 
solidarity  and  social  continuity,  interdependence  and  unity,  were 
in  his  thought  from  the  beginning.  But  the  explicit  use  of  the 
group  concept,  as  such,  and  its  implications  for  sociology  in  par- 
ticular, are  increasingly  apparent  as  one  pursues  a  study  of  the 
writing  in  a  chronological  order.  We  shall  have  some  hesitancy, 
therefore,  in  placing  too  much  reliance  on  exact  statements  in 
General  Sociology  in  so  far  as  this  particular  problem  concerns  us. 
In  other  words,  the  effort  will  be  to  present  Small's  present  views 
in  regard  to  the  group  concept,  rather  than  to  trace  a  historical 
development  of  them.' 

'  Reliance  will  be  placed  to  some  extent  upon  unpublished  lectures  as  recalled  from 
iectur  e  notes  and  conversations. 

5S8 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"    589 

We  may  approach  the  study  of  Small's  use  of  the  group  concept 
by  first  indicating  his  conception  of  the  nature  of  sociology  and  its 
place  among  the  various  social  sciences.  According  to  SmaU, 
sociology  is  one  of  the  variant  techniques  that  have  been  developed 
in  the  "drive  toward  objectivity"  in  the  field  of  social  science. 
It  is  a  natural  outgrowth  of  the  effort  to  see  and  understand  the 
social  life  as  it  actually  is,  rather  than  from  any  abstract  meta- 
physical or  a  priori  standpoint.  He  has  defined  or  described  the 
place  of  sociology  in  various  recent  pubHcations.  These  may  be 
cited  as  the  mature  expression  of  his  thinking  on  the  problem, 
''Sociology  is  that  variety  of  study  of  the  common  subject-matter 
of  social  science  which  trains  attention  primarily  upon  the  forms 
and  processes  of  groups."^  A  little  more  amplified  statement  of 
the  same  thought  is  contained  in  the  following  definition: 

The  sociological  technique  is  that  variant  among  the  social  science  tech- 
niques which  proceeds  from  the  perception  that,  after  allowing  for  their  purely 
physical  relations,  all  human  phenomena  are  functions  not  only  of  persons, 
but  of  persons  whose  personaUty  on  the  one  hand  expresses  itself  in  part  through 
the  formation  of  groups,  and  on  the  other  hand,  is  in  part  produced  through  the 
influence  of  groups.  In  brief,  sociology  is  that  technique  which  approaches 
the  knowledge  of  human  experience  as  a  whole  through  investigation  of  group- 
aspects  of  the  phenomena.* 

The  sociological  technique  is  that  variant  among  the  social  science  tech- 
niques which  proceeds  from  the  perception  that  all  human  phenomena  are 
functions  of  groups.^ 

These  citations  are  suflScient  to  show  that  in  Small's  view,  the 
group  is  the  fundamental  concept  in  constructing  a  sociology.  The 
analysis  of  group  relations  is  the  distinct  contribution  of  sociology. 
This  seems  to  be  the  only  reason  for  its  claim  to  rank  as  one  among 
several  techniques  which  seek  to  arrive  at  knowledge  of  the  social 
process.  It  is  the  one  thing  which  justifies  sociology  and  puts  it 
on  a  par  with  other  social  sciences  or  techniques.'*  In  other  words, 
it  is  the  group  approach  to  the  common  field  of  the  various  social 
techniques,  the  social  process,  which   constitutes  the   reason   for 

»  "Fifty  Years  of  Sociology  in  the  United  States,"  American  Journal  of  Sociology, 
XXI,  825. 

'  Encyclopaedia  Americana,  article  on  "Sociology,"  1919. 
3  Lecture  notes.  *  Ibid. 


590  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

sociology  as  a  method  of  investigation  and  thought.  In  so  far  as 
any  social  science  can  be  said  to  have  a  field,  the  group  is  the  meth- 
odological preserve  of  the  sociologist.  The  aspects  of  experience 
which  come  within  the  range  of  the  sociological  way  of  thinking 
are  "  all  incidents  of  this  universal  group  destiny."  The  sociologist, 
as  such,  is  concerned  only  with  relations  of  men  in  groups  and  the 
results  of  such  relationships.^  His  center  of  attention  is  the  group. 
The  importance  of  the  group  has  not  been  adequately  kept  in 
view  in  the  social  sciences  in  general,  but  both  in  academic  circles 
and  in  popular  opinion  there  is  an  increasing  recognition  of  the 
group.' 

This  emphasis  upon  the  group  concept,  as  the  key  to  the  claims 
of  the  sociologist  for  standing  among  the  social  sciences,  is  one  of 
the  important  contributions  to  fundamental  sociological  concep- 
tions. It  will  be  noted,  of  course,  that  Small's  point  of  view 
involves  a  departure  from  the  extravagant  notions  of  Ward,  Gid- 
dings,  and  Small  himself,  with  most  of  the  other  sociologists  of  two 
decades  ago,  when  the  claim  of  sociology  as  the  master  among  the 
social  sciences  was  more  prevalent  than  it  is  today.  Small  does 
not  leave  his  repudiation  of  the  "master  science"  claim  to  be 
inferred  only;  he  expressly  confesses  that  the  older  conception 
among  sociologists  is  no  longer  adequate : 

Before  we  fully  find  ourselves  in  the  ranks  of  social  science,  we  shall  have 
to  make  very  clear,  first  to  ourselves  and  then  to  others,  that  we  have  a  clue 
to  a  particular  quest,  and  we  shall,  meanwhile,  have  called  in  our  juvenile 
pretension  to  be  the  masters  of  everything  while  we  are  giving  proof  that  we 
can  discover  something.  We  used  to  compare  the  relation  of  general  sociology 
to  the  whole  range  of  human  activities  with  the  relation  of  general  biology 
to  all  the  phenomena  of  organic  life.  Most  of  the  sociologists  at  one  time 
made  assertions  to  that  effect  without  a  suspicion  that  they  were  comical. 
In  fact,  neither  term  of  the  comparison  was  conceived  in  accordance  with  reality. 
Biologists  today  do  not  recognize  a  science  of  general  biology,  except  in  the 
sense  of  co-of>eration  of  many  divisions  of  labor  in  a  field  designated  generally 
as  biology.  No  more  is  there  such  a  possibiUty  as  general  sociology  which  is 
not  a  division  of  labor  upon  a  reality  common  to  all  the  social  sciences.^ 

*  Lecture  notes. 

i  "  Fifty  Years  of  Sociology  in  the  United  States,"  American  Journal  oj  Sociology, 
XXI,  849. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"    591 

We  have  here  expressed  the  point  of  view  which  is  elaborated  at 
great  length  in  Small's  Meaning  of  Social  Science.  We  shall  not 
pursue  farther  the  conception  of  the  division  of  labor  among  the 
social  sciences  and  its  implications  for  social  science  in  general. 
It  is  brought  in  here  for  the  purpose  of  showing  that,  in  Small's 
opinion,  the  older  conception  of  the  place  of  sociology  is  no  longer 
tenable.  In  place  of  that  conception  he  places  his  methodological 
plan  of  the  co-ordinated  techniques  at  work  upon  a  common  object, 
the  social  process.  Among  these  various  methodological  variants 
the  sociological  takes  its  place  by  virtue  of  its  particular  methodo- 
logical tool,  the  group  concept.  This  concept,  then,  in  such  an 
arrangement,  is  of  the  most  fundamental  and  vital  importance  in 
the  whole  of  that  part  of  the  division  of  labor  called  sociology. 
With  this  introductory  survey  in  mind,  we  may  proceed  to  some 
more  particular  parts  of  his  treatment,  showing  the  use  made  of 
the  group  concept. 

Mention  has  been  made  of  the  term  "social  process."  A  study 
of  Small's  use  of  this  concept  confirms  what  was  said  in  the  begin- 
ning, that  the  group  approach  is  not  a  recent  or  sudden  turn  in  his 
thinking.  His  increasing  emphasis  and  clarity  of  expression  of 
the  group  conception  are  but  the  normal  growth  of  a  thought  which 
was  prevalent  in  his  thinking  from  the  beginning.  The  very  con- 
ception of  a  social  process  which  has  played  so  large  a  part  in  his 
thought  and  which,  as  explained  by  him  and  elaborated  by  his 
followers,  forms  a  contribution  to  sociology,  is  an  implication  of  a 
group  conception  of  social  reality.  What  he  has  done  in  later 
years  is  to  make  more  clear  the  implications  and  logical  results  of 
his  earher  central  conception.  In  this  respect  he  has  typified,  as 
well  as  influenced,  the  general  trend  in  sociological  thought.  By 
the  process  conception  he  means  the  opposite  of  Spencer's  static 
conception  of  groups  and  group  relations.  The  process  conception 
emphasizes  a  ceaseless  interaction  in  which  there  is  constant  change 
of  the  group  from  moment  to  moment,  leaving  it  different  from 
time  to  time.  A  process  is  a  ''collection  of  occurrences  each  of 
which  has  a  meaning  for  every  other,  the  whole  of  which  consti- 
tutes some  sort  of  becoming."^    The  social-process  view  emphasizes 

» Lecture  notes. 


592  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

the  ongoing,  changing,  moving  character  of  groups.  It  is  a  dynamic 
view  of  group  relations.  It  emphasizes  the  essentially  group 
nature  of  life  as  an  ongoing  stream.  It  is  this  suggested  and 
implied  conception  of  the  solidarity  of  group  life  that  is  so  impor- 
tant in  all  of  the  more  modern  developments  of  social  science. 

Small's  use  of  the  social-process  category,  connoting  as  it  does 
the  solidarity  of  the  ongoing  human  stream  as  one  of  the  funda- 
mental approaches  to  the  understanding  of  social  life,  suggests 
Comte's  method  which  he  called  the  vue  d'ensemble  as  contrasted 
with  the  atomizing  and  dissecting  method.  The  essence  of  Comte's 
method,  like  Small's,  consists  in  the  habit  of  looking  at  things  not 
in  their  isolation  but  in  their  "together"  both  in  space  and  time. 
Merz  has  characterized  this  method  of  thought  as  one  of  the  most 
significant  achievements  of  the  last  half  of  the  nineteenth  century. 
He  has  given  to  it  the  name  synoptic  method  or  view,  in  contrast 
with  the  process  of  analysis  and  synthesis,  "the  former  taking  in 
at  a  glance  the  totality  of  a  complex  subject,  the  latter  dissecting 
the  same  into  its  parts  and  then  attempting  to  bring  them  together 
again  to  a  united  whole."''  The  tendency  to  look  at  the  problem 
of  social  life  as  a  whole,  as  a  plexus  of  group  relations,  is  so  central 
in  Small's  thought  that  it  may  be  well  worth  while  to  cite  Merz 
again  as  he  applies  the  synoptic  view  to  the  problem  of  society: 

Formerly  all  the  sciences  which  have  to  do  with  this  subject  started  from 
the  study  of  the  individual  organism  or  the  individual  mind,  frequently  dis- 
regarding altogether  the  environment  or  collective  life  of  man,  or  reaching 
this  only  by  slow  and  uncertain  steps.  Latterly,  however,  not  only  has  the 
collective  Hfe  of  man  attracted  more  attention  than  the  ndividual  it  has  become 
rather  the  fashion  to  place  society  in  some  form  or  other  in  the  foreground, 
to  start  with  some  definition  of  the  social  "Together,"  of  the  collective  life  of 
human  beings,  and  to  approach  in  this  way  not  only  the  study  of  humanity 
or  mankind  at  large,  but  also,  through  it,  to  get  a  better  understanding  of  the 
nature  and  hfe  of  the  individual  mind  itself.^ 

Small's  thinking,  from  the  beginning,  displays  this  tendency,  but 
it  has  become  more  explicit  and  detailed  with  his  maturer  thought. 
In  substantiation  of  the  statement  that  the  group  view  has  been 

«  Merz,  History  of  European  Thought  in  the  Nineteenth  Century,  IV,  431. 
» Ibid.,  p.  436. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"    593 

central  from  the  beginning  of  his  writings,  one  might  point  to  the 
use  of  the  organic  concept  which  flourished  in  the  earlier  develop- 
ment of  thought  in  sociology  in  this  country.  Small  has  repudi- 
ated the  organic  theory  in  its  extravagant  forms,  but  he  insists 
that  it  never,  in  the  minds  of  those  who  made  use  of  it,  was  more 
than  a  tool  of  interpretation  with  considerable  limitation.  It  did 
have  this  much  that  was  sound,  the  conception  of  the  interrelated- 
ness  and  unity  of  the  human  stream.  The  kernel  of  truth  in  it 
was  the  thought  which  is  illustrated  in  Merz's  statement  and 
which  is  more  adequately  expressed  in  the  social-process  concept. 
The  starting-point  for  the  view  which  led  to  the  biological  analogy 
was  the  sociological  axiom:  "All  men  are  functions  of  each  other." 
Stripped  of  the  fantastic  verbiage  and  details  of  some  of  its  spon- 
sors, or  imputed  to  it  by  its  critics,  the  biological  analogy  or 
organic  concept  expressed  the  essential  idea  that  **  everything  some- 
how hangs  together  with  everything  else."*  It  is  this  thought, 
which  is  essentially  a  group  conception,  or  group  approach  to  the 
social  problem,  which  one  finds  running  through  all  of  Small's 
writings.     Its  significance  for  our  purpose  is  quite  apparent. 

As  a  corollary  of  the  point  that  has  just  been  discussed,  one  may 
note  the  conception  which  Small  has  of  the  nature  and  place  of 
social  psychology  in  the  recent  development  of  sociological  thought. 
Space  does  not  permit,  nor  does  our  purpose  warrant  us  in  attempt- 
ing even,  to  summarize  his  social  psychology.  What  is  important 
here  is  to  point  out  that  Small  recognizes  in  social  psychology  an 
attempt  to  give  an  adequate  basis,  in  the  analysis  of  group  psy- 
chology, for  the  final  explanation  of  the  social  process.  He  looks 
for  the  solution  in  both  a  functional  and  behavioristic  social 
psychology.'  By  the  general  term  "social  psychology"  he  refers 
to  the  fact  that,  since  the  beginning  of  the  present  century,  soci- 
ologists in  this  country  have  become 

increasingly  attentive  to  the  states  of  mind  which  characterize  people  in  groups, 
and  to  the  connections  between  these  states  of  mind  and  all  the  activities 
which  the  respective  groups  perform.  To  express  it  in  terms  which  seem  most 
convenient  to  some  of  us,  we  are  more  and  more  seeing  our  distinctive  vocation 

»  Small,  General  Sociology,  pp.  74-80. 
'Ibid.,  pp.  637-49. 


594  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

in  trying  to  find  out  what  interests  are  actually  effective  in  the  members  of 
selected  groups,  and  in  what  ways  they  shape  the  group  fortunes.' 

With  the  details  of  his  suggestions  for  the  solution  of  this  important 
work  we  need  not  concern  ourselves  here.  What  is  necessary  is 
to  point  out  that  Small  recognizes  the  essential  group  problem 
which  lies  at  the  heart  of  the  social  process.  To  seek  out  and  dis- 
cover the  essential  process  which  constitutes  the  center  of  the 
group  life  is  for  him  the  task  of  social  psychology.  It  is,  in  short, 
an  application  of  the  group  concept  to  the  study  of  life. 

It  will  be  worth  while  to  consider  some  further  concepts  which 
afford  an  opportunity  for  further  investigation  of  the  use  made  of 
the  group  concept.  First  of  all,  it  will  be  necessary  to  refer  to 
the  concept  group  itself,  in  so  far  as  it  is  recognized  as  one  of  the 
leading  sociological  categories.  Concerning  this  concept,  Small 
says: 

The  fact  of  social  groups  is  so  obvious,  and  it  is  so  significant,  that  the 
concept  has  been  in  constant  use  in  the  foregoing  discussion.  The  term 
"group"  serves  as  a  convenient  sociological  designation  for  any  number  of 
people,  larger  or  smaller,  between  whom  such  relations  are  discovered  that 
they  must  be  thought  of  together.    The  "group"  is  the  most  general  and 

colorless  term  used  in  sociology  for  combinations  of  persons Thus  a 

"group"  for  sociology  is  a  number  of  persons  whose  relations  to  each  other 
are  safficiently  impressive  to  demand  attention.  The  term  is  merely  a  com- 
monplace tool.  It  contains  no  mystery.  It  is  only  a  handle  with  which  to 
grasp  the  innumerable  varieties  of  arrangements  into  which  people  are  drawn 
by  their  variations  of  interest.  The  universal  condition  of  association  may  be 
expressed  in  the  same  commonplace  way;  people  always  live  in  groups,  and  the 
same  persons  are  likely  to  be  members  of  many  groups.* 

With  this  introductory  definition  of  the  term  group,  as  he  under- 
stands it,  we  may  pass  on  in  the  discussion  to  the  general  problem 
of  the  relation  of  the  individual  to  the  group  or  of  the  relation 
between  the  two  concepts,  the  group  and  the  individual.  It  is 
here,  of  course,  that  the  crucial  point  of  view  appears  in  all  our 
investigations. 

'  "Fifty  Years  of  Sociology  in  the  United  States,"  American  Journal  of  Sociology, 
XXI,  817. 

'  General  Sociology,  p.  495. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"    595 

We  may  begin  the  discussion  of  the  problem  with  Small's 
statement  of  the  rival  theories: 

Social  philosophy,  as  hinted  in  the  beginning  of  this  chapter,  has  always 
vibrated  between  theories  of  individuals,  regarded  as  independent,  seK-sufl5cient 
existences,  and  theories  of  society,  regarded  as  an  entity  which  has  its  existence 
either  altogether  independent  of  individuals,  or  at  least  by  and  through  the 
submerging  of  individuals.  Accordingly,  the  question  has  been  debated  from 
time  immemorial:  "Does  society  exist  for  the  individual  or  the  individual  for 
society  ?"  or  more  specifically:  "Does  the  State  exist  for  the  individual  or  the 
individual  for  the  State  ?  "' 

The  fallacy  in  this,  Small  points  out,  is  the  assumption  of  a  dis- 
junctive, exclusive  relation  between  the  two.  Whether  the  soci- 
ologists or  psychologists  have  had  most  to  do  with  pointing  out 
this  fallacy, 

the  formulation  of  life  in  terms  of  activity  has  brought  psychologists  and  sociol- 
ogists to  the  point  of  view  that  individuals  and  societies  are  not  means  to  each 
other,  but  phases  of  each  other.  A  society  is  a  combining  of  the  activities  of 
persons.  A  person  is  a  center  of  conscious  impulses  which  realize  themselves  in 
full  only  in  realizing  a  society. '^ 

With  reference  to  the  discussion  of  Aristotle's  dictum  that  man  is 
a  social  animal,  Small  observes  that  there  is  a  very  important  sense 
in  which  the  dictum  is  one  of  the  primary  sociological  data. 

Man  cannot  be  man  without  acting  and  reacting  with  man.    The  presence 

of  others  is  necessary  in  order  that  I  may  be  myself A  person  .... 

cannot  come  into  physical  existence  except  through  the  co-operation  of  parent 
persons;  he  cannot  become  a  self-sustaining  animal  unless  protected  for  sev- 
eral years  by  other  persons;  and  he  cannot  find  out  and  exercise  his  capabili- 
ties unless  stimulated  to  countless  forms  of  action  by  contact  with  other 
persons.  3 

Human  Hfe,  in  his  view,  is  "always  and  necessarily  social  life;  i.e., 
life  in  groups,  the  members  of  which  influence  each  other. "'»  To 
speak  of  individuals  first  coming  into  existence  and  subsequently 
forming  groups  is  probably  a  distortion  of  the  facts;  "it  is  probably 
nearer  the  truth  to  suppose  that  originally  individuals  were  dif- 
ferentiations of  groups,  than  to  suppose  that  groups  were  synthesis 

*  Ihid.,  pp.  473-74-  *  ■^^• 

» Ihid.,  p.  476.  *  Ihid.,  p.  208. 


596  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

of  individuals."'    "Actual  persons  always  live  and  move  and  have 
their  being  in  groups."' 

Following  Baldwin,  Small  calls  attention  to  the  fact  that  self- 
consciousness  is  a  group  product  rather  than  an  individual  datum. 
He  says: 

Consciousness  in  itself,  or  at  least  self-consciousness,  is  not  an  individual 
but  a  social  phenomenon.  We  do  not  arrive  at  self-consciousness  except  by- 
coming  into  circuit  with  other  persons,  with  whom  we  achieve  awareness  of 
ourselves.  For  sociological  purposes  this  degree  of  refinement  is  unnecessary. 
We  need  to  know  simply  that  persons  do  not  enlarge  and  equip  and  enrich  and 
exercise  their  personality  except  by  maintaining  relations  with  other  persons. 
Even  Robinson  Crusoe  retained  a  one-sided  connection  with  society.  If,  when 
he  walked  out  of  the  surf  to  the  shore,  he  had  left  behind  him  the  mental  habits, 
the  language,  the  ideas  which  he  had  amassed  in  contact  with  other  persons, 
not  enough  available  means  of  correlating  his  actions  would  have  remained  to 
provide  him  with  his  first  meal.^ 

Carrying  this  thought  still  farther  to  some  of  its  implications,  he 
suggests  that  the  category  "individual"  is  inaccurate  as  an  expres- 
sion of  reality.-*  It  is  not  a  tool  of  precision  in  the  sense  indicated 
above:  that  there  is  no  separate  individual  as  implied  in  the  older 
sense  of  the  term.  The  term  is  used  uncritically  in  popular  speech 
and  usually  carries  the  meaning  of  a  separate,  discrete,  unrelated 
entity.s  Such  a  view  is  tending  to  disappear  in  social  science.'^ 
If  sociology  and  psychology  were  to  accept  the  position  usually 
implied  by  the  term  individual  in  its  baldest  sense  they  would  dis- 
appear.7  These  sciences  stress  the  group  as  the  reality  and  the 
individual,  in  the  older  sense,  appears  as  a  fiction.^  This  does  not 
mean,  of  course,  that  sociology  does  not  recognize  the  force  of  per- 
sonality in  social  relations.'  A  personalized  factor  in  the  social 
whole  is  a  reality.  Persons  are  real  though  socially  created;  they 
are  more  important  and  powerful  than  in  the  older  view  which 

^General  Sociology,  p.  218.  'Ibid.,  p.  495. 

*  Ibid.,  p.  476.  It  should  be  noted,  however,  that  Small  does  not  follow  Baldwin 
in  relying  on  imitation  as  the  sole  process  of  self-development.  Chapter  xxxix  pre- 
sents a  very  effective  criticism  of  the  imitation  theory. 

*Ii  General  Sociology  were  to  be  re-written.  Small  would  substitute  "human 
personality"  for  "individual"  as  the  title  of  chapter  xxxii. 

» Lecture  notes.  7  Jbid.  >  jf^j^ 

*Ibid.  ^Ibid. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"    597 

made  them  separate  entities.*  One  of  the  distinct  contributions 
of  modern  sociology  is  to  aid  in  clearing  the  term  ''individual"  of 
the  confusion  with  which  it  has  been  surrounded.  It  is  because 
of  these  confusions  that  Small  suggests  the  value  of  a  substitute 
category  for  the  term  individual.  Among  the  possible  substitutes 
he  suggests  the  tenn  socius?  The  advantages  and  significance  of 
this  term  he  sets  forth  in  the  following  language:  "The  socius  is 
that  literal  factor  within  the  human  whole  which  we  now  find  in 
the  place  occupied  by  that  discredited  hypothesis  the  individual. 
It  is  the  sociological  conception  of  the  term  individual,  freed  from 
former  misconceptions."^ 

Before  leaving  the  discussion  of  this  part  of  the  review,  it  should 
be  pointed  out  that  Small  recognizes  a  division  of  labor  between 
the  sociologist  and  the  psychologist.  That  is,  he  accepts  the 
individual  as  ready-made.  The  making  of  the  individual  is  the 
field  of  study  of  the  psychologist.  It  is  the  function  of  the  psy- 
chologist and  not  of  the  sociologist  to  take  up  this  more  individual 
problem.     The  sociologist  is  primarily  concerned  with  groups: 

In  any  given  inquiry  the  psychologist,  as  such,  takes  association  as  the 
known  and  fixed  factor,  in  order  to  pursue  investigation  of  his  undetermined 
subject-matter — the  mechanism  of  the  individual  actor.  The  sociologist,  as 
such,  on  the  contrary,  takes  the  individual  for  granted,  and  pursues  investi- 
gation of  his  undetermined  subject-matter,  viz.,  associations.* 

In  reply  to  a  criticism  of  his  view  of  the  separation  of  psychology 
and  sociology  in  this  manner,  Small  acknowledges  that  no  hard- 
and-fast  line  can  be  drawn  but  feels  that,  for  purposes  of  division 
of  labor,  the  primary  work  of  accounting  for  the  individual  may 
be  left  to  the  psychologist,  who  is  better  fitted  for  the  work  than 
the  sociologist.^  The  significance  of  the  problem  here  involved 
will  appear  in  the  next  chapter.  In  passing,  it  may  be  observed 
that  to  take  the  individual  for  granted,  as  already  constituted,  as 
the  starting-point  for  sociological  study  is  an  abstraction  which 
has  serious  consequences  both  for  social  theory  and  social  control. 

'  Following  the  suggestion  of  Baldwin  and  Giddings. 

J  Lecture  notes. 

*  General  Sociology,  p.  447.  ^Ibid. 


598  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

In  other  words,  it  would  seem  that  there  can  be  no  valid  sociology 
unless  based  on  a  valid  social  psychology,  and  thus  far  the  psycholo- 
gists have  not  as  a  whole  presented  that  valid  basis.  One  of  the 
implications  of  the  group  concept  is,  as  Small  himself  points  out, 
the  impossibility  of  making  a  valid  separation  of  the  individual 
from  the  group  or  vice  versa. 

In  connection  with  the  criticism  referred  to,  it  may  be  noted 
that  Small's  discussion  of  interests  as  the  ultimate  sociological 
terms  of  calculation  presents  a  possible  opening  for  attack  in  its 
failure  to  use  fully  the  group  concept,  which  forms  such  a  large 
part  of  his  thinking.  We  cannot  hope  to  go  into  the  discussion  of 
interests  in  any  detail.  Following  Ratzenhofer's  suggestion.  Small 
makes  interests  the  basis  of  his  General  Sociology.  Around  the 
concept  "interests"  he  builds  up  his  social  psychology  as  a  basis 
for  his  sociological  argument.  The  relation  of  the  interests  to 
groups  is  clearly  set  forth.  The  concepts  ''group"  and  "interests" 
form  the  center  of  his  system.  With  the  psychology  of  interests, 
and  the  use  of  the  concept  in  social  analysis,  we  are  not  concerned. 
What  is  important  to  point  out  at  this  place  is,  that  the  assumption 
of  the  priority  of  interests  leaves  an  impression  that  the  place  of 
the  group  in  the  formation  of  interests  has  not  been  adequately 
stressed.  In  other  words,  the  group  concept  has  not  served  as 
well  as  it  might.  The  argument  implies,  of  course,  that  the  group 
must  be  brought  in  to  explain  the  interests,  but  the  total  impres- 
sion is  one  of  undue  emphasis  on  the  interests,  rather  than  on  the 
group's  place  in  the  formation  of  the  interests.  The  point  may  be 
illustrated  by  citing  the  criticism  made  against  economic  theory  in 
its  treatment  of  the  problem  of  value.  As  Cooley  and  Anderson 
and  others  have  pointed  out,  the  fundamental  error  in  the  theory 
of  value  has  been  in  the  assumption  of  certain  wants  as  the  starting- 
points  for  discussion  and  then  building  up  a  theory  of  the  market 
and  its  values  upon  the  basis  of  these  assumed  prior  wants. ^  To  do 
so  leaves  out  the  very  important  fact  that  the  market  creates  the 
wants  as  much  as  it  is  created  by  them.'    So  in  the  case  of  interests, 

'  Cooley,  Social  Process;  Anderson,  Social  Value. 

'  The  thought  is  expressed  in  the  inverted  statement  of  an  old  saying,  "Invention 
is  the  mother  of  necessity." 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  ''DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY''    599 

we  cannot  start  with  these  initial  assumptions  and  neglect  the  fact 
that  the  group  itself  creates  the  interests  as  well  as  it  is  created 
by  them.  The  process  is  a  reciprocal  one  and  the  group  approach 
to  it  is  as  essential  at  least  as  the  interest  approach.  Interests  are 
group  products  as  well  as  group  creators.  In  analyzing  the  social 
process  the  group  concept  is  as  fundamental  as  interests. 

Two  very  important  illustrations  of  the  use  of  the  group  con- 
cept remain  to  be  pointed  out,  namely,  the  ethical  problem  and  the 
application  of  the  group  concept  to  property  relations.  With 
reference  to  the  first  of  these  problems  we  may  note,  first  of  all, 
that  Small  places  the  ethical  problem  as  the  final  one  in  a  com- 
plete sociological  study.  For  the  solution  of  the  ethical  problem 
sociology  is  fundamental.  There  can  be  no  valid  ethical  prin- 
ciples or  ethical  criteria  except  those  furnished  by  a  valid  sociology. 
"Every  ethical  judgment  with  an  actual  content  has  at  least 
tacitly  presupposed  a  sociology.  Every  individual  or  social  esti- 
mate of  good  and  bad,  of  right  and  wrong,  current  today  assumes 
a  sociology.  No  code  of  morals  can  be  adopted  in  the  future  with- 
out implying  a  sociology  as  part  of  its  premises."*  In  place  of  an 
individualistic  treatment  of  the  problem,  sociology  must  furnish  a 
process  conception  as  the  basis  for  a  valid  ethical  structure.  This 
implies  that  both  the  codes  and  the  criteria  are  social.  They  are 
results  of  social  situations.  "That  is  good,  for  me  or  for  the  world 
around  me,  which  promotes  the  on-going  of  the  social  process. 
That  is  bad,  for  me  or  for  the  world  around  me,  which  retards  the 
on-going  of  the  social  process."^  This  is  the  nearest  we  can  get  to 
an  absolute  system  of  ethics.  It  involves  a  shifting  code  and  shift- 
ing criteria-contents,  but  it  becomes  more  and  more  stable  and 
refined  as  human  experience  evolves.  The  absolute  system  of 
ethics  must  give  way  to  a  functional  conception;  the  static  sys- 
tems must  give  way  to  a  process  conception : 

At  all  events  the  net  result  of  psychological  and  sociological  analysis  for 
ethical  purposes  up  to  date  is  a  certain  quantum  of  detail  in  specification  of 
this  insight  that  the  main  situation  is  incessant  movement,  having  no  quality 
of  rest,  but  consisting  of  a  constant  process,  not  in  a  straight  line,  but,  taking 

*  General  Sociology,  p.  633. 
'  Ibid.,  p.  676. 


6oo  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

large  periods  of  time  into  the  field  of  view,  consistently  toward  something 
more  of  the  process,  which  to  our  ken  is  interminable.' 

On  the  whole,  then,  we  may  summarize  Small's  position  by  defining 
it  as  an  effort  to  substitute  a  pragmatic  social  theory  of  ethics  for 
the  discarded  metaphysical,  individualistic  systems  of  Kant  and 
his  followers.  It  is  a  logical  application  of  the  conception  of  life 
which  has  the  group  as  its  way  of  approach. 
'  General  Sociology,  p.  689. 

[To  he  continued] 


EDUCATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK 


JESSE  F.  STEINER 
Director  of  Educational  Service,  American  Red  Cross,  Washington,  D.C. 


V.      THE   CASE   METHOD   OF   INSTRUCTION 

The  case  method  of  instruction  as  it  has  been  developed  espe- 
cially in  schools  of  law  and  social  work  stands  out  as  an  important 
contribution  to  methods  of  professional  education.  The  case 
method  considered  in  its  broadest  sense  is  of  course  by  no  means 
limited  to  these  two  fields.  Its  underlying  principles  have  long 
been  the  dominant  factor  in  all  scientific  instruction.  It  is,  in  fact, 
simply  the  method  of  science  which  begins  with  the  concrete  fact 
instead  of  the  general  principle.  In  the  field  of  the  natural  sciences, 
no  other  method  would  now  be  given  serious  consideration.  With- 
out the  laboratory  and  the  microscope  and  an  opportunity  for 
patient  study  of  specimens  and  cases,  the  work  of  the  scientist  could 
not  be  successfully  done.  In  the  social  sciences  also,  this  inductive 
method  of  instruction  has  come  to  be  regarded  as  a  matter  of  course. 
There  must  first  be  the  careful  study  of  actual  facts  and  conditions 
before  generalization  can  begin.  In  this  sense  the  case  method  is 
nothing  more  or  less  than  the  method  of  induction  and  as  such  takes 
its  place  in  the  wider  movement  of  educational  reform  which  in 
recent  years  has  been  so  rapidly  overthrowing  traditional  methods 
of  instruction. 

But  in  the  more  specific  meaning  of  this  term  the  case  method 
appHes  more  particularly  to  the  type  of  instruction  most  common  in 
schools  of  law  and  social  work  where  the  point  of  departure  and  the 
chief  content  of  the  course  consist  in  the  study  and  analysis  of  sep- 
arate cases.  Its  origin  as  far  as  law  schools  are  concerned  goes  back 
to  the  Harvard  Law  School  in  1871,  when  Langdell  threw  aside  the 
traditional  textbooks  and  endeavored  to  teach  the  principles  of  law 
through  a  study  of  selected  cases.  This  method,  which  at  the  time 
seemed  so  revolutionary,  was  based  on  the  conviction  that  law  is  a 
science  with  its  own  data  and  body  of  experience  which  must  be 

6oi 


6o2  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

studied  as  we  do  the  material  of  any  other  science  as  it  develops  in 
concrete  situations.  In  Langdell's  opinion  the  student  could  be 
given  a  more  systematic  view  of  the  principles  of  law  and  a  clearer 
comprehension  of  their  historical  development  by  a  study  of  cases, 
carefully  selected  and  arranged,  than  by  the  customary  deductive 
study  of  the  principles  themselves.  The  central  feature  of  this 
method  of  instruction  in  law  is  the  analysis  of  separate  cases  by  the 
students  for  the  purpose  of  disentangling  the  facts  and  bringing  out 
the  point  of  law  involved.  This  task,  whether  performed  inde- 
pendently by  the  students  or  carried  out  under  the  guidance  of  the 
teacher  in  classroom  discussion,  results  not  merely  in  giving  a 
practical  knowledge  of  law  but  trains  the  mind  in  methods  of  legal 
thinking. 

The  success  of  the  case  method  of  teaching  law  can  be  judged 
by  the  fact  that  it  has  become  the  general  mode  of  instruction  in 
the  more  prominent  law  schools  in  this  country.  It  is  indeed  largely 
due  to  this  method  of  instruction  that  the  study  of  law  in  American 
universities  has  been  placed  upon  a  scientific  basis  comparable  to 
that  of  other  important  fields  of  professional  education. 

In  the  schools  of  social  work  the  case  method  is  less  widely 
known  but  is  of  equal  importance.  Its  use  in  this  field  has  been 
largely  in  connection  with  the  teaching  of  the  technique  of  case 
work.  The  apprentice  in  a  case-work  agency  receives  his  first 
initiation  to  his  duties  through  a  study  and  analysis  of  case  records 
taken  from  the  files  of  the  organization  employing  him.  This  study 
under  the  direction  of  a  competent  district  secretary  or  supervisor 
and  accompanied  by  actual  work  in  the  field  under  supervision  has 
long  been  the  central  feature  of  the  apprenticeship  system  of  train- 
ing in  this  type  of  social  work. 

The  case  method  of  instruction  in  schools  of  social  work  follows 
essentially  the  same  lines.  Carefully  selected  case  histories  rather 
than  textbooks  are  relied  upon  for  teaching  material.  The  in- 
structor of  case  work  usually  selects  and  edits  or  secures  from  some 
outside  source  a  few  records  suitable  for  teaching  purposes  and 
builds  up  his  course  around  a  class  discussion  of  the  facts  contained 
in  these  records  and  the  points  of  technique  illustrated  by  them. 
These  records  are  not  usually  placed  in  the  hands  of  the  students, 


EDUCATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK  603 

at  least  in  the  beginning  of  the  course  of  study.  A  common  method 
is  for  the  instructor  to  read  them,  paragraph  by  paragraph,  in  the 
classroom  for  the  purpose  of  enabling  the  students  to  reconstruct 
in  imagination  the  actual  situation  faced  by  the  worker  who  handled 
the  case  and  then  decide  between  the  alternative  courses  of  action 
that  present  themselves  at  critical  points  of  the  record.  By  thus 
living  through,  as  it  were,  the  experience  of  the  case  worker  and 
step  by  step  working  out  the  proper  procedure  to  be  followed,  the 
student  not  only  becomes  famiHar  with  the  technique  of  case  work, 
but  obtains  a  real  knowledge  of  the  nature  of  social  problems  and 
of  the  social  forces  in  the  community  that  may  be  utilized  in  work- 
ing out  their  solution. 

The  advantages  of  this  method  over  that  of  a  general  discussion 
of  social  problems  are  obvious.  The  stu'dent  who  has  thought 
through  the  experiences  of  a  worker  in  his  efforts  over  a  period  of 
months  or  years  to  re-establish  a  dependent  family  has  an  intimate 
insight  into  the  problems  of  dependency  that  could  not  be  obtained 
by  any  amount  of  general  reading.  When  this  class  discussion  of  a 
case  record  under  the  guidance  of  a  competent  instructor  is  supple- 
mented by  a  sufl&cient  amount  of  field  work  to  give  the  student 
actual  experience  in  dealing  with  the  problems  under  discussion  in 
the  classroom,  it  is  difl&cult  to  conceive  of  a  method  of  instruction 
better  adapted  to  the  needs  of  students  preparing  for  professional 
work  in  this  field. 

One  of  the  problems  in  the  successful  use  of  this  method  of  in- 
struction is  that  of  securing  the  proper  kind  of  teaching  material. 
Case  records,  as  has  already  been  pointed  out  by  Porter  R.  Lee,^ 
have  been  prepared  by  organizations  for  their  own  use  and  not  with 
the  needs  of  students  in  mind.  Their  chief  concern  is  with  the  actual 
steps  that  were  taken  and  the  results  secured,  whereas  the  student 
is  interested  primarily  in  how  a  particular  course  of  action  was  de- 
cided upon  and  why  it  was  chosen  in  preference  to  other  alternatives. 
This  calls  for  an  analysis  of  the  processes  involved  in  handling  the 
case  which  cannot  easily  be  done  because  of  the  lack  of  sufficient 
data  of  the  right  kind  in  the  record  itself.     Instructors  using  the 

1  "Preparation  of  Teaching  Material,"  New  Orleans  Conference  of  Social  Work, 
1920. 


6o4  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

case  method  sometimes  overcome  this  difficulty  by  depending  upon 
case  records  with  which  they  have  personal  knowledge.  Another 
plan  is  to  secure  the  needed  data  through  a  personal  conference  with 
the  person  who  handled  the  case  and  wrote  the  record. 

As  long,  however,  as  lack  of  teaching  material  compels  each 
instructor  to  be  responsible  for  finding  and  editing  the  case  records 
for  his  own  use,  the  case  method  of  instruction  in  social  work  must 
be  regarded  as  far  behind  the  achievements  of  the  case  method  in 
law  which  for  many  years  has  had  available  a  large  number  of  care- 
fully selected  and  well-edited  cases.  If  the  case  method  of  teaching 
social  work  is  to  occupy  its  proper  place  as  a  method  of  professional 
education,  it  is  of  the  utmost  importance  that  teaching  material  of 
the  right  kind  be  made  easily  accessible. 

Until  very  recently  little  attention  had  been  paid  to  the  prep- 
aration of  teaching  records  for  general  use.  One  of  the  first  and 
most  significant  attempts  to  meet  this  need  was  made  by  Miss 
Mary  E.  Richmond  of  the  Charity  Organization  Department  of  the 
Russell  Sage  Foundation.  The  records  prepared  under  her  direc- 
tion were  edited  with  great  care  and  have  proved  invaluable  to 
schools  of  social  work  and  to  supervisors  of  case  work  in  charity 
organization  societies.  It  is  unfortunate  that  the  records  issued 
under  these  auspices  have  been  few  in  number  and  that  the  re- 
strictions placed  upon  their  circulation  have  made  them  available 
to  only  a  limited  circle. 

Another  effort  to  supply  this  teaching  material  is  being  made  by 
the  American  Red  Cross.  In  order  to  provide  case  records  suitable 
for  use  in  its  training  courses,  it  has  undertaken  the  preparation  of 
a  series  of  records  designed  to  illustrate  the  most  typical  problems 
met  with  in  dealing  with  disadvantaged  individuals  and  famihes. 
Records  are  being  secured  from  small  towns  and  rural  communities 
as  well  as  from  large  cities  and  as  far  as  possible  from  all  sections 
of  the  country  so  that  they  may  be  fairly  representative  of  general 
social  conditions.  A  new  feature  of  these  records  is  the  inclusion 
of  all  notes  and  suggestions  for  the  teacher  in  a  separate  teacher's 
manual.  In  this  manual  the  various  steps  taken  in  handling  the 
case  are  analyzed  and  every  effort  is  made  to  supply  the  data  that 
would  be  of  use  to  the  teacher  in  classroom  work. 


EDUCATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK  605 

The  great  need  of  teaching  material  of  this  kind  would  seem 
to  justify  the  preparation  of  case  books  in  social  work  that  would 
be  comparable  to  those  that  have  been  prepared  for  the  use  of  law 
schools.  There  should  be  included  in  these  case  books  not  only 
the  customary  type  of  record  designed  chiefly  for  use  in  teaching 
the  technique  of  case  work;  there  should  also  be  case  histories 
intended  to  illustrate  types  of  problems  and  results  of  treatment. 
Teachers  of  social  work  could  very  profitably  use  case  records 
patterned  somewhat  after  medical  case  histories,  that  give  briefly 
the  facts  of  diagnosis  and  treatment;  or  legal  case  records,  that  are 
used  to  illustrate  principles  of  law  rather  than  methods  of  legal 
procedure.  Social  case  records  of  this  kind  may  very  well  take 
the  form  of  a  summary  of  the  history  of  the  case.  The  essential 
thing  is  to  have  the  facts  stated  in  sufficient  detail  to  give  the  stu- 
dent a  clear  understanding  of  the  problem  in  its  relation  to  the 
particular  situation  in  which  it  occurs.  Sufficient  attention  has 
not  yet  been  given  to  the  teaching  value  of  such  case  summaries. 
Instructors  usually  rely  upon  detailed  chronological  records, 
one  of  which  may  be  made  the  subject  of  class  discussion  for 
a  considerable  period  of  time.  One  of  the  dangers  in  a  prolonged 
study  of  a  few  cases  is  that  students  may  come  to  look  upon 
them  as  pointing  out  the  definite  way  in  which  particular  problems 
should  be  handled.  This  danger  could  be  largely  overcome  if  a 
study  of  a  detailed  record  dealing  for  example  with  the  problem 
of  desertion  could  be  followed  by  a  brief  discussion  of  a  number  of 
case  summaries  illustrating  the  varied  forms  this  problem  assumed 
under  different  situations,  and  the  kind  of  treatment  given.  It 
would  be  hard  to  find  a  better  way  in  which  to  give  the  student 
a  comprehensive  grasp  of  the  complex  and  ever-changing  factors 
involved  in  social  work. 

Another  type  of  case  record  for  which  there  is  a  real  need  is  that 
which  would  embody  the  experiences  of  those  actively  engaged  in 
the  various  aspects  of  community  organization.  It  is  becoming 
increasingly  evident  that  social  workers  must  understand  the  tech- 
nique of  dealing  with  communities  as  well  as  with  individuals  and 
famihes.  The  adjustment  of  the  social  forces  of  a  community  so 
that  the  largest  possible  contribution  will  be  made  to  the  welfare 


6o6  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

of  all  its  members  is  a  task  which  requires  the  services  of  a  skilled 
leader.  If  training  for  this  kind  of  community  work  is  to  be  carried 
on  effectively  it  ought  to  be  possible  to  profit  by  the  experience  of 
community  workers  just  as  the  experiences  of  case  workers  have 
been  made  use  of  in  training  for  family  work.  Community  case 
records  (if  we  may  use  that  term)  should  be  as  valuable  in  a 
course  in  community  organization  as  are  family  case  records  in 
a  course  in  methods  of  family  case  work.  But  here,  also,  the  com- 
munity record  to  be  of  real  value  for  instruction  in  technique  must 
be  more  than  a  chronological  statement  of  work  undertaken  and 
results  secured;  it  must  analyze  the  steps  that  were  taken  at  sig- 
nificant stages  of  the  community  work  and  indicate  why  any  par- 
ticular course  has  been  chosen  in  preference  to  another.  The 
underlying  and  not  always  easily  recognized  factors  that  deter- 
mined the  Hne  of  action  must  be  given  due  attention.  The  usual 
type  of  survey  report  contains  the  information  necessary  to  give  a 
picture  of  the  conditions  that  were  studied  but  it  throws  only  inci- 
dental light  on  the  processes  involved  in  making  the  survey.  The 
student  of  social  conditions  is  satisfied  with  the  report  if  facts  are 
secured ;  the  student  learning  how  to  make  a  survey  must  have  a 
supplemental  statement  dealing  with  the  machinery  that  was  used 
in  getting  the  facts  and  preparing  them  for  presentation.  In  a  simi- 
lar manner  the  student  of  the  technique  of  community  organization 
is  interested  not  merely  in  the  fact  that  a  certain  agency  was 
established  in  a  community;  he  wants  to  know  why  this  agency  in 
preference  to  any  other  was  decided  upon  and  the  different  steps 
by  which  its  organization  was  accomplished. 

The  great  difficulty  at  the  present  time  is  that  few  community 
records  of  this  kind  have  been  prepared  and  as  a  consequence  it 
is  not  possible  to  compare  methods  and  determine  whether  the 
technique  in  this  field  can  be  standardized  as  it  has  been  in  other 
lines  of  social  work.  Until  more  progress  has  been  made  in  securing 
this  type  of  community  record,  teaching  material  for  courses  in 
the  technique  of  community  organization  must  be  regarded  as 
entirely  inadequate. 

The  case  method  of  instruction  in  social  work  is  pedagogically 
sound,  and  when  a  proper  amount  of  teaching  material  is  made 


EDUCATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK  607 

available  it  will  doubtless  come  into  still  wider  use.  There  is  now  a 
tendency  in  some  schools  of  social  work  to  demand  a  great  deal  of 
class  discussion  of  different  types  of  case  records  before  permitting 
the  students  to  engage  in  any  field  work  except  that  of  the  simplest 
type.  While  this  method  of  instruction  can  never  take  the  place 
of  field  work,  it  may  be  possible  when  a  sufficient  amount  of 
teaching  material  is  available  to  have  the  study  and  discussion 
of  written  records  supplement  in  a  much  larger  way  than  is  now 
customary  the  actual  work  of  the  students  in  the  field. 

VI.      THE  PLACE  OF  FIELD  WORK  IN  THE  COURSE  OF  STUDY 

Education  for  social  work,  unlike  engineering  and  medical 
education,  has  never  passed  through  a  didactic  stage  of  instruction 
with  chief  emphasis  upon  theoretical  studies.  On  the  contrary, 
as  might  be  expected  in  training  schools  that  developed  out  of  the 
apprentice  system,  field-work  training  has  always  been  given  a 
prominent  place  in  the  curriculum. 

Because  of  the  close  relationship  between  the  first  schools  of 
social  work  and  the  social  agencies,  the  latter  as  a  matter  of  course 
assumed  responsibihty  for  the  field  work  of  the  students.  While 
this  plan  involved  the  delegation  of  an  important  part  of  the 
instruction  to  persons  not  directly  under  control  of  the  school  it 
was  felt  that  this  was  the  most  practical  way  of  providing  this 
training.  Experience  soon  demonstrated,  however,  that  field  work 
carried  on  in  this  way  could  with  great  difficulty  be  made  an 
integral  part  of  the  course.  Too  often  it  tended  to  become  a 
kind  of  extra-mural  requirement  dominated  more  by  the  condi- 
tions existing  in  the  agency  than  by  the  ideals  of  the  school.  The 
pressure  of  the  work  in  the  agency,  coupled  with  the  fact  that  those 
actually  in  charge  of  the  practice  work  of  the  students  were  not 
always  skilled  or  interested  in  teaching,  frequently  caused  the 
students'  practice  to  be  hmited  to  meaningless  errand-running 
or  to  other  detached  tasks  of  very  Httle  educational  value. 

The  existence  of  this  difficulty  has  long  been  recognized  and 
many  efforts  have  been  made  to  find  a  satisfactory  solution.  In 
some  cases,  the  social  agencies  that  have  been  co-operating  with 
schools  of  social  work  set  aside  teaching  districts  in  which  they 


6o8  TEE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

make  an  effort  to  have  workers  specially  qualified  to  supervise 
the  field  work  of  the  students.  The  schools  of  social  work  on 
their  part  frequently  give  the  field-work  supervisors  a  nominal 
position  on  their  faculty  and  by  periodical  conferences  with  these 
supervisors  endeavor  to  bring  about  the  proper  correlation  of  the 
practical  work  with  classroom  instruction.  In  many  instances 
the  relationship  between  the  schools  of  social  work  and  the  social 
agencies  has  been  so  close  and  cordial  that  the  problem  has  been 
much  simpUfied.  The  results  attained  by  the  schools  of  social 
work  indicate  that  this  traditional  method  of  providing  field- 
work  training  has  in  a  considerable  degree  been  successful.  What- 
ever its  failures,  they  have  not  been  due  to  any  lack  of  appreciation 
of  educational  ideals  on  the  part  of  the  executive  heads  of  the 
social  agencies.  The  chief  difficulty  has  been  to  find  members 
of  their  staff  that  have  teaching  ability  and  to  arrange  their  work 
in  such  a  way  that  they  would  have  sufficient  time  to  give  careful 
supervision  to  the  students. 

This  problem  of  the  proper  measure  of  control  over  field-work 
facilities  is  by  no  means  peculiar  to  schools  of  social  work.  It  is  a 
fundamental  problem  in  the  whole  field  of  professional  education 
and  has  been  met  by  the  professional  schools  in  different  ways.  In 
the  field  of  medical  education  it  is  generally  agreed  that  cHnical 
experience  cannot  be  provided  in  the  most  satisfactory  way  by  a 
hospital  or  dispensary  that  is  entirely  detached  from  the  medical 
school.  If  the  hospital  has  the  right  to  limit  the  wards  or  the  types 
of  cases  to  which  the  students  may  have  access,  or  to  determine  the 
hours  when  cHnical  instruction  may  be  given,  or  to  set  up  any  other 
restrictions  that  would  interfere  with  a  sound  teaching  poHcy,  the 
medical  school  cannot  build  up  a  well-balanced  curriculum  that 
will  meet  the  needs  of  the  students.  Experience  has  demonstrated 
that  the  school  should  have  educational  control  of  its  clinical 
facilities,  a  control  that  involves  not  only  the  decision  about 
teaching  arrangements  in  the  hospital,  but  the  power  to  appoint 
the  hospital  staff. 

Engineering  schools,  on  the  other  hand,  are  finding  it  imprac- 
ticable to  depend  upon  their  own  schools  for  the  practice  work  of 
their  students.     With  their  limited  equipment  it  is  impossible  to 


EDUCATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK  609 

duplicate  the  varied  processes  carried  on  in  industry  and  familiarize 
the  students  with  actual  working  conditions.     To  instal  and  keep 
up-to-date  the  vast  and  compUcated  machinery  of  the  engineering 
worid  and  develop  shops  that  would  approximate  the  conditions 
as  they  exist  in  the  varied  Hnes  of  industry  would  mean  a  tremen- 
dous expense.     The  solution  of  their  field-work  problem  that  seems 
to  be  most  successful  is  the  so-called  co-operative  plan  which  sends 
the  students  into  industrial  plants  on  a  paid  basis  for  their  prac- 
tical   work.     This    shopwork    which    alternates   with    classroom 
instruction  is  carefully  graded  and  plaimed  so  as  to  fit  into  the 
curriculum,  but  it  is  real  work  that  is  not  only  of  value  to  the 
students  but  to  their  employers  as  well.  In  order  to  make  sure  that 
the  shopwork  assigned  to  the  students  is  being  done  in  a  way  that 
would  have  educational  value,  shop  co-ordinators  are  sent  by  the 
school  to  the  shop  where  they  inspect  the  work  of  the  students  and 
confer  with  those  in  charge  of  their  work.     The  industrial  world 
thus  becomes  the  students'  laboratory  while  the  school  assumes  the 
function  of  interpreting  this  practical  experience  in  terms  of  the 
theories  and  principles  that  underKe  successful  engineering  practice. 
Schools  of  law  have  never  seriously  grappled  with  the  problem 
of   field-work   training.     Their   course   of   study   is   intended    to 
acquaint  students  with  the  principles  of  law  rather  than  with  the 
technique  of  legal  practice.     Some  attention  is  given  to  the  latter 
in  the  moot  courts  common  in  some  law  schools,  and  law  students 
are  sometimes  encouraged  to  get  practice  work  with  legal-aid 
societies  or  in  law  offices,  but  in  general  the  acquirement  of  skill  in 
the  practice  of  law  is  regarded  as  something  that  should  follow 
instead  of  form  a  part  of  the  law  course. 

In  the  training  of  teachers,  opportunities  for  students  to  teach 
under  supervision  have  come  to  be  regarded  as  a  necessity.  In 
some  cases  this  is  carried  on  by  special  arrangements  with  the 
pubHc  schools  where  the  students  have  the  advantage  of  famiHar- 
izing  themselves  with  the  routine  of  the  schoolroom  under  actual 
working  conditions.  Another  plan  usually  preferred  by  profes- 
sional schools  of  education  is  to  have  these  practice  schools  under 
the  direct  control  of  those  responsible  for  the  training  of  the 
teachers.     It  is  very  evident  that  this  gives  greater  freedom  in 


6io  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

working  out  experimental  methods  and  makes  it  possible  to  have 
the  proper  control  over  those  who  supervise  the  practice  work. 

The  experience,  therefore,  of  professional  schools  in  providing 
practical  training  facilities  for  their  students  has  by  no  means 
followed  the  same  lines.  The  administrative  problems  vary  with 
the  type  of  field  work  to  such  an  extent  that  it  may  never  be 
possible  to  work  out  uniform  methods  of  procedure  that  would  be 
applicable  to  all  professional  schools. 

The  important  thing  as  far  as  schools  of  social  work  are  con- 
cerned, is  to  keep  clearly  in  mind  the  educational  requirements  of 
field-work  training  and  then  recognize  that  methods  of  fulfilling 
these  requirements  must  be  determined  by  local  conditions  and 
circumstances.  The  minimum  requirements  of  field  work  stand 
out  clearly  in  the  definition  formulated  by  the  Committee  on  Field 
Work  of  the  Association  of  Urban  Universities  at  the  annual  meeting 
of  this  Association  in  New  York  in  1917.  According  to  this  com- 
mittee, field  work  "includes  the  activities  of  students  in  the  perform- 
ance of  tasks  of  everyday  life  under  actual  conditions  which  may 
be  accepted  and  directly  related  to  concurrent  class  work."  The 
two  most  fundamental  things  that  determine  the  educational  value 
of  field  work  are  the  participation  in  tasks  under  actual  working 
conditions  and  the  proper  correlation  of  these  tasks  so  that  they  fit 
into  a  systematic  course  of  training.  It  is  conceivable  that  these 
two  requirements  may  be  met  by  different  methods  of  field-work 
administration.  There  is  no  inherent  reason  why  a  social  agency 
that  has  been  requested  to  furnish  field-work  training  for  students 
should  not  do  this  in  a  satisfactory  manner.  The  acceptance  of 
such  responsibiUty  is  by  no  means  incompatible  with  a  sound  admin- 
istration of  their  work.  As  a  matter  of  fact  the  giving  of  such 
training  must  be  regarded  as  one  of  the  regular  duties  of  a  well- 
equipped  organization.  If  their  personnel  is  sufficient  and  willing  to 
co-operate  with  the  school,  students  working  under  their  direction 
ought  to  receive  training  of  high  quality. 

On  the  other  hand  it  should  be  possible  for  the  schools  of  social 
work  to  build  up  training  facilities  under  their  own  management 
and  direction.  A  school  properly  equipped  with  field-work  super- 
visors might  very  well  choose  suitably  located  communities  where 


EDUCA  TION  FOR  SOCIA L  WORK  6 1 1 

some  phase  of  social  work  was  needed  and  develop  in  those  com- 
munities activities  in  which  the  students  could  participate.  The 
university  schools  of  social  work  that  are  located  in  places  where 
social  agencies  of  high  grade  do  not  exist  may  find  that  the  estab- 
lishment of  these  training  centers  is  the  best  method  of  providing 
certain  kinds  of  field  work  for  their  students.  Under  the  direction 
of  a  field-work  supervisor  a  small  group  of  students  could  make  the 
first  beginning  of  a  training  center  in  an  unorganized  community 
by  making  a  study  of  its  social  needs  and  resources  preparatory  to 
a  determination  of  the  program  of  work  that  is  to  be  undertaken. 
The  different  projects  determined  upon  would  then  furnish  training 
opportunities  for  succeeding  classes  working  under  the  field  super- 
visor who  would  accept  responsibility  for  the  work  that  was  done. 
In  order  to  avoid  the  gaps  in  the  work  caused  by  school  vacations 
and  to  give  the  field  supervisor  necessary  assistance  in  training  the 
students,  graduate  fellowships  could  be  provided  which  would  carry 
with  them  the  obligation  to  serve  as  assistants  in  the  training 
center.  It  is  probable  that  as  this  community  work  develops  and 
the  interest  of  the  people  is  aroused  the  time  will  come  when  the 
community  will  desire  to  carry  on  its  activities  independent  of 
the  university.  When  this  occurs,  the  university  will  have  lost 
control  of  its  training  center,  but  will  have  available  a  social  agency 
which  will  still  offer  opportunities  to  students  for  practice  work. 

Such  university  training  centers  would  only  in  exceptional 
instances  provide  all  the  field-work  training  of  students.  In 
order  to  provide  a  well-rounded  training  the  schools  of  social  work 
ought  to  make  it  possible  for  students  to  familiarize  themselves 
with  the  work  of  the  best-equipped  social  agencies  both  public 
and  private.  The  various  social  agencies  would  still  be  needed 
by  the  school,  but  they  could  be  used  as  supplementary  to  the 
university  training  center.  Much  of  the  prehminary  and  funda- 
mental training  could  be  given  by  the  school  directly  under  its 
own  auspices,  while  the  different  agencies  would  still  be  called 
upon  to  provide  students  with  experience  in  specific  types  of  work. 

At  the  present  time  the  development  of  these  training  centers 
under  the  direction  of  schools  of  social  work  is  still  in  the 
experimental  stage.      The   experience  of   the  Red   Cross   in  its 


112  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

home-service  institutes  during  and  especially  since  the  war  is  a 
good  example  of  one  of  the  attempts  that  has  been  made  to  give 
the  school  control  over  its  field-work  training.  In  several  of  the 
institutes  held  in  the  largest  cities  the  home-service  section  pro- 
vided the  institute  supervisors  with  a  separate  office  and  permitted 
them  to  choose  from  among  the  active  cases  those  that  seemed  most 
desirable,  from  a  teaching  point  of  view,  for  the  students  to  handle. 
For  these  cases  the  institute  supervisors  were  given  the  same 
responsibihty  that  would  be  given  a  district  secretary  and,  since 
they  had  power  to  choose  suitable  cases  and  to  limit  the  number 
they  would  attempt  to  handle,  it  was  possible  to  give  careful 
instruction  in  technique  and  to  insist  upon  thoroughgoing  work 
in  a  way  that  could  hardly  have  been  done  by  the  Home  Service 
Section  itself  with  its  heavy  pressure  of  work  and  frequently 
inadequate  staff.  In  those  sections  of  the  country  where  high 
social-work  standards  had  not  yet  been  attained  a  modification 
of  this  same  method  made  it  possible  to  give  the  students  good 
field-work  training.  During  the  period  of  the  Institute,  the  Insti- 
tute supervisors  would  be  placed  practically  in  charge  of  one  or 
more  Home  Service  offices  in  small  cities  or  towns,  thus  giving 
them  an  opportunity  personally  to  give  the  students  good  instruc- 
tion in  case  work  and  office  routine  regardless  of  what  may  have 
been  the  standards  of  those  offices  prior  to  the  holding  of  the 
training  course. 

While  this  plan  for  Home  Service  training  involved  obvious 
administrative  problems  and  owed  a  considerable  measure  of  its 
success  to  the  co-operative  spirit  growing  out  of  the  war  situation 
it  at  least  indicates  how  the  school's  control  of  its  training  facihties 
lielps  to  overcome  the  handicap  of  lack  of  access  to  well-equipped 
rsocial  agencies.  If  schools  of  social  work  are  located  near  com- 
munities where  social  problems  exist  in  sufficient  variety,  and 
maintain  a  staff  of  competent  field-work  supervisors,  there  is  no 
reason  why  they  should  not  be  able  to  develop  the  training  facihties 
they  need.  This  assumption  by  the  school  of  social  work  of 
greater  responsibihty  for  the  students'  field-work  training  is  in 
accord  with  sound  teaching  policy  and  marks  out  a  method  of  pro- 
cedure which  seems  likely  to  be  more  generally  followed  in  the  future . 


EDUCATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK  615 

Another  important  problem  of  field-work  training  is  how  to 
bring  about  its  proper  correlation  with  the  classroom  instruction. 
At  what  time  in  the  course  should  field  work  begin?  Can  field 
work  be  carried  on  satisfactorily  by  students  whose  time  is  partly 
occupied  by  classroom  lectures  and  study?  Is  it  possible  to  plan 
the  practice  work  with  the  social  agencies  so  that  it  will  run  parallel 
with  the  courses  of  instruction  given  at  the  school? 

The  general  attitude  of  the  schools  of  social  work  to  this 
fundamental  problem  has  been  that  field  work  must  be  carried  on 
concurrently  with  classroom  instruction.  The  first  important  chal- 
lenge to  this  point  of  view  was  made  by  the  Smith  College  Train- 
ing School  for  Social  Work  which  was  established  in  1918.  In  a 
recent  bulletin  of  this  School  its  position  in  regard  to  the  place 
of  field  work  in  the  curriculum  is  set  forth  and  defended  as  follows: 

The  Smith  College  Training  School  for  Social  Work  is  a  graduate  profes- 
sional school  offering  work  that  falls  into  three  divisions :  a  summer  session  of 
eight  weeks  of  theoretical  instruction,  combined  with  clinical  observation;  a 
training  period  of  nine  months'  practical  instruction  carried  on  in  co-operation 
with  hospitals  and  settlements;  and  a  concluding  summer  session  of  eight 
weeks  of  advanced  study 

The  method  of  continuous  practice  is  believed  by  the  sponsors  of  the  school 
to  afiford  the  best  practical  training.  To  become  completely  assimilated  into 
the  organization,  the  student  must  give  full  time  to  the  work.  To  obtain  the 
richest  possible  experience,  the  student  should  be  on  duty  regularly  and  with- 
out interruption.  In  our  opinion,  practice  work  with  social  cases  and  social 
conditions  can  not  be  carried  on  satisfactorily  with  intensive  instruction,  since 
it  is  not  possible  to  regulate  human  problems,  sO  that  experience  will  nm  parallel 
with  theoretical  instruction.  Thjere  is  great  value  for  drill  and  discipline  as 
well  as  depth  of  experience  in  the  uninterrupted  practice  and  in  the  continuity 
of  theoretical  study  which  the  present  plan  provides. 

While  this  abrupt  departure  from  traditional  methods  was 
doubtless  influenced  somewhat  by  the  fact  that  the  location  of 
the  school  in  a  small  town  made  the  usual  type  of  field  work  not 
readily  accessible,  the  experiment  is  of  sufficient  significance  to 
deserve  careful  attention.  Whatever  one  may  think  of  the  solu- 
tion arrived  at,  it  represents  an  effort  to  escape  the  difficulties 
faced  by  those  who  insist  that  field-work  and  classroom  instruction 
must  always  go  hand  in  hand.     Because  of  the  complex  nature  of 


6 14  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

the  social  problems  dealt  with,  it  is  by  no  means  easy  to  assign 
the  students  definite  tasks  that  will  illustrate  step  by  step  the 
subjects  discussed  in  the  different  courses.  And  unless  correlation 
of  the  field  work  and  classroom  work  is  achieved  to  this  extent 
there  is  a  tendency  to  regard  them  as  two  separate  activities,  each 
invaluable  but  only  in  a  limited  measure  fitting  into  a  unified 
program.  As  a  matter  of  fact,  since  field  work  brings  the  students 
face  to  face  with  social  problems  of  absorbing  interest  that  demand 
an  immediate  solution  and  that  direct  attention  to  methods  appli- 
cable to  a  particular  situation,  students  are  more  likely  to  under- 
estimate the  value  of  wider  study  of  the  whole  problem  than  to 
regard  this  field  work  as  an  interpretation  of  the  problems  that 
have  already  been  discussed  in  the  classroom. 

Furthermore,  the  ten  or  fifteen  hours  a  week  that  it  is  possible 
to  give  to  field  work  when  carried  on  concurrently  with  class  work 
are  hardly  sufiicient  to  enable  the  student  to  do  much  constructive 
work.  The  agency  in  which  the  student  is  working  is  compelled 
to  assign  tasks  that  can  be  completed  in  the  limited  time  available. 
Very  important  types  of  field  work  may  need  to  be  omitted  entirely 
because  they  require  consecutive  effort  which  the  student  cannot 
give.  When  the  student's  time  is  divided  between  field  work 
and  classroom  lectures  and  assigned  readings,  it  becomes  a  diffi- 
cult problem  for  him  to  feel  himself  a  part  of  the  social  agency 
to  which  he  is  assigned  and  to  have  a  sense  of  responsibility  for  the 
work  undertaken. 

The  existence  of  these  difficulties  in  the  way  of  concurrent 
field  and  class  work  has  been  recognized  by  the  schools  of  social 
work,  but  thus  far  the  Smith  College  Training  School  is  the  only 
one  that  has  attempted  such  a  radical  solution.  Several  schools  of 
social  work  have  gone  to  the  length  of  marking  out  definite  blocks 
of  time  covering  one  or  more  weeks  which  are  devoted  to  uninter- 
rupted field  work.  Such  an  arrangement  is  of  real  value  in  learn- 
ing technique,  and  provision  ought  always  to  be  made  for  such 
practice  periods  during  the  course  of  study.  The  Smith  College 
plan,  however,  goes  much  farther  than  this  and  is  open  to  the 
serious  criticism  that  it  places  classroom  instruction  and  field 
work  in  separate  compartments  which  have  only  in  a  remote 


I 


EDUCATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK  615 

way  any  vital  relation  to  each  other.  Field  work  of  certain  kinds 
may  be  incompatible  with  class  instruction  and  intensive  study 
if  carried  on  concurrently,  and  field  work  designed  for  certain  pur- 
poses may  very  well  be  segregated  in  a  way  that  will  give  an 
opportunity  for  continuous  practice,  but  this  does  not  justify 
the  failure  to  accompany  the  class  instruction  with  appropriate 
kinds  of  field  work  that  would  give  the  students  first-hand  knowl- 
edge of  social  problems  and  of  the  methods  most  commonly  used 
in  dealing  with  them. 

It  will  probably  take  a  great  deal  more  careful  study  and 
experimentation  before  a  satisfactory  decision  is  reached  in  regard 
to  these  fundamental  field-work  problems.  Doubtless  consider- 
able confusion  has  been  caused  by  the  tendency  to  regard  field 
work  as  primarily  practice  work  with  a  social  agency  for  the 
purpose  of  learning  technique,  instead  of  thinking  of  it  in  its 
broader  meaning  as  including,  in  addition  to  the  practice  work, 
participation  in  social  research  and  investigation  and  working 
on  problems  designed  to  illustrate  the  principles  discussed  in  the 
classroom. 

Technical  courses  of  instruction  ought  always  to  be  accompanied 
by  their  appropriate  field  work,  regarded  as  an  inseparable  part  of 
the  course  and  supervised  by  those  who  are  famihar  with  the  con- 
tent of  the  class  instruction.  Field  work  of  this  kind  carried  on 
concurrently  with  class  instruction  need  not  have  as  its  chief  pur- 
pose the  acquirement  of  skill  through  work  experience.  It  may 
even  be  questioned  whether  students  ought  to  be  expected  to  gain 
their  technique  in  this  piecemeal  fashion.  This  part  of  their  train- 
ing may  possibly  be  carried  out  more  satisfactorily  by  uninterrupted 
practice  work  under  conditions  that  would  familiarize  them  with 
office  routine  and  compel  them  to  accept  responsibility  for  the  work 
assigned  them.  The  field  work  that  should  accompany  class  instruc- 
tion should  be  planned  with  direct  reference  to  the  content  of  the 
course.  Its  purpose  is  similar  to  that  of  the  field  work  in  a  course 
in  botany  or  geology  or  any  other  scientific  study.  To  be  of  edu- 
cational value  it  must  fit  step  by  step  into  the  subject-matter  of  the 
course  and  for  this  reason  cannot  readily  be  relegated  to  a  social 
agency.    It  has  been  the  failure  to  work  out  this  close  correlation 


6i6  TEE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

between  the  class  instruction  and  the  field  work  that  has  brought 
about  the  unfortunate  and  illogical  distinction  between  theoretical 
courses  and  practical  work. 

Courses  of  study  worthy  of  a  place  in  a  professional  school  ought 
to  be  theoretical  only  in  the  sense  that  all  work  whether  done  in 
class  or  in  the  field  seeks  to  test  out  theories  and  formulate  princi- 
ples and  devise  methods  for  the  purpose  of  attaining  increasingly 
better  results.  Field  work  is  one  part  of  the  process  by  which  these 
results  are  achieved.  Its  contribution,  however,  cannot  be  best 
made  by  simply  delegating  to  it  the  burden  of  providing  the  prac- 
tical side  of  the  training  of  social  workers.  As  long  as  we  hold  to 
this  idea  of  field  work,  we  have  made  little  progress  beyond  the 
apprenticeship  stage  of  training.  Education  for  social  work  should 
be  carried  on  by  means  of  courses  that  include  field  work  designed 
to  make  their  subject-matter  vital  and  concrete  and  of  such  a 
nature  that  this  field  work  is  not  inconsistent  with  intensive  and 
thorough  study. 

In  this  connection  it  is  well  to  remind  ourselves  that  the  grad- 
uates of  a  school  for  social  work  cannot  be  expected  to  have  ac- 
quired the  technical  skill  that  comes  only  through  long  practice. 
Much  of  the  confusion  in  regard  to  the  place  of  field  work  in  the 
curriculum  has  been  caused  by  the  tendency  to  give  technique  an 
emphasis  inconsistent  with  adequate  attention  to  other  aspects  of 
professional  training.  A  study  of  the  curriculum  of  schools  of  social 
work  leaves  the  impression  that  in  spite  of  the  advance  made  within 
recent  years,  they  still  follow  out  closely  the  methods  of  apprentice 
training.  The  field  work  that  is  given  a  central  place  in  the  cur- 
riculum from  the  beginning  to  the  end  of  the  course  of  study  is 
primarily  practice  work  with  social  agencies  for  the  purpose  of 
gaining  familiarity  with  their  technique  and  methods  of  work. 

In  arriving  at  a  critical  estimate  of  this  method  of  training,  help 
can  be  gained  by  reference  to  the  procedure  in  medical  education 
which  has  so  much  in  common  with  education  for  social  work.  The 
medical  school  arranges  its  courses  of  study  in  four  main  divisions 
and  gives  them  in  the  following  order:  (1)  physiology,  (2)  pa- 
thology, (3)  therapeutics,  (4)  hospital  experience.  In  the  first  part 
of  the  course  emphasis  is  placed  upon  a  knowledge  of  the  structure 


EDUCATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK  617 

and  functions  of  the  human  body,  followed  by  a  study  of  its  dis- 
eases and  abnormalities.  In  order  to  do  this  adequately,  the  appro- 
priate sciences  are  called  into  requisition  and  the  laboratory  is  exten- 
sively used.  It  is  only  in  the  latter  part  of  the  course  that  the 
student  is  expected  to  devote  much  time  to  clinical  experience.  By 
means  of  this  clinical  study  and  practice  the  student  gains  famili- 
arity with  the  methods  followed  in  the  diagnosis  and  treatment  of 
disease  and  with  the  procedure  of  the  operating  room,  but  this  is 
not  regarded  as  sufficient  equipment  for  successful  practice.  His 
graduation  from  the  medical  school  is  supposed  to  be  followed  by  a 
year  of  hospital  experience  where,  under  the  most  favorable  aus- 
pices, he  can  devote  his  whole  time  to  the  practice  of  his  profession. 
Education  in  social  work  should  also  proceed  in  this  orderly  and 
logical  way.  Beginning  with  a  study  of  the  structure  and  functions 
of  society,  with  emphasis  upon  social  research,  the  students  should 
be  led  gradually  into  the  field  of  social  pathology,  where  they  will 
study  the  methods  of  dealing  with  problems  arising  out  of  social 
maladjustments  and  abnormal  conditions.  Here  the  clinical  field 
work  may  well  begin,  and  no  more  should  be  expected  of  it  than  is 
expected  of  the  clinics  attended  by  the  medical  student.  Famili- 
arity should  be  gained  with  methods  of  social  diagnosis  and  treat- 
ment and  there  should  be  opportunity  for  a  limited  amount  of 
practice  with  the  routine  work  of  different  kinds  of  social  agencies. 
But  the  acquirement  of  skill  that  comes  through  considerable  work 
experience  must  be  left  to  the  social-work  interneship  that  should 
follow  the  course  of  study  offered  by  a  school  of  social  work.  Only 
in  exceptional  cases  should  the  graduate  of  a  school  of  social  work 
be  considered  ready  for  a  position  of  independent  responsibility.  It 
should  become  as  common  as  it  now  is  in  the  medical  profession  for 
the  social-work  graduate  to  undergo  an  apprenticeship  of  varying 
length  in  his  chosen  field  where  under  favorable  conditions  he  can 
acquire  professional  skill.  When  this  comes  to  be  regarded  as  the 
accepted  procedure  to  follow,  it  will  be  possible  to  give  field  work 
its  proper  place  in  the  course  of  study  and  to  plan  a  more  thor- 
oughgoing training  course  than  can  now  be  done. 

[To  be  continued] 


COMMUNICATION    FROM    THE    PRESIDENT    OF    THE 
AMERICAN  SOCIOLOGICAL  SOCIETY 

The  purpose  of  this  organization  is  to  secure  effective  co- 
operation and  mutual  helpfulness  in  their  distinctive  work  among 
all  its  members.  To  this  end  the  annual  meetings  of  the  Society 
should  not  be  confined  to  expressing  the  ideas  of  a  few  but  should 
bring  to  common  knowledge  the  most  significant  ideas  that  are 
developing  anywhere  among  its  membership. 

An  invitation  and  a  request  is  therefore  extended  to  all  mem- 
bers of  the  Society  to  notify  the  Secretary  of  their  opinions  as  to  the 
general  theme  and  plan  of  the  next  annual  meeting  and  especially 
to  inform  the  Secretary  of  any  topics  upon  which  they  have  results 
from  their  own  work  already  matured  or  maturing,  which  they 
wish  to  present  at  the  annual  meeting. 

The  general  subject  of  the  next  annual  meeting  of  the  Society 
will  be  selected  with  regard  for  any  common  trend  of  interest 
revealed  by  the  replies  to  this  request,  and  the  program  will  be 
arranged  as  far  as  possible  to  utilize  the  results  of  the  work  spon- 
taneously undertaken  by  the  members. 

If  such  an  opportunity  is  desired  at  least  one  half-day  during 
the  annual  meeting  will  be  set  aside  for  sectional  meetings  devoted 
to  topics  which  are  of  special  interest  to  separate  divisions  of  our 
membership.  The  members  of  the  Society  are  invited  to  propose 
topics  to  which  they  wish  to  have  a  sectional  meeting  devoted. 
If  the  response  to  these  requests  is  as  general  as  is  hoped,  it  will 
of  course  be  impossible  to  act  upon  all  the  suggestions  received, 
but  they  all  will  be  given  the  most  hospitable  consideration,  and 
they  will  aflord  to  the  officers  of  the  Society  the  most  valued 
guidance. 

In  order  to  serve  the  purpose  effectively,  replies  should  be 
received  within  a  month  after  this  communication  is  published. 

Edward  Caey  Hayes 


6i8 


NEWS  AND  NOTES 


Notes  of  interest  to  the  readers  of  the  Journal  should  be  in  the  hands  of  the 
editor  of  "News  and  Notes"  not  later  than  the  tenth  of  the  month  preceding 
publication. 


Second  International  Congress  of  Eugenics 
The  Journal  has  received  the  preliminary  announcement  of  the 
Second  International  Congress  of  Eugenics  to  be  held  in  New  York  City 
September  22-28,  1921.  The  First  International  Congress  was  held  in 
London,  August,  191 2,  under  the  auspices  of  the  Eugenics  Education 
Society  and  the  presidency  of  Major  Leonard  Darwin.  According  to 
present  plans,  the  Congress  will  be  organized  into  four  sections.  The 
first  will  deal  with  the  results  of  research  in  the  domain  of  pure  eugenics 
in  animals  and  plants,  and  in  studies  in  human  heredity.  The  second 
section  will  consider  factors  which  influence  the  human  family,  and  their 
control.  The  third  section  will  concern  itself  with  the  topic  of  human 
racial  differences  in  relation  to  immigration,  racial  admixture,  and 
national  and  cultural  groups.  The  fourth  section  will  discuss  eugenics 
in  relation  to  the  state,  to  society,  and  to  education. 

The  honorary  president  of  the  Congress  is  Alexander  Graham  Bell. 
The  president  is  Henry  Fairchild  Osborn.  All  papers  for  presentation 
at  the  Congress  should  be  submitted  to  the  Secretary-General,  who  will 
see  that  they  are  received  and  considered  by  the  proper  section  of  the 
program  committee.  All  communications  should  be  addressed  to 
Dr.  C.  C.  Little,  Secretary-General,  American  Museum  of  Natural 
History,  77th  Street  and  Central  Park,  West,  New  York  City. 


The  Sociological  Society  of  London 
The  Sociological  Review  reports  that  during  January  there  was  an 
Exhibition  of   Civic  and  Regional  Surveys  at  Leplay  House.     The 
exhibit   included   surveys   of   Westminster,   Oxford,    Chelsea,  Saffron 
Walden,  Ludlow,  and  Newbury. 

Among  the  several  groups  of  the  Society  for  the  study  of  special 
problems,  the  most  active  at  present  are  the  group  in  social  psychology, 
the  group  formed  for  the  study  of  "La  science  sociale,"  and  the  group 
engaged  in  studying  rural  problems. 

619 


620  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

Institut  International  de  Sociologie 
The  International  Institute  of  Sociology  announces  the  election  as 
associates  of  Professor  John  P.  Lichtenberger,  of  the  University  of 
Pennsylvania,  first  vice-president  of  the  American  Sociological  Society* 
and  Professor  Scott  E.  W.  Bedford,  of  the  University  of  Chicago,  former 
secretary  of  the  American  Sociological  Society. 


Revue  de  lTnstitut  de  Sociologie 
The  Archives  Sociologiques  published  by  the  Institut  Solvay  of 
Brussels,  which  was  suspended  for  six  years  because  of  the  war,  has  made 
its  reappearance  under  the  title  Revue  de  VInstitut  de  Sociologie.  The 
Revue  will  appear  in  six  numbers  during  the  year,  each  issue  containing 
about  140  pages.  The  editors  are  G.  Barnich  and  G.  Hostelet.  Over 
one-third  the  space  of  the  Revue  is  devoted  to  bibUographies,  book 
reviews,  and  abstracts.  The  first  number,  issued  last  July,  contained 
an  article,  "La  raison  et  le  progres  moral,"  by  Professor  Edward  Gary 
Hayes,  of  the  University  of  Illinois.  Communications  should  be 
addressed  to  Institut  Solvay,  Pare  Leopold,  Brussels. 


Chicago  Commission  on  Race  Relations 
The  Chicago  Commission  on  Race  Relations  was  appointed  by 
Governor  Lowden  of  Illinois  to  inquire  into  the  causes  leading  up  to 
and  culminating  in  the  riot  of  July,  1919,  which  resulted  in  the  death  of 
twenty-three  negroes  and  fifteen  white  persons.  This  Commission  has 
been  engaged  since  February,  1920,  in  a  thorough  and  comprehensive 
inquiry  into  race  relations  in  general  with  special  inquiry  into :  housing, 
industry,  crime  and  police  administration,  racial  clashes,  race  contacts, 
and  public  opinion.  Throughout  this  study  the  emphasis  has  been 
placed  upon  the  social  and  psychological  aspects  of  the  relations  of  the 
white  and  negro  groups.  The  material  is  now  in  process  of  compilation. 
The  executive  secretary  of  the  Commission  is  Mr.  Graham  Romeyn 
Taylor;  the  associate  secretary  is  Mr.  Charles  S.  Johnson,  formerly  of 
the  Chicago  Urban  League. 


An  Employment  Service  Study 
A  study  of  public  employment  in  the  United  States  has  been  under- 
taken by   the  Russell  Sage  Foundation.     The  general  purpose  is  to 
gather   the  experience  of   this   country  in  planning,   organizing,   and 
administering  pubUc  employment  work.     The  work  undertaken  groups 


NEWS  AND  NOTES  621 

itself  into  three  main  parts.  First,  are  the  questions  which  have  to  do 
with  the  general  organization  and  administration  of  the  service.  They 
include,  among  others,  questions  as  to  federal,  federal-state,  or  some 
other  unit  of  administration ;  the  organization  and  function  of  the  service 
from  the  federal  center  to  the  local  ends;  the  status  of  the  service  in  the 
federal,  state,  or  local  government  organization;  and  the  distribution  of 
ofl&ces. 

Second,  are  the  questions  relating  to  the  administration  of  the  local 
ofl&ces,  and  the  technique  of  the  local  service.  They  include  office 
layout;  the  placement  process;  practice  in  receiving,  registering,  inter- 
viewing, and  referring  applicants;  forms  and  blanks  in  use;  and  so  on. 

And  third,  there  are  questions  as  to  the  place  and  function  of  the 
service  in  our  industrial  life,  local  and  national.  What  are  the  obstacles 
which  the  public  employment  service  must  meet  and  overcome  if  it  is 
to  have  a  healthy  and  reasonably  rapid  development?  etc. 

The  investigations  have  been  made  by  Mary  LaDame,  Leslie  E. 
Woodcock,  J.  B.  Buell,  Fred  A.  King,  and  Helen  B.  Russell,  nearly  all 
of  whom  have  been  employed  at  one  time  or  another  in  public  or  private 
employment  work.  Their  experience  has  been  gathered  in  several 
different  sections  of  the  country.  The  study  is  under  the  general 
direction  of  Shelby  M.  Harrison. 


Study  of  Women  Delinquents 

The  Bureau  of  Social  Hygiene  announces  the  publication  of  a  book 
entitled  "A  Study  of  Women  Delinquents  in  New  York  State."  The 
authors  of  the  book  are  Dr.  Mabel  R.  Fernald,  assistant  professor  of 
psychology.  University  of  Minnesota,  formerly  director,  Laboratory  of 
Social  Hygiene;  Dr.  Mary  H.  S.  Hayes,  formerly  psychologist,  and 
Ahnena  Dawley,  formerly  sociologist  of  the  Bureau  of  Social  Hygiene 
and  now  of  the  Pennsylvania  School  of  Social  Work.  The  book  includes 
a  statistical  chapter  by  Beardsley  Ruml. 

Six  groups  of  women  were  studied:  (i)  Women  committed  to  the 
State  Reformatory  at  Bedford  Hills.  This  group  include  felons,  mis- 
demeanants, and  women  convicted  of  such  offenses  as  soliciting  on  the 
public  streets,  frequenting  disorderly  houses,  loitering,  etc.  (2)  A  group 
of  felons  committed  to  the  State  Prison  at  Auburn.  (3)  Misdemeanants 
and  felons  committed  to  the  New  York  Penitentiary.  (4)  A  group  of 
minor  offenders  committed  to  the  New  York  City  Workhouse.  (5)  A 
group  committed  to  the  Magdalen  Home,  now  Inward  House.  (6)  A 
group  of  women  convicted  in  the  night  court  and  placed  on  probation. 


622  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

Students'  Dissertations  in  Sociology 
The  next  issue  of  the  Journal  will  contain  a  list  of  doctoral  disser- 
tations and  Masters'  theses  now  in  preparation  in  American  universities 
and  colleges.  Letters  have  been  sent  to  departments  which  last  year  re- 
ported graduate  work  in  sociology.  If  any  department  with  candidates 
for  higher  degrees  in  sociology  has  been  omitted,  information  will  be 
appreciated  upon  the  following  points:  names  of  candidates,  present 
degrees  with  institutions  conferring  them,  title  of  thesis  with  probable 
year  of  completion. 

RocKFORD  College 
Professor  Seba  Eldridge,  head  of  the  department  of  the  social  sciences, 
announces  the  inception  of  a  new  social-science  series  under  his  editor- 
ship, and  bearing  the  imprint  of  Thomas  Y.  Crowell  Company.  Arrange- 
ments have  already  been  made  for  books  on  the  following  topics: 
economics  considered  as  a  social  science,  by  Professor  Lionel  Edie ;  history 
of  socialism,  by  Dr.  Harry  W.  Laidler;  international  government,  by 
Dr.  Jessie  Wallace  Hughan;  labor  problems,  by  Professor  Gordon  S. 
Watkins;  crime  and  punishment,  by  Clarence  Darrow.  It  is  expected 
that  all  these  contributions  to  the  series,  with  the  exception  of  Professor 
Watkins'  treatise  on  labor  problems,  will  appear  during  the  present 
year.  The  series  is  to  be  broad  in  scope,  and  will  include  books  on 
government  and  economics  as  well  as  on  sociology  proper. 


Wittenberg  College 
Professor  Paul  H.  Heisey,  of  the  University  of  Dubuque,  Dubuque, 
Iowa,  has  accepted  a  call  to  the  chair  of  rehgious  education  and  Sunday- 
school  work  at  Wittenberg  College,  Springfield,  Ohio.     He  goes  to  the 
new  position  in  September,  192 1. 


REVIEWS 


Der  Untergang  des  Ahendlandes.  Umrisse  einer  Morphologic  der 
Weltgeschichte.  Von  Oswald  Spengler.  Band  I:  Gestalt 
und  Wirklichkeit.  Pp.  xv+615.  Miinchen:  Beck,  1921. 
(American  price,  $6.00.)  Band  II.  W elthistorische  Perspek- 
tiven.     (Not  yet  received.) 

