Annual report of the Secretary of the Board of Agriculture

EG a

HATE caren an aia haa ot int

TaN iis sesncen tet

fa i oe i ay ie in ii

:

ee eee

:
ih Ht ‘ a iit

TN rl Ail
q " |
i

Se

a

se inti
Ne aie tai ig
' i

Via

A!

borete

(UN
La 4
‘ oe

on = = fl

i

° .

1; 5

ft =F — == 0) °

RW :
EE ee AE Ee

Ab
:
aA

movi 2

a1
a

Ti ‘LO

Howd of Agriculture,

SECRETARY’S REPORT,

WITH AN

ABSTRACT OF RETURNS

AGRICULTURAL SOCIETIES.

a a? )
a * f -#
j Te mn

tah

ay
Lari) iy t

UNUM? JO Ibe LO, Apolsog SSayy? JO ApLadoly
“TEaNOTOO T1N& ANSaaL

UPRET UT Y -OPHOYUD ML

FIRST ANNUAL REPORT

OF THE

SECRETARY

OF THE

BOARD OF AGRICULTURE,

TOGETHER WITH

THE REPORTS OF COMMITTEES,

APPOINTED TO VISIT THE COUNTY SOCIETIES.

WITH ANVAPP EN DT xe

CONTAINING AN ABSTRACT OF THE

FINANCES OF THE COUNTY SOCIETIES.

BOSTON:
WILLIAM WHITE, PRINTER TO THE STATE.
1854.

BOARD OF AGRICULTURE, 1854.

EX OFFICIIS.

His Excertency EMORY WASHBURN.
His Honor WILLIAM C. PLUNKETT.
EPHRAIM M. WRIGEY, Sceretary of State.

APPOINTED BY THE GOVERNOR AND COUNCIL.

MARSHALL P. WILDER, of Dorchester.
NATHANIEL WOOD, of Fitchburg.
EDWARD HITCHCOCK, of Amherst.

CHOSEN BY THE SOCIETIES.

Massacuusret7s,. . . . ROBERT C. WINTHROP, of Boston.
Essex, . . . . . . . MOSES NEWELL, of West Newbury.
Mippirsex, . . . . . SIMON BROWN, of Concord.
Worcester, . . . . « JOHN BROOKS, of Princeton.
WoRkcEsTER WEsT, .

Worcester Nortu, . . IVERS PHILLIPS, of Fitchburg.

Hampsuire, FRANKLIN
ee isa rR. JOSEPH SMITH, of Hadley.

HAMPSHIRE, . . . . . JOHN A. NASH, of Amherst.

HAMPDEN,. . . «. . «. FRANCIS BREWER, of Springfield.
FRANELIN,. « « . « »« HENRY W. CLAPP, of Greenfield.
BERKSHIRE, . . . . . STEPHEN REED, of Pittsfeld.
Housatonic, . . . . . JOSHUA R. LAWTON, of Gt. Barrington.
Norrorx,. . . . . « BENJAMIN V. FRENCH, of Braintree.
PiymoutH, .. . . . SETH SPRAGUE, of Duzbury.

BRISTOL, . - » »- « - J. H. W. PAGE, of New Bedford.
BaRNSTABLE,. . . . . C. B. H. FESSENDEN, of Sandwich.

CHARLES L, FLINT, Secretary.

. ta * in’
nae OR
- te “eels g h

oo Via
. aoe"
a -

Pita ine a
Pee I
le
wae - As bee Ti
“ rr a i wieliek ty’

4
‘ 1A weston + Wr wet

FIRST ANNUAL REPORT

OF THE

SECRETARY

OY THE

BOARD OF AGRICULTURE,

To the Senate and House of Representatives of the Common-
wealth of Massachusetts :

I propose, in my first Report, to review the past and present
condition of the Agriculture of Massachusetts. The past will
be found, it is thought, full of interest and instruction; the
present, full of encouragement and hope. The discussion of
special subjects will be left to a future occasion, with the
exception of such suggestions as seem to spring naturally from
the facts stated. This seems, indeed, to be the only course
which can be pursued. Previous to the organization of the
present Board, there has been no permanent department or
public officer, whose special duty it was to collect the facts
necessary for the guidance of the Legislature, and the vari-
ous societies in their efforts to advance the cause of Agri-
culture among us. The principal object of the Board, during
the past year, has accordingly been to procure the desired
information. It is these doings, which I now have the honor
to report for your consideration.

We cannot, without some little reflection, make full allow-
ance for the difficulties which surrounded the early settlers of

1

2 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

New England. We must ropieabee that they exchanged a
country far advanced in civilization,—and notwithstanding its
rude tillage and its large tracts of uninclosed moors, probably
better cultivated than any other on the globe,—for one entirely
new to them, with a climate and soil unlike any which they had
known before. They were to begin a life in which their pre-
vious experience could afford them little or no aid, in a wilder-
ness which was to be subdued by their own hands in the midst
of a thousand obstacles. The system of cultivation which
they had learned and practised in their own land, would not
serve them here. They were to start anew, and acquire, pain-
fully and laboriously, the knowledge which was applicable to
their new situation. If we find their progress to be slow, let
us not wonder that it was so; we should rather wonder that
they advanced at all, or even that they did not perish in the
wilderness amid the privations and the sufferings of winter.

For many months after their arrival, they had no beasts of
burden; when at last a few cows were brought over from the
mother country,* they were poorly fed on coarse meadow hay,
and often died from exposure and want of suitable food, or fell
a prey to the wolves and the Indians. Owing to the difficulties
and expense of importation, the price was so high as to put
them beyond the reach of many, even in moderate circum-
stances. <A red calf soon came to be cheaper than a black
one, on account of the greater probability of its being mistaken
for a deer and killed by the wolves. When cows were so high
as to sellin 1636, at from twenty-five to thirty pounds sterling,
and oxen at forty pounds a pair, a quart of new milk could be
bought for a penny, and four eggs at the same price.

It should be borne in mind, also, that the cattle of that
ime, even in England, were not to be compared with the
beautiful animals now seen there. The ox of that day was
small, ill-shaped, and in every way inferior to the ox of the

*The first cattle were imported by Edward Winslow, in the ship Charity,
March, 1624. Having been sent out as agent by the Plymouth Colony, he brought
over four animals, three of which were heifers. One authority says they arrived
in the ship Ann, the first voyage of which was made in 1623; but there can
be no doubt that the cattle referred to, at the time of the distribution of cattle in
1627, came in a subsequent voyage made by that vessel.

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 3

present time. The sheep has, since then, been improved to an
equal, or even greater extent, both in form and size, and the
fineness and value of its wool. The draught horse, so service-
able on the farm, long the pride of London, and now equally of
Boston, and the noble breed of race horses, so celebrated for
their fleetness, were not then known. It is difficult to appre-
ciate fully the changes, which the increased attention to agri-
culture has effected in domestic animals, even within the last
century.

During the early part of the last century, the average gross
weight of the neat cattle brought for sale to the Smithfield
market, was not over three hundred and seventy pounds, and
that of sheep, twenty-eight pounds. The average weight of
the former, is now over eight hundred pounds, and of the
latter, over eighty pounds. On account of the high price of
cattle at that period, and the risks to which they were to be
exposed, it is not probable that the settlers purchased even
the best specimens of the animals then known in England.
Such being the state of things, we may easily imagine that the
first cattle imported into New England, were of a very inferior
quality.

Nor was the difficulty of procuring agricultural implements
the least of the obstacles which the early settlers had to
encounter. Some were imported from the mother country,
but all could not obtain them in this way. The only metal to
be had was made of bog ore, very brittle, and liable to break
and put a stop toa day’s work. The implements of agricul-
ture seem, for the most part, to have been made from this
metal, and with comparatively little fitness for the purpose for
which they were designed. Even those imported from the moth-
er country, were not only of the rudest construction, but were
also extremely heavy and unwieldy; for the men of that time
had not discovered the art of diminishing weight without lessen-
ing strength. The process of casting steel was not invented
till more than a century later, (1750,) and then it was kept a
secret in Sheffield for some years. The number and variety of
implements have been infinitely increased, even within the last
half century, to meet the wants of a more advanced husbandry,

4 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

to which, indeed, these mechanical improvements have, in their
turn, largely contributed.*

It is true that the Pilgrims, on their arrival in this country,
had the benefit of the plants at that time cultivated and used
as food by the Indians, yet they were wholly unaccustomed to
these, and were ignorant of the mode of using them as food,
and of the manner of their cultivation. Indian corn, the staple
product, and the pride of America, had never been seen by
them. Pumpkins, squashes, potatoes and tobacco, were almost
equally strange to them. t

When their necessities taught them the value of these plants,
they were not slow in adopting the Indian methods of culti-
vating them. As the general cultivation, in the colonies,
continued much the same for many years, with only slight modi-
fications on the introduction of the plough, it may not be
inappropriate to turn our attention, for a moment, to the agri-
culture of the natives.

It is well known, that most of the hard work necessary to
supply their limited wants, fell to the lot of the women, assist-
ed, sometimes, by old men and little boys. Among their thank-
less tasks was that of farming, which they carried on to an
extent quite remarkable, when we consider the rudeness of the
tools with which they worked, and the circumstances in which
they were placed. They had no art of manufacturing metal,
and of course could have no proper implements of agriculture.
Their cultivation was not so rude, however, as one would nat-
urally suppose. They made a kind of hoe by tying the shoul-
der blade of a moose, bear or deer, to a stick or pole.

* The colonists do not seem to have been provided with ploughs; for we find
that twelve years after the landing at Plymouth, the farmers about Boston, having
no ploughs, were obliged to break up the bushes with their hands and hoes, to
prepare their lands for cultivation ; and even so late as 1637, there were but thirty-
seven ploughs in the whole State. It was the custom, even to a much later
period, for one owning a plough, to do most of the ploughing in a town; going
about from one part of the town to another. The town often paid a bounty to one
who would buy and keep a plough in repair, to do work in this way.

+ The potato was so rare in England at the beginning of the 17th century, as to
be served up only in very small quantities. It was sold at two shillings a pound,
for the queen’s table, and was used as a fruit, baked into pies, seasoned with spices
and wine, and sometimes eaten with sugar.

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 5

The land, when selected, was cleared, by keeping up a fire
around the foot of each tree till its bark was so burned that it
would die. They then planted their corn. When a tree fell,
it was burned into pieces of such a length that they could be
rolled into a heap and burned to ashes. In this way, by de-
grees, a piece covered with wood, was wholly cleared. An
industrious woman could burn off as many dry fallen logs in a
day, as a strong man could, at that time, cut with an axe in two
or three. They used a stone axe, made much in the same way
as the hoe above described, to scrape the charred surface of
the logs, and hasten the burning. This mode of clearing was
common through the western part of the State. In the eastern
part, the tree was sometimes girdled with the axe, and thus
killed, was allowed to dry, and then burned by kindling a fire
around it, as above described.

They taught the settlers to select the finest ears of corn for
seed, to plant it at the proper time, and in a proper manner,
to weed it, and to hill it. They were accustomed to dig small
holes four feet apart, with a clumsy instrument, resembling the
one described, which, in the eastern part of the State, was
sometimes made of large clam-shells. Those living in the vi-
cinity of the sea-shore, put into each hole a horse-shoe crab or
two, upon which they dropped four, and sometimes six kernels
of corn, and covered it with the implement with which they had
dug the hole. In the interior, a few small fishes in each hill,
were used as a fertilizer. Beans were planted with the
corn after it had come up, and grew up supported by it.
Great attention was paid by them to the protection of their
growing crops. Nota weed was to be seen in their fields, and
the corn was carefully guarded against destruction by insects
and birds. To prevent loss by the latter, a small watch-house
was erected in the midst of a field of corn, in which one of the
family, often the oldest child, slept, and early in the morning
rose to watch the blackbirds. It was their universal custom
to hill the corn about two feet high, for its support, and spots
may often be seen at the present day, which were evidently
cultivated by them. ‘The colonists very generally imitated this
custom, and it has been continued down to our own times. The
men planted and cured their tobacco, which was, ordinarily,

6 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

the only plant they worked upon, the women managing all the
rest.

This very brief sketch of the agriculture of the Indians
would not be complete, without an allusion to their mode of
storing their winter supply. Large holes were dug in the
earth, and the sides carefully lined with bark. ‘This was also
the work of the women. The corn and the beans, after being
dried in the sun, or on racks or flakes over a fire, were thrown
into these holes, and then covered up level with the surface of
the ground. They were thus preserved, if necessary, through
the winter. These excavated barns were carefully concealed,
by the women, from their lazy husbands and sons, lest they
should discover and eat up all; yet, with all the care they could
take, the hogs of the colonists often unhinged their barn-doors,
and helped themselves to the golden treasure. History says,
that one of these Indian barns was discovered by the Pilgrims,
at a time when their store of grain was so reduced as to con-
tain but five kernels of corn to each individual.

In addition to this provision for winter, they sometimes made
large boxes of wicker-work, or bags or sacks of hemp, which
were filled and kept in the wigwam, for the more immediate
wants of the family. Grass they had no occasion to cut,
though it grew in great abundance along the marshes and the
rivers, and in places which had been cleared for cultivation.
It was of a coarse quality, yet it made the only hay used by
the colonists for some time after the settlement. .

To the rude implements used by the Indians, the colonists
added the plough. We may well imagine the surprise of the
natives at the first sight of a plough. They could not under-
stand so complicated a machine. They wanted to see it work,
and when it tore up more ground in a day than they, with their
clam-shells, could scrape up in a month, and they saw the col-
ter and the share to be of iron, they told the ploughman if he
was not the devil himself, he was very much like him.

The first sight of a ship, it will be remembered, had excited
their wonder even toa greater extent. To them it was a
floating island; its masts were nothing but trees; its sails
were clouds; its discharge of guns was thunder and lightning;

SECRETARY’S REPORT. T

but, as soon as the thunder and lightning ceased, they pushed
off their canoes to go and pick strawberries on the island !

After this cursory survey of the method of cultivating the
earth, in practice among the Pilgrims and their Indian neigh-
bors, we are better prepared to trace the progress of agricul-
ture down to the present day. It was, at first, the only pur-
suit of the settlers, and long continued to be their chief occu-
pation.

We have seen that poor and miserable cattle, poor and mis-
erable implements—yet both as good, perhaps, as the time and
their means afforded—and poor and miserable ideas of farming,
characterized the agriculture of the first English settlers.
Nothing was done which was not forced upon them by the
pressure of necessity. Their wants were so many, that it
required their most vigorous exertions to provide what was
indispensable, and they had no time to seek out new principles
of agricultural science or improvements in practical agricul-
ture.

The first few years were spent in extending the settlement,
exploring the country, and seeking for new and better lands.
In the space of thirty years, no less than forty small towns
were incorporated, of which Springfield was the most western.
An attentive observer is struck by the restless disposition to
move from place to place, even in the early days of the settle-
ment. Land new and rich in mould, the accumulation of ages,
did not require very careful cultivation, to secure an abundant
return. Buta few years of constant cropping exhausted its
productiveness. The proprietor could easily obtain other
lands, to, be subjected to the same process. He raised wheat
until the land became too poor, and then he raised corn; and
when it would no longer produce corn, he sowed barley or rye,
and so on to beans.

The number of intelligent cultivators was few, and for the
most part agriculture was in a state of extreme depression.
This state of things continued with little change, down to
the period of the Revolution. That it was so, will not appear
strange, when we consider that even in England, where land
was high, comparatively, and the demands for produce much
greater than here, there was, during the same period, none of

8 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

the interest and enterprise which have since changed the whole
face of the kingdom.

It should be mentioned, however, that in 1747, the Rev.
Jared Eliot, of Connecticut, began the publication of a series
of essays on farming, full of valuable suggestions, and marked
throughout, by a degree of intelligence and good sense far in
advance of his time. His experiments in draining, and in the
improvement of salt marsh, are among the earliest attempts at
real progress in the country.

But with very few exceptions, there was no spirit of inquiry
to give a charm to agricultural labor, and it was performed
by the farmer as an evil which must be endured, from stern
necessity. Having no love for his occupation, he paid no
attention to the selection of the best stock, and the best
seeds. Owing to the imperfect provision for schools for the
great body of the people, the boy was trained up to a narrow
routine of labor, as his fathers had been for a century before.
He often affected to despise all intelligent cultivation of the
soil, and not only scrupulously followed the example of his
fathers, but also advised others to do the same; thus transmit-
ting to'us in the line of succession, the very practices which
had originally been derived from the uncivilized Indian.

The manner of settling new lands being such as has already
been described, it will be seen that the population must have
been scattered over a large extent of territory by the middle
of the last century. Ten counties had been incorporated, and
one hundred and forty towns. The proportion of the popula-
tion collected in the great centres at that time, was compara-
tively small. Boston contained less than fifteen thousand
inhabitants, and next to that stood Marblehead; but it might
almost be said, that in neither of these did the houses quite
shut out the woods and the fields; for in the former,—by far the
largest town in the State,—the space now occupied by the Com-
mon and the western slope of Beacon Hill, including all the
western part of the city, was used as a pasture for cattle.
The spots where some of our most flourishing towns and vil-
lages now stand, were then covered with a dense forest.

Few of the rural population of that day saw a newspaper or
a journal of any kind. At the commencement of the last cen-

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 9

tury there was not one published in the State, and in 1750
there were but four. The circulation of these was confined,
for the most part, to the metropolis; a few copies being sent
to clergymen in the country. There were but six in 1770, and
one of these was discontinued in June of that year, for want
of support. The facilities of travel were so limited that few
of the farmers ever went beyond the borders of their own
towns, unless it were to market. It will be seen, therefore,
that there was no opportunity of cultivating those larger and
more generous sentiments which now mark the progress of
civilization, and the spread of knowledge and intelligence among
the people. Obstinate adherence to prejudice of any kind, is
now generally regarded as a mark of ignorance or stupidity.
A century ago, the reverse was the case. In many a small
country town, a greater degree of intelligence than was pos-
sessed by his neighbors, brought down upon the farmer the
ridicule of the whole community. If he ventured to make ex-
periments, to strike out new paths of practice, and adopt new
modes of culture; or if he did not plant just as many acres of
corn as his fathers did, and that too in “ the old of the moon; ”
if he did not sow just as much rye to the acre, use the same
number of oxen to plough, and get in his crops on the same
day, or hoe as many times as his father and grandfather did; if,
in fine, he did not wear the same homespun dress, and adopt
the same religious views and prejudices, he was shunned
in company by the old and young, and looked upon as a mere
visionary. He knew nothing of a rotation of crops. With fire~
‘places adapted to make the largest quantity of ashes, he had:
no idea of their use, and would have sold them for the smallest
pittance in money. The use and value of manures was little
regarded. Even so late as within the memory of men still
living, the barn was sometimes moved away to get it out of the
way of heaps of manure, by which it was surrounded, because
the owner would not go to the expense of removing these accu-
mulations, and put them upon his fields.

The swine were generally allowed to run at large, the cattle
were seldom housed or enclosed at night, during the summer
months, the potato patch often came up to the very door, and
the litter of the yard seldom left much to admire in the looks

2

10 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

of the barn or the house. Men who suffered their cattle to run
loose in the summer nights, thought it necessary to let them
run at large very late in the fall, and to stand out exposed to
the severest colds of winter “to toughen.”. Orchards had been
planted in many parts of the State, but the fruit was mostly of
an inferior quality, and used mainly for the purpose of making
cider.

In the latter part of the last century many left the seaboard
and removed to the interior, to avoid the inconveniences aris-
ing from the difficulties between this country and Great
Britain, and other causes. More attention seems, then, to have
been paid to agriculture. The population had now -become
scattered over the whole State, and the whole territory had,
in 1790, been incorporated into towns or districts. Men had
begun to emigrate to the so-called inexhaustible West; which at
that time, meant Central or Western New York.

A few public spirited and patriotic men now began to see
the necessity of some such associated effort as should excite
the public mind to such action as would lead to the develop-
ment of the industrial resources of the State.

Up to this time, no journal devoted to agriculture had been
published in America, nor, indeed, to my knowledge, in Eng-
land. In the latter country, however, public interest had been
aroused, to some extent, by the success of Bakewell, in breed-
ing stock, and by the writings of Young and Sir John Sinclair,
under whose auspices the Board of Agriculture was estab-
lished, in 1793. The Dublin Society had been instituted as
early as 1749, and though it had but little influence at first, it
had contributed largely to the prosperity of that part of the
kingdom, by directing attention to this field of investigation.
The Highland Society of Scotland was formed in 1784, and
incorporated in 1787. These facts are mentioned to show that
this most important interest began to assert its claims nearly
at the same time in Great Britain and America.

The Massachusetts Society for the Promotion of Agriculture
was established in 1792. It was followed by a Similar society
in New York, incorporated the next year, 1793, having been
first formed in 1791. The Philadelphia Society had been
established in 1785. These societies were managed by men

SECRETARY'S REPORT. 11

of the most devoted zeal, but, owing, perhaps, to the state of
the times, to the fact that there was little or no disposition in
the community to examine the subject, or to a defective organ-
ization, they failed to excite any spirit of emulation in the
public mind. Not many years after their establishment, they
began to publish a small volume annually, for circulation among
the members. Of these volumes, those published by the
Massachusetts Society are deserving of special mention, as
containing many useful hints and valuable suggestions. A list
of premiums was also offered. An exhibition was held at
Brighton, by the Massachusetts Society, and a ploughing match
instituted, not so much with the object of improving the
plough, as of trying the strength and docility of the oxen.
The plough-maker, it is true, happened to be there, and saw
the defects of it, and since that day an amount of scientific
knowledge has been brought to bear upon this implement
sufficient to bring it very near perfection. *

The Kennebeck Agricultural Society was instituted at
Augusta in 1800, and incorporated in 1801. This was the
second society incorporated in Massachusetts, it being at that
time within the limits of this State. A voluntary Association
of the Middlesex Husbandmen, was formed in 1794, and
incorporated in 1803, under the name of the Western Society

* The plough, at that time, was nearly the same as that which had been used a
century before. Its form and size showed but little ingenuity, and gave evidence
only of a sufficient supply of timber. According to the ideas of farming then
prevalent, it answered the purposes very well, however. It was generally thought
that manure ploughed in, could not be kept too near the surface. They supposed
it was dissolved by the rains and carried down beyond the reach of the roots of
plants. While such opinions were entertained, there was, of course, no inclination
to subsoil, or plough deep. Either would have subjected the experimenter to ridi-
cule, for his waste of muscle and manure. This theory of ploughing prevailed
very extensively ; indeed, so tenacious are the prejudices of men, that it is not yet
wholly abandoned, though long since given up by all intelligent farmers. As a
further evidence of the limited information of farmers, at a comparatively recent
period, we may refer to the fact that it is not more than forty years since many of
them made it a rule to sow turnip, and other seed, only in the ‘old of the moon ;”’
and it was not till Arago had clearly demonstrated that the light of the moon had
no influence on vegetation, that this idea was wholly abandoned, even by scientific
men. It was believed, too, that the fertilizing power of gypsum was limited by
geographical lines, varying, not according to differences in soil, but according to
distance from the sea. .

12 ~ BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

of Middlesex Husbandmen. This name was subsequently
changed by the legislature, to the Society of Middlesex Hus-
bandmen and Manufacturers.

The Berkshire Society was incorporated in 1811, having
been suggested by the exhibition of three merino sheep, in
1810, under the great elm tree still standing in the public
square of Pittsfield. The projector of this Society encountered
the opposition and ridicule of all classes of society, from the
moment the proposition was made. It was at first viewed
by many, even with contempt. Gradually, however, the feel-
ings of the people were enlisted in its favor, premiums
were offered and awarded, and a large concourse from all parts
of the county, increasing rapidly from year to year, showed
clearly that something had reached the heart of the community.
The Essex, the Worcester, and the Hampshire Franklin and
Hampden Societies, were incorporated in 1818, and the
Plymouth in 1819.

It may be remarked that all the County Societies, previous
to 1820, suffered much from the unjust criticism and ridicule of
the class they were intended to benefit. Thanks to the intel-
ligence which our common schools have so widely diffused,
farmers are now among the first to appreciate every well meant
effort. Under the auspices of the government, which came
to the aid of these societies in 1819, so great an impetus has
been given to the improvement of our agriculture, that the
entire aspect of the State has been changed since then.

The period of thirty years, succeeding 1790, deserves a
passing remark. In it occurred the second war with Eng-
land, which produced a gencral stagnation of business. The
unprecedented successes in the East India trade, had cre-
ated an unnatural excitement in many parts of the State.
Tales of hitherto unheard of fortune, tempted the young to
forsake the country, the plough and the homespun dress, and to
look with contempt upon the occupation of their fathers.
Farming, indeed, had never been made attractive to them.
Their fathers had always been half ashamed of it, and they
could hardly be expected to feel any regard for it. It had few
claims when compared with the occupations whose magnificent
results their excited imagination was continually picturing to

SECRETARY'S REPORT. 13

them. The retailer of tape and teas, the drawer of liquor
behind the counter, the shoer of horses, had always had in
their mind, a rank above the laborer on the farm, and it was
not to be supposed that a position in the counting-room, and
the prospect of wealth, would leave them at ease on the acres
which had been moistened by the sweat of their fathers.
Agriculture, therefore, had fallen into disrepute, and the
young and ambitious sought distinction, wealth and power in
other occupations. The embargo in 1807, though a serious dis-
aster to many flourishing seaport towns, which were nearly
ruined by it, and have never since wholly recovered, was, with-
out doubt, a great advantage to the agricultural interests of
the State. Intelligent men began to turn their attention in
this direction, and often invested their capital in agricultural
operations. These individuals, in many cases, were men who
had travelled extensively, and seen the improvements intro-
duced abroad; merchants, disheartened by the uncertainties
of commerce, who brought into the country a cultivated taste ;
sea captains, whose observation and acquaintance abroad had
made known new fruits or new breeds of cattle. Some of
the vessels taken and brought into our ports, had on board
superior animals designed for Canada. They were left, of
course, in the vicinity, and to this day, the descendants of Here-
fords, so taken, may be seenin some parts of eastern Massa-
chusetts. These men, it is true, often spent vast sums of
money in building the noble mansions which now adorn many
parts of the country, and in farming experiments, in which they
not unfrequently failed; but they showed their less affluent
neighbors what could be done, and there can be no doubt that
they largely contributed to the progress of agriculture. The
war, and the failures consequent upon the reaction in the tide
of affairs, did still more to put a timely check to the tendencies
above alluded to.

The noble efforts of patriotic men, many of whom were
connected with the oldest agricultural society in the State, also
did much to effect a change in public sentiment. They saw,
they could not help seeing, the consequences to which these
perverted sentiments would lead. They perceived the evils
that must inevitably arise from that morbid refinement which

14 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

would cast into contempt an occupation on: which all classes
depend,—a refinement not less dangerous to the Common-
wealth, than it is contemptible in the individual who cherishes
it,—and labored zealously to remove it. The change produced
in popular feeling by the various causes above referred to, re-
sulted in the increased number, prosperity and influence, of the
County Agricultural Societies. The State, too, began, in 1819,
to lend some efficient aid to the advancement of its first great
industrial pursuit, while the growing demand for raw material
for manufacturing purposes, opened a home market—the best
of all markets—to the farmers of the State.

The progress of the agriculture of the State for the last
thirty years has been more marked. The general diffusion of
some degree of scientific knowledge, and the great increase of
the number of readers in the community, have undoubtedly
contributed largely to it, while the good effects of associated
effort are too striking to be overlooked, and are now univer-
sally acknowledged. At the commencement of this period, a
restless and unsatisfied desire of change was doing much to
unsettle the minds of men, in all parts of the State. It tended
to prevent all permanent improvements on land, as men feared
that they might never be paid for their labor, and felt that their
children would not stay at home to reap the benefit of it. This
feeling was not by any means difficult to account for. It was
the legitimate successor of the short-sighted policy which had
led the farmers of an earlier day to work merely to satisfy
present necessity, and keep off absolute starvation, without
regard to the comforts and hopes of the future. The injurious
effects which resulted from these narrow and selfish views,
cannot now be estimated. They were completely destructive
of that enterprise and desire for improvement in young men,
which a different feeling, on the part of those who had gone
before them, would have cherished and encouraged. The far-
mer’s sons were, sometimes, even trained up with the idea that
the farm was to be sold. They had little inducement to sow
where they could never expect to reap. The disastrous season
of 1816 had, perhaps, contributed somewhat to discourage the
farmer. Evils came in quick succession. Not a month occurred
in which there were not frosts. The crops were blighted, and

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 15

in many instances, destroyed, by an insect whose ravages were
extensive.

The culture of Indian corn fell at once into disrepute, as an
uncertain crop, and it was only by slow degrees that it came
again to be a favorite of the farmer. Gradually, however,
things began to assume a brighter aspect. As an evidence of
the progress which has since been made, it is only necessary
to allude to the number of acres of waste and unimproved
lands, in all parts of the State, which have been reclaimed to
fruitfulness and beauty; to the many noble farms whose pro-
ducts have been doubled and trebled; to the comparative
freedom from mortgages in the country; and to the evidence,
now everywhere seen, of the enterprise, the energy and intel-
ligence of the people. If the rate of progress, indicated by a
comparison of the returns of 1840 and of 1850, should con-
tinue, it would take but little more than thirty years to bring
all our waste lands capable of improvement, under some degree
of cultivation. Probably for each year in the future, we may
calculate on an advance equal to that of any one former year,
on account of the increasing population and wants of the State,
and the continually growing interest felt in the subject. The
conviction is fast gaining strength, that these lands, many of
which are low, wet swamps, will be more profitable than any
other in the State. To this marked progress, the agricultural
societies have, undoubtedly, largely contributed. The older
societies have already been alluded to. The Bristol Society
was incorporated in 1823, the Barnstable and the Hampden
in 1844, the Housatonic in 1848, the Norfolk in 1849, the
Hampshire and the Franklin in 1850, and the Worcester West
in 1851. ,

In 1852, the Board of Agriculture was established, by an
Act which provided that “All the duties of the Secretary of
the Commonwealth, relating to returns of Agricultural Socie-
ties, shall be performed by the Secretary of the Board of Ag-
riculture.”

A Secretary was appointed in January, 1853, who entered
upon his duties in the course of the February following.
Though he had long been familiar with the details of practical
farming, the duties of the office were, for the most part, new,

16 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

and of a responsible nature. They were sufficient to occupy
his whole time in the labors of the office, and, at the same time,
he was expected to visit all sections of the State, and become
familiar with their wants and necessities. It will be seen that
the duties are of a two-fold character, and must, therefore, give
rise to much difficulty, till some provision is made for perma-
nent assistance in the work of the office.

When the present Secretary entered on the performance of
his duties, the State had, for some years, been paying, in boun-
ties, a sum which had annually increased till it exceeded nine
thousand dollars. It seemed to be very important, if this
practice was to be continued, to arrange some uniform system
of returns, in order that the manner in which all these bounties
were appropriated might be understood at a glance. It was
impossible to perfect the details of the system the first year.
Great care was taken, to prepare such blanks, to be used by
the officers of all the societies, as would show the extent of
the permanent funds of each, and the mode of investment, the
manner in which the income was expended, the comparative
amount of premiums paid on each article throughout the State,
and the extent of the influence of each society; the last being
indicated by the number and names of the towns in which pre-
miums were awarded, and the amount paid to each. These
requisitions have been fully and promptly complied with, by
the Secretaries of all the Societies in the State, so far as it
was in their power, and the result has been very gratifying.
Many improvements in the blanks have already suggested
themselves, and it is hoped that a complete system of agricul-
tural returns will soon be made, by which the proceedings of
each county will be so brought to the knowledge of the citizens
of other parts of the State, as to be of interest and instruc-
tion to all.

Special care has been taken, to effect a general and judicious
distribution of the volume of Agricultural Transactions, annu-
ally published by the State. Copies have been sent directly
to the small and remote towns, many of which had no repre-
sentative and no express, to men who read it with interest,
and who desire to improve by the practice and experience of
others. It has thus been put into the hands of very many

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 17

who could not, otherwise, have obtained it without great diffi-
culty.

A correspondence has been opened, and an interchange of
publications established, with most of the States which have
Societies encouraged by the government. A direct system of
exchange has also been established with the Bureau of Agri-
culture, of France, from which a very valuable collection of
books has already been received. Copies of our own publica-
tions have been sent in return. The mutual interchange of
kind offices between different governments, should be a source
of just pride to the citizens of each, and must, necessarily, be
an advantage to both.

The importance of obtaining full and accurate agricultural
statistics is too obvious to need comment. As yet, no plan
has been devised, by which it has been possible to arrive at
satisfactory results. To meet this great want, in some measure,
the following circular was sent to men of good jugdment in
every town in the State; and the returns have been such, that
from them, with the aid of the results of much observation
throughout the State, and other sources of information, we
may obtain a tolerably clear idea of the present condition of
the Agriculture of Massachusetts :—

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS.

Board-of Agriculture, Secretary's Office,
Boston, Sept. 1st, 1853. :
Dear Sir :—

I desire to obtain from each town in the State, such facts
and statistics as will enable me to make an accurate statement
of the present condition of our agriculture.

Any aid which you may be able to render me, either of your
own knowledge, or by interesting other intelligent and observ-
ing men to furnish me with the desired information, will be
gratefully acknowledged.

Your attention is more particularly called to the following
inquiries, with such other suggestions and observations as may
be interesting and useful to your town, and to the friends of
agricultural improvement throughout. the State :—

3

18 BOARD _OF AGRICULTURE.

1. What are the chief products of your town?

2. The estimated number of acres devoted to each?

3. The average yield per acre of grain and Indian corn?

4, What attention is paid to raising field crops of beets,
carrots, ruta-bagas, &c., and what is the average yield per
acre, of each?

5. What is the average yield per acre of English hay ?

6. The increase per acre, within the last ten or fifteen years,
arising from improved cultivation, or from reclaiming meadow
and waste lands?

7. The estimated number of acres of reclaimed land?

8. Is there an increasing or decreasing number of acres in
tillage ?

9. Is there an increasing or decreasing number of acres in
pasturage ?

10. Is the value of farm land increasing or decreasing ?

11. What is the estimated per cent., realized on the value of
farms, and the capital invested in the management of the same?
> 12. The estimated number of acres of woodland, and the
average value per acre ?

13. The estimated rate of increase or decrease of wood-
land ?

14. What manures are chiefly used, and how applied? What
attention is paid to composting, and what is believed to be the
most profitable mode of doing it?

15. What per cent. increase of manure might be made on
your farms, with reasonable care, and by what means ?

16. What degree of attention is paid to the breeding of
stock ?

17. What breed of milch cows and working oxen is most
esteemed ?

18. What is the average quantity per day, of milk and of
butter from a single animal of each breed of cows?

19. What is the number of full-blooded animals of each
breed of horses, cows, sheep, swine, &c. ?

20. What are the principal breeds of sheep, and what is
their average value per head?

21. What are the breeds of swine most esteemed, and the
comparative value of each?

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 19

22. Is it supposed that pork can be raised with profit in
your town?

23. What is the amount of tobacco raised in your town?

24. What quantity of cranberries is annually gathered ?

25. What attention is given to the cultivation of cranberries,
and what is the estimated yield per acre of the cultivated and
uncultivated ?

26. What quantity of broom corn is raised ?

21. What attention is given to the cultivation of fruit, and
with what result on the increased profits of the farm ?

28. The estimated proportion of native and foreign laborers
employed on your farms, and what is the average pay to each
class per month ?

Will you oblige me by answering as fully as possible before
the first of November?

Very respectfully, your obedient servant,
CHaries L. Fiint,
Secretary of the Board of Agriculture.

It is gratifying to say, that the request for information from
the various towns, has been very generally complied with; and
the answers received from different parts of the State have
been of essential service to me.

The great staple products of the State are already well
known. The first to which attention is called, is, of course,
the noblest of them all—Indian corn. In the numerous letters
received in answer to the above circular, there is a singular
coincidence of opinion, that farmers in the different sections of
the State now cultivate less land, but do it better than formerly,
under the impression that good crops from small pieces well
tilled, are more profitable than the same crops would be from
larger surfaces imperfectly cultivated. This opinion shows, at
least, an encouraging change in public sentiment, and might,
perhaps, be strikingly corroborated by statistics obtained both
officially and by private inquiry.

INDIAN CoRN.

It appears from the returns of 1840, that there were 1,775,-
074 bushels of Indian corn raised that year in the State; while

20 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

in 1850, the number of bushels had risen to 2,295,856, making
an increase of 520,782 bushels in the ten years preceding 1850,
or an average annual increase of about 52,078 bushels. Unfor-
tunately, the number of acres devoted to this crop were not
returned, and we cannot, therefore, arrive at a direct and
reliable result. The number of acres of tillage land, during
the same ten years, had increased from 259,038 to 300,269,
or at the rate of about 4,000 acres annually. But allowance
should be made for the increase in the number of actual
cultivators, which in some localities has been considerable.
From other sources, also, it has been ascertained with tol-
erable certainty, that the average yield at that time was not
greater than from twenty to twenty-five bushels per acre,
while the average yield at the present time cannot be less
than thirty bushels per acre; and in the judgment of most
of those who have expressed an opinion on the subject, it is
at least thirty-five bushels per acre. The yield for the last
season was greater than usual. It is thought by the best
judges, to be at least ten per cent. greater, and many would
say twenty per cent. greater than that of 1850. Kstimating
it, however, at only ten per cent., and we have raised the past
season, at least 2,525,441 bushels.

It is the opinion of many, fully capable of judging, that, con-
sidering our proximity to the market, and the various other
facilities at our command, we can afford to raise corn and put
it into the market, cheaper than it can be brought from the
West. Much of our land is well adapted to it. Within the
last ten years, probably larger crops have been raised than
were ever before known in the State. They have, at least,
shown what can be done, and the result has been highly benefi-
cial to many sections of the State.

A most intelligent and practical farmer of Plymouth County,
speaking of this crop, says :—*Indian corn is easily and prof-
itably raised, where proper attention is given to the cultiva-
tion. Less extensive fields are now planted than formerly,
but much more corn taken from the acre. The average yield
now, is probably about forty bushels to the acre. Many fields
are planted, which produce far less. Others, well prepared
and cultivated, yield from eighty to more than an hundred

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 21

bushels to the acre. Since experiments have been made, and
the results laid before the farmers, they have happily become
convinced that it is a poverty-smiting business to plant old
fields continually without dressing, and many of the poorest
fields are now left to grow up into forests.”

It may not be improper here to suggest the inquiry, whether,
instead of continuing to cultivate many of our old and worn-
out lands, particularly the light lands of Bristol, Barnstable,
and Plymouth, at a great outlay of labor which they require, it
would not be real economy to turn them to woodland, and
bring under cultivation new and stronger lands, now covered
with wood. Many such exhausted farms of light soil, and
almost entirely unproductive, now disfigure the surface of the
State; while lands directly adjoining, though in the main of the
game character, would bear respectable and remunerative crops
with far less labor. The mode by which waste lands of this
description are converted into woodland, will be alluded to
hereafter.

Indian corn has for some years gradually gained the confi-
dence of the farmers of this State, and has come to be consid-
ered as, on the whole, the most reliable and profitable crop
that can be raised on our soil.

A practical farmer, of Berkshire, writes as follows :—* Corn
is the best grain crop produced by our farmers, and they
have become more interested in the cultivation of this crop
than any other grain. I should judge that nearly one-half
of our soil was a clay loam; on this, we like deep plough-
ing, from six to twelve inches, according to the depth of the
soil before reaching the hard pan. We consider green sward
preferable for corn. If coarse manure is to be used, it is
thought best to plough it under, particularly on a clay loam
soil. After ploughing, the soil should be well pulverized.
Fine manure and compost are used in the hill, and broadcast.
No doubt the best ‘policy is to spread all manures, that the
strength may not be exhausted by the first crop; but it is the
practice of many of our best farmers to use fertilizers in the
hill. This gives the corn an early start and good nursing in
its infancy, and is of great advantage. Wood ashes are well
adapted to all kinds of soil; more valuable than they are

22 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

generally considered, and highly beneficial to the growth of
corn. Plaster is used on our light slate soil to good advan-
tage.

“ A compound, which is used by many of our growers of corn
to very great advantage, is made up of one-fifth hen manure,
one-fifth plaster, and three-fifths ashes, well mixed and left to
ferment. A small handful is put in each hill. We plant the
eight and twelve-rowed yellow corn, from the 15th to the 25th
of May, thirty-six hills to the rod, with four or five stalks in
each hill, according to the richness of the land. Most of our
farmers hill their corn; but, there is no doubt that working
the land level is altogether preferable, on account of droughts,
and the danger of disturbing the roots of hilled corn by
ploughing. It is reasonable to believe that an even surface of
land will receive the dew and rain more evenly than an uneven
surface.”

This mode of planting corn is more frequently preferred by
the best farmers than any other; that is to say, on green
sward left in the spring till nearly the time of planting, so as
to allow the grass to get started if possible, when long manure
is spread on the surface and turned under. It is thought
advisable, in all cases, to put a small portion of well decom-
posed manure in the hill. All plants receive some part of
their nourishment from the air after the leaves are well de-
veloped. It is important, therefore, that they should be well
and early started out of the ground, and have something
in the hill to supply them food, till the young roots are suf-
ficiently grown to run out in search of other materials in
the soil. The growth of the corn is far more rapid where half
or two-thirds of the manure only is spread and ploughed in;
the other half, or one-third, put in the hill. It is thought, also,
that the land is permanently improved by this method, or
much more likely to be, than if all the manure is put in the
hill.

Two good illustrations of these different practices came
under my observation during the past season, very near to each
other, though by different cultivators. One of them, spread a
very large and liberal allowance of manure, and ploughed and
tilled very thoroughly, with reference to offering the crop for

_ SECRETARY’S REPORT. 23

premium; yet without putting any manure in the hill. The
other, put as much on the piece, but used it all in the hill, ma-
nuring very richly. Neither obtained much more than a me-
dium crop. There could be little doubt if the plan pursued by
each had been slightly modified, the crop of both would have
been largely increased.

It is proper to remark, also, that the best farmers in other
sections of the State, are fast adopting the flat culture as the
most rational and the best; and chiefly, for the reasons stated
in the extract above. There is, also, another advantage in it;
that grass seed can be sown among the corn, if desired, in
August or September. This is sometimes done, and always
with success. If the cornis planted in spring with this inten-
tion, itis thought best to spread the manure as above described ;
plough and furrow, using concentrated manure, as guano, in the
hill. The corn is dropped upon it, and covered; the top of
the hill being in the furrow, below the surface of the ground.
The first hoeing raises the earth slightly up around the corn,
and the second, makes the surface perfectly level. But few
experiments of this kind have come under my observation, but
they have been, without exception, very successful; and it is
probable that this method of planting will be more generally
adopted, particularly on land subject to drought.

Hay.

Another very important crop, and one whose failure or suc-
cess must have great influence upon the prosperity of the
farming community, is that of hay. Scarcely any thing raised
in the State is of greaterconsequence. Onit depends largely,
or perhaps wholly, our success in the keeping and improvement
of stock. The severity of our winters requires us to use the
utmost care and foresight to guard against their effects, and
hay must always continue to be the article most relied on for
fodder for our cattle during the winter.

The necessity of a rotation of crops, is now generally
admitted; and many, in their practice, apply with more or less
discretion, the principles which late researches on this sub-
ject have established. This improvement, together with a
better acquaintance with the nature of soils, and the greater

24 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

attention paid to the study and preparation of manures, has
done a great deal to increase the productiveness of our lands;
but there is still room for much further advancement in this
direction. What we have done, is little, when compared with
what yet remains to be done.

The average yield of upland mowing land throughout the
State, was returned, in 1840, at three-fourths of a ton per acre.
The whole number of acres of such land, was 440,930. By the
returns of 1850, we find this number to have increased to
528,025. The yield, in 1840, was 467,537 tons, while in 1850,
it was 483,228; showing a small increase in the yield per acre,
making it nine-tenths of aton. The practice of reclaiming land
has become so general, even within the last five years, that it
is perfectly safe to assert that the yield is now somewhat
greater. The cities and large towns are fast growing in
population, and call for a more’ careful cultivation in their
vicinity. Experiments have excited interest and competition.
Land is better manured, and holds out better in grass. Ac-
cording to returns made to this department the past season,
from men as capable of judging as any, the average yield per
acre is 23} ewt., or about one ton and one-seventh. Making
all allowances for a favorable season and over statements,
we may set down the present average as not less than one
ton per acre.

An intelligent and practical farmer of Hampshire County,
speaking of this subject, says :—“ For ten or fifteen years past,
great improvements have been made in English mowing lands.
Such as were considered worthless then, have been so improved
as to produce the first quality of English grass, which will
yield from two to three tons of hay per acre. I should think
that quantity and quality had increased within fifteen years, at
least, one-third; some farmers think one-half. Many tons of
hay are sold annually at the neighboring manufacturing vil-
lages.”

Another, writing from Berkshire County, says :—“ Hay is a
large crop with us. The two years last past, have tried our
meadows very severely; the extreme drought of the first, and
the almost constant rains of the latter, have so operated, that
our average for this year will not at all compare with that of

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 25

former years. Our bottom lands, in a good season, can be.
depended upon for about two tons per acre; but many of them
will yield three or four tons. This yield is obtained without
any extra care, the deposits from the overflow of the Housa-
tonic, being the chief manure used, with the exception of a
little plaster. From the best information I can gather, I should
set down the average yield of our whole meadow land to be
about one ton and a half per acre.”

Another from the same county writes :—“ The average yield
of English hay, is one ton and a quarter per acre. Proba-
bly 25 per cent. increase from improved cultivation, within
the last’ ten or fifteen years. Several swamps have been
converted into excellent meadows.”

Another in Franklin County says:—* The average yield is
one ton and a half to the acre. Some of the best mowing land
produces four tons to the acre. The increase in fifteen years
is about one-third.”

Another practical farmer in Hampshire County, says :—
“Considerable attention is paid to reclaiming swamps for
mowing, which has greatly increased the amount of hay upon.
some farms. Within sight of where I am now sitting, there is
a tract of land, which, six years ago, bore nothing but brakes
and whortleberries, and which, by draining and ploughing, and
the addition of but little manure, now produces two loads of
good hay to the acre, and has paid its way during the process
of reclaiming, which we cannot always expect. There are.
hundreds of acres in the State, which would do the same.”

In Worcester County :—“ Average about one ton and a quar-
ter. A gradual increase per acre from year to year, for the
last. ten or fifteen years. From 1843 to. 1853, probably one-
eighth, or 123 per cent. increase.”

Another writer in the same county, says:— With many of
our farmers, the average yield per acre would be from thirty.
to forty hundred. The average, throughout the town, would
not be more than twenty hundred if it. exceeded fifteen hun-
dred.

“Swamp lands have been greatly improved, within the last
five years. They are regarded as the most valuable for grass,.
and are kept in a productive state, with the least expense. The.

4

26 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

mode of improving them is to thoroughly drain, then plough,
seed down with a top-dressing of compost, in which is a great
preponderance of loam, sand, or even gravel. Then top dress
once in three or four years. Herds-grass, redtop and clover,
are the seeds used. There are more than three hundred acres
of this kind of land improved. Grass has always been taken
from this land, but of poor quality.”

In Norfolk County, an intelligent and practical farmer
writes :—“ English hay is extensively cultivated, and considered
the most profitable crop raised. As the soil is well adapted
to it, and much of the land in a good state of cultivation, the
average yield is probably one ton and a half to the acre.
Within the last ten or fifteen years, much time and attention
have been given to draining and improving meadow and waste
land; much of which was almost worthless, but now produces
a very valuable crop, and probably the increase is one-half.”

Such is the weight of the testimony, in many parts of the
State; and what gives credit to it, is the fact, that writers in
the same localities, as in adjoining towns, without any concur-
rence or connection, in many cases, singularly confirm the judg-
ment of eagh other; in other localities the evidence would lead
to a different conclusion as to an increase in the yield.

A distinguished practical farmer, writing from Worcester
County, says :—* The average yield, per acre, is one and a half
tons. The increase, for the last ten or fifteen years is not
much. There has been some improvement in cultivation, but
the deterioration of the land has probably kept pace with the
improvements, and the hay crop is the same as ten years ago.”

In Essex County, one fully competent to judge, says :—“ The
average yield, per acre, of English hay, varies much with the
season. In a good year, about a ton to the acre. In some
years not over half that. One or two opinions place it as high
as a ton and a quarter in a good year. Perhaps the eight hun-
dred acres may be set down as producing one thousand tons.
This is the principal article marketed. It is the object to
keep as much land as possible in mowing.

«The increase of hay, by reclaiming meadow lands, has been
very considerable in the time of the present generation,—say
twenty to thirty years. In this time, it may be estimated at

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 27

one-fifth, perhaps; but, confining the question to the time
named, it would be but a small proportion of this increase.
Probably there is no increase of this article from improved
cultivation, nor of other farm products, from this or from either
way named.”

So in Plymouth County, an eminent writer says :—‘“ The ay-
erage product of hay is probably about one ton to the acre.
On some well-cultivated fields, from two to three tons are
taken; but many old fields are mowed where the yield is less
than half a ton. English meadows have not been increased
in the last fifteen years, and less hay is made now than for-
merly. This diminution may be accounted for partly, by the
increasing mechanical pursuits, and partly by the partial failure
of several domestic markets, since the establishment of rail-
roads.”

In Bristol County, the evidence is to the same effect. One
correspondent says:—“ One ton of English hay, per acre, is
considered an average yield, though some farms average more
than double that, but there are more that produce less. The
increase, for the last ten years, has been but a little, though
some farmers have doubled their crops, and more than that on
an average; others have fallen off.”

The reason of this is given, as follows :—“ But little atten-
tion has been paid to reclaiming land; most farmers think it
better to let the swamp and very rough land come into wood.
A few have paid some attention to it, and find it pays well; but
most farmers say they cannot afford it, labor is so high. I am
of the opinion, that not more than two hundred acres have
been reclaimed.”

In Barnstable County, a writer says:—“The average yield
of a single crop of English hay, we conclude, will fall some-
thing short of one ton to the acre. Yet some have small
fields, that yield two tons to the acre, and a second crop in
addition.” |

So in Middlesex: “Our most intelligent farmers think that
fifteen hundred weight is a fair average, per acre.”

These extracts might be multiplied, if it were necessary.
They are not introduced, in any case, as showing the produc-
tiveness of the whole county, but only of particular. localities

28 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

or towns. Upon the whole, after a careful consideration of
the official returns, and of the testimony of the most competent
individuals in all sections of the State, one is forced to the
conclusion that the increase has been but slight, and that the
average yield of this crop, per acre, does not much, if at all,
exceed one ton, though, as one very sensible correspondent
remarks, “No man who calls himself a good farmer, would
feel satisfied with that amount.”

In addition to the upland mowing, to which reference is
made, the number of acres of fresh, wet meadow, was estimated,
in 1840, at 184,822, yielding 135,930 tons of meadow hay;
while in 1850 it was 180,490, yielding 133,821 tons.

The salt marshes of this State are worthy of special men-
tion. Susceptible as they are to vast improvements, and at
reasonable expense, it is a subject of astonishment that they
are comparatively so much neglected. They produce, on an
average, little over three-fourths of a ton to the acre, a
large proportion of that being of inferior quality. It is be-
lieved that both quantity and quality may be greatly improved.

There are no less than 40,667 acres of salt marsh in this
State, as appears by official statistics, and these produce but
about 33,575 tons of hay! Situated as these marshes often
are, at a distance from the owner’s residence, often requiring
great labor to make and secure the hay upon them, they can
hardly be said to be of any real value in their present condi-
tion, the cutting, curing and carting home, costing more than
the value of the crop of hard and wiry hay, little relished by
the cattle along the shore, which are obliged to consume a
large proportion of it.

There are other marshes, however, much superior to those,
very frequently met with, the hay from which is excellent, nu-
tritive, and much relished by animals fed upon it. To show
what may be done in this important line of improvement,
attention is respectfully called to the following statement from
a farmer of Norfolk County, whose marsh, of fifteen acres, is
situated on the Neponset River, in Dorchester. He says :—
“Tt was owned, for many years, by one of the best farmers
in the county, (now deceased,) who expended nothing to improve
its value. It was similar to other marshes in the vicinity, that

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 43)

never had been ditched. I purchased it in 1840, which year it
produced rather less than half a ton, per acre, of poor, short,
wiry hay, worth but little more than the cost of cutting and
curing. In the autumn of that year, I hired faithful laborers,
well skilled in the business, to cut ditches over the whole lot,
two rods apart, eight inches wide and three feet deep; the sods
taken out, were laid in piles, to prevent the tide from washing
them away. The two following winters, they were taken upon
a sled to the cattle-yard, where they remained until the roots
of grass contained in them were decayed, so as to break in
pieces readily. For manure, and as an absorbent, they are as
valuable as the best of meadow muck or peat.

“T paid for ditching the entire lot, ninety dollars; more than
one hundred cords of sods were dug out and carted away,
which I consider worth as much to me, as the sum paid for
ditching. They were placed in the barnyard, in a compact
form, to insure a proper degree of moisture and cause ‘a speedy
decomposition, and afterwards mixed with animal manures.

“Three years after ditching, the produce was double—full
one ton per acre, was cut, of an improved quality, since which
it has annually increased. This year the produce, as estimated
by good judges, was two tons per acre, including about five
tons of second crop, cut from the best part of the marsh. As
an evidence of the quantity cut this year, I would state, that
the produce has been sold for three hundred dollars in cash,
after the owner had used nearly one ton for feed for his cows,
the purchaser agreeing to take it at the barn where it is now
‘stored.

“T consider salt hay, when cut from marshes that have been
ditched, where the grass is thick and the yield large, to be
worth as much as the average of upland hay; that cows thrive
as well, and give as much milk, as when fed with herds-grass
and clover hay.

“Tt is my belief, that all marshes can be made more produc-
tive by thorough draining, at a very small expense. I intend,
next autumn, to cut ditches upon my own marsh, between those
heretofore made. My opinion is unchanged, that the sods are
worth as much as the expense of ditching, when within one.
mile of the farm where they are to be used.”

30 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

When such improvements as these may be effected at so
little cost, compared with such results, it is to be hoped that
the salt marshes along the eastern shore, will be no longer
neglected.

It may be remarked, that the comparative value of salt hay,
as stated in the above communication, is considerably higher
than the general estimate. How far the improvement in qual-
ity, and the use of it in connection with other hay, may justify
this estimate, will be left for the reader to judge.

WHEAT.

Some parts of the State are still devoted to the raising of
wheat. It is well known that this was formerly an important
crop, and extensively cultivated. The quantity produced has
decreased gradually for some years. In 1840, this crop in
Massachusetts amounted to 101,178 bushels, while in 1850, it
was reduced to 28,487 bushels; showing an average annual
decrease of about 9,269 bushels. In those parts of the State
where it is still raised, however, it seems to be a remunerative
crop. The average yield per acre is stated at 173 bushels,
while in many localities it is 20, and even 25 bushels per
acre.

The yield in the western part of the State, and indeed in all
parts of the State where it is still cultivated to any extent, is
greater at present than it was in 1838, in competition for the
bounty of the Commonwealth. It should be borne in mind,
however, that the season of 1838 was remarkably unfavorable,
on account of the extreme drought, and that the crop of wheat
was universally affected by it.

That the cultivation of wheat can be made reasonably profit-
able in this State, there is little room to doubt, after the full
and reliable statements which have often and recently been
made. Yet many farmers think that they cannot raise it for
sale, so as to compete with the western farmers, whose soils
are supposed to be naturally better adapted to this crop. On
the other haffd, it is said, that the soil of this State was
originally well suited to it; and that, by treating it properly,
good and remunerative crops may still be obtained.

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 31

RYE.

The amount of rye raised in the State, in 1840, was 453,705
bushels. In 1850, it was 441,208 bushels. This crop has been
cultivated in Massachusetts from an early date. It was intro-
duced in 1632-3, and at that time, cultivated on a very small
scale. Wheat was then raised only in gardens, and even there
it was very rare; though in the course of ten years, it was
found to succeed so well as to lead to the proposition to export
it largely to England.

The rye crop has greatly risen in favor, in some localities,
within the last few years. It is even thought by some, to be
the most profitable on the farm. This is undoubtedly, in part,
owing to the high price of straw, during the past two or three
years, making the profit from that alone, equal, or nearly equal,
to the price of the rye itself.

The opinions and the experience of individuals differ so
widely, that it would not be possible to give any statement of
the comparative profits of this, and other grains, which would
be of universal application and value.

