THE
\J %J JLi
Charles Sherwood Farms
ST?L
THE AMERICAN SOUL
Digitized by the Internet Archive
in 2012 with funding from
The Institute of Museum and Library Services through an Indiana State Library LSTA Grant
http://www.archive.org/details/americansoulappOOfarr
o
O
O o
Eh W
l— l
Ph v
< £
s ^
P.
THE
American Soul
AN APPRECIATION OF THE FOUR GREATEST
AMERICANS AND THEIR LESSON FOR
PRESENT AMERICANS
BY
Charles Sherwood Farriss
Vice-Pres. of Jno. B. Stetson University
u
Grant this, then man must pass from old to new,
From vain to real, from mistake to fact,
From what once seemed good, to what now proves
first." — Robert Browning.
1920
THE STRATFORD CO., Publishers
Boston, Massachusetts
Copyright 1920
The STRATFORD CO., Publishers
Boston, Mass.
The Alpine Press, Boston, Mass., U. S. A.
A Prefatory Warning
Here honest words of great men gone are spoken, true
To life; but all that might be said is left the nonce
For larger space.
No hardness, sourness, envy, hate-
Is here allowed. If these yon seek, close tight the book.
Invocation
0, God of Lincoln, God of Lee, — oh, lead us, Lord,
Of Washington, and Koosevelt, rare, — oh, guard us
Lord!
The work which Thou hast wrought we beg that Thou
shalt keep
Against an evil day perchance ourselves may bring.
Keep off the storms which counter currents often
raise ;
Fast chain our foolish passion's passing gales within,
Nor let them, raging, move apart the stones just set,
And scatter ruin where now our house so stately
stands.
Oh, let there be no fool's harsh word on land or sea,
Which gathers force ofttimes with good men off their
guard,
And makes them act more foolishly than he who threw
The brand which fired their souls with false and base
alarms.
Oh, let there be no Prejudice, in North or South,
Vile bird that casts its feathered darts from off its
back,
To wound with brazen claws and wings and hideous
beak,
And feed on human flesh while foreign Harpies breed.
"All America is thrown into one mass. Where are
your landmarks — your boundaries of colonies ? They
are all thrown down. The distinctions between Vir-
ginians, Pennsylvanians, New Yorkers and New Eng-
landers, are no more. I am not a Virginian, but an
American." — John Adams' Diary, as quoted by W.
Irving, giving extract from speech of Patrick Henry,
in the first American Congress,
Table of Contents
PAGE
OUR FIEST PRESIDENT . . . .5
ABRAHAM LINCOLN 27
ROBERT EDWARD LEE . . . . 45
THEODORE ROOSEVELT . . . .69
National Freedom — Indissoluble Union — Moral
and Military Greatness — Virile Americanism.
GEORGE WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON AS A BRITISH LIEUTENANT
Copyrighted by Miley & Son, Lexington, Va.
"The man who, amid the decadence of modern
ages first dared believe that he could inspire degener-
ate nations with courage to rise to the level of
republican virtues, lived for all nations and for all
centuries." — Talleyrand, French Minister of Foreign
Affairs under Bonaparte.
w
'Happy in the confirmation of our independence
and sovereignty, and pleased with the opportunity
afforded the United States of becoming a respectable
nation, I resign with satisfaction the appointment I
accepted with diffidence; a diffidence in my abilities
to accomplish so arduous a task, which, however, was
superseded by a confidence in the rectitude of our
cause, the support of the supreme power of the
Union, and the patronage of heaven." — From
Washington's address before Congress tendering his
resignation as Commanding General.
"Should the States reject this excellent Constitu-
tion, the probability is that opportunity will never be
offered to cancel another in peace; the next will be
drawn in blood." — G. W.
(Traditionally related of him when signing
the Constitution.)
George Washington
TTfE have all had, from our childhood, a p"^"*
VV wonderful report of George Washing-
ton; but it was not equal to the reality. The
stories told of his boyhood are not believed to-
day. Nevertheless, his life reads like a charming
romance. Augustine Washington was thrown
from a carriage in London. On arising, he
looked for the first time into the lovely eyes of
Mary Ball, who afterwards became the mother
of our first President. Who can believe in ac-
cidents ! The young George was himself of a
decidedly romantic turn. From fourteen to
twenty-five he was violently in love many times.
In fact, Washington was never unsuccessful in
anything but courtship. Possibly his lack of
success in these things was only the way the
fates had of guiding him eventually to the door-
step of Martha Dandridge, the young, intelligent
and charming widow of Daniel Parke Custis. At
the time of his marriage he was twenty-seven
years old. He had already gained fame in the Success
in Love
French and Indian wars. The young Colonel
retired from the Army, went to Mount Vernon,
which had fallen into his possession by the death
of Lawrence Washington, his brother. There he
spent his honeymoon. With Lord Fairfax, the
friend of his boyhood, and many gentlemen of
[5]
THE AMERICAN SOUL
the day, he hunted foxes and discussed the glow-
ing questions of the day. He served as a member
of the House of Burgesses, and also had time to
become a diligent and most successful farmer
besides. Those were happy days at Mount Ver-
non. But clouds were gathering. Events soon
took an ominous turn.
ciouds Gather rphe stupidity of the English Ministry and
Parliament of that period is quite incredible in
these later times. The Virginia Assembly had
protested in vain against what is known as the
Stamp Act. This Act required that the Colonists
pay a revenue tax upon "all their commercial
paper, legal documents, pamphlets and news-
papers, ' and affix revenue stamps thereto. In
furtherance of the Act British soldiers took up
their residence at different places at the expense
of the Colonists. In this manner Grenville, the
British Prime Minister, attempted to defray "the
expenses of defending, protecting and securing
the colonies.7 "But," as Mr. Wilson remarks,
"he came near losing them instead. (The Act
was passed in March ; it was not to go into effect
until November; but the Colonists did not keep
them waiting until November for their protests. )
a storm it was the voice of a veritable tempest that
of Protest
presently came over the sea to the ear of the
startled Minister." The year before (1764) the
Virginia House of Burgesses had protested in
advance against such taxation. That protest had
been disregarded. What must be done? To
[6]
GEORGE WASHINGTON
speak against the Act now that it has passed
Parliament, would be nothing short of treason.
Was it possible that the men who had left Eng-
land for their freedom would submit to a measure
that violated their liberties? It was a time for
courageous deliberation, for wise indignation, for
implied dissent of a menacing nature ; but not
of intemperate disobedience. And why not open
opposition? Was there not really a determina-
tion to resist the injustice that had been per-
petrated against America? Yes. Then why not
oppose in so many words ? That was the position Patrick
of Patrick Henry, the new member from Han- Boldness
over. That young lawyer and country store-
keeper, offered resolutions and made a speech
which startled the House of Burgesses and
thrilled the world. The impetuosity and charm
of his eloquence carried the majority with him.
But patriots like Peyton Randolph, Edmund
Pendleton, Robert Carter Nicholas, George
Wythe, and others of the older and more con-
servative members, were alarmed. They feared
that all the fat was being cast into the fire. Some
of them even cried Treason ! Treason ! when
Patrick Henry reached the climax of his defiant
address and recommended that the English King
consider well the fate of Caesar and Charles the
First. "If that be treason, make the most of it!"
he said.
What did Washington do? Let us glance
toward his seat in the House during this excite-
[7]
THE AMERICAN SOUL
More
temperate
than Henry
Stamp Act
Continued
in Principle
ment at Henry's address. It is well to do so.
It has the effect of calming one's nerves. There
he sat in silence, feeling deeply, but with the
calm of the brave soldier, the vision of the seer
and the determination of the patriot. He felt
that Henry was right. But no one was ever
further from intemperate act or thought than
was George Washington. So he was opposed to
the intemperate part of the Henry resolutions
which, had they been adopted, would have
brought a British Army at once to the American
shores. Possibly Jefferson had "Washington in
mind when he looked back on those glowing days
and said. " Although we often wished to have
gone faster, we slackened our pace, that our less
ardent colleagues might keep up with us; and
they, on their part, differing nothing from us in
principle, quickened their gait somewhat beyond
that which their prudence might of itself have
advised." But Washington, while not radical or
precipitate, was convinced that the Stamp Act
could never be enforced, and so wrote to Philip
Dandridge, in London. The Stamp Act was re-
pealed but its principle was repeated. It was
followed, in 1767, with "taxes on glass, paper,
painters' colors and tea imported in the Colonies
with a purpose to pay fixed salaries to the
Crown's officers in the Colonies out of the pro-
ceeds; and the contested ground was all to go
over again." Even Jefferson would not accuse
Washington of being slow of step in the face
[8]
GEORGE WASHINGTON
of a letter which the latter wrote at this time to
that splendid lawyer and statesman, George
Mason. "At a time,' said Washington,
"when our Lordly Masters in Great Britain
will be satisfied with nothing less than the
deprivation of American freedom, it seems
highly necessary that something should be done
to avert the stroke, and maintain the liberty
which we have derived from our ancestors.
That no man should scruple or hesitate for a
moment, to use arms in defence of so valuable
a blessing, on which all the good and evil of life
depends, is clearly my opinion. Yet arms, I
would beg leave to add, should be the last re-
source. "
The first Continental Congress met in Phila- First
delphia in 1774. Peyton Randolph, of Vir- ongress
ginia, was President. Samuel Adams, rough
of speech, adroit, and a natural born rebel,
controlled the Massachusetts delegation. They
had suffered most, with British troops
quartered upon Boston and the port shut up.
The so-called Congress was hardly more than
a meeting of Committees.' from the several
Colonies. Patrick Henry, one of the represent-
atives from Virginia, said that unquestionably
Colonel George Washington was "the greatest
man on the floor." Yet he did not figure as a
leader there, although he was reported as
taking advanced ground in his sentiments
against the gross treatment of Massachusetts'
[9]
THE AMERICAN SOUL
His
Earnestness
Second
Congress
Washington
elected
Commander
The New
General a
Noble Figure
Colony. One striking utterance was: "I will
raise one thousand men, enlist them at my own
expense, and march myself at their head for the
relief of Boston!' If he said that, he was de-
cidedly side by side with Patrick Henry.
The second Continental Congress met at
Philadelphia on the 10th of May, 1775. Omi-
nous events led up to it, There was a great
difference between it and the first Congress —
that only protested — this acted. War had
actually begun. Ethan Allen was at that in-
stant taking possession of Fort Ticonderoga.
16,000 Continentals were in or near Boston.
Washington was present, an out and out rebel,
in his Continental uniform, ready to assist to
the extent of his life and fortune. He was
unanimously elected to take command of the
new army which was waiting for a leader. He
said to Congress, in accepting the commission :
"I beg it may be remembered by every gentle-
man in this room, that I this day declare with
the utmost sincerity I do not think myself equal
to the command I am honored with.' Two
days later he was on his way to take command.
John Adams said of him: " There is something
charming to me in the conduct of Washing-
ton.' Says Woodrow Wilson: "It was an
object lesson in the character of the revolution
to see Washington ride through the Colonies to
take charge of an insurgent army. That noble
figure drew all eyes to it; that mien as if the
[10]
GEORGE WASHINGTON
man were a prince ; that sincere and open coun-
tenance, which every man could see was lighted
by a good conscience ; that cordial ease in
salute, as of a man who felt himself brother to
his friends. There was something about Wash-
ington that quickened the pulses of a crowd at
the same time that it awed them, that drew
cheers which were a sort of voice of worship.