The  title-page  of  the  copy  before  us  carries  the  statement  that  it  is 
one  of  the  "51st  to  53d  thousand."  This  is  an  index  of  the  amount  of 
notice  which  the  book  has  attracted  in  Germany.  It  has  even  started 
discussion  of  the  question,  "  What  will  be  its  effect  on  religion  ?"  Enough 
copies  have  already  reached  this  country  to  give  it  extended  publicity. 
Responsibility  to  our  constituency  demands  then  that  space  enough  be 
given  to  the  volume  to  assure  our  professional  readers  that  they  may 
safely  dismiss  all  suspicion  of  obligation  to  analyze  it  for  themselves. 
As  it  is  negligible  from  the  standpoint  of  technical  social  science,  it  also 
contains  nothing  over  which  there  is  the  slightest  occasion  for  a  rehgious 
or  theological  flutter. 

In  brief,  the  book  is  the  latest  attempt  to  cast  the  horoscope 
of  the  world's  history.  On  page  65  the  author  naively  gives  away 
the  situation  which  the  first  Une  of  his  Preface  had  led  the  writer 
to  suspect.  He  frankly  states  that  in  191 1  he  felt  a  call  to  "take 
a  broad  view  of  certain  poHtical  phenomena."  He  impKes,  though 
he  does  not  directly  state,  that  at  this  time  not  only  was  "the 
world-war  as  the  already  inevitable  external  form  of  the  historical 
crisis  immediately  impending,"  but  that  he  had  detected  this  immedi- 
acy.   Thereupon  he  felt  called  upon  to  discover  the  reasons  for  it 

"in  the  spirit  of  the  previous — not  years  but — centuries."  He  goes  on  to  say 
that  in  pursuit  of  his  originally  limited  task  he  came  to  the  realization  "that 
for  actual  understanding  of  the  epoch  the  circumference  of  the  bases  must  be 
more  widely  drawn;  that  it  is  wholly  impossible  to  confine  an  investigation 
of  this  sort  to  a  single  period  and  to  its  group  of  political  events,  to  hold  it 
within  the  frame  of  pragmatic  considerations,  and  even  to  inhibit  purely 
metaphysical,  highly  transcendental  speculations — all  of  which  is  necessary 
in  order  to  arrive  at  results  that  will  have  the  attestation  of  profound  necessity. 
It  became  apparent  that  a  political  problem  cannot  be  understood  from 
within  politics  itself;  that  essential  currents  which  work  in  the  depths  come 
into  intelligibility  only  in  the  realm  of  art,  and  indeed  only  in  the  form  of  far 

623 


624  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

removed  scientific  and  purely  philosophical  ideas At  last  it  was  per- 
fectly clear  that  no  fragment  of  history  can  be  completely  illuminated  until  the 
secret  of  world  history  in  general,  or  more  precisely  that  of  the  higher  stratum  of 
humanity  as  an  organic  unity  or  orderly  structure,  is  completely  clarified." 

Ergo,  the  author's  mission  to  reveal  that  which  has  remained  hidden 
from  the  wise  and  prudent  from  the  foundation  of  the  world! 

No  more  delicious  specimen  of  the  "echt  deutsch"  in  thinking  could 
be  desired.  It  dawns  upon  an  earnest  and  talented  man  that  the  every- 
day is  a  manifestation  of  the  All.  Thereupon  he  feels  himself  delegated 
of  destiny  to  extemporize  a  philosophy  of  the  All.  He  has  been  trained 
as  a  mathematician.  He  has  not  been  trained  as  a  social  scientist. 
He  has  only  the  faintest  conception  of  the  struggles  of  social  philosophers, 
time  out  of  mind,  to  produce  credible  interpretations  of  the  All.  He 
does  not  know  a  thousandth  part  of  the  searchings  that  have  resulted 
in  nothing  but  demonstration  of  the  futility  of  the  proposed  techniques 
of  research.  He  has  not  assimilated  what  has  become  instinctive  with 
conventionally  trained  students  of  social  science,  about  the  false  starts 
which  have  been  made,  particularly  within  the  latest  two  hundred 
years,  in  attempting  to  fathom  the  mysteries  of  human  experience. 
An  auto-intoxicated  Quixote,  he  fares  forth  into  a  labyrinth  which, 
over  and  over  again,  has  been  partially  plotted  by  many  sorts  of  pioneers. 
He  shows  comparatively  Uttle  sense  of  the  economy  of  assembling  the 
lessons  of  their  experience.  Accordingly  every  step  of  his  course  falls 
within  the  footprints  of  some  predecessor,  and  the  tendency  of  each 
direction  which  he  takes  reveals  itself  in  advance  to  everyone  who  is 
at  all  familiar  with  the  history  of  social  philosophizing. 

Returning  to  page  5  we  find  the  author  revealing  the  secret  of  his 
presumed  prognosticating  power  as  follows:  "The  means  of  under- 
standing living  forms  is  analogy."  Sociologists  have  had  saddening 
experiences  with  analogy.  They  will  think  twice  before  putting  their 
trust  in  it  again.  The  sort  of  analogy  which  the  author  has  in  mind 
may  be  inferred  from  a  sentence  a  little  later  (p.  8) : 

Who  is  aware  that  a  profound  connection  of  form  exists  between  differential 
calculation  and  the  dynastic  state  principle  of  the  period  of  Louis  XIV;  between 
the  antique  civic  form  of  the  polls  and  the  Euclidian  geometry;  between  the 
space-perspective  of  occidental  painting  and  the  conquest  of  space  by  roads, 
telephones,  and  long-distance  weapons;  between  counterpoint  instrumental 
music  and  the  economic  credit  system  ? 

That  is,  the  author  offers  an  aesthetic  key  to  interpretation  of  history. 
In  short,  as  against  prevailing  psychological  approaches  to  the  problem, 


REVIEWS  625 

to  be  typified,  let  us  say,  by  the  method  of  Professor  Hobhouse,  he 
advocates  a  plan  of  approach  more  like  that  of  Professor  Patrick  Geddes, 

As  the  exhibit  unreels  it  turns  out  that  the  author's  "analogy"  is 
not  only  a  symbolism  which  is  invisible  to  the  uninitiated,  but  that  the 
symbols  pass  into  a  cipher  code  which  by  comparison  makes  the  alleged 
Baconian  scheme  look  obvious  and  simple. 

The  fundamental  assumption  of  the  book  is  that  civilization  is  what 
goes  on  in  the  most  esoteric  cells  of  the  brains  of  the  intellectually  and 
artistically  elect  (p.  8).  (Cf .  pp.  523-24.)  This  hypothesis  has  never  been 
less  plausible  than  since  the  German  war.  No  civilization  can  be  known 
by  its  intelligentsia  without  discount  for  its  inarticulates.  Moreover,  it  is 
highly  improbable  that  the  ratio  of  the  intellectual  to  the  non-intellectual 
factors  is  identical  in  any  two  civilizations.  Indeed,  a  better  selhng 
proposition,  as  the  phrase  goes,  would  be  that  the  intelligentsia  and  the 
individually  negligible  factors  have  meaning  for  the  civilization  of  a 
period  in  a  ratio  similar  to  that  which  the  wakes  of  all  the  ships  that  sail 
the  seven  seas,  on  the  one  hand,  and  the  ocean  depths,  on  the  other,  have 
to  its  commerce.  Not  consistently,  but  as  a  rule,  Spengler  abstracts 
this  "highbrow"  factor  from  the  total  of  human  experience,  arid  essays 
a  philosophy  of  that  alone.  He  thereby  throws  up  the  attempt  to 
interpret  history,  by  confining  himself  to  a  single  strand  in  history.  If 
he  really  intends  to  seek  out  an  interpretation  of  history,  in  the  sense  of 
the  totaUty  of  men's  past  experience,  the  supposition  that  the  explana- 
tion is  to  be  found  in  this  single  thread  in  the  tapestry  is  too  naive  for 
consideration  by  responsible  social  scientists. 

Spengler's  assault  upon  the  conventionalities  of  historians  is  spicy 
reading.  By  comparison  it  makes  Nordau's  heresies  look  orthodox. 
The  criticism  goes  over  ground,  however,  which  sociologists  have 
traversed  for  a  generation  in  debate  with  the  historians.  It  is  vigorous 
argument  as  to  the  inconclusiveness  of  the  conceptions  which  have 
furnished  the  background  for  most  historical  writing,  but  it  does  not 
help  the  author's  case  as  proposer  of  a  substitute.  Spengler's  method 
of  divination  reaches  the  dictum  (p.  20)  that  European  civilization 
(Kultur)  is  "a  precisely  definable  phenomenon  between  the  years  1000 
and  2000  A.D."  Moreover  (p.  36),  ''The  period  1800-2000  in  occidental 
KuUur  is  identical  with  Hellenism.  Particularly  is  the  end  of  the  war 
identical  with  the  transition  from  the  Hellenistic  to  the  Roman  period." 
The  prospectus  of  the  destiny  which  Spengler  declares  is  in  brief  this: 
On  or  about  the  year  2000,  the  world  is  to  resolve  itself  into  a  few  prov- 
inces, each  subject  to  a  metropoHs,  where  a  Super-Cecil-Rhodes  is  to 


626  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

reign.  This  may  or  may  not  turn  out  to  have  been  a  good  guess.  Mean- 
while, in  spite  of  its  attendant  parade  of  learning,  it  remains  a  guess, 
nothing  more.  As  a  sheer  betting  proposition,  which  is  all  the  guess 
amounts  to,  the  odds  would  favor  any  decently  restrained  formula  of 
denatured  sovietism.     Then  the  author  proceeds  (p.  55): 

Hitherto  everyone  has  been  free  to  hope  for  whatever  sort  of  future  one 
wished.  Where  there  are  no  facts  the  feelings  govern.  In  the  future  it  will 
be  everyone's  duty  to  learn  of  the  impending  what  can  and  will  occur,  with 
the  unalterable  necessity  of  a  destiny,  and  quite  independent  of  our  personal 
ideals  or  those  of  the  age.  If  we  use  the  questionable  word  freedom,  at  all 
events  it  is  not  within  our  hberty  to  realize  this  or  that,  but  merely  that  which 
is  necessary. 

Waiving  the  trifle  that  there  is  nothing  whatever  in  the  book  which 
is  established  as  a  foundation  for  this  dogmatism,  we  may  be  able  to 
imagine  ourselves  reduced  to  the  belief  that  the  future  of  the  world  is 
fixed  in  detail  by  inexorable  fate.  We  cannot,  however,  imagine  our- 
selves accepting  the  claim  of  any  visionary  who  offers  himself  that  he  is 
authorized  to  reveal  the  terms  of  that  fate. 

At  the  end  of  his  Introduction  the  author  reduces  his  apocalypse  to 
conspectus  form  in  three  ingenious  tables.  They  dutifully  correspond 
with  his  own  term  "morphology."  They  are  verbal-visual  symbols 
of  the  "soul"  of  various  civilizations  as  he  reacts  to  them.  There  is 
no  pretense  of  making  out  an  evolutionary  nexus.  Analogy,  naked  and 
unashamed,  is  all  the  sanction  claimed. 

With  this  showing  of  the  author's  plan,  everyone  competent  to 
evaluate  method  will  know  whether  it  is  worth  while  to  follow  him  in 
detail.  No  matter  what  opinions  a  writer  may  set  forth  if  his  procedure 
is  intrinsically  incompetent  to  validate  any  opinion  whatsoever. 

In  brief,  the  book  is  exactly  what  one  might  expect  from  an  excep- 
tionally gifted  writer  who  is  as  to  vocation  a  mathematician,  as  to 
proclivity  a  mystic,  as  to  ambition  a  cosmic  philosopher.  It  is  spangled 
thick  with  pearls  of  impression,  but,  with  certain  notable  exceptions, 
they  are  wondrously  wrought  from  messy  paste.  Varying  the  figure, 
almost  any  paragraph  chosen  at  random  might  act  as  a  mental  cocktail, 
but  therewith  the  whole  story  is  told,  so  far  as  the  methodological 
verdict  is  at  issue.  Intellectual  nutrition  is  conspicuously  absent.  The 
escapade  has  substantially  the  same  relation  to  social  science  which 
Jules  Verne's  writings  have  to  physical  science.  It  kaleidoscopes  a  large 
amount  of  knowledge  into  a  historical  extravaganza. 

One  can  hardly  believe  that  the  author  had  ever  heard  of  Earth's 
Philosophie  der  Geschichte  als  Sociologie,  or  of  Robert  Flint's  Philosophy 


REVIEWS  627 

of  History,  first  edition.  Either  work  might  have  suggested  enough  sober 
second  thoughts  to  deter  a  reasonably  cautious  amateur  from  adding  to 
the  long  list  of  futile  attempts  to  accompUsh  the  impossible. 

Albion  W.  Small 


The  Grand  Strategy  of  Evolution.  The  Social  Philosophy  of  a  Biolo- 
gist. By  William  Patten,  Professor  of  Biology  in  Dartmouth 
College.     Boston:  Richard  G.  Badger,  1920.     Pp.  xviii+412. 

$5.00. 

The  universal  end,  or  purpose  in  life,  and  in  nature,  is  to  construct,  to 
create,  or  grow.  The  ways  and  means  of  accomplishing  that  end  are  mutual 
service,  or  co-operative  action,  and  Tightness. 

Two  reciprocal  processes  are  always  manifest  in  this  co-operative  nature- 
action:  construction  and  destruction;  organization  and  disorganization.  We 
may  also  call  these  universal  processes  of  give  and  take,  good  and  evil,  anabolism 
and  cataboUsm,  egoism  and  altruism.  But  as  this  nature-metabohsm,  as  a 
whole,  is  cumulative  and  progressive,  there  is  but  one  all-pervading  attribute 
of  nature,  namely  Tightness,  which  becomes  manifest  to  us  as  constructive, 
or  creative  action,  or  growth. 

I  shall  speak,  not  as  a  scientist  in  the  conventions  of  science I 

have  thrown  the  small  verbal  cash  and  other  impedimenta  of  my  native 
province  into  the  melting  pot,  using  wherever  possible  the  irreducible  sovereign 
terms  current  in  all  mental  exchange.  And  if  you  who  read  will  also,  for  the 
moment,  lay  aside  your  own  trappings,  coming  foot-free  with  me  over  some 
neglected  trails,  it  may  be  that  we  shall  see  more  clearly  from  our  new  point 
of  view — and  perhaps  more  convincingly  because  of  its  scientific  setting — that 
elemental  truth  which  governs  aUke  all  the  institutions  of  man  and  of  nature. 
The  right  to  exist  and  the  obligation  to  serve  are  one  and  inseparable;  for  to  exist 
is  to  give,  and  to  give  is  to  receive. 

The  foregoing  sentences  are  the  substance  of  the  Preface  of  a  book 
which  it  is  an  inspuration  to  read  and  a  duty  to  recommend.  It  is  the 
sort  of  book  which  carries  not  the  burr  or  the  shell  or  the  boxes  or  burlaps 
in  which  nature  or  man  has  packed  the  makings  of  knowledge  and 
wisdom;  but  reaUty  in  shape  to  be  converted  into  immediate  under- 
standing. It  is  a  book  of  the  kind  which  epitomizes  an  intellectual  and 
moral  epoch.  It  brings  forth  things  new  and  old  in  a  manner  which 
dramatizes  the  contrast  between  the  thought-world  of  its  era  and  that 
of  the  era  when  men  reflected  the  actual  world  in  the  latest  previous 
tentative  picture.  It  is  the  kind  of  book  which  is  a  liberal  education  in 
itself.     It  should  take  the  blur  out  of  eyes  that  can  see  in  the  world  of 


628  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

experience  at  most  nothing  better  than  chaos  camouflaged  by  con- 
vention; contradiction  contradicted  by  classification;  a  darkness  and 
light,  good  and  bad  at  perpetual  war,  censored  by  dogma  into  a  con- 
ceptual peace.  It  is  a  book  fit  to  emancipate  people  who  have  been 
taught  that  nature  is  bad,  grace  is  good,  and  God  a  shock-absorber 
between  the  two.  It  is  a  book  to  shame  the  type  of  pseudo-scientist 
who  has  learned  no  more  about  the  ways  of  nature  than  that  it  is  a 
dog-eat-dog  economy,  with  Bemhardi,  Tirpitz,  and  Hindenburg  as  its 
prophets.  It  is  a  book  for  every  preacher  who  is  still  preaching  that 
evolutionist  and  Christian  are  mutually  exclusive  terms.  It  is  a  book 
for  every  teacher  who  hopes  there  is  a  continuity  and  consistency  of 
cosmic  processes,  including  the  social  realm,  but  is  not  quite  able  to 
make  them  out.  It  is  a  book  for  every  student  of  school,  or  post- 
school,  age  who  wants  to  know  the  best  that  is  known  about  the  ground 
plan  on  which  mundane  affairs  proceed. 

In  the  first  280  pages  the  author  epitomizes  the  ways  in  which  the 
evolutionary  method  works  in  nature.  It  is  the  most  lucid  presentation 
of  the  subject  to  the  lay  mind  that  we  have  seen.  The  remaining  150 
pages  indicate  how  the  evolutionary  method  develops  after  "man's 
mental  imagery  (as)  a  prime  creative  factor"  begins  to  be  the  differ- 
entiating element. 

The  guiding  idea  in  this  part  of  the  agreement  is  formulated  as 
follows  (p.  277): 

All  constructive  problems  in  social  life  may  be  resolved  into  secondary 
problems  of  ways  and  means  of  extending  the  principles  of  co-operative  action 
to  larger  and  larger  groups,  or  conditions,  for  longer  and  longer  periods.  To 
that  end,  correspondingly  larger  experience,  more  comprehensive  vision,  and 
greater  tenacity  or  purpose  are  essential.  But  the  constructive  method  will 
always  remain  the  same. 

It  would  not  be  surprising  if  the  charge  should  be  brought  against 
the  social  philosophy  of  the  book  that  it  is  merely  a  revival  of  the  dis- 
credited "biological  sociology"  of  a  generation  ago.  On  the  contrary, 
even  Karl  Menger,  who  subjected  that  crude  technique  to  the  most 
damaging  criticism,  would  probably  admit  that  the  method  of  this 
exposition  is  guiltless  of  the  errors  he  exposed.  The  obsolete  "biological 
sociology"  started  with  a  fanciful  morphological  conception  of  "society" 
as  a  body  analogous  with  a  physiological  organism.  The  method  of 
this  book  makes  no  a  priori  assumptions.  It  simply  recognizes  growth 
functions  as  they  follow  one  another  out  of  the  physical  into  the  social 
realm,  and  it  shows  how  understanding  of  physical  functions  may  help 


RJEVIEWS  629 

to  understanding  of  social  functions.  It  does  not  arbitrarily  super- 
impose anything  biological  upon  the  social.  It  shows  how  vision  trained 
by  acquaintance  with  methods  of  growth  on  the  physical  levels  may  the 
better  detect  growth  methods  on  the  social  levels. 

It  may  be  said,  too,  that  the  book  overworks  the  structural  aspects 
both  of  nature  and  of  human  relations.  The  word  "architecture"  has 
a  prominence  out  of  proportion  to  the  functional  aspects  of  the  growth 
reality  which  it  is  supposed  to  be  expounding.  In  the  reviewer's  judg- 
ment the  fault  is  real,  but  it  is  more  in  appearance  than  in  actual  effect. 
The  author's  whole  emphasis  is  so  obviously  upon  growth  that  the 
statical  connotations  of  the  term  "architecture"  do  not  obscure  the 
functional  process  which  it  is  used  to  clarify. 

On  the  whole,  no  book  in  the  entire  post-Darwinian  literature  equals 
this  volume  as  a  guide  to  the  congruity  between  the  constructive  pro- 
cesses of  nature  and  the  moral  economics  of  "the  psychic  factors,"  as 
Lester  F.  Ward  taught  us  to  call  them.  In  spirit  it  may  well  remind 
us  of  Drummond's  Natural  Law  in  the  Spiritual  World.  The  later 
writer,  however,  is  more  sure-footed  than  the  earlier  author,  both  on 
the  physical  and  the  spiritual  plane,  and  his  book  deserves  larger  and 
more  permanent  influence.  It  would  be  diflScult  to  overstate  the 
service  which  Professor  Patten  has  performed  in  teaching  the  lesson 
that  the  problem  of  life,  personal  and  pubUc,  is  not  to  be  solved  by 
"fighting  the  cosmic  process,"  but  by  "accepting  nature's  constructive 
Tightness  as  the  ethical  standard,  and  by  adopting  her  constructive 

methods  as  the  moral  code." 

Albion  W.  Small 


Principles  of  Sociology  with  Educational  Applications.    By  Fred- 
erick  R.   Clow.     New  York:    The  Macmillan   Company, 
1920.     Pp.    xiv+436.     $1.00. 
The  phenomenal  increase  in  the  popularity  of  sociology  as  a  study  is 
shown  by  the  demand  for  its  apphcation  in  institutional  fields.    This 
is  especially  true  in  education  as  evidenced  by  the  desire  of  publishers  to 
get  a  textbook  in  educational  sociology.    The  Century  Company  used 
that  title  for  W.  E.  Chancellor's  book,  when,  by  no  stretch  of  the  imagi- 
nation, could  it  be  rightfully  so  named.     It  devotes  only  one  very 
sketchy  chapter  out  of  thirty-seven  to  the  school  and  in  general  pays 
much  less  attention  to  education  than  does  the  average  textbook  on 
general  sociology. 


630  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

It  is  to  the  everlasting  credit  of  Dr.  Clow  that  in  his  text  he  has  used 
its  proper  title,  Principles  of  Sociology  with  Educational  Applications y 
even  though  his  publishers  did  print  on  its  back  Principles  of  Educational 
Sociology.  It  is  a  simply  worded,  well-organized,  and  thoroughly- 
suggestive  textbook  in  general  sociology  written  especially  for  teachers. 
Most  of  the  illustrative  material  is  such  as  would  appeal  to  them  and 
would  be  particularly  applicable  to  their  problems.  It  is  divided  into 
three  parts,  ''Factors  of  Society,"  "Social  Organization,"  and  "Social 
Progress. "  Part  II  is  the  longest  and  most  effective  of  the  three  divi- 
sions. At  the  close  of  each  chapter  is  a  series  of  topics  and  problems  and 
an  ample  list  of  specific  readings  for  classroom  use. 

One  feature  of  Dr.  Clow's  book  is  unique.  Long  quotations  are 
embodied  in  the  text,  either  at  the  end  or  in  the  midst  of  each  topic. 
It  thus  becomes  a  sort  of  combined  text  and  book  of  readings.  This 
arrangement  has  both  merits  and  defects.  Its  value  lies  in  the  fact  that 
students  must  perforce  become  acquainted  with  a  variety  of  authors  and 
realize  something  of  the  nature  and  wealth  of  sociological  literature. 
Also,  it  buttresses  the  author's  statements  with  accepted  authorities  and 
brings  into  immediate  juxtaposition  the  social  principle  and  its  prac- 
tical appHcation.  Its  weakness  lies  in  breaking  the  continuity  of  thought 
and  scattering  the  student's  psychic  energy.  Likewise  the  efifort  to 
combine  textual  discussion  with  topical  readings  requires  unnecessary 
brevity  for  each.  Dr.  Clow's  treatment  of  each  topic  would  be  more 
convincing  if  he  had  used  the  whole  space  for  his  own  discussion  and 
embodied  the  readings,  equally  enlarged,  in  another  book,  or,  perhaps 
better,  had  doubled  the  size  of  the  book.  Is  it  not  time  for  sociologists 
to  demand  more  time  for  an  elementary  course  and  to  use  more  elaborate 
textbooks,  or  if  a  manual  or  brief  text  is  used  to  guarantee  that  enough 
laboratory  work  is  done  to  avoid  the  imputation,  too  frequently  justified, 
that  it  is  a  "snap"  course  ? 

Dr.  Clow  has  given  us  a  thoughtful  and  much-needed  textbook  in 
general  sociology  for  teachers,  and  it  is  certain  to  be  widely  used,  particu- 
larly in  normal  schools. 

Walter  R.  Smith 
University  or  Kansas         

A   Digest  of  Educational  Sociology.    By  David  Snedden.     New 
York:    Teachers   College,  Columbia  University,   1920.     Pp. 
ix+264.     (Paper.) 
The  materials  in  this  volume  were  evidently  assembled  as  a  syllabus 

and  guide  for  the  author's  students  in  his  courses  in  educational  sociology. 


REVIEWS  631 

In  the  first  hundred  pages  there  is  a  digest  of  the  fundamentals  of  soci- 
ological theory — or,  more  accurately,  a  statement  of  problems  dealt  with 
in  this  theory;  and  along  with  this  are  presented  our  major  educational 
problems  from  the  sociological  point  of  view.  While  the  latter  half  of 
the  volume  continues  these  problems  by  breaking  them  up  into  greater 
detail  in  connection  with  school  subjects  and  grade  levels,  in  much  larger 
measure  it  becomes  an  outline  of  topics,  problems,  actual  and  hypotheti- 
cal cases,  etc.,  for  the  guidance  of  students  taking  the  course. 

It  is  probable  that  there  is  no  other  volume  yet  published  which 
states,  suggests,  and  contains  reference  to  so  wide  and  well-chosen 
an  array  of  fundamental  educational  problems.  Herein  lies  its  great 
value.  Rarely,  however,  are  the  problems  discussed,  explained,  or  made 
clear  to  the  novice  in  the  field.  For  the  discussion  he  must  go  to  the 
collateral  readings.  The  latter,  however,  in  the  present  condition  of  the 
literature,  rather  inadequately  treat  most  of  the  educational  problems. 
In  large  measure  the  student  must  draw  on  his  professional  experiences 
and  observations.  The  syllabus  is  therefore  best  for  mature  students 
who  have  had  practical  educational  experience. 

It  is  not  a  book  to  be  read;  it  is  a  reference  book  for  guidance  of 
research  and  study.  It  is  primarily  a  book  on  education  rather  than 
sociology — except  as  education  is  itself  one  of  the  major  fields  of  sociology. 

Franklin  Bobbitt 
University  of  Chicago 


A  General  Introduction  to  Psychoanalysis.  By  Professor  Sigmund 
Freud,  LL.D.  New  York:  Boni  and  Liveright,  1920.  Pp. 
viH-406.     $4.50. 

Sociologists  will  welcome  this  book,  for  it  gives  briefly,  clearly, 
and  with  authority  the  Freudian  system  of  psychology.  The  layman 
has  waited  for  a  complete,  up-to-date,  lucid  treatment  of  this  difficult 
subject;  and  here  it  is  by  the  master  himself.  Its  presentation  is  strate- 
gically divided  in  three  parts:  the  psychology  of  errors,  the  dream,  and 
the  general  theory  of  the  neurosis.  The  book  contains  much  material 
of  value  to  the  sociologists  without  regard  to  the  reader's  attitude  toward 
the  Freudian  hypothesis.  Examples  of  this  are  the  author's  discussion 
of  the  sublimating  value  of  art  and  the  sociological  significance  of  fear 
in  childhood. 

Although,  as  Stanley  Hall  suggests,  one  may  find  himself  in  opposi- 
tion to  Freud's  exaggerated  emphasis  upon  the  instinct  of  sex,  neverthe- 
less the  general  reader  will  regard  the  book  as  a  whole  as  less  extreme 


632  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

in  this  respect  than  are  the  works  of  many  of  Freud's  disciples.  The 
presentation  is  free  from  that  attitude  of  "  force-it-down- the-public's- 
throat-to-see-it-squirm,"  the  presence  of  which  in  some  Freudian  Utera- 
ture  has  repelled  the  unbeliever  and  distorted  Freud's  teaching.  The 
ego  instinct  is  given  recognition,  although  the  value  of  Adler's  contribu- 
tion is  not  justly  appreciated.  The  book  aims  to  be  constructive  rather 
than  controversial;  and  taking  into  account  the  subject-matter,  it  largely 
succeeds.  The  Preface,  much  too  brief,  gives  the  reader  a  favorable  but 
discriminating  entree. 

Ernest  R.  Groves 
Boston  University 


Social  Scandinavia  in  the  Viking  Age.  By  Mary  Wilhelmine 
Williams.  New  York:  The  Macmillan  Company,  1920. 
Pp.  X+451.    $5.00. 

Virile  Scandinavia,  during  the  most  spectacular,  romantic,  and 
dominant  period  of  its  career,  is  brought  intimately  before  the  reader  in 
this  book.  Other  students  of  peoples  might  well  follow  Dr.  Williams' 
example  in  her  presentation  of  a  people  during  the  formative  period  of 
its  development. 

The  book  has  the  virtue  of  presenting  a  well-rounded  picture  of  the 
life  of  the  people  studied.  It  is  as  complete  as  the  university  student 
or  instructor  would  require  who  did  not  need  to  go  to  the  original  sources. 

In  every  page  the  book  bears  evidence  of  thorough  and  painstaking 
study.  The  sources  from  which  Dr.  Williams  has  gathered  her  data  seem 
to  be  as  complete  as  one  could  reasonably  expect,  and  I  would  say  she 
has  not  neglected  any  source  open  to  her  use.  A  long  bibliography 
follows  the  text  of  the  book.  In  order  to  test  the  value  of  the  book  as  a 
source  I  several  times  sought  information  in  chapters  I  had  not  then  read. 
In  each  case  what  I  sought  was  found  and  in  its  proper  place. 

The  following  subject  headings  show  the  scope  of  the  book:  the  land 
and  the  people;  the  ties  of  kinship  and  nationality;  classes  of  society;  in- 
fancy, childhood,  and  youth;  dress  and  ornament;  marriage  and  divorce; 
position  of  women;  homesteads  and  houses;  house-furnishings  and  food; 
agriculture  and  the  routine  of  farm  life;  hunting,  fowling,  and  fishing; 
transportation;  trade  and  commerce;  markets  and  towns;  the  career  of 
the  Viking;  government;  system  of  justice;  social  gatherings;  language 
and  literature;  learning  in  general;  religion;  superstition;  and  death  and 
burial. 


REVIEWS  633 

The  study  is  thoroughly  and  consistently  objective.  In  fact,  I  fear 
it  is  too  much  so  to  hold  a  reader  who  has  not  either  a  definite  need  of 
the  data  or  a  kinship  interest  in  the  people  presented.  In  one  way,  how- 
ever, Dr.  Williams  puts  herself  into  every  few  pages  by  suggesting  higher 
phases  of  culture  than  her  sources  seem  to  allow.  The  pages  of  the  book 
are  sprinkled  with  the  words  "probably,"  "doubtless,"  and  "perhaps." 
I  failed  to  analyze  the  reason  for  these  words,  unless  it  was  an  unconscious 
zeal  for,  "probably"  a  pride  in,  the  Scandinavian  people  themselves.  I 
criticize  the  too  frequent  use  of  these  guess  words,  because  they  will 
waylay  the  judgment  of  even  the  careful  reader;  he  cannot  always  be 
sure  whether  certain  statements  of  the  book  present  real  conditions  as 
revealed  by  the  sources,  or  reasonably  justified  conclusions  of  the  author, 
or  desirable  conditions  with  which  she  quite  unconsciously  wishes  to 
impress  her  readers. 

This  study  will  be  of  great  value  to  students  of  peoples  in  America. 
The  individualistic  old-line  American  will  see  certain  of  his  own  traits 
and  characteristics  in  the  individualistic  old  Teuton  of  Scandinavia. 

The  quotations  from  the  sagas  placed  at  the  opening  of  each  chapter 
are  not  the  least  interesting  part  of  the  book. 

Albert  Ernest  Jenks 

University  of  Minnesota 


Klasserna  och  Samhallet.  By  Pontus  Fahlbeck.  Stockholm: 
P.  A.  Norstedt  &  Soners  Forlag,  1920.     Pp.  viii+413.     Kr.  18. 

The  author  of  this  book  has  been  a  teacher  of  political  science  and 
statistics  at  Lund  University  in  Sweden.  He  is  known  as  the  editor  of 
Statsvetenskaplig  Tidsskrift  and  as  the  author  of  several  books  on  sociolo- 
gical subjects.  In  1892  Fahlbeck  published  a  book  on  Stand  och  Klasser, 
and  judging  from  the  list  of  his  published  writings  his  chief  interest 
during  the  last  thirty  years  has  been  along  the  line  which  furnishes  the 
subject-matter  of  "Classes  and  Society."  The  work  of  this  seventy- 
year-old  author  therefore  presumably  represents  the  results  of  ample 
investigation  and  mature  thought  and  should  be  of  some  value  to  other 
students  of  society. 

The  present  volume  is  the  first  of  a  series  of  three  which  the  author 
intends  to  publish  on  the  subject  of  "Classes  and  Society."  In  this 
volume  the  author  attempts  to  trace  the  origin  of  classes  in  primitive 
society  and  the  development  of  class  systems  up  through  the  historical 
age  of  antiquity.  As  the  author  says  in  his  Introduction,  the  presenta- 
tion is  less  historical  than  typological,  and  the  main  topic  is  the  etiology 


634  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

and  morphology  of  classes.  He  accepts  the  results  of  historical  and 
ethnological  research  and  is  concerned  chiefly  with  the  sociological 
interpretation  of  these  data. 

Various  theories  of  the  origin  of  classes  which  have  been  put  forth 
are  weighed  and  found  wanting.  The  writer  agrees  with  Durkheim  that 
the  social  division  of  labor  should  be  regarded  as  the  most  important 
"driving  force"  of  culture  and  of  social  differentiation: 

But  it  is  so,  not  merely  as  a  technical  specialization  and  monopolization, 
and  still  less  as  a  purposeful  division  of  economic  production.  Rather  it  is 
such  as  the  result  of  an  unequal  evaluation  of  objects  and  the  consequent 

grouping  of  the  persons  who  occupy  themselves  with  these  objects This 

evaluation  receives  one  of  its  strongest  expressions  in  the  class  system.  For 
it  is  this  ....  which  is  the  raison  d'etre  of  the  social  division  of  labor  and  the 
hierarchy  of  higher  and  lower  classes  based  thereon. 

This  psychological  factor  of  evaluation  is  emphasized  throughout 
the  whole  treatment  of  "Classes  and  Society."  The  function  of  early 
religions  in  originating  and  fixing  social  values  and  in  maintaining  class 
distinctions  is  traced  with  some  care.  Subjection  through  war  or  un- 
equal distribution  of  wealth  would  have  failed  to  maintain  class  dis- 
tinctions were  it  not  for  the  creation  of  higher  sanctions  such  as  those  of 
religion. 

While  in  its  individual  aspect  classes  appear  merely  as  unequal 
stations  in  life,  in  its  broader  social  aspect  "class  systems  are  simply 
human  organizations  of  cultural  enterprise."  Despite  many  apparent 
differences  the  class  system  of  every  society  in  the  same  cultural  stage 
is  held  to  be  essentially  the  same.  On  the  other  hand  it  is  not  held  that 
culture  progresses  indefinitely  with  the  rising  degree  of  class  differentia- 
tion. The  apex  of  the  rising  trend  of  class  distinctions  has  been  reached 
in  the  feudal  and  caste  systems,  while  modern  culture  societies  have 
tended  toward  a  gradual  weakening  of  sharp  class  distinctions. 

The  full  treatment  of  classes  in  modern  society  is  deferred  to  a  later 
volume.  But  although  this  volume  aims  to  treat  specifically  only  the 
class  systems  of  primitive  and  ancient  societies  it  is  written  with  a  con- 
stant reference  to  modern  conditions  and  current  movements  which 
makes  it  a  book  of  present  interest.  One  senses  through  its  pages  the 
reality  of  the  problem  of  classes  in  Europe  and  elsewhere  in  the  world 
of  today. 

What  the  relative  value  of  this  contribution  to  sociological  literature 
may  be  I  shall  leave  to  more  competent  critics  to  decide. 

Oscar  B.  Ytrehus 


REVIEWS  635 

Woman  and  the  New  Race.  By  Margaret  Sanger.  New  York: 
Brentano,  1920.     Pp.  234.     $2.00. 

It  is  hard  to  see  how  Havelock  ElHs  could  have  written  such  a  ful- 
some preface  for  an  inferior  and  poorly  titled  presentation  of  the  subject 
of  birth-control.  As  Beecher  said,  speaking  after  the  tirade  of  a  man- 
hating  war-horse  of  a  suffragette,  "Nevertheless,  we  believe  in  Women's 
Rights."  Fearless  dogmatism  rather  than  scientific  judgment  has 
produced  the  notoriety  through  which  Mrs.  Sanger  has  unfortunately 
become  known  as  American  protagonist  of  this  movement.  It  is  this 
conspicuous  position  which  alone  seems  to  justify  a  full  review  of  this 
bit  of  unscientific  propaganda. 

The  general  argument  is  sound  and  obvious:  overpopulation  causes 
many  evils.  Woman  is  both  victim  and  cause,  and  is  largely  ignorant 
of  results  and  remedies.  Birth-control,  when  freed  from  stupid  laws, 
will  doubtless  help,  as  is  shown  by  conditions  in  Holland  and  in  Aus- 
traha.  Sound  medical  research  is  wisely  urged  and  predicted.  Many 
of  the  facts  which  the  author  marshals  in  support  also  seem  reliable. 
They  are  rendered  weak,  however,  by  frequent  emotional  or  special 
pleading  and  by  questionable  and  extreme  statements.  The  reviewers 
find  themselves  asking  what  unconscious  background  must  motivate 
such  opinions. 

Among  her  statements  or  implications  are  the  following: 

1.  That  only  the  married  woman  who  has  been  constantly  loved 
by  the  most  understanding  and  considerate  of  husbands  has  escaped 
[certain]  horrors. 

2.  That  feeble-minded  children  result  from  alcoholic  or  insane 
parents,  or  from  too  frequent  child-bearing.  (Cause  and  effect  are 
perhaps  reversed  here.) 

3.  That  infanticide  has,  in  the  past,  improved  the  position  of  women. 

4.  That  a  woman  is  physically  fittest  for  marriage  at  twenty-five. 
(Bertillon  to  the  contrary.) 

5.  That  a  preliminary  period  of  childless  marriage  improves  family 
life. 

6.  That  women  conceive  more  easily  after  an  abortion,  and  that 
a  "cold"  woman  conceives  more  easily  than  does  a  passionate  one. 

7.  That  the  average  mother  of  a  baby  every  year  or  two  has  been 
forced  into  unwilling  motherhood,  so  far  as  the  later  arrivals  are  con- 
cerned. 

8.  That  progressive  variations  in  evolution  are  due  to  the  female 
rather  than  the  male. 


636  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

9.  That  there  is  a  beneficial  exchange  of  magnetism  between  the 
sexes  in  Shaker  marriage. 

10.  That  nursing  a  child  after  twelve  months  tends  to  produce 
brain  disease  in  the  child  and  deafness  and  blindness  in  the  mother. 

11.  That  midwives,  as  well  as  physicians,  should  be  permitted  to 
impart  contraceptive  information. 

12.  That  Christianity  has  set  back  the  progress  of  women  by  a 
thousand  years. 

For  many  of  these  statements  she  oflfers  no  authority  other  than  her 
own.  Even  where  plausible  evidence  is  offered,  her  cause  is  not  helped 
by  attacking  Christianity  and  the  male  sex.  Whether  or  not  Mrs. 
Sanger  wants  their  co-operation,  the  support  of  men  and  of  the  churches 
is  very  essential  to  the  new  morality  of  parenthood. 

She  ignores  those  arguments — like  those  from  immigration  or  in- 
dustry— which  have  also  been  used  with  some  plausibility  by  the  advo- 
cates of  larger  families.  Hofifman  (the  "prudential"  statistician) 
would  turn  in  his  gravity  to  find  anything  he  wrote  used  to  support 
birth-control! 

Her  general  fallacy  is  the  common  one  of  confusing  an  indispensable 
cause  with  an  exclusive  cause.  She  follows  the  chain  of  causation  in 
each  problem  only  until  she  finds  her  pet  link. 

But,  most  fundamental,  her  entire  point  of  view  (insufliciently  offset 
by  two  or  three  scattered  pages)  seems  essentially  selfish.  She  em- 
phasizes the  emancipation  of  women  rather  than  the  welfare  of  the 
family  or  of  the  child,  which  she  calls  a  more  selfish  interest.  The 
"feminine  spirit"  for  which  she  pleads,  is  but  a  projection  of  her  own 
protest  against  economic,  political,  and  other  domination.  To  the 
reviewers,  it  would  appear  that  what  she  is  striving  for  in  this  respect 
is  the  basic  rights  of  human  nature  rather  than  of  specifically  feminine 
nature. 

A  more  constructive  and  positive  approach  to  this  problem  is  being 
worked  out  from  the  standard  of  organic  welfare,  including  both  sexes, 
family  and  society,  worthy  childhood,  and  voluntary  parenthood.  Men, 
also,  have  been  degraded,  kept  ignorant.  Why  not  develop  fathers 
as  fathers,  quite  as  much  as  develop  mothers,  whether  as  mothers,  as 
women,  or  as  humans? 

It  is  hard  to  blame  Mrs.  Sanger  for  the  shortcomings  of  this  book: 
we  might  feel  as  she,  were  we  to  read  as  many  letters  like  those  she 
publishes.  Doubtless,  however,  she  does  not  hear  nor  see  so  much  of 
the  happily  married.    To  understand  and  pardon  does  not,  however. 


REVIEWS  637 

warrant  approval:  the  cause  is  so  fundamental  and  worthy  that  it  must 
be  defended  even  from  its  friends.  One  may  admire  the  courage  and 
value  the  sacrifice  of  a  pioneer  and  yet  refuse  to  recognize  her  as  a  wise 
leader.  Sensationalism  may  already  have  seriously  handicapped  the 
movement  by  associating  it  in  the  public  mind  with  the  oidre  and  morbid. 
Possibly  a  reading  of  Aristophanes'  marriage-strike  might  restore  a 
sense  of  humor  to  the  subject. 

S.  W.  AND  T.  D.  Eliot 
Northwestern  University 


What  the  Workers  Want — A  Study  of  British  Labor.  By  Arthur 
Gleason.  New  York:  Harcourt,  Brace  and  Howe.  Pp.518. 
$4.00. 

A  panorama  of  the  contending  and  thinking  forces  affecting  or  being 
affected  by  the  labor  movement  in  Great  Britain  is  presented  by  the 
writer  in  all  its  human  aspects.  There  is  a  sincerity  and  lack  of  artistry 
in  this  book  that  gives  the  reader  a  much  clearer  portrayal  of  the 
situation  than  would  be  possible  had  the  author  set  out  to  give  a 
systematic  analysis  of  conditions  instead  of  presenting  facts  and  opinions 
■2LS  they  are  at  work  in  the  labor  movement. 

One  is  particularly  impressed  by  the  personalities  that  lead  the  labor 
movement  as  portrayed  by  Mr.  Gleason,  and  to  supplement  his  own 
descriptions  the  author  makes  the  leaders  speak  for  themselves.  That 
the  special  chapters  written  by  the  various  labor  leaders  fail  to  corre- 
spond to  the  descriptions  given  of  them  is  only  reasonable,  but  in  present- 
ing one's  moving  ideas  and  ideals  the  interpreter  does  well  to  step  aside 
and  let  the  subject  make  his  own  plea. 

The  reports  of  the  various  labor  conferences  appended  to  the  book 
.are  of  immense  value,  as  they  give  the  trend  of  the  labor  thought  and 
movement  in  the  clearest  possible  outline  and  without  them  the  book 
would  be  incomplete  or  even  misleading. 

Mr.  Gleason  has  a  keen  eye  for  essentials  and  a  sense  of  perspective 
that  makes  this  seemingly  bulky  volume  teem  with  human  interest, 
without  losing  sight  of  the  fact  that  nothing  is  final  and  that  all  is  still 
in  a  formative  and  progressive  stage.  There  are  no  positive  predictions, 
although  we  are  not  left  in  the  dark  as  to  the  direction  in  which  things 
are  moving.  There  is  no  effort  to  give  the  impression  that  the  masses 
of  English  labor  are  more  intelligent  or  farseeing  than  American  labor; 
but  that  leadership  is  evidently  more  keenly  alive  to  the  possibilities  of 


638  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

economic  reconstruction  and  the  mass  of  workers  is  more  willing  to  listen 
to  those  whose  social  ideals  are  grounded  in  the  more  complex  philosophy 
of  the  state  than  is  generally  conceded  to  the  ordinary  labor  leader  in 
this  country  is  made  clear. 

Mr.  Gleason's  style  is  vitalized  by  a  deep  interest  in  his  subject  and 
his  direct  contact  with  the  movement  and  the  leaders  with  whom  he 
deals.  A  short  chapter  on  old  England  is  of  particular  interest  because 
of  its  quaint  charm  and  its  masterful  description  of  peaceful  England 
in  contrast  with  the  contending  forces  of  labor  and  capital. 

No  one  interested  in  the  labor  movement  can  afford  to  forego  the 
advantage  of  examining  this  work.  The  English  labor  program  that 
came  into  being  during  the  war  and  which  attracted  so  much  attention 
in  the  United  States  was  indicative  of  the  influence  that  the  labor  move- 
ment abroad  must  have  upon  conditions  in  this  country.  Whatever 
the  future  of  the  movement  in  England,  it  is  bound  to  have  its  efifect 
upon  American  labor. 

Carol  Aronovici 

Belvedere,  Cal. 


Readings  in  Rural  Sociology.  By  John  Phelan.  New  York: 
The  Macmillan  Co.,  1920.     Pp.  xiv+632.     $4.00. 

In  a  volume  of  more  than  six  hundred  pages  the  author  has  brought 
together  under  twenty  chapter  headings  almost  150  brief  articles, 
addresses,  and  excerpts  or  abridgments  from  writings  which  bear  upon 
this  subject.  The  first  four  chapters  furnish  an  excellent  historical 
perspective  for  an  understanding  of  present-day  rural  problems.  Then 
follow  chapters  devoted  to  the  various  aspects  of  the  rural  life  of  today. 
The  place  of  farming  in  our  national  life,  the  economic,  the  mental  and 
moral,  the  health  and  the  recreational  aspects  of  country  life,  transporta- 
tion, police  protection,  the  home,  the  school,  miscellaneous  educational 
agencies,  the  church,  the  village,  the  rural  survey,  rural  organization, 
rural  leadership,  and  rural  sociology  suggest  the  plan  of  organization 
under  which  this  vast  amount  of  material  has  been  brought  together. 

Those  who  use  this  volume  will  wish  that  the  author  had  arranged 
the  chapters  in  a  dififerent  order,  or,  better  still,  that  he  had  grouped 
them  under  larger  divisional  headings.  The  first  four  chapters  are 
largely  historical;  chapters  v,  vi,  x,  and  xviii  treat  of  the  various  eco- 
nomic aspects  of  rural  life;  chapters  vii,  xi,  and  xv  have  to  do  with 
health,  recreation,  and  education;  while  the  remaining  chapters  deal 
with  the  important  social  issues.      Some  five  or  six  well-chosen  divisional 


REVIEWS  639 

titles  would  no  doubt  have  had  some  influence  on  the  particular  selec- 
tions to  be  included  in  the  book.  As  one  runs  through  the  titles,  how- 
ever, he  finds  little  that  even  the  busy  student  would  wish  to 
exclude. 

A  second  criticism  which  one  is  tempted  to  suggest,  even  though  the 
volume  purports  to  be  only  a  book  of  readings,  is  the  absence  of  intro- 
ductory and  interpretative  discussion  by  the  author.  Nothing  in  rural 
education  and  rural  sociology  is  more  needed  just  now,  after  a  full  decade 
of  popular  enthusiasm,  and  educational,  social,  economic,  and  religious 
propaganda  in  behalf  of  rural  life,  with  the  flood  of  investigation,  re- 
search, and  legislation,  and  the  greater  flood  of  every  type  of  literature 
that  has  accompanied  the  movement,  than  a  clear  interpretation  of 
just  what  it  has  all  been  about.  In  this  connection  the  author's  prin- 
cipal contribution  is  his  chapter  and  subchapter  headings,  together  with 
well-chosen  chapter  bibliographies.  After  reading,  selecting,  and 
classifying  such  a  mass  of  material  as  the  author  must  have  handled, 
the  reader  will  regret  the  absence  of  this  feature  which  would  have  added 
a  total  of  only  twenty  or  thirty  pages  at  most. 

The  book  is  a  pioneer  attempt,  however,  to  bring  some  order  out  of 
the  chaos  of  material  in  this  field,  and  even  with  the  absence  of  the 
features  above  suggested  leaves  one  with  the  impression  that  the  rural 
problem  is  a  very  real  problem  in  American  life,  and  that  as  a  field  for 
careful  and  scientific  study  it  is  not  entirely  adrift.  One  is  pleased  to 
find  the  names  of  Thomas  Nixon  Carver,  Frederick  J.  Turner,  Booker 
T.  Washington,  Eugene  Davenport,  Charles  W.  Eliot,  Sir  Horace 
Plunkett,  James  Bryce,  and  Theodore  Roosevelt  associated  with  the 
names  of  the  few  men  who  have  made  it  their  principal  life  business  to 
mine  out  this  field  of  rural  sociology. 

The  book  has  made  available,  in  good  form,  a  valuable  body  of 
literature,  which,  previous  to  this,  no  one  person  could  hope  to  find, 
and  by  so  doing  will  add  impetus  to  the  movement  for  a  better  rural 
America.  Almost  everybody  has  read  some  portion  of  the  book  as  it 
appeared  in  magazines  or  books,  but  few  have  realized  the  amount  of 
substantial  study  that  has  been  devoted  to  the  subject.  To  this  end  the 
book  will  be  very  informing,  to  say  nothing  of  the  important  need  it 
will  fill  in  the  university  and  normal-school  classrooms  and  in  the 
hundreds  of  circulating  county  libraries  and  school  libraries  throughout 
the  country. 

J.  B.  Se.\rs 

University  of  Minnesota 


640  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

The    Woman    Who    Waits.    By    Frances    Donovan.    Boston: 
Badger,  1920.     Pp.  228.     $2.50. 

The  Woman  Who  Waits  is  an  interesting  account  of  Mrs.  Donovan's 
nine  months'  experience  as  a  waitress  in  the  restaurants  of  Chicago. 
It  is  a  book  which  at  the  same  time  that  it  provides  an  evening's  enter- 
tainment offers  a  great  deal  of  information  of  undoubted  value  to  the 
student  of  social  conditions.  The  very  readable  style  in  which  it  is 
written  adds  to  the  vividness  of  the  picture  which  Mrs.  Donovan  aims 
to  draw  and  in  no  way  detracts  from  the  scientific  worth  of  the  work. 

The  most  striking  feature  of  The  Woman  Who  Waits  is  the  intimate 
knowledge  of  all  the  details  of  the  waitress'  life  which  it  conveys  to 
the  reader.  The  process  of  getting  a  job  and  being  fired,  the  necessity 
of  "jollying  along"  the  guests  for  the  much-desired  tip,  the  making  of 
dates  with  patrons,  the  advantages  of  belonging  to  the  Waitress'  Alliance 
or  the  Waitress'  Union — these  and  other  phases  of  the  waitress'  existence 
are  described  from  a  sympathetic  point  of  view  which  lends  more  than 
a  semblance  of  reality  to  the  printed  page.  It  is  this  very  humanistic 
point  of  view  which  enables  Mrs.  Donovan  to  enter  so  completely  into 
the  joys  and  sorrows  of  her  companions  and  to  describe  them  so  vividly 
and  accurately. 

It  must  not  be  inferred,  however,  that  Mrs.  Donovan's  keenness 
for  details  and  sympathy  for  human  problems  blinds  her  to  the  more 
general  aspects  of  her  investigation.  While  she  understands  the  wait- 
ress' love  of  pretty  clothes,  her  vulgar  conversation,  and  the  freedom 
of  her  sex  relationships,  she  also  evaluates  these  from  the  social  view- 
point. She  concludes  that  the  waitress  is  typical  of  the  great  mass 
of  women  wage-earners  who,  in  spite  of  their  lack  of  educational  advan- 
tages, etc.,  are  becoming  an  increasingly  important  factor  in  shaping 
the  affairs  of  society.  Their  economic  independence  has  brought  them 
an  equality  with  men  which  has  given  them  the  same  freedom  even  in 
the  sphere  of  sex  relationships.  In  addition,  it  has  brought  them  new 
responsibilities  which  with  the  aid  of  their  organizations  they  are 
training  themselves  to  meet. 

Phyllis  Blanchard 

New  York  City  

Wealth  From  Waste:   Elimination  of  Waste  a  World  Problem.     By 
Henry  J.  Spooner.     London:   George  Routeledge  and  Sons, 
1918.     Pp.  xvH-316.    $2.50. 
The  engineering  profession  has  long  been  impatient  with  the  exces- 
sive wastes  of  contemporary  social  conditions.     Since  the  Great  War, 


REVIEWS  641 

especially,  appeals  for  saner  economy  and  efficiency  have  been  meeting 
with  a  better  understanding  and  response  on  the  part  of  the  public — 
in  spite  of  certain  tendencies  to  the  contrary  during  the  past  year. 

Mr.  Spooner,  as  director  and  professor  of  mechanical  and  civil 
engineering  in  the  Polytechnic  School  of  Engineering  in  London,  wrote 
the  above  book  toward  the  end  of  the  war,  as  a  statement  of  existing, 
extensive,  social  wastes,  and  of  certain  known  and  tried  methods  of 
correcting  them.  He  divides  the  work  into  two  general  parts:  the 
book  proper,  and  a  glossary  giving  further  data  and  individual  instances 
of  successful  and  profitable  economies.  In  the  first  chapter  he  says: 
"We  are  beginning  to  realize  that  wicked  waste  is  occurring  everywhere, 
far  and  wide;  waste  of  money,  waste  of  food,  waste  of  materials,  labor, 
fuel,  energy  and  time,  waste  of  human  strength  and  thought,  waste 
of  health  and  waste  of  life  itself."  These  are  the  main  points  he  con- 
siders. His  spirit  is  practical,  straightforward;  his  style  is  interesting. 
He  says  (p.  5),  ''The  doctrine  of  waste-prevention  should  be  handled 
in  a  broad  spirit,  for  there  are  justifiable  wastes  and  dangerous 
economies" — the  implied  standard  of  proper  economy  being  the  need 
of  society.  On  this  point,  however,  Mr.  Spooner  does  not  explain  his 
contradictory  term  "justifiable  wastes,"  nor  does  he  attempt  to  define 
exactly  what,  theoretically,  must  be  meant  by  waste,  contenting  him- 
self with  the  consideration  of  concrete  conditions  which  would  be 
commonly  recognized  as  wasteful.  But  while  he  does  not  enter  upon 
any  extended  philosophy  of  waste,  he  gives  us  a  searching,  intelligent, 
and  authoritative  statement  of  admittedly  wasteful  conditions,  chiefly 
in  Great  Britain,  and  particularly  in  the  basic  interests  of  sustenance 
and  production.  He  does  not  examine  thoroughly  the  higher  pro- 
fessional fields  of  education,  religion,  government,  art,  etc.,  touching 
upon  them  rather  incidentally. 

Lord  Leverhulme,  the  "enlightened  employer,"  writes  the  foreword. 

Some  of  the  author's  conclusions  are  interesting.  He  says  (p.  90) 
the  English  people  were  spending  as  a  nation  for  their  living  in  normal 
times  before  the  war  an  equivalent  of  about  $10,000,000,000  a  year; 
they  were  wasting  outright  (or  culpably  failing  to  secure)  about 
$3,000,000,000,  in  which,  as  waste,  he  reckons  one-half  of  the  nation's 
annual  drink  bill,  or  $400,000,000.  (The  whole  of  it  is  now,  perhaps, 
over  $1,000,000,000,  but  he  says  "there  are  welcome  signs  that  the 
drink  evil  is  on  the  wane.")  Mr.  Spooner  says  (p.  11)  that  adultera- 
tions of  food  and  other  goods  exist  to  a  serious  extent  and  are  appar- 
ently increasing.     In  chapter  viii  he  enumerates  specific  methods  of 


642  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

adulteration.  The  uses  of  coal  and  land  are  extensively  and  interest- 
ingly treated  with  figures  to  show  need  of  conservation.  In  connection 
with  the  question  of  fatigue  and  general  industrial  efl&ciency  he  advo- 
cates a  continued  shortening  of  the  work-day  (p.  71): 

We  may  well  hope  that,  with  a  general  adoption  of  shorter  hours,  with 
improved  methods  of  working,  and  with  restricted  output,  the  time  will  not 
be  far  distant  when  still  further  reductions  in  the  working-hours  will  be  pos- 
sible, until  the  six-hour  day  is  reached — with  all  its  beneficial  advantages — 
that  has  been  so  powerfully  advocated  by  Lord  Leverhulme  as  an  ideal. 

The  book  is  important,  scholarly,  hopeful,  and  well  worth  serious 
consideration  by  all  citizens  of  America  as  well  as  of  Britain. 

C.  J.  BUSHXELL 
Toledo  U^rrv'ERSITY 


The  Limits  of  Socialism.     By  O.  Fred  Boucke.     New  York:  The 
Macmillan  Co.,  1920.     Pp.  256.     $1.50. 

The  interesting  thing  about  this  book  is  to  see  a  professor  of  economics 
advocate  a  knowledge  of  biology,  psychology,  philosophy,  and  sociology 
as  necessary  to  really  understand  an  economic  theory  and  the  social 
process. 

The  broadening  vision  of  the  late  Carleton  H.  Parker  and  Robert  F. 
Hoxie  is  getting  adherents  and  the  unity  of  the  social  sciences  is  steadily 
being  recognized  more  widely. 

The  author's  grasp  of  psychology  is  rather  inadequate  as  he  fails  to 
mention  or  use  social  psychology  and  labors  over  his  presentation  un- 
necessarily. The  book  nearest  like  the  present  one  is  Roy  W.  Sellars' 
The  Next  Step  in  Democracy  written  some  four  years  ago  by  a  professor 
of  philosophy.  Sellars'  book  is  more  thoroughly  unified,  his  use  of  the 
auxiliary  sciences  is  less  paraded,  and  the  whole  presentation  is  smoother. 

However,  it  is  very  refreshing  to  have  an  economist  acknowledge 
that  a  logical  refutation  of  Marxian  economic  theories  by  no  means  dis- 
poses of  the  socialist  movement. 

Victor  E.  Helleberg 

Lawrence,  Kan.  

America  and  the  New  Era.     By  E.  M.  Friedman,  Editor.     New 
York:  E.  P.  Button  &  Co.,  1920.     Pp.  xxx+500.     $6.00. 
This  comprehensive  volume — too  comprehensive,  if  the  reader  is 
critical — presents  a  symposium  on  social  reconstruction  that  is  a  com- 
panion to  America?i  Problems  oj  Reconstruction,  Labor  and  Reconstruction , 


REVIEWS  643 

and  International  Commerce  and  Reconstruction,  by  the  same  editor. 
These  are  economic  and  financial  in  emphasis;  the  new  compilation  is 
sociological  in  tone. 

In  recognition  of  the  truth  that  the  war  influence  extended  beyond 
the  economic  superstructure  of  modern  society  and  made  necessary  a 
revaluation  of  the  fundamental  values  of  our  national  life,  the  sym- 
posium was  arranged  to  crystallize  thought  on  broader  issues.  The 
problems  of  political  and  social  adjustment,  and  of  the  conservation  of 
human  resources,  are  discussed  "for  the  purpose  of  intelligently  con- 
trolling social  forces." 

The  faults  of  this  "reconstruction"  adventure  in  the  sociological  field 
are  perhaps  inevitable — lengthiness,  wide  diversity  of  material,  extreme 
unevenness,  and  contradiction  in  viewpoint.  The  effort  at  synthesis  is 
at  times  bewildering.  For  instance,  it  is  difficult  to  see  how  the  papers 
in  Part  II  quite  fit  into  the  heading  "Social  Progress  versus  Cycles  of 
Change."  Between  Professor  Ell  wood's  evolutionary  discussion  of  war 
and  Horace  M.  Kallen's  penetrating  and  dynamic  analysis  of  "The 
International  Mind,"  and  Professor  Hollander's  forceful  little  economic 
essay  on  "War  and  Want,"  are  sandwiched  static  and  rather  conven- 
tional articles  on  "The  International  Mind"  and  "Individualism." 

Again,  in  Part  IV,  on  "The  New  Nationalism,"  the  reader — after 
following  with  interest  Dr.  Fitzpatrick's  statement  of  the  need  for  effec- 
tive "Public  Administration"  and  Professor  West's  realistic  discussion  of 
"The  Constitution  and  PoHtical  Parties"  (ending  with  the  daring  plea 
for  a  cabinet  chosen  from  and  functioning  in  Congress) — drifts  help- 
lessly into  the  fogs  of  "The  American  Spirit"  and  "The  Spiritual  Tra- 
dition in  American  Life,"  to  be  saved,  it  is  true,  though  almost  too  late,  by 
the  intellectual  clarity  of  Edward  S.  Ames's  "Religion  in  the  New  Age." 
A  few  of  the  writers,  to  say  the  least,  go  far  toward  violating  Herbert 
Hoover's  splendid  dictum  of  the  Foreword:  "Terms  must  not  be  con- 
fused with  reahties,  or  labels  with  conditions.  We  must  face  concrete 
facts,  rather  than  attempt  to  apply  doctrinaire  generalizations." 

Part  III,  on  "Economic  Aspects  of  Social  Problems,"  is  most  tangible 
and  constructive,  containing,  as  it  does.  Professor  Ely's  "An  American 
Land  Policy"  and  Professor  Hibbard's  "The  Drift  Toward  the  City," 
which  give  reassuring  scientific  treatment  of  the  agricultural  situation 
and  serve  to  counteract  the  effects  of  much  groundless  alarmism.  Here 
also  are  Frederick  C.  Howe's  informed  discussion  on  "The  Immigrant 
and  American"  and  Mary  Van  Kleek's  competent  survey  of  "Women 
in  Industry." 


644  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

Part  V,  "The  Conservation  of  Human  Resources,"  which  comprises 
about  two-fifths  of  this  large  volume,  should  undoubtedly  have  received 
separate  publication,  in  justice  to  the  valuable  material  that  it  contains. 
Certainly  the  editor  did  not  plan  merely  a  reference  volume,  but  rather 
a  readable  and  popular  book.  And  there  are  limits  to  the  powers  of 
attention  and  concentration,  even  of  the  trained  mind!  In  the  section 
are  able  monographs,  written  by  distinguished  specialists,  on  "  Heredity," 
"Child  Welfare,"  "Vocational  Education,"  "Health,"  "Food,"  "In- 
dustrial Hygiene,"  "Delinquency  and  Crime,"  "Venereal  Disease," 
"  Recreation  and  Play,"  and  "  Mental  Hygiene."  All  are  timely,  penned 
in  the  light  of  the  war  and  in  terms  of  reconstruction  policy. 

The  editor's  two  introductory  chapters  are  quite  adequate,  if  mani- 
fold and  in  places  labored.  Mr.  Friedman  is  to  be  admired  for  his 
tireless  work  of  selection  and  integration  in  so  vast  a  field.  Herbert 
Hoover's  Foreword,  as  brilliant  a  little  gem  as  the  whole  volume  con- 
tains, reveals  this  great  American  as  a  true  liberal  and  an  exceedingly 
well-balanced  social  scientist. 

Francis  Tyson 

University  of  Pittsburgh 


A  Philosophy  of  Play.  By  Luther  Halsey  Gulick.  New  York: 
Charles  Scribner's  Sons,  1920.     Pp.  291.     $1.60. 

This  book  was  posthumously  published  from  a  manuscript  that  was 
practically  completed  before  the  death  of  Dr.  Gulick.  Miss  Anna  L. 
von  der  Osten  who  had  assisted  him  in  the  preparation  of  the  manu- 
script had  charge  of  the  editing. 

In  a  brief  foreword,  Joseph  Lee  refers  to  it  as  the  "last  message  of 
the  master,"  to  those  interested  in  the  recreation  movement,  and  as  a 
"legacy  of  an  American  pioneer  in  the  vitally  important  field  of  edu- 
cation." Mr.  Lee  probably  does  not  overestimate  the  place  that  Dr. 
Gulick  occupied  in  the  field  of  public  recreation.  He  was  in  fact  a 
pioneer  in  a  field  that  even  yet  has  extremely  few  scientific  students. 
And  his  actual  accomplishments  as  a  practical  leader  and  teacher  of  play 
gave  him  a  place  of  authority  among  recreation  workers. 

The  book  is  the  first  whole  volume  of  play  theory  published  in 
America,  and  the  most  important  published  anywhere  since  the  volumes 
of  Groos  on  The  Play  of  Animals  and  The  Play  of  Man.  It  comes  as  a 
welcome  boon  to  a  field  extremely  lacking  in  theoretical  foundation. 
The  recreation  movement  of  the  past  quarter-century  has  been  chiefly 
an  elaboration  of  a  few  popular  ideas  on  the  need  for  more  play  space 
and  for  the  need  for  supervision  of  play.    There  has  been  no  consistent 


EJEVIEWS  645 

body  of  principles,  and  in  fact  no  real  understanding  of  the  physical  and 
mental  processes  involved  in  play. 

This  small  volume  of  Dr.  Gulick's  does  not  attempt  to  supply  this 
entire  want.  The  writer  was  not  equipped  for  technical  psychological 
or  pedagogical  or  sociological  analysis.  He  is  guilty,  as  Mr.  Lee  points 
out  in  the  Foreword,  of  misinterpreting  the  foundation  of  Frobel's  edu- 
cational methods.  His  remark  (p.  xiii)  that  "the  origin  and  develop- 
ment of  gangs  and  team  games  among  boys  similarly  present  facts  that 
do  not  seem  to  harmonize  with  the  views  of  contemporary  sociologists," 
also  leads  one  to  wonder  what  modern  sociological  writings  he  had  read 
or  not  read.  He  does  express  a  preference  for  the  theories  of  Gum- 
plowitz.  In  the  chapter  on  the  "Play  of  Animals"  (p.  Ill)  he  says  that 
"it  is  also  evident  that  tradition  and  example  are  necessary  parts  of 
animal  play."  The  ascribing  of  tradition  to  animal  society  is  based  upon 
a  misconception  of  animal  psychology,  and  the  evidence  he  cites  for  the 
notion  that  animals  are  taught  how  to  play  and  hunt  and  fight  is  far 
from  convincing. 

In  spite  of  these  limitations  on  his  technical  equipment,  he  has  given 
us  the  most  complete  treatment  we  yet  have  of  the  psychic  foundations 
of  play  and  the  principles  which  should  guide  its  organization  and 
direction.  What  he  lacked  in  technical  equipment  for  theoretical  dis- 
cussion he  more  than  made  up  in  the  breadth  of  his  observation  of  actual 
play  activities  and  in  the  sanity  of  judgment  and  keenness  of  insight 
that  he  brought  to  this  observation.  The  book  is  the  fruit  of  twenty 
years  of  careful  observation. 

The  fundamental  point  of  view  maintained  throughout  is  the  instinc- 
tive theory  of  Groos,  but  he  does  not  carry  as  far  as  did  Groos  the  notion 
that  play  in  children  or  animals  is  the  practice  of  instincts  for  the  pur- 
pose of  perfecting  their  later  expression.  He  emphasizes  rather  the 
survival  value,  for  life  in  the  earlier  history  of  the  race,  of  the  instincts 
that  are  active  in  play,  and  the  fundamental  necessity  for  our  giving 
these  instincts  opportunity  for  an  expression  that  is  adapted  to  modern 
conditions.  He  did  not  seem  to  be  aware  that  his  point,  that  tradition 
molds  the  form  of  play  while  instinct  drives  it,  is  a  fundamental  of 
modern  sociological  thought.  He  records  some  excellent  examples  of 
this  complementary  relation  of  instinct  and  tradition. 

The  final  chapters,  on  the  practical  aspects  of  provision  for  play  and 
control  and  utilization  of  the  instinctive  tendencies  for  social  welfare, 
contain  no  new  theory  but  are  excellently  put  and  sanely  proportioned. 

Cecil  C.  North 
Ohio  State  Unfversity 


646  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

The  Social  Evolution  of  Religion.    By  George  Willis  Cooke. 
Boston:  The  Stratford  Co.,  1920.     Pp.  xxiv+416.     $3.50. 

This  book  is  devoted  mainly  to  the  proposition  that  all  of  the  dif- 
ferent religions  are  products  of  social  evolution,  but  that  religion  is  a 
permanent  and  essential  part  of  the  life  of  humanity.  Similarly  one 
may  say  that  all  languages  are  products  of  social  evolution,  but  com- 
munication is  an  essential  element  of  human  life,  or  that  all  political 
institutions  are  products  of  social  evolution  but  that  government,  as 
the  methodical  organization  of  life,  is  indispensable.  The  secondary 
proposition  of  the  book  is  that  every  religion  which  developed  in  pre- 
scientific  times  has  a  mythology,  that  these  various  mythologies  show 
striking  resemblances,  and  that  to  this  statement  Christianity  is  no 
exception. 

The  statement  that  every  religion  developed  in  prescientific  ages 
is  provided  with  a  mythology,  says  the  author,  applies  not  only  to  the 
folklore  of  the  Hebrew  Old  Testament  but  also  to  the  incarnation, 
virgin  birth,  and  resurrection  of  Christ.  To  attribute  supernatural 
birth  to  the  most  exalted  personages,  he  says,  was  as  common  as  is 
now  the  attribution  of  genius.  In  the  ancient  world  the  idea  "was 
one  of  daily  occurrence  as  an  interpretation  of  every  form  of  genius 
and  authority."  And  "the  conception  of  incarnation  is  nearly,  if 
not  quite,  as  widespread  as  that  of  virgin  birth."  "The  idea  of  incar- 
nation was  introduced  into  Christianity  because  it  was  essentially 
known  to  all  the  religions  to  be  found  in  the  civilized  world  when 
Christianity  came  into  existence"  (p.  265).  G.  Stanley  Hall  is  quoted 
as  presenting  evidence  to  indicate  "that  there  would  have  been  no 
Christian  doctrine  of  the  resurrection  had  not  this  doctrine  had  a  large 
place  in  earUer  religions."  And  the  author  refers,  for  example,  to  the 
resurrection  in  Egyptian  mythology  and  quotes  the  Egyptian  saying, 
"As  surely  as  Osiris  lives  I  shall  live." 

"The  doctrine  of  atonement  or  expiation  is  also  found  in  all  religions 
which  have  passed  beyond  the  most  primitive  stages  of  development." 
"Even  such  a  people  as  the  Iroquois  believed  in  a  cosmic  being  who 
gave  his  own  life  that  the  world  might  come  into  existence,  and  that 
his  life  might  nourish  the  life  of  man."  "The  Christian  idea  of  it  is 
somewhat  more  advanced  than  those  which  preceded  it  and  it  is  itself 
undergoing  a  rapid  process  of  change."  "The  god  or  gods  demanding 
such  reconciliation  are  reflections  of  human  kings,  who  make  similar 
demands."  And  the  resulting  standard  of  salvation  is  "metaphysical 
and  not  practical."     What  characterizes  it  is  "disregard  for  human 


REVIEWS  647 

welfare  and  an  absence  of  the  humanitarian  spirit."  Such  "holiness  is 
selfishness  in  disguise." 

Throughout  the  book  emphasis  is  placed  upon  the  character  of 
religion  as  a  social  evolution  in  distinction  from  the  more  familiar 
emphasis  upon  the  creative  work  of  individual  religious  leaders.  This 
is  illustrated  by  the  chapter  headings:  (i)  "The  Social  Transmission 
of  Human  Experience";  (ii)  "The  Creative  Genius  of  Social  Man"; 
(iii)  "Communal  and  Tribal  Religion";  (iv)  "Feudal  Religion"; 
(v)  "National  Religion";  (vi)  "International  Religion";  (vii)  "Uni- 
versal Religion";    (viii)  "Religion  as  Cosmic  and  Human  Motive." 

Folk  religions  in  their  older  forms,  says  the  author,  were  always 
conservative,  reactionary,  and  faced  toward  the  past.  In  its  newer 
manifestations  religion  is  becoming  forward-looking  and  progressive. 
"  Religion  is  becoming  emancipated  from  its  superstitions,  its  credulities 
and  its  orthodoxies."  Religion  in  the  recent  past  has  become  indi- 
vidualistic and  lost  its  capacity  to  direct  and  stimulate  the  communal 
or  the  national  life.  Indeed,  from  the  communal  life,  the  life  of  marts 
and  of  legislatures,  the  broader  ethical  conceptions  and  the  primary 
principles  of  justice  appear  largely  to  have  been  banished,  except  as  a 
hypocritical  pretense,  and  there  is  the  broadest  possible  contrast  between 
the  justice  of  the  New  Testament  and  the  teaching  of  the  creeds  and 
theologists.  The  author  further  believes  that  we  are  in  a  period  of 
transition  in  which  the  word  religion  will  not  stand  primarily  for  a  body 
of  beliefs  which  have  become  largely  untenable  in  our  age,  but  rather 
for  the  universal  principles  of  religiousness  and  aspirations  for  the 
continuing  life  of  man. 

In  his  last  chapter  the  author  supplements  and  interprets  his  own 
conception  by  quoting  the  views  of  numerous  modern  illuminati  includ- 
ing, among  others,  Edward  Caird,  William  James,  Henry  Bosanquet, 
H.  G.  Wells,  Francis  Younghusband,  Emile  Durkheim,  and  Eugenio 
Rignano. 

More  and  more  it  is  borne  in  upon  the  minds  of  instructed  men  that 
the  absorption  of  religion  in  the  salvation  of  the  individual  soul  in 
another  world  than  this  is  a  catastrophe.  The  task  of  rescuing  religion 
from  neglect  by  men  who  have  been  touched  by  the  scientific  spirit 
and  restoring  it  to  a  commanding  place  as  the  guide  and  inspiration 
of  life  is  a  double  one:  first,  that  of  rescuing  it  from  superstition  or 
supernaturalism  and  incredibility;  and  second,  the  task  of  rescuing 
it  from  individualism  and  making  it  messianic.  The  religion  that  will 
furnish  an  adjustment  of  all  life's  powers,  and  inspiration,  guidance, 


648  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

and  joy,  that  will  deliver  men  from  boredom  and  degeneracy  and 
summon  a  devotion  like  that  of  Christ,  will  be  inspired  by  aspiration 
to  realize  the  unfulfilled  possibilities  of  good  in  the  continuing  life  of 
mankind.  Other  men  will  give  their  lives  as  Christ  gave  his  only 
because  they  "so  love  the  world."  Only  in  thus  giving  life  will  they 
find  it.  To  discard  hypocrisy,  to  live  for  genuineness,  not  so  much 
in  good  works  as  in  good  work,  to  discard  the  selfishness  of  individualism, 
and  of  party,  class,  and  nation,  to  look  upon  one's  deeds  and  character 
as  part  of  the  fulfilment  of  a  common  task,  this  alone  can  raise  us  to 
our  true  nobility  as  the  Sons  of  Man.  Universal  and  permanent  religion 
must  have  its  mainspring  in  a  purpose,  not  in  a  creed  nor  a  ritual: 
the  social  purpose  to  which  humanity  has  never  set  itself,  and  which 
must  wait  for  realization  until  it  does  become  the  common  religion  of 
right-minded  men. 

E.  C.  Hayes 
University  of  Illinois 


The  Making  of  Humanity.  By  Robert  Briffault.  New  York: 
The  Macmillan  Co.,  1919.     Pp.  371.     $4.00. 

This  is  a  remarkable  book — the  most  passionate  exposition  of  the 
intellectualist  concept  of  progress  that  we  have  in  English.  While  the 
author  dismisses  too  cavalierly  earlier  attempts  to  formulate  the  idea 
of  progress  and  while  he  admits  that  progress  is  still  a  controversial  idea, 
yet  he  asserts  with  almost  mathematical  definiteness  that  progress  is 
undeniable,  inevitable  in  fact,  even  if  we  do  not  know  the  goal.  More- 
over he  declares  the  cause  of  human  progress  from  the  very  beginning 
to  be  "rational  thought." 

His  argument  proceeds  somewhat  as  follows:  Rational  thought  is 
man's  means  of  adaptation;  even  though  not  always  or  often  purposive, 
frequently  only  shown  in  the  method  of  trial  and  error,  yet  in  the  long 
run  rationality  prevails  and  truth  triumphs.  Reason  is  necessarily 
progressive  because  inexorably  logical.  Human  society  is  essentially 
psychological  and  improvements  pass  through  the  social  heredity  as 
ideas,  not  through  germinal  changes.  Progress  along  rational  lines  is 
a  battle  against  the  hindrances  set  up  by  non-rational  custom-thought 
and  power-thought.  These  fetters  are  broken  sometimes  by  wise  heads 
or  by  "dim  horse  sdnse  of  the  mob,"  but  usually  they  are  broken  in  only 
two  ways:  by  material  discovery  and  by  cross-fertilization  of  culture. 
Progress  is  therefore  exceptional  and  is  never  possible  in  an  isolated 
people  or  a  social  class;   but  since  it  is  always  present  it  is  therefore  the 


REVIEWS  649 

rule!  Oriental  history  illustrates  how  religious  power- thought  hindered 
the  rise  and  flowering  of  an  intellectual  impulse.  In  a  brilliant  but 
somewhat  superficial  chapter  the  author  shows  how  Greece  broke  this 
vicious  spell.  Later  he  analyzes  the  contribution  of  Rome  and  describes 
how  Rome  succumbed  to  oriental  religion  and  her  own  fallacies;  how 
Byzantium  only  added  to  the  barbarian  wreckage  and  how  civilization 
was  rekindled  by  the  Saracens.  One  of  the  most  brilliant  sections  in  the 
book  is  the  analysis  of  power-thought;  another  is  an  eloquent  apologetic 
for  Moslem  civilization.  Scarcely  less  so  is  the  acid  criticism  of  the  so- 
called  Renaissance,  which  is  shown  to  be  a  distinct  setback. 

The  author  distinguishes  four  broad  stages  in  human  evolution. 
First,  the  period  of  tribal  or  custom-thought.  Second,  the  period  of 
great  oriental  civilization  wholly  dominated  by  theocratic  power-thought. 
Third,  the  Greek  liberation  from  custom-  and  power-thought.  Fourth, 
the  age  in  which  we  live.  Only  rational  thought,  he  argues,  could  have 
made  development  and  progress  possible  out  of  the  welter  of  conflicting 
power  and  barbarities  of  the  last  five  hundred  years  of  European  history ; 
just  as  only  rational  thought  could  break  the  crust  of  oriental  theocracy. 
The  key  to  this  development  may  be  summarized  as  a  compound  of 
Arab  culture,  Protestantism,  critical  philosophy,  and  physical  science 
as  summed  up  in  the  French  Revolution. 

The  author  meets  squarely  the  two  inevitable  criticisms  of  the 
intellectualist  theory.  First,  he  argues  that  decadence  or  corruption 
such  as  obtained  in  Rome  and  in  the  Renaissance  is  not  the  result  of 
intellectual  culture  but  is  the  effect  of  power  or  is  itself  not  genuine. 
Second,  he  contends  that  intellectual  development  means  moral  develop- 
ment. Progress  is  ethical,  for  it  concerns  humanity;  and  moral  con- 
siderations are  paramount  with  the  idea  of  humanity  since  the  moral 
law  is  the  law  of  nature.  Moral  nature  does  progress  and  its  progress 
is  directly  associated  with  diffusion  of  rational  thought  and  is  the  direct 
outcome  of  it.  The  essence  of  moral  progress  is  a  refinement  of  the  idea 
of  justice;  therefore,  while  democracy  is  the  clumsiest  and  most  in- 
efl&cient  form  of  government,  it  is  the  most  moral  because  the  most 
just.  Since  morality,  the  mores,  rests  upon  opinions  and  not  abstract 
ethics,  it  is  essential  for  moral  progress  that  opinion  be  cleared  by  rational 
thought.  Hence  the  author's  emphasis  upon  social  ethics  rather  than 
personal  righteousness  as  a  moral  dynamic.  The  main  body  of  the 
book  closes  with  the  new  categorical  imperative  in  these  words:  "A 
new  ethical  sense,  the  true  and  natural  ethical  spirit  whose  vaguely 
conscious  operation  has  created  mankind,  is  inevitably  developing.     To 


650  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

be  with  the  forces  of  human  growth,  to  be  truly  a  living  part,  and 
not  a  mere  dead  excretion,  of  the  creative  impulse  of  the  race,  that  is 
the  obligation  which  if  we  have  indeed  apprehended  our  real  relation, 
is  inevitably  laid  upon  us."  This  categorical  imperative  has  not  yet 
been  attained,  for  specific  human  evolution  has  only  just  begun.  We 
can  control  and  direct  this  evolution  by  organizing  the  "reproductive 
mechanism";  this  is  not  education  as  it  is  now  generally  practiced,  but 
the  imparting  of  rational  thought  by  whatsoever  means  and  methods, 
by  building  up  the  mental  equipment  of  humanity.  And  it  is  under- 
stood that  this  rational  thought  is  primarily  critical  and  not  con- 
structive. 

While  accepting  in  general  the  magnificent  gesture  of  the  book,  it  is 
perfectly  possible  to  question  some  of  its  details.  The  reviewer  is  in 
doubt,  for  example,  as  to  what  is  absolute  social  right  and  justice  of  which 
the  author  makes  so  much.  There  seems  to  be  nothing  absolute  about 
it  except  its  general  direction.  Again,  we  cannot  but  feel  that  it  is  an 
exaggeration  to  assert  that  the  great  modern  vice  is  the  toleration  of  all 
opinions  as  Equally  good  and  valid.  Our  recent  war  experience  and  the 
social  commotions  of  a  century  hardly  bear  out  this  criticism.  Exag- 
gerated also  is  the  author's  dogmatic  insistence  that  there  has  been  no 
evolution  in  sexual  morality.  This  would  seem  to  be  a  denial  of  his 
own  thesis. 

The  author  makes  little  parade  of  scholarship,  he  offers  the  reader 
no  bibliography,  very  few  footnotes,  and  no  index.  Written  largely  in 
the  trenches  of  Gallipoli  and  France  it  is  nevertheless  not  slapdash,  but 
the  summation  of  long  previous  research.  His  style  is  lyric,  verging 
toward  purple  in  spots.  His  chapter  titles  are  vivid;  for  ex- 
ample, "The  Discovery  of  Man,"  "Morals  as  Comfort,"  "Morals  on 
the  March,"  "The  Hopefulness  of  Pessimism."  He  gives  no  hint  as 
to  his  own  personality,  yet  he  shows  unmistakably  the  influence  of  Comte, 
in  his  intellectualism,  but  is  strong  where  Comte  was  weakest,  namely 
in  historical  interpretation.  This  book  is  to  be  welcomed  as  another 
straw  indicating  how  the  problem  of  progress  is  commanding  the  atten- 
tion of  the  world  of  scholarship  and  statesmanship,  particularly  since 
the  world-war.  It  is  moreover  a  convincing  proof  that  scholarship  need 
not  be  dull,  for  as  a  matter  of  fact  it  has  all  the  verve  and  imaginative 
thrill  of  high  romance. 

Arthur  J.  Todd 
Chicago 


REVIEWS  651 

The  Principles  of  Sociology.  By  Edward  Alsworth  Ross.  New 
York:  The  Century  Co.,  1920.     Pp.  xviii  +  708.    $4.00. 

The  following  observations  are  supplementary  to  a  review  of  this 
work  published  by  Dr.  Small  in  the  July  number  of  the  Journal.  Pro- 
fessor Ross's  book,  so  vivid  and  epigrammatic  in  style,  so  mature  in 
its  conclusions,  so  brilliant,  so  interesting,  so  original,  must  appeal  to 
sociologists  everywhere,  as  well  those  who  study  social  structures  as 
those  who  study  social  forces  and  processes.  In  this  seven-hundred- 
page  treatise,  however,  the  author  scarcely  touches  on  anthropological 
topics,  except  in  the  chapters  on  the  "Race  Factor"  and  the  "Influence 
of  the  Geographic  Environment."  If  there  is  little  anthropology  in 
the  volume,  there  is  equally  little  history,  i.e.,  historical  summation 
setting  forth  the  actual  line  of  development  followed  by  some  custom, 
belief,  or  institution.  Professor  Ross,  to  be  sure,  has  entire  right  to  be 
more  interested  in  present  things  than  in  past  things;  his  work  would 
not  be  so  uniquely  valuable  if  it  were  not  so  strictly  "up-to-date."  But 
no  one  must  expect  to  find  in  it  any  such  detailed  exposition  of  the 
genesis  and  historical  development  of  society  as  is  contained  in  Spencer's 
three  volumes  or  in  Professor  Gidding's  Principles. 

There  are  many  opportunities  for  expansion  along  anthropological 
lines,  in  case  Professor  Ross  decides  to  add  to  the  bulk  of  his  book  in 
future  editions.  The  two  chapters  above  noted  are  very  brief  and 
sketchy;  yet  it  would  be  hard  to  mention  any  others  equally  important 
for  the  right  understanding  of  human  society.  Especially  does  this 
seem  true  of  racial  subjects,  which  are  likely  to  assume  an  ever  larger 
place  among  contemporary  questions.  Very  much  more  might  be  said, 
also,  on  the  geographic  background  of  social  life,  particularly  to  show 
how  occupations  and  customs  are  afifected  by  environmental  conditions. 
A  wide  field  of  inquiry  upon  which  Professor  Ross  does  not  enter  is  that 
of  culture — criteria,  classification,  transmission,  and  development. 
Anthropologists  just  now  seem  to  be  more  interested  in  this  subject  than 
in  anything  else,  to  judge  from  the  stream  of  discussion  in  technical 
journals  and  from  recent  books  by  Professor  Elliott  Smith,  Dr.  W.  H.  R. 
Rivers,  Dr.  R.  H.  Lowie,  and  others.  Some  topics  which  might  profit- 
ably be  expanded  include:  the  discussion  of  the  roots  of  the  religious 
interest  (pp.  54-55);  social  grouping  (pp.  77-78);  suicide  (pp.  104-15), 
to  present  the  evidence  from  primitive  society;  the  r6le  of  the  festival 
(pp.  398-400),  about  which  sociologists  have  had  far  too  little  to  say; 
and  the  origin  of  the  state  (pp.  617-19). 


652  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

It  may  also  be  worth  while  to  note  here  certain  points  which  appear 
open  to  anthropological  criticism.  Professor  Ross  (pp.  59  ff.)  uses  the 
word  "race"  far  too  loosely,  applying  it  now  to  the  primary  divisions 
of  mankind,  now  to  peoples,  such  as  Frenchmen,  Germans,  etc.,  and  now 
to  the  divisions  of  peoples,  such  as  North  Italians  and  South  Italians. 
Again,  does  he  not  speak  too  assuredly  (p.  60)  concerning  "veritable 
differences  in  race  mind"?  Compare  pages  132  f.,  where  national  char- 
acteristics of  Hindus,  Greeks,  Armenians,  and  other  peoples  are  ac- 
counted for  by  purely  social  considerations.  He  accepts  without  ques- 
tion (pp.  77,  122)  the  time-honored  theory  of  the  universal  priority  of 
maternal  kinship  over  paternal  kinship  in  the  evolution  of  the  family; 
many  anthropologists  in  good  repute  now  definitely  reject  such  a  theory. 
The  discussion  (pp.  77-78)  of  the  earliest  social  groupings  might  have 
profited  by  some  consideration  of  the  Lang-Atkinson  hypothesis  (now 
adopted  by  Mr.  H.  G.  Wells),  which  resolves  truly  "primitive"  society 
into  isolated  groups  of  females  dominated  in  each  case  by  an  old  male, 
much  as  herds  of  cattle  are  ruled.  In  the  chapter  on  the  "  Genesis  of 
Society"  (pp.  86  ff.)  the  author  has  not  sufficiently  emphasized  the 
distinction  between  the  origin  of  various  historic  societies,  concerning 
which  fairly  definite  information  is  available,  and  the  more  general 
and  more  theoretical  question  of  the  origin  of  human  society.  The 
whole  subject  of  human  gregariousness  and  association  needs  to  be 
thoroughly  treated  in  the  light  of  our  present  knowledge  of  anthropology. 