The average yield per acre, throughout the State, as returned
to me the past season, is but 144 bushels, though more of it
seems to have been raised than in 1850.

BaRLeY.

The average yield of barley in the State, is about 21 bushels
per acre; but it is not so much cultivated as rye. The number
of bushels returned to the Valuation Committee, in 1840, was
149,004 bushels; in 1850, it was 117,441 bushels, showing a
falling off in ten years, of about 31,563 bushels.

Oats.

A smaller quantity of oats also is raised in this State, than
formerly. In 1840, it was about 1,226,300 bushels, while in
1850, it was 1,210,238 bushels; showing a decrease of 16,062
bushels in ten years.

The yield of the last season averaged about thirty bushels to
the acre.

32 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

From the facts which have been stated, it will be seen, that
wheat, rye, barley and oats, are much less cultivated now than
they were twelve or fifteen years ago. The same may be said
of potatoes, as will appear hereafter. This decrease may be.
accounted for, by the greater attention paid to some other
crops, and affords further evidence of the direction which the
labor of our farmers is taking. Indian corn and hay are the
only crops yet mentioned, which have increased to any consid-

erable extent in this Commonwealth.
é

POTATOES.

There are no means of obtaining any exact information in
regard to the potato crop of the State. It was not included
in the returns of 1840 or 1850, and we can judge of it only
from the letters received in answer to the inquiries made by
me. From these, we find that, in the whole State, the number
of acres devoted to potatoes, is less than one-half, or more
nearly, about one-third of the number of acres devoted to corn.
If we estimate the quantity of the latter, raised the past year,
at 2,525,441 bushels, which probably is not far from the truth,
and allow 35 bushels to the acre, we have about 72,155 acres
of corn land. Supposing one-third as much land to be planted
with potatoes, we have about 24,051 acres devoted to this crop.
At the rate of 100 bushels per acre, which is probably rather
below the average, we have 2,405,100 bushels of potatoes, as
the yield of the State. This estimate, of course, is only an
approximation; but so far as we can judge from the information
which we have, it must be very nearly correct.

Most farmers place but very little reliance on this crop. So
extensive were the ravages of the disease to which it has been
liable for a few years past, during the last season, that it is
likely to receive even less attention hereafter, than it has here-
tofore. This disease has baffled all the efforts, both of scien-
tific and of practical men. Almost every individual who has
investigated the subject, has advanced a theory of his own,
respecting it. Each of these theories has more or less of
plausibility, but unfortunately, when they are tested by experi-
ment, it is found that the true cause of the disease is yet to be
discovered.

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 33

So much interest is now felt in the subject, however, that
some satisfactory result will probably be arrived at finally.

The phenomena connected with the disease, are often of a re-
markable and striking character. In one instance, during the
past season, the potatoes were sent off to market in a state of
apparent soundness, to the great satisfaction of the owner.
Before they had reached their destination, which was but a few
miles distant, the whole load had become one putrified mass.
In some single cases, which have come within my observation,
there has been a loss to the owner of nearly one thousand dol-
lars, from this cause alone.

‘Without attempting to explain facts which have baffled
the research of men far better fitted for the investigation than
myself, it may yet be allowed me to suggest that it would be
well to use less of the green ammoniacal manures, which have
so generally been applied to the potato. It has been said
that the natural vigor of the plant has been destroyed by the
unnatural treatment it has received; and though this may not
be the direct cause of the disease, it renders the plant more
liable to be effected by those sudden atmospheric changes
which are thought to precede its appearance. This seems not
wholly improbable, and further experiments in propagating
from the seed, instead of the tuber, and in furnishing the plant
with a larger supply of potash, by the use of wood ashes, may
yet lead toaremedy. The territorial extent of the ,disease
may be seen from the reports of individuals in different parts
of the State. One writing from the southern part of Berk-
shire, says :—“ Potatoes have generally been with us a good
crop; this year, on account of the rot, they have done badly.
Our farmers raise from one to three acres each, with an aver-
age yield of about one hundred bushels per acre.”

In another part of the same county, on the ridge of the
Green Mountains :—“ Potatoes, before the rot, gave an average
yield of two hundred bushels or over, and a profitable crop to
feed, or sell at one shilling per bushel. Late years, a very
uncertain crop. This year, an average of less than sixty
bushels per acre. Mine have cost me fifty cents per bushel,
and it is all they will sell for.”

In the western part of Worcester County, it is said :—“ The

5

34 BOARD_OF AGRICULTURE.

average yield of potatoes is about one hundred bushels to the
acre, for the past year. They are usually planted, since the
rot commenced, on dryish land, and without manure.”

In Middlesex :-—“ Not so many potatoes cultivated now as
formerly, on account of the rot.”

And in another part of the county, a correspondent writes :
“Potatoes do not yield more than half as many bushels as
they did from thirty to fifty years ago. From one hundred to
one hundred and fifty bushels to the acre, for seven years past,
have been as many as old lands would average. <A neighbor
told me that he produced, in 1852, five hundred bushels to the
acre on reclaimed swamp land, where the mud was from two
to ten feet deep—an inducement for others to try to do like-
wise.”

It must be evident that the potato crop has not only greatly
diminished in quantity throughout the State, the decrease being
caused, no doubt, by a want of confidence in it, and a conse-
quent disinclination to cultivate it; but the yield, per acre,
where it is still planted, is much less than it was ten or twelve
years ago. The yield in Great Barrington, for instance, fifteen
years ago, is stated to have ranged from one hundred and
seventy-five to three hundred and twenty bushels to the acre,
while it is returned by reliable men as having been only about
one hundred bushels for the past season. The same differ-
ence is found in many other towns, and the returns generally
confirm the opinion expressed above.

Root Crops.

A striking feature in the present state of our agriculture, is
neglect of the root crops as farm products. In some sections,
it is true, a few fields of carrots, turnips, onions, or mangel-
wurzel, are to be found, but they are not often seen to any
extent, and for the most part, farmers raise them only in suffi-
cient quantities to supply the family wants. It seems impos-
sible that this neglect can arise from ignorance of the value of
root crops as food for cattle. It is well known that the fatten-
ing properties of some of the roots, are very considerable, as is
also the effect which they have in increasing the quantity of
milk given, while their occasional substitution for the fodder

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 35

more commonly given to stock during the winter, is admitted
to be conducive to the health of the animal.

Perhaps it may be more properly ascribed to the labor
required for their successful cultivation. In many instances,
this is, undoubtedly, a serious obstacle, and yet if these crops
were fully appreciated, this objection would not be allowed to
outweich their advantages.

The amount of nourishment contained in the various articles
used as food for cattle, is now tolerably well ascertained ;
though from the nature of things, as the difference in climate
and temperature in which they come to maturity, and other
causes, there must, of course, still be some degree of uncer-
tainty about it. From recent experiments, very carefully and
skilfully made, it appears that two pounds of raw potatoes
afford as much nourishment as one pound of good English hay.
So three and two-fifths pounds of beets, or three and one-half
pounds of ruta-bagas with the leaves, or three pounds of carrots,
are of the same value as one pound of the same hay. Thus,
if we suppose an animal to require twenty-four pounds of hay
per day, the place of half that amount of hay, or twelve
pounds, might be supplied by twenty-four pounds of raw pota-
toes, or thirty pounds of carrots, or forty-two pounds of ruta-
bagas with the leaves, or by sixty pounds of turnips with the
leaves; with either of these equivalents, the animal would be
equally well fed. This calculation, of course, supposes the
articles used to be of ordinarily good quality.

If these nutritive equivalents are correctly stated, it would
be easy to show the economy of a more extended use of root
crops.

If we assume eighteen tons, or about seven hundred bushels
of carrots as the product of an acre, which for a good season,
and with good culture is a small yield, we have from this one
acre, what is equivalent to six tons of hay. Somewhat similar
results will be shown by an examination of the relative value
of hay and other roots. Land devoted to carrots would
undoubtedly require more labor than the same extent of mow-
ing land; and yet, with the aid of boys in weeding, or with the
simple and cheap implement, called the onion weeder, so
admirably contrived as to enable the operator to weed care-

36 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

fully and well, a large extent may be cultivated at compara-
_ tively little cost.

The returns show what attention has been paid to the cul-
ture of root crops, and give the results. A correspondent in
the county of Middlesex, writes thus :—“For a few years past,
there has been more attention paid to raising carrots for
stock, than formerly. We think they save about one-half the
grain necessary for working horses, and are preferred to ruta-
bagas for cattle. The average yield of carrots to the acre, is
about six hundred bushels.”

The yield in one or two instances in Norfolk County, is sta-
ted as follows :—* There is more attention than formerly, paid
to the cultivation of root crops. Yield of beets and mangel-
wurzel, 800 bushels; carrots, 800 bushels; ruta-bagas, 450 .
bushels; onions, 400 bushels; Norfolk turnip, 400 bushels;
parsnips, 400 bushels.”

In Berkshire County:—“Not much attention has as yet
been paid to the raising of carrots and other roots as a field
crop; some of our farmers have gone into it quite extensively,
and others, seeing the good resulting from it, are fast follow-
ing after.”

In Dukes County :—“But little attention is paid to raising
field crops of beets, carrots, ruta-bagas, &e. Average yield,
per acre, of beets, 500 bushels, and carrots 500.”

Another practical farmer writes :—“ Within five years some
attention has been given to raising carrots, and not much to
either of the others, beets or ruta-bagas. Yield of carrots
about 550 bushels per acre ;—this crop not so promising this
year as last; the tops die and turn black this year, like the
diseased potato vines.”

In Franklin County, a correspondent informs us that “There
is but little attention paid by our farmers to the cultivation of
field crops of beets, carrots, ruta-bagas, &e., though more than
formerly. The estimated average yield, per acre, is about 800
bushels. These crops might be profitably cultivated here, if
our farmers only understood the matter better, and would give
attention to them.”

In some parts of Essex County, the culture of roots has,
perhaps, received greater attention than in most other sec-

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 37

tions of the State. A correspondent, whose great observation
entitles his judgment to high consideration, writes as fol- ,
lows :—

“In reply to your inquiry, what are the crops chiefly culti-
vated on the lands in your vicinity, | beg leave to state: in

-addition to grass, and the various kinds of grain, much atten-
tion is given, of late, to the growing of vegetables—particu-
larly the onion. More money is annually realized from this,
than any other vegetable product. Not less than one hundred
thousand barrels are annually grown in this town, and sent to
market, chiefly to Boston, whence they are shipped in all direc-
tions. The product, to the acre, varies from three hundred to
seven hundred bushels—according to the attention given to
fertilizing and preparing the land for the crop. No product
demands greater care in the cultivation, or better rewards it
when applied. It is not uncommon for an individual to-realize
three hundred dollars and more, for his own labor in growing
this crop, in a single season. Excepting some of the herbs
and vegetables for the supply of the market, there is no crop
with us that pays better. This crop is not confined to this
town; many of the adjoining towns grow onions in large quan-
tities, though not so many as in Danvers.”

These extracts from different sections, show: how little
attention has been paid to the roots throughout the State.
They are comparatively little valued, and, with few excep-
tions, as field crops they are hardly cultivated at all.

This is regarded, by some, as one of the most agreeable
branches of husbandry, and the more it is followed the more it
will commend itself to the consideration of practical farmers
who are so situated as to be able to attend to it.

The root crops are so highly appreciated in England, that
their introduction has often been said to have created a revo-
lution in the agriculture of that country. Nearly three millions
of acres are annually appropriated to the turnip, and the annual
value of this crop amounts to nearly two millions of dollars.

38 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

Frvit.

Another characteristic of the agriculture of the present time,
as compared with that of a former period, is the much greater
attention now paid to the cultivation of fruit. The early set-
tlers made some attempts to introduce the best varieties of -
apples and pears known in the mother country when they left
it. For this. purpose, some brought with them the seeds of
these fruits, but, to their astonishment, they found that the
product of the trees which sprung from them was very differ-
ent from what they expected, and in many instances inferior to
the fruit from which the seed had been taken. They did not
understand how this could be, as they did not know that the
seedling is often inferior to the fruit whose seed is sown. *

Their progress in this department, as might have been ex-
pected, was’ slow; indeed we can hardly say that fruit was
cultivated at all as a part of the produce of the farm, and with
a view to profit, till a comparatively recent date. Half a cen-
tury ago it would have been impossible to find the number of
varieties of good fruit in the whole State, which may now be
found in a single town. There were orchards, it is true, and
some of them were better than none; but this is all that can
be said. Cider apples occupied a very prominent place in the
list. The Hubbardston Nonesuch, the Minister, the Porter, and
other favorite varieties, had then no existence. Not a nursery
containing trees for sale, was to be found in the State. Here
and there was an instance of grafting, but it was rare, and gen-
erally no thought was given to the subject. It was regarded
as absurd, for any but a young man to set out trees. An inci-
dent in the life of the venerable Mr. Cobb, of Kingston, not
inaptly illustrates the feeling which formerly prevailed to a
great extent throughout the State. At the age of seventy
years, he began the work of setting an orchard. The idea was
so ludicrous as to subject him to the ridicule of the neighbor-
hood. He lived to the age of one hundred and seven, and died

* The earliest fruit raised, was on Governor’s Island, in the harbor of Boston,
from which, on the 10th of October, 1639, ten fair pippens were brought, ‘ there
being not one apple nor pear tree planted in any part of the country, but upon that
island.”

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 39

in 1801, having enjoyed many years the fruits of his labors.
Grafted trees were now and then obtained from another State, ,
where somewhat greater attention had been paid to raising
them ; and a few orchards, nearly fifty years old, now bear some
good fruit, notwithstanding the neglect and abuse of subse-
quent owners.

In the cultivation of fruit on the farms of this State, with
reference to profit, the few great staple varieties are mostly
relied on, while the choicer and more delicate kinds, which re-
quire much time and care to bring them to perfection, are left,
for the most part, to the horticulturist, who is fully able to
supply the limited demand for them.

To make such fruits profitable to the farmer, he should deal
directly with the consumer. As things are, the producer often
gets less than his proportion of the price paid, while the con-
sumer, on the other hand, frequently pays far more than he ought.

It is the more common varieties of fruit, therefore, for which
there is, and always will be, a good demand, that are grown on
the farm.

Fortunately, the habits and character of these varieties are
now pretty well known, and the farmer can judge which of them it
is most for his interest to grow. He knows, for instance, that
certain apples, as the Baldwin, produce in alternate years, and
then very abundantly; so much so, indeed, that the market is
overstocked, and prices fall. The intelligent farmer would
naturally make his calculations with reference to these facts,
and avoid such casualties by selecting for his orchards such
apples as the Hubbardston Nonesuch, the Minister, or others of
equal value, which will find a ready sale when the Baldwin and
similar varieties are selling at the lowest prices.

The fact that these things sometimes occur, does not prove
that fruit is not profitable, as is sometimes argued. If any one
fails to make by it, he should rather consider it as an indica-
tion of some want of prudence or foresight on his part, and
though he may not be willing to see or acknowledge it himself,
it will still be evident to all who look on with a full knowledge
of the fruit market.

. To show how great attention is now devoted to this pleasant .

40 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

branch of rural economy, the following short extracts may be
given.

An intelligent farmer of Franklin County, writes as follows :—
“The cultivation of fruit is prospectively most important to
the farmer’s interest, and the farmers are just beginning to
learn it; there is no other way by which land can be made so
profitable as by raising fruit, and our land is well adapted to
the cultivation.”

The same may be said of some parts of the county of Wor-
cester, where “fruit of all kinds has, within the. last fifteen
years, received great attention, and been attended with most °
beneficial results, yielding to the farmer the most net profit of
any thing that he could cultivate. Choice apples are raised in |
great abundance—except this year, the new edition of worms
has produced almost an entire failure.”

Another* from the same county, writes :—“ Great attention
has been paid to the cultivation of fruit, particularly the
apple, within the last few years. The soil is peculiarly
adapted to fruit of all kinds, it being a deep yellow loam,
and the surface grealty diversified. Peaches are gen-
earlly, and in some instances, extensively cultivated. Pear
culture is receiving very much attention, and quinces are
raised, more or less, by every body. ‘With many farmers
the BEOEts of the farm have doubled within the last ten
years.”

In the sninity of Middlesex, also, the farmers are paying
greatly increased attention to this subject, and find it profitable
to do so. A correspondent writes as follows :—* Consider-
able attention is given to the cultivation of fruit. There
are some valuable old orchards, producing the Baldwin and
Hunt Russet in abundance. Great numbers of young apple
trees have been set within the last six years, and are receiving
excellent care by careful pruning and the cSnstant cultivation
of the ground. Garden fruits, such as peaches, pears, plums,
currants, gooseberries, blackberries and raspberries, have also
recently received a degree of attention unknown here, until
within a few years. There is no doubt among our cultivators
but that these fruits materially increase the profits of the
farm.”

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 41

From another town of the same county, the following return
was made, showing also the great attention which this subject
is receiving :—

“More attention is paid to fruit culture, than any other
branch of agriculture, and with great success—especially peaches,
which thrive exceedingly well here; about 5,000 bushels were
raised the past season. Apples, and other fruits do well. It
is generally considered, that fruit trees pay for themselves,
including care, cost of trees, &c., in about twelve years; and
I think a great part of the time bestowed on an orchard is

‘clear gain. All should plant an orchard who have land; I
can assure them more profit thereby, than from any other
branch of agriculture.”

In the county of Hampden, though less interest is felt in
fruit than in some other counties, it is now beginning to excite
attention. One practical farmer writes from there, as fol-
lows :—“ People have paid considerable attention to the culti-
vation of fruit, for afew years past, and I think with pretty good
success. I have done as much in the way of raising fruit, as
any man in our town, and I can say that I get more net profit
from my fruit, considering the labor, than from any other pro-
ducts of my farm. We are seventy miles from Boston; we
can pick our apples one day, and have them in Boston market
the next.”

The county of Norfolk is peculiarly adapted to the raising
of fruit, from the nature of its soil, its vicinity to the best of
markets, and the facilities which it has for selecting the finest
varieties. An intelligent, practical farmer, writes thus :—
“Much attention is given to the cultivation of fruit. A good
orchard of apples, in full bearing, would probably increase the
profits of afarm one-third; and where avariety of fruit is suc-
cessfully cultivated, the increase of profits would be one-half,
perhaps more.” @®

Another in Middlesex County, says :—“ Considerable attention
has been paid to the cultivation of fruit, particularly apples and
peaches. We send to the Boston and Lowell markets aboyt
six thousand bushels of peaches, and, in bepring.jeays, aout
six thousand barrels of apples.;, We, considers hay, fruit and
wood, more profitable than. any thing w¢ SaB WaAise/'einses\og

6

42 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

In Essex County, fruit has received “much attention. The
best kinds of apples, pears, peaches, plums and quinces are
raised in abundance.”

In this county, the cultivation of fruit is of early date. The
oldest pear tree in the State, still stands a constant bearer,
having been imported from England by the celebrated Govy-
ernor Endicott. Importations were then very rare, most trees
being propagated by the seed. This tree is now more than
two hundred years old. It is a Bon Chretien, though of infe-
rior quality. The exact date at which it was set out is not
known. The grant of the land on which it stands, was made’
to Governor Endicott in 1632; and, not many years after that,
he had a nursery of young trees not far from the spot where
this tree now stands. Some of these trees he is known to
have sold to his neighbors, who generally paid in land, the
price being sometimes, two acres a tree.

The St. Michael’s, St. Germain, Brown Beurré and some other
fine foreign pears were known and esteemed in this county
many years ago. These varieties were probably far better
when first introduced into the county, than they are at pres-
ent. In new lands and mild climates, they are ordinarily
better than in older soils and colder climates, where they are
apt to be inferior.

THE CRANBERRY.

The interest in this valuable fruit has become so general,
and the desire for information, now scattered and inaccessible
to the majority of inquirers, is so great, that particular atten-
tion has been given to the collection of all that can be useful
and valuable in regard to its natural history and cultivation.
With this view, nearly a hundred acres of cultivated cran-
berries have been visited in different sections of the State.

The cranberry is too well known in New England to need
description; but, it is so short a time since attention has been
called to its cultivation, that many qtestions connected with it
may be regarded as still unsettled.

Its Natural History.—There are two prominent and well
known species of this fruit ; the small or European, ( Orycoccus
palustris,) and the common American cranberry, (Oxycoccus

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 43

macrocarpus). This plant was formerly classed as one of
the whortleberry genus, (Vaccinie,) but is now considered
by many scientific men, as forming a group of four or five
species, of which, the two mentioned above, are most commonly
known.*

The roots of the small cranberry are creeping, with many
stems, which are very slender, wiry and trailing, with many
leafy branches. Its leaves are alternate, small, perennial,
somewhat oval, rolled back at the edges, erect on small stalks.
They are glaucous, or of a grayish color underneath. The
‘flowers are small, drooping, and very beautiful; each consist-
ing of four distinct petals rolled back at the base, of a deep
flesh color, on simple red stalks, which have two or more very
small, imperfectly developed leaves or bracts. The berries
of this species are small, being about as large as an ordinary
sized pea. In the early part of their growth, they are spotted,
very much like a sparrow’s egg, the spots being a little smaller,
but, finally, in favorable situations, turn to a deep red. They
have an acid taste, and are much used for tarts and jellies.
It delights in marshy bogs covered with moss. It grows in
great abundance in Russia, Sweden, Germany, and to some extent —
in Scotland and the north of England. It is also found in Nova

* There is a plant called the Highbush, or High Cranberry, ( Viburnum opulus, )
indigenous to North America, found on uplands in Maine, and along the St. John’s
River, and in some parts of Massachusetts. It is a beautiful shrub, sometimes ten
or twelve feet high, having a white blossom, and a fruit somewhat smaller than
the common cranberry, perfectly red, and of an acid taste, well adapted for tarts,
pies, &c., for which it is often used. The fruit differs from the common cranberry,
in having a small oblong stone instead of seeds. It is easily propagated by seeds,
layers, or cuttings, and is often found as a garden shrub, flourishing in every
variety of soil, sands and clays, wet and dry. Its berries grow in clusters and are
persistent through the winter.

The plant, called in Maine, the “‘ Mountain Cranberry,” (Vaccinium Vitis Idea, )
has leaves shaped like those of our common cranberry, and bears an acid fruit used
for the same purposes as our cranberry. It is very rare in this State, and where
known, is called the ‘* Cow Berry.”

There is still another plant, (Arbutus, Uva-ursi—L.) found in abundance on Cape
Cod, and there called the «« Hog*Cranberry.’’ This is the Common Bearberry. It
is not properly a variety of the cranberry, but belongs to a different genus. Its
leaves, are in shape, much like those of the cranberry, and it is trailing like that
plant. Its fruit is red, but smaller than the cranberry, and is used for medicinal
purposes.

All these plants have come under my personal observation and study.

4-4 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

Scotia and New Brunswick, and that vicinity, where it bears
very abundantly, and along the St. John’s River, to agreat dis-
tance from its mouth. It is met with in some parts of Massa-
chusetts also. I observed it in the swamps of Provincetown,
where it is called the “ spice cranberry.” It is imported into
England, from Sweden and the north of Europe, in large
quantities, and though with us it would be considered as far
inferior to our common cranberry, it is more esteemed by many.

In Sweden, it was formerly common to boil silver plate in
the acid juice of this berry, that it might eat off the minute
particles of copper alloy.

The common American cranberry is a native of North
America. It grows and flourishes in mossy swamps and bogs,
as well as on sandy soils, from high northern latitudes, to
North Carolina on the south, and to Minnesota on the west,
where it produces very abundantly every other year, and is not
excelled in size or flavor by cranberries in any part of the
country. It is bought in large quantities of the Indians.

The stem of this species is larger than that of the small
cranberry just described, and is commonly from a foot, to four
or five feet in length. It is sometimes much longer than that.
I have seen it from twelve to fifteen feet in length, throwing up
many rising branches, sometimes to the height of eight or ten
inches. The leaves are about one-half an inch long and nearly
one-fourth of an inch broad, the second year, when full grown.
On the new spring branches, which bear the flowers and berries,
they are crowded towards the top. They are of an oblong,
oval shape, the margin curved back, divided in the middle above
and beneath by the costa, from which veins run to the margin.
The flowers are frequently in pairs, very elegant, held towards
the end of the new spring branches by erect, reddish stalks,
much bent near the ends, giving them, together with the calix
and flower-bud, before expanding, the appearance of a crane’s
neck, head and bill, whence it derives its name, craneberry or
cranberry. The flowers continue to grow until immature ber-
ries are produced on the stem in July, and in some instances,
even into August. The berries are of a yellowish green before
ripening, and when ripe, of a bright scarlet or carmine color,
and in some yarieties, nearly black, or light and speckled with

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 45

deep red, varying in shape, from round to oval oblong, about
one-half of an inch in diameter, of an agreeable acid taste, and
often clinging to the vines during the whole winter. If gath-
ered before fully ripe, they have not that delicious acid taste
which they have at their maturity, and are, therefore, far less
valuable than when left to ripen on the vines.

The cranberry grows naturally in watery bogs and morasses,
and sometimes on high mountains. I have seen it growing
luxuriantly and producing in abundance on marshes exposed to,
and covered by high tides, on coarse sand, perfectly white and
entirely destitute of organic matter of any kind, though accessi-
ble to moisture; on pure peat, on peat covered with sand, on
dry, loamy and gravelly upland, and on the richest garden
mould thoroughly tilled.

The’ American cranberry is exported very largely to Europe,
though, as has been stated, it is not universally considered as
equal to the Russian. It was found and used by the early set-
tlers of Massachusetts, though not introduced into the Royal
Botanic Garden, at Kew, till 1772, and comparatively little
valued here, till within the last half century.

Analysis —A valuable analysis of this fruit has recently been
made, at my request, by Professor EH. N. Horsford, of Cam-
bridge. From this analysis it appears that the

Percentage of water expelled at 212° F., is 2) 68.18
Percentage of ash, a a : ay
Woody fibre, tissues, organic acids and other or-

ganic matter not decomposed at 212° F., -. E105

100.00
Percentage of potash in the ash, : : . 42.67
4 oMBOda, « : : . , : by

This explains why this fruit flourishes so well on the sea-shore,
where it derives its alkalies; the amount of potash, though
small, may be derived from the sea.

From this analysis, it will be seen that only .17 per cent., or
less than two-tenths of one per cent. of the cranberry is found
in the ash, as inorganic matter, derived from the soil, all the
rest being derived from the atmosphere and from water. The

46 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

results of experience are, therefore, strikingly corroborated by
the deductions of science, that the cranberry will grow where
nothing else will. It explains, too, how it is that this fruit
seems to require nothing for its perfect development, but air
and water, as will appear more distinctly hereafter.*

Modes of Cultivation—The cranberry may be propagated
from the seed, or from cuttings, or by transplanting. The last
method is most frequently adopted. The first crop obtained
by planting the seed, will ordinarily be a year or two later than

* The following is a detailed statement of the analysis referred to:—

ANALYSIS OF THE ASH OF THE CRANBERRY, ( Ozycoceus Macrocarpus. )

The berries were dried in a steam chamber at 212° F., and from these the ash
determined by slow combustion in a platinum crucible.

The qualitative analysis of the ash indicated the presence of the following sub-
stances : Potassa, soda, lime, magnesia, sesquioxide of iron, sesquioxide of man-
ganese, sulphuric acid, chlorine silicic acid, carbonic acid, phosphoric acid, charcoal
and sand.

The quantitative analysis of the ash gave the following results :—

Determination of the Water.
I. 9.4107 grms. of cranberries gave A . ‘ . 1.0165 grms.
II. 8.2052 « “ “ A 5 . 5 9489 «
PU O.2275) 66 6s . : : 5 1.04382 §

Determination of the Ash.
I. 8.4916 grms. of undried fruit gave . 5 - .0149 grms. of ash.
II. 8.1049 «© ae a ° . - 0133 *§ He
- TI. 9.4107. « as es ° ° 5 hives as
Determination of the Potassa.
0.811 grms. of ash gave 1.7917 grms. of potassio-chloride of platinum.
Determination of the Soda.
.811 grms. of ash gave .5748 grms. of mixed chlorides of potassium and sodium.
of which . : 5477 ‘ was chloride of potassium.

and. . . -0271 ‘ was chloride of sodium.
Determination of the Lime.
1.622 grms. of ash gave .2955 grms. of carbonate of lime.

Determination of the Magnesia.
1.622 grms. of ash gave .3122 grms. of pyrophosphate of magnesia.
Determination of the Sulphurie Acid.
-4971 grms. of ash gave .0521 grms. of sulphate of baryta.
Determination of the Chlorine.
-8008 grms. of ash gave .0423 grms of chloride of silver.
Determination of the Silicie Acid.
4.0549 grms. of ash gave .1950 grms. of silicic acid.

SECRETARY’S REPORT. AT

that produced by wild plants transplanted. It is, therefore,
found to be more profitable to transplant, except in one or two
sections of the State, where the interest in transplanting has
been so great, that ten dollars a square rod is not an uncom-
mon price for plants, where ‘the ground is thickly covered.
When it is desired to propagate by slips or cuttings, the usual
practice is to gather a large quantity of vines and run them
through a common hay-cutter, till they are reduced to the
length desired, an inch or so, when they may be sown broad-

Determination the Carbonic Acid.
-4930 grms. of ash gave .0656 grms. of carbonic acid.
Determination of the Phosphoric Acid.
I. .4791 grms. of ash gave .0590 grms. of phosphoric acid.
ee OLssi 6 “ 66 1257 ‘“c “ ‘“c

The foregoing determinations give the following results in one hundred parts :—

I. Il. Ill. Mean.
Water, . . 5 ° ° 89.19 88.43 88.69 88.78
Ash, C ° a - “ al7/ 16 18 otl7/
Woody Fibre, Organic Acids, &c., 11.05 - = 11.05

Composition of the Ash in 100 parts. ,

1 II, Iil. Mean.
Potassa, . 4 4 5 “ 42.67 - - 42.67
Soda, |. = - 5 C 1.77 ~ - 1.77
ores’ a) ae B20 3 = 10.20
Magnesia, : : ° 6.92 - ~ 6.92
Sulphuric Acid, . é ; 3.60 - - 3.60
Chlorine, % - 5 5 1.31 ~ - 1.31
Silicie Acid, . 4 > 4.81 - ~ 4.81
Carbonic Acid, 5 5 TEST - - 13.31
Phosphoric Acid, . ° . 11.87 12.05 - 11.96
Charcoal and Sand,. - C 1.15 - - 1.15

Deducting the charcoal, sand and carbonic acid, the ash was found to be com-
posed of

Potassa, C . ; S : é é ‘: . ; ; 50.7956

Soda, ° é 5 ‘ R 5 5 : F ‘ ‘ -7507
Chloride of Sodium, . c A ; ‘ : : : ; 2.5619
Lime, : . . ° ° ° . . ° A . 12.1443
Magnesia, . ; 4 5 ; : ; E : 3 6 8.2370
Sesquioxide of Iron, . c : . : 4 . 5 ‘ 1.2433
Sesquioxide of Manganese, . : : ° : : . : trace.

Sulphuric Acid, . : c . - : . . . . 4.2845
Silicie Acid, : ‘ 4 : ; : ‘ A : ; 5.7257
Phosphoric Acid, 5 : - - - - : : 14.2354

——_ —_——_

100.0000

£5 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

cast and harrowed in, though it is considered best, on some
accounts, to sow in drills and cover properly. These slips very
soon take root, starting from the base of the leaves, and at the
same time shooting up many rising branches. If sown broad-
cast and harrowed, they should not be overflowed till the slips
have taken root, as otherwise, many, remaining uncovered, will
be floated off.

In the case of cranberries growing wild, it is a common and
well-known practice to flow or cover them with water during
the winter and early spring. 'This is very desirable, if the
situation is such as to allow it, though it is not generally con-
sidered as essential by those who have been most successful.
It is often useful, where there are facilities for flowing, to let
the water remain a few inches deep till the spring is well ad-
vanced, (some think, till the first of May, or even later,) to
retard the blossoming till there is no danger from frosts.
Facilities for flowing are desirable in the cultivation of cran-
berries, also, and if the plantation could be so arranged as to
flow very quickly, it might be of essential service, occasionally,
during the spring or autumn.

As the cranberry, in its natural state, is more frequently
found growing in a low wet swamp or marsh, that kind of land
is generally selected for its cultivation.

The mode of setting out the cranberry in such a swamp, if
we suppose it to be covered with bushes and grass, and sur-
rounded by a sandy soil, or in the immediate neighborhood of |
sand, would be as follows: First, cut the bushes and pare off
the surface turf to the depth of several inches, so as to remove,
as far as possible, the roots of grasses and bushes; then
level the whole by filling in sand to the depth of from two to
four or five inches, according to circumstances. It is desirable
that the surface of the sand should be but slightly raised above
the level of the water of the swamp, meadow, or pond filled up,
so that, by digging into the sand with the hand or the hoe, the
water may be found within two or three inches of the surface.
The plants should be taken up with the spade in square turfs,
of the thickness of two or three inches, this being the depth
to which the roots generally descend. When the ground has

been levelled and prepared as directed above, it will be found
,

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 49

more convenient to draw straight lines and set the roots about
eighteen inches apart one way, and one foot the other, in small
elusters of about five or six together, the grasses taken up
with them in the turf having first been removed from them.
The practice of some has been to set the turf, thus taken up,
into the row without removing the grass; but the vines are so
tenacious of life that there is little danger of their dying, even
if all their natural earth is removed from the roots; and those
who have followed this method have generally had much less
trouble in the subsequent cultivation. Some prefer to set
them in rows at a greater distance apart, having the rows two
and a half or three feet, and the plants one foot, in the rows.
The distance may be regulated, somewhat, by circumstances.
If the sand is thick and loose so as to make it impracticable to
cultivate the vines and pull up the grasses and weeds, on
account of the danger of starting the roots, the closer the
plants are set, the better, since they will thus the sooner cover
the ground and get the advantage of the grasses. Where it is
not intended to hoe the plants in such situations, a foot each
way will probably be the most convenient distance between
the plants. .

Many fields which I have seen, are thus arranged. Swamps
like those described, which have always been considered as
entirely incapable of improvement, have been reclaimed in
many instances, with great labor, and filled up with coarse,
white beach sand, and often, where the swamp has been covered
with water, to the depth of three or four feet. The plants
have then been set out in the manner described, from one foot
to eighteen inches apart, in holes made in the sand by a small
stick, hoe or dibble, and sometimes with the hand; a small
cluster of roots taken from the sod in which they had been
taken from their natural position, freed from grass and roots,
being placed in each hole. In such a situation there will
always be moisture enough for them.

The cost in these cases varies from $100 to $400 per acre.
Under the most favorable circumstances, I have never known
an acre prepared in this way, to fall below $125; and that, too,
even where it has been prepared in the most economical way, all
the labor being performed by the owner himself. The cost, in

T

50 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

the situations described, including the original preparation by
paring, fencing, filling up with sand, procuring and setting out
the roots, has more frequently been about $300 per acre. In
many cases within my knowledge, the owner has contracted to
pay at the rate of $1 874 a square rod for preparing the
land and setting out the plants properly. In somewhat more
favorable situations, the contractor pays $1 50a rod, or at the
rate of $240 per acre.

When the roots are thus transplanted, a foot or a foot anda
half being left between them, they are expected to spread and
entirely cover the ground with vines, in about three years.
If the plantation is troubled by grasses at first, the rapid
growth of the plants will generally destroy them in the course
of three or four years. In one of the most successful cases
which have come under my observation, where the plants have
been set about six years, the quantity of grass and weeds was
much less the last season than the preceding; the vines pro-
duced abundantly, and there seems to be every reason to sup-
pose that the cranberries will very soon take full possession of
the ground. But if they are set sufficiently near, and have a
proper amount of labor bestowed upon them, they will ordi-
narily, on sand, get an early hold of the ground and bid defi-
ance to all opposition.

In some swamps and peat meadows, generally denominated
“ shaky,” the surface is composed of a matting of roots, mosses,
and various undecomposed organic matter; the whole of which
seems to rest on a liquid, or almost liquid, bed beneath. This
top matting may be thick and strong enough to prevent a per-
son walking over it, from falling through. In such cases, the
surface cannot very well be taken off, and the sand must be put
upon the top; but careful consideration should be given to
the quantity used, as, if too much be put on, its weight may
sink the whole surface into the water beneath. Two or three
inches will commonly be found as much as it is prudent to use.
I have seen several examples where a neglect of reasonable
precaution, in regard to this matter, has cost the owner the
loss of all his labor and expenditure.

The mode of treatment which has been described, will be
found to be the best for swamps surrounded by large quantities

SECRETARY’S REPORT, 51

of sand; and experiments, extending over a term of seven or
eight years, with plants every year becoming more and more
productive, show conclusively, that cranberries will flourish in
pure white sand, if they are supplied with sufficient moisture.

If the position be a peat meadow, substantially the same
course should be pursued. If very moist, it would, perhaps,
be well to arrange suitable drains; and if these drains could
be so constructed as to make it possible to flow the plantation
in a very short time, it would, at times, be highly beneficial in
preventing frost. The surface should be pared, the turfs being
sometimes taken off and piled up for the compost, and some-
times turned directly over and left on the ground. As to the
next step, in such cases, there is great difference of opinion,
some preferring to cover the whole with sand—or gravel, if
sand cannot be had—and others, to put the vines directly upon
the peat bottom. The black soil, it is thought, is very useful
in securing sufficient warmth in spring and autumn, as a pro-
tection against frost. This point has not been fully settled by
experiment, so that it is impossible to say positively, that the one
course or the other is the better. So far, however, all things
being taken into consideration, the weight of opinion seems to
be in favor of the former course,—covering to the depth of
three or four inches with sand, or, where sand cannot be ob-
tained, with gravel. This method very much diminishes the
labor of hoeing, if it be found necessary, where the roots
of grasses or bushes are left in the peat. Most cultivators
prefer to hoe a little, sometimes twice or three times the first
and second years after transplanting, or till the vines have
trailed so as to make it inexpedient. The objection to trans-
planting in pure peat bog without sand, does not arise from
the nature of the soil itself, which is, perhaps, as favorable, or
nearly so, to the cranberry, as sand; but rather from the cause
alluded to—the difficulty of hoeing, if the plants require it,
when set in peat. The cranberry seems to have a wonderful
power of adapting itself to any kind of soil; it draws its
nourishment mostly from the atmosphere, though a liberal sup-
ply of moisture is desirable.

A somewhat simpler mode of procedure is sometimes adopt-
ed in the case of ordinary low meadows or swamps in the

52 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

country. If the meadow is covered with bushes and _has-
socks, the former are cut and the roots taken up with the grub-
ber, and the latter are cut off level with the surface, when the
vines being taken up from another part of the meadow or else-
where, are set by first striking a hoe into the soil and raising
it slightly, when the roots are inserted and pressed down with
the foot. In this way, a large space may be quickly set with
vines, which, under favorable circumstances, may cover the
ground in three or four years. This method, it is evident, re-
quires but little skill.

I have never seen more than one or two plantations with the
roots set in the mud alone. In these cases, the soil had settled
around them, leaving the plants standing on the ends of the
roots, nearly out of the ground. So far as can be judged from
appearances, they were by no means likely to grow; while
close at hand was a piece covered with sand, on which the
vines were very thrifty, with not a sign of failure. The mix-
ture of sand had given the surface more consistency, and the
plants had become well rooted and strong.

The experiments which have already been made, clearly
show the practicability of raising cranberries on upland. I
have seen flourishing plantations of them on all varieties of
soils, from a high and light gravelly loam, to a very deep, rich,
garden soil. Indeed, the universal opinion seems to be, that
such cranberries are better than those growing naturally in
wet meadows. In the instances which I have myself seen, the
Jand had been carefully ploughed and prepared, as it usually is
for strawberries, or plants of that description. The plants
were taken from their original situation in the manner de-
scribed, in the sod, and freed from grasses and roots; they
were then put into shallow trenches or drills dug for the pur-
pose, about two and a half or three feet apart. In conse-
quence of the large space left between the drills, constant and
careful attention was necessary for two or three years, so that
far more labor was spent on them than the same area of straw-
berries would have required.

In one case, the plantation was situated on a high and dry
hill, in a light loamy soil, and no water was supplied except
what they had from occasional rains. The vines nearly all

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 53

lived; but as the plantation was only three years old, and the
rows too far apart, they had not wholly covered the ground,
nor had they borne to any extent.

In the cultivation of cranberries, whether on upland or low-
land,it is very important that the ground should be entirely cov-
ered by the vines as soon after planting as possible, not only on
account of the great saving in labor, by thus preventing the
growth of grass and weeds, but also, because very little fruit
is commonly produced till the vines have thus spread over the
surface. At the end of three years the whole ground should
be covered; but in the instances of upland culture referred to,
it was not so, though the plantation had been set at least three
or four years. Probably, if the roots had been put but twelve
or eighteen inches apart each way, the result of the experi-
ments would have been more satisfactory in this respect. As
it was, however, the yield in 1852, was one bushel to the square
rod, when cranberries were selling readily at four dollars per
bushel.

But, in estimating the comparative profits of the upland and
lowland cultivation, it will be borne in mind that the labor on
upland is greater, and the land more valuable for other pur-
poses. The liability to frosts, is not, however, quite so great
when the cranberries are in blossom. There can be no doubt
that it will grow and do well on upland, and produce too, a
superior fruit; but it seems to prefer a poor, sandy soil, full
of moisture, such as can be best obtained by improving swamps,
which, unless used for this purpose, are nearly worthless.
Half an acre of cranberries, on a very rich upland soil has
been estimated by the owner to have cost him, after being set four
years, and including labor, interest of land, and other expenses of
cultivation, about $300, or at the rate of nearly $600 to the
acre; whereas, it has been seen that the roughest and most
unpromising swamps may be reclaimed and set with cranberries
at about half that amount. If the soil be a rich loam, as in
the case above mentioned, the grass and weeds struggle very
hard for the mastery, while on the poor and barren sand they
hardly grow at all if the ground has been properly prepared
in the first instance; so that the labor of cultivation is but
very little, at most, and many think that no care at all is

54 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

needed. Thus, there seems to be much truth in the remark
which I have often heard on this subject: “Give us sand and
water enough, and we can grow cranberries to any extent.”
So far as my own observation extends, the fruit grown on pure
white sand, is quite equal in point of size and firmness to that
grown on upland. More experiments, may, however, show fur-
ther advantages in its extended culture on upland.

It should be remarked that it will be well to spend sufficient
time in planting the vines, to do it properly, since they will
‘thus get an earlier start, and sooner cover the ground. In the
case of one plantation, visited during the process of trans-
planting, after the sand had been filled in and levelled, a line
was carefully drawn and marks were made in the sand, eighteen
inches one way, and one foot the other, when holes were dug
three inches deep by one man with the hoe, while another fol-
lowed, dropping five or six roots into each hole, and after him
followed a boy who pressed the sand carefully about them. In
this way, an acre was quickly planted.

No manure is needed for the cranberry. Indeed, from what
has been said, it will be evident that the poorer the ground
the better. In the experiments which have come under my
observation, where manure was used, it caused the coarse grass-
es to grow abundantly, to the injury of the cranberry plants,
which were not apparently benefited by the manure. But in
cases of upland culture, swamp muck is often Beet about the
vines, and with apparent profit.

In the case of vines growing naturally, it will be found ad-
vantageous to spread over them occasionally, a thin covering
of sand.

Time of Planting —If the cranberry is to be raised from
seed, it may be sown in the fall or in the spring. For some
reasons the latter is preferred, and the month of May is select-
ed. It is better to crush the fruit and separate the seed from
the pulp, though the latter is not necessary. The berry is
sometimes crushed and mixed with sand, by which means the
sowing is made more easy.

If the plants are to be propagated by cuttings, the spring is
considered as preferable. The ground should be moist, but
not liable to be flowed immediately after planting.

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 55

But for the usual mode of transplanting the vines, the fall is
generally preferred, though there seems to be no difficulty in
making them live when transplanted at any season of the year.
I have known them transplanted in the middle of summer, and
to live and do well. But if the planting be done in the fall,
they take root in the spring and grow more vigorously the first
‘ year, than they otherwise would. For this reason, if the
ground can be made ready in the fall, it is desirable to have
the vines set out then, and they will thus ordinarily have the
start of those planted the following spring, by two or three
months. If planted in the autumn, they will also bear a little
the next summer, and the crop will increase gradually till the
fourth or fifth year, when it seems to attain its highest yield.
Circumstances may make some difference in the length of time
which must pass before a full crop is obtained, as, if the vines
are much choked up by grass, and retarded in their growth by
want of care. The statement made above, both as to the time
ordinarily required, and as to the effect of the unfavorable
circumstances alluded to, is confirmed by the experience of
many who have been engaged in the cultivation of cranberries
long enough to have had opportunities of extended observa-
tion on the subject. There seems to be no reason why the
crop should diminish after the fifth year, nor is it certain that
it will, as a general rule; yet it is evident that if, at this age,
the thrifty and healthy vines have covered the whole ground,
they will be likely to bear to their utmost capacity. Probably,
after the seventh or eighth year, it will be found to be well to
rake or stir the surface under the vines so far as it can be done,
or perhaps, to spread over them’ a thin covering of sand or
loam.

The Yield.—The yield will vary according to circumstances,
but about one hundred and fifty bushels per acre will be a fair
average; though an acre in full bearing will often produce
more than two hundred bushels. In a very large number of
cases, a bushel to the square rod has been gathered without
much trouble of cultivation. In one lot visited by me, more
than three bushels to a rod, or at the rate of four hundred
and eighty bushels to the acre, on two or three rods, were
obtained from very thrifty vines on a peat bottom, with a thin

56 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

covering of sand. This must be regarded as a remarkable
yield; and when the quality of the fruit is such as to command
a ready sale at from nine to eleven dollars a barrel, which was
offered for them the past season, this crop must be acknowl-
edged to be very profitable.

Loudon remarks, that Sir Joseph Banks, after having import-
ed the American Cranberry into England, raised, in 1831, three
and a half bushels on a piece of land eighteen feet square.
This is at the rate of about four hundred and sixty bushels to
the acre.

It is probable, that for several years in succession, the aver-
age yield throughout the State would not be more than a hun-
dred bushels per acre, if it were so great; being some years
much more than that, and others much less, the number of bush-
els varying according to the accidents of frosts and winter.

The market value of this fruit will also be different in differ-
ent seasons. In 1852, four dollars a bushel, for cultivated
cranberries, were very readily obtained. During the past sea-
son, the price has ranged from two to four dollars a bushel,
according to the quality; raising and falling, also, to some ex-
tent, according to the demand and the supply in the market.

The demand is rapidly increasing, and there can be little
doubt that it will continue to increase as the superior quality
of the cranberry, in some sections of this State, becomes better
known. And if, owing to any circumstances, as competition from
abroad, the value should fall to one dollar per bushel, it would
still be a profitable and desirable product, especially when itis
left to occupy its favorite barren and otherwise unproductive
swamps and dead sands. There are few crops which, with the
same amount of labor, will make so good a return.

Varieties—There are but two species of the cranberry, prop-
erly so called, which are of much practical value, as has been
already intimated in speaking of the natural history of this plant ;
yet of each species there may be several varieties, more or less
permanent, according to the circumstances and manner in which
they were produced, just as there are varieties of the apple
produced by the accidents of cultivation, and which are not
permanent; as, for example, if we plant the seeds of any im-
proved and cultivated variety, like the Baldwin, we cannot

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 5T

depend upon having, from the seedling, the same variety as that
from which the seeds were taken.

The varieties of the cranberry have not been distinctly
named, as most varieties of the apple have, and must be de-
scribed, and can only be distinguished, by difference in shape
and color. It is very important that the most approved varie-
ties should be selected for cultivation, as they command a much
higher price in the market. The large, round and black cran-
berry of Cape Cod and Cape Ann, sells for nearly a third more
than the oblong and softer variety, more common in other parts
of the State. It might properly be called the Black cranber-
ry, so nearly does its beautifully shaded, deep red, approach to
black. It is very hard, nearly as hard as a Baldwin apple, and
will bear transportation to any distance. It keeps well through
the winter, and even, in some cases, into the succeeding sum-
mer. Indeed, with a little care, good cranberries may be kept
a much longer time, either dry in bottles, corked so as to ex-
clude the air, or in bottles filled with pure spring water.

It is probable that the superior qualities of this variety
arise, in a great measure, from peculiarities of soil and situa-
tion, and from the fact that it can remain on the vines till it is
fully ripe, without danger from frost. The proximity of the
sea, also, may have much to do with this superiority. From
extended inquiries into the quality of the same variety, in dif-
ferent localities, | have been led to the conclusion that the sea
air is, for reasons alluded to above, highly conducive to its
perfect development.

There is an oblong cranberry, more common in the low, wet
bogs of the country, softer than that which has been described,
of a loose and rather watery texture, and shrinking much more
in cooking. It is sometimes shaped like an oblong pear. Its
color is a beautiful vermilion. It seems to be much more sen-
sitive, and liable to injury by the frost, than the variety just
described. These varieties are not constant, nor are they very
perfectly marked, each occasionally having the characteristics
of the other. Thus the black cranberry. sometimes, though
rarely, assumes an oblong or pear shape, and the oblong is
sometimes found harder and better than it generally is, and of
a deeper red. The fruit, indeed, assumes every conceivable

8

58 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

shade and shape, from the black globular, to the light and
oblong or pear-shaped.

Since these varieties are not permanent, it follows that there
is no certainty that the seed will produce a plant which will be
similar to that from which the seed was taken. We cannot
depend upon having a Baldwin apple from the seed of the
Baldwin. The product may, indeed, be superior to its parent,
or it may be inferior, but it will seldom be precisely similar to
it. The seed of the black cranberry might produce the black,
as it sometimes does. The same circumstances which gave
such peculiar characteristics to the fruit from which the seed
was taken, would probably give it the same. It is always safe
and wise to select the best seed of the best fruit, of every
description, to plant.

The question has often been asked, whether the two varie-
ties, when brought together, would injure each other, or in
other words, whether, if the black and the common oblong
cranberry of the country, were transplanted into the same
piece, and placed in the immediate vicinity of each other, the
fruit of each would have all its original distinctive character-
istics? If both varieties of vines ran together, as they natu-
rally would, so that the dust or pollen of one would fall on
and fructify the other, it is very probable that the fruit would
have some of the characteristics of each variety. The inferior
cranberry would, perhaps, be improved, and it is possible that
the fruit so produced might be better than either alone would
have been. Such is, to a great extent, the case with all acci-
dental varieties of fruit; as when a variety of Indian corn, for
example, is so situated that its pollen falls upon other varieties
of the same grain, the effects are invariably seen in the differ-
ent character given to the fruit of that on which it falls.

But, if our common American cranberry were intermixed
with the small, or European cranberry, in the manner above
described, the same amalgamation probably would not take
place, from the fact that the species is different. There might
possibly be an intermixture, but it would be very unlikely to
occur.

The Cranberry Worm.—There is an insect which attacks
the cranberry. Its history and habits are not yet fully known,

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 59

though the subject is now studied so closely that they will
probably soon be determined. The egg is supposed to be
deposited in the blossom. From this egg proceeds a small
caterpillar, which works its way through the fruit, eating the
pulp and causing the green fruit to turn red prematurely and
decay. It bears a striking resemblance to the apple-worm,
and seems to be very much like it inits habits. This similarity
has been observed by Dr. T. W. Harris, as appears by a letter
from which the following extract is taken :—

“ Within the past two or three years, some complaint has
been made of injury done to cranberries by insects. A sample
of the injured fruit was put into my hands by the editor of one
of our agricultural newspapers. The insects found therein were
small, naked caterpillars, strikingly like those called apple-
worms, or core-worms. Their habits seemed to be identical
with those of these common depredators. Each of the affect-
ed cranberries had been tenanted by a single worm, which
had entered, when very small, and had devoured more or
less of the pulp, filling its path with its blackish excre-
ments. Not having traced this insect to its final state, I can-
not positively assert that it is the same species as that which
affects the apple; but if not the same, it is probably congener-
ical or closely allied thereto. Jam not acquainted with any
other insect attacking the cranberry.”

Others have observed a striking resemblance of the appear-
ance and sensitive nature of this insect to the Palmer worm.

Two different remedies have been adopted for this evil.
One is to flow the cranberry ground one whole year, thus
losing the crop of one season, and the other is to sow ‘salt upon
the cranberry bed, at the rate of about five or six bushels to the
acre. On plantations which cannot be flowed, the latter will
probably be found to be the only effectual remedy. If what
has been observed be true, that cranberries growing on or near
a salt marsh are superior to any others, it is also natural to
suppose this application of salt would be beneficial to the cran-
berries, even if it did not destroy, or prevent the ravages of
this insect.

Mode of Gathering.—In this country, the cranberry is
generally gathered with a rake made for the purpose, with

60 BOARD Of AGRICULTURE.

which twenty or thirty bushels a day can be taken from the
vines. But on newly planted beds, or loose sand, there may
be danger that this method will injure the roots, and it will not
be found expedient, in such cases, to use the rake till the
plants are very firmly rooted, and have covered the ground.
But raking, in the majority of cases, so far from injuring the
vines, is probably a benefit to them, when no other cultivation is
practicable. In Germany, the small cranberry is gathered by
means of wooden combs. In England and Scotland, where they
are not found in so great abundance, they are generally picked
by hand.

If I have dwelt longer on this subject than its compar-
ative importance would seem to justify, it need only be stated
that the cultivation of cranberries is fast becoming an im-
portant branch of our agriculture, more than one hundred
thousand bushels of this valuable fruit having been gathered
during the past season, from land which, for all other purposes,
would have been comparatively worthless, while the demand for
it here and in England is sufficiently large to absorb all that can
be thrown into the market ;—that the information on this sub-
ject was much scattered and inaccessible to many, and that
great facilities were at my command for extensive and accurate
observation of experiments, many of which had been tried so
long that I could state conclusions resting on them, with some
degree of confidence.

But, as I have before intimated, some questions relating to
the culture of this plant, are still to be settled by experiment,
and it is possible that time and future observation may require
some modification of the opinions which have been advanced
above.

BROOMCORN.

There are still other products which are cultivated only in
particular localities. These, however, should not be over-
looked in an account of the agriculture of the State.

Among these, broomcorn is largely cultivated in the Valley of
the Connecticut. This crop is increasing rapidly, as it is found
to do well, and to be very profitable. The returns of 1840 show
that only 580 tons were raised in the State, while in 1850, the

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 61

amount had increased to 1,291 tons. From much observation
and inquiry, in the course of the last year, I am inclined to
think that a much greater quantity isnow produced. Probably
it would average one-fourth more, making the present product
of this crop over 1,600 tons.

The preparation of the ground for broomcorn is very much
the same as for Indian corn. A carefully written statement
furnished by a committee of a Farmers’ Club, says :—< Upon
the one hundred and cighty acres of broomcorn are grown
fifty bushels of broomcorn seed, to the acre, which will weigh
from thirty-five to forty pounds to the bushel, and worth one
cent a pound. Upon this seed, mixed with corn, swine are
fattened.”

This estimate is based on the crop of the past season. The
average yield, per acre, is from 500 to 550 pounds. In some
towns it is greater, varying according to the difference of soil
and culture.

TOBACCO.

Nor would any notice of the products of this State be com-
plete without an allusion to tobacco. The cultivation of this
plant was recently revived in the Valley of the Connecticut.
It has now become an important product in that vicinity. In
one town alone, more than seventy-five acres were appropriated
to it the past season. I have visited many very large fields
during the last summer, to examine and compare the different
modes of culture.

The following statement of the method of cultivation, kindly
furnished me by one whose long experience and eminent suc-
cess makes him perfectly competent to state the whole process,
will give a better idea of it than any general remarks of mine.
He says :-—

“My mode is first to select a moist—not wet—piece of rich
ground, and as early as spring will permit, prepare it as a bed
in the garden. Sow the seed broadcast, at the rate of one
tablespoonful to the rod. Then tread, or roll it hard, without
any other covering. It is well to mix the seed with plaster or
corn meal, that you can see that it is sown even.