Children desired sight of him, and men felt
lifted after he had passed. It was good to have
such a man ride all the open way from Phila-
delphia to Cambridge, in sight of the people, to
assume command of the people's army. It
gave character to the thoughts of all who saw
him.' Was there ever a finer portraiture, in-
side and outside, than that? It carries us pell-
mell into those exciting days and places us
upon the side-lines to lift our hats and, not
shout but pray, for the man who must, by his
wonderful magnetism, both create and hold
together, for eight bitter years, the army which
struck the blows of freedom and made secure
the future of the world 's greatest republic — a
man whose doings thereafter were the history
of America. Henry Cabot Lodge says of him :
"The people looked upon him, and were con-
fident that this was a man worthy and able to
dare and do all things.' Every step of the
way as he rode to Boston was a part of a great
triumphal entry upon his duties. Bunker Hill
had been fought before he arrived in Boston.
[ii]
THE AMERICAN SOUL
"Did the militia fight?" was his quiet though
pulsating inquiry of the messenger. "Yes!'
"Then the liberties of the country are safe.'
I quote from Mr. Lodge's biography: "Mrs.
John Adams,' he says, "warm-hearted and
clever, wrote to her husband after the general's
arrival: "Dignity, ease and complacency, the
gentleman and the soldier look agreeably
blended in him. Modesty marks every line
and feature of his face. Those lines of Dryden
instantly occurred to me, —
"Mark his majestic fabric! He's a temple!
Sacred by birth, and built by hands divine ;
His soul's the deity that lodges there;
Nor is the pile unworthy of the God.'
Lady, lawyer and surgeon, patriot and tory,
all speak alike, and as they wrote, so New
New England England felt. A slave owner, an aristocrat,
true to ° 7
Washington an(j a churchman, "Washington came to Cam-
bridge to pass over the heads of native generals
to the command of a New England army,
among a democratic people, hard working and
simple in their lives, and dissenters to the back-
bone, who regarded episcopacy as something
little short of papistry and quite equivalent to
toryism. Yet the shout that went up from
soldiers and people on Cambridge Common on
that pleasant July morning came from the
heart and had no jarring note. On the field of
battle and throughout eight years of political
[12]
GEORGE WASHINGTON
strife the men of New England stood by the
great Virginian. "
This dramatic beginning, had a great mul-
titude of more and more dramatic sequences.
Indeed for the six years from Bunker Hill to His life from
now on an
Yorktown Washington's life was an epic made Epic
up of hundreds of startling dramas. I have
not the space to tell of the manner in which he
baffled the English Generals, Howe, Gage, Clin-
ton and Cornwallis — of his occupation of, and
retreat from New York City through New Jer-
sey— of his crossing the Delaware, capturing
Trenton, punishing the British at Princeton —
of his pledging his private fortune for the pay-
ment of his troops — of his defeat of Howe at
Brandywine — of his heroic struggles at Valley
Forge — of his attack on Clinton at Monmouth
Court House — of his exasperation at Eichard
Henry Lee, his grief at Arnold's treason, and
his outwitting and capture of Cornwallis at
Yorktown. These events, as events, have been
familiar to us since childhood ; but their full
significance, as they were experienced by
Washington, we have never felt at their full
value, simply from the fact that no historian
has ever sounded the depths of the great pro-
tagonist who occupied the centre of the stage,
during the whole of those stirring times. He Congress
° ° dilatory m
had won the war at Yorktown; but two full making peace
years passed before peace was finally made by
the dilatory Congress. In the meantime, the
[13]
THE AMERICAN SOUL
most dramatic event of the entire war occurred.
It was nothing less than the direct offer to
Washington of a Kingdom by the army. The
incident is known as Colonel Nicola's proposal
from the fact that he was the writer of the
letter to Washington. The main cause of the
proposal was the unpopularity of the civil gov-
iebukeT^ffer ernment with the soldiers. They desired to
?°o^a^eQh™ overthrow it and place Washington at the head
IlG3iQ OI a U6W x f~}
government 0f a stronger form of government. Today, as
we read of the ingratitude of Congress, which
refused to pay the soldiers, and yield them that
consideration which they deserved, our hearts
grow hot with wrath. But while the great
chieftain was on the side of the soldiers, he was
deeply hurt at their offer. Nothing ever so
stung him. He rebuked them severely in his
reply, and hoped that the country might never
know of the offer which had been made to him.
He was not tempted. What tempted and over-
came Caesar, Cromwell, Napoleon, only gave
pain to Washington. It is true that the coun-
try was full of anarchy ; the government was
reeling like a drunken man ; a pusillanimous,
unpatriotic, jealous even dishonorable Con-
gress was playing politics, forcing the child of
his labors, sacrifices and prayers every day
nearer the brink of the precipice. Nor did he
shrink from the glittering offer from any
thought of unsuccess. By no means. "The
army," says Mr. Lodge, "was the one coherent,
[14]
GEORGE WASHINGTON
active and thoroughly organized body in the
country. There would have been in fact no ?^L^«d5?'s
J opinion oi
serious opposition, probably because there §u^esse
would have been no means of sustaining it.
The absolute feebleness of the general govern-
ment was shown a few weeks later, when a
recently recruited regiment of Pennsylvania
troops mutinied, and obliged Congress to leave
Philadelphia. — This mutiny was put down sud-
denly and effectively by Washington, very wroth
at the insubordination of raw troops who had
neither fought nor suffered. ' I quote again
from Mr. Lodge: "From the surrender of
Yorktown to the day of his retirement from the
Presidency, he worked unceasingly to estab-
lish union and strong government in the
country he had made independent. He accom-
plished this great labor more successfully by
honest and lawful methods than if he had taken
the path of the strong-handed savior of society,
and his work in this field did more for the wel-
fare of his country than all his battles. — To
have refused supreme rule, and then to have
effected in the spirit and under the forms of
free government all and more than the most
brilliant of military chiefs could have achieved
by absolute power, is a glory which belongs to
Washington alone.' All will agree that Mr.
Lodge makes a just estimate of the noble act of
Washington in refusing a crown. Every one, M^- ,Carlyle's
° ° •/ > opinion
with the exception of Thomas Carlyle, would
[15]
THE AMERICAN SOUL
endorse it. But then Mr. Carlyle did not love
America — neither does America love Mr. Car-
lyle. For it is wholly capable of seeing; that
the man who found Emerson barren, could un-
derestimate the man who whipped the English
armies, and failed to grasp the supreme power
when the opportunity presented itself. But
Washington was a man of faith that he had
been directed by Jehovah. "I consider it my
indispensable duty/' he said at the end of his
resignation as General, "to close this last sol-
emn act of my official life by commending the
interests of our dearest country to the protec-
tion of Almighty God, and those who have the
superintendence of them to His holy keeping."
"It was," says Woodrow Wilson, "as if spoken
on the morrow of the day upon which he ac-
cepted his commission : the same diffidence, the
same trust in a power greater and higher than
his own."
in the Washington was twice elected President
President's
Chair without opposition. He served two terms of
four years each. He refused to be elected for
a third term. When he was elected for the
first time he accepted the office only after Ham-
ilton had plead with him that it was his duty.
Governor Johnson, of Maryland had written
him that he could explain to any one else except
him why the country must have him. "To
make any one else President," says Mr. Wilson,
"it seemed to men everywhere, would be like
[16]
GEORGE WASHINGTON
crowning' a subject while the King was by.'
Those two terms of his Presidency were tumult-
uous years. They included the time of the for-
mation of political parties; they embraced the
years of the French Revolution ; it was then
that the battle of the giants on the formation
of a National Bank was fought in Congress ; it
was the time of the whiskey rebellion; it was
the time when we began the claiming of the
empire of the great West. Through it all p^if^n8,8
Washington was as great and righteous and as General
efficient as he was when General. In fact, he
reached the high-water-mark of his career
when he laid his stern hand upon Jefferson's
policy to embroil and embrangle us in a wild
and entangling alliance with France engaged
in a revolution which had no resemblance to
ours. But for the wisdom and firmness of
Washington, Jefferson would have brought
upon us the vengeance of Europe. The last
year of his Presidency was quiet and prosper-
ous. The country again idolized him. Men
who had abused him for preventing an alliance
with France and for signing a treaty with
England grew ashamed of themselves. When
the day came to yield up his office to John
Adams "all eyes were bent upon that great
figure in black velvet.' On his way to the
Capitol the people thronged after him. It was
not the new President, but their beloved Wash-
ington they desired to see. The scene touched
[17]
THE AMERICAN SOUL
him. "No man ever saw him so moved.' As
the tears coursed their way down his cheeks,
the hearts of the people were bent in sorrow.
He went back to Mount Vernon to the country-
life he loved. Unfortunately, this time was
brief. On the 12th of December, 1799, on going
the rounds of his farms, he caught a violent
cold which settled in his throat. By evening of
the next day the end had come. "He was calm
the day through," says Wilson, "as in time of
battle ; knowing what betided, but not fearing
it ; steady, noble, a warrior figure to the last ;
and he died as those who loved him might have
The worm wished to see him die.' When the news sped
his death over the nation the people sobbed with the
deepest grief. The flags and standards of
France were hung with crepe and the flags of
the English fleet were lowered to half-mast.
The report of Talleyrand, the French Foreign
Minister, constitutes one of the finest eulogies
ever made to mortal man : I quote its closing
paragraph: "The man who, amid the decad-
ence of modern ages, first dared believe that
he could inspire degenerate nations with cour-
age to rise to the level of republican virtues,
lived for all nations, and for all centuries ; and
this nation which first saw in the life and suc-
cess of that illustrious man a foreboding of his
destiny, and therein recognized a future to be
realized and duties to be performed, had every
right to class him as a fellow citizen. I there-
[18]
GEORGE WASHINGTON
fore submit to the first consul the following-
decree : "Bonaparte, First Consul of the Re-
public decrees as follows : Article 1. A statue
is to be erected to General Washington.
Article 2. This statue is to be placed in one of
the squares of Paris, to be chosen by the Min-
ister of the Interior, and it shall be his duty to
execute the present decree. "
As we turn away from the tomb of the great
we become reflective. The greatness of Wash-
ington compels us to this. Even in his youth
he was a man of high spirit and just percep-
tions, of great moral as well as physical
courage. He always acted in accordance with
his sense of justice. A case in point was when
Governor Dinwiddie raised ten companies with
as many independent captains, and ruled that
there should be no officer above the rank of
Captain. As Washington was already Colonel,
the act was considered demeaning by him and
he went back to his farm at Mount Vernon.
The Governor was surprised, (and Thomas
Penn was concerned that Colonel Washington's
conduct was so imprudent.) With this sort of £ ™an °f. .
behavior in mind, how can you account for the
fact that he always impressed those who knew
him best as having a great restraint and self-
command? His intimate friends knew him as
a man whom they had never seen in a passion.
