Skip to main content

Full text of "Annals of the Entomological Society of America"

See other formats


0 Rd ST A So tel A em a 
< RDB ah he hn dome 


has 
ni (aaa 
mm 
b 


One 


“ty ( 
Oe mp 


nT 
H 


| 


| ‘fin & 
jl if %, 


} | 


| 


d 


root 


by Mea List 


VA ‘5 


Cis Howey 
ph bl a 
Re, Reet i P 
vans aa yy \ 
bm 
Pg ily > Be Ne ae 


; Rani) 


? Pay 
“ a My ) ny ie 
Ler i i" ve “a ha) Me 


id hee ik my 


ANNALS 


OF 


The Entomological Society of America 


VOEOME. XV, 1922 


EDITORIAL BOARD 
HERBERT OSBORN, Managing Editor, 
COLUMBUS, OHIO. 


CLARENCE H. KENNEDY, Ass’t Managing Editor, 
COLUMBUS, OHIO. 


A. D. HOPKINS, WM. S. MARSHALL, 
WASHINGTON, D. C. MADISON, WIs. 
J\svi bes IOWA DA bite VERNON L. KELLOGG, 
CORVALLIS, OREGON. WASHINGTON, D. C. 
S. A. FORBES, WM. M. WHEELER, 
URBANA, ILLINOIS. BOSTON, MAss. 
FRANK E. LUTZ, E. M. WALKER, 
NEw YorRK City, N. Y. TORONTO, CANADA. 


FREDERICK C. MUIR, 
HONOLULU, Hawaltt. 


276169 


PUBLISHED QUARTERLY BY THE SOCIETY 
COLUMBUS, OHIO 


== . : " 4 tt OAR: ba f al a) ah ty ; % ~~ . 


= : iv eben prema ™ oll ate Fae ees 


| - 4: zor : : Pee A oe Tie ee. ; 

,) ; +4 

. : ; ar . 

7 : . Pel ae ; : ae sy are ’ ae "i te 4 tee ies ¥ } 
= aT) ‘' Sap ry 


4 “ E 1 ee as 
owe iS 2 rae : eM ae te ‘a ‘ 


‘. y 2 ; =, 
< oR gee ee ay Natt ee foe 


a g o aren 2.5 ate as “aur ' i Fy tes Adil is es aay 


‘ a ; 
oa MEER a qi or * | A nse a 
of 


A Te AAO Ds iter ah wth i > 


CL? ke eens | a a Pr) a eae M 


P : 7 oa 7 b nw ‘ce wear Boogie 7 . f 
fe ts Pe na) ee NT ; ‘ : a) 5 


CONTENTS OF VOLUME XV. 


Wa ker, E. M—tThe Terminal Structures of Orthopteroid Insects: 
Ambmgloveneuc  oLudy. (ParGall)) ee... oe ok bb es Bhs es 


BARNES, Wm., and Linpsay, A. WA Review of Some Generic 
Namesiim the Order Lepidoptera... 2.255) ..2.00. . cee concn 


Proceedings of The Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the Entomological 
SO CISA Ci 2001S (C7 I RS he Ole ee 


Brzz1, M.—On the South American Species of the Dipterous Genus 
@ liinoniy Zam eC ne eres Pas NG os SS are a oo wd Be 
AINSLIE, G. G.—Contributions to a Knowledge of the Crambinz 
tiee(Crambus laqueatellus Clemens)... 5.5 2. Sees: 
Batt, E. D., and Hartzett, ALBERT—A Review of the Desert 
Leafhoppers of the Orgerini (Rhynchota Fulgoride)......... 
Friint, W. P.—Studies of the Life History of Nomophila Noctuella 
Matueson, RoBert, and SHANNON, R. C.—New Mosquito Rec- 


ords and Notes on the Habits of Certain Species from Central 
IMSS SOE le A eas ae a a Re Pc ee Meret eee Ir 


Frost, S. W.—Ecdysis in Tmetocera ocellana Schiff............. 
SmitH, RoGER C.—Hatching in Three Species of Neuroptera.... 


LARRIMER, WALTER H.—An Extreme Case of Delayed Fall 
Bien temecsOrwrlessiat Elyar ye els tS ele eo ht elon: 


Fotsom, Justus W.—Pollination of the Red Clover by Tetralonia 
and Melissodes 


GrauaM, 5. A.—A Study of the Wing Venation of the Coleoptera. . 
KersHaw, J. C., and Muir, F—The Genitalia of the Aucheno- 


Te bhy IE GUS y MOM OGEhatens cle a8 se. sls sce oe es ws oe é 


Ewinc, H. E.—The Phylogeny of the Gall Mites and a New Clas- 


sification of the Suborder Prostigmata of the Order Acarina.. ‘ 


ALEXANDER, C. P.—Undescribed Species of Crane-flies from New 


TOS EEGONG | bake ieee Sea a a ot Ot ik : 


Curran, C. Howarp—The Syrphid Genera Hammerschmidtia 
EMGearachyOpa lili CANAGA.. 602 «2s 456 ec alee cb pie ee 
Brancu, Haze Evisaseta—A Contribution to the Knowledge 
of the Internal Anatomy of Trichoptera.....5........:.... 


BROLEMANN, HENRY W.—Notes on Female Paraiulids 


Oranes, Faustino Q.—Head and Mouth-parts of Mecoptera.... : 


Forses, Wa. T. M.—The Wing Venation of the Coleoptera..... 


OLSEN, Curis E.—Studies of the Species in the Genus Cicadella 
Latreille (Homoptera) of North America, North of Mexico 
Hutt, Frank M.—New Syrphide (Diptera) From Mississippi 


239 


Dates of Issue, Volume XV. 


March Number, mailed April 19, 1922. 
June Number, mailed August 1, 1922. 
September Number, mailed October 10, 1922. 
December Number, mailed February 20, 1923. 


Volume XV. Number 1. 


ANNALS 


OF 


The Entomological Society of America 


MARCH) 4922. 2 


EDITORIAL BOARD. , 


HERBERT OSBORN, Managing Editor, 3 
COLUMBUS, OHIO. 


CLARENCE H. KENNEDY, Ass’t Managing Editor, 
COLUMBUS, OHIO. 

WM. S. MARSHALL, 

MADISON, WIS. 


A. L. LOVETT, VERNON JL. KELLOGG, 
CORVALLIS, OREGON. WASHINGTON, D. C. 


A. D. HOPKINS, 
WASHINGTON, D. C. 


S. A. FORBES, WM. M. WHEELER, 
URBANA, ILLINOIS. Boston, Mass. 


FRANK EK. LUTZ, 
NEw YorE City, N. Y. 


FREDERICK C. MUIR, 
HONOLULU, Hawatt. 


E. M. WALKER, 
TORONTO, CANADA. 


PUBLISHED QUARTERLY BY THE SOCIETY 
COLUMBUS, OHIO 


Entered as second class matter April 11, 1908, at the Post Office at Columbus, Ohio, 
under the Act of Congress of March 3, 1879. 


The Entomological Society of America 
Founded 1906. 


OFFICERS 1922. 


President . 
ARTHUR GIBSON. i ’ i : F ; Ottawa, Canada 


First Vice-President 
W. A. RILEY . : i ; J : y St. Paul, Minnesota 


Second Vice-President 
Riv Al SCoorey: 345 } , ; ‘ i é Bozeman, Montana 


Managing Editor Annals 
HERBERT OSBORN. ; ; : | t 4 Columbus, Ohio 


Secretary-Treasurer 
CO METCRL A CO. 4 ; , ‘ Z : . Urbana, Illinois 


Executive Committee 


THE OFFICERS 


AND 
J. M. AtpricH, E. M. WALKER, 


Ws. T. Davis, O. A. JOHANNSEN. 


Commuitiee on Nomenclature 


EP!) Revi T. D. A. CocKERELL, NATHAN BANKs. 


Thomas Say Foundation 


NATHAN Banks, A. D. MaAcGitiivray, P. P. CALVERT, 
E. B. WILLIAMSON, Wu. T. Davis, 
J. M. Atpricu, Editor. BE. D. Batt, Treasurer. 


Committee on National Museum 
HERBERT Osporn, Chairman. 
C. W. JoHNson, Wm. BARNES, Wm. M. WHEELER, 
James G. NEEDHAM. 


ANNALS 


OF 


The Entomological Society of America 


Volume XV MARCH, 1922 Number | 


THE TERMINAL STRUCTURES OF ORTHOPTEROID 
INSECTS: A PHYLOGENETIC STUDY 


E. M. WALKER, 
Toronto. 


PART «le 


THE TERMINAL ABDOMINAL STRUCTURES OF THE MALE. 


The external genitalia of male insects are so variable in 
structure even within the limits of a single family, that it is a 
very difficult matter to trace the homologies of their component 
parts; and much detailed study of many types from all orders 
must be done before the subject can be placed upon a satis- 
factory foundation. The difficulties experienced in the present 
work in comparing the various types of Orthoptera alone have 
been such that it was found desirable to give a relatively large 
amount of time and space to this order, and as a result the 
other orders have necessarily been somewhat sacrificed. Some 
of them, such as the Plecoptera and Dermaptera, have been but 
superficially treated, owing to lack of material. It is hoped 
that these neglected groups will receive their due share of 
attention at another time. 

In addition to the gentlemen to whom acknowledgments 
were made in the Introduction to this paper, I have to thank 
Mr. Morgan Hebard and Dr. R. J. Tillyard for the loan or 
gift of specimens, and Prof. C. R. Crosby for the loan of books 
from the Library of Cornell University. 

My chief regret in connection with the present investigation 
is that much of the literature on the subject has been inaccessible 


> Annals Entomological Society of America  [Vol. XV, 


to me or was received too late to be of use in the preparation 
ot Part a:* 


Since this part was published I received copies of two short 
papers by L. Chopard, entitled ‘‘Notes préliminaires sur la 
conformation de l’extremité abdominale des Orthoptéres”’ and 
‘Note préliminaire sur la conformation de l’organe copulateur 
des Orthoptéres,’’ published in 1917 and 1918, respectively. 
Still later, when the present work was nearly finished, I received 
a copy of the same author’s fuller treatise entitled ‘‘ Recherches 
sur la conformation et le développement des derniers segments 
abdominaux chez les Orthoptéres,’’ published in 1920. In this 
extensive and valuable work a very large number of forms are 
discussed and much of my own work has been anticipated. 
The general conclusions as to the typical structure of. the 
terminal segments in Orthopteroid insects and the male 
homologies of the parts of the ovipositor are quite in accord 
with my own, but naturally there are some matters on which 
our views are not quite in agreement. .Some reference has been 
made to these in the following pages, but unfortunately Mons. 


Chopard’s work was received too late to give it the consideration © 


that it deserves. 


GENERAL MORPHOLOGY. 


As in the female Pterygote insect, there is also in the male 
usually a single genital aperture, which, however, has a different 
position, namely in the membrane between the ninth and tenth 
abdominal sterna,t though sometimes apparently on the ninth 
sternum itself. This aperture is typically formed by an 
invagination of the body wall, into which open the two primitive 
ejaculatory ducts, the invagination forming a common terminal 
passage, which itself is usually termed the ejaculatory duct. 
In the Ephemerida and Dermaptera, however, this invagination 
does not take place, and although in the latter order the genital 
aperture is frequently single, it is due either to the abortion 
of one of the openings or to the fusion of the terminal parts of the 
two ducts. The aperture is usually borne upon an outgrowth, 
the penis or aedeagus, whose walls may be more or less 

* Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer., XII, No. 4, Dec., 1919, pp 267-316. with Pls. XX- 
XXVIII. 


+I. e., the sterna of the 9th and 10th abdominal segments, whether the 
sternum of segment 1 is present or not. 


ee ee ee 


EOE Ee 


1922] Walker: Structure of Orthopteroid Insects . 3 


chitinized or wholly membranous. Where. two apertures are 
present there are likewise two penes (Ephemerida) or a more 
or less deeply bipartite penis (Dermaptera), but it is probable 
that in these orders the penis or penes are not strictly homol- 
ogous with those of other orders; in fact it appears as though 
the penis may have developed independently in several orders. 
A slightly bipartite penis has been described as occurring also 
in certain Plecoptera (Crampton, 718). The bifid termination 
of the penis in some Acridide simulates this condition slightly, 
but is in no way comparable to it. Among the Apterygota we 
find double penes in- Eosentomon of the Protura (Prell, ’13) 
and a slightly bifid penis in certain genera of Lepismoidea, such 
as Nicoletia (Escherich, ’04), but the former is perhaps not 
strictly homologous with the other case cited, as it is found 
upon the eleventh instead of the ninth segment. The occurrence 
of double penes is probably a very primitive condition, as 
paired genital apertures are frequent in the more primitive 
Arthropods, such as the Crustacea and Diplopoda. 

The penis is frequently eversible and in the everted con- 
dition the chitinized terminal part of the ejaculatory duct 
may project in the form of a spine, the virga. This structure 
is most typically seen in the Dermaptera, and in such forms as 
have a bifid penis the virga is likewise duplicated. It also 
occurs in certain Blattids, and according to Crampton, in some 
Plecoptera. The membranous eversible wall of the penis is the 
glans or praeputial sac. 

There is also, primitively, a pair of chitinous processes, the 
parameres, arising near the base of the penis or from its walls, 
and having typically a lateral or dorsolateral position. They 
are well illustrated by the Dermaptera and certain Ephemerida, 
and it is probable that. the titillators of most Orthoptera 
(although not all the structures so-called) are their homologues. 
It is uncertain, though in the writer’s opinion probable, that the 
parameres of the Thysanura are morphologically identical 
with those of the pterygote insects. Crampton ('20) has 
apparently confused the penes of the Ephemerida with the 
parameres of other insects under the term ‘‘penis valves.”’ 
Chopard (’18) expresses the view that in the Orthoptera 
(including the Blattoidea, Mantoidea and Phasmoidea) there 
are two pairs of processes, which he terms the ‘‘ valves dorsales”’ 
and the ‘‘valves ventrales,’’ between which the genital aperture 


4 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


opens, the latter being sometimes borne upon a penis, sometimes 
not. The structure which he thus designates as dorsal and 
ventral valves are not always, in my opinion, homologous 
in these various groups, nor even, in many cases, within the 
Orthoptera, s. s. The basis for this opinion will be evident 
after the discussion of the various orders. 

The parameres are frequently sunk into invaginations of the 
body wall, or a common invagination (most Orthoptera), from 
which they can usually be protruded. The infoldings thus 
formed may be considerably prolonged into the haemocoele as 
chitinized apophyses for the insertion of muscles, and some- 
times only the invaginations and apophyses are present, the 
freely projecting part of the parameres having disappeared, 
or secondary processes may develop from the walls of the 
invagination. In the Blattoidea, Mantoidea, Grylloblattoidea 
and Phasmoidea the genital aperture, which may or may not 
be borne upon a penis, lies between two asymmetrical lateral 
lobes, which apparently represent the parameres, and I have 
therefore termed them paramere lobes. They usually bear at 
least one chitinous process, and where several occur, one appears 
to be the main process, the others accessory parts. I have, asa 
general rule, considered the main process to represent the 
terminal part of the true parameres, but this is to be regarded 
as merely a tentative hypothesis. Possibly a comparative 
study of the musculature will throw some light on the homologies 
of these puzzling structures. In the Blattids there is often but 
one well-developed process on each side, one of these, right or 
left, being modified into a strong copulatory hook, which can 
be completely retracted into a membranous sheath. 

Between the base of the penis and the paraprocts (laminz 
subanales) there is present in some groups (many Phasmoidea 
and Orthoptera, some Ephemerida) another sclerite, having 
the form of a more or less projecting plate. It is by no means 
evident, however, that the plates situated here in these different 
groups are homologous structures, and it therefore seems hardly 
justifiable to designate them by a common term. In the 
Phasmoidea we have the ‘‘vomer sous-anal’’ of Pantel, which 
this author regarded as belonging to the 10th sternum, but 
which, in my opinion, probably arises from the membrane 
between the ninth and tenth sterna. It projects caudad and 
appears to form a fourth anal valve. In Callibaetis ferrugineus 


1922] Walker: Structure of Orthopteroid Insects 5 


of the Ephemerida there is a somewhat similar plate, but it 
appears to be exceptional in this order; while in the Orthoptera 
a somewhat analogous structure, clearly belonging to the same 
intersternal membrane, is found in a majority of the species. 
It functions, however, not as an anal valve, but as a part of the 
genitalia. This is the part I have called the pseudosternite. 
It has been confused by various writers with the “epiphallus”’ 
or ‘‘titillators’’ (parameres). Crampton (’18), e. g., identifies 
this structure in the Acridide and Gryllide with the “‘epi- 
phallus”’ or parameres of the Tettigoniida, and Chopard (18) 
makes the same error with regard to the Acridide, but in the 
Gryllide he considers it a distinct structure, which he terms the 
““pseudépiphalle.’’ In the latter family it has also been termed 
the “‘anchre”’ by de Saussure and Zehntner (’94) in the genus 
Gryllotalpa, on account of its anchor-like form in that genus. 

Various other structures concerned in copulation are fre- 
quently present. Claspers may be developed from the cerci 
(Dermaptera, Odonata, many Orthoptera); the coxites, or 
coxites and styli (Grylloblattoidea, Ephemerida); the para- 
procts (Odonata Zygoptera, some Orthoptera of the family 
Tridactylidz) ; titillators, copulatory hooks and similar append- 
ages appear upon a great variety of structures, e. g., the 9th 
sternum (Embiidina, some Blattoidea); the 10th tergum 
(Embiidina, Grylloblattoidea, some Plecoptera); the supra-anal 
plate (some Plecoptera); the paraprocts (some Plecoptera and 
Blattoidea, a few Orthoptera of the family Tridactylide); the 
left cercal basipodite (some Embiidina); and finally from the 
vicinity of the genital aperture, including the pseudosternite, 
the parameres and the penis itself (Dermaptera, Ephemerida, 
Blattoidea, Mantoidea, Orthoptera, etc.) 

Other chitinous structures are present in particular groups, 
the most noteworthy of these being connected with the develop- 
ment of the spermatophore sac in the Orthoptera. These 
will be considered in the account of this order. 

The terga and sterna of the terminal abdominal segments in 
Orthopteroid insects are also subject to considerable variation 
apart from that of the more essential genitalic structures, 
some of these modifications being similar to those found in the 
females of the same species. Thus we find that in the Orthop- 
tera the supra-anal plate is nearly always well developed in 
both sexes, while in the Blattoidea, Mantoidea and Isoptera 


6 Annals Entomological Society of America  [Vol. XV, 


it is vestigial or absent and its place is taken by the 10th tergum. 
The cerci, when not modified as claspers in the male, are usually 
similar in the two sexes. 

The Sth sternum* is unmodified in the male, as it does not 
underlie the genital aperture, but the 9th sternum is generally 
much enlarged and is usually termed the subgenital plate, as 
it occupies a position in relation to the genitala analogous to 
that of the 8th sternum in the female. As this implies a 
homology that does not exist, the term “‘hypandrium’’} has 
been recently proposed by Crampton for the male subgenital 
plate. He does not, however, use it in a strictly morphological 
sense, but to designate the terminal ventral sclerite, whether 
this represents the entire sternum or only a part. When the 
9th sternum, e. g., is transversely divided, as in the Ephemerida 
and the Acridide, it is the distal part only that is called the 
hypandrium, but when it is undivided, as in most Orthoptera, 
Blattoidea, Mantoidea, etc., the entire sternum becomes the 
hypandrium. As thus used the term is therefore open to 
objection, as it tends to obscure the homologies of the parts 
concerned, although it is a convenient one to retain for descrip- 
tive purposes. 

The 9th sternum is primitively divided into three plates, a 
basal sternite and two disto-lateral coxites, each of the latter 
bearing a terminal stylus. This primitive condition is well 
exemplified by Grylloblatta, especially in the immature stages 
(Pl. VII, Fig. 66) and certain Ephemerida, such as Blasturus 
nebulosus (Pl. 1, Fig. 2), althoughin the latter the styl (or coxites?) 
are secondarily segmented. In most Ephemerida, however, the 
coxites are fused but remain separate from the sternite, so that 
the former have the appearance of another sternum (coxale) 
and have, in fact, been mistaken for the 10th sternum (Eaton, 
88; Morgan, 713). A similar structure is met with in the 
Phasmoidea and Acridoidea, except that in these groups the 
styli are wanting. In most groups, however, the sternum is a 
single large plate, with or without styli, which when present 
are borne at the distal margin of the plate. Such a sternum 
thus consists of the united coxites and sternite and has therefore 


*T. e., the sternum of the 8th abdominal segment; in reality it is generally 
the 7th actual abdominal sternum. 

+ Incorrectly described as the ‘‘ventral portion of the tenth abdominal 
segment.’’ (Crampton, ’18, p. 50). 


1922] Walker: Structure of Orthopteroid Insects 


~I 


been termed a coxosternum (Verhoeff, 03). Coxosterna bearing 
styli occur in the Blattoidea, Mantoidea, Isoptera and the 
Orthopterous family Tettigoniidz, while coxosterna without styli 
are present in the Dermaptera, Plecoptera, Embiidina and many 
other Orthoptera, besides various orders not considered here. 

The 10th sternum is generally indistinguishable in the adult 
state, but in many Plecoptera, Phasmoidea and Odonata it is 
chitinized, though often not distinctly marked off from the 
tergum, so that the segment is ring-like. In some cases at least 
(Phasmoidea, Odonata) this appears to be a secondary chitiniza- 
tion, correlated with the secondary elongation of the segment. 
Chopard (’17) maintains that the inferior or infero-external 
surfaces of the paraprocts also belong to the 10th sternum, 
while the superior or supero-external surfaces represent the 
11th sternum, this view being based (1) upon the fact that the 
tergum of seg. 10 articulates with the lateral margins of the 
paraprocts, and (2) that these two surfaces of the paraprocts are 
often separated from one another by a distinct angle and may 
differ in coloration or degree of chitinisation. It is true that 
the 10th sternum becomes ‘‘absorbed”’ in the ventral faces 
of the paraprocts, as has been determined in various species 
of Orthoptera by one of my students, Miss Norma Ford, who is 
engaged in a study of the abdominal musculature of Orthop- 
teroid insects, but the 10th sternum does not form the entire 
ventral surface of the paraprocts and sometimes only a very 
small part of it. 

Chopard (17) first regarded the supra-anal plate as the 
tergum of seg. 11, but in his later and more extensive work (’20) 
he accepts Heymons’ view that an eleventh segment is present 
in the embryo, between the 10th and the supra-anal plate. 
But, whereas Heymons believes that no part of the 11th 
segment persists after embryonic life, except the cerci, Chopard 
considers the sternum of that segment to be represented in 
the paraprocts, as described above, and considers the supra- 
anal plate to be a telson, without a sternal counterpart. As my 
own investigations have been confined to the study of the 
postembryonic stages I have nothing of value to contribute 
towards the solution of this problem. I may point out, how- 
ever, that the paraprocts do not represent the sternum of 
Heymons’ 11th segment, and if this segment is recognized at 
all it should be recognized in its entirety, including both tergal 
and sternal regions. 


8 Annals Entomological Society of America  |Vol. XV, 


HOMOLOGIES OF THE MALE AND FEMALE ORGANS. 


As already pointed out in Part I, the lateral gonapophyses 
or dorsal valvule of the female are prolongations of the coxites 
of the 9th segment, the styli when present being borne upon 
their apices; but, except in the Thysanura and many Odonata, 
sooner or later becoming lost or absorbed during development. 
The anterior and posterior gonapophyses are homoplastic 
outgrowths, belonging to the 8th and 9th segments respectively, 
and, as found in their most primitive condition, in the Thy- 
sanura, they are borne upon, or near, the inner margins of the 
corresponding coxites, close to the bases of the latter. 


EnGaet IMKey PA 


Fig. 1. Nicoletia (Anelpistina) meinerti Silv., 8th sternum of female. 
(From Berlese, after Silvestri). 


Fig. 2. Machilis polypoda, 8th and 9th sterna of male. 
(From Berlese, after Silvestri). 


In the Machiloidea and Lepismoidea the coxites of segment 
9 are similar in the two sexes and the sternite has practically 
disappeared, except in a few Lepismids, such as Nicoletia, in 
which there is a well developed sternite in the female only 
(Escherich, ’05), (Text fig. 1). The posterior gonapophyses are 
represented by the parameres, which are best developed in the 
Machiloidea and such Lepismoidea as Nicoletia and Atelura 
(Escherich, 1. c.) As a rule no structures corresponding to 
the anterior gonapophyses are present in the male, but Silvestri 
(nec Berlese, 06) shows clearly in a figure of the male of Machilts 


1922] Walker: Structure of Orthopteroid Insects 9 


polypoda (Fig. 2), two pairs of parameres, of which the smaller 
anterior pair arises from the 8th segment in a position cor- 
responding nearly with that of the anterior gonapophyses of 
the female. Verhoeff (’10) also refers to both pairs of parameres 
as the male homologues of the two pairs of female gonopods 
(anterior and posterior gonapophyses), having abandoned his 
earlier attempt (’03) to show that the anterior pair of parameres 
are fused in Machilis and Lepisma to form the penis. 


Female Gonapophyses. Male Homologues. 


Ant. gonapophyses or ventral valves—true or posterior para- 
meres, or ‘‘telopodites’”’ 
OF ser. 9: 


Post. gonapophyses or inner valves—anterior parameres or 
‘‘telopodites”’ of seg. 8. 
(Present only in certain 
Machiloidea). 


Lat. gonapophyses or dorsal valves—coxites of seg. 9 (gono- 
coxites), (with styli), or 
equivalent parts of the 
9th coxosternum. 


Male gonapophyses are not always of similar origin in the 
various orders. In the Odonata the two plates covering the 
genital aperture are homologues of the lateral gonapophyses 
of the female, as shown by their development (Van der Weele, 
’06) and are therefore vestigial coxites. 

The question as to whether the parameres of the Thysanura 
and those of Orthopteroid insects* are homologous or not is 
more difficult to decide. The former are primarily attached 
to the 9th coxites, having a more or less posterior position, close 
to the intersegmental membrane. They are thus ventral to 
the penis. Those of Pterygote insects, in what appears to be 
their most primitive form, arise from the walls of the penis 
(Dermaptera), or from the same situation together with parts 
of the intersegmental membrane (some Ephemerida), having 
generally a lateral or dorso-lateral position, but sometimes a 
ventral one. This difference of position throws some doubt on 
the homologies of these structures with those of the Thysanura, 
but such a shifting of position is by no means unusual, and as 


* These have been also termed ‘‘penis-valves,’’ (Crampton, ’20d). 


10 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


they seem to be characteristic of a very primitive type of 
genitalia, they are probably structures of ancient origin, whose 
representatives we should expect to find in the Thysanura. 
It seems best, therefore, not to distinguish these structures by 
different terms until further light is thrown upon their origin. 


ices 


Fig. 3. Ventral views of terminal abdominal segments, illustrating homologies 
of male and female structures (semi-diagrammatic). a, Machilis, male; 
b, hypothetical Pterygote type male; c, Ephemerid male; d, Grylloblatia, 
immature male; e, Blattid, male, based on Periplaneta; f, Tettigoniid immature 
male of Neoconocephalus; g, Machilis, female; h, hypothetical Pterygote 
type, female; i, Grylloblatta, immature female; j, Blattid, immature female of 
Parcoblatta; vd, dorsal valvule; vi, inner valvule; vv, ventral valvule. 
For other lettering, see page 71. 


1922] Walker: Structure of Orthopteroid Insects Te 


SPECIAL MORPHOLOGY. 


In describing the male genitalia and associated parts 1n the 
various orders it will be convenient to take them in a different 
sequence from that followed in the discussion of the female 
organs. 


Ephemerida. 


This group is remarkable for several reasons. The pro- 
longation of the supra-anal plate into a jointed caudal filament 
or cerciform appendage (‘‘telofilum,’’ Crampton), similar 
to that of certain Thysanura has been already referred to in 
Part I. The cerci are longer than in the females, but are 
otherwise similar. The paraprocts are unchitinized and are 
covered by the 10th tergum, there being no distinct 10th 
sternum. 


The 9th sternum is very large and is usually divided trans- 
versely into two separate plates, of which the distal one is 
prolonged into a pair of processes, divided into several segments 
and serving as claspers. These processes are generally con- 
sidered to be jointed styli, but it is possible that the terminal 
segments alone represent the styli, the remaining segments 
belonging to the coxites, which are also represented by the 
distal of the two sternal plates (the coxale), the proximal one 
being the sternite. The fact that these structures serve as 
claspers in copulation and that in Grylloblatta the coxites are 
apparently claspers lends some support to this view. Moreover 
they contain muscles, which in the Thysanura and Orthopteroid 
insects only reach the bases of the styli. In some cases the 
coxites are completely separate, as in Blasturus nebulosus Walk. 
(Pl. I, Fig. 2) or Callibaetis ferrugineus Walsh. (Pl. I, Fig. 4), 
i..e., the distal plate is divided by a median suture. In others 
(Heptagenia spp.) a tripartite division is slightly indicated, the 
two stylus-bearing parts being indistinctly separated by a 
median area. 


There are two penes, whose walls may be wholly mem- 
branous or accompanied by parameres. In Callibaetis ferru- 
gineus, e. g., (Pl. I, Fig. 4) these take the form of slender 
chitinous bands, extending from the lateral margin of the 10th 
tergum obliquely mesad and cephalad to the bases of the 
penes, thence curving along the lateral margins of the penes 


12 Annals Entomological Society of America  [Vol. XV, 


to their apices. Retraction of the penes is accompanied by 
the distal part of the parameres. 

In this species there is also a sclerite (vo) resembling the 
““subanal vomer’’ of the Phasmoidea, consisting of a transverse 
band of chitin immediately in front of the paraprocts, which 
is elevated in the middle into a rounded shelf-like projection. 
On each side the chitin is expanded into a thin plate, which 
extends to the basal portions of the parameres. In Blasturus 
nebulosus (Pl. I, Fig. 3) and B. cupidus each penis bears a single 
hook arising ventrally near the apex and curved proximad. 
These have been termed “‘subappendicule’’ by Crampton, but 
they appear to represent the distal parts of parameres. Para- 
meres have also been described in Heptagenia venosa by Pey- 
toureau (’95) who termed them “‘aiguillons.’’ In other genera, 
such as Hexagenia, they are wholly absent. 


Dermaptera. 


In the Earwigs the large forcipate cerci are associated with 
modifications of the neighboring sclerites, although the penis 
retains an apparently primitive structure. The only exception 
is the aberrant parasitic form Hemimerus talpoides Walk., in 
which the cerci are simple and styliform. Segmented cerci 
occur in the immature stages of Dyscritina and Dzplatys, 
(Burr, °11, Zacher, ’11), a fact that indicates the more primitive 
nature of this type of structure. 

Correlated with the unusual development of the cerci is the 
enlargement of the 10th tergum, but there is no marked 
abbreviation of two preceding terga, such as occurs in the 
females, and all the terga are free. The 9th sternum is well 
developed, undivided and without styli. The paraprocts and 
so-called ‘‘opisthomeres’’ or segments of the supra-anal plate 
are similar to those of the female. The latter may vary in 
number from two to four, and as the larger numbers occur 
only in primative genera, it would appear that they are part of the 
expression of this primitive condition. They cannot be con- 
sidered as vestigial metameres, as there is no evidence for the 
existence of more than eleven true metameres in the abdomen 
of any insects, but they may possibly represent the vestige of a 
jointed, caudal filament, like that of the Ephemerida. 

In the superfamilies Protodermaptera and Paradermaptera 
the penis is double or deeply bipartite, the two ejaculatory ducts 


1922] Walker: Structure of Orthopteroid Insects 13 


opening separately, and being thus merely continuations of the 
vasa deferentia. In the Eudermaptera there is but one penis, 
apparently due to the complete suppression of the other. In 
Forficula auricularia L. the vasa deferentia unite at the base of 
the penis with a small sac, from which a single ejaculatory duct 
leads to the apex of the penis. There is, however, a vestigial 
second ejaculatory duct, which has no external opening, indi- 
cating an originally bipartite penis. In Hemimerus talpoides 
the sole representative of the aberrant suborder Hemimerina, 
there is a single penis, which when everted possesses two 
apertures. The vasa deferentia unite to form a single short 
ejaculatory duct, which near the termination of the penis 
divides again. 

In all the Dermaptera there is a single pair of unsegmented, 
chitinized parameres, which generally arise from the dorsal and 
lateral surface of the penis or penes, proximad of the praeputial 
sacs, although sometimes their position is ventral, as in Hem- 
imerus (Heymons, 712). The parameres exhibit great variation 
in length, form and details of structure. Apart from the 
parameres and virga, which is often present in the form of a 
very slender eversible spine, the penis may be entirely mem- 
branous or chitinized in part. 


Plecoptera. 


In the Stone-flies the general form of the terminal segments 
and cerci is similar in the two sexes. The ninth sternum of the 
male is more or less enlarged to form a hypandrium, but is 
undivided and devoid of styli. The tenth segment is frequently 
ring-like, owing apparently to the meeting and fusing of the 
tergal margins in the mid-ventral line rather than to the fusion 
of terga and sterna, since in some forms the tergal margins are 
but narrowly separated. The tenth tergum is sometimes 
produced caudally, or elevated, or mesially divided, in which 
case the two parts, or ‘““hemitergites,’’ may bear hooks, as in 
Arcynopteryx americana (Klapalek, ’12, Fig. 18), or they may 
be prolonged cephalad over the preceding terga, which are 
grooved to receive them. I have not found a distinct tenth 
sternum in any of the forms examined. 

The supra-anal plate may be insignificant or almost vestigial, 
or it may, on the other hand, exhibit remarkable modifications. 
In Capnia vernalis Newp. (Pl. II, Figs. 11-18) it is prolonged 


14 Annals Entomological Society of America  [Vol. XV, 


into a huge spout-like organ, which is bent upwards and forwards 
over the terga of the ninth and tenth segments. This structure 
(spc) consists of a tubular process with a spear-shaped extremity 
and rests in another more flattened trough-like piece. The two 
are received into a mid-dorsal groove on segments 9 and 10 
and their free extremities are apparently received into a notch 
under cover of the elevated and slightly produced edge of the 
Sth tergum. If we examine the ventral surface of this peculiar 
structure, which is evidently a sperm-conveyor, we see that its 
base 1s marked off from the rest of the supra-anal plate by a 
transverse suture; under the edge of which is the proximal 
opening into the lumen of the sperm-conveyor. Leading from 
the opening of the ejaculatory duct is a groove with thickened 
sides, which passes between the flat paraprocts and along the 
ventral surface of the supra-anal plate, to the opening of the 
sperm-conveyor. This is evidently a seminal groove, along 
which the spermatic fluid is conducted from the ejaculatory 
duct into the sperm-conveyor through the proximal opening 
of. the latter... There isno.true penisiancthis species: 

In the Pteronarcine and some, at least, of the Perlineze 
(Perlodini) there is a somewhat similar modification of the 
supra-anal plate, differing from that of Capnia, however, in 
that the median part is deeply invaginated into a pocket, so 
that- there is no prominent, “projecting external Structure: 
In some species of Pteronarcys, according to Smith (17), this 
structure serves as a sperm-conveyor, while in others it is 
apparently modified for another function, that of a “‘ probe-like 
- organ in opening up the genital passages of the female.’”’ In 
the Perlodini its function is generally, if not always, more of the 
latter nature, serving apparently as a titillator or copulatory 
hook. In both groups the structure is similar enough to indicate 
a common origin. 

In Isogenus frontalis Newm. (Pl. II, Figs. 14-17), which 
I have taken as an example of this type, there is a deep, narrow, 
median invagination of the tenth tergal region, as well as the 
supra-anal plate. The tenth tergum is thus divided into 
two ‘‘hemi-tergites,’’ each of which is somewhat thickened at 
its mesocaudal angle, where it bears a few denticles. In other 
species of this group these angles may be raised into hook-like 
projections (e. g., Arcynopteryx americana, Klapalek, op. cit.) 
The invaginated part of the tenth tergum forms a large median 


1922] Walker: Structure of Orthopteroid Insects 15 


apodeme (map). The supra-anal plate (Fig. 16) consists of a 
pocket, whose walls are partly membranous, partly differen- 
tiated into separate sclerites, which are moved by intrinsic 
muscles (vide Smith, op. cit.) On each side of the opening 
of the sac is a somewhat triangular plate, termed by Smith the 
para-genital plates (pg) which seem to be the homologues of 
the two dorsal basal parts of the supra-anal plate of Capnza. 
In the mouth of the sac can be seen a median chitinous hook 
(mst) and a pair of lateral rods or styles (Ist). These are 
termed by Smith the median and lateral stylets. They are all 
connected at base with a strong bar, which bounds the sac in 
front and joins the base of the median apodeme of the tenth 
tergum. The copulatory hook, or median stylet, is the “‘titil- 
lator’’ of other species, of such genera as Arcynopteryx and 
Skobeleva (Klapalek, ’12), in some members of which it has the 
form of a long slender spine. 


The supra-anal plate is subject to still other modifications, 
such as, e. g., in Acroneuria brevipennis (Crampton, ’18), in 
which it bears a pair of well-developed hooks, while in other. 
forms, such as Isoperla sp. (Pl. II, Fig. 18) it is wholly without 
special modifications, and even imperfectly differentiated. 


As it is evident that these modifications have developed 
within the order, no attempt need be made to homologise them 
with similar structures found in other orders. Crampton (’18) 
has compared the appendage of the supra-anal plate (sperm- 
conveyor) of Capnia to the slightly similar horn-like projection 
of the tenth tergum in certain Odonata (Ischnura) and remarks 
that although not strictly homologous “it is unnecessary to 
apply different names to the two structures, which are prac- 
tically the same in their nature and position on the tergal region 
of the segment bearing them.’’ So far from being “‘ practically 
the same,’’ they are not only borne by different segments, but 
are adapted to wholly different functions, that of Capnia being 
a sperm-conveyor, while that of Ischnura is a brace which fits 
upon the mesosternal lamina of the female in copulation. 
Crampton also labels the furcate appendage of the supra-anal 
plate of Scudderia furcata Brunn. with the same abbreviation 
as he uses for the structures just mentioned, though this is 
also quite different in nature from either of the others, being a 
development within the Tettigoniid subfamily Phaneropterine. 


16 Annals Entomological Society of America  [Vol. XV, 


The paraprocts are generally well developed, chitinized and 
fused with the bases of the cerci, although in the nymphs of 
some forms and also the adults of others they may be more 
distinctly separated. Frequently they bear copulatory append- 
ages in the form of hooks, as in Jsoperla sp. (Pl. II, Fig. 18), or 
of long processes which fit together into a spout-like organ 
(Dictyopterygella, teste Klapalek, ’12). Crampton’s figure of 
Acroneuria brevipennis shows a pair of small hooks on the 
paraprocts in addition to the larger ones borne by the supra- 
anal plate. 

Owing to lack of material I have been unable to study 
satisfactorily the penis of the Plecoptera. When present it is 
usually single, but according to Crampton, the bipartite form 
occurs in some forms, such as Nemoura completa Walk. (1. c., 
Pl. II, Fig. 16). In this figure processes resembling parameres 
are represented. In some cases it is membranous and eversible, 
in others it is partly chitinized, and it may be provided with a 
virga, as in Perlesta flavida (Crampton, 1. c., Pl. II, Fig. 14). In 
Perla tristis Hag. it is a large, stout structure of simple rounded 
form, with a rather large terminal aperture, (PI. II, Figs. 19, 20). 
The distal part of the ejaculatory duct has longitudinally 
folded walls and is darker than the rest of the organ. There are 
no parameres nor other chitinous parts. 


Embiidina. 


The only species, males of which I have studied, is the 
widely distributed Oligotoma saundersit Westw., but the 
numerous figures in Enderlein’s monograph of the order (Ender- 
lein, 12) afford a basis for a more general survey of the genitalia 
of this group. 

The most primitive form is undoubtedly the large South 
American Clothoda nobilis Gerst., which is remarkable for the 
symmetry of the terminal abdominal structures, and for the 
lack of the various copulatory processes, so strikingly developed 
in all the other genera. In most of the Embiids there is a 
shortening of the ninth abdominal tergum and an enlargement 
of the tenth, somewhat suggestive of the Dermaptera. In 
Clothoda the tenth tergum is short, symmetrical and entire, 
while in all the other genera it is more or less enlarged and 
deeply divided into two asymmetrical parts (hemitergites), 
which are sometimes completely separated. In the great 


1922] Walker: Structure of Orthopteroid Insects 17 


majority of forms each hermitergite bears a more or less hook- 
like copulatory appendage, but these may differ very greatly 
in form and position. In Oligotoma saundersit, e. g., the dextral 
hook is much longer and differently shaped from the sinistral 
one (PI. I, Figs. 9 and 10). 

The ninth sternum is entire and without styli, and, except 
in Clothoda, is asymmetrical, the apex being well to the left 
of the median line and bearing another copulatory process. 
The asymmetry also involves the cerci, which are two- 
segmented, without including the basipodites. These sclerites 
are generally inconspicuous, but in Clothoda they are well 
developed, extending mesad in the form of freely projecting 
plates, somewhat suggestive of the paraprocts of certain 
Plecoptera, such as Perla. One might, in fact, be tempted to 
interpret the latter as greatly enlarged cercal basipodites rather 
than as true paraprocts. In Oligotoma the left basipodite 
bears still another copulatory appendage on its inner side. 
These various copulatory appendages converge on the left 
side of the middle line, their position suggesting that in copula- 
tion the abdomen of the female is grasped by the male from the 
right side. 

Of the supra-anal plate, paraprocts and penis I have been 
able to find nothing in Oligotoma. They must be extremely 
vestigial if present at all, although the paraprocts are quite 
distinct in the females of this order. 

It is altogether probable that the special characteristics 
of the male Embiids, i. e., the asymmetry and the development 
of the various copulatory appendages, have been evolved within 
the history of the group itself, since its most primitive living 
member, Clothoda, is lacking in these very features. Accepting 
this view it is useless to attempt to homologise these processes 
with those of similar function occurring in other orders. 

The male genitalia of the Embiide offer little or no evidence 
as to their relationships with other orders, but there is nothing 
in their structure to conflict with the view held by MacLachlan, 
Crampton and others that their nearest affinities are with the 
Plecoptera. In fact, in the development of copulatory append- 
ages from a great variety of parts, they at least show similar 
tendencies to the Plecoptera, especially in the division of the 
tenth tergum into hermitergites, each bearing a hook, a feature 
which has already been noted in the case of the Plecopteran 
genus Arcynopteryx, and is by no means confined to that genus. 


18 Annals Entomological Socieyt of America  [Vol. XV, 


Orthoptera. 


In the Orthoptera there is a tendency toward a shortening 
of the posterior terga, which is most marked in the Acridoidea, 
while the anal plates are usually well developed but very variable 
in form. The supra-anal plate is frequently fused with the 
tenth tergum, but not overlapped nor replaced by the latter as 
in the Blattoidea, Mantoidea and Isoptera, although in certain 
Tettigonoidea (Ceuthophilus) the ninth tergum (more rarely 
the 8th) projects over the tenth and supra-anal plate, thus 
having the appearance of being the last dorsal segment. The 
cerci are with rare exceptions unsegmented and short, being 
frequently modified as claspers. A small cercal basipodite is 
usually present. The ninth sternum is generally entire, 
forming a hypandrium, but in the Acridoidea it is divided by a 
transverse suture, as in the Phasmoidea, the distal plate 
probably representing the fused coxites. Secondary sub- 
divisions may also occur in some Tettigonoidea. In this super- 
family styli are generally present, but they are absent in all the 
other groups. 

Owing to the peculiar and often extremely complex structure 
of the genitalia it will be convenient to deal with these separately 
after having discussed the other structures with which we are 
concerned. 


The Terminal Segments, Cerci and Styli. 


TETTIGONOIDEA. In most of the long-horned grasshoppers 
the abdominal segments are not greatly specialized, the terga 
and sterna being distinct and separate, the latter rather feebly 
chitinized, and the spiracles occupying the pleural membrane. 
There is usually relatively little shortening of the 9th and 10th, 
although sometimes, as in Ceuthophilus, the 10th is small, 
subvertical and concealed by the projecting 9th tergum, 
which is thus commonly but erroneously termed the supra-anal 
plate by systematists. The true supra-anal plate is of variable 
size, but generally inconspicuous, and frequently fused with the 
tenth tergum in the adult insect. It is not divided trans- 
versely, or otherwise, as in many Acrididze. The paraprocts 
are commonly lobe-like and but little chitinized. The ninth 
sternum is typically undivided, though indications of the 
coxites are sometimes seen in the more or less bifid caudal 


1922| Walker: Structure of Orthopteroid Insects 19 


margin of many forms, this feature being particularly noticeable 
in young nymphs and sometimes, as in species of Ceuthophilus, 
secondary subdivisions are present. Styli are present in the 
majority of genera, though frequently absent, as in many of 
the Rhaphidophorine, which in this respect, and also in the more 
convex and upturned ninth sternum, the unmodified cerci and 
the structure of the genitalia, approach the Grylloidea. The 
cerci are generally short, unsegmented and modified to serve as 
claspers in copulation, but in the Rhaphidophorine, with few 
exceptions, they do not function as such, being like those of the 
female, comparatively long, flexible and tapering, and covered 
with sensory hairs. In some species of this family, such as 
Pristoceuthophilus cercalis Caud., the cerci have a few small 
terminal segments, but this character, though an interesting 
exception to the general rule in the Orthoptera, is probably 
an atavistic one. A small cercal basipodite is sometimes, but 
not always, present. In the large membranous area between 
the paraprocts and the ninth sternum is the penis, which is 
described below. 

In Cyphoderris monstrosa Uhl., (Pl. IV, Figs. 35, 36) an 
aberrant species, usually placed in the Stenopelmatine, a most 
remarkable modification of the genital structures is present. 
The ninth sternum is bent vertically upwards and closely 
applied to the end of the abdomen, which it covers below the 
paraprocts. Into the narrow pocket thus formed opens the 
genital passage, whose folded, membranous lips are the only 
representative of the penis, there being no chitinized parts. 
There is, however, in place of the titillators or parameres, a 
large process arising from the 9th sternum. It projects some- 
what backward and is then sharply bent downward, terminating 
below in a pair of divergent spines. The dorsal surface also 
bears minute spinules. In a nearly full-grown male nymph 
of this species there is no indication of this structure, and the 
sternum, though bent up, is less closely applied to the body. 
In both adult and nymph there is a pair of stout, flattened 
styli, which, from their position, are at first sight, somewhat 
suggestive of titillators. 

GRYLLOIDEA. In the crickets the abdominal segments are 
similar to those of the Tettigonoidea, except that the ninth 
sternum is smaller, more narrowed caudally, and envelopes the 
genitalia more closely, there being a smaller outlet for the 


20 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


genital cavity; and there is no trace of styli. The inner surface 
of the sternum is covered by a much folded glandular epithelium. 
The cerci are not modified as claspers, and are longer, flexible, 
with long hairs and sensilla, although unsegmented. There 
is a small external cercal basipodite. In all these respects they 
are approached by the Tettigontid subfamily Rhaphidophorine. 
The anal plates are generally more prominent and heavily 
chitinized than in the Tettigonoidea. The supra-anal plate 
is undivided and is sometimes, as in Gryllus and Nemobius, 
indistinctly separated from the tenth tergum. 


More important characters are found in the genitalia 


(ev) 

TRIDACTYLOIDEA. The outstanding characteristics of the 
males of this group, apart from the penis, are the weakening 
and infolding of the posterior abdominal terga, particularly 
those of segments 8, 9 and 10, which are more or less concealed 
by the overlapping 7th tergum, the dorsal lengths of segments 
8 and 9 being greatly reduced by the obliquity of their hind 
margins; the styliform and sometimes two-jointed cerci, the 
long moveable processes of the paraprocts and the absence of 
true styli.* 

In Tridactylus apicalis Say the terga are mesially grooved 
with steeply sloping sides, and the 9th is divided and concealed 
by the 8th, except towards the lateral margins. The 10th is 
much larger but is likewise divided by the median groove, 
and the supra-anal plate is also sulcate with only the lateral 
margins strongly chitinized. The paraprocts are chitinized 
and bear a pair of slender, styliform processes, like those of the 
female. The sterna are wider than the terga, the 9th forming 
a flattened and undivided hypandrium. 


In Ripipteryx the general characteristics of the terga are 
similar but with marked variations according to the species. 


* Crampton (’20d) considers these styliform appendages as probably true 
styli, belonging to seg. 11, the paraprocts representing the coxites of that segment. 
If these processes were true styli we should expect.to find them in some other 
groups of Orthopteroid insects besides the Tridactylide, as well as in the Thy- 
sanura, in which styli sometimes occur on nearly all of the abdominal segments. 
It is noteworthy, however, that even in such Thysanura as Machilis, in which the 
styli are seen in their most primitive and best developed condition. they are 
absent from the 10th segment and paraprocts. The development of styliform 
processes in connection with the genitalia is very common in insects and the 
presence of these processes in this single small group of Orthoptera is an 
insufficient basis for speculation as to their origin. 


1922] Walker: Structure of Orthopteroid Insects 21 


In R. carbonaria Sauss., the only species I have examined, the 
9th tergum, is the only one that is divided. The 10th and 
supra-anal plate are both of large size, though somewhat 
sulcate and weakened mesially. The 9th sternum forms a 
large, somewhat convex hypandrium, and is almost completely 
fused with the tergum. The cerci are simple and styliform 
with a distinct basipodite. Just beneath each is a chitinous 
hook, which apparently belongs to the paraprocts, but is 
perhaps developed from the cercal basipodite. It is also shown 
in de Saussure and Zehntner’s figure of R. cyanipennis (op. cit., 
Pl. XVII, Fig. 34). The long processes of the paraprocts in 
R. carbonaria Sauss. and R. forceps Sauss., are remarkable 
for their modification as copulatory forceps. They are long 
and stout, with thickened apices, abruptly bent inwards. 

In R. mexicanus Sauss., according to the figure of de Saussure 
and Zehntner (1. c., Pl. XVII, Fig. 30), the cerci are indistinctly 
divided into nine segments, but it seems probable, on comparison 
with other species, that this segmentation is not a primitive 
condition. In this species and others, such as R. cyanipennis 
Sauss., the processes of the paraprocts are not modified to 
serve as claspers. 

ACRIDOIDEA. In the locusts the hind margins of the last 
two or three abdominal terga are increasingly oblique caudad, 
this obliquity being associated with a marked shortening of 
their mid-dorsal lengths, as compared with their lateral margins. 
These features, together with the large, more or less upcurved 
ninth sternum, result in a general upturning of the end of the 
abdomen, the opening of the genital cavity facing dorsad 
instead of caudad. In respect of the shortening and obliquity 
of the terga, the group may be compared with the Tridactyl- 
oidea, the resemblance to which is greatest in the Acrydiide 
(Tettigide), but is even here not very marked. 

The segments are all separate in the Acrydiidz, but in the 
Acrididz the 9th and 10th terga are laterally fused, as in the 
females. A median furcate appendage, the furcula, is sometimes 
borne by the latter, as in Melanoplus. The large, usually 
triangular supra-anal plate is primarily divided by a trans- 
verse suture, as in the female (see Part I), but in the adults 
this division is frequently lost.* The peculiar subdivision of 

* Chopard (’20) has given good reasons for considering this transverse suture 


to be the true boundary between the 9th and 10th terga, the apparent boundary 
being a secondary ridge. 


22 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


this plate in the Acrydiide, described in the account of the 
females, is present also in the males; and the cerci in this family 
are also similar in the two sexes. In the Acridide they are 
usually larger in the male, serving as claspers in copulation, 
although often but little modified. In the Acridine and 
Oedipodine, e. g., they are small, simple and styliform, while 
in the Locustine they assume a considerable variety of forms, 
sometimes being forcipate, asin the Old World genus Calliptamus, 
but never, so far as I am aware, armed with teeth or spines, as in 
the Tettigonoidea. There is a distinct cercal basipodite in all 
of the forms examined. The paraprocts are broad and flat 
as in the females. 

The structure of the ninth sternum is very peculiar. It is 
very large, externally convex and upturned, and divided 
transversely as in the Phasmoidea, the distal plate, commonly 
known as the subgenital plate, possibly representing the fused 
coxites. . This plate has sometimes been mistermed the tenth 
sternite. Its margin forms the rim of a deep genital cavity, 
roofed over by a fold of integument, the pallium, which is 
continuous with the sternal margins, and together with the 
paraprocts, usually completely conceals the genitalia, although 
in some species in which the penis is very long the pallium is 
pushed up into a conical form, the tip of the penis being exposed. 
In the Acrydiide the pallium is more firmly chitinized than 
in the Acridide, its dorsal surface being covered with a pair 
of plates separated by a median groove. In Acrydium (Tettix) 
and Paratettix there lie in this groove two slender rods, which 
terminate near the front margin in a pair of small hooks, 
resembling titillators and probably serving a similar purpose, 
the usual titillators (parameres) being absent in this family 
(Pl. VI, Fig. 60). In Tettigidea (T. lateralis parvipennis Harr., 
Pl. VI, Figs. 58, 59) these hooks are absent, but the pallium is 
still more heavily chitinized than in Acrydium, being a decidedly 
plate-like structure, divided into right and left parts by a median 
suture. Morphologically the pallium is part of the primitive 
floor of the genital cavity. Styli are absent in the Acridoidea, 
although there are some forms, like Acrydium, in which two 
small tubercles on the caudal margin of the ninth sternum are 
somewhat suggestive of vestigial styl. 


1922] Walker: Structure of Orthopteroid Insects 23 


The Genitalia. 


The male genitalia of the Orthoptera exhibit an even wider 
range of variation than do those of the females, but, as in the 
latter, a fundamentally similar plan of structure can be traced 
in these organs throughout the order, except in a few cases in 
which they are very degenerate. This plan of structure is 
characteristic of the Orthoptera sens. str., and is widely different 
from other orthopteroid groups. Its most distinctive feature 
is the presence of a pouch or sac into which the ejaculatory duct 
opens and from the roof or walls of which the parameres arise. 
The sac has the function in very many forms of a spermatophore 
sac, and this is probably its primitive purpose. 

The penis is commonly large and prominent and its orifice 
is generally wide with folded walls, there being usually a pair 
of ventral lobes, or sometimes a single one. The titillators, or 
parameres, as I believe them-to be, are primitively dorso- 
terminal in position, but their bases are usually more or less 
retracted, so that they may appear to have no relation to the 
dorsal surface, being in some cases almost completely concealed 
from view. 


Owing to the shifting of the genital area from a ventral to a 
posterior position by the elongation of the ninth sternum the 
penis comes to lie under the paraprocts, and is also typically 
under cover of a projecting plate, the pseudosternite, which 
forms an arch over its base and serves for the origin of muscles 
concerned in its movements. This arch is often prolonged on 
each side into a pair of arms, the rami, partly encircling the 
penis at its base, and more or less produced inwardly into 
processes, which may be termed endapophyses, for the attach- 
ment of muscles concerned in the movements of the penis. 
Sometimes the endapophyses may be separated from the 
pseudosternite and are present in many forms (Tettigoniida), in 
which the latter has disappeared. In the Acridoidea these 
structures are further complicated, but their peculiarities need 
not be considered here. 

In addition to the structures just described there may be 
mentioned also a pair of glandular pouches, lined with chitin, 
which open separately or by a common duct into the ejaculatory 
duct, close to its termination in the spermatophore sac. It is 
sometimes represented by a single sac and is probably connected 


24 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


with the formation of the spermatophore, as it is absent in 
the Acridide and Tridactylide, in which apparently no sperm- 
atophores are formed. 

TETTIGONOIDEA. With the exception of the aberrant Sten- 
opelmatine Cyphoderris monstrosa Uhl., and probably other 
Stenopelmatine, in which the penis is degenerate, the male 
genitalia of the Tettigonoidea, as represented by the forms 
studied, may be divided into two types, the one represented 
by the Rhaphidophorine, the other by the Decticinez, Cono- 
cephaline, Copiphorine, Phaneropterine, Tettigoniinze, Meco- 
nemine and probably by most of.the other subfamilies. 


Fic. 4. 


Fig. 4. Genitalia of male Orthoptera, dorsal views (diagrammatic); a, Tetti- 
goniid, based on Ceuthophilus (parameres. partly everted); b, Tettigoniid, 
based on Neduba; c, Gryllid, based on Gryllus; d, Acridid, based on Dissosteira. 
For lettering, see page 71. 


The first type is the more primitive and may be illustrated 
by the genus Ceuthophilus. Figs. 22-25 show various views of 
the penis of C. lapidicola Burm. In this type the penis is almost 
entirely membranous, as are also the parameres, which in 
C. lapidicola are only slightly chitinized proximally along their 
mesial surfaces, the narrow chitinized areas coalescing at base 
to form a single sclerite. In the resting condition (Fig. 22) the 
posterior wall of the penis is invaginated, forming the sperma- 
tophore sac, into the lower part of which the ejaculatory duct 
opens (gp). The upper part is marked off from the lower by a 
slight transverse fold (fps), above which is seen the plate 
formed by the united bases of the parameres (pmb), which 
being partly inverted, are otherwise invisible in this position. 
The fold (fps) corresponds to the floor of the ‘‘paramere sac”’ 
in Neduba, etc. (see p. 27). In Fig. 25, of Pl. III, which was 


1922] Walker: Structure of Orthopteroid Insects 25 


drawn from a potash preparation, they are shown in a com- 
pletely inverted position, but this is a position that is prevented 
in life by the mass of muscles which surround the spermatophore 
sac. 

The mouth of the spermatophore sac is bounded below by a 
single, large ventral lobe, which is slightly chitinized and 
densely spinulose. In the retracted condition a deep transverse 
pocket is formed beneath the ventral lobe. 


pst 


IPTGeos 


Fig. 5. Genitalia of male Orthoptera, diagrammatic median sagittal sections. 
The dotted lines indicate structures not in the median plane. a, Ceuthophilus, 
retracted; b, same, everted; c, Neduba; d, Gryllid, based on Gryllus; 
e, Acridid, based on Dissosteira and Melanoplus. For lettering, see page 71. 


On the roof of the penis there is a pair of small openings with 
chitinized margins, leading into narrow tubules (Fig. 25), which 
appear in sections to be partly glandular, but whose lining 
cuticle is minutely pubescent. In sections of specimens with 
everted parameres they are drawn backwards into the cavities 
of the latter. These structures have apparently no homologues 
in the other types of Orthoptera studied. 


26 Annals Entomological Society of America  [Vol. XV, 


Over the base of the penis is the large hood-like pseudo- 
sternite, the concavity of which forms a sort of sheath into 
which the penis is retracted. The rami are not very distinctly 
developed externally, though connected with one another 
ventrally by a feebly chitinized arch. Their internal pro- 
jections or endapophyses, however, are large and prominent. 


In the everted position, the penis of this species (Pl. III, 
Figs. 23, 24), protrudes considerably from beneath the pseudo- 
sternite and the pocket beneath the ventral lobe is straightened 
out. The spermatophore sac is obliterated and the parameres 
appear as large divergent cornua, which as already stated, are 
only feebly chitinized proximally along their mesial surfaces. 


In this position Ceuthophilus illustrates well what appears 
to be the primitive, dorso-terminal position of the parameres 
in the Orthoptera. 


Fig. 26 is a posterior view of the end of the abdomen of 
C. aridus Brun., in which the roof of the invaginated penis is 
strongly retracted and folded ventrad in such a way as to 
expose the under surface of the pseudosternite. This has been 
forcibly elevated to show the lower margin, which is bent into 
a little arch, beneath which the ejaculatory duct passes, cov- 
ered also, of course, by the thin, collapsed roof of the penis. 
Although this figure differs greatly in appearance from those 
of C. lapidicola the genitalia are essentially similar in the two 
species, as far as can be seen in the retracted condition. 


Fig. 27 is a similar view of C. maculatus Harr., with the 
genitalia everted. The parameres are very small and there 
appear to be no openings on the roof of the penis. The pseudo- 
sternite is a heavily chitinized gable-like structure, with a 
median projection, and is prolonged ventrad into distinct rami. 
It is quite suggestive of certain Gryllide such as Gryllotalpa. 


The second type of genitalia differs from the first in the 
following features: 


1. The absence of the pseudosternite, or its reduction to a 
very slight membranous fold.* 


* A well developed pseudosternite, together with typical parameres, is figured 
by Chopard (’20) in Thyreonotus corsicus Ramb., a Decticine. Chopard, how- 
ever, regarded both structures as part of the ‘‘epiphallus.’’ The case is important 
in giving further conclusive evidence that the pseudosternite and parameres are 
different structures, a view that might otherwise be denied by those who would 
fail to recognize as parameres the introversible processes of Ceuthophilus. 


1922] Walker: Structure of Orthopteroid Insects maa 


2. The non-introversible chitinized parameres, whose bases 
are prolonged cephalad so as to reduce greatly, or even oblit- 
erate, the roof of the penis, and to occupy a sac of their own, 
the paramere sac, above the spermatophore sac. 

3. The median division of the ventral lobe into two folds, 
which are membranous and not pubescent. 

This type may be illustrated by Neduba carinata Walk., a 
member of the Decticinze. Posterior, dorsal and lateral views 
of this species are given in Figs. 29, 30 and 31. 

The pseudosternite is practically absent, only a slight, 
membranous fold being found in its place. The parameres are 
large cornua with slender, upcurved apices and stout bases, 
arising from the walls of the paramere sac, the floor of which 
is also somewhat chitinized. The paramere sac is comparatively 
large, the spermatophore sac rather small, at least when con- 
tracted, and the intervening fold is produced into a pair of 
short processes which are chitinized ventrally. The ventral 
lobes are, as usual in this type, wholly membranous. The 
glandular pouches, opening into the ejaculatory duct at its 
distal end, are of considerable size. 

Of the same general type are the genitalia of Conocephalus 
(C. brevipennis Scudd., Figs. 32, 33). They differ from those of 
Neduba in the form of the parameres, which are represented by 
a pair of thick, muscular ridges, arising from the floor and sides 
of the paramere sac. Along the edge of each ridge is a chitinized 
bar, which meets its fellow in front but diverges caudad, and 
curving ecto-dorsad around the end of the ridge, terminates in 
a short spine. These bars are covered with fine spinules. The 
ventral lobes are of large size and folded inwards to allow con- 
siderable expansion of the spermatophore sac. The septum 
between the paramere sac and the spermatophore sac is simple 
and unchitinized. The endapophyses are small and con- 
cealed beneath the penis, but have distinct inward processes. 
The glandular pouches opening into the ejaculatory duct are 
of large size and are lined with chitin. 

In the last nymphal instar of Conocephalus (Fig. 34) the 
penis has a simpler tubular form; the parameres, represented 
merely by the slightly chitinized, dorso-terminal edges of the 
orifice, being as yet not at all retracted, so that there is no 
paramere sac at this stage. The ventral lobes are divided into 
a larger outer and a smaller inner part. The former is dis- 


28 Annals Entomological Society of America |Vol. XV, 


tinctly chitinized at the margin, though it is apparently the 
part which in the adult becomes wholly membranous and bent 
inwards. The small, inner parts are less chitinized and are 
readily recognizable also in the adult. 

In Neoconocephalus ensiger Harr., Scudderia curvicauda 
DeGeer and other species of Scudderia the parameres have no 
projecting spines. In S. curvicauda they are reduced to a 
pair of rounded tubercles on the floor of the paramere sac, 
densely beset with spinules. They represent a highly specialized 
ty Pe. 

GRYLLOIDEA. The crickets are most remarkable for the 
complex structure of the spermatophore and its sac. As an 
example of the family we may first take the common field 
cricket, Gryllus assimilis Fabr. The adult genitalia of this 
species are shown in Figs. 37-39. 

The pseudosternite is readily recognized from its general 
resemblance to that of Ceuthophilus. As in this genus it is 
a hood-like structure overarching the penis, but it is much 
more .closely connected with the latter than in Ceuthophilus, 
forming what is virtually its chitinized dorsal surface. It 
terminates in three prongs (pc) which doubtless serve as the 
titillators and is connected laterally with the slender rami, 
which pass ventro-cephalad to the floor of the genital cavity. 
These are not produced into endapophyses. The ventral lobes 
are large flexible whitish flaps, enclosing a concavity in which 
the ampulla of the spermatophore rests after it has passed out 
of the spermatophore sac. The latter is a deep rounded pocket, 
whose roof and floor are formed of a single strip of thin chitin, 
bent around the end of the sac and projecting over its mouth 
in a pair of slender spines (vs), placed closely together. When 
the spermatophore is in place the filament is curved upwards 
around the end of the sac, and backwards along the middle of 
the upper surface, its lateral expansions covering the floor, and 
serving to anchor it. A narrow median groove in the roof, 
terminating between the two projecting spines, is the site where 
the duct is formed. 

Upon the roof of the spermatophore sac and beneath the 
pseudosternite are two arcuate bars, meeting one another in 
the middle line and continuous laterally with a pair of bars, 
which appear on the inner surface of the sac near its mouth. 
These curved bars are formed as evaginations of the roof of 


1922} Walker: Structure of Orthopteroid Insects 29 


the spermatophore sac, as can be seen clearly in transverse 
sections. From their muscular connections they appear to 
represent the bases of the parameres, and may be termed 
endoparameres (Fig. 37, pmb). With the parameres may 
also be associated the lateral bars already mentioned, and 
perhaps also the two lobes supported by triradiate sclerites, 
which are situated just beneath the lateral prongs of the pseudo- 
sternite, and which are also in close connection with the lateral 
bars (ectoparameres, Figs. 38, 39, pm). 

At first sight it would appear as though the spermatophore 
sac were the homologue of the paramere sac of the Tettigonoidea, 
but the latter structure 1s developed merely as a result of the 
enlargement and inward extension of the paramere bases, in 
consequence of their function as protrusible titillators, whereas 
in the Gryllide the parameres possess no such modification and 
have no bases other than the roof of the spermatophore sac itself. 

The paired glandular pouches, which open into the ejacu- 
latory duct near its termination, are similar to those of most 
Tettigonoidea, though somewhat smaller. 

The last nymphal stage of Gryllus shows some peculiar 
features. Figs. 40 and 41 are ventral and ventro-posterior 
views of the genitalia at this stage. The pseudosternite 
resembles that of the adult, except that its three prongs are 
very short and blunt. The ventral lobes appear as a flat, 
bilobed, chitinous flap, covering the site of the genital aperture, 
which has not yet appeared. Between the pseudosternite and 
the ventral lobes is the space that later becomes invaginated 
to form the spermatophore sac. The chitinous layer which 
lines the latter, and also the median groove and the two terminal 
points are already indicated, the last-named structures being 
relatively much larger and stouter and not yet separated into 
two parts. They are separated from the pseudosternite by a 
larger space than in the adult. There is at this stage no indica- 
tion of the parameres. 

It may be questioned whether the structures which I have 
identified as the parameres are the true homologues of these 
processes in, the. Tettigonoidea. They are the structures 
called ‘‘titillators’’ by de Saussure and Zehntner, while Chopard 
refers to them as the underside of the “ pseudépiphalle’’ (pseudo- 
sternite) and recognizes no homologues of the titillators or 
parameres (‘‘epiphallus’’). My reasons for identifying these 


30 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


structures with the parameres are (1) their origin as evaginations 
of the wall of the spermatophore sac (cf. Ceuthophilus), and (2) 
their muscular connections, which are comparable to those of 
other groups of Orthoptera. 

In Nemobius fasciatus DeGeer the male genitalia are sur- 
prisingly unlike those of Gryllus, considering how nearly related 
the genera are in other respects (Pl. V, Figs. 42, 43). The 
pseudosternite is partially retracted and adherent to the over- 
lying integument. It has no median process, but has two 
pairs of lateral ones, of which the upper may represent the 
median process of Gryllus, the lower ones the lateral processes 
of that genus. Between the lower pair is another pair of more 
flexible processes, evidently the homologues of the ectopara- 
meres of Gryllus. The pseudosternite extends down on each 
side at base, but is not narrowed into distinct rami. 

The remarkable feature of this form, however, is the sperm- 
atophore sac, which is really not a sac at all, as it does not 
become invaginated, but is merely longitudinally sulcate. At 
the distal end the plate which lines the “‘sac”’ is greatly con- 
tracted and has a very narrow channel, but farther proximad 
it is considerably expanded and much more broadly sulcate. 
The endoparameres take the form of long slender rods, which 
are divergent towards their free ends. They have the same 
origin as in Gryllus, viz., as evaginations of the wall of the 
spermatophore sac. As a result of the form of the spermato- 
phore sac the ventral lobes are far forward and completely 
hidden, the entire spermatophore sac lying behind them. 
They are also relatively smaller and less distinctly separated 
from one another than in Gryllus assimults. 

In Nemobius carolinus Scudd. the genitalia are very similar 
to those of N. fasciatus, but in the European UN. sylvestris Fab., 
according to Lespes (’55 b) there is some approach to Gryllus in 
the longitudinal curvature or slight invagination of the spermato- 
phore sac. 

In the tree-cricket Oecanthus nigricornis Walk. the genitalia 
are like those of Gryllus in most respects, (Pl. V, Figs. 44-46), 
differing chiefly in the following features: The pseudosternite 
has a pair of prominent internal projections just mesad of the 
bases of the endapophyses. These are only slightly 
indicated in Gryllus. The median prong is represented by a 
pair of processes close together, while the lateral prongs are 


1922] Walker: Structure of Orthopteroid Insects ail 


almost obsolete. The ectoparameres are broad, rounded and 
prominent, and are closely connected with the endoparameres, 
which are long, thin plates, extending forward almost to the 
end of the spermatophore sac, and are wholly separate from 
one another. They are lateral rather than dorsal in position, 
being formed by an infolding of the integument on each side of 
the spermatophore sac, whereas in Gryllus the infolding, though 
partly lateral, is mainly dorsal, the two endoparameres coales- 
cing in the middle line. In Oecanthus the entire endoparamere 
is a chitinized plate, in Gryllus only the arcuate edges are chit- 
inized. The anterior extremities of these plates in Oecanthus 
are free and each bears a slender outwardly projecting spur. 

The spermatophore sac of Oecanthus is long and compressed, 
but formed by an invagination similar to that of Gryllus. The 
roof of the sac is, however, much longer than the floor, the 
mouth being very oblique. The ventral lobes are similar to 
those of Gryllus. 

In Gryllotalpa, according to de Saussure and Zehntner (’94) 
the pseudosternite has somewhat the form of an anchor (hence 
the term ‘‘anchre’’ of these authors), being produced laterally 
into a pair of long arms which are evidently the rami. The 
distal prongs are lacking in this genus. 

TRIDACTYLOIDEA. Ripipteryx carbonarius Sauss. is the only 
species whose genitalia were studied (Pl. V, Figs. 47-50). On 
first examination there appear to be no chitinous parts, as 
these are almost wholly retracted, but in a cleared preparation 
a structure of some complexity was revealed. This structure 
is elongate and much depressed and consists of two flattened 
sacs, dorsal and ventral, connected at their posterior extrem- 
ities. The ejaculatory duct, which is distally rather wide, with 
distinctly chitinized walls, opens into the anterior end of the 
ventral sac, which thus seems to be the homologue of the 
spermatophore sac. No trace of lateral glandular pouches is 
present. The dorsal sac is covered with a thin plate, which is 
little chitinized except along the lateral margins, which*are 
produced cephalad into a pair of long, slender rods, apparently 
for the insertion of muscles, and at its posterior extremity, 
where there is a small plate or more heavily chitinized part of 
the roof of the sac, which barely projects over the genital 
aperture. The roof of the dorsal sac is evidently the pseudo- 
sternite but is so deeply retracted as to be almost wholly an 


oe Annals Entomological Society of America  |Vol. XV, 


internal structure. As in many Orthoptera, such as Gryllus, 
Nemobius and Ceuthophilus, the posterior, more exposed part 
is more heavily chitinized than the anterior, concealed portion. 
The lateral chitinized margins are also exposed towards their 
bases and represent the rami (cf. Nemobius), while the long, 
slender, internal processes are the endapophyses. The floor of 
the dorsal sac represents, of course, the roof of the penis. There 
appear to be no traces of parameres. 

On the whole the gentialia of Riprpteryx appear to approach 
those of Ceuthophilus more than any other of the types studied, 
though the pseudosternite recalls that of Nemobius to some 
extent. The simple dilatation representing the spermatophore 
sac suggests that of Ceuthophilus, or other Tettigoniids, and 
the deep pocket between the pseudosternite and the penis roof 
is also suggestive of this genus. Both of these are primitive 
characters. The long horizontal endapophyses, on the other 
hand, are more like those of the Acrididz, though the resem- 
blance may be quite superficial. The striking similarity between 
the female genitalia of Rzpipteryx and the Acridide is certainly 
not paralleled by the male genitalia. 

ACRIDOIDEA. In the family Acridide the genitalia are 
remarkable for: (1) the great development of the muscles and 
the chitinous parts which serve for their attachment; (2) the 
upright or subvertical position of the terminal part of the 
penis and. parameres, correlated with the upcurved, cup-like 
form of the ninth sternum; (3) the small size of the outlet of 
the penis; (4) the deeply retracted bases of the parameres 
(endoparameres), in the form of heavily chitinized wing-like 
expansions, and the vestigial spermatophore sac, of which 
they form the lateral walls; (5) the anterior position and 
complex form of the pseudosternite; (6) the large and strongly 
chitinized endapophyses, connected dorsally but separated 
from the pseudosternite; (7) the absence of the glandular 
pouches of the ejaculatory duct; and (8) the deep pocket 
between the penis and the floor of the genital cavity. 

To illustrate the genitalia of this family we can take the 
common Black-winged Grasshopper or Carolina Locust (Dzs- 
sosteira carolina L.) (Pl. VI, Figs. 51-54). In order to expose 
the pénis. at is necéssary : to remove ihe. pallium joretoldsor 
integument covering the genital cavity behind the paraprocts. 
The terminal part of the penis is now seen near the posterior 


1922] Walker: Structure of Orthopteroid Insects 3B 


end of the genital cavity, and having a subvertical instead of a 
horizontal position, due to the general upturning of the 
extremity of the abdomen. 

Under the flattened paraprocts les the pseudosternite, a 
transverse, heavily chitinized plate of complex form (Fig. 52). 
It is thus widely separated from the genital aperture, having a 
position comparable to that of Ceuthophilus when the penis of 
the latter is fully everted. 

Immediately in front of the extremity of the penis and 
partly concealed by a membranous fold a strong transverse 
arch (ar) may be seen, having a horizontal position. This bar 
curves forward on each side, passing beneath the surface and 
continuing far forward beneath the pseudosternite, with which 
it 1s connected by strong muscles. The two arms of this arch, 
from their muscular connections, appear to represent the 
endapophyses, but have lost their connections with the pseudo- 
sternite, the proximal part of the rami being absent. Con- 
nected with the arch is a pair of chitinized lobes (ra) flanking 
the penis and meeting caudad in the median line. From their 
muscular connections, as determined by Miss Norma Ford, 
who is now engaged in a comparative study of the abdominal 
muscles of Orthopterous insects, these lobes appear to represent 
the distal parts of the rami. There is also a pair of conical 
elevations arising from the penis roof, where it passes into the 
rami. These are not structures of morphological importance, 
however, as they are not of general occurrence in the Acridide. 

Continuous with the upper (morphologically posterior) 
edges of the rami are the ventral lobes (vl), two slender, sub- 
erect, valve-like processes, beset with minute spinules. They are 
straight, close together, and bound the genital aperture behind. 
They are covered in front by the dorsal lobes, (dl), a bilobed flap, 
which is an extension of the penis roof. 

The inner surface of the ventral lobes is continuous, in this 
species, with the apices of the parameres (ectoparameres, pm). 
These pass ventrad a short distance, then bend sharply dorsad 
and again ventro-cephalad, expanding into a pair of divergent, 
wing-like plates (the endoparameres, pmb), which lie beneath 
and between the endapophyses, with which they have powerful 
muscular connections. 

Lying between the endoparameres, where they most closely 
approach one another, is a small sac, formed, like the paramere 


34 Annals Entomological Society of America  [Vol. XV, 


sac of the Tettigonoidea, by the inward prolongation of the 
endoparameres, but having also a strong resemblance to the 
spermatophore sac of the Gryllide. It opens into the ejacu- 
latory duct, which is also dilated ventrally at the junction. 
The sac and ventral dilatation appear to represent a vestigial 
spermatophore sac (sps) and are here considered as such. 
The wing-hke expansions of the endoparameres have essentially 
the same relation to the spermatophore sac as in the Gryllide, 
especially in such genera as Nemobius and Oecanthus. They 
extend far beyond the end of the sac, however, the latter 
being of comparatively small size and doubtless quite 
functionless. 

The distal parts of the penis, including the rami, rest in the 
concavity of a single large lobe, which may be called the 
subventral lobe. It is separated from the floor of the genital 
cavity by a flattened space, the swbgenital sac, which extends 
far forward beneath the penis. 

The plan of structure just described for Dissosteira was 
found to be essentially the same in various species of Acridine, 
Oedipodine and Locustine and is doubtless general throughout 
the family.* 

The variations in details of form, however, particularly of 
the pseudosternite and the parts surrounding the outlet of 
the penis, are numerous and often striking, even within the 
limits of a genus, and in certain genera, such as Melanoplus, 
they would afford useful taxonomic characters if they could 
be more readily seen in dried specimens. 

The pseudosternite bears two pairs of ventral apophyses, 
to which muscles from the ninth tergum and sternum are 
attached and is elevated into a variety of prominences, cristate, 
spinous or tuberculate (ppst), according to the species. In 
Melanoplus there is a pair of anterior dorsal crests, which vary 
in size in different species, being, e. g., moderately high in M. 
bivittatus Say (Figs. 55, 56) and extremely high in M. femur- 
rubrum DeGeer. 

In this genus the ectoparameres are free (Fig. 57) and 
are enclosed by the ventral lobes, which are not valve-like as in 
Dissosteira, but broad and collar-like, surrounding the outlet 
of the penis. They are flexible, but little chitinized, and are 


* This excludes the Acrydiine, which are here considered as a distinct family, 
Acrydiide. 


1922] Walker: Structure of Orthopteroid Insects 30 


covered with minute, regularly arranged spinules. They are 
continuous with the dorsal lobes, which are black and more 
heavily chitinized, with sharp, excavated margins, apparently 
serving as titillators. In M. femur-rubrum the dorsal and 
ventral lobes are comparatively free from one another and 
the former project dorsad in the form of slender, sharp-pointed 
processes of irregular form, while in M. bivittatus (Figs. 55, 56), 
the dorsal lobes are much shorter and are folded within the 
ventral lobes in a complex, scroll-like fashion. There is a 
strongly chitinized bridge connecting the dorsal lobes with the 
arch of the endapophyses. In place of the subventral lobe 
there is only a pair of soft, irregular folds of integument. The 
expanded bases of the endoparameres are much more strongly 
divergent than in Dissosteira. 

The genitalia of the Acrydiide are astonishingly unlike 
those of the Acridide, though occupying a similar position, the 
outlet of the penis having a suberect position and the post- 
sternite lying far forward under the paraprocts. It is evident 
that the genitalia of this family have undergone a marked 
degeneration of structure. Three genera were examined: 
Tettigidea (T. lateralis parvipennis Hatr.), Acrydium (A. 
ornatum Say and A. granulatum Kirby) and Paratettix (P. 
cucullatus Burm.) 

In Tettigidea the pseudosternite is V-shaped, recalling that 
of Ceuthophilus maculatus Harr., except that, instead of the 
upright position of the latter, the arch is tilted forward so as 
to be almost horizontal. It becomes evident on seeing the 
pseudosternite in this form, that the forward tilting of this 
sclerite has taken place in all the Acridoidea and is an expression 
of the same process of shifting that has brought about the 
upright position of the genital outlet. The recurved apex of 
the pseudosternite in Tettigidea is armed with a group of 
spines. 

Behind and between the arms of the pseudosternite are two 
narrow plates, which curve inward and terminate behind in a 
pair of lobes on each side of the genital aperture. These plates 
appear to be the rami, but the endapophyses, so strongly 
developed in the Acrididez are entirely absent. The genital 
aperture is wide with folded membranous walls, and near the 
termination of the ejaculatory duct is a dilatation which rep- 
resents the spermatophore sac. There are no traces of the 


36 Annals Entomological Society of America  [Vol. XV, 


parameres. In contrast to the loss of the chitinous parts in the 
genitalia proper the pallium is strengthened by two distinct 
plates, separated by a median groove. 

In Acrydium and Paratettix the rami are absent and the 
pseudosternite is more slender with a much smaller median 
process, but the pallial structures are more complex than in 
Tettigidea, there being between the pallial plates a pair of 
slender bars, each terminating in front in an upcurved hook, 
which probably has some function in copulation. 


Phasmoidea. 


In the stick-insects and their allies the terminal abdominal 
terga of the males are all well developed and the 10th tends to 
replace the supra-anal plate, which is often vestigial or obsolete. 
In Timema californicum Scudd. (teste Crampton, 1, c., Pl. 5, 
Figs. 53, 65) the latter is distinct and only partly overlapped by 
the 10th tergum; in Diapheromera femorata Say it is a small and 
membranous lobe, while in Antsomorpha buprestoides Stoll. 
(Pl. VIII, Fig. 71), it is wholly absent. The paraprocts are well 
developed in Tzmema, of fair size in Anisomorpha, rather small 
in Diapheromera. In these genera they are little, if at all, 
chitinized, but, according to Chopard (’20), who examined a 
large number of forms, they are commonly chitinized except on 
their mesal surfaces. The cerci are short, unsegmented and 
often modified as claspers (Diapheromera). The sternal region 
of the terminal segments preserves its primitive horizontal 
position, that of the 9th and 10th being in about the same plane, 
so that the genitalia are ventral in position, as in the Der- 
maptera, not terminal as in the Orthoptera, Blattoidea, etc. 
The 9th sternum is commonly divided into two parts, a proximal 
plate, usually short, and a distal plate, which is a more or 
less free flap, or “‘hypandrium,’’ covering the genitalia. As in 
the Acridoidea and Ephemerida the proximal plate is probably 
the true sternite, the distal plate the united coxites. There 
are no true styli. In 7imema and Antsomorpha the 9th sternum 
shows its more primitive form, in that it is broadly connected 
with the tergum, both basally and laterally, but in Diapheromera 
and many other genera the sternite forms a short stalk, bearing 
the perfectly free hypandrium, which forms a cup-like receptacle 
for the genitalia. In such forms the posterior and greater part 
of the sternal area is uncovered by any part of the true sternum. 


1922] Walker: Structure of Orthopteroid Insects BY | 


On this part we find the genitalia, so that it must be considered 
as belonging properly to the intersternal membrane between 
segments 9 and 10, although it underlies the 9th tergum. 

This area in its distal part may be more or less chitinized 
(the ‘‘post-sternite’’ of Crampton) or may bear a projecting 
plate, the subanal vomer (‘‘vomer sous-anal’”’ of Pantel), (Fig. 
71, vo). Pantel considered the vomer to belong to the 10th 
sternum, but it appears to me to arise from the membrane 
just in front of this segment. 

The elongation of the 9th tergum without a corresponding 
development of the true sternum has a parallel in the Odonata, 
in which the genitalia likewise have the appearance of belonging 
to the sternum itself, rather than the intersternal membrane. 

The large size of the 10th sternum is likewise probably due 
to secondary elongation of the segment, and the primitive 
10th sternum may be almost entirely absorbed in the bases of 
the paraprocts (vide p).. Sometimes the cleft between the 
paraprocts is continued cephalad as a more or less distinct 
groove almost or quite to the base of the 10th sternal region. 

The male genitalia of the Phasmoidea form an irregular, 
asymmetrical mass, suggestive in a general way of the Blat- 
toidea, Mantoidea and Grylloblattoidea. I have studied the 
male genitalia of only two species, Diapheromera femorata Say 
and Anisomorpha buprestoides (Stoll.). 

In the former (Figs. 74, 75) the genitalia form a prominent, 
asymmetrical structure slightly divided, especially on the 
ventral face, by an oblique groove, on the left side of which the 
ejaculatory duct opens. This duct is directed slightly dextrad, 
and opens directly on the ventral surface, there being no 
invaginated pouch as in the Orthoptera, and no virga. The 
dorsal surface of the genitalia is covered by a chitinous plate 
(dpl) from which a blunt cornu (possibly the paramere) arises 
on the left side (pm?). There is no such process on the right 
side, but on the postero-ventral surface, next to the median 
groove, there is a pair of plates, which apparently form a sort 
of clasper (cl), and from which an apophysis (ap) for the 
attachment of muscles projects inwards. The presence of 
this clasper on the left side is suggestive of the Mantids, certain 
Blattids and Grylloblatta. The left lobe is ventrally thin- 
walled, a feature which is also somewhat suggestive of 
Grylloblatta. 


38 Annals Entomological Society of America  [Vol. XV, 


In Anisomorpha buprestoides (Figs. 72, 73) the genitalia 
form a shorter mass, which is sunk into a pocket formed by 
the enclosing hypandrium. There is practically no fissure 
dividing it into right and left halves, the two parts of which 
it is composed being evidently primarily dorsal and ventral 
(dpl, vpl), though actually placed so obliquely that the dorsal 
part is dorso-dextral, the ventral part ventro-sinistral. The 
greater part of the genitalia is flexible with unchitinized walls, 
but the dorsal surface is considerably chitinized and this 
sclerite plainly corresponds to the dorsal plate of Diapheromera. 
It has a prominent sinistral angle which represents the sinistral 
cornu of Diapheromera, and there is a somewhat thickened 
longitudinal part which seems to represent the primitively 
median dorsal region. The opening of the ejaculatory duct is 
well to the right, but lies in a wholly membranous area, there 
being no clasper like that of Diapheromera. 

Since the present study was made Chopard (’20) has pub- 
lished descriptions and figures of the genitalia of a number of 
Phasmids, many of which are much more complex and more 
suggestive of the Blattids than the forms described above. He 
recognizes in their typical composition four genital valves, 
of which the two superior sometimes (e. g., Antsomorpha) 
unite to form a single dorsal plate, while the two inferior valves 
may unite to form a single ventral plate. The genitalia are 
extremely variable, being in some cases wholly membranous, in 
other cases very strongly sclerified, while in still others they 
are partly membranous with many separate plates and pro- 
cesses, very suggestive of the Blattids. 

The genitalia of the Phasmoidea thus resemble those of the 
Grylloblattoidea, Mantoidea and Blattoidea (with exceptions 
in certain details) in that they appear to consist primarily of 
right and left lobes (or pairs of lobes), asymmetrical in size, 
form and position, partly membranous and partly chitinized, 
with the opening of the ejaculatory duct lying between them 
and not borne upon a conspicuous penis. In the two forms 
described here the opening of the ejaculatory duct is directed 
somewhat dextrad, as in the other groups mentioned, and in 
Diapheromera there is a dextral clasper with an internal 
apophysis, a feature also somewhat common in the Blattoidea 
and Mantoidea. ; 


1922] Walker: Structure of Orthopteroid Insects 39 


Grylloblattoidea. 


The sole member of this order is Grylloblatta campodeiformis 
Walk., the male genitalia of which have been described in 
detail by the writer (19). 

In the adult male the ninth segment, particularly the 
sternum, is large, while the tenth is small, though prominent. 
The intersternal area on which the genitalia are situated is thus 
vertical, as in the Orthoptera, Blattoidea and Mantoidea. 

Viewed from above (Fig. 62) the terminal segments appear 
symmetrical or nearly so, but from below (Fig. 63) or behind 
(Fig. 64) a pronounced degree of asymmetry is apparent. This 
asymmetry involves the ninth sternum, the tenth tergite and 
the genitalia. 

The ninth sternum is remarkable for the retention of the 
primitive division into sternite and coxites. The sternite is of 
about the same size and form as the tergite, from which it is 
separated only by a suture. It is nearly symmetrical, although 
the left side is slightly shorter than the right. The coxites, 
although of equal length, are very different in size and form. 
The left coxite is broadly triangular and strongly convex. 
Its base extends from the tergo-sternal suture to a point well 
to the left of the middle line. The right coxite is confined to 
the right side, having a much narrower base. It is also tri- 
angular, but bears a strong spur from its upper margin, directed 
meso-caudo-dorsad. Both coxites are moveably articulated 
with the sternite and bear well-developed styli upon their 
apices. 

The tenth tergum is narrowed beyond the bases of the cerci 
to a truncated apex, but does not form a freely projecting plate. 
It is continued ventrad around the bases of the cerci, terminating 
below in a pair of free, unequal arms, which nearly meet one 
another in the middle line. The left arm is the longer and is 
wholly chitinized, except at the apex, which is slightly expanded 
into a little disc or pad. The right arm is chitinized only at the 
base and is without the terminal pad. It has the appearance 
of a functionless structure. The tenth sternum is obsolete 
in the adult. 

The cerci are exactly like those of the female, being long and 
cylindrical and divided into eight distinct segments. There is 
a small, ventro-mesial, cercal basipodite. The supra-anal 


40 Annals Entomological Society of America  [Vol. XV, 


plate 1s extremely vestigial, distinctly more so than in the 
female, though prominent enough in the nymph. The para- 
procts are also rather small and membranous. 

The genitalia are bulky and very irregular. As in certain 
Phasmoidea, Blattoidea and Mantoidea there are two large 
lobes, (paramere lobes, rl, ll) separated by an oblique fissure, 
extending from about the mid-ventral line to the middle of 
the left side at the base of the tenth tergum. Both lobes project 
somewhat beyond the margins of the coxites, the exposed parts 
of their ventral surfaces being somewhat chitinized. There is 
no chitinized dorsal surface as in the Phasmids, but just below 
the paraprocts there is a narrow transverse chitinous plate, 
divided lengthwise into two parts, each of which is elevated at 
the right extremity into a rounded backward projection. This 
may represent the dorsal plate of the Phasmids, the projections 
being perhaps homologous with the right cornu or paramere, 
but it might not unreasonably be also compared with the 
pseudosternite. 

The right lobe bears upon its dorso-caudal surface a heavily 
chitinized prominence (cl), divided into two parts, which are 
irregularly folded and bear several blunt tooth-like processes. 
This prominence, together with the processes mentioned in the 
preceding paragraph, and the spur of the right coxite, with 
which they are closely associated, appear to form a clasping 
apparatus, in which the left arm of the tenth tergum may 
perhaps be included. 

The left lobe is wholly membranous, except a small ventral 
chitinized area, but it is produced into a long, thin-walled, 
tubular sac, which is doubtless normally invaginated, when not 
in use. 

The presence of the chitinous prominence on the right side, 
but not on the left, is suggestive of the Phasmid, Diapheromera 
(q. v.), and the eversible sac of the left lobe much resembles 
that of many Blattids, such as Blattella and Parcoblatta, except 
that in the latter the sac forms a sheath for a protrusible hook, 
while in Grylloblatta no such hook is present, and it is therefore 
difficult to conjecture as to what its function may be. 

The opening of the ejaculatory duct could not be found in 
the single adult male of Grylloblatta available for study. It 
will almost certainly be found in the fissure between the two 
lobes. The mesoventral angle of the left lobe is produced into 


1922] Walker: Structure of Orthopteroid Insects Al 


a process, which lies in a fold of the right lobe. This process is 
slightly grooved mesially, the groove being continued along the 
interlobar fissure. Possiblv this is a seminal groove, the process 
bearing it being a sort of rudimentary aedeagus, similar to many 
blattids, such as Periplaneta. In this genus, and in other Blat- 
tids, Mantids and Phasmids, the ejaculatory duct is more 
closely associated with the left lobe than the right. 

Nympeu. In the immature male of Grylloblatia the coxites 
are more nearly alike in size and form, although the asymmetry 
is evident in the specimens studied. These evidently belong to 
two successive instars, the later of which appears to belong to 
about the penultimate stage. 

In the younger nymph (Fig. 66) the tenth segment is rel- 
atively large, its sternal surface being nearly in the same plane 
with that of the ninth. The supra-anal plate and paraprocts are 
much larger and more prominent than in the adult. The left 
coxite is distinctly larger than the right and the latter shows 
no trace of the spur present in the adult. The tenth tergum is 
symmetrical and without free prolongations of the ventrolateral 
margins. Between these margins is a distinct, though small and 
membranous, tenth sternal area. In the intersternal mem- 
brane are two oval, slightly elevated areas, which are the 
rudiments of the two genital lobes. 

In the older nymph (Figs. 67, 68) the tenth segment is 
relatively somewhat smaller and the tenth sternal area almost 
obliterated by the closer approximation of the ventro-lateral 
margins of the tergum. The supra-anal plate and paraprocts 
have decreased in size. The genital area is no longer horizontal 
but subvertical in position, and the genital lobes are much 
larger and separated by an oblique fissure, as in the adult, but 
there are as yet no chitinous processes nor eversible sac. The 
ninth sternum, coxites and styli have not changed appreciably, 
though there is a slight increase in their asymmetry. 


Blattoidea. 


In the male cockroach the abdominal! terga, cerci and cercal 
basipodites are essentially like those of the female. The eighth 
and ninth terga are abbreviated, while the tenth replaces the 
aborted supra-anal plate and is often considerably prolonged 
caudad. It is however, narrowed on the sides, terminating 
beneath the bases of the cerci. The ninth sternum forms a large 


42 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


hypandrium, much like that of many ‘Tettigonoidea, and 
usually bears styli upon its hind margin. It is a coxosternum, 
sternite and coxites being completely fused. It is often very 
asymmetrical, sometimes bearing a lobe or process on one side 
but not on the other, and the styli are often unequally devel- 
oped and asymetrically placed. The paraprocts are broad and 
depressed and are usually chitinized beneath, at least in part; 
the chitinized portions meeting the margin of the tenth tergum 
and thus appearing to represent the tenth sternum, with which 
they have been identified by Chopard ('17).* They are fre- 
quently strongly asymmetrical and may bear a hook on one 
or both sides. The upper surface and sometimes a pair of mesial 
lobes are membranous. 


The genitalia are strongly asymmetrical and show a wide 
range of variation. They consist, essentially, of an edeagus or 
penis, upon which the ejaculatory duct opens, sometimes at 
the base, sometimes upon a retractile spine (virga); and two 
outgrowths or processes, primitively dorso-lateral to the penis, 
each of which bears one or more chitinous parts. These are 
usually very differently developed on the right and left sides, 
and their relative positions seem to be primarily similar to that 
of the two lobes in Grylloblatta, 7. e., they are obliquely shifted, 
so that the right process overlaps the left. In what appears 
to be the most primitive form met with in the types studied 
(dextral process of Blattella), their structure consists of a freely 
projecting shaft, whose base has been deeply sunk into the 
hemocoele, to serve as an apophysis for the attachment of 
protractor and retractor muscles, while from the folds sur- 
rounding the pocket thus formed secondary chitinizations for 
the attachment of muscles may also develop. Such a form of 
process is protrusible and retractile to a certain extent, but 
apparently cannot be completely ensheathed. In the left 
process of Blattella, however, we have a modification of this 
form, in which the shaft has the form of a hook and can be 
completely withdrawn into a deep membranous pocket or sheath 
whose walls are without secondary chitinizations, and which is 
not prolonged into an apophysis, the muscles being attached 
directly to its base. 


* See p. 7. 


1922] Walker: Structure of Orthopteroid Insects 43 


The opposite extreme is seen in Blatta or Pertplaneta, in 
which there are two lobes, separated by an oblique fissure, 
each bearing several chitinous plates, prolonged into a variety 
of peculiarly shaped processes, none of which are capable of 
being invaginated. In such cases it is exceedingly difficult 
to determine which of these processes are homologous with 
those of Blattelia, or even the homologies of the right and left 
lobes of the same species; but the complex folding of the lobes 
suggests that the various plates and processes have arisen 
secondarily as chitinizations of the folds surrounding the sheath 
of the primary process. As these two processes arise primitively 
dorso-lateral to the aedeagus, as can be seen in the nymph, it 
seems reasonable to consider them tentatively as the parameres 
of which some representative would be expected to occur in so 
generalized a group as the Blattoidea. . 

The following species were studied in detail: Blattella 
germanica L, Parcoblatla pensylvanica DeGeer, Blaberus atropos 
Serv., Pertplaneta brunnea Burm., P. fuliginosa Brunn. and 
P. americana (L.). 

Blattella germanica L. (Pl. IX, Figs. 80-83). In this species 
the tenth tergum is produced into a large flexible flap, the ninth 
sternum is very asymmetrical and the styli are unequal in size, 
close together and both to the left of the middle line. The 
paraprocts are asymmetrical and divided into two parts, a 
small membranous, pubescent lobe, next to the anus, and below 
this a transverse chitinous strip, which meets the edge of the 
tenth tergite and bears a prominent hook. The dextral hook 
curves upward and is simple, the sinistral hook curves down- 
ward and is bifid. The penis is large and somewhat conical 
and the ejaculatory duct opens upon a long, straight, retractile 
spine or virga. 

The dextral paramere consists of the following structures: 
An irregular pocket with folded walls, which is produced 
internally into a long slender apophysis, whose outer extremity 
is bifurcated. Articulating with its outer branch and forming 
a prolongation of the ectodorsal edge of the pocket is a pro- 
jecting blade or shaft, and connected with the inner branch 
is a chitinous strip, forming the ventro-mesial edge of the 
pocket. A rounded lobe with a chitinous margin is folded into 
the pocket on its inner side and serves for the origin of pro- 
tractor muscles, which are inserted into the inner side of the 


44 Annals Entomological Society of America  [Vol. XV, 


apophysis. The projecting blade appears to be the primary 
part of the paramere, whose base has been invaginated for the 
insertion of muscles, while the folded edges of the invagination 
have become chitinized for muscular attachment. 

The sinistral paramere* is a large hook, which, when not in 
use, is completely retracted into a membranous sheath. Muscles. 
are inserted directly into the inner end of the hook. When 
protruded this is a very conspicuous structure, extending 
beyond the edge of the ninth sternum. 

Parcoblaita pensylvanica DeGeer (Figs. 84-88). The geni- 
talia of this species are essentially smiliar to those of Blattelia 
germanica. The ninth sternum is but slightly asymmetrical, 
but the paraprocts are strongly so. Each is divided into an 
outer hook and an inner lobe. The dextral hook is a large, 
heavily chitinized structure, whose base meets the edge of the 
tenth tergite. The sinistrai hook is much feebler and is 
scarcely chitinized. The relative sizes of the lobes is reversed, 
the sinistral being much the larger. The penis is similar to 
that of Blatteila, the ejaculatory duct very slender and opening 
near the apex of the slender, slightly curved virga. 

The sinistral paramere resembles that of Blattella except in 
the lack of a prominent shaft, which is reduced to a mere 
angular flap, overhanging the opening of the pocket. The 
sinistral paramere is a retractile hook, like that of Blattella, but 
much shorter and stouter. When retracted the curved end 
of the hook is generally slightly exposed, as in Fig. 84. 

Blaberus atropos Serv. In this large roach the ninth sternum 
is somewhat asymmetrical, the styli of similar size and widely 
separated. The paraprocts are less sharply divided into 
outer chitinized and inner flexible parts, and only the dextral 
hook is present, this being short, blunt and strongly curved. 
The penis is very different from that of the two preceding types, 
being a large, fleshy outgrowth, deeply channeled above and 
bearing numerous spinules on the inner surface of the channel 
near its extremity. Lying in the channel is an irregularly 
_chitinized process, probably a modification of the virga, but 
the ejaculatory duct does not open upon it, but at the base of 
the aedeagus and is a much wider passage than in Blattella and 
Parcoblatta. The dextral paramere is much like the sinistral 


a 3 = (20) identifies this process incorrectly with the penis (p. 98, 
ig. 15). } 


1922] Walker: Structure of Orthopteroid Insects 45 


one of these genera, consisting of an eversible hook, whose 
sheath forms an irregular membranous prominence which is 
continued sinistrad with a long membranous fold under the 
paraprocts to the corresponding dextral prominence. The 
latter is much smaller and bears an irregularly folded structure 
with chitinous edges, which in general appearance is suggestive 
of the dextral paramere of Parcoblatta, but which is probably 
more nearly comparable to the sinistral structure of Periplaneta 
in a very aborted condition. 

In this species is seen something of the tendency met with 
in Blatta, Periplaneta, the Mantide and Grvylloblatta of the 
dextral paramere (or paramere-bearing outgrowth) to overlap 
the sinistral one. 

PERIPLANETA. In this genus the paraprocts are symmetrical 
but the genitalia are strongly asymmetrical and exceedingly 
complicated. The paraprocts are dorsally but little chitinized, 
but are covered ventraily by large plates, which are separated 
only by the anal fissure, and simulate closely a divided sternum. 
They are without the. hooks met with in the other forms 
described. 

The paramere lobes are both large and prominent, par- 
ticularly the sinistral, and are separated by a very oblique 
fissure, from which a large fleshy lobe representing the penis 
(the ‘‘lame mediane”’ of Peytoureau, '95)* emerges below and 
is directed obliquely dextrad. The wide ejaculatory duct 
opens upon its membranous dorsal surface, near the apex. 
The ventral surface is somewhat chitinized. 

The three species of Periplaneta examined differ greatly in 
the details of the genitalia, but agree in general structure. 