“The plants should be kept free from weeds till large enough

62 BOARD-OF AGRICULTURE.

to transplant. They should be left on the bed till they have a
good leaf and begin to form a tap root. The ground for re-
ceiving them should be made rich and well pulverized, then set
the rows three féet four inches apart, and at two and a half
feet in the rows. Occasionaily put two plants in a hill, that
one may be taken out with the hoe at hocing time, to fill vacan-
cies. Should many occur, it is necessary to go over the field
and reset from the plant bed. We go through the rows
twice with the cultivator, and three or four times with the
hoe, as the crop or weeds may require. The crop is left to
grow till as much as possible will blossom without forming
seed, then break every plant that will do, down to a good sized
leaf. By this process the crop will ripen nearly all at one
time. If you have late plants in the field, top them low and
they will ripen with the early ones. All suckers must be re-
moved from the time of topping till you cut it, which is usually
about three weeks after it is topped. Cut with a hatchet, and
let it lie on the ground till wilted sufficiently to handle without
breaking the leaves. If in hot, fair weather, avoid letting it
lie in the sun in the middle of the day, as sunburn injures it as
much as a frost. Ichoose to cut about two o’clock, P. M., and
near sundown lay it in hakes, about three or four plants in each,
then hang it up the next morning. J hang on poles or rails,
twelve feet long, with twine, from thirteen to fourteen plants on
each side, making thirty-six or thirty-eight plants on each pole,
and place the poles at least eighteen inches apart. Many hang
it too thick, which causes it to sweat. This is a great Injury.

“Tn the early part of the process of curing, give it all
the air you can, taking care to close the building in the
rain. When sufficiently cured, it is taken down in a damp
or rainy time, and stripped, and sorted into two sorts—fillers
and wrappers—and tied in hands from half to three-fourths of
a pound each, and packed carefully down, tip to tip, till it is
ready to case. It is then pressed in boxes of about four hun-
dred pounds each. Much of the Connecticut seed-leaf—for it
is known by that name—is shipped out of the country. Its
great excellence is for cigars, and has, for the last few years,
been sold from eight to sixteen cents per pound. A good aver-
age crop is sixteen hundred pounds per acre. I think I have

SECRETARY'S REPORT. 63

in no season of late, raised less than two thousand pounds per
acre, and have sold all, both first and second quality, at my
door, for fourteen cents per pound, the last two years. As to
the cost of raising, I estimate one acre of tobacco to three of
corn, which would yield fifty bushels per acre.”

Another communication from Franklin County, will throw
additional light upon this subject. The writer says :—

“In the first place, great care should be taken in getting
plants large enough to set out as early as may be. If possi-
ble, I would commence setting as soon as the 8th of June, and
finish as soon as the 12th or 15th; and in order to get plants
large enough for setting, as early as that, a good warm spot of
ground should be selected, and the north and west sides should
be protected by a light fence or buildings. The manure applied
in the fall of the year, and ploughed five or six inches deep;
sow the seed as early as the season will admit, say from the
1st to the 10th of April, and at the same time top-dress with
Super-phosphate of Lime, say four or five pounds to the rod;
or I think that it would be advisable to apply the Super-phos-
phate of Lime previous to sowing the seed, and rake it in, as
it will not answer to rake the bed after sowing the seed. I
have known plants set as late as the 4th of July, and later, to
mature; but my own experience and observation are decidedly
in favor of early setting, as it is necessary that the crop should
be all hung up as-soon as the 10th of September, for fear of
frost; and it needs the time then to cure before we have cold,
freezing weather. It is necessary that every stem should be
cured before the leaves are stripped off from the stalk, as in
case of there being fat stems in the hands of tobacco, if
they do not rot, they are sure to discolor it, and produce heat
in the packs, before boxing.

“Last year, a large quantity of tobacco, which was sold to
the speculators for large prices, ranging from twelve and a half
to seventeen cents per pound, was by them rejected, on the
ground that it was not properly cured before stripping.”

In the town from which this statement comes, the average
yield, per acre, is estimated at 1,550 pounds.

All the information that can be gathered, leads to the belief
that the quantity annually raised in the State cannot be less

64 BOARD. OF AGRICULTURE.

than one hundred and sixty tons, occupying about two hundred
and twenty acres of land. It is thought by many to be a very
exhausting crop. From what has been said, it will be seen
that it requires very thorough and careful cultivation, and the
free use of manure.

Fuax.

There is another crop to which certain sections of this State
are peculiarly adapted, both on account of their soil and their
nearness to markets, where there is a constant and increasing
demand for it. Irefer to Flax. There wasa time when it was
cultivated in most parts of the Commonwealth in small quanti-
ties; but an impression grew up that it was an exhausting crop
and very injurious to the land, and its culture was generally
abandoned. It is now found only in a few localities, and that
to so limited an extent as hardly to deserve mention as one of
the present products of the State.

The demand for flax fibre in this country will undoubtedly
lead to the study of the plant and its more extended culture,
and experiments will probably prove it to be profitable in many
situations. The farmers of the West find it for their interest
to raise it for the seed alone. The amount of seed raised in
the United States in 1850, was reported by the census to be
562,312 bushels. In 1852 there were about 250,000 acres in
flax, producing on an average from eight to ten bushels of seed.
The yield of seed must have been about 2,250,000 bushels. By
- far the largest portion of this is raised in the Western States,

and though the fibre is worth nearly the price of hay, it is left
in large quantities to rot on the ground on account of the ex-
pense of transportation, and because the old processes of pre-
paring the straw made it necessary to take it from the field
before the seed was fully ripe. New and improved methods of
preparation have been lately introduced however, by which the
process of preparing the fibre is very much shortened and sim-
plified. By the present modes of preparation, the fibre of the
mature flax may be taken and used, so that the cultivator can
make his profit both on the seed and the straw. The introduc-
tion of new machinery into this State for the manufacture of
flax, will give our farmers a great advantage over the western

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 65

producer, by bringing a market for his crop up to his very
door.

The government of Great Britain has long encouraged the
growth of flax, and is now paying an annual bounty of about
$5,000 for the encouragement of the growth of this article. But
that country cannot produce enough to supply the demand of
her own people. In 1851 she imported about 124,784 tons of
dressed fibre. She also imports flax seed and linseed cake
very largely. Only about one-fourth part of the quantity of
these products now used by her is produced in the kingdom.
These facts are stated to show the great foreign demand for
this article of produce, and must convince the candid inquirer
that every grower will find a ready market for all he can raise.

Several establishments in this State are already engaged in
the manufacture of linen goods of various kinds, at Andover.
Willimantic, Clinton, Webster, Fall River and other places.
Operations will soon be commenced in the vicinity of Springfield
also. These manufactories will, of course, increase the de-
mand for the raw material which they use.

Flax does not require a very peculiar soil, nor is it an ex-
hausting crop. An alluvial soil, or what is commonly called a
light sandy loam, is thought to be best adapted to it. The
plant draws most of its nourishment from the air and from
water. It is only the seed that draws upon soil to any great
extent. The constituents, moreover, which the seed takes from
the earth are easily returned to it by feeding out the oil-cake
to cattle, and dressing the land with the stable manure.

In the cultivation of this plant more danger is apprehended
from too great richness of soil than from its being too poor and
light. If the soil is very rich, the fibre is frequently too coarse,
and of an inferior quality. The custom which has prevailed in
this country of allotting to it the richest parts of the farm may
have given rise to the objection sometimes made to American
flax, in England, that the fibre is too coarse for the best quality
of linen fabrics.

In view of the many facts in regard to the cultivation of this
plant which have recently been brought to our notice, I cannot
but think that it would be well to try it on many lands which
could be prepared for this crop at less expense than for others.

9

66 BOARD-OF AGRICULTURE.

Among its other recommendations, may be mentioned the
peculiar fattening properties of the seed, which have never been
fully appreciated in this country.

But two tons of this product were returned as raised in 1840.
In 1850 there were sixty-nine tons. The next valuation will
probably increase this amount, and it is to be hoped that it will
hereafter become a prominent article of produce among us.

Hops.

The cultivation of hops may be alluded to in this connection,
though it is more confined than some other crops, to particular
localities.- The yield in 1840, was about 237,941 lbs. In 1850,
there were only about 150,655 Ibs.

RECLAIMED LANDS.

I have before referred to the progress made in reclaiming
waste lands, and may now remark generally that, for some
time past much attention seems to have been paid to it. In
1840, there were 955,283 acres of unimproved land, and
360,278 thought to be incapable of improvement; the whole
number of acres returned being 4,491,812 acres.

In 1850, the returns gave 715,294 acres unimproved, and
257,929 incapable of improvement. These facts show a most
gratifying advance in this important branch of agriculture,
Waste lands have been brought under cultivation at the rate of
24,000 acres annually, and that formerly considered as hope-
lessly barren has been reclaimed at the rate of 10,000 acres
annually.

The land in tillage in 1840 was returned as 259,038 acres.
In 1850, it had increased to 300,269 acres, while the upland
mowing had increased from 440,930 to 528,025 acres, and the
pasture lands from 1,210,154 to 1,311,210. This makes the in-
crease in tillage land 41,2303 acres; in upland mowing, 87,095 ;
and in pasturage, 101,056 ; making in all 229.3813 acres. This
shows how a very large part of the 239,9894 acres reclaimed
in the ten years has been appropriated; the pasture land has
been turned into mowing and tillage, and the unimproved land
into pasturage or tillage.

The draining of lands, also, is receiving increased attention;

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 67

and this by means wet meadows, which were comparatively
worthless, have become as valuable as any other part of the
farm, and are more profitable than the older and more ex-
hausted uplands. This gain has not been confined to one sec-
tion of the State. It has been very general, though of compar-
atively recent date. In some few places, indeed, as early as
a century ago, waste lands had been greatly improved, but very
little interest was felt in the subject in the State at large, until
within a few years. This would naturally be the case in a
country not lone settled. When lands are cheap and easily
procured, those which require the least expenditure of labor are
taken and used first. There is no occasion for high culture,
such as we should expect to find in an old and populous
country. When one field is exhausted, others are near at hand
and may be had for the asking. As the progress of civilization
and the wants of the people require it, attention is turned to mak-
ing and reclaiming land. The seaand the marsh are filled up to
meet the necessities of the city; the lake and the swamp to
supply the wants of the country; and as new land is made, the
old will be more highly cultivated. This reflection will force
itself upon the observing traveller at every turn between Berk-
shire and Barnstable. To show the state of feeling existing to
some extent in different sections, a few brief extracts may be
given.

An intelligent writer in the southern part of Berkshire
says:—“‘The drainage of and reclaiming waste and swamp
lands, has engaged the attention of our farmers to a large ex-
tent. The amount of land so reclaimed within the time you
named, has been from 400 to 500 acres, and the most of this
has been reclaimed within a few years. The profit arising from
it will, on an average, be about 50 per cent. ; in some cases it is
very large, and lands so reclaimed are now the best parts of our
farms. Our Agricultural Society has taken the matter in hand,
and is now offering handsome premiums to the reclaimers.
The number of competitors this year was quite large, showing
that the importance of it is beginning to be felt.”

In Hampshire County, one writer says:—“I will give you
the process of reclaiming our poor, worthless swamp lands.
In the first place, we drain them as dry as we can conveniently,

68 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

and then we cut the surface over as even as possible, and in
some cases we plough and level it, and then we draw on sand
or gravel at the rate of about a cart load to a square rod of
ground, and then cart on fifteen or twenty loads of good
manure per acre, and spread evenly over the ground, and then
harrow it thoroughly. After that’sow it to herds-grass, clover,
and redtop seed. The latter part of August is considered the
best time for seeding, but it will do very well later in the
season. Land reclaimed in this way, we consider the most
valuable land we have ; it will generally yield two good crops of
first quality hay a season.”

These are selected not as being the only writers who speak
of this subject in this manner, but as giving in the main a fair
representation of the general feeling in the different sections of
the State. As we might anticipate, this feeling does not pre-
vail universally. One writer in Bristol County, says :—“ But
little attention has been paid to reclaiming land; most farmers
think it better to let the swamp and very rough land come into
wood. <A few have paid some attention to it, and find it pays
well; but most farmers say they cannot afford it, labor is so
high. I am of the opinion that not more than two hundred
acres have been reclaimed.” Others, in other sections of the
State, use lancuage very similar; still all seem to entertain the
opinion that there is an increasing interest in this subject, a
more earnest inquiry into the best processes of reclaiming, and
a general impression that “it will pay.” In short, men begin to
see that we must have better lands and a higher degree of cul-
ture. When they carry out in their practice the conclusions
which they now feel themselves forced to admit, our waste lands
will be reclaimed to fruitfulness and beauty.

IMPROVEMENT OF PASTURES.

As I have before intimated there has been an increase of the
whole number of acres in tillage; yet in nearly one-half of the
whole State there is a gradual and constant decrease, much
of the land formerly tilled being given up to pasturage. In
very many towns the number of acres in pasturage, also, is
decreasing, many old pastures having become so poor as to
be abandoned to bushes, or converted into woodland. The

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 69

following statement of the condition of things in parts of Es-
sex County will apply equally well to some other sections of
the State:—“Pasture lands for the last twenty years have
been on the decrease. Except where they are ploughed and
manured they become mossy, run over to bushes, and are
rapidly getting into wood.”

The number of acres in pasturage in 1840 was about 1,210,-
154. In 1850 it had increased somewhat, and the returns gave
1,311,210 acres, capable of keeping 273,301 cows, with the help
of the fall feed they could get on the other lands. This calcu-
lation allows about 43 acres to each cow.

It is a fact too well known, and too generally admitted to be
doubted, that many of our pasture lands are fast running out.
They were long since exhausted by constant cropping; some of
them for more than a century. Many thousand acres have
furnished all the milk, butter, and cheese sold from the farm,
without receiving so much as a pennyworth in return. In some
sections of the State, however, the matter is now beginning to
excite the serious consideration of farmers, and they are doing
something to provide summer feed for their stock.

So far as can be ascertained, complaints of this difficulty are
more frequent in the eastern part of the State than in the in-
terior and western part, where much of the pasture land has been
used less than a century, and some less than a half century ; and
where the greater attention paid to sheep husbandry has pre-
served them. In many fields and pastures of eastern Massachu-
setts the white-weed, or ox-eye daisy, has taken such exclusive
possession that it can scarcely be eradicated. It has been found
that this troublesome plant will not grow where sheep are
pastured, however firm a foothold it may have gained before
they are put on the land. If this be so, it would be judicious
in many cases for farmers to engage in the raising of sheep,
temporarily, at least.

In some parts of Essex County a plant is to be found com-
monly called wood-waxen—(Genista tinctoria)—introduced
originally by Governor Endicott as a garden flower. It has
spread over and taken exclusive possession of many hundred
acres, and is more difficult to extirpate, and more troublesome
than the white-weed even. Sheep eat this with great avidity,

70 BOARD_OF AGRICULTURE.

often preferring it to the best of grass, and soon kill it. If cut
and cured in the same manner, they prefer it to the best English
hay. Istate these facts respecting white-weed and wood-waxen
only on fhe authority of others, and not from actual personal
observation, but with the hope that they may be confirmed by
the experience of those who may endeavor to rid themselves
of these noxious weeds in the manner indicated above.

I have said that great care is required for the renovation of
our pasture lands. The work has already begun in some sec-
tions, as one or two brief extracts will show. A correspondent
in Worcester County, speaking of pastures in that section,
says there is but little variation in the number of acres: — In
many instances farmers have suffered unproductive portions of
pasture lands to be abandoned to wood, particularly the light
soils, on which the pine readily springs up; while others have
appropriated their vacant clearings to pasturage, thereby equal-
ling the number of acres of pasture land. Farmers are now
directing their attention to the improvement of pasture land,
by ploughing thoroughly and seeding with herds-grass, redtop
and clover, and using plaster very extensively, which suits
most of the soil of the town. This application has been in use
for many years, particularly on our hill lands. As the town is
quite elevated and reposes on the granite formation, the use of
plaster would be found valuable over nearly its entire surface.”

Another in Middlesex writes -—“ As our woodland increases,
our tillave and pasturage diminish. A large proportion of land,
formerly improved as pasturage or tillage land, is now under
a promising growth of young wood, which is the most profit-
able crop we can raise here; it will grow without our paying
laborers nine shillings a day to hoe up weeds.”

These may be regarded as indicative of the attention paid to
pasture lands in different sections of the State. In some places
some real and positive improvement has been made—in others,
no pains have been taken even to prevent deterioration. If,
instead of absolute neglect, the farmer could plant the piney
and hasten the transformation into woodland, it might be the
most economical disposition that could be made of these worn-
out pastures; but the practice in the majority of cases is to
leave them uncared for till the bushes get the possession; im

SECRETARY’S REPORT. © 71

the mean time there is so little feed for the cattle that they
attack the young trees, thus essentially retarding their growth,
and very much prolonging the period during which the land
must remain nearly unproductive.

WoopLanD.

The constant and rapid decrease of our woodland is often
spoken of with serious apprehension. It is thought by some
that the time is not far distant when our once beautiful forests
will have been entirely swept away. They forget that the
earth has now the same power of reproduction that she had
in the beginning. If this fear be entertained only in relation
to timber land, properly so called, there may be some ground
for it. The wood in most of our forests is undoubtedly smaller
than it was many years ago, or, in other words, a larger propor-
tion of it is small compared with the forests of an earlier day.

The number of acres of woodland in 1840 was reported to
be 729,792. In 1850 it had advanced to 896,450, showing an
increase in ten years of 166,658 acres, or an annual increase of
16,665 acres. This does not look much like the entire destruc-
tion of our woods. The apprehension alluded to may have
arisen from the fact that a large quantity of old and lone stand-
ing timber has been cut within the last twenty years. The
land formerly occupied by this is omitted in an unofficial reckon-
ing, and considered as no longer woodland; it is forgotten that
in such cases much of the land has been left to grow up again
to fofest. A large proportion of what has been converted into
tillage, mowing or pasture land, has been reclaimed from bog
meadows, swamps or ponds, while little woodland, comparative-
ly, has been cleared and tilled, and many old pastures have
become well wooded from neglect. Even in the county of
Essex, where this impression prevails as gencrally as elsewhere,
the official returns show a positive increase.

It is estimated that in Barnstable alone, one of the smallest
countics in the State, nearly fifteen hundred acres have
been planted with pines within the last fifteen or twenty years,
while much pasture land has grown up from the gradual opera-
tion of the causes before referred to.

Thus, after making all reasonable allowance for any crrors,

72 BOARD“OF AGRICULTURE.

which may have crept into the statistics relied on, we may still
anticipate that future returns will show the existence of the
same causes now in operation, and that they will continue to
produce the same effects which they have done hitherto, not-
withstanding our growing population and the increasing demand
for arable land.

A class of lands has been already mentioned, with a query
whether it would not be true economy to make woodland of
them, subjecting others less exhausted to cultivation in their
stead. Many thousand acres of poor and worn-out lands may
be found in the eastern part of the State and elsewhere, which,
for all practical purposes of cultivation, may be considered as
worthless, the net profits from them not being worth estimating.
Such lands as I have intimated, have already been planted with
pitch pine to a considerable extent; and as many acres have
been visited for the purpose of examining the progress of the
experiments, it is proper here to state the methods which have
been pursued with success.

The pitch pine is adapted to a light sandy soil, or to one
which has been exhausted by continued cropping. On such a
soil it will do well, even in the early part of its growth, if no
attention at all be paid to it; whereas, if it stands on rich land,
with a deep mould and full of organic matter, the grasses and
weeds too often check its early growth, if indeed they do not
entirely destroy it.

The seed of the pine may often be purchased at about one
dollar a quart. It is usually gathered in October by taking
the new cones from the trees, before they have been opened by
the frost, so as to allow their seed to fall. These cones should
be kept free from moisture, and dried in the sun, or by artificial
heat. When dry, the seeds become loosened and drop from
the cones, or they may be threshed out. They are cleaned by
rubbing and winnowing. In Kurope it is generally considered
better to sow thickly in beds; when about three years old the
trees are transplanted. This course is not generally pursued
here on account of the labor of transplanting, though if the soil
were worth any thing for pasturage during these two or three
years, it would probably be advisable to adopt it. The seed
may be sown either in autumn or in early spring. Many use

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 73

the hoe for making the holes, and drop the seed by hand;
others plough furrows six feet apart and drop the seeds in the
bottom of the furrow from one to two feet apart. This requires
too much time and labor if the plantation is to be very large.
A simple machine has been contrived for dropping the seed at
the proper distance, by which a man with a horse may plant
five or six acres in a day, which is quite as much as he could
plough with furrows at the distance of six feet in the same
length of time. This machine costs from three and a half to
five dollars.

About a quart of seed is generally allowed to four acres.
If it be of good quality, this is commonly found to be a sufficient
quantity. Probably, however, planting a little thicker would
secure a more perfect exemption from any difficulty arising from
accident or bad seed.

The transplanting of young white pines may be effected with
safety at almost any season of the year, provided, in taking
them up the bark of the roots is not strained and broken, or
loosened. The roots may be cut off with much greater safety
than their bark can be broken. By careful attention to this
precaution more than a thousand young white pines were trans-
planted by a farmer in Bristol County, with the loss of only one
or two.

Among other very valuable trees may be mentioned the
yellow locust, on sandy land, both on account of its intrinsic
value as wood, and the benefit to dry pasture lands. The
Scotch larch, has also been planted, to considerable extent, and
for rapidity of growth, value for timber and beauty, is one of
the most desirable additions to the farm. The silver poplar on
light soils and exposed situations, is also of great value, as
are also the white birch, the chestnut, and, as an ornament un-
surpassed, the graceful elm.

MANURES.

As the necessity of a better culture begins to be felt, the
preservation and application of manures must, of course, attract
much attention. All eminent success in farming, in a great
measure, depends uponthem. Some, indeed, have gone so far
as to say that the whole science of agriculture consists in pro-

10

,

74. BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

ducing the greatest possible amount of manure at the least
possible cost.

We have seen that it was the practice of the early settlers to
use their lands till they would no longer produce remunerative
crops, and then abandon them, to subject others to the same
process. This was what might have been expected, from any
people situated as they were. No account was made of manure.
The only object was to get rid of it.

Much progress has, undoubtedly, been made by our farmers
in this department of agriculture. By many individuals the
subject has been carefully investigated, and far more manure is
made, and that of a better quality, than formerly. In every
part of the State, too, more care is taken to enclose the cattle
in summer, to cover the manure heap in winter, and to supply
the sty—the laboratory of the farm—with muck and loam.
But our lands require more manure than they did a century, or
even a half century ago, and progress in this direction has
hardly more than kept pace with our increasing necessities.
We should not be content to keep our lands merely as good as
they were when they came into our possession. Every energetic
and enterprising farmer will be determined to increase the
value and productive power of his farm, as well as to draw an
annual income from it. But ifour fields are to be thus improved,
and their cultivation is to be systematically carried on, much
more yet remains to be done in regard to the preparation and
use of manures.

It may be well for us to look at the amount of the loss
occasioned by our carelessness and inattention in relation to
this matter. It is estimated that at least seventy-five per cent.
more manure might be made in the State than there now is, if
reasonable care were taken. In many localities there might be
an increase of one hundred per cent. without any difficulty, and
in a few it might be three or four times that amount.

A few brief extracts from the many letters received by me
will serve to show the feeling in different sections of the Com-
monwealth, on this subject, and the degree of attention paid to
it. A correspondent in the western part of Worcester County,
says, that the manure im most common use there, is “barn
manure and compost, in about equal quantities, spread in spring

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 75

for corn and root crops, and covered with a plough, harrow, or
cultivator. Much attention is paid to composting by most
farmers. Farmers differ somewhat in regard to the most profit-
able manner of doing it. But few men among us would think
of building a barn without a cellar of some sort. The way
most practised at present, is to cart loam or muck into the
cellar in the fall, and fork it over with the manure from the
cattle made during winter, before using in spring. Few of the
farmers, (myselfamong them,) have adopted a new plan of saving
manure—that is, dig a cellar about four or five feet deep, put
up stanchions from the bottom of the cellar to the scaffold floor,
about four feet apart, (tie with chains,) then fill the cellar within
three feet of the barn floor with loam or muck, which will enable
any full grown animal to eat with ease and convenience from
the floor, arranged in such manner as to prevent the wasting
of hay. The manure is forked back from the animal every
morning for a week or so, and littered with cut straw or hay,
leaves, brakes, saw-dust, shavings, &c. &c., then forked for-
ward under the animal and covered with litter, raising the
animal nearer the floor, until the stable or cellar is filled, which
usually takes until the time of using in spring; then carted
out and covered with a small plough as fast as spread, to de-
compose with the earth, and thereby saving a loss that a heap
of compost undergoes while ina state of fermentation. The
muck in the bottom of the cellar, answers as an absorbent to
take up that part of the liquid that is not retained in the litter.
Cattle can be kept much cleaner than on a floor without litter,
taking no more than is necessary for an absorbent.

“The foregoing is the manner that a few of us practise in
making manure, and preparing the ground for the corn crop.
Compost is usually preferred for the root crops. Some farmers
have top-dressed their mowing lands with the above-mentioned
-kind of manure, sowing plaster over the same as fast as spread,
to prevent evaporation, and are well satisfied with the result.
The saturated muck in the bottom of the cellar, if not too
strong, (if so mix more muck,) answers all purposes, where com-
post is usually used. The manure is trodden so hard there is
no fermentation until moved, and the cattle lie almost as easy
and comfortable as on the ground, the liquid passing into the

76 BOARD “OF AGRICULTURE.

litter and muck below, saving all there is. In the manner
above described, one hundred per cent. increase may be made.”

In the southern part of Berkshire, also, “Mostly barnyard
manure is used, which is spread in the usual way. Our farmers
are beginning to pay some attention to the subject of compost-
ing, but as yet, except in a few cases, but little progress has
been made. Swamp muck, yard manure, lime, ashes and leaves,
are the principal ingredients used. The increase per cent. in
manures which might be made on our farms, is large; for our
farmers, as a general thing, are extremely careless in regard to
the saving of manure.”

And in the northern part of the same county, “ Barn manure,
plaster, to some extent, and occasionally guano and bone
dust. Very little attention is paid to composting. One hun-
dred per cent. increase might be made by care in saving manure.”

In the county of Franklin, a correspondent writes -—“ Barn-
yard manures are chiefly used, applied mostly to tillage, and
more generally spread on and harrowedin. There has been but
little attention paid to composting; not enough to determine
what is the most profitable way of doing it.

“JT think that, with feasonable care, there might be some
fifty per cent. Increase of manure by the use of muck, lime, and
ashes, &e.”

In Norfolk County, “Animal manures are chiefly used; the
most of which are applied to ploughed land. Much attention
is paid to composting, and the most profitable mode of pre-
paring compost, is probably by mixing muck or soil, with ani-
mal manure ina barn cellar, over which a stock of cattle or
horses is kept.”

In Middlesex, “The farmers depend upon the natural re-
sources of the farm for their fertilizers, such as the droppings
of the stalls, collections of the pigsty, coarse grasses, weeds,
leaves, &c.; but chiefly, after the droppings of the stalls, that
‘Mother of the meal chest,’ meadow muck,—the most convenient,
cheapest, and best absorbent and fertilizer, all things consid-
ered, that can be used to increase the products of our land.
It is found in great quantities in the town, and of excellent
quality, and is beginning to be properly appreciated. But they
avail themselves of such other helps as they can command in

SECRETARY’S REPORT. iy

the use of ashes, lime, super-phosphates, salt, saltpetre, guano,
&e. The base of their composts is meadow mud; this is dug
and exposed to the sun, rains and frost, for several months, and
then mingled with the more concentrated manures already
mentioned.”

Another intelligent and practical farmer writes :—“ Barn and
compost manures are chiefly used, and mostly applied to the
hills—a practice I am not much in favor of, unless we can plough
in a large quantity to sustain the ear in its growth. Some of
us top-dress our grass land with compost, applied after harvest-
ing. Some of the farmers here bring night manures from the
cities and villages, in the cold season, and compost it with mud
and other soil, in considerable quantities. Ashes are used on
all kinds of soil to advantage. Gypsum is used in the hill for
potatoes, some think to advantage; others have a different
opinion. Gypsum and lime have proved of very little service,
applied to our soil. Mud seems to be the principal ingredient
in composting with our stable and privy manures. Leached
ashes, clay, and coal dust, are excellent applications for our
porous soil. Guano has not reached us yet; the uncertainty
of its goodness, ignorance of applying it, and high prices de-
manded for it, will prove an obstacle to its introduction here,
for some time tocome. People differ in their theories about com-
posting manure ; some of us compost our manures in low places
which receive the wash of the barnyard, or the road, and
have an idea that the process of composting requires a great
deal of humidity, more than what naturally gets into a barn
cellar; others compost in barn cellars, and where swine are
kept, and this may be the better way.”

The same writer says that double the quantity of manure
might easily be made.

In the county of Barnstable, also, they use “ Barnyard and
stable manures, and sea-weed, ploughed in, in the spring, for
hoed crops. But little attention paid to composting. One
hundred per cent. increase, certainly. I think I should be safe
in saying two hundred, by composting sea-weed, muck, and
marsh mud; but few farmers but that have one of these sub-
stances handy and in abundance; many farmers have all of
them.”

78 BOARD, OF AGRICULTURE.

Another correspondent, in the interior of the State, writes
as follows :—

“'The manure heap is the farmer’s bank, and his interest may
increase in proportion to the amount of capital he yearly
lays in.

“Not much attention is paid to composting manures. But
few make it, except as wash, loam or muck—of which last
article, some farmers have an abundance—are, in the fall, carted
into the cowyard or hogpen, to receive the droppings from the
cattle or the swine during the coming winter and summer, after
which it is carted either for top-dressing to grass, or to the
field for the corn hill the next season.

“ But few farmers among us have as yet made cellars to their
barns. This is a great omission; a neglect detrimental to the
interest of the farmer, and of course to the whole community.

“Let him who may, speak against the place and the practice,
experience has shown to me that the barn cellar is the place to
make manure. By proper attention, the farmer may double the
quantity of manure, naturally made from his crops, and retain
the quality equal to that of green manure which is flung through
the window, and suffered to remain exposed to the rain,
the sun, and the wind. In the cellar is saved not only the
excrement, but the urine, which is absorbed by the material
which has been carted into the cellar; all which before being
used, should be thoroughly mixed. This may be done in dull
or stormy weather. The gases may be retained by an occa-
sional sprinkling of gypsum over the heap, while the better
qualities of the heap, which are exposed to the weather, are
generally lost in the atmosphere.

“Coarse, or green manures, are generally applied to fields
designed for corn. And taking our fields as a whole—having
clay subsoil—it is considered better to spread the manure on
the surface and plough it in, rather than plough first, then
spread and harrow in the manure. Gaseous matter tends
upward, and when the manure is buried by the plough, what-
ever may attempt to escape will be more likely to be received
by, and retained in the soil, than if slightly covered by the
harrow.”

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 79

Still further west, from the county of Berkshire, a practical
farmer writes as follows :-—

“T have been in the practice of making a compost heap, for
several years, of about one hundred loads. My mode of
making is as follows: to one load of manure use two loads of
rich soil and turf. I commence by a layer of two loads of
loam and then one of manure, and continue in this manner until
I finish my heap. I generally make it in the fall; it would be
as well to do it in the spring, if there is time. In the spring,
I work it over, put into it one hundred bushels of ashes, a few
bushels of salt, and half a ton of plaster, and it is ready for
use. It is good for top-dressing on grass land, and for any
crop you may wish to cultivate.

“T think that any of our farmers might double the quan-
tity of manure, by collecting vegetable material about the
farm, that goes to waste, and the use of muck, turf, and rich
soil, keeping the hogyard well replenished, and have the com-
post heap the place to put every thing that will add to that
which is valuable for manure. All compost manures should be
well pulverized and mixed.”

To close these extracts, and as a fair specimen of a large
number of interesting and valuable letters received on this
subject, from all parts of the State, I give the following :—

“The manure principally used, is that made by cattle and
hogs. Little attention is paid to composting. Some use loam,
or muck, in quantities sufficient to prevent waste of the liquid
part of the manure; beyond this, some think that the labor of
carting is more than the advantage gained.

“T have no doubt that one hundred per cent. might be added
to the value of manure, by saving the liquid portion and keep-
ing the whole under cover, preventing, as far as possible, the
escape of the gases, by composting with muck, gypsum, or any
other matter by which the escape of the ammonia may be
arrested. Most of our farmers expose their manure to the
weather, when by simply keeping it under cover they would
save, at least, one-third of its value.”

These extracts, and many others that might be given, if
space allowed, show the enormous loss that is sustained, for
the want of a little additional care and labor; loss not only to

80 BOARD- OF AGRICULTURE.

the farmer, whom it more directly affects, but to the whole
community.

There are in the State, more than 75,000 barns, the returns
of 1840 showing 63,816, and those of 1850 increasing the
number to 74,764: at the same ratio of increase, there would
now be not less than 80,000. It is thought that five cords of
manure—of 1024 bushels each—is a small allowance for each
of these barns, since in many towns, and in some entire coun-
ties, the average is considerably greater. But suppose it to be
only five cords—or about seventeen loads of thirty bushels—
to each. This manure may be estimated at three dollars a
cord. In some counties, from four to six dollars can be ob-
tained for it without difficulty, and that, too, where the pur-
chaser is obliged to haul it to the distance of five or ten miles,
as is often the case. But putting the price at only three
dollars, and the number of barns at only 75,000, and the
number of cords of manure to each, at only five, all of which
are thought to be small estimates, the number of cords now
made in the State, would be 375,000, which may be valued at
$1,125,000. The best judges think that an increase of one
hundred per cent. might easily be made, on an average, through-
out the State. If this be true, the Commonwealth annually
suffers a loss of $1,125,000 at least, by neglect in this single
department.

Probably a greater quantity might be made, but I have esti-
mated only that quantity which it is thought by careful observ-
ers might be prepared by the great mass of farmers, without
any very great expenditure of time and labor, from the
resources of the farm itself. This does not include that limited
number of farmers who already make, perhaps, nearly as
much as possible, without too great cost.

If the loss now sustained every year by the exportation of
bones from the State, and by the want of better arrangements
for saving the sewerage of cities, and the sweepings of the
streets of large towns, were added to the above, the amount
would be swollen to upwards of $2,000,000.

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 81

STock.

We have much reason to be gratified by the great improve-
ment which is exhibited in our neat cattle. The condition of
the stock first introduced into this State, has already been
alluded to. We have seen that for nearly four years the
colony at Plymouth was wholly destitute of cattle.

The date of the first importations is known, the color of the
animals is known, and the very names of the individual cows
have been preserved, so that we have an exact register of
every thing relating tothem. One, for instance, was black, one
was white bellied, another brindle. There is no sufficient evi-
dence that these cattle came from the county of Devon, as
some suppose, and it is known to be a fact, that black was the
favorite color at that time in the colony, for the reason already
given. The supposition loses much of its weight, also, when
we remember, that though the prevailing color of stock in the
county of Devon was probably red, (though of this there is no
sufficient evidence,) yet that no such rade or breed as the North
Devons then existed. They were built up at a far later day by
a system of judicious breeding. The great change which has
been effected in English cattle may be said to have been begun
by Bakewell, towards the close of the last century. Since
then, rapid advances have been made in consequence of the
exertions of such men as Colling, the Earl of Leicester, and
others.

But, notwithstanding these great improvements abroad, little
interest was felt in the subject here till within the last
thirty or forty years. Some attempts have been made since
then, to improve the stock which had sprung from the animals
80 early imported, and with some degree of success. Of late
years, there is reason to believe, better shelter, better feed,
and better care have greatly improved what are sometimes called
the “natives,” or the “native stock of New England.” In
addition to this general improvement in management, an infu-
sion of foreign blood has undoubtedly been very beneficial in
many cases. While this process has been going on, the num-
ber of domestic animals has increased as the resources of the
State have developed. In 1840, there were 143,591 cows,

11

82 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

three years old and upwards. In 1850, there were 152,911, an
increase of 9,320 in ten years. The oxen four years old and
upwards numbered 46,584, in 1840; 49,986, in 1850; making
an increase of 3,402 in the same time. The number of steers
and heifers one year old and upwards, was about 88,562, in
1840, while in 1850, it was reported to be 76,703; showing a
decrease of 11,859. But the number of horses had increased
in the ten years from 60,030, to 74,060; or at the rate of
1,403 annually.

These official statistics show, to some extent, the change which
has taken place in some parts of the State in regard to breed-
ing or raising stock. The number of steers and heifers under
three years old, was 11,859 less in 1850 than in 1840; giving
an annual decrease of 1,185, and showing that instead of rais-
ing more stock on our farms, to satisfy the wants of our people,
we had become more and more dependant on other states.

The number of cattle brought from without the Commonwealth
to supply our markets, and to meet the necessities of our far-
mers, is now very great; far greater, it is thought, than the num-
ber raised within our own borders. In many places it is sup-
posed to be cheaper to purchase young stock, than to raise it.
The consequence is, that comparatively little attention is paid to
the raising of stock in eastern Massachusetts, though on account
of the increased price now asked for this stock, there is a per-
ceptible change, even within the last three years, and more at-
tention is now paid to raising it. A farmer of Essex County,
writes thus :—“No attention is given to breeding. The farm-
ers buy their heifers at hazard, and their pigs, or shotes in the
same way, mostly. One person has a breed of pigs which he
has had for eighteen years, and which he much esteems. The
first was of unknown origin. Some pork and beef are marketed
out of town, but it is supposed that as much is purchased from
abroad for the use of the town.”

Another, in the eastern part of Worcester County, says :—
“No attention to the breeding of stock. There were introduced,
a few years ago, the short-horned Durham, and the Holderness.
I may add that our farmers, in their purchases, take great pains
in the selection of the stock, and are willing to pay liberally,

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 83

But little stock is raised in the town—none with the milk
farmers.”

These extracts show the prevailing practice in the eastern
part of the State, and accounts from every town heard from,
are to the same effect. As we approach the western part of
the State, however, the aspect of the testimony changes, and
the prevailing opinion, in that region, is exhibited in the follow-
ing brief extracts. The first is from an experienced farmer in
the central part of Worcester County. He says :—“ But little
attention has as yet been paid to blood in stock. But little
stock has been raised here for many years. The farmers have
been supplied with stock from Brighton market, and it comes
of all sorts, colors, and qualities, as well as a mixture of all
bloods. This has caused a deterioration in the quality of stock
in this town, which farmers are beginning to open their eyes to,
and many, who in former days sold their calves to grace the
butcher’s stall, now keep their best calves to grace their own
stalls.”

In the southern part of the same county, also, a correspond-
ent writes thus :— “But little attention has been paid to the
rearing of stock, the farmers generally selling their calves, and
purchasing from droves. The farmers, however, are turning
their attention to the rearing of their own stock, and some fine
animals have recently been introduced into the town. Our
oxen and cows are of an improved order. Cows will probably
yield, on an average, from twelve to fourteen quarts per day,
during the summer months, and some will far exceed it.”

And in the western part of the county, the report is, “Farm-
ers are improving their stock very much; nearly one hundred
per cent. better now, than years ago.” And going still farther
west into Hampshire County, we find :—“A high degree of at-
tention has been paid to the breeding of neat cattle and sheep.
The most esteemed breed of milch cows and working oxen, with
us, has been the short-horned Durham, mixed with ‘natives.’
The Herefords are also coming into note, and are now, so far
as tried, much esteemed. The average quantity of our cows,
of different breeds, will not (say for nine months) vary much
from ten quarts of milk, and ten ounces of butter per day,
though there are many animals that will much exceed this esti-

84 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

mate. The number of full-blooded animals in our town is not
large; but of neat cattle, sufficient to cross with our mixed
stock. The number of full-blooded animals is as follows :—
Durhams, six; Herefords, two.”

In the adjoining county of Franklin:—<The breeding, or
raising of stock may, perhaps, be said to be the most important
branch of agriculture in this town. Large numbers are raised
and sold to drovers, at two and three years old, with a fair
amount of oxen and fat cows; and for a few years past, per-
haps no branch of farming has paid the farmer better.”

Another correspondent in Franklin County writes :—* More
attention has been paid to raising neat cattle, than any other
branch of farming. I question whether there is a town in the
State, that can exhibit a neat stock equal to Shelburne, that is,
of their own raising. The breed is a mixture of Durhams with
what are called ‘the natives... We have been in the habit of
purchasing Durham bulls for twenty-five years, so that our
whole stock is from one-half to seven-eighths Durham.

“We have no full-blooded animals, except bulls. Sucha breed
as we raise we consider the most profitable, both for the dairy
and for working oxen. Our best working oxen, in September,
at four years old, weigh from 3,500 to 4,000. Some of the
best cows give from thirty-five to fifty-five pounds of milk.”

Advancing still farther west into the county of Berkshire, we
find that:—“Breeding of stock, receives a great deal of atten-
tion, so much so that our native stock has been brought up
from almost nothing, to a point which reflects honor and great
credit upon our breeders. The progress has been slow, but
sure, and we now think we can take the premium at any cattle
show in our State, for native stock. This result has been
brought about by selecting and crossing with the best breeds
in our town and vicinity; it is across with the short-horn Dur-
ham in most cases, but many cross with the Devons. Our
short-horn Durham cross is our best, and cannot be surpassed.

“The variety of opinions in regard to which is the best breed
of milch cows is so great that I hardly dare to offer an opinion;
but as you ask the question, I should say, in my judgement, a
cross of the Alderney with our native stock, would be the best.
The dairy interest of our town is very large, therefore we

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 85

want the best cows for such purposes, and the cross just men-
tioned, I think, will come the nearest to it. For working oxen,
a cross of the Devons with our native stock, is considered the
best, they being the most active and docile.”

These selections are made not as the only ones which express
the opinions contained in them, but because each of them is
supposed to be a fair representation of the state of ‘things in
the vicinity of the writer.

The prevailing opinions in regard to the respective merits of
different breeds of cattle vary so much in different localities,
that it is difficult to tell precisely which are most generally
esteemed. We have already seen that in the western part of
the State the Durhams are the most highly valued for some
purposes, while the Devons are better liked for others.
Probably the former are more widely distributed in that region
than the latter; this, however, may arise from the fact that they
are better known and more fully appreciated. It was, also,
the opinion of a late celebrated farmer of Plymouth County,
that the improved short-horns were the finest cattle in the
world, and were to be preferred where good feed was plenty
and the climate was not too severe. The Western States, he
thought, might answer these conditions, and many whose
opinion should have much weight with us, believe the Valley of
the Connecticut to be equally well suited to them on account of
its rich pastures and its abundant feed.

On the other hand, the Devons are preferred in many other
parts of the State. Their beautiful color recommends them
everywhere. The number of “full-blooded” animals of this
breed in the State is not far from two hundred.

The Ayrshires are highly prized in some sections, while the
Alderneys, or Jerseys, are equally esteemed by many on
account of the richness of their milk. This breed has not, as
yet, been very extensively tried. There are only about seventy-
five of full blood in the State, exclusive of calves under six
months old. Probably the result will be that different breeds
will be selected for special purposes; for working oxen,
particularly for the road, the Devons may come into favor;
for size and the market, the Durhams may obtain the prefer-
ence; for milk, or for butter, the Ayrshires, Devons, Jerseys,

86 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

or animals of no known breeds may be better liked, each breed
being applied to the use for which it is best fitted. Local
circumstances will often govern the farmer, and a proper regard
to his own interest will lead him to select and raise animals
best adapted to his wants.

In the mean time efforts are needed to raise up, from our
present stock, as a basis, a race that shall be sufficiently distinct
to be called a breed, and shall be adapted especially to the
wants of our State and climate. This stock is far better than
that with which Bakewell and other distinguished breeders
began, and offers great inducements for the application of
science and skill.

While labor continues to be so high, it will be for the interest
of the farmer to keep a few superior animals, rather than many
of a poorer class; and, when a change is made, animals of fine
shape and color, other things being equal, will cost no more
than those inferior in these respects. In addition to the greater
pecuniary profit derived from them, fine animals give a much
greater interest to the labors of farming, and are in themselves
a source of pride and pleasure to the possessor. The condition
of the farmer may often be judged of by the appearance of his
stock, and his manner of keeping it. Inferior animals, worn
out by labor, and showing the effects of hunger and neglect,
lead one to look at the implements of the farm, the buildings
and the general mode of management, and even if they do not
show the plain signs of mortgages, they will be very likely to lead
the beholder to fear that if the meadows are not drained, some-
thing else is. It has been said that the man who neglects his
animals, and the means of improving them, does not deserve to
thrive. It is a sentiment the justice of which we may all admit.

SHEEP.

The number of sheep in this Commonwealth in 1840, was
343,390; it decreased at the average rate of 16,396 annually,
till, in 1850, it was only 179,428. They are kept principally
in the interior and western parts of the State.

The competition of the Western States has, undoubtedly,
been one of the most operative causes which have produced the
decrease. Large flocks range freely over their vast prairies,

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 8T

and the wool can be thrown into our markets at a cost of about
one cent per pound. With such competitors, our wool-growers
find it difficult to contend. In other respects, the advantage is
rather in our favor. Our provision markets must be supplied
from a nearer source, and this will probably make it profitable
for us to pay more attention to the raising of sheep. Many
localities in the western part of the State are admirably adapted
to this branch of husbandry. It would probably be for the
interest of many farmers, even in the eastern portions, to
engage in this business. Mutton and lamb will, doubtless, long
continue to command a ready sale in the neighborhood of Boston.
The price, when compared with the cost of raising, is such that
they can be made profitable, particularly if those breeds be
selected which fatten easily. My own experience, in the State
of Maine, though limited to three years, was enough to convince
me that a few sheep would be an efficient means of renovating
the worn-out pastures of eastern Massachusetts. They eat off
and destroy the bushes, white-weed and wood-waxen, and soon
bring in a thick mat of white clover and other sweet grasses.

It is thought by some that sheep may be pastured with cows,
and that a number of the former equal to the number of the
latter, which the pasture will support, may be kept there with-
out injury. This was the opinion of some, in whose judgment
the farming community have placed great confidence. Inquiries
have been made by letter, in different parts of the State, to
ascertain the opinion of men experienced in sheep husbandry
on this point. The following remarks of a practical farmer and
wool-grower, in the western part of the State, well express
the opinions which seem to be entertained by all heard from :-—

“Sheep, as well as all other animals, have a relish for the
sweetest and most fattening productions of the earth, and no
animal that the farmer keeps has a greatcr dislike to coarse,
rank grass, than the sheep; consequently they run over and
tread down, in search for the best and sweetest food, good,
healthy grasses, that cows or neat stock would eat freely and
do well on. This, however, is not all; sheep are a strong-
scented animal, and wherever they huddle for any length of
time, cattle will not readily feed; therefore, I think they never
should be allowed to run together.”

88 BOARD“OF AGRICULTURE.

The breeds of sheep most esteemed in the State, seem to be
those which haye more or less of Merino blood in them. The
Merinos of Spain, so celebrated for their beauty and the fine-
ness of their wool, have been known and valued for ages.
Bucks of this breed were sometimes purchased in Spain at the
rate of a talent ($1,200) a piece, by the ancient Greeks, nearly
twenty-five centuries ago. ‘They were first imported into the
United States in 1802, three or four having been obtained by
Chancellor Livingston, then Minister to France. These had
belonged.to the celebrated Rambouillet flock, which Louis XVI.
had obtained as a favor of Charles IV. in 1786. A short time
before, Gen. Humphreys, Minister to Spain from 1797 to 1801,
had purchased two hundred Merinos, had them sent through
Portugal, and shipped to this country. At that time, as has
been intimated in another connection, but little interest was
felt in the improvement of our stock, and these animals attract-
ed no notice for some years. In 1808, however, the embargo
led many to turn their attention to wool-growing, and fine wool
soon rose to the high price of $1.50 and $2 a pound. In
1809-10 no less than 3,650 Merinos were imported, and these
were distributed throughout the United States. The impor-
tance of these early importations can hardly be overestimated.
They furnished our woollen manufactories with the raw material
at times when it would have been expensive and almost impos-
sible to obtain it abroad.

To show, in some degree, how extensively the different
breeds have spread through the western part of the State, and
how important an interest sheep husbandry has become in that
region, I give a few extracts from letters received from men
engaged in it.

A farmer of Berkshire County writes as follows :—

“Merino sheep that will shear from three to three and a half
pounds of wool, worth, the present year, about fifty-three cents,
are mostly kept. While some keep mixtures of Leicester, South
Down and Cotswold, selling the lambs for mutton, others
keep good weighty Merino ewes, and let them run with coarse
bucks, selling the lambs in July or August, at some $2 per
head, and the ewes shearing some $1.50 worth of wool; the
wool paying the year’s keeping of ewes, leaving the lambs to

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 89

profit account. Mutton lambs find a quick sale, and I think the
latter method the most profitable. The lambs are only kept
while the feed is the best and most plenty, leaving the ewes to
get fleshy for winter. I sold my lambs the present season, the
first of August, from Merino ewes and coarse bucks, at $2.25,
and wool at fifty-two cents, sheep averaging about three pounds
of wool. Lambs were dropped early in April. Common flocks
of sheep are worth about $2 per head, and good lots of
ewes $3.”

Another, writing from the same county, says :—

“Taree quantities of sheep are raised. The majority of our
flocks consist of the Merino, Saxon, and a mixture of the English,
consisting of South Downs, Leicesters and Cotswolds. Some
Spanish Merinos have lately been introduced, which are cele-
brated for their great weight of fleece. This year sheep are
very high, but the average price for them is from $1.75 to $2.50.”

In Hampshire County, a correspondent writes thus :—

“The principal breed of sheep is Spanish, with a mixture of
Saxon, growing fine wool, worth, at clipping, this season, from
fifty-five to sixty-five cents, yielding fleeces of from three and
a half to four and a half pounds. Some entire flocks of fine
wool yield an average of four and a half pounds well washed
wool. Some flocks have been recently much improved by an
imported Silesian buck of uncommon fineness and evenness of
staple over the entire body, and the result of crossing has, with
the same keeping, raised the amount of wool at the first shear-
ing of the half bloods, one pound per head of dry wool over the
average of the flock from which they were bred, the old flock
averaging four and a half pounds, and the half-bloods five and
a half pounds, with increased fineness of fleece. The average
value of our sheep at this season of the year is about $3.

From Hampshire County, we have the following :—

“The principal breeds of sheep are the Merino, the Leicester-
shire, the South Down and Bakewell. When it was an object to
raise wool for the market, the Merino was the most profitable.
But as mutton is the object now, I think the South Down the:
most profitable ; they are sheep that give a great quantity of milk;
their meat is considered very fine; they frequently have two.

12

90 BOARD-OF AGRICULTURE.

lambs, and always get fit for market; average price from $2 to
$3 per head.”

Many other extracts might be given, from letters coming
from Western Massachusetts, but enough has been said to show
the general interest felt there in this subject. It is to be hoped
that farmers in the eastern counties will try the raising of
sheep to some extent, at least. They will find that fine mutton
is profitable, even if fine wool is not.

The South Downs seem to have the preference with those
who raise only for the market, and some very fine speci-
mens of this breed are to be found in the eastern counties.
The French Merinos have recently been introduced into other
sections, and though they have not yet been long enough tried
to make it possible to estimate precisely their comparative
value, they have already received no small share of attention.

SwINe.

Probably no one of our domestic animals has been more im-
proved than the swine. Importations have been many and
frequent, and either pure bloods or grades of the different
breeds are widely distributed in every county in the State.
The number of these animals has considerably decreased how-
ever, if official statistics are to be relied on; for we find that
in 1840, there were 90,335, while in 1850, only 73,041 were
reported, showing a decreasé in the ten years, of 17,294.
There has probably been a great increase since 1850.

This animal comes to maturity in so much less time than the
horse or the cow, that any breed supposed to be better than
others, soon becomes widely known, and is appreciated as it
deserves. There are, indeed, few animals so susceptible of
change and improvement in the hands of the breeder, partly for
the reason named, and partly because it easily and quickly
adapts itself to the circumstances in which it is placed.

The hog was brought here by the early settlers, and was one
of the most profitable animals they could have. Its power and
habit of providing for itself, when left to range freely, as it
was at that time, with little care on the part of the owner,
made it an object of special regard with them. No par-
ticular attention was paid to breeding, however, till towards

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 91

the end of the last century, though some new breeds grew up
in various ways. Thus a vessel sometimes arrived from the
East, from Europe, or China, having on board one or two ani-
mals which had not been used during the voyage. These being
brought on shore, sometimes introduced a new breed and some-
times modified the old ones. The Byfield breed was made in
this manner by a cross with the Chinese, one of which was thus
accidentally brought into the country.

The varieties now most esteemed in the State, are nearly as
various as the sections heard from and visited. A few extracts
from the letters received on this subject, will, to some extent,
serve to show what breeds are preferred, and how far it is
thought that pork can be raised with profit.

A correspondent in Franklin County, says:—“Our swine;
like all our other stock, are a mixture of breeds, of Berkshire,
Woburn and Suffolk. Itis difficult to tell which prevails most;
they however, altogether, make an excellent breed. We make
very little pork to sell. Most farmers kill their pigs at nine
and ten months old, which weigh from 250 to 400 pounds per
head. This is considered more profitable than to keep longer.
A small amount of pork can be raised on every farm with
profit ; beyond that, it does not pay the expense.”

A correspondent in the southern part of Berkshire County,
says :—“Our farmers have a breed which for beauty of form
weight of pork and profit, cannot be surpassed. Pigs weigh
ing fifty pounds, are worth from four to six dollars. The
large number of dairies in our town, render the raising of pork
one great source of profit to our farmers.”

Another, in the southern part of the same county, says :—
“The Suffolk swine are highly esteemed; but on trial, the full
blood prove too small for profit. A cross of the Suffolk with
the Bedford half-and-half bloods, make the most profitable swine
that has ever been kept in this town. And from this breed,
it is estimated that a handsome profit may be realized from the
raising of pork. I think the above breed, at least, thirty-three
per cent. more profitable than the ordinary kinds of swine.”

In Worcester County, a practical farmer writes :—'The
breed of swine in town, most esteemed, is what is called a

92 BOARD “OF AGRICULTURE.

mixture of Suffolk and Mackey; but our breed is so various,
that it is difficult to determine what blood prevails.

“Tt is believed that pork can be raised at a profit of, at least,
ten per cent. on the outlay. This belief is founded upon
experiments I have made, which have satisfied me that four
pounds of corn will make one pound of pork. Corn grown in
this neighborhood, will weigh sixty pounds the bushel, and one
bushel will make fifteen pounds of pork, beginning with a pig
at birth. The average price of corn for the last ten years, is
eighty-five cents a bushel. Twenty bushels, or 1,200 pounds,
will make 300 pounds of pork, the average price of which, for
the last ten years, has been 64 cents the pound. Taking these
premises, the account will stand thus :—

A pig at birth worth ; : é ; -. $0.50
20 bushels of corn, at 85 cents, : : tities
The time taken to consume the corn, and for the

hog to grow to 300 pounds weight, dressed,

would be from eight to ten months, say ten

months; the average time on which to charge

interest on the $17 50 cents outlay, would be

five months, which at six per cent. would be 4t

Whole cost of hog . . P . . $17 94
300 pounds of pork, at 64 ne . $19 50

Rough fat and pluck ate : i et)

Whole proceeds, :

Leaving a profit of . : ; : : . $2 06

Or more than eleven per cent. on the outlay, without taking
into the account the manure, which will pay, at least, one dol-
lar more than the cost of attendance.”

Another, in Norfolk County, writes thus :—“ The Suffolk are
esteemed, but being tender to rear. when young, are not much
kept. The Mackeys are approved by some. Many are aware
of avery wide difference in profit between the best breed and
the poorest, yet are not fully decided as to which of the highly
valued breeds will prove the most profitable after a thorough
trial.

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 93

“By taking into the account the value of the manure that
may be made for the farm, it appears to be the opinion of some
who have given attention to the subject, that it can usually be
raised with a small profit.”

In the county of Middlesex, a farmer writes as follows :-—
“We have the native, Suffolk, and Middlesex crosses, and a
few fine Suffolks. An equal blood of the Suffolk and native, is
considered the best. This gives the fine points desirable, with
more hardiness than the pure Suffolk has. Swine have been
greatly improved here within a few years,—and as much in
consequence of better attention, as in an improved breed.”

From these extracts we see that the Suffolk, or rather a
cross of the Suffolk with some other breed, holds the highest
place in public estimation in all parts of the State, for practi-
cal purposes on the farm. The farmer is well aware that the
pork of hogs of a medium size, and younger than formerly,
will command a higher price in the market. He begins to con-
sult the prevailing taste and fashion when he raises for the
market. He will select, therefore, animals that come to matu-
rity early, in preference to those which will uot do for the
market tilla more advanced age.

PouULTRY.

The raising of poultry has received no small share of atten-
tion by many farmers in the State, and in many cases with much
profit. With proper care in furnishing shelter and room in
winter sufficiently warm, light and dry, and furnished with food
and fresh water, hens will ordinarily continue to lay and grow
fat.

