Skip to main content

Full text of "Anatomical aspects of avocado stems and their relation to rooting"

See other formats


Anatomical  Aspects  of  Avocado  Stems 
and  T'ineir  Relation  to  Rooting 


By 

RICARDO.E.  GOMEZ 


A  DISSERTATION  PRESENTED  TO  THE  GRADUATE  COUNCIL 
OF  THE  UNIVERSITY  OF  FLORIDA  IN  PARTIAL  FULFILLMENT  OF  TBI 
REQUIREMENTS  FOH  THE  DEGREE  OF  DOCTOR  OF  PHILOSOPHY 


UNIVERSITY  OF  FLOIRDA 
1971 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

The  author  expresses  his  appreciation  to  Drs.  James  Soule  and  Simon 
E.  Malo  for  their  guidance,  assistance  and  interest  during  the  planning 
and  completion  of  this  investigation.  Appreciation  is  also  extended  to 
Drs.  R.  C.  Smith  and  R.  H.  Biggs  for  their  constructive  criticisms  and 
suggestions  in  the  interpretation  and  preparation  of  the  manuscripts,  to 
Drs.  R.  A.  Conover  and  A.  H.  Krezdorn  for  their  support  and  friendly 
guidance. 

Eternal  thanks  are  extended  to  his  wife  for  her  moral  support  and 
the  typing  of  this  manuscript. 

The  author  also  wishes  to  extend  his  appreciation  to  the  Agricultural 
Research  and  Education  Center  Homestead  and  to  the  Center  for  Tropical 
Agriculture  for  providing  financial  assistance  which  made  this  study 
possible. 


ii 


TABLE  OF  CONTENTS 

Page 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS  ii 

LIST  OF  TABLES  . , iv 

LIST  OF  FIGURES  v 

ABSTRACT  vil 

INTRODUCTION 1 

LITERATURE  REVIEW  2 

MATERLALS  ANT)  METHODS 6 

Air  Layers  6 

Anatomical  Studies  6 

RESULTS  AND  DISCUSSION  8 

Air  Layers  8 

Anatomical  Studies  lU 

General  Stem  Anatomy  Ik 

Anatomy  of  Successive  Flushes  2k 

Anatomy  of  Cultivars  $k 

SUMMARY  AND  CONCLUSIONS 67 

BIBLIOGRAFHY  69 

BIOGRAPHICAL  SKETCH 75 


iii 


LIST  OF  TABLES 


Table  Page 

1.  Cumulative  percentage  rooting  of  air  layered  avocado 

cultivars  and  seedling  trees  12 

2.  Number  of  days  to  maximum  rooting  of  air  layered  avo- 
cado cultivars  and  seedling  trees  13 


LIST  OF  FIGURES 

Figure  Page 

1.  Rooting  of  air  layers  of  all  avocado  cultivars  and 

seedling  trees 9 

2.  Rooting  of  air-layered  Mexican  seedling  trees  (M  1 

and  M  2) ,  Hickson.,  and  Taylor  avocados  10 

3-  Rooting  of  air-layered  Booth  8,  Booth  7,   and  Pollock 

avocados  11 

h.     Transverse  section  of  second-flush  Booth  8  avocado  ...  15 

5.  Tangential  section  of  second-flush  Hickson  avocado  ...  17 

6.  Transverse  section  of  Booth  7  avocado 19 

7.  Tangential,  section  of  Hickson  avocado  21 

8.  Typical  concentric  starch  grains  of  avocado  23 

9.  Transverse  section  of  etiolated  second -flush 

Mexicola  avocado 25 

10.  Transverse  section  of  Booth  8  avocado  near  the 

terminal 26 

11.  Transverse  section  of  Booth  8  avocado  near  the 

terminal  27 

12.  Transverse  section  of  third-flush  Booth  8  avocado  ....  28 

13.  Transverse  section  of  fourth-flush  Booth  8  avocado  ...  30 
Ik.     Transverse  section  of  fifth-flush  Booth  8  avocado  ....  32 

15.  Transverse  section  of  sixth-flush  Booth  8  avocado  ....  3^ 

16.  Transverse  section  of  eighth-flush  Booth  8  avocado  ...  36 

17-  Transverse  section  of  sixth-flush  Taylor  avocado  38 

18.  Tangential  section  of  sixth-flush  Booth  8  avocado  ....  ^-0 


LIST  OF  FIGURES  -  Continued 

Figure  Page 

19.  Tangential  section  of  sixth-flush  Booth  8  avocado  ....  k2 

20.  Transverse  section  of  first-flush  Hickson  avocado  . kk 

21.  Transverse  section  of  second-flush  Hickson  avocado  ...  k6 

22.  Transverse  section  of  third-flush  Hickson  avocado  ....  k8 

23.  Transverse  section  of  first-flush  Taylor  avocado  50 

2k.     Transverse  section  of  fifth-flush  Taylor  avocado  52 

25.  Transverse  section  of  second-flush  Pollock  avocado  ...  55 

26.  Transverse  section  of  second-flush  Booth  7  avocado  ...  57 

27.  Transverse  section  of  second-flush  Booth  8  avocado  ...  59 

28.  Transverse  section  of  second-flush  Taylor  avocado  ....  6l 

29.  Transverse  section  of  second-flush  Gainesville  seedling 
avocado 63 


v- 


Abstract  of  Dissertation  Presented  to  the 

Graduate  Council  of  the  University  of  Florida  in  Partial  Fulfillment 

of  the  Requirements  for  the  Degree  of  Doctor  of  Pnilosophy 


ANATOMICAL  ASPECTS  OF  AVOCADO  STEMS 
AND  THEIR  RELATION  TO  ROOTING 


By 

Ricardo  E.  Gomez 

December,  1971 

Chairman:  James  Soule 

Co -Chairman:  Simon  E.  Malo 

Major  Department:  Fruit  Crops 

Avocado  rootstocks  of  known  parentage  are  desirable  for  research 
and  commercial  uses.  Present  stocks  are  seedlings,  which  are  variable. 
This  investigation  was  undertaken  to  determine  whether  avocado  cultivars 
commonly  grown  in  Florida  could  be  propagated  as  air  layers  and  to  inves- 
tigate anatomical  aspects  of  stems  which  influence  the  rooting  of  cuttings. 

Air  layers  were  put  on  June  17,  September  9>  November  11,  1969, 
and  March  10,  April  15,  and  June  2k,   1970.  Cultivars  were  'Pollock1, 
'Booth  7',  'Booth  8',  'Hickson',  and  'Taylor'  and  2  Mexican  seedlings. 
The  last  had  the  highest  percentage  rooting  while  'Pollock'  and  'Booth  7' 
has  the  lowest  percentage.   'Booth  8',  'Hickson'  and  'Taylor'  were  inter- 
mediate. Air  layers  made  in  June  and  April  required  the  shortest 
period  for  rooting  and  the  ones  in  November  the  longest  time. 

Six  contiguous  growth  flushes  from  the  terminal  end  of  a  branch, 
as  well  as  the  eighth  and  tenth,  were  collected  from  'Waldin',  'Pollock', 
•Catalina',  "Booth  7',  'Booth  8',  'Hickson',  'Lula',  'Taylor*,  'Gainesville' 
(parent  tree),  'Brogdon',  'Mexicola',  and  the  2  Mexican  seedling  trees. 


Material  was  cut  into  0  5  cm  lengths,  killed  in  FAA  and  softened  in  glycerol - 
alcohol  colution.  Sections  35  M   thick  were  cut  on  a  sliding  microtome  and 
treated  with  phloroglucinol-HCl  or  IKI.   Photomicrographs  were  made  of 
selected  sections. 

General  details  of  stem  anatomy  corroborated  earlier  reports.  Series 
of  sections  made  progressively  from  the  terminal  toward  the  proximal  end 
revealed  that  as  the  stem  grows  in  diameter  the  fiber-sclereid  ring  starts 
to  break  down,  especially  when  the  phloem  rays  begin  to  diverge.  Etiolat- 
ed stems  were  found  to  have  less  lignification  of  cells  than  non- etiolated. 
It  was  also  found,  that  the  frequency  of  the  fiber  bundles  and  the  sclereid 
connection  was  greatest  for  West  Indian  cultivars  and  least  for  Mexican 
seedling  trees.  Guatemalan  cultivars  and  hybrid  types  were  intermediate. 
The  fact  that  avocados  of  Mexican  origin  generally  root  better  than  those 
of  the  West  Indian  race  is  recognized  and  has  been  supported  by  the  air- 
layering  experiments  described  above. 

