Skip to main content

Full text of "Annals of the South African Museum = Annale van die Suid-Afrikaanse Museum"

See other formats


VOLUME 69 PART 9 APRIL 1976 ISSN 0303-2515 


OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN - 
— 


tae 


CAPE TOWN 


INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS 


1. MATERIAL should be original and not published elsewhere, in whole or in part. When 
accepted, copyright becomes the property of the Trustees of the South African Museum. 


2. LAYOUT should be as follows: 


(a) Masthead to consist of 
Title: informative but concise, without abbreviations and not including the names of new genera or species 
Author’s(s’) name(s) 
Address(es) of author(s) (institution where work was carried out) 
Number of illustrations (figures, enumerated maps and tables, in this order) 
(b) Abstract of not more than 200 words, intelligible to the reader without reference to the text 
(c) Table of contents giving hierarchy of headings and subheadings 
(d) Introduction 
(e) Subject-matter of the paper, divided into sections to correspond with those given in table of contents 
(f) Summary, if paper is lengthy 
(g) Acknowledgements 
(h) References 
(i) Abbreviations, where these are numerous 


3. MANUSCRIPT, to be submitted in triplicate, should be typewritten, double spaced with 
2,5 cm margins all round. Tables and legends for illustrations should be typed separately, 
their positions indicated in the text. All pages should be numbered consecutively. 

Major headings of the paper are centred capitals; first subheadings are shouldered small 
capitals; second subheadings are shouldered italics; third subheadings are indented, shouldered 
italics. Further subdivisions should be avoided, as also enumeration (never roman numerals) 
of headings and abbreviations. 

Only generic and specific names should be underlined to indicate italics; all other marking 
up should be left to editor and publisher. 


4. ILLUSTRATIONS should be reducible to a size not exceeding 12 x 18 cm (19 cm including 
legend); originals larger than 35 x 47 cm should not be submitted; photographs should be 
final size. A metric scale should appear with all illustrations, otherwise magnification or reduc- 
tion should be given in the legend. 

All illustrations, whether line drawings or photographs, should be termed figures (plates 
are not printed; half-tones will appear in their proper place in the text) and numbered in a 
single series. Items of composite figures should be designated by capital letters; lettering of 
figures is not set in type and should be in lower-case letters. 

The number of the figure should be marked on the back of each illustration. 


5. REFERENCES cited in text and synonymies should all be included in the list at the end of 
the paper, using the Harvard System (ibid., idem., loc. cit., op. cit. are not acceptable): 


(a) Author’s name and year of publication given in text, e.g.: 


‘Smith (1969) describes .. .’ 

‘Smith (1969: 36, fig. 16) describes .. .’ 

‘As described (Smith 1969a, 19696; Jones 1971)...’ 
“As described (Haughton & Broom 1927)...’ 

‘As described (Haughton et al. 1927)...’ 


Note: no comma separating name and year 
pagination indicated by colon, not p. 
names of joint authors connected by ampersand 
et al. in text for more than two joint authors, but names of all authors given in list of references 


(b) Full references at the end of the paper, arranged alphabetically by names, chronologically 
within each name, with suffixes a, b, etc. to the year for more than one paper by the same 
author in that year, e.g. Smith (1969a, 19694) and not Smith (1969, 1969a). 


For books give title in italics, edition, volume number, place of publication, publisher. 

For journal article give title of article, title of journal in italics (abbreviated according to the World list of 
scientific periodicals. 4th ed. London: Butterworths, 1963), series in parentheses, volume number, part 
number (only if independently paged) in parentheses, pagination (first and last pages of article). 


Examples (note capitalization and punctuation) 


BULLOUGH, W. S. 1960. Practical invertebrate anatomy. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan. 

FISCHER, P.-H. 1948. Données sur la résistance et de le vitalité des mollusques. —J. Conch., Paris 88: 100-140. 

FISCHER, P.-H., DuvaL, M. & Rarry, A. 1933. Etudes sur les échanges respiratoires des littorines.— Archs 
Zool. exp. gén. 74: 627-634. 

Konn, A. J. 1960a. Ecological notes on Conus (Mollusca: Gastropoda) in the Trincomalee region of Ceylon. — 
Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (13) 2: 309-320. 

Konn, A. J. 1960. Spawning behaviour, egg masses and larval development in Conus from the Indian Ocean. — 
Bull. Bingham oceanogr. Coll. 17 (4): 1-51. 

THIELE, J. 1910. Mollusca: B. Polyplacophora, Gastropoda marina, Bivalvia. In: SCHULTZE, L. Zoologische 
und anthropologische Ergebnisse einer Forschungsreise im westlichen und zentralen Siid-Afrika 4: 269-270. 
Jena: Fischer. — Denkschr. med.-naturw. Ges. Jena 16: 269-270. 


continued inside back cover) 


ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM 
ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM 


Volume 69 Band 
April 1976 April 
Part 9 Deel 


£ 
Ita, 


> 
a S S 
Ta» 


THE PLIOCENE FOSSIL OCCURRENCES IN 
‘FE? QUARRY, 
LANGEBAANWEG, SOUTH AFRICA 


By 


Q. B. HENDEY 


Cape Town Kaapstad 


The ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM 


are issued in parts at irregular intervals as material 
becomes available 


Obtainable from the South African Museum, P.O. Box 61, Cape Town 8000 


Die ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM 


word uitgegee in dele op ongereelde tye na beskikbaarheid 
van stof 


Verkrygbaar van die Suid-Afrikaanse Museum, Posbus 61, Kaapstad 8000 


OUT OF PRINT/UIT DRUK 


1, 2(1, 3, 5-8), 3(1-2, 4-5, t.—p.i.), 5(1-3, 5, 7-9), 
6(1, t—p.i.), 71-4), 8, 911-2), 10(1), 
11(1-2, 5, 7, t.—p.i.), 15(5), 24(2), 27, 31(1-3), 33 


Price of this part/Prys van hierdie deel 
R3,20 


Trustees of the South African Museum (© _ Trustees van die Suid-Afrikaanse Museum 
1976 


ISBN 0 949940 88 7 


Printed in South Africa by In Suid-Afrika gedruk deur 
The Rustica Press, Pty., Ltd., Die Rustica-pers, Edms., Bpk., 
Court Road, Wynberg, Cape Courtweg, Wynberg, Kaap 


THE PLIOCENE FOSSIL OCCURRENCES IN ‘E’ QUARRY, 
LANGEBAANWEG, SOUTH AFRICA 


By 


Q. B. HENDEY 
South African Museum, Cape Town 


(With 6 figures and 4 tables) 


[MS. accepted 27 November 1975] 


ABSTRACT 


The Pliocene Varswater Formation in the vicinity of Langebaanweg, Cape Province, is 
comprised of three main units, now named the Gravel, Quartzose Sand and Pelletal Phosphorite 
Members. The lowest unit in the succession, the Gravel Member, has yielded a largely marine 
fauna, including fifteen shark species, incorporated in rocky and sandy beach deposits. The 
principal source of fossils, the Quartzose Sand Member, was laid down in a variety of 
depositional environments in and near an estuary. The economically important unit, the 
Pelletal Phosphorite Member, is fossiliferous in a relatively limited area which was situated in 
the immediate vicinity of the river mouth. The fossils from the deposits overlying the Gravel 
Member represent a wide variety of marine, freshwater and terrestrial invertebrates and 
vertebrates. About seventy-five mammalian species are recorded, including a few belonging to 
groups not previously recorded from Africa. 


CONTENTS 

PAGE 
Introduction : : ; : 4 PALS) 
Geology. 2 : ; : a) Alls) 
Depositional environments . go = PDP 
Fauna . , ; : : ; ; 231 
Flora . 5 : ; 2 ; » 243 
Dating . ‘ : : : : . 243 
Conclusions : ; ; : . 245 
Acknowledgements . : : . 245 
References . F , ; : . 246 

INTRODUCTION 


Large-scale production of phosphate from deposits on the farm Langeberg 
near Langebaanweg, Cape Province, was commenced in 1953 and several years 
later the presence of fossils in these deposits was reported (Singer 1961). Initially 
few fossils of good quality were collected, but prospecting revealed the presence 
of highly fossiliferous deposits south of a small open-cast mine, ‘E’ Quarry. 
During 1964 these deposits were exposed in a trench about 240 metres long, 
120 metres wide and ranging in depth from 2 to 30 metres (Fig. 1). Soon after 
the 1964 excavations were commenced it became apparent that the deposits 
would yield well-preserved fossils in large quantities. Mining of ‘E’ Quarry (the 
New Varswater Mine) has been continuous since then and although the number 


215 


Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 69 (9), 1976: 215-247, 6 figs, 4 tables, 


216 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM 


of fossils recovered has varied from year to year, the original expectations have 
been fulfilled. Certainly no other recorded African fossil occurrence of Pliocene 
age has produced so large an assemblage of specimens representing so wide a 
variety of species. 

During 1968 the South African Museum commenced an investigation of the 
fossiliferous deposits exposed in ‘E’ Quarry, this project following on from a 
similar undertaking directed for a period of ten years by R. Singer of the 
University of Chicago. The first phase of the Langebaanweg project had also 
taken into account the mined-out occurrences at ‘C’ Quarry on the farm 
Langeberg and Baard’s Quarry on the farm Muishondsfontein. The fossils from 
these sites are limited in both quality and quantity and there are some still 
unresolved problems relating to their geological associations. 

Several publications have resulted from the second phase of the Langebaan- 
weg project, including reviews (Hendey 1970a; 1973; 1974a), accounts of the 
geology (Tankard 1974a; 19746; 1975), discussions on dating (Hendey 19706; 
1972a; 19746), as well as descriptions of some of the fossils recovered (e.g. 
Simpson 1971; Kensley 1972; Gentry 1974). 

The geological study of the ‘E’ Quarry deposits, which has now been 
largely completed, formed part of a broadly-based investigation of late Cenozoic 
deposits in the south-western and southern Cape Province, and was undertaken 
independently of the palaeontological study, although the two have been 
mutually complementary. 

Recently research on the fossils from Langebaanweg has decreased, although 
there has been an increase in the amount of material collected. The latter 
development is a direct result of changes in the mining programme. The expected 
back-filling of ‘E’ Quarry (Hendey 1973) was commenced during 1974 and 
collecting was accelerated in those areas to be covered by new mine dumps. In 
addition, the mining company (Chemfos Limited) removed a large quantity of 
fossiliferous deposit from one of the threatened areas (East Stream, see Fig. 1) 
and this is being screened by the first permanent field assistants on site. The 
nature of the present undertaking is being further influenced by the fact that 
during 1975 mining of the last of the phosphatic deposits known to be highly 
fossiliferous was commenced. Until recently these deposits were not scheduled 
to be mined until about 1990. 