Yet, we know there were stories of outbursts
against cowardice in the army, disobedience
[19]
THE AMERICAN SOUL
and neglect on the part of overseers, and theft
from trespassers. We have all heard the story
of the poacher who was shooting wild-fowl on
Washington's game preserves. The villain, as
Washington approached him to scold him,
levelled his gun upon him. The act aroused
the fighting spirit of the man who loved the
whistle of bullets. He plunged his horse into
the water, snatched the gun from the hands of
the rogue and thrashed him. This was the
Washington who made it lively for the cowardly
The old-time soldier or even the disobedient general. That
Gentleman °
other Washington, the silent, wholesome, open-
minded, red-blooded product of the polite
training of Lord Fairfax, Greenway Court and
Mount Vernon — the Washington of that mar-
velous self-poise — the Washington who, when
others were rending their garments and casting
the dust into the air stood calm amid the storm,
self-reflective and far-visioned — the Washing-
ton who could pilot a revolution when the
storms of passion which swept across his soul
pressed down upon that lake of fire in his own
breast and compelled its calm — the Washington
who could repress his feelings when an incom-
petent Congress expected everything of him
and his ragged, starving army and yet did
nothing for them in the way of sending sup-
plies— the Washington who could kneel in the
snow at Valley Forge, amid the bloody foot-
prints of a shoeless soldiery and confidently
[20]
GEORGE WASHINGTON
expect great things of the God of battles — the
Washington who could almost bankrupt his
large estate that he might serve his country —
the Washington who could wait for time and
events to disprove the accusations of the
Conway-Gates Conspiracy against him — the
Washington who could, by that great, quiet,
presence of his, allay the fiery antagonisms of
rival statesmen — the Washington who could steering a
° Revolution
successfully steer a revolution, shape a Consti-
tution and lay down his task at the close with
gratitude to God and as much revered by his
fellow citizens as was Solon by the Athenians —
the Washington who far surpassed in his states-
manship any of his critics or admirers — the
Washington whom Napoleon regarded as one
of the greatest generals of History — this was
the Washington (let me say it calmly) the
serene, unruffled, urbane, quiet spirit whose
presence gave him precedence over all, and
whose unsullied character, pre-eminent abil-
ities, modesty, masterful self-control, and yet
withal, Olympian reserve power, were simply
overwhelming.
We have had no man in American history by Himself
like unto him — no man comparable to him in all
things, though others equalled him — even ex-
celled him — in some things. At this late day
we view him with a passionless gaze, and weigh
his qualities with unfevered mind. Wisei
writers of history are in no danger of con-
[21]
THE AMERICAN SOUL
tributing an error of judgment to our Annals
by failure to place him first in time and first in
Present greatness of the American Presidents. We
vitality
need not wonder that he is the livest man in
America to-day and that the interpretation of
his advice against entangling alliances with
European governments has been the storm-
center of the greatest debate in the session of
the Congress just closed and re-convened.
[22 J
ABRAHAM LINCOLN
ABRAHAM LINCOLN
Copyrighted by Harris & Ewing, Washington, D, C,
((•
'He stood a heroic figure, in the centre of a heroic
epoch. He is the true story of the American people
in his time." — Ralph Waldo Emerson.
"If I could save the Union without freeing any
slave, I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing
all the slaves, I would do it; and if I could save it by
freeing some and leaving others alone, I would also
do that." — Abraham Lincoln, in a letter to Horace
Greeley in 1862, as quoted by Congressman Joseph G.
Cannon.
"And then, from fifty fameless years
In quiet Illinois was sent
A word that still the Atlantic hears,
And Lincoln was the Lord of his event."
■ — Drinkwater's Play.
Abraham Lincoln
a
N
OW he is with the ages, said Stanton Lincoln"1
in the gray dawn of the winter day as
the stertorous breathing ceased, and the great
heart was stilled,' said Henry Watterson, the
greatest of editors and one of the greatest of
statesmen, of Abraham Lincoln, in The Cos-
mopolitan ten years ago. "His life" continues
Mr. Watterson, "had been an epic in homespun,
his death, like that of Caesar, beggars the arts
and resources of Melpomene of the mimic
scene."
Why does the great Southerner give such a a South-
erner's
tribute to the leader of the forces against Justice
which he fought in the Civil War? Mr. Wat-
terson answers this question himself. He says :
"With respect to Abraham Lincoln, I, as a
Southern man and Confederate soldier, here
render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's,
even as I would render unto God the things
that are God's."
Does not the great editor tell us the truth
when he suggests that facts of history are all
invalided in the presence of that terrible
tragedy? Must we not indeed have to go to
fiction for a parallel of that tragedy of
tragedies for the people of America, especially
[27]
THE AMERICAN SOUL
A fateful
Night
What the
Crime meant
in the North
of that part of America South of the Potomac
and Ohio rivers? Says John Hay, in speaking
of that scene: "Within the narrow compass of
that stage-box that night were five human be-
ings : the most illustrious of modern heroes
crowned with the most stupendous victory of
modern times; his beloved wife, proud and
happy; two betrothed lovers with all the
promise of felicity that youth, social position,
and wealth could give them, and a young actor,
handsome as Endymion upon Latmus, the idol
of his little world. The glitter of fame, happi-
ness and ease was upon the entire group ; but
in an instant everything was to be changed
with the blinding swiftness of enchantment.
Quick death was to come on the central figure
of that company. Over all the rest the black-
est fates hovered menacingly : fates from
which a mother might pray that kindly death
might save her children in infancy. One was
to wander with the stain of murder on his soul,
with the curses of a world upon his name, with
a price set upon his head, in frightful physical
pain, till he died a dog's death in a burning
barn. The stricken wife was to pass the rest
of her days in melancholy and madness ; of
those two young lovers, one was to slay the
other, and then end his life a raving maniac."
Those are dramatic words of Mr. Lincoln's
private secretary. What did this assassination
mean for the victorious North? A rekindling
[28]
ABRAHAM LINCOLN
of passion in the breasts of some men who had
quenched those fires and longed for a reunion
of the brothers ; a confirmation of the hatreds
of the shallow whose existence depended upon
gorgets of vengeance and morsels of further
human suffering; a redoubling of energies on
the part of the great and the wise to keep alive
the great spirit of the martyr-President now
separated from its human temple. That is
what it meant in the North. What did the
whistle of that criminal bullet mean for the
South? Project yourself into that desolate
section, in those exciting times. What do we
see there ? The South sits at her window in the Wha* it
meant in the
elegant, tattered finery of pre-war days, South
manually helpless from never having had to do
her own labor — her hands yet white and deli-
cate because toilless. As she gazes from her
window, now unglazed by the shock of war,
she is widowed and childless ; her lands are un-
planted ; her live-stock have been slain or
confiscated ; her houses and factories are
ruined, many of them have been burned ; her
storehouses have been ransacked by friend and
foe alike ; her slaves have become voters and
legislators and thousands have followed in the
wake of the invading army. Cropless, labor-
less, moneyless, comfortless, wan and weak,
tired and tearful, haggard and heroic she
reaches out her hand for help. Only one man Only one
i ^t • • -. n . Marl
in the Nation, again under one nag, can give it
[29]
THE AMERICAN SOUL
to her. That man had said to her, on a noted
occasion, that she "should come back home and
behave" herself. He was a man of great heart
and great common sense. He was a man "of
admirable intellectual aplomb/ He was a
man who had the warmth of the Southern sun
in his blood. "He sprang from a Virginia
pedigree and was born in Kentucky.' This
was the man to whom the South, in her
widowed, helpless condition, was looking for
help. This was the man who said to the
people: "I have no prejudice against the
Southern people. They are just what we
would be in their situation.' That was the
man who said to one of his own War-
Congresses: "The people of the South are not
more responsible for the original introduction
of this property than are the people of the
North, and, when it is remembered how unhesi-
tatingly we all use cotton and sugar and share
the profits of dealing in them, it may not be
quite safe to say that the South has been more
responsible than the North for its continu-
ance.' As the worn and still bleeding South
tottered to her feet and held out her hands
toward this her former lover, there was sad
appeal in her eyes and hopefulness in her heart.
And why? She knew his noble nature and her
intuitions told her that he could never, would
never, forget his first love. But alas ! alas ! in
[30]
ABRAHAM LINCOLN
a moment of her radiant hope came the news
that a madman's bullet had sung the requiem
of the great head of the nation.
It is true that some diseases are most danger-
ous at the moment of convalescence — when one
thinks himself well then is he nearest death.
The saying of Solon, the Athenian sage, so
potent in the life of the rich Croesus, has stood
the test of the ages, that is, that no man can be
properly estimated during his life-time. The
world lost heavily in the taking away of Abra-
ham Lincoln. The chaplet it has placed on his
temples is a noble one. The North thought
when he fell, that the grief was hers and only
hers. It was the inspired lute of her own Walt
Whitman which sang her mournful but sweet
lamentation :
0 Captain! my Captain! our fearful trip is My captain
done,
The ship has weather 'd every rack, the prize
we sought is won,
The port is near, the bells I hear, the people
all exulting
While follow eyes the steady Keel, the vessel
grim and daring ;
But 0 heart ! heart ! heart !
0 the bleeding drops of red,
Where on the deck my Captain lies,
Fallen, cold and dead.
[31]
THE AMERICAN SOUL
0 Captain! my Captain! rise up and hear the
bells
Rise up — for you the flag is flung — for you the
bugle trills ;
For you the bouquets and ribboned wreaths —
for you the shores a-crowding,
For you they call, the swaying mass, their
eager faces turning ;
Here Captain ! dear father !
This arm beneath your head !
It is some dream that on the deck,
You've fallen cold and dead.
My Captain does not answer, his lips are pale
and still,
My father does not feel my arm, he has no
pulse nor will,
The ship is anchor 'd safe and sound, its voyage
closed and done.
From fearful trip the victor ship comes in
with object won.
Exult 0 Shores, and ring 0 bells !
But I with mournful tread,
"Walk the deck my Captain lies,
Fallen cold and dead.
what makes This poem was published in the fiery, excit-
Great ing and bitter days of 1865, immediately suc-
ceeding the murder. Do you not notice its
chief glory? Is it in its swinging rythmic
metre and beauteous expression that real
[32]
ABRAHAM LINCOLN
Americans have cause for congratulation and
thankfulness? Yes, but these do not constitute
its highest excellence. What does? Is it in
the fact that it is one of the purest and sweetest
poems Whitman ever wrote? Yes, this criti-
cism is also true ; but it contains far more than
this for all large-spirited men and women of
our great country. What is it, indeed? It is
that though sung in those days of burning an-
ger and misunderstanding, there is not a single
word of rancor in it. It is not a Psalm of a song of
Bethlehem
David, but song of Bethlehem — a message of
peace and not of war — the voice of wisdom and
not the product of "the narrow forehead of
the fool": — It is written in the spirit of the
great Lincoln himself ; it is written in the spirit
in which Col. Watterson wrote on the Lincoln
Centenary celebration: "Only a little while and
there will not be a man living who saw service
on either side of that great struggle. Its pas-
sions long ago faded from manly bosoms.
Meanwhile it is required of no one, whichever
flag he served under, that he make renuncia-
tions dishonoring himself. Bach may leave to
posterity the casting of the balance between
antagonistic schools of thought and opposing
camps in action, where in both the essentials
of fidelity and courage were so amply met.
Nor is it the part of wisdom to regret a tale
that is told. The issues that evoked the strife
of sections are dead issues. The conflict which
[33]
THE AMEEICAN SOUL
External
Dangers in
Brothers'
Quarrels
No Wisdom
in Sectional
Prejudice
was thought to be irreconcilable and was cer-
tainly inevitable, ended more than forty years
ago. It was fought to its conclusion by fear-
less and upright men. To some the result was
logical ; to others it was disappointing ; to all it
was final.' What have we to add to these
manly words of Henry Watterson ? Just this :
that aliens who quarrel should be reconciled,
brothers who quarrel must. The brother who
shuts himself in his room and makes his door
the dead-line between himself and his brother
not merely shuts off all love and progress, but
exposes his premises to exploitation and attack.
