BOSTOIM
PUBLIC
LIBRARY
L
THE
AMERICAN NEGRO
IN THE
COMMUNIST PARTY
DECEMBER 22, 1954
U
Prepared and released by the
Committee on Un-American Activities, U. S. House of Representatives
Washington, D.O
COMMITTEE ON UN-AMERICAN ACTIVITIES
United States House op Representatives
HAROLD H. VELDE, Illinois, Chairman
BERNARD W. KEARNEY, New York FRANCIS ."E. WALTER, Pennsylvania
DONALD L. JACKSON, California MORGAN M. MOULDER, Missouri
KIT CLARDY, Michigan CLYDE DOYLE, California
GORDON H. SOHERER, Ohio JAMES B. FRAZIER, Jr., Tennessee
Robert L. Kunzig, Counsel
Frank S. Tavenner, Jr., Counsel
Thomas W. Beale, Sr., Chief Clerk
Raphael I. Nixon, Director of Research
Courtney E. Owens, Chief Investigator
n
Ml
r
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword 1
Background - 2
The Communist Line on "The Negro Nation" 4
The Negro Commission of the Communist Party 6
The Communist Betrayal of the American Negro 7
Communist Negro Front Organizations and Publications 10
Communist Activities Among Negro Youth 12
Index 14
in
.
Public Law 601, 79th Congress
The legislation under which the House Committee on Un-American
Activities operates is Public Law 601, 79th Congress [1946], chapter
753, 2d session, which provides:
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States
of America in Congress assembled, * * *
PART 2— RULES OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
* ******
Rule X
SEC. 121. STANDING COMMITTEES
*******
17. Committee on Un-American Activities, to consist of nine members.
*******
Rule XI
POWERS AND DUTIES OF COMMITTEES
*******
(q) (1) Committee on Un-American Activities.
(A) Un-American activities.
(2) The Committee on Un-American Activities, as a whole or by subcommit-
tee, is authorized to make from time to time investigations of (i) the extent,
character, and objects of un-American propaganda activities in the United States,
(ii) the diffusion within the United States of subversive and un-American propa-
ganda that is instigated from foreign countries or of a domestic origin and attacks
the principle of the form of government as guaranteed by our Constitution, and
(hi) all other questions in relation thereto that would aid Congress in any necessary
remedial legislation.
The Committee on Un-American Activities shall report to the House (or to the
Clerk of the House if the House is not in session) the results of any such investi-
gation, together with such recommendations as it deems advisable.
For the purpose of any such investigation, the Committee on Un-American
Activities, or any subcommittee thereof, is authorized to sit and act at such
times and places within the United States, whether or not the House is sitting,
has recessed, or has adjourned, to hold such hearings, to require the attendance
of such witnesses and the production of such books, papers, and documents, and
to take such testimony, as it deems necessary. Subpenas may be issued under
the signature of the chairman of the committee or any subcommittee, or by any
member designated by any such chairman, and may be served by any person
designated by any such chairman or member.
v
RULES ADOPTED BY THE 83D CONGRESS
House Resolution 5, January 3, 1953
-¥■ ^ ^ ^ ^ *p 3|»
Rule X
STANDING COMMITTEES
1. There shall be elected by the House, at the commencement of each Con-
gress, the following standing committees:
*******
(q) Committee on Un-American Activities, to consist of nine members.
*******
Rule XI
POWERS AND DUTIES OF COMMITTEES
*******
17. Committee on Un-American Activities.
(a) Un-American Activities.
(b) The Committee on Un-American Activities, as a whole or by subcommittee,
is authorized to make from time to time, investigations of (1) the extent, char-
acter, and objects of un-American propaganda activities in the United States,
(2) the diffusion within the United States of subversive and un-American prop-
aganda that is instigated from foreign countries or of a domestic origin and
attacks the principle of the form of government as guaranteed by our Constitu-
tion, and (3) all other questions in relation thereto that would aid Congress
in any necessary remedial legislation.
The Committee on Un-American Activities shall report to the House (or to the
Clerk of the House if the House is not in session) the results of any such investi-
gation, together with such recommendations as it deems advisable.
For the purpose of any such investigation, the Committee on Un-American
Activities, or any subcommittee thereof, is authorized to sit and act at such times
and places within the United States, whether or not the House is sitting, has
recessed, or has adjourned, to hold such hearings, to require the attendance
of such witnesses and the production of such books, papers, and documents, and
to take such testimony, as it deems necessary. Subpenas may be issued under
the signature of the chairman of the committee or any subcommittee, or by any
member designated by such chairman, and may be served by any person desig-
nated by any such chairman or member.
VI
THE AMERICAN NEGRO IN THE COMMUNIST PARTY
FOREWORD
The Communist Party in the United States of America, in its
continuing efforts to infiltrate and destroy the constitutional govern-
ment of this country, has made the minority groups in the United
States prime targets of attack. The control of majorities by minorities
is a fundamental precept of Marxism and the individual Communist
agent and party member has been drilled and schooled in the tech-
niques and tactics of achieving such control through organized and
pliable minorities. To this end the Communist conspiracy has
concentrated on capturing smaller groups with the ultimate objective
of seizure of the whole. One of the principal goals of the Communist
Party in the United States is the infiltration and control of the Negro
population in this country.
The House Committee on Un-American Activities has prepared
this report in order to demonstrate some of the efforts that have been
made by the Communist Party in this area and to recount the failure
of the Communist experiment. It is hoped that this report may be a
warning to other groups which find themselves, as minorities, targets
of Communist infiltration and deception.