Since its inception, the prime object of the present phase of the Langebaan- 
weg project has been the recovery and identification of fossils, with the collecting 
being as comprehensive as possible. The recent changes in the mining programme 
have added urgency to this aspect of the undertaking since leisurely collecting 
and excavation over certain areas of the mine are no longer possible and the 
areas thus affected will increase with the passage of time. Many of the specimens 
still in the deposits will be lost if they are not salvaged promptly. In addition, 
the volume of fossiliferous deposit elsewhere is being steadily reduced by the 
mining and although some is likely to remain indefinitely, technical difficulties 
may make it inaccessible to further exploitation. The termination of active field 


217 


PLIOCENE FOSSIL OCCURRENCES IN LANGEBAANWEG, SOUTH AFRICA 


-pourwy YL °C 


‘samou Q¢z Ajoyeuxoidde sul] apeog *AIIeNd .O, 3no 
UONVAVSXS POG] BY} JO JU9}xo oJeUUTXOIdde o}edIPUI g PUNOIe sour] padding “pag yeag “D “SeE Pog Jo somnsodxy *g “WiReg seq “V 
‘(PL6t A[ng) Somuveqesuey ‘ArIenO 


A, JO MOIA [BLOW “] “SIA 


218 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM 


work at the site in the not too distant future has now become a distinct 
possibility. 

The collecting of fossils could be expedited by being more selective, but as 
far as possible this approach 1s avoided, mainly because it would adversely affect 
that part of the undertaking concerned with the recording of the nature of the 
fossil occurrences. This aspect of the investigation already suffers because of its 
lower priority rating. It is hoped that eventually an analysis of specimens from 
any given area in terms of species and body part representation, together with 
their condition and associations, will provide information on environments of 
deposition, the taphonomy of the fossils and aspects of the ecology of the area 
at the time of deposition. Some information of this nature is already available. 

Although more time has recently been spent on the collecting of fossils and 
directly related technical matters, some progress has been made in the 
palaeontological research, and the present report updates some of the 
information and opinions previously recorded. 


GEOLOGY 


The phosphatic and fossiliferous deposits exposed in ‘E’ Quarry make up 
what is now termed the Varswater Formation (Hendey 1974a; Tankard 1975). 
This formation is Pliocene in age and it is underlain by the Miocene Saldanha 
Formation (Tankard in press). The overlying deposits, informally termed the 
‘surface bed’, are largely, or entirely Pleistocene and Holocene in age. The 
Varswater Formation is comprised of three main units which were referred to 
by a variety of names in earlier publications. The member names used in the 
present report (Table 1) are those which are now considered most appropriate 
(A. J. Tankard pers. comm.), while those of the beds are purely informal and 
likely to be modified at a later date. The Gravel and Pelletal Phosphorite 
Members are both unequivocally described by their names, but the name of the 
Quartzose Sand Member refers to the dominant lithological element. This 
member also includes horizons of carbonaceous sand and clay (the ‘peat bed’, 
Fig. 1), clayey sands and silt. The non-geographic names of the members are 
justified in terms of Section 3.10(d) of the South African Code of Stratigraphic 
Terminology and Nomenclature (1971: 118). 

Since Tankard (1975) has described the Varswater Formation in detail, the 
only other comments on the geology of ‘E’ Quarry which are included here are 
those which have a bearing on the palaeontology of the deposits. 

The Quartzose Sand Member is the most highly fossiliferous of the three 
units, while the Pelletal Phosphorite Member is poorly fossiliferous, except for 
an area still exposed of the west wall of the mine (‘bed 3a’, Fig. 1). There are 
only limited exposures of the Gravel Member in a few areas of the mine and 
relatively little attention has been paid to this unit during the current phase of 
the Langebaanweg project. 


PLIOCENE FOSSIL OCCURRENCES IN LANGEBAANWEG, SOUTH AFRICA 219 


TABLE | 


Stratigraphy of the ‘E’ Quarry exposures of the Varswater Formation 


| Present report 
| Hendey (1974) | Tankard (1975) 
| MEMBERS BEDS 
beds 3aS & 3aN 
| Pelletal Pelletal (fossiliferous) 
= | Bed 3 Phosphorite Phosphorite and other un- 
e | Member Member named beds 
Er BAG NIE eh oe a 
| | Fluvial Quartzose tidal mud _ flat 
2 | Bed 2 | Sand Sand bed, peat bed 
x | Member Member and other un- 
> named beds 
2 | (fossiliferous) 
= | 
=a | Beach Gravel — 
| Bed 1 | Gravel Member 
| | Member 


Over most of ‘E’ Quarry the three members of the Varswater Formation 
are readily identifiable. The Gravel Member is always unmistakable, although 
the sandy element of this member may on occasion have been regarded as part 
of the overlying Quartzose Sand Member. Recognition of the Pelletal Phospho- 
rite Member has, for the most part, not been difficult, although its lower limit 
has not always been clearly defined. The problems encountered in recognizing 
the lower limit of this member have been due to a variety of factors. Theoretically 
the mining is cut off at the base of the Pelletal Phosphorite Member, although in 
practice this is impossible and irregularities on the floor of the mine do not 
necessarily reflect the nature of the boundary between the Pelletal Phosphorite 
and Quartzose Sand Members. In most areas the mining has actually extended 
into the latter unit where the exposed surface may be contaminated and obscured 
by spillage from the excavator and slumping of deposit from the vertical mine 
faces. Furthermore, the Quartzose Sand Member was truncated prior to the 
deposition of the Pelletal Phosphorite and where it is very thin it has been 
difficult or impossible to recognize. In certain critical areas the deposits of the 
two members are superficially similar and although detailed sediment analyses 
would no doubt resolve the issue in problematical instances, no such analyses 
have been undertaken. 

From the preceding comments it should be clear that difficulties have centred 
largely on the identification of the upper and lower limits of the Quartzose Sand 
Member. Added to this is the fact that this member is the most complicated unit 
in the succession in terms of lithology and the variable character of the deposits 
has itself led to some confusion in the past. The sometimes striking differences 


220 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM 


TABLE 2 


The stratigraphy of the East Stream and peat areas of ‘E’ Quarry 


EAST STREAM PEAT AREA 
PELLETAL Phosphatic sand Phosphatic sand 
= PHOSPHORITE | (? non-fossiliferous) (? non-fossiliferous) 
fe) MEMBER | 
< | 
3 | Silt 
2 QUARTZOSE (invertebrates common) 
re SAND Quartzose sand J- -------------- 
5 MEMBER (vertebrates common) Peat 
2 | (vertebrates common) 
“4 
S GRAVEL Sand & gravel | Sand & gravel 
MEMBER | (marine fossils common) | (marine fossils common) 
| 


in the nature of the Quartzose Sand Member are illustrated by examples of the 
‘E’ Quarry succession given in Table 2. 

The difficulty experienced in identifying the units of the Varswater Forma- 
tion has resulted in some of the fossils collected being of doubtful provenance. 
In this connection it should also be noted that before the basic three-unit 
succession was recognized in 1969, little or no data on the source of specimens 
was recorded and the provenance of many specimens collected before that date 
may never be known. The same often applies in the case of specimens picked up 
by mine workers. Although the problem of unprovenanced material is not as 
serious as it might have been, it is an unfortunate complication in the 
palaeontological investigation. 

In the faunal lists given later, records of unknown or uncertain origin are 
excluded. The source of most of the more significant specimens from ‘E’ Quarry 
is well documented and all the species identified to date are represented by at 
least one specimen of known provenance. 

The characteristics of the units comprising the Varswater Formation are 
accounted for by the sequence of events which occurred during deposition of the 
formation. These events have a direct bearing on the interpretation and identifi- 
cation of depositional environments (vide infra). They were summarized by 
Tankard (1974a: 219) who stated that, ‘In the Pliocene a transgressing sea 
pushed deltaic marsh sediments ahead of it until it reached a temporary still- 
stand . . . [with the] temporarily stable conditions [allowing] a barrier bar to 
build up, behind which estuarine conditions prevailed. The estuary was fed by a 
river from the north-east. The final transgression reworked the older sediments.’ 
It was at the time of the stillstand that the Quartzose Sand Member was 
accumulated, while the Pelletal Phosphorite Member was laid down during the 
final transgression (Fig. 2). 


PLIOCENE FOSSIL OCCURRENCES IN LANGEBAANWEG, SOUTH AFRICA 


‘UOI}VULIO Ja}eMSIVA OY} JO AIO}SIY [eUOTIISOdSp 94], *7 “SIA 


HLYON Hinds 


HWISW3IW 13AVH9 JH - uolssasBsues, auisew auasoljg e Aq payxsomas (UONeWIOY eyUepjes) syisodap auaso!yy 


ECE ee oo Lae tas wee BS Seer Jlrs SS EPPS pSV SstSSSo OS 5 5 SS e MSP seas SSS CLEP ACP RSS SOLIS 


- uorssasGsues} ay. ur pueysyjiys Asesodwa} e Guinp pajejnwngse sjisodaqg 
WOT s 


eS Ses Sa IO Ieee = ES CBO SSeS eS SPLISH Sa Te SOS FG0 SI Ss ORF e CO ° SPS FO O 3S DQ PASS OS GIST FSS SOS 


( | O Ss syeiy PNW 


Asenjsy 


YIGWIW JLIGVOHdSOHd WL3illid IHL = uoissasBsues) ay) 40 aseyd peur ay) fulsnp payeynungoe sjisodag 


OP eoeos 


--------- +--+ ee eS ET ESS DIF OTB FS BY OPS ST 9 99 F990 S M8 9950S FPS SSGOFS9 9 0975 5 PSP SE DOF SOS OL 


—= : r 
—— =— . 
, —> ot , —— ——— 
——— i Oe 
= 0 


wos 9 
£ 


oD?) ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM 


Although the geology of the Varswater Formation is now well known, 
there is still scope for further detailed work. Of particular interest to the 
palaeontological investigation is geological evidence indicating depositional 
environments. The relationships between fossils and the deposits in which they 
occur has hitherto received little attention. 