The dextral paramere is fundamentally similar to that of 
Blattella, but is much more complex and its parts more heavily 
chitinized. In P. fuliginosa Serv. the basal apophysis is short 
and broad, and concave on its inner face. The shaft is an 
irregular, curved sclerite, divided into proximal and distal parts, 
the former strongly folded and articulating with the apophysis 
with which it is connected by muscles. The distal part is 
bifurcate, the upper branch short and terminating in several 
irregular teeth, the lower long and slender and tapering to a 
point. The chitinized inner fold of Blattella and Parcoblatta is 


* The process termed the penis by Peytoureau is a part of the sinistral lobe. 
Peytoureau, however, observed correctly the position of the genital aperture. 


46 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


developed into a large bivalved prominence (Pl. X, Figs. 91-93), 
which perhaps serves as a clasper* (cf. Stagmomantis). Strong 
muscles connect the upper valve with the apophysis, as in 
Blattella, though their action is probably quite different, 
appearing in the case of P. fuliginosa to elevate the valve. 

In Pertplaneta brunnea Burm. the two processes representing 
the distal part of the shaft are modified into a pair of hooks, as 
shown in Fig. 96, and the clasper is also of different form. 
In P. americana L. the upper of the processes (the short one in 
P. fuliginosa) is the well-known “‘bird’s head”’ process, termed 
by Crampton “‘fimbrilobus.”’ It is a broad, flat structure, 
clearly belonging to the dorsal surface of .the paramere lobe, 
and has the form shown in Fig. 99. The other process, so 
strongly developed in P. fuliginosa and P. brunnea, is reduced 
to an insignificant hook. The parts representing the clasper 
are of simpler structure and more easily recognized as the 
chitinized walls of the pocket from which the apophysis is 
formed. 

The sinistral paramere lobe (Figs. 94,.95) is apparently not 
comparable in detail with the dextral. In P. fuliginosa it is 
divided into three principal processes, a dorsal, a ventro- 
lateral and a ventro-mesial. As seen from the left side (Fig. 95) 
the dorsal and ventro-lateral processes appear separated by 
a deep distal cleft. The dorsal process is chitinized along the 
side, terminating in a sharp point, but is membranous above and 
on the oblique inner surface. The ventro-lateral process is 
well chitinized and is the long, slender titillator (pm) which 
curves dextrad and dorsad, tapering to a pointed apex. The 
ventro-mesial part is free from the dorsal process only distally, 
where it terminates in a rounded lobe and a slender spur or 
hook. The dorso-mesial surface also bears two smaller, sharp- 
pointed processes and above these two membranous lobes. 

In Pertplaneta brunnea Burm. the same parts are recognizable 
but differ more or less in form, particularly the ventro-mesial 
process, which terminates in a long, straight spine, and the 
dorso-mesial sclerites, which, instead of bearing straight spines, 
are low tubercles covered with minute spinules. 

In P. americana L. the ventro-lateral process is stouter and 
tipped with a hook, the ventro-mesial process is somewhat 


* The ‘‘tuberculum”’ of Berlese. 


1922] Walker: Structure of Orthopteroid Insects A7 


similar and also resembles that of P. fuliginosa. The part 
which represents the dorsal process is bent up sharply distad 
and terminates in a large chitinous knob. The dorso-mesial 
surface is marked by two longitudinal furrows and bears another 
large chitinous tubercle. 

Although it is impossible to determine with certainty from 
the few types studied which of the various processes borne by 
the sinistral lobe in Periplaneta is the homologue of the eversible 
hook of Blattella and Parcoblatta, 1t appears probable that it is 
the long ventro-lateral process, this being the longest, most 
independent, and apparently the most constantly present of 
these parts. It is also lodged within a furrow formed by the , 
other two parts, which may therefore be possibly looked upon ~ 
as secondary outgrowths from the paramere sheath. 

By reason of the resemblance of the sinistral lobe of Pert- 
planeta to that of the Mantids, and the non-retractile character 
of all its processes, it is probably a more primitive type than 
that of Blattella and Parcoblatta, in spite of its complexity of 
structure. The symmetrical paraprocts and hypandrium, and 
possibly the more elongate joints of the cerci may also be marks 
of primitive organization. 


Mantoidea. 


The male Mantids are very similar to the Blattids with 
respect to their genitalia and other abdominal structures. 

Only three species were studied: Stagmomantis carolina L., 
S. floridensis Davis and Mantis religiosa L.; and these are all 
essentially similar in the parts with which we are concerned, 
so that, unless stated otherwise, the following remarks will 
apply in particular to one species, S. carolina. 

The terga, cerci and anal valves are similar to those of the 
female, the tenth tergum, as in the Blattids, replacing the supra- 
anal plate, which, however, remains as a membranous vestige. 
In some newly hatched Mantids of an unknown species from 
Japan it is quite distinct and only partly overlapped by the 
tenth tergite (Pl. XI, Fig. 109), a fact which has been pointed 
out recently by Chopard (’17). 

The ninth sternum is a somewhat elongate plate, sym- 
metrical and bearing large styli upon its hind margin. This 
margin is but little excavated in the adults of any of the species 
seen, but in the young nymphs referred to in the preceding 


48 Annals Entomological Society of America  [Vol. XV, 


paragraph a deep V-shaped notch separates the two coxites, 
though these are at all stages fused with the sternite. In 
all these respects the Mantid nymphs resemble those of the 
Tettigonoidea. 

The genitalia (Pl. XI, Figs. 105-107) are strongly asym- 
metrical and consist of two paramere lobes, whose relative 
positions are similar to those of Periplaneta. 

The dextral lobe is very much smaller than the sinistral, 
which it overlaps slightly, being little developed except dorsally. 
It may be compared in some measure with that of such Blattids 
as Blatella and Parcoblatta. A slender basal ventral piece 
(pmb) evidently represents the basal apophysis of the Blattids, 
although not actually internal; and as in Blattella and Parco- 
blatta, though less distinctly so, it is bifurcated at base, the 
lower branch curving sharply around and terminating in the 
small, heavily chitinized: ventral prominence, while the other 
branch ends in a similar process just above it. These two 
structures serve as a clasper in copulation, as I have ascertained 
in the case of a female specimen, whose genitalia are still con- 
nected with those of a male, although all but the end of the 
abdomen of the latter is missing, having doubtless been eaten 
by the female, as is the habit of many Mantids. The clasper 
is possibly homologous with that which appears as such in some 
Blattids, such as Periplaneta. 

The upper jaw of the clasper is continuous above with the 
large, dorsal, shelf-like flap (df) which is readily compared with 
the dorsal plate (base of shaft) in the dextral paramere of 
Blattide (cf. Pertplaneta fuliginosa, Fig. 100). 

The sinistral paramere lobe bears a distinct resemblance 
to that of Periplaneta, especially as seen from the left side 
(cf. Figs. 95, 108), in which position parts representing the 
dorsal and ventro-lateral processes of Pertplaneta are seen, 
though in the case of the Mantid the latter would be more 
appropriately termed the ventral process, as its broad chitinized 
base forms the entire ventral surface of the lobe and extends 
far over upon the right side, where it meets the narrow ventral 
portion (apophysis) of the dextral lobe. The process itself is 
bent dorsad in Stagmomantis, but in Mantts religiosa, in which 
it is much longer and more slender, it is directed dextrad. 
The dorsal process curves strongly to the left and in S. carolina 
is bifurcate. It appears to arise from beneath the dorsal plate, 


1922] Walker: Structure of Orthopteroid Insects 49 


but it is closely connected with the latter and in other species 
seems to form a part of it. 

This dorsal plate bears some resemblance to that of the 
right side and is probably its homologue, though not a free 
flap as in the latter case. 

The inner surface of the lobe is for the most part mem- 
branous, but there are two small, though heavily chitinized, 
plates, which lie close to the mouth of the eyaculatory duct. In 
S. floridensis one of these is prolonged into a flagellum, while in 
Mantis religiosa they are both short and spinulose. These 
parts appear to represent the small sclerite which occupy a 
similar position in Periplaneta. There is no evident represen- 
tative of the ventro-mesial process, unless it be one of these. 
The ejaculatory duct is a large tube passing between the two 
lobes, which are virtually wrapped around it. It opens upon 
the inner, membranous surface of the sinistral lobe, imme- 
diately beneath the two small, dark, inner sclerites. There is 
only the feeblest indication of an aedeagus. 


Isoptera. 


The same two species of ‘‘termites’’ were studied as in the 
case of the females, viz., Termopsis angusticollis Hagen and 
Leucotermes flavipes Kollar. The results of this study supple- 
ment those obtained from the females in showing that the 
Isoptera are most nearly related to the Blattoidea and Man- 
toidea, and form with these groups a distinctly natural 
assemblage. 

The general appearance of the end of the male abdomen in 
Termopsis angusticollis (Figs. 76, 77), is similar to that of the 
female, but, as in the Blattids and Mantids, differs in the 
presence of styli. The character of the segmentation agrees 
closely with these groups. The last three tergites are, like those 
of the female, curved slightly ventro-caudad, all being much 
shortened laterally. The tenth is considerably enlarged and 
takes the place of the supra-anal plate, which is not present as 
a distinct structure. Close to the ventro-caudal margins of the 
tergites are the spiracles. The cerci are similar to those of the 
female. 

The sternal region is quite blattoid in structure. The 
sternum of the ninth segment forms a large, undivided, sub- 
genital plate, bearing a symmetrical pair of styli on the caudal 


50 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


margin. The genital cavity is much smaller than in the Blat- 
tide and contains no chitinized parts. In neither of the forms 
could I find a penis of any sort, merely a median genital aper- 
ture with membranous walls. The absence of external genitalia 
is without doubt a secondary condition. The points of resem- 
blance to the Blattids and Mantids are so numerous as to 
leave no doubt that the Isoptera are closely related to them, 
and this belief carries with it the assumption that external 
genitalia were present in the common ancestor of these groups. 
The genitalia of this ancestral form were probably asymmet- 
rical, since they are of this type in Grylloblatta, a form that is 
somewhat more primitive than the members of the other 
three groups. 


Zoraptera. 


An interesting paper by Crampton on the external anatomy 
of Zorotypus hubbardi Caudell has recently appeared (Cramp- 
ton, ’20), in which some details of the terminal segments of 
both sexes are given. The general appearance of these segments 
recalls the Isoptera, to which order Crampton regards the 
Zoraptera as nearly related, and it is stated by this writer that 
‘“‘the terminal segments in general and of the winged females 
in particular are quite Isopteroid.’’ He does not specify in 
what respects they are Isopteroid, and a study of his figures 
does not confirm the statement. The ninth tergum in both 
sexes is much reduced and bears a horn-like projection in the 
male; the tenth appears to form with the supra-anal plate and 
paraprocts a continuous sclerite. The.cerci are short and 
unsegmented. : 

More important than these, however, are the sternal char- 
acteristics. The ninth sternum of the male, so conspicuous in 
the Isoptera, is seemingly absent or represented only by a 
membranous lobe, while the eighth, according to Crampton’s 
figure, takes the place of it as a subgenital plate. In the 
female the eighth sternum is well developed, not reduced and 
concealed by the seventh as in the Isoptera, Blattids and 
Mantids, while there is an additional sclerite below the anus, 
not represented in these groups. 

The male genitalia (Figs. 78-79) resemble those of the 
Mantids, as pointed out by Crampton. The sinistral process 
appears to be the same as that which I have considered to be 


1922] Walker: Structure of Orthopteroid Insects 51 


probably the sinistral paramere in the Blattid Periplaneta, or 
the Mantid Stagmomantis, but the large dextral lobe is not cer- 
tainly its fellow of the opposite side, but may belong to the 
same lobe, since in the Mantids the sinistral lobe is greatly 
developed and bears two processes or more, while the dextral 
is greatly reduced. It may, therefore, be possible that both 
hooks shown in the figure belong to the left side and that the 
dextral lobe does not show or may be absent. 


Odonata. 


In the dragonflies the general elongation of the abdominal 
segments includes the terminal ones, although the tenth is 
small as compared with the others, except the first. 

The ninth sternum covers much less than the entire sternal 
region of the ninth segment, there being a considerable area 
posterior to the genitalia, which is morphologically part of 
the membrane between the ninth and tenth sterna, though it 
may be more or less chitinized and appears to be part of the 
sternum itself. The genitalia thus appear to be situated upon 
the ninth sternum rather than upon the succeeding intersternal 
area. In other words the ninth sternum has not kept pace with 
the elongation of the tergum and the genitalia thus appear to be 
shifted cephalad. : 


The ninth sternum is not modified as a subgenital plate, but 
there are two small, flat plates on each side of the genital 
aperture and partly overlapping it. In the nymphs of the sub- 
order Zygoptera and in those of certain Anisoptera such as the 
Aeshninz these plates are readily seen to be homologous with 
the lateral gonapophyses (dorsal valves) of the female, as 
pointed out by Van der Weele (’06), and are therefore coxites. 
In the young nymphs of some Zygoptera vestigial styli are 
borne at their apices, though these disappear later. 

In the ninth sternum is thus preserved the primitive 
division into sternite and coxites. 

The genital aperture is surrounded by a chitinous ring and 
may be slightly elevated upon a small papilla, but there is no 
functional penis morphologically comparable to that of other 
insects, the copulatory organs being situated upon the sterna 
of the second and third segments and having no homology with 
the genitalia of other orders. The problem of the origin of these 


52 Annals Entomological Society of America |Vol. XV, 


accessory genitalia is an exceedingly difficult one but is outside 
the scope of the present paper. Their structure has been ably 
dealt with by Schmidt (15). 

The 10th segment has a remarkably well developed sternum, 
which, however, often shows a tendency to fuse with the 
tergum, although its boundaries may be clearly defined. 

Behind the 10th segment are two paired processes and an 
unpaired one, which upon anatomical grounds alone would be 
unhesitatingly interpreted as the cerci, paraprocts and supra- 
anal plate. In the Anisoptera what appear to be the cerci 
and supra-anal plate are the structures termed by systematists 
the superior and inferior appendages, these structures serving 
as claspers in copulation. In the Zygoptera the homologue of 
the inferior appendage is rudimentary in the adult, but bears 
the median caudal gill in the nymph, while the structures called 
the inferior appendages in the adults and which bear the lateral 
caudal gills in the nymph are apparently the paraprocts. 
In the adults of Anisoptera they are inconspicuous and do not 
function as claspers as they do in the Zygoptera. 

This interpretation of these parts, which seems obvious to 
the comparative anatomist, is denied by Heymons and others 
on embryological grounds, the apparent -paraprocts being 
interpreted as the true cerci, while the apparent cerci are 
regarded as secondary structures, termed “‘cercoids.”’ Three 
small papillae, a dorsal and two ventral, which surround the 
anus in the nymphs of some dragonflies, are considered to be 
the true supra-anal plate (telson) and subanal plates (para- 
procts); the apparent supra-anal plate being the 11th tergite. 
I believe that further investigations will show that the former, 
more obvious interpretation is the correct one. It has full 
support from the standpoint of comparative myology, as 
determined by Miss Norma Ford, whose results, however, 
are not yet published. Moreover, if we adopt Heymons’ 
view we are forced the improbable conclusion that the 11th 
segment is an embryonic structure in all insects except the 
Odonata, while in this order it is highly developed and 
morphologically exactly replaces the 12th segment of other 
insects. 


OO 


1922] Walker: Structure of Orthopteroid Insects 5 


SUMMARY OF THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE ORDERS. 


BASED ON THE TERMINAL ABDOMINAL STRUCTURES 
OF THE MALES. 


EPHEMERIDA. Terminal segments (9-10) well developed; 
ninth sternum consisting of sternite and coxites, which may 
be separate or united, and bear long jointed styli; supra-anal 
plate feebly developed, but a telofilum present, generally long 
and multi-articulate like the cerci; paraprocts but little 
developed and largely or wholly membranous; genitalia con- 
sisting of double symmetrical penes, with or without parameres; 
virga absent in the forms studied; post-sternum present or 
absent. 

DERMAPTERA. Terminal segments all distinct, none reduced; 
the tenth tergum greatly enlarged; ninth sternum forming a 
large, undivided hypandrium without styli; cerci very large, 
forcipate, unsegmented (except in immature stages of some 
genera); supra-anal plate divided into two or three segments, 
the second and third perhaps representing a vestigial telofilum; 
paraprocts in the form of thin, flat, free plates, occupying the 
sternal region of segment 10, there being no true tenth sternum 
in the types studied; penis elongate, bifid or double, with 
paired apertures, or single with one aperture; a virga or virge 
present; also a pair of parameres, usually lateral or dorso- 
lateral arising from the walls of the penis. 

EMBIIDINA. ‘Terminal segments distinct, the ninth tergum 
shortened, the tenth large, somewhat asymmetrical and divided 
more or less completely into hemitergites bearing dissimilar 
copulatory processes; ninth sternum forming an asymmetrically 
triangular hypandrium, terminating in a copulatory process, 
without separate coxites or styli; cerci two-jointed, slightly 
asymmetrical, with rather large basipodites, of which the left 
may bear a copulatory process; the various copulatory processes 
converging toward the left side; supra-anal plate and para- 
procts undeveloped (or vestigial); penis absent. 

In the primitive genus Clothoda the parts are symmetrical, 
the tenth tergum undivided, the basipodites very large and 
projecting inward and the copulatory processes all absent. 

PLECOPTERA. Terminal segments well developed, but not 
elongated, the ninth and tenth often more or less annular; 


54 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


ninth sternum undivided and without styli, usually but little 
modified as a hypandrium; cerci typically elongate and multi- 
articulate; supra-anal plate extremely variable, sometimes 
simple and indistinctly separated from the tenth tergite, 
sometimes modified to form complex copulatory organs, which - 
may be freely projecting and bent forwards to occupy a groove 
on the dorsum of the terminal segments, or concealed in a 
pocket which divides mesially the 10th tergum; paraprocts 
usually large and often fused with bases of cerci, frequently 
bearing copulatory hooks; penis, when present single (rarely 
bifid?), eversible, with or without a virga; sometimes with 
parameres. 

ORTHOPTERA. ‘Terminal segments more or less shortened; 
ninth sternum enlarged to form a hypandrium, sometimes 
divided by a transverse suture, with or without styli; cerci 
moderate or short, unsegmented (with rare exceptions, v. 
Tridactylus), often modified as claspers; with a small basipodite; 
supra-anal plate generally weli developed, sometimes divided 
into a. separate 11th tergite and telson (Acrididz), not concealed 
by the tenth tergum; paraprocts variable, rarely (Tridactylide) 
bearing cercus-like processes; penis generally large, the ejacu- 
latory duct emptying through a spermatophore sac, into which 
(typically) the bases of the parameres are retracted; a pseudo- 
sternite typically present, forming a collar over dorsum of penis 
and prolonged ventrad into a pair of rami, from which arise 
inward projections or apophyses for muscular attachment. 
Numerous modifications of this plan occur. 

PHASMOIDEA. Terminal segments elongated, the genitalia 
being ventral instead of posterior in position; ninth sternum 
transversely divided, a small sternite being separated from a 
large, more or less-flap-like hypandrium (united coxites), 
without styli; cerci short, generally modified as claspers; supra- 
anal plate usually vestigial or absent, paraprocts moderate or 
prominent; penis apparently situated on the ninth sternal 
region, in reality on the elongated and secondarily chitinized 
interval between the ninth and tenth sterna, stout, asym- 
metrical, more or less distinctly divided into right and left 
lobes, the right overlapping the left, the ventrally placed 
genital aperture thus directed somewhat dextrad; dorsal surface 
somewhat chitinized and bearing in some forms a pair of 
cornua (parameres?). 


Or 


1922] Walker: Structure of Orthopteroid Insects 5 


GRYLLOBLATTOIDEA. Terminal segments not elongated, 
the tenth small but prominent; its lateral lobes prolonged 
ventro-mesad into a pair of asymmetrical copulatory arms; 
ninth sternum very large and asymmetrically divided into 
sternite and coxites bearing styli, the coxites probably serving 
as claspers; cerci segmented as in the female, with small basi- 
podite; penis large, divided into two asymmetrical lobes, the 
right overlapping the left, the genital aperture probably in 
the intervening fissure; dextral lobe bearing an irregular, 
chitinous process; sinistral lobe with no chitinous process, but 
with an eversible membranous sac; a pair of plates bearing 
dextral copulatory processes near the dextral coxite, which 
bears an additional process; the processes together forming a 
clasping apparatus on the right side. 


BLATTOIDEA. Terminal segments slightly abbreviated, but 
the tenth tergum prolonged into a flap which serves as a supra- 
anal plate; ninth sternum forming a large, undivided, but 
styligerous hypandrium; cerci of moderate length, flattened, 
multi-articulate; supra-anal plate disappearing in early nymphal 
life; paraprocts flattened, generally more or less chitinized 
beneath and often bearing asymmetrical copulatory hooks, or 
a single dextral hook; penis asymmetrical, consisting of a median 
lobe or process, directed more or less dextrad, bearing the 
genital opening, which is sometimes situated on a retractile 
virga, and two dissimilar lateral lobes, of which the dextral 
tends to overlap the sinistral, these lobes bearing the para- 
meres (?) and frequently other accessory chitinous processes. 
One of the parameres may be modified into a retractile copu- 
latory hook; the dextral lobe may bear a clasper. 


MANTOIDEA. Terminal segments but little abbreviated, 
the tenth tergum forming a flap which serves as a supra-anal 
_plate; ninth sternum forming a very large, but undivided 
hypandrium, bearing styli; cerci of moderate length, less 
flattened than in the Blattoidea, multi-articulate; supra-anal 
plate vestigial and membranous; paraprocts broad, somewhat 
flattened, unchitinized in the types studied; penis strongly 
asymmetrical, consisting of two dissimilar paramere lobes, the 
sinistral very large, the dextral small and overlapping the 
sinistral; ejaculatory duct wide, opening on the mesial surface 
of the sinistral lobe, with which the vestigial penis-lobe is 


56 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


fused. Sinistral lobe with a dorsal plate and two copulatory 
processes or titillators, of which the ventral represents the 
paramere (?), and one or two accessory processes; dextral lobe 
with a dorsal plate and a small ventral clasper. 


ISOPTERA. Terminal segments scarcely abbreviated; the 
tenth tergum prolonged, serving as a supra-anal plate; ninth 
sternum forming a large undivided hypandrium, bearing styl; 
cerci short, of two to several segments; true supra-anal plate 
absent as a distinct structure; paraprocts broad and somewhat 
flattened, but little chitinized; penis absent or reduced to a small 
membranous lobe, the genital aperture single and median; no 
copulatory processes present. 


ZORAPTERA. Ninth tergum abbreviated; tenth fused with 
supra-anal plate and paraprocts; cerci short and unsegmented; 
ninth sternum absent or membranous, the eighth apparently 
taking its place as a hypandrium; penis consisting chiefly of 
two asymmetrical processes, the sinistral a slender titillator, 
the dextral a large lobe bearing a subapical dorsal hook; position 
of genital aperture unknown. 


ODONATA. Terminal segments elongated, the genitalia 
ventral in position; ninth sternum consisting of sternite and two 
separate, rudimentary coxites, without styli; the membrane 
between the ninth and tenth sterna somewhat chitinized so as 
to appear to belong to the ninth sternum; tenth sternum 
distinct; true or primitive penis very small and simple, without 
parameres (replaced by secondary penis on sternum of segment 
2); cerci short and unsegmented; supra-anal plate elongate 
and projecting (Anisoptera) or small and inconspicuous, 
(Zygoptera); paraprocts rather large, without appendages 
(Anisoptera), or with copulatory processes (Zygoptera). In 
nymphs of many genera indications of a possible twelfth segment 
are present. 


Fic. 6. 


Fig. 6. Diagrams of male genitalia of Orthopteroid types of insects. a, Ephe- 
merida, based on Callibaetis; b, Dermaptera, based on Anisolabis; c, Dermap- 
tera, based on Forficula; d, Orthoptera, generalized type, based mainly on 
Ceuthophilus; e, Phasmoidea, Diapheromera; f, Grylloblattoidea, Gryllo- 
blatta; g, Blattoidea, based on Periplaneta; h, Mantoidea, based on 
Stagmomantis. For lettering, see page 71. 


58 Annals Entomological Socieyt of America [Vol. XV, 


CONCLUDING REMARKS ON THE PHYLOGENY OF 
ORTHOPTEROID INSECTS. 


In any attempt to unravel the relationships of a group of 
organisms it is obvious that the entire structure of the body 
should be taken into account. It would be beyond the scope 
of this paper, however, to do this for the Orthopteroid orders 
of insects, but 1t may be useful to examine the results of our 
studies of the terminal abdominal structures from this point 
of view, taking into consideration, at the same time, results 
obtained and opinions held by other workers on various regions 
of the body. 


Few will deny, I think, that the Pterygota are descendants 
of either a single species of winged ancestor, or a group of nearly 
related forms in which the wings were evolved under similar 
conditions from homologous parts. The evolution of wings 
is a unique and anomalous development in the Arthropoda, 
and their invariable presence on the same two body segments 
with the same fundamental structure and plan of venation 
makes it exceedingly improbable that they have arisen inde- 
pendently in more than one group of nearly allied forms. 
Accepting this view, we must assume that there was a single 
species of common ancestor of winged insects possessing either 
wings or the appendages from which wings were evolved. 


It is also generally agreed upon that the Thysanura is a 
primitively wingless group, as their general structure reveals 
a number of features that are more primitive than those of 
existing Pterygote insects. 


If these premises are correct it follows that where structures 
or characters are found in both Thysanura and Pterygota, 
that are undoubtedly homologous, these structures or char- 
acters were present in the common ancestral Pterygote form, as 
also in the common ancestor of the Thysanura and Pterygota. 


Thus, from what has been learned regarding the terminal 
segments and genitalia of the Orthopteroid insects, we should 
expect to find in the common Pterygote ancestor the following 
characters: 


1922| Walker: Structure of Orthopteroid Insects 59 


In both sexes: 

(1). 10th sternum small, simple, distinct from paraprocts, 
without styl1. 

(2). A distinct supra-anal plate, bearing a segmented 
cerciform appendage. 

(3). Well developed paraprocts, without additional append- 
ages. 

(4). Multi-articulate cerct. 


In the male: 
(5). Ninth sternum divided into sternite and styligerous 
coxites. 
(6). Genitalia arising from the membrane between the 
sterna of segments 9 and 10, including a pair of 
parameres. 


In the female: 

(7). Eighth sternum with a median pair of appendages, the 
anterior gonapophyses. 

(8). Ninth sternum represented mainly by the two elongate 
styligerous coxites, the lateral gonapophyses, and a 
median pair of appendages, the posterior gon- 
apophyses. 

(9). Genital apertures in the membrane between the sterna 
of segments 8 and 9. 


There were probably two male genital apertures, each on a 
separate penis, as in the Ephemerida. The single penis of the 
Thysanura has probably been independently acquired, appar- 
ently by the union of the two primary penes, with no invagina- 
tion to form a common ejaculatory duct. Otherwise we have 
to assume that the double or bipartite penis in the Ephemerida 
and Dermaptera as a secondary condition. 

The double genital apertures of female Ephemerida are 
likewise to be considered as probably a primitive character, 
although their position between the 7th and 8th sterna is 
secondary. The occurrence of a single aperture in both the 
Thysanura and the majority of the Pterygota must be regarded 
as a parallelism, and not a surprising one, as a tendency towards 
a distal union of the genital ducts is very common in the 
Arthropoda. 


60 | Annals Entomological Society of America [|Vol. XV, 


The retention of this primitive character together with 
others, such as the median cerciform appendage, jointed coxites, 
the numerous moults, occurrence of a subimago stage, etc., 
stamp the Ephemerida as far removed from other orders and 
indicate that their line of descent had separated off before those 
of the other orders had become differentiated. 

Next to the Ephemerida the Odonata are the most clearly 
circumscribed group, having no near allies among recent 
insects. The 9th sternum of the male preserves clear traces 
of the original division into sternite and coxites, and the lateral 
gonapophyses of the female are unique among Pterygote 
insects in retaining the styli in the adult stage. They also 
resemble the Thysanura (Machiloidea and Lepismoidea) some- 
what in the form of these structures and their relation to the 
other two pairs of gonapophyses. In their venation and 
general structure of the body they show no near relationship 
to the other groups here considered and may be regarded as 
having probably separated off next in order after the 
Ephemerida. 

In the remaining orders we may recognize two general 
trends of evolution. In the one the tarsi became 3-jointed (or 
remained thus), the ovipositor was reduced and subsequently in 
most cases wholly lost, the coxites of the male were fused with 
the 9th sternite, and the styli disappeared in both sexes. 

One of the branches from this stock gave rise to the 
Plecoptera and probably from the same branch arose the 
Embiidina. From another branch the Dermaptera were 
evolved. The cerci were originally segmented in all of these 
groups, but lost this primitive character in the Dermaptera. 
The ovipositor was probably reduced in the common ancestor 
of all these orders and completely disappeared in all but a few 
of the Dermaptera. 

The terminal abdominal structures, however, throw little 
light on the relationships of these groups and the views expressed 
here are based largely on the work of Crampton. 

The other trend of evolution among Orthopteroid insects 
shows itself in the presence of 5-jointed tarsi, a well developed 
ovipositor, the retention of separate styligerous coxites in the 
male and the loss of the double penis. In most of the modern 
descendants of this branch, however, the coxites of the male 
have fused with the 9th sternite, or with one another, in many 


1922| Walker: Structure of Orthopteroid Insects 61 


- 


the number of tarsal joints has been secondarily reduced, 
while in some the ovipositor has become vestigial or absent. 


In this assemblage of groups there are two types of genitalia 
so distinct as to indicate with some probability two main lines 
of divergence. In one of these we have the true Orthoptera, 
in which the primitive bilateral symmetry of the penis has been 
retained, but the organ has acquired a peculiarly complex 
structure very distinct from that of any other group. In the 
earliest representatives of this line (Protorthoptera?) there was 
undoubtedly a well-developed ovipositor without styli; a sub- 
genital plate was formed in the female from the 8th sternum 
and in the male from the fused coxites, which in all but the 
branch leading to the Acridoidea, united also with the 9th 
sternite. Styli were present in the males of primitive forms. 
The cerci were probably short and unsegmented or had few 
segments (as indicated by Tridactylus, in which the two-jointed 
cerci may be a secondary feature). The tarsi may have been 
5-jointed in the earliest forms, as suggested by many Tetti- 
gontide, but in all modern species the actual number of joints 
is 4 or less. The primitive plecopteroid form of body was. 
apparently lost at an early stage, correlated with the develop- 
ment of saltatorial hind legs. 


The second type of male genitalia is seen in the Phasmoidea, 
Grylloblattoidea, Blattoidea, Mantoidea and Zoraptera (?), 
and was doubtless present in the forbears of the Isoptera. 
This type of genitalia is asymmetrical and consists of the 
ejaculatory duct, sometimes borne upon a penis, between two 
unequally developed lobes or processes, right and left, which 
probably represent the parameres. The sagittal plane is 
usually so shifted that the right lobe overlies the left. Associated 
with this type of genitalia is a distinct tendency towards the 
reduction of the supra-anal plate. 


These peculiarities are least marked in the Phasmoidea, 
which probably separated first. In this group many of the 
primitive Plecopteroid characters have been retained, par- 
ticularly in the cervical sclerites, propleura, small and widely 
separated coxe, and in the presence 1n such primitive forms as 
Timema, of well developed intersegmental sclerites in front of 
the meso- and metaterga (Crampton, ’19). The cerci became 
short and lost their segmentation, while the male coxites fused 


62 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


as in the Orthoptera and lost their styl. The development 
in the female of a large subgenital plate from the 8th sternum 
also recalls the Orthoptera. These last features together with 
the rather strongly Orthopteroid wing-venation make the 
position of the order doubtful. It is perhaps equally well 
‘placed at the base of the Orthopteran stem, in which case the 
resemblance of the penis to that of the other orders in which 
it is asymmetrical must be looked upon as a case of con- 
vergence. * 


In the Grylloblattoidea the ovipositor is retained in its 
primitive exposed form, there being no distinct subgenital 
plate. The coxites in the male remain.separate from the 9th 
sternite, and the supra-anal plate, though small, is distinct in the 
adult. The Plecopteroid form of body is retained, with many 
primitive features, e. g., in the cervical sclerites, the propleura, 
and separate latero-sternites of the meso- and metasterna. 
The legs, however, are Blattoid and the coxe large and close 
together like all of the Blattoid groups. 


In the Blattoidea, Mantoidea and Isoptera so many common 
features are present that we need have no hesitation in con- 
sidering them as belonging to one common stock. The ovi- 
positor is concealed by a large subgenital plate, the modified 
sternum of the 7th abdominal segment. It is reduced in the 
Blattoidea and is vestigial or absent in the Isoptera. The 
coxites of the male have fused with the ninth sternite, but the 
styli are retained. The penis, except in the Isoptera, in which 
it has disappeared, is remarkable for its extreme asymmetry of 
structure, which as in Grylloblatta, may be shared by neighboring 
parts. The cerci tend to shorten, being generally reduced in 
the Isoptera to two segments. The supra-anal plate is replaced 
by the 10th tergum. Among other peculiarities is the form of 
the cervical sclerites, the ventral pair of which meet in the 
middle line. The tarsi are primitively 5-jointed, even in the 
Isoptera, in which the number of segments is commonly 
reduced. 

The exact relationship of the Isoptera to the other two 
orders is very uncertain. The form of the body and position of 
the head is more ‘‘plecopteroid’’ and hence apparently more 


* The abdominal musculature, according to Miss Ford, shows a nearer rela- 
tionship to the Blattoid-Mantoid type than to the Orthopteran type. 


1922| Walker: Structure of Orthopteroid Insects 63 


primitive than in these orders, but this may be due to adap- 
tation to a life in passages or galleries, in which the flattened 
form of the Blattids would be a disadvantage. The thoracic 
sclerites are simpler and in some respects apparently more 
primitive than those of the Blattids, as shown by Crampton, 
but these more primitive features may have been present in 
extinct cockroaches. The similarity of the two pairs of wings is 
evidently secondary, due to reduction of the anal area of the 
hind wings. This is indicated by the distinctly expanded anal 
area of the hind wings in the primitive genus Mastotermes, in 
which the venation also approaches more closely the Blattid 
type. On the whole, however, it 1s perhaps best to consider 
the Isoptera as springing from the Protoblattoidea, a palaeozoic 
order from which probably all three orders of the Blattoid 
group were developed. As far as the terminal abdominal 
structures are concerned the Blattoidea and Mantoidea are 
more like. one* another than are the various families of 
Orthoptera. 


The Zoraptera appear to have affinities with the Gryllo- 
blattoidea and the three orders just discussed. Like the former 
they are plecopteroid in the structure of the cervical sclerites, 
even more so, on account of the presence of a dorsal sclerite in 
this region (Crampton, ’20). The thoracic sclerites show 
points of resemblance to Grylloblatta and the Isoptera, while 
the coxez are large and much like those of Grylloblatta. The 
asymmetrical penis also apparently belongs to the type char- 
acteristic of the group of orders we have been discussing. On 
the other hand there is a loss in the male not only of the styli 
but of the 9th sternum itself (unless it be represented by the 
membranous lobe shown in Crampton’s figure) (1. c., Pl. VII, 
Fig. 2), a structure otherwise so conspicuous in this assemblage 
of groups. The lack of modification of the 7th abdominal 
sternum as a subgenital plate places it nearer Grylloblatta than 
the other three orders, but Crampton finds important points 
of resemblance with the Isoptera. The reduction of the tarsal 
joints to two and the cerci to a short unsegmented structure, 
and the modification of the anal plates are peculiarities which 
set this order somewhat apart from the others, but I should 
place it tentatively as a branch arising near the point of 
divergence of the Grylloblattoidea from the Protoblattoidea. 


64 Annals Entomological Society of America: [Vol. XV, 


This position is consistent with Crampton’s views as to its 
relationships with the Plecoptera and Isoptera and probably 
also the Psocida. 

These relationships are expressed in the accompanying 
table: (Pigs 7). 


&  Orthoptera 
e. 9 ef 
ses ee merang, Deeeheee 2 
© SG~- co oY sz uy Gis 
2lkog-s= Bats Nae ey aa ae vO 
or 0 Le aie es Ses SO ee ia eS 
£2 RSS FBb ce eee s ce at 
GMO Bet hag Gee yy tet Oy OO gee 
Se OO een es pea Oi eee ee oe 
2 ONG Pore Aaa JO =m 
rN 
Y, 
x 


. - 
Pere er” 


‘, Palaeoldict yoptera : 


4 
‘ 


a ° 
: - 
Cana eo 


Fig. 7. Phylogeny of Orthopteroid Insects. 


1922] Walker: Structure of Orthopteroid Insects 65 


ALPE NDEX. TO PART. I. 


There are a few matters discussed by Chopard (’20) in his 
excellent treatment of the female genitalia of the Orthoptera, 
on which my views do not quite coincide with his. The most 
important of these are the following: 


Origin of the “‘pileolus’’ and subgenital plate in the Tetti- 
gonoidea and Grylloidea. Chopard contends that the subgenital 
plate in these groups develops, not from the 8th sternum (ster- 
nite) but from the membrane between the 8th and 9th sterna. 
His observations on Pholidoptera femorata Fieber agree closely 
with mine on Ceuthophilus and Conocephalus and his conclusions 
are reasonable, but it appears to me unnecessary to give up the 
view that the subgenital plate is formed from the 8th sternum. 
According to Chopard the 8th sternum is already, at the 2nd 
nymphal stage, reduced to two lateral pads, one at the base of 
each ventral valve. During subsequent growth these become 
shifted more and more laterad and finally form the small 
triangular plate, which is termed by Chopard the “‘pileolus”’ 
(valvifer). The subgenital plate appears at the third nymphal 
stage in the form of a pad, or fold, arising from the membrane, 
which separates the base of the ovipositor from the 7th sternum. 
This view seems to imply that the ‘‘ genital pocket,’’ under the 
subgenital plate, is an infolding of the membrane, but it 
appears to me to be formed rather by an infolding of the 8th 
sternum itself, which is quite flexible in the young nymph; so 
that, according to the latter view, the subgenital plate may be 
interpreted as an outgrowth from the basal part of the 8th 
sternum. The greater part of the sternal area is thus represented 
by the lining membrane of the genital cavity. This view is sus- 
tained by Miss Ford’s findings in her study of the musculature 
of the parts in question, which are as yet unpublished. The 
two parts considered by Chopard to be the vestiges of the 8th 
sternum are the structures for which I have employed Cramp- 
ton’s term “‘basivalvula’’ and are, of course, quite properly 
assigned to this segment. But, although they do become 
shifted laterad, as Chopard states, they clearly do not become 
the pileolus or valvifer. This is derived from that part of the 
9th sternal area which lies laterad of the bases of the dorsal 
valvule. Even in the adult the intersegmental groove can be 


66 Annals Entomological Society of America  [Vol. XV, 


traced along the front margin of the valvifer, and the apodeme 
which runs along this boundary line is frequently continued 
along the front margin of the valvifer. Chopard’s ‘‘piéce 
laterale’’ in the Blattoidea and Mantoidea is the same structure 
and is likewise ascribed by him to the 8th sternum. The ‘‘piéce 
laterale en baguette’’ is the valvifer together with the inter- 
segmental apodeme which in the Blattids crosses a wide mem- 
branous area between the valvifer and the tergal margins. 

Position of the genital aperture in the Blattoidea and Man- 
toidea. Chopard maintains that the genital aperture in these 
groups lies between the 7th and 8th sterna, instead of occupy- 
ing its usual position between the 8th and 9th. This is a subject 
upon which I did not lay sufficient stress in Part I of this paper. 
The aperture in question has certainly experienced a forward 
shifting, as it lies distinctly cephalad of the bases of the ventral 
valves of the ovipositor, and is overhung by the “‘epigynum,”’ 
which I agree with Chopard in considering as the homologue 
of the subgenital plate of the Orthoptera. But, as I consider 
this plate to belong to the 8th sternum rather than the mem- 
brane between the 8th and 9th sterna, I should describe the 
genital aperture as occupying the Sth sternal area, although 
the sternum itself has virtually disappeared as an individual 
sclerite. The position of the genital aperture in the Orthoptera 
and Grylloblattoidea is not really fundamentally different 
from this. 

Ovipositor of the Isoptera. Since Part I of the present paper 
was published an interesting article by Crampton appeared 
entitled “‘The Terminal Abdominal Structures of the Primitive 
Australian Termite, Mastotermes darwinensis Froggatt (Cramp- 
ton, ’20). The important fact brought out is the presence in 
females of the solider caste in this species of three pairs of 
gonapophyses of distinctly primitive form, the lateral pair 
(dorsal valvule) terminating in well developed styli. As 
shown 1n Crampton’s figure the resemblance to the immature 
Blattid or Mantid is unmistakable, much closer than to Gryllo- 
blatta, although all of these four types are much alike in essen- 
tials. The short, broad lateral gonapophyses, clearly forming 
part of the 9th sternum, and the reduced 8th sternum, over- 
lapped by the large 7th sternum, are strongly Blattoid features. 


1922] Walker: Structure of Orthopteroid Insects 67 


The presence of these gonapophyses in Mastotermes is a 
clear proof of their having been present in the ancestral ter- 
mites, and confirms my interpretation of the extremely rudi- 
mentary structures in Termopsis, which I took to represent a 
vestigial ovipositor. 


IDR —levsdecdh dle 


P. 286, 11th line from bottom; R. forcipata is an error for 
R. forceps Sauss. The species figured, however, is R. car- 
bonaria Sauss. 

P. 315, 13th line from bottom; for “Ripipteryx forcipata 
Sauss.”’ read ‘“‘Ripipteryx carbonaria Sauss.”’ 

P. 316. The explanation of Fig. 34, as given, applies to 
Pigs 35, that,of Pig. 35 to Fig: 36; and so’on to the end, the 
last figure being No. 75, instead of 76. The correct explanation 
of Fig. 34, which was omitted, is as follows: 

34. Same; ventral view of dorsal and inner valvule. 


68 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


The following list includes only the titles of publications consulted in the 
preparation of this paper, and is by no means a complete bibliography. More 
complete lists are given by Crampton (’17b and ’18), Newell (18) and 
Chopard (’20). 


1911. BAUMGARTNER, W. J.—Observations on the Gryllide, IV, Copulation. 
(Kans. Univ. Sci. Bull., 5, p. 823). 

1882. BrRLESE, A.—Ricerche sugli organi genitali degli Ortotteri. (Attidella R. 
Acad. dei Lincei, 3a serie, vol. XI [1881-82], 42 pp., 2 pl.). 

1906-09. Jd.—Gli Insetti, loro organizzazione, svilluppo, abitudini e rapporti 
coll’uomo. I. Embriologia e Morfologia. (Societa Editrice Libraria. 
Milano. 1004 pp.). 

1915. BrEtTHuNE-BAKER, G. T.—The development of clasping organs in insects. 
(Trans. Ent. Soc. London, 1914, part V, pp. cxx-clxviii, with pls. C-N). 

1916. BRUNER, LAWRENCE.—South American Crickets. Gryllotalpoidea and 
Achetoidea. (Annals Carnegie Mus., 10, nos. 3 and 4, pp. 344-428). 

1876. BRUNNER VON WATTENWYL, C.—Die morphologische Bedeutung der Seg- 
mente, speziell des Hinterleibes bei den Orthopteren. (Festschr. zool.- 
bot. Ges. Wien, p. 1). 

1911. Burr, Matcotm.—Genera Insectorum. Dermaptera. (122me fasc., 
pp. 1-112, pls. 1-9). 

1917. CuHoparp, L.—Note préliminaire sur la conformation de l’extremité abdom- 
inale des Orthoptéres. (Arch. de zool. expérimentale et générale, 56, 
Notes et Revue No. 5, pp. 105-112). 

1918a. Jd.—Note préliminaire sur la conformation de l’organe copulateur des 
Orthoptéres. (Bull. Soc. Zool. de France, 43, pp. 59-67). 

1918b. Id.—Note sur un individu hermaphrodite de Clonopsis gallica Charp. 
(Bull. de la Soc. Zool. de France, 43, pp. 168-174). 

1920. Jd.—Recherches sur la conformation et le développement des derniers 
segments abdominaux chez les Orthopétres. (Rennes, Imprimerie 
Oberthur). 

1915. Crampton, G. C.—The thoracic sclerites and the systematic position of 
Grylloblatta campodeiformis Walk., a remarkable annectant ‘‘Orthop- 
teroid’’ insect. (Ent. News, 26, pp. 337-350, pl. 13). : 

1916. Jd.—The lines of descent of the lower Pterygotan insects, with notes on the 
relationships of the otherforms. (Ent. News, 27, pp. 244-258, 297-307). 

1917a. Id.—A phylogenetic study of the lateral head, neck and prothoracic regions 
in some Apterygota and lower Pterygota. (Ent. News 28, pp. 398-412, 
pl. 27). 

1917b. Id.—A phylogenetic study of the terminal abdominal segments and 
appendages in some female apterygotan and lower pterygotan insects. 
(Journ. N. Y. Ent. Soc., 25, pp. 225-251, pls. 16 and 17). 

1918. Id.—A phylogenetic study of the terminal abdominal structures and 
genitalia of male Apterygota, Ephemerida, Odonata, Plecoptera, 
Neuroptera, Orthoptera and their allies. (Bull. Brooklyn Ent. Soc., 
13, no. 7, pp. 49-68, pls. 2-6). 

1919a. Id.—Notes on the Phylogeny of the Orthoptera. (Ent. News, 30, pp. 
42-48, 64-74). 

1919b. Jd.—The genitalia and terminal abdominal structures of males, and the 
terminal abdominal structures of the larve of ‘‘Chalastogastrous 
Hymenoptera.’’ (Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash., 21, pp. 129-151, pls. 9-12). 

1920a. Id.—A comparison of the genitalia of male Hymenoptera, Mecoptera, 
Neuroptera, Diptera, Trichoptera, Lepidoptera, Homoptera and Strep- 
siptera with those of lower insects. (Psyche, 27, pp. 34-44, pl. 4). 


1922] Walker: Structure of Orthopteroid Insects 69 


1920b. Id—Some anatomical details of the remarkable winged Zorapteron, 
Zorotypus hubbardi Caudell, with notes on its relationships. (Proc. 
Ent. Soc. Wash., 22, pp. 98-106, pl. 7). 

1920c. Id.—The terminal abdominal structures of the primitive Australian ter- 
mite, Mastotermes darwinensis Froggatt. (Trans. Ent. Soc. London, 
parts I, II, pp. 137-145, with fig. 1 and pl. IV). 

1920d. Jd.—Remarks upon the basic plan of the terminal abdominal structures 
of the males of winged insects. (Can. Ent., 52, pp. 178-183, pl. VI). 

1879. Davis, H.—Notes on the pygidia and cerci of insects. (Jour. R. Micr. 
Soc., 2). 

1904. Drsneux, Jutes.—Genera Insectorum. Isoptera, fam. Termitide. (25me 
fasc., pp. 1-52, pls. 1-2). 

1893. DEenny, A.—On the development of the ovipositor in the cockroach. (Rep. 
63rd Meeting Brit. Assoc. Adv. Sc., 1, p. 818). 

1875. Derwitz, H.—Ueber Bau und Entwicklung des Stachels und Legescheide 
einiger Hymenopteren und der griinen Heuschrecke. (Zeit. wiss. Zool., 
25, pp. 174-200, pls. 12-13). 

1868. Eaton, A. E.—Remarks upon the homologies of the ovipositor. (Trans. 
Ent. Soc. London, 1868, p. 141-144). 

1888. Id—A revisional monograph of recent Ephemeride or Mayflies. (Trans. 
Linn. Soc., 2nd series, 3, Zool., London, 1888). 

1903. ENDERLEIN, G.—Ueber die Morphologie, Gruppierung und systematische 
Stellung der Corrodentien. (Zool. Anz., 26, pp. 423-437, 5 pls.). 

1912. Id—Embiiden. (Cat. Coll. Zool. Selys, fasc. III, pp. 1-121, pls. I-IV). 

1903. EscHericH, K.—Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Thysanuren. I Reihe. (Zool. 
Anz., 26, pp. 345-366). 

1904. Id—Das System der Lepismatiden. (Zoologica, 18, pp. 1-164, pls. 
I-IV). 

1913. GERHARDT, U.—Copulation und Spermatophoren von Grylliden und 
Locustiden. (Zool. Jahrb., 35, syst., pp. 415-532, pls. 17-18). 

1870. GraBer, V.—Die Aehnlichkeit im Baue der atsserlichen weiblichen 
Geschlechtsorgane bei den Locustiden und Akridiern auf Grund ihrer 
Entwicklungsgeschichte. (Sitzber. der K. Akad. d. wiss. Wien, 61, 
pp. 597-616, 1 pl.). 

1889. Id—Ueber den Bau und die phylogenetische Bedeutung der embryonalen 
Bauchanhange der Insekten. (Biol. Centralbl. 9, pp. 355-363). 

1889. Haase, E.—Die abdominalanhange der Insekten mit Berticksichtigung der 
Myriapoden. (Morph. Jahrb., 15, Heft 3, pp. 331-435, pls. 14-15). 

1903a. HANDLIRScH, A.—Zur Phylogenie der Hexapoden (Vorlauf. Mitt.). (Wien. 
Sitzungsb. Mathem. Naturw. Classe, 112, Abth. 1, pp. 716-738, 1 pl.). 

1903b. Id.—Zur Morphologie der Odonaten. (Ann. k.k. Naturhist. Hofmus., 18, 
Heft 1, pp. 117-122). 

1904. Jd.—Zur Systematik der Hexapoden. (Zool. Anz., 27, pp. 733-759). 

1908. Jd.—Die fossilen Insekten und die Phylogenie der rezenten Formen. 
(Leipzig, Wilhelm Engelmann. Pp. ix-1430, 51 pls.). 

1917. Herparp, Morcan.—The Blattide of North America, north of the Mexican 
Boundary. (Mem. Amer. Ent. Soc., No. 2, 284+-vi, pp., 10 pls.). 

1904. HrnnreGcuy, L. F—Les Insectes. Morphologie—Reproduction—Embryo- 
genie. (Paris, Masson & Cie, 804 pp., 4 pls., 622 figs.). 

1895. Hrymons, R.—Ueber die abdominalen Korperanhange der Insekten. 
(Biol. Centralbl., 24, pp. 854-864). 

1896. Jd.—Zur Morphologie der Abdominalanhange bei den Insekten. (Morph. 
Jahrb., 24, pp. 178-203, pl. 1). 

1897, Jd.—Entwicklungsgeschichtliche an Lepisma saccharina L. (Zeitschr. wiss. 
Zool., 62, pp. 583-631, pls. 29-30). 


70 


1899. 
1912. 
1912. 
1853. 
1855a. 
1855b. 


1886. 


1918. 
1882. 
1913. 
1868. 


1883. 


1898. 
1915. 


1893a. 


1893b. 


1895. 


1913. 
1894. 


1863. 


1915. 


1915), 


1897. 


Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


Id.—Der morphologische Bau des Insektenabdomens. (Zool. Centralbl., 
VI Jahrg., No. 16, pp. 537-556). 

Id.—Ueber den Genitalapparat und die Entwicklung von Hemimerus 
talpoides. (Zool. Jahrb., Supp. 15, 2, pp. 141-184). 

KLAPALEK,, -F .—Plecoptéres. 1. Fam: Perlodide. (Cat. Coll. Zool. 
Selys, fasc. 4, 66 pp, 58 figs.). 

LacazE-DuTHIERS, F. J. H.—Recherches sur l’armure génitale femelle des 
Insectes.. (Ann. Sc. Nat., 17 [1852]. pp. 206-251, pls. 10, 11, 12). 

LespEs, C.—Mémoire sur les Spermatophores des Grillons. (Ann. Sc. 
Nat., 4, série, 3, pp. 366-377, pl. X). 

Id.—Deuxieme not sur les Spermatophores du Gryllus sylvestris. (Ann. 
des Sc. Nat., 4 série, 4, pp. 244-249, pl. 8B). 

MILL, L. C., Et DENNY, A.—The structure and life-history of the cock- 

roach (Periplaneta orientalis). An introduction to the study of insects. 

(London, Lovell, Reeve & Co., 224 pp.). 

NEWELL, ANNA GRAcE.—The comparative morphology of the genitalia of 

insects. (Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer., 11, no. 2, pp. 109-142). é 

Nussaum, J.—Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Atisfuhrungsgange der 

Sexualdrtsen bei den Insecten. (Zool. Anz., 5, pp. 637-648). 

MorGan, ANNA H,—A contribution to the biology of May-flies. (Ann. 
Ent. Soc. Amer., 6, pp. 371-418, pls. XLII-LIV). 

PacKarRD, A. S.—On the structure of the ovipositor and homologous parts 
in the male insect. (Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., 11, pp. 393-399). 

Id.—The systematic position of the Orthoptera in relation to other orders 
ofinsects. (Third Rep. U.S. Ent. Commission, Washington, pp. 281-345, 
pl. 23-62). 

Id.—A Text-book of Entomology. (London, the MacMillan Co., 729 pp.). 


PANTEL, J.—Notes orthoptérologiques. VI Le ‘‘vomer sous-anal’’ n’est pas 
le ‘‘titillateur;’’ étude des segments abdominaux et principalement du 
segment terminal des males chez les Phasmides. (Ann. Soc. Ent. 
France, (1915), pp. 173-233, pls. 2-5). 

PEYTOUREAU. A.—Recherches sur l’anatomie et le développement de ]’armure 
génitale male des insectes Orthoptéres. (Comp. Rend. Ac. Sc., 117 
pp. 293-295). 

Id.—Recherches sur l’anatomie et le développement de l’armure génitale 
femelle des Insectes Orthoptéres. (Comp. Rend. Ac. Sc., 117, pp. 
749-751). 

Id.—Remarques sur l’organisation, l’anatomie comparée et le développe- 
ment des derniers segments du corps des Insectes Orthoptéres. (Thése 
Bordeaux, 248 pp.. 22 pls.). 

PRELL, HEINRICH.—Das Chitinskelett von Eosentomon, ein Beitrag zur 
Morphologie der Insektenkérpers. (Zoologica, 25, pp. 1-58, pls. I-VI). 
SAUSSURE, H. DE, AND ZEHNTNER, LEO.—Notice morphologique sur les 

Gryllotalpiens. (Rev. Suisse de Zool., 2, fasc. 2, pp. 403-430, pls. 16-17). 

ScHauM, H.—Ueber die Zusammensetzung des Kopfes und die Zahl der 
Abdominalsegmente bei den Insekten. (Arch. fur Naturgesch., 29, 
pp. 247-260, pl. 11; pp. 365-367). 

SCHMIDT, ErRicH.—Vergleichende Morphologie des 2 und 38 Abdominal- 
Seams bei mannliche Libellen. (Zool. Jahrb., 39, Heft 1. pp. 87-200. 
pls. 9-11). 

Sm:TH, Lucy Wrieut.—Studies of North American Plecoptera (Pter- 
onarcinze and Perlodini). (Trans..Am, Ent. Soc., 43, pp. 433-489, pis. 
29-34). 

UzeL, H.—Beitrage zur Entwicklungsgeschichte von Campodea staphy- 
linus. (Zool. Anz., 20, pp.). 


1922] 


Walker: Structure of Orthopteroid Insects Fl 


VAN DER WEELE, H. W.—Morphologie und Entwicklung der Gonapophysen 
(Tijdschrift voor Entomologie, 49, pp. 99-198, pls. 1-3). 


VerRHOoEFF, K. W.—Zur vergleichenden Morphologie der Coxalorgane und 


(Zool. Anz., 26, pp. 60-77, 15 figs.). 
3 Aufsatz; die Entwicklungs- 


Verson, E.—Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der mannliche Geschlechts- 


(Can. Ent., 


Id.—On the male and immature state of Grylloblatta campodeiformis Walker. 


Wescue, W.—The male genitalia of the cockroach, Periplaneta orientalis, 


(Journ. Quekett 


1906. 
der Odonaten. 
1903. 
Genitalanhange der Tracheaten. 
1910. Jd.—Urber Felsenspringer, Machiloiden. 
stufen. (Zool. Anz., 36, pp. 385-399). 
1904. 
anhange bei Insekten. (Zool. Anz., 27, p. 470). 
1914. Waker, E. M.—On a new genus and family of Orthoptera. 
46, pp. 93-99. pl. 6). 
1919. 
(Can. Ent., 51, pp. 131-139, pls. 8, 9). 
1908. 
and their homology with the genitalia in Diptera. 
micr. Club, 2, 10, pp. 235-242, 2 pls.). 
1893. 


8, pp. 1-160). 


WHEELER, W. M.—A contribution to insect embryology. 


(Journ. Morph., 


1911. ZACHER, FRIEDRICH.—Studien ueber das System der Protodermapteren. 
(Zool. Jahrb., 30, syst., pp. 303-400, 80 figs.). 


1903. 
Hexapoden. 
14 figs.). 


ZANDER, EnocH.—Der Stilplan des mannlichen Genitalapparates der 
(Diss. Erlang. Ven. Leg. K. B. Fried. Alex. Univ., pp. 1-43, 


REFERENCE LETTERING. 


~ 


ar—Arch of endapophysis. 
bc—basipodite of cercus. 
c—cercus. 

cf—caudal filament or telofilum. 
ch—copulatory hook. 
cl—clasper. 


cx, cx 9—coxite, coxite of 9th segment. 


exx—coxale or united coxites. 
exl, exr—left and right coxites. 
dl—dorsal lobes of penis. 
ej—ejaculatory duct. 
end—endapophysis. 

fps—floor of paramere sac. 

gl p—glans of penis or penis lobe. 
int s m—intersternal membrane. 
int t m—intertergal membrane. 
ll—left paramere lobe. 
Ist—lateral stylet. 

m st—median stylet. 
pa—paraproct. 

pal—pallium. 

pal pl—pallial plate. 


pc—postcornua or processes ‘of [pseudo- 


sternite. 
pe—penis. 
pg—paragenital plate. 


(For additional lettering, see explanation of figures). 


pm—paramere, or itS main process; 
ectoparamere. 

pmb—base of paramere, endoparamere. 

pmo—opening into paramere. 

pms—paramere sac. 

pst—pseudosternite. 

ra—ramus of pseudosternite. 

rl—right paramere lobe. 

s 7, s 8, etc.—sternum of 7th, of 8th 
segment, etc. 

sa—supra-anal plate. 

sp—spiracle. 

sp gl—lateral glandular pouches. 

spe—sperm conveyor. 

sps—spermatophore sac. 

st, st 7, etc.—sternite, sternite of seg- 
ment 7, etc. 

stl, stl 7, etc——stylus, stylus of 7th 
segment, etc. 

svl—subventral lobe. 

t 7, t 8, etc.—tergum of 7th segment, of 
8th segment, etc. 

v—virga. 

vl—ventral lobe of penis. 

vs—dorso-median spines of spermato- 
phore sac. 


(7 


nN Re 


ge eae eras 


=e 


10. 


1 
12. 
13. 
14. 


15. 


16. 
ie 


18. 


19; 


20. 
21. 


22. 


Annals Entomological Society of America  [Vol. XV, 


EXPLANATION OF PLATES. 


PLATE I. 


Machilis sp. (Machiloidea). Ventral view of terminal segments. 


Blasturus nebulosus Walk. (Ephemerida). Ventral view of terminal 
segments. 


Same, ventral view of penis. 

Callibaetis ferrugineus Walsh. (Ephemerida). Ventral view of terminal seg- 
ments. 

Forficula auricularia L. (Dermaptera). Lateral view of terminal segments. 

Same, ventral view of penis. 

Anisolabis maritima (Gene). (Dermaptera). Ventral view of end of 
abdomen. 

Same, ventral view of penis. 

Oligotoma saundersii Westw. (Embiidina). Dorsal view of end segments. 
tap 10, 1 ap 10, right and left copulatory appendages of 10th tergum. 

Same, ventral view of end segments. Lettering as in Fig. 9. 


PLATE If; 


Capnia vernalis Newp. (Plecoptera). Dorsal view of end segments. 
Same, ventral view of end segments. 
Same, lateral view of end segments. 


Isogenus frontalis Newm. (Plecoptera). Dorso-caudal view of end segments, 
the 10th and anal segments being somewhat upturned. sc, sac containing 
stylets, formed by invagination of the supra-anal plate. The 10th tergum 
is also divided into hemitergites by a median invagination, which forms a 
ventral apodeme. 


Same; dorsal view of separated 10th and anal segments. The hemitergites 
of segment 10 are somewhat spread apart to expose the supra-anal plate. 
m ap, apodeme formed by invagination of 10th tergum. 


Same, ventral view of isolated supra-anal plate. sc, sac containing the 
stylets and supported laterally by the paragenital plates. 


Same, lateral view of isolated supra-anal plate, together with ventral apodeme 
(m ap), formed by median invagination of 10th tergum. sc as in Fig. 16; 
bb, basal bar connecting stylets with apodeme. 

Isoperla sp. (Plecoptera). Ventral view of end segments. The copulatory 
hooks are processes of the paraprocts. Segments 8 to 10 are annular, the 
terga and sterna being fused. 


Perla tristtis Hag. (Plecoptera). Ventral view of end segments, the 9th 
sternum partly cut away to show the penis. Copulatory hooks as in 
Fig. 18. The 10th sternum is not separable from the intersternal 
membrane. 

Same, ventral view of penis. 


Aeshna canadensis Walk. (Odonata). Ventral view of terminal segments. 


PuaTE III. 
(Orthoptera—Tettigonoidea). 


Ceuthophilus lapidicola Burm. Posterior view of penis with parameres 
retracted; fps, a temporary fold, formed by the retraction of the para- 
meres and dividing the shallow spermatophore sac into an upper and 
lower part, the upper part corresponding to the paramere sac of most 
Tettigonoidea (Figs. 30 and 32), and the spermatophore sac in the 
Gryllide; pmo, opening into the invaginated parameres. 


1922] Walker: Structure of Orthopteroid Insects Ce) 


23. 
24. 


25. 


26. 


27. 
28. 


29. 


30. 


31. 
32. 
33. 
34. 


35. 


36. 


37. 


38. 


39. 
40. 
41. 
42. 


43. 


Same, posterior view of penis with parameres everted. The spermatophore 
sac is obliterated and the genital aperture concealed by the ventral lobe. 
Same, lateral view of penis with parameres almost completely everted. 

Potash preparation. 


Same, dorsal view of penis, with parameres retracted and inner parts 
exposed. Potash preparation. The parameres are unnaturally retracted 
owing to removal of enveloping muscles. 


Ceuthophilus aridus Bruner? Posterior view of end of abdomen with penis 
very strongly retracted. The roof of the penis is drawn below the level 
of the ventral lobe, the walls thus forming a pair of lateral ridges. The 
pseudosternite is forcibly elevated to show the small arched passage (ar ej), 
which bridges over the ejaculatory duct in the retracted condition. 


Ceuthophilus maculatus (Harr.). Posterior view of end of abdomen, the 
penis everted, but the parameres probably only partly so. 

Ceuthophilus lapidicola (Burm.). Late nymphal stage. Dorsal view of penis 
with internal parts exposed. Potash preparation. 


PRare FY, 
(Orthoptera—Tettigonoidea). 

Neduba carinata Walk. Posterior view of endofabdomen. vs,* the valve-like 
plates on the under side of the fold (fps) that separates the spermatophore 
sac proper from the paramere sac. 

Same, dorsal view of separated penis; potash preparation. The pseudosternite 
(pst) is represented only by a membranous fold (cut away on the right 
side). pmo, opening into paramere, occupied by muscles in the natural 
condition. 

Same, lateral view of separated penis; potash preparation. 

Conocephalus brevipennis (Scudd.). Posterior view of penis. 

Same, dorsal view of penis. 

Conocephalus fasciatus (DeGeer). Last stage of nymph; posterior view of 
end of abdomen. The parameres are represented only by a slight chitini- 
zation of the roof of the penis, just inside the wide genital aperture. 

Cyphoderris monstrosa Uhl. Posterior view of end of abdomen. cps, a large, 
hook-like copulatory process, arising from the vertically placed sternum 
of segment 9. 

Same, lateral view of the 9th sternum, showing the large copulatory 
process (cps). 


PLATE V. 


(Grylloidea and Tridactyloidea). 


Gryllus assimilis (Fabr.). (Grylloidea). Dorsal view of separated penis, 
ventral lobes omitted. The integument is cut through just in front of the 
pseudosternite. 

Same, ventral view of penis, the free parts of the ventral lobes cut off in order 
to show the spermatophore sac and_ structures underlying the 
pseudosternite. 

Same, lateral view of separated penis; potash preparation. 

Same, postero-ventral view of genitalia of last nymphal stage. 

Same, ventral view of genitalia of last nymphal stage. 

Nemobius fasciatus (DeGeer). (Grylloidea). Dorsal view of separated 
genitalia. The anterior, lighter part of the pseudosternite lies beneath the 
outer integument. The ventral lobes are represented as showing through 
from above. 

Same, ventral view of genitalia. 


*sv, in Figs. 30 and 31. 


74 


44, 


45. 
46. 
47. 


48. 
49. 


50. 


51. 
52. 
53. 
54. 
50. 


56. 


57. 


58. 


60. 


61. 


62. 
63. 
64. 


65. 
66. 
67. 
68. 


Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


Oecanthus nigricornis Walk. Dorsal view of separated genitalia; potash 
preparation. 


Same, posterior view of genitalia. 
Same, lateral view of genitalia; potash preparation. 


Ripipteryx carbonaria Sauss. (Tridactyloidea). Dorsal view of terminal 
segments. ch, copulatory hooks, apparently arising from the paraprocts. 


Same, lateral view of terminal segments. Lettering as in Fig 47. 


Same, dorsal view of penis; potash preparation. In front of the reflected 
integument (int) the organ lies beneath the outer surface. 


Same, right lateral view of penis; potash preparation. 


PLATE VI. 
(Orthoptera—Acridoidea). 


Dissosteira carolina L.. Dorsal view of terminal segments. 

Same, dorsal view of genitalia; potash preparation. 

Same, ventral view of genitalia; potash preparation. 

Same, lateral view of genitalia; potash preparation. 

Melanoplus bivittatus (Say). Dorsal view of genitalia; parts in their natural 
position. 

Same, dorsal view of genitalia with the pseudosternite omitted; potash 


preparation. The dorsal and ventral lobes are spread apart so as to show 
their relations to the parameres and to one another. 


Same, ventral view of genitalia; potash preparation. The ventral lobes 
are spread apart to show the entire parameres. The ejaculatory duct 
is cut off at its junction with the spermatophore sac. 


Tettigidea lateralis parvipennis (Harr.). Left lateral view of terminal seg- 
ments. The pallial plates are elevated, exposing the proximal part of 
the rami. 


Same, antero-dorsal view of genitalia. Only the anterior edges of the 
pallial plates are seen, these plates being elevated to expose the genital 
cavity. 

Acrydium granulatum Kirby. Antero-dorso-lateral view of terminal segments. 
gc, opening into the genital cavity; pal h, pallial hooks. 

Melanoplus bivittatus (Say). Median sagittal section through genitalia. 


PLATE: VII. 
(Grylloblattoidea). 


Grylloblatta campodeiformis E. Walk. Dorsal view of terminal segments. 
Same, ventral view of terminal segments. 


Same, posterior view of end of abdomen. cxp, process borne by right coxite, 
and forming with cl and lm a copulatory clasping apparatus; es, eversible 
sac, arising from left paramere lobe; at 10, arm of 10th tergum, with 
terminal sucker-like disc. 


Same, ventro-posterior view. 

Same, half-grown nymph. Ventral view of terminal segments. 
Same, full-grown (?) nymph. Ventral view of terminal segments. 
Same, full-grown nymph. Posterior view of end of abdomen. 


1922] Walker: Structure of Orthopteroid Insects 65 


69. 


70. 


aL: 


72. 
73. 
74, 


75. 
76. 


(ithe 
78. 


TAR 


80. 


81. 


82. 
83. 


84. 


85. 


86. 
87. 


88. 


89. 
90. 


ot. 


92, 


Puate VIII. 
(Grylloblattoidea, Phasmoidea, Isoptera, Zoraptera). 


Grylloblatta campodeiformis E. Walk. Right lateral view of terminal seg- 
ments. cxp, spur-like process of right coxite; es, eversible sac arising 
from left paramere lobe. 


Same, left lateral view of terminal segments. 


Anisomorpha buprestoides (Stoll). (Phasmoidea). Ventral view of terminal 
segments. dpl, dorsal plate; vpl, ventral plate. 


Same, dorsal view of penis. 
Same, ventral view of penis. 


Diapheromera femorata (Say). (Phasmoidea). Dorsal view of penis. ap, 
apodeme arising from base of cl; dpl, dorsal plate; pm (?) cornu, possibly 
representing the left paramere. 


Same, ventral view of penis. Lettering as in Fig. 74. 


Termopsis angusticollis Hagen (Isoptera). Ventral view of terminal 
segments. 


Same, left lateral view of terminal segments 


Zorotypus hubbardi Caudell. (Zoraptera). Left atera: view of terminal 
segments. (After Crampton). 


Same, dorsal view of genitalia. (After Crampton). 


PLATE IX. 
(Blattoidea). 


Blattella germanica (L.). Posterior view of end of abdomen. The thin flap 
of the tenth tergum is elevated and the ninth sternum depressed to show 
the genitalia. 


Same, dorsal view of genitalia and underlying parts, after removal of terga. 
The paraprocts are spread apart. The hooked left paramere is retracted 
into its sheath (sh). aps 9, apophysis of 9th sternum. 


Same, dorsal view of right paramere. The “‘clasper’’ (cl) probably serves 
here only for the attachment of muscles. 


Same, ventral view of right paramere. 


Parcoblatta pensylvanica (Burm.). Posterior view of end of abdomen, the 
9th sternum cut away to show the genitalia. The left paramere is 
retracted, only the end of the hook being exposed. Each paraproct 
bears a copulatory hook, of which the right is large and heavily chitinized. 


Same, dorsal view of right paramere. The ‘‘clasper’’ (cl) probably only 
serves for the attachment of muscles. 


Same, ventral view of right paramere. 
Same, dorsal view of left paramere, partly everted from its sheath. 


Same, posterior view of abdomen of young nymph. showing the vestigial 
supra-anal plate. 


Periplaneta sp., last stage of nymph. Ventral view of genitalia. 
Same, ventral view of genitalia. with penis lobe (gl p) depressed. 


PLATE X., 
(Blattoidea). 


Periplane-a fuliginosa Brunn. Dorsal view of right paramere. dcl, dorsal 
vaive of clasper; pml, shaft o: paramere, terminating in the processes 
pm!, pm?, ete. 

Same, ventral view of right paramer . vel. ventral vaive of clasper. For 
other lettering see Fig. 91. 


76 


100. 


101. 


102. 
102. 
103. 


104. 


105. 


106. 


107. 
108. 
109. 


Annals Entomological Society of America _[Vol. XV, 


Same, ventro-lateral view of right paramere, the two valves of the clasper, 
dorsal (del) and ventral (vcl) forced open. 


Same, dorsal view of left paramere or paramere lobe. pm, shaft of paramere; 
11, 112, etc., secondary processes from paramere lobe. 


Same, lateral view of left paramere. Lettering as in Fig. 94. 


Periplaneta brunnea Burm. Ventral view of right paramere. For lettering 
see Figs. 91 and 92. 


Same, dorsal view of left paramere. Lettering as in Fig. 94. 


Periplaneta americana L. Ventral view of right paramere. For lettering 
see Figs. 91 and 92. 


Same, dorsal view of left paramere. Lettering as in Fig. 94. 


PLATE XI. 
(Blattoidea, Mantoidea). 


Periplaneta fuliginosa Brunn. (Blattoidea). Dorso-posterior view of 
genitalia, the 9th sternum strongly depressed. pm, main shaft of left 
paramere; the secondary processes borne by ll lying to the right; pm!, 
basal part of shaft of right paramere; pm?, the principal terminal process. 


Blaberus atropos Serv. (Blattoidea). Posterior view of end of abdomen, 
the 9th sternum, which is asymmetrical, somewhat depressed to show 
the genitalia. The 10th tergum is foreshortened. The right paramere, 
a long copulatory hook, is completely retracted within its sheath. The 
right paramere lobe extends far to the left in the form of a horizontal 
flap. 

Same, left paramere. 

Same, dorsal view of left paramere. df, dorsal flap. 


Same, postero-dorsal view of left paramiere, with the dorsal flap (df) 
reflected. 


Stagmomantis carolina (L.) (Mantoidea). Posterior view of end of abdomen, 
the 9th sternum strongly depressed. Ipm, the main process of the left 
paramere lobe, probably homologous with pm in Fig. 100; 111, 11?, pro- 
cesses from left paramere lobe; df, dorsal flap of right paramere (cf. 
Figs. 100 and 101). 


Same, dorsal view of genitalia in natural position. The clasper (cl) is 
represented as showing through, as ina cleared preparation. r pmb, base 
of right paramere. Other lettering as in Fig. 104. 

Same, ventral view of genitalia. rpm, 1 pm, right and left paramere bases. 
Other lettering as in Fig. 104. 

Same, ventral view of isolated right paramere. 

Same, lateral view of left paramere. Lettering as in Fig. 104. 

Newly hatched nymph of undetermined Japanese Mantid. Ventral view 
of terminal segments, showing well-marked supra-anal plate and processes 
of the 9th sternum, representing coxites and styli. 


Annas £. S.A Von. XV, Plate I. 


E. M. Walker. 


ANNALS E. S, A. Vou. XV; Prats Il. 


E. M. Walker. 


Annats E. S. A. Vou. XV, Puate III. 


E. M. Walker. 


7 t8 t10t9- 


cps 


E. M. Walker. 


Vou. XV, Puiate IV. 


Annats E. S. A. Vou. XV, Puate V. 


M. Walker. 


Vou. XV, Puate VI. 


Annats E. S. A. 


E. M. Walker. 


Awnats E. S. A. Vou. XV, Prats VII. 


“ef Athy Y 
Uri ipiites Vash dy AAI AY Wn eee 
Mec ae ee 


E. M. Walker. 


ANNALS E. S. A. VoL. XV, PLATE Vill. 


EM. Walker. 


ANNALS E. S. A. Vou. XV, Puate IX. 


E. M. Walker. 


ANNALS E. S. A. Vou. XV, PuatTE X. 


ANNALS E. S. A. Vou. XV, Puate XI. 


E. M. Walker. 


A REVIEW OF SOME GENERIC NAMES IN THE 
ORDER LEPIDOPTERA 


Wo. Barnes, M. D., AND A. W. LinDsEy, MS., Ph. D., 
Decatur, Illinois. 


In the preparation of our Catalogue of North American 
Lepidoptera we have determined to investigate the history of 
all generic names now in use, and others as far as they con- 
cern us, in order to be certain that the use of the terms is 
correct according to the principles laid down in the “ Inter- 
national Rules of Zoological Nomenclature.’’ We use Small- 
wood’s edition of these rules, and are indebted to Mr. F. H. 
Benjamin for information on some later opinions, notably that 
dealing with Lamarck’s citations of 1801 which have been 
accepted by some writers as valid fixations. We are informed 
by Mr. Benjamin that these are repudiated in an opinion of 
the International Committee on Nomenclature. This action 
is strictly in harmony with the body of the rules as applied to 
Lamarck’s work. 

The one other set of rules which we have considered is the 
‘‘Entomological Code”’ of Banks and Caudell. We favor these 
rules, for they are stated with enviable clearness and concise- 
ness, but feel that the International Rules should be followed 
by all zoologists, from the very nature of théir origin. The 
only point of extreme difference in the two is that the Code 
does not permit a species to be the type of two different genera, 
unless, of course, it be the orthotype of the second, established 
through oversight after becoming the type of the first. While 
this simplifies the fixation of a type in some cases, it frequently 
makes a decision more difficult. 

In the relatively small part of the order now examined, we 
find so many radical changes that we feel it wise to present our 
conclusions thus far to the entomological fraternity, so that the 
sharp criticism which we frankly expect may have time to 
bear fruit in a more or less definite general opinion. Our own 
attitude to this subject is that, while intensely interesting 
research, the entire problem is so purely accessory to the true 
aim of science that it should be reduced to a firm basis as 


89 


90 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


speedily as possible. This basis is established for us by the 
International Rules, and we are heartily in favor of working 
out the standing of our genera according to these rules, accept- 
ing whatever radical changes they produce, and turning a deaf 
ear to the cries of those who would continue to make personal 
opinion their ultimate guide. 


ASCIIDZ. 


Ascia Scopoli Logotype Papilio monuste Linn. 


1777. Scopoli, Int. Hist. Nat. 434; Crataegi, napi, sinapis, monuste, polybe. 
1872. Scudder, 4th Rept. Peab. Acad. 61, cites monuste as type. 

1875. Id., Hist. Sk. 121-2, confirms this citation. 

1918. Hampson, Nov. Zool. XXV, 385, cites crataegi as type. 


Owing to Scudder’s action in 1872 this genus must be regarded as 
valid, and will replace Pieris in our fauna. As a result of this the 
family name becomes A sciid@. Hampson uses crategi as type, following 
the first species principle, which is not permissible under the Inter- 
national Rules. He arrives, however, at the same conclusion regarding 
the family name, which he spells Asciade. 


SATYRIDZ. 


MEcIsto Hbn. Logotype Papilio eurytus Fab. 

1818. Huebner, Verz. bek. Schmett. 54; Cymelia (eurttus), argante, euridice 
(canthus, camerta), acmenis. 

1868. Butler, Cat. Satyr. B. M. 14, Cites eurytus (euritus, cymelia) as type. 

1872. Scudder, 4th Rept. Peab. Acad. 27, follows Butler. 

“1875. Id., Hist. Sk. 218, says that this was incorrect because ‘‘eurytus is 
strictly congeneric with penelope, the type of Cissia,’’ and cites acmenis 
as type. 


Butler’s citation of ewrytus was valid and Scudder’s later citation 
of acmenis ultra vires. As a result we must use Megisto to replace Cissia, 
type penelope. 


ARGUS Scopoli. Logotype Papilio eurydice Joh. 

1777. Scopoli, Int. Hist. Nat. 432; a heterogeneous group including eurydice. 

1872. Scudder, 4th Rept. Peab. Acad. 27, cites eurydice as type. 

1875. Id., Hist. Sk. 118, discards this genus because of its original hetero- 
geneous nature. This may have been a desirable course, but it seems 
entirely indefensible, since the genus had already been given a valid 
type and definite generic usage in the modern sense. 

1888. Id., Butt. New. Eng. I, 187, under Satyrodes, cites Argus Scudder (not 
Scopoli). 


We see no way to avoid using this genus in place of Satyrodes. 


HELICcoNIus Linn. Logotype Papilio psidit Linn. 
1758. Linneaus, Syst. Nat. Ed. X, 458. Many species, including Danaide, 
Parnassune and Heliconiine (of authors). 
1810. Latreille, Consid. Gen. 440, cites polymnia and horta as types. Neither 
of these species belongs to Heliconius Auct. 


1922]. Barnes and Lindsey: Generic Names in Lepidoptera 91 


1872. Crotch, Cist. Ent. I, 60, cites psidii as type, giving Lamarck as 
authority. While Lamarck’s work does not actually fix the type, 
Crotch’s definitely cites ‘‘Type H. psidii Linn.,’’ and we believe that 
his must be regarded as a valid fixation. 

1875. Scudder, Hist. Sk. 185, cites Antiochus as type, but credits the genus to 
Latreille and says that Crotch was in error in referring the genus back 
to Linnaeus, Linnaeus’ Heliconii, however, form as valid a genus as 
any other of his subdivisions of Papilio, and he does use the singular, 
Heliconius, in the page headings. Hence we regard this as truly a 
Linnean genus, and Scudder's action as ultra vires. 

1913. Seitz, Macrolep. (2), V, 377, uses Heliconius Latr. 


As a result of this history of Heliconius, we have concluded that 
it must be dropped from our lists, for psidii is a Danaid and no con- 
generic species is found in our fauna. The subfamily H eliconiine must 
be renamed and since Hampson has already applied the name Eueidine 
(which he spells, incorrectly, Euidine), we adopt that term. Since 
Heliconius does not take the place of Danaus we see no reason to change 
the family name Danaide. 


Miconitis Hbn. Logotype Papilio erato Linn. 


1816. Huebner, Verz. bek. Schmett, 12; erato and others. 
1875. Scudder, Hist. Sk. 218, cites erato as type. 


Migonitis takes the place of Heliconius Auct. 


Dryas Hbn. Haplotype Papilio paphia Linn. 
1806. Huebner; Tentamen. Paphia sole species and therefore type. 
Argynnis Fab. Logotype Papilio paphia Linn. 
1807. Fabricius, Ill. Mag. VI, 283, paphia, cynara, cethosia, aglatja, liriope, 
morpheus, hermes. 


1810. Latreille, Consid. Gen. 440, cites paphia as type. 
1816. Dalman, Vetensk. Akad. Handl. XXXVII, 57-66, cites adippe as 


type. 

1830. Curtis, Brit. Ent. Lep. I, 290, cites aglaia as type. 

1875. Scudder, Hist. Sk. 118; cites aglaia as type and says that Latreille cited 
paphia and cinxia, whereas the latter appears to be mentioned in 
synonymy. Other writers have followed Latreille and Curtis. 


We regard paphia as the type of Argynnis, though there may be 
some slight doubt concerning Latreilles’ citation of both paphia and 
cinxia. If it can be definitely shown that these were cited as two types, 
Dalman’s fixation must prevail. All appear to be congeneric. The 
Tentamen genus, Dryas, must take the place of the more familiar name 
in either case, however, if we are to observe the generic limits adopted 
by most writers. 


Lemonias Hbn. Haplotype Papilio maturna Linn. 
1806. Huebner, Tentamen, maturna sole species and therefore type. 


Melitaea Fab. Logotype Papilio cinxia Linn. 
1807. Fabricius, Ill. Mag. VI, 284; lucina, cinxia, cynthia, maturna. 
1816. Dalman, Vetensk. Akad. Handl. XXXVII, 57, cites athalia as 
type, but incorrectly, for it was not included by Fabricius. 
1840. Westwood, Gen. Syn. 88, cites cinxia as type. This appears to be 
the first valid type fixation. 


92 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


We have felt some doubt whether Lemonias of the Tentamen or 
Lemonias of the Sammiung was first published, but Huebner’s statement 
in the preface to the Verzeichniss to the effect that the Tentamen was 
drawn up as a basis for the other work, leads us to the conclusion that 
the Tentamen has priority, hence Lemonias becomes a nymphalid genus 
and takes the place of Melitea. This usage is not uncommon in the 
literature. 


Hamapryas Hbn. Haplotype Papilio io Linn. 
1806. Huebner, Tentamen. Jo sole species and therefore type. 


To, urtice and antivpa are generally regarded as congeneric, hence 
Hamadryas must be used for the group, supplanting both Aglais Dal. 
and Euvanessa Scud. 


Cyntuia Fab. Logotype Papilio cardui Linn. 
1807. Fabricius, Il]. Mag. VI, 281; cardui and other species. 
1840. Westwood, Gen. Syn. 87, cites cardui as type. 
1872. Crotch, Cist. Ent. I, 66, also cites cardui, but the date of fixation which 
he gives is not in accordance with modern rules. 
1875. Scudder, Hist. Sk. 152, says that cardui cannot be the type because 
‘St is strictly congeneric with atalanta—type of Vanessa,”’ a view which 
is obviously untenable. He cites arsinoe as type. 
Vanessa Fab. Logotype Papilio atalanta Linn. 


1807.. Fabricius, Ill. Mag. VI, 281; io, atalanta, urtice, levana. 
1810. Latreille, Consid. Gen. 440, cites atalanta as type. 
1840. Westwood, Gen. Syn. 87, cites 10 as type, incorrectly. 


As a result of Scudder’s peculiar reasoning, or through some strange 
oversight, Cynthia has had no place in our nomenclature. It imme- 
diately precedes Vanessa on the same page in Fabricius work, and the 
types as they were originally fixed are congeneric, so that we are forced to 
replace the more common term with it. Pyrameis, type atalanta also 
falls. 


CALLICORE Hbn. Logotype Papilio codomannus Fab. 


1818. Huebner, Verz. bek. Schmett, 41; astarte, clymena. 

1820. Billberg, Enum. Ins. 78; clymena, haplotype of Diaethria, thus fixing 
astarte as type of Callicore. 

1875. Scudder, Hist. Sk. 130, in spite of previous use of this genus for species 
allied to clymena, cites codomannus (astarte) as type, and notes also, 
on P. 1385, that Catagramma falls before it. 


We have sought some genus of which codomannus might have become 
the valid type before 1820 but without success. Such an action would 
constitute a valid fixation of clymena as type of Callicore under Opinion 6 
of the International Rules, and permit its retention in the customary 
usage. As the matter stands, however, it will replace Catagramma, 
which is not represented in our fauna. Diaethria Billberg, type Papilio 
clymena Cram. replaces Callicore. 


CELTIPHAGA nom nov. Type Apatura celtis Bdv. & Lec. New name for Chlorippe 
Auct. 


1922] Barnes and Lindsey: Generic Names in Lepidoptera 93 


Most writers agree on the generic distinctness of the North Amer- 
ican species hitherto referred to Chlorippe or Apatura from the true 
European A patura. Godman and Salvin (Biol. Cent. Am. Rhop. I, 312, 
318) also indicate that they regard the North American species as 
distinct from those properly referable to Apatura, but use Doxocopa 
for the single allied species of Central America. Chlorippe is properly 
applied to a group of species which appear to be congeneric with 
agathina. Whatever application is to be made of these names, Chlorippe 
must fall before Doxocopa, for Scudder cites agathina as the type of 
Chlorip pe in the Historical Sketch, and polyxena as the type of Doxocopa, 
but he had previously (Syst. Rev. 9) cited agathina as type of this genus, 
and this must stand. In the Bulletin of the Buffalo Society of Natural 
Science, Vol. II, p. 248, 1875, the same writer cites laurentia as the 
type of Chlorippe, but this is ultra vires in view of his former action. 
We have been unable to find earlier type fixations for either of the two 
genera, and it has proven equally impossible to find a described genus 
which will apply to celtis and its allies, so that a new name seems 
necessary. 


CALEPHELIS G. & R. Orthotype Papilio caeneus Linn. 


1869. Grote and Robinson, Trans. Am. Ent. Soc. II, 310; caeneus (as 
caeneus) designated type. 


According to Opinion 14 of the International Rules, the type of 
this genus must be ceneus Linn. as specified by Grote and Robinson, 
and not virginiensis, which they erroneously placed as a synonym of 
ceneus, and which has been cited as the type by later writers. We are 
unable to find any other described genus which is applicable, and would 
suggest the anagram LEPHELISCA, type Erycina virginiensis Guer, to 
take the place of Calephelis Auct. 


LYCAENA Fab. Logotype Papilio phlaeas Linn. 

1807. Fabricius, Ill. Mag. VI, 285. Includes Lycaenids of all three 
subfamilies. 

1815. Oken, Lehrb. I, 717, uses for blues and a few other species. 

1824. Curtis, Brit. Ent. Lep. I, 12, cites phlaeas as type. 

1832-3. Swainson, Zool. Ill. (2), III, 132, follows Curtis. 

1840. Westwood, Gen. Syn. 88, also follows Curtis. 

1872. Scudder, 4th Rept. Peab. Acad. 57, also cites phlaeas. 

1875. Id., claims that the citation of phlaeas was ultra vires because of Oken’s 
restriction, and cites endymion as type. Later writers have used it 
for the blues also. 


It is unfortunate that the accustomed use of this genus must be so 
radically changed, but this is inevitable if we follow the International 
Rules, for Oken’s action is not recognized as a valid restriction, and 
Curtis’ specification of phle@as as type was legitimate. It is the earliest 
citation of a type which we have been able to find, and is abundantly 
substantiated by later writers. 

The effect of this change on the names of the subfamilies must also 
be taken up. Since Chrysophanus is a synonym, the subfamily Chry- 
sophanine of the ‘Check List’’ must fall, and logically becomes the 
Lyc#nin&. The blues, formerly the Lycaeninae, must have a new 


94 Annals Entomological Society of America _[Vol. XV, 


name. In the absence of any rules on this point we prefer to take 
Plebejus Linn. as the stem for this name, forming the subfamily PLEBE- 
JIN, rather than follow Van Duzee’s rules and base the name upon the 
genus which replaces Lycena. The family name remains, of course, 
LYCANIDZ. 


Urpanus Hbn. Haplotype Papilio malve Linn. 
1806. Huebner, Teutamen, malve@ sole species and therefore type. 


In view of the change in the application of Hesperia set forth under 
that genus, Urbanus takes the place of Hesperia Auct. 


ERYNNIs Schrank. Logotype Papilio tages Linn. 


1801. Schrank, Fauna Boica II, I, 157. Comma, tages, malve and others. 

1872. Scudder, 4th Rept. Peab. Acad. 71, cites tages as type. 

1875. Id., Hist. Sk. 167, claims that this was ultra vires, and that comma 
became type in 1832. 


Unless a type was cited previous to 1872 this genus must replace 
Thanaos, and we have been unable to find such a citation. 


The removal of Hesperia from this subfamily makes it necessary to 
establish a new name, which must be formed from one of the genera 
just discussed. According to Van Duzee’s suggestions, it should 
become the subfamily URBANINE. Erynnis, the oldest included genus, 
would form the name Erynnine. It seems to us that there is little choice 
in the matter, so we are adopting the former. 


Thymele, hitherto applied by modern writers to a neotropical genus 
allied to Telegonus, will fall before Erynnis, as also will Thanaos. Tages 
was designated as the type of Thymele by Westwood (1840, Gen. Syn. 88) 
and Scudder’s later actions (Hist. Sk. 282) were ultra vires. 


HESPERIA Fab. Logotype Papilio comma Linn. 

1793. Fabricius, Ent. Syst. III, (1), 258, corresponds to Linnaeus’ Papiliones 
plebejt. 

1798. Cuvier, Tabl. Elem. 592, cites only malve in this genus. 

1810. Latreille, Consid. Gen. 440, cites proteus, malve and steropes as 
typese 

1816. Dalman, Vetensk. Akad. Handl. XX XVII, 200, cites comma as type. 

1820-21. Swainson, Zool. Ill., (1), I, 28, cites comma as type. 

1833. Curtis, Brit. Ent. Lep. II, 442, also cites comma. 

1870. Butler, Ent. Mo. Mag. VII, 58, cites exclamationis, erroneously. 

1872. Crotch, Cist. Ent. 1, 62, cites malve as type, giving Cuvier, 1798, as 
his authority. 

1872. Scudder, 4th Rept. Peab. Acad. 73, cites malve@ as type. 

1875. Id., Hist. Sk. 187, does same. 


We have not been able to examine Cuvier’s Tableau Elementaire, 
but in 1832 (An. Kingdom XV, 594, footnote) he refers to Fabricius’ 
Ent. Syst. for ‘‘the other species,” after citing malveé as sole example of 
Hesperia. This is rather conclusive evidence that there was no inten- 
tion to restrict in the mind of Cuvier, even though his action in 1798 
were admissible as a restriction. Aside from this we find nothing on 
which to base the prevalent use of malve@ as type, and it seems that the 
genus properly applies to the species now placed in Pamphila. West- 
wood, in 1840, (Gen. Syn. 88) cited comma as the type of Pamphila so 


1922] Barnes and Lindsey: Generic Names in Lepidoptera 95 


that it is synonymous with Hesperia. This necessitates changing the 
name of the subfamily Pamphiline to Hesperu#. As 1n the case of 
the Lycenide, we feel that it is both unnecessary and inadvisable to 
change the name of the family, as has been done by Hampson (Novy. 
Zool. XXV, 386). 


SPHINGID#. 


PHLEGETHONTIUS Hbn. Logotype Sphinx sexta Joh. 


1820. Huebner, Verz. bek. Schmett, 140, cluentius, carolina and others. 

1892. Kirby, Cat. Lep. Het. I, 688, cites sexta (carolina) as type. 

1903. Rothschild and Jordan, Rev. Sphing. I, 52, cite cluentius as type and 
place the name under Cocytius. 


Kirby’s appears to be the first type fixation, and will re-establish 
the use of this genus for the species now listed under Protoparce. 


ATREIDES Holland, new name for Atreus Grt., type Sphinx plebeja Fab., pre- 
occupied in Arachnida. 


1903. Holland Moth Book 49, calls attention to the incorrect use of Atreus by 
Rothschild and Jordan and proposes the new name, which has since 
been overlooked. 

Hytoicus Hbn. Logotype Sphinx pinastri, Linn. 


1820. Huebner, Verz. bek. Schmett. 138, pinastri and others. 
1873. Grote, Bull. Buff. Soc. Nat. Sci. I. 27, cites pinastri as type. 


Takes the place of Sphinx, which has been incorrectly used as 
explained under that genus. 


Puryxus Hbn. Logotype Sphinx caicus Cram. 
1820. Huebner, Verz. bek. Schmett, 137; livornica (lineata) and caicus. 
1892. Kirby, Cat. Lep. Het. I, 697, cites caicus as type. 
1903. Rothschild and Jordan, Rey. Sphing. II, 7138, cite lineata, following 
the first species principle. 
Grammodia R. & J. Orthotype Sphinx caicus Cram. 
1903. Rothschild and Jordan, Rev. Sphing. I. 371; caicus designated 
type. 


This matter needs no further explanation. 


CALLIOMMA Wlk. Logotype Sphinx parce Fab. 


1856. Walker, List. Lep. Ins. B. M. VIII, 108, nomius, licastus and others. 

1892. Kirby, Cat. Lep. Het. 646, cites licastus as type. This species, accord- 
ing to R. & J., is synonymous with parce Fab. 

1903. Rothschild and Jordan, Rev. Sphing. I, 387, cite nomius as type. 


Rothschild and Jordan use Hemeroplanes Hbn. for parce, citing pan 
as type. Kirby in 1892, however, designated triptolemus as type of 
this genus, so that it replaces Leucorhampha R. & J., dropping out of 
our fauna, and is itself replaced by Calliomma. 


Hemaris Dalman. Orthotype Sphinx fuciformis Linn. 
1816. Dalman Vet. Akad. Handl. XX XVII, 207, fuciformis designated type. 
Haemorrhagia G.& R. Logotype Sesia thysbe Fab. 


1865. Grote and Robinson, Proc. Ent. Soc. Phil. V, 149; gracilis, ruficaudis, 
thysbe, fuscicaudis. 
1873. Grote, Bull. Buff. Soc. Nat. Sci. I, 18, cites thysbe as type. 


96 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


We find it utterly impossible to agree with the reasoning of Roths- 
child and Jordan (Rev. Sphing, I, 488) regarding Hemaris. Opinion 10 
of the International Rules deals with just such cases, and permits the 

use of Hemaris in place of Hemorrhagia. 


SPHINX Linn. Logotype Sphinx euphorbie Linn. 
1758. Linnaeus. Syst. Nat. Ed. X, 489, includes all hawk-moths. 
1810. Latreille, Consid. Gen. 440, cites euphorbie as type. 
1820-21. Swainson, Zool. Ill. (1), II, 81, cites convolvuli as type. 
1828. Curtis, Brit. Ent. Lep. I, 195, cites Iigustri as type. 
1873. Grote, Bull. Buff. Soc. Nat. Sci. I, 25, follows Curtis. 
1892. Kirby, Cat. Lep. Het. I, 692, also designates ligustrt. 
1903. Rothschild and Jordan, Rev. Sphing. I, 318, cite ocellata. 
1917. Barnes and McDunnough, Check List 24, apply to species now placed 
in Hyloicus, without any explanation. 


Latreille’s fixation, in spite of the fact that it does not agree with 
subsequent usage, must be regarded as the first valid type fixation. 
With euphorbie as type the genus takes the place of Celerio, type 
Sphinx gallit Roth. 


SATURNIID. 


SAMIA Hbn. Logotype Phalaena cynthia Dru. 
1820. Huebner, Verz. bek. Schmett. 156, cynthia, cecropia, promethea. 
1855.. Walker, List. Lep. Ins. B. M. V, 1222, uses for cecropia, promethea, 
and others. 
1865. Grote, Proc. Soc. Phil. V, 228, cites cynthia as type. 
1874. Id; Proc. Am. Phil. Soc. XIV, 258, under Philosamia, mentions Walker’s 
use of the genus and cites cecropia as type. 
1886. Smith, Proc. U. S. N. M. IX, 416, uses for cynthia alone. - 
1892. Kirby, Cat. Lep. Het. I, 750, cites cecropia as type. 
Philosamia Grt. Logotype Phalaena cynthia Dru. 


1874. Grote, Proc. Am. Phil. Soc. XIV, 258, cynthia designated type. 
1892. Kirby, Cat. Lep. Het. I, 748, cites walkeri as type. 
1912. Packard, Mon. Bomb. Moths. N. A. III, 239. 


Walker’s action in 1855 was in no sense a restriction so far as the 
selection of a type is concerned, and Grote’s first designation of cynthia 
is therefore valid and his later action in specifying cecropia as type 
ultra vires. In Packard’s Monograph Philosamia is used for cynthia and 
allied species, with Samia quoted in synonymy. Under Samia, used 
for cecropia and allies, the references are by the editors, so it would 
seem that Packard recognized the use we make of the genus as correct. 


PLATYSAMIA Grt. Logotype Bombyx cecropia Linn. 


1865. Grote, Proc. Ent. Soc. Phil. V, 228; cecropia, columbia, californica. 

1874. Id., Proc. Am. Ent. Phil. Soc. XIV, 258, under Philosamia, says that 
this genus should fall before Samia. 

1912. Cockerell, in Packard’s Mon. Bomb. Moths N. A. III, 211, follows 
Grote’s action of 1874. 


It seems that no type has ever been specified for Platysamia, so we 
select cecropia. The three species originally included are congeneric, 
so there can be no mistaken application of the genus, which takes the 
place of Samia as commonly used. 


1922] Barnes and Lindsey: Generic Names in Lepidoptera 97 


Actias Leach. Logotype Phalaena luna Linn. 
1815. Leach, Zool. Misc., II, 25; luna and selene. 
1874. Grote, Proc. Am. Phil. Soc. XIV, 257, cites luna as type. 
1892. Kirby, Cat. Lep. Het. I, 766, cites selene as type. 
1912. Packard, Mon. Bomb. Moths N. A. III, 181, uses for selene. 
Tropaea Hbn. Logotype Echidna caudata selene Hbn. 


1820. Huebner, Verz. bek. Schmett. 152; luna, selene. 
1864. Packard, Proc. Ent. Soc. Phil. III, 379, uses for luna, but cites no 


type. 
1892. Kirby, Cat. Lep. Het. I. 765, separates from Actias, but cites no type. 


Plectropteron Hutt. Haplotype Echidna caudata selene Hbn. 


1864. Hutton, Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. XVII, 60; diane (syn. of selene) sole 
species and therefore type. 


These three genera offer a nice problem in type fixation. When 
selene became type of Plectropteron in 1846, the types of one or both of 
the other two genera were automatically fixed as luna. A possible 
solution is that /una became the type of Actias, since that genus takes 
priority over Tropea, and that either species could then be selected as 
type of Tropea. Since Grote later cited una as the type of Actias, 
everything favors this fixation. If it be thought desirable to separate 
selene and luna generically, the selection of a type for Tropea becomes 
of some importance. We have been unable to find any type specified, 
so we designate selene in order that the earlier names may stand. 
Hampson, Rothschild and other writers regard selene and luna as 
congeneric, in which we follow them. 


CERATOCAMPID. 


Eactes Hbn. Logotype Attacus imperialis Dru. 


1820. Huebner, Verz. bek. Schmett. 153; imperatoria and others. 
1874. Grote, Proc. Am. Phil. Soc. XIV, 260, cites imperialis (imperatoria) as 


type. 

We are unable to find any previous type fixation, and the name is 
not preoccupied, hence there appears to be no reason why it should not 
apply to the species now listed in Basilona. We are unable to find any 
designation of a type for the latter genus, and take this opportunity 
to suggest cacicus, which is congeneric with imperialis, as also is the 
remaining species, ducalis, according to Packard. 


SYNTOMIDZ. 


PseupomyaA Hbn. Logotype Glaucopis tipulina Hbn. 


1820. Huebner, Verz. bek. Schmett. 124; melanthus, tipulina, temenus, eacus. 
1892. Kirby, Cat. Lep. Het. I. 138, cites tipulina as type. 
1898. Hampson, Cat. Lep. Phal. B. M. I, 262, cites melanthus as type. 


Owing to Kirby’s designation of tipulina, this genus will replace 
Saurita in Hampson’s Catalogue, and is not represented in our fauna. 
Its place is taken by 


PsEupocuHaris Druce. Orthotype P. naenia Druce. 
1884. Druce, Biol. Cent. Am., Lep. Het. I, 56, P. naenia designated type. 


98 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


ARCTIID. 


Noline. 


RoESELIA Hbn. Logotype Tinea cucullatella Linn. 


1826. Huebner, Verz. bek. Schmett. 397; togatulana, cucullatella and others. 
1874. Grote, Bull. Buff. Soc. Nat. Sci. II, 152, cites cucullatella as type. 
1900. Hampson, Cat. Lep. Phal. B. M. II, 51, cites togatulalis as type. 


We find no objection to Grote’s fixation of cucullatella as type, and 
therefore sink this genus to Nola. The next available name for the 
species allied to togatulalis is Sarbena Wlk., Jn. Linn. Soc., Zool. VI, 
137, 1862. We have not been able to consult the original description, 
but have found no type fixations to conflict with that of Hampson, ' 
who designates S. lignifera Wlk. and makes the name a synonym of 
Reselia. 