The fact that the Communist conspiracy has experienced so little
success in attracting the American Negro to its cause reflects favorably
on the loyalty and integrity of the vast majority of the 15,000,000
Negro citizens. To attest to this fact we restate the words of Mr.
J. Edgar Hoover, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation,
which appeared in the Congressional Record of January 26, 1953:
We recently reviewed the origins of 5,395 of the leading members of the
Communist Party. The results were most interesting. Only 411 were Negroes
but of the remaining 4,984, we found that 4,555, or 9lV2 percent were either of
foreign birth or born of foreign parents. * * * The fact that only 411 Negroes
were found in this select group is strong evidence that the American Negro is
not hoodwinked by these false messiahs.
In furtherance of its traitorous design the Communist Party of the
United States has exploited issues of genuine concern to the American
Negro and all Americans. But as this report will show, the Com-
munist has always been guided by the directives from the leader-
ship of the international conspiracy and has betrayed the Negro's
cause whenever it was expedient to further the policies of turmoil,
dissention, and rebellion.
The House Committee on Un-American Activities does not possess
the power to bring quick solution to the undeniable and vexing social
and economic problems bearing on the harmonious coexistence of
American citizens of different races or creeds. The committee has
done everything in its power to nullify the efforts of certain groups to
use the committee as a means of fostering and furthering bigotry and
2 THE AMERICAN NEGRO EST THE COMMUNIST PARTY
intolerance.1 One thing is certain, however, and that is that there
has been no group within the United States or elsewhere which has
realized the solution of its problems by embracing the Communist
ideology.
The Communist has been adroit at exploiting social problems to
confuse rather than correct inequities and injustices. In no instance
is this fact more clearly exemplified than in the Communist efforts to
exploit racial problems in the United States. Testimony and records
of this committee establish beyond any doubt that the work of the
Communist Party has been one of the greatest deterrents to recognition
and realization of the legitimate aspirations of the American Negro.
In this, as in many fields, the efforts of the Communist have done
much to negate the efforts of sincere students and workers who have
tried genuinely to cope with social and economic problems in this field.
This report, the committee believes, will expose the true purposes of
the Communist Party in relation to this and other minority groups.
BACKGROUND
Information concerning the early efforts of the Communist Party
to infiltrate and influence the American Negro population is reflected
in the testimony of William Odell Nowell before the Special Commit-
tee on Un-American Activities on November 30, 1939. Nowell, an
American Negro, had been a member and officer of the Communist
Party, USA, from the summer of 1929 until the latter part of 1936.
He testified that in 1929 he had gone to Russia as a representative of
the Communist Party of the United States. While in Russia he
had several conferences with the Negro department of the Communist
International and he testified that during the years 1928-30 the Com-
munist International formulated a new program with respect to the
American Negro.
Nowell recounted that the question of the American Negro had first
arisen at the Second World Congress of the Communist International
in 1920, at which time the American Negro had been discussed as a
"national" minority rather than a "racial" minority. The discussions
and plans considered during the 1928-30 period were to carry out a
program to organize a separate Negro state and government in the
southern part of the United States.
These discussions in the Negro department of the Communist
International, according to Nowell, eventually led to the issuance
of a resolution from the executive committee of the Communist
International to the Communist Party in the United States. This
resolution extablished the new program for Communist efforts to
organize the American Negro. According to Nowell, the Communists
theorized that American Negroes throughout some hundred-odd
counties extending from Virginia to the Mississippi delta comprised a
national minority, a national group, and a majority of the population
throughout that area. The resolution directed that the Communist
Party in the United States should organize the Negroes in that area
along the line of a "revolutionary program" to ally them with the
workers, or the "proletariat" as the Communists called them, and to
use the Negro as a force supplementing and assisting the party in
1 See "Preliminary Report on Neo-Fascist and Hate Groups," published by the House Committee on
Un- American Activities on December 17, 1954
THE AMERICAN NEGRO IN THE COMMUNIST PARTY 3
carrying out a policy of revolution. Nowell testified that this southern
state composed of Negroes was to be considered a "buffer state," that
it was to be a state established on the Soviet plan and under Soviet
leadership. Nowell testified that the Communist strategy in this
program was plain and he stated:
The plans were carefully laid out that in the event perhaps if it were not pos-
sible to organize such a state before a revolution took place in the United States,
but in the event that this country went to war, let us say, with Japan, or found
itself for other reasons, due to depression or any circumstance that might weaken
the national economy and arouse a great deal of discontent throughout the
country, this would be the time to strike; this would be the time to utilize this
position to set up a Negro republic in the South.
The 1930 resolution of the executive committee of the Communist
International, according to Nowell, stated very definitely that the
Communist Party should organize the colored people of the South
for the purpose of setting up a separate state and government in the
South. Nowell recognized the Communists' purpose as twofold and
described these as follows:
In the course of publicizing, agitating for the immediate demands for the
poor farmers, and so forth in the South, this movement would gain momentum.
Therefore, the resolution states in any contingency, while the workers of the
North, or the industrial workers throughout the country were organizing to
strike against the system of capitalism for their independence, and for the over-
throw and the setting up of the dictatorship of the proletariat, this national
minority will bring up the rear, so to speak. That is, its revolt will serve as a
tremendous means of weakening the entire system and therefore furthering
the possibility for the industrial workers of the North to achieve their objectives.
At this point the committee cannot stress too strongly that this
program was one formulated by the executive committee of the Com-
munist International and not even by the Communist Party of the
United States. There is no evidence that any responsible member
or element of the Negro people in the United States did then or does
now advocate such a course of action as called for in the Communist
program. The fact is that this program of the Communists has with
the passage of time proven to be one of the greatest deterrents to
recruitment of American Negroes into the Communist Party.