DEPOSITIONAL ENVIRONMENTS 


It is now generally accepted that the Varswater Formation accumulated 
during a marine transgression at a time when a river discharged into the sea in 
the immediate vicinity of “E’ Quarry. It follows that marine, fluvial and terrestrial 
environments were then present in the area, together with some of the attendant 
micro-environments peculiar to each. Theoretically it is therefore possible that 
deposition of this formation took place in more than one of these environments 
and also that as the sea transgressed macro- and/or micro-environmental 
changes might have occurred in any given area now exposed in the mine. 

Tankard (1975) has given an account of the depositional environments of 
the three units comprising the Varswater Formation in ‘E’ Quarry. They were 
as follows: 


Gravel Member— Rocky and sandy marine beach environments. 

Quartzose Sand Member—Essentially estuarine and fluvial environments, 
although a peat deposit, probably representing a marsh environment, 
is also mentioned. 

Pelletal Phosphorite Member—A_ shallow-water environment situated 

between a beach bar and beach. 

The means by which the vertebrate fossils in deposits overlying the Gravel 
Member came to be incorporated in these deposits has been the subject of some 
dispute in the past (Tankard 1975: 281). There is in fact no single answer to this 
question and it is clear that just as the depositional environments of the sediments 
varied, so too did those of the fossils. The characteristics of the deposits change 
both vertically and horizontally, the most noticeable and frequent changes being 
in the lower levels of the succession, that is, those levels in which fossils occur 
most commonly. Although no detailed study of the relationships between 
sediments and fossils has yet been undertaken, it is obvious that differences in 
the deposits go together with palaeontological differences. 

Some observations on the environments in which the ‘E’ Quarry fossils were 
laid down have already been recorded (Hendey 1974a), but it is probably worth 
while at this stage to elaborate on earlier statements. 


The Gravel Member 


The fauna of the Gravel Member is comprised overwhelmingly of marine 
species, both invertebrates and vertebrates, and the fossils of this member were 
undoubtedly accumulated along a marine shoreline. The invertebrates indicate 


PLIOCENE FOSSIL OCCURRENCES IN LANGEBAANWEG, SOUTH AFRICA 223 


the presence of both rocky and sandy habitats. Remains of terrestrial vertebrates 
do occur, but they are invariably fragmented and rolled. This also applies to 
many of the marine fossils. The condition of the fossils is evidently the result of 
wave action and it differs from that of fossils from fluvial deposits in the 
Quartzose Sand and Pelletal Phosphor te Members. 


The Quartzose Sand Member 


The situation in respect of Quartzose Sand Member depositional environ- 
ments is complicated. Tankard (1975) has recognized both estuarine and fluvial 
facies within this member and many of the fossils recovered from the ‘E’ Quarry 
exposures must have been deposited in the river and estuary. For example, some 
of the fossiliferous exposures in the eastern parts of the mine are medium to 
coarse sands which are a westerly extension of the fluvial deposits referred to by 
Tankard (1975: 274). On the other hand, the nature of some fossil occurrences 
suggests that specimens were deposited in areas adjacent to the river and estuary 
in both subaerial and subaqueous situations (e.g. floodplain and pond). 

Evidence suggesting that certain of the Quartzose Sand Member fossils 
were accumulated on land surfaces has been mentioned elsewhere (Hendey 
1974a: 349-353). Since this discussion related to carnivore activity rather than 
environments of deposition, some points concerning the latter were omitted or 
insufficiently emphasized. 

In certain of the Quartzose Sand Member exposures (e.g. the floodplain 
deposits of East Stream) the condition of the fossils and the nature of their 
occurrence contrasts with the situation where there is incontrovertible evidence 
for subaqueous deposition of material (e.g. in the fluvial deposits of the Pelletal 
Phosphorite Member). The fossils in the latter deposits tend to be abraded and 
fragmented, while elements of single skeletons are dispersed. Exceptions to these 
rules were probably specimens which had been protected by soft tissues or which 
had not been subjected to prolonged transport. The fossils of subaerially 
accumulated assemblages are generally perfectly preserved and damage to, or 
dispersal of, specimens can usually be ascribed to carnivore activity or fires. 

The fact that there are certain Quartzose Sand Member fossil occurrences 
where only terrestrial species are recorded, or where they are much more 
commonly represented than aquatic species, also tends to suggest that there was 
subaerial accumulation of specimens. The presence of some aquatic species 
could be explained by periodic inundations of land surfaces. The persistent 
presence of an aquatic environment would lead to higher proportions of 
aquatic species being represented and there are occurrences in the Quartzose 
Sand Member where this is the case. In one such occurrence in the East Stream 
area a relatively high proportion of fish bones went together with appreciable 
quantities of abraded bone. These fossils were probably deposited in a channel, 
a feature for which there was no other obvious evidence. 

An example of burnt bone having suggested that a skeleton cannot have 
been moved after it was partially burnt was given elsewhere (Hendey 1974a: 


224 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM 


351). The nature of this particular occurrence was the important factor, since 
burnt bone itself is not necessarily proof that there were fires over areas 
presently exposed in the mine. Burnt bone might easily have been washed in 
from elsewhere. There is another recently discovered example of burnt bone 
which must have been in situ. This was a concentration of several hundred bones 
of small vertebrates, mainly rodents and insectivores, most of which are heavily 
charred. This occurrence is likely to represent the residue of a burnt owl pellet 
accumulation, which cannot have been moved after burning without the bones 
becoming dispersed. 

A hitherto unrecorded factor which supports the theory that some subaerial 
accumulation of fossils occurred concerns the presence of coprolites in the 
deposits. Coprolites of at least three types have been recovered from the 
Quartzose Sand Member. The first and largest type were evidently produced by 
large carnivores, probably hyaenas. The second type are smaller and contain 
fragmented bones belonging to small vertebrates. They were probably produced 
by one or more of the smaller carnivores recorded from this member. An 
account of such coprolites was recently given by Mellett (1974). The last type are 
small, with no visible bone and tending to be cylindrical when not deformed. 
Their source is not known but they are extremely abundant in certain areas 
(e.g. East Stream). 

Coprolites have been recovered only in certain parts of the mine and, except 
for the smallest kind, they are nowhere common. Their condition varies, some 
being remarkably fresh in appearance, while others are fragmented and distorted. 
One of the ?hyaena coprolites, which was found together with four others, is 
flattened, its appearance suggesting that it was trampled when fresh. Some of the 
smallest coprolites, which are very fine-textured, show clear impressions made 
by leaves, although they may be otherwise undistorted. 

In order for faeces to be preserved intact they must almost certainly have 
been dropped on a land surface and have been fairly rapidly buried thereafter. 
Fresh faeces dropped in and then transported by water is unlikely to have 
survived intact for long. It is also unlikely that groups of specimens would have 
remained together if they had been transported and there are four instances 
recorded where groups of 3, 3, 5 and 7 ?hyaena coprolites were found in close 
association. These groups, together with several isolated specimens, came from 
a relatively limited area in the eastern part of the mine. Unexcreted faeces could 
have been carried to its final resting place while still inside a carcass, but none 
of the coprolites has been found in direct association with other remains of their 
possible producer. In addition, the shape of the better preserved specimens, and 
the presence of leaf impressions on some, indicates that they had actually been 
excreted. 

Taken in conjunction the various factors referred to above are here regarded 
as convincing evidence for subaerial accumulation of at least part of the 
Quartzose Sand Member fossil assemblage. 

The earlier reference to periodic inundations of land surfaces was intended 


PLIOCENE FOSSIL OCCURRENCES IN LANGEBAANWEG, SOUTH AFRICA 225 


to indicate seasonal flooding of the river and estuary, but there is also evidence 
for tidal flooding. A recently exposed deposit in the south-western part of the 
mine includes an invertebrate fauna which indicates that the depositional 
environment was a tidal mud flat. The nature of the deposits is in keeping with 
the fauna which it contains. The limited exposures of this deposit examined prior 
to their becoming temporarily inaccessible suggested that it overlies the peat bed 
mentioned earlier (see Table 2). 

The faunas of the peat and tidal mud flat beds are strikingly different from 
one another and both differ from the fauna of more typical exposures of the 
Quartzose Sand Member elsewhere. The mud flat bed is an exceptional 
occurrence in this member, being the only one from which large numbers 
of well-preserved invertebrate fossils have been recovered. Vertebrate remains 
are rare. By contrast vertebrate fossils occur commonly in the peat bed 
and in certain other exposures of the Quartzose Sand Member. As fossil- 
collecting in this member has progressed, it has become apparent that while 
certain vertebrate species are fairly ubiquitous, others occur only in certain 
areas, while the overall representation of species and the condition of specimens 
varies from place to place. While it may not yet be possible to interpret all such 
evidence meaningfully, a superficial comparison of the peat bed and East Stream 
faunas should serve to illustrate that different sediments go together with faunal 
differences. 

In this instance the sediment differences are visually striking, the black 
sands and clays of the peat bed contrasting sharply with the white quartzose 
sands of the East Stream area. The deposits in the latter area are here regarded 
as a largely floodplain accumulation, while the peat area is thought to have been 
a marsh. 

The fossils of the peat bed tend to be less complete than those from East 
Stream, although this may in part, or even largely, be due to the recent disturb- 
ance of the peat by mining activities. This disturbance may also account for the 
fact that whereas at East Stream a number of instances are recorded where 
partial skeletons of individuals were preserved, nothing on a comparable scale 
has so far been observed in the peat bed. A notable exception was the discovery 
of the distal extremities of a sivathere fore- and hindlimb, elements of which 
were found in articulation standing more or less vertically in the deposit, 
seemingly all that survived of an animal trapped in the marshy deposits. At East 
Stream elements of single skeletons were, with few exceptions, found slightly 
dissociated from one another and they tended to lie more or less horizontally in 
the deposits. This suggests that they were accumulated on a firm surface. 

Although a single species of land tortoise (Chersina sp.) 1s the most 
commonly represented vertebrate in both areas, there are otherwise some 
marked differences in the representation of species. There are many species 
recorded from East Stream which are not known from the peat bed, although 
the reverse either does not apply or is at least much less obvious. Another 
example concerns the pig, Nyanzachoerus, which is known from the peat bed on 


226 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM 


the basis of only a few isolated teeth and bones, whereas at East Stream the 
remains of at least fifteen individuals, some represented by incomplete skeletons, 
have been collected. Birds, which are common in both areas, provide another 
example. In the East Stream assemblage the most common species 1s a francolin, 
which is a terrestrial bird, but in the peat bed it is rare, while waterbirds are 
relatively more common (G. Avery pers. comm.). 