Americanization has lately4, been writ large
upon our American skies. Its proper interpre-
tation and the solution of its problems are
bound up in one word — a George Washington
word, an Abraham Lincoln word — the word
union — not only Constitutional union but per-
sonal union. There is absolutely no justifica-
tion for sectional prejudice. Eventually it
must lead, if not to presumption and insult,
possibly attack from outsiders, at least to a re-
newal of civil strife. When could such a thing
take place? Just so soon as the issue at vari-
ance becomes large enough. Could we ever
have so great a question in America? When
New England first sold her slaves to Southern
cotton and sugar planters, who then foresaw
that the question of African slavery had al-
ready been decided against by the fates? But,
[34]
ABRAHAM LINCOLN
as a matter of fact, great issues are not needed
for the unleashing of the dogs of war. Small
questions — worthless questions — are frequently
the occasions (not the causes) of war. Note
the Serajavo incident — the destruction of the
Maine — the firing on Sumter. We all know
that the murder of the Grand Duke of Austria
and his family, in Serbia, was only the occasion
of the late world war; the blowing up of the
battleship, Maine, was not the cause of our war
with Cuba; the firing on Sumter by a battery
of Confederates in Charleston was not the
cause of our Civil War. Germany \s desire to
expand; the United States' desire to relieve its
neighbor of Spanish tyranny and oppression ;
the abrogation of African Slavery were the
causes, but not the occasions of the respect-
ive wars named. Issues become greatly
exaggerated when prejudices run high or com-
mercial necessities require. Whenever the when ciyii
x War would
material wealth and population of the two sec- be possible
in America
tions of our country become nearly if not quite
equally balanced, then sectional prejudices, if
prevalent, shall cause the hairy, bloody crest
of civil war to again become erect. How is this
possible? By the continued development of
the South at its present rate of material prog-
ress ; by the turning of immigration southward ;
or by a realignment of sectional lines by means
of portions of the great West, the new West,
the post bellum part of the nation, becoming
[35]
THE AMERICAN SOUL
sympathetic commercially, with the new South.
Is there any real danger of this to-day? I do
not so believe. We may thank God for the
growth of the anti-sectional spirit in our coun-
try. I am sure there is no real manly American
in the South who would advocate war against
the North even if it were revealed to him by
the fates, or otherwise, that the South would
eventually win? And why? There are two
reasons : The first is, that the spirit of Washing-
ton and Lincoln is too strongly vital in the
Sectionalism hearts of Southern men and women. The sec-
a losing
game on(j is that the section of the country which
would seek its empire would seek its own ruin
eventually. This has been the history of all
States seeking monopoly of government.
"Hardwick declares," says David Starr Jordan
in his Human Harvest, "that war is essential
to the life of a nation ; war strengthens a nation
morally, mentally and physically. ' Such
statements as these set all history at defiance.
War can only waste and corrupt. "All war is
bad, some only worse than others.' "War has
its origin in the evil passions of men, ' ' and even
when unavoidable or righteous its effects are
most baleful. The final effect of each strife for
empire has been the degradation or extinction
of the nation which led in the struggle.' Good
and true words ! What is true of nations is
true of sections. It is consequently the duty of
every manly American to fight sectionalism in
[36]
ABRAHAM LINCOLN
the true Lincolnian spirit. What is that spirit ?
Let me put it in this way : There is a word
which binds into one bundle — one multiple —
all the nature and life and work of Abraham
Lincoln. In that word was pictured, as the sun The word
. . -i'i «t li pi ''Union''
is pictured in the ram-drop, the glory or the
American government and people. It is the
word Union. Do you see what I mean? In
union there is strength ; in disunion there is
weakness. In union there is progress ; in dis-
union there is retrogression. In union there is
independence ; in disunion there is dependence.
In union there is self-respect ; in disunion there
is humiliation and insult. In union there is
freedom; in disunion there is slavery. The
word became so strong a force in his life that
it predominated him. " Stevens/ said he to ^n?™™t[c
the Vice-President of the Southern Confeder-
acy, in that famous meeting to settle differences
and end the war, "let me write ' Union' at the
top of the page and you may write under it
whatever you choose.' In the presence of
those noble words, has the fire-eater and dema-
gogical politician, North or South, who battens
upon sectional prejudices, any real place on
American soil? I do not think so. Let us add
these words from his second inaugural. They
are bright from the furnace and will never
lose their lustre so long as the facade of the
temple of American freedom — which means the
union of its re-united people — looks out upon
[37]
Incident
THE AMERICAN SOUL
A Coronet
of Freedom
Prosperous
Sisters
the rest of the world with a spotless purity!
"With malice toward none; with charity for
all; with firmness in the right, as God gives us
to see the right let us strive on to finish the
work we are in ; to bind up the nation's wounds,
to care for him who shall have borne the battle,
and for his widow and his orphan; to do all
which may achieve and cherish a just and last-
ing peace among ourselves and with all na-
tions/ What jewel is the most valuable and
sparkling by far of the jewels which make up
this wonderful passage — a real coronet of
American freedom and safety and wisdom? It
is this: "to do all which may achieve and cher-
ish a just and lasting peace among ourselves."
Let us for a moment again turn our eyes
upon the South. She again sits at her window,
but no longer with pensive, wan and wasted
weeping. She is no longer in tatters and want.
She looks out upon a landscape of snow,
strangely intermingled with silver and gold.
The snow is her cotton — a great depth of
it ; the silver and gold are her Indian corn
and her wheat — exhaustless veins of them.
In the near background may be seen,
suspended over her growing cities (black when
first ejected from massive stacks, but empur-
pled by contact with the golden Southern sun)
the haze of smoke indicative of a phenomenal
growth of her manufactures and commerce.
As the South looks upon this scene she smiles
[38]
ABRAHAM LINCOLN
radiantly, and points it out to her former rival,
but now warm sympathizer — in fact they are
more closely united than ever before. Their
children have intermarried ; they have stood
together on the same battlefields ; the sons of
the South have gone to the North; the sons of
the North have come to the South ; homes have
become interchanged ; the Northern merchant
or manufacturer has become the Southern land-
owner; the Southern land-owner has become
the Northern merchant or manufacturer ; a new
generation has been the product of this union —
a real American union — disrupted on the ques-
tion of African slavery by war because neither
South nor North would listen, at the moment of
crisis, to the words of Abraham Lincoln. The
two sisters turn and grasp each other by both
hands, gaze kindly each into the eyes of the
other while the spirit of the martyred President
once villified by both, but now loved by both,
looming large in their visualization says, "Love
ye each other and all shall be right with the
world."
[39]
ROBERT EDWARD LEE
ROBERT E. LEE
Copyrighted by Miley & Son, Lexington, Va.
"In him all that was pure and lofty in mind and
purpose found lodgment. He came nearer the ideal
of a soldier and Christian general than any man we
can think of, for he was a greater soldier than Have-
lock, and equally as devout a Christian." — Extract
from editorial in The New York Herald.
"I have met with many of the great men of my
time, but Lee alone impressed me with the feeling
that I was in the presence of a man who was cast in
a grander mould and made of different and finer
metal than all other men.
— Lord Wolseley, British General.
"The Commanding General earnestly exhorts the
troops to abstain with most scrupulous care from
unnecessary or wanton injury to private property;
and he enjoins upon all officers to arrest and bring
to summary punishment all who shall in any way
offend against the orders on this subject." — General
Orders 73, Chamber sburg , Pa., June 27, 1863.
Page 68
I
Robert Edward Lee
N one of the many rooms of " Stratford, ' Robert
.... E. Lee
the famous Lee homestead, in Virginia, on
January 19th, 1807, the eyes of Robert Edward
Lee first opened upon the world to which he
was to add the lustre of a great genius and the
halo of an almost faultless personal life. Had
his great mother, Anne Hill Carter Lee, as she
clasped the babe to her bosom on that winter's
day, visualized his great and fateful career,
her heart would have trembled while it swelled
with a pardonable pride. His mother con-
tributed to his greatness not only the blood of
Robert the Bruce, which coursed in her veins,
but the rarest and finest instruction. His
ideals were of the noblest. Three lives envel-
oped him and moulded the man from material
without dross: Jesus Christ, his mother and
George Washington. This constituted him a
man without offence, of great personal purity,
and of a noble dignity. He was so regarded as
a youth, as a Cadet at West Point (from which
he graduated in 1829 with high honor), in the
Mexican War, where he attained distinction,
and throughout the Civil War. No American
was so like Washington as was Robert E. Lee.
They were both men of great physical comeli-
[45]
THE AMERICAN SOUL
ness and masterful presence. Had they lived
in the days of the finest sculptured marbles,
perpetuant of ideals of Olympian Zeus,
both would have been sought out by Pheidias.
They were both men of the greatest military
genius, the loftiest honor, the most distin-
guished truthfulness, the noblest courage and
the most marvellous self-command under any
circumstances which might arise.
There is no need of going back of June 1,
1862, to estimate the active career of General
Lee. Up to that time he had but little prestige.
Great The greatest soldier of the war had his hands
Military &
Talents tied during the previous year and two months,
Not Known ° r- t **
by President Davis. The judgment of the lat-
ter, in keeping the peerless fighter in a merely
advisory and general service, was unfortunate
for the South. The Federal bullet that tem-
porarily took Joseph E. Johnston from the
field, took away a brave man ; but it performed
the greatest service of the war to the Confed-
erates, by leaving Mr. Davis in great need of
a commander-in-chief. Lee was the logical
choice. Indeed, it was almost a Hobson's
choice, on the part of Jefferson Davis, who was
himself sometimes on the battlefield (in stove-
pipe hat.)
New Activity From the moment Lee had taken his bear-
ings, the high-spirited generals under him felt
the reins tighten. It was the driving of Apollo
instead of Phaethon, and the fierce-mettled
[46]
ROBERT E. LEE
steeds got back into their course. The officers
of the line, inclined to criticise the act that
placed a tame staff official over "soldiers", soon
had the ennui driven from their lives. Ag-
gression was the key-note of Lee. Gaines' Mill
and Malvern Hill, the first great successes of
the new commander, commensurate with his
first opportunity, witnessed a brilliant defeat
of a brilliant soldier, George B. McClellan, and
relieved Richmond, for three years, of what ?eHe™dnd
appeared certain capitulation. The fact that
Lee went to the attack in the face of the advice
of his generals at that time, showed his self-
reliance, and the victory over a great army,
showed the wisdom of his plans. His great
losses, in those seven days' fighting around
Richmond, was not due to any error of his.
"However it was," says Thomas Nelson Page,
"Lee relieved Richmond, and the war, from
being based on a single campaign, was now a
matter of years and treasure, and the years
and the treasure that it required were mainly
due to Lee's transcendant genius. It is prob-
able that but for Lee the war would not have
lasted two years."
The disastrous defeat of Pope at the second
battle of Manassas, within six weeks further,
established Lee's reputation as a master of
strategy and attracted general attention to the
wonderful fighting qualities of "Stonewall stonewall
Jackson". E. Benjamin Andrews, a northern rising star
[47]
THE AMERICAN SOUL
Suggests
Proposition
for
Independence
Fatality of
a handful
of cigars
critic, says of Jackson that he was not only an
intensely religious man but also a stern dis-
ciplinarian. "In consequence, when the day
of battle came, there was not a man in the corps
who did not feel sure that if he shirked dutv
Stonewall Jackson would shoot him and God
Almighty would damn him. This helped to
render Jackson's thirty thousand perhaps the
most efficient fighting machine which had ap-
peared upon the battlefield since the Ironsides
of Oliver Cromwell.' One feels this last
statement to be true, and, it being true, General
Lee was peculiarly fortunate in having such a
lieutenant. After the second Manassas, "Lee's
boldest and possibly the most masterly piece of
strategy in the whole war, and one of the most
daring movements in the history of wars," Lee
wrote to President Davis that the Confederate
States could propose with propriety, to the
United States, the recognition of the South 's
independence. It was partly for this purpose
he entered Maryland, hoping the people of that
State would declare for the South and thus
strengthen the chances for peace. But Mary-
land remained neutral. Unfortunately for the
cause of the South, also, Lee's plan for the cap-
ture of McClellan's army and the eventual cap-
ture of Washington was found wrapped around
a small bundle of cigars carelessly lost by some
Confederate official, on the site of D. H. Hill's
encampment at Frederick. Notwithstanding,
[48]
ROBERT E. LEE
he did not recross the Potomac until he had
captured Harper's Ferry with 12,500 prisoners,
and had, at Antietam, the most sanguinary bat-
tle of the war, withstood successfully the
splendid fighting troops of McClellan 's large
army. His challenge for a fight the next day
after the battle, not being accepted, he crossed
to the Southern side of the Potomac. It was
immediately after Antietam that Lee sent
Stuart for the second time, entirely around the
Army of McClellan — a distance of 126 miles,
with 1800 men, — one of the most brilliant cav-
alry actions in history. He had no losses.