Mr. Nowell in his 1939 testimony pointed out that the pursuit of
such a program by the Communist Party could only result in the
eventual sacrifice of the American Negro, a thing which, according to
Nowell, would not be foreign to the Communist code of operations.
Mr. Nowell described this eventual outcome in this manner:
So, hence, I have found out through my long experience and through further
theoretical investigation and study that the whole policy of the establishment of
a Negro republic in the South, even the practical attempts to work out such a
program in its more elemental stages and form can only lead to race riots and
victimizations of the colored people of the South, chaos, and eventually to a com-
plete sacrifice offer by the party itself. Whether this was subjectively, consciously
carried out for that purpose, I should not like to think so, that it was the intention
of all those people who got up there and plugged for it.
There will be more details devoted to the Communist Party plan
for a separate state for the American Negro. However, in considering
the early background of the American Negro and the Communist
Party, we must review the efforts of the Communist Party to utilize
the American Negro for propaganda purposes.
Testimony relevant to this feature of the Communist International
was received by the House Committee on Un-American Activities in
55160—54 2
4 THE AMERICAN NEGRO IN THE COMMUNIST PARTY
San Francisco, Calif., on December 1, 1953, from Mr. Louis Rosser.
Rosser testified that he had been a member of the Communist Party
and the Young Communist League in the United States from 1932
until December 1944. He stated that he, as a Negro, joined the
Communist Party because he believed that the party was fighting
against discrimination. Rosser testified that in 1932 the Communist
Party gathered together a group of reputable young Negro intellectuals
and persuaded them to visit the Soviet Union. The purpose of this
visit was ostensibly to make a motion picture in Russia. The movie
was to be a distorted Russian version of Negro life in America, and
the movie was to be exhibited in Africa and Asia. Rosser pointed
out that this excursion to Russia failed to convert these young Ameri-
can Negroes. Instead, some of those who saw Russia as it really is,
are among the foremost anti-Communists in America today.
THE COMMUNIST LINE ON "THE NEGRO NATION"
It has been pointed out previously in the testimony of William Odell
Nowell that as early as the Second World Congress of the Communist
International in 1920, the Communists had decided to cast the
American Negro as a member of a "national minority." This program
serves as an excellent example of the deceit of the Communists and
the manner in which they adapt any problem, social or otherwise, to
their own selfish and dedicated ends. They have exploited this theme
of Negro liberation when it served their purposes and abandoned it
temporarily when it was considered expedient or opportunistic to
cast it aside.
We have seen what the Communist approach to this problem was
during the period 1928-30. The Communist policy 10 years later
was described by Mr. Louis Rosser. He testified that he had attended
the 1938 World Congress of the Communist International, and there
the Communists had devised a slogan of rebellion for the Negro
people. The Communist tactic during this period was to use the
American Negro to create confusion and disunity and in this manner
to assist in bringing about the real aim of the Communist, a proletarian
revolution. During this period of time the Communist International
considered that war was imminent. It reasoned that this would either
be a war against the Soviet Union, or a war between the capitalist
nations. If it should be a war involving the Soviet Union, it was the
Communist intention to use the American Negro as a means of creating
disunity. Rosser described the Communist attitude in this manner:
Their (the Communist) policy changes as the world situation changes. * * *
the policy of the Communist Party of America is tied up with the defense of the
Soviet Union. If things are running all right, the Communist Party makes partial
demands for the Negroes; they take it easy. If things are going rough, and they
think the Soviet Union is in danger, the Communist Party raises this slogan again
of rebellion trying to organize the Negroes to rebel.
Rosser also testified before the committee that this question of the
so-called liberation of the American Negro was objected to even by
those few Negroes who are members and officers of the Communist
Party. He said:
In the ranks of the Communist Party there have been big discussions on this
question, and the majority of the Negro Communists have opposed this and have
accused the party of attempting to segregate the Negroes once the revolution is
had and they have also accused them — said that if the Negro would rebel in the
THE AMERICAN NEGRO IN THE COMMUNIST PARTY 5
South, the rest of this country would shoot them down like a bunch of dogs,
so you can see it is a tactic of the party.
During the period of 1943-45, when Earl Browder, then leader of
the Communist Party, called for a united front for both the Com-
munists and capitalists and offered the theory that communism and
capitalism could co-exist in the world, the IS! egro program was changed.
Browder informed the National Committee of the Communist Party
in America that the Negro was opposed to the establishment of a
separate state and that the Communist approach to the question had
been a mistake. The Communist Party also had been renamed
the Communist Political Association under Browder's leadership.
Browder was deposed in 1945, and the Communist Party resumed its
original name. The Communist Party also then revived its original
policy on the Negro question — the eventual establishment of a sepa-
rate Negro state.
Following the reconstitution of the Communist Party and the ouster
of Browder in 1945, the Negro question was one of the key issues dealt
with by the Communist leaders. The committee received valuable
and informed testimony on these actions from Mrs. Barbara Hartle,
who testified for several days in Seattle, Wash., during June 1954.
Mrs. Hartle is a former official of the Communist Party who testified
freely and fully, notwithstanding the fact that she had been convicted
and sentenced to prison for violation of the Smith Act. Mrs. Hartle
furnished the committee with first-hand information concerning the
program devised by the Communist leaders in the United States for
the American Negro following the dissolution of the Communist
Political Association and the reconstitution of the Communist Party.