The sale of poultry in the metropolis alone, often amounts, it
is said, to more than a million of dollars a year. The demand
increases, and the market is always ready. By proper manage-
ment, too, they may be made of great service in destroying the
noxious insects which infest the crops. This subject would
seem to commend itself to the careful consideration of the
farmer.

To show what profit may be found in the judicious manage-
ment of fowls, the following statement of a practical farmer in
Norfolk County, may be given:—“There can be a profit of

94, BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

seventy-five per cent. realized on native fowls. Poultry and
eggs, pork, and Indian corn are among the best, if not the very
best products of the farm. Poultry needs more extended re-
marks. In the first place, select natives, crossed slightly with
the imported game; let your chickens be hatched in the month
of May, feed with dough made of Indian meal, till large enough
to eat corn whole, then feed entirely on corn the remainder of
the year. Select your best chickens to keep, the remainder
dispose of early. Keep your fowls laying for the remainder of
the year and it will be found profitable.”

Farm LApor.

An effort has been made to ascertain the relative proportion
of native and foreign laborers upon the farms of this State.
The customs vary so much in different sections that it is diffi-
eult to arrive at an accurate estimate. A large majority of the
returns made during the past season, show that intelligent
labor, throughout the State, is not only greatly preferred, but
commands a higher price than ignorant labor; that an ability
to work with the head as well as the hand, is appreciated
and sought for.

No better idea of the practices in the different sections can
be given, than by the extracts which follow. It will be seen
that in the eastern part of the State, foreign hired labor is
most common, and that it is employed to a limited extent, in
the western. An intelligent farmer of Berkshire says :—“But
few farmers employ foreigners. I know of but one employed
in that business, they mostly preferring manufacturing places,
The native youngsters are preferred, and have obtained the past
season from $13 to $16 per month. At least two dollars per
month less, is what the foreigner has obtained.”

Another, in the same county, says:—‘More native than
foreign labor is employed, at prices varying from $8 to $12 per
month.”

In a few towns of that county, however, more especially in
the central part, foreign labor is more common. One writes
thus :—“Of hired labor, three-fourths are foreigners, at an
average price of $13 per month, for six months; $1 per day for
haying, or, $150 for the year. Natives command $1.25 per day

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 95

for haying, $17 per month, for six months, or $175, or over, for
the year. Ido not think foreigners are worked to as good
advantage on our rough land as on smoother. They are, invari-
ably bad ox-teamsters; but we are forced to employ them, or
none. Household labor, almost exclusively foreign. Price
paid, $1.25 per week, on an average.”

In the western part of Franklin County, it is said:—“We
have no foreign laborers on our farms. Native labor averages
about $12 per month.”

Another statement in the same county, says :—“ Good labor-
ers, whether native or foreign, get from $15 to $20 per month.
Perhaps, one-ninth are foreign.”

The average of the four western counties of Berkshire, Hamp-
shire, Franklin, and Hampden, is found to be less than one-fifth,
and those are mostly Irish and French.

The central towns employ a larger proportion of foreigners
on farms; yet, in many of the towns, more remote from the
large centres of ‘population, it will be found that all the hired
labor is native.

In the eastern part of the State, on the other hand, by far
the larger proportion of hired farm laborers are foreign. It is
thought, that throughout the counties of Norfolk, Middlesex,
and Essex, more than three-fourths are foreign. In this respect,
there has been a great change within the last few years. Ten
or fifteen years ago, the hired labor in eastern Massachusetts
was obtained from New Hampshire, Maine, and Nova Scotia;
while within the last five years, comparatively few from those
places have presented themselves for hire.

In the county of Bristol, it is said :—* But few foreign labor-
ers are employed on our farms. Common laborers, (Americans, )
receive from $12 to $18 per month, and found, for six or eight
months in the year. The price of farm labor, per day, is about
75 cents and boarded, with the exception of haying, when the
price is from $1 to $1.50 per day and found.”

The same may be said of a large part of the county of
Barnstable, the proportion of native hired laborers being large.

It is evident from what has been said, that the number of
foreign hired farm laborers is increasing in all parts of the
State, and in some sections, more rapidly than in others.

96 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

PrRorits oF FARMING.

After the examination we have been engaged in, of the vari-
ous sources from which the farmer is to draw his profits, it
may not be inappropriate to consider what these profits are,
and how they are to be increased. It is a significant fact, that
in a large portion of the State, the value of farm land, as such,
is either positively decreasing, or remains just what it was
some years ago. From Worcester County, we have the follow-
4ing statement :—

“By increase of population, land has generally rather in-
creased in value, especially for building lots; but for farming
purposes it is not considered any more valuable now than ten
or fifteen years ago, and not so valuable as it was fifty years
ago. One reason for that is, we could then hire a good man to
labor for a single day for half a bushel of corn; now the
man will require a bushel and a half for the same labor. Corn
then was worth one dollar per bushel with us,"and is worth no
more now.”

This opinion is somewhat qualified, and probably with justice,
in a communication from another part of the same county, as
follows :—“ The value of farm land to sell, has decreased for
the last ten years; but for cultivation it has increased, the
business of farming paying a larger profit now than ten years
ago.”

The decrease in the estimated value of farm land, is not
confined to the interior of the Commonwealth, but is equally
sreat in many parts of Essex County, situated, as it is, in the
immediate neighborhood of the best markets in the world.

In many towns in the Commonwealth, it is thought by some,
that the profits of farming do not amount to more than one or
two per cent. on the value of the land and stock. In other
cases, they are much higher. The average in the State, as
shown by the returns, is a little over four and a half per cent.

There must be some cause for this singular difference in
profit, and for the low average. If agricultural investments are
not remunerative now, when every thing which the farmer
brings to market commands a ready and high price, it seems
hardly possible that they ever can be under the present man-

SECRETARY’S REPORT. IT

agement. It is true that labor is high, but it is no higher in
proportion, than nearly every product of the farm.

The true view seems to be, that in this occupation, as in
every other, the profit varies with the industry and judement
of the individual engaged in it. Accordinely, we find that
well-managed farms pay much more than the average given
above. As good management becomes more common, this
average will rise. But so long as the exhausting system is
pursued, so long will our farm lands continue to diminish in
value, till at last they will not pay even the labor devoted to
their culture. This is the point to which attention should
especially be directed, for though labor may be high, and the
farmer may thus be exposed to some disadvantages, a course
of proper cultivation would increase the present yield of his
land, while it would effect a permanent improvement in its
character, and he would thus make a double gain. Our best
policy is to manage our land so as to obtain a good crop from
it each year, and at the same time to leave it in better condi-
tion at the end of the year, than it was at the beginning.
The possibility of doing this by liberal treatment, and a
judicious rotation of crops, has been so often proved by experi-
ment, that it cannot now be doubted. That it is not now
generally done, is every where admitted. If, therefore, the
farmer would increase his profits, let him sce to it that he is
constantly increasing the intrinsic value of his land for farm-
ing purposes.

The opinion I have expressed as to the good effects of proper
management, is well supported by the judgment of a practical
farmer of Worcester County, whose long experience and exten-
sive observation entitle his opinion to great weight. In answer
to the eleventh question of the circular as given above, he says:

“Ten per cent. after paying all expenses and labor. My
opinion of the profits of farming is based upon my own. expe-
rience, which I exemplify by the following statement: A farm
in my Vicinity, of one hundred acres, will cost three thousand five
hundred dollars, including buildings; stock and tools, five hun-
dred dollars; in all, four thousand dollars. Such a farm should
be divided into sixty acres pasture, twenty mowing, ten tillage,
and ten woodland. The woodland, by its growth, will supply

13

98 BOARD- OF AGRICULTURE.

the farm fire indefinitely. The pasture will keep eight cows,
two oxen, one horse, and nine young cattle—say, three yearlings,
three two-year olds, and three calves. Three heifers, two
and a half years old, may be sold every autumn, for beef, at
$90. One yoke of oxen will do the work of the farm and
gain twenty-five dollars, and be sold for beef each year.
Hight cows will produce eighteen pounds of milk, daily, for
two hundred and forty days; in all, thirty-four thousand five hun-
dred and sixty pounds of milk, which will make, at twenty-four
pounds of milk to one pound of better, one thousand four hun-
dred and forty pounds of butter; which, at 20 cents per pound,
is $288. The skim-milk—twenty-four pounds of which will
make one pound of pork—will make in pork, one thousand four
hundred and forty, pounds, which, at 62 cents, the average price
for the last ten years, is $95.60. Three calves may be raised,
and five soldat $7; $35. Three three-year old heifers in calf, or
for beef, may be sold annually, $90. Four acres of Indian corn,
two hundred bushels, or twelve hundred pounds, will make
three hundred pounds of pork, allowing four pounds of corn
to make one pound of pork, at 63 cents per pound, is $195.
Three acres of wheat, sixty bushels, at $1.50 per bushel, $90.
Three acres of potatoes, three hundred bushels, about the aver-
age crop for the last ten years, and 50 cents the average price,
$150. Fowls, $20. Profit on oxen, $25. Fruit, $50. Whole
amount produce of farm, $1,036.60.
One man and one woman, will do the work of this farm.

Cost of man, including board, $26 a month, . $312 00
Cost of woman one year, sana board $2.50

a week, ; ? : . 130 00
Taxes, blacksmithing, wear of debi: sue ‘ 21)! 750" OG
Whole expense, ; : , . $492 00
Leaving a balance for area on ae 000, . . 544 60

Outlay of $544.60, or more than 13} per cent.

“'The crops being all consumed on the farm, the land will be
kept good. I have pursued for thirty years a similar course to
this, except I have raised stock instead of keeping dairy cows;
the grain and grass crops being all consumed upon the farm,

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 99

the land is now in better condition than when I commenced.
The reason for the deterioration of our lands is, that we sell
hay, grain and milk; if we do this, we must buy manure; but if
we consume our hay and grain on the farm, and make our milk
into butter and cheese, and sell this with the beef and pork
that our hay, grain, grass and milk will make, our farms will
be kept good, the atmosphere furnishing to the land food for
vegetation equal to the loss by this course of farming.

“Tn the estimate above, I have adopted this course of crop-
ping, because it is the one generally pursued by farmers in this
neighborhood; but if roots were substituted for wheat, the
profits would probably be one hundred dollars more, annually ;
besides, the additional manure furnished by the roots, would
add, in a few years, half a ton an acre, annually, to the hay
crop.”

The same conclusion may be drawn from the estimates of
the comparative expenses and profits of the different crops,
often made by intelligent, practical men, fully capable of form-
ing and stating a correct conclusion.

Compare with the above reliable statement, the following
account of the effects of a different system in one of the most
important towns of Norfolk County, within twelve or fifteen
miles of the market of the metropolis :—

“From the above statement of facts, you will see, Sir, that
the profits of farming are very small; very many of the farmers
say that they are not over one per cent., but I have ventured
to say as high as two or three,—perhaps my estimate is too
high. The selling of milk, has been, and perhaps is now, the
source of the greatest income to the farmer; but the high
price at which labor now is, and hay and grain, will make it
almost ruinous for the farmer to continue to sell at the old
price; during the past year it has been money out of pocket
on our farm; but still, we must keep cows, if we have a farm,
for the manure; and if we have milk we must sell it at some
rate.

“Tn the State of Ohio, milk sells at the same price that it
does with us, and the cost of raising it there is probably not
one-half what itis here. In the State of Illinois, it sells for

100 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

only one cent less per quart, than our price, but the cost of
raising is not one-quarter of what it costs us.”

It is estimated that the net income from the farms of Essex
‘County, does not average more than one hundred dollars each,
annually. Here, also, it is generally admitted that bad man-
agement is the cause of the difficulty, and in many towns in
the county where the land is properly cultivated, farmers have
realized an honorable competency.

The facts which have been presented, and the reflections
suggested by them, seem to furnish a satisfactory answer to the
objection so frequently urged against farming,—that it is not
profitable——and it must be conceded, I think, that the skilful
farmer is as likely to receive an adequate return for his labor,
as any other member of the community. It should be remem-
bered, also, that want of management and skill in any other
calling, mechanical or commercial, subjects the individual con-
cerned, to disappointment and failure.

These are some of the points on which inquiries have been
made, not as embracing all that, was desired, but being as
extended as circumstances made it practicable.

It seems proper, in this connection, to make some reference
to the “ Farmers’ Clubs,” which have already been established
in some parts of the State. Probably they will do more to
satisfy the wants of the thinking minds, which now form a large
class in our community, than any thing else which can be devised.

About twenty of these clubs have been organized in different
towns in the Commonwealth, and the results of their past
exertions show that much may be expected from their future
labors. By their efforts, a greater interest in agricultural
pursuits, and a more earnest spirit of emulation and enterprise
has been aroused, and much useful information has been diffused
in their neighborhood. In most of the towns where they exist,
the inquiries made in the circular given above, were made a
subject of discussion, and committees were appointed to gather
reliable statistics, which were submitted to the club. From
these statistics were drawn up the answers sent to the Secretary,
and thus the most active minds of the whole town were engaged

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 101

in the preparation of the replies. Returns thus carefully and
deliberately prepared, are entitled to as much confidence as if
they had been official.

If there were such a club in every town, composed of enter-
prising and intelligent men, fully conscious of the wants and
deficiencies by which progress in their occupation is impeded,
some system might be arranged by which the most valuable
agricultural statistics from the different parts of the State could
be laid before the Board every year, digested and distributed
for the use of all who would be benefited by them. Such
information is of the utmost importance, if we desire to direct
our industry into the most profitable channels. Probably, if
there were a general law, authorizing the incorporation of such
clubs, under certain conditions, with the right to hold a limited
amount of property, and to draw a small sum from the treasury
after an equal sum had been raised by the club, the income to
be applied to the procuring of such books and such other facili-
ties for gaining information as should be found desirable, a
much larger number of these‘ clubs would be instituted. All
reasonable requisitions on the part of the Commonwealth, in
regard to returns, would gladly be complied with. Thus we
might secure the annual return of all the statistics that are now
obtained only at long intervals, and many more besides. In
this way we might bring to the minds of many, important facts
which cannot now be obtained.

A library of suitable agricultural works, accessible to all,
would, of itself, be of inestimable value to the young. The
slightest circumstance often gives a decided turn to the charac-
ter and whole life of an individual. Elevate farming as a
pursuit—render it attractive by bringing mind to bear upon its
labors, and making it something more than the exertion of mere
brute physical foree—and fewer complaints will be heard from
those who follow it. Then the attention of young men will be
turned to its advantages, and the aversion they now feel will
be succeeded by a love for it. The mind of youth is ever
active, inquiring, and fond of investigation. If its energies are
directed into proper channels, they work for the prosperity of
the State; if not, the individual and the community must alike
suffer for the neglect.

102 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

But, apart from any considerations of advantage to the State,
such associations promote the highest social feelings. The
farmer is necessarily more or less isolated. His pursuits do
not bring those engaged in them into contact with other men»
as many other occupations do. This remark applies with
especial force to the smaller and less populous towns where
the facilities for social improvement, by means of libraries,
lectures, and constant contact of mind with mind, are compara-
tively few. The establishment of Farmers’ Clubs, therefore,
would be doubly advantageous; it would benefit the State by
securing accurate agricultural statistics, and the town or neigh-
borhood, by giving opportunities of social intercourse and
mental cultivation to those who would gladly profit by them.

When the club is once established, and a foundation is laid
for a valuable library, it will grow rapidly; and though there
may, at first, be but few leading minds sufficiently interested to
work for its success, they will soon be found, and vigor and
enthusiasm will be shown in every discussion entered into by
the club. When the mind is once deeply interested in any
subject, it often exerts powers it was not itself conscious of
possessing before, and experience of the good effects of Far-
mers’ Clubs will show with how much advantage this principle
may be applied to agricultural investigations.

These considerations, I think, justify the conclusion that the
importance of such associations can hardly be over-estimated.

The committee of a Farmers’ Club speak of these associ-
ations as follows :—

“Tn conclusion, allow us to call your attention to the means
which, in our opinion, after a practical test of four years, will
be found more efficient than any other for elevating the condi-
tion of the farmers of Massachusetts. We allude to the forma-
tion of Farmers’ Clubs, or town associations. The distinguish-
ing feature of such organizations is the social meetings for the
discussion of subjects connected with agriculture. The great
mass of the working farmers of Massachusetts are comparatively
ignorant men, and one trait is common to very ignorant and
very learned men, viz.: a strong attachment to certain theories
or hobbies, which stand ever in the way of impartial investiga-
tion; and we think that no plan can be devised which so

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 103

effectually roots out error, as bringing these different theories
—formed, as they usually are, upon a very limited observation
of facts—into collision with each other by means of free and
friendly discussion. We have no hesitation in saying that the
result of such discussions among ourselves has been to diffuse
more valuable information through our community than could
possibly have been accomplished in twice the time, if every
farmer among us had carefully read every scientific work ever
published upon agriculture. It is a great mistake to suppose
that the formation of such associations will injure those of the
several counties in the State, and we would do all in our power
to remove the antagonistic feeling which has in some degree
existed between the two forms of organization. That they
must benefit the county societies is, we think, rendered evident
by the increased interest in that of Middlesex County, where
these town societies have for some years been most extensive.”

Some allusion should also be made to the county agricultural
societies, and the manner of awarding prizes in different sections
of the State. These societies are, without doubt, doing a great
and good work for the agriculture of this Commonwealth. Few
things, however, are more difficult, than to arrange a system of
awarding prizes, which is perfect in all its practical details.
There is, therefore, need of much forbearance on the part of
individuals, and great discrimination and care on the part of
committees; and even then, there will be cases in which more
or less dissatisfaction and ill-feeling is excited. For instance,
an honest difference of opinion often arises between the owner
of an animal entered for premium and the members of the
committee, or between the members of the committee them-
selves. Very few, comparatively, have made the points of
perfection in an animal a matter of special and careful study.
Most men form an opinion from the impression received at a
first view, without examining in detail the degree in which the
animal has each of the various points, which, together, would
make it perfect. But the same men would admit that the
general appearance is often deceptive. Of two cows, for exam-
ple, standing side by side, one may be beautiful, and, on the
whole, well formed, the other ill-shaped and unattractive, yet
in those points which constitute a great milker, the latter may

104 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

be much superior to the former. The great majority of spee-
tators would, without a moment’s hesitation, select the most
beautiful as the best, while a careful study of the real points
which make a perfect cow, would show their error. Moreover,
even where the examiner has a standard by which he tests the
animal before him, this standard will of course be different in
different individuals, being formed on different degrees of obser-
vation and study in each. There is, therefore, a necessity for
some general standard, that the grounds of the decision of
the committee may be known. The points, or standard, by
which the merits of the animals offered are to be judged, being
known by all, the committees would have not only a euide for
their decision, but also a protection against the unfair criticisms
by which they are now too frequently assailed.

It might be well for each society to fix some such standard
as could be easily understood, by which its premiums should be
awarded. This might be done in the department just alluded
to, by fixing upon a certain number of points, with the under-
standing that the animal in which these are to be found in the
highest perfection, shall be entitled to the first premium. A
want of a certain number of these points, should exclude the
animal from consideration in the distribution of premiums. Such
a model in the hands of the fommittee, giving all the members
the same means of comparison, would be a great aid to them,
and would make the awarding of premiums comparatively safe,
easy and agreeable, instead of being difficult and embarrassing
as it now is.*

* The following Points of excellence for the different breeds of stock have been
adopted, after careful consideration, by the society of a neighboring State, and are
substantially the same as those adopted by the best judges of stock in England, viz. :

POINTS OF A SHORT-HORN COW.
Pedigree—Showing unbroken descent, on both sides, from known animals, derived
from English herds, as found in the English or American Herd Books, and
without this, an animal cannot compete in this class.

The Head, small lean and bony, tapering to the muzzle, . . : ole:
The Face somewhat long, the fleshy portion of the Nose of a light delicate
color, . 4 ° : : : n 5 . Fb

The Eye is of great significance, and should be prominent, bright, and clear—
‘* prominent,” from an accumulation of *adeps’’ in the back part of its socket,
which indicates a tendency to lay on fat—* bright,”’ as an evidence of a good

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 105

Some local questions have arisen in consequence of the incor-
poration of two or more societies covering the same territorial
limits. These give rise to difficulties which were not originally
foreseen. To many individuals this subject seemed to be of
sufficient importance to call for the consideration of the Board

disposition—* clear,” as a guarantee of the animal’s health; whereas a dull,
sluggish eye belongs to a slow feeder, and a wild, restless eye betrays an un-

quiet, fitful temper, . . A 2 5 ° . . .
The Horns—light in substance and waxy in color, anal symmetrically ut on
the head; the Ear large, thin, with considerable action, : A , ;

The Neck—rather short than long, tapering to the head; clean in the throat,
and full at its base, thus covering and filling out the points of theshoulders, .
The Chest—broad from point to point of the shoulders; deep from the ante-
rior dorsal vertebra to the floor of the sternum, and both round and full just
back of the elbows; sometimes designated by the phrase, ‘thick through the
heart.’’ These are unquestionably the most important points in every animal,
as constitution must depend on their perfect development, and the ample room
thus afforded for the free action of the heart and lungs, ; :
The Brisket, however deep or projecting, must not be contoumndedt with
capacity of chest; for though a very attractive and selling point, it, in reality,
adds nothing to the space within, however it may increase the girth without.
It is in fact nothing more nor less than a muscular adipose substance, attached
to the anterior portion of the sternum, or breast-bone, and thence extending
itself back. This form, however, of the brisket, indicates a disposition to lay on
fat generally throughout the frame, and in this point of view is valuable,
The Shoulder, where weight, as in the Short-horn, is the object, should be
somewhat upright and of good width at the points, with the blade-bone just
sufficiently curved to blend its upper portion smoothly with the crops, °
The Crops must be full and level with the shoulders and back ; and is, per-
haps, one of the most difficult points to breed right in the Short-horn, . :
The Back, Loin and Hips should be broad and wide, forming a straight and
even line from the neck to the setting on of the tail, the hips or hucks round
and well covered, : “ . : . A . . . .
The Rumps laid up high, with plenty of flesh on their axteenitics 5 .
The Pelvis should be large, indicated by the width of the hips (as already
mentioned) and the breadth of the twist, : . : : ° . Fi
The Twist, should be so well filled out in its **seam”’ as to form nearly an
even and wide plain, between the thighs, 5 . . . . . :
The Quarters—long, straight, and well developed downwards, . - -
The Carcass—round; the ribs nearly circular, and extending well back, .
The Flanks—deep, wide, and full in proportion to condition, . . °
The Leg—short, straight, and standing square with the body, . ° .
The Plates of the belly, strong, and thus Panera nearly a straight under

line, cE : é H 5 4 . é
The Tail—flat and broad at its root, tint fine in its by a placed high UDP;
and on a level with the rumps, e 4 2 .

The Carriage of an animal gives ile nit beauty; the rae haute is
square and the step quick ; the head up, . 3 . . c : .

14

14

bo

bo

106 BOARD -OF AGRICULTURE.

of Agriculture. After mature deliberation, the Board passed
unanimously the following vote, that, “In the opinion of this
Board, if it shall be deemed expedient by the Legislature to
grant acts of incorporation for agricultural societies within the

Quality—On this the thriftiness, the feeding properties, and the value of the
animal depends; and upon the touch of this quality rests, in a good measure,
the grazier’s and the butcher’s judgment. If the “touch” be good, some
deficiency of form may be excused; but if it be hard and stiff, nothing can
compensate for so unpromising a feature. In raising the skin from the body,
between the thumb and finger, it should have a soft, flexible and substan-
tial feel, and when beneath the out-spread hand, it should move easily with it,
and under it, as though resting on a soft, elastic, cellular substance; which,
however, becomes firmer as the animal ‘‘ripens.’”’ A thin papery skin is

objectionable, more especially in a cold climate, . 5 A . 15
The Coat should be thick, short and mossy, with longer hate in wate fine,
soft and glossy in summer, . - 4 A . 6 . A oe
The Udder—pliable and thin in its texture, ne well forward, roomy
behind, and the teats stand wide apart, and of conyenient size, ° ° «Uap
100

Points oF THE SHORT-HORN BULL.

As regards the male animal, it is only necessary to remark, that the points
desirable in the female are generally so in the male, but must, of course, be at-
tended by that masculine character which is inseparable from a strong, vigorous
constitution. Even a certain degree of coarseness is admissible, but then it must
be so exclusively of a masculine description as never to be discovered in the females
of his get.

In contra-distinction to the cow, the head of the bull may be shorter, the
frontal-bone broader, and the occipital flat and stronger, that it may receive and
sustain the horn—and this latter may be excused if a little heavy at the base, so
its upward form, its quality and color, beright. Neither is the looseness of the skin,
attached to, and depending from the under jaw, to be deemed other than a feature
of the sex, provided it is not extended beyond the bone, but leaves the gullet
and throat clean and free from dewlap.

The upper portion of the neck should be full and muscular, for it is an indication
of strength, power and constitution. The spine should be strong, the bones of the
loin long and broad, and the whole muscular system wide and thoroughly developed
over the entire frame.

NORTH DEVONS.

Purity of Blood, as traced back satisfactorily to importations of both dam and
sire, from known English breeders, or as found in the lately established Herd
Book, for North Devons, and without this, an animal can not compete in this
class.

The Head should be small lean and bony; the forehead wide, flat, or from a
fullness of the frontal bone over the eyes, somewhat dishing ; the face straight ;

the muzzle fine; the nostrils open; the lips thin and rather flat, . ° .. A
The Nose of a light delicate orange color, . . . . . 6 baa:
The Eye should be bright, prominent, and clear, but mild and gentle in its

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 107

limits of existing societies, the geographical limits of such
societies should be distinctly defined, so that no two societies
hereafter to be entitled to the bounty of the State shall cover

the same territory.”

expression, as indicative of that spirited, but tractable disposition so necessary
to cattle that must bear the yoke; a beautiful orange-colored ring should in-

yariably surround the eye, . ° - : ° . ° : °
The Ear—thin: of a rich orange-color within, of medium size, with a dalek
and ready movement, expressive of attention, - . < ° . .

The Horns—light, tapering, of a waxy color toward the extremity, and gaily
as well as symmetrically placed on the head; the occipital bone, narrow, thus

bringing the base of the horns nearer together, : c . “ ¢ 5
The Neck of medium length, somewhat light in substance, very clean, and
well set up on the shoulder, . 3 : . . . -

The Chest—deep and round, carrying its ities wl back of the teas
thus affording, by the aid of a springing rib, abundant interna! room for the
action of the thoracic viscera, the heart and lungs, and that too, without an
extreme width forward, and between the points of the shoulders, which might
interfere with the action of the animal, . ° : . ° . .

The Briskee—It being assumed that it adds nothing to the internal capacity of
the chest, must not overload the breast, but be sufficiently developed to
guarantee a feeding property, attended with a full proportion of fatty secre-
tion, ¢ : C c c - ° c - ° :° . e

The Shoulder is, in this breed, a very ig eagatife and important point, and
should in a degree approximate in form to that of the horse. It should take a
more sloping position than is found in most other breeds, with its points less
projecting, and angular, and the blade bone more curved, thus blending with

and forming a fine wither, rising a little above the level line of the back, -
The Crops full and even, forming a true line with the somewhat rising
shoulder, and level back, without either drop or hollow, : : ' .
Back, Loin, and Hips, broad and wide, running on a level with the setting
on of the tail, : - ; : 2 : : : r - = 2
The Rumps—lying broad apart, high, and well covered, . . 3
The Pelwis—wide, F e : ‘ : ; 3 5 ; - :
The Twist—full and broad, . : . . . > : .

The Quarters long and thoroughly filled up between ‘tie hooks, or hip bones,
and the rumps, with a good muscular development down the thigh to the
hocks, . = a 5 = C -

The nie Mod evatsi'y ie full and ‘atenlonr' in proportion to contin A

The Legs not too short, and standing as square, and straight behind, as may
be compatible with activity. The bone quite small below the hock and knee;
the sinews large and clean, with the fore-arm well developed, . . .

The Carcass round and straight ; its posterior ribs almost circular, extending
well back, and springing nearly horizontally from the vertebra, giving, in fact,

much greater capacity than would at first appear, . : - : . .
The Tail, at its junction, level with the back, long, very slender in its cord,
and finishing with a tassel of white hair, ° 5 : 4 ; ° .

Lhe Color, in its shades and degrees, is more or less governed by fashion ; but

14

wh on ©

108 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

The want of reliable and accurate experiments in agriculture
is now very generally felt, and it has been the desire of the
Board to have such conveniences as would enable them to
conduct a series of experiments in such a manner as to secure

in the Devon is always red. Formerly a rich blood-red was the favorite color,

and a test of purity; and now a somewhat lighter color is in vogue, approach-

* ing rather nearer to that of the South Devon, which is a larger, coarser, stronger

animal. In all cases the color grows lighter round the muzzle, while a dark

mahogany color, verging almost to a black, and growing yet darker about the

head, always was a very questionable color for a true North Devon, more

especially when accompanied by 2 dark nose, . ‘ ‘ ° nel
The Hair should be short, thick, and fine; and if showin on its surface a

fine curl, or ripple, it looks richer in color, and issuppcsed to indicate a hardier

and more thrifty animal, : . . . . . . . . 1
The Udder should be such as will afford the best promise of capacity aad
product, ‘ . : : : . : - : é : a had

The Car ee Devons haying, from their excellence in the yoke, another
destiny besides that of the butcher’s block, it is all important that the animal’s
carriage should indicate as much; but to obtain this, something of the heayy,
inert, squarely moulded frame of the merely beefing animal must be relin-
quished for a lighter and more active frame, . . . : . . ks

Quality—On this the thriftiness, the feeding properties, and the value of the
animal depends; and upon the touch of this quality rests, in a good measure,
the grazier’s and the butcher’s judgment. If the ‘‘touch’”’ be good, some
deficiency of form may be excused; but if it be hard and stiff, nothing can
compensate for so unpromising a feature. In raising the skin from the body,
between the thumb and the finger, it should have a soft, flexible and substantial
feel, and when beneath the out-spread hand, it should move easily with it, and
under it as though resting on a soft, elastic, cellular substance; which, how-
ever, becomes firmer as the animal “ripens.’’ A thin papery skin is objection-
able, more especially in a cold climate, . > ‘ . . . . ls

Points oF THE Drvyon Butt.

As regards the male animal, it is only necessary to remark, that the points
desirable in the female are generally so in the male, but must, of course, be at-
tended by that masculine character which is inseparable from a strong, vigorous
constitution. Even a certain degree of coarseness is admissible, but then it must
be so exclusively of a masculine description as never to be discovered in the females
of his get.

In contra-distinction to the cows, the head of the bull may be shorter, the
frontal-bone broader, and the occipital flat and stronger, that it may receive and
sustain the horn—and this latter may be excused if a little heavy at the base, so its
upward form, its quality and color, be right. Neither is the looseness of the skin,
attached to, and depending from the under jaw, to be deemed other than a feature
of the sex, provided it is not extended beyond the bone, but leaves the gulletrand
throat clean and free from dewlap.

The upper portion of the neck should be full and muscular, for it is an indication

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 109

the confidence of the community. Those made by individuals
in various parts of the State have been very valuable to the
experimenters, and in some cases very costly, but as long as
there is no concert of action, our ignorance and confusion of

of strength, power and constitution. The spine should be strong, the bones of the
loin, long and broad, and the whole muscular system wide and thoroughly devel-

oped over the entire frame.

HEREFORDS.

Purity of Blood, as traced back to the satisfaction of committees, to imported
blood, on both sides, from some known English breeder, or as found in Eyton’s

Hereford Herd Book.
The Head—moderately small, with a good width of forehead, tapering to the

muzzle; the cheek-bone rather deep, but clean inthe jaw, . . - .
The Nose, light in its color, and the whole head free from fleshiness, .
The Eye full, mild, and cheerful in its expression, : - 3 -
The Ear of medium size, . - : - : - - 5 : :
The Horns—light and tapering, long and spreading, with an outward and

upward turn, giving a gay and lofty expression to the whole head, . ‘

The Neck—of a medium length; full in its junction with the shoulders,
spreading well over the shoulder points and tapering finely to the head,

The Chest—broad, round, and deep; its floor running well back of the
elbows, which, with a springing fore-rib, gives great interior capacity to this all
important portion of the body, . . ° . . : .

The Brisket—when in flesh, largely developed, Seukendiie ete between the
legs, and deep, by covering the anterior portion of the sternum, or breast bone,
but never interfering with the action of the animal when in working condition,

The Shoulder—lying snugly and closely in towards the top and spreading
towards the points ; the blade sloping somewhat back, and running pretty well
up into the withers, which by rising a very trifle above the level line of the
back, gives to the ox a very upstanding, and beautiful fore-end. The whole
shoulder well clothed with muscle, : ‘ : 4 .

The Crops—filling all up evenly behind the shoes bid het them
smoothly with the muscles of the back, . : . : . . : .

The Back, loin and hips, should be broad, wide and level, : - 3

The Rumps should lie nearly, or quite level with the back, and their cover-
ing should be abundant, mellow, loose, and freely moving under the hand,
thus showing great aptitude to fatten, . : : : - : .

The Pelvis—roomy ; indicated by wide hips, as already mentioned, sail the
space between the rumps, which should stand well apart, giving a general
breadth to the posterior portion of the animal, ’ . :

The Twist, broad and full, extending well down on each side of the thigh,
with corresponding width—a broad twist is a good indication of a butcher’s
animal, ; : ° : . > : ‘ - : : :

The Hind Quar ters—large and thoroughly aise eloped in its upper and more
valuable portions, as beef. The thigh gradually tapering to the hock but
muscular, . . : . . : . . . . . :

ePbwby Ww

14

110 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

ideas respecting the many questions still remaining to be
answered, in agricultural science, will continue. It is often the
case that an experiment is tried at the recommendation of some
agricultural journal, or some writer, or friend of improvement,

The Carcass—round throughout; full and capacious, with the under line of
the belly level, or nearly so, . . : . . ° : . : stage
The Flank full and wide, . : : 5 B A A 5 ‘ > hale
The Legs—straight, upright; firmly placed to support the superincumbent
weight; a strong back sinew, but by no means a large, coarse, cannon bone,. 3
The Plates of the belly strong, and thus preserving nearly a straight under
line, F é : : :

iv)

The Tail—large and full at its point of attachment, but fine inits chord, .
The Carriage—prompt, resolute, and cheerful ; and in the ox, gay andlively, 3
The Hair—thick, close and furry, and if accompanied with a long growth,

and a disposition to curl moderately, is more in estimation, but that which has

bo

a harsh and wiry feel is objectionable, . : . : . . .
The Udder should be such as will afford the best promise of aa and
product, : . - 5 ° 5 . . 5 re |

Color—Reds or rich browns, oftentimes very darks with a white or pretics
led” face, are now the colors, and marking of the Herefords, though gray
Herefords or cream-colored, are not uncommon, . : 5 3 Vil

Quality—On this the thriftiness, the feeding properties, and the waite of the
animal depends; and upon the touch of this quality rests, in a good measure,
the grazier’s and the butcher’s judgment. Ifthe ‘*touch” be good, some de-
ficiency of form may be excused; but if it be hard and stiff, nothing can com-
pensate for so unpromising a feature. In raising the skin from the body,
between the thumb and finger, it should have a soft, flexible and substantial
feel, and when beneath the out-spread hand, it should move easily with it, and
under it, as though resting on a soft, elastic, cellular substance; which, how-
ever, becomes firmer as the animal ‘‘ripens.’’ A thin papery skin is objection-
able, more especially in acold climate, . . ; : . : . Pane Li:

Pornts oF THE Hererorp Butt.

As regards the male animal, it is only necessary to remark, that the points de-
sirable in the female are generally so in the male, but must, of course be attended
by that masculine character which is inseparable from a strong, vigorous constitution.
Even a certain degree of coarseness is admissible, but then it must be so exclusively
of a masculine description as never to be discovered in the females of his get.

In contra-distinction to the cows, the head of the bull may be shorter, the
frontal-bone broader, and the occipital flat and stronger, that it may receive and
sustain the horn—and this latter may be excused if a little heavy at the base, so its
upward form, its quality and color be right. Neither is the looseness of the skin,
attached to, and depending from the under jaw, to be deemed other than a feature
of the sex, provided it is not extended beyond the bone, but leaves the gullet and
throat clean and free from dewlap.

The upper portion of the neck should be full and muscular, for it is an indication
of strength, power and constitution, The spine should be strong, the bones of the

SECRETARY’S REPORT.

111

and when the experimenter finds the result does not answer
his expectations, he is ready to ery out, “the old way is best;
leave me to follow in the tracks of my fathers.” Thus the
_ farmer is often advised to plough deep, and pulverize the soil

loin, long and broad, and the whole muscular system wide and thoroughly deyel-

oped over the entire frame.

AYRSHIRES.

Purity of Blood, as traced back to importations of both dam and sire, under such

evidence as will satisfy committees.
The Head, as in other breeds, small; the face long and narrow; the muzzle

and nose yariable, 4 “ ' . ; : : 5 - -
The Eye placid and not Meikingly large, . . . . . . .
The Ear of full size, and of an orange color within, . : : :
The Horns small, tapering, with an outward and upward turn, and net on
wide apart; the face somewhat dishing, : 5 . : . c
The Neck of medium length, clean in the throat, very light divongnode and
tapering tothe head, . - . . ° . . . . :
The Shoulders lying snugly to ie body, thin at their top, small at their
points, not long in the blade, nor loaded with muscle, . . 5 5

The Chest must retain sufficient width and roundness to insure constitution.
The lightness of the fore-quarter, and the “‘ wedge shape”’ of the animal from
the hind-quarter forward, arising more from a small, flat and thin shoulder,

than from any undue narrowness of the chest, : - : : . ;
The Crops easily blend in with so thin a shoulder, and prevent all hollow-
ness behind, : - - c ¢ : - : é - :
The Brisket not over-loading the fore-end, but light, c
The Back should be straight, and the loin wide, the hips rather high ain
wellspread, . : : 6 - - : . : :
The Pelvis roomy, causing a ied breadth at what is ‘eerie the «thurl, i
or ‘‘round-bone,”’ and between the points of the rumps, . : .

The Quarters long, tolerably muscular, and full in their upper poeta) but
moulding into the thighs below, which should havea degree of flatness, afford-
ing thus more space for afull udder. The flank well let down, but not heavy,

The Ribs, behind, springing out very round and full, affording space for a
large udder, which by Ayrshire breeders is considered very essential to secure
the milking property; the whole carcass thus acquiring increased volume to-
wards its posterior portion, . : . F - . . . . .

The Rumps nearly level with the back projecting but little, : : :

The Tail thin in its cord, of full length, light in its hair, and set somewhat
farther into the back than would be admissible with some other breeds, :

The Legs delicate and fine in the bone, inclining to be short, and well knit
together at the joints, . : . E : ‘ . : . . -

The Udder in this breed is of more especial importance, as the Ayrshires have
been bred almost exclusively with reference to their milking properties. The
great feature of the udder should be capacity, without being fleshy. It should
be carried squarely and broadly forward, and show itself largely behind. As
it rises upward it should not mingle too immediately with the muscle of the

112 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

thoroughly. He drives down the plough, throws up the sub-
soil, and tries it for one season. The piece so treated is then
planted, and by its side another, ploughed, perhaps, but five or
six inches deep. The latter may bear the better crop, and the

thighs, but continue to preserve its own peculiar texture of skin—thin, delicate

and ample in its folds. The teats should stand wide apart, and be lengthy, but

not large and coarse, . 5 : . A . 5 ° . A oe
The Handling will show the skin to be of medium thickness only, moving

freely under the hand and evincing a readiness in the animal to take on flesh,

when a drain on the constitution is no longer made by the milkpail, . .
The Hair soft and thick, in the phraseology of the country, woolly, . ote:
Color, varies—a dark red—a rich brown—a liver color, or mahogany, run-

ning into almost a black ; those very much broken and spotty at the edges on

a white ground are the favorite colors at the present time. The light yellow

is, however, a color; sometimes found on very good cows, but these pale colors

are objected to from an impression that such belong to animals of less constitu-

for)

tion, : : : : 5 5 = A 4 A : j
Carriage should be light, active, and even gay; this latter appearance is

much promoted by the upward turn of the horn, . ° : . : a!

Points oF THE AYRSHIRE BuLu.

As regards the male animal, it is only necessary to remark, that the points
desirable in the female are generally so in the male, but must, of course, be attended
by that masculine character which is inseparable from a strong, vigorous constitu-
tion. Even acertain degree of coarseness is admissible, but then it must be so
exclusively of a masculine description as never to be discovered in the females of
his get.

In contra-distinction to the cows, the head of the bull may be shorter, the fron-
tal-bone broader, and the occipital flat and stronger, that it may receive and sustain
the horn—and this latter may be excused if a little heavy at the base, so its upward
form, its quality and color beright. Neither is the looseness of the skin, attached
to, and depending from the under jaw, to be deemed other than a feature of the
sex, provided it is not extended beyond the bone, but leaves the gullet and throat
clean and free from dewlap.

The upper portion of the neck should be full and muscular, for it is an indication
of strength, power and constitution. The spine should be strong, the bones of
the loin long and broad, and the whole muscular system wide and thoroughly
developed over the entire frame.

For the Jersey, or Alderney cows, the following scale of points has been estab-
lished by the society in the Island of Jersey.

ScaLe or Pornts FoR Cows anp HEIrers.
I, Breed on male and female sides, reputed for producing rich and yellow

butter, 5 ‘ 4 : “ 5 4 : ; : : apd
II. Head small, fine and tapering; eye full and lively, muzzle fine, and en-

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 113

trial is thought to justify the conclusion that it is best to go on
and let the subsoil alone.

We are too apt to forget that a single experiment does not
settle or unsettle a law of the natural world. If one fails, it

circled with white ; horns polished and a little crumpled, tipped with black ;

ears small, of an orange color within, . ; ¢ - 7 2 C <p ae
Ill. Back straight from the withers to the setting on of the tail; chest deep,
and nearly on a line with the belly, . 5 . . . . - 4

IV. Hide thin, movable, but not too loose, well covered with fine soft hair, 2

Y. Barrel-hooped and deep, well-ribbed home, haying but little space be-
tween the ribs and hips; tail fine, hanging two inches below the hock, . aii 4

VI. Fore legs straight and fine, thighs full and long, close together when
viewed from behind ; hind legs short, bones rather fine ; hoof small; hind legs

not to cross in walking, : : oh
VII. Udder full, well up pele ‘eats ee and Searele ee ee
wide apart; milk veins large and swelling, . : . . ° ° . 4
VIII. Growth, a 5 : ah pais j ; ; F d mrad va |
IX. General appearance, . . . - - . 5 c : ahh ae
Perfection forCows, . . . 5 . . . : - 30

Two points shall be deducted from the number required for perfection on heifers,
as their udder and milk veins cannot be fully developed. A heifer will therefore
be considered perfect at twenty-eight points.

No prize will be awarded to cows or heifers having less than twenty-one points.

ScaLEe oF Points For Jersey Butts.

I. Purity of breed on male and female sides, reputed for having produced

rich and yellow butter, : 4
Il. Head fine and tapering, cheek small, ‘auzzle fine and encircled with

white, nostrils high and open, horns polished, crumpled, not too thick at the
base, and tapering, tipped with black; ears small, of an orange color within,
eye full and lively, 4 : : Eee:
Ill. Neck fine, and lightly pied on the shigealdees, : muest apace eee
hooped and deep, well-ribbed home to the hips, . ( “ “
IV. Back straight from the withers to the setting on of the tail, at right
angles to the tail. Tail fine, hanging two inches below the hock, . F spain
V. Hide thin and moyable, mellow, well covered with soft and fine hair, 3
VI. Fore arm large and powerful, legs short and straight, swelling and full
above the knee, and fine below it, E - 4 : a , ala eae
VII. Hind quarters, from the huckle to the point of the rump, long and
well filled up; the legs not to cross behind in walking, . 4 Sh peaks - 2
VIII. Growth, . . - “ is : 4 P c e ata I
IX. General appearance, . _ ; : 4 ° ° - pee

os

Perfection, . 5 5 ‘ p é : 4 : = . 28
No prize shall be awarded to a bull hatte less than twenty points.

But the majority of animals offered for prizes at our exhibitions is of no known
breed, and it is a matter of no small difficulty to know on what principle to award

15

114 BOARD- OF AGRICULTURE.

should be carefully repeated, on a small scale, if necessary, and
so on till, by a series of careful trials, we obtain something
reliable enough to enable us to form a judgment. |

We should remember, also, that the results of an experiment
made in one locality, or on one kind of soil, will be very differ-
ent from those of the same experiment under other circum-
stances. Theories founded on a limited range of observation
cannot be expected to be generally applicable.

prizes. It is, however, important that there should be some known standard for
these animals, as well as for others.

The following scale of Points is offered with much diffidence, in the hope that it
may aid, at least, in forming some system. If societies or committees would adopt
some such known standard, to be followed in similar cases, it would be found, it is
thought, of essential service :-—

Scatn or Points ror Cows anp Hrirers ror THE Darry.

I. Head small, lean and tapering, eye full, lively ard mild, ears small
orange within, horns smail, . 3 3 5 - = . : ay 6
It. Back straight, from withers to root of tt he tail. Brisket full, chest deep,
and nearly on a line with the belly. (The shoulders sometimes rise loosely

above the back bone, many good milkers have this defect,) . : . ot
Til. Skin moderately thick, but mellow; hair soft to the touch and fine.

The skin should incline to yellow, and be soft, . 5 ew,
IV. Barrel-hooped, broad and deep, surloin broad, tail fapering from the

rump downwards, : : 5 5 5 : : . : Pe 3
V. Legs straight, delicate andl fine boned, : . - : . a

Vi. Apparent health, : : c - E : . . “ ere
VII. Udder coming broadly and squarely forward, large and full behind,
and rising up the thighs, preserving its distinct character of skin, soft, delicate
and loose folds, with teats of medium length, standing well apart, . c ko
VIII. The eseutcheon is represented by the upward growing hair, which
commencing on the back side and near the lower part of the udder, and on the
inside of the hocks, extends upwards towards the first touch or tip of the rump,
and also upwards and outwards to the outer edge of the thigh. The better marks
are those which extend farthest out upon the thighs, other things being equal.
Accompanying these best marks, there are also two spots or rounds of down-
ward growing hair, one on each side of the udder, near the hinder teats. There
are also many other particulars connected with different escutcheons, the com-
parative value of which can only be understood by a reference to the small
treatise upon the subject, by M. Guénon, which is easily accessible to all, ina
translation, a second edition of which has been lately published.
As milk is the chief object with most who keep milch cows, the escutcheon
which indicates this in the highest degree should be entitled to, . . ren tey

Points of perfection, . 5 ; F - 3 . ; A - 380
No animal should obtain a premium which has less than twenty.
The points desirable in the bull are, in the main the same, marked, howeyer, by
more masculine character.

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 115

This consideration has too often been overlooked, and unde-
served discredit has thus been thrown on projects and theories
good in themselves, but which have not produced the anticipated
effect, merely because they were applied to circumstances and
situations to which they were in no way adapted. Because an
experiment fails on a soil entirely unlike that where it was first
made and succeeded, we should not infer that he who first tried
it was ignorant, or gave a false account of his experience; yet
this hasty judgment is not uncommon. On the other hand, both
writers and experimenters would do well to remember, what
they now often forget, that by the confident assertion of theories
purporting to be of universal application, they will inevitably
lesson their own influence, while they retard the progress of
agriculture. The mode of treatment which would be adyanta-
geous and profitable in Berkshire, may be expensive and ruinous
in Barnstable. The crops and general husbandry best adapted
to one situation may be wholly unsuited to another; the ideas
of farming, the facilities for obtaining labor, and even the
animals, differ in different localities.

It has been thought that if a tract of land sufficiently large,
and with such a variety of soils as would make it convenient
for carrying on experiments, could be provided, the Board of
Agriculture would be able to do something by which these evils
might be gradually remedied, and the wants of the farming
community supplied. No provision has, as yet, been made to
enable the Board to direct specfal attention to this subject.

Massachusetts was one of the first governments, if not the
first, in this country, which attempted to aid the progress of
agriculture by legislative enactments. As early as 1630, her
bounty began in premiums offered for the raising of horses,
cows, swine and goats, for the promotion of agriculture.
During the last thirty years, this bounty has been increasing
and always liberal. Other States have not been slow to imi-
tate or rival her in generous endeavors to promote the success
of an interest on which the prosperity and happiness of their
people so largely depend.

No means are at hand showing the comparative encourage-
ment afforded to agriculture by the different States.

The amount paid, or to be paid, from the treasury of this

116 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

Commonwealth for the past year, to be distributed in prizes by
the various Societies, is no less than $8,782.

The aggregate amount of the permanent fund of the societies is - $92,816 54

“ “ ‘of all the property of the societies is ; * 109,911 10
“ “ “© of income of fund, a : c - : 4,325 03
“ “ “received from new members and donations, . 6,376 50
“ “ «of receipts by the societies for the year, . - 28,465 82
“ “ «of premiums and gratuities distributed, 8,489 11
“ “« ‘© of disbursements for the year, - F > 20,014 87,
Of the premiums distributed, there were paid on farms and various
farm improvements, . A ; : . . . . . 1,574 00

For live stock of all kinds, ns 8 - 3 : - . ‘ 4,451 37
« farm products of all kinds, . . : . . . . 2,133 18
The number of persons who received prizes and gratuities was . : 2,095

A more detailed statement of the manner in which these
disbursements have been made, will be found in the Appendix
to this Report, to which reference is respectfully made.

This bounty, through the premiums of the county societies,
unquestionably does much good. But the meetings of a county
society must necessarily be rare, and even if they were more
frequent, they could hardly do all that is required. Other
means of improvement are necessary. It is a very common
remark, and one whose truth is generally admitted, that the
education most in keeping with the spirit of the age, is that
which makes one most competent to perform the duties of his
profession. The young man who proposes to engage in any
other occupation which demands the exercise of any degree of
scientific knowledge, devotes some of the best years of his life
to a laborious preparation. In all the different departments,
except that of agriculture, ample facilities are found for the pro-
fessional education of the young. In many cases, they have been
furnished by the generosity of private individuals. In others,
individuals have found it profitable to supply them to those
who deserved them, and were willing to pay for them. There
seems to be no reason why the young farmer should not have
equal facilities for perfecting himself in his occupation. But
none of the causes we have mentioned as in operation in other
departments, have given him the means.

The establishment of Farmers’ Institutes, it is thought,
would, to some extent, at least, supply these wants. The Board
of Agriculture have no means in their power to enable them to

SECRETARY’S REPORT. 1B th |

take any steps towards the establishment of these Institutes.
It is desirable that some provision should be made at an early
day with reference to this object.

Justice to myself requires me to say, that the duties of the
Secretary are too arduous to be performed by a single person.
During a part of the past year, I have found it necessary to
employ an assistant at my own expense.

These duties, entered upon with great diffidence, and with a
knowledge of the embarrassments arising from their manifold
and responsible nature, and the undefined wants and unlimited
expectations of many, are still constantly increasing. I must
accordingly respectfully ask that provision be made for a per-
manent clerk, as soon as suitable office accommodations can be
furnished.

In the preceding pages, I have endeavored to present as
complete a view of the past and present condition of the agri-
culture of the Commonwealth, as the facts at my command
made practicable ; noticing, in the course of the statement, such
wants as seemed to me to call for prompt action for their
removal. On the whole, we have evidence of a gratifying
progress in our agriculture, though it is still embarrassed by
many deficiencies. More attention is paid to farming now than
formerly. Intelligent cultivators are more numerous, and more
successful, and there seems to be every reason to believe that
the progress which has begun will continue, until at last the
cultivation of the soil will take its proper rank among the
various occupations in which the inhabitants of the State are
engaged. That this result may be speedily arrived at, must be
the earnest wish of all who have at heart the true interests of
the Commonwealth.

CHARLES L. FLINT,
Secretary of the Board of Agriculture.

Boston, January 23d, 1854.

; da fi

Me

‘ety nate

Ae
+;

} « ‘
bi4 fi
f 3
f i
aa

*

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

APPOINTED TO VISIT THB

Cahihitions of the Agrienltucal Surtees,

. {ow ad eden
bi hire? wg wy :

LY tl

vr load

i oe monitor he if fis 4
na | hyavteivion wee
My nahrepert iy! nx
sano fs a

et,

q iS ‘e
| ey)

KO ie sadaee rad
Ho 1 ean
kettle
} £ tH (pai ve 1 hull

P P :
“8h D> Ok A) Oe, ae

ine sb sith ui zo }

Sa on iene al

te, Gat Brie Na
Mle Th aaa three
wie TS Ae sah tat ag
fie Jia 4 SaRae |
a ot a he ot
: ° ? ; pA i
tinst 1 y rr. ah

al weg

ee

eo)
as wal ‘Ay
| moe
cp oirial- heodenpy,
| | pulaclt ale that ae
ads iin iy yf
41 « ,, bus
Siw compe

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES. 121

ESSEX SOCIETY.

It was my duty, as well as my privilege as a member of this
Board, to be present at the exhibition by the society in the
County of Essex on the 28th and 29th of September.

I will, therefore, briefly as I may, make mention of such
things as occurred to my mind upon that occasion.

The high reputation attained by this society had awakened
great expectations. Very few societies in the State have done
more to produce an interest in agriculture.

Much of this spirit still remains, and some of those who have
served laboriously for thirty years or more, are still in the
harness, while others have stepped aside to make room for
those more energetic and efficient.

No want of ardor in the cause is chargeable upon Essex. She
has certainly been most fortunate in raising a crop of men as
well as mind—peculiarly adapted and most eminently qualified
to advance the cause of agriculture. In past times she had her
Pickerings and Colman, who have left their mark, and shall
not the present strong friends of this time honored art in old
Essex, as well as all parts of our country, be diligent and strong
in placing one stone firmly on the other until a monument is
completed worthy of the memory of these distinguished agri-
culturists? They were amongst the first in this country to
suggest openlysthat agriculture was a science, and the last not
to plough by reason of the cold.

The inclemency of the first day threw a damper over all the
proceedings, and greatly curtailed the exhibition. Very little
came in from the south part of the county, for this reason, as
I was assured.

Essex is not a stock growing county; a large part of their
animals are obtained from Maine, New Hampshire, and from
Vermont—farmers thinking it more profitable to purchase
young animals than to rear them, and in consequence of this
conclusion, premiums are offered for animals of superior merits,
without regard to their having been raised within the county
or State. And it would seem that they do not claim credit for

16

122 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

rearing animals or improving their stock in this way. Whether
they are right in this, is matter for serious consideration. My
own impression is that the State bounty, so liberally offered to
each society, was originally intended to be offered on stock of
our own rearing within the State, if not the county in which it
is offered. No animal can take a premium in Worcester County
unless it be wholly the product of the county. This may be
selfish; but it is the only way that a valuable race of animals
can be perpetuated or improved, tomy knowledge. This buying
foreign stock from a foreign state has undoubtedly been induced
by the presumed enhanced profits of supplying our markets
with fresh milk instead of manufacturing it into butter, and the
consequence is a large portion of our phosphates go to market
never to be returned, in shape of what would be skimmed milk
for rearing our best young calves or feeding swine. My own
conclusion is, that this practice of offering premiums for other
than stock of our rearing, does not have a tendency to
promote the object our government had in view. It was stated
at the dinner table by Mr. Lawson, I think, of Lowell, that he
had imported two cows recently from the Isle of Jersey, of pure
blood, and by repeated trials had obtained one pound of butter
from four quarts of milk from the one he kept, and his neighbor
who owned the other, had succeeded as often in making one
pound and one ounce from the same quantity of milk. This
statement undoubtedly is correct, as no one has ever contra-
dicted it to my knowledge. Be it so; whilst from the best
information that I can obtain, as an average of all the mongrel
or accidental cows in the State, it takes eleven quarts of milk
for a pound of butter. If we take the last census as evidence,
we find the value of live stock in the United States to be far
greater than all the manufacturing and mercantile interest put
together. Yet who has ever heard of a legislature, either state
or national, spending a breath of talk, or bestowing a thought on
the breeding and rearing of a pure race of cattle that will give
us certain results? The attention of the Board of Agriculture
is most earnestly, though respectfully, called to this subject.
And I am free to confess that, in my opinion, the State’s bounty
is not doing its intended work in many of the societies to
which it is so liberally bestowed.

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES. 123

There were some good specimens of working oxen present,
but nothing like what should have been exhibited. We greatly
err if many teams in the county cannot be found which would
present a better show.

The fat cattle, sixteen in number, were decidedly good.

