(logo)
(navigation image)
Home American Libraries | Canadian Libraries | Universal Library | Open Source Books | Project Gutenberg | Biodiversity Heritage Library | Children's Library | Additional Collections

Search: Advanced Search

Anonymous User (login or join us)Upload
See other formats

Full text of "An Ecclesiastical History of Ireland: From the Introduction of Christianity ..."

This is a digital copy of a book that was preserved for generations on library shelves before it was carefully scanned by Google as part of a project 
to make the world's books discoverable online. 

It has survived long enough for the copyright to expire and the book to enter the public domain. A public domain book is one that was never subject 
to copyright or whose legal copyright term has expired. Whether a book is in the public domain may vary country to country. Public domain books 
are our gateways to the past, representing a wealth of history, culture and knowledge that's often difficult to discover. 

Marks, notations and other marginalia present in the original volume will appear in this file - a reminder of this book's long journey from the 
publisher to a library and finally to you. 

Usage guidelines 

Google is proud to partner with libraries to digitize public domain materials and make them widely accessible. Public domain books belong to the 
public and we are merely their custodians. Nevertheless, this work is expensive, so in order to keep providing this resource, we have taken steps to 
prevent abuse by commercial parties, including placing technical restrictions on automated querying. 

We also ask that you: 

+ Make non-commercial use of the files We designed Google Book Search for use by individuals, and we request that you use these files for 
personal, non-commercial purposes. 

+ Refrain from automated querying Do not send automated queries of any sort to Google's system: If you are conducting research on machine 
translation, optical character recognition or other areas where access to a large amount of text is helpful, please contact us. We encourage the 
use of public domain materials for these purposes and may be able to help. 

+ Maintain attribution The Google "watermark" you see on each file is essential for informing people about this project and helping them find 
additional materials through Google Book Search. Please do not remove it. 

+ Keep it legal Whatever your use, remember that you are responsible for ensuring that what you are doing is legal. Do not assume that just 
because we believe a book is in the public domain for users in the United States, that the work is also in the public domain for users in other 
countries. Whether a book is still in copyright varies from country to country, and we can't offer guidance on whether any specific use of 
any specific book is allowed. Please do not assume that a book's appearance in Google Book Search means it can be used in any manner 
anywhere in the world. Copyright infringement liability can be quite severe. 

About Google Book Search 

Google's mission is to organize the world's information and to make it universally accessible and useful. Google Book Search helps readers 
discover the world's books while helping authors and publishers reach new audiences. You can search through the full text of this book on the web 



at |http : //books . google . com/ 



"■^xrv. n "^ "i "fc. H- o. s" 



Harvard College 
Library 




FROM THE BEQUEST OF 

JOHN HARVEY TREAT 

OF iJliniKlfGE. MASS. 
CLASS OF IStt 



vr4-4-i 



^4~M~M-4-1v 




f 



ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY 



IRELAND, 



INTRODUCTION OF CHRISTIANITY 

INTO THAT CODNTRY, 
TO THE YEAR MDCCCXXIX. 



REV. M. J. BRENAN, O.S.F. 



IN TWO VOLUMES. 



VOL. I. 



DUBLIN: 
JOHN COYNE, 24, COOKE-STREET. 

1840. 



^r H^^S^S-. ifO.S" 



^^^M''^ OOLfi 




/ 



tfnUrttr at ^tatfontrK' UnU. 



t. ConUi nisMr, U, Cnkcttml. BubUik 



>^<' 



y 



? 



PREFACE. 

There appears but little necessity for employ- 
ing any lengthened preliminary observations in 
recommending an Ecclesiastical History of our 
National Church to the serious attention of an 
Irish public. It matters not at what period or 
under what circumstances this Church may be 
contemplated; let it be viewed through a dispas- 
Bionate medium, either in its origin or in its pro- 
gress during the revolution of ages, and it will be 
found to contain materials^ of the highest impor- 
tance to religion and worthy of being embalmed in 
the eternal recollections of Irishmen. The ancient 
Fathers, by whom this sacred edifice had been 
originally upheld, have an undoubted claim on 
the gratitade of posterity. By their apostolic vir- 
tues they have won for their country a name which 
shall ever be cherished and of which no other 
nation can boast, that of an Island of Saints; by 
their persevering industry they have caused the 
Church of Ireland to spread and to strengthen and 



IV 



to bid defiance to the wreck of time ; but above 
all, they have transmitted it to us, as the deposi- 
tory of that faith, which in itself is the most pre- 
cious of bequests, and which no ingenuity or power 
of man has been ablfe to wrest from us. 

It is not, however, in the origin so much as in 
the triumphant progress of this Church, that its 
history becomes interesting. Centuries in rapid 
succession have rolled on; the works of man, after 
flourishing for a time, decayed and disappeared, 
but this supernatural work has continued as fair 
and as vigorous as ever; The Church of Ireland, 
it is true, has had seasons of serenity^ but it had 
also been doomed to endure the tempest and has 
passed through an ordeal of trial and persecution 
Unparalleled in the history of mankind. During 
these awful periods, the priesthood of Ireland, 
like the primitive martyrs, have been tried in the 
crucible; numbers of them sealed the faith with 
their blood, others confirmed it by exile: and 
^hile death stalked in the sanctuary and deso- 
lation spread itself around^ they nobly secured the 
iancient religion of the country and handed it down 
in triumph to succeeding generations. Are the 
heroic suflFerings of these apostolic men to be con- 
signed to oblivion? are their names and their me- 



mory to be for ever blotted out from the recoUec* 
tioos of an intelligent posterity? To obviate this 
charge of deep and foul ingratittlde has been one 
•f the motives which induced the author humbly 
to {Hresent the following concise but comprehensive 
work to the attention of his fellow-countrymen. 

History^ however, in order to be instructive, 
must be employed as a medium for illustrating 
some interesting truth. Historical facts are, in 
reality, so much data» and when accompanied with 
suitable deductions, the work becomes, as it ac- 
tually should, one of solid and practical informa- 
tion. For this reason, the present analysis of 
Irish Ecclesiastical History is oflFered to the pub- 
lic ; while among the various important truths which 
could be deduced therefrom, two principal ones 
shall be selected, and which may indeed with pro- 
priety be designated "Moral Theorems." The 
first is, "that public gratuitous education aided by 
a priesthood disengaged from the wealth, pleasures 
and dignities of this world, is one of the chief or- 
dinary means employed by Providence in the con- 
version of a nation," and the second is no less in- 
teresting and equally true, "that the superintend- 
ing power of the Almighty has been visibly dis- 
played in the protection of the Church of Ireland, 



VI 



from tlie moment of its foundation down to the 
present hour." The first of these truths shall be 
illustrated by the events connected with the primi- 
tive ages of our National Church; while the 
whole series of the History shall contribute suc- 
cessfully to establish the second. 

It may be proper to observe, that in endeavour- 
ing to compress such a variety of matter within so 
small a compass, the author could not possibly be 
as descriptive on each subject as he might have 
otherwise wished; his attention was principally 
directed to a statement of facts, for the accuracy 
of which statement reference shall be made to the 
most approved and unquestionable authorities. — 
Guided by genuine documents and divested of all 
prejudice he has been enabled to complete a faith*- 
fill record of the ecclesiastical events of his native 
country, and should it, in any degree, tend to ad- 
vance the interest of religion, his object is attained* 



ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY 



IRELAND. 



CHAPTER L 

Character of the ancient Irish previously to the introduction 
of the Gospel — T/ie Christian faith most probably hnoum 
amongst them before the precuAinf ^f Palladius — Arrival 
' of that Missionary — His departure from Ireland — St* 
Patrick — The place and period of his birth — Brought as a 
captive into Ireland — released from his captivity — Retires 
to th0 Monastery of St. Martin of Tours, and afterwards 
to Lerins — Repairs to Rome — Is elevated to the Episco- 
pacy — Receives his Ecclesiastical jurisdiction from Pope 
Celestine — Arrives in Ireland — His Apostolic labours in 
Ulster — In Connaught — In Leinster — In Munster — Estab* 
lishes his See at Armagh— Synods of St. Patrick — His 
writings-^His death and funeral obsequies — The wonderful 
mercy of the Almighty displayed in the conversion of the 
Irish Nation. 

The moral condition of Ireland in the commencement of 
the fifth century was in many respects perfectly similar to that 
of the other nations of the Gentile world. The ancient Irish 
were a brave, warlike, intelligent and an high-minded people ; 
heroism and unbounded hospitality were inseparable traits in 



their character; and although in the universal wreck which 
human nature and the human mind had undergone, they be- 
came fellow-sufferers with the rest of mankind, yet their 
idolatry and superstition were less gross and more excusable, 
in consequence of their apparent proximity to the real notions 
of the God-head, and to the laws and principles of rational 
worship. It is certain that there was neither an Hierarchy or 
a Christian Bishop in Ireland antecedent to the period of 
which we are now treating, although it is highly probable 
that the natives in many parts of the island were by no 
means unacquainted with the Christian Religion. Tacitus, 
in his life of Agricola, bestows very high encomiums on the 
harbours and commercial advantages of Ireland, and in the 
days of that writer, a very considerable trade had been kept 
up between the southern parts of Ireland and the principal 
maratime towns along the western coast of Gaul. It is 
moreover, an historically attested fact, that ever since the 
landing of the Milesians, a regular commercial intercourse 
subsisted between Spain and Ireland; and from these circum- 
stances we may with strong probability conclude, that a 
knowledge of the Christian Religion had been communicated 
to the Irish, at least in those southern districts which lay 
immediately opposite Spain and Gaul, and which had been so 
repeatedly visited by Christian merchants and other adven- 
turers from the Continent. For a long period previously to 
the reign of Nial of the nine hostages, the monarch by 
whom St. Patrick had been made a captive, the Irish princes 
were in the habit of making occasional predatory incursions 
not only on the coasts of Britain, but also on the western 
shores of the Continent, and of carrying away with them 
vast numbers of the inhabitants, whom they afterwards either 
sold or retained as menials in their own domestic employment. 
These captives were generally Christians, and considering the 
ardent zeal for which the faithful in those primitive times 
were distinguished, it is very natural to suppose, that many 



of them were the happy instruments in the hands of Provi- 
dence for spreading the liglit of the Gospel over the benighted 
minds; not only of their associates, but even of their very 
masters. That Christianity, therefore, existed at least to a 
certain extent in Ireland anterior to the fifth century, rests 
upon a presumption amounting almost to a certainty; that 
there were some priests dispersed amongst them, who upon 
the invitation of the natives, had nobly relinquished their 
own country for the advancement of the Gospel, might like- 
vnse be admitted; but as to an Hierarchy or the establish* 
ment of a Bishop in Ireland before the year 431, the pages of 
authentic history are silent, and in such a research we have 
no other light to guide us but mere hypothesis, and unsub- 
stantial conjecture. Some writers have attempted to main- 
tain that Ailbe of £mly, t)eclan of Ardmore, Ibar of Bege- 
rin, and Kieran of Saigar, were Bishops in Ireland, and had 
regular sees prior to the arrival of St. Patrick, but when we 
come to the period in which these eminent men flourished, 
which was at the close of the fifth and during the progress of 
the sixth century, the misstatements of these biographers will 
be clearly -and satisfactorily developed, 

Palladius is the first Christian Bishop whom the genuine 
annals of the Irish Church have upon record. — He landed in 
the year 431.* At that time the Pelagian heresy was making 
dreadful ravages all over the greater part of the Western 
world, and the heresiarch himself being a native of Britain, 
the infection, it appears, spread from the Continent, and was 
gradually gaining ground among the faithful in that country. 

Having in this place alluded to the land which gave birth 
to the heresiarch Pelagius, we shall now take the liberty of 
proceeding a little farther, and of instituting a brief inquiry 
into the opinions of some who seem anxious to make the 
Irish nation a present of this learned but unfortunate dogma* 

* Annals of laoisfallen, ad A, 43K— Prosper, Chron. A. 431. 



4 

tizer.* According to these writers, Pelagius was not a 
Briton — ^he was a native of Ireland. The only ancient 
authority, in fact, the only real authority on which this 
opinion is made to rest, appears to be a quotation or two 
taken from the prologue which St. Jerome has prefixed 
to his Commentaries on the Prophet Jeremiah.f The testi- 
mony of such an ancient and exalted witness, would, it 
is true, be an inyaluable acquisition to the cause which these 
writers have undertaken to maintain, provided the language 
which that Father has thought proper to employ, had been 
clear and unequivocal, and that there could be no doubt 

* AmoDg these writen we are reluctantly compelled to notice our learned country- 
man, Thomas Moore. The fervent love which that distinguished Irishman is known 
to have cherished for the ancient character of his native country, had, it would 
appear, been the predominant cause which led him into this literary tranegreasion. 
He has been, moreover mistaken in stating that Pelagius was a Monk of Bangor, 
near Carrickfergus, although this statement is somewhat modified by the terms, 
" little doubt." The Monastery of Bangor, near Carrickfergus, was not founded 
until the year 559, while Pelagius commenced his heresy A. D. 405. How could 
a man be said to have lived in a place which did not exist 1 See Mr* Moore*s His* 
tory of Ireland, vol. 1. p. 206, 208. 

t We shall give the quotations at large from St. Jerome : it will be found that in 
these extracts the name of Pelagius is not even mentioned. The prologue to the 
fint book has these words : — " Nee intelligit nimia stertens vecordia leges Commen- 
tariorum in quibus multe diversorum ponuntur opiniones vel tacitis vel expressb 
Auctorem nominibus, ut lectoris arbitrium sit quid potisnmum eligere debeat, de- 
cemere; quamquam et in primo ejusdem operis libro prefatus sim, me nee propria 
vel alienadicturum ; et ipsos Commentarios tarn veterum Scriptorum esse, quam nos- 
tros. Quod non videus frmcurtor ejm Grunniut olim nisus est carpere ; cui duobus 
libris, ubi qusB iste quasi sua profert, et alio jam calumniante purgata sunt \ ut 
prcteream contra Jovinianum volumina, in quibus dolet Virginitatem Nuptias diga- 
mis, digamiam polygamix esse praftlatam. Nee recordatur stolidissimus et SeoU)- 
rum fultihut pragravatus nos in ipsa dixisse opere, &c." 

The secood quotation from St. Jerome, taken from his prologue to the third book 
of his Commentaries oq the same Prophet, runs thus : — " Hie tacet, alibi crimina- 
tur ; mittit in Universum Orbem epistolas biblioias -, prius aureferas, nunc maledi- 
cas. — Ipseque mutus latrat per Alpinum canem grandem et corpulentum, et qui 
calcibus magis possit saevire quam dentibus. H&bet enim progenUm Scoticm gffittis, 
de Britannorum Vicinia, qui juxta fabulus Sectarum instar Cerberi Spirituali per- 
cutiendus est dava, ut eterno cum suo magistro Plutone sUentis conticescat." St* 
Hieron. L. 3. Com. &c. 



that PelagiuB was the person to whom ha had in reality 
alluded. — This, however, is not the case. — ^The name of 
Pelagius, or of may of his disciples, is never mentioned in 
any part of this quotation taken from St. Jerome; and indeed 
a fair and impartial reader, will, by examining the passage, 
discern at once the mist, the impenetrable obscurity by which 
it is encompassed. Hence it is, that Gamier, Vossius, and 
some few others, were of opinion, that St. Jerome alluded to 
Pelagius; while on the contrary. Usher, Martianay, Npris, 
and a host of others, insist that Celestius (who was most 
probably an Irishman) had been the individual against whom 
that Father, in such severe but just terms levels his attack. 
It is therefore most evident, that the two passages quoted 
from the work of St. Jerome are anything but clear and deci- 
sive, and that consequently his testimony on this subject only 
leaves the question still wrapt up in conjecture and uncer- 
tainty. Against this uncertainty and conjecture, let us now 
proceed to give a clear, explicit, and an unquestionable 
authority. Without recurring to those numerous writers who 
have been appealed to by Usher, we shall content ourselves 
with the testimony of onie very ancient and learned Father of 
the Church; a man who flourished in the days of Pelagius, 
and who from the very circumstance of the place in which he 
lived, must have been well acquainted with the difference 
between a Briton and a Scot, or Irishman. We allude to St. 
Prosper of Aquitain. — ^That ancient writer, in his Chran- 
ichj a work written for the express purpose of recording 
memorable events and notable characters, has these words: — 
"At this time (413,) Pelagius a Briton^ aided by Celestius and 
Julianus, advanced the doctrine which goes under the sanc- 
tion of his name, against the grQ,ce of Christ, and drew many 
persons into his error, &c."* Surely there is nothing obscure 

* The testimony of St. Prosper, in his Chronicon, ad. A. 413, is contained in 
these words : — " Hac tempestate Felagiut Brito, dogma nominis sui contra gratiam 
Christi, Coelestio et Juliano adjuvatoribus exeruit, multosque in suam traxit erro- 
rem ; prcdicans unnmquemque ad justiam voluntate propria regi, tantumque acci- 



in this testimony of our ancient Chronographer^ St. Prosper, 
and as has been already remarked, no writer of that age had 
a better opportunity of being correctly acquainted with the 
subject on which he treats. To this may be added a second 
evidence proceeding from the pen of the same venerable 
author. In his poem entitled "De Ingratis" — writing of 
Pelagius, he again distinctly styles him '^Britannus/' a native 
of Britain.* We, therefore, with good reason maintain that 
Pelagius was not an Irishman, but that, on the contrary, he 
was a native of Britain; and we maintain, moreover, and 
glory in the fact, that Ireland never yet produced an heresi- 
arch — never gave birth to the father of a heresy or a schism. 
To stem the progress of these pernicious doctrines of Pela- 
gius, the holy Bishops St. German of Auxerre, Lupus of 
Troyes, and others, were despatched by Pope Celestine to 
Britain. St. German was invested with legatine powers, and 
had directions for securing the ecclesiastical concerns of that 
people on a firm and permanent basis. During the course of 
their mission, the state of the Irish Christians, it may be 
reasonably supposed, came under the observation of these 
zealous functionaries; they became acquainted with the spiri* 
tual destitution under which the Christian part of the com- 
munity were suffering; they saw the moral darkness in which 

pere gratie qaantam meruit : quia Ads peccatum ipsum solum lesit, nee poaleros 
ejus obstrinzerit; Unde et voleudbus possibile tit omni carere peccato ; omnesque 
parvulos tarn insontes nasci, quam primus homo ante prtevaricationem fuit; nee ideo 
baptizandos, ut peecato exuantur, sed ut Sacramento adoptionis honorentur."— 
Chronieon, ad. A. 413. 



* " Dogma quod antiqui satiatum fele draconis 
Pestifero vomuit coluber sermone Britannut." 



Poem, da Ingratis. 



To theie, if necessary, might be superadded, the authority of numberless ancient 
and modem Ecclesiastical writers, all of whom mamtain that Pelagius had been a 
native of Britain. 



an ancient and an high-spirited people were envelopedi and 
accordingly on their return to Rome they failed not to submit 
to his Holiness an exact statement of what they had learned 
respecting Ireland. This it was which most probably induced 
Pope Celestine to appoint a Bishop who should preside over 
the Irish people, and take upon him the superintendance of 
their ecclesiastical affairs. 

Palladius, an Archdeacon of the Roman Church, and by 
birth a Briton, was the person selected for that important mis- 
sion, and having been consecrated Bishop, he set out for Ire- 
land, accompanied by four Priests, Sylvester, Solonius, Au- 
gustin, and Benedict.— He landed early in the year 431 in the 
district of Fohartha,* comprising the present barony of Forth, 
and not far from the site on which the town of Wexford now 
stands — ^the adjacent territory went at that period under the 
denomination of Hy-Garchon, of which Nathi the son of 
Garchon, a powerfiil and a wicked man, was the ruling 
prince. The short duration of this mission of Palladius, 
which continued but one year, leaves very little room for the 
notice of any interesting events. He certainly made a con- 
siderable number of converts in the territory of Hy-Garchon, 
which stretched along the coast from the barony of Forth to 
the north of the county of Wexford, comprehending Ukewise a 
great portion of the now county of Wicklow. It is also cer- 
tain, that he erected three Churches which were daily attended 
by the new converts, and in which the holy mysteries were 
celebrated — one was called Domnach-Arda, another Teach- 
na-Roman, or the house of the Romans, and the third Cell- 
fine, in which he deposited the sacred books and some reliques 
of SS. Peter and Paul, and of other saints, together with his 

* According to Marian Gorman the territory called the Fohartha was likewue 
known by the name of Hy-Garchoo, it comprehended seven districts, and 'com- 
prized a conaderable part of Leinster. — See also Colgan, A A. SS. p. 143. — The 
site on which the town of Wezfonl has been built was in the sontheni part of the 
Fohartha.— Archdall. 



8 

writing tablets; all of which were preserved in this church, 
and held in great veneration for years after the departure of 
Palladius,* At length the Pagan priests of this district 
alarmed at the success of the missionaries and encouraged by 
their friends and followers^ commenced a dreadful persecution 
against the Christians, and represented to Nathi that his ter- 
ritories were in imminent danger unless Palladius and his 
companions were instantly expelled the country. Nathi, 
whose superstition still surpassed his cruelty, obliged Palladius 
to quit Ireland— Sylvester and Solonius, however, remained 
in the country, and to their care he committed the small 
congregations he had formed. Palladius sailed from Ireland 
towards the end of the year 431. Having been tossed about 
by storms, he arrived at length in Britain, and died not long 
after at a place called Fordun in the district of Meams in 
Scotland.t Thus terminated the mission of Palladius. His 
labours in arresting the progress of Pelagianism both on the 
Continent and among his own countrymen in Britain, were 
truly great, and merit the encomiums of ancient writers; 
but in the sublime work of Ireland's conversion he appears 
to have laboured under many and considerable disadvan* 
tages. The conversion of a nation — ^the erection of the 
cross of Christ upon the altar of the Druid — the establish* 
ment of an Hierarchy in Ireland, that was to outlive the long 
and illustrious line of her monarchs, rolling on like the sun 
in the heavens amidst the darkness and tempests of the moral 
element, and acquiring a new brilliancy in its progress, 
despite of the power of man and the wreck of ages — this 
great supernatural work was reserved for another instrument, 
and under the protection of the God of heaven, it was splen- 

* These churchei were all in the territory now called the county of WicUow. 
Teach-na-Roman (Teachromham) is placed near the harbour of Wicklow — and 
from Domnach-arda, the village of Donard in the interior of the county, is said to 
have derived its name.^Archdall, Monast. Hib. 
t Fiech's Scholiast. 



9 

didly accomplished by the unwearied labours, preaching and 
miracles of the blessed and ever-revered Patrick, the glorious 
patron and illustrious apostle of Ireland. 

The missionary career of this great Saint, being as it were, 
the basis on which the whole weight of our ecclesiastical 
superstructure rests, it may not be improper to enter into an 
explicit and circumstantial detail of his life; noticing in par- 
ticular those leading and prominent transactions by which the 
reign of the Gospel had been established and his labours ulti- 
mately crowned with success. 

There exists a great diversity of opinion among our ancient 
as well as modem historians relative to the place of his 
birth — some assert that he had been bom in Pembrokeshire 
in Wales — others maintain that he was a Scotchman — while 
numerous writers of great reputed authority hold, that he 
received his birth in Armoric Gaul, and in that part of it 
which is now called Boulogne-sur-mer.* The first assertion, 
that he was a Welshman, is chimerical and absurd — the 
second opinion, that he was from Scotland, is a mere futile 
assertion — an empty hypothesis, unsupported by any genuine 
historical record, or even by what may be termed the frag- 
ments of sound, rational tradition — and the third and best 
opinion is, that he was born in Armoric Gaul, and near that 
part of it which is known by the name of Boulogne-sur-mer. 
This last opinion stands supported by the *' Confession," a 
work written by St. Patrick himself, and is further confirmed 
by the testimony of Fiech and other cotemporary authorities. 
"My Father," says the Saint, "was Calpornius a deacon, 
son of Potitus a priest, of the town Bonavem Tabernice; he 
had near the town a small villa Enon, where I became a cap- 
tive, "f Now that Bonavem Tabernise, or Tarabannae, which 
denote the same place, (^Seu Bon-avemX in regione Tarha- 

* 'Sullivan, Patriciana Decas, p. 4. t Confess, sub. init. 

X So called from its being situated at the mouth of a river ; hon mouth — *' aven," 
a river, in the Celtic language. — Diet. celt. 

B 



10 

neniij) is the Boulogne*sur-mer, now a sea-port town in 
Picardyy no man versed in ancient geography will deny. — 
Tabema or Tarabanna itself was an ancient city within a 
few miles of the present Boulogne, the ruins of which are 
still remaining under the modem name of Terouanne. — 
Gregory of Tours calls the inhabitants Tarabannenses. In 
fact, Boulogne and Tabemia were formerly one episcopal 
see* — and what flings the question beyond the bounds of 
controversy is, that there ia no place either in Wales or 
Scotland corresponding with the quotation which has been 
already given from the "Confession" of St Patrick.t There 
is, however, one portion of the ori^nal document of St 
Patrick which deserves particular notice: — "My Father," he 
says, "was Calpomius a deacon, son of Potitus a priest." — 
Now from his Father being a deacon, and the son of a priest, 
it is very natural to suppose, that Christianity was generally 
difiused, and well understood in the country where his parents 
lived. But this undoubtedly could not be said of Scotland, 
which in the fifth century lay still immersed in all the dark- 
ness of long proscribed polytheism. The more consistent 
opinion therefore, is, that St. Patrick was a native of Armoric 
Gaul, and was bom near the place where Boulogne-sur-mer 
at present stands. The year of his nativity (though also a 
disputed question among our antiquarians,) must be set down at 
387.J: About that period, Nial of the nine hostages, who was 
an enterprizing and an ambitious monarch, had made several 
incursions into Gaul, sometimes to gratify his ambition, and 
very often in compliance with the prevailing custom of the 
times. On one of these occasions he brought into captivity 
a great number of the inhabitants, among whom was Patrick, 

* Jonas in Vit. Eustasii. 
t Lanigan in his Ecclesiastical history enters into a very critical and learned dis- 
sertation on this point, in which the attention and study of the curious, would be 
amply gratified. 

X Tillcmont— Mem. S. Patr. T. 16.— See Lanigan, c. 4. 



11 

and who was then in the sixteenth year of his age. His 
master's name was Milcho, an opulent man, residing in that 
part of Dalaradia, which is now comprised within the county 
of Antrim,* It seems that Patrick when a boy had been 
very negligent in the great duties of religion, but the austeri- 
ties which he was obliged to undergo in his servitude, soon 
brought him to a knowledge of himself and to an ardent 
desire of serving and pleasing his God. We find him, there- 
fore, during his occupation in tending the flocks of his 
master, consecrating his hours of solitude to prayer, and 
estranging himself from the intercourse of man, in order the 
more effectually to enjoy the converse and love of his maker. 
It is stated that he was wont to repeat an hundred prayers 
by day, and the same number with additional devotiops du- 
ring the solitude of the night. It grieved him to see his 
master (who it appears, had been a rigid man,) and the whole 
population of the country buried in the gloom of paganism, 
ignorant of the God that made them — ignorant of the great 
works that surrounded them, and ignorant of themselves. — 
After having continued six years in captivity,t he tells us 
that one night he heard, while asleep, a voice announcing to 
him — ^^ Patrick, thou fastest well and soon shalt thou go to 
thine own country — ^behold a ship is ready for thee." Patrick 
obeying the summons left Milcho*s residence, although it is 
likely he never at the time considered the grand design which 
Providence had in view, and for which he was ultimately 
destined. "And I came," says the Saint, "in the power of 
the Lord who directed my course towards a good end, and I 
was under no apprehension, until I arrived where the ship 
was. It was then clearing out, and I called for a passage. 
But the master of the vessel got angry and said to me; do 
not attempt to come with us. On hearing this I retired, for 
the purpose of going to the cabin where I had been received 

• Confess, p. 6. f Probus, L. I. c. 3 



12 

as a guest, and on my way thither I began to pray — but 
before I had finished my prayer, I heard one of the men 
crying out with a loud voice after me, come quickly for they 
are calling you — and immediately I returned: and they said 
to me; come we receive thee on faith; be our friend just as it 
may be agreeable to you. We then set sail, and after three 
days reached land."* The two Breviaries of Rheims, to- 
gether with Fiech's hymn and the Scholiast tell us, that the 
men with whom our Saint embarked were merchants from Gaul, 
and that they landed in a place called Treguier in Britany, 
some distance from the town in which he had been bom. 

The year in which he reached his native place may be 
stated at 410. It was at this time that St. Patrick now in 
his* twenty-second year, had formed the resolution of embrac- 
ing the ecclesiastical state. For this purpose he retired to 
the celebrated monastery or collie of his relative St. Martin 
of Tours, which for discipline and literature obtained at the 
time an high rank in the Christian world. In this retreat of 
piety and learning he continued for four years, advancing in 
the knowledge not only of speculative truths, but moreover 
in the daily and consta.nt practice of those important and 
sublime virtues recommended by the Gospel. Having then 
retired for a season to visit his parents. Providence so dis- 
posed that he was made a captive a second timcf This 
second captivity of St. Patrick was of short continuance, and 
immediately after his liberation he was favoured with another 
vision, in which the grand event for which he had been destined 
(the conversion of Ireland) was fully unfolded to him. — His 
own words are: — "I saw in a nocturnal vision, a man coming 
as if from Ireland, whose name was VictoriciuSj with imiu- 
merable letters, one of which he handed to me; on reading 
the beginning of it, I found it contained theee words — * The 
voice of the Irish.' And while reading I thought I heard at 

♦ Confess, p. 7. t Probus, L. 1. c. 14. 



13 

the same moment, the voice of persons from near the wood 
Focluty* which is near the western sea. And they cried out 
as if with one voice: * We entreat thee holy youth to come and 
walk 'Still cunongst us* And I was greatly affected in my 
hearty and could read no longer; then I awoke." *t Soon 
after this, and at the age of thirty, he put himself under the 
direction of St. German of Auxerre. There had been at that 
time several religious and learned establishments in the island 
of Lerins.J To this island, the reputation of which stands 
high in antiquity, Patrick was directed by his friend St. 
German, and continuing in it for a period of nine years,^ he 
derived that knowledge of sacred literature and of spiritual 
discipline, which afterwards enabled him to proceed as an 
apostle and to triumph over the darkness in which a great 
and a magnanimous people had been for ages involved. 
When St. Patrick retired from Lerins, he might have been in 
the thirty-ninth year of his age. He remained for a short 
time with his director St. German, after which he returned to 
Boulogne for the purpose of visiting his parents and friends. 
It was at this period that St. German and St. Lupus of 
Troyes were deputed by Pope Celestine to visit Britain, and 
endeavour to stem the progress of the pelagian heresy in that 
country. They travelled through Boulogne, and as the Scho- 
liast tells us, invited St. Patrick to accompany them. It was 
likewise at the termination of this mission that Palladius was 
consecrated. It must be observed, that St. Patrick had at 
this period been directed to proceed to Rome, in company 
with Segetius a priest, having been furnished at the same 
time with letters of recommendation from St. German. He 
met with a most favourable reception from Celestine, who 



• In Tirawley, county of Mayo ; the ancient Tir Amalgaid. — Scholiast, 
t Conf. p. 9. 

X Now called St. Honorat, situated between the coasts of Italy and France. — 
Bollandists, Com. ad V. S. P. 
$ Third Life, c. 22. 



14 

then sat in the chair of St. Peter, and was readily chosen to 
accompany and assist Palladius on his intended mission to 
Ireland."*^ This mission, as has been already noticed, was 
but of short continuance. Upon the death of Palladius, 
Patrick received the regular missionary powers from the sole 
divinely established source of spiritual jurisdiction on earth; 
the head of the Churchf — at that time also, Pope Celestine. 
He left Rome early in the year 432, and was consecrated by 
the venerable Amator,J a prelate of great sanctity, then 
residing in the neighbourhood of Eboria.§ The statement of 
Jocelin and other writers, respecting the number of his com- 
panions, rests on no good authority; it is however certain 
that Auxilius and I8erninu8,\\ two priests of great zeal and 
piety were selected to accompany him, and had some years 
after been promoted to the episcopacy by our Saint himself. 

In the year 432 St Patrick landed in Ireland; Celestine 
was then dead and was succeeded by Sixtus the third. It is 
generally supposed that the harbour in which the Saint 
landed was situated in the present county of Wicklow; by 
some writers it is called Inbher-de, that is, the mouth of the 
river De, at present the river Leitrim.f^ On his landing, he 
met with immediate opposition from the inhabitants; a cir- 
cumstance which can be well accounted for, in consequence of 
its proximity to the territory of the Hy-Garchon, from which 
Palladius had been already so lately repulsed. Patrick hav- 
ing been well acquainted with the localities of the country, 

* Erric, de vita S. Germ. — fourth life. 

t That St. Patrick derived his mission from the See of Rome.— Vide Appendix 1 . 
p. 2. 

X Probos, L. 1. c 25. — Second, third and fourUi lives. 

§ A town situated in the north-west of Oaul, and most probably the same as £v- 
reux in Normandy. 

II They are said to have received holy orders on the same day that St. Patrick was 
consecrated. — Second life, c. 26. 

IT See Colgan's commentary on the par tut Evolenorum of Probus. — Second life, 
e. 25.— Third life, c. 28.— Jocelin, cap. 29, 



15 

did not,' it is probablci determine on Wicklow as his favourite 
landing place. Accordingly on the resistance of the people, 
he set out to sea and directing his course towards the North, 
(the scene of his former bondage,) arrived with his compa- 
nions at a port in a district now called the barony of Lecale, 
in the county of Down. Having advanced some distance into 
the country, they met with a body of men who were in the 
service of Dicho, the lord and proprietor of that territory. — 
These men at first supposed them to be robbers, and having 
acquainted their master, Dicho came out with a body of his 
armed servants for the purpose of exterminating them. The 
Almighty however touched his heart, and Patrick was invited 
in^to his house. Here the Saint had an opportunity of unfold- 
ing the great truths of the Gospel — Dicho became a Christian 
and was baptized,t and thus was he the first convert whom 
St. Patrick had made to the religion of Christ in Ireland. 
Soon after his conversion, Dicho erected a church on his 
estate, known by the denomination of Sabhall Padruic or 
PatricVs harnj and all his family and dependants became 
Christians. The road was now opened for the Gospel and 
every encouragement afforded to our holy missionaries! Ac- 
cordingly the Saint after remaining a short time at the house 
of Dicho, set out by land to visit his former master Milcho, 
in the county of Antrim. This man was, it appears, a most 
obstinate pagan, and Patrick foreseeing that his labours would, 
at least for the present, be ineffectual, directed his course 
through the whole north-west of the county of Down and 
the adjacent districts; gaining multitudes of converts in his 
progress and laying the proud superstition of the Druids 
prostrate at the foot of the cross. Among these converts 
were Russ the son of Trichem, and a youth named Mochoe 
whom he afterwards educated for the ecclesiastical state, and 
who in 496 governed as Bishop a church at Antrim. 

t Probus, L. I. c. 28. 



16 

The festival of Easter was now approaching and St. Patrick 
was determined to hoW its celebration near Tarah where the 
Monarch and Princes of the Kingdom were at that time 
assembled in convocation.* St. Peter planted the cross of 
Christ in the imperial city of Rome, and St. Patrick, another 
Apostle, resolved to proclaim the mysteries of the same cross 
at the seat of government and before the united assembly of 
the nation. 

The present county of Meath together with the greater 
part of Westmeath was in the fifth century, the residence of 
kings, princes and warriors. In the year of the Christian 
era seventy-nine, Tuathal, the reigning monarch of Ireland, 
after successive victories over the Albanians, and over domes- 
tic enemies, summoned a general convocation of his princes 
and nobility to Tarah. In this national assembly, Tuathal 
took a tract of land from each of the four provinces, and in 
each portion a magnificent palace was erected. These four 
tracts formed the county of Meath; now divided into Meath 
and Westmeath. In the portion taken from Munster, he 
built the royal seat of Flachtga. In the tract selected from 
the province of Connaught, a second palace was erected," in 
which the general convocation of the kingdom was held, 
usually called Visneach. The third royal seat was Tailten, 
in a territory originally belonging to Ulster. But the palace 
of Tarah itself was reserved for the Monarch, and at stated 
times, the provincial kings with their warriors, antiquarians, 
poets and druids, were bound to assemble there and institute 
such laws as the moral and political state of the country 
might seem to require.f 

St. Patrick and his companions pursuing their journey 
from Colp, the mouth of the Boyne, to the plain of 
Breg, in which the city of Tarah was situated, went to the 
house of a respectable man named Seschnen by whom they 
were hospitably entertained. The result of this visit was the 

* Trias Thaumatur. p. 20. t Keating, V. 2. 



17 

conversion of Seschen and his family, among whom we must 
notice his son Benign^s* who accompanied the Saint to 
Tarah and became afterwards his favourite disciple and his 
successor in the see of Armagh. On Easter eve the Saint 
and his companions arrived within view of the hill of Tarah. 
Here he pitched his tent and lit up the paschal fire, a cere- 
mony in those primitive times prevalent among Christians, 
and observed in memory of the resurrection of Christ. Leo- 
gaire was then Monarch of Ireland — he was the son of Nial 
of the nine hostages, and agreeably to the usage of his pre- 
decessors, kept his court in the palace of Tarah. It happened 
that the King and his Princes were at this very time celebrat- 
ing an annual festival ;t and in compliance with the rites of 
the druidical worship, that eve was observed with Superior 
religious solemnity. The ancient Irish, as we have observed, 
worshipped the sun; that luminary was considered by them 
as their principal and supreme deity. Hence fire-worship was 
the leading dogma in the system of Irish druidism. By a 
standing law, all the fires of the country were on that eve to 
be extinguished, and no person was allowed under pain of 
death to kindle a fire, until the sacred one should be first 
lighted up by the Druids on the hill of Tarah, a ceremony 
which was to serve as a signal for the rest of Ireland.J St. 
Patrick, however, lit up his paschal fire, and when it was 
seen firom the heights of Tarah, Leogaire with his princes and 
chieftains was astonished and alarmed. He inquired, who it 
might be, who dared to rise up in opposition to the law and 
to the religion of the country, and being informed by the 
Magi, that it had been done by the new Christian teachers 
and if not extinguished would bring destruction on his realms, 
the Monarch accompanied by his officers came down from 
Tarah and advanced to the place where the Saint and his 
companions had been. The King and his followers having 

• Third life, c. 36. t Probus, L. l.c.35. t Second life, c. 34.— Probus, L. 1. c. 35. 

C 



18 

rested at a certain distance from the paschal fire, messengers 
were despatched to convey the Saint into the royal presence, 
and orders were given that no respect should be paid him. — 
However, on St. Patrick presenting himself before them. 
Here, the son of Digo, notwithstanding the command of the 
King, rose up and saluted him, and receiving his benediction 
became a convert* Some years after he viras consecrated 
Bishop of Slane and was noted for zeal, learning and sane* 
tity.* The conference, which on this occasion took place 
between St. Patrick and Leogaire, is so interwoven with un- 
attested and incredible anecdote, that it might perhaps be as 
well passed over, in order to come to the following day 
(Easter Sunday,) when our Saint made his first and solemn 
entrance into the palace of Tarah. On the morning com- 
memorative of the resurrection of Christ, we find for the 
first time the Gospel and the mysteries of the Redeemer pub- 
licly proclaimed through the halls of Tarah. In the presence 
of the Monarch and his princes, chieftains and druids the 
cross of Christ was raised, and its truths demonstrated and 
established. ^'You worship the sun," said St. Patrick, ''and 
you adore that light; it is however but a mere creature — that 
sun which we see, rises daily, for our use by the command of 
"the Almighty, but its splendour shall not always endure — the 
day will come when its light will be extinguished, and all 
those who worship it shall miserably perish; but we adore the 
true Sunt — Christ the Lord and Ruler of all things." On 
this occasion, Dubtach, the most eminent of the Poets, arose 
and greeting St. Patrick, became a Christian. His example 
was followed by numbers and among them may be ranked 
Fingar the son of King Clito, who afterwards suffered mar- 
tyrdom in Britany. J The bias of education — of rooted pre- 
judice and strengthened habits is singularly powerful — St. 
Patrick announced his doctrine with such conviction and 

• Probus, L. 1. c. 37. t Conf, c. 22. t Colgan, Acta Sanctorum, Feb. 23, 



19 

power that neither prince or priest was able to resist him, 
and yet Leogaire the Monarch was not converted. That he 
became a Christian has been asserted by some writers, but 
there appears no sufficient authority for this statement. At 
all events, the Saint received permission from the King to 
preach the Gospel, on condition that the peace of the king- 
dom should not be disturbed. 

On the following day, St. Patrick repaired to Tailten where 
the public games were celebrated, and which national amuse- 
ments were generally honoured by the presence of the whole 
court of Tarah. Here, likewise, he multiplied the number of 
his converts^ Conall, a brother of the King, heard his doc- 
trine, believed and was baptized.* St. Patrick after having 
continued during Easter week in the territory of Tarah went 
forth oA his mission through other parts of the county of 
Meath. Having erected a church at Drumconrath in the now 
barony of Slane, and also at Drumshallon near Brogheda, 
he directed his course to Delvin, and thence to the celebrated 
hill of Usneagh, reducing, as we are informed, the whole 
mass of the people in subjection to the cross of Christ, Pur- 
suing his route through Longford, he proceeds towards the 
North for the purpose p( destroying the idol Cratn^cruachyf 
standing in a plain near Feanagh in the county of Leitrim. 
By his prayers, the idol was laid prostrate, and on the spot 
a celebrated church was erected over which he placed Mauran, 
sumamed Bardan. 

The next scene of his mission was the province ^of Con- 
naught. It would be a difficult and an endless task to accom- 
pany our Apostle, step by step, through every distinct quarter 
where, his zeal and the advancement of the Gospel had con- 
veyed him. The .history of the churches which he erected, 

♦ Fourth life, c. 52. 

t Tripartite, L. 2.TS. 31.— "Heap of the sim"— Cruach, an beap, and Crom, 
an ancient name for the God of fire. 



20 

and the list of holy and learned men whom he converted in 
Connaught alone^ would supply abundant materials for the 
admirer of sacred and biographical subjects. 

Having crossed the Shannon near Drumsnare^ he converted 
the two daughters of the Monarch Leogaire — Ethnea and 
Fethlimia, together with the Druids Mael and Capiat^ under 
whose tutelage these ladies had been placed. The history of 
their conversion having opened a way to many important 
events, and being moreover universally acknowledged by our 
ancient writers, may very justly demand a place in this 
analysis. When St. Patrick had advanced some distance 
into Connaught, he stopped with his fellow-missioners at a 
fountain near the royal residence Cruachan, now Croghan, at 
Elphin. At the break of day the Saint and his companions 
began to chaunt the Matins, and the Princesses coming at 
the same hour to bathe in the fountain, were struck with the 
singular appearance of persons clothed in white garments, 
with books in their hands and singing aloud the praises of 
the Most High. "Who are ye," said they — "belong ye to 
the air, to the heavens, or to the earth?'* St. Patrick ac- 
cordingly explained to them the nature and attributes of the 
only one true God: and they asked him, "where does your 
God dwell, is it in the sun, or on the earth, on moimtains, 
in vallies, in tlie sea or in rivers; is he rich, is he young or 
old, has he sons and daughters, and are they handsome?" 
The Apostle with feelings of pity for the ignorance and sim- 
plicity of these noble females, and knowing^ well that the 
hand of Providence had guided them imperceptibly to the 
spot, took an opportunity of unfolding at large the whole 
grand system of revelation — ^the fall of man and his ultimate 
redemption by the sufferings and atonement of Christ. — 
Pleased and delighted with his discourse they wished to know 
how they could be acceptable to him who at the moment was 
invisibly moving their hearts. The Saint gave the required 
instruction; they believed, were baptized in the fountain. 



21 

and afterwards conBecrating their virginity to God, died holy 
virgins — immaculate spouses of Christ.* 

From this place^ St. Patrick proceeded towards the terri- 
tory of Hua-Nolella, now the county of Sligo, and left there 
his disci}de Cethenus. From thence he advanced to Oran in 
Roscommon, where he assigned situations for a number of 
Gallic priests, who on hearing of the success of St. Patrick, 
fled for refuge to Ireland, and spent the remainder of their 
days in monastic retirement. We find him next at Mag- 
Seola near Elphin, where he held a synod, and among the 

, persons present are named Felartus and Sacellus of Baslisk, 
in Roscommon. Passing Lough-Gara in Sligo, and the ter- 
ritory of Airteach where he established churches, he next 
proceeds to the now barony of Costello in the county of 
Mayo, and afler bringing over the whole population of that 

. district to the faith, he ordained priests to preside over them, 
among whom may be mentioned Loarn of Costello, Conan 
of Curragh and Senachus of Aghagower. His next mission 
was to the extensive district of Tirawley. The King of this 
martial territory was just deceased and left behind him seven 
sons, whose match in the field of battle it were difficult to 
find. It happened that on the arrival of St. Patrick, a 
solemn festival had being celebrating. The Saint advanced 
in the midst of the people, raised the cross of Christ and 
preached its mysteries. The seven Princes were converted, 
and, as all our annalists inform us, twelve thousand inhabit- 
ants.t The extraordinary progress which St. Patrick had now 
made in the work of the Gospel, brought down on him the 
hostiUty and persecution of the whole druidical priesthood of 
the country. The Saint assures us that at this period his life 
was in danger, but Enda one of those converted princes, and 
his son Conall protected him, and were the happy instruments 

• Triapartite, L. 2. c. 44. 
t Triapartitei L. 2. c. 77.— Usher, p. 865, 



22 

in saving him whom Providence^ in its nnsearchable decrees, 
had destined for the fiuther execution of its own grand 
designs.* Our Apostle next crossed the Moy and entered 
the territory of Tireragh in Sligo where he baptized seven 
brothers, one of whom' Mac-erca he selected for the priest- 
hood; when duly qualified and ordained, he placed him over 
the church of Kilroe, situated within a mile of Killala. He 
next directed his course towards the south-west of the pro- 
vince — ^and by his preaching and wonderful signs, the cause of 
truth prevails and the Gospel continues triumphant. The 
number of churches which St. Patrick erected during the 
seven years of his apostolic labours in the province of Con- 
naught are variously stated by our antiquarians — some go as 
far as one thousand; but although this cannot be easily 
credited, yet one thing is certain, that the province of Con- 
naught was no longer a land of idolatry: its brave and its 
ancient people believed in the Gospel; and to this day that 
same belief continues, notwithstanding the grinding, unmer* 
cifiil persecutions which the same noble and hospitable pro* 
vince has for centuries been destined to endure. 

It has been already observed that St. Patrick's mission in 
the north of Ireland was but of short continuance. In the 
year 442 we find him preaching the Gospel in Tirconnell, 
(county of Donegal,) and after having converted Owen, a 
dynast of that country, the Apostle proceeded through the 
great district of the Dalrieda. Traversing along by Ghsiura,1- 
Imclair and the now county of Tyrone, he advances into the 
ancient Dalaradia.j: In this powerful territory, multitudes 
embraced the faith, and both churches and religious commu-- 
nities were established. In short, the extraordinary conver- 

* Probus, L. 2. c. 23. f South of Lough-neagh. 

X The Dalrieda comprehended the north-west and south of the county of Antrim. 
The Dalaradia comprized the cast of the same county, together with the county of 
Down.— Harris, Antiq. p. 48. 



23 

810118 he had made, the obstacles which he overthrew, the easa 
with which that overthrow was effected, and the effectual 
grand issue of his mission up to this period, presented to the 
Saint a demonstrative conviction, that he alone was the per- 
son destined by heaven for the moral liberation of the 
countiy — for the salvation of a people, whose conversion was 
prompt and sincere, and in whose virtues might be recognized 
all the lustre and glory of the apostolic times. . 

St. Patrick had not as yet proceeded to the great and 
powerful province of Munster, which at that time compre- 
hended the noble territories of Thomond to the north and of 
Desmond to the south. However, before he embarked on 
this mission he visited Slane and other favourite quarters in 
Meath, to which of course, he had a predilection, and where, 
it is said, he established a number of religious houses. On his 
departure he left his disciple Secundinus (who by this time had 
been ordained Bishop) in care of the church of Dunshaghlin, 
with powers also over the new congregations in Meath, and 
over a great portion of the North.* Proceeding on his jour- 
ney to Munster our Saint deemed it necessary to visit several 
districts of Leinster, and even those parts of it where Chris- 
tianity had been established by Palladius. He baptized the 
Princes lUand and Alind in a fountain near Naa6,t and so 
extraordinary was the zeal of the people, that it is said many 
of the leading men in that neighbourhood offered their services 
and thought it an honour to be employed in the erection of 
churches. Having passed through Hy-Grarchon, he entered 
the territory of MaghUffe, the present county of Kildare, in 
which he placed his companions Auxilius, Bishop at Killossy 
near Naas, and Iseminus Bishop at Kilcullen.j: Directing 
his course from thence through Leix, now part of the 
Queen's county, where multitudes embraced the faith, St. 
Patrick next proceeds to visit his friend Dubtach the poet, 

* Tripartite, L. 3. c. 98. t Usher, Ind. Chron. t Colgan, Trip. L. 3. c. 18. 



24 

who lived in that part of the territory of Hy-Kinsellagh now 
called the county of Carlow. * The Saint already acquainted 
with the wisdom and religious sentiments of Dubtach, hegged 
of him to mention a person, who, he thought, might be 
calculated for the ecclesiastical state. On this occasion he 
presented his pupil Fiech, of the illustrious house of Hy- 
Bairrche in Leinster; St. Patrick finding him duly qualified, 
gave him the clerical tonsure and took him under his special 
care and protection. He was the first native of Leinster who 
had been raised to the episcopacy — his see was in Sletty* in 
the Queen's county and on the borders of the county of 
Carlow. Fiech was a regular member of the bardic order, a 
poet by profession, esteemed as a learned man even before he 
had embraced Christianity, and during his episcopacy was 
consulted by numbers as an oracle of truth and of heavenly 
wisdom. From Hy-Kinsellagh, St. Patrick advanced into 
Ossory, where he erected many churches and converted a 
vast multitude of the inhabitants. Having now (A. D. 446) 
reached the borders of Munster, our Saint proceeds to Cashel, 
the royal seat of the kings of that province. On his approach- 
ing the city, the celebrated Aengus, then King of Munster, 
a young Prince of great piety and knowledge, came forth to 
meet him.t He invited St. Patrick into his palace, and on 
the following day both Aengus and the nobility of his court 
became Christians. A circumstance occurred at the baptism 
of this Prince, which gave rise to the well-known anecdote 
of the King's foot having been pierced by the staff of St. 
Patrick. The Tripartite states, that after the baptism and at 
the Saint's giving the blessing, the sharp point of the crozier 
pierced through his foot.J The King considering it a part of 
the ceremony, patiently submitted to the pain for a consider- 
able time, upon which St. Patrick pronounced a becoming 

• Scholiast— Tripartite, L. 3. c. 21. t Ibid. c. 29. 

t Jocelin, c. 74.— Tripartite, L, 3, c. 30. 



26 

eulogittm, and foretold the great progress which the Gospel 
would make under the fostering protection of this pious 
Prince. 

It is hi^Iy probable that a knowledge of the Christian 
rdigion had before this period gained some ground in the 
eastern and southern parts of Munster. However, the 
fSEunous territory of Thomond and the whole w^tem coast 
lay still buried in all the darkness of paganism. The name 
of the celebrated tribe of the Dalgais, will continue for ever 
illustriously recl^rded; but notwithstanding their martial hero- 
ism and their many moral virtues, this ancient and spirited 
-people knew neither the cause whence they proceeded nor 
the important and noble end for which they had been des* 
tined. St. Patrick now preaches amongst them, and it is 
said, that the whole sept ahnost instantaneously became 
Christians: at all events, one fact is certain, that the Gospel 
had made a rapid progress in their territory, and that when 
once converted to Christ, this powerful tribe became as re- 
markable for their attachment to the faith as they had ever 
been for their well-known fidelity to their prince, theit pro- 
verbial love for the land of their birth, and their matchless 
heroism in the field of battle. After having erected and con<» 
secrated churches in this great district, we next find our 
Apostle preaching the faith of Christ along the extensive 
territory of Thomond. When he entered the district of 
Ormond, Lonan its chieftain hospitably entertained him, and 
embracing Christianity became an instrument for the imme- 
diate conversion of that renowned territory.* Vast multi- 
tudes crossed the Shannon, from north Munster (Clare,) 
anxious to see St. Patrick and hear the words of truth from 
his own lips: this countless multitude are said to have been 
baptized in the field of Tir-glais (the green field.) All the 
neighbouring princes, and persons of influence in the country 

• Third life, c. 61. 



26 

came to hear his doctrine and witness his power; and on his 
departure, having, according to the Tripartite, ascended 
mount Fintine near Donaghmore and casting his eyes over 
the rich and beautiful country of Thomond, he blessed it 
nnd foretold the birth of the celebrated Senan of Inniscatty.* 
Afterwards the Saint directed his course to the district of 
Luachra near the borders of Kerry; where he prc^hesied, 
that '^St. Brendan of the race of Hua-Alta, the great patri* 
arch of monks and the star of the Western world, would be 
bom, and that his birth would take place several years afker 
his own death/^t He next traversed the r^on of Desmond 
(Cork,) and the country of the Desii (Waterfbrd,):( establish*- 
ing the cross of Christ and bringing the great mass of the 
people under its subjection^ The mission of St. Patrick in 
Munster continued for seven years. It would be difficult to 
form an estimate of the number of converts which he had 
made, or even of the churches and religious establishments 
which he founded. The annals of Ireland are crowded with 
facts setting forth the heroism, the hospitality and natural 
intelligence of this fine people; while the bravery which they 
exhibited in the field of battle, the gcfnerostty which they 
practised in their own homes, and the mental fire, the intelli* 
gence and vivacity for which they had been distinguished 
were altogether but so many mediums for the more easy con-> 
version, and unshaken persevering stability of this ancient, 
renowned and proverbially spirited people* 

St. Patrick departed from Munster in the year 452, and pass* 
ing through Brosna, in the King's county, where he erected 
several churches, pursued his mission until he arrived at Lecale, 
the place in which he made his first convert, and which was ever 
after his favourite retreat. Having now spent twenty years 
in his arduous and extraordinary mission through the wilds 
and desarts of the kingdom, spreading around the light of 

t Tripartite^ L. 3. c. 46. t Id. c 47. t Id. c 49. 



27 

Christianity, and by his preaching and stupendous miraclesy 
patting a period to the long dismal feign of superstition, 
SL Patrick determines on erecting a metropolitan see. For 
this purpose he proceeds (according to the directions of a 
vision,) to the territory of Macha, where stood the royal city 
of Emania, then the residence of the Kings of Ulster. Here 
he was kindly received by Dair^ an opulent man, who gave 
him a grant of a convenient spot of ground on an eminence, 
called DruimreaUeek, (the hill of sallows,) and upon this site 
the Saint erected his Cathedral.*. This high ground is that 
on which the city of Ard-Macha,t or Armagh now stands, 
and here the ecclesiastical metropolis of Ireland was estab- 
lished A. D. 4564 Suitable edifices were annexed to it for 
the accommodation of the clergy, and adjacent to it were 
several religious retreats in which numbers of both sexes for- 
saking the world, made a sacrifice of all to the great Author 
of their existence. The remaining years of our Saint's life 
were spent at his see in Aimagh, and occasionally at his 
favourite retreat of Sabhul or Saul. The wonderful power of 
the Most High was now visibly displayed through the instru- 
mentality of this great Apostle — consecrated churches, mo- 
nastic foundations, and houses of education covered the 
whole face of the country; the infant congregations were 
organized and placed under the government of holy prelates 
and learned pastors, all sul^ect to the metropolitan see of 
Armagh—-in short a regular hierarchy-^a perfectly national 
church was established; while the zeal and sanctity of the 
people elicited the admiration of distant nations, and the coun- 
try which' they inhabited was universally known by the splen- 
did appellation' of a holy land and an island of saints. At t}u8 
period, (466) St. Patrick held two synods in which many dis- 
ciplinary and salutary laws relating to morals and church 

* Probus, L. 3. c 7. t The hill of the territory called Madia. 

X Colsan, Ind, Cbron. A. A. S.S.-— Ware Bishops. 



28 

government were instituted.* The first of these synods is en- 
titled, exclusively the synod of St. Patrick; the second bears 
the title of the synod of Bishops, that is, of Patrick, Auxi* 
lius, and Iseminus. — ^^^Synodus Episcoporum, id esty Potiitii, 
Anxilii, et Isemini." It is evident from the Canons of ihe 
former, that some of them had been introduced at a perioiA 
much later than the fifth century, and had, it is probable^ 
been arranged at some national councils held in another 
country. The Canons of the latter are with a few exceptions 
universally received as authentic, and were undoubtedly 
passed in the synod to which we have already alluded^i-* 

Of the writings of St. Patrick which remain the only 
genuine ones are his letter to Coroticus, a British pjiffce, 
and the celebrated work entitled his Confession.^ The cruelty 
exercised by Coroticus towards the Irish converts, numbers 
of whom he put to death or sold as slaves, forms the subject 
of the above-mentioned letter: for these crimes the Saint 
pronounces him publicly excommunicated. The Confession 
\ was written by St. Patrick, when he felt his dissolution 
iqiproaching. His object in writing it was, to point out the 
extraordinary manner in which the Almighty had assisted 
Um from the commencement of his mission until its grand 
and successful termination. At length the great design hav-* 
ing being accomplished, for which a merciful and an all-ruling 
Providence had destined this wonderful Saint, the moment is 
approaching, when he is to be summoned to meet his Lord 
and receive the reward of his labours. St. Patrick himself 
had a foreknowledge of this event; and wishing to breathe^ 
his last and leave his mortal remains in the ecclesiastical 
metropolis of Ireland, he departed from Saul in which place 
he then resided. It is related that on his way. he was stepped 
by an angel and ordered to return; however, he did return to 

• Jocclin, c. 1(>8, — Spelman, Con. T. 1. p. 62. 

t TiUemont, Mem. Tom. xvi. p. 786.— Wirkins, Con. T. 1. p. 2. 

t Probw, L. 2. c. 36.— Fiecb, s. 27, 



29 

Saul and having been attended by TaBsach, bishop of Rath« 
colphtha, near Down^ and recemng from him the holy Via- 
ticum^ his happy soul retired from this world to enjoy the 
glory of hi&. Saviour, on Wednesday the 17th of March, in 
the 78th year of his age, and in the year of our Lord 466.* 
Some writers have endeavoured to maintain that the number 
of his years amounted to one hundred and twenty, and from 
this and other principles draw a line of comparison between 
St Patrick and Moses; it is however quite clear, that their 
calculations cannot stand the test of chronological criticism, 
and upon a full and fair inquiry, it will be found that the 
order of time already stated is that which alone corresponds 
with the whole series of events, and with the testimony of the 
best and most approved antiquarians. Equally groundless is 
the assertion of those who pretend that St. Patrick was a 
Canon Regular of St. Augustine. There was no such order 
at that time in the Christian Church; nor was it known in 
Ireland until the days of St. Malachy in the twelfth century .+ 
. The news of the Saint's death having been spread through- 
out all Ireland, the prelates and clergy flocked in multitudes 
from the most remote quarters of the country, and the 
funeral obsequies were celebrated with unusual pomp. As 
the bishops and priests arrived at Saul, each clergyman pro- 
ceeded according to his dignity to offer up the divine mysteries 

* Annals of Innis&llen. 
' t The i^ipeUatioii of Canon was originally given to all such clergymen as Lad their 
names placed on the canon or roll of a church. It was, in lapse of time, appropri- 
ated to those who lived in community — and inasmuch as they were hound to observe 
certain canons or rules relative to their institution, tliey were generally called Canon$ 
lU^tor.— Bingham, 3« 1. c. 6.— Fkury, Inst. Part 1. 

In the deventh century some conmuinities of clergymen adopted certain refiTvlf^tkins 
which had been drawn up by St. Augustine for a nunnery over which his sister had 
presided. These rules titer undergoing some alterations, were adapted to commu* 
Bities of men, and the persons who observed them, were known by the name of 
'* Canons Regular of St, Augustine" These Canons bound themselves by vows— yet 
had the privilege of forming diocesan chapters, and were employed in the cure of 
souls : during the twelfth and following centuries they became very numerous in 
Ireland.— See Gilbert, Corpus, Jur« Can, tit. xiii. re^* 3.— -Sec also chap. xii. & xiii. 



30 

in commemoration of their Apostle, and hence the fmieral 
service was kept up for several days. Besides the celebration 
of the Masses and other duties of the day; the Psalmody, 
the chaunting of hymns and the divine office were continued 
during the night, and the profusion of torches and lights was 
so great, that, (to use the words of an ancient writer) the 
darkness was expelled, and the whole night seemed to be one 
day.* In the simple and ancient language of Fiech's hymn, 
it is compared to the long day caused by the standing of the 
sun for Joshua against Grabaon. The inhabitants of Armagh 
and the Ulidians (the people of Down) were severally and 
naturally anxious to have his remains deposited amongst 
them;< it was however, so arranged that his body was interred 
in Down, and a great part of his reliques were. conveyed to 
Armagh.t 

The wisdom — ^the power and the providence of an all-ruling 
God were manifested in the general establishment of Chris- 
tianity; and the same wisdom — the same power and provi- 
dence were displayed in the conversion of the Irish people, 
and in the establishment of their national church. For ages 
revolving after ages they were buried like the rest of mankind 
in one long and dismal night of mental darkness, but at the 
presence of the cross of Christ, the clouds and shadows dis- 
appeared. Eighteen centuries have since rolled on, during 
which time this brave and faithful people have passed 
through an ordeal of trials and persecutions unparalleled in 
the history of mankind. — Every effort has been made to 
seduce or force them from the old venerable path marked 
out by their forefathers; but the same light, the same identi- 
cal faith continues to shine in the midst of them, while the 
puny and contemptable opposition of man has contributed 
only to mark her career with still greater glory, with re- 
newed vigour and with additional brilliancy. 

* Fi«ch*8 hymn, stroph 29. t Third life, c, 88,->Tr. Th. p. 2^. 



CHAPTER II. 

Successors of St. Patrick — Episcopal Sees — Religious founr 
dations of the fifth century. 

The attention of the reader having been hitherto ahnost 
exclusively directed to the important labours of the Apostle 
himself; our next. object must be, to examine vrith the same 
care and impartiality all the other portions of this ancient 
and venerable superstructure. On the demise of St. Patrick 
BsNiGNUs, his constant missionary companion and favourite 
disciple, vras, vtrith the unanimous voice of the prelates, 
priests and people, appointed his successor,* and accordingly 
<A. D. 465,) he entered on the duties of his office, as Arch- 
bishop of Armagh and Metropolitan of Ireland.f While St 
Patrick veas employed in Connaught, the missionary labours 
of Benignus in several parts of that province are frequently 
mentioned and honourably extolled. However, it veas in the 
district of West Munster, or Kerry, and in some portions of 
the now county of Clare not visited by our Apostle, that 
Benignus gave splendid proofs of his zeal for religion, and 
of his anxious desire for the conyersion of his countrymen. 
St. Patrick entrusted him with the mission of those remote 
places, although he had been at the time only a priest, and 
so great were his services and such the veneration in which he 
was held, that the people of that country always considered 

* It may not be amiss to notice a most important mistake into which Colgan and 
others had unaccountably fallen, by introducing a Patritnu styled senior, as sue* 
cesaor of the Apoade, and immediately preceding Benignus. The hct k, this Patri* 
tins senior, or as the Tripartite has it, Sen-Patrick, is no other than St. Patrick him« 
self, to whom in his old age, the appellation tenex'tenior had been applied by some 
of our annalists.— See Laaigan, chq>. vii. p. 324«— Jooehn, c 116. 
t Tr.Th.p.393. 



32 

him a second Apostle.* He is said to have two learned 
disciples Buadmel and Carellus, the latter of whom accord- 
ing to the Tripartite was Bishpp of Tamnach, in the county 
of Sligo. The incumbency of Benignus was rery short, 
being but three years and some months — our annals supply 
us with very few facts connected with his episcopal govern- 
ment. He is represented throughout as a very holy man, 
and before his death had the happiness of witnessing the tri- 
umph of religion in many retired and uncultivated parts of 
Ireland. Like his master he foresaw his end approaching, 
and having sent for larlath, from whom he received the body 
of the Lord, his blessed soul shortly after retired to eternal 
rest, A, D. 468.t 

Iarlath was his successor, and continued to preside over 
the Archdiocese for a period of fourteen years. This Prelate 
was descended of an illustrious family and was bom in a 
place called Rath-trena in the present county of Down.J 
His father, whose name was Trena, had, it appears, been 
an uncle of Dicho, St. Patrick's first convert. He was a 
man of considerable power in that territory, and from him it 
seems to have derived the above appellation. During the in- 
cumbency of Iarlath the truths of the Gospel were making 
still rapid advances over Ireland. His virtues and the influ- 
ence which he possessed among the neighbouring dynasts of 
the country had served to open a way for the missionaries, 
and enabled them to preach in various districts, which had- 
not been hitherto favoured with the light of Christianity. 
Nevertheless, we have no sufiicient authority for stating, that 
Alild-Molt, the then reigning Monarch of Ireland, and suc- 
cessor of Leogaire, had followed the example of his subjects 
and embraced the Christian faith. Ha,d such an event taken 
place, the relation of it would not have been omitted by the 
several hagiologists, who have, in such copious abundance, 

• Vita S. Bcnigni, c. 6,— Tr. Th. p. 203. t Ibid, c, 18. t Ibid, L. 3. c. 67. 



33 

handed down to us the acts of St. Patrick, and all the 
memorable conveiBions that had been effected in those times. 
The contrary opinion, however, has been maintained by 
some,* while all agree that Murtagh, who reigned during 
the incumbency of larlath's successor, was without doubt a 
Christian, and employed his authority in placing the interests 
of religion on a secure and permanent basis. larlath, adopt- 
ing the great example of his predecessor, was particularly 
attentive to the cause of education, and laboured incessantly 
in advancing the welfare of the rising literary establishment 
at Armagh. He supplied it with teachers, and gave high 
encouragement to its scholars, many of whom, when duly 
qualified, he advanced to the sacred ministry, and afterwards 
employed on the arduous duties of the mission. Having 
governed the sjee for about fourteen years, larlath died, 
abounding in merit, on the eleventh of February, A. D. 482,t 
and was succeeded by Cormac, the son of Enda, and nephew 
of Leogaire.J Enda, as we have already noticed, was con- 
verted by St. Patrick, on which occasion Cormac, who was 
then a young man of prepossessing manners and considerable 
acquirements, was placed by his father under the peculiar 
care and instruction of St. Patrick himself. Having after- 
wards distinguished himself by his learning as well as by his 
sanctity, he was universally and most deservedly looked up 
to as a proper person to fill the metropolitan see, and become 
a successor of his master St. Patrick. Leogaire the monarch 
of Ireland had, some years before this, been cut off in battle.§ 
He was an obstinate and a wicked man, and although at 
times he seemed inclined to change his heart and embrace 
the Gospel, yet it appears he lived and died a pagan. . Alild 
Molt, as already stated, succeeded him, but it is probable 
had not been a Christian. Lugaid, the son of Leogaire, was 

• O'Connor, Dissert. 1. Sec. 15. t A. A. S.S. at 11 Feb. 

t Ware, Bishops. $ CFlahcrty, Ogygia, c. 93. 

E 



34 

the reigning Monarch in the time of Connac. This Prince 
followed the example of his father, and if possible surpassed 
him in wickedness and hardness of heart. His end was still 
more awful than that of his parent. He was struck dead by 
lightning as a just judgment from heaven for his obstinacy 
in paganism and his opposition to the Christian Religion. 
However, the succeeding Monarch, Murtagh, became a Chris- 
tian, and by his excellent and exemplary reign made ample 
reparation for the crimes and excesses of his predecessors.* 
Connac died A. D. 497, and was succeeded in the see of 
Armagh by Dubtach, a native of the district of Dervin in 
the county of Louth.f The few scattered fragments that 
remain, merely to remind us of the wreck which our an- 
cient history sustained during the awful periods of the six- 
teenth and seventeenth centuries, give us to understand, that 
the primate Dubtach made the life and actions of our holy 
Apostle, his favourite and constant model, during the sixteen 
years of his administration in the see of Armagh. He took 
care that a suitable number of churches should be erected in 
those remote quarters on the Northern and Western coast, 
which until his time had not been actually converted to 
Christianity. He caused many of the churches hitherto 
erected to be enlarged and beautified. By his means an 
ample supply of active and holy men was in constant readi-. 
ness, and these missioners were, by their learning, zeal and 
sanctity, prepared on all occasions to go forth and teach the 
truths of the Christian Gospel to the remaining portion of 
their brave but benighted countrymen. Above all, he took 
especial chaise of the education and morals of the people, 
and accordingly devoted a great portion of his time to the 
establishment and superintendence of schools; particularly to 
the celebrated seminary of Armagh. As the incumbency of 
Dubtach commenced at the close of the fifth century and in- 

• A. A. S.S. p. 677: f Ware, Biahopt. 



35 

eluded a portion of the sixth, the regular order of time 
jrequires that we should, at least in a brief manner, turn our 
attention to the other episcopal establishments, which even 
now in their infant, yet well regulated condition, were spring- 
ing up numerous and triumphant throughout the land. 

Agreeably to a Canon of the Council of Sardica, Bishops 
were not to be consecrated unless there was a necessity for 
them, and even then they were to be placed in respectable 
cities. This decree was, however, evidently dispensed with, 
in the peculiar case of the Irish Church at this period, as 
appears from the very establishment of the see of Armagh, 
which at that time was little more than a soUtary uninhabited 
wood. St. Patrick was guided in this respect according to 
the exigency of time, place, and other circumstances. When 
a district had been converted to Christianity and a church 
erected therein, a bishop was then consecrated and placed in 
that part where the Christian population was most numerous. 
His business it was, to establish the faith in the hearts of the 
people, to erect churches, ordain priests and superintend the 
ecclesiastical afiairs of the district. Hence it is, that we find 
prelates residing in some places without any mention having 
been made of their immediate successors, such as Auxilius at 
Killossy, near Naas, and Iseminus at Kilcullen. Many of 
them presided over districts which after the death of the in- 
cumbent became annexed to other sees, as Tassach of Rath- 
colphtha, near Down, and others; and some, as Cethecus» 
without having any fixed see, were employed by the Apostle 
in preaching the Gospel throughout those remote quarters 
where the faith had not as yet been fully establislied. Ac- 
cording to the Tripartite, St. Patrick consecrated three hun- 
dred and seventy bishops— Jocelin reduces the number to 
three hundred and fifty; while Nennius and others adapting 
their computation to the number of days in the year, swell up 
their list to three hundred and sixty-five. But these state- 
ments, besides being incredible, cannot, for the want of suffi- 



36 

cient authority be admitted as genuine. MoBt undoubtedly a 
great number of prelates had been consecrated by St Patrick, 
and the catalogue was greatly increased immediately after his 
death, so that r^oning an hundred years, the period as- 
signed to the fitst class of Irish saints, there might have 
been in all, between bishops properly so called and ehorepw^ 
capi,* three hundred and fifty, or perhaps more in Ireland* 
Our object being, to examine the origin of the sees now in 
existence, together with the principal early ones which hare 
been since united, we shall proceed chronologically and com-' 
mence with the see of Ardagh. 

Thb see of Ardaqh. — ^This see situated in the county of 
Longford, (the ancient Te£Eia,) may be deservedly numbered 
amcMig the most ancient churches of Ireland. Its founder 
and first bishop was Mel or Mael; he was a native of Britain 
and was consecrated by St. Patrick about the year 453.t 
The scattered fragments which now remain of the acts of this 
holy man, when separated from the inaccuracies with which 
they are accompanied, are but very few and unsatisfactory. 
During the long and painfiil mission of St. Patrick through- 
out the north of Ireland and in Munster, Mel was his con- 
stant and beloved companion. When the Apostle, after his 
many and successful conversions, had returned from that lat- 
ter province, he conceived the noble design of establishing 
an episcopal see in the centre of Ireland, and meeting with 
great encouragement from the dynasts and people of Tefiia, 
he consecrated Mel and appointed Ardagh as the place of his 
residence. From this spot, as from a centre, th# fame of his 
learning, but especially of his virtues, widely circulated, and 
he is said to have been powerfully instrumental in collecting 
vast multitudes to the fold of Christ. He is also represented 
as having been eminently endowed with the gift of prophecy, 
and during his travels through Kildare he foretold, among 

* For Chorepiscopi, see cent. 8. cliap. 2. t A. A. S. S. at 6 Feb. 



37 

other particulars, the birth and exalted sanctity of the great 
St Brigid. His eloquence and sweetness of disposition en- 
deared him to ally and elicited the well-merited encomiums of 
many ancient writers; ^^Melus," observes the author of the 
Tripartite, '^erat homo ver^ melleus." It must be observed, 
that the history of this Saint as delivered to us by Colgan^ 
Ware and others, abounds with improbable and unauthenti« 
cated matter, and has not been followed, at least on most 
points, by any of our subsequent hagiologists. That the 
Founder of the see of Ardagh had been the nephew of St. 
Patrick, by his sister Darerca, is an error which by.no means 
can be admitted. St. Patrick had neither sisters or nephews 
in Ireland; nor do the acts of St. Brigid, from which this 
story is taken, seem to warrant any such assumption.* The 
veneration in which St. Mel had been held for both learning 
and sanctity is well authenticated, and he has been deservedly 
ranked in Tirechen's list among the first and most distin* 
guished disciples of St. Patrick.t He was both bishop and 

* That St. Patrick bad neither sUiers or relatives with him in Ireland is evident 
from his own words, contained in his letter to Coroticus so frequently referred to.-— 
''NuRiqnid (says the Saint) sine Deo, vel secundum carnem Hiberione venil Quis 
me oompulit, alligatus spiritn ut non videam altquedi de cognatione raea?" and in his 
'* Confession" be expresses an ardent wish to see bis relatives. ' Non id solum, sed 
eram (paratus) usque in Gallias visitare fratres, &c." ' Can it, moreover, be supposed 
tihat the Saint, when entering on his arduous mission, would have brought with him 
to Ireland four sisters and a numerous train of relations? The story, as taken up by 
Colgan and others, is besides interwoven with most incredible circumstances. One 
of the sisters Darerca, had, it appears, seventeen sons, who were all bishops, and two 
dangbfeers, who became nuns ; (Tr. Th. p. 227.) while another sister, named Tigridia, 
had also seventeen sons, who became bishops or priests', and five daughters nana~>a 
similar narrative is given of the other two sisters, and among the sons are named 
Kieran, Brendan, Columb, Maccarthen and others who were unquestionably des- 
cended of Irish parents. Usher appears to have countenanced some of these stories* 
for which reason they have been incautiously received by some with a degree of ere, 
dibility. In those ancient times it was customary to designate religious persons by the 
appellation of brotiien and tittet-i, and hence it is probable the mistake originated re- 
lative to Darerca, Trigidia, &c, who were eminent, saintly women, and lived in the 
days of St. Patrick. Darerca died A.D. 518, Tigridia at a later period.— Four Mas- 
ter8.--A. A. S. S. p. QOl.-^ee Usher, Pr. p. 824. 
t Usher, p. 950. 



38 

abboty and is said to have written a monastic rule, which, 
however, is not extant. St. Mel died on the sixth of Febni- 
ary, A. D. 488, and was interred in the Church of Ardagh. 
The records of this see must have suffered severely during the 
devastations of the Danes. From the date of its foundation 
down to the incumbency of Christian O'Heotai in the twelfth 
century, we have the names of only four of its prelates on 
record. After that period, however, the succession proceeds 
regularly and satisfiu^torily. 

Thb 8BB OF Cloohsr, in the territory of Tir-Eogain ap- 
pears to have been founded about the year 454.* According 
to some writers this see was established by St Patrick him- 
8elf,t who afterwards resigned it to St. Maccarthen. This, 
however, is a groundless, improbable assertion. Its first 
bishop was Bt. Maccarthen. He belonged to the noble family 
of the Arads of Dalaradia, and was one of the oldest disci- 
ples of St. Patrick. The "Acta Patricii," with the Segments 
published by Colgan inform us, that he had constantly 
attended as a fellow-labourer with our Apostle, and at a very 
advanced age was appointed by him bishop of Clogher. To- 
gether with his Cathedral, he likewise by the directions of 
St. Patrick, laid the foundation of a monastery. It was 
situated (as the register of Clogher observes,) in the street 
before the royal seat of Ergall. Eochad, the dynast of that 
territory, and an obstinate pagan, appears to have given con- 
siderable opposition to the preaching of St. Maccarthen; he 
was however ultimately converted together with his whole 
family and dependants. In the appendix annexed to the 
life delivered by Colgan, twenty-one saints are enumerated, 
all of whom had belonged to the. family from which St 
Maccarthen was descended. We have also the names of 
twelve of his successors in the see of Clogher, with the date 
of their incumbency, commencing with the death of the 

/ Trip. L. 3. c. 3. t Jocelin, c. 143. 



39 

fotindery and ending with the year 1138, at i^hich time 
Christian O'Morgair, the brother of St. Malachy, had pre- 
sided over this diocess.* St Maccarthen died on the 24th of 
March| A. D. 606, and was interred in his own Cathedral.f 
St. Tigernach, his immediate successor, fixed his residence at 
Clones in the county of Monaghan, retaining at the same 
time the regular administration of the church of Clogher. 
For this reason he has been styled by our annalists, Ferda- 
criockf that is, the man of the two districts.X This great 
Saint, like his predecessor, was of princely descent, and was 
elevated to the episcopacy at the request of St. Brigid. He 
received his education at the Monastery of Rosnat in Britain^ 
was the founder of a religious establishment at Clones, and 
during his government of the diocess, was a great admirer of 
learned men and a promoter of literature. The events con- 
nected with this diocess occupy a considerable portion of the 
ecclesiastical history of subsequent times, but which neither 
the facts themselves or chronological arrangement will allow 
us in this place to anticipate. 

Thb sbb of Emit was founded by St. Ailbe, about the 
year 464.§ He was a native of Eliachj now called Eliogarty, 
in Munster, and became a disciple of St. Patrick about the 
year 446. Ailbe is represented by some writers, as having 
b^n a bishop and exercising episcopal functions in Ireland, 
previously to the arrival of St. Patrick. This statement,* 
besides being opposed to the testimony of Prosper, Tirechen, 
and other high authorities, becomes altogether incredible, 
when the important circumstance of the chronology itself is 
taken into account. It is evident from the annals of Ulster, 
of Innisfallen and other unquestionable sources, and is laid 
down as a truth admitted by all, that Ailbe's death occurred 
in the year 627.|| If then he had been a bishop in Ireland 

* A. A. 8. S. at 24ch March. t Usher, Ind. Chron. % A. A. S. S. p. 740. 
$ BoUftndkts, at 12th Sept. H See alao Ware, ad op. S. Patr. 



40 

before the arrival of St. I^atrick, he must of consequence have 
been more than ninety-five years an acting prelate, counting 
from 432, the year in which St. Patrick landed in the countiy. 
The opinion of these virriters, therefore, cannot be received, 
and the date already m^itioned, appears to be the most cor* 
• rect and consistent. Ailbe lived under the pious King Aengus, 
and having erected his Cathedral on a convenient site pre- 
sented to him by that Monarch, he soon after laid the foun- 
dation of a monastery and college, in which human literature 
and heavenly science were gratuitously taught, and which 
was in after times frequented by scholars from all parts of 
Europe. Among the number of eminent Irishmen who had 
received their education under St. Ailbe, we may with pro- 
priety mention Colman of Dromore, and Nessan of Mungret. 
The monastic rule of this great Saint is extant. Such were 
the virtues of Ailbe and so profound the veneration in which 
he was held by both Prince and People, that he was looked 
upon as another St. Patrick and considered a second patron 
of Munster. Desirous to avoid the respect which was shewn 
him, Ailbe determined to retire to the island of Tyle, (Ice- 
land.) He departed vrith a great number of his monks; the 
King, however, unwilling that himself and his subjects should 
be deprived of the eminent services of so great a man, pre- 
vailed on him to return to Emly. The monks to the number 
of twenty-two were allowed to proceed on their journey, and 
thus did the Church of Ireland, even at this early periods 
send forth and scatter its light among the benighted inhabit- 
ants of other and distant lands. During the incumbency of 
Ailbe, a Synod was held in Cashel, at which the King to- 
gether with the chiefs of the Desii attended. St. Declan of 
Ardmore with others were likewise present, and several whole- 
some decrees regarding morals and ecclesiastical discipline 
were enacted.* St. Ailbe died A. D. 527, and has been de- 
servedly numbered among the Fathers of the Irish Church. 

• Ware, Antiq. c. 29, 



41 

Thb 88B OF Elphin, Situated in a district of Conhaught 
called Machaire CanMocht, or the plain of Connaught, and 
given to Si. Patrick by Ono, a chieftain of the Hy-BruneSy 
had for its first bishop St. Asacus, a man of a most austere 
and penitential life.* Asacus as well as the Fathers already 
noticed, had been ranked among the earliest disciples of St. 
Patrick, and most probably had accompanied our Saint dur^^ 
mg his travels and laborious mission in the provinee of Ck>n- 
nanght. Hence it is that he has obtained a distinguished 
rank among the forty disciples of St. Patrick, as recorded in 
the ancient list of Tirechen. When St. Patrick had arrived 
at the territory of Elphtn (OUfinn) in the plain Machaire^ 
he appointed Asacus, then a simple priest, to superintend 
the missionary concerns of that district.f Here the Saint 
continued for some years and by his preaching and powerful 
example became an instrument in the ways of Providence 
for the conversion of vast numbers of the inhabitants. We 
have already stated, that in the year 455, St. Patrick had 
laid the foundation of his Cathedral Church at Armagh. 
Asacus, who, it appears, had been an excellent artist, ex- 
pressed an anxious desire to co-operate in this noble under- 
taking, and prayed that he might be allowed to assist in 
completing and beautifying the building. Having been ac- 
cordingly selected, he superintended the erection of the 
Church, and spent a considerable time in making the sacred 
vessels and other furniture requisite for the sanctuary.;}^ ^^^ 
many years after this occurrence he was consecrated and 
placed over the see of Elphin. The year of his consecration 
has not been ascertained, but it appears to have been, in all 
probability, about the year 465. St. Asacus founded a cele- 
brated monastery and college at Elphin, which both in his 
time and in after ages was frequented by numbers of stu- 
dentsi and has been justly ranked among the ancient literary 

• Ware, Bishops. t Tripart. L. 3. c. 39. % Id. L. 2. c. 44. 

F 



42 

institutions of the kingdom. After a laborious incumbency 
of many years^ his great love of retirement induced him to 
withdraw from his diocess and to devote the remainder of his 
days to prayer and solitude. He accordingly repaired to the 
mountain of Slieve^league, in Donegal, and amidst the aw« 
ful recesses of this solitary spot he fixed his abode; but was 
at length discovered by a number of his affectionate disciples.* 
These faithful followers, having in vain, implored him to 
abandon the resolution which he had formed, had now deter- 
mined on leading an ascetic life, and placed themselves under 
hisspiritual direction. On this desolate and solitary mountain, 
the Saint, attended by his brethren, ended his mortal career. 
The year of his death has not been stated by any of our 
annalists, but his natalis is marked at the 27th of ApriLi- 
His remains were interred at a place called Rath-cunga, in 
the present barony of Tyrhugh and county of Donegal.^: Of 
the acts, or even of the names of his successors, we have no 
ceilain record, until the twelfth century, at which period 
Domnald 0*Dubhai had presided over the see of Elphin. 

Th£ see of Connor, in the county of Antrim, had for it» 
first bishop St. .£ngus Macnisse, but the precise year of its 
foundation remains involved in great obscurity. It appears, 
however, to have been founded about the close of the fifth 
century. iEngus Macnisse was a member of an ancient 
and powerful Sept in Dalrieda, and agreeably to a custom 
which then prevailed in many of the Irish districts, he 
adopted the name of his mother, Nisa, whence he was gene- 
rally denominated Macnisse or Macnise.§ St. Patrick, dur- 

♦ Tripart. L. 2. c. 40. 

t Colgan was of opinion that St. Asacus of Elphin must hare been the same per* 
son as the Assanus mentioned in the Martyrology of Marian Gorman, in which case 
tlie natalis stands at the 27th of Apiil. Or should he be the Assinus referred to in 
the same Martyrology, the feast must then be commemorated on the 1st of May, or 
on the 19th of July.— See A. A. S.S. p. 114. 

X Tripart. L. 2. c. 40. $ £x Codice Salaman, M«S. ap. BoUand, 3rd Sep. 



43 

ing his mission in Dalrieda, had taken Macnise under his 
special care, and after some time placed him under the guid- 
ance of St. Olcan, the learned Abbot and Bishop of Rath- 
muighe, in the county of Antrim. According to the Salaman- 
tine copy, produced by the BoUandists, Macnise was conse- 
crated bishop by St. Patrick, after which he proceeded on a 
journey to Rome and from thence to Jerusalem. Here he re- 
mained for some time, and on his return to Rome was received 
by both clergy and people with peculiar marks of veneration. 
During his residence in Rome he ordained some bishops, and 
many priests and deacons, and on his return to Ireland was 
presented with various reliques of St. Thomas and other 
Apostles, together with an abundance of gold and silver ves- 
sels requisite for the use of the sanctuary. Soon after he had 
reached his native country, he laid the foundation of a mon- 
astery at Connor, and appears to have about the same period 
established his see in that place. St. Macnise is represented as 
a man of very exalted sanctity; he is said to have wrought many 
miracles and had been endowed with the gift of prophecy. 
Our annalists have not agreed as to the year of his death, 
but it may, according to the most probable account, be dated 
at A. D. 507.* The natalis of the Saint is marked at the 
3rd of September. By orders of Clement XII, a proper 
Mass, as well for this festival as for those of several other 
patron saints of Ireland was edited at Paris, by Nicholas 
Anthony O'Kenny, Prothonotary Apostolic in 1734.t The 
see of Connor was united to that of Down in the fifteenth 
century, under Eugene IV.J 

The see op Kildare§ appears to have been indebted for its 
foundation to the celebrated nunnery established by St. 
Brigid in that place.|| The sanctity of the Saint and the ex- 
cellence of her institute attracted vast multitudes to her 

• Annals of Innisfallcn f Bolland. { See Cent. xv. c. 2. 

§ So called from Kill (cell or chnrcb,) and Daire, which signifies oak, there hav- 
ing been a very high oak tree on the site where the church was built. 
II Cogitosus. second life. Prolog. 



44 

establishment, eo that in the lapse of a few years it became 
very extensive, and SLildare formed what in those days might 
be called a considerable and populous town. This eircum* 
stance it was which induced St. Brigid to make application 
for the i^pointment of a bishop. Her request was complied 
withy and Conlaith or Conlian, a man of retirement and 
sanctity was the person selected. This holy man had, for 
years previously, led an ascetic life in a solitary spot on the 
south banks of the Liffey;* his virtues were eminently ad- 
mired by St Brigid, and agreeably to her desire, he was 
removed from his favourite retirement and advanced to the 
episcopal dignity. Conlaith was accordingly the first bish<^ 
of Kildare, and was consecrated about the year 490. It 
would appear from Cogitosus, that this ceremony had been 
conducted with more than usual magnificence, and was 
attended by many of the ancient and sainted Fathers of the 
Irish Church.t Fiech, bishop of Sletty, Ibar of Beg-enn, 
Ercus of Slane, Maccaleus of Hy-falgia, in the King's county, 
Bronus of Cassel-irra, in Sligo, and other prelates alluded to 
by that author, had attended on that solemn occasion. The 
administration of St. Conlaith was marked with great wisdom, 
and during his incumbency the diocess of Kildare obtained 
an high rank among the episcopal sees of Ireland. At this 
time, however, it was not, as some writers assert, the eccle- 
siastical metropolis of the Province, nor had its prelate the 
title of archbishop. It certainly enjoyed that dignity at a 
later period, and after the title had been transferred to it 
from the see of Ferns; but at the time of which we are now 
treating, that distinction belonged without doubt to the see 
of Sletty .f The Cathedral Church of Kildare, which next 
to Armagh, was in those days, the most extensive and beau- 
tiful in the kingdom, had, it appears, belonged conjointly 
both to the nunnery of St. Brigid and to the diocesan. Be- 

• Fourth life, L, 2. c. 19. t Cogitosus, c, 6, t Vide Century vii, c. 2. Sec of Ferns. 



46 

yond the sanctuary, the great aiale was divided by a partition; 
the bishop and his clergy entered the church by a door on 
the north side, while the entrance for the abbess and her 
community was situated towards the south. It has been 
gratuitously asserted that St Brigid and her successors had, 
for many years been invested with jurisdiction over the see,* 
but this misstatement has most probably emanated from the 
circumstance of the, expenses of the Cathedral having been 
usually defrayed out of the funds of the nunnery. On the 
other handy it is said that St. Conlaith had authority, not 
only over the nunnery of St. Brigid, in Kildare, but also 
over all the churches and communities belonging to her insti- 
tute throughout Ireland. This statement^ however, proceeds 
solely from the unwarranted testimony of Cogitosus; he was 
an ecclesiastic of that diocess, and had, it may be presumed, 
availed himself of every opportunity to exalt the privileges of 
his native see.f Notwithstanding the repeated ravages of 
the Danish wars in this part of Ireland, the names of the 
successors of St. Conlaith have been carefully handed down 
to us. An unbroken series of prelates, amounting to thirty- 
five have governed this see from the time of its foundation 
down to the year 1100, at which period Aid O'Heremon was 
constituted bishop of Kildare.;|: St. Conlaith, after a life of 
zeal and apostolical labours, died the 3rd of -May, A. D. 519. 
Besides these episcopal sees, which continue to flourish 
even to this day, there were various other places over which 
bishops had been stationed in this century; towns and districts, 
at that period, of great celebrity, but which, through the re- 

* See Colgan.— Tr. Th. p. 627. 
t During the eighth century, when Cogitosuf floarished, the bishope of KUdtre 
enjoyed the title of archbishops of the Province, (a mark of honorary distinctjon 
whidi had been transferred from Ferns,) and had at the same time a degree of juris* 
diction over the nunneries of St. Brigid situated in Leinster, but we have no authority 
whatever for believing that this privilege had extended to any of the other provinces 
of the kingdom. 

t Ware Bishops. 



46 

volution of time are now reduced to comparative insignifi* 
cance. Many of them in fact exhibit nothing but the scat- 
tered ruins of their former grandeur, or perhaps the soUtary 
name of the holy men by whose learning, sanctity and 
wonderful labours they had in their day been rendered great 
and illustrious. 

Among these may be classed the seb of Sletty, in the 
Queen's county and on the borders of the county of Carlow. 
It was governed by the venerable Fiech.* — Beo-Esik or 
little Ireland, an island on the coast of Wexford, over which 
St. Ibar presided.f — Louth, which was placed under the di- 
rection of the learned and venerable Moctheus.J — Antrim, 
where St. Mochay presided.^ — Rath-colphtha, near Down, 
committed to St. Tassach, the prelate from whom St. Patrick re- 
ceived the last sacraments.^-HY-FALGiA, in the King's county, 
placed under the jurisdiction of St. Macaleus, from whom St. 
Brigid received the veil. — Oran, in Roscommon, where Cethe- 
cus had been stationed after years of wonderful missionary 
labour. — West Cashbl, in Sligo, governed by St. Bronus. — 
Rath-cunqa, in the county of Donegal, had St. Bitheus for 
its bishop. — Rath-muighb, in the county of Antrim, was di- 
rected by St. 01can.|| — ^The celebrated see of Duleek, in the 
County of Meath, was founded by St. Kienan, who presided 
over its administration for a number of years. — Donagh- 
Patrick, in the county of Galway, was consigned to the 
care of St. Falertus. — ^The see of Slane, in the county of 
Meath, venerable for its antiquity, but much more for the 
great character of its bishop, was placed under the guidance 
of St. Ercus — and the famed see of Ardmore, in the martial 
territory of the Desii, (county of Waterford,) was in the 
fifth century governed by the learned and holy Declan.1[ 
The solitary ruins of its once celebrated Cathedral, with 

* See c. iii. Fiech. t See c. iii. Ibar. X See Cent. ii. Louth. 

§ Tr. Th. p. 265. || See c. iii, Olcan. f See c. iii. Declan. 



47 

its round tower hanging upon an eminence over the ocean^ 
stand in the 19th century, an existing nfonument of the 
piety and religious spirit of our forefathers, and afford to 
the passing traveller a glimpse of those happy days, when 
Ireland in her glory and independence reared up and adorned 
her altars at home, and afterwards erected and adorned others 
in the land of die distant stranger. 

'After this brief classification of the sees of Ireland founded 
in the fifth century, the monasteries — ^the religious and literary- 
institutions, which constitute the glory and ornament of the 
country, next challenge our attention. Some of these had been 
erected by the converted princes of the Nation, but most of 
them by the zeal and unremitted labour of great and holy 
men, whom Providence had raised up as instruments for the 
accomplishment of its own grand designs. 

The rules by which the ancient monasteries of Ireland had 
been governed, were, in all probability, copied after the con- 
stitutions of the houses of Tours and the monastic establish- 
ment of Lerins, in which places St. Patrick had received his 
education. Hence we find that,, similar to Tours and Lerins, 
schools of science were attached to each monastery, and be- 
sides the usual solemn vows and the observance of a contem- 
plative . life, the Irish monks were likewise obliged to pay 
particular attention to what may be termed the active and 
practical duties. They had in many instances to attend to 
the cure of souls — ^to the conversion and instruction of the 
people, and to the diflusion of general and useful knowledge. 
The following are some of the principal monastic foundations 
of the fifth century. 

The MOiYASTBRY OP Emly,* once a place of celebrity, but 
now a mere village and a scene of desolation, was founded by 
St. Ailbe. It was situated on the borders of a beautifiil lake, 
and was surrounded by a delightftd and romantic country. — 

* County of Tipperary and in the bafooy of ClanwillmiQ. 



48 

The lake, consiathig of two hundred acres, has since been 
dried vp, while the Abbey, after baring been eleven tames 
plundered and demolished by the Danes, was suflfered to fall 
into decay soon after the arrival of the English. There were 
six hundred students at one time in the schools of Emly; in 
which, (says an ancient writer,) the sciences togeth^ with 
the knowledge of heavenly truths were gratuitously taught. 

Thb monastery of Ardmorb, in the county of Walerford, 
and in the barony of Decies vrithin Drum, had St. Declan 
for its founder. This Abbey had suffered the same fitte vrith 
that of Emly, and the last Abbot Eugene, is marked as a 
subscribing witness to the charter granted to the monastery 
of St* Finbar in Cork, by Dermot King of Munster, in 
1174.* 

Thb monastery op Beo-brik, in an island to the north of 
the harbour of Wexford, was founded by St Ibar. The 
Saint and founder of this Abbey (says Colgan) was versed 
in the knowledge not only of the holy word, but moreover in 
worldly science. The doctrine of magnitude was taught in his 
holy retreat, and made applicable to heavenly purposes; and 
scholars in countless numbers came and lived in and near the 
Monastery, where they were taught without expense the hid* 
den truths regarding God and man-f — ^These three establish- 
ments having declined and perished much about the same 
period, are here merely noticed in regular succession. We 
now come to those, which after surviving the fury of the 
Danes, and ccmtinuing to a later period, sunk at length 
amidst the general ruin and national wreck of the 16th 
century. 

The monastery of Armagh, was founded by the great 
Apostle of the Nation, and had for many i^es ranked 
amongst the most celebrated ecclesiastical establishments of 
the Christian world.;]: The great scbool of this Monastery 

* King, p.3a6. t A. A. &S. p. «17. t Tu Th. p. 289. 



49 

was afterwards conducted by St. Benignus. In process of 
tune it became amazingly extensive, and so great was its re- 
putation that scholars flocked to Armagh not only from 
Britain, but from almost all nations of the Continent. In 
consequence of this yast conflux of strangers, the city of 
Armagh branched out, in a few centuries, to a great extent. 
In the eleventh century it was portioned into four divisions, 
one of which, called the Trian-Saxon, was inhabited almost 
exclusively by English students, who had resorted tliither 
for the purpose of receiving their education. The rule of the 
Canons Regular of St. Augustine was introduced by Imar, 
the master of St. Malachy, in the commencement of the 
twelfth century, at which time its great Church was rebuilt 
and dedicated to St. Peter and St. Paul.* Its Abbots con- 
tinued in regular succession until the time of Elizabeth, when 
James O 'Donnelly was Prior and the last superior of this 
venerable religious foundation. Its possessions, arising from 
bequests and other sources, were immense. By the inquisi- 
tion which was taken in 1537, it was found to possess up- 
wards of two hundred and forty town-lands in various coun- 
ties, together with their tithes and alterages. Of these, 
twenty were situated in the parishes of Clonkamey, Clon- 
koughrose, and Tueaghy; besides various other property com- 
prised within the town of Armagh. This establishment was 
remarkable for its attention to the destitute; a considerable 
part of the possessions, having been, by order of the 
donors, constantly devoted to the sacred and noble pur- 
poses of Christian benevolence. In the sixteenth century, 
this asylum for the poor was closed for ever. Both the Priory 
and its possessions were seized upon by Elizabeth, and after- 
wards sold to Sir Toby Caulfield, at a stipulated annual rentf 
The monastery op Saul, in the county of Down and 
barony of Lecale, was founded by St. Patrick. This Monas- 

* See Cent, xii. c. 2. t Lodge, vol. 3. p. 86. 

G 



50 

tery was the favourite retreat of our Saint after the unremit- 
ted labours of his Apostleship; here also he breathed his last, 
on the 17th of March^ A. D. 465. It was governed by emi- 
nent and holy men until 1526^ when the last Abbot Glaisney 
son of Hugh Macgennis was iiiassacredy and shortly after the 
monuments of Saints Patrick^ Brigid and Columbkille were 
sacrilegiously profaned, while the Church itself was burned 
to the ground by the notorious Grrey, then Lord deputy of 
Ireland, The possessions of this Abbey were granted by 
Henry VIII, to Gerald, Earl of Kildare * 

The mokastery op Downpatrick had St, Patrick for its 
founder, and became in succeeding ages universally celebrated. 
The names and acts of its abbots have not been carefully re- 
corded until about the year 1183, when the Benedictines were 
introduced, having been brought by John De Courcey, from 
the Abbey of St. Werburgh in Chester.-f- In this enterprising 
leader the Monastery of Downpatrick found an attentive and 
a powerful benefactor. He endowed it with various and am- 
ple possessions, which were afterwards considerably aug- 
mented by the influence and benevolent donations of Malachy, 
Bishop of Down.J The recollections of its founder and of 
its ancient national importance were, however, unable to 
rescue it from diose monopolizing enactments which disgraced 
the parliaments of the fourteenth century. In 1380, it was 
enacted that no mere Irishman should be admitted to make 
his profession in this Abbey .§ At this period the Prior of 
Downpatrick sat as a baron in parliament. In the sixteenth 
century when the work of confiscation commenced, this 
Abbey was found to possess, among other property, twenty- 
eight parcels of land, each parcel containing a carucate or 
ballyboe, all of which was situated in the county of Down. 
These possessions, together with other property attached to 
the establishments of LismuUin and Ballybogan, in the 

* Aud. office. t Ware, Annals. 

X Monast. Angl. vol. 2. § King, p. 93. 



61 

county of Meath, and to the Abbies of Inch©, Saul, Gi^ay 
and Bangor in the county of Down, along with the Francis- 
can Convent and Abbies of St. John and St. Thomas, in the 
town of Down, were all granted to Gerald, Earl of Kildare.* 
The monastery op Duller, (Daimhliag, which signifies 
a house of stone,) in the county of Meath, was founded by 
St. Kienan (Cennanus,) about the year 470. The Saint him- 
self was a native of Meath — ^was descended of a noble family, 
and when an infant was baptized by St. Patrick. The estab- 
Kshment of his see at Duleek about the year 472 was, in 
pursuance of the example set by other prelates, accompanied 
by the foundation of this celebrated Monastery. To it, like- 
wise, a school was attached, while the zeal of its founder and 
the encouragement with which he received the admirers of 
literature within its walls had raised it, at this early period, 
to the rank of a rival institution with that of Armagh. St* 
Kienan has written a life of St. Patrick, which was greatly 
admired; he died on the 24th of November, A. D. 489.t 
This venerable retreat of sanctity was,, at six different periods, 
sacked and plundered by the Danes. In 1171, Myles Cogan^^ 
at the head of an English party, committed frightful destruc- 
tion within its sanctuary, but the Danes of Dublin, whom 
Providence had now raised lip as a scourge against the in- 
vaders, fell suddenly upon Cogan and his troops, and took 
ample satisfaction for the outrages which had been committed. 
After the lapse of eleven years, this establishment was rebuilt 
at the expense of Hugh de Lacy, at which time the rules of 
the Canons Regular of St. Augustine were introduced, and it 
was moreover made subject to the Priory of Lanthony, near 
Gloucester. Its Priors continued until the period of the 
general suppression, when its possessions consisting of eighty- 
three town-lands became a sacrifice to the confiscating fury of 

• Aud. office. t Four Masters. 



62 

the times. These lands were included in the following rte- 
lories: the rectory of Stamullen; Ardcath; Marre; Clonal- 
waise; Macetown; Dowth; Tymolle; Kilmessan, Rathkenny; 
Rathconnelly in the county of Westmeath — Castletown- 
Delvin; Killowan; Creganstown; Kilcanran; Duleek; part 
of the rectory of Mullingar; Nail; Dumrath; Grallagh 
and Cologe. Besides various property situated in Mullingar, 
Duleek and other towns. These immense possessions were 
granted to Sir Gerald Moore.* 

Thb monastery of Louth, which, in after times, became 
not only the seat of literature but moreover an open and 
friendly asylum for the poor, was indebted to St* Mocteus for 
its foundation. This holy man was a Briton, and after hav- 
ing spent many years, as a companion with St. Patrick in hia 
missionary labours, he was consecrated Bishop and estab- 
lished his residence at Louth.f It would appear that the 
Monastery of which we are treating had not been foimded 
until some short time after the death of our Apostle, and 
that the founder, who is generally designated in our annals 
by the term longtevusy had lived to the advanced age of one 
hundred years. Gratuitous education forms a prominent ob- 
ject in those various and sublime plans which Mocteus had 
contemplated for the general conversion and happiness of the 
Irish nation. The schools of Louth became on that account 
celebrated, and it is recorded, that one hundred bishops and 
three hundred priests distinguished for learning and sanctity 
had received their education within its sacred walls.j: It was 
several times pillaged by the Danes, while the native chieftains 
themselves, in their unfortunate struggles against each other, 
scrupled not to exhaust their vengeance on the literary retreats 
and consecrated sanctuaries of this venerable establishment. 
In 1148, it was rebuilt by Donchad O^Kervaill, (O 'Carroll,) 

• Kbg, p. «08,etfleq.— Harris's tab. t Tripart, L. 3. c. 98. ^ A. A. S. S. p. 190. 



63 

Prince of Orgiel, aiad Edan O'Kelly, Bishop of Clogher, and 
adopted the rule of the Canons Regular of St. Augustine.* 
From this period its Priors continued in unbroken succession 
until the year 1540, when John Wile was the last Prior, and 
its extensive possessions (the outline of which shall be re- 
served for the sixteenth century) became involved in the 
general wreck, and were afterwards granted to Sir Oliver 
Plunkett 

Thb monastbrt 07 Cloohbr was, according to some ac- 
counts founded by St. Patrick; it appears, however, much 
move probable that it had been established by St Maccarthen 
and had been altogether coeval with the see. It was erected 
under the invocation of the Blessed Virgin and continued for 
many years a celebrated nursery of learned and holy men* 
Its principal benefitctors were Christian O'Moigair, the 
brother of St. Malachy, and Matthew Mac Catasaid who had 
been bishop of the see in 1316, and at his own expense 
erected a capella immediately over the sepulchre of St. 
Maccarthen. During the two successive conflagrations of 
1396 and 1396, this splendid estabUshment was almost laid 
waste, but was afterwards rebuilt on a more extensive scale 
and in a style of still superior mi^nificence. At the time of 
the general suppression, this Monastery shared the same fitte 
with the other religious foundations of the kingdom. We 
have no precise account of its possessions; it is certain, how- 
ever, that in 1610, they had been annexed by James I, to the 
see of Clogher-t 

Thb mokasteby of Kilbabb, situated in the barony of 
Ofialy, and in the heart of a beatiful country, appears to 
have been established about the same period with the 
see, and to have derived its foundation from the same 
influential source. The origin of this religious retreat is 
certainly involved in considerable obscurity. The first Ab- 

* A. A. S. S. p. 737. t Harris'si tab. t Rolls, 10 Jac 



54 

bot of Kildare, whom we find recorded in Colgan's cata- 
logue is Aidusy or Aidan, ftumamed Dubh, (the black) 
who, after havii^ abdicated the throne of Leinster, became 
Abbot, and afterwards Bishop of Kildare, about the year 
638. After him are placed Lochin surnamed the Wise, Abbot 
of Kildare, in 694; Forannan, in 697; Modimochus, in 743, 
and many others to whom the single epithet of abbot has 
been exclusively applied. Nor does it appear from this cata- 
logue that Natfroich was the first Abbot of this Monastery, 
a misstatement which Archdall has advanced, while at the 
same time he refers to Colgan's list as his authority. The 
hospitality of this religious establishment was proverbial; the 
noble example of benevolence bequeathed by St. Brigid, 
having been handed down with scrupulous care from one 
generation of religious to another. Hence the Monastery 
of Kildare was in those happy days designated the '' stranger's 
home,'' where attention and comfort were afforded indiscrimi- 
nately, to all who had found it necessary to visit its sacred and 
hospitable gates. At length, after a lapse of 1000 years, 
and during the reign of Henry VIII, it seems that both the 
Christian religion and Irish customs wanted to be reformed — 
the former was considered too ancient to be good, and the 
latter too contemptable to be endured any longer — ^accord- 
ingly the old work of spoliation commenced, which in those 
days went by the name of reformation. The sacred name of 
religion was industriously employed, and under the pretence 
of remodelling the Church, that property, which for eleven 
centuries went to relieve the destitute, was at that period 
torn fit)m them, and sacrificed to the confiscating spirit of 
the day. Ever since — for the last 300 years, an unemployed 
and impoverished population have been left to starve upon a 
wild and bleak commons, without any other comfort save that 
patience and fortitude which by habit has become natural to 
the heart of an Irishman, or perhaps, occasionally, the casual 
pittance of some more fortunate and tender-hearted fellow- 



55 

creature. Elizabeth made a grant of this Abbey and its tene- 
ments to Anthony Deeringe and Redmond Oge Fitzgerald. 
Thus was religion reformed^ and the poor of Ireland brought 
to a sense of moral order, social happiness and consequent 
civilization!! 