On this issue she stated:
According to the Communist theory the Black Belt is the area of Negro majority
in the South. It cuts across State and county lines, comprises more than a
hundred counties, and it is the Negro people in this area who are a nation. The
rest of the Negro people in our country are not a part of this nation, according
to Communist definition. They are, instead of being a part of a nation, they
are a national minority, just as the Mexican people, Slavic people, Jewish people,
or other persons of a definite origin are considered a national minority.
According to the Communist theory, not all nations are oppressed nations, but
the Negro nation in the United States of America is considered an oppressed
nation, and every real — and I do believe that there are real problems of the
Negro people in the United States of America — and every imagined problem is
used by the Communist Party as proof that the Negro people is an oppressed
nation in this country.
But the basic proof that the Communist Party uses is that the Negro people
in the South do not own the land in anywhere near the same proportion as white
people do.
And so the Communist theory says that the basic problem of the Negro nation
is land reform.
Mrs. Hartle related that while the Communist Party used these
various arguments for the establishment of a separate Negro state,
the motivating force is still one of disunity, confusion and eventual
revolution. She explained the ultimate Communist objective in this
way:
In order for the working class to be able to assume power, led by the Com-
munist Party — it is never conceived in the Communist Party that anyone but
the Communist Party could lead this working class in assuming power — the work-
ing class must mobilize all the allies it can who will go along with it. If the Negro
nation will rise and force its own self-determination for land reform and for other
things that the Negro people do want or should want — if they would do this in
concert with the working class, this, along with what other allies that might be
6 THE AMERICAN NEGRO IN THE COMMUNIST PARTY
mobilized along many other lines, should make a sufficiently strong force to up-
set the power of the capitalist class and create enough support to make it possible
for the working class to retain power after seizing it. And it is frankly recognized
in Communist theory that the whole strategy is not for the main purpose of
Negro liberation but for the purpose of the proletarian revolution and this is not
hidden in Communist theory.
Mrs. Hartle testified that in 1945 she was 1 of 4 delegates from the
northwest region at the Communist Party's reconstitution convention
held in New York City. She related how the problem of the Negro
was taken up at that time:
That problem was taken up at that time, and there was quite a lot of discussion
there about how to face the question. The problem was that the Negro people,
Black Belt or not, very evidently don't want to be considered as a nation — are
very much opposed to anything that smacks of separation from our country, of
being set aside separately, and the point was made that, while this basic theoreti-
cal position was correct and had to be adhered to, that it should not be blared
forth in any immediate programs, any more than you would go to a labor union
with a resolution on a raise in wages and then tack on that this is in the best
interests of the proletarian revolution. And that is the way it was explained, and
that is why I made the point that it is like the national question as a part of the
front technique.
Further describing the attitude of the American Negro toward self-
betterment, she said:
My own experience with the Negro people in and around the Communist
Party had been that they are extremely interested in achieving a status of
equality with other people; but until they are influenced by communism, it has
never even entered their heads or their hearts that this ever needs to be in any
way connected with disloyalty to our country. They consider equality as morally
right and can be fairly easily attracted into front work that is skillfully done * * *
If a campaign is launched by the Communist Party that isn't very clearly in
the interests of the Negro people, it is my experience that they will detect these
extraneous matters very rapidly and see ulterior motives very quickly, and for
this reason, I believe the Communist Party is forced to act in its so-called. sin-
cere way. If the Communist Party wants to make any headway among the
Negro people, it cannot crowd the issue; it has to work out a simple campaign
directly based on a need or right of the Negro people and not crowd in other
matters rapidly, or the Negro people will just disappear from it.
And if the Communist Party sets up a goal, like a job in a Safeway store, and
puts on a picket line, maybe the Negro people will feel, "Well, it would be a good
idea to have a job for a Negro in a store," but if you start carrying banners, you
know, about 3 or 4 other subjects, this is very quickly detected, and the Negro
people stay away from and don't want to be involved with a lot of other matters,
involved matters that according to my understanding as best as I can under-
stand it, is that they don't want to be disloyal to the country and they don't want
to fight for things that they don't consider to be morally right.
Mrs. Hartle summed up her experience with the Negro question
and the loyalty of the great majority of the American Negroes in
this manner:
All of my experiences with the Negro people have indicated no evidence of any
desire to be disloyal or even a thought of being disloyal until they became some-
what acquainted with Communist theory and began to think that the only way they
could get their rights was to be somewhat involved with these other matters. They
had to be convinced by the Communist Party and by Marxist-Leninist theory,
and it wasn't an easy thing to do in most cases.
THE NEGRO COMMISSION OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY
There has been considerable testimony before the House Com-
mittee on Un-American Activities on the organizational structure of
THE AMERICAN NEGRO IN THE COMMUNIST PARTY 7
the Communist Party dealing with the Negro question. In de-
scribing the structure Mrs. Hartle testified in Seattle as follows:
As a part of the emphasis on the Negro question, the Communist Party has
established commissions, standing committees, in the national setup, in the dis-
tricts, in the divisions of the districts, the regions, and even into the divisions of
the regions, the sections, so that a system of standing committees on the Negro
question is in existence much more developed than on any other questions that
the Communist Party involves itself with.
These committees are devoted to bringing about the execution of Communist
policy and program. They are subcommittees of the leading committee of the
particular jurisdiction and are responsible to it fully. And especially since the
reconstitution of the Communist Party the practice has been to assign top people,
top Communist leaders, along with others, on these Negro commissions. And
my own work on the district Negro commission was a district executive board
assignment.
In describing the operations of the Negro commissions of the Com-
munist Party and the manner in which they carried out the Com-
munist Party line, Mrs. Hartle stated:
Yes; these Negro commissions followed the party line exactly the same as any
other commissions or subcommittees or leading committees.