The  origin  of  adventitious  roots  in  most  plants  is  in  the  periphery 
of  the  cambial  zone,  consequently  it  is  reasonable  to  presume  that  if  a 
barrier  of  fibers  and  sclereids  is  present,  the  race  having  the  lower 
degree  of  lignification  should  root  best.  This  has  been  shown  to  be  true 
of  the  Mexican  race  as  compared  to  the  West  Indian  cultivars. 


INTRODUCTION 

Vegetative  reproduction  by  graftage  has  long  been  used  success- 
fully for  many  tropical  fruit  crops.  Commercial  plantings  of  avocado 
(Persea  americana  Mill.)  in  many  parts  of  the  world  utilize  plants 
grafted  on  seedling  stocks.  These  stocks  are  highly  variable;  therefore, 
possible  stock-scion  interactions  can  not  be  readily  evaluated.  Genet- 
ically uniform  rootstocks  would  permit  nutritional  studies  and  other 
useful  investigations  from  which  a  larger  and  more  uniform  production  of 
fruits  might  be  obtained.  Propagation  of  avocado  stocks  by  means  of 
cuttings  and  air  layerage  has  been  attempted  in  California  (hk,   kp,  58, 
59),  Israel  (72,  81),  and  Florida  (kj,   U8,  50,  %)   but  success  thus  far 
has  been  limited  mainly  to  cultivars  of  the  Mexican  race. 

Objectives  of  the  present  investigation  vere  to  determine  whether 
avocado  cultivars  commonly  grown  in  South  Florida  could  be  propagated 
by  air  layering  and  to  study  anatomical  aspects  of  stems  which  might 
influence  the  rooting  of  cuttings  of  different  cultivars  or  races. 


LITERATURE  REVIEW 

Avocado,  unlike  cultivars  of  some  important  horticultural  crops 
such  as  citrus  and  mango,  does  not  exhibit  polyembryony .  Vegetative 
reproduction  of  avocado  by  means  of  cuttings  and  layers  has  been  widely 
studied  (8,  16,  22,  27,  28,  29,  32,  33,  3^,  35,  36,  hi,  k2,   kk,   '45,  k7, 
48,.  50,  56,  58,  59,  &,   67,  72,  81,  82). 

The  nutritive  status  of  the  stock  plant  greatly  influences  the 
development  of  roots  and  shoots  (3,  13,  33,  36,  50,  59,  63,  68,  73,  80)  ■ 
Special  consideration  has  been  given  to  the  relative  amounts  of  carbo- 
hydrates and  nitrogen  (N).  Starring  (7^)  observed  that  cuttings  taken 
from  tomato  plants  which  had  a  high  carbohydrate  and  low  N  content  rooted 
better  than  plants  with  low  carbohydrate  and  high  N.  This  is  true  with 
other  species  of  plants  (3^,  51,  60,  7M •  However,  Haun  and  Cornell  (37) 
noted  that  cuttings  of  geranium  (Pelargonium  hortorum  Bailey  cv.  Ricard) 
grown  under  high  N  had  larger  and  more  numerous  roots,  but  fewer  cuttings 
rooted  when  compared  to  cuttings  from  low  N  regimes .  Carbohydrate  and  N 
levels  can  be  used  to  predict  the  rooting  capabilities  in  some  plants 
(3^)-  Young  (82)  reported  that  cuttings  taken  from  avocado  trees  under 
medium  and  high  N  regimes  retained  their  leaves  for  a  longer  period  of 
time  when  those  from  low  N  regimes.  Rodrigues  and  Ryan  (65)  have  report- 
ed the  carbohydrate  content  in  avocado  shoots  and  Cameron  and  Borst  (9) 
starch  in  6-year  old  Mexican  seedling  trees;  Bingham  (5)  and  Embleton 
etal.  (17,  18)  the  N  content  of  leaves  of  avocado.   High  carbohydrate 


2 


levels  may  be  required  to  sustain  the  cutting  until  they  root  (34)  since 
rooting  requires  several  months  (47,  48). 

Application  of  growth-promoting  substances  is  a  common  practice  in 
commercial  rooting  of  cuttings  of  many  species.   Initiation  of  adventitious 
roots  may  be  controlled  by  the  level  of  auxin  within  the  tissue  or  by  a 
balance  between  auxin  and  other  compounds  (25).  Very  high  concentrations 
of  auxin  are  sometimes  needed  to  enhance  rooting  in  plants  (49,  "(1,   79)- 
Most  experiments  involving  rooting  of  avocado  cuttings  have  used  concentra- 
tions varying  from  0  to  500  and  up  to  4,000  parts  per  million  (ppm)  (36, 
45,  47,  48,  58,  81),  or  considerably  lower  than  the  10,000  to  30,000  ppm 
used  for  rooting  of  tea  and  certain  other  plants  (20,  34). 

Cuttings  from  young  avocado  seedlings  root  faster  and  with  a  higher 
percentage  of  success  than  those  from  more  mature  plants  (22,  33>  45,  8l). 
Gillespie  (28)  obtained  sections  from  a  4-year  old  Mexican  seedling  that 
had  been  cut  back  to  30  cm.  He  made  3  cuttings  from  each  section  and 
found  that  the  basal  cutting  rooted  the  fastest,  and  the  terminal  the 
slowest.  Contrary  to  this,  Ya'Acob  and  Kadman  (81)  and  Piatt  and  Frclich 
(58)  reported  that  terminal  cuttings  rooted  better.  Leal  and  Krezdorn 
(48)  using  immature  stem  tips  of  'Gainesville'  (a  Mexican  race  seedling) 
obtained  90%   rooting  after  7  months.  Eyan  et  al.  (66)  observed  that 
'Hass'  avocado  cuttings  had  not  rooted  after  7  months.  T.  J.  Anderson 
of  Mulberry,  Florida,  air  layered  the  top  branches  (10-15  cm  diameter) 
of  'Winter  Mexican'  avocado  and  obtained  rooting  after  1  year.   Sen 
et  al.  (70)  ringed  1,  2,  and  3-year  old  shoots  on  a  35-year  old  mango 


1 
Personal  observation  by  the  author. 


in  June  and  after  kO   days  detached  them.   Indolebutyric  acid  was  applied 
as  a  dip  (2,000  ppm)  and  as  a  powder  (5,000  ppm)  before  planting.  The 
3-year  old  wood  gave  the  highest  percentage  of  rooting. 

Adventitious  roots  may  arise  from  pre-existing  primordia  or  be 
newly  formed  in  the  vicinity  of  differentiating  vascular  tissues  (1,  2, 
4,  10,  11,  12,  15,  20,  30,  31,  62,  73,  78).   In  young  stems,  root 
primordia  are  formed  from  interfascicular  parenchyma  cells  while  in 
older  stems  they  may  be  derived  from  a  vascular  ray  (77)- 

Etiolation  of  shoots  from  which  cuttings  and  air  layers  are  made 
has  proved  beneficial  in  many  instances  (23,  3^,  39,    40,  46,  53>  5fj>  55-» 
62,  73)  and  specifically  in  avocado  (22,  45,  8l).   Penfcund  (57)  report- 
ed that  stems  of  Helianthus  and  Polygonum  growing  in  full  sunlight  had  a 
much  greater  amount  of  xylem  and  more  and  thicker  walled  fibers  and 
sclereid  cells  than  those  in  the  shade.   Priestley  (61)  found  that 
etiolated  stems  had  a  well  developed  endodermis  and  concluded  that  an 
etiolated  stem  was  somewhat  like  a  root  in  structure.  Bond  (6)  also 
reached  a  similar  conclusion  with  legumes.  The  added  growth  in  length 
of  etiolated  stems  was  the  result  of  cells  being  longer  rather  than 
being  more  numerous  (7)- 

Anatomical  structure  of  the  stem  has  been  related  to  the  ability 
of  stems  to  form  adventitious  roots.  Beakbane  (4)  reported  that  shoots 
of  difficult-to-root  varieties  of  apples,  pears,  and  other  plants  are 
often  characterized  by  a  high  degree  of  sclerification  (fibers  and  sclereids) 
in  the  phloem.  For  instance,  'Conference1  pear  has  an  almost  continuous 
cylinder  of  mature,  thick-walled  fibers  which  appears  in  transverse 
section  as  a  ring  of  lignified  tissue  encircling  the  secondary  phloem. 


Shy-rooting  clones  of  Hevea  brasiliensis  have  also  teen  found  to  possess 
an  almost  unbroken  cylinder  or  ring  of  mature  lignified  elements.  Gardner 
(as  reported  by  Beakbane  (U))  found  that  the  rooting  capacity  of  stooled 
plants  diminished  as  the  continuity  of  the  ring  increased.  Galkin  (2k) 
was  able  to  determine  the  rooting  ability  of  apples  by  the  amount  of 
hard  bast  fibers  in  the  bark. 