Of horses, there were some very good animals on the ground,
which did credit to the show. May not this branch of industry,
also, be encouraged with profit in nearly all the counties in
the State.

Of the operations in the ploughing field I can speak favorably
without qualification. About forty teams were on the ground,
of every variety. It is impossible to look upon such a per-
formance without deriving instruction. The well-earned repu-
tation of the county was fully sustained in this department.

Deep ploughing and thorough pulverization seem to be
favorite ideas in Essex. These, they say, are the substratum
of their superior crops. The hall in which were exhibited all
articles of manufacture, products of the field and the garden,
presented a fine, as well as creditable display.

The exhibition of swine and poultry was very satisfactory,
and in most instances was well calculated to do credit to the
individual contributors as well as to the society.

At the dinner table, as well as at the church, where the
Address was delivered, we can say that nothing was lacking
either in the way of food for body or mind. About five hundred
sat down to a well-spread table, and I was happy to notice the
harmony and good feeling which prevailed. Many distinguished
friends of agriculture from abroad were present, and by invita-
tion from Col. Newell, the president of the society, many
short, though excellent as well as profitable, remarks and
suvvestions were made, mostly in discussing the merits of
building up a race of pure blood cattle for the growing wants
of our State. This was as it should be, and we came away
from old Essex feeling that we had spent a day profitably in
her courts.

Harvey DopeGe.

124 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

ot

MIDDLESEX SOCIETY.

In compliance with the request of the State Board of Agri-
culture, the undersigned visited the Middlesex County Cattle
Show, held at Concord on the 4th and 5th of October, 1853,
it being their fifty-ninth anniversary. I arrived at Concord on
the evening of the 4th, and found the society assembled in the
Court House, consulting together for the public good, and
arranging for the principal day of exhibition on the 5th. This
day was as fine as could be desired; early in the morning there
was ageneral movement of ladies and gentlemen, young and old,
together with cattle, teams, and every imaginable thing that
could move, or be moved, coming from every point of the
compass, to the society’s newly purchased exhibition ground
and enclosure. This lot contains about five acres, and
has been selected with much good taste and judgement; it is
just far enough out from the village to give it a rural quietness.
On it has been placed a building one hundred feet long by forty
wide; the lot has been enclosed by a secure fence, and in this
enclosure have been erected permanent pens for the cattle,
sheep, swine and horses, and platforms for the poultry. A well
has been dug, furnished with a pump, and posts have been put in
the ground through which ropes are put, to protect the trial of
oxen, and spading ground from the crowd. The building has
been furnished with tables, table cloths, fruit dishes, and all that
could be desired to accommodate exhibitors. At the entrance
gate, has been erected a porter’s lodge, for the transaction of
business, and to receive the fee of entrance, a charge of twelve
and a half cents, which fee must create quite a revenue for the
society. The gross outlay for all these fixtures, including land,
&e., is about $2,200. Nearly all this amount has been collect-
ed by the free services of Hon. Joseph T. Buckingham. <A
small surplus was in the treasury, and a small amount remains
to be collected. In all this outlay, the society have scrupulously
retained their original invested capital of three thousand dol-
lars, entire. Your committee have deemed it advisable to be
particular on this point, as they deem the doings of this so-

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES. 125

ciety of importance enough to be imitated, as far as practicable,
by all the county societies, which are not now provided for.

The exhibition of fruits, was fine; Middlesex County has long
been known for its fine growth of vegetables; it was well rep-
resented at this show. The exhibition of domestic manufac-
tures, was in fine taste. The exhibition of butter, cheese, and
bread, was a warrantee that the ladies had exercised their
good judgment, and their “ rights,” in this department.

In the cattle pens, were to be found Durhams, Devons,
Ayrshires, and Alderneys, and fine native stock. In the smaller
pens were to be seen as fine swine as could be found anywhere
else; in fact, there was ample evidence that Middlesex,—one of
the largest, most populous, and wealthy counties in the Com-
monwealthmeant to lead in breeding from the best stock
known, whether of horses, cows, working oxen, swine, or poul-
try, that could be found in this country. The land in the
enclosure is welladapted for the trial of working oxen. Some
of the teams were patterns of correctness, in the quiet manner
in which the work was done. The ploughing was done in the
usual manner. The show of fine horses and oxen on such occa-
sions, is always exhilarating; the fine horse teams, the double
and single ox teams, many of them doing their work in a man-
ner worthy of all praise. A spading match was held in the
society’s ground. This was new in this county; it was well
conducted, and the work well done. This exhibition promises
much, and should be introduced at all the annual county shows.
The Address, by Hon. Lorenzo Sabine, should be read by every
young man who is desirous of making progress, in this country ;
it abounded in wise maxims, and will do him much credit.
After the Address, the society and invited guests, with the
ladies, marched to the Town Hall. The banquet was got up
in fine style, and was, as we were informed, the first occasion
of the ladies joining. Judge Hoar, the president of the
society, the master spirit of the day, presided on this occasion;
his fitness for this department, as well as any other where he
can be induced to act, cannot be excelled. Judge Hoar very
discreetly, on this oceasion, called out some of the old, who
had been pioneers in this society. The ladies added much to
the gayety of the occasion, all were pleased to see them, and

126 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

a

we trust hereafter, they will enforce their rights, and never per-
mit the gentlemen to dine alone. We must not omit a practice
which we learned incidentally, which we deem of much impor-
tance, viz.: a committee, previous to the exhibition, made a tour
through the county, visiting farms, stock, fields, orchards,
nurseries, &c., and ina free and leisure manner, learned the
practices of the different farmers, and by comparison freshly
collected, were able to make a most instructive report, which
your committee consider of nearly, if not of quite as much
importance as all the rest of the report, of the doings of the
county. ,

The above is most respectfully submitted by your committee.

B. V. FRENCH.”

WORCESTER SOCIETY.

Handling, a few days since, a parcel of refuse newspapers,
in which minerals had been packed, a notice of the “First Cattle
Show and Exhibition of Domestic Manufactures of the Worces-
ter County Agricultural Society,’ met my eye. This was in
the fall of 1819. The society was organized, says the old
paper, in 1818, and at this first exhibition had five hundred and
fifty members, and a fund of nearly $3,000. The occasion is
described as one of great interest. Sixty pens were found too
few for the one hundred and thirty-five animals presented, one
hundred and twenty of which were competitors for premiums.

Hon. Judge Lincoln presided at the table, assisted by the
Hon. Mr. Waldo, acting vice-president. Hon. Levi Lincoln
delivered the Address.

In the exhibition, fifteen yoke of oxen were entered, and
their strength and‘training tested by drawing a cart weighing
eleven hundred two quarters and fourteen pounds gross weight,
loaded with 4,920 pounds of stone, up a hill of four degrees,
forty minutes elevation, and also by backing it up the same hill.
They were further tried by being hitched to a drag loaded with

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES. 127

seventeen cwt. of stone, and drawing it up the same hill, and
afterwards with a plough on a piece of uneven ground.

A five-year old ox, weighing 1,931 pounds, took the first
premium for fat cattle, and one weighing 1,871 pounds, the
second. Capt. Brooks, of Princeton, exhibited two fat oxen,
one weighing 1,890, the other 1,862 pounds. Cattle, sheep, and
swine in abundance were present.

Among the manufactured articles, were broadcloths, cassi-
meres, satinetts, hats, leather, &c. Nine skeins of tow yarn,
from thirty-three to thirty-seven skeins to the pound, spun on
a great wheel by a lady of Worcester, were exhibited. Mention
is made of nearly seven hundred pounds of cheese among a
great variety of other articles.

Thirty-four years have passed. The fathers have gone away.
Another generation are the acting, moving spirits of the day;
but the efficiency, thoroughness and energy in action, which
appear so clearly marked in the arrangements of this first show,
we distinctly recognized in the doings of the present season.
At first view, we might overlook the great progress which the
thirty-four years have produced. There was the same drawing
and backing the two tons of stone up a hill, which we witnessed
so successfully executed; and the number of animals exhibited,
although faliing much below the present number, was truly
respectable. But a second thought will show the difference.
There were, in 1853, working cattle, four years old, almost as
heavy as the heaviest fat oxen of 1819. The horticultural
department had, in this early show, scarcely a germ of existence.
A department that, some years since, had become so extensive
that it was deemed expedient to colonize it, and the Worcester
County Horticultural Society, with its splendid hall and its
three days’ exhibition, its 700 entries of pears, 229 of apples,
213 of other fruits, its 151 entries of vegetables, and 86 of
flowers, is now an independent organization, under its own
board of gentlemanly and efficient officers. Having had its birth
and training in the old mansion, it has, in accordance with the
true law of progress, gone out, and is doing a splendid business
on its own account. So of the results of mechanical and manu-
facturing labor. These have, for the most part, disappeared
from the agricultural show; but it is not because they have

128 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

ceased to exist, but because they outgrew the limits assigned
them, and required a new organization and more extended
limits. Hence, another colony, “The Worcester Mechanics’
Association,” making, occasionally, a most splendid display of
the productions of art and skill, and doing honor to herself and
honor to her parentage.

Having settled these two daughters so haypily, and given to
each the best of all marriage portions, a good practical educa-
tion, for the business of their choice, and habits of industry and
energetic action in that business, the old society has concen-
trated her resources and redoubled her energies. <A beautiful
plot of seven acres of land has this year been purchased and
enclosed with a heavy board fence, having massive granite posts.
The grounds have been graded, very substantially framed pens
built, and preparations put in progress for large and commodious
halls, for all the wants of the society. Within this enclosure
are all the items of the show, except the ploughing and the
drawing match, and to it a fee of ten or twelve cents gives
admission. A small building, already erected, was occupied by
the secretary, and also for the exhibition of butter and cheese,
and “ Wright’s Tent” sheltered the dinner, the annual Address,
and all things pertaining to that department. Some incon-
veniencies attended the unfinished state of plans projected, but
the energy of the executive board was more than sufficient for
all these. .

It is not necessary or desirable that I should enter largely
into the statistics of this exhibition. Her own reports will do
this far better than I can. For ploughing, the premiums were
well contested. This society, in common with many others,
finds it somewhat difficult to find good ground within a reason-
able distance. The land ploughed was somewhat uneven, not
free from stone, nor uniform in the depth of the surface soil.
The teams were mostly oxen, a part of them composed of two
yoke, almost invariably in good flesh and strength, and well
trained. Both the ploughing, and subsequent drawing and
backing, showed that thorough training of cattle is here a thing
well understood and generally pursued. The ploughs were,
for the most part, of the larger class. The double, or Michigan,
was conspicuous in the number. We notice, in all our societies,

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES. 129

heavier ploughs and deeper ploughing is becoming the order of
the day. The work was done with a good degree of delibera-
tion, and good plowghing was evidently the first object of most
of the competitors. The drawing succeeded the ploughing, and
elicited quite as much attention. Entering upon the grounds
of the society, we witnessed a trial of three year-old steers on
a cart loaded with stone. The exhibition, both in drawing and
backing, was very satisfactory. The “no progress men” knew,
as usual, that the steers were “at least a year older than they
were called, because they were too large for three-year olds.”
But the training was as tall as the cattle.

In the pens was a beautiful display of Devon cattle, by Mr.
Dodge, of Sutton, and a fine exhibition of Ayrshires, by Mr.
Brooks, of Princeton. There was a large number of various
ages in each collection. Many fine animals were entered by
other members. Some fine Alderney cows were placed on exhi-
bition for the pleasure of the society by Mr. Salisbury. ‘They
had been off ship some three or four days only, and bore the
marks of an unusually long and severe voyage, notwithstanding
all which, the beautiful animals were fully recognized. In
horses, a larger exhibition may be expected another season.
The number of swine was not very large, but the animals were
generally decidedly good. Some of them very large. The
exhibition of sheep was fair, and the poultry was out in full
feather.

In the number of cows and amount of butter and cheese, we
were somewhat disappointed. The cows, all told, fell below a
dozen, and the entries of butter and cheese did not much exceed
ten or twelve cf each. Ina county so preéminently a grazing
county that uo premiums are offered for corn or other grain
crops, we looked for a large exhibition of cows, and of all the
products of the cow. The premiums-were liberal, but the
competitors few.

The Worcester County Agricultural Society is now a society
of men. It has but a feeble hold on the sympathies and smiles
of the ladies, so far as may be inferred from their coéperation
in the festivities of the occasion. This, we view, a serious loss,
and yet we see no way that it can be avoided. Should a second
day be allotted to the show, giving more time for the dinner,

17

130 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

we see not why the ladies might not still be efficient co-workers
at least in one important part of the transactions of the day.

The number of persons in attendance was also less than at
some other gatherings of a similar character. This was the
more noticeable from the place of the exhibition, at the heart
of the Commonwealth, and the heart of so large and rich an
agricultural county, especially in connection with the fact that
but one day was devoted to the show.

Two things appear to us extremely desirable in the affairs of
an agricultural society. The first is definiteness and accuracy
in all its doings. To this the Worcester Society have directed
much attention, and in a high degree secured their object.

Very accurate measurements are required in every thing
capable of being thus determined, and full and definite state-
ments of what it is, and how it was produced, made the condi-
tion of all successful competition. So far as we have observed,
the Worcester Society is, in this particular, leading all the
other associations in the State.

We place popularity as the second object, or rather the
equally important object. We use the term in a high and noble
sense, as designating that power which takes hold on the great
mass of the people, moving the heart to activity in personal
investigation, and the hand to energetic action; which shall
give the society and its interests a place in all the plans of the
season; which shall cause “ Cattle Show” in all the dwellings,
not only in the sunny valley, but on the colder hill-sides, to be
an era from which, like Thanksgiving and 4th of July, time shall
be measured; an event of which every farmer shall speak as of
a concern in which he has a personal interest, entitling him to
use the terms we and owr whenever he speaks of it, and of his
_purposes in reference to it. Without this popularity, a society
will become a club of amateurs, making many valuable investi-
gations, and recording them for the instruction of the world;
but when the results of that instruction are looked for, the
truth will appear, that the eye must be opened before it can be
made to see, and inquiry elicited, before the answer will be
needed, and that in agricultural education, as well as in all
other education, personal exertion and personal interest, are
indispensable to success.

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES. 131

Without a proper combination of these two great objects,
and, without in some good degree, securing both, a society must
fail of accomplishing its great designs. To this point, more
than to any other, in our intercourse with different societies for
the last two years, havé we given thought and attention; and
in our mind, there is no one which has stronger claims on the
attention of the Board.

Although we may have extended this report to an unwar-
ranted length, we must be permitted to add, that a most cor-
dial reception was given us by the Worcester Society, and that
nothing was omitted on the part of its officers, which could
facilitate our purpose, or contribute to our comfort or pleas-
ure. We extend the same acknowledgments to the gentlemanly
officers of the Horticultural Society, and tender, personally,
and in behalf of the Board, to all, expressions of correspond-
ing gratitude and kind remembrance.

S. REED.

HAMPSHIRE, FRANKLIN AND HAMPDEN SOCIETY.

The annual exhibition of the Hampshire, Franklin and
Hampden Society took place at Northampton, on Tuesday and
Wednesday, the 11th and 12th of October. The weather was
favorable, and all circumstances seemed to conspire to make
the occasion an agreeable and profitable one. The morning of
the first day was bright, with a cool and bracing air, so that the
men of the hill-country and of the valleys, with their pleasant
wives and daughters, came out with hearty good will to join
the happy festival. I was fortunate in being on the ground early
in the morning to see the cattle, horses, sheep, and swine, in
single groups as well as collectively.

My attention—after the stock had generally come upon the
eround—was first directed to the swine. The collection was
not numerous, but there were several lots of fine propor-

132 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

tions, which did credit to their keepers. There were none of
entire purity of any one blood.

From the swine I passed to the sheep, among which were
the French and Spanish Merinos and Silesian; they appeared
finely, and -did not belong to that class of which there is “a
great cry and little wool.”

The working oxen, twenty-five pairs from South Hadley,
and about as many more from Hadley, with many single pairs,
attracted especial attention. They were mostly of the common
breed; were of fine size and form, and, I believe, could not be ex-
celled by an equal number of any particular breed in the country ;
and when [ afterward saw their skill and power when hitchéd
to the cart and plough, I felt confirmed in the opinion, formed
while standing by their side in the morning, that they cannot
be excelled by any other breed for actual service on the road
or farm. Whether they can be, as intended for the shambles,
I was not so clear.

In the department of fat cattle, Thave seen nothing at any
of the shows this autumn to compare favorably with those ex-
hibited at Northampton. They were numerous and of the
highest order. One pair, exhibited by Moses Stebbins, of
Deerfield, weighed 4,300 pounds. A pair from Hatfield, pre-
sented by Mr. Billings, weighed 5,000 pounds. Edmund Smith,
of South Hadley, presented a pair of steers, two years and nine
months old, that weighed 3,070 pounds. The oxen by Mr. _
Stebbins were of the Devon blood, and the steers by Mr. Smith,
of the Short-horn. A pair of four-year old oxen weighing
4,380 pounds, which were very fine, were presented by Cephas
May, of Conway.

Some excellent milch cows were on the ground, though there
were not many in all, presented. One, owned by Jotham A.
Clark, had produced fifteen pounds and one ounce of butter in
seven days, with only the common pasture feed. She was bred
by the president of the society, the Hon. Paoli Lathrop, from
his famous stock of Short-horns.

Among the young cattle I noticed marks of the Hereford,
Short-horn, Devon, and Ayrshire blood, mingled with our
native. I was particularly pleased with a very fine Short-horn
heifer, the property of Mr. Lathrop, and another, one year and

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES. 133

twelve days old, for which he informed me he could have taken
$200.

In the Exhibition Hall, the fruits were abundant. Around
a dish of the common crab apple, were thirty varieties of fine
fruit, all springing from that common centre; reading to all a
homily upon the effects of careful culture.

There was a fine variety of vegetables, giving plenty of
evidence that the garden is appreciated. The poultry was in
full feather—the cocks as noisy as ever, and the hens crammed
in their narrow coops, speaking as loudly as they could—“I
can’t get out—lI can’t get out!”

‘There were very few farm implements—Ketchum’s mowing
machine, a hay cutter or two, and some small tools, comprising
the whole display.

What pleased me much was a hydraulic ram, set up, and,
water being supplied, showing to all on the spot its practical
working. This was worth more to the multitude, than whole
quires of description.

The drawing match was well contested—load 5,000 pounds;
teams and teamsters, skilful.

Of horses there was a good show—some of them very
fine.

Sixteen teams ploughed, mostly two horses; a pair of horses,
owned and driven by Mr. Elisha Strong, of Northampton, while
he himself held the plough, did the work with more ease, exact-
ness and skill than I ever witnessed before ; and this I say, living
as I do,among many of the best ploughmen in the country. Mr.
Strong had no whip, and no loud word escaped his lips during
the time he was engaged. There was perfect harmony between
himself and team; a single low tone would arrest, or haw or
gee them instantly, or quicken or decrease their movements.
On coming out of the furrow and mingling with another team
from the opposite land, a single word would extricate them
with almost mechanical precision. That single exhibition of
skill was the admiration of every beholder.

The services at the church were exceedingly interesting.
The Address was by Wm. 8. King, Esq., editor of the Journal
of Agriculture. His subject was: “How can farming be made
to pay,” and the general divisions were,

134 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

1. That it does not now pay as it ought to, and as liberally
as other occupations.

2. Why it does not pay.

3. How it can be made to pay.

Under these general divisions, Mr. King went into details
of importance and interest to every farmer. He thought
that those engaged in other occupations, had generally brought
more mind to bear upon them, and conducted their affairs more
systematically and certainly. Men were reluctant to acknowl-
edge science to be an application of the mind to their business.
He spoke of the maximum, minimum, and. average crops of the
State of Rhode Island; carrots had a range of from one thou-
sand to seventy-five bushels per acre, while the average was
four hundred bushels; onions, from six hundred to fifty, with
an average of three hundred; corn, forty; rye, forty to three,
average twelve and a half; hay, three tons to half a ton
per acre, with an average of one ton. The Address was prac-
tical and earnest, and was listened to with close attention by
a large audience.

After the Address, a most interesting report was read by Rev.
M. E. White, of Southampton, on Domestic Manufactures.

At the dinner table, Mr. Lathrop, the president, introduced
the company to each other in general terms, spoke of the
pleasures of the farmers’ festival, of the gratification and
honor he felt in being the president of such an association, and
then introduced the secretary, W. O. Gorham, Esq., who spoke
of the value and moral effect of these gatherings, in the most
brilliant and beautiful terms.

Intermingled with the reports of the society, were short
speeches, from several persons. Your secretary was present,
and spoke earnestly and eloquently of the importance of the
occupation, to us all, and of the high satisfaction he felt in wit-
nessing such a degree of perfection and prosperity in the
society.

Your delegate spoke to them briefly, of the beautiful town
where they had assembled—of their mountain scenery, sweep-
ing meadows, and natural fertility of the soil. He also alluded
to some of the popular errors of the day, in relation to farm-
ing, such as :—

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES. 135

ist. That farming, as an occupation, is not profitable. This
idea is carefully inculeated, why, he knew not, and is working
incalculable mischief in the country, by turning the industry of
thousands of both sexes into other channels, who, otherwise,
would have engaged in this primitive and healthful employ-
ment.

2d. That the prevalent and pernicious opinion has prevailed
among all our people, that “any body would do for a farmer!”
That, if among a family of children there were evidences in some
of unusual aptitude and talent, those must be selected for other
professions, and aided by all the helps of our schools and col-
leges. While the dull and indifferent would make good-enough
farmers! These were errors, he thought, resting like an ineu-
bus upon the community, and paralyzing the efforts of the friends
of the cause. And

3d. That, as a great class, we had not sought the aid and
countenance of the other sex, and made the occupation an
agreeable and attractive one to them. In the mechanical de-
partment, and especially in manufactures, the best minds are
exercised to please the eye, lighten the labor, and gratify the
taste of the females of our households. This will be evident to
all on entering the shops of the mechanic, or looking upon the
shelves of the merchant. But with the farmer it has not been so.
With women, the prevalent idea of the farm-house, is, that of
drudgery. They have been made to believe that the refinements
and clegancies of life are there out of place ; that books, recrea-
tion, healthful amusements, and interchanges of visits are for
those engaged in other avocations. How often is the farm
embellished with a beautiful garden, filled with fruits, shrubbery
and flowers, attracting all into its peaceful shades, or to inhale
its fragrant breath! Or, the farm-house, supplied with those
nameless conveniences or comforts, or luxuries, in the way of
furniture or ornament, which may be found in the dwelling of
the merchant, the physician, the mechanic, and often, even, in
that of the day laborer! If they are necessary, they are as
much so to the wives and daughters of the farmer, as to any
other class. If they can be afforded by the mechanic, or the
shop-keeper, they certainly can by the farmer.

Remarks were also made by Dr. Cleaveland, of Northampton.

136 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

Many ladies were present, and greatly enhanced the enjoyments
of the occasion.

The exhibition, then, in all its principal features, I consider
a successful one; indicating progress and profit in the great
art. In saying this, however, your delegate does not believe
that he is answering the full expectation of the State, as a re-
turn for its encouragement and bounty to the several societies.
The condition of agriculture, I believe, will afford a pretty fair
index of the condition of the people. If agriculture is feebly
sustained, we shall find the mechanic arts, manufactures, and
commerce, suffering with it; and even religion, literature, and
the fine arts, will take their hue from the condition of agricul-
ture, in the State. If prospering, it imparts life and energy to
every other calling. This exhibition afforded evidence that
the farmer is progressing and prosperous. The churches and
school-houses, gave evidence of this; so did the homesteads,
the fences, the fields, barns, stock, implements, and the urbanity
and refinement of manner of the people themselves. <A great
contrast would be noticeable to the traveller through the State,
at the present time, and twenty yearsago. Comparatively few
tenements can be found now, unpainted, and presenting few
appearances of comfort, while, at that period, many were
everywhere observable, dilapidated, loose, and leaning, with
hingeless doors, and windows darkened with cast-off hats and
pantaloons. Fences were straggling—cattle shivered by the
road-side, or poached the fields during the day, and cringed in
their stancheons at night, over scanty fodderings of meadow
hay. With a higher degree of the cultivation of the soil, a
higher standard of morals has grown up, and these combined,
give a new aspect to the face of the earth, and to society.
Our foster-mother, the good old Commonwealth, ought to know
that her munificence is appreciated, and is working important
and favorable changes in the condition of her children.

Respectfully submitted by

Simon Brown.

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES. 137

FRANKLIN SOCIETY.

It was my privilege, under the direction of the State Board
of Agriculture, to be present at Greenfield on the 6th and Tth
days of October. This was the fourth exhibition by this
flourishing Society. I have witnessed many of the kind, but
none that impressed me more favorably, by the order and pro-
priety of movement throughout. Many of the most prominent
citizens of the county engaged heartily in directing the con-
cerns; all ready to work, no one appearing to feel above his
business. This is emphatically the farmers’ working day;
whoever takes part at a cattle show, must be ready “to hold
or drive,” as occasion may demand.

The object that first arrested my attention, was a team of
about one hundred pairs of working oxen, gathered from the
adjoining towns; more from the good farming town of Shel-
burne, than any other. These oxen, I estimated to average
about five years old, and to girt six and a half feet. Many of
them were well mated and in fine condition.

My attention was next directed to the milch cows, as an
essential part of the cattle show. I was informed that the
number of animals presented of this class, was about thirty;
but most of them had left the ground before one o’clock, P. M.,
of the first day. Iwas disappointed, in not seeing these ani-
mals, and so must many others have been who came to see.
All animals entered at such an exhibition, should remain on
the ground, and be fed from a common stock, until the show is
over. I learned from the chairman of the committee on cows,
that one of those exhibited, had yielded more than sixteen
pounds of butter ina week. Such a cow would be creditable
to any exhibition. They are not often found to do this upon
pasture feed only—which is the only fair way of testing their
quality for dairy purposes. When pampered with shorts,
Indian meal, carrots, or other extra feed, they may do great
things for a short time, but their ability to do so will soon be
exhausted. Without hesitation, I should say, that a cow which
yields two pounds of butter a day, on common pasture feed,

18

138 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

from June to October, may be set down as avery superior cow.
Among the heifers, I noticed several from the island of Jersey,
recently imported by Judge Grennell. Iam glad that the farm-
ers of the county will thus have an opportunity of seeing
specimens of this class of which so much is said. Of the
quality of their milk for the making of butter, there can be no
question. Of the quantity, Tam not fully informed, but think
favorably. I have seen one of these cows at Nahant, that
yielded eighteen quarts of milk, daily.

Of bulls, there was a good number, about twenty in all, some
of them very superior animals. Too much attention cannot be
paid to the selection of males, for the rearing of stock. I
should as soon think of raising “figs from thistles,’ as good
progeny from inferior bulls. All those best experienced in
these matters, are particular, not only to have their bulls of
good character in themselves, but the descendants of those of
good character. Iam satisfied that no animals are worthy of
premium, that have not been reared with particular regard to
their quality. Why should a premium be awarded for an
animal that chances to be good? To be sure, such animals
may occasionally be found, but no one can claim any merit for
their being so. The object of cattle shows is, to give oppor-
tunity to reward praiseworthy efforts in improving stock.
With this view, many are anxious to introduce upon our farms
improved breeds of animals, from foreign countries; and with-
out doubt, benefits may accrue in this way. But my impres-
sion is, we have, in the native stock of our own hills, as good
stamina for improvement, as can anywhere be found. Cer-
tainly, for labor and the dairy, the two grand purposes of keep-
ing animals. Perhaps some of the full fed Durhams may grow
larger than the natives; but these when well fed, will answer
all ordinary purposes, and they may be kept at much less
expense.

In my admiration of the working ox, I had almost forgotten
to notice the fatted ox, of which there were a number that
weighed, alive, more than two thousand pounds. Seven pre-
miums were awarded for fat oxen; and I fully concur in the
opinion expressed by the discriminating chairman of this com-
mittee, that those who would entitle themselves to a premium

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES. 139

for fine animals, should, at the same time, furnish an intelligent
statement how they were made so, as did Mr. Charles Wells,
of the pair of cattle raised on his farm. The main purpose of
premiums is, to elicit information, to enable others to “go and
do likewise.”

There was an exhibition of sheep, such as befitted the fine
pastures in this mountainous region. Some of almost every
variety, and of superior excellence. Not being expert in the
distinguishing characters of these useful animals, I must leave
their merits to be spoken of particularly, by the committee
that examined them.

The show of steers was very good indeed, most of those
exhibited being marked with Durham blood; indicating more
favorably of this class of animals, than I have ever before wit-
nessed, and affording evidence unmistakable, if size is the
consideration principally to be regarded, the Durhams go ahead
of all others. When ten pair of two-year olds, averaging
2,500 pounds, and eight pair of three-year olds, averaging more
than 3,000 pounds, are brought together in one small county, as
was here done, J am disposed to say, “ beat this who can.”

Of the swine exhibited, I saw but little; my attention was
attracted mostly to the elaborate report of the distinguished
chairman of the committee. The growing of swine, is one of
the objects demanding the constant attention of the farmer;
both as it relates to his profit in the business, and the improve-
ment of his lands, in preparing fertilizing materials for his
crops. I know of farms where the net profits of the swine
kept thereon exceed a thousand dollars annually; no mean
item in the balance sheet of the farmer.

Of horses, the show was very superior, far surpassing any
before seen in the county, and, as I was informed, in any adjoin.
ing county. It is gratifying to witness the increased attention
given to the rearing of this useful animal; and particularly to
insuring animals of the best blood. It is quite as easy to rear
an animal that will be worth one hundred dollars or more, at
three years old, as one-quarter part this amount, by care in
beginning right. Whoever will presume to grow horses should
be mindful how they start. Good blood ina horse, should

140 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

be first sought in all efforts at rearing them. He that -
buys any thing short of this, will surely “pay dear for his
whistle.”

Space will not admit of reference, in detail, to many other
objects exhibited. Suffice it to say, that the spacious new Town
Hall of Greenfield—worthy of any city in the State—was well
filled throughout, affording a gratifying view to a numerous crowd
of visitors, and a remunerating income to the managers of the
exhibition. This mingling of the “sweet with the useful,” in
agricultural exhibitions, is a new feature, but one that contains
within itself, when properly regulated, a self-sustaining power,
almost equivalent to perpetual motion. Wisely have the citi-
zens of this beautiful town, thus freely furnished such ample
accommodations for their friends and neighbors, the farmers of
the county; thereby giving a permanence to the place of ex-
hibition—a thing greatly desired in many counties, where it
cannot conveniently be had.

On the ploughing field were about a dozen teams, which per-
formed their work to admiration. There should have been
three times as many. Although great perfection has been at-
tained in this fundamental operation on the farm, there is still
room for very great improvements. Who thought, five years
azo, of the benefits to be derived from the operations of the
double plough, that lays five inches of the under soil directly
upon three inches of the sod, and ina form so broken and
pulverized, as to be fit for immediate culture. This improved
implement alone, if I do not mistake, will be a saving of thou-
sands of dollars, annually, to the Commonwealth. The more
I see of its operations, the better I like it; and never have I
witnessed it holden more successfully, than on the meadow
banks of the Connecticut, at Greenfield.

While all the performances in the field were so satisfactorily
completed, the indoor operations were equally well done. A
crowded assemblage of stalwart yeomanry listened for one and
a half hours, to the fluent and sensible discourse of Dr. D.
Lee, of Rochester, N. Y. Without the embarrassment of
notes, he proceeded to explain the phenomena of vegetable
culture and growth, with his ear of corn and potato in hand,
ina manner that commanded the undivided attention of his

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES. 141

hearers. This is the talk for farmers. They want none of
your high wrought, speculative disquisitions on super-phos-
phates, and the like.

Ihave only time to express my acknowledgments, for the
kind attentions I received from the president and secretary of
the society.

JoHN W. Proctor.

BERKSHIRE SOCIETY.

Having been honored by your Board, with the appointment .
of delegate to the annual autumnal exhibitionand show of the
Berkshire County Society, I beg leave briefly to submit some
of the results of my observations. I considered myself
peculiarly fortunate, in being delegated to this frontier county,
as I had long had a desire to extend my acquaintance with that
favored section of the Commonwealth. My pursuits in life
not having run in an agricultural line, I may not be able fully
and justly to appreciate all the excellencies of the exhibition,
or speak of them with the authority of a practical, or even
theoretical farmer. Yet, there was so much that was undeni-
ably good, and worthy of admiration, that I must have been
profoundly stupid, as well as ignorant, not to have had some
appreciation, at least, of what I witnessed with so much pleas-
ure and satisfaction.

The exhibition was held in Pittsfield, one of the most beauti-
ful towns, in all our dear New England, and in one of the
grandest counties that the sun shines upon. If nature has made
Berkshire the most magnificent county in the Commonwealth,
art, as if not to be outdone, has rendered her one of the most
beautiful. Take any of her hill-tops, as a stand point, the eye
never rested upon amore splendid panorama. ‘Travel over
her surface, and everywhere evidences are present, of intelli-
gence, wealth, industry, social culture and successful husbandry.

142 - BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

The show certainly did honor to so favored a county, particularly
excelling in those departments of agriculture that for their
highest success require good grazing land. Hence, the speci-
mens of stock were of a high order. The working oxen,
steers and cows, spoke for themselves, that they had the best
of pasturage, and the kindest care. One cow was exhibited,
three-fourths Durham, and one-fourth native, that yielded six-
teen quarts of milk a day, from June to October. The ex-
hibition of sheep, also, was remarkably fine. Some sections of
Vermont might equal it, but nowhere in Massachusetts could
such flocks be produced. One buck was shown, that sheared
ten pounds and ten ounces of wool, at one shearing.

In like manner the results of the dairy, butter and cheese,
would do credit to Orange County, in New York, or to any
section, in or out of New England. There were twelve entries
of cheese, several single ones weighing sixty pounds. The
show of swine was very good, and so was that of fowls; in the
raising of which there appears to be an increasing interest,
here and elsewhere.

In regard to fruits, the year, as is well known, was not favor-
able to the apple, still there were some very fine specimens,
and also of pears and quinces.

Specimens of potatoes and other roots, and garden vege-
tables were very respectable, and there was a remarkably fine
show of grass seed. , .

The excellence of such exhibitions, as the one we are con-
sidering, does not consist, in my judgement, in presenting a few
solitary specimens of mammoth growth, which may be, to be
sure, objects of curiosity, but in the average good quality
of the products shown. Judged by this standard, the Pittsfield
exhibition would stand high.

One of the most interesting and attractive features of the
exhibition, was the handiwork of the fair ladies of Berkshire.
The most beautiful yarns, counterpanes, carpetings, and fancy
work, of various kinds, were displayed throughout the spacious
hall, all of which were highly creditable to the ingenuity, skill,
and taste of those who wrought the fabrics.

An exhibition of trotting horses came off toward the close
of the first day, and a goodly number of beautiful animals ex-

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES. 143

cited the admiration of the numerous spectators. Not being
able to remain the second day, I unfortunately missed seeing
the ploughing match.

Respectfully submitted,

EvisHa Huntineron.

HOUSATONIC SOCIETY.

It is somewhat singular, that in the three years that this
Board and its predecessor has sent delegates to the several
societies, there has been a failure in every instance, of those
accredited to the Housatonic. It has, consequently, fallen to
the lot of my Berkshire colleague and myself, alternately, on
notice given, not “the day after the fair,’ but many days after,
to make a note of its transactions. The Housatonic Society is
deserving of better treatment.

This is comparatively a young society. Its members are
thorough-going, active farmers and other citizens. They are
working men, willing to investigate the principles which lie at
the foundation of good culture in all things, and to test the re-
sults by the labor of their own hands. Great Barrington, the
place of the annual gathering, is a beautiful village, in the Valley
of the Housatonic, directly and easily accessible by railroad, at
all times. The exhibitions of the society are always good, and
always well attended by the great mass of the people. We are
not sufficiently conversant with all parts of the State to speak
with certainty, but we doubt whether a society more truly
popular, one standing higher in the affections of the whole
people, of all ages and employments, can be found in the Com-
monwealth. Certainly, very few can be found, in which the
liberality of the State produces a return of richer blessings on
the whole people.

This society uses funds with a most laudable economy. The
contingent expenses are kept down to a very low point, and

144 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

every dollar made to tell upon the encouragement of beneficial
objects.

The reports of the various committees will show the extent
and variety of objects fostered by the society. The premiums
in every department are warmly contested. The results of the
contest show, beyond all dispute, that mind as wellas muscle is
active; that the largest manure heap will not command the
largest premium, without skill in using it; that the man who
enters ordinary animals which have “come up” without plan
and careful attention to breeding and judicious feeding, and if
oxen, matching and training, cannot carry away many “ cups or
spoons;” that the day has passed, when comparisons are to be
made between spontaneous productions; but, that the best
efforts of nature must be aided by good judgment and judi-
cious culture, in order to command the smiles of committees.

The Housatonic Society, like the old Berkshire, finds full
business for two days. All entries are made in the forenoon
of the first day. The afternoon is in the hands of the commit-
tees, during which all entries are examined, crops excepted.
These are previously entered and examined in the field, when
as near maturity as may be; two visits being made, one for the
summer, and one for fall crops. At the close of the first day,
animals may be removed if their owners wish.

The ploughing match is the first object on the second day,
and calls to the field a great multitude, of both sexes, in car-
riages and on foot. The horticultural department, the domestic
manufactures, the specimens of taste and skill from the hands
of the ladies, the butter and cheese, in which there are often
twenty or more competitors, the agricultural and mechanical
implements, etc., are open to the inspection of all without
fee, the principle being, the greatest facilities for all to see and
learn, that they may go away and do likewise.

At eleven o’clock, the society, and more of the rest of the
world than can get within hearing distance, repair to the
church, where the Pilgrim’s God is acknowledged as the giver
of the sunshine and the shower, and His blessing supplicated
for the labors of another year. The annual Address is then
given; after which, the reports—the last anniversary abstracts
of reports—read and the premiums, in silver plate, distributed

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES. 145

to the successful competitors. This public coronation of the
victor, not with a myrtle wreath, but with a silver trophy, is
not without its effect.

The dinner is the closing exercise of the day, and always
proves that the day is too short.

The Housatonic Society is in a very healthy and prosperous
condition, and doing a great and good work for Southern
Berkshire.

S. REED.

BRISTOL SOCIETY.

The undersigned, a committee appointed by the Massachu-
setts Board of Agriculture, to visit the Bristol County Agri-
cultural Society, respectfully report :—

That, in consequence of a severe domestic affliction in the
family of the undersigned, at the time of the annual exhibition
of the above-named society, he was unable to be present to
perform the duty assigned. His inability was deeply regretted,
especially as your committee was charged with a similar duty
the last year, and which he was, from confinement to a sick bed,
incapacitated from discharging.

Your committee, however, have the pleasure to state, that
“from information of the most reliable character, the exhibition
was in all its parts, of a highly creditable order, to which
the Secretary of the Board, who was present, can bear
testimony; that in several of the departments, the products
were better than ever before; that a marked, progressive im-
provement had been going on since the elevation to the chair
of the society of its present energetic presiding officers. What-
eyer praise may be awarded to the other members of this
vigorous and flourishing association, it is but justice to state,
that much of the zeal now manifested by the good people of
Bristol, in the welfare of their society, has arisen from the
interest evinced by its efficient head in the cause of agriculture,

19

146 BOARD-OF AGRICULTURE.

and in a desire to place the Bristol Society on a par with the
most favored society in the State.

The undersigned regrets that he has not the means of making
a full and detailed report, but hopes, if a kind Providence should
spare his life and health, that at some future day he may be
able to perform the agreeable service which has been hereto-
fore assigned to him.

MarsHaLtL P. WILDER.

NEW ENGLAND CLIMATE. 147

METEOROLOGICAL RESEARCH.

The following communication has been made to the Board of
Agriculture on the Climate of New England. An important
point in inquiries of this nature is, whether the periodical returns
of extreme cold are not less frequent now, or, in other words,
whether the cycles of change have not been materially lengthen-
ed. It is believed by many scientific men, and thought to be
strikingly corroborated by observation, that they have. This
question, it will be seen, did not come within the range of the
writer’s investigation. The recurrence of what is called the
“January thaw” is, it is thought, far more irregular now than
formerly, while the phenomena of the Aurora Borealis appear
far more frequently. ‘The appearance of these phenomena was
comparatively rare many years ago. Whether they are con-
nected with any change of climate is not yet fully known. The
paper is so interesting and valuable that it is given entire :—

REMARKS ON THE CLIMATE OF NEW ENGLAND.
BY J. C. GRAY.

It has been a general, and is perhaps still a prevailing im-
pression among the inhabitants of New England, that our climate
is much warmer now than two hundred years since. This
position has been distinctly assumed by some of our best histo-
rians and naturalists, and many ingenious reasons have been
given for the change. The explanation which seems to have
met with most favor is that which ascribes the alleged softening
of the winter’s cold to the clearing away of large tracts of for-
est trees. It is believed, however, that the position itself may
be fairly called in question, and that philosophers, by a mistake
not unprecedented in the observers of natural phenomena, have
employed themselves much more diligently in accounting for a
striking phenomenon which they have assumed to exist, than in
collecting precise evidence to determine the fact of such exist-
ence. Much less of this evidence exists than could be wished,

148 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

or than is now customary to collect and preserve on all scientific
topics. The science of meteorology, or the observance of the
weather, in the largest sense of the words, is even now in its
infancy, and the instruments necessary to carrying on such
observations with precision, are of very modern date. The
thermometer was little used im this country, or even in older
countries, previous to the last century, and all instruments of
this kind employed in the early part of that century were very
imperfect. Till after the year 1750, the only thermometer
used in New England was Hawksbee’s. Not a single specimen
of this instrument is now known to exist. There is good reason,
however, to believe that it was much less accurate than any
thermometer now employed. During more than half a century,
however, that of Fahrenheit has been in general use throughout
‘New England at least, and we possess an exact register of ob-
servations made with it during more than forty years on one
spot, and by one individual, the venerable Dr. Holyoke, of Salem.
A particular account of this register may be found in a valuable
paper by the late Dr. H. Hale, in the Transactions of the
American Academy, Vol. 1, New Series. The temperature of
each day was thrice noted at the same hours during the whole
period. As acomparative statement, therefore, of the earlier
and later portions of that period, it is of smgular value. No
conclusion can be drawn from it, as Dr Hale has clearly shown,
favoring, in the least, the popular impression respecting the
amelioration of our climate. On the contrary, it seems evident
from Dr. Hale’s Essay, that from the year 1786 to the year
1829, the climate of the vicinity of Boston has continued essen-
tially the same. It should be recollected that in no previous
period, of equal length, were the changes greater or more ex-
tensive in the face of our country, as well as the condition of its
inhabitants, or greater inroads made on our ancient forests.
There is another interesting as well as important mode
of procuring light upon this question of change of climate, viz. :
by observing for years in succession the periodical changes in
the vegetation of our trees and shrubs. It has been observed
by the late Mr. Lowell, that “had there been precise records
kept of the date of flowering of trees in certain specific loca-
tions from the first settlement of the country, very much would

NEW ENGLAND CLIMATE. 149

have been done for the decision of the whole question as to
change of climate.” The venerable pear tree of Goy. Endicott,
had its times of flowering been punctually recorded by its seven
successive generations of proprietors, might have put all dispute
at rest. We possess no ancient registers of this description
kept with the exactness which Mr. Lowell recommended, and
which he actually put in practice at Roxbury through a period
of thirty-two years. But we have a similar record kept, on the
whole, with great regularity, by the late Rev. Thomas Smith, of
Portland, Maine. His diary of the seasons extends, with a few
unimportant exceptions, from 1722 to 1786, thus reaching back
to a century and a quarter ago. It appears from several
observations, made by him between the years 1751 and 1773,
that the average time of the blossoming of the cherry at Port-
land, during that period, was between the 12th and 13th of May.
Mr. Lowell states that the average at Roxbury, for several
years since the commencement of this century, was May 8th;
and from observations made by Gen. Dearborn in the same
city, from 1835 to 1847, inclusive, it appears that this average
should be fixed precisely at the same date within a fraction of
a day. When we consider that Portland lies north of Boston
by more than one degree, these facts, to which many of a similar
purport might be added, would seem to form evidence as con-
clusive as, under the circumstances, could reasonably be expect-
ed, against any supposition of a perceptible change in our
climate since the settlement of our country. Besides, had such
a change occurred to any material extent, we should find some
. proofs of its existence in what are called our half-hardy plants,
that is, plants which are a little, and only a little, too tender to
be exposed without protection throughout the year. Could it
be shown, for example, that that most beautiful evergreen, the
English Ivy, which has been cultivated by our florists for more
than half a century, could now endure our winters better than
formerly, this would furnish a proof of the softening of our
climate which it would be difficult to set aside. But we shall
search in vain for any instance of this description. Among the
many species of trees and shrubs which have been cultivated in
our gardens for two or three generations, it may be safely
asserted that there is not one which appears to have increased

150 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

in hardiness. But it may be asked in what way we are to
account for the impression that our climate has been growing
warmer since the settlement of our country, since neither the
existence nor the strength of the impression can in any degree
be gainsaid. A sufficient answer has been given by Dr. Hale,
viz.: that extraordinary seasons are remembered when the
intermediate years which are not marked by any unusual preva-
lence of heat or cold, are forgotten. As strong instances in
confirmation of Dr. Hale’s remark, we need only call to mind
the repeated references which we find in our annals, and which
many of us recollect in the conversation of our predecessors of
the last generation, to the long and dreary winter of 1779-80,
to which Virgil’s highly ornamented description of Scythian
cold might be applied with prosaic exactness. Those of us
who have passed the middle age, retain an equally distinct
recollection of the cold summer of 1816. Both these extraor-
dinary seasons dwelt tenaciously and distinctly in the memory
of many who could give no other account, however general, of
most other summers and winters of their time. It is not to be
doubted that the severe winter which occurred a few years
since, when a channel was hewn through the solid ice in Boston
harbor, in order to enable the steam vessel to proceed on her
regular voyage, will be often appealed to by writers of the next
generation as positive proof of the extreme rigor of our winters
at the present day.

Impressions of this description are particularly vivid in our
younger days. We all can recollect those made upon us by
such striking natural phenomena as occurred just within our
recollection, and more especially by those of our early winters.
When we recall the mountainous snow drifts, huge icicles, and
nipping blasts of those periods, we can hardly realize that any
winters of our later days are both equally severe and equally
magnificent ; and yet, all the precise evidence which we possess
compels us so to admit. It may be further observed, that the
severe winters of the last century have been recollected the
more vividly, because they were more severely felt than any
winter of the same severity would now be. Our people are
better clothed, our dwellings better fortified against cold, and
what is of still more moment, our roads are far more quickly

NEW ENGLAND CLIMATE. 151

rendered passable after heavy storms. A mass of snow which
sixty years since might have rendered travelling in our thinly
peopled country all but impossible for weeks together, is now
cleared away or beaten down in a very few days.

A single extract from Smith’s Diary, (the work above re-
ferred to,) will show that former generations had their mild as
well as their severe winters. Under date of March 7, 1775,
he remarks, that the frost seemed out of the ground in
the streets of Falmouth, (now Portland,) and this he calls a
wonderful winter, and so it would now be considered. It was
not, however, unexampled, for Mount, in his relation of the
affairs of Plymouth, as quoted in Prince’s Chronology, says
under the same date, in the year 1621: “We begin to sow our
garden seeds.” Had we fuller records on this subject, many
more such instances might be brought to light.*

But unfortunately such observers as Smith and Holyoke,
have been at all times rare, though there is every reason to
hope, that they will be much more numerous in the present
condition of the natural sciences. It may be safely asserted,
however, that this idea of the gradual softening of our winters
finds less and less support in proportion as we descend from
general impressions to precise statistics. This is not the only
alteration supposed to have occurred in our New England
climate. It is a common impression, that our summer droughts
are more frequent, and of longer continuance than formerly.
If we could believe that there existed such a tendency in our
climate, it would certainly be a most unwelcome conclusion.
But the fact may be, not that these droughts are more severe
than formerly, but that their effects have become of more con-
sequence, and have been perceived in more ways by our present
far more numerous and wide-spread population. 'To say nothing
of these effects as exhibited on a wide extent of cultivated land,

* Macgregor, in his elaborate work on the Progress of America, Vol. 2, p. 42,
observes, ** That the Baron La Hontan, is recorded to have left Quebec, in 1690,
on the 20th of November. He adds that this is as late as any vessel can or will
leave that port at the present. Potrincourt and Champlain, on a Sunday, early in
January, 1607, sailed in‘a boat six miles up to Port Royal, (Annapolis, Nova
Scotia,) to visit a field of winter wheat, dined in the sunshine, enjoyed music in
the open air, &e. No winter since has been milder.”

152 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

‘they are rendered still-more striking in the lowering of the
streams which move our factories, and still more of the great
rivers through which so much of our vast internal commerce is
carried on. But, that droughts are in truth, more frequent and
severe in any part of our country, at the present day, than a
eentury ago, is a proposition for which we find no countenance
in any statistics which have come down to us. Smith’s Diary,
is, on this point an important, if not unique document. Though
it seems to stand alone, its testimony is as frequent and precise
as could be desired in any reason, or as the case could well
admit. Years are repeatedly noticed at short intervals, as
marked by a want of seasonable rains, in language, which,
though of necessity less precise than a modern register of
temperature, is yet altogether distinct and unequivocal. No
one can read the Diary attentively without a full conviction that
long and severe droughts were a hundred years since, as now,
the great trial of the patience and confidence of the New Eng-
land farmer. Thus, we find such dry spells noticed as occurring
in the following years, between 1743 and 1762, inclusive, a
period of just twenty years, 1743, 1746, 1747, 1748, 1749, 1752,
1754, 1757, 1761, 1762, being ten years out of twenty.

As we have derived the greater portion of our agricultural
knowledge from English writers, and almost all our cultivated
plants from English gardeners, we can scarce avoid comparing
at every step, our own climate with that of England, and on the
slightest acquaintance with the subject, are struck with the
great contrasts which exist between them. These are generally
known, and may be stated briefly as follows :— ’

1. Much more rain falls, annually, in New England than in
most parts of Great Britain,* though the impression of common
observers is probably the reverse. This difference may be
more precisely understood from the following comparison of
the fall of rain in twelve months at Chiswick, near London,

* I say in most parts of England. ‘We are told in a Prize Essay on the English
climate, (published in the Journal of the Royal Agricultural Society, 1850,) that in
some of the western counties, the mountainous district of Cumberland, for instance,
fifty, a hundred, or even a hundred and twenty, inches of rain sometimes fall in
the course of the year. Asa general rule, nearly twice as much rain falls on the
south-west part England as in the neighborhood of London.

NEW ENGLAND CLIMATE. 153

taken from the registers of the Horticultural Society, and at
Cambridge, Massachusetts, as stated from the American Alma-
nac. I have selected, for the first statement, the year 1836,
which seems to have been an uncommonly rainy year in England,
and for the second, the twelve months from May, 1847, to May,
1848, merely changing the order of the months. Rain in incheg
and decimals.

Chiswick, Eng. Cambridge, Mass.
January, . : sie ASSL, Je é oo one
February, . : 3 Wve Glia 3 ae
March, : ‘ ae. Siac; Mite F of Meee
Co : si gee OF iE ye ; is’ (eles
1 : sph SE Oiliay a8 E : BOSS

SUTURE crocs (lt . Ai MAO BI 3 . dA91
<i ae : i poe ; oi eee
August, . : are ol ES eee ; | One
September, : eee) mee ; | -6:536
October, . . ipsonoe ty. 7 . 1444
November, . 5 Spc OOd A . 4,940
December, : a yntl4ia bn ; . 4370

28.73 43.049

Yet nothing is more common than the remark that our climate
is a drier and brighter one than that of England, and this is
perfectly true. Their rains fall in moderate and drizzling
showers, while ours are more violent, and are followed by fair
and cloudless days. To this frequency of rainy days, and the
great rarity of the blazing weather which we often experience
during our summers, for weeks together, is England indebted for
the deep emerald green of her verdure, which we should in
vain strive to imitate. In return, our bright summer suns give
us a striking advantage over England in the raising of fruit.
The apple, pear, peach, cherry, and plum can be raised in the
climate of New England, as far north as Boston, on standard
trees. Artificial modes of training are, with very few excep-
tions, not considered as worth employing, while in a large
portion of Great Britain, there is not one of those trees except
the apple, which does not require, or at least will not amply

20

te sh
roan hy

154 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

repay such artificial facilities. If Duhamel is right in his
unqualified assertion, that fruit raised on standard trees is
decidedly better than the same fruit raised in any other way,
and his authority on the subject of fruit trees is of the highest
order, the fruit of this country must surpass that of England in
flavor as well as in abundance. Such seems to be the fact, so
far as specimens of the fruits of the two countries have been
compared, (though it must be admitted that such comparisons
have not been very numerous or thorough,) and such is certain-
ly a probable inference, if we admit the position, to say the
least a plausible one, that the juices of all vegetable products
derive their highest flavor from the rays of the sun.

2. The temperature of the winter in every part of England is
unquestionably much higher than in Massachusetts. With some
very rare exceptions, i. e—about once in a generation, the zero
of Fahrenheit may be considered as the minimum of the ther-
mometer at London. In the year 1830, which seems to have
been considered at that place as an average year, the mean
temperature of the following months was :—

January, .°. 31.15° February”). sdisgie
March,. . . 48.33 December, . . 35.49

The average temperature of the same months for forty-three
years at Salem, Massachusetts, deduced by Dr. Hale from Dr.
Holyoke’s Observations, (Transactions Am. Academy, Vol. 1,
New Series,) was as follows :—

January, . . 25.59 February, . . 27.75
MAPCE, Oc. BOLOS December, “. " .” B0!29

Thus we perceive that near London, the temperature of the
coldest month of the year is barely below the freezing point.
Accordingly, we learn that in England proper, the ground is
often sufficiently open for ploughing during the whole year, an
operation very rarely practicable in the vicinity of Boston
during any portion of the months of January or February. As
the year advances this difference of temperature in favor of
England disappears, and in the month of May the average heat
of the weather in the environs of London and of Boston, is nearly

NEW ENGLAND CLIMATE. ; 155

the same, or about 56° Fahrenheit. In the summer months
the excess of heat is on the side of New England, and that
to a higher degree than may be generally supposed. Thus,
in the summer of the year 1827, which I have selected as an
unusually warm one in England, the average height of the
thermometer at Chiswick was in June, 61.7, July, 67.7, August,
63.3, while, according to Dr. Hale, the average temperature of
these months at Salem for forty-three years was, by Dr. Hol-
yoke’s Observations, June, 67.19, July, 72.49, August, 70.53.
In September the excess of heat continued to be on the side of
our own climate, and the thermometer generally stands on an
average about 5° higher with us than at London, and in Octo-
ber the temperature of the environs of Boston and London
is very nearly on a level, or at about 52° of Fahrenheit.
In November the balance again inclines in favor of London,
the average temperature there being about 43°, and that of
our own November about 40°.

Thus it would seem that our autumnal temperature approxi-
mates much more nearly to that of England, than our vernal,
since at the autumnal equinox, our temperature is probably a
little the higher of the two, while the average, heat of the month
of March, at Salem, is about 35°, and that of London may be

safely estimated as between ten and twelve degrees higher.

From the greater intenseness of our summer’s heat and winter’s
cold, the earth, and consequently the atmosphere, recovers more
slowly—so to speak—both from the one and the other, than in
England. From this excess of heat in summer, and deficiency
of it in winter in our climate over that of London, it may
naturally be conjectured that the one is nearly a counterpoise
to the other, and that the average heat of the whole year at
London and Boston, and in their respective vicinities, is not very
different. Such seems to be the fact, as nearly as sucha fact can
be ascertained; the average heat of the year at London being
estimated at about 49° Fahrenheit, and that of Boston very near-
ly thesame. It results from the greater coldness of our winters,
that our spring begins, on an average, three or four weeks later
than in the neighborhood of London, and those who quit Eng-
land in March or April, and arrive in Boston after a passage of
a month, sometimes find the vegetation in the one country, pre-

156 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

cisely at the point where they left it in the other. So thor-
oughly, as already stated, is the ground cooled by our severe
frosts, that it requires the action of the sun for several weeks
after the equinox, to call our trees into full life. But such is
the heat of our May and June, that vegetation, when once fairly
started, advances with rapid strides, and by the middle of June,
our growing season is probably on a level with that of the
south of England. We find that many of our fruit trees which
blossom, generally speaking, two or three weeks later than
those of the same description near London or Paris, ripen their
fruit at about the same time. Thus, from observations made
for several years near Cambridge, in England, it appears that
cherry trees which flowered, on an average, April 14th, ripened
their fruit June 27th—by no means an early period with us.
All seasons, early and late, says the late Mr. Lowell, are nearly
on a level, on the 10th of June. “It is familiar to every one,
that in Russia and Canada, the seasons are as forward as ours,
by the beginning of July.” Midsummer probably occurs at
precisely the same time throughout the whole of the northern
temperate zone.