LITHOSIINA. 


EupesmiA Hbn. Haplotype E. ruficollis Hbn. 


1824? Huebner. Samml. exot. Schmett. II, pl. 400; ruficollis sole species 
and therefore type. 


This genus should be used for the North American species now 
listed under Cisthene. 


CISTHENE Wlk. Logotype C. subjecta Wik. 


1854. Walker, List. Lep. Ins. B. M. II, 533; trisigna, subjecta. 

1874. Grote, Bull. Buff. Soc. Nat. Sci. II, 151, cites subjecta as type. 
1892. Kirby, Cat. Lep. Het. I, 288, follows Grote. 

1900. Hampson, Cat. Lep. Phal. B. M. II, 243, cites trisigna as type. 


There is nothing contrary to the International Rules in Grote’s 
action in 1874, so we restore Cisthene to its former place, with Illice 
in Synonymy. 


HAEMATOMIS Hamps., 1900, Cat. Lep. Phal. B. M. II, 514. 


This name was spelled Haematomonis in the Check List (p. 31), but 
neither in Hampson’s text nor index does it appear in that form. 


ARCTIINZA 


PHAEGOPTERA, H. S. Logotype P. histrionica H. S. 
1853. Herrich-Schaeffer, Ausser. Schmett. 78, ff. 58-68; histrionica and 
other species. 
1892. Kirby, Cat. Lep. Het. I, 212, cites histrionica as type. 
Phegoptera H.S. 
1853. Herrich-Schaeffer, op. cit. 16; no species mentioned. 


Hampson (Cat. Lep. Phal. B. M. III, 117) discards Phegoptera H. S. 
as an undescribed genus and does not mention Phegoptera. The two 
names were doubtless intended to be the same, but the latter alone is 
valid. It takes the place of Opharus Wlk., type procrotdes (sole sp.). 


1922] Barnes and Lindsey: Generic Names in Lepidoptera 99 


PaRASEMIA Hbn. Logotype Bombyx festiva Bock. 


1822. Huebner, Verz. Bek. Schmett. 181, plantaginis and lapponica (festiva). 

1828. Stephens, Ill. Brit. Ent., Haust. II, 72, used plantaginis as the sole 
species for his new genus Nemeophila, thus fixing the type of Parasemia 
as festiva. 

1892. Kirby, Cat. Lep. Het. I, 250, cites plantaginis as type. 

1901. Hampson, Cat. Lep. Phal. B. M. III, 458, cite plantaginis also. 


This case is covered by Opinion 6 of the International Rules. With 
festiva as type Parasemia supersedes Hyphoraia Huebner, type testudi- 
naria Four. 


NEMEOPHILA Stephens. Haplotype Bombyx plantaginis Linn. 


1828. Stephens, Ill. Brit. Ent. Haust. II, 72; plantaginis sole species. Nemeo- 
phila replaces Parasemia for reasons stated under that genus. 


AGARISTIDZ VS. PHALZNOIDID. 


Hampson’s contention that Phalenoides should be the type genus of 
this family finds no support in the International Rules, which are 
disagreeably lacking on the point, and it conflicts directly with Van 
Duzee’s recommendations. Since Agarista does not fall before Phale- 
noides we prefer to retain the older name, A garistide. 


PROCEEDINGS OF THE SIXTEENTH ANNUAL MEETING 
ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA. 


Toronto, Ontario, December 27 and 28, 1921. 


The opening session of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting was called to 
order at 10:30 A. M., December 27, 1921, in Room 32 of the Engineering 
Building of the University of Toronto, by the President, Dr. J. M. 
Aldrich. The attendance was about 50, increasing to 120 during the 
session. 


The following papers were presented: 


A Study of the Wax-secreting Glands of Pseudococcus citri. ROBERT MATHESON, 
Cornell University. 

The Segmental Unit of the Insectean Tracheal System. CLARENCE H. KEN- 
NEDY, Ohio State University. 

The Wing Venation of the Coleoptera. WittiAM T. M. Forses, Cornell 
University. 

On the Ovipositor of Certain Anthomyian Genera. H. C. HucKert, Cornell 
University. 

Indexing Homopterous Literature. Z. P. Metcatr, North Carolina State 
College. 

The Reputed Vesicating Properties of the Granary Weevil. Wm. A. RILEY 
and FLORENCE DEFIEL, University of Minnesota. 

The Puss Caterpillar (Megalopyge opercularis) and the Effects of Its Stings on 
Man. F. C. BisHorp, United States Bureau of Entomology. 

A Case of Serious Injury by the Bite of the House Centipede. C. L. METcatr, 
University of Illinois. 

Some Cases of Subcutaneous and Intestinal Myiasis. E. M. WALKER, Univer- 
sity of Toronto. 


President Aldrich appointed the following Committees: 
Auditing Committee: S. J. Hunter, C. H. Turner, NorMAN 
CRIDDLE. 


Committee on Resolutions: E. M. Duporte, H. C. Hucxert, W. P. 
FLINT. 


Nominating Committee: R. L. WEBSTER, H. B. HUNGERForD, R. W. 
HARNED. 


100 


1922] Metcalf: Proceedings of Toronto Meeting 101 


The President called attention to the Entomological Exhibit held in 
an adjoining room, composed as follows: 


A Mantid with an Extra Leg-like Appendage. Puitip P. CALVERT, University 
of Pennsylvania. 


The Tracheal System of the Lestes (Odonata) Naiad. CLARENCE H. KENNEDY, 
Ohio State University. 


The Wing-Venation of the Coleoptera. Wiitam T. M. Forses, Cornell 
University. 


The Ox-Warbles and their Effects on Cattle. F.C. BisHopp, United States 
Bureau of Entomology. 


Adjournment. 


SECOND SESSION. 


A Joint Session with the Ecological Society of America was held in 
Room 32 of the Engineering Building on Tuesday, December 27, and 
was called to order at 2:00 P. M. under the Presidency of Dr. Stephen 
A. Forbes of the Ecological Society and Dr. J. M. Aldrich, of the Ento- 
mological Society. The attendance was from 120 to 150. 

The following program was presented: 

The Application of the Principles of Ecology to Practical Problems in Zoology 
and Entomology. V. E. SHELFORD, University of Illinois. 

Hacker’s Proposed New Method for Studying Distribution of Species. PHILIP 
P. CALVERT, University of Pennsylvania. 

The Reciprocal Relations of Insects and Soil. James W. McCuLtocu, Kansas 
State Agricultural College. 

Some Observations on the Influence of Soil Temperature on White Grub 
Activities. James W. McCuttocu, Kansas State Agricultural College. 

A Curious Relation Between a Midge and Mayfly. P. W. CLAAssEN, Cornell 
University. 

Glandular Structure of the Abdominal Appendages of a Termite Guest. 
(Spirachtha). N. E. McInpoo, U. S. Bureau of Entomology. 

A Week-end with Odynerus dorsalis. C. H. TuRNER, St. Louis, Missouri. 

Are Insect Galls ‘‘Deformities’’ and ‘‘Abnormalities?’”’ B. W. WeELLs, North 
Carolina State College. 

The Life History of Nomophila noctuella in Illinois. W. P. FLrn7, Illinois State 
Natural History Survey. 

Observations on the Life History, Habits and Work of the Sorghum Worm 
(Celoma sorghiella Riley). L. HASEMAN, University of Missouri. 

Life History of Crambus laqueatellus. GEORGE G. AINSLIE, U. 5. Bureau of 
Entomology. 

New Mosquito Records and Notes on the Habits of Certain Species from 
Central New York. Ropert MATHESON and R. C. SHANNON, Cornell University. 


102 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


BUSINESS SESSION. 


The third session of the meeting (for the transaction of business) 
was held in Room 10 of the Medical Building on the forenoon of Decem- 
ber 28 with an attendance of about 55. 


The Report of the Executive Committee was made by the Secretary 
as follows: 


REPORT OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE. 


The only matter that was referred to the Executive Committee in the interim 
between annual meetings was the selection of Dr. Seymour Hadwen of the United 
States Biological Survey to give the Annual Address. 


The Executive Committee met at 10:00 P. M., December 27th, in Convocation 
Hall, with the following members present: J. M. Aldrich, Arthur Gibson, C. L. 
Metcalf, Herbert Osborn, E.. M. Walker; W. A. Riley, O. A. Johannsen. 


Dr. W. M. Wheeler and Dr. E. M. Walker were elected members of the Edi- 
torial Board to succeed themselves and Frederick C. Muir to succeed Mr. J. G. 
Sanders, these terms to expire in 1924. 


As committeemen on the Thomas Say Foundation, Mr. Wm. T. Davis was 
re-elected and Mr. Arthur Gibson was elected to succeed Dr. C. Gordon Hewitt, 
these terms to expire in 1924. 


The following were elected Fellows of the Society: Dr. S. J. HUNTER, Uni- 
versity of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas; and Dr. J. M. Swatne, Department of 
Agriculture, Ottawa, Canada. 


The following were elected members of the Society: 


Wo. J. BAERG, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York. 

Fioyp J. BRINLEY, Box 69, Riverton, New Jersey. 

QUINTA CATTELL, Garrison-on-Hudson, New York. 

STEWART C. CHANDLER, 402 W. Walnut Street, Carbondale, Illinois. 

WALLACE CoLMAN, 708 E. Seneca Street, Ithaca, New York. 

CHARLES C. Compton, Box 12, Aurora, Illinois. 

ANGELO M. Costa-Lima, Rua do Ouvidor, No. 116, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 

RaAyMOND B. Cow es, 409 Dryden Road, Ithaca, New York. 

EUGENE M. CRAIGHEAD, Bureau of Plant Industry, Harrisburg, Pa. 

CLIFFORD R. CurTriGHT, Botany and Zoology Building, Ohio State University, 
Columbus, Ohio. 

NorMA Forp, 96 Dunn Ave., Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 

Lioyp VICTOR FRANCE, University Farm, St. Paul, Minnesota. 

Paut M. GILMER, 21 Nourse Street, St. Paul, Minnesota. 

Henry G. Goon, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York. 

Fay Erastus Guyton, Box 411, Alabama Polytechnic Institute, Auburn, 
Alabama. | 

LAWRENCE LESTER HuBER, Dept. of Zoology and Entomology, Ohio State 
University, Columbus, Ohio. 

Harotp C. HAttock, 504 South Aurora St., Ithaca, New York. 


1922] Metcalf: Proceedings of Toronto Meeting 103 


ALBERT HARTZELL, Dept. of Zoology and Entomology, Iowa State College, 
Ames, Iowa. 

Rospert D. Harwoop, Jacksonville, Illinois. 

SADIE E. KEEN, Drawer J, Forest Grove, Oregon. 

Jerome McNEIL, Box 55, Thonotosassa, Florida. 

Epitu W. Mank, 12 Reservoir Street, Lawrence, Mass. 

HELEN G. MANK, 12 Reservoir Street, Lawrence, Mass. 

ARTHUR C. Mason, U. S. Dept. of Agr., Box 491, Orlando, Florida. 

Aucust E. Miter, Dept. of Zoology and Entomology, Ohio State University, 
Columbus, Ohio. 

THEODORE B. MITCHELL, 221 W. Oregon Street, Raleigh, N. Carolina. 

EvizaBetH Marriott Morratt, 335 W. Wesley Street, Wheaton, III. 

THEUNIS JOHANNES NAUDE, 1620 Neil Ave., Columbus, Ohio. 

CLaup R. NEISWANDER, 17 W. Norwich Ave., Columbus, Ohio. 

Ernest NIELSEN, care of C. E. Olsen, Box 72, West Nyack, New York. 

E. F. Puriies, Bureau of Entomology, Washington, D. C. 

Jowannes T. PotGIeTER, 1620 Neil Ave., Columbus, Ohio. 

THERON PALMER Remy, Box 225, College Station, Texas. 

R. R. Row.ey, Louisiana, Missouri. 

Rosert D. SPENCER, State Hospital, Ashland, Pa. 

Or1N A. STEVENS, Agricultural College, North Dakota. 

GerorGiA SwEET, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 

FREEMAN R. Swirt, Corcoran Manor, Mt. Vernon, N. Y. 

Ryoicut TAKAHASHI, Agricultural Experiment Station, Taihoku, Formosa, 
Japan. 

A. C. Tuomas, Bustleton, Pa. 

Myron T. TownsEnD, 301 Nat. History Building, University of Illinois, 
Urbana, Illinois. 

Francis M. WADLEY, 126 S. Minneapolis Ave., Wichita, Kansas. 

Morris N. Watt, St. John’s Hill, Wanganui, New Zealand. 

WaLteR H. WELLHOUSE, Dept. Zoology and Entomology, Iowa State College, 
Ames, Iowa. 

LuTHER S. West, Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, 
New York. 

GRACE WILEY, Chanute, Kansas. 

Hans Zerny, Natural History Museum, Vienna 1, Burgring 7, Austria. 


Total new members, 47. 


The Executive Committee directed the Secretary to credit the current 
account finally with the interest collected from permanent funds during 1920 and 
1921, an amount totaling $34.77, which has been carried tentatively in the current 
fund but credited also to the permanent fund. The permanent fund is therefore 
debited this amount from the total given in the treasurer’s report below. 


At the request of the Managing Editor of the ANNALS, Dr. C. H. Kennedy 
was appointed Assistant Managing Editor. 


104 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


The report of the Secretary was presented as follows: 


REPORT OF THE SECRETARY. 


At the Chicago meeting of the Society a new Secretary-Treasurer was elected, 
necessitating the removal of the office and accounts from Washington to Columbus. 
This Secretary-Treasurer subsequently moved from Columbus to Urbana, again 
necessitating a change of address, the transfer of accounts, etc. The Secretary 
begs the indulgence of members for any inconvenience or annoyance that may 
have arisen from this incertis sedis of their official and trusts he may be able to 
manage the affairs entrusted to him in a much more efficient manner another year. 


That the Society is in a healthy condition is evidenced in several ways. The 
number of titles on the program for the present session is more than twice the 
average number of papers presented for the past ten years. There are this year 
fifty titles including the annual address. The largest previous number the Sec- 
retary could find listed was thirty titles for the year 1913. 


‘The membership including the newly elected members is 606. The correspond- 
ing figures for the past ten years are: 


1911—391 1916—611 
1912—410 1917—606 
1913—439 1918—594 
1914—551 1919—601 
1915—578 1920—567 


Financially it may be said that the total receipts for the year are in excess 
of those of any year in our history. Even after subtracting the large balance 
remaining from last year, the income during the year is within a few dollars of the 
largest amount ever received by the treasury in a single year (1917). The large 
balance of 1920 was due to two causes: first, the unusual number of issues of the 
ANNALS that were not paid for when the books were closed; and, secondly, the 
unusual number of members (281) who had paid in advance for the following year, 
both factors operating to reduce our balance this year. Due to the greater cost 
of printing, engraving, clerical help, etc., the expenses of the Society have been 
very high. Five issues of the ANNALS were paid for during the year, this bill alone 
amounting to $1,854.31. We still owe printing and engraving bills totalling $80.25, 
and for the entire fourteenth volume of the ANNALS. Estimating the cost of this 
1921 volume at approximately the same as that for 1920 it will be seen that the 
balance in the current fund is about $350 short of our liabilities. In this connec- 
tion it is well to keep in mind that our present balance includes about $450 of dues 
already paid for 1922 and subsequent years. The amount that may be expected 
from the dues of members during the coming year for the coming year, hardly 
exceeds $750. Of course, the Society has the permanent fund ($840.00) which 
would more than meet our liabilities. The Secretary does not wish to imply that 
we are in an unusual financial condition, but wishes the members to be informed 
that we are practically running behind a year, to cover which liability we have 
the permanent fund. 

In spite of the evidences of health and prosperity of the Society the Secretary 
does not believe that we are living up to our full opportunity for service to Ento- 
mology in America. The membership is not what it should be by at least two or 


1922] Metcalf: Proceedings of Toronto Meeting 105 


three hundred members. Between annual meetings the only realization most of 
“us have of any connection with the Entomological Society of America is the 
quarterly receipt of the ANNALS and an occasional statement of annual dues from 
the Secretary. The ANNALS is a credit to our Society and the annual program is 
always a splendid one. But surely there must be other ways in which an organ- 
ization of approximately 600 persons, all vitally interested in one profession, 
should, and can, make itself felt during the year. 


As a step in preparation for any larger service that the Society may deem 
it expedient to undertake, the Secretary has taken the initiative in preparing 
blank, index, information cards, which were mailed to all members with the 
preliminary announcement of this meeting. The annual statement of dues appears 
on one side; on the reverse the secretary asked for the following information: 
(1) full name and correct address; (2) official title, firm or other institution with 
which the member is connected; (3) the subject in which the member has pub- 
lished papers; (4) projects on which the member has work in progress; (5) tax- 
onomic groups in which the member is interested and in which he is willing to 
make determinations; (6) and, finally, the degrees held by the member. There is 
also space provided for a record of the date of recommendation to membership, 
date of election as a member, as a fellow, and as an honorary fellow, and for a 
record of memberships terminated by death, by resignation or failure to pay the 
annual dues. 


These cards should serve several purposes. They will serve as the official 
mailing list of the Secretary’s office. The very roving nature of most Entomologists 
makes it impracticable to keep the members revised address on the same sheet 
with his financial statement; since the latter must be permanently filed and in a 
few years becomes so checkered with alterations and revisions of the address as 
to be unreadable. With the card system a new card may be filed with each 
change of address and the old one discarded. 


If the members will fill out the cards faithfully they will serve as a splendid 
basis for selection of persons for symposia, public addresses, etc. And if the 
Society desires to make use of the Secretary’s office in such a way, they would 
furnish a basis for helping amateurs who desire identification in various groups, for 
bringing together specialists working on similar problems and as an indication of 
members who might be available to undertake a particular type of work. 


Unhappily in spite of the admonition ‘‘See the other side’’ that appears at the 
bottom of the card, many members have apparently noticed only the statement of 
their account and have failed to see the information blank on the reverse side of the 
card. Others have for various reasons probably been reluctant to fill in the card. 
The Secretary has no desire to press the matter but is firmly convinced in his own 
mind that his office will be able to serve the Society better if the information asked 
for appears beneath your name and address. A supply of these cards is available 
if members who have not sent them in, care to fill them out. 


Some of the avowed objects of the Society, as expressed in the constitution 
and at other times, are: to promote the Science of Entomology in all its branches; 
to keep amateurs in touch with professional entomologists and with a central body; 
to build up and foster local societies; and to give the study of entomology that 
standing which its importance in relation to all forms of human activity warrants 
and demands. 


106 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


Let us ask ourselves seriously whether as a society we are living up to the high 
ideals avowed at the foundation of our organization. The Secretary would like 
to see some of the splendid enthusiasm and active zeal evinced during the convo- 
cation week pervade the membership of our organization during the other fifty-one 
weeks of the year so that the Society may make itself felt as a power for the 
advancement of Entomology as a profession, and will welcome suggestions from 
any member of ways in which he may serve to this end. 


At the Baltimore meeting of the Society in 1918 a motion was passed that 
each annual program should have one session devoted to a symposiurn on some 
general entomological topic. The Executive Committee has not provided a sym- 
posium this year, for two reasons. Because of the loss of Monday from our usual 
convocation week and because of the demand for two joint sessions it appeared 
that the time for the reading of papers was likely to be curtailed. Especially after 
it was found advisable to schedule the public address during one of the day-time 
sessions, it was evident that no time was available for a symposium. Again the 
officers did not know what to suggest for a symposium or whom to ask to take this. 
part of the program. 


What do the members desire shall be done about a symposium? If a sym- 
posium is to be held (and the Secretary is heartily in favor of the idea) what 
subjects will the members like to hear discussed? The index cards of members 
should be of great aid in the arrangements for such a symposium because they 
will indicate the major interests of the members. If you vote to continue the 
symposium (and I hope you will) please let me beg of you not to refuse to take part 
in the discussion if you are asked to do so. The Secretary believes that the subject 
for the symposium should be selected annually one year in advance by vote of 
the members at the annual meeting from subjects nominated through the Secre- 
tary or Executive Committee. 


The Executive Committee has learned with sorrow of the death of our Hon- 
orary Fellow, Professor Charles Henry Fernald, on February 22, 1921, and of 
the following members: Edward G. Love in 1919, and Dr. William A. Nason, date 
unknown. Total—s. 


The following members have resigned and their membership is hereby 
terminated: John Wendell Bailey, Myron H. Swenk, B. P. Young, Philip A. Munz, 
Daniel M. Brumfiel. Total—5. 


Twenty-six members whose dues are unpaid for more than the alloted two 
years and who have been notified of the rule are retained for the present until 
they have had one more opportunity to remain in good standing. Such delinquent 
members cost the Society practically nothing since the ANNALS is not sent to 
them. Total losses in membership—8. 


Forty-seven members and two fellows were elected by the Executive Com- 
mittee on December 27, 1921. 


The actual membership reported December 21, 1920 (See Annals, Vol. XIV. 


PAV WaSes ake d lacs Sako eee a ee ee eee aes Aeros 567 
New members! 1021 ck 3. ve fe ae ee Pee ere cat ee eee 47 
Loss of Members 1921. 32.4, Gcieter cits hte eee eee 
Niet; Gain 1921 ccc ek ee hae, trea eebtp aie eke ec a ee ee Se eee — 39 


1922] Metcalf: Proceedings of Toronto Meeting 107 


On December 24th, when the records for 1921 were closed the membership 
of the Society was in the following condition with respect to the payment of dues: 


Memiberstandshellows patedshor O24 ee Bs iii ts Sarefcieleeserer= tied 0% is oe. ive wis oye thea 1 
MembenseandemellowsspalG ton O2amaa ye: 2 os « tease wiclselc clouas a7 ota lofays erste oops sera 3 
Iienibersrancdeabellows: patceror ll O22 ee asiicrais apices cies scsi isies wtieee on ot ee 222 
IMembenccandebellowsspaictarplO2 Ik sae.) rs, «sudedstensyticnehels. csi o's ejais)s 2s 21s te slo s 219 
Memperssandenellowsmot-parditorl O21 Ss .).. crysis ditiene sre fs «sis are mous ane chanel sai 52 
Members.and Fellows not paid for 1920 and 1921................ 0000000. cee. 18 
Members and Fellows not paid for 1919, 1920 and 1921.....................4.. 26 
INeay IMUGiaal serrel Fs as ee eho ote bod tte pe eaters <6 Colon batts AMA on ain ee se ieee 47 
ILaligs IMileraal oer Sys Basie ee ore sec cre esac ae RC IERTERE © co: Cit Ch CREE Big on ae a 13 
TRIG ng sawn Piel JON eS ey edt Sac ce hier ne ORO ere 8 Orc Pe sir Pen ae aaa 5 

ANG uN Wilesanl oyeves chjo)s& 6 Bes perea occ Geom tateoc o> hice Siinne ae an ReaD rE Ee 606 


One life membership was received during the year from Mr. W. M. Giffard. 
Respectfully submitted, 
C. L. METcatr, Secretary. 


The report of the Treasurer was next presented: 


TREASURER’S REPORT. 
(December 24, 1921) 


CURRENT FUNDS. 


Recetpts. 
Balance, December 21, 1920 (See Annals, Vol. XIV, p. 41).............. $1.681.64 
romeArinial eo wesiote Wiembersiace weer aes le crete en eles sieve) are cles ouele suc cle 890.53 
BromMVlanacine= ditonor thevAnnalSiiac.. cesses. cecetae ce oeemeseem ses 787 .86 
Oe gE DN ER ELSItpik a Ae Rh ere ecto cneec Spalsyere: ¢ stousiere Peed eevee abéoelbiare aioe 6 50.00 
IFTITESE, osig ol hd Ose Oe Se ro DIC OO ntrerco Rice acc ies aan ee eee 29.91 
1D a(S) AEN OTETS Oa ohh ane 6 ha det Oe Or8 OOD HReI ONG oD CES REED irene bec COE eRe Creo 24 
Cheek rerused. by Dati, tar DalanGe, -aiscjsgere ic ares- > cpitciars atesc.2 s eiee Os wore as 7s 6.00 
$3,446.18 
Expenditures. 

Annalsom December vl OUOe asm tater ser delae,s +. ceteris cteiemicrs siogisve. seers $ 345.75 
Min pl Seton Wc nehimeL OD OMe ae marcia ic cee cher sverdarcteve se s+ Cepmnrsuorejauspecsicve «eyslebecs erccet 406.00 
Nero rioke |S OPN eoaccc Gp oor Oe taUn b EDC e i EOI © Coie > Man ee pon ener 413.50 
NTIN AIS LOLISEPUCMDEI LOZO na eerie act eee &.\ti cis » «oueeeier ais, seimiefeleje: oisl'oc)8 6/006 298 .50 
AnnialsronmeD eeenab ery LOZO eS spats crac) reruns bs. ohsss aMenesavereretet ovate chats ef vinje\choye's SPAS 
iRostagembimvyelOpesmetce mom Annals aes)" cuaycis <i » <tetehedere pheiev elite l= gis -lernierej set 62.81 
J DyaePa Nae ope VAwaT IS. PN te Or 5 Se RA eon SRO Eee: 0 cic On Colon TamiCem Inert 221.86 
Suampsrancesbatm pecdweMmvelOpeSen cracic cccrejereses)« ~ « -Vefeletelayeieicisiesshe.«tehe ior siaie sie 24.79 
Clercaland otenozraphiceAssistance. oc js... ss. sdeidees ccs eccee sees ae 34.10 
EG Ieei tHe Pere ee a em a eye, Wats tel oie si « ABER ai eoh Goats are ree Nala 115.88 
POSES sje Peso ees Ne Cte a et Oe ee cS ee 11.97 
LEDGE ECS ya SG Re Ce cn Ieee an eR 8 ee ee 6.09 
IDGOINEHTERE. 335 dnd bd edo ASD PU OCE LEO DE OIG COS IGIOG co coe ard Mer aerrace asian 1.78 
ANGI SSRI | Gel ot Sola B CeO OB bee ORL OIE Dap EEE. OC Urea Hick amit arr a 18 
Date ye DW SpoOsiM Box ONe=MaAllpyCALs seicveyeelag sieves! s+ sdekttelelocsi sicvelels ©) shes slaverste 1.50 
C@hecleceiusedibygbanks) Tosbalancetiacaccisenis «sic - hepeleyasi-cerels «cj epeiaye serene 6.00 

Cash on deposit, First National Bank, Champaign, I1l., December 24, 
Oh GeoB Soe 1e 0 Ce SE ROS Oe te SE Oo Dee. C5 Rob CDE 1,167.12 


$3,446.18 


108 Annals Entomological Society of America  [Vol. XV, 


LIABILITIES. 


The Society owes the publishers of the ANNaALs for the four issues of 1921. 
Also for engravings for December, 1921, ANNALS, $56.25. Also for printing the 
program, $24.00. 


CONDITION OF PERMANENT FUNDS. 


On hand Jast,ceport (Annals, Vol. SenVis pe Alot es ee ee a eee ee $795.09 
Appreciation/of nine War sails obaimpss enn cies <i elie, crelen tas emicie seieinre 1.08 
One life Membership, W. M. Giffard, carried in current account...... Bela? 50.00 
rom), interest on bonds, in currenteaAccOunibaans: y-lsis anette erie ee 29.91 
$876.08 

Less interest accrued during 1920 and 1921, now vested in the current fund.. 34.77 
Metual; presentt balance :..o- seen ce he ane ee ae ea eee eee $841.31 

SECURITIES. 


The securities held remain exactly as recorded in the Treasurer’s report for 
last year (See ANNALS, Vol. XIV, p. 41) except that Fourth Liberty Loan Tem- 
porary Bonds, Nos. 490,434, 4,714,709 and 6,951,394 have been converted to Nos. 
H. 05,321,828; C. 04,921,513; and D. 04,921,514. These securities are held in safety 
deposit box of the First National Bank, Champaign, Illinois. 

By direction of the Executive Committee the Life Membership fee of W. M. 
Giffard ($50.00) and other such fecs as received will be invested in bonds. 


Respectfully submitted, 
C. L. METcaLr, Treasurer. 


On motion the reports of the Secretary-Treasurer were accepted 
and the financial parts thereof referred to the Auditing Committee. 


On motion, the Society selected by viva voce vote, the following 
subject for the symposium at the 1922, Boston meeting: 
“The Adaptations of Insects to Special Environments.”’ 


The following report was next presented: 


REPORT OF MANAGING EDITOR. 


Our publication for the year 1921 has apparently suffered no more from the 
prevailing difficulty in regard to printing than some of those of our sister Societies. 
In some respects we have, I think, gained ground and can report a fair prospect 
for the coming year. The income of the office has amounted to $863.92, which is a 
larger amount than has been received in any previous year, but it should be noted 
that several items have been collected which have come ovér from last year, and 
that we can hardly expect as large an amount for the coming year. It may be 
mentioned, however, that a considerable item, $211.85, represents sale of back 
volumes, and with resumption of scientific activities throughout the world, I 
think we can count on the sale of an increased number of back volumes which 
will help out in future publication. It may be stated also that back numbers and 
subscriptions have been entered from such widely separated localities as Japan, 
India, Australia, New Zealand, Ceylon, and Germany, which apparently marks 


1922] Metcalf: Proceedings of Toronto Meeting 109 


a recognition of the importance of our journal. There are stil! many institutions 
in foreign lands which must ultimately find it desirable to have our publication 
in their libraries. 


The receipts and expenditures may be summarized as follows: 


Receipts. 

SUIISORAE GIONS ery; eile Lae ark MMe See oe Foss SER Oe Se lea Sul: $289.50 
Dal vom DACk numbers: — veeie eit sharers. 3): <M Ree > Oe 211.85 
| S20 (26 | aa n's, DITA 0S ee pee hed Rey ei ea ae, ee 166.69 
ContributionsTOmensravine oa .0s).. 5 oa oR ls a ee 195.88 

———— $863 .92 

Disbursements. 

Shomps*, postal deposiis.and Express ep 2.4), «i108 Peele Desk ones $ 29.10 
Dlenosnraphic and clenicaleassistancey... +o... cease sae. 46.96 
Dalanice:; Paid LO; LeaStreh es ae, ee bar. 0 ees we cle 787 .86 

——— $863 . 92 


For the coming year we have a number of excellent papers in hand, and appar- 
ently our only difficulty in the matter of material lies in the lack_of funds with 
which to publish all the papers that are availaole. As in previous years, we have 
received generous contiibutions from authors toward the expense of engraving. 
Otherwise, a number of these papers would have had to be refused, or their printing 
much delayed. 

I wish to recommend the appointment of Dr. C. H. Kennedy as assistant 
managing editor, his name to appear on the front page of cover, in connection 
with the Editorial Board. Dr. Kennedy has kindly offered to assist in the details 
of handling the journal and with such assistance J believe it will be possible to 
continue the general management of the ANNALS, if this is desired by the Society. 


Respectfully submitted, 
HERBERT OsBoRN, Managing Editor. 


On motion, this report was accepted and referred to the Committee 
on Auditing. 
The next item of business was the following report: 


REPORT OF COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL MUSEUM. 


Your Committee begs leave to report that during the past year there has 
seemed to be no particular opening for activities in addition to the measures 
_which were inaugurated last year. The conditions with reference to the collections 
of insects have not been changed and it is desirable that every effort should be 
made to secure additional space suitable for the development of the collections, 
and to provide for additional curatorial service as rapidly as possible. The col- 
lections are increasing in quantity and value, and there should be every possible 
encouragement to entomologists throughout the country to deposit material. that 
may be of service in their extension. Especially is it desirable that type material 
should be represented in this museum as extensively as possible. 

The museum has, during the past year, utilized the services of certain special- 
ists in the rearrangement and the study of certain groups, and this policy would 
seem well worth continuation. There certainly should be a more general interest 
throughout the country in the growth of the national collections, and there should 


110 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


be a national pride in making them as extensive and useful as possible. It is very 
much to be hoped that in the near future it may be possible to secure adequate 
room for expansion, and statements concerning this need may very properly be 
made by individuals to any official who may be in a position to assist in this 
direction. 
Respectfully submitted, 

HERBERT OSBORN, Chairman, 

Wo. BARNES, 

Wn. M. WHEELER, 

Jas. G. NEEDHAM, 

C. W. JOHNSON. 


On motion, the report was accepted and filed. 


The following report was read and referred to the Auditing Com- 
mittee: 


REPORT OF THE TREASURER OF THE THOMAS SAY FOUNDATION. 
Receipts for 1921. 


Balance on Hand; January 1st Loo ey ve eas, atc leut oe ge tea cece ee $287 .41 
Oue Subscriber: $3.50. 25 nas pact ee eee ae eee ee ee $ 3.50 
KivetSubscrbers’ $3000 asset ecient Se ee eee 15.00 
18.50 
Interestion: >200 00 K(torseptemlberalls) yaar eee aren eee eee 8.50 
TotalsReceipts: MO ese axis cytes crease ache rae ere ied eee aes eee $314.41 
Expenditures for 1921. 
July 11th, Binding 50 volumes (Vol. 1)—Lafayette Printing Company...... $ 25.00 
IDs qoreSs) Chal GONE HO) WWEISaubarenwoyay IDE (Co Gosd sen abccnoscacaccboudsunass ae: 2.92 
Postage OnisSixiGOplesateiceteces « pees nas ioe e rs SiS nae CL Seka ie ene 76 
otal Expenditures; LO2MIh..3 eee aac a Mckee ee bine et Ee ee $ 28.68 
Cashionvhand tonballance saseict ccna ee OS ce eee ree oe 285.73 
Day =H Aenean are Cee nee te rer, SOR ne eRe NPRESNS oot EA EE A ao Ee eas n $314.41 
Balanceion hand sjantatye ll lO22e see eee eine er ei eee ee 285.73 


There are outstanding obligations to the original subscribers of $260.00, leav- 
ing a net balance of $25.73 to the credit of Volume I if the original grant of the 
Society of $50.00 is neglected, or a deficit of $23.39 if it is considered. 


Respectfully submitted, 
EK. D. BALL, Treasurer. 


The Society then heard the following report: 


REPORT OF THE AUDITING COMMITTEE. 
Your Auditing Committee, after examination of the accounts submitted, 
begs leave to report: 


1. That the accounts of the Managing Editor of the ANNALS from December 
21, 1920, to December 24, 1921, have been audited and found correct. 


1922] Metcalf: Proceedings of Toronto Meeting JAIL 


2. That accounts of Secretary-Treasurer of the Entomological Society from 
December 21, 1920, to December 24, 1921, have been audited and found correct, 
with the exception of errors in computations to the amount of $1.50 in favor of the 
Society. 

3. The report of the Treasurer of the Thomas Say Foundation has been 
received and is recommended to be placed on file. 

4. Your Committee, in the interests of the officers of the Society and for the 
information of future Auditing Committees recommends that the Reports of the 
Auditing Committee from year to year be made a part of the permanent records 
of the Society. 

Respectfully submitted, 
S. J. HUNTER, 
NORMAN CRIDDLE. 


On motion, this report was accepted. 


The Committee on Nomenclature presented no formal report but 
the following statement from one of its members was read by the 
President: 


THE PUBLICATION OF INADMISSIBLE SPECIFIC NAMES. 


It has been customary to allow very great latitude in the matter of specific 
names, but obviously there must be some limits beyond which names proposed 
are to be rejected as not in conformity with the rules. We would call attention 
to one objectionable practise, which we think should not be permitted. In 1906 
Kohl published an excellent work on the Hymenoptera of Sokotra in which he 
published two species as Eucera W. F. Kirbyi and Megachile W. F. Kirbyi. During 
the present year, Strand has published a species Andrena W. A. Schulzt from 
Crete. Frieso, in citing Kohl’s Megachile, wrote it M. Kirbyi. These names 
may be considered to present a certain analogy with those of Coccinella 22-punctata 
L., C. 18-guttata L. etc., but these latter can be latinized, and are so treated in 
Leng’s catalogue. An attempt to latinize in full the above-cited names of Kohl 
and Strand would produce appellations which we should hesitate to print. No 
doubt Frieso was correct in writing MW. Kirbyi, simply. The question arises, how- 
ever, as to the proper authority of thename. If M. W. F. Kirbyi is to be rejected 
as contrary to the rules, it has no better standing than a polynomial and in that 
case dates, from the standpoint of nomenclature, from Frieso’s publication, and 
he stands as the author. 

In this country, in 1894. Dyar published a description of a sawfly as Nematus 
hudsonu magnus, not intending to indicate a subspecies. Marlatt, in 1896, called 
the species Pleronus hudsonu Dyar. Dyar’s name, as it stood, was clearly a poly- 
nomial. We venture to suggest that the above criticised names should be rejected 
as contrary to the rules and rejected in toto. 

We would also call attention to the apparently increasing frequency of badly 
constructed names, which cannot be rejected, but remain to offend subsequent 
generations of those who have any appreciation of latin or greek usage, cr even of 
elegance in language. Would it serve a useful purpose to compile annually and 
present at the meeting of the Society a list of the worst of these, as a warning for 
the future? 

(Signed) T. D. A. COCKERELL. 


112 Annals Entomological Society of America  [Vol. XV, 


The Committee on Resolutions reported as follows: 


The Committee on Resolutions has the honor to report as follows: 


(1) We desire to call attention to the faithful and efficient services of our 
Executive Committee, to the courtesies extended to us by the University of 
Toronto and the Royal Canadian Institute and to the excellent arrangements 
made by the Local Committee of the Association anc to express our sincere thanks 
for their services. 

(2) WHEREAS, The Science of Entomology has suffered the loss of one of its 
pioneer workers and this Society one of its most valued members and Honorary 
Fellows in the recent death of Prof. C. H. Fernald; therefore 

Be it Resolved, That we take this occasion to express our deep grief over his 
loss; and be it further 

Resolved, That we extend our sympathies to his family. 

(Signed ) E. MELVILLE Du Porte, 
late (Gg Shue daca 
W. Po BEEN: 


The Nominating Committee reported as follows: 


REPORT OF NOMINATING COMMITTEE. 


Your Committee on Nominations has to report as follows: 
For President—ARTHUR GIBSON. 
For First Vice-President—W. A. RILEY. 
For Second Vice-President—R. A. COOLEY. 
For Secretary-Treasurer—C. L. METCALF. 
For Members of the Executive Committee—J. M. ALpRIcH, Wm. T. Davis, 
KE. M. WALKER, O. A. JOHANNSEN. 
(Signed) R. W. HARNED, 
H. B. HUNGERFORD, 
R. L. WEBSTER. 


On motion the report was accepted and the Secretary instructed to 
cast the unanimous ballot of the Society for these officers; which, 
being done, they were declared elected. 


The Secretary presented the following resolutions which were 
adopted by a conference called by the Division of Biology and Agricul- 
ture of the National Research Council held in the King Edward Hotel 
on the afternoon of. December 27th: 


Resolved, (1) That it is the sense of this conference that an inter-society 
conference should be raised to study and report upon the feasibility of federation 
of the biological societies and to develop plans for the said federation. 

Resolved, (2) That for the purpose of effecting such an organization, each 
society, and Sections F. and G. of the American Association for the Advancement 
of Science, be requested to designate its President and Secretary as members of 
an intersociety council which shall be authorized (a) to deal with all matters of 
common interest such as the correlation of programs, studying problems of pub- 


1922]. _ Metcalf: Proceedings of Toronto Meeting 113 


lication, the reorganization of bibliographies, etc., that are consistent with the 
existing regulations of constituent societies; and (b) to draw up proposals for a 
Constitution and By-laws of a federation of the societies in question, and to pre- 
sent them for action at the next annual meeting. 

Although no formal action was taken, it was understood that the conference 
raised by the adhering societies should be empowered to invite other organizations 
to join it later. 


On motion the Society approved these resolutions and designated 
its President and Secretary to represent it in this Council. 


It was moved by W. A. Riley that the matter of adjustment of the 
$50.00 loaned to the Thomas Say Foundation be referred to the Execu- 
tive Committee with power to act; but with the expression of opinion 
on the part of the Society that the same should be given to the Thomas 
Say Foundation. The motion carried and the matter was so referred. 

It was moved by J. Chester Bradley that the Executive Committee 
be requested to extend an invitation to leading Entomologists of Central 
and South America to become members in order to make the Society 
more fully representative of the Western Hemisphere. 

The motion carried and the President, the Secretary and Doctor 
Bradley were designated a committee to extend these invitations. 


The following Amendment to the Constitution was proposed and is 
hereby recorded for consideration at the next annual meeting: 

ARTICLE V, SECTION 4. ELECTION oF HONORARY FELLOWsS.—AII nominations for 
Honorary Fellows shall be made in the manner prescribed for the nomination of 
Fellows, the nominations being presented to the Executive Committee, who shall 
mail the ballots to the Fellows. Election shall be by mail ballot of the Fellows of 
the Society, a two-thirds vote of all the Fellows being required for election. 

To be amended to read: Honorary Fellows may be nominated by 
unanimous vote of the members of the Executive Committee present at 
an annual meeting. The nominee shall be voted on by the members by 
ballot and must receive four-fifths of all ballots cast to be elected. 

Not more than one Honorary Fellow may be elected in three 
successive annual meetings. 

ARTICLE VI, MEeEetINGs.—An Annual Meeting shall be held in conjunction with 
the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science 
and at such time and place as the officers may elect. 

To be amended to read: An Annual Meeting shall be held in 
affiliation with the American Association for the Advancement of 
Science or at such time and place as the Executive Committee may 
select. 


There being no further business, the session adjourned. 


114 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


FOURTH SESSION. 


The Society was called to order at 2:00 P. M., December 28th, in 
Room 10 of the Medical Building. President Aldrich introduced Dr. 
Seymour Hadwen, of the United States Biological Survey, who pre- 
sented the Annual Address on the Subject, ‘‘ Northern Oestride.”’ 


Dr. Aldrich then introduced Dr. C. J. S. Bethune, an Honorary 
Fellow of the Society and long-time Editor of the Canadian Entomol- 
ogist, who was very warmly greeted by the audience. 


FIFTH SESSION. 


The final session of the 1921 meetings was a joint session with the 
Entomological Society of Ontario, at which Mr. Arthur Gibson, Pres- 
ident of the Entomological Society of Ontario and President-elect of 
the Entomological Society of America presided. The Session met at 
3:00 P. M., December 28th, in Room 10 of the Medical Building, and 
the following papers were presented: 


Algonquin Days. F. J. A. Morris, Peterborough, Ontario. 

Ecdysis in Tmetocera ocellana. S. W. Frost, Arendtsville, Pa. 

Cocoon Spinning by Species of Bucculatrix. O. A. JOHANNSEN, Cornell Uni- 
versity. 

The Ventral Prothoracic Gland of the Red-humped Apple Caterpillar 
(Schizura concinna). J. D. DETWILER, Western University. 

Are There Two Species of the Oyster-shell Scale? Grace H. GRISWOLD, 
Cornell University. 

The Phylogeny of the Gall Mites and a New Classification of the Suborder 
Prostigmata of the Order Acarina. H. E. Ew1nc, United States National Museum. 

An Extreme Case of Delayed Fall Emergence of Hessian Fly (Phytophaga 
destructor). W. H. LARRIMER, United States Bureau of Entomology. 

Importance of Insects in the Food of the Brook Trout. W. A. CLEMENs, 
University of Toronto. 

The Effect of Vitamines on the Growth of Ephestia kuehniella in Wheat Flour. 
CHARLES H. RICHARDSON, U. S. Bureau of Entomology. 


Adjournment. 


NOTICE TO MEMBERS AND CONTRIBUTORS. 


The Annals of the Entomological Society of America, pub- 
lished by the Society quarterly, includes the Proceedings of the 
Annual meetings and such papers as may be selected by the 
Editorial Board. 


Papers may be submitted to any member of the Editorial 
Board and should be as nearly as possible in the form desired as 
final, preferably typewritten, and illustrations must be finished 
complete ready for reproduction. Plates must not exceed 5x7 
inches unless intended to fold. In general, papers to be accepted 
must be original, complete and previously unpublished and, 
except in connection with the proceedings, it will not be the 
policy to publish preliminary announcements or notes. Authors 
will be allowed fifty reprints gratis and additional copies at cost 
to the Society. 


The Managing Editor is provided with the most recent 
address of all paid-up members on record in the Secretary’s 
office for mailing the numbers of the Annals and members 
failing to receive their numbers should present their complaint 
to the Managing Editor within four months from the date of 
the mailing of the issue. After that time the numbers will 
be furnished only at the regular published rate. 


The regular annual subscription price for the ANNALS is in 
the United States, Cuba, Porto Rico, Hawaii and Mexico, $3.00; 
Canada, $3.50; other countries, $4.00. Checks, drafts or money 
orders should be drawn payable to ANNALS ENTOMOLOGICAL 
SocrreTyY OF AMERICA, and addressed to HERBERT OSBORN, 
State University, Columbus, Ohio, U. 5. A. 


Requests for information as to membership and the annual 
dues of members should be sent to the Secretary-Treasurer, 
Dr. C. L. Metcatr, Natural History Building, University of 
Illinois, Urbana, Il. 


Communications relating to the ANNALS, and all orders for 
separate copies or reprints should be addressed to 
| HERBERT OsBorn, Managing Editor, 
ANNALS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 
State University, Columbus, Ohio. 


CONTENTS OF THIS NUMBER. 


WALKER, EH. M.—The Terminal Structures of Orthop- 
teroid Insects: A Phylogenetic Study. (Part II.) 1 


BARNES, WM., AND LINDSEY, A. W.—A Review of 
Some Generic Names in the Order Lepidoptera... 89 


Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the 
Entomological Society of America ........--..- 100 


Price List of Publications. 


Annals, Vols.:Z to XIV, complete; each ii fo te ee OE Aas $3.00 
Annals, Separate Parts, except as below, each.......... cece cece cee ccees 1.00 
Annals; Vols: 1 and/ ii; Part 3) each coo hee SR ee Ln nial .50 
Annals, Vol, dV Rart 4, each. ecco 20h i ea ae an Ue 1.50 


BACK VOLUMES 


Of the ANNALS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SocIETY oF AMERICA may 
be secured from the office of the Managing Editor and new members 
of the Society who may wish to complete a set are advised to secure 
the earlier volumes while there is still a supply on hand and the price 
is kept at the original subscription rate. 

Address HERBERT OsBorn, Managing Editor, 


ANNALS ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 
Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. 


Volume XV. Number 2. 


ANNALS 


OF 


The Entomological Society of America 


JUNE, 1922 


EDITORIAL BOARD 


HERBERT OSBORN, Managing Editor, 
COLUMBUS, OHIO. 


CLARENCE H. KENNEDY, Ass’t Managing Editor, 
COLUMBUS, OHIO. 

WM. S. MARSHALL, 

MADISON, WIS. 


VERNON L. KELLOGG, 


A. D. HOPKINS, 
WASHINGTON, D. C. 


A. lL. LOVETT, 
CORVALLIS, OREGON. WASHINGTON, D. C. 
S. A. FORBES, WM. M. WHEELER, 


Boston, MASss. 


E. M. WALKER, 
TORONTO, CANADA. 


URBANA, ILLINOIS. 


FRANK E. LUTZ, 
NEw YorRK City, N. Y. 


FREDERICK C. MUIR, 
HONOLULU, Hawali. 


PUBLISHED QUARTERLY BY THE SOCIETY 
COLUMBUS, OHIO 


Entered as second class matter April 11, 1908, at the Pest Office at Columbus, Ohio, 
under the Act of Congress of March 3, 1879. 


ETE TIO en, 
ee 


iy lat insé byw 

Agu tlall ity: 

\v 559 \ 
4 


a 


The Entomological Society of America 
Founded 1906. 


OFFICERS 1922. 


President 
ARTHUR GIBSON. : 2 : ; : : Ottawa, Canada 


First Vice-President 
Wi AGRI Ev oc : : , : y : St. Paul, Minnesota 


Second Vice-President 
BA, COOLEey 2 : , é ; 3 : Bozeman, Montana 


Managing Editor Annals 
HERBERT OSBORN. : aa ; 3 . Columbus, Ohio 


Secretary-Treasurer 
CL -GWPRTCATEY aes cn OO NER yee coe ooh a ieee (Utrera a an @is 


Executive Committee 


THE OFFICERS 


AND 
J. M. Avpricu, E. M. WALKER, 


Wm. T. Davis, O. A. JOHANNSEN, 


Committee on Nomenclature 


HY Poorer T. D. A. CocKERELL, NATHAN BANKS. 


Thomas Say Foundation 


NATHAN BANKS, A. D. MacGILtivRay, PP) CALVERT, 
E. B. WILLIAMSON, Wu. T. Davis, 
J. M. Atpricu, Editor. E. D. Batt, Treasurer, 


Committee on National Museum 
HERBERT Osporn, Chairman. 
C. W. JoHNsoN, Wm. BARNES, Ww. M. WHEELER, 
James G. NEEDHAM. 


ANNALS 


OF 


The Entomological Society of America 


Volume XV JUNE; 1922 Number 2 


ON THE SOUTH AMERICAN SPECIES OF THE 
DIPTEROUS GENUS CHIROMYZA WIED. 


By PROFESSOR M. Bezz1, 
Turin, Italy. 


In the recently published Revision of the Chiromyzini by 
Mr. G. H. Hardy* Australian forms only have been dealt 
with. In the present paper the writer will take into consideration 
South American forms only. 

Agreeing with Verrall (Brit. Flies V, p. 44) the Chiromyzini 
are accepted here as a tribe of the family Stratiomyiide, chiefly 
on account of the form and position of the prefurca; but they 
have many important characters in common with the Rhag- 
ionide. 

The main character of the tribe is that of the atrophied 
mouth parts, which must be in correlation with some peculiar 
habits of the adult flies. In addition may be recorded the 
sunken face and the greatly developed and apparently bisected 
front coxe. The third antennal joint is more or less distinctly 
annulated; the last abdominal segments of the female are 
Ovipositor-like; the tibiz are not spurred. The wings have the 
ambient vein complete, even if sometimes very thin; a short 
prefurca; only 4 posterior cells, all open; the anal cell closed 
and stalked, but long. 

Because of the normally developed mouth parts the genus 
Allognosta must be placed in the Beridint. 

A peculiar feature of the Chiromyzini is the great varia- 
bility in venation of the wings. Mr. Hardy points out that in 


se aeetaes of the Linn. Soc. of N. S. W. XLV, 1920, p. 532-542, pl. XXIX- 
Oe : 


117 


118 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


Australian forms even the upper branch of the cubital fork may 
be variable, being present in some specimens of one species 
and wanting in others. I have never found this to be the case 
with South American forms, which all have an unforked cubital 
vein, except in /fylorus. I have observed the following 
anomalies: 


(a) The hind cross-vein may be more or less obliterated, in part or as a whole, 


the discoidal cell being thus partly or entirely open. 
(b) The third vein issuing from the discoidal cell may be quite wanting or 


represented by a short stump. 
(c) The ambient vein may be sometimes rather indistinct, chiefly in female 


specimens. 


It is evident that this variation by reduction refers chiefly if 
not exclusively to the veins of the hind half of the wings. It 
may be interpreted as a condition of the true Stratiomyiid flies, 
in which the veins of the fore half only are thickened and 
crowded together near the costa, and as a tendency toward 
degeneration of wing, a fact which has reached its climax in 


the Australian genus Boreoides with subapterous females. 
The South American genera of the tribe may be distinguished 
as follows: 
1. (2) Third longitudinal vein forked; eyes bare and united in the male; third 
antennal joint with numerous annulations.................. Hylorus Phil. 
2. (1) Third longitudinal vein simple; third antennal joint with less than 
8 annulations. 
3. (6) Eyes of male united, quite bare or with few and scattered hairs; third 
antennal joint more or less distinctly annulated or even simple. 


4. (5) First antennal joint much longer than the second, being as long as the 
[Elchh WG epee Ana Satan IaRteea ob ao buatnc eietcad o otdia amiotent se cao pid Goer: Inopus Walk. 


5. (4) First antennal joint as long as the second and much shorter than the third; 
metapleura with short hairs; wings with microscopical pubescence and with 
the first longitudinal vein clothed with short hairs...... Chiromyza Wied. 


6. (3) Eyes of male broadly separated, and clothed with abundant and short 
hairs; third antennal joint with deep annulation, and much longer than the 
first; metapleura with long hairs; wings with long pubescence and with the 
first longitudinal vein clothed with long hairs........ Barbiellinia, n. genus 


I. Hylorus Philippi. 
The unique South American form with forked third longitudinal 
vein, only known by the type species Krausei Phil. from Chile. Placed 
in Chiromyza by Hardy; not seen by the writer. 


II. Inopus Walker. 

The unique South American form with elongated first antennal 
joint, only known by the type species despectus Walker from South 
America. Placed by Mr. Hardy with a query in synonomy with the 
Australian Metoponia rubriceps Macq.; not seen. 


1922] Bezzi: South American Chiromyza 119 


III. Chiromyza Wiedemann. 


The genus Xenomorpha Macquart, with the type leptiformis Macq. 
from Rio Janeiro, is evidently the same; likewise the genus Nonacris 
Walker.* with the type transequa Walk. from South America; and 
even the genus Lagarus Philippi with the type paulseni Phil. from 
Chile, and Lagarinus Enderlein with the type paradoxus End. from 
Chile, as pointed out by Mr. Hardy. 


It may be noted that in the original figure of the type species 
by Wiedemann the second longitudinal vein of the wings was 
omitted, perhaps accidentally. This vein is well shown in the 
figure of Xenomorpha by Macquart. 


The South American forms before me can be distinguished 
as follows: 


1. (8) Anal cell long, its terminal stalk being much shorter than the preceding 

part of the postical vein; halteres and coxe of a pale yellowish color. 

2. (7) The fourth longitudinal vein is forked before the hind crossvein, which 
is always complete; the second posterior cell is therefore sessile and rather 
obtuse at base; the third vein issuing from the discoidal cell frequently 
present in the shape of a short stump; scutellum never greenish. 

(4) Back of thorax with four longitudinal dark stripes; pleuree with several 
Pole kal Siar SIO USM treet es eines cates ares cre ole ellie OO sie seine vingoe ar vittata Wied. 

(3) Thorax with three longitudinal stripes only, or not evenly striped. 

(6) The 3 dark stripes on thorax are broad and partly confluent, the back 
appearing thus in great part infuscated........../.......-:.. fuscana, Wied 

(5) The above named stripes less developed and often obliterated, the back 
appearing for the most part reddish yellow................-. ochracea Wied. 

(2) The fourth vein forks beyond the hind cross-vein, which is often obliterated 
in its upper portion, or quite wanting; the second posterior cell is there- 
fore acute at base and mostly provided with a short stalk; the rudiment of 
the third branch of media is never present; sides of thorax and of scutellum 
CARES! TITS 112 WO See Ca Eat te Oe PO DOR nee Deeg were viridis n. var. 

(1) Anal cell rather short, its stalk being about as long as the preceding portion 
of the postical vein; the whole antenne, the halteres and the coxe quite 
Dales ees coe aN hme: choke enone wis Seton s Salter 28 nigra n. sp. 


Be eis 


oe 


1. Chiromyza vittata Wied. (leptiformis Macq.) 


As shown in the original figures by Wiedemann and by Macquart, 
the main character of the present form is that of the divided middle 
dark stripe of the back of mesonotum, which has therefore 4 longitudinal 
stripes. I have in my collection 3 female specimens from S. Sebastiao, 
seashore of the State of S. Paulo, Brazil, collected by the Count A. A. 
Barbiellini. They agree in having the discoidal cell broad and obtuse 
outwardly, the second posterior cell with broad sessile base, the anal 
cell with short terminal stalk. One specimen only shows the short 
basal rudiment of M 3. The scutellum of the female has a shining 
black depression on each side at base; the same depression in the male is 
reddish or only a little darkened. 


*It must be noted that in the original description for ‘Fourth posterior areo- 
let closed before the border’’, the anal cell is meant. 


120 Annals Entomological Society of America  |Vol. XV, 


2. Chiromyza vittata fuscana Wied. 

Numerous. specimens. of .both sexes, some in copula, from 
Puerta Bertoni, Alto Parania, Paraguay, June, 1919, collected by 
Mr. C. Schrottky. One male specimen from S. Sebastiao, Brazil, by 
A. A. Barbiellini. 

These specimens agree in having the middle dark stripe of thorax 
undivided, and usually prolonged behind to the scutellum; the back 
of mesonotum is broadly infuscated; the dark spots of the pleure are 
less developed; the scutellar depressions as in the preceding. 

The venation is as in vittata; the rudiment of M 3 is present in 11 
specimens of 12. There are frequently abnormal cross-veins in the 
base of the second posterior cell, forming 1-4 small supernumerary cells; 
they are present in all the female specimens, but are not symmetrically 
placed, being often present on one wing only. 


3. Chiromyza vittata ochracea Wied. 

(? transequa Walk.) 

This is the palest of all the forms, with unspotted pleura and 
bright orange abdomen. 

One male specimen from S. Paulo, Brazil, March, 1906 (R. von 
Ihering). Agreeing in venation with the preceding forms; there is no 
rudiment of M 3. 


4. Chiromyza vittata viridis n. var. 

Two males from S. Paulo, Brazil (A. A. Barbiellini). They seem to 
agree with ochracea Schiner in being more slender than the preceding 
forms. 

Male, length of body, 8-9 mm.; of wing, 8-9 mm. 

Eyes closely approximated, but a very small stripe of the frons is 
visible between them. Third antennal joint twice as long as the two 
first joints together, black, pilose, distinctly annulated. 

Thorax reddish on the back, with three less marked dark longitu- 
dinal stripes; pleuree pale yellowish, unspotted; the sides of the back 
posteriorly and the border of the scutellum are distinctly greenish. 
Halteres pale yellow as in all the preceding forms. Abdomen entirely 
orange, more pale on the venter. Coxe and legs entirely pale yellowish, 
with last tarsal joint blackened; trochanters greenish. Wings yellowish, 
hyaline. One of the two specimens has the discoidal cell complete; in 
the other only a stump of the hind cross vein is present inferiorly, the 
cell being broadly open. Both specimens have the second posterior cell 
acute at base and there provided with a short stalk, which forms a 
common basal stem for M; and Me; the discoidal cell is acute out- 
wardly; there is no rudiment of M3; the terminal stalk of the anal cell 
is short as usual. The present species shows that the condition of 
Lagarinus is a casual one; but Enderlein’s species has the third antennal 
joint not annulated. 


1922] Bezzi: South American Chiromyza 121 


5. Chiromyza nigra n. spec. 

Type o’, a single specimen in the writer's collection from Ecuador, 
received many years ago from Dr. J. Escher-Kundig, Zurich, Switz- 
erland. 


This may be a melanic mountain form, but it is here described as 
specifically distinct, chiefly on account of the peculiar shape of the anal 
cell, which recalls the condition of this same cell in the Beridine. 


o& Length of body 11 mm., of wing 10 mm. 


Head entirely black, but the occiput and the face densely covered 
with a dark gray dust. Ocellar tubercle deep black. Eyes bare, inti- 
mately united, no distinct line being visible between them. Antenne 
entirely black; the 2 basal joints are of about equal length; the third 
joint is only a little longer than the two first joints together; it is 
pilose, but I cannot perceive trace of its annulation because of its bad 
preservation. Mouth parts rudimentary as usual. 


Thorax blackish-brown on the back, more reddish on the sides, with 
a short darkish pubescence; pleuree dark brownish, more pale on the 
sternopleura; hairs of meso- and metopleura very short. Scutellum 
blackish, with more pale border; lateral depressions black. Halteres 
with yellowish stalk, but with a black knob. 


Abdomen dull black, with shining black genitalia, which have the 
upper lamella deeply emarginate and yellowish at end. Venter yellowish 
grey. Coxe shining black, with the sutures reddish; femora yellowish, 
with the apical part blackish-brown,; tibize and tarsi almost entirely 
blackened, only the base of tibize and of pretarsi being more pale; 
claws black, with reddish base; the 4 posterior tibie are thickened and 
a little curved as usual. 


Wings greyish hyaline, with a faint yellowish tint on costal cell. 
Discoidal cell open, only the lower part of the hind cross vein being 
present; no rudiment of Ms. Second posterior cell acute at base. The 
two branches of M and the distal portion of upper branch of Cu are 
very faint, almost spurious, perhaps due to immaturity of specimen. 
The stalk of the anal cell is much longer than in any of the preceding 
forms of vittata, being about as long as the preceding part of the postical 
vein; surface of wing is microscopically pubescent as usual. 


IV. Barbiellinia new genus. 


Closely allied with Chiromyza, but at once distinguished by the 
long haired and broadly separated eyes of the male; moreover the hairs 
of the body, legs and wings are much more developed than in the allied 
forms. According to Mr. Hardy, Australian species of Chiromyza have 
either contiguous or separated eyes in the males; but the present case 
is the first known among Brazilian forms, and is here assumed as being 
of generic value on account of the unusual hairiness of the eyes. 

Head rounded, rather small size, more narrow than the thorax. 
Occiput triangularly excavated above, with no prominent borders. The 
three ocelli are of rather large size, placed in an equilateral triangle on 


1) Annals Entomological Society of America _[Vol. XV, 


an inconspicuous plate. Eyes rounded, with equal areolets, clothed 
with numerous, but not dense, long hairs. Frons with parallel sides, 
only a little constricted towards its middle, not at all prominent in 
profile, about a half of the breadth of one eye. Antenne inserted below; 
the second joint being a little longer than the first; third joint as long 
as the two first joints together, divided into three parts by two com- 
plete and deep annulations; it is entirely clothed with rather long 
hairs, like the basal joints. Face receding, sunken in the middle as 
in the Rhagionide. Mouth parts rudimentary; proboscis atrophied, 
palpi very small. Thorax greatly developed, almost puffed up and 
convex above; metapleura with long, erect hairs. Scutellum elongated, 
rounded behind, flat above, with well developed basal depressions on 
the sides, destitute of longer hairs at hind border. Halteres large, 
with oval knob; squamule rudimentary. Abdomen flattened, composed 
of 7 segments, the last of which is only one-half as long as the preced- 
ing one; genitalia small, but open. Legs long, intermediate pair short- 
est. Front coxe greatly developed and apparently bisected, the plate 
above them being very large; middle and hind tibiz distinctly curved 
and thickened; claws and pulvilli proportionately small. Pubescence 
of legs and hairs of coxe longer than in Chiromyza. Wings distinctly 
pubescent on the whole surface; first and third longitudinal veins 
clothed with long hairs above. Prefurca short, originating over 
the base of the discoidal cell. Second longitudinal vein short; 
third vein single, ending before the tip of the wing; costa thickened 
to a short space beyond the tip of third vein, but prolonged 
as a thin ambient vein along the whole hind border of the wing. Dis- 
coidal cell complete, about as long as broad, obtuse at its distal end; 
second posterior cell sessile at base, the M forking before the hind cross 
vein; the rudiment of M3 is wanting. Stalk of the anal cell short, much 
shorter than the preceding part of the postical vein. Alula rudimentary. 
Hind border of the wing with rather long ciliation. 


Named in honor of the Count A. A. Barbiellini, who during 
the long years of his residence in S. Paulo has greatly contrib- 
uted to the progress of entomological studies in Brazil, by the 
publication of the Journal ‘‘O Entomologista Brasileiro”’ 1908— 
1910, and now by the general Review ‘‘Chacaras e Quintaes.”’ 
The writer is indebted to him for large collections of Brazilian 
Diptera, the exposition of which will appear in the future. 


Type: the following new species. 


Barbiellinia hirta n. sp. 


Type o a single specimen in the writer’s collection from Terme do 
Lindoya (1000 m.), Serra Negra, Eita do do S. Paulo, Brazil, March, 
1918. (A. A. Barbiellini). 


& Length of body 8 mm.; of wing 8 mm. 


1922] Bezzi: South American Chiromyza 123 


Head entirely yellowish, the occiput whitish, dusted; ocellar plate 
black; occipital border with a narrow white line and with erect black 
hairs. Frons with a narrow, less distinct, dark transverse band on the 
middle, whole length clothed with erect black hairs. Antennz entirely 
yellowish, black haired. Hairs of the eyes black. Face with black hairs 
on the sides; palpi reddish. Thorax on the back yellowish-brown, with 
rather long dark pubescence; the middle of the dark longitudinal 
stripes is abbreviated behind, divided along the middle by a pale line, 
but the lateral ones are not distinct. Pleura pale yellowish, unspotted, 
with rather long hairs on the mesopleura, and with longer ones on the 
metapleura. Scutellum like the thorax, with short dark pubescence. 
Halteres pale yellowish, dirty on the knob. Mesonotum pale yellowish. 
Abdomen yellowish above, rather shining, with blackish pubescence; all 
the segments are narrowly black on the sides; venter pale yellowish; geni- 
talia quite reddish, even on the upper lamella and lateral appendages. 
Coxe and legs entirely pale yellowish, the last tarsal segments only being 
blackened; coxe clothed with rather long black hairs, even the black 
pubescence of the remainder of the legs being longer than usual. All the 
femora are equally thin; front tibiz thin, much more slender than the 
others; claws proportionally short; the three pulvilli dirty yellowish. 
Wings grayish hyaline, with dark yellowish veins, the basal portion of 
the fourth longitudinal vein being whitish. 


ADDITIONAL NOTE. 


Having received a paratype of Boreoides subulatus, through 
the courtesy of Mr. G. H. Hardy, and comparing it with the 
types of Boreoides tasmaniensis I have found: 


(a) That the differences in the annulation of the third antennal joint and in 
the position of the hind coxe are not consistent, these organs being not differently 
shaped or located in both the species. 


(6) On the contrary the differences in the form of the scutellum, in the length 
of the wing-rudiments and in the coloration of thorax, are of great importance. 


I find, moreover, that the legs of tasmaniensis are thinner and more 
slender than in subulatus, which is chiefly evident in the tarsi, which 
are not at all incrassated in the former. Even the color of the legs is 
lighter in tasmaniensis, the tibiz and tarsi being entirely yellowish, 
while in subulatus they are in greatest part black. The two species are 
without doubt distinct; and Mr. Hardy informs me that even in 
Australia there are several different species of Boreoides not yet 
described. 


ADDITIONAL NOTE (2). 


In the meantime a paper by Dr. Ginther Enderlein, Berlin, has 
appeared (Ueber die phyletisch alteren Stratiomyiidensubfamilien, in 
Mitteil. Zoolog. Mus. Berlin, X, 1921, pp. 153-214), in which a new 
classification of the Chiromyzini is proposed, with the descriptions of 
many new genera and species. 


124 Annals Entomological Society of America _[Vol. XV, 


The South American species with contiguous eyes of the male are 
subdivided between the genera Xenomorpha Macquart, Mesomyza 
Enderlein and Nonacris Walker; while those with the separated and hairy 
eyes of the male are united in the genus Chiromyza Wiedemann. But 
this proceeding is evidently contrary to Wiedemann’s statement, which 
says in the original diagnosis of the genus: “* * * * oculi maribus 
contigui: * * * Augen beim Mannchen zusammenstossend * * *” 
I am therefore of the opinion that the nomenclature used by me is 
more correct. The type species vittata Wiedemann was described only 
from the female sex, and thus there are no male types of it; Enderlein 
moreover, has not seen the female type. The genus Inopus is placed in 
synonymy with Xenomorpha; the genera Lagarus and Lagarinus are 
not mentioned at all. 


CONTRIBUTIONS TO A KNOWLEDGE OF THE 
CRAMBINAE. II. 


Crambus laqueatelilus Clemens. 


By GEo. G. AINSLIE, 
U. S. Bureau of Entomology. 


Crambus laqueatellus is one of the largest and most beautifully 
marked species in this genus and 1s easily distinguished from all 
other North American forms by the two parallel silver stripes 
running almost the full length of the fore wing. (Fig. II, 6). 


SYSTEMATIC HISTORY. 


Crambus laqueatellus was first described by Clemens in 
1860. Walker redescribed it in 1863 from specimens from 
‘“‘North America’ as C. semifusellus, a name reduced to 
synonomy in 1891 by Smith. Aside from its inclusion in 
various lists and the few references to it as an economic species 
its literature is meager. Fernald (1896) and Holland (1903) 
both figure the moth in colors. Nothing has ever been written 
about any stages other than the adult, except Felt’s (1894) 
description of the egg and first stage larva. In other respects 
also his notes are hitherto the most extensive of any relating 
to this species. 


DISTRIBUTION. 


It is a North American species and occurs throughout a 
section of the United States extending from Maine to Texas 
and from Louisiana and Tennessee on the south to Colorado 
and southern Minnesota on the north. The writer has seen 
specimens from nearly every state within this area. The 
Texas record is based on Zeller (1872) who received specimens, 
presumably from Bosque County, collected by Boll. Fyles 
(1896) records it from Montreal and Quebec, Zeller (1863), 
Lintner (1874) and Felt (1894) list it from New York State, 
and Fernald (1896) from Maine and Louisiana. As indicated 
by Fyles’ records, the species extends somewhat into Canada, 
but it does not appear in Allen’s (1918) list of Nova Scotian 


125 


126 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


Crambine. The shaded portion of the accompanying map 
(Fig. I) indicates at a glance the territory from which /aquea- 
tellus has been reported but more extensive collections will 
likely somewhat extend these limits. 


Wola showing \Kuew 4 Ones aalier of Qvambus \aquedtdlus Clem 


BiG. Ie 


SEASONAL HISTORY. 


Crambus laqueatellus has one distinct generation annually. 
In Tennessee, where the appearance of the moths has been 
closely watched for several years, the period during which they 
have been found in the field extends from April 24 to May 31. 
Farther north they appear correspondingly later. Felt (1894) 
states that this is the earliest species to appear in New York 
State and that at Ithaca it has a compact breeding season of 
about five weeks. His trap light record for 1889 shows that 
at Ithaca specimens were taken from May 26 to June 17. 
According to Webster (1896) moths were abundant in northern 
Ohio in 1881 from May 29 to June 17. At Columbus, Ohio, 
Hine (1897) records the moths as present the latter part of 
April and through May. In Smith’s (1900) New Jersey list 
the species is recorded for May, June and August. August 
is included on the basis of a single moth taken on the 31st. 
This record and one by Gillette (1898) mentioning the capture 


1922] Ainslie: Crambus laqueatellus Clem. 127 


of a specimen at light at Denver, Colo., on August 16, seem to 
indicate that there is a sight tendency toward a second genera- 
tion. This is corroborated by the results of our rearing experi- 
ments, reported in more detail later, where moths matured 
in September from eggs laid the previous May. In general, 
however, it may be assumed that there is but a single annual 
generation, the period during which the moths are present in 
any given locality covering about five weeks. The following 
table gives the dates within which the moths have been recorded 
in the respective states. 


Illinois—May 14—-May 28. New Jersey—May 18-June 24. 
Iowa—June 6—June 16. New York—May 20-June 24. 
Kentucky—May 23-June 21. Ohio—June 9. 

Maryland—May 8—May 28. Pennsylvania—June 14—June 30. 
Michigan—June 6—June 14. Tennessee—April 24—May 31. 
Minnesota—June 6. Wisconsin—June 15. 

New Hampshire—June 2. District of Columbia—May 20. 


This list is very incomplete, but will serve as a starting 
point for further observations. 


The larve have never been taken in the field and nothing 
is known of their seasonal habits. Judging from others of 
this genus it may be predicted that the larve feed and grow 
during the late spring and summer, reach their growth by the 
end of the summer season and then remain quiescent in their 
cocoons during the winter, pupating ten days or two weeks 
before their emergence in the spring. Whether they feed at 
all in the spring or complete their growth in the fall is a fact 
that will have to be ascertained by further studies. 


ECONOMIC HISTORY. 


Unless further observations bring to light something entirely 
new in the economy of this species, it must be listed as of little 
or no economic importance. It has once been charged with 
injury but it seems certain that it was a case of mistaken 
identity or bad companions. F. M. Webster (1896) found the 
moths abundant in association with those of Crambus trisectus 
and C. mutabilis a short time after crambid larve had devastated 
fields of grass and small grain in northern Ohio in 1896. While 
laqueatellus larve, if present in numbers, might somewhat 
intensify the damage in such a case, it is very much more 
probable that the injury should be laid to the other two species, 


128 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


both of which have repeatedly proved themselves capable of 
becoming pests of considerable importance. No adults were 
reared directly from the larve which caused the Ohio damage. 
Runner (1914) lists this species as of economic importance, but 
apparently bases his statement on the foregoing record and 
furnishes no additional evidence. Felt (1906) also blackens its 
character on the same flimsy basis, but until new evidence 
can be produced the verdict must be “not guilty.”’ 


HABITS OF THE MOTHS. 


In Tennessee the moths have been found only on lands 
which have been devoted to grass for some years, such as 
parks, permanent pastures and meadows. They occur on 
rolling, well-drained, and sometimes rather damp land, either 
open or with scattering large trees, but never on high or dry 
knolls. They do not appear to be generally distributed over 
a district, but seem closely confined to certain small areas 
varying in size from a few yards to two or three acres. During 
the early part of their season no moths occur outside these 
areas, but toward the close of their period of flight they become 
somewhat more diffused. Observations show that these infested 
areas remain the same from year to year. For some time no 
explanation could be offered for this fact but when it was found 
that the larve, especially in the early stages, can subsist only 
on certain mosses, it appears that the presence of these essential 
food plants is the factor determining both the abundance 
and exact distribution of the species. 


The moths are easily flushed at any time of day, fly in a 
rather direct line for four to ten yards and alight abruptly, 
always head up, sometimes on a broad-leaved plant, but 
preferably on a grass stem. When blue grass is present they 
often choose its more or less pendulous heads and when so 
resting are very inconspicuous. Occasionally moths which 
have been flushed several times will feign death and often 
when struck down with a net they remain motionless until 
touched. 

In our collections the males greatly predominate, especially 
at the first appearance of the moths. Apparently the males 
emerge somewhat earlier than the females and the following 


1922] Ainslie: Crambus laqueatellus Clem. 129 


record of moths taken at Nashville in 1916 by Mr. W. B. 
Cartwright bears this out: 


Date Taken Total Male Female 
Moths 
IVeiygo eee ecard ctor: 10 10 he 
WG al Gio Air cee eae 38 32 6 
Wi? Gc ba en oe optnomiaice 43 30 13 


Of the 38 specimens taken in the field in 1914, 22 were 
males; of the 118 taken in 1915, 101 were males, and of 94 
taken in 1919, 75 were males. Of the total taken in the three 
years, 79% were males. Felt’s (1894) record shows that in 
1889 at Ithaca, N. Y., 55 moths were captured in a lantern 
trap, 26 of them males and 28 females, this being the only 
one of all the species which he worked where the females 
captured at light exceeded the males. In our work no trap 
lights have been operated near where these moths were known 
to occur. None were taken at light at Nashville, and but 
one, a male, at Knoxville. We have been unable to verify 
Felt’s statement that the females fly later in the day than 
the males. 

The adults of both sexes are vigorous and live longer in 
confinement than those of most species. Eighty-four males 
collected on various dates lived on the average 4.7 days con- 
fined in dry 2-dram vials; 21 females under the same conditions 
averaged 5.8 days. In the open, under normal conditions, the 
moths of both sexes probably live much longer than this. The 
sexes are more nearly equal in their vitality than is usual in 
this group, for in confinement the males of other species usually 
die very much sooner than the females. One male lived 11 
days, which is longer than any female survived. 

The great vitality of these moths is also displayed by the 
fecundity of the females. Felt states that the species is prolific 
and we have found this to be true, in fact, this is the most 
prolific species in this genus of which we have any knowledge. 
His record of ‘‘over two hundred”’ eggs was far surpassed. 
One moth laid 868 eggs, the largest number obtained from any 
individual of any species of this genus so far. Others laid 
832, and 720, and eight laid over 500 each. The average for 


130 Annals Entomological Society of America  [Vol. XV, 


25 moths under observation was 378, an average of 65 eggs 
per day for the life of the average female. Our records show 
that the largest number of eggs was deposited usually the 
first or second night after capture with a gradual decrease in 
number nightly until the death of the moth. The largest 
number laid by one moth in one night was 455, but records of 
250 were several times obtained. All these moths were con-— 
fined in dry vials and undoubtedly died somewhat sooner 
than they would have done under natural conditions, but 
from results obtained in more extensive experiments with other 
species it is concluded that the total number of eggs produced 
would not have materially increased with lengthened life. 


The moths follow the usual habit of the genus in dropping 
their eggs promiscuously while in flight, but it seems that they 
are not so careful to await nightfall before beginning operations 
as are many of the other species. Females captured late in 
the afternoon sometimes dropped several eggs within a few 
minutes of their capture. 


The larve.—In the first two years of work with this species 
we were entirely unsuccessful in rearing the larve. Great 
numbers of active, newly-hatched larve were placed in the 
small tin boxes used for rearing other species and supplied with 
fresh leaves of bluegrass, red and white clover, alfalfa, soy bean, 
cow pea, wheat, rye, corn, timothy, orchard grass, Muhlen- 
bergia diffusa, Plantaga lanceolata and Rumex crispus, all of 
which they consistently refused to touch. Numbers of larve 
were transferred to potted plants of corn, rye, oats and blue- 
grass, but later no trace of their having fed could be found. 
The flora of the various tracts frequented by the moths was 
minutely studied in an effort to find some plant common 
to them all. In several such places the stand was apparently 
pure bluegrass. No empty cocoons or pupal shells were found 
by digging about plants where the moths were active. 
Numerous crambid larve collected from various places were 
reared, but none developed into moths of this species. 

In the spring of 1916, however, acting on a clue gained from 
another species, some of the larve were put into a box con- 
taining among other things, a bit of moss. It was seen almost 
at once that the larvze were attracted to the moss. They 
fed on it to some extent and one or two of the larve prepared 


1922] Ainshe: Crambus laqueatellus Clem. 131 


to molt to the second instar. None succeeded, however, and 
all finally died. 

The next year the test was repeated, using moss of several 
different species. The larve fed to a slight extent on several 
of them, but throve and finally matured on only one, Thuidium 
delicatulum (L.) Mitt. It is very likely that other species 
are equally as acceptable as this one. After the first instar 
leaves of bluegrass, corn, cow peas and crabgrass were offered 
them frequently and as they grew older some of the larve fed 
to a greater or less extent but without showing any marked 
preference. They continued at the same time to feed on the 
moss and some of them reached maturity without other food. 
It was plainly evident that moss is absolutely essential to the 
young larve, as we never succeeded in getting them beyond 
the first instar without it. In the later instars their appetites 
are a little more elastic, but even then they do not appear to 
thrive as well on a diet limited to grasses as when they have 
a little moss for an appetizer. 

As stated above, nothing is known of the behavior of the 
larve in the field for they have never been found under natural 
conditions. After it was found that they would feed and 
thrive on moss a number were reared from egg to adult in 
individual tin boxes. Instar records of some were kept but 
because of the small number for which the data are complete 
it is not possible to draw reliable conclusions. It is not easy 
to get accurate instar records of this species because each larva 
makes for itself a silken tube or retreat running through the 
moss mass. To search out and examine the larve daily to 
determine their condition results in the death of most and the 
abnormal development of the rest. Suffice it to say for the 
present that larve obtained from eggs laid May 17, developed 
into moths, part of which emerged in the rearing boxes between 
September 21 and 26. Others were apparently full grown 
and some in the pupa stage when exposure to an unusually 
severe frost on November 28, killed them all. The fact that 
there was such a variation in the period of development in 
this material showed that the results could only suggest and 
not prove the usual progress of events. It is evident that it 
is a very rare occurrence for moths of this species to appear 
in the fall. In several years collecting we have not known 


132 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


such a case and the only recorded instances are those reported 
above from New Jersey and Colorado. 


The egg.—The eggs when first laid are clear ivory-white. 
They hatch in 9 to 12 days, depending on the temperature. 
In one lot of eggs closely observed during the 12 days required 
for incubation, it was noted that after one day they had become 
flesh-colored, in two a pale salmon, which, during the third 
and fourth days slowly deepened to a rich salmon-red and then 
remained constant until the eleventh day. On the seventh 
day two small dark eye spots become faintly visible toward 
one end of the egg, by the eighth day they had become more 
apparent as small black points within the egg and remained 
thus until the egg darkened just before hatching. On the 
eleventh day the head and cervical plate were apparent, the 
former as a dark area nearly at the end of the egg and the latter 
as a transverse band close behind it. The dark color of these 
parts gave a purplish tinge to the whole mass of eggs. On the 
twelfth day the young larva emerged, effecting escape through 
an irregularly cut hole at one side of the larger end of the egg. 
The hole is just at the position on the egg occupied by the head 
of the larva before hatching, its edge not quite reaching the 
pole. In this species, as in several others, the egg shell con- 
sumed by the larva in effecting its escape from the egg changed 
to a bright red or orange in the intestinal tract, passed through 
as a solid plug and was voided as a brightly colored particle 
just in advance of the first excrement. The empty egg shell 
is pearly white with an irridescent lustre. 

Infertile eggs do not change color and soon shrivel. Some 
eggs color slightly and then shrivel, indicating that they lack 
the vitality to develop even though they seem to be fertile. 
As a rule nearly all eggs hatch, only the last few deposited 
before the death of the moth being weak or infertile. This 
leads to the conclusion that the female moths mate but once 
and from observations on other species this probably takes 
place shortly after emergence from the pupa. 


The pupa.—Nothing definite can be said about ihe cocoon 
or pupa. The few that were formed in the breeding boxes 
were enclosed in cocoons of silk and debris with nothing to 
differentiate them from those of other species. 


1922] Ainslie: Crambus laqueatellus Clem. 133 


DESCRIPTIONS. 


The egg. Ivory-white, elongate oval, bluntly rounded on both ends, 
one of which is only slightly the larger, with about 16 longitudinal ribs 
merging at each end into an irregularly tuberculate polar area, these 
ribs and the intervals between them crossed by other less prominent 
ridges of which there are about 18 in the length of the egg. Measure- 
ments (10 eggs measured): 


Maximum Minimum Average 
Bera Orble. hy ery tcc te acter eee 4413 mm. .4060 mm. .4130 mm. 
\WVAUG Lisle Re re Seer te Sinan Sip aie ae .3001 mm. .2648 mm. .2718 mm. 


The larva. Instar I. (Newly hatched). Length 1.15 mm. Head 
width .1589 mm. Head deep fuscous to black, cervical plate fuscous, 
body pale orange, the color heightened by the red color of the particle 
of ingested egg-shell, paler caudad. Head and body with numerous pale 
slender hairs, those on body arising from small dusky pinacula. 


II. Length 1.40, head width .2294 mm. Head black, cervical plate 
deep fuscous, body reddish brown with a greenish tinge. 


III. Length 2.80, head width .8353 mm. Head dark yellow, semi- 
transparent, unmarked, shining, ocellar area black; cervical plate 
fuscous, shining, darker than the head; body pale green prominently 
marked with transverse segmental bands of reddish brown overcolor 
giving the entire insect a dingy brownish color. 


IV. Length 3.5, head width .4235 mm. No marked change. 


V. Length 5.9, head width .5118 mm. Head clear dingy yellow, 
unmarked, ocellar area and narrow lateral margin black; cervical plate 
transparent, dusky greenish-brown with two or three dusky spots 
laterally; body reddish brown, pinacula fairly distinct especially on the 
thorax, somewhat darker than skin and rugose but not sharply defined, 
moderate in size. Sete pale and shining. 


VI. Length 7.0, head width .7415 mm. Head clear amber-yellow, 
mouth parts brown, ocellar area and marginal line black; cervical plate 
glassy, transparent and colorless except for the greenish color from 
food, a dusky spot toward either end; pinacula prominent, rugulose 
and chocolate-brown, rather large; skin finely granular, glistening, 
covered especially caudad with reddish-brown or maroon overcolor 
through which are small groups of small clear vacuoles along the lateral 
margin. At a glance the larva appears dark reddish-brown with a clear 
yellow head. 


VII. Length 10.0, head width .9794 mm. Head clear yellow with a 
row of small dusky points across the face, ocellar area marginal spot 
and line and mouth parts black; cervical plate transparent, greenish- 
yellow; body heavily covered with reddish-brown overcolor in which 
are rows of small clear vacuoles along the dorsolateral margin; skin dull, 
pinacula feebly shining and rugulose, poorly defined and indicated only 
by the character of the surface, body paler caudad. 


134 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


turcus a umbn | 
gzyathes 3 ve 
Male genetalia 


opening ane!lus 
for semymal cornulas cornufus 
: ‘ 


duct sheath 


—"Vinculum 


7 SES Male genetalia 
Male genetola Horbes 


St Aedceaaus 


O \( 

y 10) 

“A os 
ee bp 


Seital mab of larva 


1922] Ainslie: Crambus laqueatellus Clem. 135 


VIII. Length 14.0, head width 1.2126 mm. Head clear pale yellow; 
cervical plate transparent with dusky cephalic margin; skin of thorax 
pale yellow, of abdomen deeply covered with purplish-brown overcolor 
against which the chocolate-brown pinacula are distinguishable only by 
the texture of their surface. 


IX. Length 15.0, head width 1.4929 mm. Head yellow with a slight 
brownish tinge and a very faint brownish pattern, clypeus whitish, rest 
of mouth parts dark brown; ocellar area and marginal spot black; 
cervical plate clear greenish-yellow with an oval fuscous spot near each 
end; body color dusky green, darker caudad with the dense dark pur- 
ple overcolor through which on the caudal two-thirds of the body there 
are conspicuous rows of large clear vacuoles along the lateral and 
segmental lines; skin granular, pinacula large, dark purple, shining and 
feebly rugose; caudal plate dusky with dark points. For relative size 
and arrangement of the pinacula see (Fig. II, 6.( 


The pupa. Length 9.0 mm., width 2.8mm. Dusky yellow, of the 
usual pyralid shape. Spiracles small but sharply elevated. Cremaster 
broad, flattened, from above subquadrate, somewhat narrowed caudad 
with a minute pale seta at each outward angle, the tip narrowed and 
abruptly depressed, almost tubercle-like, bearing at its extremity a pair 
of larger dark sete; lateral grooves shallower and narrower than in 
most species, only moderately curved; beneath excavated. 


The adult. The following is Clemens’ (1860) original description 
slightly modified by Fernald (1896). (Fig. IT, 1.) 

‘““Expanse of wings 23 mm. Head luteous; thorax and palpi fuscous, 
the latter whitish beneath. Fore wings ochreous, with two silvery- 
white streaks separated by a fuscous streak; the outer silvery streak 
margined on costa with fuscous; the inner one, which extends beyond 
the apical third, edged on the fold with fuscous. Beneath the fold the 
wing is pale yellowish with fuscous streaks along the submedian veins. 
Apex of the wing tinted with ochreous yellow, the veins streaked with 
silvery white; on the costa near the tip an oblique silvery streak, mar- 
gined on both sides with fuscous. The subterminal silvery-white line 
much angulated, bending in below the apex, leaving a large whitish 
marginal patch streaked with dark parallel lines which end in dots 
before the terminal line. Fringes lustrous ochreous. Hind wings pale 
fuscous; fringes white.” 


The Tennessee specimens agree well with this description but are 
somewhat larger, averaging 27 mm. in alar expanse. The “whitish 
marginal patch”’ is more pale fuscous than white and the “ pale fuscous”’ 
hind wings are whitish along the margins especially toward the apex. 


Genitalia. Female. (Fig. I, 2). Anal plate wider than long, 
somewhat constricted at base, margins serrate with tubercles terminat- 
ing in long stout spines; the upper third sharply rounded and separated 
from the rest by a deep rounded notch, lower lobe shorter than the 
upper, evenly rounded above, slightly angled at lower corner. Male. 
Tegumen (Pl. XII, Fig. 3) with both body and limbs rather narrow and 
about equal in length the latter slightly narrowed mesad, and rounded 


136 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


distad. Uncus setigerous, stout, narrowing acutely distad and tipped 
with a short sharp curved tooth; gnathos naked, slender, exceeding the 
uncus, at tip widening and the margins upturned forming a pocket into 
which the tip of uncus fits when closed. Harpes (Fig. II, 5) broad 
at base, the costa of the harpes proper free but greatly reduced to chit- 
inized angular lobe extending at right angles to the base of the cucullus 
which is a broad rounded, lightly chitinized process, hairy within and 
separated from the sacculus by a narrow chitinized carina. Sacculus 
broad and almost rectangular, slightly concave, sparingly setigerous on 
both margins with a portion of the inner margin thickened and inturned 
and terminating in a small rounded lobe. Vinculum a broad sub- 
triangular, weakly chitinized area supporting the sacculi. Aedoeagus 
(Fig. II, 4) subconical, smaller and rounded at the base, flaring 
somewhat at the open end, very feebly chitinized, bearing inside about 
midway a small acute chitinous spine with a broad flat base, and just 
within the open end and projecting far beyond a huge, heavily chitinized 
curved, flattened spine longitudinally carinate at the base and covered 
with minute acute points inclined toward the tip, this spine or cornutus 
equalling in length the aedoeagus proper. The anellus is a mere mem- 
brane attached to the aedoeagus ventrad. 


LITERATURE CITED:* 

1860. Clemens, B., Contributions to N. A. Lepidopterology, No. 5, Proc. Acad. 
Naitenocia neti I22203: 

1863. Walker, F. List of lepidopterous insects in the British Museum, Cram- 
bites, pt. 27:159. 

1863. Zeller, P. C. Chilonidarum et Crambidarum, p. 24. 

1872. Zeller, P. C. Beit. z. Kennt. der nordamer u. c. achfalter, Verh. zool-bot. 
Ges. Wien. 22:538. 

1874. Lintner, J.A. Dates of collection of some N. Y. Heterocera for 1872, Ent. 
cont. no. 3:184. 

1891. Smith, J.B. List of the Lepidoptera of boreal America, Phil. p. 86. 

1894. Felt, E. P. Certain grass-eating insects, Cornell, N. Y. Bul. 64:79-80. 

1896. Fernald, C. H. Crambidae of N. A., Sp. Bul. Mass. Agr. Coll. p. 35. 

1896. Fyles, T. W. Lepidopterous pests of meadow and lawn. Ann. Rept. Ent. 
Soc. Ontario, 27:104. 

1896. Webster, F.M. Some destructive insects, Ohio Bul. 68:44. 

1897. Hine, J.S. Ohio Crambidae, Proc. Columbus Hort. Soc., 12:25. 

1898. Gillette, C. P. Colorado Lepidoptera, Colo. Bul. 43:11. 

1900. Smith, J. B. Insects of New Jersey, p. 467. 

1903. Holland, W. J. The Moth book, N. Y., p. 402. 

1914. ea G. A. The so-called tobacco wireworm in Va. U.S. D. A. Bul. 
Sid: 


*Because of the trivial nature of so many of the references it has been decided 
unwise to continue the plan outlined in the first paper of this series (Ann. Ent. Soc. 
Am. 11:51, 1918) and only literature referred to in the text is included in this 
bibliography. 


A REVIEW OF THE DESERT LEAFHOPPERS OF THE 
ORGERINI (RHYNCHOTA FULGORIDAE). 


By E. D. BALL AND ALBERT HARTZELL. 


Stal! in 1859, figured and described Orgerius rhyparus from 
material collected at San Francisco and for many years the 
relation of this species to the other members of the group 
remained an unsettled question. About ten years ago it chanced 
to be the good fortune of the senior writer while collecting 
Homoptera in California to rediscover Stal’s species and secure 
sufficient material to throw some light on the interpretation of 
the characters and classification of this aberrant and interest- 
ing tribe of Fulgoride. Collections were made covering Oregon, 
Idaho, Utah, Nevada, California and Lower California, Mexico. 

The adults of the Orgerini are wingless with brachypterous 
elytra and resemble the nymphs of winged species. They pre- 
sent a grotesque and unusual appearance in that they assume 
an upright position in walking on their long, slender legs; 
their short, stout bodies and their long, pointed cephalic 
processes together with a peculiar strut in locomotion give the 
insects a unique place among Nature’s odd creatures. The 
rostrum is remarkably long, in some of the more upright 
species, exceeding the abdomen and instead of carrying it 
inclined forward as most leafhoppers do in feeding these insects 
feed with the rostrum running down the abdomen and extend- 
ing beyond into the plant tissue. These odd adaptations seem 
to fit the insects to the hot, dry inhospitable desert regions of 
the Southwest and apparently is an arrangement to lft the 
body from the burning heat of the sands. Among the host 
plants recorded for the various species are some of the more 
common xerophytic vegetation such as Mormon tea, sage 
brush, tree Yucca and chaparall. 

In 1909, the senior? writer published an account of some of 
the material he collected from this region proposing the genera 
Timodema and Orgamara with a number of new species. In 
1913, Oshanin? published a synopsis of the tribe Orgerini of the 

1 Freg. Eugen. Resa. Ins., p. 274, 1859. 


2 Ball, E. D., Proc. Bio. Soc. Wash., Vol. 12, pp. 197-204, Dec., 1909. 
8 Oshanin, B. F., Insecta Hemiptera, Vol. 3, part 1, pp. 1-113, 1913. 


137 


138 Annals Entomological Society of America |Vol. XV, 


Russian fauna. This was followed in the same year by a resume? 
in German with the keys translated in Latin. It appears from 
the keys and descriptions that he has misinterpreted the char- 
acter of the genus Orgerius as he describes it as wanting a cal- 
losity behind the eye while he erects the genus Nymphorgerius 
for species with short angular vertices and the eyes bearing 
posterior callosities. Stal’s figure of Orgerius shows distinct 
callosities behind the eyes and our material also exhibits this 
character. Unfortunately, Oshanin had no American material 
for comparison and it is very unlikely that the genus Orgerius 
is represented in Europe. As some of the European genera 
appear to be closely related to our American genera we have 
attempted to state the differences here. 


The genus Sphenocratus Horv. superficially resembles Deserta 
but differs from the known American genera in lacking ocelli. 
Nymphorgerius Oshanin resembles the true Orgerzus but has the 
antennez placed in a large pit with the margins elevated into a 
carina. Unless we misinterpret this character none of the known 
species in North America possess this peculiarity. Hauwmavarga 
Oshanin differs from all known American genera of this tribe 
in lacking a median carina on both vertex and pronotum. It 
bears no superficial resemblance to any of our species as the 
vertex is much broader and the angles very much rounded. 
Repetekia Oshanin has the anterior femora and tibia flattened 
as in Tzmodema Ball but has the median carina of the front 
divided by an obtuse fracture. Tzmodema in addition has the 
middle femora and tibia foliaceous. Ofotettax Oshanin resembles 
Timonidia but has a distinctly different front resembling that of 
Ticidia Uhl. but may be separated from the latter genus by its 
broad head which is upturned at an angle of about 45°, while 
Ticidia and Timonidia have the head normal; also the species 
of Ototettix are not banded as are the species of Tzcidia and 
Timodema. Tigrahauda Oshanin resembles Acinaca in the shape 
of the cephalic process but differs in having the oblique carina 
running parallel to the ventral margin of the cepahlic process 
while in Acinaca the oblique carina curves abruptly upwards 
and ends on the dorsum. It also differs from Acinaca in having 
the vertex furrowed and wanting a median carina. 


4 Oshanin, B. F., Rev. Rus. Ent. Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 135-147, 1913. 


1922] Ball and Hartzell: Review of Orgerina 139 


KEY TO THE N. A. GENERA OF ORGERINI. 


A. Callosity behind eye; vertex elongate or angulate. 
B. Vertex elongate, with more than one-half its length beyond the eyes. 
C. Cephalic process truncate at the extremity. Five-angled. 

D. Cephalic process gradually tapering as seen from both top and side. 
INS ose Sra ecg tele eter OO ECR ©: Cpe ROE yo ke Orgamara Ball. 
DD. Cephalic process parallel margined; apex as seen from the side slightly 
enlarged; projecting at an angle with vertex......... Yucanda nov. gen. 
CC. Cephalic process as seen from side, beak-like, the apex obliquely rounding 
from above, the lower angle slightly produced........ Deserta nov. gen. 
BB. Vertex angulate, narrowing from the eyes, less than twice the length of 
(FES ACN eS go ore ee Sn eer aL reer, nie ee Orgerius Stal. 


the side. 
E. Vertex angulate, produced in front of the eyes at least one-third its 
length. 

. Head twice the length of the eye as seen from the side, widening 
(HOMME! HAS. WIBIMCANNS BOIS, oo acaccoesnogencoc cue Acinaca nov. gen. 
FF. Eyes contigious to pronotum; head distinctly less than twice 
the length of the eyes; as seen from the side, distinctly narrowing 
and: roundinely, truncate 5... a6 miss ee ene a Aridia nov. gen. 
EE. Vertex broad and short, scarcely longer than its basal width. The 
lateral carina of the front closely margins the eye clear to its juncture 

with the lateral margin of the vertex. 
G. Fore and middle tibia broadly foliaceous....... Timodema Ball. 

GG. Tibia normal. 

H. Lateral carine of the frontal tablet uniting some distance 


belowntne apex On tae MEAG has. seme eee as as Ticidia Uhl. 
HH. Lateral carinz of the frontal tablet narrowing but not uniting 
before joining the vertex................ Timonidia nov. gen. 


Orgamara Ball. 


Resembling Orgerius Stal but with the vertex produced into 
a long stylate process, similar to that found in Scolops, but 
stouter. 


Cephalic process long, tapering, nearly twice the length of the eye, 
truncate apically, but slightly inclined to the plane of the vertex. 
Front straight in profile, tricarinate, the lateral carinee narrowing near 
the apex but not uniting with the median. The carina from the lower 
corner of the eye running obliquely to the upper margin of the snout at 
or beyond the middle; below this carina, the front is pustulate. A 
transverse carina sets off the posterior third of the vertex; median 
carina of the vertex extending onto the cephalic process a slight dis- 
tance. Eye separated from the pronotum by an elongate callosity. Pro- 
notum with a central raised tablet, tricarinate, the lateral extensions 
sloping strongly downward and backward, pustulate. Elytra covering 
the second segment of the abdomen, irregularly reticulate; a row of 
pustules near the posterior border of each segment. Legs long, slender, 
terete; hind tibia with 5-6 weak spines. Rostrum about equalling the 
abdomen. 


Type of the genus O. acuta Ball. 


140 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


This genus as now restricted, with acuta Ball as type, 
includes two species known only from Southern California and 
Lower California, Mexico. The slender tapering cephalic 
process will at once separate them from other groups. 


Key to the Species of Orgamara. 


A. Cephalic process long and slender, nearly twice as long as the eye; the 
anterior tablet of the vertex longer than wide.............. acuta Ball 

AA. Cephalic process broader and shorter, extending beyond the eye, but little 
more than its length; anterior tablet of vertex rectangular. .reducta Ball 


Orgamara acuta Ball. 
(Plate XII, Figs. 12, 14, 16.) 
Orgamara acuta Ball. Proc. Bio. Soc. Wash., Vol. XXII, p. 198, Dec., 1909. 

A short-winged, dark fuscous species with an extremely 
long and slender cephalic process. Length 5-6 mm. 

Cephalic process long and slender more than twice as long as the 
eye. The oblique carina meeting the margin of the cephalic process 
about one-third the distance from the apex. Anterior tablet of the 
vertex slightly longer than wide. The front narrow, elongate, over 
one-half its length beyond the median line of the eyes. 

Color—Brownish fuscous, pronotum much lighter than scutellum. 
Irregular reticulations on the elytra and about four irregular stripes on 
the abdomen, lighter. Whole insect with a coppery reflection along the 
median line. Face uniformly brown. 


This species is strikingly distinct from all others in the 
group and may be recognized by its long, slender, pointed 
cephalic process. Specimens are at hand from the region of 
San Diego, California, and adjacent portions of Mexico. Sol- 
itary individuals have been taken from the middle of June until 
early August. They occur in open spaces in the chaparall, two 
of them were beaten from Arctostaphylos but this may have 
been accidental. 


Orgamara reducta Ball. 
Orgamara reducta Ball. Proc. Bio. Soc. Wash., Vol. XXII, p. 198, Dec., 1909. 

Resembling O. acuta, slightly smaller, paler, with a shorter 
cephalic process. Length 4 mm. 

Cephalic process broad, less than one and one-half times the length 
of the eye. Oblique carina meeting the dorsum at the middle. Front 
broader and shorter than in acuta, the median line of the eye bisecting 
its length. 

Color—Pale gray, mottled with fuscous. The carinz on the vertex, 
the central plate of the pronotum, most of the elytra reticulations and 
four interrupted stripes on the abdomen creamy white. Front pale, 
shghtly sprinkled with fuscous. 


1922] Ball and Hartzell: Review of Orgerint 141 


The stouter, lighter appearance and the shorter cephalic 
process will at once separate this species from acuta. Specimens 
are at hand from the Salton Sink region of California, taken 
late in June. 


Yucanda nov. gen. 


Cephalic process long, more than three times the length of the eye. 
parallel margined as seen from the side, curving upwards at an angle 
slightly less than 45°, widening toward the truncate tip, where it is 
five-angled. Front of equal width throughout, tricarinate, the lateral 
carinee widening and the median carina elevated toward the apex of the 
cephalic process. Oblique carina extending two-thirds the length of the 
cephalic process, pustulate below. Pronotum narrow, pustulate, median 
tablet not differentiated. Eye separated from scutellum by an elongate 
callosity. Anterior tablet of scutellum raised, tricarinate, lateral pro- 
jections pustulate. Elytra abbreviated, irregularly reticulate. Abdomen 
long, oval, obese. Rostrum definitely exceeds the abdomen. Legs long, 
slender; hind tibia with 4-5 weak spines. 