Another rather curious difference between the two faunas concerns the 
representation of the seal, Prionodelphis capensis. This species is not common in 
either of the faunas, but at East Stream it is represented almost exclusively by the 
remains of very young individuals, whereas only a few isolated teeth and bones 
of adult seals are known from the peat bed. There are also differences in the 
coprolite occurrences in the two areas. East Stream is one of the areas in the 
mine where the smallest type of coprolite occurs in great numbers, while the 
larger type with visible bone and those of ?hyaenas are rare. The only coprolites 
known from the peat bed area few specimens of the type which contains visible bone. 

A complete analysis of the two assemblages will no doubt provide further 
and more precise examples of their similarities and differences, which are 
presumably more than just fortuitous. 

The potential importance of faunal analysis in determining depositional 
environments is illustrated by the fact that there are obvious differences in 
faunal assemblages even where deposits are superficially little different or 
indistinguishable. Such differences have been observed at the same level in 
apparently homogeneous deposits over distances of only a few metres. An 
example mentioned earlier was the occurrence in the East Stream area of a 
‘channel’ containing a relatively high proportion of fish remains and abraded 
bones. A second example concerns a quartzose sand exposure in the vicinity of 
the peat bed which was found on screening to contain large numbers of frog 
bones, but very few terrestrial vertebrate fossils. In similar deposits elsewhere the 
representation of fossils was reversed, with frogs being rare and terrestrial 
vertebrates common. The presence of a pond, which left no other obvious 
traces, could account for the amphibian-rich occurrence. 

Although the question of depositional environments within the Quartzose 
Sand Member has received only passing attention during the current phase of 
the palaeontological investigation, there is evidence for fossils having accumu- 
lated in estuarine, fluvial, marsh, mud flat, pond and floodplain environments. 


The Pelletal Phosphorite Member 


The Pelletal Phosphorite Member covers a wide area and is much the 
thickest of the units in the Varswater Formation, but it is known to include 
vertebrate fossils in large numbers only in a relatively limited area, exposures of 
which still exist along the more northerly part of the west wall of the mine. These 
fossiliferous deposits are informally termed ‘bed 3a’ and reasonably large fossil 
samples have been recovered from two exposures, designated ‘bed 3aS’ and 
‘bed 3aN’ (Fig. 3). 


DOG), 


PLIOCENE FOSSIL OCCURRENCES IN LANGEBAANWEG, SOUTH AFRICA 


puryog ‘Jay pomodie) Seg poq pue (JY4sII pamolie) Nee paq jo 


*(soor} 
soinsodxs Surmoys ‘(¢L6] IsNsNYW) AlIeNYD .q, 0} UOISUd}xe A]IO}SOM MOU SUL “€ “SILT 


228 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM 


The bed 3aS deposits are exposed along the lower mining face (‘bottom cut’) 
of the west wall, while the bed 3aN deposits are approximately 100 metres 
north-north-west on the upper mining face (‘top cut’) at elevations of between 
2 and 4 metres higher. The bed 3aN deposits are close to the northerly limit of 
economically recoverable phosphate and are only between 2 and 3 metres thick, 
of which only the lowest 0,5 to 1 metre is fossiliferous. Some fossils have been 
recovered from the uppermost levels of the Pelletal Phosphorite in this area, but 
they are not regarded as part of the bed 3aN sample. The bed 3aS deposits are 
also between 2 and 3 metres thick in an area sampled by controlled excavations 
during 1969 and 1970. In this area fossils were concentrated in three distinct 
levels spread over the lowest 1,5 metres of deposit. Bed 3aS deepens in a southerly 
direction, where there may be more than three levels of concentration. The 
thickness of both beds 3aS and 3aN is considerably less than the 25 metre 
maximum development of the Pelletal Phosphorite Member. 

In the bed 3aN area the base of this member is marked by a 0,75 metre thick 
phosphatic sandstone. The surface of the rock at its most northerly exposure 
appears to be fairly smooth and more or less horizontal, while the overlying 
deposits are apparently not fossiliferous. A little further south the rock surface 
dips markedly to the south-west and it becomes progressively more irregular. 
Crevices and potholes filled with coarse sand and gravel are common and the 
rock eventually becomes discontinuous. Fossils occur in abundance where the 
rock surface is irregular, being concentrated in the irregularities and becoming 
progressively less common upwards in the overlying finer-grained sediments. 
The latter have a clay component in the more northerly exposures, but this is 
absent in the southerly exposures where the deposits which immediately overly 
the rock are unconsolidated sands. The ill-defined boundary between these two 
types of deposit runs from north-east to south-west. Indications are that there 
was a channel of fast-flowing water directed in a south-westerly direction in that 
area where the rock surface is irregular and where the overlying deposits are 
unconsolidated sands. The clayey-sands apparently formed the northern bank 
of the channel. 

The nature of the bed 3aS fossiliferous occurrences is essentially similar, 
except that in this instance there is no rock horizon at the base of the deposits, 
there are no clayey deposits indicating a channel bank and fossils are concen- 
trated at more than one level in the deposits. The exact stratigraphic relationship 
between bed 3aS and bed 3aN is not known, but the lower elevation and more 
southerly situation of the former suggests that it was laid down earlier during the 
marine transgression than bed 3aN. There may, however, be a direct link 
between the highest of the bed 3aS levels of fossil concentration and bed 3aN. 

Indications are that bed 3a was laid down in, or in the direct path of the 
river which discharged into the sea most of the sediment making up the Pelletal 
Phosphorite Member and that the course of the river shifted northwards as the 
sea transgressed. A structure contour map of the base of the Pelletal Phosphorite 
Member (Tankard 1975: fig. 3), a modified version of which is reproduced here 


PLIOCENE FOSSIL OCCURRENCES IN LANGEBAANWEG, SOUTH AFRICA 229 


i 


w 


# U iT ‘Ss Ak Q P 0 _(N 
| 


(i 
1 
ra oe lege 
' 33 
yet | 40 
_! 38 iE 
a sal - Na 
ee [4 
: 6 
h 
0 300 


“9 es nee eee) contour interval 2m 
metres 
10 


Fig. 4. Structure contour map of the base of the Pelletal Phosphorite Member. Arrowed lines 
indicate the probable courses of the river at the time that beds 3aS and 3aN were laid down. 
(Adapted from Tankard 1975: Fig. 3.) 


(Fig. 4), supports the suggestion that the lower course of the river was directed 
towards the area where bed 3a is now exposed. 

The nature of the bed 3a fossil occurrences, and particularly those of bed 
3aN, provide clear evidence for deposition by fast-flowing water. Specimens 
trapped by irregularities in the rock surface had protruding parts either com- 
pletely abraded away or broken up and the fragments scattered in a south- 
westerly direction. In many instances specimens on the rock surface had their 
lower parts abraded, apparently by the coarser sediment fraction carried along 
the rock surface by the flowing water. Individual elements of single skeletons 
were dispersed and in some instances were traced by following connected series 
of irregularities in the rock surface. 

A feature of the faunas of both beds 3aS and 3aN was the large number of 
specimens of the seal, Prionodelphis capensis, which are represented. Several well- 
preserved skulls of this species were recovered from bed 3aN, while the several 
skulls of the similarly-sized hyaena, Hyaena abronia, found in the same deposits 
were not as well preserved or as complete. The more numerously represented 
and better preserved remains of the aquatic carnivore suggests that deposition 


230 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM 


was in a subaqueous environment and that the remains of the terrestrial species 
had suffered transport over longer distances. As a general rule the terrestrial 
fossils from bed 3a are more fragmented and less well preserved than similar 
specimens from some of the Quartzose Sand Member deposits. 

While most of the bed 3a fossils probably were deposited subaqueously, the 
possibility cannot be ruled out that some subaerial accumulation of material 
also took place (e.g. on the river banks and/or sand bars). A ?hyaena coprolite 
was recovered from the clayey deposits of bed 3aN, that is, those deposits 
regarded as having formed the northern bank of the channel at the time that the 
fossils of bed 3aN were being accumulated. The smallest type of coprolite is not 
uncommon in bed 3aS, but the majority of these specimens are fragmented, their 
condition being in marked contrast to the generally very well preserved specimens 
from the Quartzose Sand Member. 

The previously stated opinion that some of the fossils from what is now 
termed bed 3aS were derived from the Quartzose Sand Member (Hendey 19708: 
122), may be relevant to the question of the bed 3aS coprolites. These specimens 
could well be part of the derived element of the bed 3aS assemblage, having 
hardened sufficiently while incorporated in the Quartzose Sand Member to 
survive transport to, and redeposition in the Pelletal Phosphorite Member. On 
the other hand, they were in most cases not hard enough to survive the trans- 
portation intact. 

While there is a strong likelihood that the bed 3aS deposits include fossils 
derived from the Quartzose Sand Member, there is no evidence to suggest that 
this was the case with bed 3aN. Truncation of the Quartzose Sand Member after 
the 30 metre stillstand must have been confined to the early stages of the final 
transgression, that is, the time when the lower levels of bed 3aS were being laid 
down. The great majority of the bed 3aS coprolites come from the lower levels. 
The relatively high elevation of bed 3aN virtually precludes the possibility of it 
containing fossils derived from the Quartzose Sand Member. 

Occasional fossils have been recovered from exposures of the Pelletal 
Phosphorite Member other than beds 3aS and 3aN. Some specimens have been 
collected in the west wall area from deposits overlying bed 3a, including a few 
from the uppermost level. These specimens were probably also transported into 
the area by the river. Their rarity may be due to the river mouth having been 
some distance away when these deposits were laid down, the fossils representing 
the remnants of occasional carcasses which had floated out to sea from the river 
mouth. Specimens have also been collected from several different levels in the 
most north-easterly exposures of the Pelletal Phosphorite Member. These 
fossils are probably the remains of animals accumulated near the southern side 
of the river mouth, while those of bed 3a accumulated in, ahead of and on the 
northern bank of the river mouth (Fig. 4). 