Although the accidental finding of Lee's Military
° ° Fame
despatch made Lee's invasion of Maryland a increased
failure, generally speaking, what he accom-
plished there with only 35,000 badly equipped
troops opposed by the finely furnished 87,000
troops of McClellan, added greatly to his mili-
tary fame. The campaign was one of the most
daring in all warfare. The world suddenly, by
this act, and the seven days of earlier fighting
about Richmond, awaked to the fact that Lee,
hitherto known as a brilliant tactician of de-
fense, was as aggressive as Hannibal and as
daring as Alexander. By mid-December Lee
added the victory of Fredericksburg, a defen-
sive battle, to his military glory. General
Burnside, who had superseded General McClel-
lan, sacrificed on that terrible altar, 12,653 as
brave men as ever fought, and the equally
[49]
THE AMERICAN SOUL
brave Confederate army lost 5,322. The world
run anew with praises of Lee. Many thought
the war won. But Lee was sad. He greatly
desired peace, and hoped that the North would
grant both that and independence for the
Christmas South. Writing, to his wife on Christmas, im-
Letter °7
mediately succeeding his victory, he said: "I
will commence this holy day by writing to you.
My heart is filled with gratitude to God for the
unspeakable mercies with which He has blessed
us in this day; for those He has granted us
from the beginning of life, and particularly
those He has vouchsafed us during the past
year. What should become of us without His
crowning help and protection? Oh! if our
people would only recognize it and cease from
vain self-boasting and adulation, how strong
would be my belief in final success and happi-
ness to our country But what a cruel thing is
war to separate and destroy families and
friends, and mar the purest joys and happiness
God has granted us in this world, to fill our
hearts with hatred instead of love for our neigh-
bors, and to devastate the fair face of this
beautiful world ! ' '
I think we may all say with Thomas Nelson
Page, who quotes this letter in his Life of Lee :
"Should the portrait of a victorious general be
drawn, I know no better example than this
simple outline of a Christian soldier drawn out
of his heart that Christmas morning in his tent,
[50]
ROBERT E. LEE
while the world rang with his victory two
weeks before. It is a portrait of which the
South may well be proud/ I should like to
amend this by adding that it is a protrait of
which every broad-spirited, red-blooded Amer-
ican may well be proud.
Two months and a little more and Lee Chancei-
lorsville
had added the most brilliant to his string of
victories — Chancellorsville. The plan of bat-
tle, on the part of Lee, was audacity itself.
Ten thousand troops he kept himself to watch
the "fighting Joe". Twenty-five thousand he
sent with Jackson in command, to encircle
Hooker's far flung right and destroy it. This
was done most effectually, and General
Hooker's noble army escaped entire destruc-
tion, as most military critics say, by the acci-
dental, mortal wounding of Stonewall Jackson
by his own troops. It was a battle in which
the bravest troops on both sides fought for
every inch of ground ; it was the successful is-
sue of an audacious attempt of Lee against
an army of fine fighters, outnumbering his
own army two to one ; it was a victory which
placed Lee among the world's great military
tacticians and daring commanders and which
set the tongues of people wagging in every
capital in Europe. But withal, it was almost A Pyrrhic
. . ' Victory
a Pyrrhic victory, for in Jackson's fall that
was lost which could not be replaced. The eyes
which "burnt with a brilliant glow" in battle,
[51]
THE AMERICAN SOUL
Distress
over
Jackson's
Loss
Greatness of
one man not
wholly
dependent
upon another
were forever closed, and Lee regarded it as one
of the blackest and most unfortunate days of
his life. With the tenderness of a woman he
was caring for the wounded of both armies in
Chancellorsville, when he received the news of
Jackson's mishap. "I should have chosen/
wrote Lee to his wounded General, . "for the
good of the country, to be disabled in your
stead.' Lee, in announcing the death of Jack-
son to the army, May 11, 1863, said: "While
we mourn his death we feel that his spirit still
lives, and will inspire the whole army with his
indomitable courage, and unshaken confidence
in God as our hope and strength."
To his wife and son he poured out his heart :
"It is a terrible loss" said he to his son. "I do
not know how to replace him. Any victory
would be dear at such a cost. But God's will
be done.' To General J. B. Hood, a week or
more afterward he wrote: "I grieve much over
the death of General Jackson. For our sakes,
not for his. He is happy and at peace. But
his spirit lives with us. I hope it will raise up
many Jacksons in our ranks.'
It is a mistake to make the greatness of a
really great man rest essentially upon another.
Those historians err who declare that without
McClellan, Grant would have been impossible
as do those who think that Lee lost all when he
lost Stonewall Jackson. What McClellan did
by way of organizing and equipping a great
[52]
ROBERT E. LEE
army can not be left out of consideration when
we estimate the success of Grant, nevertheless,
the latter possessed intrinsically those qualities
of stubbornness and indomitable perseverance
which made him a great general. Precisely
the same thing may be said of Lee and Jackson.
There is no doubting the wonderful executive
talent of the Achillean, swift-moving Jackson,
in what he did for Lee, and there is no doubt
that Lee would have accomplished a more posi-
tive success if Jackson had not been killed, yet
the great military genius of Lee emits its own
deathless flames.
From Culpeper, the day of a successful bat-
tle, on June 9th, in which Stuart's cavalry
defeated rather disastrously that under Stone-
man, Lee wrote to his wife: "The country here
looks very green and pretty, notwithstanding
the ravages of war. What a beautiful world
God in His loving kindness to His creatures has
given us ! What a shame that men endowed
with reason and knowledge of right should
mar His gifts ! ' '
Lee now hoped that by crossing the Potomac Why Lee
he might get provisions and shoes for his army Pennsylvania
and, if he could defeat the Federal army (now
commanded by General Geo. G. Meade, an ac-
complished and gallant officer), the North
might be persuaded to grant peace and inde-
pendence to the Confederate States. This is
evidenced by a long letter written by him to
[53]
THE AMERICAN SOUL
What
Gettysburg
meant to
Him
Takes the
Blame upon
Himself
President Davis at the time. Thus began the
memorable campaign culminating in the battle
of Gettysburg (July 1-3, 1863). What Water-
loo was to Napoleon, Gettysburg was to Lee.
Victor Hugo declared that Napoleon lost
Waterloo because the rains of the previous
night made it impossible to carry out his orders
in reference to his artillery. Many historians
say that Longstreet's failure to obey Lee's or-
ders at Gettysburg kept Lee's army from a
great victory. President E. Benjamin An-
drews, a Union soldier, declares that "had
Stonewall Jackson been still alive and in the
place of either'1 Ewell or Longstreet, "the
issue of the battle would almost to a certainty
have been very different from what it was.'
Let it be known however, that Lee took upon
himself the whole blame with his usual noble
generosity.
A noticeable thing about Lee was that he had
sense enough to keep silent when he was mis-
judged and criticised. Another was that he
had heart enough to take all possible blame
upon himself when it might have been placed
upon weaker men who failed him at critical
moments. And his quality of modesty was
clear, pure and without cant or false light.
His manliness was so great, so vicarious, so
militant that he bore, without complaint, the
sins of others. "So far as has ever been made
apparent, every plan which Lee formed for the
[54]
ROBERT E. LEE
battle of Gettysburg, every order which he
gave, was wise and right," says President An
drews. The latter continues: "In Prussia's
war with Austria in 1866, Von Moltke's plan at
the battle of Sadowa, where he splendidly
triumphed, was in the same respect a close
imitation of Lee's at Gettysburg.' Thomas Judgment
* of the
Nelson Page, in his Life of Lee, thinks that Future
"the judgment of the future is likely to be,
that while on the Northern side the corps com-
manders made amends for lack of plan and
saved the day by their admirable co-operation,
on the Southern side the plan of the command-
ing general was defeated by the failure of the
corps commanders to act promptly and in con-
cert.' There was stinging criticism of Lee in
the South for not winning the battle, as there
was of Meade in the North for his not winning
it and destroying the army of Lee. Meade was
eventually superseded by Grant. Lee stopped
the mouths of his critics by taking the whole
blame and offering to resign.
Military critics will continue to talk of the Great
battle of Gettysburg as long as the printer's art on both sides
lasts. Some will say it was a drawn battle, as
Lee lay for ten days in the face of Meade's army
and then leisurely crossed the Potomac with
4000 prisoners. Whatever the verdict in this
respect, all agree that never in the world's his-
tory was more valorous fighting done on both
sides. General Meade showed himself a noble
[55,]
THE AMERICAN SOUL
Grant's
Avalanche
Terrible
Condition of
Lee's Army
soldier, and if Lee was defeated at Gettysburg,
Meade enjoys a distinction that is his alone.
If Lee was defeated it was in the particular
that he had to recross the Potomac without the
supplies for which he had primarily gone into
Pennsylvania. He went back to Virginia al-
ready exhausted of men and resources. The
blockade tightened. To feed and clothe his
men was a greater problem than to win battles.
In the meantime Grant's ever-increasing
avalanche swept down against those ragged
gray lines threatening to overwhelm them, but
without success. President Davis said to Lee,
who, after Gettysburg, asked for a man of
greater ability to be put in his place: "To ask
me to substitute for you some one, in my judg-
ment, more fit to command or who would pos-
sess more of the confidence of the army, or of
the reflecting men of the country, is to demand
an impossibility.7 The days following, up to
the close of the war, two years thereafter,
showed this to be eminently true. The army
of Northern Virginia kept its confidence in
their leader to the bitter end. Had Hannibal's
troops, somewhat under the same sort of condi-
tions, been so attached to their commander,
Rome would have fallen. In the cold winter of
1864 thousands of Lee's troops were without
blankets, socks or shoes, and often without
food. But the army kept its spirit of cheerful-
ness and devotion to its leader. Again and
[56]
ROBERT E. LEE
again the great Grant, with his brave army,
plunged against that pitifully few and
meagrely clothed force; but without exception
experienced a thud instead of a yielding.
Again and again President Lincoln insisted
that not Richmond, the capital of the Confeder-
acy, but Lee's army, its defender, be made the
objective of the army of the Potomac. But in
vain. The fires which surrounded that Brun-
hilde on the banks of the James could not be
penetrated; for the central "feed' of those
fires was the heart and talents of Lee. North Grant
admired in
and South, the Americans who love Lee never the south
fail to exalt his opponent, General Grant.
They do this because of the great qualities of
Grant, for Lee's front was the school master
that led him to greatness. Had he not pos-
sessed great qualities as a commander his large
army could not have withstood the patched
and mended gray columns of that wonderful,
aggressive tactician. This was seen at the
Wilderness, at Spottsylvania and at Cold Har-
bor. At the former, Lee justified the criticism
of Henderson who said that he was "a pro-
found thinker following the highest principles
of the military art.' There Grant showed the
stuff of which he was made. For, as Rodes
sa}xs, "measured by casualties the advantage
was with the Confederates' (Grant losing 17,-
666 men, the Confederates half that number),
Grant reported that he would fight again. To
[57]
THE AMERICAN SOUL
quote Thomas Nelson Page : i ' He had supreme
self-confidence based on rare courage and rare
ability to command and to fight, and he knew
that he outnumbered Lee more than two to one,
and that in his army were the flower of the
North, men as valorous as ever drew breath.'