The monastery op Lough-Dero, in the county of Don- 
egal. The lake in which this Monastery stood, is situated in 
the barony of Tirhugh, an4^ contains several islands, the 
largest of which is called that of St. Dabeoc, and by some, 
the island of all saints. In this island v^as a religious estab- 
lishment, founded, according to some writers by St. Patrick, 
but most probably by St. Dabeoc,* in whose honour three 
festivals are observed yearly — on the 1st of January — on 
the 24th of July, and on the 16th of December. St. Patrick's 
purgatory, so called, appears to have taken its rise from 
a holy man, named Patrick, who governed the Monastery 
and lived about the year SSO.f It was a place of great 
sanctity and much frequented by penitents and holy persons, 
but being situated too near the shore, the station was 
closed up, and another opened in a lesser island and at a 
more retired distance. Lough-Derg as a place of penance, 
was for many centuries in great repute, not only in Ireland, 
but even in distant countries. The Kings of England granted 
several safe-cenducts to foreigners, who were desirous to visit 
it; and particularly in 1638 to Nicholas de Beccario, a 
nobleman of Ferraria; and in 1397 to Raymond Viscount de 
Perilleux, a Knight of Rhodes, who repaired thither with a 
train of twenty men and thirty horses.^ However, through the 
licentiousness of after times, great abuses had been committed, 
. and accordingly we find that in 1497 this frequented Station 
was, upon the authority of Alexander VI, totally demolished 
by the Father Guardian of the Franciscans of Donegal, and 
some other persons from the deanery of Lough-Em, who 

* Aimal, Mojist. t Ware, Moo. * Rhymers, feeders, T. 6. 



66 

were deputed for that purpose. After a lapse of time, the 
devotions practiced in Lough-Derg had been revived, and new 
regulations were made to prevent the recurrence of any im- 
propriety. The venerable Priory of Dfebeoc has suffered a simi- 
lar fate with that of the other religious establishments of the 
kingdom. In the 16th century it fell amidst the general wreck, 
and became a prey to the unsparing rapacity of the times. 

The number of religious establishments belonging to this 
century is so great, that the limits of this analysis oblige us 
to compress our narrative within a certain compass. In their 
respective constitutions and on points of particular discipline, 
they might vary, but as to learning and hospitality, the rules 
and customs of all were perfectly similar. The following are 
a few of the principal monasteries founded by St. Patrick. 
Inisbbo in Hy-Kenselach, county of Wexford — Druimlias 
in the county of Sligo — ^Rath-Muiohe in Dalrieda, (iounty of 
Antrim — Colerainb, county of Deny — Druim-Inis, Qluin, 
county of Armagh — Ikisfsal, county of Wexford — Movill, 
county of Donegal-^FiKOLAs, county of DubKn-^MuNGRBT 
in the county of Limerick, over which St. Nessan was placed. 
The Psalter of Cashel states, that this establishment had at 
one period, six churches^ within its walls, and contained exclu- 
sively of scholars, 1600 religious — 600 of whom were learned 
preachers — 600 psalmists — and the remaining 600 applied 
themselves to contemplation, works of charity and other 
spiritual exercises. 



CHAPTER III. 

Seliffiaus and literary characters of the fifth century — 
General observations^ 

The saints who flourished in Ireland during the fifth and 
sixth centuries are divided by our ancient hagiologists into 
three classes, and in making this classification Usher i*ests upon 
the authority of some very old and authentic manuscripts.* 
The first class was composed of one hundred and fifty bishops, 
who were all filled with the spirit of God, and were the 
founders of churches. The second class consisted of priests, 
to the number of three hundred, besides many bishops. And 
the third class, to the number of one hundred, was composed 
of priests and some bishops. "These, (he says,) inhabited 
woods and desert places, living upon herbs which they culti- 
yated themselves and drinking nothing but water." The 
austerity of their lives and the sublime virtues which they 
practiced would appear to men of the present age almost in- 
credible, but these were some of the means by which the 
great saints of Ireland purchased glory for themselves, and 
eternal honour for the Church of which they were members. 
We are not to expect that the holy men of the fifth century, 
who were active and laborious missionaries and who had an 
unbounded harvest before them, could find much time for the 
production of any deep, elaborate, scieMific works. Many 
of them were well versed in science and polite learning; some 
of them were gifted with mental powers of the first order — 
and all of them were enriched with that knowledge which is 
above and far surpasses all human knowledge — the Js:now- 

• Primord. Eccl. Brit. c. 17. 



58 

ledge of themselves and of God, and the method by which 
they could draw their fellow-creatures to happiness here, and 
tcf never-ending happiness hereafter. 

St. Ibar, Bishop, Abbot and founder of the celebrated 
Monastery of Beg-erin, on the coast of the county of Wex- 
ford, holds an high rank among the saints of the fifth cen- 
tury. • This Saint was a native of Ulster, and became a con- 
vert to the Christian faith while St. Patrick had been em- 
ployed on his mission in that province. Though descended of 
an illustrious family, with all the allurements of honour and 
opulence before him, his resolution in obeying the call of 
heaven remained unshaken, and in all the subsequent labours 
of our Apostle through the several districts of Leinster and of 
Munster, Ibar was his constant companion and i-anked in the 
number of his most favourite disciples. So high was the (^[un- 
ion which St. Patrick had entertained of the zeal and virtues 
of Ibar, that aft;er some time he commissioned him to preach 
the Gospel through Ireland, and by his instrumentality were 
numbers converted to the faith.* On his return from this 
mission and on his arriving at the eastern boundaries of 
Leinster, he settled at Beg-erin, and here he founded his 
great monastery in which human science and the secrets of 
heavenly wisdom were taught. This religious and literary re- 
treat was opened •gratuitously for all — ^the stranger from the 
distant shore was received and welcomed at its gates — and 
these foreigners, with crowds of native Alumni, served in 
process of time to establish the high reputation of the far- 
famed school of Ibar. The date of his promotion to the 
episcopacy has not been accurately ascertained, but it must be, 
in all probability, about the year 460. However, we are not 



* " Ibtras miflsus est ad evaogelium predicandum per Hibeniiam, in qua umumeras 
ad fidem Christt convertit — ad fiacs Lageniensiuiii venit et australem ejus partem, 
ubi est Utoralis parva insula, Beg-erin,. nbi celebre condidit ccsnobinm, et Sacras 
ibidem Uteres, aliasque artes opdmas docuit mazimam multitadinem Hibemorum et 
aliorum."— Vita Ibari, Usher, p. 1061. 



left in the same uncertainty with respect to the year of his 
death, which, according to the Annals of Ulster and Innisfal- 
len, took place A. D. 600. This circumstance alone is suffi- 
cient to overthrow the opinion of those who have endeavoured 
to maintain that Ibar was a bishop, and officiating as such in 
this country, previously to the arrival of St, Patrick. Should 
the veracity of this statement be admitted, it must follow 
from the above annals and other authorities,* that the Saint 
had been nearly eighty years an acting bishop in Ireland! 
Those who defend- the above opinion rely principally on the au- 
thority of some unauthenticated fragments of the Acta Sancti 
Abbani; but from these very documents it would appear that 
both St. Abban and St. Ibar had flourished in Ireland during 
the pontificate of Pope Gregory I, and consequently at the 
close of the sixth century, which involves a still greater ab- 
surdity .f The date specified in the Annals of Innisfallen and 
of Ulster is that which is now generally admitted, while the 
natalis of the Saint is marked by all at the 23rd of April. 

St. Declan, Bishop and founder of the see of Ardmore, 
in the county of Waterford, flourished in the fifth, and be- 
came eminently distinguished during a considerable part of 
the sixth century. This Saint was descended from Ercus, 
Prince of the Desii, and by his exalted virtues soon became 
the Tobject of universal respect and veneration. The precise 
time in which he fixed his see at Ardmore is not exactly 
stated; but it must have been at least some years after the 
death of St. Patrick. St. Declan is mentioned as one of the 
four prelates who had been employed in preaching the Gospel 
in Ireland, prior to the arrival of St. Patrick. The state- 
ments regarding the seniority of Ailbe and Ibar were certainly 
incorrect, but the introduction of St. Declan among the num- 
ber leads to a still more palpable anachronism. The opinion 
is founded on a manuscript copy of his life, preserved in the 

* Ware, Annot. ad op. &c. t See BoIIandivts at 23rd or April. 



60 

Franciscan Convent of St. iBodore, at Rome, and on Bome 
anonymous tracts compiled and published at Louvain. Now 
if these documents were to be received, the most evident in- 
consistency must follow. We are informed by the Isodorean 
manuscript and by the Louvanian memoir that, on Declan's 
second return from Rome, he repaired to Wales, for the pur- 
pose of paying a visit to St. David, then Bishop of Minevia.^ 
But this event would bring us to the middle of the sixth 
century, that being the period at which St. David lived. 
Hence, in this hypothesis, St. Declan must have been at least 
one himdred and twenty years a bishop! The truth is — St. 
Declan did not become a member of the episcopal order un- 
til some time after the decease of St. Patrick, and his death 
occurred shortly after that of St. Ailbe of Emly, A. D. 627. 
The Martyrologies of Dungal and .£ngus supply abundant 
evidence of the virtues and sanctity of St. Declan, and of 
his wonderful missionary labours in the extensive territory of 
the Desii, over which he had presided. 

St. Fibch, the learned Bishop of Sletty, in the Queen's 
county, is deservedly ranked among the Fathers of the Irish 
Church. He was of the distinguished house of Hy-bairrche, 
in Leinster, and as has been already noticed, was the first 
person from that province who had been raised to the episco- 
pacy in Ireland. Having been a member of the Bardic order, 
and deeply skilled in the literature of those times, Fiech 
established a seminary which soon became celebrated, and he 
is said to have a great number of disciples. Sletty became 
at this time the ecclesiastical metropolis of the province, and 
its Prelate enjoyed the title of Archbishop.t This dignity, 
however, did not in a canonical sense imply any sort of 
metropolitan jurisdiction; it was simply a mark of pre-emi- 
nence — an honorary token of precedency and of superior dis- 
tinction. It had been continued in the see of Sletty until the 

* £z Arcbiv. S. Isodori. Ann. vi. t Trip. L. 3. c. 21. 



61 

deventh century, when it was transferred to Ferns. Fiech 
has written a metrical life of St. Patrick which is extant, and 
held in high veneration: the Scholia annexed to it in later 
times contain some inaccuracies, but these, besides being of 
minor import, are abnost overlooked amidst the great quan* 
tity of valuable information with which they are embodied. 

St. Olcak, sometimes called Bolcan, Bishop and Abbot 
of Rathmuighe or Derkan, in Dalrieda, county of Antrim, is 
considered the most learned of all those who conducted edu- 
cation in the fifth century. He was baptized by St. Patrick, 
and after some years repaired to Graul for the purpose of pro- 
secuting his studies;* on his return he was advanced to the 
episcopal rank and stationed in Dalrieda. The great Mon- 
astery of Rathmuighe was founded by Olcan, and its schoolsf 
became pre-eminently celebrated for the study of the sciences, 
as well as for scriptural and theological instruction. - Among 
the number of his scholars was St. Macnise, who afterwards 
became the first bishop of Connor. Several valuable works 
are said to have proceeded from his pen which have since be- 
come a prey either to the wreck of time or to the fiiry of per- 
secution. The natalis of St. Olcan is dated at the 20th of 
February. 

St. Fridolinus, famed for learning as well as for piety, 
flourished in this century. He was son of an Irish Prince, 
and after embracing the monastic state, retired from his na- 
tive country and travelled through Grermany, France and 
other parts of the Continent; on which account he is caHed 
Fridolinus the traveller, by Coccius, Possevin and others.;): 
After preaching in many parts of Graul, he was appointed 
superior of the Monastery of St Hilary at Poicteurs. Several 
religious establishments were founded by him in Strasburg, 
Thuringia, Alsace, and on the frontiers of Switzerland. That 
Fridolinus ranked amongst the most learned men of his day, 

* JooeliDy c. 8S. t Usher, Ind. Cbron. t Appw. Sac. 



62 

may be collected from the testimony of Gastard Braccius,^ 
Posseyin, and niuneroiis other foreign authorities. He died 
about the year 614, and was interred in the Monastery of 
Seckingy an island of the Rhone, and of which he himself 
was the founder. 

SsDVLiuSyf (Sheil,) the Poet, an Irishman, and a disciple 
of Hildebert, likewise flourished in the fifth century. He 
was deeply read in both sacred and profane literature; and 
had a particular taste for poetry. Having distinguished 
himself as a scholar in his own country, he went to Gaul and 
from thence to Italy, afterwards to Asia, and then returned to 
Rome, where he shone by his astonishing erudition. and 
beautiful compositions. A council composed of seventy 
bishops, in the pontificate of Gelasius, bear honourable tes- 
timony to his writings. "We have the highest opinion (say 
these Fathers) of the Paschal work, written in verse by the 
venerable Sedulius.^'^ He was a great favourite with Hilde- 
phonsus. Archbishop of Toledo. This learned Prelate speak- 
ing of Sedulius says — "He was an evangelical poet, an elo- 
quent orator, and a Catholic writer.'' Finally, the Church 
has selected the hymns, "A solis ortus cardine,'' and "Hostis 
Herodes," with many others from the writings of Sedulius, 
and honoured them with a place in the divine office, together 
with the "Salve sancta parens," which forms the Introit of 
the Mass of the blessed Virgin — ^According to some writers, 
he was a bishop, but it is more probable that he rose no 
higher than to the rank of a simple priest.§ Sedulius died 
about A. D. 494.11 

* Oe Monas. Ger. 

t The name written in Irish, is Sisdhuil — n name, as it appears, not to be met 
with in any other nation. Colgan has enumerated eight dtstioguished Irishmen of 
this name who flourished in ancient times, and he Very justly adduces it as a circum- 
stance to prove that Sedulhiswas a native of this country.— Vide, A. A. S.S. p. 315. 

X Usher, Pri. Eccl. c. 769.— A. A. 8. S. at 12th Feb. 

$ St. laodorc— dc Eccl. Scrip. || Usher, Pr. p. 777. 



63 

We shall close this brief biogrftphical series with the history 
of the ever-revered and illustrious St. Brigid. This eminent 
Saint was of royal extraction; her father, Dubtach having 
been descended from Con of ^^the hundred battles/' and her 
mother, Brochessa, from the noble house of the O'Connors, 
in the territory of the Bregii, near Drogheda.* They were 
both Christians, and from them Brigid received not only the 
best example but also an excellent education, suited to her 
sex and necessary for her high station in life. She was bom 
A. D. 453, at Pochard, (Faugher,) about two miles to the 
north of Dundalk; but the residence of her parents was in 
Kildare and not far from the place where the monastery had 
afterwards been established. When arrived at a suitable age, 
they seemed desirous that she should embrace the married state; 
but Br^d humbly objected, declaring her wish and intention 
of remaining a vii^in and of consecrating herself to God. — 
For this purpose she applied to the holy bishop Maccailef 
who was then at Usneaeh, in West-Meath, and from him she 
received the veil and white cloak or habit; that being the 
only colour used by consecrated virgins in the ancient Church 
of Ireland. At this time she is said to have been in her 16th 
year. Eight maidens took the veil with her, and having ac-* 
ceded to their request, she fixed her residence in Ballyboy, 
in the King's county, at a place called to this day Brigid's-town* 
The fame of her sanctity had now reached the most distant 
parts of the island, and she was invited to come and form 
^tablishments in various districts. Ere, Bishop of Slane, 
had a particular respect for the Saint. Him she accompanied 
to Munster whither he had gone on business connected with 
the general interest of the Irish Church. We next find her 
in the plain, of CUach, (Limerick,) and here also she estab- 
lished a religious foundation. Brigid next proceeds to Con- 
naught where she founded several nunneries which were soon 

* Third life— Fifth life. t Usher, p. 1031.— Cogitoeus, c. 30. 



64 

filled with holy women, all liying under the constitutions and 
government of the Saint. Having sojourned for a time in 
this province, she directed her course back to Kildare, and 
passing through Hy-Kinsellagh, farmed many communities 
in that district In 483, the celebrated nunnery of Kildare 
was founded by St. Brigid. The great reputation of the 
Saint, and the supernatural gifts with which she was en- 
dowed, attracted multitudes of pious females to her establish- 
ment, and in a few years it became', perhaps, one of the first 
religious houses at that period in the Christian Church. 
Next to the attention which her nuns were obliged to pay to 
the education of the poor, hospitality has been noticed as a 
leading characteristic. At one period the country was visited 
by an awful pestilence accompanied with famine, on which 
occasion the holy Virgin sold even the sacred ornaments for 
the purpose of relieving the poor. This example of charity 
and benevolence was ever after remembered; and tenderness 
for the poor and the afflicted was the great motto, in which the 
succeeding members of her institute were accustomed to glory. 
St. Bs%id was gifted with the power of miracles,* and her 
respect for the memory of St. Patrick was most profound and 
oftentimes enthusiastic. By her means a bishop was ap- 
pointed for Kildare, which in a short time became a con- 
siderable town; an extensive monastery and school were soon 
after attached to this Church. Thus while the poor of Kildare 
and of the surrounding country had been blessed with the 
advantages of education, the door of hospitality was thrown 
open and every comfort afforded them by the generous follow- 
ers of this heavenly and justly celebrated institute. St. 
Brigid after having received the Viaticum fi-om St. Nennidh, 
was called to enjoy the reward of her labours A. D. 623. 
This great Saint left behind her a rule or body of constitu- 
tions, which was aft;erwards scrupulously observed in all the 

• Third life.— Tr. Th. p. 626. 



65 

establishmentB Bubjected to her institute, lik^wiee several 
tracts on the ascetic life; a letter written in Irish to Bt. 
Aidus; and two poems on the merits of St. Patrick.* The 
virtues of St Brigid have been honourably recorded by all 
our martyrologists; and her memory was revered not only in 
Ireland, but likewise in Britain, and by the &ithful all over 
the Western Church.t 

From the concise review which we have now taken of tho 
historical facts of the fifth century, several pertinent anjl 
profitable observations must present themselves to the reflect- 
ing mind of the reader. In the first place, it may be noticed, 
that St. Patrick, although invited by an heavenly call, to 
imdertake the ^eat work of preaching the Gospel, and of 
converting the Irish nation, yet did not embark on the high 
duties of that solemn office without having had recourse to 
the fountain-head of authority, from which alone all mission's- 
ary powers and ecclesiastical jurisdiction must lawfully and 
regularly emanate. Our Apostle was well aware ef the ne- 
cessity and existence of a supreme visible head over the 
Church of Christ upon earth. Hence he repaired to Celestine, 

• Colg«n, Tr. Th. p. 610. 

t Colgan has publislied six lives of St. Brigid with learned and copioos appen* 
dizes. There ife also foar difiereDt ecclesiastical offices for the iestiyal of the same 
Saint. The first is that published at Paris, in 1622, with proper lessons, hymns, 
antiphons, &c. The second is taken from the Roman Breviary, edited at Venice, 
by Anthony de Ginnta, in 1522. The diird is from the Gienensian Breviary— and 
the fourth, from the Canons Regular of St. John Latenuu The first of the above 
mentioned is a metrical one, and as appears from its prefoce, was written by St. 
Brogan of Rostuirc, in Ossory, about the middle of the seventh century. It was 
compooed in the Irish language, and is given by Colgan in the ancient characters, 
together with a latin translation. The whole piece consists of fifty*three stanzas, the 
last of which runs in the following words : — 

« Sunt dua sancta Virgines in Coalis, 
Que suscipiant meam protectionem ; 
Maria, etsancta Brigida, 
Quarum patrocinio innitamur sioguli." 

SeeTr.Th.p.618. 
I 



66 

who at that time sat in the chair of 8t. Peter, and from him 
did St. Patrick receive his misBionary and legitimate jurisdic- 
tion. 

Again, it must be observed, that the Apostle of Ireland, 
though he was not about to establish a religion hitherto un- 
heard of by mankind, or to effect that, which in the language 
of modem times, is inconsistently termed a reformation of 
the Church of Christ, yet did he demonstrate the truth of 
his doctrine — ^and the grounds of his authority — and. the 
validity of his commission, in the presence of the whole na- 
tion, by the most powerful and stupendous miracles. This 
has been attested by both protestant and catholic antiqua- 
rians, and stands incontestably supported by the writings of 
Probus, the Scholiast and all our ancient hi^ologists. In 
short, the doctrine which St. Patrick received together with 
his ordination from the Catholic Church, was of course the 
same, which was then believed and practiced by the universal 
Christian world; and that the Catholics of Ireland now hold 
and believe the same truths which 1400 years ago were 
taught and inculcated to our forefathers by the Apostle of the 
nation cannot by possibility be denied. Protestant writers 
of great literary distinction bear honourable testimony to the 
truth of this position; nay more, our ancient liturgies, and 
even the fragments that remain of our national records — ^the 
very ruins of the country, and the ivy-clad monuments that 
lie mouldering on the walls of the cathedral and the con- 
vent — all proclaim the venerable Catholic creed of former 
days, and serve to remind us of that holy religion in which 
our forefathers gloried and for which numbers of them shed 
their blood. Besides the dogmas or articles of faith which 
the Apostle delivered to our ancestors, and which must be 
essentially one and the same through all ages and nations, 
there are also disciplinary laws emanating from St. Patrick, 
which must challenge our attention. For the sake of brevity, 
allusion shall be made merely to those few on which the con- 



67 

version of the country and the moral civilization of the people 
nudnly depended. St. Patrick was fully aware that two 
grand mediums w«re absolutely necessaiy for the conversion 
of any country— namely, public gratuitous education; and a 
priesthood divested of wealth, estranged from this world, 
and having neither the ties of kindred or of earthly affection 
to lead them astray from the great work in which they were 
engaged. This doctrine he himself learned in the retreats of 
Tours and Lerins; and almost as soon as he had entered on 
the mission of Ireland, he took particular care to reduce it to 
practice. Hence, we find numerous monasteries founded in a 
very short time after the conversions made by our Apostle in 
the halls of Tarah. These parent establishments in a few 
years branched out through the country — every monastery 
was essentially a college in which youth was gratuitously in- 
structed — the indigent and the desolate found an asylum and 
a home within its hallowed walls — while the monks them- 
selves, renouncing the world and bound down by solemn ob- 
ligations, placed their only happiness in the hope of an eter- 
nal revmrd, and their only glory in the extension of the cross 
of Christ. Such was the system adopted by St. Patrick; 
such has been the system of the Catholic Church from the 
earliest ages, and its effects particularly in this country shall 
be more clearly developed in the subsequent pages of this 
analysis. It now remains for the reader to draw the contrast 
between the state of Ireland in those ancient times and its 
present impoverished, degraded condition. The former ex- 
hibits a nation prosperous and happy, vrith its people abound- 
ing in every comfort. The traveller on his way and the 
stranger far from home, had a place of welcome and of rest — 
the child of genius, though destitute and abandoned by the 
world, knew where to find an asylum — the indigent and the 
infirm had an home, and a friendly home within the hospi- 
table gates of the Christian convent. It is unnecessary to 
dwell on the counterpart of this melancholy picture. Instead 



of plenty or comfort, or houses of hospitality, we have now 
an unemployed population — ^a people literally maddened with 
distress and be^ary — a nation overwhelmed with a debt, 
such as has not been known since the foundation of society; 
together with all its concomitant train of evils, discontent, 
pauperism, disease and starvation. When we come to treat 
of the sixte^ith century, the clue of this apparent paradox 
shall be fairly unravellei. 



SIXTH CENTURY. 

CHAPTER L 

State of the Church of Ireland at the commencement of the 
sixth century-^Ecclesiastical seats of literature established 
during that period-^The Colleges of Clonard, of Clonfert, 
of Clonmacnois and of Bangor — Effects which the religion 
of the country had derived from these literary foundations 
— Effects which foreign nations had received from the same 
establishments — St. Columbkille — History of his Apostoli- 
cal labours — St. Columbanus — His acts at Lutzen — At 
Eregentz and in Switzerland — Establishes the celebrated 
Monastery of BobMo — His writings and death — Character 
of the Church of Ireland at the close of the sixth century. 

The sixth century forms one of the brightest epochs in the 
annals of the Church of Ireland. At this period the monarchs 
and princes of the land were Christians; their subjects save 
in some few and remote places had generously embraced the 
faith; the ancient druidical superstitions^ which had for so 
many ages triumphed over reason, truth and morality were 
laid prostrate, while genuine religion and the practice of the 
most sublime virtues were progressively advancing and formed 
the standing character of the nation. It has been already 
stated, that education and a priesthood disengaged from 
attachments to this world were the principal ordinary means 
employed by our great Apostle and his successors for effecting 
this grand and wonderful revolution. The same Gospel-like 
system had been followed up on a more extensive scale and 
with similar results in the century of which we are now treat- 
ing. It will; therefore; be necessary in this chapter to turn 



70 

our attention, first to the principal schools or collies founded 
in the sixth century, together with the history of the gieat 
and holy men by whom they had been conducted; and then 
to examine the effects which these establishments had pro- 
duced not only in Ireland, but likewise in other and distant 
regions. From among the numberless retreats of literature 
by which our country had in this age been distinguished, four 
principal ones shall be selected; namely, Clohard under St. 
Finian — Clonfbbt under St. Brendan — Clonmacnois under 
St. Kieran, and Bavoor under St. Comgall. — Clokarb is 
situated near the banks of the Boyne, in the bar<Miy of 
Moysenrath, county of Meath, and its celebrated monastery 
and school were founded by St. Finian, A. D. 530. Finian 
was a native of Leinster,* and having spent the early part of 
his life under the care of the learned Fortkem, he felt a de- 
sire to visit foreign countries, for the purpose of acquiring an 
additional stock of theological information. Accordingly he 
retired to Kilmuire in Britain, and was kindly received by 
the holy men David, Gildas and Cadoc, with whom he con- 
tinued for some time. Near this place he afterwards erected 
three churches and remained there for thirty years. About 
the year 520 he returned to his native country, and having 
landed at Cam, near Camsore point, in the county of Wex- 
ford, he sent messengers to Muiridach, Sovereign of Hy- 
Kinsellagh, requesting permission to settle in his territory. 
This Prince was overjoyed at the arrival of Finian, and 
granted him a site on which he erected a church and estab- 
lished a religious community at a place called Achad-abhla.t 
His next religious establishment was at Magna, in the terri- 
tory of Hy-barche, (county of Carlow) — ^here he taught 
theology and gave lectures on the holy Scriptures for seven 
years. After having formed retreats of piety and education 
in other quarters, he came to Clonard, A. D. 530, which at 

* Hymn Off. Finn. t Archddl, Mod. 



71 

that time was a dreary and frightful desert. Diermit, the 
Monarch, was his particular patron, and under his sanction 
he erected the celebrated monastery and school of Clbnard, 
which in the sixth century and in after times was the fruitful 
nursery of learned men, zealous missionaries and eminent 
saints. The Scriptures and the reading of the Fathers were 
particularly attended to in this retreat, and among those who 
received their education in it, were Columbkille, Kieran of 
Clonmacnois, Kieran of Saigar, Brendan of Clonfert, Columb 
of Tirdaglass, and numberless others.''^ In the house of 
Clonard hospitality kept pace with literature. Its fame soon 
spread beyond the shores of Ireland, and scholars in multi- 
tudes repaired thither, not only from Britain, but also from 
Graul and other parts of the Ck)ntinent. Nor did its reputa- 
tion cease after the death of the founder in 562 — Clonard 
still continued to send forth an host of learned men, while 
these missionaries were not only the ornaments of their own 
country, but moreover the luminaries of foreign and distant 
lands. In 1170 both the town of Clonard and its ancient 
monastery were plundered and laid waste by Mac Morough 
and the English under the command of- Strongbow. This 
religious establishment continued to flourish until the time of 
Edward VI, when its possessions were confiscated, and the 
monastery with its appurtenancesf was granted for ever in 
fee-farm to Thomas Cusacke and Richard Slayne, at a stipu- 
lated annual rent. J 

The next celebrated seminary established in the sixth cen- 
tury was that of Clonfert, near the Shannon, in the county 

• Usher, p. 909. 
t At the period of the general suppression of rdigious houses in Ireland, this an- 
cient establkhment was fonnd to possess, 160 Messuages with their gardens — nine 
hundred and twelve acres of arable land — twelve hundred and eighty acres of pas- 
ture—one hundred and ninety-two acres of meadow— one hundred and eighty-four 
acres of underwood, and four hundred acres of moor, a great portion of which had 
been situated in Kilbreny, Ballynlogh, and other parts of the count]^ of Kildare. — 
Auditor General, 

t Auditor Generars Office. 



72 

of Galway, founded and saperintended by that primitive 
Father of the Irish Church, St Brendan. This eminent Saint 
was descended from the princely family of Hua-Alta, in 
Kerry,*, and his birth, as has been already observed, was 
foretold by St Patrick himself. Having received the first 
rudiments of his education under Ercus, bishop of Slane, he 
repaired to larlath of Tuam, under whom he is supposed to 
have read theology. Some few years after Brendan retired to 
Britanny, where he erected a monastery and school, and 
among those who received their education under him, is men- 
tioned the learned Maclovius, bishop of the ancient see of 
Ailech or Alectum, now St Malo.f After his return fi-om 
Britanny he founded the great monastery and college of 
Clonfert,:]: while the rule which he drew up for his monks was 
held in such high estimation that it wa§ supposed to have 
been dictated by an angel. St. Brendan presided over three 
thousand monks, including, besides the community of Clon- 
fert, those who belonged to the other houses of his institute 
in various parts of Ireland. If we except the schools of 
Clonard and of Bangor, this at Clonfert deserves to be 
ranked in the first place among the sacred and literary insti- 
tutions of Ireland. The number of scholars and particularly 
of foreigners who received their education in it, soon rendered 
its name celebrated. Besides theological truths; philosophy, 
the sciences and the general literature of the day were taught 
in the schools df Clonfert; and the aid which it contributed 
in diffiising morality at home, and in establishing the reputa- 
tion of Ireland in distant countries has been acknowledged 
and deservedly eulogized by many of our ancient writers. 
Henry 0*Gormacan was the last abbot in 1540, when the 
Abbey was plundered and suppressed by Henry VIII, and its 
possessions were united to the bishopric of Clonfert.§ We 
have no exact account of these possessions, but they must 
have been very considerable. 
* Tripart. L. 3. c. 47. t UBher, p. 955. t Colgan, p. 192. § Aud. Geo. 



73 

Thb monastic school of Clohmackois, on the banks of 
the Shannon, and in the barony of Garrycastle, (King's 
county,) may be jtwtly ranked among the literary establish- 
ments of the sixth century. Its founder St. Kieran, was 
bom in the county of Meath, A. D. 607, but his parents 
were originally from Ulster. Kieran received his education 
at Clonard, after which he retired to the Monastery of St. 
Nennidius, in one of the islands of Lough-Eme, in order to 
improve himself still more in the knowledge and observance 
of monastic discipline. Having the same object in view, he 
afterwards repaired to the island of Arran, and placed him* 
self under the guidance of St Enda, whose monastery Was 
at that time considered the most rigorous in all Ireland. In 
548 Kieran removed to the western banks of the Shannon, 
where he founded the great Monastery of Clonmacnois,* on 
a site granted to him by the Monarch Dermot. The school 
attached to this monastery was celebrated particularly for 
theological literature, contemplative and ascetic exercises, 
but above all for the number of missionaries and holy persona 
whom it produced. St. Kieran died in the prime of life, and 
shortly after its erection in 649, having been cut off by a 
pestilence which in that year raged throughout Ireland. 
Although a simple priest, he is universally considered as one 
of the Fathers of the Irish Church, and to his Monastery at 
Clonmacnois together with its appendant institutions, the 
literature and morality of Ireland in the sixth century were 
eminently indebted. 

The celebrated establishment of Bangor is that to which 
the attention of the reader must now be briefly directed. Its 
founder St. Comgall was of a distinguished family of Dala- 
radia, and was bom about the year 516. Under the austere 
rule of St. Fintan at Clonenagh, he became acquainted with 
the practice of monastic discipline; after which he repaired 

• See c. ii. Century 6. 



^ 



74 

to the schools of Clonmacnois^ where he finished his edaca- 
tion and was ordained Priest. On his return to Ulster, he 
preached in several districts of that province, and in 559, 
Comgall entered Dalaradia and laid the foundation of Ben- 
chor, or as it is now called Bangor, near the bay of Carrick- 
fergus, in the county of Down.* In a short time the celeb- 
rity of this house was so great, that the original establish- 
ment could not contain the multitudes of monks and scholars 
who flocked not only from all parts of Ireland but from 
various and distant countries on the Continent, to learn 
knowledge, discipline and morality within its sacred walls. — 
The number was at one time computed at three thousand ;t 
all observing the rule which the Saint himself had drawn up, 
and acting under his instruction and superintendance. Among 
these may be noticed Cormac, King of South Leinster, and 
Columbanus,J one of the greatest men whom the Christian 
Church could boast of in that age. St. Comgall, besides his 
monastic rule, was the author of several valuable tracts on 
literature and practical morality, and is most deservedly 
ranked in the list of the Fathers of the Irish Church.^ The 
fame of the schools of Bangor continued for centuries after 
the death of its founder. St. Bernard testifies, that its name 
had been spread throughout Europe; and we are assured by 
cotemporary annalists, that while numbers repaired to Bangor 
as the seat of science and wisdom, still greater multitudes 
took shelter within its hallowed walls, and looked up to it as 
an* asylum in whose sanctuary they might rest secured from 
the angry and perilous scenes of a troublesome and a fluctu- 
ating world. William O'Dorman was the last Abbot, A. D. 
1541, when the work of national ruin commenced.)] What 

* Usher, p. 956. f Second life, c. 13. t Acta MaUc. c. 5. $ Codex Ardmadi. 

II The possessions of this religious establishment (according to an Inquisition 
taken in the reign of James I,) were thirty-one town-lands, among wliich were 
Bangor, Carogh, Ballow, Batlemajor, Caronser, Ballerohan and Ballenbamen, 
all situated in the Ards and the upper Claneboy. Likewise the two Copland islands 



75 

Henry VI 11 had left undone, Elizabeth and James I com- 
pleted; while the ancient Abbey of Bangor and that part of 
die possessions situated in Ballyegan and- Corbally were 
granted for ever in capite to Gerald Earl of Kildare.* 

By the instrumentality of these and similar establishments 
did the Christian religion make a rapid and an amazing pro- 
gress over Ireland during the sixth century. Along the 
northern coast and throughout the province of Connaught 
the number of new congregations had so considerably multi- 
plied, that the episcopal sees which had been already founded, 
were now deemed insufficient for the missionary duties of 
those districts. Besides the ancient diocess of Elphin, we 
find, in this century, four additional sees established in the 
same province; while in the North together with the territory 
of Meath, a still greater number derive their origin from the 
same period.f The triumph of the Gospel was marked with 
similar success in the principalities of Thomond and Des- 
mond. At the very extremity of the South; in rural districts 
as well as in tovms and villages, suitable edifices had been 
raised for the celebration of the divine mysteries, and thus 
were the ancient sees of Cloyne and Ross organized and 
established during the period of which we are now treating.' 
But the morality of the faithiul was that in which the glory 
of the rising Church of Ireland chiefly consisted; and many 
even of our princes, sacrificing their natural thirst for fame, 
and laying down the shield and the sceptre, retired within 
the silent walls of the monastic cell and consecrated the 
remainder of their days to the service of their God. It 
would seem as if the Almighty had, at this time, taken 
Ireland under his especial and providential care. Other 



in the bay of Carrickfergus, together with three rectories in the county of Antrim, 
and the some number in the barony of Lecale — It also possessed a town-land in the 
Isle of Man, and the advowson of all the Vicarages of the above mentioned lands. 

* Aud. Geo. t See Chap. ii. 



76 

countries were distracted either by wars, or by heresy aod 
schism. On the Continent of Europe one general scene of 
confusion prevailed* The great and ancient Roman Empire, 
once the terror of the world, was struck to its centre by 
countless hoards of barbarians, who rushed down from the 
wilds and deserts of the north and like an inundation swept 
all before them. These savage tribes, after havii^ made 
themselves masters not only of Gaul and Spain, and other 
Roman provinces to the West, but likewise of the rich and 
luxuriant plains of Italy and of Rome itself, began to sub- 
divide and form dissentions among themselves; so that the 
sword for centuries remained unsheathed — society seemed as 
it were tottering to its foundation — ^the temple, the sanctuary, 
and the altars of the Most High had been polluted, while the 
very plains of the country were crimsoned with the blood of 
its bravest inhabitants. To complete the climax of this 
scene of human desolation, schism and heresy (which are 
still greater curses than war, and which in fact are the fore* 
runners of war,) were making rapid strides amongst them. 
The most ancient and venerable and fundamental truths of 
the Christian religion had been blasphemously assailed; and 
novelties hitherto unheard of — the wild chimeras of disap- 
pointed apostates were about to be set forth and substituted 
in their place. Such had been the melancholy picture which 
the great Continent of Europe presented. In the mean time 
Ireland viras a land of peace, religion and happiness — ^her 
monarchs were practical Christians — ^her hierarchy was estab- 
lished — her religious institutions were rising up numerous 
and magnificent — her schools of learning had their halls and 
gates thrown open for the welcome reception of all who had 
a desire to come and taste of the fountain of knowledge — 
while the board of hospitality was spread out and plentifully 
furnished for the traveller and the stranger, for the poor and 
the destitute. Hence it was that foreigners in multitudes fled 
for refuge and for education to Ireland during the sixth and 



77 

succeeding centuries; and to this circumstance must most 
prdbably be attributed that anxious desire which our great 
saints had of leaving their own country and of going forth to 
preach the Gospel through the wilds and deserts of distant 
lands. Among the number of these extraordinary men, S.S. 
Columbkille and Columbanus eminently deserve to be noticed, 
and to their history the remainder of this chapter shall be 
devoted. 

Columba or Columbkille was of a princely race, having 
been descended in a direct line from Niall of the nine 
hostages,* and was bom at Gartan, a district in the county of 
Donegal, A.D. 621. At an early age he repaired to the 
schools of St. Finian of Maghbile, in the county of Down, 
and afterwards attended the lectures of St. Finian of Clonard, 
where by his intense application to sacred literature and his 
extraordinary rigorous mode of life he elicited the admiration 
of that master and model of saints. On his return to Tir- 
connell, the country of bis birth, Columba founded a sump- 
tuous monastery on an eminence near Lough-foyle, called 
Daire-Colgaic, whence is derived the name of the present 
city of Derry.f This establishment having been committed 
to the care of the elder monks, the present barony of Bally- 
cowen, in the King's county, became the next scene of his 
missionary labours; and here he erected the great Monastery 
of Durrogh, A. D. 550. During his residence at Durrogh, 
several prelates admiring his sanctity, judged him worthy of 
the episcopal order, and sent him with letters of approbation 
to St. Etchen then residing at Clain-bile, in the county of 
Meath. Columba was received by the Prelate with marks of 
great kindness, and shortly after was ordained priest; the 
Saint himself having an objection to be raised to an higher 
rank in the Church. This event occurred A. D. 651, and in 
the 30th year of his age. To this period must be referred the 

• Usher, p. 689. t Sampson's Statist. Survey, p. 472. 



78 

date of the numerous monastic foundations, particularly in 
Ulster, Sligo, Roscommon and Meath, which then and in 
after times constituted the glory and ornament of the Colum- 
bian institute in Ireland. The light of Christianity had not 
yet beamed upon the Northern Picts. That martial and 
powerful people had for ages been the scourge and terror of 
surrounding nations, but having been weakened by constant 
wars and successive revolutions, their dominion became gra- 
dually circumscribed, and about the middle of the sixth cen- 
tury their possesions were confined to some of the Hebrides, 
and to that portion of modem Scotland which branches to 
the north of the great and wild range of the Grampian 
mountains. Columba, viewing with pity the forlorn state of 
this nation and the still more desolate condition of his own 
countrymen who were settled in Argyle and the adjacent 
tracts,* determined on proceeding amongst them and laying 
the basis of a new and extensive mission. For this purpose 
he set out from Ireland in 563, accompanied by twelve com- 
panions, and having arrived at Hy, a grant of that island 
was made to him by his relative, Conall, King of the Alba- 
nian Scots.f In the island of Hy he erected a monastery 
which afterwards became his favourite establishment, and 
having arranged its a£fairs, Columba departed with a few 
companions, and directed his course towards the Pictish ter- 
ritories. Bride, who was then Monarch of that nation, kept 
his court at Inverness. This Prince on being acquainted 
with Columba's intentions, sternly refused even the permission 
of an audience, and gave directions that the gates of his 
castle should be locked. This order was careftilly obeyed, 
but as Adamnan writes, the Saint placed his hand on the 

* It may be proper to remark that the Scots or Irish had formed an establishment 
in North Britain, Albania, A.D. 503. The foundation of this Scottish Kingdom 
was laid by Loarn son of £rk and his brother Fei^us, who became his immediate 
successor.— -OTlaherty, Ogygia, p. 472. 

t Smith, Life, p. 18. 



79 

bolt: at the name of Christ, the massy irons gave way 
and the gate flew open for the reception of the man of God.* 
Bride very soon after embraced the Christian faith, while his 
conversion necessarily contributed to prepare the way for the 
more successful and triumphant progress of our Columbian 
missionaries. The Orkney islands were next visited by our 
Saint, and here also the cross of Christ was planted and his 
Gospel embraced by multitudes. But the Hebrides or West- 
em Islands became the principal scene of his missionary 
labours, and to the conversion of these wild and sequestered 
tractS'all the zeal of Columba seemed to be chiefly directed. 
The inhabitants of Himba were soon gained over to the faith. 
Elna was next honoured by the erection of several churches. 
In the island of Ethica, he laid the foundation of a splendid 
monastery, the government of which was committed to his 
disciple Baithen — and finally he visited Skey, where the faith 
of Christ made rapid progress, and several religious institu- 
tions were soon seen rising from their foundations.i* In the 
mean time Columba paid frequent visits to the British Scots, 
whose ecclesiastical affairs he superintended, and among 
whom he formed several establishments, the most consider- 
able of which stood near Lough-awe in Argyle. His princi- 
pal missionary labours were, however, devoted to the Western 
Isles and to the Pictish territories. These places he supplied 
with churches and enriched with monastic foundations, which 
having been subjected to his own rule, became at the same 
time seminaries of learning and nurseries of saints. Adopt- 
ing the system which he had been taught at Clonard, this 
apostolic man during his missionary career took care to em- 
ploy the two great ordinary mediums ordained by Providence 
for the conversion of mankind-7- gratuitous education and a 
priesthood disengaged from the world and bound down by 
strict and solemn obligations. By means of these and with 

♦ L. 2. c. 35. t Cumineus, Vit. 



80 

the aid of heaven, did the cross and the Gospel at length 
prevail; the long and dismal reign of idolatry was brought to 
a close and compelled to give way to the Kingdom of Christy 
and our Saint was ever afterwards revered as the patron and 
Apostle of these extensive regions. 

In the year 490, St Columba paid a visit to Ireland, at 
which time an assembly of the Kingdom was held at Drum* 
ceat, in the county of Derry.* Aidus was then Monarch of 
Ireland, and the Saint was pressingly invited to attend this 
national convention. One of the principal objects for which 
it had been summoned' was the suppression of the Bardic 
order; against which a general outcry was at that time raised 
throughout the country. The merits and importance of that 
body have been variously recognized by many of our ancient 
annalists; its nature and offices are thus described by a 
modern writer.f "The Irish Nation^ greedy of praise and 
very solicitous about its history, was accustomed from its 
origin, to hold in high estimation, professors of antiquity, of 
whom there was a great number, and who were called Anti- 
quarians or Poets. It was their official duty to describe the 
transactions, wars and triumphs of kings, princes and heroes; 
to register the genealogies and prerogatives of noble families, 
and to mark and distinguish the boundaries of districts and 
lands. They wrote in verse preferably to prose, partly for 
the purpose of helping the memory, and partly to guard 
against the diffiisiveness of prosaic composition." The 
charges alleged against them were, that their numbers had 
multiplied to such an extent that they became an intolerable 
nuisance to the country; and again, that their insufferable 
impudence frequently allowed them to extol, in the most 
exaggerated strains, such of the nobility as paid them well 
and entertained them hospitably; while others who refused 
to comply with their exorbitant demands were sure to be 

♦ Tr. Th. p. 375. t O'Doonel, L. 3. c. 2. 



81 

satirised and vilified. In shorty that they roamed about the 
country in groups, were literally billeted on the people, and 
required as a right the best of every thing; a demand which 
the inhabitantSi overawed by these lampooners had seldom 
the fortitude to refuse. On these charges the whole order 
would most probably have been suppressed, had not Columba 
interfered. Upon his advice it was finally agreed that they 
should be reduced to a limited number, and placed under 
such regulations that they could no longer be an anoyance to 
the public* From Drumceat St. Columbkille repaired to 
his favourite Monasteries of Deny and of Durrogh. He 
afterwards proceeded to Clonmacnois, where he was received 
with great marks of respect and veneration. His next visit 
was to St. Comgall of Bangor, and from these he went to 
Coleraine; the inhabitants of which assembled in multitudes 
to see the Saint and to receive his benediction. This is the 
last place in Ireland where we find St. Columba. He returned 
to Hy, and notwithstanding his great age he continued to 
govern that and his other numerous religious establishments. 
Frequently did he pray that the Lord would be pleased to call 
him to himself at the expiration of thirty years after his first 
anival at Hy; and that period having now elapsed, Columba 
looked with hope and joy to his departure from this world, 
but was apprized in a vision that his presence on earth was 
still necessary for four years longer. T3ie happy day was 
at length approaching, and the Saint went accompanied by his 
attendant Diermit to bless the bam belonging to the Monas- 
tery. Having acquainted Diermit that said day would be his 
last in this world, he ascended an eminence and with uplifted 
hands gave his blessing to the Monastery. On his return he 
sat down in an adjoining hut and copied a part of the 
Psalter, but having come to that passage in the 33rd Psalm, 
"Inquirentes autem Dominum, non deficient omni bono," he 

• O'Donoel, L. 3. c. 7. 



82 

stopped and said ''let Baithen write the lemainder/' The 
Saint afterwards attended yespers in the choir and then re- 
tired to his cell| where he reclined on his bed of stone and 
deliTered instructions which were at a future time to be com* 
municated to the brethren. When the hour for midnight 
prayers had arrived, he hastened to the Church and was the 
first to enter it Diermit appeared soon after and found him 
hi a reclining posture before the altar and at the point of 
death. Instantly the brethren were assembled in grief and 
tears around him, but the Saint raising his eyes looked upon 
them with a bright and cheerful countenance; and then ¥rith 
the assistance of Diermit, raising his right hand, he gave his 
last benediction to the community, and resigned his happy 
soul into the hands of his Saviour on the morning of Sunday 
the 9th of June, A. D. 697, and in the 76th year of his age,* 
The memory of this great and extraordinary Saint will be 
ever held in the most profound veneration not only in Ireland, 
but also in Scotland, the Hebrides and over the western 
world. Although but a simple priest, St. Columba possessed 
for many years an ecclesiastical jurisdiction even over the 
bishops of these countries,^ and this singular privilege was, 
as a mark of respect for his memory, enjoyed by his succes- 
sors for a considerable time after his death. He drew up a 
monastic rule which was scrupulously observed in all the 
houses of his institute.^: St. Columbkille composed several 
tracts both in prose and verse, abounding with great biblical 
research and theological learning. Colgan has published 
three of his latin hymns, the first of which after commencing 
with the Eternity, Unity and Trinity of God, branches out 
into several sacred subjects, and concludes with an awful 
description of the day of judgment, the resurrection of man- 
kind and the future state of the just and unjust. Besides his 
hymns, he has also left a beautiful tract in honour of St. 

* Adamnan, L. 3.— Annals of Innisfal. f Bede, L. 3. c. 4. X Tr. Th. p. 471. 



83 

Kieran of ClonmacnoiB. His last ivork was a life of St. 
Patrick, iinitten in Irish; of which mention is made several 
times by the authors of the Tripartite. With respect to those 
prophesies which commonly appear under the sanction of his 
name, there seems to be no settled opinion among antiqua* 
nans. Usher, Colgan and others receive some of them as 
genuine and many of them they reject as spurious.* St 
Golumbkille was succeeded in the government of Hy by 
Baithen, and while his institute contributed to the salvation 
of thousands, it stood for centuries after, the glory and 
bright ornament of the Western Church. 

Hext to the history of St. Columbkille, that of the great 
CoLUMBANVS dcservcs to be noticed. Columbanus was a 
native of Leinster and was bom about the year 669 — ^when a 
youthy he was placed under the care of the venerable Senile; 
a man at that time, very eminent for his sanctity and his 
knowledge of the holy Scriptures. While under the instruc* 
tion of this master, Columbanus formed the determination of 
embracing the monastic state, and for that purpose repaired 
to Bangor, where he remained for many years under the dis-> 
cipline of the holy Abbot St. Comgall. During this time 
Columbanus gave many and strong proofs not only of a 
powerful mind and of superior talents, but likewise of a most 
holy disposition and an ardent desire to please his God and 
consecrate the remainder of his days to bis sacred service. 
With this object in view, he resolved to retire to some foreign 
country, and having communicated his intentions to St. 
Comgall, twelve of the brethren were selected and adopted 
by him as the companions of all his future spiritual labours. 
The provinces of Gaul and of the whole south of Europe 
presented at this period a most frightful picture. Even as 
yet, the breaches occasioned by invasion without and much 
more by discontent and rebellion within had by no means 

• Tr. Thi p. 474. 



84 

been repaired — society appeared unsettled — ^law, subordina- 
tion, every material requisite for its frame-work seemed to 
have been wanting, while infidelity and licentiousness, the 
usual attendants on war, made awful strides and prevailed 
almost universally from the throne to the cottage. Columba- 
nus and his companions after making a short stay in Britain, 
sailed for the coast of Gaul, and about the year 590 arrived 
on the frontiers of Bui^ndy. The neighbouring territory of 
the Vosges was that which the Saint and his companions had 
now selected, and having penetrated into this wild and deso- 
late region, they took up their abode in a deserted fort called 
Ana^rates, situated in the present Franche-comte. In this 
solitude they endured the greatest distress, having lived 
merely on a limited supply of wild herbs and a species 
of apples which that wilderness had produced. The fame of 
their sanctity had soon spread through the surrounding coun- 
try, and multitudes of people came to hear the word of life 
from the lips of our Saint; while many of them presented 
themselves and prayed to be admitted into his community. 
It was soon found necessary to erect a monastery; and a site 
was fixed upon named Luxovium now Luxen in the heart of 
the forest, about eight miles distant from Anagrates.* The 
number of postulants increasing daily, and among them not 
a few of the nobility, a second establishment was founded at 
a place, which, on account of its number of springs, he 
called Ad-fontanas, (Fontaines.) For the use of these estab- 
lishments Columbanus drew up a rule, which was afterwards 
received and observed in France before that of St. Benedict 
had been introduced into that country .f The Columbian 
constitutions were approved of and highly conmiended by 
the Oallican bishops in the Council of Macon, A. D. 627, 
and afl;er having been for many years the rule of several 
monasteries not only in France, but also in Italy, Grermany 

* Fleury, Hist. £ccl. L. 35. f Biblioth. Patr. Tom. 12. 



85 

and Switzerland, became at length modified and incorporated 
with those of St. Benedict. Columbanus had not been very 
long at Luxen, when he had to endure one of those storms 
which not unfrequently fall to the lot of zealous and holy 
men. This persecution was set on foot by Theodoric King of 
Burgundy, or rather by the powerful though secret agency of 
the Queen-dowt^er Brunchant.* For some time Theodoric 
had treated the Saint with great marks of respect, was wont 
frequently to visit him in his solitude, and Ustened with at- 
tention to the instructions which he was always sure to receive. 
But the good impressions which the Saint's councils had 
made on the mind of the King were as ispeedily removed by 
the bad example and wicked designs of the Queen-dowager. 
This haughty and irreligious woman had long held the reins 
of power in her hands — ^the King's marriage was recom- 
mended and settled upon — a rival in the court could not be 
endured — and to prevent the possibility of such an occurrence 
every means were employed to debauch the morals of the 
young Prince and to lead him into the most shameful excesses. 
By her intrigues the palace was converted into a den of pros- 
titutes; decency, order and religion were set at nought, and, 
as is generally the case, the example was followed in other 
quarters, so that the infection was making its way rapidly 
through the different classes of society. Columbanus remon- 
strated with Theodoric, but his admonitions were unheeded. 
At that time the court had been removed to Spissia. Thither 
the Saint repaired, but could not be prevailed upon to stop at 
the palace or in any of the mansions belonging to the King. 
Theodoric, however, on hearing of his arrival, vras resolved 
to receive him with becoming respect; the servants of the 
royal household were in attendance, a sumptuous repast was 
got ready, and wines of delicious flavour with other liqueurs 
were laid before him. But these tokens of respect, however 

• Jonasi c, 17. 



flattering to others, were not such as Columbanus would ad- 
mire, nor had they a single charm by which he could even for 
a moment be diverted from the high object which he had in 
view. ^* What meaneth this munificence— (observes the Saint) 
why those costly presents, which to us must be unacceptable? 
It is written — ^'The Most High rejects the gift of the 
impious'* — nor is it meet that the servants of God should be 
defiled with such viands." ' The King and Brunchant made 
most solemn promises of reform; scarcely, however, had the 
Saint departed, when the irr^ularities of the court were re- 
newed and scenes of vice and profligacy of a still daricer 
shade were introduced. As a last resource, Columbanus 
addressed a strong letter to the King, denouncing his licen** 
tious conduct and refusing to hold communion with him, un- 
less he should give, at once, ample signs of repentance and 
abandon his wicked career. This remonstrance would most 
probably have had effect, were it not for the influence of 
Brunchant. That wicked woman at once enraged, and still 
anxious to maintain her power even at the expense of the 
royal character, had used every means to inflame the pas- 
sion of Theodoric, and so far did she succeed that the King 
himself attended by his courtiers and guards set out for 
Luxen, determined on banishing Columbanus and the com- 
munity from his dominions.f Theodoric forced his way into 
the cloister — an armed soldiery were now stationed in the 
house of prayer, while the Saint himself remaining in the 
sanctuary and with the firmness of a martyr boldly addressed 
the King. — ^**If (he exclaims) thou, Sire, art come ^hither to 
violate the discipline already established, or to destroy the 
dwellings of the servants of God, know that in heaven there 
is a just and an avenging power; thy kingdom shall be taken 
(rom thee, and both thou and thy royal race shall be cut off* 
and destroyed on the earth." The denunciation alarmed 

* Eccl. c. xxxiv. V. 23. t JonaSi c. 16. 



87 

Theodoric; he mtiidrew and retired to his palace; however a 
body of armed men were soon after directed to proceed to 
Luxen and expel Golnmbanns together with such of the 
monks as were from Ireland out of Theodoric's dominions. — 
Those members of the community, who had been natives of 
France were permitted to remain, and the Saint on his de- 
parture, amidst the tears and lamentations of his brethren^ 
besought them to be of good heart, for that the Lord would 
be to them a Father, and reward them with mansions into 
which the workers of sacrilege can never expect to enter. St. 
Columbanus departed from the Vosges in the year 610, after 
having resided about twenty years in that country.* The 
Captain of the guard, Ragamund, had orders to escort the 
religious to the coast, which commission was executed with 
great cruelty. The journey was performed by night as well 
as by day, and having at length reached Nevers, they were 
compelled to embark on boats then plying on the Loire. 
Passing by Tours, they arrived with great difficulty at Nantz, 
and here they remained for some days waiting for a passage 
to Ireland. At length a vessel was found ready to sail, and 
the Saint with his companions was put on board — scarcely 
however, had they reached the ocean, when a violent storm 
arose, by which the vessel was driven back and cast on the 
shore, where it lay stranded during the night. The captain 
and his crew conceiving that this misfortune arose in conse- 
quence of having the Saint and his brethren on board, refused 
to carry them any farther, and accordingly they were left oa 
shore, when immediately the storm abated and the ship put 
out to sea. Columbanus recogni2ing the will of heaven in 
these events, and conscious of the important services which 
he might render to the ign(H*ant and unsettled inhabitants of 
that region, proceeded with his companions to Nantz, and 
without much interruption bent his course to the kingdom of 

• Flcury, L. 37. c. 6. 



88 

Austrasia, then governed by Theodobert, brother of the 
Vosgesian Theodoric. His ulterior object was, to form a 
settlement in some part of Italy near the Alps. Thither, 
therefore, he proceeded, and during his journey was kindly 
received by several bishops and experienced great hospitality 
from Clotharius, a relative of Theodoric and King of the 
Soissons. When the Saint had entered the dominions of Theo- 
dobert, (Austrasia,) he was introduced to the King and was re- 
ceived with marked respect and distinction. Having, after a 
few days, embarked on the Rhine, he continued his route to 
Mentz, where at the request of the bishop he preached to the 
people and would have been detained, but his love for the 
desert and his glowing zeal for the conversion of its inhabit- 
ants beii^ still paramount, he was, at his own request, allowed 
to proceed on his journey. At the desire of the good King, 
Theodobert, he travelled along the lake Zurich in Switzerland, 
and in the Canton of Zug converted a great number of souls 
to the faith of Christ. From thence Columbanus departed to 
Arizona near the lake of Constance; but this district having 
been tolerably supplied with missionaries, our Saint directed 
his course to the ancient Brigantium, (Br^entz) then in- 
habited by an idolatrous people. The holy Missioner here 
met with an immediate repulse — judging it, therefore, more 
prudent to commence his labours with the Suevi or ancient 
Swiss, who dwelt in the adjoining lands, he removed amoi^t 
them; and by numerous miracles and incessant preaching, 
aided by the good example of his community, he ultimately 
succeeded in converting the entire population of this seques- 
tered and hitherto unfrequented territory.* Returning to 
Bregentz with his brethren and a number of the Suevi, 
Columbanus entered their pagan temple on the day of a 
solemn festival — ^he addresed the people and called on the 
name of Christ, when as the historian relates, the three great 

• Fleury, L. 37.— Jonas, c. 26. 



brazeir images which their ancestors worsUpped were npset' 
Und the leading men and principal portion of the inhabit- 
ants embraced the faith. At their request, the Saint after- 
wards erected a monastery in their neighbouirhood, and fol- 
lowing the tsustom of Ireland^ bald a seminary annexed to it( 
Which in afteir tim^ bet^am^ exfcfeedihgly celebrated. At this 
period^ hfe felt a stfong desire to preach the Goispel to the 
Venetii or Sblavi, who were Bkewise ignorant of the true 
(jod, but in consequence of a vision, hfe perceived' that the 
iimie had not yei colne for the bonversibn bf that people;"* 

St. Gdlumbanus now proceeds on his journey to Italy ftnd 
krHv^ in Milan> about the year 6l!2.f The AHan hertesy; 
jalthbtigfa ably refuted by various writers and solehihly bon^ 
detaaed by the Council of Nil^e, Was still upheld and its 
iinpioud tenets advocate by a considerable pbrtibn of the 
eastern church* Against theise helretics Columbanus pul>- 
lishieid a very learnt tract, ih which he diehibnstrated thti 
divinity of J^us Christ both frotn the authority of the sacred 
Scripture and the unanimous tradition of ages.;}; At thiii 
period^ likewise, the celebrated questi^on of the thre<6 chapter^ 
had caused an unusual sensatibn all over Italy. These pro- 
ductions were condemned in the second general Council of 
Constantinople^ yiet the cont^versy connectied with them; 
was ev^n now, likfe the waves of a troubled obean, beating 
high and festlesM^ and espe^bially in the district of Milan: 
This it Was which occasiontsd Sti Coluinbanu^^tb write hii 
celebrated epistle td Pope Bonifadei IV.^ tn this very abfe 
and learned document, he addresses Boniface as the most 
honoured Head of all the churches — as the most exalted 
Prelate, and as the I^s^tbr of pastors.|j He then apologizeti 

• Jonas, e: 28. \ M^aratoii Annal. Dlt«I. f Joins; c. 29. $ MabMoh Anna!. L. ii; 

I The title of the Epistle runs thus : " Pulcherimo Ommiim totins Europe Ec* 
clesUuruin Capiti--^Pap8e prsdulsi — pracelso Presali — Pastoram Pastori — Rever- 
eodiisiaM) Speculitori^hanitliximis ce]8iiBmio> minimus mazimo, agrestis urbanoj 



90 

for having troubled his Holiness, declaring that he had done 
60 at the urgent request of the King, (Arnulf) and after humbly 
imploring him to employ his authority and put an end to the 
6chism> he concludes by saying: ''For we, Irish, are disciples 
of St. Peter and St Paul and of all the divinely inspired 
canonical writers; adhering constantly to the faith and apos- 
tolic doctrine. Among us neither Jew^ heretic or schismatic 
can be foundy but the Catholic faith, entire and unshaken, 
precise^ as we have received it from you, who are the sttcces- 
sors of the holy Apostles. For as I have already said, we are 
attached to the chair of St Peter, and although Rome is 
great and renowned, yet with us it is great and distinguished 
only on account of that Apostolic chair. Through the two 
Apostles of Christ ye are almost celestial, and Rome is the 
head of the churches of the world."* In the year 613 St. 
Columbanus, at the earnest request of the King> founded the 
celebrated Monastery of Bobbio, in a magnificently romantic 
part of the Apennines«t In the mean tiixie Theodoric was cut 
off, just as he had been on the point of waging war against his 
relative Clotharius. Two of his sons were slain and the third 
was banished the kingdom. The infamous Brunchant was 
put to death by Clotharius, who accordingly ascended the 
throne and became Monarch of all France A. D. 613.J The 
Saint thus tried in the crucible and exhausted with labouo 
spent the remainder of his days in the holy retreat of Bobbio, 
and died on the 21st of November, A. D. 616, and in the 
72nd year of his age. 

micrologus elequentissimo, eztremus primo, peregrinus indigent, pauperculiu pne* 
potenti- (minim dictuT nova res,) rara avis scribere audit Bonifacio Patri Palum* 
bus."-— Vide CoUectanea Sacra— ap Fleming. 

* This passage deserves to be noticed. It affords another convincing proof of the 
doctrine of the ancient Irish Church relative to the supremacy of the see of Rome 
and the source whence its ec'clesiastical jurisdiction had been derived. — £p. ad Bon. 
Vide Appendix No. !• 

t Mabillon, Annal, Bened. L. 10. X Abreg^ Chronol. 



91 

It would be impossible in this review to enlarge specificalty 
on the learned, theological and classical writings of this great 
and holy man. An analysis of his works is to be had in 
Dupin's Bibliotheque; and an accurate and erudite inquiry 
into that portion of his works which are lost, may be found 
in the " Histoire Litteraire de la France" by the Benedictines.* 
The memory of this great Saint will be for ever revered in the 
Western Church; and while in Ireland his name shall be 
handed down with admiration and love, the pages of Gallicau 
history will furnish a splendid and an immortal record of the 
many signal services rendered to that nation by the zeal, la-» 
hours and writings of the great and ever-blessed Columbanus.f 

In this manner did the Church of Ireland send forth hei: 
missionaries to distant countries. Meanwhile a bountiful and 
an all-ruling Providence supplied her with an abundance of 
holy and learned pastors, who both in solitude and in the 
bustle of life — ^in the city and in the cell were leading thou- 
sands to heaven and shedding new and additional lustre 
around the cross of Christ. There wa^ not perhaps a single 



* Accordmg to Fleming, (Collect. Sacr.) hii works consUt of seventeen dis« 
courses on varioos subjects appertaining to a spiritual life. His treatise on Canon- 
ical penances (De Mensura Penitentianim). His Monastic Rule, with the Re« 
gula de quot'idtanis Monachorum. Instructions on the Eight principal Vices.-— 
And five Epistles, the first of which is addressed to Pope Boniface, the second to 
the Fathere of the Gallican Synod on the subject of the Pasch. The third to his 
disciples and Monks. 'Ilie fourth to Pope Boniface IV., and the fifth to Pope 
Gregory the Great. To these are added a valuable collection of his poetical 
writings. 

f The Monastic Rule of St. Columbanus (which may properly be said to have 
crowned all his labours with success,) consists of ten Chapters, in the following 
order : 1. De Obcdientia, (and be it remarked, this forms the grand basis of hia 
entire Monastic System.) 2. De Taciturnitate. 3. De Cibo et Potu. 4. De 
Copiditate calcanda. 5. De Vanitate calcanda. 6. De Castitate. 7. De Cursu 
(sen de Officio divino). 8. De Discretione. 9. De Mortificatione. 10. De Per« 
fectione Monachi. To this^Rule is subjoined his Regula Cceoobialis, sou de 
Quotidianis poenitentiis Monachorum, in fifteen Chapters. This latter Rule 
appears to be an abridgment of his Penitential, and on many points presents an 
exact coincidence with the more recent Penitential of Commian.— Collect. Sacr. 



92 

national church in the Christian world which could shew forth 
8uch an host of literaryi zealous and sanctified men as could 
the Church of Ireland at that period. This is a truth well 
supported by historical evidence and shall be more fully iUus* 
trated in the following chapters. 



CHAPTER IL 

Successors of St. Patrich^JEpiseopal SeesSeligious fosMf 
dations of the sixth century. 

The Metropolitan See of Armagh was in this century 
governed by eight eminent and learned prelates in regular 
succession. It is, indeed^ to be regretted that their acts, to« 
gether with other important events connected with the history 
of that See have not be^ handed down to us. These invalu- 
able documents were^ aks, sacrificed to the fury of those 
angiy times, wh^ the name of religion was made use of as 
a pretext for plunder^ and when men of another creed and of 
another country, after laying prostrate 4iie independence of 
the Nation, attempted to bury in its ruins every record of 
that venerable religion in which their forefathers gloried and 
for which they were willing to shed their blood. Dubtach or 
DuACH I, who was Primate of Ireland at the close of the 
fifth century, died in 613, and was succeeded by Alild I, 
and AxiLD II, the latter of whom, after an incumbency of 
ten years, died A. D. 636. Alild was followed by Duace II, 
'descended from CoUa-Huas, an ancient King of Ireland. 
Buach held the See for twelve years. His successor was 
David, of the illustrious house of Hua-Fiachraigh of Ulster, 
and called in the Psalter of Cashel, Fiachrius. David 
governed the see only three years and upon his demise 
FsinuMin Fion was elected Archbishop of Armagh.* This 
Prelate was a great encourager of learning imd enlarged the 
Metropolitan Seminary to which he was a great benefactor. 
He was likewise most active in organizing the new episcopal 

* Ware, Bishop» at Arrnsgh. 



94 

sees, ^hich in this century began to spring up in every 
province throughout the kingdom. Feidlimid died in 578, 
and had for his successor, Cairlan, a native of Hy-Nielan, 
in the county of Armagh. Cairlan's incumbency continued 
for ten years, and that of his successor Eochaid for the same 
period; when upon the death of the latter in 698, Sekach 
was consecrated Archbishop of Armagh* Several annalists 
make mention of Senach as a learned man, and he is said to 
have written some valuable tracts on the Scriptures and writ- 
ings of the Fathers, none of which are extant. After having 
governed the Metropolitan See for twelve years, Senach died 
A.D.610.* 

The most ancient episcopal establishment of this century 
was the Sbb of Drohore, founded about the year 514, by 
St. Golman.t This distinguished Prelate was a descendant 
of the Dalaradian family, and after having studied the sacred 
Scriptures under St. Ailbe of Emly, he returned to his native 
province and erected a monastery on the banks of the Locha, 
now the Lagan, in Dromore. Several eminent men received 
their education under St. Colman, among wl)om may be 
mentioned the great Finian of Clonard. We have no account 
of the succession in this see until about the close of the 
twelfth century, for which reason some writers have been led 
to conjecture that Dromore had, during the intermediate 
period, been united to Armagh.J This opinion, however, 
shall be examined in its proper place. The year of St. 
Colman's death has not been ascertained, but his festival is 
celebrated on the 7th of June. 

The see of Ossort derives its foundation from St. Kieran, 
A. D. 538. Kieran was bom in Ossory and after having 
spent many years under St. Finian of Clonard, he retired to 
a solitary spot, since called Saigar, in the territory of Ely 
O'Carrol, where he erected a monastery. The schools at- 

• Tr. Th. p. W2. f Usher, p. 1066. t Ware, Bishops, 



95 

tached to this establishment were so celebtated that students 
resorted here in numbers, and in a very few years Saigar (in 
the now King's county) became a city of great distinction.* 
The Ossorians being a martial and an ancient people, and 
very strongly attached to the institutions of their ancestors, 
were not so easily rescued from the errors of paganism as 
were the inhabitants of other territories. St. Kieran, hoWever, 
preached amongst them and with wonderful success. After 
having been consecrated bishop, he fixed his see at Saigan 
It was afterwards translated to Aghaboe, in the Queen's 
county, and finally to the city of Kilkenny-^^a circumstantial 
account of this translation together with the history of this 
ancient and celebrated See will be found in our review of the 
twelfth and succeeding centuries. St. Kieran died about the 
year 550, and his memory is revered on the 5th of March, 
the anniversary of his death.f Some English martyrologists 
pretend to maintain that St. Kieran died and was interred at 
Padstow in Cornwall, but this assertion: is merely a fac* 
simile of the Olastonbury fabrications regarding St Patrick, 
and is repugnant to the concurrent testimony of all our 
ancient writers. Equally groundless is the opinion of those, 
who assert that this Saint was an acting prelate in Ireland 
previously to the arrival of SU Patrick. The above-mentioned 
date relative to his decease, unaided by a single circumstance 
is clearly sufficient to overthrow this absurd, unsupported, 
chimerical hypothesis. St. Kieran was buried at Saigar, 
where his virtues have been recorded and his memory revered 
with the most profound gratitude and devotion. 

Ths Seb of Tuam was established about the year 550. St 
larlath, a descendant of the noble house of Clonmacnie, was 
its founder, and was bom about the beginning of the sixth 
century. His first establishment was at Cluainfois not far 
distant from Tuam; at which place he erected a celebrated 

* First life, c 6. f Annals Innisf. 



96 

monastery and school. By the advice of St. Brendan of 
Clonferty he removed to Tuam, where he was Consecrated 
Bishop and established his See.* Besides being master of a 
spiritual life, larlath was esteemed a very learned man and 
among the number of his scholars is mentioned Colman, son 
of Lenine, sumamed Mitine, the sainted foiinder of the See of 
Cloyne; and St. Brendan. The day of his death as marked 
in several calendars is the 26th of December, but the festival 
is observed in the diocess of Tuam on the 6th of June. This 
See was raised to the rank of an Archdiocess at the Council 
of Kells in 1152; the particular account of which, together 
with a catalogue of its suffragans must be reserved for the 
history of that period. The remains of St. larlath were pre- 
served in a silver shrine, and deposited at Tuam in a capella, 
called from thence Tempkne^tcrinf or the chapel of the 
shrine. 

Ths See qf Clokard, jfamous for the great monastery and 
school of St. Finian, was founded about the year 652. In 
after times the bishops of this See were called Camorbans or 
successors of St. Finian, for which reason Colgan and others 
suppose that Finian was the founder of the See: however, in 
the list given us by the four Masters, Finian is simply styled 
Abbot,t and in the lessons of his office, there is no mention 
whatever made of his episcopal rank, St. Senach his successor 
was unquestionably Bishop of Clonard;:]; he governed the See 
thirty-six years and died on the 21 st of August, A. D. 588. 
It may be proper to remark that the county of Meath, in 
which Clonard is situated, comprehended in ancient times 
several episcopal sees, viz., Clonard, Duleek, Slane,Kells, Dun- 
shaghlin. Trim, Skrine Ardbraccan, and Fore; all of which, ex- 
cept Duleek and Kells, were united to Clonard before the. year 
1152. Kells and Duleek became in like manner united 
to it in the 13th century. In the year 1206 and under the in- 

• Ware, Bbhope. t See alw A. A. S. S. p. 40«. | rmi«n*s Acts, c. 19. 



97 

cmnbency of Simon Rochfort, the See was translated from 
Clonard to Newtown near Trim, where a Cathedral Church 
was erected, and from this time its Prelates assumed per- 
manently the title of Bishops jf Meath.* 

The See op Clonpert was founded by St. Moena about 
the year 660. Passing over the confused variety of opinion 
which prevails among our annalists regarditig the history of 
this Saint, the probability is, liiat he was a native of Brit^ 
anny, and came over with St. Brendan on his return from 
that country to Ireland.^ The Calendar of Cashel styles St. 
Moena Bishop of Clonfert and Comorban^ or successor of St. 
Brendan. Hence, some were of opinion that St. Brendan was 
the first Bishop of that See; a conjecture completely at va- 
riance with the Annals of Ulster, the authority of the Four 
Masters, and other high documents. The fact is, the estab^ 
lishment at Clonfert became in a few years so extensive, that 
a Bishop was considered indispensably necessary for the pur'^ 
pose of ordaining missionaries and of assisting St. Brendan 
in his ecclesiastical government; upon his recommendation, 
therefore, St. Moena was consecrated Bishop, and afterwardB 
founded the See. The Cathedral of Clonfert was in those 
days noted for its Seven Altars, while the death of the 
founder is thus marked in the Ulster Annals, '^ Moena, 
Bishop of Confart'BreTiain, Slept>'' on the 1st of March, 
A. D. 571. 

The See of Achokrt had for its founder St. Nathi, a dis-* 
ciple of St. Finian *of Clonard, and placed at Achonry by 
that Saint about the year 560.% Following the example of 
his master, Nathi erected a Monastery and a* celebrated 
school, in which St. Fechin of Fore, and other eminent men 
received their ecclesiastical education* The Bishops of this 
See were called Leinicences, from the district in which it was 
situated; but the catalogue of the succession is incomplete 

• See Cent. XIII. t Colgan at 2eih Feb. $ Ware's Antiq. c. 29, 



98 

until the year 1170. The year in which the founder died has 
not been accurately ascertained: his festival is celebrated in 
the Diocess of Achonry on the 9th of August. 

The See of Killala^ on ^e left bank of the river Moy, 
was founded by St. Muredach, of the royal house of Leogaire. 
This Saint was not, as some writers have imagined, contem- 
porary with St. Patrick; on the contrary, Colgan in tracing 
his d^ent from Leogaire, brings him down several years 
later.* Colgan's authority acquires additional weight from 
the fact that Muredach was one of those persons who waited 
on St. Columbkill at Drumceat, for the purpose of paying 
their respects to the great Apostle of the Hebrides. The 
Bishops of this See were sometimes called Tir-Amalgadenses, 
from the district itself, and its ancient possessions were con- 
firmed, at the request of the incumbent, Donagh, by Pope 
Innocent III., in 1 198.t The year of the foundation, as well 
as that of St. Muredach's death, is uncertain; but his Natalis 
is marked in all the ancient Calendars on the 12th of August. 

The See of Down, in the territory of Dalaradia, was 
founded in the sixth century by St. Fergus. The founder was 
of a princely family, and before his elevation to the episco- 
pacy, erected a Monastery at Killbian, in that county. St. 
Cailan has been named by some as the founder of this See, 
but the Annals of Ulster make mention of Fergus, as the 
first Bishop of Down, and mark his decease at the 30th of 
March, 683. From the death of the founder until the time 
of St. Malachy, there appears no account of a succession in 
this See, for which reason it is generally supposed, that the 
Diocess of Down had, during that period, been united to 
that of Connor .j: 

The ^e of Ross, in the County of Cork, was established 
by St. Fachnan about the year 670. Before he settled at 
Ross, Fachnan was Abbot of Darinis Moelanfaidh, now 

• A. A. S. S. p. 339. t Ware's Anliq. t Ware's Bishops. 



99 

Molona, a small island in the river Blackwater^ County of 
Waterford. His school was greatly frequented, and at that 
time was the most celebrated in the South of Ireland. This 
See has been sometimes called Ross-Alithre, on account of 
the number of pilgrims who retired there for devotion. The 
See of Ross became united to that of Cloyne in the eighteenth 
century, the particulars of which may be found in the history 
of that period. St. Fachnan died at the close of the sixth cen- 
tury, and the day marked as his Natalis is the 14th of August. 

The See of Cloyne, in tlie County of Cork, was founded 
by St. Colman about the year 680. This Prelate was of 
royal extraction, and has been sometimes sumamed Mitine, 
having been a native of thQ district called Muscrighe Mitine, 
now Muskerry in the County of Cork. From his early years 
he evinced great taste for poetry, and was held in high es- 
teem by the prince Aodh Caomh, who in this century was 
raised to the throne of Cashel. Colman, at an early age, 
repaired to the school of larlath of Tuam, and became 
eminent not only for his learning, but much more for his 
holy and austere manner of living. He was the author of 
several valuable treatises, the only one of which that remains 
is a metrical life of St. Senan of Inniscatthy, written in the 
Irish language. St. Colman died on the 24th of November, 
A. D. 604. 

Many other Sees had been founded by eminent men 
in this century, which were afterwards united either to 
some of those already mentioned, or- to others established in 
the seventh century. Among these may be noticed the See 
of Ardstrath, now Ardstraw, in the Barony of Strabane 
and County of Tyrone, founded by St. Eugene.* It was 
afterwards translated to Maghera, and finally united to the 
See of Derry. The See of Clunes or Clones, in the County 
of Monaghan, had St. Tigernach for its first bishop. This 

• Usher. Ind. Chron. 



100 

Saint having succeeded St. Macarthen in Clogher, fixed his 
See at Clones, still retaining the government of Qogher. These 
Sees were, however, afterwards united. Coleraine was a 
bishopric in 640, having St. Corpreus for its first bishop.* 
It was In aftertimes united to Deny. Kells, in the County 
of Meath, the founder of which is unknown, was united to 
Clonard in the 13th century. Dunshaohlin in the same 
county, had St. Sechnal for its founder, and was united to 
Clonard about the year 1152. The See of KiLLABKinthe 
Barony of Achonrath, in the County of Westmeath, had St. 
Aidus for its founder.*)- St. I>agaeu» was bishop at Iniscaoin- 
Deghadh, in the territory of Oriel, county of Louth. St. 
Etehen, by whom St. Columbkill] was ordained, resided in 
the County of Meath; besides Sedna, Dalian, Lugidus, Mocu^ 
Loige, Cronan, and numberless others who w^e stationed 
through the provinces according as local circumstances or the 
exigency of the Mission required. Thus was the Church of 
Ireland organized and governed by great and holy men, while 
the doctrine which they preached, and the discipline which 
they enforced, acquired new efficacy and lustre fix)m the 
many and exalted virtues by which their own lives had been 
adorned. 

In presenting a general outline of the principal Monaff- 
teries founded in this century, we shall commence with the 
ancient and celebrated Abbey of Clokuacxois, the schools 
attached to which have been already noticed. J Clonmacnois 
was one of the most extensive and splendid Monasteries in 
the kingdom, having been amazingly- enriched by the Nobi- 
lity of the country and by several kings and princes. Ten 
stately Churches were annexed to it, erected by varions prin- 
ces, and covering a space of seven acres. The first was 
built by O'Melaghlin, King of Meath; the second by O'Con- 
nor Don, King of Cannaught; the third by M'Carthy-More, 

• Id. t A. A. S. S. p. 422. x See c. 1. 



101 

of Munster; the fourth by O'Kelly; the fifth was called 
Temple Hurpan; the sixth Temple Kieran; the seventh Tem- 
ple Gauney; the eight Temple Doulin; the ninth Temple 
Finian; and the tenth Temple Mac Dermot^ from its foimder 
the great Mac Dermot Prince of Connaught. The Danes 
committed dreadful ravs^es in this splendid Monastery, de- 
stroying the library and plundering the sanctuary of vest- 
mentSy chalices, crosses of gold and silver, jewels and other 
valuable ornaments with which it was enriched. What the 
Danes had left undone the English completed; they came 
from Milick in 1201, and pillaged the church, sanctuary, 
and town of Clonmacnois; neither the monuments of the 
dead or the altars of the Most High could be secured from 
the fury of these usurpers, and to finish the devastation, 
when glutted with sacrilege they robbed and laid waste the 
adjacent domains, together with the crops, gardens, and 
houses of the inhabitants.* In the sixteenth century the 
ancient Monastery of Clonmacnois, like the other religious 
institutions of the country, fell a sacrifice to the rapacity of 
the times; and thus was the door of hospitality closed against 
the poor and the stranger, while sanctity and learning fled, 
leaving nothing behind but mouldering ruins and ivy-clad 
towers, the sad memento of bye-gone days — the melancholy 
record of a profaned sanctuary and of a fallen degraded 
nation. 

The Monastery of Imniscattht, situated in a beautiful 
island of that name, at the mouth of the Shannon and in the 
County of Clare, was erected by St. Senan about the year 
520.t St. Kieran of Clonmacnois spent several years in 
this Monastery as providore for the poor and the stranger* 
In 972, the Danes committed great destruction here; but 
Brian, King of Munster, recovered the island after having 
defeated lomhar the Norman; in which battle his two sons 

• M'Geoghan, t For St SenaD, see c. 111. 



102 

and eight hundred of the Danes were slain.* In the 20th of 
Elizabeth this Abbey with forty-four acres of land, (part of 
its possessions,) and a right of toll on certain iSshing boats 
coming into the port of Limerick, were granted to the 
Mayor ^nd Citizens of Limerick at an annual rent.f The 
monument of St. Senan is still preserved, with the remains 
of eleven small churches and several cells; and in the centre 
of these venerable ruins may be seen one of those round 
towers of other days, one hundred and twenty feet high; 
rising in majestic grandeur over the waters of the Shannon. J 
The ancient library of this Abbey was greatly esteemed for 
the number of its rare and valuable manuscripts — these have 
been all swept away in the wreck. Neither religion, language, 
or nation, has been spared; but the grand and hallowed ruins 
are still to be seen, and in silent eloquence present to the 
mind of the Irishman an impressive but melancholy outline 
of the wrongs^ the woes, and the sufferings of his country. 

* Annal. Monst. t And. Gen. 

X On the subject of these round towers there appears a variety of opinion. It 
is supposed by some that they had been originally intended for belfries ; others con- 
jecture that they had been designed as habitations or retreats for anchorites ; while 
according to a third hypothesis they might have been places of penance, in which 
the penitents after having performed certain stations in the several lofts of the tower, 
at length came forth and were publicly absolved. These opinions, however, do not 
seem to correspond with the peculiai architectural construction of these towers, the 
doors of which are generally ten or twelve feet from the base, while four windows 
are placed at the top, facing exactly the four cardinal points. The general, and most 
probable opinion is, that these round towers had been originally constructed and 
used as temples for fire-worship ; in the lower part of which was the altar with the 
hallowed fire ; while the top, with the windows so peculiarly disposed, served as an 
observatory for celestial or astronomical purposes. It is weU known that in pagan 
times fire-worship had formed a leadiog tenet among the supeistitions of the ancient 
Irish, and it is very remarkable that round towers of a similar construction are to be 
found in Hindostan, and other parts of the £ast, where fire-worship is still preserved 
and generally practised. AAer the introduciton of Christianity into Ireland, 
churches were erected on a site convenient to these towers, in order that the new 
converts might now repair to, and worship the true God, in those very places where 
they had formerly been accustomed to pay divine honour to fire, to the sun, and to 
other created objects. 



103 

The Monaste&t of the Island op All Saints in Lough- 
Rie, County of Longford, was established by St. Kieran 
about the year 544. The temporal as well as the spiritual 
wants of the poor, appear to have been among the first of 
those noble objects contemplated by the founder in the erec- 
tion of this religious asylum. By his extraordinary influence, 
as well as by the united exertions of his community, this 
Monastery became within the lapse of a few years possessed 
of sufficient means to answer all the purposes which had 
been originally contemplated.* It was, therefore, usually 
designated the house of the poor, to whose relief its posses- 
sions were made. applicable; while their spiritual wants were 
at the same time attended to by the benevolent followers of 
its truly apostolic founder. About the year 548, St Kieran 
having resigned the government of this Monastery to his dis- 
ciple St Domnann, repaired towards the south, and laid the 
foundation of .his great establishment at Clonmacnois. The 
Monastery of the Island of All Saints remained in a flourish- 
ing condition for upwards of six hundred years after its 
foundation; but about the period of the English invasion it 
was suffered to decline, and at length became a complete 
ruin. It was, however, rebuilt by one of the Dillon family 
about the reign of Henry III., while its abbots continued in 
regular succession until the sixteenth century. We should 
be guilty of an ungrateful transgression, were we to omit 
noticing the learned professor and writer Aogustin Mac Grai- 
din, who flourished in this ancient retreat of literature about 
the year 1405. That learned man was at this period its abbot, 
and compiled a complete history of the acts of the saints of 
Ireland, together with a comprehensive outline of the Annals 
of this Abbey, down to his own timcf The possessions, of 
which we have no exact account, were granted at the sup- 
pression to Sir Patri^^k Bamwall.j: 

• A. A. S. S. p. 191, t Ware Writers, p. 87. j Harria tab. 



104 

Thb Monastsrt of Dbrrt was founded by St. Columb- 
kill about the year 546. This Abbey became a constant 
scene of plunder during the ravages of the Danes^ and par- 
ticularly under the government of the Abbot Gilla O'Brenain, 
and of his successor Gill Christ O^Keamich, when the noted 
Rotsel Pitun was defeated by the O 'Neils, and his troops 
routed with dreadful slaughter. By a decree passed at the 
Council of Brigh-Mac-thighe, in the County of Meath, in 
1158, the Abbot of Derry had supreme jurisdiction over all 
the Abbies of the Columbian Order in the kingdom,* and 
its superiors continued in regular succession until the sixteenth 
century, when its possessions, of which we have no exact 
account, became involved in the general confiscation. 

The Monastery of Clonenaoh, in the Barony of Marl- 
borough, Queen's County, was founded by St. Fintan about 
the year 548.t This Saint, anxious to establish a religious 
house and place it under that austere discipline for which he 
had been remarkable, fixed on a place called Cluain-Ednech, 
(now Clonenagh,) or Latibulum Haderosum, the retired spot 
covered with ivy. The school attached to this sequestered 
Monastery was so celebrated that it ranked after the four dis- 
tinguished seminaries already noticed. Among the eminent 
men who received their education in it was Comgall of Ban- 
gor, j: It was called the Gallican School, from the great num- 
ber of foreigners who resorted there, and particularly from 
Graul. The hospitality of this house was proverbial, while 
the Monks by their rule were obliged to observe the most 
rigorous austerity. This religious retreat suffered severely 
durbg the Danish Wars, and about the year 1070 became a 
complete ruin. 

The Abbey of Kells in the County of Meath, was 
founded by St. Columbkill about 650, and was dedicated to 
the Blessed Virgin.§ This Abbey is remarkable for many 

• Tr. Th, p. 205. f For St. Fintan, see c. III. 

t Life of Finlan, c. V. § Tr. Th. p. 608. 



105 

memorable events. In 967 a furious attack had been made 
on it by Sitric, the Dane, when he was routed with great 
slaughter by O'Neil the Great, King of Ireland. In 1152, 
the famous synod was held in the Abbey of Kells, at which 
Cardinal Paparo, the Pope's Legate presided, and in which 
he distributed palliums to the four Archbishops.* The Abbey 
of Kells was six times destroyed by fire, but was afterwards 
rebuilt in a style of greater magnificence, partly by the bounty 
of the princes of Ireland, but much more out of the immense 
revenues attached to it. It had the most splendid library of 
any monastery in the kingdom, having been celebrated for 
its manuscripts, among which was St. Columbkiirs book of 
the Four Gospels, adorned with gold and precious stones. — 
Richard Plunket was the last Abbot in 1537, when Henry 
VIII. held three inquisitions and took into his own hands the 
extensive possessions belonging to this Abbey, an account of 
which shall be given in the history of the sixteenth century. 
The Monastery op Durrow, in the Barony of Bally- 
cowen. King's County, was one of the favourite retreats of 
St. Columba, by whom it was founded A.D. 550. This re- 
ligious asylum has contributed a large supply of learned and 
holy men to our calendar, and during the seventh and eight 
centuries became exceedingly celebrated for literature. Cum- 
mian, distinguished ahke for his extensive knowledge and for 
his advocacy of the Roman paschal computation, may be 
ranked among the number of its scholars; while Kineth, Ai- 
dan, Blathmac and others, are noticed by our annalists 
among its learned professors and abbots.f The English soon 
after their arrival in Ireland, committed great destruction in 
this ancient establishment, having in 1175 stormed the town, 
gutted the Monastery, and reduced the surrounding country 
to the condition of a desert. By an indispensable ordinance 
of the Columbian Institute, its members were obliged to de- 

• Sw 12th Century. t Tr. Th. p. 507. 



106 

rote a conBiderable portion of each day to the useful employ- 
ment of transcribing, on which account it is said that the 
library of Durrow was the most select, and perhaps the most 
Taluable in the kingdom. Among other curious wprks, there 
had been preserved in it a splendid copy of the four Evange- 
lists, transcribed by St. Columba, and adorned with engrav- 
ings on plates of silver.* In the sixteenth century it became 
a wreck, and during the 4th of Elizabeth, a lease of the 
Abbey and of its possessions (which cannot be ascertained,) 
was granted at an annual rent to Nicholas Herbert-f 

The Monastery of Biri^, in the Barony of Fercall, 
King's County, had St. Brendan for its founder, about the 
year 550.]: During the administration of the Abbot St. Kil-- 
lian, in the seventh century, the reputati<)K of the school of 
Birr had been so high, and the influx of foreigners so great, 
that numbers of the native students generously yielded to the 
strangers, and proceeded to finish their education in other 
seminaries.^ So unbounded was the hospitality of this 
Abbey, that 'the m^ks* themselves were not unfrequently 
sent out by St. KIqpl through the surrounding country, to 
discover if there was any person in distress. The last supe- 
rior whom we have on record was Sioda Mac Namara; his 
death is marked at 1311, after which time this ancient re- 
treat was suffered to fall into decay, nor does it appear that 
any effort had been made for its restoration. 

The Monastery of Moville, (or Maghbile, the Plain of 
Trees,) in the Barony of the Ardes, and County of Down, 
was founded most probably by St. Finnian, about the middle 
of the sixth century. Several saints and patrons of literature 
have flourished in this ancient retreat, among whom are 
noticed St. Senell, St. Liberius, and the pious and learned 
Abbot Flathbertach, who died on a pilgrimage in 1098. The 
Abbey of Moville continued to flourish until the year 1542: 

* Ware Mod. t Aud. Geo. t For St. Brendan see c. III. § Usher p. 494. 



107 

James M^Guilmore was. the last abbot^ when this venerable 
foundation, after having for a series of centuries braved the 
storms of the Danes and the repeated attacks of both Scot- 
tish and Irish depradators, became a prey to the plunderers 
of the sixteenth centuryf and among its extensive posses- 
sions the following parcels were confiscated to the crown: — 
Seven townlands, among which were Drom Kerry and Bally- 
hu^an, in Upper Clandeboy; a townland and a half in the 
Little Ardes; four townlands of Luggan Droma; three town- 
lands in the Ardes; and eight towulands in the country of 
South O'Neil, together with the tithes of the whole lands of 
the priory of Newton.* 

The Monastery of AoHABOE^f in the Barony o^f Upper 
Ossory, Queen's County^ derives its foundation from St Ca- 
nice, or Kenny, about the year 577.:}; In the eleventh cen- 
tury the Cathedral See of Ossory was removed from Saigar to 
Aghaboe, when the shrine of the patron saint, Canice, was 
deposited therein. This establishment was rebuilt in 1250 by 
Fitzpatrick, ancestor of the Lords of Upper Ossory, under 
the invocation of St. Canice, and granted to the Dominicans. 
The town of Aghaboe was burned to the ground by M'Gille- 
patrick in 1346, and the shrine and reliques of St. Canice 
were lost in the conflagration. This retreat of learning and 
sanctity continued to flourish until the time of Elizabeth^ 
when its possessions, which were then indeed very limited^ 
were granted together with the advowson of the rectory of 
St. Canice of Aghaboe, at an annual rent of £5 ISs., to 
Florence Fitzpatrick.§ 

The Abbey of 6l£ndalooh,|1 "once the luminary of the 
western world," says an eminent writer, "whence savage septs 
and roving barbarians derived the benefit of knowledge and the 

* King, p. 345. f Anciently called Achadhbbo, or the Field of the Ox. 

t For St. Canice see c. III. 
i Aud. Gen. || Tht Abbey of the Glio, or Valley of the Two Loaghr, 



108 

blessings of religion." The Abbey Glendaloch in the Barony of 
Ballynacor, County of Wicklow, was founded by St. Coem- 
gen, or Kevin^ about the year 549.* The site on which the 
^ Abbey stands is bold and romantic: here the mountains cast 
a melancholy gloom on the valley beneath, and so awful and 
venerable is the scene> that even to a mementary beholder, it 
appears as if formed by nature for the study and contempla- 
tion of the eremetic life. The Abbey was founded under the 
invocation of St. Peter and St. Paul, and in process of time, 
owing to the vast number of students and religious persons 
who resorted here, Glendaloch became a populous and a 
noted city. It was the see of a bishop in the seventh century, 
while the succession of its abbots went on in uninterrupted 
Older; and the schools of Glendaloch were frequented and 
crowded with students even in those frightful times, when the 
plains of this country were deluged with the blood of Danes 
and Irishmen. In 1162, St. Lawrence O'Toole, who was 
descended from the princely patrons of this Abbey, was 
unanimously elected its superior, and was shortly afterwards 
advanced to the archiepiscopal throne of Dublin. Its repu- 
tation at length excited the jealousy of those who ought in 
gratitude to have been its benefactors. In 1398, the poster- 
ity of the original English adventurers, viewing the glaring 
contrast between the flourishing schools of Glendaloch and 
the petty, limited, mercenary seminaries in their own country, 
came with fire and sword and burned and destroyed the city.f 
The Abbey was, however, preserved, and continued to be 
governed by its proper superiors until the sixteenth century, 
when the universal wreck took place; and what the English 
in 1398 forgot or scrupled to have done, was well remembered 
and without scruple regularly executed by Henry VIII. and 
his inimitable successors. The venerable ruins of Glendaloch^ 
even at this day, present an awful and an interesting picture 

* For St. Kevin see c. III. t Annal Four Masteis* 



109 

to the mind of the curious and contemplative stranger. Among 
these must be noticed the Church of the Trinity, standing on, 
a rising ground north of the Abbey. The Seven Churches, , 
which in former days were the pride and glory of Glendaloch, 
and for which it will be celebrated, even when the vestiges 
now remaining are no more. The Cathedral Church, with its 
curious doors, jambs and lintels, and its round tower one 
hundred and ten feeet high, rising up in its ancient grandeur 
amidst the prostrate ruins which surround it. Our Lady's 
Church, the most westward of the Seven, and nearly op- 
posite the Cathedral, is in ruins; but these very ruins speak 
volumes, and the scattered monuments, crosses, and inscrip- 
tions refresh the memory, and fill the mind with new and 
painful thoughts. St. Kevin's Kitchen, so called, and un- 
doubtedly one of the Seven Churches, is entire; together 
with its architraves, fretted arches, and round belfry forty- 
five feet high. The finger of time alone and of human 
neglect seem to have wrought the work of desolation in this 
part of the builduig. The Rhefeart, or the Sepulchre of 
Kings, is rendered famous for having seven kings interred 
within its walls.* The Ivy Church stands to the westward, 
with its unroofed walls overgrown with ivy. The Priory of 
St. Saviour is a complete ruin. Teampull-na-Skellig in the 
recess of the mountain, was formerly called the Temple of 
the Desert, and whither the austere fathers of the Abbey 
were wont to retire on vigils, and days of particular 
mortification. The celebrated bed of St. Kevin on the 
south side of the Lough, and hanging perpendicularly at a 
frightful height over jthe surface of the waters, is another 
object in which the mind of the antiquary would be much 

* The tomb of M'Thuill, or O'Toole, ihe ancient Chieftan of this territory, is 
plaoed in thtB Church with the foUowing inscription : 

J18U8 Christ. 

Mile DEACH FEUCH CORPRE MAC MTHUIL. 

Se^ here the resting-place of the body of King M'Thuill, who died is Christ 101 0« 



110 

gratified; and on the same side of the mountain are to be 
seen the remains of a small stone building, called St. Kevin's 
ceil. These hallowed ruins stand in the heart of a pictur- 
esque and beautiful^ country — the romantic mountains by 
which they are encompassed — ^the long-extended valley 
beneath, with its intermixture of rivulets, flowers, and ruins, 
and the solemn and dead silence of nature throughout the 
scene, must render Glendaloch a book of meditation for the 
stranger — of instruction for the Irishman — and of dread and 
terror for the despoiler and the plunderer. 

These few Monasteries selected from the long catalogue 
which our Monasticons present, may enable us to form some 
idea of the literary and religious spirit of our forefathers. — 
The limits of this analysis will allow us to give merely a list 
of the remainder, together with the names of their respective 
founders. 

The Monastery of Clones in the County of Monagban, 
had St. Tigernach for its founder: Thomas Biudhe was the 
last abbot, when its possessions were granted by Elizabeth to 
Sir Henry Duke,* and afterwards became the property of 
Lord Thomas Dacre. — Muckamore, County of Antrim, 
founded by St. Colman Elo, the possessions were granted to 
Sir R. Langford.f — Roscommon founded by St. Coeman, the 
possessions were granted to Sir Nicholas Malbye.J — Anna- 
trim in the Queen's County, founded by St. Coeman. — Inch- 
MACNBRiN, an island in Lough- Kee, County of Roscommon, 
founded by St. Columba; the property was given by Eliza^ 
beth to William Taaffe.§— Kilmorb in the County of Ar- 
magh, founded by St. Moctoe. — Rosture, near Slieu-Bloom, 
Queen's County, founded by St. Brendan.||— Rosscairbrk in 
the County of Cork, founded by St. Fachnan.— Edardruin 
in the County of Roscommon, founded by St. Diradius. — 
Camross in the County of Wexford, founded by St. Abban. — 

• Davis' Collect, t Harris' tab. X Aud.-Gen. $ Id. || ArchdalL Mooast. 



Ill 

FiONMAGH, (Lady's Island,) in Fothart, County of Wexford, 
founded by St. Abban. — Cluain-Finglass in the County of 
Cork, founded by St. Sedna. — Kill-na-Marbham, or the 
Church of the Dead, in the County of Cork, 'founded by St. 
Abban. — Inis-Kealtre in Lough-Dergh, founded by St. 
Camin. — ^Tirdaglass in . the • the County of Tipperary, 
founded by St. Columba. — Clonpbjit-Molua in the King's 
County, founded be St. Molua. — Devenish, in Lough-Erne, 
County of Fermanagh, founded by St. Molaisse. — Killa- 
BAiN in the County of Meath, founded by St. Abban. — ^Au- 
GiKA, in Lough-Ree, County of Longford, founded by St. 
Kieran. — Clinish, an island in Lough-Erne, founded by St. 
Senell. — Cluain-Conbriun, in the Golden Vale, County of 
Tipperary, founded by St. Abban. — ^Ardfinnan in the 
County of Tipperary, founded by St. Finian. — Killmoydoo 
in the County of. Longford, founded by St. Modan. — Kille- 
rea in the County of Cork, founded by St. Chera. — Cluain- 
DAiMH in the County of Down, founded by St. Mochommoc. 
Enach-Duan in the County of Galway, founded by St. Bren- 
dan. — KiLLARAGHT in the County of Sligo, founded by St. 
Coeman. — Killchairpre in the County of Sligo, founded by 
St. Carpreus. — SEANBHOTnin the County of Wexford, founded 
by St. Colman. — Lorrah in the County of Tipperary, founded 
by St. Ruadan. — Clonpert-Kerpan in the County of Kil- 
kenny, founded by St. Abban. — Fiddown in the County of 
Kilkenny, founded by St. Maidoc. — Ireland's-eye, a small 
island lying to the north of the Hill of Howth. An abbey 
was founded here by St. Nessan, and in it was preserved the 
book of the Four Gospels, commonly called the Garland of 
Howth. 



CHAPTER III. 

Religious and Literary Characters of the Sixth Century — 
General Observations. 

In addition to the eminent men whose biography may be 
found in the foregoing chapters^ there yet remain an host of 
others, whose learning, virtues, and literary labours have 
contributed in this century to shed lustre on the Church of 
Ireland. 

St. Sbnan, a native of Corco-Daskind, in Thomond, and 
of royal descent, has been ranked among the Fathers of the 
Irish Church in the sixth century. His birth was foretold by 
St. Patrick, when our Apostle had been preaching to the in- 
habitants or that territory A.D. 448. Senan, when a young 
man, retired from the world and received the religious habit 
from the hands of the holy Abbot* Cassidus. Some time 
after he repaired to the school of Natalis,"*^ where he soon 
distinguished himself; and his superior talents and sanctity 
became the subject of universal admiration. About the year 
520, and at the age of fifty, he founded the great Monastery 
of Inniscatthy.f Here Senan gave constant and public lec- 
tures on the Scriptures, fathers, and doctrines of the Church; 
while the number of learned priests and bishops whom this 
establishment sent forth have justly elicited the eulogy of our 

* In the metrical life of St. Senan, by St. Colman, of Cloyne, we read : " In 
visione igitur — hoc Abbati praeciptur — Abbati, inquam, Cassido — hoc jubetur a 
Domino — ut Senanum novitium — et Abbatem eximium — mittat Natalum nomine*- 
nt subejus regimine — disciplinis et artibus — instrueretur plenius — fuit enim tunc 
temporia — fama Natali Celebris — cum ingens congregatio— in ejus contubernio— 
quinquaginta videlicet — et centum fratrum degeret." 

t See c. II. 



113 

ancient writers. His death occurred ou the 8th of March, 
A.D. 546^ and so g^reat was the reverence in which he had 
been held; that the prelates, clei^, and principal persons of 
the country aksembled in his Church, and his obsequies were 
celebrated for- eight days. The fame of St. Senan has not 
been confined to Ireland; it was spread over the Continent, 
and his acts have been published among those of the saints 
•f Britapny, and other countries.* 

^ St CoLUMBA, Son of Cbimthan, was of the royal race of 
Hy Kinsella, in Leinster, and a disciple of St. Finian of 
Clonard.f Having completed his studies, he selected three 
diseiples, Fintan, ^ooumen, and Coeman. Viewing Clone- 
pagh from an adjacent mountain, and interested for the hap- 
piness of its people, he recpmmended Fintan to settle there. 
He himself shortly after laid the foundation of the great 
Monastery and Seminary of Tirdaglass, in the Barony of 
Lower Ormond, County of Tipperary, about the year 648. — 
6t Columba is said to have written several tracts abounding 
with much biblical research and illustration. He had a 
peculiar taste for the sciences, the leading demonstrations of 
which he was wont to convert to the most noble and sublime 
purposes, and frequently rendered them elucidatory of many 
of the fundamental and mysterious dogmas of the Christian 
Religion. St. Columba died oathe 13th of December, A.D. 
652. 

St. MotAissB of Dbvbkish, sometimes called Lasirean, 
was a native of Carbury, County of Sligo. Having departed 
from the school of Qlonard, to which he had for several years 
been attached, he retired to the island of Devenish, in Lough 
Erne, about the year 660.J: Here he erected a splendid 
abbey, which for lessons in morality and science, ranked 
next to Bangor, in the north. While the rule which St. Mo- 
laisse had drawn up for the government of his community, 

* Lobiocan Hitt. de Brettognt , t Tr. Th. p. 457. t Vit. 8. Maid. 