The  anatomical  structure  of  avocado  stems  of  seedlings  of  Mexican 
or  Mexican  hybrid  parentage  has  been  described  by  Heismann  (38)  and 
Schroeder  (69).  Metcalfe  and  Chalke  (52)  have  reported  the  general 
anatomical  characteristics  of  the  family  Lauraceae,  and  Stern  (75)  has 
specifically  described  the  xylem  anatomy  of  Lauraceae. 


MATERIAL  AND  METHODS 


Air  Layers 


Air  layers  were  made  at  the  University  of  Florida  Agricultural 
Research  and  Education  Center  Homestead,  Homestead,  Florida.  Plants  of 
West  Indian  (Wl),  Guatemalan  (G),  and  Mexican  (M)  germplasm  were  used  in 
this  study.  There  were  2  plants  each  of  'Pollock"  (Wl)  (6<i),  'Booth  7' 
(WI  x  G),  'Booth  8'  (Wl  x  G),  'Hickson'  (Wl  x  g),  'Taylor'  (G)  and  2 
Mexican  race  seedling  trees  designated  M  1  and  M  2.  Ten  air  layers  per 
variety  were  applied  on  June  17,  September  9 >   and  November  11,  19&9,  and 
March  10,  April  15  and  June  ?.h,   1970-  Branches  1  to  2  cm  in  diameter  were 
girdled  and  a  strip  of  bark  2  to  3  cffi  wide  was  removed.  Moist  sphagnum 
moss  was  placed  around  the  branch  at  the  ringed  area  and  wrapped  with 
heavy-duty  aluminum  foil.  Experiments  simulated  commercial  conditions. 
Individual  air  layers  were  examined  for  the  appearance  of  roots  on  the 
dates  when  new  air  layers  were  applied  and  on  September  30,  1970,  and 
February  9 ,   1971 >   3&   to  5l8  days  after  propagation.  Branches  were 
examined  periodically  and  reringed  at  the  same  place  if  a  callus  bridge 
was  found.  Percentage  rooting  was  calculated  from  the  number  rooted 
after  subtracting  those  lost  from  wind  or  cultural  damage. 

Anatomical  Studies 

Avocados  used  for  microscopic  examination  were  'Waldin',  'Pollock', 
•Catalina'  (Wl),  "Booth  7',  'Booth  8',  'Hickson',  'Lula',  (M  x  WI), 


•Taylor',  'Gainesville'  ,  'Brogdon'  (M  x  WI),  'Mexicola'  (M),  and  the 
2  Mexican  seedling  trees  (M  1  and  M  2).  Observations  were  made  on  3 
other  species,  Persea  scheideana  Nees,  Phoebe  mexicana  Meissn.,  and 
Licaria  triandra  (Sw.)  Kostern.  Six  continuous  growth  flushes  as  well 
as  the  eighth  and  tenth  from  the  terminal  end  of  the  branch  were  collect- 
ed from  the  avocado  cultivars  and  seedlings,  while  a  random  sample  was 
taken  from  each  of  the  other  3  species.  Material  was  cut  into  pieces 
approximately  0.5  cm  in  all  dimensions.  Tissues  were  killed  in  formalin- 
acetic  acid-95^  alcohol  solution  (FAA;  5,5^5  v:v:v),  as  described  by 
Childs  et  al.  (1*0,  and  softened  for  at  least  one  month  in  glycerol-50$ 
alcohol  (1:1,  v;v)  (21).  Sections  were  cut  at  35  p.   on  a  sliding  micro- 
tome and  treated  with  phloroglucinol-HCl  (^3).   Some  sections  were 
treated  with  iodine -potass  in:;,  iodide  (IKI)  solution  to  determine  the 
presence  of  starch.   Photomicrographs  were  made  of  selected  sections. 
Line  drawings  were  made  to  aid  in  the  identification  of  tissues  or  zones. 


1 
Material  for  sections  was  obtained  from  parent  tree,  a  Mexican  seedling. 


RESULTS  AND  DISCUSSION 


Air  Layers 


Average  percentage  rooting  of  all  cultivars  and  seedlings  is  shown 
in  Fig.  1.  A  decrease  in  rooting  is  apparent  in  September  and  November. 
Three  distinct  groups  appear  if  the  data  from  the  cultivars  are  separated 
(Figs.  2  and  3):  Mexican  seedlings  (M  1  and  M  2);  'ilickson'  and  'Taylor* ; 
and  'Booth  7'  and  'Pollock'.   'Booth  8*  does  not  fit  into  any  of  the 
groups  but  does  resemble  'Kicksoa'  and  'Taylor'  with  a  time  displacement 
of  about  five  months.  Apparently,  the  cultivars  or  seedlings  of  a  race 
behave  similarly  as  to  rooting.  West  Indian -Guatemalan  hybrids  may  be- 
have like  the  race  of  either  parent,  as  'Booth  7',  or  unlike  either  one, 
as  'Booth  8'. 

The  Mexican  trees  had  the  highest  percentage  of  rooting  throughout 
the  year,  75  to  100$,  'Booth  7'  and  'Pollock'  had  the  lowest  percentages, 
22  to  60%,   and  'Hickson'  and  'Taylor'  were  intermediate,  from  13  to  80$ 
(Table  1).  Rooting  of  'Booth  8'  varied  from  38  to  88$.  The  Guatemalan 
group  had  a  marked  decrease  in  rooting  in  the  fall. 

An  important  factor  in  determining  the  feasibility  of  air  layering 
avocados  is  the  time  required  for  rooting  to  take  place.   The  time  for 
initial  rooting  to  take  place  is  shown  in  Table  1  and  the  number  of 
days  to  maximum  rooting,  in  Table  2. 


CO 


(9 

h 

O 

a 


70 


6  0 


\.«^ 


SOh 


■J L. 


J^_™_J»_„,L 


JJASONDJ 

1969 


M  A  M 

19  70 


BATE     MADE 


Fig.  1.  Rooting  of  air  lay< 
and  seedling  trees, 


of  all  avocado  cultivars 


10 


100 
90 
80 
70 

e>    CO 

H     SO 

O 

°     40 

fcS     SO 

20 

10 


j     j    ~a     s     o     ra     d     J      f    rj     a     r;i     j 

1969  1970 

DATE      MADE 


Fig-.  2.  Rooting  of  air-layered  Mexican  seedling  trees  (M  1  and 
M  2),  Hickson  (H),  and  Taylor  (T)  avocados. 


11 


100 

90 

SO 

70 
O 
2     60 


O 
O 


EC 
40 
30 

20 

10 

G 


J      A       S       0       Fv3       D       J        F      til       A      M       J 
1969  1970 

DATE    MADE 


Fig..  3.  Rooting  of  air-layered  Booth  8  (B  8),  Booth  7  (B  7), 
and  Pollock  (p)  avocados. 


12 


Table  1,  Cumulative  percentage  rooting  of  air  layered  avocado  cultivars  and 
seedling  trees 


Month  made 

.  >nth 

checked 

Cultivar 

l 

969 

19 

i0 

1971 

or  tree 

Sept. 

Nov. 

March 

April 

June 

Sept. 

Feb. 

Pollock 

June,  1969 
Sept. 

0 

11 
0 

22 
22 

33 

Nov. 

0 

0 

22 

33 

March,  1970 

0 

0 

1*0 

April 

0 

kk 

June 

0 

25 

Booth  7 

June,  I969 

0 

30 

ko 

ho 

Sept. 

0 

50 

50 

50 

Nov. 

0 

0 

0 

0 

22 

March,  1970 

0 

0 

-: 

60 

April 

0 

20 

40 

June 

0 

33 

Booth  0 

June,  I969 

^ 

63 

rs 

Sept . 

1] 

66 

77 

77 

Tt 

88 

Nov. 

33 

50 

■v. 

83 

March,  1970 

0 

0 

13 

38 

April 

0 

38 

63 

June 

0 

t< 

Hickson 

June,  I969 
Sept. 

70 

80 

0 

80 

]  :  1 

80 

36 

Nov. 

0 

0 

13 

]  j 

March,  1970 

0 

0 

50 

April 

0 

0 

^3 

June 

0 

55 

Taylor 

June,  I969 

0 

22 

77 

Sept. 

<) 

0 

0 

0 

0 

13 

Nov. 

0 

0 

0 

0 

38 

March,  1970 

0 

0 

0 

57 

April 

0 

0 

63 

June 

6 

50 

Mexican  1 

June,  I969 
Sept. 

63 

88 

0 

80 

Nov. 