When  Professor  Ross  has  given  us  so  much,  it  is  somewhat  un- 
gracious to  dwell  on  the  lapses  and  lacunae  almost  inevitable  in  such  a 
work  of  synthesis.  The  reviewer  has  read  it  with  great  interest  and 
enjoyment,  and  he  cordially  acquiesces  in  Dr.  Small's  judgment  that  in 
this  book  sociology  "has  at  last  arrived."  He  would  also  express  his 
approval  of  Professor  Ross's  thoroughly  pragmatic  and  even  utilitarian 
point  of  view,  which  was  that  of  the  founder  of  economics  and  socialized 
ethics — Adam  Smith.  It  seems  to  the  author  of  Principles  of  Sociology, 
as  it  seemed  to  the  author  of  the  Wealth  of  Nations,  that  social  science 
should  more  and  more  influence  the  legislator,  the  reformer,  the  human- 
itarian, and  the  common  man  himself. 

HuxTON  Webster 

UNTVERSriY  OF  NEBRASKA       

Health  and  Social  Progress.    By  Rudolph  M.  Binder.    New  York: 
Prentice-Hall,  Inc.,  1920.     Pp.  xi-f295.     $3.00. 
We  have  grown  familiar  with  attempts  to  explain  history  in  terms 
of  some  one  factor  such  as  "race,"  "religion,"  and  "climate."     It 


REVIEWS  653 

has  remained  for  the  present  author,  who  is  professor  of  sociology  at 
New  York  University,  to  emphasize  health  as  the  cornerstone  of  social 
welfare.  This  he  has  done,  and  done  well,  in  this  "A  Non-Medical 
Book,  Dedicated  to  the  Medical  Profession." 

Regardless  of  the  reader's  acceptance  of  the  author's  thesis  he  will 
be  glad  to  have  so  many  interesting  and  important  facts  put  in  conven- 
ient form. 

The  volume  opens  with  a  general  discussion  of  the  relation  of 
health  to  civilization  in  which  the  conclusion  is  reached  that  inasmuch  as 
"progress  is  possible  only  with  a  surplus  of  vitality  over  the  immediately 
necessary  activities  of  Ufe, "  we  may  state  as  a  law  of  general  develop- 
ment: "Individuals  and  societies  develop  in  proportion  to  their  growth 
in  self-reliance;  and  this  depends  upon  their  abiUty  to  attain  health  with 
the  resultant  confidence  in  their  ability  to  control  nature  and  their  own 
destiny." 

Then  follows  "Specific  Cases  of  Health  in  Relation  to  Society," 
in  which  ancient  Greece,  Rome,  and  the  Tropics  are  considered.  Under 
the  caption  "Health  and  World-Progress"  the  author  marshals  his  facts 
to  show  the  necessity  of  attaining  and  maintaining  health  if  civilization 
is  to  progress.  In  the  last  chapter,  "  Results  and  Prospects, "  the  author 
describes  the  health  program  of  The  United  Fruit  Company  and  the 
Rockefeller  Sanitary  Commission. 

While  all  students  have  glimpsed  the  importance  of  health  Dr.  Binder 

has  done  a  real  service  in  stressing  it  and  the  volume  will  repay  careful 

reading. 

Carl  Kelsey 

University  of  Pennsylvania 


The  College  and  the  New  America.  By  Jay  William  Hudson, 
Ph.D.  New  York:  D.  Appleton  and  Company,  1920. 
Pp.  xi+202.     $2.00. 

This  book  is  a  trumpet  call  to  college  and  university  teachers  to 
recognize  more  fully  their  social  obUgations;  and,  as  President  Burton 
of  Michigan  has  said,  it  should  be  read  by  every  professor  in  America. 
The  logical  implication  of  the  book  would  seem  to  be  that  all  who  enter 
the  profession  of  college  and  university  teaching  should  be  trained  in  the 
social  sciences,  though  the  writer  is  careful  to  point  out  that  speciaUsts 
in  these  very  sciences  are  not  always  fully  alive  to  their  social  responsi- 
bilities. The  speciaUsts  in  the  social  sciences,  he  points  out,  cannot 
continue  to  hand  over  their  responsibiUties  to  a  special  group  of  men 


654  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

other  than  themselves — a  special  group  of  "applied"  social  scientists. 
"  If  the  body  of  knowledge  embraced  in  the  social  sciences  is  to  be  ren- 
dered most  of  value  to  the  world  of  concrete  life,  the  experts  themselves 
are  best  equipped  to  transform  it  into  that  value."  The  only  reason 
why  they  do  not  do  so  is  owing  to  that  peculiar  tradition  which  has 
grown  up  among  college  and  university  teachers  which  we  call  the 
"academic  mind."  That  is  the  real  source  of  the  divorce  between 
thought  and  practice,  between  the  academic  world  and  the  actual  social 
order,  which  we  so  often  find.  The  remedy,  of  course,  lies  in  the  fuller 
recognition  by  academic  men  of  their  responsibility  to  the  social  order 
in  which  they  live. 

The  book  is  decidedly  worth  while,  and  it  is  to  be  hoped  that  it  will 
be  followed  by  many  other  studies  of  the  relation  of  our  system  of  higher 
education  to  our  social  life.  It  is  to  be  regretted  that  Professor  Hudson 
does  not  take  up  in  detail  certain  vital  points  in  this  relation.  It  would 
have  added  to  the  value  of  the  book,  for  example,  if  there  had  been  a 
chapter  discussing  the  responsibility  of  colleges  and  universities  in  train- 
ing social  and  political  leaders.  Unfortunately,  too,  Professor  Hudson 
seems  to  hold  to  a  very  narrow  conception  of  what  "education  for 
citizenship"  would  mean  and  its  place  in  our  whole  scheme  of  education. 
He  speaks  of  it  as  a  "limited  ideal,"  though  its  leading  exponents  would 
hold  it  to  be  synonymous  with  that  education  for  social  efficiency,  for 
general  social  and  poUtical  intelligence,  which  the  book  seems  to  urge 
as  the  main  function  of  the  American  college.  In  spite  of  such  minor 
defects  the  book  will  be  welcomed  by  all  who  are  interested  in  the  pro- 
motion of  the  social  sciences  in  our  colleges  and  in  the  socialization  of 
our  higher  education,  and  especially  because  it  is  written,  not  by  a 
professional  social  scientist,  but  by  a  philosopher. 

Charles  A.  Ellwood 

University  of  Missouri 


The  Principles  of  Education.  By  Jesse  H.  Coursault,  Ph.D.  New 
York:  Silver,  Burdett&  Company,  1920.  Pp  xii4-468.  $3.00. 
Dean  Coursault  has  succeeded  in  producing  a  text  in  the  philosophy 
of  education  which  not  only  breaks  with  the  conventional  treatment  of 
the  subject,  but  which  will  be  of  interest  to  sociologists  as  well  as  educa- 
tors. The  book  undertakes  to  synthesize  the  psychological  and  sociolo- 
gical approaches  to  the  principles  of  education.  It  discusses,  accordingly, 
first  "the  individual  process,"  then  "the  social  process,"  and  finally 


REVIEWS  655 

"the  educational  process."  Under  the  section  on  the  social  process 
there  is  a  chapter  devoted  to  the  analysis  of  the  social  process,  another  to 
the  function  of  social  studies,  and  still  another  to  social  development.  The 
point  of  view  maintained  is,  moreover,  that  of  control  over  the  individual 
and  social  life-processes.  Students  of  sociology  will  be  especially  inter- 
ested in  this  attempt  to  rewrite  the  philosophy  of  education  from  the 
standpoint  of  social  development. 

The  book  is  well  organized  and  the  main  principles  are  so  simply 
and  clearly  developed  that  it  should  find  a  large  use  in  colleges  and 
normal  schools  as  a  text.  If  it  does,  it  will  certainly  aid  in  the  develop- 
ment of  a  socialized  education. 

Charles  A.  Ellwood 
University  of  Missouri 


Schooling  of  the  Immigrant.  By  Frank  V.  Thompson.  New  York : 
Harper  &  Brothers,  1920.     Pp.  408.     $2.00. 

Now  that  immigration  has  risen  to  its  pre-war  rate  of  a  million  a 
year,  quite  obviously  serious  and  nation-wide  measures  need  to  be  taken 
for  the  social  assimilation  of  the  immigrant.  The  problem  has  long  been 
recognized,  and  particularly  since  1914,  but  nowhere  has  it  been  solved. 
Even  the  best  attempts  at  solution  are  not  yet  very  promising. 

This  volume,  prepared  under  the  auspices  of  the  Carnegie  Corpora- 
tion, presents  in  systematic  form  the  more  suggestive  attempts  at  solu- 
tion which  have  been  made  throughout  the  country.  There  is  attempt 
to  discover  the  positive  suggestions  of  value  in  these  experiments,  which 
may  be  incorporated  in  some  ultimate  successful  composite  plan;  and 
also  the  shortcomings  and  failures  of  various  attempts  by  way  of  making 
clear  the  nature  of  difficulties  to  be  overcome.  Pubhc  and  private 
institutions  of  all  kinds  are  carefully  and  critically  analyzed  by  way  of 
discovering  their  strengths  and  weaknesses  in  preparing  for  citizenship. 
There  is  also  systematic  treatment  of  specific  matters  such  as  methods 
of  teaching  English,  the  training  of  teachers,  legislative  enactments,  the 
need  of  individualizing  the  training,  the  problems  involved  in  training 
for  citizenship,  etc. 

Americanization  workers  will  find  in  this  volume  innumerable  facts 

and  suggestions  of  value  to  them  in  planning  and  directing  practical 

educational  activities.     It  is  specially  effective  in  making  clear  the  nature 

of  the  problems. 

Franklin  Bobbitt 
University  of  Chicago 


656  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

The  Nonpartisan  League.  By  Herbert  E.  Gaston.  New  York: 
Harcourt,  Brace  and  Howe,  1920.     Pp.  viii+325.     $1.75. 

The  Story  of  the  Nonpartisan  League.  By  Charles  Edward 
Russell.  New  York:  Harper  and  Brothers,  1920.  Pp.  332. 
$2.00 

The  Despoilers.    By  J.  Edmund  Buttree.     Boston:  The  Christo- 
pher Publishing  House,  1920.     Pp.  314.     $2.00. 
The  Nonpartisan  League.     By  William  Lancer,  Attorney-General 
of  North  Dakota.     Mandan,  N.D.:  Morton  County  Farmers' 
Press,  1920.     Pp.  240.     (Paper.) 

Mr.  Gaston  was  formerly  an  editorial  writer  for  the  Nonpartisan 
League,  but  he  endeavors  to  give  a  fair  and  accurate  account  of  its 
history  and  development,  though  frankly  favoring  it.  His  book  is 
much  the  best  of  the  four  reviewed.  The  author  recognizes  some  of  the 
League's  weaknesses,  but  gives  a  clear  picture  of  its  point  of  view. 

Over  half  of  Mr.  Russell's  book  is  a  history  of  the  abuses  of  the  grain 
trade  and  the  farmers'  grievances  against  the  Minneapolis  dealers.  He 
outhnes  the  League's  program  and  eulogizes  its  accomplishments,  but 
the  account  is  somewhat  fragmentary  and  decidedly  partisan. 

The  Despoilers  is  chiefly  a  collection  of  anti-league  pamphlets,  con- 
taining a  deal  of  preachment  on  the  values  of  individualism,  interspersed 
with  anathemas  against  the  League.  There  is  an  obvious  efifort  to 
impress  the  reader  with  the  author's  knowledge  of  Scripture, 
Shakespeare,  and  classical  authors,  more  loquacious  than  convincing. 
The  book  is  a  good  example  of  the  sort  of  hterature  to  which  the  League 
has  given  rise,  but  adds  nothing  to  one's  understanding  of  the  situation. 

Mr.  Langer's  book  is  unique,  coming  from  the  attorney-general  of 
the  state  and  "pubHshed  under  penalty  of  the  anti-liar  law  of  North 
Dakota  providing  for  one  year  in  the  penitentiary. "  He  challenges  the 
League  to  disprove  his  indictments  of  its  incapacity  and  to  bring  him 
into  court  under  this  law.  Though  vitriohc  in  style,  Mr.  Langer's 
pamphlet  presents  facts  against  the  League  which  are  not  satisfactorily 
answered  by  either  Mr.  Gaston  or  Mr.  Russell,  and  which  the  League 
must  clearly  refute  if  it  is  to  make  its  case  with  even  a  friendly  pubhc. 

One  cannot  but  be  impressed  that  here  is  a  movement  which  fur- 
nishes unusual  material  for  the  sociologist  and  social  psychologist,  but 
that  as  yet  we  have  no  serious  study  of  it.  Mr.  Gaston  clearly  recognizes 
the  weakness  of  Mr.  Townley's  domination  of  the  organization,  but 
claims  that  has  been  necessary  to  win  the  fight.     Irrespective  of  the 


REVIEWS  657 

theoretical  aspects  of  a  more  democratic  form  of  organization,  one 
cannot  but  wonder  what  might  be  the  outcome  of  the  movement  if 
its  leader  should  be  stricken.  Whether  such  a  movement  for  democracy 
can  succeed  permanently  will  largely  depend  upon  ability  to  develop 
leadership  which  is  loyal  and  efficient  but  independent. 

DwiGHT  Sanderson 
Cornell  University 

Democratic  Industry:  A  Practical  Study  in  Social  History.  By 
Joseph  Husslein,  S.J.,  Ph.D.  New  York:  P.  J.  Kennedy 
&  Sons,  1920.     Pp.  362.     $1.50. 

The  viewpoint:  "The  Catholic  writers,  whose  doctrines  dated  back 
to  the  IMiddle  Ages  ....  were  clearly  the  originators  of  modern 
democracy.  Its  entire  structure,  in  so  far  as  it  is  true  and  sound, 
rests  upon  the  work  of  the  Catholic  schoolmen " — P.  277. 

The  aim  of  the  new  Catholic  guild  system:   "The  full  possibiUties  of 

increased  production  will  not  be  reaUzed  so  long  as  the  majority  of  the 

workers  remain  mere  wage  earners.     The  majority  must  somehow  become 

owners,  or  at  least  in  part,  of  the  means  of  production.     They  can  be 

enabled  to  reach  this  stage  gradually  through  co-operative  productive 

societies  and  copartnership  arrangements.     In  the  former  the  workers 

own  and  manage  the  industries  themselves;  in  the  latter  they  own  a 

substantial  part  of  the  corporate  stock  and  exercise  a  reasonable  share 

in  the  management.     However  slow  the  attainment  of  these  ends  they 

will  have  to  be  reached  before  we  can  have  a  thoroughly  efficient  system 

of  production,  or  an  industrial  social  order  that  will  be  secure  from  the 

danger  of  revolution." — P.  292,  quoted  from  Reconstruction  Pamphlets, 

No.  I,  p.  22. 

Victor  E.  Helleberg 
University  of  Kansas 


Italian  Women  in  Industry.  By  Louise  C.  Odencrantz.  New 
York:  Russell  Sage  Foundation,  1919.  Pp.  V4-345.  $1.50. 
This  is  an  intensive  study  of  living  and  working  conditions  of  1,095 
young  Italian  women,  representing  61  industries,  in  that  section  of 
New  York  City  which  lies  below  Fourteenth  Street.  While  the  investi- 
gation deals  with  pre-war  conditions,  it  contains  information  valuable 
to  those  who  are  now  trying  to  dovetail  our  immigrant  groups  into  an 
American  citizenry.  Wages  are  higher  today,  and  expenditures  greater, 
but  it  is  doubtful  if  conditions  are  otherwise  much  changed. 


658  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

Miss  Odencrantz  has  given  us  a  sympathetic  and  scholarly  study. 
Such  studies  must  always  present  a  somewhat  blurred  picture  of  the  life 
they  undertake  to  portray.  We  have  the  interview,  the  visit  to  home 
and  work  place,  the  questionnaire,  a  few  budgets,  and  a  book,  while  the 
women  go  on  working  with  feathers,  candy,  crackers,  corsets,  petticoats, 
cigars,  boxes,  stationery,  cereals,  olives,  and  what  not,  with  an  over- 
powering weariness  and  unutterably  barren  lives.  But  the  book  is  not 
futile  if  it  leads  to  even  a  limited  understanding  of  the  problems  of  some 
foreign  individuals  enmeshed  in  our  industrial  system. 

Annie  Marion  MacLean 
Chicago,  III. 

The  Social  Case  History:  Its  Construction  and  Content.  By  Ada 
Eliot  Sheffield,  Director,  Boston  Bureau  on  Illegitimacy. 
New  York:    Russell  Sage  Foundation,  1920.     Pp.227.    Si  00. 

The  author  proposes  that  the  social-case  history  include  only  those 
facts  which  make  effective  treatment  possible.  Successful  use  of  this 
test,  she  believes,  involves  the  development  of  larger  and  clearer  concepts. 
Many  devices  are  suggested  for  accomplishing  these  aims. 

This  book  is  the  result  of  much  practical  experience  and  will  appeal 
to  those  who  are  interested  in  higher  standards  of  record-keeping, 
though  administrators  will  probably  think  that  confusion  will  result 
from  any  attempt  to  make  everyday  use  of  larger  concepts  not  previously 
clearly  defined.  Further,  treatment  as  a  measure  of  the  record- value 
of  a  social  fact  is  a  useful  yardstick  (i)  when  workers  are  uniformly 
trained  to  use  and  provided  with  adequate  standardized  administrative 
devices;  (2)  when  the  appearance  of  new  methods  of  treatment  need  not 
be  anticipated  during  the  Hfe  of  the  record;  and  (3)  when  social-service 
policies  have  been  generally  agreed  upon.  Until  these  conditions 
obtain,  if  treatment-value  be  the  test  of  the  relative  significance  of 
social  facts  to  the  recorder,  records  must  be  re-written  with  changes  in 
the  personnel,  policy,  or  procedure  of  the  agency  and  with  every 
advance  in  the  social  sciences. 

Erle  Fiske  Young 

University  of  Chicago 


Housing  and  the  Housing  Problem.    By  Carol  Aronovici.    Chi- 
cago: McClurg  &  Co.,  1920    Pp.  163.     $0.75. 

This  is  a  brief  statement  of  the  principles  involved  in  a  housing 
program.    An  attempt  is  made  to  point  out  the  fundamental  social 


REVIEWS  659 

and  economic  conditions  connected  with  the  housing  problem.  The 
housing  situation  will  not  be  materially  relieved  by  philanthropic  build- 
ing projects,  such  as  the  well-known  Port  Sunlight  and  Octavia  Hill 
enterprises.  The  problem  must  be  approached  by  a  careful  study  of 
the  economic  factors  involved,  such  as  costs  of  land,  labor,  and  mate- 
rials. Up  to  date  our  attention  has  been  largely  centered  upon  the  ques- 
tion of  sanitation,  and  to  this  end  we  have  framed  a  great  deal  of  housing 
legislation,  much  of  which  is  purely  arbitrary  and  complicates  the 
economic  side  of  the  question.  The  author  shows  that  housing  is  essen- 
tially a  community  problem.  The  forces  at  work  in  our  laissez  faire 
system  of  community  Ufe  make  it  increasingly  difficult  for  the  individual 
family  to  build  or  own  its  own  home,  also  make  it  a  hazardous  under- 
taking for  private  capital  to  build  homes  for  rent.  The  community 
must  look  upon  the  housing  of  its  citizens  as  an  essential  part  of  its 
corporate  existence  and  safeguard  the  residential  areas  by  a  scientific 
system  of  community-planning. 

Laymen  in  the  field  of  housing  reform  will  find  this  a  brief  but 
comprehensive  statement  of  the  housing  problem  from  the  pen  of  a 
well-known  authority  in  the  field.  Unfortunately  the  author  is  not 
always  clear  in  his  statements.  Sentences  are  frequently  long  and 
involved;  sometimes  they  are  meaningless,  as  for  example  the  follow- 
ing: "  Going  a  little  further  into  the  statistics  of  land  we  find  that  one- 
third  of  the  population  of  the  country.  Going  a  little  further  into  the 
statistics  of  the  total  area  of  these  cities  is  only  o.  123  of  the  total  area  of 
the  United  States"  (pp.  79-80). 

The  book  conUins  no  index,  but  a  selected  bibliography  is  appended. 

R.  D.  McKenzie 

University  of  Washington 


Organization  of  Public  Health  Nursing.  By  Annie  M.  Brainard. 
New  York:  The  Macmillan  Co.,  1919.  Pp.144.  $1.35. 
This  is  a  handbook  designed  especially  for  the  use  of  the  public- 
health  nurse.  It  discusses  the  fundamental  principles  of  the  organiza- 
tion of  public-health  nursing  as  gleaned  from  experience  in  many  different 
types  of  communities.  Among  the  points  emphasized  are:  (x)  the  need 
of  efficient  organization  to  support  the  work  of  the  public-health  nurse; 
(2)  ways  and  means  of  financing  the  work  in  small  communities;  (3) 
methods  of  selecting  supervisory  committees  and  boards  of  directors  in 
order  to  obtain  the  most  efficient  type  of  local  representation  and  team 


66o  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

work;  (4)  the  sort  of  technical  training  required  by  the  public-health 
nurse.  In  this  respect  it  might  be  noted  that  no  mention  is  made  of 
the  need  of  training  in  social  case  work  and  community  organization. 
It  is  generally  conceded  now  that  the  pubHc-health  nurse  should  also 
be  a  trained  social  worker  inasmuch  as  her  work  brings  her  into  contact 
with  situations  requiring  for  their  solution  considerable  knowledge  of 
community  forces  and  agencies.  It  is  not  enough  that  her  professional 
skill  should  merely  enable  her  "to  interpret  the  physician's  orders 
correctly." 

The  book  will  be  found  useful  by  all  who  are  interested  in  this  par- 
ticular line  of  social  service. 

R.  D.  McKenzie 

UNrVERSITY  OF  WASHINGTON 


Industrial  Housing.  With  discussion  of  accompanying  activities, 
such  as  Town  Planning,  Street  Systems,  Development  of  Utility 
Services,  and  Related  Engineering  and  Construction  Features. 
By  Morris  Knowles.  McGraw-Hill  Book  Company,  Inc., 
1920.     Pp.  XV -f 314.     $5.00. 

From  the  point  of  view  of  technical  treatment  of  the  housing  problem 
as  affecting  industrial  housing  this  is  one  of  the  first  works  in  America  to 
recognize  the  "interdependence  of  many  agencies  and  the  need  of  the 
co-ordination  of  several  professions  in  the  development  of  a  successful 
town  plan  and  in  the  up-building  of  a  contented  industrial  community. " 

Approaching  industrial  housing  from  this  broad  point  of  view  Mr. 
Knowles  does  not  neglect  a  single  aspect  of  the  problem  of  construction, 
community  development,  public  service,  and  administration  that  may 
affect  the  economic,  sanitary,  and  aesthetic  aspects  of  the  home.  While 
some  questions  may  be  raised  regarding  the  adequacy  of  the  standards 
propounded  by  the  author  and  the  acceptance  without  discussion  of 
practices  of  city  planning  and  housing  which  are  still  without  thorough 
scientific  foundation,  the  book  is  so  full  of  suggestive  thought  and  so 
devoid  of  dogmatism  that  it  would  make  a  most  excellent  classroom 
text  in  schools  for  the  training  of  engineers,  architects,  social  workers, 
and  public-health  officials. 

The  chapters  dealing  with  the  engineering  aspects  of  housing  and 
town-planning  are  especially  valuable  because  of  the  information  regard- 
ing the  experience  of  various  communities  and  the  guides  for  procedure 
in  dealing  with  such  problems  as  lighting,  water  supply,  sewerage,  waste 
disposal,  etc. 


REVIEWS  66 1 

The  author  has  kept  clear  of  any  controverted  aspect  of  the  subject 
and  thereby  has  accomplished  a  task  in  systematization  that  has  not 
been  attempted  by  any  other  writer  in  this  country. 

Carol  Aronovici 
Belvedere,  Cal. 


Bolshevism    at    Work.    By    William    T.    Goode.     New    York: 
Harcourt,  Brace  and  Howe,  1920.     Pp.  143. 
An  interesting  inside  view  of  the  processes  of  life,  labor,  and  education 
in  Bolshevist  Russia. 

The  Political  Philosophy  of  Robert  M.  La  Follette.     Compiled  by 
Ellen  Torelle.     Madison,  Wis.:  The  Robert  M.  La  Foliate 
Co.,  1920.     Pp.  426. 
Short  extracts  from  the  public  addresses  and  writings  of  La  Follette. 

They  throw  an  interesting  side  light  on  the  Progressive  movement  in 

American  politics  from  1900  to  1920. 

Essays   on    Vocation.    Edited   by   Basil   Matthews.    London: 
Oxford  University  Press,  1919.     Pp.  128. 

A  stimulating  and  helpful  series  of  essays  by  English  scholars, 
intended  to  point  the  way  to  various  vocations  in  post-war  Britain. 

The  Community  Health  Problem.    By  Athel  C.  Burnham.     New 
York:  The  Macmillan  Co.,  1920.     Pp.  149. 
A  scientific  survey  of  the  pubUc-health  movement  in  the  United 
States.     Contains  valuable  vital  statistics. 

Labor's    Crisis.     An    Employer's    View    of  Labor   Problems.     By 
SiGMUND  Mendelsohn.     New  York:    The  Macmillan  Co., 
1920.     Pp.  xii+iyi.     $1.50. 
Interesting  as  revealing  the  attitudes  of  a  type  of  employer  emerging 

in  the  present  labor  struggle  in  the  United  States. 

Labor  in  Politics,  or  Class  versus  Country.    By  Charles  Norman 
Fay.     Privately  printed.    Cambridge,  Mass. :    The  University 
Press,  1920.     Pp.  xii+284. 
Reveals    the   attitudes   of   a   representative   of   capitalism.    Also 

contains  valuable  statistics  of  the  labor  movement  in  America. 


662  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

A  Living  Wage.    Its  Ethical  and  Economic  Aspects.     By  John  A. 

Ryan.     New  York:  The  Macmillan  Co.,  1920.     Pp.  ix+182. 

$2.00. 

Revised  and  abridged  edition  of  Ryan's  larger  book  of  the  same  title. 
Interesting  as  revealing  the  most  recent  ofl5cial  attitudes  of  the  Catholic 
church  upon  the  problems  of  capital  and  labor. 

The  Opium  Monopoly.  By  Ellen  N.  La  Motte.  New  York: 
The  Macmillan  Co.,  1920.  Pp.  xvii+84.  $1.00. 
A  brief  statement  of  the  main  facts  of  the  opium  traffic  as  fostered 
and  developed  under  British  colonial  policy.  Contains  tables  of  statistics 
concerning  the  traffic  compiled  from  the  most  recent  official  records  of 
the  colonies  concerned. 

The   Industrial   Republic.    By   Paul   W.    Litchfield.    Boston: 
Houghton  Mifflin  Co.,  1920.     Pp.  95.     $1.00. 
A  brief  description  of  the  co-operative  plan  recently  introduced  by 
the  Goodyear  Rubber  Company  into  the  operation  of  their  plant  at 
Akron,  Ohio. 

Modern  Germany.     Its  Rise,  Growth,  Downfall,  and  Future.     By 
J.  Ellis  Barker.     New  York:    E.  P.  Button  &  Co.,  1919. 
Pp.  ix-l-496.     $6.00. 
A  new  and  enlarged  edition  of  the  author's  Modern  Germany  with 

much  new  material  based  on  post-war  conditions  and  situations. 

Italy  and  the  World  War.     By  Thomas  Nelson  Page.     New  York: 
Charles  Scribner's  Sons,  1920.     Pp.  xii+422.     $5.00. 
A  historical  review  of  the  diplomatic  relations  of  modern  Italy. 
Valuable  as  revealing  the  diplomatic  attitudes  of  many  European  nations. 

The  New  World  Order.  By  Frederick  Charles  Hicks.  New 
York:  Doubleday,  Page  &  Co.,  1920,  Pp.  viii-l-496. 
A  critical  discussion  of  the  problems  of  world-organization,  co- 
operation, and  order  following  the  world-war.  Pertinent  analyses  of 
the  Versailles  treaties  and  the  League  of  Nations.  Appendices  contain 
valuable  excerpts  from  the  various  recent  post-war  treaties. 


REVIEWS  663 

Sex  and  Sex  Worship;   A  Scientific  Treatise  on  Sex,  Its  Nature  and 
Function,  and  Its  Influence  on  Art,  Science,  Architecture,  and 
Religion — mth  Special  Reference  to  Sex  Worship  and  Sym- 
bolism.    By  0.  A.  Wall,  M.D.,  Ph.G.,  Ph.M.     St.  Louis: 
C.  V.  Mosby  Co.,  1919.     Pp.  xv+607.    $7.50. 
This  book  is  written  by  an  old  gentleman  who  read  a  great  many 
books  on  religion  and  sex.     Unfortunately  he  lost  his  notes.     The  book 
represents  what  he  remembers  of  his  reading.     It  is  a  large  book,  hand- 
somely bound  and  well  printed,  but,  in  spite  of  its  title,  it  is  not  scientific. 

Robert  E.  Park 

UNrVERSITY  OF  CHICAGO 


Pool,  Billiards  and  Bowling  Alleys  as  a  Phase  of  Commercialized 

Amusements  in  Toledo,  Ohio.    By  Rev.  John  J.  Pedelan,  M.A. 

Toledo:  Little  Book  Press,  1919.     Pp.  292.     $2.00. 

This  is  an  essay  on  commercialized  amusements  based  on  a  survey  of 

the  pool  rooms  in  Toledo.     It  contains,  in  addition  to  the  facts  gathered 

in  Toledo,  a  copy  of  the  schedule  used  in  the  survey,  a  questionnaire  for 

high  schools,  a  digest  of  Ohio  laws  as  to  minors,  and  of  the  Ohio  laws 

concerning  recreation,  the  pool-room  ordinances  of  sixty-two  cities,  a 

reproduction  of  the  social  and  industrial  creeds  of  the  churches,  and  a 

portrait  of  the  author.     It  is  a  useful  book  but  its  tone  is  hortatory. 

Robert  E.  Park 
University  of  Chicago 


Letters  to  a  Young  Man  on  Love  and  Health.     By  Walter  M. 

Gallichan.    New  York:  F.  A.  Stokes  Co.,  1920.    Pp.  119. 

$1.00. 

An  excellent  handbook  in  sex  education  for  young  men.    The  twelve 

letters  are  refreshingly  frank,  direct,  and  complete,  as  might  be  expected 

from  the  author  of  The  Psychology  of  Marriage. 


RECENT  LITERATURE 


NOTES  AND  ABSTRACTS 

A  Theory  of  History. — Historical  theories  of  history  are  nearly  as  numerous  as 
historians.  Paradoxically,  their  historicity  lies  almost  wholly  in  the  fact  that  they 
are  facts  of  record.  So  far  as  intellectual  content  goes  they  are  philosophy  rather  than 
history  and  the  outstanding  ones  have  been  evolved  by  philosophers,  not  brought 
forth  by  historians.  Histor>'  primarily  is  factual  detail  and  altogether  concrete. 
Secondarily,  it  ventures  timorously  upon  generalizations.  It  depicts  "situations," 
"general  aspects,"  and  "trends."  In  so  doing  it  becomes  in  modest  measure  phi- 
losophy or  sociology.  From  Plato  to  Comte  and  from  Comte  to  the  Adams  brothers 
one  encounters  five  distinct  type  groups  of  theories  of  history.  The  first  group 
comprises  the  predestinal  philosophies  of  the  metaphysicians,  the  logicians,  and 
others.  In  the  second  group  fall  the  philosophies  of  social  self-determination.  A 
third  group  of  interpretations  goes  back  to  the  geographical  or  "environmental" 
influence.  The  writings  of  Montesquieu  remain  the  classical  example,  but  the 
researches  of  Ellen  C.  Semple  and  Ellsworth  Huntington  are  of  a  more  substantial 
value.  Theories  of  the  fourth  group  e.xplain  history  in  the  terms  of  heritage.  Heritage 
is  the  total  product  of  human  activity  hitherto  which  we  now  enjoy.  It  includes  our 
acquired  habits,  our  art-:,  our  knowledge,  and  our  property.  The  working  hypotheses 
which  make  up  the  fifth  group  of  philosophies  of  history  accoimt  for  the  stream  of 
human  experience  as  the  solar  system  or  a  thunderstorm  is  accounted  for,  as  a  case 
of  equilibration.  Herbert  Spencer  and  Brooks  Adams  resolve  it  into  a  degradation  of 
physical  energy.  Indi\idual  biologists  and  bio-anthropologists  see  historj'  as  heredity 
and  natural  selection.  Taking  physics  and  biology  both  for  granted,  the  author 
defends  the  thesis  that  human  history  is  a  psychological  or  behavioristic  equilibration. 
The  premise  from  which  the  argument  proceeds  is  that  men  are  not  bom  equal. 
Behavioristic  reaction  to  stimulation,  whether  it  is  instinctive  or  rational  reaction,  is 
more  adaptive  and  vigorous  on  the  part  of  some  aggregations  of  men  than  it  is  on  the 
part  of  other  aggregations.  The  practical  activities  of  more  vigorous  groups  and 
classes  overflow  into  those  of  more  sluggish  groups  and  classes.  Histor>'  is  adventure 
and  the  urge  to  adventure  is  the  cause  of  history-. — Franklin  H.  Giddings,  Political 
Science  Quarterly,  December,  1920.  O.  B.  Y. 

Sociology:  Its  Nature  and  Scope,  Aims  and  Methods. — (i)  Sociology'  is  the 
science  of  society  in  which  the  interactions  of  human  beings  are  expressed  through 
physical  bodies  and  have  relation  to  physical  surroundings.  Sociology  is  one  of  the 
mental  and  moral  sciences,  as  the  Germans  say  Geisteswissenschajtcn,  sciences  of  the 
mind.  Human  society  is  essentially  living,  subject  to  growth  and  decay,  and  its 
scientific  consideration  will  pay  particular  attention  to  the  genetic  features.  Though 
sociology  is  based  on  a  survey  of  social  facts,  it  is  almost  equally  concerned  with  ideals. 
(2)  The  chief  subject-matter  of  sociology  is  social  organism  as  wholes  functioning 
wholes.  It  will  be  well  to  distinguish  in  sociology  an  empirical,  a  philosophical,  and  a 
practical  part.  The  empirical  study  may  concern  itself  first  with  a  survey  of  present 
social  facts  based  on  analytic  methods.  With  the  consideration  of  historical  social 
life  the  genetic  character  predominates.  The  material  and  conclusions  need  the 
comparative  study  of  social  systems  and  ideals  as  they  exist  at  the  present  time  or 
have  existed  in  the  course  of  history.  The  comparative  study  depends  for  its  material 
on  the  analytic  and  the  genetic  studies  of  social  facts.  This  leads  to  the  critical 
consideration  of  the  facts  assembled  in  comparative  study  of  social  systems.  From 
the  outset  of  such  criticism  a  constructive  conception  is  almost  inevitably  implied, 
even  though  only  tentatively  accepted.  (3)  The  aim  of  sociology  is  to  make  clear 
the  nature  of  social  ideals  and  forces  and  the  conditions  in  which  these  are  related. 

664 


RECENT  LITEILiTURE  665 

Sociology  aims  at  the  scientific  co-ordination  of  social  facts.  (4)  The  methods 
appropriate  in  sociology  are  analytic,  genetic,  comparative,  critical,  and  synthetic. 
They  are  psjxhological  and  historical,  empirical  and  philosophical. — Alban  G.  Widgery, 
The  Indian  Journal  of  Sociology,  January,  1920.  C.  N. 

The  Character  of  Primitive  Human  Progress. — The  most  remarkable  thing 
aniong  natural  processes  is  the  unfolding  of  the  intellect  and  moral  nature  of  man. 
Since  his  emergence  from  the  animal  state  he  has  possessed  powers  comparable  to 
those  which  he  now  manifests.  In  the  earliest  stages  the  individual  man  or  the  small 
group  had  to  approach  the  problems  of  life  and  environment  without  any  effective 
tradition  to  guide  or  sympathetic  collaboration  with  others  to  inspire.  This  called 
for  a  measure  of  independence  unlike  anything  manifested  by  individuals  today  except 
in  the  labors  of  men  of  dominating  genius.  The  first  fundamental  step  forward  in 
the  control  of  nature,  whether  taken  by  the  individual  or  the  collective  mind,  was  the 
most  novel  mental  event  occurring  after  the  appearance  of  life  in  the  process  of  evolu- 
tion. INIan's  environment,  both  that  which  he  has  found  in  the  external  world  and 
that  which  he  himself  has  created,  has  served  to  release  the  powers  inherent  in  his 
nature.  The  external  world  has  no  power  in  itself  by  which  it  can  project  a  force  from 
itself  into  the  mind  of  man  and  create  there  a  new  character.  There  is  no  reason  to 
suppose  that  the  release  of  man's  energies  was  sudden,  like  that  of  a  coiled  spring; 
it  is  far  more  probable  that  the  process  was  a  gradual  one.  And  now  it  is  more  probable 
that  the  race  is  still  in  its  infancy  than  that  it  has  come  to  old  age.  In  our  present  state  the 
greatest  inspiration  to  an  intellectual  life,  and  hence  to  an  increase  of  power,  comes 
from  the  interactions  of  mind  with  mind.  To  the  development  of  language,  the  prime 
means  of  the  communication  of  mind  with  mind,  has  been  given  the  honor  of  initiating 
the  marvelous  release  of  the  powers  of  man.  Language  was  a  product  of  the  collective 
rather  than  of  the  individual  mind.  In  view  of  this  first  magnificent  creation  of  the 
primitive  mind,  we  cannot  refuse  to  recognize  that  early  man  possessed  powers  which 
do  not  suffer  in  comparison  with  those  manifested  today. — R.  D.  Carmichael,  Scientific 
Monthly,  January,  1921.  K.  E.  B. 

The  Problem  of  the  American  Negro. — The  degree  of  variability  of  physical  and 
mental  qualities  in  each  race  is  very  great.  In  every  population  we  find  persons  who 
are  stupid  and  intelligent,  weak  and  strong,  moral  and  immoral.  But  when  we  turn 
to  racial  types  that  are  fundamentally  distinct  the  biological  question  seems  simpler. 
Such  traits  of  the  negro  as  the  pigmentation  of  the  skin,  the  form  of  the  hair,  the 
nose,  etc.,  are  so  characteristic  that  they  are  not  duplicated  among  the  whites.  Yet 
we  cannot  follow  out  the  racial  differences  in  the  same  detail  in  regard  to  internal 
organs.  It  has  been  pointed  out  that  the  liver,  the  spleen,  and  the  brain  of  the  negro 
are  on  the  average  smaller  than  those  of  the  white.  Whether  or  not  there  is  a  difference 
in  the  number  of  cells  and  connective  fibers  in  the  brains  of  the  two  races  is  an  open 
question.  The  problem  of  heredity  is  also  connected  with  the  negro  problem.  The 
army  tests  have  indicated  the  negro  to  be  inferior  to  the  white  and  that  northern 
negroes  were  very  much  superior  to  southern  negroes.  But  when  we  keep  in  mind 
the  abject  fear  of  southern  negroes  under  the  white  oflncer  and  the  limitations  of 
early  childhood  and  of  general  upbringing  of  the  negroes  in  the  South,  we  will  decline 
to  accept  these  mental  tests  as  a  convincing  proof  of  the  hereditary  inferiority  of  the 
negro  race.  On  the  contrary,  the  highly  developed  native  arts,  weaving,  carving, 
pottery-,  metal  casting,  etc.,  done  by  the  black  races  in  Africa,  give  a  proof  of  the 
negro's  mental  ability.  The  same  biological  inferiority  also  is  ascribed  to  the  mulattoes 
who  are  almost  all  descended  from  white  fathers  and  negro  mothers.  Besides  biological 
and  psychological  justifications  for  the  inferiority  of  the  negro  race  there  is  the  social 
basis  of  the  race  prejudice  which  is  founded  on  the  tendency  to  emerge  the  indi\idual  in 
the  class  to  which  he  belongs,  and  to  ascribe  to  him  all  the  characteristics  of  his  class.  The 
consciousness  that  the  negro  belongs  to  a  class  by  himself  is  kept  alive  by  the  contrast 
presented  by  his  physical  appearance  with  that  of  the  whites.  Intermixture  of  blood 
will  decrease  the  contrast  between  the  extreme  racial  forms  and  this  will  lead  to  a 
lessening  of  the  consciousness  of  race  distinction.  The  negro  problem  will  not  dis- 
appear in  America  until  the  negro  blood  has  been  so  much  diluted  that  it  will  no  longer 


666  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

be  recognized,  just  as  anti-Semitism  will  not  disappear  until  the  last  vestige  of  the  Jew 
as  a  Jew  has  disappeared. — Franz  Boas,  The  Yale  Review,  January,  192 1.         C.  N. 

The  Aaland  Question. — Geographically,  ethnographically,  and  culturally  the 
Aalanders  belong  to  the  Swedish  nationality  in  Finland.  The  Swedish  Finlanders 
of  the  mainland  are  as  determined  as  the  Aalanders  to  preserve  their  nationality  for 
all  future.  It  is  among  them  that  the  Swedish  national  movement  in  Finland 
originated.  They  maintain  that  the  preservation  of  the  Swedish  nationality  in 
Finland  is  a  right  which  belongs  to  them  and  is  also  a  duty  to  the  country  which  they 
share  with  the  Finns,  because  their  language  forms  the  cultural  bridge  with  Sweden 
and  the  other  Scandinavian  countries  with  their  old  civilization.  They  beUeve  that 
just  as  the  French-speaking  inhabitants  of  Switzerland  can  preserve  their  nationality 
without  becoming  subjects  of  France,  so  the  Swedish-speaking  Finlanders  can  preserve 
theirs  without  becoming  subjects  of  Sw-eden.  Finland's  constitution  of  1Q19  recognizes 
both  Finnish  and  Swedish  as  the  national  languages  and  it  recognizes  in  theory  that 
the  cultural  interests  of  the  Swedish-speaking  population  shall  be  supported  by  the 
state  in  accordance  with  the  same  principles  as  those  applied  to  the  Finnish-speaking 
population.  These  stipulations  presuppose  as  their  supplement  special  legislation 
regulating  detail.  The  various  Swedish-speaking  districts  desire  autonomy  within 
the  state  and  the  establishment  of  a  higher  administrative  unit  comprising  the  whole 
Swedish-speaking  Finland.  Through  their  delegates  they  have  expressed  the  hope 
that  the  Council  of  the  League  of  Nations  will  postpone  its  recommendations  with 
regard  to  the  Aaland  Islands  until  the  diet  of  the  repubUc  has  regulated  the  position 
of  that  nationality  as  a  whole. — Edward  Westermarck,  Contemporary  Review, 
December,  1920.  O.  B.  Y. 

Social  Reform  in  Missouri  1820-1920. — This  treatise  is  a  survey  of  social  reform 
and  social  legislation,  showing  the  work  of  the  numerous  agencies  which  have  con- 
tributed to  the  social  program.  The  subjects  treated  are  crime  and  punishment, 
poverty  and  disease,  the  insane  and  feeble-minded,  child  welfare,  boards  of  supervision, 
and  welfare.  These  subjects  are  treated  scientifically  with  especial  emphasis  on 
child  welfare  and  education  of  the  negro  since  the  Civil  War. — George  B.  Mangold 
(Pamphlet).     Columbia,  Mo. :  Missouri  State  Historical  Society.  R.  D.  G. 

The  Indianization  of  Christianity. — In  India  it  has  been  traditional  to  confine 
the  chief  cultural  advantages  to  those  belonging  to  the  higher  castes.  The  majority 
of  the  converts  to  the  Christian  faith  have  been  from  the  depressed  and  backward 
classes,  for  Hinduism  has  very  little  to  offer  the  non-caste  man.  When  the  claims 
of  Christianity  are  presented  he  has  to  choose  between  the  traditional  religion  which 
proposes  to  perpetuate  his  disadvantages  and  the  new  faith  which  promises  ameliora- 
tion of  his  wrongs  and  a  democracy  of  spiritual  privilege.  These  lower  classes  were 
not  in  a  position  to  make  much  of  a  contribution  to  the  task  of  rendering  an  Indian 
interpretation  of  their  new  faith.  Now  that  the  third  and  fourth  generations  are 
appearing  in  some  localities  this  situation  is  rapidly  changing.  Many  of  these  have 
received  the  advantages  of  college  training.  Christians  from  caste  communities 
bring  with  them  to  their  adopted  faith  the  heritage  of  an  ancient  civilization.  The 
imagery  with  which  the  thought-processes  of  the  Indian  people  proceed  is  so  different 
from  that  of  Westerners  that  we  do  not  realize  its  significance  without  years  of  observa- 
tion and  study  and  even  then  not  fully,  (i)  The  Indian  mind  responds  more  readily 
to  parables  than  to  syllogisms.  Even  the  philosophic  arguments  abound  in  similes 
and  metaphors.  (2)  The  Indian  mind  responds  more  readily  to  the  idealistic  than 
the  empirical  method  of  thought.  (3)  The  Indian  religious  consciousness  is  inclined 
to  be  mystical  and  contemplative.  Its  ideal  is  a  life  of  ineffable  communion  or 
union  with  God.  An  example  of  this  mystical  element  is  that  e.xpressed  in  the  con- 
cepts of  yoga  mdrga  or  way  of  asceticism.  The  Christian  Sadhu  movement  is  an 
attempt  to  link  the  Christian  life  to  the  yoga  ideal.  The  Christianizing  of  India  will 
involve  an  Indianization  of  Christianity  as  surely  as  the  Christianizing  of  the  Graeco- 
Roman  world  involved  the  Hellenizing  of  Christianity. — Angus  Stewart  Woodbume, 
Journal  of  Religion,  January,  192 1.  O.  B.  Y. 


RECENT  LITERATURE  667 

What  Are  the  Japanese  Doing  toward  Americanization? — The  Japanese  are 
helping  to  Americanize  themselves  in  four  ways:  (i)  through  the  means  of  Japanese 
Christian  churches,  seventy-five  of  which  now  have  more  or  less  definite  programs  for 
social  work,  including  such  things  as  teaching  of  English,  instruction  in  home  economics 
and  sanitation,  and  other  social  activities  that  are  definitely  contributory  to  the 
spiritual  and  physical  assimilation  of  the  Japanese;  (2)  through  the  Japanese  press, 
consisting  of  fifteen  dailies  and  twenty-five  periodicals,  that  are  meeting  the  needs 
of  those  who,  because  of  lack  of  education  and  advanced  age,  are  unable  to  read  the 
English  papers,  by  having  the  bulk  of  news  contents  deal  with  some  subject  related  to 
the  Americanization  of  the  Japanese;  (3)  through  the  Japanese-language  schools, 
which  are  purely  supplementary  in  nature,  giving  instruction  only  in  the  Japanese 
language  which  is  at  present  still  the  dominant  language  of  the  home;  (4)  through 
Japanese  associations  in  America,  organized  voluntarily  among  the  Japanese  residents 
in  various  localities  solely  for  the  purpose  of  promoting  the  welfare  of  their  members 
and  the  friendship  both  among  themselves  and  with  Americans,  and  not,  as  many 
Americans  are  inclined  to  regard,  agencies  supported  by  the  government  in  Tokyo. 
One  of  the  recent  and  important  additions  to  the  administrative  ofl&cers  of  the  associa- 
tions is  the  Americanization  Committee  whose  prime  duty  is  to  send  lecturers  on 
Americanization  to  various  Japanese  centers,  to  distribute  suitable  literature  on 
Americanization,  and  to  assist  and  give  advice  in  adopting  respectable  American 
customs  and  spirit. — Junzo  Sasamori,  Japan  Review,  December,  1920.  K.  E.  B. 

Great  Cities  and  Social  Settlements. — The  Chicago  Federation  of  Settlements, 
composed  of  twenty-five  groups  covering  a  wide  range  of  work  done  by  settlements 
of  Chicago,  has  for  its  object  fellowship  and  co-operation.  It  endeavors  as  a  unit 
to  further  public  and  private  measures  intended  to  accomplish  its  ends.  A  statement 
just  issued  from  the  ofl5ce  of  the  secretary  of  the  National  Federation  of  Settlements 
sets  forth  clearly  and  concisely  the  motives  and  methods  of  settlement  work,  (i)  The 
democratization  of  culture  among  settlement  motives  continues  to  be  of  first  impor- 
tance. The  method  of  promoting  culture  through  the  interchange  of  experience  is  of 
proved  validity.  (2)  Residence  has  demonstrated  itself  more  than  a  motive  and  a 
method:  it  is  a  spiritual  experience.  (3)  Residence  provides  an  important  means  of 
knowing  the  conditions  of  the  people's  life,  and  of  assisting  them  to  develop  new  forms 
of  group  expression.  (4)  Residence  is  among  the  best  forms  of  preparation  for 
participation  in  civic  affairs.  (5)  Definite  and  thorough  instruction  in  the  principles, 
ideas,  and  methods  of  settlement  work  should  be  assured  all  residents  and  associate 
workers,  that  they  may  be  capable  of  seeing  the  universal  in  the  particular.  (6)  Settle- 
ment organization  should  be  kept  flexible  enough  to  permit  ready  response  to 
opportunities  for  securing  individuals  and  groups  not  included  in  the  established 
routine.  (7)  The  formation  of  an  international  federation  of  settlements,  with 
provisions  to  keep  members  in  touch  with  one  another  through  correspondence, 
exchange  of  workers,  and  conferences,  is  a  logical  next  step  in  settlement  organization. 
— R.  E.  Hieronymous,  School  and  Home  Education,  November,  1920.  K.  E.  B. 

Survey  of  Cripples  in  New  York  City. — This  survey  reveals  the  status  of  the 
cripples  of  that  city  through  a  study  of  3,600  cases.  Graphical  representations  show 
how  the  cases  have  been  analyzed  and  classified  for  treatment  by  the  social  agencies. 
A  lack  of  necessary  funds  and  social  workers  in  various  lines  has  greatly  impeded 
the  work.  With  better  organization  and  co-operation  greater  results  are  being 
accomplished.  The  great  problem  is  vocational  training  which  will  function  in 
earning  a  livelihood  for  these  unfortunates. — Henry  C.  Wright,  Director  of  Survey 
(Pamphlet).     New  York:   Committee  on  After-Care  of  Infantile  Paralysis  Cases. 

R.  D.  G. 

Industrial  Morale. — Industrial  morale  refers  to  the  degree  of  co-operation  extended 
by  the  employees  of  an  enterprise  to  the  management  in  the  course  of  their  work. 
Fatigue,  ill  health,  nervous  strain,  the  belief  that  workmen  will  work  themselves  out 
of  their  jobs,  dissatisfaction  of  the  workers  with  the  management,  and  the  belief 
among  the  workers  that  the  burdens  and  benefits  in  society  are  too  unevenly  dis- 
tributed, create  low  industrial  morale.     Industrial  unrest  is  also  due  to  the  "getting" 


668  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

rather  than  "gi\-ing"  philosophy.  Business  men  frankly  admit  that  they  are  in 
business  not  primarily  to  render  service,  but  to  make  money.  The  workmen's  low 
morale  equally  results  from  fear  and  resentment  inspired  among  the  workers  by  certain 
managerial  policies.  The  feeling  of  unimportance  fostered  among  workmen  by  their 
submergence  in  the  vastness  of  industrial  establishments  and  the  policy  pursued  by 
many  managements  in  building  up  in  the  men  the  feeling  that  they  are  of  little  impor- 
tance, prevent  the  workmen  from  appreciating  the  importance  of  their  work.  In 
addition,  failure  of  managements  to  recognize  merit  and  good  service  and  the  lack  of 
material  rewards  for  merit  naturally  lead  workmen  to  feel  that  the  management 
does  not  appreciate  good  service.  The  transitory  and  precarious  nature  of  employ- 
ment and  the  impersonal  relation  that  exists  between  the  workmen  and  industry  tend 
also  to  create  a  gulf  between  the  men  and  the  owners  of  capital.  Labor  cannot  be 
expected  to  give  its  best  effort  to  industry  until  industry,  instead  of  being  the  servant 
of  capital  and  the  master  of  labor,  is  the  joint  servant  of  them  both,  devoted  equally 
to  the  advancement  of  the  interests  of  each. — Sumner  H.  Slichter,  The  Quarterly 
Journal  of  Economics,  November,  1920.  C.  N. 

Social  Control  of  Industrial  Strife. — The  objective  of  society  should  be  to  eliminate 

premature,  unnecessary,  and  unjust  strikes  and  lockouts  without  closing  the  door  to 
the  usefulness  of  the  strike  in  appropriate  cases  as  a  last  resort.  The  following  classes 
of  strikes  should  be  considered  as  illegitimate:  (i)  strikes  against  democracy  in  order 
to  control  or  influence  political  action,  as  such  acts  are  revolutionarj'  and  lay  the  ax 
at  the  very  root  of  self-government;  (2)  strikes  which  unduly  injure  the  public,  such 
as  a  general  railroad  strike  which  can  paralyze  industry,  commerce,  and  many 
of  the  functions  of  government  in  times  of  peace  and  war,  and  make  millions  of  inno- 
cent people  suffer  from  such  antisocial  action;  (3)  strikes  against  liberty  seeking  to 
curtail  the  rights  of  an  employee  to  work  regardless  of  imion  membership;  (4)  strikes 
against  neutrals  or  sympathetic  strikes  which  directly  injure  those  against  whom  the 
strikers  have  no  grievance;  (5)  strikes  before  presenting  grievances,  for  to  call  strikes 
in  advance  of  negotiations  may  be  the  wanton  and  malicious  infliction  of  injury; 
(6)  strikes  in  violation  of  reasonable  agreements;  (7)  strikes  in  violation  of  an  arbitra- 
tion award;  and  (8)  strikes  where  arbitration  is  available  by  a  disinterested  tribunal. 
Public  opinion  would  certainly  be  united  on  the  proposition  that  strikes  in  violation 
of  the  eight  fimdamental  principles  we  have  pointed  out  are  in  violation  of  sound 
public  policy  and  should  be  generally  discouraged. — Walter  G.  Merritt,  The  Unpartizan 
Review,  January  and  March,  192 1.  C.  N. 

L'Enseignement  du  Bolchevisme  dans  le  Monde. — The  influence  of  bolshevism 
outside  Russia  is  exercised  not  only  on  adults,  for  in  London  the  Socialists  have 
organized  socialist  Sunday  schools  where  the  children  are  taught  that  the  regeneration 
of  humanity  requires  a  "bath  of  blood."  The  Young  Socialist  League  boasts  nine 
branches  in  London.  The  International  School  Movement  (British  section)  is  showing 
the  young  "how  to  bring  about  the  inauguration  of  the  Social  Industrial  Republic 
by  the  Dictatorship  of  the  Proletariat."  Social  reforms  are  regarded  as  playthings 
like  the  congresses  of  the  trade  unions.  The  ideal  is  revolution  in  the  Russian  manner. 
According  to  the  Journal  of  Commerce  of  New  York  of  July  i,  there  are  in  the  United 
States  seventy-one  colleges  and  universities  where  the  teaching  of  bolshevism  has 
penetrated.  In  France  many  teachers  are  impregnated  with  bolshevism.  Article  23 
of  the  constitution  of  the  League  of  Nations  has  been  inserted  in  the  peace  treaty, 
ad  majorem  Marxi  gloriam.  Fully  a  third  of  the  treaty  is  a  consecration  of  socialistic 
dogmas,  denying  economic  truths,  and  calling  for  the  organization  of  an  international 
policy  of  labor  which  will  give  the  laborers  privileges  permitting  them  to  despoil  their 
fellow-citizens  with  the  help  of  foreigners.  One  should  not  look  in  Russia  for  the 
dictatorship  of  the  proletariat:  it  has  been  instituted  in  the  treaty  of  peace. — 
N.  Mondet,  Journal  des  Economisles,  December,  1920.  V.  M.  A. 

Le  Mouvement  Economique  et  Social. — It  seems  that  a  wave  of  pessimism  is 
sweeping  over  Germany  today.  Many  laborers  think  that  the  leaders  of  socialism 
are  much  more  occupied  with  their  own  interests  than  with  the  general  interests  of 
the  country.    The  government  is  further  embarrassed  because  there  is  a  widespread 


RECENT  LITERATURE  669 

temptation  to  render  it  responsible  for  the  great  financial  difliculties  of  the  present. 
The  Germans  will  not  understand  that  the  situation  is  the  consequence  of  the  stub- 
bornness with  which  they  prolonged  a  struggle  which  could  not  end  to  their  advantage. 
The  financial  situation  fortunately  paralj'zes  the  bellicose  desires  of  the  German 
people.  Relying  on  the  book  of  Keynes,  which  has  had  a  great  popularity  in  Germany, 
they  insist  upon  the  economic  interdependence  of  peoples,  that  in  the  weakened 
condition  of  Europe  all  must  save  reciprocally  as  much  as  possible.  France  is  accused 
of  wishing  to  strangle  Germany.  It  is  with  the  neutral  countries  that  Germany  hopes 
to  re-estabhsh  commercial  relations.  The  Germans  also  have  to  create  a  whole 
constitutional  organization,  and  to  the  difliculties  involved  in  internal  reorganization 
are  added  those  of  exterior  politics. — Georges  Blondel,  La  Rejorme  Sociale, 
September-October,  1920.  V.  M.  A. 

Population  and  Progress. — The  most  persistent  cause  of  war  is  the  overgrowth 
of  population.  That  consideration  alone  is  sufficient  reason  for  urging  that  it  is  the 
duty  of  all  nations  deliberately  to  control  their  inherent  capacity  for  increase.  A 
stronger  consideration  is  this:  that  in  any  large  population  a  low  birth-rate  is  a 
necessary  condition  of  racial  progress.  This  proposition  holds  for  plant  and  animal 
life  as  well  as  for  human  beings.  High  birth-rates  may  be  desirable  for  small  popula- 
tions with  limitless  opportunities  for  expansion  but  are  impossible  for  large  populations 
already  short  of  elbow-room,  except  on  the  condition  that  a  high  infantile  mortality 
shall  keep  pace  with  the  high  birth-rate.  Weeds  and  insects  have  no  lack  of  offspring 
but  the  survival  rate  is  one-hundredth  or  one-thousandth  of  the  birth-rate.  A  similar 
consideration  applies  to  many  of  the  races  of  mankind  and  notably  to  the  Chinese. 
In  China  "infanticide,  rebellions,  and  disease,  swift  slaying  famine,  or  slow  starva- 
tion," keep  the  population  within  the  limits  of  subsistence.  The  western  countries 
of  Europe  with  their  relatively  low  birth-rates  have  much  lower  rates  of  infantile 
mortality  than  India,  China,  or  Russia.  It  is  urban  overcrowding  which  creates  the 
gravest  of  England's  problems  today.  For  various  practical  reasons  the  problem 
cannot  be  solved  either  by  transference  of  industries  to  the  country  or  by  immigration 
within  the  empire.  The  numbers  are  too  vast  to  be  dealt  with  by  these  methods. 
Unless  these  numbers  are  reduced  by  deliberate  birth  control  there  can  be  no  wide- 
spread racial  improvement  and  no  appreciable  betterment  of  the  general  conditions 
of  life. — Harold  Cox,  Edinburgh  Review,  October,  1920.  O.  B.  Y. 

Labor  Evolution  and  Social  Revolution. — From  the  hour  of  the  Armistice,  class 
sentiment  and  national  disunion  have  reasserted  their  sinister  sway  with  redoubled 
force.  Labor  believes  that  it  can  exercise  the  dominating  power  in  the  state.  Other 
classes  feel  that  their  actual  existence  is  threatened  by  the  claims  set  up  by  labor. 
To  accomplish  their  purpose  the  manual  workers  have  built  up  the  trade-union  move- 
ment in  which  the  temperamental  and  intellectual  characteristics  of  their  leaders 
are  reflected.  Trade  unionism  thrives  (i)  under  the  leadership  of  a  conservative, 
Victorian  tvpe  of  leader  who  always  takes  a  specific  line  at  conferences  and  congresses 
when  he  knows  that  it  is  a  safe  line  for  his  own  interests;  (2)  the  Marxian  type  of 
leader  who  stands  for  industrial  unionism  and  who  points  with  a  triumphant  finger 
to  the  giant  amalgamations  of  the  miners,  railway  ser\-ants,  and  the  transport  workers 
as  instruments  for  the  realization  of  his  dreams  of  Soviet  rule;  (3)  the  leader  of  the 
All-Red  Doctrinaire  Communists.  This  group  has  openly  repudiated  its  former 
adhesion  to  the  democratic  faith,  for  this  party  stands  for  the  dictatorship  of  the 
proletariat.  The  aftermaths  of  the  war  on  British  temperament,  the  profiteering  of 
profit-mongers,  and  constant  prolongation  of  the  peace  negotiations — all  these  have 
prepared  the  social  fuel  for  a  vast  conflagration.  So  long  as  trade  unionism  was  used 
as  a  weapon  of  defense  against  profiteering,  or  as  machinery  for  improving  the  working 
conditions,  it  was  a  legitimate  instrument  of  industrial  progress.  But  when  the  same 
implement  is  used  against  the  state  to  coerce  the  government  in  regard  to  political 
questions,  it  becomes  not  only  illegal  but  treasonable. — Victor  Fisher,  The  Nineteenth 
Century  and  After,  October,  1920.  C.  N. 

Is  Industrial  Peace  Possible? — The  world-war  has  resulted  in  an  intensification 
■of  that  class  hatred  which  was  first  analyzed  by  Marx.     Labor  is  beating  no  longer 


670  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

against  the  introduction  of  machinery,  but  against  the  institution  of  profit.  As  the 
worker  is  a  wage-slave  he  is  constantly  spurred  by  the  fear  of  unemployment  and 
he  therefore  will  not  continue  to  produce  for  private  profit.  The  present  industrial 
system  has  only  one  possible  development,  namely,  the  gradual  formation  of  gigantic 
trusts  on  the  one  hand,  and  the  trade  unions  with  universal  membership  upon  the 
other.  The  whole  situation  presents  the  conflict  of  a  sullen  revolt  and  of  desperate, 
nervous  resistance.  The  present  system  stands  condemned  and  it  can  be  abolished 
by  the  substitution  of  a  system  which  will  allow  present  wage-earners  to  share  in 
the  prosperity  of  their  industry  to  a  far  greater  extent,  and  which  >ivill  eliminate  the 
objectionable  features  of  fixed  wages,  possible  unemployment,  profiteering,  and  the 
sleeping  partnership  of  labor  in  industrial  control.  This  objective  would  result  in 
improvement  in  status  and  improvement  in  income.  The  right  understanding  of 
the  industrial  situation  and  economic  education  are  necessary  for  the  workers  and 
employers  to  achieve  these  ends.  The  system  of  co-partnership  is  the  only  practi- 
cable working  out  of  the  gospel  of  the  identity  of  the  interests  of  all  those  engaged 
in  industry. — Colin  R.  Coote,  The  Nifieteenth  Century  and  After,  September,  1920. 

C.N. 

Der  Familiengerichtshof. — Dr.  Fehlinger  discusses  W.  H.  Liebman's  paper  on 
"Domestic  Relations  Courts,"  read  before  the  conference  of  Jewish  Social  Workers  in 
Atlantic  City,  1919.  These  courts  should  have  complete  jurisdiction  in  the  following 
cases:  (i)  desertion  and  non-support;  (2)  parental  responsibility;  (3)  juvenile 
delinquency  as  well  as  all  cases  of  contribution  toward  it;  (4)  adoption  and  guardian- 
ship; (5)  divorce  and  alimony.  The  courts  should  have  full  advantage  of  all  medical, 
social,  psychological,  and  other  expert  advice;  should  maintain  their  own  psychological 
stations  and  should  conduct  all  familial  problems  in  private.  Society  and  not  the 
individual  should  be  the  unit  of  welfare  interest.  And  the  whole  atmosphere  of  the 
court  should  be  as  little  official  and  as  tactfully  intimate  as  possible,  using  its  judicial 
authority,  even  its  probation  powers,  only  as  a  last  resort. — Dr.  H.  Fehlinger, 
Zeitschrift  fiir  Sexualwissenschaft,  September,  1920.  R.  S. 

Co-operative  Community  Building. — The  things  in  which  farmers  have  a  common 
interest  and  which  every  farmer  and  community  ought  to  foster  are:  (i)  good  farming 
which  lies  at  the  root  of  good  living  and  of  good  community  building.  Every  farmer 
has  a  right  to  expect  that  his  neighbor  shall  not  rob  posterity  by  a  soil-depleting 
system;  (2)  good  schools  are  a  matter  of  common  interest.  Community  effort  is 
necessary  to  educate  public  opinion  to  the  needs  of  rural  schools;  (3)  the  betterment 
of  roads,  for  they  are  important  for  the  transit  of  commodities,  persons,  and  the 
exchange  of  ideas.  Communication  is  the  first  requisite  of  any  form  of  social  organiza- 
tion; (4)  good  churches  are  necessary,  for  good  country  life  depends  on  well-supported 
and  ably  ministered  churches;  (5)  good  recreational  facilities  for  young  people  and 
grown-ups  alike.  The  open  country  has  little  organized  recreation;  (6)  the  production 
of  good  farm  products  and  of  disposing  of  them  honestly  adds  to  personal,  social, 
and  business  values  alike;  (7)  the  protection  of  rural  government  and  rural  legislation 
from  the  incumbrances  which  so  easily  attach  themselves  to  governmental  activities; 
(8)  the  dissemination  of  hygienic  and  sanitary  knowledge.  The  purpose  of  rural 
organization  is  so  to  relate  and  adjust  the  forces,  organized  and  unorganized,  that 
the  best  economic  and  social  standards  of  that  unit  shall  be  maintained. — Albert 
R.  Mann,  The  Southern  Workman,  August,  1920.  C.  N. 

Infant  Welfare  Affected  by  Class  Distinctions  and  National  Traits. — The 
economic  and  social  status  of  the  mother  has  a  great  deal  to  do  with  infant  welfare. 
The  rich  mother  is  unwilling  to  nurse  her  baby,  because  it  interferes  with  her  social 
duties.  She  can,  however,  get  possible  substitutes  in  place  of  breast  milk.  The 
poor  mother  who  is  anxious  to  nurse  her  baby  presents  the  biggest  problem.  For 
financial  reasons  she  must  go  out  of  the  home  to  add  to  the  family  livelihood.  .Accord- 
ing to  the  degree  of  co-operation  they  give  the  physician  and  nurse  the  mothers  may 
be  classified  into  three  classes:  (i)  the  American  (white)  mother  who  does  not  present 
special  problems  in  connection  with  infant-welfare  work,  except  those  peculiar  to 
social  conditions;    (2)  the  colored  mother  who  presents  the  problems  of  extreme 


RECENT  LITERATURE  671 

youthfulness,  many  of  whom  are  only  sixteen  or  seventeen  years  of  age  and  the 
problem  of  illegitimacy  of  children.  Besides,  from  95  to  98  per  cent  of  colored  infants 
suffer  from  rickets  in  one  form  or  another.  Furthermore,  the  matter  of  tradition 
and  superstitution  may  to  a  certain  extent  interfere  with  good  hygiene;  (3)  the  mother 
of  foreign  birth  who  does  not  see  the  necessity  of  going  to  see  a  doctor  or  nurse  with 
a  well  baby.  Many  foreign  mothers  have  to  assist  in  the  earning  of  a  livelihood  and 
they  cannot  devote  their  entire  time  to  their  children.  Besides  the  large  number  of 
children  among  the  foreign-born  makes  their  economic  problem  more  acute. — A. 
Levinson,  Modern  Medicine,  October,  1920.  C.  N. 

The  School  as  an  Agency  in  Preventing  Social  Liabilities. — For  the  purposes 
of  our  discussion  we  shall  divide  our  problem  into  five  distinctive  fields:  (i)  the 
problem  of  the  feeble-minded  of  whom  some  states  handle  only  one-tenth  of  the 
known  defectives  at  large.  To  provide  for  this  group  of  social  defectives  the  state 
program  should  include  a  criterion  for  identification  of  the  feeble-minded,  efBcient 
state  registration,  some  standard  of  education,  segregation  and  colonziation,  and 
public  education  as  regards  financial  and  moral  support  to  limit  the  drain  upon  state 
resources;  (2)  the  delinquent  who  presents  a  complex  of  environmental  conditions, 
heredity,  mental  make-up,  and  general  disposition  which  makes  for  anti-social  con- 
duct. Physiological  investigation  and  research  should  be  used  to  determine  personal 
manifestations  which  are  delinquent;  (3)  the  dependent — our  public  schools  have 
failed  to  develop  those  aptitudes  and  potentialities  which  might  have  made  for 
efficient  living;  (4)  the  psjxhopathic  surveys  reveal  that  five  out  of  every  one  hundred 
children  present  some  symptoms  of  mental  maladjustment  and  yet  mental-hygiene 
me£isures  find  no  place  in  our  routine  handling  of  children.  Preventive  mental- 
hygiene  program  should  include  methods  through  which  defectives  can  be  adequately 
studied  and  encouragement  of  free  activity  should  replace  repressive  tendencies; 
(5)  the  gifted  child  should  receive  special  attention  so  that  there  would  be  no  wastage 
of  human  and  economic   resources. — S.  C.  Kohs,  School  mid  Society,  October,  1920. 

C.  N. 

Rassenbiologie. — Our  worship  of  mechanical  and  industrial  civilization  and 
the  rampant  individualism  of  our  age  with  its  complex  corollary  of  immoralities  has 
a  physiologically  definitely  deteriorating  effect  upon  modern  man.  To  this  deteriora- 
tion the  "policy  of  the  empty  cradle"  heavilj^  contributes.  The  author  also  deplores 
the  bad  eugenic  effects  of  race  mixture.  He  considers  the  "pure  Nordic  races"  of 
a  much  higher  variety  than  the  Balkan  race  mixture  and,  especially,  than  the  "blood 
chaos"  of  Middle  and  South  America.  Hybridization,  industrialization,  and  also 
the  "proletarization  of  the  rural  stock"  are,  in  his  eyes,  the  causes  of  race  degeneration. 
As  a  remedy  he  suggests  biological  research  institutes  whose  eugenic  findings  should 
be  given  the  wide  publicity  of  an  educative  campaign. — H.  Lundberg,  Die  Umschau, 
9.  Heft,  1920.  B.  S. 

Reaching  the  Immigrant  through  Books. — The  extent  of  the  problem  of  Ameri- 
canization can  be  seen  from  the  following  statistics:  from  July  i,  1900,  to  June  i,  1918, 
more  than  14,000,000  immigrants  came  into  this  country.  Approximately  75  per 
cent  of  the  workers  employed  in  American  industries  are  either  foreign-bom  or  the 
children  of  foreign-born  parents.  In  refining  of  sugar  85  per  cent  of  wage-earners 
are  foreign-born;  in  manufacture  of  clothing,  72  per  cent;  in  manufacture  of  agri- 
cultural implements,  6  per  cent;  in  iron  and  steel  industries,  58  per  cent.  We  are 
agreed  that  this  vast  population  of  alien  origin  should  be  imbued  as  thoroughly  as 
possible  with  the  best  traditions  and  ideals  of  America.  How  shall  these  men  know 
what  America  means  to  us  and  what  it  may  mean  to  themselves  and  to  their  children, 
unless  there  is  placed  before  them  the  story  of  the  first  European  immigrants  and 
their  struggles  with  untamed  savages  and  wild  beasts  and  with  nature's  elementary 
forces?  This  knowledge  that  is  so  fundamental  can  be  best  acquired  through  the 
medium  of  books.  The  interpretation  of  American  institutions  and  ideals  to  the 
immigrant  must  involve  a  somewhat  extensive  publication  of  books  interpreting 
those  institutions  and  ideals  in  foreign  languages.  Just  as  I  would  not  suppress  the 
foreign-language  newspapers,  as  so  many  people  who  seem  to  me  to  be  misguided 


672  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

in  their  patriotism  want  to  do,  so  I  would  not  discourage  the  extensive  publication 
in  foreign  languages  of  books  which  will  help  to  make  America  understood  and  beloved 
by  those  who  are  able  only  to  read  those  languages.  A  popular  history  of  America 
has  recently  come  oflf  the  press,  printed  in  Italian  and  English  text  on  alternate  pages. 
This  idea  should  be  applied  extensively  to  the  publication  of  books  intended  for 
immigrants,  at  once  interpreting  America  and  facilitating  their  acquisition  of  America's 
language.  At  least  the  experiment  should  be  made  upon  a  large  enough  scale  to 
determine  its  value  beyond  question.  Finally,  such  books  should  be  printed  on 
cheap  paper  with  paper  covers  so  as  to  make  the  price  of  such  books  within  the 
financial  reach  of  the  poor  immigrant. — John  Spargo,  American  Journal  of  Education, 
September  2,  1920.  K.  E.  B. 

Child-Welfare  Standards. — A  new  standard  has  been  proposed  by  the  Children's 
Bureau,  which  goes  into  some  detail.  An  outline  covers  the  following  topics:  (i) 
Minimum  standards  for  children  entering  employment:  (a)  mhiimum  age — sixteen 
years  in  all  occupations;  eighteen  years  in  mines  and  quarries;  twenty-one  years 
for  girls  as  telephone  or  telegraph  messengers;  twenty-one  years  for  special-delivery 
service  of  United  States  Post-office;  prohibition  of  minors  in  dangerous,  unhealthy, 
or  hazardous  occupations;  {b)  minwium  education — compulsory  education  for  ail 
seven  to  sixteen  years  for  nine  months  per  year.  Between  sbcteen  and  eighteen 
those  legally  and  regularly  employed,  compulsory  attendance  at  continuation  schools 
at  least  eight  hours  per  week;  (c)  physical  minimum — annual  examination  of  all 
working  children  under  eighteen  years  of  age;  prohibition  from  work  unless  found  to 
be  of  normal  development  for  a  child  of  his  age  and  physicallj^  fit  for  the  work  at 
which  he  is  to  be  employed;  {d)  hours — minors  not  more  than  eight  hours  a  day 
or  forty-four  hours  a  week.  Time  at  continuation  school  to  count  as  part  of  working 
day.  Prohibition  of  night  work  for  minors  between  6  p.m.  and  7  a.m.;  (e)  'u;age 
— minimum  necessary  for  "cost  of  proper  living,"  as  determined  by  a  minimum-wage 
commission  or  other  similar  official  board;  (/)  placement  and  employment  supervision — 
adequate  provision  for  advising  children  when  they  leave  school  of  the  employment 
opportunities  open  to  them;  supervision  during  first  few  years  of  employment;  (g) 
employment  certificate.  (2)  Minimum  standards  for  public  protection  of  health  of 
mothers  and  children:  (a)  maternity;  (6)  infants  and  pre-school  children;  (c)  school 
children;  {d)  adolescent  children.  (3)  Minimum  standards  relating  to  children  in 
need  of  special  care:  (a)  adequate  income;  {b)  assistance  to  mothers;  (c)  state 
supervision;  {d)  removal  of  children  from  their  homes;  (e)  home  care;  (/)  principles 
governing  child-placing;  (g)  children  in  institutions;  {h)  care  of  children  born  out  of 
wedlock;  (i)  care  of  physically  defective  children;  {j)  mental  hygiene  and  care  of 
mentally  defective  children;  {k)  juvenile  courts;  (/)  rural  social  work;  (w)  scientific 
information.  (4)  General  minimum  standards:  (a)  economic  and  social  standards; 
(6)  recreation;  (c)  child- welfare  legislation. — Julia  C.  Lathrop,  Chief  of  Children's 
Bureau,  The  Child,  August,  1920.  K.  E.  B. 

Medical  and  Allied  Professions  as  a  State  Service. — At  present  preventive 
medicine  is  state  controlled.  Why  should  not  curative  medicine  also  be  state  con- 
trolled? The  doctor  would  then  be  to  the  whole  public  what  the  club  doctor  is  now 
to  a  section  of  it.  He  would  be  a  state  official,  salaried  and  pensioned  as  such.  We 
should  be  able  to  summon  a  state-paid  physician  for  a  broken  leg,  pneumonia,  or 
insanity  just  the  same  as  one  can  do  in  Canada  in  case  of  measles  or  diphtheria. 
Hospitals  would  then  become  state  institutions  just  as  prisons,  penitentiaries,  and 
asylums  are  now.  The  Indian  medical  service  affords  an  example  of  a  state-managed 
medical  service.  Promotions,  disability  pensions,  retiring  pensions,  etc.,  would  be 
arranged  for  as  in  the  civil  service.  A  state  medical  service  would  carry  out  measures 
to  prevent  disease,  but  the  measures  would  emanate  from  legislative  bodies.  It 
should  advise  Congress,  county,  city  councils,  and  other  public  bodies.  It  should 
suggest  legislation.  It  should  not  only  treat  all  the  sick  but  educate  the  community 
in  the  ways  of  healthy  living.  The  best  advice  and  treatment  would  then  be  placed 
within  the  reach  of  every  person  in  the  community.  Because  of  the  expense  involved 
in  modern  diagnoses,  such  as  X-ray,  chemical  tests,  sera  diagnoses,  etc.,  only  the 


RECENT  LITERATURE  673 

well-to-do  can  afford  such  medical  service.  The  best  medical  service  should  not 
continue  to  be  a  special  privilege  of  the  rich  or  the  gift  of  charity  that  pauperizes. 
The  health  of  the  nation  should  be  looked  after  in  a  manner  similar  to  that  in  which 
any  other  national  concern  is  managed — war,  law,  trade,  agriculture,  or  fisheries. 
If  fighting  and  law  are  considered  such  honorable  state  services,  why  may  the  equally 
noble  profession  of  medicine  not  be  so  considered? 

The  state  service  would  conserve  the  health  of  all  our  social  groups — the  army, 
navy,  civil  servants,  inmates  of  prisons,  asylums,  boys  and  girls  in  reformatories, 
defective  children,  the  blind,  deaf,  dumb,  immigrants,  and,  equally  important,  those 
who  constitute  the  "public"  in  general.  Such  state  service  would  make  present 
amateur  efforts  of  supervised  health  of  school  children  superfluous.  A  part  of  such 
state  service  would  also  be  investigation  of  all  problems  of  public  sanitation,  such  as 
adulteration  of  food;  the  storing,  cleansing,  and  distribution  of  water;  inspection  of 
ventilation;  quarantine;  prophylactic  inoculation;  etc.  It  would  organize,  direct, 
and  reward  research.  AH  qualified  men  would  become  registered  in  the  national 
service,  the  quacks  and  irregular  practitioners  would  soon  be  exposed  and  got  rid  of. 
Osteopaths  would  become  licensed  masseurs  and  nothing  else.  "Homeopaths"  and 
"faith-healers"  would  cease  to  be  because  they  would  not  possess  the  state  license 
to  practice.  The  pay  of  all  would  not  be  equal;  there  would  be  different  grades  the 
same  as  in  the  post-ofl&ce  department.  This  is  neo-socialism,  socialism  in  excelsis 
which  has  absolutely  nothing  to  do  with  the  socialism  of  the  red  tie  and  the  leveling- 
down  to  hopeless  vulgarity.  Therefore,  for  this  neo-socialism  a  name  is  needed; 
I  would  suggest  "co-operationism."  Individualism,  often  heroic  beyond  all  de- 
scription, was  sufiicient  for  the  earlier,  ruder,  simpler,  and  smaller  communities;  but 
co-operation,  the  organized  working  for  the  common  good,  is  the  goal  we  aim  at  in 
this  newer  and  truer  socialism. — Fraser  Harris,  M.D.,  Scientific  Monthly,  September, 
1920.  K.  E.  B. 

Americanization. — We  have  eighteen  million  children  in  our  public  schools  today 
who  are  in  need  of  Americanization.  We  must  supply  them  with  red-blooded, 
healthy,  educated,  cultured  teachers — American  in  spirit  and  training.  But  we  must 
not  crowd  forty  or  fifty  pupils  into  one  badly  ventilated  and  poorly  lighted  room. 
One  step  further  in  this  process  of  Americanization  is  to  teach  the  words  and  then 
translate  them  into  the  thought  and  action  of  the  pupils — "We  hold  these  truths  to 
be  self-evident,  that  all  men  are  created  equal,  that  they  are  endowed  by  their  Creator 
with  certain  inalienable  rights;  that  among  these  are  life,  liberty,  and  the  pursuit 
of  happiness."  To  secure  the  right  to  "life"  means  giving  to  everyone  a  square  deal. 
Do  you  believe  there  is  a  profiteer  in  America  today  who  did  not  cheat  in  the  spelling 
lessons  long  ago,  or  cheat  in  games,  or  bully  the  smaller  boys?  Liberty!  Liberty 
in  America  means  that  we  set  people  free  to  live  and  grow  and  develop  into  the  best 
for  which  they  are  intended,  and  free  to  be  helpful.  Let  us  remind  our  boys  and 
girls  that  liberty  does  not  mean  freedom  to  do  as  they  please.  It  does  mean  freedom 
to  build  up  and  to  help.  We  believe  most  earnestly  in  freedom  of  the  press  and 
freedom  of  speech.  We  often  hear  soap-bo.x  orators  inciting  their  hearers  to  the 
verge  of  treason.  But  how  much  less  harmful  are  such  men  spouting  like  geysers 
on  the  street  than  plotting  in  cellars!  Happiness!  This  does  not  mean  money  for 
all  the  "movies"  to  which  we  want  to  go.  It  does  not  mean  wealth  or  power  or 
comforts.  It  means  ability  to  grow.  Happiness  for  each  child  means  that  he  shall 
have  a  right  to  develop  his  ability  and  win  the  respect  of  the  community.  It  means 
that  the  children  give  to  the  son  of  the  Italian  street  vendor  the  same  rights  in  class 
and  on  the  playground  as  to  the  son  of  the  doctor,  lawyer,  or  wealthy  manufacturer. 
— Jessie  L.  BurroU,  Chief  of  School  Service,  National  Geographic  Society,  American 
Edtication,  October,  1920.  K.  E.  B. 

American- Japanese  Problem. — The  essential  cause  of  the  anti- Japanese  feeling 
that  has  arisen  in  some  parts  of  America  is  not  any  racial  difference  or  any  alien  ways 
of  social  life — it  is  the  incompatibility  of  labor  ways  and  standards.  The  trouble 
is,  above  all  else,  economic;  and  it  has  arisen  out  of  the  so-called  human  "struggle 
for  existence."  After  large  numbers  of  Asiatics  came  to  the  Pacific  Coast,  the  slogan 
cry  became,  "We  are  ruined  by  Chinese  cheap  labor."    This  was  an  economic,  not 


674 


TEE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 


a  mere  racial,  outburst.  It  was  the  protest  of  American  work-people  against  a  struggle 
with  rivals  who  underbid  them  for  wages.  And  they  declared,  "The  Chinese  must 
go."  Later,  when  Japanese  emigration  to  America  began,  no  one  was  more  welcome 
to  the  country  than  the  Japanese  as  tourist,  official,  student,  or  merchant.  There 
was  no  protest  of  any  kind  until  the  Japanese  low-class  workman  came,  and  gave 
reason  to  have  turned  against  him  1;he  same  complaint  about  his  success  by  means  of 
cheap  labor.  If  the  situations  were  reversed,  I  am  sure  that  the  Japanese  would 
act  similarly  to  the  United  States.  The  Japanese  would  oppose  the  incoming  into 
Japan  of  hosts  of  Chinese,  or  Siamese,  or  Malays,  or  Hindoos,  who  would  take  a 
masterful  hold  in  their  factories,  in  their  trades,  or  in  their  paddy-fields,  and  work 
these  national  rescources  for  all  they  could  produce  even  at  the  same  wages  that  the 
Japanese  themselves  are  getting.  If  Japanese  labor  should  once  become  well 
organized  at  home  and  brought  into  a  real  working  co-operation  with  the  organized 
labor  of  the  world,  so  that  common  standards  of  wages  and  living  were  gained,  the 
great  barriers  to  an  interchange  of  residence  would  greatly  lessen.  If  the  Japanese 
workman  should  receive  in  Japan  the  same  wages  that  he  would  receive  in  America, 
he  would  probably  not  wish  to  emigrate  to  America.  And  if  the  American  workman 
should  not  find  a  destructive  rival  in  his  Japanese  neighbor,  he  would  soon  see  that 
his  other  reasons  for  opposition  would  grow  much  less  in  importance. — Dr.  Clay 
MacCauley,  Japan  Review,  October,  1920.  K.  E.  B. 

Geburtsriickgang  und  Gesetzgebung  nach  dem  Kriege. — The  author  pleads  for  a 
"qualitative  attention  to  the  race  rather  than  a  quantitative  one."  He  discusses 
more  the  juridical  phases  and  implications  of  birth-control  than  the  ethical.  It  is 
bad  legal  psychology  to  prohibit  unenforceable  behavior.  Besides,  the  "unborn 
fruit  of  the  female  body  is  pars  viscerum,"  and  hence  woman  has  a  right  to  protect 
her  body  from  conception  and  its  consequences.  He  also  points  out  that  the  inter- 
national democratic  movements,  especially  the  various  forms  of  the  socialist  movement, 
join  the  men  of  science  in  the  defense  of  neo-Malthusianism.  (The  American  Labor 
Movement,  on  the  whole,  is  against  neo-Malthusianism.) — Dr.  Hirsch-Ulm,^ rcAo^o/ogie 
,  Krim.,  1920,  i.  Heft,  S.  74.  B,  S. 

Vocational  Education  as  a  Preventive  of  Juvenile  Delinquency. — Pauperism  and 
lack  of  education  whereby  one  may  earn  an  adequate  living  are  the  direct  causes  of  a 
very  large  percentage  of  crime  and  juvenile  delinquency.  Nearly  70  per  cent  of  the 
children  in  this  country  do  not  get  beyond  the  sixth  grade  in  our  public  schools. 
Ninety  per  cent  of  all  children  in  the  United  States  between  the  ages  of  fourteen  and 
sixteen  are  out  of  school,  and  50  per  cent  of  those  have  only  a  fifth-grade  education 
or  less.  Most  of  these  children  remain  out  of  school  because  of  wrong  teaching 
methods.  Between  70  and  80  per  cent  of  the  child  labor  is  due  to  a  distaste  on  the 
part  of  the  child  for  teacher  and  school.  Most  delinquents  come  from  boys  who 
leave  school  at  or  before  fourteen  years  of  age.  Proper  technical  and  industrial  training 
would  tend  to  remove  many  of  the  causes  of  pauperism  and  delinquency.  The  child 
should  be  trained  to  work  at  some  useful  art.  Vocational  education  directs  surplus 
energy  in  useful  channels,  inhibits  habits  of  licentiousness,  or  the  cravings  for  excite- 
ment and  stimulants,  establishes  a  higher  plane  of  living,  and  creates  new  and  legiti- 
mate wants,  the  satisfaction  of  which  will  arouse  ambition  and  promote  habits  of 
industry.  Social  workers  and  criminologists  were  the  first  to  start  the  campaign  for 
vocational  training. — Arthur  Frank  Payne,  School  and  Society,  November,  1919. 