The purpose of the commission was not to have a separate line or program, but
to develop a program of action to bring this line into effect among the Negro
people.
After the leading committee approves of a line and program, the commission
proceeds to assign specific persons and specific groups to carry out certain parts
of the desired work. And a great deal of advice and attention is given by the
district and national leadership to the Negro commission — nationally, in the dis-
trict and in the regions, this is the case. Many articles of guidance are published
in Political Affairs, which is the theoretical organ of the Communist Party, and
there is really fundamentally no difference at all theoretically or organizationally
between the Communist Party's work on the Negro question and on any other
question. This is not any kind of an independent field, where the Communist
Party operates, say, as a sort of service organization.
It is greatly desired, though, by the Communist Party that people should view
their work in the field of Negro rights as a sort of special -service work. It is
greatly desired that especially the Negro people should view it as such, but that
is not the case; it is not a service organization — the Communist Party is not a
service organization in a certain way for the Negro people. It is a Communist
Party and its attitude toward the Negro people and Negro nation is exactly the
same as that to any other group in respect to its objective.
THE COMMUNIST BETRAYAL OF THE AMERICAN
NEGRO
Throughout the testimony of individuals informed on Communist
exploitation of the American Negro, it has become clear that when-
ever the occasion presented itself the Communist Party did not
hesitate to betray the interests of the American Negro.
Testimony relating to such betrayals was received from Mr. Shel-
ton Tappes, a Negro union leader of Local 600, United Auto Workers,
CIO, who appeared before the committee on March 12, 1952, in
Detroit, Mich. It should be pointed out that while Mr. Tappes
attended some Communist Party meetings, he testified he never
became a member of the Communist Party.
On the betrayal of the Negro by the Communist Party, Mr. Tappes
had this to say:
* * * I also feel that the major problems such as lynching, the poll tax, and
fair employment practices are matters that the American people should very
vigorously attend to, but I don't agree with the Communist Party of the United
States who has installed itself as the one agency designed to solve the problems
8 THE AMERICAN NEGRO IN THE COMMUNIST PARTY
of the Negro people — I do not believe and I know that they are not sincere in
their efforts. They have only grabbed the Negro issue as a means through which
they can attain the help and support of 15 million Negro people in this country in
furthering their policies of the Soviet Union which they are attached to.
I know there have been occasions when the Communist Party could have
proven their sincerity but other parts of their program have been predominant
to the point that they were willing to forego the rights of the Negro people in order
to solve their international interest, particularly on their attitude on Negro
questions during the last war.
I know of at least one instance and that is the instance of a doctor in the city
of Detroit who had been drafted into the United States Navy and insisted that in
answering the draft call, he should be drafted as a physician because he was then
a practicing medical doctor in this city. I suppose he didn't know too much
about the Communist Party as to its sincerity and he went to them for help and
they turned him down saying that winning the war was primary and all of those
things would have to wait until the war is over.
One other instance was mentioned yesterday. I remember this particularly
because I had a personal experience when the National Association for the Ad-
vancement of Colored People advanced as its program the double V program.
That was known as victory at home and victory abroad in which they have un-
slintingly supported the war effort of the country but still contented themselves
with the domestic programs feeling that both were consistent and the interest
was the same — we must win both of those battles — and the Communist Party
was out-spokenly critical of the at-home portion of that double victory program.
So I could conclude by saying that the Communist Party does not represent
the chosen spokesmen for the Negro people and that the Negro people know that
there are many patriotic persons and patriotic organizations with whom they can
associate themselves, in whom they know they have a real honest and sincere
interest in seeing that complete democracy is a prevalent thing in this Nation.
Some of the most enlightening testimony on the vacillations of the
Communist Party in its exploitation of the cause of the American
Negro was that given by Mr. Louis Rosser, who has been previously
referred to. Mr. Rosser attributed his eventual break from the
Communist Party to the party 's easy betrayal of the Negro. He
cited as an example the Communists' change in attitude toward the
Negro at the time of the signing of the Stalin-Hitler Pact on August
23, 1939.
Mr. Rosser stated that the Communist Party followed a "united
front" policy from 1935 up to the signing of the pact, and during that
period the party had devoted considerable time and effort to fur-
thering the employment of Negroes in industry. Mr. Rosser said
that at that time it appeared that Negroes were making positive
steps in their efforts to seek employment on an equal basis.
Communist Party policy changed abruptly upon Stalin's alliance
with Hitler in 1939, however, and the party instructed its members
to make every effort to sabotage the United States defense mobiliza-
tion, Mr. Rosser stated. He said that as part of this sabotage effort,
the Communist Party even attempted to destroy Negro gains which
the party itself had previously worked for. The Communist Party's
actions in this respect after the Stalin-Hitler Pact stood out in startling
contrast to those by non-Communist trade unions and other groups,
which continued to work for better employment opportunities for
American Negroes.
Mr. Rosser related that the Communist Party line during the
Stalin-Hitler Pact sought to dissuade American Negroes from answer-
ing a draft call in the event a draft were ordered, on the alleged
ground that the Army was segregated. The party even went so far
as to discourage Negroes from giving blood to the Red Cross on the
claim that Negro blood was being segregated. Meanwhile, the
THE AMERICAN NEGRO EST THE COMMUNIST PARTY 9
Communist Party was also preaching that the capitalist world was
going to attack the Soviet Union, and warning Communists in the
United States to be ready to lead the American working class in turning
their guns against their own leaders.