This genus is readily distinguished from Orgamara by its 


curved and apically truncate cephalic process. 
Type of genus Orgamara albida Ball. 


Yucanda albida Ball. 
(Plate Mies 272) 
Orgamara albida Ball. Proc. Bio. Soc. Wash., Vol. XXII, p. 200, Dec., 1909. 
A large globose creamy yellow species with a long curved 
cephalic process. Length 6-7 mm. 
Structure of the genus, pale creamy yellow, the eyes, lateral carina, 
the antenne, fore and middle tibia and the tip of the rostrum brownish. 
This strikingly distinct species in both color and structure 
lives, both nymph and adult, upon the tree Yucca (Yucca 
baccata) of the Mojava desert region. These insects hide between 
the bases of the sword-like leaves where they are practically 
inaccessible except to vigorous beating with a heavy club. 
Adults were abundant together with a few large larve June 15 
indicating that a brood was just maturing, while on another 
visit July 30 but one or two old adults could be found. 


Deserta nov. gen. 


Intermediate between Yucanda and Orgamara but with 
the apex of the cephalic process beaked. 


Cephalic process moderately long, very nearly parallel margined to 
just before the apex where it rounds over to the acute and slightly pro- 


142 Annals Entomological Society of America |Vol. XV, 


duced lower angle which is curved down like the beak of a raptorial 
bird, the extremity triangular. Front broad and nearly parallel, the 
lateral carinze widening toward the apex. Median carina of vertex 
extending the full length of the cephalic process. Central tablet of 
pronotum distinct. A definite oval or slightly oblique callosity behind 
the eye, separating it from the pronotum. The elytra brachypterous, 
irregularly reticulate. Legs simple; hind tibia with 7 strong spines. 


Type of the genus Orgamara bipunctata Ball. 


This group is distributed from southern Idaho to Mexico 
between the Wasatch and Sierra Nevada Mountains and 
extending across the latter range in Southern California. All 
the species of this group have been taken from sage brush 
regions and most of them have been beaten directly from 
species of Artemesia. 


Key to the Species of Deserta. 


A. Part of the front above the center of the eyes twice as long as that below. 
B. Cephalic process as seen from above extending beyond eye less than 
twice the length of the eye. Lower angle of anal tube of male more 
than one and one-half times the dorsal length of the tube, broadly 
expanded and curved down to meet the long, narrow plates. 
obscura Ball 
BB. Cephalic process more than twice as long as the eye. Lower angle of 


anal tube of male narrower and less produced....... bipunctata Ball 
AA. Part of the front above the center of the eyes equalling that below. 
obesa Ball 


Deserta obscura Ball. 
(Plate XII, Figs. 4, 11.) 
Orgamara obscura Ball. Proc. Bio. Soc. Wash., Vol. XXII, p. 200, Dec., 1909. 


Resembling bipunctata, darker with a shorter cephalic 
process. Length, females, 6 mm.; males, 5 mm. Ashy gray 
with a curved and slightly hooked process. 


Cephalic process shorter and stouter than in bipunctata. Front 
with the median tablet expanded before the apex, rounding above. 
Part above the center of the eyes one-half longer than that below. 
Color—white, finely sprinkled with dark points, giving the insect an 
ashy gray appearance. Front greenish, the clypeus rusty orange. 

Genitalia——Lower half of anal tube in the male extended over one 
and one-half times the median length of the tube, broadly expanded 
and curved down to meet the margins of the long, narrow plates. 
Surface of the lower half furrowed and covered with coarse hairs. 


This species has been taken on sage brush (Artemesia 
tridentata) at Nampa, Idaho, Wells, Nevada, Marysvale and 


Chadburn’s, Utah, and Doyle and Chilcoot, California. Collec- 
tions have been made all around this area, without finding the 


1922] Ball and Hartzell: Review of Orgerint 143 


species; it therefore appears to be confined to the State of 
Nevada and a narrow fringe of the adjoining states and only on 
the higher levels where sage brush grows. Nymphs and adults 
were found during July at the lower levels, adults were nearly 
all out by July 20 but in the mountains nymphs were still pres- 
ent up to early August, while adults were taken up until the 
last of the month. 


Deserta bipunctata Ball. 
Orgamara bipunctata Ball. Proc. Bio. Soc. Wash., Vol. XXII, p. 199, Dec., 1909. 

Resembling obscura but with a longer, slimmer, less inclined 
cephalic process about twice the length of the eye and lighter in 
color. Length, female, 6 mm.; male 5 mm. 

Front with the central raised tablet distinctly narrowing before 
the eyes, then parallel margined to the clypeus. The part of the front 
above the center of the eyes almost double that below. Elytra shorter 
than in obesa, slightly abbreviated, truncate. Color—Variable, but 
usually a dull fuscous, finely irrorate with fuscous brown. 

Examples are at hand from St. George, Utah, and Ravenna, 
California, probably on A. tridentata. 


Deserta obesa Ball. 

Orgamara obesa Ball. Proc. Bio. Soc. Wash., Vol. XXII, p. 199, Dec., 1909. 

Resembling bipunctata but smaller with a shorter, blunter 
cephalic process upturned at a sharper angle, slightly less than 
45°. Length, female, 6 mm.; male, 5 mm. 

Cephalic process slightly more than once the length of the eye. 
Elytra short, the inner angles broadly rounding. Front parallel mar- 
gined, part above eyes but little larger than that below. 

_ Color—Pale straw, with a dirty orange cast. Nervures of the elytra 

with the cells smoky, the nervures of a pale straw color. 

This species has been taken at American Fork and Parowan, 
Utah, from sage brush in July and August. 


Orgerius Stal. 
Resembling Deserta, but with a broader, shorter, distinctly 
triangular cephalic process. 


Cephalic process short, broad at the base, tapering to an angular or 
slightly conical point, not truncate. The lateral carine of the front 
rounding into the median carina at the apex of the cephalic process. 
Oblique carina curving upwards from the eye, pustulate below; median 
carina extending to the apex. Eye separated from the pronotum by a 
diamond-shaped callosity. The anterior margin of the lateral tablets 


144 Annals Entomological Society of America |Vol. XV, 


of pronotum transverse instead of inclined posteriorly as in Deserta. 
Carine of scutellum sharply defined. Elytra brachypterous, irregularly 
reticulate. Abdomen obese, oval. Rostrum equalling the abdomen. 
Anterior femora expanded three times the width of the tibia; post tibia 
flattened, inclined to be serrate, the serrations crowned with 6-8 black 
spines. 

This genus was described by Stal for O. rhyparus from San 
Francisco. Oshanin, 1913, in a review of the group evidently 
misinterpreted the character of the genus as he describes 
Orgerius as wanting a callosity behind the eye, while he erects 
a new genus, Nymphorgerius, for species with short, angular 
vertices and the eyes bearing posterior callosities. He mentions 
a carina between the antenna and the eye, which is lacking or 
but feebly developed in our species and it is probable that the 
true Orgerius does not occur in Europe. 


Key to the Species of Orgerius. 


A. Size variable. Vertex narrow, one-half longer than its width; the hind 
tibia distinctly flattened basally, the heavy spines appearing as serrations. 

O. rhyparus Stal. 

AA. Small, pale, vertex wider, less than one-half longer than its basal width. 
Posterior tibia: not modiiednw. a. soe) ee eee eee O. minor Ball 


Orgerius rhyparus Stal. | 
Orgerius rhyparus Stal. Freg. Eugen. Resa. Ins., p. 274, 1859. 

A large, obese, globose species with a long, acutely angular vertex 
extending one-half its length beyond the eye. Vertex long, parallel 
margined or widening near the base, then acutely angular, the apex 
slightly rounding, the lateral carine strongly foliaceous. Face in profile 
slightly dished, forming with the vertex an acute angle. Median tablet 
narrow, parallel margined, about equalling the width of the eye. 


This species appears to be extremely variable in size and 
color and is best characterized under its varieties; It was 
described by Stal from specimens from San Francisco and has 
been found to extend from Oregon to Mexico, west of the 
sierra Nevada range. The larve appear in May and June, the 
adults in June and July. They are found in bare places in dry, 
exposed situations. 


Key to Varteties. 


A. Large, obese forms, partly rufous or testaceous. 
Be Species) entirelys nulo-testaceouspes ss aatn aerate var. rhyparus Stal. 
BIB Rutouss wat beelyjtray black aaa en riee e ie eee clitellus n. var. 
AA. Without reddish shade.- 
C. Uniformly fuscous, size variable. 
D. Large, obese, females, 5 mm. or longer...... concordus n. var. 
DD small: females nm won| CSSoeerecee eres pajaronius n. var. 
CC. Uniformly pale or fuscous and pale, small.......... ventosus n. Var. 


1922] Ball and Hartzell: Review of Orgerint 145. 


Variety rhyparus Stal. 
(Plate Xl, Figs15): 

This variety is characterized by its rather uniform testaceous color 
and appears to be one of the rarer forms. It has been found in the 
foothills around the Sacramento and San Jauquin valleys and extending 
over the range towards the Salton Sink as far as Cabazon. 


Variety clitellus n. var. 


Resembling var. rhyparus, large, obese forms with a testaceous color 
sharply set off by the shining black elytra. 

Described from three examples from Santa Margarita, Chico 
and Colfax, California. This variety was found with the pre- 
ceding and appears to be a still rarer adaptation to these dry, 
hot situations. 


Variety concordus n. var. 


Large, obese form with the females averaging from 5-6 mm., uni- 
form dull fuscous above, with a slightly pearl-gray sheen. 

Described from two pairs from Cabazon, California, and 
Wie fiwana, Mexico. " This is the common variety in southern 
California extending from Visalia and Cabazon south and west 
to Ti Juana, Mexico. 


Variety pajaronius n. var. 


Small, rather slender, female not over 4 mm. in length, resembling 
concordus above but much smaller and with the face much more fre- 
quently transversely banded with light. 


Described from two pairs from Salinas and Watconville 
California. This variety occurs on the Coast Range from the 
Salinas Valley north to San Francisco and a pair were taken on 
the eastern slope of the Sierra Nevadas near Le Grande, Oregon. 


Variety ventosus n. var. 


Resembling pajaronius in size and form, dimorphic in color, the 
female mottled fuscous and white, the central tablets of the pronotum 
and scutellum almost creamy, the face trifasciate with light. Male 
clear yellowish-white with a few fuscous spots on the lateral carinz of 
the vertex. 


Described from three pairs from Mojava, California, taken 
July 30. This peculiar form appears to be strictly confined to 
the sparse vegetation of that windy and inhospitable desert 
region. Most of the specimens were beaten from a low, spiny 
white shrub. 


146 Annals Entomological Society of America  [Vol. XV, 


Orgerius minor Ball. 
(Plate XII, Figs. 1, 6, 9.) 
Orgerius minor Ball. Proc. Bio. Soc. Wash., Vol. XXII, p. 202, Dec., 1909. 


Resembling rhyparus but smaller, paler, with a shorter, broader 
vertex, two-thirds as wide as long, the foliaceous margins rounding into 
the blunt apex. Posterior tibia normal. Length 4.5 mm. 


This species occurs in the desert region of southwestern 
Colorado and southern Utah, where it is found on the ground 
usually associated with some of the smaller salt bushes (Atriplex 


Spp.). 
Acinaca nov. gen. 


Resembling Yucanda in structure, but with a very much 
smaller, shorter and more compressed cephalic process. 


Cephalic process moderately long, strongly compressed, narrowing 
toward the apex; as seen from the side, flat and widens rapidly to a 
slightly rounding truncate apex, curving upwards, strongly inclined, 
much wider at apex than at base. The vertex is narrow, less than the 
width of the eye. The lateral carina of the face cuts the dorsum at one- 
third the distance to the apex. Median carina faint or wanting. Central 
tablet of front narrow, almost linear, tricarinate. No callosity behind 
eye, eye and pronotum widely separated. Pronotum very small, nar- 
row, pustulate, the lateral extensions only represented by a narrow 
collar, a median but no lateral carine, without a raised central tablet. 
Scutellum very small, with a single carina. Elytra brachypterous irreg- 
ularly reticulate. Pustules on abdominal segments large, prominent 
and extending only half way to the median line. Rostrum equalling the 
abdomen in length. 


Type of the genus Acinaca lurida sp. nov. 


This genus may be distinguished from any other of the 
group by its simiter-shaped cephalic process. 


Acinaca lurida sp. nov. 
(Plate XII, Figs. 8, 10.) 


A small, globose, highly ornamented green and brown 
species with a compressed cephalic process. Length, females, 
o min <. males, 2: o0nata, 


Cephalic process slightly longer than the eye, roundingly truncate; 
its tip about five times as deep as wide. Vertex a narrow, slightly 
widening strip between the large round eyes. Dorsum of cephalic 
process long, triangular, equalling the vertex, inclined upwards at an 
angle of 45°. Front elongate, widening below the eyes which are slightly 
above the middle. Frontal tablet very narrow, almost linear, strongly 


1922] Ball and Hartzell: Review of Orgerint 147 


inflated just above the eyes. Pronotum scarcely more than half as long 
as the diameter of eye, sloping irregularly backwards to a mere collar. 
Scutellum very small without a defined tablet. 

Color—Bright testaceous with the head and pronotum a bright 
green. A belt covering most of the elytra deepening anteriorly and 
encircling the insect below just back of antennz, dark shining brown to 
black. The lateral carineze, median carina of the front and the margins 
of the truncate cephalic process black-lined. Fore and middle tibia 
lineate with light. 


Described from three pairs from Mojava, California, taken 
July 30, 1912. Other examples are at hand from Ravenna, Cal- 
ifornia. This striking and easily recognized species was taken 
only on one of the chaparall bushes, Eriogonum fasciculatum, 
of the deserts and dry mountain slopes to which its color almost 
perfectly adapts it. 


Aridia nov. gen. 


Resembling Acinaca, but with a shorter, broader, more 
rounding cephalic process. 


Cephalic process broad and short, rounding at the apex, slightly 
inclined upwards. Vertex broad, as wide as the eye, the median carina 
fades out before reaching the apex. Front narrow, with very sharply 
defined carinz; median carina of the front uniting with the lateral 
carina in a five-sided figure. Frontal tablet linear, inflated just below 
the eyes. No callosity behind the eyes, the eye and pronotum contig- 
uous. Pronotum short, with median carina, without a central tablet, 
pustulate. Scutellum with central tablet, with three sharply defined 
carine. Elytra brachypterous. Strongly reticulate. Abdomen ovate. 
Abdominal segments with a row of pustules along posterior margin two- 
thirds of the distance to the median line. Legs linear, not expanded. 


Type of the genus Orgerius compressus Ball. 


Key to the Species of Aridia. 
A. Cephalic process upturned at an angle of about 45°. Rostrum about 


equallingmther abdomen sas-s1sm- hice e eer e A compressa Ball 
AA. Cephalic process flat or upturned but very slightly. Rostrum decidedly 
lonzerat namely dom ermine city. a: + Stade Seles Ader nctick) oes A. erecta Ball 


Aridia compressa Ball. 
Orgerius compressus Ball. Proc. Bio. Soc. Wash., Vol. XXII, p. 202, Dec., 1909. 


Resembling erecta, but with a longer, narrower more 
upturned cephalic process. Length 4 mm. 

Cephalic process upturned at an angle of about 45°, slightly less 
than the length of the eye, acutely angular with apex truncate. Front 


narrower than in erecta, sharply carinated. Line through center of eyes 
cutting slightly above the middle. Vertex long, angulate with faint 


148 Annals Entomological Society of America  [|Vol. XV, 


median carina, lateral carina more sharply defined. The lateral carinz 
of the front rounding in and uniting with the median at the rather 
broad truncate apex, not joining the median carina of the vertex. 
Rostrum about equalling the abdomen. Grayish brown, abdomen 
smoky with a few irregular lines. 


Examples are at hand from Helper and Marysvale, Utah, 
taken in July and August from sage brush (Artemesia tridentata) 
growing on the sunny slopes of the Wasatch Mountains at 
elevations of 7,000 to 8,000 feet. 


Aridia erecta Ball. 
(Plate XII, Fig. 3.) 
Orgerius erectus Ball. Proc. Bio. Soc. Wash., Vol. XXII, p. 202, Dec., 1909. 


Resembling Orgerius minor, but smaller and with a rounding 
cephalic process very slightly upturned. Length, 4 mm. 


Cephalic process short, extending beyond the eye less than its 
length, rounded at the apex with a truncate tip. Front sharply cari- 
nated, narrow, the width about one and one-half times the short diam- 
eter of the eye, lateral carinee uniting with the median carina just before 
the truncate apex of head, median carina of the vertex not uniting with 
the median carina of the front. Vertex small, triangular, apex of the 
head as seen from side bluntly rounded, almost truncate, not curved 
upward as in compressa. Rostrum decidedly longer than abdomen. 
Pale smoky lined with brown; elytra dirty straw; abdominal segments 
smoky with irregular dark markings. 


Examples are at hand from Reno, Nevada, Doyle, Chilcoot 
and Kelso, California, indicating a distribution for a long 
distance along the slopes of the Sierra Nevada Mountains. The 
larve were abundant in early June. Very few adults at low 
levels while they were about equally divided on the highest 
levels late in July. They were found on the ground in open 
places. 


Timodema Ball. 


Intermediate between Aridia and Ticida but with the 
anterior femur greatly expanded, foliaceous. 


Cephalic process short, broad at the base, rounding at the apex, 
vertex tricarinate, shorter than eye, not extending to the apex of the 
head, with acutely angulate anterior margin, the median carina of the 
front uniting with the median carina of the vertex. Front broad, five 
carinate, median tablet tricarinate. Median carina of the front and 
cephalic process coalescing. Clypeus broad, distinctly tricarinate. No 
callosity between the eye and pronotum. Pronotum short without 
raised tablet, pustulate to the median carina. The central tablet of the 


1922] Ball and Hartzell: Review of Orgerint 149 


scutellum not pustulate, tricarinate. Elytra brachypterous, irregularly 
reticulate. Abdomen obese, oval. Abdominal segments with distinct 
median carina. Fourth, 5th and 6th segments with a row of pustules 
along the posterior margin for a part of their length. Rostrum equalling 
the abdomen. Fore and middle femora and tibia greatly expanded, 
foliaceous, carinated; basal part of tibia leaf-like, tapering. Hind tibia 
with four spines. 


Timodema miracula Ball. 
(Plate XII, Fig. 17.) 
Timodema miracula Ball. Proc. Bio. Soc. Wash., Vol. XXII, p. 201, Dec., 1909. 


Resembling Tzcidia cingulata Uhl. but with the anterior and 
middle legs foliaceous, slightly larger, broad and darker, pitchy 
brown or black with two white spots on the elytra. Length 
3.0-4 mm. 

Cephalic process appearing only as a rounding margin to the vertex, 
extending less than its width beyond the eye. Vertex shorter than eye, 
with indistinct median carina, anterior third angulate. The line uniting 
the frontal tablet with vertex equalling only one-half the length of the 
vertex. Front short and broad, not extending beyond the eyes. Fore 
and middle femora broadly foliaceous on both margins longitudinally 
carinated. Tibia broadly foliaceous at the base, rapidly narrowing to the 
rather attenuate apex. 

Color—Dark brown or black with a transverse line on the scutellum, 
the posterior margin of the elytra and the tips of the fore and middle 
tibia milky white, and a transverse band on the fore and middle tibia 
reddish. A transverse band of white across the base of the clypeus. 

Examples of this curious species have been found at Ravenna, 
Ontario, Pasadena and Tia Juana, California, and in Lower 
California, Mexico. They occur only on the slopes of the 
mountain sides and have been found under the dense green- 
brush (Adenostoma fasciculatum) so common in the chaparall 
of these slopes. The adults appear late in June on the lower 
slopes while the larve will be common above. A month later 
the adults will be appearing near the tops of the ridges. Even 
the youngest stages of the larve have the foliaceous legs and 
present a ludicrous appearance, somewhat resembling a crab as 


they strut about. . 


Ticidia Uhler. 


Ticidia Uhl., Trans. Md. Acad. Sc. I, p. 143, 1891. 
Loxophora Van Duzee, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila., LIX, pp. 469, 472, 1908. 


Resembling Timodema Ball but smaller, with the fore and 
middle tibia normal, linear, not foliaceous. 


150 Annals Entomological Society of America |Vol. XV, 


Cephalic process short, broad at the base, with a round apex, ver- 
tex short, as long as the eye, margins carinate. Front five carinate, with 
median tablet tricarinate, the lateral carine roundingly uniting before 
the apex of the vertex. Clypeus broad, tricarinate. The eye set into the 
curve of the pronotum, without callosity. Pronotum short, transverse, 
without median tablet, entirely pustulate. Central tablet of the scu- 
tellum broad, without pustules. Elytra brachypterous, irregularly 
reticulate. Abdomen obese, oval. Abdominal segments with a row of 
pustules on the outer margin of the posterior two-thirds. Rostrum dis- 
tinctly exceeding abdomen. Anterior and middle tibia linear, not 
foliaceous; hind tibia with 6-7 spines. 


Type of the genus Ticidia cingulata Uhl. 


Ticidia cingulata Uhl. 
Ticidia cingulata Uhl., Trans. Md. Acad. Sc., I, p. 144, 1891. 
Loxophora transversa Van Duzee, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila., LIX, p. 473, 1908. 

Resembling Tzimodema miracula but smaller and with the 
fore and middle tibia normal. A small oval species trans- 
versely banded with gray and white. Length, 3.5 mm. 

Cephalic process short, extending only slightly in front of the 
curve of the eyes. Front broad, distinctly wider than the eye. The 
single carina above the frontal tablet nearly as long as the vertex. 
Vertex wider than long, not extending beyond the eyes, obtusely tri- 
angular, posterior third with a strongly carinated margin, median 
carina obscure or wanting. Legs normal, anterior and middle tibia not 
foliaceous. 

Color—Ashy gray, transversely banded with fuscous and white as 
follows: A narrow light band across the scutellum, a broader one across 
the apical half of the elytra and a third across the apex of abdomen. 
There is a pitchy black band across the face just below the eyes, bor- 
dered below by an ivory white one. 


This species is evidently widely distributed over the desert 
region of south Utah as it has been taken at various places from 
Moab to St. George, Utah. It also occurs in a number of situa- 
tions in south California from Cabozon to Ravenna. In all 
cases it has been found strictly around open spaces in the 
desert regions. The only plant which occurs in all these loca- 
tions is the bush atriplex (A. Canescens) and it has usually been 
found closely associated with this plant. Adults have been 
captured from June 10 in hot situations to August 10 in cooler 
ones. 


1922| Ball and Hartzell: Review of Orgerina 151 


Timonidia nov. gen. 


Resembling Tzcidia, but smaller with a larger and more 
sharply angled vertex and still wider front. 


Cephalic process almost wanting. The apex of the vertex slightly 
exceeding the eyes. Vertex triangular clear to the base, median carina 
weak. Front broader than in Timodema, frontal tablet broad, scarcely 
elevated, parallel margined to just before the apex where the lateral 
carine round in and unite with the vertex. Clypeus broader than in 
Timodema. No callosity between the eye and pronotum. Pronotum 
short, without raised tablet, pustulate throughout. Central tablet of 
scutellum broadening posteriorly without pustules. Elytra brachyp- 
terous, irregularly reticulate. Abdomen oval, abruptly terminating 
posteriorly, almost truncate. Abdominal segments pustulate as in 
Ticidia. Fore and middle tibia and femora linear, not foliaceous or 
expanded. Hind tibia with 2-4 weak spines. Rostrum equalling the 
abdomen. 


Type of the genus Timonidia solitaria sp. nov. 


Timonidia solitaria sp. nov. 
(Plate XII, Figs. 5, 13.) 


A small, globose, creamy yellow species. Length, female, 
So mime, male. 3 mm. 

Structure of the genus, vertex short, about equal to the eyes. 
Roughly equilaterally triangular with the apex extending to the apex 
of the head where it joins the lateral carine of the front. Front broader 


than the width of the eye. Pale creamy yellow with a tawny tinge, eyes 
light brown. 


Described from three examples from Mojava, California, 
taken July 30, on Eriogonum fasciculatum along with Acinaca 
lurida. This species superficially resembles Orgerius rhyparus 
var. ventosus but is quite distinct structurally. It is not well 
adapted to this plant in color and it is possible that this 
occurrence was accidental. 


152 Annals Entomological Society of America  [Vol. XV, 


EXPLANATION OF PLATE XII. 


The Figures of this plate were made with camera lucida by the junior author. 


Fig. 1. Orgerius minor Ball, lateral view of head. 

Fig. 2. Yucanda albida Ball, end of cephalic process. 

Fig. 38. Avidia erecta Ball, front. 

Fig. 4. Deserta obscura Ball, head, pronotum and scutellum. 

Fig. 5. Timonidia solitaria sp. nov. front. 

Fig. 6. Orgerius minor Ball, front. 

Fig. 7. Yucanda albida Ball, lateral view of head. 

Fig. 8. Acinaca lurida sp. nov., head, pronotum and scutellum. 
Fig. 9. Orgerius minor Ball, head, pronotum and scutellum. 

Fig. 10. Acinaca lurida sp. nov., lateral view of head. 

Fig. 11. Deserta obscura Ball, lateral view of head. 

Fig. 12. Orgamara acuta Ball, dorsal view without legs. 

Fig. 13. Timonidia solitaria sp. nov., head, pronotum and scutellum. 
Fig. 14. Orgamara acuta Ball, head, pronotum and scutellum. 

Fig. 15. Orgerius rhyparus var. rhyparus Stal., head, pronotum and scutellum. 
Fig. 16. Orgamara acuta Ball, lateral view of head. 

Fig. 17. Timodema miraculata Ball, Ist leg. 


Annats E. S. A. Vou. XV, Prats XII. 


a 


o/|o 
oo °° 
220 0% 0%) 0 Pa o> 
2 9,50 
°°? 2. 9g ~ 0” OD 
© ,°0 6 
Cat 
os one 
270 20% 


Ball and H arizell, 


STUDIES OF THE LIFE HISTORY OF 
NOMOPHILA NOCTUELLA. 


W. P. FLint. 


This insect, one of the common and widely distributed 
species of the world, is of considerable economic importance, 
but for some reason seems to have received but little attention 
from American entomologists. 

In 1919 the insect became so abundant as to seriously 
damage several newly seeded fields of sweet clover on the 
Experiment Station farm:at the University of Illinois. Nearly 
every year injury by this insect is reported from some localities 
in Illinois. 

Tn 872) As S. Packard: (Ann. Lye. Nat. Hist. Nie oe 
pp. 258-260) gave a brief account of the insect. E. P. Felt 
(Can. Ent., V. 25, No. 5, pp. 129-135; 1893) gives a full descrip- 
tion of the different stages of the insect, together with observa- 
tions on its feeding habits and the number of generations 
occurring in New York. Judging from collections made in 
trap cages, he estimated that three generations of the insects 
occurred annually in the vicinity of Ithaca, N. Y. 

So far as the writer is able to learn, no detailed observations 
of this insect have been carried through, even for one season. 
For this reason an attempt was made to ascertain the facts 
regarding its life history in central Illinois. 

Nearly full grown larve were taken from the field June 6, 
1919, and confined in breeding cages in an outdoor screened 
insectary, where conditions were practically the same as in 
the field. The larve were placed in large tower cages with 
plants of red and sweet clover. 

The insect was carried through three generations during 
the remainder of 1919, adults appearing first on June 19, again 
July 28, and September 11. Larve hatching from eggs laid 
by the adults appearing on the latest date were from one-fourth 
to nearly full grown on October 30, when freezing weather 
prevented any more feeding for the season. Adults were 
noted in the field the following spring on March 21, during a 
period of unusually high temperatures. This period of warm 


154 


1922] Flint: Nomophila Noctuella 155 


weather, however, was followed by almost a month of 
abnormally low temperatures, with several snow storms and 
many nights when the temperature was several degrees below 
freezing. In cages, the first adults were taken on April 21, 
and again on June 19, August 3 and October 4. Larve from 
the last named adults went into hibernation the latter part of 
October, many of them being full grown at this time. 


Judging by the observations made during the seasons of 
1919 and 1920, four generations of the insect occur each year, 
being divided as follows: 


Hibernating larve. 
First brood pupez. 
First brood adults. 


First generation consisting of— 
First brood eggs. 
First brood larve. 
Second brood pupe. 
Second brood adults. 


Second generation consisting of— 
Second brood eggs. 
Second brood larve. 
Third brood pupe. 
Third brood adults. 


Third generation consisting of— 
hird brood eggs. 
Third brood larve. 
Fourth brood pupe. 
Fourth brood adults. 


Fourth generation consisting of— 
Fourth brood eggs. 
Fourth brood larve. 


The average period from adult to adult for each generation 
was fifty days. Females were observed to lay over 100 eggs. 
The average egg period was six days; average larval period 
thirty days; average pupal period ten days. 

So far as our observations go, they pass the winter in the 
larval stage in heavy silken cases just at, or below, the surface 
of the ground, and protected by the overhanging leaves of 
plants, bits of which are incorporated in the cases. 

Larve, as noted by Dr. Felt, feed mainly on legumes. 
The observations here recorded show that they seem to prefer 
red clover (Trifolium pratense), sweet clover (Meliotus alba), 
and alfalfa (Medicago sativa). They have, however, been 
found in a few cases feeding on blue grass (Poa pratensts), 
purslane (Portulaca oleracea), corn (Zea mays), wild mustard 
(Brassica arvensis), cinquefoil (Potentilla canadensis), white 


156 Annals Entomological Society of America  |Vol. XV, 


clover (Trifolium repens), foxtail (Setaria glauca), and in one 
instance, soybeans (Glycine histida). In this case the beans 
had been planted on clover sod, plowed up rather late in the 
spring, and many of the insect inhabitants of the field previously 
feeding on the clover had turned their attention to the 
soybeans. 

They feed in much the same manner as Crambid larve, 
making a shallow burrow in the ground, loosely lined with silk, 
and a silken tube extending a short distance from this burrow. 
The first instar larvee feed mainly on the under sides of the 
leaves, especially where such leaves come in contact with the 
ground. They work as skeletonizers, leaving the coarser parts 
of the leaves. After the third instar, the larve work on both 
the upper and under sides, and usually consume the entire 
leaf, unless the veins are large and very woody. Frequently 
the stalk of small plants, and the stems of the leaves, are cut 
off close to the ground, and the leaf or plant dragged to the 
burrow of the insect, being pulled partly within the burrow, and 
then nearly all consumed. The larve also frequently web 
the leaves lightly together when feeding upon them. 

The insect has been observed and reported as injuring red 
clover, sweet clover, and alfalfa in numerous instances during 
the past three seasons. In several cases, crops have been 
seriously damaged. 

A small percentage of the larve have been found to be 
parasitized. 

Complete control was obtained in fields of young sweet 
clover by thoroughly spraying the plants with a solution of 
arsenate of lead, used at the rate of two pounds to fifty gallons 
of water. 


NEW MOSQUITO RECORDS AND NOTES ON THE 
HABITS OF CERTAIN SPECIES FROM 
CENTRAL NEW YORK. 


ROBERT MATHESON AND R. C. SHANNON. 


Culicella (Culex) dyari Coq. 


According to Howard, Dyar and Knab (1915) this is a rare 
species, only single specimens being taken. Barber in 1910 
collected at Wilmington, Mass., at arc lights, 107 males and 
2 temales “(Dyar, Wnselass Mens.-7:30,) 1919). DBhere 1s 
recorded but a single known specimen from New York. Dyar 
collected a single larva from Tupper Lake from which the adult 
issued on August 16, 1905. 

During the past summer the writers found what appears 
to be a natural habitat of this species. Within the last two 
years there has been set aside a wild preserve of about eighty- 
three (83) acres, consisting of sphagnum bogs, marl ponds, 
wooded swamps and hills. There is a single deep pool known 
as Mud Pond and several small streams, while at one side 
flows a rather large creek. This is located near McLean, 
distant about eleven miles from Ithaca. This area lies above 
1100 ft. contour line and the highest point within the area is 
100 ft. Early last spring there was erected near Mud Pond 
a small open shelter for the purpose of protection during 
storms and to enable students to remain over night. On the 
first trip to this area (June 25, 1921) the writers found a large 
number (35) of what appeared to be a very striking, large, 
brown species of mosquito. These were all collected on the 
sides, underneath and within the shelter, both males and females 
being taken in about equal numbers. After a little study we 
decided the species belonged neither in Culex nor Aedes, but 
probably was a Culiseta. However no such species could 
be found described in Culiseta, so that our interest was aroused. 

During the summer this species was under constant observa- 
tion. Large numbers of the adults were seen in this shelter 
throughout June and July, the last large collection being made 
on July 18, (31 specimens). On September 4, no specimens 


157 


158 Annals Entomological Society of America  [Vol. XV, 


could be found. Although search was made throughout the 
summer in this area, not a single individual was obtained in 
any other location. Even sweeping failed to bring any to 
light although other species were obtained in abundance. 


As only perfect specimens were obtained we thought the 
larvee ought to be easily located in some of the nearby pools, 
bogs or streams. All these places were searched in vain, 
though numerous larve of other species were found. Dyar 
believes this species lays its eggs singly during the summer 
and they hatch the following spring with the melting of the 
snows. He states the larvae mature early and there is but a 
single annual generation. All his records for collection are 
for May, except one taken at Tupper Lake, N. Y., on August 
16, 1905, and Barber’s collection in Massachusetts, in July, 
1910. The interesting fact that only perfect specimens were 
found in our collecting would indicate either late maturing 
larve or a possible second generation. Gravid females were 
not found in the collection made on June 25, the first being 
obtained on July 9, and again on the 11th and 18th. 


The adults are sluggish, resting quietly and easily captured 
by placing a small killing tube over them. The most interesting 
observation is their non-biting habit, at least as far as man is 
concerned. Several days and nights were spent in the shelter 
during both sunny and cloudy weather, but never once did this 
species offer to bite, though it was the predominant form there. 
Contrary to Barber’s experience, they were not attracted to 
light, only two specimens being collected at the gasoline lantern 
used during the summer. About 150 specimens were collected, 
but this does not in any way represent the numbers present 
in and about the shelter. 

Our doubt as to the identity of. the species was kindly 
settled by Dr. H. G. Dyar, who exclaimed on being shown the 
specimens, ‘‘ That is my namesake, Culex dyari!” He has now 
placed it in the genus Culicella, a genus intermediate between 
Culex and Aedes. 

At the last moment, while examining larve collected on 
April 28, 1921, at Freeville, N. Y:, for student use, we found a 
single specimen of C. dyari. This location is about two miles 
from what is described above as a natural habitat of this species. 
Furthermore, a single reared specimen of which we have the 


° 


1922] Matheson and Shannon: Mosquito Records 159 


last larval skin, pupal skin and adult, was also found in student 
material collected in swampy, grassy pools at Ringwood, N. Y.., 
on May 10, 1921. This location is about six miles from the 
McLean habitat. 


Aedes canadensis Theob. 

This is one of the most common species of mosquitoes 
about Ithaca. It is generally believed that there is but a 
single generation each season, the overwintering eggs hatching 
at irregular intervals during the summer. Their normal 
habitat is woodland pools of a temporary character. The 
following observations would tend to show that there are more 
than one annual generation. 

In our attempts to secure the larve of what proved to Be 
Culicella dyart, we made two artificial pools on July Ist, in 
the sphagnum bogs at McLean. These pools were about 
18 inches square and the water was from 10 to 15 feet deep. 
These bogs were dry on the surface when the openings were 
made. About 10 days later we found in these pools young 
larvee which were remarkable on account of their blackish 
color. On July 18, nearly mature larve were found. These 
proved to be A. canadensis, not the unknown mosquito 
(Culicella dyar1t) as we had hoped. This would appear a new 
habitat for this species. The dark color of the larve was no 
doubt due to the decaying sphagnum which was eaten for food. 
The appearance of the species in these freshly made pools 
would seem to indicate that eggs were undoubtedly laid during 
mid-summer and hatched the same season. 


The genus Aedes. Group stimulans. 

Dyar (1920) has divided the genus Aedes into a number 
of groups, one of which is the stimulans group. During the 
past spring we made observations on three closely related 
species of Aedes—A. stimulans Walker, A. excrucians Walker 
(abfitchi F. & Y.) and A. fitchii F. and Y., all belonging to 
the stimulans group. Furthermore, Dyar considers each one 
of these to represent typically the three series into which 
he divides the stémulans group and around each are placed the 
known North American species according to their relationships. 

While collecting larve on April 19, in the Renwick flats, 
at the head of Cayuga Lake, a single larva of A. stimulans 


160 Annals Entomological Society of America  [Vol. XV, 


and two of A. excrucians were taken in a deep pool on open 
ground. The pool had a mud bottom covered with leaves. 
On April 21, Mr. Sibley brought in from Ringwood a great 
number of mature larve and pupe. This material consisted 
of two species, stimulans and excrucians (abfitchii). A large 
number of isolations were made, but they proved difficult to 
rear under artificial conditions. However, seventeen adults 
were secured, the last larval and pupal skin being saved. 
These were all mounted and 5 proved to be excrucians and 12 
stimulans. Of these we had 4 males of excrucians and 6 males of 
stimulans. Not a single fitchit larva was found in this col- 
lection. Mr. Sibley reported that these larvee and pupz were 
present 1n immense numbers. 

On May 10, the writers visited Ringwood and located the 
pool described by Mr. Sibley. It was the last of three pools 
situated in the woods in a line back from the roadway at an 
elevation of about 1300 feet. The first pool was covered over 
by a dense mat of duckweed and in this no mosquito larve 
were found. The second pool which is of considerable size 
and depth, is evidently a pothole and is isolated from the other 
two. Practically no aquatic vegetation was present and the 
bottom and margins had a dense covering of decaying leaves 
and mud. Immense numbers of pupe and relatively few 
larve were present along the edge and about floating tree trunks 
in the pool. None were found in the open water where it was 
deeper than three feet. The presence of such vast numbers 
was all the more surprising, as Mr. Sibley found none in it 
on April 21st. A greater surprise awaited us when we learned 
that this vast number of larve and pupe in pool number two 
consisted of but a single species—a pure culture of A. fitchit. 

Pool number three, which is similar but smaller than 
number two, did not contain at this time a single larva. It was 
in this pool that Mr. Sibley, eighteen days earlier, found such 
immense numbers of A. stimulans and A. excrucians. 

These observations are of interest in showing an instance of 
two species, A. stimulans and A. excrucians, inhabiting but a 
single pool, even though a second pool of similar character 
is only a short distance away. Then a third very closely allied 
species, A. fitchii, occupies the second pool, to the exclusion 
of the one occupied by the first two species. Another point 


1922] Matheson and Shannon: Mosquito Records 161 


of interest is the complete emergence of A. stimulans and 
excrucians at least two to three weeks earlier than A. fitchit, i. 
e., the pupal period of the former species was at its height about 
April 21, while the latter was on May 10. 

These three species proved vicious biters and were the most 
troublesome, where they occurred, during the early spring 
months and lasting well into July. 


Mansonia perturbans Walker. 

Mansonia perturbans is a mosquito of wide distribution. 
However there are only two published records from New 
York State—Rochester and Ithaca. The recorded material 
Ithaca was collected by Comstock in 1891. The writers 
have found only a single specimen in the Cornell collection 
bearing an Ithaca label, but no date. During the past summer 
this species has not been taken around Ithaca. On a trip 
made to North Fairhaven on July 3-5, this species was met with 
in large numbers. North Fairhaven lies on the shores of Lake 
Ontario and is surrounded by large swampy areas, providing 
ideal conditions for the development of this species. 

This species maintained its reputation of being a vicious 
biter. It would bite freely in the woodlands during the day. 
In the evening they became extremely annoying in and around 
the house. Their attacks continued after dark, even after all 
lights were extinguished. One of the writers was compelled 
to change his sleeping place after 10:30 P. M. to a more pro- 
tected room. This activity of the mosquito would indicate 
that this species is not entirely crepuscular in feeding habits 
as stated by Howard, Dyar and Knab. They also have a 
mean habit of attacking low down, crawling up inside one’s 
trouser legs. It might be added that these experiences occurred 
at an isolated farm house about two miles from the village. 

Swarming of the males was observed just at dusk, the 
individuals being barely discernible. The swarm was seen at 
the edge of a cattail pond, the height being from three to five 
feet. The swarm contained about thirty individuals, of which 
eight were captured. 


Anopheles quadrimaculatus Say. 
This species has always been supposed to be a common one 
about Ithaca, breeding in large numbers in the marshy areas 


162 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


at the head of Cayuga Lake. Early in the season we attempted 
to secure specimens for class use, but all collections made and 
adults reared proved to be A. punctipennis Say. This induced 
the writers to make a rather intensive survey of a considerable 
area bordering the city park located at the head of the Lake. 
A student spent a good part of his time locating pools, making 
collections and rearing adults. The writers also made extensive 
collections of larve and adult mosquitoes found in this area. 
What was our surprise to find that in all this material there 
was not a single individual of this species. The only specimens 
obtained during the season were collected in two private houses 
located on the heights about a mile distant from these marshes. 
In one house two females were obtained on August 15, and in 
November we collected two more in another private house. 

Ithaca used to be considered a malarial city and numerous 
cases of this disease occurred every summer. In talking with 
the health officer, Dr. Crum, he informed us that not a single 
case was reported this past season and scarcely any for a number 
of years previously. One case came to our knowledge last 
summer and that person arrived in the city suffering from the 
disease. This is an interesting coincidence between the apparent 
disappearance of the chief malarial carrier of this region and the 
disease. 


Anopheles punctipennis Say. 

This is undoubtedly the dominant anopheline in the Ithaca 
region. It has been taken in large numbers wherever the 
writers collected. It proved one of the troublesome biters all 
season and the larve were collected in all sorts of locations. 
In the marshes the larve occurred in large numbers in a great 
variety of pools. Roadside puddles of a very temporary 
character often contained a much larger percentage of this 
species than any other. In puddles formed by local showers 
in wagon ruts this species was generally present, showing the 
great abundance of the species. Many rearings were made 
and in all cases only adults of this species were secured. 

On the hills surrounding Ithaca it was very abundant and 
we were always sure to find them when collecting. If the human 
reservoir of malaria continued in Ithaca after the gradual 
disappearance of A. quadrimaculatus it is certain that A. 
punctipennis must be a poor host for the development of the 
malarial organisms in this region. 


1922] Matheson and Shannon: Mosquito Records 163 


Anopheles walkeri Theobald. 


This anopheline is widely distributed in Eastern North 
America, but is rarely taken or seen in collections. There are 
no records of it having ever been taken in New York State. 
On July 3, 1921, five specimens, while in the act of feeding, 
were collected at North Fair Haven. A single specimen was 
taken on August 5, at Duck Lake, while in the act of biting. 


Wyeomyia smithii Coq. 

Wyeomyia smith Cog. is well known to be an obligate 
inhabitant of the pitcher plant (Sarracenia purpurea) and 
practically all that is necessary to get the mosquito is to find 
the plant. 

Pitcher plants are well known to occur in New York State, 
but to date there have been no records published of the occur- 
rence of the mosquito in our boundaries. 

The sphagnum bogs of McLean, N. Y., contain numbers 
of pitcher plantsand during June and July, when these plants were 
examined, many of the larve of this unique mosquito were 
found in them. Only plants containing an abundance of fluid, 
as yet uncontaminated by decaying insects, were inhabited. 

The swamp lying close to Duck Lake, N. Y., is an excellent 
region for pitcher plants, where they flourish in great abundance. 
The larve of Wyeomyia smithw occur in great numbers, and 
during the middle of August, when this region was visited, 
large numbers of the larve could be obtained from the plants. 
The adults were also observed, flying amongst the low 
vegetation. 

Successful rearings were easily obtained by isolating the 
larve in vials and using the fluid from the plants as the rearing 
medium. 


ECDYSIS IN TMETOCERA OCELLANA SCHIFF. 


S. W. FRosT, 
State College, Pa. 


An examination of the literature on the Bud-moth, 
(Tmetocera ocellana Schiff.) reveals little concerning the moult- 
ing of such a common pest. In fact there has been very little 
investigation of the moulting of any of the Lepidoptera and 
especially of the measurement of the moulted head capsules. 
In response to the need of detailed study on this phase of the 
life history, the writer has assembled the following notes. 

A brief summary of the development of the subject may be 
of value. Several writers have previously called attention 
to the moulting habit of the Bud-moth, but there still remains 
an opportunity for considerable investigation along this line. 
Mr. H. G. Dyar, of the United States National Museum, 
several years ago made a valuable contribution in the form 
of a series of head measurements of the first five instars of the 
Bud-moth larve. His notes were published by Prof. M. V. 
Slingerland (1893).* Further information has been supplied 
by Prof. Slingerland in the same bulletin. Mr. G. E. Sanders 
and A. F. Dustan (1919)} in their work on the Bud-moths of 
Canada, have added likewise to our knowledge of the ecdysis 
of T. ocellana Schiff. The numerous other papers, chiefly of 
economic importance, add very little to the study. 


METHOD OF STUDY. 


This study has been divided into four parts. (1) The 
moulting process, (2) The number of moults, (8) The measure- 
ment of the moulted head capsules, (4) The shape and structure 
of the head capsules. 

The larve used in obtaining these records were hatched 
from eggs laid in confinement and were examined and fed at 
least once a day. Each larva was placed in a separate four 
dram vial with a small portion of the leaf as food. As soon 
as the moults occurred, the head capsules were removed and 
placed in individual jelletin capsules and properly labelled by 
means of colored papers according to the number of the moult. 
All measurements were made at the end of the season. 


164 


1922] Frost: Ecdysis in Tmetocera ocellana 165 


THE MOULTING PROCESS. 


The process of moulting, as in all insects, is a delicate one. 
The larva at this time is weak and helpless and very susceptible 
to injury. Nature, however, has provided ample means of 
protection during this period. The larva never moults in the 
open, but always conceals itself in some manner. Sometimes 
it may be a curled leaf with a few silken threads, but more 
often it forms a well constructed silken moulting case. This ° 
case may be entirely closed or partly open at one or both ends. 
The larva often moults within its feeding case, which serves as 
a means of protection during the entire life of the larva, but 
at this time provides special protection. As a rule, moulting 
occurs in a closed moulting case. 


The feeding case is composed of a mass of silken threads 
tightly woven together into a trumpet shaped tube somewhat 
resembling the feeding tube of the Apple leaf crumpler (Mineola 
indigenella Zell.) but is smaller and neater. The frass is 
utilized by the larva and woven into this silken tube, giving it a 
blackish color and forming a hard protective covering. 
Immediately following a moult, within the feeding case, the 
moulted skin and head capsule will be found inside the feeding 
tube. These are pushed by the larva to the end of the case 
where they become entangled with the silken threads of the 
case and are later imbeded in the silk and the frass of the 
case. 

It is possible to determine when a moult is approaching. 
Several hours or even a day before hand the approaching 
moult is indicated by a whitish membraneous area between 
the head and the prothoracic shield and a decided constriction 
at this point. The moult follows shortly afterwards. 


When ready to moult the skin loosens at the thorax and the 
old integument, including the prothoracic shield, moves off 
the posterior end of the larva. The larva frees itself by-crawling 
out of the skin. The head capsule comes off separately and 
in several cases under observation popped off about the same 
time the larva freed itself from its skin. Only a short time 
elapses from the first indication of a moult until the skin is 
shed. In one instance a larva was in the process of the fourth 
moult at 4:52 P. M., the old head capsule had worked half 


166 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


Bre, I. 


1, Larva showing first indication of approaching moult. 2, Larva in 
process of moult. 38, Larva immediately after moult. 4, Larva showing head 
and thorax fully colored. 5, Lateral aspect of head capsule. 6, Cephalic aspect 
of head capsule. 


Adf,, Adfs—Adfrontal sete. Lp—Lateral puncture. 
Adfp—Adfrontal puncture. Pi, Pe, Ps—Posterior setz. 
F—Frontal seta. Ppi, Pp2—Posterior punctures. 
Fp—Frontal puncture. Ox, Oo, O;s—Ocellar sete. 

E;, Ex—Epistomal sete. Op—Ocellar punctures. 

Ay, Az, As—Anterior sete. Soi, Sos—Sub ocellar sete. 
Ap—Anterior punctures. Gp—Gene puncture. 


L;—Lateral sete. SOp—Sub ocellar puncture. 


1922] Frost: Ecdysis in Tmetocera ocellana 167 


way off the head and the skin had worked part way off the 
body so that the prothoracic shield rested over the second 
abdominal segment. At 4:55 P. M. of the same day the head 
capsule was cast and at 4:59 P. M. the larva succeeded in 
freeing itself from its skin. 


NUMBER OF MOULTS. 


The number of moults apparently varies in different parts 
of the country. Mr. G. E. Sanders (1919)* found in Canada 
that there are only seven moults. The majority of the larve 
entered their winter quarters in the third instar, while a few 
moulted a third time and entered hibernation as fourth instar 
larve. In Pennsylvania the writer has obtained ten larval moults. 
The majority of the larve enter hibernation in the ninth instar, 
the other two moults occurring the following spring. A small 
percentage hibernate in the eighth instar. Considerable varia- 
tion may be expected where the number of instars are as high 
as in the Bud-moth. 


MEASUREMENT OF HEAD CAPSULES. 


In moulting, the head capsule and thoracic shield, because 
of their chitinous nature, retain their original shape and thus 
lend valuable characters for a study of this kind.. Advantage 
was taken of this fact and the head capsules of a number of each 
instar were preserved and measured. 


TABLE OF MEASUREMENTS OF HEAD CAPSULES OF 7°. ocellana Schiff. 


Number of Dyar’s* 
Instar head Average Average Measure- 
capsules Length Width ments 
measured 
SES chet CRS cee ORS eee 30 .142 mm. .216 mm. .225 mm. 
ANGIE Sb wir ORO OOO Ge Bere 34 .188 mm. .275 mm. .288 mm. 
SHG lage tn txt Saco eec Me ie Reece 21 .258 mm. .363 mm. .363 mm. 
AT eee re ees on. ace a ne 16 .299 mm. .436 mm. 43 mm. 
Ghee eetto eg Ro scare ci. 27 .306 mm. .513 mm. .56 mm. 
(1H clic tags ceca eateeo acento ans 28 .404 mm. AIP saabidly Nlecdogsndaaoe 
(I 6s BCT Olea SPE OR eR Ch ee 22 .457 mm. G4o;mms Ic one anak 
SiGe woe rs or rot Son 15 .510 mm. slat aan, \lsceucgocoace 
OE DWORE nA Ree ae ere earn ys ise lec 23 .517 mm. 5G) avon; lloocoereooewc 
IO kel oye mcarensttt ota Ach er elena eae 16 .629 mm. .975 mm. | 1.05 mm. 


* Cornell Bull. 50, 1893. 


168 Annals Entomological Society of America  [Vol. XV, 


SHAPE OF THE HEAD CAPSULES. 


There are certain differences in the shape of the head capsules 
that help to distinguish some of the instars. The head capsule 
of the first instar is distinctly flattened while the capsules of 
the remaining instars are rounded and easily separated. A 
comparison of the heads further show that those of the first 
seven instars are proportionally longer than broad, while the 
eighth, ninth and tenth larval heads are proportionally broader 
than long. These differences in shape, as well as the differences 
in size, aid in determining the different instars. 


REFERENCES. 


*. Slingerland, M. V. The Bud-moth, Cornell Bull. 50, pp. 1-29, 1893. 
+. Sanders, G. E. and Dustan, A. G. The Apple Bud-moths and their Control 
in Nova Scotia, Dom. Canada Dept. Agric. Bull. 16, 1919. 


HATCHING IN THREE SPECIES OF NEUROPTERA.* 


ROGER C. SMITH, » 


Associate Professor of Entomology, 
Kansas State Agricultural College, Manhattan, Kansas. 


This paper deals with the process of hatching in three 
species of Neuroptera, viz., Chauliodes pectinicornis Linn, 
Micromus posticus Walker, and Chrysopa oculata Say. The 
observations were made with special reference to the egg 
bursters. This account is therefore a brief description of the 
appearance of the eggs at hatching, the process of hatching 
and a description of the special structure enabling the embryo 
to leave the shell. This structure in the three species mentioned 
is of the same general type, but there are important differences. 
The general process of hatching in each case, as well as the 
appearance of the eggs at hatching, are very similar. 


1. Chauliodes pectinicornis Linn. 

The function of the egg burster in this species was observed 
in 1912 by H. S. Barber, who did not publish upon the subject. 
He very kindly sent the writer his sketches and photographs 
and supplied the fresh material upon which these observations 
were made. This material consisted of a large number of eggs 
deposited June 16, 1919, in confinement by a gravid female 
caught at lights at Plummer’s Island, Maryland. When 
received, June 20th, they showed advanced embryological 
development and hatched under the writer’s observation 
June 24th. 

The eggs all lay on what was the dorsum of the embryo 
(Fig. 4), the ventral side up, and with the prominent knobbed 
micropyles all pointing the same direction. When these eggs 
were ready to hatch, the two black eye spots could be very 
plainly seen each side the mid-ventral line and near the micro- 
pylar region. A little posterior to these were the very prominent 
bifid amber-colored mandibles. Furthermore, in the mid- 
ventral line between the eyes and above the mandibles was seen a 
thin chitinous carina resembling a small knife blade. This 


* Contribution No. 78 from the Entomological Laboratory, Kansas State 
Agricultural College. 


169 


170 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


was found to be the egg burster. It could be seen that it was 
bilobed, but the upper lobe showed the more distinctly. In 
this case the eggs hatched when these characters showed most 
plainly. The warmth of an electric light bulb after a cool 
night started the whole mass hatching. 


The first evidence of the beginning of hatching observed 
with a binocular was a very slight raising and lowering of the 
mandibles, effected, it is believed, by the embryo working itself 
upward then receding slightly. The upward movement was 
somewhat quicker than the downward one. The head was 
gradually advanced, thereby bringing the burster next to the 
chorion. This movement continued from one to four minutes 


Fig. 1. The egg burster of Chauliodes pectinicornis Linn. X 215. 
Fig. 2. The egg burster of Chrysopa oculata Say. XX 300. 
Fig. 3. The egg burster of Micromus posticus Walker. X 300. 


in different eggs observed. Finally the upper lobe punctured 
the chorion and a slit was cut for the entire length of the 
burster. The embryo forced the soft clypeal region through 
the opening, which caused the rent to broaden, then tear, 
almost entirely at the upper end. The clypeus was trans- 
lucent to grayish in color, so contrasted sharply with the 
chorion. The embryo forced its head through the rent, fol- 
lowed by the thorax, but the chief advance was made by the 
dorsum. When the embryo had emerged to about half its 
length, it stopped and prepared to cast the embryonic molt. 


1922} Smith: Hatching in Neuroptera val 


One could very clearly discern a little stream of silvery bubbles 
of air entering the pharynx and collecting in the intestine, 
thereby causing an observable inflation. As a result of this 
inflation in the thoracic region, together with the shifting 
forward of the embryo, the thin membrane parted over the 
prothorax in the mid-dorsal line. This rent rapidly lengthened 
to the metathorax. The larva then pushed its thorax through 
the rent, bending its head ventrad. The thin membrane 
slipped off the mouthparts very slowly. In a minute or so the 
head was pulled free and the larva rested supported by the end 
of the abdomen until the chitin hardened. After about thirty 
minutes the larva pulled its abdomen from the molt and walked 
away. This molt lay in a crumpled heap in the lower end of 
the rent. The entire process of hatching from the first visible 
movements to walking away required about forty-five minutes. 

The egg burster (Fig. 1) is a thickening and specialization 
of the embryonic cuticula* over the anterior part of the head 
in the median line. The burster proper is an inverted V-shaped 
ridge, with upper and lower lobes between which the carina 
bends outward and is beset with about ten minute teeth or 
irregularities. At the sides, the heavy chitinized parts are 
continuous with the molt, but the line of demarcation can 
generally be distinguished. 


2. Micromus posticus Walker. 


Hatching in the Hemerobiide has been observed by the 
writer in four species, viz., Hemerobius humuli, H. stigmaterus, 
Sympherobius amiculus and Micromus posticus. It occurred 
in the same way in all these species, the few differences recorded 
are probably individual. As a type for the family, hatching in 
Micromus posticus will be described. This species is one of the 
most abundant in the eastern part of the United States, and 
one of the larger ones in size. 

The chorion was observed to be entirely smooth, unsculp- 
tured, shining and irridescent. As embryological development 
proceeded, the outlines of the embryo could be readily seen, 
since the chorion was very transparent. When the eggs were 
ready to hatch, the three pairs of thoracic gray color patches 


* Smith, Roger C. The Process of Hatching in Corydalis cornuta Linn. 
Annals Ent. Soc. Amer., Vol. XIII, pp. 70-74, 1920. 


72 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


could be distinctly seen. The posterior three-fourths of the egg 
was pinkish, even reddish. In the mid-ventral line, just below 
a line connecting the eyes, could be seen the egg burster. The 
eggs lie on the dorsum with the venter uppermost. Just before 
hatching the egg burster and the general Eolors ven of the 
embryo appeared quite distinct. 

The first visible evidence of the beginning of hatching was 
certain peristaltic movements of the abdomen. The embryo 
appeared to push itself upward by means of the abdomen. 
The end of the abdomen was first pulled by these so-called 
peristaltic movements towards the posterior pole of the egg and 
as a result of crowding there, pressure was exerted at the anterior 
pole. This upward pushing, it has been observed, may con- 
tinue at intervals for ten to thirty minutes. Asa result of this 
pushing, the egg burster was closely applied to the chorion. 
As the pressure continued, the upper end of the toothed burster 
was pushed through the chorion. It is difficult to ascertain 
sometimes the exact time the burster pierces the chorion, for, 
under pressure the burster often appears through when it is 
not yet through, due to the transparency of the chorion. After 
the upper end of the burster was through the chorion, the 
upward and outward thrusts of the embryo became more 
pronounced. At each upward thrust, more of the chorion was 
cut, the cutting proceeding away from the micropyle. By this 
time the clypeal region of the head of the embryo could be 
seenin the rent. It was dull and whitish in contrast to the shining 
glassy chorion. The burster cut to its full length, and in the 
meanwhile the embryo pushed its head through the upper 
part of the rent. This is followed by the thorax and a part 
of the abdomen. At the time that the thorax was well out, the 
thin embryonic cuticula split over the prothorax, due in part 
to its being attached to the chorion in the mid-ventral line. 
The exact time could be ascertained by observing the straighten- 
ing up of the dorsal setee. The thorax and a part of the abdomen 
were pushed through the molt, but the mouthparts and head 
appendages were retarded so the larva formed an inverted U 
over the egg. The mouthparts were pulled from this thin 
membranous cuticula slowly and carefully. The molt with 
the attached egg burster slipped down between the labial palpi 
and the antenne. The burster and the thin shrivelled molt 


1922] Smith: Hatching in Neuroptera 173 


_ lodged finally in the lower end of the rent of the chorion. 
The larva rested until its legs would bear its weight, and then 
pulled its abdomen from the egg shell and molt. The burster, 
which is a part of the molt, could be seen with the unaided 
eye. The entire process from the first piercing of the chorion 
to walking away requires from 15 to 20 minutes. 

The egg burster is again a specialization of the embryonic 
molt, but differing considerably from those of other families 
seen. It is a toothed keel, but the upper half is free and 
extends. over the clypeal region of the head. There are no 
prominent lobes, but the apex of the ridge bears from 15 to 20 small 
saw-like teeth. There is a rather marked diamond-shaped 
cap which fits over the buccal region. This cap is thought to 
be the line of demarcation between the heavier and lighter 
chitinization of the molt. This burster apparently resembles 
that of Osmylus as figured by Hagen (1852). 


3. Chrysopa oculata Say. 


Hatching in this species, and in all closely related species 
of Chrysopide so far seen, takes place in a manner almost 
identical with that described for M. posticus. The chief 
accounts seen in literature concerning hatching in this family 
are the writings of Hagen (1859, 80) in which reference is made 
to a cephalic saw by means of which the first opening is effected. 
Hatching has been incorrectly described by several writers as 
effected by the mandibles of the embryo piercing the chorion, 
or the upper end of the egg being cut off. The position of the 
embryo in the egg would render the first explanation, a priori, 
impossible and in the case of the second there is no cap on the 
egg to be lifted. 

Eggs ready to hatch show rather clearly the outline and parts 
of the embryo, as the chorion is transparent to a considerable 
degree. The two very prominent eyes or ocellar fields stand 
out clearly and can be seen with the unaided eye. On the 
ventral side in the mid-dorsal line between the eyes can be seen 
a short, dark line. This line is the cephalic saw of Hagen, 
or the egg burster. Just before hatching, it appears quite 
dark or black, perhaps due to an increase in chitinization. 
Hatching can be readily observed without a long wait by taking 
some eggs from a cluster for observation in which most have 
already hatched. 


174 Annals Entomological Society of America _[Vol. XV, 


A brief account of a typical instance of hatching follows: 
The embryo began a series of movements calculated to pull the 
tip of the abdomen towards the posterior pole of the egg. 
This region became crowded and the embryo pushed upwards 
and outwards slowly. The upward movement was rather 
quick and with some effort, while the downward one appeared 
to be a slipping back to its previous position. Along with these 
movements, there was some outward pressure brought to bear 


Fig. 4. An egg mass of Chauliodes pectinicornis hatching. 
(Photo by H. S. Barber, 1912). 


on the head region which culminated in the penetration of the 
chorion by the upper lobe of the burster. It was later observed 
that it is frequently difficult to ascertain if it has cut through 
the chorion or whether it is merely closely appressed. In this 
case, two whitish triangular areas appeared on each side of 
the burster, their bases next toit. The writer interpreted these 
as air bubbles beneath the chorion, the edges of which had 
been raised up in the cutting process. As the embryo con- 
tinued the upward pressure, the burster was pushed through 


1922] Smith: Hatching in Neuroptera Vy: 


Ot 


for its entire length, cutting the chorion before it. The rent 
was then torn at both ends, chiefly the upper, by the outward 
pressure of the head of the embryo. The dorsum of the head is 
pushed through the opening, perhaps aided some by blood 
pressure, and as a consequence, the slit in the chorion tore 
anteriorly to the micropyle. The abdomen was the pushing 
agency. It moved upward by a series of contractions and 
expansions, pushing the thorax before it. The mouthparts 
and legs appeared to be held by the embryonic molt so 
that they lagged behind in emergence. The chorion slipped 
back over the eyes as the thorax was pushed up and the burster 
with the molt remained at the lower part of the incision with 
the cast skin. The embryonic molt was attached to the inside 
of the chorion in the mid-ventral line just below the rent. 
Sufficient strain was exerted on this molt by the emergence 
of the embryo to cause it to tear over the thorax in the mid- 
dorsal line. The upward pushing continued and the thorax 
became arched over the egg. As the thorax and abdomen 
appeared, the sete thus freed sprang into their normal position. 
When the abdomen was well out of the egg, the larva began to 
straighten up. This withdrew the mouthparts and the legs 
from the molt. They were drawn out slowly and finally the 
claws were freed after some difficulty. 


As soon as the mouthparts and legs were freed, the larva 
raised itself erect and even bent backwards. By these move- 
ments it separated the appendages from each other, for they 
appeared to adhere slightly. During this performance and 
until the chitin was hard, the larva supported itself wholly 
by the end of the abdomen. Finally, after some ten minutes, 
the larva brought itself forward and rested on its legs. It 
then rested for a few minutes longer, after which it sought 
the stalk of the egg by which it descended to the substratum. 

Later observations show that it is not always the upper 
lobe which first pierces the chorion. Sometimes it appears 
that the whole burster is slowly pushed through the chorion 
at about the same time. Larve rest for a varying length 
of time on the egg shell. Generally is it about fifteen or 
twenty minutes, but this period may be much prolonged. 
One often sees a batch of eggs with a larva resting on each. 
The empty shells are pure white, and all have a prominent 


176 Annals Entomological Society of America  [Vol. XV, 


rent at the upper end to one side of the micropyle. The 
embryonic molt generally protrudes slightly from the lower 
end of the rent. 


The burster is a saw-toothed carina, .118 mm. long, and 
.0O29 mm. wide at the lobe. In cross section the burster is 
V-shaped, due to the broadening at the base. There are 20 
to 30 minute teeth along the cutting edge of the burster. The 
lobe generally has a sharp tooth at its tip, but not always. 
The bursters of other species of Chrysopa as far as seen are 
practically identical with that of this species, and hatching 
shows no essential variations. 


The writer has observed hatching a great many times in 
each of these families, but especially among the Chrysopide 
and Hemerobiide. At no time has the egg bursters been 
observed to fail in their critical period of usefulness. Embryos 
sometimes die before hatching, but no case has yet been seen 
where it was thought that death had occurred because the 
egg burster had failed to cut the chorion. They are highly 
efficient structures. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 
1852. Hagen, H.A. Die Entwickelung und der innere Bau von Osmylus. Linnaea 
Entomologica, 7:368-418, 4 pl. 


1859. Hagen, H. A. Ausschupfen von Chrysopa larven. Stettiner Ent., Zeit. 
20:333. 


1880. Hagen, H. A. Note on Hatching. Psyche, 8:416. 


AN EXTREME CASE OF DELAYED FALL EMERGENCE 
OF HESSIAN FLY.* 


(Phytophaga destructor Say). 


By WALTER H. LARRIMER, Scientific Assistant, 
U. S. Bureau of Entomology, West Lafayette, Indiana. 


During June, July, and August, 1920, over the northern 
portion of the east central states, with the exception of a small 
isolated area in north central Illinois, the mean temperature 
was from three to six degrees below normal and during Sep- 
tember and October for this area the mean temperature was 
from six to ten degrees above normal. Rainfall was more or 
less general in occurrence over this area, but the amount 
varied remarkably in different sections as well as in immediate 
localities. It is to be expected, therefore, that such irregularities 
in two of the most important of the controlling factors of Hessian 
fly emergence would correspondingly influence the emergence 
and activity of the fall brood of 1920. 

The emergence as observed at Lafayette, Indiana, may be 
indicated by a graphic record of egg counts made daily from 
September 23 to October 25. Fifty wheat plants of the two 
leaf stage were marked and each morning the eggs were counted 
and removed. When the plants grew to a size that was no 
longer as attractive to the female flies for oviposition as the 
smaller plants, the markers were transferred to a fresh lot of the 
desired size from a later planting, care being taken to make 
sure that these new plants were clear of eggs. In Fig. 1 the 
graph shows the daily egg record for the period indicated. 

Very few wheat plants were available for oviposition at 
the time of the first peak of emergence and the resulting 
Oviposition was of course concentrated on these few plants, 
while an almost unlimited supply of wheat was available at 
the time of the second peak on October 17. Therefore the true 
relation as to the magnitude of the two waves of emergence 
is not truly represented by the graph. However, the purpose 
is not so much to show the proper relative proportion of the 
waves as to mark the time of each. 


* Published by permission of the Secretary of Agriculture. 
177 


178 Annals Entomological Society of America  [Vol. XV, 


From a similar set of records made at Centralia, Illinois, 
by Mr. W. B. Cartwright, of the U. S. Bureau of Entomology, 
the crest of emergence of the “‘late wave’”’ at that place was 
determined to be on October 12, or five days earlier than at 
Lafayette. From these two records of continuous observa- 
tions, verified more or less by a number of fragmentary data, 
it was determined that the emergence of the “‘late wave” 
occurred in the reverse order to the normal, that is, it occurred 


sadbcataad octecad ct astasteatfastestiasasitasti 
Goee ane FrEEEEEEEE BEGa EH t | FH : io 
Sra tostectttoeiit Seereatoat cedtcti oat osttetiaat 

[| Goa 5 SERS Rees 
sESocuesecseaueal tae HH seeseseces 
SUINEEEEEECECuestLigg SRREES Rees teeecenes 
SeSeSESESECeseen jigz Sitszesteees 
SUSSEEGROGUAUEE SHU TUDSEGEEEE EDEEERE tH EEEEEER oH 
AEAGEUGRGAAYEESY a: 00 caTSESeSU{EEeeE0') QEEEeuecETE 
SUEEVEGEET (SUED) SU rs SeeeTeeaeuteceeaic sasenaaee 
| a age ae BSEHREBAReETo a bp I. 
EERSGTn came fd aaedt ed ester ceeeettce 
SES Perouse cvece ses \a ces Csecueseuene’/Ea( CUeeGGuecs 
SEGEEGGECRU SSS cock CESETEGEEET ZEESS" 50.) SUSSESHEES 
Seseeseeecdese>7sceuJEseeeee? fe eeccetec teceageace 
EEEEEEEE EERE CEE EEE EERE EERE EERE EEE EEE EERE EERE 
PPESCEEEEE EEE 
Sunesusneesesun2u0ee ou aeee" "0000 GEC0000 SESS00EEES 


Fig. 1. Graph showing Hessian fly egg counts made at Lafayette, 
Indiana, September and October, 1920. 


earlier instead of later to the southward. The following map 
(Fig. 2) indicates approximately the dates of emergence of the 
“late wave’’ wherever it occurred in the section indicated. 
From the latitude of Cincinnati southward these dates come 
within the recommended safe sowing dates and for that area 
the emergence can be considered normal. 

A study of pupation records for the beginning of the period 
will also be quite interesting. These records were made by 
frequent examination and dissection of flaxseeds in lots of one 
hundred each, only those containing either larve or pupe of 
Hessian fly being included. In the graph of pupation (Fig. 3) 
the number of pupz is indicated by the figures on the left 
and the number of larve by the figures on the right. 


1922] Larrimer: Delayed Emergence of Hessian Fly 179 


It may be noticed that the crest of the pupation curve on 
October 11, did not reach one hundred, indicating that approx- 
imately forty per cent of the larve did not pupate during the 
time covered by the graph and subsequent examinations 
proved that they passed the winter in the old summer stubble. 

During the spring of 1921, from pupation records made as 
previously explained, it was determined that pupation of these 
‘“‘hang-over”’ larva began March 17 and was practically 


*LaFayette 
INDIANA 


*Centralia 


Fig. 2. Map indicating the approximate dates of emergence of the ‘‘late wave’’ 
of Hessian fly in October, 1920. 


completed by April 10. Emergence of adults from these 
pupz began March 29 and continued throughout the month of 
April. A very few healthy larve failed to pupate, but these 
were so very hard to find in the field that further observation 
on them was not practicable. 


Pupariation is a term that it has been found convenient to 
apply to that activity by which the larve of Hessian fly change 
to the flaxseed stage, as distinguished from actual pupation. 
Pupariation records were made on the larve, offspring of the 
late wave, in order to determine the condition in which they 
entered and passed the winter. At frequent intervals 100 


180 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


specimens of fly were examined as found and the percentage 
of these larve and puparia noted. In one field, pupariation 
of these larve began on November 22, was half completed by 
December 9, and completed January 4. In another field, 
pupariation began December 2, was half completed by January 
4 and completed February 28. Pupation of these larve in 
both fields began March 18 and was practically completed by 
April 10. A very small number of larve remained to produce 
stragglers or to hang over until fall. Adults began emerging 
March 29 and continued throughout April. 


7 


\ 
by 
IS. 


bh | 
b| 
TR} 
LA 


Fig. 3. Graph showing the pupation of Hessian fly of the 
“late wave’’ 1920. 


By a study of puparia, offspring of the normal emergence 
the preceding fall, it was determined that pupation and 
emergence occurred on approximately the same dates as in the 
case of “‘hang-over’’ and “‘late wave.’’ Thus the pupation of 
larve and the emergence of adults of all Hessian fly in the 
spring of 1921 took place at about the same time, regardless 
of their origin. 


POLLINATION OF RED CLOVER BY TETRALONIA AND 
MELISSODES. 


Justus W. Foisom. 


The fact that bumblebees are important as pollenizers of 
red clover has been established by means of numerous experi- 
ments dating from the time of Darwin. Their importance in 
this respect depends, however, upon their numbers at the time 
when the clover is in bloom. Thus, in second-year clover, in 
Illinois, bumblebees are highly important as pollenizers of the 
second crop, for they are abundant in late July, in August and 
September. They are unimportant as pollenizers of the first 
crop, however, for in June the only winged bumblebees in 
existence are the comparatively few queens that have survived 
the winter, and these spend a large part of their time in the 
nest, rather than in the field. The June crop is certainly not 
pollenized to any considerable extent by bumblebees. In 
fact, it seldom yields much seed as compared with the second 
crop in the same locality. 

Twenty years ago it was taken for granted that there was 
not enough seed in the June crop to pay for its extraction, 
but since then more and more farmers have found it profitable, 
now and then, to cut the June clover for seed instead of hay, 
and have obtained from one-half a bushel to two bushels of 
seed (possibly more) per acre in Illinois. 

How is the June crop pollenized? From correspondence and 
from inquiries at Farmers’ Institutes I learned that in a few 
instances the yield of seed had occurred in a region where 
Italian honey bees were common and had been seen working on 
the flowers. Now honey bees of this race are undoubtedly 
important —pollenizers of réd clover, as’ Dr. A.-D: Hopkins 
found, and as I have since ascertained. There were, however, 
some instances in which seed had been obtained from the 
June crop in places where there were no Italian honey bees; so 
there still remained some mystery in regard to the means of 
pollination of the clover field in June. 

Mr. W. P. Flint has had Tetralonia dilecta Cress. under 
observation for several years, and has repeatedly found good 
yields of seed from fields in which this bee had been abundant. 


181 


182 Annals Entomological Society of America |Vol. XV, 


This prima facie evidence, brought to my attention by Mr. 
Flint, led me to make the following observations and experi- 
ments with the object of proving whether certain species of 
Tetralonia and Melissodes pollenize red clover or not. In this 
study I had the assistance of Mr. F. Q. Otanes, a graduate 
student, who was investigating the general subject of insects in 
relation to the production of clover seed. The species used 
in our work were kindly determined by Mr. Henry L. Viereck. 


1. Tetralonia dilecta Cress.=(T. speciosa Rob., not Cress.). 
May 19, 1921, Tetralonia dilecta was present, though not 
abundant, in fields of red clover on the University farm, Urbana, 
Illinois, and was working busily on the blossoms. The pro- 
boscis, thrust into the flower, was visible through the corolla, 
and evidently extended to the bottom of the corolla tube. 
Specimens collected from clover heads, taken to the laboratory 
and examined under a microscope, showed many pollen grains, 
especially on the mentum and the branched hairs of the mentum, 
but also on the maxillz; in fact, pollen grains occurred almost 
anywhere on the ventral aspect of the mouth parts. These 
pollen grains were indistinguishable from those of red clover. 


May 24, when the bees were abundant, a root cage with 
parallel glass sides and a cover of wire screen was taken to the 
clover field; in it was placed a solid row of clover heads in full 
bloom, and into the cage were introduced specimens of Tetralonia 
dilecta. Some of the bees set to work on the blossoms, and 
their operations were studied under a hand lens. 


It was essential, of course, to determine if seed would be 
produced by plants upon which Tetralonia had worked, and 
from which all other insects had been excluded. To this end, 
red clover plants were taken which bore heads with unopened 
buds; opened heads having been removed from the plants. 
These plants were transplanted to a large flower pot covered 
with a cage of wire screen with a mesh of one millimeter, and 
placed out of doors. In a day or two some of the heads were 
in bloom and bees were introduced into the cage. May 26, 
I put thirty individuals of 7. dilecta into the cage; a few of them 
were seen to work on the blossoms during the same day; after 
twenty-four hours, however, all the bees had died. May 31, 
Mr. Otanes put several more bees into the cage, and some of 
these also were observed to work on the flowers. The florets 


1922] Folsom: Pollination of Red Clover 183 


were then allowed to dry, and were examined for seed July 1, 
by Mr. Otanes and myself. From 789 florets (not counting 
undeveloped florets that could not have been pollenized) we 
found 171 seeds. In other words, 21 per cent. of the flowers 
had been pollenized by Tetralonia dilecta. 

As a check experiment, red clover plants with heads in bud, 
but not as yet in bloom, were planted in two flower pots, 
covered with wire cages and placed out of doors, just as in the 
preceding experiment, but no bees were put into the cages. 
After three weeks, when the heads were examined for seed, 
the first cage contained 357 florets and no seeds; the second, 
287 florets and no seeds. 

Tetralonia dilecta, abundant until the middle of June, 
became rare by June 30, but a second species of bee soon 
appeared on the scene and engaged our interest. 

2. Melissodes bimaculata LeP. This black species appeared 
July 5, was common July 7 and 12, but was falling off in 
numbers July 21. M. bimaculata, swifter of flight and more 
alert than T. dilecta, worked actively on clover blossoms in the 
field. Specimens taken from clover heads showed much 
pollen, undoubtedly that of red clover, on the mentum, some 
pollen on hairs adjacent to the mentum, and considerable 
pollen among the hairs under the eyes. 

As before, red clover plants with unopened heads were 
potted July 12, and covered with a wire cage. July 14, several 
heads being partly in bloom, I placed seven individuals of 
M. bimaculata in the cage at 2:30 P. M., and one of these was 
working on the heads ten minutes later. July 15, six of the 
bees had died. July 16, Mr. Otanes put in eleven more bees; 
and July 19, five more, some of which were seen to work on the 
flowers. In all, twenty-three bees had been introduced. 

As several bees had apparently been pollenizing florets, we 
expected to get some seed, at least; but when the dried heads 
were examined by Mr. Otanes, August 4, the 216 florets that 
were present yielded only two seeds. Thus the results of this 
experiment were negative. In a second experiment, however, 
the results were different. 

In this experiment, plants with unopened heads were potted 
and covered with a cage July 21. July 23, fifteen specimens of 
M. bimaculata were put into the cage; and July 25, sixteen more. 
Many of these bees were seen working on the flowers. 


184 Annals Entomological Society of America [|Vol. XV, 


August 12, the heads were examined for seed, and the 11 
heads present, with 293 florets, yielded 90 seeds, or 30 per cent. 

These observations and experiments are simple but con- 
clusive. They prove that Tetralonia dilecta pollenizes red 
clover to an important extent in the latter part of May and in 
June (in central Illinois), and that Melissodes bimaculata also is 
an efficient pollenizer of plants that bloom during July. 

The present summary is simply for the purpose of placing 
these facts on record; a detailed account of further studies 
being left for a future article. 


ARE THERE TWO SPECIES OF THE OYSTER-SHELL 
SCALE?* 


GRACE H. GRISWOLD. 


The Oyster-shell Scale (Lepidosaphes ulmi, L.) has been 
a subject of study on the part of the writer since the spring of 
1919. During the summer of that year, observations were 
made on the biological development of this insect on lilac. 
In the fall, while making egg counts from various host plants, 
it was noticed that the scales formed on apple trees seemed to 
differ in appearance from those on lilac and some of the other 
ornamental shrubs and trees. It was therefore determined 
to make a comparative study of the biological development 
of the insect on apple and lilac the following summer. 

Studies of this insect have resulted in the finding of three 
distinct differences between what may be called the apple 
and lilac forms: 

1. Differences in the appearance of the scales. 

2. Differences in biological development. 

3. Differences in morphological characters. 


* Contribution from the Entomological Laboratory, Cornell University, 
itthacas INE Ye 


1922] Griswold: Ovyster-shell Scale 185 


DIFFERENCES IN THE SCALES. 


The new scales formed on apple are of a uniform brown, 
while the new ones on lilac are traversed by distinct stripes or 
bands. These bands, three or four in number, are light brown 
in color and vary in width from those that are quite wide to 
those that are mere strips. The old scales on apple are of a 
very dark uniform brown, sometimes of a slight grayish tint. 
The old scales found on lilac, on the other hand, are of a very 
pale gray, sometimes almost white, and the bands can be 
distinctly seen. These differences are uniform and constant 
in all specimens. 


DIFFERENCES IN THE BIOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. 


During 1919, 1920, and 1921, careful observations were 
made on the biological development of the insects on lilac. 
In 1920 and 1921 the biological development of the insects on 
apple was also studied. The differences in the development of 
the apple and lilac forms are most clearly shown by means of a 
table. 


1919 1920 1921 

Lilac Apple | Lilac Apple | Lilac 
Beesihateled: eo0.5).s0-.. June 7 May 31 | June 14 | May6 | May 27 
IDES TOC Sacoidns oboe 4a eee June 21 June 16 | July 2 June 1 | June 20 
SeAGoiaisl sanollincswechuoseosocer July 17 July 8 July 29 | June 24 | July 7 
Egg laying began...........| Aug. 19 Aug.5 | Aug. 31} July 22 | Aug. 5 


It will be seen from the table that the apple form develops 
from two to four weeks ahead of the lilac form. The cold 
summer of 1920 seems to have retarded the development of 
the insects on lilac more than of those on apple, for the lilac 
insects were nearly four weeks behind those on apple in 
beginning to lay their eggs. In 1921, however, there was a 
difference of about two weeks in the development throughout 
the entire season. 


DEVELOPMENT ON DIFFERENT HOST PLANTS. 


In connection with the study of the biological development, 
some transfer experiments were carried on in an effort to learn 
if the apple and lilac forms are interchangeable as far as host 


186 Annals Entomological Society of America  [Vol. ale 


plants are concerned. Small pieces of twigs, badly infested 
with scale, were tied to clean, uninfested branches of various 
trees, each branch being then covered with a bag of fine cheese 
cloth. In every case the eggs hatched and the young larve 
crawled to the new host plants in large numbers. The results 
of these experiments were as follows: 


TRANSFERS FRoM APPLE TO OTHER PLANTS. 


Plants to which 
transfers were made 


Lilac, 
Poplar. 


Willow, 
Choke cherry, 
American ash. 
Red maple. 


American elm, 
Box elder. 


Pussy willow. 


Result 


Very successful. Many completed their development 


and laid eggs. 


Fairly successful and about in the order named. 


Some completed their development and laid a few 
eggs. 


Many became adult and started the third or permanent 


scale. 


On the elm, 2-3 became adult, then died. On box 


elder only one became adult. In both cases many 
were found to have died in the second instar. 


None were found in the adult stage. A few started 


the second scale and then died. 


TRANSFERS FROM OTHER PLANTS TO APPLE. 


Plants from which 
transfers were made. 


European ash, 
Lilac (2 places), 
Willow, 
Lombardy poplar. 


Result 


All the larve died in the first instar. 


TRANSFERS FROM OTHER PLANTS TO PEAR. 


Plants from which 
transfers were made. 


Lilac. 


Large toothed aspen. 


Result 


Many larve were found on the twigs, having died in 
the first instar. A few had started the first scale. 


Many larve formed the first scale, others died without 


any effort at making one. 


1922] Griswold: Oyster-shell Scale 187 


It will be noticed that while transfers were successful from 
apple to other trees, in no case could insects of the lilac form 
be made to live for any length of time on apple or pear. 
Although the young larve crawled on the apple and pear 
twigs, in every instance they died while still in the first instar. 
The scales made by the apple form on the new host plants 
were always of the uniform brown so constant on the apple. 


DIFFERENCES IN MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERS. 


No differences have as yet been found in the pygidial 
fringe of the apple and lilac forms. Several writers, however, 
have called attention to the variation in the number of circum- 
genital pores of the Oyster-shell Scale from different host plants. 
For example, Cockerell (1895) mentions finding specimens on 
dogwood in California that had fewer pores than are usually 
noted.on apple. Frank and Kruger (1900) give sample counts 
of these pores from apple, plum, thorn, poplar, and willow. 
Glenn (1920) also counted the pores from various host plants. 
These observations suggested the desirability of making 
extensive counts of these pores from insects on apple and lilac. 
Knowing that a study of the pores would be of little value unless 
made from a long series of specimens, approximately 550 
insects were mounted and their pores counted, 277 from apple 
and 272 from lilac. Instead of putting the data in tabular 
form, giving maximum, minimum, and average counts, varia- 
bility curves were plotted such as are commonly used by workers 
in genetics to show fluctuating variations. The information 
desired was not the average number of pores in a group, but 
‘the number of pores found to occur most commonly. 


The accompanying diagrams show these curves. The 
abscissee indicate the number of pores found in the various 
groups examined, while the ordinates indicate the proportion 
of groups in which the varying numbers of pores occurred. 
To make the curve for the posterior lateral groups of the apple 
form, pores were counted in 496 groups. These pores were 
found to vary in number from 6-24 in a group. Only one 
group (0.20% of the total number of groups examined) had as 
few as 6 pores and only one group had as many as 24 pores. 
On the other hand, 72 groups (14.51%) had 11 pores, 100 
groups (20.16%) had 12 pores, and 80 groups (16.12%) had 


188 Annals Entomological Society of America |Vol. XV, 


13 pores. In the posterior lateral groups of the apple form the 
number of pores found to occur most commonly, then, is 12. 
Therefore, speaking technically, 12 is the ‘‘mode”’ of the apple 
form. The curve for the posterior lateral groups of the lilac 
form is based on counts of the pores of 485 groups. Of these 
groups, 64 (13.19% of the total number of groups examined) 
had 19 pores. The mode of the lilac form, then, is 19. Nota 
single group of the 485 examined from lilac had 12 pores, while 
only six (1.20%) of the apple specimens had 19 pores. 


E] oeeee IB 


sl asiaae 
| He Fie. 1. 
oSS i 


o 2 4 6 6 LOM R214 Ome Om LO Nene. 24 ZEW 26) SO) de 04 
NUMBER OF PORES IN A GROUP 


PERCENTAGE OF GROUPS 


eee 
Het 


|| 
E-| 
Bo 
as 
| a a | ao 


=e] 
ep | 


Fic. 2. 


PERCENTAGE OF GROUPS 


ZAURBS {bb SeE0R88 


0 2 4 6 [Terie hs GS a ANY der fete We ile as} 
NUMBER OF PORES IN- A GROUP 


APPLE JE) | LING eopoooKe05o 


Fig. 1. Curves showing variation in the number of circumgenital pores of the 
posterior lateral groups of the apple and lilac forms. The curves are 
based on counts of the pores of 496 groups of the apple form and 485 
groups of the lilac form. 

Fig. 2. Curves showing variation in the number of circumgenital pores of the 
anterior lateral groups. The curves are based on counts of the pores 
of 490 groups of the apple form and 485 groups of the lilac form. 


1922] Griswold: Oyster-shell Scale 189 


Practically the same thing holds true of the anterior laterals. 
Here the mode of the apple form is 17, while that of the lilac 
is 22. In the case of the median group the difference is less 
marked, yet each form has its mode, that of the apple being 11, 
while that of the lilac is 13. The greatest contrast is seen in 


Fic. 3. 


PERCENTAGE OF GROUPS 


[| 
1a 
BE 
sreseees 


4 6 


2 LINCS Soe Genes 


Fic. 4. 


PERCENTAGE OF INDIVIDUALS 
Ss 


@ 

= 3 x © 
' t Li . 

; \b 

$ 3 R c) 


Tv i) 

o = 

= = 
fi 

fo] wo 

° = 

= = 


NUMBER OF PORES IN AN INDIVIDUAL 


ns LILAC SS = SR — == 


Fig. 3. Curves showing variation in the number of circumgenital pores of the 
median group. The curves are based on counts of the pores of 243 
groups of the apple form and 251 groups of the lilac form. 

Fig. 4. Curves showing variation in the total number of circumgenital pores of 
all five groups. The curves are based on counts of the pores of 210 
individuals of the apple form and 220 individuals of the lilac form. 


190 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


the diagram representing curves for the total number of pores 
of all five groups. In order to plot these curves at all it was 
necessary to place the insects in classes with respect to the 
number of pores, for example, those having 65-69 pores, 
70-74, 75-79, etc. The curve for the apple form shows that 
the total number of pores for an individual is most commonly 
70-74. In other words, the mode of the apple form is 70-74, 
while that for the lilac form is 100-104. Only five insects of 
the 220 examined from lilac had as few as 74 pores, while not 
a single apple insect was found to have 100 pores, and only 
three had as many as 90. 

A study has been begun of the pygidium of the second 
instar. This pygidium resembles, in many ways, that of the 
adult insect, though of course, it lacks entirely the circum- 
genital pores. The dorsal and marginal gland openings can 
be distinctly seen, there being eight marginal gland openings 
(four on each side) in both the apple and lilac forms. Sufficient 
material was not available for a careful study of the dorsal 
gland openings, but all the specimens examined showed more 
of these openings present in the lilac than in the apple form. 
In the lilac form they varied from 14-18, while in the apple 
they ranged from 8-12. It is planned to secure during the 
coming summer, material for a more careful study of the plan 
openings of the pygidium of the second instar. 


HOST PLANTS OF THE TWO FORMS. 


Examination of the scales and counts of the circumgenital 
pores show that insects found on the following host plants 
belong to the apple form: 

Red dogwood (Cornus alba). 
Alternate leaved dogwood (Cornus alternifolia). 


Round leaved dogwood (Cornus rugosa). 
Mountain maple (Acer spicatum). 


The biological development of the insects on red dogwood, 
which has been studied, paralleled that of the apple form. 


The lilac form was found on: 


American ash (Fraxinus americana). 
European ash (Fraxinus excelsior). 
Fringe tree (Chionanthus virginica). 
Golden current (Ribes aureum). 

Laurel leaved willow (Salix pentandra). 
Heart leaved willow (Salix cordata). 


1922] Graham: Wing Venation of Coleoptera 191 


New Jersey Tea (Ceanothus americanus). 
Large toothed aspen (Populus grandidentata). 
Carolina poplar (Populus eugenii). 

Lombardy poplar (Populus nigra, var. italica). 
Trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides). 
Witch-hazel (Hamamelis virginiana). 

The biological development of the individuals occurring 
on American ash, European ash, fringe tree, laurel leaved 
willow, large toothed aspen, and Lombardy poplar has been 
followed and. found to agree closely throughout the life cycle 
with that of the lilac form. 

In conclusion it may be said that the evidence certainly 
seems to justify an affirmative answer to the question, ‘‘Are 
there two species of the Oyster-shell Scale?”’ 


LITERATURE CITED. 


Cockerell, T. D. A. Miscellaneous Notes on Coccidae. Can. Ent., 1895, 27:259. 

Frank, A. B. and Kruger, F. Schildlausbuch, 1900, 95. 

Glenn, P. A. Forms of the Oyster-shell Scale in Illincis. Jour. Econ. Ent., 
April, 1920, 13:173-177. 


A STUDY OF THE WING VENATION OF THE 
COLEOPTERA.* 


By S. A. GRAHAM. 


The purpose of the modern taxonomist is not satisfied by 
the mere arbitrary naming of an insect. Taxonomy is more 
than that. If the worker in this field is true to the highest 
ideals of his profession he must continually strive to clear up 
some of the multitude of problems associated with the natural 
relationship of the organisms with which he is dealing, and to 
show this relationship in his classifications. 

Unfortunately valuable phylogenetic characters are some- 
times accidentally overlooked and remain in obscurity. It is 
not until we take advantage of all these available characters 
that we can hope to arrive at a true expression of phylogenetic 
relationship. 

In the Coleoptera the characters to be found in the hind 
wings are undoubtedly of considerable value, but have been 
almost entirely neglected in taxonomic studies. This is 


*Published with the approval of the Director as Paper No. 228 of the Journal 
Series of the Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station. 


192 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


perhaps partly due to the fact that these organs are hidden 
from view beneath the elytra and cannot be studied without 
relaxing dried specimens, and partly due to the fact that the 
homologies of the wing veins of this order have never been 
thoroughly worked out. It is the object of this paper to show 
in a preliminary way some of the neglected possibilities of these 
organs in the taxonomy of the group, and to show how the 
venation of the Coleoptera may be homologized with that 
of other orders. In this study a large series of wings, rep- 
resenting the most important families of the order, has been 
examined, but the work is still far from complete. 

On examining a series of Coleopterous hind wings, several 
general outstanding features are apparent. First, that there 
is a distinct type of venation characteristic of the order. This 
is remarkably constant when the size of the group is considered. 
Second, there is considerable similarity between the venation 
of beetle wings and that of other insect orders, indicating the 
common origin of winged insects. Third, that within the 
order Coleoptera there are several types of modification which 
may have phylogenetic significance. 

A study of the literature, however, fails to reveal any com- 
prehensive investigations presenting conclusive evidence as 
to the homology of the wing veins of Coleoptera with that of 
other insect orders. 


THE RELATION OF FOLDING TO VENATION. 


One of the most striking features characterizing the wings 
of the Coleoptera is the fact that they are not only folded 
longitudinally, but also have at least one definite transverse 
fold. The advantage to the insect of this type of folding is 
obvious as it results not only in narrowing, but also in shortening 
of the wings when these appendages are folded against the 
body. This brings the wings under the elytra for protection. 
This protection is particularly essential to an insect of retiring 
habits living in places where an unprotected wing membrane 
would almost certainly be torn. 

The fact that these folds or furrows necessarily follow the 
lines of least resistance between veins, usually running parallel 
with, and often very close to a vein, led Woodworth to associate 
them with the formation of veins. There is obviously some 


1922] Graham: Wing Venation of Coleoptera 193 


correlation between these two structures, but it seems to be 
more probable that folding was a modification coming after 
the development of wing veins and that the position of the 
folds was influenced greatly by the position of the veins. The 
folds naturally would follow along lines of least resistance, 
thus bringing about a mutual adjustment of position between 
folds and wing veins. 


As a rule the folds lie parallel to veins, but if the venation 
becomes so modified that a fold must cross a vein the result 
is often a thinning if not an actual break in the vein at the 
point of crossing, similar to the bulla so common in the 
Hymenoptera. The crossing of a vein by a fold is usually 
nearly at right angles in the order Coleoptera. 


TRACHEATION AND VENATION. 


In most orders of insects the tracheation of the pupal wing 
furnishes the key to the wing venation, but in the Coleoptera 
the tracheation is of little assistance. In this study the trachea- 
tion of only a few species has been examined, but in these there 
was considerable variation within a single species, (7Tribolium 
confusum). Further study may show a correlation between 
these structures in the more primitive types, but for the present 
we may assume that the primitive position of the trachee 
is probably better indicated by the position of the wing veins 
which, in some groups of this order approach very closely the 
primitive hypothetical type of Comstock and Needham. 


HYPOTHETICAL PRIMITIVE COLEOPTEROUS TYPE. 


By the comparison of a large series of wings representing 
most of the families of the Coleoptera it has been possible to 
develop theoretically an hypothetical primitive type of venation 
for this order which does not differ greatly from the hypothetical 
primitive type of the class Hexopoda as proposed by Comstock 
and Needham. The Coleopterous type is characterized by 
a single branched Sc, a fusion of R; and R, at their tips, and 
by a similar fusion of R; and M:. Also the first forks of R, 
M, and Cu are typically well toward the base of the wing. 
(Fig. 1); 


194 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


Briefly, costa, lies in the. front margin. Whe next) vem 
behind costa is the single branched sub-costa. Radius is five 
branched, the radial sector leaving Ri near the base. Re turns 
forward to the front margin, while R; fuses with R, and R; 
fuses with M;. The other veins do not depart from’ the 
hypothetical type of the Hexopoda in general; media being 
four branched, cubitus being two branched, and the three 
anals being present. 

LAMPYRIDAE £ LAMPYPRIDAE IT LAMPYRIDAE IT 


Sc R, 


Srd 
2A Citta, Cu, 


LAMPYPIDAE I 


NSS 


HYPOTHETICAL TYPE 
h x ' 


Se ie 


Fie. L. 
I. Calopteron reticulatum Fab. VI. Eros aurora Herbst. 
Il. Podabrus tricostatus Say. VII. Pterotus obscuripennis Lec. 
Ill. Chauliognathus pennsylvanicus Fab. VIII. Caenia dimidiata Fab. 
IV. Photinus pyralis Linn. IX. Hypothetical Coleopterous 
V. Photinus marginalis Lec. Type. 


COLEOPTEROUS WINGS IN GENERAL. 


It is possible that costa is not always present, but whenever 
it occurs, 1t always lies in the front margin. 

Sub-costa les in the normal position and usually fuses 

Radius 1 lies just behind Sc and is always close to the front 
margins of the wing. In some species R: is so thickened as 
to almost obscure Sc. 

The Radial sector leaves Ri near the base of the wing and 
soon branches. Re: turns forward to the margin, often fusing 


1922] Graham: Wing Venation of Coleoptera 195 


with) Ry. Rs turns backward and fuses with Ruz. In the 
majority of Coleopterous wings R; and R, form a cross vein 
between R». and R;, but the various stages leading up to this 
condition are found in species of several families, for example, 
Cerambycide, Chrysomelide, Bostrychide, Spondylide, etc. 
(See Fig. 3). In every wing examined, the radial sector is 
broken at the base and in many cases the basal part is entirely 
gone. 


ie BUPPESTIDAE v/a BUPRE'STIDAE iT BUPRE STIDAE 


iv BUPPRES TIDAE YL TENEBRIONIDAE 


SS 


WwW ELATERIDAE WaT DERMESTIDAE 


Lk HYPOTHETICAL TYPE 
. Se Rs 
aa ES 


Ra 


SIA ED 


Fig. 2 
I. Buprestis fasciata Fab. VI. Nyctobates pennsylvanicus DeG. 
II. Dicerca tenebrosa Kby. VII. Elateridae 
Ill. Dicerca divaricata Say. VILL. Dermestes lardarius Linn. 
IV. Choleophora liberta Germ. IX. Hypothetical Coleopterous 
V. Upis cerambycoides Linn. Type. 


Media is typically four branched, but in the Coleoptera 
M,;:-and Me are always coalesced so that they appear as a 
single vein. The first fork of M is near the base. Usually 
the basal part of branch M; and Msg is lost up to the medial 
cross vein so that the cross vein appears to be the base of that 
branch. The lost basal part is, however, often indicated by a 
spur or in a few cases may be present as in Buprestis fasciata. 
(Fig. 2-1). 

Cubitus is always two branched, but these may be fused at 
the tip. Three anals are typically present and the 3 A is 


196 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


almost always separate from the other two. 1 A may either 
anastomose or coalesce with Cu and seldom appears as a 
separate vein for its entire length, while 2 A is usually fused 
with 1 A at least at the base. 

The usual cross veins are found represented in the order, 
but it is unusual to find a wing in which they all occur. The 
humeral cross vein is usually either absent or obscured by the 
thickening of the veins in that region. Radial cross vein is 
almost always present. The Radio-medial cross vein is absent 
except in a single group of families of which the Carabide are 
typical. The medial cross vein and the medio-cubital cross 
veins are usually found normally. 


£ CERAMB’ 


—s 


YCIDAE T CERAMBYCIDAE IT CHRY SOME LIDAE 


CER. 
s 


c 


IX HYPOTHE TICAL TYPE 
SEE & 


2noA Std 
Fie. 3. 
I. Acaemops bivittatus Say. VI. Bostrychus bicornus Web. 
II. Tetraopes femoratus Lec. VII. Monohomus confusor Kby. 
III. Chrysochus auratus Fab. VIII. Parandra brunnea Fab. 
IV. Desmocerus palliatus Forst. IX. Hypothetical Coleopterous 
V. Donacia sp? Type. 


LINES OF MODIFICATION. 


One of the most striking lines of modification 1s to be found 
in the fusion of tips of the veins in the apical area and a pushing 
back of the primary venation toward the base of the wing. 
The veins are replaced by secondary solid thickenings or 


1922] Graham: Wing Venation of Coleoptera 197 


calosities in the apical area which often resemble veins so 
closely that it is only by the study of a series of wings that 
their origin becomes clear. The presence of these secondary 
vein-like calosities has undoubtedly led to much confusion in 
studies of the wing venation of this order. In the plates these 
structures are indicated by stippling, while the true veins are 
represented by solid lines. 

The pushing toward the base of the primary venation, as 
mentioned above, is apparent in the most primitive types of 
Coleopterous wings studied, but is much more striking with 
increased complexity of folding. The extreme of this modifica- 
tion is found in the Staphylinide, but a highly- specialized 
condition is also apparent in other widely separated families 
such as the Scarabaeide, Silphide, Nitidulide, Ipide, and 
Curculionide. Thus it appears that this line of modification 
is correlated with the complexity of folding. Increased com- 
plexity of folding is made necessary in two ways. Either by 
a shortening of the elytra as in the Staphylinide or by shortening 
and thickening of the body, thus decreasing the elytral length 
as compared with the wing length as in the Scarabaeidz. 

Along with this migration of the primary venation toward 
the base of the wing and due also to increased complexity of 
folding, there occurs a reduction of veins. Also many veins 
become broken and branches become entirely separated from 
the veins of their origin. 


PHYLOGENETIC SIGNIFICANCE. 


It is apparent that the final determination of phylogenetic 
relationship cannot be based upon wing venation alone any more 
than it is possible to base such relationship upon tarsal, thoracic, 
or any other set of characters alone. The wings do, however, 
give some hints which will undoubtedly be of considerable 
value when correlated with other characters. 


The first point which is brought out in this study is that the 
Lampyridz, using that term in its broad sense, are characterized 
by a much simpler type of venation than any other group of 
the order. The venation of this family approaches very closely 
what was probably the primitive type. This, coupled with 
the fact that the Lampyride exhibit other primitive characters, 
such as soft wing-like elytra, soft integument, a larger number 


198 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


of abdominal segments than usual in this order, elongate 
body form, and long, many-jointed antennz, would seem to 
justify the suggestion that this family may represent the 
most primitive of modern beetles. If this is true, it seems 
probable that the Coleoptera had its origin in a Lampyrid-like 
ancestral form. 