PLIOCENE FOSSIL OCCURRENCES IN LANGEBAANWEG, SOUTH AFRICA 23 il 


FAUNA 


During the past six years large numbers of fossils have been collected from 
‘E’ Quarry, most material having come from surface collecting, excavations at 
random and screening of deposit, but some also having been recovered in 
controlled excavations. The deposits sampled extend over an area of about 
28 hectares (70 acres), with specimens having come from all the known fossili- 
ferous horizons within the Varswater Formation. There is considerable variation 
in the size of assemblages from individual occurrences within the deposits, while 
the total assemblages from each of the three members are also of unequal size. 
The fauna of the Quartzose Sand Member is the largest and best known, since it 
has been exposures of this member which have been the principal focus of 
attention during the current phase of the Langebaanweg project (Fig. 5). Mining 
of highly fossiliferous Pelletal Phosphorite Member deposits (bed 3a) was 
recommenced during 1975 so that there has recently been a substantial increase 
in the amount of material collected from this member. Relatively little time has 
been devoted to the collecting of fossils from the Gravel Member, exposures of 
which are limited. 

In terms of the requirements for taxonomic studies, many species, mainly 
amongst the smaller vertebrates, are more than adequately represented in 
existing collections and in such instances the addition of further material may 
be of little or no significance. There are, however, many more species which are 
poorly represented and in these instances there is still a real need to build up 
sample sizes. Since 1969 the annual additions to the collections have always 
included several new records for the site, while there has also been further 
identification of material already in the collections. The ‘E’ Quarry fauna is, in 
general, comparatively well known, although most of the specimens have still 
to be studied in detail. 

The following summary accounts of groups represented in the fauna include 
references to recent new records, recent and current studies, significant additions 
to previously existing species assemblages, as well as other comments on avail- 
able material. 


Invertebrates 


Many of the invertebrate fossils recovered from ‘E’ Quarry have already 
been described (Kensley 1972), this material having come from the Gravel 
Member, while Tankard (1975) has mentioned other invertebrates from the 
Varswater Formation. Additional material is now available, including the first 
substantial invertebrate assemblage from the Quartzose Sand Member. This 
material is from the tidal mud flat deposit mentioned earlier and includes 
marine, freshwater and terrestrial molluscs. Many of the specimens are remark- 
ably well preserved, some even retaining traces of their original colour. This 
material is being studied by B. Kensley (South African Museum) and P. Nuttall 
(British Museum (Natural History)). 


ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM 


ay) 


*poq SdVJINS OY} SI YS 
94} UO IOJCABSXO [BO[ULYDOL 9Y} JO JOOI oY} DAOQK JsOdop J9jYSI] OUT, “Ioquayy oy1oydsoy [e}2][9q Sy} JO sainsodxo ore puNojsyorq oy} Ul soovy 
[BSI}IOA TOMO] OM} OY} TIYM “OULU OY} JO JOOY OY} JOAO pasodxe sf JaqMIaJ, PUBS 9SOZ}IeND IY *AIeND ., SSOI9v MIA A]1O}svd-yINOS YW *¢ “SI 


7 


teow 
«= 


: Sa oa oe ee 
he PaaS sivreai Bute 5 . 


PLIOCENE FOSSIL OCCURRENCES IN LANGEBAANWEG, SOUTH AFRICA 233 


Lower vertebrates 


No progress has been made in the identification of bony fish, amphibians 
and reptiles, but P. A. Hulley (South African Museum) has completed a pre- 
liminary investigation of the cartilaginous fish from the Gravel Member 
(Table 3). Of particular interest was the fact that the Selachii proved more 
diverse than anticipated, with the assemblage being complicated by the presence 
of derived specimens (see p. 243). 


TABLE 3 


A provisional list of the cartilaginous fish from the Gravel Member of the Varswater 
Formation, including derived material. (Identified by P. A. Hulley of the South African 
Museum.) 


SELACHII 


Hexanchidae 
Notidanus serratissimus 
Carcharhinidae 
Carcharhinus melanopterus 
Carcharhinus limbatus 
Galaeorhinus sp. 
Prionace glauca 
Negaprion sp. or Hypoprion sp. 
Odontaspidae 
Odontaspis accutissima 
Odontaspis sp. B 
Odontaspis sp. C 
Otodontidae 
Megaselachus megalodon 
Carcharodontidae 
Carcharodon sp. 
Isuridae 
Tsurus sp. 
Squalidae 
Squalus sp. 
Squatinidae 
Squatina africana 
Squatina sp. 
BATOIDEI 
Rajidae 
Raja sp. 
Trygonidae 
Gen. & sp. indet. 
Myliobatidae 
Myliobatis sp. 


Birds 


Although the ‘E’ Quarry birds probably constitute the largest late Tertiary 
avian assemblage from anywhere in Africa, they have received only superficial 
attention, with only one species, a penguin, having been positively identified 
(Simpson 1971). The original study of the penguin remains suggested the 
presence of a second species and this has now been confirmed by more recently 
discovered material, although the second species remains unidentified (Simpson 


234 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM 


1975). G. Avery (South African Museum) has identified to the family or genus 
level about a dozen other birds, but there are many more which are completely 
unclassified. The Quartzose Sand Member has been the source of the largest 
number and the best preserved of the specimens. New material includes 
incomplete skeletons of two large raptors and another belonging to a stork-like 
species. The tidal mud flat deposits of the Quartzose Sand Member contain 
fragments of bird egg-shell, some of which retain their colour. 


Mammals 


The mammalian fossils from the ‘E’ Quarry exposures of the Quartzose 
Sand and Pelletal Phosphorite Members have been the principal focus of the 
current phase of the Langebaanweg project. The number of species recorded 
from these deposits has grown steadily over the years and approximately 
seventy-five have now been positively or tentatively identified (Table 4). Only 
about one-third have been described and even these include a number which are 
incompletely classified, largely because of inadequacies in available material. In 
some instances newly discovered material has made positive identifications 
distinctly possible. 


Mammalian microfauna 


The updated list of “E’ Quarry mammals differs most markedly from those 
previously published by including provisional identifications of many of the 
small mammals from the Quartzose Sand Member. This part of the list was 
provided by T. N. Pocock (Vanderbijlpark, Transvaal). Of interest is the first 
record of a bat from the site. The small mammals of the Pelletal Phosphorite 
Member, which are generally represented by more fragmentary material, remain 
unstudied. The rodents are to be studied by Craig C. Black (Carnegie Museum, 
Pittsburgh). 


Primates 


Although a cercopithecoid is tentatively recorded, there has been increasing 
doubt about its presence in view of the continued lack of positively identifiable 
material. Primates feature prominently in the late Cenozoic fossil record of 
Africa and their great rarity in, or complete absence from the Varswater 
Formation is a perplexing aspect of its fauna. A feature of this fauna is its great 
diversity and the situation which exists in respect of so successful a group as the 
primates is indeed curious. The situation of Langebaanweg in a coastal environ- 
ment at the southern continental extremity is likely to be related to the rarity or 
absence of this group. The Quaternary fossil record of the south-western Cape 
Province is characterized by a similar dearth of primates. 


Carnivores 
In contrast with the primates, carnivores are an exceptionally well repre- 


sented and diverse group. Fully one third of the Varswater Formation mammals 
identified to date are carnivores. 


PLIOCENE FOSSIL OCCURRENCES IN LANGEBAANWEG, SOUTH AFRICA 235 


TABLE 4 


A provisional list of the mammals from the Quartzose Sand and Pelletal Phosphorite Members 
of the Varswater Formation. 


Quartzose Pelletal 
Sand Phosphorite 
Member Member 
INSECTIVORA 
Chrysochloridae 
Chrysochloris sp. . : ; , A : : : < s< 
Soricidae 
Myosorex sp. 3 ‘ F : ; : ; ; x 
Suncus sp. : : : ; : i x 
Soricidae gen. & sp(p). indet. ; : 5 : : x 
Macroscelididae 
Elephantulus sp... ? ; F : : ; ; < x 
CHIROPTERA 
Vespertilionidae 
Eptesicus sp. . : ‘ ‘ ; ; ; : ; x 
? PRIMATES 
? Cercopithecidae 
Gen. & sp. indet. . : : ‘ : ; A : Xx 
PHOLIDOTA 
Manis sp. ; : : : ; ; ; Z . Xx 
TUBULIDENTATA 
Orycteropus sp. : 2 : : F é : ‘ x x 
CARNIVORA 
Canidae 
Vulpes sp. : eee a ST eas x 
Ursidae 
Agriotherium africanum 3 7 ; : 3 i Xx 
? Procyonidae 
Gen. & sp. indet. . : 3 ! ; ; : : x 
Mustelidae 
Mellivora aff. punjabiensis  . : x 
Mellivorinae gen. & sp. indet. (af. Plesiogulo) ; x 
Enhydriodon africanus . : f : x 
Viverridae 
Viverra leakeyi ~< x 
Viverrinae gen. & sp. indet. 
Genetta sp. x 
Herpestes sp. A x x 
Herpestes sp. B x x 
Herpestinae sp. C . x 
Herpestinae sp. D . x 
Herpestinae sp. E . x 
Hyaenidae 
Percrocuta australis ; < 
Hyaenictis preforfex . : ; : : ; : x 
Euryboas sp. noy. . x 
Hyaena abronia » < 
Hyaenidae sp. B x< 


Hyaenidae sp.E . : : : : ; ; : >< 


236 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM 


Quartzose Pelletal 
Sand Phosphorite 
Member Member 
CARNIVORA (cont.) 
Felidae 
Machairodus sp. x 
Homotherium sp. u Xx 
Felis sp. (small) x 
Felis aff. issiodorensis x x 
Felis obscura : x 
Dinofelis diastemata Z : 5 : : : x x 
Carnivora (possibly Lutrinae) gen. & sp. indet. : : 5 x< 
PINNIPEDIA 
Phocidae 
Prionodelphis capensis . : : : : : : x 4 
PROBOSCIDEA 
Gomphotheriidae 
Gen. & sp. indet. . : ¢ : ; ; : ; x S< 
Elephantidae 
Mammuthus subplanifrons . : : : : : < ? 
HYRACOIDEA 
Procavia cf. antiqua : , : : , ; ‘ x ? 
PERISSODACTYLA 
Equidae 
Hipparion sp. A. ‘ : ; ; : : : x 
Hipparionsp.B . ; , : : : : : Xx 
Hipparion namaquense . : : 3 : : : x 
Rhinocerotidae 
Ceratotherium praecox . : : F 5 : é < ? 
ARTIODACTYLA 
Tayassuidae 
Gen. & sp. indet. . : ; : : ‘ : 3 x 
Suidae 
Nyanzachoerus sp(p). . : j : F ‘ : x x 
Hippopotamidae 
Hippopotamus sp. . : : : E : : : x 
Giraffidae 
Sivatherium sp. ; ; : : , : ; ; x < 
Giraffa sp. : P : ; j : : : : < x 
Bobidae 
Tragelaphus aff. angasi . , : : : 2 : x x 
Mesembriportax acrae . : ; : : é , x x 
Bovini gen. & sp. indet. : , : : ; ; x x 
Reduncinisp. A. 3 ; : : : ‘ : x 
Reduncinisp.B. 5 : ; i : ; : x 
Alcelaphini sp. A . : : : : ; : - x 
Alcelaphini sp.B . : : : : : : 3 x 
Raphicerus sp. : : : . : : : : x x 
Gazella aff. vanhoepeni . : : : ; P : x 
?2Ovibovini gen. & sp. indet. s : ; ; ; x 
LAGOMORPHA 


x 


Gen. & sp. indet. . ; : 2 ‘ 3 ; F x 


PLIOCENE FOSSIL OCCURRENCES IN LANGEBAANWEG, SOUTH AFRICA DSi); 