Grant also possessed great shrewdness, for in-
stead of either retreating or fighting he rushed
forward his men to Spottsylvania, a position,
which if attained, would make Richmond a
sure prey. But Lee divined his purpose and
outstripped him. At Spottsylvania, Lee's line
was partially broken, and he determined to re-
store it, as it had never been broken before.
Heart-sick At that time having had the indescribable mis-
of eGenerai0S£ fortune of losing his great cavalry leader, J. E.
B. Stuart, he placed himself at the head of the
charging columns. But his men refused to
move forward with their idolized commander
in such hazard. He retired to his point of
observation in the rear and the charge that
restored the line was led by General John B.
Gordon. The loss of General Stuart cut Lee to
the heart, and was almost as great a loss as the
death of Stonewall Jackson. He had been at
West Point with Custis Lee, had been much in
the Lee household, and General Lee loved him
as he did his own son, Custis. He had declared
on the death of Jackson, that he had lost his
right hand ; he lost his left hand when Stuart
was shot from his horse at Spottsylvania.
[58]
Stuart
ROBERT E. LEE
General
Butler
bottled
General Sedgwick, the notable Union com- Sedgewick's
opinion of
mander of the Sixth Corps, of Grant's army, Stuart
said of General Stuart: "He was the best cav-
alry officer ever foaled in America.' Lee, in
announcing Stuart's death to his army said:
"To military capacity of a high order and to
the nobler virtues of the soldier he added the
brighter graces of a pure life, guided and sus-
tained by the Christian's faith and hope.' It
is noticeable that Lee, in estimating men, places
the highest value upon their personal Christian
lives.
After Spottsylvania came Cold Harbor. The
task of keeping from Richmond, Grant's army,
which by this time nearly trebled his own, was
a terrible responsibility for Lee. An added
seriousness of the situation was relieved when
General Butler, with 35,000 new troops, was,
as General Grant himself said, "soon in a bottle
which Beauregard had corked, and with a small
force could hold the cork in place.' Neverthe-
less, 12,000 of those troops escaped and were
added to Grant's legions when he and Lee
faced each other on that terrible field of Cold
Harbor — McClellan's former position. Again
and again Lee's line proved unassailable.
Again and again Grant's inflexible resolution
pushed his brave men into that terrible mael-
strom of death, until finally they refused to move.
It was another Balaclava on a greater scale.
"Cold Harbor,' said General Grant after the
Terrible
Battle of
Cold Harbor
[59 J
THE AMERICAN SOUL
war, ' li is the only battle I ever fought that I
would not fight over again under the circum-
stances.' Was there ever a greater fighter than
the American soldier? Certainly the courage
shown by officers and men of both sides during
that Virginia campaign, has not been surpassed
by any soldiers in any age. The losses of
Grant, in thirty days in that campaign were
enormous in killed and wounded. Lee, while
losing only about one-third as many could less
afford the loss than Grant. I quote again from
President E. Benjamin Andrews. "Gettysburg
convinced Lee that he could toy with the
Potomac army no longer, and this was more
than ever impossible after Grant took com-
mand. This struggle [the Wilderness, Spott-
sylvania, and Cold Harbor] tested both com-
manders' mettle to the utmost. At the end of
the hammering campaign, after losing men
enough to form an army as large as Lee's,
Grant's van was full twice as far from Rich-
mond as McClellan's had been two years be-
fore."
Lee's last But slowly and surely were the intrepid
soldiers of Lee marching toward their last
trenches. As another has said, "bravery in
camp and field and deathless endurance at
home could not take the place of bread.'
Although Petersburg, the key to Richmond,
withstood a siege of ten months, and the iron-
willed, indomitable Grant had lost before those
[60]
ROBERT E. LEE
fiery gates 60,000 more men, other agencies Their terrible
J & defence
contributed irresistibly to the close of the war.
With the fall of Vicksburg everything to the
West of the Mississippi was lost. And so with
Kentucky, Tennessee, Missouri and Louisiana.
Mississippi, Alabama and Georgia having been
cut off by Sherman's march to the sea, the veins
of the Confederacy were opened unto the death.
Add to this the fact that Lee's starving few
were finally outnumbered five to one and yet he
kept that line unbroken, until he laid down his
arms at Appomattox, April 9, 1865. All this
was done in the face of an alert, relentless, well-
fed, well-clothed and brave army led by one of
the world's great commanders whose greatness
bespeaks to friend and foe the greatness of Lee.
"Let us ask critics versed in the history of
war' sayg President Andrews, a brave Union
soldier, "if books! tell of generalship more
complete than this!"
When the two great commanders met in the Two Great
Men meet
McLean parlor, at Appomattox, Va., April 9,
1865, there were polite greetings between the
two. Lee wore his sword. Grant apologized
for not wearing his, saying it had gone off in
the baggage. Terms were soon arranged.
There was no tender of sword on the part of
Lee, nor did Grant require it. By the terms
all men were paroled and officers were allowed
to retain their horses, their baggage and their
side-arms. General Lee was courteous, digni-
[61]
THE AMERICAN SOUL
fied and sad; Grant was considerate, magnan-
imous and calm. When the two men, the
greatest Generals of the two armies, left that
parlor, the war was at an end, so far as they
were concerned. Both were great masters of
military science. But both were men of peace.
It remained for smaller men — men neither
great in war nor in peace — to continue the
prejudices of the war. President Andrew
Johnson, a Southern man, took measures to
have Lee indicted for treason. All real Ameri-
cans, North and South, regret this. But too
much must not be made of it. A well known
fact in human history, that prejudices some-
times control large intellects, had its applica-
Grant tion in the case of President Johnson. General
protests . .
Grant protested against such a violation of the
terms of his surrender. The matter was drop-
ped as wholly untenable in accordance with the
Constitution of the United States. It was a
mistake of the times, when men's blood boiled
anew at the assassination of President Lincoln,
a deed denounced by Lee in the strongest
terms. Another mistake of the times was to
permit this great and fine spirit to go to his
grave without amnesty on the part of the
country he always loved and on the history of
which he cast a brilliance, in the estimation of
the world, which will illumine the pages of all
America's future historians.
[62]
ROBERT E. LEE
For there is justice in history. Prejudice
which hides truth in one age ceases to exist in
succeeding ages, so that whatever it hid is dis-
closed to the view. Just as rains and frosts
corrode and wash away and break away the
laminae of earth and gravel and rock until the
veins of rich gold appear upon the surface, thus
our prejudices clear away before breadth of
spirit and justice until the truth is revealed.
Has not that day come to the American people ?
Their enemies should not be those of their own
household. General Lee led the age in his lack
of prejudice. "I have fought against the peo-
ple of the North" he said to Dr. Pendleton, a
clergyman who was resenting the desire of
Johnson to indict him, "because I believed they
were seeking to wrest from the South its dear-
est rights. But I have never cherished toward
them bitter or vindictive feelings, and have
never seen the day I did not pray for them.'?
That was the spirit of Lee, not only in defeat The Spirit
. of the
but also when flushed with victory. It calls, great leaders
a • • c* /-N against
as does the Appomattox spirit of General Sectionalism
Ulysses S. Grant, for every American to belittle
sectionalism. In any part of our great country
where it may show its head it should be smit-
ten. For why should brothers continue their
quarrels while the alien usurps and destroys
the home ?
It belittles the great to apply to them epithets
of extravagant admiration. No one would feel
[63]
THE AMERICAN SOUL
more hurt by them than would General Lee.
But it is difficult indeed to discover what may
be termed extravagances in reference to him,
although the finest things have been said of
him. At his death the greatest editors, states-
men and soldiers of the world sought to do
honor to his greatness. The New York Herald
said: "In him the military genius of America
was developed to a greater extent than ever
The Christian before. He was a greater soldier than Have-
the world's lock, and equally as devout as a Christian." I
close with the concluding sentence of the com-
mendation by the famous soldier, Lord Wolseley,
of the lamented Lee : "I believe he will not only
be regarded as the most prominent figure of the
Confederacy, but as the greatest American of
the 19th century, whose statue is well worthy
to stand on an equal pedestal with that of
Washington and whose memor}^ is equally
worthy to be enshrined in the hearts of all his
countrymen.
? ?
[64]
THEODORE ROOSEVELT
Political Reformer
THEODORE ROOSEVELT
Copyrighted by Harris & Ewing, Washington, D. C.
"Of illustrious men the whole earth is the sepulchre.
They are immortalized not alone by columns and
inscriptions in their own lands; memorials to them
arise in foreign countries as well — not of stone, it
may be, but unwritten, in the thoughts of posterity."
— Thucydides.
"In my judgment, no man is a good American who
is not, of course, an American first — an American
before he is a member of any section of the American
people such as a party or a class." — Theodore Roose-
velt, in the New Nationalism.
"Take what I mean when I speak of the square
deal. I mean not only that each man should act
fairly and honestly under the rules of the game as it
is now played, but I mean also that if the rules give
improper advantage to some set of people, then let
us change the rules of the game."
— Theodore Roosevelt.
Theodore Roosevelt
1 THEODORE ROOSEVELT was the twenty- Theodore
17 Roosevelt
fifth President of the United States. He was
the first city-born man to reach that great place.
Presidential timber usually grows in the coun-
try and not along the curbs and in the parks of
our cities. Nevertheless his was as sturdy a
growth as those which withstood the cold blasts
of the mountain forests or the sultry heat of
the plantations. Despite the fact that he was
born with a silver spoon in his mouth, he was as
democratic as Abraham Lincoln who was born
in a log-cabin, or Andrew Johnson, the tailor,
or James A. Garfield, the canal-boy, each of the
cradles of whom was almost as lowly as th&t
of the Manger itself. He was as much a self-
made man as any one of those. Why do I say v
this? From the fact that it is as difficult for a
rich young man to overcome temptation to a
life of idleness and ease and train for the hard-
ships that meet the ordinary man in life as it
is for a poor young man to overcome obstacles
which beset his way. How do we know this?
The history of the Presidency is convincing
inductive proof of the fact. Nearly every o#e
of the men who has filled that lofty chair has
come from an humble family. Can you think
[69]
THE AMERICAN SOUL
that such a remarkable fact is an accident? I
do not think so. Neither can you suppose
that no great intellects are born among the rich.
It is much more logical to say that men who are
born rich and who grow up in wealthy circum-
stances, frequently succumb to lives of ease.
Pain is the most dreaded of all disciplin-
arians. But ifhas been the agent of glory not
only for the saint but also for the statesman.
What do I mean by this? I mean that as sick-
ness has often wrenched religious character
into shape for its heavenly place, so has the
strength acquired in overcoming it by many
statesmen been the stepping stone to patriotic
preeminence and popularity. "With them it has
been a third step to heaven (Pelion # * * * ter-
sickiiest tius caelo gradus). Theodore Roosevelt,
of Babies .,,.„.-
strongest of men, was sickliest of babies. For
years he gasped for breath upon the large,
warm heart and in the strong, incubatorial
arms of his father. These literally insulated
the infant from death, carrying the tiny tot
through many long, lonely nights and over
many miles in quest of fresh air. The father
who holds his hardy boy to his heart enfolds a
precious, but not always a prize, package. But
who of us may properly estimate the value to
America of that little bundle held in the arms
of Theodore Roosevelt the elder?