On the other hand, the Carabide exhibit a distinct and 
rather a specialized type of venation which is characteristic 
of a group of families, including the Gyrinidez, Dytiscide, 


Z CICINDELIDAE 


WT CARABIDAE 
SS 


WZ GYRINIDAE LT GYRINIDAE IX HYPO ae JCAL TYPE 
eee > = 5. 


andAqr4 Cur 


I. Ctcindela vulgaris Say. VI. Anisodactylus discoideus De}. 
II. Carabidae. VII. Gyrinus analis Say. 
Ill. Harpalus caliginosa Fab. VIII. Dineutes assimilis Aube. 
IV. Carabidae. IX. Hypothetical Coleopterous 
V. Carabidae. Type. 


Cicindelidz, and probably others. (Fig. 4). This group is 
characterized by the presence of cross veins r—m, by the per- 
sistence of the fused part of R3+R4 which turns forward to 
the margin of the wing, and by the fact that the transverse 
fold cuts through branches Re,3; and R,, leaving these veins 
in the apical part of the wing. 


The Cerambycide and Chrysomelide typify another group 
of families having similar venation. This type includes a large 


1922] Graham: Wing Venation of Coleoptera 199 


proportion of the families of Coleoptera, for example, Bupres- 
tide, Tenebrionide, Elateride, Bostrychide, Spondylide, 
Cistelide, Melandryide, Oedermeride, Pythide, Trogositide, 
Erotylide, Colydide, Mycetophagide, Mordellide, Meloide, 
and others. 

This group is characterized by the fading out of the fused 
part of Rs44, leaving a straight vein between R, and Rit * Phe 


L CURCULI ONIDAE TT CURCULIONIDAE LT IPIDAE 


7h IPIDAE Vv SCARABAETDAE 75 SCARABAEIDAE 


= 


VT SILPHIDAE WO STAPHYLINIDAE I= NITIDULIDAE 


Fic. 5. 
I. Curculionidae. VI. Osmaderma eremicola Kn. 
II. Pissodes strobi Peck. VII. Silpha inaequalis Fab. 
III. Hylobius sp? VIII. Staphylinidae. 
IV. Ips sp? (Ipidae). IX. Ips sanguinolentus Oliv. 
V. Bolbocerus lazarus Fab. (Nitidulidae). 


various steps of this process are shown in species of Ceramby- 
cide, Chrysomelide, Spondylide, and Bostrychide. The trans- 
verse fold in this group cuts off the primary venation from the 
apical area of the wing. 


We still have left a group of wings which have become so 
specialized that the venation gives very little hint of possible 
relationships and need not be discussed except to say that a 
number of widely separated families are represented. (Fig. 5). 


200 Annals Entomological Society of America  [Vol. XV, 


SUMMARY. 


1. A large series of hind wings, representing most of the 
important families of the Coleoptera, have been examined 
and the following conclusions seem justified: 

2. The hypothetical primitive type of Coleopterous wing does 
not differ greatly from the Hypothetical type proposed 
by Comstock and Needham for the Hexapoda in general. 

3. The hypothetical Coleopterous type is characterized by 
a fusion of R; with Ry at the tip and by a similar fusion 
of Rs; and Mi. 

4. The usual cross veins are typically present. 

5. Modification of the venation goes hand in hand with an 
increase in the complexity of folding. 

6. In general there are two types of modification: 

(a) A pushing back of the primary venation toward the 
base of the wing and the substitution of secondary 
thickenings in the apical area. 

(b) The reduction and breaking up of the veins. 

7. The types of venation fall naturally into four groups. 

(a) Represented by the Lampyridz which is the simplest 
type and may indicate the possibility of a Lampyrid- 
like ancestral form for the Coleoptera. 

(b) Represented by the Cerambycide and Chrysomelide 
in which R; and Ry have become a simple cross vein 
between Re and R;, and where the primary venation 
is cut off from the apical area. 

(c) Represented by the Carabidz which is characterized 
by the persistence of the fused portion of R3; and Ru, 
the presence of cross veins r—m, and the cutting of 
Rei; and Rs by the transverse fold. 

(d) A group of widely separated families where the 
venation is too highly specialized to show any 
relationship. 


NOTICE TO;MEMBERS AND CONTRIBUTORS. 


The Annals of the Entomological Society of America, pub- 
lished by the Society quarterly, includes the Proceedings of the 
Annual meetings and such papers as may be selected by the 
Editorial Board. 


Papers may be submitted to any member of the Editorial 
Board and should be as nearly as possible in the form desired as 
final, preferably typewritten, and illustrations must be finished 
complete ready for reproduction. Plates must not exceed 5x 7 
inches unless intended to fold. In general, papers to be accepted 
must be original, complete and previously unpublished and, 
except in connection with the proceedings, it will not be the 
policy to publish preliminary announcements or notes. Authors 
will be allowed fifty reprints gratis and additional copies at cost 
to the Society. 


The Managing Editor is provided with the most recent 
address of all paid-up members on record in the Secretary’s 
office for mailing the numbers of the Annals and members 
failing to receive their numbers should present their complaint 
to the Managing Editor within four months from the date of 
the mailing of the issue. After that time the numbers will 
be furnished only at the regular published rate. 


The regular annual subscription price for the ANNALS is in 
the United States, Cuba, Porto Rico, Hawaii and Mexico, $3.00; 
Canada, $3.50; other countries, $4.00. Checks, drafts or money 
orders should be drawn payable to ANNALS ENTOMOLOGICAL 
SOCIETY OF AMERICA, and addressed to HERBERT OSBORN, 
State University, Columbus, Ohio, U. S. A. 


Requests for information as to membership and the annual 
dues of members should be sent to the Secretary-Treasurer, 
Dr. C. L. Mercatr, Natural History Building, University of 
Illinois, Urbana, IIl. 


Communications relating to the ANNALS, and all orders for 
separate copies or reprints should be addressed to 
HERBERT Osgporn, Managing Editor, 
ANNALS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 
State University, Columbus, Ohio, 


CONTENTS OF THIS NUMBER. 


Brzzi1, M.—On the South American Species of the 
Dipterous Genus Chiromyza Wied.-.....-------- 
AINSLIE, G. G.—Contributions to a Knowledge of the 
Crambine. II. (Crambus laqueatellus Clemens). 
BALL, E. D., AND HARTZELL, ALBERT—A Review of 
the Desert Leafhoppers of the Orgerini (Rhyn- 
chota Pulooridae) Sipe go lig ae ar ee 
Fiint, W. P.—Studies of the Life History of Nomo- 
phile Noctuellay cue hoy ces se es 
MATHESON, ROBERT, AND SHANNON, R. C.—New 
Mosquito Records and Notes on the Habits of 
Certain Species from Central New York......-.-- 
Frost, S. W.—Ecdysis in Tmetocera ocellana Schiff. 


SMITH, RocER C.—Hatching in Three Species of 


INGHrOpterat:: ce oe si ea ere a ie acinar ne 
LARRIMER, WALTER H.—An Extreme Case of Delayed 
Fall Emergence of Hessian Fly..--..--..------ 


Fo.isom, Justus W.—Pollination of Red Clover by 
Tetralonia;and Melissodes 2.2... 23022 22 et ee 


GRISWOLD, GrAcE H.—Are There Two Species of the 
Ovyster-shell Scale? uss yee S ve eee Se ee ee 


GraHam, S. A.—A Study of the Wing Venation of 
the 'Coleopteras (02.0 So da SoS ee ee 


THE THOMAS SAY FOUNDATION 


117 


125 


137 
154 
157 
164 
169 
177 
181 


184 


A permanent committee of the Entomological Society of America, 


engaged in publishing a series of memoirs on 
North American entomology, offers 


Vol. I. Sarcophaga and Allies in North America 
By J. M. Atpricu# 


304 pp., octavo, with 16 plates. Price in cloth binding, postpaid, $3.00. 


Address, Dr. E. D. Batt, Treasurer, 


Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. C. 


Volume XV. Number 3. 


ANNALS 


OF 


‘The Entomological Society of America 


SEPTEMBER, 1922 


EDITORIAL BOARD 


HERBERT OSBORN, Managing Editor, 
COLUMBUS, OHIO. 


CLARENCE H. KENNEDY, Ass’t Managing Editor, 
COLUMBUS, OHIO. 

WM. S. MARSHALL, 

MADISON, WIS. 


‘VERNON L. KELLOGG, 
WASHINGTON, DC. . 


WM. M. WHEELER, 
Boston, Mass. 


E. M. WALKER, 
TORONTO, CANADA. 


A, D. HOPKINS, 
WASHINGTON, D.C. 


A. L. LOVETT, 
CORVALLIS, OREGON. 


S. A. FORBES, 
URBANA, ILLINOIS. 


FRANK E. LUTZ, 
NEw Yor«K Crrv, N. Y. 


FREDERICK C. MUIR, 
HONOLULU, Hawall. 


PUBLISHED QUARTERLY BY THE SOCIETY 
COLUMBUS, OHIO 


a a 


Entered as second class matter Apri 11, 1908, at the Post Office at Columbus, Ohio, 
under the Act of Congress of March 3, 1879. 


The Entomological Society of America 
Founded 1906. 


OFFICERS 1922. 


‘President P 

ARTHUR GIBSON. - ‘ ~ Eee : : Ottawa, Canada 
First Vice-President 

We ic RIEEN oS Oa toe TG ee ee St. Paul, Minnesota 
Second Vice-President 

R. A. CooLtey . : E d Bae Pen j Bozeman, Montana 


Managing Editor Annals 


HERBERT OSBORN Columbus, Ohio 


ca 


Secretary-Treasurer 
OSU METOALE AES SEMEL 8 Ry Be RS ae A rai Sn OIS 


Executive Committee 


THE OFFICERS 


AND 
J. M. Atpricn, E. M. WALKER, 


Wm. T. Davis, O. A. JOHANNSEN. 


Committee on Nomenclature 


E. P. FEtt, T. D. A. CocKERELL, NATHAN BANKS. 


Thomas Say Foundation 


NATHAN BANKs, A. D, MacGitrivray, P. P. CALVERT, 
E. B. WILLIAMSON, Wu. T. Davis, 
J. M. Avpricu, Editor. - E. D. Batt, Treasurer. 


Committee on National Museum 
HERBERT OsBorn, Chairman. 
C. W. JOHNSON, Wm. BARNES, Wu. M. WHEELER, 
James G. NEEDHAM, 


ANNALS 


OF 


The Entomological Society of America 


Volume XV SEPTEMBER, 1922 Number 3 


THE GENITALIA OF THE AUCHENORHYNCHOUS 
HOMOPTERA. 


By J. C. KerRsHAw and F. Murr. 


Most students of insect morphology consider that the 
male and female genitalia of insects are homologous, but it 
is also considered that in some groups of insects the female 
genital opening, or gonopore, is situated between the eighth 
and ninth abdominal sternites and the male gonopore between 
the ninth and tenth. So far as the Hemiptera are concerned 
these two views have never been reconciled, and the fact that 
the gonapophyses of the two sexes appear to pertain to different 
segments has been ignored, or used as an argument against the 
organs being homologous. 

Observations made by one of the authors in England upon 
Cercopide and by the other in Honolulu upon Cicadellidz 
and Fulgoroidea, agree in showing that the difference is only 
apparent and is due to development during the last nymphal 
instar. The gonopore in both sexes is between the eighth and 
ninth abdominal sternite (or at the base of the ninth sternite) 
and the three pairs of gonapophyses form the genital 
appendages. 


CERCOPID FEMALE. 

Observations were made upon more than one species of this 
family and our remarks in general apply to all, but the details 
refer to Philaenus leucophthalmus (Linn) which was the chief 
species used. 

201 


202 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


In the nymphs the sexes can be recognized in the second 
instar and it is possible that in carefully prepared specimens 
they could be recognized in the first instar. In the later 
nymphal stages they are quite distinct. 

Between the eighth and tenth sternites there is an crea 
the anterior portion of which we will call the genital area; 
anterior to this is the eighth sternite, which is well defined; 
posterior to it, and between it and the tenth, is an area which 
may represent the ninth, or it may represent the conjunctiva 
between the ninth and tenth, and the ninth may be rep- 
resented in the genital area. From the genital area arises the 
gonapophyses. 

In the female nymphs during the last instar the gon- 
apophyses consist of three pair of subangular, fairly flat 
processes reaching more than half way back to the tenth 
sternite. The anterior pair (Fig. 1, gl) arise from the posterior 
edge of eighth sternite, although at an earlier period their 
connection with that sternite is not so apparent. The median 
pair (Fig. 1, g2) are smaller and lie immediately posterior to gl, 
and as they both point backward and gl are larger than g2, 
therefore they lie beneath, or are covered up by gl. The 
posterior pair (Fig. 1, g3) are larger and hold a more lateral 
position and are concavo-convex. The genital opening or 
gonopore is at the base of g2. 

In the adult female the eighth abdominal segment is short 
but well defined. That the segment in question is the eighth 
can be demonstrated by counting them, especially on the 
dorsal aspect; the presence of the last, or eighth, spiracle also 
indicates which segment it is. From the hind margin of the 
eighth sternite arises two processes (Figs. 2, 3, gl), which 
form the anterior or ventral process of the ovipositor. These 
are long, thin and narrow and their outer basal angles are joined 
to the outer basal angles of the ninth tergite. The eighth sternite 
overlaps their bases, but the membranous connection shows 
the relationship to the posterior margin of that segment. 
The ninth segment forms the pygofer (Fig. 2, pg), the tergite 
being large, but the extent of the sternite obscure and depends 
upon the composition of the genital area of the nymph. Two 
sclerites (Fig. 2, bp) which appear to be the valvifers of 


1922] Kershaw and Muir: Genitalia of Homoptera 203 


Orthoptera, may represent the only chitinized portion of the 
ninth sternite; they form the supports of the posterior processes. 


The median processes (Figs. 2 and 4, g2) lie immediately 
posterior to the anterior processes and are represented by a 
single, median process bifurcate on apical third and grooved 
along the ventral surface. This process is joined to the anterior 
processes by a tongue and groove joint and together they 
operate as the ovipositor, the gonopore opening at the base of g2 
and the eggs passing along the ventral groove between gl 
into the puncture made by the ovipositor. The posterior 
processes (Figs. 2 and 4, g3) are large and hold a lateral position 
slightly posterior to g2, and form a sheath for gl and g2 when 
at rest. Beyond the pygofer is the anal segment (Fig. 2, 10 
and 11) which is composed of the tenth and eleventh segment. 
Beneath the anus is the anal style (Fig. 2, a. s.), a median 
organ grooved along its dorsal surface. In no Homopteron, in 
either the young or adult, are the cerci present so far as we have 
observed.* Whether an anal style is present in Psocide 
where cerci are absent we are unable to say. 


If we dissect an immature imago from the nymphal skin 
just before it moults we find that the apices of the adult, g1, g2 
and g3 rest within the nymphal gl, g2 and g3 so there can be 
no question as to their homology. 


Walkerf in his admirable study of the ovipositor of 
Orthoptera, has shown good reasons for considering g3 as the 
coxites of the ninth sternite. In the nymphal stages of some 
Orthoptera g3 carry the styles which are lost before the adult 
stage is reached. In many Odonata these styles are retained 
in the adult. In the Cercopide there is evidence to indicate 
that gl are the coxites of the eighth sternite but none to indicate 
that g3 are the coxites of the ninth. If they be, then the area 
between them and the tenth sternite is not the ninth sternite. 
This leaves g2 as the only true gonapophyses and their origin 
is open to speculation. 


’ 


If we consider the genital organs as representing the ‘“‘legs’ 
of the eighth and ninth segments, then gl would represent 


*Huxley, in The Anatomy of Invertebrated Animals, p. 364, fig. 104, figures 
an Aphis in which cerci are present. Whether this is supposed to be drawn from 
an actual specimen or is only a composite figure, we are unable to state. 


tWalker, 1919, Ann. Ent. Soc. Am. XIII, p. 267-316. 


204 Annals Entomological Society of America  [Vol. XV, 


the coxites* of the eighth sternite, g2 the endopodites and g3 
the coxites of the ninth sternite. The style of the abdominal 
sternites cannot represent the “‘legs’’ (endopodites) but the 
exopodites, unless we consider that the styles on the thoracic 
coxe are not their homologies. In Machilis heteropus Silv. the 
‘‘ovipositor’’ consists of two pair of appendages, one of which 
represents the endopodite of the ninth sternite and the other 
the endopodite of the eighth. A careful comparison of the 
male and female genitalia in a representative series of species 
of Machilis and allied genera would be of great morphological 
value. 


CERCOPID MALE. - 


In the male nymph of Philaenus leucophthalmus (Linn) the 
gonapophyses arise in exactly the same place as in the female. 
In the earliest instar of the nymph g2 is a small, single median 
process, in the following instar it is bilobed at the apex (Figs. 
5 and 6). In the last instar the genital processes are smaller 
than in the female and gl are not in such close connection 
with the eighth sternite. A comparison of Figures 1 and 7 
indicates the differences between the sexes. 


In the adult male the segment behind the eighth forms a 
ring-like pygofer with the ventral margin produced into a 
pair of narrow, flat processes (gp) with a longitudinal line of 
weakness along the middle of the ventral surface (Figs. 8 and 9, 
gl or gp). The-tenth and eleventh segment form the anal 
segment, the posterior margin of the former being produced into 
two large, thick spines curved downward (Fig. 8) and the 
anterior margin into two small curved processes (Fig. 8). 
From the middle cf the area between the anal segment and 
the gp of the pygofer arises three processes, a median penis 
or aedeagus (Fig. 8, p) and a pair of genital styles (Fig. 8, gs). 
The latter project well into the pygofer as apodemes (Fig. 8, gss) 
for the attachment of muscles. 


If we dissect out an immature imago from the nymphal skin 
shortly before the final moult we find that the apices of gp le 


*Walker considers gl and g2 to be similar organs of the eighth and ninth 
segments. This would make them both endopodites. Certain of the evidence 
appear to favor his v ew and we are quite prepared to accept it, but we have used 
the term coxites as their development in the Homoptera appear to indicate that 
they are those organs, rather than the endopodites. 


1922] Kershaw and Muir: Genitalia of Homoptera 205 


within gl, the apex of p within g2 and the apices of gs within g3, 
but the last is obscure and the more difficult to trace. This 
shows their true homologies and also shows the homologies of 
the male and female, which can be represented as follows: 


Nymph Adult of Adult @ 
Anterior gonapophyses gl Genital plates Outer {Processes of 
Median gonapophyses g2 Aedeagus Inner Ovipositor 
Posterior gonapophyses 23 Genital styles Ovipositor Sheaths 


In many species of Cercopide gl in the adult male are joined 
together into a single plate. 


COMPOSITION OF THE ADEAGUS. 


The edeagus is a complex structure and the homologies of 
its parts not clear. In the adult Philaenus leucophthalmus 
(Linn) there is a large, chitinous bulb (Fig. 8, pa) which may 
represent the periandrium, and a straight penis (Fig. 8, p). 
On the ventral aspect of the apex of the penis is the orifice or 
gonopore (Fig. 8, gpr). It is possible that during copulation 
the ejaculatory sac may be protruded or evaginated and the 
gonopore or functional orifice be situated upon it. Figure 8 
shows this sac slightly protruded. At the apex of the penis 
there are two large, curved hooks, the penis hooks (Fig. 8, ph), 
and below them four smaller processes in a circle. In the later 
nymphal stages the area around the base of g2 is invaginated, 
carrying with it both g2 and the bases of g3, (Fig. 10). The 
penis hooks (ph) of the adult lie within the bifurcations of g2, 
(Fig. 11). The bulb or periandrium (pa) evidently arises 
from the body wall, round the base of g2. The fact that g2 
first arises as a single lobe and the bifurcation arises later 
may indicate that it is only the penis hooks that are homologous 
to the paired processes of the female and the rest of the edeagus 
(the penis and bulb) are formed by outgrowths of the body wall. 


206 Annals Entomological Society of America  [Vol. XV, 


Membracide 


One of the authors* has published notes on the development 
of the genitalia of a membracid (Tricentus). In all its main 
features it is similar to the Cercopide. 


Cicadellide. 


Observations on Eurymela and Deltocephalus mollipes also 
show the same development as in the Cercopide. 


Cicadide 


No remarks are needed on the female genitalia, as they 
are the same as in Cercopide. 

In the male Cicadide we have a very distinct type of geni- 
talia. Although we have not followed the details of develop- 
ment so thoroughly as in Cercopide, yet enough is known to 
clearly indicate the line of development and the homologies. 


In forms such as Pompomia maculaticollis the seventh 
sternite is large and produced considerably posteriorly where 
it is shghtly emarginate in middle or broadly and slightly 
bilobed. Whether this extension represents a development 
of the seventh coxites we cannot say. The eighth sternite 
forms a large plate which almost conceals the pygofer from 
below. Posteriorly it narrows to a blunt point at apex, which 
has a cleft in middle, thus making it bilobed. This represents 
the eighth sternite and coxites and the eighth spiracles are 
situated near its basal angles. The pygofer is large, its medio- 
ventral surface membranous. From the lateral margins arise 
a pair of non-articulated processes which represent the much 
reduced g3. From the middle of the opening of the pygofer 
arises the aedeagus, which in most Cicadide is long, thin and 
tubular, but in some complex and trilobed. The anal segment 
is similar in composition to that of the Cercopide; in some 
species 1t is complex. 

If our interpretation of the large plate below, or anterior 
to, the pygofer, be correct, then it will represent a more 
generalized type than the Cercopide so far as this structure is 
concerned; but the reduced and non-articulate genital style is a 
specialization. The plate in question represents the hypandrium. 


*Kershaw, 1913, Ann. Soc. en Belgique, 57 (191-201). 


1922] Kershaw and Muir: Genitalia of Homoptera 207 


The Cicadide differ from all other Cicadoidea and Ful- 
goroidea in that the coxites of the eighth sternites, or gl, are not 
incorporated into the pygofer, whereas in all the other families 
they are. 


Fulgoroidea. 


In the Fulgoroidea we have a third type, which is a 
development of the Cercopid type. There is a complete pygofer 
often forming a more or less complete chitinous ring, one pair 
of articulate genital styles and an edeagus, which is often 
very complex. The genus Tettigometra is an exception, for 
along with other Cicadoidean characters it has a pygofer 
similar to Cercopids, with two pairs of styles. In the genus 
Hilda gl are more completely amalgamated to the pygofer. 
On account of the availability of material Perkinsiella sacchar- 
wcida Kirk (Delphacidee) has been selected as a type, although 
its small size makes it unsuitable for observing the development. 


In the female nymph the ninth tergite forms nearly a com- 
plete circle, having a small opening on the ventral aspect 
(Figs. 12, 9), the anal segment and genital area being sunk 
into this ring. At the posterior edge of the eighth sternité, 
between the lateral margins of the ninth tergite, arises the 
gonapophyses. Only the paired gl and the single, median g2 
are visible, but upon dissecting the g3 are found beneath the 
larger anterior processes (Fig. 13); g2 is not bilobed at the apex. 
The homologies of the adult processes can be demonstrated by 
the apices of the processes of the immature imago lying within 
the nymphal processes. They are similar to those of the 
Cercopide, but much longer, and as the imago develops 
within the nymph the base of the ovipositor has to move 
forward towards the thorax, taking along with it the median 
portion of the preceding sternites. This causes the abdominal 
sternites of the adult to be V-shaped and the ovipositor to 
appear as if arising far anterior to the apex of the abdomen. 
The pygofer 1s also carried forward so that it is long and narrow. 
In many Fulgorids the ovipositor is short and projects beyond 
the end of the abdomen, or is nearly or quite abortive; in these 
cases the abdominal sternites are not V-shape. 


In the male nymph of P. saccharicida the ninth tergite is 
similar to that of the female, but the gonapophyses are much 


208 Annals Entomological Society of America |Vol. XV, 


smaller and more obscure. In the adult the pygofer forms a 
ring; from its medio-ventral edge arises two small, laterally 
flattened spines; a pair of moderately small, flattened genital 
styles arise near the ventral margin, with a more or less 
chitinous wall, the diaphragm, dividing them from the 
edeagus which is subcylindrical, flattened laterally, with the 
orifice at the apex on dorsal aspect, with two spines near the 
orifice. A chitinization of the body wall connects the base of 
the edeagus with the base of the anal segment, and there is a 
chitinous connection between the base of aedeagus and the base 
of the genital styles. 


If we dissect out the immature male from the nymphal 
skin we find that the body wall at the base of the edeagus is 
invaginated, but the genital styles are not carried with it, 
there being a fold of the body wall between them, (Fig. 19, dia). 
It is this fold which forms the diaphragm of the adult. At an 
early stage of development the edeagus is a simple tubular 
body with the opening slightly before the apex; the genital 
styles are proportionally short and flat and the two processes 
on the ventral margin of pygofer (gl) are relatively large. (Figs. 
15, 16 and 17). At the stage shown in Figure 19 they are 
more than half the length of the genital styles. 


In most of the Delphacide there is no trace of gl in the 
fully developed pygofer; in a few there is a single median 
process, but the genus Perkinsiella has a pair of processes 
which varies in shape and size in each species. The genus 
Pissonotus shows gl very well developed (Fig. 20). Among 
other fulgorids gl are often well developed (4. e., Olonia 
picea, Eurybrachide and Eurynomeus granulatis, Achilide). 


Among the thousand and more genera of the Fulgoroidea 
the differences of edeagus are very great, but they can be 
reduced to three sub-types, which we will refer to as Tettigo- 
metroid (A), Delphacoid (B) and Flatoid (C). The Tettigo- 
metroid, for other reasons besides the type of male genitalia, 
we consider as the most primitive type of fulgorid. In the genus 
Tettigometra the pygofer is of the Cercopid type. In Hilda 
breviceps gl are incorporated into the pygofer; the periandrium 
is large and bulb-like and the edeagus very short, the con- 
junctiva being distinct; the penis-styles apodemes are well 
developed. The medio-ventral margin of pygofer is produced. 


1922] Kershaw and Muir: Genitalia of Homoptera 209 


The more common form of this subtype is found among the 
Cixtidee (i. e., Oliarus), where the periandrium forms a fairly 
long tube more or less chitinous and often bearing large spines 
and other processes, the penis is often complex and produced 
into processes and more or less membranous so that the con- 
junctiva is not sharply defined; the penis apodeme passes 
through the periandrium and joins the base of the penis. The 
following families have this subtype: Tettigometride; Cixiide 
in part; Delphacide in part; Tropiduchide in part; Derbidz 
modified. 

In the Flatoid subtype the periandrium is shorter and 
wider, and generally funnel shape and the penis is invaginated 
into the periandrium and is also often funnel shape. Both the 
periandrium and the penis often form a short tube or ring 
bearing lateral processes. The complexity is very great in 
some forms (i. e., Capelopterum maculifrons, Isside). The 
Meenopline of the Cixiidee come under this type and thereby 
add one more character by which they approach the Flatide. 
The following families have this type of edeagus: Flatide, 
Acanaloniide, Ricaniide, Isside, Dictyophoride, Fulgoride, 
Achilide, Eurybrachide, Lophopide and Cixiide in part. 

The Delphacoide subtype contains Delphacide in part and 
Tropiduchide in part. In it the periandrium is greatly reduced 
or absent and the penis alone forms the aedeagus and is generally 
tubular. The periandrium generally forms a small ring at 
the base of the edeagus and is joined by a chitinous structure 
to the base of the anal segment. 


FURTHER SPECULATIONS. 


We consider that the facts briefly stated in this paper are 
sufficient to demonstrate the homology between the genitalia of 
the two sexes, and between the Fulgoroidea and the Cicadoidea. 
There is much work still to be done in all the groups, especially 
in the Fulgoroidea where the variation in detail, especially 
in the edeagus, is very great. Exactly what becomes of the 
ninth sternite has yet to be shown, also the nature of the area 
between the edeagus and the anal segment. 

Turning to other orders we find that the Lepidoptera and 
Trichoptera appear to be built upon the same morphological 
plan as the Fulgorids. There is a ring-like segment which 


210 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


appears to be the ninth, a-small anal segment, one pair of 
articulate genital styles and a median edeagus. They are so 
similar that it appears only logical to conclude that they have 
a similar origin and development. At least it urges us to 
study the pupal stage and the immature imago to see if any 
evidence of such a development can be found. The Lepidoptera 
possess no cerci in the males while the Trichoptera possess 
Ceri 

Elsewhere one of the authors has insisted that no evidence 
has been brought forward to show the homology between the 
male and female genitaha of Coleoptera, and that in many 
forms the male gonopore appears to open between the ninth 
and tenth sternites. If in the Homoptera the coxites can be 
disassociated from the eighth sternite and become amalgamated 
with the ninth tergite so as to appear as the ninth sternite, 
it is highly probable that the same has happened in Coleoptera. 
But until direct evidence is brought forward showing that 
such is the case, we must not dogmatically assert that it has. 
Wherever the hypandrium appears as the ninth sternite we 
must bear in mind the possibility of 1t being the coxites of the 
eighth sternite. 

If this homology of the sexes in Coleoptera can be dem- 
onstrated, it helps us to understand the wonderful coadaptation 
between the internal sac and the uterus, for they are then 
true homologies and the cause which modifies one can modify 
the other in the same manner. The question is worthy of 
further study. 


1922] 


Kershaw and Muir: Genitalia of Homoptera 211 


EXPLANATION OF PLATE XIII. 


Philenus leucophthalmus. 


Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 


Seo a ae 


Ventral view of VIII-X sternites of nymph, last instar. 

Lateral view of apical abdominal segments of adult. 

Anterior processes of ovipositor. 

Median and posterior processes of ovipositor. 

Gonapophyses at an early stage. 

Gonapophyses penultimate nymphal stage. 

Ventral view of VIII-X sternites of nymph, last instar. 

Lateral view of apical segments of adult. 

Ventral view of pygofer. 

Aedeagus and one genital style of immature adult. 

Median gonapophyses, last nymphal stage, showing the 
immature adult stage within it. 


Perkinsiella saccharicida. 


Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 


Fig. 


a. seg.=Anal segment. 


12. 


an= Anus. 
as=Anal style. 
bp=basal plate. 


ee re peed 


Ventral view of last abdominal segment of nymph, last instar. 

Gonapophyses of same, enlarged. 

Ventral view of last abdominal segments of nymph, last instar. 

Aedeagus of immature adult. 

Anterior gonapophyses ‘of immature adult. 

Posterior gonapophyses of immature adult. 

Full view of pygofer of immature adult. 

Lateral view of anal segment, edeagus, anterior and posterior 
gonapophyses of immature adult just before final larval 
moult. 


Pissonotus frontalis. Full view of &@ pygofer. 


LETTERING OF FIGURES. 


g3=posterior gonapophyses=gs or 
genital styles. 

nc=new cuticle. 

oc=old cuticle. 


dia= diaphragm. p=penis. 
ejd=ejaculatory duct. pa—periandrium. 
gpr=gonopore. pg=pygofer. 
gss=apodeme'of genital style. ph=penis hooks. 
gi=anterior gonapophyses=gp or 8 stg=8th stigma. 
genital plates. 8, 9, 10, 11=tergites. 


g2=median gonapophyses. 


VIIL, EX, X=sternites. 


Vou. XV, Prats XIII. 


Annats E. S. A. 


Kershaw and Muir. 


THE PHYLOGENY OF THE GALL MITES AND A NEW 
CLASSIFICATION OF THE SUBORDER PROSTIGMATA 
OF THE ORDER ACARINA. 


By H. E. EwIna, 
Bureau of Entomology, U. S. Department of Agriculture. 


Of all the major groups of the Acarnia it is doubtful if any 
are more aberrant than the gall mites, and but few show such 
unity of organization or sameness of habits. Because of this 
there has been in the past but little evidence upon which to 
establish any natural affinities between them and any of the 
other groups, while suggestions as to their origin have been 
but little more than conjectures. 


RECENT VIEWS IN REGARD TO THE AFFINITIES OF THE 
GALL MITES. 


By way of both introduction and review, here are given 
some of the more recent views in regard to the relationships 
of the gall mites. 

In 1910 Dahl commited himself to the belief that the gall 
mites were related to the other Acarina through the Tar- 
sonemide. He regarded the genus Tarsonemus as representing 
a transitional stage between the Eriophyide and the Acarina 
proper. This belief was held largely because of the nature of 
the last pair of legs. These legs, normally developed in the 
free-living Tarsonemide, are shortened and almost rudi- 
mentary in some of the parasitic species. He found in this 
group the tendency toward leg reduction which has been so 
completely effected in the Eriophyide. 

Banks (1915) champions the Tarsonemid theory. In his 
well known treatise on the mites he states: ‘‘The Eriophyide 
are, perhaps, more closely related to the Tarsonemide than to 
any other group. Many of the Tarsonemide feed exposed on 
the leaves or stems of a plant; some of them cause swellings 
or deformities of the plant, and some have the body more or less 
distinctly segmented. Moreover, in several genera of the 
Tarsonemide there is a tendency toward reduction in the 
number of legs, and in other genera the hind legs are very 


213 


214 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


slender and of little use in walking.’’ Banks’ basis for a belief 
in Tarsonemid relationship is the existence of similar feeding 
habits of the two groups and the fact that in the Tarsonemidz 
there is ‘‘a tendency to the reduction in number of the legs.” 


Oudemans (1910) states in his review of the families of the 
Acarina* that the Eriophyide are probably most nearly related 
to the spinning mites or ‘“‘perhaps even an earlier stage of the 
Tetranychide.’’ This suggestion that the gall mites are an 
earlier stage of the Tetranychide requires some evidence for 
its support and an elaboration of explanations based on such 
evidences. Until such are brought forward the suggestion 
falls far short of a theory which can be used constructively in 
the advancement of our knowledge of natural relationships. 


A THEORY AS TO THE PHYLOGENY OF THE ERIOPHYID. 


It is my purpose here to state and then substantiate a 
definite theory as to the origin of the gall mites. The theory 
is this: The gall mites, a highly aberrant and degeneratively 
specialized group of phytophagous parasites, have arisen 
through the process of profound morphological change and 
adjustment, from a recently discovered group of gall-making 
spider mites. This group the writer has recognized as a 
family, the Phytoptipalpide, and it is to be regarded as a 
transitional group between the Eriophyide and the Tetrany- 
chide. I would not derive the gall mites from any living 
species of the family Phytoptipalpidz or even from the genus 
Phytoptipalpus; yet it appears from the evidence at hand 
that the two or more living species of Phytoptipalpus are 
barely out of a line of direct descent between the spider mites 
and the gall mites. 


THE GENUS PHYTOPTIPALPUS—ITS DISCOVERY AND THE 
INTERPRETATION OF ITS RELATIONSHIPS. 


The genus Phytoptipalpus was established in 1905 by 
Tragardh for a very peculiar mite species named by him 
paradoxus, which was found in galls of an African species 
of Acacia. The species was very peculiar in several respects. 
It evidently was a true gall making species, yet did not belong 
to the group known as the gall mites. The mites were red, 


*Oudemans, A. C. A Short Survey of the More Important Families of Acari. 
Bul. Ent. Research, Vol. J, pp. 105-119, figs. 1-22. 


1922] Ewing: Phylogeny of Gall Mites Se 2565 


with a somewhat elongate body, and had even in the adult 
stage only six legs. The mouth-parts were all but identical 
with those of the Eriophyide, while the tarsal armature was 
quite similar in some respects to that of certain genera of the 
Tetranychide. The species was oviparous and differed very 
markedly in its development from that of the spider mites. 

Recently the present writer has described* another species 
of Phytoptipalpus taken from the jujube tree (Zizyphus jujuba) 
in India. This species is quite similar to the one described by 
Tragardh. It makes galls on the bark of the jujube and lives 
inside of these galls. So similar is this species to Tragardh’s 
paradoxus that any phylogenetic significance that attaches 
to the one should usually apply to the other. The two species 
are not only congeners, but are very closely related. 

The interpretation which the present writer places on the 
meaning of the peculiar structure of Phytoptipalpus is exactly 
the reverse of that given by Tragardh. Tragardh held that 
the similarity between the mouth-parts of Phytoptipalpus and 
the Eriophyide was due to convergence, hence attached no 
phylogenetic significance to them and was content to place his 
new genus in the subfamily Tetranychine next to the genus 
Tenuipalpus. He states: ‘‘Die so geartete umbildung der 
Mundteile von Phytoptipalpus, welche bei der Gattung Tenwi- 
palpus gewissermassen vorbereitet ist, ist ein sehr schones 
Beisipel von -Konvergenz unter dem Einfluss von gleichen 
ausseren Lebensbedingungen. Die Gattung Phytoptipalpus 
lebt namlich wie die Phytoptiden in Pflanzengallen und ernahrt 
sich von den Pflanzensaften.”’ 

This resemblance which Tragardh explains as being due to 
convergence, the present writer would ascribe as due chiefly 
to inheritance. In other words, the Eriophyid type of mouth- 
parts is similar to the Phytoptipalpus type, not because both 
Eriophyids and the Phytoptipalpi inhabit galls, but chiefly 
because they have the same ancestry. This thesis I now will 
attempt to both explain and establish. It involves a considera- 
tion of other characters than the mouth-parts and other mites 
than the two groups mentioned. We will start, however, 
with the mouth-parts. I will compare first the mouth-parts 
of the Eriophyide with the species of Phytoptipalpus with which 
I have worked. The name of this species is Phytoptipalpus 
transitans. 


*Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash., Vol. XXIV, p. 108. 


216 Annals Entomological Society of America  [Vol. XV, 


THE MOUTH-PARTS OF THE ERIOPHYIDA AND THOSE OF 
PHYTOPTIPALPUS TRANSITANS EWING. 


The close resemblance between the mouth-parts of Phy- 
toptipalpus and those of gall mites were clearly recognized when 
Tragardh established the genus for his species, paradoxus. 
This resemblance was emphasized by giving the genus its name, 
Phytoptipalpus. 

In the Eriophyide the mouth-parts have been reduced and 
consolidated. The palpi are no longer free, but have become 
shortened and fused with their bases to become a trough 
(Fig. 1) in which lie the needle-like chelicere. Evidences of 
segmentation is retained by the palpi, and three indistinct 
segments are usually recognized. The chelicere (Fig. 1, c) 
are minute, very slender and needle-like. Those of Eriophyes 
pyri I have detached from the body and find that they arise 


) 
I ay 


Fig. 1. Mouth-parts of Eriophyes pyri; all drawings greatly and equally enlarged. 
A, dorsal view of capitulum; 0, side view, showing the palpus, the 
extended chelicere and the ventral mouth-opening; c, dorsal view of 
chelicere. 


from a common base (Fig. 1, c). The oral opening is con- 
spicuous and is situated on the ventral floor of the fused mouth- 
parts. This position is typical for other Acarina. 

In Phytoptipalpus the palpi are reduced and fused so as to 
form a trough for the chelicere. This fusion has been even 
more complete than 1n the Eriophyide, as only a single segment 
remains discernible. The chelicere are small, very slender 
and needle-like. They are elbowed near their bases, and the 
latter are lodged in a well defined mandibular plate. On 
the ventral side of the fused maxilla is a conspicuous opening. 
According to Tragardh it is through this opening in paradoxus 
that the chelicere are thrust. In transitans the chelicere lie 
in an almost capillary gutter and are thrust from the tip of the 
capitulum and not at all through this opening. According 


1922] Ewing: Phylogeny of Gall Mites 217 


to the view of the present writer this opening is no other than 
the mouth-opening which leads to the pharynx. 

So nearly alike are the mouth-parts of Phytoptipalpus 
and those of the Eriophyide, that to explain their complete 
homology it is only necessary to point out their few differences. 
The maxillez and the maxillary palpi are practically the same 
in both cases except in Phytoptipalpus only a single fused 
palpal segment is distinguishable, while in the Eriophyide 
three are usually recognizable. The stylets of the chelicerz 
of the two groups are the same, except that in Phytoptipalpus 
they are elbowed near the base. In Phytoptipalpus and all 
of the spider mites the bases of the chelicere are lodged in a 
flat chitinous structure which may be in certain species 


Fig. 2. Ventral view of anterior part of body of Eriophyes pyri; 
greatly enlarged. 


protrusible. This structure has long been known as the 
mandibular plate. In working on the homologies of the 
mouth-parts of the Eriophyide the writer has found that in 
E. pyri that the cheliceree both arise from a common base, 
and that this base could logically be regarded as the same 
structure which in the Tetranychide and in Phytoptipalpus 
is called the mandibular plate. It is a greatly reduced structure 
in the Eriophyide and in fact is vestigial. 

The pharynx and oral opening in the two groups of mites 
are, as I have found, identical, although Tragardh regarded 
the ventral opening in paradoxus as being a provision for the 
thrusting out of the chelicere. 


218 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


THE TARSAL ARMATURE IN THE ERIOPHYID AND IN 
PHY TOPTIPALPUS. 


The Tarsonemid theory of the origin of the Eriophyide 
fails utterly to explain the presence of the peculiar tarsal 
armature of the gall mites.. In the Eriophyidez each tarsus 
is armed at its tip with a simple claw and below it with the 
pectinate structure known as the “feather hair’’ (Fig. 3, c). 
The so-called “feather hair’’ is composed of an almost straight 
central part from which branch off below four or five pairs of 
barbs. 

Of all the groups of the Acarina no other group gives as 
close an approximation to the Eriophyid type of tarsal armature 
as the red spiders, or spider mites. Of the various genera of 


Wm 


Fig. 3. Tarsal armatures of Syncaligus, a; of Phytoptipalpus, b; 
and of Eriophyes, c. 


the spider mites the genus Syncaligus, a genus showing many 
relationships with Phytoptipalpus, has a tarsal armature most 
nearly like that of the Eriophyide. In this genus there is 
a ventral structure, the empodium (Fig. 3, a), which differs 
from the “‘feather hair’’ of the Eriophyide only in being stouter 
and having one or two less barbs, or branches. In addition to 
the empodium in Syncaligus, two tarsal claws are present. 
It is from the Syncaligus type of tarsus that the tarsal armature 
of both Phytoptipalpus and the Eriophyide have probably 
been developed; in Phytoptipalpus by the splitting of the 
empodium into two and an increasing of the number of its 
branches, and in the Eriophyide by the atrophy of one of the 
tarsal claws. That one of the tarsal claws is easily lost is shown 
repeatedly in the Acarina. Even in the Tetranychide it is now 


1922] Ewing: Phylogeny of Gall Mites . 219 


taking place in the genus Paratetranychus, has taken place 
in genera Tetranychus and Oligonychus; while in another genus 
in the same family, the genus Anychus, both claws are gone. 

Thus it is seen that not only is the Eriophyid tarsus struc- 
turally more nearly related to a type found in the Tetranychide, 
but it can be homologized with the latter type, and the evolu- 
tionary changes necessary to give the exact Eriophyid tarsus 
are actually observed now in progress in the group from which 
we would derive the Eriophyids. 


THE FORM OF THE BODY IN THE ERIOPHYIDA AND 
THE TETRANYCHIDA. 


Next in morphological importance to the structure of the 
mouth-parts and of the tarsal armature and number of legs 
in the Eriophyide, is probably the form of the body. It is in 
nearly all species vermiform, in fact one of the common names 
of the suborder of gall mites is Vermiformia. In addition, 
the long-drawn-out body is ringed with many circular folds 
of the integument. 

This ringed, vermiform condition is only matched in the 
hair follicle mites of all the other major mite groups, and the 
hair follicle mites are so different from the gall mites in 
practically all other respects that a suggestion of their affinity 
with the Eriophyide has never even been made. 

Undoubtedly the vermiform body of a hair follicle mite is 
an adaptation—an absolutely necessary adaptation—to its 
life in the hair follicles, and with almost complete assurance 
we can accept it that their origin and descent is from some 
ectoparasitic zoophagous group, probably from the parasitic 
Cheyletide as held by Hirst. 

Searching elsewhere in the different groups of the Acarina, 
instances of a vermiform tendency are found in several of them 
and as has been noted, exists in the Tarsonemida, more par- 
ticularly, however, in the female, for the males of the Tarsone- 
mids are as.a rule short-bodied. In the Tetranychide we find 
not only examples of this tendency to develop the vermiform 
type of body, but it is correlated with the development of 
the gall-producing habit. 

In such free-living and active genera as Tetranychus and 
Paratetranychus the body is stout, but in other. genera’ where 
the attacks of the mites are so restricted that they live almost 


220 Annals Entomological Society of America  [Vol. XV, 


as fixed parasites, the body becomes more flattened and usually 
elongate. Then in such species as Strgmaeus floridanus Banks, 
which lives in colonies at the bases of imbricated leaves of the 
pineapple, the body becomes markedly lengthened. Finally, 
in the genus Phytoptipalpus we find not only a lengthened body, 
but in the male particularly the body ringed in almost the same 
way asin the Eriophyide. (Fig. 4). 


4 
fa (0 
' 


Fig. 4. Phytoptipalpus transitans Ewing. Ventral views of male (smaller 
individual) and female (larger individual) equally enlarged. 


SUMMARY OF RELATIONSHIPS. 


Thus it is found that in what probably constitutes the three 
most important groups of morphological structures in the gall 
mites, that these structures can be homologized with those of 
the same groups in the Phytoptipalpide. Further, it is observed 
that all modifications necessary to give the types of these three 
important group of characters in the Eriophyide can be 
explained, and what is more important, the processes of change 


1922] Ewing: Phylogeny of Gall Mites 221 


can actually be traced out not only in other groups of mites, 
but in the Tetranychide and the Phytoptipalpide the two 
families held to be the most nearly related to the Eriophyide. 
Lastly the morphological changes thus traced out are correlated 
with changes in habits which give finally a high degree of 
approximation between the hypothetical ancestral group and 
the group whose origin is to be explained. 


Bdellidae Eupodidae Caeculidae Trom bidiidae 


Hydracarina 
Eryth raeidaée 
An ystida e 


Tetranychidae 


Free Living 
Cheyletidae 


roslugma a 


Parasitic Cheyletidae 
Ph ytopti palpidae 


Acarina Trunk 


Eriophyidae 


Demodecidae 


Fig. 5. A “‘tree’’ diagram illustrating the origin and relationships of the families 
of Prostigmata. 


The relationship and origin of the Eriophyide is indicated in 
the following diagram (Fig. 5). For sake of completeness the 
relationships of other families of the order Prostigmata are also 
shown according to the writer’s interpretation. 

The same relationships can be shown in the form of a key 
to the families of Prostigmata; not so clearly, yet some practical 
advantage may be obtained in the key by enabling one to place 
properly a given species to family. A key to the families of the 
suborder Prostigmata is here given in the form of a new classifi- 
cation. In this classification the mouth-parts are made, to 
a large extent, the basis for family differentiation. 


222 Annals .Entomological Society of America  [Vol. XV, 


A NEw CLASSIFICATION OF THE SUBORDER PROSTIGMATA. 


A. Chelicere chelate; adapted for biting; palpi without thumb, 
Section ADACTYLOGNATHA 
B. Mouth-parts not formed into a beak; palpi neither geniculate or 


TAP tCOLials sie nec eee ee ee Ie Eupodide 
BB. Mouth-parts formed into a conspicuous beak; palpi either geniculate or 
FApPtoOrial scsi ch Po ea eat ORO ae ee oO EE ee Bdellide 


AA.Chelicere either faleate or needle-pointed, adapted for piercing. 
B. Legs usually adapted for swimming. Aquatic mites, 
Section HYDRACARINA 
C. Mouth-parts not situated on a beak. Fresh water mites, 


Hydrachnide 
CC. Mouth-parts situated on a more or less distinct beak. Marine 
OCHS Nee ee EEN ASN, Site Ge mead cA eA old a Sige R oe & Halacaride 


BB. Legs not adapted for swimming. Mites not aquatic. 

C. Legs composed of more than three segments; palpi provided with a 
thumb, except in degenerate forms, in which case they are fused 
Wel Wado MMP ANIED, occu cacoobehsougv0 se Section DACTYLOGNATHA 

D. Chelicere falcate; palpi free, five-segmented and with the last 
segment always formed into a thumb. 

E. First and second legs provided with processes bearing 
large spines; integument with large chitinous shields, 

Caeculide 

EE. First and second legs without processes bearing spines; 
integument without any large chitinous shield. 

F. Cephalothorax with a rod-like structure at the bottom’ 

of a median dorsal groove; legs stouter and usually 

Well Guys WewAS a onaneoochooonosdo4- Trombidude 

FF. Cephalothorax without rod-like structure and median 
dorsal groove; legs more slender and tarsi never 
Swollens Me ays Sane oe ee ee ae Anystide 

DD. Chelicere not falcate but either styletiform or needle-like; palpi 

frequently reduced in size and number of segments, and 

variously modified. 

E. Cephalothorax with a rod-like structure at the bottom of a 
median dorsal groove; tarsi not attenuated, but on the 
contrary frequently swollen; body well clothed with 
SHORE ASCLESSA Since thor seceie Mae ee Erythraeide 

EE. Cephalothorax without rod-like structure and median dorsal 
groove; tarsi tapering from base to apex; body sparesly 
clothed with sete of varying lengths. 

F. Each tarsus provided with either a pectinate distal 
appendage or tenent hairs, or both of these; palpi 
moderate or small; phytophagous in habits. 

G. Adults with four pairs of legs; palpi free; never 
DEOC Cit Sarca)l! See ene eee Tetranychide 
GG. Adults with less than four pair of legs; palpi greatly 
reduced and united ventrally to form a trough 
for the needle-like chelicerz; usually producing 
and inhabiting galls. 

H. Body not vermiform; adults with six legs; each 
tarsus provided with two claws and two 

“feather hairs;’’ gall makers. 
Phytoptipalpide 
HH. Body vermiform; adults with only four legs; 
each tarsus provided distally only with a 
single claw and ‘‘feather hair’’.. Eriophyide 
FF. Tarsus usually without pectinate appendages and always 
without tenent hairs; palpi usually large; predaceous 


Om [ORMASMING sim IMAVONES, oo s0aaccanscnouans Cheyletide 
CC. Legs stumpy and composed of only three segments; body vermiform. 
Parasitic / Mites: Aub. tat eee eee ee Section BRACHYPODA 


Ones familys io. o2s wes ace Sete ee ee ome ae Demodec’de 


UNDESCRIBED SPECIES OF CRANE-FLIES FROM 
NEW ZEALAND. 


(Tipulidz, Diptera). 
By CHARLES P. ALEXANDER. 


The new species of New Zealand Tipulide described in this 
paper were included in extensive collections sent to the writer 
by Dr. Campbell, collected by Messrs. Gourlay, Harris, Howes and 
himself; collections from Dr. Tillyard and Mr. Philpott in the 
Cawthron Institute; and a small but interesting lot from the 
alpine zone of Mt. Ruapehu, sent by Mr. Watt. The writer is 
very greatly indebted to all the above mentioned gentlemen for 
this material. The holotypes are preserved in the writer’s 
collection except where stated to the contrary. 

Mr. F. W. Edwards, of the British Museum of Natural 
History, has recently completed a monographic review of the 
New Zealand Tipuloidea. The writer would express his most 
sincere gratitude to Mr. Edwards for the privilege of studying 
this manuscript in advance of publication. The appearance in 
press of this great work will do much to stimulate the study of 
the very interesting crane-fly fauna of New Zealand. In addi- 
tion, the writer has availed himself of the opportunity to sub- 
mit certain doubtful species of the very large genus Gynoplistia 
to Mr. Edwards for his expert opinion and comparison with the 
unrivalled series of types of New Zealand Tipuloidea in the 
collection of the British Museum. 


Dicranomyia subviridis, sp. n. 


General coloration light yellow; antenne dark brown: 
wings nearly hyaline, the costa tinged with green; Sc ending 
far before the origin of Rs; Rs short, about equal to the deflec- 
tion of Rays. 

Male.—Length about 5.5 mm.; wing 6.5 mm. Female.— 
Length 6.2 mm.; wing 7.2 mm. 

Rostrum pale obscure yellow; palpi light brown. Antenne dark 
brown, the scapal segments very little paler; flagellar segments sub- 


moniliform in the female, slightly more elongate in the male. Head 
yellow, paler posteriorly, passing into gray on the gene. 


223 


224 Annals Entomological Society of America  |Vol. XV, 


Mesonotum clear yellow, unmarked, scutellum and median area of 
scutum almost white. Pleura concolorous. Halteres pale, the knobs a 
little darker. Legs with the coxe and trochanters pale, tinged with 
green; remainder of legs pale, the terminal tarsal segments dark 
brown. Wings nearly hyaline, iridescent, the veins strongly tinged 
with green, especially the outer end of costa. Venation: Sc short, Sc 
ending far before the origin of Rs, the distance being nearly, if not 
quite, twice Rs; Sco apparently lacking; Rs short, subobsolete, entirely 
without macrotrichie, subequal to, or shorter than, the deflection of 
Riss; cell 1st Mz closed; basal deflection of Cu, before the fork of M. 

Abdomen pale brownish yellow, unmarked; in the female, the 
basal segments are infuscated but this is apparently due to dried egg- 
masses within the body; ovipositor reddish, the bases of the valves 
tinged with green. 


Hab. New Zealand (South Island). Holotype, #, Nelson, 
November 8, 1920 (A. Philpott). Allotopotype, 2, October 23, 
1920. Paratopotype, 9, October 23, 1920. 

Type in the collection of the Cawthron Institute. 


In its general appearance, D. subviridis is strikingly like 
D. conveniens (Walker), a very different fly. It belongs to the 
montilicornis group, distinguished by the short subcosta, very 
short sector and closed cell 1st Mo. 


Dicranomyia sperata, sp. n. 

General coloration obscure brownish yellow; head dark 
brownish black; wings whitish subhyaline with conspicuous 
pale brown washes, the most conspicuous at the wing-tip; 
Sc long; r long and strongly arcuated; cell /st M, long and 
narrow, the basal deflection of Cu, at the middle of its length. 

Female.—Length 9 mm.; wing 10.5 mm. Described from an 
alcoholic specimen. 


Rostrum and palpi dark brown. Antenne dark brown, the second 
scapal segment a little paler. Head dark brownish black. 

Mesonotum light brownish yellow, the prescutum with three 
slightly darker brown stripes; scutal lobes also darker brown; scu- 
tellum more yellowish. Pleura obscure yellow, the mesosternum faintly 
darkened. Halteres obscure yellow, the knobs dark brown. Legs light 
brown, the femoral bases a little lighter, the terminal tarsal segments 
dark brown. Wings whitish subhyaline with conspicuous pale brown 
washes; cells C and Sc light brown; a brown wash along vein Cu and 
another near midlength of /st 4; anal angle of wing faintly darkened; 
cord and outer end of cell 1st Mz narrowly seamed with brown; stigma 
elongate, brown; the most conspicuous brown wash occupies the wing- 
tip beyond cell 1st M: including about the outer half of cells 2nd R, and 
R3; all except the base of R;; all of 2nd M,; the cephalic half of M3; 


1922] Alexander: Crane-Flies from New Zealand 225 


veins dark brown. Venation: Sc long, Sc; ending just beyond mid- 
length of Rs, Sco near mid-distance between the origin of Rs and the 
tip of Sc;; Rs long, provided with seven macrotrichiz; r very long and 
strongly arcuated, longer than the basal deflection of Cm, located at 
the tip of Ri; deflection of R;,; angulated and spurred; cell /s¢ M» long 
and narrow; basal deflection of Cu; at midlength of cell /st Mo. 

Abdominal tergites yellowish brown, the sternites a little darker 
with the incisures narrowly and indistinctly pale. Ovipositor with 
elongate valves. 


Hab. New Zealand (South Island). Holotype, 9 Mt. Grey, 
Canterbury, November, 1916 (J. W. Campbell). Paratypes 
2? 2, Ben Lomond Otago, December 30, 1921, January 2, 1922, 
(Geo. Howes). 


Amphineurus senex, sp. n. 


General coloration brown; wings and legs unvariegated; 
Rs square at origin; Ks,; short but evident; cell lst M, closed. 
Male.—Length 4.8 mm.; wing 5.5 mm. 


Rostrum and palpi dark brown. Antennz with the scapal segments 
dark brown; flagellar segments obscure yellow, with conspicuous erect, 
black verticils. Head greyish ochraceous, the vertex with very con- 
spicuous, light yellow, scale-like hairs. 


Mesonotal praescutum greyish ochraceous with two narrow dark 
brown intermediate stripes, very narrowly and indistinctly separated 
by a capillary pale line; lateral stripes not indicated; pseudo-sutural 
foveze very conspicuous, elongate, lying transversely, dark brown; 
tuberculate pits lying a little cephalad of the level of the fovezx, pale, 
one on either side of the capillary pale line; remainder of mesonotum 
light brown. Pleura light brownish grey variegated with darker brown; 
a group of conspicuous yellow hairs beneath the wing-root. Halteres 
yellow, the stem, except the base, densely clothed with appressed, 
dusky scale-like hairs; apex of knobs yellowish. Legs with the coxe 
and trochanters obscure yellow, the former clothed with yellow scale- 
like hairs; remainder of the legs dark brown. Wings greyish subhy- 
aline, the veins and membrane densely clothed with brown macrotrichize 
to almost completely conceal the coloration; veins pale brown. Vena- 
tion: Rs almost square at origin, feebly spurred; Rs,3 short, about 
equal to the deflection of Rij5; r on Ry about twice its length beyond 
the fork; cell 1st Mz closed, long and narrow, gradually widened dis- 
tally; m nearly three times as long as the outer deflection of M3; basal 
deflection of Cm just before the fork of M. 


Abdomen dark brown, clothed with yellow hairs.. Male hypopygium 
with the apices of the pleurites long-drawn-out, contiguous at their 
tips; the forceps at base of pleurites slender, acicular, curved, clothed 
on the inner face with pale erect hairs; second pair of forceps larger, 
black, compressed, the tips slender, curved and directed laterad. 


226 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


Hab. New Zealand (South Island). Holotype, #, Old Man 
Range, Otago, January, 1920 (Geo. Howes). Amphineurus 
senex 1s allied to A. perdecorus Edwards. 


Gynoplistia lyrifera, sp. n. 


Head grey; mesonotal praescutum and scutum shiny 
brownish black, the lateral margins of the prescutum and the 
postnotum with a microscopic grey pubescence; scutellum 
obscure yellow; wings subhyaline with a heavy brown pattern; 
abdominal tergites bicolorous; gonapophyses of male hypo- 
pygium lyriform. Male——Length 11 mm.; wing 10.6 mm. 


Rostrum dark, dusted with gray; palpi dark brown. Antenne with 
the first scapal segment dark brown; remainder of antenne broken. 
Head light gray. 

Pronotum light grey. Mesonotal preescutum shiny brownish black, 
more reddish near the suture, the humeral region and lateral margins 
conspicuously light grey; it is possible but scarcely probable that the 
specimen may be rubbed and the disk of the preescutum normally dull; 
scutal lobes shiny brownish black, the caudal lateral margin yellow, the 
caudal median area gray; scutellum conspicuously obscure yellow with 
a median spot at the base, the caudal margin with conspicuous sete; 
postnotum shiny reddish brown with a sparse microscopic grey pubes- 
cence. Pleura brown with a heavy microscopic grey pubescence, the 
dorso-pleural membrane and the lateral sclerite of the postnotum 
brownish black, the latter heavily grey pubescent; mesosternum dark 
brown laterally, narrowly pale medially. Halteres with the stem obscure 
brownish yellow, the knobs broken. Legs with the coxe pale brownish 
yellow, covered with a heavy whitish microscopic pubescence; tro- 
chanters obscure yellow; remainder of the legs broken. Wings sub- 
hyaline, heavily spotted and clouded with brown; cell Sc pale brown 
on the basal half; a large subquadrate dark brown spot at origin of Rs, 
not attaining M; stigmal area large, continued caudad along the cord 
to r-m. this area including the apices of cells 7st R; and R and the bases 
of cells R3 and R;; remainder of cord and outer end of cell 1s# M» nar- 
rowly seamed with paler brown; wing-apex broadly pale brown, 
including the tip of cell Ro, a little less than the outer half of cells Rs 
and R; and all of M, except the base which is clear; a pale brown cloud 
in the end of cell Cu; an extensive pale brown cloud occupies the basal 
half of cell Cu and the outer end of cell 1st A above the end of vein 
2nd A; no darkening at base of cells R or M; veins dark brown. Vena- 
tion; Sc; ending about opposite midlength of R43; Re+3 and basal deflec- 
tion of R4y,; subequal; tip of R; and r subevanescent, without macro- 
trichiz; petiole of cell M, about two-thirds the cell; basal deflection of 
Cu, at from two-thirds to three-fourths the length of the cell. 


Abdominal tergites indistinctly bicolorous, the apical half of the 
segments shiny black, the basal half reddish brown with a sparse light 


1922} Alexander: Crane-Flies from New Zealand 2: 


Ls) 
~I 


grey microscopic pubescence; a darker subterminal ring; hypopygium 
orange-yellow. Hypopygium with the pleurites short and stout, the 
caudal-proximal angle produced into a short stout lobe that bears a 
dense tuft of short bristles; a yellowish flattened lobe at base of pleurite 
on proximal face; the two usual pleural appendages are broadly united 
basally, the outer lobe broad-based, tapering distally, the tip suddenly 
narrowed into a curved point, not blackened or provided with spines; 
inner lobe broad-based, suddenly narrowed to the slender neck, the 
head slightly enlarged but unarmed. The two gonapophyses are very 
conspicuous, taken together appearing lyriform, each about as long as 
the pleurite, gently curved outwardly, deeply bifid at tip, the arms not 
divergent, lateral arm twice as long as the straight inner arm and 
curved strongly laterad. Penis-guard broad-based, tapering suddenly 
to the apex, much shorter than the gonapophyses. 


Hab. New Zealand. Holotype, &%, exact locality unknown 
(J. W. Campbell). 


Gynoplistia trispinosa, sp. n. 


General coloration reddish brown, the mesonotal prescutum 
more blackened, especially laterally; pleura whitish, the dorso- 
pleural region narrowly blackened; femora without pale rings; 
wings subhyaline with a very restricted pattern; abdomen 
reddish brown; male hypopygium with the outer pleural 
appendage a paddle-like, blackened blade; gonapophyses on 
either side with three spines. Male—Length 14 mm.; wing 
13 mm. 


Rostrum reddish; basal segment of palpus reddish, the terminal 
segments dark brown. Antenne with the scapal segments yellow, the 
flagellum dark brown with only the base of the first segment a little 
paler; antennz 21-segmented, the formula being 2+2+14+3; longest 
flabellation about six times as long as the segment. Head black, the 
occiput more reddish; a very faint, appressed, gray pubescence. 

Pronotum brown, the scutellum shiny yellow, only slightly infus- 
cated medially. Mesonotal preescutum shiny brownish black, the 
stripes entirely confluent, the median stripe tinged with reddish; humeral 
region reddish brown; remainder of mesonotum shiny reddish brown. 
Pleura reddish brown with a heavy, microscopic, white pubescence, the 
dorso-pleura!l region narrowly blackened; mesosternum more reddish. 
Halteres brownish yellow, the knobs darker. Legs with the coxe heavily 
white pubescent as on the pleura; trochanters reddish; femora reddish 
brown, the tips slightly darker; tibiz brown, the tips narrowly darker; 
tarsi dark brown. Wings subhyaline; cell Sc and stigma brown; a 
small, circular, brown spot at origin of Rs; very narrow brown seams 
along the cord and outer end of cell 1st M2; wing-tip in cells R3, R; and 
M, very faintly clouded with brown; a faint brown seam along vein Cu 
to the wing-margin; a faint wash near midlength of vein /st A; veins 


228 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


dark brown. Venation:r at tip of Ri and at two-thirds R.; cell M, only 
a little longer than its petiole; basal deflection of Cu; at midlength of 
cell 1st Mo. 


Abdomen uniformly reddish brown; a very faint and indistinct, 
capillary, brown, median line, broadly interrupted at the posterior 
margin of the segments. Male hypopygium reddish brown; outer 
pleural appendage broad at base, the apex dilated into a dark brown 
paddle-like blade; inner pleural appendage with the apical half consid- 
erably narrower than the basal half and provided with numerous tiny 
setee. Gonapophyses complex, each side with three spines; the most 
cephalic of these is the smallest and very slender; the second spine 
is a powerful horn directed proximad, lying immediately caudad of the 
basal spine; besides these there is an elongate spine on either side of 
the penis-guard, directed caudad, gradually narrowed to the tip. 
Penis-guard very smal! and weak. 


Hab. New Zealand (South Island). Holotype, #, Otatara, 
Otago, November 25, 1906 (A. Philpott). 


Gynoplistia spinigera, sp. n. 


General coloration light gray; antenne of male 17-seg- 
mented; wings sybhyaline, the pattern almost obliterated; 
stigma distinct; abdomen light brown with a subterminal 
black ring; penis-guard with conspicuous serrations before 
the apex. Male.—Length 11 mm.; wing 10 mm. 


Rostrum light gray; palpi broken. Antennz brown, the first 
scapal segment slightly dusted with gray; basal flagellar segment paler 
on basal half; antennze 17-segmented, the formula being 2+2+9-+4, 
the longest flabellation about four times the segment; eleventh flagellar 
segment with only a tiny protuberance and may not be considered pec- 
tinate by some, in which case the formula would be 2+2+8-+5. Head 
light gray with a U-shaped mark on the vertex, the arms becoming 
evanescent behind. 


Pronotum light gray. Mesonotal prascutum gray with four rust- 
brown stripes, the intermediate pair becoming obsolete behind, being 
replaced by the ground-color; lateral stripes much broader; humeral 
region darker gray; pseudosutural foveee very large, deep reddish 
brown; scutum gray medially, the centers of the lobes darker; scu- 
tellum destroyed by pin; postnotum gray. Pleura pale reddish brown, 
dusted with gray. Halteres broken. Legs with the coxa pale reddish 
brown, dusted with gray; trochanters yellow; femora and tibie brown, 
pale ring on femora almost obliterated; tarsi dark brown. Wings sub- 
hyaline, the pattern very reduced; cells C and Sc very pale brown; 
stigma conspicuous dark brown; a small brown cloud at basal deflection 
of Ry45; very indistinct brown seams at origin of Rs; along the cord; 
a small, faint cloud at outer end of vein Cu, and another on vein 1st A 
immediately above the end of vein 2nd A; wing-tip clear; veins brown. 


1922] Alexander: Crane-Flies from New Zealand 229 


Venation: Sc, ending opposite one-fourth Ro+3, Sc, reduced to a point 
by the downward bending of Sc; Rs long, strongly arcuated at origin, 
in alignment with Re,3 which, in turn, is in alignment with R3; r near 
midlength of Ry; r-m reduced, about equal to, or shorter than, m; 
petiole of cell M, about two-thirds the cell; basal deflection of Cu, near 
midlength of the cell. 

Abdominal segments light brown, the basal tergite dusted with 
gray; a small, circular, darker brown median spot on each tergite; 
seventh segment black; hypopygium light brown. Male hypopygium 
with the ninth tergite broad at base, narrowed distally, the apex with 
a broad V-shaped notch. Pleurites comparatively slender, the apex a 
little, produced; a small, cylindrical lobe on proximal face at base; outer 
pleural appendage angularly bent just before midlength, the tip very 
obtusely rounded and here microscopically spinulose; two small spines 
immediately before the apex; inner pleural appendage smaller, the 
proximal face beyond midlength slightly notched. Gonapophyses not 
developed. Penis-guard long and straight, the apex slightly curved, 
before the tip the lateral margins of the guard with conspicuous serra- 
tions. 


Hab. New Zealand (South Island). Holotype, &, West 
Plains, Otago, November 5, 1900. (A. Philpott). 


Gynoplistia cladophora, sp. n. 


General coloration shiny black; antenna of male 16-seg- 
mented; wings with a faint yellow tinge; cell Sc dark brown, 
wing-pattern very restricted; abdomen dark reddish brown, 
shiny; gonapophyses of male hypopygium widely separated, 
each appearing as a slender curved horn that bears a small 
lateral spine near midlength. Male—Length 9 mm.; wing 
9.2 mm. 


Rostrum black, bearing a conspicuous brush of long, yellow hairs; 
mouthparts and palpi black. Antenne black, 16-segmented, the for- 
mula being 2+2+10+2; longest flabellation about seven times as 
long as the segment that bears it; pectination of twelfth segment 
shorter than the segment; terminal flagellar segment larger than the 
others. Head rather dull black. 

Pronotum with a grayish yellow pubescence medially, shiny reddish 
laterally. Mesonotal prescutum shiny reddish laterally, with a sparse 
microscopic pubescence, the entire disk occupied by three confluent 
shiny black stripes; scutal lobes likewise largely shiny black, the 
remainder brown; scutellum brown; postnotum brown basally, shiny 
black on the posterior half; lateral sclerites of postnotum reddish 
brown. Pleura dark liver-brown, sparsely pubescent, most conspicuous 
on the mesepisternum. Halteres yellow. Legs with the coxe dark 
brown; trochanters slightly paler brown; femora brown, the tips dark 
brown; tibiae and tarsi black; legs comparatively short and stout. 


230 Annals Entomological Society of America _[Vol. XV, 


Wings with a faint yellowish tinge; cells Sc, Sc; and a seam along vein 
‘Cu dark brown; stigma dark brown, continued caudad as a compar- 
atively narrow seam along the deflection of R1,;; cord, outer end of 
-cell 1st My and most of the longitudinal veins very narrowly and indis- 
tinctly seamed with pale brown; a quadrangular brown area at origin 
.of Rs, this not attaining M; wing-tip scarcely darkened; veins dark 
brown. Venation: Sc; ending just before the end of Rs, Sc, about 
twice Sc,; Rs very long, angulated and spurred at origin; Re,; short. 
_about equal to or shorter than r-m; r at about two-thirds Ry; cell Re 
very wide at outer margin; inner ends of cells Ry and 1st Mz proximad 
.of inner end of cell R;; petiole of cell M, about two-thirds the cell; 
basal deflection of Cm just before midlength of cell 1st Mo. 


Abdominal tergites shiny, dark reddish brown, the lateral margins 
more blackened. Hypopygium with the pleurites short and stout; a 
short spine on proximal margin at base; distal ends of pleurites pro- 
duced caudad into a flattened, obtuse lobe that is about one-half the 
length of the pleural appendage; outer pleural appendage stout, flat- 
tened, with a conspicuous notch before the tip; inner pleural appendage 
subequal in length but more slender, gently curved. Gonapophyses 
very complicated in structure, widely separated from one another, each 
side appearing as a long, slender, curved horn that bears a small lateral 
spine near midlength; the long, curved apex is directed laterad, thence 
proximad and caudad, almost ina circle. Penis-guard small and slender. 


Hab. New Zealand (South Island). Holotype, ¢%, Bluff, 
Otago, November 29, 1914 (A. Philpott). 


Gynoplistia spinicalcar, sp. n. 


General coloration shiny yellowish brown; head coal-black; 
tibial spurs flattened, the margins microscopically serrulate; 
wings nearly hyaline, rather heavily marked with brown; a 
brown spot at the base of cells R and M. Female.—Length 
about 12 mm.; wing 8.3 mm. 


Rostrum and palpi dark brownish black. Antennze with the scapal 
segments reddish fulvous; flagellum broken. Head shiny coal-black. 


Pronotum black dorso-medially, obscure yellowish laterally. Meso- 
notum shiny yellowish brown without well-defined markings; scutum 
shiny yellow. Pleura dark brown, the mesepisternum with an area of 
appressed, silvery-white pubescence. Halteres yellow, the knobs 
brown. Legs with the coxa and trochanters yellow; femora yellowish 
testaceous, the dilated apices conspicuously and extensively blackened; 
tibie dark brown, the tips blackened; tarsi black; hind legs missing; 
tibial spurs flattened, narrowed basally, slightly enlarged distally and 
with the margin microscopically serrulate. Wings nearly hyaline; cell 
Sc, except the outer end, dark brown; a large brown blotch at origin 
of Rs, extending from R to M; stigma dark brown, the color continued 
.caudad along the cord as a very broad seam that continues across the 


1922] Alexander: Crane-Flies from New Zealand 231 


wing, cell Cu, being dark except at the outer anterior angle; cell /st M> 
with a circular hyaline centre; wing-tip in cells Re to M; narrowly 
darkened; a conspicuous brown cloud at the end of vein 2nd A includ- 
ing the adjoining parts of cells Cu, {st A and 2nd A; a conspicuous, 
oval, brown spot at the origin of M, almost equally distributed in cells 
Rand M; veins dark brownish black. Venation: Sc at tip of Sc; and 
much exceeding it in length; Rs gently arcuated at origin; Ro43 shorter 
than r-m; R, almost perpendicular at origin; 7 near tip of R1; petiole of 
cell M, about as long as the cell; cell /s¢ M, rectangular, the basal 
deflection of Cw; just beyond one-third its length. 

Abdomen with the basal tergites greenish black; remaining tergites 
brown with blue and purple reflexions; sternites lighter brown. Ovi- 
positor reddish horn-color, the valves very long and slender. 


Hab. New Zealand (North Island). Holotype, 2, Ohakune, 
altitude 2018 feet, March 1, 1919, (T. Harris). 


The type of Gynoplistia spinicalcar was sent to Mr. Edwards 
for comparison with his numerous types of New Zealand 
Gynoplistia. He writes ‘Closely allied to G. tridactyla Edw. 
and G. speciosa Edw. but I think certainly distinct. Note the 
peculiar spurs of the middle tibia which are quite similar in 
the two species mentioned.”’ 


Gynoplistia harrisi, sp. n. 


General coloration of mesonotum shiny brownish yellow: 
pleura shiny black, including the posterior and middle cox: 
legs orange, the femora with a conspicuous, dark brown, sub- 
terminal ring; wings with a strong yellowish tinge and a heavy 
brown pattern; cell R»: sessile; abdominal tergites shiny 
obscure yellow, segments six to eight metallic purple. Female.— 
Length 8 mm.; wing 8 mm. 


Rostrum obscure yellow; palpi dark brown. Antennz with appar- 
ently only 14 segments, all flagellar segments, except the terminal four, 
pectinate; terminal flagellar segment enlarged, apparently formed by 
the fusion of two segments; scapal segments obscure chestnut-brown; 
flagellar segments one and two obscure yellow, the pectinations dark 
brown; remainder of the antenne dark brown Head obscure brownish 
yellow, somewhat darker between the eyes. 


Pronotum obscure yellow. Mesonotal preescutum shiny brownish 
yellow with an indistinct, median, brownish black line; remainder of 
mesonotum shiny brownish yellow. Pleura shiny brownish black. 
Halteres short, pale, the large knobs darker. Legs with the posterior 
and middle coxz shiny brownish black; fore coxz obscure yellow; 
trochanters yellow; femora yellow with a narrow but conspicuous, sub- 
terminal, dark brown ring; tibie obscure yellow; posterior tibiz 


252, Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


brown with the bases and tips paler; metatarsi obscure yellow, the 
terminal tarsal segments dark brown; the posterior legs are longer 
than the others, the femora somewhat swollen, the tibiz more or less 
curved and only the terminal two tarsal segments infuscated. Wings 
with a strong yellowish tinge, brightest in cells C, Sc and 2nd A; a 
conspicuous brown pattern distributed as follows: a brown area in the 
base of cell R; a large, quadrate area at origin of Rs that barely reaches 
M; the broad stigmal area extends as a solid block to cell 1s¢ M2 where 
it splits, the center of the cell being of the ground-color; wing-tip 
broadly pale brown, including the apices of cells Re, Rs, Rs, M1 and 
2nd M>2; a conspicuous brown cloud in cells Cu and /st A at the end of 
vein 2nd A; veins dark brown, more flavous in the yellow areas; micro- 
trichiz abundant in all cells beyond cord; in the radial cell they are 
practically lacking outside of the darkened areas. Venation: Sc; ending 
just before the tip of Rs, Sc, faint, at the tip of Sa; Rs long, feebly- 
angulated at origin; cell R, sessile, the petiole entirely lacking; r close 
to tip of Ri; r-m very short, the deflections of Ryi; and M,,2 being cor- 
respondingly longer; petiole of cell M, a little shorter than the cell; 
basal deflection of Cu, at midlength of cell 1st Mo. 

Abdominal tergites shiny obscure yellow; segments six to eight 
metallic purple; lateral margins of tergites narrowly blackened; ninth 
segment and ovipositor orange; basal sternites obscure yellow; sub- 
terminal segments dark. Ovipositor with the valves very long and 
slender, straight. 


Hab. New Zealand (North Island). Holotype, 9, Ohakune, 
altitude 2018 ft.; February, 1920. (1. Barris). 

Gynoplistia harrisi is a very distinct species of the genus. It 
is dedicated to the collector, Mr. Thomas R. Harris. 


Gynoplistia unimaculata, Spe ale 


Allied to G. cuprea Hutton; a conspicuous, slender tubercle 
on lateral sclerite of mesonotal postnotum; wings yellow, 
unmarked except for the dark brown stigma; abdomen with 
the basal tergite purple, segments two to six orange-yellow. 
Sex?—Wing 12 mm. Head destroyed by insect pests. 


Mesonotum shiny reddish brown. Pleura reddish brown, the 
mesepisternum and dorsal parts of the mesosternum with a golden- 
yellow pollen; ventral portions of the mesosternum with metallic pur- 
ple reflexions; lateral sclerites of postnotum immediately cephalad of 
the base of the halteres with a conspicuous, slender tubercle, directed 
laterad and slightly caudad. Halteres yellowish ochreous. Legs with 
the coxe and trochanters reddish brown; femora light orange; tibize 
dark brown, the extreme base paler; tarsi dark brown. Wings with a 
strong brownish yellow tinge, clearer yellow in the costal region and 
the cells basad of the origin of Rs; no markings on the wing except the 
conspicuous, dark brown stigma; veins dark brown, more yellowish in 


1922] Alexander: Crane-Flies from New Zealand Zao 


the flavous areas. Venation: Sc; ending beyond the fork of Rs, Sco 
longer than Sc;; Ro,3 shorter than the deflection of Ry. 5. 

Abdomen with the basal tergite brilliant, dark metallic purple; 
segments two to six conspicuous orange-yellow with very faint purplish 
tints on the sternites; no trace of the coppery tints of G. cu prea. 


Hab. New Zealand. Holotype, Sex?, exact locality unknown 
(Received from Dr. Campbell). 


Although the unique type of this species is in poor condition, 
there can be no question of its specific validity. The almost 
unicolorous yellow wings with the stigma dark brown render 
the fly a conspicuous one. 


Gynoplistia splendens, sp. n. 


General coloration shiny reddish brown; antennze 19-seg- 
mented; mesopleura with a patch of golden-yellow hairs: a 
conspicuous tubercle on mesepimeron; femora fulvous; wings 
bright yellow, marked with brown, including a broad apical 
and caudal margin. Female—Length about 19 mm.; wing 
15-541: 


Rostrum shiny yellowish brown; palpi dark brown. Antenne dark 
brown; antennze 19-segmented, the formula being 2+2+9+6; the 
twelfth flagellar segment bears a small lateral tubercle that is shorter 
than the segment but which might be considered as being a pectination, 
in which case the formula would be 2,2,10,5; longest flagellar pectina- 
tion between three and four times as long as the segment. Head shiny 
brownish red, black between the eyes. 


Pronotum dark reddish brown. Mesonotum shiny reddish brown, 
the median area of the prescutum almost black; median sclerite of 
postnotum paler laterally. Pleura dark chestnut brown with an exten- 
sive area of short, dense, appressed, golden-yellow hairs on mesepister- 
num and cephalic margin of mesepimeron; dorsal margin of mesepi- 
meron, immediately beneath the wing-root, produced laterad and 
caudad into a stout, conspicuous tubercle. Halteres dark brown, the 
knobs conspicuously orange-yellow. Legs with the coxa and _ tro- 
chanters dark chestnut-brown; femora rich fulvous, the tips narrowly 
blackened; fore tibize brown, the tips dark brown; mid-tibie reddish 
brown, near midlength passing into dark brown; posterior tibize fulvous, 
concolorous with femora, only the tips narrowly blackened; tarsi black. 
Wings bright yellow with a rather extensive brown pattern; a large 
spot at origin of Rs, barely confluent with the proximal end of a con- 
spicuous brown seam along the distal half of vein M; the stigmal area 
includes the outer end of cell Sc, base of Sc; and a broad seam along the 
cord and outer end of cell /st Mz; wing-tip broadly and conspicuously 
infuscated, extending from cell Ry to the end of 2nd A, in cell 1st A 
continued basad along vein /st A to beyond one-third the length of the 


234 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


vein; vein Cu narrowly seamed with dark brown Venation: Sc much 
longer than Sc; r at tip of Ri; Roy; shorter than r-m; petiole of cell My, 
about two-thirds the cell; basal deflection of Cu, just before midlength 
of the cell. 


Abdomen shiny dark brown with conspicuous coppery and purple 
reflections as in the cuprea group. Ovipositor with the valves gently 
upcurved, reddish horn-color. 

Hab. New Zealand (North Island). Holotype, 9°, Ohakune, 
altitude 2018 feet, February 15, 1920 (T. Harris). 


Gynoplistia splendens belongs to the cuprea group. The 
unique type was submitted to Mr. Edwards who has kindly 
compared it with related species in the British Museum. He 
writes ‘‘Rather near tuberculata Edw. and cuprea Hutton 
but equally distinct: from both.’’ The collector states that this 
fly mimics a Hymenopterous insect, determined by the British 
Museum authorities as Prionocnemis wakefieldi Kirby. 


Macromastix flavoscapus sp. n. 


General coloration hght yellow, including the frontal pro- 
longation of the head and the first scapal segment; mesonotal 
prescutum with three brownish black stripes, the median 
stripe ending near midlength of the sclerite; each scutal lobe 
with two brownish black spots; a small spot on each side of 
scutellum; pleura yellow, in some cases with a small spot 
above the fore coxa and middle coxa; wings subhyaline, the 
costal region and stigma brownish black; wing-tip narrowly 
darkened; abdomen yellow, the tergites with three narrow 
black stripes. Male—Length 12.5 mm.; wing 18 mm. 

Female.—Length 12 mm.; wing 18.5 mm. 

Frontal prolongation of the head entirely light yellow, only the tip 
of the slender nasus a little darkened; palpi black. Antenne short in 


both sexes; first scapal segment entirely light yellow; remainder of 
antennez black. Head hght yellow, unmarked. 


Pronotum yellow, unmarked. Mesonotal praescutum orange-yellow 
with three brownish black stripes, the lateral stripes remote from the 
median stripe, the latter tending to be evanescent behind, always indi- 
cated on the anterior half of sclerite, replaced by deep orange posteriorly; 
scutum yellow, each lobe with two black areas, the largest lying more 
proximad and caudad; scutellum orange-yellow with a small black 
spot on the caudal margin on either side of the median lobe; postnotum 
orange-yellow. Pleura orange-yellow; in some cases a small black spot 
above the fore and one above the mid-coxa. Halteres brown, the 
extreme base of the stem yellow, the knobs darker brown. Legs with 


1922] Alexander: Crane-Flies from New Zealand 235 


the coxee orange-yellow; hind and mid trochanters brownish black; 
fore trochanters yellow with a black spot on the lower face: remainder 
of the legs black, the fore femora narrowly yellow basally. Wings nearly 
hyaline, the extreme tip clouded with darker; cells C, Sc and the stigma 
dark brownish black; veins black. Venation: r present; petiole of cell 
M, variable in length, sometimes longer than r-m, in some cases entirely 
lacking. 

Abdomen light yellow, the tergites with three narrow black longi- 
tudinal stripes, the median stripe narrower than the yellow sublateral 
stripes; caudal margin of tergite seven and all of segments eight and 
nine black; sternites with a narrow median stripe. ' 


Hab. New Zealand. Holotype, %, exact locality unknown 
(J. W. Campbell). Allotopotype, 2. Paratopotype, &. 


Macromastix atroflava, sp. n. 


General coloration orange-yellow; antennz and palpi black; 
a capillary black line on vertex; mesonotal prescutum with 
three stripes; legs black, the coxe and trachanters orange; 
wings subhyaline, the costal region and stigma dark brown; 
abdomen yellow, the tergites with three, narrow, black, longi- 
tudinal stripes. Male.—Length 11.5-12 mm.; wing 16 mm. 
Female.—Length 11 mm.; wing 14 mm. 


Frontal prolongation of the head yellow, the nasus and a linear 
triangle behind it, black; palpi black. Antenne dark brownish black 
throughout. Head yellow with an elongate, capillary dark brown 
streak on vertex. 

Pronotum entirely light yellow. Mesonotal prescutum orange- 
yellow with three conspicuous black stripes that are narrowly margined 
with brown; in the paratype, and less distinctly in the allotype, the 
stripes are entirely black; median stripe narrowed behind, not attaining 
the suture; lateral stripes narrower, crossing the suture and suffusing 
the lateral margins of the scutal lobes; remainder of mesonotum 
orange-yellow, immaculate. Pleura orange-yellow, immaculate, the 
dorso-pleural region light yellow. Halteres dark brown, the base of the 
stem narrowly orange. Legs with the cox and trochanters orange; 
remainder of legs black. Wings subhyaline, the costal region and stigma 
dark brown, this including cells C, Sc, Sc; and the stigma; wing-tip, in 
cells Ro, R3, and R; very indistinctly darkened; veins dark brown, 
slender. Venation: Rs about one-third longer than Ro,3: petiole of 
cell M, very short, about equal to or a little longer than, r; basal 
deflection of Cu, just before midlength of cell /st Mo. 

Abdomen yellow, the basal tergite orange, the caudal margin of 
the other tergites except the last two, narrowly orange; tergites nar- 
rowly trilineate with black, the broad, yellow, sublateral stripes from 
two to three times as wide as the mid-dorsal black stripe; segments 
eight and nine black. 


236 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


Hab. New Zealand (South Island). Holotype, #, Blackball, 
West Coast, December 1916 (J. W. Campbell). Allotopotype, @, 
December, 1917. Paratopotype, Sex?, with the type. 


Macromastix lunata fuscolatera, subsp. n. 
Female.—Length about 12 mm.; wing 16.5 mm. 
In general appearance, very similar to M. /unata Hutton, 
differing as follows: 


Head and thorax with the erect, pale hairs much less conspicuous 
than in /unata, these being short and subappressed. . 

Head dark brown, the lateral margins of the vertex adjoining the 
eyes broadly ochreous. Mesonotal preescutum light gray with three 
distinct, dark brown stripes, the broad median stripe narrowly split by 
a capillary pale line; scutal lobes with dark centers; remainder of 
mesonotum and the pleura light gray. Legs with the coxe gray; tro- 
chanters yellow; femora and tibiz light yellowish brown, the tips dark; 
tarsi dark brown. Wings brown, the stigma darker; wing-tip entirely 
dark; an interrupted subhyaline, lunate band in cell M, the proximal 
end barely extending into cell R, the distal end occupying the outer end 
of cell R, this subhyaline band narrowly interrupted across cell M; cell 
R» clear except the extreme outer angle; basal half of cell R; subhyaline; 
bases of cells Cu, 1st A and 2nd A pale. Venation: cell 2nd A narrower 
than in Junata. 

Abdomen with the four basal tergites dull rufous, with three very 
broad and conspicuous blackish stripes; extreme lateral margins of 
these tergites, and the succeeding segments, dusted with gray, more 
whitish on the lateral margins of tergites five and six. In typical lunata, 
the erect setze on the head and thorax are much more conspicuous; 
basal abdominal tergites unmarked except medially; basal half of ter- 
gite two elear gray, in marked contrast to the posterior half and the 
other basal tergites. I have before me one of Hutton’s paratypes of 
lunata, through the kindness of Mr. R. Speight. It is possible that the 
male of this species will be found to have short antennz, in which case 
the form would take full specific rank. 


Hab. New Zealand (North Island). Holotype, 9, Mt. 
Ruapehu, alpine zone, 4000-5000 feet, January, 1921 (M. N. 
Waitt). “In thick bush.” 


Macromastix intermedia, sp. n. 


General color gray, the preescutum with four brown stripes; 
wings comparatively long and narrow, dark brown, with a 
subhyaline vitta extending from before midlength of the wing 
in cells R and M, through the bases of cells R. and R; to the 
margin, narrowly interrupted along the cord; cells M,, 2nd M, 


1922] Alexander: Crane-Flies from New Zealand 237 


and M/; pale; abdomen beyond the basal segment dark grayish 
brown throughout. Male—Length about 9 mm.; wing 14 
mm. 


Frontal prolongation of the head gray, more brownish laterally; 
nasus very long; palpi dark brown. Antennz very short, brown. Head 
grayish brown, paler gray adjoining the inner margin of the eyes. 

Mesonotal preescutum gray with four brown stripes, the intermediate 
pair only narrowly separated by a capillary line; scutum pale buff, each 
lobe with a brown discal area; scutellum and postnotum pale buff. 
Pleura gray. Halteres dark brown. Legs with the coxe gray; tro- 
chanters brownish yellow; remainder of the legs broken Wings com- 
paratively long and narrow, more than four and one-half times as long 
as wide; dark brown with a conspicuous, subhyaline, vittate pattern, 
this appearing as a lunate area in the outer end of cell M, including also 
the distal end of R and the proximal end of /st M2; bases of cells Re 
and k; rather narrowly pale; cells My, 2nd M,) and M3 and the bases 
of cells Cu, 1st A and 2nd A are much paler than the ground-color; 
veins dark brown. Venation: Basal section of M3,4 subequal to basal 
section of M,,2; petiole of cell M, about equal to m; cells Mi, 2nd Mo, 
M; and Cu deeper than in M. alexanderi Edw.; cell 2nd A narrower 
than in alexanderi but wider than in M. vittata Edw. 

Abdomen dark grayish brown throughout, only the basal tergite a 

little paler; ninth tergite of male hypopygium with a deep notch. 


Hab. New Zealand. Holotype, 3%, exact locality unknown 
(J. W. Campbell). 


Macromastix hudsoniana, sp. n. 


Size small (wing of @ under 10 mm.); antenne of male 
longer than body; general coloration pale brown, the prescu- 
tum quadrivittate with darker brown; thorax without con- 
spicuous erect setae; wings with a brown tinge, cells C, Sc and 
the stigma darker brown. Male.—Length 7 mm.; wing 9.5 mm.; 
antenna 10 mm. 


Frontal prolongation of head brown; palpi dark brown. Antenne 
of male elongate, greatly exceeding the body, dark brownish black 
throughout; first flagellar segment a little longer than the combined 
scapal segments, only indistinctly separated from the second flagellar 
segment; flagellar segments beyond the third gradually decreasing in 
length, the last segment very small, subglobular; flagellar segments 
six to nine each with a pair of long, verticillate bristles immediately 
before midlength. Head brown, more grayish adjoining the inner 
margin of the eyes. 

Mesonotal preescutum pale brownish testaceous with four darker 
brown stripes; scutum similar, the lobes darker brown; scutellum and 
postnotum brownish testaceous; mesonotum subglabrous. Pleura pale 


238 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


grayish pruinose. Halteres brown, the knobs a little darker. Legs 
with the coxe and trochanters brown; femora, tibiz and metatarsi 
light brown, the tips dark brown; remainder of tarsi dark brown. 
Wings with a strong brown tinge; cells C and Sc, and the stigma, darker 
brown; veins dark brown. Venation: Rs rather long, about one-third 
longer than Ro,3; basal section of Re about one-third the distal section; 
petiole of cell M, longer than the cell; basal deflection of Cu, fused with 
M at about two-fifths the length of cell 1st M2; cell 2nd A compar- 
atively narrow. 

Abdomen uniformly dark brown, the hypopygium and preceding 
segment brighter. 


Hab. New Zealand (South Island). Holotype, #, Port Hills, 
Banks Peninsula, Canterbury, February 8, 1917. 

Macromastix hudsoniana is distinguished from all described 
species by the combination of small size, subglabrous thorax 
and elongate male antenne. It is named in honor of the 
veteran student of New Zealand Tipulide, George V. Hudson 
to whom I am indebted for many favors. 


THE SYRPHID GENERA HAMMERSCHMIDTIA 
AND BRACHYOPA IN CANADA. 


By C. HowarD CURRAN, 
Orillia, Ontario. 


In presenting the present paper the author must offer 
apologies for its evident incompleteness, as it has been found 
impossible in the short time available to complete the drawings 
so necessary to illustrate the distinctive characters in a genus 
which is evidently somewhat confusing. A paper on the 
genus Sphegina was practically completed, with the necessary 
drawings, when it was learned that Dr. C. L. Metcalf already 
had a paper prepared on this genus, and it was therefore 
decided to review the genera indicated in the title, in so far 
as they are known in North America, with especial reference 
to the Canadian species. 

According to my observations it is essential, in dealing with 
the majority of genera of Syrphide which occur in Canada, 
to include practically all the North American species, in any 
discussion which relates to their classification. For this reason 
the scope of the present paper is larger than the title may 
indicate. 

Both Hammerschmidtia and Brachyopa, as genera, cannot 
be looked upon as well represented in most collections, although 
it seems that none of the species can be regarded as actually 
rare, and are, with the exception of B. gigas, probably of general 
distribution, and occur over the greater part of the United 
States and Canada. In Ontario I have records of six species 
of Brachyopa and one species of Hammerschnudtia. While 
the genitalia are not discussed in the present paper, they have 
been studied, and in every case bear out the apparent specific 
limitations. 


Brachyopa Meigen. 


Medium sized flies; head narrower than the thorax; face mod- 
erately produced downwards and forwards, concave, not tuberculate; 
antennz short, third joint oval, rarely more roundish; arista basal, 
bare, pubescent or short plumose; eyes touching for a greater or less 
distance, bare: front in female narrowed above. Thorax a little nar- 
rowed in front, usually with some stouter hairs on the meospleure 


£39 


240) Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


above, on the postalar callosities and on the margin of the scutellum, 
which is rather large, squarish or more or less triangular. Abdomen 
roughly triangular in shape, broader, and not much longer than the 
thorax, broadest at the second segment, thence quickly narrowing to 
the apex, but less so in the female. Legs simple, the femora a little 
strengthened, and usually with short bristles below, especially the hind 
pair. Wings longer than the abdomen, anterior cross-vein before the 
middle of the discal cell, first posterior cell ending in an acute angle 
near the apex of the wing. Squame of medium size. 


GENERIC RELATIONSHIP AND LIMITATION. 


It seems that this genus cannot really claim close relationship 
to other genera found in North America, although certain 
characters indicate a common origin with several genera. 
In Europe it is even more isolated. I cannot agree that 
Hammerschmidtia is very closely related, because in that 
genus the wing venation is quite distinct, the face bears a 
distinct tubercle in the male, the tibie are all armed with 
spines, as are the femora, and the thorax and scutellum bear 
strong bristles. The fact that both may possess plumose 
arista does not constitute a close affinity. 

It is perhaps as well to clear up the question of these two 
genera here. I would distinguish between them as follows: 
In Hammerschmidtia the abdomen is slender, twice as long as 
the thorax; the face is tuberculate in the male; thorax armed 
with very evident spines; the legs are arméd with spines and 
the anterior four tibia terminate in a row of bristles; the 
first posterior. cell is not acute, and ends well from the apex 
of the wing. In Brachyopa the abdomen is triangular, only 
a little longer than the thorax, the face is concave in both 
sexes, the thorax has sometimes very small bristles, the legs 
may have spines below the femora, but not elsewhere; the first 
posterior cell is acute and ends near the apex of the wing. 
Thus it will be seen that even leaving the plumosity of the 
arista out of consideration, there are ample grounds for 
separating the two genera. 

The genus which appears to be most closely allied to 
Brachyopa is Chalcomyia, notwithstanding the separated eyes 
in the latter genus. The shape of the abdomen is very similar, 
the eyes of several species of Brachyopa are not actually con- 
tiguous, the facial profile is more similar, and the wing venation 
is identical. Moreover, I have taken representatives of both 


1922] Curran: Hammerschmidtia and Brachypoda 241 


genera together, and both occur early in the season. Myvzolepta 
is probably closer to Brachyopa than is Hammerschmidtia, as is 
demonstrated by the maculation of the wings, the venation, 
and the facial profile of the females, but it differs in having the 
slender abdomen, as in Hammerschmidtia, except in M. bella 
Will., from the Pacific coast. 


BIOLOGY. 

I have not observed the immature stages of any species of 
Brachyopa, but according to Lundbeck, they are fairly well 
known. In Diptera~ Danica, part v, pp. 386-7, -Lundbeck 
deals extensively with what had previously been published 
regarding the developmental stages. The conclusion arrived 
at (and bearing his own observations) is as follows: That 
the larve live in sap exuding from trees; the eggs are laid in 
the spring of the year, and the larve pass the summer feeding 
upon the sap, and hibernate in the autumn; pupation takes 
place in the spring, and the life cycle is completed with the 
emergence of the adult; there is only one brood. That this 
applies to the American species is borne out by what hag 
already been published on the subject, and also by my own 
observations regarding the occurrence of the flies. 


HABITAT AND HABITS OF THE ADULTS. 


Both Verrall (British Flies, Vol. VIII) and Lundbeck 
state that the adults occur about exuding sap, upon which 
they apparently feed. While I have never observed them 
in such places I must say that the woods in which I found them 
so abundant in 1921 was in process of extermination, and 
hundreds of tree trunks were exuding sap. Muscids were 
swarming around these when I examined them in April in the 
hope of finding Merapioidus villosus. Also in the other woods 
where I took specimens many trees had exuding sap. 

The species of Brachyopa all occur early in the season and 
specimens taken after the middle of June in Ontario must 
be looked upon as unusual captures. Duzing 1921 I was 
able to do considerable collecting during May and June, and 
collected on Wild Plum and several species of Wild Cherry 
for the first time, which resulted in many things new to me, 
including six species of Brachyopa, one of which proved to be 
undescribed. The first specimen was captured on May 4th, 


242 Annals Entomological Seciety of America  [Vol. XV, 


and was teneral. It was taken on wild black cherry. I had 
observed several specimens on plum blossom in a neighbor’s 
garden about a week earlier. It is therefore safe to say that 
specimens may be looked for from the time plum begins to 
bloom, until towards the latter part of June. Choke cherry 
bloom followed the black cherry, and while not as productive, 
a stray specimen was taken. The vast majority, however, were 
taken in open, sub-swampy woods on bloom of Asmorrhiza 
clatoni, and in a single hour I captured over forty specimens, 
including four species. Where they appeared from so suddenly 
I cannot imagine, as I had collected in the same spot for several 
days previously without a sign of one. This was in June, 
and by the 14th they had disappeared entirely, having been 
present for less than a week. 

The adults are rather peculiar in habit, and invariably 
appear to arrive on a blossom from nowhere. Only one speci- 
men was observed arriving on bloom and it appeared to fly 
quickly, and settle solidly at once and commence feeding. 
They are diligent feeders, and hence are usually easy to capture. 
Unlike H. ferruginea, they frequently are found high up on a 
Lee: 


DISTRIBUTION. 


In Ontario I have taken six of the ten known species, and 
in view of the fact that some of these are recorded from the 
Pacific coast, while others are supposedly more or less southern, 
I conclude that all the species may be expected to occur at 
least in the northern States and Canada, with the exception 
that B. gigas Lovett probably occurs only in the Rockies and 
west. B. media was described from California, but occurs 
in Ontario, while B. notata, originally described from New 
Hampshire, occurs in British Columbia, Oregon and Wash- 
ington Territory. 


CHARACTERS USED IN CLASSIFICATION. 


Several of the characters which might be used in classification 
are not employed here because they are often open to dispute 
and may cause confusion. One such character is the pilosity 
of the arista, which may vary somewhat in the same species, 
as is the case in the British Columbia specimen of B. notata, 
which has the pile distinctly longer than in any of the eastern 
specimens which are before me. While the structure of the 


1922} Curran: Hammerschmidtia and Brachypoda 243 


genitalia in the male is of great importance and of unusual 
value in this genus, as has been explained, they are not employed 
in the descriptions, as it is my belief that they must be demon- 
strated by means of drawings to be of greatest value, especially 
when the use of this character is still in its infancy. 

The characters chiefly used are the color of the thorax and 
abdomen, and it may be safely said that this is sufficiently 
stable to permit of identification with certainty; and moreover, 
the structure of the hypopygia bears out the specific limitations 
in every case where I have males. I am therefore able to state 
that at present the only species of which there might be any 
doubt are B. media, flavescens and rufiabdominalts, all of which 
are closely related to B. bicolor of Europe. I do, however, 
believe the species mentioned above to be distinct, although 
one of the American species may be B. bicolor. Dr. Johnson* 
also remarked upon the constancy of the thoracic lines and 
abdvminal coloration. It-frequently happens that the terminal 
abdominal segments may appear darkened, but this is due to 
internal coloration and not to the pigmentation of the chitinous 
material. 


TABLE OF SPECIES. 


1. Second and third abdominal segments with posterior pollinose bands........ 2. 
Secondsandethindssegments without such bands: 2444.05 60.6 Gee ee see aes 
2. Thorax. with anterior median darker stripes and interrupted sublateral 
stripes; all the abdominal.segments with roundish shining spots on each 
siden Geencth=aboutmommmahe. od... ceeeeeno ces st cee ceeme cynops Snow. 
tIn addition to the stripes as in cynops, the thorax with a roundish spot at 
inner ends of the suture and a slightly oblique stripe on each side 
- posteriorly, second and fourth segments entirely shining anteriorly, 
diversa Johns. 