Quartzose Pelletal 
Sand Phosphorite 
Member Member 
RODENTIA 
Bathyergidae 
Bathyergus sp. 2 ' : ‘ : : : : x x 
Cryptomys sp. : ‘ : é ‘ : : : x 
Hystricidae 
Gen. & sp. indet. . : : 4 ; ; : ? x 
Muscardinidae 
Graphiurus sp. : : A ; ; : } ; x 
Cricetidae/Muridae 
Aethomys sp. A. : : ; : : 5 ; x 
Aethomys sp. B x 
Mus sp. A < 
Mus sp. B : : x 
Rhabdomys sp. : : : x 
Otomyinae gen. & sp. nov. . x 
Mystromys sp. A “< 
Mystromys cf. darti x 
Mystromys cf. hausleitneri < 
Desmodillus sp. x 
Dendromus sp. x 
Steatomys sp. . : ; : ‘ s , e : x 
Rodentia gen. & spp. indet. : : ; 2 : ; x 
CETACEA 
Gen. & spp. indet. 3 ; , f : ; : : x x 


By far the best represented species is the seal, Prionodelphis capensis 
(Hendey & Repenning 1972). At the time that it was described, the species 
assemblage was already unusually large for a fossil phocid and since then many 
new specimens have been collected. P. capensis is evidently the best represented 
fossil phocid in the world. New material includes several nearly complete skulls 
(Fig. 6), parts of many more and hundreds of postcranial bones. Most of the 
material is from the Pelletal Phosphorite Member, the newest and best specimens 
having come from bed 3aN. 

In view of the environments of deposition in the Varswater Formation, other 
aquatic carnivores are surprisingly rare. Only one specimen belonging to the 
otter, Enhydriodon africanus, is known, although the assemblage does include one 
unidentified carnivore which might also have been an otter (Hendey 1974a). 

Until recently Canidae were known only on the basis of a few isolated teeth 
belonging to a small species and, as with the primate, there had been a growing 
doubt about identification. This doubt was dispelled by the discovery of a skull 
and associated postcranial bones belonging to the species. The skull has 
characters which indicate that the animal concerned was a fox (Vulpes sp.). It is 
known only from the Pelletal Phosphorite Member. 

Another of the carnivores from this member, the bear, Agriotherium 
africanum (Hendey 1972b), remains one of the rarer elements in the fauna, 
although some additional postcranial bones were found recently. 


238 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM 


Fig. 6. Dorsal, lateral and ventral views of a skull of the seal, Prionodelphis capensis 
(SAM-PQ-L 31976) from bed 3aN, Pelletal Phosphorite Member, ‘E’ Quarry. Scale in 
centimetres. 


PLIOCENE FOSSIL OCCURRENCES IN LANGEBAANWEG, SOUTH AFRICA 239 


Agriotherium was an unexpected addition to the ‘E’ Quarry fauna, being the 
first African record of the subfamily to which it belongs. Another similarly 
‘exotic’ species was recently tentatively identified, this time a procyonid. The 
Procyonidae were widely distributed in Eurasia and North America during the 
late Tertiary, but have not previously been recorded from Africa. The Lange- 
baanweg procyonid, if that is indeed what it is, may prove to be an enduring 
problem since it is poorly represented, with the only specimens having come 
from an area now covered by a mine dump. The specimens in question are 
fragments of the skull of an immature individual and parts of the hindfoot of an 
adult. 

The Mustelidae include another of the new records for the site and this 
species is as exotic as the Agriotherium and ?procyonid in terms of the known 
distribution of its closest relatives. The new species is a giant form whose size 
approaches that of Megalictis, from the North American Miocene, which is the 
largest of all known mustelids. It belongs to a group of wolverine-like carnivores 
which includes Megalictis and which has previously been recorded only in 
Eurasia and North America. The presence in Africa of a member of this group is 
in a sense even more unexpected than the presence of the bear and ?procyonid 
since, unlike them, the giant wolverines are not recorded from southern Asia, 
which is the Eurasian region with the greatest faunal resemblances to Africa. 

The giant wolverine and ?procyonid, which are both from the Quartzose 
Sand Member, join the list of Langebaanian species that belong to groups with 
an essentially Eurasiatic (and North American) record (Hendey 1974a: 61). 

Apart from the otter, or otters, and the giant wolverine, the only other 
mustelid known from ‘E’ Quarry is a small, poorly represented species of 
Mellivora (Hendey 1974a), one additional specimen of which was recently 
collected from the Pelletal Phosphorite Member. 

The Viverridae is the most diverse of the carnivore families known from the 
Varswater Formation. Previously only one civet (Viverra leakeyi) had been 
recorded, but new material indicates that there is at least one other species as 
well. The available civet material is problematical largely because it is so frag- 
mentary. A large number of new specimens belonging to smaller viverrids have 
been discovered. Most of the material belongs to herpestines, but a small genet 
is also represented. When the herpestines were first studied (Hendey 1974a) only 
two species were recognized (Herpestes spp. A and B) and they are now the most 
commonly represented viverrids in the ‘E’ Quarry assemblage. The new material 
includes a few specimens which apparently belong to three additional species 
(Hendey 1974b: 157). 

The most common of the larger terrestrial carnivores from the site are 
hyaenas, which now include one additional record, an apparently new species of 
Euryboas. The more advanced species of this genus were the long-legged and 
sharp-toothed ‘hunting hyaenas’ which occurred in Africa and southern Europe 
early in the Pleistocene (Hendey 1975). Four hyaena species had previously been 
recorded, namely, Percrocuta australis, Hyaena abronia, hyaenid species B and 


240 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM 


Hyaenictis preforfex, while a fifth, hyaenid species E, was tentatively identified 
(Hendey 1974a). The status of the latter remains unresolved. Additional speci- 
mens, readily identifiable with P. australis, H. abronia and Species B, have been 
discovered, but H. preforfex is still only known from the remains of a single, aged 
individual. A detailed study of the hyaenid material now available is warranted. 
H. abronia, the best represented of the species, may prove particularly useful in 
resolving the problem of whether or not the Quartzose Sand and Pelletal 
Phosphorite Members are substantially different in age (vide infra). 

The Felidae also include a recent new record, a small wildcat-sized species 
from the Quartzose Sand Member. Although specimens in addition to those 
already described have been discovered, only the false sabretooth, Dinofelis 
diastemata, is reasonably well represented. 


Proboscideans 


The Varswater Formation has yielded relatively few proboscidean specimens 
and those that have been found are generally fragmentary. The only exception 
is the incomplete skeleton of an elephant from the East Stream exposures of 
the Quartzose Sand Member (Maglio & Hendey 1970; Hendey 1974a: 349). 
Remains of an unidentified gomphothere occur more commonly than those of 
the elephant, Mammuthus subplanifrons. 


Perissodactyls 


Only one rhinoceros, Ceratotherium praecox, is known from the Varswater 
Formation (Hooijer 1972). It is perhaps the most commonly represented of the 
larger mammals from the Quartzose Sand Member, but only a few fragmentary 
specimens from the Pelletal Phosphorite Member may belong to this species. 

The situation in respect of the Equidae is more complex. The material from 
the Quartzose Sand Member is here regarded as belonging to two species of 
Hipparion, an opinion rejected by Hooijer (in preparation). A few specimens 
thought to be from the Pelletal Phosphorite Member were excluded from 
Table 4 because of uncertainties about their provenance. Otherwise the only 
significant specimen from this member is an incomplete lower dentition from the 
uppermost level of the deposits in the bed 3aN area. Hooijer (in preparation) 
has referred it to Hipparion namaquense Haughton, 1932. It is notable in being 
the only record of this species in the Langebaanweg area. Also no other speci- 
mens from the same horizon have yet been positively identified. 

The Equidae, perhaps more than any other group represented in the various 
fossil occurrences near Langebaanweg, are potentially important in resolving the 
problems of relative age and stratigraphic relationships of the deposits in which 
they occur. For example, although the Gravel Member in ‘E’ Quarry has 
produced few useful terrestrial vertebrate fossils, one interesting exception is an 
incomplete equid tooth, which, together with two teeth from the same horizon 
in ‘C’ Quarry, is tentatively identified with the Miocene species, Hipparion 
primigenium. Hooijer (in preparation) also rejects this identification, but if the 


PLIOCENE FOSSIL OCCURRENCES IN LANGEBAANWEG, SOUTH AFRICA 241 


material does indeed represent a Miocene species, it must have been reworked 
from the underlying Saldanha Formation. This formation would therefore be 
younger than 12,5 m.y. B.P., since before this date Hipparion was not present in 
Africa, or elsewhere in the Old World (Hooijer 1975). 

The Baard’s Quarry assemblage includes both Hipparion and Equus, the 
latter indicating that at least part of the fauna is younger than that from the 
Varswater Formation. The Hipparion material from Baard’s has recently proved 
to be as controversial as that from ‘E’ Quarry, but the assemblage is here 
regarded as being comprised of two species, the more commonly represented 
being distinct from the ‘E’ Quarry hipparions. Earlier it had been indicated that 
only one Hipparion was represented in the Langebaanweg occurrences (Hendey 
1972a; 1974a), but this is now discounted. The various issues relating to the 
Langebaanweg equids should eventually be resolved satisfactorily. 