P 



114 

evinced bis practical knowledge of the human heart and of 
the Gospel counsels; his public discourses on both philosophi- 
cal and sacred subjects formed the theme of uniyersal admi- 
ration, and attracted multitudes of strangers to the romantic 
and literary shores of Lough Erne. We who live in those 
days of oppression on the one hand, and of beggary on the 
other, can form a very faint idea indeed of the happiness 
which at this period reigned along the winding and pictures- 
que shores of this lovely lake. The very strangers who came 
here for education, were unwilling to remove from it; while 
those who did return to their native country were enabled to 
become the teachers of their own people; and both in their 
discourses and writings never failed to eulogize the sanctity, 
the learning, and disinterested hospitality of Ireland. The 
name of Molaisse of Devenish, has been noticed with great 
respect by foreign writers, while the scenes of his labours, 
now in ruins and washed by the waters of Lough Erne, furnish 
the mind with an abundance of serious and awful lessons for 
meditation. St. Molaisse died on the 12th of September, 
A.D. 670. 

St. Bbbndan of Birr, was of a noble family, having been 
descended from Corb, Prince of the Decies, in M unster.* 
Among the disciples of Finian of Ctonard, Brendan holds a 
distinguished rank ; and in the Acts of that Saint he is charac* 
terized as a. "Prophet and one of the leading men in the 
schools of Ireland." This Saint was a great favourite with 
Brendan of Clonfert, with the two Kierans, and particularly 
with Columbkill, on whose virtues he composed several poems, 
both in Irish and Latin.f About the year 550 he founded 
the Abbey of Birr, in the present Barony of Fercall, King's 
County. Brendan is represented by the Irish Annalists as a 
man of great natural endowments; but sacred poetry was 
that in which he principally excelled. Being a profound 

• Tr. Th. p. 544. t Ware Writers. 



115 

theologian, and haying made the writings of the Psalmist 
and of the Prophets his constant study, he is said to have 
written a variety of sacred pieces, which were at that time 
used in the churches of Ireland, and were held in extraordi- 
nary veneration. Colgan intended to have published his Acts, 
but this desideratum has not, it seems, appeared. St. Bren- 
dan died on the 29th of November, A.D. 571, and is justly 
numbered among the Fathers of the Church of Ireland.* 

St FiNNiAN of Maohbile, or Moville, in the County of 
Down, was descended from a branch of the princely bouse of 
Dalfiatach. When very young be was placed under the care 
of Colman of Dromore, and from thence he repaired to the 
great school of Nennius in Britain, and finally to Rome, 
where he was raised to the priesthood. About the year 530, 
he founded the great Monastery of Moville, in the seminary 
attached to which St. Columbkill received his education. St. 
Finnian was raised to the episcopal digninty,f and in the 
Acts of Comgall of Bangor, he is thus spoken of: '^Vir ve- 
nerabilis Finnianus Episcopus, qui jacet in multis miraculis 
in sua civitate Maghbile." St. Finnian died in the year 576, 
and his memory was held in great veneration through the 
whole territory of Ulidia. The learning of this Saint together 
with his great virtues, entitled him to be ranked with St 
Finnian of Clonard. He is said to have been the author of 
several works on sacred and scientific subjects, all of which 
are now lost in the waves of time, and most likely amid the 
storms which blew over the Church of Ireland during the 
sixteenth and succeeding centuries. 

St FiNTAN of Clonenaoh was a native of Leinster, hav- 
ing been bom near Ross, in the County of Wexford, about 
the year 520.^ Fintan studied under St. Columba, the son 
of Crimthan, aud by his advice formed the great establish- 
ment of Clonenagh about the year 548.§ The discipline of 

* Usher't Ind. Chron. t A. A. S. S. p. 643. t Colgan life, &e. $ S«e c. II. 



116 

St. Fintan's rule wag the most rigoroat of any m Ireland; 
sereral holy men who bad for years been inured to great 
mortification^ having entered Clonenagh, were unable to com- 
ply with the observance of its rules. On some occasions the 
Saint allowed them a trifling relaxation, while he himself ob- 
served to the letter the austerities of the Institute. Clones 
liagh was rathet a nursery of saints than of learned men: it 
was less distinguished for human literature than ma^y others; 
but as a retreat of penance— as a school of sanctity and of 
religious knowledge, it stood in those days unrivalled. While 
theological instructions were delivered thecM^tically in its 
balls, the most sublime counsels of the Gospel, and the moet 
interesting truths of divinity were observed in the cloister, 
and practically exemplified by its holy and mortified inmates, 
fit. Fintan died on the 17th February, A.D. 597. 

St. Cakicb, or Kbknt, (Cainech,) from whom the City of 
Kilkenny derives its name,* was bom in the territory of Kien- 
natta,t in Ulster, A.D. 516. His father was Laidec, a cele^ 
brated poet, and the name of his mother was Melda. Canice 
at an early age repaired to Britain, and placed himself under 
the care of the venerable Abbot Cadoc; he afterwards at^ 
tended for several years at the school of St. Finnian of CIo^ 
nard, and being duly qualified for the mission, Canice went 
forth and preached the Gospel in various districts of the 
North of Ireland. This Saint next proceeded to the south, 
and having entered the territory now called Upper Ossory, 
and meeting with great encouragement, he founded the cele^ 
brated Monastery of Aghaboe, about the year 577. j: 

The seminary attached to Aghaboe was famous for lectures 
on the Scriptures and sacred poetry. St. Canice has written 
a copy of the four Gospels with a valuable commentary^ 

* A church had been dedicated there to St. Cainech, or Kenny. 

t The present Barony of Kenaght, in the County of Derry, forms a portion of 
this territoty, 

$ See c. II. 



117 

whi<ih was pi'eaerV&d for a long time^ and called GlaB»-Cain»- 
e€li> or the Chain of Canice.* He was endowed With supers- 
natural girts, and greatly esteemed as a biographer and a 
poet. St. Canice has written, likewise, a life of St Columb«- 
kill, and a collection of hymns, which in those days were et.* 
ceedingly admired and gaiemlly used in the churches of Ire* 
land. The Saint died on the 1 1th of October, A.D. 599, and 
in the 83rd year of his age. 

St. MOLtJA of Clokv&et^Molua, was descended of a 
noble family in the territory of Hy-Figinti, in Munster* Glo> 
nard aiid Bangor were the establishments in which he had 
been educated. By the adtice of St. Gomgall> Molua re- 
turned with a lew disciples to Munster, and formed a religious 
settlement near Mount Luachra in the County of Limerick.-^ 
From thence he directed his course towards Slteve-Bloom and 
erected the celebrated Monastery of Clonfert^Molua, in the 
King's County. St. Molua drew up a particular rule for his 
monks, which was highly aj^roved of by St. Gregory the 
Great, and he is said to have laid the fbundatioa of one 
hundred religious houses.f Clonfert-Molua was not only the 
seat of learning, but likewise an house of rigid discipline and 
superior sanctity. The founder is ranked among the Fathers 
of the Irish Church, and his death occurred on the 4th of 
August, A.D. 608. 

St. CoEMiSEN or Kevin o( Gl£nsaloch was of a dis- 
tinguished family in the temtory of Thrtuathal, the country 
of tlie OTooles in the County of Wicklow. In his seventh 
year he was committed to the care of the venerable Petrocusf, 
and afterwards spent several years under the direction of the 
holy Anchorites Eogan, Lechan, and Enna. About the year 
549, he founded the Celebrated Abbey of Glendaloch, at 
which period also he attended the Assembly at Usneach, 
together with Sts. Columba, Comgttll and Canice. Shortly 
after the foundation of Glendaloch, St. Kevin retired into a 

* Usher p. 1065, t S^* Bernard's life of Molu. 



118 

^ild and lonely part of the mountains of Wicklow, where, 
separated from man, and conversing with God alone, he spent 
four years in prayer and the contemplation of the holy Scrip- 
tures.* Here he practised the greatest austerities, but was 
at length prevailed on by his monks to return to Glendaloch 
and superintend its discipline. Some writers mention him as 
Bishop of that place; this, however, is uncertain, and amounts 
to a mere opinion. St. Libba, his nephew, who flourished in 
the seventh century, was certainly Bishop of Glendaloch, 
and most probably the first Prelate in that See. St Kevin 
preached for several years and instructed multitudes, not 
only through the medium of human knowledge, but much 
more by the wonderful and superior sanctity of his life. — 
This Saint died on the 3rd of June, A.D. 618. 

To present a regular biography of all the eminent men 
whose virtues and learning shed lustre on the Irish Church of 
the sixth century, would be a task which the limits of this 
analysis will not allow us to encounter. The other leading 
characters among them were St. Nessan, Abbot an4 founder 
of Mungret, near Limerick — St. Ruadan, Abbot of Lorrah, 
County of Tipperary — St. lUand, descended from Leogaire, 
and Superior of Rathlibhten in the King's County — St. Der- 
mit, of the princely house of Hy-fiachre, and Abbot of Inis- 
clothran in the County of Longford — St. Aidus, descended 
from Nial of the Nine Hostages — St. Rioch, of Inisbofinde 
in Lough Rie — St. Carthagh, Bishop in Kerry — St. Molua- 
Lobhur, from whom the See of Killaloe has been named — St. 
Cormac, sumamed Nepos Liathani, and disciple of St. Colum- 
ba — St. Coeman, Abbot of Airdne-cemhain, near Wexford — 
St. Endeus, Abbot of Emlaghfad in the County of Sligo — 
St. Conan, of the Tyrconnel line of the Nialls and Abbot of 
Cnodain, County of Donegal — St. Sinell, disciple of St. Fin- 
nian of Clonard, and Abbot of Cluain-inis in Lough Emef — 
St. Evin, founder of the Monastery of Ros-mic-treoin, now 

• Hams Writers. t Tr. Tb. p. 460. A, A. S. S. 463, 



119 

Old Ross, in the County of Wexford; with a countless cata- 
logue of others; all men of superior talent,, learning, and 
sanctity. This chapter shall close with a brief account of 
the holy virgin It a, to which shall be subjoined some appro* 
priate observations. 

St. It A, whom our annalists style the Brigid of Munster, was 
descended from a branch of the princely house of the Desii, 
in the County of Waterford, and was bom about the year 
480. Having arrived at a proper age she signified her in- 
tention of consecrating herself to God, but her parents being 
of a worldly disposition were averse to her wishes, and re- 
fused to grant their assent. Their reluctance, however, hav- 
ing been removed, I ta. proceeded to the Church of St. Dec- 
Ian, from whom she received the white veil, and was enrolled 
in the list of consecrated virgins."* Some time after she re^ 
paired to the territory of Hy-Conaill, in the County of Lim- 
erick, and at the foot of the mountain Luachra, in a retired 
spot called Cluain-Credhuil, she fixed her residence; and was 
soon joined by numbers of pious maidens who came from all 
parts of Ireland to place themselves under her direction. — 
The aust^ty which this holy virgin had practised was ex- 
traordinaiy: she performed many miracles and was favoured 
with the gift of prophecy. Several holy abbots and high 
dignitaries of the Church deemed it an honour to visit St. 
Ita; and the learned Brendan, with many others, frequently 
consulted her on spiritual subjects and were guided by the 
wisdom which her answers conveyed.f Having reached a 
great age, and calling her community around her, she sig- 
nified to them that her hour was approaching, and soon «fter 
departed to her Lord and Spouse on the 15th of January, 
A.D. 570. j: St. Ita is considered the patron Saint of Hy- 
Conaill, together with St. Senan of Inniscatthy. Alcuin in 
one of his poems places her after St Brigid, and Colgan in 
the appendix to her life has collected various eulogiums to 

•Vit.c. V. tId.c.VII. $A.A.S.S.p.72. 



120 

the same purpose. The effects of St*. Ita'a labours contmued 
for ages after, and contributed in no small degree to exalt the 
rising edifice of the Church of Ireland. 

Among the many virtues which had shed siich a lustre on 
the character of the Irish Saints of the sixth century, their 
truly apostolical zeal is not the least conspicuous, and may 
justly challenge our admiration. No sooner had these men 
been enlightened by the Grospel than they seemed, like the 
fathers of the apostolic age, filled with an ardent desire of 
communicating its blessings to the rest of mankind; for this 
purpose many of them retired fh>m the land of their birth, 
and while in the progress of their mission they had brought 
multitudes into the fold of Christ, they at the same time pro- 
cured for their country a reputation which induced foreigners 
to visit its shores and become afterwards its warmest panegy- 
rists. On the other hand, the sanctity of the ecclesiastics, 
to whose care the government of the Church of Iceland had 
been entrusted, contributed in the mean time to complete 
this national character; the virtues which they inculcated they 
strictly practised, while their good example necessarily pro* 
duced its proper effects; the country became a land of saints, 
and the distant stranger returned home filled with admiration 
at the many and exalted instances of Christian heroism by 
which he had been edified. From the historical facts of the 
sixth century we are thus enabled to form some estimate of 
the high position which our nationid Church had attained at 
this early period; while from the events which occurred, and 
the characters who flourished during some of the succeeding 
ages, it will be seen that its uame had become even still more 
celebrated. 

This portion of our history may likewise be eniployed in 
illustrating a truth which has been already advanced in the 
foregoing pages, namely, that public gratuituous education, 
aided by a priesthood perfectly disengaged from the plear 
sures, wealth, and pomp of this world, is, under Providence, 



121 

the great ordinary instrument by which the moral regent 
ration of a people can be effected. The rule by which such 
a priesthood is regulated takes its source from the Gospel it- 
self; it was observed by all the ancient fathet^ of the Church, 
and without it the Cross of Christ would most probably have 
never made such a rapid and triumphant progress. Under 
such a priesthood in the sixth century, Ireland was a land of 
religion: these men sojourned on the earth but their thoughts 
were in heaven, strangers to luxury, unacquainted with the 
pomp and riotting of the palace, they never thought to main- 
tain that wealth and grandeur were essential to their station. 
Many of them had been of noble extraction, and before their 
entrance into the sanctuary had great worldly prospects 
placed before them. Yet all these prospects were sacrificed, 
and the humble counsels of the Gospel were preferably em- 
braced and rigorously practised. Hence it was that their re- 
ligious retreats became schools of science and of morality; 
while the monastery was a home for the way-iSsu'ing man, and 
it was an asylum of comfort for the afflicted and the destitute 
of the surrounding country. Happy Ireland in the olden 
cathcrfic times of our forefathers ! nor shall the picture be at 
present reversed or the melancholy counter-part exhibited.— 
It is hoped, however, that brighter days are beginning to 
open upon us; the darkened cloud cannot always rest on the 
splendid surface of the light of heaven: and although an 
epoch like that of the sixth century may, in all probability, 
never again revolve, yet one thing is certain, the fiiith of that 
celebrated age and the Church which is its guardian, are 
moving along with a rapid and an irresistable velocity ; and 
neither the disguised malice of man nor the open undisguised 
efforts of human power have been able to put a sufficient 
obex to its progress, or divert it, even for an instant, from 
the regular and straight-lined direction in which it has for 
eighteen hundred years steadily and triumphantly proceeded 
in its course. 



SEVENTH CENTURY. 

CHAPTER L 

State of the Church of Ireland at the commencement of the 
seventh century — Its Literature-r-^Sehools of Cork — Of 
old Leiffhlin — Of Taghmon and of Lismore — History of 
the Paschal controversy in Ireland — Its adjustment in the 
Southern diocesses — The andent Cyde supported by the 
Columbian Order — Mission and See- of Lindiefame estab* 
lished by Irishmen — Sts. Aidan^ Finan and Cormae — 
Effects produced by Irish literary ecclesiastical establish^ 
ments both at home and in foreign nations — History of 
SL Oallusy of St. Fursey and of St. KiKan—Acts of 
the National Synod under the Primate Flan Febhla. 

The Church of Ireland at the close of the sixth c^itury 
was unquestionably one of the first national churches in the 
Christian world. Its progress during the seventh century was 
still more rapid and successful. New and extensive seats of 
literature were founded — several ecclesiastical sees were 
established — retreats of piety and hospitality were to be 
seen swelling the long list of antecedent institutions, 
while the number of our exalted ecclesiastics became so 
great, that multitudes, not finding sufficient scqse for their 
exertions at home and fired with burning zeal, repaired to the 
plainslind mountains, to the cities and deserts of the Conti<* 
nent, where by labours unparalleled and perseverance almost 
incredible, they ultimately succeeded in establishing the 
kingdom of Christ, and are to this day looked up to as the 
Apostles and patrons of these remote and long since illustri*- 
ous districts. The ecclesiastical affairs of this century pre- 



128 

flentingy in the general outline,. a similar character with that 
of the preceding one, the same order shall be observed in our 
narrative of the leading facts; and therefore the principal 
schools or colleges which had been founded at this period 
must in the firs£ place be briefly yet distinctly noticed. 
Among these literary establishments four shall be selected, 
namely, that of Cork under St. Finbarr — of Old Lbioblik 
under SL Laserian— of Taghmon under St. Fintan Munnu, and 
of LiBMOBE which was founded by the learned St. Carthagh. 

The most ancient literary establishment of the seventh 
century is that of Cork, founded by St. Barr or Fmbariv 
about the year 606. FinbaiT was a native of Connaught, of 
the sept of Hy-Bruin-ratha, a district lying to the north-eaat 
of the present town of Gralway and in the barony of Athenry.* 
His family name was Lochan, so that Finbarr (white haired) 
was merely his surname. This eminent man had been edu* 
vated under the learned Mac-Corb, a disciple of Gregory the 
Great.t After having travelled through Britain, Gaul, 
Italy and several countries in quest of knowledge, Finban* 
returned to Ireland and erected bis Monastery and School 
near Loch-eire, at the south side of the river Lee, and on a 
site granted him by a Chieftain named Edo.:{: 

The high name which St. Finbarr had held for sanctity and 
knowledge soon spread through Ireland and made its way to 
distant parts of the Continent. Multitudes of scholars both 
natives and foreigners repaired to Cork, and in a few years 
this establishment contained within its walls several hundred 
monks, many of whom bad been afterwards professors in 
various schools, both in this Nation and in foreign countries*! 
St. Finbarr had several eminent disciples, among whom arc 
reckoned the celebrated Garvan, from whom the present 
town of Dungarvan is named; and the learned Nessan, 

• Harris Antiq, c. 7. — Ogygia t Vit. Finbarri, c. 16. 

i Hanmer Chron. i Vit. Finb, 



124 

whose character as a professor of sacred literature had after^ 
wards brought still greater numbers of studenta from aH 
parts to the schools of Cork. The NessAn of whom 
mention has been now made, and upon wbom^ next to 
Finbarr, the reputation of the seminary of Cork depended^ 
is by no means to be confounded with Nessan of Mungret, a 
mistake into which Smith in his history of Cork, has most 
isnaccountably (alien. This would end in an utter confustOA 
both of facts and of Chronology f the latter having died in 652y 
and the former in the seventh century. The same writer was 
equally incorrect in ascribing the foundation of Cork to the 
Danes. Cork had been a populous city long before these 
?Iorthems had ever set foot on Irish ground. The feet is, the 
schools of Finbarr and of his disciple Nessan having been so 
distinguished and vast multitudes of scholars pouring in from 
all parts of Ireland and from distant regions of the Continent 
to this seat of morality and learning, Cork in a very few 
years became an extensive city; nor wiU it be denied that it 
might have been in after times enlarged and considerably imr 
proved by these barbarous yet enterprizing invaders. Philr 
^sophy and the study of the sacred Scriptures were strictly 
attended to in its Schools. While the truths of heavenly 
wisdom had been inculcated, the most sublime virtues were 
practised and the sanctity of its members became so greait 
that their names obtained insertion in the litanies and other 
public prayers of those religious and happy times. 

The Abbey was refounded in 1 1 34, by Cormac, King of De*- 
mond, at which time the constitutions of the Canons Regular 
of St. Augustin were introduced and its Church was solemnly 
consecrated under the invocation of St. John the Baptist.''^ 
The succession of its abbots waR preserved unbroken until the 
sixteenth century. In the 33rd of Elizabeth, its possessions 
were confiscated, while the venerable Abbey^ which was still 

* Ware Mon. 



126 

hallowed by the virtues of Finbarr wag soon after demolished 
and became numbered among the melancholy ruins of the 
country.* 

Thb Schools of Old Leighlin in the County of Carlow^ 
deserve an high rank among the literary foundations of 
Ireland in the seventh century. St. Laserianf so distinguished 
in the Paschal controversy, having returned to his native 
country, was invited by St. Gobban to undertake the govern- 
ment of the Monastery which that Saint had some time 
before erected in the district- of old Leigblin.j: 

This establishment was considerably enlarged by Laserian 
and in the lapse of a few years contained within its cloisters 
fifteen-hundred monks.§ These men supported themselves 
by manual labour; and in consequence of their numbers and 
the fertile district in which they had been situated, they were 
enabled to receive a greater compliment of students than 
many of the other institutions. If we may except Lismore, 
the Seminary of Old Leighlin was undoubtedly the most dis- 
tinguished of those which owe their origin to the period of 
which we are now treating. Its lectures embraced the general 
literature of those times, and the fame which it had acquired 
in Ireland and in foreign countries attracted such multitudes 
of students and of religious persons to its halls that Old 
Xeighlin soon became a town of great note, and it is said 
that the country for miles around was usually denominated 
the territory of saints and scholars. This Abbey continued 
until about the middle of the eleventh century, when it was 
totally destroyed by fire.|| 

* By an inqutsititm taken in the 33rd of £liiabetli» this Abbey together with 60 
acres of land in Ballygagin — 260 acres in Kilnoony in the County of Kerry — 80 
acres north-east of Cork, and the Island of Insiquiny, parcel of its possessions 
were granted to Sir Richard Greaville, at the annusd rent of £15 8s. 6d. Irish 
money.— 'Auditor Gen. Office. 

t For Laserian, see chap. 2Qd, Old Leighlin. t A. A. S. S. p* 7dO. 

$ Vit. apud Holland. B Tr. Tb. p. 033. 



126 

The third seat of literature which shall be noticed is that of 
Taohmok in the C!oanty of Wexford. This establishment 
was founded by St. Fintan Munnu in the commencenaent of 
the seventh centuiy, and its celebrity was distinctly foretold 
by St. Colnmbkill long before St Fintan presented himself 
as a postulant at the great Monastery of Hy.* According 
to the directions of Baithen, the successor of Columbkiil, 
Fintan repaired to the Province of ]<einster, and in that part 
of it called the territory of Hy-Kinsellaghy he erected a 
Monastery, to which the celebrated School we are now treat- 
ing of was annexed.f St. Fintan Munnu in addition to his 
extraordinary piety, was one of the most enlightened men of 
his day. He spent several years in the Schools of Kilmore 
and of Bangor, after which he continued for eighteen yeans 
under the instructions of the learned Sinell at Cluain^inis in 
Lough-Erne. The Schools of Taghmon were attended by a 
great supply of teachers, and the sciences with the doctrine 
of the Scriptures and the Fathers were the principal studies 
for which it was remarkable. The Saint himself was deeply 
Tersed in scientific knowledge, of which he frequently availed 
himself in his public lectures, converting the sublime re- 
searches of Mathematics into moral instruments, and by 
means of which he shed new radiance around the sacred 
truths and impenetrable mysteries of the Christian revelation. 
He was the great opponent of Laserian in the famous contro- 
versy about the adoption of the Alexandrian cycle. Mean^ 
while his Schools were frequented by multitudes, and a large 
town was soon seen rising up on the borders of an extensive 
forest and in the heart of a lovely country, which from the 
Saint was called Tbaoh-munnu or the habitation of Munnu, 
now Taghmon.J It is unnecessary to dwell on the many 
and great advantages which religion and the character of 
the Nation had derived from this learned and hospitable 

* For St. Blunuu, 3ec chap. III. t Adamnau, L. I, f Tit. Fint. c. 32. 



127 

establishment. While it stood distinguished for the talents 
and exalted sanctity of its masters, it was equally so for the 
number of its eminent scholars, many of whom became 
afterwards the founders of literary institutions and the teach- 
ers of distant and unconverted regions. About the com- 
mencement of the eleventh century it was suffered to decline, 
and by a charter* of Biennot, King of Leinster, was 
granted as a cell to the Abbey of Ferns. 
- The celebrated Schools of Lismore must now challenge our 
attention. • 

LisMORX is situated in the County of Waterford, in the 
barony of Coshmore and on the south side of the river 
Blackwater. Its natural situation is highly calculated even 
to assist the mind of the student in its most lofty and con«* 
templative excursions, being seated almost in the centre of a 
rich and romantic valley, with the expansive bay of Dun-» 
garvan on the one side and a chain of mountains on the 
other. Here St. Carthaghi* founded his celebrated Monastery 
and School, about the year 633.% He had been, before 
this period, consecrated Bishop and became the founder of 
that See to which he gave the name of Lias-mare^ that is 
great habitation or town. In a> short time this literary 
establishment was greatly enlarged. From a wild and soli- 
tary spot, Lismore became a considerable city, and the fame 
of its Schools soon spread not only over Ireland and Britain, 
but alsato the most distant parts of the Continent. Besides 
the lectures which were read on Theological subjects; Phil- 
osophy, the Sciences, and the general literature of the day 
had been studied in its halls. Irishmen were not the only 
persons who comprised the list of its students. Numbers 
came from Albaiiia and Britain, while multitudes flocked 
from Gkul, Germany, Italy, the regions of the Danube, 
and from the most distant quarters of Europe.^ 

* Archdall Mon. t For St. C&rtbagli see c. II. t Usher, Ind. Chron. 

$ The learned Bonaventure Motqiu thus describes this great conflux of foreigners 



128 

The Schools of Lismore became still more celebrated after 
the death of St. Carthagh, and particularly under the learned 
Cataldus about the middle of the seventh century.* Then> 
indeed, Lismore had reached its apex of glory, and while 
crowds of foreigners repaired thither for instruction, numbers 
returned to their respective countries filled with gratitude 
for the hospitable reception which they had experienced* 
But the national and physical condition of this picturesque 
part of Ireland has, for the last three hundred years, under- 
gone a dismal revolution. The Schools of Lismore are 
levelled to the ground — tradition alone marks the spot where 
the genius of literature had once resided; and instead of the 
Lismore of the seventh century crowded with strangers and 
men of science from all nations, the passing traveller may 
now behold in the heart of a lovely country, a mere village 
without anything to recommend it save the recollections of 
the days that are past, Und the mouldering remains of its 
ancient grandeur. 

While literature and morality had been thus advancing, and 
the brightest epoch of the Irish Church rolling on in majestic 
order, a question arose relative to the celebration of Easter, 
which, although in itself a mere matter of discipline, seemed, 
at least for a time, to disturb the harmony which had hitherto 
prevailed. According to a rule universally received by the 

who in those days of Ireland's splendour landed on our shores and repaired in 
queat of knowledge to the literary and hospitable halls of Lismore. 

" Undique conveniunt proceres, quoe dulce trahebat 

Discendi Btadium, major num oognita virtus. 

An laudata foret. Celeres vastissimd Rbeni 

Jam vada Teutonic!, jam desernere Sicambri ; 

Mittit ab extreme gelidos Aquilone Boemos 

Albis, et Averni coeunt, Batavique frequentes, 

£t quicumque colunt alta sub rupe Gehennas. 

Non omnes prospectat Arar Rhodanique fluenta 

Helvetips; multos desiderat ultima Thule. 

Certatun hi properant diverso tramite ad urbem 

Lismoriam, juvenis primes ubi transigit annos." — Us<her, p. 765. 

• Tills Saint became afVcrwards Bishop of TarcntUBi. 



129 

Chrmtian Church> the Feast of Easter could Dot be celebrated 
before the 14th day of the first Lunar month of the year; 
that being the month in which our Saviour had risen from the 
dead. The Churches of Asia Minor observed this Festival^ 
as the Jews did their Pasch, on the 14th day itself, without 
regarding the day of the week on which it fell. On the other 
hand, the Church of Rome and the Churches of the West> 
together with those of Egypt, Palestine^ Pontus, and others^ 
did not celebrate it until the Sunday following the 14th day; 
in consequence of the Resurrection of the Redeemer having 
taken place on the first day of the week, now called Sunday* 
To establish uniformity in the observance of this great Feast, 
it was decreed by the Council of Nice, that it should be kept 
on the Sunday immediately following the 14th day of the 
first Lunar month ; and that it should not be held before the 
Vernal Equinox, lest the Church might seem to agree with 
the Jews, whose Pasch in some years fell before that period * 
This decree was accordingly received by the universal Church; 
some few, however, adhered to the former system, and by 
thus resisting the authority of the Council were cut off from 
the body of the faithful, and designated by the name of 
Quartadedmans^ Matters having been thus adj usted, another 
difficulty arose as to the mode of calculating when the first 
day of the Lunar month commenced, and this was the part of 
the question which gave rise to such disputation among out 
Irish ecclesiastics. The Jewish cycle of 84 years was that 
which was adopted by tlie primitive Christians ; it was ob« 
served by the Romans and, in short, by the whole Western 
Church in the time of St. Patrick. Some few years after the 
Council of Nice, the Church of Alexandria substituted in its 
plac^ the cycle of 19 years, invented by Anatolius, Bishop of 
Laodicea, and afterwards reformed by Eusebius of Ceesarea;* 
while the Churches of the West still adhered to the old Jewish 

* Smith *s Append, to Bede* 



130 

method of calculation. This cycle of 84 years was subject 
to many inaccuracies, and among other data, it supposed 
each lunation to be shorter than it really is by two minutes 
and some seconds.* Hence in the year 387 the Festival of 
Easter was celebrated at Rome on the 18th of April, and at 
Alexandria on the 26th: and in 417 the same feast occurred 
at Rome on the 25th of March, and atr Alexandria on the 
22nd of April. To obviate these discrepancies it was deemed 
advisable to form a new cycle. About the year 457 that of 
Victorius of Aquitain was published; and although it ap- 
proached very near to the Alexandrine computation, yet in 
many respects a very material difference existed.f At length 
about the middle of the sixth century, Dionysius Exiguus 
framed a new eycle, which in every respect corresponded 
with that of Alexandria ; it was accordingly adopted by the 
Romans, and afteiwards by the whole western world. The 
Church of Ireland received the old cycle of 84 yeai-s from St. 
Patrick, and it was in fact the computation which our Apostle 
found practised in Gaul, and in Rome also, when he had 
been in that city. This cycle was observed m Ireland with 
that veneration which our forefathers paid to every thing 
handed down to them by their beloved Apostle, and it con- 
tinued until the year 610, when St. Dagan having been in 
Britain, and meeting with Laurentius, Mellitus, and other 
Roman Prelates, a seiious controversy took place on this 
question of the Paschal computation. Shortly after a letter 
was addressed by these Prelates to the Irish Clergy on the 
same subject,}: and this it was which gave rise to various in- 
quiries as to the right method of calculating the time of 
Easter. It being a matter of discipline, or rather an astrono- 
mical question connected with the leading festivals of the 
year, some were of opinion that for the sake of uniformity the 
Roman method should be adopted ; others were for correcting 

• Uther p. 927. t Smith's DiiseiUt. t Bed« L. 2. c. 4. 



131 

the Irish system by allowiog the earliest Paschal Sunday on 
the 16th of the Moon, according to the old Roman custom, 
instead of the 14th; while the great body of the clergy held 
out and were determined not to give up the calculation which 
they had received from their predecessors. Matters thus 
stood until the year 630, when an admonitory epistle was re- 
ceived from Pope Honorius I.,* and in consequence a synod 
was held at Old Leighlin. At this synod, according to Cum- 
mian, the Bishop of Emly presided ; and it was attended by 
the successors of Kieran of Cloamacnois, of Brendan of Birr, 
of Nessan of Mungret, of Molua of CIonfert-Molua, Lase- 
rian of Old Leighlin, Fintan Munnu of Taghmon, and the 
other heads of the leading religious establishments of Ireland. 
Laserian was the principal supporter of the Roman system: 
a^uing on the ground of unanimity he maintained that the 
former cycle of 84 years should be relinquished, and that the 
one which had now been received by the other Churches of 
the western world should be substituted in its place.t His 
greatest opponent was Fintan Munnu ; and so profound was 
the reverence in which this great man held every, even the 
smallest particle of that which was delivered by SL Patrick, 
that he could not, even in a matter of mere numerical calcu* 
lation, be prevailed upon to adopt the opinion of Laserian 
and others. He insisted that the cycle of 84 years was that 
which the great Apostle of Ireland and the sainted fathers of 
the fiilh and sixth centuries had practised and bequeathed to 
htm ; that Church discipline did not in itself, essentially re- 
quire uniformity of time or place ; that as to locality and time 
discipline does and often must vary, and that if other nations 
thought proper to alter the former cycle, that was no reason 
why the Church of Ireland should give up the old Paschal- 
computation, consecrated as it had been by their sainted pre- 
decessors — by men who were distinguished for their zeal and 

• Bcdc L. 2. c. 19. f Usher p. 936, 



132 

labours in foreign countries as well as at home, and who 
justly ranked among some of the brightest ornaments of the 
Christian world. The majority of the prelates and the heads 
of the old establishments were, however, for adopting the 
computation then practised by the universal Church; de« 
daring that they had been directed by their predecessors to 
follow that invariably which was held by the successors of 
the apostles.''^ To set the matter at rest, one of the canons 
drawn up by St. Patrick was cited : this canon states "if any 
questions (difficulties) should arise in this island, let them be 
Inferred to the Apostolic See/'+ Accordingly it was resolved 
that deputies should proceed to Rome and refer the issue of 
the question to the ultimate decision of the Pontiff himself 
When these deputies had arrived at Rome they saw that 
Easter was celebrated at one and the same time by people 
from various nations, and on their return declared to the 
fathers of the Irish Church that the Roman computation was 
the one embraced by the Churches of Gaul, Italy, and of 
the whole world. After this period (633,) the Roman cycle 
was universally received all over Munster, it was adopted 
Kkewise in the greatest part of Leinster, and over a consi- 
derable portion of Connaught.J 

Although the question of the Paschal computation was 
thus disposed of in the south, it was opposed and gave rise 
to various discussions in the northern diocesses of Ireland.— 
Great numbers of the clergy in these districts were satisfied 
to receive the Roman computation, yet the great majority 
were strongly prejudiced in favour of the ancient cycle adopted 
by their forefathers. The influence which the Columbian Or- 

* Cummian Fasch. £p« 

i " Si qua qusstiones in hftc insula oriantur, ad Sedem Apostolicain referautur.'* 
This canon affords another convincing proof that the Irish Church did, fromitsYOrj 
origin, acknowledge the supremacy of the See of Rome. See Appendix No, 1% 

t Bcde L. 2. c. 3. 



133 

der possessed iu the north of Ireland was the principal cause 
to which this discrepfioicy of c^inion should be attributed. — 
Deriving its origin from St. Coiumbkill, whose name was in 
itself a sanction, this distinguished bod j could command in 
support of its system, the advocacy of men whose learning 
and acknowledged sanctity would be sufficient to establish the 
merits of any cause. Owing to these and other reasons, the 
ecclesiastics of this Order had powerful influence, both in 
Ulster and in other parts of Ireland; and having been stren- 
uous advocates of the ancient cycle, their opinion in this re- 
spect gained an overwhelming prepondei-ance in the northern 
districts of the country. Thomian was then Archbishop of 
Annagh: this Prelate witnessing the conflict of opinion 
which the Paschal question had created, and anxious like- 
wise to put a termination to its discussion, caused a letter to 
be directed to Rome in which the arguments on each side 
were fairly stated^* Although the letter of Thomian had not 
been received at Rome until after the death of Pope Seve* 
rinus, the Irish prelates and clergy had, nevertheless, an 
epistle addressed to them soon after (in 640,) by John, the 
Pope Elect, and the other beads of the Roman Church.f 

• Bcde L. 2. c. Id, 

t In this letter, (of which we have only a fragment,) there are two iMasagea 
which must be noticed. From the first of these it appears that some of tiie Irish 
clergy were considered by the writers of the letter as Quartadeeimum : "Reper2« 
mus quosdam proviociad vestre, qnartadecima luna cum Hebrsis celebrare nitcn* 
tes." This opinion, however, originated in a mistake; the Irish, no doubt, cele- 
brated the Festival of Easter on the 14th day of the mooo, if it happened to fall 
on a Sunday, but not otherwise ; they couM not, therefore, be called Quartadeei^ 
manu Again, this letter contains the following passage : *' £t hoc quoque cogno- 
vbnus, quod virus Pelagianae bspreseos apud Vos deuuo reviviscit." *' And this 
we also know, that the poison of the Pelagian heresy is again revived amongst 
you." Hence it is inferred that this heresy had then gained ground in Ireland. Th« 
infervBC^, however, cannot be admitted; for, in the first place, the Roman clergy 
m^ht have been misinformed ; and, secondly, it does not appear from any one of 
our ancient records that a Pelagian sect had ever existed in this country. Had 
such been the fact, most certainly our annalists would not have passed it over un- 
noticed.^ Sec the Fpistle of St. Columbanus to Pope Boniface IV., Appendix I, 



134 

Thb epbtle was directed <<To the Most Beloved and holy 
Thomian, Archbishop of Armagh — Columbian, Bishop of 
Clonard — Cronan, Bishop of Antrim — Dima, Bishop of 
Connor, and Baithan, Bishop of Elphin. Cronan, Abbot of 
MoTille — Emian, Abbot of Torey Island — Laistran, Abbot 
of Ardmacnasca, near Down — Scellan, Abbot of Armagh> 
and Segenus, Abbot of Bangor; together with Saran, Master 
and Teacher of Theology, and the other Scot Doctors and 
Abbots/'* Notwithstanding the tenor of this admonitory 
document, the Irish Paschal computation was generally ad* 
hered to in the province of Ulster, until about the year 
704, at which time the celebrated Adamnan of Hy acknow* 
ledged the Roman cycle, and by his influence had it after- 
wards received in every diocess throughout the northern 
districts of Ireland.f 

So stead&st were the members of the Columbian order in 
the observance of every thing delivered to them by their 
founder and received by him from St. Patrick, that these 
men, even in foreign countries, would never consent to relin- 
quish a single particle of the mere discipline which had been 
bequeathed to them by their ancestors. About the year 636, 
this learned body became highly distinguished, and by their ' 
mortified life in the cloister as well as by their labours on the 
mission, were soon recognized as so many moral luminaries 
of the Christian Church. When Oswald, King of Northum- 
berland, had been compelled to abandon his dominions and 
consult his safety by flight, he took refuge in Ireland and 
was jsoon after converted to the Christian faith. Owing to a 
variety of circumstances, his aflairs began shortly after to 
assume a more favourable appearance and Oswald being no 
longer an exile vras determined on having the Oospel of 
Christ established throughout his dominions. The Prelates of 
the Irish Church were the persons to whom this pious Prince 

• A. A. S. fi, 6th Jan. f BeUc, L. 5. c. 15. 



135 

communicated hi$ intentions, while his application was 
accompanied with a request, that a bishop should be ap- 
pointed, through whose ministry, that part of the British 
Nation might be brought to a knowledge of the Christian 
religion.* Aidan a Monk of Hy, a man of great meekness, 
was the person selected.f He was consecrated in Ireland, 
his natire country, and on his arrival in Northumberland, he 
received from Oswald the Island of Lindisfarne, since called 
''the holy Island," as a place in which his See. might be 
erected. In a very short time, Aidan assisted by a number 
of missionaries' whom he brought from Ireland, had the hap- 
piness of seeing the whole of that wild and extensive district 
converted to the faith of Christ. He formed congregations, 
erected churches, and ultimately succeeded in establishing a 
celebrated Monastery in the Island of Lindisfarne. Paulinns 
who had been Archbishop of York, had, some time pre- 
viously, retired from his See and fixed his residence in Kent: 
for which reason the mission of Aidan took in a great scope 
of the Northern district of Britain, comprehending also the 
extensive diocess of York4 It is a remarkable fact that, for 
thirty years, this diocess, so celebrated in ecclesiastical hisr 
tory, was governed by Irishmen;! while the sees of their 
own country instead of wanting the aid of a foreigner, 
poured out missionaries in numbers, besides many prelates, 
whose learning, labours and sufferings reflect honour on the 
land of their birth and justly merit insertion on the pages of 
our martyrology. Aidan continued to govern this district 
until 661. Several writers have passed very high and well- 
merited ^icomiums on the virtues of this apostolic man* 
Among these the following testimony from the pen of Bede 
may be selected. ''His instructions were well received by 
every one, because he did not teach otherwise than as he 
lived with his companions. He neither sought the things of 

«A.A.S.S.p.46. tBede,L.3.c,5« |Bede,L.2.c. 14. jStmonof Durham, Epist. 



136 

thb world nor cared for them — whatever h^ got itotn kihgs 
or wealthy persons he distributed among the poor that came 
in his way. In his journeys he travelled not on hors^back^ 
but on foot, except in some case of great necessity, so that, 
as he went along, he might address those whom he happened 
to meet, whether rich or poor, and if infidels, exhort them 
to embrace the Christian faith; if already believers, confirm 
them in it. He made it a rule that all those who accompa* 
nied him, whether of the clerical order or not, should be en- 
gaged in reading the Scriptures or in getting the Psalms by 
heart. Prom his example, religious persons of both sexes^ 
adopted the practice of fasting until None (three m the after-- 
noon) on every Wednesday and Friday in the year, except 
Easter and Whitsuntide. He never overlookedi either 
through respect or fear, the transgressions of the rich and 
severely reprimanded them if guilty. He made no presents 
to the powerful, although he used to treat them with eccleei- 
astical hospitality, but on the contrary, he either gave to 
the poor whatever money he obtained from the wealthy, or 
laid it out on the redemption of slaves, several of whom he 
afterwards instructed and even raised to the priesthood."* 
The reverence which this great man paid to every thing de- 
livered down by his ancestors, was such, that no arguments 
could dissuade him from following the computation which he 
had received in his own country. Hence Bede says: ''that 
as every one knew he could not celebrate Easter contrary to 
the practice of those who sent him, he diligently fulfilled 
every Christian duty like all other saints, and accordingly 
was beloved by all, even by those who differed from him on 
that point, and was held in veneration not only by the 
people at large, but likewise by the Bishops Honorius of 
Canterbury and Felix of the East Angles.^f According to 
Harris, Aidan was the author of several learned commenta- 

• Bede, L. 3. c. 5. t W. c. 26, 



137 

ries dn thift Scriptures, Homilies and other tracts. He died 
A.D. 661, and on the Slst of August. Aidan was suc- 
ceeded in the See of Lindisfame by Finan, an Irishman and 
a membw likewise of the Columbian order.* In the com- 
mencement of his episcopacy, Finan converted to the foith 
Peada, Prince of the middle Angles, and son of Penda the 
pagan King of the Mercians. This event having prepared 
the way for the still further progress of the Gospel, he 
ordained four Priests^ Gedd, Add, Betti and Diuma for the 
mission of that country. These he committed to the care of 
the Prince, and after having with great perseverance sur- 
mounted many difficulties, they at length succeeded in 
bringing over the great body of the Mercians to the Christiaii 
iaith. About the same time this holy Prelate converted also 
Sigberet) King of the East Saxons^ and consecrated Cedd 
Bishop of that Nation. Finan, afte^ a most laborious mia-^ 
sion^ in which he rendered inestimable service to the British 
Nation, died A. D. 660.t Colman, a native of the County 
of Mayo and a member of the Columbian order, succeeded 
Finan in the government of Lindisfemei This Prelate had 
scarcely arrived in Northumberland When the controversy, 
relative to the celebration of Easter, was renewed and carried 
on with greater warmth than it had been during the incum*** 
bency of his predecessors. The question was discussed in a 
Synod held in the nunnery of Strenaeshalch (Whitby) and at 
which the two Kings Oswin and Alchfrid attended. Colman 
and the Irish clergy with others, argued strongly in fivour of 
the ancient system; while Agilbert Bishop of the West 
Saxons with the Priests Agathon and Wilfrid contended for 
the new computation. After many principles had been ad« 
vanced on both sides, the King declared in favour of the 
Roman practice, in which he was joined by the great ma« 
jorityof the assembly; Colman, however, would not consent 

• Be<U, L. 3. c. 17. t A«a Fin. it 9, JuA. 



138 

to abandon the Irish systemy and 6oon after reogDcd the 
See of landisfamey (A. D. 664,) after it had been governed 
by Irish Prelates for upwards of thirty years,* On his de- 
parture from Lindisfamey Colman took with him all the 
Irish and about thirty of the English monks, and soon after 
erected a Monastery at Innisboffin, a small island in the 
ocean, off the barony of Morisk, in the County of Majro-t 
His next foundation was at Maqh-xo, now Mayo, whither 
he removed the English monks, leaving the Irish members 
in the Monastery of the island. The establishment of Mayo 
was, in the time of Bede, possessed by English monks; 
and Usher observes, from the book of Ballymote, that in 
Adanmaib's time, about the end of the seventh century, there 
were one hundred Saxon ot English saints in this Monastery* 
Frotik the En^isfa settlement in that fdace, this town had 
been called Maigh-wi'Sasion, or Mayo of the English, and 
in course of time it became very considerable and the see of 
a bishop. Archdall, Colgan and others most stningely 
tosert, that these English monks and even Colman himself 
had been of the Benedictine order, and that they were the 
first of that body who had settled in Ireland. Had this 
been the fttct, these men instead of being opponents, would 
have been most strenuous advocates for the Roman Pas6hal 
computation; nor would they have adopted a discipline dif« 
ferent from that of their brethren in Italy, France, Britain 
and other countries. The truth is, wherever the Irish Pas* 
ohal system had prevailed, there were no Benedictines ; and 
In short) Wilfrid, the Saxon Priest, Colman's principal 
'antagonist in Northumberland, assures us, that he was the 
person who first introduced the order of St. BenedicI into 
that part of Britain.;}^ Viewing this subject on historical 
-grounds, it is certain, that the Monks of Mayo w^re not 
Benedictines^^they and their patron Ccdman bdonged to the 

• Bede, L. 3. c. 96. f VMt, Ind. ChroB. t William of MalMeflbury , L. 3. 



139 

iaatitaie of &U Golumbkill; idiich at tliat period was the 
most leftraed as well aa tlie moat rigoroua order in either 
Britain or Ineland. . Colman died on the 8th of August, and 
in the year 676* 

All our ancient vriteni and many foreign contemporaries 
bear testimony to the high character which the Chureh of 
lieland had at this period maintained throughoatthe Christian 
worid. Such was the reputation in which our Irish establish- 
ments had been held, not only for sanctity and learning but, 
moneover, for hospitality and attention to strangers, that 
Bede assures us, ''Many nobles and others of the English 
nation wepe living in Ireland, whither they had r^atred, 
either to eultivate the sacred studies or to lead a life of greater 
strictness. Some of them soon became nuMiks, others were 
better pleased to apply to reading and stqdy, going about 
fiom school to school tbrongh the cells of the masters; and 
uU of them were most cheerfully received by the Irish, who 
supplied .them gratis with good books and instruction/'f 

Several qpiscopal sees had been established at this period ;j^ 
diocesan r^nlationa were formed iot the advancement of dis- 
cipline; the labours of the oleigy, living, as they were, on 
Ihe gratuitous bounty of the people, excited general admira- 
tion; while the morality of their flocks called forth the eulc^ 
i>f foreign writers, and our forefathers of the seventh century 
.were held up by continental teachers as the models of Chris- 
.tian perfection. The religious retreats of the kingdom sup- 
plied the Irish Church with an abundance of valuable pastors, 
nnd sent forth an host of missionaries to the most remote 
quarters of Europe. Among these St Gall, St Fursey, and 

• Uliter AniiiU. 

t L. 3. c. 27.— Hsnce Aldlielm in his letter to Eadfrid, Bishop of Lindisftinie, 
writea: " Hibeniia quo catenratim isthinc lactores clainibus advecti cooiiuiiBt."-- 
Ep. Ilib. Syll. 

% Ste c. II. 



140 

St Kilian may be ielected ; men of apostolical sanctity, whose 
memory is to this day annually renemted in foreign countries 
and stands recorded with distinguished marks of veneration 
on the pages of Church martyrology. 

St. GalLi or Gallus was one of the principal disciples who 
had accompanied St Columbanus on his mission from Ireland* 
It will be recollected that Columbanus had removed from 
Bregentz to Milan, in 612, after having entnisted bis favour^ 
ite companion Gallus with the care of the infant congiegatioQB 
which had been formed in that hitherto benighted district — 
Animated with zeal for the conversion of this country, Gallus 
soon ftfter penetrated through the deserts with which it 
abounded, and having reached the banks of the river Stioace, 
he erected a monastery on the site where now stands the 
Town and Abbey of Gal^.* The fiune of his sanctity soon 
spread through the surrounding country, while the Almighty 
was pleased to confirm the doctrine of hia servant by number^ 
less miracles. At that time the See of Constance happened 
tp be vacant, and the prelates and clergy having assembled 
to elect a bishop, Gallus was invited by the Duke Goonzo to 
attend the meeting As soon as the Saint had entered the 
assembly, the clergy arose, and casting their eyes on the 
missioner, declared with one voice that he was the person best 
fitted for that exalted situation^f The Duke himself in the 
mean time thus addressed Gallus: ''Do you hear what diey 
say of you?" ''I wish," replied the Saint, ''that what they 
have said had been the fact; but they do not know that the 
Canons will not, unless in some very urgent case, allow per- 
sons to be ordained bishops, of districts of which tbey are not 
natives. I have a deacon named John, a native of this coun* 
try, to whom every thing that has been stated of me may be 
justly applied; and as I think him elected by the divine judg- 
ment, I propose him to you as your h«shopJ' John^ wl\o 

• Walflfrid. Strab. L, 1. t Canui^s T^5: 



141 

was both a learned and a holy mau, having been made ac- 
quainted with the proceedings of the aasemblyi concealed 
himself in the Church of St. Stephen, without the town. He 
was soon discovered, and being brought into the presence of 
the cleigy, was, on the recommendation of Gallusi elected 
and consecrated Bishop of Constance. Qn this occasioA 
OallttSi in compliance with, the wishes of the meeting, de-? 
livered a discourse which has been published by Canisius, 
and afterwards by Mesoiogham. It treated particularly oi^ 
Church govemmentj containing an abridged history of reli-i 
gion from the fell of Adapi dowp to the days of the Apostles, 
intermixed with moral a^d doctrintftl observations. 

The Abbey of Luxeu, of which St. Oolqn^bai^us was th^ 
founder, had at this time acquired a very distinguished rank 
in the religious world. Its Abbot, the learned Eustasius, 
was dead, while the members of the community determined 
on electing Gallus as hi^. successor. A deputation, accord- 
ingly, waited on the Saint, but his answer was: ''That havr 
ing abandoned his relatives and his native country, an4 
chosen a solitude for his dwelling pHce« he cpuld not thinly 
of being raised to any rank which might involve him in th^ 
cares of this world."* St. Oallns was. an assiduous preacheir 
of the Gospel, and has left behind him some sermons and 
various tracta^on the Scnpturea and on mystical theojpgy.— r 
His Psalter has been much esteemed, and was translated into 
German by Notker Balbulus in the i^eign of Amulph. Th^ 
labours and miracles of this Saint were such, that he is tp 
this day styled the Apostle of the Alemanni, or Suevi. St. 
CSallus died in the 96tth year of his age, and on the 16th of 
October, A.B. 645.t. 

About this period St. Fubsby was employed in forming a 
new and extensive mission at Lagny, and along the north- 
western coast of Gaul. Fursey was descended fro;n tlje 

* MftbiUon Anoal, Bened. ad 625, f Vitat Writers^ 



143 

kings of South Mniiflter, and received his education in the 
island of Inisqnin, in the county of Oaiiray. Rathmat^ 
near Lough Corrib, in the now deanery of Annadown, was 
his first establishment: conscious that his laboani n&ight be 
more necessary elsewhere^ he withdrew to Britain, bringing 
with him some religious men, among whom were his brothers 
Foiilan and Ultan. The Saint having been kindly received 
by -Sigberet, King of the East Angles, erected a monas* 
tery near Baigh Castle, in Suflfolk, in the heart of a forest * 
and adjoining the oeean,^ He looked upon this retreat 
as the most fitted for a contemplative life; and having beeii 
surrounded at the time with a population grossly ignorant and 
partly unconverted, his labours, it is said, were extraordinary 
and most successful. By his counsel Sigberet, after having re* 
signed the sceptre to his kinsman Eyrio, retired ftx>m the world 
and embraced the monastic state. Pendsi King of the Mer«- 
cians, conceiving this a convenient opportunity for enlarge, 
ing his dominion, took the field and appeared at the head of 
fi considerable army. While the affairs of Eyrie were placed 
in this critical posture, Sigberet was prevailed vepoa by his 
(brmer subjects to come forth from his favourite solitude and 
animate them in the conflict. The pious king complied with 
their wishes: he appeared in the midst of the engagement 
with only a wand in his hand, when victory declared in 
favour of the Mercians, and Sigberet mtk his relative re^ 
inained amongst the number of the slain. Soon after this 
unfavourable event, Fursey wishing to lead a more retired 
life, gave up the care of ibe Mon^tery to his brother Foil^ 
Ian iind withdrew to France. On his way dirough Ponthiett 
(tnd at a place called Mazeroeles, he raised the son of iho 
Duke Haymon to life; and pursuing bis journey was well 
reo^ved by Olovis II. King of Nenstria and fiucgundy.tt* 
This Prince admiring the sanctity of our missionaries .and 

• Bed^ L. 3. c, 19. t Acts L. S. cj. 



143 



desirous that Farsey should settle in his dominions, assigned 
him some land at Latiniacurii, (Lagny,) near Ae Mamci 
about six leagues from Paris, where he erected a monastery 
in the year 644, Here the labours of this great man were 
required and appreciated; while his establishment at Lagny 
continued for centuries an asylum for the oppressed^ and the 
fruitful nursery of scholars and saints. St. Fursey died at 
Macerias, on the 16th of January, A.D. 660; but his re- 
mains were afterwards translated to Peronne, in Picardy, 
and interred on the east side of the high altar.. The Ulster 
Annals, Mabillon, Desmay, and other authorities state that 
St. Fursey was a bishop, although neither Bede or the Acts 
give him this title. Among those of his disciples who were 
natives of Ireland, and whose services are to this day re- 
corded in various parts of the Continent, may be mentioned 
Eloquius, Adalgisus, Malguil, Lactan, Mombulus, Frede- 
gand, Abbots. Bertuin, Bishop of Maconia, in the territory 
of Liege, and Etto, Bishop and Apostle of the Avemes.* 
^ The name of St. Ktliak, the ilhistrious Apostle of Fran- 
eonia, stands high in the martyrolc^es of those times. This 
Saint having been raised to the episcopacy in Ireland, his 
native country, withdrew about the year 686 to the Conti- 
nent, accompanied by a number of ^missionaries, among 
whom were Coloman a Priest and Totnan a Deacon.+ 
Among the inhabitants of Wurtzburg in Franconia pagan- 
ism had still prevailed; thither, therefore, Xilian proceeded, 
having first obtained the sanction of Conon who then 
presided in the Apostolic See. By the preaching and power- 
ful example of this great man, the truths of the Grospel 
made an amazing progress throughout the extensive territory 
of Franconia. Gozbert the ruHng prince embraced the 
Christian faith; while the labours of our missionaries became 
every day more successful. The marriage of this Prince 

♦ A, A. S. S. p. 96. t MessingKam Floril. p. 324. 



144 

with Geilana, the wife of his brother, had, after some time, 
called forth the admonitioiis of Kilian; he represented to the 
Prince the impropriety of such a connexion, and the re- 
moval of Geilana was accordingly agreed to by Gozbert. — 
This circumstance, however, terminated in the martyrdom 
of Kiliaii* Geilana having been made acquainted with the 
intentions of the Prince procured two assassins, who entered 
the Church at night, while Kilian with his companions Colo- 
man and Totnan had been singing the divine Office."*^ They 
cheerfully submitted to the will of heaven, and suffered on 
the 8th of July, A.D. 689. Their remains were interred in 
the Church of Wurtzburg, where St Kilian is revered as its 
Apostle and Patron. 

The catalogue of our Irish saints, who in the seventh 
century became the lights and apostles of distant countries, 
is such, that volumes would be required to comprise their 
biography. St. Fiachrei after having fixed his residence in the 
wilds of Breuil in Gaul, preached the Gospel to the uncultivated 
tribesof that vast territory, and converted multitudes. St. Mail- 
duf, from whom Malmsbury in England has been named, intro- 
duced literature into that place. St. Livin converted the pagan 
inhabitants of Flanders and Brabant. St. Vulgarius preached 
to the Morini. Sts. Caidoc and Fricon to the people of Pon- 
theu. St. Tressan with his companions GKbriam, Uelam, and 
Petram announced the Gospel atRheims, and along the dis- 
trict of Chalons-sur-Mame. St Cataldus was venerated at Ta- 
rentum: St. Donatus at Naples ;t whilst the successors of St 
Columbanus and a host of others spread the Gospel through 
the trackless recesses of the Alps^ and penetrating to the 
north, made the mountains and forests of Germany and 
Scandinavia resound with the glad tidings of redemption. 

Meanwhile the Church of Ireland shone forth with new 
and increased lustre, and the sanctity of her ecclesiastics, 

* MtMiogfham FlorU. p. 324 t AcU BolUnd. l;.o. 



145 

both on the mission and in the cloistier, fully illustrated the 
excellence of those instatations, which from the d^ys of her 
Apostle she had so ardently cherished. At the close of the 
seventh century, and during the intumbency of the Primate 
Flan Febhla, a national synod was convened for the purpose 
of effecting the final settlemtat of the Paschal question and 
of making other ecciesiastkuil arrangements.* Among the 
Fatheps who composed this Synod we find St. Aidus or Aedh, 
Bishop of Sletty; Colga, Abbot of Lusk; Killen, Abbot of 
Saigar; SU Masacra, fc^Onder and Abbot of Tegh-Sacra, now 
Saggard in the Gounty of Dublin, and St. Mochonna, who 
subscribed the acts of die Synod under the title of AntUtes 
JDarensis, 

The Acts df this Synod hav6 partly perished amid thd 
storms of succeeding ages; however, many of its canons are 
extant, and may serve to illustrate the usages as well as the 
religious spirit which had so generally prevailed in those 
ancient times.t Of these canons there are some which refeir 
immediately to the priesthood; others have a reference to the 
sanctuaify, and to the respect which by every right must 
belong to the material temple of the Most iligh. The man- 
ner in which the episcopal election had been conducted in 
the ancient Church of Ireland is thus described t ^'The 
Bishop is to be ordained with the consent of the clergy, and 
of the laity, and of the bidhops of the whole province, but 
especially of the Metropolitan, either by his epistle, or by 
his authority, or his presence, "j; The next canon prescribes 
the age required in Ireland at this early period for the re- 
ception of the difierent* orders: ''A person attached to the 

♦ Tr. th. p. 21S. 

t Juxta M.S. Vardei in Archiv. Isodor, et D'Achery. Specil. Tom. IX. 

t Synodns decrevit, cum consensu Clericoriim, etLaicorum, et tolius provinciss 
Eptscoponim, maximeqne Metropolitani, vel epistola, yel auctoritate, Tel priesea* 
tia ordinctuf Episcopus. 

T 



146 

sacred ministry from his youth must rwutin a Lector or aa 
Exorcist until the twentieth year of his age: a Subdeaooa 
four yearsi a Deacon five: at thirty he may be ordained, 
a Priest, that being the age at which Christ began to 
preach; and at thirty, forty, or fifty a Bishop/^* AgaiOp 
'^ Should it be deemed necessary at any time to promote 
a layman considerably advanced in years to the episco* 
pacy; he must be two years a Lector^ five years a Sub* 
deacon^ and after twelve years a Priest, he may receive 
Episcopal Ordinatian."t According to the tenth canon, it be^ 
came unlawful for a Bishq) to appoint his successor: ''No 
Bishop shall during his life constitute his successor, but after 
his death let a deserving man be elected by the prop^ per- 
sons/'j: Before entering on the canons which refer to simple 
priests, the Synod by way of preface decreed: "The Church 
now ofiers the sacrifice in many manners, (for many reasons^) 
first, for herself; secondly for a commemoration of Jesus 
Christ, who said ''Do this for a commemoration of me;" 
thirdly, for the souls of the faithful departed/'^ To secure 
the constant residence of the clergy, the Synod in the next 
canon decreed: "That a Priest may be absent but one day 
from his church; but should he be absent for two days, he 
must do penance for seven on bread and water. In like man- 
ner, should he be absent one Sunday from the church, he 
must do penance for twenty days on bread and water; but 

* '* Puer yero ab infantia Ecclesiasticis Mioisteiiis deditus usque ad vigesimom 
Atatissueannnni, Lector, sive Ezorcista stet : Subdiaconus quatuor annis: Diaco- 
nnt quiaque : Presbyter trigesimo efiiciatar quia in ea etate Christus prsdicare 
onus est : Episcopus vel trigesimo, vel quadrag^sino, Tel quinquagesimo." 

t " Si vero grandis elatis sit Laicus et necesse sit ut Episcopus fiat: biennio sit 
Lector: quinque Subdiaconus: post duodecim anoos Presbyter, Episcopus sub- 
rogetur." 

X '* Nutlus Episcopps succossorcm in vita sua faciat, scd post obitum ejus boni 
bonum eligant." 

$ " Nunc Ecdesia multis modis offert Domino : primo pro Seipsa : secuudo, pro 
commcmoratiooe Jesu Christi, qui dixit : Hoc facite in meam commemorationem : 
tertio, pro animabus defuuctorum." 



147 

if absent for two Sandays, he is to be removed from the dig- 
nity of hift station/'* By the next oanoa <^ Priests are not 
allowed to consider donations which are oflfeied either with the 
church or separstely^ as their own property, bat rather .as 
grants appertaining to the Chureh/'f By another <^The 
Priest cannot receive the oblations of a public sinner/' and 
agam, the Synod decrees <'That the Priest shall give to the 
Ohnrch whatever sapefflnities he may p06Be8a.^j: According 
to a subsequent canon ^ Any ecclesiastic who should be pre- 
sent at the public games was liable to degradation; and should 
an ecclesiastic be killed in battle or in any quarrelsome en- 
gagement, he is not to receive the benefit of the sacrifice, or 
the prayers of the Charch/'§ In conclusion, '' Ecclesiastics 
are to be reverenced; they being the pastors of the faithful 
and the servants of the great Judge/' That due reverence 
be in like manner shewn to consecrated places, the Synod 
has declared: ''Wherever you shall find the sign of the Cross 
of Christ, do no injury there/'|| And by an express canon 
"All thieves and robbers are to be cast out of the Church."^] 
The consecrated area is finally declared to have been marked 
by three distinct boundaries: the first boundary was that by 
which laymen entered; the second was allotted for females; 
the third for ecclesiastics. The first was called sacred, the 
second more sacred, and the third most sacred. 

* Sacerdos una tantum die ab Ecclesia defuerit : u duabus, poeniteat septem dci« 
bus cum pane et aqua. Item, si una Dominica ab Ecclesia defuerit, agat paeuiten- 
tiam XX dierum cum pane et aqua : si yero duabtu, snbmovendus honore gradoa 
8ui. 

t Sacerdotet quibua ab aliis aliquid siYe cum Ecclesia sive sequestratim donatar, 
Bon quasi sunm proprium, sed quasi dimissum Ecclesie computabunU 

X Sacerdos, omne quod superfluum habet, det in Ecclesia. 

f Quicumque clericus in belle ant in riza mortuus fuerit, noque oblatbne, ae- 
quo oratione postuletur pro eo, sed in manus inddat Judieis: sepultura nonpriv- 
etur. 

I Ubicumque inveneritis signum Crucis Christi, ne laaeritis. 
V Fares et lalrones et raptores de Ecclesia ejicieodi sunt. 



148 

Soon after the Synod of Flan Febhla^ the learned Adam- 
nan^ Abbot of Hy, arrived in Ireland, on a Yisttatioii of the 
monasteries subject to his jurisdiction.* During ihid yisit- 
atioii Adamnan became acquainted with the nature of the 
Pasdial system which had been already obsarved in the 
south, and having decided in its favour and given it his 
sanction, it became in the eighth century the rule universally 
received and invariably practised in the several districts of 
-the north and west, and ultimately throughout all Irehlid^ 

* Vil^. Iqd. Cbion. See Ceot. YllJUCh^p. 1^ 



CHAPTER IL 

Buceesters of St Patnck-^JEpiscopal See$-^Jieligiau$ 
Faumdatkm^ of tie Seventh Century. 

Sbnach, Archbishop of Aimagh^ was socceeded in 610 by 
Mag Laibrb. According to Colgan this Prelate was moi'e 
properly named Tbbbnnan, and he is said to have held a 
correspondence with Laurence of Canterbury on the Paschal 
question: his successor was Thomiait, AJD. 623. Thonian 
'was of noble birth, distinguished for discipline and zeal, and 
a great encourager of learning. The active part which he 
had taken in th^ Paschal . controversy has been already 
noticed, and in the letter written by the Roman clei^ on 
that subject, in 640, and addressed to the Irish Prelates, 
Priests, and Abbots, the name of Tbomian stands first on 
the list: he died A.D, 661, and was succeeded by Sbgen.-^ 
Of this Prelate we find very little recorded: his incumbency 
continued until 688, in which year he died at Armagh, and 
had for his successor Flak Fbbhla. Under this Primate 
the Synod already mentioned took place; and after having 
governed the Metropolitan See for twenty-seven years with 
great advantage to religion, he died on the 24th of April^ 
A.D.71fi* 

We now proceed to give a brief historical outline of the 
Episcopal Sees established during the seventh century. 

The Seb of Fehns was founded by St. Aidan or Maidoc, 
about the year 600. Aidan was of an illustrious family in 
Connaught; his Father, Letna, having been descended from 
Brian, Prince of the Hy-bruin sept in Breffny, and his 

*Ware Biahopa. 



150 

Mother from the high and ancient race of Auli.* When a 
youth, Aidan was one of the hostages whom the people of 
Breffny had been obliged to give to Anmiracusi King of 
Ireland; and some time after his liberation, he withdrew 
from his native country and retired to the establishment of 
St. David at Menevia in Wales. Here his extra<mlinary 
sanctity soon rendered him cdebrated. About the year 
689 Aidan departed fiom Menevia, and having landed in the 
now County of Wexford^ he erected a Church at a place 
called Ardlathran, in the southern part of that county. His 
next establishment was at Clonemore in the barony of 
Bantry, and having been held in great reverence by Biandubh 
King of Leinster, that Prince assigned him a site on which 
he erected his celebrated Monastery of Ferns, about the year 
600. At the request of Brandubh, a numerous Synod wad 
soon after convened, in which it was decreed that Ferns 
should become an Episcopal See and be moreover raised to 
the dignity of Archbishopric of Leinster. On this occasion 
Aidan was consecrated its first Bishop.f Usher remarks 
that by this decree, the Archiepiscopate of Leinster had beeii 
removed from Sletty but was afterwards transferred from 
Ferns to Kildare.;]: It is at all events most ceHain, that 
these so called Archbishops, whether of Sletty or of Ferns, 
were not, strictly speaking, Metropolitans; nor were they 
invested with Archiepisoopal power or that jurisdiction pro^ 
vided by the Canon law. They enjoyed, by courtesy and 
very often through the favour of princes, a degree of honor* 
ary pre-eminence; and for this reason we find the title pass- 
ing in those days from one see to another* The reputation 
of St. Aidan was not confined to Ireland. His memory has 
been highly revered both in Wales and in other countries, 
and several miracles have been attributed to him. He died 
on the Slst of January, A. D. 632, and was buried at 

• A. A. S. S. p. 216. t Vita, c. 28. t Usher, p. 965. 



151 

Feni».* St* Aidan was succeeded in the See of Ferns by 
St Moling, a native of the territory of Hy-Kinsellagh. 
Between the death of this Prelate and the incumbency of 
the learned Alban O'Mulloy in the twelfth century, the 
names of fifteen Bishops have been recorded, while their 
acts, like most of our other national documents have perished 
bemeath the fury of the Danes or the still more unsparing ra- 
pacity of the English invaders. 

Thb Sbb op Cork derived its foundation from St Barr or 
Finbanr, about the year 606. This Saint, as has been already 
noticed, was a native of Connanght;t he was a great favour* 
ite with St Aidan of Ferns, and accompanied him on his 
journey to Britain and from thence to Rome« Finbarr on 
Us return to Ireland, and being then a Bishop, founded a 
Monastery near Lough-eire, now the south side of the City 
pf Cork, and here also he established his See. It has been 
asserted by some writers that St Finbarr had erected a 
Cathedral in Cork totally distinct from the Church attached 
to the Monastery; but this is an opinion altogether unsup- 
ported by any authority. During this period of our history, 
several abbots were bishops and lived in their monasteries; 
hence it is that the catalogue of St. Finbarr's successors is 
for a loi^ time after his death very confused. Nessan, his 
favourite disciple, is mentioned by Ware as a successor of St 
Barr in the See of Cork; however, according to Colgan, 
Nessan was only a simple priest j: It must also be noticed 
that, in most of our Annals, the epithet Comorban has been 
affixed to the names of many of the successors of St» Finbarr, 
and this term, being with equal propriety, applicable to 
bishops and abbots, creates an uncertainty and in several 
cases leaves the rank of the individual undetermined. Of 
all the ancient cities in the kingdom, that of Cork suffered 
most severely from the fury of the Danes, having been 

* Usher, p. 9^. t See c. I. % Colgao at ITth March. 



162 

eleven times plundered during the lapse of a single century. 
In 070, the Cathedral and the great Abbey of St Finbarr 
were pillaged and almost levelled to the ground by these in- 
vadersy while the records of the See with other- valuable 
monuments of those ancient times were swept away and 
perished amidst the general wreck that surrounded them.* 
For this reason the succession of Prelates is very imperfect 
until 1152, when the learned Gilla-.£da-0'Mugin was 
Bishop of Cork, and attended with most of the other digni- 
taries of Ireland at the Council of Kells. From that period 
the chain of succession is unbroken, while the transactions 
of this See form an interesting portion of the history of 
the twelfth and succeeding centuries. St. Finbarr died at 
Cloyne on the 25th of September, A. D. 623, and was in- 
terred in Cork. 

The Ssfi of Kilmacduaoh had for its founder St. Colman, 
about the year 620. This Saint v^as of the high and princely 
family of Hua Fiachra of Connaught, and was nearly related 
to Guaire, King of that province. His Father's name being 
Duach, the Saint has hence been sumamed Mac Duach; by 
this appellation he is more generally known than by that of 
Colman. In the early part of his life, Colman lived as an 
hermit in the forest of Burren, County of Clare; his only 
food being wild herbs and water cresses, while deer-skins 
served him for clothes. Ghiaire having been made ac- 
quainted with the sanctity of this great man ofiered him a 
large tract of ground for the establishment of a religious 
community; the Saint however accepted of only a small site 
on which he erected his Monastery and shortly after became 
Bishop.f St. Colman's labours in this part of Ireland con- 
tributed greatly to the splendour of the Gospel. The year 
of his death has not been ascertained, but his natalis is 
marked in the calendars on the 3rd of February. Of his 

• M'Curtin, p. 207. t A. A. S. S. p. 219. 



153 

flttccessora in the See we find yery little recorded until the 
time of the Council of Kelts in 1162. 

Thb Sbe of Lbighlin had the learned Laserian for its 
founder. This Saint was the son of Cairel, a nobleman of 
Ulster, and of Gemma/ daughter of Aiden, King of the 
British Scots. Laserian studied under the Abbot Murin, and 
afterwards spent fourteen years at Romci where he was 
ordabed Priest by Pope Gregory the Great. About the year 
630, and during the period of the Paschal controversy, Lase* 
rian made a second journey to Rome, most probably as head 
of the deputation sent by the southern clergy after the Synod 
of Old Leighlin. At this time he was consecrated Bishop by 
Pope Honorius L* On his return to Ireland in 633, he 
established the See of Leighlin and contributed much towards 
the settlement of the Paschal computation in the south. St. 
Laserian, whose name was greatly revered throughout Ireland, 
died on the 18th of April, A. D. 639, and was buried in his 
own Cathedral at Old Leighlin^f 

This See continued to be governed by a succession of 
Prelates until the eighteenth century, when it became united 
to Kildare« 

Thx Srb of Lismobb was established by the venerable 
St. Carthagh, in the year 633. This Saint who is sometimes 
called Mochuda, was bom in Kerry about the middle of 
the sixth century.:]: Having studied for several years under 
St Comgall of Bangor, Carthagh removed to Clonfert-molua, 
for the purpose of practising greater austerity and of becom- 
ing acquainted with the nature of monastic discipline. His 
first establishment was at Rathen, in the now County of 
Westmeath. Here he drew up a rule for his monks, and 
continuing at Rathen for forty years, was consecrated Bishop. 
Notwithstanding the great sanctity of Carthagh and his com- 
munityi they were compelled to leave Rathen by the cruelty 

* Usber, p. 938. f AnnaU of Inavf. t Keating, B. 2. 

U 



154 

of Bathmacy Prince of that country, bat having been after* 
wards kindly received by Moelochtride, Prince of Nandesi^ 
and obtaining the tract of land in which Lismore is situated, 
Ihey settled there, and CSarthagh founded his celebrated 
Monastery.* It soon became an episcopal See and continued 
to be governed by its Prelates in succession until the year 
1363, when it was united to the diocess of Waterford.f The 
founder, St. Carthagh, having retired to a lonely valley at the 
east end of the town, spent the last years of his life in con* 
templation and prayer. He died on the 14th of May, A. D« 
637, and was buried at Lismore. 

Tub Sbb of Glekdaloch. There appears a great diversity 
of opinion among our annalists regarding the first bishop of 
this ancient See. Colgan and Harris assert that St. Kevin 
was a Bishop, and of course the founder of the See of Olen-- 
daloch. However, on the authority of the best records it is 
certain that St. Kevin was only an Abbot* The first Bishop we 
meet with in this diocess is St. Libba or Molibba. He was a 
nephew of St. Kevin and flourished in the early part of the 
seventh century.^: St. Libba died on the Sth of January, 
but the year has not been ascertained. The See of Glenda« 
loch was united in the thirteenth century to that of Dubiin.^ 

To these Episcopal Sees, founded in the seventh century^ 
may be added, that of Clonmagnois governed by St. Baitan^ 
A. D. 633— Trim, in the County of Meath, established by 
St. Loman. The memory of this Saint is revered at Trim on 
the 17th of February — ^The See of Abdbraccan in Meath 
was founded by St. Ultan: he died on the 4th of September^ 
A. D. 667.— The See of Lusk in the County of Dublin, had 
St. Petranus for its Bishop.— ^t. Murgeus presided at Glean* 
ussen in the Queen's County. — St. Gobban at Inspict, in the 
County of Cork.— ^t. Dagan at Achad«Dagan, in the County 

♦ Life, c. 4. t See Centniy 14. 

f Colgan at 8ib Jud. j See Century 13. 



155 

of Waterfordy and several others meationed in the third class 
of Irish saints. 

Thus at the close of the seventh century, the episcopal 
aees established in Ireland, if arranged according to the order 
of the present day, were: in Ulster — ^the Metropolitan See of 
Armagh — the Sees of Ardagh, Clogher, Dromore, Connor — 
Down and Clonard, (Meath.) In Leinster— Kildaie, Ossory, 
Ferns, Leighlin and Glendaloch* In Munster^-^Emly, Cloyne^ 
Ross, Cork and Lismore. In Connaught — ^Tuam, Elphin, 
Killala, Clonfert, Ach<»iry and Kilmacduagh. Besides the 
Bumerotts minor sees already mentioned, and which in the 
.seventh century were governed by their respective bishops, 
but have been since united either to the above-mentioned 
bishoprics or to others which shall be noticed in succeeding 
centuries. 

The principal monasteries founded in the seventh century 
must now challenge our consideration. Our Monasticons 
furnish us with a lengthened catalogue, out of which the fol- 
lowing establishments shall be selected. 

Thb Monastbby of Clonbmobb, in the barony of Bantry 
.and County of Wexford, bad St. Aidan for its founder, and 
it appears to have been erected about the same period with the 
See of Ferns. It was a place of great celebrity during thi0 
and the following age, and is hallowed by the remains of 
many eminent and saintly men, among whom may be num- 
bered Dichulla, to whom the founder resigned its adminis- 
tration, St. Ternoc who flourished about the same period, 
and the sainted Finian, sumamed the Leper, who died and 
.was interred here, A. D» 680.* During the ninth century, 
when the fury of the Danes appeared to have been pointedly 
levelled against the religious establishments in this part of 
Ireland, the retreat of Clonemore exhibited on many occasions 
a frightful scene of desolation. The massacre which had 

• A.A.S.S, p. 628, 



156 

taken place within its hallowed sanctoary in 833, is particu- 
larly noticed by most of our ancient annalists. On Christmas 
night during that year, while the community had been assist- 
ing Jit the divine mysteries, an armed multitude of these 
Ostmen forced their way into the Church, and after having 
committed various acts of sacrilege, completed their barbarity 
by putting the Abbot and his brethren indiscriminately to the 
sword.* At the close of the tenth century it began to 
decline, and became a complete ruin about the year i041.t 

The Abbey of Roscrea in the County of Tipperary, was 
established by St Cronan about the year 606,j: and soon 
after its foundation, Roscrea became an extensive town. 
During the seventh and following centuries a celebrated 
School was attached to this Abbey; it became particularly 
distinguished for the number of its learned professors, while 
its hospitality made it a home and a house of comfort for the 
poor and afflicted. In 1174, during the administration of 
Failan, its last superior, this Abbey became a ruin. 

The Monastery of Cong, situated in the County of Mayo, 
between Lough-Corrib and Lough-Mask, was founded in the 
year 624, by Donald, a nephew of Amirach, King df Ireland. 
St. Fechin of Fore presided for some years over this establish- 
ment. The constitutions of this house were remarkably 
austere. It had been for many ages celebiuted as a place of 
holy retirement and penance; hence we find at different 
periods several characters of exalted rank renouncing the 
world and taking shelter within its^solitary and hallowed 
walls. Among the number of those may be noticed the 
Monarch Roderic O'Connor, the last king of Ireland. This 
Prince, ttfter witnessing the overthrow of his Kingdom, re- 
tired to the Monastery of Cong, where he died with great 
resignation, A. D. 1 198, and in the 82nd year of his age. 
He was, however, interred at Clonmacnois.§ It was governed 

* Four Marten. t Idem. t S«c c. iii. for Cronan. § Ogygia^ 441. 



157 

by its abbots in regular succession until the sixteenth century. 
:£neas McDonnell was the last Abbot, when its possessions 
became merged in the general confiscation. According to an 
inquisition taken in the 36th of Elizabeth, the property, or 
rather parcels of it, consisted of fifteen townlands, situated 
in the Counties of Mayo and Roscommon, together with 
Tarious rectories and their tithes. A considerable part of the 
splendid possessions of this Abbey were granted by Elizabeth^ 
at an annual rent, to the Provost and Fellows of Trinity Col- 
lege, Dublin; while a lease in reversion of the Abbey, for 
fifty years, was given to Sir John King, ancestor to the Earl 
of Kingston.* 

Thb Abbey of Forb, in the County of Westmeath, was 
founded by St. Fechin about the year 630.t Fore in a very 
short time became a celebrated town, and in this Abbey the 
Saint is said at one time to have governed three hundred 
monks ;:|: according to some authors thi^ee thousand. Its 
Abbots continued in regular succession down to the sixteenth 
century. In 736, St. Surlach was Abbot and Bishop of Fore, 
and after his time the episcopal dignity was likewise invested 
in several of its abbots. The Abbey together with the town 
of Fore had been six times destroyed by fire, and in 1209 it 
was rebuilt by Walter De Lacy, under the invocation of St. 
Taurin and St. Fechin, for Benedictines whom he had brought 
firom the Monastery of St. Taurin in Evereux, Normandy. 
The last Abbot was William Nugent, and in the 31st of 
Henry VIII. an inquisition was held, and the possessions con- 
sisting of 1300 acres of pasture and arable land, with twenty- 
eight rectories, situated in the Counties of Westmeath and 

* Chief Remembrancer. t See c. 3. at Fechin. 

^ In a hymn for the office of St. Fechin, we read : — 
** Dehioc fait Monachorum 
Dux et Pater trecentorum 
Quos instruxit lege morum 
Murus contra Vitia." Amen. Four Masters. 



158 

Cavan were coafiscated. Id 1688, a lease of the Abbey and 
of its possessions was granted to Christopher, Baron of Del- 
vin* Thus, the great Abbey of Fore, which had once been 
the seat of literature, the nursery of saints and the asylum of 
the poor, became involved in the same common wreck with 
the other religious institutions of the country. 

The Monastbrt of Swobds, in the County of Dublini 
pxkd Barony of Coolock, had St. Finan, sumamed the Leper, 
for its founder. St. Finan was a member of the Columbian 
Order, and after having erected several monasteries in various 
parts of Ireland, died about 680. From the year 1069 ontil 
the middle of the twelfth century, the town and Abbey of 
Swords were almost one continued scene of desolation; hav- 
ing been during that period no less than eight times stormed 
and laid waste by fire and sword. At length, in 1166, Swords 
had been nearly depopulated, and the Abbey became a niin.t 

Thb Abbbt of Innisfallbm in the Lake of Killamey, 
was founded by St. Finian Lobhar, about the year 640. j: — 
Finian was a native of Ely O'CaiTOl, King's County, and 
was lineally descended from the celebrated Oilild Olum, 
King of Munster. The Annals of Innisfallen inform ns that 
this Abbey was esteemed a paradise, and had been for many 
centuries a secure sanctuary in which the wealth and most 
valuable e£fects of the whole country were deposited. Among 
its learned men should be mentioned the venerable Gilla 
Patrick O'Huihair: he was a celebrated poet, a philosopher, 
and the founder of several religious houses.^ The Abbots of 
Innisfallen continued in regular succession until the sis> 
teenth century, when the Abbey was plundered, and its pos^ 
sessions granted by Elizabeth .to a person named Robert Col- 
lan.t| 

* Aad. Gen. f Tr. Th . p. 643. t A . A. S. S. p. 628. $ Annal. Munst. 

II The Inquisition taken in the 37th of Elizabeth presents us with only a portion 
of the possessions of this Abbey ; viz ; 180 acres of arable land and the advowson 
of the Churches of Killcrtee, Terlogin, Kenmarfi and Kilcotnao, — Chief Bemem- 
bnincer. 



169 

Thb Abbey op Faham on Loagh Swillyi in Innishowen, 
Connty of Donegal, was fonnded by St Mura, about the 
middle of the seventh century. This Saint was of the 
Columbian Order, and his memory, which is revered on the 
12th of March, has been held in great veneration. The 
Abbey of Fahan was richly endowed and highly venerated, 
not only (says Archdall) 'Mn consequence of the hallowed re* 
verence paid to St. Mura, to whom the great Church is dedi- 
cated, but also for the many monuments of antiquity which 
remained here till they had been destroyed in the sixteenth 
century. Among the few reliques that had been preserved 
was the Book of the Acts of St Columbkill, written by St. 
Mura in Irish verse, some fragments of which yet remain; 
also a very large and ancient chronicle, held in great repute; 
and the pastoral staff of St. Mura, richly ornamented with 
jewels and gilding, and which is still retained by a family of 
the O'Neils."* 

Owing to the limits of this work the following Monasteries 
selected out of the number erected in the seventh century, shall 
be merely noticed. 

The Abbey of Mayo, founded by St. Colman, suppressed 
by Elizabeth, and granted at an annual rent to the bui^esses 
and commonality of the town of Gralway.f Clashmobb, iu 
the County of Waterford, founded by St. Mochoemoc^ the 
possessions were granted to Sir Walter Raleigh.j: Tbim, in 
the County of Meath, founded by St. Loman. Camboss, in 
the County of Wexford, founded by St. Abban. Cabksobb^ 
in the Barony of Fort, County of Wexford, founded by St 
Domangart Tibbach, in the County of Kilkenny, fonnded 
by St Modomnoc. Sagoabd, in the County of Dublin, 
founded by St Masacra. Fbeshfobd, in the County of Kil« 
kenny, founded by St. Lactan. Killameby in the County 
of Kilkenny, founded by St Gobban. Achad-dagain, 

• A. A. S. S, p. 587. t King p. 93. t Smith p. 75. 



160 

in the County of Waterford, founded by St. Dagan. Sbanb- 
OTHA, in the County of Wexford, founded by St. Colman. — 
TmoHOEy in the Barony of Cullinagh, Queen's County^ 
founded by St. Mochoemoc. Inniskeltra, an island in the 
Shannon, founded by St. Camin. St. Mullins, in the 
County of Carlow, founded by St Moling, Bishop of Ferns. 
Ballyvourney, in the County of Cork, founded by St 
Abban. Cluain-Fikolass, in the County of Cork, founded 
by St Abban. Donaghmore, in the BarOny of Muskerry, 
County Cork, founded by Fingem. Killeagh, in the 
Barony of Imokilly, County Cork, founded by St. Abban. — 
Clondalkik, in the County of Dublin, founded by St. Cro- 
nan Mochua. Killebn, in the County of Meath, founded 
by St Endeus. C)IPB-Clear Island, founded by St. Com- 
gal), a disciple of St Finbarr. Inbhsrdaoile, in the 
County of Wexford, founded by St Dagan. Clonranb, in 
tbe County of Westmeath, founded by St. Mochue. Bally- 
KiNB, in the County of Wicklow, founded by St. Dagan. — 
Muckamorb, in the County of Antrim, founded by St Col- 
man Elo ; this Abbey and its possessions were granted in the 
7th of Elizabeth to Sir Roger Langford.* 

These foundations of the seventh century, together with 
those which had been established in preceding times, formed 
altogether a mass of literary and religious institutions, such 
as, perhaps, no other nation could in that age produce. The 
rules by which they had been governed were extremely r^or- 
ous; and while the monks themselves subsisted either by 
manual or mental labour, their schools were thrown open for 
the gratuitous instruction of all, both natives and foreigners. 
The pages of the next chapter shall be devoted to the biograr 
phy of some of those distinguished men, who at this period 
shed lustre on the religion of their country, and whose names 
have been honourably recorded in the writings of all our 
ancient annalists, 

• Harris lab. 



CHAPTER in. 

Religious and Literary Characters of the Seventh Century — 
General Observations. 

Among the eminent characters, who for learning and sanc- 
tity stood distinguished during the seventh century, may be 
noticed : 

St FintAk Munnu, the celebrated Abbot of Taghmon^ 
This Saint was the son of Tulcan and Feidelmia, both lineally 
descended from Niall of the Nine Hostages, and was born in 
the north of Ireland.* He commenced his studies under St. 
Comgall of Bangor, and afterwards devoted eighteen years to 
the practice of a contemplative life at Cluaninis, then 
governed by the learned and saintly Sinell. At the termi- 
nation of this period, Fintan repaired to the island of Hy, 
with an intention of becoming a member of the Columbian 
Order. The founder, St. Columbkill, had died some short 
time before and was succeeded by Baithen, who received 
Fintan Munnu with great tenderness. ''I thank my God,'* 
says he, '' that you are come to this place, but this you must 
know, that you cannot become a monk of ours." Fintan 
sadly afflicted at these words observed, ^'Is it that I am un-^ 
worthy of being one?" "No," answered Baithen, "but al- 
though I should be very glad to keep you with me, I must 
obey the orders of my predecessor^ Columba; who not long 
since said to me in the spirit of prophecy; 'Baithen, remem- 
ber these words of mine: immediately after my departure 
from this life, a brother who is now regulating his youthful 
^ge by good conduct, and well-versed in sacred studies^ 

* AdaiDDun L. 1. c. 3 



163 

named Fintan, of the race of Mocu-Moiei and son t^aikbtn, 
will come to you from Ireland, and will supplicate to be re- 
ceived among the monks; but it is predetermbed by God, 
that he is t6 be an abbot, presiding over monks and a guide 
of souls. Do not, therefore, let him remain in these islands, 
but direct him to return in peace to Ireland; that he may 
there establish a monastery in a part of Leinster not far from 
the sea, and labour for the good of souls.' ** Fintan accord- 
ingly returned to Ireland^ and proceeded to that part of Hy- 
Kinsellagh now called the County of Wexford.* The east- 
em limits of that territory were in those days enclosed by a 
dreary and desolate forest, on the borders of which the Saint 
erected his Monastery, and was soon accompanied by a con- 
siderable number of disciples. According to Colgan he pre^ 
sided over 234 monks, while other writers of equal credit 
make the number considerably greater. Fintan having 
been well versed in the doctrine of astronomy, as taught in 
those days, took a distinguished part in the controversy which 
the Paschal computation had then created. He was the prin- 
cipal opponent of Laserian in the Synod of Old Leighlin, as 
has been already stated; ^evertheless, he soon after yielded 
to the general opinion, and followed the Dionysian cycle in 
the future celebration of Easter. Archdall, in his catalogue 
of the abbots of Clonenagh, in the Queen's County, has 
placed St. Fintan Munnu among their number, and ranks 
him as a bishop. This, however, is but a mere assertion, and 
is directly opposed to the testimony of Tigemach, Adamnan, 
and other approved writers. St. Fintan following the direc- 
tions which he had received from Baithen, remained during 
his life in the Monastery of Taghmon, and died on the 21st 
of October, A.D. 635. According to Hanmer, he was the 
author of a book on the Paschal controversy, and Dempster 
ascribes to him a treatise on the Acts of St. Columbkill, to- 
gether with a collection of epistles to St. Baithen.f 

* Adamnam L. 1. c. 2. t Tr. Th. p. 470. 



163 

St Colhan-Elo, of the race of the Nialls^ and a native of 
Meathy flourished at the close of the sixth, and in the com* 
menoement of the seventh century* With an intention of 
leading a retired and penitential life he penetrated into the 
most sequestered part of Dalaradia, where he erected the 
Monastery of Muckamore, not far distant from Antrim. In 
this retreat Oolman continued for some years, and having 
qualified himself by the practice of eontinued austerity he 
afterwards became a postulant and embraced the institute of 
St. Columba. Aidus Flan, King of Ireland, held the virtues 
of this Saint in great veneration, and assigned him a tract of 
land in the tenitory of Fercall, now pavt of the King's 
Oounty, in which he was recommended to establish his 
future residence. Colman consented to sojourn in that dis'^ 
trict, but on condition that he himself should be allowed to 
choose the particular place of his abode. The forest of 
FidhrElo,- which occupied a considerable part of that terri- 
tory, was in those days the most dreary and extensive of any 
in the kingdom; from the neighbouring inhabitants it received 
the name of the Black Forest^ while many of its gloomy re- 
cesses had seldom or perhaps never been visited by the foot- 
steps of man. This was the place which Colman had selected, 
and in the heart of this frightful wilderness he spent years 
shut out from human society and devoted to prayer, contem- 
plation, and the rigours of an eremetic life.* Wild fruit and 
herbs with water from the rock composed his repast; the 
cold earth of the forest was his couch, and a stone served 
him for a pillow. Nor was Colman without followers — the 
fame of his sanctity soon spread around — many tired and 
disgusted with the world repaired to this abode of solitude 
and of heavenly peace — numbers embraced it as a sanctuary 
of penance; and thus, in lapse of time, the wilderness 
abounded with the habitations of holy anchorites, while a 

• Life c. 



164 

•pactous monastery was ereded aud received the name of 
Lann^Eloi or the Church of EIo^ now linally, in the King's 
County. According to some authors St. Colman was after-* 
wards consecrated Bishop;* it is, however, certain that he 
continued in his Monastery until the time of his death, which 
occurred in the year 610, and in the fii6lh year of his age« 

St. Ceonan of Roscrea> was a native of the territory of 
Ely O'Carrol, now the King's County .f B^ing deleitnined 
on embracing the religious state, he withdrew to a district of 
Connaught called Puayd, and ftt>m thence to Ctomnacnois, 
where he was soon joined by a number oi disciples^ From 
this place Cfonan repaired to LuAmag, in the present Bafony 
of Gtoycastle, King's County, where he founded a Monas^ 
tery and resided for some time. His next establishment waa 
Sean-ross, neart];ie marsh called Cree, (now Monda,) and 
soon after he erected on a more convenieiit site the celebrated 
Ahbey of Roacrea; which io his days and in after times^ 
was the seat of literature^ an asylum for the poor, and a 
nursery of saints. This Saint was held in great veneration 
by the people of Ely, whom he often protected hy his pray-t 
ers, and among those that came tp receive his instructions 
was Fingen, the martial King of Munster, ahd many of the 
dynasts of that territory. It is recorded in the Acts of St. 
Cronau,! that St Molua, having paid him a visit at the 
Monastery of Sean-ross, requested that he would give him 
the sacrifice or Holy Eucharist, with permission to take it 
with him. To this request Cronan consented, and Molua te^ 
conmiended his Monastery to his prayers and protection. — 
Nor was this a solitary instance of the manner in which thQ 

• Tr, Th. p. 374. t Vil. CroD, 

X " Venit (Molua) ad S. Cronanmn de Bvis-cree, ie4cntem tunc in oci/a Senruis, 
et postulavit ab eo Saerifieium, quod secum portaret ; et dedtt ei Cronanus. Cui 
Lugiditts (Molua) ait: tecum reluquo locum mcum, «t cum a pcraectttoribu» dc- 
fcndas."— Vit. S. Cron. 



165 

blessed Eucharist was sometimes given to holy persons in 
those early times; numerous similar facts stand recorded in 
our ecclesiastical annals, and in the apostolical age it was not 
unusual with holy prelates to send the blessed sacrament to 
each other as a token of brotherly love, and as a mark of 
catholic communion.* * St. Cronan, after a life of labour and 
of great sanctity, died on the 28th of April, A.D. 620. 

St. AsBAN was of the illustrious house of Hua-Cormac^ 
in Iieinster, and nephew of St. Kevin of Glendaloch. His 
first establishment was at Ros-mic-treoin,t or Old Ross, in 
the County of Wexford, where he presided as Abbot about 
the close of the sixth century. His ardent zeal for the sal- 
vation of soulsj and his anxiety to promote monastic dift- 
oiplinCji soon called him fKun his favourite retreat; and he is 
said to have visited a considerable part of Ireland, preaching 
in the towns and villagesj^ forming religious communities, and 
laying the foundations of new establishqaents. Among these 
Teligious institutions^ the following are mentioned by the 
authors of his life: Camross,^ Fion-*magh| I}ruim-4:hain-ceK 
paigh, Maghar-Noidhe, and J>isert-Cheanan, in Hy-Kinse-* 
lagh, County of Wexford | Kill-Abban, in Meath; KilU 
achaid-conchinn, in Kerry; Kill-cruimthir, in the County of 
Cork; Kill-na-marbham, near Michelstown, County Cork| 
Cluain*ard-Mobecoc, in Muskerry, County of Cork ; Cluain-« 
Finglass, in the same County; Ciuain-con-bruin, in the 
pHin of Femin, between Cashel and Clonmel; Kill-Abban, 
in the Coiuity of Louth; three monasteries in the plain of 
Magh-elle, in the County of Gal way; and two nunnerieSj, 
namely, Bomeach, now . Bally vourney, near Macroomp, ii| 
the County of Cork; and Kill-ailbhe, in the County of 
]VIeath, which he committed to the care of St. Sincha.;^ 
This great Saint, after years of difficulties almost insur-p 

• See Eueebius, Hist. £ccl. L. 6w 
t Abban's Life c. 26. Vit. S. Molua, t I4fe c. 26. A. A. S. 9. p. 622. 



166 

mountabley returned to Hy-Kioseli^h, his native country^ 
and founded his last establishment at Maghamoidhe, (Maud^ 
linton) near the site on which the town of Wexford stands.^ 
Here St. Abban spent the remainder of his days in prayer, 
contemplation/ and retirement: he died on the 27th of Octo-* 
ber, and about the year 630. 

St. PuLOHBRius or MocHOBicoCy was of the Nandesii sept 
by his mother Nessa; the name of his father was Beon, a 
natiye of Clonmacne^ in Connaught. He was bom in Hy* 
Conall-Gaura, in the County of Limericky about the year 
560, and when young was placed under the care of St. Com* 
gall of Bangor. Being properly qualified, Mochoemoc re- 
paired from this austere retreat to his own country, and was 
well receired by the Chieflan Ele, (Ely O'Carrol,) who 
offered him his own residence for the purpose of converting 
it into a monastery. This offer the Saint declined, and being 
resolved to shut himself out from the intercourse of men, ,he 
fixed upon a lonesome ^pot in the heart of a forest named 
Laithmore, in the present King's County. f^ Here Mochoe- 
moc spent years of rigorous discipline, and trained up a 
numerous body of disciples in the duties and observance of 
a spiritual life ; many of these eminent men were afterwards 
the founders of other institutions, among whom was the 
celebrated St. Dagan. Several miracles are attributed to St. 
Mochoemoc, and by his sanctity and labours that which 
was once an uninhabited and frightful forest became in the 
course of some years populous and celebrated, and the far- 
famed residence of scholars and saints. St. Mochoemoc 
lived to a gieat age, and died on the 13th of March, A.D. 
666, 

St. Ailbrav, sumamed the Wise, was distinguished for 
his learning and various writings, and is generally supposed 
to be the Priest Airendanus, mentioned in the third class of 

<» Archdall Addend», &c. f life c. 16. 



167 

Irish saints. He presided for many years as chief professor 
over the School of Clonard, where he composed a life of St. 
Patriekj also the acts of St. Fechin of Fore; a treatise on 
the virtues of St. Brigid, and an allegorical exposition of the 
genealogy of Christ, which has been published among the 
Collectanea Sacra of Fleming.* Sedulius in his notes on the 
Gospel of St. Matthew has given insertion to this tract, to 
which he has prefixed the following complimentary scholium. 
''Here begins the typocal and tropological knowledge of 
Christ, explained by St. Ailetan, the wisest of the Scottish 
nation.'^ When very old he published his three books "cfo 
mirabilibus Sacrce Scriptur€B;*^ forming a learned abridge- 
ment of the history of the Bible, intermixed with a variety of 
theological and philosophical disquisitions, tending to eluci- 
date the difficulties that may occur.f The first book contains 
that part of Sacred history recorded in the Pentateuch — 
the second comprises the remainder of the Bible — and in the 
third, the events of the New Testament are substantially 
epitomized. The time of St. Aileran's death is not recorded, 
but was most probably about the year 640. 

St. Munchen or Makchen, surnamed the wise, was a 
descendant of Cormac Cas, King of Munster, and for learning 
and sanctity was held in great veneration throughout the ter- 
ritory of Thomond.j: It is, indeed, a difficult task, to recon- 
cile the various opinions which have been advanced relative 
to the ecclesiastical rank of this eminent Saint. According 
to Ware, he was the first bishop who presided over the See 
of Limerick; while others with more probability, rank him 
among the abbots of Mene-drochit (now Mundrehid) in the 
present barony of Upper Ossory. The former opinion is 
grounded on a geneological hagiology in which five ecclesias- 
tics of that name are mentioned. Nevertheless in all our 
ancient calendars, the title of bishop cannot be found annexed 

• Bib. Pat. T. 12. f A. A. S. S. p. 1 40. J Id. p. 332. 



168 

to them. It may likewise be proper to remark, that the 
name of any one of his successors has not been ascertained, 
nor is there mention made of any future bishop in the See of 
Limerick, until the time of Gillbert, at the commencement 
of the twelfth century.* St, Munchen was certainly the 
founder of several religious houses, and having been exceed- 
ingly venerated for his learning, as well as for his sanctity, it 
is highly probable that several churches had been dedicated 
to his memory in the district of Thomond; among which the 
church in Limerick was particularly distinguished. O'Hal- 
laran represents Munchen as Bishop of Limerick, and actu- 
ally oflSciating there soon after the arrival of St. Patrick in 
Ireland; and asserts, moreover, that he had been the founder 
and first Abbot of the Monastery of Muingharid (Mungret) 
near Limerick.f This, however, is a mere unauthorized 
assertion, repugnant to historical evidence, and ^involving a 
downright palpable anachronism. In St. Patrick's time, 
there was neither a town or a Monastery in the place where 
the City of Limerick now stands, and as to the Abbey of 
Mungret, all our ancient annals mention St. Nessan as its first 
Abbot, about the middle of the sixth century. St. Munchen 
died on the 2nd of January, A. D. 652. j: 

CuMMiAN, the author of the celebrated paschal epistle 
to Segenius, Abbot of Hy, was a native of Leath-Mogha or 
southern half of Ireland, and received his education in the 
Monastery of Durrogh. This learned writer was a member of 
the Columbian institute, and at the time in which that 
Paschal treatise was published, he appears to have been sta- 
tioned in the Monastery of Disart-chuimin^ now Kilcummin, 
in the King's County .§ The proceedings of the Synod of 
Leighlin, in which the Roman cycle had been received, met 
with a firm supporter in the person of this eminent man. He 

• See Cent. 12. c. 2. t Hist. B. 8. c. 7. 

t Annals of Ulster^Usher, Ind. Chron. § A. A. S. S. p. 408. 



prevailed on his brethren in Darrogh to enter into Jiig views on 
Che subject, and at length succeeded in making it the stand- 
ing rule of all the Columbian establishments in that part of 
Ireland. This interference called forth various remonstrances 
from the Abbot of H}r> and from the heads of other houses; 
on which occasion Cummian composed a treatise replete with 
learning and deep research, which he addressed in the shape 
of an epistle to Segenius and the rest of his brethren both in 
Ireland and the Hebrides* He commences this work by de- 
claring that he had not given any decisive opiiuon on that sub- 
ject, without having previously prepared himself by long and 
intense study. He then adduces a copious collection of pas- 
sages from Sacred Writ, a variety of facts from ecclesiastical 
liistory, and a number of quotations from the Fathers, both 
Greek and Latin, and particularly from Origin, St. Cyprian, 
St. Augustin, SU Jerome, St. Cyril of Alexandria and St. 
Gregory the Great. The inquiry which he has made into the 
various cycles of the Jews, Greeks, Latins and Egyptians, 
and the precision with which he has analyzed and reviewed 
the several systems of this intricate computation, prove him to 
have been a man of immense research and a profound scientific 
scholar. He sums up. all by an appeal to the authority and 
Unity of the Church, and thus concludes** ''Can any thing 
be perceived more pernicious to the mother church, more de^ 
structive to religion, or more unjustifiably absurd than to say, 
Rome errs, Jerusalem errs, Alexandria errs, Antioch errs, the 
whole world en*s, the Scots and Britons alone are right?" 
Notwithstanding the solid erudition and powerful reasoning 
embodied in this work, the Columbian Fathers still tena- 
ciously adhered to the ancient Paschal system, nor was the 
Alexandrine or Dionysian rule allowed to be introduced intp 
their establishments in Ulster until .the visitation of the 
learned Adamnan in the eighth century. Cammian was like* 
wise the author of other valuable works, among which should 

• Pwrh. Ep. p. 10. 

T 



170 

be noticed his inaSt entitled, **D4 Paniieniidrum mensura,'' 
a learned Epitome of the ancient penitential canons^ Tbia 
treatise was afterwards found in the Monastery of St. Gall, 
with the name of the Abbot Cummian of Scotia or Ireland 
prefixed* It was published by Sirin^ and re-published in the 
edition of the BMiotheea Patrum at Lyons in 1677. To this 
day it remains a valuable document of antiquity; proying 
beyond question^ the divine institution of saeremental Con« 
fession with the penances enjoined — the sacrifice of the 
Mass — sprayers for the dead — Celibacy of the clergy, and 
. many other points of faith and discipline which the Catholic 
Church always did and ever will continue to hold. Cummian 
died on the 2nd of December, A. D* 662. 

St. Fbchik of Pore was lineally descended from the oele* 
brated Con of the hundred battles, and was bom in the 
barony of Leney in the County of Sligo."*^ Having completed 
his studies under St Nathi of Achonry and being raised to 
the priesthood Fechin retired to a place called Fobhar now 
Fore, in the County of Westmeath. Notwithstanding the 
progress which the Oospel had already made over Ireland, 
some remnants of pagan immorality had still been suffered to 
remain in this sequestered territory. An anxious desire to re- 
form these people was the principal motive which induced the 
Saint to proceed amongst them. Assisted by a few disciples 
he soon founded a religious establishment, and by his preachr 
ing and example the inhabitants were speedily reclaimed, 
while many of them became strict followers of his institute. 
The Saint and his community met at first with much opposi- 
tion and were reduced to the greatest distress, but were 
relieved by the generosity of Guaire King of Connangfat and 
other neighbouring benefactors. Fechin had great influence 
with the kings and princes of his time, of which he made 
frequent use either in reconciling the disputes of contaKling 
parties or in relieving the distressed. When Domtiald II, 

* A.A,S.S.p.l43. 



171 

King of Ireland y had marched at the head of a powerful army 
into the country of the Boutfaem Nialld, for the purjiose of 
marking the limits of their territoiy> the inhabitants dreading 
the probable consequences applied to the Saint, and by hift 
mediation Domnald was prevailed upon to desist from hii 
undertakmg, and became reconciled to these southern tributary 
clans.* Solitude was that in which the Saint felt particular 
delight, while his life was one continued seri^ of the most 
rigorous penance. He was the founder of several other mon« 
asteries, among which were Cong in the County of Mayo and 
Immagh on the coast of Oalway. St Fechin died on the 
20th of January, A. D. 665, of the pestilence which then 
raged all over Ireland. Fore was called Baile»Leabhair,t or 
the town of books, and its Schools were held in the highest 
reputation. Some of its abbots were bishops, but it does not 
appear to have been at any period a regular episcopal see.;]: 

Having now presented to the reader a general outline of the 
leading historical events of the seventh century, the first fact 
which must strike our attention is that of the Paschal contn>- 
versy; and although it be in itself a mere question of discip* 
line, yet considered in its consequences, it becomes a matter 
of high importance and pregnant with the most interesting 
results. In the infancy of the Church of Ireland, the time 
for celebrating the Paschal solemnity was determined by a 
method of calculation introduced by St Patrick and handed 
down by our forefathers with great reverence and care from 
one generation to another. After the lapse of about two cen- 
turies an attempt was made for the first time to alter this 
ancient disciplinary usage; a new rule or mode of solution 
wad proposed; nothing more than discipline was contemplated, 
and yet on its very introduction, both cletgy and laity rose up 
and reclaimed against it; nor would they consent to receive 
even this Paschal system until they had been convinced that 
no infringement on Catholic doctrine was intended, and that 

• Life, c. 34. t Usher, p. 966. t See Century ^iii. c. 2. 