See Nd OMmententinelya DlaGk erm nraet ee -1. 0 mares os octs lan Heme daeckei Johns. 
Abdomen ferruginous, yellowish, or partly yellow........................ 4, 
4. Last two or three segments shining black; second segment chiefly trans- 
iitcenitm yell Owls lamersercp rss sa Is TSR ctr saree Pane ga erat vacua O. S: 
NCOmMenEUOtISOMmMaClIlated=eetiaden = ocean a eicsiei atta tonic eae ae 5. 
5. Abdomen with median longitudinal stripe, interrupted before the sutures or 
EMIS? Or Geis, Chiguincaky jolurankoOsS ages sce coma occdsdemencoe Hoenn dee Aen. 6. 
Abdomen without median lonsatudinalastripesrrn one cere aero tees 8. 
6. Thorax grayish black or slaty; abdomen luteous............. perplexa Curr. 
(horaxsternucimoussomnyellowishhrede. jase creer soc see eae es Ue 
7. Thorax and abdomen ferruginous (about 10 mm.)................ gigas Lovett 
Thorax more yellowish red, with lighter stripes; color of abdomen more 
Cleary Cll Ove (Spanatadsy) haeetratce he tatece tame e oi Mea clone ndae we oe ussite, txe0 ee notata O. S. 
8. Thorax reddish yellow; at any rate not at all blackish on the posterior 
Ine DU Ree ietcere ee Recerca OR aceon aah PRE) ch eglaty ep ra euayen Beet flavescens Shan. 
Mihonaxailackishiniy eae ctsite ehrat: we. Le Sao oh ate sn a amt ae aces ya ee ate 9: 


9. Eyes narrowly separated, most nearly contiguous near the ocelli, 
rufiabdominalis Jones 
Eyes distinctly contiguous, the vertical triangle long and narrow. .media Will. 


*€an. Ent, Vol. XEULXs p: 361; (917): . 


+The character of most importance here is the color of the abdomen. Snow's 
description of thorax was incomplete. 


244 Annals Entomological Society of America  [Vol. XV, 


Brachyopa cynops Snow. 


Length 5mm. Female. Head light yellowish brown, largely con- 
cealed beneath glistening pollen; the shining ground color shows just 
above the antenne and in a stripe on the cheeks, extending from the 
eye to the mouth opening. Antenne wanting. Dorsum of thorax 
brown, covered with grayish pollen, anteriorly with two approximated 
linear blackish stripes; laterally with a broad interrupted stripe. 
Scutellum light brown, with yellowish pollen. Abdomen but little 
longer than broad; yellowish gray pollinose; second segment with a 
circular brown spot on the anterior corners; the two following segments 
are marked with corresponding elliptical spots, and, in the middle 
anterior border with a triangular spot; on the fifth segment are two 
small round spots. Legs uniformly reddish brown, with light colored 
pollen and short whitish pile. Wing hyaline, distinctly clouded at 
anterior cross-vein, on the veins at the anterior outer corner of the 
discal cell and on the ultimate section of the fourth vein; posterior 
cross-vein about as long as the ultimate section of the fourth vein, the 
included angle obtuse. One specimen, Colorado. (Snow). 


Snow does not state the sex, but the figure is that of a 
female; also the figure shows the posterior oblique stripes on 
the thorax as in diversa, but not the spot inside the suture. 


Brachyopa diversa Johnson. 


Abdomen with grayish yellow pollinose posterior bands, the second 
segment chiefly pollinose. 

Length, 6 to8 mm. Male. Face and front brownish red, covered 
with whitish pollen which leavse the oral margin in front, a spot above 
the antenne and a stripe on the cheeks, shining brownish. Antennz 
brownish red, the first joint darker, shining. Vertical triangle blackish, 
with short brown pile; posterior orbits brownish red, pollinose, with 
whitish pile. In profile the face is concave above, a little convex below, 
prominent below, and moderately produced downwards. Eyes prac- 
tically touching, the vertical triangle long and narrow. Dorsum of 
thorax grayish pollinose, leaving shining brownish stripes as follows: 
a median pair on the anterior two-thirds, an interrupted stripe on each 
side of these, and the sides of the dorsum, a slender median one in 
front of the scutellum, slightly oblique ones running from the corners 
of the scutellum to just outside the ends of the antero-median stripes, 
and a spot on the inner ends of the suture. Pleuree brownish red, with 
lighter pollen. Pile of the dorsum black, but with yellowish pile between 
the humeri and across the posterior margin; pleuree with yellowish pile, 
a cluster of black hairs on the upper part of the mesopleure. Scutellum 
reddish, yellowish pilose, with a few longer, but not bristly hairs on the 
margin. Abdomen shining black, the first and second segments grayish 
vellow pollinose; second segment with a median longitudinal line, not 
reaching the posterior margin, and an oval spot, reaching the sides, on 
the anterior portion, shining black; third and fourth segments shining 


1922] Curran: Hammerschmidtia and Brachypoda 245 


black, with the hind margins grayish yellow pollinose, the pollen 
extending forward in the middle to the anterior third, but there is a 
roundish notch centrally in front, corresponding to the median stripe on 
the second segment. Hypopygium yellowish red. Abdomen with light 
yellow pile, longer basally. Legs black, anterior four trochanters, tips of 
the femora, the anterior ones beneath apically, basal third of tibize, tips 
of the tibiz and tips of the farsal joints, luteous or yellow. Wings 
slightly yellowish anteriorly, the veins all a little crowded, the region 
of the anterior cross vein and a streak between the spurious vein and 
the fourth vein beyond the cross-vein, brownish; wings more yellowish 
basally. 

Female. Front golden yellow pollinose, leaving the ocelli and a 
streak in front shining black, a large area above the antenne, cut off 
truncately above, and the face below, on the sides, shining yellowish, 
although the lower part of the face is slightly pubescent. The pollen on 
the thorax and abdomen is more yellow; fifth abdominal segment 
yellow pollinose, except an anterior broadly interrupted cross-band; 
third antennal joint broader, a little darker. 


Description drawn from 9 specimens, taken at Orillia on 
May 5dth to 18th, 1921. 

This species is easily distinguished from the preceding by 
the less pollinose abdomen, as the anterior half of the median 
segments is wholly shining, whereas in cynops there are very 
distinct oval shining spots on the anterior angles, the balance 
of the segment being shining. 


Brachyopa vacua 0. 5S. 


Anabaes with the second segment pallidly yellowish, the apical 
segments shining blackish. 

Length, 7 to ‘9mm. Male. Face and front of a dirty yellowish color, 
clothed with whitish pollen, which leaves a brown stripe on the cheeks 
and an area above the antenne shining. Antenne colored as the face, 
arista black, and almost bare. Vertical triangle long, the eyes touching 
for only a short distance, a distinct median groove in front of the ocellar 
triangle, which is brownish; occiput with grayish pollen and head with 
entirely pale pile. Dorsum of thorax obscured by grayish yellow pollen, 
which leaves the usual double median stripe, an interrupted stripe on 
each side and a spot above the wings, brownish. The pleure are fer- 
ruginous, the sternum blackish, but thickly whitish pollinose. Pile of 
thorax yellowish on the dorsum, whitish on pleuree. Scutellum luteous 
yellow, subtranslucent, squarish, with short, white pile. First abdom- 
inal segment brown, the anterior angles yellowish, the whole whitish 
pollinose; second segment except the apical sixth, the lateral margin 
posteriorly and a median dash, usually not reaching the black posterior 
border, shining yellowish. The rest of the abdomen, except the small 
anterior angles of the third segment, which are yellowish, shining 
brownish black. Pile wholly white. Legs brownish, the femora thinly 


246 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


whitish pollinose; cox, trochanters and bases of the femora narrowly, 
tips of the femora, bases of the tibize and their tips and the first one or 
two tarsal joints more or less yellowish or luteous. Hind femora a little 
produced beneath near the end. Wings a little darkened, yellowish 
basally. 

Female. Similar. Front, except the shining yellowish area above the 
antennez which is thinly whitish pollinose, brownish, and with reddish 
brown or grayish pollen. (Neither of my specimens have the front as 
light colored as indicated in Osten Sacken’s description.) One male 
has the narrow, irregular anterior margin of the third abdominal seg- 
ment yellow, and the thorax a little more brownish. 


It is probable that the type specimen was. teneral.— The 
species was originally described from Quebec, but since that 
time, except for a single specimen recorded by Williston from 
California, it has apparently not been recorded. The above 
description is drawn from eight specimens taken at Orillia, 
May 4th to 30th, 1921. 

This species cannot well be confused with any other in the 
genus. 

Brachyopa daeckei Johnson. 


“Length, 6 mm. Front black, grayish pollinose, a shining spot 
above the base of the antennz, yellow, bordered with black; face below 
the antennz grayish pollinose, sides shining, yellow, with two spots 
of black, antenne dark yellow, arista brown. Thorax black, grayish 
pollinose, with five sub-shining lines, the three inner ones slightly 
diverging, but not reaching the scutellum. Pleurz brownish grayish 
pollinose, scutellum brown, the apical half much lighter than the base. 
Abdomen black, shining, hairs white. Legs brown, hairs white, outer 
half of the posterior femora blackish, tarsi yellowish; halteres yellow. 
Wings hyaline, veins brown, stigma yellow, anterior cross-vein slightly 
clouded with brown, tegule white. 

‘““One specimen, Castle Rock, Delaware County, Pa., May 19, 1902, 
collected by Mr. V. A. E. Daecke. This specimen has been referred 
to as a dark variety of B. media (Psyche, Vol. XVII, p. 230, 1910) but 
further study in connection with the following species convinces me 
that it is “distinet.”’ (Johnson): 


Brachyopa rufiabdominalis Jones. 


“Length, 7mm. Face light reddish brown, prominently produced 
forward, with light, silvery, glistening pollen and very fine white 
pubescence; slightly concave beneath the antennze; frontal triangle 
shining, prominent, with or without a median suture. Cheeks a little 
darker red than the face and with a shining stripe from the eye to the 
oral margin; sparsely covered with long white pile. Antennz situated 
on a semi-conical projection, of the same general color as the face, but 
slightly darker; first joint about half as long as the second, of a slightly 


1922] Curran: Hammerschmidtia and Brachypoda 247 


deeper red than the third, dorsally, with a tuft of black hairs on each 
joint; third joint light red, about as long as the first two together, 
ovate; arista basal, bare. Vertex black, frontal portion with or without 
silvery pollen, eyes narrowly separated. Dorsum of thorax brown, 
with black pile, covered with grayish pollen, anteriorly with two 
approximate dorso-medial blackish stripes, laterally with a broad 
interrupted stripe; the transverse suture deep, shining; humeri with a 
reddish spot; pleurz reddish brown; a reddish brown stripe extending 
from the scutellum to the base of the wing. Scutellum light reddish 
brown, beset with blackish and reddish pile, shining, with a very narrow 
median light stripe; abdomen slightly longer than the thorax, but little 
longer than wide, light reddish brown and entirely shining, with reddish 
pile; the posterior portions of segments one, two and three with a 
posterior shining, brownish, transverse band, either entire or interrupted 
in the middle. Legs of the same color as the abdomen, principally 
with light colored pile, on the under side of the hind femora and the 
apex of the anterior four femora with stout black pile; tarsi darker 
brown, light at apex; hind basitarsi slightly thickened at base and 
thence gradually tapering to apex. Wings hyaline with a reddish 
tinge, anterior cross-vein before the middle of the discal cell and almost 
rectangular. (Colorado). (Jones). 


“B. rufiabdominalis differs from B. cynops in that the scutellum 
and abdomen are entirely shining, etc. Differs from B. bicolor of 
Europe in that the occiput of the latter is pale gray and with eray 
pile, the face is without pubescence, the eyes touch for about one-third 
the distance from the ocelli to the antennz; the scutellum has eight 
long marginal hairs and is covered with short black pile, while in rufi- 
abdominalis the occiput is black, whitish pollinose and has black and 
whitish pile; the face has fine whitish pubescence on it; the eyes are 
distinctly separated, the nearest point of contingency being immediately 
below the ocelli; the scutellum has black pile dorsally, and the remainder 
is covered with reddish pile and lacks the eight black marginal 
bristles.”” (Adapted from Jones). For further remarks see B. media 
Will. 


Brachyopa media Will. 


Small, dorsum of thorax blackish or slaty, abdomen reddish yellow, 
the hind borders of the segments narrowly brownish; front in female 
brownish. 

Length, 6 to 7 mm. Male. Face and front reddish yellow, the 
cheeks and most of the frontal triangle shining, elsewhere whitish 
pollinose. Antenne reddish yellow, arista black, its base reddish. 
Vertical triangle long, narrow, the eyes touching for only a short 
distance; occiput brownish above. Dorsum of thorax blackish or 
brownish black, the sides usually reddish, covered with whitish yellow 
pollen, leaving a median double stripe, and an interrupted stripe on 
each side, brownish; humeri yellowish; pleuree reddish brown above, 
brownish below, thinly whitish pollinose. Scutellum reddish yellow. 
Pile of thorax and scutellum yellowish, on the pieurze whitish. Abdomen 


248 Annals Entomological Society of America  [Vol. XV, 


reddish yellow, more reddish apically; second, third and fourth segments 
and their lateral margins, except anteriorly, very narrowly brownish 
or reddish brown; pile short, yellowish. Legs yellowish, including the 
coxe; hind tibiz with a slightly darker pre-apical band; hind tarsi 
brownish. Wings very slightly darkened with luteous, the tip a little 
blackened. 

Female. Face shining, except below the antenne; front blackish 
above, whitish pubescent except a median longitudinal shining stripe 
connecting with the shining area above the antenne; pollen of the 
thorax more whitish; wings almost hyaline; legs somewhat paler. 
Otherwise as in the male. 


B. media was originally described from California from a 
single female specimen. I have before me a female from 
Teulon, Manitoba, May 15, 1920, and two males taken at 
Orillia, Ontario, on May 30, 1921. 

The specimens described above agree perfectly with Willis- 
ton’s description and I consider them absolutely typical. 
B. rufiabdominalis agrees fairly well with the above description, 
but the color appears to be darker and the eyes are narrowly 
separated and approach each other near the ocelli which would 
make the vertical triangle short, while in media the vertical 
triangle is long and the eyes touch nearer the antennal base 
than the ocelli. The only other species which is really con- 
fusing is flavescens, which has a wholly pale thorax (Johnston 
says the thorax may be brown before the suture) and a yellowish 
front in the female. The face is also more concave. I believe 
these three species are abundantly distinct, but a large series 
of all the species, and a comparison of the male genitalia will 
be necessary to definitely determine this point. A com- 
parison with B. bicolor is necessary. Strangely enough Jones 
did not even mention media in establishing his B. rufiabdomt- 
nalis, which seems rather strange in view of the fact that only 
the female of the former had been described. 


Brachyopa flavescens Shannon. 


Thorax wholly reddish yellow (or brownish before the suture— 
Johnson); abdomen with narrow posterior segmental margins brownish. 

Length, 3.75 to6 mm. Female. Face, except below the antenne, 
lower part of the front, and a slender median frontal stripe, shining 
reddish yellow; front yellow pollinose, face with whitish pollen except 
where shining. Occiput above darkish, with whitish pollen; face a 
little more concave than in media. Thorax wholly reddish yellow, with 
the usual stripes shining. Abdomen reddish yellow, the narrow 
posterior margins of the segments brownish, their lateral margins 


1922] Curran: Hammerschmidtia and Brachypoda 249 


very narrowly or obscurely brownish on their posterior half. Legs 
yellow; hind femora, sub-base and preapical band on hind tibie and 
the hind basitarsi and last segment, brownish or darkened. Wings 
hyaline. 

“Male, rather robust, small, yellowish, eyes strongly contiguous; 
vertex yellowish gray, with pale, very short pile; vertical triangle 
narrow and acute, reaching forward to about the middle of the eyes; 
frontal triangle yellow, bare. Antennz orange-yellow; third joint 
ovate, longer than broad; arista darkened distally and with very fine 
microscopic pubescence along its entire length. Face moderately 
produced, light yellow, dusted with white and with fine white hairs, 
the lower half produced and truncate, its upper angle slightly acute. 
Mesonotum dark ocher yellow, dusted with brownish gray, at the sides 
and behind, broadly ferruginous and more shining; two narrow and 
approximated stripes medianly on the anterior two-thirds, two broad, 
anteriorly and posteriorly abbreviated stripes outwardly, hairs rather 
short and dense, yellow. Pleure brown and black, thickly dusted 
with gray; mesopleure with somewhat longer hairs than those on 
mesonotum. Scutellum convex, broadly rounded, much broader than 
long, shining ocher yellow, rather evenly punctured, with light yellow 
hairs and a few bristle-like ones on the posterior margin. Abdomen 
much broader than thorax, broadest at posterior margin of second 
segment; color light yellow, more or less stained with dark by body 
contents; second segment more or less translucent. Coxe yellow. 
Anterior and middle pairs of legs yellow, with white pile. Hund pair 
somewhat darker, the femora distally tinged with brown and with 
minute black spines along ventral surface; tibiz tinged with brown 
on distal half; first tarsal joint grayish brown, paler distally and 
ventrally. Wings hyaline, faintly smoky, without trace of maculation, 
slightly darkened distally along anterior margin; stigma yellow. Halteres 
pale yellow.” (Shannon). 


The species has been sufficiently discussed under the 
preceding species. It has been reported from Fairfax County, 
Virginia, (type locality), Massachusetts and New Hampshire 
(Johnson), and I have two female specimens from Orillia, 
Ontario, taken by myself, May 5th and 2l1st, 1921. The 
description of the female given here is made from local speci- 
mens, while the description of the male is that of Shannon. 


Brachyopa perplexa Curran. 


Closely related to B. notata, but arista not as pubescent and 
epistoma more produced; larger than B. media and with black abdominal 
markings, and the median longitudinal black line practically complete. 

Length, 6.5 to 8.5mm. Male Face and front pale yellow, thickly 
covered with white pollen, the cheeks and frontal triangle, except 
narrowly next to the eyes, shining; a brownish or ferruginous stripe 
from the eyes to the oral margin; occiput below shining ferruginous, 


250 Annals Entomological Society of America  [Vol. XV, 


but above and near the eyes, grayish pubescent. The face is con- 
siderably produced downwards and forwards; in profile moderately 
concave from the antennal base to the prominent oral margin. Antenne 
reddish yellow, third joint longer than broad, its lower end more pointed, 
not large, arista brownish, slightly noticeably pubescent. Vertical 
triangle and a narrow V on the occiput behind the ocelli, grayish yellow 
(sub-golden) pollinose, the ocellar triangle shining brown. Pile of the 
head: A few pale hairs on the cheeks, posterior orbits with long 
pale pile below, and short black pile arranged in definite rows above. 
Thorax reddish brown, the sternum more blackish, but covered with 
grayish pollen. Disc of the dorsum grayish pollinose, leaving four 
stripes of a dark reddish brown or blackish, the median ones very 
narrowly separated and expanded posteriorly to unite with the sub- 
lateral bands, which are also entire; the opaque area is strictly confined 
to the disc. A darker, thickly black pilose opaque stripe runs from 
the postalar callosity to the suture; dorsum of thorax with short black 
pile, the pleuree with longer, white pile. Scutellum brownish yellow, 
with short black pile, with a few longer, bristle-like hairs apically. 
Abdomen: First segment black, its anterior border -yellow; second 
segment pale yellow to slightly reddish yellow, with a median longi- 
tudinal black stripe narrowly separated from the anterior margin, and 
often joined to the black posterior margin or slightly separated from 
it (the mark is ! shaped, without the dot below); hind border narrowly 
black and sides of segment, except anteriorly, black; third segment 
similar, darker colored, but the median stripe entire and the lateral 
margins usually entirely blackish; fourth segment similar, but the 
lateral margins more brownish. Hypopygium yellowish red. Pile 
of abdomen fine, whitish, except on the apical half of segments two and 
three, where it is black. Legs reddish brown; tarsi all brown or blackish, 
except that the first three joints are yellow apically; hind femora 
darker on apical quarter; hind tibia darker, with a pale median band; 
anterior four tibia sometimes darker apically. Wings slightly yellowish 
tinged, stigma pale luteous. Squamze clear white, with white pile. 
Halteres slightly yellowish. In somewhat teneral specimens taken 
in early May the abdominal markings are more brownish, and in fully 
mature specimens the abdomen may be more reddish, and is always 
wholly shining. The thorax may be slightly darker or paler than 
described. 

Female. Averages .5 mm. smaller than the male. Face a little 
more deeply excavated; front shining ferruginous with a very narrowly 
interrupted whitish pollinose band below the middle; stripe on the 
cheeks only a little darker than facial color or concolorous; median 
abdominal stripe broader, complete on second, third and fourth seg- 
ments; transverse bands broader and successively narrower apically; 
fifth segment yellowish ferruginous with the narrow hind border blackish 
and the lateral margins ferruginous or brownish. The general color is 
more ferruginous than in the male. 


B. perplexa is evidently widely distributed, but it is 
impossible to state its distribution owing to its confusion with 


1922] Curran: Hammerschmidtia and Brachypoda 251 


media and notata. Altogether I took over sixty specimens at 
Orillia in 1921, between May 8th and June 14th. I have also 
specimens from Maine (C. W. Johnson). 


B. perplexa differs from notata in shorter pile on arista, 
dark thorax and abdominal markings, paler general ground 
color, more produced face, and unclouded wings. It is at once 
distinguished from media by the presence of the median line. 
From gigas it is readily distinguished by its darker thorax, 
smaller size, and less pilose arista. Dr. Johnson had also this 
species before him when he discussed B. media (Can. Ent., 
Vol. XLIX, p. 362) as is quite evident from his remarks, and 
I have two males received from him, as B. media. 


Brachyopa notata Osten Sacken. 


Arista short plumose; thorax yellowish red; abdomen with an 
interrupted median stripe. 

Length, 5.5 to 7 mm. Male. Face and front yellow, whitish 
pollinose, leaving the frontal triangle chiefly, and a broad stripe on the 
cheeks shining ferruginous. Antenne reddish yellow, third joint 
elongate oval, more pointed below; arista reddish, short plumose; 
vertical triangle tinged with brownish, with very short brownish pile; 
eyes touching for almost the same length as the vertical triangle; 
posterior orbits dull yellow, with whitish pile Thorax yellowish 
red, thinly whitish pollinose, leaving a shining double median stripe 
and sub-lateral stripe, interrupted at the suture, and the margins of 
the dorsum, shining. Pile of dorsum black, but whitish between the 
humeri. Pleurzee with yellowish pile, the long hairs on the upper 
portion of the mesopleuree may be more or less blackish, although 
usually all pale. Scutellum triangular, the apex rounded, lighter colored 
than the thorax, with black pile and some slightly longer marginal 
hairs. Abdomen yellow or reddish yellow; all the segments with a 
narrow brown posterior border, which 1s continued forward on the 
sides of the segments to near the anterior angles. In the middle, 
the second and third segments with a longitudinal dash of brown, 
not reaching the posterior brown margin; sometimes a small spot on 
the fourth segment. Pile of the abdomen pale yellowish, but black 
on the posterior half of segments two and three. Legs reddish yellow, 
the last two tarsal joints brown; anterior basitarsi, hind basitarsi with 
the two following joints, more brownish. Legs chiefly short stout 
pilose, the femora with stiff hairs below. Wings tinged with luteous 
or yellowish, the stigma luteous; a dark cloud follows the border of 
the wing from the stigma to the tip of the fourth vein, a distinct spot 
at the end of the fifth vein, and the region of all the veins dilutely 
clouded. 

Female. Front only a little narrowed above, dull yellow; a large 
shining spot above the antennz; ocellar triangle brownish; pile of front 


Deve Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


brownish; third antennal joint oval, larger than in the male; markings 
on thorax more distinct; abdominal markings a little broader, the 
median stripes complete. Legs a little darker, wings with more distinct 
clouds. 

In some specimens the terminal segments may appear brownish. 
This condition is not natural, but is caused by internal organs, or 
staining. 

B. notata has been reported in Canada from Ottawa, Ont. 
I have a male before me from Ottawa, a male from Vancouver, 
B: C., a pair trom Orono; Maine, “anda pair trom VWihite 
Mountains, N. H. Likely to be confused only with perplexa, 
from which it is readily distinguished by its pale thorax, more 
distinctly maculated wings, etc.. The male from British 
Columbia appears to be teneral, and the median stripes are 
very faint, practically wanting and the fourth segment has no 
brown hind margin, but the sides are narrowly brownish. The 
color is a little paler yellow, but darker than in most specimens 
of flavescens, from which it is readily distinguished by the larger 
scutellum and distinctly plumose arista. 


Brachyopa gigas Lovett. 


The largest known species in the genus; arista very distinctly 
plumose; thorax ferruginous yellowish; abdomen of same color, with 
four darker stripes. 

Length, 10 mm. Male. Face and front yellow, whitish pollinose, 
the cheeks and the greater part of the frontal triangle, shining, darker; 
face produced downwards and forwards. Antenne reddish yellow, 
third joint elongate oval, flattened above on the apical third or more, 
making the end appear more pointed below; arista brown, its base 
yellow, short, sparse plumose, but longer than in other species. Vertical 
triangle brown, with mixed yellow and brown pollen and short brown 
pile; occiput shining below, gray pollinose above, and with light colored 
pile. Eyes touching for moderate distance. Thorax ferruginous 
reddish, with a median double stripe and an interrupted stripe on each 
side, reaching quite to the scutellum, more brownish; a brown spot 
behind the front coxee. Scutellum concolorous with thorax. Pile 
of the thorax and scutellum black, across the front between the humeri 
and the sides of the dorsum and corners of the scutellum with yellow 
pile Abdomen ferruginous reddish, all the segments with brownish 
posterior margins, and the lateral margin entirely narrowly bordered 
with shining brown; second to fifth segments with an elongate median 
dash in front, brownish. Legs yellowish brownish, the last two tarsal 
joints brown. Wings yellowish in front, the stigma yellow. 


Originally described from Washington State from a single 
male. According to Lovett and Cole there are several specimens 


1922] Curran: Hammerschmidtia and Brachypoda 258) 


in the Collection of Washington State College. The above 
description is made from two specimens from British Columbia, 
and there are three specimens in the Canadian National Col- 
lection from British Columbia. 

A very distinct species by its large size and rather dis- 
tinctive color. The arista is most conspicuously plumose, 
and the species would be included in Hammerschmidtia in 
Europe. 


Hammerschmidtia. 


The characteristies of this genus have been sufficiently dealt with 
under Brachyopa. The species discussed below is the type of the genus, 
and possibly the only representative. 


Hammerschmidtia ferruginea, Fallen. 


Length, 9 to 11 mm. Male. Head yellowish red, antennal base, 
a median facial stripe and the cheeks shining; in profile a little excavated 
below the antenne, and a little below the middle with a longish tubercle, 
below which it is slightly retreating to the oral opening, or the face 
may be more excavated below the antenne; it is considerably produced 
downwards. Antennz shining yellowish red, arista black, its base 
reddish, plumose. Pile of occiput wholly yellowish. Thorax brownish, 
sometimes ferruginous, the side margins always ferruginous reddish, 
on each side of the middle with rather broad, posteriorly abbreviated 
grayish or silvery pollinose stripes. The pile is chiefly short, pale 
yellowish, but there are some longer, black, stout hairs behind the 
suture and on the darker stripes. There are bristle-like hairs on the 
mesopleure, in front of the suture at the side, above the base of the 
wings, on the postalar calli and the apex of the scutellum, which is 
reddish, with short black pile. The abdomen is very variable in color, 
but seems to be chiefly shining brownish with quadrate reddish or 
ferruginous spots on the anterior angles, occupying about half the 
length of the segment, and broadly separated, in mature specimens; 
or the spots may occupy most of the segment and form a complete 
anterior band, or the second segment may be entirely ferruginous. 
The fourth segment is usually all brown, except the anterior corners, 
but may be only brownish posteriorly in light colored specimens. 
The hypopygium is always light reddish to reddish. The pile is very 
short, blackish, except basally, on the anterior angles of the segments 
and on the hypopygium, where it is whitish and longer. The legs show 
the same variation in color from ferruginous brown to ferruginous, 
the hind legs always darker; four anterior coxez reddish or yellow; 
hind tibiz arcuate and paler basally; last two tarsal joints blackish. 
All the femora, which are a little thickened, the hind ones more so, are 
armed with short black spines beneath and long black bristles posteriorly 
and anteriorly; the hind tibia bear several short, stout bristles exteriorly, 
and all the tibia, the hind ones less prominently so, bear a terminal 


254 Annals Entomological Society of America |Vol. XV, 


fringe of black spines. The veins are all more or less clouded, more 
marked anteriorly; stigma brownish yellow. 

Female Facial tubercle practically wanting; front reddish, a 
little shining, a shallow median groove extending between the ocelli 
and antennal prominence; indistinctly finely wrinkled, especially above; 
thorax lighter colored; abdomen more yellowish red, the darker areas 
more restricted and more ferruginous; legs paler. Pigment of the 
wings more blackish, and a little more extensive anteriorly. Possibly 
there is as much variation as in the male. 

This description is drawn from 9 males and 1 female taken 
by myself at Orillia, May 18th to 30th. The species has been 
reported from Manitoba, B. C., Washington, and other places 
and is probably to be found | over the whole of Canada and the 
northern States. 

I do not think that H. ferruginea can be classed as a rare 
species, but it is most certainly not common in collections. 
This is, I think, due to the fact that its habits are not well 
understood. While it is true that it occurs in company with 
Brachyopa spp., it seems to have slightly different habits 
generally. JI have found it more often on very low blooms of 
choke cherry, that is about two or three feet from the ground, 
but I took one specimen on bloom about eight feet up, and 
another specimen was taken on bloom in open sub-swampy 
woods. Another peculiarity is that I have never seen the 
species flying before four o’clock in the afternoon, but this may 
be due to the fact that my collecting in May was practically 
all done after two-thirty P. M. 


Since the above paper was prepared several additional spec- 
imens belonging to these two genera have been ae 
including two additional new species. 


Brachyopa cynops Snow. 
I have examined the type of this species, and find it to be 
a female. The description covers all the essential points. The 
dorsum of the thorax is rusty yellow rather dull, the disc, occu- 
pying about half the width of the dorsum, black; the pollen is 
greyish yellow, not grey and the shining stripes are not distinct. 


Brachyopa vacua O. 5S. 
About thirty specimens from Kansas and Missouri show no 
differences from the description. 


1922] Curran: Hammerschmidtia and Brachypoda 255 


Brachyopa rufiabdominalis Jones. 

Three specimens of this species from Washington State. 
The color of the thorax is more slaty than in media, the third 
antennal segment is longer and larger. In the female the front 
is a little wider, the sides less parallel, more evidently dusted 
on the black portion and therefore appearing lighter in color. 
The legs are all reddish, the tarsi brownish red. Abdomen 
wholly rusty reddish yellow. I could not see that the eyes of 
the male differed greatly from media, but the chief difference 
seems to be in the fact that the abdomen entirely lacks any 
darker lines on the apices of the segments, more slaty color of 
the thorax and slightly larger size. My three specimens are 
all between 7.5 and 8 mm. 


Brachyopa notata O. 5S. 

Five additional specimens from Washington State and 
Idaho. These agree with the specimen mentioned from British 
Columbia, and may be distinct. Two additional specimens 
from New York agree with the eastern specimens. 


Brachyopa perplexa. 

Two additional specimens from New York State agree 
perfectly. 

Brachyopa gigas Lovett. 

A specimen from Washington State and a second from 
Idaho. 

Brachyopa basilaris n. sp. 

This species traces out to nofata in the key. It is distin- 
guished by the wholly red first two abdominal segments, the 
remaining segments being black. Female from Washington 
State. 

Brachyopa nigricauda n. sp. 

Traces out to decket Johnson in the key. Distinguished from 
that species by the presence of six shining stripes on the dorsum 
of the thorac, more reddish pleure and humeri, more exten- 
sively yellow scutellum, yellowish wings and paler legs; the 
anterior tarsi are all blackish as are the two apical segments 
of the remaining tarst. 

The descriptions of these two species will be published in 
the Kansas University Science Bulletin during the current year. 

I have also examined a male specimen of Brachyopa bicolor 
Fallen, from Europe and can say definitely that none of our 
North American species is conspecific. 


A CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE 
INTERNAL ANATOMY OF TRICHOPTERA.* 


By Haze ELISABETH BRANCH, 
Wichita, Kansas. 


NERVOUS SYSTEM. T 


The nervous system of the trichopterous larve is comparatively 
primitive and agrees with that of the lepidopterous larve in the number 
of pairs of ganglia and also resembles, in some respects, the arrangement 
in relation to the body segments. Exclusive of the ganglia in the head, 
which are normal in number and position, there are three pairs for the 
thorax and eight pairs for the nine abdominal segments, the seventh 
abdominal segment being the most posterior in which ganglia are found. 


In the head of Limnophilus indivisus the supra-cesophageal ganglia 
are situated with their anterior margin on a line immediately posterior 
to the eyes. The combined width of the ganglia is about one-half that 
of the head. Each ganglion gives off laterally and in a forward direc- 
tion, an optic nerve which branches to supply each of the simple eyes 
of the visual area. In front of the junction of the two ganglia is the 
frontal ganglion, small and shield shaped, connected to the supra- 
oesophageal ganglia by a pair of arms. Proceeding from each arm of the 
frontal ganglion, close to its attachment with the supra-cesophageal 
ganglion, is a nerve which extends forward and sends an outer branch to 
the labrum, and an inner branch to the dorsal region of the buccal 
cavity, see Plate XIV, Figs. 4 and 5, at lb; and b. Between the point 
of attachment of the arm of the frontal ganglion with the supra-cesoph- 
ageal ganglion, and the optic lobe, (opt), is the slender antennal nerve 
rising from the anterior margin of the ganglion and possessing a fellow 
in like position upon the other ganglion, see Plate XIV, Figs. 4 and 5 
at ant. Upon its posterior face, each ganglion gives rise to a pro- 
tuberance from which issues a nerve that converges toward its fellow 
and meets it upon a median line. At this union a _ small 
ganglion is formed and to this are also joined, the nerves 
coming from the sympathetic ganglia. These sympathetic ganglia are 
single, one upon each side of the cesophagus and possessing a nerve 
connection with the posterior protuberance of the supra-cesophageal 
ganglion of its respective side, See Plate XIV, Figs. 4 and 5. 

The recurrent nerve of the frontal ganglion extends in a posterior 
direction between the supra-cesophageal ganglia and the cesophagus 


* A contribution from the Department of Entomology, Cornell University, 
prepared under the supervision of Dr. O. A. Johannsen, to whom and also to Dr. 
J. G. Needham and Dr. J. T. Lloyd, I wish to express my gratitude for the valuable 
assistance rendered. 

+ In gross dissection, hot water killing and Gilson’s fixing solution were found 
to be most advantageous. 


256 


1922] Branch: Internal Anatomy of Trichoptera Zot 


and fuses with the nerve which extends posteriorly from the ganglion 
situated at union of the nerves from the posterior protuberances of the 
supra-cesophageal ganglia and the sympathetic ganglia of each side. 

From the ventral face of the supra-cesophageal ganglia, arises a 
pair of connectives, the crura cerebri, which connect the supra-cesoph- 
ageal ganglia with the sub-cesophageal ganglion. 

Immediately in front of the union of the crura cerebri with the 
supra-cesophageal ganglia, the oesophageal ring of the tritocerebrum 
arises. This is a loop which encircles the cesophagus and has its ends 
connected with the supra-cesophageal ganglia, see Plate XIV, Fig. 5 at or. 
The supra-cesophageal ganglia does not fit closely upon the cesophagus 
normally, but leaves some space laterally and ventrally for the expan- 
sion of the tube in feeding. Faivre 1857, states that the supra-cesoph- 
ageal ganglia possess the seat of motive power and will power and Binet, 
189+, strengthens this statement by the results of his own experiments 
which show that an insect will live for months with the supra- 
cesophageal ganglia removed but will not eat unless the food is placed 
in its mouth as it has no power to move toward the food. 


The sub-cesophageal ganglion is situated slightly back of the 
posterior margin of the supra-cesophageal and below the cesophagus 
but well within the limits of the head cavity. This ganglion gives off 
three pairs of nerves, the most ectal and dorsal of which extends in a 
forward and upward direction and, upon a level with and in front of the 
frontal ganglion, branches. One branch extends to the base of the 
labrum, see Plate XIV, Figs. 5 and 6 at Ib2, while a second branch 
extends to the dorsal side of the mandible, see Plate XIV, Figs. 5 and 6 
at md2. The second pair of nerves from the sub-cesophageal ganglion 
arises ventrad of the first pair and extends forward also branching. 
The ectal branch of each nerve reaches the musculature of the maxilla, 
mx1; and an ental branch divides and one part goes to the maxillary 
sclerite and the other to the labium, see Plate XIV, Figs. 5 and 6, at mx2 
and li2. This pair is connected by a nerve just below the frontal ganglion, 
and the cross nerve bears a small median ganglion. The third pair of 
nerves is ventrad of the second pair and extends forward directly to the 
labium, which it innervates, lil. 


The above description is made from several dozen specimens of the 
species Limnophilus indivisus Walker. The head ganglia of the other 
species studied do not vary materially. 

Posteriorly the sub-cesophageal ganglion gives off a pair of com- 
missures which connect to the first thoracic* ganglion lying in the 
prothorax. In the thorax and abdomen there is much variation among 
the species as to the relation of the ganglia to their respective seg- 
ments. Upon observation of these three species (Limnophilus indivisus 
Walker, Hydropsychodes analis Banks and Phryganea interrupta Say,) 
two centers of fusion will be found, one in the thorax and one in the 
abdomen at the posterior end of the chain. As above stated, there are 
three thoracic and eight abdominal ganglia. The prothoracic and 


* Each ganglion of the thorax and abdomen is a pair of fused ganglia. 


bo 
On 


Annals Entomological Society of America  |Vol. XV, 


mesothoracic ganglia are about the same size as the sub-cesophageal 
ganglion and are each situated equidistantly from the anterior and 
posterior margins of the segments and this condition prevails for the 
three species. The metathoracic ganglion is larger than those of the 
preceding segments and its position is not the same in the different 
species for it is here that the thoracic fusion point occurs. In Phryganea 
interrupta the ganglion is centrally located with the ganglion of the 
first abdominal segment just Ww ithin the posterior border of the meta- 
thorax. In Limnophilus indivisus, the metathoracic ganglion has 
migrated forward and the first abdominal ganglion has followed until 
the latter occupies the central position with the metathoracic ganglion 
well in the front half of the segment. In Hydropsychodes analis, the 
condition is the same as in L. indivisus. 


In the abdomen of the three species the positions of the ganglia 
are more noticeably variable. In P. interrupta the first abdominal 
segment bears at its posterior margin, the ganglion of segment two 
and segment two is void of any ganglion, but receiving its innervation 
from its respective ganglion located in segment one. The ganglia of 
segments three, four, five and six occur in their respective segments 
near the front margins. Segment seven bears in its front half, two 
ganglia; these are the gangla for segments seven and eight and they 
are very closely united, but not fused at all, Plate XIV, Big. 26rd 
L. indivisus, the ganglion of segment two occupies a central position 
in segment one, indicating a forward migration. Segments three. four 
and five have their ganglia in the front half of the segment as in P. 
interrupta. In segment six all the ganglia of the three segments, six, 
seven and eight, are placed; those relating to segments seven and eight 
are closely united, practically fused, and take a position 1n the posterior 
half of the segment. The ganglion for segment six is in the anterior 
half of the segment, Plate XIV, Fig. 1. In H. analis we find an arrange- 
ment in the abdomen which varies from that which Pictet, 1834, 
observed in Hydropsyche, for he saw all the ganglia here upon the 
divisions between the segments. In this particular species, the ganglion 
for segment two is in segment one as usual, and the ganglion for segment 
three is on the margin between segments two and three which is a 
forward migration. The ganglion for segment four is in front of the 
center of the segment and the ganglion for segment five is back of the 
center of its respective segment. In the sixth abdominal segment 
are three ganglia. for segments six, seven and eight respectively and all 
are in a line and practically fused, Plate XIV, Fig. 3. 

The thoracic ganglia and the abdominal from one to six innervate 
their respective segments and appendages, the seventh abdominal 
appears to have only one pair of nerves which extend backward into 
segment seven, the eighth abdominal ganglion innervates segment 
eight and nine, as well as the swimmerets, which extend out from seg- 
ment nine. There are various ways for the eighth abdominal segment 
to innervate segment nine. In P. interrupta and H. analis it sends a 
nerve directly to the segment, but in L. indivisus the nerve which 
extends to segment eight branches and sends a branch to segment 


1922] Branch: Internal Anatomy of Trichoptera 259 


nine, this arrangement leaves one less pair of nerves arising from ganglion 
eight in L. indivisus than in P. interrupta or H. analis. 

Upon a comparison of the three Figures, Nos. 1, 2 and 3, Plate XIV, 
a sequence of fusion is evident. This sequence places P. interrupta 
as the most generalized and H. analis as the most specialized and L. 
indivisus as intermediate. Vorhies, 1905, has described the nervous 
system of Platyphylax designatus Walker and it falls between P. 
interrupta and L. indivisus for the ganglia of the seventh and eighth 
segments have migrated so that the ganglion for segment seven is just 
inside the posterior margin of segment six and the ganglion for segment 
eight remains in segment seven, but very close to its anterior margin. 
Betten, 1901, in his description of Molanna cinerea does not show it 
to vary from P. designatus. Pictet, 1834, figures Phryganea striata 
Fab. to fall between P. designatus and L. indivisus with the ganglia 
for segments six, seven and eight in segment six, but ganglia seven 
and eight not fused. Klapalek, 1888, does not note any variation of 
position, but merely gives the number of ganglia and their general 
distribution. 

From the above it seems reasonable to think that the nervous system 
of the order will reveal grades of consolidation of the ganglia which may 
have a decided bearing upon classification. 


REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEM. 


The writer has done very little in this system beyond the mere 
location of the organs, for the matter seems to have been given adequate 
attention by Zander, 1901, Lubben, 1907, and Marshall, 1907. As 
to the period of the appearance of the organs there is a difference of 
opinion. Pictet, 1834, Klapalek, 1888, and Vorhies, 1905, make the 
statement that the organs do not appear until near the period of pupa- 
tion or at least in a very old larva; Lubben, 1907, discusses conditions 
in a transforming larva, while Marshall, 1907, speaks of the condition 
of the organs in the youngest larva he had, but does not give the stage. 
In all the specimens observed by the writer, the gonads appear in 
the early forms, showing clearly both in gross dissection and sections. 
In P. interrupta taken in October and H. analis taken in late December 
from under the ice in streams, the gonads are distinct and developed 
far enough so that tubules may be seen, Plate XIV, Fig. 7. This period 
is long before there are any signs of pupation either in case or larva. 

Within the species two shapes of gonads appear. In P. interrupta 
some are elongate and flat, while others are spherical. This seems to 
point to a sex differentiation, the elongate one probably destined to 
become female organs and the spherical ones male organs, Plate XIV, 
Fig. 2. In gross dissection in L. indivisus only one kind of a gonad 
was observed, this circular and plate-like of five pairs of tubules. Plate 
XIV, Fig. 1, at gd. In each gonad there are two outgrowths or attach- 
ments: one from the outer side and extending to the ventral body wall 
of the second abdominal segment and resembling a supporting thread 
or tissue, the inner side outgrowth appears as a duct and the tubules 
of the gonad may be seen converging toward the head of this duct. 


260 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


The duct extends in a posterior direction and extends to the ventral 
side of the eighth segment, where it is lost. Lubben, 1907, shows that 
these ducts pass into external, sculptured plates in the eighth segment 
but I have been unable to find any such structure or any opening what- 
ever at this point on any of the specimens. In Z. analis the gonad 
is oval, but appears spherical in frontal section as the long axis of the 
gonad is at right angles to that of the body of the larva. The gonads 
of the above three species are in pairs and lie in the fifth segment of the 
abdomen Betten, 1901 finds the gonads for M. cinerea in segment 
four; Lubben, 1907, records Anabolia nervosa and Limnophilus stigma 
as having the organs in segment five, Rhyacophila septentrionis and 
Brachycentrus montanus 1n segment four. Klapalek, 1888, gives the 
gonads a general location of segment three, but neither literature nor 
my own observations uphold this statement. From a compilation 
of records the position appears to be in either the fourth or fifth 
segment. 


ALIMENTARY CANAL. 


General description: The alimentary canal, in the order Trichoptera, 
passes as almost a straight tube from buccal cavity to anus. Pictet, 
18354, figures the tube as practically undifferentiated in its shape and 
only varying slightly in size at the extreme ends. Klapalek, 1888, 
states that the regions merge imperceptibly into each other. Although 
this concition may be true in a specimen gorged with food, the writer 
has never seen a specimen where the three main divisions of stomodeum, 
mesenteron and proctodeum were not distinctly marked one from the 
other. The lack of convolutions as are normal in the alimentary canals 
of insects which are herbivorous, is unusual, as Siltala, 1907, shows that 
the order is in the main herbivorous and yet this general type of a 
straight tube prevails. There are a few semi-carnivorous species, but 
even here there is no variation from the above condition. The assimi- 
lative area is increased by an unusual width in proportion to that of 
the body, for in many places and especially the mesenteron, the width 
is equal to one-third and frequently more than one-third the width of 
the abdomen. Another device adds to this area or surface for the wall 
of the mesenteron is folded into transverse ridges which increase the 
surface by three times that actually occupied by the wal!, Plate XV, 
Fig. 10. These folds are deeper in the strictly herbivorous types, such 
as L. indivisus, than in those which are more or less carnivorous, as 
H. analis. We will pass now to a discussion of the alimentary canal 
in the three species. Hydropsychodes analis Banks, Plate XV, Figs. 
7, 8 and 9. The surface of the stomodeum of the alimentary canal 
presents a silvery appearance, due to the peritoneal covering of the 
muscles which surround and control the activities of this portion of the 
canal. This portion is much darker than the remainder of the canal, 
due to the food within. If this be cleaned, the wall appears transparent. 
Beneath the peritoneal membrane can be seen the longitudinal muscles 
arranged in pairs in six equi-distant places around the canal. Under- 
neath these longitudinal muscles lie the circular muscles, which are so 


1922] Branch: Internal Anatomy of Trichoptera 261 


heavy and thick that they give the canal the appearance of having 
great rings around it. The stomodeum is composed of four parts, 
namely: buccal cavity, cesophagus, crop and proventriculus. The buccal 
cavity is large, including half the depth of the head capsule, it narrows 
rapidly and passes over into a slender tube which passes beneath the 
supra-cesophageal ganglia as the cesophagus. The cesophagus extends 
backward through the head and prothorax with only slight expansion. 
At the posterior margin of the prothorax it begins to enlarge and extends 
through the length of the mesothorax with a diameter one-third that 
of the thorax and four times the diameter of the oesophagus in the 
prothorax. This is the crop. At the posterior margin of the meso- 
thorax the stomodeum is suddenly constricted to about half its width 
and within a longitudinal distance of .5 mm. suddenly enlarges to form 
a cylindrical structure, the wall of which becomes resistant to dissecting 
instruments and is very hard. The circular muscles are larger and 
heavier in this region and inside the tube are chitinized teeth. This 
portion is the proventriculus, which functions as a grinding organ 
and possibly as a straining device. 


The cylindrical shape ends suddenly at the posterior margin of the 
metathorax and the transition into the mesenteron is well indicated by 
change in color, texture and structure of the wall and by a deep fold. 
The proventriculus pushes into the forward end of the mesenteron and 
forms there an oesophageal valve. The mesenteron folds up over the 
proventriculus and causes a distinct line to appear between the two 
portions. The silvery tone of the wall is lost at this juncture; the 
longitudinal muscles break up to form a layer of muscles around the 
mesenteron and this layer extends the full length of the mesenteron. 
Beneath these muscles can be seen the very thin layer of circular muscles. 
The mesenteron enlarges at its beginning to at least a third the diameter 
of the abdomen of the larva and increases slightly toward the fourth 
segment and then returns to its width at the beginning before it reaches 
its length. This division arises at the posterior end of the metathorax 
and extends through the length of the abdomen as an almost straight 
tube, varying only as above in diameter, circular in cross section, and 
possessed of an extremely thick wall, but one that is easily torn apart. 
In the sixth segment the mesenteron becomes about two-thirds the 
diameter at its beginning and passes over into the proctodeum. The 
proctodeum is composed of intestine, both large and small, and the 
rectum. The mesenteron pushes into the intestine in much the same 
manner that the proventriculus pushes into the mesenteron, but the 
distance is not as great and the valve formed is not a distinct one in this 
species, although the division between the two main divisions of the 
canal is clearly marked. At the point where these two portions meet, 
the Malpighian tubules, of which there are six, make their appearance 
upon the surface. These tubules are situated upon the lateral and 
ventral faces of the alimentary canal and the dorsal face is void of them; 
however, the first pair may be easily seen from a dorsal view, each mem- 
ber of this pair lies upon the upper portion of the lateral face and 
extends forward through the abdomen and into the metathorax. Slightly 


262 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


below the first pair, the second pair arises and extends, each member 
of the pair upon its respective side of the alimentary canal, forward 
for the remaining distance of the sixth segment where it turns back- 
ward and taking an upward and lateral direction, with regard to the 
intestine, curves and coils about in the lower part of the abdomen back 
of the sixth segment. The third pair of tubules is situated upon the 
venter about equidistant from each other and from the corresponding 
members of the second pair. This third pair extends backward 
immediately and each member comes to lie beneath and to the side of 
the intestine, intertwining with the corresponding member of the 
second pair. The tubules are irregular in outline, appearing like small 
oval beads strung upon a thread. In general color they are a pale, 
clear yellow, but blotched at irregular intervals with a kidney-brown 
pigment. They weave in and out among the fat bodies and tracehe, 
and into blood sinuses to perform their function of the removal of 
nitrogenous waste. 


The front end of the intestine is cup-shaped with the larger end 
forward. This portion represents the small intestine. The tube 
grows smaller as it proceeds toward the caudal end. but in the seventh 
segment is greatly constricted; it enlarges immediately and passes 
through segment eight with a diameter of about a fourth that of the 
segment and two-fifths of the diameter of the mesenteron in the first 
segment. This portion represents the large intestine. 


At the posterior margin of segment eight, the intestine is again 
constricted and passes over into the rectum. At this juncture there is a 
semi-valve formed by the invaginated walls of the intestine. These 
folds become longer and fewer in number and form the blood gills which 
lie in the rectum. The rectum extends through the ninth segment. 
In some forms examined, the small diameter of the constricted region 
at the posterior end of segment seven prevails through the eighth, 
widening suddenly at the beginning of the ninth to accommodate the 
invaginations forming the blood gills; in other forms the widening is 
gradual through the eighth and passes over gradually into the rectum 
without any noticeable constriction. The wall of the small intestine 
is heavy and surrounded with circular muscles. It becomes thinner as it 
extends toward the large intestine. When the rectum is reached the 
wall is exceedingly thin and almost transparent. Through the wall 
can be seen the four pockets or invaginations which form the blood gills, 
and into these muscles extend from the lateral and ventral walls at the 
conjunctiva between segments.eight and nine. The rectum now serves 
a double function, that of elimination of fecal matter and secondarily 
that of respiration, when oxygen cannot be obtained by means of the 
tracheal gills. These blood gills have no tracheze running into them 
as a glycerine mount of the caudal portion of a fresh specimen clearly 
demonstrates. They function, when the larva is out of the water, by 
protruding themselves through the T-shaped anus, in which state they 
are filled with blood. A detailed account of their structure will be 
found elsewhere in this paper. 


1922] Branch: Internal Anatomy of Trichoptera 263 


Limnophilus indivisus Walker,* Plate XV, Figs. 1, 2, 3 and 5. 
In this form the oesophagus passes from the buccal cavity into the head 
region where it is a small tube and continues through the prothorax. 
The crop is absent in this form and the cesophagus passes immediately 
into the proventriculus. Here the chitinized ‘‘teeth”’ upon the lining 
such as we find in H. analis are lacking. They are not needed, as the 
form is strictly herbivorous and H. analis is semi-carnivorous. The 
oesophagus begins to enlarge at the posterior edge of the prothorax to 
form the proventriculus, which lies in the mesathorax: It is silvery in 
appearance and dark colored, but not resistant to the needle owing 
to the lack of chitinized teeth within. The proventriculus possesses 
the six pairs of longitudinal muscles and the circular layer, but these 
are not as heavy as in H. analis: At the posterior margin of the 
mesothorax the proventriculus constricts slightly and passes over into 
the mesenteron. This position is contrary to the usual division level 
for these two portions of the alimentary canal, but the cesophageal 
valve occurs here and ‘the character of the wall changes to a light pale 
color, is thicker in cell depth and the six pairs of muscles from the 
proventriculus form the characteristic layer around the new division. 
From these characteristic markings there can be no doubt as to this 
transition. The cesophageal valve is normal, Plate XV, Figs. 2 and 3 
show it as a complete invagination of the wall, in a fold of eight pro- 
jections 

The mesenteron takes its beginning in the mesothorax and increases 
in diameter as it passes through the metathorax. It may be slightly 
constricted in the first abdominal segment although it frequently 
passes without any change of contour. It passes through the abdomen 
at its diameter of one-third that of the abdomen and extends to the 
sixth segment. Here the transition into the intestine occurs and the 
juncture is marked by the presence of the six Malpighian tubules, 
in the same arrangement asin H. analis. The tubes are longer, however, 
and the first pair does not extend into the thorax, but turns backward 
in the first abdominal segment and returns to the seventh. The 
second pair frequently extends as far as segment three and then returns 
to segment eight. The third pair may continue forward through 
segment six before turning backward. The junction between mesenteron 
and intestine is marked by a decided valve not found in H. analis 
and similar to the cesophageal valve. A section showing this structure 
is on Plate XV, Fig. 10. The intestine at its forward end is also cup- 
shaped and, at the constriction between small and large intestine, 
possesses a valve formed by the invagination of the intestinal wall. 
(Plate XV, Fig. 5). Along the intestine are six muscle bundles which 
seem to control the initial position of the Malpighian tubules. Marchal, 
1892, considers the tubules as being capable of motion and perhaps 
these muscles have some part in that action.. These muscles likewise 
support the front edge of the rectum into which the large intestine 
telescopes. 


* This species is selected for a comparison with H. analis, as the two rep- 
resent widely divergent forms. 


264 Annals Entomological Society of America  [Vol. ay; 


Phryganea interrupta Say* Plate XV, Fig. 11. 


In P. interrupta, the cesophagus passes through the head as a 
narrow tube and enlarges toward the posterior margin of the prothorax 
to form a crop of small dimension which is marked from the proven- 
triculus by a slight constriction. The proventriculus occupies the 
meso and metathorax in length and practically fills the whole of the 
body cavity in this region, it presents the silvery surface as in the 
other forms and the longitudinal and circular muscles are evident. The 
posterior end of the proventriculus extends over into the first abdominal 
segment and here is constricted suddenly and passes through this seg- 
ment as a small tube about one-fourth the diameter of the proventriculus 
in the mesothorax. This constriction is so long that the longitudinal 
muscles of the proventriculus do not follow the tube but span the dis- 
tance from the beginning of the constriction to the surface of the 
mesenteron and can be seen as threads across the open space. 

The mesenteron is the same as in the other forms and passes over 
into the intestine of the proctodeum in the sixth segment where the 
Malpighian tubules arise. These do not always assume the same posi- 
tions, which is further evidence of Marchal’s theory on their mobility. 
Marchal, 1892. The intestine extends through segments six and seven 
and at the anterior margin of the eighth there is a constriction as the 
intestine passes over into the rectum. The rectum gradually grows 
smaller as it nears the anus. The anterior portion of the intestine has a 
heavy musculature and the lower part is ridged longitudinally and these 
ridges become more prominent in the rectum and form four longitudinal 
columns which continue to the anus. 


HISTOLOGY OF THE ALIMENTARY CANAL.{ 


In this work the writer has divided the material into two parts: 
that dealing with cellular structure and that relating to the musculature 
of the canal. The condition in H. analis is taken as a basis of compar- 
ison and where L. indivisus differs from the above the condition is noted 
and illustrated in the figures. 

Buccal cavity: The cells are flat and small with small nuclei. The 
cavity is heavily lined with chitin. 


* This third species is selected on account of its larger size. 


t A normal cesophageal valve occurs at the division between proventriculus 
and mesenteron. 


{ In the histological work, both hot Gilson’s and hot Bouin’s were used with 
equal advantage if the material was to be used at once. If more than a month 
were to elapse before the material would be used, Bouin’s was by far the better 
fixative, as those in Gilson’s softened rapidly. 

Much better results were attained by clearing in xylol than in cedar oil. 
An infiltration of not longer than nine hours, including the time in xylol and 
paraffin, equal parts, at 52 degrees F., produced the material most easily cut. 

Staining in Delafield’s haemotoxylin and counterstaining in aqueous 14% 
eosin produced excellent results as a general stain. For muscles and epithelial 
cells, iron haemotoxylin made clearer slides than the above. Paracarmine with 
a counter stain of orange G. was especially adapted to digestive epithelial tissue in 
L. indivisus. 


1922] Branch: Internal Anatomy of Trichoptera 265 


Oesophagus: The cells of the epithelium are cubical and the whole 
epithelium is lined with a chitinous intima. The basement membrane 
is distinct between the epithelium and the muscles surrounding the 
oesophagus. 

Crop: Conditions the same as in the cesophagus. 

Proventriculus: The cells of the epithelium do not vary from those 
of the cesophagus but the wall itself is thrown into folds and the intima 
becomes thick and dense and forms the stomachic teeth, the number of 
which is about thirty-six. A cross section of this region shows them 
surrounding the cavity. At the posterior margin of the proventriculus 
is the cesophageal valve which in this form is of peculiar plan. It is 
practically double with a strongly chitinized invagination into the pro- 
ventriculus and an extremely deep but narrow invagination into the 
mesenteron. This valve does not completely surround the constriction 
between the two divisions. For further details see Noyes 1915. This 
valve in L. indivisus is normal and complete. It extends into the mesen- 
teron in a fold, the upper part of which is composed of cubical cells with 
an extremely heavy intima, while the under portion of the fold although 
the cells are cubical become somewhat flattened and the intima reduced 
to a thin membrane. The wall changes suddenly into the columnar 
structure of the mesenteron with its striated border. At the point 
where the intima ceases the peritrophic membrane arises. This. is sep- 
arated from the epithelial wall of the mesenteron and surrounds the 
food in the canal, Plate XV, Fig. 6. 

Mesenteron: The epithelium here is similar to that at the posterior 
end of the cesophageal valve except that the cells become more col- 
umnar. The conditions in function accord with those described in the 
dragonfly nymph, Needham, 1907, and need no further discussion 
here. The wall of the mesenteron is folded as mentioned in the dis- 
cussion of the gross anatomy of the canal to produce more assimilative 
surface and this condition prevails the entire length of the mesenteron 
to the sixth segment. In this same segment the Malpighian tubules 
show upon the surface and the mesenteron passes over into the intestine, 
Plate XV, Fig. 10 at dep. 


Malpighian tubules: At the posterior end of the mesenteron where 
the cells are still columnar, the ventral pair of Malpighian tubules may 
be seen breaking through the epithelial wall on their way to the surface, 
Plate XVI, Fig. 7. Patten, 1884, in his embryological investigation of 
the Trichoptera shows that these tubules are evaginations of the proc- 
todeum before the wall of the forming mesenteron is joined with that 
of the proctodeum. Further evidence of this is seen in sections of the 
intestine further back where the tubules may be seen forming within 
the epithelial tissue of the intestinal walls. The cells are still columnar 
but the presence of intima and the loss of the striated border indicate 
that this is no longer mesenteron, Plate XVI, Fig. 6. The Malpighian 
tubules are composed of large cells, glandular in appearance, with a 
large nucleus in the center of the cell. The pigment so noticeable in 
gross structure now becomes more evident and stains darker than the 
nucleus and is not confined to a given region of the cell. There are three 


266 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


distinct layers; upon the inside is the lining or the intima, then the 
large celled wall and the covering which is muscular, Plate XVIII, 
Figs. 7 and 8. The dorso-lateral and lateral tubules reach the surface 
posterior to the ventral pair. 

Intestine: The transition to intestine in H. analis is accomplished 
with a mere constriction and change in cellular structure, but in L. 
indivisus there is a valve formed as the oesophageal valve is formed, but 
reversed in its components, the upper part of the fold is slightly columnar 
in its cellular structure but covered with intima in a thin coat, the intima 
becomes thicker and the cells cubical as the folds turn toward the 
intestinal wall, Plate XV, Fig. 10. At the posterior edge of segment 
seven the cubical wall changes and becomes large celled with large 
nuclei, Plate XVI, Fig. 2. In H. analis this continues to the anterior 
margin of the ninth segment, Plate XVI, Fig. A at 2. At the beginning 
of the ninth segment the epithelial wall changes to a cubical condition 
which changes only as the wall becomes differentiated into the blood 
gills and returns to the cubical condition when this function ceases. 
The whole length of the intestine is thrown into six longitudinal folds 
which begin in the sixth segment, Plate XVI, Fig. 6, and is traceable 
through all the sections to the rectum where the semi-valve occurs 
and the four blood gills arise. The folds do not continue into the rectum. 
In L. indivisus transition in the eighth segment from the cubical celled 
condition to the large celled, which marks the end of the intestine in 
this form, is a distinct rectal valve not different in character or forma- 
tion from the one into the intestine from the mesenteron; the cells of 
the wall of the rectum are large with large nuclei and this condition 
continues to within .5 mm. of the anus. It is possible to consider the 
rectum of H. analis as beginning at this level and the semi-valve as only 
the transition into the blood gills, but the gross anatomical structure 
seems to bear the former interpretation. 

Musculature: The cesophagus is surrounded with bundles of longi- 
tudinal muscles, outside of which is a layer of banded circular muscles 
and outside of these six pairs of longitudinal muscles so noticeable in 
gross structure. At the anterior end of the proventriculus the inside 
layer of longitudinal muscles cease and the proventriculus is imme- 
diately surrounded by circular muscles, (see Noyes 1915), which con- 
tinue as a sheath of varying thickness for the full length of the alimen- 
tary canal as far as the rectum. 

Mesenteron: The six pairs of longitudinal muscles break up into a 
layer of longitudinal muscles, this layer is composed of large bundles 
upon the outside and small ones upon the inside next to the thin cir- 
cular muscles. See Plate XVI, Fig. 7. 

Intestine: At the anterior end of this division where the cells of 
the epithelium are columnar but covered with intima, a heavy circular 
muscle arises pushing some of the longitudinal muscles outside and 
enclosing the smaller ones, Plate XVI, Fig. 6. In a very few sections 
of .0OOS mm. in thickness this muscular wall is complete, Plate XVI, 
Fig. 5. The inner layer of circular muscles becomes thicker as we 
advance toward the posterior end of the canal and the inner longitudinal 


1922| Branch: Internal Anatomy of Trichoptera 267 


muscles have formed themselves into the characteristic six pairs and 
those pushed to the outside of the outer circular muscles have ceased, 
Plate XVI, Fig. 4. This heavy outer circular muscle comes to an end 
in the seventh segment, leaving the six longitudinal pairs as the exterior 
layer, Plate XVI, Fig. 3. This condition prevails throughout segment 
eight, Plate XVI, Fig. 2, and past the semi-valve into the gill chamber 
of the rectum, Plate XVI, Fig. 1. For a diagram of this musculature, 
see Plate XVI, Fig. A, the levels drawn are numbered as the figures 
which are taken in cross section at these same levels. The musculature 
of L. indivisus does not vary from this description based upon H. 
analis, with the exception that in the mesenteron the longitudinal 
muscles are of a single layer, Plate XVI, Fig. 8. The blood gills of 
H. analis rightfully belong to the discussion of the histology of the 
alimentary canal, but their structure is sufficient to claim for them a 
separate division of this paper. 


Blood Gills of Hydropsychodes analis Banks. 


Protruding from the T-shaped anus, Plate XV, Figs. 8 and 9, 
Plate XVII, Fig. 1, are often seen four transparent, greenish, finger-like 
appendages, Plate XIV, Fig. 3. These are protruded beyond the 
limits of the anus when the larva is out of the water crawling upon 
the rocks, or may be artificially protruded by pressure upon the abdomen 
in the caudal region. Pictet, 1834, states that these appendages contain 
tracheze. There are muscles leading into the gills which might be 
mistaken for trachez if the microscope were not of high magnification. 
Dufour, 1847, figures these gills as appendages from the recttim into the 
body cavity, but without tracheze. This error of Dufour is easily under- 
stood when the larva is dissected, for it is almost, if not quite, impossible 
to open a larva from the dorsal side and not cut into the rectum so 
that these gills float out as though appendages from it. It is only 
when a lateral opening is made that the true internal position is observed. 
Fritz Muller, 1888, does not show any trachee in the gills and Thienman, 
1903, and Lubben, 1907, represent these as non-trachee bearing 
structures. In the glycerine mounts of the caudal end of the abdomen 
with the gills protruding from the anus, the tracheal tubes are seen to 
pass down the sides of the body sending branches to the alimentary 
canal and surrounding tissues. Long branches or continuations of the 
main tracheal trunks extend into the anal pro-legs or drag hooks, 
but in no instance does a single tracheole extend to a gill. In neither 
the transverse sections or the longitudinal ones does tracheal structure 
appear. Muscles and blood make up the content of the gill. These 
gills are in direct communication with the body cavity and it is possible 
that, when occasion renders the supply of oxygen insufficient, the blood 
rushes from the blood sinuses into these ‘‘pockets’’ and comes with 
sufficient force and quantity to extend the gill and push it to the exterior 
and an exchange of gases takes place through the wall of the gill. This 
action, combined with the lack of trachez, seems sufficient evidence 
upon which to claim the term of true blood gills for these structures. 


268 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


When retracted these gills lie within the rectum, which serves a 
double function, with their distal ends or tips close to the anus and just 
barely within the aperture. They may function slightly at this 
time. 

In surface view the gills present a cylindrical form which tapers as it 
extends distally. Upon the surface are transverse ridges which are 
bounded by thread-like depressions. These depressions are as deep as 
the ridges are wide, for these ridges are made up of rings of cells one 
cell deep and one cell wide. At rest these cells are cubical, being as 
deep as they are wide, and the depressions are the expansion spaces 
between the cells. In expansion this ring of cells becomes narrower 
in diameter and the cells themselves wider and more shallow. Compare 
Plate XVII, Fig. 6, where the gill is at rest, and Fig. 7, where it is in 
extended condition. The tips of the gills are more dense and of a darker 
color than the rest of the gill. This condition is due, no doubt, to their 
close proximity to the anal aperture and to the fact that they must. at 
times push their way through waste material in their extension. 

To get a clear conception of the formation of these gills, it is necessary 
to start with their origin in the wall of the intestine in the ninth segment. 
Here the glandular large celled condition of the intestinal wall ceases 
and becomes cubical. The wall is thin and the six longitudinal folds 
extend inward so as to form a semi-valve at the head of the rectum, 
Plate XVII, Fig. 4. Gradually these folds merge into four and form the 
four gills. Plate XVII, Fig. 5, shows these longitudinal folds merging 
into the gills and being continuous with them. After the formation 
of the gill. the rectal wall does not again fold, but passes directly to 
the anus. 

At rest the width of the gill is about one-third its length, which 
normally is slightly less than the width of the ninth segment. The gill 
is capable of extension to about three times its normal length, and at 
this time the wall becomes thin and the cells much longer than deep. 
Not all of this extension length is made by the gill itself, as the folds at 
the head of the rectum extend and the caudal wall of the rectum itself 
is carried down with the gills, Plate XVII, Fig. 7. 

The deep cells of the walls of the gills are possessed of large nuclei 
and are glandular in appearance. These cells take up about four- 
fifths of the diameter of the gill when at rest, leaving the other fifth 
for the muscle which extends from the conjunctiva of the lateral and 
ventral walls between segments eight and nine. Each gill possesses a 
muscle which arises at a corresponding place upon the conjunctiva 
and extends to the tip of the gill. Each gill muscle is three branched, 
Plate XVII, Fig. 8, and when at rest lines the gill) The gills are covered 
with a very thin intima, which is continuous with that of the rectum 
and intestine. 


GLANDS. 


Not all the glands in the body of the trichopterous larve are con- 
sidered here. The writer has confined her attention to the silk glands, 
the thoracic glands and the glands in the head, in this last only those in 
L. indivisus have been studied. 


1922] Branch: Internal Anatomy of Trichoptera 269 


The Silk Glands: Of all the glands of the trichopterous larvee 
these are the most prominent. They practically fill the part of the 
body cavity not occupied by the alimentary canal and extend from the 
labial spinneret into the seventh segment. They are opaquely white, 
having a pinkish cast in a fresh specimen. Their content is sticky and 
if the glands of a fresh specimen be broken in dissection the secretion 
will so glue the organs and tissues together as to make further dissection 
impossible. This difficulty is remedied by applying Gilson’s preserva- 
tive to the freshly opened specimen and allowing it to remain for fifteen 
or twenty minutes. 

Upon the floor and in the center of the anterior edge of the labium 
is a spinneret, Plate XVIII, Fig. 3, at sp. This is connected to a single 
tube of .2 mm. in length. In this region is the silk press composed of 
muscles which control the flow of secretion. This structure does not 
differ from the structure of the forms studied by Gilson, 1894, and needs 
no further discussion in this paper. At the posterior margin of the 
labium this single, slender tube becomes divided into two and passes 
ventrad of the nerves extending from the sub-cesophageal ganglion to 
the mouth parts. On reaching the ganglion each member of the pair 
of tubes passes laterad of the ganglion, Plate XVIII, Fig. 4, and then 
approaches its mate and passes with it underneath the cesophagus. At 
the posterior margin of the sub-cesophageal ganglion the tubes change 
their character from that of a duct to a true gland. In the duct the 
cells are small with simple nuclei. Externally the change is marked 
with a depression as though a thread were fastened tightly around the 
tube. Back of this depression is the gland proper, composed of an 
outer wall with an irregularly shaped nucleus in a flattened cell. This 
outer wall is two cells. in circumference, the cells are hexagonal with 
the lateral face in a triangle. The front face of the triangle meets 
the posterior face of the triangular side of the other cell, see Plate 
XVIII, Fig. 5. Inside of this wall, which is frequently very loosely 
applied, is the inner tube consisting of a firm cylindrical wall, where 
the secretion is formed and inside of this heavy wall is a narrow tube 
through which the secretion passes to the duct, Plate XVIII, Figs. 
6 and 6a. 

These silk glands lie ventrad of the alimentary canal throughout the 
thorax and frequently as far as the second abdominal segment. Finally 
they make their appearance at the sides of the alimentary canal and 
increase in size. They extend to the sixth segment where they turn 
forward again and extend to the second and third abdominal segment, 
turning backward they reach to the seventh segment where the distal 
ends are frequently folded under the intestine or float free among the 
various folds of the Malpighian tubules, Plate XV, Fig. 1. For a 
detailed description of these glands see Vorhies, 1908. 

Thoracic glands: Gilson, 1896, shows Phryganea grandis as possess- 
ing three glands or pairs of glands in the thorax, one pair to each of the 
segments. These glands are formed of small tubes which come together 
to form a small reservoir from which a single tube extends. This tube 
meets its fellow and together as one tube they open to the exterior in a 
small pore. Henseval, 1895-6, did not find the three pairs in all of the 


270 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


forms studied but found a compound gland in the prothorax. This is 
the condition of L. indivisus and P. interrupta, although the structure 
of the two glands is not the same. In P. interrupta it resembles the glands 
found by Gilson in P. grandis and is much branched, Plate XVIII, 
Fig. 9, and Plate XIV, Fig. 2, ggl. The gland in L. indivisus is single 
and lies above the prothoracic ganglion, its opening is between the 
connectives of this ganglion to the sub-cesophageal and connects with a 
spinneret which lies at the extreme anterior margin of the prothorax 
and extends forward under the head, Plate XV, Fig. 1, at ggl, Plate 
XVIII, Fig. 1, ggl, and Fig. 10. In H. analis a gland, corresponding 
to this gland of Gilson, has not been found. 


Glands in the Head of Limnophilus indivisus Walker. 


In the head are six pairs of glands exclusive of the silk- glands. 
Lucas, 18938, Henseval, 1895, and Russ, 1907, mention two pairs and 
term them mandibular and maxillary glands. L. indivisus possesses 
these two pairs and others. The mandibular gland is situated on the 
outer angle of the mandibular sclerite and is composed of a number of 
single celled glands or “pockets”? which open into a common duct. 
This common duct leads to the base of the sclerite, the name of which 
it bears, Plate XVIII, Fig. 14. The maxillary gland, as Lucas so terms 
the second of the head glands, is similar to the mandibular but is com- 
posed of many more of the small single celled glands. The two glands 
lie underneath the cesophagus with their several small lobes folded 
upon each other and their ducts extending almost at right angles from 
each other. These ducts open into the buccal cavity at the inner margin 
of the mandibular sclerite, Plate XVIII, Fig. 13. Patten, 1884, states 
that they are an invagination of the inner margin of the mandibular 
sclerite in the embryo and Patten terms them salivary glands. Further 
ventrad in the lead lies a multicellular gland in the maxillary sclerite 
with an opening into the distal end of this sclerite, Plate XVII, Fig. 12. 
In the labium we find a pair of similar glands, Plate XVIII, Fig. 11. With 
these glands hitherto undescribed, and which we must, from their position 
at least, term maxillary and labial glands, the so-called maxillary glands 
of Lucas present a problem for nomenclature. Lucas ventures the 
theory that the glands of the head are coxal glands and the homologs of 
the parapodal glands of the annelid. If this theory be accepted then 
the maxillary sclerites may not be possessed of two pairs of glands nor 
may the mandibular sclerites. The writer prefers to use Patten’s name 
of salivary gland, for the maxillary gland of Lucas. 

Glands also exist at the base of the antennez and below the visual 
area, but these are not figured. 

Circulatory system of L. indivisus: This is simple as in all insects 
and consists of the dorsal vessel which extends from the ninth segment 
of the abdomen to the head, where it spreads out upon the supra- 
cesophageal ganglia. There are nine pairs of alary muscles beginning 
between the metathoracic and first abdominal segments and continuing 
to lie between the segments as far back as between the eighth and ninth. 
The first four are slender but the remaining five are heavy and connect 
with the one in front and behind it. In front of each pair of muscles, a 
valve exists in the dorsal vessel, Plate XIV, Fig. 8. 


1922} Branch: Internal Anatomy of Trichoptera 2¢1 
BIBLIOGRAPHY. 
Betten, Cornelius. 1901. Aquatic Insects in the Adirondacks, N. Y. State Museum 


Bull. No. 47. 
The Larva of the Caddis-fly, Molanna cinerea Hagen Jr. N. Wi. Emto: Socs, 
Vol. X, pp. 147. 


Binet, Alfred. 1894. Contribution a l’étude du system nerveux sous-intestinal des 
insectes. Journ. l’Anat. et Physiol., XXX, 449-580. 


Blanchard E. De la circulation dans les insectes. 1848. Ann. Se. Nat. Zool. 3 ser. 
Du system nerveux des insects. Ann. Sc. Nat. Zool. 3 ser. T. V., pp. 273-379. 
Brauer, A. 1909. Die Stisswasserfauna Deutchlands Heft *% Trichoptera beard. 
v. G. Ulmer. 
Bruntz, L. 1904. Contribution a l'étude de l’excretion chez les Arthropodes Archive 
de Biologie, Vol. XX, pp. 335. 


Chun, C. 1876. Uber den Bau die Entwickelung und physiologische Bedeutung der 
Rectaldrtisen bie den Insecten. Naturforschenden Gesellsschaft, Zehnte 
Band. 


Clark, Cora H. 1891. Caddice Worms of Stony Brook. Pysche 1891, p. 153. 
Comstock, J. H. 1919. Introduction to Entomology. 


Cottie, J. Th. 1881. Beitrage zur Kenntnis des Chorda supra-spinal der Lepidoptera 
und des central, peripherischen und sympathischen nervensystems der 
Raupen. Zeitschr. fur wissensch. Zool., 1881, Bd. 35, pp. 304-320. 

Cummings, Bruce F. 1914. Scent Organs in Trichoptera. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 
1914, p. 459. 


Dufour, M. Leon. 1847. [Description et Anatomie d’une larve a4 branchies externes 
d’Hydropsyche. Ann. Se. Nat. Zool., ser 3, Vol. VIII, p. 341. 

Dujardin, Felix. 1850. Memorie sur le systeme nerveux des insectes. Ann. Sc. Nat. 
Zool., ser 3, Vol. XIV, pp. 195-206. 


Faivre, E. 1857. Du cerveau des Dytisques considéré dans ses rapports avec !a 
locomotion. Ann. Sc. Nat. Zool. ser 4, T 8. 

Fernald, C. H. 1890. Rectal glands in Coleoptera. Am. Nat., Vol. 24, 1890, p. 100. 

Gee, Wilson P. 1911. The Oenocytes of Platyphylax designatus Walker, Biol. Bul., 
Vol. 21, 1911, pp. 222-234. 

Gilson, Gustave. Recherches sur les cellules secretant. LaSoie et les appareil 
Sericigens. (1) Lepidoptera La Cellule VI, 1890. (2) Trichoptera La Cellule 
X, 1894. ; 

On the segmentally disposed Thoracic Glands in the larva of Trichoptera. 

Jr. Linn. Soc. London. Zool., Vol. 25, No. 164, pp. 407, 1896. 


Hammar, A. G. 1908. On the Nervous System of the Larva of Corydalis cornutus. 
Ann. Ento. Soc. Amer., Vol. 1, No. 2. 


Headlee, Thos. J. 1906. Blood Gills of Simulium pictipes. Am. Nat., Vol. 40, 


pp. 875 
Henneguy, L. 1904. Les Insectes, p. 463. 


Henseval, Maurice. Etude compareé des Glands de Gilson, La Cellule XI, 1895-6. 
Les glands buccales des larva de Trichoptera. La Cellule XII, 1897. 


Janet, Charles. 1898. Etudes sur les Fourmis, les Guepes et les Abeilles, Note 17. 
Kellogg, Vernon, 1905. American Insects. 


Kenyon, F. C. 1896. The Meaning and Structure of the socalled ‘‘Mushroom Bod- 
ies’’ of the Hexapod Brain. Am. Nat. Vol. 30, p. 643. 


Klapalek, Fr. 1888. Metamorphoses der Trichoptera, Serie I. Arch. Landesdf. 
Bohmen. Bd. VI, No. 5. 


Kolbe, H. J. 1893. Einfihrung in die Kenntnis der Insekten. 


Krauss, W. C. 1884. Nervous System in the Head of Corydalis cornutus Linn. 
Psyche Vol. 4, p. 179. 


272 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


Lucas, R. 1893. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Mundwerkzeuge der Trichopteren. 
Arch. f. Naturg. LIX, p. 285. 

Lubben, Heinrich. 1907. Uber die innere Metamorphose der Trichopteren Zool. 
Jahrb. Abt. Anat. Bd. 24, pp. 71-128. 

Marchal, Paul. 1892. Sur la motilite des tubes de Malpighi. Ann. Soc. Ento. Fr. 
T 61 Bulletin, p. CCLVI. 

Marshall, Wm. S. The Early History of the cellular Elements of the Ovary of a 
Phryganid, Platyphylax designatus Walker. Zeitschr-wiss. Zool. Bd. 86, 
pp. 217, 1907. 

On the Anatomy of the Dragon fly. Wisconsin Academy, Transactions 17, 

1914. 

Martynow, Von Andreas, 1901. Uber einige eigenthumliche Drisen bei den Trichop- 
teren larven. Zool. Anz. XXIV, No. 649, pp. 449. 

Miall and Hammond. 1900. The Structure and Life History of the Harlequin fly. 
pp. 83. 

Miall, L. C. 1905. Natural History of Aquatic Insects, Trichoptera, pp. 236. 

Mittler, Fritz. 1888. Larvae von Miicken und Haarfltiglern mit zweierlei abwech- 
selnd thatigen Athemwerkzeugen. Entomologische Nachrichten, Vol. 14, 
No. 18; p. 273. 

Needham, MacGillivray, Johannsen, Davis. 1903. Aquatic Insects in New York 
State Mus. Bull. 68, Ento. 18. 


Needham, J. G. 1897. Digestive Epithelium of Dragon fly Nymphs. Zool. Bull., 


Vole Nor 2: 
Noyes, Alice. The Proventriculus of an Hydropsyche Larva. Jr. Ento. & Zool., 
Vol. 7, 1915. 
Netspinning Insects of Cascadilla Creek. Ann. Ento. Soc. Amer., Vol. VII, 
No. 4, 1914. 


The Ecology of the Hydropschidae and Philopotamidae of Rapid Streams 
(unpublished paper). 
Packard, Alpheus S. 1898. A Text-book of Entomology. 
Palmen, J. A. 1877. Zur Morphologie des Tracheensystems. 
Patten, Wm. 1884. Development of Phryganids. Quat. Jr. of Micro. Soc., XXIV. 
Pictet, Francois Jules. 1834. Recherches pour servir a l’historie et l’anatomie des 
Phryganides. 
Rambur, M. P. 1842. Histoire Naturelle des Insectes, Neuropteres. 
Russ, E. L. Postembryonale Entwicklung des Darmkanals bei den Trichopteren. 
Zool. Jahrb. Abt. Anat. Bd. 25, pp. 675, 1907. 
Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Kopfdrisen der Trichopteren larven. Arch. Zool. 
Exp Orseraelo, LOO New Rem exele 
Schroder, C. 1912-13. Handbuch der Entomologie, Vol. I. 
Siltala, A. J. 1907. Uber die Nahrung der Trichoptera Acta. Soc. Fauna Flora 
fennica Bd. 29, No.5. 
Thienman, von A. 1903. Analkiemen bei den Larven von Glossosoma bolteni 
Curt. und einigen Hydropsychen. Zool. Anz. Bd. XXVII, Nr. 4. 
Tutt, J. W. 1896. The Relationship of the lower Lepidoptera with Trichoptera. 
Entem. Rec. Journ. Var., Vol. 8, pp. 25-29. 
Van Gehuchten, A. 1890. Recherches histologiques sur l’appareil digestif de la 
larva de la Ptychoptera contaminata. La Cellule T VI, p. 185 
Vorhies C. T. The Development of the Nuclei of the Spinning Gland cells of 
Platyphylax designatus Walker. Biol. Bull., Vol. 15, pp. 54-61, 1908. 
Habits and Anatomy of the Larva of the Caddis fly Platyphylax designatus 
Walker. Trans. Wis. Acad. Sc., Vol. XV, 1905. 


Zander Enoch. 1901: Beitrage zr Morphologie des Mannlichen Gesciilechtsan- 
hange der Trichopteren. Zeitschr-wiss Zool., Bd. 70, p. 192. 


Fig. 


Fig. 


Fig. 


Fig. 
Fig. 


Fig. 


Fig. 
Fig. 


Fig. 
Fig. 


Fig. 
Fig. 


Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 


Fig. 


Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 


Fig. 


Fig. 


Fig. 


Branch: Internal Anatomy of Trichoptera 273 


EXPLANATION OF PLATES. 


PLATE XIV. 
Central nervous system of Limnophilus indivisus and larval reproductive 
organs. 


Central nervous system of Phryganea interrupta and larval reproductive 
organs gdl=gonad from the ental lateral aspect. gd2=gonad 
frequently found and assumed to be the ovarian gonad. 


Central nervous system of Hydropsychodes analis and anal region with 
blood gills protruding from anus. 


Dorsal aspect of the supracesophageal ganglia of Limno philus indivisus. 


Lateral aspect of the supracesophageal and suboesophageal ganglia of 
Limnophilus indivisus. 


Ventral aspect of subcesophageal ganglion of Limnophilus indivisus. 
Transverse section through the ovary of H. analis. 
Ventral aspect of the circulatory system of L. indivisus. 


PLATE XV. 
Lateral aspect of the alimentary canal of Limnophilus indivisus. 


Oesophageal valve of Limnophilus indivisus. The portion of the canal 
containing the valve has been slit longitudinally and the valve laid 
open. 


A transverse cut back of the cesophageal valve. 


Diagram to show the relative position of the Malpighian tubules at the 
division between mesenteron and hind intestine. 


Transverse cut through the rectal valve at a level with 5 in Jarier il 


Lateral section through the cesophageal valve. The cephalic end of the 
valve is toward the bottom of the page. 


Lateral aspect of the alimentary canal of Hydropsychodes analis. 
Caudal aspect of anus of Hydropsychodes analis. 
Dorsal aspect of the anus of Hydropsychodes analis. 


Longitudinal section through the division point between mesenteron 
and hind intestine showing a valve, caudad of the Malpighian tubules; 
and the folded digestive epithelium of the mesenteron. 


Ventral aspect of the alimentary canal of Phryganea interrupta, only the 
ventral pair of tubules are figured. 


IPED D-QVAL. 


Diagram of the hind intestine of Hydropsychodes analis, with the levels at 
which the figures 1-6 are taken, indicated. 


Cross-section through the hind intestine at a point where a semi-rectal 
valve is formed by the invaginated folds of the intestinal wall. 


Cross section taken at level No. 2, showing the glandular structure of 
the large intestine. 


Cross section at level No. 3, showing the six folds of the small intestine 
with the cubical cell in the wall and the ental layer of circular 
muscles with the six pairs of longitudinal muscles. 

Cross section at level No. 4, showing the ectal row of circular muscles 
in addition to the condition in Fig. 3. 

Cross section at level No. 5, showing the beginning of the columnar 
epithelial cells and the breaking up of the six pairs of longitudinal 
muscles into a layer of smaller longitudinal muscles. 


274 


Fig. 


Fig. 


Fig. 


Fig. 
Fig. 


Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 


oN 


Annals Entomological Society of America  [Vol. XV, 


Cross section at level No. 6, showing the Malpighian tubules forming 
in the hind intestine; also the breaking up of the ectal circular muscles. 
Note the presence of intima which indicates the structure as being a 
part of the hind intestine. 


A cross section slightly cephalad of the level of Fig. 6, showing the 
digestive epithelium in diagram and the heavy layer of longitudinal 
muscles characteristic of the mesenteron. The ventral pair of 
Malpighian tubules are seen here just coming to the surface. 


A portion of a cross section of the mesenteron of Limnophilus indivisus, 
which shows the normal two rows of muscles. 


PLaTE XVII. 
Blood Gills of Hydropsychodes analts. 


Cross section of anal region to show the T-shaped anus. 70. 

Cross section through the anus with a gill lying inthe aperture. X 70. 
Cross section through the rectum showing all four gills. X 70. 

Cross section through the ‘‘so-called rectal valve.’’ > 140. 


Sagittal section of the gill region showing the intestinal wall invagina- 
tions that make the valve as at Fig. 4, and later make the gill wall 
itself and are continuous with the rectal wall caudad of the gills. 


Sagittal section of the gill region to show the retractile muscle of the 
gill and the relation to the body wall. 


Sagittal section of the gill region with the blood gills extended in 
function. X 125. 


Cross section of a functioning gill showing the three muscle branches. 
The blood which fills the gills when in function. X 320. 


IPTAREs xoveliile 


Dorsal view of the silk glands and Gilson’s gland of L. indivisus. 


Ventral view of the mouth parts of L. indivisus with the silk glands 
located. 


Lateral aspect of the mouth parts of L. indivisus. 

Dorsal aspect of the silk glands in relation to the subcesophageal 
ganglion. 

Lateral aspect of a portion of the silk gland. 

Cross section of the gland proper of the silk gland of H. analis. 


. Cross section of the gland proper of the silk gland of L. indivisus. 


Longitudinal section of a Malpighian tubule. 
Cross section of a Malpighian tubule. 


Dorsal aspect of the Gilson’s gland of P. interrupta in relation to the 
prothoracic ganglion. 


Dorsal aspect of the Gilson’s gland of L. imdivisus in relation to the 
prothoracic ganglion. 


Ventral aspect of the glands in the labial sclerite of L. imdivisus. X 120. 
Ventral aspect of the gland in a maxillary sclerite of L. indivisus. X 120. 
Ventral aspect of the maxillary gland of Henseval and Lucas. X 30. 
Ventral aspect of the mandibular gland. X 30. 


Cross section of several of the unicellular portions of the maxillary gland 
of Henseval and Lucas. X 30. 


1922| 


Branch: Internal Anatomy of Trichoptera 215 


INDEX TO FIGURES. 


a=anus. 

abg=abdominal ganglia 1 to 8. 
abs=abdominal segment 1 to 9. 
ant=antennal nerve. 

af=alary muscle 1 to 9. 
b=nerve to front of head. 
be=buccal cavity. 

bg=blood gills. 

bm=basement membrane. 
c=crura cerebri. 

cr=crop. 

em=circular muscles. 
cp=corpuscle. 

ct=conducting tubule. 
dep=digestive epithelium. 
dh=drag hooks. 

dv=dorsal vessel. 
ep=epithelium. 

ex =expansion area. 
excm=exterior circular muscle. 
fa=frontal arm. 

fg=frontal ganglion. 
gd=gonad. 

gdl =gonad in inner aspect. 


gd2=probable ovary of P. interrupta. 


ggl=Gilson’s gland. 
glep=glandular epithelium. 
gsp=spinneret of Gilson’s gland. 
in=intima. 

1=Lumen. 

lb1=labral nerve. 
1lb2=labral nerve. 
lb-s=labral sclerite. 
lil=labial nerve. 
1i2=labial nerve. 
li-s=labial sclerite. 
l-int=large intestine. 
Im=longitudinal muscle. 
md2=mandibular nerve. 


md-s=mandibular sclerite. 
me=mesenteron. 

mp= Malpighian tubule. 

mp1 =dorso-lateral pair. 
mp2=lateral pair. 
mp3=ventral pair. 
ms=mesothorax. 
mstg=mesothoracic ganglion, 
mt=metathorax. 
mttg=metathoracic ganglion. 
n=nucleus. 

oe = cesophagus. 

og=opening of gland. 

opt= optic nerve. 

oev = cesophageal valve. 

or =cesophageal ring. 
p=pigment. 

pm=gills press muscles. 
pr=proventriculus. 
pro=prothorax. 
protg=prothoracic ganglion. 


. ptm=perotrophic membrane. 


r=rectum. 

rm=retractile muscle. 
mm=recurrent nerve. 

rv=rectal valve. 

rw=rectal wall. 

s=sympathetic ganglion. 

sb-oeg = sub-oesophageal ganglion. 
spr-oeg = supra-oesophageal ganglion. 
ske= silk gland duct. 

skp=silk gland proper. 
sb=striated border. 

sm-int = small intestine. 
sp=spinneret. 

t=tubule. 

tr=trachea. 

y=ventral end of ovary. 


ANNALS HE. S. A. Vou. XV, Puate XIV. 


Hazel Elisabeth Branch. 


ANNALS E. S. A. Voz. XV, PLATE XV. 


Hazel Elisabeth Branch. 


ANNALS BE. S. A. Vou. XV, Puate XVI. 


fact 


a> 


ee 
\ () 
HA 


1 
ttf 


eS 
Ke 
‘3 
Wes 
Os 
WEX 
col 
< 
& 


y 

By 
oH, 
es) 


| fre 
i> 
y, 


Hazel Elisabeth Branch. 


Vou. XV,. Prats XVII. 


ANNALS FE. S, A. 


Hazel Elisabeth Branch. 


ANNALS E. S. A. Vou. XV, Prats XVIII. 


Hazel Elisabeth Branch. 


NOTICE TO MEMBERS AND CONTRIBUTORS. 


The Annals of the Entomological Society of America, pub- 
lished by the Society quarterly, includes the Proceedings of the 
Annual meetings and such papers as may be selected by the 
Editorial Board. 


Papers may be submitted to any member of the Editorial 
Board and should be as nearly as possible in the form desired as 
. final, preferably typewritten, and illustrations must be finished 
complete ready for reproduction. Plates must not exceed 5 x 7 
inches unless intended tofold. In general, papers to be accepted 
must be original, complete and previously unpublished and, 
except in connection with the proceedings, it will not be the 
policy to publish preliminary announcements or notes. Authors 
will be allowed fifty reprints gratis and additional copies at cost 
to the Society. 


The Managing Editor is provided with the most recent 
address of all paid-up members on record in the Secretary’s 
office for mailing the numbers of the Annals and members 
failing to receive their numbers should present their complaint 
to the Managing Editor within four months from the date of 
the mailing of the issue. After that time the numbers will 
be furnished only at the regular published rate. 


Requests for information as to membership and the annual 
dues of members~should be sent to the Secretary-Treasurer, 
Dr. C. L. MEtTcALrF, Natural History Building, University of 
Illinois, Urbana, IIl. 


. Communications relating to the ANNALS, and all orders for 
separate copies, reprints and back numbers should be addressed 
to the Managing Editor. 


SUBSCRIPTION RATES. 


The regular annual subscription price for the ANNALS is in 
the United States, Cuba, Porto Rico, Hawaii and Mexico, $3.00; 
Canada, $3.50; other countries, $4.00. Checks, drafts or money 
orders should be drawn payable to ANNALS ENTOMOLOGICAL 
SOCIETY OF AMERICA, and addressed to HERBERT OSBORN, 
State University, Columbus, Ohio, U. 5. A. 


CONTENTS OF THIS NUMBER. 


KERSHAW, J. C., and Muir, F.—The Genitalia of the 
Auchenorhynchous Homoptera-.-.........-..-- 201 


Ewinc, H. E.—The Phylogeny of the Gall Mites and 
a New Classification of the Suborder Prostigmata 
of the Order -Aearina sso 213 


ALEXANDER, C. P.—Undescribed Species of Siaealiss 
from: New Aealand>: Se oe ee eee 223 


Curran, C. Howarp—The Syrphid Genera Hammer- 
schmidtia and Brach yopa in Canadas: 57.5 oo 239 


BRANCH, HazeEt ELisABETH—A Contribution to the 
Knowledge of the Internal Anatomy of Trichoptera 256 


THE THOMAS SAY FOUNDATION 


A permanent- committee of the Entomological Society of America, 
engaged in publishing a series of memoirs on 
North American entomology, offers 


Vol. I. .Sarcophaga and Allies in North America 
By J. M. AtpricH 
304 pp., octavo, with 16 plates. Price in cloth binding, postpaid, $3.00. 


Address, Dr. E. D. BAtt, 
Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. C.— 


BACK VOLUMES 


Of the ANNALS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SocIETY OF AMERICA may 
be secured from the office of the Managing Editor and new members 
of the Society who may wish to complete a set are advised to secure 
the earlier volumes while. there is still a supply on hand and the price 
is kept at the original subscription rate. 


PRICE LIST OF PUBLICATIONS 


Annals; Vols. b-to XV; camplete, cack =< ho sees beat eecae sea oe $3.00 - 
Annals, Separate Parts, except-as below, each............ccceccceccevens 1.00 
Annats: Vols. Tand/ti- Parts) eachis wigs cs ocel Cotes oo eee: oe .50 
Annals: Volol V5 Part.4. each i S55 oes ae ee eee ae Srrie No 


Address HERBERT OsBorn, Managing Editor, - 
ANNALS ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 
Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 


Volume XV. Number 4. 


ANNALS 


OF 


The Entomological Society of America 


EDITORIAL BOARD. fi, Use 
nels aa] MMS 7 
HERBERT OSBORN, Managing Editor, 
CoLuMBUS, OHIO. 


CLARENCE H. KENNEDY, Ass’t Managing Editor, 
COLUMBUS, OHIO. 


A. D. HOPKINS,’ WM. S. MARSHALL, 
WASHINGTON, D. C. MADISON, WIs. 
A. L. LOVETT, VERNON L. KELLOGG, 
CORVALLIS, OREGON. WASHINGTON, D. C. 
S. A. FORBES, WM. M. WHEELER, 
URBANA, ILLINOIS. Boston, Mass. 
FRANK E, LUTZ, E. M. WALKER, 
NEw Yor«x Ciry, N. Y, TORONTO, CANADA. 


FREDERICK C. MUIR, 
HonoLvuLtv, Hawani. 


PUBLISHED QUARTERLY BY THE SOCIETY 
‘COLUMBUS, OHIO 


TT t= —————SSsSS—S——S—————oooooom—o—>=>=Lk£;:;:&=~—#&«=x&=x={{=_— — eee DEAT pec es _ 
Entered as second class matter April 11, 1908, at the Post Office at Columbus, Ohio, 
under the Act of Congress of Match 3, 1879. 


The Entomological Society of America 
Founded 1906. — 


OFFICERS 1922. 


President 
ARTHUR GIBSON . B ‘ aha : : Ottawa, Canada 


First Vice-President 
W. A. Rey. : ; ‘ : A St. Paul, Minnesota 


Second Vice President 
R.A: CooLtey |. i : : : 2 ! Bozeman, Montana 


Managing Editor Annals 
HERBERT OSBORN. : h . i : : Columbus, Ohio 


Secretary-Treasurer 
Cie VEBTCALR: 17/4; f : : : : : . Urbana, Illinois 


Executive Committee 


THE OFFICERS 


AND 
oi ME TADRDRICH, KE. M. WALKER, 


Wm. T. Davis, O. A. JOHANNSEN. 


Committee on Nomenclature 


BYP. PEt, T. D. A. CocKERELL, NATHAN BANKS. 


Thomas Say Foundation 


NATHAN BANKS, A.D, MacGrtrvray, P. P. CALVERT; 
E. B. WILLIAMSON, Wm. T. Davis, 
J. M. Atpricu, Editor. ~ E. D. Batt, Treasurer. 


Committee on National Museum 
HERBERT OssBorn, Chairman. 
C. W. JoHNSON, Wm. BARNEs, Wm. M. WHEELER, 
James G. NEEDHAM. 


“ANNALS 


OF 


The Entomological Society of America 


Volume XV DECEMBER, 1922 -Number 4 


NOTES ON FEMALE PARAIULIDS 
(Myriapods), with Description of a New Species. 


HENRY W. BROLEMANN, 
Pau (France). 


The material submitted to examination is composed of 
two species of Paeromopus and of six representatives of the 
genus Paraiulus. Of the two Paeromopus, one is the well 
known P. lysiopetalinus Karsch, while the other, being new 
to science, will be spoken of as Paeromopus Chamberlini and 
will be described hereafter. The Paraiulus species are P. 
tiganus Chamb., P. pennsylvanicus (Brandt) Wood, P. immacu- 
latus Wood, P. 1mpressus Say, P. venustus Wood, and the 
species recorded by the author (1895) as P. ellipticus Bollman. 
Most of the Paraiulus specimens have been obtained through 
the kindness of Ralph V. Chamberlin, of the Museum of 
Comparative Zoology, in Cambridge, to whom the write wishes 
to express herewith his indebtedness. 

It may safely be stated that, on the whole, the study of 
female Diplopods, and particularly of their sexual organs, 
has been completely neglected, attention having been almost 
exclusively devoted to the male copulatory apparatus. H. C. 
Wood (1865, Trans. Amer. Phil. Soc., XIII) is probably the 
first author having made use of the vulve in identifying 
Paraiulid species. 

The distrust in which the females.have been held is probably 
due to the fact that the male structures happened to be so 
multifarious and of such constancy as to-afford the easiest 


281 


282 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


and- most reliable means of identification of the species, while 
onjthe other hand the vulve appeared less manifold and did 
not supply equally favorable criteria. Another reason lies in 
this,that the vulve have long remained a mystery. 

Since 1909 (Sitzb. Ges. naturf. Freunde Berlin, 1909, 
No. 4), Verhoeff claimed to have settled the matter by holding 
that the vulve—as well as the penis— had to be identified 
with pairs of limbs. These were supposed to be the posterior 
limbs of the third segment, which the author admitted to be 


Fig. 1. Paeromopus lysiopetalinus; gnathochilarium, ventral aspect. 

Fig. Il. Paraivlus tiganus. Base of gnathochilarium of adult female, dorsal 
aspect. The postmentum, p, is fastened to the gula, G, along the 
line left blank, y. 

Fig. III.© Paraiulus venustus. Base of gnathochilarium of adult female seen 
obliquely from the side. 


double, as the abdominal segments. It was in fact but a mere 
personal view, supported by no convincing reasons, and has been 
contradicted by Brolemann & Lichtenstein (1919, Arch. Zool. 
exper. gen., LVIII, fasc. 4, mars, 1919), who admit that the 
so-called vulve are not the equivalent of limbs, but are merely 
superficial differentiations of the membrane surrounding the 
aperture of the oviduct. 

It is not deemed appropriate to recall in this paper the 
reasons which have prompted the opinions here recorded. 
Yet it will not be useless, in order to render the task easier 


1922] Brolemann: Female Paraiulids 283 


to readers of the following descriptions, to draw an elementary 
sketch of.a vulva and to make them acquainted with the 
terms which have been applied to the different parts of these 
puzzling organs. 

The two branches of the oviduct are known to end behind 
the legs of the second pair and to be capped with vulve. In 
most of the Diplopod groups (Colobognatha and Oniscomorpha 
excepted), the vulve are concealed in a deep depression of 
the intersegmental membrane, which will be known as the 
vulvar ‘‘vestibulum.’’ In some cases the vulve stand side 
by side in the vestibulum, while in some others they are sunk 
into independent, lateral invaginations of the vestibulum, 
apart from each other, (Fig. 3). The position of the vulve is 
therefore very different, according to the various cases; but 
whatever it may be, in order to make things obvious, a vulva 
is always considered isolated and standing with:its free end 
upwards (as represented in Figs. 26 and 27, Paraiulus penn- 
sylvanicus, for instance). 