Artiodactyls 

Perhaps the most unexpected of the recent new records from ‘*E’ Quarry is 
that of a peccary. Previously the species concerned had been regarded as a 
miniature pig (Hendey 1974a: 47), but additional material from bed 3aN led to 
the revised identification being suggested by both A. W. Gentry (British Museum 
(Natural History)) and H. B. S. Cooke (Dalhousie University) (pers. comm.). 
This is the first African record of the family Tayassuidae and it is also the most 
recent Old World occurrence. The nearest peccary record in both a geographic 
and temporal sense is the Miocene Pecarichoerus orientalis from the Siwalik 
Hills of India (Colbert 1933). The Langebaanweg peccary, which is one of the 
smallest ever recorded, was the subject of a recent preliminary study (Hendey 
in press). 

Nyanzachoerus is the only pig which occurs in the Varswater Formation and 
it is known from most of the fossiliferous exposures of the Quartzose Sand 
Member, having been particularly common in the East Stream area. The species 
from this member is remarkably well represented, the available assemblage being 
larger than those of previously described members of this genus. Recently 
Nyanzachoerus was recorded from the Pelletal Phosphorite Member for the first 
time. The specimen concerned, a fragmented and incomplete skull, differs in 
some respects from the Quartzose Sand Member specimens and probably 
represents a second species. Although not yet studied in detail, the Quartzose 
Sand Member Nyanzachoerus has already proved useful ‘in the relative dating of 
the deposits (Hendey 1973), and the Pelletal Phosphorite Member species 
promises to be equally useful in this respect (see p. 244). 

The apparent absence of hippopotamus from the ‘E’ Quarry fauna has 
previously given rise to comment, since the depositional environments of the 
Varswater Formation were such that this animal might have been expected to 
occur quite commonly (Hendey 1974a: 48). A few fragmentary hippo remains 
were found for the first time during 1975 in the bed 3aN exposures of the 
Pelletal Phosphorite Member. The fact that hippos are rare in this member and 


242 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM 


that they are still not recorded from the extensively sampled Quartzose Sand 
Member has yet to be satisfactorily explained. 

The ‘E’ Quarry Giraffidae are fairly well represented by elements of the 
postcranial skeleton, but cranial material is rare and invariably fragmented and 
incomplete. Some of the best giraffid specimens, belonging to both Sivatherium 
and Giraffa, have come from bed 3aN. The material is being studied by 
J. M. Harris (Kenya National Museum). 

One additional bovid species, a reduncine, was recently recorded from 
‘E’ Quarry. Curiously, Bovidae are not as well represented at this site in terms of 
numbers of individuals as they are at some of the Pleistocene fossil occurrences 
in the region. In addition, there are relatively few species recorded from the 
Quartzose Sand Member, which is otherwise remarkable for the diversity of 
species represented. On the other hand, certain deposits tend to include 
individuals of particular species in numbers which are disproportionately high 
in terms of their bovid assemblages as a whole. For example, the boselaphine, 
Mesembriportax acrae (Gentry 1974), is by far the most commonly occurring 
bovid in the Quartzose Sand Member, while in bed 3aS it is alcelaphines which 
are abundant. At least some of the Quartzose Sand Member boselaphine 
remains are believed to have accumulated sub-aerially, indicating that this 
species was an inhabitant of the area now exposed in the mine. Gentry (1974) 
suggested that the boselaphine was an open woodland species and this sort of 
habitat may well have existed in the immediate vicinity of the old estuary. The 
situation in respect of the Pelletal Phosphorite alcelaphines was probably quite 
different. Many, and perhaps all of the specimens were apparently washed to 
their final resting-places by the river and their carcasses may have originated 
upstream where the river crossed open plains, the probable preferred habitat of 
the alcelaphines. 


Other mammals 


Other terrestrial mammals recorded from the Varswater Formation include 
a pangolin, an aardvark, a dassie (hyrax) and a porcupine. All are rare. Cetacea 
are more common, but are represented mainly by undiagnostic postcranial 
bones. Both whales and dolphins occur, remains of the latter having been found 
for the first time during 1975. 

The porcupine is known only from a fragmented skull of a large and 
unidentified species which is currently being studied by Judy M. Maguire 
(Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Research). This specimen was 
found in the Quartzose Sand Member shortly after publication of a comment on 
the supposed absence of porcupines from the Varswater Formation (Hendey 
1974a: 42). 

The dassie, Procavia cf. antigua, was originally identified on the basis of 
very fragmentary specimens, but more and better material is now available. 
The most complete specimens are from easterly exposures of the Quartzose 
Sand Member. 


PLIOCENE FOSSIL OCCURRENCES IN LANGEBAANWEG, SOUTH AFRICA 243 


The aardvark is amongst the most poorly represented of the ‘E’ Quarry 
mammals and until recently the same applied to the pangolin. The situation in 
respect of the latter has been slightly improved by the discovery of an incomplete 
skeleton, including parts of the skull, much of the tail and parts of all four limbs. 


FLORA 


Prior to the exposure of the peat bed the only botanical remains recovered 
from the ‘E’ Quarry exposures of the Varswater Formation were some fossil 
root fragments from the Quartzose Sand Member. A series of samples from the 
peat bed submitted to the Institute for Environmental Sciences at the University 
of the Orange Free State included one which was pollen-rich. Approximately 
92 per cent of the sporomorphae belonged to one unidentified taxon (E. M. 
van Zinderen Bakker pers. comm. to A. J. Tankard). This may represent a 
locally abundant marsh plant. Interestingly, both tree and grass pollens were 
identified and this lends support to the earlier suggestion that these vegetation 
types must have been present in the area at the time that the deposits were laid 
down (Hendey 1973). 

During 1975 two boreholes were sunk from the floor of the mine into 
deposits underlying the Varswater Formation. They intersected two peat 
horizons which are evidently part of the Miocene Saldanha Formation. These 
peats contain both visible and microscopic plant remains. 


DATING 


A Pliocene age for the Varswater Formation, with an inferred chronometric 
date of 4-5 m.y. B.P., is still accepted, but there have been new developments 
concerning the dating of fossils from the Gravel Member and the age difference 
between the Quartzose Sand and Pelletal Phosphorite Members. 

The Gravel Member is composed largely of an abraded and fragmented 
phosphatic rock which is known to contain bone fragments and which is 
undoubtedly pre-Pliocene in age. The rock, and other deposits with which it 
may have been associated, was eroded during the early stages of the Pliocene 
marine transgression (Fig. 2). The possibility that some fossils might have been 
reworked from the deposits truncated by the transgression has been recognized, 
but was not substantiated until a study of the Gravel Member Selachii by 
P. A. Hulley revealed that some specimens are evidently of pre-Pliocene age. 
The derived fossils may also include the few isolated Hipparion teeth referred to 
earlier (see p. 240). The derived pre-Pliocene element in the Gravel Member 
fossil assemblage is likely to make up but a small part of the assemblage as a 
whole. 

Still unresolved is the question of the time taken for the Varswater Forma- 
tion to accumulate. There were clearly intervals of time between the deposition 


244 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM 


of fossils at different levels in the succession, but so far as is known the only one 
which may have been of sufficient duration to be palaeontologically significant 
was that between the deposition of the Quartzose Sand and Pelletal Phosphorite 
Members. The original opinion that the faunas of the two members were 
broadly contemporaneous (Hendey 19705) was based on the fact that they co 
have species in common and on the belief that differences between them were 
due simply to a general dissimilarity in the modes and environments of 
deposition of the fossils. 

On the other hand, the Pelletal Phosphorite Member does postdate the 
Quartzose Sand Member and it has been recognized that the time factor may 
have been significant enough to be reflected in the characteristics of individual 
species represented in the succession and to have influenced the overall compo- 
sition of the two faunas. Previous studies on species common to the two faunas 
have provided no conclusive evidence of significant evolutionary changes. 
For example, the suggestion that the Pelletal Phosphorite Viverra leakeyi might 
be a more advanced variety of the same species from the Quartzose Sand Member 
(Hendey 1974a: 81) has still not been substantiated. In this and other instances 
comparisons have been complicated mainly by inadequacies in the available 
material. 

The most important indication to date that the two faunas may be separated 
by a substantial period in time came with the discovery of the first Nyanzachoerus 
specimen from the Pelletal Phosphorite Member. The new specimen is in 
certain respects more advanced than the Quartzose Sand Member Nyanzachoerus 
and if there was an ancestor/descendant relationship between the two forms, 
their difference in age may be of the order of several hundred thousand years. 
Although comparisons with Nyanzachoerus species recorded elsewhere are 
‘complicated by the uniqueness of the ‘E’ Quarry forms’, indications are that 
the one from the Pelletal Phosphorite is unlikely to be less than 4 m.y. old, while 
that from the Quartzose Sand dates back probably no more than 5 m.y. 

Now that more material from the Pelletal Phosphorite Member is becoming 
available, the potential for meaningful comparisons between the two main 
faunas from ‘E’ Quarry is greatly increased. 

Relative dating of the ‘E’ Quarry fossils and deposits has been based on 
comparisons of some mammals with their counterparts at various localities in 
East Africa. The fact that this dating is neither very secure nor very precise is 
due to the small number of species which have been appropriate for such 
comparisons. It is increasingly apparent that the Langebaanweg fauna is a good 
deal more unique than had hitherto been supposed and although individual 
species do have much in common with their contemporaries further north, they 
are not always identical. If the fauna does indeed include local endemics, and 
also perhaps late survivors of lineages which were already extinct elsewhere, the 
faunal dating of the occurrences will become complicated and less satisfactory. 


PLIOCENE FOSSIL OCCURRENCES IN LANGEBAANWEG, SOUTH AFRICA 245 


CONCLUSIONS 


The ‘E’ Quarry fossil occurrences, which are the most important in the 
Langebaanweg area, are significant for a variety of reasons. There are very few 
recorded sites in southern Africa which have yielded vertebrate fossils of 
comparable age and the assemblages from such sites are minuscule by com- 
parison. Consequently the only substantial information on the nature of the 
subcontinental vertebrate fauna of 4-5 million years ago is derived from the 
‘E’ Quarry record. The nearest important fossil occurrences which are broadly 
contemporaneous are in East Africa, about 4 500 kilometres away (e.g. Vogel 
River Series, Lower Kaiso Formation, Mursi Formation of the Omo Group, 
Kanapoi/Lothagam and Kubi Algi at East Rudolf). However, not even these 
occurrences have produced assemblages so large and so diverse as that from 
‘E’ Quarry. Elsewhere in Africa the Pliocene fossil record is either poor or non- 
existent, so Langebaanweg is an especially important source of information on 
the animal life of this epoch not only in a local sense, but for Africa as a whole. 
It has the additional merit of being the only important Pliocene occurrence on 
the continent where both marine and terrestrial faunas are represented. 