C.  N. 

Recreation  Facts. — The  Playground  and  Recreation  Association  of  America  has 
attempted  to  determine  how  far  the  war  affected  the  recreation  movement  in  America. 
Information  secured  indicates  that  41  cities  discontinued  work  in  19 18,  and  172  cities 
out  of  277  reported  that  the  effect  of  the  war  on  their  work  had  been  unfavorable. 
A  decrease  in  playground  attendance  was  due  to  the  following  causes:  many  of  the 
older  children  worked  in  factories;  lack  of  competent  leaders;  the  cutting  down  of 
appropriations;  and  the  use  of  playground  property  by  war- work  agencies.  One  hun- 
dred and  five  cities  reported  that  the  war  had  not  affected  them.  Five  hundred  and 
seventy-two  cities  had  some  form  of  playground  and  recreation-center  work;  eighteen 


RECENT  LITERATURE  675 

communities  reported  that  plans  had  been  affected.  In  403  of  the  572  cities  work 
was  under  paid  leadership.  Three  hundred  and  ninety-sLx  cities  employed  8,137 
workers,  3,126  men,  4,qo9  women.  (In  102  instances  sex  was  not  given.)  One  hun- 
dred and  twenty-nine  cities  employed  1,628  workers  the  year  round.  A  total  expendi- 
ture of  $4,891,601  was  reported  by  380  cities.  In  236  cities  the  work  was  supported 
by  municipal  funds,  in  69  by  municipal  and  private,  in  84  by  private,  funds;  143  cities 
reported  818  playgrounds  open  and  lighted  evenings;  loi  cities  conducted  evening 
recreation  work  in  schools;  86  cities  reported  332  buildings  for  recreational  purposes. 
— Abbie  Condit,  Playground,  October,  1919.  C.  N. 

Six  Months'  Americanization  in  Delaware. — The  program  for  Americanization  in 
Delaware  was  first  put  into  operation  in  September,  1918.  It  is  to  be  a  long-time 
program.  A  survey  of  the  conditions,  opportunities,  and  traditions  of  the  foreigners 
is  to  be  made.  Night  schools,  which  were  realized  to  be  both  absolutely  necessary 
and  immediately  possible,  were  started.  Some  of  them  were  held  in  public  schools 
and  others  in  halls  lent  by  the  various  race  groups.  The  teachers  were  given 
some  preliminary  training.  A  simple  book  was  used  as  a  text  and  the  "direct  method" 
was  employed  in  the  classroom.  About  a  thousand  foreigners  attended  the  schools 
while  they  were  open  last  winter  and  spring,  but  it  is  e.vpected  that  twice  as  many 
wiU  be  present  this  season.  A  prime  requisite  for  successful  Americanization  was 
felt  to  be  the  interest  of  the  community,  as  a  community,  in  it.  This  requisite  was 
successfully  created.  Only  such  committees  were  appointed  as  could  be  assigned 
definite  work  to  do.  The  teachers  did  "follow-up"  work  to  keep  the  pupils  regular 
in  their  attendance.  Some  recreation  was  introduced,  but  in  some  cases  it  proved  to 
be  premature,  for  the  foreigners  wanted  to  learn  and  not  to  play.  The  Board  of 
Education  has  now  taken  over  the  night  schools,  and  the  Service  Citizens'  Committee 
will  this  season  devote  itself  to  Americanization  largely  through  social  functions  and 
recreation. — Bulletin  of  the  Service  Citizens  of  Delaware,  September,  1919. 

S.  C.  R. 

France's  First  City-Planning  Law. — Under  the  French  planning  law  passed  last 
March  cities  and  communes  of  more  than  5,000  inhabitants,  within  three  years  of  the 
promulgation  of  the  law,  must  have  plans  formulated  concerning  (i)  the  direction, 
width,  and  location  of  highways,  extent  and  plan  of  squares,  public  spaces,  reserve 
lands,  building  sites,  etc.;  (2)  a  program  for  the  hygienic,  archaeological,  and  aesthetic 
servitudes,  the  height  of  buildings,  provisions  for  drinking-water,  sewers,  waste,  etc. 
Any  settlement  destroyed  by  a  catastrophe,  such  as  fire  or  earthquake,  may  not  be 
restored  until  the  plans  have  been  approved  by  the  commission.^  A  departmental 
plaiming  commission  is  composed  of  local  bodies  in  charge  of  hygiene,  natural  sites, 
etc.,  and  of  four  mayors  appointed  by  the  state.  This  commission  advises  on 
(i)  municipal  schemes,  (2)  derogations  from  the  general  planning  principles,  (3)  inci- 
dental aesthetic  or  hygienic  servitudes  and  other  matters.  A  superior  planning  com- 
mission of  thirty  members  created  by  the  Ministry  of  the  Interior  establishes  planning 
rules  and  regulations  and  gives  advice  on  schemes  referred  to  it.  A  plan  must  be 
submitted  (i)  to  examination  by  the  municipal  council;  (2)  to  a  preliminary  hearing; 

(3)  to  the  examination  of  the  departmental  planning  commission.  The  municipal 
council  then  gives  its  decision  on  the  plan,  after  which  the  state  council  or  other  author- 
ity gives  its  final  approval. — Frank  Backus  Williams,  National  Municipal  Review, 
October,  1919.  C.  N. 

An  Administrative  Ideal  in  Public  Welfare. — The  specific  functions  of  a  state 
department  of  public  welfare  should  be  differentiated  into  the  following  bureaus: 
(i)  a  bureau  of  health,  having  the  duties  and  powers  of  a  state  board  of  health,  and, 
in  addition,  the  administration  of  institutions  for  the  treatment  of  physical  disease 
and  disability;  (2)  a  bureau  of  mental  hygiene,  having  the  duties  and  powers  of  a  state 
board  of  insanity  and  such  additional  duties  as  a  state  program  of  mental  hygiene 
may  require;  (3)  a  bureau  of  social  work,  having  the  duties  and  powers  of  a  state 
board  of  charity  and  such  additional  duties  as  the  ideals  of  social  work  may  require; 

(4)  a  bureau  of  rehabilitation,  having  the  duties  of  a  state  board  of  correction  and  its 
aUied  agencies.    These  bureaus  should  be  co-ordinated  with  each  other  within  the 


676  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

department  of  public  welfare  and  with  other  departments  of  the  state.  Each  should 
be  autonomous  in  its  own  field  under  the  supervision  of  three  expert  directors  appointed 
by  the  governor  of  the  state.  The  twelve  directors  from  these  several  bureaus  should 
constitute  a  commission  of  public  welfare,  having  advisory  and  supervisory  relations 
with  the  several  bureaus.  In  addition  this  commission  should  conduct  the  following 
agencies:  (i)  an  agency  of  research  and  publicity;  (2)  an  agency  of  co-operative 
community  service;  (3)  an  agency  of  co-operative  purchasing.  The  advantages 
claimed  for  this  scheme  are:  (i)  it  co-ordinates  activities  but  does  not  destroy  per- 
sonal initiative;  (2)  it  is  democratic  in  principle  and  practice;  (3)  it  promotes  the 
efficiency  of  the  individual  and  of  the  local  agency,  whose  efiiciency  and  standards 
are  the  measure  and  limitation  of  combined  achievement. — Owen  Copp,  American 
Journal  of  Insanity,  July,  1919.  F.  A.  C. 

Establishment  of  International  Standards  of  Public  Health. — Great  Britain  and 
America  both  desire  an  international  standard  of  public  health  and  welfare  work. 
By  the  co-operation  of  these  two  countries  a  standard  can  be  established  throughout 
the  world.  In  fixing  a  standard  there  must  be  a  careful  analysis  of  each  region; 
second,  the  establishment  of  a  unit  of  public-health  nurse  service  and  the  territory 
she  can  conveniently  handle;  third,  the  correlation  of  these  on  the  basis  of  adaptation 
to  the  region  to  be  handled.  To  push  these  standards  over  the  world  mil  necessitate 
constant  changes  based  upon  knowledge  of  the  language  and  of  the  origin  and  former 
condition  of  the  people  to  be  cared  for.  In  the  international  scholarships  in  public 
health  nursing  there  is  already  a  beginning. — W.  C.  White,  Lancet,  October,  1919. 

D.  H.  K. 

Essential  Units  in  the  Care  of  Tuberculosis. — In  a  complete  scheme  for  the  care 
of  the  tuberculous  there  should  be:  (i)  an  improved  method  of  notification  to  proxade 
fuller  information  regarding  the  type  of  the  disease  and  the  circumstances  of  the 
patient;  (2)  an  efficient  and  co-ordinated  system  of  dispensary  and  domiciliary  treat- 
ment; (3)  the  provision  of  adequate  hospital  accommodation  for  acute  and  advanced 
cases  of  tuberculosis  with  compulsory  powers  of  removal;  (4)  the  provision  of  up-to- 
date  sanitarium  accommodation  with  facilities  for  the  industrial  training  of  patients; 
(5)  the  provision  of  large  hospitals  for  the  conservative  treatment  of  non-pulmonary 
tuberculosis,  each  hospital  to  serve  a  large  district  and  population;  (6)  the  pro- 
vision of  sanitarium  accommodation  for  children  and  of  facilities  for  open-air  instruc- 
tion in  connection  with  hospital,  sanitarium,  and  schools;  (7)  the  incorporation  in 
the  scheme  of  an  after-care  unit  with  an  emigration  and  employment  bureau;  (S)  carry- 
ing out  a  comprehensive  scheme  of  scientific  investigation  and  preventive  effort  with 
a  view  to  the  control  and  final  abolition  of  tuberculosis. — H.  H.  Thomson,  Journal 
of  State  Medicine,  October,  1919.  D.  H.  K. 

The  Co-operative  Movement  in  the  United  States. — The  co-operative  movement, 
or  the  Rochdale  movement,  as  it  is  often  called,  is  one  of  great  social  significance. 
It  tends  to  substitute  for  the  present  system  of  private  profit-taking  a  condition  of 
society  under  which  every  need  of  life,  social  and  economic,  will  be  supplied  by  the 
united  effort  of  all.  While  this  aim  is  revolutionary,  the  method  is  economic  and  not 
political.  The  immediate  object  of  the  movement  is  the  reduction  of  the  cost  of 
living  by  eliminating  the  profits  of  the  middleman.  Certain  of  the  principles  of  the 
Rochdale  co-operators,  which  one  authority  says  must  be  maintained  or  invite  failure, 
are  followed  by  their  American  successors.  They  usually  provide  for  unrestricted 
membership,  shares  of  low  denomination,  one  man  one  vote  regardless  of  stock  owner- 
ship, cash  sales  of  pure  foods  at  prevailing  market  prices,  paj'ment  of  not  more  than 
a  legal  rate  of  interest  on  share  capital,  and  the  return  of  the  "profits"  as  a  dividend  to 
members  in  proportion  to  their  patronage.  Started  in  England  in  1844  by  twenty- 
eight  weavers,  the  Rochdale  system  spread  to  America  in  the  form  of  all  sorts  of 
co-operative  ventures  some  of  which  were  purely  co-operative,  others  political,  and 
some  religious.  Through  bad  management  and  failure  to  adhere  to  the  Rochdale 
principles  nearly  all  of  them  failed.  The  most  notable  examples  of  successful  co- 
operation are  the  California  Fruit  Growers'  Exchange  and  the  various  live-stock 


RECENT  LITERATURE  677 

shippers'  organizations.  Although  there  are  but  meager  data  relative  to  the  extent 
of  the  co-operative  movement  in  the  United  States,  it  is  estimated  that  there  are 
about  three  thousand  consumers'  societies,  having  a  combined  business  of  approxi- 
matel}'  $200,000,000  a  year.  Most  of  the  societies  conform  to  the  open  membership 
policy,  have  shares  of  low  denomination,  and  without  exception  in  the  societies  studied, 
the  principle  of  "one  member  one  vote"  is  strictly  adhered  to.  Sales  are  made  at 
prevailing  market  rates  in  order  not  to  incur  the  hostility  of  other  regular  merchants. 
Dividends  returned  to  members  have  ranged  from  3  to  13  per  cent.  Besides  the 
monetar>'  benefit,  co-operation  has  provided  other  advantages  such  as  a  practical 
education  in  business  methods,  training  for  citizenship,  utilization  of  the  latent  abilities 
of  the  workmen,  and  the  habituation  of  all  men  to  altruistic  modes  of  thought  and 
conduct. — Florence  E.  Parker,  Monthly  Labor  Review,  March,  1920.  C.  V.  R. 

Reactions  of  Welfare  Work  on  Religious  Work. — The  war  brought  thousands  of 
ministers  into  contact  with  the  real  needs  and  actual  problems  of  men.  The  return 
of  this  large  body  of  welfare  workers  to  their  former  tasks  should  be  accompanied  by  a 
revival  of  human  interests  in  the  sphere  of  organized  religion.  There  has  been  a 
shifting  attitude  in  these  religious  workers  due  to  their  close  contact  with  human  needs. 
With  them  the  emphasis  passes  from  doctrine  to  service  and  the  technique  of  religion 
must  be  the  technique  of  everyday  conduct  rather  than  for  specific  times  and  seasons. 
The  church  of  today  ought  to  realize  her  mission  as  a  great  agency  of  social  redemption 
and  that  means  that  the  successful  minister  or  church  worker  must  be  a  practical 
sociologist. 

The  participation  of  so  many  religious  workers  in  welfare  activities  has  resulted 
in  a  growing  consciousness  that  the  time  has  come  for  the  church  to  assume  a  more 
positive  attitude  toward  current  problems  and  movements.  Efforts  for  recreational 
and  entertainment  activities  of  the  community,  endeavors  in  regard  to  public  health, 
the  redemption  of  public  affairs,  the  fight  against  ignorance  and  economic  maladjust- 
ment; all  these  should  have  a  profoundly  religious  motive.  Both  the  existence  and 
the  sen.'icefulness  of  the  church  depends  on  her  ability  to  adjust  herself  and  to  interpret 
the  gospel  to  the  changing  atmosphere.  The  church  should  anticipate  the  world's 
need  with  a  liturgy,  a  hymnolog>',  and  a  gospel  that  will  answer  to  the  awakened 
social  consciousness. — Angus  S.  Woodburne,  Biblical  World,  May,  1920.      R.  G.  H. 

A  Program  of  Americanization. — To  have  any  program  of  Americanization  we 
must  agree  on  the  characteristic  qualities  which  constitute  the  American  type.  This 
type  can  be  distinguished  politically  and  socially.  Politically,  the  American  prin- 
ciple is  that  everybody  shares  in  the  democracy;  socially,  the  American  principle  is 
that  people  must  work  together  to  accomplish  an  object,  but  that  each  member  of  the 
group  retains  the  right  of  original  opinion  and  original  contribution.  The  program 
of  Americanization  must  include  forgetful  and  indifferent  Americans  as  well  as  aliens. 
To  Americanize  the  alien  certain  conditions  are  necessary  to  insure  the  best  results. 
These  teachers  must  be  properly  trained,  adequately  paid,  and  should  have  a  clear 
vision  of  the  goal  to  be  reached.  The  organization  of  the  school  must  be  flexible 
as  to  time  and  location.  It  requires  likewise  the  co-operation  of  newspapers,  churches, 
boards  of  trade,  as  well  as  the  direct  and  special  agencies  of  education.  Aside  from 
the  conscious  education  of  the  foreigner  in  and  out  of  the  school  there  is  the  other 
program  for  the  citizen  group.  Every  real  program  of  Americanization  must  take  in 
the  whole  community  as  a  partner  with  the  school.  The  plan  prepared  here  looks 
to  the  organization  of  committees  which  will  undertake  to  look  after  the  industrial 
opportunities  in  the  community,  instruction  in  factories  for  aliens  and  citizens,  legis- 
lation, school  finance,  use  of  public  facilities  for  public  good,  public  community  activi- 
ties, and  publicity.  The  essential  thing  in  Americanization  is  the  creation  of  a  better 
community  life. — Albert  Shiels,  American  Education,  June,  1920.  R.  G.  H. 


678 


THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 


BIBLIOGRAPHY 


BOOKS 


Adolph,  Lucien.  Manuel  pratique  des 
Societes  en  nom  collectif  et  en  com- 
mandite simple.  Paris:  Rousseau  et 
Cie.    Pp.  267.    12  fr.  50. 

Alden,  Percy,  and  others.  Labor  and 
Industry.  New  York:  Longmans. 
Pp.  vdii+ZQS.     $5.00. 

Alston,  L.  How  It  All  Fits  Together. 
New  York:   Button.     Pp.  151. 

Andrews,  L.  C.  Manpower.  New  York: 
Button.     Pp.  xii+162.     $2.00. 

Askwith,  Lord.  Industrial  Problems  and 
Bisputes.    London:  Murray.    Pp.  494. 

215. 

Athearn,  W.,  comp.  The  Maiden  Survey. 
Religious  Survey  of  Maiden,  Mass. 
New  York:  Interchurch  Press.  Pp. 
213.     $2.50. 

Atkeson,  Mary  M.  The  Crossroads 
Meetin'  House.  New  York:  Inter- 
church Press.     Pp.39.     $0.35. 

Austin,  Mary.  26  Jane  Street.  New 
York:    Houghton.     Pp.    353.     $2.00. 

Babson,  R.  ReUgion  and  Business. 
NewYork:  Macmillan.  Pp.  221.  $2.75. 

Baring-Gould,  S.  The  Evangelical  Re- 
vival. NewYork:  Button.  Pp.  xvt-|- 
360.    $6 .  00. 

Bamett,  A.  Foundations  of  Feminism: 
A  Critique.  New  York:  McBride. 
Pp.345.    $2.50. 

Barr,  M.  W.,  and  Maloney,  E.  F.  Types 
of  Mental  Befectives.  Philadelphia: 
P.  Blakiston's  Sons.     Pp.200.     S3. 00. 

Bartholomew,  Marshall,  and  Lawrence, 
Robert.  Music  for  Everybody.  New 
York:   Abingdon.     Pp.  120.     $1.00. 

Barton,  William  E.  Paternity  of  Abra- 
ham Lincoln.  Was  He  the  Son  of 
Thomas  Lincoln  ?  Essay  on  Chastity 
of  Nancy  Hanks.  New  York:  Boran. 
Pp.  xiv-l-414.     $4.00. 

Bass,  John  F.  The  Peace  Tangle.  New 
York:    Macmillan.     Pp.  345.     $3.50. 

Beck,  James  M.  The  Passing  of  the  New 
Freedom.  New  York:  Boran.  Pp. 
ix  4-169. 

Behnsen,  Henry,  and  Genzmer,  Werner. 
Baluta-Elend  und  Friedensvertrag. 
Zweite,  neubearbeitete  Auflage.  Leip- 
zig:   Felix  Meiner.     M.  5.50. 

Belton,  F.  G.  Present-Bay  Problems  in 
Christian  Morals.  Milwaukee,  Wis.: 
Morehouse   Pub.   Co.     Pp.   xvi-|-2o6. 


Beman,  L.  T.,  comp.  Selected  Articles 
on  the  Compulsorj'  Arbitration  and 
Compulsory  Investigation  of  Industrial 
Bisputes.  4th  ed.,  rev.  and  enl.  New 
York:  WUson.     Pp.  U4-303.    Si. 25. 

Benge,  E.  J.  Standard  Practice  in 
Personnel  Work.  New  York:  Wilson. 
Pp.  286.    S3. 00. 

Bettes,  Eugene.  Sortation  Theorj-  of 
Vaccination.  Baltimore :  Peoples  Print- 
ing Co.     Pp.  142. 

Bjerre,  P.  The  Historj'  and  Practice  of 
Psychoanalysis.  Translated  by  Eliza- 
beth N.  Barrow.  Rev.  ed.  Boston: 
Badger.     Pp.  349.     S4  00. 

Blakeslee,  G.  H.,  ed.  Mexico  and  the 
Caribbean.  Clark  University  Ad- 
dresses. New  York:  Stechert.  Pp. 
x+363. 

Bloomfield,  B.  Labor  Maintenance. 
NewYork:  Ronald.     Pp.520.     S5.00. 

Bousfield,  P.  The  Elements  of  Practical 
Psychoanalysis.  New  York:  Button. 
Pp.  276.     $5.00. 

Bricker,  G.  A.  The  Church  in  Rural 
America.  Cincinnati:  Standard.  Pp. 
193.    $1.00. 

Brown,  C.  F.,  ed.  The  Stonyhurst 
Pageants.  Baltimore:  Johns  Hopkins 
Press.     Pp.  302.    $3.30. 

Brown,  I.  J.  C.  The  Meaning  of 
Bemocracy.  Chicago:  McClurg.  Pp. 
xi-f-175.    $2.00. 

Brunhes,  J.  Human  Geography:  An 
Attempt  at  a  Positive  Classification. 
New  York:  Rand,  McNally.  Pp. 
xvi-t-648. 

Bumham,  A.  C.  The  Community  Health 
Problem.  NewYork:  Macmillan.  Pp. 
149. 

Bums,  C.  B.  Principles  of  Revolution. 
London:   Allen.    Pp.  155.    55. 

Calkins,  R.  The  Social  Message  of  the 
Book  of  Revelation.  New  York: 
Womans  Press.     Pp.  190.    $1.00. 

Cannons,  H.  G.  T.,  ed.  Bibliography  of 
Industrial  Efficiency  and  Factory 
Management.  New  York:  Button. 
Pp.  viii-}-i68.     $5.00. 

Carlton,  F.  T.  History  and  Problems 
of  Organized  Labor.  Revised.  New 
York:  Heath.     Pp.  xi-l-559. 

Casson,  H.  N.  Labor  Troubles,  and 
How  to  Prevent  Them.  London: 
Efficiency  Magazine.     Pp.  208. 


RECENT  LITEILiTURE 


679 


Chaffee,  Zechariah.  Freedom  of  Speech. 
New    York:      Harcourt.      Pp.    vii-f- 

431- 

Chancellor,  E.  B.  The  Eighteenth 
Centur\'  in  London.  Account  of  Its 
Social  Life  and  Arts.  New  York: 
Scribner.     Pp,  271.    $12.00. 

Chapin,  F.  S.  Field  Work  and  Social 
Research.  New  York:  Century.  Pp. 
224.     Si.  75- 

Church,  W.  S.,  and  others.  Influence  of 
Heredity  on  Disease,  with  Special 
Reference  to  Tuberculosis,  Cancer  and 
Diseases  of  the  Nervous  System.  New 
York:    Longmans.     Pp.   142. 

Cleveland  Foundation.  Commercial  Rec- 
reation. Cleveland  Recreation  Sur- 
vey. Cleveland:  The  Foundation. 
Pp.  ISO.     $0.25. 

.    Commimity  Recreation  Program. 

Cleveland:  The  Fovmdation.  Pp.  iii. 
$0.25. 

.      Delinquency    and    Spare    Time. 

Cleveland:  The  Foimdation.  Pp.  184. 
$0.25. 

.     Public  Provision  for  Recreation. 

Cleveland:  The  Foundation.  Pp.  193. 
$0.25. 

.     School  Work  and   Spare  Time. 

Cleveland:  The  Foundation.  Pp.  171. 
So. 25. 

.     The  Sphere  of  Private  Agencies. 

Cleveland:  The  Foimdation,  Pp.  173. 
$0.25. 

.     Wholesome   Citizens  and   Spare 

Time.  Cleveland:  The  Foundation. 
Pp.  177.     $0.25. 

ColHns,  M.  T.  Some  Modern  Concep- 
tions of  Natural  Law.  New  York: 
Longmans.     Pp.  v-l-104.     $1.00. 

Commons,  J.  R.,  and  Andrews,  J.  B. 
Principles  of  Labor  Legislation.  Rev. 
ed.  New  York:  Harper.  Pp.  559. 
$2.75. 

Compere-Merel.  Le  Socialisme  agraire. 
Paris:  Riviere.     Pp.  176.    9  fr. 

Conference  of  Social  Work.  Forty- 
seventh  Annual  Session.  New  Orleans, 
1920.  Chicago:  University  of  Chicago 
Press.     Pp.  v-f-521. 

Cooke,  G.  W.  Social  Revolution  of 
Religion.  Boston:  Stratford.  Pp. 
416.     $3.50. 

Coombs,  J.  W.  Making  of  Men.  Lon- 
don:   Seeley.    Pp.  354.     105.  6d. 

Coriat,  I.  H.  Repressed  Emotions.  New 
York:    Brentano.     Pp.  213.     S2.00. 

Crawford,  L.  W.  Vocations  within  the 
Church.  New  York:  Abingdon.  Pp. 
211.    $1.25. 


Cross,  A.  L.  A  Shorter  History  of 
England  and  Greater  Britain.  Rev. 
ed.  New  York:  Macmillan.  Pp. 
xxvi-t-942. 

Cruikshank,  A.  B.  Popular  Misgovern- 
ment  in  the  United  States.  New  York: 
Moffat.    Pp.  455.    $3.00. 

Cubberly,  E.  P.  History  of  Education. 
Educational  Practice  and  Progress 
Considered  as  Phase  of  Development 
of  Western  Civilization.  Boston: 
Houghton.     Pp.  xxi+849.     $3.75. 

.       Readings    in     the     History    of 

Education.     Boston:    Houghton.     Pp. 
xxi-l-648.     $3.75. 

Culpin,  M.  Spiritualism  and  the  New 
Psychology.  An  Explanation  of  Spiritu- 
alist Phenomena  and  Beliefs  in  Terms 
of  Modern  Knowledge.  New  York: 
Longmans.     Pp.  xvi-l-159.     $2.00. 

Cushman,  A.  S.  Chemistry  and  Civiliza- 
tion. Boston:  Badger.  Pp.  151. 
$2 .  50. 

Daniels,  J.  America  via  the  Neighbor- 
hood. New  York:  Harper.  Pp.  462. 
$2.00. 

Dasent,  A.  I.  Piccadilly  in  Three 
Centuries.  With  Some  Account  of 
Berkeley  Square  and  the  Haymarket. 
New  York:  Macmillan.  Pp.  318. 
$7  00. 

Davis,  E.  E.  The  Twentieth  Century 
Rural  School.  Indianapolis:  Bobbs- 
Merrill.    Pp.  vi+242.    $1.75. 

Dealy,  J.  Q.  Sociology,  Development 
and  Application.  New  York:  Apple- 
ton.     Pp.  xv-f-547.     $3.00. 

Ditchfield,  P.  H.  Old  ViUage  Life. 
Glimpses  of  village  life  through  all  ages. 
New  York:  Dutton.  Pp.  xii+253. 
$2.50. 

Dole,  C.  F.  A  ReUgion  for  the  New 
Day.  New  York:  Huebsch.  Pp.  297. 
$2 .00. 

Dow,  G.  S.  Introduction  to  the  Princi- 
ples of  Sociology.  A  textbook  for 
colleges  and  universities.  Waco,  Tex.: 
Baylor  Univ.  Press.    Pp.  505.    $2.75. 

Drachsler,  J.  Democracy  and  Assimila- 
tion. The  blending  of  immigrant 
heritages  in  America.  New  York: 
Macmillan.     Pp.  xii-F2  75.     S3. 00. 

Drake,  D.  Shall  We  Stand  by  the 
Church?  New  York:  Macmillan. 
Pp.  181.     $2.00. 

Dunn,  A.  W.,  and  Harris,  H.  M.  Citizen- 
ship in  School  and  Out.  New  York: 
Heath.     Pp.  144.     So.  80. 

Dunning,  Wm.  A.  History  of  Political 
Theories  from  Rousseau  to  Spencer. 


68o 


THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 


New  York:   Macmillan.    Pp.  ix+446. 
$4.00. 

Ellis,  Havelock.  The  New  Spirit.  New 
York:  Boni  &  Liveright.  Pp.  ix+292. 
So. 95. 

Feldman,  W.  M.  The  Principles  of  Ante- 
natal and  Post-natal  Child  Physiology. 
New  York:  Longmans.  Pp.  x.xvii-|- 
694.     Sio.5onet. 

Fenwick,  C.  G.  Political  Systems  in 
Transition.  Wartime  and  After.  New 
York:  Century.    Pp.  xi.x+322.    S3. 00. 

Femald,  M.  R.,  and  Hayes,  M.  H.  S. 
A  Study  of  Women  Delinquents  in 
New  York  State.  New  York :  Century. 
Pp.  xviii4-542. 

Fielding,  W.  J.  Sanity  in  Sex.  New 
York:   Dodd.    Pp.333-    Si-75- 

Fields,  G.  C.  Guild  SociaUsm:  A 
Critical  Examination.  London :  Gard- 
ner.    Pp.  158.     55. 

Filene,  Catherine.  Careers  for  Women. 
Boston:  Houghton.  Pp.  xv+576. 
$4 . 00. 

Finch,  'SI.  B.,  and  Peers,  E.  A.  Origms  of 
French  Romanticism.  New  York: 
Button.    Pp.  xv+303.    $6.00. 

Flewelling,  R.  T.  Bergson  and  Personal 
Realism.  New  York:  Abingdon.  Pp. 
304.     $2.00. 

Flynn,  J.  S.  The  Influence  of  Puritanism 
on  the  Political  and  Religious  Thought 
of  the  English.  New  York:  Button. 
Pp.  viii+257.     $4.00. 

Fosdick,  R.  B.  American  Police  Systems. 
New  York:    Century.    Pp.  x-l-408. 

Frachtenberg,  Leo  J.  Alsea  Texts  and 
Myths.  Bulletin  of  Bureau  of  Ameri- 
can Ethnology.  Washington:  Govt. 
Ptg.  Office.     Pp.  304. 

Freud,  S.  Selected  Papers  on  Hysteria 
and  Other  Neuroses.  Third  enlarged 
edition,  authorized  translation  by  Brill. 
New  York:  Nervous  and  Mental 
Bisease  Publishing  Co.     Pp.  v-l-225. 

Galeot,  A.-L.  Prdcis  de  I'organisation 
theorique  et  pratique.  Paris:  Nou- 
velle  Libraire  Nationale.  Pp.  208. 
7fr. 

Galin,  L.  Justice  et  Syst^me  penal  de 
la  Russie  revolutionnaire  de  I'origine 
au  debut  de  1920.  Paris:  Rousseau 
et  Cie.     Pp.  117.     6  fr.  50. 

Galland,  W.  H.  Diseases  of  Infancy  and 
Childhood.  Chicago:  Brake.  Pp.  348. 
$1 . 50. 

.       Maternity     and     Child     Care. 

Chicago:    Brake.    Pp.  286.    Si.  50. 

.  Proper  Feeding  of  Infants.  Chi- 
cago:   Brake.     Pp.  296.    $1.50. 


Gibson,  W.  Coal  in  Great  Britain. 
Composition,  Structure  and  Resources 
of  the  Coalfields,Visible  and  Concealed. 
New  York:  Longmans.    Pp.  \-iii-^-3ii. 

S7-50- 
Gide,  Ch.    Les  Institutions  de  progres 

social.    Paris:    Libr.  de  la  Societe  du 

Recueil  Sirey.     Pp.  612.     12  fr. 
Ginsburg,   C.   B.     The   Kabbalah:     Its 

Boctrines,   Bevelopment,  and  Litera- 
ture.    New  York:    Bloch.     Pp.    150. 

$2.25. 
Girl     Scouts.       Campward     Ho.       189 

Le.xington    Ave.,     New    York:     The 

Scouts.    Pp.  192.    $1.25. 
GlaspeU,  Susan.    Plays.    Boston:  Small, 

Maynard.     Pp.  315. 
Goodrich,     Carter  L.     The  Frontier  of 

Control.    A  Study  of  British  Workshop 

PoUtics.     New  York:    Harcourt.     Pp. 

xvi+277. 
Griscom,  E.,  Jr.  Americanization.   School 

reader     and     speaker.       New     York: 

Macmillan.     Pp.  255.     Si. 00. 
Guilford,    E.    L.      Nottingham.      New 

York:       Macmillan.        Pp.      \'i-|-i2i. 

$1.60. 
Hall,  Arnold  B.    Bynamic  Americanism. 

Indianapolis:  Bobbs-Merrill.    Pp.  335. 
Hall,  G.  Stanley.    Morale:  The  Supreme 

Standard  of  Life  and  Conduct.     New 

York:  Appleton.    Pp.  ix -1-378.    S3. 00. 
.      Recreations    of   a   Psychologist. 

New  York:  Appleton.  Pp.336.  S2.50. 
Harris,  J.  H.    Africa,  Slave  or  Free.    New 

York:   Button.    Pp.  xxi+261.    S3. 00. 
Hart,  J.  K.     Community  Organization. 

New    York:     Macmillan.      Pp.    230. 

S2.50. 
Haskell,    Oreola   W.      Banner   Bearers. 

Tales  of  Suffrage  Campaigns.    Geneva, 

N.Y.:    W.   F.   Humphrey.     Pp.   350. 

Si. 50. 
Henry,  R.  M.    The  Evolution  of  Sinn 

Fein.    New  York:  Huebsch.    Pp.  318. 

$2 . 00. 

Hericourt,  J.  The  Social  Biseases, 
Tuberculosis,  Syphilis,  .Alcoholism,  Ste- 
rility. Translated  by  B.  Miall.  New 
York:    Button.     Pp.  x-l-246.     S2.50. 

Hicks,  F.  C.  The  New  Worid  Order. 
New  York:  Boubleday.    Pp.  viii-l-496. 

Hingham,  C.  F.  Looking  Forward. 
Mass  Education  Through  Publicity. 
New  York:   Knopf.     Pp.  201.    S2.00. 

Hirsch,  Max.  An  Analysis  of  the 
Proposals  and  Conceptions  of  Socialism. 
Three  addresses.  New  York:  Huebsch. 
Pp.  59.     $0.50. 


RECENT  LITERATURE 


68i 


Hobson,  J.  A.  Morals  of  Economic 
Internationalism.  Boston:  Houghton. 
Pp.  62.     $1 .00. 

Hollingsworth,  Harry  L.  The  Psy- 
chology of  Functional  Neuroses.  New 
York:  Appleton.  Pp.  .xiii4-259. 
S2.00. 

Hoschiller,  Max.  Le  Mirage  du  soviet- 
isme.  Paris:  Payot  et  Cie.  Pp.  256. 
7  fr.  50. 

Himtington,  E.,  and  Gushing,  S.  W. 
Principles  of  Human  Geography.  New 
York:    Wiley.     Pp.  xiv4-430.     $2.50. 

Husslein,  J.  C.  Evolution  and  Social 
Progress.  New  York:  Kennedy.  Pp. 
viii+287.     $1.75. 

James,  William.  Gollected  Essays  and 
Reviews.  New  York:  Longmans. 
Pp.  X+S16.     $3.75- 

Janet,  Pierre  M.  F.  Major  Systems  of 
Hysteria.  2d  ed.  with  new  material. 
New    York:     Macmillan.      Pp.    345. 

$2.75- 

Johnson,  G.  F.,  and  others.  Management 
and  the  Worker.  Chicago:  Shaw. 
Pp.  228.     $3.00. 

Jones,  William.  Ojibwa  Texts.  Publi- 
cation of  American  Ethnological  So- 
ciety.   New  York:  Stechert.    $8.00. 

Kansas  Public  Utilities  Commission. 
Kansas  Public  Utilities  and  Railroad 
Law  Relative  to  the  Public  Utilities 
Commission.  Topeka:  The  Com- 
mission.   Pp.  241. 

Kautsky,  Karl.  Comment  s'est  d^clen- 
chee  la  guerre  mondiale.  Paris: 
Costes.     10  fr. 

Kautz,  Johnl.  Trucking  to  the  Trenches. 
New  York:  Houghton.  Pp.  vii-t-173. 
$1 .00. 

Keith,  J.  A.  H.,  and  Bagley,  W.  C. 
The  Nation  and  the  Schools.  A  study 
in  the  application  of  the  principle  of 
federal  aid  to  education  in  the  United 
States.  New  York:  Macmillan.  Pp. 
xvii-l-364.    $2.25. 

Kempf,  E.  J.  Psychopathology.  St. 
Louis:   C.  V.  Mosby.    Pp.  xxiii-l-762. 

Kirkaldy,  A.  W.  Industry  and  Finance. 
The  results  of  inquiries  arranged  by  the 
section  of  economic  science  and 
statistics  of  the  British  Association, 
1918,  1919.  New  York:  Pitman.  Pp. 
viii-l-150.    $2.10. 

.      Wealth.      Its    Production    and 

Distribution.  New  York:  Button. 
Pp.  147.    $2.25. 

Kraepelin,  Emil.  Manic-Depressive  In- 
sanity and  Paranoia.  Translated 
by    Mary   Barclay.      Chicago:     Chi- 


cago Medical  Book  Co.  Pp.  280. 
$6 . 00. 

Kroeber  A.  L.,  and  Waterman,  T.  T. 
Source  Book  in  Anthropology.  Ber- 
keley, Gal.:  University  of  California 
Press.     Pp.  565. 

Lachapelle,  G.  La  Society  des  nations. 
Paris:   Toustan.     2  fr.  50. 

La  Motte,  E.  N.  Opium  Monopoly. 
New  York:   Macmillan. 

Lane-Claypon,  J.  E.  Child  Welfare 
Movement.    London:   Bell.    Pp.  341. 

IS. 

Lansbury,  G.     What  I  Saw  in  Russia. 

New  York:    Boni  &  Liveright.     Pp. 

xvii-fi72.     $1.50. 
Lapage,    C.    P.      Feeblemindedness    in 

Children  of  School  Age.    2d  ed.    New 

York:      Longmans.       Pp.     xv-l-309. 

$4  .  GO. 

Lawrence,  D.  H.  Women  in  Love.  New 
York:    Seltzer.    Pp.  536.    $15.00. 

Lawson,  F.  M.  Industrial  Control. 
New  York:  Pitman.    Pp.130.    d,s.6d. 

Lehrfeld,  Louis.  Short  Talks  on  Personal 
and  Community  Health.  Philadelphia: 
F.A.Davis.    Pp.271.    $2.00. 

Loeb,  Sophie  I.  Everyman's  Child. 
New  York:  The  Century  Co.  Pp. 
286. 

Loose,  Harry  J.  The  Shamus.  A  real 
detective's  story.  Boston:  Christo- 
pher.   Pp.  296.    $2.00. 

Loria,  Achille.  Karl  Marx.  Authorized 
translation  from  the  Italian.  New 
York:   Seltzer.    Pp.  161.    $1.50. 

Lubschez,  B.  J.  Story  of  the  Motion 
Picture.  727  7th  Ave.,  New  York: 
Reeland  Pub.  Co.    $1.00. 

Lynd,  Robert.  Passion  of  Labour. 
London:   Bell.    Pp.  206.    6s. 

MacDonald,  J.  R.  Policy  for  the 
Labour  Party.  London:  Parsons. 
Pp.  188.    45.  bd. 

Marriott,  C.  Modem  Movements  in 
Painting.  New  York:  Scribner.  Pp. 
xii-l-268.    $7.50. 

Martin,  E.  D.  Behavior  of  Crowds.  A 
Psychological  Study.  New  York: 
Harper.    Pp.  311.    $2.00. 

Marx,  Magdeline.  Woman.  New  York: 
Seltzer.    Pp.  viii-l-228. 

Mason,  William  A.  A  History  of  the 
Art  of  Writing.  New  York:  Mac- 
millan.    Pp.  502.    $6.50. 

Masterman,  J.  H.  B.  Birmingham. 
New  York:  Macmillan.  Pp.  106. 
$1.60. 

Mathews,  Basil,  ed.  Essays  on  Voca- 
tion. NewYork:  Oxford  Press.  Pp.128. 


682 


THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 


McKim,  W.  M.  A  Study  for  the  Times. 
An  inquiry  into  thought  and  motive. 
New  York:    Putnam.     Pp.  vii+324. 

$2. 50. 

Mendelssohn,  Sidney.  The  Jews  of 
Africa.  Especially  in  the  sixteenth  and 
seventeenth  centuries.  New  York: 
Button.    Pp.  xiii+199.    $4.00. 

Merriam,  C.  E.  American  Political 
Ideals.  Development  of  American 
political  thought,  1865-1917.  New 
York:    Macmillan.     Pp.  475.     $2.75. 

Miller,  D.  H.  International  Relations 
of  Labor.  Lectures  before  summer 
school  of  theology  at  Harvard  Uni- 
versity, June  1920.  New  York: 
Knopf.    Pp.  77.    $1.50. 

Mordell,  Albert.  The  Erotic  Motive  in 
Literature.  New  York:  Boni  & 
Liveright.    Pp.  v+250.    $1.75. 

Morel,  E.  D.  The  Black  Man's  Burden. 
New  York:  Huebsch.  Pp.  x+241. 
$1.50. 

Moulton,  H.  G.  Financial  Organization 
of  Society.  Chicago:  University  of 
Chicago  Press.    Pp.  xxiii-l-789.    $4.00. 

Munson,  F.  M.  Hygiene  of  Commimi- 
cable  Diseases.  Handbook  for  sani- 
tarians, medical  officers  of  the  army 
and  navy,  and  general  practitioners. 
New  York:  Hoeber.  Pp.  xiv-l-793. 
$5-50. 

Murphy,  John  J.,  and  others.  The 
Housing  Famine.  How  to  End  It. 
New  York:  Dutton.  Pp.  xvi-f-246. 
$2.50. 

Myerson,  Abraham.  Nervous  House- 
wife. Boston:  Little.  Pp.  273. 
$2.25. 

Nearing,  Scott.  The  American  Empire. 
New  York:  Rand  School  of  Social 
Science.    Pp.  266.    $0.50. 

New  York  Probation  Committee.  Thir- 
teenthAnnualReportfori9i9.  Albany: 
State  Library.    Pp.  560. 

New  York  State  Industrial  Commission. 
Industrial  Code,  1920.  Albany:  The 
Commission.    Pp.  245. 

O'Hare,  Kate  Richards.  In  Prison. 
Box  1033,  St.  Louis,  Mo.:  Frank 
P.  O'Hare.    Pp.  59.    $0.25. 

Okakura,  K.  Ideals  of  the  East  with 
Special  Reference  to  the  Art  of  Japan. 
New  York:  Dutton.    Pp.227.    $300. 

Page,  Thomas  N.  Italy  and  the  World 
War.  New  York:  Scribner.  Pp. 
xii-f422.    $5.00. 

Park,  Joseph  H.  The  English  Reform 
Bill  of  1867.  New  York:  Longmans. 
Columbia  University  Studies.    Pp.  285. 


Patten,  William.  The  Grand  Strategy 
of  Evolution.  The  social  philosophy 
of  a  biologist.  Boston:  Badger.  Pp. 
x\dii-(-43o.    S5.00. 

Payne,  Fanny  U.  Plays  and  Pageants 
of  Citizenship.  New  York:  Harper. 
Pp.  222.    $1.50. 

Peck,  W.  G.  From  Chaos  to  Catholicism. 
New  York:  Macmillan.  Pp.  251. 
$3.00. 

Perry,  R.  B.  Aimotated  Bibliography 
of  the  Writings  of  William  James. 
New  York:  Longmans.  Pp.  69. 
$2.25. 

Phelan,  J.  Readings  in  Rural  Sociology. 
New  York:  Macmillan.  Pp.  xiv-}-632. 
$4.00. 

Phelps-Stokes  Fund.  Negro  Migration. 
Changes  in  rural  organization  and 
population  of  the  cotton  belt.  New 
York:   W.  D.  Gray.    Pp.  195. 

Press  Debates  Association.  Debate 
between  Samuel  Gompers  and  Hetuy 
J.  Allen.  Carnegie  Hall,  New  York, 
May  28,  1920.  New  York:  Dutton. 
Pp.  v-(-io5. 

Price,  C.  W.,  and  others.  Working 
Conditions,  Wages  and  Progress.  Chi- 
cago:   Shaw.     Pp.  254.     $3.00. 

Prince,  Morton.  The  Dissociation  of  a 
Personality.  A  biographical  study  in 
abnormal  psychology.  New  York: 
Longmans.    Pp.  x-}-575.    $4.00. 

Prince,  S.  H.  Catastrophe  and  Social 
Change.  Based  on  a  sociological 
study  of  the  Halifax  disaster.  New 
York:    Longmans.     Pp.   151.     $2.25. 

Queen,  S.  A.  Passing  of  the  County 
Jail.  Menasha,  Wis.:  Banta.  Pp. 
158.     $1.50. 

Rapeer,  L.  W.  Consolidated  Rural 
School.  New  York:  Scribner.  Pp. 
545-     $3  00. 

Re-Bartlett,  Lucy.  Le  Regne  4  venir. 
Paris:    Fischbacher.     Pp.   136.     5  fr. 

Reid,  G.  A.  Prevention  of  Venereal 
Disease.  London:  Heinemann.  Pp. 
447-     15^- 

Rhodes,  H.  G.  American  Towns  and 
People.  New  York:  McBride.  Pp. 
274.     $3.50. 

Ripley,  G.  S.  Games  for  Boys.  New 
York:     Holt.      Pp.    xv-l-256.    $1.60, 

Rivers,  W.  H.  R.  Instinct  and  the 
Unconscious.  New  York:  Macmillan. 
Pp.  viii-{-252. 

Robbins,  H.  The  Making  of  To-morrow: 
The  Art  of  Industrial  Right  Liv- 
ing. New  York:  Dutton.  Pp.  176. 
$2 .00. 


RECENT  LITERATURE 


683 


Roberts,  Peter.  Problem  of  Americaniza- 
tion. New  York:  Macmillan.  Pp. 
ix+246.    Si. 60. 

Robie,  Walter  F.  Sex  and  Life.  2d 
ed.   Boston:  Badger.    Pp.424.    $7.50. 

Rowe,  L.  S.  Early  Effects  of  the  War 
upon  the  Finance,  Commerce,  and 
Industry  of  Peru.  Carnegie  Endow- 
ment for  International  Peace.  New 
York:  O.xford  University  Press.  Pp. 
v4-6o. 

Russell,  Bertrand.  Bolshevism:  Practice 
and  Theory.  New  York:  Harcourt. 
Pp.  192.    $2.00. 

Russell  Sage  Foundation.  The  Spring- 
field SurveJ^  Social  Conditions  in  an 
American  City.  Vol.  III.  New  York: 
The  Foundation.    Pp.  xii+439. 

Ryan,  John.  Social  Reconstruction. 
New  York:  Macmillan.  Pp.  242. 
$2 .  50. 

Ryan,  John  A.,  and  Husslein,  Jos.  The 
Church  and  Labor.  New  York: 
Macmillan.    Pp.  xvii4-303.    $3.75. 

Saunders,  K.  J.  Gotama  Buddha. 
Biography  Based  on  the  Canonical 
Books  of  the  Theravadin.  New  York: 
Association  Press.  Pp.  xii-f-ii3. 
$1.50. 

Schneiderman,  H.,  ed.  The  American 
Jewish  Year  Book.  Sept.  13,  1920,  to 
Oct.  2,  1 92 1.  Philadelphia:  Jewish 
Pub.  Society  of  America.  Pp.  X+S04. 
$2.00. . 

Schofield,  A.  S.  The  Mind  of  a  Woman. 
New  York:  Button.    Pp.120.    $1.50. 

Sears,  J.  B.,  and  others.  The  Boise 
Survey.  A  concrete  study  of  the 
administration  of  a  city  school  system. 
Yonkers,  N.Y.:  World  Book  Co. 
Pp.  viii-i-290.    $2.25. 

Secrist,  H.  Readings  and  Problems  in 
Statistical  Methods.  New  York: 
Macmillan.     Pp.  427.     $2.25. 

Shackleton,  R.  The  Book  of  Chicago. 
Philadelphia:   Penn.    Pp.  354-    S3. 50. 

Sheffield,  A.  E.  Social  Case  History. 
New  York:  Russell  Sage  Foundation. 
Pp.  227.     Si  .00. 

Slatter>',  Margaret.  Highway  to  Leader- 
ship. New  York:  Macmillan.  Pp.  143. 
$1  50. 

Smith,  C.  R.  The  Bible  Doctrine  of 
Society  in  Its  Historical  Evolution. 
New  York:  Scribner.  Pp.  xviii-l-400. 
$4.50. 

Smith,  William  H.  Children  by  Chance 
or  by  Choice.  And  Some  Correlated 
Considerations.  Boston:  Badger.  Pp. 
361.    $4.00. 


Snedden,     D.      Vocational    Education. 

New  York:   Macmillan.    Pp.  ix-t-587. 
Steiner,  Rudolf.    Le  Triple  aspect  de  la 

question  sociale.     Paris:    Fischbacher. 

Pp.  136.     5  fr. 
Taft,  William  H.     Taft  Papers  on  the 

League     of     Nations.       New     York: 

Macmillan.     Pp.  xx+340.     $4.50. 
Tawney,  R.  H.    The  Acquisitive  Society. 

New  York:    Harcourt.     Pp.  188. 
Tayler,    Reginald.      Socialist    Illusion, 

Being  a  Critical  Review  of  the  Prin- 
ciples  of   State    Socialism.     London: 

Allen.    Pp.  137.    3.y.  6d. 
Thomas,  Edward.     Industry,  Emotion, 

and   Unrest.     New  York:    Harcourt. 

Pp.  iv+25s. 
Thomas,     G.       The     Development     of 

Institutions  under  Irrigation.    Special 

reference    to   early   Utah    conditions. 

New    York:     Macmillan.      Pp.    293. 

$2.75. 
Thomas,  J.   H.     When  Labour  Rules. 

London:  Collins.    Pp.  204.    10s. 
Thompson,    C.    B.      Mental    Disorders 

Briefly  Described  and  Classified.    10  E. 

Centre    St.,    Baltimore:    Warwick   & 

York.    Pp.  48.    $0.75. 
Torelle,  Ellen.    The  Political  Philosophy 

of  Robert  M.  La  Follette.    Madison, 

Wis.:   The  Robert  M.  LaFollette  Co. 

Pp.  426. 
Tracy,  F.     Psychology  of  Adolescence. 

New  York:    Macmillan.    Pp.  x+246. 

$3 .  00. 
Varney,  J.     Sketches  of  Soviet  Russia. 

Whole  Cloth  and  Patches.    New  York: 

Brown.     Pp.  288.    $2.25. 
Vinogradoff,  Paul.    Outlines  of  Historical 

Jurisprudence.    Vol.  I.    Introduction. 

Tribal    Law.      New    York:     Oxford 

Press.    Pp.  ix-l-427. 
Vorse,   M.  H.     Men  and  Steel.     New 

York:    Boni   &   Liveright.     Pp.    185. 

$1 .00. 
Walsh,  James  J.     Religion  and  Health. 

Boston:  Little.    Pp.341.    $2.25. 
Warne,   F.   J.     The  Workers  at  War. 

New  York:    Century.     Pp.  250. 
Wasserman,   J.     The  World's  Illusion. 

Authorized    Translation    by    Ludwig 

Lewisohn.      New    York:     Harcourt. 

Pp.  405.    $4.00. 
Webb,  J.  P.     American  Prison  System. 

Salem,  Ore.:  State  Penitentiary  Print- 

ery.     Pp.  262. 
Webb,  S.,  and  Webb,  B.  P.    Industrial 

Democracy.     Edition  of  1920.     New 

York:     Longmans.      Pp.    xxxix-l-899. 

$7-50. 


684 


THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 


Wells,  H.  G.  The  Outline  of  History. 
New  York:  Macmillan.  2  vols. 
Pp.  .\ix+648;    x+676.     $10.50. 

Westlake,  H.  F.  Parish  Guilds  of 
Medieval  England.  New  York:  Mac- 
millan.   Pp.  242.    $4.80. 

.Withington,  R.  English  Pageantr>'.  A 
historical  outline.  Cambridge,  Mass.: 
Harvard  Univ.  Press.    Pp.441.    $6.00. 

Wood,  George  A.  William  Shirley, 
Governor  of  Massachusetts,  1 741-1756. 
New  York:    Longmans.     Pp.  433. 


Woofter,  T.  J.,  Jr.  Negro  Migration. 
New  York:  Gray.  Pp.  195.  $2.25. 
Paper,  Si. 50. 

Wright,  T.  G.  Literary  Culture  in  Early 
New  England,  1620-1730  (ed.  by  his 
wife).  New  Haven:  Yale  Press. 
Pp.  322.     S6.00. 

Young,  P.  N.  F.,  and  Ferrers,  Agnes. 
India  in  Conflict.  London:  Society 
for  the  Promotion  of  Christian  Knowl- 
edge.   Pp.  153.    35.  6d. 


PAMPHLETS 


American  Civil  Liberties  Union.  Since 
the  Buford  Sailed.  New  York:  The 
Union.     Pp.  14.     $0.05. 

American  Jewish  Commission.  Public 
Statement.  New  York:  The  Com- 
mission.    Pp.  4. 

American  Social  Hygiene  Association. 
A  History  and  a  Forecast.  New  York : 
The  Association.     Pp.  16. 

Anderson,  B.  M.,  Jr.  The  Fallacy  of 
"The  Stabilized  Dollar."  New  York: 
Chase  National  Bank.     Pp.   16. 

Babson,  Roger  W.  Fundamentals  of 
Prosperity.  What  They  Are  and 
Whence  They  Come.  New  York: 
Revell.     Pp.  95. 

Blachly,  C.  D.  Treatment  of  the 
Problem  of  Capital  and  Labor  in 
Social-Study  Courses  in  the  Churches. 
Chicago:  University  of  Chicago  Press. 
Pp.  81. 

Brissenden,  P.  F.,  and  Frankel,  Emil. 
Mobility  of  Industrial  Labor.  New 
York:  Columbia  University  Academy 
of  Political  Science.     Pp.  34. 

British  Ministry  of  Labour.  Report  of 
the  Committee  of  Enquiry  into  the 
Work  of  the  Employment  Exchanges. 
London:  H.  M.  Stationery  Ofl&ce. 
Pp.  32.     4^. 

Cause  of  the  World  Unrest.  London: 
Richards.     Pp.  269.     105.  td. 

City  Club  of  New  York.  The  Housing 
Crisis.  Memorandum  prepared  for  the 
special  session  of  the  New  York 
Legislature.  New  York:  The  Club. 
Pp.  13. 

Clark,  Willis  W.  Success  Record  of 
Delinquent  Boys  in  Relation  to 
Intelligence.  Whittier  State  School, 
Whittier,  Cal.:  The  Journal  of  Delin- 
quency.    Pp.  9. 

Cleveland  Hospital  Council.  Popular 
Summar>'of  the  Cleveland  Hospital  and 


Summary  of  the  Cleveland  Hospital 
and  Health  Survey.  Cleveland:  The 
Covmcil.     Pp.  26. 

DeVilbiss,  L.  A.  Child  Welfare  in 
Syracuse.  Syracuse,  N.  Y. :  Child 
Welfare  Committee.     Pp.  90.     $0.25. 

Douglas,  D.  W.  American  Minimimi 
Wage  Laws  at  Work.  New  York: 
National  Consumers'  League.  Pp.  41. 
$0. 10. 

Eliot,  C.  W.  Friendship  between  the 
United  States  and  Japan.  Portland, 
Ore. :  Japanese  Merchants'  Assoc.   Pp. 

Emmott,  Lord.  Nationalization  of  In- 
dustries. London:  Unwin.  Pp.  76. 
2^. 

Espinoza,  Roberto.  Sobre  Algunas  In- 
vestigaciones  de  Don  Alejandro  E. 
Bunge.  Respecto  al  alza  del  costo  de 
la  vida  en  la  Arjentina  i  sus  causas. 
Santiago  De  Chile:  Soc.  Imp.  i  Lit. 
"Universo"  Agustinas,  1250.     Pp.  62. 

Federated  Jewish  Charities  of  Boston. 
The  Trend  of  Jewish  Population  in 
Boston.  Boston:  The  Je\vish  Chari- 
ties.    Pp.  28. 

Fosdick,  R.  B.  Crime  in  America  and 
the    Police.     New    York:      Centurj\ 

Pp.  54. 

Fuller,  Elizabeth.  The  Mexican  Hous- 
ing Problems  in  Los  Angeles.  Los 
Angeles:  University  of  Southern  Cali- 
fornia.    Pp.  II. 

Gilbreth,  F.  B.,  and  Gilbrcth,  L.  M. 
Time  Study  and  Motion  Studj'  as 
Fundamental  Factors  in  Planning 
and  Control.  An  indictment  of  stop- 
watch time  study.  68  Eagle  Rock 
Way,  Montclair,'  N.J.:  Frank  B. 
Gilbreth.     Pp.  15. 

Gulick,  S.  L.  How  Shall  Immigration 
Be  Regulated  ?    New  York :  National 


RECENT  LITERATURE 


68s 


Committee  for  Constructive  Immi- 
gration Legislation.     Pp.  i6. 

Hmes,  L.  N.  The  School  as  the  Center 
of  Community  Life.  The  story  of  the 
work  of  the  Summitville  school, 
Simimitville,  Indiana.  Indianapolis: 
L.  N.  Hines,  State  Supt.  of  Public 
Instruction.     Pp.  28. 

Hirsch,  Max.  Analysis  of  the  Proposals 
and  Conceptions  of  Socialism.  New 
York:    Huebsch.     Pp.  59.     So. 50. 

Hoffman,  P.  M.,  Coroner  of  Cook 
County,  Illinois.  The  Race  Riots. 
Biennial  Report,  1918-1Q19,  and 
Official  Record  of  Inquests  on  the 
Victims  of  the  Race  Riots  of  July 
and  .August,  1919.  Chicago:  The 
Coroner.     Pp.  126. 

Holmes,  J.  H.  Two  Years  after  the 
War.  New  York:  Communitv  Church. 
Pp.  28.     $0.10. 

Holvoke  National  Bank,  Holyoke,  Mass. 
The  "Holyoke  National  Way"  of 
Sol\Tng  the  Housing  Problem.  Hol- 
yoke: The  Bank.     Pp.  29. 

Horack,  F.  E.  Child  Legislation  in 
Iowa.  Iowa  City:  University  of 
Iowa.     Pp.  36. 

House  of  Kuppenheimer.  Facts  versus 
Fables  about  the  Present  Cost  of  Good 
Clothing.     Chicago:  The  House.     Pp. 

37. 

Howe,  F.  C.  Why  Workers  and  Farmers 
Should  Organize  Banks  of  Their  Own 
and  How  They  Can  Manage  Them. 
Washington:  American  Farmer-Labor 
Co-operative  Committee.     Pp.  9. 

Hylan,  J.  F.  Stumbling  Blocks  Which 
Appear  to  Stand  in  the  Way  of  an 
Effective  Administration  of  the  Penal 
Law  in  New  York  City.  New  York: 
Police  Department.     Pp.  7. 

Inge,  William  R.  The  Idea  of  Progress. 
Romanes  Lecture,  May  27,  1920. 
New  York:  O.xford  Press.  Pp.  34. 
So.  90. 

Invin,  Will.  Conquering  an  Old  Enemy. 
New  York:  American  Hygiene  Associa- 
tion.    Pp.  13. 

Johnson,  J.  W.  Self-determining  Haiti. 
New  York:  The  Nation.  Pp.  48. 
«o.2S. 

Jusserand,  J.  J.  The  Economic  Situation 
in  France.  An  address  by  the  French 
Ambassador  before  the  Academy  of 
Political  Science,  New  York,  Dec.  9, 
1920.  2  Rector  St.,  New  York: 
Jean  De  Sieyes.     Pp.  5. 

Kansas  Agricultural  College.  Agricul- 
tural Experimental  Station.    Co-opera- 


tion Applied  to  Marketing  by  Kansas 
Farmers.  Manhattan:  The  College. 
Pp.  61. 

Karnell,  Minnie  K.  L.  The  American 
Home.  A  Pageant.  Philadelphia: 
Westminster   Press.     Pp.    t6.     $0.20. 

Levermore,  C.  H.  Comparison  of  the 
Responsibility  of  Governors  to  the 
Governed  under  Russian  Sovietism 
and  American  Democracy.  70  sth 
Ave.,  New  York:  New  York  Peace 
Society.     Pp.  2. 

Lloyd,  Ernest  F.  The  Closed  Union 
Shop  versus  the  Open  Union  Shop: 
Their  Social  and  Economic  Value 
Compared.  Boston:  The  National 
Industrial  Conference  Board.  Pp.  vi 
+  27. 

Macara,  C.  W.  Industrial  Council: 
Procedure  in  Settlement  of  Labor 
Disputes.  London :  Financial  Review 
of  Reviews.     Pp.  16.  6d. 

Mangold,  G.  B.  Social  Reform  in 
Missouri,  1820-1920.  Columbia,  Mis- 
souri: State  Historical  Society.  Pp. 
22. 

McMurtie,  D.  C.  Essentials  of  a 
National  System  for  Rehabilitation  of 
Disabled  Service  Men  of  American 
Forces.  311  Fourth  Ave.,  New  York: 
The  Author.     Pp.  23. 

National  Federation  of  Settlements. 
Report  and  Forecast,  1920.  Boston: 
The  Federation.     Pp.  5. 

Nearing,  Scott.  New  Slavery,  or  the 
World  Made  Safe  for  Plutocracy. 
Chicago:  Socialist  Party.  Pp.  45. 
So. 10. 

.      One    Big    Union    of    Business. 

New  York:  Rand  Book  Store.  Pp.32. 
So. 10. 

Nelles,  Walter.  Seeing  Red.  Civil 
liberty  and  law  in  the  period  following 
the  war.  New  York:  American  Civil 
Liberties  Union.     Pp.  11. 

New  Jersey  Dept.  of  Health,  Bureau  of 
Child  Hygiene.  Bibliography  on  the 
Care  and  Feeding  of  Infants  and 
Children.  Trenton,  N.J. :  The  Bureau. 
Pp.  15. 

New  Jersey  Department  of  Public 
Instruction.  Teaching  of  Social 
Studies  Including  History.  Trenton: 
The  Department.     Pp.  141- 

Nineteen-Sixteen-Nineteen-Twenty :  The 
Lloyd  George  Coalition  in  War  and 
Peace.    London:    Gooding.     Pp.  183. 

15. 

North  Carolina  State  Commission  of 
Public    Welfare.     County    Homes    in 


686 


TEE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 


North  Carolina.  Raleigh,  N.C.:  The 
Commission.     Pp.  8. 

Oregon  Department  of  Education.  In- 
dustrial Club  Work  of  Oregon  Boys 
and  Girls.  Salem:  State  Library. 
Pp.  48. 

Pennsylvania  Department  of  Labor  and 
Industry.  Rulings  of  the  Industrial 
Board  Pertaining  to  Women  in  In- 
dustry'. Harrisburg:  State  Library. 
Pp.  130. 

Public  Ownership  in  Canada.  Ottawa: 
Citizens'  Research  Institute  of  Canada. 
Pp.  8. 

Rand  School  for  Social  Science.  Political 
Guide  for  the  Workers.  Chicago: 
Socialist  Party.     Pp.  183. 

Randall,  J.  H.  Can  We  Still  Believe  in 
Progress?  New  York:  Community 
Church.     Pp.23.     So.  19. 

Rockefeller  Foundation.  International 
Health  Board.  Hookworm  and  Mala- 
ria Research  in  Malaya,  Java,  and 
the  Fiji  Islands.  New  York:  The 
Foundation.     Pp.  191. 

Rohleder,  Grace  I.  Woman  on  the 
Bench.  Washington,  D.C.:  Fairview 
Pub.  Co.     Pp.  32.     $1.00. 

Root,  Elihu.  Address  on  the  Permanent 
Court  of  International  Justice.  New 
York:  Association  of  the  Bar  of  the 
City  of  New  York.     Pp.  15.     $0.25. 

Rorty,  M.  C.  Making  Statistics  Talk. 
New  York:  American  Telephone  and 
Telegraph  Co.     Pp.  8. 

Rushmore,  Elsie  M.  A  Bibliography  for 
Social  Workers  among  the  Foreign 
Residents  of  the  United  States.  New 
York:  Young  Women's  Christian 
Association.     Pp.  33. 

Russell  Sage  Foundation.  Juvenile  De- 
linquency: A  Bibliography.  New 
York:   The  Foundation.     Pp.  3. 

Salmon,  T.  W.  Some  New  Problems  for 
Psychiatric  Research  in  Delinquency. 
New  York:  The  National  Committee 
for  Mental  Hygiene.     Pp.  14. 

Sarker,  B.  K.  Hindu  Art.  Its  Human- 
ism and  Modernism.  An  Introductory 
Essay.  New  York:  Huebsch.  Pp.44. 
$0.75. 

Secretary  of  Labor.  Eighth  Annual 
Report.  For  the  fiscal  year  ended 
June  30,  1920.  Washington:  Govt. 
Ptg.  Office.     Pp.  266. 

South  Carolina  State  Board  of  Public 
Welfare.  Feeblemindedness  and  Its 
Care  in  South  Carolina.  Columbia, 
S.C:   The  Board.     Pp.  28. 


Southard,  E.  E.  The  Functions  of  a 
Psychopathic  Hospital.  New  York: 
The  National  Committee  for  Mental 
Hygiene.     Pp.  16. 

Spaulding,  Edith  R.  Three  Cases  of 
Larceny  in  Which  the  Antisocial 
Behavior  Appeared  to  Represent  an 
Effort  to  Compensate  for  Emotional 
Repression.  New  York:  National 
Committee  for  Mental  Hygiene.  Pp. 
21. 

St.  Louis  Chamber  of  Commerce. 
Development  Service.  St.  Louis:  The 
Chamber.     Pp.  27. 

Streit,  C.  K.  "Where  Iron  Is,  There  Is 
the  Fatherland!"  New  York:  Huebsch. 
Pp.52.     $0.50. 

Texas  Board  of  Health.  Bureau  for 
Sanitary  Engineering:  Program  for  a 
Town  Clean-Up  Campaign.  Austin: 
State  Library.     Pp.  4. 

.      Bureau    of    Venereal    Diseases. 

Out-ostriching  the  Ostrich.  Austin: 
State  Library.     Pp.  15. 

Union  of  South  Africa.  Comr.  of 
Mentally  Disordered  and  Defective 
Persons.  Cape  Town,  South  Africa: 
Cape  Times  Ltd.,  Government  Printers. 
Pp.  51.     45. 

U.S.  Bureau  of  Educational  Health 
Training  for  Teachers.  The  Role  of 
Normal  and  Training  Schools  in  the 
Advancement  of  Health  Education. 
Washington:    Govt.  Ptg.  Office.     Pp. 

IS- 

U.S.  Bureau  of  Efficiency.  Report  for 
Nov.  I,  1919,  to  Oct.  31,  1920.  Wash- 
ington: Govt.  Ptg.  Office.     Pp.  23. 

U.S.  Bureau  of  Mines.  Methods  for  the 
Judging  of  First-Aid  Contests.  Wash- 
ington:   Govt.  Ptg.  Office.    Pp.  3. 

U.S.  Children's  Bureau.  Summary  of 
Juvenile  Court  Legislation  in  the 
United  States.  Washington:  Govt. 
Ptg.  Office.     Pp.  no. 

U.S.  Library  of  Congress.  List  of 
Bibliographies  on  Social  Surveys. 
Washington:     The    Library.     Pp.    3. 

U.S.  Public  Health  Service.  Study  of 
the  Relation  of  Diet  to  Pellagra 
Incidence  in  Seven  Textile-mill  Com- 
munities of  South  Carolina  in  19 16. 
Washington:  Govt.  Ptg.  Office.  Pp.  69. 

.       Can     the     Mosquito     Convey 

Infection  from  a  Malaria  Patient 
Undergoing  Treatment  ?  Washington: 
Govt.  Ptg.  Office.     Pp.  7. 

.  Questions  and  Answers  on  Tuber- 
culosis, by  B.  K.  Hays.  Washington: 
Govt.  Ptg.  Office.     Pp.  10. 


RECENT  LITERATURE 


687 


Weaver,  E.  W.  Distribution  of  Labor 
Recruits.  347  Madison  Ave.,  New 
York:  United  Y.M.C.A.  Schools. 
Pp.  23.     $0.20. 

Wisconsin  Board  of  Health.  Wisconsin 
Rural  School.     Madison:   The  Board. 

Pp-    35- 
Woods,  Amy.     Social  Effects  of  Prohibi- 
tion as  Seen  in  Boston  and  Massachu- 


setts. Boston:  Anti-Saloon  League. 
Pp.  20. 

Workers'  Control  in  Italy.  New  York: 
Methodist  Federation  for  Social  Serv- 
ice.    Pp.  4. 

Wright,  Henry  C.  Survey  of  Cripples  in 
New  York  City.  New  York:  Com- 
mittee on  After  Care  of  Infantile 
Paralysis  Cases.    Pp.  104. 


ARTICLES 


Adler,  Herman  A.  The  Criminologist 
and  the  Courts.  Jour.  Crim.  Law  and 
Criminol.    11:419-25,   Nov.   '20. 

Andrews,  Norman  P.  The  Negro  in 
Politics.  Jour.  Negro  Hist.  5:420- 
36,  Oct.  '20. 

A  Pioneer  in  Industrial  Clubs.  House 
Beautiful  49:44-50.     Jan.  '21. 

Bauer,  Otto.  Dittatura  e  deraocrazia. 
Crit.  Soc.  30:343-47,  Nov.  '20. 

Belinson,  ]Mose.  II  motivo  sociale  del 
movimento  nazionale  ebraico.  Crit. 
Soc.  30:312-15,  Oct.  '20. 

Boas,  F.  The  Problem  of  the  American 
Negro.   Yale  Rev.  10:385-95,  Jan. '21. 

Bode,  B.  H.  Intelligence  and  Behavior. 
Jour.  Phil.  18:10-18,  Jan.  '21. 

Briggs,  T.  H.  Can  Character  Be  Taught 
and  Measured?  Sch.  and  Society 
22:596-601,  Dec.  '20. 

Bryson,  Lyman.  The  Child  Crisis  in 
Eastern  Europe.  Forum  65:25-30, 
Jan.  '21. 

Butler,  Nicholas  Murray,  Barrows,  David 
F.,  Lovejoy,  Arthur  O.,  Lowell,  A. 
Lawrence.  Is  Academic  Freedom  De- 
sirable? Ed.  Rev.  60:417-32,  Dec.  '20. 

Cantono,  Alessandro.  Le  organizzazioni 
professionali.  Riv.  inteml.  de  sci.  soc. 
28:3-11,  Sept.-Oct.  '20. 

Carmichael,  R.  D.  On  the  Character  of 
Primitive  Human  Progress.  Sci.  Mo. 
12:53-61.    Jan.  '21. 

Colborn  and  Mauren.  The  Socialized 
Recitation  from  the  Student's  Stand- 
point.    Educa.  41:171-75.     Nov.  '20. 

Colby,  Eldridge.  Training  a  Citizen 
Army.     Educa.  41: 152-58.     Nov. '20. 

Cordovani,  O.  M.  Fatti  e  documenti 
sociali.  Riv.  inteml.  de  sci.  soc. 
28:162-78,  Nov.  '20. 

Dermison,  S.  M.  A  Moorish  Woman's 
Life.  The  Moslem  World,  ,11:24-28 
Jan. '21. 

Doeblin,  M.  I.  Recreation  versus  De- 
linquency. Sch.  and  Society  22:478- 
87,  Nov.  '20. 


Dunlap,  Knight.    The  Social  Need  for 

Scientific      Psychology.       Sci.       Mo. 

11:502-17.     Dec.  '20. 
Galpin,  C.  J.     Some  National  Aspects  of 

Child-Welfare  in  Rural  Communities. 

Child Welf. Mag.    15:61-65.   Nov. '20. 
Giddings,  F.  H.    A  Theory  of  History. 

Pol.  Sci.  Quar.  35:493-521,  Dec.  '20. 
Hieronymous,  R.  E.     Great  Cities  and 

Social  Settlements.     Sch.   and   Home 

Ed.    40:59-60.     Nov.  '20. 
Hjort,    Johan.      Nogen      Tanker     om 

Arbeidersporsmaal.    Sociale  Med.    9: 

893-900, '20. 
Howerth,   J.   W.    The  Labor  Problem 

from  the  Social  Viewpoint.    Inteml. 

Jour.  Ethics  31:168-82,  Jan.  21. 
Imboden,  Sarah  Mark.    A  Cooperative 

Community  Study.     Elem.  Sch.  Jour. 

21:208-15,  Nov.  '20. 
Ingersoll,  R.  V.     New  York  Legislative 

Acts  on  Housing.     Nat.   Mun.   Rev. 

9:762-65,  Dec.  '20. 
Kaiser,  Irving   R.    The  Psychology  of 

the    Thrill.     Pedag.  Sem.    27:243-80, 

Oct.  '20. 
Lewis,    O.    F.    Early    Anticipation    of 

Prison  Reform.   Unpar.   Rev.   15:43- 

61,  Jan.-Mar.,  '21. 
Makinen,   KaUie,   and   Pupin,   Michael. 

Why  and  How  I  Became  an  American. 

World's  Work  41:270-76,  Jan.  '21. 
Merritt,     W.     G.     Social     Control     of 

Industrial  Strife.     Unpar.  Rev.  15:1- 

19,  Jan.-Mar.  '21. 
Mondolfo,  Rudolfo.    Le  condizioni  della 

rivoluzione.     Crit.     Soc.     30:374-76, 

Dec.  '20. 
Morck,    Fredrikke.     The    International 

Council    of    Women.     Sociale    Med. 

9:917-34, '20- 
Morgenthau,  Henry.     Our  New  Relation 

to   the   League  of  Nations.    World's 

Work  41:236,  237.     Jan.  '21. 
Morse,  J.    The  University  Commission 

on  Southern  Race  Question.     So.  .^tl. 

Quar.  19:302-10,  Oct.  '20. 


688 


THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 


Myers,  G.  E.  Mental  Health  of  Children. 
Amer.  Jour.  Pub.  Health  11:55-62, 
Jan.  '21. 

Nogaro,  Bertrand.  Les  recentes  conven- 
tions d'6migration  et  d'immigration. 
Rev.  pol.  et  parlem.  105:4(3-53,  Oct. 
'20. 

Oberholtzer,  Ellis  P.  AATiat  Are  the 
"Movies"  Making  of  Our  Children? 
World's  Work  41:249-63.  Jan.  '21. 

Palmer,  Frank  H.  The  Lure  of  the 
"Movies."  (Editorial.)  Educa.  41: 
268.     Dec.  '20. 

Potts,  W.  A.  The  Juvenile  Delinquent. 
Sch.  Hyg.  11:114-18.    Nov.  '20. 

Rowell,  Chester  H.  California  and  the 
Japanese  Problem.  Jour.  Ed.  92:463, 
464,  Nov.  II,  '20. 

Sasamori,  Junzo.  What  Are  the  Japa- 
nese Doing  toward  Americanization? 
Japan  Rev.  6:22-24.     Dec.  '20. 

Sears,  J.  H.  The  Cycle  of  Revolution. 
Forum  65:77-89,  Jan.  '21. 

Shideler,  Ernest  H.  A  Course  m 
Modem  Social  Problems  for  the  High 
School.  Sch.  Rev.  28:615-26.  Oct. 
'20. 

Sisley,  Le  Sjoidicalisme  anglais  et  son 
leader.  G.  D.  H.  Cole.  Rev.  pol. 
et  parlem.  105:245-60,  Nov.  '20. 

SUchter,  R.  H.  Industrial  Morale. 
Quar.  Jour.  Econ.  35:36-60,  Nov.  '20. 

Smith,  Lewis  Wilbur.  Americanization 
in  the  Thornton  Township  High 
School.  Sch.  Rev.  28:659-72.  Nov. '20. 

Stefansson,  ViLhjalmur.  Food  Tastes 
and  Food  Prejudices  of  Men  and 
Dogs.  Sci.  Mo.  11:540-43,  Dec. 
'20. 

Stoddard,  Lothrop.  Is  America  Ameri- 
can ?  Is  America  Able  to  Assimilate 
the  New  Flood  of  Alien  Immigrants? 
(Some  answers  by  foreign  doubting 
commentators.)  World's  Work  41: 
201-3.    Dec.  '20. 


Stoops,  J.  D.  The  Instinct  of  Workman- 
ship. Inteml.  Jour.  Ethics  31:183- 
99,  Jan.  '21. 

Storer,  Eustace.  Capital  and  Labor  in 
Italy.  Contemp.  Rev.  118:823-30, 
Dec.  '20. 

Talk}',  Truman  Hughes.  Garvey's  "Em- 
pire of  Ethiopia."  A  World  Move- 
ment for  the  Unification  of  Political 
and  Economic  Interest  of  All  Negroes 
Everywhere.  World's  Work  41 :  264- 
70.     Jan.  '21. 

The  New  Anti-Japanese  Legislation  in 
CaUfornIa:  An  Ofi&cial  Text.  Japan 
Rev.  6:11-13.     Nov. '20. 

Treves,  Claudio.  Socialismo  0  Comu- 
nismo?    Crit.  Soc.  30:369-71,  Dec. '20. 

VuoU,  Romeo.  Per  ima  magistratura 
comunale  del  lavoro.  Riv.  inteml.  de 
sci.  soc.  28:re-63,  Sept.-Oct.  '20. 

Waugh,  Frank  A.  The  Opportimity  of 
the  Country  Village.  House  Beauti- 
ful 48:276-78.     Oct.  '20. 

Weill,  Renee  G.  Technique  des  Enquetes 
d'Assistance.  Rev.  philan.  41:41-48, 
Sept.  '20. 

Westermarck,  E.  A.  The  Aaland  Ques- 
tion. Contemp.  Rev.  118:790-94, 
Dec.  '20. 

Widger)',  A.  G.  Sociology:  Its  Nature 
and  Scope,  Aims  and  Methods.  Ind. 
Jour.  Soc.  1:5-20,  Jan.  '20. 

Wiley,  George  M.  Adjusting  the  School 
System  to  the  New  World  Situation 
Through  the  Community  Center. 
Amer.  Ed.  24:113-15.     Nov.  '20. 

Willis,  H.  E.  North  Dakota's  Industrial 
Program  and  the  Law.  Survey  45: 
418-19,  Dec.  '20. 

Woodburne,  Angus  S.  The  Indianiza- 
tion  of  Christianity.  Jour.  ReUgion 
1:66-75,  J^^-  '20- 

Zeballos,  E.  S.  La  Diplomatic  des  Etats- 
Unis  dans  I'Amerique  du  Sud.  Rev. 
pol.  et  parlem.  104:328-47,  Sept.  '20. 


THE  AMERICAN 

JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 


Volume  XXVI  MAY     I  92  I  Number  6 


JUSTICE  AND  POVERTY 


ABBOTT  PAYSON  USHER 

Cornell  University 


The  discussions  of  the  proper  distribution  of  wealth  that  are 
now  so  common  usually  assume  two  propositions  that  are  in  fact 
highly  questionable.  A  just  distribution  of  wealth  is  assumed 
to  be  a  completely  satisfactory  end  of  social  endeavor,  and  society 
stands  condemned,  we  are  told,  if  the  distribution  of  wealth  is 
not  definitely  just.  It  is  likewise  presumed  that  justice  is  all  that 
can  or  should  be  expected  of  social  institutions.  These  assump- 
tions reveal  serious  misunderstanding  of  the  deeper  meanings  of 
the  principle  of  justice.  They  are  a  direct  result  of  the  tendency 
to  deem  just  those  arrangements  or  consequences  which  appeal 
to  the  sentiment  of  the  individual.  Justice  becomes  synonymous 
with  "right" — a  right  that  is  intuitively  perceived  and  hence 
agreeable  to  moral  sentiment.  Precisely  because  of  this  identi- 
fication of  justice  with  what  is  felt  to  be  right,  the  sentimentalist 
comes  to  regard  justice  as  the  summiim  bonum,  and,  with  reference 
to  social  arrangements,  all  that  can  be  desired. 

Underlying  this  sentimental  ideal  there  is  a  disposition  to 
think  of  justice  as  something  external;  something  contrived  or 
invented  by  thinkers  and  reformers,  bodied  forth  in  social  life 

689 


690  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

by  clever  institutional  arrangements  which  accomplish  that  pre- 
ponderance of  good  that  is  held  to  be  characteristic  of  the  "just" 
society.  The  organized  system  of  repression  and  retribution  seems 
to  the  naive  mind  an  exact  and  explicit  indication  that  justice 
is  indeed  something  external,  brought  into  social  life  by  men. 
Deep  down  in  the  thought  of  many  people  there  still  lurks  the 
notion  that  misdeeds  are  not  punished  unless  the  offender  is 
caught.  There  has  doubtless  been  some  progress  since  the  days 
of  Sparta,  for  few  would  actually  confess  to  the  belief  that  sin  is 
sin  only  if  it  is  detected.  The  naive  behef,  however,  persists 
despite  all  the  teachings  of  Hterature,  and  despite  a  profound 
but  obscure  consciousness  of  the  deeper  meanings  of  justice  which 
is  revealed  in  its  lowest  forms  by  melodrama  and  in  its  highest 
forms  by  Shakespearian  tragedy.  The  literary  ideal  of  justice, 
frequently  called  poetic  justice,  is  significant  because  it  expresses 
the  thoughts  of  the  greatest  thinkers  and  reflects  convictions 
that  are  common  to  all. 

Poetic  justice  is,  as  nearly  as  may  be,  the  opposite  of  the 
sentimental  ideal  of  justice.  Poetic  justice  is  a  principle  of  neces- 
sity: it  is  an  expression  of  rational  rather  than  emotional  needs. 
According  to  this  notion,  the  consequences  of  an  act  are  a  neces- 
sary and  inevitable  result  of  the  act  itself.  This  is  a  principle 
of  reason,  because  it  is  an  assertion  of  the  continuity  of  life  and 
consciousness  without  which  all  living  would  be  a  mere  jumble 
of  incident  devoid  of  moral  content  or  rational  meaning.  The 
tragic  literature  of  all  ages  is  dominated  by  this  conviction. 
"Whatsoever  ye  sow,  that  shall  ye  also  reap."  In  early  hterature 
the  process  of  retribution  involves  not  a  little  mystery;  the  indi- 
vidual is  compassed  about  by  spirits  whose  activities  seem  to  be 
external.  In  modern  literature  the  chain  of  circumstance  is  more 
closely  woven  into  the  incident  of  daily  life.  Evil  deeds  bring 
their  own  retribution  through  the  remorse  of  guilty  conscience  or 
through  a  final  catastrophe  created  by  the  succession  of  misdeeds 
committed  in  a  vain  attempt  to  avoid  detection  and  punishment. 

It  is  of  peculiar  significance  to  note  that  the  suffering  of  the 
innocent  victims  is  no  indication  that  there  is  no  justice  in  the 
world.     The  nature  and  existence  of  justice  is  to  be  discovered 


JUSTICE  AND  POVERTY  691 

only  in  the  relation  of  acts  and  their  consequences.  It  must  be 
evident  that  no  individual  can  be  guaranteed  such  independence 
and  isolation '  as  to  insure  him  against  any  possible  misconduct 
on  the  part  of  others.  In  its  extreme  form,  the  principle  of  justice 
requires  an  inconceivable  degree  of  isolation  and  a  hopeless 
enslavement  to  the  past.  Absolute  freedom  from  all  external 
interference  would  mean  that  nothing  could  break  into  the  stream 
of  individual  action,  whether  for  good  or  evil.  The  individual 
would  indeed  be  master  of  his  destiny,  but  the  errors  and  sins  of 
the  past  would  be  as  a  millstone  around  his  neck.  The  influences 
and  demands  of  social  life  destroy  the  self-sufficiency  of  the 
individual  that  is  implied  in  the  conception  of  justice. 

The  stream  of  circumstance  in  which  we  live  is  not  really  con- 
tinuous to  the  extent  implied.  All  the  possible  consequences  of 
our  acts  seldom  have  the  opportunity  to  reveal  their  full  content 
before  other  acts  have  broken  the  chain  of  circumstance  and 
thwarted  necessity  of  its  grim  fulfilment.  The  rational  disposi- 
tion to  conceive  of  life  as  wholly  continuous  slurs  over  many  things 
that  are  persistently  thrust  upon  our  attention  if  we  observe  the 
movement  of  real  events  with  any  care.  It  is  this  failure  to 
carry  every  act  to  its  logical  conclusion  that  engenders  the  myster- 
ies of  life,  giving  it  an  element  of  unexpectedness  without  entirely 
destroying  that  rhythmic  structure  that  makes  it  intelligible  even 
though  the  chain  of  circumstances  is  interrupted  in  a  variety  of 
ways.  A  world  that  was  merely  just  would  be  wholly  unreal. 
Life  is  neither  as  logical  nor  as  pitiless  as  the  principles  of  pure 
justice  would  require. 

Both  of  the  fundamental  convictions  of  the  sentimentalist  are 
false.  The  existence  of  evil  and  of  injustice  in  the  world  is  no 
proof  that  there  is  no  such  thing  as  justice  in  our  existing  social 
order.  However  much  suffering  we  may  endure  personally  or 
behold  as  spectators,  we,  like  Job,  must  maintain  unshaken  the 
faith  that  our  lives  are  not  mere  capricious  successions  of  mean- 
ingless events.  To  lose  faith  in  the  existence  of  some  rational 
meaning  in  life  is  unconditional  surrender.  No  doubt  at  times  it 
seems  as  if  absolute  rationality — continuity — could  alone  make 
life  worth  living,  but  it  is  a  delusion  to  suppose  that  a  solution  of 


692  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

difficulties  can  be  found  in  that  complete  mastery  of  destiny 
implied  in  the  principle  of  justice.  It  would  not  be  enough  if 
the  world  were  to  become  merely  just.  We  could  not  even  then 
intone  a  grateful  "Nunc  dimittis."  Even  if  every  one  were  to 
become  the  absolute  master  of  his  destiny  for  good  or  for  ill,  and 
all  were  to  become  so  moral  as  never  to  interfere  with  the  fulfil- 
ment of  the  ends  and  desires  of  others,  even  in  that  millennium  of 
the  individuahst  there  would  be  something  lacking.  The  imper- 
fections and  incompletenesses  of  the  individual  would  make  that 
millennial  state  a  torture  chamber  fit  to  be  compared  with  the 
hells  of  Dante's  vision.  Unless  we  were  to  become  gods,  we 
could  not  cheerfully  accept  the  complete  mastery  of  our 
destinies. 