172 

the unity of a public rite absolutely required their unanimous 
adhesion. But what, ive may ask^ would have been the eon* 
sequence should any doctrinal innovation have been at- 
tempted? This indeed would be accompanied by a reclama* 
tion and a resistance too loud to be suppressed— too powerful 
to be subdued. Again, history has furnished us with an ac* 
curate and a complete detail of all the circumstances con* 
nected with this ancient controversy of the Paschal compu- 
tation. We know that the new or Alexandrian cycle was 
introduced mto Ireland in the seventh century — we know the 
persons by whom it was introduced — ^the causes of its intro^ 
dttction — the disputations which it occasioned— the meetings 
and the synods in which it was discussed—- *in short, we are 
acquainted with its whole history. Such being the undoubted 
fact, it is most certam, that had any attempt been made to in* 
troduce novel points of belief or to corrupt the ancient faith 
of Ireland, the same medium of history would have trans- 
mitted to us a full and faithful account of so public and mo* 
mentous an event. Now, if this reasoning, this language of 
common sense holds good vrith respect to Ireland, most 
assuredly it acquires additional weight when applied to the 
Universal Church of Christ; and hence it is, that although it 
has often been asked, when, where or by whom had any doc- 
trinal error been introduced into the Church, the question 
though repeated has never yet been answered. But the dis- 
cussion of the Paschal cycle has been attended with other 
beneficial effects. It has brought forth some able productions 
from the great men of those ancient times — ^from the founders 
of the Irish Church, and by means of which we become at 
once acquainted with the belief of our forefathers in those 
days. An abundance of similar evidence could be produced 
in every age; while, we repeat it, the great argument of pre- 
scription — that test of truth and end of religious controversy — 
acquires additional force from the events and discussions of 
the Church of Ireland during the seventh century. 



173 

The high character which in those days our country main- 
tained for learning, holiness and hospitality^ is another &ct 
well worthy the attention of the reader. Bede and other 
ancient writers testify that the literature and religious spirit 
of the Irish people became in this age proverbial; and men 
from all nations visited our chores in quest of science and 
the knowledge of heavenly truth. Among this number we 
find crowds of Britons, who being almost destitute of educa- 
tion at home were glad to come and receive it gratuitously in 
Ireland* The acts of many of these eminent men have been 
honourably recorded in our annals; and while we appreciate 
the labours of Hewald in Saxony, and of Egbert^ Willibrord, 
Vickberet and others in Friesland, let it not be forgotten that 
Ireland was the nursery in which these distbguished Britons 
had been educated and qualified for the arduous duties of 
those interesting missions. In after times> when the sword was 
drawn and Ireland had to pass through the crucible — when by 
despotic enactments and the terrors of the gibbet, the Irish 
fitudent shut out from the chance of education in his own 
country was compelled to take refuge in a foreign, land; 
France, the Netherlands, Spain, Italy — all embraced the 
exiled Irish ecclesiastic — ^felt for his wrongs — sheltered him 
from his oppressors, and gave him education^ freely and mu*- 
nificently, as his forefathers had once done towards strangers 
firom the most distant parts of Eurppe. 

The inestimable labours of St. Aidan, the Apostle of Nor* 
thumberland, and the equally eventful missions of Finan and 
Golman, his successors, would supply matter for still more 
ample commentary; these missions, however, in conjunction 
with others, shall form the heads of a distinct subject and 
shall in their proper place be again presented to the reader^ 
consideration. 



EIGHTH CENTURY. 

CHAPTER I. 

Termination of the Paschal Controversy— Question on the 
subject of the Tonsure decided — Religious Spirit of the 
Irish in this age — The Monarch Flahertach-Turlough, 
Prince of Thomond — The Inhabitants of Iceland and of 
the Orkneys converted by Irishmen — Progress of our 
Missionaries in various parts of Europe — History of St. 
Virgilius — of St. Mumold — of Clemens and AUnnus — the 
Ostmen or Danes make their first appearance on the Coast 
of Ireland. 

From the historical events of the preening centuries the 
titate of the Irish Church at this period may be readily col« 
lected. Its hierarchy had been organized — ^the episcopal sees 
of the present day were, with few eacceptions, founded — while 
the ecclesiastical'orders were composed of men, professions- 
ally learned, zealous, and abore all,- disengaged from the 
wealth and pleasures of this world. Meanwhile the literary 
retreats of the sixth and seventh centuries were as usual fre- 
quented by foreigners, and were conducted on a scale more 
ample and splendid than ever. For this reason it is, that iti 
the eighth century very few schools of an extensive description 
had been founded; the ancient establishments were consi- 
dered sufficient, and hence the arrangement of this chapter 
shall, in this respect, vary from that of some of the pre^ 
ceding ones. 

The controversy relative to the Paschal cycle gave rise to 
considerable discussion during the last century; principles 
had been advanced on both sides of the question, the result 



175 

of ivhich waa, that in the south of Ireland the Roman Pas-' 
chal computation had been adopted, while in the north to^ 
gether with a great portion of Leinster and Connaught, the 
ancient Irish cycle was still retained. This discrepancy, al* 
though it could not affect catholic faith, was neyertheless, a 
floating spedk upon the bright surface of the Church of Ire* 
land. To remove it, was a task undertaken by many but ex- 
ecuted by none; one obstacle havmg been put out of the 
way, served only to make room for another; it was con- 
sidered by some as a work insurmountable, to all it appeared 
extremely di£Scult, and it was at length accomplished by 
Adamnan, the learned Abbot of Hy, about the year 703. — 
It happened that Adamnan had in the year 702 been deputed 
by his countrymen to proceed to Alfrid, King of Northum- 
berland, during which visit he became acquainted with the 
Abbot Ceolfrid and with several other eminent persons, who 
felt a desire to see this question amicably decided. Adam** 
nan being a man of great experience and lamenting the 
conflict of opinion which this controversy had occasioned, 
listened with attention to the arguments of these ecclesiastics; 
his former views on the subject were soon withdrawn ; all 
these he was willing to sacrifice on the common altar of 
unity, and he at length consented to adopt the Roman, or 
rather the Alexandrian cycle, with the Eusebian revision and 
amendments. Adamnan promised, moreover, to use his in- 
fluence in having it received as the permanent and exclusive 
calculation of the Pasch throughout the north of Ireland; in 
which undertaking he finally but with difficulty succeeded. — 
In the year afler, about 703, he sailed for Ireland, and hav- 
ing reached the north, this great man did all in his power by 
authority and argument to bring over his countrymen to the 
opinion which he had already formea on this then interesting 
subject.* His principal arguments referred to the source 

•BeieL. 6. c. 16. 



176 

from vih\c\k this disciplinary usage had emanated-^io Ob 
universality, it being now the universally received rule of dis-* 
cipline over the Christian world — and to the important con- 
nection which subsisted between it and the other leading 
festivals of the year. The influence which Adamnan's learn- 
ing and sanctity had gained throughout the north added con^ 
siderable weight to his arguments; accordingly the prelates^ 
together with the heads of the leading monasteries almost 
instantaneously adopted the Roman method of calculation, 
and thus the same rule of discipline appertaining to the Pas- 
chal festival was observed in every province and in every 
diocess in Ireland. Adamnan remained in this country until 
after the Easter of 704, which he celebrated at the time pre- 
scribed by the Roman cycle, and then returned to his 
Monastery in the island of Hy. 

About this period the question of the clerical tonsure was 
likewise decided. It is certain, that until some time in the 
fifth century, there was no peculiar tonsure in use among 
the clergy. The practice of it originated, most probably, 
with some monks chiefly of the east, who, as a token of re- 
pentance, generally appeared with their heads shaved.* The 
Greek monks were accustomed to shave the whole head; and 
hence Julian the Apostate, who in the reign of Ck)n8tantine 
pretended to be a monk, had his hair shorn according to the 
monastic custom of that country. In other parts of the east 
they had their heads only half shaved, something similar to 
that practised by the first and second class of the Irish saints. 
The eastern tonsure gradually passed from the monks to the 
secular clergy; but in the western Church there was no cer- 
tain or determined form prescribed until after the close of the 
fifth century .t The difference between the Irish tonsure and 
that used by the Romans, since the time of Gregory the 
Great, consisted in this, that with the Romans the crown of 

• Biogham Grig. B. 7. f Smith's Appendix to Bede. 



177 

the head was shorn in form of a circle, while the Irish 
shaved only the fore-part of the head, permitting the hair 
to fall behind. The surrounding circle of hair in the Roman 
tonsure was, strictly speaking, called the coroTia; and in 
its mystical signification was supposed to represent the crown 
of thorns which had been placed on the sacred head of the 
Redeemer. It is also considered as an embtem of the royalty 
of the Christian priesthood.* There is no doubt but the 
Irish tonsuife was that which the clergy of this country had 
in the fifth century received from St. Patrick; nor was it in 
reality confined to Ireland; the semicircular tonsure (as it 
was called) had at that period been used in several parts of 
the east, and generally speaking throughout the west. St. 
Paulinus of Nola, who was a native of Gaul and who died 
in the commencement of the fifth century^ speaking of the 
monks of his time, says, they were half tonsured, having 
the fore-parts of their heads shaved : " Semitonsi et destituta 
fronte pr€Brasi."f The fact is, St. Patrick had found this 
form of tonsure used in CJaul and in other places, and hav- 
ing taught it to the Irish, it was afterwards observed with 
that scrupulous reverence which our forefathers always paid 
to every thing delivered to them by that great Apostle. At 
all events the controversy to which it gave rise continued for 
a long period; it was conducted with much argumentation 
between our Irish missionaries in Northumberland and the 
English clergy; but from the time in which the new cycle 
had been generally received in Ireland, this question of the 
tonsure was no longer discussed, and wherever the Roman 
Paschal system had been adopted, that of the tonsure was 
received along with it. It affords, however, another con- 
vincing proof of the moral impossibility of introducing any 
new dogma, or of corrupting the faith which had been 
preached and triumphantly planted in Ireland. 

* Bellarmin L. 2. de Monachls* f £p. 7, 

Z 



178 

The precepts and maxims of the Gospel produced in this 
century a striking effect on the minds and actions not only 
of the people in general, but also of the princes and rulers 
of the land. Several of our kings and dynasts, disgusted 
with the vanities of the world, retired altogether from the 
'dangerous scenes of life and embraced the solitude and aus- 
terities of the cloister. Flahertach, Monarch of Ireland, 
having conquered and slain in battle Kineth, a descendant 
of Diermit II., resigned his crown and kingdom in 734 and 
spent several years of great mortification in the monastery of 
Armagh.* During the incumbency of St. Colman, Abbot 
and Bishop of Lismore, Theodoric or Turlough, King of Tho* 
mond, after renouncing the splendour of the world, repaired 
to that Monastery and received the religious habit from the 
hands of that Saint. Theodoric was the son of Cathal and 
grandson of Aldus Coemh, King of Munster.f He governed 
his kingdom with great glory for many years and had seve- 
ral children, among whom was the celebrated St. Flannan of 
Killaloe* At the time in^ which Theodoric entered the estab- 
lishment of Lismore, he had nearly reached the 75th year of 
his age; nevertheless, the austerities which he voluntarily un- 
derwent were almost incredible, and it is related that he em- 
ployed himself for a considerable time in breaking rocks and 
making a convenient road to the monastery. This pious 
prince died in Thomond and was buried in the Church of 
Killaloe,j: of which his son St. Flannan had been the 
founder. 

After the death of Adamnan the monks of the Monastery 
of Hy continued as attached as ever to the Irish Paschal 
system, until about the year 716, when Egbert^ a holy priest 
who had received his education in Ireland and was at the 
time undertaking a mission to Friesland, had paid a visit to 

• OTlahcrty Ogyg. p. 3. t M. c. 83, t Ware's Antiq. c. 29. 



179 

that establishment. Dunchad, grandson of Conall,* was at 
that time superior of Hy and in fact of the whole Colum- 
bian Order. He paid great attention to the arguments of 
Egbert and was ultimately induced to receive the Roman 
Paschal cycle, together with the circular tonsure. On this 
subject Prideaux writes: ''In the year 716, a pious and 
learned presbyter of the English nation, after having spent 
many years completing his studies in Ireland, which at that 
period was the prime seat of learning in all Christendom, 
coming from thence to the Monastery of Hy, proposed to 
that community the Roman Paschal system and having bet- 
ter success hereia than Adamnan, be brought them all over 
to it."t 

This century is marked by our annalists as the period in 
which our Irish missionaries established a knowledge of the 
Christian religion in Iceland, which island was known to 
them by the name of Thule, or Inis-Thyle. Amgrim Jonas, 
the Icelandic historian, attempts to maintain that Iceland 
was not inhabited until the landing of the Norwegians in 874. 
This, however, is a mere assertion, while the same writer is 
obliged to admit that the Norwegians had on their arrival in 
the island found some sacred utensils which had been left 
there by Irish Christians. "These men," lie observes, "the 
ancient Icelanders called Pap(zs, a name which, in the minds 
of the Northerns, singified Clergymen.*' That Iceland was 
inhabited prior to the period mentioned by Jonils and that 
Irish missioners had resided there must appear evident from 
the testimony of Ara Multiseius, and other Icelandic writers. 
These state that when Ingolf the Norwegian had landed in 
Iceland, the country was in a great part covered with forests, 



* For about 200 yean after the foundation of the great Monastery of Hy, almost 
all its abbots were descendants of Conall Gulbanius, a branch of the northern 
Nialls, and consequently claimed relationship to St« Columbiull. 

t Connect, p. 2. 



180 

and Multiseius adds^ 'Hhat there were Christians in it, whom 
the Norwegians called Papas, and that they afterwards 
quitted the country because they did not wish to live with 
heathens; that they, moreover, had left behind them Irish 
books, bells, and staffs : thence it is easy to conclude that 
they had been Irishmen/' The same circumstances are men- 
tioned in the book called Laud-Nama-boc, in which we read, 
^' Before Iceland was inhabited by the Norwegians, there had 
been men there whom these Northerns called Papas, who 
professed the Christian religion and are considered to have 
come by sea from the west ; for there were left by them Irish 
books, bells, and crooked staffs; several other things were 
discovered which seemed to indicate that they had beoi west^ 
men. These articles were found in Papeya towards the east 
of the island, and in Papyli."* The probability, therefore, 
is that on the arrival of the Norwegians, who besides being 
invaders were, moreover, infidels, a most violent persecution 
had been raised against the Christians, and this may account 
for the books, staffs, and sacred utensils, which had been 
found in the island after their departure. In these Northern 
islands, and particularly in the Orkneys, are to be found a 
great number of remarkable ruins, which serve to point out 
the ancient state of religion in those places and bear strong 
marks of having been clerical or monastic property. It is, 
therefore, an undoubted fact, that Irishmen had extended 
their missions as far northward as Iceland, and this very pro- 
bably anterior even to the eighth century ,+ There is still 
stronger authority for maintaining that the Orkneys and the 
Shetland Isles were indebted to our forefathers for the first 
knowledge of the Gospel. In truth, our Irish missionaries 

* Johnston Aut. celto-Scand. 

i Bicuil mentions that he had convened with several Irish priests who bad been 
stationed in Iceland. From his account it would appear that these missioners, aft«r 
having remained for a certain time in the island, were called home and immediately 
relieved by others. ^ 



181 

preached in these islands as early as the times of St. Columb- 
kill ; and Dicuil who flourished at the close of the eighth cen- 
tury states, that in the Hetblandic, that is, the Shetland 
Isles, Irish hermits were living since about one hundred years 
prior to the time in which he had written** 

The character of this century for distinguished Irish mis*- 
sionaries equals, if not surpasses that of preceding times. — 
Among these apostolical men St. Viroilius Bishop of Saltz- 
burgh has justly obtained an high rank. His proper name 
was Feargil, and while it is uncertain to what particular 
family he belonged, there is no doubt of his having been of 
high extraction.t About the year 746 he repaired to Frai^ce^ 
where he was well received by Pepin, who had afterwards 
been, raised to the throne of that realm4 Vilnius soon 
after proceeded to Bavaria, and was favoured by Pepin with 
a letter of introduction to the Duke Otilo by whom the 
government of that territory was then held. Here the learn- 
ing and unceasing labours of Virgilius rendered his name 
celebrated and the assistance afforded by the Duke gave ad- 
ditional effect to the success of his mission. St. Boniface^ 
Archbishop of Mentz^ was contemporary with Virgilius and 
enjoyed at the time jurisdiction over Bavaria as well as over 
many other parts of Germany. During the incumbency of 
Boniface a circumstance occurred which might have proved 
troublesome to Virgilius, had not his superior knowledge 
both of theology and of philosophy enabled him to justify 
the opinions which he held and the practice which he recom- 
mended. It happened that some priest in Virgilius' district, 
not having been well versed in latin, had administered the 
sacrament of baptism with this form: ^'Baptizo te in nomine 
Patria et Filia et Spiritua Sancta." Boniface maintained 
that such baptisms were invalid, and ordered Virgilius to re- 
baptize these persons. Virgilius on the other hand, justly 

* Usher p. 729. 868. f Messingham, Florilegium. t Mabillon Acta. Ben. 



182 

defended the validity of the baptisms^ and refusing to com- 
ply with the orders of Boniface was at length obliged to ad- 
dress a letter to Pope Zachary. This correspondence termi- 
nated in an admonitory epistle from the Pope to Boniface, in 
which he tells him that his orders had been indiscreet, and 
that although the latin used by the priest had not been cor- 
rect, yet it did not by any means invalidate the sacra- 
ment, and that consequently the persons should not be re- 



While Virgilius had been completing his education in Ire- 
land, he is said to have paid particular attention to the study 
of astronomy, His superior scientific knowledge often in- 
clined him to discant on the prevailing astronomical doctrines 
pf the day with great fteedom and candour, and especially 
pn that relative to the antipodes. Espousing the system 
which he had been taught in his own country Virgilius de- 
fended the sphericity of the earth, and from thence deduced 
corollaries and scholiums which proved by no means agree- 
able to the taste or opinion of those who still adhered to the 
once admired but now exploded hypothesis of the old school. 
Among those who considered the theory of Virgilius as false 
and worse than eccentric was the good Boniface, Nor is 
the epithet when coupled with the name of Boniface misap- 
plied; that Prelate was a good and a great man, but fol- 
lowing the astronomical elements of the age in which he 
lived he felt sincerely convinced that Virgilius was wrong, 
and that his principles and bis antipodes should be denounced 
as extravagant and mischievous. Accordingly Boniface sent 
a communieation to Rome, and among other things accused 
Virgilius with having maintained, that there were other men 
living under the earth and inhabiting a world altogether dis- 
tinct from this. It is not surprising that Zachary should 
consider this doctrine both novel and dangerous^ and hence 

* Uther Ep. Hib. Syl. No. 16. 



183 

in his reply be is made to say that ''in case it be proved that 
Virgilius had held the doctrine of their being another world, 
and oth^ men under the earth, a synod should be convened 
and he should be expelled the Church/'* Virgilius, how- 
ever, having submitted a correct explanation of his opinion 
to Zachary, was pronounced orthodox, and a perfect re- 
conciliation was thus happily effected. 

About the year 748 Virgilius was appointed Abbot of the 
Monastery of St. Peter at Saltzburgh; and in 756 he was 
appointed Bishop of that City by Pope Stephen XL, Pepin 
having been at the time King of Franccf Virgilius con- 
sidered himself unworthy to be raised to this exalted dignity 
and continued for two years in his refusal, until at length 
being prevailed upon by the Bishops of the province and by 
the clergy and people, he submitted to the appointment. — 
The accounts which German writers give us of the zeal and 
labours of Vii^ilius after his consecration bespeak the vigi- 
lance of the prelate and the sanctity of the saint. He con- 
secrated a Basilic in that city in honour of St. Stephen, be- 
sides the celebrated Abbey of Ottinga which he founded. — 
Virgilius also repaired the monastery in which he had been 
Abbot, and enlarged the Abbey of St Maximilian and other 
establishments. His great and chief work was the Basilic 
which he founded and dedicated in the name of St. Rupert, 
and ^fler having translated there the remains of the Saint, 
he constituted it the Cathedral. Karastus the Sclavonian 
Duke of Carinthia and Chetimar his cousin were both con- 
verted and baptized by Virgilius; and from the interest which 
the saint took in the welfare of the Carinthian Church and the 
number of missionaries with which he had supplied it, he was 
always considered and is justly styled its Apostle. After a 
most useful and holy life, Virgilius died at Saltzburgh on the 

« Usher Syl. N. 17. t Mabillon Anna]. 



184 

27th of November, A.D. 786.* A discourse on the anti- 
podes and several other tracts are attributed to him^t and 
he is to this day held in the highest veneration as Patron of 
Saltzburgh and Apostle of Carinthia. 

St. RuHOLDy the illustrious Apostle of Mechlin, flourished 
about the middle of the eighth century. According to the 
Lateran breviary and chronicles of the Church of Mechlin, 
**he was of the royal house of Ireland and by right of suc- 
cession heir to a throne." After having embraced the eccle- 
siastical state, his talents and sanctity had soon become con- 
spicuous and he was raised to the episcopacy. Some virriters 
have maintained that he had presided over the See of Dublin; 
this opinion, however, cannot be easily reconciled with the 
authenticated records of that Church.J Rumold, inflamed 
with a desire to visit the tombs of the Apostles, repaired to 
Rome, and here it is said he was admonished in a vision to 
direct his course back to the West.^ Accordingly after hav- 
ing obtained the Pope's benediction, he proceeded to Mechlin, 
where he was received in a manner the most flattering by the 
Count Ado. This Count was a great patron of Rumold, and 
having received several favours through the prayers of the 
Saint, he in gratitude presented him with a tract of ground 
called UlmuSf on which an extensive Monastery was soon 
erected. From this establishment St. Rumold supplied that 
and the neighbouring districts with missionaries, and so in- 
defatigable was he in preaching the Gospel not only at 
Mechlin but through the adjacent country, that he has been 



* He is named by the German writers " a man the most learned among the 
learned." Alcuin in his encomiums on St. Virgilius has these lines : 

Egregius prtesul meritis et moribus albas, 
Protulit in lucem quem mater Hibemia, 
Instituit, docuit, nutrivit, 

Sed peregrina petens. 

Vir piuset prudens, nuUi pietate secundus. 

t Ware, Writers. % See cent, xi. c. 1. $ Brev. Lat. 



186 

jtistly styled the Apostte of the Mechliniatas. Nbtwithstandt- 
ing the great services &nd amiable disposition of the Saint, 
two adsai^ins, whom he had reph>ved for their immt^ralityy 
(conspire and put him to death on the 24th of Jtin^, A. D. 
775.* The remams of St; RumoM were interred in the Ohtirch 
at Ulmiis but were afterwards translated by Count Ado to 
tile Cathedtal and Metrojiolitan Church of Mechlin^ wher^ 
they were deposited in a silver shrine^ and it is stated that 
several miracles had been wrought at his tomfo.f 

About the same period two justly celebrated Irishmen, 
Albinus and ClbmbkS, arrived in France; Charlemagne 
being at the time sole Sovereign of the whole French Mon^- 
archy. These men, if riot the revivers 6f literature in France 
and Italy, were at leant mo&t powerfully instrumental in dif- 
fusing through these countries a knowledge of philosophy and 
of the science^, which had certainly buffered decay from the in- 
cursions of the Northern barbarians and the revolutions by 
which they were accompanied. The reception which they met 
^ith from Charlemagne and the history of their subsequent 
transactions are faithfully recorded by a writer of the ninth 
tentufy, whom Usher supposed to be the learned Notker 
Ball)ulus, a monk of the Abbey of St. Gall in Switzerland*. 
The author, in his history of Charlemagne, has the following 
tiarratiVe.^: "When the illustrious Charles began to reign 
alone in the western parts of the world, and literature was 
every where almost forgotten, it happened that two Scots df 
Ireland came over with some British merchants to the shores 
of France; men incomparably skilled in human learning and 
in the holy Scriptures. As they produced no merchandise for 

* In the Belgic life written about this period and translated by Domyns, the 
year in which St. Ruinold suffered is marked by the equtal letters cotilaiDed in the 
following line. 

"hIC CossVs CaCIdIt fLUVIo laCtVs rieCe Capta." 
t Vita ap J, Domyns. } De gestis Caroli, Caniaii Antiq. — Ware Writers 

2a 



186 

sale, they used to cry out to the crowds flocking to purchase; 
If am/ one is desiraus far wisdom, Ut him cams to y$ and ra- 
eeivs it; far tse have it to seU* Their reason for saying that 
they had it for sale was, that perceiving the people inclined 
to deal in saleable articles and not to take anything gra* 
tuitOQsly, they might rouse them to the acquisition of wisdom 
as well as of objects for which they should gire ralue; or, as 
the sequel shewed, that by speaking in that manner they 
might excite their wonder and astonishment They repeated 
this declaration so often, that an account of them was eon- 
yeyed to the King, who, bebg a great admirer of wisdom, 
had them conducted with all expedition before him. He 
asked them, if they truly possessed wisdom, as had been re- 
ported to him? They answeted, that they did, and were 
ready in the name of the Lord to communicate it to such as 
would seek it worthily. On his inquiring of them what com- 
pensation they would expect for it? They replied, that they 
required nothing more than convenient situations, ingenious 
minds, and, as being in a foreign country, to be supplied with 
food and raiment Charles, having heard their proposals 
and replete with joy, kept them both with himself for a short 
time. After some interval, when obliged to proceed on a 
military expedition, he ordered one of them, whose name was 
Clemens, to remain in France; intrusting to his care a great 
number of boys, not only of the highest noblesse but like- 
wise of the middling and lower ranks of society; all of whom 
were, by his orders, provided with food and a suitable habita- 
tion. The other, by name Albinus, he directed to Italy and 
assigned to him the Monastery of St Augustin near Pavia,"*^ 
that such persons as wished for knowledge might there resort 
to him." 

* Thit celebrated Monastery was origiaally dedicated to St. Peter. It after* 
wards obtaibed tbe title of tbe Abbey of Su Auguttin, in consequence of its con- 
taining the remains of the illustrious Bishop of Hippo. Maratori states, that Al- 
binus, after havbg received the grant of it, became a member of the Benedictine 
institute. 



187 

While these eminent men had been at the court of Charle- 
magne, that great patron of literature was highly pleased 
with their conversation, and conceiring that knowledge dif- 
fused among his-subjects was likely to form the surest basis of 
his rising dominion, he wisely resolved to turn the fortunate 
anival o^ these valuable strangers into a source of both indi- 
vidual and national advantage^ Vincentius Betlovacensis 
and* other writers state, that Clemens, following the directions 
of his patron^ kept his school in Paris; while others assuming 
an hypothesis no less groundless than improbable maintain 
that he had been the founder of its University* That Paris 
had been the place appointed for Clemens may be readily ad- 
mitted, although it is certain that Charlemagne had not 
usually kept his court in that City; but without a glaring 
anachronism it cannot be said that he was the founder of its 
University; no such establishment having been known in 
Paris until about the dose of the eleventh century.* Clemens 
continued to teach after the death of Charlemagne, and 
besides his grammatical and other tracts he is said to have 
written a history of the reign of that Monarch.f Albinns is 
described by Muratori and others as the Father and reviver of 
learning in Pavia.;]: That literature had at this time been de- 
plorably neglected throughout Lombardy is but the natural 
result of long contested wars and incessant revolutionary vicis- 
situdes. For more than two centuries that fine country had 
been rent and distracted; the fury of the Ooth having been 
allayed only made way for the vengeance of the Lombard-^ 
one horde of barbarians was followed by another still more 
unsparing and formidable; while social improvement and the 
cultivation of letters were generally abandoned and nearly 
lost amidst the terror of arms and the constant struggle of an 
enterprising, unsettled and desperate people. Lombardy, 
however, had about this time been brought under the domin- 

* Encyclopedie at Univenritc. t Usher, pre. £p. Ilib. t Aimali at 781. 



188 

ion of Charlemagne, and among the many other benevolent 
qualities of that great Monarchy his zeal for prompting peace 
and for disusing knowledge among his subjects w&s not the 
least conspicuous. As the foundation of the University of 
Paris had beei^ gratuitously attributed to Cleineiis, in lifce 
manner Albinus has been mentioned by some as the Parent of 
the celebrated University of Pavia. All thisy howeyer, is but 
jpaere assertion and clearly repqgnant to histprical authority. 
iUbinus taught at Pfivia with great success for mi^ny years, 
and several worjcs including epistles apd rhetorical precepts 
are attributed to him. The year in vvhich these learned teach- 
ers died hfU3 not be^n ascertained; but their exertions in the 
cause of morality and of literature were for a long period grater 
fully remembered in ^hese countries, and have, been honour-r 
ably noticed by m^y of their ancient and most distinguished 
writers. 

In the meantime tb^ Church of Ireland continued tQ flourish 
with additional lustrei a^id while numbers of her ecclesiastics 
had been dispersed over the nations of Eurppe her schools 
were as usual frequented 1)y fpreigners, and her reputation aa 
^ land pf science and of sanctity vras nobly upheld and uni* 
Y^rsally admitted. Knowledge, religion and happiness reigned 
throughout the land, w)ien, in the year 795, the Sccmdanavian 
{idventurers, coQ[imonly called Danes, first invaded the coasts 
pf Ireland* and laid waste the sm^ll island of Raghlin in the 
County of Antrim, Holmpatrick and other places^f The de- 
solation which these barbarians had spread throughout the 
kingdom and the sufferbgs whiph the Irish Church had 
undergone during the whole period of their invasion shall be 
noticed in their proper place; meanwhile, the other ecclesias- 
tipal events connected with the eighth century shall, agree- 
ably to our original plan, occupy the two foUowmg chapters. 

♦ Ware, Antiq. c. 24. t I'lstex Aonals— App. &c. 



CHAPTER IL 

Successors of Si. Patrich-^Episcopal Sees-^^Iteligioust 
Foundations of the Eighth Century. 

On the death of Flan Fehhla, Archbishop of Armagh, in 
716y SviBHKE OF SwBEMY, SOU of Cronmail was appointed 
his successor. This Prelate was a great encourager of learn* 
ing, and daring his incumbency several scribes and other 
eminent men presided over the schools of Ireland; among 
these are recorded Colman sumamed Hua*machensis,i author 
of the Acts of St Patrick ; Eochad Mac-Colgan an ancho^. 
ret and professor of Armagh; Ferdomnach a learped scribe 
and philosopher; Pochumna sumamed Bolga, an ancho*i 
ret and teacher of the holy Scriptures, &c. Suibhne having 
governed the Archiepiscopal See for fifteen years was sue-, 
ceeded by Ck)NGus, a descei^dant of Anmira(:us Mqnarch o( 
Ireland. Before Congus had been raised to tl^e episcopacy, 
he obtained the title qf scribe, whicbx ^ Colgan observes, 
belonged exclusively to men of letters, professors, and parT 
ticularly to authors.* This Prelate was well versed in poetry, 
and when archbishop addressed a poem to Aidus Ollain, 
King of Ireland; recommending that Monarch to punish 
Rory King of Ulster, fqr having sacrilegiously plundered 
some churches and religious hpiises in the diocess of Armagh.f 
Congus presided over Armagh for twenty years and had for 
successors Kele-Petrus of Ui*Bressail, now Clan-brassil, in 
the County of Armagh; Ferdachrich son of Suibne; anc( 

• Tr. Th. p. 294. t Harris' Bishops. 



190 

Foennelach, son of Moenach.* According to the Psalter of 
Cashel this latter Prelate was followed in regular succession 
by Dubdaiethe, Arectac, Cudiniscus, and Conmach, whose 
incumbency commenced in 791 and continued for sixteen 
years. It is to be regretted that the Acts of these Prelates 
haye been destroyed, and even as to dates there seem to ex- 
ist an apparent diversity and much confusion between the 
Psalter of Cashel, the Four Masters, Colgan, and all w$ 
antiquarian authorities. 

It has been observed in the foregoing century that almost 
all the episcopal sees which flourish at this day, had been 
founded up to that period; the few that remain owe their 
origin to subsequent times, and shall be noticed in chronolo- 
gical order, together with the history of such unions as had 
at diflbrent periods taken place, 

The Sbb of Kii,f.A.LOB was founded about the commeaee^ 
ment of the eighth century by St. Flannan, son of the pious 
King Theodorict Some writers assign the foundation of this 
See to an earlier period, and maintain that Flannan was a 
disciple of St. Molua Lobhar from whom the See derives its 
pame, and who flourished about the close of the sixth cen<* 
tury. Such, however, could not be the foot, as his fother 
Theodoric had not been in Lismore until about the year 700, 
St. Flannan might very probably have been a student in the 
Monastery of Killaloe, which was founded by St, Molua, 
his great grand uncle ; and this it was which most seemingly 
gave rise to the opinion of his having been a diaciple of that 
Saint. According to Ware, who is followed by Harris and 
others, Flannan was consecrated at Rome by John IV. in 
639; but as has been already observed, this chronology can- 
pot be admitted. Theodoric the father of St. Flannan wis a 
munificent benefactor to this See, and endowed it with very 
fimple revenues.:): The year of St. Flannan's death is not 

« Ware B»bop9. t Vit. Flan.' t Ware Antiq. c« 29. 



191 

known, but ht^ festival is oUerred on the 18th of Decem- 
ber. The chiurcheg and religious establishments of the dio* 
cess of Killaloe suffered awfully during the incursions of the 
Danes. From the death of the founder to the time of the 
learned O'Lonergan Bishop of Killaloe, in 1160, the names 
of only five of its prelates have been recorded; after this 
period the succession becomes regular and complete, pre* 
senting a catalogue of men distingubhed for piety and learn- 
ing and by their labours advancing the interest of religion, 
particularly in this extensive and celebrated district of the 
south of Ireland. 

Roscommon was an Episcopal See in the eighth century, 
and had for its first Bishop St. Coman or Comman, from 
whom it derived its name.* St. Coman before his elevation 
to the. episcopacy was the author of a monastic rule which 
was held in great veneration, and was exclusively followed 
in Connaught and other parts of Ireland. The Acts of this 
Saint are very imperfect, and according to the Annals of 
Boyle quoted by Ware, he died on the 26th of December, 
A.D. 746. 

Mayo was likewise an Episcopal See in this age, over 
which St. Muredach presided about the year 726.f It is 
considered to have taken its origin from the monastery 
founded here by St. Colman of Lindisiame, and is ranked 
together with that of Roscommon in the diocesan catalogue 
of the Council of Kells.:|: 

FoBB, in Westmeath, was about the same time the seat 
of a bishop, althoij^h it was not in any age a regular Epis- 
copal See. St. Suarlech succeeded the Abbot Dubdaboren in 
736, and was afterwards raised to the episcopal rank.§ Ac- 
cording to the Four Masters, this Saint died on the 27th of 
March, A.D. 746. His successor Aedgen enjoyed the same 
d^nity, after whom we find no other bishop residing at Fore* 

* A. A. S. S. p, 406. t W. p. e05. $ See Cent. XII. c. I. § A, A. S. S. p. 772. 



192 

Clonbalkin, (Cluain-dolcamO in which a celebrated 
monaatery had been founded by St. Cronan Mochua, had a 
Bishop St. Ferfugilly who died in 785, and whose festival was 
celebrated on the 10th of March.* 

St. Sbdulius, who died in 786 is mentioned by Marian 
Gorman as Bishop of Ath-Cliath^ now Dublin. It is, how- 
ever, conjectured, and with great probability, that SednUus 
as well as Suarlech and Ferfugill, had belonged merely to the 
chorepiscopal body. 

The Chobbpiscofi were in these thnes very numerous in 
Ireland, and continued to a later date in the Irish Church 
than perhaps in that of any other country. They were re- 
gularly ordained or consecrated bishops, without possessing 
the canonical episcopal jurisdiction over a see or district. — 
Many of them had been stationed in the large monasteries, 
some were attached to the Cathedral Church and assisted the 
Ordinary in several of his offices, and numbers of them had 
the pastoral care of rural districts ; still, however, subject to 
the jurisdiction of the Ordinary of the diocess. Agreeably to 
the Canons of the Council of Nice three bishops, at leasts 
should be present at the episcopal ordination; but it appears 
that the Chorepiscopi used to be consecrated by the Bishop, 
properly so called, or Ordinary of the diocess, without any 
application having been made for the assistance of other 
bishops. That this was lawful and customary appears from 
the 10th Canon of the Council of Antioch; and Bingham 
states that the city-bishops, or ordinaries, were accountable 
for the ordination of the country-bishops (Chorepiscopi,) to 
a provincial synod.f By the Canons of the Church, the 
ordinaries were not allowed, except on some very urgent oc- 
casions, to leave the sees to which they had been originally 
appointed; whereas, on the contrary, the Chorepiscopi were 
not unfrequently removed from one district or province to 

• A. A. S. S. p. 677. t Orig. Eccl. B. 12. 



193 

another, which renloyal serveB very often to indicate whether 
the person was an Ordinary or a Chorepiscopus, particularly 
in caseA where history observes a prdfoond silence as to the 
fact. 

The niimber of rel%iou8 (Bstablishments in Ireland, though 
yliry considifcrable wad^ m^verthelate) increased during the 
li^hth century; 

Thb MonAstbrt of ToMQBiirir iii ihe County of Clare, 
^vas erected by St; Munchen and claimed an high rank 
among th^ religions foundations of the country^ This 
Monastery continued to be the nursery di learning even in 
the most awfiil times; When in D64 the Banish power aroto 
io a firightfttl h^ight> and when neither the habitation of 
man or th<& sanctuary itself had b^n secured from the 
ravages df tfa^e infidels> the Abbi^ of Tomgrany Was pre- 
served by thi^ talented and holy Abbot Cormaeh O'Killeen; 
This eminent ecclesiastic is m^ntion^ by all our hi^blogists 
with g^i^at rttop^ct^ and is said io havt^ kept lip th^ nAgn of 
literature at Ifeast in Hiii own i^tabUshmi^nt^ when it was 
thither extinct or on the eve 6f d^trubtidn ih olhl^r and mt>re 
ambient plabto; After his deith the church Wits d^molisheft 
by the Danes^ but was rebuilt by Brian Bdroimhe. In the 
twelfth century this Abbey became numbered among the 
ruins of the coiintty; 

Thb Mohastbbt of KliLAcHAti in the tk>uUly bf datah, 
was established in this cdntury by St. Tigemach^ sdn of St. 
Mella of Dabre^melk.f this Saint laid the fdundatidnd tif 
siiveral religious hoosM> ^mdng Which shduld b^ notided the 
celebrated Monastery ntar the lak^ Melgi^, or Loiigh Melve> 
in the County df L^itrim^ Which h^ afterwards resigned Io 
his mother and in whibh that hbly Womah> aticompahied bjr 
a number of female, spent several years df cSxtraordinary 
mortification and piety. The Abbey of Killachad was grciatl jf 

•A. A.S.S.p. 332i tW.p.796. 

2 B 



194 

distinguished for its eminent prc^essors, among whom were 
Robhertach an eminent scribe and author, who died in 
844; Dubtach also a scribe, and the learned O'Kearta, who 
flourished at the close of this century.* About the year 1 180 
it was plundered by the English and became a ruin.t 

The Abbey of Imistiooe, in the County of Kilkenny^ 
was founded most probably by St. Moelruan, and continued 
during this and the following century eminently distinguished 
as the retreat of learned and holy men. It had been several 
limes plundered by the Danes and was ultimately demolished. 
However, in 1210, the Abbey was rebuilt by Thomas, son 
of Anthony, Seneschal of Leinster, for Augustinian Canons^ 
and dedicated to the Blessed Virgin and St. ColumbkilL — 
Alured, a Canon of Kells, was its first Prior, and the founder 
granted to bim and to the Abbey, the Churches of Orenan 
and Kilerenath. The last Prior was Miles Baron alias Fitz- 
gerald, who at very great expense built a new steeple and ad- 
ded an extensive cloister to this priory: he became Bishop 
of Ossory in 1527, but held the priory by a dispensation 
from the Pope until the suppression of religious houses.;}^ An 
inquisition was held in the 10th year of Blizabeth, when the 
splendid possessions of this Abbey were seized upon and 
granted to Edmund Butler and his heirs, in capite, at an 
annual rent of £28 12s.§ The rectory of White Church in 
the same County, being parcel of the possessions of this 
Priory, was soon after granted to Thomas Earl of Ormond.H 

The Monastery of Inismurrat was erected by St. 
DichoUa on an island in the great Western Ocean, about 
five miles from the main land of the barony of Carbury, 

• Tr. Th. p. 633. f Annal. Inisfal. t Ware Annalf. 

$ This property was situated in the Counties of Kilkenny, Carlow, and Wexford, 
and consisted of various Rectories, Messuages, &c., and aboat 800 acres of arable 
and pasture land. — Aud. Gen. 

II King, p. 334. 



195 

County of Sligc* This island is an immense rock rising 
with frightful precipices towards the ocean^ but shelving 
gently on the opposite side towards the coast^ and contains 
about 130 acres of shallow soil. In 807 the Danes effected 
a landing and set fire to the Abbey; the ruins of two of the 
^bapels ai% still to be seen, one of which has an extraordinary 
window, jbhe arch whereof is 01^ immense eliptical rock aU 
Viost in its original state» 

Thb MpKASTJBgY OF RoscQMMi^N wss fouoded by St. Co«> 
9xan about the q^id^le of the eighth century. Besides the 
severity of the institate which hfLd been drawn up by the 
founder himself, this Abjbey was celebrated for its schools 
9iid the number of its learned profei^sors who continued to 
teach here until the ye.ar 1 }77, when the English army took 
possession of the Abbey in their route from Dublin to the 
lyest of Ireland^t Among its learoepi teachers may be no* 
ticed the Abbot and Bishop Cormac O'l^illane, in 964; Flani^ 
gan Roe, and Aidan, two learned professors of the eleventh 
century; O'Qmpally, Feargal, and O'Braoin, scribes and 
commentators of the twelfth century; and the learned O'Cor- 
macan who was Abbot in 1177, when the English came to 
Roscommon. Turlogh the Great was a particular benefactor 
to this establishment, and in 1156^ after having augmented 
its estates, he caused the blessed Sacrament to be cairied 
with great solemnity attended by the clergy and religious 
from all parts of Ireland and afterwards deposited in this 
Abbey, in a tabernacle of immense value prepared for it. J It 
was governed by its abbots in succession until the 20th of 
Elizabeth, when its possessions consisting of 30 quarters of 
lands and various Rectories were granted at an annual rent 
to Sir Nicholas Malbye.§ A second inquisition was held un- 
der James I., when various other property together with the 
Rectories and tithes of eighteen parishes were seized upon 
and held from the King in pure and common soccage.|| 

* Annal. Four Masters. f Aonal. AnnoQ. t O'HoUaran vol. II. 

§ Aud. Gen. II Lib. loquUit, 



196 

To these mi|y l^ subjoined the following abbies whiph owe 
ibeir foandfttaon to ibis cenipry. 

TojB Abbby pB AcHAD-HVB, or the Qreep4ofrd, in Qssory, 
fpunded by St. La^^t^Qi A.D. 7Q0. I>i0Brt?tola, b the 
County of ^^BJ^, foi^nded }>y Bt. Tola, A.Q. 720« Kill- 
GBLB«<;aBifMT, in the County of lYeatmeathj; founded by St 
C!hri8ticola. I^ilfobiiik, in thfi (bounty of Clare, founded 
by S^ F)annan. Tallaqh^ in t^^ County pf Dul)lip, foundefif 
|>y St. Mofilrnan. Killoiit, in the County of Roscommon^ 
founded by St. Coman. Ankadufbb, in the County of 
lieitrim, founded by St Tigemach. I^foiRB-MsLLB, in the 
County of Leitriniy founded l>y St Tigemach. Ikdbnbn, iq 
^e territory of Br^ja, near Drogheda, by St Suariach. 
Lbgkvaoh, in the Co^nty of M^thj» founded by St. Coe^ 
man. DisbrttFulartagh, in t^e Queen's County, founded 
by St Fulf^rtacb* Kilshankt, in the County of Clare, 
founded by St. Comin. 

From the«e and the fof^ndatioiui of pre^edipg times, mul- 
titudef of ^ealo^s and learned mi^sions^ries came forth and 
contributed to the splendour of religion at home, as well as 
fo its estabjishmeift in (]|u9fant and unconverted li^nds. 



CHAPTER III, 

ffeli^iQus and Literary Charactprs^ qf fhe Mi^hth Century-^. 
Gfi^eral Observfitions^ 

III noticing some of tb^ (smiii^nt mfsn of U^is figOi yt^ shaU 
pommenpe with Ai>4«[K4n the Iparned Abbot of ^y, Tbi^ 
flistinguigb^d F^tber of tbe f risb Cburph wimi of tbe race of 
%h^ Qprtbqil If i^l4^ and was born in \\ie territory pf Ti^cou-? 
ni&l abont tbe year 627.* Tbe history of bis ea|;ly life r&t 
mtiins unknpwo, bpt it is generally supposed that h^ receive^ 
his pdupatioii in the Mpnastery pf Hy, and haying embrace4 
Ibe Cplumbian institute b^ sopn after i^tfim^ to his owiv 
pomitry. To Adamnan is attnbifted th^ foundation of the 
great Abbey of Raphpe^ oyer which bp presided as Abbot; 
until thfs year 67P when he was rai^^d tp tbp supr^mp goTemQ 
ment of the whole Columbian Qrd^r, both in {rpland ^d ii| 
thp Hebrides. T^e lisari^ing find sup^^or q^alitips of thic| 
great man bad endearpd him to piany pf the princes, prelates^ 
and other eminent phi^pt^r^ of t||ese times. Among }x\% 
principid admir^ was A^frid^ thp pip]i8 fmd enligbtpppd King 
of Northfimbprland, Tl^i^ Prince pn thp d^atb pf ^il ff^ther 
Oswin tpok shelter in Irelaqd, whpre, as Bpdp tpsti^es, he 
applied hi^nself diligently tp stqdy and pa^ticplarly to that 
of the sapred Spriptures} but aftpr thp demise of his brother 
Egfrid he was recalled and placed on the throne of Nor-r 
thumberland. It appears that Egfrid, displeased at the bosr 
pitable reception which his brother Alfrjd had met with ii^ 
Ireland; was resolyed to yent bi? ragp ph tI)ose ^|ipm Ifp 

• Tr.Th.p.480 



198 

should rather consider as friends.''^ For this purpose he 
caused a band of Saxon pirates to proceed to Ireland and in- 
fest the entire coast of the ancient Bregia, extending from 
Publin to'Drogheda. * Several towns were stormed by these 
marauders — terror and dismay spread along the country, and 
having thus executed the barbarous commands of their mas- 
ter they returned to their vessels laden with plunder and con- 
veying away great numbers of the unoffending inhabitants 
into captivity. As soon, however, as Alfrid had succeeded 
to the throne, Adamnan his particular friend having been 
then Abbot of Hy proceeded to Northumberland and waited 
on the King. This visit had for its object the recovery of the 
property and of the captives, many of whom were still de- 
tained in bondage throughout the north of England. In this 
mission Adamnan succeeded, and after having remained for 
some time at the court of this Prince, he returned to his 
cloister and applied himself to the important duties connected 
with the government of his order. Nor was this the only 
visit which Adamnan had made to the court of Alfrid: about 
the year 702 he was again entrusted with an important com- 
mission and sent by his countrymen to the King of Northum- 
berland. It was on this occasion that he happened to meet 
with the Abbot Ceolfrid, and after having conversed with 
him aiid other ecclesiastics on the subject of the Roman 
Paschal computation he finally resolved to adopt it, and 
promised to use his influence in having it received and prac- 
tised among his countrymen.^- In this undertaking he suc- 
ceeded throughout Ulster, while the members of his institute 
at Hy and in the Hebrides adhered to the old Irish Paschal 
cycle until some years after his death. Adamnan had been 
in Ireland during the Easter of 704 and celebrated that Feast 
at the time specified by the Roman calculation; he soon after 
returned to Hy, and died on the 23rd of the following Sep- 

• Eccl. Hist. L. 4. t Bedc L. 6. 



199 

tember^ in the 77th year of his age.''^ This distinguished 
ecclesiastic has been ranked among the fathers of the Irish 
Church, and his memory was held in great veneration par- 
ticularly in Tirconnel and in the Western Isles. Among his 
writings are classed the following works: a Life of St. Co- 
lumba, in three books; afterwards published by Canisius at 
Ingolstad; from a manuscript of the Windberg Monastery: 
a Treatise on the Holy Land, from which Bede has taken 
many extracts: a Life of St Patrick: a Collection of Epistles 
and Poems: a Monastic Rule: a Book of Canons, extant 
in the Cottonian Library: and a Treatise on the proper cele- 
bration of the Feast of the Passover.f 

St. CoLOA or Colcus, sumamed the Wise, flourished in the 
eighth century. This distinguished man was descended 
from the ancient family of Hua-Dunechda and when very 
young was placed in the schools of Clonmacnois. From his 
intimate acquaintance with the sacred Scriptures and espe- 
cially with the Psalter and the writings of St. Paul, he was 
considered in those days the most learned man in Ireland, 
and was usually styled 'Hhe Scribe, or Doctor of all the 
Scots.'^ Colga delitered lectures for many years in the 
school of Clonmacnois, and held a correspondence with 
several of the most learned men of his time, among whom 
was the celebrated Alcuin. One of these important epistles 
of Alcuin has been published from two ancient manuscripts 
of the Cottonian Library and thence copied by Colgan. It 
is headed '^ Albini Magistri ad Colcum lectorem in Scotia," 
and is thus addressed, ^'Benedicto Magistro et pio patri Col- 
cu, Al9uine humilis Levita Salutem."j; In this letter the 
writer styles Colcus his most holy Father, and calls himself 
his son; he then gives him a most satisfactory account of the 
state of religion on the Continent, and after alluding to some 

• Annals of Ulster— Four Masters. t Ware Writers. 

t lTslicrEp.Hib.Syl. No. 18. 



200 

mMunderstanding which had taken place between Charles of 
France and Ofia the Mercian King, he refers to the journey 
which he was about to undertake for the purpose of effecting 
a reconciliation between these Princes; and concludes hj 
sending several presents to Colcu, to the Bishops of Ireland^ 
and to the Crommtinity of Cionmacnoidy reccfrnmending him- 
self at the same iimci to thdir pntyert. Colcu is said to have 
written somcl l^ameid annotations On thfe Scripltures and several 
valtiable tnicts; oM tif which entitle ''Scopa devdtionis/' 
has b^n pmserved; I'hift hol5r and Idamed mitn di^ on thd 
20th of February, A,D. 792!;* 

St MoBLBUAN, a tont^mpoitLiy of Colcus, was Abbot and 
Bishop of Tallagh) about five miles from Dublin. The 
Monastery of Tallagh during the goreimment of this Saint 
was eminently distingtiished for the number of its learned 
men; among whom the hagiolo^ilit Aengus was not th^ leafit 
conspicuous. While th^ virttles of its holy Abbot served to 
illustratfii the doctrine whiish he dnforCed, his talents and 
research enabled him to throw new lights on mtoy obscure 
and difficult points of ecclesiastical literature. St Moelruan 
has been deservedly ranked among the most learned mto of 
the day, and was the principal author of the celebrated 
MartyrolOgy of Tallagh (Martyrologium Tamlactense).t — 
This Martytx>logy is entitled Martyrologium Aengurii filU 
Hua^hUnii et Moelruani, and is considered by antiqua- 
rians as the most copious of the kind written in any country 
at that period. From the name of Aengus having been 
marked in the title it is conjectured by some critics that the 
work had been first undertaken by Moelruan and was after-' 
wards continued by Aengus. St. Moelruan died on the 7th 
of July, A,D. 788.t 

St Albuiw or WiTTA, the Apostle of Thuringia, was a 
native of Ireland and flourished in this century. Thrithemius 

* A. A. S. S. at 20 Tib, f Id. p. 581 . ^ t Four blasters. 



201 

atHnns that Album embraced the monastic state in Ireland and 
afterwards repaired to Germany, where he Converted num- 
bers to the faith, and became Bishop about the year 741. — 
He entered on the same mission with St. Boniface tod was 
appointed by hiln Bishop of Buraburg ne^r Fritzlar, in 
Hesse.* Albuin was greatly admired for his knowledge of 
the sacked writihgs, and by his preaching and missionary 
labours has been venerated a& the Apostle and Patron Saint of 
that extensive territory. Although very honourable toentioA 
is made of this apostolical man by Arnold Wion and others, 
yet the particulars of his eventful mission have not been 
handed down to us. Several works have been attributed to 
him, the only one of which extant is a book of meditations 
addressed to the people of Duringen. The festival of St. Al- 
buin is held on the 26th of October. 

St. Alto, descended from an illustrious Irish family, arrived 
in Bavaria about the same time that Virgilius had been 
actively employed on his mission in that country. + With a 
determination of leading a life of penance he withdrew to a 
forest situated between Augsburg and Munich, and in this 
desolate abode Alto spent several years as an ascetic. The 
fame of his sanctity soon spread through the neighbouring 
tountry, and among the number of his admirers was Pepin, 
then King of that territory. This religious Prince, anxious 
for the reformation of his people and placing a high value on 
the services of the Saint, earnestly entreated him to leave hrs 
solitude. At length finding his solicitations ineffectual he 
consented to grant him some ground in the heart of the forest 
for the purpose of erei^ting thereon a church and a monastery. 
This work was undertaken in 750, and the church when 
finished was dedicated by St. Boniface; it was called from the 
fiaint himself Alto-Muwstbr, or Alt-Muitster, and was 
the fruitful nursery of saints and learned men^ St. Alto is 

• Fleury, L. 42. A. A, S. S. p. 302. 

2 C 



202 

said to have composed several devotional works; the year of 
his death has not been ascertained^ but his memory was 
revered on the 9th of Febniary. 

DicuiL a learned grammarian and geometrician flourished 
at the close of the eighth century^ and was, as he himself 
testifies, a native of Ireland. The Acts of this eminent man 
have perished amidst the confusion of the Danish wars, 
during which period piles of manuscripts and other monu- 
ments of antiquity, which would serve to illustrate the annals 
of those times, had been wantonly destroyed. Dicuil has 
written '^A Greometrical Account of the Provinces of the 
Earth, according to the authority of those (to use his own 
words) whom Theodosius the Emperor had sent to measure 
the same." This work is extant in manuscript. He has 
also been the author of a treatise ''On the Ten Questions 
in the Art of Grammar."* 

Having proceeded thus far, it may not perhaps be considered 
irrelevant to examine in this place the character and object 
of those ancient monastic institutions, which in this country 
owe their origin to the eighth and the preceding centuries. — 
In this examination an almost countless variety of topics 
present themselves, from among which three principal points 
shall be selected. In the first place, the men who composed 
these several monastic orders had in view an object above all 
others the most sublime and to man the most interesting. — 
Secondly, in attaining this object they could not be considered 
an incumbrance to any community; and thirdly, so iar from 
being an incumbrance they were a national benefit. That their 
object had been most interesting is a Christian truth, which 
no man acquainted with religion will venture to deny. To 
calm the fury of contending passions and to save human 
nature from the wreck, a benign providence has prescribed 
certain rules, some of which are enforced as precepts, and 

♦ Ware Writers. 



203 

others are recommended as counsels. Among these counsels 
are three, which formed an essential component of every 
monastic order, and which its members were obliged to ob* 
serve by vows the most sacred. These were voluntary 
poverty, perpetual chastity, and constant unqualified obe-^ 
dience. To these were added the observance of certain con- 
stitutions, comprehending a variety of duties extremely rigor- 
ous, and to which human nature in the innate rankness of its 
corruption felt a strong and an intuitive repugnance. These 
rules bad been fiuthfully observed by numbers, and while 
they conducted man to heaven they served to afford another 
triumph to the truths of the Christian Gospel. Again, in 
attaining the objects which they had contemplated, these men 
were no inconvenience whatever to any portbn of society, — 
It is a well known feet, that all thesfe monastic establishments 
had beeo foundjed and brought at length to a flourishing con-* 
dition by the exclusive industry and perseverance of the 
monks themselves. The monasteries of these centuries were, 
generally speaking, situated in places origmally barren and 
desolate. When the servant of God went in quest of a spot on 
which he might erect his establishment, he repaired to the un-* 
cultivated mountain or to the dreary forest and oftentimes to the 
solitary island around which the ocean billows dashed, but 
whose bleak and frightful shore no living creature had ven- 
tured to inhabit. On this mountam, and in this forest, and 
within this deserted island the monks of the early ages of 
the Irish Church settled themselves. Their habitations were, 
of course, at the first onset lowly and miserable: in lapse of 
time and by unremitted labour they shook the rock from the 
mountain, they levelled the forest, they compelled the stony 
soil of the island to yield to their industry, they did what 
the rest of the inhabitants of the country had neither fortitude 
or ingenuity to do; in short, they rendered the mountain a 
profitable farm, they transformed the forest into a delightful 
garden, and the very island with all its barrenness into a 



204 

second paradise. Hence it is, that in the acquisition of prc^^ 
perty these monastic bodies were generally indebted to their 
own persevering industry^ It has in the third place been 
stated, that the ancient monks of Ireland had been a benefit 
to the community. Should this truth require illustration we 
need but refer to the history of the last three centuries. — 
While these monastic foundations had been suffered to 
flourish, the poor of the country knew where to find an 
asylum and a home ; in short these religious establishments 
were in effect national alms-houses, and at the same time 
were no burden or expense to the public. Nor were the ser^ 
vices of these monastic communities limited to meie acts of 
charity ; they contributed in no small degree to advance the 
national interest by diffusing among all classes a spirit of in^ 
dustry and a knowledge of the principles of civilized life; 
and it is a well known fact that most of our towns and 
ancient cities took their fise from the solitary religious estaln 
lishment which in the early ages of our national Church had 
been previously erected in those places. But the paramount 
utiUty of the monastic orders appeared most conspicuous in 
their unremitted exertions towards advsmcing the cause of 
literature through the medium of public gratuitous education. 
Besides the leading seminaries which have been already 
noticed, almost every monastery had a school of education 
fittached to iti and in this school were taught the truths of 
religion and the literature of the day. The foreigner as well 
as the native was received with welcome, and he was not 
only educated but supported and furnished with books gra- 
tuitously by the pious, the noble-minded, generous monks 
of Ireland. The conclusion which must be drawn from these 
few observations, may be readily anticipated; if these an- 
cient monastic institutions of Ireland had been, as they 
really were, a national benefit, it clearly follows that their 
suppression must have been, in the strict sense of the word, 
a national injury, 



NINTH CENTURY. 
CHAPTER I. 

Sufferings of the Irish Church during the Danish Inposiou"^ 
Columbian Establishments in the Hebrides pillaged by the 
Ostmen-^Translation of the shrine and relics of St. Co* 
lumbhill to Ireland — The Irish Clergy exempted Jrom 
the obligation of attending Military expeditions — Effects 
of the Danish Wars — Increase of Irish Missionaries--^ 
History of Dungal — Of St. Donatus^-^md of John Sco^ 
tus Erigena. 

That Christianity had been established in Ireland without 
having to struggle against the terrors of persecution is a fact 
no less true than remarkable. In other nations the Gospel 
was preached amidst the violence and uproar of the bigot 
and the tyrant, and the storm when abated was soon suc*» 
ceeded by the fury of the tempest; not so in Ireland, here 
the progress of the Gospel was undisturbed, and it rose like 
the sun in the heavens and became resplendent without 
scarcely a vapour to scatter its rays or a cloud to darken its 
effulgence. Some modem writers have attempted to unravel 
and in short to account for this moral phenomenon. But 
the reasons which they assign besides being superficial 
might, moreover, with great propriety be equally applied to 
any other portion of the Christian world. It is most clear 
that the Church of Ireland had, in its infancy, been singu-p 
lariy cherished, and Providence in its unsearchable ways 
allowed it to grow up and strengthen; but it had its night 
and its darkness with the storm and the tempest, and since 
the foundation of Christianity no other particular Church has 



206 

passed througb such a crucible — such a frightful ordeal of 
woes and sufferings^ both public and private^ individual and 
pational. This is a truth which the man of natural sympathy 
would consider both melancholy and awful; but the Irish 
catholici viewing it through its proper medium, will glory in 
it; it is, however, a truth — an undeniable truth which the 
subsequent pages of this work may serve to elucidate. It has 
been already noticed that the Scandinavians or Danes had 
made their appearance on the coast of Ireland about the close 
of the foregoing century.* In the the year 807 these North- 
men effected a second landing in Ireland, destroyed Ros- 
common and laid vr^ste the surrounding country. Encour- 
aged by these repeated successes they arrived with a 
stronger fleet in 812, but were overcome in two battles and 
great slaughter ensued. However, in 821 the Danes made 
a still more formidable attack on Ireland and spread univer- 
sal terror through the country. At this time they stormed 
find laid waste Cork, Lismore, and the Monastery of the 
island of Cape Clear. About this period, likewise, the great 
]\f onastery of Bangor was plundered and almost levelled to 
\he ground. The Abbot and nine hundred of the monks 
^ere put to death, while the rich shrine of St. Comgal hav- 
ing been broken open, the relics were taken out and scattered 
ynth the winds of heaven.f In this manner did they con- 

^ Tntttng of these nortbem ftdventuren Usher siyi, " Livonia, extendtng to 
the eastern shore of the Baltic Sea, is divided into three parts, differing from each 
Other in manners and language ; viz., Estia, Lettta, and Curlandia. Tlie province 
pf Estit was inhabited by those whom the ancient Greeks denominated Ostiaei and 
Ostiooes. By Tacitus in Qermania, they were called ^stii; by Eginhard in th« 
)ifeof Charles the Great, Aistij by Sazo Grammaticus, Estones; by us OsUnanni 
or Easterliogs. The Easterliogs of Ireland were also called by other names, viz., 
^anet, Norvegiatis, and Kormant, which was a name common to all the people of 
Denmark, Norway, Livonia, and the rest of the northrea nations." — (In Voter. 
£p. Hib.) According to Glaus Wormius, " piracy was among the Danes accounted 
honourable and lawful -, their kings and their children, with the most valiant and 
notorious they could find addicted themselves to that sort of life." 

t Keating, B. 2. 



207 

tinue year after year their depredations^ new fleets arriting 
and fresh conquests the inevitable result, until 835 when 
Turgesius the Dane landed with a powerful army and de- 
stroyed all Connaught together with some districts of Lein- 
ster and Meath. Ulster shared the same fate — churches and 
monasteries were every where demolished — their libraries 
consumed, and the sanctuary and the cloister deluged with 
the blood of the clergy.* Turgesius entered Armagh and 
expelled the Archbishop Faranan together with all the re- 
ligious and students of that ancient and celebrated place. — 
Ckdgan states, moreover, that in the year 838 the Danes 
with a fleet of sixty sail entered the rivers Boyne and Liffey, 
and spreading themselves over the plains through which tiiese 
rivers flow plundered in all directions churches, monasteries 
and the dwellings of all sorts of people. During the sway 
of Turgesius, the Danes pillaged Cork, Ferns, Armagh, 
Clonfert, Slane, Louth, Birr, Clonmacnois, Saigar, Tirdag- 
lass. Mayo, and Taghmon."t In short there had been 
scarcely any part of Ireland secured from the ravages of 
these unsparing plunderers. About the year 848 Tui^sius 
was defeated in battle by Melseachlain (Malachy) King of 
Ireland, and falling into the hands of that Monarch was by 
his orders drowned in a lake called Loch-uar, near MuUingar. 
During the same year Malachy engaged the Danish forces 
at Fore and gained a complete victory; in this engagement 
seven hundred of the Scandinavians were slain, and before 
the end of that year two battles more had been fought in 
which one thousand seven hundred of the Danes perished. — 
On this occasion Malachy sent ambassadors with presents to 
Charley the Bald, King of France, intending thereby to 
form a bond of friendship with that Monarch, and obtain 
permission to pass through France on his way to Rome.j: 
The Danes continued to receive new reinforcements from 

* Jocelin Vita. S. Pat. t Annals of lAiusfiUIcn. | Ind. Cbron. A. 848. 



208 

Norway and Denmark^ and about 851 Dublin^ which was 
already in the possession of a body of these Northmen, 
called FinrgdU or white foreigners^ was attacked by another 
force called Dubh-gab or black foreigners, when an immense 
slaughter of the Fin-gals ensued and Dublin was stormed 
and plundered. But in 853 Amlave or Auliffe, accompanied 
by his two brothers, Sitric and Ivar, and a great fleet of 
Norwegians arrived in Ireland and all th^ Northmen in the 
kingdom submitted to him. Amlave took possession of Dub- 
lin — Limerick was enlarged and governed by Ivar, and Sitric 
built Waterford.* From this year until the close of the 
ninth century Ireland was one continued scene of engage- 
ments and slaughter, in which the Danes and the Irish were 
alternately victorious. As if to render this state of affairs 
still more calamitous, the Irish princes kept up repeated 
contentions among themselves. In some of these engage- 
ments the Danish troops were invited to take an active part 
and their assistance was solicited particularly by Aidus who 
in 863 had been raised to the throne of Ireland by the pow- 
erful aid which Amlave had afforded him.f In the midst of 
these awful occurrences desolation and terror stalked from 
one extremity of the country to the other; while cities^ towns, 
churches, and monasteries became a prey to the fury of the 
contending parties. 

Nor were the religious establishments in the Hebrides and 
along the western coast of Scotland secured from the irrup- 
tions of these pirates. The great Monastery of Hy appears 
to have been selected in a particular manner as the object of 
their fury. This establishment although extensive and of 
great celebrity, possessed none of those things which might 
invite the rapacity of the plunderer. Nevertheless, within 
its walls a treasure had been deposited which was esteemed 
more valuable by that religious community than all the 

* Oeraldas Top. Ilib. L. 3. t Annals of Innisfallen. 



209 

greatness and wealth of this world. It contained the shrine 
and relics q( St. Columba: Diermit was then Abbot of Hy, 
and this good man aware of the profanations to which the 
sanctuary had been hourly exposed deemed it most advisable 
to have the hallowed remains of the Saint removed as speedily 
as possible out of that island. Accordingly in 831 the relics . 
and shrine of St Columba were removed from the Charch of 
Hy and with other sacred memorials of antiquity were trans* 
lated to Ireland. The remains of St. Patrick bad, in the 
fifth century, been deposited at Down, while those of St. 
Bridgid were removed from Kiklare to that place by Kellach, 
Abbot of Kildare and Hy, about the year 810; thither also 
the remains of St. Columba were conveyed and with great 
pomp and solemnity placed in the same shrine with those of 
&L Patrick and St. Biidgid.* 

Donchad or Donagh, King of all Ireland, after having 
devoted the latter years of his life to prayer and penance 
died in 797 and had for successor Aldus sumamed Ordnidhe, 
son of the King Niell Frassach. During the reign of Aidus, 
the Irish clergy obtained an exemption from a duty in it- 
self disgraceful and altogether repugnant to the dignity of 
the clerical state. It ajqpears that a custom had at that time 
prevailed in Ireland of compelling bishops and abbots to at- 
tend the kings in. their military expeditions. The people of 
Leinster having incurred the displeasure of Aidus, that - 
Monarch raised a powerful army from all parts of Ireland and 
marched towards the borders of Leinster, with a determina- 
tion of reducing that Province to subjection. This army had 
been composed of men taken from every rank in society, 
comprising likewise a considerable number of ecclesiastics 
Among those who accompanied Aidus, were Conmach Arch- 
bishop of Armagh and Fothadius, a most learned and holy 
lecturer of that city ; when the army had arrived at the frontiers 

• Annals of Ulster at 831 

2 D 



210 

of Leinster the clergy in strong tennfi remonstrated with Aidas 
on the impropriety of compelling men to take up arms who 
by their situation in life ehould be the promotera of peafce. — 
Aidus listened with attention to their complaints and left 
the matter to the decision ot Fothadius. This learned 
ecclesiastic accordingly drew up a document in which he 
set forth the scandalous and uncanonical impropriety of 
such a custom ; and this statement of Fothadius made such 
an impression on the mind of Aidus, that he permitted the 
ecclesiastics who had accompanied the expedition to return 
home.* From this period that shameful practice fell into 
disuse and was afterwards by a positive law totally abolished. 
While the domestic and political state of society had been 
thus convulsed, it is remarkable with what order the schools 
belonging to some of the great establishments, particularly 
in the interior of the kingdom, had been conducted. The 
seminaries of Clonard, Clonfert, Leighlin, Lismore, and many 
others continued their lectures as usual, and although the 
great influx of foreigners, for whieh former ages had been 
remarkable, could not be expected to have taken place 
amidst the confusion of the ninth century, nevertheless, the 
ancient spirit of literature was not extinguished, and the halls 
of many of our learned institutions were filled vrith numbers 
of scholars and of eminently distinguished professors. Con- 
sidering, likewise, the awful complexion of the times, eccle- 
siastical discipline was regularly enforced and most scrupu- 
lously observed in each diocess. But the most singular and 
undoubted fact is, that since the establishment of Christi- 
anity, no century had produced more illustrious or tal- 
ented men. Many of these repaired to the continent of 
Europe, partly for the purpose of retirement and study, but 
much more from an anxious wish to serve mankind and to 
lend their assistance in the general diflusion of the Gospel. — 

♦ Four Masters at A. 800. 



211 

Great numbers remained in Ireland, end according as society 
began to assume a more settled aspect and as opportunities 
might permit, they impressed the truths of Christianity on 
the hearts of the Danes and were the happy instruments in 
effecting the conversion of that enterprising and hitherto in- 
fidel people. From the catalogue of those who became dis- 
tinguished on the Continent a few shall be selected, while a 
brief account of the reminder shall be reserved for the third 
chapter. 

DuNGAL, tiie celebrated opponent of Claudius the Icono- 
clast, flourished in this century and was a native of Ireland."*^ 
According to the most probable account Dungal belonged to 
the establishment of Bangor. Having been oompelled to 
leave that place in consequence of the cruelty of the Danes, 
he retired first to France and afterwards to Italy. During 
his abode in France Dungal spent some time as a recluse in 
the Monastery of St. Denis. Here he applied himself to 
contemplation and study, and composed his learned epistle 
on the two solar eclipses of 810, which he dedicated to 
Charlemagnct Dungal's talents and information soon ren- 
dered him conspicuous, and he became a great favourite of 
Charlemagne, who besides his love for military glory was 
also an admirer and a patron of learning. Having remained 
but a very short time in the Monastery of St. Denis, Dun- 
gal was prevailed upon to leave his solitude and was after- 
wards employed in delivering lectures on mathematical and 
theological subjects in some of the most celebrated schools of 
that country. About this period he published his collection 
of poems, one of which in praise of Charlemagne has been 
particularly admired, and in it he calls himself <zn Irish exile. 
Some years after Dungal repaired to Italy where he was ap- 
pointed professor at Pavia, and his instructions were attended 
by students from Milan, Lodi, Brescia, Bergamo, Tortona, 

• Histoin Litteraire, Tom, 4. f D*Achery, Specilegium, Tom. 10. 



212 

Novaroy Vercellii Acqui, Genoa, Asti, and Como.* The 
heresy of the Iconoclasts, which had made its appearance in 
the eighth century and was condemned by the second Council 
of Nice, had it seems one favourite in this age. Icono* 
clasm might with propriety be termed an heretical vapour; 
it appeared and disappeared about the same moment. Its 
principal object was to oppose the veneration or relative re- 
spect which Catholics pay to the images and representations 
of Christ and his saints. So repugnant was this heresy not 
only to the apostolical practice of the ancient fathers of the 
Church but even to the dictates of nature and common 
sense, that it was universally condemned, and in a very short 
time became literally evanescent However, in the ninth 
century Claudius, Bishop of Turin, soon after his promotion 
to that See, made a vigorous but fruitless effort to revive it. 
This ambitious prelate had resolved to indulge his vanity at 
the expense of religion, and knowing that the heresies .of 
ancient times had all disappeared without leaving scarcely a 
wreck behind, he preferred speculating in one of a more 
modem character and attempted to resuscitate Iconoclasm. — 
With this view he published a treatise which he called ''An 
Apology against Theodimir." In this work Claudius in* 
veighed against the respect due to images and to the cross; 
and insisted, moreover, that festivals should not be observed 
or saints invoked.f The work appeared when Dungal had 
been in Italy and it gave rise to a most learned and elaborate 
display of scriptural and historical erudition from the pen of 
our distinguished countryman. In answer to Claudius, Dun- 
gal published a treatise entitled ''Responsa contra perversas 
Claiidii Turonensis Episcopi Sententias."| In this work he 
demonstrates from reason. Scripture and the universal prac- 
tice of mankind, that a proper reverential respect might be 
paid not only to an image of Christ, but also to those who 

• Maratori, Antiq. Ital. Tom. 3, f Fleury, L. 47. t Bibliofh. Patv. of Lyon*. 



213 

proved themseWes to be followers of Christ; and not only to 
the living members who were the temples of the Holy Ghost, 
but even to any lifeless significative object in which the great 
event of man's eternal redemption might have been represented. 
Treating on the invocation of saints^ Dungal observes^ ''If the 
apostles and martyrs while in this world could pray for others^ 
how much more can they do it after their crowns, victories, 
and triumphs?'' In conclusion, Dungal adds, ''How can a 
bishop^ who abhors the cross of Jesus Christ, perform the 
ecclesiastical functions, baptize, bless the holy chrism, im- 
pose hands, give benedictions, or celebrate mass? For, as 
St. Augustin observes, none of these functions can be duly 
exercised without making the sign of the cross." The learn- 
ing which pervades the entire, of this treatise proves most 
clearly the deep theological research of its author. Dungal 
besides his ecclesiastical informa,tion was gifted with a natural 
taste for poetry; but still paramount was his excellent know- 
ledge of mathematics and astronomy. Besides his celebrated 
work on the eclipses, which in his day was a singular master- 
piece of philosophical talent, there are other productions i^ 
garding the doubling of the cube, which some ancient lovers 
of science have attributed to Dungal. He possessed an ex- 
tensive collection of rare and rich works, which he bequeathed 
to the Monastery of Babbio. It is generally thought that 
Dungal died im that Monastery about tine year 834, and agree- 
ably to his own wish had never been exalted to an higher 
rank in the Church than that of deacon. His death was 
greatly lamented, and various eulogiums have been written on 
the genius and merits of this learned Irishman,* who, in the 
centre of confusion at home and of heresy abroad, stood 
forth the banished exile from his country and the learned ad- 
vocate of the sacred and ancient religion of his fore&thers. 

* Some of tbem have been published bj Mariene, in one of which (Epitaphmn) 
we read : " Scripluras promit casto de pectorc sacras. Edocet infirmos et validos 
pariter. Lacte rigans puero0| et dat capientibus escam. Hiac lac ut capiant, tode 
cibum pariter," &c. 



214 

Among other holy and enlightened men^ who during the 
irruptions of the Danes had fled to the Continent, was St« 
DoNATUSy afterwards Bishop of Fiesole in Tuscany. Dona^ 
tus was a bishop before he left his native country^* and most 
probably a Chorepiscopus. On his departure from Ireland 
he brought with him a very saintly and learned man named 
Andrew, who was afterwards deacon of the Church of Fiesole 
and founder of an extensive monastery at the foot of the 
Fiesole mountains. Donatus arrived at Rome during the 
reign of Louis the Pious, and soon afl;er repaired to Tuscany, 
where he employed himself in teaching gratuitously and was 
the author of several tracts partly poetical and partly theo- 
logical. His great learning and piety soon ranked him 
amongst the most distinguished ecclesiastics in that district, 
and the Diocess of Fiesole having been at this time vacant, 
Donatus was waited upon by the clergy and people, and re- 
quested to undertake its government. The year of his pro* 
motion is uncertain, but he was undoubtedly bishop there in 
844, in which year he was present at the coronation of Lewis 
(the son of Lotharius,) as King of Italy. In 861, he was 
present at a Lateran Council held under Nicholas I. against 
John of Ravenna; after which he governed the See of Fiesole 
for twelve years. Besides his profound knowledge of the 
Scriptures and his intimate acquaintance with the writings of 
the Fathers, Donatus was one of the most eminent poets of 
his day. According to Dempster, as quoted by Ware, he 
wrote an account of his own travels; also the office of his 
church and commentaries on the Holy Scriptures. Donatus 
composed a life of St. Bridgid, the prologue of which is ex- 
tant and has been prefixed by Colgan to a life said to have 
been written by St. Chilien of Iniskeltra. It has been 
noticed as an ancient and valuable fragment, while at the 
same time it serves to point out the genius, talent, and love 
of country for which this Prelate had been distinguished. — 



* A. A.S.S. p. 236. 



216 

St. Donatus died on the 22nd of October, A.D. 873,* and 
was interred in his own Cathedral. 

Of all the Irishmen who had in those times repaired to the 

Continent, the most learned and celebrated was John Scotus 

Erigena, or as some ancient manuscripts ha?e it, Eringena, 

Erin being the land which gave him birth.t John was not 

in holy orders, nor was he a monk, as some writers have with-* 

out any authority undertaken to assert. In classical and 

philosophical learning John Scotus Erigena stood unrivalled, 

but he was by no means deeply read in theological literature, 

nor has he during the early part of his life appeared to have 

^gl^^made it his study. About the year 840 he removed to 

*"^7/ y^Krance, where by his genius, learning and wit he became a 

' \^~J^t favourite with the French King, Charles the Bald. — > 

3 Monarch took such delight in his conversation, that he 

him constantly at court, and did him the honour of re- 

ta« h^iix^ng him as a guest at his table. The royal presence was 

*Tim fii^ estraint on John, and although he oftentimes indulged 

^^g^it^wit at the expense of the King himself, yet his language 

CoiuuujuQ.^er gave offence and was not only tolerated but encouraged* 

AO'SSiiJfie works of Dionysius the Areopagite were at that time 

i, ^* /reatty esteemed in France, in consequence of the prevalent 

^ " opinion that they had been the productions of St. Denis the 

first Bishop of Paris. John having been well versed in the 

* The following epitaph composed by himself, had been engraved on his tomb : 
Hie ego Donatus Scotonim Sanguine cretus 
Solus in hoc tnmulo, pnlvere, verme, yoror. 
Begibus Italicis servivi pluribus annis, 
Lothario magno, Ludovico que bono* 
Octgnis luttris, septenit imuper annis 
Post Fesulana Presul in uibe fui. 
Graluita disctpulis dictabam Scripta libellis 
Schemata metroram, dicta beata senum. 
Farce viator adis, quisquis pro munera Christi 
Te modo non pigeat cemere busta roea, 
Atque precai-e Deum, residet quiculmina coeli, 
Ut mihi concedat regna beata sua. 

t Hist. Litteraire, T. V. 



216 

Greek language was accoi*dingly employed by Charles to 
translate into Latin, the four books of Dionysius. This 
translation, which has been much admired, appeared in 860, 
and was dedicated to the King.* At this time John taught 
philosophy in Paris ; his lectures were attended by a great 
concourse of scholars and, as Brucker remarks, the system 
which he adopted was that of the new Platonists of the 
Alexandrian schooL While he had been thus usefully en« 
gaged, the writbgs of the Monk Oothescale ga^e rise to 
a serious controversy among the French divines on the myste* 
rious doctrines of grace and predestination. Gothescale was 
supported by Prudentius Bishop of Troies, Remigius Arch- 
bishop of Lyons, Florus Archdeacon of the same city and 
many others; while he was opposed by numbers, among 
whom Hincmar Archbishop of Rheims and Rabanus Arch- 
bishop of Mentz were the moat distinguished. On this oc- 
casion, John was solicited by Hincmar and his party to com-> 
pose a treatise on predestination, This work was published 
about the year 850; in the composition of it Scotus Erigena 
was led astray by placing too great a dependance on Platonic 
principles, and he fell into a variety of errors. Among other 
absurdities, he advanced that sin and punishment •being 
mere privations cannot come under the divine prescience; 
that the torments of the damned are only the mere recoUectioa 
of their sins; that the damned will at length enjoy the beatific 
vision; that the irregular motions of the will may be liable to 
punishment, but that our nature itself cannot; and in short? 
that human nature is not liable to sin. As soon as this work 
which comprised nineteen chapters had made its appearance, 
it produced an extraordinary sensation throughout the Oallican 
Church, and was ably refuted by Prudentius, Florus and 
other divines.f It was formally condemned by the third 
Council of Valence in 855, and is represented as a mass of 

♦ Usher, Ep. Syll, N. 22. f FIcury, L. 4S, 49. 



217 

'* impertinent syllogiBms, containing inventions of the devil, 
rather than any proposition of fiuth;" The Council of Lan- 
gres, held in 859, confirmed this sentence, and in the same 
year the work was solemnly condemned by Pope Nicholas I.* 
About the same time his work on Natures was published, 
and here his philosophy led him into a maze of the most 
extravagant errors. This production, which had been written 
in form of a dialogue^ was divided into five books. He re- 
duces Nature into four classes or divisions:^ 1st, that which 
creates and is not created — ^2nd, that which creates and is 
created — 3rd, that which does not create and is created — 
4th, that which neither creates or is created. After a 
tedious and subtle discussion on the three first classes^ John 
in his fourth and fifth books attempts to explain how thfe 
created natures will at length return into the increated one. 
He teaches, that at the general resurrection the body of man 
1^11 be transformed into his soul; that the soul will pass into 
the primordial causes and these causes at length into God, 
and thus a period will arrive when there will be nothing but 
the Deity in existence. From these and similar absurdities 
an endless chain of the most extravagant errors are deduced, 
and among the rest he concludes that the wickedness and 
punishments of the damned will at some time have an end. — 
His book on the Eucharist was published about the year 
861.:}^ This work had been written principally with a view to 
impugn the system of Pascasius Radbertus relative to the 
mode of Christ's presence in the Eucharist. Neither Pasca- 
sius or any other man had then the impiety to question the 
real presence of Christ's body and blood in the Sacrament of 
the Altar. There had, however, been a controversy between 
Pascasius and others relative to the mode or manner of this 
presence. Pascasius held that the body of Christ is present 
in the blessed Eucharist in the very same form as it had been 

• Flewry, L. 49. f F. Paris, dissert., &c. X Hist. Littterair^, T. 5. 

2£ 



218 

on earth, and as it Buffered on the cross and rose from th^ 
dead. Heoce, according to him, the phrase true body 
meant a palpable body, such as our Saviour had during his 
mission on earth. On the other hand, many learned catholic 
divines, in treating on the doctrine of the Eucharist, maia- 
tained that the body and blood of Christ, although really 
and substantially present in the Sacrament, are not there in 
the manner or under the form of a body as understood and 
explained by Pascasius. Among the opponents of the Pas- 
casian system was John Scotus Erigena. In consequence of 
some peculiar teims employed by John in the composition of 
his work, and of a singular philosophical process of reason- 
ing, many persons had been led to consider the book as 
heterodox, and that its author had actually denied the real 
presence. But in this opinion they were most probably mis«- 
taken. In the first place, the controversy between John and 
Pascasius was not about the reality of Christ's body and 
blood in the Sacrament: that had been admitted by all. The 
question was (quoad modum existentiae) as to the mode or 
manner in which Christ was present. . Now this question 
.could not be decided nor could the controversy be sustained^ 
unless both parties had acknowledged the real presence. In 
short, the very fact of their arguing on the mode of existence 
necessarily implied that they both admitted the existence 
itself. It is, therefore, clear that had John Seotus, while 
engaged in this controversy, denied the real, substantial 
presence of Christ in the Sacrament, he would thereby be 
actually and in fact travelling out of the subject altogether, 
and his mode of reasoning would be unfair and unphilosophi- 
cal. Again, the real presence of Christ in the Sacrament 
was the doctrine of the whole Christian world at the time, 
and as even Mosheim (a protestant authority) testifies, there 
was no second opinion on the subject. Had Scotus, therefore, 
ventured to deny this universally believed and universally re- 
vered dogma, that moment there would have been a reclama- 



219 

tion and an outcry and he would have raised up the whole 
Christian world against him» As the mode of Christ's real 
presence in the Bucfaarist and the phrase true body in the 
Pofcoiian iense wene the points at issuey John might on such 
an occasion have made use of some of his scholastic, meta* 
physical terms, which to readers unacquainted with his style- 
of writing or manner of reasoning would appear not only 
obscure, but even hereticaL It is also worthy of remark, 
that Hincmar> who was the first to reclaim against this work 
on the Eucharist and had written to Charles the bald on the 
subject^ was unable to produce a single sentence or term 
firom it indicative of a denial of the real presence. Hincmai^ 
was a great ad? ocate for the Pascasian system, and it is by 
no means improbable that^ in his overheated zeal for thai 
opinion, he might have considered some part of the writings 
of his opponent if not heterodox, at least dangerous and 
savouring of heresy. At all events, John's previous work on 
predestination was calculated to dast a shade of suspicion 
on many of his future productions, and particularly on such 
as embraced deep and mysterious subjects. But had John 
Scotus Erigena even denied the doctrine of the real presence, 
it is self-evident that in so doing, he would be advancing an 
unheard of novelty — one to which the Christian world was a 
stranger, and alike repugnant to the creed of his forefathers 
and to the universal belief of the Irish Church at that period.^ 
This book on the Eucharist was condemned by the Council of 
VercelU in 1060, since which time the copies have gradually 
ditoppeared and the work is now lost John was also the 
author of a variety of other works. He wrote on the im«- 
maculate mysteries of the Faith, against infidels — a Treatise 
on the vision of God — Paraphrastical tomes for the instruc* 
tion of youth— the Opinions of Philosophers — Epistles and 
Homilies— *seven Latin Poems intermixed with Greek lines— ^ 

* See Appendix, I. 



220 

a book on the Canons of Azachel — the Excerpta among the 
writings of Macrobius, touching the differences and agree- 
ment of the Greek and Latin Syntax — a translation of the 
Greek Scholia of St. Maximus on the difficult passages of St. 
Gregory Nazianzen.* Considering the age in which he lived, 
John Scotus Erigena was without doubt a man of most ex- 
tensive erudition. He was a very superficial theologian, but 
his knowledge of Mathematics, Philosophy and the classics 
together with his powerful talents and wit rendei'ed him one 
of the most learned men and the greatest genius of the age. 
He finished his education before he left his native country, 
from which circumstance we may readily infer to what an ex- 
tent the cause of literature had been carried in Ireland during 
the ninth and preceding centuries. The Irish had been con- 
sidered, long before this period, as tne most eminent teachers 
in Europe^ and ecclesiastical literature being that which waa 
principally cultivated, their theological system became gra- 
dually digested and methodized, and in process of time 
formed the basis of what has been since called scholastic 
theology. John became acquainted with the system of this 
scholastic divinity in Ireland, and was certainly the first who 
blended its principles with the doctrines of mystic theology. 
It has been asserted that he was coippelled to leave France 
and had taken shelter in England during the reign of Alfred 
the Great. This, however, is a misstatement, and besides 
the anachronism which it implies, remains unsupported by 
any sufficient authority. John Scotus Erigena died in France 
during the reign of his patron, Charles the bald, and about 
the year 874.t 

So great was the number of learned men and of zealous 
missionaries who in those times had repaired even to France 
alone, that Heric of Auxerre, in a letter which he addressed 
to the French King, says: — "Why do I speak of Ireland — 

• Hist. Litter.— Ware, Writers. 
t Mabilloa Annal, Ben. Tom 3.— UisU Lilter at Eiigena 



221 

that whole nation almost despising the danger of the sea 
repair to our coasts, with a numerous train of philosophers 
and holy men ; the most famous of whom bidding adieu to their 
native soil account themselved' happy under your favour, as 
the servants of the wise Solomon/' Thus it was that the 
persecutions of the Danes became an instrument, under Pro^ 
vidence, for the greater extension of the Gospel; and Irish 
ecclesiastics, after having established religion at home, went 
forth, the teac^hers and apostles of Qth^r natipns, 



:j 



CHAPTER IL 

SuccusoTi of St. Patrick— Episeopal Seu^Rd^wui 
Fcutidationa of the Ifinth Cmtuty. 

The Metropolitan See of Armagh had bean governed 
during the ninth century by twelve Prelates in unbroken sue* 
cession. Conm aoh, whose incumbency continued for sixteen 
years, died in 807, and had as successors Forbach and 
NuAD, the latter of whom after having made a visitation of 
Connaught died in 812, and was succeeded by Flavous son 
of LQngsech, This Prelate governed the See for thirteen 
years. During the latter part of his incumbency (in 833) he 
ftpi^ars to have been assisted by Artrioius or Artry, whom 
^ome have ranked as coadjutor to Flangus in the administra- 
tion of the Archdiocess of Armagh,* In the year 823 Artri- 
gins made a visitation of the Province of Munster, during 
which, as the Ulster Annals relate. ''The law of St. Patrick 
vms propagated throughout Munster by Feidhlim son of 
Crimthan King of Munster and Artrigius Bishop of Armagh." 
Owing to the general confusion which accompanied the incur- 
sions of the Danes, the metropolitan rights of the See of 
Armagh had been in some places disregarded. The enforce- 
ment of these rights and the re-establishment of what was 
then termed the law of St. Patrick, were the principal objects 
of this provincial visitation. About the middle of the eighth 
century and during the reign of Hugh OUain, King of all 
Ireland, arrangements had been made for augmenting the 
revenues belonging to the Metropolitan See of Armf^h, and 
a law had been actually passed for that specific purpose.t 

• Tr. Th. p. 294.— O'Flaherty. t Keating, B. 2. p. 47. 



223 

Tirdaglas in Onnond is the place in which this measure is 
said to hare been first concerted. Although the primatial 
rights of Armagh were indisputably acknowledged over all 
Ireland, and the See had long before that period ^oyed 
ample possessions, nevertheless, Hugh Ollain, with a view 
of advancing the dignity of the- Metropolitan chair, engaged 
to have a law passed, according to which each of the four 
Provinces were to be taxed and the fund thence arising was 
to be applied as a supplemental revenue to the ancient pos^ 
sessions of the See of Armagh. Accordingly an interview 
took place at Tirdaglas between that Monarch and Cathal 
Mac Fingin,* King of Munster, and in this conference, at 
which likewise many of the clergy and several of the dynasts 
had attended, the measures contemplated and proposed by 
Hugh Ollain were readily adopted, and were from this time 
enfoi'ced as a regular national tributary enactment. This is 
the law which Artrigius, in his visitation through Munster, 
intended to vindicate, and in ccmsequence of his having been 
obliged to employ the cooperation of the King Feidhlim, it 
may be easily imagined that the task was, at least in some 
places, attended with no very inconsiderable embarrassment* 
The enactment of such a. measure was, at all events, a meU 
ancholy event for the Church of Ireland — ^it formed a union 
pregnant with woe and was the fruitful source of great pub* 
lie scandal — of heavy and grievous calamities. Before this 
connexion with the temporal power had been thought of, the 
Church of Armagh was tranquil and prosperous. While her 
Prelates, depending on the liberaUty of the people and satis^ 
fied with the blessings of a moderate competency, had kept 
themselves disengaged from the cares which always follow in 
the train of boundless opulence, her aiiairs went on well and 
religion was rapidly advancing; but once that See became 
inundated with the annual tide of a national revenue, that 
moment the wreck commenced — ^the storm rolled on with re- 
doubled violence and all her ancient glory and greatness were 



224 

lost in the darkness and fury of the tempest. The powerful 
facts which may serve to illustrate the truth of this obsei-va- 
tion are to be found in the succeeding century; nor indeed is 
there a necessity for referring to a period so distant, while the 
very proceedings of Artrigius himself may be likely to aff<»d 
an abundant exemplification. On the death of Flangus in 
826, Eugene, Abbot of Armagh, was unanimously elected 
his successor and was immediately after Consecrated in the 
Cathedral Church.* The promotion of Eugene, besides being 
canonical, was moreovel* a subject of great satisfaction to 
both clergy and people. Artrigius, however, could not be 
prevailed upon to view these proceedings in the same agreeable 
light. During his visitation in Munster and the other 
Provinces, the valuable revenue which the law provided had 
been placed in his hands, and being a man of influence and 
intrigue, he soon found means of seizing on the See and of 
having Eugene its legitimate Bishop removed. Artrigius en- 
joyed the benefits of his unjust usurpation but two years; for 
in 828 he was deposed, and Eugene was replaced in the 
Archiepiscopal chair.f The incumbency of this Prelate con- 
tinued until 834. On his death Farannan was elected and 
consecrated Archbishop of Armagh. During the administra- 
tion of this Prelate, the Danes made frightful ravages all over 
Ireland; Armagh, however, appears to have been marked 
out as the principal object of their vengeance. In 849 that 
City was taken by storm, the Primate Farannan with many of 
his clergy fell into the hands of the Danes, while great num- 
bers of the students and of the religious were expelled Armagh 
or put to death.l The life of the Primate was, however, 
spared, and having been allowed to take with him some few 
of his attendants, together with the Church relics, he was 
committed to the custody of a strong guard and sent off to 
the Danish fleet then lying at Limerick. The Metropolitan 

♦ O'Flahcrty ad Tr. Th. p. 294. f Four Masters. t Ind. Chron. - 



225 

See was not permitted to remain long without a presiding 
pastor: immediately after the expulsion of the Primate Faran- 
nan^ D^rmit OTigbrnach was consecrated and continued to 
direct the ecclesiastical administration of the Archdiocess for 
four years. The cause of religion and of morality would 
have been considerably promoted under the Primate Dermit, 
had his incumbency been attended with any interval of order 
or tranquillity. He was a man of literature, a great encour- 
iager of learning, and is styled in the Ulster Annals: — '^The 
Wisest of all the Doctors in Europe." During his time the 
Danes broke into Armagh on Easter Sunday — every thing 
both sacred and human became now one scene of desolation — 
the temple and the sanctuary as well as the habitations of 
tnan were laid waste, while the Primate afflicted at these re- 
peated calamities, languished for a time and died the same 
year, 862.* The successor of Dermit was Factna, whose 
incumbency continued for twenty-two years. Nor was the 
administration of this Prelate attended with repose. During 
his time, Auliffe the Norwegian sacked and burned Armagh 
on which occasion the churches were again plundered and one 
thousand persons perished. Factna died in 874, and had as 
successors, Akmirb, Cathasach, Mac-Crunnyail and 
Mablbrigid, the last of whom was of the royal house of 
Niall, and was consecrated A. D. 886.t This Prelate ranked 
among the roost distinguished men of those times, and so 
great was his reputation for piety and learning, that he has 
been called "the head of religion in this countiy,'^ and is 
numbered among the saints of Ireland. He died on the 22nd 
of February, A. D. 926, after having governed the Metropo- 
litan See of Armagh for forty years.J Thus was the succes- 
sion preserved in this ancient and venerable See — and alth6ugh 
the City of Armagh had been several times plundered and the 
kingdom from one extremity to the other had become a con- 

* Usher, Ind. Chron. f Psalttr of Cashel. t Ulster AnnaU. 

2 F 



226 

iinued scene of terror and confusion, the chair of St. Patrick 
was, nevertheless, regularly filled with zealous and eminent 
men — and the same grand and unbroken succession continued 
in triumphant order during the subsequent centuries^ as shall 
be seen in its proper place. 

The catalogue of the episcopal Sees received no augmenta-' 
tion in this age: while the bishoprics which had been estab- 
lished were directed by an uninterrupted succession of learned 
and vigilant pastors. Almost all the acts of these men have 
perished amid the continued wars with which the country had, 
in those times, been visited; and if we may except the 
diocesses of Armagh, Emly and Kildare, the very names of 
the incumbents have not been, in any regular order, handed 
down to us. In the See of Emly^ the succession has been 
faithfully recorded. Emly was not, as some have ground- 
lessly asserted^ an Archiepiscopal See, nor did that distinctive 
title appertain to any bishopric in Ireland in those times^ save 
to that of Armagh. In consequence of its great antiquity 
and the high veneration in which the memory of its founder 
had been held, Emly obtained a sort of distinctive precedency, 
but it cannot be said to have ever enjoyed any thing likQ 
canonical archiepiscopal jurisdiction. This See was governed 
in 825 by the celebrated Olchobair Mac-Kinede. During his 
incumbency, Feidlim the King of Munster died, after having 
atoned for the scandalous enormities of his life by a rigorous 
course of penance. On the death of this King, Olchobair 
put forward his claims to the sceptre of Munster, and being a 
man of influence and address he succeeded and found himself 
placed on the throne of that warlike Province.* Olchobair is 
the first of our Irish princes in whose person we find the 
sceptre and the mitre united. This royal Prelate besides his 
love of country was of an enterprising and martial disposition; 
qualities which the state of the nation and the circumstances 

* Annals of Innbfallen. 



227 

o( the times soon called into action. About the year 848, 
the Danes committed frightful destruction all over Munster. — 
citiesy towns and villages were stormed and plundered, while 
numbers of the inhabitants were put to the sword> without 
distinction of age, sex or condition* Olchobair could no 
longer remain a passive spectator of such cruelties — he ac- 
cordingly summoned his forces and haying been assisted by 
Lorcan^ King of Leinster, this Prelate met the Danes and 
gave them battle at a place called Sei-naght in the territory of 
the Decies. After an obstinate engagement the Irish troops 
claimed the victory; the Danes were routed in all directions 
and twelve hundred of their bravest men were slain on the 
field of battle.* Olchobair encouraged by this signal victory 
was determined to pursue the enemy; while the Danes, 
recovering from the shock which this signal defeat had occa- 
sioned, were reinforced by detachments of their countrymen 
from Limerick, Dublin and other quarters. The Irish troops, 
headed by the Dalgais, lost no time in coming up to the in- 
vaders, and within the space of three days two desperate 
engagements took place in which seventeen hundred of the 
Danes and many of their leaders were cut off. These repeated 
victories spread dismay among the Danish troops, while 
Olchobair pursued the disordered and retreating enemy; nor 
did he cease until he had finally routed them beyond the 
frontiers of his kmgdom. It was most fortunate for the 
Momonians that Olchobair had been their Prince at this 
crisis — ^had they been governed by a less vigorous or intelli- 
gent monarch, the Danes would no doubt have gained a 
footing in their country, and the ancient throne of Munster 
would ere long be at the mercy and disposal of these invaders. 
The reign of Olchobair was but of short continuance. He 
died in 850 and was succeeded by Mane-Confelad, who, like 
his predecessor, possessed at the same time, both the chair of 
Emly and the throne of Munster.f 

• Ware's Antiq. f Annals of Innisfallen. 



228 

In the See of Kildare^ the order of succession is also com- 
plete^ but, as has been observed, the acts of these Prelates 
have perished* The most eminent men in this catalogue were 
^dgen, OTionnachta and Scannal,* the first of whom is 
generally styled, scribe, bishop and anchorite of Kildare; 
and the latter two are marked as Samts in the Irish calendars. 
Among the Prelates of Clonmacnois in those times was the 
learned Corbre or Corpreus. T)ie reputation of this Prelate 
had been so great that he was universally called, '^the head 
of the religious of all the Irish in this age/' His death oc- 
curred on the 6th of March, A. D. 900, the annirersary of 
which was for many years celebrated as a festival at Clon- 
macnois.f The See of Clogher had at the close of the ninth 
century been placed under the jurisdiction of Alild, a learned 
Prelate. He is marked in the Ulster Annals as scribe. Abbot 
and Bishop of Clogher, and died 898. At this period, likewise, 
the See of Glendaloch was governed by the learned Dungal 
Mac-Baithen; and Ossory by Cormac, who is generally 
styled, scribe. Abbot and Bishop of Saigar 

The history of the monastic institutions present an exact 
coincidence with that of the episcopal sees of the ninth cen- 
tury. During the confusion of these times, when both cloister 
and sanctuary were profaned, it could not be expected that 
any new monastic establishments had been founded. Some 
few might have been erected in those sequestered districts into 
which the Danish forces had not penetrated, but they were of 
minor consequence and were merely cells belonging to the 
great foundations of the preceding centuries. The religious 
establishments of Ireland had been the leading objects of 
attack during these times. From their extent and appearance 
the Danes had been led to expect immense booty, but being 
afterwards disappointed, and meeting with nothing in the 
cloister wherewith to gratify their avarice, they accordingly 

* Wai«*8 Bbhops. f A. A. S. S. at 6th March. 



229 

vented their fury on the altar, the temple and the libraries, 
and thus many of the records of the kingdom and other 
monuments of antiquity which would serve to throw light on 
the history of those ages had been consigned to the flames 
and perished for ever. The Monasteries which appear to have 
suffered most were Armagh, Kildare, Clonmacnois, Bangor, 
Ferns, Louth and Kells. During the course of this century 
Armagh had been eleven times pillaged and laid waste, while 
in 873 one thousand of the clergy and people were slaughtered 
and the city was almost reduced to ashes.* Within the same 
space of time the great Monastery of Kildare had been six 
times profaned. The greatest destruction seems to have 
taken place in 836, when two Danish fleets arrived, one in 
the Lifiey and the other in the Boyne. They not only laid 
waste every church and abbey within the territories of Magh- 
liffe and Magh-Breagh, but also destroyed Kildare with fire 
and sword, and carried away the rich shrines of St. Brigid 
and St. Conlaeth.f In Bangor, Ferns, Louth and Kells the 
same work of destruction had been carried on, while Clon- 
xnacnois seemed in a particular manner to have been singled 
out as the special object of their vengeance. 
. Such were the frightful circumstances in which the religious^ 
institutions of Ireland had at this time been placed. Provi- 
dence, however, had ulterior objects in view, and in the 
accomplishment of them, these religious communities (it will 
be seen) were the principal and most effectual instruments. 

• Tr. Th. p. 296. t O'Hallaran, vol. II. 



CHAPTER IIL 

Reliffious and Literary Characters of the Ninth Century-^ 
General Observations. 

St. Abkous, the celebrated author of the Festilogiunif 
flourished in the commencemeat of the ninth century and was 
descended from the illustrious chieftains of Dalaradia. The 
Monastery of Cloneni^h had in this age been eminently distin- 
guished both for its discipline and the number of learned teach- 
ers with which it had been supplied. To this retreat Aengus 
repaired, and having embraced its institute he applied himself 
with great diligence for several years to the study of the holy 
Scriptures. Wishing, however, to avoid the applause which 
his learning had now elicited, he withdrew to the Monastery 
of Tallagh which at that time had been governed by the pious 
and learned Moelruan. Here the merits of Aengus soon be- 
came known; he taught the Scriptures for many years in the 
schools of that Monastery and assisted Moelruan in com- 
pleting the celebrated martyrology of Tallagh. He soon 
after published his Festilogium or calendar of the principal 
saints written in Irish verse and taken chiefly from the mar- 
tyrology.* Aengus, is also the author of the work called Sal- 
tuir-na-raan, or Multipartite Psalter, divided into five books. 
The first book contains the names of 345 bishops, 299 priests 
and abbots and 78 deacons; the second book treats of those 
saints who were called by the same name^ and is entitled 
" Of Homonymous Saints f the third book or " The Book of 
Sons and Daughters/' gives the history of those saints who 
had been born of the same parents; the fourth book contains 

• A. A. S. S.p. 681. 



231 

the maternal genealogy of more than 200 Irish saints; and 
the fifth comprises a variety of litanies, in which a great num- 
ber of saints are invoked, among whom are mentioned several 
Italian, Gallic, British, and African saints who had lived 
and died in Ireland."* Aengus published likewise a second 
Saltuir»na-raan, written in verse and containing a beautiful 
history of the Old Testament-f After the death of St. Moel- 
ruan^ Aengus removed to Clonenagh and was raised to the 
episcopal dignity. He died about the year 819 and his festi- 
val was observed on the 11th of March. 

St. FiNDAN or Fintan was a native of Leinster, and when a 
young man was seized upon by a party of the Danes, who 
conveyed him to their vessels and soon after departed from 
Ireland. Having arrived at the Orkneys, these pirates were 
obliged to put to shore, while Findan by concealing himself 
among the rocks escaped out of their hands. At this time 
Findan resolved on spending the remainder of his days in 
holy pilgrimage. Having encountered a variety of difficulties 
he arrived at length in France and proceeded from thence to 
Rome and ultijnately to Switzerland. Here he became a 
monk in the Monastery of Rhingaw, now Rheinau, and remained 
for five years in the most strict observance of its institute^: — 
Findan was anxious to embrace a life of still greater austerity. 
For this purpose he retired to a cell not far distant, in which 
be spent twenty-two years secluded from the society of man; 
practising in the mean time the most extraordinary acts of 
mortification. It is stated in his acts that this Saint had been 
favoured with several visions, especially on the feasts of St. 
Patrick and St. Columba, and so profound was the venera- 
tion in which he had been held, that the members of the an- 
cient establishment of Rheinau adopted him as their patron.§ 
Findan died in this holy retreat about the year 827, and his 
festival is observed on the 15 th of November. 

• A. A. S. S. p. 539. t Id. p. 582. t Id. p. 355. $ MabUlon. Anna!. 