Mr. Rosser related a particularly striking incident in which the
Communist Party endeavored to sabotage the sincere efforts of
reputable American Negroes to seek betterment for the Negro people :
What caused me to break with the party: The party raised the point during
this period of Hitler's attack on the Soviet Union that we must fight for jobs, but
we must see to it that the Negro organizations do not go out of bounds, and to
give an example, the Negro press kept presenting, even during the time, that the
FEPC that Roosevelt signed was too weak, Executive Order No. 8802. It didn't
have any teeth in it, and Randolph, a leader of the pullman porters and the
Negro people, and Walter White kept pushing for Roosevelt to put teeth in it,
and the Negro press carried a campaign of double V; victory at home and victory
abroad — this double V program. The party got sore because the party was
carrying a program of open-the-second-front, and the party felt that the program
of these Negro leaders and the Negro press— the leaders of America would think
that the Communists were pushing these programs. So in a meeting of the Negro
Commission in southern California it was decided that, and I am sure this came
from New York, we should put pressure on the Negro press by getting prominent
Negroes to write to Roosevelt and to the Justice Department that the Negro
press was inflammatory, and it was dividing the war effort; it was against the war
effort.
Randolph had threatened to march on Washington during the Hitler Pact.
He had threatened to march a hundred thousand Negroes to Washington if they
didn't sign an FEPC, and after they got it, he threatened again to get teeth in it.
The Communist Party said that he had to be muzzled, and he was coming to
Los Angeles in 1942, and I and Pettis Perry were given the job of working out a
plan how we could discredit Randolph, which the
Mr. Scherer: Randolph was a Negro?
Mr. Rosser: Yes, a top Negro. So he was getting a medal that the National
Association for the Advancement of Colored People give each year to some out-
standing American Negro, white, or any nationality in the field of human relations,
and he was getting it for his work of integration of Negroes into industry, and we
found out that a fellow traveler, Mrs. Charlotta Bass, was speaking the night
before he was speaking. Mrs. Bass' nephew, who was a writer on the paper —
she has a paper — had a paper rather, the California Eagle— was a member of the
Young Communist League.
We got together with him and convinced him to convince his aunt, Mrs. Bass,
who already was close to the Communists, but not that close, to allow us to help
with her speech, and she agreed, and we wrote a speech that praised the Soviet
Union, that called for the opening of the second front, and that said Randolph
was a traitor to his country, that his threatened march on Washington was a
march that would bring chaos and disunite our country at a time when unity is
needed, and she made that speech, and it created havoc. But it gave the party
not only the opportunity to discredit this Negro leader, but it gave the party the
opportunity to reach the top Negroes in America with the program of the Com-
munist Party at that time.
This attitude of the Communist Party, according to Mr. Rosser,
was in sharp contrast to that which the Communist Party adopted
after Hitler invaded the Soviet Union and the United States had
entered the war. He recalled that in August 1944 there was an
explosion in the ammunition dump at Port Chicago, Calif. He
recalled that following this explosion there was newspaper publicity
indicating that Negro sailors were refusing to load any more ships
with ammunition because of the explosion and further, that news-
paper accounts indicated these Negro sailors might be subject to
court-martial for their refusal. Rosser stated that upon learning of
these facts, he went to the Communist headquarters in San Francisco
and asked Communist leader William Schneiderman what action the
10 THE AMERICAN NEGRO IN THE COMMUNIST PARTY
Communist Party would take if there were an attempt to court-
martial the sailors. Mr. Rosser told Schneiderman: "Ever since I
have been in the party, every time something happens to a Negro,
the Communists say, 'Let's do something'." Rosser testified that
Schneiderman's response to this inquiry was: "Rosser, what is more
important, loading those ships standing in the harbor for the Soviet
Union or those 50 men over there who are going to jail?" Rosser
stated that this, coupled with his experience of other betrayals of the
American Negroes by the Communist Party, finally determined his
action in breaking from the Communist Party.
COMMUNIST NEGRO FRONT ORGANIZATIONS AND
PUBLICATIONS
In order to extend its influence, the Communist Party has long
sought to infiltrate and gain control of many legitimate organizations.
In many instances, therefore, Communists have attached themselves
to non-Communist organizations which were genuinely working in
behalf of the American Negro.
For the same purpose, the Communist Party has also created hun-
dreds of organizations of its own, commonly known as "front" groups.
The groups usually have euphonious titles and slogans designed to
disguise the actual Communist control. Many of these "front"
organizations created by the Communist Party have had titles and/or
programs specifically aimed at attracting support from America's
Negro population.
Mr. Manning Johnson, who testified before the committee on July
14, 1949, in Washington, D. C, is a former Communist who was par-
ticularly active in the party's efforts to recruit Negro members.
From the testimony of Mr. Johnson, as well as others who have
testified before the committee, it appears that the most prominent
and important Communist Negro fronts in the past have been the
American Negro Labor Congress, the League of Struggle for Negro
Rights, the National Negro Labor Congress, and the National Negro
Congress.
Some of the first testimony relating to these Communist fronts was
given by William Odell Nowell, previously referred to. Nowell testi-
fied that after he had received instructions in the Soviet Union and
returned to the United States, the Communist Party placed him as
president of the American Negro Labor Congress. In his testimony
he recounted how in 1929 or 1930 this organization was changed over
to the League of Struggle for Negro Rights, and, very soon thereafter,
the National Negro Labor Congress was formed.