II 

The  limitations  of  the  conception  of  justice  are  of  peculiar 
significance  with  reference  to  the  distribution  of  wealth.  It  is 
of  the  essence  of  justice  that  acts  be  judged  with  reference  to  the 
point  of  view  of  the  doer.  The  protest  against  judgments  based 
on  conventions  is  merely  an  expression  of  this  conviction.  The 
content  of  the  act  and  the  intention  of  the  doer  always  mean 
more  to  us  than  any  conventional  classifications  of  right  and 
wrong.  Acts  are  not  right  or  wrong  because  they  conform  or 
fail  to  conform  to  social  conventions;  their  meaning  is  to  be 
discovered  only  in  their  full  content  in  the  consciousness  of  the 
doer.  This  fundamental  importance  of  the  individual  point  of 
view  makes  it  easy  to  apply  the  principle  of  justice  to  the  moral 
aspects  of  actions.  Each  individual  does  in  a  measure  constitute 
a  moral  universe;  he  is,  indeed,  a  microcosm  set  over  against 
all  that  is  external  to  his  consciousness.  The  exclusion  of  external 
influences  from  certain  judgments  is  therefore  intelligible  and 
intensely  real.  Even  though  there  be  some  mysterious  affinity 
between  mind  and  mind,  so  that  our  feeling  of  individual  isolation 
should  really  be  deemed  an  illusion  that  will  ultimately  be  over- 
come, we  must  none  the  less  admit  that  our  philosophies  and 
our  ethical  systems  rest  upon  this  postulate  of  the  isolated  indi- 
vidual whose  means  of  communication  with  the  outside  world 


JUSTICE  AND  POVERTY  693 

are  imperfect  and  whose  relations  to  it  are  subordinated  to  ends 
that  are  selfish,  in  a  lower  or  in  a  higher  sense. 

The  production  and  distribution  of  wealth  is  fundamentally  a 
social  process.  The  individual  cannot  be  treated  as  an  isolated 
unit.  In  isolation  the  individual  could  accomplish  little.  Further- 
more, the  significance  of  economic  activities  is  determined  prima- 
rily by  their  appeal  to  the  needs  and  desires  of  others.  The  fact 
that  Whistler  painted  the  famous  Nocturne  in  a  few  hours  with 
little  apparent  effort  was  no  indication  that  the  high  price  set 
upon  it  was  unfair  or  unjust.  The  significance  of  the  result 
was  not  revealed  or  measured  by  the  painfulness  of  the  effort  to 
the  artist.  Pleasure  is  paid  for  as  well  as  pain,  and  sometimes 
more  bountifully.  There  is  a  great  temptation  to  seek  for  some 
direct  connection  between  the  quantum  of  effort  and  the  amount 
of  the  reward.  This  would,  indeed,  be  a  legitimate  application 
of  the  principle  that  there  must  be  a  direct  connection  between 
each  act  and  its  consequences.  The  analogy  between  moral  acts 
and  productive  efforts  does  not  hold.  Productive  efforts  are  not 
the  acts  of  isolated  individuals,  nor  can  they  be  appraised  exclu- 
sively from  the  point  of  view  of  the  doer,  like  moral  acts.  The 
sacrifices  and  efforts  of  the  producer  are  the  least  significant 
factor  in  the  valuation  of  the  product.  The  palpably  great  efforts 
of  unskilful  singers  or  actors  furnish  notable  illustrations.  The 
beautifully  finished  performance  is  not  only  achieved  with  less 
evident  effort,  but  frequently  with  quantitatively  less  effort  than  is 
put  forth  by  unskilful  performers.  In  a  boat  race,  for  instance,  it  is 
entirely  conceivable  that  the  losing  crew  should  have  exerted  more 
foot  pounds  of  energy  than  the  winners.  Efficiency  in  many  things 
means  that  energy  is  being  exerted  with  economy,  with  a  mini- 
mum waste  in  internal  resistances.  Results  are  not  directly  pro- 
portional to  sacrifices,  if  we  judge  the  results  from  the  social 
point  of  view.  With  the  individual  it  is  different.  The  hopelessly 
mediocre  painting,  the  inept  and  futile  model  of  some  proposed 
invention  may  contain  a  wealth  of  meaning  to  their  creators  that 
no  masterpiece  could  convey  to  them.  Worthless  things  may 
well  furnish  their  creators  with  significant  spiritual  experiences. 


694  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

Whenever  the  individual  appraisal  of  results  is  set  over  against 
the  social  appraisal,  there  will  inevitably  be  discrepancies  which 
may  seem  to  indicate  injustice  in  the  distribution  of  wealth.  But 
criticisms  of  distribution  based  on  allegations  of  such  defects  involve 
a  misunderstanding  of  the  conception  of  justice  and  a  failure  to 
appreciate  the  difficulties  of  applying  to  social  problems  a 
conception  that  is  so  essentially  individualistic. 

In  no  society  can  there  be  the  close  correspondence  between 
productive  effort  and  reward  that  exists  in  the  moral  realm 
between  acts  and  their  consequences.  The  productive  process  is 
essentially  a  joint  process,  involving  the  unconscious,  and,  at 
times,  the  unwilling  co-operation  of  vast  numbers  of  individuals. 
The  efforts  of  a  particular  individual  cannot  be  clearly  distin- 
guished. No  special  part  or  share  of  the  product  can  be  attrib- 
uted specifically  to  him.  Granted  that  he  should  receive  "that 
which  is  his,"  there  is  no  means  of  ascertaining  precisely  what  is 
his.  The  principle  of  justice  would  require  that  he  should  receive 
such  portion  of  the  joint  product  as  can  be  attributed  to  his 
efforts.  Not  his  sacrifice,  but  his  contribution  to  the  final  accom- 
phshment  is  the  proper  measure  of  his  reward.  As  a  principle, 
this  would  be  an  adequate  rendering  of  the  more  general  statement 
that  justice  consists  in  the  necessary  connection  between  acts 
and  their  consequences.  Remuneration  in  proportion  to  the  prod- 
uct would  indeed  express  a  necessary  connection  between  produc- 
tive effort  and  its  reward.  Some  such  principle,  too,  seems  to  be 
implicit  in  the  system  of  production  and  distribution  under  "free 
competition."  There  is  a  connection  between  efforts  and  prod- 
ucts, but  it  is  of  such  a  nature  that  we  can  never  adequately 
express  this  individual  productivity  in  the  wage  or  salary.  We 
may  say  that  a  competitive  society  is  just  in  principle,  but  we 
must  needs  admit  that  this  principle  is  not  as  clearly  manifested 
as  it  is  in  the  field  of  ethics. 

Sooner  or  later  the  ethical  content  of  an  act  will  be  revealed 
to  the  individual.  Even  the  most  unimaginative  criminal  has  the 
meaning  of  his  deeds  borne  in  upon  him  at  last.  Retribution  may 
come  in  the  more  direct  form  of  a  fmal  catastrophe,  as  to  IMacbeth; 
or  there  may  be  more  of  the  drama  of  conscience  in  it  all,  as  with 


JUSTICE  AND  POVERTY  695 

Hamlet's  mother  and  uncle.  The  content  of  the  deed  is  ultimately 
revealed  to  the  doer.  Social  devices,  police,  detectives,  and  courts 
may  faciHtate  this  process,  but  even  without  any  mechanism  the  evil 
content  of  misdeeds  would  become  known.  Similarly  the  content 
of  just  deeds  becomes  known  to  the  individual.  In  some  small 
measure,  criminal  purposes  may  be  forestalled  and  circumvented, 
but  innocence  can  be  protected  only  in  a  measure.  The  mecha- 
nism of  suppression  can  do  little  more  than  express  objectively  the 
truths  that  emerge  ultimately  in  the  inner  Kfe  of  the  individuals 
concerned.  In  the  realm  of  ethics,  therefore,  we  may  speak  of 
justice  as  certain. 

In  the  material  world,  distributive  justice  cannot  be  certain. 
All  appraisals  are  subject  to  some  errors,  larger  or  smaller  as  the 
case  may  be.  The  valuation  of  the  social  product  is  not  certain. 
The  valuation  of  the  efforts  of  particular  laborers  and  classes  of 
laborers  is  even  more  uncertain.  Most  of  the  product  is  distrib- 
uted before  its  final  values  can  be  known.  The  process  of  pro- 
duction is  directed  with  reference  to  expectations,  and  many 
workers  are  paid  in  terms  of  these  expectations.  The  contribution 
of  the  individual  to  the  joint  product  is  thus  unknowable;  within 
some  considerable  margin  of  error,  the  individual's  contribution 
may  be  ascertained  by  processes  of  imputation  and  computation, 
but  not  with  any  certainty.  Furthermore,  all  these  acts  of 
appraisal  must  be  repeated  over  and  over  again.  They  must 
be  made  in  each  case  for  stated  periods  of  time  and  with  reference 
to  conditions  that  will  change.  There  is  no  chance  for  the  cor- 
rection of  errors,  no  eternity  in  which  one  may  wait  patiently  for 
the  revelation  of  truth.  Action  in  the  ethical  realm  is  more 
closely  related  to  the  eternal  verities.  The  continuous  elements 
of  reahty  are  fundamental.  In  the  material  world  we  are  closer 
to  the  flux  of  Hfe.  The  submergence  of  the  individual  in  the 
complex  stream  of  circumstance  keeps  the  discontinuity  of  life 
ever  present.  The  notion  of  justice,  a  principle  of  continuity, 
thus  means  less  in  the  material  world.  It  is  less  clearly  revealed 
to  us,  and  such  principle  as  we  do  discover  is  less  certainly  mani- 
fest. We  may  say  with  some  assurance  that  no  society  will  ever 
achieve  any  large  measure  of  justice  in  the  distribution  of  wealth. 


696  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

We  may  say  this  without  pessimism  and  without  despair;  for 
justice  in  and  of  itself  cannot  make  life  worth  living,  nor  can  the 
absence  of  a  perfect  and  certain  justice  in  distribution  destroy 
any  of  the  deeper  meanings  of  life, 

III 

Recent  studies  of  the  distribution  of  wealth  have  revealed 
conditions  that  seem  to  admit  no  favorable  interpretation.  In 
the  United  Kingdom,  11  per  cent  of  the  population  controls 
about  one-half  the  total  income;  in  the  United  States,  18 
per  cent  of  the  population  controls  45  per  cent  of  the  income. 
Many  aspects  of  these  statistical  summaries  are  open  to  question; 
the  most  carefully  prepared  figures  are  at  best  only  a  crude 
approximation  to  the  truth,  but  with  these  allowances  the  figures 
must  be  accepted  as  an  account  of  the  larger  facts  with  reference 
to  the  distribution  of  wealth.  The  conclusions  to  be  drawn  from 
these  figures,  however,  are  by  no  means  self-evident.  There  is 
no  warrant  for  treating  these  percentages  as  prima  facie  evidence 
of  injustice  in  the  distribution  of  wealth.  The  full  presentation 
of  the  statistical  problem  would  be  out  of  place  here,  and  it  is  not 
desirable  to  create  the  impression  that  it  is  possible  to  prove  any 
specific  conclusion.  It  should  therefore  be  sufficient  to  suggest 
that  these  facts  may  indicate  conditions  that  are  not  sinister. 

It  is  not  difficult  to  secure  the  tacit  assent  of  reader  or 
audience  when  it  is  suggested  that  just  apportionment  of  wealth 
should  result  in  substantial  equahty,  so  that  given  portions  of  the 
population  should  receive  equivalent  proportions  of  the  total 
income.  Now  few  would  presume  that  absolute  equality  of  distri- 
bution would  be  possible;  it  would  be  admitted  by  most  people 
that  some  moderate  differences  of  income  are  reasonable  as  an 
expression  of  the  differences  in  capacity.  It  is  seldom  that  people 
realize  how  these  moderate  differences  would  affect  the  gross 
percentages. 

"A  concrete  example,"  says  Professor  Young,  "may  give  point 
to  this  consideration.  Suppose  that  incomes  in  an  imaginary 
society  were  distributed  symmetrically  around  the  modal  or  most 
common  income,  in  the  form  of  a  normal  frequency  distribution. 


JUSTICE  AND  POVERTY  697 

This  might  represent  either  one  of  two  things:  (i)  a  normal  distri- 
bution of  ability  and  a  perfect  proportioning  of  income  to  ability; 
(2)  a  random  or  chance  distribution  of  incomes,  under  the  influence 
of  complex  but  unbiassed  forces.  This  second  condition  would 
be  consistent  with  the  existence  of  real  equality  of  opportunity, 
broadly  understood,  coupled  with  the  presence  of  a  myriad  of 
small  circumstances  that  might  deflect  one  towards  a  lower  or  a 
higher  portion  of  the  income  range.  Now  suppose  that  the  aver- 
age family  income  is  $1,500  and  that  half  of  the  families  get 
incomes  that  are  within  $200  of  this  average.  Under  such  condi- 
tions the  richer  half  of  the  families  would  get  58  per  cent  of  the 
aggregate  income  and  the  poorer  half  would  get  42  per  cent. 
Increase  the  dispersion  of  distribution  somewhat,  so  that  half  of 
the  incomes  are  between  $1,000  and  $2,000.  Then  70  per  cent 
of  the  aggregate  income  would  go  to  the  richer  half  of  the  population, 
and  30  per  cent  to  the  poorer  half.  Increase  the  limits  between 
which  half  of  the  incomes  fall  to  $800  and  $2,200,  and  the  portion 
of  the  aggregate  income  assigned  to  the  richer  half  of  the  popula- 
tion becomes  78  per  cent,  leaving  22  per  cent  to  the  poorer  half. 

"I  do  not  think  that  Dr.  King's  recent  estimates  err  in  the 
direction  of  underestimating  the  present  inequality  in  the  distri- 
bution of  incomes  in  the  United  States.  He  assigns  about  27 
per  cent  of  the  aggregate  income  to  the  poorer  half  of  the  families 
and  73  per  cent  ot  the  richer  half.  But  this  is  a  slightly  smaller 
degree  of  concentration  than  would  be  given  by  a  normal  frequency 
distribution  with  half  the  incomes  falling  between  $900  and  $2,100. 
This  suggests  that  no  single  or  general  statement  of  the  degree  of 
concentration  can  give,  by  itself,  an  adequate  notion  of  the  extent 
to  which  the  existing  distribution  of  wealth  has  to  be  deemed 

unsatisfactory The  amount  of  concentration,  the  amount 

of  departure  from  a  condition  of  uniform  incomes,  does  not  matter 
so  much  as  does  the  particular  form  of  the  income  distribution 
underlying  the  concentration." 

Particular  kinds  of  concentration  may  be  unfortunate,  and 
there  are  grounds  for  believing  that  some  aspects  of  the  present 
distribution  of  incomes  are  abnormal  and  undesirable.  It  would 
seem  that  there  is  an  undue  porportion  of  very  large  incomes  and 


698  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

an  abnormally  small  number  of  incomes  intermediate  in  size 
between  the  very  large  incomes  and  the  average  income.  These 
large  incomes  are  not  individual  incomes  in  the  strict  sense  of  the 
word,  though  industrial  conditions  have  placed  them  in  the  hands 
of  individuals.  Such  wealth  is  really  social  in  its  origin,  the  cumu- 
lative result  of  the  changes  in  industrial  technique  that  have 
been  the  work  of  two  or  three  generations  of  men,  inventors  and 
captains  of  industry.  There  has  been  some  caprice,  perhaps,  in 
the  massing  of  the  profits  in  the  hands  of  particular  individuals, 
and  yet  the  mere  size  of  the  income  has  made  it  impossible  to 
devote  such  fortunes  to  purely  individual  ends.  The  larger  por- 
tion of  such  fortunes  has,  in  fact,  been  devoted  to  social  uses. 
If  desirable,  the  disposition  of  such  incomes  could  be  significantly 
altered  without  destroying  the  competitive  character  of  social 
organization. 

The  severest  criticism  of  the  concentration  of  wealth,  however, 
has  been  based  upon  a  slightly  different  use  of  these  statistics  of 
income.  Division  of  the  total  income  of  the  United  Kingdom  by 
the  total  number  of  families  seems  to  indicate  that  an  equal  dis- 
tribution per  family  would  enable  all  to  live  in  substantial  comfort. 
Each  family  might  have  $1,100.  Similar  possiblities  exist  in  the 
United  States.  These  figures  and  sundry  statistics  of  production 
have  lead  some  economists  to  declare  that  poverty  can  be  abol- 
ished. William  Smart,  the  English  economist,  says  that  these 
figures  present  a  "dazzling  possibility;"  he  is  not  sure  that  the 
results  could  actually  be  accomplished,  because  it  might  be  impos- 
sible to  induce  people  to  concent  to  the  reduction  of  all  incomes  to 
an  equality.  Professor  Hollander  cherishes  a  stronger  conviction. 
"Like  preventable  disease,"  he  writes,  "economic  want  persists 
as  a  social  ill  only  because  men  do  not  sufficiently  desire  that  it 
shall  cease.  There  is  still  much  mumbling  of  common-places, 
and  it  has  seemed  worth  while  to  emphasize  anew  this  definite 
corollary  of  modern  political  economy,  that  the  essential  causes  of 
poverty  are  determinable  and  its  considerable  presence  unneces- 
sary." 

These  expectations  are  based  upon  an  illusion.  The  develop- 
ment of  the  present  industrial  system  forces  all  to  strive  for  pur- 


JUSTICE  AND  POVERTY  699 

chasing  power.  Scarcely  any  worker  today  feels  conscious  of  any 
struggle  with  nature.  We  all  seek  money  incomes,  assuming  that 
if  there  is  money  in  hand,  all  material  goods  can  surely  be  pro- 
cured. A  couple  of  centuries  ago,  when  industry  was  proportion- 
ately less  important  and  the  primacy  of  agriculture  definitely 
recognized,  there  was  a  greater  disposition  to  think  in  terms  of 
commodities.  Prosperity  or  distress  depended  upon  the  character 
of  the  harvests,  and  it  was  not  merely  a  matter  of  having  a  greater 
or  a  smaller  money  income,  but  an  actual  difference  in  the  abun- 
dance of  food.  The  problem  of  getting  through  until  the  next 
harvest,  which  has  become  with  us  a  war  problem,  was  with 
them  a  persistent  feature  of  life.  In  those  days  none  could  forget 
that  the  struggle  to  provide  for  material  wants  was  in  reality  a 
struggle  with  nature,  rendered  hazardous  and  uncertain  by  the 
caprice  of  seasons.  When  dearth  came  it  was  accepted  with 
resignation,  and,  in  the  less  fertile  districts  which  never  afforded 
bountiful  subsistence,  the  persistent  pressure  of  hardship  was 
likewise  borne  with  resignation.  In  the  midst  of  such  circum- 
stances it  was  not  difficult  to  explain  poverty;  the  humblest  under- 
stood. 

Now  that  this  struggle  with  nature  has  become  less  direct,  so 
that  the  economic  problem  seems  to  be  merely  a  struggle  for 
purchasing  power,  poverty  is  not  so  easy  to  understand.  There 
seems  to  be  an  abundance  of  goods  if  only  there  is  money  to  buy 
them.  Employment  at  a  sufficient  wage  seems  to  be  the  only 
difficulty;  to  the  workman,  the  obstacle  that  stands  between  him 
and  adequate  maintenance  is  not  a  capricious  and  uncertain 
Nature  but  the  niggardly  employer.  The  direct  obstacles  always 
assimie  concrete  human  or  social  form.  The  existence  of  poverty 
seems  to  be  positive  proof  that  there  is  some  vital  defect  in  the 
mechanism  of  this  industrial  society  that  offers  all  things  in  its 
markets  and  withholds  the  wage  that  would  enable  the  workman 
to  buy. 

The  apparent  abundance  in  the  markets  is  misunderstood. 
The  caprices  and  niggardliness  of  Nature  are  not  overcome  and 
done  away  with  by  making  the  struggle  less  direct.  Purchasing 
power  is  not  food  and  drink,  raiment  and  shelter;    nor  does  the 


700  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

apparent  offer  of  all  things  for  a  price  guarantee  such  abundance 
that  all  may  be  fed  and  clothed. 

Return  for  a  moment  to  the  dazzling  prospect  held  forth  by 
the  equal  division  of  purchasing  power  among  all  the  families  of 
the  United  Kingdom.  By  the  simplest  process  of  arithmetic  it 
is  demonstrated  that  there  is  sufficient  purchasing  power  for  all. 
This  purchasing  power  will  be  sufficient,  however,  subject  to  two 
conditions.  The  general  level  of  prices  must  remain  unchanged 
and  there  must  be  enough  goods  to  supply  the  demands  of  willing 
purchasers.  It  is  scarcely  conceivable  that  either  of  these  condi- 
tions would  be  fulfilled. 

If  by  some  act  of  magic  the  division  of  incomes  were  carried 
out  overnight,  there  would  be  a  most  serious  lack  of  adjustment 
between  supplies  and  demands.  There  would  be  too  many  motor 
cars,  too  many  fine  silks,  too  much  champagne.  The  supplies  of 
meat,  cereals,  cottons,  and  medium  grade  woolens  would  be  inad- 
equate. Many  house  servants  would  be  discharged.  Prices  would 
inevitably  change.  Many  radicals  would  rejoice  in  this  read- 
justment of  production  to  the  legitimate  needs  of  the  population. 
The  curtailment  of  luxurious  consumption  and  the  deflection  into 
other  channels  of  the  labor  set  free  would  be  regarded  as  an  esti- 
mable result  of  the  change  in  the  distribution  of  wealth.  The 
lack  of  goods  would  be  only  temporary,  according  to  the  radical. 

We  cannot  be  certain  that  the  lack  of  goods  would  be  tem- 
porary. The  redistribution  of  incomes,  if  permanent,  must  imply 
that  such  incomes  are  received  in  return  for  labor.  After  the 
first  redivision,  it  must  be  assumed  that  these  incomes  are  earned. 
Now  the  income  of  the  majority  of  the  families  of  the  artisan 
classes  would  be  increased  by  about  one-third  by  such  a  division. 
If  the  new  incomes  were  paid  to  them  as  wages,  wages  would  have 
to  be  significantly  increased.  Such  an  increase  in  wages  would 
inevitably  mean  an  increase  in  all  prices,  and  with  the  increase  in 
prices  would  disappear  all  hope  that  the  equal  incomes  per  family 
would  afford  adequate  maintenance.  The  prospect  suggested  by 
the  statistics  of  income  is  thus  pure  illusion,  because  it  is  based 
on  the  assumption  that  the  purchasing  power  assigned  to  each 
family  would  always  command  as  much  in  the  markets  as  it  does 
today. 


JUSTICE  AND  POVERTY  701 

IV 

The  disposition  to  treat  the  problem  of  poverty  as  a  problem 
of  justice  in  distribution  is  unfortunate.  It  is  not  true  that  the 
material  comfort  of  the  wealthy  and  the  middle  classes  is  enjoyed 
at  the  expense  of  the  poor;  nor  is  it  true  that  the  misery  of  the 
poor  is  merited,  a  just  judgment  upon  deficiency  and  inefficiency. 
It  is  naive  to  suppose  that  difficulties  and  evils  are  all  due  to 
human  wickedness,  and  that  all  of  them  can  be  overcome  by  mere 
honesty  and  competency  in  high  places.  Nothing  is  explained  or 
accomplished  by  this  disposition  to  apply  opprobrious  terms  to 
either  rich  or  poor,  and  it  would  seem  that  effective  study  of 
poverty  and  its  alleviation  would  be  most  significantly  furthered 
by  abandoning  this  unfruitful  discussion  of  justice. 

Questions  of  right  are  likely  to  be  determined  in  the  light  of 
personal  convictions,  so  with  characteristic  certainty  that  happi- 
ness and  virtue  must  needs  go  hand  in  hand,  the  mid- Victorian 
adopted  the  simple  program  of  preaching  middle-class  virtues  to 
the  poor.  Smaller  families,  higher  standards  of  comfort,  and  good 
middle-class  prudence  were  deemed  a  sufficient  solution.  The 
earher  writings  of  Miss  Jane  Addams  furnish  a  significant  com- 
mentary. Her  work  in  the  slums  was  begun  under  the  influence 
of  this  mid- Victorian  idealism.  The  settlement  was  to  afford  the 
means  of  teaching  these  ideals.  But  the  aspiring  teacher  soon 
discovered  that  she  was  really  the  pupil,  learning  the  terrible 
lesson  of  the  slum:  that  large  familes  represent  the  wisdom  and 
prudence  of  the  slum  as  truly  as  small  families  represent  the  col- 
lective wisdom  of  the  middle  class.  It  has  been  the  achievement 
of  this  generation  to  attain  sufficient  knowledge  of  the  slum  to 
imderstand  its  life,  at  least  in  a  measure.  Many  thoughtful 
workers  have  been  reaching  out  toward  this  same  truth  that  large 
families  are  an  inevitable  outcome  of  slum  conditions. 

The  life  of  the  slum  is  dominated  by  the  grim  necessity  of 
rearing  large  families  as  a  provision  for  old  age,  despite  the  sever- 
ity of  the  economic  pressure  caused  by  these  numbers.  Life  in 
the  slum  runs  in  a  vicious  circle.  It  is  a  wheel  of  life  from  which 
the  individual  can  scarcely  ever  entirely  escape.  The  situation 
is  vividly  described  by  Seebohm  Rowntree  with  reference  to  York, 


702  TBE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

England.  The  newborn  child  is  nearly  if  not  quite  adequately 
nourished.  At  the  age  of  three  or  four,  the  child  must  begin  to 
share  the  privations  of  the  family.  When  the  adolescent  boy  or 
girl  begins  to  contribute  something  to  the  family  income  at 
twelve  or  earher,  more  adequate  provision  for  its  wants  is  possible, 
must  indeed  be  made  in  hopes  of  maintaining  the  earning  power 
of  the  family.  Between  eighteen  and  twenty-two  the  average 
youth  is  fairly  prosperous,  his  wages  are  about  as  high  as  they  are 
likely  to  become  and  his  responsibihties  are  limited  to  the  provision 
for  his  personal  wants.  Rarely  would  he  feel  any  obligation  to 
his  parents.  This  condition  of  well-being  cannot  long  continue. 
If  he  is  prudent,  he  marries.  The  wages  which  were  wholly 
adequate  for  his  needs  become  relatively  inadequate  for  the  needs 
of  the  family,  particularly  when  it  becomes  necessary  for  his  wife 
to  give  up  her  work.  The  rearing  of  the  children  subjects  the 
family  to  a  period  of  pressure.  Some  members  must  needs  be 
undernourished  and  ill  provided  with  clothing.  Much  of  the 
burden  falls  upon  the  mother.  Any  serious  illness  or  accident 
to  any  member  of  the  family  may,  at  this  period,  result  in  definite 
pauperism.  There  is  no  margin  for  unusual  expenditures.  Now 
it  will  be  apparent  that  the  only  provison  for  the  declining  years 
of  the  parents  is  a  number  of  unmarried  children  capable  of  making 
some  contribution  toward  the  support  of  their  parents.  Unless 
the  family  is  fairly  large  there  will  be  no  unmarried  children  when 
the  parents  reach  the  age  of  forty-five.  It  will  also  be  evident 
that  the  burden  of  supporting  an  elderly  parent  cannot  be  borne 
by  one  unmarried  child. 

Provision  for  the  years  of  impaired  earning  power  is  thus  the 
dominant  feature  of  the  life  of  the  poor.  It  would  seem  that  the 
primary  sohcitude  of  reformers  should  be  provision  for  old  age. 
This  is  indeed  a  prominent  feature  in  modern  social  legislation, 
but  the  study  of  the  details  of  modern  insurance  statutes  affords 
abundant  evidence  of  the  intrinsic  difficulty  of  the  problem.  The 
earning  power  of  the  manual  worker  is  likely  to  decline  after 
forty-five,  and  at  fifty  the  average  individual  would  be  partially, 
if  not  wholly,  dependent.  Significant  attack  upon  the  problem 
of  poverty  would  thus  require  provision  of  old-age  pensions  begin- 


JUSTICE  AND  POVERTY  703 

ning  at  the  age  of  fifty  or  fifty-five  at  the  latest.  The  age  limits 
in  the  various  insurance  laws  are  much  higher:  sixty-five  in 
Australasia,  seventy  in  Germany  and  Great  Britain.  In  Germany 
considerable  numbers  of  workmen  become  entirely  dependent 
before  they  reach  the  age  of  seventy,  and  though  they  will  have  a 
right  to  a  pension  ultimately,  they  have  neither  the  means  to 
live  nor  the  means  to  contribute  the  necessary  payments  to  the 
insurance  fund.  In  such  cases  the  Poor  Law  authorities  provide 
for  the  immediate  needs  of  the  individual  and  also  make  the  pay- 
ments to  the  insurance  fund.  If  the  man  lives  to  the  age  of 
seventy  he  becomes  a  recipient  of  an  old-age  pension  and  ceases 
to  receive  an  allowance  as  a  pauper.  The  Germans  entertained 
high  hopes  of  their  insurance  legislation,  but  it  has  neither  dimin- 
ished the  relative  amount  of  dependency  in  the  community  nor 
the  relative  expenditure  for  poor  relief.  These  measures  were 
designed  to  supplant  at  least  a  certain  amount  of  poor  relief,  and, 
if  the  scheme  were  adapted  to  the  accomplishment  of  its  evident 
intentions,  it  would  doubtless  diminish  expenditure  for  the  relief 
of  the  aged  poor.  The  failure  to  achieve  this  result  is  probably 
due  to  the  excessively  high  age  limits.  These  pension  laws  will 
probably  fail  to  produce  the  desired  results  until  the  age  limits 
are  significantly  reduced. 

The  financial  problems  that  would  be  created  by  such  a  change 
in  the  age  limits  of  the  pension  laws,  apart  from  any  increase  in 
the  small  stipends  now  furnished,  would  have  strained  the  budgets 
of  the  leading  countries  even  before  the  war.  The  insurance 
laws  are  an  enormous  burden  as  they  stand,  and  each  year  that 
the  age  limit  was  reduced  would  increase  the  financial  obligations 
by  immense  sums.  These  comments  must  not  be  interpreted  as 
a  criticism  of  the  existing  laws.  The  statutes  as  they  stand  are 
productive  of  much  good,  and  they  may  lead  to  larger  results, 
but  it  is  essential  to  realize  clearly  why  such  acts  fail  to  accom- 
plish all  that  has  been  anticipated.  The  logic  of  these  laws  is 
sound,  but  it  is  not  wholly  a  question  of  logic.  It  is  also  a  ques- 
tion of  finance,  and  it  may  be  permitted  to  doubt  the  possibility 
of  ever  carrying  such  a  reform  to  its  logical  conclusion.  Much 
good  may  be  done,  however,  even  if  all  the  anticipations  of  the 


704  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

most  optimistic  reformers  are  not  realized.  Poverty  is  not  a 
permanent  condition  even  today,  if  we  may  trust  the  analysis  of 
Mr,  Rowntree.  Primary  poverty  is  felt  during  the  earlier  years 
of  married  life,  and  many  families  rise  out  of  this  position  of 
extreme  pressure.  Well  conceived  remedial  legislation  can  doubt- 
less diminish  the  length  of  this  period  of  pressure,  mitigate  some  of 
the  hardships,  and  make  it  easier  for  the  individual  and  the  family 
to  rise  out  of  this  condition.  If  ideals  of  individual  responsibility 
are  to  be  retained,  there  must  be  some  possibility  of  failure,  but 
the  result  of  economic  failure  need  not  extend  beyond  a  proba- 
tionary interval,  and  this  interval  can  be  used  for  vocational 
training.  Even  if  poverty  cannot  be  abolished,  it  need  not  be  a 
condition  of  abject  misery  unrelieved  by  prospects  of  ultimate 
achievement  of  a  decent  standard  of  living. 


THE  SOCIAL  PHILOSOPHY  OF  THE 
LOCO-FOCO  DEMOCRACY 


WILLIAM  TRIMBLE 

Department  of  History  and  Social  Science,  North  Dakota  Agricultural  College 


In  a  recent  number  of  this  Journal  (May,  19 18)  there  appeared 
a  significant  article  from  the  pen  of  Professor  WilHam  E.  Dodd  on 
*'The  Social  Philosophy  of  the  Old  South,"  in  which  is  described 
the  development  of  an  aristocratic  conception  of  society  which  by 
the  middle  thirties  had  come  to  dominate  the  philosophy  of  southern 
leaders.  It  is  a  matter  of  no  little  moment  in  the  history  of  democ- 
racy that,  at  about  the  time  the  aristocrats  of  the  South  were  repudi- 
ating the  ideas  of  Jefferson  as  "glittering  fallacies,"  a  determined 
group  of  common  men  in  the  city  of  New  York  were  re-emphasizing 
and  reformulating  those  ideas  and  promulgating  anew  the  precepts 
of  a  philosophy  founded  on  the  theory  of  human  equality. 

The  movement  began  to  assume  definite  form  in  the  fall  of 
1835  as  a  mutiny  within  the  Tammany  organization  against  the 
domination  of  a  conservative  element.  It  soon  grew  into  a  separate 
party  which  called  itself  the  Equal  Rights  Party,  but  which  is 
better  known  in  history  under  the  fantastic  sobriquet  of  "Loco- 
Foco,"  a  term  first  applied  in  derision  by  its  enemies.  The  party 
was  active  in  a  few  local  campaigns  and  held  two  state  conventions 
in  one  of  which  it  formulated  an  interesting  model  for  a  revision  of 
the  state  constitution.  It  also  fostered  noteworthy  mass  meetings 
in  New  York  City.  Its  achievements  as  a  party  organization, 
however,  were  not  impressive,  since  its  nominees  at  no  time 
secured  more  than  5000  votes.  Yet  it  did  effect  an  important 
revolution  in  Tammany  which  allowed  reunion  in  the  fall  of  1837, 
its  career  closing  thus  after  scarcely  two  years  of  separate  pohtical 
activity. 

Though  in  duration  and  in  number  of  adherents  this  Equal 
Rights  Party  was  almost  negligible,  its  significance  is  enhanced  by 
consideration  of  some  of  the  forces  back  of  it.     Its  existence  was 

705 


7o6  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

made  possible  by  that  tremendous  innovation  in  the  world's  prac- 
tice of  pohtics — American  manhood  suffrage.  Massing  of  popu- 
lation, moreover,  to  a  degree  hitherto  unknown  in  the  New  World 
and  the  ushering  in  of  a  new  stage  of  industrial  development  were 
producing  in  the  city  so  strategically  situated  at  the  mouth  of  the 
Hudson  new  economic  and  social  tendencies.  Hither  had  come 
from  England  noteworthy  agitators  and  thinkers,  fervid  from  the 
industrial  unrest  there.  A  strong  labor  movement  for  some  years 
had  been  experimenting  in  forms  of  organization  and  formulating 
principles.  A  group  of  young  intellectuals  within  the  Democratic- 
Republican  party,  which  included  WiUiam  Cullen  Bryant,  John 
Bigelow,  Samuel  J.  Tilden,  and,  most  conspicuously,  WilHam 
Leggett  (the  prophet  of  the  Loco-Foco  movement),  was  keenly 
responsive  to  a  philosophy  of  equal  rights;  and  with  these  might 
then  have  been  classed  a  brilliant  independent  editor,  Horace 
Greeley.  The  New  York  Evening  Post,  of  which  Bryant  was 
editor  and  Leggett  associate  editor,  was  the  organ  of  this  group 
and  was  distinctly  sympathetic  with  the  new  movement.  Further- 
more, there  were  still  surviving  men  like  the  Loco-Foco  leader, 
Jaques,  who  reached  back  in  feehng  and  experience  to  the  hallowed 
days  of  the  American  Revolution.  Finally,  all  fixed-income  classes 
in  general — laborers,  professional  men,  holders  of  small  estates — 
were  under  the  economic  pressure  of  a  rapid  rise  in  cost  of  living, 
a  condition  due  chiefly  to  grave  inflation  of  the  currency. 

This  inflation  and  the  prevalent  widening  of  the  credit  system 
were  defended  vigorously  by  the  speculative  members  of  society, 
the  entrepreneurs  of  the  time,  promoters  of  the  new  capitalism, 
whose  philosophy  of  the  new  era  would  not  have  been  difficult  to 
affiliate  with  that  of  the  aggressive  young  planters  of  the  lower 
South.  That  the  social  principles  of  the  two  classes  at  least  were 
not  thought  discordant  appears  from  an  appeal  which  was  made  by 
a  group  of  New  York  merchants  during  the  panic  of  1837,  as  follows: 

Avow  your  belief  that  in  a  great  majority  of  cases  the  possession  of  property 
is  the  proof  of  merit,  because  in  a  country  of  free  laws  and  equal  rights,  prop- 
erty, as  a  general  rule,  cannot  be  acquired  without  industry,  skill  and  economy. 
....  With  a  firm  faith  that  the  many  will  follow  the  wise  and  the  good,  call 
upon  the  men  of  sound  morals,  of  intelligence,  and  industry,  throughout  the 


SOCIAL  PHILOSOPHY  OF  THE  LOCO-FOCO  DEMOCRACY     707 

nation,  to  forget  all  the  distracting  topics  which  have  agitated  it,  and  unite 
in  defense  of  the  institutions,  without  which  commercial  society  cannot  exist. 
....  Appeal  to  our  brethren  of  the  South  for  their  generous  co-operation, 
and  promise  them  that  those  who  beUeve  that  the  possession  of  property  is 
an  evidence  of  merit  will  be  the  last  to  interfere  with  the  rights  of  property 
of  any  kind. 

The  main  sponsors  of  this  manifesto  were  of  Whig  persuasion; 
but  a  large  and  influential  division  of  the  Democratic-Republican 
party  was  inclining  to  the  same  philosophy  and  was  keeping  in 
close  touch  with  such  southern  leaders  as  Rives  of  Virginia  and 
Legare  of  South  Carolina.  Indeed,  there  were  throughout  the 
North,  as  Professor  Dodd  observes  (citing  as  instances  Chancellor 
Kent  and  Daniel  Webster),  numerous  "conservatives"  whose 
social  philosophy  agreed  to  a  considerable  degree  with  that  which 
was  obtaining  in  the  South. 

Between  the  conception  of  society  held  both  by  northern  capi- 
talists and  southern  planters  and  that  advocated  by  themselves, 
the  Loco-Focos  thought  there  existed  a  fundamental,  historic 
antagonism.  Their  perception  of  this  antagonism  was  set  forth  in 
an  address  by  Jaques,  as  follows : 

There  are  two  opinions  abroad  in  the  world  on  the  subject  of  social  relations 
and  the  government  of  men.  The  supporters  of  both  profess  to  have  the  same 
objects  in  view — the  peace,  the  order,  and  the  happiness  of  the  human  race. 
But  as  they  are  founded  on  different  views  of  our  nature  and  the  laws  of  the 
Creator,  both  cannot  be  true.  It  is  therefore  of  the  first  importance  that  the 
question  should  be  speedily  settled  in  the  minds  of  this  community. 

The  theory  of  the  one  party  is,  that  man,  by  reason  of  his  ignorance,  and 
of  his  corrupt  nature,  is  not  capable  of  self-government;  it  is  therefore  neces- 
sary that  he  should  be  restrained  by  force.  They  assert  that  the  Creator  in 
his  providence  has  produced  a  different  order  of  intelligence  among  men,  and 
intended  that  the  most  intelligent  should  be  the  governors  and  rulers,  as  well 
as  the  owners,  and  live  by  the  labor  of  the  other  portion  of  the  human  family. 
Most  of  the  governments  of  the  Old  World  have  been  founded  on  the  above 
theory;  its  effects  are  well  known,  and  need  not  be  here  enumerated. 

The  other  theory  referred  to,  is  that  man  is  a  rational  and  moral  being, 
"that  all  men  are  created  equal,  and  endowed  by  their  Creator  with  certain 
unalienable  rights."  That  by  nature  he  is  also  a  social  being,  and  that  on 
entering  society  he  does  not  give  up  any  of  his  natural  rights,  but  to  secure 
those  rights  in  their  fullest  enjoyment  "governments  are  instituted  among 


7o8  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

The  governments  of  these  United  States  were  founded  on  the  latter  theory, 
and  it  is  now  to  be  proved  by  after-experience  whether  it  is  capable  of  being 
carried  out  in  practice. 

That  there  was  a  very  real  danger  of  American  democracy  being 
diverted  from  its  true  course,  the  Loco-Focos  believed;  and  so  they 
fought  bitterly  (and  at  times  irrationally)  the  money-power  and 
the  conservatism  of  their  time  and  engaged  zealously  in  the  formu- 
lation and  propagation  of  a  social  philosophy  which  they  counted  of 
incalculable  worth  to  humanity. 

The  chief  significance  of  Loco-Focoism,  consequently,  is  not 
derived  from  its  manifestation  as  a  political  party  in  New  York, 
but  from  the  spread  of  its  tenets.  Its  conception  of  democracy, 
its  social  and  political  formulations,  its  spirit  of  aggressive  radicalism 
became  ascendant  between  1837  and  1844  in  the  national  Demo- 
cratic party;  and,  furthermore,  after  the  seizure  of  the  leadership 
of  the  national  party  by  the  southern  expansionists  in  1844,  the 
process  of  permeating  the  Democracy  of  the  North  with  Loco- 
Foco  doctrines  continued  well  up  to  the  outbreak  of  the  Civil  War. 
By  this  assertion,  however,  it  is  not  meant  that  the  teachings  of 
the  Loco-Focos  were  the  only  source  of  radical  democracy  during 
this  period;  for,  prior  to  and  contemporaneously  with  the  Loco- 
Foco  agitation,  a  large  section  of  the  Democratic  Party  (of  which 
Senator  Benton  of  Missouri  was  a  representative  leader)  was  devel- 
oping similar  views.  The  original  Loco-Focos,  in  fact,  may  quite 
properly  be  regarded  as  constituting  merely  a  militant  vanguard  of 
the  general  body  of  the  progressive  Democracy.  Nevertheless,  it 
is  not  too  much  to  say  that  the  congeries  of  principles  which  came  to 
be  known  under  their  name — especially  that  of  unquahfied  belief 
in  the  philosophy  of  human  equality — became  ingrained  in  large 
portions  of  the  northern  populace  and  thus  contributed  an  impor- 
tant element  to  the  idealistic  democratic  movement  which  finally 
by  armed  force  confounded  the  southern  votaries  of  aristocracy. 
Another  contribution  to  the  advance  of  world  democracy,  perhaps  of 
equal  permanent  worth,  was  due  to  the  fact  that  Loco-Foco 
radicalism  furnished  important  and  lasting  ingredients  to  the  great 
process  of  remodehng  state  constitutions  which  went  on  in  the 
United  States  in  the  two  decades  prior  to  the  Civil  War.     During 


SOCIAL  PHILOSOPHY  OF  THE  LOCO-FOCO  DEMOCRACY     709 

this  period  the  constitutions  of  practically  all  of  the  older  states 
were  recast,  and  those  of  ten  new  ones  were  framed. 

We  have  here  space  for  no  more  than  the  barest  outHne  of  the 
historical  steps  by  which  the  doctrines  of  the  earlier  Loco-Focos 
were  diffused  through  the  Democracy  of  the  North.'  So  early  as 
the  national  campaign  of  1836,  Professor  Woodburn  tells  us,  their 
Declaration  of  Principles  was  widely  used  by  the  general  Democracy 
as  a  party  platform.  Then,  through  a  succession  of  events  in 
1837  President  Van  Buren  was  compelled  to  choose  between  the 
conservative  and  radical  elements  in  his  political  following,  and 
decisively  chose  the  latter.  He  and  his  associates,  thereupon,  estab- 
lished at  Washington  a  high-class  magazine,  the  Democratic 
Review  (the  first  issue  appearing  in  October,  1837),  which  became 
an  effective  vehicle  for  the  dissemination  of  the  larger  Loco-Foco- 
ism.  In  line  with  its  teachings  was  the  Democratic  platform  of 
1840  which,  as  Professor  Dodd  has  noted,  was  the  last  ante-bellum 
pronouncement  of  the  national  Democracy  to  endorse  the  Declara- 
tion of  Independence.  Meanwhile,  a  majority  of  the  pohtical  group 
in  New  York  known  as  the  Regency,  adhering  to  the  leadership  of 
the  President,  was  forming  the  celebrated  Barnburner  faction 
(essentially  a  radical  movement) ,  and  this  in  turn  became  an  impor- 
tant nucleus  eventually  of  the  Free  Soil  party.  Throughout  the 
period  following  1837,  indeed,  northern  Democrats  in  general — 
and  more  specifically  the  numerous  continent  of  radicals — were 
widely  known  under  the  appellation  of  Loco-Focos. 

The  conceptions  of  society,  thus  widely  disseminated  under  the 
name  of  Loco-Focoism,  were  not  new.  The  original  Loco-Focos 
themselves,  indeed,  did  not  claim  to  be  initiating  a  new  philosophy, 
but  held  that  their  mission  was  "to  bring  back  the  Democratic 
party  to  the  principles  upon  which  it  was  originally  founded, 
....  those  heaven-born  principles  which  had  been  so  long  trodden 
under  foot  of  Monopoly."  The  doctrines  of  the  earlier  much- 
maligned  partisans,  the  Democratic  Review  averred,  were  essentially 
those  of  Jefferson,  Taylor,  and  Madison.  But,  in  reviving  and  re- 
emphasizing  the  ancient  maxims  of  democracy,  these  humble  men 

'A  history  of  the  movement,  with  references  and  bibliographical  data,  is  in  the 
American  Historical  Review  for  April,  1919,  under  the  title,  "Diverging  Tendencies  in 
New  York  Democracy  in  the  Period  of  the  Loco-Focos." 


7IO  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

insisted  that  they  were  basing  their  contentions  upon  eternal 
principles,  and  they  regarded  themselves  as  "political  apostles  of 
the  future";  and,  indeed,  the  fact  that  the  party  arose  in  the  midst 
of  a  new  industriaHsm,  that  many  of  the  reforms  which  it  advocated 
were  distinctly  modern,  and  that  its  envisagement  of  life  was  char- 
acteristically more  that  of  the  mass-action  of  cities  than  that  of  the 
individualism  of  the  frontier  gives  to  its  philosophy  of  society  added 
pregnancy.  Its  philosophy,  in  truth,  was  that  of  a  nascent  pro- 
letarianism. 

The  dominating  and  ever  present  idea  in  the  creed  of  all  Loco- 
Focos,  whether  of  the  earher  zealots  in  New  York  or  of  the  later 
proponents  upon  the  western  prairies,  was  that  of  equal  rights. 
On  this  idea  depended  their  whole  social  and  political  philosophy; 
from  it  proceeded  in  some  measure  all  of  their  demands  for  reform. 
While  they  repudiated  the  teachings  of  communism,  they  asked 
"that  the  blessings  of  government,  like  the  dews  of  heaven,  should 
descend  equally  on  the  high  and  the  low,  the  rich  and  the  poor." 
They  conceived  the  state,  therefore,  not  as  an  aggregation  of  social 
strata,  the  lower  bound  down  by  the  upper;  but  as  an  organization 
of  voluntary  units,  no  one  more  entitled  to  preference  than  another 
— provided  each  functioned  usefully.  Upon  the  latter  proviso, 
however,  they  were  disposed  to  insist  and  to  resent,  therefore,  the 
presence  in  the  body  politic  of  those  who  in  any  manner  (but  espe- 
cially through  the  manifold  devices  of  "paper  capitalism")  sub- 
sisted or  preyed  upon  their  fellowmen.  Aristocracy  they  considered 
as  economically  parasitic,  and  they  certainly  regarded  those  only 
as  good  citizens  who  were  somehow  "producers,"  a  contention  for 
which  they  were  bitterly  reproached  as  stirrers  up  of  class  hatred. 
But,  in  the  judgment  of  the  Loco-Focos,  the  strength,  the  purity, 
the  excellence  of  government  depended  in  the  last  analysis  upon 
equahty  of  opportunity,  limited  only  by  natural  endowment; 
equal  participation  of  citizens  in  the  affairs  and  benefits  of  govern- 
ment; and  impartial  appUcation  of  laws  which  themselves  should 
be  conformable  to  the  eternal  principles  of  justice.  Loco-Focoism, 
in  fine,  held  with  almost  fanatical  fervor  the  ultimate  postulate  of 
democracy — the  largest  chance  for  the  self-realization  of  every 
individual  consistent  with  like  chances  for  all  other  individuals. 


SOCIAL  PHILOSOPHY  OF  THE  LOCO-FOCO  DEMOCRACY    711 

The  Loco-Focos,  accordingly,  were  strongly  opposed  to  what 
they  conceived  to  be  the  exactions  and  pretensions  of  the  aristoc- 
racy. This  opposition  was  caustically  set  forth  in  one  of  their 
Reports  as  follows: 

The  world  has  ahvays  abounded  with  men,  who,  rather  than  toil  to  produce 
the  wealth  necessary  to  their  subsistence,  have  contrived  to  strip  others  of  the 
fruits  of  their  labor,  either  by  violence  and  bloodshed,  or  by  swaggering  pre- 
tensions to  exclusive  privileges. 

It  is,  however,  chiefly  by  the  latter  mode  of  robbery,  that  the  working 
classes  of  modern  times  are  kept  in  debasement  and  poverty.  Aristocrats 
have  discovered  that  charters  are  safer  weapons  than  swords;  and  that  cant, 
falsehood,  and  hj'pocrisy  serve  all  the  purposes  of  a  highwayman's  pistol, 
while  they  leave  their  victims  alive  and  fit  for  future  exactions. 

Naturally,  therefore,  the  Loco-Focos  abhorred  all  manner  of 
monopoly  and  of  special  privilege  and  strongly  questioned  vested 
rights.  The  latter  generally  were  to  be  traced,  they  thought,  to 
the  brutal  coercion  of  the  common  people  in  feudal  times  and  to 
belated  laws  which  preserved  the  inequalities  of  those  times. 
Charters  in  perpetuity,  in  particular,  were  most  earnestly  denounced 
as  a  form  of  injustice  which,  in  violation  of  democratic  principles 
and  the  rights  of  the  people,  were  designed  to  nourish  a  privileged 
class.  There  was  to  be  nowhere,  in  the  Loco-Foco  scheme  of 
things,  opportunity  for  vesting  privileges  in  the  few,  and  thereby 
divesting  the  many  of  their  rights  for  generations  to  come.  The 
Loco-Focos  felt  that  they  were  fighting  in  this  matter  a  danger 
which  placed  in  acute  jeopardy  their  ideals  for  the  progress  of 
civilization. 

The  doctrines  and  activities  of  the  Loco-Focos  were  not  only 
opposed  by  those  whose  interests  were  assailed,  but  naturally,  were 
viewed  with  horror  by  many  of  the  good  and  staid  people  of  the 
time.  The  Loco-Foco  philosophy,  it  was  averred,  set  class  against 
class  and  not  only  threatened  the  stability  of  society,  but  tended 
to  overthrow  all  society.  These  agitators  were  called  disorganizers, 
visionaries,  agrarians,  labor  unionists,  infidels,  or  worse.  If  the 
governor  of  New  York,  William  L.  Marcy,  for  instance,  would 
apply  such  a  term  as  knave  to  William  Leggett,  one  of  the  most 
sincere  and  brilliant  apostles  of  democracy  that  America  has 
ever  known,  it  is  not  to  be  wondered  at  that  other  men  of  the  period 


712  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

likened  the  spread  of  Loco-Focoism  to  the  devastation  which  had 
been  wrought  by  the  great  fire  in  New  York  or  to  the  awfuhiess  of 
the  epidemic  of  cholera. 

It  is  true  that  the  Loco-Foco  ideas  were  in  some  respects  extreme 
and  needed  the  correctives  of  moderation.  Constructive  reform 
would  have  been  hindered  by  the  theory  that  laws  have  only  the 
function  of  keeping  men  from  injuring  each  other,  and  by  insistence 
that  in  no  respect  has  a  legislative  body  the  right  to  bind  its 
successors.  The  proposal,  likewise,  that  debts  should  be  merely 
debts  of  honor  and  not  legally  enforceable,  while  it  contributed  to 
the  adoption  of  exemption  laws,  nevertheless  was  unrealizable. 
Hatred  of  speculation  and  of  "paper  capitalism"  extended  to  a 
demand  for  banning  all  paper  money,  a  contention  which  would 
have  hindered  legitimate  functions  of  credit;  and  the  formidable 
and  persistent  attempts  absolutely  to  do  away  with  banks  neces- 
sarily were  moderated  everjrwhere  by  the  good  sense  of  the  people. 

The  Loco-Foco  program  of  reform,  on  the  other  hand,  embraced 
sound  features.  The  determined  opposition  to  banks  and  to  special 
acts  of  incorporation  met  real  evils  of  corruption  and  tended  to 
restrain  undue  aggrandizement  of  the  "money  power. "  Imprison- 
ment for  debt  was  opposed,  and  lien  laws  and  the  right  of  laborers 
to  organize  unions  were  upheld.  Land  laws  in  the  interest  of  the 
people  were  advocated,  and  "a  more  extended,  equal,  and  con- 
venient system  of  pubhc  school  instruction"  was  urged.  Popular 
election  of  judges  was  long  agitated,  and  a  system  of  reformed 
primaries  was  actually  put  into  operation  by  the  party  in  New 
York  City  as  early  as  1836. 

The  penology  which  appears  in  the  Model  Constitution  of  the 
New  York  Loco-Focos  is  especially  suggestive.  "There  shall  be 
no  capital  punishment, "  one  clause  declared,  "but  in  all  convictions 
for  murder  or  unjustifiable  homicide,  the  sentence  shaU  be  banish- 
ment or  imprisonment  at  hard  labor  for  hfe;  the  net  profits  of 
said  labor  to  be  given  to  the  dependents  and  relations  of  the  person 
murdered,  or  to  the  poor,  as  the  jury  shall  direct. "  The  principle 
of  restitution  to  the  injured  was  to  be  applied  also  in  the  use  of 
proceeds  from  the  labor  of  persons  convicted  of  felonies,  and  this 
principle  was  very  wide-reaching  since  embezzlement  and  breaches 


SOCIAL  PHILOSOPHY  OF  THE  LOCO-FOCO  DEMOCRACY    713 

of  trust  were  to  "be  indictable  as  frauds  and  all  frauds  shall  be 
punishable  as  felonies" — the  Loco-Focos  thinking,  seemingly,  that 
the  principles  of  equality  extended  even  to  sentences  for  criminality. 
Moreover,  "all  articles  manufactured  in  the  prisons  of  this  state, 
over  and  above  the  purposes  of  restitution,  shall  be  appropriated 
to  the  use  of  the  poor  in  such  manner  as  the  legislature  shall 
direct, "  and  the  rising  competition  of  prison  labor  with  workingmen 
was  met  by  the  proviso  that,  "the  time  or  labor  convicts  shall  not 
be  bargained  to  contractors,  or  to  any  person  whatsoever. " 

Since  the  social  philosophy  of  the  early  Loco-Focos  thus 
embraced  a  penology  tender  of  the  interests  of  workingmen  and 
reflected  in  general  a  broad  humanitarianism,  it  is  the  more  strange 
that  it  took  no  cognizance  of  negro  slavery.  Perhaps  its  advocates 
felt  themselves,  as  one  of  their  Reports  states,  victims  of  the 
"slavery  of  poverty,"  and  were  more  concerned  about  avoiding 
the  servile  condition  to  which  the  southern  philosophy  would  have 
consigned  them  than  in  agitating  the  wrongs  of  fairly  comfortable 
negroes.  Perhaps  also  the  Loco-Foco  attitude  merely  reflected 
the  preoccupation  of  the  average  citizen  in  his  own  affairs.  As 
Loco-Focoism  spread  over  the  country,  moreover,  the  growing 
opposition  of  its  adherents  to  the  claims  of  the  southern  oligarchy 
seems  not  to  have  been  directed  so  much  against  the  institution  of 
slavery  per  se  as  animated  by  a  developing  consciousness  of  the 
final  irreconcilability  of  the  two  conflicting  theories  of  society  and 
of  the  systems  of  labor  based  thereon;  a  consciousness  ripening 
eventually  into  a  determination  that  the  republic  with  all  that  it 
meant  for  democracy  was  not  to  be  dominated  or  ruined  by  the 
slave  power. 

There  was  always  present  in  Loco-Focoism,  however,  the  impul- 
sion of  a  humanitarian  ideal  which  ultimately  comprehends  all 
races,  classes,  and  conditions  of  men.  "For,"  as  this  ideal  was 
strikingly  expressed  by  the  Democratic  Review  in  1837: 

Democracy  is  the  cause  of  Humanity.  It  has  faith  in  human  nature.  It 
believes  in  its  essential  equality  and  fundamental  goodness.  It  respects, 
■with  a  solemn  reverence  to  which  the  proudest  artificial  institutions  and  dis- 
tinctions of  society  have  no  claim,  the  human  soul.  It  is  the  cause  of  philan- 
thropy. Its  object  is  to  emancipate  the  mind  of  the  mass  of  men  from  the 
degrading  and  disheartening  fetters  of  social  distinctions  and  advantages; 


714  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

to  bid  it  walk  abroad  through  the  free  creation  "in  its  own  majesty";  to  war 
against  all  fraud,  oppression  and  violence;  by  striking  at  their  root  to  reform 
all  the  infinitely  varied  human  misery  which  has  grown  out  of  the  old  and  false 
ideas  by  which  the  world  has  been  so  long  misgoverned;  to  dismiss  the  hireling 
soldier;  to  spike  the  cannon  and  bury  the  bayonet;  to  burn  the  gibbet  and  open 
the  debtor's  dungeon;  to  substitute  harmony  and  mutual  respect  for  the 
jealousies  and  discord  now  subsisting  between  the  different  classes  of  society 

as  the  consequence  of  their  artificial  classification It  is  essentially 

involved  in  Christianity,  of  which  it  has  been  well  said  that  its  pervading  spirit 
of  democratic  equaUty  is  its  highest  fact. 

The  countless  ages  of  the  future,  the  Review  affirmed,  are  "com- 
mitted with  the  cause  of  American  Democracy.  " 

The  idealism  of  the  Loco-Focos,  and  particularly  of  the  earher 
partisans,  was  consciously  drawn  from  two  great  historic  sources. 
The  one  was  the  teachings  of  Christianity.  Perhaps  their  frequent 
allusions  to  the  example  and  words  of  the  Carpenter  of  Nazareth 
may  have  been  induced  in  part  by  anxiety  to  meet  the  charge  of 
being  infidels  and  atheists;  but  there  is  no  doubt  that  the  use  of 
these  by  some  of  the  leaders  was  due  to  genuine  piety.  The 
historian  of  the  party,  Byrdsall,  calls  his  co -laborers  the  "Metho- 
dists of  democracy  "  and  constantly  seeks  to  set  forth  the  movement 
as  in  consonance  with  "Christian  democracy. " 

In  the  second  place,  not  only  the  idealism  of  the  Loco-Focos, 
but,  in  fact,  their  philosophy  as  a  whole,  was  thoroughly  impreg- 
nated with  the  doctrines  of  the  compact  theory  of  society,  that 
group  of  ideas  which  has  been  so  omnipresent  and  so  powerful  in 
the  logic  of  revolutions.  Practically  all  of  their  various  reports, 
addresses,  and  declarations  include  references  to  this  theory  as 
fundamental.  The  immutabihty  of  the  laws  of  nature  and  the 
irrevocability  of  natural  rights  were  affirmed  over  and  over  again. 
How  directly  Loco-Foco  behefs  were  derived  from  this  source  is 
shown  in  the  first  article  of  the  "Proposed  Constitution"  which 
read  as  follows: 

ARTICLE  I.    NATURAL  RIGHTS 

I.  We,  the  people  of  the  State  of  New  York,  in  order  to  mutually  secure 
to  each  other  the  peaceful  enjoyment  of  our  natural  rights,  and  the  equal 
participation  of  the  advantages  of  society,  do  hereby  establish  the  following 
Constitution,  as  our  social  compact  and  system  of  government. 


SOCIAL  PHILOSOPHY  OF  THE  LOCO-FOCO  DEMOCRACY    715 

2.  All  men  are  created  equally  free,  and  are  equally  entitled  to  the  exercise 
of  their  natural  rights.  On  entering  into  society,  man  gives  up  none  of  those 
rights;  he  only  adopts  certain  modes  of  securing  the  peaceful  enjoyment  of 
them. 

Man's  natural  rights  of  person  are,  his  right  to  e.xist,  and  to  enjoy  his 
existence;  and  the  right  to  exercise  those  physical  and  mental  faculties  with 
which  nature  has  endowed  him.  Man's  natural  rights  in  relation  to  things 
are,  his  right  to  the  things  produced  by  the  exercise  of  his  personal  endowments, 
and  his  right  to  participate  in  those  bounties  which  nature  has  equally  given  to 
aU.  Right,  as  related  to  action,  is  that  principle  of  equality  which  teaches  man 
to  do  to  others  as  he  would  that  others  should  do  to  him.  Those  acts  are 
naturally,  politically,  and  morally  right,  which  may  be  done  by  aU  without 
injury  to  any. 

To  readers  of  the  article  referred  to  in  our  opening  paragraph, 
it  will  be  apparent  from  this  brief  survey  that  the  Loco-Foco 
philosophy  which  in  the  two  decades  preceding  the  Civil  War  had 
wide  influence  in  the  North  was  the  antithesis  of  that  which  con- 
temporaneously came  to  command  adherence  in  the  South. 


THE  COMPARATIVE  ROLE  OF  THE   GROUP   CONCEPT 
IN  WARD'S  DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY  AND  CONTEM- 
PORARY AMERICAN  SOCIOLOGY' 


WALTER  B.  BODENHAFER 

Washington  University 


IV.      SIGNIFICANCE  OF  THE  GROUP  CONCEPT 

The  object  of  this  chapter  is  to  sum  up  the  contrasts  that  have 
emerged  from  the  two  preceding  chapters,  and  to  attempt  to  sug- 
gest the  significance  of  the  group  concept  and  its  implications  for 
social  sciences  and  for  social  control.  In  general,  it  may  be  said 
that  contemporary  sociology  shows  a  striking  difference  from 
Ward  in  its  use  of  the  group  concept.  The  shift  that  appears  is 
not  always  so  much  a  matter  of  terminology  as  a  change  in  point 
of  view.  Even  in  the  matter  of  terminology,  however,  a  review 
of  the  writers  mentioned  shows  an  increasing  use  of  the  group 
concept,  as  such,  as  one  of  the  fundamental  tools  of  analysis  of 
the  problems  with  which  they  deal.  The  difference  in  point  of 
view,  even  where  the  concept  as  such  is  not  expressly  stressed,  is 
still  more  noticeable.  The  summaries  in  the  preceding  chapters 
show  this  shift  very  clearly  in  their  development  of  the  analysis 
of  such  problems  as  the  origin  of  society,  of  language,  of  religion, 
of  the  origin  and  nature  of  the  mind,  the  relation  of  the  individual 
to  the  group  or  to  society  or  the  state,  and  the  nature  and  meaning 
of  the  group  or  social  process.  In  the  treatment  of  all  these  prob- 
lems the  conscious  effort  of  contemporary  sociology  is  to  approach 
them  from  the  group  standpoint.  The  contrast  might  be  referred 
to  as  that  between  pioneer  social  science,  without  a  social  psy- 
chology, and  a  later  social  science  with  a  more  or  less  adequate 
social  psychology.  The  sociology  of  the  present  time  is  a  sociology 
whose  viewpoint  and  method  have  been  considerably  modified 
by  a  psychology  in  which  the  group  plays  a  fundamental  and  in 
some  respects  a  primary  part.     We  may  make  the  difference  in 

'Copyright,  192 1,  by  the  University  of  Chicago  Press. 

716 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  ''DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"     717 

point  of  view  more  concrete  by  calling  attention  to  the  widespread 
influence  of  Baldwin's  thinking  as  expressed  in  his  Social  and 
Ethical  Interpretations,  and  his  subsequent  development  of  the 
same  fundamental  thought  of  the  oneness  of  the  individual  and 
the  group.  The  frequent  references  to  his  stimulating  influence 
are  one  of  the  evidences  of  the  effort  on  the  part  of  contemporary- 
sociology  to  profit  by  the  newly  created  technique,  social  psychology. 
The  contrast,  of  course,  is  not  an  absolute  one  but  one  of  degree. 
Ward,  particularly  in  his  Applied  Sociology,  was  attempting  to 
found  a  social  psychology  which  foreshadowed  the  coming  of  a 
more  adequate  sociological  point  of  view;  but  it  still  was  only  a 
foreshadowing,  and  it  was  not  at  all  apparent  in  his  first  great 
work,  with  which  we  are  particularly  concerned.  As  was  pointed 
out  in  chapter  ii.  Ward  approached  his  problems  almost  exclu- 
sively from  the  standpoint  of  the  individual,  while  the  group  was 
only  incidental.  Contemporary  sociology  reverses  the  process, 
starting  with  the  group  as  the  fundamental  unit  and  developing 
its  individuals  as  a  part  of  the  social  or  group  process.  It  should 
be  pointed  out,  however,  that  while  the  latter  stresses  the  group 
in  its  analysis,  it  does  not  consciously  eliminate  or  subordinate 
the  individual  as  did  Plato  and  his  more  modern  followers  in 
Germany.  One  of  the  general  characteristics  of  the  writers  whose 
works  have  been  reviewed  is,  that  they  recognize  the  worth  and 
value  of  the  individual.  EarHer  writers  approached  their  prob- 
lems from  the  premise  of  the  individual  versus  the  group.  Con- 
temporary sociology  attempts  to  set  out  by  removing  the  disjunc- 
tive particle  between  the  individual  and  the  group  and  to  hold 
consistently  to  the  view  that  the  individual  and  the  group  are 
different  aspects  of  the  same  total  group  situation. 

It  should  also  be  pointed  out  that  contemporary  sociology,  in 
its  emphasis  on  the  group,  does  not  revert  to  the  metaphysical 
theory  of  Hegel  with  his  imperial  state.  The  group,  in  the  thought 
of  the  writers  we  have  dealt  with,  is  a  very  real  thing.  It  is  a  matter 
of  actual  give  and  take  of  everyday  life.  There  is  no  attempt  to 
find  in  it  a  mystical  social  mind  which  exists  apart  from  the  actual 
persons  and  institutions  and  objects  that  make  up  the  tangible 
situation.     It  is  not  an  attempt  to  impose  upon  a  social  situation 


7i8  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

the  categories  of  an  older  introspective  psychology.  What  the 
contemporary  writers  seem  to  refer  to  and  have  in  mind  when 
they  deal  with  the  group  is  a  total  social  situation  in  which  the 
action  of  one  form  stimulates  and  responds  to  the  action  of  another 
form;  it  is  interaction  among  persons.  Contemporary  sociology 
tends  to  be  pragmatic  rather  than  metaphysical. 

The  difference,  which  we  have  tried  to  point  out,  between  the 
two  periods,  can  be  no  better  expressed  than  to  quote  from  Baldwin : 

All  our  thought  has  led  us  to  see  that  one  of  the  historical  conceptions  of 
man  is,  in  its  social  aspects,  mistaken.  Man  is  not  a  person  who  stands  up  in 
his  isolated  majesty,  meanness,  passion,  or  humility,  and  sees,  hits,  worships, 
fights,  or  overcomes,  another  man,  who  does  the  opposite  things  to  him,  each 
preserving  his  isolated  majesty,  meanness,  passion,  humility,  all  the  while, 
so  that  he  can  be  considered  a  "unit"  for  the  compounding  processes  of  social 
speculation.  On  the  contrary,  a  man  is  a  social  outcome  rather  than  a  social  unit. 
He  is  always,  in  his  greatest  part,  also  some  one  else.  Social  acts  of  his — that 
is,  acts  which  may  not  prove  antisocial — are  his  because  they  are  society's  first; 
otherwise  he  could  not  have  learned  them  or  have  had  any  tendency  to  do  them. 
Everything  that  he  learns  is  copied,  reproduced,  assimilated,  from  his  fellows; 
and  what  all  of  them,  including  him— all  the  social  fellows — do  and  think, 
they  do  and  think  because  they  have  each  been  through  the  same  course  of 
copying,  reproducing,  assimilating,  that  he  has.  WTien  he  acts  quite  privately, 
it  is  always  with  a  boomerang  in  his  hand ;  and  every  use  he  makes  of  his  weapon 
leaves  its  indelible  impression  both  upon  the  other  and  upon  him.' 

It  is  this  conception  which  has  become  the  conscious  point  of  view 
of  contemporary  sociology.  It  expresses  the  contrast  between  the 
view  of  Ward  with  its  individualistic  bent,  and  contemporary 
thought  with  its  emphasis  on  the  group.  The  importance  of  this 
change  in  point  of  view  is  suggested  in  the  continuation  of  the 
quotation  from  Baldwin. 

It  is  on  such  truths  as  these,  which  recent  writers^  have  been  bringing  to 
light,  that  the  philosophy  of  society  must  be  gradually  built  up.  Only  the 
neglect  of  such  facts  can  account  for  the  present  state  of  social  discussion. 
Once  let  it  be  our  philosophical  conviction,  drawn  from  the  more  general  results 
of  psychology  and  anthropology,  that  man  is  not  two,  an  ego  and  an  alter, 
each  of  which  is  active  and  chronic  protest  against  a  third  great  thing,  society; 
once  dispel  this  hideous  unfact,  and  with  it  the  remedies  found  by  the  ego- 
ists— back  all  the  way  from  modern  individualists  to  Hobbes, — and  I  submit 
the  main  barrier  to  the  successful  understanding  of  society  is  removed.^ 

'Social  and  Ethical  Interpretations,  pp.  96-97. 

'  Stephen,  Alexander,  Hoffdmg,  Tarde.        ^ Social  and  Ethical  Interpretations,  p.  97. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"     719 

Ward  produced  his  sociology  before  this  transition  had  taken  place. 
The  contrast  between  him  and  contemporary  sociology,  in  general, 
is  expressed  in  the  words  just  quoted  from  Baldwin. 

Starting  with  the  group  as  a  point  of  departure,  contemporary 
sociology  not  only  dissolves  the  older  individualistic  attitude  but 
adopts  the  fundamental  notion  that  the  mind  of  the  individual  is 
a  social  product.  Stated  in  other  terms,  the  self  is  a  social  self,  a 
creation,  rather  than  a  datum,  which  is  but  another  way  of  stat- 
ing that  the  individual  and  the  group  are  different  aspects  of  a 
group  or  social  situation.  The  importance  of  this  change  in  the 
field  of  practical  efforts  toward  social  control  will  appear  later. 
Back  of  the  self,  as  a  biologically  inherited  group  of  tendencies  lie 
the  instincts,  the  raw  materials  out  of  which  the  group  builds  a 
social  personality.  Such  in  very  brief  terms  is  the  prevailing  trend 
of  thought  in  contemporary  sociology. 

The  characterization  of  contemporary  sociology,  which  has  just 
been  sketched  in  general  terms,  must  be  qualified  to  some  extent. 
It  is  a  description  of  tendencies  and  trends  as  well  as  realized  ends. 
The  transition  that  has  been  suggested  is  one  that  is  not  complete 
in  its  details  nor  clearly  recognized  in  its  implications.  More 
work  remains  to  be  done  before  the  newer  view  becomes  uniformly 
clear.  As  was  pointed  out  in  the  various  separate  reviews  of  some 
of  the  writers,  there  is  still  some  confusion  of  tongues.  Not  all  of 
the  writers  of  sociology  have  held  consistently  to  the  views  which 
they  consciously  adopt.  This  results  from  two  different  facts, 
first,  the  inadequate  grasp  of  the  position  to  which  they  consciously 
adhere,  and  secondly,  the  difficulty  of  adapting  words  of  an  older 
psychology  to  a  new  point  of  view.  The  second  is  one  of  the  most 
difficult  barriers  to  understanding  among  sociological  writers. 
Such  concepts  as  "individual,"  "group,"  "society,"  "mind," 
"psychic,"  "instinct,"  "social,"  "thought,"  are  freighted  with 
meanings  that  tend  to  obscure  views  rather  than  clarify  them. 
As  Small  has  pointed  out,  one  of  the  pressing  needs  of  contem- 
porary sociology  is  the  clarification  and  definition  of  the  categories 
which  it  uses.  The  lack  of  this,  and  the  inherent  difficulty  of  the 
use  of  abstract  terms  create  some  of  the  apparent  and  perhaps  real 
inadequacies  of  some  of  the  uses  of  the  group  concept  which  we 
have  mentioned. 


720  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

Aside  from  matters  of  terminological  confusion,  however,  there 
do  exist  noticeable  lacunae  in  efforts  of  various  contemporary 
sociologists  to  apply  the  group  concept  to  the  particular  problems 
with  which  we  find  them  dealing.     We  found,  for  example,  fre- 
quent  reversions   to   older  individualistic   preconceptions   which 
occasionally  appeared  as  real  or  apparent  contradictions  of  the 
consciously  proclaimed  point  of  view.     Such  conceptions  appear 
most  frequently  in  the  shape  of  apparent  conceptions  of  the  indi- 
vidual as  a  thing  given  rather  than  created,  in  the  conception  of 
the  mind  as  an  essence  rather  than  as  a  function,  as  a  thing  in 
itself  rather  than  as  a  type  of  behavior  that  appears  in  peculiar 
conflict  situations.     The  separation  of  the  mental  from  the  physi- 
cal, of  the  inner  from  the  outer,  of  the  individual  from  the  group, 
which  appear  again  and  again  in  the  literature,  are  evidences  that 
the  shift  to  the  new  point  of  view  has  not  yet  been  complete.     In 
most  cases,  these  lapses  are  due  to  reversion  to  older  complexes 
in  periods  of  unconscious  activity.     In  some  cases  they  are  con- 
sciously asserted  but  with  a  qualification  which  attempts  to  relieve 
them  from  the  taint  of  earlier  psychology  and  metaphysics  with 
their  essences  and  existences.     These  lapses,  however,  are  not  of 
primary  importance  for  our  purpose.     They  bear  witness,  rather, 
as  occasional  variations  which  serve  to  bring  out  in  more  relief 
the  underlying  thought  which  seems  to  run  through  all  the  writings, 
namely,  that  the  group  is  fundamental  and  that  sociology  finds  its 
justification  in  attempting  the  study  of  the  social  process  from 
this  point  of  view.      The  point  of  view  is  not  Iways  expressed  in 
the  same  terms;  it  may  be  in  terms  of  association,  of  interaction, 
of  mental  unity,  of  social  mind,  of  group  behavior,  of  social  process, 
or  of  group  process.     These  categories,  as  well  as  the  methods  of 
procedure  may  vary,   but  the  constant  feature  is   the  thought 
involved  in  what  we  have  called  the  group  concept.     Small  has 
suggested  the  same  thought  in  a  little  different  connection.     Speak- 
ing of  the  distinctive  technique  of  the  sociologist,  he  says: 

The  technique  accordingly  involves,  second,  a  body  of  procedure.  This 
varies  in  accordance  with  the  particular  character  of  the  problem  undertaken, 
from  the  most  abstract  dealing  with  questions  of  epistemology  and  methodology 
to  the  most  concrete  questions  of  juvenile  courts  or  milk  supply.     The  generic 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"     721 

factor  in  common,  from  one  end  of  this  scale  to  the  other,  is  reference  of  the 
problem  to  its  group  attachments,  instead  of  treating  it  as  something  isolated 
from  the  human  process  as  a  whole.' 

It  is  this  common  attempt  to  approach  problems  from  the  group 
standpoint  that  stands  out  as  one  of  the  characteristic  features  of 
contemporary  sociology,  in  spite  of  its  frequent  reversions  to  older 
terms  and  conceptions.  It  is  this  view  which  contrasts  with  the 
opposite  emphasis  shown  in  Ward. 

Before  leaving  this  part  of  the  discussion,  it  should  be  noted  that 
the  most  striking  and  universal  lack  in  contemporary  sociology's 
effort  to  establish  itself  on  this  general  group  conception  is  the 
absence  of  an  adequate  procedure  to  explain  the  essential  features 
of  a  social  process.  No  one  of  the  sociologists  has  yet  elaborated 
a  concrete  process  by  which  the  essence  of  the  group  behavior  can 
be  interpreted.  Not  only  is  there  a  lack  of  such  a  process  found 
in  the  works  of  contemporary  sociology,  but  in  some  cases  the  con- 
sciousness of  the  need  is  not  adequately  recognized.  In  a  measure, 
this  part  of  the  work  may  properly  fall  to  the  field  of  the  psycholo- 
gists, and  social  psychologists,  but  the  gap  remains  essentially 
unfilled  for  sociology.  Baldwin's  imitation  mechanism  has  not 
been  accepted,  generally,  among  the  sociologists  as  an  adequate 
or  complete  account  of  the  social  process  by  which  the  self  and 
all  its  implications  of  language,  habits,  and  thought  are  to  be 
accounted  for.^  Until  provided  with  an  acceptable  hypothesis, 
furnished  by  psychologists,  or  by  sociologists  themselves,  the 
analysis  of  group  behavior  must  remain  inadequate  and  must  deal 
largely  with  results  based  upon  assumptions  rather  than  upon 
explanations  of  a  process.^ 

^Encyclopaedia  Americana,  article  on  "Sociology,"  19 19. 

'  Most  sociologists,  while  accepting  the  thesis  of  Baldwin  as  to  the  fudamental 
unity  of  the  individual  and  the  group,  reject  his  undue  emphasis  on  imitation  as  the 
process  whereby  his  results  were  obtained.  None  of  the  criticisms,  however,  seems 
to  be  adequate  or  to  offer  a  satisfactory-  supplemental  process.  Outside  of  the  sociolo- 
gists, the  only  adequate  criticism  of  the  imitation  theory  and  satisfactory  elucidation 
of  the  process  of  interaction  is  that  furnished  by  Professor  Mead  of  the  University  of 
Chicago. 

J  Around  this  point  revolves  the  current  revival  of  the  mechanistic  conception 
of  behavior  which  is  finding  increased  vogue  among  certain  writers.  The  reaction 
from  the  futilities  of  metaphysics  and  from  the  introspective  psychologies  is  variously 


722  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

The  change  in  thought  which  has  taken  place  since  the  time 
of  Ward's  first  book  has  been  characterized  as  a  transition  from 
an  atomizing  process  to  a  synoptic  method  of  thought.  Concern- 
ing this  transition  Merz  says: 

I  may,  later  on,  have  an  opportunity  of  dwelling  more  fully  upon  this 
change  of  thought  in  the  course  of  the  nineteenth  century;  at  present  it  will 
suffice  to  point  out  that  no  subject  of  philosophical  or  scientific  interest  has 
been  more  profoundly  affected  by  it  than  the  study  of  man  in  his  individual 
and  collective  existence.  Formerly  all  the  sciences  which  have  to  do  with  this 
subject  started  from  the  study  of  the  individual  organism  or  the  individual 
mind,  frequently  disregarding  altogether  the  environment  or  collective  life  of 
man,  or  reaching  this  only  by  slow  and  uncertain  steps.  Latterly,  however, 
not  only  has  the  collective  life  of  man  attracted  more  attention  than  the  indi- 
vidual, it  has  become  rather  the  fashion  to  place  society,  in  some  form  or  other, 
in  the  foreground,  to  start  with  some  definition  of  the  social  "Together"  of 
the  collective  life  of  human  beings,  and  to  approach  in  this  way  not  only  the 
study  of  humanity  or  mankind  at  large,  but  also,  through  it,  to  get  a  better 
understanding  of  the  nature  and  the  life  of  the  individual  mind  itself.  It  is 
not  long  since  we  have  been  told  that  the  individual  mind  must  be  considered 
as  exhibiting  two  sides  which  may  be  appropriately  termed  the  subjective 
and  the  social  self;  nor  is  it  unlikely  that  from  this  point  of  view,  much  of  the 
earlier  and  later  psychology  may  be  profitably  rewritten.^  All  this  simply 
means  that  sociology  has  become  not  only  the  study  of  the  collective  interests 
of  society  and  mankind,  but  also  in  its  bearing  upon  other  philosophical  and 
scientific  problems,  an  important  and  leading  doctrine.* 

To  point  out  briefly  some  of  the  v^^ays  in  which  sociology  has  thus 
become  an  "important  and  leading  doctrine"  for  some  of  the  social 
sciences  is  the  object  of  the  rest  of  the  chapter.  No  attempt  will 
be  made,  of  course,  to  construct  a  social  science,  or  to  furnish  a 
scheme  for  such  construction.     Only  the  broadest  general  signifi- 


termed,  in  its  more  extreme  forms,  as  physiological  psychology,  objectivism,  mecha- 
nism, behaviorism.  This  reaction  tends  to  relegate  consciousness  to  a  secondary  and 
unimportant  r6le  as  a  negligible  by-product.  It  carries  the  revolt  of  functional 
psychology  still  farther.  The  latter  retains  consciousness  as  a  central  factor  in  activ- 
ity. The  term  behavioristic  psychology  is  used  to  cover  both  the  functional  and  the 
mechanistic  conceptions,  with  very  confusing  results. 

'  A  footnote  at  this  point  refers  to  Royce's  discussion  as  the  clearest  statement 
of  the  doctrine  of  the  social  self.  This  suggests  that  Merz  did  not  grasp  the  doctrine 
fully  himself,  or  Royce's  limitations  would  have  been  apparent  to  him.  This  does  not 
detract  from  the  force  of  the  quotation  given,  since  Merz's  central  thought  is  sound. 

^  History  of  European  Thought  in  the  Nineteenth  Century,  IV,  436-37. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY''     723 

cance  of  the  group  approach  for  some  of  the  social  techniques  can 
be  pointed  out. 

First  of  all,  attention  should  be  directed  to  the  significance  of 
the  group  conception  for  the  problem  of  the  relation  of  the  social 
sciences  to  each  other.  We  have  here  a  problem  which  has  con- 
sumed so  much  discussion  with  the  advent  of  each  new  division 
of  labor,  with  its  claims  for  admission  into  fields  beheved  to  be 
already  fully  occupied.  ''Thus  it  has  come  about  that  scholars 
for  a  large  part  of  the  last  two  thousand  years  have  carried  on 
intermittent  discussions  that  have  been  meanwhile  almost  utterly 
sterile  about  the  scope  and  definition  of  the  sciences."^  These 
older  struggles  are  tending  to  disappear  and  in  their  place  is  aris- 
ing a  conception  of  the  unity  of  physical  sciences  and  social  sciences.^ 
With  reference  to  the  latter  it  seems  to  follow  as  an  easy  corollary 
from  the  group  conception,  that  "social  science  is  one"  as  Small 
has  said.^  The  subject-matter  of  social  science  is  not  blocks  of 
material  which  can  be  separated  and  dealt  with  in  isolation,  but  is 
rather  a  group  in  which  all  things  are  in  relation  and  in  incessant 
movement.  From  this  it  follows  that  the  various  social  sciences 
are  but  variant  techniques  which  approach  this  common  unity 
from  different  angles  of  interpretation  and  analysis.  The  older 
claims  of  sociologists  that  theirs  is  an  independent  science,  is 
being  rapidly  displaced  by  the  realization  that  there  can  be  no 
independence  of  these  various  techniques  in  the  sense  in  which 
that  term  was  used  thirty  years  ago.  In  place  of  the  separatist 
conception  of  social  science,  there  must  be  set  up  the  conception 
of  co-ordinating  techniques  at  work  upon  the  common  group 
process  in  an  eftort  to  understand  and,  if  possible,  control  it.  It  is 
in  this  sense  that  we  have  a  real  meaning  and  purpose  for  social 
science. 

■  Small,  "Fifty  Years  of  Sociolog}'  in  the  United  States,"  American  Journal  of 
Sociology,  XXI,  822. 

'See,  for  example,  Woodward,  "The  Unity  of  Physical  Science,"  International 
Congress  of  Arts  and  Sciences,  St.  Louis  (1904),  IV,  3;  Small,  The  Meaning  of  Social 
Science,  and  "Fifty  Years  of  Sociolog>-  in  the  United  States,"  American  Journal  of 
Sociology,  XXI,  849. 

3  The  statements  of  this  paragraph  are  attempts  to  reflect  the  thought  of  Dr.  Small. 
While  the  inspiration  is  his,  the  responsibility  for  the  form  of  statement  is  not. 


724  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

The  argument  here  suggested  is  not  intended  to  do  more  than 
to  point  out  the  significance  of  the  group  concept  for  social  science 
in  general.  The  details  of  the  scheme  are  beyond  the  limits  of  this 
paper.  It  should  be  brought  out,  however,  that  the  implication 
of  the  group  concept  does  not  mean  the  abolition  of  specialization 
on  the  one  hand,  nor  the  denial  of  a  scientific  method  on  the 
other  hand.'     Both  are  essential  for  social  science. 

The  group  concept  has  further  significance  for  sociology  in  par- 
ticular, since,  with  the  surrender  of  its  older  claims  to  suzerainty, 
it  must  take  its  place  along  with  the  other  social  techniques  as  a 
co-ordinating  viewpoint.  It  thus  becomes  a  way  of  thinking,  a 
point  of  view  from  which  the  common  social  process  is  observed 
and  analyzed.  The  group  concept,  then,  furnishes  the  basis  upon 
which  it  establishes  its  claim.  Small  expresses  this  opinion  in  his 
definition  of  sociology  where  he  describes  it  as  that  "variant 
among  the  social  science  techniques  which  proceeds  from  the  per- 
ception that  all  human  phenomena  are  functions  of  groups.''^ 
The  analysis  of  group  relations,  the  group  concept,  is  the  only 
apparent  distinct  contribution  of  sociology,  and  is  its  justification 
for  a  claim  to  rank  as  one  of  the  techniques.  As  was  pointed  out 
in  the  review  of  Small's  work,  he  has  here,  it  seems,  made  a  dis- 
tinct contribution  to  sociology  in  his  suggestion  of  the  group  con- 

'  Dr.  Small's  The  Meaning  of  Social  Science  may  be  given  as  a  detailed  description 
of  the  method  whereby  specialization  and  co-ordination  may  be  achieved.  The  very 
conception  of  a  division  of  labor  implies  work  upon  a  unified  problem.  The  scientific 
method,  i.e.,  observation,  experimentation,  testing,  h>-pothesis,  etc.,  is  common  to  all 
the  sciences.  Karl  Pearson  has  an  interesting  observation  on  the  unity  of  science: 
"  The  reader  may  perhaps  feel  that  I  am  laying  stress  upon  method  at  the  expense  of 
material  content.  Now  this  is  the  peculiarity  of  scientific  method,  that  when  once 
it  has  become  a  habit  of  mind,  that  mind  converts  all  facts  whatsoever  into  science. 
The  field  of  science  is  unlimited;  its  material  is  endless,  every  group  of  natural  phe- 
nomena, every  phase  of  social  life,  ever>'  stage  of  past  or  present  development  is  material 
of  science.  The  unity  of  all  science  consists  alone  in  its  method,  not  in  its  material. 
The  man  who  classifies  facts  of  any  kind  whatever,  who  sees  their  mutual  relation 
and  describes  their  sequences,  is  applying  the  scientific  method  and  is  a  man  of  science. 
The  facts  may  belong  to  the  past  history  of  mankind,  to  the  social  statistics  of  our 
great  cities,  to  the  atmosphere  of  the  most  distant  stars,  to  the  digestive  organs  of  a 
worm  or  to  the  life  of  a  scarcely  \-isible  bacillus.  It  is  not  the  facts  themselves  which 
make  science,  but  the  method  by  which  they  are  dealt  with."— JAe  Grammar  of  Science, 
Part  I,  12. 

'  Notes  from  unpublished  lectures. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"     725 

cept  as  the  central  proposition  upon  which  sociology  may  rest  its 
case.  It  oflfers  the  most  encouraging  prospect  for  the  dissolution 
of  the  older  crudities  of  separatism  in  social  science  and  for  a 
positive  statement  of  the  meaning  and  place  of  sociology  in  Ameri- 
can thought. 