3. The most striking circumstances, however, which dis-
tinguish the climate of every part of our country from that of
Great Britain, are our fierce extremes and the sudden and
extensive changes of our temperature. The zero of Fahren-
heit has been stated as the minimum of the thermometer at and
near London. Putting out of the question, however, extraordi-
nary seasons, this minimum may be fairly placed ten degrees
higher. With the same qualification, the greatest degree of cold
in the vicinity of Boston, may be fixed at about ten degrees
below zero; being twenty degrees lower than the London min-
imum. ‘This degree of cold is reached or approached in our
vicinity almost every year.

We very rarely pass a winter which is not distinguished by
a few days of extreme cold, by which is meant, days on which
the mereury sinks below zero. The number of these days
varies, rarely exceeding five or six, and averaging three in a
season, and they often occur in immediate succession. Few as
they are, they are amply sufficient to test the hardiness of our
trees and shrubs, for it is not likely that any plant that could

NEW ENGLAND CLIMATE. 157

endure two or three days of such weather, would sink under a
longer continuance of it. This occasional degree of cold alone
would be sufficient to deprive us of many of the shrubs which
ornament the gardens of every part of England. But our
winters would probably be far less dangerous to vegetable life
if our climate, severe as it is, were more uniform. On the con-
trary, it deserves any other title. The average range of our
thermometer in the three winter months of December, January
and February, is not less than sixty degrees, while that of a
London winter is less than forty, and the change in the course
of one of our winter days, sometimes amounts to thirty degrees.
The difference between the greatest degree of heat and cold in
our spring months, (March, April, and May,) the most critical
of the whole year, so far as vegetation is concerned, is not less,
on an average, than seventy-four degrees. When these facts
are considered, it will seem much more surprising that the list
of exotics which habitually endure our winters should be so
large as it is, than that we should be compelled to exclude
from this list so many of the ornamental plants of Europe.

Our extremes of heat are equally striking as those of cold.
They occur with equal suddenness, and with more frequency.
The number of days in each year in which our thermometer
rises above ninety degrees, a heat all but unknown in England,
is not less on an average, than ten annually. These occurring
as they do near midsummer, produce much less effect of a per-
manent kind upon vegetation, than days of extreme cold, and
are of little moment to the farmer or gardener, except as they
serve to increase our summer drought.

No country, however, is entirely exempted from these extra-
ordinary visitations of severe and changeable seasons, which
overleap the usual boundaries of heat and cold, and occurring
as they do, once, perhaps, in a score of years, destroy in
many instances the growth of a generation. Such a season
occurred in England, in the winter of 1837, which, for the
greatness and suddenness of its changes, might fairly be
denominated a New England winter. This resemblance must
give additional interest to any full and accurate account of its
effects on the vegetable kingdom, and such an account has been

158 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

given by Professor Lindley, in the London Horticultural Trans-
actions, Vol. 2, New Series.

Whether any winter as extraordinary, all things considered,
has occurred in New England, we have no sufficient data for
ascertaining. The cold summer of 1816, was, however, an
instance of equally rare and extraordinary deviation from the
usual course of our seasons, and if not unexampled, has cer-
tainly been since unparalleled. It is probable that every
period of twenty or thirty years has exhibited, with a very few
if any exceptions, all the varieties of which our seasons are
susceptible. Much of this able paper of Professor Lindley, is,
as might be expected, principally interesting to English garden-
ers, but there are some deductions which may be drawn from
it of a more general character, and applicable to our own, or
any other climate. Professor Lindley’s statements go far to
overthrow the position of Mr. Knight, that the English winters
have softened during the last century. The thermometer is
stated by Lindley to have sunk in many places of the counties
of Kent and Middlesex from three to thirteen degrees below
zero, and at Chiswick, it stood at 44°. Had Mr. Knight
lived to that time, it can scarcely be doubted that he would
have seen reason for a great, if not entire change in his im-
pressions. There is, I believe, no instance on record of a
degree of cold materially greater in the southern part of Eng-
land. This paper clearly shows, or rather strikingly illustrates
thé fact, that extremes of temperature, especially those which
occur suddenly and last but a little while, are often confined
within very narrow local boundaries, and that the heat or cold
of places within a very short distance of each other, may vary

exceedingly at any given moment. The temperature of any

spot is materially affected by large objects, natural or artificial,
within the immediate vicinity, and so great effects are produced
by the radiation of heat on the one hand, and by shelter on the
other, that we often find thermometers in different parts of the
same city or village, or even of the same garden, differing several
degrees. Mr. Daniels states (Horticultural Transactions) that
he has known a difference of thirty degrees of temperature be-
tween the top of a hill of moderate height, and the valley at
the foot. Not the least interesting of the facts observed this

NEW ENGLAND CLIMATE. 159

winter, says Lindley, was this: that in those places where the
cold was very severe, the more plants were exposed, the less
they suffered, while the more they were sheltered without being
fully protected, the more extensively they were injured. Of
this, he proceeds to give several striking instances. Had he
experienced a few of our changeable winters, he would scarcely
have thought the fact extraordinary. It seems to be a settled
principle that all tender plants which can bear our winter
weather at all, are safer in a northern exposure than any other;
and that the winter’s sun is, with respect to all those plants
which are called half-hardy, far more dangerous than the winter
frost.

It is impossible to read Lindley’s Essay, without being con-
vinced that much of the devastation which it commemorates,
was owing, not to the actual severity of the cold alone, but to
the fact that this cold was preceded by an uncommonly warm
winter. The cold was certainly such as is rare in any part of
England, but in all probability, as Lindley himself intimates, far
from unprecedented. But the preceding weather had kept the
fluids of the trees in activity, and the sudden check was suff-
cient to test their powers of endurance to the utmost. Lindley
himself does not seem to adopt this conclusion, or, at least,
to state it distinctly, but rather to consider the actual degree
of cold as the prime and sufficient agent. Doubtless, there is a
limit in every exotic to its power of enduring cold, however
prepared by the previous state of the weather. But when we
find that our hardy ash (frazinus Americana) was severely in-
jured by a temperature of four and one-half degrees below zero;
while with us it seldom passes a winter without experiencing this
degree of cold, and is often called to meet one much more
severe, it seems impossible to deny that no injury would have
occurred, had not the tree been strongly and unnaturally ex-
cited by the previous warm weather.

On the subject of acclimating plants, that is of rendering a
tender species hardy by repeated raisings from the seed,
Professor Lindley’s language is very decided on the negative
side. Acclimating, says he, in the strict sense of the word,
seems to be a chimera, and quotes the bean as a plant which
has been raised from the seed in cold climates for centuries,

‘

160 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

and is still tender. An individual plant, however, may unques-
tionably be brought by judicious protection to endure a climate
very different from its own. I have seen two beautiful silver
firs flourishing near Savannah, which for some years were regu-
larly screened by close boarding from the summer’s sun, till at
length protection became unnecessary. This paper of Lind-
ley’s is one, which, for the precision and fullness of its state-
ments, as well as the fairness of its reasoning, may serve as &
model for records of Horticultural Observations. From many
obvious causes, meteorological investigations can serve only to
mislead, unless made extensively, repeatedly, and accurately.
Thermometers, in this country at least, are seldom insulated
with any care from surrounding objects, or protected from the
direct or reflected rays of the sun; and it is only by comparing
the statements of many careful observers, that we can arrive
even at an approximation to an accurate idea of the temperature
of a large district at any given time. Moreover, the observa-
tions of the meteorologist must, like those of the astronomer,
be continued for ages, before we can hope to discover, to any
considerable degree, the mysterious laws which regculate the
distribution of heat and cold. To the practical farmer or
gardener, indeed, it is of much less moment to discover the
causes of the leading peculiarities of our climate than to obviate
their effects. One or two suggestions to that effect will close
this Essay. So far as respects heat and cold, a farmer has but
little power over the fierce and sudden extremes of our season,
beyond the limits of his frames and greenhouses. He can
only protect a few favorite shrubs by covering, and choose a
proper exposure for his fruit trees.

But there is one striking feature in our climate, the long
spells of dry weather, to which allusion has already been made,
and the effects of which, no exertions should be spared to al-
leviate. One of the most obvious remedies would be irrigation.
But very few of our farmers have the means at hand for water-
ing their land upon any regular system, to say nothing of the
high cost of the labor | ecessary to apply those means.

Another expedient, which has been little practised hitherto,
but which seems fast coming into general use, is the breaking
up of the soil to a great depth, more especially by subsoil

NEW ENGLAND CLIMATE. 161

ploughing. In countries where labor is cheaper, the same
object is effected by the spade, which indeed not only divides
the under soil, but brings it to the surface. But the expense
of this course, which in Massachusetts would probably be not
less than fifty dollars per acre, would be considered by many as
an insuperable objection. Besides, if the under soil is brought
to the surface, a heavy expense must be incurred in addition, in
the manure necessary to enrich it. The same objections may
be made to the enormous trench ploughs, used in England, but,
it is believed, scarcely known here, which completely reverse
the soil to the depth of a foot and a half, and thus place the
cold and barren subsoil uppermost. The only subsoil ploughs
used with us are those which merely split and break up the
hard pan beneath, and thus produce a bed of light earth of
about sixteen to eighteen inches indepth. This can be effected
in the stiffest soil by a subsoil plough, with four stout horses,
or an equivalent force of oxen following in the wake of a com-
mon plough, and the cost will not exceed twelve or fourteen
dollars per acre. When once done, it may be considered as
permanent. Every one knows that the hardest ground, when
fairly broken up, is loosened for many years, and nothing but
the constant travel which takes place in the most frequented
streets or roads can restore it to its former compactness for a
long period. By this opening of the under soil, the roots of
plants are enabled to shoot downward, and this they will infal-
libly do when the surface is parched by drought. Besides,
every one knows that a heap of loose earth conducts the heat
of the sun off much more slowly than a compact mass of hard
soil, to say nothing of the superior power which it probably
exerts in extracting from the atmosphere its hidden moisture.
If we thus open a refuge to our plants from the fierce rays of
the sun, we shall find that none, whether trees, shrubs, grain,
or grass, will fail to shoot down their roots, as far as they find
the way open.

The next expedient for alleviating the effects of our weari-
some spells of dry summer weather is, mulching. This expedient
can be practised to much less extent than that just mention-
ed, and must be a resort, rather of the gardener than the
farmer. With crops of English grain, it is manifestly impossi-

21

162 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

ble, and for field culture, generally impracticable from its
expense. But so far as a farmer is a raiser of trees, it may be
of the greatest service. Young trees especially, are not only
benefited, but often actually saved, by a cover of leaves or
litter of moderate thickness placed round the foot to the
distance of a few feet. The roots of the tree are thus effect-
ually shielded, and enabled and invited to spread themselves in
the soil near the surface, which is of course the richest. Ifwe
vo into a forest or grove, and sweep away the bed of leaves
which we find lying round the trunk of a tree, we shall generally
find many of the roots actually lying on the top of the ground.

A third expedient, and perhaps the most effectual and useful
for obviating the effects of drought, is the frequent stirring of
the surface soil. This can never be done without essential
benefit. It would be going quite too far to say that it completely
supplies the want of rain, but it is certain, that in some way or
other it produces effects which no one would suppose before-
hand, and which no one who has ever attempted to test the
point by experiment, will ever question. Whoever stirs a
few feet of dry soil, will find that it soon changes color and
gathers moisture from whatever source, or in whatever mode.
Wherever this measure can be resorted to, which is of course
only in places where the plough or hoe can be used, it will be
found far more effectual than any other remedy which can be
applied with the same amount of labor. The latest and most
popular French writer on Horticulture points out the mulching
and stirring of the soil as the two leading remedies against the
droughts which visit all parts of the globe frequently, and our
own country in a preéminent degree.

As no human power can change our climate, and as there
seems no prospect of any amelioration of its severe winters or
its parching droughts, it is an obvious dictate of common sense,
to select such plants for cultivation, whether annual or peren-
nial, as can best resist its fierce extremes. On this point, little
or no information can now be given to New England cultivators.
The experience of two centuries has rendered any precepts
unnecessary, and our great agricultural staples are precisely
those, which, if the choice were now to be made, a wise cultiva-
tor would select at the present day. Of these, the best adapted

NEW ENGLAND CLIMATE. 163

to our climate, as well as our wants, is Indian corn. A few
bushels of this grain which had been stored away by the
natives, and were found by the Pilgrims before they landed
on Plymouth Rock, may be called the first fruits of their new
land of promise. Since then, the various merits of this most
useful as well as beautiful plant have ever been most justly and
wisely appreciated, and the twinkling maize field, as it has been
elegantly called by Bryant, has always formed the most striking
feature in our field cultivation. Another of our best native
poets denominates this vegetable:

The plumed maize with shapely blade,
That stands like martial host arrayed.

And certainly no plant of the grain kind stands up more manfully
under our fierce summer heats. It only begins to wilt when all
‘our other crops have drooped, and the curling of its thick and
glossy leaves, is a symptom of a drought of the last degree of
severity. For a century and a half, its grain was our chief
bread corn, and though now less in use as sustenance directly
for ourselves, it furnishes us with much of our food, as the best
grain for fattening animals yet known. But we have only
begun to appreciate the value of this plant in another particular,
namely, as green fodder.

Its worth, in this respect, was first brought into notice by
the late Col. Pickering, who states that it will yield for this
purpose more than ten tons of green food per acre. Still
further information on the subject may be found in the valuable
pamphlet on soiling, lately republished by President Quincy.*
When our grass is actually burned up by the dry weather, in
other words, in half our summers at least, this plant furnishes a
complete substitute to our grazing animals who prefer it to any
other food, and in all cases, whether the cattle are fed in the
barn or the field, forms a valuable addition which well repays
the labor bestowed in raising and reaping it. I cannot leave
the subject of our New England climate without a word upon
its favorable influence on the health of our domesticated animals.

* President Quincy states, p. 5, that two square rods of land will afford an ample
supply of green food per day for each head of cattle, without any additional food.
He recommends sowing in drills at the rate of three bushels per acre.

164 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

Our severe cold, which penetrates to our very firesides, has
compelled us, from the beginning, to house those animals in the
winter, while they, doubtless, suffer much in other countries
where the winters are sufficiently mild to allow them to be
exposed unsheltered without absolute cruelty, and yet not mild
enough to enable them to bear such exposure comfortably.
The practice, so general in England, for instance, of permitting
cattle to remain out during the whole of the year, is justly
censured by that eminent agriculturist, our late countryman,
Dr. Colman, as a most slovenly and unthrifty one. In our dry
summers too, our sheep and neat cattle seem in a great degree
exempt from many diseases which prevail in England, and are
ascribed principally to the damp weather. We accordingly
find that a race of cattle has grown up among us which, though
a very moderate degree of attention has been paid to them on
the whole, is highly distinguished by its valuable qualities in
every essential particular; and although the importation of
valuable foreign animals should by no means be discouraged, it
is far from certain that the best mode of improving our domes-
tic cattle is not by careful selections from our own stock. Our
New England climate, like every other climate on the globe,
often calls forth complaint and criticism from those who live
under it; but when we give it due credit for the great variety
and importance of the vegetable productions, whether grain or
fruit, which can be raised in the greater portion of the States
of New England, and for its proverbial healthiness, as respects
our farming stock, to say nothing of its far more important
effects in invigorating our farming population, we shall proba-
bly allow that it abundantly compensates us, even in an agricul-
tural point of view, for its violent changes, nipping winters and
parching droughts.

ia ge ae oo Lao

BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

6

9% Sse‘e | 9% SSe‘e = 00 068 00 068 OT 00S @ SIT a OS L& GL OST 00 009
90 Ost'8 | 63 TFI‘8 = € Eze | &0 9¢8 0% LIS GS ESG‘I | 9% GOT 00 &6 9% 68E 00 009
00 sere | 00 gels > 00 SLE 00 9IT 00 6¢e 00 €09'% | 00 8S0‘T | 00 6ZFT | 00 99 =
00 szt‘e | 00 Szt‘e = &0 £89 8% BSI cL S6P 0S fF = 00 FS 0S O6I 00 009
00 F69'ET | 00 082‘2Z | 00 F96'S | 06 SFIT | 06 GSS 00 66S 86 008% | SI @g9 00 OFT 08 gZZ 00 009
00 000°¢ | 00 000‘ | 00 000°%S| 00 009% | 00 00S os g99 00 0093 | 00 Sze 00 00s‘T | 00 Zt 00 009
99 eas‘oL | 99 g98'6 = €9 9FS‘IS| EI 999% | OS Osss | GI ScGT | 29 TE9 00 G9IS | ee Ze¢ 00 009
00 oos‘szs 00 o0s‘e% = F = = OF 1€9°%S | 00 96TS = OF Ste‘T$ | 00 009$
Lf

nee 8 8 8 as azo ae eS ZB E f 25 S B B Ee 5

ree Sa BES Rehr ak aS carats E> S e 2 S es"

|
|

‘Kyaro0g ortysdure Fy
* — ‘Kyaroog
uapdueyzy 2 uly

-yuri,y ‘orsdurezy

‘IO NY 19}89910 AA

Js9 AA 10}S90IO AA

‘{JOTI0G 19489010 AA

‘{joI00g XOSa[PPIPL

* — Kyaro0g xassiy
* ‘gmypnors

-DYy suyjoworg
1oy AJolII0g “ssVpT

“SULLAIOOS

“SHONVNIaA

‘6981 UOA SHLLAIOOS TVYALTOOIOV AO SNYOLAA

167

RETURNS OF SOCIETIES.

*09 ‘MOTJNINSUT SPUIAG o[quysuv_ Uy £039'TH ‘poos

Polap{suod Orv GOA Jo T[ve—suoszed Arpuns jo ‘puvy Jo se}0u U[—ALAINOOG ATAVISNUV
“QOL ‘Samngxg puv sued ! 0g ‘BoFIOULY YIAON Jo yuvg soivys g * OOS ‘avg yyNo uwtATT Saivys [1g

S0OLG ‘pvorpey youvig pop edvp spuog % S ocpes ‘sojou Arossrmoid }—*ALAINOOg HLAOWATI
06 [gh ‘(PUBY UO Ysvo $00F ‘OD Y sloyjoIg “tayoorD * OF9'T “TOS

jo Ajun0D oy} JO sojou ArosstuIoId $90Z'1TS ‘Yue woyunvy, selvys Z[—"ALAINOS TOLSIUG

“4800 4 “ox ‘on}IUIng ‘seinpxy ‘sued o]}}¥0 ‘Tey [BIN}[NOLSB ‘puvl UJ—"ALAINOG WIOAMON
*pUuNJ 94} 9yNzT}SMOO SajoU esoyy, *A[[VNUUB 4S91OJUT YIM

‘19 9T@ Ios oj,OU SI SAAIS JoquUINW You 4ysolozUl Teunuuv ‘so}ON—ALGINOS OINOLYSAOH

-Ajnoas [vuOsIed Uo SUBOT UJ—ALAIOOG AYINSMUA

“SoT}[inoas [vuOSIOd puv 0}¥}Se [BOL WO S95¥5}10Ul Lq poindes 809}0N—ALAINOS NITUNVAT

*O}v 183
]eor Wo go8e8}10ur Aq porInoos ATISOUL ‘SUINS SNOTIVA UT ‘puVY JO s9}0U U[—ALAIOOG NACANV IT
“e679 ‘pUBY UO YSvo ‘gg ZIG *}S9L9}UL WO SOM SLaquIoUM astT ‘ONE “ApPINIOS [Ritos.od
UO 4Sa10}UL Je sUBOT $YRe'ZH APLNdOS 0}7B}S9 [VoL WO JsaI0}JUL JB SULOT—ALMINOOS ANIISACVY A
*solqiinoas Peuor
-1od puv soSusyrou Aq pandas soJON—ALAIOOG NAGINVA ANV NITMNVAT ‘AUIHSANV IT
*£yol00g Jo asN LoJ 8} UdUTETduT] pu ‘stod 9[}4¥9 ‘pULT JO S9}ON—'ALAIOOS HLAO N WALSAITO AA
‘suad 913380 puv puvy jo So}OU U[—ALAINO ISAM WALSAOAO A
*goSv3}AOUL PUL S9JOU *YO0}s YULG U[—"ALAIOOG UALSAOUO MA
*goSvS}IOUL PUL ‘SO}JOU PUL “SPVOITIVI PUL ‘SYUBq JO SYI0}F—"ALAINOG XASATAAII
"O22 1B ‘AJOLNOg 03 Sulsaojoq Ayr0d
-o1d [euosieg ‘sesvsz1out Aq poinoas ‘sojou puv ‘spuoq ‘syo0j}g YuRg U[—'ALAIOOS xXussy
“‘syuvg W0}SOg JO YOO}GS—"AYALIOOUSY ONILONOU AOL ALAIOOG SLLASAMOVSSV AL

‘CALSHANI MOH—CNNd LNANVWddd

OL TIG'GOL| FE 918'%6| 68 E60FI| Ze FIOTS| 90 OSIIT| IT GF | eB TEV0E z B90 | of 9269 | €0 ce0'9 | 00 eaz’s |° SIO,

00 OFZT | 00 OFZ'T = 19 FOF | GL IST | Gh Gee | 09 S8h = 00 OL 09 &6 00 eee | ‘Ayoro0g arquisureg
00 os96 =| 00 oss’6 = es Los@ | ec cor | 00 988 | EI FOOT | TE 968° | 00 09 eB ZF9 | 60 C09 —_ * “Aqor00g yynourAT
06 1496 | 00 OFG'E = & SET | 86 18h | S@9SL | SL O4OT | SS oss | 00 6IE | 09006 | 00009 |" ‘Maroog postig,
68 GeI'9 = 68 6219 | S6 6eI'9 | S6 zes‘¢ | 00 GZz¢ | 08 899°9 | Og BGEF | 00 EST | 00 BEI 00 009 = | * SAjar00g HTOJIONT
ee seg'9 | sé cEe'o “ c9 LITT | $9 ee | 00 S98 | 09 S86 | 09 BE 00 £6 00 02& | 00 009 | ‘Aato0g otuoyesnogy
00 o0s‘e | 00 000‘ = 09 £96 | 00 86¢ | 0999 | 00998 | 00 O@t | 00 28 00 GOL | 00 009 | * “Ayaro0g outysyog
00 soz'eé | 00 892’e = = 70 eg «=| We ese =| ze gest | se zor | 0s tI9 |e FZ | 00009 |* “Aeog upjoug
00 o0g's | 00 098‘F = eo oct | Ge 789 «| ge ze | ge seer | 69 tor | 0s cor | GI Sst | 00 009 | * ‘ye100g uopdureyy

we

BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

168

|

| i ‘ , ‘ ‘Ma10g nap
00 IST - 00 eI - 00 OF - 00 6¢ - 00 OL uae a9: apse ae
00 &% - = “ = - 00 & - - * — *Kyat00g YWONT 19}S9010 AA
00 €9 00 @ 2 00 OT = = 00 9& aa 00 SI : ‘AO190g 489 AA 10}S9010 AA
00 0g 00 SI - - 00 SI - - - - | + + ‘Kyaroog 40989910 44
00 Fee 00 ST 00 €hS 09 0G - 00 76 i 00 cS : : ‘{yato0g XesalPpI yl
00 9tE8 00 TZI$ + - 00 S$ zs 00 OLIS = 00 0z$ : : ; ‘Kyato0g xassy
i — = x = | - + mynonsy Saynou
= F: = 3 | Q-01g 10} AJaID0g syasnyoussepy
pC ae Bg Fas ws Ee $ g Boers —
Reese | te 2 9 BS 2 Bo rd ) dg
oe ie ie ae “Be e8 ¢ s ee
maple | Bice 2 S BS 2 | eat g
Be | B Bo eB i=, S

99) ‘SINNUVA DOA

‘GaadudVMV SHILINLVUYD ANY SWOINDUd AO SISAIVNV

‘6981 UOA SHILAIOOS TVUNLTOAOIDV AO SNUALAY

169

PREMIUMS AND GRATUITIES.

ee ee SS Se Ee eS eee

00 Pzs‘I$

00 ¥6
00 16
00 88
00 191
00 OOT
00 69
00 0€
00 S9
00 6éI

00 Eres

————

00 ¥

00 IgI$

00 91

00 9
00 FI

° >

[eIoL,

‘fya100g aquysuleg

> ‘Kyar0g yynourd| g

> — {Kyato0g Josug,

* ‘Kyato0g Y[QION
‘fya100g d1UOJesNOFT R

* ‘Kyatoog aitysy tog

* ‘Kyatoog ulyuesy
“‘Ayoro0g uapdurexy

‘fya1o0g aatysduepy

BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

170

os OLE
00 I6L

OS O&P

os F8I
00 £66
00 GéP
00 Sh

GL 98Vs |

"49018

AAV] Joy popivar

|
te

yUNOWIG [B}OY

SMOOLS WUVA XO

00 26 | 00 0 | 00 6t | 000r | 0s t9 | 00 TS | 009T | 00 08 | 0096 | 00 2%
oo st |009 |006 |o00€t | 001m | 00 LT | OO gE | COS | DF | O09
00 FF | 0S 86 | 008 | 00S | 0068 | 00 TE | 008 | 00 BB | 00 OTT | 00 &
o¢ se | 002 | OS F OIE NSE | 000E 00% | 0OSE | 00 FE 09 0%
0068 | 00 IT | 000 | 00Fe 00S | 00SF 00 0F | 00 46 | 00 SE | 00 6%
00 9 | 00 | 00 FT | 00¢e | 00 Fe | 00S | 00 6 | 00 0S | 00 9F | 00 EF
00 FE | 00 et | - | 0008 | 00€% | 00 8~ | 00ce | 00% | 00 0% | 00 SF
00 se$ 00 £88 00 TIS 00 S8G 98 S98 | ee GCS FH GS | 00 GIS | 00 ses 00 128
| oe eres

Pee Ee ae ee ee re ee
| § 5 : aa ere | es

eee Kees - a ae ie

a | : Ree

; : * ‘Kero0g uepdueyzy
: : * ‘Kyaro0g asrysduinyy

‘{yoroog uap
-duw py 2 ulpyarsy ‘ouysdwepy

° §AyaI00g Y}AON A9j]SVIIO AA
A ‘fyato0g 4sa AA 1a}S9DIO AA
, : * ‘Kyarv0g 19}s9010 AA
. . * (fya100g xesa[pprpl
. ‘£91009 xossy

° * ‘ginyJnousy Suyow
-O1g ioy Aaroog syjasnyoussepy

"SULLATOOS

‘dHONILNOO—QAGUVMV SALLIALVYD ANV SWOINAYd AO SISATIVNV

171

PREMIUMS AND GRATUITIES.

Ze IsP‘r

00 OcI
00 LE
00 8&&
00 0c&
00 19&
00 98&
cL 196

OS €8&

GL €S6

98 1¢Z

00 81
00 &&
00 TZ
00 €S
00 T9
00 99

00 7S

PP 866

009°
00 0&
00 T%
00 €S
00 VE
00 9f
os 9

00 96S

00 FI
00 &
00 &P
00 G2
00 G7

00 99

00 &&

° . *[e}0,7,

‘Ajal00g a[qe}suleg
‘{jato0g yynowd[g
‘Aqolo0g [OSM
‘£yO100g YTOJION
‘{jato0g dIUO}esNOTT
‘fyo100g allysylog.

‘fyatoog ullyuesy

BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

aseoyQ pus s9}ng

172

- leat--° looe loose os coe} - joe | - foos| - | - | - [006004 oo er | ‘Arerooy oxmsdoreRy
* — *Kyat0g
00 IT 00 €&6 OS TIT | ~ (00 ST ze ba = oa Se 00S = r “0 — (00 aT uapdweyy 7 uly
AOL Y Pd -yuely ‘aisduezy
- Tl S€ |19 8 - |4p98 [FL |Seoso0cszes IITs F in = - 00 ¢ 00 9 00 GL ‘£00 "Ni 423,210 AA
= 00 ‘AL i= = 00:6 (00 € |--~ - 006 0098) - = = - 008] — 00 OT | ‘420g *MA 40388910 (4
= a = - (00 IL = s - (oOIt|] - = - - - - - - ‘{JAIIOG 19}S9dIO AA
09 Fes 00 69 00 86 | ~— (00 Fe “gl = - (006 Fe = = - = se - (00 ST | * ‘Aya1o0g xeso[pprAl
3 ‘dal 89$ 0008 - (00988 (0098) - - |00 98] - - |00 9 - - (009%) - 00 cI ° ‘Kyaroog xessy
8 30a yu
8,W1d0eds . . ‘giny[notd
=, < = = = a = = = 2 = - _ - - - - -DY Suyowoig
Joy Ajat00g “ssefy
eI | ri > be 5 i) 5 bd | fe) ie) >) > | [atest
: on ae) 3 Re ~ 3 : & 3 a |Be s - 2
Be ipaece tar ai i. Se ol ce vee | ae & 3 ‘SAILAIOOS
2% Eee s ee lee : °

‘SLONGOUd WAUVaA AOA

‘d2ANIINOD—CAdUYVMV SHLLINLVYD ANV SWOINHUd AO SISATIVNY

173

PREMIUMS AND GRATUITIES.

00 €6€00 TOT

00 ¢
00 OS

00 9S |
"Dg Aou0y)

00 OL

98 919

cZ Il @ IT
00 SZ 00 €€
00 LOI SZ T€
00 09 00 c&
00 19 00 €
00 8@
$4 WL OS T

00 66 SZ IG

96 GI600 &

., Sjiodey Jyoy} PIeinjos you oAvY sdo1H jooy puv UJ¥IH WO 00}}{UIMIOD OTL ,, +

L6 6GL

CLL
00 TEI
00 0@

9€ 0E |

00 96,00 &
(00 S€00 OT

00 €9

00 Sit

00 €
00 6E |

00 €9

. e107,

> ‘Kyatoog a[quisuleg
* ‘yaro0g yynow sg
* — {Kyatoog osug
> — ‘kya1o0g HOJIONT

‘fya1o0g o1u0zesnoyy
* ‘Katoog omysyiog
> ,{Ajaroog ul[yuely

> ‘Kyar0g uapduezy

. 174 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

RETURNS OF AGRICULTURAL SOCIETIES FOR 1853.

MISCELLANEOUS.
eo. | ebg | Peeleere
Bae Bue Bos |BBE
SOCIETIES. £8 a . Ze eee
pee | Eee | 22a [sce
ga E& 8 Bes |¢ eee
< <4 = PA =i
Massachusetts Society for
Promoting Agriculture, . - - = -
Essex Society, . : : - - $111 50 147
Middlesex Society, . - $12 00 - 37 50 125
Worcester Society, . < - $69 00 - 74
Worcester West Society, . 11 00 = 34 75 66
Worcester North Society, . 1 00 1 00 58 95 103
Hampshire, Franklin and
Hampden Society, . : 17 00 - 154 25 184
Hampshire Society, . : 14 50 33 75 41 85 213
Hampden Society, . - 21 00 3 50 132 50 116
Franklin Society, : . 1 00 ~ 50 75 200
Berkshire Society, . : 14 00 ~ 96 00 150
Housatonic Society, . 5 00 700} 118 00 228
Norfolk Society, . : ; 21 00 10 00 51 00 67
Bristol Society, . ; : - - 115 50 239
Plymouth Society, . : - 617 00 269 00 136
Barnstable Society, . : 3 00 | -

40 67 | 47

aie... . | BIRD | $741 25 | $1,312 7 2,095

jects.

PREMIUMS AND GRATUITIES. 175

Names of Towns and Cities in which Premiums and Gratui-
ties for agricultural objects were distributed, and Amount
to each.

MASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR PROMOTING AGRICULTURE,

Amount paid to Dr. Slade, for a course of Lectures on the Horse, $600 00

Paid Thomas Motley, Jr., Esq., for care and keep of the Society’s

Alderney Stock, . ; - A : 5 ; , : 460 74
Paid for Premiums to the Treasurer of the National Exhibition of
Horses, at Springfield, . < - ; 3 : : : 250 00
Miscellaneous, . é : ; ‘ : : A ; - 45 62
Total, z ; ‘ - - , : _ $1,356 36

ESSEX SOCIETY.

Andover, . : é - $209 47 Lawrence, : ; - $118 50

Newbury, . 2 - . 88 26 Lynn, : : - . 5 50
West Newbury, : » peeto0 Middleton, ae + aidan
Danvers, . : : . 185 50 Salem, . : } . 388 50
Georgetown,. . : . 384 50 Lynnfield, . : - - 50

Marblehead, . : . 18 50 Boxford, . : : 7 44

Bradford, . : ‘ «| ile eee Wenham, . : , 3 00
Methuen, . m : - 47 00 Newburyport, . ‘ . 7 00
Topsfield, . ; : = 40) Amesbury, : : F 50
Groveland, : ; cg + plea UO Rowley, . , : é 5 00
Haverhill, . , ; s 8 50 | ae

Total, . $882 12
Beverly, . j , Poser n (07/5) |

= =

176 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

MIDDLESEX SOCIETY.

- $8 00

Ashby, Melrose, $50 00
Acton, 29 50 Pepperell, . 2 00
Bedford, 6 00 Shirley, . . 6 50
Boxboro’, . 4 00 Sudbury, . 19 00
Cambridge, 13 00 Tewksbury, 10 50
Chelmsford, 10 50 Waltham, . 25 00
Concord, . 191 00 Watertown, 8 00
Dracut, 11 00 Wayland, . 20 50
Framingham, 36 50 West Cambridge, 5 00
Lexington, 24 50 Weston, 1 00
Lincoln, 22 50 Wilmington, 44 00
Lowell, 34 00 Be AnOe:
Total, . $589 00
Marlboro’, . 7 00
WORCESTER SOCIETY.
Auburn, $36 00 Princeton, . $52 00
Barre, 99 00 Shrewsbury, 17 00
Boylston, . 10 00 Southboro’, 18 00
Charlton, . 24 00 Sterling, - 400
Grafton, 39 00 Sturbridge, 19 00
Holden, 25 00 Sutton, 46 00
Leicester, . 14 00 Templeton, 4 00
Millbury, . 4 00 Warren, 8 00
New Braintree, . 25 00 West Boylston, . 18 00
Northboro,’ 13 00 Westboro’, 20 00
Oakham, . 6 00 Worcester, 74 00
Oxford, 1600 | Total, $591 00

PREMIUMS AND GRATUITIES. 1TT

WORCESTER WEST SOCIETY.

ae. eC ee OD North Brookfield, . . $12 00
Hardwick, . : s « 45 00 Templeton, ° : . Je oo
New Braintree, . : « 4400 Hubbardston, . “ - 10
Petersham, S t - 38 00 PARDO, a) let ts : 6 00

Princeton, . c : «4.21.00 Dana, 3 : - 4 00

Bhillipston, . . _ «1400 Dotal,. . ww peed

WORCESTER NORTH SOCIETY.

Fitchburg, 2 : . $139. 09 Winchendon, . 4 - $1 50
Princeton, . A = s 32 2 Sterling, . - - » Wa
Royalston, : = pon 00 Leominster, . F 5 2 50
Mveemminster, .- . #8299! | Ashby, *. ©. ~. * 7 See
Phillipston, . . wu 15-00 eae

Total, .. ; 4 - $298 70
Ashburnham, . 4 7 37

HAMPSHIRE, FRANKLIN AND HAMPDEN SOCIETY.

Northampton, . F . $199 40 Conway, . : se - $8 00
Hadley, - .« : - 149 00 Chesterfield, . : - 20.00
South Hadley, . ‘ - 1 00 Norwich, . Fi o “ah deOd
Hatfield, . 3 3 - 94.50 Whately, . F - «ee 00
Southampton, . « bidet Ase 06 Williamsburg, . : 0 nt OG
Easthampton, . : = 8 00 Cummington, . - Oa aes
Goshen, . ‘ 7 2 6 60 Amherst, . é , - 1500
Belchertown, . i : 9 00 Sunderland, . A F 8 00
“nby, -, «, + yeneioneer 00
Memeelds) ley] 00

Total, . - - $663 90

23

178

BOARD OF AGRICULTURE,

HAMPSHIRE SOCIETY.

Amherst, . A . $186 74 Montague, ; $1 00
Belchertown, . 8 00 New Salem, 6 25
Boston, ony eeu Northampton, . 14 37
Conway, . 2 00 Pelham, 11 50
Cummington, 5 00 Prescott, . oe
Deerfield, . Handy (0.0) Shutesbury, 2 00
Easthampton, 2 00 South Hadley, . 14 00
Enfield, ° : 5 00 Sunderland, . 113 00
Granby, 15 00 Wendell, . 1 00
Hadley, . 97 24 Williamsburg, . 3 00
Hatfield, . 4 00 De aT
Total, - $500
Leverett, . o C8EBHO0
HAMPDEN SOCIETY.
Springfield, 4 . $245 75 Chicopee, . : - $37 00
West Springfield, 130 50 Southwick, 18 50
Wilbraham, 57 75 Montgomery, 3 06
Longmeadow, 54 25 Awes
Total, . 8598 75
Westfield, . a2 00 |
FRANKLIN SOCIETY.
Greenfield, : $68 25 Coleraine, . $4 50
Deerfield, . ‘ 59 87 Heath, . ‘ : 4 00
Conway, 18 47 Rowe, . - v 1 00
Shelburne, 128 25 Leyden, . 8 00

PREMIUMS AND GRATUITIES. 179

FRANKLIN SOCIETY—Conrinvep.

Bernardston,- .- . . $9 00 Shutesbury; "=", ee

Gill, . . - : - 142 Montague, . ; ... oe
Northfield, : Sin. Noe, Spe ee Sunderland, . . .” ia
Warwick, . . - A 3 00 ag >

otal, s.\ ss) so ie Saree
Orange, . : = : 3 00

BERKSHIRE SOCIETY.

Adams, . - - - $13 00 Lenox, . A - ‘ecaier SOOGR
Williamstown, . - - 22.00 Stockbridge, . 3 - 388 00
Cheshire, . ° . «/ | F400 West Stockbridge, . - 25 00
Lanesboro’, F - - 9400 Great Barrington, . - 500
New Ashford, . + @ OO Egremont, . oe Se gieaie
Hancock, . : 5 : 5 00 Monterey, . ; : 8 00
Richmond, 4 : - 41 00 Sheffield, . f - - 45 00
Dalton, . - “ - 1500 West Marlboro’, a 1 00
0) a aa as 2 00 Becket, . : 4 - 13800
Hinsdale, . rs - 15 00 —-, . cre oe - 1200
Pittsfield, . ch) ens R800
Lee, . ‘ ‘ « oon 00

Total, . ° - « $813 00

HOUSATONIC SOCIETY.

Great Barrington, . . $220 00 Richmond, 3 : - $34 00
Sheffield, . “ 5 - 170 00 Lee, . = : : - 2200
Eigremont,, . - «. 164 00 Alford, (6.3). De ee
Mimipey,. . <« «dh 00 Westfield,,. « « «*0RanGd
West Stockbridge, . . 48 00 Sandisfield, . « ., 8300
Lenox, . < - 4400 Pittsfield, . ‘ s e 3 00
New Marlborough, . . 40 00 Salisbury, (Connecticut) . 2 00
Stockbridge, . . . 4000 Total, .) <> is 11s Seen

180 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.

NORFOLK SOCIETY.

Bellingham, .. - $2 00 Quincy,
Braintree, . Btls iy’ - 56 00 Roxbury, .-
Cantoh, . 3s 9's - 21.00 West Roxbury, .
Dedham, . : 4 s) noe eo Sharon,
Dorchester, _ = . 96 00 Stoughton,
Dover, . : - - Al 00 Walpole, . °
Medway,. -. .- . 45 00 Wrentham, .

Medfield, . - Hs - 66 00 Cambridge oe
Milton, . - : . 74 50
Needham, . : < . 64 00

Attleboro’, : - - $45 00 Norton, .
Merkley, . i» . .e 41/20 (25 Rehoboth, .
Dighton, . : A 8 00 Raynham, .

Easton, . s : 3 8 00 Seekonk, .
Fairhaven, x A ous e000 Somerset, .
Fall River, : oi Sa. ROOD Taunton, .«
Mansfield, . - : +, eereo
New Bedford, . ‘ » 20 50

Abington, . : - . « 82 50 Hanson,
Bridgewater, . wiih ie. eee Marshfield,

Carver, . : : piece bs Bet North Bridgewater, .

East Bridgewater, . . 45 50 Duxbury, .

$16 00

° sodel Qh 5G

100 00

3 00

7 00

2 "22°00

« 23°00

non-residents, : 3 00

Total, - $749 00

BRIS LOL. SOClh twee

- $85 00

. 22 75

° 88 50

- 14 50

Ls e Q4 00

* 249 75

Total, . $640 75
Pinay M OMe SOG thy.

$13 00

. 3 50

oe J138es

- 23700

3 25

Eiglifam= . . . -»- . 2000 Kingston, .

_ PREMIUMS AND GRATUITIES. _ 181

PLYMOUTH SOCIETY—Conrinvep.

Lakeville, . “ : » $10 00 Rochester, ; H <0) BO550
Middleborough. . . 8075 Wareham, . es) oa
Pembroke, . ‘ - 932 00 West Bridgewater, . - leeg

Plympton,. . . « 20/00
Total; 5 9» 0. |S @0Seiee
Plymouth, . : : ‘ 6 00

BARNSTABLE SOCIETY.

Barnstable, F : - $116 25 Chatham, . - . - $6 00
Sandwich, . : oe) 2250 Orleans, . : : 4 3 00
Yarmouth, . : - 4200

Total, : 2 - $182 75
Dennis, . : . : 4 00

Notre. An error occurs in the statement on page 116, of the aggregate income
of the fund of the societies. It should read $6,025.03; while the aggregate re-
ceipts on the same page should read $30,251.82. An error discovered in the
returns, makes this correction necessary.

The foregoing Tables are made up of the original returns. Owing to a slight
misconception of the blanks furnished to the officers of the societies, two or three
instances occur in which expenditures are placed under the wrong heads, as for
instance, on page 168, under the head of Ploughing, the Worcester Society awarded
$58 at the ploughing match, which appears in another part of the returns.

r 1 iho ii

. ee a’ its my TK

enna %
cours cul teas

re a

- faint . y wiee LT 3

; rae tt me 20 YROLaER ;
x

HIS LeU

rae &
Tee ee GD op CREon) 2
i Ty fechas ok,

ae ek: sy
py Gouge: (tit goin thie oars
; mn sPagar’s b seh eet ji he » ndtv
mlaet Art : ae 7 qi Bam 16. ” ink ese
toy avhadtedeile we wrulahesnish bdsm itt gg '
arc on ath shi nay.”

‘

ir wie ro ep “Sid ony Pn if ule ab New
ee en ee re Lables sits» itv an ig ‘
: 0 Bis ?
is, <i Yi vers mu bots oT Moker BA Pose, Moe Br Te: Bi ug ia . ;
‘ ji « (oonewy wt Orit Stot8

25 BOR, y f

: ae
et i SVR
ema h | ‘to watog |, is
* ob) iantowst

. a

how verdad ‘
- ‘ ib ¥r
. Do quveidt lowinay
wtintnuoll bos dandity hh

Page

Abstract of Finances, : : - : ‘ 3 - 5 116, 166

Agricultural Implements, . ° ° : . . ° ° . . 3

a Statistics, importance of, ° . . . . . ° 17

OL Clubs, . c : : . é A ° c - : 100

we Library, ° : ° ° ° ° . . . : 101

“ Societies incorporated, . : - . . 2 4 | 10s ete

to ‘* management of, . . . . . ° . 103

Agriculture, Board of, established, . : ° s “ : 5 ° 15

se 0) 6 in Eneland,, ©. . ° . . . . . 10

ss French Bureau of, - - “ : : : S = 17

66 History of, in Massachusetts, : : é 4 fe S21

a Encouragement of, . . . . . . : - 12, 115

«“ Indian, . - - - - “ ° o = = ° 4

Barley, average yield of, . : - . - . . . . . 31

«¢ decrease of, . é - - : ° . . ° F 32

Barn Cellars, . - : : A 6 - A 4 A . ‘ 78

Barns, number of, . “ A 2 ° . . ° ° . ° 80
ss Indian, . ¢ 5 - : ° E ° ° . ° °

Beets, nutritive value of, . : cC - 5 ‘ : . 35

Boston before the Revolution, . - > : = : ° ° . 8

Broomcorn, amount raised, : : : P - “ s A : 60

Carrots, yield and nutritive value of, . c . c é 5 3 : 35

Cattle, first importation of, “ b - a c : - 5 eh!

“¢ price and favorite color of, in the Colony, . . . ° . 2

«¢ increase in weight of, . ° ° . ° ° ° ° ° 3

“¢ improyementin, . . . ° . . . e . . 81

“‘ points of perfection in, . : . : . . ° . : 104

«© treatment of, . 5 Py - . a A : “ é 10

Circular, . : ; 4 c 2 - a - 2 17

Seemeaiivew Bnelatd,, << « ss $$. = « .@ 6 147

Clubs, Farmers’, value of, ° . : - ° - - 101

Corn, Indian, . - 6 C - * . ° . ° . ° 19

Cows, number of, . c - C : : : : 4 ° : 81

Cranberry, natural history of, . “ - ' fs - : ‘ . 42

“c Highbush and Mountain, “ A . ‘ ° : : 43

184

Cranberry, origin of the name, .

se analysis of,

“ cultivation of, .

“ time of planting the,

as yield of, .
“ varieties of,
“ worm, .

es mode of gathering the,

Devons, points of,
Durhams, “ ‘“

.

Education of the Young Farmer,

Eliot, Rev. Jared,

Embargo, influence of,
Essex Society, report on,
Experiments, want of,

“ discredit of,

Farmers’ Clubs,

«© Institutes,
Farming, profits of,
Farm labor, 5

Finances, abstract of,

Flax, amount raised,
«© demand for
“« soil adapted to,
Fruit first raised,

‘* increased culture of,

«* interest in,

«* in Essex County,

Harris, T. W., M. D., extract from letter of,
Hay not used by the Indians,

*¢ necessity for,

«amount raised, and average yield of,

s‘ increase of,
«© wet meadow,
aFBalt,. 5
“6 value of,

Heifers, number of

Hops, amount raised,

Herefords, points of,
Horses, number of,

Horsford, Prof. E. N., Analysis by,

Humphreys, Gen.,

Improvement of Pastures,

.

.

Page

64, 66

109

Indian method of storing”grain,

com, |. >’. : A

“ ** amount raised,

es “average yield of,
ae “mode of planting,
<i) Barns; .« .

Indians, farming of the, .

Labor on the farm, .
Land, tillage, . ;
“ ss decrease of,

“drainage of,
Lands, reclaimed, .
Larch, Scotch, 5 :
Library, Agricultural,
Livingston, Chancellor, .

Locust, Yellow,

Manures, importance of, .
ae mode of increasing,
6 loss of, é “

Merinos, first imported,
Newspapers, .

Oats, decrease of,
Oxen, number of,
“ improvement of,

Pastures, improvement of,

“6 number of acres of,
Pear Tree, Endicott, .
Pine, culture of,

“transplanting the,

Ploughs, want of in the Colony,

«© Indians surprised at, .

66 form of,
Pork, profit of raising,
Potatoes, statistics of,
«© ~~ disease of, .
* nutritive value of,
Poultry, . é ‘ ‘
Premiums, awarding of, .

Reclaimed Lands, statistics of,
Report on the Essex Society,
as “6 «6 Middlesex ‘
ac ‘© << Worcester **

6 «« « Hampshire, Franklin and Hampden Society,

24

.

°

185

Page
6

4, 15, 19

>

>

°

19
20
22
6
4

68, 70
69, 70
42
G2

93

103, 122

66
121
124
126
131

186 INDEX.
Report on the Franklin Society, . .

« ss «¢ Berkshire, «

“ «¢ « Housatonic, = -

6s ss 6s 6Bristol “6 : =
Root Crops, value of, Z
extent of their cultivation,

«“ “
« “in England, .
~ 6 “

yield of,

Ruta-Bagas, nutritive value of, .

Rye, statistics of, . : - : “
eS profit of, . - : .
«decrease of,

Sheep, number of,

« with cows,

«© breeds of, , . : A
Ship, Indians surprised at,
Settlers, condition of,

oF adopt the Indian mode of cultivation, .
ce disposition to move of, .

« ideas of, : A
Societies, agricultural, established,

« influence of,
aid to,
G management of, .

Steers, number of,
Steel, process of casting,
Stock, A
« judgment of,
«¢ for special purposes, .
«* importance of good,
Swine, number of,
“breeds of,

Transactions, Agricultural, distribution, of,
Tobacco, mode of cultivation,

Whieat, statistics of, .

“ introduced, .

ss yield of,

se profit of,
Winslow, Edward, imports cattle,
Wood-waxen, . :
Woodland, increase of, . A F

“J ; . 10, 1
12
12

. 2, 10, 81, 83
. 104

: 85

86

90

91

16
61

a
WBE! AY iN

i

Hl

LS

Cate)

J +
uojyoes “OS ALpOlT J UPYLA

TOlaT JO THVa NOAA

1g NptadOutyf

aZldd id

CAA

8 dd

THE

AGRICULTURE OF MASSACHUSETTS,

AS

SHOWN IN RETURNS

OF THE

AGRICULTURAL SOCIETIES,

1853.

PREPARED BY

GH AKG EB Se Eel Tee,

Secretary of the Board of Agriculture.

BOSTON:
WILLIAM WHITE, PRINTER TO THE STATE.
1864,

‘tla

ie a me Me
tes Ala a
HED Dake i eines
Psy i “punilenal
| i tant) ae tibial
re aa,
Ay nse ‘om 3 a

PARE RACE

THE materials of which the present volume is composed
are of unusual value, and the societies were probably
never in a more flourishing condition than at present,
all but four having published their Transactions.

The distribution of its volume of Transactions is one
of the most efficient means which a County Society has of
awakening an interest in the subject of Agriculture.
One great object of such society, with the aid of the
bounty of the Commonwealth, should be to create an
interest where but little exists, and no society can attain
its highest usefulness, which has not vitality enough to
publish, and to obtain a general distribution of its pro-
ceedings. It is believed that the expense of publication
would be both judicious and economical, even if its
Transactions should be placed in the hands of every
farmer in the county, whether a member of the society
or not. It is wholly impossible to give any society the
credit and position in this volume which it may deserve,
unless its returns are properly made.

My thanks are due to the State Society and to the
individuals who have kindly furnished me, at their own

iv PREFACE.

expense, with the plates of valuable animals which adorn
this volume. It is desirable that all first prize animals
should appear here. An accurate likeness gives a far
better idea of a good animal than any description can.

The arrangement of this volume is somewhat different
from that of any which has preceded it, and it is thought
that this, together with the complete index at the end,
will make it more valuable and convenient for reference.

The financial returns of the societies will be found in
the Appendix to the First Annual Report of the Secretary
of the Board of Agriculture.

C. L. FRIIS
Boston, April, 1854.

OFFICERS OF AGRICULTURAL SOCIETIES FOR 1854.

MASSACHUSETTS.

President—JOHN C. GRAY, of Boston.
Secretary—BENJ. GUILD, of Boston.

ESSEX.
President —MOSES NEWELL, of West Newbury.
Secretary—ALLEN W. DODGE, of Hamilton.

MIDDLESEX,

President—SAMUEL CHANDLER, of Lexington.
Secretary—SIMON BROWN, of Concord.

WORCESTER.

President—ISAAC DAVIS, of Worcester.
Secretary—W M. S. LINCOLN, of Worcester.

WORCESTER WEST.

President—DAVID LEE, of Barre.
Secretary—EDWIN WOODS, of Barre.

WORCESTER NORTH.

President—IVERS PHILLIPS, of Fitchburg.
Secretary—THOMAS R. BOUTELLE, of Fitchburg.

HAMPSHIRE, FRANKLIN AND HAMPDEN.

President—P AOLI LATHROP, of South Hadley.
Secretary—W M. O. GORHAM, of Northampton.

HAMPSHIRE.

President—ALFRED BAKER, of Amherst.
Secretary—J. W. BOY DEN, of Amherst.

HAMPDEN.

President—FRANCIS BREWER, of Springfield.
Secretary—A. A. ALLEN, of Springfield.

vi

OFFICERS OF SOCIETIES.

FRANKLIN.

President—HENRY W. CUSHMAN, of Bernardston.
Secretary—H. G. PARKER, of Greenfield.

BERKSHIRE.

President—JULIUS ROCKWELL, of Pittsfield.
Secretary—ENSIGN H. KELLOGG, of Pittsfield.

HOUSATONIC.
President—EZRA C. TICKNOR, of Alford.
Secrelary—SAMUEL B. SUMNER, of Great Barrington.

NORFOLK.

President-—MARSHALL P. WILDER, of Dorchester.
Secretary—EDWARD L. KEYES, of Dedham,

BRISTOL.

President—J. H. W. PAGE, of New Bedford.
Secretary—L. 'T. TALBOT, of Taunton.

PLYMOUTH.

President—SETH SPRAGUE, of Duxbury.
Secretary—J ESSE PERKINS, of North Bridgewater.

BARNSTABLE.

President—CHARLES MARSTON, of Barnstable.
Secretary—GEHORGE MARSTON, of Barnstable.

EXHIBITIONS FOR 1854.

Essex, .
MIDDLESEX, .

W oORCESTER,.
Worcester WEST,
Worcester Nortn,
Hampsuire, FRANKLIN AND HamppeEn,
HAMPSHIRE, .
HamppeEn,
FRANKLIN,
BERKSHIRE, .
HovsaTonic,
Norro.rx,

Bristo1,

PLymouTH, .

BARNSTABLE, : 5 :

September 27 & 28.
October 4&5.
September 27 & 28.
ee 27.
cs 13.

October 18 & 19.
September 27 & 28.
October 4& 5.
c\ 4&5.
September 27 & 28.
26 & 27.

Ag 27 & 28.
October 4&5.
s 11.

f
vt

rf

Leah? ee 4

;
ei Py

ree me A lal ‘Ks 7 Sn Acad
f t A Go Ak i" Grae ' Ae e, ae

AM 4 Anse Bol

iw ‘na

. a “aie meres io"
itch 3 ae Breen meer se ys ¥
‘ teal, “aa alk WAY 9 vo ony.

;

<1] a ‘
hs Mil yo
oh get Wa a + Ws ., .
Se Maulsby bib. iarey prc deen dy 99
eS ee Pala be Scene: abs,
ve is be) ye eise ee ;

‘ Me
Le hs

a?

49 map <? 4 bite Fy ve “) Melber. «
hd > Aa ha

AGRICULTURE OF MASSACHUSETTS.

PA EMSs.

The committee of the Norfolk Society suggest the propriety
of adopting some known standard of judgment to be used by
committees on farms. The following is suggested by them as
worthy of notice :—

Requisites and Evidences of Good Farming.

Ist. A good soil, well tilled, and kept free of various weeds,
both on the fields and the roads.

2d. Lots well fenced, and suited in number to the size of
the farm.

3d. Substantial and convenient barns and stables of sufficient
dimensions to contain the produce of the farm, and to comfort-
ably house the cattle kept on it.

Ath. A judiciously arranged dwelling, in neat condition, with
a well and filtering cistern.

5th. Convenient buildings to facilitate the economical man-
agement of the farm; among which may be enumerated a wood-
house, a wagon and tool-house, a workshop, a granary and
corn-house, a convenient piggery, an ice-house, ash and smoke-
house, all secured against decay by being well raised from the »
ground and neatly painted or whitewashed.

6th. Convenient yards attached to the barns and stables, so
arranged as to prevent waste of the liquid manure, well
sheltered from the blasts of winter, and provided with water
for the cattle.

1*

2 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

»

Tth. Door yards laid with grass and flower-beds, and shaded
by ornamental trees, indicating to the passer-by the dwelling
of taste, health and comfort.

8th. A kitchen garden highly cultivated, and containing every
species of vegetable that can be raised in our climate, with
strawberry and asparagus beds.

9th. A fruit garden or orchard, where choice apples, cherries
and plums are carefully cultivated, and where can be found neat
rows of raspberry, gooseberry, blackberry and currant bu.hes.