232 

St. Blaithmac was a descendant of the Southern Nialla 
and heir to a principality. When a yoong man he felt an 
ardent desire of consecrating himself to religion, but his in* 
tention was by no means agreeable to the wishes of his pa* 
rents. At length, however, he withdrew from the world and 
embraced the monastic state. His burning zeal and extra- 
ordinary labours were mostly directed to the conversion of the 
Danes, and under providence he was the chosen instrument 
of collecting great numbers of them to the faith of Christ. — 
About the year 820, he repaired to Hy, at which time a party 
of the Ostmen had made a descent on the island. Blaith- 
mac, already filled with an ardent desire of receiving the 
crown of martyrdom, awaited their arrival, and was in the act 
of celebrating the sacred mysteries when they had entered the 
church. The Danes demanded the shrine which contained 
the holy remains of St. Columba, and upon his refusal they 
instantly put him to death. The martyrdom of St. Blaithmac 
occui!red on the 19th of January, A.D. 824*. 

Helias, an Irishman and a disciple of Theodulf, Bishop 
of Orleans, distinguished himself in France during the reign 
of Charles the Bald, and afterwards became Bishop of An- 
gouleme. This eminent Prelate ranked among the learned 
men of the age and for many years presided in the schools of 
France as professor of the sacred Scriptures. Among his 
scholars was the celebrated Heric of Auxerre.f Helias, when 
Bishop of Angouleme, assisted in 862 at the Synod of Pistes, 
and in 866 at that of Soissons. Helias died on the 22nd of 
September, A.D. 876. 

MoENGAL or Marcellus, flourished about the middle of the 
ninth cenfury. He travelled to Rome in 841 accompanied by 
his nephew Marcus, an Irish Bishop, and afterwards visited 
the ancient Monastery of St. Grail in Switzerland. This es- 
tablishment had been long celebrated for its schools of theol- 

• A. A, S. S. at 19lh Jan. t Labbe, Nov. Bib. T. 2. 



233 

ogy^ and as soon as the learning of Mpengal had become 
known to the fathers of the house, they requested him to 
remain with them. Here he delivered theological lectures 
for many years and among his disciples are reckoned Notker 
BalbuluSy Ratpert^ and Tutilo.* He has written a comment-* 
ary on the Scriptures and homilies on the lessons of the Gos- 
pel.f Moengal died in that Monastery on the 30th of Sep-* 
tcmber, but the year has not been recorded. 

GiLDAS, whose parents had been Irish, was born in Wales 
about the year 820. At an early age he repaired to Ireland, 
.where he received his education and according to some writers 
he embraced the monastic institute of Bangor. His know- 
ledge of the Scriptures and of mystic theology rendered him 
one of the most eminent men of the day. According to 
Bale, Gildas published a work called the Breviary of Gildas, 
with this exordium, "from the beginning of the world to the 
flood;" a book on the Wonders of Britain; a book on King 
Arthur; a treatise entitled, "De Esse Periculoso;" a book 
on his unknown sepulchre. He published likewise a work 
entitled '^De Computo," which is in manuscript in the Cot- 
tonian Library and consists of ninety-nine chapters. This 
work he dedicated to the celebrated monk Raban, afterwards 
Bishop of Fulda.:{: The year in which Gildas died is not 
known, nor are any of his works extant, save a manuscript 
of the last mentioned treatise. 

The Abbot Patrick may be ranked among the number of 
those ecclesiastics who about the year 850 fled from the fury 
of the Danes and retired to England. It is most probable 
that Patrick had been a Bishop before he retired from Ireland, 
and it has been generally supposed that he was the same as 
Moel-Patrick, styled Bishop, Anchorite and Abbot elect of 
Armagh. At all events, Patrick on his arrival in Eng- 
land repaired to the Abbey of Glastonbury, where he re- 

• Mabillon. Acta. Ben. p. 462. f Tlarris' Writers. ^ A. A. S. S. p. 202. 

2 G 



234 

mained until bis death. This circumstance gave rise to the 
glaring absurdity of some writers, who confounding this 
Patrick with the Apostle of Ireland attempted to maintain 
that St. Patrick had died in England, and bad been buried 
in Glastonbury. The Abbot Patrick has published a book of 
homilies, several religious tracts and some epistles to his 
countrymen.* 

Besides these eminent characters, there remains a catalogue 
of others whose acts have completely perished. Among these 
may be noticed Sedulius, Abbot of Kildare in 829, and author 
of the Commentaries on the Epistles of St. Paul; Luacharen, 
Professor and Scribe of Glonmacnois; Aidus, Scribe of Ros- 
common; Martin, Scribe of Devenish; Dubtach, Scribe of 
Kill-acbaid, County of Cavan; Robartach, Scribe of Dur- 
row and an exact Chronographer; Torpadius, an eminent 
Scripturian of Tallagh; O'Kearta, a Philosopher and Scribe 
of Kill-achaid; Domnald, Theologian and Professor of Cork; 
Moel- Patrick, Scribe of Trevet; Suibhne, Scribe and Pro* 
fessor of Clonmacnois and a host of others, whose solitary 
names stand recorded m the melancholy annals of these 
frightful times. 

Considering the repeated attacks which had been made on 
the literary institutions of the country, the wonder is, that 
even so great a portion of our ancient records have been pre- 
served. During these awful times, the plunder of the cloister 
was sure to be followed by the profanation of the sanctuary; 
the writings and learned monuments of antiquity were con- 
signed to the flames, while the professor and the student, al- 
ready marked out for destruction, either fell by the sword of 
the infidel or were obliged to consult their safety and fly 
from the storm. Those venerable monastic foundations of 
former days having been once upset, the cultivation of letters 
began to decline, ecclesiastical discipline was impaired, in 

• Ware Writcr>. 



285 

shorty every thing human or deriving its source from man 
appeared crumbling as it were into one general ruin; while 
the Church alone with its sacred deposit remained immove- 
able and even majestic amid the darkness of the tempest in 
which it had been enveloped. Hence the civil and ecclesias- 
tical events of the nmth century afford a powerful moral de- 
monstration of the weakness and uncertainty of all those 
things which owe their origin to the ingenuity of man. The 
sacred founder of the Christian religion drew a broad line of 
distinction between the essential doctrines which he himself 
had revealed, and those disciplinary usages which eminent 
and holy men might in after ages introduce into his Church. 
The eternal building itself he erected upon a rock, and we 
are assured that even the gates of hell shall never prevail 
against it. Schisms and heresies may spring up — persecu- 
tions may arise — the sword may be drawn and the reign of 
terror commence— whole nations may be invaded — the taber- 
nacle polluted — ^the sanctuary plundered, and the temple it- 
self levelled to the ground ; nevertheless, in the midst of this 
general wreck, and while altar and sanctuary and temple and 
kingdom aie involved in one common mass of ruin, the 
Church of Christ will stand firm, solid, and unshaken. 

There exists, therefore, a very material difference between 
the Church with its articles of faith, and mere disciplinary 
human institutions. The former can never be destroyed* 
whereas the latter is liable both to decay and destruction. — 
Now, of this latter class were the monastic foundations: they 
had, no doubt, been established upon the maxims and coun- 
sels of the Gospel, and their object was to advance the glory 
of God and to secure the salvation of man. Nevertheless, 
they were human institutions, contemplated, organized, and 
perfected by eminent and holy men, sanctioned and confirmed 
by the Church, and ultimately recommended both by their 
intiinsic merits and by the number of distinguished ecclesias- 



236 

tics whom they sent forth to instruct the faithful^ or to plant 
the Cross of Christ in the land of the distant unbeliever. 

While the historical events of the ninth century may 
serve to furnish an awful record of the persecutions which 
the religious establishments of Ireland had undergone at 
that period; it must be recollected, that these bad been 
the establishments which for i^es had poured forth such 
an host of missionaries over Europe and rendered the name 
of their country so justly celebrated. Scarcely had the. 
light of Christianity beamed on Ireland, when these apos- 
tolic men went forth : the Appenines were blessed by one,* 
the Hebrides were hallowed by another ;t while Rumold 
planted the cross in Mecklin, the plains of Franconia were 
consecrated with the blood of Kilian. Donatus was re- 
vered in Tuscany; Virgilius was venerated in Saltzbui^: 
Clemens shed the light of knowledge on France, Albinus 
lit up the lamp of science in Italy. The desart and the 
city, the hamlet and the palace, the mountain and its 
caverns, the> valley and its loveliness, the nortli with its 
eternal snow, the south with its burning sun — all Europe 
was embraced by Irish missionaries. Their learning was 
acknowledged — their sanctity was revered — their virtues 
were canonized — their patronage was solicited, and their 
name and their memory are to this day cherished and 
honourably recorded in many of the most distinguished 
cities and nations of this vast and powerful Continent. — 
With justice, therefore, did Benedict XIV. thus address 
the archbishops and bishops of Ireland, in his memorable 
epistle to that venerable body, A.D. 1741. ''Recollect 
(writes the Pontiff,) the laboui*s of your great Apostle, St* 
Patrick, whom our predecessor St. Celestine had sent 
amongst you. Let not the exalted virtues of St. Malachy 
be forgotten; nor the sanctity and trials of St. Laurence 

• Columbanu*. t Columbkili. 



237 

of Dublin be obliterated from your memory. But should 
we be inclined to enumerate all the holy men, Columba- 
nusy Kilian^ Virgilius, Rumold, Gallus, and a countless 
host of others, who forsaking the land of their birth 
planted the Catholic faith in other nations, or served to 
render it glorious and triumphant by their blood, we should 
certainly encounter a task which would far . exceed the 
limits of this epistle. Suffice it, therefore, briefly to point 
out those few, in order that ye may the more readily bring 
to your recollection the piety, the religion, and the great 
and exalted sanctity of your illustrious forefathers."''^ 

•SeeCtiit.XVIlI.c.1. 



TENTH CENTURY. 

CHAPTER I. 

Congall IL Monarch of Ireland^ repeU the invaders — The 
Danes of Dublin embrace the Christian faith — CormaCy 
King of Munster and first Bishop of Cashel, slain in the 
Battle of Ballymoon — Effects of the Danish Wars — Mo* 
nopoly of the See of Armagh — Irishmen teach at Glaston- 
bury — Irish Missionaries on the Gmtinent — History of 
St. Maccallin and of St. Fingen — Establishments con^ 
ducted by Irish Ecclesiastics in various parts of Europe. 

Notwithstanding the frightful aspect which the affairs of 
Ireland had at this period assumed, both from division among 
her own people and from the irruptions of the Danes, the 
religion of the nation was faithfully and firmly upheld. — 
Since the memorable engagement of Tirconnel, A.D. 896, in 
which the Danes suffered a dreadful defeat, the Norwegian 
power appears to have been gradually declining in Ireland.* 
This signal victory was followed by others, still more encour- 
aging to the Irish and disastrous to the Danes. In 902 im- 
mense slaughter had been made amongst them by the people 
of Leinster. Finnian, Prince of Bregh, a territory stretch- 
ing from Dublin to Drogheda, marched at the head of his 
forces, and after routing the Danes of Dublin, ultimately 
expelled them the country; while the Lagenians, under the 
command of Carrol, obliged them to quit the southern parts 
of that Province. The Danes would never have ventured to 
renew their incursions, had the princes of Ireland acted in 

* Annals of Innufal. 



239 

concert with each other. These Irish leaders had been guilty 
of a still greater piece o£ impolicy in employing the very 
enemy as soldiers in their armies during their unfortqjiiate con- 
flicts with each other. Of this the Danes were sufficiently 
convinced^ and accordingly^ after having been routed from 
Dublin, they repaired without delay to the north of Europe, 
for the purpose of acquainting their countrymen with the im- 
portance of the enterprize, and of strengthening their ranj^s 
by additional reinforcements. They continued year after 
year to pour into the country, but particularly in 914, when a 
large detachment landed atWaterford, and soon after laid 
waste Cork, Lismore, and Aghaboe. From this period down 
to the time of Donagh II., King of Ireland in 940, the Danes 
having been constantly reinforced from their own country de- 
vastated Leighlin, Kells, Armagh, Kildare, Clonmacnois,* 
Slane, Down, Clonard, Bangor, Ferns, and Ossory* At 
length in 941, the celebrated Callaghan Cashel, at the head of 
the forces of Munster, defeated the Danes in two engagements^ 
one in the country of the Decies and the other in Ossory. — 
Congall II. was then King of Ireland: this Monarch witness- 
ing the repeated disasters to which the nation had been so 
long exposed, raised a powerful army among the people of 
Bregh and assisted by Bran Mac-Maolmordha and his Lage- 
nians advanced towards Dublin, which City he took by storm. 
However, in the following year, upon the reduction of Con- 
gall's army, the Danes returned under their King, Blacar, 
and once more made themselves masters of Dublin. Con- 
gall renewed the attack, and in 948 another desperate en- 
gagement took place, in which the Danish King, Blacar, and 
a thousand of his men were slain.f Upon the death of Bla- 
car, Godfrid, son of Sitric King of Northumberland,, was 
appointed ruler of the Northmen* This continued series of 
disasters so humbled the Danes of Dublin, that during the 

* Annals of lonisfal. t 1«1« 



240 

remainder of Congali's reign few depredations had been com* 
mitted, and it iB, moreover, considered one of the ordinary 
means by which the conversion of that people to the Christian 
religion had been effected. Oodfrid, their King, had em« 
braced Christianity long before he was elevated to any author* 
ity by the Danes in Ireland. When his father Sitric had 
married Editha, the sister of Athelstan King of England> 
oue of the conditions of the marriage was, that he should 
become a Christian.* Sitric had three sons, Ranald/ Au* 
liffe, and Godfrid, all of whom had been instructed by Edi- 
tha in the principles of the Christian religion. It is stated by 
Ware and others, upon the authority of the Annals of Innis- 
fallen, that the general conversion of the Danes throughout 
Ireland took place at this period (948). Such, however, is 
not the fact; and it is remarkable, that the annalist in stating 
the conversion which occurred in 948 confines himself solely 
to the Danes of Dublin; which doubtless he would not have 
done had the Northmen in other parts of Ireland become 
Christians at that time.f It is certain that the conversion of 
that people did not become general until many years after, 
and so far was it from having been an instantaneous event, 
that it was even a work of much difficulty and of many 
years. 

The civil as well as the ecclesiastical events connected vrith 
the memory of Cormac Mac Culinan, King of Munster and 
first Bishop of Cashel, form an interesting portion of the 
history of those times. From this celebrated man is dated 
the foundation of that Bishopric, and from the circumstance 
of the City of Cashel having been the seat of royalty in the 
south and the residence of the kings of Munster, it was ex- 
alted in the twelfth century to the dignity of an Archiepis- 
copal See. Cormac was bom in the year 837, and was of 
the Eugenian branch, being lineally descended from ^nguse, 

• Murrey, de Col. Scandiscis. f Annal, Innisfal. A. 948. 



^41 

who had been converted to the faith by the preaching of St. 
Patrick. Having received an education suited to the eccle- 
siastical state under Snegdus, the learned Abbot of Castle- 
dermoty Gormac was «idmitted to holy orders and after a 
period was promoted to the episcopacy.* It is conjectured 
that he had been Bishop of Lismore before he removed to 
Gashel; however^ the probability h, that in consideration of 
his learning and extfaordiaary meritSy he was consecrated 
originally Bishop of Oashel and «oon after established his 
see in that city which had been for so many years the resi*- 
dence of his royal ancestors. Kinngeagan, who then swayed 
the sceptre of that Province^ having incurred the displeasure 
of his subjects^ was deposed in 901; on which occasion Gor^ 
-mac WW called to the throne by the unanimous voice of the 
people^ and thus was he both Bishop of Gashel and King of 
Munster. The union of the mitre and sceptre was not un- 
usual in those times, particularly among the ancestors of 
Cormac. Olchobair who died in S5l and Giufeled in 872^ 
had been Kings of Munster and Bishops of Emly. 

In the very commencement of Cormac's reign, and while h^ 
was governing his kingdom in peace^ Flan> surnamed Sionmi, 
King of all Ireland, together with Cearbhal, King of Leinster> 
marched with a powerful army into Munster and laid waste 
the whole territory between Gowran and Limerick* Cormac, 
who wafi at this time unprepared to resist such an attack, 
had been obliged to remain a passive spectator of these 
scenes; however, in the following year, he collected together 
the forces a( Munster and having been accompanied by Fla- 
hertach. Abbot of Inniscatthy, he directed his march towards 
the County of Meath, for the purpose of demanding satisfac- 
tion for the injuries which his people had sustained and of 
preventing a recurrence of such unwarranted proceedings.t 
It would have been more fortunate for Cormac, had he paid 

* Annal. Innwfal. see c» II, t Wain's Antiq. Four Masters. 

2 H 



242 

less implicit attfention to the advice of Flahertach. This 
man was naturally of a bold, enterprizing, military dispo* 
sition; and by his counsel Cormac was at length prevailed 
upon to come to an engagement with the enemy. Having 
arrived with his troops as far as the plains of Magh-leana, 
in the now King's County, Cormac gave battle to Flan and 
his confederates and defeated them vrith great loss, particu* 
larly of the Nialls, among whom Mciolchraobha, King of 
Kinel-Eogain (Tyrone) was slain. Reduced by this defeat. 
Flan was compelled to submit, while Cormac continued his 
route towards Connaught and obliged the Conacians and 
some of the Nialls to place hostages in his haqds.* It was 
not to be expected that Flan, who besides his un^vemable 
temper was also Monarch of the kingdom, could long sub- 
mit to this degradation. Accordingly in 908, with the aid of 
Cearbhal, King of Leinster, Cathal, King of Connaught, 
and the princes of Leath-cuin (the northern half of Ireland), 
he raised a formidable army, and notwithstanding the treaty 
which he had signed and the hostages which he delivered, 
Flan advanced towards the frontiers of Munster, determined 
at all hazards upon the subjugaikion and total destruction of 
the Momonians. Cormac, who was of a naturally peaceable 
disposition, on receiving intelligence of the enemy's approach 
was for sending mess^igera and having the matter oomfuro- 
mised. But such measures were fieur from being agreeable to 
the views of the unbending Flahertach. This Abbot was an 
avowed enemy to peace, and by his repeated advice Cormac 
was in a manner constrained to lead out his forces and march 
towards Leinster for the puipose of meeting the enemy and 
of giving them battle. The two armies came within view of 
each other at Beallach Mughna (Ballymoon in Idrone, 
County of Carlow). The Munster troops were reinforced by 
the Ossorians under their various chieftains and by many of 

• Four Masters, p. 9:»7. 



243 

the principal nobility. Nor was Flahertach the only eccle* 
siaatic who had accompanied Cormac in this ill-fated expedi- 
tion. Mac-Eogan^ Abbot of Cork^ Colman, Abbot of Ken-- 
nity (in the King's County), and Tiobrinde, Bishop of Emiy 
with many oth«9 were present at the engagem^t,* Cormae 
had a foreknowledge of his deaths and previously to the 
battle made his confession and likewise his will, in which he 
bequeathed various sacred ornaments besides divers utensils 
of gold axid silver to the Churches^ of CSashel, Lismore, Emly> 
Arma^y Kildare, and Glwdaloch. This eiigagement is re- 
presented as one of the . most desperate which had taken 
place in those times; in it the Bishop of Gashel was slain, 
together with the Abboits Mao-Eogan and Colman, Kelly, 
Prince of Ossory, Fogarty, Prince of Kerry, and about six 
thousand of their troops. Cormac 's body was afterwards 
conveyed to Cashel, where it was interred ; although it has 
been affirmed by some writers that he had been buried at 
Castledermot. This Prelate was the author of the celebrated 
work entitled the Psalter of Cashel, in which the ancient 
historical events of Ireland are chronologically recorded*-^ 
He has, likewise, written an Etymological dictionary, or 
Irish glossary,, called Sanasan Cormac, and a work on the 
genealogies of the Irish saints.f Cormac, after having estab- 
lished the See of Cashel, erected a small but beautiful chapel, 
on the summit of the rock in that City, the rums of which, 
from their bold and lofty position, are strongly calculated to 
fill the mind with notions of the piety and grandeur of for- 
mer days. This sacred edifice is, however, considered by 
some antiquaries as only a capella or chapel attached to the 
royal palace which had been erected on the top of the rock 
of Cashel; while they conjecture that the cathedral must 
have been situated in the city and most probably adjacent to 
the base of the rock, 

* Aimals oC Innisfal. Keating. t Hwtm' Writers^ A. A« S. S. p. 5. 



244 

It is natural to suppose, that during these domestie con* 
diets aggravated by the incursions of the Danes, the king* 
dom must have been in a state of unusual excitement; while 
discipline, morality, and the general interest of religion had 
been considerably effected. The frequent attacks which the 
Ostmen had made on the religious establishments and the 
indiscriminate slaughter in which these scenes had iuTariably 
terminated obliged the mcmks and other ecclesiastics on many 
occasions to take up arms in self-defence. That which 
had at first originated from this imperative cause, and which 
stands not only justified but even demanded by the very 
voice of nature, did in a short time, from habit and the ]Nre* 
valence of example, assume the character of a national and 
indispensable duty; and for this reason it was that, in the 
battle of Ballymoon, such a number of ecclesiastics had been 
present, contrary to the discipline and wise regulations of 
their pious ancestors. 

To the unsettled state of society in those times must be 
traced the introduction of that class of persons so generally 
known in our annals by the names of Corbes and HrenachiJ^ 

* Corba or Cnii«rian, in its etymologici} mdm, signiifli a joint-paitoer, and m 
dttrived from the Irish words, Omh (ia latin Con) %od forba, a landed estate ', in 
an ecclesiastical sense, it means the successor of a person invested with ecclesiastical 
dignity. The monastic and other Church property haying been monopoKaed by | 

the individuals under whose protection it had been plaeed, the title Comorban or I 

Corba was soon after adopted by the same usurpers^ These Corbet were gene- 
rally laymen or tonsured clerks ; yet some few among them were in holy orders* | 
and this latter description usually presided over those churches which in former I 
times had been minor bishoprics. Besides the property which belonged to the 
abbies, several of the Corbes possessed lands attached to episcopal sees, out of 
which they were bound to pay certain mensat does to the bishop. The Erenaeht 
were a somewhat similar desoription of people, but of an inierioi class. The term, 
in its original sense, signifies an Archdeacon or econome. In the middle ages the j 
office of Archdeacon fell generally info the hands of laymen, and this abuse prevailed | 
to a great extent in England, France and the sooth of Germany. In Ireland the 
system of lay archdeacons or erenachism became very general. These Erenachs 
were universally laymen, with the exception that they usually received the tonsure, 
and they were the actual possessors of episcopal lands, out of which they were 
bound to pay certain annual contributitos, llie Eienacbs as well as the Corbes 



245 

During the devastatiotis of the Danes, several of the Irish 
prelates and particularly the abbots of the large monasteries 
were accustomed to commit their lands to the protection of 
some neighbouring prince or dynast. These individuals con- 
tinued to hold, as guardians, this ecclesiastical property for 
a series of years, but at length they abused the trust which 
had with such confidence been placed in their hands ; they in 
many instances mcMiopolized the entire of these possessions 
and actually annexed them to their own estates. The abuses 
which arose from this system were lamentable and became the 
source of unprecedented scandal, but particularly in the 
-Archdiocess of Armi^h. It has been already noticed that 
ihe law of St. Patrick, or tribute intended for the mamtenance 
of the Church of Armagh, had in the preceding century been 
strictly enforced by several Primates over the Provinces of 
•Munster and Connaught. This national revenue, having been 
augmented by various other property already attached to that 
Church, rendered the See an object worthy the attention of 
certain powerful and avaricious aspirants. 

On the death of the Primate St. Maelbrigid in 926, an 
occurrence took place in this metropolitan See, which must 
have been as disedifying to the faithful as it was disgraceful 
io those who had taken a shure in it. 

In that year the See of Armagh with its temporalities was 
usurped by certain dynasts of that territory, and who in all 
probability had, under the system of Erenachism, been con- 
stituted its guardians. With the specific grounds upon which 



were, m ftict, the usurpers of Church property ; and when one of them happened 
to die, the sept immediately aasembled and elected another. The only difference 
therefore, between the Corbes and Erenachs consisted in this, that the Corbes poe- 
aessed a greater extent of property and held lands which belonged to the abbies, 
without being in any manner dependant on the bishop : while the Erenachs held 
their lands under the bishop and were the perpetual tenants of the Incumbent. — 
Some of the lands possessed by these Corbes and Erenachs were called Termoti'landi, 
as being exempted from all state taxes, but were charged with ceHain pensions to 
be paid yearly to the bishop of the diocese. 



246 

the usurpers ailempted to justify their proceedings we have 
not been made acquainted, but it is gtterally supposed that 
these dynasts had been the descendants of Diuie, from whom 
St Patrick <d»tained a grant of the site on which the Cathe- 
dral of Armi^h had been elected. This powerful family held 
possession of the See for about two hundred years; and to 
such an excess had this usurpation been carried that no per* 
son, excqpt a member of that family, was allowed to fiU the 
metropolitan chair. For several years an eoclesiastic appeared 
belonging to the sept and he was accordingly consecrated; but 
at length, in the eleventh century, mairied laymen were intru-* 
ded, took possession of the temporalities and in all their pub* 
lic acts signed themselves Archbishops of Armagh and Pii* 
mates of Ireland. While these lay-usurpers contented them* 
selves with the temporalities of the Church, they at the same 
time had taken care to provide the See with regolarly conse- 
crated bishops, who acted as suffragans under them, adrni^ 
nistered the sacraments and performed the necessary daties of 
the ministry throughout the diocess. The friends of morality 
were grieved at these unprecedented abuses; but remonstrance 
was ineffectual, for in those awful times all the l^aws both of 
religion and of society appeared to have been under thel Qom* 
plete control of mere physical f<»rce and at the capricious' dis* 
posal of every domineering dynast. 

It has been generally renmrked as a singular featune in the 
character of this century> that the cuUivation of letters, which 
in other countries had been neglected, was still ardently cher- 
ished in many of the ancient schools of Ireland. From these 
establishments numbers of learned men came forth, many of 
whom retired to other countries and contributed to the gene- 
ral diffusion of knowledge and morality. 

The important benefits which the English nation had at 
this very time derived from Irishmen has been attested by 
many of their own writers. Learning had, it appears, 
lamentably declined in England after the death of Alfred. 



247 

That great Monarch undertook the task of restoring the 
monastic institutions which had fitUen into decay, and had he 
continued to govern that nation for a longer period, he 
would, no doubt, hare succeeded in his design. Unfortu- 
nately, howerer, for the interest of science, the reign of 
Alfred was but of short continuance. His successors neglected 
ix> patronize these religious establishments. There were no 
public schools throughout the kingdom; education was an 
objtet which the nation in general disregarded, and hence to 
such an eactent had ignorance preyailed that, it is said, an 
ecclesiastic could scarcely be found capable of either writing 
or translating a latin letter.* It hi^pened, however, that 
about the year 940 a number of Irishmen, distinguished for 
talents and deeply versed in every department of literature, 
isq[>aired to 01astonbury,t where they undertook to give lee* 
tnres and to employ every means in their power for the re- 
establishment of knowledge. The labours of these men were 
soon i^preciated; their instructions were attended by numbers 
of every rank and among their pupils is noticed the learned 
and celebrated St. Dunstan. Irishmen had distinguished 
themselves here long before this period; it is however an un- 
doubted fact, that the Irish teachers who repaired to Glaston- 
bury in the tenth century were the principal revivers of liter- 
ature in that populous and extensive portion of the Anglo- 
Saxon territories. 

Nor was it in England alone that the Irish ecclesiastics of 
this age became valuable. Numbers of th^n repaired to the 

* MabiUon, Aantl. Bened. at A. 940. 

t Osbern, in his life of St. ]>«iittan, baa the folliyimigr paasage : '< QaorQm (Hi- 
bernonxBi) multi atque illustres Viri, divinis ac secularibus Uteris nobiliter eruditi, 
dum relicta Hibernia, in terra Anglorum peregiinaturi venissent, locum habitationis 
8ii» OUtUmUm de1egerttnt,....8iucfphiDt filios nobiliun liberalibus studns im- 
bvendoa -, ut quod mintu ad usnm loci ubertas eshibevet, eorum quoe docebant liber- 
alitate redundaret. Adest ergo nobilissinuu in Christo puer Dunstanns, inter alios 
unus, imo pre aliis solus, ubi paalo diligentius quam imbecilla etas ferre posset li- 
terarum studio intentus, &c/' 



248 

Continent and were the founders and abbots of historically 
celebrated religious establishments. Among these eminent 
men it may be proper to notice the holy and. penit^iitial 
Maccallin, first Abbot of the Monastery of WalciodoniSi 
now Vassor near the Meuse* Maccallin and eleven other 
Irishmen accompanied St. Cadroe to France, where they in- 
tended to devote the remainder of their days to the practice 
of the most rigid austerities. St. Cadroe had been a British 
Scoty and received his education in Armagh. Being gifted 
with very superior talents, and having made himself master 
of the classics, history, philosophy and other branches of 
literature, he returned to Scotland and formed places q£ edu- 
cation, which had at the tnne been deplorably wanted in that 
country.* Cadroe, however, was determined on leading an 
eremetic life and accordingly repaired to the Continent, on 
which occasion Maccallin and eleven others associated them- 
selves with him. After a perilous voyage they arrived at 
Boulogne and from thence proceeded to St. Fnrsey's Monas- 
tery in Peronne. By the kindness of Hersendis, a pious and 
wealthy matron residing in that neighbourhood, a convenient 
site was obtained in a part of the forest called TheorascenHs, 
near the river Oise and adjoining a church which had been 
dedicated to St. Michael, while their community being now 
•formed, Maccallin was, although against his wish, appointed 
their superior.f Having spent some time in this retreat 
Maccallin and Cadroe embraced the Benedictine institute, the 
former at Gorzia, a monastery in the diocess of Metz, and 
the latter at the celebrated Monastery of Fleury-sur-Loire. 
Eilbert, the husband of Hersendis, had by this time com- 
pleted the great Abbey of Walciodorus; Maccallin was ac- 
cordingly directed to undertake the government of it, and 
thus did he become its first Abbot, still retaining the manage- 
ment of the Monastery of St. Michael. The history of this 

♦ Mabillon, Anna!.— Vit. Cadroe. t BoUandus, at 2I«l. J6u. 



249 

ancient and celebrated Abbey presents an interesting and 
lengthened detail of the labours of St Maccallin. That ter- 
ritory was not yet recovered from the wars and revolutions by 
which it had for centuries been agitated. Ignorance and de^ 
geaeracy of morals had to a frightful extent pervaded all 
ranks^ while the clergy themselves harrassed by a severe mis* 
sion stood in need of some experienced men to assist them in 
the discharge of their numerous duties* On every occasion^ 
Maccallin was a never-feiling auxiliary, and in consequence 
of his extraordinary exertions, his name has been mentioned 
with great praise by the writers of those times and in various 
tnartyrologies. About the year 960> St. Cadroe> at the 
urgent request of Otho King of Germany, undertook the 
government of Walciodorus, and was afterwards Abbot of 
the Monastery of St. Felix at Metz where he died in 075. 
St. Maccallin returned to the Monastery in the forest, in 
which retreat he continued until his death which occurred on 
the 21st of January, A. D. 978. 

STk FiNOBN, a native of Ireland and an eminent master of 
a spiritual life, became the immediate successor of St. Cadroe 
in the Monastery of Metz.* About the close of this century, 
the ancient Abbey of St Symphorian, which had almost be* 
come a ruin, was rebuilt by Adalbero II, Bishop of Metz, 
and this Prelate having a great esteem for the learning and 
sanctity of Fingen caused that Abbey to be forthwith placed 
under his direction. Adalbero was a great encourager of 
Irish missioners: he obtained from Otho III a confirmation of 
the rights and possessions of this establishment, on condition 
that none but Irish monks should be allowed into its commu«> 
nity ; if however such postulants did not apply, the Abbot 
was then at liberty to admit persons of any other nation* 
This deed was signed by the Emperor at Frankfort on the 
25th of January, A. D. 992. Nor were the labours of 

* MabilloD, Annal. Beoed. 

2i 



250 

Fii^en confined to Metz; he founded or at least re-estaln 
Iished several monasteries in these districts, to which both 
Germany and the north of France had been greatly indebted. 
Among these, the Monastery of St. Peter and St. Vitonus, 
now St. Vannes at Verdun is particularly mentioned. In this 
establishment he placed a community of Irish monks and 
took them under his own direction. Soon after its foundation, 
Richard, Dean of the diocess of Rheims, and Frederic, Count 
of Verdun applied to him for permission to become members 
of this house. Fingen had been for some time unwilling to 
receive them, conceiving that men of their rank would not so 
easily submit to the poverty and rigorous discipline of the' 
Monastery. In this, however, he was mistaken, and under 
his instruction they became two of the most eminent men of 
these times. St. Fingen died in the year 1004 and was suc- 
ceeded in the government of the Monastery by Richard, his 
zealous and beloved disciple.* 

The reputation of Irish ecclesiastics, as teachers of science 
and of morality, had in this age become so celebrated 
that many of them were invited to retire to the Continent and 
were particularly patronized. About the year 974, Warinus, 
Archbishop of Colc^e, erected an extensive monastery for 
the Irish in an island of the Rhincf Another distinguished^ 
literary establishment had at this time been conducted by 
Irishmen in the diocess of Toul; while Duncan, an Irish 
Bishop, taught at the same period, in the Monastery of 
Remigius at Rheims.j: This learned Prelate has written, for 
the use of his scholars, explanatory observations on the first 
book of Pomponius Mela, regarding the situation of the 
earth; also, a Commentary on the nine books of Martianus 
Capella on the Liberal Arts. Duncan having been thus em- 
ployed for many years died at Rheims about the close of the 
tenth century. 

"• Mabillon, at A. 1004. t Id. at A. 974. i Hist. Littertire. 



CHAPTER n. 

Succe$$ar$ •f Su Pairich — Episcopal iS^-riZeZt^ocM 
Foundations 0/ the Tenth Century. 

• The incttmbency of Maelbrigid in the Metropolitan See con* 
tinued until 926. His successor was Joseph^ styled in the 
Ulster Annals ''Prince of Armagh, a Bishop, a Wise-man, 
and an Anchoret."* On the death of Maelbrigid, the sept 
of Daire^ as has been aheady noticed, seized upon the tem- 
poralities of ^the See of Annagh.t Joseph was the first of 
that family who had been advanced to the primatial chair ; he 
18 allowed to have received consecration and is represented 
as a man of extensive learning. It does not appear that his 
electbn had obtained the concurrence of the clergy, nor were 
they, it is probable, even consulted, particularly as these 
powerful dynasts availing themselves of the national confu- 
sion, were determined to make a monopoly of the See in 
&vour of their own family. However, on Joseph's accession, 
the clergy became reconciled, and he is represented as ''a 
good and a wise Bishop.'^ Joseph held the See for nine years 
and upon his demise in 936, Moelp^tkick was appointed 
his successor. Moelpatrick, although a member of the family 
of Daire, is allowed by all our annalists to have been a regu- 
larly consecrated Bishop. j: He is likewise styled '^ Prince of 
Armagh/' and died after an incumbency of only five months* 
Catasagh IL was consecrated soon after the death of Pat- 
rick and placed by the same family in the archiepiscopal chair. 
This Prelate is styled in the Ulster Annals, son of Dulgan, 
and Ciomorban'of St. Patrick. Catasach, having governed 

* Ware at Aa&agh. t See chap. I. % Tr. Th, p. 296. 



252 

the See twenty years died in 957, and upon his demise Mure- 
dach^ son of Fei^s, was appointed in the same manner as 
his predecessor had been and was soon after consecrated. — 
Muredach having held the See for nine years, was, according 
to the Psalter of Cashel, deposed in 966. OTlaherty, on the 
authority of a manuscript catalogue, states, that he resigned 
the See after having governed it for seven years and that he 
died in the ninth year of his consecration. The Cashel cata- 
logue, however, appears to have been preferably adopted, ac- 
cording to which his incumbency has been brought down to 
966. DuBDALBTHE II. succeedcd Muredach and was conse- 
crated Archbishop of Armagh in 966. In consequence of 
his great wisdom, this Prelate had jn 989 been elected by the 
Columbians both of Ireland and of North' Britaii^ chief supe* 
rior of all their monasteries;* although according to their 
primitive institute no person could be superior of that body 
unless a simple priest. The incumbency of Dubdalethe con- 
tinned thirty*two years, he died in 998 and was succeeded by 
MuR£CHAN« This Pi'date, having governed the See for three 
years, resigned it in lOOl.f He has been considered by Col- 
gan as one of the lay usuipers of the primatial chain This 
opinion, however, is not confirmed by the authority of any 
sufficient record; the reasons, moreover, by which that writer 
endeavours to support it, appear altogether unsatisfactory. It 
16 impossible to identify all these eight laymen who styled 
themselves Archbishops of this See,j: and it is believed that 
their names have been omitted in the Cashel catalogue. The 
consecration of Murechan has been generally admitted : he 
was succeeded in 1001 by Malmury, the son of Eochad. 

The See of Cashel derives its foundation from the tenth 
century and had for its first Bishop Cormac Mac-Culinan, in 
whom, as has been already observed, the mitre and the seep* 
tre were both united .§ Before the time of Cormac, Cashel 

* Ti . Th. p. 503. t Psalter of C«hcL t See Cent. XI. j See chap. I. 



253 

although the residence of the kings of Munstefy liad been 
subject to the jurisdiction of the Bishops of Emly; but it 
was raised to the'rank of an archiepiscopal see in the Council 
of Kellsy A.D. 1162, Cormac erected a cathedral in Cashel, 
which, according to the annals of the Priory of the Island of 
all Saints, was afterwards rebuilt and consecrated with great 
solemnity. The records of this See are veiy imperfect for a 
long time after the death of Cormac. Between that Prelate 
and the Council of Kells, comprehending a period of 244 
years, the names of only four of its Bishops are mentioned, 
while their acts as well as those of other eminent ecclesiastics 
have been completely destroyed. 

The foundation of Thb See of Rapaoe must in all proba* 
bility be dated from the tenth century; yet its origin remains 
involved in considerable obscurity. An extensive Monastery 
had been founded in Raphoe by St Columbkill, and accord* 
ing to some authorities the Church of this establishment was 
in aftertunes converted into a cathedral by St. Eunan, who is 
considered to have been its first Bishop. The time, however, 
in which St. Eunan flourished cannot be ascertained.* It is 
certain that there had been bishops in Raphoe during the tenth 
century. Malduin Mac-Kinnfalaid was Bishop of that dio- 
cess in 930,t and after him occurs the name of his successor 

* Doctor Lanigan treating of Adamnan as Abbot of Raphoe in the seventh ceD« 
tury» seems to think that this distinguished Father of the Irish Church had been the 
same person as the St. £unan mentioned by other writers. His words are: "I 
strongly suspect that St. Eunan, who is usually called the first Bishop of Raphoe, 
was no other than Adamnan ; not that Adamnan was ever a Bishop, for were he so, 
he could not have become Abbot of Hy ; but that he was the ancient patron Saint 
of that place before it became an episcopal See. Colgan never mentions this St. 
Eunan, nor could Ware discover any accout of him. The first Bishop of Raphoe 
tbat we meet with was Malduin Mac-Kinnfaiaid who died about 930. These ob- 
servations are not indeed su£^ent to shew, that Adamnan has been changed into St* 
Eunan ; but it is a very remarkable circumsUnce that the festival of the Saint called 
Eunan, is kept on the 23rd of September. Now this was the day on which Adam- 
nan died, and on which his memory was revered not only at Raphoe, but in many 
other churches."— Vol. III. p. 99. Takhig all these circumstances into account 
the conjecture, it must be admitted, is both ingenious and plausible. 

t Tr, ITi. p. 509— Ware Bishops. 



254 

Aengus Uua Lapain, whose death is assigned to 057. From 
that period until the incumbency of Gilbert O'Caran in 1172, 
even the names of the prelates in this See have not been re-* 
corded, owing very probably to the dcTastations committed 
by the Danish leader Aulifie, particularly in this warlike dis-> 
trict of Ulster. 

Of all the sees in Ireland, that of Ferns suffered most from 
the Danish invasion, during which both churches and libra* 
ries had been indiscriminately committed to the flames. This 
may account for the silence observed by all our annalists re- 
lative to the ancient succession in this diocess. It is a sin« 
gular fact, that during the lapse of three hundred and thirty- 
four years, that is, between Killen, who was Bishop of Ferns 
in 714, and Dermit Hua-Rodachan, who was the incumbent 
in 1048, there is mention made of only one prelate in this 
See, which had for so many years maintained an honorary 
precedence among the bishoprics of Lemster. In Colgan'a 
list from the Four Masters, Laidgnen is marked as Comorban 
or Bishop of this See and his death is assigned to 938.*-— 
Ferns did not at this time possess the archiepiscopal dignity 
or rather precedency, which had been conferred on it in the 
days of St. Aidan. This ecclesiastical distinction was trans- 
ferrred from Ferns to Kildare in the beginning of the ninth 
century, after it had been enjoyed by the former for more 
than two hundred years. 

The history of the monastic foundations presents almost a 
continued series of sacril^e and destruction. During the 
course of this century, the ancient Abbey of Clonmacnds was 
eleven times pillaged by the Danes, in which profanation 
some of the Momonians had, on two occasions, assisted.f — 
The work of ruin carried on in the foregoing age did not, 
however, discourage some religious benefactors from evincing 
their respect towards this venerable establishment. In the 

* A. A. S. S. p. 223. t Annals of Munster. 



255 

year 901, Flan, King of Meath, and the Abbot Golman en- 
larged the church by the addition of a splendid capella, de- 
signated the temple of the kings, and soon after Colman 
erected the great church, in which the patron Saint lies in- 
terred.* To this century is assigned the foundation of the 
Abbey of St. Mary in Dublin.f 

When the Danes of Leinster had been satiated with the 
plunder of Clonmacnois, they usually passed through Kildare, 
and on all these occasions the ancient monastery of that town 
appears to have been marked out as the object of their fury. 
Kildare, during the tenth century, had been eleven times 
stormed by the Danes, and these invaders, after having de- 
stroyed the town and the churches, carried away many of the 
inhabitants as captives, together with the whole of their most 
valuable effects. The depradations committed in 962 even 
surpassed any of those which this ancient place had as yet 
witnessed: the town was consumed, the inhabitants were put 
to the sword, and a great number of ecclesiastics were either 
put to death or made captives.^: 

While these scenes of terror had been repeated in the Pro- 
vince of Leinster, the religious foundations of the south were 
not exempt from their share of the national calamity* The 
Abbey of Cork had been plundered and consumed three 
times in one year; while the monastery and schools of Lis- 
more presented the appearance of a place abandoned by man 
and given up to desolation.^ 

The ninth and tenth centuries form one dismal night of 
persecution, in which the monastic foundations principally 
suffered. The eleventh century, however, presents a brighter 
prospect; while in subsequent times, new orders were estab- 
lished, and religious retreats were seen rising up and flourish- 
ing in every district throughout the country. 

* A. A. S. S. p. 407. t See Cent. XII. c. II. t Tr. Th. p. 629. $ Four Masten. 



CHAPTER III. 

Reliffiaus and Literary Characters of the Tenth Centurjf"^ 
General Observations. 

The Church of Ireland, even amidst the terrors of these 
times, had by no means been deficient in learned and saintly 
men. Among these may be noticed: 

* St. Anatoliits, the patron Saint of the chief collegiate 
church of Salins in the diocess of Besancon. This apostolic 
man was a native of Ireland, and in the commencement of 
this century emigrated to the Continent.* Anatolius had been 
a bishop before he departed from his own country, but it does 
not appear that he was attached to any see. Having travel- 
led to Rome, he continued for some years in that city, where 
his extensive acquaintance with the Scriptures and the Fathers 
soon brought him into notice, and he was appointed to de- 
liver lectures in some of the principal schools. Being, how- 
ever, desiroud of leading a retired life, Anatolius left that 
city and travelled into France. During his stay in Burgundy, 
his labours in preaching the Gospel were incessant; and after 
having traversed the greater part of these extensive districts 
he at length arrived at the city of Salins, in the diocess of 
Besancon.f At a small distance from the city, and at the 
toot of a dreary mountain stood an oratory dedicated to St. 
Symphorian, Martyr of Autum. Thither Anatolius repaired 
and knowing it to be the place which Providence had marked 
out for his retreat, he prayed for a time in the oratory and 
determined on fixing his abode in this sequestered hermitage. 
Here this penitential anchoret soon after closed his mortal 

• Bollandus, Yit. f Colgun at 3rd Feb, 



I 



257 

career^ but not until iiis sanctity had been recognized by the 
faithful in Salins and the surrounding country. Several 
churches in that diocess have been dedicated to his name, and 
particularly one of the four parish churches of the city of 
Salins, situated on the mountain, at the south side of which 
is the hermitage of St. Anatolius. The body of the Saint 
was, in the eleventh century, removed to the principal church 
of Salins, while in 1229 Nicholas, Bishop of Besancon, had 
it placed in a silver shrine and deposited in the same church. 

St. Maimbodus, another Irish ecclesiastic, retired from 
his native country early in the tenth century and travelled 
through many parts of the Continent, for the purpose of 
preaching the Gospel.* His labours had been particularly 
directed to the northern districts of Italy and Gaul, and hav* 
ing at length arrived in Burgundy he was hospitably enter- 
tained by a pious nobleman, who pressed him earnestly to 
take up his abode in that territory. Maimbodus, however, 
conceiving that his services might be more necessary in other 
places, proceeded on his journey and stopped at the small 
village of Domnipetra, eight miles from Besancon. On his 
departure from this place, and at a small distance from the 
village, he was met by robbers, who being disappointed in 
their expectation of getting money wounded him in such a 
manner that he died on the spot. The body of the Saint was 
buried by the faithful in the church of St. Peter in that village, 
but was afterwards translated with great solemnity to Mon-* 
belliard, by order of Berengarius, Bishop of Besancon. — 
The same Prelate decreed that the memory of St. Maimbo- 
dus should be celebrated in the diocess of Besancon on the 
23rd of January, the anniversary of his death. 

The learned and saintly Dunchad O'Braoin flourished 
about the middle of the tenth century .f This Saint was of 
the illustrious family of the Nialls, and was born in a district 

* Colgan at 23rd Jan. t Id* at 16th Jan. 



258 

of the CouDty of Westmeath, now called the Barony of 
Brawny. At an early age he repaired to the Monastery of 
Clonmacnoisy where he embraced the monastic state and 
made great progress in leaniing and piety. Donchad gave 
lectures on the sacred Scriptures in the schools of that estab* 
lifihment and was considered the most eminent among the 
divines of the Irish Ohurch in this century. The applause 
which his learning had now elicited became so great, that 
Dunchad formed the determination of retiring for ever from 
public life. For this purpose he withdrew to a desert place in 
the mountains of Ely O'Carol, where he shut himself up and 
lived as an anchonst for many years. On the death, how- 
ever, of Tuathal, who had been both Abbot and Bishop of 
Glonmacn<H8 in 969, Dunchad was unanimously elected to 
succeed him in the abbacy, and having been brought from 
his retreat, was reluctantly compelled to undertake the 
government of it His love for retirement would not allow 
faim to remain long in this exalted situation. He accordingly 
resolved to withdraw to some distant part of Ireland, where 
he should be altogether secluded from the intercourse of man. 
In the year 974 Dunchad removed to Armagh, in which 
place he expected to live retired: in this, however, he was 
disappointed; his reputation tot learning and holiness was 
soon spread throughout that neighbourhood, and so great 
was the respect which was paid to him that he at lei^h re- 
solved on leaving it. As soon as his determination had been 
made known to the inhabitants, a deputation, consisting of 
some of the principal persons of that country, waited on the 
Saint and' requested that he would stay with them for one 
year longer; to which Dunchad with retuctance complied. — 
He is said to have wrought many miracles, and among others, 
to have restored to life the infant child of a widow. Tiger- 
nach, author of the Annals of Clonmacnois, says that Dun- 
chad was the last of the Irish saints up to his time through 
whose intercession God restored a dead person to life. A 



259 

year having elapsed^ the Saint waa preparing to depart, when 
a similar request was made by the people of Armagh; and it 
was r^Matecl year after year, until at length be died in bis 
hermitage on the 16th of January, A.D. QS?.** 

PnoBus or Cobnachaib, author of the life of St. Patrick^ 
flourished in the tenth century. This eminent man had been 
chief lecturer in the schools of Slane at the time of the great 
conflagration in 949. In that year the town of Slane had 
been stormed by the Danes; while Probus with many others 
fled for shelter into the belfry of the church when they were 
consigned to the flamestf The life of St Patrick written by 
Probus consists of two books, and is admired as one of the 
most circumstantial and correct records which the piety of 
ancient times has handed down to us on that interesting sub- 
ject 

The tenth century produced likewise a great number of 
scribes and chronographers who taught in the different 
schools of the prorinces, but of whose acts no satisfactory 
narrative appears to have been transmitted. In this cata^- 
logue, the name of Kineth, Scribe and Professor of Deny, 
is honourably recorded ; and of Paulinus, .chief Scribe of 
Leth-cuin, to whom Probus addressed his life of St Patrick. 
Among other eminent men noticed in this catalogue we find 
Colman, lecturer in the schools of Kildare; Flan, professor 
in Drumdiffe and a celebrated Irish chronographer; Cron- 
mail, lecturer in Tallaght; Mac-Siedul, lecturer in Bangor; 
Mac-Feredach, lecturer in Castledermot; O'Flanagan, scribe 
of Armagh; O'Huactain of Kelts; Odran of Cionmacnois 
and a host of others ; whose solitary names have been re- 
corded in our annals, and are occasionally accompanied by 
some distinctive term serving to indicate the ecclesiastical 
dignity which the individual enjoyed, or the department of 
literature in which he excelled. 

• AcU. Punch. . t Tr. Tb. p. 219. 



260 

The eccleMiastical as well as the political history of Ireland 
during the tenth century appears to form one uninterrupted 
series of both private and national calamities. The invasions 
of the Danes and the unprecedented scenes by which they 
bad been accompanied might, no doubt, be accounted as so 
many temporal visitations. The ways of heaven are, however, 
mysterious: Providence has its own grand object in view, 
and that object it will attain by instruments simple and ordi- 
nary, and even without man being conscious of the work, 
which by the dispensations of heaven he is destined to ac- 
complish. When the Goths and Vandals in the fifth cen- 
tury came down from their forests and broke through the 
barriers of the Roman empire and at length became masters 
of the capitol, the result was, that although much public 
and private calamity had been occasioned, yet all terminated 
in one splendid event — in the conversion of a people, who 
from their localities, habits, and other circumstances, could 
not be ' easily approached by missionaries and most likely 
would not in any other way have been visited by the light of 
the Gospel. With respect to the Danes in the tenth century, 
the case seems to be of a parallel description. We have at 
this period the Scandinavians dispersed over a frozen and an 
almost impenetrable region — men unacquainted with civilized 
life, locked out, as it were, from the rest of their fellow-crea- 
tures and given up to the mere impulse of destitute fallen 
nature. Conversion with respect to such a people almost sets 
, what may be called ordmary power at defiance. It were, in- 
deed, less difficult for the Christians of earlier times to con- 
vert the Goth and the Vandal ; and whatever might have 
been the occasional intercourse between the rude inhabitants 
of the German forests and their really civilized and polished 
neighbours in the south, no such argument holds good for 
the poor Norwegian of the tenth century, seeking for a sub- 
sistence on an almost frozen ocean, or the Scandinavian whom 
necessity compelled to abandon his trackless forest and join 



261 

his Norwegian associate in the work of enterprize. Their 
object had been, no doubt, a worldly one; but they were 
brought from their deserts by the unsearchable ways of Pro- 
vidence and for the purpose of having the important truths of 
revelation conveyed to their minds. The instruments by 
which the Gospel was established have been various and 
wonderful; and the light of Christianity has been diffused 
not only by missioners visiting the land of the infidel but by 
Providence itself leading the very infidel into the country and 
into the sanctuary, where his conversion will be inevitably 
effected. Now this appears to have been the very case with 
the Danes. This unsettled and piratical people, although 
frequently repulsed, had at length gained a footing in Ire- 
land; they built towns and cities, formed habits of intimacy 
with the natives and in process of time became masters of 
many of the principal maritime districts of the country. In 
the mean time the Christian Gospel, which sometimes makes 
its way imperceptably, but at length brilliantly, soon 
beamed on these benighted people; the Danes were con* 
verted and became the founders of some of the most excel- 
lent and magnificent institutions in the country. 

The state of literature in the tenth century is another sub* 
ject, which might well challenge our consideration; and in 
this respect Ireland forms a singularly remarkable contrast 
with many of the other nations of Europe. From the man- 
ner in which the kingdoms of the Continent had been so long 
convulsed, we may be allowed to suppose that literary pur- 
suits had been almost abandoned. In this age, however, 
many successful efforts had been made by statesmen and 
princes, and especially by the Emperor Otho, to repair the 
moral ruin which the events of bye-gone days had occasioned* 
For this reason it was that Fingen, Duncan and other Irish- 
n)ien had been so peculiarly patronized at Rheims, Metz, 
Verdun and along the territories of France and Germany. — 
Learning had been revived by Irishmen in the imperial city 



262 

of Ciologne, they taught the claasica and the icJeDcea in the 
exten8i¥ediooe8sof Tool; they established schools along the 
Rhine; in the Netherlands, Switzerland and the northern 
distriots of Italy; in short, the Irish ecclesiastics of the tenth 
and preceding centuries were the persons by whose means 
the reign of literature had been established in many of the 
most distinguished cities and provinces of Europe. If to 
these &cts may be added the schoola which had been formed 
by Irishmen in Glastonbury and other places, we must be 
fiurly allowed to infer that, even in the midst of the Danish 
wars, the cultivation of letters had been encouraged and ad- 
mirably upheld in this country. 



ELEVENTH CENTURY. 

CHAPTER L 

CSMstianiiy embraced by the Danes tkronghout Ireland-^ 
The Danes of Dublin governed by a Bishop — Origin and 
antiquity of the See of Dublin investigated— The Arch- 
Hsk^ of Canterbury ne^er enjoyed jurisdiction over the 
Irish Church^Zetters of Lanfranc— Letter of Pope 
Gregory Vll^Irish establishments at RaHtinm^State of 
Irish literature in th^ eleventh century* 

The very caases which urged the Danes to abaDdon the 
re^ons of the north and set out in quest of new and more 
adrantageous aettlenuents, may, with probability^ be num- 
bered among those ordinary means employed by Providence 
in efiecting the total oonveision of that people. It has been 
already noticed that the Danes of Dublin had^ in the tenth 
century, embraced the ikith;' their countrymen^ however, 
who had settled in Waterford, Cork, Lhneiick and other 
]^acesy were still obstinate pagans; nor does it appear that 
they had genenilly embraced the Gospel, until by being 
humbled the season for cool reflection ar^ved and the ferocity 
of the warrior thus gave way to the meekness and more 
kindly feelingB of the Quistian convert From the year 976, 
when Brian Boroimhe succeeded his brother Mahon on the 
throne <rf Mnnster, the Danish power had been generally 
unsuccessful in the field; one defeat was followed by another 
still more disastrous, until at length the fatal blow was struck 
and their overthrow accomplished by the same renowned 
warrior, in the memorable battle of Clontarf, A. D. 1014. — 

From this period the Danes ceased to be formidable and 



2G4 

appear to have been exclusively limited to the few maritime 
towns of which they happened at the time to have possession. 
It is at such a season and under such circumstances, that 
men generally feel inclined to turn their thoughts to the more 
serious truths of religion. For this reason we find that these 
Northmen, in Limerick, Waterford and other towns, began 
rapidly to abandon paganism, so that before the middle of 
this century the Danish people throughout Ireland had em- 
braced Christianity. 

The Danes of Dublin, although converted to the Christian 
faith in the tenth century, were nevertheless without a bishop; 
when, however, Sitric their King had returned from a pilgrbi- 
age which he had undertaken, he used all his influence to 
have the Danish town of Dublin erected into a See. Accord- ' 
ingly Donatus or more properly Dunan was, in 1040, conse- 
crated its first Bishop,* 

* This statement, although a very general one and resting on 
the best authority, has nevertheless been questioned. For the 
purpose of giving the See of Dublin a claim to higher anti- 
quity, some writers have had recourse to the period in which 
St. Rumold flourished; maintaining at the same time that 
this Prelate had been the regularly constituted Ordinary of 
that See and as such had attended to its administration for 
some years antecedent to his missionary labours on the Con- 
tinent. Should this doctrine be satisfactorily established, it 
vrill follow that DubHn had been an episcopal see in the year 
760, and that consequently, as far as antiquity may be in 
question, it has gained an accession of nearly three hundred 
years. Hence arises the necessity of examining the authori- 
ties on which this opinion is made to rest, and of contrasting 
them with the documents produced by those who insist, that 
the See of Dublin dates its origin, from the year 1040. Those 
writers who maintain that St. Rumold had been Bishop of 

• Usher, Not. ad Kp. 25. Syl. 



265 

Dublin as an episcopal See, ground their doctrine principally 
on the following authoritiei^: firsts on the Belgian Martyr- 
ology; secondly, on the Carthusian Martyrology, edited at 
Cologne; thirdly, on the testimony of the Synod of Mech- 
lin, held in 1570; fourthly, on the Chronicle of the Bene- 
dictine Order; and fifthly, on the Acts of St Rumold, trans- 
lated from the Belgian by Joannes Domynsius, in the eleventh 
century. The Belgian Martyrology, treating of St. Rumold, 
has these words:* ^'St Rumold, Archbishop and Martyr, hav- 
ing relinquished his country, his parents, his nobility and his 
Archbishopric of DubHn, came to Rome, from that part of 
Scotia which is called Ireland (Hibemia), and after having 
received the benediction of the Pontiff, he, according to the 
apparition of an angel, came to that place where the rivet 
Soald disembogues itself into the sea; that is, he came to 
Mechlin, where he planted the rudiments of the faith in such 
a manner that he is deservedly accounted the apostle of the 
Mechlinians/' The words of the Carthusian Martyrology 
arerf **The festival of St. Rumold, Bishop and Martyr, son 
of the King of Ireland and Archbishop of Dublin." To 
these authofities is added the following Ordinance of the 
Synod of Mechlin: J ** Whereas, St. Rumold, Archbishop^ 

* " Sanctua Romoldus Arcbiepiscopuset Martyr, ez ea parte Scotie qa»*Hibenua 
dicitur, disertis patria, parentibuB, nobilitate et Archiepiacopatu Dublinieoai, 
Romam ivit, et inde habita Pontificis benedictione, juxta Angeli apparitionem eu 
pervenit, nbi Scaldis tfuTras in mare se exooerat. . . .hoc est, ad Mechliniam, ub^ 
sic fidei rudimenta plantavit, ut merito MechliDtensium Apostolus habeatur." 

t " Festum Sancti Rumoldi Episcopi et Martyris, filii regis Hiberniae et Arch* 
iepiscopi Dubliniensis." 

t ** Quoniam Sanctus Rumoldus Archiepiscopus et Martyr, Patronus est Ecclo" 
sis Metropolitans Mechliniensis, ideoque per totam prov^iQciain Mechliniensem 
merito veDeratus, Ordinat Synodus, ut primo Julii, quo martyrium subiit, per 
dvitatem et totam diosccsem tamquam duplex ad iosur festi novem lectionum cele* 
brelur." 

§ The term. Archbishop, as found in this passage, sigoifiea that St. Rumold was 
ia the miads of the Fathers of the Synod. Archbishop of Dublin. It could not 

3 I. 



266 

and Martyr, is the Patron of the Metropolitan Church oC 
Mechlin and is, therefore, deservedly to be venerated through- 
out the whole province, the Synod ordains, that on the first 
of July, the day on which he suffered martyrdom, his festi- 
val be celebrated in the city and throughout the entire diocess 
as a double, in the same manner as a feast of nine lessons/' 
The Benedictine Chronicle, in recording the events of the 
year 776, supplies an evidence of a similar description:'* ''This 
year the most holy Rumold has consecrated by his martyr- 
dom, who, descended of a noble family in Ireland, after hav- 
ing resigned the Archiepiscopal See of Dublin, repaired first 
to Great Britain and Belgium and from thence to Rome, the 
citadel of religion." In short, the Acts of St. Rumold, as 
delivered by Domynsius, afford the same testimony; re- 
presenting the Martyr, not only as a Bishop, but moreover 
as Archbishop of the diocess of Dublin.f 

Having thus presented a fair statement of the grounds on 
which the advocates for the antiquity of the See of Dublin 
undertake to establish their opinion, it now becomes necessary 
to place before the reader the aiguments of those who insist 
that the See of Dublm had been founded under Sitric in the 
year 1040. In confirmation of this fact, these writers refer 
to the best of all possible authorities, namely, to the ancient 
records of the See itself. In the Black Book (Liber Niger) 
of Christ Church in Dublin, is to be seen a recorded docu- 
ment in these words: ''Sitricus, King of Dublin, son of 
Ableb (Anlaf) Earl of Dublin, gave to the Holy Trinity, and 

refer to the Archiepiscopal See of Mechlin, which had not been raised to a metro- 
politaa rank until the year 1559, or nearly eight centuries after the death of the 
Saint. 

* *' Annum hnnc Martyrio suo Sanctissimus Rumoldus consecravit. Qui ia 
Hibemia nobili stemmate natos, abdicato Archiepiscopatu Bubliniensi, Britan* 
niam magnam primum Belgiumque petivit et inde religionis arcem, Romam."— 
Chron. Bened.ap. Ath. Yepres. Tom. III. 

t Vide Acta Rumoldi, ap. H. Vardoeum. 



267 

to Donatus, first Bishop of Dublin^ a place where the arches 
or vaults were founded, to build thereon the Church of the 
Holy Trinity (now Christ Church), together with the follow- 
ing lands: viz., Bealdulek, Rechen, Partrahem, with their 
villaioa, cattle and com. He also contributed gold and sil- 
ver enough, wherewith to build the church and the whole 
court thereof." This docum^nt^ ancient and consistent as it 
is, supplies us with an authority which cannot be questioned; 
hence it has been followed by Ware, Usher and in fact by all 
our most approved antiquarians. With respect to the Belgian 
and Carthusian Martyrologies already noticed, it may b^ 
proper to observe^ that we know not the period in which they 
had been written, or who had been their compilers, and abov^t 
all we are totally unacquainted with the sources from which 
these compilers had drawn their information. These Martyr- 
ologies had, in all probability, been composed in the sixteenth 
century, and the authors of them might have been misin- 
formed; there is, moreover, an important expression contained 
m every one of these documents which cannot, with any pro- 
priety, be passed by unnoticed: an expression amounting to. 
a glaring inaccuracy and in itself sufficient to upset the cre- 
dibility of any evidence. In all of them, be it remarked, 
St. Rumold is represented not only as Bishop, but even as 
Archbishop of Dublin, Now it is beyond all controversy that 
the See of Dublin had not been raised to an archiepiscopal 
rank until the twelfth century (1152), at which time Cardinal 
Paparo arrived in this country and distributed the palliums at 
the Council of Kells,* When absurdities of this description 
are found mixed up with an important public document what 
value can be possibly set upon it? the statement, so far as re- 
gards the rank of the individual, must in the judgment of 
every impartial critic stand rejected. 

Donatus, as has been noticed, was chosen to preside ove 

• Sec Cent. XII. chap. I. 



268 

the' See of Dublin: that be was an Irishman and that he had 
been consecrated in Ireland are facts which cannot upon any 
grounds be disputed.* He go¥erned the See until 1074, 
in which year he died and was buried in his own Cathedral 
of the Holy Trinity, at the right band side of the high altar. 

The consecration of Donatus forms an erent by means of 
which we are enabled to trace the origin of the See of Dub- 
lin; while the incumbency of his successor leads us to sub- 
jects of a more general extent and in some respects inter- 
woven with the character of the Church of Ireland at this 
period. On the death of Donatus the clergy and people of 
Dublin elected an Irishman named Patrick his successor.f 
William the Conqueror had now been seated on the throne of 
England; and Lanfranc, who had come over with the Nor- 
mans, was Archbishop of Canterbury. The Danes of Dub- 
lin, being a colony of Norwegians, looked on the Normans as 
their countrymen; and considering the unbounded sway which 
these people had at that time enjoyed in Britain, the former 
were on that account the more anxious to seize the first op- 
portunity of forming a friendly coirespondence with them. — 
These had been the reasons which urged Gothric their King 
to propose, that Patrick should be sent to Lanfranc for con- 
secration. Accordingly Patrick sailed for England, furnished 
with a letter from the clergy and people of Dublin, in the 
following words :j: '^To the venerable Metropolitan of the holy 
Church of Canterbury, Lanfranc, the clergy and the people 
of the Church of Dublin offer due obedience. It is known to 
your Paternity, that the Church of Dublin, which is the 
metropolis of the island of Ireland, is bereft of its pastor and i 

destitute of a ruler. We have, therefore, chosen a priest, I 

named Patrick, veiy well known to us, of noble birth and 
conduct, versed in apostolical and ecclesiastical discipline, in 
faith a catholic, cautious as to the meaning of the Scriptures 

^ Sec chap. II. t Id. ♦ U.Ikt, Syl. 25. 



269 

and well trained in ecclesiastical dogmas^ who, we requesti 
may be ordained Bishop for us as soon as possible, that un« 
der the authority of God, he may be able to pieside over us 
r^ularly and be useful to us; and that under his government, 
we may be able to combat with ad vantt^e. For the integrity 
of superiors constitutes the safety of the subjects, and where, 
there is the healthfulness of obedience, there, the form of 
instruction is salutary." On the delivery of this letter, Pat* 
rick was received by Lanfranc and shortly after was conser 
crated by him in St. Paul's Church, London. The profes- 
sion of obedience which Patrick made at his consecration was 
as follows:* '^Whoever presides over others ought not to 
scorn to be subject to others, but rather make it his study to 
humbly render, in God's name, to his superiors the obedience 
which he* expects from those who are placed under him. On 
this account, I Patrick, elected Prelate, to govern Dublin' 
the Metropolis of Ireland, do, reverend Father Lanfranc^ 
Primate of the JBritainsf (Britanniarum) and Archbishop of 
the holy Church of Canterbury, offer to thee this charter of 
my profession; and I promise to obey thee and thy successors 
in all things appertaining to the Christian religion." 
- From the tenor of this profession of obedience made by 
Patrick, and especially from his having acknowledged Lan- 
franc as Primate of Great Britain (in the original Britannia- 
rum), some English writers have attempted to maintain, that 
Lanfranc and his predecessors had held a metropolitan juris- 
diction over the Irish Church.;): To support this opinion the 
more forcibly, they have grossly mistranslated the term Bri- 
tanniarum by making it signify the British isles, among which, 
by adopting modern phraseology, Ireland would of course 
be included. If, however, the expression Britanniarum, as it 
stands in the original, be considered, it must be acknow- 
ledged that it signified in reality Great Britain. It was usual 

* Wart's Bishops. t Or, what amounts to the same. Primate of Great Britain, 

t Crcs&y, B. 13. Dr. Milncr's Tour, p. 164. 



270 

with many ancient authors when speaking of Britain to use 
the plural number C Britannia J, and in illustration of this 
several instances might be adduced from Bede. That vene- 
rable writer alluding to the Emperor Claudius says, ''Going 
into Britain (BritanniasX he reduced the most part of the 
iBlaind under his subjection;"* and after having given the ec- 
clesiastical history of every part of Britain, he repeatedly 
uses the plural term Britanniarum.')^ The fact is, when the 
Romans had conquered Britain, they divided the country into 
provinces, and these several provinces went by the names of 
Britannia prima, Britannia secunda, ^c, and hence the 
whole country from north to south was generally known by 
the plural name Britannits, Ireland, however, was at no 
period subject to the Romans, nor was it ever considered a 
part of Britain. During all this time Ireland had her own 
kings, and while Britain was subdued and mutilated, Ire- 
land was a free and an independent nation and was known 
over Europe by the ancient name of Scotia. The Church of 
Ireland also, from the days of her Apostle, had been governed 
by her own Primate ; under his metropolitan jurisdiction had 
her whole hierarchy been placed, nor can the supporters of 
English primatial authority adduce one solitary instance of 
the Archbishops of Canterbury having interfered in the eccle- 
siastical concerns of Ireland before the consecration of Pat- 
rick for the Danish city of Dublin. So iar were the Arch- 
bishops of Canterbury from having' metropolitan authority 
over the Church of Ireland, that their jurisdiction did not, 
in former times, extend even over all Britain* It was ac- 
knowledged only in those places which had been subject to 
the Anglo-Saxons; the British Scots never recognized it, 
while the Northern Picts were, it is well known, always sub- 
ject to the Irish Abbot of Hy. 

* Claudius BHianniat adiens, plurimam insult, partem in dcMiitionem recepit. — 
L. 5. c. 24. 

tid. 



271 

This groundles doctrine was first started durmg the dis- 
putes which had taken place between the Sees of York and 
Canterbuiy relative to the primacy. In 1072 a council had 
been held in Winchester for the purpose of deciding this 
question and at which William the Conqueror was present. — 
As an argument for supporting the cause of Canterbury, it 
was asserted in that Council, that the prelates of Canterbury 
had always enjoyed a metropolitan right not only over the 
churches of Great Britain, but also over those of Ireland;* 
and this assmnption they pretended to establish upon the au- 
thority of Bede. It happens, however, that in all the works 
of that venerable writer, not one sentence appears in support 
of such an assertion. Equally groundless is the opinion of 
those who maintain, that Augustine, who came to Britain in 
the sixth century, was possessed of at least a legatine juris- 
diction over the Irish Church. Augustine never presumed to 
exercise such a power, the prelates and ancient annalists of 
Ireland knew nothing about it, and even supposing that he 
had been invested with such jurisdiction, it by no means fol* 
lows that it should descend to his successors. It was indeed 
at that time imperatively necessary that Augustine should be 
intrusted with legatine authority over Britain,f on account of 
the distracted state of religion in that country and the gene- 
ral decline of morals and discipline which immediately fol- 
lowed the Saxon invasion; but as regards Ireland, no siich 
causes existed. The Irish Church was at that period pre- 
eminently distinguished for both order and discipline; and for 
piety and learning she stood unrivalled among the churches 
of the Christian world. 

The consecration of Patrick by the Archbishop of Canter- 
bury was a proceeding which met at once the general dis- 
pleasure of the Irish prelates; however, the matter had been 
tolerated merely out of respect for Lanfranc's learning and 

• Fleury, L. 61, 51, t W. L. 36. 38. 



272 

eminent character, and as a still further step by which some 
secure and permanent conciliation might be effected between 
the native Irish and the Danes. 

Patrick remained but a short time in Britain. On his rec- 
tum to Ireland he received from Lanfranc the usual testimo^ 
nials of his consecration together with two letters,'"' one ad- 
dressed to Turlogh King of Ireland, and the other to Goth<> 
lie, who, although styled King of the Danes, was at the 
time but merely a vassal^ having submitted to Turlc^ in 
1073. In these letters, and particularly in the one addressed 
to Gk)thric, Lanfranc refers to some abuses which, he undei^ 
stood, had at that time prevailed in Ireland. Instances, he 
says, had occurred of men abandoning their lawful wives 
without assigning any canonical cause, and of taking to 
themselves others who were within the degrees of consangui*- 
nity; and that in Dublin it sometimes happened that men 
even exchanged their wives. 

Had such abominable abuses existed, they certainly must 
have been confined to the Danes^f The chaise, however, 
cannot 1>e consistently supposed to affect any portion of Tur«- 
logh's Irish subjects; particularly when we consider that 
they would have been in open violation of the canons of St. 
Patrick,:]: and that these canons had been looked upon with , 

almost sacred veneration by the native inhabitants of Ireland* i 



•Usher, SyU. No. t6. * 

t Usher, in his note on these letters, remarks, that the custom of dismisnng 
wives was prevalent among the Anglo-Saxons and in Scotland ; a remnant of it may 
be still discerned in England, where wives are to this day sometimes sold in the 
public market. 

X The fifth Canon ordains: " If the wife of any man should commit adultery, the 
injured husband shall not marry another as long as the wife lives ; but should she 
turn from her evil ways and repent, he shall receive her, and she shall serve htm as a 
handmaid and do penance for a whole year on bread and water -, and that by mea« 
sure." And if a woman should attempt to abandon her husband and marry ana- 
ther, she was, by the 19th Canon, excommunicated. " The Christian woman, who 
shall take a man in holy wedlock, and afterwards leave him and in adultery join ano. 
ther, shall for this be ezcommunicated."— 19th of (he Synod of Patrick, Auxilius 
and Iserninus. 



I 



273 

If^ therefore, these abominations had at any time taken place, 
they must be known only amongst the Danes, some of whom 
might not, even as yet, have totally forsaken their long- 
cherished and favourite Scandinavian barbarities. The same 
letter took notice of three other practices and condemned them 
as repugnant to apostolical authority, to the sacred canons 
and to the institutions of all the orthodox Fathers. The 
first was, that holy orders had been administered by bishops 
for money. The second, that bishops had been consecrated 
by only one bishop : and the third, that infants were^ bap- 
tized without the consecrated chrism having been used. The 
first of these abuses alluded to in this letter, if any such had 
taken place, could not by any means be justified. A solitary 
instance might possibly have occuiTed, but there is no other 
authority for its having been practised except this one letter, 
ihe writer of which might have been misinformed. The sub- 
ject of the remaining two charges (it may be proper to ob- 
serve,) could not in those times be considered an abuse, con- 
trary to apostolical authority and to the institutions of the 
Fathers. It frequently happened in those days, that bishops 
had been consecrated in Ireland by only one bishop; but then 
they were the Charepiscopi, not the regular ordinaries of 
Siees;* and it was lawful, in virtue of an ancient canon of 
the Church, to have the Chorepiscopus consecrated by a 
single bishop. Neither could the omission of the chrism in 
baptism be properly called an abuse; the application of it 
being merely a ceremony and by no means essential to the 
validity of the sacitiment. It is well known that in the pri- 
mitive ages of the Church, when baptism had been adminis- 
tered by bishops, the sacrament of confirmation, to which 
chrism was essential, immediately followed. When, how- 
ever, the missionary duties had, in after times, devolved on 
piests, the use of the chrism was still observed, as a cere- 

• See Cent. VIII. 

2 M 



274 

mony io baptism, the priest applying it to the top of the 
head, whereas in confirmation the bishop applies it to the 
forehead of the person about to be confirmed. It is very re- 
markable that Lanfranc had not at that time addressed any 
letter to the Primate or to the prelatea of Ireland on these 
subjects, as he no doubt would have done had he possessed 
either metropolitan or legatine jurisdiction over them. Pat* 
rick governed the See of Dublin until 1084, when he was 
shipwrecked and drowned on his way from that city to Eng- 
land.* 

About this time, various efibrts had been made to enforce 
the doctrine by which some of the popes endeavoured to 
claim a tempoml sovereignty over princes, and to this effect 
Turlogh, who was then at the summit of his power, received 
an epistle from Pope Gregory Vll.f This letter which had 
been dated from Sutri was addressed not only to the Mo- 
narch himself, but likewise to the archbishops, bishops, ab« 
bots, nobles and to all Christians inhabiting Ireland. That 
part of it, in which Gregory insinuates his temporal author- 
ity over Ireland, runs in these words: ''The authority of 
Christ has founded his holy Church on a solid rock, and has 
committed its rights to the blessed Peter, which Church he 
has likewise constituted over all the kingdoms of the world. 
To this Church be has subjected the principalities, powers 
and every thing else which is sublime upon the earth, accord- 
ing to the prophet Isaiah, 'They that slandereth thee shall 
come and shall worship the steps of thy feet/ Therefore, to 
the blessed Peter and bis vicars, among whom by divine dis- 
pensation we happen to be numbered, the whole world owes 
both obedience and reverence, which with a devout mind ye 
shall remember to shew to the holy Roman Church. If, 
therefore, any affairs shall take place amongst ye, which may 
seem to require our assistance, be careful to apply to us at 

• Four Mastcn. t Usher, Syl. No. 29. 



275 

once, and your just demand, with God's help, ye shall ob- 
tain."* It is needless to remark, that this doctrine has no^ 
thing whatever to do with the tenets of the Catholic faith. It 
is merely a school question which had been clamorously agi^ 
tated at subsequent periods; and indeed from the profound 
silence of our annalists as to the result of the letter itself, it 
is manifest that no attention had been paid to it in this king^ 
dom. 

That the Church of Ireland had, in every age since its 
foundatbn, contributed most amply towards the advance^ 
ment of religion and of literature has been already abundantly 
illustrated. By means of its schools and learned professors 
the ancient reputation of the country was still sustained, and 
in the eleventh century, we find Irish ecclesiastics repairing, 
like their predecessors, to the Continent and becoming the 
founders of many valuable and celebrated establishments. — 
Among these the ancient literary foundation of Ratisbon, 
formed by Marianus Scotus, shall be briefly noticed. Mari* 
anus Scotusf (who must not be confounded with the cele* 



* *' Hqjus (Chtisd) auctoHtas s&nctam Ccclesiam m solida petra fuadavU, et bealo 
P«tro ejus Jura commisit, quam etiam super omnia mundi regua constituit eui 
prineipatui, et potestates, et quicquid in secuU sublime videtur esse, subjecit, illo 
Isais completo oraculo ; " venient, inquit, ad te qui detrahebant tibi, et adorabunt 
▼estigia pedum tuorum." Beato igitur Petro ejusque Ticariis, inter quos dispensatio 
diviua noatram quoque sortam annumerari di^Msnit, Gr6ts univereus obedientiam et 
reverentiam debet, quam mente devota sancte Romans Ecclesias exbibere reminia- 
cimini. Si qua vero negotia pebes vos emerserint, quae nostro digna videantur aux- 
ilio, iucunctanter ad nos dirigere atudete, et quod juste postulaveritis, Deo auzili- 
ante, impetrabitis*" — Usher, SyUog. No. 29, 

t The term Seoti was, up to the tenth century, applied eKclusiyely to the natives 
of Ireland. On the overthrow of the Picts and the extinction of their kingdom by 
the Albanian Scots about the year 900, North Britain, the ancient Albania, gra- 
dually assumed the name of Scotia, yet distinguished from the original Scotia (Ire- 
land) by the adjuncts, minor, recentior, Albanetuis &c. However the name 
Scotia or the term Scott bad been but very rarely applied to North fiiitein or to its 
inhabitauts until the reign of Edgar, King of Albania, in the commencement of the 
twelfth century. This Prince, soon after he had ascended the throne, published an 
edict, setting forth the extent and boundaries of his kingdom and by virtue of which 



276 

brated ehronogmpher of that name*) was a native of the 
north of Ireland, and in 1068 withdrew to Germany, bring- 
ing with him two companiona named John and Candidus.i* 
They remained for some time at Ratisbon and afterwards be* 
came Benedictine monks in the Monastery of St. Michael's 
near Bamberg. Marianus, who besides his sanctity had 
been an eloquent and a learned man, obtained soon after a 
grant of the Church of St. Peter near Ratisbon for himself 
and his companions, which was confirmed by Henry lY. then 
King of Germany .j: This Monastery, from the great influx 
of Irishmen who had repaired to it, became in a short time 
so very celebrated and so well suj^lied, that in the com- 
mencemeut of the twelfth century it was found necessary to 
erect another in the city of Ratisbon, which second establish- 
ment was dedicated to St. James. In this manner did the 
ancient foundation of St. Peter become, as it were, the pa* 
rent of numberless religious retreats, by which piety and 
literature had been cherished for ages in that and the adjoin- 
ing territories. This Monastery was particularly celebrated' 
for the number of works, both sacred and profane, which 
had been transcribed by its monks, among whom it may not 
be improper to notice another Marianns, under whom Nicho- 
las Brecspere afterwards Adrian IV. had received his educa- 
tion.^ Marianus the founder continued to govern the Monas- 
tery of St. Peter at Ratisbon, until bis death which occurred 
in 1088. Besides the collection of works which he had 
transcribed, Marianus has left some valuable commentaries 
on the Psalms, deduced, as the preface testifies, from the 
writings of the primitive Fathers of the Church. Thes^ 

that part of Britain wu ia future to be designated by the name of Scotia, Never- 
theless the Irish were, for many years after the death of Edgar, known among the 
learned by the name of Scott, as appears from St. Bernard, from Mauritius de Portu 
(in tit. Script. Oxon.) and others. A learned dissertation on this subject may be 
found in the Collectanea Sacra by Fleming, '* Commentaria ad Vit. S. Columbani.^' 

* See chap, HI. t Bollandistd at 9th Feb. % Colgan. $ Chron. Ratisbon. 



277 

monasteries of Ratisbon, together with those of Wurtzbui^, 
Nuremberg, Viemia and many others, remained in the hands 
of Irish ecclesiastics until they iieere dispossessed by Scotch* 
men. After the death of Marianus, several applicants from , 
Scotland had been kindly received by the Irish monks and 
admitted into the German monasteries. The number of these 
gradually increased, so that in the thirteenth century, when 
the term Scotia ceased to be generally used as a name for 
Ireland, the ungrateful Scotch availed themselves of the ex- 
pression (Scotorum) contained in the original grants, and by 
that means became in a short time the possessors of all these 
foundations. It is needless to add, that the Irish monks 
were, before the close of the thirteenth century, compelled 
to quit those very establishments of which their countrymen 
had been the founders, and which they had both governed 
and adorned for so long a period.'*' 

At this time also, the Irish Monastery of Wurtzburg was 
justly celebrated, and among its distinguished abbots may 
be ranked the learned and venerable Nehemias, who having 
resigned his See of Glendaloch, retired to the Monastery of 
Wurtzburg, where he died, A.D. lOSfi.f 

Meanwhile the reputation of Ireland for learning was still 
supported; and to the ancient schools of Armagh numbers 
of English students had been indebted for their education. 
In 1092, a dreadful conflagration took place in that city, by 
which the third division of the town, usually called 7Vim- 
Saxan (because inhabited by English students) was reduced 
to ashes, j; Many of the other ancient establishments had, as 
well as Armagh, been numerously attended; while literature 
and civilization began to spread rapidly among the Danes, so 
that at the close of the eleventh century, the confusion of 
former times was compelled to give way to national order, 
and Ireland seemed once more to hail the bright prospects 
which were opening upon her. 

• Chron. Ratisbon, t Colgao, A, A, Sv S. p. 200. t Tr. Th. p. 299. 



CHAPTER n. 

Successors of St. Patrick — Episcopal Sees — Religious 
Foundations of the JEleventh Century, 

The forbearance, with which mere laymen had been allowed 
to usurp not only the temporalities but even the title of Arch- 
bishop of Armagh in this century, is a matter which cannot 
be easily accounted for. The country had no doubt been 
distracted by repeated wars between the natives and the 
Danes, and in fact between the Irish princes themselves; it 
is certain, however, that had Brian survived the victory of 
Clontarf these disgraceful abuses, which must have given 
such scandal to the nation, would be at once and effectually 
checked. It has been already stated, that the Primate Mu- 
rechan, after an incumbency of three years, resigned his 
see and in 1001 was succeeded by Maelmury, the son of Eo- 
chad. Some authors are of opinion that Maelmury had been 
one of the lay usurpers. The contrary, however, appears 
from the account given of him by the Four Masters.* Ac- 
cording to their testimony, Maelmury was styled "the head 
of the clergy of Western Europe, the chief of the holy or- 
ders of the West, and a most wise Doctor." These and 
other high encomiums, by which his character stands sup- 
ported, are sufficient to supply the strongest evidence that 
Maelmury had not been a layman, but on the contrary that 
he had been a regularly ordained bishop. He was greatly 
distinguished for his learning and died A.D. 1020. 

Amalgaid is marjced as the successor of Maelmury and 
is generally supposed to be one of the laymen who usurped 

♦Ap.Tr. Tb.p.298. 



279 

the title of Archbishop of Armagh. Colgan strengthens 
this opinion by the fact that two of his successors, Mcehosa 
and Dojnnald, are called the sons of Amalgaid,* and it may 
moreover be remarked that during his time there resided in 
Armagh a regular bishop named Moeltule. This Prelate is 
also styled Bishop of that See, and it appears that the usual 
episcopal duties had been constantly performed by him.f — 
Amalgaid made a visitation over Munster, in which he en- 
forced the observance of what was termed the Law of St. 
Patrick; an usage which referred solely to the temporalities 
of the primatial see. On his decease in 1049 

DuBDALETHE III. who had for many years filled the chair 
of lecturer in Armagh, became his successor. It cannot be 
doubted that Dubdalethe was one of the eight laymen al- 
luded to by St. Bernard. Scarcely had he taken the 
management of the Archdiocess into his hands, when Hugh 
O'Fairreth, who had succeeded him in the professorship, was 
consecrated, and was constantly styled Bishop of Armagh 
until his death, which occurred in 1056.J: Dubdalethe was 
a learned annalist and compiled the annals of the archbishops 
of Armagh down to his own time: he. died most penitently 
in 1064,§ having some time previously resigned the See to 

CuMASACH. This Prelate, who must by no means be con- 
founded with the lay usurpers, continued to govern the arch- 
diocess but a short time. Not long after the death of Dub- 
dalethe, he withdrew from the administration of the diocess, 
when it was usurped (as the Ulster Annals express it) by 

McELiosA, the^son of Amalgaid.|| From the expression em- 
ployed by the annalist, together with the circumstance of hia 
being the son of Amalgaid, it is certain that Mceliosa had 
been one of the Pseudo-Archbishops.lT In 1068 he made a 
circuit through Munster, for the purpose of exacting the 
usual revenues, and held the See until his death in 1091. 

• Tr. Th. p. 302. t Id. p. 298. J Id. $ Annals of Ulster. 

II Ware Bishops, f Tr. Th. p. 31)2. 



280 

DoMKALDy ttUo the son of Amalgaid, usurped the prima* 
tial chair on the death of his brother Mceliosa. He was 
certainly one of the lay intruders and appears to have pos- 
sessed considerable influence among the princes of Ireland. — 
Adopting the example of his predecessor, Domnald made a 
visitation of Munster, Tyrone, and other places, the object 
of which was, as usual, the temporalities of the See. These 
abominable proceedings appear to have at length brought 
down on the people the just indignation of heaven; for in 

1095, a dreadful plague raged throughout the country, which 
swept away such multitudes, that the towns and villi^es be- 
came deserted. To appease the wrath of divine justice, a 
general fast was proclaimed throughout Ireland in the year 

1096, with which both prelates and people strictly complied;* 
and about the same time Coemcomirach O'Boil was conse- 
crated as Sufiragan or actmg Bishop of Armagh. According 
to St. Bernard there had been eight lay usurpers ; four of 
these have been already noticed, while the names of the 
others are not given in any one of our annals. What the 
circumstances were by which this omission had been oc- 
casioned we are not able to determine; it may, however, be 
remarked, that all those pseudo-archbishops, mentioned by 
the annalists, are said to have died great penitents. Dom- 
nald, after having evinced deep sorrow, died at Armagh on 
the 12th of August, A.D. 1105 and with him tenninated 
those enormous abuses by which the Church of Ireland had 
been so long and so grievously distracted. 

The ecclesiastical sees established in the eleventh century 
were those of Dubib and Waterford. 

The See of Dublin was established A.D. 1040, under 
Sitric, King of the Danes, and, as has been already noticed, 
its first Bishop was Donatus, or more correctly Dunan.t — 
Donatus was consecrated in Irektnd, and it is strongly con- 

* AnDalfl of Jnnisfallen. f See chap. I. 



281 

jectnred that he had been a Bishop even before he was 
selected by Sitric to preside over Dublin. Neither in the 
annals of this country or in any other document, is there the 
least intimation jthat Donatus had been consecrated in Can* 
terbnry, and it is most certain that the Danes of Dublin had 
no OQonezion whatever with that metropolitan See until after 
the arrival of the Normans in England, A.D. 1066. On this 
sol^ect Usher observes,* "The Ostmen, who possessed the 
three cities of Dublin, Waterford and Limerick, being a 
colony of Norwegians and so countrymen to the Normans, 
when they had seen England subdued by the Conqueror and 
Normans advanced to the chief archbishopric there, would 
needs now assume to themselves the name of Normans also, 
and cause their bishops to receive their consecration from no 
other Metropolitan but the Archbishop of 'Canterbury. And 
forasmuch as they ^ere confined within the walls of their 
own city, the bishops whom they made had no other diocess 
in which they might exercise their jurisdiction except the bare 
circuit of these cities." Thi^ new See of Dublin, as well as 
the Danish power itself, was greatly circumscribed; nor did 
it extend beyond the walls of the city until some years after 
the council of Kells in 1152* 

After Donatus had, with the £M»sistance of Sitric, finished 
his Cathedral of the Holy Trinity (Christ Church) and a 
chapel called St. Michael's, he erected an episcopal palace 
near it, on the site where the former Four Courts stood. — 
Donatus continued to preside over the See of Dublin until 
1074, in which year he died and was buried in his own 
Cathedral. 

As the events of the See of Dublin become, afl^r thia 
period, closely interwoven vrith other portions of our eccle* 
siastical history, and are, moreover, intrinsically interesting, 
it will be necessary in the future arrangement of this work, 

* Discourse on tbe Religion, kc. chap. VIII. 

2 N 



282 

to attend carefully to -Ifae order of episcopal euccessioa in 
that See as well as to the leading occurrences connected 
with it. 

Patrick, or acconding to the Four Masters, Gilla-Pat- 
RiCK, the successor of Donatus in 1074 was, as has been al- 
ready stated, shipwrecked and drowned on the 10th of Octo- 
ber, A.D. 1084 * 

Immediately on the death of Patrick, Donat, or Do- 
ivouGH O'Haingly, an Irishman, was promoted to the See 
of Dublin.f In compliance with the wishes of the Danes, 
Donat was sent to England for consecration, having been 
furnished with letters from Turlogh, Monarch of Ireland. — 
Donat was kindly received by Laniranc and was consecrated 
by him in the Cathedral Church of Canterbury* He made 
his profession of obedience in the following terms: **I, Do- 
natus, Prelate of the Church of Dublin, which ir situated 
in Ireland, promise canonical obedience to thee, * Lanfranc, 
Archbishop of the holy Church of Canterbury, and to thy 
successors." This Prelate continued to govern the See of 
Dublin until his death in 1095 and was succeeded by his 
nephew, Samuel O'Haingly. 

Samuel, on his appointment was (agreeably to the Danish 
custom) sent over to Canterbury to be consecrated by Anselm, 
who had succeeded Lanfranc in the government of that 
Archdiocess. At his consecration Samuel made the following 
profession of obedience :;[: ^'I, Samuel, chosen for the 
government of the Church of DubUn which is situated in 
Ireland, and to be consecrated Bishop by thee, Reverend 
Father Anselm, Archbishop of the holy Church of Canter- 
bury and Primate of all Britain, do promise that I will ob- 
serve canonical obedience in all things to thee and to all thy 
successors." 

In the early part of Samuel's incumbency, he received 

• Sec chap. I. t Ware's Bishopa. j Ap. Uiher, Syl. 



283 

an epistle from Anselm, in which that Prelate proceeds to 
make three very serious complaints: first, that Samuel had 
given to strangers the books, vestments and Church orna- 
ments which Lanfranc had presented to his uncle Donatus, 
for the use of the Chucch of the Holy Trinity in Dtublin.-T- 
3econdIy, that he removed the monks who performed the 
offices of said Churchy and that he refused to receive those 
who were willing to return. And, third^, he adds, *' I have 
also heard, that you cause the cross to be carried before you 
on the way, which; if true, I cqnunandlyounot to reiterate; for 
this privilege Soes not belong to. any one except to an arch^ 
bishop, who has been confirmed with the pall by the Roman 
. Pontic Nor is it fit, that by any presuxnption relative to 
an unusual thing, you should appear remarkable or repre- 
hensible before men."* This letter was directed to Malchus^ 
then Bishop of Waterford, with directions to deliver it in 
person to Samuel and expostulate with hipi on the impro? 
priety of these abuses* The epistle, thus conveyed in fatherly 
terms, had the desired efiect, and Samuel presided over the 
See of Dublin until his death, which occurred on the 4th of 
July, A.D. 1121.+ 

Tqb Sbe of Watbrford was founded in the eleventh 
century, Malchus being elected its first Bishop by the clergy 
and people of that city ; which election was approved of by 
Murtogh O'Brian, then King of Ireland, by Domnaid, 
Bishop of Gashel and by several other prelates, of the king- 
dom. According to Eadmer and other contemporary autho- 
rities, Malchus was a native of Ireland and had spent several 
years as a Benedictine monk at Winchester.;^ Although 
Waterford had been founded by the Danes and was still in 
the possession of that people, yet it appears to have been at 
this time subject to Murtogh. The inhabitants desirous to 
follow the example of their countrymen in Dublin, proposed 

• Usher, Syl. 39. f Ware's Bishops. t Eadmer's Hist. No\. L. 2. 



284 

that Malchus should be consecrated in Canterbury; for which 
purpose they petitioned Murto^ O'Brian, requesting that he 
would unite with them in a letter to that eiect. To this re- 
quest Murtogh assented, and in 1096 Malchus repaired to 
England bearing with him a letter lor Ansdm, and to which 
the King and several bishops had annexed their signatures* 
After stating in this epistle the many spiritual disadvantages 
under which the people of Waterfonl were placed, in not hav*- 
ing a bishop residing amongst them, they conclude in these 
words: ''Therefore, we (the clergy and the people of the 
town of Waterford) together with our King, Murtogh, the 
Bishop Domnald* and Dermod our Duke, brother of the 
King, have chosen this priest Malchus, a monk of the Bishop 
Walchelin of Winchester, very well known to us, of noble 
birth and morals, versed in apostolical and ecclesiastical dis- 
cipline and in faith a Oatholic." Accordingly Malchus was 
consecrated by Anselm at Canterbury on the 28th of Decem- 
ber, 1096, Ralph, Bishop of Chichester and Gundulph Bishop 
of Rochester being the assistant Bishops.t His profession 
of obedience runs thus: ''I, Malchus, elected for the Church 
of Waterford and to be consecrated Bishop by thee. Reverend 
Father Anselm, Archbishop of the holy Church of Canter- 
bury and Primate of all Britain, do promise that I will ob^ 
serve canonical obedience in all things to thee and to all thy 
successors." Shortly after his consecration Malchus, with 
the assistance of the Danes, erected a splendid cathedral in 
Waterford and dedicated it to the Holy Trinity. This- cathe- 
dral was endowed by King John in the commencement of the 
thirtheenth century, at which time also its Dean and Canons 
had been instituted; but the possessions expressed in the 
charter were not confirmed until the time of Pope Innocent 
III, A.D. 1210.$ 
The Sbe of Ardfert had, according to the annals of 

• Bishop of Cuhcl. i Ware Bishops. t Ware Antiq. c. XXIX. 



285 

Innisiallen, been governed by bishops in tke eleventh < 
yet its origin remains involved in great obscarity. >S^e 
writers have named Ert, the master of St. Brendan, as hav- 
ing presided over it in the sixth century; they have not, how-* 
ever, been able to support their opimon, and hence the sub* 
ject remains wmpt up in much uncertainty^ Had Ardfert 
been established as a permanent See in the days of St. Bren« 
dan, it is sii^ularly nnaccounrtable that not even one of its 
prelates had been named from that time down to the eleventh 
century, indmding a period of about five hundred years. — 
There had, in all probability, been some bishc^s residing in 
Ardfert during that intermediate time, without having either 
a re^lar succession or a permanently established see, as had 
been, the case in Swords, Lusk, Glondalkin and ol&er places. 
When, however, the Danish people of Dublin and of Water- 
ford had procured for themselves a bishop, it may be reason*- 
ably supposed that the Irish, who inhabited this extensive 
portion of the south, felt considerable solicitude for obtain- 
ing a similar advantage. At all events there can be no doubt, 
that Ardfert had been placed under the administration of a 
bishop at the period of which we are now treating. Dermot 
Mac-Mel-Brenain was Bishop of Ardfert about the middle 
of the eleventh century. This Prelate governed the See un- 
til 1075, in which year he died and was succeeded by Ma- 
grath O'Ronan,* whose incumbency continued until 1099 
when he was succeeded by Mac-Ronan. This latter Prelate 
has been styled Bishop of Kerry and was present at the 
Synod of Kells, in 1162.t 

Hie history of the monastic establishments presents in 
general, during the greater part of the .eleventh century, one 
frightful scene of pillage and destruction. In 1016 the 
Danes, under their King Sitric, plundered Kildare, Gienda- 
loch, Clonard, Swords and Armagh.J The island of Arran 

* Annals of Innisfal. A. 1075. t Ware Bishops. } Annals of Innisfal. 



386 

of the Saints, in which stood the celebrated establishment of 
St. Enda, was taken by the Danes of Limerick, and that 
ancient Monastery with its church, library and schools, was 
lerelled to the ground.* Ardbraccan, Ardfert and lismore 
were pillaged three times within the lapse of one year; while 
the Monastery of Clonmacnois was plundered and almost de* 
molished no less than thirteen times during the eleventh cen-> 
tury.f Amidst these awfiil scenes, the usual duties of these 
institutions must, at least for a time, have been suspended ; 
however, many of the other establishments had been suflPered 
to continue in comparative tranquillity. When al length 
these Northmen had been in a manner humanized by the 
influence of religion, and when law and justice b^an to be 
known and respected amongst them, these retreats of sanctity 
were no longer molested, and the customary instructions 
were imparted to students, both natives and foreigners, as 
amply as they had been in preceding ages. 

* Awuh of Munater. f Tr. Th. p. 639. Foot Maaten. 



CHAPTER III. 

Religious and Littrafy Characters of the Eleventh CeU" 
tury — General Observations. 

Notwithstanding the melancholy state of the nation, the 
Irish Church had^ in the eleventh century, been distinguished 
for enlightened ecclesiastics, and among these shall be 
ni^iced, in the first place, the pious and learned Marianus 
SooTus, generally styled the Chronographer. 

This eminent n^im was a native of Ireland and was bom in 
the year 1028.* Being desirous to retire from the world and 
to devote himself to study and prayer, Marianus entered the 
Monastery of Clonard in 1052, in which celebrated establish- 
ment he continued for four years. Influenced by the example 
of many of his countrymen, Marianus at length formed the 
design of withdrawing for ever from his native country, — 
Agreeably to this resolution, he arrived at Col<^e in 1056 
and soon after joined the Irish monks of St. Martin in that 
city. Here he remained until 1058 about which time, having 
been ordained priest at Wurtzbui^b, be removed to Pader- 
bom dnd from thence to Fulda.t It is most probable that 
this had been the place in which he collected and arranged 



* It IB nxhtr amumnnf to witness the gravity with which some Scotch writers pre- 
tend to maintain that Marianus Scotns was a British Scot, that is, according to 
modem phraseology, a Scotchman. Among these, Mackenrie appears to have 
handled the subject with real composure and downright earnestness in his Lives of 
iks Wtiun of ths ScoU Niition. However, Florence of Worcester, who was con- 
temporary with Marianus, is an authority at once conclusive ; his words are : " Hoc 
anno (1028) natus est Marianus Hibemeniit Scotus, cujus studio et labore hoec 
chronica pnscellens est de diversis libris coadunata." Dupin, Moreri, Labbe, De 
Scriptor. Eccles. afford a similar testimony. 

t Florence of Worcester. 



288 

the materials for his chronicle; a work which, in its kind, far 
surpasses any thing which the middle ages have produced. — 
For the purpose of completing it he became a rechise for ten 
years, and although immured in study and shut out from all 
human intercourse, yet the fame of his virtues and of his ex- 
traordinary learning made its way beyond the solitary edl, 
and among his admirers were many of the most distinguished 
prelates of that country. At length this extraordinary man 
was brought from his favourite retirment by orders of the 
Bishop of Mentz and of the Abbot of F^14l^ and in 1069 he 
removed to Mentz, where^ as he himself expresaes it, he was 
again shut up, on the 10th of July in. that year. Marimnos 
remained in Mentz until 1086, in which year he died and was 
buried in the Church of St Martin beyond the walls of that 
city."*" Besides his chronicle, which he had brought down to 
his own time,, and which has been continued to A.D. 1200 1^ 
Dodechin, Abbot of St. Deslbod ; Marianus has writtenf 
The Hamumy of the Eoang.eUsts, Of the Universal Accoooi, 
On the great Paschal Cycle, i\mendments to DionysiuA^ A 
Breviaiy on St. Luke, Annotaticsia an the Scriptures, Letters 
of Exhortation, Commentaries on the Psalms, Annotations 
on all the Epistles of St. Paul, together with a copy of said 
Epistles transcribed by himself^ which is extant inthe.im- 
peiial library of Vienna* J 

While Marianus had been thus employed in Germany, 
TiOBRNACH O'Braoin, the distinguished annalist of Ire* 
land and Abbot of Clonmacnois, was by his talents and 
unwearied research casting new light on the ancient records 
of his own country. It is indeed much to be regretted, that 
the history of this annalist has not been circumstantially 
handed down to us. Tigernach belonged to a sept which 
inhabited an eastern part of Connaught, most probably the 

* MabilloD, Annal. Ben. t Bale. X Labbe. Com. Bib. 



289 

now Gounty of Roscommon;* he had for some years been 
Abbot of Roscommon and aflerwatds became Abbot of 
GlonmaiCnois. It was in this latter monastery he compiled 
hia celebrated Annals of Ireland, which he brought down to 
the year of hit death, A.D. 1088. Very high and well 
nerited encomiums have proceeded from the pen of both 
ancient and modem antiquaries on this invaluable work.f-^- 
Tigernach died at Clonmacnois, A.D. 1088. 

Hblias, the saintly and learned Abbot of St. Martin's at 
Cologne, was an Irishman and flourished in this century. — 
About the year 1022, he had been at Rome and was the first 
who had brought from that city the Roman note or Church 
music to Cologne.:!: Before he retired to the Continent 
Helias had spent some years in the Monastery of Monagfaan; 
(be rigid discipline of which he punctually observed and 
afterwards most strictly enforced. The value which this 
great man had placed on the virtue of obedience was such, 
that when, on one occasion, a member of the community in 
Cologne had, without asking permission, transcribed a neat 
copy of the Missal for the use of the monastery, Helias con- 
signed it to the flames, lest others, by following his example, 
should presume-in any manner to infringe on the ancient disH 
cipline of the institute.^ Helias was likewise a learned 
lecturer; and to him and his community had society been in^- 
debted for the transcription of several valuable portions of 
both sacred and profane literature. Having spent a life of 
mortification and sanctity he died at Cologne, A.D. 1042. 

JoHK, the venerable Bishop of Mecklenbui^h and Apostle 

* Annals of Innisfal. 

t Among others, Mr. D'AUon, m his Ertay on Irkh History, observes : " TBe 
pages of this writer (Tigemach) are frequently illustrated by quotations from Latin 
«nd Greek authors ; as, V. G. Horace, Virgil, Pliny, Eusebius, Origen, St Jerome» 
iulius Africanus, AnatoHus, Bede, &c. , whom he not only quotes with accuracy, 
but frequently balances and contrasts their authority with much critical acumen." 

t Mabtllon, at A. 1022. § Florence of Worcester. 

2o 



290 

of Sclavonia was a native of Ireland and floamhed hi tbe 
middle of the eleventh century.* About the year 1067, he 
arrived in Germany and was soon after placed over the See of 
Mecklenburgh by Adalbert, Archbishop of Bremen. The 
Vandals and the Venuli, who inhabited that part of the an- 
cient Sclavonia which lies between the Elbe and tbe Vistula, 
were at this time pi^ns; thither, therefore, John went to 
preach the Gospel in 1062. After having traversed the 
greater part of that trackless region and having visited their 
principal towns, in which he converted great multitudes, John 
at length suffered martyrdom at Rethre their capital. By the 
orders of a pagan governor he was first cast into prison, and 
after having endured a variety of torture, was at length be- 
headed about the year 1065. Adam of Bremen, Trithemiusf 
and other writers make honourable mention of this Martyr, 
and he has been always considered the Apostle and Patron 
of that ancient and extensive territory. 

While these writers bear high testimony to the apostolic 
labours and sufferings of John; Surius, Johannes Stabius and 
others are equally ardent in praise of his countryman Col- 
MAX. This holy man departed from Ireland about the year 
1022 for the purpose of visiting Jerusalem*. Having per- 
formed his devotions at Mecklin, Saltzburg and other places, 
he at length arrived at Stockeran, a small town in the eastern 
territory of Norica, now Lower Austria. At that time the 
Austrians were at war with the Moravians, and so furious had 
been the spirit with which hostilities had been carried on, 
that no quarters were given on either side. Colman had 
scarcely reached Stockeran, when he was seized as a spy em- 
ployed by the Moravian party; and although he persisted in 
declaring his innocence and had given a true account of him- 
self, he was, nevertheless, cast into prison and afterwards put 
to death. Several contemporary chroniclers bear testimony 

• Flcury, L. 61 . f Chron. 106&. 