Two Sources Two streams coursed broadly through the
veins of Theodore Roosevelt. One was made
[70]
THEODORE ROOSEVELT
up of fighting blood, rapid, impulsive, tumbling
on its way over all obstacles ; the other was con-
stituted of human sympathies and justice,
serenely flowing onward vitalizing and fructi-
fying everything it touched. What were the
sources of these streams? The fighting blood
came from the mother, the beautiful Martha
Bulloch, great-grand-daughter of Governor
Archibald Bulloch (Georgia's first chief Execu-
tive during the Revolution), and sister of two
Confederate Naval officers — Admiral J. D. Bul-
loch and midshipman Irvine S. Bulloch. The
philanthropic blood came from Theodore
Roosevelt Sr., father of the President, who
spent most of his life in deeds of personal
philanthropy, having retired from business for
that purpose. Do any of you believe in hered-
ity? Do any of you beileve in the saying,
"Blood will tell"? If you do, what do you
think of this lineage of this great man? Do
you not think that the lineage justifies the man
and that the man justifies the lineage? Do
you not believe that this is true, whether you
believe in heredity or not?
Accordingly there were two men under the £w0
0 Roosevelts
physical aspect of Theodore Roosevelt. One
was the genial companion and democratic spirit
which drew men to him everywhere ; this was
the "pard' of the rough and ready cow-boy
who liked him because he always did his part
of the work and held up his end of the log;
[71]
THE AMERICAN SOUL
this was the sympathetic Colonel who shared
the discomforts and dangers of his men and
won their love ; this was the man who gave up
his position as Assistant Secretary of the Navy
to enter the war for the relief of Cuba ; this was
the man who declared, with great meaning, "I
would work as quick beside Pat Dugan as with
the last descendants of the Patroon;" this was
the Lieutenant-Colonel who on the four hot,
dusty days" from Texas to Tampa gave up his
sleeping car berth, which had been provided
for him as an officer, to a sick soldier (it is in-
deed refreshing to know of such a thing as
that in the light of many late happenings among
soldiers) ; this is the officer who bunked with
his men in Tampa instead of taking up com-
The intensely fortable quarters in the hotel (There is reallv
Human "
Roosevelt something of Achillean and Alexanderian
hardiwood, sympathy and sapiency in such an
act) ; this was the soldier who showed his great
courage and presence of mind on the fields of
Las Guasimas and San Juan, leading his troops
and those of others in several famous charges
in which ten per cent of his Rough Riders were
killed or wounded; this is the Colonel who
went among the wounded after Las Guasimas
and said : "Boys, if there is a man at home who
wouldn't be proud to change places with you,
he isn't worth his salt, and he is not a true
American;" this is the Colonel who went
among those wounded boys, carrying them
[72]
THEODORE ROOSEVELT
dainties and sympathy, with such words as
these, " Don't get up boys, lie still. Ah, Jim,
how's your leg feeling to-day? Getting bet-
ter? That's good. You'll soon be all right
now. Billy, I hope your back doesn't trouble
you so much to-day.' (Vide Morgan) — this was
the Roosevelt of whom Joseph Bucklin Bishop,
editor of Theodore Roosevelt 's Letters to his chil-
dren, says : ' ' Deep and abiding love of children,
of family and home, that was the dominating
passion of his life. With that went love for
friends and fellow-men, and for all things,
birds, animals, trees, flowers, and nature in all
its moods and aspects.' What more can or
need be said? Do not these great qualities of
unselfishness, courage, sympathy, thoughtful-
ness, gentleness, simplicity, love of children
and love of home place him among the great
and in the presence and companionship of
Jesus Christ?
It is never safe to use absolute statements
about any person or event It is considered a
trait of intellectual weakness to do this. For
instance, there are those who say that Theodore
Roosevelt was the greatest American. There
is not yet any necessity nor wise desire to go
into a question of that kind. We may, how-
ever, all say that he is one of the greatest of
Americans. I say that not as a republican, but
as a democrat and a Southern-born man. It
has never been difficult to see and feel his great-
[73]
THE AMERICAN SOUL
Loved
America most
Great in the
Home-life
ness. We do not have to hunt for it through
a mass of sectionalism. He loved the South,
for it was the home of his mother. He loved
the North, for it was the home of his father.
But he loved America more than he did any
part of it.
Home is the revealer of the man. Would
you know about Theodore Roosevelt's home-
life? There you shall find the golden key
which unlocks the dearest secrets of the soul of
this man who was such a strenuous fighter for
civic righteousness. In his home "the eternal
child's heart in the man cries out.'1 The great
man there placed himself absolutely on an
equality with wife and children. There he
was a flood of sunshine and a jolly companion,
engaging in romps and rides and games and
pillow-fights, longed for before he came and
missed when he was gone. These things are
richly disclosed in his Letters to His Children.
This volume, by Joseph Bucklin Bishop, I re-
gard as one of the richest legacies left to the
home life in a hundred generations. Shall I
select one of the letters, chosen for its brevity?
It is to little Quentin, and dated Del Monte,
Calif., May 10, 1903: Dearest Quenty-Quee : I
loved your letter. I am very homesick for
mother and you children; but I have enjoyed
this week's travel. I have been among the
orange groves, where the trees have oranges
growing thick upon them, and there are more
[74]
THEODORE ROOSEVELT
flowers than you have ever seen. I have a gold
top which I shall give you if Mother thinks you
can take care of it. Perhaps I shall give you a
silver bell instead. Whenever I see a little
boy being brought up by his father or mother
to look at the procession as we pass by, I think
of you and Archie and feel very homesick.
Sometimes little boys ride in the procession on
their ponies, just like Archie on Algonquin."
Here is a short extract from quite a long letter Extract froi
to his son Kermit, who was in school. It was Kermitr
written from the White House in June, 1905,
and goes into detail about a family picnic at
Pine Knot: "As we found that cleaning dishes
took up an awful time, we only took two meals
a day, which was all we wanted. On Saturday
evening I fried two chickens for dinner, while
Mother boiled the tea [probably meaning
boiled the water for the tea], and we had cher-
ries and wild strawberries, as well as biscuits
and cornbread. To my pleasure Mother great-
ly enjoyed the fried chicken and admitted that
what you children had said of the way I fried
chicken was all true. In the evening we sat
out a long time on the piazza, and then read in-
doors, and then went to bed.' These extracts
tell the spirit of all the letters. There are
many of them. There is no preaching or cross-
ness in any of them.
So much for what would be called the heart-
side of this picturesque personality. What
[75]
THE AMERICAN SOUL
may be said about that other side of him — his
The intellectual side ? Did he have as great a mind
intellectual
side of as heart? Of course his blind worshipers, of
Roosevelt
whom he had thousands, think so. But do
serious minded, thoughtful men and women of
America accord him this judgment? So far as
I have been able to determine, they do. Of
course there are people of violent prejudices
who think it would show weakness in them to
admit the real greatness of Mr. Roosevelt. But
these people are unfortunate in their limita-
tions. While they would have with them some
of respectable lives and good intellects, none of
them might lay claim to broad-mindedness and
fairness. But would that be all? By no
means. They would find among their associ-
ates many who hate the former President on
account of their own unrighteousness, or un-
reasonableness.
a fight for Prom the first day on which Mr. Roosevelt
Righteousness
from the first stepped into the political arena he was opposed
by the unrighteous element of his own party.
This included the bosses, little and big. (He was
never favored by political bosses, except when
they were compelled to do so by his popular-
ity.) In the beginning of his career they
whipped him often ; but sometimes he whipped
them. They whipped him once too often.
That was when Mr. Piatt, the New York Repub-
lican boss, nominated him for the Vice-Presi-
dency in order to spoil his chances of the Presi-
[76]
THEODORE ROOSEVELT
dency. As it eventually turned out, it was a
door to the Presidency, flung open by the death
of President McKinley. But did Mr. Roose-
velt think the bosses wholly bad? Not by any
means. He liked Mr. Piatt, Mr. Hanna and
Mr. Quay, as men. Why did he not join them?
He thought the boss-system encouraged graft
and immorality. Did he not believe that there
should be political leaders and party organi-
zation? He did; but was careful to distinguish
between the leader and what was known as the
boss. Hear him on this question: "A leader is Distinguishing
between a
necessary; but his opponents always call him a Leader and
boss. An organization is always necessary but
the men in opposition always call it a machine.
Nevertheless, there is a real and deep distinc-
tion between the leader and the boss, between
organizations and machines. A political leader
who fights openly for principles and who keeps
his position of leadership by stirring the con-
sciences and convincing the intellects of his fol-
lowers, so that they have confidence in him and
will follow him because they can achieve
greater results under him than under any one
else, is doing work which is indispensable in a
democracy. The boss, on the other hand, is a
man who does not gain his power by open
means, but by secret means and usually by cor-
rupt means. A boss of this kind can pull wires
in conventions, can manipulate members of the
Legislature, can control the giving or withhold-
[ 77 ]
THE AMEEICAN SOUL
ing of office, and serves as intermediary for
bringing together the powers of corrupt politics
and corrupt business. The machine is simply
another name for the kind of organization
which is certain to grow up in a party or a
section of a party controlled by such bosses as
these and their henchmen, whereas, of course,
an effective organization of decent men is essen-
tial in order to secure decent politics.'
when the When did opposition begin against Mr.
Bosses began x x °
to fight him Roosevelt? The opposition began by the bosses
when, aged 23, as a member of the Legislature,
Mr. Roosevelt carried a motion to impeach a
corrupt judge. As first he stood alone. What
was the result? The bosses suppressed the bill,
and decided that he was "no good.' Did they
succeed in defeating him the next year? No,
for that was the year Grover Cleveland swept
the state, as a civil service reformer by 200,000
majority. So strong was Rooesvelt's feeling
for reform that he showed his willingness to
support Governor Cleveland in certain reforms.
It was in the Legislature that Mr. Roosevelt
was first found "impossible' by the machine.
It was in the Legislature that a politician, in
trying to remove Mr. Roosevelt's objections to
a bill, urged him not to "let the Constitution
come between friends.' There he learned his
"first real lesson in politics," to stand alone for
a clear principle, but to work with men as they
First Lesson are until such an emergency comes.' There he
[78]
THEODORE ROOSEVELT
told the people of the "bitter cry of the
crowded sweat shops of the city tenements'
and had a bill passed for their relief. It was
there, as chairman of a Committee he investi-
gated New York City official life, exposed a
great deal of graft, and gave the people of
New York the chance to secure good govern-
ment.
But has it ever been possible for a really
romantic nature to satisfy his soul with the
hubbub of politics? Such at least was not the
case with Mr. Roosevelt, one of the most ro-
mantic of men. Between legislative sessions Answers the
& m Call of the
he answered the call of the wilderness and wild
sought the vast, mysterious silences and hard-
ships of the golden West. His open nature,
kindliness, democratic spirit, and readiness to
do his part, won him the love of the plainsmen.
The exposure to the snows and the hard, open-
air tasks gave him a body of the strength of
steel. When the young legislator left the train
at the shanty-town of Medora, in North Dakota,
the act rendered that spot forever historic.
In 1886, he was recalled to the East to be Recalled to
New York
defeated for mayor of New York by Abram S.
Hewitt ; in 1889, he was appointed on the
National Civil Service Commission. While in
this position he made an address to the corre-
spondents of the Southern press in which he
said: "This is an institution not for Republi-
cans and not for Democrats, but for the whole
[79]
THE AMERICAN SOUL
American people/' In 1895-97, he was Presi-
dent of the New York Police Commission. At
that time the New York police were the most
services as corrupt body of officials in the world. "A man
Police .
Commissioner could not be appointed a policeman until he had
paid from $200 to $300 and to be promoted to
a captaincy cost as high as $12,000 to $15,000.