Manning Johnson stated that the American Negro Labor Congress
and the League of Struggle for Negro Rights had been ineffective and
that the national committee of the Communist Party in 1935 dis-
cussed the general situation among Negroes. As a result of this dis-
cussion it was decided that the time was appropriate for the formation
of a broad and all-inclusive organization dealing with the American
Negro and his problem. Upon the recommendation of one of the
members of the Negro Commission of the Communist Party present,
it was decided the Communist Party should organize the National
Negro Congress. Johnson testified that James W. Ford and the
Negro Commission of the Communist Party were given the respon-
sibility of organizing the National Negro Congress. Their first step,
THE AMERICAN NEGRO IN THE COMMUNIST PARTY 11
according to Johnson, was to approach a non-Communist, A. Philip
Randolph, who agreed to become head of the National Negro Con-
gress. Johnson testified that this organization received a response
that was surprising even to the Communist Party, and that its early
meetings had representatives from all walks of Negro life, as well as
from the white population in the United States. He recounted how
the Second National Negro Congress, which was held in 1937, was
even more successful than the first meeting of this group. However,
by the time the Third National Negro Congress was held it had
become obvious to A. Philip Randolph and many other non-Com-
munists that this organization was controlled completely by the
Communist Party. Randolph resigned after making a public protest
to this effect.
Further and more recent testimony concerning the activities of the
National Negro Congress was furnished the committee by Mrs.
Dorothy K. Funn, in New York City on May 4, 1953.
Mrs. Funn testified that she had been a member of the Communist
Party from May 1939 until June of 1946, and that during the period
from 1943 until 1946 she was the legislative representative of the
National Negro Congress in Washington, D. C. Mrs. Funn stated
that the National Negro Congress was a puppet of the Communist
Party and that the program of the National Negro Congress was
dictated by the Negro Commission of the Communist Party.
Mrs. Funn stated that she had joined the Communist Party and
had commenced her activity in the Negro Congress because of the
feeling that the Communist Party and the Congress were means of
assisting the Negro race. Mrs. Funn explained this feeling and her
realization of the Communist betrayal in this manner:
You know, the cause — -I'll answer you, sir — the cause of the Negro is a very
touching one and one on which a lot needs to be done yet, and my feeling and
conclusion is that the Communist Party took this great need that Negroes in
America feel as a basis for exploiting of their wants, desires, and the things that
they were working for, which were not for complete justice and equality for the
Negro but it lends itself beautifully to an emotional tieup, and you can say,
"Well, if this is the organization that's going to do this, therefore, this is the
organization with which I want to affiliate myself."
Mrs. Funn also explained that the National Negro Congress ceased
to exist in 1947 and that its activities were turned over to the Civil
Rights Congress, another Communist-front organization.
One of the Communist fronts currently active in seeking to deceive
American Negroes into serving the Communist cause is the National
Negro Labor Council, which was first cited by this committee in its
annual report of December 28, 1952.
The organization was formally founded at a conference held in
Cincinnati, Ohio, October 27 and 28, 1951, under the direction of
leading Negro Communists in the United States, such as Abner
Berry, Sam W. Parks, and Coleman A. Young. According to the
latest available information, Young is the present national executive
secretary of the organization, from which post he controls and directs
NNLC activities.
The National Negro Labor Council deceitfully states that its pur-
pose is the union of "all Negro workers with other suffering minorities
and our allies among the white workers" in order to obtain "first-class
citizenship based on economic, political, and social equality." A
study of the operation of the council shows that, rather than helping
the Negro worker, it has been a deterrent to him. For example, it
12 THE AMERICAN NEGRO IN THE COMMUNIST PARTY
has made charges of Negro discrimination against the United Auto
Workers, CIO, which has done much to advance the cause of the
Negro worker. In fact, the Council has continuously attempted to
discredit the efforts of non-Communist organizations. It has encour-
aged disunity, rather than unity, and thereby performed a distinct
disservice to the cause of the Negro worker.
The committee believes it would be helpful at this point to list
organizations and publications which have been officially cited as
Communist fronts by the Attorney General and by the Committee on
Un-American Activities.
Organizations Cited by Both the Attorney General and the Committee on
Un-American Activities
American Negro Labor Congress
Civil Rights Congress
International Workers Order
National Negro Congress
National Negro Labor Council
Negro Labor Victory Committee
Southern Negro Youth Congress
Organizations Cited by the Attorney General
Committee for a Democratic Far Eastern Policy
Committee for the Negro in the Arts
Committee to Aid the Fighting South
Council on African Affairs
George Washington Carver School
Harlem Trade Union Council
Labor Council for Negro Rights
Philadelphia Labor Council for Negro Rights
Tri-State Negro Trade Union Council
United Harlem Tenants and Consumer Organization
United Negro and Allied Veterans of America
Veterans Against Discrimination of the Civil Rights Congress of New York
Organizations Cited by the Committee on Un-American Activities
Committee to Defend Angelo Herndon
Council of Young Southerners (also known as League of Young Southerners)
League for Protection of Minority Rights
League of Struggle for Negro Rights
National Emergency Committee to Stop Lynching
Negro Peoples Committee To Aid Spanish Democracy
Scottsboro Defense Committee
Publication
Liberator
COMMUNIST ACTIVITIES AMONG NEGRO YOUTH
Throughout its history in the United States, the Communist Party
has directed intense efforts to infiltrate and influence the youth of
America. It has established such Communist fronts for youth as the
Young Communist League, the American Youth for Democracy and
the present'Communist youth group, the Labor Youth League.
The committee has also received testimony concerning the efforts
of the Communist Party to infiltrate and influence the Negro youth of
America. Some of the most descriptive testimony concerning these
efforts was furnished the committee by Foster Williams, Jr., who
appeared before the committee on June 17, 1954, in Seattle Wash.
Williams, a 24-year-old Negro, testified that he became a member of
the American Youth for Democracy in the latter part of 1946, and
THE AMERICAN NEGRO IN THE COMMUNIST PARTY 13
eventually his association with this group brought him into member-
ship in the Communist Party.