In condition of rest, the terminal region of the oviduct 
may be compared to a funnel which has been pressed flat, 
causing the aperture to be linear and perpendicular to the 
main axis of the body. Immediately behind the aperture 
the neighboring surface is raised into a more or less projecting 
and rounded, always very conspicuous jutting, called the 
‘“mound.”’ Its lateral slopes are protected by chitinised plates, 
reminding one of the shells of a Lamellibranch, and con- 
sequently termed the (inner and outer) ‘‘valves,’’ (iv, Fig. 26). 
An apical space, the ‘‘ridge,’’ (7, Fig. 27), is left between the 
valves, made of colorless chitine, below which is to be seen a 
longitudinal chitinous, gutter-shaped thickening, the ‘‘apodema,”’ 
(a), extending perpendicularly to the aperture of the oviduct. 
The apodematic gutter communicates with the exterior by 
means of a longitudinal ‘‘slit,’’ which divides the ridge into 
more or less regular halves. 

In some cases the posterior ends of the valves remain free, 
the ridge being open backwards; in the case of Iulids, the 
valves are generally connected by, and often fused with a 
posterior-median plate, the anterior margin of which is emar- 
ginate and thickened in shape of a horse-shoe (‘‘horse-shoe 
plate’). The latter bounds the ridge caudad, (h, Fig. 27). 


284 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


Further backwards, behind the mound, a plate of very 
variable size and form may be observed, which is known as 
‘the ‘‘shield.’’ It is not unusually found amongst Polydesmids, 
Chordeumoids or Spirostreptoids, but has only been met with 
in a single [uloid Diplopod, Mesoblaniulus serrula, and its 
existence in Paeromopus is highly interesting, (s, Figs. 4, 8, 9). 

Cephalad the mound is fenced in by the posterior wall of the 
oviductal funnel; its anterior end is therefore flattened and 
may be spoken of as the ‘‘anterior truncation.”’ 


In front of the oviductal aperture is a more or less thickly 
chitinised, erected plate (0, Fig. 5, 26, etc.), the posterior 
surface of which is lined by the anterior wall of the funnel. 
Its outline is variable and made to fit the anterior truncation 
of the mound, whence the name ‘‘operculum’’ used for it. 


As a matter of fact, the vulve are by no means as simple as 
could ‘be inferred from the above rough sketch; but the latter 
will, perhaps, be sufficient from a morphological point of view, 
and readers interested in further details will kindly refer to 
Brolemann & Lichtenstein’s paper of 1919. Yet a few more 
words have to be devoted to a structure exceptionally met with 
in some American species. 


When the vestibulum is deep enough to conceal the vulve 
and to allow the third segment to meet the second above 
them, the operculum has very lttle importance as a protective 
plate (see P. tuganus). But when the summit of the vulva is 
on a level with the ventral surface, the operculum is made to 
shelter the mound from external contacts. For instance, in 
contradiction with what has been so far observed in other 
groups, the operculum of some of the species hereafter recorded 
is by far the largest plate of the vulva, the most interesting 
cases being those of the Paraiuli of the wmpressus group. In 
these species the vulve are coupled, the opercula of both vulve 
having become coalesced into an uncommonly large, tectiform 
plate, erected perpendicularly to the main axis of the body 
(y, Figs. 39, 46, etc.), the only trace of fusion left being a 
notch in the apical ridge; consequently this plate will be spoken 
of as a ‘‘synoperculum.’’ The mounds are located laterally 
in distinct, symmetrical dimples bounded distally and inwardly 
by diagonal edges of the operculum, delineating between them 
and the apical ridge a raised, triangular or heart-shaped space, 


1922] Brolemann: Female Paraiulids 285 


projecting caudad (‘‘heart-shaped projection’’).* The outline 
of the synoperculum, the depth of its apical notch, the size 
of the heart-shaped projection are different in each species 
and supply good criteria for the identification of adult females: 


Before entering into further details as to each particular 
case, some of the general features of the species under con- 
sideration may be mentioned. In Paeromopus the ventral 
duplicature of the mandibular stipe 1s short and more or less 
angular, while in Paraiulus it is produced into a rounded lobe, 
reaching about half the length of the cardo.. Ralph V. 
Chamberlin has published a drawing of the gnathochilarium 
of a male Paeromopus lysiopetalinus (Ann. Entom. Soc. Amer., 
III, No. 4, 1910, Pl. XLIII) which agrees almost entirely 
with our own, except that no plates are represented between 
the gulat and the base of the stipes. In Californian # and 9, 
P. Chamberlini, as well as in 9 P. lysiopetalinus (Fig. 1), 
two symmetrical narrow stripes are found, considered to 
represent the intermentum. However, a sexual dimorphism 
might account for this discrepancy and the matter has therefore 
to be investigated anew. The postmentum is constantly 
missing. . 

It has already been stated, 1902, that an intermentum and a 
postmentum, exist in both sexes of Paraiulus. However, a 
detail was at that time left unmentioned, i. e., that the post- 
mentum, which is independent in males, is fastened to the 
gula in females, the caudal margin of the former being fused 
with the dorsal concavity of the latter, as shown in Fig. II and 
III. In the Blaniulide, which are European representatives 
of the Paraiulidt phylum, the intermentum and the postmentum 
are both present, the latter always remaining independent, 
but being entire (Blaniuline) or divided into two plates 
(Isobatine). The female P. pennsylvanicus examined combines 
the two structures, as the postmentum is divided, as in I[so- 


*The origin of the “heart-shaped projection’’ will probably have to be sought 
for in the ‘‘hood’’ of Paeromopus. While in the latter it has become an almost 
independent plate through the effects of long lasting rectigradation, in Paraiulus, 
it has not reached the same grade of achievement owing to reasons still to be 
ascertained, but likely to be connected with Neotenia. 

7 Since his paper, 1902—Ann. Soc. Entom. France, LX XI—the author has 
been induced to accept the terms proposed by Verhoeff for the parts of the gnatho- 
chilarium. Consequently what was named mentum, hypostoma and ventral 
plate I in said paper, is now the intermentum, the postmentum and the gula. 


286 Annals Entomological Society of America [Mol=xeve 


batine, and yet is attached to the gula, as in other species of 
Paraiulus. 

In female Paraiuli, the second segment and the third are 
more or less swollen in accordance with the size of the vulve. 
The second segment is generally produced ventrad, the ventral 
margins of the tergo-pleural arch being twisted (Fig. 12, a) 
and bearing the so-called ventral lobes (/). On the surface 
of the twisted part occurs a transverse ‘‘ventral ridge’’ (n), 
surrounding cephalad a large and shallow dimple (w). Accord- 
ing to species the ventral ridge is more or less irregularly 
curved, the dimple resulting broader or longer. The third 
segment shows a still more irregular structure, as it sometimes 
tapers ventrally (tiganus), and sometimes grows longer (im- 
pressus—venustus); the ventral lobes may likewise be very 
different or much reduced. 

In Paeromopus (&@ and ¢), the ventral region of the three 
anterior, thoracic segments present a more simple structure, 
deemed to be archaic. The duplicatures of the collar lobes 
are more narrow and their angles are evenly rounded (not 
notched). No ventral lobes are found on the two following 
segments, the margins of which are diagonally converging 
backwards, the posterior angles being acute. Under contraction 
(Fig. 54), the three segments are forced into one another, 
their ventral margins uniting to build an oval frame, which 
is closed backwards by the sternal plate of the fourth segment, 
and in which fit the head with the mouth-parts, the limbs of 
the first and second pairs and the sexual apertures (vulve or 
penis) closely packed together. An exceptional case is likewise 
found in Paeromopus, as the sternite of the third pair of legs 
is not fused with the fourth tergo-pleural arch, as usual, but 
freely articulates with it, a condition realized in the Japanese 
genera Karteroiulus and Kopidoiulus. 

In all cases the limbs of the first pair remain independent 
and show no striking particulars; the sternite is usually missing 
(Fig. 2). The limbs of the second pair are preserved in Paero- 
mopus (Fig. 3), and are not coalesced; the sternal plate is 
scarcely chitinised and only between the stigmata, which are 
membranous dimples; the tracheal stalks are very long and 
slender, ribbon-shaped, bent backwards and outwards. The 
coxe are represented by their basal expansions only, the 
cylindrical part missing altogether and the telopodites articu- 


1922] Brolemann: Female Paraiulids 287 


lating on the inner angles of the basal expansions. The follow- 
ing joints show the normal structure of the ambulatory legs. 
The vulvar vestibulum is a wide depression closed by five folds 
made of tough membrane; of these, two anterior symmetrical 
folds (1, 2) run parallel with the basal expansions of the coxe, 
while two lateral symmetrical folds (3, 4) connected by a fifth 
median odd fold (5) surround the aperture backwards. On 
each side of the vestibulum are deep invaginations (z) in which 
the vulve are concealed. 


In Paraiulus the conditions change according to the groups, 
tiganus namely being strikingly different from the other species 
in respect of vulve, and until more material has been examined, 
no general diagram can be proposed. It seems, however, 
that the vulvar vestibulum is less developed, that the vulve 
are never hidden in independent invaginations and stand 
side by side on the middle line, and that the limbs of the second 
pair have always undergone a more or less advanced reduction, 
disappearing even entirely in some cases (7mmaculatus—penn- 
sylvanicus). 

In a larval stage of Paraiulus, supposed to be the last, 
the second pair of legs constantly has been found to exist, 
(Figs. 19, 20), but it differs from the ambulatory legs in that 
the basal coxal expansion is narrower and the cylindrical 
part is longer than usual. 


Genus Paeromopus Karsch, 1881. 
Paeromopus lysiopetalinus Karsch, 1881. 
(Fig. I and 1-5). 

Q. Length 133 mm.; diameter 7.25 mm.; 75 segments, of which 1 apodous; 
148 pairs of legs.—Adult. 

Q@. Length 142 mm.; diameter 7.96 mm.; 73 segments, of which 1 apodous; 
139 pairs of legs.—Adult. 

@. Length 144 mm.; diameter 6.80 mm ; 73 segments, of which 2 apodous; 


137 pairs of legs.—Adult. 
Sonoma County, California. 


These specimens do not entirely agree with Karsch’s description; 
the fact that the type is a large male, measuring 150 mm. with 80 
body segments, may account for the discrepancies. 

Color a very dark brown, with brownish limbs; clypeus fulvous; 
metazonites adorned between the pores with orange transverse bands. 
Body narrowed anteriorly, the diameter of the seventh segment being 
5.20 mm., that of the 24th segment 6.80 mm. Yet the second and 
third are more swollen than the neighboring segments. 


288 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


Clypeus transversely wrinkled or rugose. Antenne reaching as 
far back as the fifth segment; comparative measures of the joints as 
follows: 


istjomb<slensitht. 5 iss. 3 ooo eee 0.559 mm.; 

2d joint, length....... Se EGON bir S 1 OFS mim ssdiameter....as-55 5. 0.752 mm. 
SasjOint, lensthe: mn Ane eee 2..193 mm.; diameter............0.709 mm. 
Athajoint,alengb hyena era o eee ee b.9s3oummes diameters. ...05- eo. 0.623 mm. 
Deh omit elmer tie em ase es ware eee (2/63 mm? diameters.) ae 0.645 mm. 
Gthjomie lens thy <0 Sys Sa Liguatmene > diameter, 2c... 0.645 mm. 
(th=S8th-joints length = sas eea eee 0.301 mm. 

Rotalilen=tin 9-2 ene sd OF OG2 mmamme 


Mandibular stipe short, scarcely longer than the cardo (Fig. 1); 
mandibula much higher than broad, with numerous pectinate lamellze 
(12_to 14). Intermentum present, divided; postmentum wanting, 
the gula showing a single ventral ridge, (Fig. 1). Es 

First segment coarsely punctured dorsally; lateral lobes small, 
~ acute, with some § or 10 thin, shortened sulci closely packed together 
in the angle of the lobe. Second segment showing coarse punctures 
intermingled with faint longitudinal sulci dorsally, the punctures 
disappearing laterally, while the sulci grow deeper. Following segments 
distinctly sulcate even dorsally, with only few punctures along the 
posterior margin, the latter disappearing gradually backwards. First 
pore on the sixth segment, opening in front of, but close to the suture; 
further caudad the pores open behind the suture in the center of a small, 
smooth, indistinctly raised area. Segments without marginal fringe. 
Karsch devotes a special mention to some depressions to be seen on 
the segments behind the 18th, which have not been observed. 


Legs of the first and second pairs comparatively short. First 
sternal plate membranous; coxe of first pair expanded laterally with 
a slightly sinuous outer margin, and without a cylindrical apical part 
(Fig. 2). Second sternal plate scarcely chitinised between the stigmatic 
membranous dimples; tracheal stalks very long and slender, ribbon- 
shaped; coxze of second pair similar to those of the first, but somewhat 
shorter. 

Vulvee concealed in lateral, broad and moderately elongate, invagina- 
tions, their summit being on a level with the bottom of the vestibulum 
(Fig. 3). The operculum, in its anterior aspect, appears as a triangular 
plate strewn with short sete, the lateral margins of which are bent 
back perpendicularly, the outer more than the inner. It is tipped with 
a peculiar, hood-like appendage (c, Figs. 4, 5), laterally compressed, 
overlapping the mound and bearing few sete. 

The mound is protected laterally by oval valves moderately pilose, 
standing vertically (ov). Their upper angles. are connected by what 
appears to be (in posterior aspect) a thick, strongly chitinised, quad- 
rangular pad (k), which is the basal end of the horseshoe plate) The 
upper forks of the latter, as well as the ridge lying between them, are 
bent forwards so as to face the concavity of the operculum, thus 
assuming the position of the anterior truncation. The ridge is wide, 


1922] Brolemann: Female Paraiulids  . 289 


lobed cephalad, and divided by a slit which is narrow anteriorly, but 
abruptly widens backwards. The apodematic gutter (a) is moderately 
elongate and bears numerous loops and two apical, small, globular 
diverticula (d). 

The space left free between the valves and behind the horseshoe 
plate is filled by a plain, subquadrangular plate (s) somewhat broader 
than long and slightly convex, equivalent to the shield of some 
Polydesmus; its upper margin slightly encroaches on the posterior 
margin of the horseshoe plate, but does not seem fit to cover completely 
the plate. 


Paeromopus chamberlini, n. sp. 
(Fig. 6—9). 
9. Length about 84 mm.; diameter 5.10 mm.: 68 segments of which 2 apodous; 


127 pairs of legs.—Adult. 
Mt. Shasta, California. 


Resembles the preceding species in many features such as relative 
length of the clypeus and of the antennz, structure of the gnatho- 
chilarium, of the anterior body segments, of the first pair of legs, etc.* 


The mandibular stipe is not much longer than the cardo (Fig. 6); 
it is gradually narrowed anteriorly, the apical angle being slightly 
produced and acute. 


Lateral expansions of the coxe of second pair much developed 
(Fig. 7), strongly and evenly arched. The cylindrical part entirely 
missing. The posterior surface is unusually callous paramesally (y) 
and strongly projects backwards, hanging over the aperture of the 
vestibulum. The vulve appear spindle-shaped on the whole (Fig. 8), 
being more restricted proximally than in lysiopetalinus. The main 
body of the operculum show no special structure, but the hood (b) is 
larger and broader, more sharpened apically and more expanded caudad, 
made to cover entirely the mound. The latter (Fig. 9) is longer than 
high, the valves are lower and more rounded, the horseshoe plate 
and the ridge are less bent forwards, more horizontal and only partly 
encroach upon the anterior truncation. The horseshoe plate (hk) being 
angularly excised, the ridge is triangular; the slit is not broadened 
caudad. The apodematic gutter is rather short, depressed in the 
middle, provided with two short diverticula (d); the anterior 
diverticulum is irregularly swollen and sitting, while the posterior 
is globular and borne on a short, slender stalk. 

The shield (s) is as broad as the mound, strongly convex, with 
rounded base and straight distal margin. The membranous connection 
between the shield and the horseshoe plate being wide, the shield is 
admitted to glide over the mound and join the hood of the operculum, 
the ridge thus becoming entirely hidden from view. 


* Further details to be found in the description of the male given ‘‘in fine.”’ 


290 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


Genus Paraiulus Humbert & Saussure, 1869. 
Paraiulus tiganus Chamberlin, 1910. 
(Figs. II and 10-21). 


9. Length 37 mm.; diameter 2.44 mm.; 56 segments, of which 2 apodous; 
102 pairs of legs.—Adult. 

Q. Length (?); diameter 2.48 mm.; 55 segments, of which 2 apodous; 100 - 
pairs of legs.—Adult. 

Q. Length (?); diameter 2.44 mm.; 55 segments, of which 2 apodous; 100 
pairs of legs.—Adult. 

Q. Length 39 mm.; diameter 2.38 mm.; 54 segments, of which 2 apodous; 
98 pairs of legs.—Adult. 

9. Length 29 mm.; diameter 2.05 mm.; 52 segments, of which 2 apodous; 94 
pairs of legs.*—Immature. 


Adult Female.—Interocular sulcus deeply impressed. Antenne 
moderately elongate; comparative measures of joints as follows: 


lst jointlengthivarce eee eee eee 0.192 mm; 
ACh Ointwl eneitiiee repens te ete re 0.608 mm.; diameter...........0.224 mm. 
Srdgointal engthee atime acer 0.544 mm.; diameter...........0.240 mm. 
Ache ointwlencthe nee re eae eere et errr 0.512 mm.; diameter...........0.240 mm. 
Oth yomt length: oases ee eee 0.480 mm.; diameter...........0.288 mm. 
Gthejomt alens then eee eer 0.448 mm.; diameter...........0.272 mm. 
PDAS GOvbahe, WSN, .oonooncsc ps ancnne 0.192 mm. : 
nlotallyl GracGlaaereers eee ern eee 2.976 mm.. 


Mandibular cardo (Fig. 13) equal to two-thirds of the stipe. Mandib- 
ular stipe short and broad (ratio: 1. 6 x b. 5), rounded anteriorly. 
Promentum entirely dividing the lamine linguales; the latter bear six 
setze in a longitudinal row, besides the usual premarginal bristle. 

Second and third segments (Figs. 10, 11) conspicuously swollen. 
Profile of second segment angular; ventral ridges low (Fig. 13), almost 
regularly curved; dimples oval, broader than long; ventral lobes large, 
over-lapping each other. Third segment tapering ventrally, with 
profile scarcely convex. Anterior aspect as in Fig. 13, B. 

Legs of second pair much reduced (Fig. 14). The sternite (S) is a 
short but broad stripe, with posterior margin straight and outer angles 
unusually produced. Tracheal:stalks more or less developed. The 
Six joints of the limbs are preserved, all except the two distal joints 
being shorter than broad; first joint almost completely fused with the 
sternal plate; last joint oval, tipped with a spine-like claw. 

Vulvar vestibulum moderately deep, with a wide aperture not 
constricted by symmetrical folds, fastened to the duplicatures of the 
third segment and to the anterior margin of the fourth. The vulve 
sit at the bottom of the vestibulum side by side, the operculum facing 
externally and somewhat forwards. 

The mound is a very low, semi-cylindrical body, the walls of which 
represent the horseshoe plate probably fused with the valves (Figs. 
15, 18). The inner region of the wall is more raised and more convex 
than the outer, causing the mound to be asymmetrical, with the ridge 


* The last leg-bearing segment has but a single pair of limbs. 


1922] Brolemann: Female Paraiulids 291 


gently sloping outwardly. An abbreviated sulcus is seen on each side 
of the wall, running close to, and parallel with the anterior truncation, 
which is rather broad. The apodema (a) does not exceed the second 
third of the ridge; it is deeper in the middle than at both ends and 
sends forth a median, club-shaped, and an apical, strangely hooked 
diverticulum (d, Fig. 15, 18). The operculum (0) is a quite unimportant 
plate, the form of which is not even definite, as in one of the specimens 
examined it was scarcely chitinised, while in another no trace of chitinisa- 
tion could be observed, the operculum being represented by a soft 
membranous fold. 

Immature Female —In an immature female (Fig. 19, 21), the sternal 
plate of the second pair of legs is three times broader than long in the 
middle, slightly arched, with the median angle scarcely produced. 
The immature vulve (W, Fig. 19) sit on a membrane stretched behind 
the second pair of limbs, on a level with the laterally reflexed ends of 
the sternite. Each vulva is formed of three rounded swellings disposed 
diagonally, the anterior-outer swelling (O, Fig. 21) being the operculum, 
the anterior-inner (iv) representing the inner half of the mound, and 
the posterior (ov) the outer half. A rudimentary conic apodema (a) 
is to be observed between the two last mentioned swellings. 


It is well worth insisting upon the features of the vulve of 
P. tiganus, as not only the condition of the operculum is decid- 
edly exceptional, having never been met with before, but the 
aspect of the whole organ is so different from what will be 
found in the following species, that the relationship between 
the latter and tiganus appear very distant, as far as vulve are 
concerned. 


Paraiulus pennsylvanicus (Brandt, 1840), Wood, 1865. 
(Fig. 22-27). 


9. Length 39 mm.; diameter 2.25 mm.; 64 segments, of which 2 apodous; 
118 pairs of legs.—Adult. 

9. Length 34 mm.; diameter 2.15 mm.; 60 segments, of which 2 apodous; 
110 pairs of legs.—Adult. 


Interocular sulcus moderately impressed. Mandibular cardo (Fig. 
24), shorter than in P. tiganus, about two-fifths of the length of the 
stipe. Breadth of the stipe equal to two-thirds of its length; anterior 
and ventral edges unite in an evenly curved line without any trace 
of an anterior angle. The promentum thins out apically, the lamine 
linguales being almost in contact; the latter bear a row of three to four 
short sete and two premarginal long bristles. 

Anterior body segments almost cylindrical, the diameter of the 
second segment is only a little larger than that of the head (Fig. 22, 23). 
Profile of the second segment rounded; ventral ridges raised; dimples 
more or less angular and subquadrate (Fig. 25, A); ventral lobes broad, 
encroaching on each other. The third segment is not shortened 


292 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


ventrally; the inner pleural margins are thickened; to their posterior 
angles are attached flattened lobes, twisted perpendicularly, which 
overlap each other; the anterior angles are produced into strongly 
chitinised hooks bent dorsally (Fig. 25, B). The upper ends of the 
hooks are connected by a tough membrane, stretched perpendicularly, 
in the middle of which are found the relics of the atrophied sternite 
of the second pair of legs (P2). These relics consist of a subreniform, 
irregularly chitinised, transverse plate, with no definite outline, showing 
traces of stigmata and of tracheal stalks; the limbs have disappeared 
altogether. 


The space left between the membrane and the ventral lobes is 
filled with vulve. The vestibulum could not be observed, being 
probably shallow. The vulvz stand side by side, connected by soft 
membrane, with the operculum facing cephalad. The general appear- 
ance of a vulva is that of a truncate spindle or of a tiny cask. The 
operculum is flattened, oval in outline, and bears macrochaete disposed 
in four longitudinal rows, two lateral and two paramedian rows, the 
latter converging proximally. The valves (iv, Fig. 26), are almond- 
shaped, with a median row of bristles, and stand erect. The central 
part of the mound, i. e., the horseshoe plate and the ridge framed by 
its branches, are strictly comparable to the mound of tiganus, which 
would have undergone a caudal rotation of 45°, causing the ridge to 
face fully backwards (Fig. 27). Ridge oval. The slit divides the 
summit of the mound and part of the ridge into fairly symmetrical 
halves. The apodema is short, but ends in an extremely long, slightly 
sinuous, tubular diverticulum. 


Paraiulus immaculatus Wood, 1864. 
(Fig. 28-34). 


Q. Length 36 mm.; diameter 2.65 mm.; 51 segments, of which 2 apodous; 
92 pairs of legs.—Adult. 

Q. Length 31 mm.; diameter 2.10 mm.; 51 segments, of which 2 apodous; 
92 pairs of legs.—Adult. 


Interocular sulcus not impressed. Antenne moderately long, 
not exceeding the fourth segment; comparative measures of joints as 
below: 


iStiHoimt engthentes seins. coer 0.160 mm.; 
AoW fonraeselksraterel ils, oak SAE cede nm. 68 oy BER E 0.544 mm.; 
aya le opuatinal(Srave telnet 25) a a Rol a eee e 0.480 mm.; 
AN Elo (Ovi Tt ANAC lew occa o & oo Bee doo Shee s 0.448 mm.; 
icin ora, WSN oo hos osoecassoddnce me 0.416 mm.; diameter...........0.208 mm. 
Gis omits ene theese ois Se ae 0.352 mm.; diameter...........0.224 mm 
7Adarsieln Goubmi, WAMBAAM: 5.505 cc odoas sone 0.128 mm. 
‘Motalaleng thine .cers acme hee ee 2.528 mm. 


Mandibular cardo (Fig. 30) about equal to three-fourths of the 
stipe, the latter being longer than usual, and rounded anteriorly. 
Mandibula furnished with 8 to 9 pectinate lamella. Promentum 


1922] Brolemann: Female Paraiulids 293 


narrow, shorter than the lamine linguales, the inner angles of which 
are almost in contact. Each lamina bears two sete and two pre- 
marginal bristles. 


Anterior segments not obviously swollen (Figs. 28, 29). Ventral 
region of second and third segments produced far beyond the collum. 
Second segment with posterior margin raised and abruptly excised, 
and with short, triangular ventral lobes. Ventral ridge strong, almost 
angularly bent; the dimples are broader than long and _ stretched 
diagonally (Fig. 31, A). The third segment is not narrowed ventrally; 
its pleural margins are excised, the posterior angles ending into short, 
ventral lobes, the apex of which remain separated by a wide gap (Fig. 
29). The anterior angles send forth rounded processes which are 
connected by a chitinous bridge (P2), homologous with the sternite 
of the second pair of legs. The sternal bridge shows traces of the 
stigmata and of the tracheal stalks, the limbs being completely 
atrophied. 


The sternal bridge, the pleural excision and the ventral lobes of 
the second segment circumscribe an oval space through which the 
summit of the vulve is seen to protrude. Wood (1865, p. 200, Fig. 33) 
has given a drawing of the vulve of immaculatus, which gives a correct 
idea of their general aspect. The vulve stand side by side and cling 
together, although no fusion seems to intervene (Fig. 32). The 
operculum is a thick, subquadrangular plate, more than twice as high 
as broad, with blunt angles; the bristles of the anterior surface are rare 
and only to be found near the apical margin. On its posterior surface 
a thickening is seen adjacent to the inner distal angle and projecting 
above the ridge of the mound (H, Figs. 32, 33). The latter is extremely 
asymmetrical. Seen in posterior aspect, the outer valve (ov) appears 
as a triangular plate gradually narrowed proximally and truncate 
distally, the distal margin being about half the length of the plate; 
it. leans inwardly so as to cover most of the posterior surface of the 
organ. The inner valve (iz) is more like a subcylindrical pillar, much 
lower than the outer valve; yet its base being on a level with the center 
of the outer valve, its summit considerably exceeds the apical truncation 
of the latter and almost reaches the top of the operculum. No horse- 
shoe plate is present, unless an apical thickening of the outer valve, 
which connects it with the inner valve, be considered to be its homologue. 
The ridge is hidden to view, being bent cephalad and dipping obliquely 
towards the base of the organ (Fig. 34). The apodema is very short 
and sends forth a comparatively small, pear-shaped diverticulum. 

The sternal plate of the third pair of legs has a special shape, different 
from that of the other segments in having the anterior angles produced 
laterally and the sides sinuous. 


It is noteworthy that, in zmmaculatus, conditions are similar 
to those met with in é7ganus, in so far as the vulvar chamber has 
a rigid aperture supplied by the third segment. However, the 
comparison cannot be carried on any further as the vulve 


294 Annals Entomological Society of America EVol: evs 


widely differ in both species, zmmaculatus more approaching 
those hereafter dealt with. In spite of the special form of its 
mound, the relationship can be traced in the structure of the 
operculum, the subapical thickening of which is undoubtedly a 
preliminary stage of the heart-shaped projection of the synoper- 
culum of zmpressus. 


Paraiulus impressus Say, 1821. 
(Fig. 35-42). 


Q. Length 33 mm.; diameter 2.20 mm.; 53 segments, of which 2 apodous; 
96 pairs of legs.—Adult. 

9. Length 26 mm.; diameter 1.77 mm.; 53 segments, of which 3 apodous; 
95 pairs of legs. —Immature. 

9. Length 25 mm.; diameter 1.78 mm.; 53 segments, of which 3 apodous; 
95 pairs of legs.—Immature. 


Adult Female.—Interocular sulcus slightly depressed. Antennz 
about the same length as in zmmaculatus, but comparative measures of 
joints somewhat different: 


lstiointwlensit haere acre eer 0.160 mm.; 

2dijoint, leno there. eae 0.576 mm.; 

SA GOIN OM Sb ees sca ccsy hearer ioe Q-ol2 mim; idiameterss: ores .0.208 mm. 

ANsoynfopinif, WSR locoooooaseuoagowob odors 0.448 mm.; diameter........... 0.208 mm. 

OEM Ont len shina nee Nee ane 0.480 mm.; diameter........... 0.240 mm. 

(HHO forme, Woes sooasconsodousboao ue 0.416 mm.; diameter.......... -0.256 mm. 

Cd siela sfonwoes MENA, 6 Gas db oabosonooe. 0.128 mm. 
Motalulensitherts...<dioor ee ee 2.720 mm. 


Gnathochilarium as in tiganus, but less narrowed proximally (Fig. 
38); laminze linguales bearing three sete besides the premarginal pair. 
Mandibular cardo about two-thirds of the stipe; breadth of mandibular 
stipe about four-fifths of its length; anterior margin truncate, with 
lower angle obvious (Fig. 35). 

Second and third segments much swollen (Figs. 35, 36), their ventral 
surface protruding far beyond the angles of the collum and appearing 
rounded in profile. Ventral. ridge of second segment less sinuous than 
in the preceding species; dimples as high as broad, almost triangular; 
the ventral lobes remain disjoined (Fig. 37, A). Third segment growing 
longer ventrally; inner margins almost straight, converging backwards, 
with rounded anterior angles and short ventral lobes, reflexed and 
prominent. Ventral aperture wide, filled by the vulvee, which are 
never completely concealed (except in contracted condition of the 
animal). 

A rough sketch has already been given in the preceding chapter. 
The synoperculum sits on a broad base and is narrowed distally, its 
apical margin being equal to about half its base (Figs. 39, 40). The 
dwarfed legs of the second pair (P2) are attached to its anterior surface, 
no sternal plate being recognizable; the legs are composed of six joints 


1922] Brolemann: Female Paraiulids 295 


shorter than broad, their apex not overreaching the distal margin of 
the synoperculum. The latter is interrupted mesad, the notch being 
comparatively narrow and shallow. The heart-shaped projection 
(H, Fig. 40) is slightly impressed longitudinally in connection with the 
notch; its lateral edges are attenuate and unite proximally with a low, 
flattened, perpendicular keel, dividing the basal excavations. 

The mound (Figs. 40, 41) is a globular, asymmetrical body, entirely 
clad with the valves, which are fused with the horse-shoe plate and 
only connected caudad by a narrow, not particularly chitinised bridge. 
The inner valve is the longest; it is inflated caudad, its upper margin 
being feebly lobed; cephalad is a low, sharpened, diagonal crest (c). 
The outer valve is divided anteriorly by a wide perpendicular furrow 
(w), the bottom of which is membranous, the valve being conspicuously 
gibbous immediately backwards of the furrow. The upper margins 
of the valves are pressed together, concealing the ridge. The 
apodematic gutter (a, Fig. 41) is located in the anterior half of the 
mound; it appears distorted by numerous loops and terminates in a 
long and comparatively thick, gradually tapering diverticulum. 


Ventral region of the fourth segment, as in Fig. 37, B. 


Immature Female.—In a larva of the last stage, the mandibular 
stipe is gently narrowed anteriorly and rounded apically. The second 
and third segments are neither swollen nor produced ventrad; the third 
is very different from what it is in adult and more approaches the 
condition of the second segment, being even shorter than the latter. 
The main points of the structure of the second pair of legs have already 
been recorded. 

The immature vulve (Fig. 42) are considerably more developed 
than in the tiganus larva, being broader than the second sternite, 
and several details being noticeable. The opercula have already 
coalesced, their evenly arched upper margins uniting mesad and giving 
rise to a wide angular notch; on each side of the notch the posterior 
surface of the synoperculum shows the raised area which, in the adult 
organ, will be fused in a heart-shaped projection. The mounds are 
broader than high and of comparatively much larger size than in the 
adult; yet no other detail of their structure is obvious but a rudimentary 
apodematic thickening. 


Paraiulus venustus Wood, 1864. 
(Fig. 43-50). 
?. Length 33 mm.; diameter 2.45 mm.; 51 segments, of which 2 apodous; 


92 pairs of legs.—Adult. 

9. Length 33 mm.; diameter 2.42 mm.; 50 segments, of which 2 apodous; 
90 pairs of legs.—Adult. 

9. Length 25 mm.; diameter 2.05 mm.; 51 segments, of which 2 apodous; 
93 pairs of legs.—Immature. 


296 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vole XVe 


Adult Female.—Resembles impressus in most of its features. Antenne 
as below: 


ispmoimbe lemectlatae ts: .ereyn eee es .0.224 mm.; 
Day oinit, lene Glatt ge ores a ens eae 0.544 mm.; diameter...........0.208 mm. 
Sal joint lene thy ar eee eee 02512 mms; diameter. (...2e.¢. OaZ208smmr- 
Ath ouat peng thien ss mst cries | hates 0.448 mm.; diameter...........0.208 mm. 
FEHR Oimt leno sersepecan oe ln Tee 0.448 mm.; diameter...........0.240 mm. 
Gthsointalenstheenesa ane aaa eee 0: 432) mm. > diameter. :.7.... 10: 256 mm: 
7AelmAciela yfoubolies, Wevavesialng Sasa saan. geo. 0.096 mm 

Movaislensth sss eae Oe amas 


Mandibular stipe truncate, but scarcely angular below. Lateral 
lobes of first segment not evenly rounded, a posterior angle being 
obvious. The second and third segments are appreciably more swollen, 
in relation with the larger size of the vulve (Figs. 43, 44). The posterior 
ventral margin of the second segment is raised and rounded, causing 
the ventral dimple to be almost as long as broad, trapeziform (Fig. 
45, A). The third segment is much longer ventrally than dorsally; 
the inner pleural margins are parallel and nearly straight; but the 
ventral lobes are so small and so widely separated that the vulvar 
aperture 1s practically open backwards and reaches as far back as the 
fourth segment, (Fig. 44). 

The vulve are uncommonly large (Fig. 46, 47). H. C. Wood 
(1865, p. 197, Fig. 29) has issued a description and a drawing of these 
organs which, though reduced are perfectly appropriate; yet he fails to 
mention that the ‘“‘flattened cylinders”’ are coalesced. Compared with 
the similar organ of impressus, the synoperculum is more quadrate, its 
outer margins being perpendicular (slightly emarginate) and its breadth 
hardly different distally and proximally. The median notch is larger, 
with rounded bottom. The edges of the heart-shaped projection 
(H, Fig. 47) are considerably expanded into broad, flattened triangular 
lobes, reaching laterally the outer margins of the synoperculum and 
overlapping the distal half of the excavations in which the mounds are 
sheltered; the outer margins of the lobes converge towards the base 
of the synoperculum without meeting, entirely disjoining the mounds. 


’ 


The ‘‘pair of very slender, almost filiform, feet-like bodies’? men- 
tioned by Wood in connection with the synoperculum, are the atrophied 
limbs of the second pair which are fastened to its anterior surface. As 
in impressus the six joints are preserved, being broader than long and 
of irregular size. In addition a small sternal plate was present in the 
specimen examined. 

The lateral outline of the mound reminds of a crescent, the lower, 
rounded end of which is abruptly bent inwardly below the mound 
(Fig. 48). A narrow cleft divides the organ into two subequal halves, 
which are only connected caudad by the reflexed end of the crescent 
(h, Fig. 49), this being equivalent to the horse-shoe. No dividing 
sulcus exist between the latter and the valves. Cephalad each valve 
bears a sharp diagonal crest, both crests meeting at the anterior end 
of the crescent. The anterior region of the inner valve which faces 


1929] Brolemann: Female Paraiulids 297 


the synoperculum is poorly chitinized, but lacks the furrow observed 
in impressus. The apodematic gutter (a) is by one-third shorter 
than the mound; it appears distorted by numerous, densely packed 
loops and terminates caudad with a long, rod-like diverticulum, bent 
at right angles near its base and clavately enlarged apically (d). 

The sternite of the third pair of legs is unusually widened cephalad, 
its breadth largely exceeding half the diameter of the segment (Fig. 
45, B). 

Immature Female.——In a larva admitted to belong to the last stage, 
the mandibular stipe is rounded in front, no trace of inferior angle 
being obvious. The second segment has its ventral margins less pro- 
duced. The third is quite different from the corresponding mature 
segment, as it is gradually narrowed ventrally, the inner margins running 
obliquely in the lobes, very much as in the second segment. The 
second pair of limbs is unmodified, i. e., it shows the structure of the 
ambulatory legs, except that the coxe are longer, as is the case with 
larvee of other species. 


The immature vulve (Fig. 50) remind of those of impressus, as 
the opercula are low, transverse plates, with distal margin gently 
arched, but not fused mesad. The mounds appear as_half-moon- 
shaped bodies, divided by a shallow depression, with a linear slit and 
rudiments of the horse-shoe and of a digitiform diverticulum. 


Paraiulus ellipticus Bollman, 1887. 
(Brolemann, 1896-1902).* (Figs. 51, 52). 


Gnathochilarium as in pennsylvanicus. The twisted ventral lobes 
of the third segment are very prominent ventrad. A rough outline of 
the anterior aspect of same and of one of the limbs of the second pair 
has been published in 1902. Traces of the second sternite are preserved. 


Synoperculum very deeply split mesad (Fig. 51); on each side the 
distal margin is slightly curved and sloping laterally, being in addition 
strewn with tiny sete. Lateral margins sinuate, prominent at a short 
distance from the base. Heart-shaped projection (H) somewhat as 
in venustus, its edges being likewise expanded into flattened lobes, 
but the latter remaining far apart from the outer margins of the syn- 
operculum; the lobes converge abruptly, uniting in a ploughshare-like 
process (x) bent cephalad and driven between the summit of the 
mounds (M), the bases of which remain in contact. The valves of the 
mound are very dissimilar, the outer (ov, Fig. 52) being somewhat 
higher and appreciably shorter than the inner, causing the ridge to 
face obliquely backwards and externally. The ridge (7) is wide and 
divided by a conspicuous slit. The apodematic gutter is comparatively 
short, dipping perpendicularly, provided with some rounded loops 
and with a fairly long diverticulum, much as in venustus. 


* This specimen being no longer in the author's collection, the secondary 
structures had to be omitted. 


298 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


DESCRIPTION OF A NEW SPECIES. 


Paeromcepus chamberlini n. sp. 
(Figs. 53-57). 


o&. Length about 111 mm.; diameter 4.60 mm.; 79 segments, of which 1 
apodous; 149 pairs of legs.—Adult. 

o. Length about 93 mm.; diameter 5.12 mm.; 71 segments, of which 
2 apodous; 131 pairs of legs.—Adult. 

Mount Shasta, California. 


Pleural regions black, or at least very dark brown; a broad lively 
orange band runs dorsally from the first tergite to the last, almost 
entirely filling the space between the pores; the band thins out anteriorly; 
posteriorly it covers the margins of the anal valves. Clypeus fulvous, 
with yellow margin. Limbs brownish. 


Labral plate very obvious, the anterior margin of the clypeus being 
somewhat swollen; mesal notch deep. Clypeus elongate, almost three 
times the length of the epicranium; surface rather flattened, leathery, 
with but few setiferous punctures, of which a pair stands in a line with 
the antenne. Epicranium unusually short, longitudinally rugose, 
divided by a distinct sulcus. A less marked transverse sulcus connects 
the inner angles of the eyes; behind, and in contact with it is the usual 
pair of setiferous dimples which is formed by coupled punctures. 
Antenne long, yet not extending over the fourth segment; measures of 
joints as below: 


listyointwlensthmeae nee: cmt 0.256 mm.; 
Ddimoints len sith sr cic oaeekoeere estes 1.344 mm.; diameter...........0.544 mm. 
Sd Omt lengthier eee eee an ore oe 1.728 mm.; diameter...........0.544 mm. 
AChoOinta lengitbhee srr seers macraeiee 1.440 mm.; diameter...........0.448 mm. 
Dtchejointinelenethe eeepc eee 1.3874 mm.; diameter...........0.480 mm. 
Gthgjoint sleng tha eee asec eee IL IGE vaavano9 GheWaNENEIE coco onedce 0.480 mm. 
dth-Ssthijoimt, length. ..2-- snes soe Ol OZ emmar 

Totallength . S7 ssw er sere eee 7.518 mm. 


Ocelli distinct, numbering about 22 (7, 6, 5, 4), collected on a sub- 
triangular field. Mandibular stipe (Fig. 53) almost quadrate, not 
longer than high, produced ventrally and with its anterior angle some- 
what angular. Gnathochilarium as in female /ysiopetalinus, 1. e., 
with intermentum and without postmentum. 


Collum strewn dorsally with numerous, moderately coarse punctures. 
Lobes small, angular, marked with four or five short and thin sulci. 
Following segments very much as in lysiopetalinus, the metazonites 
bearing sulci intermingled with punctures; sulci strongly impressed 
anteriorly, less deep but more numerous backwards. First pore on the 
sixth segment; the five or six anterior pores are located behind, and in 
contact with the suture, which is slightly sinuous; further caudad the 
pores and more and more removed from the suture, so as to open in 
the first and third of the metazonite. Last tergite very short; its 
posterior margin is thick and scarcely produced, leaving uncovered the 


1922] Brolemann: Female Paraiulids 299 


dorsal angles of the anal valves. The latter are moderately prominent, 
much higher than long, scarcely rugose, with a tiny irregular sulcus 
close to the inner margin. Anal sternite with apex truncate. Sternites 
with a transverse groove behind the middle. Legs elongate; the 
ventral surface of the second joint is fleshy, appearing generally exca- 
vated, and the fifth joint is provided with an angularly produced pad, 
both structures being found on almost all the legs. 

The legs of the first pair are not unlike those of lysiopetalinus 
(Fig. 55). The basal joint is a very short ring, curiously excised 
posteriorly (C), provided with a short tracheal stalk; outwardly a small 
rounded plate is seen (.S), admitted to be all that is left of the sternite, 
the first joint thus being a coxa. The second joint is still shorter and 
open externally. The remaining joints of the limb are fused into a 
short and stout cone, tipped with a hook coiled cephalad and divided 
on its posterior surface by two superficial transverse sulci, which do 
not extend on the opposite surface. Legs of the second pair with almost 
completely atrophied sternite; coxal joint subcylindrical, destitute of 
basal expansion. The following joints show no particular structures, 
the telopodite being merely shorter than in the ambulatory legs. Penis 
small, parallel sided on most of its length, apically divided into a pair 
of abruptly sharpened cones. 

Peltogonopods (i. e., anterior pair of gonopods, Fig. 56) resembling 
those of lysiopetalinus. The very short sternal band (S) is fused with 
the long and flattened tracheal stalks (#). Coxal joint very long (C), 
gently tapering distally, its apex being pear-shaped and provided with 
two small hooks directed cephalad. The basal half of its inner edge 
bears an inconspicuous, short and blunt, retroflexed projection. Apical 
joint (7) as long as the coxa, fastened to the lateral edge of the latter 
in a manner that its basal, narrowed end almost reaches the sternal 
plate, while its distal end exceeds the summit of the coxa by less than 
one-fourth of its own length. The distal end is shallowly depressed 
cephalad, with acute outer angle, and is provided with two conspicuous 
processes, an anterior very long and slender, stake-like process, the 
sharpened end of which is directed proximally, and an inner erected, 
slightly curved spine, expanded and toothed in the middle of its length. 

Sternite of gonopods (S, Fig. 57) crescent-shaped, with a narrow 
median, erected rod thrust between the limbs. The latter are 
rectangular lamelle, three times as long as broad. Above the very 
thick base, the anterior surface is abruptly and deeply excavated, and 
the outer margin is slightly notched, owing to the fact that the 
distal part of the margin lies over the proximal part instead of standing 
in a line with it. Such structures bearing evidence to the former 
existence of a joint, the proximal thickened region (C) has to be looked 
upon as a coxal ring, while the upper flattened region (7) is equivalent 
to a telopodite. The latter end with a shallow depression, the outer 
angle being rounded and the inner bearing two short, erected processes, 
an anterior hooked and an inner spined process. The presence of a 
seminal groove could not be ascertained. 

The female structures have been described above. The larval 
stages are unknown. 


300 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


The systematic position of the genus Peromopus has long 
remained doubtful. Its features are so special that Bollman has 
been led to create for it the family P@romopide, in which 
Karsch’s genus stood alone. But the question of its affinities 
was not solved thereby. Silvestri, after having left the point 
undecided, 1896', finally, 1898, admits Bollman’s family 
Peromopide amongst his Iuloidea. So likewise does Pocock? 
who denies it a relationship with the Blaniulide and the Iso- 
batide. Attems, in his arrangement of the so-called ‘ Protoiu- 
lide,’’ does not mention Karsch’s genus’. 


That Peromopus has to take place in the Paraiulidi phylum, 
will certainly not be contested; yet it has still to be decided if 
it has to stand with the Paraiulide or with the Blaniulide’. 

If considered separately, the male genitalia supply no pos- 
itive criterium. However, since the vulve are somewhat better 
known, it seems that a clue may be obtained from their struc- 
ture. It has been mentioned that the vulve of Peromopus, 
provided as they are with a shield, are of a type not usually 
met with amongst Iuloidea. In fact the only species in which 
a similar structure has been as yet observed, is Mesoblaniulus 
serrula (Brol.), a tiny cave-dweller of the French Mediterranean 
coast, originally ascribed to Blaniulus. In a paper actually 
submitted to press’, an abstract of which® appeared recently, 
the author has altered his first opinion mostly on account of the 
conditions of the vulve; consequently it has been brought to 
rank amongst the Isobatine. An identical reason will therefore 
justify an attempt to enclose Peromopus in the same group, in 
which a new Tribe—Peremopini—will have to be created for 
its reception. No objection against such a conclusion can be 
derived from the male genitalia of Peromopus, as these show 
the structure constantly found existing in Jsobatine, 1. e., the 
preservation in the gonopods of a distinct coxal region, which is 
missing in Blaniuline. 


1Silvestri, 1896, Ann. Mus. Civ. Stor. Nat. Genova, (ser. 2) XVI, 26, III, 1896, 
and 1898, Ibid, (ser. 2) XVIIT, 29 XII, 1897. 


2Pocock, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., (7) XII, No. 71, Nov. 1903, p. 527. 

3Attems, Arkiv. for Zool., Stockholm, 1909, V, No. 3. 

4According to the author’s system, the Blaniulide are divided into two sub- 
families, Blaniuline and Isobatine. 

5This paper was ended during the spring, 1921, but could not be issued owing 
to the adverse conditions. 

6Arch. Zool. exper. gen., LX, Notes et Revue, No. 1, 1921. 


1922] Brolemann: Female Paraiulids 301 


Of course the point under discussion will have to be re- 
examined when the American Isobatine and the Asiatic fauna 
will have become better known. Amongst the Japanese Diplo- 
pods already recorded is Attems’ genus Karteroiulus, the male 
of which has the fourth segment open, whereas it is fused with 
the corresponding sternite in the female. But judging from the 
rough outline published by Attems (I. c., Pl. 2, Fig. 34), the 
vulve seem more closely related to those of the impressus 
group, as the ‘‘auf der Oralseite aufgeschlitzen Chitinring”’ 
probably answers halves of the synoperculum described in the 
preceding pages. Nothing is known of the female Kopidoiulus 
Att., the male of which is said to have the fourth segment open, 
as in Karteroiulus. | 


EXPLANATION OF ABBREVIATIONS USED 


a=Apodematic gutter of Mound. 

b=Hood of operculum. 

C=Coxite. 

d= Diverticulum of Vulve. 

G=Gula. 

H=Heart-shaped projection of oper- 
culum or synoperculum. 

h=Horse-shoe plate or thickening of 
Mound. 

4=Intermentum. 

iv=Inner valve of Mound. 

l=Ventral lobes of segments. 

M=Mound of vulve. 

O=Operculum of vulve. 


o=oviduct. 

ov=outer valve of Mound. 

P2, P3=Second, third pairs of limbs. 
p= Postmentum. 

R=Stipes of gnathochilarium. 
r=Ridge of Mound. 
S=Sternite. 

s=Shield of Vulve. 
T=Telopodite of limbs. 

T= Tracheal stalks. 

u=Ventral dimp!es of segments. 
v=Valves of Mound. 
W=Vulve. 

Y=Synoperculum of Vulve. 


302 


Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 


Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 


Fig. 


Fig. 
Fig. 


Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 


Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 


Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 


Fig. 


Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 


Fig. 


Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 


SS 


Se SES 


© 90 


Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 
EXPLANATION OF PLATES.* 


PLATE XIX. 


Paeromopus lysiopetalinus. Right mandibula, ventral aspect. 

Paeromopus lysiopetalinus. First pair of limbs, cephalic aspect. 

Paeromopus lysiopetalinus. Second pair of legs, vestibulum (V), and 
right vulvar invagination (J), caudal aspect. 1-5=Folds of aperture 
of vestibulum. 

Paeromopus lysiopetalinus. Weft vulva, caudal aspect. 

Paeromopus lysiopelalinus. Left vulva, outer profile. 

Paeromopus Chamberlint. Cardo and stipe of left mandibula, ventral 
aspect. 

Paeromopus Chamberlini. Coxe of second pair of legs of adult female, 
caudal aspect. y=paramesal projection of coxe; 1-5= folds of 
aperture of vestibulum. 

Paeromopus Chamberlini. Right adult vulva, caudal aspect. 

Paeromopus Chamberlini. Mound and shield of right adult vulva, 
oblique caudal aspect. 


PLATE XX. 


Paraiulus tiganus. Anterior end of adult female. 

Paraiulus tiganus. Ventral aspect of segments 1-3 of same. 

Paraiulus tiganus. Cephalic aspect of second segment (A) and ventral 
region of third (B). m=ventral ridge, and u=ventral dimple of 
2d segment. 

Paraiulus tiganus. Cardo and stipe of left mandibula, ventral aspect. 

Paraiulus tiganus. Legs of second pair of adult female, cephalic aspect. 

Paraiulus tiganus. Mound of left adult vulva, outer aspect. O=mem- 
branous fold replacing the operculum. 

Paraiulus tiganus. Left vulva from above. O=membranous fold 
replacing the operculum. 

Paraiulus tiganus. Anterior truncation of left vulva, the opercular 
fold of which has been removed. 

Paraiulus tiganus. Left vulva of another adult female, outer aspect, 
showing individual variations in the diverticulum, d. 


PLATE X XI. 


Paraiulus tiganus. Legs of second pair of larva and immature vulve, 
caudal aspect. 

Paraiulus tiganus. Base of legs of second pair of larva, cephalic aspect. 

Paraiulus tiganus. Immature vuive of Fig. 19, enlarged. 

Paraiulus pennsylvanicus. Anterior end of adult female. 

Paraiulus pennsylvanicus. Ventral aspect of segments 1-3 of same. 

Paraiulus pennsylvanicus. Cardo and stipe of left mandibula, ventral 
aspect. 

Parawulus pennsylvanicus. Cephalic aspect of ventral region of second 
segment (A) and of third (B). x=membrane connecting the ventral 
margins of 38d segment and bearing the atrophied sternite of 2d 
legs, P2. 

Paraiulus pennsylvanicus. Right adult vulva, inner profile. 

Paraiulus pennsylvanicus. Right adult vulva, caudal aspect. 

Paraiulus immaculatus. Anterior end of adult female. 

Paraiulus immaculatus. Ventral aspect of segments 1-3 of same. 
P2=chitinised bridge with symmetrical thickenings homologous 
to sternite of second pair of legs. 


*Camera drawings from the author. 


1922] 


Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 


Fig. 
Fig. 


Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 


Fig. 
Fig. 


Fig. 
Fig. 


Fig. 
Fig. 


Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 


Fig. 
Fig. 


Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 


Fig. 
Fig. 


Brolemann: Female Paraiulids 303 


PLATE XXII. 


Paraiulus immaculatus. Cardo and stipe of right mandibula, ventral 
aspect. 

Paraiulus immaculatus. Cephalic aspect of ventral region of second 
segment (A) and of third (B). P2=atrophied sternite of second 
legs. 

Paraiulus immaculatus. Adult vulve, caudal aspect. 

Paraiulus immaculatus. Right vulva, outer profile. 

Parautlus immaculatus. Inner oblique view on the anterior truncation 
of left vulva, the operculum of which has been partly detached and 
turned aside. 

Paraiulus impressus. Anterior end of adult female. 

Paraiulus tmpressus. Ventral aspect of segments 1-3 of same. 
S4=sternite of 4th segment. 

Paraiulus impressus. Cephalic aspect of ventral region of second 
segment (A) and of fourth (B). S4=sternite of 4th segment. 

Paraiulus impressus. Gnathochilarium of adult female. 


PLATE XXIII. 


Paraiulus impressus. Synoperculum and dwarfed legs of second pair, 
cephalic aspect. 

Paraiulus impressus. Both vulva, caudal aspect. The left mound 
is bent backwards and is seen from above. c=crest of the inner 
valve of the mound, and w=furrow of the outer valve. e=basal 
excavation of the synoperculum. 

Paraiulus impressus. Mound of left vulva, inner profile. c=crest of 
the inner valve. 

Paraiulus impressus. Base of legs of second pair of larva with immature 
vulvez, caudal aspect. 

Paraiulus venustus. Anterior end of adult female. 

Paraiulus venustus. Ventral aspect of segments 1-3. S4=sternite of 
fourth segment. 

Paraiulus venustus. Cephalic aspect of ventral region of second seg- 
ment (A) and of fourth (B). S4=sternite of fourth segment. 

Paraiulus venustus. Synoperculum and dwarfed legs of second pair, 
cephalic aspect. O=oviduct. ¥ 

Paraiulus venustus. Both vulve, caudal aspect.x=hardened area in the 
membrane of the vestibulum. 


PLATE XXIV. 


Paraiulus venustus. Mound of the right vulva, outer profile. 
Paraiulus venustus. Mound of the right vulva, anterior truncation 
(cephalic aspect). , 
Paraiulus venustus. Base of legs of second pair of larva with immature 

vulve, caudal aspect. 
Paraiulus ellipticus. Synoperculum and right mound. (M), oblique 
caudal aspect. The left mound has been removed to show the plow- 
~share-like process of the synoperculum, x. 
Paraiulus ellipticus. The left mound, outer profile. 
Paeromopus Chamberlini. Cardo and stipe of male left mandibula, 
ventral aspect. 
Paeromopus Chamberlini. Ventral aspect of segments 1-3 (under 
contraction). 
Paeromepus Chamberlini. Left leg of first pair of male. A =cephalic 
aspect; B=caudal aspect. 3 
Paeromopus Chamberlint. Right half of peltogonopods, cephalic aspect. 
Paeromopus Chamberlini. Left half of gonopods, cephalic aspect. 


ANNALS E. S. A. VoL. XV, PLATE XIX. 


Henry W. Brolemann 


ANNALS E. S. A. VoL. XV, PLATE XX. 


Henry W. Brolemann 


Annals E. S. A. VoL. XV, PLATE XXI1. 


Henry W. Brolemann 


Annats E. S. A. VoL. XV, Pirate XXII. 


Henry W. Brolemann 


VoL. XV, Pirate XXIII. 


ANNALS E. S. A. 


Henry W. Brolemann 


ANNALS E. S. A. VoL. XV, PLatE XXIV. 


Henry W. Brolemann 


HEAD AND MOUTH-PARTS OF MECOPTERA. 


FAUSTINO Q. OTANES, 
Bureau of Agriculture, Manila, Philippine Islands. 


INTRODUCTION. 


Our knowledge of the head and mouth-parts of the 
Mecoptera is fragmentary. Nothing comprehensive has been 
published dealing with the study of a collection of genera and 
species representative of the entire order. It was with the object 
of contributing to our knowledge of the morphology of the head 
and mouth-parts of the Mecoptera and to invite further inves- 
tigation on the subject that this study was undertaken. 

In order to make the work as comprehensive as possible, an 
attempt was made to study as many species as could be 
obtained, representing the different genera. Comstock, in his 
Manual for the Study of Insects, recognizes only one family of 
Mecoptera, the family Panorpide. In his paper on the Panor- 
pide of America North of Mexico, Hine (1901) listed five 
genera, namely: Merope, Boreus, Panorpodes, Panorpa and 
Bittacus, dividing these into two groups, those with ocelli in 
one group and those without in the other. Merope and Boreus 
were placed in the first group and Panorpodes, Panorpa and 
Bittacus in the second. In a recent monograph of the Mecoptera, 
Esben-Petersen (1921) lists five families, namely: Bittacide, 
Boreide, Panorpide, Natiothaumide and Meropide. I have 
been able to study all of the genera listed by Hine. This com- 
prises all of the families in Petersen’s monograph with the 
exception of one, the family Natiothaumide, which like the 
family Meropide, includes only one species (Natiothauma reed 
MacLachlan) and this is known to exist only in Chile and is 
very rare. 

This study was carried on under the direction of Dr. Alex. 
D. MacGillivray, of the University of Illinois, and to him I am 
indebted for his constant encouragement and valuable sugges- 
tions and criticisms throughout the progress of this work. I 
am also indebted to Dr. MacGillivray for his efforts in securing 


Contributions from the Entomological Laboratories of the University of 
Illinois, No. 70. 


310 


1922] Otanes: Head and Mouth-Parts of Mecoptera oll 


specimens not obtainable locally, and I also wish to express my 
thanks to the following gentlemen who very kindly donated 
specimens: Dr. J. Chester Brodley, of Cornell University, for 
Boreus nivoriundus; Professor Arthur L. Lovett, of the Oregon 
Agricultural College, for Panorpodes oregonensis; Professor 
Franklin Sherman, Jr., of Raleigh, North Carolina, for Panor- 
podes carolinensis; and Mr. Nathan Banks, of the Museum of 
Comparative Zoology, for specimens of A pterobitiacus apterus 
and Merope tuber. My thanks are also due to Professor S. A. 
Forbes and Dr. C. P. Alexander for specimens of Bitiacus stri- 
gosus from the collections of the Illinois State Natural History 
Survey and lastly to Dr. J. W. Folsom, for specimens of Boreus 
nivoriundus, sent to him by Mr. Chas. Macnamara, of Arnprior, 
Ontario, Canada, and for certain references. I wish also to 
acknowledge the permission given by Dr. MacGillivray to use 
his terminology, which will be embodied in a book on insect 
morphology soon to be published. 


METHODS. 


The specimens of the head of the different species were 
treated for a few minutes with a five per cent solution of hot 
potassium hydroxide. Before being examined they were 
washed with distilled water and then transferred to 70% 
alcohol. All dissections and examination were made in alcohol 
under a binocular microscope. Parts with minute details were 
mounted temporatily on slides and studied under a compound 
microscope. An ocular eyepiece micrometer ruled in squares 
proved helpful in getting the proportions for the drawings. 


FIXED PARTS OF THE HEAD. 


The order Mecoptera is referred to by taxonomists as having the 
head prolonged into a trunk-like beak at the end of which are located 
the biting mouth-parts. An examination of the head of the various 
species studied shows that Panorpodes (Figs. 1, 17, 27) does not conform 
to this characterization of the order. It is very much orthopteran 
in form and is the most generalized of all the genera studied and has 
been taken as the type. Panorpa (Figs. 10, 24, 31) and Boreus (Figs. 
14, 26, 32) are the only genera that possess a trunk-like beak and are 
the most specialized, Boreus being more so than Panorpa. Bittacus 
(Figs. 3, 19, 28), Aptero-bittacus (Figs. 5, 23, 29) and Merope (Figs. 
7, 25, 30) are intermediate in form. It should be mentioned, however, 
that specialization is not monopolized by either Boreus or Panorpa. 
Merope, for example, is without ocelli and in this respect is more highly 
specialized than either Boreus or Panor pa. 


312 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol Sevi 


The epicranial suture is undoubtedly the most important landmark 
on the head capsule of insects. In a discussion of the sclerites of the 
head, therefore, it is logical to begin with this suture. This suture 
is the inverted Y-shaped median stricture found in nymphs, larve and 
generalized adult insects. It marks the line of closure of the head 
during embryonic development. Originating at the occipital foramen, 
it extends along the dorso-meson for some distance and gives rise to 
‘two branches known as the epicranial arms. Each arm extends toward 
a compound eye in generalized adult insects and to the cephalic margin 
of the head in the case of larvee. The stem of the epicranial suture, 
designated as the epicranial stem, is obsolete in all the species of 
Mecoptera studied. In a hypothetical type of the mecopterous head, 
the epicranial stem, as in generalized insects, originates from the 
occipital foramen and extends cephalad and ventrad along the meson 
and is interrupted at some point by the median ocellus. Emerging, 
still as a single suture from the ventral margin of the median ocellus, 
the epicranial stem extends ventrad of the antennariz, where it divides 
into the epicranial arms, each arm extending laterad to a pretentorina 
and then ventrad, terminating in a precoila. In Panorpodes (Fig. 1), 
the epicranial arms (ea) are only partially present and the portion of 
each arm extending from a pretentorina (pn) to a precoila (pr) is 
obsolete. In Bittacus (Fig. 3), the entire epicranial arms are present 
and in this respect Bittacus is more generalized than Panorpodes. In 
A pterobittacus (Fig. 5), the transverse portion of the arms connecting 
the pretentorinze has disappeared. In Merope (Fig. 7), the entire 
epicranial suture is obsolete. In Panorpa (Fig. 10), on the other 
hand, a portion of the arms is present and 1s, therefore, in this particular 
more generalized than Merope. In Boreus (Fig. 14), the same con- 
dition as in Merope obtains, the complete obsolescence of the epicranial 
suture. 

The vertex (V, Figs. 1, 6, 14, 16, 19, 27, 28) extends from near 
the occipital foramen (of, Figs. 16, 19, 22) and ventrad to the sutures 
marking the boundary of the sclerites of the ventral portion of the head. 
In generalized insects, as the cockroach, the vertex is a paired sclerite, 
being divided along the meson by the epicranial stem. The vertex 
in the Mecoptera is a solid piece, not a paired sclerite, on account of 
the obsolescence of the epicranial stem. It bears, besides the com- 
pound eyes, the ocelli and the antennz (a). Each lateral portion of 
the vertex is greatly prolonged ventrad in Boreus and Panorpa. ‘There 
is a tooth-like lateral projection of the vertex in Buittacus, A ptero- 
bittacus, Merope and Panorpodes which is especially prominent in 
the species of the last named genus. This projection seems to be 
wanting in Panorpa and Boreus, but its homologue can be identified 
in these last two genera. 

The fronto-clypeus (fc), formed by a fusion of the front and clypeus 
through the obsolescence of the fronto-clypeal suture, is, roughly 
speaking, subquadrate in Panorpodes (Fig. 1), Bittacus (Fig. 3), A ptero- 
bittacus (Fig. 5), and Merope (Fig. 6), and rectangular and greatly 
elongated in Panorpa (Fig. 10) and Boreus (Fig. 14). It is in general 


1922] Otanes: Head and Mouth-Parts of Mecoptera 813 


setiferous and is fused with the labrum (1) in all the species studied. 
Its ventral extent, however, is marked by the position of the precoile 
(pr). In Merope and Boreus, the fronto-clypeus has completely merged 
with the vertex owing to the obsolescence of the entire epicranial 
suture; in Bittacus, the fronto-clypeus is wholly separated from the 
vertex by the epicranial arms, and in A pterobittacus, the fronto-clypeus 
is fused with the vertex along its dorsal margin owing to the obsolescence 
of the transverse portion of the epicranial arms, whereas in Panorpodes 
it is fused with the vertex along its lateral margins, brought about by 
the disappearance of the lateral parts of the epicranial arms. 

There is a pair of membranous areas dorsad of the fronto-clypeus 
which connect the antenne and the head (Fig. 1). These are the 
antacorize (an) and are located on the vertex in the Mecoptera. The 
size of the antacoriz in the Mecoptera varies considerably, being smallest 
in Bittacus and most pronounced in Panorpodes. Surrounding each 
antacoria is a narrow, ring-like sclerite known as the antennaria (ar). 
There is a cuticular projection into the antacoria from the ventro- 
lateral portion of the antennaria, which is somewhat prominent in 
Panorpa (Fig. 31) and Boreus (Figs. 14, 32), designated as the antacoila 
(aa). Yuasa (1920) referred to the antacoila as being the ‘‘chitinized 
pin” in the cockroach, as described by Miall and Denny. 


The compound eyes (ce), regarded as the appendages of the first, 
ocular or protocerebral segment are of considerable size in the Mecoptera 
and are especially prominent in Bittacus (Figs. 3, 28) in proportion to- 
the size of the head. Viewed from the lateral aspect, the compound 
eyes are oval except in Merope (Figs. 7, 30), where they are oblong 
and emarginate on the cephalic margin, giving them a distinctly 
reniform shape, thus resembling the eyes of some Hymenoptera, as 
Vespa maculata. In Bittacus the eyes are slightly emarginate on the 
caudal margin, the reverse of Merope, giving the eyes also a kidney- 
shaped appearance. .Each compound eye is surrounded by a narrow 
ring-like area, which is prolonged entad as an annular strongly chitinized 
plate. This area is called the oculata (ol) and was designated by 
Comstock and Kochi (1902) as an ‘“‘ocular sclerite.’”? These authors 
considered the oculata as the proximal segment of an ocular appendage. 
Crampton (1921), however, is not inclined to consider the oculata as a 
sclerite, stating that this area is not marked off by a true suture and 
objects to the consideration of the oculata by Comstock and Kochi 
as being the basal segment of an ocular appendage. Yuasa (1920) 
observed the oculata as being always present in all the species of 
Orthoptera which he studied and as well developed in the species 
having large compound eyes, as Mantis religiosa and Melanoplus 
differentialis. Peterson (1916) likewise recognized the oculata in 
Diptera and calls it the ocular sclerite, using the term proposed by 
Comstock and Kochi. 

The normal number of ocelli is present in all of the genera studied, 
with the exception of Merope. They are more or less circular in outline 
and are most prominent in Bittacus and in A pterobittacus. They are 
located on the vertex as is true in all Entoptera. In Bittacus (Figs. 


314 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


3, 28) and in A pterobittacus (Figs. 5, 29), the lateral ocelli (lo) are 
situated distinctly dorsad of the compound eyes, whereas they are 
mesad of the latter in the other genera where they are present. The 
ocelli are located on convex areas in Panorpodes (Fig. 1) and Panorpa 
(Fig. 10) and are close to each other in Panorpa. The median ocellus 
(mo) in all cases is slightly smaller than either of the lateral ocelli. 

As stated previously, Hine (1901) divided the genera of the Pan- 
orpide into two groups, those with ocelli in one group and those without 
in another. Merope and Boreus were placed in the first group and 
Bittacus, Panorpa and Panorpodes in the other. In his monograph, 
as already referred to, Esben-Petersen (1921) divides the Mecoptera 
into five families, giving as one of the characteristics of the family 
Boreide to which Boreus belongs, the absence of ocelli. I found the 
normal number of ocelli present in the species of Boreus that I studied. 
The ocelli, however, were small and overshadowed by the black color 
and shiny appearance of the head, black with a bluish tinge. This is 
probably the reason why the ocelli in Boreus have been overlooked 
by previous workers. A few minutes’ treatment of the head with a 
five per cent solution of potassium hydroxide will reveal the ocelli as 
circular, white opaque bodies. Each lateral ocellus is located near 
the dorso-mesal margin of a compound eye and the median ocellus 
between the antacoriz (an). Judged from the location of the ocelli, 
Boreus is more specialized than any of the other genera. 

There is a pair of depressions on the cephalic aspect of the head 
ventro-mesad of the compound eyes. These depressions are known as 
the pretentorine (pn), which mark the point of invagination of the 
pretentoria (pt, Figs. 37, 38, 39, 40). In Panorpodes, Panorpa and 
Boreus, the pretentorine are situated directly ventrad of the antacoriz 
(an), while they are distant from the latter in Bittacus, A pterobittacus 
and Merope; they are, in these last three genera, near the ventro-mesal 
margin of the compound eyes and distinctly more so in Bittacus where 
they nearly touch the margin of the eyes. 


In specialized insects, the pretentorinze are not fixed in location. 
They may migrate away from the precoile (pr) but are usually located 
on or near the epicranial arms. In the Orthoptera, the pretentorinz 
are located immediately dorsad of each precoile and are apparently 
distant from the epicranial arms. In the Mecoptera, they are isolated 
from the precoile and are markedly so in Panorpa and Boreus, owing 
to the great elongation of the fronto-clypeus. ; 

The precoile (pr) in which the mandibles are articulated on the 
cephalic aspect are distinct in the Mecoptera. Each precoila is located 
at the ventro-lateral angle of the fronto-clypeus. In generalized 
insects, each precoila is situated at the caudo-lateral or dorso-lateral 
angle of the clypeus, depending upon the direction of the mouth-parts. 
In the honey-bee and other Hymenoptera, the precoile are similarly 
situated as in the Mecoptera. The clypeo-labral suture is obsolete 
in the Mecoptera studied. 

The labrum (1) of Panorpodes (Fig. 1) is of considerable size, seti- 
ferous, narrower at tip, and each lateral margin is slightly emarginate. 


1922] Otanes: Head and Mouth-Parts of Mecoptera 31D 


The ventral margin is distinctly emarginate. That of Bittacus (Fig. 3) 
is elongated, narrows gradually ventrad and is slightly rounded at the 
apex. Its ventral half is fringed along the lateral margin with sete, 
those toward the apex being rather prominent. The dorsal half of 
the lateral margin is thin and folded mesad (Fig. 52). The ventral 
portion of each lateral fold is also fringed with rather small sete. The 
labrum of 4A pterobittacus (Fig. 5) is very similar to that of Bzttacus. 
That of Panorpa (Fig. 10) is reduced on account of the great elongation 
of the fronto-clypeus. It is chordate in shape and its apical margin 
is emarginate. Each lateral margin is fringed with sete, which are 
more prominent and are present in larger numbers than in Bittacus. 
Boreus (Fig. 14) has likewise a reduced labrum, which is rounded, 
fleshy and densely setiferous at the apical margin. The sete of the 
distal margin are minute. The labrum of Merope (Fig. 7) has a bluntly 
pointed apex and its free margins are densely fringed with rather long 
setee. The cephalic surface is also clothed with short sete, an oblique 
row of such sete being recognizable along each side of the meson. 

In all the genera studied, the occipital foramen (of, Figs. 17, 19, 22), 
24, 25, 26) is of considerable size and is divided into two parts by a 
strongly chitinized bridge designated as the corpotentorium (ct), 
or body of the tentorium. The dorsal or upper portion of the occipital 
foramen is larger than the ventral, with the exception of Bittacus, 
where they are almost of the same size. At each ventro-lateral margin 
of the dorsal portion of the occipital foramen is a strongly chitinized 
triangular projection known as an odontoidea (od), which serves as a 
point of articulation for a cervepisternum (ccs), a chitinized lateral 
sclerite of the cervix or neck which connects the head and the thorax. 
The membrane connecting the neck and the head is the cervicoria (cc). 
The odontoidee are more prominent in Panorpa and Panorpodes 
than in Bittacus, Apterobittacus and Boreus. They can hardly be 
identified in Merope. 

That part of the head adjacent to the occipital foramen and dorsad 
of the odontoideze is known as the occiput (oc). In some insects, as 
in the grasshopper (Melanoplus differentialis) the occiput can be 
differentiated because of the partial presence of the occipital suture. 
It is divided along the meson by the epicranial stem. In all the mecop- 
terous insects studied, the occiput is merged with the vertex owing to 
the obsolescence of the occipital suture. 

In the Orthoptera, as in the grasshopper, there are two distinct 
sclerites, known as the postgenze (pa), ventrad of the occiput, one on 
each side of the occipital foramen. In the same insect, there is a trans- 
verse suture which separates the occiput and a postgena. T he suture 
in question is designated as the occipito-postgenal suture. In the 
mecopterous heads studied, the postgene are continuous with the vertex 
and occiput. In the absence of the occipito-postgenal suture, the 
odontoideee may be used as landmarks in determining the point of 
division between the occiput and each postgena. In all the species 
treated in this paper, the postgenz are of considerable size and in 
Boreus and Panorpa, they are prolonged ventrad as a narrow area. 


316 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol.-XV, 


At the apical margin of each postgena is a distinet acetabulum, a coila, 
known as a postcoila (ptl) in which the caudo-proximal portion of each 
mandible is articulated. The postgenz in all the species of Mecoptera 
studied extend mesad and fuse on the meson, forming a bridge, known 
as the genaponta (gn), which limits the ventral extent of the occipital 
foramen. The genaponta in Boreus (Fig. 26) is a large area, whereas 
it is very narrow in the other genera. 

In Blatta and other Orthoptera, the tentorium consists of the 
following parts: metatentoria, carpotentorium, pretentoria, lami- 
natentorium and supratentoria. The tentorium in the Mecoptera 
(Figs. 37, 38, 39, 40) is not as well developed as in the Orthoptera. 
All of the typical parts of the tentortum mentioned above, except the 
laminatentorium, are present in the Mecoptera. The metatentoria 
(mt) support the lateral margins of the occipital foramen and are pro- 
longed mesad, fusing into a strongly chitinized bridge known as the 
carpotentorium (ct) or body of the tentorium, and which, as has been 
stated previously, divides the occipital foramen into two portions. 
The points where the metatentoria are invaginated are the metaten- 
torine (mn); as a rule they are not very distinct in the species of 
Mecoptera studied. The pretentoria (pt) or anterior arms of the 
tentorium connect the caudal and the cephalic aspects of the head. 
The places of invagination of the pretentoria are the pretentorinze (pn), 
which have been described elsewhere. Arising from each pretentorium 
and connecting the latter with the ental portion of each lateral margin 
of an antennaria is a supratentorium (st). The supratentorium are 
best developed in Bittacus and A pterobittacus and are hardly dis- 
tinguishable in Panorpa and Panorpodes where they are thread-like. 


MOVABLE PARTS OF THE HEAD. 


The antennz are usually long, setiferous and multiarticulated in’ 
the Mecoptera. The antenna of Boreus (Fig. 35) is filiform and consists 
of twenty-three segments. Those of Panorpodes and Panor pa, like those 
of Boreus, are filiform and consist of a larger number of segments. 
Bittacus (Fig. 33) has a setaceous antenna consisting of about twenty 
segments. The antenne of Merope (Fig. 34) are very different, monili- 
form, there being twenty-nine segments. 

The mandibles of all the species studied are decussating. Those 
of Panorpodes oregonensis (Figs. 20, 21) are triangular and are provided 
with two distadentes (dd), the distal one being more prominent. The 
mesal margin is irregularly serrated. The mandibles of Panorpodes 
carolenensis (Figs. 15, 28) differ somewhat in shape and the distadentes 
are not as prominent. The mesal serration is more regular than that 
of oregonensis. Those of Merope (Figs. 9, 18), Panorpa (Figs. 11, 12), 
and Boreus (Figs. 4, 11) do not differ very much in shape from those 
of the two species of Panorpodes. Unlike those of Panorpodes, they are 
not serrated along the mesal margins. The mandibles of Merope and 
Panorpa are each provided with three distadentes, the lateral one being 
the most prominent and is especially well developed in Merope, and the 
mesal tooth the smallest. Hine (1901) gave as one of the characteristics 


1922] Otanes: Head and Mouth-Parts of Mecoptera 317 


of the genus Panorpa the two-toothed condition of the mandibles. 
Examination of the mandibles of Panorpa americana and Panorpa 
lugubris shows that they are distinctly three-toothed. The mandibles 
of Merope are slightly emarginate at the middle of the mesal margin. 
Those of Boreus are six-toothed, the teeth decreasing in size toward 
the proximal portion of the mandible. Bittacus (Figs. 2, 8) has a 
distinctly different type of mandibles. They are greatly elongated, 
sword-shaped, and end in a prominent distadentis. There is also a 
rudimentary mesal tooth. At the meso-proximal portion of each 
mandible, there is present a conical projection, the function of which 
is not clear. Hine (1898), in his paper on the genus Bittacus failed 
to notice this, as may be judged from his descriptions and figures. 
The mandibles of A pterobittacus (Figs. 6, 16) are very much like those 
of Bittacus. In all the mandibles of the Mecoptera here considered, 
there is a prominent swelling on the caudo-proximal portion, a condyle, 
known as the postartis (pte), which articulates in a distinct acetabulum 
of the postgena, the postcoila (ptl, Figs. 50, 52, 59). Each mandible 
articulates on its cephalic aspect to the precoila of the clypeus by means 
of another condyle known as the preartis (py). The tendons, to which 
the muscles of the head are attached, controlling the movement of the 
mandibles, are well developed. The lateral tendon, which is the 
smaller of the two, and to which the extensor muscles are attached, 
is known as the extensotendon (et), and the mesal tendon, to which 
the retractor muscles are attached, is called the rectotendon (rt). 


The maxille are well developed in the Mecoptera. The maxille 
of Panorpodes oregonensis (Fig. 49) and P. carolenesis (Fig. 45) are 
very similar and they represent the most generalized condition of all 
the species examined. The maxilla of Boreus are the most specialized 
owing to the fact that they are completely fused with the labium. 
The cardo (ca) in all the species is undivided and is strongly chitinized. 
In both species of Panorpodes, the cardo is triangular and with a few 
prominent set at ventro-lateral angle. It is also triangular in Panorpa 
and is provided with a few small sete, whereas it is subquadrate in 
Bittacus (Fig. 41) and A pterobittacus (Fig. 44) and the sete, as in 
Panorpodes, are prominent. The two cardines in Merope (Fig. 46) are 
club-like in outline and there is in each cardo a prominent projection 
on its ventro-mesal margin. The cardines in Boreus (Fig. 36) are fused 
and together with a part of the submentum form a somewhat elliptical 
plate. The stipes (s) is also strongly chitinized, generally club-shaped; 
in Panorpodes, Bittacus, A pterobittacus and Panorpa and with prom- 
inent sete. As has been already stated, the maxilla of Boreus are 
fused with the labium so that it is impossible to ascertain the mesal 
extent of the stipes. The stipes (s) in Merope (Figs. 46, 47) are broad 
and fused at the proximal end. There are two prominent lobes distad 
of the stipes in all the species. The outer or lateral lobe has been 
designated by other workers, among whom are Hine, Miyake and 
Crampton, as the galea and the inner or mesal lobe as the lacinia. 
In nearly all the species studied, the so-called lacinia is always the 
larger and the better developed of the two lobes, which is an anomaly, 


318 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol.. XV, 


considering the condition existing in other specialized insects. By 
virtue of the position of the lobes, these designations are logical, the 
part adjacent to the maxillary palpus is always the galea. In highly 
specialized insects, as the Diptera, the lacinia is in nearly all cases 
wanting and where it is present, as in Simulium and Tabanus, as 
Peterson has shown, it is greatly reduced and the question may be raised 
as to whether this is even the lacinia. In most Hymenoptera, the 
lacinia is greatly reduced and in certain cases, as MacGillivray has 
shown, the lacinia may be absent. He has also shown that in many 
species of Hymenoptera, as Macroxyela infuscata, Dolerus unicolor, 
Ophion bilineatum and Vespa maculata, the galea is divided into two 
lobes. This divided condition of the galea is what probably obtains 
in the Mecoptera; the two lobes represent subdivisions of the galea 
while the lacinia has completely disappeared. The lobes of the galea 
(gl) in Panor podes oregonensis (Figs. 49, 58) are finger-like and setiferous 
and they are of about the same length. In Panorpodes carolinensis 
(Fig. 45) the outer lobe of the galea is distinctly shorter. In Bittacus 
(Figs. 41, 48) and A pterobittacus (Figs. 44, 53), the two lobes are greatly 
elongated, and the inner lobe is even longer than the stipes. In Merope 
(Figs. 46, 54), the two lobes have assumed the form of strongly chitinized 
triangular plates with dense brushes of rather long setae. The mesal 
margins of the lobes are thick, somewhat fleshy and with numerous 
minute sete. Figure 55 shows the lateral aspect of the two lobes in 
Merope. The brush presents a U-shaped appearance. In Panorpa 
(Figs. 42, 47) and Boreus (Figs. 36, 60), the lobes have been reduced 
in length owing to the greatly elongated stipes. In Panorpa they are 
of about the same size and are setiferous. In Boreus the inner lobe is 
fleshy, setiferous and provided with two rows of strong conical spines 
arranged diagonally at the proximal end. The outer lobe in Boreus is a 
triangular plate curved mesad. 


The maxillary palpus (mp) is five-segmented and setiferous in all 
the species. The palpifer (pf) is chitinous in Panorpa, membranous 
in Bittacus and A pterobittacus and slightly so in Boreus and continuous 
with the first or proximal segment of the maxillary palpus. In Panor- 
podes, the palpifer cannot be differentiated; it is probably merged with 
the stipes. The maxillary palpi of Boreus differ markedly from those 
of the other species studied in that the segments increase in diameter 
distad, the distal segment being not only the broadest but also the 
longest. 

The maxillz in general are not articulated to the paracoila of the 
head by a parartis. They are merely connected with the head by means 
of the maxacoriz (mc) which are distinct in all the species. 

The labium (li) consists typically of the following parts in gen- 
eralized insects: submentum, mentum, and ligula, the latter of which 
consists of the stipulee, glossee, paraglossee, palpigers and labial palpi. 
The mentum is in most cases small, completely fused with the stipulee 
and cannot be identified as a separate sclerite. In both species of 
Panorpodes (Figs. 45, 49), the area between the stipes and cardines is 
entirely membranous. This area comprises the submentum (sm) 


1922] Otanes: Head and Mouth-Parts of Mecoptera 319 


and the labicoriz (lc), the membranes which connect the maxille and 
the labium in all generalized insects where the submentum is a distinct 
sclerite. In Panorpa americana (Fig. 48), the submentum is membranous 
except the ventral portion, which is distinctly chitinized. This chitinized 
portion of the submentum was designated as the mentum by Crampton 
(1921) in his figure for Panorpa lugubris, not indicating, however, the 
submentum. I have also examined specimens of the labium, as well 
as other parts of the head, of Panorpa lugubris and have not found 
marked morphological differences between it and that of Panorpa 
americana. The labicorize of Panorpa americana, as in Panorpodes, 
are continuous with the submentum. In Bittacus (Fig. 19) and A ptero- 
bittacus (Fig. 44), the chitinized portion of the submentum (sm) is an 
elongate area, vase-like in outline and bears long, prominent sete. 
The ventral portion of this area was likewise designated by Crampton 
(1921) in his figure for Bittacus (species not indicated), as the mentum, 
labeling the dorsal portion of it as the submentum. Hine (1898) in 
his figure of the labium of Bittacus strigosus, showed the area between 
the stipes and cardines, considered as the submentum and labicoria in 
this paper, as if it were wholly setiferous and failed to indicate the 
chitinized area, which is rather distinct. Hine further considered 
the ligula as being absent. In Merope (Fig. 46), the submentum (sm) 
and labicorize have become strongly chitinized, except the portion 
between the cardines. In Boreus (Fig. 36), the area has become com- 
pletely chitinized and fused with the stipes. We have thus in the 
Mecoptera a modification of this area from a wholly membranous to 
a wholly chitinized condition and also a condition where the maxillze 
are distinctly differentiated from the labium in one case and another 
where they are distinctly continuous with it. 


There is a subquadrate area distad or ventrad of the submentum 
which consists of the fused stipule, palpigers, glossee and paraglosse. 
This area is here designated as the mecaglossa, because it is typical 
of the Mecoptera. The palpigers (pp) are represented in all the figures 
as occupying the distal portion of the mecaglossa and include the 
somewhat membranous areas at the proximal ends of the labial palpi. 
Crampton (1921) calls the mecaglossa in Panorpa lugubris the palpigers, 
although, he says, they may represent the basal segments of the labial 
palpi. In his figure of the labium of the same species, he shows a 
distinct suture between what he calls the palpigers. Besides Panorpa 
americana, I have also examined numerous specimens of the labrum of 
Panorpa lugubris and I was unable to find a suture dividing what he 
terms the palpigers. What appears to be a suture is a thickening 

‘formed by the fusion of the tendons which control the movement of 
the labial palpi. There is a depression along the region he indicates, 
but it is such a broad depression that it can not be called a suture. 

The mecaglossa is very different from the stipule, glosse and para- 
glossee of generalized insects where there is a palpiger attached to 
the lateral margin of each stipula. It is a greatly reduced area in the 
Mecoptera and the palpigers are distal in position. The obsolescence 
of the sutures separating the glossze and paraglossze from the stipulé and 


320 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


the marked reduction of the mecaglossa as a whole has misled most 
authors in considering the mecaglossa as the palpigers. 


The labial palpus (Ip) in all of the species is two-segmented. The 
first segment in most cases is broad and fleshy, especially in the case 
of Panorpa (Fig. 48). At the base of the first segment of the labial 
palpus of Panorpa there is a chitinized plate which Miyake called the 
“basal piece.”” In his figure of Bittacus, and it is unfortunate that he 
did not indicate the species, Crampton (1921) shows, besides empha- 
sizing it in the text, that each labial palpus is three-segmented. He 
makes some use of this condition in attempting to establish close 
relationship between the Neuroptera, Diptera and the Mecoptera. 
I have examined many specimens of the labium of Bittacus strigosus 
and found only two segments in the labial palpus. The distal segment 
is never divided as far as observed. Miyake figures two segments in 
Bittacus nipponicus and states for the Japanese Mecoptera as a whole: 
“The labial palpus is very conspicuous, consisting of two joints.” 
Can it be that within the same genus the number of segments in the 
labial palpus varies to this extent or has Crampton made an error? 
Even in widely different genera of Orthoptera, the number of segments 
in the labial palpus is constant; it is always three. My specimen of 
A pterobittacus also shows a two-segmented condition of the labial palpus 
and this was formerly placed within the genus Bittacus. 


The pharynx is defined as the portion of the alimentary canal 
extending from the occipital foramen to the mouth, the mouth being 
the opening surrounded by the mouth-parts. The pharynx has two 
main parts, a cephalic or ventral portion, depending on the position of 
the head, called the prepharynx, and a caudal or dorsal portion called 
the postpharynx (pox) which is always tubular. The prepharynx 
includes the epipharynx, hypopharynx and other parts. The size 
of the epipharynx (ex) varies with the size of the labrum, which in 
turn varies with the size and shape of the head. It is greatly reduced 
in Panorpa (Fig. 61) and Boreus, owing to the greatly elongated fronto- 
clypeus. The epipharynx (ex) in general has minute circular areas, 
which are most numerous in Panorpodes (Fig. 50). These circular areas 
are probably portions of taste organs, which Packard (1889) designated 
as the taste cups. They are also found on the labium and the maxille. 
In Panorpa (Fig. 61), there is an oblique row of minute sete: on each 
side of the meson and along each side of this row of sete there is a 
group of the circular areas that have been referred to previously. 
The epipharynx in Merope (Fig. 59) is densely clothed with very 
minute sete. 

The hypopharynx (hx) in the Mecoptera is well developed, except 
in Boreus, where it is somewhat reduced. In general it is tongue-like 
in appearance and ‘is setiferous. At the base of the hypopharynx, 
where it joins the labium, is located the opening of the salivary duct, 
called the salivos (so). The salivary duct can be easily identified 
in many of the species. It is very well developed in A pierobittacus 
(Fig. 53) and its striated condition is very apparent. 


1922] Otanes: Head and Mouth-Parts of Mecoptera $21 


SUMMARY. 


Of all the genera represented in this study, namely: Panor- 
podes, Bittacus, Apterobittacus, Merope, Panorpa and Boreus, 
the first one, Panorpodes, is the most generalized. The head is 
orthopteran in form and does not have a trunk-like beak. 
Boreus and Panorpa are the most specialized, Boreus being 
markedly more so than Panorpa. These genera are the only 
two that possess a distinctly trunk-like beak. 

The order Mecoptera is commonly characterized as having 
the head prolonged into a trunk-like beak at the end of which 
are located the biting mouth-parts. This characterization of 
the order is inaccurate and somewhat misleading. The term 
‘‘trunk-like beak’’ does not fit most of the genera and more- 
over, the only mouth-parts located at the end of the beak are 
the mandibles. 

Certain sclerites of the head and mouth-parts are given new 
interpretations. The portions of the labium which have been 
regarded as the palpigers by some authors are designated as 
the mecaglossa, because it is typical of the Mecoptera. It 
comprises the fused stipule, palpigers, glossee and paraglosse. 
The labial palpus is always two-segmented. The two lobes, 
commonly regarded as a galea and a lacinia, are here considered 
as subdivisions of the galea. 

The American species of Mecoptera offer no evidence con- 
firmatory of the opinion of Crampton and Tillyard that the 
glosse and paraglossee of Peterson in the Diptera are homol- 
ogous with the labial: palpi. 

The normal number of ocelli present is three. They are 
ordinarily large and subadjacent. The ocelli are wanting in 
Merope. Authors hitherto have described the ocelli as wanting 
in Boreus. I have found three small, distant inconspicuous 
ocelli in this genus. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


Comstock, J. H. and Kochi, C., 1902. The skeleton of the head of insects. Am. 
Nat., Vol. 36, pp. 13-45; 29 figs. 

Crampton, G. C., 1921. The sclerites of the head and mouth-parts of certain 
immature and adult insects. Ann. Ent. Soc. Am., Vol. 14, pp. 65-103; 
pls. 2-8. 

Esben-Petersen, P., 1921. Mecoptera. Monographic Revision. Collec. Zool. 
Selys Longchamps, Fasc. V, pt. 2, pp. 1-172; pls. 1-2. 


oo Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


Hine, J. S., 1898. The North American species of the genus Bittacus. Jour. 
Columbus Hort. Soc., Vol. 13, pp. 105-116; pls. 1-2. 
1901. A review of the Panorpide of America North of Mexico. Bull. 
Sci. Lab. Denison Univ., Vol. 11, pp. 241-264; pls. 59-61. 
MacGillivray, A. D., 1912. The lacinia in the maxilla of the Hymenoptera. Ann. 
Ent. Soc. Am., Vol. 5, pp. 231-237; pl. 18. 
Miyake, T., 1918. Studies on the Mecoptera of Japan. Jour. Coll. Agr., Imp. 
Univ., Tokyo, Vol. 4, pp. 265-400; pls. 18-37. 
Packard, A. S., 1889. On the occurrence of taste organs in the epipharynx of the 
Mecoptera. Psyche, Vol. 5, pp. 159-164. 
Peterson, A., 1916. The head-capsule and mouth-parts of Diptera. III. Biol. 
Monographs, Vol. 3, pp. 1-112; pls. 1-25. 
Yuasa, H., 1920. The anatomy of the head and mouth-parts of Orthoptera. 
Jour. Morphology, Vol. 33, pp. 251-307; pls. 1-9. 


LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS. 


a—antenna. 
aa—antacolla. 
af—antafossa. 
an—antacoria. 
ar—antennaria. 
ca—cardo. 
cc—cervicoria. 


ecs—cervepisternum. 


ce—compound eye. 
ct—corpotentorium. 
dd—distadentes. 
ea—epicranial arm. 
et—extensotendon. 
ex—epipharynx. 
fe—fronto-clypeus. 
fl—flagellum. 
hx—hypopharynx. 
gl—galea. 
gn—genaponta. 
1—labrum. 
le—labicoria. 
li—labium. 
lo—lateral ocellus. 
lp—labial palpus. 
mc—maxacoria. 
md—mandible. 
mg—mecaglossa. 


Beals 
Inns, 2h 
ie Be 
Fig. 4. 
lrg, 
Fig. 6. 
lage Te 
IEaMeey = fol 

9. 


mn—metatentorina. 
mo—median ocellus. 
mp—maxillary palpus. 
mt—metatentorium. 
oc—occiput. 
od—odontoidea. 
of—occipital foramen. 
ol—-oculata. 
p—pedicel. 
pa—postgena. 
pf—palpifer. 
pn—pretentorina. 
pox—postpharynx. 
pp—palpiger. 
pr—precoila. 
pt—pretentorium. 
ptc—postartis. 
pti—postcoila. 
py—preartis. 
rt—rectotendon. 
s—stipes. 

sc—scape. 
sld—salivary duct. 
sm—submentum. 
so—salivos. 
st—supratentorium. 
V—vertex. 


EXPLANATION OF PLATES. 


PLATE XXV. 


Panor podes oregonensis, cephalic aspect of head. 

Bittacus strigosus, cephalic aspect of sinistral mandible. 
Bittacus strigosus, cephalic aspect of head. 

Boreus nivoriundus, caudal aspect of sinistral mandible. 

A pterobittacus apterus, cephalic aspect of head. 

A pterobittacus apterus, cephalic aspect of sinistral mandible. 
Merope tuber, cephalic aspect of head. 

Bittacus strigosus, caudal aspect of sinistral mandible. 
Merope tuber, cephalic aspect of sinistral mandible. 


1922] Otanes: Head and Mouth-Parts of Mecoptera 320 


Fig. 10. Panorpa americana, cephalic aspect of head. 

Fig. 11. Boreus nivoriundus, cephalic aspect of sinistral mandible. 
Fig. 12. Panorpa americana, caudal aspect of sinistral mandible. 

Fig. 18. Panorpa americana, cephalic aspect of sinistral mandible. 
Fig. 14. Boreus nivoriundus, cephalic aspect of head. 

Fig. 15. Panorpodes carolinensis, cephalic aspect of sinistral mandible. 
Fig. 16. A pterobittacus apterus, caudal aspect of sinistral mandible. 
Fig. 17. Panorpodes oregonensis, caudal aspect of head. 

Fig. 18. Merope tuber, caudal aspect of sinistral mandible. 

Fig. 19. Bittacus strigosus, caudal aspect of head. 

Fig. 20. Panorpodes oregonensis, caudal aspect of sinistral mandible. 
Fig. 21. Panorpodes oregonensis, cephalic aspect of sinistral mandible. 
Fig. 22. A pterobittacus apterus, caudal aspect of head. 

Fig. 28. Panorpodes carolinensis, caudal aspect of sinistral mandible. 


PLATE XXVI. 


Fig. 24. Panorpa americana, caudal aspect of head. 
Fig. 25. Merope tuber, caudal aspect of head. 

Fig. 26. Boreus nivoriundus, caudal aspect of head. 
Fig. 27. Panorpodes oregonensts, lateral aspect of head. 
Fig. 28. Bittacus strigosus, lateral aspect of head. 

Fig. 29. A pterobittacus apterus, lateral aspect of head. 
Fig. 80. Merope tuber, lateral aspect of head. 

Fig. 31. Panorpa americana, lateral aspect of head. 
Fig. 32. Boreus nivoriundus, lateral aspect of head. 


PLATE XXVII. 


Fig. 33. Bittacus strigosus, antenna 

Fig. 34. Merope tuber, antenna. 

Fig. 85. Boreus nivoriundus, antenna. 

Fig. 36. Boreus mvoriundus, labium and maxille. 

Fig. 37. Panorpodes oregonensis, ental portion of tentorium. 
Fig. 38. Panorpodes oregonensis, lateral view of tentorium. 
Fig. 39. Panorpodes oregonensis, caudal aspect of tentorium. 
Fig. 40. Bittacus strigosus, lateral view of tentorium. 

Fig. 41. Bzttacus strigosus, maxilla. 

Fig. 42. Panorpa americana, cephalic aspect of galea. 

Fig. 43. Buttacus strigosus, cephalic aspect of galea. 

Fig. 44. A pterobittacus apterus, labium and maxille. 

Fig. 45. Panorpodes carolinensis, labium and maxille. 

Fig. 46. Merope tuber, labium and maxille. 

Fig. 47. Panorpa americana, maxilla. 

Fig. 48. Panorpa americana, labium and maxille. 

Fig. 49. Panorpodes oregonensis, labium and maxille. 


PLATE XXVIII. 


Fig. 50. Panorpodes oregonensis, epipharynx. 

Fig. 51. Panorpa americana, diagrammatic section to show hypopharynx, salivos 
and salivary duct. 

Fig. 52. Bittacus strigosus, epipharynx, hypopharynx and mandible. 

Fig. 53. <A pterobittacus apterus, hypopharynx and salivary duct. 

Fig. 54. Merope tuber, hypopharynx and salivary duct. 

Fig. 55. Merope tuber, lateral view of galea. 

Fig. 56. Panorpa americana, caudal aspect of head, to show mandibles, tendons 
and postpharynx. 

Fig. 57. Bittacus strigosus, mecaglossa and palpi folded back to show hypo- 
pharynx and salivos. 

Fig. 58. Panorpodes oregonensis, hypopharynx and salivary duct. 

Fig. 59. Merope tuber, epipharynx and mandible. 

Fig: 60. Boreus nivoriundus, hypopharynx. 

Fig. 61. Panorpa americana, epipharynx, hypopharynx, salivos. 


ANNALS E. S. A. 


VoL. XV, Pirate XXV. 


fo naan radrars 


eS 
B) eaetane 


RES NS 


Dae 


F. Q. Otanes 


ANNALS E. S. A. : VoL. XV, Prate XXVI. 


I. Q. Otanes 


Hr 
= 
> 
‘ai 
rs 
I 
) 
AY 
Ss 
mn 
3 
> 


QO. Otanes 


F 


ANNALS E. S. A. Vor. XV, PLATE XXVIII. 


F, Q. Otanes 


THE WING-VENATION OF THE COLEOPTERA.* 


Wm. T. M. Fores, 
Iithaea., IN. OY. 


In the course of the last two generations, since the first 
attempts by Adolph (Nova Acta der Leop.-Carol. deutschen 
Akad. d. Naturf. 41(2), 213, 1880.) and Redtenbacher (Ann. 
d. k. k. naturhist. Hofmuseums I, 153, 1886) the comparative 
study of the wing-veins of the various groups of insects, sup- 
plemented by that of their larval trachee, has shown that all 
insect wings have a venation based on a common plan, whose 
modifications in the various orders are for the most part, well 
understood. In the Coleoptera, alone, of the larger orders, 
there is nothing approaching agreement in interpretation, for 
several reasons. In the first place the venation is sufficiently 
unique, and complicated, to make such a superficial study as 
brought even Adolph and Redtenbacher close to the truth in 
the Lepidoptera, for instance, almost completely futile. The 
complicated foldings also interrupt the veins and cause dis- 
tortions in their courses. Further, the first forms studied for 
their pupal tracheation were specialized Cerambycide, a fam- 
ily in which the tracheation is degenerate and no longer fully 
corresponds to the veins. Several workers, notably Kempers 
(Tijd. voor Entom. 42 to 45) and Kolbe (Archiv fur Naturges. 
67: Beiheft 89, 1901) have been thrown off by Adolph’s or 
Woodworth’s theories of an alternate system of convex and 
“concave veins, which in the manner applied by them, is decep- . 
tive in the higher orders. More recently d’Orchymont has 
proposed a more carefully studied scheme, but his also ignores 
the evidence of the tracheation, and to me seems only half 
correct. Kitthne’s study of the tracheation (Zeits. wiss. Zool. 
112: 692) alone has resulted in essentially the same conclusions 
which are expanded below. His paper is somewhat diagram- 
matically illustrated and appears to have been largely ignored 
by other workers; but I have veritfied his main conclusions, 
the differences between our results being mainly a matter of 
interpretation. 

* The expense of publishing this paper was borne by a grant from the 


Hecksher Foundation for the Advancement of Research, established by August 
Hecksher, at Cornell University. 


328 


1922] Forbes: Wing-Venation of Coleoptera 329 


In the present paper I shall try to identify the main veins 
of the Coleopterous wing with those recognized in other orders, 
and will suggest a tentative scheme of their branching. The 
main identifications, though differing from the several schemes 
which now hold the field, are supported by a convergence of 
evidence from the tracheation and basal sclerites, as well as by 
the character of the veins themselves. 

In interpreting the tracheation my first assumption has been 
that each trachea which is separate in the most generalized 
form available, represents a single main vein, and that together 
all the veins are accounted for. In a single particular this 
assumption has been slightly modified—the identification of 
the first anal stem, as discussed below. 


To take up the main veins in order: 


Costa.—In all the orders of insects the costal vein lies along the 
costal edge of the wing, or is preceded only by a membranous strip, 
and runs far basad, forming a hook-like articulation with the body. 
It contains a weak trachea or none. In the Coleoptera studied the 
base of the costal edge is occupied by a vein, which in Calosoma contains 
a weak trachea. This is certainly costa. In a few forms (Silpha, 
Fig. 24, and Buprestide, for instance) there is a little membrane in 
front of it, but never another vein. 


Subcosta.—In all the known orders of insects subcosta is immediately 
recognizable as a concave vein, that is, it lies at the foot of a trough 
in the surface of the wing, and its cavity is mainly below the level of 
the wing-membrane. The second vein from the costal edge in all the 
Coleoptera is so formed, and may be safely labelled subcosta. It 
contains a strong trachea in all the forms studied (the one labeled “‘C” 
by Comstock and Needham, who overlooked costa). 