0 

60 

70 

80 

March,  1970 

0 

25 

100 

April 

0 

60 

80 

June 

0 

90 

Mexican  2 

June,  I969 
Sept. 

50 

7  5 
0 

100 

Nov. 

0 

0 

60 

88 

100 

March,  1970 

0 

0 

60 

80 

April 

0 

25 

75 

June 

0 

90 

13 


ff. 

r. 

;■■> 

0 

a 

C) 

';■, 

M 

4' 

4h 

.') 

!>■' 

i' 

U 

•:H 

o; 

H 

fl 

-O 

l- 

!,; 

."• 

C-l 

ft 

to 

>;l 
a) 

> 


CJ 

3 

to 

u 

0) 

•H 

f) 

K 

h 

a> 

!  ■ 

B 

VD         H 

-*        CO 


^r      co 


g 

S 

On 
VO 

i-i 

(U 

ON 

(U 

+> 

H 

f 

cJ 

9 

P 

>-3 

0  I 

r-i 


(■■-; 


■  ! 

i    1 

m 

(  ) 

(VI 

.    i 

.-: 

!■    1 

o 
co 
C\J 


ON 

0\ 
CM 


-*      o\ 

O         CT\ 
C\J         CM 


ON 

!- 

Ox 

:• 

CXJ 

m 

(  > 

ir\ 

r  ; 

H 

V 

o 

: 

t 

.c 

H 

.. : 

t 

-,-i 

'•■ 

H 

t, 

0) 

ed 

P< 

:• 

i ! 

< 

«* 

Ill 


The  2  Mexican  seedlings  and  ' Pollock'  rooted  in  the  fewest  number 
of  days.  Air  layers  of  'Booth  7'  and  'Hickson'  were  intermediate  and 
'Taylor'  and  'Booth  8*  required  the  longest  period  for  rooting.  All 
avocados  except  'Booth  0'  and  'Taylor'  took  longer  to  root  when  the  air 
layers  were  made  in  November.   'Pollock'  was  inconsistent  in  the  time 
required  but  the  others  seemed  to  follow  a  pattern.   'Pollock'  air  layers 
required  a  shorter  time  to  root,  but  only  a  few  rooted.  Those  from  Mexi- 
can trees  also  required  a  shorter  time  to  root  and  most  of  the  branches 
rooted . 

Average  number  of  days  to  maximum,  rooting  for  all  cultivars  and 
seedlings  was  398  for  air  layers  made  in  ftovember,  300  in  March,  280  in 
April,  2'i5  in  June,  and  308  in  September. 

Anatomical  Studies 

General  Stem  Anatomy 

Examination  of  transverse  and  tangential  sections  of  second-flush 
growth  (Figs,  h   and  5),  shoved  the  following  features:  Isodiametric  paren- 
chyma cells  in  the  pith,  primary  xylem  composed  of  lines  of  vessels  increas- 
ing in  size,  secondary  xylem  with  scattered  vessels  (diffuse  porous)  occur- 
ring singly  or  2  or  more  together  and  prominent  unicellular  rays,  a  more  or 
less  well  defined  but  irregular  cambial  layer,  a  definite  continuation 
of  rays,  numerous  sieve  tubes,  companion  cells,  and  inclusions  in  a 
broad  phloem,  clusters  of  fibers  connected  by  sclereids  between  the  phloem 
and  cortex  (Figs.  6  and  7),  a  broad,  essentially  uniform  cortex  composed 
of  cells  similar  to  those  in  the  pith,  no  apparent  'starch  sheath' 
(although  seme  cells  contained  starch  grains  (Fig.  8),  which  correspond 
to  those  of  the  potato  ( Solanum  tuberosum  L.)  group  as  described  by 


15 


A.  Line  drawing  (Ep-  epidermis,  Co-  cortex,  PvR-  peri- 
vascular ring,  Ph-  phloem,  C-  cambium,  Xy-  xylem,  P- 
pith). 


Fig.  h.     Transverse  section  of  second-flush  Booth  8  avocado 


16 


B.      Photomicrograph  (x  150) 


17 


A.  Line  drawing  (Co-  cortex,  F-  fibers,  Ph-  phloem, 
C-  cambium,  Xy-  xylem). 


Fig.  5.  Tangential  section  of  second-flush  Hickson  avocado. 


18 


B.      Photomicrograph  (x  150) 


19 


A.  Line  drawing  (Co-  cortex,  F-  fibers,  Sc-  sclereids, 
Ph-  phloem) . 


Fig.  6.  Transverse  section  of  Booth  7  avocado. 


B.      Photomicrograph  (x  171*0 


21 


A.  Line  drawing  (co-  cortex,  F-  fibers,  Sc-  sclereids) 


Fig.  7.  Tangential  section  of  Hickson  avocado. 


22 


B.      Photomicrograph   (x  150) 


23 


Fig.  8.  Typical  concentric  starch  grains  of  avocado  (x  U286), 


2k 


Esau  (19))  and  a  thick  epidermal  layer.  Etiolated  stems  of  avocado 
(Fig.  9)  differ  from  the  above  in  that  a  well  defined  collenchyma  layer 
is  present,  fiber  bundles  are  discrete  with  little  or  no  connection  of 
sclereids,  a  well  defined  cambium  layer,  and  a  pith  which  is  larger  in 
diameter  than  in  the  non-etiolated  stem.  This  is  consistent  with  those 
plants  examined  by  Penfound  (57).   Differences  were  apparent  among  the 
cultivars  and     I   gs  in  the  clusters  of  fibers  and  the  sc.lereid  con- 
nection. These  will  be  described  in  a  later  section.   Anatomical  details 
noted  here  corroborated  earlier  reports  on  Lauraceae  and  Persea  americana 
Mill.  (38,  52,  69,  75),  and  vere  also  similar  in  the  other  3  species  of 
Lauraceae  examined  in  this  investigation. 

Anatomy  of  Successive  Flushes 

The  gi-      xpansion  of  an  avocado  stem  is  shown  in  transverse 
sections  of  the  first,  third  through  sixth,  and  eighth  flush  of  'Booth  8' 
(Figs.  10,  11,  12,  13,  14,  15,  16).   Sections  cut  about  1  mm  from  the 
terminal  showed  that  epidermal  hairs  (Fig.  10)  were  abundant,  fibers  were 
not  lignified  (Fig.  11)  and  little  cellular  organization  occurred. 
Figures  10  and  11  are  serial  photomicrographs  of  a  transverse  section. 
Sections  of  older  stem  tissues  (Figs.  12-16)  showed  that  the  progressive 
expansion  of  the  stem  was  accompanied  by  a  separation  of  the  fiber  bundles 
and  a  decrease  in  the  width  of  the  layer  of  sclereids  connecting  them. 
Divergent  phloem  rays  appear  in  the  fourth-flush  (Fig.  13).  They  become 
more  prominent  as  the  stem  increases  in  diameter.  There  is  an  almost 
complete  break  down  of  the  sclerenchy^a  ring  at  the  eighth  flush  (Fig.  l6) . 
A  transverse  section  of  the  sixth-flush  of  'Taylor'  avocado  (Fig.  17) 
shows  a  divergent  ray,  parenchyma  type  ray  cells  and  a  few  lignified 


25 


;  v  *\ 


Fig.  9-  Transverse  section  of  etiolated  second- flush 
Mexicola  avocado. 


26 


Fig.  10.  Transverse  section  of  Booth  3  avocado  near  the 
terminal  (x  ^30) • 


27 


Fig.  11.  Transverse  section  of  Booth  8  avocado  near  the 
terminal  (x  1+30) . 


23 


A.   Line  drawing  (Co-  cortex,  PvR-  perivascular  ring, 
Ph-  phloem,  C-  cambium,  Xy-  xylem,  P-  pith). 


Fig.  12.  Transverse  section  of  third-flush  Booth  8  avocado. 


29 


B.      Photomicrograph  (x  150) 


30 


A.  Line  drawing  (Ep-  epidermis,  Co-  cortex,  PvR-  peri- 
vascular ring,  Ph-  phloem,  C-  cambium,  Xy-  xylem). 


Fig.  13-  Transverse  section  of  fourth-flush  Booth  8  avocado. 


31 


B.      Photomicrograph   (x  150) 


32 


A.  Line  drawing  (Ep-  epidermis,  Co-  cortex,  PvR-  peri- 
vascular ring,  Ph-  phloem,  C-  cambium,  Xy-  xylem). 


Fig.  Ik .  Transverse  section  of  fifth-flush  Booth  8  avocado. 