It will be seen, also, that the propriety of increasing the
amount of the premiums on farms, and extending the entries
over a term of years, during which the whole operations of
the farm would be under the inspection of the committee, is
strongly impressed upon the attention of societies.

ESSEX.

The committee would suggest to the trustees the expedi-
ency of revising the mode of offering premiums on farms; and
they beg leave to propose the plan of entering farms for a
period of not less than three years, to be viewed, as now, twice
each year, and the first premium to be $100, and the second,
$50. To your committee it does seem important that some
revised mode should be adopted, which it may be hoped will
increase the number and grade of farms offered for the society’s
premiums.

Ricuarp P, Waters, Chairman.

Josiah Crosby's Statement.

In calling your attention to my farm, I feel some reluctance,
in consequence of the very prevalent idea among farmers, that
none but large and decidedly model farms should be considered
worthy of a premium. But notwithstanding this opinion,
experience and observation have taught me that small farms
declare the largest relative dividends; and in corroboration of
this statement, I could, if my limits would permit, cite many
instances of farms in this county, containing ten or twelve acres,

FARMS. 3

that are made to produce annually a larger net income than
others containing one hundred acres.

In conformity with these views, I have ventured to offer my
humble farm for a premium, destitute as it is of all such pleas-
ing associations as “ paternal acres,” “ancestral oaks,” or “ven-
erable mansions,’ handed down from former generations; and
I present my claim only upon the ground that he is a benefac-
tor who makes two blades of grass to grow, where but one
grew before. I will endeavor briefly to convince you that this
much I have done.

I purchased my farm in the spring of 1841; it then con-
tained about thirty acres, one-half of which was completely
covered with bushes. My first move was to commence an open
warfare upon these “cumberers of the ground.” For a while,
they resisted manfully, and seemed to bid defiance to our
attacks; but after a hard-fought battle, we found ourselves at
last in full possession of the field. This field is now the best
part of my farm, and is capable of producing two tons of Eng-
lish hay to the acre; but at the time I commenced work upon
it, it would not have afforded subsistence for a solitary cow.

The other half of the farm at the time of my purchase, was
a strong and rich, but cold soil, and for want of sufficient drain-
ing and manuring, it produced but scanty crops. It has been
partially drained and had a liberal supply of manure. It is
now in a good state of cultivation, and produces large crops,
but is yet susceptible of great improvement.

I have made several additions to my first purchase, and the
farm now contains about sixty acres, all of which—with the
exception of sixteen acres of woodland—is in a high state of
fertility, and with a little additional draining and manuring,
will compare favorably with any similar number of acres in the
county.

Ihave built a barn and cellar fifty-six by thirty-eight feet,
with sheds, carriage-house, piggery, poultry yards, &c., attached,
which have cost about $1,700; I have entirely remodelled and
repaired my dwelling-house, at an expense of about $2,500; I
have built a small greenhouse, with a cellar and well, for rais-
ing foreign varieties of grapes, which has cost about $160; I
have made two hundred rods of substantial stone wall, and

4 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

have dug three hundred ‘and fifty rods of drains; I have set
out about three hundred fruit trees, comprising the choicest
varicties of apples, pears, peaches, plums, cherries and apricots ;
I have hauled at least five hundred loads of sand a distance of
a mile and a quarter, which has been spread upon the land, and
is now thoroughly incorporated with the soil, and has changed
the character of it, preventing it from baking or cracking
during severe droughts, and causing the crops to start much
earlier in the spring; I have paid out in cash for manures about
$500, and have made various other minor improvements on the
farm.

But, as I have before stated, I do not enter my farm for a
premium on account of its magnitude, or as being a model farm
on a small scale; neither do I claim any superior mode of cul-
tivation; but simply on the ground that I have taken it in a
miserably dilapidated and worn-out condition, and have put it in
such a state that it will compare favorably with a majority of
the farms in our county.

The following statement will show the comparative condi-
tion of the farm when purchased, and as it now is :—

Produce of Elm Vale Farm in 1841 :—
Say about five tons of hay, worth B 4 : $75 00
Produce of the same for the year 1853 :—

25 tons English hay, . 5 $20 00 — $500 00

3 “ squashes, . : 40 00 120 00
25 bushels onions, : : ; 60 15 00
Boo)“ . potatoes, §. : 2.1100 350 00 «
2,500 heads cabbages, . : : 06 150 00
60 bushels oats, . 3 ; 4 60 36 00
ee. corn, . : : + OO 40 00
25 barrels apples, : : . 3 00 75 00
Tomatoes, cucumbers, melons, green corn and peas, 35 00
Cherries, pears, peaches, quinces, &e., ; ; 25 00
Pork, fatted mostly upon milk and refuse potatoes wana

apples, : ; : ; ; ; : . 90 00

Calves, . : : e . : : : L308

$1,454 00

FARMS. 5

No account is made of butter and milk, garden vegetables,
fruit, &c., used in the family.

Original cost of the farm, . Sf i : $2,900 00

Cost up to the present time about, , : 10,000 00

Farm expenses for 1853, —.. 5 : : 516 00

Exim Vate Farm, Norra Anpover, Noy. 15th, 1853.

MIDDLESEX.

In the discharge of their duties, the committee have visited
the remotest sections of the county; they have, therefore, had
excellent opportunities to observe the general aspect of our
agricultural towns, and to ascertain, somewhat critically, their
condition and prospects in regard to agriculture. One opinion,
and the same feeling, seem to have been common to us all while
engaged in our investigations. Taste and labor combined are
every year making our beautiful county still more beautiful ;
so that ere long the poet will cease to be quoted when he says,
“God made the country.” The traces of enterprise, skill and
perseverance, are becoming as manifest in the fields and around
the rural homesteads, as in the cities; so that neither city nor
country can now claim to be, exclusively, God’s work. His
sunshine falls on both, and in both alike the blessing assumes
many beautiful shapes.

It may be said that with a liberal outlay of eal any farm
may be made beautiful. Very true, provided the money be
judiciously, and not foolishly expended. And this leads us to
throw in a remark based upon what we have repeatedly seen.
We are persuaded that farmers still need to learn where to
spend, and where to pinch, in conducting their operations; in
other words, to ascertain the point up to which money spent
for the farm is good economy, and beyond which, expense
becomes extravagance. It is no economy at all to save the
expense of a good plough, for instance, and to lose twice its
cost, in a crop made scanty by poor ploughing.

By such economy, the poor farmer is made still poorer; his
“poverty” as the Scripture says, “is his destruction.”

We were pleased with the combination of the useful and
ornamental which we saw in Mr. Wheeler’s cornfield. It sug-

6 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

gests a theme of great practical importance. As the progress
of agricultural science and art is promoted among us, these
combinations will become more and more common. Taste,
insinuating itself into the operations of the farm, will often
avail itself of some accidental feature of a field, or some
chance location of trees, or shrubs, or water, to make them
subservient to the general beauty of the landscape.

CuarLes Baspipcr, Chairman.

In order to obtain as full information as possible from those
applying for premiums on farms, the committee propounded the
following questions :—

Replies of Daniel Tuttle, of Acton.

1. Of how many acres did your farm consist in 1848 ?

A. Ninety-five acres.

2. What was the condition of the land at that time, in a good
state of cultivation, or otherwise ?

A. Mostly bound out and up to brush.

3. What proportion of it was in tillage, pasture, and wood?

A. Tillage, thirty acres; pasture, fifty; wood, fifteen acres.

4. What amount of hay cut in 1848 and in 1852?

A. Twenty tons in 1852; twenty-six tons in 18953,

5. What grain do you raise ?

A. Corn and oats.

6. What roots do you raise, and what value do you place
upon them as food for stock ?

A. Flat turnips and carrots, and I believe them profitable as
feed for stock.

{. At what time do you seed down grass land, spring or fall,
and at about what date; kind and quantity of seed, and with
what grain best ?

A. In the spring, eight quarts herds-grass, half bushel redtop
and eight pounds clover to the acre.

8. At what time do you apply top-dressing to grass land, and
why at that particular time ?

A. In October.

Se

FARMS. . 1

9. How do you apply manure, composted, or not; ploughed
under or on the surface, and what quantity per acre ?

A. Composted, and thirty loads to the acre.

10. Do you use guano, how, and with what results ?

A. Do not use it.

11. The same of plaster and lime ?

A. Have not used any.

12. Whatcourse do you pursue in draining—open or under-
drains, use tiles, stones, or brush ?

A. Open drains.

13. What depth do you commonly plough—do you use the
subsoil plough, and think it advantageous or not?

A. Ten or twelve inches.

14. Have you reclaimed bog meadow, and how ?

A. Yes, by ploughing.

15. How much, and what live stock do you keep, and what
breeds ?

A. 'Two oxen, ten cows, one horse, ten swine, native stock.

16. Do you employ oxen or horses, and which do you consider
best ?

A, Oxen and horse.

17. How much butter, cheese, or milk do you produce ?

A. Butter and cheese, nine hundred lIbs., made and sold.

18. What fruits do you raise ?

A. Apples, peaches, pears, plums, and cherries.

19. What do you consider the cheapest fences ?

A. Stone wall.

20. Do you consider the careful cultivation of a garden essen-
tial on a farm ?

A. I do.

21. Is there profit in raising swine ?

A. I think there is.

22. What extent of orcharding have you, apple, pear, peach,
or plum ?

25. What distance from each other do you set your trees?

A. Thirty-three feet.

24. Do you wash them, and if so, what with ?

A. Yes.

25. Do you keep them under cultivation, and with what crops ?

a“

8 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

A. I do, with corn and other crops.

26. Do you think old orchards may be new topped and culti-
vated with profit ?

A. I do, but think they should be cut closer to the body to
prevent them from being too tall.

27. Do you keep a journal of your farm operations ?

A. Do not.

Elijah Wood, Jr.’s, Statement.

The farm, in part, which I offer for premium, I purchased in
1840, it being in a low state of cultivation, with a large propor-
tion of pine plain land, which had been cropped to death with
rye. The buildings were very poor and inconvenient. The
main house had been thoroughly repaired, new put up, making
a convenient tenement for my father and myself. The barn has
been built anew. The first year after the purchase, all the
stock that could be kept in the winter on English hay, was five
cows and a horse, and that, a share of it, was cut where the
cows are pastured now. Since that time I have added some
140 acres; about equal proportions of meadow, woodland, and
light pasturing. The pasturing has all been ploughed and
manured, except the last, purchased in 1849, and that comes in
turn next year. I plant with corn one or two years, as the
case may be, ploughing from seven to eleven inches, according
to the depth it was before turned, and the nature of the soil,
endeavoring to run a little deeper every year, spreading on
from twenty-five to thirty-two loads of compost manure to the
acre, and plough again (if sod land) as low as can be without
disturbing the sod, (if not) make one turning answer the pur-
pose. I have this year used the swivel plough to avoid the
dead furrow. I prepared a compost for the corn-hills, never
more than 300 lbs., of guano for the six acres, (this year only
150 lbs.,) with about four proportions of plaster. All the ashes
made in the house, and excrements from twenty hens, are mixed
with two loads of loam, and thrown over every day till used,
when but a small handful is put in each hill. The crop is hoed
level three times, sowing before the last hocing, six quarts of
herds-grass, one peck of redtop, and five lbs. clover. If exclu-

FARMS. 9

sively for pasturing, I sow three or four lbs. of white clover.
In that way, I have raised for five years an average of not less
than forty bushels of sound corn to the acre. If the grass
fails, in part, I scatter more seed in the spring and bush it in.
When it is to be grazed, the cows are kept from it till it gets
a good start, sometimes a foot high. Nearly all my hich land
has been laid down in that way for twelve years, because of the
saving of labor. My pasturing is in four lots, and I am con-
vinced of many advantages in the division. More stock can be
kept, by one-eighth, on agiven number of acres; and by keeping
on each, one week at a time, when you come to the fourth the
grass must be fresh and large, and the cattle are quiet and
peaceable, which is not the case when in one lot; J am a believer
in the old saying that a “change of pasture makes fat calves.”
Of stock, I made a small beginning, keeping but four cows
the first summer, and hired part of the pasturing at that; and
in the winter kept seven, partly on meadow hay. Now I keep
twenty-five head in the winter on the same number of acres
mowed over, and what land I have bought helps to increase the
number from thirty-seven to forty, with the additional purchase
of $30 worth of meadow grass standing. In the summer
I keep from fifteen to twenty cows, varying as my customer
wants milk, knowing that he must be supplied in August, when
the feed is short, as wellas in June, when it is green and sweet.
Moist land I depend upon entirely for grass, having turned
nearly all my high land to pasture except a few acres, an
orchard, where I raise all kinds of vegetables, southern corn,
&c. I am fully satisfied of one fact, that the more land a per-
son has (if he undertakes to cultivate and manure it sparsely)
the poorer he is. I have about thirty-five acres of the moist
land, twenty of which have been reclaimed, the rest. is on the
river, and liable to be covered with water one-third of the year ;
experience has taught me to let that alone. My great desire
was to improve the land—never being satisfied to raise only
my owncorn and potatoes; some four acres had been gravelled
by my father, but improvements on meadows in those days were
hardly known. The meadow was uneven, and not sufliciently
drained, all the ditches running from the edge to the centre,
not even one head ditch on the whole farm. The gravel in
2%

10 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

-”

some places was a foot thick and in others very shallow.
Draining and ploughing those pieces and incorporating the
gravel with the mud, were among the first of my improvements,
causing the land to produce two crops every year since. I
plough late in the fall, land that has been once fixed, and sow with
oats and grass seed the next June, because I cannot spare the feed
in the fall. New meadow should always be ploughed if possible ;
if not, gravel; never burn except to get rid of roots, or stumps,
or hassocks bogged off, and then gravel or level up with loam.
I have seen the bad effect of burning meadows on some of my
neighbors’ farms. Ashes produce great crops for three or four
years, and then it is ina worse state (ifnot heavily manured) than
before. Ashes in their effects are precisely like rum, exciting
for a short time. Some of the land that I have reclaimed was
very miry, requiring the plough to be drawn with ropes attached
to something permanent on hard land, other lots have been
gravelled in the winter when frozen.

Some three acres were completely covered with wood and
brush; the stumps were taken out, the heights were bogged off,
and burned, then loam and gravel from an old road spread over
it. The last lot that I reclaimed was very near the river; it
was covered with alder and skunk-cabbage, and so wet that
man or beast could hardly walk on it. Now, itis one of the
best pieces on the farm. Draining is the foundation of all
improvement in low land, and requires more judgment than
either of the other departments of farm work. Marginal drains
must be run, where, and how near together, is the question. I
have of that description, with stone laid in the bottom, and
covered, between five and six hundred rods, and one hun-
dred rods, with joist, and pieces of rails, and boards, in the
bottom. The first cost of covered drain is much more
than those of open, but after once made, more grass will
grow on them than on other parts of the piece; there is no
cleaning out to be done and they will last as long as the
present generation. We have in our vicinity hundreds of acres
of land, not mud, but black soil, where the water oozes out till
June, which, if it was taken off would produce twice the hay,
with the same manure, and that of a much better quality. If

FARMS. 11

stone is scarce there are other materials. Where there is a
will there is a way.

I have set three hundred and fifty trees of different varieties,
mostly apple, which are doing well, except the first hundred;
in that lot I was deceived, the seller not giving me the trees I
bought, viz.: large and well-shaped heads, but sent me crooked
trees and without limbs. I soon became discouraged, partly
on account of the poor trees, and on account of encroachments
and distance from home. ‘The land is now laid down to grass
and the few remaining trees will soon die a natural death, I
hope. Dear-bought experience has taught me that I had better
pay a dollar for a good tree, than to have a poor one for
nothing. By a good one, I mean one that has large and fibrous
roots, a straight trunk with the top well-shaped and trimmed,
and high enough to let the team near it. Of the whole number
all started but six, the first season, some few have died in the
hard winters, and peach trees from the effects of the borer.
Always mulched them the first year. I believe it no use to
undertake to raise fruit without the mind is made up to keep
the ground under cultivation at least two years in three. As to
manure, it has been my constant effort to make and use as much
as possible, from the barn-cellar, yard, hog-pen, vault, sink-drain,
&c., always using it the present season. I keep loam constantly
in the cellar which is ready to be put to the droppings. It is
always thrown over directly after haying, and used either for
fall seeding or for a top-dressing. Ithen commence a new pile
by wheeling loam into the lean-to through a door expressly for
the purpose and put it down the trap doors, and by so doing
the manure thrown over below can remain fora while. I used
as a top-dressing last year four hundred loads. Every thing
collected, up to November, is used on grass. I then commence
the winter stock by carrying one hundred loads of mud or black
earth to the cellar, and throw on to the droppings during the
winter as often as once a week. [I find it almost impossible to
make manure heat in my cellar, and for that reason I carry it
to the field to mix. I consider it one man’s time for the year
to do the work connected with the manure heap. When I
commenced on the farm little help was hired; but from year to
year more help was needed, and for the last three years in

12 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

summer have had three men and worked out more or less. In
this account no credit is given for labor of man and oxen which
were kept in winter drawing wood, stone and gravel for the
benefit of the farm

Receipts, in 1852 :—
Milk at the Car, : : A . . $1,573 75
Ruta-bagas and Carrots, . . : oie AL RO
For work off the farm, . ' ‘ ew, 211 OO
For Apples sold, . , : . : 49 00
Calves, . - , , : f - 36 00

$2,036 15

Expenses, in part :—
Labor of two men, . P i . $235 00
One man and boy three dale ; ined ASx100

For grass and hay, . : : : . 97 00
Expenses for grain, . é ‘ ‘ . 235 00

$645 00

Concorp, Mass.

Samuel G. Wheeler’s Statement.

In offering my farm for premium, I would state that it is only
three years the first day of this month, since I took possession
of it, and at which time, all the buildings were very old and in
a state of decay, and with the exception of the dwelling-house
not worth repairing. In the erection of my new buildings I
had regard to convenience in their location, durability in con-
struction, and beauty in appearance. You having examined
the same, can best judge how far I have been successful in my
labors.

The walls and fences on my whole farm were in very bad
condition, and my cattle had almost an uninterrupted range
over the whole place. I have laid about two hundred rods of
heavy-faced and bank wall, three hundred rods of heavy
balanced wall and about one hundred rods of chestnut post
and board fence. Ihave set out nearly two thousand fruit and
ornamental trees, and have so improved my whole farm by the use
of stable manure, meadow muck, and guano, that my crops this

FARMS. 13

year will be more than three times the amount of the first
year’s product. I have enclosed about eight aeres for a per-
manent garden, in which Ihave set out one and a half acres with
choice strawberry vines, also half an acre with nine thousand
asparagus roots, two years old, the balance in vegetables of all
the various kinds, and which will yield large crops. The two
fields of corn containing twenty or more acres, had no manure
put on the land. After the ground was furrowed for planting,
I put to each hill a table-spoonful of Mexican guano and plaster,
well mixed, one-fifth guano, four-fifths plaster. <A little earth
was put over this with the foot, before the corn was dropped
so that it did not come in immediate contact with the compost.
The upper field, which is a light soil, was hoed but once, owing
to hurry of farm work. I do not see but it is quite as good as
the other field and the product will be as heavy. From the
various experiments I have made for the last two years in the
use of Peruvian and Mexican guano, I have the highest opinion
of their great value as fertilizers. For some crops, I think
the Mexican equal to the Peruvian, and for any crops, I think
half of each, mixed with plaster as above, will produce as good
crops as Peruvian alone. The improvements made to my old
house, (part of which is one hundred and seventy years old,)
you have seen and can judge of their convenience. I would
not be willing to exchange it for any farm or mansion-house in
the State however costly it may be.

Concorp, October 4, 1853.

WORCESTER.

The farm of the Messrs. Meriam is all well cultivated, but
not so much better than many of our good farms as to justify
the awarding of a premium. But their improvements upon
swamp and meadow land present strong claims. Their state-
ments of their proceedings will accompany this report, and need
not be here repeated. The results, as stated by them, the
committee believe to be correct. The committee saw some
parts of their meadow land which had not undergone the pro-
cess of improvement, and some parts of their swamp land

14 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

which was in its original state. The former had not a crop on
it which would pay for mowing, and the latter produced nothing
but weeds and bushes. The Messrs. Meriam are worthy of
credit for their courage and perseverance, and have been
rewarded with great success.

ResoiceE Newton, Chairman.

Statement of the Messrs. Meriam.

Our farm, which we entered for the Society’s premium, con-
sists of 260 acres, of which about 85 acres are in mowing and
tillage, the balance in pasturage and wood. This year we have
about 25 acres in corn, wheat, rye, oats, potatoes, carrots, &c.,
and 60 in mowing. Our yield of corn will be this year about
75 bushels per acre, average for the last five years 60 bushels;
wheat 20 bushels, oats 33, rye 16, potatoes 100, carrots 500
bushels per acre. We cut this year, as near as we could esti-
mate, about 120 tons of hay, being an average of two tons per
acre; we had many acres that would yield three tons the acre;
and that on improved swamps and interval—having about seven
acres of swamp and twenty of interval improved. The interval
has been much improved by turning over and seeding down in
August or September. We have about forty acres of interval
and improved swamp land mostly in one body, to which we
have given most of our attention for improvements for the last
few years. To our other lands the committee -will see that we
have paid but very little or no attention, with a view to im-
provements, although it is of a kind and quality that would be
susceptible of great improvement with but small outlays, but
have confined ourselves to about one hundred acres, which we
think we are in a fair way to bring into a high state of cultiva-
tion with but very trifling outlays, as the most have paid the
expense of improvements the first year. Our swamps are
mostly got into mowing by planting with potatoes, and we have
obtained good crops, all but one year and that was lost by
the rot.

We find ourselves at a loss to make a correct return of the
expense of carrying on our farm, as much time of ourselves and
help is occupied in making improvements and work of the farm

FARMS. 15

particularly in the winter. We hire two men by the year at
$150 each and board them, (we do but little labor ourselves, as
our health will not permit us to do much hard work,) and in
addition, we hire by the day through the summer, about fifty
days at 85 cents a day and they board themselves. For getting
‘our hay and grain, we hire three men at $1.25 a day; about
twenty days each, besides our steady help, they boarding them-
selves. Besides the crops before specified, we have milk, butter,
egos, fruit, vegetables, and in fact almost every thing that a
farmer raises and has to dispose of, and which finds a ready
market at our door.

AvsBurn, October 24th, 1853.

P. 8.—The year before we came upon the farm there were not
more than ten tons of hay cut upon it, and a large share of that
was of poor quality; the first year after we came on to the farm
we cut some fifteen or twenty tons, about six of this was clover
that had been seeded down the year before, and for the balance
‘we did not get two or three tons to the acre, but it took two
or three acres for a ton, and much of that of very poor quality ;
and where we now get sixty bushels of corn to the acre, it had
been sown year after year to buckwheat until they could raise
nothing else.

WORCESTER WEST.

The committee were called to examine three farms, all
entered for the society’s premium on farms of 100 acres and
over. As but one premium was offered on farms of this
description, the committee were confined to the awarding of a
single premium.

The first farm visited was that of Mr. David Bacon of Barre,
and is the same for which he received the society’s second
premium last year. For a particular description of which see
last year’s report.

The only peculiarity in the management of his farm which
your committee noticed, was the stabling of his cattle and
horses on the ground, upon beds of dry muck and litter, suffer-
ing the cattle to stand upon the muck till it had absorbed its

16 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

fill of liquid manure, or till the accumulated heap required its.
removal.

Mr. Bacon is confident he derives greater benefit from this
method of making manure than he should from the use of a
cellar. He saves the expense of stable floors, retains all the
droppings of the cattle, and by the use of litter keeps his cattle
warmer through the winter than they would be to stand on
floors. This subject is worthy the consideration of farmers.

The last farm visited was that of Mr. Benjamin F. Hamilton,
of New Braintree. What he has done is stated in his commu-
nication to the committee, which is as follows :—

My farm contains 105 acres—six in wood, and ninety-seven
under improvement. The valuation on the assessors’ books is
$7,000.

The interest of which is, : d P . $420 00
The number and value of my Peas is—
One horse, . : ‘ : ; . $125 00

Two oxen, : ; ; 4 ; » 125 00 \
Twenty cows, . : , : ; - 600 00
One yearling heifer, é - ‘ a.) wh8= 00
Sevencalves, . : , : ; . 10 00
Four shotes, . : : : : - 40 00

$978 00

The interest is, : : : 58 68

Interest on cost of antabe repairing the
same, and blacksmith’s bill, : : 40 00
Amount paid for labor, . : 7 : 250 00
My own labor, : ; : : : 125 00
The labor in the house, . : ; : 110 00
$1,003 68

The produce is as follows :—
30 acres corn, 150 bushels, . : j ‘ . $150 00
4 acre of corn for fodder, . 2 : 30 00
& “ potatoes, 50 ‘aalels at 50 Re, ‘ ; 25 00
4 harley, 150 bushels, 4t 5 shillings, . » |) 124900
4 “ carrots, 75 bushels, at 25 cents, F ‘ 18 75

FARMS. 17

30 cart-loads pumpkins, : , é d . $45 00

Apples, : ; 5 ; > 25 00
55 tons good hay, a 15 dolliemy ‘ : : - 825 00
5 “ swale and meadow hay, at 5 dollars, . : 25 00
3 “ corn-stover, = é ; , ; ; 15 00
4 «straw, : 20 00
8,500 Ibs. cheese, at a frontion over 103 coats per Ib. 919 49
125 lbs. butter, at 22 cents, . : ‘ ; ; 27 50

1,883 lbs. pork, at 8} cents, . ‘ : . - 155 35
Small pigs, sold for : ‘ : 3
13 veal calves, i 97
Estimated value of erates of ae ehmeaical “6
family is, : : , : ‘ - . 250 00

$2,760 07

In the number of cows I milked were 2 two-years old and
3 three-years old heifers, and one farrow cow. Two of my
heifers lost their bags, so that I did not consider them both
worth more than one would have been had their bags not
have been injured. I have sometimes averaged 500 lbs. of
cheese from a cow, after fatting the calf.

I have expended considerable in improvements within the
last three years. I built a barn 100 by 42 feet, 18 feet posts,
with a cellar under the whole, at a cost of $1,700. The mate-
rials used were of the best kind, and the work done in a very
thorough manner throughout. I have expended on my house,
and buildings connected, including front fence, $1,000, and have
expended $100 in bringing water from the brook to my house
and barn, a distance of 26 rods, by a hydraulic ram. I have
paid $100 for blasting rocks from my mowings and fields, and
have built 237 rods of stone wall, at a cost of two dollars per
rod. My walls are very heavy. I have dug a trench from one
to two feet deep where I have ,built wall, for two reasons.
One was, I wanted the loam to fill the holes where I blasted
rocks, which was no small job, and to make compost manure
with. I have expended $25 in reclaiming about an acre of
meadow land, and have made it produce twice as much hay, and
of excellent quality. Ihave used about 300 loads of compost
manure yearly, and have increased my crop of hay fifty per

3*

18 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

cent. within the last three years. I have set about eighty
young apple trees, and fifty other fruit trees, such as cherry,
plum, peach, pear, &c. Ihave grafted thirty apple trees with
the best kind of fruit, and ten pear trees.

All of which is respectfully submitted to the committee.

New Brarntrert, November 21, 1853.

This statement, like all others which we have seen of farm-
ing operations, must be taken with a discount. The amount
actually realized from this farm does not probably exceed
$1,200 gross cash income, out of which actual expenses are to
be paid. All the balance of nominal income is consumed on
the farm. Your committee were of the opinion that the affairs
of this farm were managed with great system and care. LHvery
thing was in order; the stock was good, and the quantity and
quality of the products may be judged of by the price they
brought in the market.

But the attention of the committee was chiefly called to the
improvement made on the place within the last three years, or
since it has come into the hands of the present owner. In-
provements made for all coming time, and for all future
occupants of the farm.

The stones for 200 rods of wall—most of it more than four
feet wide—taken from the mowings and plough-fields, is so
much done, not only for the present occupant, but for all who
may come after him on the farm. The barn and other build-
ings, erected by him, are a model for all who wish to make
permanent, convenient, and—in the opinion of your commit-
tee—really economical improvements.

The committee, believing it to be one of the great objects of
this Society to encourage such investments, and such a system
of farming as Mr. Hamilton is pursuing, have no hesitation in
awarding him the Society’s first premium.

FREEMAN WALKER, Chairman.

FARMS. 19

.

HAMPSHIRE, FRANKLIN AND HAMPDEN.

From all the observations your committee have made, we are
satisfied that agricultural improvements are progressing within
the limits of our society; that the subject of making and saving
manure is better understood, and that a spirit of inquiry is
abroad among the farmers. We would say go on with your
improvements, and rest not satisfied:till you are entitled to our
highest premiums.

In awarding the premiums, the committee felt bound to be
guided strictly by the rules of the society, which read thus:
“For the best conducted farm with the most economical im-
provements.”

Paout Laturop, Chairman.
November 30, 1853.

Statement of Linus Green.

The farm I offer for premium contains one hundred and four-
teen acres, situated in Hadley. It has generally a clayey soil;
but nearly one-third, is gravelly and light. Twenty-six years
ago, I began to cultivate the premises. The land, at that
period, was, in part, wet, swampy and overrun with bushes;
and in part, poor, worn out, and comparatively unproductive.
The whole is now ina high state of cultivation. There is not
half an acre, that I have not ploughed. My custom has been
to plough eight or nine inches deep, with three pairs of oxen;
to observe a systematic rotation of crops; to introduce
economical improvements; to compost my manure with oyster
shell lime for top-dressing, and to mix varieties of seed corn
and grass seed.. On moist land, my herds-grass seed and redtop
are usually sown in the proportion of two pecks of the latter,
to one peck of the former.

During the present year, I have mowed thirty-one, tilled
thirty-five, and pastured forty-eight acres. The part in culti-
vation, was distributed as follows: twelve acres in rye, eleven
and one-half in corn, nine in oats, two in wheat, and a half
acre in potatoes. I have performed all the labor, assisted by
three boys; one of eighteen, another of sixteen, and the
youngest, eleven years old. We have spread about five hun-

20 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

dred and seventy-five loads of manure; four hundred and
seventy-five of compost, and the remainder of pure barnyard
droppings.

I give the items of produce and expenditure, premising that
the crop of corn is estimated in the following manner: I
counted the whole number of stacks, which are of similar size
and appearance, and the whole number was eight hundred and
twelve. I selected sixteen stacks, being the fair average
sample of the whole. Hach of these stacks averaged twenty-
seven baskets of corn, and each basket contained nineteen
quarts and a half of green, shelled corn.

Products :—

75 tons of hay, at $10, . ; : . $750 00
834 bushels, 317 quarts of corn, at 83 ee. : - 693 00
we rye, at 83 cents, . : - : . 261 45

25 tons of corn fodder, at $5, 3 ‘ : . 125 00
250 bushels, oats, at 50 cents, . . " . 125 00

15 tons rye, oats, and wheat straw, at $6, : oxi gey s LU

35 bushels wheat, at $1.25, . ¥ : A -t, SAL

45 « potatoes, at 42 cents, . d P «wa Seg

ft ft. i anples, at, T5,.centspu ive < vs «ducer bt asian Gee
Pasturage of 15 horned cattle, 26 weeks, ; . 150 00

4 “ 50 sheep, 26 weeks, . , : . 43 00
3715 loads of compost manure, . - / : . 375 00
100 loads barnyard 5 ed : : 2 . 100 00

$2,184 30

Expenditures :—

My labor, 250 days, at $1 per day, . : : . $250 00
Boy’s labor, 208 days, at 75 cents per day, : . 156 00
4 + “ « at 25 cents per ba é “44 82,009
Grass seed, . ; i ; : ~ 254100
Seed corn, 2 bushels, at $1, 3 ‘ 2 E : 2 00
“ wheat, 3 bushels, at $4.50, : 4 : 3 13:50
“ oats, 20 bushels, at 50 cents, . ‘ : « - £0100
“ rye, 12 bushels, at 75 cents, . é : ! 9 00
“ potatoes, 3 bushels, at 50 cents, : : : 1 50
Compost manure, 375 loads, at $1, . ; A - TSO

FARMS.

Barnyard manure, 100 loads, at $1, . :
Interest on land, at $50 per acre, :
Interest on buildings, at $1,000,

State, town and county taxes, . ‘ :

Net income, . ‘ ’ :

Hanptey, Mass.

Statement of William P. Dickinson.

21

- $100 00

342 00
60 00
32 50

—_——_——

$1,428 50

—

$1,355 80

Below you have a statement of the crops grown on my farm,

the past season :—
23 tons of hay, at $12,
105 bushels rye, at 83 cents,

17 “ ~ wheat, at $1.42,
40 « oats, at 51 cents, .
300 “ — corn, at 834 cents,
oa! “. Carter Wotetoes: at 75 ohne
oar “ “ (small) at 25 cents, .
70 “ Merino potatoes, at 42 cents,
54 “ turnips, at 1 shilling, 4
oe. & buckwheat, at 50 cents,
2 “ herds-grass seed, at $3, . :
85 “ carrots, at 2 shillings,
20 “ early potatoes, at 75 cents,
16 “ ruta-bagas, at 25 cents, . .
i broom seed, at 2 shillings, . ‘

600 pounds broom brush, at 5 cents,
11 tons of husks, at $14, . ’ :
Corn fodder and straw, .

. $276 00
87 50

24 14

20 00
250 00

oo) "48%
8 25

29 40

9 00

4 00

6 00

28 33

15 00

4 00

16 50

30 00

21 00

25 00

$902 87

As your committee, from observation and previous state-
ments, know something of the former condition of my farm, I
do not think it necessary to make a statement of it at this time.

I have employed one man and paid him one hundred and
twenty dollars for the year, and have done other work to the
amount of ninety dollars, leaving only thirty dollars as the

22 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

amount of hired labor. I have expended fifty dollars for lime,
salt, and bone dust. I have found lime very good for corn, and
as a top-dressing for grass. I used a mixture of two-parts lime,
two of plaster, and one of bone dust, for potatoes—putting
a handful in the hill at the time of planting. I left four
rows in the middle of the field without the mixture. These
rows were hardly worth the digging, while the remainder, for
this year, were very good. I have tried subsoil ploughing,
but cannot, as yet, see any good result from it; still, I shall
try it yet again. I practice turning up a part of my mowing
land, each year, in August, and -give it a dressing of fifteen
loads of compost manure to the acre, and sow one-half bushel
of herds-grass seed and one bushel of redtop seed to the acre.
I have mowed the past season, two tons to the acre, where last
year, it was hardly worth the mowing. I ploughed it in August,
1852, and put on a dressing of lime and ashes, and sowed it
with herds-grass and redtop seed.

Haptey, Nov. 22, 1853.

Statement of Josiah Allis.

In compliance with the rules of your society, I beg leave to
submit the following statement :—

My farm is situated in the easterly part of the town of
Whately, containing about ninety-five acres of land. Imade my
first purchase there, in 1826. It had been used for growing
rye and corn, and some hay, for years before; and some six
years after, as a piece of out-land, and all the crops were
carried off from the farm. I moved on to it in 1832, and com-
menced, in a small degree, to improve it. At that time, I could
not keep more than from six to eight cattle upon it through
the winter. In 1836, I attempted to raise a crop of teazles
upon it. I had found, at that time, a spot on the farm large
enough to raise the plants to stock two or three acres; but
not having land on my farm good enough to set the plants, I
hired of Mr. Moses Stebbins, of South Deerfield, some two
acres of his fine, rich, alluvial soil, at the rate, I think, of about
twenty or twenty-five dollars per acre, and we grew a fine
crop upon it. Not being satisfied with hiring land at that

FARMS. 23

rate, while owning so much, I determined again to improve my
own, as well and as fast as I could, and at the same time meet
my expenses. ‘There is, upon this farm, some twelve acres of
wood and unimproved land, including the river bank; and I
usually pasture from twenty-three to thirty-five acres. This
season, I have pastured twenty-three acres. Average stock in
the pasture, four cows and two horses. It has been my purpose
to increase my stock of hay, that I might be able to increase my
“pile” of manure. We usually cast into our barnyard two or
three loads of muck or sand, for every load of manure we
expect to have. This, we do, the last of November. After
carting out the compost made by the hogs through the summer,
early in the spring we mix our manure made during the winter,
with the muck and sand carted in during the fall, and shovel it
over once or more, as it may require, and apply it on ploughed
land for summer crops; sometimes ploughing it in, and some-
times spreading it after ploughing. As yet, I am undetermined
which is the best method. By following this method, our
manure heaps have gradually increased with the increase of our
crops from year to year; and now we are satisfied that we are
getting a rich return for the labor and expense of composted
manures; and I herewith send you a statement of the crops:
grown on the farm this year, with the market value; not claim-
ing, by any manner of means, that the farm is brought to per-
fection in cultivation, nor will it be, until the crops have:
doubled, and perhaps have quadrupled.

I had thirteen acres of corn, and at two bushels of ears for
one bushel. Hay at four hundred and seventy-five feet to the
ton.

75 tons of hay, at $12, °. ‘ , : - $876 00
200 bushels oats, at 50 cents, . : ; - - 100 00
1,000 pounds broomcorn, at 6 cents, F ‘ . 60 00
100 bushels seed, at 33 cents, . . : ‘ 33 00
1 acre, 25 bushels wheat, at $1.50, . : ‘ 37 00
3,900 pounds husks, : : : , am rene 30 00
17 tons stalks, . i : : : - 100 00

5 tons tobacco, at 10 roan : : “ . 1,000 00
650 bushels corn, : ; ; ‘ - 600 00

24 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

100 bushels ae at 50 cents, . ; , - $50 00
Poultry, . ; : § : : oto oe
250 loads compost. means, 4 ° ° ‘ - .200 00

9 shoats, . ‘ ; ; : , > . | OONOD

700 pounds pork, . oe ATE ONT ee ale
Pasturing 4 cows and 2 hate 2 : é - 65 00
$3,372 00

Farm, Dr.

4 laborers, $12.50 per month, for 8 months, . . $400 00
Board, $6 per month, ; : : : . . 192 00

400 loads manure, . : . “ A : . 400 00
Plaster, and extra manures, . ‘ : é »| L020
Interest on cost for $3,200, . : : : . “19200
Waxes, ... : F : é ; PUN Haya 1 |
Corn for team ae ae ; , : : : -' £8000
Grass seed, . : 2 : : ! ‘ sk 22456
$1,517 50

Balance in favor of farm, . é ; d } $1,854 50

Wuatety, November 12, 1853.

HAMPSHIRE,

Agriculture is not excelled in importance, not equalled even,
by any other art. When it flourishes, every other branch of
business thrives. More than three-fourths of our population
are employed in cultivating the earth. If crops are abundant,
and find ready markets and remunerating prices, producers
become liberal in their expenditures. Merchants, in conse-
quence, make large sales, and manufacturers readily dispose of
goods. Mechanics are employed in the erection of buildings,
or in making the numerous articles of comfort, or convenience,
suited to gratify the love of the ornamental and beautiful. On
the other hand, if, through lack of science or industry, or of the
timely rain and sunshine, the earth fails to “yield her increase,”
this great national bank ceases to discount. The farmer will
buy only what he absolutely needs. Provisions rise in price as

PARMS. cv 25

the supply diminishes. Traders have fewer sales. All classes
curtail their expenses.
The cultivation of the earth is the prominent business of our
people, and the leading pursuit of our nation. It employs more
men and more capital than all other trades and professions.
It produces a greater amount and variety of articles, desirable
and necessary, for our subsistence, our comfort and happiness.
It gives to the largest class of our population that kind of
employment which develops the physical and moral powers,
and allows of quite as much time for the cultivation of the
mind as any other occupation. It is cheering, therefore, to see
that so many of the leading men of our country are disposed to
encourage agriculture; that our government is toiling to aid;
that many of our educated men of all professions are endeavor-
ing to make it an exact science. We confidently hope the time
is not far distant when there will be facilities for a true agri-
cultural education, a knowledge of principles and _ practice,
obtained by actual observation and experiment. Then, of
agriculture we shall say, “It is a science, as well as an art.”
It is pleasing to notice the improvement that has already been
made; to observe the change that has taken place in the public
estimation of this business, and of the men engaged in it.
Farmers are now better known, more respected, and have more
influence in society than at any former period. The clergy-
man, or the physician, or the lawyer, is not now the only man
qualified to preside at town meetings, and make a record of the
transactions. The learned professions do not now furnish all
those who represent the people in the halls of legislation.
While it is admitted, however, that there has been improve-
ment in the knowledge and practice of this most important art,
it must be acknowledged that the improvement in this pursuit
has not kept pace with progress in other trades and profes-
sions, and with the great increase of our population. Relative-
ly, there has been a falling off; and, absolutely, there has been’
a diminution in the production of breadstuffs in our State.
Why should this great pursuit retrograde, even relatively ?
Why not progress as rapidly and continuously as commerce,
manufactures and the mechanic arts? No good and suflicient
reason can be given. Many desire to become rich faster than
4*

26 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

to advance by the slow but sure process of digging their
treasures from the earth. Their anxiety to become affluent at
once, and consequently above the toil and drudgery of tilling
the ground, leads them away from home to seek other more
popular and lucrative employments, at the peril of health, and
morals, and even life. Many who are engaged in this most
necessary, healthful and interesting occupation, feel very little
interest in their employment. ‘They pursue it, not from choice,
but from force of circumstances. Having failed to obtain other
business, or having been unfortunate in their chosen vocation,
they fall back to tilling the ground. Many cultivate their lands
for immediate profit, rather than ultimate improvement. These
make as little outlay as possible in the management of their
farms; and, instead of investing their increase of capital, from
time to time, in their legitimate business, as do those who are
engazed in commerce and navigation, merchandise and manufac-
tures, they invest in railroad or other stocks. Some give
almost exclusive attention to one field or one particular crop,
instead of studying to improve their whole farm, by adapting
the crop to its peculiar soil. How easy to enrich one field and
produce one large crop, by making every other part of the farm
pay tribute to this one. These errors we hope to see correct-
ed—at least not to see them socommon. We hope this im-
portant branch of business will hereafter receive more and
more encouragement from government, from agricultural socie-
ties, and from men of science.

The good influence of associations, annual exhibitions, ad-
dresses, reports and statements, is perceptible in the improve-
ment of buildings and fences, in the clearing of unseemly hedges,
in the removal of stumps and bogs, and in the general appear-
ance of comfort and thrift. One neighbor stimulates another ;
one learns from the example and practice of another; and each
becomes more interested in his work by seeing and hearing of
the successful or unsuccessful experiments of others.

For a description of the farms which reccived premiums, and
the manner in which they have been managed, we refer to the
statements below.

M. B. Green, Chairman.

FARMS. 27

Statement of Moses Stebbins.

The farm which I enter for premium contains forty-one acres,
situated near the Connecticut River, in South Deerfield. When
I came in possession, in 1831, ten acres of it consisted of a
poor, worn out, buckwheat field. In 1838 I resolved to have a
better farm. I hauled on clay, at the rate of fifty loads per
acre. Then I spread twenty-five loads of manure to the acre,
sowed two hundred pounds of plaster, ploughed all in together,
planted corn, and obtained a fair crop. At the outset I tried
but three acres, by way of experiment, and after witnessing
the result, I continued until I had treated the ten acres alike.
After corn, I planted oats, and stocked down to clover.

By use of clay and manure, I have made all my land as good
as the best, and increased my pastures one hundred per cent.
in quantity and quality of feed. I have practised ploughing
deep, and do so now, but in a different way from my former
practice. I now plough in manure four or five inches deep;
then subsoil as deep as I can runa subsoil plough. I prefer
this to running deep, in order to turn up the subsoil. I com-
monly plant my land two years in succession; thereby mixing
soil and manure, and pulverizing the soil for grass. Instead of
oats I raise barley, which I deem far more profitable to the
farmer. Where we made one hundred loads of manure in 1838,
we now make three hundred and fifty loads. I haul from
seventy-five to one hundred loads of earth into my barn and
hog yards, annually, to absorb the liquid manures, which I con-

ider as valuable as the solid. I think much of hogs for the
manufacture of compost manure. I have used salt with good
results, on both grass and wheat. For old worn out pastures,
I recommend the free use of plaster, and for fruit trees, I apply
salt and lime, freely, and wash often with white lye.

My farm has been divided, the present year, as follows:
twenty-three acres of mowing; thirteen acres in corn and po-
tatoes; three in barley, and two in wheat. My stock consists
of three pairs of oxen; three stcers, three years old; five cows;
seven two years old; three yearlings; one hundred and fifty
sheep and twenty-five hogs.

28 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

Products :—
Corn, 750 bushels, at 90 cents, : . $675 00
Hay, 55 tons, at $10, .. P ? s, ¥ 550.00
Pork sold, . ‘ ; : . 250 00
Corn-fodder, 35 tons, at $5, ’ ; sryin dao
Barley, 100 bushels, at 85 cents, . ; 85 00
Cash received for labor, : ; ; 75 00
Wheat, 40 bushels, at $1.50, . : : 60 00
Potatoes, 75 bushels, at 50 cents, . ‘ 37 50
Corn-fodder sold, 2} tons, at $15, . ; 33 15
Straw, 4 tons, at $6, . “ : ; 24 00

$1,965 25
Expenses :—

Labor, . E , aaeepo00; 00
Corn, 200 sasha at S71 a erika, : ; 175 00
Oats,100 do. at 50 ‘cents, ; : 50 00
Ashes, 300 do. at 14 cents, . : 42 00
Plaster, 2 tons, at $9, . : : : 18 00
Clover seed, 60 lbs. at 124 cents, . : 7 50
Corn-fodder, 5 tons, at $5, . : : 25 00
Straw, 2 tons,at $7, . : ; 14 00
Interest on land, valued $3,200, é : 192 00
Taxes, . : : e : : : 25 00

848 50

Net profit, . ; : : : . ; $1,116 7d

DeEERFIELD, November, 1853.

Statement of Austin Smith § Sons.

The farm, which we enter for premium, contains seventy-three
acres, situated in Sunderland. It has been our aim to increase,
economically, the productiveness of the whole farm, and to
raise useful, and remunerating crops. This, we have endeavored
to do, by the making, saving, and proper application of manures,
and by thorough cultivation of the soil.

' It is our practice in raising Indian corn, to plough, or har-
row in manure, at the rate of twelve or fifteen loads to the

FARMS. 29

acre, and to apply a handful of ashes, in the hill, at planting.
We hoe four times, and usually seed the land with clover, red-
top, and timothy, for the next year’s mowing.

We have put compost manure for broomcorn, in the hills, at
the rate of sixteen loads to the acre, until the present year;
when we have applied it, as on our Indian corn land, at the
rate of twelve loads to the acre. We added half a spoonful
of super-phospate of lime and plaster in the hill. We planted
our broomeorn with Woodward’s corn-planter, and we have
never known our land so well and uniformly stocked, as the
present year.

We prefer, for a wheat field, to turn over a rich and warm
clover sward. Oats we have nearly done raising. We plough
from six to nine inches deep, and loosen the soil a little deeper
each succeeding year. We usually make about three hundred
and fifty loads of manure every season.

During the present season, our farm has been divided, as fol-
lows: twenty-seven acres in mowing; ten in Indian corn; four-
teen in broomcorn; five in rye; two in wheat; one in oats;
one in carrots and sowed corn; thirteen in pasture.

The following table correctly exhibits the products, expen-
ditures and net profit of our farm, the present year :—

Products :—

580 bushels of corn, at 92 cents, . - $533 60
11,900 pounds of broomcorn, at 53 cents,. 654 50
980 bushels of broomcorn seed, at 40c., 392 00
52 ~—s do. wheat, at $1.50, . o » 18.00
1th do. rye, at 874 cents, . . 100 05
45 do. oats, at 50 eents,. ° . 22 50
50 ~~ do. potatoes, at 40 cents, . 20 00
50 ~— do. carrots, at 335 cents, . 16 66
16... ‘do. turnips, at 25 cents, . 4 00
40 tons of hay, at $12, : - 480 00
23 do. corn-fodder, at'$6, . . 138 00
2} do. wheat and oat straw, at$6, 15 00
35 do. rye straw, at $5, : oe (VR 60
624 pounds of butter, at 162 cents, . 104 00

30 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

350 loads of manure, at $1, : é » $350: 00
Improvement of farm, . ; ; ; 100 00

$3,025 81
Expenditures :—

Our own labor, 452 days, at $1, _ —. . $452 00

First hired man, 8 months, 5 days, at $20, 170 00

Second do. 8 months, at $19, . : 152 00

Third ao. ‘cy it pasie 13 days, at $18, 136 00

Grass seed, . é a, é 10 00
2 bushels of seed corn, at $1, : . 2 00
a! + do. oats, at 50 cents, . ; 1 50
41 do. rye, at 80 cents, 3 60
odo. wheat, at $1.50, 4 50.
34 do. potatoes, at 50 cents, . 1 75
ae 0. broomcorn, at 75 cents, oo)
150 ~~ do. ashes, at 162 cents, . - 25 00
14 tons of plaster, at $10, . : 5 15 00
Super- phosphate of ute salt, and per -shell
lime, . 40 00
350 loads of manure, at $1, : : : 350 00
Interest on tillage land at $100 per acre, 360 00
Interest on pasturage at $40, . : : 31 20
Taxes on the same, : A : : 32 60
1,788 65

Net profit, on seventy-three acres, . : - $1,257 LO

SUNDERLAND, October 4, 1853.

Statement of Samuel Powers.

My farm is in Hadley, and contains eighty-seven acres. Fifty-
four acres lie almost in one body, within half a mile of my
dwelling. ‘Twenty-one acres of pasture and twelve acres of
woodland, are near Fort River.

I purchased, several years since, a number of acres of very
trifling value, so filled with water as to be unproductive. But,
by draining, ploughing and subduing, this land is now as beautiful
in appearance, and as productive, as any in this region, It has

FARMS. 31

paid for all the improvements. I have, also, taken large quan-
tities of muck or peat from my swamp, and spread it on lands
at a little distance back. This has increased both the crops
and value of the land, fifty per cent. or more. My pasture,
consisting of twenty-one acres, is situated on’Fort River; and,
in consequence of being yearly overflowed, is very productive,
and capable of keeping in.good condition from eight to ten
cows.

During the present year, I have cultivated fifty-two acres, as
follows: twenty-seven acres in grass; seven in corn; five in
broomcorn; five in rye; two in wheat; two in tobacco; two
in potatoes; and two in oats. The labor has been performed
by myself and a hired man. In hay time, I employed another
hand; but, during the season, I worked enough for others to
pay for him.

Products :—
40 tons of hay, at $10,. : ‘ . $400 00
14 do. of tobacco, at $250, é ; 375 00
420 bushels of corn, at 874 cents, . é 367 50
14 tons of broomcorn, at $110, . . 165 00
1 coe of pork, . . : ; ‘ 160 00
150 loads of manure, at $1, . : : 150 00
300 bushels of broomcorn seed, at 33 cents, 99 00

100 do. of rye, at 87i cents, . : 87 50
40 do. of wheat, at $1.25, ; ; 50 00
80 do. of oats, at 50 cents, . : 40 00
75 do. of potatoes, at 42 cents, . 31 50

—$1,925 50

Expenses :—
Labor, . 5 ; 5 : : antbird. 62
Grass seed, . , Be ; 4 00
5 bushels of rye, at 15 ae : : 3.75
4 do. of wheat, at $1.50, : : 6 00
4 do. of oats, at 50 cents, : 2 00
10 do. of potatoes, at 17 ena ° 1 70
Seed corn, . E : : : 1 18

8,000 tobacco her : ° . F 4 00

32 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

150 loads of manure, . : ; oP 4 $1500
Interest on 54 acres, worth $5,400, : 324 00

Interest on 21 do. worth $1,050, . ‘ 63 00
Town and county taxes, . : ; ‘ 30 00
— $760 25
Net profit, : é : $1,165 25

Hapury, Noy. 25, 1853.

HAMPDEN.

The committee on farms respectfully submit their report
upon the duties referred to them, viz.: the examination of such
entire farms as might be entered, as competing for the premiums
offered. The object of these premiums is one of the most im-
portant in its results that can arrest the attention of the farmer.
It is—as the terms of this society declare in the offer—to
ascertain from reliable data, “the most valuable and economical
improvements in the cultivation and management of an entire
farm, with all its appendages.” This subject, in many of our
sister societies, is made more deeply interesting in its details
than most others pertaining to their transactions. They pre-
sent the total inventory of the farm in all its appendages, and
show to the farmer, and (through the press) to the world, the
skill and enterprise of its owner. It is indeed a mirror, reflect-
ing the lights and shades of a farmer’s life; it details his opera-
tions and his success, as a guide for others; and no individual
engaged in agricultural pursuits should permit the year to close
until he has made this inventory of his affairs for his own use
at least. Having the Transactions of the Worcester West
Society now open before us, we look upon the report of two
farms in the town of Barre, perfected in all their details, and
the balance sheet exhibits more distinctly than argument, the
value of the record. We would give an abstract from this
report, with the pleasing hope that it would stimulate many in
this county to favor us with their statements in future, but we
will not disturb the unity of the whole, for a part; the whole
is most earnestly recommended to the farmers of Hampden, as
a model. And let it be ours to learn something from every

FARMS. 33

practical lesson. The statements to which we refer may be
found in the Annual Report of the Commonwealth, on the trans-
actions of the agricultural societies in this State for 1852, page
239; but to aid those who may not have the benefit of this
volume for reference, we would suggest some of the outlines
which should constitute the form and material of the statements,
upon which the claim for premium should be predicated. The
number of acres contained in the farm; the distribution of these
acres in relation to their culture—as tillage, mowing, pasturage,
woodland, and unimproved—with their aggregate value—the
number and value of the stock kept on the farm, the manner
of feeding and fattening all animals intended for slaughter,
the separate and distinct operations of cultivating the various
crops produced, the amount of manure made, how made, and
how applied; the amount of help employed in the management
of the farm, both men and cattle; these are some of the appen-
dages which are required to sustain the claim of the applicant;
and no statements are perfect unless they include the internal
arrangement of his domestic interests, for no good farmer will
ever desire to exclude the industry, economy and assistance
derived from his partner, from a full participation in the exhibit
of his success, for surely neither justice nor equity would ever
award all the credit to the “orr ox,” for all the work done on
the farm; so far your committee subscribe to the declaration
of “woman’s rights,” in the full belief that in this way they
will receive that just reward which their duties and diligence
entitle them to receive, but which are now denied them, as
silent partners in the concern. If an intimate knowledge of
one’s business is necessary to success in any concern, it is surely
so in agricultural pursuits. This is in fact the true Science of
Agriculture ; a term too often misconstrued, and supposed by
many to mean something etherial, and beyond the reach of
ordinary minds; something desirable to possess, but too distant
to be overtaken; while in fact, it is nothing more subtle or
difficult of possessing, than a practical knowledge and an inti-
mate acquaintance with the various duties of your vocation: in
the mechanic arts, for instance, the steam engine is a complete
union of mental ingenuity and physical application, and is a
perfect demonstration of all we ask in favor of agriculture.
5*

34 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

And whenever the mind’ is applied to this subject, with that
energy which the subject demands, the hands will execute the
design. And then, and not till then, will the science of agricul-
ture keep pace with her sister sciences. But it will be said by
many that this operation is attended with too much trouble;
that the charge is worth more than the game. It is not such
minds that we would address with the hope of success; but to
the young farmer, who has or is about to engage in this employ-
ment, we can present no surer method to positive results and
success, than to keep the memorandum of his daily operations
well posted up. The time has come, and now is, for the friends
of agriculture to make some demonstration, of a more eleyated
system of practice, and this can neyer be accomplished until
the mind is made to codperate with the hands. The materials
are presented at every step; in every operation upon the farm
there is something that offers a subject for investigation.

In presenting this subject, your committee are not insensible
that they have assumed a breader range of remark than a
mere presentation of their action (upon the duties referred)
would seem to demand; but the importance of the subject has
been deeply impressed upon our minds at every step of our
progress in the pursuit of these duties. The great difficulty of
obtaining the statistics of the farm, from those immediately
interested, is the most convincing evidence that the subject has
not received the attention which its importance demands, and we
cannot forbear once more to solicit the careful consideration of
every farmer to the subject. And were we permitted to offer
one suggestion by way of counsel, we would repeat the advice
of Ex-Governor Steele at our anniversary dinner table, “ Plough
deep—plough deep!” and we would add: let the soil represent
the mind, and then plough as deep as you please, stir up the
subsoil, and bring out the resources that have too long been
hidden from the surface. In this way only can we improve the
mind and the soil.