291 

to the miracles which had been wrought through the interce^ 
sion of this Saint, and particularly in the place where he 
sufiered. About three years after, Henry, Marquis of Austria, 
caused the body to be removed to Medlicum (Melck); when 
it was found entire and deposited with great solemnity in St. 
Peter's Church in that town, on the 7th of October, A.D. 
1026.* This Saint has been styled the Patron of Lower 
Austria,t and his name occurs in the Roman Martyrology at 
the 13th of October. 

iThe ancient annals of Ireland furnish a long catalogue of 
eminent teachers, who, during the eleventh century, had 
given instructions at Clonard, Clonmacnois and other estab- 
lishments, j: Of these professors we have nothing recorded 
save a lengthened list of names, accompanied by some occa- 
sional epithet which serves only to indicate their merit. Im- 
perfect, however, and unsatisfactory as this catalogue— this 
remnant of former days may appear, it furnishes ample and 
undeniable evidence, that the cultivation of letters had, in 
this age, been carefully attended to in Ireland; when, as is 
well known, it had been disregarded and almost totally 
neglected in many of the other kingdoms of Europe. 

* MftbUloD, Aniwl Ben. f Colgan, A. A. S. S. p. 10& 

X AiduB, Bishop, Scholastic and professor at Armagh, died A. D. 1005. O'FIaa*. 
•gan, ChroDOgnpher and Antiqiiaiy of Ireland, died A. D. 1004. Crichen, Bi- 
shop and lecturer of Theology at Armagh, died A. D. 1011. Kenfelad, Scribe 
and lecturer of Philosophy at Armagh, died A. D. 1012. Dunchad, Scholastic 
and professor at Clonmacnois, died A. D. 1005. Cathasach, Philosopher and lec«> 
turer at Clonmacnois, died A. D. 1006* Mac-Cethenin, styled the Wisest Doc- 
tor of the West, taught at Armagh and died A. D. 1030. Miclodar, Scholastic and 
lecturer at Killachid, died A. D. 1032. Corcran, the learned Theologian of lis- 
more, taught there and died A.D. 1040. LoDgsech, Theologian and leeturer at CIo** 
nard, died A. D. 1042. O'Ballen, Scholastic and professor at Roscrea, died A.D. 
1047. Kieran, Scholastic and lecturer of Kells, died A. D. 1061 . Mac-Dorighal, 
Scholastic and lecturer of Kildare, died A. D. 1063. O'Clothocain, Scholastic 
and professor at Armagh, died A. D. 1071. Conchobran» Scribe and lecturer of 
Gleanussen, died A. D. 1082. Mflsliosa O'Brolcan, whom the Annals of Innisfal- 
len style " the most venerable man in Ireland -, the most learned of his day in wis* 
dom and science," died A. D. 1086. 



292 

The l^gal ecclesiastical tribute, usually deucmimafted ''the 
law of St Patrick/' took its rise from certain political events 
connected with the local government of Hugh Ollain, Moor 
arch of Ireland in the eighth century. If the observations^ 
which we have already ventured to offer on that sid>ject^ 
should seem to require any further illustration,* let the histcMy 
of the See of Aimagh dorii^ the eleventh century be pn>* 
dueed, and the truth of these positions can be no longer dis- 
puted. The union of any ecclesiastical establishment with 
temporal power must engender materials, which at (me time 
or other will explode; and again, a church overburdened with 
riches and arrayed in worldly pomp, instead of b^n^ baiefi- 
cial, will be an evil and must at length be the fruitful source 
of some dreadful catastrophe. In the fifth, sixth and sev^fith 
centuries, when the Church of Ireland was comparatively 
poor and d^iended on the voluuitary but sufficient donations 
of the fiButhful, we had practical religion, and Ireland was a 
land of saints. Scarcely, however, had this same church 
been brought into contact with the ruling power — scarcely 
had the tide of mammon 'set in, when the frightful inunda- 
tion, drifting on its surface every thing sacred and venerable, 
soon rose to the treshold of the sanctuary, and the temple of 
peace was at once converted into a scene of anarchy and 
desolation. The Church of Armagh had her saints in the 
days of holy poverty; while in opulence and grandeur she 
became a sacrilegious monopoly in the hands of irreligious 
and scandalous usurpers. Nor are these direful effects of 
overgrown ecclesiastical wealth to be discovered exclusively in 
the Church of Ireland: they may be traced in the history of 
every nation on earth. What gave rise to Arian blas- 
phemies and Greek Schisms? What disfigured Germany 
with wars and bloodshed, and disgraced France with infidel- 
ity and revolution?— and what brought towering ambitious 

• See Cent, IX. chap. 2. 



293 

spirits iato the sanctuary of mysteries and afterwards trans- 
formed them into blasphemers and heresiarchs? The truth 
therefore of that general principle, which has been placed at 
the head of these brief remariu, rests on undoubted histori- 
cal evidence — it becomes in reality a moral axiom, and it is 
certain that an ecclesiastical establishment bound up with 
state policy or overburdened with wealth, must at length give 
rise to some dreadful explosion, in which religion will inevi- 
tably suffer, while both individual prosperity and national 
independance may, in all probability, be swept away for 
ever. 

Among the principal interesting objects contemplated in 
this analysis of Irish ecclesiastical history, the superior bene^ 
fits arising from public gratuitoua education have been 
pointed out with particular attention. A revision, therefore, 
of this most important subject may not be deemed improper 
in this place. It may recal to our minds the character of the 
ages over which we have travelled, and at the same time it 
ynU serve to throw new light on many of the historical events 
of succeeding c^turies* In the first place, public gratuitous 
education, aided by a priesthood humble and disengaged 
from the world, was one of the principal ordinary means by 
which the conversion of Ireland had b^en effected. Secondly, 
the same gratuitous education filled the monastery with 
scholars, supplied the mission with an enlightened clergy, 
caused religion to appear in its loveliness, made its counsels 
be embraced by multitudes and transformed the country into 
a land of penitents and saints. Thirdly, it created a high 
national reputation for Ireland — it brought the distant 
stranger to our shores — ^it sent him home with a mind en- 
lightened by knowledge and a heart warmed with gratitude — 
and it elicited many a lofty and well merited panegyric in 
favour of our country from some of the most distinguished 
writers of Europe. And, fourthly, it emboldened the Irish 
ecclesiastic to leave his native land and to encounter the 



294 

difficttltms of a foreign mission ; it made some of them the 
apostles of nations and others the revivers of literature. For 
these reasons it was, that the ancient fathers of the Irish 
Church had been so very solicitous in upholding the noble 
system of public gratuitous education. Hence, likewise, 
it was, that each monastery had been a semmary of learning 
and that these establishments were cherished and venemted 
by all that was g|reat or virtuous in the land. Nor did edu- 
cation and literature cease in Ireland even in those angry days, 
when the storm rolled in all its fury and when society pre- 
sented the appearance of one tottering, crumbling mass of 
ruin. During the highest rage of Danish power, the literary 
establishments were not totally deserted; many of the ancient 
schools of the kingdom were frequented, and we find that 
even at the close of the eleventh century, Armagh was still 
the great literary rendezvous of foreign students and particu- 
larly of Englishmen. Such had been the progress of educa- 
tion up to this period: whether it advanced or was suffered 
to decline in after times, the reader will be best enabled to 
judge from a perusal of the subsequent pages. 



TWELFTH CENTURY. 
CHAPTER I. 

CelsHs Archbishop of Armagh — Synods of Usneach and 
Rath'Breastil — SU Malachy Bishop of Connor — tran^ 
kUed to Armagh — his apostolical labours — Synod of Kelts 
— Distribution of the Palliums — Henry II — Means em* 
ployed by that Monarch to obtain the Bull of Adrian IV. 
English Invasion — Strongbow lands in Ireland — Arrival 
of Henry II at Water ford — Synod of Cashel — Cardinal 
Vunan and the Synod of Dublin — St. Laurence O* Toole, 
Legate Apostolic — John Cumin, Archbishop of Dublin — 
Convenes a Synod — Albin O'Mulloy and CRraldus Cam^ 
brensis — Translation of the remains of Sts. Patrick, Bri- 
gid and ColumbhiU — State of the Church of Ireland at 
the close of the twelfth century. 

The ecclesiastical as well as the political events of the 
twelfth century form a new and an important era in the annals 
of the Church of Ireland. During the Danish invasions^ 
comprehending a period of more than two hundred years, 
one scene of terror was followed by another in rapid succes- 
sion, while the interests of religion, as it is natural to expect, 
had been grievously affected; however, in the year 1100 the 
darkened storm seemed at length to subside and a prospect 
more bright and cheering appears once more to open upon 
our view. In the year 1105, Celsus was Archbishop of 
Armagh.* This learned and good man, having been the 
grandson of Meeliosa of Armagh, was consequently a mem- 

• Tr. Th. p. 299. 



296 

ber of the family by whtcli that See had been so long mono- 
polized.* The scandal which these intraders had for so 
many years occasioned was a subject of much uneasbess to 
Celsus; and accordingly after his consecration on the 23rd 
of September in said year he entered on his ministry, with a 
firm resolve of putting an end to this system of vile and un- 
canonical usurpation. For this purpose he undertook, in 
1106| a general visitation of the Province of Ulster, in which 
district, as being mote contiguous to Armagh and under the 
immediate influence of those pseudo-prelates, a greater laxity 
of ecclesiastical discipline had, it seems, prevailed. Here he 
catechised, preached and laboured; and the counsels which 
he delivered derived new eflicacy from the example of his 
ovm charity and disinterestedness. From the north Celsus 
directed his course to Munster and Connaught, the entire of 
which Provinces he visited,t and then returned to Armagh, 
confident that Providence would, in the proper season, crown 
all his labom*s with success. 

Celsus had, during his visitation, seen the necessity of 
two essentially important measures. The fiirst was the con- 
vocation of a national Synod, in which the actual state of 
the Irish Church might be regularly taken into consideration. 
The second was the appointment of an archbishop for the 
southern half of Ireland, and who, besides being an assistant 
to him, would moreover have the responsible government of 
that extensive portion of the country. These measures, ex*- 
pedient and salutary as they had been, met at once with the 
concurrence not only of the prelates of the kingdom but also 
of Murtogh O'Brian, then Monarch of Ireland. 

Accordingly in the year 1111, a general national synod waft 
held at a place called Fiadh-mac-Aengusa (Usneach), now the 
hill of Usney, in the Barony of Rathconrath and County of 
Westmeath.:}: At this Synod^ Celsus the Primate attended^ 

• See Cent, XI. chap. 2. t Tr. Th. p. 299. $ Id. Four Masters. 



297 

together with Moelmurry O'Dunain Archbishop of Cashel^ 
and, acc(Hrding to the Annals of lanisfallen, f^fifty other 
bishops, three hundred and seventeen priests, one hundred 
and sixteen deacons and a vast number of clergy of inferior 
degree.'' Murtogh O'Brian, the Monarch was also present, 
and all the princes of his kingdom. Besides the revision' 
which the existing ecclesiastical di^cipline of Ireland had jiin* 
dergone in this Synod and the sanction of new laws for the 
reguls^tion of the clergy and people, a most important mea-> 
sttie had been effectjed, by raising the dipcess of Casbel 
to the rank of an archiepiscopal and metropoKtan see; yet 
with this condition, that it was to be subordinate to 
the primatial one of Armagh.* Donatus O'Heine, the pre- 
decessor of Moelnrarry bad enjoyed that title at the close o# 
the deventh century. It was still further conArmed in 1101, 
when Murtogh made over Cashel, hitherto the royal seat ot 
the kings of Muni^r, {to the Church.t Neyertheless, it was 
but a mere honorary appellation, a certain mark of prece*- 
dency, without having any metrppoHtan authority or canon^ 
kal jurisdiction annexed to it However, by this act of Cel- 
sus and the Synod together with the subsequent confivmation 
of Innocent II., Cashel became in reality an archiepiscopaF 
See; the archbishop of which was charged with the care of 
the south or southern half, while the Primate reserved to him- 
self the northern half^ together with the primatial authority 
over all Ireland.^: From the decrees passed at this Synod, 
the most salutary effects were soon visible, and the Church 
of Ireland at length enjoyed repose, while its clergy were 
basily employed in repairing those breaches which discipline 
and morality had undergone during the distracted affaiis of 
the last two centuries. 

Celsus was still intent on further improvements. The num- 
ber of small or minor sees, to which the usages of former 

• St. Bernard, Vit. S. Mai. f Keating, B. 2. t St. Bernard, loc. cit, 

2 p 



298 

years had given rise, was soon found to have been the cause 
of much inconvenience. To remedy this, by fonning a re- 
gular division of diocesses and marking out the respective 
boundaries of each, Celsus convened another synod in 1118 
at Rath-Breasail, now Clanbrassil, in the Coimty of Ar- 
magh** Gillebert had been Bishop of Limerick since 1106 
and some time after was appointed legate apostolic for Ire- 
land by Pope Pascal ILf In this capacity he presided at 
the Synod, at which were also present Celsus, MoBliosa 
Archbishop of Cashel and a number of other bishops and 
clergy of various ranks. According to the decrees of this 
Synod, the number of diocesses in Ireland vres reduced to 
twenty-four, besides Dublin, which was still left subject to 
Canterbury. Twelve of these sees were in the northern half, 
subject to the Archbishop of Armagh; the remaining twelve 
were in the south, subject to the Archbishop of Cashel. The 
order in which they are placed, is as follows: In Ulster were 
five sees, viz., Clogher, Ardsrath (Ardstraw, County of Ty- 
rone), Derry, Connor and Down. In Connaught five, viz., 
Tuam, Clonfert, Cong (m the County of Mayo), Killala and 
Ardcarn (in the County of Roscommon). In Meath were 
the sees of Duleek and Clonard, and which henceforth were 
to be the only permanent sees in that territory. These twelve 
sees were placed under the jurisdiction of the Archbishop of 
Armagh. The twelve subject to Cashel were: In Munster — 
Lismore, Waterford, Cork, Rath-maighe, Deisgirt (Ardfert), 
Limerick, Killaloe and Emly; and in Leinster — Ossory,^: 
Leighlin, Kildare, Glendaloch and Fems.§ It appears, like- 
wise, by an act of this Synod, ''that the revenues of the 
cleigy and the Church lands were confirmed to the several 
bishops of Ireland for the maintenance and support of the 
episcopal character; which lands were to be exempted from 

• Tr. Th. p. 293. t Sec chap. II. 

) In Keatiiig's list the Sec is called KUkenoy. $ Keating, B. 2. 



i 



299 

tribute, chief I'ents and other public contributions, and to 
remain in that state of freedom and independence for CTer/'* 
After some other decrees regarding morals and discipline had 
been enacted, the Legate closed the Synod by pronouncing a 
blessing on those who should observe its ordinances, and on 
the other hand a malediction on such as should presume to 
infringe upon them. 

This latter Synod has brought us to that portion of our 
national history, in which the great St Malachy must ne- 
cessarily be introduced. Regarding the eventful life of this 
holy man, those passages only shall be here noticed, without 
which the chain of historical narrative would be unconnected 
i^id incomplete; while a more circumstantial account of his 
apostolical labours i^all be reserved for a fature chapter.f 

After Malachy had been ordained priest by Gelsus about 
the year 1120, he repaired to Lismore, for the purpose of 
completing those theological studies which he had already 
commenced under the pious and learned Imar of Armagh. — 
Meanwhile Celsus, whose esteem for Malachy was very 
greaty had to contend with many difficulties, which at length 
obliged him to write to Lismore, and the return of Malachy 
to his native diocess was the consequence. At that time the 
Monastery of Bangor was in ruins, and the lands belonging 
to it were in the possession of a maternal unde of Malachy ; 
thither, therefore, the Saint repaired, fully determined on 
re-establishing that venerable retreat of sanctity and learning. 
His uncle, who afterwards became a monk in that establish- 
ment, listened attentively to his expostulations and at once 
resigned the whole concerns into his hands. Malachy, how- 
ever, deeming such ample possessions aa inconsistent with 
the spirit of sacred poverty, refused to reeeive these lands 
and was content with the mere site on which the ancient 
monastery stood. In a short time an humble cloister and an 

* Keatbg, B. 2. t See chap. III. 



300 

oratory were oompletedi aad thue did Malacby^ at the bead 
of a small comiauaity, ro*e8tafalifth the ancient di8cq)li]ie d 
Bangor^ ei^tly ae it bad been in former days.* 

The See of Connor had at this time (1127) become yacant. 
Malachy^ although unanimously chosen and uigently solicited 
to undertake its government, penisted in declining that 
honour^ until at Itogth the absolute command of Celsus was 
found necessary, and the reasonable orders of the superior 
wefe instantly fallowed by the cheerful acquiescence of the 
bumble intns^te of Bangor.f Celsus, whose constitution had 
been worn down by care and imremitted labour, had pre- 
determined on appointing Malachy his successor; which re- 
solution he put bto effect in 1129, exactly two years after 
Malachy had been consecrated Bishop of Connor. la that 
year Celsus died at a place called Ardpatrick, in the now 
County t>f Limerick. On his death-bed, he af^inted Ma- 
lachy his successor and chaiged the clergy who were present 
and the Bang of Munster, in whose house he then rettded, 
to see this his last request execnted. On this occasion, also^ 
he sent to Malabhy his staff or crosier, as a pro<tf of his 
most earnest and dying wishes. 

The news of the Primate's death had scarcely reached 
Annngh, when the same turbulent iaction, re*commencing 
the scenes of past times, tozed upon the title and temporal*- 
Uies of the Archdiocess and placed Maurice, the son of 
Domnald, a lay man, in the metropolitan chair. So great 
wad the tiolenee with which this party had then maintained 
their sacrilegiously usurped authority, that three years had 
ielapsed before the legate apostolic with the bishops of the 
province had ventured to insist on the translation of St. Ma- 
lachy. The Saint at length complied, yet on this condition, 
that he should, when peace was re-established in Armagh, 
be allowed to return to his former diocess of Connor, or as 

• St. Bernard, Vit. Mai. t Tr. Th. p. 300. 



301 

he himself expresses it, ^^to his former spouse and to his be- 
loved state of poverty. Accordingly in 1132, Malachy re- 
moved to Armagh, bat was obliged to reside at some distance 
from the city until the death of the usurper, which occurred 
about two years afterwards.* It would be impossible to 
eater into a minute detail of the trials and sui&rings which 
Malachy had undergone during the three years which he spent 
in the government of the archiepiscopal See. He had, how- 
ever, the consolation bf at length beholding the happy suc- 
cess of his labours, in the re-establishment of order, mora* 
lity and discipline, and above all in the final extinction of 
those hereditary claims and consequent abuses by which that 
See had been so long and so grievously distracted. Malachy, 
as already stated, had resolved to return at some time to his 
former diocess of Connor; wherefore in 1137 he resigned the 
See of Armagh and undertook the government of the diocess 
of Down, with which at that time the See of Connor had 
been united. The person whom, with the consent of the 
clergy and pec^le^ he appointed as his successor in Aimagh^ 
was Gelasiu5, Abbot of Deny and Archdeacon of that dio^ 
cess.t 

Cash^l had been raised by Celsus to the dignity of an 
archiepiscopal See, bat that act had not as yet been coa-> 
finned by the Sovereign Pontiff; neither had that See or the 
primatial one of Armagh been honoured with the pallium, by 
which in those times metropolitans were usually distinguished*, 
For this purpose Malachy undertook a journey to Rome and 
on his way visited the celebrated Monastery of Clairvaux, 
where he continued for some days. Here he became ac« 
quainted with St Bernard, and that friendship commenced 
which had never afler been dissolved. When Malachy anived 
at Rome, he presented himself to the Sovereign Pontiff, 
then Innocent IL, by whom he was received in the most 

* SL BeriMird, chap. VIII. t A. A. S. S. at 27th March, see chap. II. 



302 

gracious manner. His Holiness was pleased to confirm the 
act by which the See of Cashel had been raised to an arch- 
iepiscopal rank, but to that part of Malachy's request, which 
regarded the palliums for Armagh and Cashel, the Pope re« 
plied, '^This is a matter which must be transacted with great 
solemnity. Do you, first summoning the bishops and clergy 
and the chiefs of your country, celebrate a national council, 
and, after ye will all have agreed on this point, apply for the 
pallium, and it shall be given to you."* He then appointed 
Malachy legate apostolic for all Ireland, an office now 
vacant by the resignation of Gillebert, and then taking the 
mitre off his head the Pontiff placed it on that of Malachy. 
In like manner he invested him vnth the stole and maniple 
which he used when officiating, and saluting him in the kiss 
of peace dismissed him vrith his benediction. 

The many arduous duties, which had now devolved on 
Malachy in the capacity of Legate, allowed him little leisure 
or repose, until at length in 1148 and in the pontificate of 
Eugene III. a Synod was held at Holmpatrick, at which 
Malachy and Gelasius were present together with fifteen 
other bishops, two hundred priests and a great number of 
the inferior clergy.f In this Synod it was agreed to make 
the regular application for the palliums, and for this purpose 
Malachy undertook a second journey to Rome. Having 
arrived at Clairvaux, he was received with joy by St. Ber- 
nard; however, a few days after, on the festival of St. Luke, 
he was seized with a fever and expired in this Monastery on 
the 2nd of November, A.D. 1148 and in the 54th year of 
his age.j: 

The high veneration, in which St. Malachy had been held 
by the holy Abbot of Clairvaux, camiot be well described. — 
St. Bernard preached the funeral oration on the day of the 
interment and delivered a second panegyric on the anniver- 

* St. Bernard, chap. XI. t Annals of lunisfal. t St. Bernard, chap. XVI. 



303 

sary of his death. It is also highly probable that St. Ber* 
nard communicated the intelligence of St. Malachy's death 
and the nature of his mission to Pope Eugenius, especially as 
that Pontiff had been formerly a monk at Clairvaux and had 
been well acquainted with the Saint. At all eveutSi Cardinal 
Paparo^ accompanied by Christian, Bishop of Lismorci then 
l^ate apostolic, arrived in Ireland in the year 1151, bearing 
with him four palliums for the metropolitan sees of Armagh, 
Cashel, Dublin and Tuam. 

That a matter of such importance might be conducted 
with becoming solemnity, a national synod was convened at 
Kdls (in the County of Meath) on the 9th of March, A.D. 
1152. At this Synod, besides the Cardinal, who presided, 
and Christian, Bishop of Lismore, then legate apostolic, 
there were also present .Gelasius the Primate, Domnald 
O'Lonergan, Archbishop of Cashel, Gregory, Bishop of 
Dublin, together with the bishops of the following sees: 
Glendaloch, Leighlin, Waterford, Kildare, Cork, Clonfert, 
Kerry, Limerick, Clonmacnois, Roscommon, Achonry, Con* 
macne (Ardagh), Kinel-Eogain (Ardstrftth), Connor and 
Down, together with the Vicars General of Emly and Ossory : 
a great number of abbots and priors were also present and a 
vast multitude of inferior clergy.* When it was known that 
palliums had been intended for Dublin and Tuam, many of 
the clergy were much dissatisfied, and particularly those who 
belonged to the diocesses of Armagh and Down.-f This cir- 
cumstance has been considered by some as one of the rea- 
sons why the prelates of several sees had been absent. 

The council opened by the distribution of the palliums to 
the four following sees, in order: Armagh, Cashel, Dub- 
lin and Tuam ; on which occasion, the Archbishop of Ar- 
magh was declared Primate over the others. This is the 

* Accoiding to the Four Masters the namber amounted to 3000. 
t Keating, (quoted by Colgan, A. A. S. S. p. 654. 



304 

Synod in which an attempt was, for the first limey made 
of introdacing the notorious tithe system into Ireland.* — 
The decides, by which simony and usury had been con- 
demnedy passed unanimously^ but when the Cardinal set 
forth his favourite yet strange system of tithes, the propo- 
sition was instantly rejected; nor do we find that it had met 
with the approval of a single ecclesiastic in this national 
Synod. The Cardinal then proceeded to the arrangement of 
the suffragan sees in the following order: 1. Under Armagh 
were the Sees of Connor, Down, Louth or Clogher, Clonard, 
Kells, Ardagh, Raphoe, Rathlure (in the County of Tyrone), 
Duleek and Derry. 2. Under Cashel were placed, Killaloe, 
Limerick, Inniscatthy, Kilfenora, Emly, Roscrea, Waterford, 
Lismore, Cloyne, Coil:, Ross and Ardfert. 3. Under Dub- 
lb were named, Glenduloch, Ferns, Ossory, Leighiin and 
Kildare. 4. Under Tuam were placed Mayo, Killala, Ros- 
common, Clonfert, Achonry, Clonmacnois and Kilmac- 
duagh.f tt may be proper to remark, that in this list, the 
Sees of Elphin and of Dromore are not mentioned, for which 
reason it is generally supposed that the former was at this 
time united to Roscommon and the latter to Armagh.;}: The 
Sees of Louth and of Clogher had been united for many 
years prior to this Synod, however, in later times the town of 
Louth and other parts of that ancient diocess were annexed 
to Armagh.§ The decrees of the Synod of Kelis were con- 
fined exclusively to discipline and morals; nothing relative 
to fiiith had been discussed, the doctrine of the Irish Church 
being at that time, as it is at this day, the very same wiiieh 
the Apostle of the nation had introduced, and which had 
been consecrated by all that was great or gvand in antiquity 
— ^by the learning, the wisdom and the sanctity of ages. 



• Keating, Aimalfi of Clooenagh. f Ware Antiq. c. XVI, 

t Ware Bishops. § See Cent. XIII. 



306 

The proceeditijgs of the Synod having been terminated^ 
Cardinal Paparo remained but a short time in Ireland^ having 
on the 24th of the same month set out on his journey to Rome. 

This was the memorable period in which Henry II was 
placed on the throne of England, and about the same time 
(1164) Adrian IV succeeded Eugene III in the chair of St. 
Peter. Henry had for years secretly contemplated the con- 
quest of Ireland, and that a similar design had engaged the 
attention of eome of his predecessors, ever since the subjection 
of die See of Dublin to that of Canterbury, is an opinion 
amountii^ to more than a mere probability. Henry, who 
had artfttHy studied the natural disposition and religious tem- 
perament of the Irish, saw distinctly the profound reverence 
with which that people were always ready to entertain every 
injunction emanating from the holy See: accordingly he re- 
solved to procure by all means the solemn sanction of the 
Pontiff, before he should venture on so daring and hazardous 
an enterprize. An opportunity soon presented itself, and 
Henry availed himself of it. Adrian IV (Nicholas Brecspere) 
was an Englishman, and to htm did Henry make application 
through the agency of John of Salisbury, then chaplain to 
Theobald, Archbishop of Canterbury. John's request, like 
the reasons on which it had been grounded, was no doubt a 
precious compound of Christian zeal and disinterestedness. 
He prayed that his master might be merely permitted to take 
possession of Ireland, for the purpose ''of extending the 
boundaries of the Church, of announcing to an unlearned and 
rude people the truths of the Christian faith, and of extirpat- 
ing the weeds of vice from the field of the Lord."* 

Adrian, anxious for the aggrandizement of his country, or 
as Cardinal Pole expresses it, induced by the love of his 
country ff lost no time in complying with the agent's request. 

* Sec Bull of Adrian. 

t In his tpeech delivered A. D, 1554, aad quoted by Ubiier, (Syll. Note to 
Adiian's Bull.) 

2q 



306 

He accordingly furnished Henry with the celebrated document 
or Bull, by which be makes over all Ireland to that Monarch, 
requiring only, that the rights of the Church may be preserved 
inviolate and that a denarius should be paid annually from 
. every house to St. Peter.* That this document is unquestion- 
ably authentic cannot be doubted, notwithstanding the opin- 
ion of some writers to the contrary. It is published in the 
Annals of Baronius, and copied, as that learned author de- 
clares, from the Codex Vatican^. John XXII has annexed 
it to his celebrated Brief addressed to Edward II, in the 



* The fdlowing is a traoslfttion of the Bull of Adrian IV.—" Adrian, Biahop, 
Servant of the servants of God, to his most dear son m Christ, the nohle Kiog of 
England, sendcth greeting and apostolic henediction. Your magnificence hath 
been very carefnl and stn^ons how jroa might enlarge the Church of God here on 
earth and increase the number of samts and elect in heaven, in that as a good catho- 
lic King you have and do by all means labour and travail to enlarge and increase 
God's Church, by teaching the ignorant people the true and Christian religion, and 
in abolishing and rooting up the weeds of sin and wickedness. And whereas yo« 
have, and do crave, for your better furtherance, the help of the Apostolic See 
(wherein yon more speedily and discreetly proceed) the better success, we hope, 
God will send ; for all they, which of a fervent xeal and love in religion, do begin 
and enterprise any such thing, shall no doubt in the end have a good and pnqier- 
ous sncoesss. And as for Ireland, and all other islands, where Christ is known and 
the Christian religion received, it is out of all doubt, and your Excellency w^l 
knoweth, they do all appertain and belong to the right of St. Peter, and of the 
Church of Rome \ and we are so much the more ready, dewrous and willing, to sow 
the acceptable seed of God's word, because we know the same in the latter day will 
be most severely required at your hands. You have (our well beloved son in CHtrist) 
advertixed and signified unto us, that you will enter into the land and realm of Ire- 
land, to the end, to bring them to obedience unto law, and under your subjection, 
and to root out^ from among them, their foul sins and wickedness; as also to yield 
and pay yearly out of every house, a yearly pension of one penny to St. Peter, and 
besides alio will defend and keep the rites of those churehes whole and inviokte. 
We therefore, well allowing and favouring this your goodly disposition and com- 
mendable affection, do accept, ratify, and assent, unto this your petition, and do 
grant that you (for the dilating of God's Church, the punishment of sin, the reform- 
ing of manners, the planting of virtue, and the increasing of Christian religion) do 
enter and possess that land, and there to execute according to your wisdom, what- 
soever shall be for the honour of God, and the safety of the realm. And further 
also, we do strictly charge and require, that all the people of that land do, with all 
humbleness, dutifulness, and honour, receive and accept you as their liege Lord and 
Sovereign, reserving and excepting the right of holy church to be inviolably pre- 
served, as also the yearly pensien of Peter-pence out of every house, which we re* 



307 

fourteenth century:* in short, John of Salisbury, m his work 
entitled ^'Metalogicus/' actually acknowledges that it was by 
his means the King of England had obtained this Bull from 
Adrian IV.f 

Henry, although having this document in his possession^ 
was soon sensible that some other pretext must be assigned 
for the invasion of Ireland^ besides the pretended reasons al- 
luded to in the Bull. Nor was it long until the opportunity, 
so ardently wished for, had been afforded him by means of the 
perfidious and profligate Dermod MaC'^Morogh, King of Lein*^ 
8ter4 This detestable tyrant) haying been abandoned by his 
▼assals and deposed by Roderic 0*Conor, King of Ireland, 
had recourse to Henry II, who was then in Aquitaine, and 
casting himself at the feet of that Sorereign swore allegiance 
and offered him the supreme dominion of his kingdom, in case 
he should be reinstated. The English Monarch, baring been 
at that time involved in great difficulties himself, could not 
assist him with any considerable force; he, however, caused 

quiie to be tnily answered to St. Pater and to the Church of Bomer If, therefore, 
you do mind to bring your godly purpose to effect, endeayour to tra? ail to reform the 
people to some better order and trade of life, and that also by yourself and by such 
others as yon shall think meet, true and honest in their lifo, mann^, and conver- 
sation, to the end the Church of God may be beautified, the true Christian religion 
sowed and planted, and all other things done, that by any means shall or may be to 
God's honour and salvation of men's souls, whereby you may in the end receive of 
God's hands the reward of everlasting Ufe, and also m the mean time, and in this 
life carry a glorious feme and an honourable report among all nations." — Cod. Vat. 
apud Baroni.— Matth. Paris ad. an. 1155.— Fleury, L. 70. This Bull of Adrian 
was afterwards confirmed by his successor, Alexander HI, for which confirmatory 
Brief, see page 313. 

•See Cent. XIV. cl. 

t *' Ad preces meas illustri Hegi Anglorum Henrico II, concessit (Adrianus) et 
dedit Hibemiam jure hereditario possidendam, $ieut liters ipHus tutantur in hodi- 
emum dUnu Nam omnes insuls de jure antique, ex donatione Constantini, qui 
earn fundavit et dotavit, dicuntur ad Romanam Ecclesiam pertinere." Metalog. L. 4. 

% Giraldus Cambrensis treating of Dermod Mac-Morogh draws the following 
character. — " Nobilium oppressor, hnmilium erector, infestus suis, exosus alienis ; 
Manus omiuum contra ipsum et ipse contrarius omiiL'' — Ilib. expug. L. !• c. 6. 



308 

letters patent to be issued, in which he recommends the case 
of Dermod to his sabjects and encourages such as might be 
inclined to volunteer their services. Dermod proceeded on Ua 
journey until he came to Bristol. Here he met and conversed 
with Richard^ sumamed Strongbow, Earl of Chepstow or 
Striguly who engaged to go over into Ireland the ensnmg 
springy upon condition that Dermod should give him in mar- 
riage his only daughter Eva and settle upon him the succes- 
sion of his whole inheritance in that kingdom. Passing 
through Wales, he there negotiated with Robert Fitz-Stephen 
and Maurice Fitz-Gerald, both Normans and maternal brothers, 
and having promised to reward them amply they readily en- 
gaged to espouse his cause. 

It was the month of May 1169, when the Anglo-Normann, 
for the first time, arrived on the Irish coast.* They landed 
near Bannow, in the County of Wexford; their whole force 
consisting of only 360 men, under the command of Fitst* 
Stephen, Miler Fitz-Henry, Hervey de Monte-Morisco 
(Mount-Morres) and several knights. On the next day, 
having been joined by Maurice de Prendei^ast and by Der- 
mod himself at the head of 500 of his best Leinster troops, 
they fell upon Wexford, where they met with a desperate re- 
sistance from the Danish inhabitants. The town was soon 
after obliged to surrender and was made over by Dermod to 
Fitz-Stephen and Fitz-Oerald, according to agreement. The 
arrival of Strongbow did not take place until the 23rd of 
August 1170, in which year he landed near Waterford 
vrith a detachment of 1000 men and 200 knights.t Strongs . 
bow, without waiting to be reinforced by the other Norman 
troops or by Dermod, made an attack on Waterford: the 
city having been taken by storm, a dreadful slaughter of the 
inhabitants ensued. They next proceeded to Dublin which 
city fell into their hands, and thence marched into Meath 

• O'Flaherty'B Ogygi«, Part iii. t Id.— Waw. 



30& 

and Breffny^ ravaging these territories with aasparing bar- 
barity. The atrocities committed by these Normans, not 
coming within the scope of this history^ shall be here passed 
over. Daring the frightful carnage which had taken place 
in Dnblin after the storming of that city, the exertions of , 
St. Laurence 0*Toole, who was then Archbishop of the See, 
were unceasing and truly perilous.* At the risk of his life 
he attended and comforted the dying and the afflicted, and 
with difficulty obtamed that the books, vestments and sacred 
chalices, which the Normans had pillaged from the churches, 
should be restored. 

This invasion, accompanied as it had been by nnheard-of 
sacrilege and massacre, was considered by the prelates of 
Ireland as a judgment from heaven, in consequence of the 
base traffic which had been at that time carried on between 
some Irish merchants and the unnatural English. The state* 
ment of this notorious fact shall, for obvious reasons, be 
taken verbatim from the writings of OiraMus Cambrensis: 
^' About this time a general S3rnod of the Irish clergy was 
held at Armagh, in which, after much deliberation concern* 
ing the arrival of the foreigners in Ireland, it was unaai-^ 
mously declared, that thu misfortune was a judgment of 
Ood on account of the sins of the people, and particularly 
because they used to buy English persons from merchants^ 
robbers and pirates, and reduce them to slavery, and that 
it would «appear, that they, in their turn, were to be enslaved 
by that nation. For the English people, while their king^ 
dom was still firm, had, through a common vice of the natioUj 
been accustomed to expose their children for sale, and even 
before they were in any want or distress scrupled not to sell 
their own sons and relatives to the Irish. It might hence be 
probably supposed, that for this enormous crime the pur-- 
chasers deserved the yoke of slavery, in the same manner as 

t Sise chap. III. 



310 

the seUen had been treated already. It was^ therefore, de* 
creed and unanimously ordered by the Synod, that all the 
English throughout Ireland, who might happen to be in a 
Btate of slavery, should be restored to their original liberty."* 

Henry 11. who had now become jealous of the progress of 
Strongbow, resolved to lose no time in proceeding to Ireland. 
He accordingly landed at Waterford, on the 18th of October, 
A.D. 1171, with an army consisting of 500 knights and 
about 4000 armed followers.t Here he was waited upon by 
Dermod Mac-Carthy, King of Desmond, who submitted to 
him and put hostages into his hands. From Waterford 
Henry marched to Lismore and afterwards to Cashel, in 
which latter city Donald O'Brian, King of Thomond, swore 
fealty and acknowledged himself his vassaL The example of 
these princes was followed by OTelan of the Desies, Mac- 
Gilla-Patrick of Ossory and others. Henry next proceeded 
to Dublm, where O'Carrol, Prince of Ergal, and O'Ruarc 
of Breffhy made submission; while Roderic O'Conor still 
continued in his kingdom of Connaught, and the princes of 
the northern districts of Ulster refused to acknowledge the 
sovereignty of a foreigner. 

Henry having been now soverdgn of Leath-Mogha (the 
southern half of Ireland) thought it high time to commence 
his long boasted reformation of the Irish Church, according 
to the terms expressed in the Bull of Adrian IV. For this 
purpose, he directed that a Synod should be convened at 
Cashel early in the ensuing year, 1172, and that notice in 
due form should be given to each of the archbishops and 
bishops of the kingdom. At this Synod, neither the Primate 
Grelasius or any of the Ulster bishops attended. 

Christian, Bishop of Lismore, then legate apostolic pre- 
sided; there were present O'HuUican, Archbishop of Cashel, 
Laurence OToole of Dublin, and Catholicus of Tuam to- 
gether with their sufFvagan bishops and some abbots. — 

• Giraldtts, Hibcr-expug. L. 1. chap. XV III, t Ware.— O'Fhherty, Ogy. 



311 

Henry, on his part, sent to this Synod Ralph, Archdeacon 
of Landaff, Nicholas his chaplain and other ecclesiastics. — 
In this convocation, the mighty engagements entered into by 
Henry were to have been fulfilled and the Church of Ireland 
was to be reformed; how effectually all these objects had 
been achieved, the following decrees passed in the Synod of 
Cashel will best enable us to determine. 

It was decreed: '^1. That the fisuthful throughout Ireland 
do contract and observe lawful marriages, rejecting those 
with their relations either by consanguinity or affinity.* — 

2. That infants be catechized before the door of the church, 
and baptized in the holy font in the baptismal churches. — 

3. That all the faithful do pay the tithes of animals, com, 
and other produce to the church, of which they are parish- 
ioners. 4. That all ecclesiastical lands and property con- 
nected with them be quite exempt from the exactions of all 
laymen. And, especially, that neither the petty kings or 
counts, or any powerful men in Ireland, or their sons with 
their families do exact, as was usual, victuals and hospitality 
or entertainments in the ecclesiastical districts, or presume to 
extort them by force; and that the detestable food or con- 
tributions, which used to be required four times in the year 
from the fiurms belonging to churches by the neighbouring 
counts, shall not be claimed any more. 6. That, in case of 
a murder committed by laymen and of their compounding 
for it with theif enemies, clergymen their relations are not to 
pay part of the fine, (or Erick) but that, as they were not con- 
cerned in the perpetration of the murder, they are to be 
exempted from the payment of money. 6. That all the 

* By thb decree it was intended to establish in Ireland that portion of the eccle* 
siasdcal law, by which, in those times, marriage was prohibited within the seventh 
degree of consangiiinity and affinity. This law could not be coDYcniently enforced 
in Ireland, in conseqnence of the system of clanship which then prevailed in this 
country. It was found to be equally inconvenient in many other parts of the 
Western Church and was, on that account, soon after modified and reduced, as it 
now is, to the fourth degreCf 



312 

faiUiful, lying in sickness^ do, in the presence of their con- 
fessor and neighbours, make their will with due solemnity, 
diyiding, in case they have wives and children (exceptii^ 
their debts and servants wages), their moveable goods into 
three parts, and bequeathing one for the children, another 
for the lawful wife, and the third for the funeral obsequies. — 
7. That due respect be paid to those who die after a good 
confession, by means of masses, vigils and decent burial* — 
Likewise, that all divine matters be henceforth conducted 
agreeably to the practices of the holy Church, according as 
observed by the Anglican Church/'* 

Such were the regulations of the Synod of Cashel — such 
the mighty reform brought about by Henry IL, and to effect 
which, public plunder, rapine and sacrilege had been per- 
petrated, while the fitce of the country was deluged with the 
blood of the people. These decrees were, however, totally 
disregarded by the Irish clei^ and their flocks; the t^idency 
of some of them were too perceptible, and having been 
furnished already with ample and salutary laws of discipline 
confirmed at Kells and in previous councils, to these they 
conscientiously adhered. Henry was soon after obliged to 
return to England, having brought himself into serious 
difficulties by being implicated in the murder of St Thomas 
a Becket. 

During all this time neither the Bull of Adrian IV. nor the 
confirmatory Brief of his successor Alexander HL had been 
publicly produced. The English Monait^h had too much 
policy not to perceive that the shameless and unfounded as* 
persions contained in these documents would but produce 
one general burst of indignation from both clergy and peo- 
ple; nor did he venture to publish them until three years 
afterwards (1175) when the precarious state of his affairs in 
Ireland loudly called for some hitherta untried and desperate 

• Ciraldus, Hib. expug, chap. XXX IV. 



313 

eflTort la that year Henry II. sent Nicholas, Prior of Wal- 
lingford and William Fitz-Adelm to Ireland with both the 
Bull and confirmatory Brief.* They landed at Waterford 
andy having summoned a meeting of the bishops, here these 
curious documents were for the first time read in Ireland.t — 
They had no effect whatever in healing the wounded feelings 
of the people, the unsparing rapacity of the invaders having 
been such as to place the wretched condition of the natives 
beyond the power of all human endurance. At length a 
negociation took place at Windsor, betweai the English 
Monarch and Roderic O'Connor, in which it was stipulated 
that Roderic, as King of Ireland, should continue in full 
possession of his ancient hereditary dominions on condition of 
his paying to Henry a certain tribute. Roderic's ambassadors 
on this occasion were Catholicus, Archbishop of Tuam, Con- 
cors. Abbot of Clonfert and Laurence his chancellor, together 
with St. Laurence O'Toole who happened to be at that time 
engaged on some ecclesiastical business in Bngland* 

It was now generally hoped that the Bull of Adrian as 
well as the Brief of Alexander would be patiently allowed to 
rest in oblivion, or at least that these documents would Hot 
be officially enforced; however^ in 1177, Cardinal Vivian, 
who had been sent to Ireland as legate apostolic, arrived in 

* The following is Uie cuofirmatory Brief of Alexander III : " Alexander^ 
Bbhop, Servant of the Servants of God, to his dearly beloved son, the noble King 
of England, greeting, grace and apostolic benediction* For as auch as things given 
and granted upon good reason by our predecessors are to be well allowed of,, ratified 
and confirmed ; We, well considering and pondering the grant and privilege for, and 
concerning the dominion of the land of Ireland to us appertaining, and lately given 
by Adrian our predecessor, and following his steps, do, in like manner, confirn^, 
ratify and allow the same ; reserving and saving to St Pete^i and to the Church of 
Rome, the yearly pension of one penny out of every house, as well in England as in 
Ireland. Provided also, that the barbarous people of Ireland, by your means, be 
reformed, and recovered from their filthy life and abominable conversation ; that as 
in name, so in life and manners, they may be Christians, and that, as that lude and 
disordered Church, by bemg by you reformed, the whole nation may also with the 
possession of the name, be in acts and deeds followers of the same." 

t Giraldus, L. 2. chap. vi. 

2r 



314 

Dublin and immediately convened a Synod of bisbops and 
abbots. In this Synod, the Cardinal maintained Henry's 
right to the sovereignty of Ireland, in virtue of the Pope's au- 
thority and even insisted on the necessity of Unqualified obe- 
dience from all persons under pain of excommunication. He 
likewise allowed the invaders liberty to enter tlie churches 
and take from thence whatever provisions the people had, for 
sake of safety, deposited therein, on condition that a reason- 
able price should be paid for them to the pastors of these 
churches.* The Cardinal had, it seems, been under some 
serious obligations to De Courcey and other adventurers, and 
most likely coqsidered all this as a sort of instalment for the 
large debt of gratitude which it is certain he had owed to 
them. What kind of impression this singular conduct of the 
legate had made on the minds of the clei^gy assembled his- 
tory has not thought proper to hand down to us; however, 
it is certain that the people of Ireland, plundered and out- 
raged as they had been, were but little inclined to pay any 
attention to this indiscreet exhibition of clerical diplomacy 
-and extravagance. 

These proceedings together with the publication of the 
documents themselves had now created such a ferment in the 
public mind, that the measures, contemplated in the late 
Synod of Dublin, were censured and condemned by all. It 
was well known that Henry's agents had been actively em- 
ployed at Rome, and it was equally certain that an imposi* 
tion alike gross and mischievous had been practised on the 
Pontiff. While some, therefore, inveighed bitterly against 
the Cardinal, many were aggrieved at the calumnies which 
had been cast on the nation, and all felt indignant at the 
baseness and treachery of the minions by whom those mis- 
representations had been so artfully and widely circulated. 

Such had been the distracted state of the nation, when in 

• Girirfdus, Hib. expug. L. 2. chap. XVII.—Ware, Annals at A. 1177. 



315 

1179, summonses were issued by Alexander III., for the 
meeting of the third general Council of Laterau. On this 
occasion the following Irish Bishops set out for Rome: Lau- 
rence O'Toole of Dublin, Catholicus of Tuam, Constantino 
O'Brian of Killaloe, Felix of Lismore, Augustin of Water- 
ford and Brictius of Limerick. These Prelates were received 
in Rome with marked attention, and particularly Laurence 
OToole, whose jurisdiction over the suffragan sees of Glen- 
dalocb, Kildare, Ferns, Leighlin and Ossory was at this time 
confirmed by Alexander III.* This Pontiff, having now an 
opportunity of conversing with some of the heads of the 
Irish Church, was at length convinced that, in the con- 
firmatory Brief which he had drawn up for Heniy, he had 
been grossly imposed upon, and that the terms employed in 
that official document were as severe as they had been un- 
called for; as a mark, therefore, of his feelings on the sub- 
ject, he not only put into the hands of Laurence a Brief con- 
firmatory of the above mentioned rights, but moreover ap- 
pointed him his legate apostolic throughout Ireland. In the 
discharge of the duties belonging to this apostolic legation, 
Laurence had to encounter much anxiety and many diffi- 
culties. The English ecclesiastics whom Henry II had sent 
over, as well to reform ''the rude and disordered Church of 
Ireland, as to convert its barbarous ' people from their filthy 
life and abominable conversation,"t were, it appears, with 
few exceptions, a set of the most incontinent profligates. — 
That characters of this description should have anything to 
do with the Church of his native country was a heart-rend- 
ing reflection to the pure mind of Laurence. Anxious, there- 
fore, to remove this crying scandal with which Irishmen had 
been hitherto unacquainted and to afford his Holiness himself 
an opportunity of witnessing the hopeful manner in which 

• Vita S. Laurent, chap. XXIII. t Bull and Brief. 



31C 

the Church of Ireland was to be reformed by Englishmen, 
Laurence sent one hundred and forty of them, who were con- 
victed of incontinency, to Rome for absolution, although be 
had, at the time, the power of absolving them himself.* 

The See of Dublin had been, at this period, richly en- 
dowed; the revenues of which Laurence applied to the use of 
the poor and afflicted, while he himself led a life of rigorous 
austerity. To the Archiepiscopal See of Dublin, in 1180, 
belonged Swords, Lusk, Finglass, Clondalkin^ Ireland's Eye, 
Tallagh and many other places; also the parish Churches of 
St. Thomas, St. Nicholas, St. Werburg and St. Patrick in the 
south suburbs of the city. These ample revenues the Saint 
employed in works of unbounded charity, and during the 
great famine, by which the nation had been then visited for 
three years, he is said to have afforded daily relief to no less 
than five hundred persons, besides the crowds of applicants 
who were constantly pouring in from the country. St. Lau- 
rence continued to discharge the duties of his pastoral office 
and of his legation until his death, which took place in 
France, on the 14th of November, A.D, 1180.+ 

On the death of St Laurence OToole, Henry II des- 
patched Jeffery De la Hay, his chaplain, and a clerk of the 
Legate Alexius to Dublin, with orders that the revenues of the 
See should be immediately seized on and collected by them 
into the Exchequer.;]: Henry had, at this time, an intention 
of transferring the dominion of Ireland to his son John. In 
order, therefore, to prepare the way for his reception, that 
Monarch took care that none but an English ecclesiastic 
should be appointed to preside over a See of such rank and 
importance. The person whom he recommended was John 
Cumin, an Englishman; who besides being learned and 
eloquent, had also filled an ecclesiastical situation in the 

* ViU S. Laurent, cbap. XXIII. t See chap. III. t Ware Annals, 1180. 



317 

royal palace for sevei^tl yeai's. He was accordingly elected 
at Evesham, in Worcestershire, on the 6th of September, 
A.D. 1181, by some of the clergy of DabUn, whom the King 
had assembled there for th»t purpose, and the year after was 
consecrated at Velletri by Pope Lucius III.* That same 
year, John Cumin obtained a Bull from Lucius III, which 
conferred some important priyileges on the Archdiocess of 
Dublin, and which in aftertimes had occasioned much con- 
troversy between the archbishops of that See and the pri- 
mates of Armagh.f Four years had now elapsed between 
the death of St Laurence OToole and the arrival of his suc- 
cessor John Cumin in Dublin; during which time the King's 
exchequer, as it is natural to suppose, must have derived no 
inconsiderable share of benefit On the following year 
(1185) John, Earl of Morton, son of Henry, arrived at 
Waterford, accompanied by the famous Grerald Barry (Gir- 
aldus Cambrensis) as his tutor and secretary .j: The new 
Archbishop, John Cumin, as being the first Englishman who 
had ever been placed over an Irish See, considered it now 
high time to open his administration by some memorable act 
of his pastoral care and solicitude. This he did by causing 
a provincial Synod to be held ftbout the middle of the follow- 
ing Lent in the Cathedral of the Holy Trinity (Christ Church), 
Dublm. The decrees passed at this Synod were of a ritual, 
and disciplinary character; most of them had been already 
sanctioned either by long prescribed usage, or by positive 
acts juridically ratified in many of the previous synodical 
meetmgs of the prelates of Ireland. The 13th Canon is a 
publicly recorded and well merited encomium on the high 
character of the Irish priesthood: while the 19th, which re- 
garded the payment of tithes, had, notwithstanding the de« 
cree of the Council of Cashel, continued almost a dead let- 
ter; nor were these tithes paid in Ireland except within the 

• Ware Bishops. t See chap, II, Dublin. j Ware, Annal. Writers, 



318 

pale, or that mere fractional portion in which the English 
influence bad predominated.*' 

The exemplary chastisement, which St. Laurence O'Toole 
had been obliged to inflict on numbers of the English clergy 
for their incontinengy and scandalous lives, was not after all, 
it appears, sufficient to prevent the evil. They still continued 
to pour into Ireland; while one party seemed to outstrip the 
other in unrestrained licentiousness and open debauchery. — 
Such unheard of profligacy could not but call forth the just 
reprobation of the Synod. Its proceedings having been gene- 
rally opened by a sermon, on the first day the Archbishop 
himself preached on the sacraments. On the second day 
Alban O'MulIoy, Abbot of Baltinglass and afterwards Bishop 
of Ferns, delivered an impressive and powerful lecture on the 
subject of clerical continency. In this discourse, the learned 
O'MuUoy took occasion to dwell on the unsullied character 
of the Irish clergy, and then, in mixed terms of grief and 
indignation he inveighed most bitterly against the English 
and Welsh clergy who had come into Ireland; upbraiding 
them with having polluted the altars of his country by their 
filthy and abominable crimes; while in tears of anguish he 
assured them, that such crying scandal had never been heard 
of in the sanctuary of the Irish Church, until aliens and ad- 
venturers had been authorized to come in amongst them. — 
This discourse was not without the desired effect. The 
learned O'MuUoy had scarcely returned from the pulpit when 
these English ecclesiastics began, by mutual recrimination, 
to accuse each other, one endeavouring to shew that the 
other was more criminal than himself: and thus did they pub- 
licly expose themselves to the contemptuous disgust and in-> 



* The 19th Canon provides, " That tithes be paid to the mother churches, out of 
provisions, hay, the young dF animals, flax, wool, gardens, orchards, and out of all 
things that grow and renew yearly, under pain of an anathema, after the third moni- 
tion; and that those, who remain obstinate in refusing, shall be obliged to pay the 
more punctually for the future." 



319 

dignant scorn of the Irish clergy. Numbei*s of them were, 
on this occasion convicted, and accordingly the Archbishop 
suspended them from their ecclesiastical functions and the 
enjoyment of their benefices.* On the third day, Gerald 
Barry, by order of the Archbishop, preached a sermon, or 
rather poured forth a torrent of abuse on the Irish clergy and, 
in fact, on the whole nation. In this unmeaning tirade, Gir- 
aldus made a public display not only of his malevolence, 
but even of his utter ignorance of ecclesiastical antiquities 
and of the customs and manners of the Irish people. Among 
other matters he accused them of being too fond of indulging 
themselves over their cups.f With all his prejudices, how- 
ever, he was obliged at the stern command of truth to draw 
the following admirable character of the Irish clergy: "The 
clergy (he says) of this country are very commendable for 
religion, and among the divers virtues which distinguish them, 
they excel and are pre-eminent in the prerogative of chastity. 
Likewise, they attend regularly and vigilantly to their psalms 
and hours, to reading and prayer; and remaining within the 
precincts of the churches do not absent themselves from the 
divine offices, to the celebration of which they have been ap- 
pointed. They also pay great attention to abstinence and 
sparingness of food, so that the greatest part of them fast 
almost every day until dusk and until they have completed 
all the canonical offices.''^ 

The proceedings of this Synod served, in no small degree, 
to check the haughty domineering spirit of Giraldus. The 

* Fleury, L. 74. — Giraldus de rebus a se gestis. 

t The prevailing Celtic custom of enjoyiog some beverage after the principal meal 
was observed among the ancient Irish, as in fact it is among then: descendants to this 
day. To a person unacquainted with such a national usage, as Giraldus Cambren- 
sia actually had been, it might i^pear somewhat singular i he does not, however, 
accuse them of inebriety, as is evident from the term potoies, which he thought 
proper to employ on the occasion. 

t Girald. Top. Hib. D, 3. 



320 

disgraceful conduct of his countrymen and the public expose^ 
which had just been made, worked so strongly on his feel* 
ings, that he refused the vacant See of Ferns which had 
been then offecpd to him by his patron Prince John, and soon 
after returned to his own country* It appears that several 
of the English ecclesiastics had, by this time, found means 
of obtaining a settlement in that diocess; for which reason it 
was the anxious wish of the native clergy and indeed of 
Archbishop Cumin, that no person but an Irishman of zeal 
and firmness should be appointed to preside over it All eyes 
were now fixed on Albin O'Mulloy, and having been accord- 
ingly consecrated,* this determined and religious Prelate 
soon began, by purging his diocess, to teach these new- 
fashioned English reformers the practical and proper meaning 
of Irish discipline and of Irish morality. 

Albin was not, however, equally successful in his legal 
proceedings against William, Earl of Pembroke and Earl 
Marshal of England* This noble adventurer had, by his 
marriage with Isabel, only daugher of Strongbow, acquired 
large possessions in Leinster, and these estates became conr 
siderably augmented after his appointment as Lord Deputy 
in the place of William Petit in 119L In those times eccle- 
siastical revenue, like every other species of property, was 
insecure, while the most ancient, prescriptive rights had been 
oftentimes compelled to give way beneath the pressure of 
arbitrary control or military despotism. It appears, that 
certain manors, which had, from time immemorial, belonged 



* It may be proper to remark, that Albin 0*Mulloy and also his predeceasor 
Joseph O'Hethe have been flometimes styled Bishops of Wexford. In the charter 
of the Abbey of Dunbrody, to which Joseph had been a witness, be subscribes him- 
eelf Bishop of Wexford; and it is certain that in the Ball which John Cumin had 
obtained from Lucius III, in 1182, this See is called " Episcopatos Wexfordiensis." 
It is probable that they might have had some intention of translating the See thither 
in consequence of the rising importance of the town of Wexford at this time ; how. 
ever, after the death of Albin O'Mulloy, the prelates of this Diocess were invari! 
ably styled Bishops of Ferns, 



321 

to the See of Ferns and which were usually set apart for the 
use of the poor, had been seized upon by this opulent noble* 
man and placed on the roll of his already gorgeous estates. — 
Against this encroachment on the rights of the poor the 
Bishop of Ferns remonstrated;* and although he had ven* 
tared to commence a suit on this proceeding of the deputy, 
yet the result was a failure; for no tribunal could be found 
either able or willing to determine such a case by any fair or 
impartial decision. The Earl, however, seems to have soon 
after regretted the course which had been pursued, and en- 
deavoured to make ample repamtion by becoming the patron 
of various religious and charitable foundations. Albin 
O'MoUoy continued in the administration of the Diocess of 
Ferns until 1222, in which year he died, after an incumbency 
of thirty-six years. 

In those former angry times, when the fury of the Dane 
was not to be appeased even by the profanation of the sanc- 
tuary, the sacred remains of St. Patrick, St. Brigid and St. 
Columbkill had been removed from their shrines by some of 
the fiiithful and deposited in a retired part of the Cathedral of 
Down. The place in which they had been concealed was 
known but to few, so that after the lapse of many years the 
hallowed spot could not be exactly ascertained. Malachy 
was Bishop of Down in 1186, having been the third in suc- 
cession after the great St. Malachy. This pious Prelate had 
been for a long time solicitous to discover the place in which 
the sacred treasure lay, and to this effect he ceased not to 
pour forth his humble and most fervent supplications to the 
Almighty. While in the exercise of one of these acts of de- 
votion, his attention was directed in a supernatural manner, 
as tradition will have it, to a particular quarter of the 
Cathedral, and he lost no time in having it carefully ex- 
amined. When the persons employed in removing the earth 

• Math€w, Paris, Hist. Maj.^Wtre*s Bishops. 

« 2 s 



322 

had proceeded to a certain depth, they found the relics, 
which they immediately took up and reverently placed in 
three separate coffins.* John de Couicyi then Liord of Down, 
having been made acquainted with the fact and its circum- 
stances, it was agreed that a formal application should be 
referred to Pope Urban III, for the solemn translation of 
those sacred remains. Delegates were accordingly despatched 
to Rome, and their memorial having been received and sanc- 
tioned by the Pontiff, Vivian, Cardinal Priest of St Stephen 
de Monte Coelio, was sent over to Ireland with powers to 
preside as legate apostolic on this august occasion. The 
ceremony of the translation took place immediately after the 
arrival of the legate; and on the 9th of June, the festival of 
St. Columba, the hallowed remains of St. Patrick, St. Brigid 
and St. Columbkill were removed from the place in which 
they had been so long concealed and deposited with great 
solemnity in the same monument,t at the right side of the 
high altar. This interesting ceremony was attended by 
fifteen bishops, besides a great number of abbots, priors, 
deans and deacons and a vast concourse of people. On this 
occasion, likewise, it was decreed that, henceforth, the an- 
niversary of this translation should be celebrated as a solemn 
festival throughout Ireland. 

At the close of the twelfth century (in 1192) Matthew 
O'Heney, Archbishop of Cashel and successor of Maurice,^: 
was appointed legate apostolic for Ireland by Pope Celestine 
III. 

The following eulogy of the illustrious O'Heney is recorded 

* O0ice of the Translation, printed in Paris, A. D. 1620.— Messingham, Foril^. 

t Hence the following distich, forming the response to the 8th lesson of the office : 

" Nunc tres in Duno tumulo tumulantur in uno, 

Brigida, Patricias, atque Columba pius/' 

X Giraldns Cambrensis in a conversation which he had with this Prelate endea- 

TOured to lessen the character of the Irish clergy by observing that none of them 

had gained the crown of martyrdom ; to which the Archbishop replied : " It is true 

that, although our nation may seem uncultivated and rude, yet they were always 



323 

in the Annals of St. Mary's Abbey, Dublin, A.D. 1206: 
'' Matthew, Archbishop of Cashel, L^te of all Ireland, the 
wisest and most religious man of the natives of that country, 
having founded many churches, and triumphed over the 
enemy of mankind by working many miracles, volimtarily 
abandoned all worldly pomp and happily went to rest in the 
Abbey of Holy Cross." 

The civil history of Ireland, at the close of the twelfth 
century, is truly awful, but does not, of course, come within 
the scope of this analysis. From the unsettled state of the 
nation neither discipline or morality had in this age been in 
any manner ameliorated, notwithstanding the number of its 
synods and the exertions of its eminent men. During the 
last thirty years, the Church of Ireland had, moreover, sus- 
tained many and serious injuries, particularly in Leinster. — 
These, however, had been partly repaired by the labours of 
Archbishop Cumin and of his suffragan bishops, while at the 
same time many cathedral churches and several monastic in- 
stitutions were founded, which for piety and learning had, 
in subsequent times, become deservedly celebrated. 



wont to pay great reverence to ecclesiaatical men, and not to stretch their hands on 
any occasion against the saints of God. But a people are now come into this king- 
dom, who know how and are accustomed to make martyra. Henceforth Ireland 
shall, like other countries, have martyrs." — ^I'ypographia Dis. 3. chap» xxxii. 



CHAPTER IL 

Successors of SL Patrick — Episcopal Sees — ReligiauM 
Foundations of the Twelfth Century. 

Celsub (Ceallach)y as has been already stated, continued 
to govern the Archiepiscopal See of Armagh until bis death in 
the year 1129. Notwithstanding the many efforts which liad 
been made by Celsus, the work of usurpation was now resumed, 
while Mauritius, son of the pseudo-archbishop Domnald, 
was elected by the monopolizing family and thrust into the 
See. After this usurper had enjoyed the temporalities to- 
gether with the primatial title for about three years, St^ 
Malachy was prevailed upon by the legate Gillebert and 
other prelates to remove from the See of Connor to that of 
Armagh, So formidable, however, had the power of this 
faction become that the Saint could not attempt to enter the 
city until after the death of the usurper, which took place in 
1134. 

Malachy was now conducted into the city of Armagh by 
the clergy together with many of the neighbouring princes 
and a vast concourse of people; all of whom were deter- 
mined to put an end to those abuses by which that ancient 
See had been so long distracted. In the mean time, a per- 
son named Niel, a brother (as it is supposed) of Celsus, bad 
been set up by the faction; but this intruder was soon com- 
pelled to leave Armagh, and in his flight he took with him 
the text of the Gospels which had belonged to St. Patrick 
together with the celebrated staff or crosier of that Apostle, 
usually called the Staff of Jesus. After St. Malachy had 
presided over the See for five years, he resigned and, as has 



325 

been already noticed^ repaired to Down, having appointed 
as his successor* 

Gelasius (Gilla-tnac-Liegt)^ Abbot of Deny and Arch- 
deacon of that diocess. Geiasius had been present at the 
Synod of Kells, and in 1162 he held a Synod at Clane in the 
County of Kildare, at which twenty-six bishops and many 
abbots attended. In this Synod several decrees relative to 
discipline and morals were passed, and among others it was 
unanimously ordered, that henceforth no person should be 
appointed as professor of theol<^y in any of the schools of 
Ireland, unless he had previously studied for some time at 
Armagh. Gelasius died on the 27th of March^ A.D. 1174 
and in the 87th year of his age. 

Cornelius, Abbot of the Monastery of St. Peter and St« 
Paul at Armagh, was on the death of Gelasius promoted to 
the archiepiscopal chair. This prelate soon after his conse- 
cration set out for Rome, in which city he died on the year 
following and was succeeded by 

Gilbert O'Caran, Bishop of Raphoe; from which See 
he had been translated, after the death of Cornelius. Gil- 
bert died A.D. 1180 and had as successor Thomas O'Con- 
nor. This Prelate, however, after having presided only four 
years, vtrithdrew to his favourite retirement and resigned the 
See to 

McBLiosA O'Carrol, Bishop of Clogher. The incum- 
bency of Mceliosa viras but of short continuance. Soon after 
his translation he undertook a journey to Rome and died on 
his way thither 1184. 

Amlavb O'Murid, his successor, governed the See but 
one year, and on his death in 1185 

Thomas O'Connor, who had resigned the Arcbdiocess to 

• A. A. S. S. at 27th March. 
<t Gilla-mac-Lieg ; that is, Gilla son of the Scholar ; his father Roderic being dift« 
tinguiflhed in those days as a learned antiquarian. The name has been latinized 
Gelasius, 



326 

McBliosa O'Carrol^ now resumed the government of it — 
Thomas continued to preside over the Primatial See for six- 
teen years and is styled in the Annals of St. Mary's Abbey, 
Dublin, ^'a noble and a religious man." He died in 1201 and 
was interred in the Abbey of Mellifont.* 

In treating of the episcopal sees we shall commence with 
that of 

LiHBRiCK. Although the Danish inhabitants of this city 
had been converted to the Christian faith in the early part of 
the eleventh century, nevertheless they enjoyed not the bene- 
fit of a resident prelate until the year 1106, about which 
time Gillebert vms unanimously chosen by both cle^y and 
people.t Gillebert had been Abbot of Bangor and was 
most probably a Bishop before the clergy of Limerick had 
invited him to that city. It has been conjectured by some 
that he was a Dane, because at that time Limerick had been 
a Danish town; such, however, is not the fact. That Gille-* 
bert was an Irishman and had received his consecration in 
Ireland appears evident from the correspondence which had 
taken place between him and St. Anslem, with whom he be- 
came acquainted in his travels on the C!ontinent. Gillebert, 
during his incumbency, exerted himself in bringing the litur- 
gical practices of Ireland into one uniform system; for which 
purpose he composed a treatise entitled De usu Ecclesiastieo. 
In this tract he tells the prelates and priests of Ireland, that 
in compliance with the wishes of many of them, he has en- 
deavoured to point out the canonical custom in saying the 
hours and in performing the offices of the whole ecclesiastical 
order. He has also written another tract, under the title 
De Statu EcclesuB^ in which he arranges the different gra- 

• Ware — Harris' Bishops. 

t According to Ware and some other writerB, St. Munchin had been the first 
Bishop of Limerick in the seventh century. The advocates of this opinion have 
not» however, beea^le to prodnce a single prelate in the See of Limerick, from the 
days of that Saint down to the time of Gillebert in 1 106.»See cent. VIL c. ui. 



327 

dations of bishops, archbisbops, primates and popes, and 
the orders of the ostiarii, lectors, exorcists, acolythes, sub- 
deacons, deacons and priests, assigning at the same time 
their respective powecs and duties. 

It has been already noticed that Gillebert was l^ate apos- 
tolic, which office he resigned in 1139, and during the fol* 
lowing year was succeeded in the See of Limerick by 

Patbick. This Prelate, owing to the influence of the 
Danes, was sent to England, where he was consecrated by 
Theobald Archbishop of Canterbury. Patrick, at his con- 
secration, made the following profession: ^' I Patrick, elected 
to the government of the Church of Limerick and now, 
through the grace of God, to be consecrated bishop by thee> 
most reverend Father Theobald, Archbishop of the holy 
Church of Canterbury, and Primate of all Britain, do pro- 
mise that I will pay due subjection and canonical obedience 
in every respect to thee and to all thy successors, who shall 
succeed thee canonically."* Patrick was the only Bishop of 
Limerick and the last of any of the Irish bishops who bad 
made a profession of obedience to the See of Canterbury. — 
His three successors, Harold, Turgese and Brictius had been 
Danes, but were consecrated in Ireland. At length 

Donald O'Briak, descended from the royal family of the 
O' Brians of Thomond, became Bishop of Limerick towards 
the close of the twelfth century. 

DsRav was in this century raised to the rank of ah Epis- 
copal See : Flathbbrt O'Brolchan Abbot of the Monas- 
tery of Derry having been appointed its first Bishop.f This 

• Ware Bishops— Usher, Syl. 

t From this foundation of the See of Derry in 1158 a difficulty arises, which 
does not appear to have been as yet satisfoctorily explained. It may be recollected 
that, in the list of the episcopal sees drawn up in the Synod of Kells, the See of 
Derry is marked as one of the suffragan sees belonging to Armagh. Again, in the 
Synod of Bath-Breasail, held thirty.four years prior to that of Kells, the See of 
Derry is al:io placed in the catalogue of bishoprics; nevertheless, we find in all our 



328 

election took place in a synod held at Brigh-Thaig in Meath 
(in 1158) and at which Gelasius and Christian, then Bishop 
of Lismore and legate apostolic, with twenty-five other 
bishops were present.* It has been already noticed that St. 
Eugene had, in the sixth century, fixed his see at Ardsrath, 
in the now County of Tyrone. This See was afterwards 
translated to Moghera, eight miles distant; the bishops of 
which were styled Episcopi Rathlurienses, from St Luroch, 
whose principal church had been greatly venerated in that 
ancient place.f The See of Deny, however, having been now 
established, this See of Rathlure was soon after annexed to 
it. In 1164 Flathbert with the assistance of Mac-Laughlin, 
King of Ireland, founded the Cathedral Church of Derry. — 
He died in 1175 and was succeeded by Maurice O'CofFy, a 

• Tr. Th. p. 309. f Ware Bisbopt. 

aontU the foundatioa of the See of Derry aasig^ned to the Synod of Brigh-Thaig io 
1 158. If Derry had oot been a See until 1 158, why was it marked in the list of sees 
at KelU in 1152, or in that of Rath-Breasail in 1118? Dr. Lanigan is of opinion, 
that Cencius Camerariiis (Ilonoiius III, from whom JKeating^ Ware and others 
have taken their list) must have made a mistake in the catalogue of the episcopal 
sees which he drew up in his work entitled Censtis CameraUs (chap, xxvii. N. 106). 
But how is it probable that this mistake could occur, not only with respect to the 
list furnished by the Synod of Kells, but likewise with that which had been drawn 
up at the Synod of Rath-Breasail ? It is moreover certain, that Cardinal Paparo 
had, on his return to Rome, brought with him a catalogue of the episcopal sees of 
Ireland, as determined upon at the Synod of Kells ; and it is equally certain, that 
Cencitts Camerarius had access to that authentic, genuine document. The proba- 
bility is, that in these Synods of Rath-Breasail and Kells, and particularly in the 
latter, it had been agreed upon, to raise Derry to the rank of an Espiscopal See, 
altogether distinct and independent of the ancient bishopric of Lathlure (or Ards- 
rath), the prelates of which had jurisdiction over the district of Derry and consider- 
able influence with the princes of the north of Ireland. Maurice O'CofTy, who 
was Bishop of Rathlure (or as it had been also called Kmel-Eogain) at the time of 
the Council of Kells, was a Prelate greatly esteemed as well by the same dynasts 
as by the clergy of that extensive district. Owing, therefore, to the influence of 
these prelates and perhaps to some unavoidable local circumstances, the actual con- 
secration of a bishop for Derry might have been postponed until 1 158. Hence we 
And that after the resignation of Flathbert, first Bishop of Derry, the See of Rath- 
lure was annexed tl^ereto, and the same Maurice O'Coflfy, having removed to 
Derry, became in fact the regular and sole Bishop of the union. 



3-29 

Canon of the order of St. Augustine and heretofore Bishop 
of Rathlure-* 

The See of Aghadoe in Kerry appears to have been 
united to* that of Ardfert about the year USS.f The history 
of this See has not been satisfactorily accounted for by any 
of our annalists. It is generally supposed to have taken its 
rise from the Monastery of Innisfallen. This opinion is ap- 
parently confirmed by the fact, that its cathedral had been 
dedicated to St. Finian^ from which Saint that Monastery 
derived its foundation. In 1158 the gveat church of Agha- 
doe was completed by Aulifie-mor^ son of Aengus O'Do- 
noughue and Prince of that territory. It appears that the 
diocess of Ajdiert comprized the northern part of Kerry, 
wJnJe the southern part belonged to that oi* Aghadoe.§ 

Before the close of the twelfth century, several of the 
ni^inor sees had been discontinued and became united to 
others. The ancient See of Roscrea was united to that of 
Killaloe in 1195; and about the same time the See of Innis- 
«atthy became united to that of Limerick, while its posses- 
sions were divided between the Sees of Limerick, Killaloe 
and Ardfert.|( The Sees of Ardcam, Dumclive, ]^nd Ros- 
common were annexed to Elphin. The diocess of Cong be- 
came united ito Tuam; while the ancient Sees of Kells, Slane, 
Duleek, Ardbraccan, Trim, Skrme, Fore and I)unshaugh- 
lin were aU merged in and united to Meath. 

Dublin. — On the death of Samuel O'Haipgly in 1121, 
Celsus, who was then Archbishop of Armagh, had by the 
consent of many of the Irish and Danes of Dublin been 
appointed their Bishop.^ This step was taken for the pur- 
pose of bringing that See under, the jurisdiction of the Pri- 
mate of Ireland, and of putting an end to the authority of 

• Ware's Bishops. t Harris* Bbhops. % Smith, Hist, of Kerry, p. 67, 

$ Harris' Bishop^?. || Rochfort's Constitutions (up Wilkin's Concilia vol. I.) 

f Four Masters, 

2t 



330 

the See of Canterbury. It is probable, however, that Cel- 
SQ8 did not undertake the government of the Diocess of 
Dublin; for it appears that a great majority of the burgesses 
and clergy of the city opposed this appointment and elected 
Gbbooht, who was not as yet a deacon, for their Bishop.* 
In this election the Danish inhabitants bad been assisted by 
Turlogh O'Conor, King of Connaught, to whom Dublin was 
at that time subject. According to custom Gr^ry was sent 
by the Danish electors to Canterbury, on which occasion he 
was furnished with a letter from Turlogh O'Connor to Henry 
I, King of England. Gregory, on his arrival, was ordained 
Deacon and Priest by Roger, Bishop of Salisbury, and 
shortly after was consecrated Bishop by Ralph, Archbishop 
of Canterbury. The consecration took place at Lambeth on 
the 2nd of October, 1121, at which he made the following 
profession of obedience: ''I Gregory, elected to the govern- 
ment of the Church of Dublin, which is situated in Ireland, 
and to be consecrated by thee. Reverend Father Ralph, Arch- 
bishop of the holy Church of Canterbury and Primate of all 
Britain, do promise that I will observe, in every respect, 
canonical obedience to thee and all thy successors."t Gre- 
gory had governed the See for thirty*one years when he re- 
ceived the pallium from Cardinal Paparo in the Synod of 
Kells, and thus became the first Archbishop of Dublin. — 
His death occurred in 1161, in which year be was succeeded 
by the holy Abbot of Glendaloch. 

Laubevcb OToole. — ^The name of this distinguished Prel- 
ate has been here inserted, in order to notice the r^ular 
chain of succession, while the history of his administration 
as Abbot of Glendaloch and afterwards as Archbishop of 
Dublin shall be reserved for the third chapter. 

John Cuhin (or Comin), the successor of St. Laurence 
OToole, arrived in Dublin on the 8th of September, A.D. 

• Tr. Th. p. 309. f Ww, Biahops, 



831 

1184. This Prelate, after having been consecrated by Lucius 
III, obtained from that Pope a Bull dated 13th April, A.D. 
1182, by which the Pope decfrees, ^'That no archbishop or 
bishop do presume to hold meetings in the Diocess of Dub^- 
lin, or to treat of the ecclesiastical causes and affairs of said 
diocess, without the consent of the Archbishop of Dublin, 
if he (the Archbishop of Dublin) be actually in his bishopric 
or see, unless such other prelate be enjoined so to do by the 
Roman Pontiffor his legate."* From this Bull of Lucius 
III, or rather from the more ample one of Honorius III, in 
the thirteenth century, arose the famous controversy regard- 
ing the primatial rights which had so long subsisted between 
the Sees of Armagh and Dublin. The manifest object of 
this Bull was to exempt the See of Dublin from the exercise 
of that extensive and in fact arbitrary power which the arch- 
bishops of Armagh had, by ancient immemorial usage, 
claimed and enjoyed. It appears that, in those former 
times when the Primate of Armagh had been the only Arch- 
bishop in Ireland, he made a visitation of each diocess of the 
kingdom whenever he thought proper, and took into his own 
hands the uncontrolled management of their internal concerns; 
in short, he enjoyed a more ample plenitude of power and 
jurisdiction than the canon law of the twelfth century had 
allowed to any primate. This Bull, therefore, protects the 
See of Dublin from the extensive jurisdiction of Armagh, 
but by no means renders it independent of that See; nor 
does it encroach on the primatial privileges established in the 
Synod of Kells, and particularly in the case of appeals made 
to and to be decided by the^Primate in his ordinary eccle* 
siastical court at Armagh. 



* The following are the words of the original: "Sacroram quoque canonam 
authoritatem sequentes stataimus, at nullos archiepiscopus vel episcopus absque 
assensu Dubliniensis archiepiscopi, «t tit episcopatu futrit, in dioeceti Dubliniensi 
coaventus oelebrare, cauaas et ecclesiastica negotia ejusdem dioecesis, nisi per 
Komanum Pontiiicem vel legatum ejus fueriteideminjunctum, tractare prassamat/' 



332 

The obvious meaning, therefore, of the Bull of Lucius III 
ts, that while there is an archbishop of Dublin actually pre-^ 
siding over that diocess, no other prelate, not even the Pri- 
mate, shall attempt to hold meetings or discuss its affairs 
within the Diocess of Dublin except the Pope or his l^ate 
shall authorize him so to do ; nevertheless it by no means 
follows that such appeals may not be received and juridically 
decided by the Archbishop of Armagh or Primate in his owtf 
ecclesiastical court. It does not appear, however, that any 
of the primates of the twelfth century had remonstrated 
against this limitation of their prerogatives; the controversy 
on that subject, being of a much later date, emanated from 
the more ample exemptions contained in the Bull of Hono- 
rius III * 

Archbishop Cumin, in 1190, commenced the foundation of 
the Church of St. Patrick in Dublin, on the site of the old 
parochial church situated at the extremity of the south 
suburbs of the city. It' had at that time been constituted a 
collegiate church with thirteen prebends annexed to it, which 
number was afterwards increased to twenty-two. The charter 
of the Archbishop is in these words: "We decree, God wil- 
ling, with the approbation of the holy See of Rome and our 
Prince John, Earl of Morton, to make St. Patrick's 
Church in Dublin a pebendary aiid to institute therein a 
college of clerks, of good life and learning, who by their 
virtues and conversation may give example to others/'f This 
stately edifice was erected into a cathedral during the in- 
cumbency of his successor Henry de Loundres. 

The fashion of building churches of stone having now be- 
come very general in Ireland, several cathedrals date their 
foundation from this century* Among these the following 
may be briefly noticed: 

The Cathedral of St. Patrick in Down had been re- 
built 1 137 by St. Malachy, and about forty years afterwards 

• Sec Cent. XIII. chap. I. f Ware's Annalb. 



333 

Was enlarged and beautified by Malachy III, Bishop of 
Down, in which work he was munificently assisted by John 
De Courcey. In 1183, De Courcey removed the Secular 
Canons from the Cathedral and in their place introduced 
Benedictine monks, whom he brought from the Abbey of St. 
Werburg, in Chester. At that time also, this Church, which 
had been before consecrated to the Holy Trinity, was now 
dedicated to St. Patrick. 

The Cathedral of St. Mary in Tuam was founded 
about the year 1152 by Edan O'Hoisin, first Archbishop of 
Tuam and Tirdelvac O'Connor, King of Ireland.* Edan was 
interred in this Cathedral in 1161 and on his tomb was an 
Irish epitaph, in which he is called ^'Comorban, or successor 
of St. larlath.'^ Many of his successors had been benefectors 
to this Church and particularly Thomas O'Conor, in 1260, 
by whom a new choir was erected and the Church was con- 
siderably enlarged. 

The Cathedral of St. Columba in Derry, called in the 
Ulster Annals, the great Church of Derry, was founded in 
1164 by Maurice Mac-Laughlin, King of Ireland.f About 
that time Maurice O'Cofly, Bishop of Ardstrath, removed to 
Derry and afterwards effected a union of both Sees. Flath- 
bert O'Brolcan, Bishop of Derry and Abbot of St. Columba 
had been a particular benefactor to this Church. 

The Cathedral of St. Patrick in Cashel was erected 
and endowed by Donald O'Brian, King of North Munster, 
about the year 1170. This munificent Prince bestowed large 
revenues on the See of Cashel, which were afterwards aug- 
mented by the donations of his son Donagh. This spacious, 
and splendid Cathedral having been completed, the former 
Church of Cormac was converted into a Chapter-house, on 
the south side of the choir. Richard O'Heden, Archbishop of 
Cashel in 1420, was a munificent benefactor to this Church; 

• Ware's Antiq. c. 29. t W. 



334 

in that year he repaired and beautified the Cathedral, and 
erected a hall for the Vicars choral, to whom he made over 
the lands of Orange-Connel and Tburles-beg.* 

Thx Cathbdral of St. Mary in Liheriok was founded 
by Donald O'Brian, King of North Munster, about the year 
1170. During the incumbency of Brictius, in 1194, the fol- 
lowing charter was granted by the founder. ^'Domnald, 
King of Lumneach (Limerick) to all the faithful of God, both 
present and to come, greetmg. Know all, that I hare giren 
to Brictius, Bishop of Lumrueack^ and to his successors and 
to the clei^ of St. Mary's of XtciNfteaci, in free and perpe- 
tual alms, the land of Imungran (Mungret) and the land of 
Ivamnacham, from the Arch of Imungram to the land of 
Imalin, and from the ford of Ceinu to the river iStnan, with 
all its appurtenances; and in confirmation hereof I set my 
seal, witness Matthew (O'Heney) Archbishop of Cashel and 
Ruadri 0'Gradei."t About the close of the twelfth century, 
Donagh O'Brian, Bishop of Limerick, appointed Prebends 
to the Dean and Chapter, while their number was afterwards 
increased by Hubert De Burgo, Bishop of that See in 1250* 

The Cathbdral of St. Canice in Kilkenny, This 
episcopal See, which had first been at Saigar in Ely O'Carol, 
(King's County) was removed to Aghaboe in Upper Ossory 
about the middle of the eleventh century, and from thence 
was, in 1178, translated to Kilkenny by Felix O'DuUany, 
then Bishop of Ossory .f At this period, also, the spacious 

♦ Ware*» Antiq. c 29. t Id. 

X In aasigning the above date for the translation of this See to Kilkenny the chr«- 
Dology of Ware has been followed — Usher, however, refers to a catalogue of bishops 
•f Ossory, (Pr. p. 957.) from which a contrary statement appears j the words of this 
catalogue are :— " A. D, MCCII. obiit Reverendus Pater Felix O'Dulane Episco- 
pus Ossoriensis, cujus Ecciesia Cathedralis tuno trat apud Aghboo in 5uptrt0rt Ot" 
soria" Should this document be correct, it would follow that the translation of the 
See had not taken place until after the death of Felix O'Dulany ; unless perhaps 
that this Prelate might have continued to reside occasionally at Aghaboe, the build- 
ing of the Cathedral at Kilkenny not having been at that time completed. 



336 

and beautiful Cathedral of Kilkenny was founded by that 
Prelate and dedicated to the holy Abbot St. Canice.* This 
venerable pile, having braved the storms and unsparing fury 
of angry times, stands in the nineteenth century an existing 
monument of the architectural skill, but much more of the 
piety and 2eal of our happy and religious forefathers. The 
Cathedral, which is purely gothic, was not, however, finished 
until the time of Bishop St. Leger in 1286, and about thirty 
years afterwards Richard Ledred, of the order of St. Francis 
and Bishop of Ossory, repaired and beautified the interior of 
the Church with polished marble and windows of curi&us 
workmanship. But that, which renders this Cathedral par- 
ticularly admired and not to be equalled by any thing of this 
sort in the kingdom, is its grand and lovely situation. It 
stands on an eminence of easy and gentle ascent, having its 
base washed by the waters of the winding Nore. The ancient 
and historically-iamed City of Kilkenny, with its abbies, 
towers and castles in ruins, the pride of former days, is dis- 
tinctly presented to the view, while the commanding prospect 
of the surrounding country, rich and luxuriant as it is, serves 
at once to embellish and complete the scene. At a short dis- 
tance from the Church, stands one of those round towers, for 
which Ireland is remarkable, and which have given rise to so 
much discussion among our antiquarians.f 

From the twelfth century may likewise be dated the foun- 
dation of several splendid monasteries, belonging either to 
the Cistercians or to the Canons Regular of St. Augustin. 
The former of these monastic communities had been intro- 
duced into Ireland by St. Malachy, and the latter either by 
that Saint or by Imar his master at Armagh. The Canons 
Regular of St Augustin, having united the active with the 
contemplative life, approached nearer than any other order to 
the ancient monastic institutions of Ireland,^: and hence this 

• Ware's Antiq. t See Cent. vi. c. 2. t See Cent. v. p. 29, 



336 

invaluable body spread most extensively throughout the 
kingdom. The following monastic foundations of the twelfth 
century may serve to give us some idea of the religious spirit 
of those times. 

PRIORIBS OF THE CANONS REGULAR OF ST. AUGUSTIN. 

The Priort of Sts. Peter and Paul at Armagh was 
re-founded by Imar the saintly and learned master of St. 
Malachy.* Some authorities, however, ascribe its original 
foundation to Imar, and consider it as an institution al- 
together distinct from the ancient monastery which had con- 
tinued to flourish here since the days of St. Patrick. What- 
ever variety of opinion may arise on the subject of its foun- 
dation, it is at all events certain that its church having been 
erected by Imar was consecrated in 1126, and that it had 
been the first establishment in this country into which that 
religious community, designated Canons Regular of SL 
Avgtistin, had been introduced. In process of time it be- 
came amazingly enriched, and among other tokens of patron- 
age, it received from the Monarch Roderic O'Conor an an- 
nual pension for the purpose of having a public school at- 
tached to it. Notwithstanding the furious attacks which on 
sundry occasions it had sustained from De Courcey, Fitz- 
Adelm, De Lacy and other adventurers, this venerable Priory 
was upheld until the era of general confiscation had been 
ushered in under Henry VIII. Its possessions, which were 
immense and of which a brief outline has been already 
given,t were subjected to three formal inquisitions; the first 
in 1539 under Henry, the second in 1667 under Elizabeth 
and the third under James I in 1603.{ In May 1612, this 
Priory and its possessions were granted to Sir Toby Caulfield 
at a rent of five pounds Irish.§ 

• Ware's Antiq. c. XXVI. t See Cent. V. c. II. p. 49. J King, p. 233,333. 
§ Lodge, V.III.p. 86, 



337 

Thb Priory ov Selsker at Wexford, under the invoca- ^' 
ti6n of Sts. Peter and Paul, had, according to the most ap- 
proved opinion, been founded by the Danes in the early part 
of the twelfth century, for Canons Regular of St. Augustin ; 
while the Roches (de Rupe) a noble and an influential family, 
have been numbered among its most munificent benefactors.* 
In subsequent times it had been peculiarly patronized and 
especially by Henry IV and by Sir John Talbot, afterwards 
Lord Talbot of Fumeval and Wexford. The Prior of Sels- 
ker sat as a baron in parliament. The first inquisition taken 
in the 31st year of the reign of Henry the VIII found in the 
possession of the last prior, John Heygarne, four orchards, 
two parks, fifteen messuages with their gardens and the 
rectories of St. Patrick, Sts. Peter and Paul and St. Tullogh 
in the town of Wexford : two hundred and sixty acres of land 
and eighteen capons, together with the rectories of Kilma- 
chree, Killane, St. Margaret, Ballynane, Slaney, Killuske 
and various others in the County of Wexford. In the first 
year of Edward VI, this Priory and the greater part of its 
possessions were granted to John Parker, in capite, at the 
annual rent of fifteen shillings.+ 

The Priory of Knock, in the County of Louth, was 
founded by Donogh O'Carrol, Prince of Oriel and Edan 
O'Kelly, Bishop of Clogher, in 1148, for Canons Regular of 
St. Augustin. J Property to a considerable amount had been 
bequeathed to this Priory by the founders and by other Irish 
benefactors; nevertheless in 1417 the Prior, James Lockard, 
was punished by a fine, for having allowed John Mac Ken- 
navan, a mere Irishman, to make his profession in this estab- 
lishment ;§ an event which, with many others of a similar 
import, may enable us to fonn some idea of the anti-national 
spirit of those times. An inquisition was instituted in the 
31st of Henry VIII, when the possessions were X 

• Ware's Mon. t Aud. Gen. t Ware's Mon. 



338 

consist of one hundred and twenty acres of arable land in 
Knock and three hundred and fifty acres in other parts of 
the County. These with the tithes of Grange, Castlering 
and other townlands were conferred by James I on Sir John 
King.* 

Thb Priory of Fbrns was founded in the year 116L-— 
The ancient Abbey of FemSi after having flourished for more 
than five centuries from the date of its erection by St. Aidan, 
was set on fire together with the town of Ferns by Dermod 
Mac Morogh.t That Prince, desirous of making some pub- 
lic atonement for his glaring acts of profanation, caused the 
Abbey to be re-built for Canons Regular of St. Augustin 
and endowed it with six extensive townlands. Dermod, 
after having lived to an advanced age, died in 1171 and was 
buried in this Priory. From the munificent grants which 
had, at subsequent periods, been conferred on this founda- 
tion, it became an invaluable asylum for the poor and conr 
tinued its works of charity until the 31st of Henry VIII. In 
that year the following lands, parcel of its possessions, be- 
came merged in the general confiscation: one hundred and 
twenty acres in the town, called Abbot's-garden, one hundred 
and twenty acres in Moghane, one hundred and twenty-six 
acres in Ballimore, two hundred and twenty acres in Bally- 
ntogher and other places, together with the tithes and alter- 
ages of the same. In the 26th of Elizabeth, a lease of this 
Priory was given to Thomas Masterson at the annual rent of 
£16 Is. 2d.J 

Thb Priory of All Saints, on Hoggin Green now called 
College Green, in Dublin, was founded in 1166 by Dermod 
Mac Morogh for Canons Regular of the Congregation of 
Aroasia.§ This Priory had been richly endowed by the 
founder and by Theobald Butler, Lord Justice of Ireland in 
1247. Its priors were lords of Parliament, the last of whom 

• King. p. 264. t A. A. S. S. p. 223. $ Aud. Geo. § Harris' Collect. 



339 

was Walter Handcock. In 1638, a grant of this Priory and 
of its possessions, consisting of one thousand seven hundred 
acres of arable and pasture land, three hundred acres of 
wood and moor with their appurtenances in Rathdrum and 
Ballynegannagh, and the rectories of St. Paul| Tachto, 
Rathdrum and St. Saviour at Glendaloch, was made to the 
City of Dublin, at the annual rent of £4 48.* The Priory of 
All Saints was granted in 1590 for an University, and ac- 
cordingly the ancient building having been demolished, the 
present College was erected on the site thereof.f 

The Phiory op St. Thomas (Bbcret) was erected by 
William Fitz^Adelm for Canons Regular of the Order of St. 
Victor, on the site now called Thomas Court in Dublin, 
about the year 1177. This Abbey became m after times 
splendidly endowed, the Prior of which was a Lord of Parlia- 
ment In 1534, the last Prior, Henry Duffe, made* a sur- 
render of the establishment and received an annual pension 
of £42. By the second scrutiny instituted in the 31st of 
Henry Vill, the Prior was seized of the manor and two 
hundred acres of arable land in Kyll, three hundred and 
twenty acres m Artherstown and Alliston together with the 
tithes of eight townlands, all situated in the County of Kil- 
dare. The possessions of this Priory were granted to several 
persons and particularly to William Brabazon, ancestor to 
the Eari of Meath.j: 

The Priort of Kells, in the Barony of Kells and 
County of Kilkenny, was founded, under the invocation of 
the blessed Virgin Mary, by GeofTry Fitz-Robert, for Canons 
Regular of St. Augustin in 1193. This foundation was con- 
firmed by Felix O'DuUany, Bishop of Ossory and by various 
charters during the reigns of Richard II, Henry IV and 
other monarchs.§ The Prior of Kells sat as a Baron in 
Parliament. Its last Prior was Philip Holegan, under 

* Aud. Gen. t Ware*8 Annals. t Lodge, vol. I. f Dugdale, vol. II. 



340 

whom, in the 31st of Henry VIII, its possessions had been 
surrendered: viz., forty^five messuages and two hundred and 
ten acres of arable land in Kells, together with thirty-three 
messuages, three water mills and eleven hundred acres of 
wood and arable land in Desert, Grange and other parts of 
the County of Kilkenny, and the rectories of Kells, Knoc- 
topher, Kilmaganey, Bumchurch and twelve others, all sit-* 
uated in said county. This Priory and six carucates of land 
with the rectory of Kells were granted, in capite, to James, 
Earl of Ormond.* 

The Priory of Sts. Peter and Paul in Clare, was 
erected for Canons Regular by Donald O'Brian. In 1620, 
this Priory with nine rectories was granted to Donogh, Earl 
of Thomond.t 

The Priory op Kilrush, in the County of Kildare, was 
founded at the close of the 12th century, for Canons Regu- 
lar, by William, Earl of Pembroke. At the suppression it 
was granted to the Earl of Ormond.;}: 

TnE Priory of Naas, was founded about the same period 
by a Baron of Naas, for Canons Regular. This Priory with 
its possessions was granted by Elizabeth to Richard Manner- 

The Priory of Inisnegananagh, in the Shannon, near 
Thomond, had for its founder Donald O'Brian, at the close 
of the 12th century. In 1609 a grant of it was made to 
Donogh, Earl of Thomond. || 

The Priory of St. Mary in Navan, County of Meath, 
was founded for Canons Regular by Joceline de Angulo or 
Nangle. This Priory and three hundred and sixty acres of 
land were granted at an annual rent to Robert Dillon.^^ 

The Priory of Colpe, in the County of Meath, had 
Hugh De Lacy for its founder. Its property, which consisted 

• Aud. Gen. t Rolls. t Aud. Gen. $ Harris' Collect. 

11 RolU. f Aud.Geu. 



341 

mostly of tithes in various couuties, became merged in the 
general confiscation. 

The Priory op Ballybogan (De Laude Dei) County of 
Meathy was founded for Canons Regular by Jordan Comin 
at the close of the 12th century. This establishment was 
surrendered in the 19th of Henry VIII, when its possessions 
were found to consist of five thousand two hundred acres of 
arable and pasture land in various counties. The Priory 
with various parcels of its possessions was granted to Sir 
William Birmingham at an annual rent of £4 3s. 4d.'*^ 

If to these may be added a considerable number of the 
ancient monastic foundations of the kingdom, which about 
this period had adopted the rule of the Canons Regular of 
St. Augustin, it may be seen to what an extent this learned 
body had diffused itself over Ireland, before even the com- 
mencement of the thirteenth century. 

ABBIES OF THE CISTERCIAN ORDER FOUNDED IN THE 
TWELFTH CENTURY. 

The Abbey of Mellifont, in the Barony of Ferrard and 
County of Louth, was founded for Cistercian monks in 1142 
by Donogh O'Carrol, King of Oriel, and was supplied with 
monks by St. Bernard from the Abbey of Clairvaux.f Mel- 
lifont was the most ancient monastery of the Cistercian 
Order in Ireland, having for its first Abbot Christian O'Con- 
archy, afterwards Bishop of Lismore and legate apostolic. — 
In 1167 a Synod was held here for the purpose of consecrat- 
ing the church, and at which, besides the legate, several 
princes and bishops of the kingdom attended.^: Among 
other offerings made on this occasion was one from the cele- 
brated Dervorgill, wife of O'Rouarc, Prince of Breffny. — 
She gave sixty ounces of Gold, with a chalice of the same 

* And. GcR. t Clynn. AnDaU. t Four Masten. 



342 

metal for the high altar, and presented furniture for nuie 
other altars. The abbots of Mellifont sat as barons in Par* 
liament; the last of whom, Richard Gonter, received on its 
suppression in 1640, an annual pension of £40 for life. — 
According to the last inquisition, the possessions consisted 
of one hundred acres, being the demense land, five water 
mills, eight messuages and two hundred and fifty-fire acnes 
of land in the Sheep-Orange, together with seventy-two 
messuages and two thousand acres in the county of Louth. 
The property in the County of Meath amounted to one 
hundred and eighty-one messuages and two thousand five 
hundred and ninety-six acres of arable and pasture land, be- 
sides the tithes of various rectories in both counties. These 
extensive possessions belonging to the Abbey were granted 
to Sir Gerald Moore * 

The Abbey of St. Mary in Dublin was erected by the 
Danes, but the date of its foundation has not been accurately 
ascertained. Some annalists mark it at the year 948, yet 
this statement cannot be consistently admitted. It was cer« 
tainly in existence in the Ilth century and it is equally un- 
deniable that the Cistercians had been introduced here in the 
year llSQ.f The Abbot of St. Mary's sat as a Baron in 
Parliament, while the establishment, faom the bequests of 
princes, prelates and others, became exceedingly rich. — 
William Laundy, the last Abbot, received in 1540 an annual 
pension of £50, at which period one thousand nine hundred 
and forty-eight acres, parcel of its property situated in the 
Counties of Dublin and Meath, had been confiscated. A 
considerable part of the possessions had been consigned to 
Maurice, Earl of Thomond and to James, Earl of Desmond. 
In 1543, the Abbey was granted to James, Earl of Kildare, 
but on condition that he and his heirs would forfeit it, should 
they attempt at any time to confederate with the Irish.j; — 

* Harris' tab. t Annal ejusdcm Mon. ^ Lodge, vol. I. 



343 

This Abbey was^ howevery in the 24th year of Elizabeth, 
presented to Thomas, Earl of Ormond, in common soccage, 
at the annual rent of five shillings, Irish money. 

Thb Abbey of Bectiff, in the Barony of Navan and 
County of Meath, was erected in 1146 by 'Mac Laughlin, 
King of Meath, for Cistercians. The Abbot of Bectiff was 
a Lord of Parliament. In the 34th of Henry VIII, the pos- 
sessions, amounting to twenty messuages and one thousand 
two hundred acres of arable and pasture land in the County 
of Meath, became involved in the common confiscation.* 

The Abbey op Baltinglass (de Valle Salutis) in the 
Barony of Talbotstown, County of Wicklow, was founded 
in 1151 for Cistercian monks, by Dermod Mac Morogh, 
King of Leinster.f In the year 1380 it was enacted in Par- 
liament, ''that no mere Irishman should be allowed to make 
his profession here." The Abbot of Baltinglass sat as a 
Baron in Parliament. Its last Abbot was John Galbally in 
1536. By an inquisition taken in the 33rd of Henry VIII 
the possessions were, forty acres of pasture, one hundred of 
wood, a mill and water course in Baltinglass, together with 
thirty messuages and seven hundred and twenty acres of 
arable and pasture land in various parts of the Counties of 
Wicklow and Kildare. This Abbey and its possessions were 
granted to Thomas Eustace, Viscount Baltinglass; and by 
the 30th of Elizabeth a second grant was made to Sir Henry 
Harrington to hold in capite for ever, at the annual rent of 
£11 19s. Irish money. j; 

The Abbey of Nbnay, in the Barony of Poble O'Brian 
and County of Limerick, was founded by Donald O'Brian 
for Cistercians, A.D. 1151. The Abbot was a Baron of Par- 
liament. At the suppression this Abbey, with nine townlands, 
parcel of the possessions, was given to Sir Henry Wallop.^ 

The Abbey of Odorney (called Kyrie Eleison), in the 

• Chief Remem. t Ware's Anliq. t Aud. Gen, $ Id, 



344 

Barony of Clanmaurice and County of Kerry, was founded 
for Cistercians in 1157. The Abbot was a Baron of Parlia- 
ment. In 1537 a grant was made of this Abbey to Edmund, 
Lord Kerry, then created Baron of Odorney. By the 39th 
of Elizabeth a parcel of the possessions was granted to the 
Provost and Fellows of Trinity College, Dublin.* 

The Abbey of Newry (De Viridi Ligno), in the County 
of Down, was erected in 1156 for Cistercians by Murtogh 
Mac Laughlin, King of Ireland. Edward III seized on the 
lands of this Abbey, alledging "that the community had 
been mere Irish."f The last Abbot was John Prole. This 
Abbey was granted by Edward VI to Sir Nicholas Bagnal.J 

The Abbey of Fermoy (De Castro Dei), County of Cork, 
dates its foundation from the year 1170. In the 33rd of 
Elizabeth this Cistercian Abbey with eighteen townlands on 
the south-side of the Blackwater was granted to Sir Richard 
Grenville, at a rent of £15 18s. 4d.§ 

The Abbey op Boyle, in the County of Roscommon. — 
The Cistercians of Grelacdinach removed here in 1171. — 
Tomultach Mac Dermot was its last Abbot. By the inqui- 
sition under Elizabeth, its possessions amounted to two 
thousand three hundred and fifty acres in various counties. 
Elizabeth made a grant of this Abbey and of its possessions 
to Patrick Cusack, In 1G03 a second grant of this Abbey 
was made to Sir John King.|| 

The Abbey of Maur (De Fonte Vivo), at Carigiliky in 
the West Carbery, County of Cork, was founded by Der- 
mod Mac-Cormac-Mac-Carthy, King of Desmond, for Cis- 
tercians, in 1172. This Abbey and fourteen townlands with 
several rectories were granted in the 30th of Elizabeth to 
Nicholas Walsh, at the annual rent of £28 6s. 6d.f 

The Abbey of St. Mary, Monaster-evan (De Rosea 

• Chief Remem. t King, p. 135. t Aud, Gen. § Id. || Lodg«, vol. IV. 
If Aud. Gen. 



345 

Valle), in the County of Kildare, was founded for Cistercians 
by Dermod O'Dempeey^ Prince of Ophaly, in the year 1178. 
In 1297 the Abbot was accused of having received many of 
the Irish into this Monastery; he was acquitted by the jury, 
but was fined half a marc^ because, as the court stated, ^'he 
did not raise the hue and cry against them." The Abbot of 
Monasterevan sat as a Baron in Parliament. At the time of 
the general suppression, this Abbey was granted to George, 
Lord Audley. It was afterwards assigned to Adam Loflus, 
Viscount Ely, and finally fell into the possession of the Earl 
of Drogheda.* 

TflE Abbey of Ashro (De Samario), near Ballyshannon, 
County of Donegal, was founded by Roderic O'Canavan, 
Prince of Tir-connel, for Cistercians in 1179. In the 31st 
of Elizabeth, the possessions amounting to fifly-three quar- 
ters of land and the tithes of eleven townlands became 
merged in the general confiscation.t 

Thb Abbey of Jerpoint, in the Barony of Knoctopher and 
County of Kilkenny, was founded for Cistercians in 1180, 
by Donald, Prince of Ossory. The founder and Felix 
O'DulIany, Bishop of Ossory, were interred in this Abbey. 
Although this extensive foundation had been splendidly en- 
dowed by Donald and other chieftains of Ossory, it had not, 
however, been exempted from the illiberal enactments of the 
14th century. In 1380 i{ was ordained by Parliament that 
''no mere Irishman should be permitted to make his profes- 
sion in this Abbey." The abbots of Jerpoint were lords of 
Parliament, the last of whom was Oliver Grace. By an in- 
quisition taken in the 31st of Henry VIII, the possessions 
consisted of fifteen messuages and two hundred and twenty- 
four acres of arable and pasture land in Jerpoint; together 
with four water mills, forty-three messuages wd one thousand 
three hundred and twenty acres of land in various parts of 

•Kin^. p.377. t Id. p. 403. 

2x 



346 

the county: also the rectories of Jerpoint, the Rowre, Biancb- 
^rstown and foarteen others, all situated in the County of 
Kilkenny. These possessions were granted to James, £arl 
of Ormond, to hold in capite, at the annual rent of 
£49 38. 9d.» 

The Abbey of Middlbtom (De Choro), in the Barony of 
Imokilly and County of Cork, dates its foundation from the 
year 1160. In the 16th century, this Cistercian Abbey be- 
came numbered among the ruins of the country. 

Black Abbbt, of St. Andrew de Stokes, in the Ardes, 
County of Down, had for its founder John De Courccy, in 
1 180. It was a Benedictine Monastery and was granted to- 
gether with various townslands by James I, to Viscount 
Clandeboys.f 

Tns Abbby o^ Iniscourcby, situated in a peninsula in 
the County of Down, was erected for Cistercians by John 
De Courcey in 1180, immediately after that adventurer had 
demolished the ancient Abbey of Carrig. By the enactments 
of 1380, ''no mere Irishman had been allowed to make his 
profession in this Abbey/' In the 16th century it was given 
with deven carucates of land to Gerald, Earl of Kikiarcj: 

The Abbby of Holy Cross, in the Barony of Eliogurty 
and County of Tipperary, was founded in 1182 by Donald 
O'Drian, King of North Munster, in honour of the Holy 
Cross, for monks of the Cistercian Order. Its Abbot was 
styled Earl of Holy Cross: he was a Lord of Parliament 
and Vicar General of the Cistercians in Ireland. The last 
Abbot Was AVilIiam O'Dwyre. In the Sth of Elizabeth the 
Abbey and two hundred and twenty aeres of land in Holy 
Cross, twenty acres in Thurles and one hundred and eighty 
acres in other places, parcel of its possessions, were granted 
to Gerald, Earl of Ormond.§ The architecture of this 
Abbey was uncommonly splendid. The very ruins, which 

* Aud. Gen. f Harris' tab. f Aud.Gen, $Id. 