33 


B.      Photomicrograph  (x  150) 


3^ 


A.  Line  drawing  (Co-  cortex,  PvR-  perivascular  ring, 
Ph-  phloem,  PhR-  phloem  ray,  C-  cambium,  Xy-  xylem), 


Fig.  15.  Transverse  section  of  sixth-flush  Booth  8  avocado. 


35 


Photomicrograph  (x  150) 


36 


A.  Line  drawing  (Co-  cortex,  PvR-  perivascular  ring, 
Ph-  phloem,  PhR-  phloem  ray). 


Fig.  l6.  Transverse  section  of  eighth-flush  Booth  8  avocado. 


37 


B.   Photomicrograph  (x  150) 


38 


A.  Line  drawing  (Co-  cortex,  F-  fibers,  Sc-  sclereids, 
PhR-  phloem  ray,  Ph-  phloem). 


Fig.  17.  Transverse  section  of  sixth-flush  Taylor  avocado. 


39 


B.     Photomicrograph  (x  ^30) 


uo 


A.  Line  drawing  (Co-  cortex,  F-  fibers,  Sc-  sclereids), 


Fig.  18.  Tangential  section  of  sixth-flush  Booth  8  avocado. 


Ul 


B.     Photomicrograph  (x  150) 


k2 


A.   Line  drawing  (F-  fibers,  Sc-  sclereids) 


Fig.  19.  Tangential  section  of  sixth-flush  Booth  8  avocado. 


^3 


B.      Photomicrograph  (x  *+30) 


kk 


A.  Line  drawing  (Co-  cortex,  PvR-  perivascular  ring, 
Ph-  phloem) . 


Fig.  20.  Transverse  section  of  first-flush  Hickson  avocado. 


h$ 


****** 


B.  Photomicrograph  (x  ^30) 


4b 


A.   Line  Drawing  (Co-  cortex,  PvR-  perivascular  ring, 
Ph-  phloem) . 


Fig.  21.  Transverse  section  of  second-flush  Hickson  avocado. 


hi 


B.      Photomicrograph  (x  H30) 


kQ 


A.  Line  drawing  (Co-  cortex,  PVR-  perivascular  ring, 
Ph-  phloem) . 


Fig.  22.  Transverse  section  of  third-flush  Hickson  avocado. 


h9 


B.  Photomicrograph  (x  ^30) 


50 


A.  Line  drawing  (Ep-  epidermis,  Co-  cortex,  PvR  peri- 
vascular ring,  Ph-  phloem,  C-  cambium,  Xy-  xylem, 
P-  pith). 


Fig.  23.  Transverse  section  of  first-flush  Taylor  avocado. 


51 


B.   Photomicrograph  (x  150) 


52 


A.   Line  drawing  (Ep-  epidermis,  Co-  cortex,  PvR-  peri- 
vascular ring,  PhR-  phloem  ray,  Ph-  phloem,  C-  cambium, 
Xy-  xylem,  XyR-  xylem  ray). 


Fig.  2k.     Transverse  section  of  fifth-flush  Taylor  avocado. 


53 


B.      Photomicrograph  (x  150) 


5k 

cells  across  the  broad  end  of  the  ray.   It  may  "be  noted  in  tangential 
sections  of  the  sixth-flush  of  'Booth  6'  (Figs.  18  and  19)  that  the  lig- 
nified  cells  connecting  the  fibers  are  not  as  compact  or  as  continuous 
as  those  in  Fig.  7.  The  separation  of  fiber  bundles  and  decrease  in 
thickness  and  continuity  of  the  ring  is  clearly  noted  in  transverse 
sections  of  contiguous  flushes  of  'Hickson*  (Figs.  20,  21  and  22).  The 
separation  of  bundles  and  discontinuity  of  the  fiber  ring  is  even  more 
apparent  in  non-contiguous  growth  flushes  of  'Taylor'  (Figs.  23  and  2k). 

Anatomy  of  Cultivars 

Transverse  sections  of  the  second-flush  of  'Pollock',  'Booth  7', 
'Booth  8',  'Taylor'  and  'Gainesville'  avocado  are  shown  in  Figs.  25,  26 
27,  23,  and  29,  respectively.  These  cultivars  ani  seedling  ('Gainesville') 
were  chosen  as  representative  of  those  examined  since  all  follow  more  or 
less  closely  the  same  structural  pattern.   It  was  evident  from  these  sec- 
tions that  the  fiber  bundles  were  larger,  closer  together,  and  definitely 
interconnected  by  more  sclerenchyma  cells  in  the  West  Indian  cultivar 
(Fig.  25)  than  those  of  the  other  races  or  hybrids.   'Gainesville'  (Fig.  29) 
appeared  to  have  the  most  loosely  organized  ring.   'Taylor'  (Fig.  28)  was 
intermediate.   'Booth  7'  (Fig.  26)  was  similar  to  the  West  Indian  type, 
while  'Booth  8'  (Fig.  27)  resembled  the  Guatemalan  parent  rather  than 
the  West  Indian. 

The  discontinuity  of  the  perivascular  sclerenchyma  ring,  divergence 
of  the  rays  and  separation  of  the  fiber  bundles  found  in  sections  examined 
in  the  present  study  were  consistent  with  Esau's  (19)  model  for  the 
thickening  of  a  dicotyledonous  stem.  The  parenchyma  type  ray  cells  may 
be  capable  of  reverting  to  'meristematic  characteristics  and  give  rise  to 
root  initials.  Etiolated  stems  resemble  the  apical  portion  of  the 


55 


A.  Line  drawing  (Ep-  epidermis,  Co-  cortex,  PvR-  peri- 
vascular ring,  Ph-  phloem,  C-  cambium,  Xy-  xylem). 


Fig.  25.  Transverse  section  of  second-flush  Pollock  avocado. 


56 


B.   Photomicrograph  (x  150) 


57 


A.  Line  drawing  (Ep-  epidermis,  Co-  cortex,  PvR-  peri- 
vascular ring,  Ph-  phloem,  C-  cambium,  Xy-  xylem) . 


Fig.  26.  Transverse  section  of  second-flush  Booth  7  avocado. 


58 


B.      Photomicrograph  (x  150) 


59 


A.  Line  drawing  (Ep-  epidermis,  Co-  cortex,  PvR-  peri- 
vascular ring,  Ph-  phloem,  C-  cambium,  Xy-  xylem) . 


Fig.  27.  Transverse  section  of  second-flush  Booth  8  avocado. 


6o 


B.  Photomicrograph  (x  150) . 


61 


Co 

/S. — "^ 

PvfU 

jf 

C                     Ph 

Xy 

^ 

A.  Line  drawing  (Ep-  epidermis,  Co-  cortex,  PvR-  peri- 
vascular ring,  Ph-  phloem,  C-  cambium,  Xy-  xylem). 


Fig.  28.  Transverse  section  of  second-flush  Taylor  avocado. 


62 


B.     Photomicrograph  (x  150) 


63 


Ac- — s£~~~^^. 

Co 

PvR 

%J^^ 

Ph 

x^    ~* 

cN 

N^. ■ — -" — " 

^-           -\ 

Xy 

~- 

A.   Line  drawing  (Co-  cortex,  PvR-  perivascular  ring, 
Ph-  phloem,  C-  cambium,  Xy-  xylem). 


Fig.  29.  Transverse  section  of  second-flush  Gainesville 
avocado . 


6U 


B.      Photomicrograph  (x  150) 


65 


terminals  in  the  lack  of  sclereids  between  the  fiber  bundles.  The  above 
may  explain  in  part  why  some  plants  which  are  difficult  to  root  by  cut- 
ting are  successfully  rooted  as  air  layers  (3^).   I-t  mav  also  explain 
the  success  in  rooting  immature  'Gainesville*  avocado  cuttings,  reported 
by  Leal  and  Krezdorn  (hQ)   as  well  as  that  of  Anderson1  in  rooting  'Winter 
Mexican'  (G  x  M)  10  to  15  cm  in  diameter  by  air  layerage. 

Many  investigators  have  had  success  with  stimulating  rooting  with 
the  use  of  auxins  (3*0.   IQ  the  case  of  avocado  little  success  has  been 
obtained  with  auxin  in  stimulating  rooting.   Some  have  shown  promotion, 
others  have  not  obtained  a  promotion  of  rooting  (35,  ^5,  ^7,  ^8,  Si). 
This  could  be  due  to  the  cultivars  or  seedlings  used  in  the  tests. 