The  significance  of  the  group  concept  for  the  other  social 
sciences  may  be  indicated  by  a  brief  reference  to  some  of  the  evi- 
dences of  the  use  of  concept  by  occasional  expressing  of  some 
modem  writers  in  some  of  those  fields.  The  change  may  be 
suggested  by  pointing  to  the  growing  recognition  of  the  social 
factor  in  each  of  the  several  fields  of  labor  which  have  evolved  in 
American  thought.  In  economics,  history,  psychology,  pedagogy, 
theology,  ethics,  and  jurisprudence  this  special  sociological  con- 
cept is  beginning  to  modify  the  whole  outlook.  In  some  of  these 
branches  the  change  that  has  resulted  from  the  use  of  the  group 
concept  has  been  such  as  to  undermine  the  whole  of  the  structure. 
In  others  it  has  just  begun  and  its  end  is  not  yet  seen.  A  sociologi- 
cal approach  in  other  words,  to  these  various  divisions  of  labor  is 
far-reaching  in  its  effects.  Without  exception  they  were  built  up 
under  the  influence  of  individualistic  and  metaphysical  concep- 
tions. They  still,  for  the  most  part,  bear  unmistakable  evidences 
of  their  origin.  The  coming  of  a  social  hypothesis  means,  as 
Merz  suggested,  the  rewriting  and  reconstruction  of  economic 
theory,  of  history,  psychology,  theology,  ethics,  and  all  the  rest. 
We  may  note,  now,  some  of  the  beginnings  of  such  reconstructions. 
They  will  recall  the  parallel  movement  in  social  practice  which  was 
sketched  in  the  first  chapter. 

Among  those  sciences  which  have  to  do  with  human  behavior, 
probably  none  has  shown  such  a  thoroughgoing  reconstruction  as 
psychology.  We  have  had  occasion  above  to  refer  to  some  of  the 
changes  that  have  taken  place.  Without  attempting  to  go  into 
detail  or  to  repeat  other  statements,  one  may  epitomize  the  move- 
ment by  referring  to  it  as  the  coming  of  social  psychology.  As  a 
representative  of  the  latter  movement  and  its  significance  one  may 
cite  Baldwin.  A  layman  could  not  pretend  to  predict  what  the 
final  result  will  be,  but  the  shift  away  from  the  older  individualistic 
basis  is  unmistakable.     Indeed,  it  seems  that  among  the  ranks  of 


726  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

the  psychologists  there  are  those  who  find  no  place  for  individual 
psychology  at  all.  Baldwin  summarizes  the  transition  in  psy- 
chology thus:  "For  psychologists  and  logicians  the  problem  now 
is  to  find  any  knowledge  that  is  psychologically  private,  not  to 

find  knowledge  that  is  common  and  public The  result  is 

that  the  subjectivistic  theories  of  knowledge,  Uke  the  individualistic 
theories  of  political  science,  are  soon  to  be  laid  away  in  the  attics 
where  old  intellectual  furniture  is  stored."'  The  behaviorist 
movement,  as  has  been  mentioned,  is  a  part  of  the  transition  move- 
ment. Dewey,  in  speaking  of  the  behaviorist  movement  in  psy- 
chology, says:  "From  the  point  of  view  of  behavior  all  psychology 
is  either  biological  or  social  psychology,  and  if  it  still  be  true  that 
man  is  not  only  an  animal  but  a  social  animal,  the  two  cannot  be 
dissevered  when  we  deal  with  man."'  With  the  further  details 
of  this  change  we  are  not  concerned ;  we  are  only  to  point  out  that 
such  a  change  has  taken  place,  and  that  current  psychology  is 
still  in  a  state  of  confusion  attendant  upon  a  transition  period. ^ 
Social  psychology  is  a  corollary  of  the  group  concept  in  the  field  of 
psychology.     Its  significance  is  apparent. 

Among  the  social  sciences  no  division  showed  a  clearer  example 
of  the  older  individualistic  conceptions  than  political  economy, 
particularly  in  its  classical  form.  The  group  hypothesis  or  group 
conception  was  as  completely  ignored  or  denied  in  the  classical 
school  as  it  is  possible  to  do.  The  individual  was  assumed  as  a 
given  entity,  which  was  supreme  both  in  economic  theory  and 
practice.  At  most,  social  entanglements  were  but  necessary  ills 
and  superficial  interferences  which  had  to  be  taken  account  of  as 
a  practical  fact.  Founded  and  formulated  largely  before  an  ade- 
quate psychology  of  any  kind  existed,  before  a  social  psychology 

'  Darwin  and  the  Humantics,  p.  75. 

^  "The  Need  for  Social  Psychology,"  Psychological  Review,  XXIV,  266. 

5  Reference  cannot  be  made  to  the  large  volume  of  literature  bearing  on  the  point. 
Attention  may  be  called  again  to:  ElKvood,  "Objectivism  in  Sociology,"  American 
Journal  of  Sociology,  XXII,  289;  Bernard,  "The  Objective  Viewpoint  in  Sociology," 
ibid.,  XXV,  298;  Weiss,  "Relation  between  Structural  and  Behavior  Psychology," 
Psychological  Review,  XXIV,  301,  and  "Relation  Between  Functional  and  Behavior 
Psychology,"  ibid.,  353;  Watson,  "Psychology  and  Behavior,"  Psychological  Review, 
XX,  150;    Angell,  "Behavior  as  a  Category  of  Psychology,"  ibid.,  XX,  255. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"     727 

was  more  than  hinted  at,  and  before  an  adequate  development  of 
a  scientific  method,  it  is  not  surprising  that  economics  grew  up 
without  showing  the  results  of  these  later  developments.     Its 
philosophy  was  individualistic,  its  method  deductive.     From  those 
early  characteristics  it  has  not  yet  recovered  completely.     This  is 
true  even  in  America,  where  other  influences  early  entered  in  to 
modify  the   harshness  of  political  economy  as  it  developed  in 
England  prior  to  John  Stuart  Mill'  who  attempted  to  reform  the 
subject,  and  place  it  on  more  modern  bases.     From  the  rigid 
individualism   of   the  classical  school  up  to  the  more  advanced 
economists  of  America  is  a  period  of  considerable  progress.     The 
limits  of  this  paper  forbid  any  pretension  to  record  the  changes 
that  have  taken  place,  or,  indeed,  to  do  more  than  call  attention 
to  some  of  the  earlier  limitations  of  the  classical  school.     The  diflfer- 
ence  in  economic  life  which  prevailed  in  this  country,  the  influence 
of  German  thought  since  1870,  the  infiltration  of  the  influence  of  the 
Austrian  school,  and  finally  the  neo-classical  synthesis  of  Marshall, 
tended  to  give  economics  an  evolutionary  trend  toward  a  theoreti- 
cal basis  which  is  more  in  accordance  with  the  results  arrived  at  in 
other  social  sciences.     Both  social  theory,  as  developed  by  other 
social  sciences,  and  social  evolution,  as  shown  by  the  practical 
development  of  American  industry,  trade,  and  life  in  general,  have 
made  necessar}^  a  movement  in  economic  thought  toward  a  diluted 
social  h>-pothesis.     Some  passages  from  Ely  may  serve  to  illustrate 
the  diflerence  between  the  philosophy  which  characterized  the  older 
economy  and  that  of  the  new:    ''The  attempt  of  the  classical 
economists  to  isolate  an  'economic  man'    ruled  entirely  by  an 
enlightened  self-interest  and  unaffected  by  political,  ethical,  and 
humanitarian  impulses,  is  recognized  to  have  been  a  mistake."^ 
As  contrasted  with  this  description  of  the  classical  school  modern 
economics   recognizes   social   relationships   as   important:     "Our 
science  then  is  interested  in  man  in  his  relations  to  others,  and  not 

'  "The  reaction  against  English  economists,  it  is  interesting  to  note,  began  earlier 
in  the  United  States  than  in  England  or  Germany."— Ely,  Oullincs  of  Economics, 
p.  672.  "Almost  from  the  beginning  the  peculiar  environmental  conditions  met 
with  in  America  have  given  a  characteristic  set  of  tendencies  to  American  economics." 
— Haney,  History  of  Ecotiomic  Thought,  p.  511. 

^Outlines  of  Economics,  p.  675. 


728  TEE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

in  man  by  himself.  Moreover,  as  a  science  which  studies  the 
present  in  order  that  it  may  predict  and  prepare  for  the  future, 
and  discovering  that  interdependence  is  the  law  of  progress,  it  must 
not  hesitate  to  shape  its  principles  with  reference  to  a  solidarity 
which  shall  grow  more  rather  than  less,  stronger  rather  than 
weaker.'" 

One  must  recognize  then  that  current  economic  theory  has 
made  considerable  advance  from  the  stricter  classical  school  of 
the  first  half  of  the  nineteenth  century,  ''Economists  are  realiz- 
ing the  interrelation  of  things;  more  and  more  the  quest  for  abso- 
lute law  of  causation  is  modified  by  a  knowledge  that  things  move 
in  circles  and  mutually  determine  one  another  as  do  supply, 
demand,  and  price. "^  While  admitting  the  force  of  this  state- 
ment with  all  that  it  implies  in  theory  and  practice,  one  must  still 
come  to  the  conclusion  that  current  economic  theory  has  not  yet 
been  penetrated  very  deeply  with  the  conclusions  arrived  at  by 
contemporary  social  psychology,  with  its  emphasis  upon  the  sig- 
nificance of  the  group  in  the  formation  and  control  of  men.  Eco- 
nomic theory  in  America  today  is  still  fundamentally  individualistic; 
it  still  conceives  mind  as  a  datum  rather  than  as  a  social  product; 
it  still  assumes  the  wants  of  the  individual  as  given  and  relatively 
fijced;  it  still  assumes  the  medieval  doctrine  of  the  freedom  of  the 
will  and  choice;  it  still  interprets  freedom  in  the  negative  sense 
as  absence  of  restraint  and  interference;  it  still  emphasizes  unduly 
"individual  initiative"  and  individual  struggle  for  existence  and 
tends  to  ignore  the  correlative  fact  of  co-operation  or  group  activity. 
In  a  word,  contemporary  economics  still  employs  an  antiquated 
psychology  in  the  solution  of  all  its  problems.^  Once  a  grasp  of 
group  concept  with  its  psychological  implications  is  obtained,  it 
will  mean  the  rewriting  of  all  economic  theory,  in  so  far  as  it  has 
not  already  been  done.  The  transformation  for  economics  will  be 
as  that  of  psychology  has  been. 

There  have  appeared  some  current  evidences  of  the  movement 
to  reconstruct  economic  theory  in  the  light  of  the  group  concep- 

■  Outlines  of  Economics,  p.  6.        '  Haney,  History  oj  Economic  Thought,  p.  549. 
3  Merely  as  an  illustration  one  might  cite  Carver's  Principles  of  Political  Economy 
(1919)  as  an  exhibit  of  all  these  shortcomings. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"     729 

tion.  It  is  beyond  the  purpose  here  to  attempt  to  sketch  any  of 
these  attempts  even  in  its  most  general  details.  They  are  to  be 
cited  merely  as  illustrations  of  possible  ways  in  which  the  group 
concept  may  be  applied  to  the  resuscitation  of  economic  theory. 
Possibly  the  most  ambitious  effort  was  the  attempt  to  restate  the 
theory  of  value,  the  central  process  in  economic  theory,  which 
appeared  in  Anderson's  Social  Valued  Broadly  speaking,  the 
book  may  be  characterized  as  an  attempt  to  apply  a  functional 
social  psychology  to  the  value  problem.  In  order  to  get  his  point 
of  view  it  will  be  well  to  allow  him  to  summarize  his  argument, 
in  so  far  as  it  bears  on  our  purpose.  After  referring  to  earlier 
theories  of  value  among  the  economists,  he  continues : 

The  defect  is  in  the  highly  abstract  nature  of  the  determinants  of  values 
which  these  theories  start  from;  they  abstract  the  individual  mind  from  its  con- 
nection with  the  social  whole,  and  then  abstract  from  the  individual's  mind  only 
those  emotions  which  are  directly  concerned  with  the  consumption  and  produc- 
tion of  economic  goods;  this  abstraction  is  necessitated  by  the  individuaUstic, 
subjectivistic  conception  of  society,  which  growing  out  of  the  skeptical  philoso- 
phy of  Hume  has  dominated  economic  theory  ever  since:  Present  day  sociology 
has  rejected  this  conception  of  society,  and  has  re-established  the  organic  con- 
ception of  society  in  psychological,  rather  than  biological  terms,  which  makes 
it  possible  to  treat  society  as  a  whole  as  the  source  of  values  of  goods ;  this  does 
not  obviate  the  necessity  for  close  analysis,  nor  does  it,  in  itself,  solve  the  prob- 
lem, but  it  does  give  us  an  adequate  point  of  view;  the  determinants  of  value 
include  not  only  the  highly  abstract  factors  which  the  value  theories  here 
criticized  have  undertaken  to  handle  arithmetically,  but  also  all  the  other 
volitional  factors  in  the  inter-mental  life  of  men  in  society — not  an  arithmetical 
synthesis  of  elements,  but  an  organic  whole;  legal  and  ethical  values  are  espe- 
cially to  be  taken  into  account  in  a  theory  of  economic  value,  particularly  those 
most  immediately  concerned  with  distribution.^ 

•  The  term  "social  value"  is  not  original  with  Anderson  among  the  economists 
It  was  first  used  in  this  country  by  Clark  in  188 1  and  has  been  used  by  various  writers 
since  then.  The  theory  of  social  value  held  by  those  writers  has  been  severely  criticized 
by  other  economists,  and  rightly  so  perhaps,  for  it  was  lacking  the  essential  psychologi- 
cal basis  for  a  logical  structure.  As  used  by  those  eariier  writers,  the  concept  repre- 
sented either  a  summation  of  individual  values  or  a  valuation  based  on  the  discarded 
biological  analog>-.  .■Vnderson's  contribution  is  that  he  supplies,  in  a  more  or  less 
madequate  way,  the  psychological  foundation  upon  which  a  theory  of  social  value 
may  rest  if  it  is  to  have  real  worth. 

'  Social  Value,  pp.  197-99.  With  reference  to  the  relation  between  ethics  and 
economic  theory  suggested  in  the  last  clause  of  the  quotation,  one  may  note  Stuart's 
conclusion:  "Ethics  and  economic  theory,  instead  of  dealing  with  separate  problems 


730  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

Economic  activity  in  society,  is  an  intricate,  complex  thing,  for  the  motiva- 
tion of  which  no  individual's  motives  can  suffice.  If  motivated  at  all,  its 
guidance  comes  from  something  super-individual,  and  that  something  is  social 
value.  Ends,  aims,  purposes,  desires,  of  many  men,  mutually  interacting  and 
mutually  determining  each  other,  modifying,  stimulating,  creating  each  other, 
take  tangible  determinate  shape,  as  economic  values,  and  the  technique  of  the 
social  economic  organization  responds  and  carries  them  out.' 

These  quotations  are  sufficient  to  illustrate  the  point  of  view 
from  which  contemporary  economic  theory  may  be  reconstructed. 
It  amounts  to  an  application  of  the  group  concept  to  a  particular 
part  of  one  of  the  social  sciences.  It  is  not  implied  that  the  task 
has  been  fully  or  successfully  performed  by  the  writer  quoted.'  It 
does,  however,  represent  an  attempt  to  apply  the  conclusions  of 
social  psychology  to  an  admittedly  difficult  problem  in  economic 
theory.  It  is  pioneer  work,  but  is  an  illuminating  illustration  of 
the  beginning  of  reconstruction  of  economic  theory  due  to  an  appli- 
cation of  the  group  hypothesis. 

In  the  preceding  chapter,  attention  was  called  to  the  effort  of 
Cooley  to  deal  with  the  subject  of  pecuniary  valuation  from  the 
same  group  or  social  standpoint.^  His  point  of  view  is  essentially 
the  same  as  that  of  Anderson.  He  analyzes  the  problem  from 
the  standpoint  of  the  group,  including  within  the  problem  the 
social  process  of  the  formation  of  demand  rather  than  assuming 
it  as  given.  The  market  is  a  group  phenomenon  which  creates  its 
own  values  as  much  or  more  than  it  is  created  by  individual 
demands.  It  is  an  institution  which  has  an  existence  of  its  own 
and  bends  individual  desire  to  its  own  likeness.  As  was  pointed 
out  in  the  review  of  his  writings,  the  discussion  is  significant  in  its 
attempt  to  substitute  a  group  conception  of  the  problem  for  an 
individual  one.  His  discussion  is  cited  here  as  another  illustration 
of  the  attempt  that  is  slowly  being  made  to  put  a  sociological  foun- 

of  conduct,  deal  with  distinguishable  but  inseparable  stages  belonging  to  the  com- 
plete analysis  of  most,  if  not  all,  problems. — Creative  InlclUgcncc,  p.  349.  Stuart's 
essay,  "Phases  of  the  Economic  Interest,"  is  also  of  significance  on  other  points  con- 
nected with  the  problems  of  economic  theory. 

^Social  Value,  pp.  197-99. 

'  Mead's  criticism  of  the  book  from  the  standpoint  of  social  psychology  is  tren- 
chant.    See  Psychological  Bulletin,  December,  191 2,  p.  435. 
5  Social  Process. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"     731 

dation  under  the  economic  structure  which  has  been  reared  on  an 
individualistic  psychology.  It  gives  a  concrete  expression  to  the 
significance  of  the  group  concept  for  economic  theory.  Such  expres- 
sions parallel  the  actual  changes  taking  place  in  our  economic  life. 

In  taking  up  the  significance  of  the  group  concept  for  history 
one  cannot  do  more  than  merely  suggest  in  the  faintest  way  some 
general  considerations.  The  whole  problem  of  the  study  of  history, 
its  methods,  and  point  of  view,  is  so  vast  and  complicated  even  for 
the  historians,  that  one  outside  cannot  hope  to  summarize  the  field 
in  a  few  paragraphs.  This  need  not  deter  one,  however,  from 
some  general  observations  which  seem  to  arise  naturally  from  the 
preceding  pages.  Certain  modern  writers  will  serve  as  examples 
of  the  shifts  in  point  of  view  and  method  which  indicate  the  com- 
ing of  a  "new  history."'  Most  significant  changes  have  taken 
place  in  the  course  of  the  nineteenth  century.  History,  like  all 
other  bodies  of  knowledge,  has  been  largely  transformed  as  a 
result  of  the  progress  of  science,  particularly  as  crystallized  and 
set  forth  by  Darwin  and  his  followers.  This  change,  which  has 
taken  and  is  taking  place,  may  be  conveniently  summarized  in 
saying  that  history,  since  the  middle  of  the  past  century,  has  been 
seriously  affected  by  the  imperative  of  the  scientific  spirit  and 
method,  which  was  so  characteristic  of  that  period.  The  older 
point  of  view  in  historical  writing  and  study  is  characterized  thus 
by  one  writer: 

Indeed  we  shall  not  be  far  astray,  if  we  view  history,  as  it  has  existed 
through  the  ages,  and  even  down  to  our  own  day,  as  a  branch  of  general  lit- 
erature, the  object  of  which  has  been  to  present  past  events  in  an  artistic 
manner,  in  order  to  gratify  a  natural  curiosity  in  regard  to  the  achievements 
and  fate  of  conspicuous  persons,  the  rise  and  decay  of  monarchies,  and  the  sig- 
nal commotions  and  disasters  which  have  repeatedly  afflicted  humanity.' 

Into  the  writing  of  this  type  of  history  the  past  century  brought 
the  doctrine  of  continuity.  Although  this  doctrine  had  been 
developing  before  the  middle  of  the  past  century,  it  was  not  until 

'.\mong  others,  Lamprecht,  WItat  Is  History?  Robinson,  The  New  History; 
Green,  Short  History  of  the  English  People;  Becker,  "Some  .Aspects  of  the  Influence 
of  Social  Problems  and  Ideas  upon  the  Study  and  Writing  of  History,"  American 
Journal  of  Sociology,  XVIII,  641. 

'  Robinson,  The  New  History,  p.  27. 


732  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

the  coming  of  the  work  of  Darwin  and  Lyell  that  the  real  founda- 
tions of  the  conception  of  the , continuity  of  history  and  indefinite 
progress  and  change  were  estabhshed.'  The  principle  of  continu- 
ity is  essentially  a  corollary  of  the  group  concept;  it  is  an  appli- 
cation of  the  principle  of  seeing  things  "in  their  together"  as 
Merz  has  expressed  the  concept.  It  is  a  temporal  application  of 
the  fundamental  notion  in  the  group  concept.  The  essence  of 
the  doctrine  is  expressed  in  these  words  of  Robinson : 

The  doctrine  of  the  continuity  of  history  is  based  ujx)n  the  observed  fact 
that  every  human  institution,  every  generally  accepted  idea,  every  important 
invention,  is  but  the  summation  of  long  lines  of  progress,  reaching  back  as  far 
as  we  have  the  patience  or  means  to  follow  them.  The  jury,  the  drama,  the 
GatUng  gun,  the  papacy,  the  letter  S,  the  doctrine  of  stare  decisis,  each  owes 
its  present  form  to  antecedents  which  can  be  scientifically  traced.' 

In  other  words,  the  principle  of  continuity,  which  has  revolution- 
ized the  methods  of  historical  writing,  is  an  application  of  the 
sociological  conception  of  the  group  as  a  fundamental  unity,  and 
an  application  of  the  mechanism  of  the  group  process,  or  social 
psychology,  to  an  interpretation  of  any  fact  or  situation  viewed 
chronologically.  The  boundary  line  between  the  historian  and 
the  sociologist  is  of  no  concern  here.^  The  chief  end  in  view  at 
this  point  is  merely  to  point  out  that  the  group  approach  to  the 
study  of  what  is  called  history  is  one  of  the  most  significant  facts 
in  the  type  of  history  that  has  appeared  in  the  last  century,  and 
is  of  increasing  importance  in  the  latter  half  of  that  century. 

The  group  concept  implies,  not  only  the  unity  of  the  social 
process  in  its  continuous  development,  but  also  the  fundamental 
unity  of  a  particular  period  in  that  development.  The  older  t\pe 
of  political  history,  which  concerned  itself  chiefly  with  strictly 
political  problems,  grew  up  largely  as  a  result  of  the  interest  in 

'  Robinson,  The  New  History,  p.  80.  Small  has  given  Savigny,  1779-1861,  a 
leading  place  in  the  development  of  the  principle  of  continuity  but  points  out  that 
Savigny  deserted  his  important  principle,  in  part,  in  his  controversy  with  Thibaut 
over  the  matter  of  codification  in  18 14.  See  "The  Present  Outlook  of  Social  Science," 
American  Journal  of  Sociology,  XVIII,  433. 

'  Robinson,  The  New  History,  p.  64. 

3  Small  has  presented  an  interesting  discussion  of  one  of  the  boundary  controver- 
sies, that  at  New  Orleans  in  1903.  See  "  Fifty  Years  of  Sociology,"  American  Journal 
of  Sociology,  XXI,  816. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"     733 

political  problems  which  was  stimulated  by  the  political  chaos 
that  resulted  from  the  political  disturbances  attendant  upon  the 
French  Revolution.  Historians  were  interested  in  the  matters 
that  were  occupying  attention.  The  crisis  that  presented  itself  in 
various  groups  and  in  the  world  was  deemed  a  pohtical  crisis 
solely  and  the  attempts  of  the  historians  to  recount  those  events 
took  on  a  pecuHarly  biased  political  tone.  The  error  of  the  type 
of  history  which  has  been  called  pohtical  history  is  the  easy  assump- 
tion of  the  priority  of  the  pohtical  and  dramatic  in  the  life  of  a 
given  group  and  the  neglect  of  the  commonplace  and  habitual. 
In  other  words,  this  type  of  history  is  a  violation  of  the  group 
conception  of  the  social  process.  The  type  of  history  that  the 
group  concept  demands  of  the  historian  is  not  an  account  of  the 
accidental,  if  indeed  such  a  thing  as  a  historical  accident  be  pos- 
sible, but  a  picture  of  the  hfe  as  a  whole.  The  conception  of  the 
group  as  the  fundamental  unity  within  which  all  things  find  their 
relations,  and  their  meanings  must  necessarily  transform  the  pohti- 
cal type  of  history  into  a  more  adequate  analysis,  or  surround  it 
with  such  quahfications  that  it  ceases  to  have  much  value  for  any 
practical  purposes.  The  point  of  view  here  suggested  has  been 
well  put  by  Cooley: 

The  organic  view  of  history  denies  that  any  factor  or  factors  are  more 
ultimate  than  others.  Indeed  it  denies  that  the  so-called  factors,  such  as  the 
mind,  the  various  institutions,  the  physical  environment,  and  so  on — have  any 
real  existence  apart  from  a  total  hfe  in  which  all  share  in  the  same  way  that 

the  members  of  the  body  share  in  the  life  of  the  animal  organism We 

may  concentrate  attention  upon  some  one  of  these  things,  but  this  concentra- 
tion should  never  go  so  far  as  to  overlook  the  subordination  of  each  to  the 
whole,  or  to  conceive  one  as  precedent  to  others.' 

The  transition  that  has  taken  place  from  the  older  type  of  poht- 
ical history  to  the  more  modern  type  of  history,  which  is  more  in 
accordance  with  the  conception  of  group  unity,  reflects  a  growing 
change  in  the  attitudes  of  historians.  The  shift  is  by  no  means 
complete,  but  it  has  been  fundamental.  The  most  important 
cause  of  the  change  toward  a  social  type  of  history  has  been  the 

'  Quoted  by  Small  as  a  part  of  the  New  Orleans  discussion  referred  to  above, 
"Fifty  Years  of  Sociology  in  the  United  States,"  American  Journal  of  Sociology, 
XXI,  813. 


734  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

changes  that  have  taken  place  in  the  actual  life  of  the  nations,  a 
change  which  one  may  briefly  but  perhaps  inadequately  charac- 
terize as  the  emergence  of  the  social  problem.  One  of  the  con- 
tributing factors  in  helping  along  this  change  was  the  work  of  the 
sociologists  who  were  developing  the  notion  of  society,  and  who 
had  a  conception  of  the  unity  of  the  thing  they  were  describing. 
The  newer  type  of  history  developed  later  in  America  than  in 
England,  or  Germany,  but  it  has  been  increasingly  influential  in  all 
three  since  the  last  quarter  of  the  nineteenth  century.  A  social 
history  is  an  implication  of  the  group  concept  applied  to  the 
analysis  of  past  group  phenomena.  That  such  a  view  increases 
the  problem  of  the  historian  enormously  is  apparent,  but  the 
difficulty  of  the  task  is  no  excuse  for  the  failure  to  accept  the 
responsibiUty,  provided  history  is  to  have  any  practical  value  at 
all,  outside  of  mere  amusement  in  dealing  with  historical  effigies. 
The  difficulty  of  the  problem  of  the  study  of  history,  when  viewed 
from  the  group  conception,  assumes  such  proportions  that  the  value 
of  most  of  the  history  for  the  current  popular  comparisons  between 
the  past  and  the  present  is  almost  neghgible.  A  recognition  of 
the  bearing  of  the  group  concept,  with  its  implied  social  psychol- 
ogy must  discount  almost  to  the  vanishing-point  any  proposals  of 
historical  analogies,  except  when  made  by  the  most  careful  scholar. 
It  has  the  negative  value,  in  this  respect,  if  no  other,  of  arousing 
caution  in  the  face  of  easy  historical  proofs.  "If  we  find  ourselves 
guessing  about  the  undercurrents  of  politics  in  our  own  ward,  the 
suspicion  naturally  steals  in  upon  us  that  we  may  have  believed 
fairy  tales  about  the  Wars  of  the  Roses,  or  the  revolts  of  the 
Italian  Cities,  or  the  European  War  of  1914.'" 

The  underlying  defect  in  historical  method  of  the  past  has  been 
the  inadequate  psychology  which  formed  its  prepossessions  and  thus 
shaped  its  whole  procedure.  The  assumption  of  the  individual  as  a 
datum,  particularly  in  the  case  of  its  distinguished  personages;  the 
assumption  of  a  mind  or  soul  as  somehow  prior,  as  a  thing  in  itself, 
which  may  be  taken  for  granted  without  creating  it,  these  have 
been  the  cardinal  errors  of  not  only  the  earlier  history  but  even  of 

•  Small,  "Fifty  Years  of  Sociology  in  the  United  States,"  American  Journal  of 
Sociology,  XXI,  835. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"      735 

that  of  today.  As  a  part  of  the  group  conception  of  the  nature  of 
any  given  part  of  human  life  one  must,  if  one  purposes  to  escape 
violent  abstractions,  explain  and  create  one's  great  characters. 
To  assume  the  person,  Alexander,  Caesar,  Jesus,  or  Washington, 
is  to  give  only  half  the  process  which  makes  up  the  historical 
whole.  The  historian's  problem  is  as  much  that  of  the  details  of 
the  creation  of  these  characters  as  it  is  to  recount  their  acts.  In 
other  words,  it  seems  there  can  be  no  adequate  history  which  has 
not  assimilated  the  essence  of  modern  social  psychology,  with  its 
fundamental  viewpoint  of  the  unity  of  the  group-individual  situa- 
tion. Historians  have,  of  course,  done  much  to  escape  the  more 
exaggerated  forms  of  the  "great  man"  theory.  They  have  still  to 
emancipate  themselves  from  the  ''common  man"  theory,  in  which 
the  individual  is  assumed  rather  than  socially  or  groupally  created. 
It  is  in  this  latter  respect  that  the  group  concept  and  its  implica- 
tions will  continue  the  revolution  in  the  method  of  history. 

In  attempting  to  relate  the  group  concept  to  the  field  of  ethics 
little  more  is  necessary  than  to  suggest  the  large  volume  of  thought 
that  has  been  given  to  the  development  of  ethical  systems  within 
recent  years,  and  the  place  that  the  social  or  group  point  of  view 
has  assumed  in  those  systems.^  One  may  say,  in  fact,  that  the 
latter  point  of  view  has  become  the  predominant  one  in  ethical 
studies  in  this  country.  The  changes  that  have  taken  place  may 
be  summarized  in  the  statement  that  the  center  of  gravity  in 
ethical  thought  has  shifted  from  the  theological,  first  to  the  meta- 
physical, and  then  to  the  social  or  group  basis.  In  the  rough, 
Comte's  three  stages  suggest  the  course  of  thought  upon  ethical 
problems.  Prior  to  the  eighteenth  century,  the  sources  and  sanc- 
tions of  the  ethical  systems  were  found  in  a  religious  philosophy 
which  had  dominated  the  thought  of  Europe  for  centuries,  and 
which  is  still  the  dominant  system  of  ethics  among  the  rank  and 
file  of  American  people.  The  revolt  in  France  in  the  eighteenth 
century  and  the  skeptical  movement  of  thought  in  Germany  and 
England  paved  the  way  for  the  transition  from  a  theocratic  to  a 
democratic  point  of  view.  Intermediate  between  the  two  stages, 
the  theocratic  and  the  social,  appeared  the  philosophy  of  Kant, 

'  For  example,  Dewey  and  Tufts,  Eihics. 


736  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

which  sought  to  find  a  new  foundation  for  an  ethical  system. 
Kant,  seeking  new  sanctions,  founded  his  system  upon  the  human 
reason,  and  was  thus  instrumental  in  distorting  German  thought 
up  to  the  present  time.  Though  France  and  England  escaped 
some  of  the  intermediate  distortions  that  were  found  in  Germany 
and  proceeded  more  directly  to  a  more  scientific  system  of  morals, 
it  remained  for  the  latter  half  of  the  past  century  to  bring  forth  the 
further  transition  to  the  sociological  point  of  view  as  the  most 
promising  way  of  approach  to  the  problem  of  morals. 

The  significance  of  the  group  hypothesis  for  ethics  lies  in  several 
things.  In  the  first  place,  it  relieves  the  problem  of  all  super- 
natural problems.  The  roots  of  moral  practices,  of  codes,  of  sanc- 
tions, must  be  looked  for  in  the  life  of  the  group.  In  the  second 
place,  the  psychological  implications  of  the  place  of  the  group  in 
the  development  of  the  individual  impose  increasing  responsibility 
upon  ethical  theory  to  explain  its  ethical  individuals,  the  "genius" 
as  well  as  the  follower,  in  terms  of  group  relationships.  That  is, 
moral  leaders  are  products  rather  than  data.  It  cannot  assume 
a  pre-existing  faculty  of  reason,  but  must  develop  its  ethical 
individual  out  of  a  congeries  of  animal  instincts.  In  the  third 
place,  the  group  concept  imposes  upon  the  system  of  ethics  that 
it  find  its  tests  or  criteria,  as  well  as  its  sanctions,  in  the  group 
life.  Beyond  the  group  there  is  no  appeal.  In  other  words,  the 
whole  ethical  system  must  be  founded  on  a  scientific  method, 
which  finds  its  place  in  a  group  situation.  The  whole  significance 
of  the  group  hypothesis  for  the  field  of  ethics  may  be  summed  up 
in  the  statement  that  moral  conduct  is  always  social,  it  always 
involves  socii. 

What  has  been  stated  in  the  preceding  paragraph  amounts  to 
saying  that  the  group  approach  to  the  ethical  field  is  the  sine  qua 
non  in  contemporary  thought.  It  is  the  dominant  influence  of 
group  life  which  runs  through  the  history  and  evolution  of  morals. 
Something  like  this  thought,  it  seems,  was  in  the  mind  of  the 
writer  of  the  following: 

Ethics  must  consist  of  empty  forms  until  sociology  can  indicate  the  sub- 
stance to  which  the  forms  apply.  Every  ethical  judgement  with  an  actual 
content  has  at  least  tacitly  presupposed  a  sociology.     Every  individual  or 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  ''DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"     737 

social  estimate  of  good  or  bad,  of  right  and  wrong,  current  today,  assumes  a 
sociology.  No  code  of  morals  can  be  adopted  in  the  future  without  implying 
a  sociology  as  part  of  its  premises.  To  those  acquainted  with  both  the  history 
of  ethics  and  the  scope  of  sociology  these  propositions  are  almost  self-evident.' 

One  of  the  fields  of  study  which  has  been  least  afifected  by  the 
group  concept  is  that  of  jurisprudence.  This  is  peculiarly  signifi- 
cant for  the  sociologist,  since  the  problem  of  social  control  and 
social  change  involves  the  legal  and  political  machinery  which 
limits  and  conditions  any  change.  For  some  reason,  the  impor- 
tance of  the  group  approach  to  jurisprudence  has  not  been  ade- 
quately recognized  by  sociologists,  either  on  its  theoretical  side  or 
on  the  practical  side.  Small  is  well  within  the  truth  when  he 
states  that  it  is  "equally  astonishing  and  unfortunate  that  for 
nearly  a  generation  legal  institutions  were  left  almost  wholly  out- 
side the  range  of  American  sociologists'  vision."^  This  situation 
suggests  the  necessity  and  justification  for  a  brief  reference  to  the 
implications,  for  jurisprudence,  of  the  group  concept  as  it  has  been 
elaborated  in  the  preceding  pages. 

The  coming  of  the  group  conception,  with  its  psychological 
implications,  will  mean  for  jurisprudence  what  it  has  meant  in  all 
the  other  social  sciences,  an  almost  complete  change  of  view  and 
method  in  making  further  pursuits  of  the  particular  quests.  The 
need  for  the  revamping  of  jurisprudence  in  America  has  vital 
significance  at  this  time  in  its  social  evolution  because  the  practical 
afi"airs  of  our  national  economic  and  social  life  have  already  under- 
gone such  important  changes  that  a  new  type  of  juristic  and 
political  thought  is  necessary  to  keep  up  with  the  demands  made 
by  these  practical  changes.  The  archaic  philosophy  of  the  legal 
profession,  which  includes  the  bench  as  well,  assumes  peculiar 
importance  in  this  country  since  the  latter's  political  and  juristic 
framework  is  so  completely  in  the  hands  of  this  one  profession. 
The  extreme  difficulty  of  securing  adaptive  machinery  for  social 
changes,  when  contrary  to  the  trend  of  opinion  of  the  judiciary 
and  law>'ers,  has  been  more  noticeable  here  than  in  some  other 
countries.     If  one  add  to  this,  the  fact  that  the  constitutions  of 

'  Small,  General  Sociology,  p.  663. 

'Encyclopaedia  Americana,  article  on  "Sociology,"  1919. 


738  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

both  the  United  States  and  the  various  states  are  incrusted  expres- 
sions of  the  older  views  which  reflected  a  period  of  development  in 
our  economic  and  social  life  that  was  naive  and  crude,  on  the 
one  hand,  and  completely  dominated  by  a  prescientific  and  pre- 
social  theory  of  government  and  society  on  the  other,  then  the 
practical  need  for  a  reconstruction  of  the  fundamentals  of  juris- 
prudence, becomes  apparent.  The  pressing  necessity  for  moderni- 
zation of  jurisprudence  has  led  one  writer  to  say  that  "perhaps 
nowhere  in  our  national  life  is  the  growing  recognition  of  the 
group  or  community  principle  so  fundamental  for  us  as  in  our 
modern  theory  of  law."^ 

To  return  to  the  theoretical  aspect  of  the  problem,  which  is  the 
principal  object  of  interest  here,  it  will  be  well  to  point  out  that 
on  the  whole  the  legal  profession  and  the  courts  are  still  in  that 
period  of  thinking  which  may  be  called  the  philosophical  tendency, 
which  flourished  in  the  time  of  Blackstone  and  his  followers  of  the 
eighteenth  and  nineteenth  centuries.  The  law  is  still  felt  to  be 
reason,  and  the  method  is  that  of  deducing  rules  to  apply  to  par- 
ticular cases.  The  psychological  prepossession  is  still,  as  it  was 
then,  an  individualistic  one,  frequently  a  faculty  one.  The  impli- 
cations of  the  group  viewpoint  with  its  psychological  emphasis 
upon  function  and  the  social  creation  of  the  self  have  scarcely 
penetrated  the  thought  of  the  legal  profession.  Its  general  phi- 
losophy is  that  of  the  metaphysician  and  medieval  churchman 
with  his  absolutes  and  essences  rather  than  that  of  the  scientist 
with  his  tentative  hypotheses  and  scientific  method  of  observation, 
experimentation,  and  conclusions  based  on  actual  results.  One 
still  reads  of  natural  rights,  of  individual  freedom  as  against  govern- 
mental aggression,  of  the  doctrine  of  contract,  of  individual  rights 
which  antedate  all  government  and  law.  Even  where  the  courts 
have  allowed  the  facts  of  life  to  force  limitations  of  their  philosophi- 
cal prepossessions,  they  have  done  so  grudgingly,  and  have  sus- 
tained their  decisions  on  the  basis  of  special  protection  to  a  certain 
class  or  individuals  rather  than  on  the  basis  of  general  group 
interest.  Cases  are  still  decided,  in  the  main,  on  abstract  issues 
and    antiquated    economic    and    political   philosophy.     In    other 

'  Follett,  The  New  Slate,  p.  122. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  ''DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY''     739 

words,  the  situation  which  is  presented  is  one  in  which  an  incrusted 
legal  philosophy,  embodied  in  a  political  framework,  and  backed 
by  a  written  constitution,  and  interpreted  in  the  light  of  a  pre- 
scientific  legal  tradition,  has  come  into  conflict  with  a  changed 
and  changing  situation.  The  fundamental  assumption  of  the  legal 
philosophy  was  the  priority  of  the  individual,  while  the  reahty  of 
the  latter  is  the  fact  of  group  life.  Until  there  can  be  a  reforma- 
tion of  the  former  on  the  basis  of  analysis  of  the  latter  in  terms  of 
an  adequate  social  psychology  there  must  result  conflict  and  dis- 
respect for  law  and  for  its  interpreters.'  The  situation  of  conflict 
between  the  prepossessions  of  the  older  school  and  the  incipient 
"sociological"  school  is  thus  expressed  by  a  representative  of  the 
latter: 

A  Bench  and  Bar  trained  in  individualistic  theories  and  firm  in  the  per- 
suasion that  the  so-called  legal  justice  is  an  absolute  and  a  necessary  standard, 
from  which  there  may  be  no  departure  without  the  destruction  of  the  legal 
order,  may  retard  but  cannot  prevent  progress  in  the  newer  standard  recog- 
nized by  the  sociologist.  In  this  progress  lawyers  should  be  conscious  factors, 
not  unconscious  followers  of  popular  thought,  not  conscious  obstructors  of  the 
course  of  legal  development.^ 

The  significance  of  the  group  concept  when  applied  to  this  particu- 
lar field,  is  that  it  would  serve  to  supplant  the  older  obstructionist 
legal  philosophy  with  a  point  of  view  and  method  which  would  be 
in  harmony  with  the  contemporary  scientific  thought.  The  impor- 
tance of  this  progress  in  a  highly  organized  group,  such  as  the 
United  States,  is  very  great. 

The  foregoing  paragraphs  are  not  intended  to  ignore  the  evi- 
dences of  a  transition  to  a  new  point  of  view,  and  it  may  be  well 
to  mention  some  of  them.  Attention  may  be  called,  in  the  first 
place,  to  some  of  the  practical  changes  that  have  taken  place  in 
legislation  and  in  the  decisions  involving  the  constitutionality  of 
such  statutes.  These  changes  appear  in  several  different  aspects. 
There  is  an  increasing  tendency  of  law  to  impose  limitations  on 

'  See,  for  example,  Pound,  "  The  Need  of  a  Sociological  Jurisprudence, "  Green  Bag, 
October,  1907,  and  "Causes  of  Popular  Dissatisfaction  with  Administration  of  Justice," 
American  Bar  Association  Reports,  1906. 

'  Pound,  "The  Need  of  a  Sociological  Jurisprudence,"  Green  Bag,  October,  1907; 
"Causes  of  Popular  Dissatisfaction  with  Administration  of  Justice,"  American  Bar 
Association  Reports,  1906. 


740  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

the  use  of  property  and  greater  regard  for  the  human  element; 
limitations  upon  freedom  of  contract  are  shown  in  statutes  regu- 
lating conditions  of  labor,  in  the  law  of  insurance,  in  decisions 
estabhshing  quasi-contractual  in  place  of  strictly  contractual 
duties  of  public  service  corporations;  limitations;  upon  the  right  of 
creditors  or  injured  parties  to  secure  satisfaction,  i.e.,  exemption 
laws;  imposition  of  liability  without  fault  in  such  laws  as  work- 
ingmen's  compensation;  changes  in  the  law  of  water  rights 
with  a  view  to  enhancing  the  group  interest  and  right  there- 
in.^ There  have  been  minority  views  among  jurists  which 
have  recognized  the  necessity  of  a  new  jurisprudence.  Such 
judges,  for  example,  as  Justice  Holmes  and  Justice  Brandeis  of  the 
United  States  Supreme  Court,  have  been  found  interpreting  the 
newer  points  of  view.  In  the  field  of  theory,  the  most  noted 
efforts  to  establish  a  sociological  jurisprudence  and  to  attempt  to 
replace  the  older  philosophy  of  the  law  with  a  modern  viewpoint 
have  been  those  of  Roscoe  Pound. ^  Similar  efforts  have  been 
made  by  Wigmore^  and  Frankfurter,'*  not  to  mention  others. 
The  newer  school,  represented  by  the  latter  group  of  pioneers,  had 
its  origin  largely  in  the  influence  of  certain  European  writers  who 
were  endeavoring  to  develop  a  new  philosophy  of  the  law.  One 
writer  has  summarized  the  new  movement  among  theorists  in  a 
brief  manner  which  may  bear  repetition: 

In  the  domain  of  jurisprudence  the  past  thirty  years  has  been  marked  by 
ominous  unrest.  Instead  of  working  out  problems  of  systematization,  con- 
struction, and  application,  leading  jurists  have  been  querying  and  contesting 
the  most  fundamental  doctrines  of  the  theory  of  law.  Stammler  in  Germany, 
Saleilles  and  Charmont  in  France  have  laid  stress  on  the  contrast  between 
positive  law  and  right  law,  the  latter  being  conceived  as  a  modernized  law  of 
nature  sitting  in  judgment  over  the  injustice  and  conventionalism  of  the  rules 

'  Pound,  "The  End  of  Law  as  Developed  in  Legal  Rules  and  Doctrines,"  Harvard 
Law  Review,  XXVII,  195-234;  "The  Need  of  Sociological  Jurisprudence,"  Green  Bag, 
October,  1907,  p.  i. 

'"The  Scope  and  Purpose  of  Sociological  Jurisprudence,"  Harvard  Law  Revirai, 
XXIV,  591;  XXV,  140,  489;  "Justice  According  to  Law,"  California  Law  Review, 
XIII,  696;  XIV,  103;  and  other  articles. 

J  The  Evolution  of  Law  Series. 

^  "Hours  of  Labor  and  Realism,"  Harvard  Law  Review,  XXIX,  353;  "The 
Constitutional  Opinions  of  Justice  Holmes,"  ibid.,  XXIX,  683. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY"     741 

imposed  by  the  courts.  Duguit  maintained  that  it  is  idle  to  speak  of  the  State 
as  the  subject  of  rights  and  that  altogether  there  is  no  such  thing  as  rights  in 
distinction  from  organized  social  functions  and  services.  American  teachers 
of  law  [Pound  and  Wigmore  are  referred  to  in  a  footnote]  insisted  on  the 
necessity  of  establishing  the  closest  connection  between  jurisprudence  and 
sociology.  Continental  lawyers  hke  Geny  and  Biilow  traced  the  barrenness 
of  modern  judicial  practice  to  the  slavish  respect  for  terms  and  logical  deduc- 
tions and  demanded  a  free  interpretation  and  application  of  juridical  rules  by 
judges  attentive  to  the  varied  expressions  of  public  opinions  and  public  needs.' 

To  attempt  to  trace  out  the  extent  to  which  the  newer  spirit  has 
permeated  the  teaching  of  law  in  the  law  schools  of  the  country 
would  constitute  a  study  in  itself.  It  seems  to  offer  one  of  the 
most  fertile  fields  for  the  application  of  the  group  view,  which  has 
become  the  tendency  in  contemporary  sociology.  Jurisprudence, 
in  spite  of  hopeful  tendencies,  still  remains  to  be  rejuvenated  with 
the  spirit  of  the  scientific  age  which  has  opened  up  so  rapidly 
since  the  middle  of  the  past  century.  To  transform  the  law  into 
a  means  rather  than  an  end,  to  make  it  an  experimental  hypothe- 
sis whose  validity  is  to  be  determined  by  its  function  and  its  results, 
to  make  the  courts  social  experts  with  adequate  machinery  for 
the  measurement  and  testing  and  observation  of  the  experiments 
made,  to  insure  decisions  on  the  basis  of  the  results  achieved,  are 
some  of  the  problems  left  for  the  twentieth  century.  One  of  the 
keys  to  an  adequate  performance  of  these  tasks  is  the  group  con- 
cept, resting  on  an  adequate  social  psychology. 

One  further  general  comment  on  the  significance  of  the  newer 
point  of  view  in  sociology,  which  we  have  tried  to  point  out,  is  the 
hopeful  outlook  it  gives  to  the  problem  of  social  control.  The 
coming  of  a  point  of  view  which  recognizes  that  the  group  actually 
creates  its  own  persons  means  much  to  a  society  which  finds  itself 
face  to  face  with  increasing  demands  for  readjustment  and  progress. 
To  assume  the  individual  as  given,  and  as  prior  to  the  group,  is  to 
assume  the  futility  of  much  effort  toward  the  remaking  of  society 
or  the  modification  of  social  institutions.  With  the  newer  point 
of  view,  the  problem  of  social  control  becomes  not  merely  one  of 
the  manipulation  of  ready  made  individuals  nor  the  assistance  in 

'  Vinogradoff,  "Crisis  of  Modern  Jurisprudence,"  Yale  Law  Journal,  XXIX 
(1920),  312. 


742  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

helping  ready-made  minds  to  unfold,  but  it  becomes  the  very 
positive  one  of  creating  the  conditions  under  which  and  by  which 
the  type  of  mind  or  self  that  is  desired  is  created.  The  real  prob- 
lem of  social  control  is  creation.  Dewey  has  stated  the  matter  so 
clearly  that  it  is  worth  while  to  repeat  his  statements.  In  showing 
the  need  for  social  psychology  he  points  out  that  the  historical 
method, 

in  spite  of  all  the  proof  of  past  change  which  it  adduces,  will  remain  in  effect  a 
bulwark  of  conservatism.  For  ....  it  reduces  the  role  of  mind  to  that  of 
beholding  and  recording  the  operations  of  man  after  they  have  happened. 
The  historic  method  may  give  emotional  inspiration  or  consolation  in  arousing 
the  belief  that  a  lot  more  changes  are  still  to  happen,  but  it  does  not  show  man 
how  his  mind  is  to  take  part  in  giving  these  changes  one  direction  rather  than 
another.' 

The  chief  source  of  reliance  of  the  conservative  attitude  toward 
progress  is  the  conception  of  mind  as  a  datum  rather  than  a 
creation : 

The  ultimate  refuge  of  the  standpatter  in  every  field,  education,  religion, 
politics,  industrial  and  domestic  life,  has  been  the  notion  of  an  alleged  fixed 
structure  of  mind.  As  long  as  mind  is  conceived  as  an  antecedent  and  ready- 
made  thing,  institutions  and  customs  may  be  regarded  as  its  offspring.  By  its 
own  nature  the  ready-made  mind  works  to  produce  them  as  they  have  existed 
and  now  exist.  There  is  no  use  in  kicking  against  necessity.  The  most  f>ower- 
ful  apologetics  for  any  arrangement  of  institution  is  the  conception  that  it  is 
an  inevitable  result  of  fixed  conditions  of  human  nature.^ 

On  the  other  hand,  if  one  recognizes  the  results  of  the  group 
approach  to  the  problem  of  progress  with  its  implications  in  the 
shape  of  the  mind  as  a  created  thing  in  group  relations,  then  the 
heart  of  the  conservative  reliance  upon  the  fixity  of  human  nature 
is  taken  away: 

If  mind,  in  any  definite  concrete  sense  of  that  word,  is  an  offspring  of  the 
life  of  association,  intercourse,  transmission,  and  accumulation  rather  than  a 
ready-made  antecedent  cause  of  these  things,  then  the  attitude  of  polite  aloof- 
ness or  condescending  justification  as  to  social  institutions  has  its  nerve  cut, 
and  with  this  the  intellectual  resources  of  sanctified  conservatism  disappear.' 

The  significance  of  this  new  point  of  view  in  relation  to  human 
progress  has  been  so  well  stressed  in  different  writings  that  it  is 

'  "The  Need  for  Social  Psychology,"  Psychological  Review,  XXIV,  274. 
'  Ibid.,  p.  273.  3  Ibid.,  p.  274. 


GROUP  CONCEPT  IN  WARD'S  "DYNAMIC  SOCIOLOGY''    743 

hardly  necessary  to  refer  to  it  further.  Todd  has  made  the  modi- 
fiability  of  human  nature  the  central  basis  for  his  treatment  of  the 
problem  of  human  progress.  The  concept  of  a  social  self,  that  is, 
the  self  as  a  group  product,  as  recently  developed  makes  possible 
the  reconstruction  of  educational  methods  and  the  direction  of 
social  development  in  a  way  not  dreamed  of  by  previous  genera- 
tions. As  Todd  says,  ''sociology  and  social  psychology  declare 
in  no  uncertain  terms  that  the  sense  of  self  is  a  social  product  and 
should  indicate  how  self  may  be  controlled,  moulded,  colored,  and 
adapted  for  human  welfare  and  progress."^ 

Just  a  word  should  be  said  of  the  relation  of  the  new  point  of 
view  to  the  field  of  education.  Education  becomes,  from  this 
standpoint,  the  chief  method  of  social  control.  The  group  or 
social  approach  to  the  aims  and  methods  of  education  seems  to 
be  one  of  the  prevailing  emphases  in  that  field.  The  increasing 
number  of  writers  dealing  with  the  problem  of  social  education 
and  the  close  harmony  that  has  arisen  between  the  sociologist  and 
the  educator  is  indicative  of  the  recognition  of  the  newer  approach 
to  the  problem.  The  field  is  so  broad  and  is  attracting  such  atten- 
tion among  educators  that  mere  reference  to  it  is  all  that  can 
be  made  here.^ 

»  Theories  of  Social  Progress,  p.  9.  This  book  is  a  very  able  presentation  of  the 
relation  of  the  conception  of  the  self  as  a  social  product  to  progress.  Robinson's 
The  New  History,  chap,  viii,  presents  a  very  valuable  discussion  of  the  relation  of 
history  to  conser\^atism.  He  develops  the  same  thought  given  above,  that  human 
nature  is  modifiable,  the  self  is  created  by  the  group,  and  points  out  with  this  new 
conception  coming  to  the  front  the  conservative's  chief  reliance  is  being  taken  from 
him.     See  also  Hocking,  Human  Nature  and  Its  Remaking. 

'  Dewey's  Democracy  and  Education  is  an  epoch-making  discussion  of  the  prin- 
ciples involved  in  this  connection.  Smith's  Social  Education  is  an  excellent  example 
of  the  application  of  the  group  approach  to  the  educational  field.  It  serves  as  an 
illustration  of  the  above  \'iew. 


EDUCATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK' 


JESSE  F.  STEINER 
Director  of  Educational  Service,  American  Red  Cross,  Washington,  D.C. 


VII.      THE  SOCIAL-WORK  LABORATORY 

The  practice  work  with  social  agencies,  which  has  been  the 
dominating  type  of  field  work  in  training  courses  for  social  workers, 
is  sometimes  compared  with  the  clinical  experience  of  medical 
students.  If  this  analogy  is  permissible  (and  it  certainly  is  in  a 
general  way)  the  question  at  once  arises  as  to  the  advisability  of 
using  this  type  of  field  work  in  the  early  part  of  the  training  course. 
Is  it  sound  educational  procedure  to  launch  students  out  on  their 
training  course  in  social  work  by  giving  them  field  work  with  a 
social  agency  where  they  will  almost  at  once  become  involved  in 
problems  of  social  treatment? 

On  the  other  hand  where  can  students  get  an  introduction  to 
social  problems  that  surpasses  that  gained  through  work  with  so- 
cial agencies?  There  can  be  no  social-work  laboratory  comparable 
to  the  bacteriological  or  physiological  laboratory  where  social  prob- 
lems and  conditions  can  be  segregated,  apart  from  real  life,  and  made 
the  subject  of  various  experiments.  In  studying  the  social  effects 
of  bad  housing  or  of  unwholesome  family  life  we  cannot  use  methods 
comparable  to  those  employed  in  studying  a  tumor  removed  from  a 
diseased  body.  Data  concerning  these  social  problems  can  be 
gathered  together  and  utilized  for  the  purposes  of  social  research, 
but  even  this  may  not  be  of  great  value  as  a  preparation  for  clinical 
instruction  if  these  problems  are  dealt  with  in  an  abstract  way 
apart  from  their  original  setting.  The  laboratory  of  the  student  of 
social  work  cannot  be  built  up  in  the  seclusion  of  academic  walls. 
It  must  be  found  where  people  are  actively  engaged  in  tr\'ing  to  find 
a  solution  to  the  problems  of  human  association.  Since  social 
agencies  represent  organized  efforts  to  deal  with  the  problems  in 
which  social  workers  are  chiefly  interested  we  are  right  in  looking 

'Copyright,  1921,  by  the  University  of  Chicago  Press. 

744 


EDUCATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK  745 

to  them  for  a  large  part  of  the  field  work  that  enters  into  the  training 
program. 

But  this  conclusion  by  no  means  justifies  the  too-common 
failure  to  realize  the  necessity  for  field-work  activities  that  would 
constitute  a  logical  preparation  for  more  difficult  tasks  of  social 
organization  and  treatment.  While  it  is  not  possible  because  of  the 
nature  of  social  work  to  have  an  experimental  social-work  labora- 
tory where  beginning  students  could  get  their  first  experience  with- 
out elements  of  social  risk,  the  situation  could  at  least  be  partly 
met  by  differentiating  between  field  work  in  which  the  emphasis  is 
primarily  upon  social  facts  and  the  field  work  that  is  chiefly  inter- 
ested in  changing  social  conditions.  Broadly  speaking,  social  re- 
search and  social  treatment  represent  two  types  of  field  work  that 
might  be  for  practical  purposes  assigned  respectively  to  the  social- 
work  laboratory  and  the  social-work  clinic.  In  the  former,  em- 
phasis is  upon  field  work  which  involves  the  collection,  tabulation, 
and  interpretation  of  social  data.  This  of  course  is  by  no  means 
limited  to  an  analysis  of  second-hand  facts.  The  material  for 
study  should  be  secured  as  far  as  possible  by  actual  work  in  the 
field  which  would  give  a  first-hand  acquaintance  with  social 
conditions. 

The  social  work  clinic,  on  the  other  hand,  has  to  do  with  social 
adjustments.  Clinical  experience  involves  diagnosis  and  treat- 
ment. Its  emphasis  is  upon  people  and  the  solution  of  their  social 
problems  rather  than  upon  knowledge  of  social  facts.  While  as  a 
matter  of  course  it  must  continually  make  use  of  the  tools  of  social 
research  and  therefore  overlaps  somewhat  this  field,  its  purpose  is 
suflaciently  distinct  to  make  field-work  activities  of  this  type  stand 
out  as  a  separate  group. 

It  will  no  doubt  be  generally  agreed  that  the  social-work  labora- 
tory as  thus  defined  has  its  logical  beginning  in  the  field  work  that 
accompanies  the  undergraduate  courses  in  sociology.  Its  simpler 
activities,  designed  for  students  getting  their  first  introduction  to 
this  field,  should  illustrate  normal  social  relationships  and  social 
institutions  instead  of  drawing  attention  to  the  more  striking  facts 
of  social  pathology.  Even  fairly  mature  students  may  have  diffi- 
culty in  visualizing  social  relationships  and  for  this  reason  laboratory 


746  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

work  may  very  well  begin  with  the  use  of  such  simple  devices  as 
diagrams  drawn  by  students  illustrating  their  social  contacts,  the 
sources  of  food  supply  of  a  city,  and  the  social  forces  of  a  com- 
munity. Carefully  directed  visits  should  be  made  to  the  most 
common  social  institutions  that  have  to  do  with  the  daily  normal 
life  of  the  community.  Students'  knowledge  of  these  institutions 
is  likely  to  be  very  superficial  and  they  can  secure  in  this  way 
training  in  methods  of  observ^ation  and  study  of  social  institutions 
which  students  should  possess  before  being  brought  into  contact 
with  agencies  dealing  with  abnormal  conditions.  Illustrative  ma- 
terial should  be  collected  from  the  available  written  sources  so  that 
students  become  famiHar  wdth  methods  of  finding  and  utilizing  the 
data  in  this  field.  Especially  valuable  are  the  tabulation  and  the 
graphical  presentation  of  material  that  form  the  laboratory  work  of 
courses  in  statistics.  As  soon  as  courses  in  social  pathology  are 
taken  up  there  will  be  need  for  investigation  involving  field  study 
of  the  social  problems  discussed  in  the  classroom.  This  to  a  certain 
extent  can  be  carried  on  in  connection  with  social  agencies  but  it 
need  not  be  limited  to  the  facilities  they  have  to  offer.  The  uni- 
versity ought  to  maintain  independently  its  own  arrangements  for 
different  types  of  field  studies  adapted  to  the  needs  of  students  in 
the  various  courses  that  are  presented.  In  this  way  the  university 
is  not  only  making  available  properly  correlated  field  work  for  its 
undergraduate  students  in  sociology,  but  is  la}dng  a  secure  foundation 
for  the  work  of  the  graduate  students  in  the  field  of  social  research. 
Graduate  schools  of  social  work  ought  to  be  able  to  take  for 
granted  that  the  students  who  apply  for  admission  have  been  trained 
in  laboratory  work  of  the  types  that  have  just  been  outlined.  Un- 
fortunately by  no  means  all  of  them  have  been  so  trained.  College 
graduates  who  decide  to  enter  schools  of  social  work  have  not  always 
made  social  science  their  major  subject  or  they  may  have  studied 
in  institutions  where  the  equipment  in  this  field  was  very  meager. 
When  we  include  also  those  who  for  one  reason  or  another  are 
admitted  to  graduate  schools  of  social  work  without  a  college 
degree,  it  is  evident  that  a  considerable  proportion  of  their  students 
have  not  had  even  elementary  laboratory  experience  in  the  field  in 
which  they  wish  to  specialize. 


EDUCATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK  747 

It  certainly  is  not  in  accord  with  the  best  educational  procedure 
to  plunge  students  who  lack  this  preliminary  training  into  field  work 
with  social  agencies  where  the  students'  attention  is  directed  at 
once  to  problems  of  social  treatment.  Miss  Edith  Abbott  in  a 
recent  discussion  of  the  field  work  of  the  Chicago  School  of  Civics 
and  Philanthropy  describes  in  the  following  manner  the  difficult 
tasks  that  confront  students  who  are  assigned  field  work  with 
family  welfare  agencies: 

I  have  already  pointed  out  that "  case-work  "  is  the  backbone  of  all  our  field 
work  training.  In  this  work  the  student  is  brought  face  to  face  with  the  deep, 
inevitable,  heart-searching  and  heart-breaking  problems  of  human  life — the 
problem  of  the  deserting  husband  and  the  deserted  wife,  the  feeble-minded 
child,  the  problem  of  parents  immoral  and  degenerate  beyond  any  thinking,  the 
problem  of  homes  so  degraded  in  their  filth  that  they  can  hardly  be  discussed. 
Not  only  must  thfese  problems  of  low  living  be  dealt  with,  but  there  remain 
the  even  more  difficult  questions  of  what  to  do  with  the  kindly  and  affectionate 
but  weak-willed  and  drunken  father,  the  well-meaning  but  incompetent  and 
subnormal  mother;  the  social  worker  must  face  them  all,  "hunger,  drunken- 
ness, brutality,  and  crime"  and  all  the  manifold  problems  of  depravity  and 
distress. 1 

Miss  Abbott  arrives  at  the  very  sound  conclusion  that  field  work 
of  this  t^-pe  is  not  suitable  for  the  immature  undergraduate  who  can 
give  only  a  few  hours  of  his  time  a  week  to  the  social  agency  direct- 
ing his  work.  In  view  of  the  complex  nature  of  the  social  problems 
described  it  would  seem  justifiable  to  go  a  step  farther  and  conclude 
that  such  field  work  does  not  constitute  the  most  logical  beginning 
of  the  training  course  of  even  the  professional  student.  This  con- 
clusion of  course  is  directly  contrary  to  the  traditional  procedure 
of  the  schools  of  social  work  which  have  not  only  made  case  work 
the  "backbone"  of  their  field-work  training,  but  have  regarded  it 
as  the  first  step  toward  an  understanding  of  social  problems.  The 
Pennsylvania  School  for  Social  Service  has  recently  decided  to  give 
even  more  than  usual  emphasis  to  this  field  work  in  the  beginning 
of  their  training  course.  According  to  their  plan  the  course  begins 
with  a  seven  weeks'  field-work  period  with  the  Society  for  Organ- 
izing Charity  in  which   the  full   time  of  the  student  is  divided 

1  Miss  Edith  Abbott,  Field  Work  Training  unth  Social  Agencies.  In  report  of 
Committee  on  Field  Work  of  the  Association  of  Urban  Universities,  at  New  York,  1917. 


748  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

between  field  work  (including  group  and  individual  conferences  with 
the  supervisors  of  field  work)  and  the  class  in  social  case  work. 

To  take  the  place  of  this  early  emphasis  upon  clinical  work,  the 
suggestion  is  here  made  that  following  the  custom  in  medical 
schools,  field  work  of  the  laboratory  type  should  be  utilized  as  the 
introductory,  practical  work  of  the  training  course.  It  is  not  con- 
tended that  the  usual  laboratory  work  in  connection  with  the 
undergraduate  courses  in  sociology,  is  adapted  to  the  needs  of 
students  beginning  their  professional  course.  The  exact  nature  of 
the  field-work  activities  that  should  be  included  within  this  social- 
work  laboratory  would  be  determined  partly  by  the  location  of  the 
school  and  the  branches  of  social  work  in  which  it  desired  to 
specialize. 

In  general  the  use  of  social  data  found  in  pamphlets,  reports,  and 
periodicals  would  constitute  the  first  part  of  such  laboratory  work. 
Material  bearing  upon  a  definite  problem  can  be  collected  from  avail- 
able written  sources,  tabulated  and  illustrated  by  means  of  graphs, 
diagrams,  or  maps.  Family  case  records  and  records  of  community 
work  can  be  studied  and  analyzed  for  the  purpose  of  throwing  light 
on  the  social  problems  with  which  they  deal.  The  social-work 
laboratory  should  have  its  own  collection  of  case  records,  but  these 
ought  to  be  supplemented  if  possible  by  getting  access  to  the  files 
of  social  agencies  where  thoroughgoing  studies  can  be  made  of 
specific  problems. 

As  a  next  step  the  students  can  carry  on  similar  studies  of 
material  secured  through  their  own  field  work.  In  making  these 
field  studies  the  emphasis  should  be  upon  acquiring  a  knowledge  of 
the  community  rather  than  upon  the  discovery  of  means  for  its 
improvement.  Furthermore,  the  knowledge  sought  is  not  merely 
facts  that  easily  lend  themselves  to  statistical  tabulation.  Students 
should  be  trained  to  analyze  a  community  from  the  standpoint  of 
the  habits  and  customs  of  the  people,  their  mental  attitudes  and 
sentiments  and  their  reactions  to  their  environment.  Out  of  such 
study  should  come  not  merely  a  fundamental  knowledge  of  com- 
munity problems;  the  student  should  also  acquire  a  mind  trained 
to  see  and  appraise  properly  the  essential  facts  that  determine  the 
nature  and  quality  of  community  life. 


EDUCATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK  749 

The  question  may  be  raised  as  to  the  possibility  of  using  a  com- 
munity for  such  a  purpose  year  after  year.  The  school  located  in 
a  large  city  would  not  be  seriously  troubled  by  this  problem  because 
of  the  immense  number  of  neighborhoods  within  the  city  and 
adjacent  territory.  Even  in  the  smaller  communities  there  ought 
to  be  no  serious  difficulty  because  the  field  studies  are  by  no  means 
thoroughgoing  surveys  designed  to  expose  the  weaknesses  of  com- 
munity Hfe.  The  studies  need  not  always  involve  a  house  to  house 
canvas  or  the  securing  of  information  from  pubUc  officials.  The 
important  thing  is  to  have  a  proper  approach  to  the  community 
either  through  an  understanding  with  the  people  or  through  an 
assignment  of  work  to  the  students  that  is  recognized  as  necessary 
by  the  public.  The  Massachusetts  State  College  of  Agriculture 
secured  field  work  for  its  students  by  frankly  telhng  the  farmers 
in  the  vicinity  that  the  students  needed  practical  field-work  train- 
ing and  by  asking  them  to  consider  their  communities  as  a  part  of  the 
college  laboratory.  The  students  in  the  School  of  PubHc  Welfare 
of  the  University  of  North  Carolina  gained  access  to  the  communi- 
ties they  wished  to  study  by  being  appointed  school  enumerators. 
If  care  and  tact  are  used,  this  part  of  the  social- work  laboratory 
ought  to  offer  increased  facilities  for  field  work  as  experience  is 
gained  in  making  them  available. 

The  amount  of  time  that  should  be  given  to  field  work  of  this 
kind  must  depend  to  a  large  extent  upon  the  length  of  the  training 
course  and  the  intellectual  and  practical  equipment  of  the  students. 
It  would  seem  hardly  possible  to  give  the  average  student  even 
elementary  training  in  social  research  in  less  than  three  or  four 
months  of  classroom  study  and  field  work.  In  this  period  of  time 
he  ought  to  have  acquired  a  point  of  view  and  a  habit  of  mind  that 
would  enable  him  to  grasp  more  quickly  the  technique  needed  in 
his  cHnical  work.  His  experience  in  social  research  would  of  course 
not  cease  at  this  point.  It  would  be  inextricably  bound  up  with 
all  his  later  field  work  no  matter  in  which  branch  of  social  work 
he  decides  to  specialize.  And  because  of  the  emphasis  upon  training 
in  methods  of  social  research  at  the  beginning  of  his  course  he  is 
in  a  better  position  to  gain  a  clear  insight  into  the  social  problems 
with  which  he  must  deal  in  his  clinical  field  work. 


750  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

VIII.      THE   SOCL\L-WORK   CLINIC 

It  has  already  been  indicated  that  the  usual  types  of  field  work 
carried  on  in  connection  with  social  agencies  may  very  properly  be 
compared  with  the  cHnical  experience  of  medical  students.  This 
practice  work  in  deahng  with  actual  problems  is  of  fundamental 
importance  in  professional  education.  It  is  a  commonplace  in 
education  that  training  is  secured,  not  by  looking  on,  but  by  doing. 
Education  for  social  work  requires  adequate  clinical  facihties  where 
students  closely  supervised  can  engage  in  tasks  under  conditions 
that  approximate  those  they  will  face  when  they  have  entered  upon 
their  professional  career.  The  emphasis  upon  academic  attain- 
ments or  upon  ability  in  social  research  must  not  be  at  the  expense 
of  the  cHnical  side  of  the  training  course.  Schools  of  social  work 
should  not  turn  out  graduates  whose  approach  to  social  problems 
is  primarily  academic.  Social  workers  are  expected  not  only  to 
understand  conditions,  but  to  practice  an  art. 

Their  training  must  be  regarded  as  entirely  inadequate  if  it 
has  not  given  them  familiarity  with  the  technique  of  dealing  with 
social  problems.  A  high  degree  of  technical  skill,  of  course,  cannot 
be  insisted  upon.  This  can  come  only  through  a  much  longer  ex- 
perience than  can  be  gained  wdthin  the  limits  of  a  training  course. 
But  the  graduates  must  have  a  more  thorough  equipment  in 
technique  than  can  be  acquired  by  a  passive  acquaintance  with  the 
work  of  social  agencies.  CHnical  experience,  which  involves  the 
active  participation  of  students  in  organized  efforts  to  deal  with 
social  problems  and  bring  about  their  solution  is  a  fundamental 
part  of  any  training  course  in  social  work. 

In  order  to  enable  students  to  engage  in  this  practice  work,  a 
social-work  clinic  must  be  available.  While  this  clinic  may,  of 
course,  vary  greatly  in  the  type  of  activity  that  is  undertaken,  case 
work  has  quite  generally  been  looked  upon  as  the  most  appropriate 
and  fundamental  practice  work  for  students  of  social  work.  The 
reasons  for  this  are  quite  obvious.  At  the  time  of  the  organization 
of  the  first  schools  of  social  work,  the  charity  organization  societies 
represented  one  of  the  most  aggressive  movements  in  the  social- 
work  field,  and  had  developed  a  case-work  technique  that  was  re- 
garded as  fundamental  in  dealing  with  individual  and  family  social 


EDUCATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK  751 

problems.  Moreover,  graduates  of  schools  of  social  work  found 
their  most  available  opportunities  for  employment  with  case-work 
agencies  and  naturally  felt  the  need  of  specialization  in  this  field. 

But  the  emphasis  upon  clinical  experience  of  this  kind  cannot 
be  attributed  entirely  to  its  accessibility  or  to  the  demand  for 
workers  skilled  in  case  work.  Its  prominent  place  in  the  curricu- 
lum has  been  assured  by  the  fact  that  it  affords  a  ready  means  of 
teaching  concretely  the  scientific  method  of  approach  to  social 
problems.  Through  the  steps  that  must  be  taken  in  the  diagnosis 
of  a  family  situation,  and  the  following  out  of  the  plan  of  treatment 
decided  upon,  students  are  enabled  to  see  the  complex  nature  of 
social  problems  and  learn  how  to  deal  with  them  in  an  orderly 
and  systematic  way.  No  other  type  of  social  work  deals  with  a 
greater  variety  of  social  problems,  so  intermingled  and  compli- 
cated that  they  resist  routine  classification  and  compel  individual 
study  and  treatment.  Intensive  training  with  a  family  welfare 
agency  not  only  acquaints  students  with  a  technique  fundamental 
in  social  work,  but  brings  them  into  intimate  touch  with  the  social 
forces,  both  constructive  and  destructive,  that  enter  into  the  fabric 
of  our  social  life. 

To  such  an  extent  is  this  true,  that  students  are  likely  to 
find  themselves  out  of  their  depth  if  this  clinical  experience  comes 
too  early  in  their  course.  As  a  matter  of  fact,  past  experience 
has  shown  that  immature  students  in  the  case-work  field  frequently 
fail  to  adjust  themselves  to  the  unfamihar  conditions  they  must 
face,  and,  as  a  consequence,  do  work  so  inferior  in  quaUty  that  it  is 
detrimental,  both  to  their  chents  and  to  the  agency  with  which 
they  are  working.  This  brings  up  the  question  as  to  the  advisa- 
bility of  making  case  work  the  first  introduction  to  clinical  experi- 
ence. It  has  already  been  pointed  out  that  clinical  instruction 
should  ordinarily  be  preceded  by  social  research.  Is  it  possible 
to  go  a  step  farther  and  differentiate  between  types  of  cHnical 
work,  in  a  way  that  would  be  helpful  in  arranging  them  in  logical 
sequence? 

Besides  the  case-work  type  of  clinical  experience  which  has 
just  been  discussed,  the  social-work  clinic  should  include  at  least 
two    additional    t\pes    of    activities — social    work    with    groups, 


752  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

and  social  work  with  communities.  Social  work  with  groups  is  a 
type  of  field  work  that  has  been  very  commonly  furnished  by 
social  settlements  or  by  agencies  in  the  recreational  field.  It  in- 
cludes such  activities  as  organizing  and  conducting  boys'  and 
girls'  clubs,  experience  in  playground  supervision,  work  with 
immigrant  groups  involving  the  teaching  of  classes  in  English 
and  civics,  participation  in  the  work  of  the  Young  Men's  Christian 
Association,  Young  Women's  Christian  Association,  Boy  Scouts, 
and  similar  organizations  that  specialize  in  group  activities; 
special  work  with  institutional  groups  in  hospitals,  asylums, 
reformatories,  etc.;   and  certain  phases  of  industrial  welfare  work. 

The  third  type  of  clinical  work — social  work  with  communities, 
or  community  organization — has  to  do  with  the  social  welfare 
of  the  community  as  a  whole,  instead  of  with  that  of  particular 
families  or  groups  within  the  community.  While  community 
work  in  accordance  with  customary  usage  may,  and  frequently 
does,  include  activities  for  groups,  as  is  seen  in  the  work  of  social 
settlements,  playground  associations,  and  community  centers,  the 
two  types  of  work  employ  different  techniques  and  in  a  training 
course  should  be  considered  separately.  The  looseness  with  which 
the  term  "community"  is  now  used  makes  it  inevitable  that 
community  work  should  have  a  varied  meaning.  On  the  one  hand, 
in  the  large  cities,  it  may  designate  the  work  of  settlements  and 
neighborhood  associations;  or  it  may  be  applied  to  the  work  of 
federations  of  social  agencies  that  are  co-ordinating  the  various 
activities  of  separate  agencies  so  that  they  may  serve  best  the 
needs  of  the  whole  community  or  city;  or  again  it  may  take  the 
form  of  the  social  unit  organization,  with  its  special  machinery 
designed  to  utilize  the  abiHty  and  resources  of  the  people  them- 
selves in  meeting  their  own  problems.  These  city  tj-pes  of 
community  work  are  usually  quite  complex  and  involve  diflicult 
problems  of  organization  and  administration. 

On  the  other  hand,  the  community  work,  that  within  recent 
years  has  been  rapidly  developing  in  small  towns  and  rural  com- 
munities, deals  with  a  comparatively  small  social  unit  and  is  more 
simple  in  character.  In  some  cases,  a  single  organization,  such  as 
the  Young  Men's  Christian  Association  or  the  Red  Cross,  adopts 


EDUCATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK  753 

a  wide  community  program  and  furnishes  the  leadership  for  the 
work.  A  more  common  plan  is  to  form  a  community  council 
composed  of  representative  people  who  study  the  situation  from 
the  community  point  of  view  and  endeavor  to  organize  the  various 
social  forces  so  that  they  may  be  utilized  to  the  greatest  advantage. 
In  any  event,  an  essential  thing  in  community  work  is  a  study  of 
the  resources  and  problems  of  the  community  in  order  to  ascertain 
facts  upon  which  to  build  a  satisfactory  program  of  work.  The 
program  itself  may  be  simple,  but  it  must  have  a  long  look  ahead 
and  include  all  the  vital  interests  of  the  community. 

Of  these  three  general  types  of  clinical  activities  that  have  been 
mentioned,  social  work  with  groups  is  the  most  elementary.  It 
demands  sufficient  skill  to  justify  the  requirement  of  practice  work 
under  supervision,  but  it  approximates  so  closely  the  non-professional 
activities  in  the  social-work  field  with  which  students  are  usually 
familiar,  that  they  find  Httle  difficulty  in  adjusting  themselves  to 
the  group  work  assigned  them.  From  this  point  of  view,  it  would 
seem  that  social  work  with  groups  constitutes  an  appropriate  ac- 
tivity with  which  to  begin  clinical  experience.  The  experience  of 
schools  of  social  work,  however,  indicates  that  group  work  possesses 
too  little  educational  value  to  be  given  much  emphasis.  The  more 
simple  group  activities  may  very  properly  be  carried  on  as  field 
work  in  the  undergraduate  curriculum.  With  few  exceptions,  clini- 
cal work  with  groups  will  have  a  very  small  place  in  a  professional 
training  course,  except  in  so  far  as  it  fits  into  activities  in  connec- 
tion with  training  in  community  organization. 

The  question  then  to  be  decided  is  whether  cHnical  practice 
should  begin  with  community  work  or  case  work.  Certainly  all 
would  agree  that  the  more  difficult  problems  of  community  organ- 
ization should  be  postponed  until  the  latter  part  of  the  course. 
Likewise,  case  work  with  families  involving  complicated  situations 
is  field  work  suitable  only  for  more  mature  students.  Whichever 
precedes  in  the  course,  it  is  important  that  the  beginning  be  made 
with  comparatively  simple  situations  that  do  not  compel  the  student 
to  shoulder  heavy  responsibihty.  Since  case-work  with  families 
cannot  be  carried  on  without  a  great  deal  of  knowledge  of  com- 
munity resources  and  underlying  social  forces,  the  case-work  student 


754  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

is  compelled  to  study  his  community  in  connection  with  his  special 
work  with  family  problems.  As  a  matter  of  fact,  the  usual  conten- 
tion is  that,  through  this  family  work,  the  student  gains  a  more 
intelligent  grasp  of  community  problems  than  in  any  other  way. 
On  the  other  hand,  it  may  be  said  that  the  study  and  analysis  of 
the  resources  and  problems  of  a  small  community  (and,  upon  the 
basis  of  the  facts  secured,  the  development  of  a  community  program) 
comprise  field  work  that  will  give  a  better  perspective  to  students  of 
family  welfare,  as  well  as  furnish  them  with  knowledge  that  will 
facihtate  their  dealing  with  family  problems.  It  may  still  further 
be  argued  that  community  work  should  precede  because  it  deals 
chiefly  with  the  normal  elements  of  the  community,  whereas  case 
work  directs  attention  to  the  abnormal  and  pathological. 

In  any  event,  the  recent  development  of  social  work  in  small 
communities  has  made  available  for  clinical  instruction  a  simple 
unit,  which  presents  to  students  an  unexcelled  opportunity  to  see  at 
work  in  more  simple  form  the  social  forces  that  are  hard  to  dis- 
entangle in  the  complex  life  of  the  city.  The  fact  that  this  com- 
munity work  is  not  now  generally  accessible  does  not  justify  the 
little  attention  that  is  paid  to  it  in  schools  of  social  work.  Its  use- 
fulness has  already  been  demonstrated,  and  later  experience  will 
undoubtedly  point  out  its  proper  place  in  the  curriculum. 

The  activities  of  the  social-work  clinic  have  been  divided  into 
three  general  groups,  which,  broadly  speaking,  cover  the  tech- 
niques most  fundamental  in  social  work.  In  the  different  schools 
of  social  work,  there  will  be  considerable  variation  in  the  activities 
of  their  clinics,  depending  upon  the  availability  of  social  agencies 
or  the  abihty  of  the  school  to  provide  its  own  clinical  work.  Any 
school,  however,  that  desires  to  give  a  well-rounded  training  in 
social  work  must  be  able  to  give  the  students  practical  experience 
in  family,  group,  and  community  work.  A  working  knowledge  of 
the  techniques  in  these  three  fields  should  be  required  for  gradua- 
tion. 

If  this  is  made  the  minimum  requirement  of  clinical  work,  the 
curriculum  must  be  arranged  with  this  in  view.  Because  of  the 
time  consumed  by  field  work,  it  is  impracticable  to  have  students 


EDUCATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK  755 

carry  two  field-work  courses  during  one  term.  When  we  take  into 
consideration  the  additional  time  needed  for  the  field  work  in  social 
research,  the  necessity  for  at  least  a  two-year  course  is  apparent. 
Even  in  that  period  of  time,  the  ground  could  not  be  adequately 
covered  unless  much  preliminary  work  had  been  completed  during 
the  regular  college  course.  The  best  solution  seems  to  be  the  five- 
year  undergraduate  and  graduate  course  which  will  make  feasible 
the  completion  of  the  academic  and  practical  work  in  a  thorough 
manner. 

But  even  in  the  best-arranged  curriculum,  there  cannot  be 
suflicient  clinical  experience  to  give  students  a  high  degree  of  skill 
in  the  special  field  they  choose.  Graduates  of  schools  of  social 
work,  just  as  graduates  of  other  professional  schools,  must  plan  to 
gain  skill  and  experience  by  serving  first  in  subordinate  positions. 
The  school  should  attempt  to  give  only  fundamental  training. 
Otherwise  the  curriculum  becomes  so  heavily  weighted  with  clinical 
experience  that  the  training  course  can  offer  few  advantages  beyond 
that  of  a  well-planned  apprenticeship. 

In  a  preceding  section,  attention  was  called  to  the  possibihty 
of  a  school's  having  control  over  its  field-work  faciUties.  As  far 
as  the  clinical  side  of  the  field  work  is  concerned,  it  will  in  many 
cases  be  found  more  convenient  to  utilize  the  estabHshed  social 
agencies.  Whatever  arrangement  may  be  made  for  clinical  prac- 
tice, it  is  essential  that  the  school  should  have  entire  direction  of 
the  clinical  instruction.  The  traditional  method  of  securing  the 
cHnical  staff  has  been  to  rely  largely  upon  the  services  of  workers 
employed  by  social  agencies.  This  has  been  justified  by  the  fact 
that  students  have  the  advantage  of  learning  their  technique 
from  persons  in  intimate  touch  with  the  methods  followed  in 
social  work. 

Directly  opposed  to  this  point  of  view  is  the  statement  of 
Dr.  Frankfurter,  quoted  above  in  another  connection,  in  which  he 
said:  "The  time  has  gone  by  when  the  teaching  of  any  profession 
can  be  entrused  to  persons  who,  from  their  exacting  outside  work 
of  practice  or  administration,  give  to  teaching  their  tired  leavings." 
In  the  introduction  to  the  report  on  medical  education  in  Europe, 


756  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

issued  by  the  Carnegie  Foundation,  Dr.  Henry  S.  Pritchett,  Presi- 
dent of  the  Foundation,  emphasizes  this  same  point  as  it  applies 
to  the  instruction  of  medical  students.     Says  Dr.  Pritchett: 

It  has  come  to  be  generally  conceded  that  not  only  must  the  basic  sciences  of 
chemistry,  physics,  and  biology  be  taught  by  those  who  are  primarily  teachers 
and  who  give  their  whole  time  to  teaching  and  to  research,  but  also  that  the 
more  definitely  medical  sciences  of  anatomy,  physiology,  pathology,  and 
bacteriology  must  be  represented  by  specialists.  It  has  not  been  so  generally 
granted  that  the  clinical  teacher  must  also  be  primarily  a  man  who  devotes  his 
life  to  teaching  and  to  research.  This  reform  is  the  next  great  step  to  be  taken 
in  the  improvement  of  medical  education  in  the  United  States  and  Great 
Britain.  In  Germany  only  has  it  heretofore  found  recognition,  and  to  this 
fact,  next  to  the  development  of  an  orderly  and  efficient  system  of  secondary 
schools,  is  to  be  attributed  the  high  level  of  German  medical  science  and 
medical  teaching.  With  the  more  general  acceptation  of  the  view  that  medical 
education  is  education,  not  a  professional  incident,  the  conception  of  the  clinical 
teacher  must  undergo  the  change  here  alluded  to.  The  teaching  of  clinical 
medicine  and  surgery  will  then  cease  to  be  a  side  issue  in  the  life  of  a  busy  prac- 
titioner; it  wiU  propose  to  itself  the  same  objects  and  conform  to  the  same 
standards  and  ideals  as  the  teaching  of  any  other  subject  of  equal  importance. 

In  the  field  of  education  for  social  work,  only  a  small  beginning 
has  been  made  in  providing  an  adequate  permanent  staff  to  have 
charge  of  the  clinical  instruction.  Usually  the  responsibility  for 
the  supervision  of  field  work  is  placed  upon  one  person,  who,  un- 
aided by  assistants,  is  compelled  to  turn  over  a  large  part  of  the 
practical  training  of  the  students  to  members  of  the  staffs  of  social 
agencies.  If  the  field  work  is  a  fundamental  part  of  the  course,  as 
is  generally  claimed,  it  would  seem  that  its  actual  supervision 
should  not  be  delegated  to  persons  who  are  only  indirectly  under 
the  control  of  the  school.  In  several  of  the  newer  university  schools 
of  social  work  located  in  places  where  skilled  social  workers  are  not 
employed,  it  has  been  found  necessary  to  maintain  their  own  staff 
of  field-work  supervisors.  While  this  is  a  new  departure  in  schools 
of  social  work,  it  is  a  step  in  line  with  the  best  procedure  in  other 
fields  of  professional  education. 


EDUCATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK  757 

IX.      RECENT  DEVELOPMENTS   IN  PREPARATION  FOR   RURAL 
SOCIAL   WORK 

The  country-life  movement  during  recent  years  has  been  char- 
acterized by  a  growing  tendency  to  lay  stress  upon  the  social  aspects 
of  life  in  rural  communities.  It  is  no  longer  believed  that  rural 
programs  are  serving  their  full  purpose  when  they  are  dealing  with 
the  problem  of  increased  production.  There  has  come  about,  partly 
as  an  aftermath  of  the  war,  a  more  general  recognition  of  the  social 
ills  of  the  countryside  which  are  retarding  its  steps  toward  economic 
progress.  The  rural  leader  must  know  more  than  how  to  make  the 
farm  more  productive;  he  must  know  how  to  make  community 
life  more  wholesome  and  attractive. 