347 

to this day occupy a conBiderable space, may serve to point 
out (he former greatness of this once celebrated establish- 
ment Its steeple, supported by an immense Gothic arch 
with a display of Ogires springing diagonally from the 
angles, has been greatly admired. The choir is forty^nine 
feet brdad and fifty-eight feet long with lateral aisles. On 
the south-side of the choir are two chapels, intersected by a 
double row of Gothic arches; and on the north^side are two 
other chapels, finished in the same style as the former* The 
river Sttir flows near the base of these eictensive and awfully 
magnificent ruins. 

Thb Abbbt of Dunbroby (Portus Saacttt Mari^B), in the 
Barony of Shelbume and County of Wexfcnrd, was founded 
in 1182. Hervey de Monte Morisco, Seneschal of the es* 
tates belonging to Strongbow, made a considerable grant of 
lands to St. Mary and to St. Benedict, an4 to the monks of 
Bildewas in Shropshire, for the purpose of erecting an abbey 
here for Cistercians; Felix 0*Dullany, Bishop of Ossory, 
being one of the witnesses of the charter* Hervey^ the 
founder of this Abbey, became soon after a monk in the 
Monastery of the Holy Trinity, io Canterbury. In 1380^ it 
was enacted ''that no mere Irishman be suffered to profess in 
this Abbey." The Abbot of Dunbrody sat as a Baron in 
Parliament Alexander Devereux, the last Abbot, sur- 
rendered the establishment in 1639, after having first pro- 
vided for his relations by the sacrilegious plunder of its posses- 
sions.* By an inquisition taken in the 37tb of Henry VIII 
this Abbey was found to possess sixty acres of pasture and 
an extensive grange in Dunbrody, one hundred and twenty 
acres in Battlestown, eighty acres in Duncannon, sixty acres 
in Clonard and eleven hundred and thirty acres of arable and 
pasture land in various parts of ilie County of Wexford ; be- 
sides immense possessions in Connaught and in the Counties 

* Sec Cent. XVI. chap. I. 



348 

of Limerick and Waierford. In 1546 these possesskmi were 
granted to Osborne Itchingham at the annual rent of £3 lOs* 
6d.; while in the 20th of Elizabeth, the lands and rectories 
belonging to this Abbey in the County of Limerick were 
conceded to Robert Callan.* 

The ruins of the Abbey of Donbrody, rising in awfiil 
grandeur just at the conflux of the rivers Suir and Barrow, 
present a truly picturesque and magnificent appearance. — 
These ruins, including the cloister and church, are perhaps 
the most complete and at the same time the most extensive of 
any in the kingdom. At the west-end stood the porch 
adorned with filigree open-work cut in stone, while the im- 
mense Oothic window, which rises above it, displays an 
amazing specimen of curious and splendid architecture. The 
chancel and the walls of the church are entire; within it are 
three chapels, vaulted and groined; while the aisles are sepa-^ 
rated from the nave by a double row of arches, witii a mould- 
ing which reclines on beautiful consoles. The tower also is 
complete, and the arch on which it rests is, for its curious 
and expansive curviture, universally admired. 

The Abbey of Leix, in the Barony of Cullinagh, Queen's 
CJounty, was founded for Cistercians in 1183 by Cnoghor 
O'More. By an inquisition taken under Edward VI, the 
property consisted of three hundred acres of land in the 
town of Abbeyleix and nine hundred acres in various parts 
of the county. In the 6th of Elizabeth this Abbey, with 
parcel of its possessions, was consigned to Thomas, Earl of 
Ormond, at the yearly rent of £6 16s. 8d.t 

The Abbey of Ikislaunaugh (Surium), in the Barony of 
OfTa and IfFa, County of Tipperary, was founded, or as some 
assert, re-founded by Donald O'Brian, King of North Mun-^ 
ster, for Cistercians in 1184. In the 19th of Elizabeth, the 
possessions consisting of one thousand nine hundred acres of 

* Aud. Gen. t Chief Rcmem. 



349 

land^ in the Counties of Tipperary and Waterford^ were 
given to Cormac Mac Carthy at an annual rtnt of £24 
Iriah,* 

The Abbey of Kilcuhin^ in the Barony of Kilnelongurty, 
County of Tipperary, was founded for Benedictines, by 
Philip of Worcester in 1184. It was a cell to the Bene- 
dictine house at Glastonbury and during the reign of Henry 
VIII became a ruin. 

The Abbey of Knocmoy (De Colle Victorise), in the 
Barony of Tiaquin, County of Galway, was founded by 
Cathal O'Conor for Cistercians, in 1190. Hugh O'Kelly, 
the last Abbot, after having acknowledged the supremacy of 
Henry VIII, obtained a grant of it, but enjoyed it only a 
very short time when his career on this earth terminated. — 
The property, situated in the Counties of Calway and Sligo, 
was extensive. In 1620 Valentine Blake held the Abbey 
and a considerable part of the possessions-t 

Gray Abbey (De Jugo Dei), in the Barony of Ardes and 
County of Down, was founded by Africa, wife of John De 
Courcey, for Cistercians, in 1193. This Abbey with sixteen 
carucates of land, parcel of its possessions, was granted to 
Gerald, Earl of Kildare. j: 

The A]QBEy of Athlone, to the west of the Shannon, was 
founded for Cistercians in the 12th century. At the suppres- 
sion it was granted to Sir Richard Bingham.§ 

The Abbey of Corcumroe (De Petra Fertili), in the 
Barony of Burren and County of Clare, was founded for 
Cistercians by Donald O'Brian, King of North Munster, in 
1194. This Abbey with eleven quarters of land was granted 
to Sir Richard Harding.|| 

From this century likewise must be dated the foundation of 
several Commanderies belonging to the Knights Templars 
and Hospitallers in Ii-eland. 

* Aud. Gen. t Lib. laquisit. X Aud. Gen. § King. p. 256. || And. Gen. 



360 

Thb Priory op Kilmaikham^* near Dubliiii was founded 
Huder the uiTOcation of St. John the Baptist, about the year 
1 174, for Knights Templars, by Richard, sumamed Strong* 
bow. A circumstantial account of this establishment and of 
many others shall be reserved for the 16th century .f 

Thb CJokmahdbry of Clontarf, County of Dublin, was 
erected during the reign of Henry II for Knights Templars. 
Sir John Rawson, Prior of Kilmainham, obtained in 1641 
an annual pension paid to him out of the lands of this Com- 
mandery.:{: 

The CTommakdbrt of St. Johk akd St. Brigid, Wexford, 
was founded for Knights Hospitallers, in the 12th century, 
by William Mareechal, Earl of Pembroke. Before the sup- 
pression of the Templars, this was the grand Gnnmandery of 
the Hospitallers in Ireland; a title which was afterwards 
transferred to Kilmainham. The possessions of this Pre- 
ceptory were confiscated in 1640. 

Thb Cohmandbry of Kilsaran, in the Barony of Ardee 
and County of Louth, was erected for Knights Templars by 
Maud De Lacy, in the 12th century. The possessions were 
made oyer to the Crown in 1641. 

Thb Commandbry of Killurb, in the B«u*ony of Gual- 
tiere and County of Waterford, dates its foundatioQ from the 
12th century. In the 26th of Elizabeth it was giunted to 
Nicholas Aylmer. 

Thb Commandert op Kilbarry, in the Barony of Mid- 
dlethird and County of Waterford, was founded about the 
same period for Knights Templars. In the 16th century it 
became numbered among the general confiscations. 

Thb Commandbry of Kilclogan, in the Barony of Shel- 
bume and County of Wexford was founded for Knights 

• It wu anciently called Kill-Magnend. St Magnend having been Abbot 
here in the leventh century. 

t S«j Cent. XVI. chap. IL ^ Ware, Antiq. 



361 

Templars by O'More, in the 12th century. In the 30th of 
Elizabeth this Preceptory was granted to Sir Henry Harring- 
ton at the annual rent of £35 6s. 8d.* 

Ths CoMMANt>ERT OF Ballthack, in the County of Wex* 
ford^ dates its erection from the same period. It was subject 
to that of Kilclogan and became merged in the same confis- 
cation. 

The Commandbrt op Tullt^ in the County of Kildare, 
was founded for Knights Hospitallers in the 12th century • — 
This Preceptory with three hundred acres of land and various 
rectories was conceded to Sir Henry Harrington at the annual 
rent of £21 6s. Sd.f 

Thb Commandbrt of Castle But^ in the Ardeg, County 
of Down, was erected for Knights Hospitallers by Hugh 
be Lacy^ in the 12th century. During the 16th century it 
became a ruin. 

The Commanbert of KiLMAmHAis^BBO^ in the Barony of 
Kells and County of Meath, was founded in the reign of 
Richard I, for Knights Hospitallers^ by Walter De Lacy. — 
In the 33rd of Elizabeth this Commandery was granted to 
Sir Patrick Bamwall at the annual rent of £63 12s. 2d.:t^ 

Many of the establishments founded by Irish princes are 
placed in this catalc^e^ and abundantly prore^ that in Ire- 
land religion had patrons of her own, without seeking for 
the aid of foreigners. A great number of monastic founda- 
tions had, no doubt, been richly endowed by some of the 
English at this period, but the enactments, which in after 
times had been passed and particularly under Edward II, 
rendered it impossible for Irishmen to derive any benefit from 
these establishments. Whatever might have been the 
motives which influenced De Lacy, De Courcey, and other 
leaders, to signalize themselves in this respect, it is certain 
that they were, at the very same time, everywhere enriching 

• See Cent. XVI, cbtp. II. t Aud. Geiij t W. 



352 

themselves with the plunder of Church property. The testi- 
mony of Giraldus Cambrensis on this subject shall conclude 
this chapter. After having stated that Robert Fitz-Stephen, 
Herirey De Monte Morisco and John De Courcey bad not 
deserved to enjoy legitimate offspring, Giraldus adds, ''This 
is not to be wondered at; for the miserable clergy are re* 
duced to beggary in the island. The Cathedral Churches 
mourn, having been robbed by the aforesaid persons and by 
others along with them, of those lands and .ample estates 
which had been formerly granted to them faithfully and de- 
voutly. Thus the exalting of the Church has been changed 
into the despoiling or plundering of the Church.*'* And 
again: ''The greatest disadvantage of all was, that while we 
conferred no advantage on the Church of Christ, in our new 
principality, we not only did not think it worthy of any im- 
portant bounty, or of due honour, but even after having 
taken away its possessions, we have employed ourselves adier 
in mutilating or in abrogating its former dignities and ancient 
privileges, "t 

* Proemium to the second edition of " Hibernia ezpugnata," 
t Hiber. expug. L. 2. chap. XXXV. 



CHAPTER III. 

JUligious and Literary Characters of the Ttoelfth Cenr 
tury — General Observations. 

Since the days of the early Fathers of the Irish Church, 
there has not appeared a greater or a more distinguished sup-- 
porter of religion than 

St. Malacht.* — ^This holy man was of the ^tn^ient and 
noble fiatmily of the 0*Morgairs and was bom at Armagh 
about the year 1095. At a very early age Malachy formed 
the determination of renouncing the world and of conse^ 
crating himself to the service of religion; for iiirhich purpose 
he repaired to Imar, an austere and saintly map, jat that 
time residing in a cell near Armagh. The extraordinary pro* 
gress which he had made in this school of Christian perfec- 
tion soon attracted the notice of Celsus, who was then Pri- 
mate of Ireland. Afalaehy was ordained priest by this Prel- 
ate, although he had not at the time attained the canonical 
agCi and was immediately .after appointed his Vicar with 
full powers for effecting such jreforms in morals and dia*- 
ripline as the Church of Armagh might at that time seem to 
require. With a view to accomplish these important objects 
Majachy commenced by establishing the custom of singing 
the canonical Hours in all the Churches of the diocess, and 
succeeded in substituting the Roman office and liturgy in 
place of the one (Cursus Gallorum) generally used by the 
Irish clergy.f Before this time the usual mode of contract* 



* His original name was Madmaodhog, that is, Servant of Maidoc, or of 
St. Aidan, Bishop of Ferns : this name has heen latinized into Malachy. 

t See Appendix JIJ. 

2t 



354 

ing marriages in Ireland had been by espousal^ or as theo- 
logians express it tponsalia de futttroj and which, attended 
with certain conditions, was as valid as the matrimonial con- 
tract now used ('de prmsenti)/^ This espousal was accom- 
panied by the sacerdotal benediction, and when the time 
specified by the parties had elapsed the marriage became 
ratified and binding, without their having had recourse to the 
contract de prasenti This custom of celebrating^ the mar- 
riage contract was not in those days confined to Ireland; it 
prevailed very generally in other countries until the time of 
the Council of Trent, when it was prohibited as wdl by the 
canons of that general council as by the civil laws of several 
Christian states Neither was that impediment observed at 
this period in Ireland, by which marriage was prohibited 
within the seventh degree of consanguinity or affinity. Con- 
sidering the system of clanship which then prevailed in this 
country and the practice of marrying chiefly within their 
septs, this canonical rule could not, without much incon- 
venience, be adopted here, and in fiict it had, after some 
time, been found so difficult to observe it anywhere, that it 
was soon after deemed necessary to have it modified, by 
limiting the prohibition within the fourth degrte both of con- 
sanguinity and affinity. However, Malachy succeeded in 
introducing these canonical impediments all over the dioeess 
of Armagh; in like manner the marriage contract de prm-- 
senti was, at least in that part of Ireland, now substituted 
instead of the espousal, which had been usually practised in 
preceding times. 

In 11^ the Saint repaired to Lismore, for the purpose of 



* That this practice was observed in Ireland, even so late as A. 1566, is attested 
T;y Good, an English priest. This roan conducted, at that time, a school in Lhn- 
erickt where he was hospitahty received and cherished by the inbafaiuaei ; hot 
these favours he afterwards repaid with low scurrility and base ingratitude. How«- 
ever, on the subject of marriage he says, " Extra oppida raro matrimonia contra- 
hunt, nee de prsstnti, sed de futuro promittunt."— Ap. Camden. 



355 

acquiring a still greater knowledge of the Scriptures and of 
ecclesiastical discipline under the venerable Malchus, then 
Bishop of that See. It has been already stated, that after 
he had been called home from this retreat he was consecrated 
by Celsus and placed over the then vacant See of Connor. — 
This diocess, being contiguous to Armagh, had, it appears, 
suffered more from the scandalous proceedings of the pseudo- 
archbishops than any other, and was, when Malachy had 
been placed over it, in a state of the most deplorable dis- 
order. The ministers of the altar were but few, confessions 
were neglected, neither preaching or the other public duties 
of the Church had been observed; in short, the sacraments 
and all the sacred obligations of religion seemed to have been 
almost universally abandoned. A reformation was, however, 
soon effected: Malachy went amongst them and admonished 
them both publicly and privately; be re-built churches, or- 
dained clergymen, had the word of life announced to the 
faithful, the confessional was attended, the sacraments were 
frequented, and in a very few years he had the consolation of 
seeing around him a people orderly and religious, and in 
every respect an example for the rest of the community.* It 
is generally considered that this is the portion of the Irish 
Church to which St Bernard alludes in his life of St. 
Malachy, and which that venerable writer represents as 
being at the time immerged in a state of actual barbarism. — 
It is evident that he could not have applied the terms gene- 
rally; for in the rest of Ireland religion was enforced and 
practised, while the diffnent sees in each of the provinces 
bad been governed by bishops, who for piety and learning 
ranked foremost amongst the prelates of the Christian Church 
at this period* In 1132, Malachy consented to undertake 
the government of the Arcbdiocess of Armagh* Various 
were the difficulties to which he had been exposed before he 

• S. Bcraard, Vita S. Mai. chap. VI. 



d66 

succeeded ih rescuing this See out of the hands of those 
powerful persons by whom it had been so long usurped. For 
the history of these proceedings together with his retiring to 
the See of DoWn> his journey to Rome and his return as 
legate apostolic to Ireland^ the reader must be referred to the 
detail already given in the first chapter. 

The responsibility arising out of the yarious duties of this 
important and arduous commission had now called forth aH 
the zeal and energy of the Saint. He made a visitation of 
the provinces, correcting some^ encouraging others and in-^ 
structing all. These journies were always performed on foot, 
and although he had been invited and courted by the great, 
he nevertheless preferred to take up bis abode in such of the 
monasteries as were most remarkable for poverty and religious 
discipline. During his sojourn in these retreats, the Saint 
contented himself with the humble hre of the estaUishment 
and performed all the duties of the institute so as to edify 
and encourage every member of the community.* St Ber- 
nard in his circumstantial and beautiful life of St Malachy, 
relates an occurrence which had then taken place at Cork, in 
nearly the following words : About this time the See of Cork 
became vacant^ but the clergy had not yet determined on the 
person whom they should select for promotion to the episco- 
pal chair of that ancient diocess. When the Saint had ar- 
rived in that city, he was consulted on this subject, and the 
appointment to the vacant see was now placed exclusively in 
his hands. Malachy, however, thought not of selecting any 
one of the nobles or of the rich and powerful, all these he 
passed over, while, in the presence of the clergy and people, 
he presently named a man both poor and humble and a 
stranger in that part of the country but with whose merits he 
had been already acquainted. Messengers having been im- 
mediately despatched, it was soon discovered that this per- 

• S. Bcrnwd, Vita, chap. XIL 



357 

son had been confined to his bed and was in so weak a con- 
dition that he could not possibly appear before them unless 
he had been carried out by others. ''Let him arise in the 
name of the Lord/' observed the Saint^ ''I command him: 
by his obedience shall he be restored to health.'^ The hum- 
ble individual, deeming himself unworthy to be exalted to 
such a station, yet willing to obey the order of the Saint, 
made an effort to arise from his bed, when at once be found 
his strength returning and was able to walk to the church 
with facility and firmness. Having appeared before the as- 
sembly, he was placed in the episcopal chair amidst the con- 
gratulations of both clei^ and people and was soon after 
consecrated Bishop of Cork.* It is generally supposed that 
this pious Bishop was Gilla Aeda O'Mugin, who had been 
about this time Abbot of St. Finbar's and from whom 
that ancient foundation had derived the name of Gill 
Abbey. This opinion is strongly confirmed by the fact, that 
the Abbey of Finbar had been re-built in this century for 
strangers from Connaught, the country of St. Finbar himself, 
and it is moreover certain that the newly elected prelate was 
a native of that Province; a circumstance explanatory of 
and corresponding with the term stranger so distinctly 
marked in the text of St. Bernard. While Malachy had 
been stationed at Down, his brother, Christian (Gilla^Criost), 
Bishop of Clogher, died: this saintly and learned Prelate is 
also greatly extolled by St. Bernard, and most honourable 
mention has been made of him in almost all our annals. 

After the Synod of Holmpatrick, in 1148, Malachy pro^ 
ceeded on his second journey to Rome, for the purpose of 
obtaining the palliums: however, when he had reached 
Glairvaux, he was seized with a fever after having celebrated 
mass on the festival of St. Luke. St. Bernard and his com- 
munity were greatly afiected, and when the brethren^ who 

• S. Bernard, Vita, chap. XIII. 



358 

had accompanied Malachy from Ireland, encouraged him and 
prayed that he might not be taken from themi he obaenred: 
<< Malachy mnit die this year, behold the day ii approaching, 
which, as you wdl know, I always wished should be my 
last." In fact the Saint had often expressed a desire of 
terminating his mortal career id the Monastery of Clairvaux, 
and hence it was, that in his former interview with the Pope, 
lie earnestly implored that he might be permitted to resign 
his Bishopric in Ireland; a request which could not at th%t 
time be granted. On finding the last night of his life apr 
proaching, he addressed the brethren with the greatest pos- 
sible cheerfulness, and having received the last sacraments 
the Saint raised his eyes to heaven and said; '^O Gk>d ! (Mre- 
serve them in thy name, and not only these but likewise all 
those, who through my ministry have bound themselves tp 
thy service." Then, to use the words of St Bernard, 
placing his hands on the head of each and blessing them all, 
he desired them to go to rest, whereas his hour was not yet 
come. About midnight the whole community assembled, 
and several abbots were in attendance with St, Bernard and 
the brethren to watch his exit Shortly after he expired, in 
the 64th year of his age, on the 2nd of November, A.D* 
1148, in the place and at the time which he had long ardently 
desired. . His death resembled sleep: so placid and cheerful 
was his countenance. When the body was conv^ed to the 
church, St. Bernard observed a boy one of whose arms had 
been withered; he called him forth and desired him to apply 
the arm to the hand of St. Malachy; the boy obeyed and 
was instantly cured. St. Bernard preached the funenU 
oration: in the life already mentioned he has given an au- 
thentic account of a number of miracles which had been 
wrought by means of our Saint, both during his life and 
after his death. St Malachy was canonized by Pope Cle- 
ment III, A.D. 1192.* 

• Mabilloo, Chron. Bernard, Col. 10. 



359 

Sl Laursncb OToole (Lorcan OTuathal*) was of the 
illustriona house of the O'Tooles, Princes of Imaly, in the 
now County of Wicklow. When Laurence had been about 
ten years of age, he was given as a hostage by his father to 
Dermod Mac-Morogh, then King of Leinster. This wicked 
Prinee treated Laurence with great cruelty ; however he was 
soon after restored to his parents and committed by them to 
the care of the yenerable Bishop of Glendaloch^ for the pur- 
pose of being instructed in learning and piety. Laurence 
continued under the guidance of this good Prelate and made 
such progress in religious acquirements that, at the age of 
twettty*fivei he was elected Abbot of the Monastery of Olen^ 
daloch, which, it must be remarked, had at that time been 
distinct from the Bishopric. The wealth of this Abbey, 
being then very considerable, was employed by Laurence in 
relieving the poor, and particularly during the famine which 
had, at that period, raged throughout all this district Some 
years after, on the death of the Bishop of Olendaloch, Lau*^ 
rence was unanimously chosen his successor; this dignity, 
he however declined, alledging that he had not yet attained 
the age required by the canons. Harris, in treating on this 
occurrence says: ''He declined the See, because he could 
not have the opportunities of exerting his strong dispositicm 
to charity, when Bishop of Olendaloch^ as he had when 
Abbot; the revenues of the Bishopric being much inferior to 
those of the Abbey." 

Upon the death of Gr^ory, Archbishop of Dublin, in 
1161, Laurence was chosen by the electors of that Diocess, 
but persisted for a long time in refusing to comply with their 
entreaties. He was, however, at length prevailed upon to 
submit and was accordingly consecrated in Christ Church, 
Dublin, by Gelasius the Primate, accompanied by jtmny 
bishops and a great number of the clergy.f The ardent 

* Four Masun ap Tr. Th. p. 309. Lorcan hai been latinized into Lamtmiviu 
t Vita S. Laurent, ehap. X. 



360 

attachment^ which he had always evinced for regular dis- 
cipline, could not even in his present situation be dispensed 
with. Accordingly on his accession to the See,' Laurence in* 
duced the canons of Christ Churchy who had been at the 
time secular canons,* to become canons regular of the congre* 
gation of Aroasia. To the observance of all the rules ap* 
pertaining to this institute Laurence had most strictly at^ 
tended; he wore the habit, beneath which he always used a 
hair shirt, observed silence at the stated hours, attended 
along with his canons at the midnight office and practised 
various austerities which were not in any manner enjoined by 
the rule. His charity to the poor was unbounded ; amongst 
whom he took care to have the greatest portion of the re* 
venues of his Church distributed. In 1167, Laurence at- 
tended the great convention of the clergy and princes of 
Lethcuin, or the northern half of Ireland, when Roderic 
O'Conor was recognized as Monarch and several enactments 
were passed relative to the political state of the country. 

At this eventful crisis, Laurence had been providentially 
raised up for the succour of his afflicted countrymen. He 
had presided scarcely nine years over the Archiepiscopal See 
when Strongbow arrived with his army under the walls of 
Dublin. The siege was obstinate and dreadful, but at length 
the city was taken by storm. Amidst the indiscriminate 
slaughter which ensued the good Bishop exposed himself in 
all directions for the safety of his flock, and by his interference 
several of the churches had been secured from pilli^e and 
sacrilege. During this and the following year (1171), the 
excessive cruelties perpetrated by the followers of Strongbow, 

* These canona had heen, in all probability, that description of ecclesiastics 
known in this age by the name of Culdees or Colidei, that is, persons living in com- 
mnnky; CmIU, in Irish, meaning together trnd Dm, a man. The Culdaes were 
secular clergymen ; they lived in community and were bound to the observance of 
certain rules. In many countries they formed the canons of cathedral churches, 
particularly in France and in Scotland ; in which latter kingdom they became a 
BumefOHS and an influential body. 



361 

Raymund le Grose and others^ had enkindled the indignation 
of every good and virtuous man. Laurence could no longer 
continue an inattentive observer of these atrocities; he there- 
fore encouraged Roderic O'Conor and other princes to unite 
for the total expulsion of the invadersi and applied also for 
assistance to Oodred^ King of Mann. Roderic accordingly 
appeared with a powerful army before Dublin, while at the 
same time the harbour was blockaded by a fleet of thirty 
ships sent by Godred. The siege continued for nearly two 
months, during which time Strongbow and his forces hftd 
been reduced to such distress that they seemed willing to 
capitulate. By the consent of the Irish princes, Laurence 
was the person appointed for arranging the terms; accord-^ 
ingly in the name of the Irish nation, he announced to 
Strongbow and to his adherents, that they should surrender 
all the places which they had then occupied and depart the 
kingdom on a certain determined day.* These terms, as 
might be expected, were far from being agreeable, while, in 
the meantime, the Irish too confident of success carried on 
the siege with great negligence. Thus circumstanced, Strong-^ 
bow resolved on making a desperate effort. At a moment 
when the besiegers were off their guard he made a sudden 
and a vigorous sally from the gates with a chosen body of 
knights and infantry; the Irish army having been thus taken 
unawares were dispersed and routed, while Roderic, who w^as 
at the time bathing in the Liffey, had with great difficulty 
effected his escape. From this period the English saw the 
necessity of acting at least with more policy towards the 
people of Dublin. 

While Strongbow, by an unexpected turn of fortune, had 
thus compelled the Irish troops to raise the siege of Dublin^ 
his associates were, in some places, far from being similarly 
successful. The Castle of Ferry-Carig, a strong fortress 

* Leland, B. 1. chap. II 

2z 



362 

situated near the town of Wexford, had been for some time 
in the possession of Fitz-Stephen. This fortress, from its 
natural position/ had been considered impregnable; it wa» 
moreover strongly garrisoned, but from some mismaoage- 
ment of the governor, its supply of provisions was too limited 
to meet the ex^eneies of a tedious si^e. The Danes of 
Wexford, encouraged by the distress to which Strongbow 
was reduced, had now come to the resolution of storming 
the castle and in this enterprise they were assisted by Donald, 
an illegitimate son of Dermod Mac-Morogh. In the mean* 
time a report was industriously circulated that Strongbow 
had been compelled to capitulate and that Dublin was in the 
hands of Roderic O'Connor.* Fitz-Stephen, perceiving that 
the rumour of this disaaterous occurrence had made its way 
into the garrison, and believing it to be a &ct, immediately 
surrendered the castle, which was accordmgly occupied by 
the besiegers without striking a blow.f 

The following year (1172) Laurence, assisted by Strong- 
bow, Fitz-Stephen and Raymund, enlarged Christ Church 
and built the choir and belfry, annexing also three new 
chapels to the Cathedral. Laurence with other prelates set 

•Ware, Annak^at A. 1171. 

t The snnender of this Castle has given rise to a piece of borefoced calumiiy 
invented by Giraldus Cambrensis, and afterwaids retaUed by some of his interested 
imitators. According to this story, Joseph O'Hethe, Bishop of Ferns, and Malachy 
O'fiyrne, Bishop of Kildare, came to the fortress and took an oath in the presence 
of the Governor that Dublin had been stormed by Roderic O'Conor, and that 
Strongbow and his forces had been cut to pieces— Thus, say they, by perjury and 
stratagem was Fitz-Stephen prevailed upon to accept the terms of the besiegers and 
snriendcr the castle. The reader must remark, that the only antfaorily oo which 
this sUtement rests, is that of Giraldus Cambrensis; (Hib.expug. LLC. xxv.) 
an authority upon which, as to events of this description, no intelligent man could 
set the least value. Hence it is that Ware, whose judgment cannot be questioned, 
has passed it by as unworthy of notice : The iact is, Giraldhs was ashamed of the 
cowardly manner in which the garrison had' surrendered; he accordingly invented 
this story for the purpose of removing the disgrace which (as he had reason to 
suppose) might otherwise attach to the character of bis friend Fitz-Stephen and 
of hi^ countrymen. 



363 

out for Rome, in order to attend at the Council of Lateran, 
and shortly after returned to Ireland as legate apostolic for 
that country: these events together with the moral reforma- 
tion which he had made in Dublin have been already noticed 
in the first chapter. -< 

In the year 1180 Laurence undertook a second jotimey to 
England, for the purpose of settling some afiairs between 
Roderic 0*Conor and the English Monarch. On this oc- 
casion Henry acted the part of a cruel and an undisguised 
tyrant ; he not only refused to come upon any terms of ac- 
commodation, but had even given orders that Laurence 
should not be allowed to return to Ireland. Thus deprived 
of liberty, the Saint retired to the Monastery of Abingdon, 
where he continued to reside for three weeks. In the mean- 
time Henry went over to Normandy, while Laurence was 
still anxious to effect a reconciliation between him ahd 
Roderic O'Conor. The Saint, accordingly, set out for France, 
but when he had reached the frontiers of Normandy, he was 
seized with a fever and was obliged to take up his abode in 
the Monastery of Augam (now Eo) belonging to the Canons 
Regular of St. Victor.* Foreseeing that his end was ap- 
proaching, he made his confession and received the hely 
Viaticum. Having been admonished by some of the breth- 
ren to make a will, he answered: '^God knows that I have 
not, at present, as much money as one penny under the sun.'' 
The holy exile reflected virith sorrow on the calamities of his 
native country, and shortly before his death, he lamented 
its sad and fallen state, saying, in the Irish language: ''Ah! 
foolish and senseless people! what are you now to do? who 
will alleviate your misfortunes? who will relieve you?" Soon 
after he expired on the 14th of November, A.D. 1180, and 
was interred in the Church of Augum; the funeral obsequies 
having been attended by great numbers, among whom was 

* Vita, S. Laurent, chap. XIX. 



364 

th9 Pope's Legate, C&rdinal Alexius. St. Lauraice was 
canonized by Honorius III, in the year 1226. Some of his 
reliques were sent to CbriBt Church, Dublin, and some to 
various places in France.* 

Marian O'Gorman, the celebrated hagiologist, flourished 
about the middle of the twelfth century. Marian was a 
Canon Regular of St« Augustin and in 1172 was constituted 
Prior of the celebrated estabUshment of Knock, near Louth. 
He has written ih Irish verse a Martyrology, comprizing not 
only Irbh saints, but also those of other countries. This 
work has been greatly admired, both for its accumcy and 
the elegance of its diction; a great portion of it, however, 
has been extracted from the ancient Martyrology, usually 
called that of Aengus. There appears a diversity of opinion 
with respect to the date of its publication. Colgan, after 
passing some handsome encomiums on this Martyrology, is 
of opinion that it had been composed during the incumbency 
of Gelasius, Archbishop of Armagh, in 1167; Ware marks 
its publication at 1171: it is evident, however, from the 
names of certain saints inserted therein, that it must have 
been published some time after the year 1174. Marian con- 
tinued at the Priory of Knock which he adorned by his vir- 
tues as well as his learning. He died A.D. llSl.f 

Congan, a Cistercian and Abbot of Inislaunaugh (Surium) 
flourished in 1140. This eminent man became in the twelfth 
century the reviver of monastic discipline in the south, and 
for his learning and exalted virtues obtained a very high 
rank among his contemporaries. The opinion, which St. 
Bernard had entertained of Congan's talents and acquire- 
ments, was very great, and with his assistance, in collecting 
materials, that holy writer had been enabled to compile his 
comprehensive and much esteemed life of St. Malachy. — 
Among other matters, St. Bernard, in the preface to that 

• Vito, S. Laurent. HovcUen. f A. A. S. S. p. 737, 



3C6 

work, obsen'es: ^^lu compliance with your commands, my 
reverend brother and sweet friend. Abbot Oongan, and in 
obedi^oe to the wishea of the whole Church of Ireland, re« 
questing, as appears from your letter, a plain history without 
the embellJshmentB of eloquence, I will undertake it and en* 
deavonr to be clear and instructive yet not tedious. I am 
satisfied as to the truth of the narrative, having received my 
mfiKmation from yo^, wh<»n I cannot suspect to relate any- 
thing of which you had not certain knowledge." Hence it 
appears that the materials for the work had been furnished 
by Congan^ and consequently the scandalous abuses allud^ 
to by SL Bernard must have been those which occurred in 
particular districts of Ulster; the congregations in the south 
and especially in Congan's locality having be^i at that period 
both orderly and edifying. Congan has Ulso published the 
Acts of St Bernard and several Epistles addressed to that 
Saint* He died about the year 1 162. 

It is impossible to contemplate the historical events of the 
twelfth century without awakening, at least, some of those 
sympathies which our common nature has settled for repose 
in the human heart Considering the number of eminent 
prelates by whom the Irish Church had been then golrenied 
and the many national synods which had been held even 
down to the Council of Kells in 1152, it may with great truth 
be 9aid» that in the Christian world it would, at that period, 
be difficult to find any one national Chnrcb, in which morality 
and discipline had been more zealously inculcated than in 
the Church of Ireland^ At the very opening of the century, 
we find a legate apostolic in Ireland, and this important 
office had been confided not to a foreign ecclesiastic but to a 
native prelate, Gillebert, Bishop of Limerick. In this com- 
mission Gillebert was succeeded by St Malachy and by the 
learned Christian, Bishop of Lismore; and so high did the 

• Ware*8 Writers. 



366 

character of the Church of Ireland rank at this time, that 
the nuDiber of the archiepiscopal sees was increased and 
Cardinal Paparo is despatched by Pope Eogene III with four 
paUiums, which in the national Council of Kells he distri- 
buted to the four archbishops of Ireland. Strange, howerer, 
and indeed almost incredible is the fact, that this Church, 
so highly honoured, so pre-eminently supported, was in a few 
years after, together with the whole Irish nation, surrendered 
into the hands of a stranger. It is moreover remarkable, 
that at this very period the Church of Ireland had been 
gQYemed by prelates of no ordinary character: by Gehisias 
its Primate, by St. Laurence O'Toole, Christian Bishop of 
Lismore and legate apostolic, Catholicus of Tuam ; men whose 
superiors in piety and learning it would be difficult to find in 
any other national Church at this age. It is self-evident, 
that Alexander III must have been grossly imposed upon by 
the enemies of Ireland; at all events Henry II had scarcely 
received the Bull and the Brief into his possession,' when he 
began to exhibit splendid proofs of his superior qualifications 
as a Church reformer, by encroaching on the ecclesiastical 
property of England and by being, at length, implicated in 
the cold-blooded murder of St. Thomas (Becket) Archbishc^ 
of Canterbury. 

The regulations ordained in the Synod of Cashel, amount- 
iag to eight, have been already noticed; but in vain do we 
look among them for any one single decree or even an ex- 
pression, indicating that the Irish Church had been then con- 
sidered by the prelates assembled, to be either in a rude or a 
disordered state. Among these decrees, however, the third, 
fourth and fifth are worthy of notice; they serve to mark out 
in the clearest light, the ingenious, artful policy of the Eng- 
lish Monarch. Henry's grand aim was, to conciliate the 
clergy and by all means to bring them over to his interest. — 
Accordingly, by the fourth and fifth decrees of the Synod of 
Cashel, the possessions of the Church are declared free from 



367 

femporal exactions^ and the clergy are exempted from what 
was termed Eric. While the third decree by which "the 
faithfiil were to pay tithea, was inimitable and formed the 
climax. But what necessity for recurring to the decrees of 
the Synod of Cashel, as specimens of Henry's great solici- 
tude for Church reformation? Was he reforming the Church 
when he banished St. Laurence OToole from his diocess and 
his country? Was he refcnrming the Church when he al- 
lowed De Courcey, Fitz- Stephen and others to pollute and 
plunder the sanctuaries of Ireland from one extremity of the 
country to the other? These are facts^ and they might, did 
space permit, be supported by numberless others, deduced 
as well from the ecclesiastical as the civil history of those 
melancholy times. 

It has been asserted by some writers that Ireland had been 
brought under subjection to England by means of the Bull 
of Adrian IV, and by the influence of the prelates assembled 
at Cashel. This, however, is an erroneous opinion; for, as 
we have seen, Mac Carthy of Desmond and O'Brian of 
Thomond did surrender and deliver up the keys of their re- 
spective capitols, Cork and Limerick, to Henry II, shortly 
after his landing; while their example was immediately fol- 
lowed by Fitz-Patrick, O'Ruarc and other petty princes. — 
The &ct is, neither the Bull of Adrian or the Brief of Alex- 
ander was read or produced at the Council of Cashel, al- 
though Henry had both these documents in his possession 
for years previously. That Prince had too much policy to 
do an act of such imprudence. The whole tenor of them 
and even the very expressions employed, particularly in the 
Brief, would have only served to irritate the feelings of both 
the prelates and the other ecclesiastics who had attended 
that Synod. The subjection of Ireland, therefore, cannot 
be attributed to these documents, nor to the influence of the 
clergy. The real cause, the self-evident and only cause of 
this event was the jealousy and the consequent dissensions 



368 

which, at that time, subsisted behveen the princes of Ireland 
themselves. Henry undeftook ''to reform the rude and dis- 
ordered Church," but his vassals, Stiongbow, De Courcey 
and the other invaders found out a way of their own for re- 
forming ''the barbarous people of Irdand" by robbing them 
of their property, by defiling their houses, profaning their 
sanctuaries and covering the whole face of the country with 
blood. These and similar topics, however, come more im- 
mediately within the scope of civil history. The Church of 
Ireland has had also her share in these sufferings and has 
passed through an ordeal of trials and persecutions, such as 
caiuiot be found in the annals of any odier nation. These 
and other eedesiastical events the history of subsequent 
centuries shall clearly and faithfoUy elucidate. 



THIRTEENTH CENTURY. 

CHAPTER I. 

JEvenis cwmecUd with the admiMi$tratwH of ArchbUkop 
Comin — Fautulatian of tie Churekes of St. Amdeon and 
St. Werbwf — PromotionofUngliik Ecclesiastics— Henry 
JDe Loundresy ArcAhishop of Dublin and Lard Justice of 
Ireland— Union of the Sees of DubHn and Olendaloch— 
CMsgiate Church of St. Patrick erected into a Cathedral 
—Baneful effects of the Tithe System—David^ Bishop of 
Waterford, slain — Contention between the Dean and 
Chapter of St. PatrieVs and the Prior and Canons of 
Christ Church— Stephen De Fulbum, Bishop of Water- 
ford and Lord Justice of Ireland — Endeavours to obtain 
the benefit of the English Laws for the Irish Nation- 
Contributions raised by the Irish Church during the Pon- 
tificates of Innocent III and Gregory IX. 

John Comin was the first Englishman who had been pro- 
moted to an episcopal see in Ireland. When the government 
of the Archiepiscopal Diooess of Dublin had, by means of 
Henry 11, been placed in the bands of this Prelate, there 
were reasonable grounds for presuming, that the rights of 
that See would have been respected and its temporalities 
secured (rcmi*the rapacity of those who had already made 
themselves notorious among the now domineering English ad- 
venturers. These expectations were, however, far from being 
realized; scarcely had Hamo De Valoniis been appointed 
Justiciary of Ireland when the work of plunder commmenced."*^ 

• novcdcn> ^, 39— Tirrcl, voK II. p. 66'>. 

3a 



370 

This needy and insatiable governor had, in the very outset of 
his administration^ cast a longing eye on the rich ecclesias- 
tical property attached to the See of Dublin. In defiance of 
religion and of all laW| the Governor Hamo seized upon con« 
siderable portions of land lying in the direction of Swords 
and Finglass, assigning no other reason than his own supreme 
will and that the embarrassed state, to which the English 
Government was then reduced, had rendered such a step in- 
dispensible. Against this injustice Archbishop Comin re- 
monstrated, but without effect; one act of oppression was 
followed by another, until the Archbishop was at length 
obliged to have the vestments, chalices and sacred furniture 
removed from the Cathedral and caused the crucifixes in the 
Church to be covered with thorns and laid prostrate in the 
sanctuary.* The Justiciary, however, was not to be controlled 
in his sacrilegious career; while the Archbishop, after having 
publicly excommunicated Hamo and all those who had along 
with him been concerned in the plunder of the Church, put 
the whole Diocess under an interdict and repaired to Eng- 
land for the purpose of laying his complaints before the 
King. In such a court the influence of the Governor was 
sure to be successful, and the Archbishop, after a delay of 
some months, returned to Ireland without obtaining redress. 
While these acts of oppression, thus suffered with im^ 
punity, had served only to give a keener edge to the avarice 
of Hamo De Valoniis, a new opportunity of adding to his 
wealth presented itself soon after in another quarter. The 
See of Leighlin having become vacant, the Chapter elected 
John, a Cistercian monk, and Abbot of the Monastery of 
Monasterevan, which election was confirmed by Matthew 
O'Heney, Archbishop of Cashel and at that time legate apos- 
tolic for Ireland. The Justiciary, however, interfered and 
opposed the consecration of John; in the meantime taking 

♦ HoVedcn^Ware Annak. p. 36. 



371 

into his own possession not only the temporalities of the 
Church of Leigblin but even the property of the canons 
themselves. In this violent state of affairs^ John was re- 
commended by the Legate to proceed without delay to Rome 
and submit to Pope Innocent III a full and fiur report of 
these unwarrantable proceedings. John accordingly set out 
from Ireland^ having been furnished with letters from the 
Chapter, from the Archbishops of Armagh and Cashed and 
from the Bishops of Kildare, Ferns and Ossory. His re- 
ception in Rome was most flattering. The Pope himself con- 
secrated him Bishop of Leigblin and on his departure gave 
him a letter directed to the Chapter, clei^y and people of 
that Diocessy in which he tells them, that having ordained 
John their Bishop, he now sends him back to his See and 
orders them to obey him. The repeated acts of sacrilege and 
plunder, which have been already stated, drew from Inno^ 
cent III a strong and a severe letter addressed on this oc- 
casion to John of England. In this letter his Holiness re- 
monstrates in the language of firmness and reproof on the 
outrageous conduct of the Justiciary and requires that the 
property taken from the Church and Canons of Leigblin 
should be instantly restored.* Hamo De Valoniis was soon 
after recalled, having first enriched himself by the plunder 
and ruin of private families, but much more by his unheard-* 
of and repeated invasions on the property of the Church. 

Nothing can so clearly depict the spirit of the adventurers, 
at this period, as the eager avidity with which they had en- 
deavoured to get themselves promoted to the most amply en-^ 
dowed sees, according as any of them should happen to be- 
come vacant. Upon the death of Thomas 0*Conor, Arch- 
bishop of Armagh in 1201, no less than three Englishmen 
appeared as candidates; every one of whom pretended to 
have been duly elected. Simon Rochford, Bishop of Meath 

♦ Epist. 361. Edid. Balluawii. 



372 

and Ralph le Petit, Archdeacon of the same Diooess, main- 
tained that they had been canonically elected by the Chapter; 
while the third candidate Humphry De Tichnll retted his 
claim on the appointment and ganetion of King John.^-* 
During this contest, which had been conducted with much 
warmth, they appeared to have set little value <m the humble 
preteiisions of Eugene, an Irish ecclesiastic, and who was in 
reaUty the person regularly and validly elected. There being 
but little chance of having the controversy satisfactorily 
settled at home, and particularly as the King himself had so 
prominently interfered in the business, the whole proceedings 
were, of course, referred to the holy See. This hitherto ap- 
fiaiently difficult and contested case, having been now sub- 
mitted to an unprejudiced tribunal, was almost instantly de- 
cided and Eugene was declared by Pope Innocent III to be 
the person canonically elected. He was accordingly conse- 
erated Archbishop of Amu^h, while directi<ms were given ta 
have the possession of the temporalities forthwith placed in 
his hands. This decision tended only to irritate still more 
the naturally violent disposition of the English Monarch, 
and in a moment of excitement he causes letters patent to be 
addressed to all the suffragan bishops of Armagh, command- 
ing them under pain of his displeasure to shew no kind of 
obedience to the newly consecrated Metropolitan.* Nor was 
John's anger in the least abated on the death of Tichull, his 
favourite candidate, an event which took place soon after; 
he still persisted in his opposition to the Primate and pro- 
ceeded so far as to confirm the election of Ralph, Archdeacon 
of Meath. These unwarrantable proceedings, in which all 
order and discipline had been set at defiance, must have led 
to the worst consequences, had not the King been obliged to 
embark for France, where his dominions were invaded and 
his sovereignty in that country reduced by his rival Philip to 

• Pryii. vol. 11. p. 240. 



373 

the very brink of ruin. While John had been in this hum- 
bled state, a reconciliation was happily effected between him 
and the Primate Eugene, and the See of Armagh was once 
more permitted to enjoy some share of repose. Eugene con- 
tinued to govern the Primatial See until his death in 1216. — 
He died at Rome, the year after the termination of the fourth 
Council of Lateran, at which he attended; but his memory 
•has been honourably recorded in the Annals of St Mary's 
Abbey, near Dublin, in which, agreeably to the concise 
language of the annalist, he is styled '^a man of singular 
honesty and of a holy life." 

Although these English ecclesiastics, who had thus early 
aspired to the Primacy of Armagh, had on this occasion met 
with disappointment, the same must not be said with re- 
ference to other sees. The reader may form some idea of the 
readiness with which they had been patronized, from the fact, 
ihat scarcely had the first five years of this century passed 
over, when there appears not less than eight of the ancient 
and most respectable sees of Ireland placed under the ad- 
ministration of English prelates. Following the order of 
chronology assigned to each respective consecration, these 
Sees are : Dublin, Connor, Meath, Ossory, Leighlin, Down, 
Waterford and Cork.* Nor must it b«j forgotten, that even 
in the very opening of this century, the priors and abbots of 
almost all the great monasteries throughout the kingdom 
were unezceptionabiy Englishmen. 

It is, however, but just and proper to admit, that many 
of the prelates already alluded to had been learned and 
worthy men, and by their zeal and activity contributed much 
to advance the interest of religion in their respective sees. — 



* The names of the prelates consecrated for the above Sees are : John Comin 
coDfleciated Archbfehop of Dublin 1 182. Reginald, consecrated for Connor 1 16^ 
Simon Rochfoxd, for Meath 1194. Hugh Kufus, for Ossory U02. Herlewin, 
for Leighlin 1102. Ralph, for Down, 1202. David, for Waterford 1*204 and 
Reynald for Cork 1205.— Ware Bishops.— Wilktns, vol. II. 



374 

Among these prelates, may, with great propriety, be noticed 
the Bishop of Meath, Simon Rochford (De nipe forti), who 
had been advanced to that See (then termed Clonard) and 
consecrated in 1194. Simon Rochford soon after his pro- 
motion founded a Priory of Regular Canons of the order of 
St. Augustin at Newtown near Trim and erected the church 
of this Priory into a cathedral, which he dedicated in honour 
of Sts. Peter and Paul.*' He then removed the See from 
Clonard, in which the former cathedral stood, to Newtown, 
and from that period this ancient and extensive diocess was 
invariably known by the name of the Diocess of Meath. 

Hugh Rufus, who was consecrated Bishop of Ossory in 
1202, has been mentioned with great respect by all the Irish 
annalists. He was an English Augustinian Canon and the 
first Prior of the Abbey of Kells, in the County of Kilkenny. 
During the incumbency of this Prelate, which includes a 
period of sixteen years, several parochial churches had been 
erected throughout the Diocess of Ossory: among these it 
may be proper to notice the parish Churches of Oowran, 
Rathdowney, Castlecomer, Callan, Bumchurch, Dunmore 
and Lisdowney.f By means of this decidedly useful TreU 
ate, were likewise founded the Priory of Canons Regular at 
Inisteague and the beautiful Abbey of St. John in the City 
of Kilkenny. 

Herlewin, an English Cistercian and Bishop of Leighlin, 
had also been a distinguished promoter of learning and re- 
ligion. He was a great benefactor to the celebrated Abbey 
of Dunbrothy in the County of Wexford; a considerable 
part of which he built, having first endowed it with large 
revenues for the poor, and in the Church of which he was 
interred, A.D. 1216. 

But the most efiicient and eminent Prelate in those times 
was John Comin, Archbishop of Dublin. Notwithstanding 

* Ware Bishops, at Meatli. t Chart. MS. 



376 

the infamous conduct of the Justiciary Hamo^ and the an- 
noyance to which this good Prelate must have been for so 
long a time subjected, his exertions in promoting the welfare 
of (he citizens of Dublin as well as the interest of his See 
continued unabated. At length, however, Hamo de Valoniis 
was recalled and in compensation for the injuries he had done 
to the See of Dublin> he made a grant of twenty plough-lands 
to the Archbishop and to his successors** 

Besides the collegiate Church of St. Patrick, which the 
Archbishop himself had caused to be erected,t several new 
parish churches had about this time been founded in the City 
of Dublin. St. Audeon's was built by the Normans at the 
close of the reign of Henry II, and was dedicated by them 
to St. Audoenus (Owen), Archbishop of Rouen in Normandy. 
The parish Church of St. Werburg seems to have been erected 
at a period somewhat later, but however in the commence- 
ment of the reign of King John and during the incumbency 
of Archbishop Comin. At that time, the City of Dublin 
with the adjacent territory was visited by a dreadful pestilence, 
in which vast multitudes of the inhabitants had been swept 
off, so that Dublin presented the appearance rather of a town 
in ruins and deserted by its inhabitants than a city noted for 
trade and the metropolis of a kingdom. On this occasion it 
was that the English Monarch, John, had brought over two 
colonies from Chester and Bristol and caused them to be 
placed in Dublin and in some of the neighbouring villages. 
These English colonists soon began to make improvements in 
the City, and, among other buildings, had taken care that a 
new church should be erected on the site of a capella, most 
probably that of St. Martin. This Church they dedicated to 
St. Werbui^, Virgin and Patroness of the City of Chester. 

In repairing and beautifying the Cathedral of the Holy 
Trinity (now called Christ Church) Archbishop Comin had 

* Allen's Regist. Fol. d41.^Crede mihi, M.S, Fol. 94. t Sec Cent. zii. c. 2. 



376 

spared no pains. He rebuilt and eulaiged the choir and aug- 
mented the number of its Canons. The Nunnery of Oraee- 
DieUy about three miles north-west of Swords, was founded 
by him; in which he placed Reg^ular Canonesses, following 
the rule of St Augustin. He died on the 28th of October, 
A« D. 1212, and was buried in Christ Church, on the south 
side of the choir. Archbishop Comin was a laboHous and an 
useful Prelate, and in the goyermnent of his diocess appears 
to have been actuated by the purest principles of justice tem- 
pered with clemency and a warm attachment for the real in^ 
terest of Ireland. To the friendly intercourse which had sub- 
sisted between him and the native clergy and to his growing 
affection for the Irish people may be traced that ungenerous 
and shameless neglect, which he experienced at the hands 
both of Henry II and of his son, John. These suflerings, 
however, the Archbishop endured with exemplary fortitude, 
while by his works of piety and of national benefit, he haft 
left behind him living materials and a name by no means un^ 
worthy the successor of the great St. Laursnce OToole* 

At the close of the same year, Henry, usually styled ''De 
Loundres,'' Archdeacon of Stafford was chosen and conse*- 
crated Archbbhop of Dublin. The tyranny and repeated 
excesses of John, King of En^and, had by this time col* 
lected around him such a train of misfortunes both from do- 
mestic and foreign opponents, that prudence, if not necessity, 
obliged him to reckon at least on one friendly and confidential 
adviser in the person of the Archbishop of Dublin. He 
therefore expressed every mark of sincere satis&ction on the 
promotion of the new Archbishop, Henry De Loundres, and 
the very next year on the 23rd of July, appointed him justi- 
ciary or Lord Justice of Ireland.* That a Christian Prelate, 
engaged in the weighty obligations of his ministry, should 
thus permit himself to be encumbered with the toil and diffi- 

* Hoveden.— War«*d Annaltf, ad A. 1213, 



377 

cultieg of civil authority, is a question, the propriety of whi^h 
cannot be easily established* There is, however, one ground 
of justification in the case of Henry, Archbishop of Dublin. 
Almost every man, who had, up to this period, been entrusted 
with the government of Ireland, seems to have lost sight of 
all those qualities which form so essential an ingredient in the 
virtues of justice and hiimanity ; each endeavoured to outstrip 
his predecessor in acts of the most wanton oppression. Tak- 
ing tb«i these circumstances with others arising from the 
character of the King himself into account, the acceptance of 
such an office might perhaps appear even agreeable, if not to 
the wishes of the Archbishop, at least to those of the people 
of Ireland over whom he had been authorized to administer 
justice. At all events Henry had but litUe time and few 
opportunities allowed him for the exercise of the power witli 
which he had been invested, when summonses were issued by 
Innocent III to the Prelates of the Christian world, requiring 
their attendance at the general council which was to have 
been held on the following year, 1215, in the Church of St. 
John Lateran in Ronie, and generally known by the name of 
the fourth Lateran Council. On the part of the Irish Church, 
there attended at this Council; the Primate Eugene — Henry, 
Archbishop of Dublin — Donatus O'Lonergan, Archbishop of 
Cashel, and Cornelius O'Heney, Bishop of Killaloe.* 

On the following year, Henry received from Pope Innocent 
a confirmation of the Bull of Julius III, regarding the prima- 
tial rights, which had been already gmnted to his predecessor 
John Comin. This Bull, together with its amplification by 
Honorius III, contained, among other matters, the following 
remarkable clause-f "Prohibiting moreover, any Arch* 
bishop or other Prelat^e of Ireland (except the suffragans of 
Dublin and the Pope's Legate) from having the cross carried 
before them, holding assemblies (those of the religious orders 

• Wiire Bishops. f Lib. Niger, Fol. 123. 

3b 



378 

excepted) or treating of ecclesiastical causes in the Province 
of Dublin, without the consent of the Archbishop of Dub- 
lin.'" Such was the privilege contained in the Bull of Hono- 
rius III, the interesting consequences of which shall be fully 
illustrated by the ecclesiastical events of the fourteenth cen- 
tury. 

The government of the country had been placed in the 
hands of the Archbishop for about six years, during which 
time he considerably improved the City of Dublin, and 
among other buildings had caused the castle of that metro- 
polis to be erected at his own cost. He removed the Priory 
of Inis-Patrick founded by Sitric to Holm-Patrick, in the 
Barony of Balruddery, fourteen miles north of Dublin; hav- 
ing at the same time augmented the revenues of the Nunnery 
of Grace^Dieu. 

The union of the See of Glendaloch with that of Dublin 
may be said to have been effected during the incumbency of 
Henry Loundres; although that union had been contemplated 
and in fact determined upon in the Council of Kells, held 
under Cardinal Paparo in 1252.* It was observed in that 



* I am ready to admit that this union of the Sees of Dobliu and of Glendaloch 
forms a very complicated and difficult portion of the ecclesiastical history of our 
country. It is allowed by all our annalists, that the union had been effectually 
established in 1214, under the incumbency of HfSaiy, Archbishop of Dublin; and 
yet, strange to say, we find in the fifteenth century no less than four bishops actu- 
ally promoted to the See of Glendaloch and canouically exercising episcopal func- 
tions within that diocess. (See Cent, xv.) The difficulty, then, amounts to this; 
how are we to account for the regular appointment and canonical administration of 
these four prelates, who in the fifteenth century governed the See of Glendaloch, 
after that same See had been permanently united to Dublin two hundred years be- 
fore ! My opinion on this subject is, that the union effected in 1*214 by Ueniy de 
Loundres was at the time a mere union of the temporalities, and that Glendaloch 
was allowed together with other privileges to retain the title of an episcopal see ; 
the Bishop whereof was to be a Vicar or occasional assistant to the Archbishop of 
Dublin. The whole tenor of the proceedings, even from the time of the Council 
of Kells, proves beyond the possibility of doubt, that the comparative temporalities 
of the two Sees were the main object contemplated by this perhaps necessary 
union. Dublin had been raised to the rank of an Archdiocess, but it was very in- 
considerable, while its revenues became, in consequence, proi>ortionably inadequate. 



379 

Council, that the diocess of Dublin, which had then been 
raised to the rank of an Archiepiscopal See, had been alto- 
gether too limited. Its bounds towards the north and in the 
Western direction were allowed to be considerably fair, while 
towards the south it extended no farther than the walls of the 
City. On the other hand the ancient diocess of Glendaloch, 
comprizing within itself a namber of districts at that time 
powerful and comparatively populous, spread itself beyond 
the bounds of the now County of Wicklow and came even to 
the very walls of Dublin. Qy a decision, therefore, of the 
Synod of Kells, a considerable portion of the diocess of 
Glendaloch was to have been annexed to the See of Dublin; 
the remainder was to be reserved for Gildas, the existing in- 
cumbent, upon whose demise the two Sees were to have been 
permanently united. This union did not, however, take place 
until' 1214, under the incumbency of Henry De Loundres. 
During the time of St. Laurence OToole, Ireland was in too 
distracted a state for the arrangement of an union of such 
importance. John Comin^ who succeeded St. Laurence, had 
not been many years placed in the Archiepiscopal chair of 
Dublin when Henry II died/ and in fact the whole of John's 
incumbency was almost one continued round of annoyance, 



H«Dce the Cotmcil of Kells ordained, that a ceitaia portion of the diocess of Glen- 
daloch shoald he annexed to the See of Dublin^ and tha%, moreover^ oa the death 
of' Gildas, the exuting incumbent, the two Sees should be united. It appears, 
that Honorius III in the Bull which he delivered to Henry Loundres, dated the 6th 
of October, 1216, actually confirmed the arrangement which Cardinal Paporo and 
the Council of Kells had ordained ; and that Henry II and his son John, availing 
themselves of a regal privilege, had also ratified the same. The ratification of 
John, which clearly supports my opiniou, concludes with these words: — *'So that 
the Archbishop of Dublin should hold the two Diocesses (of Dublin and Glenda* 
loch) in his possession without any reservation ; and that the Bbhop of Glendalocli 
should be Chaplain or Vicar to the Archbii^hop of Dublin/' lliis union had, at 
length, been amicably agreed upon during the administration of Henry Loundres, 
and effected as well probably by the civil power which the Archbishop had then in 
his hands, as by the personal influence which he maintained over the clerjty and 
people of Glendaloch. For the four Prelates of Glendaloch above alluded to, see 
Cent. XV. c. 1. 



380 

either from the Deputy who had been placed over Ireland or 
from the ineonstancy and overbearing spirit of King John 
himself. It appears that John had actually ratified tbe deci- 
sion agreed npon at the Council of Kelh, and most probably 
it was upon this occasion that Archbishop Comin founded the 
Church of St. Patrick outside the walls of the City. It is, 
bowever, certam, that no actual union had at that time taken 
place, nor was it comj^ed until the period which has been 
already specified. 

In 1214 and on the death of William Peryn, Bishop of 
Glendaloch, Henry Lomidres undertook to unite that See 
with the Archiepiscopal one of Dublin. As soon as the Arch- 
bishop's intentions had been made known, the clergy of Glen- 
daloch aided by tbe difierent powerful septs in the County of 
Wicklow strenuously protested against the measure, and their 
opposition, linked as they had been with other dynasts, 
assumed in a short time all the appearance of one desperately 
united national struggle. With great difficulty, however, an 
arrangement had been effected, and the two Sees were united, 
yet on condition tbat a cathedral church should be erected on 
a site within the ancient district df the diocess of Glendaloch.* 
Agreeably to this arrangement, the collegiate Church of St. 
Patrick, founded by Archbishop Comin and actually situated 
within the ancient diocess of Glendaloch, was now erected 
into a Cathedral, '' united (to use the words of Archbishop 
Allen) with Christ Church under one spouse, saving to the 
other Church, the pre-eminence in dignity." Its first Dean 
was William Fitz-Guy, and besides Vicars choral, the Arch- 
bishop appointed a Chanter, a Chancellor and a Treasurer; 
to each of whom he assigned revenues and rectories. The 
Cathedral of St. Patrick had on this occasion been enlai^ed 

* Doctor Barkei in his " Hibernia Dominican^/' has annexed, as a second con- 
dition, that Glendaloch should enjoy a resident Archdeacon. From what has been 
stated in a previous note, this might, as a probable consequence, be admitted. — 
Sec Hib. Dom. c. 9. p. 186. 



381 

and considerably beautified; and whereas it stood on the site 
of the former Parochial Church of St. Nicholas without the 
walb of the City^ a new and splendid capella was fitted up 
at the south side of the choir and was soon after with great 
solemnity dedicated to that Saint, as Patroa of the Parish. 

The administration of Henry De Louodres seems to have 
been embittered by an almost continued series of the most 
disagreeable events. Among these the conduct of King John, 
over whom the Archbishop possessed considerable influence, 
and the constant disputes which had been kept up between 
himself and his tenantry in the dioeess of Dublin appear to 
have been the source of the greatest uneasiness. Attached ag 
the Archbishop Henry had been to the paramount interest of 
England, and still anxious for its further a^randizement, 
nothing could more sensibly wound his feelings than an 
attempt to upset or even to weaken that spirit of sovereignty 
with which the great mass of his countrymen would seem to 
have been at that time actuated. It must, therefore, have 
been a painful ceremony for such a man to be the principal 
vntness at the execution of the deed by which John reMgned 
the kingdoms of England and of Ireland to the Pope, and 
consented to hold them as a fief, by the service of one thou- 
sand marcs to be paid annually; seven hundred for England 
and three hundred for Ireland.* When, however, John did, 
on that occasion, do homage to Pandolph the Legate, 
Henry, among all the Prelates who were present, was the 
only person who ventured to express his indignation, both at 
the terms of this contract and at the degradation to which his 
Monarch had subjected himself. Throughout the whole of 
John's misfortunes, Henry proved himself a sincere and 8tead-> 
fast friend, and when at length he had attended the congress 
of Runnymede together with the few lords who still continued 
on the King's side, his honourable sincerity was appreciated 

• Math. Paris, p. 227,— Math. Westminster, p. 93. 



382 

and he was allowed a seat immedialely after the Archbishop 
of Canterbary. 

The harshness, and if history may be credited, the cruel 
injustice with which Henry had, on more than one occatton, 
acted towards his own tenantry in Ireland, can add but very 
little credit to his character as an English patriot It is said, 
that at one time he summoned his tenantry together, and aflter 
having received their leases and other documents into his 
hands, he instantly and without assigning a reason, cast 
Aem all into the fire."* The tenants, most of whom had 
been his own countrymen, became enraged and a violent 
tumult ensued in which the Archbishop's life was in danger 
and he was obliged to fly for safety. The result of these pro- 
ceedings proved rather unfavourable to the Archbishop; for 
Henry III, then King of. England, on being furnished with 
the history of these occurrences had Henry De Loundres re* 
moved from his office of Lord Justice, and Maurice Fits- 
Oerald was immediately substituted in his place. The remain- 
der of Henry's days were devoted to the ordinary duties of his 
diocess until 1228, when he died and was buried in a wooden 
sepulchre, in the north wall of Christ Church and immediately 
opposite the tomb of John Comin. 

Even at this early season the working of the tithe system 
began to produce its natural effects; it soon became the con- 
stant and fruitful source of public contention not only between 
the clergy and people, but even between the prelates them- 
selves. Richard Fleming having been consecrated Bishop of 
Leighlin in 1217 had, as soon as he entered on the adminis- 
tration of his diocess, commenced a suit against the Prior of 
Conal for certain tithes belonging to Lesse, now part of the 
Queen's County. This claim was, however, peaceably ad- 
justed, by the Bishop allowing the possessions and tithes to 
the Prior, reserving to himself and to his successors a yearly 

? Lib. Niger. Fol. 347. 



383 

pension of tea marcs, to be paid regularly at Leigfaiin. Some 
years after a similar case had been litigated between Richard 
De la Corner, Bishop of Meath, and the Abbot of St. Mary's 
near Dublin. The proceedings in this suit were conducted 
with unbecoming violence; at length the question was referred 
to William, Bishop of Leighlin and other delegates deputed 
by the Pope, when a decision was pronounced in favour of 
the Abbey; reserving twenty pounds to be p&id annually to 
the Bishop. 

But the disputes, which originated between the Bishops of 
Waterford and Lisfnore, relative to church property and tithes, 
had during a great portion of the thirteenth century given rise 
to much angry feeling and even to blood-shed. David, 
Bishop of Waterford and a relative of Miler Fitz-Henry, Lord 
Justice of Ireland, laid claim to certain lands and their tithes, 
situated within the diocess of Lismore. The case was warmly 
contested on both sides, and in it OTelan, Prince of the 
Decies, aided by his tenantry took an active and a decided 
part in favour of the See of Lismore. At length the Arch- 
deacon of Cashel together with the Bishops of Cork and of 
Killaloe undertook, by directions of Innocent III, to decide 
the matter; when the people of the Decies rushing into the 
court seemed resolved on carrying their measure by violence, 
and in the midst of the scuffle which ensued, David, Bishop 
of Waterford, lost his life."* This event, fatal and scandal- 
ous as it had been, did not prevent his successor, Robert, 
from making a still more unwarrantable encroachment on the 
ecclesiastical property attached to the See of Lismore. The 
Bishops of Norwich, Clonfert and Enaghdune having been 
specially delegated caused a canonical citation to be served on 
Robert of Waterford, to which the latter objected and refused 
to attend in court, even by his Proctor. Restitution was, 
however, adjudged to the Bishop of Lismore, and Robert was 

* EpUu Innocent III, — Ware, Bishops. 



384 

moreover condemoed in a fine of one hundred and sixty marcs* 
Fita^Chrutophery Seneschal of Waterford, an influential and 
violent partizan, took an active shaire in the litigation and 
espoused the interest of his Bishop. Accompanied bj a 
numerous train of his dependants, he advanced to Lismore^ 
seized on the Prelate of that See even in his own Cathedral 
and had him conducted to Duogarvan, where he was cast in- 
to prison and loaded with irons. This unpardonable outrage^ 
to which Robert of Waterford was said to have been acces- 
sary, could not for a moment be tolerated by the delegates: 
they assembled in the Cathedral of Cashel, when the Bishop 
of Waterford having again refused to appear, they excommu- 
nicated him and his adherents, and by the Pope's authority 
commanded the Archbishop to proclaim him excommunicated 
throughout his Province. The Pope, moreover, ratified this 
sentence without admitting any written appeal and ordered 
Robert of Waterford to be summoned before him.* It would 
appear, however, that through the mediation of the King, 
the censure was soon after removed, and the question itself, 
which had occasioned so much scandal, was at leogtli amica- 
bly adjusted. 

On the death of Henry De Loundres in 1228, Luke, Dean 
of St. Martin's Church, London, vras chosen as his successor 
in the See of Dublin, on the 13th of December in the same 
year. The election having been proved infi[>rmal was rejected 
by the Pope; Luke, however, was re-elected, consecrated 
and confirmed in the See by Pope Gregory IX, but not until 
the year 1230. From this election are to be dated the various 
complicated and long contested differences which had for so 
many years been kept up between the Dean and Chapter of 
St Patrick's and the Prior and Canons of Christ Church. 
Each Cathedral claimed to itself the canonical and exclusive 
right of electing the archbishop. The Canons of Christ 

• Epist. Innoc. III. 6 Kal, July, 1212.~£dlt. Bosquet. 



386 

Church rested their claim on the principle of antiquity; 
Christ Church being in fact, the Mother Cathedral: while the 
Deioi and Chapter of St Patrick*8 insisted on the ordinances 
of the Council of Kells, on the terms of the union between 
the Sees of Glendaloch and of Dublin and on the grant and 
pciyileges of King John. After a lengthened controversy on 
both sides, the Archbishop Luke decided the question in this 
manner: ^^that henceforth the election should take place in 
the Chuivh of the Holy Trinity (Christ Church) and that the 
Prior and Canons of Christ Church together with the Dean 
and Chapter of St Patrick's should there and in no other 
fiuce, by united sufFn^es, elect the person roost worthy to 
fill the vacant Archiepiscopal See of Dublin." In virtue of 
this arrangement, to which all parties had, at least at that 
time^ willingly subscribed, the Canons and the Chapter pro* 
ceeded to an election, on the demise of Luke in 1226, and 
their choice fell on Ralph De Norwich, a Canon of St. Pat- 
rick's. Fair and canonical as this election might appear, it 
was nevertheless set aside by a decision from Rome, and 
Fulk De Sandford, in Oxfordshire, Treasurer of St Paul's 
Church in London, was declared Archbishop and consecrated 
in July 1266.* Whatever might have been the cause of the 
late rejection, and it would appear to have been mixed up 
with some privi^ iactbnal intrigue among the canons them- 
selves, the union between St Patrick's and Christ Church 
was once more dissolved, and each party insisted on their 
respective privileges. Fulk De Sandford presided over the 
See for fifteen years and was buried in St. Patrick's Church 
in a capetla founded by himself and dedicated to the Blessed 
Virgin. 

Immediately after the death of the Archbishop, the King 
granted licence of election,t when the Prior and Canons of 

• Matthew, Paris ad A. 1256. 
t Soon after the introduction of the Knglish laws into this country the usual 
mode of epmcopa) election was in this manner : When a vacancy should happen to 

3 c 



386 

Christ Church chose WiUiam De la Corner, the King^s chap* 
kin; while the Dean and Chapter of St. Patrick'^ elected 
Fromond De la Bruen, the Pope's- cbaplmn and at that time 
Chancellor of Ireland. Each party strenuously maintained 
the validity of their respective proceedings and the cootvo- 
▼ersy was conducted with great violence on both sidi^; at 
length the two elections were set aside by the Pope, and 
John of Darlii^ton (in the Dt^opric of Durham) was de- 
dared Archbishop and was soon after consecrated in the 
Abbey of Waltham by John Peckam, Archbishop of Canter- 
bury, This <x)ntroverey, which must have evidently occa- 
sioned more trouble than benefit to the Church of Ireland^ 
was maintained without interruption until the incumbency of 
Alexander De Bicknor, in the fourteenth centary, after 
which period, it appears, th^t the archbishops of Dublin had 
been regularly promoted to that See by provision of the Pope. 
During the lapse of the thirteenth century, three important 
synods had been held and several ecclesiastical regulations 
were devised for the maintenance of discipline. One of 
these synods was convened at Wexford by John De St John, 
Bishop of Ferns. This Prelate, after having been for a time 
treasurer of Ireland, succeeded Alban O'MoUoy in the Dio* 
cess of Ferns and was the first Englishman who had been 
promoted to that See. In the year 1240, John held a Synod 

OGCvr^ eh* Chapter first memeriaUed the King, for a Cmige d*E$lire, that is» a 
licence to proceed to election -, after electioa had been made, a regular certificate 
thereof was presented to the King and obtained his assent *. the proceedings of the 
Chapter being at the same time svbmttted to the Holy See and confirmed* the 
Kiog accordingly issaed a writ of restitutioa to the temporalities or episcopal pos- 
sessions, which always remained in the hands of the crown until the vacant see 
had been filled. Should the Chapter proceed to election without the C&ng9 d'Et^ 
lire, they became by law subject to seriovs peDaltiea^ while the electioa was de- 
dared null and void. These penalties had been generally pardoned by the King ; 
yet we have instances in which they had been rigorously enforced. — See Reily's 
Placita Parliamentarian p. 296* On particular occasions, when an election should 
happen to be contested, the Pope, by the plenitude of his authority, generally in- 
terfered and provided for the see. 



•387 

in the Priory of Selskar, at Wexford * Teiv years after 
another Synod was held in Toam, under Florence Mac Plin, 
Archbisliop of that Diocess, the decrees of which are not 
extant; and in 1262^ a provinciai Synod was held at Drog^ 
heda by Patrick O'Scanlan, Arohbishopof Amagh.t 

It was by no means nnosual in this age to entrust the office 
of Loid Justice or of Chief Governor of Ireland to the 
management of ecclesiastics. Besides Henry De Loundres^ 
whoy as has been noticed, was Justiciary in the reign of 
King John, two other prelates had been commissioned to 
discharge the duties of the same office towards the close of 
this century* Stephen De Fulbum, a native of Fulbum in 
Cambridgeshire, of the Order ot Hoapttallers and Bishop of 
Waterford, was appointed Lord Justice of Ireland by Ed- 
ward I in 1281.:j: This Qovemor is represented to have, 
during the entire of his administration, earnestly employed 
all the influence arising from his office^ with a view of ob- 
tainiiag the advantage of the English laws for the people of 
Ireland and of inspiring the King with a eoncem for their 
interest The native Irish, and especially those who lived 
contiguous to the pale, had been now so harrassed that self*- 
preservation itself dictated the necessity of making at least 
some effort towards changing their former state of tributary 
vassalage and of placing themselves under the protection ctf 
the laws of England. For this purpose they guaranteed to 
pay eight thousand marcs to the King, provided he would 
place them under the security of the English laws. With 
this request Edward, on his part, seemed not unwilling to 
comply; but his answer was grounded on a condition which 
at once developes both the policy and the mercenary spirit of 
the rulers of Ireland in those times. *^li seems, (replies 
Edward,) sufficiently expedient to us and to our council, to 
grant them the English laws, provided always, that the geue- 

* See WUkins ConcUia, T. I. t See Chap. II. t Ware Annals ad A. 1281. 



388 

ral consent of our people, or at least of the prelates and 
nobles of that land, well affected to us, shall uniformly con- 
cur in their behalf. We therefore command you, that having 
entered into treaty with these Irish people, and having 
agreed between you and them on the higkest fine of money 
that you can obtain on tins account, to be paid to us, you, 
with the consent of all or at least the greater and sounder 
part aforesaid, make such a composition with the said pe<^ple, 
in the premises, as you shall judge in your diligence to be 
most expedient for our honour and interest."* tt required but 
little discernment to foresee that a compliance with this con- 
dition was, in the present state of Ireland, absolutely impos- 
sible. The Norman barons and the leading English settlers, 
who had now determined on cantonizing the country among 
themselves, were not likely to subscribe to a measure which 
might so effectually upset their favourite views. In fact each 
of these marauders began now to consider himself a petty 
sovereign and at times appeared disposed to set at defiance 
the authority of the English Monarch himself. It is not, 
therefore, surprising, that this reasonable boon of the Irish 
people should have been rejected. They were refused to be 
sheltered in the land of their birth, even by the laws of the 
very people who had outrageously stript them of their pro^ 
perty ; and thus had insurrections and re-action been created, 
the English name became deservedly odious, charity as well 
as common justice seemed to have forsaken the land, while 
the lives and property of the people became a prey to every 
unprincipled adventurer and the whole country was at length 
brought to the very brink of ruin. In such a state of society 
it cannot be supposed that Stephen t)e Fulburn or any other 
governor could have it in his power to effect any thmg which 



* These directions had been transmitted to Ireland during the administration of 
the Justiciary Ufford, the immediate predecessor of Stephen De Fulburn,— See 
Holinshed. 



389 

might be considered of benefit to the people. He held the 
office of Lord Justice for six years, during which time he 
was allowed a pension of five hundred pounds, to be paid to 
him annually out of the Exchequer.* It appears, however, 
tlmt after his death in 1287, the King had seized on all his 
gcMds and chattels, and even on the vessels and ornaments 
ef the Church, for debts due to the crown while this Prdate 
had been in office. Nevertheless a writ was soon after issued 
lo the treasurer and to the barons of the Exchequer enjoining 
them to make r^titution to the Cathedral, by restoring the 
CfavYch ornaments Und other property to the Dean and Chap- 
ter.i* John Sandfc^, Archbishop of Dublin, was appointed 
to succeed Stephen in the office of Chief Governor. This 
Prelate, however, continued but a short time Lord Justice 
of Ireland. Having been sent by Edward I on an embassy 
to the Emperor, John had scarcely returned to England 
when he was seised ''with a violent malady (as Westminster 
expresses it,) and went the way of all flesh." His remains 
were brought to Ireland and deposited in St. Patrick's Church 
on the 20th of February, 1294.$ 

The many and fruitless contests, which had been for so long 
a time kept up between Frederic II and the Popes Innocent 
III and Gregory IX, have given rise to some events which 
may serve to show the attachment of the Irish clergy to the 
Holy See; especially when contrasted with the conduct of our 
more opulent and powerful neighbours. During these feudal 
tames, it veas not unusual for the popes to make an appeal to 
the clergy of particular national churches and to call on them 
for assistance. Such appeals appeared then almost obligatory 
from the fact, that the suppression of abuses had been the 
object contemplated on these occasions. In the course of 
the thirteenth century, these demands had, at four different 
periods been made on the clergy both of England and of 

* Pat. 13, Edw. I, M«m. 5. f Id. 17 Edv^. I, Mem. 4. t Ware Bishops. 



390 

Ireland. Dunng the administration of Maurice Fitzgerald^ 
Lord Justice of Ireland in 1229^ Stephen, Nuncio to Gregory 
IX, came to Ireland with apostolic mandates, by virtue of 
which the tenth of all Church temporalities throughout the 
kingdom was required for the purpose of defraying the ex- 
penses of those painful conflicts to which the simony of the 
Emperor Frederic II had given rise. In Ireland the com«> 
mission of the Nuncio was successful; among the clergy and 
barons of England, the propriety of the demand was vio- 
lently contested. Encouraged by the example of Ranulp* 
hus, Earl of Chester, the bishops and clergy of that country 
persisted for a time in rejecting the claim; dreading, how- 
ever, the displeasure of Henry III, they at length consented, 
and for this time, at least, was a proportional share of the 
rent advanced on the part of the clergy of England and 
Wales.* A second demand was made in 1240 by the Legate 
Petrus De Supino, on which occasion fifteen hundred marcs 
were collected throughout Ireland. In 1247, John Rusus, 
Legate to Innocent IV, not daring to venture into England, 
repaired to this country and made a third appeal to the Irish 
clergy, when six hundred marcs were readily collected; and 
a fourth claim having been made in 1270 was attended with: 
similar success. 

. Against these proceedings the clergy of England loudly 
remonstrated, and, by way of supplement, their remonstrance 
was artfully fitted up with invectives against a number of 
Italian ecclesiastics, who had, it seems, found means at that 
time of obtaining benefices in England. Whether the memo- 
rialists had been reasonable or not, in urging these complaints, 
is scarcely worth the trouble of investigating; at all events 
they appear to have forgotten, that almost all the principal 
sees together with the rich monasteries of Ireland were, at 
the very same time, exclusively in the possession of English 
ecclesiastics. 

* Ware, Aanals, ad A. 1229 ct passim* 



CHAPTER n. 

Successors of St. Patrick — Episcopal Sees — Religious 
Foundations of the Thirteenth Century. 

The Primatial See had, in the commencement of the 
thirteenth century, been placed under the government of 
EuGBNE Mac Gillividbr,* The incumbency of this Prel- 
ate continued until 1216, in ivhich year he died at Rome, 
shortly after the termination of the fourth general Council of 
Lateran. Immediately on the death of Eugene the Chapter 
proceeded to an election, and convened the capitular without 
having obtained the usual licence of the King. Luke Nbt- 
TsaviLLE, Archdeacon of Armagh, a man of prudence and 
learning, was the person elected. He forthwith proceeded to 
London, but, as might be expected, the King refused to con- 
firm his nomination. This rejection served only to render the 
Chapter more united; however, the royal licence being at 
length obtained, Luke was re-elected, and having obtained 
the King's assent and the confirmation of the Pope, he was 
in the same year (1217) consecrated by Stephen Langton, 
Archbishop of Canterbury. He presided over the See ^until 
1227, in which year he died and was interred, as some au- 
thorities will have it, in the Abbey of Mellifont; but accord- 
ing to others, in the Dominican Convent at Drogheda, of 
which he was the founder and munificent benefactor.f 

DoNATus OTiDABRA and Albert styled Coloniensis 
governed in succession the Archiepiscopal See, after the death 
of the Primate Luke. The fprmer of these prelates was 
Bishop of Clogher, from which See he had been translated 

• See Chap. I. t MS. S. Palri ad A. 1227. 



392 

in 1227; and the latter^ after his consecration at Westminster 
in 1240> returned to Armagh, but resigned the administration 
of the Archdiocess about seven years afterwards and died on 
the Continent.* The mercenary proceedings of many of the 
chief governors of Ireland, on the demise or resignation of a 
bishop, became at this peoiod most reprehensible. To dis- 
cover some informality in the acts of the Chapter, or to with- 
hold the royal assent were matters of ordinary occurrence, 
while the see, for a term of years, was kept vacant and the 
revenues were allowed to flow into a channel which neither 
the canons of the Church or the law of the realm had ever 
thought proper to contemplate. For the purpose of prevent- 
ing a repetition of this abuse. Innocent IV, into whose hands 
Albert had resigned his Archdiocess, now deemed it necessary 
to interfere and immediately proceeded to the consecration of 
his successor. 

Rbinbr (Reginald), a native of Ireland and a member of 
the Order of Preachers, was the person selected by the Pon- 
tiff. This ecclesiastic had already distinguished himself by 
his apostolical career in various parts of Italy, along the 
Rhine and in Switzerland. In the general Chapter of his 
Order held at Bononia in 1221, at which the great Patriarch 
St Dominick presided, Reginald was one of the twelve nomi- 
nated on that occasion, and was soon afler despatched to 
England with commissionary powers to lay the foundation of 
this new invaluable institute in that kingdom. Having suc- 
ceeded to a certain extent in England, he soon after passed 
over into his own country, where his services had been most 
amply appreciated; afler which he proceeded to England and 
from thence to Rome, during the pontificate of Gregory IX.f 
Reginald returned to Ireland about the close of the year 1247 
and presided over the See of Armagh for nine years: he died 
at Rome in 1256 and was succeeded by 

• Wwc, Bishope, f Echard, Tom. I. 



393 

Abraham O'Conellan, Archpriest of the Church of Ar- 
magh. This Prelate, immediately after his election, pro- 
ceeded to Rome and was invested with the pallium. He pre- 
sided, however, but two years after his return from the Con- 
tinent, and upon his death in 1260, the King granted to the 
Chapter of Armagh the power of electing a successor. 

Patrick O'Scanlan, of the Order of Preachers and 
Bishop of Raphoe, was unanimously elected by the Chapter 
to fill the archiepiscopal chidr. As soon as the decision of 
the Chapter had been made known to Henry III, that Mon- 
arch, already acquainted with the merits of Patrick, caused 
letters in his favour to be directed to Urban IV, and on the 
$th of the following November, 1261, the election was con- 
firmed and he was promoted to the Metropolitan See. On 
the following year (1262) this Prelate convened a provincial 
Synod in Drogheda at which all the suffragans of the Pro- 
vince assisted and some likewise from the Province of Tuam, 
together with the Lord Justice and many of the principal 
nobility of the kingdom^ This Synod was convened for the 
purpose of asserting the primatial rights of Arpiagh over the 
provinces and of considering the claims of Hugh, Bishop of 
Meath; that Prelate having for some time insisted on the 
right of a canonical exemption from the visitations pf the 
Primate. It appears from the Register of Octavian De Pa- 
latio. Archbishop of Armagh,* that the privileges of the 
Primatial See were in this Synod ratified and published, and 
it was decreed ^'that it should be lawful for the Archbishop 
of Armagh and his successors, as Primates of Ireland to 
visit the Bishop and . clergy of Meath, and to hear causes 
therein.*' This right, which regarded conclusively the personal 
visitations of the Primate, was in the fifteenth century al- 
lowed even to commissioners deputed with visitatory powers 
by the Metropolitan See of Armagh .f While the equity 

• Fol. 282 t Swain's Heg»»ter, p. 106. 

3 D 



394 

of his administration had been admired in this country, 
the zeal and firmness which he displayed on many trying 
occasions were honourably appreciated by the Pontiffs Alex- 
ander and Urban at Rome. The privileges conferred on 
this Prelate by Alexander IV were rather of a personal des- 
cription;* but in the month of November 1263 he received 
from Urban IV a Bull in which the important question of the 
Primacy was involved and from which we shall take the op- 
portunity of making the following extract: ''But the Primacy 
of all Ireland, which your predecessors are known to have 
undoubtedly enjoyed always and up to this time, we follow- 
ing the example of Pope Celestine, our predecessor, do, by 
apostolical authority, confirm the same to you and to your 
successors; ordaining that the archbishops, bishops and other 
prelates of Ireland shall at all times show unto you as Pri- 
mate and to your successors, both obedience and reverence/'f 
The Primate Patrick O'Scanlan, after an incumbency of ten 
years, died in the Monastery of St. Leonard at Dundalk and 
was buried in a convent of his own order at Drogheda. 

Nicholas, styled in the annals Son of Molissa, was elected 
his successor and was consecrated in 1272. Under this Prel- 
ate, the works already commenced in the Cathedral of Ar^ 
magh were completed, in a style of such singular beauty that 
the like was not to be found in the kingdom. The Primate 

* Arch. Apost Lib. A. 

t Vide jus primatiale, &b Oliv. Plunkett, A. 1672— et jus Primal, ab H. Mac 
Mahon, 1728. Archbishop Talbot and the advocates of the Dublin primacy have 
considered this document as inadmissible, and question the authenticity of the Bull 
itself, on the following grounds : First, because it is not to be found in the BulU* 
Hum Ramcnum, Secondly, it is not to be had in the BuUarium Ordinit Putdica* 
forum, to which Order Patrick, Archbishop of Armagh, had belonged ; and thirdly, 
it does not appear either in the Vatican Tabulary or in the Apottolical Archives. — 
Moreover, they assert, that this document, in itself so decisive, bad not on any oc- 
casion been produced by either Patrick or his successors during the controversy on 
this question, until at length and for the first time it happened to be promulgated 
by Richard Ralphion, Archbishop of Armagh about the middle of the fourteenth 
century.— Vide jus Prim. Dub. 1674. 



395 

Nicholas likewise enriched the church with books, costly 
▼estments and a pension of twenty marcs annuallyy to be 
paid out of his manor of Temum-Fechin. He presided over 
the See thirty-one years and died on the 10th of May, A.D. 
1303* 

The See of Kilmore, or as it was styled in the thirteenth 
century, of Brefihy, appears to have been canonically estab- 
lished at thb period; while its prelates were called JEpiscapi 
Bre/inienges and sometimes Triburnejises, from Tribuma, a 
small village in which they resided. Following the authority 
of the Register of Clogher, it would seem that this district 
had formerly belonged to the ancient Diocess of Clones, on 
Lough Erin, over which St. Tigamac presided, and after him 
St. Peidlimid or Felim, the Patron Saint, about the close of 
the sixth century. The first Bishop, however, which our annals 
present in this See of Tribuma or Breffny, is Florence Ca*- 
nacty, in 1231 ;*f softer whom we find a regular succession 
until the year 1454, when Andrew Mac Brady, Bishop of 
Brefiny, erected the Parish Church of St. Felim into a Ca- 
thedral, and henceforth this ecclesiastical district became 
universally designated the Diotess of Kilmare. 

Besides the union of the Sees of Dublin and Glendaloch,! 
as stated in the foregoing chapter, some other unions bad 
been effected about this period, which it may be proper to 
notice. The union of the ancient Diocess of Louth with that 
of Armagh is marked by our annalists as one among the im- 
portant events of the thirteenth century. Louth had been 

• W»re Bishops. 1 1^ 

X The events connected with the Archiep»copel See of Dublin having been 
necesstfily introdvced in the first chtpter i the succession of its prelates, may, for 
the sake of perspicuity, be now briefly inserted. 1. John Comin, Archbishop of 
Dublin, consecrated 1181. 2. Henry Loundres, 1213. 3. Luke, 1230. 4. Fulk 
De Sandford, 1256. 5. John Derlingtoo, 1279. 6. John De Sandford, brother of 
the above mentioned Fulk, 1284. 7. William De Hothum, Provincial of the £ng« 
lish Dominicans, 1297. 8. Richard De Ferings, Archdeacon of Canterbury, pro • 
vided by the Pope and consecrated in 1299. 



396 

united to Ologher sioce the year 1044; upon th^ terms cf 
which union, Christian^ Bishop of Clogher and brother of 
St. Malachy, had afterwards obtained a rescript from Pope 
Innocent II. However, during the incumbency of Albert^ 
Archbishop of Armagh, a visitatory process had been insti- 
tuted in the seteral sees of Ulster^* by means of which the 
circumscribed limits of the Arohdiocess were ascertained^ and 
measures were adopted^ through the agency of Maurice Fitz- 
Gerald, Lord Justice of Ireland, for the enlai^ement of its 
boundaries^ On this occasion it was, that Henry III, had^ 
by authority from Rome^ caused letters patent to be issued, 
in which^ among other matters, it was ordained '^That in con- 
sideration of the poverty of th^ two Sees of Clogher and of 
Armagh, he (the Lord Justice) should provide and cause 
them to be united."f While the execution of this writ had 
been contemplated, Albert died on the Continent; however^ 
during the infiumbency of his successoi*, Reginald, a new 
arrangement was effected, according to which, the Diocess 
of LouCh was to be separated from Clogher and annexed to 
Armagh together with the thrcie deaneries of Drogheda, Ather- 
dee and Dundalk4 About the same time, the Church of 
Ardsrath, with a great portion of the territory of Keneleogan 
had been taken from Clogher and united to the Diocess of 
Deny; while Dromore, which had for centuries been merged 
in Armagh, becomes again a distinct See, under the adminis- 
tration of its Prelate, Gerald, fonnerly Abbot of Mellifont 
and consecrated in April, 1227. 

The union of the See of Mayo with the Archdiocess of 
'Tuam is to be dated at the year 1210. Celestin O'Dubhay, 
the last Bishop of Mayo died about that period, and upon 
his demise, Felix, Ardhbishop of Tuam, acting on the au- 
thority of the Council of Kells, and with the joint concur- 
jrence of the Chapter, entered on the government of the two 
Sees, since which time they have continued united.^ 

^ Record Lond. f Id. t Ware, Bishops of Clogher. j Ware knU<\. 



397 

Agreeably to the system hitherto observed^ we now pro- 
ceed to aa analysis of the priories, abbeys and convents 
which had been founded in the thirteenth century; reserving 
at the same time the priories or hospitals of the Trinitarians 
with other charitable establishments for the history of the 
sixteenth century, 

PHIORIBS OF TH£ CANONS REDULAB OF ST. AUGU8TIN FOUNDED 
IN THE THIRTEENTH CENTURY. 

The Priory of TiIisternagH^ in the Barony of Moy- 
goish and County of Westmeath, was founded for Canons 
Regular of St. Augustin by Geoffry De Constantine about 
the year 1200^ Several of the Nugents> Tuites and Dela- 
mars had been priors of this establishment. In 1590, a lease 
of this Priory was made to Captain William Piers; while 
seven hundred acres of moor, arable and pasture, with forty 
messuages were granted to Uobert Harrison.* 

The Priory of Great Conall, on the banks of the Lifiey 
in the County of Kildare, was founded in 1202 by Meyler 
Fitz-Heniy, for Canons Regular of 8u Augustim The Prior 
of Great Conall sat as a Baron in Parliament In the 3rd of 
Elizabeth, it was granted to Sir Nicholas White.f 

The Priory of Inibtiogve, in the Barony of Gowran, 
County of Kilkenny, was founded A.D. 1206 by Thomas, 
son of Anthony, Seneschal of Leinster, for Canons Regular 
of St. Augustin* The last Prior was Miles Baron. By an 
inquisition taken in the 31st of Henry VIII its possessions 
were found to consist of nine hundved and fifty acres, situated 
in the counties <^ Kilkenny, Carlow and Wexford, nine rec* 
tories, eighteen burgages and thirty-nine messuages; all of 
which, except the rectories, were granted in the 10th of 
Elizabeth to Edmund Butler and his heirs, in capite^ at the 
yearly rent of £28 12s., Irish money.J 

* Aud. Gen. f Id. t Id. 



398 

Thb Priory of Newtown, sitaated on the north bank of 
the Bo3rne, in the County of Meath, was founded in 1206 
for Canons Regular of St. Augustin, by Simon Rochford, 
Bishop of Meath. The Prior of this house was the third 
ecclesiastic in dignity and sat as a Baron in Parliament. — 
Laurence White was the last Prior when, in the 29th of 
Henry VIII, this Priory with five hundred acres of arable 
and pasture land and the rectories of Galtrim, Tillanoge and 
Fennor, were granted to Robert Dillon at the annual rent of 
£16 5s. 9d. One hundred acres in Moyvalley, part of the 
possessions of this Priory, were conferred on Gterald, Earl of 
Kildare* 

The Priort of Tuam, in the Barony of Dunmore, County 
of Gralway, was founded by the family of Buigh, about the 
year 1220, for Canons of St. Victor, following the rule of St. 
Augustin. In the 20th of Elizabeth, this Priory with part of 
its possessions, one hundred acres and two quarters, was 
granted together with the Abbey of Mayo to the burgesses 
and commonalty of Athenry.f 

The Priory of Mullingar (De Domo Dei), in the County 
of Westmeath, was founded in 1227 for Canons Regular of 
St. Augustin by Ralph le Petit, Bishop of Meath. John 
Petit was the last Prior^ An inquisition was held in the 31st 
of Henry VIII and a second in the 13th of Elizabeth, when 
three hundred and sixty acres arable and pasture, with thirty- 
three messuages were granted to Richard Tuite and bis heirs 
male, in capite, by knights service at the yearly rent of 
£16 6s. lOd.t 

The Priory of Aghrim, in the Barony of Kilconnel, 
County of Galway, was founded by Theobald Butler in the 
thirteenth century for Canons Regular of St. Augustin. At 
the suppression, this Priory was granted to Richard Earl of 
Clanrickarde.§ 

* Chief Remem. f Aud. Gen. t Id. § Id. 



399 

Thb Priory op Ballybeg,* ia the Barony of Orrery and 
Kilmore, County of Cork, was founded A.D. 1229 by Wil- 
liam De Barry, for Canons Regular of St. Augustin. In the 
16th of Elizabeth the possessions were consigned to Sir 
Daniel Norton, for the wife of Sir Thomas Norris, President 
of Munster.f 

ABBIBS OF THB CISTERCIAN ORDER FOUNDED IN THE 
THIRTEENTH CENTURY. 

The Abbey of Tintern, in the Barony of Shelbume and 
County of Wexford, was founded for Cistercians by William 
Mareschal, the elder, Earl pf Pembroke, A.D. 12004 This 
nobleman, having been in great danger at sea, made a vow 
that he would erect a monastery ui that place where he should 
first arriye in safety; which obligation he performed by the 
foundation of Tintem Abbey, and afterwards supplied it with 
monks whom he had brought from tlie Abbey of Tintem in 
Monmouthshire. Its first Abbot was John Torrell, and in 
process of time it became amazingly enriched. In 1380 it 
was enacted that no mere Irishman be permitted to make his 
profession in this Abbey. The abbots of Tintern sat as barons 
in Parliament, the last of whom was John Power. By an 
inquisition taken in the 31st of Henry VIII, the possessions 
were found to consist of ninety acres, being the demesne land, 
situated in Tintem, and two thousand two hundred acres of 
moor, arable and pasture land, together with the rectories of 
Banne, Kilmore, Clomines and various others. During the 
same year the Saltees with the Rectory of Kilmore were 
granted to William St Loo; while in the 18th of Elizabeth, 
the Abbey and sixteen townlands, with their tithes and the re* 

* For the Priories of Athawal, Nonagh, Eoiuscorthy, St. Wolstan's, Carrick- 
on-Suir and St. John's in the City of Kilkenny together with the several Com- 
manderies of the Hospitallers, founded at this period, see century XVI, chap. 2. 

t Smith, vol. I. t Ware Mon. 



400 

version of the premises, were granted for ever, in captte, to 
Anthony Colclough, at the annual rent of £26 4s.* 

The Abbey of Kilbegoan (De Flumine Dei), in the 
Barony of Moycashel and County of Westmeath, was founded 
for Cistercians A.D. 1200.t Its possessions consisted of 
one thousand and twenty acres of wood, arable and pasture 
land, three water mills, eighteen messuages and twenty-six 
rectories. The last Abbot was Maurice O'Shanahan in the 
31st of Henry VI 11, when an inquisition was held and the 
property was confiscated. In the 11th of Elizabeth, eight 
carucates of this land were granted to Robert Dillon, at the 
annual rent of £6 16s., the remainder was parcelled out in 
1618 by James I to divers favourites, to be held of the King, 
as of the Castle of Dublin, in free and common soccage. j: 

The Abbey of Graiokem anaoh (De Valle Salvatoris), in 
the Barony of Gowran and County of Kilkenny, was founded 
by William Mareschal, the elder, Earl of Pembroke, for Cis- 
tercians, A.D. 1204. In 1380, it was enacted that no mere 
Irishman should be allowed to profess in this Abbey« The 
Abbot of Graignemanagh sat as a Baron in Parliament. — 
By an inquisition held in the 9th of Elizabeth, this Abbey 
was found to possess six hundred and twenty acres of arable 
and pasture land, eight townlands and eleven rectories, with 
the tithes and alterages of the same. The last Abbot was 
Charles Mac-Morough O'Cavanagh. In the 9th of Elizabeth 
this Abbey and eight townlands in the Counties of Carlow 
and Wexford with two hundred acres of land in the County 
of Kilkenny were granted for ever, at an annual rent of 
£41 to James Butler.§ 

The Abbey op Abbiwgton (Wotheney), in the County of 
Limerick, was founded for Cistercians by Theobald Fitz-Wal- 
ter. Lord of Carrick, A.D. 1205. The last Abbot was John 
O'Mulryan, when in 1540 this Abbey was suppressed, and 

* Aud. Gen. t Annals Four Masters. t Lib. Inquis. $ And. Gen. 



401 

in the 6th of Elizabeth^ deven rectories and fifteen townlands., 
in the Counties of Limerick and Kerry, were granted at an 
annual rent to Peter Walsh, who was also by compact obliged 
to maintain one horseman on the premises.* 

The Abbby of Tracton (De Alba tractu), in the Barony of 
Kinalea, County of Cork, was founded by Maurice Mac 
Carthy for Cistercians, A.D. 1224. In 1380 it was enacted 
that no mere Irishman should be suffered to make his pro- 
fession in this Abbey. The Abbot of Tracton sat as a Baron 
in Parliament. In 1668 the Abbey and its possessions were 
granted by EUzabeth to Sir James Craig, on his paying a 
iineof £7 158.; they were afterwards assigned to Richard. 
Earl of Cork, who passed a patent for the same in the 7th 
of James I.f 

Those religious communities, usually designated '' Mendi- 
cant Orders," had, during this century, arrived in Ireland, 
for whom the following Convents had been established. 

CONVENTS OP THE DOMINICAN ORDER FOUNDED IN THE 
THIRTEENTH CENTURY. 

The Convent of St. Saviour, Dublin, on the north bank 
of the Litky and on the site of the present Four Courts, was 
founded about the year 1216 by William Mareschal the elder, 
Earl of Pembroke, for monks of the Cistercian Order. — 
Eight years after this period the Dominicans arrived in Ire- 
land, at which time (1224) the Cistercians resigned this es- 
tablishment of St. Saviour into their possession; on condition 
that on the feast of the Nativity, they should offer a lighted 
taper at the Abbey of St. Mary, in acknowledgement that 
this Monastery did originally belong to the Cistercian Order.j: 
John Decer, Mayor of Dublin in 1380, was one of its prin- 
cipal benefactors; he repaired and adorned the ehurch with a 

* Aud. Gen. t Smith, vol. I. $ Wars Collect. 

3e 



402 

range of massive pillars and afterwards completed and beau* 
tified the high altar. The friars of this house were distin- 
guished promoters of literature in those days and in 1421 
succeeded in establishing a school of philosophy and of di- 
rinity on Usher's Island. On this occasion it was that they 
had caused a bridge to be erected across the Liffey, which 
has been since known by the name of the "Old Bridge."* 
During the thirteenth century there had been three general 
chapters held in this Convent and a fourth in 1313. The last 
Prior was Patrick Hay, and by an inquisition held in the 33rd 
of Henry VIII, the possessions in the County of Meath, con- 
sisting of one hundred and twenty acres with six messuages, 
were granted to Sir Thomas Gusake; while in the 20th of 
Elizabeth, the Convent with divers property in the City of 
Dublin, was given to Gerald, Earl of Ormond, for ever, in 
free soccage, at the yearly rent of 20s. Irish money .+ 

The Convent of Drooheda, under the invocation of St. 
Mary Magdalen, was founded by Luke Netterville, Arch- 
bishop of Armagh, 1224. Richard II and Henry IV were 
great benefactors to this Convent. Four general chapters had 
been held here, namely: in 1290, 1303, 1347 and 1412. The 
last Prior was Peter Lewis, and in the 35th of Henry VIII, 
this Fnary with various houses, gardens and twelve acres of 
land near Drogheda was granted to Walter Dowdall and 
Edward Becke, at the annual rent of 2s. 2d. Irish money.:{: 

The Black Abbey in Kilkenny was founded in honour 
of the Holy Trinity, for Dominicans, by William Mareschal, 
junior. Earl of Pembroke, in the year 1225. This establish- 
ment maintained for centuries an high rank in the Order; four 
general chapters have been held in it, namely: those of 1281, 
1302, 1306 and 1346.§ Its last Prior was Peter Cantwell; 
and in the 35th of Henry VIII, an inquisition was held, 
when the possessions, consisting of twenty-four houses, six- 

• Uib. Dom. f And. Gen. set ccnl. XVIIl, chap. 2. | Id. § Archdall Mon. 



403 

teen gardens, nineteen acres in Kilkenny with one hjyindred 
and twenty acres, nine messuages and the tithes and alterages 
of the same, were granted to Walter Archer, the Sovereign^ 
and to the burgesses and commonalty of Kilkenny, for ever, 
at the annual rent of 12s. 4d. Irish money.* This ancient 
and beautiful Abbey had been entirely demolished, with the 
exception of the tower and the principal south aisle of the 
church. During the great national struggle of the nineteenth 
century, when millicms in chains insisted on the right of being 
free, the numerous influential meetings of the spirited citizens 
of Kilkenny held in the Black Abbey should be for ever re- 
corded in the annals of Ireland. About the year 1816 the 
Abbey was repaired and beautified in a style of superior ele- 
gance; while its immense stately window of stained glass and 
the other interior decorations, contrasted with the ivy-clad 
tower and the massive pile of mouldering ruins which sur- 
round it, have decidedly contributed to render the Black 
Abbey of Kilkenny one of the most venerable and magni- 
ficent remains of antiquity in the kingdom. 

The Comvbnt op St. Saviour, Waterford, was founded 
for Dominicans by the citizens of Waterford in 1226, and 
was usually denominated ''Black Friars."t General chap- 
ters had been held in this Convent in the years 1277, 1291 
and 1309. The last Prior was William Marten and in the 
34th of Henry VIII this Friary with six messuages and 
twenty-two acres of land in the Liberties of Waterford was 
granted to James White, at the annual rent of 4s. Irish.:{: 

The Convent of St. Mary (S. Marice de Insula), in Cork, 
was erected on an island called Cross-green, at. the south side 
of the City by Philip Barry in the year 1229.| Edward III 
and Edmund Mortimer, Earl of Ulster, were its munificent 
benefactors. In the 35th of Henry VIII, a grant was made 
of the Convent with ten messuages and eighty acres of land 
to William Boureman at the annual rent of 6s. 9d. Irish.|| 

* Aud. Gen. t S^Hb, p. 182. % Aud. Gen. § Hib. Dom. 

H Chief RGmeni.--See Cent. XIX, chap. 2. 



404 

The Convent op Mullinoar was founded in 1237, for 
Dominicans, by the family of Nugent General chapters 
had been held here in 1278, 1292, 1308 and 1314. In the 
8th of Elizabeth, this Convent and one hundted and twenty 
acres of land were granted to Walter Hope at the annual rent 
of £10. 

The Cohvekt of Athenry, in the County of Galway, 
was founded in 1241 by Meyler De Bermingham, Baron of 
Athenry. General chapters were held here in 1242 and in 
1311. In the 16th of Elizabeth, this Convent with thirty 
acres of land was granted to the burgesses of the town of 
Athenry, at the yearly rent of £1 6s. 4d.* 

The Convent of St. Dohinick in Cadkel was foonded by 
David Mac Kelly, Archbishop of Cashel in 1243. This was 
one of the most beaiitiful Convents of the Dominican Order 
in Ireland and general chapters were held in it in the years 
1289 and 1307. Edward Brown wes the last Prior, when in 
the 35th of Henry VIII it was granted to Walter Fleming at 
an annual rent of 2d. 6d.t 

The Convent of Tralee, in Kerry, under the invocation 
of the Holy Cross, was founded by Lord John Fitz-Thomas 
in 1243. It became the general temetry of the Desmond 
family and was suppressed in the 31st of Henry VIII. 

The Convent of Colebainb, in Derry, was founded in 
1244 by the Mac Evelins and dedicated to the Blessed Vir- 
gin. Shane O'Boyle was the last Prior, when in 1542, it 
was suppressed and its property confiscated to the crown.;]; 

The Convent of Sligo was founded in 1252 by Maurice 
Fitz-Gerald. During the general confiscation it was granted 
to Sir William Taaffe.§ 

The Convent of St. Mary, Roscommon, had for its 
founder Felim O'Conor, King of Connaught in 1253. In 
1615 this Convent with sixty-eight acres of land was con- 
ferred on Francis Viscount Valentia. 