Kadman  and  Ya'Acob  (k^>)   concluded  in  a  review  of  experiments  on 
avocado  propagation  that  Mexican  avocado  generally  roots  better  from 
cuttings  than  does  Guatemalan,  while  West  Indian  roots  the  poorest.  This 
statement  would  still  be  true  if  the  sclercnchyma  ring  were  to  act  as  a 
barrier  to  root  emergence  and  would  explai.n  the  results  obtained  with  the 
air  layers  reported  previously.  This  is  in  accord  with  Beakbane's  (k) 
conclusion  that  shoots  of  shy-rooting  plants  are  often  characterized  by 
a  high  degree  of  sclerification  in  the  phloem  and  with  Galkin  (2U),  who 
was  able  to  predict  rooting  ability  by  measuring  the  amount  of  bast 
fibers.  The  difference  in  rooting  ability  of  mature  and  juvenile  types 
of  material  may  result  from  the  degree  of  sclerification  in  the  primary 
phloem  being  much  less  in  very  young  material  (k) .     Many  years  ago, 
Gardner  (26)'  suggested  that  anatomical  differences  existed.  Stoutemyer 


1 
Personal  observation  by  the  author. 


66 


(76)  found  that  tissue  from  mature  and  juvenile  wood  of  apples  were 
nearly  identical  histologically  with  the  exception  that  the  mature  phase 
contained  more  pericyclic  fibers  than  the  juvenile. 


SUMMARY  AND  CONCLUSIONS 

General  details  of  stem  anatomy  corroborated  those  observed  by 
earlier  investigators.  Series  of  sections  made  in  progression  down  the 
stem  from  the  terminal  revealed  that  as  the  stem  grows  in  diameter  the 
fiber-sclereid  ring  starts  to  break  down,  especially  when  the  phloem  rays 
begin  to  diverge.  This  was  true  of  'Waldin',  'Pollock',  'Catalina', 
•Booth  7',  'Booth  8',  'Hickson',  'Lula',  'Taylor',  'Gainesville'  seedling, 
'Brogdon',  'Mexicola',  and  the  2  Mexican  seedling  trees.  It  was  found, 
when  the  same  flush  of  the  cultivars  or  seedlings  was  examined,  that  the 
frequency  of  the  fiber  bundles  and  the  chickness  of  the  sclereid  connec- 
tion was  greatest,  for  the  West  Indian  and  least  for  the  Mexican.  The 
Guatemalan  and  hybrids  were  intermediate.  Etiolated  shoots  have  been 
shown  to  have  a  smaller  degree  of  lignification  than  non-etiolated  stems. 
The  origin  of  adventitious  roots  in  many  plants  is  in  the  periphery  of 
the  cambial  zone,  therefore,  if  the  sclerenchyma  ring  acts  as  a  barrier, 
the  race  having  the  lower  degree  of  lignification  should  root  best. 
Mexican  avocados  were  found  to  have  less  lignification  than  the  West  Indian. 

Air  layers  were  put  on  June  17,  September  9,  November  11,  1969  and 
March  10,  April  15,  and  June  2k,   1970.  Cultivars  tested  were  'Pollock', 
•Booth  7',  'Booth  8',  'Hickson',  and  'Taylor',  and  2  Mexican  seedling 
trees.  The  lost  had  the  highest  percentage  rooting  while  'Pollock'  and 
'Booth  ">[%   had  the  lowest  percentage.   'Hickson'  and  'Taylor'  were  intermediate. 


<H 


Air  layers  made  in  June  and  April  required  the  shortest  period  for 
rooting.  The  ones  made  in  November  took  the  longest  time  to  root. 

The  experiments  with  air  layering  further  exemplifies  the  differ- 
ences in  rooting  ability  between  races  and  would  still  be  true  if  the 
fiber-sclereid  ring  acted  as  a  barrier.  Mexican  avocados  were  found 
to  have  a  lower  degree  of  lignification  and  rooted  best  while  West 
Indian  had  the  most  continuous  lignified  ring  and  rooted  the  poorest. 


BIBLIOGRAPIIY 


1.  Barman,  M.  W.  19^1 .  Vascular  rays  and  adventitious  root  formation 

in  Thuja  occidentalis  L.  Amer.  J.  Bot.  28:^57-^63. 

2.  .   19^2.  Notes  on  the  origin  of  adventitious  roots  in 

the  native  Ontario  conifers.  Amer.  J.  Bot.  29 : 59 3- 598 • 

3.  Basu,  R.  N.,  B.  Lahiri  and  P.  K.  Sen.  I967.  Biochemical  changes  during 

regeneration  in  air  layers  of  mango  (Mangifera  indica  L.). 
Curr.  Sci.  36:^13-^15. 

>+.  Beakbane,  A.  B.  I961.  Structure  of  the  plant  stem  in  relation  to 
adventitious  rooting.  Nature  192:95^-955. 

5.  Bingham,  F.  T.  I961.   Seasonal  trends  in  nutrient  composition  of  Hass 

avocado  leaves.   Proc.  Amer.  Soc.  Hort.  Sci.  78:1^9-l6o. 

6.  Bond,  G.  1935.  The  endodermis  in  light-grown  and  etiolated  shoots 

of  the  Leguminosae;  A  contribution  to  the  causal  study  of 
the  differentiation  in  the  plant.  Trans.  Roy.  Soc.  Edinburgh. 
58^09-^25. 

7.  Brotherbon,  W.,  Jr.  and  H.  H.  Bartlett.   1918.   Cell  measurement  as 

an  aid  in  the  analysis  of  variation.  Amer.  J.  Bot.  5:192-206. 

8.  Cameron,  S.  H.  1955.   Propagation  of  avocado  rootstocks.  Calif. 

Avocado  Soc.  Yearbook.  39:113_H7. 

9.    and  G.  Borst.   1933.   Starch  in  the  avocado  trees. 

proc-  Amer.  Soc.  Hort.  Sci.  36:255-258. 

10.  Carlson,  M.  C.  1930.   Origin  of  adventitious  roots  in  coleus  cuttings. 

Contr.  Boyce  Thomp.  Inst.  2-.39-U6. 

11.        .  1938.  The  formation  of  nodal  adventitious  roots  in 

Salix  cordata.  Amer.  J.  Bot.  25:721-725- 

12.  .   1950.  Nodal  adventitious  roots  in  willow  stems  of 

different  ages.  Amer.  J.  Tot.  37:555-561. 

13.  Chadwick,  L.  C.  1952.  The  importance  of  uniformity  and  timeliness 

in  the  selection  of  propagating  wood.   Proc.  Plant  Prop.  Soc. 
2:^3-50. 


70 


lU.  Childs,  J.  F.  L.,  G.  G.  Norman  and  J.  L,  Eichhorn.  1958.  A  color 
test  for  exocortis  infection  in  Por.cirus  trifoliata. 
Phytopathology  U8:H26-l+32. 

15.  Connard,  M.  H.  and  P.  W.  Zimmerman.  1931.  The  origin  of  adventitious 

roots  in  cuttings  of  Portulaca  oleracea  L.  Contr.  Boyce 
Thomp.  Inst.  3:337-31+o^ 

16.  Eggers,  E.  R.  and  F.  F.  Halma.   1937-  Rooting  avocado  cuttings. 

Calif.  Avocado  Assoc.  Yearbook  (1937) : 121-125. 

17.  Embleton,  T.  W.,  W.  W.  Jones  and  2*4.  J.  Garber.   1959-  Leaf  analysis 

as  a  guide  to  nitrogen  fertilization  of  avocado.   Calif. 
Avocado  Soc .  Yearbook  ^3:9'+ -9  5- 

18. , ,  J.  D.  Kirkpatrick  and  D.  Gregory -Allen. 

I958.   Influence  of  sampling  date,  season,  and  fertilization 
on  macronutrients  in  Fuerte  avocado  leaves.  Proc .  Amer .  Soc . 
Hort.  Sci.  72:309-320. 

19.  Esau,  K.   I967.   Plant  Anatomy.   2nd.  ed.  John  Wiley  and  Sons,  Inc., 

New  York.   767  pp. 

20.  Figueroa,  R.  II.  I966.  Relation  of  auxin  metabolism  to  the  rooting 

of  tea.  Ph.  D.  dissertation.  University  of  Florida,  Gaines- 
ville. 

21.  Forest  Products  Research  Laboratory.  19^9-  The  preparation  of  wood 

for  microscopic  examination.   Leaflet  No.  ^0,  Dept.  of  Sci. 
and  Ind.  Res.  Forest  Prod.  Res.  Lab.,  Aylosbury,  Bucks, 
England . 

22.  Frolich,  E.  F.   1951.  Rooting  Guatemalan  avocado  cuttings.  Calif. 

Avocado  Soc.  Yearbook  36:136-138. 

23.  .   I961.   Etiolation  and  the  rooting  of  cuttings. 
ProcT  Plant  Prop.  Soc.  11:277-283. 