Williams testified that after becoming an active member in the
Communist Party he continued his activities in the American Youth
for Democracy and was given instructions by the Communist Party
to infiltrate other youth groups. One such group that he had been
instructed to influence was a youth organization of the National
Association for the Advancement of Colored People, a non-Communist
organization. The experiences of Mr. Williams in the Communist
Party were succinctly described in these words:
The Communist Party has a very despicable policy in regard to the American
Negro. They tell him they are the only organization that is trying to help the
Negro advance in obtaining all of his democratic rights that are justifiably his.
Many Negroes, for a short period of time, believe this, but once you actually join
the Communist Party and begin to work with them, you see how the Communist
Party very sneakily manipulates the Negro people for their own purposes. They
take up any kind of flimsy cause and the Communist Party supports it. This
usually is the "kiss of death." The NAACP has had this trouble in the past of
defending Negroes for various crimes and there has been a chance of getting com-
mutation of sentence. The Communist Party is not interested in the welfare of
the Negro, but simply takes these cases up to make propaganda. In connection
with that, sir, if it is possible, I have a statement here which I prepared last night
in which I take up some of the questions you raised.
I am very proud of the gains that the American Negro has achieved so far.
A race almost entirely illiterate in the period following the Civil War, illiteracy
has presently dwindled down to the vanishing point.
Recently the Supreme Court issued a historic decision which will speed us
toward the goal of complete literacy. We have contributed many outstanding
Americans, who have very ably served their country. To name but two, Dr.
Ralph Bunche and Dr. Channing Tobias, who have represented the American
people in the U. N. To these should be added the name of the late George
Washington Carver.
Lynchings, once a dark blot on our Southland, are now considered a thing of
the past. Earlier this year the Tuskegee Institute issued a report stating that
not a single lynching occurred during the year 1953.
Our cultural achievements include the worldwide acceptance of Negro folk
music as part and parcel of the American scene.
The American Negro has also served his country in time of war. In World
War II he fought and died on many a foreign battlefield to help stem the tide of
Axis aggression. In Korea he grappled alongside his white comrades in arms
against the Red hordes of communism.
In looking at the achievements and contributions of the American Negro, we
see at once that they have been made within the framework of our American
political system. It is preposterous to think that the Negro will embrace the
evil octopus of communism. Communism is not in the least interested in helping
the Negro, but only in furthering its evil, monstrous ends.
I believe it goes without saying that the American Negro will continue to make
progress within our democratic framework, while at the same time rejecting the
falsehoods of communism.
In closing I would like to say that I believe that this committee is doing an
excellent job in cutting out the cancer of communism before it eats into the vitals
of our great Nation. And may I assure this committee they have the support of
the overwhelming majority of Negroes, who are loyal American citizens.
CONCLUSION
From the facts set forth in this report, the committee can only con-
clude that the vast majority of Americans of the Negro race have
consistently resisted the blandishments and treacherous promises
offered them by the Communist conspirators. The committee hopes
that this detailed exposure of the true Communist aims and tactics in
relation to the Negro people will serve even further to reduce the
extremely limited and temporary Negro support which the Com-
munists have obtained by subterfuge.
INDEX
Individuals
Page
Bass, Charlotta 9
Berry, Abner 11
Browder, Earl 5
Bunche, Ralph 13
Carver, George Washington 13
Ford, James W 10
Funn, Dorothy K 11
Johnson, Manning 10
Hartle, Barbara 5-7
Hoover, J. Edgar
Nowell, William Odell 2-4, 10
Parks, Sam W 11
Randolph, A. Philip 9, 11
Roosevelt 9
Rosser, Louis 4, 8-10
Schneiderman, William 9, 10
Tappes, Shelton 7
Tobias, Channing 13
White, Walter 9
Williams, Foster, Jr 12, 13
Young, Coleman 11
Organizations
American Negro Labor Congress 10, 12
American Youth for Democracy 12
Civil Rights Congress 11, 12
Committee for a Democratic Far Eastern Policy 12
Committee for the Negro in the Arts 12
Committee To Aid the Fighting South 12
Committee To Defend Angelo Herndon 12
Communist International 2-4
Second World Congress 2, 4
1938 World Congress 4
Communist Party, Negro Commission 10, 11
Council of Young Southerners 12
Council on African Affairs 12
Federal Bureau of Investigation 1
George Washington Carver School 12
Harlem Trade Union Council 12
International Workers' Order 12
League for Protection of Minority Rights 12
League of Young Southerners 12
Labor Council for Negro Rights 12
Labor Youth League 12
League of Struggle for Negro Rights 10, 12
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People 8, 9, 13
National Emergency Committee To Stop Lynching 12
National Negro Congress — 10-12
National Negro Labor Congress 10
National Negro Labor Council H> 12
Negro Labor Victory Committee - 12
Negro People's Committee to Aid Spanish Democracy 12
Philadelphia Labor Council for Negro Rights 12
15
16 INDEX
Page
Red Cross 8
Scottsboro Defense Committee 12
Southern Negro Youth Congress 12
Tri-State Negro Trade Union Council 12
Tuskegee Institute 13
United Auto Workers, CIO 12
Local 600 7
United Harlem Tenants and Consumer Organization 12
United Nations 13
United Negro and Allied Veterans of America 12
Veterans Against Discrimination of the Civil Rights Congress of New York. 12
Young Communist League 4, 9, 12
Publications
California Eagle 9
Liberator 12
Political Affairs 7
o
BOSTON PUBLIC LIBRARY
illliil
3 9999 05982 502 4