This  new  emphasis  upon  rural  social  problems  has  necessarily 
drawn  attention  to  the  need  of  supplementing  the  usual  equipment 
of  rural  workers  such  as  farm  bureau  and  home  demonstration 
agents,  rural  school  teachers  and  rural  public  health  nurses,  so 
that  they  will  enter  their  work  with  a  vision  of  its  social  possibiHties 
and  be  familiar  with  the  methods  common  to  social  work.  More- 
over, the  recent  experience  of  the  Red  Cross,  the  county  work  of 
the  Young  Men's  Christian  Association,  the  county  welfare  work  in 
North  CaroHna,  as  well  as  that  of  other  agencies,  both  public  and 
private,  have  demonstrated  that  there  is  a  real  opportunity  in  rural 
communities  for  leaders  who  are  prepared  to  give  their  whole  time 
to  problems  of  rural  organization  and  social  work. 

The  movement  to  provide  the  training  facilities  adapted  to  these 
needs  has  already  begun  to  take  definite  shape.  Universities  and 
agricultural  colleges  are  offering  courses  in  applied  sociology  in 
which  special  emphasis  is  given  to  methods  of  meeting  rural  social 
problems.  The  Springfield  Young  Men's  Christian  Association 
Training  School  has  an  arrangement  with  the  Massachusetts'^State 
College  of  Agriculture,  whereby  students  in  preparation  for  county 
work  spend  one  year  in  the  study  of  rural  subjects  at  the  latter 
institution.  The  Boston  School  of  Social  Work  is  endeavoring" to 
work  out  a  similar  co-operative  plan  of  study  for  its  students  who 
desire  to  prepare  for  rural  social  work.  Several  colleges  and  uni- 
versities located  in  small  towns  are  co-operating  with  the  Red  Cross 


758  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

in  developing  training  courses  specially  designed  for  social  workers 
in  small  towns  and  rural  communities. 

It  is  but  natural  that  these  efforts  to  carry  on  training  courses 
outside  of  large  cities  should  be  regarded  with  considerable  mis- 
giving by  those  accustomed  to  look  to  the  city  for  field-work 
facilities.  A  legitimate  question  to  ask  is  whether  rural  and  village 
Hfe  with  its  small  population,  its  difficulty  of  access  from  the  train- 
ing center,  the  small  number  of  cases  that  can  be  available  in  any 
particular  locality,  and  its  lack  of  well-equipped  social  agencies, 
can  be  made  to  furnish  a  satisfactory  training  ground  for  social 
workers.  While  the  burden  of  proof  must  rest  upon  those  who 
have  departed  from  the  traditional  methods,  it  must  be  remembered 
that  experimental  work  of  this  kind  requires  considerable  time  be- 
fore its  results  can  be  adequately  tested.  It  is  too  early  now  to 
draw  anything  more  than  tentative  conclusions  from  the  compara- 
tively few  significant  efforts  that  have  been  made  to  train  for  rural 
social  work. 

Without  doubt  the  recent  efforts  to  develop  rural  training  cen- 
ters have  grown  out  of  a  recognition  of  the  different  environments 
faced  by  rural  and  city  social  workers.  These  differences  in  envi- 
ronment of  course  affect  other  professional  groups,  although  not  as 
profoundly  as  they  do  those  whose  work  is  concerned  with  problems 
that  are  so  intimately  bound  up  with  the  social  and  economic  life 
of  the  people.  The  rural  physician  will  not  have  convenient  access 
to  hospitals  and  specialists  and  to  this  extent  he  will  be  handi- 
capped in  his  work,  but  the  technique  of  the  treatment  of  disease 
or  injury  does  not  need  to  be  modified  in  accord  with  social  customs 
or  conditions  of  living.  In  the  teaching  profession  the  value  of 
special  training  for  rural  teachers  is  more  apparent  and  fortunately 
is  now  quite  generally  recognized.  The  rural  school  cannot  attain 
its  highest  efficiency  unless  its  curriculum  and  methods  are  deter- 
mined by  the  needs  of  the  country  rather  than  by  those  of  the  city. 
Especially  significant  are  the  recent  efforts  to  provide  training 
courses  adapted  to  the  needs  of  the  rural  ministry.  In  this  case  the 
purpose  in  view  is  not  merely  to  give  the  minister  a  practical 
knowledge  of  rural  problems  and  a  sympathetic  understanding  of 
the  habits  of  life  and  thought  of  rural  people;   it  is  also  to  develop 


EDUCATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK  759 

a  love  for  the  country  and  to  give  such  a  vision  of  opportunities  for 
far-reaching  rural  service  that  it  would  not  be  regarded  as  a 
stepping-stone  to  a  city  pastorate. 

The  dearth  of  professional  men  and  women  in  small  towns  and 
rural  communities  who  look  upon  their  work,  there  as  an  end  in 
itself  and  not  as  a  means  of  advancement  to  a  city,  has  been  one 
of  the  great  hindrances  to  rural  progress.  For  this  attitude  of 
mind  the  professional  schools  in  the  cities  are  largely  responsible, 
for,  either  consciously  or  unconsciously,  the  rural  students  acquire 
the  city  point  of  view  and  find  themselves  out  of  sympathy  with  the 
more  conservative  and  slow-moving  community  from  which  they 
came  and  where  they  had  expected  to  return  to  work. 

In  the  city  schools  of  social  work  this  acquirement  by  the 
students  of  city  ideals  seems  inevitable  and  is  especially  disastrous 
from  the  point  of  view  of  the  development  of  rural  social  agencies. 
Social  workers  who  have  been  trained  in  a  city  where  well-equipped 
agencies  are  readily  accessible  have  reason  to  feel  lost  when  later 
they  accept  a  position  where  social  work  is  not  highly  organized. 
If  they  do  not  soon  become  discouraged  by  the  conditions  con- 
fronting them  and  feel  too  keenly  their  isolation  from  other  social 
workers,  they  are  likely  to  urge  the  adoption  of  methods  more 
appHcable  to  the  city  than  to  the  small  town  and  thus  alienate  the 
support  of  their  constituency. 

For  these  reasons  many  have  concluded  that  the  successful 
development  of  rural  social  work  is  dependent  upon  the  possibihty 
of  estabhshing  rural  training  courses  that  will  definitely  prepare 
for  social  work  in  small  communities  and  give  such  a  vision  of  the 
opportunities  in  this  field  that  people  of  real  abiUty  will  regard  it 
worth  while  to  become  rural  speciahsts. 

Possibly  the  first  serious  attempt  to  train  social  workers  in  a 
small  town  and  rural  environment  was  made  at  Berea  College, 
Kentucky,  in  1919.  This  course,  which  was  six  months  in  length, 
was  carried  on  by  the  College  in  co-operation  with  the  Red  Cross 
and  was  intended  to  prepare  home-service  workers  for  the  Red 
Cross  chapters  in  the  mountain  counties  of  Kentucky. 

For  this  experimental  training  course  in  rural  social  work  Berea 
College  was  admirably  adapted.     Located  in  a  small  village  on  the 


76o  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

edge  of  the  foothills  that  lead  back  into  the  isolated  mountain 
regions,  it  had  within  easy  reach  communities  that  presented  rural 
problems  of  a  serious  and  complicated  nature.  From  these  moun- 
tain communities  came  the  majority  of  the  student  body  whose 
dominating  desire,  fostered  by  the  College,  was  to  carry  back  to 
their  homes  the  knowledge  that  would  increase  the  welfare  of  their 
own  people.  The  College,  as  a  matter  of  fact,  was  engaged  in  social 
work  although  its  activities  were  not  carried  on  under  that  name. 
On  its  teaching  staff  were  men  experienced  in  group  and  com- 
munity work  in  sparsely  settled  rural  sections. 

The  establishment  of  the  training  course  was,  therefore,  a  much 
more  feasible  undertaking  than  it  might  at  first  glance  seem  to  be. 
The  College  furnished  the  proper  setting  for  the  course,  as  well  as  a 
considerable  amount  of  instruction  admirably  suited  to  the  needs 
of  the  students.  With  the  assistance  of  the  personnel  of  the  Lake 
Division  of  the  Red  Cross,  it  was  possible  to  plan  a  well-rounded 
training  course  designed  particularly  for  workers  in  places  where 
social  work  was  not  yet  well  organized. 

The  classroom  work  was  given  under  these  headings :  principles 
of  social  work  in  the  home,  public-health  problems  and  adminis- 
tration, child-welfare  problems  of  rural  communities,  social- 
service  resources  and  how  to  use  them,  organization  and  admin- 
istration of  Red  Cross  work.  The  field  work  to  accompany  these 
courses  was  carried  on  within  the  jurisdiction  of  the  Berea  Red 
Cross  Chapter.  Through  an  arrangement  with  the  chapter  its 
home-service  office  became  the  headquarters  of  the  students.  One 
of  their  first  field-work  activities  was  to  equip  this  office  for  work. 
Desks,  files,  and  all  the  necessary  office  furniture  and  supplies 
were  installed  and  properly  arranged.  State  and  local  maps  show- 
ing matters  of  interest  to  social  workers  were  prepared.  A  directory 
of  the  Berea  community  was  compiled  which  gave  information 
about  churches,  schools,  lodges,  community  clubs,  places  of  business, 
public  officials,  and  professional  people,  such  as  doctors,  la\v>'ers, 
nurses,  ministers,  and  teachers.  The  two  well-equipped  hospitals 
gave  the  students  practical  training  in  rendering  some  of  the  simple 
services  needed  by  mountain  families  in  time  of  sickness.  The 
home-service  work  among  soldiers'  families  gave  opportunity  for 


EDUCATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK  761 

experience  in  family  case-work.  The  community  field  work  was 
carried  on  in  eight  neighborhoods  or  communities  which  are  included 
within  the  Berea  Chapter.  To  each  of  these  communities  two 
students  were  assigned  for  study  and  service.  The  methods  used 
varied  in  the  different  neighborhoods.  In  Scaffold  Cane  and 
Narrow  Gap  well-organized  community  work  was  in  progress  and 
offered  opportunities  to  the  students  to  participate  in  their  activities. 
Two  other  districts  were  approached  through  the  Sunday 
schools.  The  students  organized  and  taught  Sunday-school  classes 
and  through  the  contacts  made  in  this  way  found  a  ready  access 
to  the  homes  of  the  people.  This  enabled  them  to  make  a  study 
of  local  conditions  upon  the  basis  of  which  they  worked  out  plans 
for  community  betterment.  The  experiment  of  family  case  work 
without  any  attempt  at  neighborhood  organization  was  made  in 
one  district.  One  of  the  most  successful  pieces  of  work  was  done 
in  Bobtown  where,  according  to  the  report  of  Professor  E.  L.  Dix, 
the  supervisor  of  field  work, 

sickness  in  the  home  was  used  as  an  entering  wedge  and  a  basis  for  beginning 
service  and  acquaintance.  Contacts  and  friendly  relationships  continued  after 
sickness  had  disappeared.  Especially  in  the  homes  where  there  was  an  evident 
need  for  further  service,  this  relationship  was  continued  as  a  means  of  develop- 
ing a  constructive  plan  to  bring  about  the  necessary  change  in  the  situation. 
Through  this  family  and  friends  of  the  family,  students  became  friends  easily 
with  many  other  families  in  the  neighborhood,  working  with  them  always 
according  to  comprehensive  programs,  as  soon  as  they  had  sufficient  time  to 
develop  them.  When  they  were  thus  on  a  solid  footing  of  confidence  and 
friendship  with  most  of  the  families  of  the  neighborhood,  it  was  easy  to  proceed 
to  a  community  organization  and  to  work  out  for  their  own  guidance  a  com- 
munity plan. 

In  commenting  on  the  results  of  this  field  work  experience 
Professor  Dix  adds: 

No  attempt  will  be  made  to  enumerate  individual  results  obtained  but  a 
few  instances  may  be  mentioned  as  examples:  Many  truant  children  were 
placed  in  school  and  kept  there;  people  who  never  went  to  church  became 
regular  attendants;  at  least  two  persons  unable  to  walk  at  all  were  provided 
with  crutches  and  taught  to  use  them  to  their  great  satisfaction;  several  adult 
illiterates  were  taught  to  read  and  write  and  two  of  these  became  students  in 
the  foundation  school  of  Berea  College;  several  pairs  of  eyes  were  saved  by 
surgical  operations;   some  Sunday  Schools  and  community  organizations  were 


762  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

started;  some  families  were  taught  the  use  of  a  budget  of  household  expenses; 
an  officer  was  appointed  by  the  county  court  to  act  as  guardian  or  adviser  for 
a  family  of  children  whose  mother  was  not  deemed  entirely  the  proper  person 
to  look  after  them;  medical  examination  was  introduced  into  rural  schools; 
soldiers  and  sailors  and  their  families  were  assisted  in  regard  to  their  war-time 
and  post-war-time  difficulties.  Many  other  interesting  things  were  done  but 
lack  of  space  forbids  mentioning  them  here. 

The  experience  gained  through  this  course  seemed  to  demon- 
strate the  possibility  of  giving  practical  training  in  social  work  in 
rural  surroundings.  It  was  found  that  students  could  render  to 
small  communities  services  of  real  value  and  do  this  work  in  such  a 
way  that  their  presence  would  be  welcomed.  Contrary  to  what 
had  been  previously  the  prevailing  opinion,  a  sufficient  number  of 
cases  was  available  for  practice  in  case  work.  The  difficulties  in 
handling  them,  while  many  were  not  insuperable.  The  only 
essential  modifications  in  technique  were  those  which  naturally 
suggested  themselves  to  workers  dealing  with  family  problems 
where  very  few  organized  agencies  can  be  called  upon  to  give 
assistance  and  where  the  neighborhood  fife  is  such  that  impersonal 
or  anonymous  service  is  impossible. 

Another  significant  effort  to  train  rural  social  workers  was  made 
this  past  summer  by  the  new  School  of  Public  Welfare  at  the  Uni- 
versity of  North  CaroHna.  The  territor}'-  adjacent  to  the  village 
of  Chapel  Hill  in  which  the  university  is  located  presented  both  the 
opportunities  and  hindrances  of  a  typically  rural  and  unworked 
environment  and  therefore  seemed  an  appropriate  setting  for  rural 
field-work  training.  Orange  county  has  a  population  of  about 
15,000  all  of  which  is  classed  by  the  census  as  rural.  The  three 
small  hamlets  which  can  be  reached  by  railroads  are  very  similar 
to  those  found  in  most  rural  counties  in  the  South. 

Paid  social  work  was  limited  to  what  could  be  done  by  a  home- 
demonstration  agent,  about  to  be  dismissed;  a  county  farm  agent, 
who  spent  part  of  his  time  on  his  farm;  a  county  superintendent  of 
public  welfare,  who  performed  his  dutues  in  this  position  in  addition 
to  his  work  as  county  superintendent  of  schools;  and  a  Red  Cross 
nurse  in  Chapel  Hill  who  came  just  before  the  course  started  and 
left  while  it  was  in  progress.  In  the  adjoining  county  of  Durham, 
which  was  also  used  for  field  work,  there  were  farm-and-home- 


EDUCATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK  763 

demonstration  agents  as  well  as  a  full-time  county  welfare  superin- 
tendent. 

The  training  course  was  attended  by  two  different  sets  of 
students,  county  welfare  superintendents  and  Red  Cross  students. 
The  former  were  already  employed  and  actively  at  work  and  could 
find  time  for  only  a  six  weeks'  course.  One  of  their  most  pressing 
problems  was  in  connection  with  the  cases  on  their  county  pauper 
lists.  The  supervisor  of  field  work  spent  six  weeks  prior  to  the 
opening  of  the  course  as  nominal  assistant  to  a  county  superin- 
tendent of  public  welfare  in  order  to  obtain  an  intimate  acquaint- 
ance wath  the  conditions  encountered  in  handling  these  problems. 

The  field  work  of  the  public  welfare  students  was  carried  on  in 
connection  with  the  office  of  the  Durham  County  Welfare  Super- 
intendent. Each  student  was  required  to  investigate  and  work  out 
under  supervision  initial  plans  for  treatment  of  two  or  three  dis- 
advantaged families.  To  help  the  students  gain  a  better  apprecia- 
tion of  the  problems  of  institutional  care,  visits  of  observation  were 
made  to  a  large  orphanage  and  to  the  state  hospital.  Prior  to  these 
visits  the  methods  of  such  institutions  were  discussed  and  definite 
subjects  were  assigned  for  special  observation  and  report.  In  view 
of  the  brevity  of  the  course,  no  attempt  was  made  to  give  well- 
rounded  field-work  experience.  It  was  felt  that  in  this  initial  course 
better  results  could  be  secured  by  beginning  with  case  problems 
already  faced  by  the  students  and  giving  them  some  guidance  in 
working  out  a  solution  of  these  cases.  That  the  course  was  of  value 
seems  evident  from  the  fact  that  the  students  are  planning  to  attend 
a  similar  training  course  next  summer.  By  influencing  the  Orange 
County  board  to  employ  a  full-time  superintendent  of  public  wel- 
fare, the  school  has  already  made  a  beginning  in  the  development 
of  a  program  which  will  bring  about  this  coming  year  an  increasing 
number  of  community  activities  in  the  territory  adjacent  to  Chapel 
Hill  in  which  the  students  can  participate. 

The  course  taken  by  the  Red  Cross  students  was  to  cover  a 
period  of  twelve  weeks  and  was  intended  to  prepare  them  for  work 
in  Red  Cross  chapters  where  their  first  and  most  urgent  problem 
would  be  the  building  up  of  an  organization  capable  of  meeting  the 
social  and  health  needs  of  the  small  town  and  open  country.    The 


764  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

emphasis  upon  their  field  work  was  accordingly  placed  on  ac- 
quaintance with  community  situations  and  the  organization  of 
community  forces.  After  consultation  with  the  county  school 
superintendents  of  both  counties,  it  was  decided  to  make  use  of  the 
school  census  as  the  method  of  introduction  to  the  communities. 
Both  superintendents  wrote  letters  of  introduction  and  endorsement 
to  the  chairmen  of  the  school  boards  in  the  districts  chosen. 

Friday  and  Saturday  of  each  week  were  given  over  to  field  work. 
The  students,  by  twos,  went  to  the  school  districts  assigned  them 
and  visited  as  many  homes  as  time  permitted,  usually  walking  from 
house  to  house,  securing  the  information  for  the  school  census  by 
questions,  and  all  kinds  of  family  and  community  information  by 
observation  and  friendly  conversation.  The  districts  differed  in 
area  but  each  included  between  one  hundred  and  one  hundred  and 
fifty  families.  A  very  careful  system  of  weekly  reports  and  con- 
ferences with  the  field-work  supervisors  was  of  great  help  in  check- 
ing up  the  work  of  the  students  and  in  enabling  them  to  appreciate 
the  significance  of  the  conditions  they  found. 

As  their  acquaintance  grew  the  students  were  asked  to  visit 
homes  and  to  attend  parties  and  meetings.  It  was  a  natural  step 
for  local  leaders  to  ask  the  students,  whom  they  had  discovered 
were  interested  in  their  problems,  to  help  in  community  enterprises. 
The  recreational  training  the  students  had  had  through  play  dem- 
onstrations early  in  their  course  was  often  the  easiest  part  of  their 
training  to  use.  A  community  meeting  in  one  neighborhood,  two 
young  people's  parties  in  another — one  of  them  an  occasion  when  a 
society  of  one  church  entertained  that  of  the  rival  church  as  a  step 
toward  church  co-operation — furnished  opportunities  for  recrea- 
tional leadership.  A  boy  in  one  of  the  communities  said  that  the 
young  people  wanted  a  glee  club.  The  student  promised  to  help, 
provided  he  could  get  the  group  together.  The  glee  club  that 
started  in  this  way  included  nearly  thirty  boys  and  girls  and  con- 
tinued to  meet  after  the  student  leader  left  the  community. 

Baby  chnics  in  which  the  students  assisted  the  Red  Cross  nurse, 
were  held  in  two  communities.  A  community  picnic  was  revived 
at  one  place  and  a  speaker  secured  from  the  University.  The 
students  encouraged  the  interest  they  found  in  community  fairs  and 


EDUCATION  FOR  SOCIAL  WORK  765 

met  with  fair  committees  in  three  communities.  Partly,  at  least,  as 
a  result  of  the  students'  efforts  four  fairs  were  held  in  Orange 
County — the  number  required  to  obtain  the  truck  demonstration 
of  home  conveniences  furnished  by  a  state  department. 

Their  e.xperience  with  the  school  census  gave  the  students  a  wide 
though  casual  acquaintance  in  the  districts  visited  and  enabled 
them  to  know  the  local  leaders  and  factions,  which  was  of  value  to 
them  in  planning  for  community  activities.  They  also  had  re- 
vealed to  them  through  their  official  visits  many  family  problems 
that  needed  attention.  In  some  instances,  the  students  investigated 
family  situations  and  worked  out  tentative  plans  of  treatment,  but 
in  most  cases  lack  of  time  made  this  impracticable.  In  addition 
to  their  official  reports  to  the  school  boards,  the  students  submitted 
carefully  written  summaries  of  the  work  done  and  of  the  conditions 
found  in  famihes  and  communities.  These  records  will  be  studied 
by  the  next  class  of  students  who  will  be  guided  by  these  facts  in 
their  attempts  to  carry  on  the  work  that  has  been  begun.  That 
students  can  do  this  work  in  such  a  way  as  to  win  public  approval 
seems  indicated  by  the  fact  that  several  of  the  communities  re- 
quested the  School  of  Public  Welfare  to  have  students  again  as- 
signed to  them  for  field  work.  Two  of  the  students  also  accepted 
paid  positions  in  Durham  County,  one  as  Red  Cross  executive  secre- 
tary and  the  other  as  county  attendance  officer. 

In  this  summer  training  course  the  field-work  emphasis  was  upon 
the  gathering  of  information  about  the  communities  visited.  Little 
attempt  was  made  to  go  beyond  the  preliminary  steps  that  must  be 
taken  before  community  work  can  be  developed.  It,  therefore,  did 
not  make  available  to  the  students  the  wide  training  needed  by 
social  workers.  But  even  in  the  most  favored  circumstances  this 
cannot  be  done  in  a  short  summer  course.  When  students  are 
required  to  become  familiar  with  the  technique  of  community 
work,  as  well  as  that  of  family  case  work,  it  is  useless  to  expect  them 
to  cover  the  whole  ground  in  less  than  one  year.  Later  experience 
may  prove  that  a  much  longer  time  than  this  is  necessary  to  give 
students  the  training  they  need  for  organization  and  executive  work 
in  small  communities  together  with  a  technical  knowledge  of  the 
methods  of  family  case  work. 


766  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

One  of  the  serious  problems  in  training  courses  of  this  kind  is 
that  of  transportation.  If  students  must  cover  a  wide  territory 
where  street  cars  are  not  available,  some  other  means  of  transpor- 
tation must  be  provided.  To  hire  conveyances  is  too  expensive  and 
reliance  upon  the  conveyances  of  friends  or  co-operating  organi- 
zations makes  systematic  field  work  impossible.  The  best  solution 
would  seem  to  be  for  the  school  of  social  work  to  add  to  its  equip- 
ment one  or  more  automobiles  which  under  certain  conditions  can 
be  used  by  the  students.  A  practical  plan  of  operation  which  would 
be  financially  burdensome  to  neither  the  students  nor  the  school 
would  be  to  charge  a  sufi&cient  mileage  to  cover  depreciation  and 
operating  expenses.  Since  the  students  who  later  accept  positions 
in  county  work  will  find  an  automobile  an  indispensable  part  of 
their  equipment,  the  operation  and  care  of  a  car  might  be  made  a 
requirement  of  the  training  course.  Unless  arrangements  can  be 
made  to  give  students  easy  and  quick  access  to  rural  communities 
and  adjacent  small  towns,  it  will  usually  be  found  impracticable 
to  offer  courses  that  require  field  work  outside  the  city  in  which 
the  school  is  located. 

The  rural  training  courses  thus  far  given  have  demonstrated 
that  there  is  plenty  of  field  work  to  be  done  in  small  towns  and  the 
open  country.  It  is  clear  that  the  rural  field  furnishes  all  sorts  of 
problems  which  have  as  much  educational  value  as  do  those  found 
in  the  city.  More  experience  will  be  needed  to  prove  whether  it  is 
entirely  practicable  in  a  rural  situation  to  give  satisfactory  training 
in  family  case  work.  The  point  of  chief  significance  that  has  thus 
far  been  established  is  the  practical  value  in  a  training  course  of 
experience  in  studying  social  life  under  simple  conditions  and  in 
participating  in  the  development  of  rural  community  activities. 


STUDENTS'  DISSERTATIONS  IN 
SOCIOLOGY 


The  following  list  of  doctoral  dissertations  and  Masters'  theses  in 
preparation  in  American  universities  and  colleges  is  the  compilation  of 
the  returns  from  letters  sent  by  the  editors  of  the  Journal  to  departments 
of  sociology.  The  dates  given  indicate  the  probable  year  in  which  the 
degree  will  be  conferred.  The  name  of  the  college  or  university  in 
itahcs  refers  to  the  institution  where  the  theses  or  dissertations  are  in 
progress. 

List  of  Doctoral  Dissertations  in  Progress  in  American 
Universities  and  Colleges 

Van  Meter  Ames,  Ph.B.  Chicago.  "Friendship  among  the  Greeks."  1922. 
Chicago. 

Gertrude  B.  Austin,  B.S.  Grinnell.  "Leadership  in  the  Woman  Suffrage 
Movement  in  New  York  City."     192 1.     Columbia. 

Ray  E.  Baber,  A.B.  Campbell;  A.M.  Wisconsin.  "Changes  in  the  Size  of 
American  FamiHes."     1923.     Wisconsin. 

Frank  Clyde  Baker,  A.B.  Oberlin;  B.D.Yale;  LL.B.  New  York  Law  School; 
LL.M.  New  York  University  Law  School.  "A  Statistical  Study  of  the 
Local  Distribution  of  Voting  on  Constitutional  Amendments  by  the 
Population  of  New  York  City."     1921.     Columbia. 

Owen  F.  Beal,  A.B.,  A.M.  Utah.  "Labor  Legislation  of  Utah  since  State- 
hood."    1921.     Columbia. 

Herman  H.  Beneke,  A.B.  Miami;  A.M.  Chicago.  "The  Concept  of  Graft." 
1922.     Chicago. 

Martin  Hayes  Bickham,  A.B.  Pennsylvania;  A.M.  Chicago.  "The  Social 
Evolution   of   Democracy."     1921.     Chicago. 

Emerson  O.  Bradshaw,  Ph.B.,  A.M.  Chicago.  "Social  Forces  Affecting  the 
Life  of  the  Industrial  Community."     1922.     Chicago. 

Beulah  B.  Briley,  B.S.  Iowa  State  College;  A.M.  Iowa  State  University. 
"The  Economic  EflSciency  of  the  Single  Family  as  a  Household  Unit." 
1922.     Iowa. 

Ginevra  Capocelli,  A.B.  Naples;  A.M.  Columbia.  "The  Influence  of  the 
War  on  Italy."     1921.     Columbia. 

Ernest  John  Chave,  A.B.,  B.Th.  McMaster;  A.M.  Chicago.  "Life  Situations 
of  Children  Nine  to  Eleven."     1921.     Chicago. 

Alice  S.  Cheyney,  A.B.  Vassar.  "A  Theory  of  Social  Work."  1921.  Penn- 
sylvania. 

767 


768  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

Archibald  B.  Clark,  A.B.  Reed.     "The  Popular  Vote  as  an  Index  of  Solidarity." 

192 1.  Columbia. 

Frieda  Opal  Daniel,  A.B.  Drake.     "A  Social  Survey  of  an  Industrial  Area, 

Chicago."     1922.     Chicago. 
Stanley  P.  Davies,  A.B.  Bucknell.     "Racial  Assimilation  in  a  Community  in 

the  Anthracite  Coal  Region."     1921.     Columbia. 
Jerome  Davis,  A.M.  Columbia.     "Russians  in  the  United  States."     1921. 

Columbia. 
William  Lloyd  Davis,  Ph.B.  Wisconsin.     "Social  Eflfects  of  the  Development 

of  the  Arts  of  Selling."     1922.     Wisconsin. 
Carl  Addington  Dawson,  A.B  Acadia;   B.D.  Chicago.     "The  Social  Nature 

of  Thinking."     1921.     Chicago. 
Harmon  O.  DeGraff,  A.B.,  A.M.  Iowa.     "Juvenile  Delinquency  in  Iowa." 

1922.  Iowa. 

Frederick  German  Detweiler,  A.B.,  A.M.  Denison;   B.D.  Rochester.     "The 

Negro  Press  in  the  United  States."     1921.     Chicago. 
Z.  T.  Egardner,  A.B.  Basel;  A.M.  Cincinnati.     "Problems  of  Socialization, 

Democratization,  and  Americanization  in  an  Urban  Community."     1921. 

Chicago. 
Kenneth  M.  Gould,  A.B.  University  of  Pittsburgh.     "A  Quantitative  Scale 

for  Measuring  the  Social  Welfare  of  Cities."     1923.     Columbia. 
Ralph  P.  Halben,  A.B.  Franklin  and  Marshall.     "Poverty  with  Relation  to 

Education."     1921.     Pennsylvania. 
Ernest  B,  Harper,  A.B.,  A.M.  Virginia;   B.D.  Chicago.     "Psychotherapy  of 

Personal  Moral  Complexes. "     1921.     Chicago. 
George  E.  Hartmann,  A.B.  Cincinnati.     "Race  Consciousness:    A  Function 

of  Race  Prejudice,  with  Particular  Reference  to  the  American  Negro." 

192 1.     Chicago. 
Horace  B.  Hawthorn,  A.B.,  A.M.  Iowa.     "Rural  Standards  and  Social  Effi- 
ciency."    1921.     Wisconsin. 
Roy  Hinman  Holmes,  A.B.   Hillsdale;    A.M.    Michigan.     "The    Farm   in 

Democracy."     1922.    Michigan. 
Jakub  Hofak,   Ph.B.   Chicago.     "A   Study  of  Czecho-Slovak   Community 

Organization  in  Chicago."     1921.     Chicago. 
Charles  Dee  Johnson,  A.B.,  A.M.  Mississippi.     "The  Negro  Problem  in 

Relation  to  Education  in  the  South."     192 1.     Iowa. 
Glenn  R.  Johnson,  A.B.  Reed.     "The  American  Newspaper  as  an  Indicator 

of  Social  Forces."     1921.     Columbia. 
Frederick   Jones.     B.S.    Virginia    Polytechnic    Institute;     A.B.    Richmond; 

A.M.   Columbia.     "Measure  of   Forms  of   Political   Progress."     192 1. 

Columbia. 
Oscar  W.  Junek,  A.M.  Prague.     "  Contribution  to  the  Technique  of  the  Study 

of  Group  Psychology."     1922.     Chicago. 
Fay  B.  Karpf,  B.S.  Northwestern.     "American  Social  Psychology."     1922. 

Chicago. 


STUDENTS'  DISSERTATIONS  IN  SOCIOLOGY  769 

Samuel  C.  Kincheloe,  A.B.  Drake;  A.M.  Chicago.  "The  Prophet,  the  Poet, 
the  Agitator."     1922.     Chicago. 

Ellis  Lore  Kirkpatrick,  B.S.  Iowa;  M.S.  Kansas.  "The  Farmer's  Standard 
of  Living."     1922.     Cornell. 

Russell  R.  Kletzing,  A.B.  Northwestern.  "The  Relation  of  the  Church  and 
Labor."     1924.     Chicago. 

Ernst  Theodor  Krueger,  A.B.  Illinois;  B.D.  Chicago  Theological  Seminary; 
A.M.  Chicago.  "Life-History  Case  Studies  in  Temperaments  and  So- 
cial Attitudes  of  College  Students."     192 1.     Chicago. 

Dan  H.  Kulp,  A.B.,  A.M.  Brown.     "The  Chinese  Family."     192 1.     Chicago. 

Oswald  R.  Lavers,  A.B.,  B.D.  Queens;  A.M.  Chicago.  "The  Social  Signifi- 
cance of  Housing."     1922.     Chicago. 

John  Lord,  A.B.  Transylvania;  A.M.  Syracuse.  "The  History  of  Spanish 
Sociolog>\"     1921.     Clark. 

Charles  William  Margold,  A.B.,  A.M.  Columbia.  "Celibacy  among  Notable 
Americans."     1921.    Michigan. 

Anne  Harold  Martin,  Ph.B.  Chicago.     "The  Conflict  Myth."    1922.    Chicago. 

Joseph  Mayer.  "Public  Opinion  and  the  Control  of  the  Social  Evil."  192 1. 
Columbia. 

Bruce  Lee  Melvin,  A.B.,  A.M.  Missouri.  "  The  Social  Structure  and  Function 
of  the  American  Village  in  Its  Relation  to  the  Open  Country."  1921, 
Missouri. 

Roderick  D.  McKenzie,  A.B.  Manitoba;  A.M.  Chicago.  "The  Social  Study 
of  the  Neighborhood."     192 1.     Chicago. 

Snyder  Harmon  Milton,  A.B.,  A.M.  Carthage;  B.D.  Wittenberg.  "  Lutheran 
Psychoanalysis."     1922.     Chicago. 

Ralph  W.  Nelson,  A.B.  Phillips;  A.M.  Kansas;  B.D.  Yale.  "Elements  of 
the  Social  Theory  of  Jesus."     1922.     Chicago. 

Clemens  Niemi,  A.B.  Minnesota;  A.M.  Chicago.  "The  Finnish  Element  in 
the  American  Population. "     1921.     Chicago. 

Hazel  Grant  Ormsbee,  A.B.  Cornell.  "The  Juvenile  Labor  Exchange  in 
the  United  States  and  England,  with  a  Statistical  Analysis  of  Records 
in  the  Philadelphia  Bureau  of  Compulsory  Education."  1922.  Bryn 
Mawr. 

Bernard  Ostrolenk,  B.S.  Massachusetts  Agricultural  College;  A.M.  Penn- 
sylvania. "  Social  Aspects  of  a  Decreasing  Food  Supply."  1922.  Penn- 
sylvania. 

Maurice  Thomas  Price,  A.B.  Chicago.  "The  Technique  of  Religious  Propa- 
ganda."    1921.     Chicago. 

Edward  G.  Punke,  B.S.  Hastings;  A.M.  Missouri.  "Effect  of  Industrial 
Depression  on  Marriage  and  Birth-Rate."     1922.     Michigan. 

Clarence  E.  Rainwater,  A.B.,  A.M.  Drake.  "The  Neighborhood  Center." 
192 1.     Chicago. 

S.  C.  Ratcliflfe.  A.B.  Mount  Allison;  A.M.  Alberta.  "The  Historical  Develop- 
ment of  Poor  Relief  Legislation  in  Illinois."     192 1.     Chicago. 


770  TEE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

Ellery  Francis  Reed,  A.B.  Lenox;  A.M.  Clark.     "The  Treatment  of  Social 

Radicalism."     1921.     Wisconsin. 
Ruth  Reed,  A.B.  Brennan;  A.M.  Georgia.     "The  Negro  Press  in  America." 

1922.     Columbia. 
Frank  Alexander  Ross,  Ph.B.  Yale;    A.M.   Columbia.     "A  Study  of  the 

Application  of  Statistical  Methods  to  Sociological  Problems."     1921. 

Columbia. 

George  S.  H.  Rossouw,  A.M.  Chicago.  "Nationalism  and  Language."  1921. 
Chicago. 

Albert  James  Saunders,  A.M.,  B.D.  Chicago.  "Changing  Attitudes  and  the 
Missionary  Task  in  India."     1921.     Chicago. 

J.  T.  Sellin,  A.B.,  A.M.  Augustana.  "Swedish  Sociology."  1922.  Penn- 
sylvania. 

Herbert  Newhard  Shenton,  A.B.  Dickinson;  A.M.  Columbia;  B.D.  Drew. 
"Collective  Decision."     1921.     Columbia. 

Ernest  Hugh  Shideler,  A.B.  Ottawa;  A.M.  Chicago.  "Social  Heredity." 
1922.    Chicago. 

Russell  Gordon  Smith,  A.B.  Richmond;  A.M.  Columbia.  "A  Sociological 
Study  of  Opinion  in  the  United  States."     1921.     Columbia. 

Donald  R.  Taft,  A.B.  Clark.     "Portuguese  in  New  England."  1921.  Columbia. 

Franklin  Thomas,  A.B.  Beloit.  "Theories  concerning  the  Influence  of  Physi- 
cal Environment  upon  Society."     1921.     Columbia. 

Frederic  Milton  Thrasher,  A.B.  De  Pauw;  A.M.  Chicago.  "The  Boy  Scout 
Movement  as  a  Socializing  Agency."     1922.     Chicago. 

W.  Russell  Tylor,  A.B.  Swathmore;  A.M.  Wisconsin.  "Organized,  Disguised 
Propaganda."     1922.     Wisconsin. 

Amey  Eaton  Watson,  A.B.  Brown;  A.M.Pennsylvania.  "  Social  Treatment 
of  Illegitimate  Mothers."     1921.     Bryn  Mawr. 

Comer  M.  Woodward,  A.B.  Emory;  A.M.,  B.D.  Chicago.  "A  Case  Study 
of  Successful  Rural  Churches."     192 1.     Chicago. 

D.  R.  Young,  A.B.  Lafayette.  "Social  Importance  of  Motion  Pictures." 
1922.     Pennsylvania. 

Erie  Fiske  Young,  Ph.B.,  A.M.  Chicago.  "  The  Use  of  Case  Method  in  Train- 
ing Social  Workers."     1922.     Chicago. 

Oscar  Bernard  Ytrehes,  A.B.  North  Dakota.  "The  Norse-Danish  Press  in 
the    United    States."     1922.     Chicago. 

List  of  Masters'  Dissertations  in  Progress  in  American 
Universities  and  Colleges 

Max  Arzt,  B.S.  College  of  the  City  of  New  York.    "Recreational  Facilities 

of  a  Lower  East  Side  District."     1921.     Columbia. 
Mary  Louise  Ash,  A.B.  Agnes  Scott.     "Three  Generations  of  a  Southern 

Family."     1921.     Columbia. 


STUDENTS'  DISSERTATIONS  IN  SOCIOLOGY  771 

Edwin  F.  Bamford,  A.B.  Southern  California.  "Social  Aspects  of  the  Fishing 
Industry  in  Los  Angeles  Harbor."     1920.     Southern  California. 

Alfred  M.  Black,  A.B.  Wake  Forrest.  "Changes  in  State  Control  of  Mar- 
riage."    IQ2I.     Columbia. 

Thomas  Blaisdell,  A.B.  Pennsylvania  State  College.  "The  Present  Status 
of  Labor  Legislation  in  India."     1921.    Columbia. 

Roy  Melton  Brown,  A.B.  North  Carolina.  "The  Correlation  of  Social 
Agencies  in  North  Carohna."     192 1.    North  Carolina. 

Marguerite  Buckhous,  B.S.  Montana.  "The  Value  of  the  Health  Center 
in  Public  Health  Service."     1921.     Columbia. 

Ruth  E.  Chapman,  A.B.  Trinity.  "A  Social  Type  of  the  Old  South."  1921. 
Columbia. 

Tiao-Swen  Chu,  A.B.  Nanking.  "A  Comparison  of  Reconstruction  Programs." 
1 92 1.     Northwestern. 

Edna  Clark,  Ph.B.  Chicago.    "Case  Work  and  the  Employer."    1922.    Chicago. 

Everett  R.  Clinchy,  B.S.  Lafayette.  "The  Outcastes  of  India."  1921. 
Columbia. 

Robert  U.  Cooper,  B.H.  Springfield  Y.M.C.A.  College.  "The  History  of  the 
Treatment  of  the  Insane  in  Massachusetts."     192 1.     Clark. 

Edith  B.  Cousins,  A.B.Texas.   "Leadership  in  a  Girls' Club."  1921.  Columbia. 

AUce  Culp,  A.B.  Southern  California.  "A  Case  Study  of  Mexican  Children 
in  Los  Angeles."     1920.    Southern  California. 

Mary  J.  Delany,  A.B.  St.  Lawrence.  "  Rehgious  Education  in  Public  Schools." 
192 1.     Columbia. 

Mrs.  Inez  Douglass,  A.B.  Southern  California.  "The  Causes  of  DeUnquency 
among  Girls  in  Los  Angeles."     1920.    Southern  California. 

Mary  R.  Fenderich,  A.B.  Oberlin.  "Social  Tendencies  in  the  Methodist 
Episcopal  Church."     1921.     Columbia. 

Alice  Fesler,  A.B.  Southern  California.  "A  Social  Service  Program  for  the 
Churches."     192 1.     Southern  California. 

Faith  M.  Frazier,  A.B.  Heidelberg.  "The  City  Block  Organization  Plan." 
192 1.     Columbia. 

Meredith  B.  Givens,  A.B.  Drake.  "Labor  and  Protest  Parties."  1921. 
Chicago. 

Miriam  Goldblatt,  A.B.  Rochester.  "The  History  of  Juvenile  Court  Pro- 
cedure in  New  York  State."     1921.    Columbia. 

Ruth  A.  Grimes,  A.B.  Chicago.  "Socializing  Forces  in  South  Blue  Island." 
1 92 1.     Chicago. 

Irma  Hahn,  A.B.  Barnard.  " Recent  Legislation  for  the  Promotion  of  Physical 
Education."     1921.     Columbia. 

Will  Ashley  Hawley,  B.D.  Yale.  "Social  and  Economic  Causes  of  Divorce 
in  the  United  States."     1921.     Columbia. 

Norman  S.  Hayner,  A.B.  Washington.  "Effect  of  Prohibition  in  Packing- 
town."     192 1.     Chicago. 


772  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

Melville  J.  Herskovits,  Ph.B.  Chicago.  "Arrests  of  Labor  Leaders  in  the 
United  States."     1921.     Columbia. 

Minnie  Himmelstein,  A.B.  Hunter.  "Government  Aid  for  Housing  of  Wage- 
Earners  in  the  United  States."     1921.     Columbia. 

Sze  Yuan  Ho,  A.B.  Beloit.  "Chinese  Political  Ideas  from  1898  to  1920." 
1 92 1.     Chicago. 

Charles  Russell  Hoffer.  "A  Study  of  Paternal  Parental  Occupation  of  Iowa 
State  College  Graduates,  and  the  Occupations  Entered  by  the  Agricul- 
tural Graduates  upon  Graduation,  1910-1920."     1921.    Iowa  State  College. 

Alexander  W.  Holroyd,  A.B.  Hiram.  "Is  the  Type  of  '  Great  Man'  in  America 
Changing?"     1921.     Columbia. 

Frank  L.  Hunt,  A.B.  Mercer;  B.D.  Newton.  "Socializing  Experiments 
among  Boys."     1921.     Chicago. 

Mabel  Jackson,  A.B.  Southern  CaHfornia.  "The  Teaching  of  EngHsh  as  a 
Socializing  Process  Based  on  Experiments  in  the  Junior  High  School." 

1920.  Southern  California. 

Harold  R.  Keen,  A.B.  Williams.     "The  Educational  Problem  in  a  Suburban 

Town."     1 92 1.     Columbia. 
Mary  B.  Kellogg,  A.B.  Mills.     "A  Case  Study  of  Child  Placing  in  Los  Angeles." 

192 1.  Southern  California. 

Helen  G.  Kixmiller,  A.B.   DePauw.     "The   Toynbee   Society   of   DePauw 

University."     1921.     Columbia. 
Toryu   Kudara,   A.B.  ,Waseda.     "Social  Influences  of  the   'Namu  Amida 

Butsu' in  Japan."     1921.     Columbia. 

E.  C.  Lacy,  A.B.  Milligan;    B.Th.  Transylvania.     "The  Orphan  Child  in 

Kentucky."     1921.    Kentucky. 
Paula  C.  Lambert,  A.B.  Barnard.     "Maternity  Insurance  in  the  United 
States."     192 1.     Columbia. 

F.  Lambertson,  A.B.,  B.D.  Boston.     "The  Evolution  of  Rural  Housing,  with 

Special  Reference  to  American  Conditions."     1921.    Northwestern. 
Lalia  Lane,  A.B.  Hunter.     "Care  of  Mental  Defectives  in  New  York  City." 

192 1.     Columbia. 
Choo  Y.  Lee,  A.B.  Drake.     "Comparison  between  Social  Conditions  in  Korea 

and  in  the  United  States."     1921.     Chicago. 
CMnton  Leonard,  B.H.  Springfield  Y.M.C.A.  College.     "Educational  Work 

of  Y.M.C.A.  of  Boston."     1921.     Clark. 
Yat  Kwan  Liang,  A.B.  Chicago.     "The  Chinese  Family  System."     1921. 

Columbia. 
Chiang  Liu,  A.B.   Cornell  College  (Iowa).     "The  Position  of  Women  in 

China."     1921.    Iowa. 
Delbert    Martin    Mann,    A.B.    Kansas.     "The    Economic    Implications    of 

Democracy."     1921.     Kansas. 
Ada  C.  McCown,  A.B.  Reed.     "Population  and  the  Physical  Environment 

in  Oregon."     1921.     Columbia. 


STUDENTS'  DISSERTATIONS  IN  SOCIOLOGY  773 

Edith  H.  McDowell,  A.B.  Mount  Holyoke.     "Lincoln  University  and  Its 

Alumni."     192 1.     Columbia. 
Ross  A.  McReynolds,  A.B.  Missouri.     "Survey  of  Farm  Homes  and  Families 

in  Boone  County,  Missouri."     1921.     Missouri. 
Olga  M.   Meloy,  A.B.   Dickinson.     "A  Recreation  Survey  of  Harrisburg, 

Pennsylvania."     1921.     Chicago. 
Ernest  R.  Mowrer,  A.B.  Kansas.     "Causes  of  Divorce."     192 1.     Chicago. 
Thomas  J.  Murray.     "Rise,  Progress,  and  Program  of  the  British  Labor 

Party."     192 1.     Columbia. 
W.  L.  Nofcie,  A.B.  Union.     "An  Economic  Social  Survey  of  the  Kentucky 

Mountain  Countries."     1921.    Northwestern. 
Stanley  North,  B.S.  Rutgers.     "Housing  and  Migration  in  a  New  York  City 

District."     1921.     Columbia. 
H.  C.  Northcott,  A.B.  Northwestern;   B.D.  Garrett.     "A  Survey  of  Elsdon 

Neighborhood,  Chicago."     1921.    Northwestern. 
Leonardo  Padilla,  A.B.  Ohio  Wesleyan.     "The  Functioning  of  Government 

in  the  PhiHppines  since  the  'Autonomous  Act'  of  1916."   1921.  Columbia. 
Charles  H.  Parrish,  A.B.  Howard.     "Social  Organization  among  the  Negroes 

of  a  New  Jersey  Town."     1921.     Columbia. 
Benjamin  Plotkin,  A.B.  College  of  the  City  of  New  York.     "The  Social  Ideal 

of  Isaiah."     192 1.     Columbia. 
Annie  Beckwdth  Pruitt,  A.B.  North  Carolina.     "Programs  for  the  Correlation 

of  School  and  Home."     192 1.     North  Carolina. 
Minta  Madelyne  Queen,  A.B.  Southwestern.     "The  Changing  Attitude  of 

the  Negro. "     1921.    Kansas. 
James  Alfred  Quinn,  A.B.   Missouri.     "Fandly  Desertion  in   St.   Louis." 

192 1.     Missouri. 
Leroy  A.  Ramsdell,  B.S.  Bowdoin.     "Vital  Losses  Due  to  Preventable  Dis- 
eases in  Rural  Communities."     1921.     Columbia. 
William  Lee  Rector,  A.B.  Oklahoma  Baptist  University.     " The  Place  of  Ideals 

in  Moral  Education."     1921.    Missouri. 
Samuel  Courts  Redford,  A.B.  Oklahoma  Baptist  University.     "Survey  of 

Atoka  and  Tillman  Counties,  Oklahoma."     1921.    Missouri. 
Leona  D.  Rubelman,  A.B.  Iowa.     "Activities  of  the  Church  in  the  Field  of 

Labor."     192 1.    Iowa. 
Wiley  Blake  Sanders,  A.B.,  A.M.  Emory.     "An  Attempt  to  describe  Modes 

of  Adaptation  to  Human  Environment."     192 1.     North  Carolina. 
Florence  W.  Schaper,  B.S.  Missouri.     "The  Place  of  the  Social  Sciences  in 

Junior  Colleges  for  Women."     1921.     Missouri. 
Gustav.  T.  Schwenning,   B.H.   Springfield  Y.M.C.A.   College.     "Industrial 

Work  of  the  Y.M.C.A."     1921.     Clark. 
Harry  B.  Sell,  A.B.  Pittsburgh.     "The  A.  F.  of  L.  and  the  Labor  Party  Idea." 

1921.     Chicago. 
Gladys  Sellen,  A.B.  Cincinnati.     "Total  Return  of  Workmen  from  Industry." 

192 1.     Cincinnati. 


774  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

Paul  W.  Shankweiler,  Ph.B.  Muhlenberg.     "The  Nonpartisan  League  and 

the  Local  Community."     192 1.     Columbia. 
T.  C.  Shaw,  A.B.  Central  Wesleyan.     "The  Social  Doctrines  of  Confucius." 

192 1.     Northwestern. 
Stockwell  Simms,  A.B.  Acadia.     "The  Neighborhood  Center  a  Factor  in 

Socialization."     1921.    Boston. 
Harold   E.    Sortor,   A.B.    Cornell   College.     "Development   of   Sociological 

Consciousness."     1921.     Chicago. 
W.  B.  Stone,  Ph.B.  Chicago.     "Study  in  Culture  Conflicts."    1921.    Chicago. 
Walter  BUss  Swan,  A.B.  Indiana.     "Feeble-minded  Ex-Service  Men."     1921. 

Indiana. 
Elizabeth  Tandy,  Ph.B.  Chicago.     "The  Organization  and  Administration 

of  Pubhc  Health  Agencies  for  the  Prevention  and  ReUef  of  Sickness  in 

the  Rural  Communities  of  New  York  State."     1921.     Columbia. 
L.  R.  Templin,  A.B.  Southwestern;   B.D.  Garrett.     "A  Survey  of  an  Open 

Country  Neighborhood:    North  Prairie,  lUinois."     1921,    Northwestern. 
Charles  B.  Thompson,  A.B.  Hamilton.     "Curriculum  Changes  in  Theological 

Seminaries."     1921.     Columbia. 
Earl  Vaugh  Timmins,  A.B.  Kansas.     "The  Personal  Element  in  Journalism." 

192 1.    Kansas. 
C.  T.  Tseo,  A.B.  Bates.     "The  Chinese  Family."     1921.    Northwestern. 
Henson  Utchikata,  A.B.  Washington.     "Minimum  Wage  Legislation  and  Its 

Administration  in  the  United  States."     1921.    Columbia. 
Melvin  J.  Vincent,  A.B.  Southern  California.     "An  Analysis  of  the  Socio- 
logical Writings  of  George  ElUott  Howard."     1920.    Southern  California. 
Mary  Alloniz  Waldron,  A.B.  Indiana.     "Causes  of  Dependence  in  Twenty- 
six  Selected  Famihes."     1921.     Indiana. 
May  D.  Ward,  B.S.  Washington.     "Variety  of  Work  Done  by  Women." 

1 92 1.     Columbia. 
Helen  B.  Watson,  A.B.  Newcomb.     "The  Practice  of  Midwifery  in  New 

Orleans."     192 1.    Louisiana. 
Pauline  Wherry,  A.B.,  B.S.  Texas.     "The  Small  Town:   A  Study  of  a  Ken- 
tucky Community."     1921.    Kentucky. 
Cass  Ward  Whitney,  B.S.  Cornell.     "The  Play  Activities  of  Rural  School 

Children  in  New  York  State."     1922.     Cornell. 
Malcohn  M.  WiUey,  A.B.  Clark.     "The  News  Appeal  of  the  Rural  Press." 

192 1.     Columbia. 
Blodwen  Mary  Williams,  A.B.  Iowa.     "Social,  Historical,  and  Racial  Factors 

in  Welsh  Community  and  Choral  Singing."     1921.    Iowa. 
Hidesakuro  Yokoyama,  A.B.  Utah.     "A  Study  of  Japanese  Communities  in 

the  United  States."     1921.     Chicago. 
WiUie  Zuber,  A.B.  Newcomb.     "Spare-Time  Activities  of  a  Group  of  Factory 

Girls."     192 1.     Louisiana. 
Frederick  R.  Zucker,  A.B.  Concordia  Seminary.     "Attitudes  of  Low  Caste 

People  in  South  India."     1921.    Chicago. 


NEWS  AND  NOTES 


Notes  of  interest  to  the  readers  of  the  Journal  should  be  in  the  hands  of  the 
editor  of  "News  and  Notes"  not  later  than  the  tenth  of  the  month  preceding 
publication. 

Russell  Sage  Foundation 
The  Journal  has  received  an  advance  copy  for  review  of  the  Social 
Workers^  Guide  to  Serial  Publications  of  Representative  Social  Agencies 
by  Elsie  M.  Rushmore.  The  value  of  the  Guide  to  social  workers  and 
to  sociologists  is  indicated  by  the  fact  that  it  Usts  approximately  four 
thousand  institutions  and  organizations  whose  pubhcations  are  on  the 
library  shelves.  This  volume  has  been  issued  in  order  to  make  the 
collection  more  readily  available.  Its  Index,  arranged  by  subjects — 
the  Feeble-minded,  the  Blind,  Prison  Reform,  and  so  forth — makes  it 
possible  for  students  to  find  valuable  reports  of  institutions  in  a  particu- 
lar field.  Acknowledgment  is  given  to  the  assistance  of  John  B. 
Andrews,  Leonard  P.  Ayres,  Kate  HoUaday  Claghorn,  Earle  Clarke, 
Charles  K.  Gilbert,  Arthur  H.  Ham,  Lee  F.  Hanmer,  Shelby  M.  Harrison, 
Hastings  H.  Hart,  Philip  P.  Jacobs,  Allen  J.  Kennedy,  Porter  R.  Lee, 
R.  R.  Lutz,  Samuel  McCune  Lindsay,  Orlando  F.  Lewis,  Clarence  A. 
Perry,  Mary  E.  Richmond,  Franz  Schneider,  Henry  W.  Thurston, 
PhiHp  Van  Ingen,  Mary  Van  Kleeck,  Agnes  Van  Valkenburgh,  Gaylord 
S.  White.  Sociologists  interested  in  research  will  welcome  this  aid  to 
investigation.  

Science  Service 

The  estabhshment  of  an  organization  for  the  purpose  of  famiharizing 
the  general  reading  pubhc  with  the  progress  of  scientific  research  was 
announced  today  at  the  offices  of  the  National  Research  Council.  The 
new  organization,  to  be  known  as  "Science  Service,"  has  been  sub- 
stantially endowed  and  is  chartered  as  a  non-profit-making  corporation. 
Its  control  is  vested  in  a  board  of  trustees  composed  of  ten  scientists 
and  five  journaUsts.  The  National  Academy  of  Sciences,  the  American 
Association  for  the  Advancement  of  Science,  and  the  National  Research 
Council  each  elects  three  trustees. 

The  charter  of  the  new  organization  is  a  wide  one,  authorizing 
Science  Service   to  employ  newspapers,   periodicals,   books,   lectures, 

775 


776  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

conferences,  motion  pictures,  and  any  similar  educational  agencies  in 
the  distribution  of  scientific  information.  Edwin  E.  Slosson,  for  twelve 
years  professor  of  chemistry  at  the  University  of  Wyoming,  for  seventeen 
years  literary  editor  of  the  Independent,  is  to  be  the  editor  of  Science 
Service.  The  manager  is  to  be  Howard  Wheeler,  formerly  managing 
editor  of  Harper^s  Weekly  and  for  five  years  editor  of  Everybody's  Maga- 
zine. The  poHcy  of  the  Service,  according  to  the  announcement,  is  to 
be  one  of  co-operation  rather  than  competition  with  existing  press 
associations,  news  agencies,  and  syndicates.  It  will  aim  to  supply 
accurate  and  interesting  articles  on  all  branches  of  science  and  tech- 
nology at  the  lowest  possible  cost. 

Offices  have  been  opened  in  the  National  Research  Council  Building, 
1701  Massachusetts  Avenue,  Washington,  D.C. 


"The  Hospital  Social  Service  Quarterly" 
The  Hospital  Social  Service  Quarterly,  after  two  years  of  pubhcation, 
has  become  a  monthly  magazine  to  be  known  as  Hospital  Social  Service. 
Medical  social  service  in  hospitals  has  passed  the  formative  stage  and 
is  now  recognized  as  a  distinct  department  of  the  hospital.  The  Hospital 
Social  Service  Quarterly  was  first  published  in  February,  1919.  Prior  to 
this  time  the  chief  writings  on  the  subject  were  embodied  in  the  works 
of  Dr.  Richard  Cabot,  and  in  occasional  special  articles  in  hospital  and 
medical  journals.  The  Proceedings  of  the  Hospital  Social  Service 
Association  of  New  York  City  preceded  the  Quarterly  and  consisted 
chiefly  of  papers  read  at  the  meetings  of  the  association.  The  first 
issue  of  the  monthly  magazine  contains  the  survey  of  hospital  social 
work  in  the  United  States  which  was  made  by  the  American  Hospital 
Association  last  year;  an  account  of  social  work  in  hospitals  of  Toronto 
by  Mr.  Robert  Mills  of  the  Toronto  Health  Department;  an  article  by 
0.  M.  Lewis  and  two  collaborators  of  the  division  of  venereal  disease 
of  the  Massachusetts  General  Hospital;  a  discussion  of  methods  of 
parental  authority,  by  Miss  J.  L.  Beard. 

The  editor  of  the  Quarterly  is  Dr.  E.  G.  Stillman.  .\mong  the 
contributing  editors  are  Dr.  Michael  M.  Davis,  Jr.,  John  E.  Ransom, 
Ida  M.  Cannon,  and  Dr.  Jessica  B.  Peixotto.  The  editorial  offices  are 
at  19  East  Seventy-second  Street,  New  York  City. 


Brown  University 
D.  Appleton  &  Co.  announce  the  publication  of  the  volume  The 
State  a7id  Government  by  James  Quayle  Dealey,  professor  of  social  and 


NEWS  AND  NOTES  777 

political  science.     The  publishers  state  that  it  is  an  introduction  to 
political  science  from  the  sociological  point  of  view. 


University  of  Chicago 

Professor  Walter  B.  Bodenhafer,  of  the  Washington  University, 
will  give  two  courses  on  "General  Sociology"  and  the  "Development 
of  Sociology  in  the  United  States"  in  the  Summer  Quarter.  Dr.  Warren 
S.  Thompson,  of  the  department  of  rural  organization  of  Cornell  Uni- 
versity, is  to  give  the  course  in  "Rural  Sociology." 

In  the  Graduate  School  of  Social  Service  Administration  Dr. 
Roderick  D.  McKenzie,  associate  professor  of  sociology  in  the  University 
of  Washington,  is  announced  to  give  two  courses,  one  in  "Social  Prog- 
ress" and  the  other  in  "Community  Organization."  Mr.  William  T. 
Cross,  formerly  survey  officer  of  the  Illinois  State  Department  of  Public 
Welfare,  will  ofiFer  a  course  on  "Physically  Handicapped  Persons." 


Clark  University 


Professor  Frank  Hamilton  Hankins,  head  of  the  department  of 
sociology,  is  spending  the  academic  year  1920-21  in  Europe  on  a  leave 
of  absence.  He  holds  a  fellowship  for  study  in  French  universities, 
and  is  also  delivering  a  series  of  lectures  on  American  institutions  before 
the  Ecole  Libre  des  Sc-iences  Politiques  under  the  auspices  of  the  Institute 
of  International  Education  of  New  York  City.  While  abroad  Professor 
Hankins  will  complete  a  book  which  he  has  been  preparing  on  the 
bearing  of  differential  biology  and  psychology  upon  the  theory  and 
practice  of  democracy.  The  work  in  sociology  in  Clark  University  for 
the  present  academic  year  is  under  the  charge  of  Professor  Harry  E. 
Barnes,  of  the  department  of  history,  and  courses  are  offered  by  Professor 
Barnes  and  by  Professor  HermannHilmer,  of  the  department  of  economics. 


University  of  Missouri 

The  University  of  Missouri  will  accept  for  entrance  beginning  with 
the  coming  academic  year  one-half  unit  in  sociology,  provided  the 
student  offers  at  the  same  time  either  one-half  unit  in  economics  or 
one-half  unit  in  American  government.  This  will  mean  the  establish- 
ment of  half-year  courses  in  Sociology  in  most  of  tJie  accredited  high 
schools  of  the  state.  The  course  is  being  standardized  by  the  depart- 
ment of  sociology  in  the  university  and  the  state  department  of  education. 


77S  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

Professor  C.  A.  EUwood  will  teach  sociology  this  summer  at  the 
University  of  Colorado,  Boulder,  Colorado,  for  the  first  half  of  the 
summer  quarter. 

Professor  A.  F.  Kuhlman,  assistant  professor  of  sociology  in  the 
University  of  Missouri,  will  spend  the  summer  studying  in  the  Graduate 
School  of  the  University  of  Chicago. 


University  of  New  York 
Dr.  Rudolph  M.  Binder,  head  of  the  department  of  sociology,  has 
been  offering  during  the  year  a  series  of  lectures  on  the  general  subject 
"Man's  Place  and  Responsibility  in  the  World"  at  the  Twenty- third 
Street  Y.M.C.A.  The  different  lectures  are  organized  to  describe  and 
elucidate  the  origin  and  the  development  of  life,  man,  society,  religion, 
the  state,  and  the  internation. 


University  of  Oklahoma 
The  Harlow  Publishing  Company  of  Oklahoma  City  announces 
the  publication  of  a  work  by  Professor  Jerome  Dowd,  entitled  Democracy 
in  America.    The  object  of  the  volume  is  to  show  the  relation  of  democ- 
racy to  the  progress  of  civilization. 


University  of  Pennsylvania 
Professor  Carl  Kelsey,  who  was  granted  a  year's  leave  of  absence, 
is  now  engaged  in  making  for  the  American  Academy  of  Political  and 
Social  Science  a  social  and  economic  survey  of  Haiti  and  Santo  Domingo. 


University  of  Southern  California 
Professor  Frank  W.  Blackmar,  of  the  University  of  Kansas,  will  give 
two  courses  in  the  coming  summer  session  at  the  University  of  Southern 
California.     "AppHed  Eugenics"  and  ** Problems  of  Democracy"  are 
the  titles  of  the  courses. 

Mr.  M.  J.  Vincent,  instructor  in  sociology,  is  offering  a  new  course 
this  semester  entitled  "The  Cost  of  Living."  Dr.  W.  C.  Smith  is 
giving  for  the  first  time,  a  course  entitled  "The  Family  as  a  Social 
Institution."  Professor  C.  E.  Rainwater  is  giving  a  new  course  on 
"Social  Uses  of  Leisure  Time." 

The  graduate  students  of  the  department  of  sociology  have  organized 
an  honor  society  which  is  known  as  Alpha  Kappa  Delta.  The  require- 
ments   for   membership   include   scholarship,    social   personality,    and 


NEWS  AND  NOTES  779 

distinctive  sociological  or  social-work  achievement.  Those  eligible  to 
membership  are  subject  to  definite  limitations  in  number.  The  society 
is  organized  on  a  democratic  basis  of  merit  with  no  secret  characteristics. 
The  new  division  of  social  work,  which  was  organized  in  1920,  has 
enrolled  fifty-two  students  this  semester  who  are  candidates  for  the 
certificate  of  social  work  and  the  diploma  of  social  work;  the  former 
being  given  only  to  persons  who  have  an  A.B.  degree  and  the  latter  to 
persons  who  have  an  A.M.  degree,  and  who  have  met  the  social-work 
requirements  that  have  been  set  by  the  division. 


Syracuse  University 

Professor  Philip  Archibald  Parsons,  who  has  been  the  head  of 
the  sociology  department  at  Syracuse  University  since  1909,  has  resigned 
to  accept  the  position  of  professor  of  sociology  and  director  of  the  school 
of  social  work  at  the  University  of  Oregon.  He  replaced  Professor 
Franklin  Thomas,  who  resigned  to  accept  the  superintendency  of  the 
famous  orphanage  at  Hastings-on-Hudson.  The  former  superintendent, 
Dr.  R.  R.  Reeder,  left  to  take  charge  of  child-relief  work  in  Serbia. 


Publications  of  the  American  Sociological  Society 

The  fifteenth  volume  of  the  Pubhcations  of  the  American  Socio- 
logical Society,  entitled  Some  Newer  Problems,  National  and  Social,  will 
be  oflf  the  press  early  in  May. 


REVIEWS 


Vocational  Education.  By  David  Snedden.  New  York:  Mac- 
millan,    1920.     Pp.    ix+587.     $2.75. 

This  volume  should  appeal  to  the  intelligent  students  of  educational 
systems  and  movements  and  to  the  sociologists.  It  is  a  thoroughgoing 
and  critical  study  of  vocational  education  in  the  light  of  the  actual  and 
pressing  demands  of  modern  society  and  the  nature  of  individuals 
subject  to  the  educational  process.  Its  method  is  the  analysis  of  the 
various  factors  entering  into  the  different  problems  of  vocational  edu- 
cation, criticism  of  present  vocational  educational  attempts  to  meet  the 
situation,  and  the  formulation  of  tentative  programs  for  construc- 
tively meeting  the  issue. 

The  chapters  of  the  book  deal  with  the  meaning  and  social  needs 
of  vocational  education,  its  relation  to  general  education,  its  principles 
of  method,  administration,  attempts,  and  programs  in  the  fields  of 
agriculture,  commerce,  industry,  homemaking,  and  the  professions, 
training  of  vocational  teachers,  special  and  future  problems  of  vocational 
education,  the  economic  future  of  women,  and  practical  arts  in  general 
education.  There  are  also  appendixes  on  occupational  statistics  and 
terminology  of  vocational  education. 

It  would  appear  that  the  great  motif  of  the  volume  is  specialization 
in  life  and  the  need  of  a  combination  or  correlated  training  of  practice, 
related  technical  knowledge,  and  social  insight  in  order  to  meet  this 
situation.  This  is  luminously  illustrated  in  all  the  essential  spheres  of 
endeavor — agriculture,  commerce,  homemaking,  etc. 

A  treatment  of  the  author's  view  on  several  important  points  may 
serve  to  give  a  perspective  of  his  general  position  in  this  field.  Voca- 
tional education,  according  to  the  text,  includes  both  by-vocational  and 
direct  vocational  education;  the  former  consisting  of  the  vocational 
training  people  pick  up  in  all  manner  of  ways  out  in  society  outside  of 
schools,  the  latter  of  the  direct  effort  made  in  schools  to  bestow  vocations. 
There  is  an  increasing  demand  for  vocational  education,  one  demand 
issuing  out  of  the  fact  that  society  goes  on  making  new  vocations  by 
the  process  of  specialization — something  that  is  inherent  in  society  and 
promises  to  be  continuous — another  demand  springing  out  of  the 
increased    need    for   production   and   productiveness   on    the   part  of 

780 


REVIEWS  781 

individuals  and  society  generally.  Increasing  democracy  that  presses 
for  productiveness  on  the  part  of  all  and  rising  standards  of  living  that 
render  it  imperative  that  each  worker  shall  make  an  increased  contri- 
bution in  order  to  draw  a  larger  income  explain  the  latter  demand. 

The  public  cannot  long  escape  the  task  of  educating  everyone  to  or 
into  a  vocation.  The  tendency  is  strongly  in  that  direction  and  the 
principles  of  democracy  make  as  rigorous  demands  for  this  as  for  equality 
in  voting  and  before  the  law;  for  there  can  be  no  equality  in  fact  until 
the  artificial  obstructions  to  giving  everyone  a  chance  to  do  some  job 
efficiently,  to  realize  his  life  through  well-trained  and  qualified  mind  and 
body,  are  broken  down.  But  the  public  in  the  form  of  the  state — some 
form  of  the  state — will  have  to  found  and  carry  on  this  kind  of  education. 
For  vocational  education  under  private  auspices  is  not  promising. 
Either  it  is  not  really  vocational,  as  in  the  case  of  most  so-called  com- 
mercial schools — "business  colleges" — which  profess  to  train  for  business 
in  general,  yet  in  truth  train  for  only  two  or  a  few  lines,  and  for  those 
poorly;  or  it  is  really  vocational — as  in  the  case  of  some  corporations 
of  a  large  or  monopolistic  nature — but  not  auspicious,  since  except  in 
one  or  two  monopolistic  utilities,  as  telephone  companies,  where  labor 
is  immobile  due  to  the  fact  that  the  girls  trained  live  at  home,  labor  is 
too  mobile  to  make  it  profitable  for  a  corporation  or  enterprise  to  train 
employees  to  their  work,  and  there  is  too  great  competition  between 
enterprises. 

But  there  can  be  little  hope  of  establishing  a  system  of  general 
vocational  education.  Such  a  thing  as  general  vocational  education 
is  out  of  the  question  because  of  the  nature  of  vocations.  It  is  not 
possible  to  discover  a  common  denominator  for  all  the  vocations,  not 
even  for  those  in  any  great  line  of  endeavor,  as  agriculture — something 
generally  regarded  as  a  simple  calling.  Practically  all  callings  susceptible 
to  vocational  education  are  specific  callings,  so  that  a  training  for  one 
is  not  a  training  for  another.  Of  course  the  idea  of  education  as  disci- 
pUne,  in  which  case  there  is  supposed  to  be  a  carry-over  from  one  kind  of 
discipline  to  another,  is  discarded.  In  agriculture  there  is  nothing  or 
little  common  to  stock-raising,  fruit-raising,  and  so  on;  consequently 
education  for  one  of  those  callings  is  of  little  service  should  another 
be  taken  up. 

This  conception  strikes  a  stunning  blow  at  the  prevailing  idea  that 
a  generalized  vocational  education  is  possible,  at  least  in  a  restricted 
sense.  There  is  a  widespread  belief  among  educators  that  an  agricul- 
tural community,  for  example,  can  train  boys  for  agriculture  and  girls 


782  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

for  homemaking  by  means  of  the  local  school.     There  might  be  some- 
thing to  this  in  a  one-crop  community,  according  to  the  view  under 
re\aew,  but  not  a  great  deal  because  of  lack  of  equipment,  technical 
knowledge,  and  correlation  of  work  and  training.     But  in  a  community 
of  diversified  farming,  where  various  kinds  of  crops  and  stock  are  pro- 
duced, local  training  would  not  be  a  real  vocational  training  because  a 
common  factor  for  training  purposes  could  not  be  found  for  all  the 
productive  lines.     The  technical  knowledge  and  social  insight  embedded 
in  each  line  is  different  from  the  others,  and,  besides,  the  practice  work 
would  have  to  be  in  each  individually  and  not  in  all  generally.     On 
the  basis  of  this  conception,  the  best  we  could  say  of  the  proposals  in 
behalf  of  generalized  vocational  education  is  that  programs  of  education 
established  on  that  foimdation  are  better  than  nothing,  may  be  con- 
tributive  to  something  in  some  degree,  but  can  only  be  regarded  as  an 
entering  wedge  or  a  way  station  to  the  real  vocational  education  which 
is  to  grow  out  of  such  attempts.     I  am  not  certain  that  Dr.  Snedden 
would  exactly  consent  to  this  last  interpretation.     I  rather  believe  he 
would  say  that  society  should  stop  such  tiddledewinks  efforts  and  do 
the  right  and  real  thing  now.     But  it  is  pretty  evident  that  were  educa- 
tors and  society  convinced  that  what  they  are  doing  is  completely 
wrong,  they  and  it  would  be  too  much  discouraged  to  begin  on  a  new 
task.     In  agriculture,  at  least,  it  seems  to  me,  we  should  go  on  with 
what  has  been  begun,  realizing  that  it  is  not  the  best  that  might  be 
conceived,  but  believing  that  it  is  on   the  right  road  to  something 
better. 

In  the  author's  opinion,  high  schools  and  pubhc  schools  generally 
cannot  realize  vocational  education  successfully,  not  only  because  the 
callings  are  so  diverse  that  small  communities  are  not  able  to  get  a  plant 
large  and  complex  enough  to  train  for  them,  but  also  because  many 
callings  demand  an  equipment  for  the  practical  work— always  to  be 
associated  with  the  process  of  getting  the  technical  knowledge  and  social 
insight— that  is  far  beyond  the  financial  ability  of  such  communities. 
Thus,  to  educate  for  locomotive  engineering  would  require  several  miles 
of  trackage,  a  hundred  locomotives,  and  other  equipment  in  proportion. 
From  this  it  follows  that  vocational  education  will  have  to  be  realized 
by  the  establishment  of  special  schools  to  which  the  youths  to  be  trained 
shall  go  as  they  now  do  to  normal  schools,  medical  schools,  etc.  Some 
of  these  will  be  state  schools  or  schools  for  a  state,  others  district,  some 
local.  Towns  may  co-operate  in  the  establishment  of  local  schools,  one 
kind  of  training  being  given  in  one  place,  another  in  another,  and  so  on. 


REVIEWS  783 

As  to  the  administration  of  vocational  education,  nation,  state, 
district,  and  locality  will  share  inasmuch  as  each  is  a  contributor  to  the 
support  of  the  enterprise.  In  localities,  the  tendency  is  toward  unity 
of  management,  instead  of  management  under  a  dual  system  such  as 
has  been  established  in  certain  states. 

Were  space  allowed,  it  would  be  fruitful  to  review  certain  of  the 
chapters  of  this  volume.  Those  on  vocational  education  for  the  agri- 
cultural callings  and  for  homemaking  and  on  the  practical  arts  are 
remarkable  analyses  of  the  situations.  Dr.  Snedden  is  a  master  at 
analysis  and  many  of  the  results  of  his  analysis  strike  the  mind  of  the 
reader  as  in  the  nature  of  discoveries.  Sociologists  who  have  specialized 
in  some  of  those  directions  considerably  will  be  surprised  to  find  here 
some  things  new  and  worth  while. 

I  believe  this  book  by  Professor  Snedden  will  prove  a  milestone  in 
the  field  of  vocational  education.  He  has  demonstrated  that  many  of 
his  conclusions  are  incontestable.  He  has  torn  up  old  foundations 
relentlessly,  but  for  the  most  part  with  the  conclusiveness  of  demon- 
strative evidence.  His  proposals  are  ideal  in  the  sense  that  it  will  take 
society  a  long  while  to  realize  his  objectives,  but  he  has  created  a  serv- 
iceable steering  gear  for  future  operations.  The  educator  who  can 
think  and  really  wants  to  understand  the  subject  of  vocational 
education  in  itself  and  in  relation  to  society  and  in  relation  to  other 
education  will  find  here  a  most  stimulating  and  valuable  aid. 

John  M.  Gillette 

University  of  North  Dakota 


Outlines  of  Historical  Jurisprudence.  By  Sir  Paul  Vinogradoff, 
F.B.A.     Oxford:  University  Press,  1920.     Pp.  Lx+428.  $8.00. 

This  is  the  first  of  several  volumes  deahng  with  the  subject  indicated 
by  the  title.  This  volume  serves  two  purposes  for  the  series:  (i)  it 
presents  a  general  introduction  to  the  Outlines,  and  (2)  it  covers  the 
first  general  division  of  the  history,  "Tribal  Law."  A  second  volume 
will  deal  with  "Jurisprudence  of  the  Greek  City." 

The  Introduction,  comprising  160  pages,  is  perhaps  the  most 
important  part  of  the  book.  It  takes  up  two  problems:  (i)  the  relation 
of  law  to  other  sciences,  (2)  schools  and  methods  of  jurispudence.  The 
relationship  of  law  to  logic,  psychology,  and  social  science  is  found  to 
be  particularly  close.  Logic,  though  open  to  exaggeration  in  the  hands 
of  lawyers,  gives  an  essential  framework  for  legal  reasoning.    Since  law 


784  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

has  always  to  deal  with  persons,  it  is  fundamentally  based  on  a  psy- 
chology; and  since  law  is  always  a  function  of  the  social  complex,  social 
science  forms  an  indispensable  background  for  its  study.  Jurisprudence 
in  fact  is  but  a  part  of  social  science. 

VinogradofT  groups  the  schools  of  jurisprudence  under  three  heads: 
rationaUsts,  nationaUsts,  and  evolutionists,  and  concludes  with  a  valu- 
able chapter  on  modern  tendencies  in  jurisprudence.  These  modern 
tendencies  are  not  yet  far  enough  advanced  to  rank  as  a  new  epoch  in 
historical  jurisprudence,  but  there  are  certain  new  features  which  deserve 
attention  and  are  "likely  to  advance  toward  new  vistas."  Besides  the 
influence  of  the  evolutionary  conception  and  the  critical  tendency  that 
has  recently  developed,  the  contemporary  social  crisis  is  bringing  a  new 
constructive  point  of  view.  The  "  individuaUstic  order  of  society  is 
giving  way  before  the  impact  of  an  inexorable  process  of  sociaUzation, 
and  the  future  will  depend  for  a  long  time  on  the  course  and  the  extent 
of  this  process." 

The  author  displays  a  knowledge  and  an  appreciation  of  psychology, 
philosophy,  and  social  science  and  of  the  significant  changes  going  on 
in  those  fields  of  thought,  as  well  as  a  profound  knowledge  of  juris- 
prudence. The  chief  value  of  such  a  book  is  that  it  tends  to  arouse 
teachers  and  interpreters  of  law  to  a  consciousness  that  their  chief 
function  in  society  is  not  that  of  inculcating  finished  rules,  but  that  of 
building  up  the  conception  of  law  as  one  phase  in  an  endless  process  of 
adaptation  and  equipping  students  with  a  scientific  point  of  view  and 
method  for  criticism  of  legal  rules  and  institutions. 

Walter  B.  Bodenhafer 

Washington  University 


Field  Work  and  Social  Research.  By  F.  Stuart  Chapin,  Ph.D. 
New  York:   The  Century  Company,  1920.     Pp.  224.     $1.75. 

Under  this  title  Professor  Chapin  has  given  us  a  book  on  method — 
method  in  conducting  field  work  in  the  social  sciences.  Believing  that 
much  valuable  information  on  this  subject  was  scattered  through  the 
publications  of  government  and  private  agencies,  he  set  about  putting 
a  considerable  amount  of  it  into  permanent  reference  form. 

The  book  is  divided  into  three  parts.  Part  I  deals  with  the  place 
of  field  work  in  social  research  and  with  the  critical  examination  of 
documentary  sources  of  information  which  must  precede  good  field  work. 
Part  II  takes  up  the  scope  and  organization  of  field  work,  pointing  out 


REVIEWS  785 

that  it  falls  into  three  main  types:  (i)  case  work — the  intensive  inves- 
tigation of  individuals  and  families;  (2)  sampling — the  selection  for 
study  of  a  representative  portion  less  than  the  whole;  and  (3)  complete 
enimieration,  as  in  a  government  census.  Attention  is  also  given  to 
several  different  methods  followed  in  planning  the  field  work  of  particular 
investigations  and  the  principles  involved.  Part  III  deals  with  special 
problems  connected  with  field  work,  more  particularly  the  purpose  and 
preparation  of  schedules,  and  the  editing,  classification,  transcribing, 
tabulation,  and  interpretation  of  field-work  data. 

There  are  a  number  of  minor  inaccuracies;  but  the  book  is  valuable 
and  will  prove  useful  to  those  interested  in  social  research,  for  Professor 
Chapin  has  added  to  our  fund  of  material  in  a  field  where  contributions 
are  welcome — that  is  to  say,  in  the  matter  of  methods  and  procedures. 
Credit  is  due  him,  moreover,  for  the  conception  of  the  importance  of  a 
carefully  worked-out  technique  in  this  kind  of  field  work. 

Shelby  M.  Harrison 

Russell  Sage  Foundation 


Human  Geography.    By  JeanBrunhes.     Chicago:  RandMcNally 

&  Co.,  1920.     Pp.  xvi+648. 
Principles  of  Human  Geography.    By  Ellsworth  Huntington 
and  Sumner  W.  Cushing.     New  York:  John  Wiley  &  Sons, 
1921.     Pp.  xiv+430.     $2.50. 

"Human  geography"  is  another  name  for  what  Frederick  Ratzel 
first  made  popular  under  the  title  of  anthropogeography.  It  is  an 
attempt  to  put  our  present  knowledge  of  the  relations  between  man 
and  his  geographic  environment  into  a  systematic  form  and  to  outUne 
the  methods  and  problems  of  further  investigation.  Between  the  works 
of  Ratzel  and  Brunhes  there  are,  however,  some  striking  differences. 
Brunhes,  for  example,  puts  more  emphasis  upon  methods  and  is  more 
circumspect  and  less  genial  in  his  deductions.  Ratzel,  in  a  compara- 
tively new  field,  wrote  extensively  and  expansively,  throwing  out  gen- 
eralizations that  were  suggestive  and  prophetic,  but  not  always  justified 
by  the  facts.  Brunhes'  work  is  a  scrupulous  effort  to  keep  the  subject 
within  the  limits  of  geography,  to  point  out  the  connections  between 
human  geography,  sociology,  and  ethnology,  but  to  preserve  the  limits 
of  the  different  disciplines. 

The  fundamental  facts  of  human  geography  for  Brunhes  are  position 
and  commimication  between  positions.    These  two  elements  are  typified 


786  TEE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

for  him  by  the  house  and  the  road.  All  permanent  human  habitations 
are  included  under  the  one  and  all  forms  of  communication  are  included 
under  the  other.  A  city  is  a  complex  of  the  house  and  the  road,  struc- 
tures divided  and  connected  by  streets. 

Human  geography  thus  reduces  itself  to  an  investigation  of  the 
manner  in  which  the  organization  of  life  within  the  house,  within  the 
communities,  i.e.,  village  or  city,  and  within  the  typical  geographical 
areas  (islands)  is  determined  by  geographical  facts,  that  is  to  say,  soil 
and  water,  flora  and  fauna,  coal  and  other  minerals. 

From  the  point  of  view  of  the  sociologist  the  most  interesting  chap- 
ters in  the  book  are  those  entitled  "Beyond  the  Essential  Facts,"  in 
which  the  writer  discusses  the  relations  between  geography,  ethnology, 
sociology,  and  history,  and  the  last  chapter  entitled  "The  Geographic 
Spirit,"  in  which  he  indicates  the  varied  directions  in  which  human 
geography  is  likely  to  be  extended  and  the  role  which  it  is  to  play  in  the 
future  in  relation  to  the  other  social  sciences. 

The  volume  by  Huntington  and  Gushing,  Principles  of  Human 
Geography,  is  something  quite  different.  It  is  not  concerned  with 
principles  of  interpretation  and  methods  of  investigation  but  with  the 
presentation  of  positive  facts.  It  is  a  sketch  of  physical  geography  to 
which  is  added  an  interpretation  of  human  relationship  so  far  as  they 
are  determined  by  geographical  conditions.  Human  Geography  is  an 
attempt  to  apply  geographical  methods  and  the  geographical  point  of 
view  to  relatively  new  fields,  a  book  not  merely  for  the  schoolroom  but 
for  the  student.  Principles  of  Human  Geography,  on  the  other  hand, 
is  a  body  of  fact  organized  and  presented  for  use  in  the  classroom. 

Robert  E.  Park 

University  of  Chicago 


The  Rural  Community,  Ancient  and  Modern.    By  Newell  Leroy 

Sims.    New    York:     Charles    Scribner's    Sons,    1920.     Pp. 

xxiii-f9i6.     $4.50. 

Professor  Sims  has  produced  a  selection  of  excellent  readings  on  the 

various  phases  of  rural  community  life.     The  text  is  divided  into  three 

parts.    Part  I  gives  illustrations  of  primitive,  medieval,  and  early 

American  villages  and  closes  with  a  discussion  of  the  disintegration  of 

the  earlier  type  of  village  community  organization.     Part  II  discusses 

types,  institutions,  and  evolution  of  the  modem  rural  conmiunity. 

Part  III  is  devoted  to  the  problems  as  illustrated  by  surveys  made  in 


REVIEWS  787 

various  parts  of  the  United  States,  the  program  of  improvement  of  rural 
life,  and  the  agencies  for  improvement  and  their  co-ordination. 

The  selections  describing  life  in  primitive  villages  are  especially 
valuable.  Charts  are  included  showing  the  division  of  fields  for  hand 
cultivation.  The  survivals  of  the  primitive  village  land  division  in 
modem  life  has  had  a  vital  influence  on  determining  methods  of  agri- 
culture in  Europe  as  compared  with  conditions  in  America.  And 
Americans  may  be  thankful  that  they  have  been  able  to  develop  their 
agriculture  free  from  many  of  the  handicaps  of  land  division  still  existing 
across  the  water. 

The  closing  selections  outlining  plans  for  unified  community  organi- 
zation through  community  councils  should  have  a  wide  influence  on 
future  smaller  group  activities. 

Dr.  Sim's  discussions  of  what  constitutes  a  community  are  a  real 
contribution  to  this  much  talked-of  but  as  yet  poorly  defined  subject. 

The  text  is  an  important  addition  to  the  literature  of  rural  life  in 

that  it  makes  readily  available  to  the  student  much  of  the  best  hterature 

that  has  appeared. 

Paul  L.  Vogt 

Philadelphia 


Die  Entwickliing  der  Hegelschen  Sozialphilosophie.     By  Friedrich 
Btixow.    Leipzig:  FelLxMeiner,  1920.    Pp.158.    Paper,  M.  5. 

The  reviewer's  first  reaction  to  this  monograph  is  a  surprised  sense 
of  indifference  to  its  subject-matter.  Even  a  sociologist  who,  in  years 
which  seem  longer  gone  by  than  they  really  are,  has  diligently  studied 
Hegel  from  beginning  to  end  now  wonders  how  he  ever  convinced 
himself  that  it  was  worth  while.  The  change  is  not  due  to  a  reversal 
of  attitude  toward  men  and  things  German,  as  such,  since  the  war. 
Our  present  temper  has  as  little  use  for  any  "social  philosophy"  in  the 
Hegelian  sense  as  it  has  for  a  theology  based  on  the  assumption  that  the 
world  was  made  and  contemplated  with  pride  as  a  finished  product  in 
the  course  of  a  calendar  week.  Simply  because  we  are  out  of  sorts  with 
all  attempts  to  subsume  human  experience  under  categories,  and  then 
to  interpret  human  experience  by  a  logic  of  these  subjective  constructions, 
an  American  sociologist  who  today,  from  the  strictly  sociological  angle, 
had  the  slightest  interest  in  what  Hegel  thought  would  be  a  curiosity. 
Why  he  thought  it  might  be  the  unknown  quantity  in  a  sociological 
problem,  but  we  need  our  energies  for  more  importunate  problems  than 


788  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

that.  It  is  to  be  hoped  that  few  American  sociologists  are  such  philis- 
tines  as  to  ignore  the  tremendous  importance  of  Hegel  in  the  evolution 
of  human  thought;  but  by  that  same  token,  because  we  do  take  knowl- 
edge of  human  thought  as  an  evolution,  we  realize  that,  measured  by 
thought  qualities,  it  is  a  longer  distance  back  from  what  we  now  regard 
as  objectivity  to  Hegel  than  from  Hegel  to  Socrates. 