2k.     Galkin,  V.  I.  1968.   Determination  of  the  rooting  ability  of  apples 
by  the  amount  of  hard  bast  in  shoot  bark.   Sel.  'hoz.  Biol. 
3:896-899.   (Hort.  Abs.  39:  6235.   1970.   Original  not  seen.). 

25.  Galston,  A.  W.  and  L.  Y.  Dalberg.   195'' •   The  adaptive  formation  and 

physiological  significance  of  indoleacetic  acid  oxidase. 
Amer.  J.  Bot.  14-1:373-380. 

26.  Gardner,  FI  E.  1929 .  The  relationship  between  tree  age  and  the 

rooting  of  cuttings.   Proc.  Amer.  Soc.  Hort.  Sci.  26:101-10^. 

27.  Gillespie,  H.  L.  1951*-.  Securing  rcotstock  stem-tissues  from  high 

yielding  Fuertes.  Calif.  Citrograph.  hO: 36-37. 


■n 


28.  Gillespie,  H.  L.   1956.  Preliminary  investigation  of  'residual 

juvenility1  in  avocado  seedling  stems.  Calif.  Avocado  5oc. 
Yearbook  kO : 132-3 3k. 

29. .  1957-  Stem-rooting  varietal  clones  by  means  of 

•Juvenile  Growth  Phase1  leaf -stem  nurse  cuttings.  Calif. 
Avocado  Soc.  Yearbook  ^1:9^-96. 

30.  Girouard,  R.  M.   1967a.   Initiation  and  development  of  adventitious 

roots  in  stem  cuttings  of  Hedera  helix.  Anatomical  studies 
of  the  juvenile  growth  phase.  Can.  J.  Bot.  1*5:1877-1881. 

31. .   1967b.   Initiation  and  development  of  adventitious 

roots  in  stem  cuttings  of  Hedera  helix.  Anatomical  studies 
of  the  mature  growth  phase".  Can.  J.  Bot.  ^ 5 : I883-I886 . 

32.  Halma,  F.  F.   1953-  Avocado  rnotstock  experiments  -  A  10  year  report. 
Calif.  Avocado  Soc.  Yearbook  38:79-86. 

33« and  E.  F.  Frolich.   1952.  An  approach  to  the  evaluation 

of  avocado  rootstock  variability.  Calif.  Avocado  Soc. 
Yearbook  37:15,4-158. 

3k.     Hartmarm,  H.  T.  and  D.  E.  Kester.   I96H .   Plant  Propagation.   2nd.  ed. 
Prentice  Hall,  Inc.,  Englewood  Cliffs,  N.  J.   559  PP. 

35«  Hass,  A.  R.  C.   1937.  Propagation  of  the  'Fuerte*  avocado  by  means 

of  leafy-twig  cuttings.  Calif.  Avocado  Soc.  Yearbook  (1937): 
126-130. 

36. and  J.  N.  Brusca.   1953-  The  rooting  of  leafy-twig 

avocado  cuttings.  Citrus  Leaves  33:28-29- 

37-  Haun,  J.  R.  and  P.  W.  Cornell.   1951.  Rooting  response  of  geranium 
(Pelargonium  hortorum  Bailey  var  Ricard)  cuttings  as 
influenced  by  nitrogen,  phosphorus  and  potassium  nutrition 
of  the  stock  plant.   Proc.  Amcr.  Soc  Kort.  Sci.  38:317-323. 

38.  Heismann,  P.   1939*  Notes  on  avocado  anatomy.  Calif.  Avocado  Sec. 

Yearbook  (1939): 87-91- 

39.  Herman,  D.  E.  and  C.  H.  Hess.   1963.  The  effect  of  etiolation  upon 

the  rooting  of  cuttings.   Proc.  Plant  Prop.  Soc.  13:^2-62. 

kO.     Hess,  C.  E.  1963.  Why  certain  cuttings  are  hard  to  root.   Proc. 
Plant  Prop.  Soc.  13:6371. 

kl,      Hilton,  R.  H.  and  G.  F.  Mason.   1970.   Avocado  propagation  in  Trinidad. 
Fruit  Var.  and  Hort.  Digest  2^:69-70. 


72 


i+2.  Jamaica  Agricultural  Society.  1932.  Vegetative  propagation  of 
mangos  and  avocados.  J.  Jamaica  Agr.  Soc.  36: 338-339 • 
(Hort.  Abs.  2:  292.   193^.   Original  not  seen. ). 

U3.  Johansen,  D.  A.  19^0.  Botanical  Microtechnique.  McGraw-Hill, 
New  York.   523  pp. 

hk.     Johnston,  J.  C  and  E.  F.  Frolich.   1957-  Avocado  propagation. 
Calif.  Agr.  Expt.  Sta.  Cir.  U63. 

^5.  Kadman,  A.  and  A.  B.  Ya'Acob.  1965-  A  review  of  experiments  on 
some  factors  influencing  the  rooting  of  avocado  cuttings. 
Calif.  Avocado  Sec.  Yearbook  *+9: 67-72. 

h6.     Kawase,  M.   1965b.  Etiolation  and  rooting  in  cuttings.  Physiol. 
Plant  18:1066-1076. 

47.  Leal,  F.  I966.  Enraizamiento  de  estacas  de  aguacate.  Agron . 
Trop.  l6:l4l-lH5. 

k8.  and  A.  K.  Krezdorn.   196*1 .  Rooting  avocado  cuttings. 

Proc  Fla.  St.  Hort.  Soc.  77:358-362. 

1*9.  Lindner,  R.  C.  1939.  Effects  of  indoleacetic  acid  and  naphthylacetic 
acid  on   development  of  buds  and  roots  in  horseradish.  Bot. 
Gaz.  11:500-527. 

50.  Lynch,  S.  J.  and  R.  0.  Nelson.  1956.   Current  methods  of  vegetative 

propagation  of  avocado,  mango,  lychee  and  guava  in  Florida. 
Ceiba  k: 315-337- 

51.  Manlstede,  J.  P.  1953-   Principles  of  rooting  softwood  cuttings  of 

deciduous  shrubs.   Proc.  Plant  Prop.  Soc.  3:1^0-150. 

52.  Metcalfe,  C.  R.  and  L.  Chalke.   1950.  Anatomy  of  the  Dicotyledons. 

Vol.  2: Hit 5 -11 56.  Clarendon  Press,  Oxford. 

53.  Mukherjee,  S.  K.   1967-  Standarization  of  rootstocks  of  mango 

(Mangifera  indica  L.).  II.  Studies  on  the  effect  of  source, 
invigoration  and  etiolation  on  the  rooting  of  mango  cuttings. 
J.  Hort.  Sci.  ^2:83-87. 

5^.  and  N.  N.  Bid.   1965.   Propagation  of  mango  (Mangi- 
fera indica  L.).   II.  Effect  of  etiolation  and  growth 
regulator  treatments  on  the  success  of  air  layering.   Indian 
J.  Agr.  Sci.  35:309-31^- 

55. ,  P.  K.  Majumder,  N.  N.  Bid  and  A.  M.  Gaswame.   I965. 

Clonal  propagation  of  mango  (Mangifera  indica  L.)  through 
cuttings.  Curr.  Sci.  311:^3^-^35. 


73 


56.  Ochse,  J.  J.  1950.  Avocados  and  manges  propagated  by  cuttings. 
Fla.  Grower  9:25. 

57-  Penfound,  W.  T.  1931-   Plant  anatomy  as  conditioned  by  light  inten- 
sity and  soil  moisture.  Amer.  J.  Bot.  18:558-572. 

58.   Piatt,  R.  G.  and  E.  F.  Frolich.   I965.   Propagation  of  avocados. 
Calif.  Agric.  Expt.  Gta.  Cir.  531.   19  pp. 

59. and  .   1966.   Propagation  of  avocados. 

J.  Agr.  Soc.  Trin.  Tob.  66:^9-7^ . 

60.  Preston,  W.  H.,  J.  B.  Shanks  and  P.  Cornell.   1953.   Influence  of 

mineral  nutrition  on  production,  rooting  and  survival  of 
cuttings  of  azaleas.   Proc.  Amer.  Soc.  Hort.  Sci.  63:^99-507. 

61.  Pries bley,  J.  H.   I926.  Light  and  growth.   II.   On  the  anatomy  of 

etiolated  plants.  New  Phytol.  25:145-170. 

62.  and  C.  F.  Swingle.  1929 .  Vegetative  propagation 

from  the  standpoint  of  plant  anatomy.  U.  S.  D.  A.  Tech.  Bui. 
No.  151.  99   pp.  