Radius.—The third vein of the wing is strongly convex, and forms 
the principal articulation with the thorax, together, that. is, with the 
second axillary sclerite, from which it rises. Its trachea is always 
strong, and rises from the anterior tracheal trunk (Chapman, in Com- 
stock’s “Wings of Insects”) running in front of the wing-process in 
close proximity to C and Se. In the Coleoptera the third of the three 
closely crowded veins at the costal margin of the wing articulates 
in the proper manner, and contains the most posterior of the tracheze 
arising from the anterior trunk, in every form studied, from Cicindela 
to the Cerambycide. It then is radius. 

Media.—With media a more serious problem arises. Media is 
highly unstable in the various orders of insects and may associate 
itself as a branch with either radius or cubitus. In the Coleoptera 
whose tracheation is most complete, however, (Calosoma, Fig. 2, 
Dytiscus, Fig. 5, for instance, and some specimens of Tenebrio, Fig. 6), 
there is an independent trachea that can only be media. In Calosoma 


330 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV; 


and Tenebrio, at least, it arises from the posterior tracheal trunk, as 
in the majority of specialized insects. The corresponding vein is always 
weak, fading out at the base, and the trachea shows a strong tendency 
to weaken, and to lose its terminal portion to the neighboring trachee. 
In Tenebrio it is individually unstable, in some specimens independent, 
in others arising from the base of Cu. In many forms its basal part 
is a mere rudiment (labeled R in Comstock’s ‘Wings of Insects,”’ 
Figs. 309, 310), while its outer part has switched its connection to 
branches running up from Cu, or more rarely down from R. The 
weakness of this vein and trachea would characterize it as M, even 
were there not the further evidence of its position immediately following 
‘the unmistakable Sc and R. It is a “concave”’ vein, like M in the 
Lepidoptera and Neuroptera, and as in them it has no direct connection 
to the basal sclerites. 

In all those Coleoptera whose basal venation is sufficiently spaced 
out, there is an arculus-like bar running across from the base of radius 
to Cu. This evidently represents an anterior arculus, being a short 
sector of vein M (Fig. 6), whose extreme base has fused with R, while 
it anastomoses immediately after, with Cu. In a few cases, where the 
medial trachea is independent, it can be plainly seen, passing from the 
radial to the medial vein-cavity through this bar. 


Cubitus.—Cubitus is a strong convex vein. Here is perhaps the 
best opportunity for disagreement in interpretation. My identification 
is based, first, on the position and independence of the trachea in the 
Adephaga, which have the fullest tracheation, and in some specimens 
at least, of various Serricorns; second, on its basal connection with the 
axillary sclerite (though d’Orchymont considers this connection 
secondary, a result of fusion with the vein I interpret as lst A); third, 
on the fact that the next vein (1st A) arises out of it near its base, just 
as the vein so called does in the Lepidoptera, and several other orders, 
and as the homologous vein (commonly called Cuz) does in the 
Neuroptera and Trichoptera. 

First anal.—The difficulty as to this vein is rather one of nomen- 
clature than of homology, save only in the Phytophaga and Lamelli- 
corns. In the most primitive orders there is an independent vein 
dying between Cu and the anal fan (1st A of Comstock’s figures 116 to 
124). This is in early forms fluctuating in position, and possibly even 
duplicated in a few cases (Comstock, Fig. 117, hind wing); attaching 
itself either to Cu or to the anal fan; but in almost all cases lies close 
beside the anal furrow. In the holometabolous orders it has become 
definitely associated with the cubital stem and appears like a branch of 
cubitus near the base. For this reason it is commonly treated as a 
branch of Cu in certain orders (e. g., the Neuroptera) and has been 
illogically labeled Cup. Of course if counted at all with the cubitals 
it would be Cuz, as it would be the third branch of that stem. In 
other orders (as the Lepidoptera and Diptera) the connection with Cu 
is inconspicuous, either on account of a secondary splitting back, or 
through atrophy of the vein itself (butterflies); and the vein has been 
counted as independent, the true vein Cu, being correctly so labeled. 


1922] Forbes: Wing-Venation of Coleoptera dol 


In the Coleoptera, save in the Phytophaga and some Lamellicorns, 
there is a trachea which splits off from Cu near its base, then frequently 
runs obliquely through the membrane, and enters a vein in the outer 
part of the wing, running with it to the margin (Figs. 3, 5, 6). The 
concave anal furrow lies close below this trachea. In Cupes (Figs. 4, 12) 
the whole is represented by a vein, and meets all the qualifications 
of Ist A (that is, Cus). In higher phytophaga at least, this trachea 
is completely absent, as shown by a Comparison of Comstock’s figures 
308 to 310, with mine of Tenebrio (Figs. 6, 43); and the corresponding 
vein of the imago is also absent. 

Second and following anals—There remain two branched trachee, 
and a third which is also bifurcated in the Adephaga, but more com- 
monly simple. These may be numbered in order: 2d A, 3d A and 4th A. 
They doubtless represent the anal fan of lower orders, and also the 
second and third anals, and supporting vein of the jugum in, the 
Lepidoptera. The first of these is 3-branched at least, as shown plainly 
in the Buprestide (Figs. 6a, 34); but the anterior branch, both trachea 
and vein, is lost in many families, including all the Adephaga, Palpi- 
cornia and Heteromera; and the posterior branch, save in the Elaters, 
Lampyrids, and some Buprestidae and Dermestide, fuses at the apex 
with the anterior branch of 3d A. 

In this discussion the anals are treated as four in number on account 
of the tracheal arrangement, and seem to be homologous with the three 
recognized anals and the jugal brace of the Lepidoptera; but the con- 
dition in the base of the wing is complex, and comparison with Chauliodes 
(Fig. 71: a form which shows the same number of terminal anal 
branches) suggests strongly that the second may be a fusion of an 
original second and third anal; and that the vein here considered a 
cross-vein between 2d A and 3d A may really be a fourth branch of 
2d A; in several forms it has a trachea. 

The permanent cross-veins—Certain cross-veins are-so constant in 
higher insects as to become a part of the hypothetical plan. These are 
the humeral, the arculus, and a series near the middle of the wing 
(known as discocellulars in the Lepidoptera). The humeral cross vein 
shows plainly in several Coleoptera as a short fusion of C and Sc, which 
are everywhere closely parallel. Arculus is plain enough, especially in the 
Serricorns and Heteromera, (Figs. 65 and 66 for instance), and has already 
been discussed as a sector of media. The discocellulars, if present as 
such at all, are disguised by the folding, and must be discussed among 
the more problematical veins. 

Stigma.—The stigma or pterostigma is a thickening of the marginal 
portion of the wing in the neighborhood of the apical part of Se (Scz) 
and R,;. It shows plainly in a great many beetles belonging to the 
Adephaga, Palpicornia and Staphylinoidea, and will be used below as a 
means of identifying the distal sector of Ri. 


3o2 Annals Entomological Society of America __[Vol. XV, 


THE FORKING OF THE VEINS. 


Subcosta is so completely fused with costa and radius that a discus- 
sion of its outer course can lead to no certain conclusion. I have 
postulated a forking beyond the hinge, to account for one of the obscure 
cells at this point in the Carabidz and the double thickening of the 
stigma in Hydrous. The fading out of the trachea of R, in those forms 
that have one at all, shows that the terminal portion of R, has 
been captured by Sc, (a common occurrence). In the more specialized 
forms Sc. is one of the trachez that persists, and with the disappearance 
of true veins in the apical part of the wing, takes an oblique course 
toward the apex regardless of what traces of veins remain (Fig. 5, 6a; 
but compare Fig.6). The trachez of M and 2d A in certain forms behave 
similarly. 

Radius.—R, is a vein that tends strongly to weaken and disappear, 
its terminal portion fusing with Sc. In several Coleoptera there is a 
plain anterior branch of the radial stem which continues in the common 
cavity of Sc and R beyond the point at which the main radial trachea 
leaves it (Fig. 2) . There is no reason to doubt that this is Ry, and that 
the main trachea, beyond the bifurcation, is the stem of Rg. 

Beyond this point tracheation fails to give evidence, as the sub- 
divisions of R, are unstable in all the forms yet studied. The interpre- 
tation laid out on the hypothetical plan (Fig. 1) is based on the assump- 
tions, first, that the apex of the wing in a low holometabolous insect is to 
be sought in the neighborhood of R;, and second, on the plain connection 
of the stub here identified as Rus; across to the stem of R, in such forms 
as. Tetracha (Fig. 13). The terminal veining here introduced into the 
hypothetical plan is nowhere so plain as in Hydrous, but well-marked 
traces survive, not only in the other large Hydrophilide, but in the 
Lamellicorns as well. This group of veins might likewise be interpreted 
as Miss, but the strong tendency to reduction in the median and cubital 
systems of the Neuroptera would suggest a similar interpretation here. 

In the Polyphaga the base of R, is atrophied, leaving the outer part 
as an apparent backward-projecting spur—the radial recurrent (Rr). 
The second radial cross-vein, on the atrophy of a segment of R, crossing 
the main folds, swings into this portion of R,, and is usually reckoned 
with it as a portion of the radial recurrent, which would then be desig- 
nated according to the usual terminology as R, & 2dr. 


Media.—Media has become two-branched in practically all the 
known Neuroptera, and in many is reduced to a single stem, forking 
only at a point corresponding to the nearly veinless apical region of the 
Coleoptera. The presence of but a single medial trachea in all the 
forms studied, save for unstable terminal branching, would suggest 
here that no branches need be sought save in the terminal portion of 
the wing. I have marked as medials those terminal veins that seem to 
connect most closely with the medial stem. The main trachea in the 
Adephaga, runs out in the vein here marked Ms, (Fig. 3); in the Poly- 
phaga swinging into the same vein with Cu toward the margin. The 
two veins that survive in the generality of forms are marked M; and 


1922] Forbes: Wing-Venation of Coleoptera 333 


M, because they are the extreme members of the complex group shown 
by Hydrous. They might be considered Mi;2 and Msy4 if the extra veins 
of Hydrous be considered secondary. | 

In almost all forms (except a few Adephaga and Cupes)-the base 


of media fades out, leaving the main part of it attached at the apex 
only. This sector of the vein is known as the medial recurrent (Mr). 


Cubitus—There is never but. one vein supplied by.. the cubital 
trachea (leaving out of account the vein here treated.as 1st A)., Many 
Neuroptera also, have only. a single corresponding. cubital, or a-single 
main vein supplemented by some secondaries. To judge by the arrange- 
ment of these terminal branches the missing cubital branch has either 
fused completely with the surviving one, or has atrophied on the 
posterior side of it. At this point some Lamellicorns have a trachea not 
represented by any very distinct vein in the imago, which may possibly 
be the missing Cuz, but is more likely a last trace of Ist A. 

In the Hydrophilidz and Haliplide (Figs. 19 to 23), Cu runs toward 
the margin as an independent vein. Comparison with these two fam- 
ilies shows that in the remaining Adephaga the apex of Cu has disap- 
peared by atrophy, while the double trachea suggests that. im. the 
Polyphaga it has fused with Mu. 


First anal.—This is simple. With the atrophy of its base the cross- 
vein cu-a remains to connect it with the stem of cubitus (Hyleccetus, 
Fig. 40). In some forms, as in the Lampyride (Fig. 32) it is not clear 
whether it is the base of the main vein or the cross-vein, which has 
disappeared. 


Second anal.—The second anal trachea divides, at the maximum, 
into three branches. The first corresponding vein has been universally 
considered a branch of the vein here designated Ist A, but if that is the 
case the extraordinary course of its trachea, which actually has to 
turn basad in some Buprestide, to enter its cavity, and which may run 
for some distance in a common vein-cavity with the first anal trachea 
without fusing with it, remains entirely unexplained. This first branch 
is doubtless the one that has disappeared in the Tenebrionide and 
Adephaga (where there is no corresponding trachea); but in the higher 
Phytophaga it seems rather to be Ist A that has vanished, as there is 
no trace of a first anal trachea arising from Cu. The second branch of 
2d A has nothing extraordinary, and receives the unbranched second 
anal trachea in the Tenebrionide (in some specimens only of which 
the third branch also receives a tracheal twig). The third branch has 
apparently evolved in two distinct ways. In a few forms it is entirely 
independent (as in Attagenus, Fig. 35, and many Buprestide, Fig. 34). 
The next, and perhaps most primitive condition, is for it to be con- 
nected by a cross-vein to the upper fork of 3d A, as plainly shown in 
Cebrio (Fig. 30). It is my belief that the same condition holds in the 
other Elateride (s. 1.) and Lampyride, where there are three anal 
twigs below the second anal furrow, and the vein bounding the wedge- 
cell is transverse and tends to disappear by atrophy (Alaus, Pyrophorus, 
Calopteron). In most forms, however, the apex of this branch has 


334 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


obviously fused with the first branch of 3dA, forming a pointed wedge- 
cell, and leaving only two terminal branches below the second anal 
furrow (compare Figs. 32 and 37). 

On the basal side of the wedge-cell there is a short oblique vein 
running from the stem of 2d A to the upper branch of 3d A. Whether 
this is a fourth branch of 2d A, which has permanently joined 3d Au, 
or a cross vein, is not clear. Occasionally it contains a trachea arising 
from 2d A, but tracheze in other crossveins are not entirely unknown. 
In the pupa of Tenebrio and Dytiscus it is more definitely transverse 
than in the imago, a significant point. 


Third anal.—The third anal vein forks once near the base of the 
wing as a rule. Sometimes both branches have a trachea, sometimes 
only the lower. The upper is connected to 2d A by two transverse 
veins, enclosing the wedge-cell between them. In a few forms the 
third anal is simple, presumably by the atrophy of its upper branch, 
which is broken, for instance, in the Lamellicorns (Fig. 62). 


Fourth anal.—The anterior branch of the fourth anal vein is present 
in all save markedly reduced species, and contains a trachea in all 
species with fairly complete tracheation. A second branch is present 
in most Adephaga, running along the inner margin of the wing, and in 
a few a third, running back and stiffening the alula. This is the super- 
ficial interpretation; it is not impossible that a detailed comparison 
with the Neuropteroids will result in a different interpretation. In 
particular the vein here considered 3d As, may possibly belong in 
fact to 4th A. 


CROSS-VEINS. 


It is evident that the Coleoptera are descended from a form with a 
considerable number of cross-veins, which were tending at least to 
take definite positions. Assuming that they were not wholly definite, 
the survival of certain ones was doubtless determined by the folding, 
which necessitated a more complete cross-bracing than in the 
Trichoptera and Lepidoptera, for instance. The humeral has already 
been taken up. Discussion of other cross-veins in the costal region 
would be useless, as the longitudinal veins are almost completely 
fused. Comparison with the Neuroptera would prepare one for a 
large number of such veins, but the few forms in which C and Sc are 
separate (e. g., Cupes, Fig. 12) show no sign of them. 

Between R, and R, there is plain evidence of several cross-veins. 
For the region basad of the pivot-fold, the Hydrophilide, and especially 
the primitive Elaters, give the best evidence. They plainly show two 
cross-veins, one variable in position, but well before the fold of the 
wing, the other stiffening the edge of the first fold, being the outer 
part of the vein marked R,4, in Fig. 30. The latter is obscurely 
indicated in.several Adephaga, but there is no trace, apparently, of the 
first, the radial fork coming just before the hinge. 

Beyond the hinge the Hydrophilidze show only faint traces of veins, 
and most Polyphaga none at all; but the Adephaga have two well- 
developed cross-veins, which may be called 3d r and 4th r. The 


1922] Forbes: Wing-Venation of Coleoptera 335 


vaguely defined vein which stiffens the fold half way between the 
last and the apex in the Gyrinide, for instance, would then be Sth r. 

There would be possible a second explanation of these veins; namely, 
that the pivot fold of the Adephaga corresponds not to that of the 
Hydrophilide and Tenebrionide, etc., but to that of the Coccinellide 
and Malachiide. This would reduce the number of radial cross-veins 
postulated, as it would make the two main cross-veins of the Adephaga 
homologous with the two of the Polyphaga, but it would involve a 
reversal in direction of the two principal transverse folds. It would 
also leave the faint cells of Hydrous unexplained. This interpretation 
seems to me less probable, but must be taken into account, considering 
the variable character of the folding in all parts of the wing. There 
is much room for some one with care and patience to make a study of 
the wing folding, which shows much more variety of type than Wood- 
worth’s account would imply. The forms intermediate between the 
Adephaga and Polyphaga (Staphylinoidea in the broad sense; Figs. 
24 to 28) are all highly modified, and many of them minute, with 
reduced venation; so that very careful analysis will be necessary to 
interpret them. 

Between radius and media (as interpreted by the tracheze) the 
Adephaga have single fully formed cross-vein, marked r-m. In some 
species of Cupes this has migrated far toward the base of the wing, 
(Fig. 4), but in other species (Fig. 12), and in Omma, it is normal. 
In a few Elaters (Fig. 39), it is plainly shown, as a distinct, though faint, 
vein connecting the base of R, with M, but as a rule in the Polyphaga 
it is lost, or incorporated indistinguishably in the radial recurrent. 
(Compare Hydrocharis, Fig. 22, with Hydrous, Fig. 20). 

The obvious cross-vein of the Polyphaga appears to be a second, 
the surviving element of a complex net-veined area, apparently, which 
is faintly visible in some Cerambycide and Chrysomelide, but has 
been mostly obliterated to form the large and complexly folded central 
cell. Aside from the Phytophaga a few other forms show aberrant 
veins or thickenings that may be remnants of this system, notably 
the Cupedide (Figs. 4, 12) and Ostomide (Fig. 49). How much is 
original and how much secondary in the complicated conditions of the 
Malachiidee (Fig. 58) and Coccinellidee (Fig. 56) may sometime appear 
from more detailed study, or the discovery of transitional forms. 

A third radiomedial cross-vein is indicated at the outer boundary 
of the central cell, connecting the stem or stub of Ra; with M:. It 
must be through the survival of this cross-vein that R2;; in the Lamell1- 
corns gets its connection with the medial stem. 

There are two medio-cubital cross-veins, enclosing the so-called 
Oblong cell (O) of the Adephaga and Cupedidee. The more basal of 
these may receive a trachea from media, but I am inclined to consider 
this not significant, as the assumption that it is really the stem of 
M3,4 will not work out into any logical interpretation of the marginal 
veins. In the more specialized Adephaga (Fig. 18) and the Hydro- 
philide there is only one cross-vein. The usual explanation is that 
one or the other has atrophied. It seems more simple to assume the 


336 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


two have fused, especially as in. several Carabide there is a partial 
fusion. The families in which there is a single cross-vein are the 
Cicindelide (save, the genus Pogonostoma, as figured by Horn, Gen. 
Ins., 82, pl. 5, f. 52), Rhysedide and Hydrophilide, with a few stray 
genera of other families. In the remaining Polyphaga the cross-veins 
are obliterated by the fusion of M, with Cu. 

The cross-vein cu-lst a is mentioned under the discussion of that 
vein.. In Cupes alone there is a second cubito-anal cross-vein in th 
outer part of the wing: ::: 2 

» A very’ important ‘cross-vein is the one from the base of Ist A or 
from the fused root of Cu,lst A to the base of 2d A. It is doubtless 
homologous to the ‘anal '‘cross-vein of the Trichoptera and lower Lepi- 
‘doptera.” In all forms but the Cupedide the extreme base of Ist A 
is transverse and appears (with the disappearance of a sector of Ist A) 
as a part of it. I will refer to this combined vein as the anal arculus 
(a. arc.) as its relation to Ist A is exactly that of the arculus to media 
in the Odonata and some other orders. This vein appears in all the 
Adephaga and Staphylinoidea, excluding the Histeridz, but nowhere 
else. Another cross-vein Ist-2d a appears in the outer part of the wing 
in Cupes oculatus (Fig. 12), but in most other Coleoptera it is obliterated 
by the anastomosis of the anterior branch of 2d A with Ist A. 

Two cross-veins may be assumed between 2d A and 3d A, enclosing 
the wedge-cell (W) between them, but as noted in the discussion of 
2d A, it is not quite certain that the inner is a cross-vein, and the 
outer is preserved only in the Elateridee, Lampyride, and a few related 
forms. 

There is in the Cupedide and Adephaga a transverse vein at the 
extreme base between 3d A and 4th A, but its significance is uncertain. 


FOLDING. 


I figure folding diagrams of a few typical Coleoptera (Figs. 7, 16, 
21, 25, 27, 61). In these the portions of the wing reversed (turned 
under or over) in the folded wing are shown dark, those which remain 
right side up are white. Convex folds are indicated by a broken or 
serrate line, concave by an even line. Regions of irregular crumpling, 
and regions not completely folded under, are striated. 


It can be seen that the folding is highly complex, and may differ 
in details in closely related forms, though of the same fundamental 
plan (compare especially Harpalus, Fig. 16, with Dytiscus, Fig. 7). 
The Dytiscid and Hydrophilid foldings are homologized by d’Orchymont 
differently than by me, with the result that he considers the vein I 
call media in the Adephaga to be rather the radial recurrent. I have 
given first weight to the fact it always contains the medial trachea, 
and have assumed that the area at the hinge that folds under has become 
more extensive in the Adephaga, and has crossed the medial vein. 
It should be also noted that the area homologous with the reversed 
portion in the cell of the Adephaga is not the large reversed portion 
of the Polyphaga, but the relatively inconspicuous crumpled strip 


1922] Forbes: Wing-Venation of Coleoptera 337 


above cubitus, as shown by the fact that it alone constantly reaches 
the base of the wing. Hydrocharis (Fig. 22) and other forms with a 
short radial recurrent, show the condition better than Hydrous (Fig. 21). 


DISCUSSION OF CERTAIN FORMS. 


It is not the province of one not a Coleopterist to go into the detailed 
‘discussion of the relationships of the Coleoptezous groups, but some 
points come out so clearly that they should be emphasized. First it is 
strikingly clear that Gahan’s system comes far nearet to agreeing with 
the evidence of the wings than any other known to me. 

Adephaga:—(Figs. 2, 3, 5,7, 10, 11, 18-19)= If venation” méans 
anything at all this is a homogenous group, and includes the Rhysodide 
as a hardly aberrant member. Whether the Cupedide should also be 
included is a discussed question. They certainly have one point of 
divergence from all the typical Adephaga in venation, namely, the 
preservation of the first branch of 2d A as an apparent branch of Ist A. 
The Haliplidz alone of the forms examined have preserved the tip of 
Cu; as have the Pelobiide as figured by d’Orchymont. The sub- 
families of Carabidee are not obviously indicated by the venation, even 
Pseudomorpha being hardly aberrant. Fragments of 2d r appear in 
a few forms (Harpalus, Fig. 15). Rua;s often appears as a strong stub 
(Fig. 13) but never bears terminal branches. Amphizoa does not differ 
obviously from Dytiscus, both having a long straight lst A, with a 
thickening below it. The Gyrinide differ mainly in having a thickening 
above the outer part of the stem of M, of uncertain significance. It 
might be interpreted as a trace of Miy42, but this would not lead to any 
logical working out of the distal part of the wing. 


Cupedide.—(Figs. 4, 12). The characters of this family have been 
abundantly discussed. The difference between the superficially almost 
identical species C. capitatus and C. oculatus is curious. Note espe- 
pecially Ist r-m, 2d Aj, the wedge-cell, and the position of the anal 
cross-veins. 


Staphylinoidea.—Silpha (Figs. 24, 25) and Necrophorus are closely 
related, in fact almost identical in venation as well as wing-folding, 
and show a marked resemblance to the Staphylinide (Fig. 28). Note 
the preservation of the anal arculus, the principal fold of the wing lying 
before the thickened stigma, and the simplified anal region without 
any visible connection between 2d A and 3d A. There is practically 
nothing to connect this group of families with either the Adephaga or 
higher forms, and they might well be a survival of some earlier type. 
The alula of the elytron is preserved, as in the Adephaga and Hydro- 
philide. The folding is unique, but perhaps a little more easily inter- 
preted as Adephagous. 

Brathinus, an interesting intermediate form in body characters, is 
too reduced to have a significant venation. 

Necrophilus (Figs. 26, 27) is far more widely separated from Silpha 
than it from the Staphylinide.. The folding is unique (Fig. 27), the 
wing folding over just beyond the stigma. The genus, while perhaps 


338 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


Silphid, is obviously out of place between Silpha and Necrophorus. 
I believe the small Silphidz will go with it; Prionocheta at least shows 
essentially the same wing. 

Palpicornia.—(Figs. 20-23). This group is interesting as alone 
showing a complex apical venation, as well as being the only one of the 
Polyphaga to preserve traces of the radial cells beyond the fold. The 
folding at the costal margin is as in the Adephaga while the remainder 
of the wing is almost typically Polyphagan. The radial recurrent 
obviously belongs more to the first r-m than to the base of Rs, in several 
genera almost connecting with the stem of M. One anal (2d Aj) is 
always lost. The family is primitive in preserving M, and Cu as sep- 
arate veins, like the lower Adephaga and perhaps the Staphylinoidea, 
but unlike all the higher forms. 

The smaller genera (such as Spheridium, Fig. 23) show a striking 
resemblance to the Lamellicorns, that may possibly be significant, as 
the latter show distinct traces of distal veining. 

Buprestide.—(Figs. 6a, 34). A student here is working on this 
family, which as Gahan notes shows no close resemblance to the Elaters. 
It is evidently a survival, and is one of the very few that has three free 
branches to 2d A. The lack of folding of the wing is not characteristic 
of the family as a whole, since Brachys folds normally. 


Elateroidea.—(Figs. 30-33). The Elateride (Fig. 31) and Lampy- 
ride (Fig. 32) form a very well defined group in venation, to which all 
the small families of Sternoxia but the Rhipiceridz will attach them- 
selves. Cebrio (Fig. 30) is most primitive, and basic for interpreting 
the anal region. A general characteristic is the transverse outer end 
of the wedge cell (which fails in several genera by the loss of the cross- 
vein, and in Tharops alone by its obliquity). Another is the position of 
Ist rin all but a few aberrant groups markedly basad of the radiomedial. 
The folding is also uniform, being a double chevron-fold in the apex, 
rather like that of the Heteromera and lower Buprestide, but utterly 
unlike the Malachiide. The Lampyride are exactly like the most 
specialized Elaters, differing from the typical ones only by the loss of 
the cross vein cu-a. If the venation means anything they are degen- 
erate rather than primitive. 

Malachiide (Melyride).—Figs. 57, 58). These so far as the wings 
show have nothing whatever to do with the Lampyride, and may be 
a survival of a primitive type, especially if the transverse vein from 
the cell to the inner margin is really an independent Cu. The folding 
is very complicated and I have not worked it out fully. The nearest 
thing to it seems to be in the Coccinellide (Fig. 56). There are two 
pivot-folds at the costa, the more posterior of which corresponds in 
its manner of folding with that of the Adephaga and Hydrophilide, 
the more anterior with that of the Bostrychide and Byrrhide. The 
anal region is degenerate and gives no help. A large South American 
species shows no more veins than Malachius. 

Dascylloidea.—(Figs. 37, 38). The Dascyllidee and Rhipiceride are 
almost identical in venation, and distinguished mainly by the lack of 
the special characters of the other groups, in this resembling the lower 


1922] Forbes: Wing-Venation of Coleoptera 339 


members of the Clavicornia, and the Macrodactylia. At present several 
members of this group are considered Buprestidz and one or two prim- 
itive Elateroids are standing as Dascyllide. The Helodide are not even 
remotely related, but vaguely suggest the Dryopide and the Niti- 
dulide. 

Macrodactylia.—(Figs. 41, 42). It is an utter mystery to me how 
Kolbe, with any consideration of the venation, could separate the 
Parnide in three distinct superfamilies. There are differences, but they 
are mainly of the character of degree of development, and could be 
matched in almost any family of Coleoptera containing small species. 
He seems to have particularly emphasized the development of the 
medial recurrent. In venation the series has no particular characters, 
unless perhaps the tendency for R; to be stronger than M;. Psephenus 
has preserved a radial cross-vein, while the European Dryops viennensis 
(Fig. 41) has preserved the usual five anals in the main group, which are 
reduced in the others. The folding is based on the Hydrophilid type, 
but this may not be significant, as this was presumably the original type 
for the Polyphaga generally; the preservation of 2d A; forbids deriva- 
tion directly from the Hydrophilide. 

Lymexylonide (Fig. 40).—I have only been able to study two forms. 
Hyleccetus tenebroides has nothing aberrant about it, and could 
perfectly well belong to the Heteromera, which themselves are not 
widely unlike many other Serricorns. Atractocerus is so modified as 
hardly to be significant, and is strangely suggestive of the Meloide, but 
could equally be derived from Hyleccetus. 

Cleride.—(Fig. 48). This family, which with the Malachiidz makes 
up the Trichodermata, shows none of the primitive characters of the 
Malachiide. On the other hand it is not strongly distinguished in 
venation from the Ostomide. 

Dermestide —(Figs. 35, 36). The Dermestids show at least three rad- 
ically different types of venation. Attagenus (Fig. 35) is primitive in 
having the wedge-cell open by the lack of fusion of 2d A; and 3d Aj, as 
well as in the presence of an ocellus. It resembles nothing else what- 
ever. Dermestes (Fig. 36), represents the ordinary Dermestid type, 
and while well characterized, it would not be out of place in the Das- 
cylloids so far as venation is concerned. The 2d anal furrow seems how- 
ever, to have three veins below and two above it, which would suggest 
a more primitive position for it also. Anthrenus is reduced, but offhand 
would suggest another family type, nearer the normal clavicorns. 

Byrrhide (Figs. 51, 52).—These do not suggest the Dermestide at 
all in venation, nor anything else I have studied except possibly 
Mycetophagus. There are two pivot-folds, as in the Malachtde, 
but otherwise no very close likeness. The Mycetophagide (Fig. 53) 
are more primitive in preserving the wedge-cell, the Byrrhide in having 
cross-vein cu-a. Both show traces of complexity in the vein r-m, 
but this may be a secondary effect of the folding. | 

Ostomide (Trogositide) (Figs. 49, 50)—The most distinctive 
character of this family seems to be a tendency to chitinize the area 
of the wing crossed by r-m, in the form of an arrowhead-shaped mark, 


340 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


exactly as in the Cleridz, and to a rather strong preservation of the tip 
of Mi. A chitinization beyond the pivot-fold alone gives a slight 
special likeness to the Hydrophilidee, with which they agree in type of 
folding, 

Heteromera (Figs. 6, 43-46).—There is nothing about the venation 
of the Heteromera to separate them in two groups corresponding to 
those in Leng’s Catalogue, and on the whole not much that is distinctive. 
The folding, as in the Hydrophilidee, Buprestidae, Elateroidea, Dascyl- 
loidea, Dermestidee, Macrodactylia, etc., is of what may -be called 
the normal type, dominated by a double pivot fold in the same position 
as in the Adephaga. The venation of the same region is rather simple, 
and possibly nearest to the Buprestidz which fold their wings, and the 
QOstomide. In the anal region 2d A; is invariably lost, but the type 
is that normal in families mentioned, in other points. The Erotylide 
have the same venation, and should be re-examined as to homogeneity 
as a family, as some of them have heteromerous tarsi. 


Meloide.—The Meloide (Fig. 47) at first sight are markedly 
divergent from the remainder of the Heteromera; but the points of 
divergence seem merely to be the result of reduction. The radial cell 
is lost, and the outer ends of the radial and medial recurrents have 
become nearly transverse, and continuous with the radiomedial cross- 
vein, giving a characteristic appearance to the outer, part of the wing. 
In the anal region there are three simple veins, with a chevron-shaped 
structure between the second and third, toward the base. At first 
sight this arrangement seems unique, but is easily derivable from the 
normal heteromerous type by the loss of the lower side of the wedge- 
cell and vein 2d A3,3d Ay. The Trictenotomide of Africa seem to be 
intermediate. 


The Rhipiphoride have so completely lost their veining that they 
might be interpreted in any way. The few traces of veins left are not 
specially suggestive of the Meloide, but the other characters and habits 
place the family in this neighborhood. The Stylopide are also extremely 
reduced; but the venation, so far as preserved, seems to agree with 
that of the Meloide. 


Nitidulide (Figs. 54, 55).—Phenolia grossa is a reduced form, 
but with an extraordinarily complex type of folding, which I have not 
tried to work out in detail. The recurrents form a deep loop, exactly 
as in the Histeride, but the character is as likely as not to be due to 
convergence, as the forms have no other special likeness. 

Histeride (Fig. 29)—Ganglbaur by some extraordinary slip put 
this family in the Staphyliniformia on venational characters, stating 
that the medial recurrent is absent. In fact Mr is an exceptionally 
strong and heavy vein, as well as Rr, and both appear to take part 
in the folding of the wing, which resembles the Staphylinide in no way. 
Save for the preservation of R; as a vein in the outer part of the wing, 
the form would be easily derivable from the other clavicorns, by an 
increase of the folded portion. In any case, as there is no trace of the 
anal arculus, and the recurrents are fully developed, the relationships 


1922] Forbes: Wing-Venation of Coleoptera 341 


of the form are to be sought in the latter families and not in the 
Staphyliniformia. 

Coccinellide (Fig. 56), Endomychide.—These two families agree in 
the curious anal system formed of two loops, and the curious manner 
of folding, with two hinge-folds working together. The venation is 
adjusted to this folding, and reduced, even in species as large as Epi- 
lachna, so that except as 1t emphasizes the isolation of the family the 
venation is of little use. What likeness there is, is to the Malachiide. 

Bostrychoidea (Figs. 59-61).—The Bostrychide are characteristic, 
and the Ptinide resemble them closely. The folding is very simple- 
‘(Apate, Fig. 61) and derived from a type with anterior pivot-fold,. 
such as the Melachiide. In venation the principal character is the 
origin of My, directly from the cross-vein, whereas it is free in almost 
all the other Polyphaga. Dinapate is not aberrant in the least. 

Lamellicornis (Fig. 62).—All the Lamellicorns have a single type of 
venation. There is a strong tendency for the central cell to be obvious, 
and to keep its rounded form, and R; frequently switches its attachment 
from the upper to the lower side of it, as in the figure. The anal region 
is characterized especially by the reduction of the upper fork of 3d A 
to a short stub running across toward 2d A, the complete disappearance 
of the wedge-cell, and the detachment of Ist A and the two upper 
branches of 2d A, which show as fine chitinous streaks or disappear 
entirely. I have seen no form in which all three were distinct; in 
some Ist A is visible close to the junction of My, with Cu (Kuthne, 
Fig. 21), in others it is 2d A; that is preserved; 2d As is usually present. 
The radial cross-vein appears always to be absent, but the apical 
system of veins are more distinct than in any other family save the 
Hydrophilide, R4,; often showing as a distinct stub, connected with 
Rei3, and Mr showing a decided angle at the point where M;, is 
presumably given off. 

In general the Trogide and Lucanide have a larger cell below the. 
base of 2d A, but the families are not well separated in venation. 

Phytophaga (Figs. 63-68).—This group tends strongly to simplifica-. 
tion of the anal region, but the lower forms are quite typical. There 
is, with a few exceptions, a spur on the outer side of r-m, and rarely 
one on the inner side also, or even more complex structures involving 
the first radiomedial as well. The central cell is apt to be well-outlined,> 
and M, usually is strongly developed and attaches to it. Aberrant 
forms, however, like Distenia undata, figured, violate all the defini-: 
tions of the group, and make it undefinable on venation. In Prionus 
the anal region is almost like that of Hydrous. On the other hand the_ 
typical venation, with a spur on the second radiomedial cross-vein, 
is universal in the Chrysomelide and Mylabride (Bruchide) and is” 
carried over into the Anthribidz of the Rhynchophora, whose position 
in the group cannot be challenged. The higher Rhynchophora,. of, 
course, are highly modified in connection with their peculiar wing, 
folding, though even they show some slight trace at times of the char- 
acteristic spurred cross-vein. 

The folding is of the Hydrophilid type, 


342 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


SUMMARY. 


The venation of the Coleoptera is based on the same funda- 
mental plan as that of the Neuroptera and other Holometabola, 
but with a rather large number of cross-veins. Costa is typical, 
not always marginal; subcosta normal, concave, usually fusing 
with radius; radius with R, obsolescent, fusing with Sc, Rs 
sharply divergent from R, at origin, and usually obsolescent at 
root, then broken by the principal fold of the wing, Re and ; 
represented by parallel more or less rudimentary veins toward 
the costa, R4:; bending down sharply on the outer side of a 
central cell where all the folds of the wing tend to converge, then 
turning out, and when complete ending in one branch near 
apex and one far below, near M;. (Hydrophilidz, Histeride), 
usually reduced to a short stub (Adephaga, Scarabeoidea) or 
lost. Media oblique from R to Cu near root, then obsolete a 
distance, then showing as a spur attached at its apex to Cu, in 
the outer part of the wing with two divergent branches, repre- 
senting M, and M,; Cu simple, strong to fold, then usually 
lost beyond or fused with M,; anals complexly anastomosing, 
typically with 6 or 7 terminations, of which only one belongs 
tor dist wae 

The Haliplide are generalized among the Adephaga, the 
Amphizoide very close to the Dytiscide. 

The Hydrophilide contrast with all the other Polyphaga 
in the preservation of both M, and Cu, and often in a more or 
less complete apical venation. Spheridium suggests the 
Lamellicorns. 

The Silphide are very near the Staphylinidz in venation; 
the Necrophilus group less close. They form an isolated group 
apparently not nearer the Polyphaga than Adephaga. 

The Histeride have nothing to do with the Staphyliniformia, 
but are Clavicorn or isolated. 

The Elateride and Lampyride are closely related, and the 
venation suggests that the Lampyridz are degenerate from an 
early elater type, not primitive. 

The Malachiide, Coccinellidee and some other families seem 
to make a separate group, which certainly has nothing to do 
with the Lampyridz or Cleridz. 

The Rhipiceride are Dascylloid, not Elateroid, as noted 
by Gahan. 


1922] Forbes: Wing-Venation of Coleoptera 343 


The Cleridz are possibly related to the Ostomide. 

The Lymexylonidz are not especially generalized, and suggest 
the point of origin of the Heteromera. 

The Heteromera show no sign of double origin where now 
divided; the Meloide on the other hand, contrast strongly with 
the families associated with them, apparently resembling the 
Rhipiphoride and Stylopide. 

The Clavicornia are a heterogeneous group, on which light 
will certainly be thrown by the venation and folding. 


344 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 
EXPLANATION OF PLATES. 
ABDREVIATIONS USED. 

C—Costa. 4thA,— Presumed second branch of 

Sc—Subcosta. fourth anal. 

Sci, Sce—its branches. hum—humeral cross-vein. 

R—Radius. arc—arculus. 

Ri, Re, Rs, Ra, Rs—its branches. a. arc—anal arculus (cross-vein Ist-2d 

Rs—Stem of radial sector. and base of Ist A). 

M—Media. r—radial cross-veins. 

My, Me, M3, Ma—its branches. t-m—radiomedial cross-veins. 

lst A—First anal vein. m-ctt—mediocubital cross-veins. 

2d A—Second anai vein. cu-a—cubitoanal cross-veins. 

2dAi, 2dA2, 2dA;—its branches. Ist-2d a, 2d-3d a—interanal cross- 

3dA—Third anal vein. veins. 

3dAi, 83dA»—its branches. O—Oblong cell (2d M). 

4thA,;—Fourth anal vein. W—Wedge-cell (2d 2d A). 

st—Pterostigma. 
PLATE XXIX. 

Fig. 1. Hypothetical plan of wing venation of Coleoptera, based mainly on 
Cupes (base and cell), Cebrio (anal region) and Hydrophilus (apex). 
The conventional symbols for the veins and cells are used, namely: 

Fig. 2. Tracheation of wing of imago of Calosoma species. The tracheze are 
shown as solid lines, the veins stippled. 

Fig. 3. Tracheation of imago of Dytiscus verticalis. 

Fig. 4. Venation of Cupes capitata. 

PLATE XXX. 

Fig. 5. Tracheation of young pupa of Dytiscus, from a preserved specimen. 
The tracheze are shown so far as made out, by solid lines, the vein- 
cavities stippled. The specimen is imperfect and a fresh wing would 
probably show more trachee and veins. 

Fig. 6. Tracheation of young pupa of Tenebrio molitor (about one day after 
pupation). The trachee are all as shown in one mount, the veins 
restored by comparison with the late pupa and imago. 

Fig. 6a. Tracheation of young pupa of Agrilus ruficollis. Slide by Henry Good. 

Fig. 7. Diagram of wing-folding of Cybister. The portions of the wing reversed 
in folding are shown black. Concave folds are indicated by even 
lines, convex ones by toothed lines. Regions of the wing, which 
are half folded over, or crumpled, are hatched. 

Figs.8,9. Folded wing of Apate capucina (Polyphaga, Bostrychide); the veins 
cross-hatched and concealed portions dotted in. Dorsal and ventral 
views. 

Figs. 10, 11. Folded wing of Colymbetes sculptilis (Adephaga, Dytiscide); like 
Figures 8 and 9. Dorsal and ventral views. 

PLATE XXXI. 

Fig. 12. Cupes oculata (Cupedide). Slide by courtesy of C. T. Brues. 

Fig. 18. Tetracha virginica (Cicindelide). 

Fig. 14. Galerita janus (Carabide). 

Fig. 15. Harpalus caliginosus (Carabide). 

Fig. 16. Same; folding plan (compare Figure 7). 

Fig. 17. Pheropsophus equinoctialis (Carabidze; South America). 

Fig. 18. Trogus glaucus (Dytiscide; South America). 

Fig. 19. Cnemidotus edentulus (Haliplide). 

Fig. 20. Hydrous triangularis (Hydrophilide). 

Fig. 21. Same, folding plan (compare Figure 7). 

Fig. 22. Hydrocharis obtusatus (Hydrophilide). 

Fig. 23. Sphzridium scarabeoides (Hydrophilide). 


Fig. 


Fig. 


Fig. 


Fig. 


Innes, 4 


Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 


Fig. 
Fig. 


Forbes: Wing-Venation of Coleoptera 345 


PLATE XXXII. 
Silpha species (Silphidz). 
Same. Folding plan (see Figure 7). 
Necrophilus hydrophiloides (Silphidz?). 
Same. Folding plan (see Figure 7). 
Staphylinus maculosus (Staphylinidz). 
Hister inequalis (Histeridze; Europe). 
Cebrio bicolor (Cebrionidz). 
Elater discoideus (Elateride). 
Photuris pennsylvanicus (Lampyridez). 
Pactopus hornii (Throscide). 
Dicerca lurida (Buprestide). Slide by Henry Good. 
Attagenus pellio (Dermestidz). 


PATE SOCK ILT. 


Dermestes marmoratus (Dermestide). 

Sandalus porosus (Rhipiceridz). 

Dascyllis plumbeus (Dascyllide). 

Cucujus clavipes (Cucujide). 

Hylecoetes tenebroides (Lymexylidz; Europe). 
Dryops viennensis (Dryopide; Europe). Our species have lost 2d Aj. 
Heterocerus pallidus (Heteroceridez). 

Tenebrio molitor (Tenebrionidez). 

Penthe pimelia (Melandryide). 

Mycterus scaber (Melandryidz). 

An undetermined species representing the Cistelide. 
Pomphopoea sayi (Meloidz). 


PLATE XXXIV. 


Trichodes apivorus (Cleride). 

Trogosita virescens (Ostomide). 

Tenebroides sp. (Ostomide). 

Byrrhus sp. (Byrrhidz). 

Nosodendron unicolor (Byrrhide). 

Mycetophagus species (Mycetophagide). 

Glischrochilus fasciatus (Nitidulide). 

Phenolia grossa (Nitidulide). 

Coccinella transversa (Coccinellide). 

Malachius aeneus (Melyride; Europe). 

Collops bipunctata (Melyridz). 

eae een Q (Bostrychide). Slide by courtesy of Henry 
ietrich. 


PLATE XX XV. 


Apate capucina (Bostrychide; Europe). 

Same. Folding diagram; compare Figures 7, 8 and 9. 

Lucanus dama (Lucanidz). 

Asemum nigrivenum (Cerambycide). 

Distenia undata (Cerambycidz). 

Leptura canadensis (Cerambycide). 

Caryoborus arthriticus (Mylabride-Bruchide). 

Donacia aequalis (Chrycomelide). 

Entomoscelis adonidis (Chrysomelide). 

Neuronia species (Trichoptera). Hind wing for comparison with the 
hypothetical type of the Coleoptera. 

Chorista australis (Panorpata; Choristide; Australia). After Esben- 
Petersen. Hind wing. 

Chauliodes pectinicornis. (Neuroptera; Sialida). Hind wing. 


ANNALS E. S. A. Vo. XV, PLatE X XIX. 


3dAz 3d A, 2dAi+2 


W. T. M. Forbes 


Annats E. S. A. VoL. XV, PEATE XXX. 


me IIA yu 


tert r 
ret TR 
Scot WN = 
wn ee la 


SLT) ji 


W. T. M. Forbes 


ANNALS E. S. A. VoL. XV, PLraTE XX-X1; 


2dA, 2dA, 
+3dA, 


W. T. M. Forbes 


ANNALS E. S. A. Vor. XV, PratE XXXII. 


SdArGdA, 2dA,2dA, 2A: 


2d A, 2dA:2 2dAi 


W. T. M. Forbes 


Annats E. §S. A. Vor. XV. Prats X XXIII. 


Ma+Cu 46 


W. T. M. Forbes 


ANNALS E. S. A. VoL. XV. PLATE XXXIV. 


2dAs43dA, 2dAr tS 


2dA2 1stA 


W. T. M. Forbes 


ANNALS E. S. A. VoL. XV. Prats XX XV. 


W. T. M. Forbes 


STUDIES OF THE SPECIES IN THE GENUS CICADELLA 
LATREILLE (HOMOPTERA) OF NORTH 
AMERICA, NORTH OF MEXICO. 


Curis E. OLSEN, 
West Nyack, N. Y. 


In working over the species in the genus Cicadella, which 
from time to time had gathered in the writer’s collection and in 
collections loaned for study, it was found impossible, from the 
present literature, to determine and properly place all the 
forms at hand. Some of these closely related and undescribed 
forms obviously caused considerable confusion at times and it 
became evident that a review with further study was quite 
necessary. 

In reviewing this genus the author was confronted by sev- 
eral intricate questions. These questions were communicated 
to and discussed with other scientists interested in this partic- 
ular genus. In some of these communications the main points of 
the author were sustained and a good deal of encouragement 
was given, while in one or two cases it was pointed out that his 
views were probably misguided. In such cases of doubt these 
views were dropped for possible further consideration and study. 

Liberal use has been made of ‘‘sub-species’’ in place of 
““variety’’; all forms which show a more or less constant dis- 
tinction from the typical species, and which it would not, by 
structural characters, be safe to call species, although in some 
cases they may be such, are placed as sub-species. All others, 
more or less varying in color combinations and designs from the 
typical form, have been given a varietal name where such was 
deemed advisable for the purpose of identification. In this 
paper little use is being made of external genital characters for 
the reason that where the differential characters were mostly 
wanted the genital differences were too small or too variable to 
depend on, and preference was given to other structural char- 
acters, color designs, and patterns. 
bei The ‘‘Reivew of the Tettigonide”’ by Ball, 1901, has been 
taken as basis for this study. This valuable work, which was 
published twenty years ago, is today still indispensable for the 


393 


354 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


study of the sub-family Cicadelline, but since its date of publi- 
cation a number of changes have been made and some addi- 
tions have been found of which no records have been made; 
these changes and additions have all been included in this paper. 

Van Duzee, 1916 and 1917, has been followed in the higher 
names, viz.: Family Cicadellide, sub-family Cicadelline, tribe 
Cicadellini, and genus Cicadella, as neither. literature nor time 
was available for the checking-up of this. 

This genus can be recognized by the two ocelli placed on the 
posterior half of disk of vertex, about equal distance between 
eyes and center, portion of the front encroaching upon the dor- 
sal part of vertex, the ledges over the antennal sockets are not 
prominent and the anterior tibia are not sulcate. Distant, 1908, 
mentions, in separating it from Kolla, that ‘‘the lateral margin 
of the vertex in line with the inner margins of eyes.” This is 
rather misleading, and there is no doubt that what he meant 
was that the lateral margins were not in line with the outside of 
the eyes, as they are in Kolla. 

A number of suggestions have been made; the very first one 
is to consider Cicadella viridis Linneus as a possible accidental 
introduction which did not become established on this continent. 

In the study of hieroglyphica, the writer ‘‘struck a snag”’ in 
trying to recognize the species from the short and incomplete 
description by Say. On this particular point the author sought 
advice from other interested friends. 

The answers received were varied, both concurring and con- 
trary to a suggestion of the author. But, as it is exceedingly 
difficult to prove or disprove the questions that arose, it is 
better left as it is for the present. It is rather unfortunate 
that Say’s type is not in existence; if it were, there would never 
have been the slightest doubt, but, as it is, his short description 
will answer for another species in this genus as well. 

Cicadella confluens Uhler has been given specific rank, for 
the reason given in the article, and the figure will assist in 
explaining doubtful points. Consequently, Ball’s variety 
uhlert has been shifted to be a variety of confluens. 

Tettigonia compta Fowler, 1900, has been revived as a sub- 
species, a rank to which it seems surely entitled. It appears to 
have a different form of habitation, seeking the higher and more 
arid regions of Mexico. This, together with its great difference 
of appearance will warrant the designation of sub-species for it. 


1922] Olsen: Cuicadella of North America 355 


Kolla similis Walker, 1851, has been included in this genus 
as it seems to compare better with the type Cicadella viridis 
Linneus than it does with the type Kolla insignis Distant, 
although I have never seen specimens of the latter type. Taking 
this species out of Kolla may possibly improve that genus, the 
characters of which at their best are none too good for our 
known, North-American species. 

Cicadella circellata Baker, 1898. It is quite possible that 
Signoret’s atropunctata is the same as this; further study is 
therefore warranted, and particularly of material from Brazil. 

Through the courtesy of Mr. Edmund Gibson the writer has 
had the privilege of studying a collection of specimens in this 
genus from the United States National Museum. Dr. F. E. 
Lutz kindly gave permission to examine the material in the 
collection of The American Museum of Natural History, and 
Mr. H. G. Barber turned over his very valuable collection to 
my disposal. Mr. E. P. Van Duzee, Dr. E. D. Ball, and others 
have kindly assisted with desirable specimens and were kind 
enough to answer correspondence on this subject. To these 
gentlemen I am very grateful for their unfailing assistance and 
to them I wish here to express my sincere appreciation. These 
collections, together with my own, accumulated material, have 
made this paper possible. 


Cicadella viridis Linnaeus, 1758 


This species has been included in our faunal list on the 
strength of a single record by Provancher, 1889. The specimen 
was seen in Provancher’s collection at Quebec, Canada, and 
examined by Van Duzee, 1912. Its identity cannot be ques- 
tioned. This record is rather unique for such a widely distrib- 
uted species of the Old World. It appears in most of the Euro- 
pean lists as a common species abundantly collected; it is 
reported from the British Islands (Edwards 1888), across the 
Danish peninsular (Jensen-Haarup 1915-1920), through Rus- 
sia (Oshanin 1907), to Japan (Onuki 1901); in Europe as far 
south as Italy (Ferrari 1895). It occurs in damp, grassy loca- 
tions along edges of swamps and meadows. 

Had this species once gained foothold and become estab- 
lished here, there is every good reason to believe that it, like 
so many other Hemiptera, would find but little difficulty in 
maintaining itself, if not actually spreading. At least we might 


356 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


expect to corroborate this old record of Provancher, 1889. 
Although this record is annotated by “‘Peu commune, Cap 
Rouge,’’ it is apparently without a definite date, but must have 
been collected previous to the appearance of the publication, 
which was issued about August, 1889, thirty-three years ago. 

Until further collecting of this species on our continent 
occurs, it may be well to suppose that Provancher’s specimen 
was an introduced, stray individual, and that the species so far 
has not become established here, which explains its absence in 
all other collections and local lists. Taxonomically it would be 
most desirable to have this species with us as it represents 
type of family, subfamily, tribe and genus, but economically 
we are better off without it. It may be well to suggest to col- 
lectors in the northern section of our territory, and especially in 
Eastern Canada, to be on the look-out for the possible occur- 
rence of this species. 


Cicadella marathonensis, Olsen, 1918. 


Recently described and figured by the author, in the Bulletin 
of The American Museum of Natural History, from a female 
specimen collected by Dr. F. E. Lutz, at Marathon, Texas. It 
is regrettable that this should be the only specimen known, 
but it is so distinct from all our other known Cicadellide that it 
cannot be confused with any other species. 

It has been suggested by one of our eminent cicadelists 
that this species may belong in the genus Kolla and perhaps be 
one of the species described there. This point has been care- 
fully considered; although there is very little difference between 
the genera Cicadella and Kolla yet marathonensis fails to com- 
pare with the latter. The vertex is more obtuse, the area between 
the eyes and ocelli is slightly shallow (not foveate as in Kolla), 
and the sides of the pronotum are entirely different from that 
of Kolla, more nearly like those of Cicadella. 


Cicadella multilineata Fowler, 1900. 


This very large species was described by Fowler from Pinas 
Altos in Chihuahua, Mexico, and it seems that it has not been 
reported on since. It is quite distinct both in size and color 
from all our other known North American species. 


Vertex well produced, markings of vertex, pronotum, scutellum 
and veins of elytra black in strong contrast to the yellowish-gray 


1922] Olsen: Cicadella of North America 357 


ground color, with apex of vertex, anterior part of pronotum, cell 
between the two claval veins and subcostal cell strongly tinged with 
bright yellow. Size: Length 10.1 to 10.5 mm., width 2.7 to 2.9 mm. 


Twelve specimens were collected by Mr. H. G. Barber at 
Huachuca Mountains, Arizona, July 12th to August 3rd, 1905, 
which agree admirably well with Fowler’s description and figure 
except as to the color of the underslde. They fail to have the 
bright red venter and legs described for the species, but have 
a pale, orange-yellow color with indications of the varigated 
black and testaceous rather weakly shown. 


Cicadella hieroglyphica Say, 1831. 


This species was described by Say from specimens collected 
in Arkansas. Its color and markings are subject to variation 
but Say mentions only one color-form and neglects altogether 
the details of the markings which are so important distinguish- 
ing characters at the present time. He apparently made an 
error or else he did not describe the commonest form when he 
mentions in his description ‘‘hemelytra obsoletely spotted, 
nervures being pale.” The writer has not seen any example 
among the great number examined which could truly be said 
to have “‘nervures pale,’’ except in some forms where it was 
evident that the pigmentation in general had not developed, or 
in a few examples in which the nervures were pale near the 
base of the elytra and for a very short distance beyond. It is 
not probable that Say should have selected such a specimen or 
specimens to describe; at least this part is a serious discrepancy 
in his description as throughout the whole series of hieroglyphica 
and its allied forms (except one extreme subspecies, which may, 
when enough collecting has been done, be considered a good 
species), the veins appear dark. Is it possible that Say should 
have had a gothica before him? This would be an exceedingly 
hard question to settle as there are no types in existence. The 
description in general can be applied to both species except for 
the ‘‘pale nervures’’ which would fit gothica much better than 
lieroglyphica. However, taking all in all and arguing for and 
against, it is not advisable at this time to propose any change 
in the taxonomy, if indeed there is to be any, but, at the same 
time, it is well for those that try to identify hieroglyphica by 
Say’s original description to bear in mind that they have dark 
veins in general. 


858 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


Several new forms have been recognized as additional sub- 
species and varieties of this species; they could not well be 
identified with hieroglyphica or any of its described varieties. 
It was, therefore, obvious that the describing and naming of 
these forms would materially lessen the difficulty in identifying 
both hieroglyphica and confluens. In most cases and as far as 
this study has revealed, these new forms are more or less 
confined to certain geographical areas. 

Typical form: Vertex well produced, obtusely conical, about a 
right angle; length of head, .8—.9 mm.; width, including eyes, 1.7 mm., 
anterior lateral margins bulging from just before the eyes, taking up 
with the obtuse apex, posterior margins rather evenly and strongly 
arched, disk evenly and gently convex, a very slight depression between 
the eyes and ocelli, sculpturing not very strong, general appearance 
rather smooth. The general color varies considerably from yellowish- 
gray to greenish, and from a brick-red to a grayish-green or brown 
with indistinct spots and blotches on head and pronotum, with the 
characteristic black markings surrounding an imaginary light T and 
usually with streaks, more or less conspicuous, and dark veins on the 
elytra. Males and females of about the same color. 


Say, in his description of this species, mentions only one 
color form, i. e., ‘‘dull rufous’’; this must then be considered 
the typical color. It is found very commonly in this color, 
from which it varies into several other colors as mentioned 
above. 

The ‘‘slaty form” mentioned by Dr. Ball, 1901, should, 
without doubt be referred to the variety dolobrata rather than 
to hieroglyphica, (see variety dolobrata). This color transition 
is more evident in the females than in the males of these two 
forms. 

In Van Duzee’s Catalogue, 1917, the distribution for this 
species and the there mentioned three varieties is given in 
common. It seems obvious and quite important that the dis- 
tribution should be considered apart for each of these forms, 
at least in this case. Dr. Ball, 1901, arranged them in two 
groups and gave the distribution of each group, which was 
more nearly correct. These two groups will not always be found 
in the same territory; at least one of the groups has quite a 
distinct distribution. There are several other closely related, 
yet undescribed forms (which will be treated in the pages to 
follow), that have been the cause of a good deal of confusion 
and it is obvious that local distribution must be considered for 


1922] Olsen: Cicadella of North America 359 


each one of these forms even though in some instances rep- 
etition will occur. 

The range of this species, typical form, extends from the 
Rockies about Colorado, east throughout Nebraska and Iowa 
to Illinois, south-west to New Mexico and Arizona. In the 
East it is represented by a single capture in Tennessee, De Long 
1906, and another single example in the writer’s collection from 
La Grange, Georgia, 17, VIII, 1918, taken by Dr. A. H. Stur- 
tevant. A quite northern record is Wisconsin, which is prob- 
ably correctly identified by Saunders and De Long, 1917. 


Cicadella hieroglyphica var. dolobrata Ball, 1901. 


Shape and characters similar to that of typical hieroglyphica 
but color darker, especially in the males, which range from all 
black with but few light markings, to black specimens irrorate 
with white on vertex and pronotum. 

The characteristic markings of the species are usually 
obsolete in the males, but not so obscure in the females and 
sometimes rather well defined. Their color is slate to nearly 
black; I have never seen a female that would answer entirely 
to the color description of this variety. 

Following is the result of the study of two collections: First 
lot: Langdon, Mo. VII, 14, —VIII, 28, H. G. Barber. Seven- 
teen specimens, nine males, (typical dolobraia), eight females, 
rather slate gray in general appearance, with a good deal of 
light pattern in strong contrast to the markings on the 
vertex and anterior part of the pronotum. They would very 
well pass for Ball’s ‘‘slaty form’’ but are undoubtedly the 
females of the above mentioned males. The lot is fairly con- 
stant and collected in a space of about six weeks. Second lot: 
From ‘‘C. Mo. 96.”’ (abbreviation for Central Missouri 1896?), 
U. S. National Museum Collection. Ten specimens pasted on a 
card, seven of which are typical dolobrata males, the remaining 
three were females with vertex and pronotum as in the former 
lot, but a shade darker on the elytra. These are almost indis- 
putably males and females of the same brood. 

The distribution of this variety follows that of the typical 
hieroglyphica except that it is not reported from as many places. 
Dr. Ball, 1901, gives the same general distribution for both, 
additional distributions are Olsen, 1918, Boulder, Colorado; 
De Long, 1916, one specimen from Colliersville, Tennessee. 


360 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


There is no doubt that this variety will be found wherever the 
typical form occurs, if thorough collecting is done. 


Cicadella hieroglyphica sub-species lutzi n. sub-sp. 


Male: Vertex shorter and wider in proportion than in either 
hieroglyphica or the variety dolobrata, eyes more prominent, two longi- 
tudinal, slightly elevated ridges passing over the ocelli, leaving the 
central disk and the area between the ocelli and eyes slightly but 
distinctly concave. The whole vertex has otherwise a rather flat 
appearance. Pronotum rather short, and only slightly convex, lateral 
margins of the elytra, from dorsal aspect, tapering gradually to an 
acute point. 

Color. A shining black spot on the apex of vertex and face, the 
reflexed portion of the face is finely lineated with brown, curved lines, 
lateral edge of vertex just behind the reflexed portion of face with a 
strong, short, black line almost touching the eyes. Front yellowish- 
white, mottled with black, but little broken up; this mottling is extended 
so that it connects with the apical spot at four places, a strong, median 
light stripe running from the black spot at the apex to the clypeus, 
sometimes interrupted by the black mottling crossing it. Genz pure 
white, immaculate. Lore bright yellow, fuscous along the clypean 
suture. Clypeus cream yellow with a dark, narrow median line. 
Pectus black with a broad white spot just below the eyes followed by 
a smaller one. Vertex with the characteristic hieroglyphica “T,” but 
differing principally from the typical hieroglyphica as follows: A 
strong black line following around the base of the ‘““T” up along both 
sides of the stem, following along under the divergent and recurved 
parts of the “‘T,”’ going back obliquely across the ocelli, striking against 
the eyes, a lateral branch shooting forward between the ocelli and eyes, 
terminating before it reaches the margin in a somewhat angulate spot; 
the light stem of the ‘“‘T”’ passes uninterruptedly through to the apical 
spot. 

The suture between the reflexed portion of the face and vertex 
marked with a delicate, black line, pronotum dark with an anterior 
light band irregularly marked with black and dark brown, markings 
more pronounced, and of a vermiculate character on the anterior band. 
Scutellum with two black vittz running from basal margin slightly 
inside and parallel to the lateral margins until it strikes the dark, 
impressed suture, directly backwards striking the lateral margins 
before the tip. Elytra bluish-black, the costal margin and margins of 
claval suture bright bluish-gray, sometimes with green mottling, 
nervures dark, cells irregularly sparsely spotted or mottled with gray. 


Females unknown. 


This sub-species can be separated from typcial hieroglyphica 
and var. dolobrata by its shorter, broader and flatter vertex, 
smaller size and more pointed posterior. Its general dark- 


1922] Olsen: Cuicadella of North America 361 


bluish and somewhat shining color will readily separate it from 
hieroglyphica while the light markings of the vertex will serve 
to distinguish it from dolobrata. 

Described from eighteen males, specimens all from Arizona. 
Five males from ‘‘Phoenix, Arizona, R. Kunze Collection’’ 
American Museum of Nat. Hist. collection; seven males from 
‘*Phoenix, Arizona, R. Kunze Collection’’; and one male from 
’ Phoenm, Arizona; «G-1-02,'> BH. G. Barber Collection. ‘Two 
males from “Arizona C. U. Lot. Cornell U .Lot 411 and 414,’’ 
one male from ‘“‘Arizona U. Lot P. R. Uhler Collection,’’ col- 
lection of United States National Museum. In time, it may 
prove to be a perfectly good species. This can better be ascer- 
tained when the female becomes known. At present the rank 
of sub-species will serve every purpose. Male holo-type and 
three male para-types in The American Museum of Nat. Hist.; 
four male para-types in Mr. H. G. Barber’s collection; four 
male para-types in U. S. Nat. Mus. Coll.; six male para-types 
in author’s collection. 


Cicadella hieroglyphica sub-species barberi n. sub-sp. 


Small, slender, pale yellowish-green, scarcely marked. Vertex, 
anterior pronotum, scutellum, costal margins of the elytra and all 
beneath from a pale straw-yellow to a slight greenish-yellow. Vertex 
with apical black spot, disk very lightly marked with fuscous, pattern 
scarcely discernible, in some specimens entirely obliterated, leaving 
the vertex clear yellow with only the eyes, ocelli and apical spot dark. 
Pronotum without maculation, posterior disk yellowish-green. Scutellum 
with faint traces of maculations. Elytra yellowish-green. Face and 
all beneath pale straw color, immaculate or slightly marked. Veins 
usually pale in the females. 


Four females, from ‘‘Phoenix, Arizona,’’ American Mus. of 
Nat. Hist. Four females, ‘‘ Phoenix, Arizona, May 25, to June 8, 
1902,” H. G. Barber Collection. One female ‘‘S. Col.’’ One 
female, ‘‘Pecos, New Mexico, August 11, Ckll.,” and one 
female, ‘‘Santa Fe, New Mexico, Ckll.,’’ United States Nat. 
Mus. 

_seven males from ‘‘Glen, Sioux Co., Neb.,’’ H. G. Barber 
Collection and one male, ‘‘Col. Aug. Uhler,’’? U. S. Nat. Mus. 
Collection, may possibly be referred to this sub-species; they 
have a trifle more markings on the vertex than the females as 
above described and also the veins of their elytra are set off 
with a darker color. 


362 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol eve 


Female holo-type and two female para-types in The Amer- 
ican Museum of Natural History Collection. Male allo-type, 
four male para-types and two female para-types in H. G. 
Barber’s collection. Three female para-types in U. S. Nat. 
Mus. Coll. Three female and three male para-types in author’s 
collection. 


Cicadella hieroglyphica var. inscripta n. var. 


Shape and size similar to hieroglyphica. Face yellow, mottled with 
brownish. Vertex bright yellow, the disk washed with green, usual 
markings shining black, apical spot prominent. Pronotum dark 
bluish-green on disk, anterior margin more or less bright yellow, with 
a series of prominent black inscriptions across the entire width, which 
is vanishing in some specimens. Scutellum yellow with usual black 
margins. Elytra bright bluish-green with the margin of the claval 
suture yellowish-green, and the costal margins yellow to yellowish- 
green. Face mottled with testaceous. Venter and all beneath pale 
yellow, except the claws, which are dark, and a few fuscous spots on 
the sternum of some of the specimens. 


Five females, three labeled “Arizona (Col. Baker),’’ one 
‘Pecos ,New Mexico, Aug. 26 Ckll., Verbesina exauriculata,”’ 
(Probably food plant), one ‘‘Colorado Springs, Colo., July 21, 
(i. All fromthe Uz S.Nat.. Mus) Washineton Dr ©: 

Female holo-type and three female para-types in U. S. Nat. 
Mus. one female para-type in author’s collection. 


Cicadella confluens Uhler, 1862. 


When Uhler described this species he placed it in the genus 
Proconia and compared it with Proconia costalis, now known 
as Oncometopia lateralis Fabricius. From this it is evident that 
the insect he described appeared to him rather closer related to 
lateralis than to any of the Tettigonia species. It is not easy to 
say why he did this for his species lacks characters to admit it 
into this group, perhaps its appearance was rather coarse for 
Tettigonia. 

Ball, 1901, reduced Uhler’s confluens to a variety of hero- 
glyphica and described two other varieties, dolobrata and 
uhleri. After studying a considerable number of specimens I 
have come to the conclusion that confluens should be considered 
as a distinct species with whleri as a variety of it. These always 
possess the broadening and shortening of the vertex which Dr. 
Ball, 1901, refers to in the introduction of his paper. Besides 


1922] Olsen: Cuicadella of North America 363 


this, the front or face is considerably less convex and usually 
very pale with much less marking than is found in hieroglyphica 
and its varieties. Comparing it with hieroglyphica both in 
width and length, its head is broader and shorter in comparison 
to its total length; the lateral margins of vertex are straighter; 
vertex not quite so convex; elytra longer, mostly with a spotted 
pattern seldom displaying any stripes; general color dark 
brownish to bluish-black; markings on vertex quite different, 
the longitudinal bar of the T and the black margins bordering 
it are proportionately longer and thinner, appearing more 
drawn out and crowded together; the apical black spot is 
usually joined by the other black markings, sometimes barely 
separated; face is pale, sometimes slightly mottled; front 
broader, flatter, and not quite so strongly inflated. 

This species is undoubtedly confined to the extreme western 
states, specimens are determined from British Columbia, 
Washington, Idaho, and California. 

Certain forms of /Meroglyphica, especially from Colorado, 
(perhaps a new variety) very much resemble this species and 
have probably been the cause of confusion; they can, however, 
always be separated from it by the front being darker, more 
mottled, narrowed and more inflated or convex, and their 
shorter elytra and they do not have the slender black and light 
lines on the disk of the vertex. Some of these specimens in the 
National Museum collection where labeled with a Uhler ms. 
name. 


Cicadella confluens var. uhleri Ball, 1901. 


This variety compares well with Uhler’s confluens except in 
color, which is a grayish-green with bluish, greenish or brownish 
mottling, much lighter than typical confluens. Vertex, face, 
scutellum and costal margins of elytra usually brighter and 
more yellowish; black markings of vertex and scutellum are 
more delicate and fainter, sometimes vanishing; it also has 
longer elytra. 

Occurring practically with confluens, perhaps ranging more 
eastward toward the Rocky Mountains. Specimens at hand 
from Washington, California, Nevada and Colorado. These 
localities conform with Dr. Ball’s (1901) statement of distribu- 
tion which names the states in the Rocky Mountain region 
except Montana and follows westward to the coast. Tucker 


364 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


(1907) confirms the Colorado locality, whereas Gibson and 
Cogan (1915), if their determination is correct, extend the dis- 
tribution considerably eastward, giving the western half of the 
state of Missouri. 


Cicadella gothica Signoret, 1855. 


This widely distributed species, occurring practically over 
the entire continent, extends its range considerably northward 
over a wider stretch than any other member of the genus. It is 
common in all the north-eastern states extending into Canada. 
Provancher, 1889, lists it as Dzedrocephala hieroglyphica Say 
common at Cape Rouge, Ont. Mr. E. P. Van Duzee, 1914, 
reports it as abundant throughout the year at San Diego 
County, California. In the south-east it seems to cease at 
Tennessee, De Long, 1916; South Carolina, Metcalf, 1915; 
North Carolina, Olsen, 1918. 


Specimens at hand from Arizona vary slightly in size and 
markings from those of elsewhere: (a) about the same size but 
all markings on vertex obliterated or nearly so, elytra unicol- 
orous with veins faintly discernible, pale; (b) ranging consid- 
erably smaller in size, markings on vertex present and elytra 
of a deeper color with veins pale. 


It is readily separated from the hieroglyphica group by its 
designs of the vertex. The elytra of this species has the nervures 
pale. It does not exhibit as great variation as Mieroglyphica. 


Cicadella circellata Baker, 1898. 


It seems somewhat doubtful whether this name is valid or 
not. There is a good reason to believe that atropunctata Sig- 
noret is the same thing; his description fits tolerably well, 
although based on a specimen collected in Brazil, but the illus- 
tration is indeed very misleading and poor, as are many of the 
illustrations in the same work. However, this will need further 
study and especially of material from the south. Meantime, it 
may well be carried along as above. 

Lawson, 1920, is evidently of the same opinion since he in 
his recent paper on ‘‘The Cicadellide of Kansas”’ calls this 
species atropunctata Signoret. 


1922] Olsen: Cicadella of North America 3605 


Cicadella occatoria Say. 


Described by Say from Indiana. Fowler, 1900, gives a very 
fine color figure of this insect. It is variable to some extent in 
the amount of green and yellow color, also the markings show 
a gradation of various tints from reddish-brown to brown and 
black. 

Dr. Ball, 1901, lists Tettzgonia cempta Fowler as a straight 
synonym of this. I would hesitate that our common form. in 
the south-eastern states should be identified with Tettigonia 
compta because of Fowler’s description and particularly his 
color figure which is very well executed. Therefore, I would 
separate this form from occatoria and consider it a a sub-species 
at least, to which; I am sure, it is entitled. Dr. Ball, 1901, 
records it as common in Florida, Mississippi and Texas. To 
this: must be added Gibson and Cogan, 1905, common in 
eastern Missouri; De Long, 1916, specimens swept from various 
places in Tennessee; Metcalf, 1915, two localities in North 
Carolina; and Lathrop, 1917 and 1919, three localities in South 
Carolina. The type locality is in Indiana. Its range extends 
far to south of our fauna. 


Cicadella occatoria sub-species compta Fowler. 


Comparing this form with the true occatoria it will at once 
be seen to be of much redder color, but lacking the green. On 
the vertex the two outer of the four red vittae are much broad- 
ened on the reflexed portion of the face, and are subdivided into 
two or three narrower stripes on this place; they are really a 
continuation of a series of ten or twelve red arches on either side 
of the face, which extend up to this part of the vertex and take 
up with the stripes running back over the pronotum and 
clavus. The inner pair of vittee form a decided loop at a dis- 
tance of two-thirds from the base of the head and run back 
over the pronotum, scutellum and clavus. The fifth or central 
vitta commences on the pronotum and runs back over it and 
the scutellum. 


The red vittz of the elytra are much broadened and leave 
only narrow, yellow vitte between them. The apex of the 
elytra is hyaline and the characteristic ‘‘blackish tip with 
yellowish band”’ as mentioned in Say’s description, is wanting. 


366 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


This form seems to frequent more elevated and arid regions 
of Mexico, whereas typical occatoria is usually found along the 
south-eastern coast-line at comparatively low elevations. 

Six specimens in the collection of Mr. H. G. Barber come 
from Huachuca Mountain, Arizona, July 13 to 22, 1905. 


Cicadella dohrnii Sign. 


I have seen only a few examples of this species from Arizona 
and Mexico. It was described by Signoret from Mexico, and 
without doubt this is the insect which later was described by 
Baker, (1898, p. 286) as Tettigonia aurora and by Fowler 
(1900, p. 269, Pl. XVIII, Fig. 5) as delicata. This has been 
pointed out by Dr. Ball, 1901, who gives a very comprehensive 
description and an excellent figure by which it can be readily 
determined. 


Cicadella similis Walker, 1851. 


In comparing this species with the description of the genus 
Kolla Distant, 1908, I find that it does not agree very well. In 
the first place, the vertex is obtuse, rounded anteriorly rather 
than subconically narrowed; in the second place, the fovea 
next to the eye is scarcely discernible, variable, and amounts in 
many cases to a shallow depression which is so often seen in the 
genus Cicadella. 


The face has the lateral areas somewhat strongly striate, but 
this is also a character in most of the Cicadella species. The 
centrally longitudinal area is sometimes flattened, and some- 
times gently rounded, the dark and light arches meeting a 
narrow, light, central longitudinal vitta. The outline or profile 
of the face is markedly different from our species of both 
Cicadella and Kolla, bending rather abruptly just before the 
clypeus and the latter itself having quite a bend, these two 
bends producing a wavy appearance to the lower part of the 
profile of the head. Considering the above characters, I suggest 
that this species be placed in the genus Cicadella, where I think 
its color pattern, shape and general appearance will be in 
greater agreement. 


1922} Olsen: Cicadella of North America 367 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


Baker, C. F., 1898. New Tettigonine, with notes on others. Psyche VIII. 
No. 271. 

Ball, E. D., 1901. A Review of the Tettigonide of North America, North of 
Mexico. - Proce. Ta. Acad. Sci. VIIT. 

De Long, D. M., 1916. The Leafhoppers or Jassoidea of Tennessee. Tenn. St. 
Bd. But., Bull. 17. 

Distant, W. L., 1908. (a) The Fauna of British India, Rhynchota, IV. 

1908. (b) Rhynchotal Notes, XLIV, Homoptera, Jasside. “Ann, 
& Mag. Nat. Hist. Ser. 8, 1. 

Edwards, J. E., 1888. II. A Synopsis of British Homoptera-Cicadina. Trans. 
Ent. Soc. Lond., Part I. 

Ferrari, P.M., 1885. Rincoti omotteri raccolti nell "Italia Centrale e Meridionale. 
Bull] Soc. Ent. Ital. XVII. 

Fowler, W. W., 1900. Biologia Centrali-Americana. Rhynchota, Hemiptera- 
Homoptera, II, Part 1. 

Gibson, E. H. and Cogan, E. S., 1915. A preliminary list of the Jassoidea of 
Missouri with notes on species. Ohio Jl. Sci. XVI. 

Gilette, C. P. and Baker, C. F., 1895. A preliminary list of the Hemiptera of 
Colorado. Agr. Exp. Sta., Ft. Collins, Bull: 31, Tech. Ser. 1. 

Jensen-Haarup, A. C., 1915. Danmark’s Cikader, Fau. Flo. for Jyland. 

1920. Danmark’s Fauna, Cikader. (Handbook). 
Lathrop, F. H., 1917. A preliminary list of Cicadellide of South Carolina. Ohio 
Ji Sem Svar: 
1919. The Cicadellide or Leaf-hoppers of South Carolina. Bull. 
199, So. Car. Agri. Exp. Sta. of Clemson Agri. Col. 

Lawson, P. B., 1920. The Cicadellide of Kansas. Bull. Uni. Kan. XXI, No. 6. 
(Ser, Ball Xi No, 1): 

Linnaeus, C., 1758. Systema Nature, Edn. 10. 

1790. Systema Natur, Edn. 13. 

Metcalf, Z. P., 1915. A List of Homoptera of North Carolina. Jl. Elisha 
Mitchell Sci. Soc. XXXI, No. 1. 

Olsen, C. E., 1918. North, American Cicadellide in The American Museum of 
Natural History. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. XXXVIII, Art. 1. 

Onuki, S., 1901. Study of the Homoptera injurious to the rice fields. Special 
Report No. 10, Agr. Exp. Sta. Nihigahara, Tokio, Japan. (Text and Title 
in Japanese). 

Osborn, H., 1909. Notes on Gautemalan Hemiptera. Ohio Nat. IX, No. 5. 

Oshanin, B., 1907. Catalogue des Homopteres du gouv. de St. Petersbourg. 
Ann. Mus. Zool. Acad. Imp. Sci. St. Petersburg, XII. 

Provancher, Abbe, 1889. Petite Faune Entomologique du Canada. IIT. 

Sanders, J. G. and De Long, D. M., 1917. The Cicadellidz of Wisconsin. Ann. 
Ent. Soc. Am. X, No. 1. 

Say, T., 1831. Descriptions of new North American Hemipterous Insects belong- 

ing to the first family of the section Homoptera of Latreille: 
Jl. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. VI. 
1859. (Same in complete writing, by John L. Le Conte, M. D.) 

Signoret, V., 1854. Revue Des Tettigonide. Ann. Soc. Ent. Bie Setae. Ll. 

1855. Revue Des Tettigonide. Ann. Soc. Ent. Breer oy Lele 

Tucker, E. S., 1907. Some Results of desultory collecting of Insects in Kansas 
and Colorado. Kans. Univ. Sci. Bull. IV, No. 2. 

Uhler, P. R., 1862. Description of four species of Hemiptera collected by the 

North-Western Boundary Survey. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. 
Philax, Sorry, 

1876. List of Hemiptera of the region west of the Mississippi River, 
including those collected during the Hayden Exploration 
of 1873. Bull. U. S. Geol. & Geog. Sur., I. 

1878. On the Hemiptera collected by Dr. Elliot Coues) U.S. Ax 
in Dakota and Montana during 1873-74. U.S. Bull. Geol. 
& Geog. Surv. IV. 


368 


Van Duzee, E. P., 1903. 


Walker, F., 1851. 


Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


1909. 
1912. 
1914. 


1916. 
LOZ. 


Hemiptera of Beulah, New Mexico. Trans. Am. Ent. 
Soc. XXIX. 

Observation on some Hemiptera taken in Florida in the 
spring of 1908. Buli. Buff. Soc. Nat. Sci., IX. 

Synonomy of the Provancher Collection of Hemiptera. 
Can. Ent. XIV, No. 11: 

A preliminary list of the Hemiptera of San Diego County, 
Crees Trans. San. Diego Soc. Nat. Hist. II, 

on dE 

Check List of the Hemiptera of America,: North of 
Mexico. N. Y. Ent. Soc. (Separate publication). 

Catalogue of the Hemiptera of America, North of 
Mexico. Univ. Cal. Tech. Bull. II. 


List of Homoptera of the British Museum. III. 


Wirtner, P. M., 1904. A preliminary list of the Hemiptera of Western Penn- 
sylvania. Ann. Carn. Mus. III. 


Woodworth, C. W., 1887. 


Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 
Fig. 


NOP WN 


Jasside of Illinois. Bull. Ill. St. Lab. Nat. Hist. eae 


EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXXVI. 


Dorsal view of Cicadella multilineata Fowler. , 

Dorsal view of Cicadella hieroglyphica Say. 

Dorsal view of Cicadella hieroglyphica subsp. lutzi n. subsp. 
Dorsal view of Cicadella hieroglyphica subsp. barberi n. subsp. 
Dorsal view of Cicadella confluens Uhler. 

Dorsal view of Cicadella occatoria Say. 


Dorsal view of Cicadella similis Walker. ; 
a, front view of face; b, side view of head; c, apical half of elytra. 


Annals E,S. A. VoL. XV. Pirate XXXVI. 


C. E. Olsen 


NEW SYRPHIDA (DIPTERA) FROM MISSISSIPPI. 


By FRANK M. HULL 
Agricultural College, Miss. 


Mississippi is in a region that is as yet almost wholly unex- 
amined in regard to its dipterous fauna. The discovery of two 
very interesting new species of Syrphide from the trifling 
number that have thus far been collected in the state argues a 
rich return from collecting in the future. The writer wishes to 
express his appreciation to Mr. C. H. Curran, who has kindly 
verified his determinations, particularly of the Muicrodon. 


Microdon (Omegasyrphus) painteri, new species. 


Male: Face and front dark shining metallic bronze, of medium 
width and nearly parallel. Oral margin and cheeks shining black. 
Cheeks and posterior orbits white pilose. Pile of face and lower half 
of front white, on upper half of front and vertex brownish yellow. 
Marking the anterior third of front is a shallow grooved depression 
somewhat in the shape of a “Y” the upper arms of which are wide 
apart and reach to the eyes. Face projecting for about half of its width, 
beginning just below the eyes. Eyes bare. First joint of antennze 
reddish, darker at tip; second and third joints black. Third joint 
distinctly shorter than first and second combined, pointed at tip and 
approximately twice as long as broad. First and third joints about 
equal in length; second joint short. Arista scarcely as long as last 
joint, reddish orange, brownish and considerably thickened at base. 


Dorsum of thorax feebly shining bluish black; with five shining, 
purplish bronze stripes of which the middle one is very narrow and 
the lateral ones quite wide; these stripes merge into a similarly colored 
area both on the anterior end of the dorsum and just before the scu- 
tellum. Scutellum shining metallic; spines small and separated by 
a distance slightly greater than their length. Pleuree and humeri 
strongly purplish bronze. Pile of dorsum short and of a yellowish cast, 
that of pleurze longer and white. Squame pale yellowish. 


Abdomen: First segment dull brownish black, but little shining. 
Second widened and considerably depressed so that the lateral mar- 
gins have a much thickened and rounded appearance on the edges; 
a large indistinct triangle of dark golden brown which in some lights 
has a greenish reflection, its apex reaching the posterior margin, has its 
base along the anterior margin. The remainder of this segment and the 
rest of the abdomen light, slightly brownish red becoming a little 
darker on the fourth segment. Whole abdomen faintly shining; pile 


370 


1922] Hull: Syrphide From Mississippi 371 


or pubescence short, white, longer on the lateral margins and more 
noticeable on the third and fourth segments. Venter concolorous with 
the dorsum with the exception of the first segment which is blackish. 

Femora black, shining, with very short and sparsely white pile; 
apex of femora and trochanters reddish. Tuibiz reddish, piceous at 
their outer ends, covered with short abundant white pile; first joint 
of hind tarsus considerably enlarged. Wings hyaline with a dark brown- 
ish cloud in the middle on the anterior half of wing, smaller clouded 
areas following the veins closing first and second posterior cells and 
about the marginal and submarginal cells. Veins brown; stigma 
luteous. A stub of a vein extrudes half way across the first posterior 
cell at its middle. 

Female: Very similar to the male. All three joints of the antenne 
light yellowish brown, outer half of last joint grayish or blackish. 
Arista entirely reddish yellow. Front noticeably wider. The ground 
color of thorax appears more metallic and greenish. Scutellum more 
purplish bronze. The second segment lacks the brown triangle and is 
entirely reddish. 

Femora dark shining red. Tibia and tarsi light brownish red; pile 
of the former white, of the latter brownish yellow. Infuscated spots 
and veins of the wing smaller in extent. Ocelli bright shining red. 

Length: 10 mm. 


Holotype male and two paratype males taken in a cypress 
swamp on September 18, 1920, at Greenville, Miss., (F. M. 


Hull). Allotype female from College Station, Texas, September 
28, 1920, (H. J. Reinhard). 


Holotype and paratype in the collection of the author. 
Allotype in the collection of Mr. Reinhard. 


It gives me pleasure to name this species in honor of Mr. 
R. H. Painter who has been active in the collection of the 
Syrphid fauna of the region. 


Somula mississippiensis, new species. 


Male: Antennal process extraordinarily long and prominent; the 
distance from base above to tip being approximately half as long as 
the distance from the base above to the epistoma or twice the length 
of the process in Somula decora Macquart; yellow below, entirely black 
above, the black extending to the eyes, its margins straight. Antenne 
black; second and third joints covered with microscopic, light colored 
pubescence; arista yellowish red near base, blackish apically. Face 
below antennal process only slightly concave and a little convex on 
lower part; descending perpendicularly considerably below the eyes; 
shining pale yellow, with a black median stripe extending from the 
epistoma to half the length of the antennal process on its lower surface. 
Cheeks shining black. Front black, almost destitute of the rather long, 
yellow pile that sparsely covers the occiput and the posterior orbits 


372 Annals Entomological Society of America [Vol. XV, 


below. On each side of the antennal process, with their bases against 
the eyes, are two triangular areas with microscopic, almost white 
pubescence. 

Thorax a faintly shining black with five, dorsal, narrow, obscure 
metallic golden green stripes, merging into similarly colored area both 
at the anterior end and just before the scutellum, which gives to the 
black of the thorax a greenish cast. Scutellum shining; entirely metallic 
greenish black. Pile of medium length, rather thick and yellowish. 
Humeri opaque yellow, yellow pilose. Mesopleure black, with an oval 
yellow spot, yellow pilose. Squamez yellow. 


First segment of abdomen black, feebly shining. Second, third and 
fourth segments black, nearly opaque, each with a pair of opaque 
yellow spots and a shining, metallic, brassy band on posterior margin. 
Dorsum of abdomen short yellow pilose throughout. The posterior 
band of second segment is uniform in width, does not quite reach the 
lateral margin but turns up along the sides and reaches the anterior 
margin of the segment. The metallic part of the third segment is sim- 
ilar except that the posterior band is much wider in the middle and 
narrower on the sides. On the fourth it covers practically the whole of 
the segment and the black is limited on the posterior side to a narrow 
band encircling the spots. Fifth segment wholly shining metallic. 
Hypopygium feebly shining brownish or reddish. The spots of the 
abdomen are well separated, do not reach the lateral margin and are 
much smaller and more transverse than those of Somula decora. Those 
of the second segment are oblong and slightly narrowed on the inner 
end, and not quite twice as long as wide. Those of the third segment 
are not pyriform but are oblong, nearly three times as long as wide, 
slightly concave on the anterior and convex on the posterior side. The 
spots of the fourth segment are similar but somewhat smaller and a 
little more concave. A small yellow oblique triangle has its base on the 
anterior margin, touching lateral margin of the second segment, and a 
much smaller but similar pair of spots on the third segment. Venter 
shining black with yellow posterior margins to the segments, those of 
the first and fourth being widest. Legs light brownish yellow and 
covered with thick yellow pile. Hind femora along the inside with a 
number of short black bristles like hairs. 


Last three joints of all the tarsi blackened; with blackish pile. 
Wings dark brown before: the fourth longitudinal vein, becoming 
yellow near the base, hyaline posteriorly. 

Female: Very similar to the male. The posterior metallic band of 
the second segment is nearly wanting, the yellow triangles in the 
anterior corners of the second are smaller, those of the third segment 
obsolete. The hind femora lack the black bristle like hairs on the inside. 
The black facial stripe extends narrowly to the tip of the antennal 
process; in one male paratype this is also true. 

Length, including the antennal process: 17 mm. 


1922] Hull: Syrphide From Mississippi 373 


Curiously enough, the first specimen of this magnificent 
species, a male, was taken at Agricultural College, Mississippi, 
May 6, 1920, dead but in perfect condition, from a cobweb! 
On March 3, 1921, a fragmentary but unmistakably identical 
specimen was taken from a cobweb in the same locality. 
Subsequently three specimens, two males and one female, have 
been taken by Mr. R. H. Smith on flowers of Crategus, on 
April 2, 1922, at the college. 

This species will be at once distinguished from S. decora 
Macquart, by its unusually long antennal process, its black 
facial stripe and the shape and configuration of the abdominal 
spots besides minor differences. 


Types in the collection of the author. 


NOTES. 


Among the papers being published as reports of the Barbados 
Antigua Expedition of the Iowa State University* there have appeared 
two on insects which will be of interest to Entomologists. The first is 
a paper by Professor Dayton Stoner, on the Scutelleroidea, pages 3 to 17, 
with three plates. Seventeen species are listed with careful notes on 
distribution and ecology, and while most of the species are common 
to the West Indian regions, these records give valuable data as to the 
local distribution. The report on the Orthoptera and Dermaptera, 
pages 19 to 44, by Mr. A. N. Caudell, includes detailed records for a num- 
ber of interesting species, the distribution of which has been much 
extended, and also descriptions of four new species. 


The report of the proceedings of the 4th Entomological Meeting at 
Pusa, February 7th to 12th, 1921, edited by Bainbridge Fletcher, 
Imperial Entomologist, like the preceding reports for 1918, 1919 and 
1920, contains a wealth of material on the Entomological work in 
India. The papers on Pink Boll Worm, by E. Ballard, and the one on 
Winter Spraying against the Mango Hopper and also the article on 
the use of Bichloride of Mercury, in the Destruction of Mosquito 
Larvee, by Mr. Sen, will be of particular interest to American Entomol- 
ogists, the first on account of the present fight against the dispersal of 
the species in our cotton states—the latter two as related to control 


measures for leafhoppers and mosquitoes. 
HO) 


*University of lowa Studies in Natural History, Vol. X, No. 1, March, 1922. 


INDEX OF VOLUME XV. 


Acarina, Phylogeny of, 213 
Acinaca, 146. 
Acinaca lurida, 146. 
Aedes canadensis, 159. 
stimulans, 159. 
Ainslie, Geo. G., Article by, 125. 
Alexander, C. P., Article by, 223. 
Amphineurus senex, 225. 
Anopheles punctipennis, 162. 
quadrimaculatus, 161. 
walkeri, 163. 
Aridia, 147. 
Aridia compressa, 147 
erecta, 148. 
Auchenorynchous, Homoptera, 201. 


Ball, E. D., Article by, 137. 
Barbiellinia, 121. 
Barbiellinia hirta, 122. 
Barnes, Wm., Article by, 89. 
Bezzi, Professor M., Article by, 117. 
Blattoidea, 41. 
Brachyopa basilaris, 255. 
cynops, 244, 254. 
daeckei, 246. 
diversa, 244. 
flavescens, 248. 
gigas, 255. 
media, 247. 
nigricauda, 255. 
notata, 251, 255. 
perplexa, 249, 255. 
rufiabdominalis, 246, 255. 
vacua, 245, 254. 
Branch, Hazel Elizabeth, Article by, 
256. 
Brolemann, Henry W., Article by, 281. 


Chauliodes pectinicornis, 169. 
Chiromyza, 119. 
Chiromyza fuscana, 120. 
nigra, 121. 
vittata ochracea, 120. 
vittata viridis, 120. 
Chiromyza Wied, Dipterous Genus, 117 
Chrysopa oculata, 173. 
Cicadella, Studies of North American 
species, 353. 
Cicadella circellata, 364. 
confluens, 362. 
confluens var uhleri, 363. 
dohrnii, 366. 
gothica, 364. 
hieroglyphica, 357. 
hieroglyphica var dolobrata, 359. 
hieroglyphica var inscripta, 362. 


hieroglyphica sub-sp barberi, 361. 
hieroglyphica sub-sp lutzi, 360. 
marathonensis, 356. 
multilineata, 356. 
occatoria, 365. 
occatoria sub sp compta, 365. 
similis, 366. 
viridis, 355. 

Coleoptera, Study of Wing Venation, 

191. 


Coleoptera, Wing Venation of, 328. 

Crambinae, Contributions to Knowl- 
edge of, II, 125. 

Crambus laqueatellus clemens, 125. 

Crane-Flies, from New Zealand, 223. 

Culicella dyari, 157. 

Curran, Howard, Article by, 239. 


Dermaptera, 12. 
Deserta, 141. 
Deserta bipunctata, 143. 
obesa, 148. 
obscura, 142. 
Desert Leafhoppers, Review of, 137. 
Dicranomyia sperata, 224. 
subviridis, 223. 


Embiidina, 16. 
Ephemerida, 11. 
Ewing, H. E., Article by, 213. 


Flint, W. P., Article by, 154. 
Folsom, Justus W., Article by, 181. 
Forbes, W. T. M., Article by, 328. 
Frost, S. W., Article by, 164. 


Gall Mites, Phylogeny of, 213. 
Graham, S. A., Article by, 191. 
Grylloblattoidea, 39. 
Griswold, Grace H., Article by, 184. 
Gynoplistia cladophora, 229. 

harrisi, 231. 

lyrifera, 226. 

spinigera, 228. 

spinicalcar, 230. 

splendens, 233. 

unimaculata, 232. 


Hammerschmidtia, 253. 
Hammerschmidtia ferruginea, 253. 
Hartzell, Albert, Article by, 137. 
Hessian Fly, Emergence of, 177. 
Homoptera, Genitalia, 201. 

Hull, Frank M., Article by, 370. 
Hylorus, 118. 


or 


376 


Inopus, 118. 
Isoptera, 49. 


Kershaw, J. C., Article by, 201. 


Larrimer, Walter H., Article by, 177. 
Lepidoptera, Generic names in order, 
89 


Lindsay, A. W., Article by, 89. 


Macromastix atroflava, 235. 
flavoscapus, 234. 
hudsoniana, 237. 
intermedia, 236. 
lunata fuscolatera, 236. 
Mansonia perturbans, 161. 
Mantoidea, 47. 
Matheson, Robert, Article by, 157. 
Mecoptera, Head and Mouth-parts of, 
310. 
Mellisodes, 181. 
Metcalf, C. L., Proc. 100. 
Microdon painteri, 370. 
Micromus posticus, 171. 
Mosquito, New Records, 157. 
Muir, F., Article by, 201. 


Neuroptera, Hatching, 169. 
Nomophila noctuella, Studies of, 154. 


Odonata, 51. 
Olsen, C. E., Article by, 353. 
Orgamara, 139. 
Orgamara acuta, 140. 
reducta, 140. 
Orgerini, Review of, 137. 
Orgerius, 143. 
condordus, 146. 
minor, 146. 
pajaronius, 145. 
thyparus, 144, 145. 
var. clitellus, 145. 
ventosus, 145. 
Orthoptera, 18. 
Orthopteroid Insects, Terminal Struc- 
tures of, 1. 


Index of Volume XV 


Otanes, Faustino Q., Article by, 310. 
Oyster-Shell Scale, Are there two 
species of, 184. 


Paeromopus, 287. 
chamberlini, 298. 
!ysiopetalinus, 287. 
Paraiulids (Myriapods), on female, 281. 
Paraiulus, 290. 
ellipticus, 297. 
immaculatus, 292. 
impressus, 294. 
pennsylvanicus, 291. 
tiganus, 290. 
venustus, 295. 
Phasmoidea, 36. 
Phytophaga destructor, 177. 
Plecoptera, 13. 
Prostigmata classification of order, 213. 


Shannon, R. C., Article by, 157. 
Smith, Roger C., Article by, 169. 
Somula mississippiensis, 371. 

Syrphid Genera, Hammerschmidtia, 
and Brachyopa in Canada, 239. 
Syrphidae, new species from Missis- 

sippi, 370. . 


Tetralonia and Melissodes, Pollination 
of Red Clover by, 181. 

Ticidia, 149. 

Ticidia, cingulara, 150. 

Timodema, 148. 

Timodema miracula, 149. 

Timonidia, 151. 

Timonidia solitaria, 151. 

Tipulidae, 223. 

Tmetocera Ocellana, Ecdysis in, 164. 

Trichoptera, Internal Anatomy of, 256. 


Walker, E. M., Article By, 1. 
Wyeomyia smithii, 163. 


Yucanda, 141. 
Yucanda albida, 141. 


Zoraptera, 50. 


NOTICE TO MEMBERS AND CONTRIBUTORS. 


The Annals of the Entomological Society of America, pub- 
lished by the Society quarterly, includes the Proceedings of the 
Annual meetings and such papers as may be selected by the 
Editorial Board. 


Papers may be submitted to any member of the Editorial 
Board and should be as nearly as possible in the form desired as 
final, preferably typewritten, and illustrations must be finished 
complete ready for reproduction. Plates must not exceed 5x 7 
inches unless intended tofold. In general, papers to be accepted 
must be original, complete and previously unpublished and, 
except in connection with the proceedings, it will not be the 
policy to publish preliminary announcements or notes. Authors 
will be allowed fifty reprints gratis and additional copies at cost 
to the Society. 


The Managing Editor is provided with the most recent 
address of all paid-up members on record in the Secretary’s 
office for mailing the numbers of the Annals and members 
failing to receive their numbers should present their complaint 
to the Managing Editor within four months from the date of 
the mailing of the issue. After that time the numbers will 
be furnished only at the regular published rate. 


Requests for information as to membership and the annual 
dues of members should be sent to the Secretary-Treasurer, 
Dr. C. L. Metcatr, Natural History Building, University of 
Illinois, Urbana, IIl. 


Communications relating to the ANNALS, and all dudes for 
separate copies, reprints and back numbers should be addressed 
to the Managing Editor. 


SUBSCRIPTION RATES. 


- The regular annual subscription price for the ANNALS is in 
the United States, Cuba, Porto Rico, Hawaii and Mexico, $3.00; 
Canada, $3.50; other countries, $4.00. Checks, drafts or money 
orders should be drawn payable to ANNALS ENTOMOLOGICAL 
SocIETY OF AMERICA, and addressed to HERBERT OSBORN, 
State University, Columbus, Ohio, U.S. A. 


CONTENTS OF THIS NUMBER. 


BROLEMANN, HENRY W.—Notes on Female Paraiulids 
(Myriapods) with Description of a New Species... 281 


OTANES, Faustino Q.—Head and Mouth-Parts of 


UA UST 0) 91 0st SEARS OI AD a el Marah Di A AON) 310 
Forses, WM. T. M.—The Wing-Venation of the 
Ra) Foray 91 yo ae MG Me a, EC RUNES Da Bats Ey AT 328 


OLsEN, Curis E.—Studies of the Species in the Genus 
Cicadella latreille (Homoptera) of North America, 


INGTER (OE Mies ICG bi eS cl aA nN au ae an oi 353 
Huit, FrRanK M.—New Syrphide (Diptera) from 
NESSISSIDDE NAC es eR Sara peat Sa 370 


THE THOMAS SAY FOUNDATION 


A permanent committee of the Entomological Society of America, 
engaged in publishing a series of memoirs on 
North American entomology, offers 


Vol. I. Sarcophaga and Allies in North America 
By J. M. Atpric# 
304 pp., octavo, with 16 plates. Price in cloth binding, postpaid, $3.00. 


_ Address, Dr. E. D. BALL, 
Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. C. 


BACK VOLUMES 


Of the Annats oF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SocIETY oF AMERICA may 
be secured from the office of the Managing Editor and new members 
of the Society who may wish to complete a set are advised to secure - 
the earlier volumes while there is still a supply on hand and the price 
is kept at the original subscription rate. 


PRICE LIST OF PUBLICATIONS 


WAnsals, \Vols.\f to XIV, complete, each Weal iyo 8 RM Sate Nase $3.00 
Annals, Separate Parts, except as below, each.............. ccc e eee e eens 1.00 
Annals, Vote) Farid TT) Part) 3 aabckin sisi a cies hc tiie k el Hehniaict ah ieietereiete eee -50 
Aainale.) Voli EV; Pat 4; Gaede es hes ee ao NR ae 1.50 


Address HERBERT OsBorn, Managing Editor, 
ANNALS ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 
Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. 


—— = 


* Ai ven 


on we y 
uy Ai i Ah 


i. 


ae 
ae 
“A 


Pago li 
\ iy 
gay Sate 


F ih i i 
: ., lh ft 


| 


bf tl oe 


»\ 
of 


Wy a <*) 
aS 5 


ae > 


iN 


a 


Ned 
e 

— [PES 

TN RPE GIO NN ‘Np ; 
CAEN B 4, 4 IH ¢ 2 \ a 5: 
FA eS a) 
i 4 St : : 
t-t-2th \3 = 
an Oa. ‘ 
FEE ‘ 

TS | 
Lowe 5 | 


——————— 


r yf 


at 


i 
@ %b suunll 


PM . | 
: PSR 
| Jes 
S87 . 


LON, 
ea 
Ay 


we 
AG 
“a! 


ine 
FF VSN 


SR 
pi 


EA 


4 md. 

GE 
—_ 
= 


nate 


ns 
i. fae 
» % ce 
~ Ay < i 
, ; 


ae hi a on 
Me a 4%; Bay i “th yi 


cee dienes > 
» Op = ie 
4%, 
\ f io iN \ 
gate MAM dil 


Hh 


9088 00844 6148