• Chief Remdbi. t Aud, Gen. t King, p. 97. i Harris' Ub. 



406 

The CoifVENT op Athy, in the County of Kildare, was 
founded, as it is supposed, by the families of Boiseles and 
Hogans in the year 1257. General chapters had been held 
in this Convent in 1288, 1295 and 1305. It was granted in 
the 35th of Henry VIII, together with fifty acres of pasture 
land on the Barrow, to Martin Pelles, at an annual rent of 
28. 8d.* 

The Convent of St. Mary in Trim, County of Meath, 
was erected by Geoffrey De Geneville in 1263. General 
chapters had been held here in 1285, 1300 and 1315; and 
during the fifteentlx century, three parliaments had been con- 
vened in this Convent. In the 31st of Henry VIII, the pro- 
perty was confiscated to the crown. 

The Convent op Abklow, County of Wicklow, was 
founded by Theobald Fitz-Walter in 1264. In the 35th of 
Henry VIII, this Friary, together with sixteen acres of land 
was given to John Traver8.t 

The Convent op Rossbeecan, in the County of Kilkenny, 
was founded in 1267. In the 3l8t of Henry VIII, this Con- 
vent with sixty acres of land was granted to John Parker. 

The Convent of Youghal, was founded by Thomas 
Lord Offaly in 1268. In the 23rd of Elizabeth, this Convent 
and eleven houses in the town of Youghal were granted to 
William Walsh, at the yearly rent of 2s. Irisluj: 

The Convent op Loreah, County of Tipperary, was 
erected by Walter Burke, Earl of Ulster, A.D. 1269. Ge- 
neral chapters had been held here in 1301 and 1688.§ In 
the 35th of Henry VIII it was suppressed. 

The Convent op Rathbean, in the County of Mayo, had 
for its founder Sir William Burgh in 1274. In 1577, this 
Convent with six quarters of land was given to Thomas Dex- 
ter, at the yearly rent of 2s. Irish. 

The Convent of Deeey was founded by O'Donnel, juniori 

* Attd. Oen. t H. t Id. j Hib. Dom. p. 279. 



406 

Prince of Tirconnell in 1274. In the 35th of Henry VIII, 
this Convent became a ruin. 

The Convent of Kilhallock, in the County of Limerick, 
was founded by Gilbert, son of John Lord Offaly, in 1291. 
A genei-al Chapter was held here in 1340. In the 36th of 
Elizabeth, a grant was made of this Convent to the Sovereign 
and commonalty of Kilmallock.* 

CONVENTS OF THE FRANCISCAN ORDER FOUNDED IN THE 
THIRTEENTH CENTURY. 

The Franciscan Convent of Youghal, the parent es- 
tablishment of that Order in Ireland, was founded by Mau- 
rice Fitz-6eraldy A.D. 1231. The founder was Lord Justice 
of Ireland in 1232, after which he retired to this Convent 
and embraced the institute of St. Francis.f He died in 1257 
and was buried in his Convent of Youghal. This Abbey 
continued for many centuries the usual cemetry of the Des- 
mond family. Provincial chapters had been held here in 
1300, 1312, 1331, 1613 and 1531; while in 1460 the refoi^ 
mation of the Strict Observants had been received. J During 
the terrors of Elizabeth's reign this extensive Convent had 
been pillaged and so completely demolished, that not even a 
single vestige of its ruins was allowed to remain. Those of 
the community, who had escaped the storm, fled for refuge 
into the mountains of the County of Waterford, where they 
were protected and at length settled in a retired but beautiful 
spot called Curragheen, under the patronage of the noble, 
patriotic and benevolent family of Dromanagh. 

The Convent op Carrickfergus, in the County of An- 
trim, had for its founder Hugh De Lacy, A.D. 1232.§ in 
' 1497 this Convent was reformed by the Strict Observants and 
a provincial Chapter was held here in 1510. It was granted 
in the 33rd of Henry VIII to Sir Edmund Fitz-Gerald. || 

• Aud, Geo. t Hamncr, p. 198. | Wadding, Annal. Mid. T. VI. $ Id. 

R Harris* tab. 



407 

The Franciscan doNVENT op Kilkenny was founded for 
Conventuals by Richard Mareschal, Earl of Pembroke^ A.D. 
1234.* Provincial chapters had been held here in 1267 and 
1308. This Convent had been remarkable for its learned 
men, among whom may be noticed the celebrated annalist, 
John Clynn, in 1348. The last Guardian was Patrick De- 
lany, and in the 36th of Henry VIII, the Abbey with its 
appurtenances, nine townlands, including Donmore and Kil- 
feragh, was granted to the Sovereign, burgesses and com- 
monalty of Kilkenny.f This spacious Abbey, delightfully 
situated on the banks . of the Nore, did in ancient times oc- 
cupy the entire site from the river to the street of Irishtown, 
while the venerable ruins which alone have survived the wreck 
clearly bespeak its former elegance and grandeur. The great 
chancel of the church still remains together with its tower 
both light and lofty, and which, for neatness of design and 
execution, has been greatly admired. Its halls of philosophy 
and of divinity continued to be frequented for a series of 
years, while many of the memorable events of the seven- 
teenth century form no inconsiderable trait in the historical 
records of this once celebrated and beautiful Abbey. 

The Convent of St. Francis in Dublin was founded 
A.D. 1236, m that part of the City which is now called Fran- 
cis-street; Henry III patronizing the building, and Ralph le 
Porter having granted an extensive and convenient site for 
the erection thereof.^ Besides Henry III and Edward I, this 
Convent had numerous benefactors, the most influential of 
whom were Bartholomew Creek, an influential citizen, and 
John le Decer, Mayor of Dublin in 1308. Le Decer erected 
a beautiful chapel in the church of this Convent, which was 
dedicated to the Blessed Virgin and in which he was interred.^ 
In the 24th of Henry VIII, the Convent with its appurte- 
nances, four houses in Francis-street and six acres of mea- 

* Waddiogt Annal. Min. f Aud. Geo. t Ware Mon. § Pembri^e. 



408 

(low near dondalkin, was granted to Thomas Stephens, to 
be held in capite, for ever, at the annual rent of 2b. Irish.* 

Thb Convbnt of Mitltiferkam in the Barony of Corkerj 
and County of Westmeatb, was founded for Conventuals by 
William Delamar in the year I236.t The reformation of the 
Strict Observants had been adopted here in 1460, and in 1529 
a provincial Chapter had been held in this Abbey. In the 
8th of Henry VIII, the Convent of Multifemam and its ap- 
purtenances, a water*mill and thirty acres of arable land, 
were granted to Edmund Field, Patrick Clynch and Philip 
Pentenoy, at a fine of £80 and the annual rent of 4s.:t^ — 
When the fury of the storm, created by Henry and Elizabeth, 
had somewhat subsided, this Convent was again placed in the 
possession of the Franciscans and continued in their hands 
during the reign of Charles I, until it was at length com- 
mitted to the flames by the Rochfords, a powerful family in 
this country. The -walls of the cloister are still complete, 
while the surrounding ruins with the steeple rising from a 
small arch to nearly the height of one hundred feet and situ- 
ated on the borders of a delightful lake, contribute to render 
the whole scene at once picturesque and magnificent. By the 
united exertions of a spirited public, this Abbey has been 
lately rebuilt, and is now finished in a style altogether 
worthy the recollections of its former greatness. The Con- 
vent of Multifernam stands and its Abbey flourishes, while 
the despoiler and the plunderer have disappeared, both alike 
laid low and long since levelled to the dust. 

Thb Franciscan Convent of Cork, ^usually called Gray 

* And. Gen. — For the re-settlement of the Franciscan Community in DuUtn, 
dieir aufferingB in defence of the religion of the country and the erection of their 
spacious and splendid church on Merchants' Quajj the reader must be referred to 
centuries XVIII and XIX, chap. 2. The same reference (it roust be observed) is 
applicable also to various convents of the Dominican, Augustinian and Carmelite 
Orders. 

t Archdall, Men. t And. Gen. § See Cent. XVIII and XIX chap. 2. 



409 

Abbey, was founded for Conventual Fi-anciscans by Philip 
Prendergast, on the north side of the City, A.D. 1240-* — 
Henry III and Edward I were great benefactors to this Con- 
vent. A provincial Chapter had been held here in 1291; and 
about the close of the fifteenth century, the rule of the 
Strict Observants had been adopted. Several illustriouB 
members of the house of Desmond had been interred within 
the walls of this Abbey, particularly Cormac, King of Des- 
mond, in 1247; Dermot in 1275 and Thadeeus in 1413. In 
the 8th of Elizabeth, this Convent with its appurtenances, 
forty acres and seven gardens, was granted to Andrew Sky- 
die and his heirs, in capite, at the annual rent of £2 18s. 8d. 
Irish.f 

Thb Convent of Droqheda was erected near the north 
side of the Boyne by the family of Plunket, for Conventuals 
in the year 1240.;]: This foundation is by some writers attri- 
buted to the Darcy family from the particular situation of 
their tomb, which stood in the centre of the choir. It is cer- 
tain^ however, that this family had not arrived in Ireland 
until at least the commencement of the fourteenth cen- 
tury. The Convent of Drogheda was the head of a Warden- 
ship and in 1518 the Observants were placed here. Richard 
Molane was the last Ghiardian, when in the 34th of Henry 
VIII, this Convent with its appurtenances, six acres of mea- 
dow and a messuage in Swords, was granted to Gerald Ayl- 
racr, in capite for ever, at the yearly rent of 3s. 6d. Irish •§ 

The Convent op Watbrford was erected for Conventual 
Franciscans in 1240 by Sir Hugh Purcel and at the close of 
the same year the founder was interred at the right hand side 
of the high altar. Provincial chapters had been held here in 
1317 and in 1469. In the 33rd of Henry VIII, John Lynch 
. being the last Guardian, this Convent was confiscated and 
granted to Patrick Walsh, at the annual rent of 8s. 4d.|| — 

* Wadding Anna). Mod. t Aud. Gen. t Wadding. $ Chief Rem. || A«d. Gen. 

3 F 



410 

The Hospital of the Holy Ghost has been erected on a por- 
tion of its ruins. 

Thb Comvbnt of Ennis, County of Clare, was founded 
in 1240 by Donagh Carbrac O'Brian, for Conventual Fran- 
ciscans.* Dermod and Matthew O'Brian, Princes of Tho- 
mond, had been munificent benefactors, while this Abbey 
continued for centuries the usual cemetry of the Thomond 
family. In 1577 it was confiscated and reverted to the crown 
and in 1621 was ultimately bestowed on a favourite named 
William Dongan.f 

Thb Convent of Athlonb, situated on the east side of 
the Shannon, in the County of Westmeath, was founded for 
Conventuals by Cathal Dearg O'Conor, Prince of Connaught, 
in 124 l.j: On the death of the founder which occurred 
during the same year, the building was completed by Sir 
Henry Dillon and in 1242 the great church was consecrated 
by Albert, Archbishop of Armagh. Henry III was a muni* 
ficent benefactor to this Convent, having among other dona- 
tions, granted the sum of £20 payable annually on the feast 
of All Saints, for the purpose of providing habits for the 
Friars Minors of Athlone, Waterford, Dublin, Cork and Kil- 
kenny. In the 31st of Henry VIII, this ancient Convent 
was suppressed and confiscated to the crown. 

The Convent of Wexford. — According to an ancient and 
concurrent tradition, the Conventual Franciscans settled in 
Wexford about the middle of the thirteenth century, having 
been accommodated and amply assisted by the Knights Hos- 
pitallers, who were at the time in possession of an extensive 
establishment in that- town. The Conventuals of this house 
adopted the more strict reformation of the Observants, A.D. 
1486 and it continued regularly in the hands of their suc- 
cessors until the 35th of Henry VIII when this Convent with 
its appurtenances and eight burgesses in the town of Wex- 

• Wadding, Annal. Min. t Rolls. t Ware— Pier's dcacription of Westni«ath. 



411 

ford valued at 17s. were granted for ever, in capite, to Paul 
Turner and James Devereux, at the annual rent of lOd. Irish.* 
Daring the storms which blew over the sixteenth and subse- 
quent centuries, the members of this establishment remained 
unintimidated ; affording such a display of Christian heroism 
as might well become the spirit and character of primitive 
times. The illustration of this remark shall, however, be re* 
served for its proper place, and may be ibund in the history 
of the seventeenth century. 

The Convent of Limbrick was founded in the reign of 
Henry III by Walter De Burgh, Earf of Ulster.f Edwaid I 
had been among its principal benefactors. In 1534 this Con- 
vent was reformed by the Observants and in the 35th of 
Henry VIII it was granted with ten messuages and ten gar- 
dens to Edmund Sexton at the annual rent of 28. Irish.;}; 

The Convent of Cashel, usually called Hacket's Abbey, 
was founded in the reign of Henry III by William Hacket 
for Conventual Franciscans. The Strict Observants reformed 
this Convent in 1538 and in the 30th of Henry VIII it was 
granted to Edmund Butler at the annual rent of 2s. lOd. 

The Convent qf I>undalr wafr founded in the reign of 
Henry III by Lord John De Verdon. A provincial Chapter 
was held here in 1282. This Convent with fovr acres of land 
and a park was given in the 35th of Henry VIII to James 
Brandon.§ 

The Convent o>f Ardfert, in Kerry^ was founded in 
1253 by Thomas, Lord of Kerry, for Conventuals. In the 
35th of Henry VIII this Convent became a ruin. 

The Convent of Kildare was erected by Lord William 
De Vesey in 1260 and was completed by Gerald Fitz-Mauricej 
Lord Offaley. The reFormation of the Strict Observants was 
received here in 1520. A grant was made of this Convent in 
the 3.4th of Henry VIII to Daniel Sutton.|| 

* Aid Gen, f Wadding, Annal. Min. t Aud. Gen. § Id. || Ohief Remen. 



412 

The Ck)NV£NT of Clahe, in the County of Kildare, was 
founded in 1260 by Gerald Fitz-Maurice, Lord Ofialey.— 
A provincial Chapter was held here in 1346 and in the 24th 
of Henry VIII it was given to Robert Eustace and John 
Trevors at the annual rent of 2s. 4d. 

Thb Covvbmt of Armagh had for its founder Patrick 
ScsLnlan, Archbishop of Armagh^ in 1263 and in 1518 it was 
reformed by the Observants. In the sixteenth century it be- 
came involved in the general confiscation. 

Thb Convent of Clonmel was founded in 1269 by Otbo 
De Grandison for Conventuals and was reformed by the Ob* 
servants in 1536.* Robert Travers was the last Guardian, 
when in the 34th of Henry VIII a moiety consisting of four 
houses and twenty acres of land was granted to the Sovereign 
and covmionalty of Clonmel, the other moiety was given tp 
James, Earl of Ormond.f 

The Convent of Nen agh, in the County of Tipperary, was 
erected in the reign of Henry III by the Butler family* A 
provincial Chapter was held here in 1344 and in the 30th of 
Henry VIII, it was granted to Robert CoUon. 

The Convent of Wicelow was founded in the reign of 
Henry HI by the O'Byrnes and OTooles. Dermod O'Moore 
was the last Guardian, when in the 17th of Elizabeth, it was 
consigned to Henry Harrington at a trifling fine.j: 

The Convent of Teim, in the County of Meath, was 
founded by the family of Plunket. The Strict Observants 
had been here in 1325. This Convent, in the 34th of Henry 
VIII, was granted to John Wakely at a rent of 2s. 10d.§ 

The Convent of Clare--Galwat, in the Barony of Clare, 
County of Galway, wns founded by John De Cc^an, in the 
year 1290. Thomas, Lord Athenry, was one of its most mu** 
nificent benefactors. In the 33rd of Henry VIII, it was con- 
fiscated to the crown. 

• Wadding, Annal. Min. t Aud. Gen. U<2. ild. 



413 

The Convbkt op Buttevant, in the County of Cork, was 
erected by David Oge Barry, Lord Buttevant in 1290. In 
1545 it was confiscated to the crown. 

The Convent op Galway, was founded in St. Stephen's 
Island, beyond the north gate of the town, by Sir William 
De Burgo, A.D. 1296.* This Convent continued for many 
years the usual cemetry of that and of many other noble 
families. Provincial chapters had been held here in the years 
1470, 1522 and 1562. In the reign of Elizabeth it became 
inyolyed in the general wreck and reverted to the crown. 

The Content op iGrALBALLY, in the County of Limerick, 
was founded by the O'Brian family at the close of the thir* 
teenth century. In the 35th of Henry VIII, it was given to 
John of Desmond. 

The Convent op Killeigh, in the King's County, was 
erected by the O'Conors, in the reign of Edward I. This 
Convent was given in 1542 to John Allee. 

The Convent op Ross, in the County of Wexford, was 
founded by Sir John Bevereux in the reign of Edward I. — 
Among other benefactions, the founder granted to this Con- 
vent a certain duty on all ships coming into the port of Ross. 
A provincial Cluster was held here in 1318. In 1540^ this 
Convent was suppressed and granted to James, Earl of Or* 
mond-t 

CONVENTS OP THE AU6U8TINIAN ORDEE FOUNDED IN THE 
THIRTEENTH CENTURY. 

The Convent op the Holy Trinity, in Dublin, wag 
founded for Friars of the Order of St Augustin and on the 
site where Crow*8treet now stands, by a member of the family 
of Talbot, A.D. 1259. This Convent was a general college 
for the brethren of that Institute in Ireland. In the 34th of 

* Waddiog.— Lodge, vol. II. t Harris' tab. 



414 

Henry VIII, it was granted together with ten houses, three 
orchards and ten gardens in the parish of 8t Andrew; four 
acres and a park of six acres near College-green; two houses 
and gardens in Patrick-street; three houses and three gardens 
in the parish of St. Michan and ninety- thite acres in Tobber- 
boyne for ever, to Walter Tyrrel, at the annual rent of 6s. 
Irish.* 

The Convent of Tipperary was founded for Augustinians 
in the reign of Henry III. Donatus O'Quirk was the last 
Prior and in the 31st of Henry VIII, this Convent with 
twenty-three houses, ninety-two acres and a mill in Tippe- 
rary was given to Dermod Ryan, at the yearly rent of Sd.f 

The Convent op Cork, now called the Red Abbey, on 
the south side of the city, was erected in the reign of Ed-> 
ward I. In the 19th of Elizabeth, a grant was made of this 
Abbey with sixteen houses and gardens, to Cormac Teige 
Mac Carthy, at an annual rent of 16s. 8d.j: 

The Convent of Limerick, situated near Quay-lane, was 
founded in the thirteenth century, by O'Brian, a descendant 
of the Kings of Thomond. The Prior of this house had the 
first voice in the election of the Mayor, batli& and other 
officers in the City of Limerick. Stephen Sexton was the last 
Prior in 1594, when the commissioners seised on eighteen 
houses, sixteen gardens, eighty-six acres and the Rectory 
of the Church of St. John in the suburbs, parcel of the pos- 
sessions; these with various other property were afterwards 
annexed to the crown.§ 

The Convent of Drogheda was founded in the reign of 
Edward I and was afterwards repaired by the family of Bran- 
don. A provincial Chapter was held here in 1359. In the 
33rd of Henry VIII, this Convent with its appurtenances was 
granted to the Mayor and burgesses of Drogheda.|| 

The Convent of Clonmines, in the County of Wexford^ 

* Aud G«n. t !<)• t Chief Remem, $ Inqutsit. Ann. || Harris* UK 



415 

was founded by the family of Kavanagh in the reign of Ed- 
ward ly but was considerably enlarged and beautified by 
Nicholas Fitz-Nicholas in 1385. This Convent afterwards 
passed into the hands of the Dominicans, but in the fifteenth 
century was repossessed by the Augustinians. Nicholas 
Wadding was the last Prior, and in the 35th of Henry VIII, 
this establishment with six messuages, twenty-six acres and 
the Dominican Gonyent of Rossbercon was granted for ever, 
in capite, to John Parker at the annual rent of 2s. 4d. Irish.* 
Thb Comtbnt op Dunoaryan had Thomas, Lord Offaly 
for its founder, in 1295. The family of Magrath and the 
O'Briens of Cummeragh were among its principal bene- 
factors. In the 37th of Elizabeth, it was granted with sixty- 
two acres in the vicinity of Dungarvan, and various other 
property to Roger Dalton.t 

CONVENTS OF THE CARMELITE ORDER FOUNDED IN THE 
THIRTEENTH CENTURY. 

The Convent of Dublin (White Friars), in the south sub- 
burbs of the City, was founded by Sir Robert Bagot, Chief 
Justice of the King's Bench, in 1274, on a lot of ground 
which he purchased from the Abbey of Baltinglass. Pro* 
vincial chapters had been held here in the years 1320 and 
1323; and in 1333 a parliament had been convened in the 
great hall of this Convent. Among its benefactors were Rich- 
ard II, Henry IV and Henry VI, from the last of whom this 
house obtained a grant of 100s. annually, to be paid out of 
the customs of the City of Dublin. William Kelly was the 
last Prior, and in the 34th of Henry VIII, this Convent with 
eleven acres, nine houses, gardens and orchards, was granted 
to Nicholas Stanihurst, at the annual rent of 2s. 6d. It was 
afterwards conceded by Elizabeth to Francis Aungier, created 
Baron of Longford, in June 16214 

• Aud. Gen. f Id. t Lodge, vol. IV. 



416 

The Comvbnt of Leighlin Bridge was fomided for Car-* 
melites by one of the Carews about the end of the reign of 
Henry III. Edward III and Richard II were among its 
most munificent benefactors. In the 36th of Henry VIII, 
this Convent was annexed to the crown, and was afterwards 
converted into a fort, in which a regular garrisson had been 
stationed.* 

The CoNVBivT op Ardeb, in the County of Louth, was 
founded by Ralph Peppard in the reign of Edward I. Pro-- 
vincial chapters had been held here in the years 1315, 1320 
and 1325. Two provincial Synods had been convened here, 
the last of which was held in 1504. In the 31st of Henry 
VIII, this Convent with eleven messuages, eight gardens; 
two parks, a mill and a water-course, was annexed to tiie 
crown.f 

The Convent of Drogheda, on the Meath side of the 
river, was erected for Carmelites by the inhabitants of Drog- 
heda in the reign of Edward L It obtained several priviU 
eges from Edward III and particularly from the Parliament 
of 1468. In the 33rd of Henry VIII, it was confiscated and 
reverted to the crown. 

The Convent op Galway was founded by the fiimily of 
Burgh. This Convent was confiscated in the same Inquisi- 
tion with that of Drogheda. 

The Convent of Ballynamall, in the County of Mayo, 
derived its foundation from the family of Prendergast Its 
last Prior was Donatus O'Gormaly, when in the 34th of 
Henry VIII, it was granted with two quarters of land and a 
water-mill to Sir John King.j: 

The Convent of Rathmullin, in the County of Donegal, 
was founded for Carmelites in the reign of Edward I. In 
the time of Henry VIII it merged into the general confisca- 
tions. 

* Hooker's Notes. f Chief Reroem. | Harris' tab. 



417 

Thb Conybnt op Castle Ltons, in the County of Cork, 
was founded for Carmelites by the Barry family. In the 3rd 
of Elizabeth this Convent was annexed to the crown. 

Thb Cokvbnt of Kildarb was erected for CarmeUtes in 
the year 1290 by William De Vescy. This Convent was a 
general sembary for the Order in Ireland, and among its 
teachers may be noticed the learned David O'Buge, usually 
styled in the annals of this period, ''the burning light, the 
mirror and <»iiament of his country."* In 1540, it became 
involved in the general wreck. 

The Conybbt of Thublbs, in the County of Tipperary, 
was founded for Carmelites by the Butler family about the 
dose of the thirteenth century. The last Prior was Donatus 
O'Houleghan and in the 31st of Henry VIII, this Convent 
vrith fifteen acres of land, five gardens and the Priory of 
Athassel, was granted to Thomas Earl of Ormond, to hold 
in capite, at a yearly rent. In 1563, Elizabeth confirmed the 
same, but remitted the reserved rentf 

«S«e C«at. XIV. chtp. HI. t Lodge, vol. II. 



3 a 



CHAFFER III- 

Religious and Literary Characters of the Thirteenth Cett- 
turt^ General Observations. 

Marian OXaghnan^ Archbishop of Tuam and an eminent 
canonist, has been deservedly ranked by our annalists among 
the ecclesiastical writers of the thirteenth century. In 1238, 
he was elected by the Chapter of Tuam as successor to the 
Archbishop Felix O'Ruaden and immediately after proceeded 
to Rome, where his election was confirmed by Gregory IX 
and he was invested with the pallium. Before this period 
Marian undertook a journey to Jerusalem and spent some 
years in visiting the several remarkable places recorded in 
holy writ. Having departed from Jerusalem he proceeded 
through the interior of Palestine, and collected a variety of 
materials calculated to throw light on many of the difficult 
historical passages of the sacred Scriptures. An accurate 
detail of this journey, together with his own elucidations, 
had been afterwards published by Marian.''^ He died at 
Athlone on the 24th of December, A.D. 1249. 

The Author of the Annals of Innisfallen flourished in the 
year 1216. It is indeed singular that the name of this writer 
has not been preserved, while at the same time it must be 
admitted that the work itself forms one of the most valuable 
remnants of our ancient national literature. The annalist 
commences with the history of the creation and in a brief, 
perspicuous manner conducts his reader down to the year of 
the Christian era 430. From that period, he confines him- 
self particularly to the annals of Ireland, of which he takes 

• Ware Writers. 



419 

an accurate comprehensive view and continues the work re- 
gularly to his own time. It was afterwards brought down to 
the year 1320 by another anonymous author.* 

Pbter, styled Hibernicus, a distinguished philosopher, 
theologian and canonist, after having devoted many years to 
the advancement of literature in his own country, retired at 
length to the Continent where he embraced the Franciscan 
Institute and became an eminent professor.f He taught 
philosophy at Naples in 1240 and among the number of his 
pupils we feel particular pleasure in noticing the name of the 
great St. Thomas Aquinas, j: His virtues as well as his learn- 
ing had rendered him a great favourite with the Emperor 
Frederic II, by whom he was earnestly invited to Naples, 
immediately after the celebrated schools of that City had 
been re-established. While Peter had been employed in de- 
livering lectures at Naples, a number of learned disquisitions 
on both philosophical and scriptural subjects proceeded from 
his pen. These, it is conjectured, may still be found among 
the manuscript copies in the libraries and archives of that 
City. His Quodlibeta Theologica has been published; from 
which alone an estimate may be formed of the talents and 
erudition of this distinguished Irishman. 

GoTOFRiD, as the writers of the Bibliotheque of the Do- 
minican Order inform us, was a native of the City of Water- 
ford and flourished in the thirteenth century.^ He was a 
member of that Order and was exceedingly well versed in the 
Hebrew, Greek, Latin, French and Arabick languages. For 
the purpose of acquiring a competent knowledge of the Ara- 
bic, he travelled into the east and spent several years in 
digesting its various dialects and in exploring those literary 
remains of antiquity, which lie scattered along the vast and 
desolate plains of Syria, Asia Minor and Palestine. On his 

• Ware Writera. t Wadding ad A. 1270. t Pet. de Vincis Lib. III. 

$Tom. 1. p. Af)7. 



420 

return to hift native country, Gotofrid translated the follow- 
ing works from the Latuiy Greek and Arabick into French: 
Daretis Phrygii Liber De Bello TrojAno.— Eutropii Roma* 
na Hifttoriak^-Arifttotdis ad Alexandiem liber, qui dicitur 
Secretum Secretonimy Seu de Regimine Regum. — Libel^ 
lus Mortalitatum* He has likewise written an expoeiticm of 
the articles of fitith and the Lord's prayer, a collection of 
sermons and a treatise styled Eleucidarius; th^ authorship 
of which has pvexk rise to much contiDversy among tile 
learned; some having ascribed it to St Anslem and others to 
Honorius of Autqn,* 

This Author of the Amials of Multifemam flouiished 
about the middle of the thirteenth century. Th^se invaluable 
annals have survived the wreck, whUe the name of the au* 
tbor has unfortunately perished. They commence with the 
year of Christ 4& and are brought down to the year 1274. — 
Ware, an excellent authority on subjects of this description, 
having first examined the antiquity of the manuscript cha* 
racter and afterwards comparing it with certain chronolc^cal 
and other circumstances, comes at length to a decision that 
the author of these Annals must have been Stephen of 
Exeter, It may, however, be advanced, as a very probable 
conjecture, that these Annals had not been the work of an in-* 
dividual; that, on the contrary, they had been the joint 
production of many writers. The andent literary monastic 
system, anterior to the invention of printing and the un* 
wearied solicitude which these religious had evinced in aug- 
menting and perpetuating their conventual archives serve, in 
no small degree, to confirm the probability of this opinion. 

Thomas Palmer, usually styled Thomas Hibernicus, was 
bom at Palmerstown in the County of Kildare, and flourished 
about the year 1269. Owing to the wreck of Uterature in his 
own country, Thomas, when young, had formed the deter^ 

* Biblioth. Dom. 



421 

minatioa of removing to Park; in the schools of which City 
he studied for seyeral years and at length became entitled to 
the degree of a Doctor (Utriusque Juris). Wadding, the 
learned author of the ^'Annales Minonim/' maintains that 
Thomas Hibemicus had been a member of the Franciscan 
Institute;* while the Dominicans with equal zeal but Mrith 
still less authority have thought proper to rank him in the 
catalogue of their own writers^f This discrepancy of opinion, 
it may be presumed, had at length brought forth that just 
Cttisure of the critical authors of the Bibliotheque Dominir 
que, by which these writers, upon fair historical grounds, 
condemn not less the assertion of their own body than that 
of Wadding and very justly conclude that the writer Thomas 
Hibemicus was a Fellow of the Sorbonne, of distinguished 
eminence in that University and the author of many learned 
works4 Thomas Palmer has written: Flores Doctorum 
pene Omnium, qui tum in Theologia, turn in Philosophia 
hactenus claruerunt — ^Antwerp, 1680,' octavo. Flores Bibli* 
cos. — Antwerp, 1568. Promptuarium Morale SacrsB Scrip- 
turffi, — Published by Wadding at Rome, in 1624, out of a 
manuscript in the AracsBli Library. De Christiana Religione. 
< — Lib. I. De Illusionibus Deemonum. — Lib. I. De Tenta* 
tione Diaboli. — Lib. I. De Remediis Vitiorum. — Lib. I.§ — 
This learned writer died at Aquila in Naples, about the close 
of the thirteenth centuiy. 

Having placed before the reader a fair and circumstantial 
outline of the principal ecclesiastical events of the thirteenth 
century, it remains for him to determine what measure of be* 
nefit the Church of Ireland has derived from that long* 
boasted reformation of discipline and morality which Henry 
II and his accredited agents had so confidently anticipated. 

It must, indeed, be admitted, that among the number of 

• Tera. IV. ad A. 1629. t Burke Uib. Dom. chap. XV. t Tom. I, p. 744. 
fWare Writers. 



422 

those English ecclesiastics, who had^ at this period, been 
promoted to church-dignities in this country, there were not 
a few, who for learning as well as for sterling virtue, de- 
serve to have been placed on honourable record; nevertheless 
when the plain historical facts themselves are dispassionately 
considered, it requires nothing more than ordinary discern- 
ment to arrive at the proper conclusion. 

We have set out on the acknowledged principle, that eccle- 
siastics of all other description of men in society, should be 
completely divested both of over-grown wealth and of every 
participation of civil or state authority. With great justice 
this principle may be advanced as an axiom. It is the un- 
equivocal language of common reason: it is certainly sup- 
ported by the authority of the Christian Founder and by the 
doctrine and example of His apostles. Scarcely, however, 
had an English clergyman arrived in Ireland, when some 
civil office of trust and emolument had been placed in his 
hands. One became a Lord Treasurer, another a Chancel- 
lor and many of them had been constituted the Justiciaries 
or Chief Governors of the country. Whether this singular 
mode of proceeding could tend to soothe the feelings of an 
exaspei-ated people or to exalt the principles of an humble 
Gospel, are questions which shall be left to the discretion of 
the reader himself. 

It is, however, certain that the saintly and illustrious men, 
who had guided the helm of the Church of Ireland during 
the greater portion of the previous century, had thought 
proper to adopt a widely different and more consistent 
course. St. Malachy, the leading father, the great moral 
reformer of the twelfth century, had neither wealth or politi- 
cal station at his command. St. Laurence OToole lived in 
greater poverty and seclusion than any member of the in- 
stitute attached to his cathedral. Christian the Legate, 
Gelasius the Primate, Catholicus of Tuam knew nothing 
about opulence or civil power; in fact these men looked 



423 

down on secular concerns — on the wealth and pride of the 
world as altogether beneath the sphere of their grand and 
exalted vocation. Hence it is^ that the virtues of many of 
them have been canonized; and for the same reason Malachy, 
Laurence and other Irish ecclesiastics of the twelfth century 
had been fully competent to effect a renovation of both 
morals and discipUne without the aid of any foreign eccle- 
siastic whatever. 

Archbishop Comin, the Prelates of Meath and Ossory, and 
other English ecclesiastics have^ it is true^ an undoubted 
claim on the gratitude of Irishmen. The parish churches, 
the cathedrals and the numerous splendid monasteries, which 
they either founded or eodowed, are to this day, even in their 
very ruins, so many triumphant testimonials of their piety 
and pastoral solicitude. It must, however, be a subject 
of deep regret, that in their zeal for religious institutions, 
these great men had not evinced a more earnest desire for 
perpetuating the literary system of the ancient monastic 
foundations of Ireland and particularly that of the Colum- 
bian Order. The basis of these inimitable institutions had 
been laid in Tours, Lerins and other parts of the Continent, 
long before the days of our illustrious Apostle, St. Patrick. 
By him were they introduced into Ireland and among their 
various but sublime constitutions, that of universal gratuitous 
education stood pre-eminently conspicuous. Every monas- 
tery was, in fact, a free public seminary; and while virtue 
had been practised in the cloister, its halls of literature were 
thrown open for the child of genius — the distant stranger as 
well as the native student met a kind and a welcome recep- 
tion within the hospitable walls of the ancient Irish monastic 
establishment. Nor should these remarks be construed into 
a censure on those other excellent religious institutions which, 
during the thirteenth century, had been so laudably intro- 
duced into this country. These learned bodies were, at this 
period, making their way rapidly over Europe; and it will 



424 

be found, that in future ages, when the storm raged loud and 
iiirious, when terror and death stalked into the sanctuary^ 
they were the men, who martyrs-like, braved the danger and 
m%df sacrifices the most noble and heroic in defence of the 
religion of their country and their fathers. The progress of 
religion, therefore, was during the thirteenth century at- 
taided with some peculiar advantages, its deficiency on the 
score of public gratuitous education and on other matters of 
general utility will be better illustrated by subsequent events, 
and may form the subject of some future observations. 



APPENDIX I. 

Arehbhhc^ U$het^» ^^ Diseourse/' an the Religion anciently profe$$€d 
by the Irithj^'' analyzed and routed. 

Nothing can perhaps more forcibly exhibit the perversity of the human 
mind than its constant inclination to oppugn troths already incontestibly 
established and which, in many instances, had become even self-evident. 
There is scarcely a principle in either natural or revealed religion that 
has not at some period been questioned. In modern times, we find 
Berkley denying the existence of matter and the infallibility of his own 
senses; while among the ancient philosophers, Ph3rrrus raised up the 
doctrine of a general doubt; he doubted of every thing, even of his own 
existence. Should we be inclined to find out a third character for the 
purpose of forming a trio, Doctor James Usher, Protestant Archbishop 
of Armagh, might indeed with great propriety be selected. Will it be 
believed that this man, celebrated for antiquarian research and for 
accuracy likewise, whenever the subject seemed not to clash with his 
own temporal interest, had actually undertaken to maintain, that the 
religious doctrines of the ancient Irish had been in most respects per- 
fectly similar to those professed by protestants at the present day? — 
that neither St. Patrick or any one of the ancient Fathers of the Irish 
Church had ever recognized such a doctrine as the Supremacy of the 
Roman Pontiff, the sacrifice of the Mass, Purgatory, the invocation of 
Saints and other tenets, now and at all times so stedfastly embraced by 
catholics; and that of course the Christian religion must have been, at 
some period antecedent to the sixteenth century, corrupted in this 
country. Ledwich, who denied the existence of St. Patrick himself, 
may have some claim to our pity, he woe an illiterate bigoty Usher on 
the contrary had been deeply read in the antiquities of our country, and 
hence the bigotry which has tarnished his character, so far from being 
palliated on the score of ignorance, has acquired even an additional hue, 
from the downright determined malice with which it must have been ac- 
companied. His intolerance during the reign of James I is well known 
to every one acquainted with the history of that period; when however 

* London edition, 1^1, in Marsh's Library. 

3h 



426 

he had found, that catholicity was not to be root«d out of Ireland by 
the sword, he then had recourse to tius last wretched expedient; one 
which in all probability he adopted not so much from a hope of success- 
ful proselytism as from a desire to wound the feelings of the people, by 
misrepresenting and maligning the religion of their forefathers. We 
shall, however, in the subsequent sheets, endeavour to follow the argu- 
ments of this singular polemic; observing at the same time, that it ia 
with great reluctance we devote any portion of our time or paper in at- 
tempting to illustrate a subject, which is as solidly established as any 
fact recorded in history, and which might with all propriety be pro- 
nounced self-evident. Nor need we undertalte the task of analysng hia 
arguments; all this has been done, and indeed with great precision, hy 
his favourite admirer, Harris. 

There are, however, one or two principles, which by way of prelim- 
inary, we shall take the liberty of examining. The first of these refers 
to the mission and episcopal jurisdiction of St. Patrick. Thai this our 
national Apostie had derived his mission and received his jurisdiction 
from the Bishop of Rome, is a fact which Usher himself does not deny.. 
Nevertheless to place it beyond a doubt, we may be permitted to quote 
a few unquestionable authorities. In the fourth life of St. Patrick, con- 
tained in Colgan^s << Trias Thaumaturge," we read: — ^^^WhoreSare St^ 
Germanus sent the blessed Patrick to Rome, that with the permissioi^ 
of the Bishop of the Apostolic See he might go forth to preach, for order 
so requireth. But Patrick having arrived at Rome was most honourably 
received by the holy P<^, Celestine, and the relics of saints having 
been delivered to him he was sent into Ireland by Pope Celestine." — 
Again, Eric in his life of St. Germain writes : — ^< Germain directed Pat- 
rick to the holy Celestine, Pope of the City of Rome, by means of 
Segetius, his priest, who was to give a testiooony of ecclesiastacal pro^ 
bity for this most excellent man before the holy See ; and having in its 
judgment been approved of, .being supported by its autiiority and 
strengthened by its benediction, he repaired to the regions of Ireland." 
Nennius also states: — '^Ue (Patrick) is sent by Celestine, Po)>e of 
Rome, to convert the Scots (liish) to the faith of Christ" To these 
might be superadded an host of other aathorities, did the limits of this 
appendix permit, or were it in ajiy manner necessary. Hence it is evi- 
dent, that the source whence St. Patrick had derived his ecclesiastical 
jurisdiction was the head of the Church in the Apostolic See, the Bishop 
of Rome. Hence also it is evident, that the discipline and tenets of 
Catholic faith, professed and taught by Pope Celestine, were and must 
have been ideulically the same as those which Patrick had been sent to 



427 

aanouice to the Irish nation; a comminion which^ as we have seen, he 
afterwards ezecoted with sach anasing triamphant success. Now will 
any dlspassiooate man venture to assert, that this great and saintly 
Apostle, after having been specially sent by Pope Celestine to preach 
certain doctrines to the Irish, had, on his landing in the country, 
wrecklessly renounced all his professions and set about teaching a creed 
altogether diflferent from that which he had received at the hands of 
those by whom he had been originally commissioned? An act of this 
description would argue nothing less than downright insanity — an in- 
stance of the kind is not to be found in the whole range of history — an 
instance of the kind has never occurred. With justice, therefore, we 
oonclode that^the very same principles of belief, which had been em- 
braced and taught by Pope Celestine at Rome, were in like manner in* 
cnloated by St. Patrick, when he had entered on his mission among the 
inhabitants of this country. Now either Pope Celestine believed in the 
tenets of the Catholic fsith, as they are at this day taught, or he did 
not^-either he believed in the sacrifice of the Mass, in private sacra« 
mental Confession, in Purgatory, in the Invocation of Saints, Ac., or he 
did not; if he did, then it follovrs that St Patrick must ui like manner 
have believed in them, and must have taught all these doctrines to our 
forefothers; then we see in one view what had been the religion of Ire- 
land in the fifth century; bat should it by any possibility be asserted that 
Pope Celestine knew nothing about these doctrines, practised none of 
these doctrines, taught none of these doctrines: the man who would 
attempt to make such a ridiculous assertion, becomes at oAce a public 
object of scorn — all the monuments of antiquity are against hiu—- he 
migirt as well commence forthwith aod reject all historical evidence ; to 
act with consistency he should taka his proper position and join the 
ranlcs of Phyrroniam. Snch an assertion, indeed, has never been ad- 
vanced ; therefore we again conclude, that the tenets of the Catholic 
Caitb, as they are at this day held, were the very identical doctrines 
which had been taught to ouf forefathers by the great Apostle of the 
Irish nation when he came aoiongst them and converted them to the 
Christian &ith in the year 482. 

We shall in the next place direct the attention of the reader to anothes 
pouit equally true and equally interesting; we allude to that profound, 
unshaken veneration which tbe ancient Irish had at ail times evinced, 
towards every religious tenet delivered to them by their beloved Apostle, 
There never was in any part ol the Christian world a people who had 
^nced a more reverential attachment to whatever bad been banded 
down to them by their Apostle, than the ancient Irish. Should this 



428 

truth require any Uluatration, iEinumerable instances could be adduced. 
Look, for example, to the Paachal controversy. Here is a question that 
has no connection whatever with Catholic faith ; a mere matter of dis- 
cipline; and yet before it could be settled — before the Alexandrine 
Cycle could be introduced, see what determined opposition had been 
raised against it, what an uproar had been created from one extremity 
of the Icingdom to the other. Yet in raising this outcry, what argument 
had they? Simply this one, that their ancient Paschal Cycle was that 
which they had received from St. Patrick, that whatever correq>onded 
not with it was a mere novelty, and could not, according to the judg- 
ment of this proverbially tenacious people, be admitted as a substitute. 
But if instead of discipline, which may and does vary, an attempt had 
been made to corrupt the faith of the country, if some dogmatizer had 
started up and proposed a new tenet of belief, the reception which such 
a character would meet with may be readily anticipated. If they had 
raised such a reclamation on the score of discipline, what would they 
not have done had the faith itself been in danger? 
• Having proceeded thus far with these preliminary principles, let us 
now direct our attention to the arguments by which Doctor Usher en- 
deavours to maintain that the creed of the ancient Irish was totally dis- 
tinct from that of their Catholic successors at the present day. For the 
purpose of establishing this singular proposition the Archbishop has 
made a favourite selection from among the several articles of Catholic 
&ith, he has also condescended to take notice of our discipline. Were 
we to believe this disinterested theologian, the ancient Irish knew no- 
thing whatever about the Supremacy of the Bishop of Rome, or of the 
sacrifice of the Mass, or of the real presence of Christ in the sacra- 
ment of the Eucharist — or of prayers for the dead— or of the invocation 
of Saints — or of images or reUcs — moreover the use of Chrism was 
never practised amongst them, every one was allowed to read the 
Scriptures and the clergy (quotes the Doctor) were tolerated to marry. 
This without doubt) is a bold, a commanding position; but how, it 
may be asked, does he endeavour to maintain it. He attempts to main- 
tain it by garbled, isolated extracts taken generally from the mystical 
works of some few of our ancient Irish writers, putting his own con- 
struction thereon^ and making it, in despite even of common sense, ex- 
actly answer his own purpose, while at the same time he industriously 
takes care to pass over in silence those clear, conclusive authorities, 
which would at once serve to point out to the reader what had been in 
reality the fetith as well as the practice of the ancient Church of Ireland. 
**l shall quote,^^ he observes, << ancient writers, by which. we must 



429 

judge whether of both sides hath departed from the religion of our an- 
cettor*.'*^^ Let us therefore, patiently and respectfully attend to his 
quotations. 

On the Supremacy of the Pope.— In treating on this subject 
the Archbishop refers to two authorities, namely, to Sedulius and 
Claudius.t Sedulius, an Irish ecclesiastic of the ninth century, in his 
commentary on this passage of Isaiah '< Behold I lay a stone in Sion 
for a foundation," observes, <^ It is certain that by the stone Christ is 
signified." Claudius thus expounds the passage: ''On this rock I will 
build my Church." That is, '< upon Christ our Saviour, who granted 
unto Peter, his faithful lover and confessor, the participation of his 
own name ; that from Petra (the rock) he should be called Peter." — 
From these passages the Doctor concludes that both Sedulius and 
Claudius had taught that the foundation stone laid in Sion and the rock 
on which the Church was built is Christ. But, pray, what Catholic 
denies it ? That Christ Jesus is the rock, the great comer stone on 
which the whole edifice rests, is a truth inculcated by the Catholic 
Church; but does it follow from this that Christ, the invisible comer 
stone, or if you will, the invisible head, could not or has not appointed 
a visible substitute ; a visible head to govern his Church on earth, and 
without which visible head the house would soon become divided against 
itself: presenting nothing less than an indiscriminate scene of confusion, 
a crumbling tottering ruin. Witness, for example, the various sectaries 
that have separated from this head ; having no centre of unity, they 
soon became divided among themselves, until at length you find even 
within the limits of one small island, almost as many religions as there 
are inhabitants in the country. The necessity of this visible authority 
and the actual appointment of this authority were truths of which 
Claudius had been perfectly convinced, and hence he observes that 
'' Christ our Saviour granted (not unto John or Thomas or James) but 
unto Peter, his faithful lover and confessor, the participation of his own 

* Epistle to the Discourse, edition ia Marsh's library. 

t There is no sufficient authority for supposmg that Claudius was an Irishman. — 
The only grounds on which that supposition rests, is the term ScoH, contained in 
the heading of the pre&ce to his Commentary on St. Matthew : '* Claudu Scoti 
Fresbyteri ad Justum." This is not, however, considered by antiquarians to have 
been the correct text. Mabillon quoting this preface of Claudius omits the word 
&ofi and has merely Claudius peceator ; while L'abbe maintains that the author of 
both the preface and Commentaries was Claudius of Turin, who accordmg to all 
authorities had been a Sptmaid. — See Divent. in Bellarraio* De Scrip. Tom. I. — 
Also Flury, Hist. £ccL L. 48—7. 



430 

name.^^ Or aa it is elsewhere expressed, the participation of Ids own 
power, in lliesc words: <<And I will give onto yoa the keys of the 
kingdom of Heaven, whatever you bind on earth shall be boand in 
heaven and whatever yoa loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven/^ — 
Had Claudias said that Christ never granted unto Peter a participation 
in his name, or a participation of his authority, then indeed there 
might have been just grounds for an objection. This commentator, 
however, says quite the contrary. It is, therefore, most clear and cer- 
tain that neither Sedulins or Claudius had ever professed or inculcated 
any other doctrine, relative to the supremacy of St. Peter and bis suc- 
cessors, except that which had been handed down from the days of the 
apostles and believed in all ages and nations with such reverence and 
fidelity by the CathoUc Church. 

The next anthonty, by which the Archbishop endeavours to prove 
that the ancient Irish had been unacquainted with the doctrine of St. 
Peter^s supremacy, is a solitary quotation taken from a hymn written 
by St. Secundinus, in honour of St Patrick, In a part of the hymn 
are these words : <' He (Patrick) is constant In the fear of God and im- 
moveable in the faith, upon whom the Church is builded as upon Peter^ 
whose apostleship also he hath obtained from God, and the gates of 
hell shall not prevail against him.** This quotation contains three sub- 
jects for panegyrism : first, the nature of the apostleship which St 
Patrick received; secondly, the stability of this apostleship; and 
thirdly, the consequences of that stability. As to the apostleship itself, 
we are informed that it was that of St Peter, "whose apostlesiilp also 
he hath obtained** (of course) from God. But how or through what 
medium had this apostleship of Peter been conmiunicated to Patrick ? 
Was it not by his having received ordination in a Church holding com- 
munion with the successor of Peter and of having received his mission- 
ary jurisdiction from the hands of St Peter*s successor? Uuquestlon^ 
ably it was; and for this very same substantial reason, Patrick bad re- 
course to the chair of Peter, before be had ever entered on the arduoua 
duties for which heaven designed him — before he had ever ventured to 
embark on the mission of Ireland. 

In this manner it was that the blessed Patrick, already invited by an 
heavenly call, had obtained the apostleship of Peter; from this aposto- 
lic chair he never separated, for "he was immoveable in the fiedth,*' 
with this apostolic chair he continued in constant communion; he be- 
came as it were incorporated with it, and hence the venerable author 
of the hymn in his peculiar poetic diction observes^ thai "upon him the 
Church is builded as upon Peter, and the gates of hell shall not prevail 



431 

against bim/' This extract from the hymn of Secundinas cannot, 
therefore, be of any service to the cause of the Archbishop, on the con- 
trary it militates powerfully against him. Let us suppose that Patrick 
had not received his ordination or his jurisdiction from Pope Celestine, 
but that be had recourse for these essentials to some Arian bishop ; in 
that case would he be considered by the learned author of the hymn as 
having i obtained the apostleship of Peter? He certainly would not: 
and for this capital reason, that the source to which he applied had al- 
ready been separated from the chair of Peter; because the Arian by 
bis heresy as well as by his schism had already cut himself off from all 
communion wiUi the apostolic chair. Such being the case, the un- 
doubted tact, what then becomes of the priestly jurisdiction of Arch- 
bishop Usher? Has he the apostleship of Peter? The Arian had it 
not, because he separated himself from it — the Archbishop has done 
the same; let us therefore leave him in his proper company — let us link 
the two together and continue to offer some further observations on the 
subject which is still under discussion. 

The quotations already advanced are those by which our great anti- 
quarian has endeavoured to prove that the doctrine of St. Peter's Su- 
premacy was a thing altogether unlcnown to and never professed by the 
ancient Church of Ireland; the same Prelate, however, has industriously 
and very un£BLirly secluded altogether from the view of his reader^ 
the avowed and unequivocal testimony of some of the brightest lumi- 
naries of the Irish Church — ^he has designedly passed over many of the 
public acts of this same Church, connected with that doctrine, and has 
treated with the same indifference some of the most interesting Canons 
of her ancient national Synods. Columbanus, who flourished in the 
sixth century, and whose learning and sanctity had contributed to shed 
a new radiance around the glory of that age, may, with great justice, 
be admitted as a competent witness on the subject now before as. In 
his fourth Epistie to Pope Boniface, this Father of the Irish Church 
thus addresses the Supreme Pontiff. " To the most lovely of all Europe 
— to the Head of all the Churches — ^to the beloved Father — ^to the exalted 
Prelate — ^to the Pastor of Pastors, ±cJ*^ In the body of the letter he 
proceeds to say: — " For we Irish are disciples of St. Peter and of St. 
Paul and of all the divinely inspired canonical writers, adhering con- 
stantiy to the Evangelical and Apostolical doctrine. Amongst us nei- 
ther Jew, heretic or schismatic can be found, but the Catholic faith on- 
altered, unshaken, precisely as we have received it from yoUf who are 
the successors of the AposUes. For as I have already said, we are at- 
tached to the chair of St. Peter, and although Rome is great and re- 



432 

Downed^ yet with us it is great and illastrious only on account of that 
apostolic chair. Through the two Apostles of Christ, you are almost 
celestial and Rome is the Head of the Churches of the worlds Here 
is straight-forward, conclusire testimony, so conclusive that it would be 
folly to employ a single syllable in attempting to illustrate it. Bat let 
us proceed to facts — ^when in the subsequent century, tbejcontroversy 
connected with the Paschal question had been carried to the utmost 
limits of excitement, and when in the national Synod of Old Leigiilin, 
the Fathers of the Irish Church could not be prevailed upon to come to 
some settled resolution on this subject, what had been the ultimate and 
decisive plan proposed by the leading Prelates of the nation and instantiy 
adopted by the whole assembly ? It was a regular appeal to the Apos- 
tolic See; a proceeding founded not only on the doctrine which they had 
received from their predecessors, but also on an express Canon ratified 
and handed down to them by St Patrick himself. This we have already 
seen when treating on the events of the seventh century, a circumstance 
which saves us the trouble of any recapitulation in this place. But to 
put the question at rest for ever, to place it beyond the bounds of all 
controversy, let us quote the Canon itself, that ancient Irish Constitu- 
tion which fifteen hundred years ago had been established by the great 
Apostle of this nation, long before either a heretic or a schismatic had 
been known in the country ; let this Canon be produced, and then the 
dispassionate reader will be enabled to Judge whether 4>r not the ancient 
Irish had believed in the supremacy of the Apostolic See. This con< 
cise but comprehensive Canon is contained in these words: <<Si quae 
qusestiones in hac insula oriautnr, ad sedem Apostolicam referantur.** If 
any questions (difficulties on religious subjects) should take place in this 
island, let them be referred to the Apostolic See.'* Or, as more fully 
expressed in a Canon copied by Usher himself from an ancient book of 
the Church of Armagh and paissed in the Synod of Patrick, Auxilius, 
Secundinus and Benignus, substantially to the following effect: <<If any 
difllcult cause should occur, which cannot be easily decided by the Irish 
prelates and the See of Armagh, we have decreed that it shall be re- 
ferred to the Apostolic See, that is, to the chair of the Apostle St. Peter, 
which hath the authority of the City of Rome.*' The doctrine of the 
spiritual authority of the Apostolic See, comprehended in this Canon, 
was stedfastly practised by the pastors of the Irish Church at all sub- 
sequent periods ; it had been confirmed by the illustrious example of our 
national Apostle himself. Had not the supreme authority of the chair 
of St Peter been an universally received doctrine, what necessity had 
Patrick for having bad recourse to Rome previously to bis entering on 



433 

the mission of Ireland? Could he not have received bis ordination and 
bis missionary powers from St. Germain of Auzerre or from St. Martin 
of Tonrs? These were Prelates of aclcnowiedged eminence and the 
Sees over which they presided had obtained an high ranlc in the Chris- 
tian Chnrchy yet we find that they were the very men who had sent oar 
Apostle to PopeCelestine, in order that from that snccessor of St. Peter^ 
he might receive his ordination together with licit powers to eater on the 
sublime enterpriie for which heaven had designed him. This self-same 
doctrine he has transmitted to his soccessors; by them has it been 
handed down with snored reverence from one generation of pastors to 
another, and althongh the sword had been drawn and the storm had 
raged anabated for centuries, nevertheless the Catholic Church of Ire- 
land has proceeded majestically in her course, never for an instant sepa- 
rating herself from the great centre of unity, or from that apostolic 
doctrine with which she had been entrusted and which flourishes at this 
day as vigorously as it ever had during the lairest and brightest epoch of 
her primitive glory. 

Thb Sacaipicb op the Mass.— -On this subject as well as on the 
resd presence of the body and blood of Christ in the sacrament of the 
Eucharist, the Archbishop appears to have been completely puzzled. — 
Compelled by the unequivocal testimony of our writers, our liturgies 
and our canons, he was obliged to admit that the ancient Irish had been 
in the constant practice of offering up the Eucharistic sacrifice, and 
that masses, termed Requiem MasseSf used to be daily celebrated. — 
Indeed so interwoven is the doctrine of the Eucharistic Sacrifice with 
the whole body of our national records, that in order to deny its prac- 
Uce, he should necessarily reject the antiquities of the country alto* 
gether. Cogitosus in his life of St. Brigid and in his beautiful descrip- 
tion of the Church of Kildare, sajrs, << there were two doors leading 
into the church; that by one door the bishop together with his clergy 
entered, for the purpose of immoMing the saered Lord* eeacrificey and 
>t||at by the other the abbess and her nuns entered, that they might en- 
joy the banquet of the body and blood of Jesue ChrietJ*^ In the ancient 
Acts of St Columbkill written by Adamnan, it is stated that when St. 
Cronan had been on a visit at the Monastery of Hy, he was directed by 
St. Columba to offer the sacrifice, or as the venerable author expresses 
it, << To make according to custom the body qf ChrietJ*^ We read in 
the ancient life of St Kieran of Saigir, that on every Christmas night, 
the Saint was accustomed to repair to the nunnery of St Cocchea, 
<< that there he might offer i^ the body of C^riit.^^ In fine, when ever 
any of these ancient Irish writers are treating on this august siibject, 

3 I 



434 

fhe terms which they invariably employ are ^'the Sacrifice of Salvatioii — 
the Sacrificial Mystery — the Mysteries of the Sacrifice/* It woald be 
an endless task, and would carry as beyond oar intended limits^ were 
we to give insertion in this place to an almost coantless mass of aoibo- 
rities which could be adduced from the ancient writers and Fathen of 
the Irish Church. The canons and liturgies to ^Hiich we shall hereafter 
refer, will form another powerful argument In support of our proposition, 
while it must be repeated ttiat Usher, unable to resist such a host of 
evidence, was compelled to acknowledge that the Sacrifice <^ the Mass 
had been a doctrine unlversiJly believed and practised fh>m the earliest 
period in the Church of Ireland. Having been thus constrained to 
make this important concession, the reader will, no doubt, be some- 
what astonished at the reckless struggle which he makes in attempting 
to extricate himself from the dilBculty; while at the same tUue he en- 
deavours to impose on his readers by pretending that it had been owiy 
a sacrifice of thanksgiving, and as such was olTered up for those happy 
souls who had been in the possession of eternal bliss, but that it had not 
been believed or practised in the ancient Irish Church a# a uteri/ice of 
pn^piHatitm, In order to establidi this sweeping propotltkm^ a fow 
isolated quotations from Adamoan's life of St Columba are most pom- 
pously produced. In one of these the writer saj's, ^that Columbklli 
caused all things to be prepared for the Bucharist, when he bad seea 
the soul of St. Brendan received by the angels.*' On another occasion, 
when the death of Colnmbanus Blehop of Leinster had oomrreA, the 
same Saint Is represented as having acted under similar religious feel- 
ings. ** For (says he) I must this day celebrate the holy mysteries of 
the Eucharist, for the reverence of that soul, which this night, being 
carried beyond the starry firmament between the choir* of ang^, as* 
cended into paradise." From these passages the good Archbishi^ 
labours hard to persuade his reader that with the ancient Irish the JBu- 
charistlc oblation was always one of thanksgiving and that it sever 
forsooth had been an offering of propitiation. But, pray, by what pro- 
cess of fair reasoning is he entitled to draw this comprehensive infer- 
ence? Where is the man, even, partially acquainted with the prioci* 
pies of Catholicity, who does not know that the Catholic Church holds 
tlie Sacrifice of the Mass to be a sacrifice both of thanksgiving and of 
propitiation? In the cases alluded to in the foregoing extracts, the 
sacrifice was certainly offered up by way of thanksgiving, but it does 
not fW>m hence follow that it had never been offered as a propitiation.— « 
On the contrary this mystical oblation had been always considered by 
the ancient Irish as propitiatory, and to demonstrate this truth we shall 



435 

bare recourse to sutb autharittes as cannot by any possibility be called 
into question. Of all the sources, whether moral or physical, by which 
the faith or discipline of any national Church can be ascertained, the 
sorest and most indisputable is to be found in the public acts of that 
Charchy that is, in the existing canons which had been passed at the 
national synods, composed of the fathers and guardians of that Chvroh. 
Taking our stand on this principle, we shall now have recourse to the 
aacieot canons of the Church of Ireland and make it appear as evident 
as the sun rolling in the heavens that the EnchariMic oblation had been 
cttuidered by the Church of Ireland not only as a sacrifice of thanks- 
giving but also of propitiation. In an ancient canon contained in 
D*Aohery*s collection^ (L. 2. cap. 80.) the Synod says: ^ The Church 
oifers for the souls of the deceased in fonr ways — for the very good the 
oblations are simply thanksgivings — for the very bad they become con- 
solations to the living — for such as were not very good the oblations are 
made in order to obtain fnU remistitm; and for those who were not 
f ery bad that their puntMkment may be rendered more tolerable,^'* Here 
we have the doctrine of the fiocharistio oblation being a propitiatory 
sacrifice in plain unequivocal terms* When it is offered up for souls 
that are very good, that are blessed and happy, it is in that case (says 
tlie canon) a sacrifice of thanksgiving; and of this description was the 
oblation of St. Colomba already noticed: should it be offered for souls 
that were very bad in the sight of heaven, even so the foithful on earth 
will derive consolation from it. But should the sacrifice be offered for 
sueh as were not very good or were not very bad, then the object of it 
is, that the ponishment to whioh these sools had been sntjected may 
be rendered more tolerable and that they may at length obtain full 
pardon* What do you call this but propitiation, and of such a charac- 
ter also, that it not only decides our present subject, but moreover es- 
tablishes in the clearest manner that the catholic doctrine of praying 
for the dead had been a tenet universally believed and practised in the 
ancient Church of Ireland. With this important Canon Usher had 
been well acquainted, why tiien has he not produced it, why has he 
eoBcealedit altogether from the view of his reader? He knew right 
well that had this public document, this solemn attestation of the Irish 
Church been produced, the whole baseless fabric of his hopeles cause 
would soon fall to pieces— the tmth should then come forth — ^it would 
bo out of his power to impose any longer on the credulity of the pub* 
lie. Bat may we be allowed to ask, when a man undertakes a state- 
ment in which the religions character of a whole nation is involved, 
. and that be stands notoriously gnilty of a flagrant and wilful suppres- 



436 

fdon of the truth, what claim can that man have to credibility? It 
matt, moreover, be temariced, that the question now before as, Is not 
strictly ipeaking a polemical one ; it is not whether the catholic doc- 
trine relative to the Sacrifice of the Mass be right or wrong, or whether 
the ancient Irish were right or were wrong in believing it to be a sacrt- 
fice of propitiation; bat the question is, did they believe it to be pro^ 
pitiatory ? Hence it is altogether an historical question. Usher under- 
takes to delineate the character of the ancient Irish, he represents them 
as holding the Eucharistic oblation to be nothing more than a mere 
sacrifice of thanksgiving, he represents them as differing ^toto coeto** 
from their catholic descendants of the present day; their charactery 
therefore, rested in his hands, while honour and justice required thai 
he should have dealt with it foirly and candidly. Had he been inclined 
to act in an upright manner, he would in the first instance have pro* 
duced this Canon, and then let him, if he were able, convince his rea-* 
ders that it did not or could not militate against the position en which 
he set out. He should do the same with their liturgies, in a word, as 
it was an historical subject, he should fairly treat it as such, and not 
by obtruding a few garbled isolated extracts, which by-the-bye pnwe 
nothing for his cause, endeavour to gain a currency for his own absurd 
inventions, and at the same time malign and depreciate the character 
of an ancient, a faithful and a stedfastly orthodox people. 

To the aforesaid Canon may be added another still more andent. — 
It is the 12th among the Canons of the Synod of St Patrick and is en* 
titied:— <<0/ the Oblati&n/or the dead;'' in these words; ''Hear the 
Apostle saying, there i$ a $in unto deaths I do not euy thmt for it any 
one do pray. And the Lord ; Do not give the holy to dogs. For he, who 
will not deserve to receive the Sacrifice during his life, how can it help 
him after his death ?" From this Canon, it follows that the Sacrifice 
was accustomed to be otfered up for the purpose o/ he^ingj and that of 
course it was considered propitiatory. The sin unto death, above r^ 
ferred to, is that of final impenitence. For persons dying In Uus state 
that is for impenitent sinners, the Sacrifice was not otfered, and why ? 
1)ecause it could not help them. ** For, (says the Canon) be who will not 
deserve to receive the Sacrifice during his life, how can it hefy him after 
his death ?^^ Hence it is clear that he, who did deserve to receive it 
during life, could, according to the Fathers of this Synod, receive he^ 
from it after death ; in consequence it becomes propitiatory. Now this 
Canon of St. Patrick has, in the hands of the ArcfaUdiop, shared the 
same fate with the former; he has cushioned them both, while at the 
same time he has treated the character of our Apostle, of the Fathers 



437 

of the Irish Charch and of the najtion at large, in a manner manifestly 
unbecoming that of a man of principle or a scholar. 

We have already alluded to the ancient liturgies of the Irish Church ; 
let us therefore in a brief manner examine one of these and see whether 
or not the ancient Irish had believed the sacrifice of the Mass to be one 
of propitiation. For this purpose the reader shall be referred to the an^ 
cient Irish Missal, the Cursus Scotorum. A description of this very 
ancient Missal shall be given in a subsequent appendix ; we shall now 
have recourse to some of the Orations, or as they are called in the Mis- 
saly QmteiiatiaMSf in order to show that the masses contained therein 
had been propitiatory. In a Mass for the dead, entitled '^ Pro drftmcti$^^ 
i« contained the following Oration: '< Grant O Lord to him, thy servant 
deceased, the pardon of all his sins, in that secret abode, where there 
is no longer room for penance— do yon, O Christ, receive the soul of thy 
servant, wliich thou hast given and forgive him his trespasses more 
abundantly than he has forgiven those who have trespassed against him.'' 
This Missal has also a Mass for the living ajod the dead, << Pro vivU et 
drfmmeiiSf^ in which we read the following Oration: <* Propitiously 
grant, that this sacred oblation may be profitable to the dead in obtain- 
ing pardon, and to the living in obtaining salvation — grant to them (the 
living and the dead) the full remission of all their sins and that indul- 
gence which they have always deserved.'' 

Were it necessary, we could illustrate the subject by a host of addi* 
tional evidence; tlie authorities, however, which have been already ad- 
vancedy must in the mind of every fair, impartial reader, be considered 
conclusive; they exhibit in the plainest terms what had been the faith 
of the ancient Irish on this most important dogma, as well as the folly 
of the man who had undertaken to malign their creed and impose on the 
public by his extravagant misrepresentations. 

Thb Rbal Presence.— In endeavouring to steer his course 
through the last subject the Archbishop soon found himself beset with 
insurmountable difficulties ; but when he had entered on the doctrine 
of the real presence of the body and blood of Christ in the Sacra- 
ment and ventured to show that it had never been numbered 
among the religious tenets of the ancient Irish, he was clearly 
compelled to abandon the enterprize. If clear and expressive 
language be admitted, the universal belief of this Apostolical doc- 
trine in the ancient Church of Ireland is as incontestibly established as 
the very existence amongst them of Christianity itself. Should every 
record have been profoundly silent on the subject, does it not follow, as a 
regular corollary from the testimonies which have been already ad- 
vanced on the sacrifice of the Mass, that the real presence of Christ in 



438 

the fiucharlsi bad bden a doctritu; universally believed from the very in- 
fancy of our national chur($h ? otherwise what means that strong expres- 
sion of St. Columba, ^*to make according to custom tkt body of Christ-*'* 
or these words of Cogitosas, that the bishop entered by one door ^ to 
immolate the sacred Lord's Sacrifice^'*'' while St. Brigid and her nons 
entered by another ^ that thiy might partake of the banquet of the body 
and blood of Jesus Christ.'*'* Bat as we shall have occasion to produce 
some ftirther testimony in the seqael, let as first attend to the Archbishop 
and endeavour to learn on what groands he could so confidently assert 
that the real presence of the body and blood of Christ in the Eucharist 
was a doctrine with which the ancient Church of Ireland bad been to- 
tally unacquainted. Here the reader may, perhaps, expect to find an 
overwhelming selection of authorities, or at least some one authority 
containing a positive denial of the doctrine. But no such thing appears; 
in the several passages which Usher had found scattered throughout the 
works of these ancient writers, the Eucharist is distinctly called the 
body of the Lord, the body and blood of Christ, the Sacrament of the 
most sacred body and blood of the Lord ; expressions perfectly similar 
to those used by all catholics at the present day. Unable to redst soeh 
obvious language he wanders completely from Htxe enbfect and at length 
is compelled to rest the whole merits of his case on an extract selected 
firom the writings of SedullQs the Commentator, whom we have alreadjr 
had occasion to notice. In his Commentary on St. Paulas first Epistle 
to the Corinthians, xi, 84, and on the words << in remembrance of me^^ 
Sedulius observes ^that Christ has left a memory of himself unto us^ 
just as if one, that was going on a distant Journey, should leave some 
token with him whom he loved; that as often as he beheld it he might 
call to his remembrance his benefits and friendship.^^ It would require 
an extraordinary mind to discover any thing in this passage which could ' 
exclude the real presence of Christ in the Sacrament; on the contrary, 
his real presence is that wliich makes it an invaluable token of his love. 
The Commentator too was speaking the language of catholics when he 
said, that Christ has left unto us a memory of himself; for every catholic 
acknowledges that this mysterious Sacrament is commemorative of the 
sufferings of Christ, although Christ himself be verily and substaaUally 
contained therein, yet in a manner not subjected to our senses. The 
real presence of Christ under the sacramental species by no means pre* 
vents it from being a memorial ; it even makes the memorial more im* 
pressive and endearing. There is nothing then in the expressions em« 
ployed by Sedulius which could indicate a denial of the real presence \ 
on the contrary, these very same expressions have been re-echoed by 



439 

many of the most eminent doctors aad catholic writers of every age. — 
St. Thomas of Aquin in a lesson which be had written for the feast of 
CotpuM Chrutiy says, << That in the Sacrament is kept up the memory* of 
that most excellent charity, which Christ manifested in his passion — 
and that in the last supper when having celebrated the Pasch with his 
disciples he was abont to pass from this world to his Father, he insti* 
tuted this Sacrament a# n perpetual memorial of his passion, and thus 
has left a singular consolation to the persons grieved for his absence,^* 
Will Archbishop Usher undertake to say that St. Thomas of Aqnin had 
not believed in the real presence^ and yet where is the difference between 
his language and that which has been already quoted from Sedulins ? 
He has, it appears, taken a particular fancy to the evidence of this dis* 
tingulshed Commentator, he professes a singular veneration for his name 
and sets the highest value on his testimony, but we shall soon see how 
nnOeurly, how dishonourably he has dealt with both the writings and the 
character of this ancient and learned author. Sedulius, in a passage 
immediately antecedent to the one already noUced, while commenting 
on the words of Christ as quoted by St. Paul ; ^ Take and eat; thU'u 
my body y"* has these words — '^Asif Paul said, beware not to eat thai 
body unworthily, whereas it ie the body of Christ,^* Now it must, in 
the first place be remarked that this passage has been altogether omitted 
by Usher — and secondly while it contains an explicit avowal that the 
Eucharist is the body of Christ, it must at the same time serve to illus- 
trate the commentator's meaning of the sentence which immediately 
follows, and which as we have seen above has been of no use whatever 
to the hopeless cause of our uncandid opponent. 

In fact the united testimony of our ancient records, the whole chain 
of drcamstances connected with ihe history of the Irish Church most 
clearly demonstrate the extravagance of the cause which the Doctor 
had so gratuitously attempted to establish. It may be recollected that 
our Apostle St. Patrick had converted Ethnea and Fethlimia, the 
daughters of King Leogaire : the Tripartite life written by St. Evia 
gives us the following remarkable account of this event: '^ But when 
they had been more and more desirous to behold their spouse, the holy 
man (St. Patrick) says to them, * clothed in mortal flesh ye cannot 
see the Son of God; but to behold him in the brightness of his majesty 
it is necessary to lay aside the corruptible covering of flesh and first 
to receive his body and blood lying concealed after an invisible manner 
under the form and species of bread and wineJ" On hearing these 
words, the virgins, inflamed with more ardent love, instantly begged 
to receive the communion of the Sacrament of the body and blood of 



440 

Chrhf^^ Surely no CaUiolic at the present day coold speak or write 
in more clear and expressive language than this. In the fourth life of 
Si. Brigid it is stated, that '< St. Nennidh, on hearing that the blesaed 
Brigid was sick, went to see her^ and at the hour of her departure she 
TGceiveA the body and blood qf our Lord JesutCkristf the Son of ike 
living Gody from the most pure hands of the Saint, as she herself had 
foretold." In like manner we read/ that *<St Fechin having been 
strengthened by the sacrament of the most holy body and blood of the 
Lordy resigned his soul to his Creator." St. Columbanusy after hating 
in his ** Penitential" enjoined the necessity of confession before Mass, 
has these words : ^< For the altar is the tribunal of Christ, and his body 
which i$ there with his blood marks out those who approach in an uu- 
woHhy state." What language can be plainer than this? << His body 
which is there (ou the altar) with his blood," ^., how could it be there 
if there was nothing but the figure, how could it be there if it were 
absent? Had Columbanus indeed foreseen that such a man as Arch- 
bishop Usher would at some distant period start up and make an at- 
tempt, by misrepresenting his words, to malign the ancient religion of 
that country, of which this great Saint had been the glory and orna- 
ment, it is very probable that the above concise but conclusive sentence 
would have been accompanied by something else — by a warning, which 
it is probable might be disregarded, but would not on that account be 
the less awful. The number of similar quotations which could be pro- 
duced would comprize a volume in itself, but we deem it unnecesKary 
to waste any more time on the subject. Before, however, we put a 
close to this paragraph, let us for a moment contemplate the peculiar 
circunstances of the Irish Church at this early period. Her mission- 
aries, nay her apostles, had been scattered over the surfiuse of Europe : 
Columbanus was preaching at Bobbio, Gallus at Constance, Rumold 
in Mecklin, Virgiiios in Saltzburg, Donatus in Tuscany; and these 
men were all in constant connexion with the Head of the Church and 
were held in the highe:it esteem both by the Apostolic See and by ihe 
prelates of all the national Churches throughout the western world. — 
Would this respect, this veneration have been paid to them had they 
denied the real presence of Christ in the sacrament, rejected the Sacri- 
fice of the Mass or renounced the Supremacy of the Apostolic Chair, 
doctrines which at that time had been professed all over the Christian 
Church ? If the doctrine of these apostolic Irishmen had been such 
as Usher endeavours to represent it, it must then follow that the same 

• Fechin'a life, chap. XLVIII. 



441 

had been the creed of the Gallican, of the Roman and of the whole western 
Church and that consequently the Popes Boniface, Gregory the Great, 
Celestine and the other Pontiffs, who had sat in the chair of St. Peter 
daring these ages, had neither believed or practised any of the above- 
ini^tioned Catholic doctrines — an absurdity which no man, unless be- 
reft of all common reason, would seriously venture to put forward. — 
Moreover the character of the Irish Church, in consequence of her 
schools and the great influx of scholars from all parts of Europe, had 
been rapidly and widely circulated; the religious tenets which she pro- 
fessed were well know not only to the prelates of Britain but also to 
thos^ of Gaul, Germany, Italy and other great national Churches, yet 
we find that neither Bede or any other writer of those times has ever 
accused her with having denied the doctrine of the real presence, or 
any other doctrine emt)raced and inculcated by the Catholic Church. — 
We have already proved that the belief of the real presence was that 
which had been preached by our great Apostle when he converted the 
nation ; if then the idea of a figurative presence had been ever known 
amongst them, it must have been introduced at some subsequent 
period. We, therefore, require, as we did in the commencement of 
this appendix, by whom was it introduced, or when or how did this 
innovation take place; let us have a fair historical account of this most 
pablic, most important event; let the annalist be mentioned — let the 
record be produced. Unfortunately for the cause of the Archbishop, 
no such annalist can be discovered — no such record can be found. On 
the contrary aH our ancient writers, all the remnants Of our national 
antiqnity with one universal testimony proclaini aloud that the doctrine 
of the real presence of the body and blood of Christ in tlie sacrament 
was tbat which had been believed by the ancient Church of Ireland in 
every district and in every age since the< introduction of Christianity 
into the country^ We, therefore, with every reason conclude that the 
ancient Irish believed in this great sacrament exactly as the Catholic 
Charch teaches, and as their Catholic descendants do undividedly and 
stedfastly believe at the present day. 

Oif Purgatory. — Notwithstanding the clear, stem testimony of 
our ancient canons, and the numberless instances of prayers for the 
dead, which are to be fomid in almost all the ecclesiastical records of 
the country, Archbishop Usher is determined that this doctrine also 
shall be sa1>mitted to his impartial observations and roundly asserts 
that the practice of praying for departed souls had been i matter al- 
tbgether unknown to the ancient Irish. Let us, then, briefly examine 
the grounds on which he endeavours to establish this most extravagant 

3k 



442 

proposition. In a tract said to have been written by SL Patrick, and 
outitled << Dd Tribas Habitacalis/' we read: « There are three babi- 
tatitions under the power of the Almighty: the 6rst^ the lowest and the 
middle; the highest of which is called the kingdom of God or heaveziy 
the lowest is termed belly and the middle is named the present world or 
the circuit of the earth The extremes of these habitations are alto- 
gether contrary to each other, but the middle hath some resemblance 
to the extremes. For in this world there is a mixture of good and 
bad; whereas in the kingdom of God there are none bad but all good; 
but in hell there are none good but all bad: and both these places are 
supplied out of the middle. Por of the men of this world, some are 
exalted to heaven, others are thrust down into hell. For like are 
joined unto like, that is to say, good to good and bad to bad— just men 
lo angels, transgressors to disobedient angels. The blessed are called 
to the kingdom prepared for them from the beginning of the world, and 
the wicked are driven into eternal fire, which is prepared for the devil 
iind his angels.^' In the first place it must be remarked that there ex- 
ists a great diversity of opinion as to the author of the work ^'De 
Tribus Uabltaculis.'^ Some ascribe it to St. Patrick, others to St. 
Augustin and many to St. Bernard. Secondly, admitting it to be the 
work of St. Patrick, it amounts to no more than a mere negative argu- 
ment; does it follow because the author is silent as to a place of purga- 
\ ion that he did not believe in the existence of any such place ? Thirdly, 
:iu account of this state of temporary punishment had nothing to do 
>vith the object contemplated by the writer in the aforesaid work. Ui» 
object was to give a general description of the three principal states of 
liian, that of trial and those of misery and happiness. Now the souls 
in purgatory are happy — ^wherever there is hope there is happiness. — 
The damned in hell can have no happiness, for they cannot hope — they 
never can expect to enjoy the beatific vision. Not so with souls suffer- 
isig for venial faults, in that prison where the justice of heaven will de- 
iiiand the last farthing, they have hope, they are certain of at length 
i;.!holding their God and of becoming partakers of his glory. Hence 
I hey are to be m>mbered among the happy, and for this reason the 
: iithor was not called upon to enter into any particular description of 
tiicir state. Finally, the above quotation evidently proves nothing; the 
j rincipal passage of it is contained in these words: ''For of the men of 
litis world, some are exalted to heaven, others are thrust down into 
i.cll.'' Here the author says, that of the men of this world, some are 
( xaltrd to heaven, but he does not say that these souls are exalted to 
I. raven immediatety after their death. Mankind is divided by this vTher 



443 

into Iww classes, namely, the just and the unjust. Now had he stated 
that all the just go to heaven immediateiy after their departure from 
this world, this indeed might be an argument of some value to Usher, 
^t he states no such thing; it is, therefore, most evident that no infer- 
ence ean be deduced from the above mentioned quotation which could 
in the least prove to us that the Catholic doctrine of purgatory had been 
a taoet unknown to the ancient Church of Ireland. 

To this he adds a Canon ascribed to an ancient Irish Synod, which 
runs thus: "Tbat the soul being separated from the body is presented 
before the tribunal of Christ, who renderetfa its own unto it according to 
its actions ; and that neither the Archangel can lead it into life until the 
Lord judge it, nor can the devil carry it unto pain unless the Lord do 
damn it.*^* How this Canon can militate against a belief in purgatory 
is a point rather difficult to discover. The Archangel cannot lead the 
soul into life until it is first judged and even then the Canon does not 
state that the soul is presently introd need into heaven. Besides a transi - 
lory state of purgation is life, for the soul therein detained is just hi the 
sight of God and consequently has life and will, according to the divine 
mercy, become a partaker of the kingdom of heaven. Usher in con- 
clusion enters into some unmeaning allusions to St. Patrick^s purgatory 
in Lough Derg; but what has this to do with the belief of the ancient 
Irish as to tbe Catholic doctrine of purgatory? In fact the man him- 
jielf seems to be sensible that in the fruitless attack which h^ had made 
on the religion of this ancient people, he had actually to contend 
against th^ united testimony of all tbe ecclesiastical records of the 
country. The canons and liturgies which we have already placed be- 
fore the reader, when treating on the Sacrifice of the Mas8,t are more 
than sufficient without the aid of any other evidence, to upset at once 
bis absurd chimerical assertion. Wc may, however, by way of con- 
clusion, take notice of the following authorities: in* D^Achery^s collec- 
tion of the canons of the ancient Irish we find tbe foUowing: ^'Tlm 
Church now offers the Sacrifice to Ood in many ways, (for many rea- 
sons,) first, for itself; secondly, fgr the commemoration of Jesus Christ ; 
and thirdly, for the souls of the depafted.'^'^X Here is an expreis Canon 
conveying the belief of tbe whole Irish Church. Let Usher give us 
sometbing like this and we shaU be inclined to listen to him. It is 

• MS. in BiMioL Cotton. t Sec p. 439, cl Scq. 

X Synodus Ait. — Nunc £cclesia mnltiu niotirs ofTcit Domino. Piimo, pro >ci|)5a ; 
5ccundo, pro comTnetnorationc Jesu CluUli, qui ili.xit, " Hoc facile in meam coiii- 
ncmorationem/' tcriio, pro animabiw tk-functoruw."— Lib. 11. caj>. 9. 



444 

4at«d in (he life of St. Fulclierius^* that '^he was accostomed to pray 
(or the repose of the soul of Ronaiiy a chieftain of Ele^ and that be had 
frequently recomqiended the soul of the sane chieftain to the prayers of 
the fatthfal/' In a life of SL Brendan, quoted by Usher himself, we 
read: <« Tkat the prayer (/ the Iwing doth ftrofit much the dead.'' It 
is recorded in the ancient life of St Ita, that ^<she had constantly 
prayed for the soul of her uncle, and that alms had been given ^y his 
sons*' for the same purpose. Did our space permit, or were it indeed 
required, numberless similar autiiorities could be produced; w<, there- 
Core, conclude that the doctrine of praying for the dead, or in otiier 
words, of purgatory, had b^n universally believed and constantly 
practised in the ancient Church of Ireland. 

IMAOBS— PRATBRi TO THB SAINTS.— In noticing the obseiratioBs 
which Archbishop Usher has thought proper to make on these snlgectsy 
we are certainly throwing away both time and paper. He gives us 
an extract from Sedulius to the following effect: ^ That it is inqiious 
to adore any other besides the Vatlier, the Son and the Holy Ghotty 
and that all the soul oweth unto God, if it bestoweth it upon any be- 
sides God, it committeth adultery .'*t To this he sut^oins a passage 
from the Commentator Claudius, ^ That God doth not dwell in things 
made with hands nor in metal or stone.''} What has this to do with 
the respect which the ancient Irish paid to the cross and to the images 
of Christ and his saints? No Catholic adores the cross, nor does be 
believe that any divinity resides in the metal, stone or other material 
of which the image is constructed. Moreover, the Doctor was per- 
fectly incorrect in introducing Claudius; for as we have seen already 
this Commentator was not an Irishman. On the contrary he was in 
all probabiUty the Iconoclast Bishop of Turin against whom our 
learned countryman Dungal had writtten his celebrated work, ^Re- 
sponsa contra perversas Claudii Turonensis episcopi Sententias." The 
vei^y writings of Dungal would indeed have been suffident to convince 
Usher that the practice of paying a relative veneration to the cross, to 
relics and images, and of invoking the intercession of the saints had 
been universally observed in the ancient Church of Ireland. Against 
the heretic Claudius, Dungal has published the work already mentioned 
and in it he shows that, from the most primitive times, the cross of 
Christ and the relics and images of the saints had been universally pre- 
served in churches, for the purpose of recalling to the minds of the 
faithful the sufferings and example of Christ and of his saints, and proves 

• Chap. XVIII. t Cemment. on Galat. chap. VI. x Id. on Math. chap. 11. 



445 

that due respect and veneratiou had beeu always paid to them. Dun- 
gsU tli«n eniera on tha dgctrine of the invocation of sainU, in which be 
obeerves : " If the apostles and martyrs, while in this world, could pray 
fpr others, how much more so can they do It after their crowns, victo- 
ries and triumphs?" We meet with the practice of this deviotion in the 
recorded acts of all our ancient Irish saints. The metrical life of St. 
Brigidy written by St. Brogan in the seventh century, concludes with 
these words: ''There are two holy virgins in heaven, who may become 
my protectors, Mary and Brigid, on whose patronage let each of us 
depend." In like manner St. Livinus, in the epitaph which he had 
composed to perpetuate? the memory of St. Bavo at Ghent, thus implores 
the prayers of the Saint: '' This church which thou bast founded, may- 
est. thou, O.boly Bavo, protect by thy merits." But what necessity 
for dwelling longer on this topic; all our ancient liturgies bear an 
uaanipious testimony to the belief and practice of this apostolical doc- 
trine among our forefathers since the very introduction of Christianity 
into the country. There. have been^ as we shall see, in our account 
of the Cursus Scotornmi* masses appointed for the festivals of the 
Blessed Virgin, for those of the apovtles and of other saints ; while the 
collects of all these masses contained the prayers of both priest and 
people, imploring the intercession of these saints through the infinite 
i^eritsof our Lord Jesu^, Christ. It is, therefore, a most undeniable 
truths that these Catholic .doctrmes had been believed and practised in 
the ancient Church of Ireland, exactly as {hey had been from the in- 
troduction of the Gospel, in all the other national churches of the 
Christian world. 

Chrism. — When a man undertakes to defend a tottering cause,' and 
that at length he finds both himself and his cause on the brink of the 
pKcipice, be is glad to lay hold on any thing. This it was .which had 
urged the Archbishop to have recourse to a letter addressed by Lan- 
franc to Gotbricin the eleventh century, and in. which that Prelate 
comi^ains that, among the Irish, chrism had not been used in the ad* 
ministration of baptism* Now Usher had known perfectly well that 
the application of consecrated chrism had nothing whatever to do with 
tke essence of the sacrmment of baptitm; that it was nothing more 
than a mere ceremony, and that consequently it was neither opposed to 
Catholic Mth or. contrary to the apostolical ^istitutions. ' The Irish 
Church, not considering it essentially necessary, bad not, it is probable, 
enjoined its observance; bat what objection can begrpunded on this? 

* See Appendix III. 



446 

Various other ceremonies had in many churches been employed in 
the administration of the sacrament of baptism, while in lapse of time 
they fell into disase ; in short, ceremonies have nothing whatever to do 
with faith. An important observation may, however, be drawn from 
this letter of Lanfranc. Had the Church of Ireland been such as 
Usher would wish to represent it — had the supremacy of the Pope, the 
real presence, the Sacrifice of the Mass, and purgatory been doctrines 
which the ancient Irish neither practised or believed, why did not Lan- 
franc in his letter accuse them of it? why confine himself to the 
omission of chrism, a mere ceremony, and pass over the essential 
dogmas of the Christian religion? We are well accustomed to hear 
persons impudently asserting, even at the present day, that these 
tenets, or as they term them, Romish practises, had been introduced 
into this country by Henry II and the Normans. Now Lanfranc 
was a Norman, and if, for example, the Church of Ireland had in his 
time, believed that the blessed Eucharist was only a figure of the body 
of Christ, why not make mention of this in his letter? if they had 
differed so essentially from him and from the Galilean Church whence 
he came, why not reprimand them, why has he passed over all these 
great dogmas in profound silence? The reason is evident, because the 
Irish people had believed in them as well as himself; they had bdieved 
in them and practised them in every age since the light of Christianity 
had first beamed on the nation, and the same belief continues to flour- 
ish triumphantly to this day notwithstanding the multiplied grinding 
oppressions to which this faithful persevering people had been for so 
many ages subjected. The letter of Lanfranc, therefore, so far from 
being available to the cause of Usher, contributes most clearly and 
powerfully to upset his extravagant system altogether. 

On the Celibacy of the CLEROY.~The discipline of the ancient 
Irish has, it appears, engaged the attention of the Archbishop no less 
than the venerable faith which the same people had professed. The 
reader must have been already aware that the question relative to the 
Celibacy of the catholic clergy is only a mere matter of discipline, it is 
purely an ecclesiastical law, and consequently has no connection what- 
ever with the principles of the Catholic faith. According to Usher this 
law had no existence in the ancient Church of Ireland, and hence he 
maintains that the clergy had been permitted to marry. In support of 
this, he refers to the sixth Canon of the Synod, called of Patrick, Aux- 
ilius and Iseminus, which runs in these words : — ** If any Clerk from the 
Ostiarius, or door-keeper up (o the Priest, shall be seen without being 
habited in hii tunic, and if his bead be not shorn according to the Roman 



447 

manner^ and if his wife will wallt out without her head veiled, he shall 
be contenmed by the laity and separated from the Church.^^* In the first 
place, it is manifest that this Canon cannot be placed among the number 
of those ascribed to St. Patrick. It enjoins the observance of the Ro- 
man tonsure; now we have seen that this tonsure had not been intro< 
duced into Ireland until about the middle of the seventh century; hence 
the Canon now quoted must have been framed either at that or at some 
subsequent period. Moreover, from this Canon, it cannot with any de- 
gree of certainty be inferred that priests had been permitted to marr>'. 
It says, ^^ If any Clerk from the Ostiarlus up to the Priest (mque ad 
Sacerdotem) shall be seen &c. ;*^ this then may signify the Clerks or 
ecclesiastics of the seve^ orders up to priesthood, but not the Priest; 
it includes all the orders up to priesthood, but not that order^ and in this 
sense the term Priest as it stands in the sentence bears an ejeclusive sig- 
nification. Should this Canon be construed so as to admit the marriage 
of priests, it would certainly be at variance with many of the most an- 
cient constitutions of the Irish Church. In the Penitential of Cummian, 
to which reference has been so frequently made, we find a Canon, 
which condemns the marriage not only of a Monk, but also of a Clerk. 
" If, (says the Canon,) a Clerk or a Monk, after he has devoted himself 
to God, shall return to his secular habit or marry a wife, he shall do 
penance for t«n years, three of which he shall spend on bread and water, 
and shall ever after abstain from the use of matrimony. According to 
the Penitential of Columbanus '< ecclesiastics who were married before 
they had taken orders, and whose wives were still living, were bound to 
abstain from them, under pain of being considered as adulterers.'^ The 
twentieth Canon of this Penitential is contained in these words: — <Mf 
any Clerk or Deacon or Ecclesiastic of any degree, who was a layman 
in the world with sons and daughters, shall aft«r his conversion (to reli- 
gion) know his wife, and beget a child, he must know that he has com- 
mitted adultery; wherefore he must do penance for seven years on 
bread and water.' ^ In like manner the twelfth Canon of the Penitential 
attached to the Cursus Scotorum ordains: — ^"If any Clerk, or superior 
degree, who had a wife^ and qfter his dignity (his ordination) shall 
again know her^ he must be considered as having committed adultery; 
if a Clerk, he must do penance on bread and water for four years, if a 
Deacon for six, if a Priest for seven and if a Bishop for twelve years.'' 

* " Quicumqus clericns, ab ostisrio usque ad sacerdotem, sina tunica Visns fuerit, 
atque turpitudinem Yenms et nuditatem non tegat ; et si non more Romano capilli 
ejus tonti sint, et uxor ejus si non velato capite ambulaverit ; pariter a laicis con* 
temnentur, et ab Zcclesia scparentur.*'— Can. 6. 



448 

From these Cauons it is evident that the eccle«iasiicai law of Celibacy 
had been obserred in the ancient Chnrch of Ireland and conseqaently 
the explanation which has been given to the first ni<entioned Canon must 
be admitted as the most probable and consistent. Tbe Canon already 
quoted in the commencement of this paragraph, had been evidelrily 
drawn up either in the seventh or in the eighth century; if then the 
marriage of priests had been tolerated at tlris period, it may with 
every probability be presumed that the same toleration had been al- 
lowed in the ages which immediately followed. A practice of thia 
description could not have easily fallen into disaae> and hence it muat 
have prevailed in the tenth and eleventh centuries. Now we may be 
certain that no such toleration had^ existed in the Ghureb of Ireland 
daring the eleventh century; if there had, would Lanfiranc, in his letters* 
have passed over a matter of such importance in sHence? Neither 
did it exist in the twelfth century : Giraldus Cambrensis would have 
readily availed himself of such an occurrence in the many and farioos 
invectives which he was accustomed to pour foKh against tbe habit« 
and character of the Irish clergy, v In all our ancient records we do 
not read of one married priest, no such character is to be found, attd 
it is most certain that the law of clerical celibacy bad been enlbrced 
and observed in Ireland exactiy as it had been in the Roman, GalUcao 
and other national churches. 

On the Usb op TttB ScrIptvreIi.— We shall, in conclusion,- 
briefly take notice of an extract or two which Usher has quoted for 
the purpose of showing that the use of the Scriptures had been general 
among the ancient Irish, and as it would appear of enlisting thai 
people among the biblicals of Ms day! SedoUus observes ^^ Search the 
law, in which the will of the Lord is contained,*'* and Bede, bating 
of the successors of St. Columba says^ ^^ They observed diligently all 
those works of piety and chastity, which they«oald learn in the pro- 
phetical, evangelical and apostolical writings; and all who went in 
company with Aldan, whether they were shorn or laymen, were obliged 
to exercise themselves either in the reading of the Scriptures, or in the 
learning of psalms.^'f It requires some study to discover tbe inference 
which can be deduced from all this. Surely the Catholic Church doei 
not prohibit the use of the Scriptures, provided these sublime and 
dilBcalt writings be read with the proper dispositions. It appeats that 
all who went in company with St Aidan (of Lindisfam) were in the 
habit of exercising themselves in the reading of the ScHptorev. Tmiy 
so they might, for in ih^ perusal of these mysterious, obscure books^ 

• Com. Ephes. v. 17, ^ Eccl. Hist. L. 3, chap. IV. 



449 

they could not possibly have a better expositor, a safer guide, than Ihe 
ve^ man in whose company they were reading. Sedalius says ^ search 
the law,^^ but he does not say gi?e your own meaning to the law, or 
interpret the law according to your own private judgement and set at 
nought the authority of the Church. What a pity it was that Sedulius 
and the Fathers of the Irish Church had not some taste for fanaticism, 
what a misfortune it was both to religion and to society that they had 
not filled the country with bibles and allowed every child and every il- 
literate man to take the sacred volume aqd twist and turn it so as to 
make it answer his own particular whim and fancy. Notwithstanding 
all their missionary labours and all the copies of the sacred text which 
they had transcribed, they could never boast of more than one Church, 
but Archbishop Usher and his biblical followers can glory in some 
thousands, all elegantly disagreeing from each other, and each sturdily 
maintaining the orthodoxy of his principles by passages taken from 
the most difljcult portion of sacred writ The ancient Fathers of the 
Irish Church allowed no man to preach the Gospel until he had been 
first qualified by education and by the reception of holy orders, but 
now, every man being conipetent to become his own expositor of the 
Bible, we have preachers of every rank^ age and sex ; we have even 
madmen with their followers in the streets of Canterbury, while the 
dupes 0( Southcot know to their cost whether or not that successful im- 
l)ostor had profited by the readiQg and private interpretation of the 
scriptures. 

But is it not a melancholy circumstance to witness the talents and 
the research of such a man as Archbishi^p Usher thus literally thrown 
away on a controversy so groundless and extravagant, and in which it 
is evl()^nthe could never succeed ? He knew right well that the posi- 
tion which he had taken was untenable, he was well aware that the 
character which he had laboured to fasten on the ancient Church of 
this country was in open contradiction to all the records and antiquities 
he hafl ever read, it is tben surprising tbat he had made such a bad 
use of those rare endowments with which nature had furnished him 
for far different purposes. There is one way, and only one, for ex- 
plaining this apparently unaccountable circunasiance. He was a bigot, 
and an implacable persecutor of his Catholic countrymen — to this 
abominable spirit of religious bigotry he became a victim — under its 
influence he composed the book which we have briefly reviewed in the 
foregoing pages, and by it has he left to posterity an awful exempljfl<|^- « 
lion of that bane of society and scourge of mankind, religious Intoler?^ 
ance. 

3 }. 



APPENDIX II. 

Penitential Canon$ of the ancient Church of Ireland, 

Among the ancient Irish, the Penitential Canons, so characteristic of 
primitive times, had been most rigorously enforced even down to the 
eighth century and would in all probability have been continued were It 
not for the confusion which the Danish wars had created throughout Uie 
nation. In order to give the reader an idea of the nat^ire of these Peni- 
tential Canons, as observed in the Church of Ireland, we shall have re- 
course to some of our ancient Penitentials and particularly to that of 
Cummlan.* A brief selection may suffice, as an exact enumeration of 
all these Canons would carry us beyond our intended limits. In tiie 
sixth chapter, on the crime of murder the Canon ordains — ^^ Should a 
layman maliciously murder another, he must withdraw from the church 
for forty days, and do penance for seven years on bread and water; bat 
he is not to be allowed to the holy communion, until placed on his death- 
bed. Should he Icill another by accident, he must perform a similar 
penance for five years.t If a person should intend to commit murder, 
but had not the power of perpetrating it, he was to do penance for three 
years.t Should any person in a quarrel, maim or injure another so as 
to render him deformed, he was bound to defray the expenses attending 
the illness of the injured man and \jo do penance for six months on bread 
and water — but should he be unable to meet these expenses, he must 
perform the penance for a year.§ The sin of drunlienness was punished 
by fasting on bread and water for a week ; if attended with vomiting, 
the fast was to be continued for fifteen days.il The crime of adultery 
was punished by a penance of three years, during one year of which 

* Another celebrated Penitential, observed in those times, was that of Cotunbanu, or m 
it is called De PtenitrntUxntm Menmtra taxanda, and which, it must be observed, is alto- 
gether a disdnct treatise from his Regula CambialU Hve de QuotidbmiM PcmitmHit Mma- 
chomm ; the latter having been intended for his institute, whereas the former was an univer- 
sal ecclesiastical canon. — Vide Collect. Sacra, ap. Fleming. 

t Si LaicQS alinm occiderit odii meditalione, sepCem annis peeniteat (in pane et aqua) et 
qiiadraginta dies abstineat sc ab Ecclesia ; circa exitnm aniem vita commonlone dignos ha- 
beatar— qai non voluntarie, scd casn homicidlnm perpetravit, qnlnqnc annis psenileat. — Bx. 
cap. vi. 

; Si Volnerit et son potucrit, tribns annis pseniteat. 

$ Qui per rixam, debilem vel deformem hominem fecerit, reddat impensa* medicis, aegri- 
fwUnem restitnat et medium annum psenlteat In pane et aqua ; si non habnerit nnde reddat, 
uso pstniffcat. 

II Si laicus ftdelis incbriatnr, pspnitcat unam licbdomedara, in pane et aqua : si per ebrie- 
tairm vomiinm ftcit, qnindecim dies pseuitcat.— -ex rap. ii. 



4ol 

Qotbing was allowed but bread and water.* The siu of concupiscence 
indulged in thought, was punished by a penance of one year. Im- 
modest conversation was subjected to a penance of forty days. For 
fornication a penance of two years was to be enjoined.f For the crime 
of perjury, a penance of three years was to be enjoined; if the peijury 
had been committed in a charch, this penance was to be continued for 
eleven years. Should a layman, through a motive of avarice be guilty 
of peijory, he was boond to sell all he had and give it to the poor, after • 
which retiring into a monastery, he should there serve the Lord during 
the remainder of his life. A simple lie unattended with injury, was 
punbbed by Jt repetition of thirty psalms or the constant silence of three 
days.! Shoald a man be guilty of theft, he was to make immediate 
restUution nind fast for 120 days on bread and water — ^had he committed 
the crime frequently and was anable to make restitution, he should do 
penance on bread and water for two years, and another year for 120 
days, after which he was to be reconciled to the Church at Easter.§ He 
who indulges an hatred for his brother, so long as he neglects to over- 
eome that feeling, mast do penance on bread and water. The person 
who through envy is guilty of detraction or who willingly listens to the 
detractor, must alike do penance for tliree days on bread and water.lj 
Should a man be guilty of usury on any account, he must do penance 
for four years, one of these years on bread and water. In fine, whoever 
refused to receive guests under his roof, or neglected to exercise hospi- 
talky, so long as he thus persevered or did not give alms, he must for an 
equal period do penance on bread and water — ^but should he remain ob- 
stinate in his avarice, he is to be separated from the faithfuLU 

* Si qab Mtttlterian fecerit, id est cam nxorc aliens, ant ipooMm, vel virginem corrnpe- 
rit, ant sanctimonialem, tribuB annin psniteat, primo ex hi» in pane et aqna. 

i 81 qnis foraicarerit de lafeis, duobns annia paeniteat. Qui concnpiacit incnte fornicari, 
8cd mm potnlt, anno peeniteat, maxime io Quadragesima.— Qni tnrptloqaio vel aspecta coin- 
quinatos est, qoadraginta dies paeniteat. 

I Si quia perjurinm fecerit, Laid tribns annis pseniteant, derici quinque, sobdiaconi sex* 
diaeoni septem, presbyteri decern, epiacopi dnodecim. Qai perjurinm fadt io ecclesia, an- 
dedm annis paeniteat. Si qnis laicus per capiditatem perjorat, totas res suas vendat et do- 
net (Beo) in panperibnv, et conversus in monasterio nsqae ad mortem serviat Deo. Mendax 
et non nocalti damnetnr, tribns diebos tacendi, vel triginta paalmos cantet.— ex cap. v. 

$ Si laicns lemel ftartnm fecerit, reddat quod ftiravit, et in tribns qnadragesimis cum pane 
et aqoa paeniteat. Si saepins fecerit et non liabet nndc reddat, annis duobus in pane et aqua 
pmiteat ; et alio anno tribns qnadragesimis, et sic postea in Pascha reconcilietnr. 

I Qui odit flratrem suum, qnamdiu non repellit odium, tamdin cum pane et aqua sit. Qui 
causa invidiae detraliit, vd libeotur audit detraiientem, tribus diebus in pane et aqaa separe- 
tur. — ex cap. ix. 

^ Si qnis uanraa undecunqne cxegerit, quatuor annis ptcnitcat, uno ex hb in pane et 
aqua. Qulcumqne hoepiies non recepit in domo sua, sicut Dominus praeceptt| quanto tem- 
pore lioBpites non recepit, neque elcemosynam fecit, tanto tempore paeniteat in pane et aqna — 
permaoen^ autem in avaritia alienetir. — ex rnp. viil. 



k 



APPENDIX in. 

Cvrsus Seotorumy or Miual^f themneieHt Irish. 

The Litargy usaaUy called Cmrnu Seotorwm was thai which bad 
been flnt brought to Ireland by St Patrick and was the only one 
that had been osed until about the close of the sixth centoiy^ that is, 
during the times of the first class of Irish saints. About this period the 
Galilean Liturgy (Cursiis Gallorum) was, it is probable, introduced 
into this country. The CtarsM Scotorum is supposed to hare been the 
Liturgy originally drawn op and used by St. Mark the Evangelist; it 
was afterwards followed by Sts. Gregory Naziansen, Basil and other 
Greek Fathers, then by Cassian, Uonoratus of Lerins, St. Caesarius 
of Arle% St. Lupus of Troiesand St. German of Anxerre; from whom 
St. Patrick received it when setting out on his mission io Ireland. A 
copy of the Curius Scotorum has been found by MahlUon, in the ancient 
Monastery of Bobbioy of which establishment Columbanus was the 
founder, and which missal that learned writer believes to have been 
written at least one thousand years before his time. The Canon in 
this Liturgy is almost the same as that of the Roman Missal; but in 
the Communieantes^ after Cosmse et Damiani, it has iiilarii, Martini, 
Ambrosii, Augustini, Gregorii, Hieronjrmi, Benedict!. It contains two 
masses for the dead; one a general mass, and the other Mitsa Saeer- 
dotir D^wictL Among the feasts are the Assumption of the Blessed 
Virgin, the Cathedra S. Petri, the Invention of the Holy Cross, the 
Nativity of St. John the Baptist, the feasts of Sts. Peter and Paul, of 
Sts. James and John, of St. Michael the Archangel, of St. Stephen, 
St. Sigismund and St. Martin of Tours. It has a Penitential annexed 
to it, and a Credo, the same in substance as that called the Apostles 
Creed, but not as forming a part of the mass. 

The Cursus Oallorvm had been introduced into Ireland during the 
times of the second class of Irish saints. This Liturgy is ascribed to 
St. John the Evangelist and vras followed by St. Polycarp, St. Ignatius, 
St Irenftus and others. In process of time it contained a great num- 
ber of masses for Irish saints and particularly the edition which had 
been used by the monks of the Columbian Order. This Cursus con- 
tinued until the twelfth century, when the Roman Liturgy and offices 
were introduced into Ireland by the Legate GfUeberf, Bishop of Lim- 
erick and were universally received about the time of St. Malachv. 



THE BORROWER WILL BE CHARGED 
AN OVERDUE FEE IF THIS BOOK IS NOT 
RETURNED TO THE LIBRARY ON OR 
BEFORE THE LAST DATE STAMPED 
BELOW NGN RECEIPT OF OVERDLfE 
NOTICES DOES NOT EXEMPT THE 
BORROWER FROM OVERDUE FEES