Certain of the “E’ Quarry species assemblages are already impressively large 
and, since collecting is continuing, they are still growing. The preservation of 
specimens is generally very good, all skeletal elements are represented (and 
collected) and unequivocal associations of cranial and postcranial material are 
not uncommon. It should therefore ultimately prove possible to provide 
comprehensive definitions of many species and this may well assist in resolving 
identification problems in the smaller assemblages from other African sites. 

The species diversity is remarkable by any standards and as a result the 
fauna as a whole will be better known than those of many other sites where 
important elements may be lacking (e.g. vertebrate microfauna, birds, aquatic 
species). 

The ‘E’ Quarry fauna, like many others 1n southern Africa, has so far been 
dated only in a relative sense and in this respect it is more problematical than 
many from East Africa. However, the Langebaanweg occurrences are amongst 
the very few of any importance in southern Africa where generally acceptable 
geological dating is also possible. 

Perhaps the biggest drawback of the site lies with its situation at the 
southern continental extremity, far from the main focus of African late Cenozoic 
palaeontological investigation (i.e. East Africa). On the other hand, this may 
ultimately invest it with a particular interest since, as the contemporary East 
African fauna becomes better known, similarities and differences of 
zoogeographic significance may emerge. 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 


During the past two years a number of persons have contributed directly 
and indirectly to the furthering of the Langebaanweg research project and | am 


246 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM 


greatly indebted to them for their interest and contributions. Particular thanks 
are due to Mr G. Avery, Dr P. A. Hulley and Dr B. Kensley (South African 
Museum), Dr A. W. Gentry (British Museum (Natural History)), Dr J. M. Harris 
(Kenya National Museum), Dr D. A. Hooijer (Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke 
Historie), Dr R. G. Klein (University of Chicago), Mr T. N. Pocock (Vanderbijl- 
park) and Dr G. G. Simpson (The Simroe Foundation and University of 
Arizona). Dr A. J. Tankard (South African Museum), who has undertaken the 
geological study at Langebaanweg, patiently discussed the geology of the 
deposits with the result that several points concerning the depositional environ- 
ments of the fossils were clarified. Mr G. Benfield, the Mine Superintendent at 
Langebaanweg, has been unfailingly helpful and, together with other mine 
employees, has kept the project viable. 

The fieldwork at Langebaanweg is financed by the South African Council 
for Scientific and Industrial Research. The undertaking is aided on site in many 
ways by Chemfos Ltd., a subsidiary of Samancor. The South African Air Force 
has provided aerial photographs. The Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropo- 
logical Research (New York) provided the vehicle used for the fieldwork 
(Grant no. 2752-1834). The assistance of these organizations is gratefully 
acknowledged. 


REFERENCES 


COLBERT, E. H. 1933. An Upper Tertiary peccary from India.— Am. Mus. Novit. 635: 1-9. 

GENTRY, A. W. 1974. A new genus and species of Pliocene boselaphine (Bovidae, Mammalia) 
from South Africa.— Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 65: 145-188. 

HENDEY, Q. B. 1970a. A review of the geology and palaeontology of the Plio/Pleistocene 
deposits at Langebaanweg, Cape Province.— Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 56: 75-117. 

HENDEY, Q. B. 1970b. The age of the fossiliferous deposits at Langebaanweg, Cape Province. — 
Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 56: 119-131. 

HENDEY, Q. B. 1972a. Further observations on the age of the mammalian fauna from Lange- 
baanweg, Cape Province. —Palaeoecol. Afr. 6: 172-175. 

HENDEY, Q. B. 1972b. A Pliocene ursid from South Africa.— Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 59: 115-132. 

HENDEY, Q. B. 1973. Fossil occurrences at Langebaanweg, Cape Province.— Nature, Lond. 
244: 13-14. 

HENDEY, Q. B. 1974a. The late Cenozoic Carnivora of the south-western Cape Province. — Ann. 
S. Afr. Mus. 63: 1-369. 

HENDEY, Q. B. 1974b. Faunal dating of the late Cenozoic of southern Africa, with special 
reference to the Carnivora.— Quat. Res. 4: 149-161. 

HENDEY, Q. B. 1975. Relationships of North American hyaenas.—S. Afr. J. Sci. 71: 187. 

HENDEY, Q. B. In press. Fossil peccary from the Pliocene of South Africa. Science. 

HENDEY, Q. B. & REPENNING, C. A. 1972. A Pliocene phocid from South Africa.— Ann. S. Afr. 
Mus. 59: 71-98. 

Hoover, D. A. 1972. A late Pliocene rhinoceros from Langebaanweg, Cape Province.— 
Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 59: 151-191. 

Hoover, D. A. 1975. The hipparions of the Baringo Basin sequence.— Nature, Lond. 254: 
211-212. 

KENSLEY, B. 1972. Pliocene invertebrates from Langebaanweg, Cape Province.— Ann. S. Afr. 
Mus. 60: 173-190. 

Mactlo, V. J. & HENDEY, Q. B. 1970. New evidence relating to the supposed stegolophodont 
ancestry of the Elephantidae.—S. Afr. archaeol. Bull. 25: 85-87. 

MELLETT, J. S. 1974. Scatological origin of microvertebrate fossil accumulations. — Science 
185: 349-350, 


PLIOCENE FOSSIL OCCURRENCES IN LANGEBAANWEG, SOUTH AFRICA 247 


Simpson, G. G. 1971. Fossil penguin from the late Cenozoic of South Africa.— Science 171: 
1144-1145. 

Simpson, G. G. 1975. Notes on variation in penguins and on fossil penguins from the Pliocene 
of Langebaanweg, Cape Province, South Africa.— Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 69: 59-72. 

SINGER, R. 1961. The new fossil sites at Langebaanweg, South Africa.—Curr. Anthrop. 2: 
385-387. 

SouTH AFRICAN CODE OF STRATIGRAPHIC TERMINOLOGY AND NOMENCLATURE. 1971. Trans. 
geol. Soc. S. Afr. 74: 111-131. 

TANKARD, A. J. 1974a. Petrology and origin of the phosphorite and aluminium phosphate rock 
of the Langebaanweg—Saldanha area, south-western Cape Province.— Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 
65: 217-249. 

TANKARD, A. J. 19746. Chemical composition of the phosphorites from the Langebaanweg— 
Saldanha area, Cape Province.—Trans. geol. Soc. S. Afr. 77: 185-190. 

TANKARD, A. J. 1975. Varswater Formation of the Langebaanweg-—Saldanha area, Cape 
Province. —Trans. geol. Soc. S. Afr. 77: 265-283. 

TANKARD, A. J. In press. The Saldanha Formation: a Neogene transgressive complex. — Trans. 
geol. Soc. S. Afr. 


6. SYSTEMATIC papers must conform with the International code of zoological nomenclature 
(particularly Articles 22 and 51). 

Names of new taxa, combinations, synonyms, etc., when used for the first time, must be 
followed by the appropriate Latin (not English) abbreviation, e.g. gen. n., sp. n., comb. n., 
syn. n., etc. 

An author’s name when cited must follow the name of the taxon without intervening 
punctuation and not be abbreviated; if the year is added, a comma must separate author’s 
name and year. The author’s name (and date, if cited) must be placed in parentheses if a 
species or subspecies is transferred from its original genus. The name of a subsequent user of 
a scientific name must be separated from the scientific name by a colon. 

Synonymy arrangement should be according to chronology of names, i.e. all published 
scientific names by which the species previously has been designated are listed in chronological 
order, with all references to that name following in chronological order, e.g.: 


Family Nuculanidae 
Nuculana (Lembulus) bicuspidata (Gould, 1845) 
Figs 14-15A 
Nucula (Leda) bicuspidata Gould, 1845: 37. 
Leda plicifera A. Adams, 1856: 50. 
Laeda bicuspidata Hanley, 1859: 118, pl. 228 (fig. 73). Sowerby, 1871: pl. 2 (figs 8a—b). 
Nucula largillierti Philippi, 1861: 87 
Leda bicuspidata: Nicklés, 1950: 163, fig. 301; 1955: 110. Barnard, 1964: 234, figs 8-9. 


Note punctuation in the above example: 
comma separates author’s name and year 
semicolon separates more than one reference by the same author 
full stop separates references by different authors 
figures of plates are enclosed in parentheses to distinguish them from text-figures 
dash, not comma, separates consecutive numbers 


Synonymy arrangement according to chronology of bibliographic references, whereby 
the year is placed in front of each entry, and the synonym repeated in full for each entry, is 
not acceptable. 

In describing new species, one specimen must be designated as the holotype; other speci- 
mens mentioned in the original description are to be designated paratypes; additional material 
not regarded as paratypes should be listed separately. The complete data (registration number, 
depository, description of specimen, locality, collector, date) of the holotype and paratypes 
must be recorded, e.g.: 


Holotype 
SAM-—A13535 in the South African Museum, Cape Town. Adult female from mid-tide region, King’s Beach, 
Port Elizabeth (33.51S, 25.39E), collected by A. Smith, 15 January 1973. 


Note standard form of writing South African Museum registration numbers and of date. 


7. SPECIAL HOUSE RULES 


Capital initial letters 


(a) The Figures, Maps and Tables of the paper when referred to in the text 
e.g. *... the Figure depicting C. namacolus... 
*... in C. namacolus (Fig. 10)...’ 


(b) The prefixes of prefixed surnames in all languages, when used in the text, if not preceded 
by initials or full names 
e.g. Du Toit but A. L. du Toit 
Von Huene _—i but _~-F. von Huene 


(c) Scientific names, but not their vernacular derivatives 
e.g. Therocephalia, but therocephalian 

Punctuation should be loose, omitting all not strictly necessary 

Reference to the author should be expressed in the third person 

Roman numerals should be converted to arabic, except when forming part of the title of a 
book or article, such as 
“Revision of the Crustacea. Part VIII. The Amphipoda.’ 

Specific name must not stand alone, but be preceded by the generic name or its abbreviation 
to initial capital letter, provided the same generic name is used consecutively. 


SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION LIBRARIES 


3 9088 01340 8505 


Q. B. HENDEY 

THE PLIOCENE FOSSIL OCCURRENCES IN 
‘E’ QUARRY, 

LANGEBAANWEG, SOUTH AFRICA