63.  Reid,  M.  E.  192**.  Quantitative  relations  of  carbohydrates  to  nitro- 

gen in  determining  responses  in  tomato  cuttings.  Bot.  Gaz. 
77:11.0^-^18.  

6k.     Rhodes,  A.  M.,  S.  E.  Malo,  C.  W.  Campbell  and  S.  G.  Carmer.   1971. 

A  numerical  taxonomic  study  of  the  avocado  (Persea  amerlcana 
Mill . ) .   Proc.  Amer.  Soc.  Hort.  Sci .  96 : 391  -395". 

65.  Rodrigues,  J.  and  G.  F.  Ryan.  i960.  The  influence  of  season  and 

temperature  on  carbohydrates  in  avocado  shoots.   Froc.  /oner. 
Soc.  Hort.  Sci.  76:253-261. 

66.  Ryan,  G.  F.,  E.  F.  Frolich  and  T.  P.  Kinsella.   1953.   Some  factors 

influencing  rooting  of  grafted  cuttings.   Proc.  Amer.  Soc. 
Hort.  Sci.  72:454-461. 

67.  San  Pedro,  A.   1931'  •   Preliminary  studies  on  the  marcottage  of  the 

avocado.  The  Philippine  Agr.  23:681-687. 

68.  Schrader,  A.  L.   1924.  The  relation  of  chemical  composition  to  the 

regeneration  of  roots  and  tops  on  tomato  cuttings.  Proc. 
Amer.  Soc.  Hort.  Sci.  21:187-194. 

69.  Schroeder,  C.  A.  1935-   Effects  of  sun-blotch  on  the  anatomy  of  the 

avocado  stem.  Calif.  Avocado  Soc.  Yearbook  (1935) :125-129. 


7* 


70.  Sen,  P.  K.  ,  R.  N.  Basu,  T.  K.  Bose  and  N.  Roychoudhury.   19 68. 

Rooting  of  mango  cuttings  under  mist.  Curr.  Pel.  37:1^'' -1^6. 

71.  and  T.  K.  Bose.   1964.   Physiological  studies  on  regene- 
ration of  roots.  VI.  Effect  of  growth  substances  on  root  for- 
mation in  Justicia,  mulberry  and  mango  stem  cuttings  and  con- 
comitant changes  in  carbohydrate  and  nitrogenous  substances  in 
the  rooting  tissues.   Indian  Agr.  8:102-119.   (Hort.  Abs.  36: 
256.   1966.   Original  not  seen. ) . 

72.  Shafrir,  M.   I968.  A  new  approach  to  rooting  difficult-to-root  avo- 

cado cuttings.  The  Volcani  Institute  of  Agric.  Research, 
Bet  Dagan,  Israel.  I968  series  No.  IU35-E. 

73-  Shapiro,  3.  1958.  The  role  of  light  in  the  growth  of  root  primor- 
dia  in  the  stem  of  the  Lornbardy  poplar.  The  Physiology  of 
Forest  Trees,  K.  V.  Thimann  ed.  Ronald  Press  Co.,  New  York, 
K.  Y.   p.  ^15-^65. 

7^.  Starring,  C.  C  1923-   Influence  of  the  carbohydrate-nitrate  content 
of  cuttings  upon  the  production-  of  roots.   Proc.  Amer.  Soc. 
Hort.  Sci.  20:288-292. 

75-  Stern,  W.  L.   195^.  Comparative  anatomy  of  xylem  and  phylogeny  of 
Lauraceae.  Tropical'- Woods  10.0:1-75- 

76.  Stouterayor,  V.  T.  1937-  Regeneration  in  various  types  of  apple  wood. 
Iowa  Agr.  Expt.  3ta.  Res.  Bui.  220:308-352. 

77-  Sudds,  R.  H.  1935-  The  origin  of  roots  in  several  types  of  red  and 
black  raspberry  Stem' cuttings.   Proc .  Amer.  Soc.  Hort.  Sci. 
33:380-388. 

78.  Swingle,  C.  F.  19^0.  Regeneric  and  vegetative  propagation.  Bot . 

Rev.  6:301-355- 

79.  Went,  F.  W.  and  K.  V.  Thimanr..   19^9.   Phytohormones .   2nd.  ed. 

Macmillan,  New  York,  N.  Y. 

80.  Winkler,  A.  J.   1927-   Some  factors  influencing  the  rooting  of  vine 

cuttings.  Hilgardia:.  2:;-irr".i  oi-9. 

81.  Ya'Acob,  A.  B.  and  A.  Kadman.   1964.  Rooting  of  avocado  cuttings 

under  artificial  mist  spray.   Israel  J.  Bot.  12:1^2. 

82.  Young,  L.  B.   I961.  Vegetative  propagation  in  avocados  by  means  of 

marcottage  and  "the- rooting  of  cuttings.  Calif.  Avocado  Soc. 
Yearbook  ^5: 63-66. 


BIOGRAPHICAL  SKETCH 

Ricardo  E.  Gomez  was  born  July  13,  1938  at  Havana,  Cuba.   In  June 
19 56  he  was  graduated  from  Lafayette  School  in  Havana.   In  April  1966  he 
received  the  degree  Bachelor  of  Science  in  Agriculture  with  a  major  in 
Soils  from  the  University  of  Florida  and  received  the  1965-66  Kroger 
Award  for  high  scholarship.   In  the  same  year  he  enrolled  in  the  Graduate 
School  of  the  University  of  Florida.   In  August  1968  he  received  the 
degree  Master  of  Science  in  Agriculture  with  a  major  in  Soils  from  the 
University  of  Florida.  He  was  a  graduate  student  in  the  Department  of 
Fruit  Crops  and  held  a  graduate  assistantship  provided  by  the  Agricultural 
Research  and  Education  Center,  Homestead  and  the  Center  for  Tropical  Agri- 
culture from  I968  to  19717  He  was  awarded  the  degree  Doctor  of  Philosophy 
in  December  1971.  He  received  the  T.  J.  Andersen  Memorial  Award  for  1971 
for  work  in  tropical  fruits . 

He  is  a  member  of  American  Society  for  Horticultural  Science,  Ameri- 
can Society  for  Horticultural  Science,  Tropical  Region,  Alpha  Zeta,  Gamma 
Sigma  Delta,  and  Phi  Sigma  honorary  fraternities. 

He  is  married  to  the  former  Maria  Martha  Callejas  of  Chinandega, 
Nicaragua.  He  is  the  father  of  four  children,  three  boys  and  a  girl. 


75 


I  certify  that  I  have  read  this  study  and  that  in  my  opinion  it 
conforms  to  acceptable  standards  of  scholarly  presentation  and  is  fully 
adequate,  in  scope  and  quality,  as  a  dissertation  for  the  degree  of 
Doctor  of  Philosophy. 


v/niCd  vVv^vL* 


kmes  Soule,  Chairman 
ofessor  of  Fruit  Crops 


I  certify  that  I  have  read  this  study  and  that  in  my  opinion  it 
conforms  to  acceptable  standards  of  scholarly  presentation  and  is  fully 
adequate,  in  scope  and  quality,  as  a  dissertation  for  the  degree  of 
Doctor  of  Philosophy. 


Simon  E.  Malo,  Co-Chairman 
Associate  Horticulturist 


I  certify  that  I  have  read  this  study  and  that  in  my  opinion  it 
conforms  to  acceptable  standards  of  scholarly  presentation  and  is  fully 
adequate,  in  scope  and  quality,  as  a  dissertation  for  the  degree  of 
Doctor  of  Philosophy. 


Robert  H.  Biggs     ff 
Professor  of  Fruit  Crops 


I  certify  that  I  have  read  this  study  and  that  in  my  opinion  it 
conforms  to  acceptable  standards  of  scholarly  presentation  and  is  fully 
adequate,  in  scope  and  quality,  as  a  dissertation  for  the  degree  of 
Doctor  of  Philosophy. 


I  certify  that  I  have  read  this  study  and  that  in  my  opinion  it 
conforms  to  acceptable  standards  of  scholarly  presentation  and  is  fully 
adequate,  in  scope  and  quality,  as  a  dissertation  for  the  degree  of 
Doctor  of  Philosophy. 


Richard  C.  Smith 
Associate  Professor  of  Botany 


This  dissertation  was  submitted  to  the  Dean  of  the  College  of 
Agriculture  and  to  the  Graduate  Council,  and  was  accepted  as  partial 
fulfillment  of  the  requirements  for  the  degree  of  Doctor  of  Philosophy. 


December,  1971 


ulture 


Dean,  Graduate  School 


UNIVERSITY  OF  FLORIDA 


3  1262  08552  5763