This  little  book  is  hardly  more  than  a  prospectus.  It  consists  of 
an  account  of  the  antecedents  of  Hegel  the  producer  of  the  Phanomeno- 
logie.  Tradition  may  have  ungenerously  associated  this  book  with  the 
battle  of  Jena,  but  the  social  philosophy  which  in  the  germ  was  in  the 
book  makes  Uttle  more  appeal  to  American  sociologists  than  the  state- 
craft of  Frederick  William  III  does  to  modern  democrats.  Less  than 
two  concluding  pages  are  devoted  to  "the  completed  Hegelian  system." 
Another  volume  containing  a  digest  of  the  system  is  hinted  at.  The 
appendix  (p.  154)  contains,  in  addition  to  well-known  sources,  only  two 
titles  later  than  1914.  The  monograph  is  worthy  of  the  attention  of 
serious  students  of  Hegel  as  a  philosopher,  but  it  cannot  be  recommended 
to  sociologists. 

Albion  W.  Small 

UNrVERSITY   OF   CHICAGO 


United  States  Housing  Corporation  Report.  Volume  I:  Organization, 
Policies,  Transactions.  Edited  by  James  Ford.  Washington, 
D.C.:    Government  Printing  Office,  1920. 

Soon  after  hostilities  in  Europe  were  ended  there  was  a  concerted 
effort  on  the  part  of  real  estate  and  building  interests  to  bring  about  a 
quick  liquidation  of  the  affairs  of  the  United  States  Housing  Corporation 
and  to  salvage  whatever  was  still  in  the  hands  of  the  Corporation  by  way 
of  real  estate  properties.  The  volume  issued  under  Professor  Ford's 
editorship  shows  that,  whatever  fear  we  may  have  had  of  extravagance 
and  inefficiency  of  government  enterprise  in  the  production  of  war 
materials,  such  fear  was  not  justified  in  the  case  of  the  United  States 
Housing  Corporation.  Without  previous  experience,  without  an  estab- 
lished machinery  for  the  adminstration  of  home-building  work,  and 
without  sufficient  time  in  which  to  develop  adequate  methods  for  the 
handling  of  pressing  problems  of  housing  war-workers  in  regions  scattered 
over  widely  distributed  areas,  the  Housing  Corporation  has  established 
a  record  that  justly  aroused  concern  among  real  estate  dealers  and 
builders  regarding  the  possible  competition  of  the  government  in  the 
building  of  homes. 


REVIEWS  789 

Those  who  are  inclined  to  be  skeptical  regarding  the  possibilities 
for  meeting  the  housing  shortage  through  government  appropriations 
and  under  government  administration  would  do  well  to  read  this  volume. 
It  shows  not  only  the  reasons  for  organizing  the  Corporation  and  its 
general  policies,  but  it  points  out  ways  and  means  of  administration 
which  if  applied  to  private  building  enterprise  would  make  possible 
the  achievement  of  much  better  results  than  are  at  present  afforded  by 
the  ordinary  business  building  enterprise. 

The  standards  of  construction,  the  human  elements  involved  in  the 
planning  of  each  housing  scheme,  the  town-planning  principles  applied, 
and  the  efforts  to  solve  the  engineering  problems  connected  with  building 
of  homes  seem  to  have  been  handled  in  a  manner  that  is  not  only  credit- 
able to  those  who  were  connected  with  the  enterprise,  but  to  the  country 
as  a  whole.  No  progressive  builder  can  afford  to  disregard  the  vast  and 
valuable  experience  of  the  United  States  Housing  Corporation,  and  that 
experience  is  clearly  and  convincingly  stated  in  the  first  volume  of  the 

Corporation's  report. 

Carol  Aronovici 
Belvedere,  Cal. 

Proceedings  of  the  International  Conference  of  Women  Physicians. 
New  York:  The  Woman's  Press,  1920.  6  vols.  $3.00  the 
set.     (Paper.) 

In  the  autimin  of  19 19,  an  international  conference  of  women  physi- 
cians was  held  in  New  York  City  under  the  auspices  of  the  Y.W.C.A. 
The  volumes  here  noted  contain  in  full  the  addresses  and  remarks  of  the 
speakers  and  delegates  who  attended. 

The  conference  was  not  limited  to  the  consideration  of  medical 
topics,  but  covered  also  industry,  economics,  education,  clothing, 
psychology,  and  sociology,  experts  in  these  various  fields  being  invited 
to  address  the  medical  delegates. 

The  volumes  dealing  with  the  health  of  women  and  children  are 
especially  significant  as  establishing  the  viewpoint  of  modern  women 
physicians.  The  old  notion  of  woman  as  a  natural,  chronic  invalid 
should  be  replaced  by  ideals  of  health,  hygiene,  and  energetic  participa- 
tion in  the  work  of  the  world.  For  the  realization  of  these  ideals,  health 
education,  dress  reform,  maternity  insurance,  control  of  venereal  diseases, 
and  the  single  standard  of  morals  are  believed  to  be  the  chief  means. 
Birth  control,  as  fundamental  to  the  improvement  of  the  condition  of 
women  and  children,  is  also  freely  recognized. 


790  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

In  the  discussions  of  mental  life,  the  speakers  identify  psychology 
with  the  system  of  thought  generally  called  psychoanalysis.  The  con- 
cepts of  Freud  and  Jung  are  uncritically  accepted  as  satisfactory  expla- 
nations of  human  behavior,  and  are  regarded  as  estabUshed  guides  for 
educational  procedure.  The  reader  gains  an  impression  that  very  few 
of  those  speaking  are  acquainted  with  psychology  as  understood  by  the 
experimental  and  educational  psychologists  of  our  day. 

As  is  inevitable  when  the  complete  verbatim  proceedings  of  such  a 
conference  are  pubhshed,  much  is  included  that  is  not  worth  printing. 
To  offer  an  exhaustive  critique  of  the  contents  would  be  to  exceed  the 
intentions  of  this  review.  It  was  evidently  not  the  purpose  of  the  con- 
ference to  add  to  knowledge,  as  original  research  is  not  presented.  It 
was  the  purpose,  rather,  to  discuss  points  of  view.  The  philosophy 
emanating  from  the  conference  on  this  basis  shows  women  physicians 
to  be  in  line  with  the  most  progressive  aims  of  women  at  large. 

Leta  S.  Holltngworth 

Teachers  College,  Columbia  UNrvERsrxY 


League  of  Nations.  A  chapter  in  the  history  of  the  movement. 
By  Theodore  Marburg,  M. A.,  LL.D.  New  York:  TheMac- 
millan  Co.,  1917.     139  pp.     $0.60. 

The  first  part  of  this  volume  takes  up  the  conclusions  of  a  private 
study  group  of  eminent  scholars  in  regard  to  the  organization  and  working 
of  a  league  of  nations.  This  organization  would  consist  of  a  Legis- 
lative Assembly,  made  up  of  representatives  from  all  the  nation  members. 
The  brains  of  this  would  be  an  executive  committee  but  there  would  be  a 
Council  of  Conciliation,  which  would  be  invested  with  the  power  of  in- 
junction, and  an  International  Court  of  fifteen  judges,  who  would  reside 
permanently  at  the  seat  of  the  court. 

In  addition  to  incidents  in  the  history  of  the  organization  of  the 
League  of  Peace  (later  changed  to  League  to  Enforce  Peace),  the  author 
takes  up  some  of  the  special  problems  that  would  confront  a  league  of 
nations.  Among  these  are  the  backward  nation,  race,  and  alien  govern- 
ments, sovereignty,  and  war.  Also  a  few  criticisms  of  a  league  are 
considered. 

The  volume  closes  with  expressions  of  opinion  in  favor  of  a  league  of 
nations  by  leading  statesmen  in  America  and  Europe.  While  an  inter- 
esting and  very  suggestive  little  volume,  it  of  course  makes  no  attempt 

at  a  complete  treatment  of  the  subject.  ^    ^    _ 

G.  S.  Dow 

UNrVERSITY  OF   NeW  MEXICO 


REVIEWS  791 

The  English  Middle  Class.  By  R.  H.  Gretton.  New  York: 
The  Macmillan  Co.,  191 7.  Pp.  xii+238.  $3.50. 
Distinctly  suggestive  of  the  "economic  interpretation  of  history" 
but  quite  free  from  any  "taint"  of  radical  propaganda  is  Gretton's 
history  of  the  Enghsh  middle  class.  Beginning  with  a  definition  of 
the  middle  class  in  terms  of  its  attitude  toward  money,  he  develops  the 
thesis  that  each  stage  of  its  growth  has  been  correlated  with  an  important 
change  in  the  history  of  currency.  Thus  its  first  definite  appearance 
in  the  fourteenth  century  coincides  with  the  release  of  money  from  the 
treasuries  of  the  Knights  Templar  and  the  hoards  of  the  Jews.  Its 
displacement  of  the  old  military  caste  was  facilitated  by  fresh  supplies 
of  bullion  from  America.  Its  eighteenth-century  commercialism  was 
accompanied  by  new  conceptions  of  exchange  and  new  methods  of  taxa- 
tion. Its  later  industrialism  was  made  possible  by  the  growth  of  the 
banking  system.  Finally  its  modern  inclusiveness  has  coincided  with 
discoveries  which  have  placed  coined  money  within  the  command  of 
practically  the  whole  community.  Particularistic  though  it  be,  Gretton's 
study  is  well  worth  correlating  with  other  views  of  the  middle  class. 

Stuart  A.  Queen 
University  of  Illinois 


The  Gospel  for  a  Working  World.  By  Harry  Frederick  Ward. 
New  York  Missionary  Education  Movement  of  the  United 
States  and  Canada.  1918.  Pp.  xv+ 249+ Bibliography + In- 
dex.    $0.40. 

The  purpose  of  this  volume  is  to  state  the  conditions  in  the  industrial 
world,  and  to  show  how  the  church  can  remedy  these  conditions  by 
adopting  an  adequate  program  of  presenting  the  teachings  of  Jesus  to 
all  parties  in  the  industrial  process.  "It  seeks  to  make  the  gospel  the 
inspiring  force  and  power  of  the  whole  social  organism. " 

The  book  contains  eight  chapters  with  illustrations  produced  from 
actual  photographs  taken  from  life  in  industry.  The  first  four  chapters, 
"The  Right  to  Live,"  "The  Day's  Work,"  "The  Pay  Envelope," 
"War  or  Peace,"  deal  very  pointedly  with  the  seamy  side  of  the  labor 
world  and  portray  in  some  instances  the  seeming  bias  of  the  author  in 
favor  of  the  ultraradicals  (see  pages  loi,  102,  116,  132,  138,  149,  154). 

In  the  last  four  chapters,  "Not  by  Bread  Alone,"  "Master  and 
Man"  "Men  and  Things,"  "New  Frontiers,"  the  writer  takes  up  the 
constructive  task  of  the  church  in  carrying  on  its  mission  to  the  working 


792  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

world.     But  even  here  the  author's  sympathies  sag  at  times  in  favor  of 
the  ultraradicals  (seepages  151,  154). 

Written  and  published  at  the  time  of  the  greatest  struggle  the  world 
has  experienced  in  history,  with  the  triumph  in  arms  of  righteousness 
over  the  most  diabolical  wickedness  imaginable,  supported  by  an 
efl5cient  labor  power  in  Germany,  so  long  as  loot  was  in  sight,  and  by  the 
ultraradicals  in  the  United  States,  in  Russia,  and  elsewhere,  it  seems 
to  lack  that  moral  discrimination  that  an  adequate  gospel  to  the  working 
world  at  this  time  so  urgently  demands. 

Edwin  L.  Earp 

Drew  Theological  Seminary 


The  Passing  of  the  County  Jail;  Individualization  of  Misdemeanants 
through  a  Unified  Correctional  System.  By  Stuart  Alfred 
Queen.  Menasha,  Wis.:  The  Collegiate  Press,  (G.  Banta 
Pub.),  1920.     xiii+158pp.     $1.50. 

Dr.  Queen's  studies  of  the  county  jails  of  Cahfornia  are  already  well 
and  favorably  known.  As  an  ofi&cial  jail  inspector,  and  later  as  secre- 
tary of  the  California  State  Board  of  Charities  and  Corrections,  he  col- 
lected and  published  in  ofiScial  reports  the  facts  relating  to  the  jails  of 
that  state.  The  present  volume  is  in  a  measure  an  outgrowth  of  these 
earlier  studies,  and  the  author  draws  very  largely  upon  his  California  ex- 
perience and  upon  California  data  in  the  chapters  dealing  with  jail  condi- 
tions and  prisoners.  Evidence  has  been  collected,  however,  from  other 
states  to  show  that  the  county-jail  system  in  other  parts  of  the  country 
is  as  bad  or  worse  than  that  of  California. 

But  the  book  deals  largely  with  constructive  policies,  and  some  of 
the  most  successful  substitutes  for  the  old  county-jail  system  are 
described,  notably  the  District  of  Columbia  Workhouse  at  Occaquam 
and  the  Swiss  and  Belgium  farm  colonies.  The  title  of  the  book  in- 
dicates that  the  old  county-jail  system  is  being  done  away  with,  but 
when  Dr.  Queen  assembles  his  evidence  on  this  point,  the  reader  wonders 
whether  the  title  is  not  perhaps  a  too  optimistic  one.  It  is  to  be  regretted 
that  Dr.  Queen  did  not  include  a  study  of  the  adult  probation  system 
in  the  chapter  on  "Substitutes  for  the  County  Jail  System."  It  is 
probably  true  that  the  "system"  will  disappear  not  so  much  because 
new  and  better  penal  institutions  in  the  shape  of  farm  colonies  are  sub- 
stituted but  because  such  institutions  will  become  unnecessary  as  a 
result  of  prohibition,  probation,  and  the  substitution  of  the  instalment- 


REVIEWS  793 

fine  system  for  the  old  system  of  "laying  out"  fines  in  county  jails. 
There  is  at  any  rate  reason  to  believe  that  the  former  emphasis  on  "prison 
reform"  will  give  way  in  the  future  to  the  finding  of  substitutes  for  im- 
prisonment. 

Much  is  said  about  the  individualization  of  punishment;  and  in 
chapter  iv  the  writer  claims  that  the  individualization  of  felons  has 
received  more  attention  than  the  individualization  of  misdemeanants, 
and  he  believes  that  the  misdemeanant  has  been  neglected  in  part 
because  of  the  maintenance  of  the  old  and  somewhat  irrational  distinc- 
tion between  the  two  groups  of  offenders.  Whether  these  statements 
are  accepted  or  not,  they  have  led  the  writer  to  an  interesting  and  useful 
feature  of  the  volume — the  tabulation  of  penalties  provided  by  different 
states  for  identical  offenses.  Thus  cattle-stealing  in  Wisconsin  is  a 
misdemeanor  with  a  penalty  of  imprisonment  for  ten  days  to  one  year 
and  a  fine  of  S5  to  $100;  in  Illinois  the  same  offense  is  a  felony  with  a 
penalty  of  imprisonment  from  three  to  twenty  years.  "Drawing  a 
weapon"  in  Louisiana  is  a  misdemeanor  with  a  penalty  of  imprison- 
ment from  ten  to  sixty  days  and  a  fine  of  from  $10  to  $300;  in  New  York 
the  same  offense  is  a  felony  with  a  penalty  of  seven  years'  imprisonment 
and  a  fine  of  $1,000.  This  lack  of  uniformity  in  our  state  criminal 
codes  is  a  matter  of  great  interest  and  importance  to  criminologists, 
and  Dr.  Queen  has  rendered  a  service  in  revising  and  bringing  down 
to  date  the  study  in  this  field  begun  by  Dr.  Wines  for  the  Eleventh 

Census. 

E.  Abbott 
UNrvT:RsiTY  OF  Chicago 


RECENT  LITERATURE 


NOTES  AND  ABSTRACTS 

This  Changing  World — The  Expansion  of  Personality. — The  inanimate  world  is 
coming  more  under  the  control  of  human  thought  by  the  multiplication  of  the 
individuals  and  by  the  multiplication  of  the  individual  through  mechanical  inventions. 
The  measure  of  one's  personality  is  the  amount  of  energy  he  can  master.  In  over- 
coming the  limitations,  (i)  of  time,  man  has  been  magnified  by  the  machine,  his  life 
extended  by  a  greater  knowledge  of  hygiene,  more  rational  mode  of  living;  (2)  of 
space  by  means  of  modern  mechanisms  of  social  communication  such  as  the  wireless, 
the  telegraph,  and  mail,  he  has  extended  his  power  and  personality  to  all  parts  of  the 
world;   (3)  of  altitude,  man  has  used  the  airplane  and  the  steel-supported  skyscrapers; 

(4)  of  night  and  day,  man  has  used  the  artificial  light  such  as  electricity  and  gas; 

(5)  of  cold  and  heat,  man  has  used  devices  not  only  to  keep  the  bodily  temperature 
constant,  but  also  to  preserve  food  products;  (6)  of  climate  and  season  by  means  of 
migration,  irrigation,  reclamation,  or  modern  heating  apparatus;  (7)  of  food  supply, 
man  has  multiplied  the  production  of  the  soil  through  intensive  cultivation,  sci- 
entific fertilization,  and  by  modern  methods  of  preparation  of  food;  (8)  of  natural 
materials,  man  has  learned  to  make  and  combine  metals,  building  materials,  precious 
stones,  etc. ;  (9)  of  the  fine  arts  by  a  broader  use  of  the  best  literature,  instrumental 
and  vocal  music,  of  paintings,  etc.;  (10)  of  language,  race,  sect,  class,  and  nation  by 
wider  social  communication;  (11)  of  personal  freedom,  i.e.,  freedom  of  thought,  of 
speech,  and  of  action,  the  tendency  for  the  last  five  hundred  years  has  been  to  enlarge 
them;  (12)  of  ignorance  through  increase  of  knowledge,  mankind  is  able  to  abolish 
those  restrictions  of  human  activity  that  are  unnecessary  and  useless.  All  of  these 
triumphs  have  been  gained  through  applied  science  and  especially  through  the  utiliza- 
tion of  external  energy. — Edwin  E.  Slosson,  The  Independent,  Ja.nua.Ty,  1921.    C.  N. 

Mental  Contagion  and  Popular  Crazes. — There  are  two  principles  that  dominate 
abnormal  popular  movements  or  "pandemic  psychoses."  The  first  is  the  emotional 
or  sentimental  factor.  When  a  mere  emotion  becomes  the  chief  motive  of  conduct, 
we  have  reversal  of  normal  psychology.  The  mental  processes  of  children  offer  a 
good  example.  They  argue  and  act  from  their  emotions,  for  they  have  not  developed 
the  reasoning  faculties  sufficiently  to  control  conduct.  The  second  factor  is  imitation. 
We  owe  most  of  our  attainments  to  others,  and  we  have  come  by  them  by  the  simple, 
process  of  copying  them.  It  is  by  imitation  largely  and  unconsciously  that  mental 
contagion  spreads  in  an  abnormal  environment,  both  domestic  and  world-wide.  The 
automobile  mania  is  one  result  of  a  pandemic  psychosis.  Zionism  is  another  example 
based  on  a  disordered  sentiment.  The  aspiration  of  the  pacifists  is  an  abnormal  sign 
due  to  an  avoidance  of  conflict,  or  it  may  be  regarded  as  one  of  the  "repressed 
emotions."  Such  popular  movements  as  the  crusades,  prohibition,  industrial  unrest 
as  expressed  in  strikes  derive  their  energy  from  sentiments  and  imitation.  The 
present  age  is  neurasthenic  from  war-shock  and  industrialism,  and  this  state  of  nerves 
provides  good  ground  for  all  kinds  of  pandemic  psychosis. — James  Hendrie  Lloyd, 
Scribner's  Magazine,  February,  1921.  C.  N. 

Garvey's  Empire  of  Ethiopia. — Marcus  Garvey  as  head  of  the  Universal  Negro 
Improvement  Association  and  African  Communities  League  of  the  World,  believes 
in  a  world-movement  for  the  unification  of  political  and  economic  interests  of  all 
negroes  everywhere.  He  believes  that  as  Europe  and  America  are  the  home  of  the 
white  man,  and  Asia  of  the  yellow  man,  that  Africa  should  be  for  the  negro  race. 
This  growing  race  consciousness  was  stimulated  by  the  participation  of  two  million 
negroes  in  the  world-war  who  now  desire  liberty  and  democracy  as  a  race — a  thing 

794 


RECENT  LITERATURE  795 

for  which  they  claim  they  were  asked  to  fight  in  Europe.  An  international  con- 
vention composed  of  three  thousand  negro  delegates  met  in  New  York  in  December 
to  frame  a  bill  of  rights  for  the  negro  race.  They  complained  of  many  grievances  such 
as  lynching,  Jim-Crowism,  disfranchisement,  industrial  exploitation,  segregation,  and 
various  other  kinds  of  discrimination.  The  convention  elected  officials  of  this  new 
"supergovernment"  of  negroes,  including  Garvey  as  provisional  president  of  Africa 
and  Dr.  J.  W.  Eason  as  leader  of  the  15,000,000  negroes  in  the  United  States  who 
should  obey  his  orders  in  all  things  pertaining  to  the  negro  race.  The  mayor  of 
Monrovia,  the  Liberian  capital,  was  made  "Pope  of  the  Negro  Race"  and  head  of  the 
religious  organization  which  is  adapted  from  the  model  provided  by  the  Catholic 
church.  He  would  decide,  in  case  of  America's  entry  into  another  war,  whether  the 
negroes  should  participate.  A  $10,000,000  commercial  enterprise  was  also  approved 
to  be  called  the  Black  Star  Line,  which  has  already  bought  three  steamships  to  be 
operated  by  negroes,  and  plying  negro  freight  and  passenger  trade  for  the  negroes' 
own  pecuniary  benefit,  between  Africa,  the  West  Indies,  America,  and  later  possibly 
South  America. — Truman  Hughes  Talley,  World's  Work,  January,  1921.      K.  E.  B. 

Intelligence  and  Behavior. — The  doctrine  of  intelligence  embodied  in  the  volume 
entitled  Creative  Intelligence  has  recently  been  subjected  to  a  keen  analysis  by  Professor 
Lovejoy.  The  main  contention  of  his  articles  are  summarized  as  follows:  The 
pragmatic  doctrine  of  intelligence,  with  its  emphasis  upon  the  quality  of  "creativeness," 
is  an  assertion  of  the  efficacy  of  consciousness  in  the  control  of  behavior.  Negatively 
it  is  a  rejection  of  the  idea  that  thinking  is  "a  vast  irrelevancy,  having  no  part  in  the 
causation  of  man's  behavior  or  in  the  shaping  of  his  fortunes."  This  assertion  of 
efficacy  is  coupled  with  the  denial  of  the  interaction  between  mind  and  matter.  The 
denial  of  interaction  is  not  based  on  a  study  of  the  facts  but  springs  from  a  prejudice 
against  the  belief  in  the  existence  of  psychic  "entities"  or  "states."  The  attempt  to 
give  an  account  of  intelligent  behavior  without  having  recourse  to  such  entities  rests 
on  an  "incomplete  anal3rsis."  The  point  of  departure  is  the  contention  that  conscious 
behavior  can  be  explained  in  terms  of  body  and  environment,  without  the  intervention 
of  a  third  order  of  facts  as  distinct  links  in  the  causal  chain,  namely,  mind  or  psychic 
state.  The  central  feature  of  the  doctrine  is  the  contention  that  consciousness  is 
identifiable  with  a  certain  unique  type  of  control.  It  involves  a  peculiar  kind  of  stimu- 
lus which  sets  on  foot  activities  directed  toward  getting  a  better  stimulus.  Illustra- 
tions of  this  "psychic"  element  are  taken  by  preference  from  situations  of  doubt  and 
uncertainty  in  which  the  "unfinished"  character  of  the  stimulus  is  sufficiently  promi- 
nent to  be  recognized.  In  so  far  as  a  stimulus  is  of  this  sort  behavior  becomes  "forward- 
looking."  It  is  behavior  that  is  "controlled  by  the  future."  A  stimulus  is  sought 
(by  the  method  of  trial  and  error)  which  will  adjust  the  conflicting  reactions.  From 
this  standpoint,  the  psychic  is  a  distinguishable  aspect,  but  not  a  separate  link,  in 
the  chain  of  causation.  Behavior  is  conscious  or  intelligent  only  because  the  process 
as  a  whole  presents  a  specifiable  differentiating  trait. — B.  H.  Bode,  Journal  of  P/»- 
/p50/>/zy,  January  6,  1921.  O.  B.  Y. 

The  Social  Need  for  Scientific  Psychology. — It  is  difficult  to  explain  to  the 
layman  the  difference  between  the  real  psychologist  and  the  alleged  psychologist. 
A  fairly  accurate  basis  of  discrimination  may  be  based  on  the  indorsement  of  the 
American  Psychological  Association.  The  conditions  attending  the  present  wide 
interest  in  psychology  and  pseudo-psychology  make  it  imperative  to  guard  the  member- 
ship in  the  .'\merican  Association  more  carefully  in  the  future  than  in  the  past,  and 
to  admit  to  official  recognition  no  one  who  may  use  his  indorsement  to  the  detriment 
of  science.  We  find  in  the  list  of  accredited  psychologists  those  reactionaries  who 
would  have  no  advance  beyond  the  conceptions  of  John  Locke  and  Wilhelm  Wundt, 
and  also  those  radicals  who  would  altogether  abandon  psychology  as  it  is  historically 
known  and  would  admit  of  no  biological  science  beyond  physiology.  The  two  great 
and  inexorable  conditions  laid  upon  every  science  are  that  it  shall  in  the  first  place  be 
empirical,  and  that  in  the  second  place  it  shall  be  logical.  The  movements  which 
threaten  to  disrupt  or  destroy  psychology  can  be  analyzed  into  omissions  of  scrupulous 
regard  for  one  or  the  other  of  these  great  principles.  William  James  and  Malbranche 
have  been  guilty  of  constructing  systems  on  a  defective  empirical  basis.     The  most 


796 


THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 


recent  construction  of  this  a  priori  sort  is  the  psychology  which  calls  itself  Behaviorism, 
which  reaches  a  conclusion  apparently  quite  different  from  that  of  reactionary  psy- 
chology, but  by  the  same  method.  The  effects  of  the  neglect  of  logical  consistency 
are  perhaps  most  strikingly  illustrated  in  the  system  or  group  of  systems  variously 
known  as  "psychoanalysis,"  "Freudianism,"  or  "the  newer  psychology."  It  lacks 
an  empirical  basis,  but  reaches  its  most  astonishing  results  by  the  complacent  ignoring 
of  the  elementary  principles  of  deductive  and  inductive  reasoning.  Psychoanalysis 
threatens  the  older  psychology  not  so  much  with  demolition  as  absorption.  Scientific 
psychology  is  the  sure  antidote  for  Freudianism  because  of  its  three  essential  character- 
istics, its  logical  method,  its  empirical  basis,  and  its  fundamental  working  hj^othesis 
that  the  fact  of  consciousness  is  uniformly  connected  with  reaction. — ^Knight  Dunlap, 
Scientific  Monthly,  December,  1920.  O.  B.  Y. 

The  Psychology  of  the  Thrill. — In  his  most  primitive  state  man's  conduct  was 
largely  impulsive  in  its  nature.  His  restrictions  in  doing  whatever  he  wished  were 
governed  solely  by  his  physical  power  and  skill  in  protecting  himself  from  his  enemies 
and  in  securing  the  gratifications  of  his  desires.  The  constant  danger  that  attended 
his  survival  caused  him  to  be  in  more  or  less  of  a  continual  state  of  heightened  e.xcite- 
ment.  It  \^as  only  when  overcome  by  physical  exhaustion  that  he  relaxed  his  vigilance 
and  sought  rest.  From  a  study  of  the  human  body,  scientists  have  come  to  the 
conclusion  that  man  led  such  a  mode  of  existence  for  many  thousands  of  years  and 
that  he  is  not  altogether  adapted  to  his  present  customs  of  living.  His  impulsiveness 
of  action  has  been  subjected  to  a  certain  degree  of  repression.  As  a  result  the  indi- 
vidual is  often  forced  to  seek  relief  by  relaxing  his  suppressive  processes  and  indulging 
in  some  sort  of  exciting  activity.  Certain  forms  of  exercise  or  sport  owe  their  fascina- 
tion to  the  fact  that  they  resemble  the  activities  of  primitive  life.  Defective  systemic 
oxidation  is  often  associated  with  certain  mental  symptoms  of  restlessness,  dulness, 
irritability,  and  a  craving  for  excitement.  Physiologically,  the  purpose  of  the  thrill 
is  to  enhance  sj'stemic  oxidation.  Its  psychical  effect  is  a  sense  of  well-being.  Thrills 
are  the  manifestations  of  a  single  vital  force,  but  for  the  sake  of  analysis  are  empirically 
divided  into  four  elements:  positive  and  negative,  pertaining  to  the  sensory  aspect  of 
thrills;  active  and  passive,  pertaining  to  the  motor  aspect.  All  thrills  may  be  looked 
upon  as  being  attempts  at  physiological  adjustment. — Irving  R.  Kaiser,  Pedagogical 
Seminary,  October,  1920.  O.  B.  Y. 

The  Creative  Impulse  in  Industry. — A  change  has  come  over  men's  minds  in  the 
twentieth  century  and  labor  is  no  longer  satisfied  with  a  little  more  comfort,  a  little 
more  wages,  a  little  more  "bread  and  circus."  One  reason  for  this  change  is  that 
modern  industry  more  and  more  cuts  off  the  possibility  for  self-expression.  In  some 
kinds  of  work  the  only  form  of  skill  is  the  attainment  of  an  extremely  high  degree  of 
speed.  The  creative  instinct  in  man  makes  him  take  pleasure  in  the  work  of  his 
own  hands  and  exult  to  see  it  take  shape  and  grow,  but  this  instinct  is  largely  starved 
under  such  conditions.  A  recent  American  writer,  Mr.  R.  Wolf,  holds  that  the  creative 
instinct  in  the  individual  cannot  be  suppressed,  but  can  only  be  deflected  or  perverted 
into  useless  or  destructive  channels.  According  to  a  recent  work  on  biology  there 
have  been  certain  critical  points  in  the  evolution  of  man  when  the  race  was  impelled 
by  instinct  to  choose  (using  the  words  instinct  and  choice  to  symbolize  forces  but  little 
understood)  between  one  line  of  development  or  another.  Thus  the  hand  rather  than 
the  wing,  hoof,  or  fin  was  developed.  Passing  from  the  evolution  of  the  human  body 
to  the  evolution  of  men  in  society,  it  is  possible  that  human  society  is  now  faced  with  a 
similar  alternative  of  developing  capacity  and  function  among  its  members.  The 
faculty  of  creativeness  is  not  confined  to  the  few  who  exercise  directive  functions  but 
"is  common  to  mankind."  .\utocratic  domination  of  the  wills  of  workmen  by  prevent- 
ing free  self-e,\pression  (as  in  some  forms  of  scientific  management)  evokes  destructive 
forces  in  industry. — B.  L.  Hutchins,  Conlemporarv  Review,  February,  192 1. 

O.  B.  Y. 

Liberty  of  Teaching  in  Social  Sciences. — It  is  widely  believed  that  better  civic 
education  requires  the  teaching  of  the  various  social  sciences  in  public  schools  because 
the  "large  group"  social  responsibilities  of  citizens  are  becoming  constantly  more 


RECENT  LITERATURE  797 

complicated  and  momentous  in  all  "federate"  societies.  But  how  should  teachers  of 
sociology  approach  contemporary  problems,  since  contentious  issues  in  the  realm  of  the 
social  sciences  arise  largely  over  interpretations  of  social  values  or  worths?  Only 
seldom  are  questions  of  fact  involved.  Successful  teaching  of  social  values  means  that 
the  teacher  shall  be  an  advocate,  a  pleader,  perhaps  a  partisan.  To  "teach"  various 
social  values  means  inevitably  to  "advocate"  them,  to  seek,  to  shape  appreciations, 
ideals,  sentiments,  attitudes  of  learners  toward  them.  Thus  social-science  teachers 
will  in  the  future  exhibit  three  types,  (i)  the  servile  teachers,  perhaps  a  minority, 
who  have  little  will  and  are  eager  to  teach  whatever  is  approved  by  the  "powers  above"; 
(2)  the  wilful  teachers  who  tend  to  value  their  own  opinions  above  those  of  any,  or 
all,  of  their  fellows,  are  possessed  of  strong  impulse,  and  promote  the  antagonism  of 
conservative  groups  or  those  having  vested  interests  in  a  stable  social  order;  (3) 
the  balanced  teachers  who  come  between  these  two  extremes  and  are  guided  by  the 
evidence  rather  than  by  partisan  contentions  or  their  own  prepossessions.  Guiding 
principles  for  the  two  extreme  types  are  of  little  use,  hence  these  principles  will  be 
considered  from  the  standpoint  of  the  "balanced"  type.  The  social-science  teacher 
should  follow  the  collective  opinions  or  valuations  of  the  society  which  he  serves. 
He  should  distinguish  between  those  conclusions  and  hypotheses  as  to  fact  and  valua- 
tion and  those  tentative  findings  and  speculations.  In  dealing  with  unsettled  issues 
which  divide  men  into  different  camps  he  should  suppress  his  own  partisan  impulses 
and  emotional  preferences.  He  must  conform  to  the  will  of  the  majority  by  practicing 
toleration  and  other  kinds  of  compromise. — David  Snedden,  School  and  Society, 
February,  1921.  C.  N. 

Food  Tastes  and  Food  Prejudices  of  Men  and  Dogs. — Eskimo  dogs  brought  up 
around  ships  and  used  to  eating  many  sorts  of  food  do  not  mind  eating  a  new  food, 
but  dogs  brought  up  on  a  diet  restricted  to  two  or  three  articles,  will,  if  they  are  more 
than  a  year  old,  always  refuse  at  first  when  an  entirely  new  food  is  offered  to  them. 
The  food  prejudices  is  always  stronger  the  older  the  dog.  Of  dogs  of  the  same  age,  the 
female  dog  also  has  much  the  stronger  prejudice  against  the  new  food.  A  similar 
condition  prevails  among  men.  Men  who  are  used  to  a  few  staple  articles  of  food 
are  reluctant  to  try  new  foods,  but  men  used  to  a  variety  in  diet  take  readily  to  a  new 
food.  Similarly  it  was  observed  that  Eskimo  women  were  far  more  reluctant  to 
try  a  new  food  than  the  men.  Such  observations  lead  to  the  conclusions  that  prejudices 
are  due  to  early  habits  and  that  women  are  more  conservative  than  men,  and  that 
conservatism  is  a  fundamental  characteristic  of  the  female  sex  extending  down  into 
the  lower  animals. — Vilhjalmur  Stefansson,  Scientific  Monthly,  December,  1920. 

K.  E.  B. 

The  Measurement  of  Intelligence. — Intelligence  tests  are  not  limited  to  schools 
and  colleges,  but  they  extend  widely  to  commercial  and  industrial  institutions  as  well. 
Many  different  methods  are  used  of  which  the  Binet-Simon  Scale  is  used  mainly  to 
identify  and  grade  feeble-minded  and  backward  children.  While  the  value  of  intelli- 
gence tests  cannot  be  accurately  measured,  they,  however,  purport  to  give  two  facts 
concerning  the  intellects  of  children.  One  is  mental  age  or  the  measure  of  the  level  of 
intelligence  attained.  This  is  the  essential  fact  in  the  accurate  grading  of  children 
in  school.  The  other  fact  is  the  intelligence  quotient,  or  the  index  of  mental  alertness 
or  brightness  which  is  the  basis  for  prediction  of  progress  both  in  school  and  to  some 
extent  out  of  it.  Thus,  the  intelligence  test  is  of  high  value  in  reclassifying  children 
according  to  their  mental  age  and  alertness,  in  selecting  them  and  assigning  them  to  the 
work  for  which  they  are  best  fitted,  and  in  providing  means  of  testing  what  Thorndike 
calls  mechanical  and  social  intelligence  as  well  as  abstract  intelligence. — V.  A.  C. 
Henmon,  School  and  Society,  February,  192 1.  C.  N. 

Expert  Testimony  in  Criminal  Procedure  Involving  the  Question  of  the  Mental 
State  of  the  Defendant. — The  method  of  trial  of  a  criminal  case  before  a  jury  is  in 
the  nature  of  a  combat  in  which  two  opposing  forces  are  lined  up  against  each  other 
and  the  battle  goes  to  the  strongest.  The  judge  is  a  referee  whose  business  it  is  to 
prevent  fouls  and  the  taking  of  unfair  advantages.  Into  this  arena  the  e.xpert  witness 
is  introduced.     He  is  hired  and  paid  by  one  of  the  parties  to  the  issue,  his  direct 


798  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

testimony  is  given  in  response  to  the  attorney  representing  that  party.  The  attorney 
for  the  opposite  side  then  undertakes  to  tear  to  pieces  his  contribution  to  the  evidence. 
It  is  essentially  a  partisan  conflict.  Having  this  psychological  situation  in  mind,  it  is 
remarkable  that  expert  witnesses  have  measured  up  to  the  demands  as  well  as  they 
have.  A  committee  upon  which  the  writer  has  served  has  formulated  statutes  designed 
to  eliminate  these  evils  by  providing  for  the  services  of  disinterested  expert  witnesses 
and  by  providing  that  when  the  existence  of  mental  disease  becomes  an  issue  in  the 
case  the  accused  shall  be  committed  to  a  hospital  for  the  insane  in  order  that  he  may 
be  under  observation.  This  projected  statute  was  unanimously  adopted  by  the 
American  Institute  of  Criminal  Law  and  Criminology.  The  function  of  the  expert 
should  be  to  bring  his  specialized  knowledge  to  the  service  of  the  particular  issue  being 
tried  and  upon  the  witness  stand  to  explain  as  far  in  detail  as  his  examination  permits 
the  mental  state  of  the  defendant. — William  A.  White,  Journal  of  Criminal  Law  and 
Criminology,  February,  1921.  O.  B.  Y. 

The  Essential  Sociological  Equipment  of  Workers  with  Delinquents. — Attempt  is 
made  here  to  sketch  the  minimum  of  social-science  equipment  for  any  judge,  probation 
or  parole  officer,  or  executive  of  an  institution  who  conceives  his  job  seriously  in  the 
scientific  spirit,  (i)  He  should  understand  the  normal  life  of  society,  i.e.,  social 
processes,  the  functions  of  typical  social  institutions  like  the  government,  the  family, 
the  school,  and  religion,  the  dominating  role  of  social  customs  and  mental  relationships, 
in  order  to  get  at  the  conditions  under  which  normal  citizenship  may  be  expected  to 
thrive.  (2)  He  should  have  an  understanding  of  the  institutions  and  forces  which 
might  be  developed  for  social  control.  (3)  He  should  be  able  to  develop  the  sense  of 
social  responsibility  in  the  antisocial  as  already  has  been  done  through  honor  systems 
and  self-government  plans  in  prisons,  jails,  and  reformatories.  (4)  The  worker  with 
delinquents  should  know  enough  economics  to  be  able  to  teach  thrift,  to  manage  an 
institution  with  some  business  acumen.  (5)  Every  probation  or  parole  officer  should 
be  familiar  with  the  leading  literature  in  vocational  guidance  such  as  Brewer's  Voca- 
tional Guidance,  Kelly's  Hiring  the  Worker,  etc.  (6)  He  should  know  the  elements 
of  ordinary  business  economics  which  include  the  fundamental  factors  in  production, 
distribution  and  exchange,  money  and  banking,  the  problems  of  unemployment,  etc. 
Standard  textbooks  on  economics  and  on  labor  problems  would  offer  such  information. 
Other  sociological  information  can  be  obtained  from  such  standard  books  in  sociology 
that  are  available. — Arthur  J.  Todd,  Social  Hygiene,  January,  192 1.  C.  N. 

Nogen  Tanker  om  Arbeidersp3rsmaal. — Industrialism  as  a  form  of  organization 
of  human  labor  is  hardly  a  century  old,  yet  its  rapid  development  is  in  itself  an  indica- 
tion of  its  vitality  and  efficiency.  The  idea  of  industrialism  has  so  obsessed  the  minds 
of  men  that  the  greater  number  believe  this  form  of  productive  organization  to  be  the 
final  phase  of  the  evolution  of  human  labor.  It  has  been  proposed  that  all  society 
should  be  made  one  great  industrial  plant  which  should  absorb  the  functions  of  capital 
and  business,  and  that  all  citizens  should  become  the  paid  servants  of  the  state. 
Nothing  but  dire  necessity  can  ever  force  people  to  cherish  industriahsm  or  state 
socialism  as  ideals.  The  ideal  of  industrialism  is  opposed  to  human  ideals  of  freedom, 
especially  the  ideal  of  giving  men  work  which  they  can  enjoy  because  it  is  interesting. 
In  the  period  of  the  Renaissance  the  work  of  a  large  number  of  independent  artisans 
was  closely  related  to  that  of  the  highest  arts  and  sciences.  Leonardo  da  Vinci, 
Michelangelo,  Velasquez,  Diirer,  and  many  others  of  the  famous  masters  began  their 
career  in  the  workshop.  The  period  of  colonization  of  Africa,  Asia,  and  .America  also 
gave  a  wide  scope  to  initiative  and  enterprise.  Progress  in  the  technique  of  production 
does  not  always  mean  the  loss  of  individual  enterprise.  Twenty  years  ago  100,000 
Norwegian  fishermen  spent  most  of  the  year  at  sea  in  open  rowboats  and  suffered 
untold  hardships  in  return  for  a  meager  livelihood.  By  the  aid  of  public  loans  and 
through  individual  and  co-operative  enterprise  the  fishing  industry  has  been 
modernized  and  before  the  war  Norway  had  a  fishing  fleet  of  more  than  7,000  covered 
motorboats.  The  writer  notes  a  marked  change  in  the  personality  of  the  men  engaged 
in  fishing.  The  development  of  independent  enterprise  is  also  advancing  in  agri- 
culture. In  Denmark  and  Belgium  there  has  been  a  rapid  development  of  the  small- 
farm  system.     Modern  agricultural  science  and  technique  has  made  intensive  cultiva- 


RECENT  LITERATURE  799 

tion  on  a  small  scale  profitable.  The  conclusion  is  that  neither  large-scale  industry 
nor  individual  enterprise  is  necessarily  the  highest  form  of  industrial  development. — 
Johan  Hjort,  Sociale  Meddeldser,  October,  1920.  O.  B.  Y. 

Success  Record  of  Delinquent  Beys  in  Relation  to  Intelligence. — This  study 
furnishes  data  concerning  the  occupational  grouping,  success  record,  and  intelligence 
of  boys  who  had  left  Whittier  State  School  during  a  period  of  two  years.  A  positive 
general  relationship  between  inteUigence  and  success  records  for  the  whole  group  was 
indicated  by  a  coefficient  of  correlation  of  .19.  Considering  the  specific  occupational 
groups,  however,  there  was  a  wide  variation  of  relationship  indicated;  i.e.,  from  a 
positive  correlation  of  .74  in  the  agricultural  group  to  a  negative  correlation  of  —.51 
in  the  case  of  those  engaged  in  transportation.  The  study  suggests  that  a  more 
detailed  classification  of  success  record,  an  objective  method  of  estimating  degree  of 
supervision  afforded,  a  measure  of  vocational  ability,  as  well  as  measurements  of 
intelligence  and  temperament,  must  be  devised  before  we  can  evaluate  the  importance 
of  the  various  factors  which  bear  on  the  probable  success  record.  The  present  study 
indicates  that  intelligence  is  one  of  the  important  factors  and  should  be  considered 
in  social  diagnosis,  with  due  consideration  of  supplementary  factors. — Willis  W. 
Clark.     (Pamphlet.)     Whittier  State  School,  \Vhittier,  Cal.  R.  D.  G. 

The  Juvenile  Delinquent. — The  two  important  facts  of  criminology  are,  first, 
that  the  present  method  of  dealing  with  crime  is  a  failure;  second,  that  the  habitual 
criminal  always  starts  at  an  early  age.  The  failure  of  the  law  to  stay  the  develop- 
ment of  habitual  offenders  is  due  to  attempting  to  treat  crime  by  a  prearranged  vindic- 
tive plan  without  any  consideration  of  the  cause  or  the  individual.  Crime  is  a  form 
of  conduct;  the  organ  of  conduct  is  the  mind.  How  can  it  be  possible  to  deal  properly 
with  a  prisoner  without  studying  his  mind  ?  Mental  defect  is  pre-eminently  the  cause 
of  crime.  Juvenile  delinquents  may  be  divided  into  two  groups,  general  and  special. 
In  the  general  group  we  may  put  those  whose  bad  conduct  can  be  explained  on  well- 
recognized  lines,  e.g.,  some  physical  defect  or  illness,  a  bad  home,  the  wrong  occupa- 
tion, or  lack  of  training  for  any  occupation  at  all.  In  the  special  group  we  put  those 
for  whom  some  form  of  mental  analysis  is  necessary  to  detect  the  fimdamental  causes. 
For  those  who  have  graduated  in  misconduct,  how  can  a  few  weeks  of  imprisonment, 
even  if  assisted  by  training,  be  sufficient  to  change  the  habits  and  wrong  trends  of 
thought  that  have  existed  for  years.  Lightning  cures  are  scarcely  ever  possible. 
Reform  usually  means  much  hard  work,  both  on  the  part  of  the  offender  and  those  in 
charge  of  him.  Often  the  whole  conditions  must  be  changed  to  prevent  persisting 
bad  influence.  Such  influence  may  come  from  the  present  reputation,  old  associates, 
and  even  from  the  family  attitude.  For  the  prevention  of  juvenile  dehnquency 
social  reform  is  one  of  the  most  important  steps.  The  child  must  have  opportunities 
to  play  and  develop.  A  pubUc  park  in  every  district  is  essential,  but  there  must  be 
supervision  and  organization. — W.  A.  Potts,  School  Hygiene,  November,  1920. 

K.  E.  B. 

The  Criminologist  and  the  Courts. — Personality  is  the  most  diverse  of  the 
individual  phenomena  which  must  be  dealt  with  in  mental  science.  But  all  items  in 
a  personality  analysis  are  not  of  equal  value  and  it  is  therefore  possible  to  make  some 
classifications  and  groupings.  The  egocentric  or  paranoid-personality  type  includes  a 
great  diversity  of  quahties,  the  common  characteristic  being  the  e.xaggeratedly  ego- 
centric reaction.  This  classification  is  not  based  upon  any  physical  or  structural 
quality  but  is  based  entirely  upon  an  analysis  of  behavior.  On  account  of  their 
resemblance  to  a  group  of  mental  diseases  known  as  paranoia,  the  name  of  paranoid 
personality  has  been  applied  to  this  type.  They  are  not  to  be  considered  feeble- 
minded, insane,  or  mentally  below  par  in  the  ordinarily  accepted  sense  of  that  term. 
They  are  frequently  endowed  with  average  or  even  superior  intelligence.  Their 
success  in  plying  their  criminal  trade  often  depends  upon  their  ability  to  outwit 
honest  citizens.  In  the  Juvenile  Court  of  Chicago  practically  all  cases  which  fail  on 
probation  belong  to  this  type.  The  defective  delinquent  is  a  mentally  defective  indi- 
vidual who  conducts  himself  in  some  unusually  offensive  manner.  The  psychopathic 
criminal  is  an  individual  in  which  there  exists  a  definite  and  positive  trend  toward 


8oo  THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 

some  form  of  antisocial  behavior.  Under  our  present  system  of  administering  justice 
he  is  usuallj'  pronounced  insane  by  the  court  and  committed  to  a  hospital  for  the 
insane.  So  long  as  criminal  law  determines  these  cases  on  the  basis  of  responsibility 
and  on  the  basis  of  property  damage  there  will  be  difficulty  in  treating  them  adequately. 
The  following  recommendations  are  made:  (i)  Criminals  and  delinquents  should  not 
be  committed  to  definite  institutions,  but  to  the  guardianship  of  the  state,  to  be  under 
scientific  direction  of  trained  criminologists.  (2)  The  treatment  applied  to  the 
prisoners  should  be  based  upon  their  individual  needs  and  the  duration  of  the  treat- 
ment depends  upon  their  progress  toward  normalcy  rather  than  upon  their  promises 
or  upon  their  ability  to  conform  to  the  discipline  of  any  particular  institution.  Under 
a  properly  administered  department  of  state  guardianship  it  would  be  possible  to 
transfer  the  wards  of  the  state  from  one  institution  or  occupation  to  another  according 
to  the  need  of  each  individual  case.  (3)  The  criminal,  the  insane,  and  the  dependent 
should  be  legally  declared  minors  until  such  time  as  they  show  that  they  have  reached 
a  state  of  maturity  equivalent  to  adult  age  and  are  capable  of  managing  their  own 
affairs. — Herman  M.  Adler,  Journal  of  Criminal  Law  and  Criminology,  November, 
1920.  O.  B.  Y. 

Early  Anticipation  of  Prison  Reform. — Recent  years  have  brought  prison  reform 
into  general  view  by  such  prison  wardens  as  Thomas  Mott  Osborne,  Tynan,  and 
Homer.  The  Quakers  of  Pennsylvania  had  already  undertaken  the  initial  effort 
between  1776  and  1790.  They  had  as  a  guide  and  inspiration  the  splendid  tradition 
of  William  Penn  who  believed  in  the  penological  principle  that  in  each  coimty  there 
should  be  a  workhouse,  and  that  hard  labor  should  supersede  idleness,  while  corporal 
punishments  should  take  the  place  of  capital  punishments.  In  1793,  when  yellow 
fever  came  to  Philadelphia,  prisoner  volunteers  were  employed  at  the  Bush  Hill 
Hospital.  Some  sort  of  a  modified  self-government  system  was  developed  by  the 
convicts.  But  it  was  in  the  period  from  1828  to  1833  that  at  the  Boston  Juvenile 
House  of  Reformation,  a  most  surprising  development  of  self-government  occurred. 
Wells  inaugurated  a  government  by  the  children  and  placed  responsibility  for  advance- 
ment or  punishment  upon  the  children  themselves.  It  was  a  government  by  per- 
sonality. This  very  prominence  of  personality  as  the  controlling  factor  in  administra- 
tion has  been  the  leading  feature  of  the  prison  history  of  the  nineteenth  century  in 
America.  Today  American  prisons  seek  social  and  industrial  reformation  and  in 
prisons  training  for  life  is  done  through  action  and  not  through  suppression  of  action. — 
0.  F.  Lewis,  The  Unpartizan  Review,  January  and  March,  1921.  C.  N. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY 

BOOKS 

Balfour,  Arthur  J.     Essays  Speculative  Beer,  M.     A  History  of  British  Socialism, 

and    PoHtical.     New    York:     Doran.  Vol.  II.     New  York:    Harcourt.     Pp. 

Pp.  X+241.     $3.00.  xi+410. 

Barnett,  Avron.     Foundations  of  Femi-  Berkeley.     Les    Principes    de     la     con- 

nism.   New  York:   McBride.     Pp.254.  naissance     humaine.     Traduction     de 

$2.50.  Charles    Renouvier.     103,    Boulevard 

Barr,  M.  W.,  and  Maloney,  E.  F.     Types  Saint.    Michel,    Paris:     Librairie    Ar- 

of   Mental   Defectives.     Philadelphia:  mand  Colin.     Pp.  .\ii-l-105. 

Blakiston.     Pp.  vii-l-174.  Bernhardi,    Friedrich    A.    J.    von.     The 

Baudouin,  Charles.  Suggestion  and  War  of  the  Future  in  the  Light  of  the 
Autosuggestion.  A  psychological  and  Lessons  of  the  World  War.  Trans- 
pedagogical  study  based  upon  the  lated  by  F.  Holt.  New  York:  Apple- 
investigations  made  by  the  new  Fancy  ton.  Pp.  xix-(-3io.  $3.50. 
School.  From  the  French  by  Eden  Bing,  Alexander  M.  War-Time  Strikes 
and  Cedar  Paul.  New  York:  Dodd,  and  Their  Adjustment.  New  York: 
Mead.     Pp.249.     $300.  Dutton.     Pp.  ix-+-329.     $2.50. 


RECENT  LITERATURE 


8oi 


Bonright,  James  C.  .  Railroad  Capitali- 
zation. Study  of  principles  of  regula- 
tion of  railroad  securities.  New  York: 
Longmans.     Pp.  201. 

Boyd,  Jackson.  The  Human  Situation 
in  Nature.  Chicago:  Chas.  H.  Kerr 
and  Co.     Pp.  278. 

Brett,  Oliver.  A  Defence  of  Liberty. 
New  York:    Putman.    Pp.251.  $3.50. 

Bro\vn,  Robert  N.  R.  The  Principles  of 
Economic  Geography.  New  York: 
Pitman.     Pp.  xv-f2o8.     $4.00. 

Burchardt,  C.  B.  Norwegian  Life  and 
Literature.  New  York:  Oxford  Univ. 
Press.     Pp.  viii-l-230.     $5.25. 

Burnham,  A.  C.  Community  Health 
Problems.  New  York:  Macmillan. 
Pp.  159.  $1 .60. 

Cabot,  E.  L.  Seven  Ages  of  Childhood. 
Boston:  Houghton.     Pp.321.     $3.75. 

Cabot,  William  B.  Labrador.  Boston: 
Small,  ^laynard.  Pp.  xiii-f-354.  $3.00. 

Cadman,  S.  P.,  and  Others.  Problem  of 
Christian  Unity.  New  York:  Mac- 
millan.    Pp.127.     Si-75- 

Cardinal],  A.  W.  Natives  of  the  North- 
em  Territories  of  the  Gold  Coast: 
Their  Customs,  Religion,  and  Folklore. 
Routledge.     Pp.  158.     12s.  6d. 

Carroll,  Robert  S.  Old  at  Forty  or 
Young  at  Sixty.  New  York:  Mac- 
millan.    Pp.  147.     $2.25. 

Cherrington,  E.  H.  Evolution  of  Pro- 
hibition in  the  United  States  of 
America.  Westerville,  Ohio:  Ameri- 
can Issue  Press.     Pp.  384. 

Chesterton,  G.  K.  The  New  Jerusalem. 
New  York:  Doran.    Pp.  x+307.  $3  .00. 

Cole,  G.  D.H.  Guild  Socialism:  A  Plan 
for  Economic  Democracy.  New  York: 
Stokes.     Pp.202.    $1.60. 

Community  Service,  Inc.  Rural  and 
Small  Community  Recreation.  New 
York:    The  Service.     Pp.  139. 

Cruikshank,  Alfred  B.  Popular  Mis- 
government  in  the  United  States. 
New  York:    Moffat,  Yard.     Pp.  455. 

Dealey,  J.  Q.  The  State  and  Govern- 
ment. New  York:  Appleton.  Pp. 
vi -1-409.     S3. 00. 

Dewey,  Evelyn,  Ruml,  Beardsley,  and 
Child,  Emily.  Methods  and  Results 
of  Testing  School  Children.  Manual 
of  Tests  used  by  the  Psychological  Sur- 
vey in  the  pubUc  schools  of  New  York 
City.  Includes  social  and  physical 
studies  of  children  tested.  New  York: 
Dutton.     Pp.  xii+176. 

Dickinson,  G.  Lowes.  Causes  of  Inter- 
national War.  New  York:  Harcourt. 
Pp.  103.     Si  .00. 


District  of  Columbia.  Court  of  Appeals. 
District  of  Columbia  Minimum  Wage 
Cases  No.  3438  and  No.  3467.  Wash- 
ington: The  Court.     Pp.  453. 

Douglas,  C.  H.  Credit-Power  and  De- 
mocracy, with  a  Draft  Scheme  for  the 
Mining  Industry.  London:  Palmer. 
Pp.  212.     75.  6d. 

Dowd,  Jerome.  Democracy  in  America. 
Oklahoma  City:  Harlow  Pub.  Co. 
Pp.  xiii4-5o6. 

Dubnow,  Semen  M.  History  of  the  Jews 
in  Russia  and  Poland  from  the  Earliest 
Times  to  the  Present  Day.  From  the 
Russian  by  L.  Friedlander.  Phila- 
delphia: Jewish  Pub.  Society  of 
America.     Pp.411.     $2.50. 

Dunn,  A.  W.  Community  Civics  and 
Rural  Life.  Boston:  Heath.  Pp.597. 
$1.48. 

Eaves,  Lucile.  Training  for  Store  Serv- 
ice. Vocational  experiences  and  train- 
ing of  juvenile  employees  of  retail 
department,  dry  goods  and  clothing 
stores  in  Boston.  Report  of  investi- 
gations of  Women's  Educational  and 
Industrial  Union.  Boston:  Badger. 
Pp.  149.     $2.00. 

Felton,  Ralph  A.  Serving  the  Neighbor- 
hood. New  York:  Interchurch  Press. 
Pp.  135.     $0.50. 

Follett,  Mary  P.  The  New  State. 
Group  organization  the  solution  of 
popular  government.  New  York :  Long- 
mans.   Pp.  xxix+373.    $3.50. 

Gallichan,  Walter  M.  Sex  Education. 
Textbook  for  parents  and  teachers. 
Boston:  Small,  Maynard.  Pp.  204. 
$2 .00. 

Galloway,  T.  W.  The  Sex  Factor  in 
Human  Life.  A  study  outline  for 
college  men.  New  York:  American 
Social  Hygiene  Association.     Pp.  139. 

Gardiner,  Alfred  G.  The  Anglo- 
American  Future.  New  York:  Oxford 
Univ.  Press.     Pp.64.     $1.00. 

Gooch,  G.  P.  NationaHsm.  New  York: 
Harcourt.     Pp.122.     Si. 00. 

Graham,  Stephen.  Children  of  Slaves. 
New  York:    Macmillan.  Pp.315.    125. 

Great  Britain.  Departmental  Commit- 
tee on  the  Employment  of  Women  and 
Young  Persons  on  the  Two-Shift 
System.  London:  H.  M.  Stationery 
Office.     Pp.  196.     25.  6d. 

Greenwood,  Josephine  H.  Our  Heritage 
from  the  Old  World.  New  York: 
Appleton.     Pp.  xi-(-449.     $2.00. 

Guerard,  .-Mbert  L.  French  Cvilization. 
From  its  origins  to  the  close  of  the 


802 


TEE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 


Middle  Ages.  Boston:  Houghton. 
Pp.328.     $5.00. 

Haley,  Theresa  S.  Infant  Mortality. 
Field  study  in  Akron,  Ohio.  Based 
on  births  in  one  year.  Washington: 
U.S.  Children's  Bureau.     Pp.  114. 

Hammond,  John  H.,  and  Jenks,  Jeremiah. 
Great  American  Issues.  A  construc- 
tive study.  New  York:  Scribner. 
Pp.  xi-l-274.     $2.00. 

Hammond,  John  L.  L.,  and  Hammond, 
Barbara  B.  The  Town  Laborer, 
1 760-1832.  New  York:  Longmans. 
Pp.342.     $2.25. 

Hamsum,  Knut.  The  Growth  of  the 
Soil.  Trans,  from  the  Norwegian  by 
W.  W.  Worster.  New  York:  Knopf. 
2  vols.     Pp.  304,  276.     $5.00. 

Hartley,  C.  G.  Sex  Education  and 
National  Health.  London:  Parsons. 
Pp.  152.     6^. 

Haviland,  Mary  S.  Character  Training 
in  Childhood.  Boston:  Small,  May- 
nard.     Pp.  293. 

Hermberg,  Paul.  Der  Kampf  und  den 
Weltmarkt.  Handelsstatistisches  Ma- 
terial. Jena:  Gustav  Fischer.  Pp. 
xii+135.     M.  25. 

Hertz,  J.  H.  A  Book  of  Jewish  Thoughts. 
Selected  and  arranged  by  the  Chief 
Rabbi.  New  York:  Oxford  Univ. 
Press.     Pp.  xvi-f 368.     $6.25. 

Hewitt,  Richard  G.,  and  Ellis,  Lewis. 
School  Camps.  Their  value  and  or- 
ganization. New  York:  Oxford  Univ. 
Press.     Pp.  no.     $1 .60. 

Hollander,  Bernard.  In  Search  of  the 
Soul  and  the  Mechanism  of  Thought, 
Emotion  and  Conduct.  New  York: 
Button.     Pp.  X+516.     $20.00. 

Huber,  J.  B.  Why  Die  so  Young? 
New  York:  Harper.     Pp.313.     $2.00. 

Interchurch  World  Movement  of  North 
America.  Report  on  the  church  plants 
of  a  typical  city,  showing  the  use  of  the 
Interchurch  World  Movement  score 
card  and  standards  for  rating  city 
church  plants.  New  York :  The  Move- 
ment.    Pp.  213.     $2.50. 

Ireland,  Alleyne.  Democracy  and  the 
Human  Equation.  New  York:  Dut- 
ton.     Pp.  x-f  251.     $3.00. 

Irwin,  Inez  H.  The  Story  of  the 
Woman's  Party.  New  York:  Har- 
court.     Pp.  486.     $3 ,  50. 

Iwasaki,  Uichi.  The  Working  Forces  in 
Japanese  Politics.  Brief  account  of 
political  conflicts,  1867-1920.  New 
York:  Longmans.     Pp.  136. 


Jusserand,  Jean  A.  A.  J.  English  Way- 
faring Life  in  the  Middle  Ages. 
Foureenth  Century.  From  the  French 
by  Lucy  T.  Smith.  New  York:  Put- 
nam.    Pp.  464.     $7 .  50. 

Kansas  Court  of  Industrial  Relations. 
Topeka:   The  Court.     Pp.  14. 

Kawabe,  Kisaburo.  The  Press  and 
Politics  in  Japan.  Chicago:  Univ.  of 
Chicago  Press.     Pp.  xiii+178.     $2.00. 

Kidd,  Benjamin.  Social  Evolution. 
Rev.  Ed.  New  York:  Putnam.  Pp. 
Pp.  ix+404.     $2.50. 

Lennox,  W.  G.  The  Health  of  Mission- 
ary Families  in  China.  A  Statistical 
Study.  Denver:  Univ.  of  Denver. 
Pp.  121. 

Levy,  Paul  E.  The  Rational  Education 
of  the  Will.  Its  Therapeutic  Value. 
Translated  from  the  the  ninth  edition 
by  Florence  K.  Bright.  Philadelphia: 
McKay.     Pp.  x\'i+24i.     $2.00. 

Loosmore,  W.  C.  Nerves  and  the  Man. 
A  popular,  psychological  and  construc- 
tive study  of  nervous  break-down. 
New  York:   Doran.     Pp.223.     $2.50. 

Marchant,  James.  Control  of  Parent- 
Hood.  New  York:  Putnam.  Pp.  222. 
$2 . 50. 

Martm,  Charles  E.  The  Policy  of  the 
United  States  as  Regards  Interven- 
tion. New  York:  Longmans.  Pp. 
166. 

Marvin,  Francis  S.,  Ed.  Recent  De- 
velopments in  European  Thought. 
New  York:  Oxford  Univ.  Press.  Pp. 
306.     $3.00. 

Merejkovski,  Dmitri  S.  The  Menace  of 
the  Mob.  From  the  Russian  by 
Bernard  G.  Guerney.  New  York: 
N.  L.  Brown.     Pp.  155.     $1.50. 

Milnes,  Nora.  Child  Welfare  from  the 
Social  Point  of  View.  A  study  of 
child  welfare  problems  in  England. 
New  York:  Dutton.     Pp.243.     $2.50. 

Miner,  Clarence  E.  Ratification  of  the 
Federal  Constitution  by  the  State  of 
New  York.  New  York:  Longmans. 
Pp.  128. 

Moulton,  H.  G.  Financial  Organization 
of  Society.  Chicago:  Univ.  of  Chicago 
Press.     Pp.  789.     $4.00. 

Myers,  Charles  S.  Mind  and  Work. 
Psychological  Factors  in  Industry  and 
Commerce.    New  York:  Putnam.    Pp. 

xi_-|-i75-     $i-7S- 
National    Research    Council.     National 
Intelligence  Tests.     Directions  for  use 
with  Scale  A,  Form   i,  and  Scale  B, 
Form     I,     prepared     by     Thorndike, 


RECENT  LITERATURE 


803 


Whipple,  Yerkes,  and  others.  New 
York:  World  Bk.  Co.     Pp.32.     $1.60. 

Park,  R.  E.,  and  Miller,  H.  A.  Old 
World  Traits  Transplanted.  New 
York:    Harper.     Pp.   308.     $2.50. 

Pertusi,  Luigi.  Delia  Guerra  -E  Delia 
Pace.  Torino-Genova:  S.  Lattes  and 
C.     Pp.  .xi+295. 

Pierce,  A.  E.  Comparative  Catalog  of 
Literature  for  Adv-isors  of  Young 
Women  and  Girls.  New  York:  Wil- 
son.    Pp.  85.     $1 .00. 

Pollard,  Samuel.  In  Unknown  China. 
Philadelphia:  Lippincott.  Various 
paging.     $5.00. 

Postgate,  R.  W.  The  Workers'  Inter- 
national. New  York:  Harcourt.  Pp. 
107.     $1.00. 

Rees,  J.  F.  A  Social  and  Industrial 
History  of  England,  1815-1918.  New 
York:  Dutton.    Pp.  viii+197.    $2.00. 

Robbins,  Hayes.  Making  of  Tomorrow: 
The  Art  of  Industrial  Right  Living. 
New  York:  Dutton.     Pp.176.     $2.00. 

Roberts,  Peter.  Problem  of  Americani- 
zation. New  York:  Macmillan.  Pp. 
246.     $1.60. 

Savory,  Arthur  H.  Grain  and  Chaff 
from  an  English  Manor.  A  village 
chronicle  of  rural  England.  Boston: 
Houghton.     Pp.  \aii+3ii-     $4  00- 

Sa.vville,  Marshall  H.  The  Goldsmith's 
Art  in  Ancient  Mexico.  New  York: 
Museum  of  American  Indian,  Heye 
Foundation.     Pp.  264. 

Scott,  John  W.  Karl  Marx  on  Value. 
New  York:  Macmillan.    Pp.54.   $1.40. 

Sehgman,  E.  R.  A.,  and  Nearing,  Scott. 
Debate:  That  Capitalism  Has  More 
to  Offer  to  the  Workers  of  the  United 
States  Than  Has  Socialism.  New 
York:  Fine  Arts  Guild,  Inc.  Pp.  46. 
$1.10. 

Smith,  H.  Maynard,  Ed.  The  Early  Life 
and  Education  of  John  Evelyn.  New 
York:  Oxford  Univ.  Press.  Pp. 
XX-I-182.     $5.65. 


Smith,  Preserved.  The  Age  of  the 
Reformation.     New  York:  Holt.    Pp. 

xii+861.     $5,00. 

Smith,  William  Hawley.  Children  by 
Chance  or  by  Choice  and  Some 
Correlated  Considerations.  Boston: 
Badger.     Pp.  351.     $4.00. 

Snedden,  Davis  S.  Sociological  De- 
termination of  Objectives  in  Educa- 
tion. New  York:  Lippincott.  Pp. 
322.     $2.50. 

Stocks,  J.  L.  Patriotism  and  the  Super- 
State.  New  York:  Harcourt.  Pp. 
94.     $1.00. 

Thompson,  Wallace.  The  People  of 
Mexico.  Who  They  are  and  How 
They  Live.  New  York:  Harper. 
Pp.  xi-f427.     $2.50. 

Uppvall,  Axel  Johan.  August  Strindberg. 
A  psychoanalytic  study  with  special 
reference  to  the  Oedipus  complex. 
Boston:    Badger.     Pp.93.    $2.50. 

Wells,  H.  G.  Russia  in  the  Shadows. 
New  York:  Doran.  Pp.  viii-j-i79. 
$1.50. 

Wera,  Eugene.  Human  Engineering. 
Management  of  Human  Forces  in  In- 
dustry.    New   York:    Appleton.     Pp. 

xx+375-     $3-50- 

Whitney,  Jessamine  S.  Infant  Mor- 
tality. Field  Study  in  New  Bedford, 
Mass.  Based  on  the  births  in  one 
year.  Washington:  U.S.  Children's 
Bureau.     Pp.  105. 

Woolf,  Leonard.  Economic  Imperialism. 
New  York:  Harcourt.  Pp.  102. 
$1.00. 

Worms,  Rene.  Philosophic  des  sciences 
sociales.  Seconde  Edition,  Revue. 
Paris:  Marcel  Giard  et  Cie.  Pp.  296. 
10  fr. 

Yarros,  V.  Our  Revolution.  Essays 
in  Interpretation.  Boston:  Badger. 
Pp.  246.     $2.50. 

Zangwill,  Israel.  The  Voice  of  Jerusa- 
lem. New  York:  Macmillan.  Pp. 
368.     $3.00. 


PAMPHLETS 


American  Jewish  Commission.  "Pro- 
tocols," Bolshevism  and  the  Jews. 
New  York:  The  Commission.  Pp. 
16. 

Berkeley.  La  Siris.  Traduction  Fran- 
faise  par  Georges  Beaulavon  e  Domi- 
nique Parodi.  Paris:  LibrairieArmand 
Colin.     Pp.  viii+153. 

Brown,  M.  A.  Study  of  Malnutrition  of 
School-Children.  Kansas  City:  The 
Author.     Pp.  18. 


California  Industrial  Accident  Commis- 
sion. Mine  Safety  Orders,  Effective 
January  i,  192 1.  San  Francisco: 
The  Commission.     Pp.  125. 

Carty,  John.  Science  and  the  Industries. 
Washington:  National  Research  Coim- 
cil.     Pp.  26.     $0.25. 

Christian,  F.  L.  Characteristics  of  the 
Population  of  the  Elmira  Reformatory. 
Elmira:  New  York  State  Reformatory. 
Pp.  II. 


8o4 


THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 


Christian,  F.  L.  How  We  Obtain  De- 
tailed Information  Concerning  Our 
Inmates  and  Their  Environment. 
Ebnira:  New  York  State  Reformatory. 
Pp.  22. 
.  Management  of  Penal  Institu- 
tions. Elmira:  New  York  State 
Reformatory.     Pp.  i6. 

.    The  Irresponsible  Social  Offender. 

Elmira:  New  York  State  Reformatory. 
Pp.  26. 
City  Commission  on  Employment.     How 
to     Meet     Unemployment.     Buffalo: 
The  Commission.     Pp.  4. 
Colorado  Board  of  Health.   Revised  Regu- 
lations.   Denver:  The  Board.     Pp.47. 
Colorado  Teachers  College.     Educational 
Tests    and    Measurements.      Greeley: 
The  College.     Pp.  66. 
Conkhn,    E.    S.     Foster-Child    Fantasy. 
Eugene:  University  of  Oregon.  Pp.20. 
Cooley,  Edwin  J.     Tendencies  and  De- 
velopments in  the  Field  of  Probation. 
New  York:   National  Probation  Asso- 
ciation.    Pp.  27. 
Creel,     George.      Police     Commissioner 
Richard   E.    Enright   RepUes    to   His 
Critics:    No  "Crime  Wave"  in  New 
York  City.     New  York:    Police  De- 
partment.    Pp.  8. 
Darrow,    Clarence.     Argument    in    the 
Case  of  the  Communist  Labor  Party 
in  the  Criminal  Court,  Chicago.     Chi- 
cago:  Chas.  H.  Kerr  and  Co.    Pp.  113. 
Davis,  Jackson.     Building  a  Rural  Civi- 
lization.    61    Broadway,     New   York: 
General  Education  Board.     Pp.  17. 
Diemer,    Hugo.     Factory    Organization 
and  Administration.     New  York:  Mc- 
Graw-Hill.    Pp.  389.     $4.00. 
Ditchett,     S.     H.     Historic     Costumes. 
Their  Influence  on  Modern  Fashions. 
New  York:  The  Dry  Goods  Economist. 
Pp.  20.     $0.50. 
Dole,  C.  F.     Religion  for  the  New  Day. 
New   York:    Huebsch.     Pp.    xi-t-297. 
$2.00. 
Douglas,    D.    W.     American    Minimum 
Wage    Laws    at    Work.     New    York: 
National  Consumers'  League.     Pp.  41. 
$0. 10. 
Fernald,   Walter   E.    After-Care   Study 
of     the     Patients     Discharged     from 
Waverly  for  a  Period  of  Twenty-five 
Years.     Boston:      Massachusetts    So- 
ciety for  Mental  Hygiene.     Pp.  8. 
Frear,  J.  A.     Phillippine  Independence. 

Apply  to  Congressmen.     Pp.  20. 
Galliver,  G.  A.     Industrial  Co-operation: 
a  New  Renaissance.     Holyoke,  Mass.: 
American  Writing  Paper  Co.     Pp.  19. 


Gardiner,  A.  G.  Anglo-American  Future. 
New  York:  O.xford  Univ.  Press.  Pp. 
64.     2s.  6d. 

Great  Britain.  Local  Government 
Board.  Maternity  and  Child  Welfare. 
London:  H.  M.  Stationery  Office. 
Pp.  16.     2d. 

Hampton  Institute.  Fifty-Second  An- 
nual Report  of  the  Principal,  1920. 
Hampton,  Va.:  Hampton  Press.  Pp.32. 

Harding,  J.  R.  One  Thousand  Reforma- 
tory Prisoners  as  Seen  in  Perspective. 
Elmira:  New  York  State  Reforma- 
tory.    Pp.  12. 

Hart,  H.  H.  Comparing  American 
Prison  Association  Semicentennial, 
1870-1920.  135  E.  15th  St.,  New 
York:  O.  F.  Lewis,  General  Secre- 
tary.    Pp.  47. 

Hoffman,  F.  L.  National  Health  Insur- 
ance and  the  Medical  Profession. 
Newark,  N.J.:  Prudential  Life  Insur- 
ance Co.     Pp.  122. 

Hotchkiss,  George  B.,  and  Franken, 
Richard.  The  Attention  Value  of 
Advertisements  in  a  Leading  Periodi- 
cal. 90  Trinity  Place,  New  York: 
L.  H.  Haney.     Pp.32.     $0.50. 

Independent  Labor  Party  Information 
Committee,  comp.  Trade  Unions  in 
Soviet  Russia.  Collection  of  Russian 
trade  union  documents.  New  York: 
Rand  School  of  Social  Science.  Pp.  9  r . 
$0. 50. 

Interchurch  World  Movement  of  North 
America.  Susquehanna  County  Sur- 
vey. New  York:  Interchurch  Press. 
Pp.52.     $0.50. 

Kroeber,  A.  L.  Three  Essays  on  the 
Antiquity  and  Races  of  Man.  Berke- 
ley, Cal.:  Univ.  of  California  Press. 
Pp.  75- 

Labour  Party.  Appeal  to  the  British 
Nation  by  the  Labour  Party:  An 
Indictment  of  the  CoaUtion  Govern- 
ment Together  with  the  Labour 
Party's  Alternative.  London:  The 
Party.     Pp.  8. 

Lockitt,  Charles  H.  The  Relations  of 
French  and  English  Society,  1 763-1 793. 
New  York:  Longmans.  Pp.  x-)-i35. 
$2.50. 

Maine  De  Biran.  MC^moire  sur  les 
perceptions  obscures  suivi  de  la  dis- 
cussion avec  Royer-CoUard  sur  I'e.xis- 
tenced'un^tatpurementaffectif.  Paris: 
Librairie  Armand  Colin.    Pp.  ix-f-66. 

Milnes,  Nora.  Child  Welfare  from  the 
Social  Point  of  View.  London:  Dent. 
Pp.  243.     bs. 


RECENT  LITERATURE 


805 


Murray,  Flora.  Women  as  Army  Sur- 
geons. London:  Hodder.  Pp.  263. 
125.  6d. 

National  Child  Welfare  Association. 
Child  Welfare  Hand  Book.  New 
York:  The  Association.  Pp.  47. 
$0.50. 

New  York  Community  Service.  Winter 
Sports  in  New  York.  Places  and  per- 
mits for  all  forms  of  indoor  and  out- 
door winter  recreation.  New  York: 
The  Service.     Pp.  18. 

New  York  State  Reformator>\  Reasons 
for  the  Commitment  of  Misdemean- 
ants as  well  as  Felons  to  Reforma- 
tories. Elmira:  The  Reformatory. 
Pp.  7. 

Parsons,  P.  A.  Survey  of  the  Port  of 
Portland  Conducted  by  the  Portland 
School  of  Social  Work  of  the  Univer- 
sity of  Oregon.  Eugene:  Extension 
Division,  University  of  Oregon.  Pp. 
19. 

PhiUips,  H.  D.  Cooperative  Marketmg 
in  the  Chautauqua-Erie  Grape  Indus- 
try. Ithaca:  Cornell  University.  Pp. 
94. 

Pierce,  Anna  E.,  comp.  Catalog  of 
Literature  for  Advisers  of  Young 
Women  and  Girls.  New  York:  Wil- 
son.    Pp.  85.     $1 .00. 

Randall,  J.  H.  New  Vision  of  Life  as 
Organized  for  Ser\-ice.  New  York: 
Community  Church.     Pp.24.     $0.10. 

Rockford  Public  Schools.  Course  of 
Study  in  Community  Life.  Rockford, 
111.     New  Illinois  Stationery  Co. 

South  Carolina  State  Board  of  Public 
Welfare.  First  Annual  Report,  1920. 
Columbia,  S.C:  The  Board.     Pp.174. 

Spilman,  Bernard  W.  A  Study  in  Reli- 
gious Pedagogy.  New  York:  Revell. 
Pp.88.     So.  75. 

Tolsted,  E.  B.  Pensions  for  Industrial 
Employees.  Philadelphia:  Indepen- 
dence Bureau.     Pp.  4. 

U.S.  Bureau  of  Education.  Joy  and 
Health  Through  Play.  Washington: 
Govt.  Ptg.  Office.     Pp.  19. 

U.S.  Bureau  of  Labor  Statistics.  Stand- 
ardization of  Industrial  Accident 
Statistics.  Washington:  Govt.  Ptg. 
Office.     Pp.  103. 

U.S.  Bureau  of  Mines.  Value  of  Oxygen 
Breathing  Apparatus  in  Mine  Rescue 
Operations.  Washington:  Govt.  Ptg. 
Office.     Pp.  3. 

.     Ventilation     in     Metal     Mines. 

Washington :  Govt.  Ptg.  Office.    Pp.  44. 


U.S.  Children's  Bureau.  Infant  Mor- 
tahty:  Results  of  a  Field  Study  in 
.\kron,  Ohio.  Washington:  Govt. Ptg. 
Office.     Pp.  118. 

.     Infant   Mortality:    Results  of  a 

Field  Study  in  New  Bedford,  Massa- 
chusetts. Washington:  Govt.  Ptg. 
Office.     Pp.  114. 

U.S.  Department  of  Labor.  Report  of 
Special  Committee  Appointed  by  the 
Secretary  of  Labor  to  Investigate 
Complaints  against  the  Temporary 
Admission  of  Aliens  for  Agricultural 
Purposes.  Washington:  Govt.  Ptg. 
Office.     Pp.  II. 

U.S.  Employees'  Compensation  Com- 
mission. Hospitals  and  Physicians 
Available.  Washington:  Govt.  Ptg. 
Office.     Pp.  91. 

U.S.  House  Committee  on  Foreign 
Affairs.  Relief  for  Suffering  Popula- 
tions of  the  World.  Apply  to  Con- 
gressmen.    Pp.  39. 

U.S.  House  Committee  on  Interstate 
and  Foreign  Commerce.  Protection 
of  Maternity  and  Infancy.  Apply  to 
Congressmen.     Pp.  6. 

U.S.  Public  Health  Service.  Healthy 
and  Happy  W'omanhood.  Washing- 
ton:  Govt.  Ptg.  Office.     Pp.  16. 

.  Square  Deal  for  the  Boy  in  Indus- 
try. Washington:  Govt.  Ptg.  Office. 
Pp.  II. 

U.S.  Women's  Bureau.  New  Position 
of  Women  in  American  Industry. 
Washington:  Govt.  Ptg.  Office.  Pp. 
158. 

.     Preliminary  Report  of  a  Survey 

of  Wages,  Hours  and  Conditions  of 
Work  of  the  Women  in  Industry  in 
Atlanta,  Georgia.  Washington:  Govt. 
Ptg.  Office.     Pp.  31. 

Veiller,  Lawrence.  The  Housing  Situ- 
ation and  the  Way  Out.  New  York: 
National  Housing  Association.  Pp.  4. 
$0.25. 

Weaver,  E.  W.  Distribution  of  Labor 
Recruits  New  York:  United  Y.M.C.A. 
Schools.     Pp.  23. 

Webb,  Sidney.  Root  of  Labor  Unrest. 
London:  Fabian  Society.     Pp.  iS-     2d. 

Y.M.C.A.  of  Chicago.  Annual  Review 
Number  of  the  Official  Bulletin. 
Chicago:  The  Y.M.C.A.     Pp.  72. 

Young  Women's  Christian  Association. 
Executive  and  Technical  Women  in 
Industry.  New  York:  The  Associa- 
tion.    Pp.  19. 


8o6 


THE  AMERICAN  JOURNAL  OF  SOCIOLOGY 


ARTICLES 


Anderson,  Miss  M.  M.  The  Welfare  of 
the  Illegitimate  Child  and  the  Nor- 
wegian Laws  of  1915.  The  Child 
(London),  11: 136-39,  Feb.  '21. 
Beatty,  Willard  W.  An  Experiment  in 
Applied  Sociology.  Elem.  Sch.  Jour. 
21:367-70,  Jan. '21. 
Berry,  C.  S.  Some  Problems  of  Ameri- 
canization as  Seen  by  Army  Psy- 
chologist. Sch.  and  Soc.  13:97-104, 
Jan. '21. 

Black,  Arthur.  Child  Welfare  Work  in 
Japan.    TheChild,  11: 129-31, Feb. '21. 

Bland,  J.  O.  P.  Moral  Factors  in 
Japanese  Policy.  Asia,  21:211-17, 
Mar.  '21. 

Bourdon,  Jean,  et  Berillon,  A.  La 
diminution  de  la  natalite  en  Grande- 
Bretagne.  Rev.internl.sociol.  28: 490- 
501,  Sept.-Oct.  '20. 

Darwin,  Leonard.  Some  Birth-Rate 
Problems.  Eug.  Rev.  12:279-90, 
Jan. '21. 

Davis,  Calvin  O.  Citizenship  and  the 
High  School.  Ed.  Rev.  61:214, 
Mar.  '21. 

Eldrige,  Seba.  The  College  and  the 
Local  Community.  (Work  of  the 
Soc.  Sci.  Dept.  at  Rockford  College.) 
Sch.  and  Home  Ed.  40:116,  Jan.  '21. 

Englis,  Prof.  Karl.  Die  wirtschaftliche 
Theorie  des  Geldes.  Archiv  f .  Sozw.  u. 
Sozp.  47: 271-336. 

Fuller,  Raymond  G.  Plav  Needs  and 
Work  Needs  of  Children.  Am.  Child 
2:345-258,  Feb.  '21. 

Gautier.  Nomad  and  Sedentary  Folks  of 
Northern  Africa.  Geog.  Rev.  11: 3-15, 
Jan.  '21. 

Hall,  G.  Dreams.  Scribner's  69:231- 
36,  Feb.  '21. 

Harley,  Herbert.  Segregation  vs.  Hang- 
ing. Jour.  Crim.  Law  &  Crim.  11: 
512-27,  Feb. '21. 

Henmon,  V.  A.  Measurement  of  Intel- 
ligence. Sch.  and  Soc.  13:151-58, 
Feb.  '21. 

Hirschberg,  Dr.  Max.  Bolschewismus. 
Archiv  f.  Sozw.  u.  Sozp.  48: 1-43. 

Hutchins,  B.  L.  The  Creative  Impulse 
in  Industry.  Conternp.  Rev.  119: 
207-14,  Feb.  '21. 

Jackson,  A.  S.  The  Negro's  Aspirations. 
Forum  65:  217-28,  Feb.  '21. 

Jenks,  A.  E.  The  Practical  Value  of 
Anthropology  to  Our  Nation.  Science 
53: 147-56,  Feb.  '21. 


Jenks,  A.  E.  The  Relation  of  Anthro- 
pology to  Americanization.  Sci.  Mo. 
22:  240-45,  Mar.  '21. 

Lacoin,  Gaston.  Raisons  qui  justifient 
I'institution  d'une  Contribution  na- 
tional et  d'une  Assurance  pour 
I'allegement  des  charges  des  families 
nombreuses.  Le  Musee  soc.  221-47, 
Oct.  '20. 

Lederer,  Prof.  Emil.  Die  Gewerkschafts- 
bewegimg  1918-19  und  die  Entfaltung 
der  wirtschaftlichen  Ideologien  in  der 
Arbeitsklasse.  Archiv  f.  Sozw.  u. 
Sozp.  47: 219-69. 

Leigh,  A.  B.  Children  Who  Come  into 
Juvenile  Court.  Child  Welf.  Mag. 
15:102-3,  Jan. '21. 

Lidgett,  J.  S.  The  Idea  of  Progress. 
London  Quar.  Rev.  No.  269,  Jan.  '21. 

Livi,  Livio.  I  morti  in  Europa  nella 
recente  guerra.  Riv.  inteml.  de  sci. 
soc.  74:3-18,  Jan.  '21. 

Lloyd,  J.  H.  Mental  Contagion  and 
Popular  Crazes.  Scribner's  69:  201-6, 
Feb.  '21. 

Mahalm,  Erneste.  L'Organisation  du 
Travail  de  la  Societe  des  Nations  et  la 
Conference  de  Washington.  Rev.  econ. 
internl.  4:849-914,  Dec.  '20. 

Michels,  Prof.  Robert.  Dogmenge- 
schichtliche  Beitrage  zur  Verelendungs- 
theorie.  Archiv  f.  Sozw.  u.  Sozp. 
47:122-53. 

Nelken,  Ingenieur.  Kriminalistik  und 
Technik.     Archiv  f.  Krim.  72:121-45. 

Priddy,  B.  L.  The  Woman  Mind  in 
Politics.  Nat.  Mun.  Rev.  10:171-76, 
Mar.  '21. 

Raynaud,  B.  Le  contrat  collectif au  point 
de  vue  internationale.  Rev.  ^con. 
internl.  3:242-79,  Sept.  '20. 

Revolutionizing  the  Apartment  House. 
House  Beautiful,  49: 186-87,  Mar.  '21. 

Richard,  Gaston.  L'Etat  et  la  soci6t6 
religieuse  dans  I'lnde  ancienne,  d'apr^s 
les  travaux  de  Vincent  Smith.  Rev. 
internl.  sociol.  28:602-23. 

Risler,  Georges.  Pour  le  developpement 
de  la  natalite  fran^aise.  Le  Mus6e  soc. 
181-219,  Sept.  '20. 

Shah,  J.  A.  A  Wedding  in  Afghanistan. 
Asia  21:  52-54,  Jan.  '21. 

Shreves,  Rolland  Merritt.  Play  and 
Education.    Educ.  41: 349-51,  Feb. '21. 

Slosson,  E.  E.  This  Changing  World — 
the  Expansion  of  Personality.  Inde- 
pendent 105:351-55,  Jan. '21. 


t-u