To get their money back they had to blackmail
the lawless elements of the population.' Did
Mr. Roosevelt stand such corruption? It goes
without saying that he did not. The boldness
and success of his reforms astonished the coun-
try and dumbfounded the bosses. Not only did
he stop the system of paying for promotions,
but required, in new appointments, a "good
primary common school educational test, after
the moral and physical examination was
passed. Some of the answers returned were in-
dicative of several things. "For instance,'
says Mr. Roosevelt, "one of our questions in a
given examination was to name five of the New
England States. One competitor, obviously
of foreign birth, answered: "England, Ireland,
Scotland, Whales and Cork." Many of the ap-
plicants thought Abraham Lincoln a general in
the civil war • several that he was President of
the Confederate States ; three that he had been
assassinated by Jefferson Davis, "one by
Thomas Jefferson, one by Garfield, several by
Guiteau, and one by Ballington Booth;" some
applicants thought Chicago to be on the Pacific
[80]
THEODORE EOOSEVELT
Ocean, while others answered that the head of
the United States Government was the New
York Fire Department.
What was the ultimate outcome? Did he what he did
as Commis-
succeed in overcoming the thousand difficul- sioner
ties of this office? He abolished blackmail;
he created efficiency where there had been in-
efficiency ; he convinced the men of the force
that he believed in a square deal; he enforced
the Sunday Closing law against all saloons; he
enforced the neglected tenement-house law,
and "promptly seized fully one hundred
wretched and crowded hives of the helpless
poor,' diminishing in one locality the death-
rate to less than one-half. A characteristic
scene occurred during a procession of the Ger-
man element to protest against the Sunday
Closing of the saloons. Roosevelt was on the
reviewing stand with other city officials. A
Franco-German veteran in the procession, un-
aware of the Commissioner's proximity,
shouted out as he was passing, "Wo ist der
Roosevelt? (Where is Roosevelt?)' Imagine
his surprise when he saw just above him those
large two eye-glasses and gleaming white
teeth as he heard the answer, "Hier bin ich.
Was willst du, Kamrad?' (Here I am. What
do you wish comrade). "Hoch! Hoch ! Roose-
velt," shouted the old fellow as he hurried
along much chagrined.1
1 Morgan.
[81]
THE AMERICAN SOUL
what was the But what shall we say of the policy of the
"Big Stick"? . J . .
Big Stick? Where did the term originate? It
came from an expression of his attitude in
reference to America defending the Monroe
Doctrine. This expression is, " There is an old
adage which runs, ' Speak softly and carry a
big stick ; you will go far. ' It is a remark-
able fact that Mr. Roosevelt adopted the first
rather than the latter part of the saying in all
his policies. He was in no sense a bully, al-
though the fierce, powerful interests opposed
accomplished D^ nni1 tried to make it appear so. As
a biographer says: "the weapon in his hand
takes the form of a righteous cause, charged
with the irresistible force of public opinion.'
His so-called big stick was not in any sense a
policy of the "shirt sleeve' variety of brag,
and bluster and discourtesy, but the opposite.
It enabled him to secure from the Pope the re-
call of the Spanish Friars from the Philippines;
it enabled him to check the bombardment of
the Venezuelan port by British and German
war vessels in 1903 ; it enabled him in the same
year to deliver the petition of protest to Rus-
sia against outrages on the Jews ; it enabled
him to end the Russian-Japanese War, June 12,
1905. (Mr. Root said of this last that Mr.
Roosevelt held the most important portfolio in
the Cabinet — that of "Secretary of Peace.'
Mr. Root's opinion was justified; for that
service to mankind, Mr. Roosevelt received the
[82]
THEODORE ROOSEVELT
Nobel Peace Prize). It enabled him to send
our fleet around the world, thus redoubling the
respect of the world for the military possibil-
ities of America; it enabled him to build the
Panama Canal.
But from what quarter did the burly and
criminal-looking cartoons come? There is no
doubt that they were a part of a systematized
propaganda to destroy his influence in his own
party. And what was more natural? As
President, Mr. Roosevelt took up the fight
against industrial monopolies. What was the
consequence? He stired up a hornet's nest.
Both enemies and friends, democrats and re-
publicans, admit his masterful fight. " There
have been aristocracies," he says in his Auto-
biography, " which have played a great and
beneficient part at stages in the growth of man-
kind; but we had come to the stage where for
our people what was needed was a real democ-
racy ; and of all forms of tyranny the least £he worst
«/ 7 «/ t/ Tyranny
attractive and the most vulgar is the tyranny
of mere wealth, the tyranny of a plutocracy."
But was Mr. Roosevelt the original mover
against monopoly in our industries? Was not
the Sherman Anti-Trust Law a United States
Law, the purpose of which was "to destroy
monopoly and curb industrial combinations"?
And further, had not the Government, under
President Cleveland, brought suit to prevent
the Sugar Trust from obtaining control of
[83]
letter
THE AMERICAN SOUL
three additional companies in Philadelphia?
Is it not true that one of the purposes of that
suit, known as the Knight case, was to prevent
the Sugar Trust from controlling 98% of all
our sugar production? Those things are all
true. But it is also true that the case had gone
against the Government. The Supreme Court
had held, with only one dissenting vote, that
the Sugar Trust had the right to acquire those
three companies by an exchange of its stock
what made for theirs. Such a decision made the Sherman
the Sherman
Law a dead Anti-Trust law a dead letter. Both the Presi-
dent and Congress were powerless to interfere.
Big trusts rapidly multiplied, free from all
harm under the protection of that decision.
What was Mr. Roosevelt, the President, to do?
Many smaller corporations and industries went
to the wall and others were suffering. A
clamor came up from the people. In the mean-
time, under the name of the Northern Securities
Company, a gigantic attempt was made, under
this Knight case decision, to put into one hold-
ing company the vast Northwestern railway
systems. Mr. Roosevelt leaped into the arena
almost immediately after he became President.
He was at that time even a more picturesque
figure than usual. The "big stick " put in
some of its heaviest blows. He was caricatured
and abused by papers friendly to the ^inter-
ests" from Maine to California; but he was
making history and winning popularity among
[84]
THEODORE ROOSEVELT
the people. He ordered his Attorney-General,
Mr. Knox, to institute proceedings for the dis-
solution of the Securities Company — the rail-
way trust in question. It was done. The
Government lost, because of the Knight case
decision. The big trusts laughed at his dis-
comfiture. But it was dangerous to laugh in ^ K^ghT*
front of those drooping, honest eyes of Roose- Case Decisl0n
velt. He never faced big game with only one
load in his gun. The next time he invaded the
Supreme Court itself and asked a reversal of
the Knight case, "in the interest of the people
against monopoly and privilege.' I remember
that at the time he was regarded as rather
irreverent toward that august body; but he
had the sympathy of the majority of the just
and cool-headed men in America of both politi-
cal parties. He won by a vote of 5 to 4. But *ie wins
x ^ 5 to 4
had he really accomplished his purpose? He
had "established the power of the Government
to deal with all great corporations." But
would this be an efficient enough instrument to
break up monopoly of industries? He did not
think so. What did he do? He sought the es-
tablishment of a Federal Commission which
" should put a stop to abuse of big corporations
and small corporations alike.' Such a Com-
mission "would destroy monopoly, and make
the biggest business man in the country con-
form squarely to the principles laid down by
the American people, while at the same time
[85]
THE AMERICAN SOUL
What
Roosevelt
regarded as
His Greatest
Services
giving fair play to the little man and certainty
of knowledge as to what was wrong and what
was right both to big and little man." He
never succeeded in having such a Commission
created ; but his efforts led to the establishment
of a "Department of Commerce and Labor, and
with it the erection of the Bureau of
Corporations."
Roosevelt left the Presidency in March, 1909,
of all preceding Presidents the most popular
with the people. For seven and a half years he
had stood for civic righteousness. He re-
garded as his most important accomplishments
the construction of the Panama Canal; his in-
tervention for peace between Russia and
Japan; and his sending the fleet around the
world. Mr. LaFollette, a political enemy, said
that none of these compared with other achieve-
ments of the retiring President. Among these
were : the making of reform respectable ; the
doctrine of the square deal; and the conserva-
tion of our national resources. I quote from
LaFollette 's Magazine: "Nothing can be
greater or finer than this. It is so great and so
fine that when the historian of the future shall
speak of Theodore Roosevelt he is likely, to say
that he did many notable things — but that his
greatest work was inspiring and actually be-
ginning a world-movement for staying ter-*
restrial waste and saving for the human race
the things upon which, and upon which alone,
[86]
THEODORE ROOSEVELT
a great and peaceful and progressive and
happy race-life can be founded."
May we say with Mr. Hermann Hagedorn, As a
Statesman
Jr.: "As a statesman his place is among the
greatest America has produced ; but as a man,
he stands with the noblest, most valiant and
most appealing in history. It is not his deeds
but his qualities of character which constitute
the splendor of the heritage he has left us"?
Here is the message written by Mr. Roosevelt
for the New York Bible Society and placed in
Testaments given to our soldiers :
"The teachings of the New Testament are
foreshadowed in Micah's verse: 'What more
doth the Lord require of thee than to do jus-
tice, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly
with thy God.'
Do justice ; and therefore fight valiantly
against the armies of Germany and Turkey, for
these nations in this crisis stand for the reign
of Moloch and Beelzebub in this earth.
Love mercy ; treat prisoners well ; succor the
wounded; treat every woman as if she were
your sister; care for the little children, and be
tender with the old and helpless.
Walk humbly ; you will do so if you study the
life and teachings of the Saviour.
May the God of justice and mercy have you
in His keeping."
What would an honest critic regard as the gis mo^
Outstanding
most outstanding trait of Theodore Roosevelt? Trait
[87]
THE AMERICAN SOUL
Would lie say it was energy? Truly he was a
man of tremendous energy; but that was not
his strongest characteristic. "Was it honesty
of purpose, kindliness, love of home, love of
nature, love of country, manliness, hatred of
evil, love of justice? No. What then was it?
As I see it, it was an almost abnormal devel-
opment of a great consciousness. So wonder-
fully developed was his consciousness that his
constant habit was to regard himself and his
conduct in a wholly impersonal way. We find
him again and again comparing himself with
others whether with a cowboy of the plains, or
Andrew Jackson, a President. He always
gave us an honest judgment of the result,
whether favorable or unfavorable to himself.
Shallow people sometimes thought this to be
egotism. But that idea is absolutely precluded
by the fact that his comparisons were most fre-
quently unfavorable to himself. What advan-
tage was this highly developed consciousness?
It was advantageous in this particular, when-
ever he measured up short he immediately de-
voted his energies to make himself more fit and
thus shorten the distance between himself and
the object of his comparison. This trait man-
ifested itself from childhood, through youth and
middle age. It enabled him to overcome colos-
sal difficulties and gain a permanent place
among the great.
[88]
THE AMERICAN SOUL
If it were left to my choice to call upon our Most
appreciative
Eternal Father to send, in His mercy, from of best
, . Americanism
among the great spirits of our departed states-
men, a bright evangel to go abroad throughout
the earth to herald the advantages to man of
the freedom of worship, freedom of opportun-
ity, and freedom of citizenship, as we have
them here in our beloved America, I would not
ask that Washington or Jackson or Lincoln be
sent, as truly great and as truly American as
were those great spirits; but I should humbly
plead that He send Theodore Roosevelt, who
would have a better acquaintance with modern
American conditions and at the same time
would share equally the great traits of the im-
mortal trio which I have named.
[89]
No. "• -•■ Sect.„_- Shelf
CONTENTS
Lincoln National Life Foundation
Collateral Lincoln Library
1 \.Zool.48*{.£>$c7 \\