In presenting the statements furnished by the individuals
competing for the premiums, we have but few remarks to
accompany them. Such instances of successful enterprise are
to us like some interesting volume in which we meet with so
many absorbing recitals that we are turning down a leaf, or

FARMS. 35

marking for future use, almost every page in the book. The
idea of enriching, and permanently improving an entire farm
from its own resources, should be the prominent action of every
farmer. The most judicious method of applying these re-
sources, to obtain the greatest results, is the work of the mind.
These resources may be considered as distinct, the one natural
or mechanical, the other artificial or animal: the first costs the
farmer comparatively little more than the expense of removal
from their present location; the other, almost the entire pro-
duct: of the farm, in its manufacture. By natural resources it
will readily be perceived that we refer to those means which
are available, and within the reach of every one. Such are the
head lands cf his fields, the sides of his ditches, and other
portions of his farm, which have long remained unoccupied, and
have not only retained their natural richness, but have been
annually increasing in value by the increase of decomposed
vegetable materials. Clay is another resource which by being
exchanged, load for load, with some other portion of the farm,
will produce astonishing results. But a bed of good muck may
well be considered the farmer’s bank, the capital of which is
unproductive until drawn out and put in circulation. It is like
the specie, which redeems all drafts presented, and is still
accumulating interest. Let every one who is a stockholder in
such a bank realize his facilities, by presenting his frequent
drafts upon the capital stock. The instance of Mr. Ashley is
more pertinent to the point, and unequivocal in demonstration,
than any theoretical argument however forcibly presented.
One fact, practically illustrated in agricultural pursuits, we
vonsider worth more than a thousand theories. And the state-
ments of Mr. Ashley we candidly recommend to the considera-
tion of every farmer, with the earnest hope that many of them
will thus be induced to realize the full amount of all their re-
sources, and communicate freely to the society the results of
their experience.

Francis Brewer, Chairman.

36 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

William Pynchon’s Statement.

Having entered my farm for premium, I respectfully submit
the following statement for the consideration of your commit-
tee :-—

My farm contains ninety acres, which are divided as follows:
The lot upon which my barn is built, contains fifty acres, and
with the exception of twelve acres, which I have purchased
the present season, enclosed with good post and rail and slab
fence, the latter along the public road.

My principal crops are hay, corn, potatoes, tobacco, rye, and
oats, and these fifty acres are mostly appropriated to these
products in the following proportion:—about thirty acres in
grass, seven to eight acres in corn, two to three acres in
tobacco, and the balance in oats, potatoes, and other small
crops. My usual way of managing this land, is as follows :—
for my corn crop, I take that portion of my grass land which
has been the longest seeded down, and consequently the tightest
bound, and put on about ten cords of good manure per acre,
and cover it to the depth of ten inches. This produces from
seventy-five to eighty bushels per acre. For my tobacco crop,
I take a portion of the land that I planted in corn the year
before, and plough again to the depth of ten inches, and then
spread on from the cart a good coat of compost, which I make
with soil and yard manure, in the proportion of two parts of
the former to one of the latter. This I harrow in thoroughly,
and until the ground is very mellow. My tobacco land, pre-
pared in this way, produces two thousand pounds per acre, and
leaves the land in fine condition for restocking, which I do as
soon as the tobacco is off. I use no plough in this operation,
but give the land a good harrowing, and sow on the seed and
rollitin. Ithink this preferable to ploughing, having tried both
ways. The balance of my corn land I usually put in oats and
stock at the same time. My oats average about sixty bushels
per acre. My potato crop varies with the seasons. For my
rye, and other small crops, I select such portions of land as
need the plough and a little stimulus in the way of manure,
and restock as opportunity offers. I use compost on my grass
land, preferring the fall season for this purpose. After going

FARMS. 37

over with compost, I use a fine tooth harrow, which breaks tho
knobs and loosens the surface, giving the compost a better
chance at the roots of the grass. My crop of grass is usually
heavy, producing, unless affected by drought, two to three tons
per acre. Managing my land in this way, I am enabled to keep
it in good condition, always getting large crops at compara-
tively small expenditures. I consider my land worth from
fifteen to twenty per cent. more now, than when I commenced
this system of culture.

My barn is one hundred feet long, by forty-two wide, and
cost me $1,700. This enables me to house all my crops,
including my corn fodder, which, when properly cured, I con-
sider of very great importance, and worth to me, $6 per ton,
in keeping my young stock. The balance of my farm is in
pasture, containing forty acres, and is enclosed with stone wall,
and post and rail fence. I have this divided in two nearly
equal parts by a fence running through the middle. I pasture
only one-half at a time, changing from one to the other as they
eat it down. With the assistance of a sprinkling of plaster
in the spring, this keeps in fine condition, twenty or thirty head
of young cattle.

I sell only such parcels of my crops as I cannot feed out to
my stock advantageously, preferring to return to the soil all I
take from it. My plan is, in raising or purchasing stock, to
select none but the choicest breeds; this enables me, in selling,
to cbtain satisfactory prices, and makes farming a pleasant and
profitable recreation,

SPRINGFIELD,

Edmund Ashley’s Statement.

The farm which I offer for examination by your commit-
tee, contains sixty acres of rolling, uneven surface, embracing
high gravelly knolls, and descending from these points, to low
swamp muck beds, or to the margin of running brooks, leaving
but a small portion that is level. This profile will exhibit
these margins as naturally wet and spongy; and as productive,
in its natural state, of little else than the coarse, sour grass
and herbaze, indigenous to such locations. The higher portions
of this farm are evidently an argillaceous soil, well filled with

38 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

coarse gravel. The latter predominates largely. These
features may be considered repulsive, and may have lent their
influence, to the former proprietor of these acres. But from
the cause we turn to the result. The farm had deteriorated
for many years, and the products might be summed up in the
word, moicty. The amount of good hay cut annually, would
not probably exceed five tons; the remainder, if any, was cut
along the margins of the brooks, and swales; consequently very
little stock could be wintered on the farm. With the small
amount of manure made, little attention was bestowed upon the
cultivation of vegetables, or the cereal crops; these were the
external features of the farm at the time of my purchase in
1846. I should here observe, that this purchase did not include
the whole sixty acres. Recent additions of similar land have
been made to the first purchase, and are included in the agere-
gate. The method which I pursued in the commencement of
my operations, was the purchase of manure, from the stables
in Cabotville, and applying it liberally to the soil for the
growth of corn and potatoes, hoping, in this way, to warm and
sufficiently invigorate such portions as I could annually manage
by this process, to produce a larger crop of grass, after being
seeded down with a crop of winter grain, or with oats, in the
spring,—eiving to each a top-dressing of leached ashes, at the
time of sowing. This process was pursued for several years,
until a large portion of the farm had been once, at least, re-
versed in its surface, but the results were not perfectly satis-
factory. The balance sheet, after paying for the manure,
ashes, and the cartage of them some two or three miles, with
the necessary expenses of cultivation included, exhibited a
balance which would hardly justify a continuance:of this pro-
eess. These applications soon lost their influence, and must
be renewed, with similar results, or some more effective and
durable appliances must be made. With this view of the sub-
ject, I resolved—against the dissuasive arguments and even
ridicule of many whose opinions upon almost any other sub-
ject would have influenced my purpose—to commence opera-
tions with the use of muck. The evidence of an abundant
supply near the centre of the farm would not incur much ex-
pense in the experiment, and if successful, would justify a

FARMS. 39

further prosecution. These inducements led me to have exca-
vated several hundred loads of it, during the season when most
available. This heap, after lying several months, was tried
as a top-dressing, and harrowed in on land which had been
ploughed for corn and potatoes. The results which followed
this trial induced me to continue the experiment, and I speak
with entire confidence, when I assert the suecess which has
attended the use of muck, used in the form of compost, made
with two loads of muck and one of green or unfermented
manure, which is preferable; or the muck used alone, after
being sufficiently digested in the heap. It is to the results of
this practice which I have called the attention of the commit-
tee, in the examination of the farm, as more especially worthy
of their notice, and indicated by the crops standing upon the
ground at the time of their visit. I present no claim for origi-
nality of design or execution in the pursuit of this experiment,
but present my farm with the improvements, which have been
made by the most economical, and, I believe, judicious means,
in my power. I give youa memorandum of the available pro-
ducts of the farm for the present season, which I think are not
overestimated, and will exhibit the entire arrangement of the
farm.

25 acres mowing,—cut . : . 50 tons of hay.
aie wheat,’*' yield ; . 5 bushels grain.
5 «rye, 5] A Bene
4 * oats, oe oh , . 150 a “
4 « buckwheat,“ - i . 100 a is
eee corn, aces : . 150 a“ a“
Sp. potatoes, «6. : . 700 a“

The remaining ten acres are not available as tillage, but are
available as a fund for the future improvement of the farm, in
the article of muck, and other materials for the compost heap.
In the use of stimulating materials for my crops, I have but
little expericnce,—plaster answers well on some crops, but
does not avail on many others, especially the narrow leafed
grasses and the grain crops; vines, clover, and potatoes, are
especially benefited by the use of plaster. I sometimes have
tried, with signal benefit, a mixture of muck, hen manure, and.

40 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

plaster, in the hills of corn, used at the time of planting.
There was upon the farm, when I bought it, about forty apple
trees. These have, jn some seasons, added largely to the in-
come from the farm, but are unproductive this season. I have
enlarged the number within a short period past, by setting out
about fifty more trees of selected fruit. I keep no stock on
this portion of my farm, as it is some distance from my resi-
dence. Ihave not mentioned the value of the products, nor
included in the account the straw of the grain, or the fodder
from the corn; nor have I presented the bill of expenses
attending the cultivation; the balance, however, is satisfactory
to me, and will induce me to continue my present course of
manazement.

West SPRINGFIELD.

NORFOLK SOCIETY.*

The committee have been invited to visit but a single farm
during the past year—that of the Hon. B. V. French, of Brain-
tree. To describe this farm minutely and render a statement,
in detail, of its cultivation, its products, its improvements, and
their cost, is not, at this time, in our power. Indeed this can
be done only by the respected occupant of the farm himself.
Our visit, occupying the greater part of a bright summer’s day,
was entirely devoted to a view of improvements, made and in
progress, which are, at once, upon a grand scale and of thorough
workmanship—producing, where finished, results of rare beauty
and utility.

Whoever wishes to see one of the best examples, in our
county, of deep and thorouzh ploughing, trenching, and draining,
or to understand the benefit of the practical application of
science to labor, so as to give the highest culture and most
attractive finish to a once hard, rough and rocky soil,—whoever
is curious to know how immense bodies of granite can be
expeditiously removed, and converted into massive, durable,
and well-finished walls, or laid as covering for drains beneath

* The statement of the only farm that received a premium is embodied in the
Report of the Committee.

FARMS. 41

°

the surface; or to ascertain how unsightly and noxious bogs,
and well-nigh worthless swamps and meadows can best be
turned into smooth and fertile grass fields, or prolifie cran-
berry beds; or how a barren, sandy hill-side can be covered
with nutritious food for cattle-—whoever would gratify his love
of horticulture, and feast his eye and his palate upon delicious
fruits and beautiful flowers——whoever asks if it be possible
that a farm of little promise and many disheartening features,
can ever be made a scene of beauty pleasant to behold, easy
to cultivate, remunerative of labor, and satisfactory in its
whole results, let him go with your committee when next they
are invited to visit this noble farm.

Observation afforded us ample proof that here was syste-
matic, intelligent labor, under careful oversight and _ super-
intendence, of liberal outlay for desired results; of generous
confidence in the laborer, and care for his comfort and improve-
ment, and, in return, of sympathy with the employer, and a
readiness to meet all his wishes; and of a daily record of
operations and results, kept with business-like minuteness
and accuracy, showing at once the cost and receipts, the prod-
ucts and improvements of the farm. Of the different classes
of stock, we saw choice breeds of oxen, cows, horses and
swine, which had been selected with the greatest care, and
preserved with unsparing attention to their comfort, nourish-
ment and growth. The farm buildings are all contrived for
use—the most convenient and economical use—with no ex-
pense for mere ornament and show. In the barns and the
sties cattle and swine are at home, and enjoy all the comforts
of a proper home. In the house are apartments for the labor-
ers, provided with every requisite for their ease and enjoy-
ment. A well-warmed and lighted reading-room, furnished
with many papers of the day, and with boo of scientific
and general information, invites them to spend their even-
ings there; while, in another apartment, a large and well-
selected library, containing many of the best agricultural pub-
lications, discovers the resort of the employer for that informa-
tion which enables him so skilfully to direct the operations of
the farm.

That the outlay and income of such a farm would more than

6*

42 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

balance each other—if indeed so favorable a result as this were
produced—we should not expect in the hands of most farmers.
That it is profitable, under its present management, we have no
good reason to doubt. But were it not so, we should still
account the cultivator of such a farm a public benefactor. A
knowledge of his modes of operation and their results would
be a public benefit; and the imitation of his example, with
judicious reference to the different circumstances in which it
may be applied, would be a source of individual and public
wealth and happiness. There are, besides the actual returns
in dollars and cents, by which most men do, and perhaps ought,
to estimate the present value of their lands, the satisfactions
arising from the successful accomplishment of one’s plans, bring-
ing health and cheer; from the knowledge of superior means
of support and comfort afforded one’s laborer’s; from the sight
of valuable and permanent improvements made, by which others,
if not one’s self, will reap large benefit; stone walls that are
built for ages, and in the construction of which it is difficult to
imagine further improvement; waste, or almost worthless lands
reclaimed and rendered bountifully productive; trees planted,
from which generations are to pluck the choicest fruit; and the
whole farm made beautiful by skill and culture. There is in
these facts much to compensate any failure of remuneration in
hard money, if such failure ensues. Then, too, in the case of
Mr. French, there is another and higher satisfaction, the worth
of which is understood by every mind possessed of right sensi-
bilities. He cultivates and adorns, improves and preserves his
paternal acres; the spot which was his early home, and is now
endeared to him, beyond all others, by associations and remem-
brances of the purest and most inspiring sort! Who would not
wish to preserve the soil on which his fathers trod and toiled,
where his own first breath was drawn, from passing into stran-
ger-hands ? Who would not cheerfully labor through years of
hardest business life, for means to be expended in reclaiming
and enriching, in preserving and adorning the place, which shall
go down, with his ancestral name, to future generations? Who
would not love to be the benefactor of his own and his parents’
neighbors and friends, while he lives, and to mingle his ashes
with theirs, when he dies?

FARMS. 43

In this utilitarian age and community, such remarks as these
may to most men appear absurd. Yet would we think it none
the less our duty, in attempting to further the ends of an asso-
ciation like our own, to speak of such motives and encourage-
ments to the farmer; to inculcate a high regard for the better
sentiments and sensibilities of our nature; and to hold forth to
the young the idea that there is something, besides money-
making, to be estimated in the plan of one’s life ;—that there
are more enduring and satisfying riches than the “ golden ore,”
and that such riches lie within the reach of every honest and
true-hearted laborer on the soil.

The following are the crops cultivated by Mr. French; the
past season.

Tilled land :—

Two acres of peas; two and a half acres flat turnips; one-
half acre sweet corn; one-half acte squashes; one and one.
half acre mangel-wurzel and blood beets; two acres onions;
one-quarter acre parsnips; one-half acre ruta-bagas; four acres
cabbages; four and a half acres potatoes; one-half acre to-
matoes; two acres carrots; two acres fodder corn; two acres
miscellaneous crops in the garden—total, twenty-five acres.

We commend the example of Mr. French to the young and
aspiring farmers of our county.

In conclusion, we would once more urge upon farmers the
formation and generous support of town clubs, or associations
for mutual encouragement and help. These clubs or associa-
tions are obviously needed, and may be made the sources of
benefits which can hardly be overestimated. They may be par-
ticularly useful in a large part of this county by enabling the
several members of them to avail themselves, at comparatively
trifling cost, of a large number and variety of the best agricul-
tural books and newspapers which a common fund might easily
procure. Still further, they would, in much the same way, fur-
nish many individuals the help of labor-saving implements and
conveniences which their separate means would not afford,
however desirable such help might be. The most intelligent
farmers, and best managed farms, will generally be found where
valuable agricultural books and papers are most extensively
read; and the most thrifty and contented cultivators of the

44 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

soil will generally be seen, we believe, where the best imple-
ments and means for saving hard toil, and a too often limited
time, are at hand.

CuHarLEes C, SEWALL, Chairman.

RECLAIMED MEADOWS.
ESSEX.

From the Report of the Committee.

The committee on wet meadows and swamp lands, have the
satisfaction to believe that the subject intrusted to their charge,
is one of vast importance to the farming community, and is,
every year, more distinctly appreciated.

Although the number of claims presented for consideration
is not so great as might have been expected in the county, still
there are enough to present a distinct illustration of what can
be done in the way of improvement, and to show the benefits
that may be derived by doing it.

The several claimants have so fully stated the peculiarities
of their operations, that the committee do not feel called on to
go much into detail as to what they themselves have seen.
And they are the more willing to be relieved of this duty, as
by an unfortunate combination of circumstances in relation to
the notices of the entries, made by some of the claimants, their
opportunities for examination, while the crops were growing,
were not so complete as could have been desired. Their
opinions, therefore, of the comparative merits of the claims pre-
sented, are made substantially from the statements submitted,
of which, all who read them, will have the opportunity of
judging, as have the committee.

A few general ideas seem to be essential to be regarded in
relation to lands of this deseription.

First, the surplus water is to be removed, and completely
removed. While any of this remains, so far, at least, there
will be an effectual barrier to improvement. Ditches or drains

RECLAIMED MEADOWS. 45

for the conveyance of the surplus water are to be constructed,
and so far as practicable, covered, the better to increase the
surface for cultivation, and to remove the awkwardness of the
excavations on the surface. This is particularly the case with
ditches or drains for the shore springs, and cross ditches or
drains running to the drains in the centre of the meadow or
swamp operated on.

Drains laid with tile, made for this purpose, from two to four
inches in diameter, at a cost of about four cents a foot, have
come to the knowledge of the chairman, greatly improving the
grounds on which they are laid. Without question, many par-
cels of what are generally denominated cold, spring land, would
be doubled in value by properly laying one hundred rods of
such drains to the acre. This mode of improvement has hither-
to been but little regarded by Massachusetts farmers. It is
coming much into use in Western New York.

As to the depth to which these ditches or drains should be
made, much will depend upon the depth of the mire and the
hardness of the bottom; generally three feet will be found
quite sufficient to let off the water, if the meadow has ordinary
slope or descent. There are few meadows that have not some
avenue for draining that can be opened near at hand. Nature,
when she built the one, took care to provide the other. There
are few “dismal swamps,” or “sloughs of despond,” about the
farms of New England.

Another consideration, in undertaking an operation of this
kind is, how far is it expedient to carry gravel or other materials
from the upland upon the surface of the meadow? Just so far,
we should say, as may be necessary to give the surface, after
the water is drained off, an operative firmness for sustaining
the crops, and no further. We do not hold to expending twice
as much, in covering the meadow, as it will be worth after it is
covered; but would have all the operations in the process con-
ducted with an economy that will pay; at the same time with
a thoroughness that shall forever remove the meadow character
from the land. We are particular to notice this, because we
have more than once seen meadows pretended to be reclaimed,
that would not stay reclaimed.

In our observations upon this class of lands, we have repeat-

46 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

edly witnessed the benefits of the application of fertilizing
liquids, much after the manner mentioned in the well-drawn
statement of Mr. Page, of the meadow improved on the Danvers
town farm. If, as he proposes, the surplus fluids from the hog-
yard and the receptacles of fertilizing materials about the
dwellings, can be conducted and diffused over the two or three
acres of grass land near by, we cannot doubt they will be amply
sufficient to keep these lands in a condition capable of growing
three or four tons of grass to the acre annually. We have
seen, the present season, a field of ten acres, adjacent to a
stable, where a large stock of animals was fed and stationed,
so fertilized by the liquids accumulated in these stalls, as to
add to the burden of grass at least one and a half tons to the
acre—that is, to cause the entire field to yield three tons to
the acre, when heretofore it has yielded only half this amount.
This was on the beautiful farm of Richard 8. Rogers, in Dan-
vers, who, while he expends from his ample fortune freely on
his greenhouses and his fences by the way, exhibits diserimi-
nating judgment upon his cultivated fields, and produces crops
in great abundance.

One of the most interesting operations that has come to our
observation on meadow lands the present season, was on the
farm of Thomas E. Payson, in Rowley. He has fifty acres or
more, adjoining, where the peat or mud is from three to seven
feet deep, so situated as to be capable of being drained so as
to admit a wagon with a common load of hay.to pass on any
part of it. Mr. Payson has cut narrow ditches about five feet
apart, and thrown the mud on the beds between, and planted
these beds with potatoes. In the autumn, when the potatoes
were gathered, he threw the vines into the ditches, levelled the
eround and sowed grass seed. Where he pursued this course
last year, on about three-quarters of an acre, he cut three tons
of good English hay to the acre the present season. In this
way he contemplates bringing the whole into English mowing.
The failure of the potato crop this year, by reason of the rot,
prevented his forwarding his statement.

Tt will be observed that this improvement proceeds without
carrying any material from the upland upon the meadow, except
a common dressing of manure to start the potatoes. Conse-

RECLAIMED MEADOWS. 47

quently it must be done, if effectually done, at much less expense
than is ordinarily applied. The great difficulty attendant upon
covered drains is the expense of their construction, unless
there may be on the farm, at times, a surplus of hands, and the
work can be done at odd jobs when other work is not pressing.
Such, we understand, were the circumstances under which much
of the labor was done, in the experiment on the town farm in
Danvers.

The committee recommend the publication of the several
statements as presented.

' J. W. Procror, Chairman.

Adino Page's Statement.

I offer for examination, and premium, (if thought worthy of
it,) a piece of reclaimed meadow and run-land, situate on the
town farm in Danvers, near the avenue that leads to the house,
and easterly of the same. This parcel of land, previously to
1850, was usually known by the name of the “pond-hole.”
The peat mud was several feet deep over the greater part of
it—in some parts the mire was ten or twelve feet. It was sup-
plied with water by springs oozing from the surrounding high-
lands, and was often impassable, by man or beast, and so full of
water as to have an offensive and forbidding aspect.

In the season of 1850, it yielded only about half a ton of the
coarsest kind of meadow grass and rushes. In the autumn of
that year, ditches were cut around the borders, so as to receive
the water that came in from the hills; and cross-ditches were
cut to an old ditch in the centre, that was cleaned out, so as to
let off the water at the southerly end. These ditches were cut
across about three rods apart, thereby forming the land into
beds of that width, and were covered with stones and turfs, so
far as convenient to do so. Where the land would support a
team, the plough was used to turn the sod; in other parts, it
was broken and turned with spades and.hoes. Nearly all the
surface was covered with gravel from the adjoining knolls, from
one to twelve inches deep, according to position—making an
average coating of material from the upland of five or six
inches in depth. This was intermingled with the soil of the
meadow, as thoroughly as it could conveniently be done.

48 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

a

In May, 1851, the land was again dug over and smoothed as
far as practicable, and then planted with corn, in the ordinary
way, with a common dressing of manure placed in the hill.
The crop of corn was fair, being about fifty bushels of sound
corn tothe acre. It was partially injured by the frosts, the land
being too cold for corn. After the crop was taken off, the land
was levelled and smoothed, with the harrow and hoes. In
March, 1852, it was sown with herds-grass and redtop, just
when moistened with a coating of light snow. But the seed
did not catch well, and the growth that season was light. In
the spring of 1853, the grass started in a promising manner,
and completely covered the ground. No addition of fertilizing
materials was applied. It continued to grow luxuriantly, yield-
ing an abundant crop of excellent grass. On the three acres,
we cut between nine and ten tons of hay at the first mowing,
and full three tons at the second, being an average amount
of four tons to the acre, for the season,—the best hay product
grown on the farm.

Some additional improvements have been made since, by com-
pleting the arrangement of the ditches, so as effectually to let
off all the surplus water,—which is now drained to about
eighteen inches below the surface of the land,—and by arrang-
ing conduits, or fluid conductors, from the backyard of the
house, and the hog-yard, so as to convey the liquids from these
establishments to the meadow, which being done, it is not easy
to estimate the quantity of grass that may be grown thereon.
It is safe to say that four tons to the acre can be grown
annually, without any other dressing.

When it is considered that all this has been done on a worth-
less bog, without any extravagant expenditure, chiefly by the
aid of the inmates of the house, I feel a pride in presenting it
to the notice of the committee and society; both because of its
being a valuable improvement on the farm, and as an exemplifi-
cation to others of what patience and perseverance will accom-
plish. Having no personal interest in the matter, I feel that
I may, without any impropriety, so far boast of what has been

done.

Danvers, October 27, 1853.

RECLAIMED MEADOWS. 49

I, Wingate Merrill, chairman of the Overseers of the Poor,
in Danvers, having been fully acquainted with all the opera-
tions above detailed, the same having been executed with the
approbation of the Board of Overseers, am clearly of the
opinion that the crop, the present season, has not been over-
estimated by Mr. Page, the master of the house.

Royal A. Meriam’s Statement.

In the year 1808, forty-five years ago, a piece of worthless
meadow, the most worthless of any land on the farm, was oper-
ated upon, (probably one of the first efforts made in the county
for redeeming bog meadows,) by covering with gravel and about
two inches of loam from the roadside, and sowing down to:
English grass, and I have never known this land to produce:
less than one ton of English hay to the acre. This year,.
the crop was larger. A few bunches of meadow grass have
occasionally made their appearance, which have been shaved
off, perhaps half a dozen times.

In 1832, I engaged with some ardor in working over bog
meadow, by levelling up a part of my garden, which bordered
onabog. Some more of the adjacent bog was, at that time,
reclaimed; but I found that I was working at great disadvan-
tage, on account of the superabundant water, and that I could
not do much till my neighbor below should open a drain for
the water. The land, being parsonage, had, like most of such
lands, been suffered to remain in its native state.

Ten or twelve years ago, this parsonage land came into the
possession of Richard Phillips, Jr., who took hold of it in good
earnest, and opened a drain through for about one hundred
rods, cleared off the bushes, and worked over the soil. Six or
eight acres were thus worked over, two of which made an im-
penetrable swamp, inhabited only by reptiles and rabbits, and
from which he cleared off and burned about two hundred tons
of bushes and brambles, and, in the language of the workmen,
“bulls’-heads,” being bunches of serge grass, the bigness of a
flour barrel, and half as high.

This piece of work is thought, by all observers, to be the
greatest improvement that has been made in the town, of late
years, the land being now as productive as any like quantity in

1*

50 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

Topsfield. Some years since it was offered to our society for
premium; only one of the committee, however, visited it, and,
for some informality about the statement, it was rejected.

After Mr. Phillips had so clearly opened the way, I began,
ten years since, the work of reclaiming wet meadow and swamp
land, with which I was surrounded, being on a peninsula, and
joined to him below. I opened a main drain through my
meadow, and bedded up, by cross-ditches, about two acres,
which I should not do again, the cross-ditches and bedding
being unnecessary, grubbing and gravelling being better.

During these ten years, I have grubbed and gravelled over
some half dozen acres of wet meadow and swamp land; making,
together with that of Mr. Phillips, all in one body, twelve
acres, which, from being unproductive, have not failed to pro-
duce, taken together, not less than one ton of hay to the acre,
every year since. The hay is not the best stock hay, but sells
well in the Boston market.

The meadow, which I now offer for consideration, has been
reclaimed about six years. It was covered with bushes ten
feet high, which were grubbed and burned, and the land seeded
down with herds-grass and redtop, and it has produced two
tons to the acre every year since the first. This year we esti-
mated, by weighing one load, that the yield was three tons of
herds-grass, redtop, and other grasses. The expense thirty
dollars per acre. ‘Twenty dollars worth of fuel was preserved
from two acres, in pine stumps and roots.

Now, if the reclaiming of these half dozen acres within a
stone’s throw of our dwelling, added to as many more adjoin-
ing, all in full view of the public highway, and in the heart of
the village, is no improvement, so far as dollars and cents are
concerned, it is, at least, a relief to the eye, and a gratification
to the taste and feelings of every good farmer who has had
opportunity to observe the change. The damage to the health
of the neighborhood, which so much stagnant water and putre-
faction would make, must be certainly lessened. These re-
claimed lands are exempt from some of the foul weeds of
uplands. I have never seen white weed, lady’s slipper, nor
the Canada thistle, on these lands. They will always make

RECLAIMED MEADOWS. 51

good returns for any kind of dressing, and are not affected by
the season, but yield better, if any thing, in a dry season.

TorsFizLp, July 25th, 1853.

J. F. C. Hayes’ Statement.

The meadow I have offered for consideration, comprises from
one and a half to two acres. One year ago it was a mass of
muck and brush—a forsaken spot. It was rendered wet by
heavy springs rising in the margin of the meadow, which hay-
ing no particular point of accumulation, kept nearly the entire
surface of the meadow in a state of quagmire. I purchased
this lot more for the water than the land; but, to render the
water available, it became necessary to ditch the land. The
ditching was commenced August 25th, 1852. As it progressed,
I became impressed more and more with the idea of making
something of the land. The ditching was completed, including
deep cuts in various directions into the surrounding highland,
and filling the cuts with stone at a cost of about one hundred
and sixty dollars. The ditch through the low ground, probably,
cost not above fifteen dollars.

The operation of ditching completed, that of clearing the
ground of brush and wood was next commenced. This was
done with an eye to economy, bordering on parsimony. Every
stick of the size of the workmen’s thumb, was trimmed and
carted off for firewood. The small brush remaining, was piled
and burned. The wood obtained more than paid the expense
of clearing and ditching.

Having thus arrived at the bottom, my next idea was to put
the meadow ina state of cultivation. My Irishman told me
that the roots must be pulled out and burned. So also said
the farmer, whose opinion I solicited. J was neither a farmer
nor the son of a farmer, but I knew something of the nature
of soils; and after getting the advice of many, I determined to
follow my own inclination. The meadow on the north side of
the ditch, I concluded to treat in the usual way; while that
on the south side should be treated as I conceived to be the
best way.

I accordingly commenced covering the stumps on the south

52 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

side of the ditch with turf, muck and loam, taken from the lot
adjoining where Lowell Street has since been graded. The
turf was cut by sharp spades, taken in barrows and placed
bottom up, directly upon the top of the meadow. The loose
earth left in taking up the turf, was then spread over the top
of this turf, and made level with a hoe. This done, the labor
of reclaiming was completed for the time being. In this con-
dition, with no manure, and without ploughing or spading,
the ground was planted last spring. It has produced good
corn, peas, beans turnips, ruta-bagas, cabbages, carrots, pars-
nips, &c. Indeed, every thing has grown luxuriantly, except
the onion; the potato grew finely until the rust put a check
to it.

The cost of covering is, perhaps, something greater than that
of clearing. But it is the best way, for the reason that what-
ever ammonia is found in wet land, as is this of mine, like the
cream upon a pan of milk, must be near the top. Hence, if we
remove the turf, the best portion is taken away. By putting
the top of one lot upon that of another, its natural productive-
ness must be increased. The effect of this mode of procedure,
is best told by the produce. The produce of the covered, com-
pared with that of the cleared portion of my ground, is at least
four to one. The covering process is quite effectual, in killing
the growth of most kinds of brush wood. The elder and sweet-
briar alone, have made their way through the turf, and coming
as they must through several inches of earth, they are easily
pulled out by the hand, or yield readily before the hoe. The
cost of covering an acre of ground to the depth of six inches,
when the run for the barrows is not over fifty feet, on an
average for the lot, cannot exceed fifty dollars. The covering
of my lot cost even less than this, as the weather was “freezing
cold,’ during most of the time it was being performed, and
each man made rapid work for the comfort of it.

Mr. Stowell will carry to the fair, samples of the various
kinds of vegetables raised on the above patch of ground, during
the present year. Next year we shall cultivate with the aid of
manure, and with more yee apportioning to each vegetable
its proper limits.

Lawrence, September 10, 1853.

RECLAIMED MEADOWS. 53

Mark H. Davis’s Statement.

I submit for consideration my operations on one acre of
meadow land on the farm of Lewis Allen, in Danvers, that
has been under my care and improvement for three years last
past.

In July, 1850, I began to invert the sod by the use of a
plough, but the mud was so soft that the oxen could not stand
in the furrow. Consequently, I made use of a pair of wheels
that the oxen might travel on the sward, and then I cut the
furrows to the depth of ten or twelve inches. This meadow
has a peat bottom—some parts of it are so soft that I could
work only in the driest part of the season. In September,
1851, I put a coating of tanner’s manure, in which were min-
gled hair and lime, on about half the lot, and sowed herds-
grass and redtop thereon. In July, 1852, this part, measuring
seventy rods, yielded one and three-quarters tons of hay, of
first rate quality, as estimated by those who saw it.

In August, 1852, I prepared the remainder of the lot, by
applying barn and night manure; the difference was observable
all the season—the appearance being much the best where the
barn and night manure were used. I have taken from the
ditches fifty cart loads of mud that I estimate to be worth
fifteen dollars, for upland dressing. The crop was injured the
present year, by the heavy fall of rain, about the 25th of May,
which caused the water to overflow and stand upon some parts
of the land, the effect of which was perceptible all through the
season.

I have sold 4,510 pounds of hay from the landfor . $45 96
And have left what I estimate half a ton at . ~ | 2000

Making the entire product of 1853 to amount to . $55 96
The product of the previous year was sold for . 36 00

Amount of product for two years . ‘ é . $91 96
I estimate the expense incurred as follows :—
Labor, ‘ : : . , . $14 00
Manure, ‘ 3 ‘ ° i 4) 80, 00

54: MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

Grass seed, * $2 52
Cutting and making a $2. 50 per ton, . 11 25
$37 TT
Net income of the land, . ; ; : $54 19

Danvers, September 28, 1853.

Stephen Blaney’s Statement.

I present for inspection and premium, (if thought worthy of

it,) a piece of reclaimed swamp, containing one and a half
acres. It is situated in Salem, near the Sheep Pasture, (so
called.) About six years since, it was a coarse, rough, unpro-
ductive swamp, of alders, blueberries, and other bushes, with
more hassocks and holes than could well be counted, and a
sufficiency of water to render it impassable for man or beast.
These bushes were cut and cleared, and the surface left naked,
and as unsightly and forbidding as possible.
’ Early in September, 1852, I cut a two-foot ditch through the
centre, to let off the surplus water. I then carried on gravel
and loam, from the shores adjoining, about two hundred cart
loads, and filled the holes and cavities, so as to make the
surface as even as I could. IL applied about twelve cords of
compost, made of glue grounds and meadow muck, about equal
quantities of each; spreading it uniformly over the surface. I
employed M. H. Davis, two days, with his team of three cattle,
and inverted the sod to the depth of ten inches.and afterwards
I picked out the stumps and roots, and smoothed the surface.
Hight cords of compost, collected from the refuse about my
wool and morocco factories, were then applied and mingled
with the soil, by the use of the harrow. Mr. Davis then sowed
it down to grass, using two bushels of redtop, and three pecks
of herds-grass seed. A brush was used to smooth the surface,
it being too soft to support the roller. The work was thor-
oughly and neatly done, and thus far, completed in September
last year. The seed sown came up thick and promised well.

In July the present year, I mowed and sold the first crop,
being 4 tons 1,170 lbs., on the ground, at eighteen dollars per
ton. Subsequently, I mowed and gathered to my barn, a
second crop of two and ahalf tons, of first quality fodder.

RECLAIMED MEADOWS. 55

The whole amount of hay gathered from this piece, of one and
a half acres, in one year, after the turf was inverted, was seven
tons, 170 lbs., or four and two-thirds tons to the acre. I
estimate the value of this hay, as it now sells at twenty dollars
per ton, amounting to . : ; : : . $141 70

Incidental expenses, viz. :—

Grubbing, smoothing, and clearing, fifteen days’
labor, at one dollar per day, . . - $15 00

Paid for ploughing, : ; . ot ht 2B
Compost applied, estimated a 4 ; . 20 00
Paid for grass seed, . : io? § 4628
Labor in curing the crop, at two delians per

OTE ha . 16 50
Other services on a abort ita field, nie ing

on the manure, &c., say . . : - 10 00

Total amount of cost of cultivating, ‘ : 0 «ssa eat

Balance, net income for the year, . , ‘ ; $68 95

I estimate the land worth three hundred dollars an acre,
(because it will command that price.) Before I commenced
the improvement it yielded nothing. If any of the farmers—
for I do not profess to be one—have done better with their
lands, I should like to see how it has been done. Those who
saw the grass growing, of whom were several intelligent
observers of such culture, spoke of it as being as successful an
experiment as they have ever seen.

Satem, November 14, 1853.

James Taylor's Statement.

The piece of bog meadow to which I invite your atten-
tion, contains about thirty-three acres. I bought the lot
in 1847, for which I paid twelve dollars an acre. This
meadow had formerly been covered with a heavy growth of
wood, consisting of maple, birch, and spruce. The principal
part was cut off about six or eight yearsago. There was some
wood ona part of it that I cut, that brought me one hundred
and sixty-eight dollars, besides paying for chopping.

56 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURHE.

I began ditching in 1847, and finished in 1852. I

began to bog in 1848 and finished in 1853. Ihave

dug four hundred and eighteen rods of open ditch

at a cost of 20 cents per rod, 2 : : . S8s 200
150 rods of blind ditch at 50 cents per rod, : . 1S 00
I have bogged 23 acres at a cost of $28 per acre, . 644 00

$802 50
In 1849, I planted five acres with potatoes. I put
thirteen loads of compost manure to the acre, in the
hill, on four and a half acres, at a cost of one dollar
per load, $50. I dug the potatoes the last of
August, and the first of September, which I sold on
the ground for $85 an acre, : : , . 425 00

I calculated I lost eighteen barrels, besides, by rot.

In 1850, I planted eight and a-half acres of potatoes.

I manured four and a half acres with compost man-

ure, twenty loads to the acre, cost one dollar per

load. I sold the same in June, as HY were, for

fifty dollars an acre, . ‘ . 425 00
I planted half an acre with corn, te on seven rea

of compost manure in the hill, had twenty bushels

of corn, ‘ é ‘ ; ‘ : . «i oO 20D

$445 00

In 1851, I planted two and a half acres with corn.

Spread on twenty loads of compost manure to the

acre, cost one dollar per load. I had forty-five

bushels of good sound corn to the acre, < - Liga
Cows’ fodder, ten dollars per acre, . : - 20708

Planted seven and ahalf acres with potatoes atta
any manure, which I sold on the ground, after being
dug, for eighty dollars an acre, _ . . 600 00
I calculated I lost besides, by rot, ten pereee,

Tn the fall of 1850, I sowed down six and ahalf acres
to grass, with half a peck of herds-grass and one
peck of redtop to the acre. This fall I cut twelve

RECLAIMED MEADOWS. 57
tons of hay that I sold at the barn for ten dollars
a ton, . : . $120 00
I fed the rest, and sovnidered the feed worth 20 00
$872 00
In 1852 I let four acres for, 65 00
I planted six and a half with potatoes Pathout oe
manure, which I sold on the ground, after being dug,
for seventy-five dollars per acre, . 487 50
I planted two-thirds of an acre with corn iam
manure, had thirty-five bushels of good sound corn, 35 00
Sold the fodder for $8, 8 00
Cut on the six and a half acres ae eTass wes ee of
hay, which I sold at the barn for eighteen dollars
per ton, F i c : 180 00
Feed, 20 00
$795 50
In 1853 I let seven and three-quarters acres for, 215 00
I planted five and a half acres with potatoes, which I
sold on the ground, after being dug, for fifty dollars
per acre, 275 00
I calculated I lost forty barr al, besides by ‘ot
I sold the grass standing on the six and a half acres
for 184 00
$674 00
Calculated the feed worth, 40 00
$714 00
Last winter I put on to the six and a half acres of
grass two hundred and sixty loads of clear gravel,
and one hundred and thirty loads of compost
manure, which is the first that has been put on since
it was sown down; the expense of putting on this
gravel was $70; compost $130, 200. 00
100 00

Other incidental expenses,

g*

58 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

In 1851 I sold to my brother about thirteen acres for $600,
and twenty acres left, which is all bog.

Car.isLe, September, 1853.
WORCESTER.

Statement of T. §& I. S. Meriam.

We have two methods of reclaiming our swamp lands. One
is to plant potatoes, and cultivate the swamp in this way for
two or three years until the old turf is fully rotted—using
eare to take all roots and stumps out, so as to be able to leave
a smooth surface at the time of seeding, which is usually done
in the fall as soon as we can get the crop of potatoes off.
The other is to cart or sled on gravel in the winter when the
swamp is frozen enough to bear up a team; we have about five
acres reclaimed in this way, and two reclaimed in the other
manner. But as we did not call the attention of the commit-
tee to but two pieces of improved swamp, we shall confine our-
selves to them. They contain about one and half acres each.

The lot which we shall call No. 1, was covered over with gravel
in the winter of 1845, about five inches thick, spread at the
time of carting; there being but little snow at the time, we
could spread it even. We seeded with herds-grass and redtop
the last of March following, using one peck and a half herds-
grass, and half a bushel of redtop to the acre. The first sea-
son, we had but little hay, but it was very thick. In 1849 we
applied about six loads of compost manure to the acre, and
have cut about two and a half tons of hay to the acre every
year since 1847. Cost of gravelling was forty-four days’ work
for one man and one yoke of oxen, in the short days of winter,
and after taking care of a stock of cattle; we think that fifty
cents a day for man, and the same for oxen, a fair price, so that
the expense was but $44 for the one acre and a half.

Lot No. 2, contains one acre and a half, that has been planted
three years with potatoes. In February, 1849, we sledded on
twenty loads of manure from under the stable—it was frozen
at the time, and we think it would not have been over fifteen
cart loads, such as we usually get out in the spring. This
piece had been mowed the year before, although we got the

RECLAIMED MEADOWS. 59

very poorest kind of grass where it was not covered with
brush and stumps. We dropped the potatoes on the top of
the stubble, put the manure on, planted in drills, and turned
the turf on to the potatoes with spades, and did nothing more
to them until we dug them—we dug one hundred and _ thirty
bushels of potatoes. Labor of two men five days each, at
eighty-five cents a day to plant, and two men four days each at
eighty-five cents a day to dig them. We planted again in
1850, at about the same expense for planting and digging, but
as the potatoes rotted badly, we obtained only about twenty-
five bushels of good potatoes. Have used no manure on the
lot since the first year, except plaster at the time of planting.
In 1851 planted again to potatoes, at about the same cost as
the two other years, and had one hundred and forty bushels of
good potatoes, which were dug early in October. We then
seeded down to grass. In 1852 we mowed it and got about
two tons of hay. In 1853, this season, we obtained, as near
as we could estimate it, four and a half tons from the acre and
a half.

We have improved our interval or meadow land by plough-
ing it the last of August or first of September, using care to
turn the sward over smooth, and when it cannot be well done
with the plough, have it done in some other way, but have it
done, and then have it well rolled; put on twenty cart loads
of good manure to the acre, spread evenly, and sow the hay
seed—using about one peck and a half of herds-grass and a
half a bushel of redtop to the acre. Harrow thoroughly
lengthwise of the furrow and roll it down. We have usually
got two tons of hay to the acre the first year, and not unfre-
quently two and a half tons.

We have another piece near the road of about four acres
which, a few years since, was covered with bunches of brush
and produced but very little grass. We have cleared off the
brush, ditched it and smoothed the surface with the plough,
seeding down in the fall. We irrigate it all we can with a
small stream that runs through it, and now it is a fine piece of
mowing, and produces a good crop of hay.

AvsBurn, October 24, 1853.

60 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

HAMPSHIRE, FRANKLIN AND HAMPDEN.

Statement of Edmund Smith.

The piece of swamp meadow which I offer for your atten-
tion is situated in the east part of Hadley, containing nineteen
and a half acres. I purchased it in 1840, for twelve dollars
and fifty cents per acre. Six acres, at the west end of the lot,
was swamp mowing land, except an acre on the south side,
which was called “high land,” fit for tillage. These six acres
had been rented for nine dollars per year. The east part of
the lot was a brush pasture. This piece of land lies at the
south end of a large tract of swamp—being the lowest part.
The water stood in so large a quantity in the spring of the
year, that nothing of any value wouid grow. In October of
1840, I mowed the brush on four acres on the south side of the
pasture and ploughed it. The next May, it was planted with
corn, manured in the hill, and a good crop was secured. Oats
and hay seed were sown the next season, and a good crop of
oats followed. It mowed well the next season. I made a
ditch across the lot north and south—in 1842 I think—which
took off a great part of the water from the meadow. I think
it was in the last of May, 1843, that I ploughed two acres of
this low meadow. The furrows drained it to the south, and a
ditch then conducted the water to the main ditch. Potatoes,
manured in the hill, were planted, yielding a good crop. The
next spring I spread on manure, cultivated and harrowed in
oats and hay seed without ploughing. The oats were light,
the hay came in well. This piece of land I mowed six years,
obtaining a ton and one half per acre, yearly. I mowed the brush
in 1843, the last part of the season, on three acres east of the
ditch in the lowest part of the land on the lot. Two years
after mowing the brush, I mowed the land on which the water
stood through the spring and first part of the summer, in such
quantity that the hay mowed was of no value. The season in
August, 1845, being very dry, I dug the stumps on this three
acres, and put them into a fence. In the same month I ploughed
this piece of land with four yokes of oxen and a large plough,

RECLAIMED MEADOWS. 61

turning the furrow handsomely ten inches deep, and occupying
eight days with the labor. The lands were four rods wide;
and the furrows drained the water to the ditch which crossed
the lot, and left the land dry. The next spring it was sowed
with oats, herds-grass, redtop and clover seed, producing a
geood crop of oats. The grass sced took well, and yielded a
ton and one half of good hay, to the acre, for five years after
it was seeded, without any manure. Three years ago I planted
three-quarters of an acre of this land with potatoes, manured
in the hill, producing a good crop. The next spring it was
sown with oats, seeded with grass seed without manure; and
the two last seasons I have mowed at the rate of two tons of
good hay, to the acre. Last fall, the remainder of this piece
was ploughed, and about the middle of May last, planted with
Indian corn, manured in the hill with ‘seven cartloads to the
acre; five bushels of shell lime and half a bushel of plaster
to the acre, dropped in the hills. I think there were sixty
bushels of shelled corn, to the acre.

Five years ago, I made a ditch sixty rods on the north side
of the lot, as far east as the woods, which helps the north side
of the lot very much. There is one acre and a half of wood-
land on this lot, eighteen acres mowing and tillage land. I
have, for a few years past, planted three or four acres, and
sowed about as much with oats, and seeded with grass seed.
The crops on this eighteen acres last year, were. ten tons of
good, and four tons of poor hay, one hundred and fifty bushels
of corn, and thirty bushels of oats. The crops this year, were
one hundred and seventy-five bushels of corn, one hundred and
fifty bushels of oats, twenty bushels of rye, eight tons of
good hay, and three tons of poor hay. The wood paid for the
labor of cutting the brush—one acre which I cleared, yielding
very good wood. From the remainder, the wood and timber
had been cut off, and it had grown up to alders and white
bushes, covered with moss.

Hanptey, Noy. 8th, 1853.

62 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

HAMPSHIRE.

Report of the Committee.

The word meadow, in its first sense, signifies flat, depressed
land, generally lying upon the banks of a brook, or river; as
for example, the meadows on the banks of the Connecticut
River, or upon Muddy, Flat or Beaver Brooks in the eastern
part of this county. Meadow land does not, necessarily, imply
wet land, neither does it exclude such, as those will admit who
have observed the grounds situated near the streams here
named. Meadow is sometimes, though improperly, used as a
synonym of the word swamp, signifying low, spongy ground,
soft in consequence of the water’s being suffered to remain,
where draining has not been employed to remove it. These
are usually seen interspersed among the hills of the four western
counties of this State. The term swale is used among the
farmers in the same sense as the word swamp, as here defined.
Such land, as is indicated by the words swamp and swale, has
been regarded as more or less valuable, according to the quan-
tity and quality of the grass produced. It not unfrequently
holds the water that falls upon it, as well as that which runs in
from the surrounding hills, bringing down, often, the choicest
mineral elements of the soil, which sink beneath the water,
and are. thus rendered nearly worthless until the water is
drained off.

The more solid matter, found in a swamp, when drained is,
sometimes, peat; a substance of vegetable origin, morc or less
saturated with water, consisting of roots and fibres in almost
every stage of decomposition, from the natural woody substance
to the almost perfect black vegetable mould. Mr. Shipman’s
reclaimed swamp, in Hadley, furnishes one of the best specimens
of this quality, that has come under the observation of the,
committee.

Mud, such as is found in some of these swamps, is a moist
soft earth, differing essentially from peat. Swale mud is more
thoroughly decomposed than peat, and resembles it less than it
does muck, a decomposition of vegetable matter—more com-
pletely disorganized than peat. It is not so easy to draw a

RECLAIMED MEADOWS. 63

dividing line between swamp mud and muck as it is to use the
two words. The difference between them and peat is very dis-
tinct and marked. Mud and muck scem, generally, to be so
entirely disorganized as to leave scarce a trace of vegetable _
substance, and, in some cases, none whatever. The mud in the
lowest parts of the land bordering upon the brooks, in the
eastern part of this county, is of this kind, and is so deep that
a hay-pole, twelve feet in length, may be pressed into it without
touching bottom.

Whether these mud swamps will ever be drained, it will be,
probably, for some future generation to determine. If the work
is ever accomplished, it will be done by grcat expenditure of
money and labor. When drained, they will furnish most valua-
ble lands for tillage, which, in their unreclaimed state, are nearly
valueless, except as a dwelling-place for toads, frogs, snakes,
moles, snipes, woodcock and blackbirds. Alas, for this numer-
ous hoard of swamp aborigines, when these low lands shall be
reclaimed from the dominion of water, and turned into rich
fields of the very best tillage land, of which New England can
boast. This is no groundless speculation. Mr. Shipman’s re-
claimed land, in Hadley, is, this very day, worth more per acre
than the very best meadow land in the world-renowned Connec-
ticut Valley, for the reason, that a given amount of labor and
manure will produce more tobacco, more Indian corn, or broom-
corn, or potatoes, than the same expenditure will yield on the
best alluvial on the river of pines. Such a fact should cause —
every man who owns a peat swamp to smile in view of his
treasure. For, when drained, it may be rendered not only very
productive, but will furnish, also, material to reclaim worn-out
old fields. Many are beginning to believe that these lands,
that have been deemed worthless swamps, are the most desira-
ble for improvement.

The day is not far distant when a good farmer will be ashamed
of his neighbor, whose unreclaimed swamp furnishes a dwelling
place, through the warm season, for croaking frogs, toads and
peepers. The time is at hand, it is hoped, when all the swamps
and swales of Massachusetts will be drained and tilled, and
thus rendered productive. Many acres in this county have
already been reclaimed, and made to bear much produce.

64 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

There are more, however, that remain unreclaimed and un-
productive.

Four entries, of what were called reclaimed meadows, were
made. The committee viewed them all. Only two pieces came
within their province, to wit, those entered by Messrs. Mon-
tague and Smith.

L. WETHERELL, Chairman.

Statement cf Albert Montague.

I offer three acres of reclaimed meadow in Sunderland. I
can give an accurate statement of the method and expense of
reclaiming only one acre, and of the amount of produce obtained
therefrom. The entire piece lies in a swamp of about ten
acres, which has been partially drained, from time to time, since
1833. By draining at considerable expense, and overcoming
opposition of neighbors, who were not willing, at first, that I
should cut a drain through their lands—although their lands
became twice as valuable in consequence of the drain—this
whole swamp has been very much improved, and yields much
good feed, as well as much that is sour. My lot of three acres,
to which I invite your special attention, lies near the south end
of this swamp, being as low as any part of it. I mowed it for
a series of years previous to 1852, and obtained a little coarse
bog hay, barely sufficient to pay for my labor.

In August, 1851, immediately after mowing, I commenced
draining more faithfully, and bogging it evenly, to fit it for the
plough, as* most of the stumps had already been removed. I
then ploughed, about seven inches deep, taking pains to have it
well turned, and the furrows le nearly flat. I turned up some
two or three. inches of muck, which lay until May, 1852, and
being then well pulverized with a harrow, I was enabled to
cultivate it without much expense.

I planted on the 22d of May, spread a light coat of manure,
composted of barnyard manure and sand, in equal proportions,
using at the rate of eight loads of compost to the acre. I
added twelve bushels of ashes to the acre, putting them in the
hill. I planted Indian corn, hoed three times, and cultivated
between the rows. Just before the last hoeing, I sowed grass
seed at the rate of one peck of herds-grass, four quarts of red-

RECLAIMED MEADOWS. 65

top, and five pounds of clover to the acre, and mixed in a little
turnip seed. I cut my corn September 18th, and husked about
the middle of October, one hundred and fifty-seven bushels of
good ears of corn, on one acre, and about three tons of corn-
fodder. The weight of the fodder was obtained by weighing
one stack, and multiplying it by the number of stacks. I finish-
ed pulling my turnips the 20th of November, and had one
hundred and twenty-five bushels on one acre. In July last I
cut a fair crop of good hay, estimated by competent judges at
two tons to the acre. I think I should have had a greater
crop, had the season been favorable. The muck was dry
enough to burn well a long time before the grass was cut. The
land is now in good condition. The grass thickens so well,
that I expect a heavier crop of hay next season. I have com-
puted the expense of reclaiming one acre from its condition—
in August, 1851—when it was drained and the stumps removed.

Produce :-—
78 bushels corn, at 834 cents, . : » $65.00
3 tons corn fodder, at $6, . 4 F : 18 00

125 bushels turnips, at 123 cents, : i 15 62
2 tons hay, at $7 per ton, . : ; : 14 00

—$112 62
Expenses :—

Bogeging and moving bogs, . 3 : : $6 00
Draining, . ‘ : 3 3 00
Ploughing and harrowing, . ; ; : 6 00
Manures, compost and ashes, _ . 5 . 10 00
Planting and hoeing three times, : : 5 00
Grass seed, : ; : ‘ Fs 1 50
Corn, ; é ; : ; : : 6 00
Purnips, . 5 : : : : : 3 00
Hay seed, . : : : . : : 2 50

—— 45 00

Net gain on one acre, . : ; ! . $69 62

To this might be added the value of the land, or nearly so,
for before I commenced in August, 1851, there was no net in-
crease from it—the bog hay barely paid the labor of getting it.

g*

66 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

P?

Statement of Edmund Smith.

The piece of meadow which I offer for premium, contains
about three acres, in Hadley. It is the centre of a lot of nine-
teen acres and a-half, which I bought in 1840, and which was
then worth five dollars per acre. There was some wood on the
north side—the south side was higher, and part had been
ploughed. In 1842 I mowed the brush to see if I could make
a piece of swamp-mowing; but it proved worthless, in conse-
quence of the water flowing from a large tract of swamp on the
north side. It was so wet, that nothing grew of any value. I
had cut a ditch, west of this piece of land, running north and
south across the lot, which took off some of the water. The
season was very dry in August, 1845, and I thought I would
try the experiment of ploughing. I dug the stumps and put
them into a fence—used a large plough, drawn by four yoke of
oxen, and had a man with a bog hoe to relieve the plough
whenever it clogged or stopped. We were eight days plough-
ing three acres, ten inches deep, beds four rods wide. The
furrows drained off the water into the ditch on the west side.
The next spring I sowed oats and hay seed, at the rate of eight
quarts of herds-grass, three pounds of clover, and four quarts of
redtop seed to the acre. The crop of oats was better than I
expected. The hay seed came up well. For four or five years
after it was seeded, I think there was at the rate of one and a
half tons of hay to the acre, worth six dollars per ton, standing.
The north Jand—about three-fourths of an acre—I ploughed and
planted in the summer of 1850, with potatoes and broomcorn,
manuring in the hill. The next spring I sowed oats and hay
seed—had a good crop of oats—the hay seed came up well.
I cut from this piece, the past two seasons, at the rate of two
tons of good hay to the acre, and have never manured it, except
in 1846. The remainder of the three acres I ploughed last
fall, about eight inches deep. It was planted in May, and
manured in the hill with oyster shell lime and plaster. I think
the crop equal to fifty bushels or more of shelled corn to the -
acre. The land, since it was first planted, has yielded a yearly
income of six dollars per acre; but the last two years the
income has heen greater.

RECLAIMED MEADOWS. 67

Result :-—
Present value of the land, $50 per acre, . : . $150 00
Expenses :—
First cost, at $5 per acre, ; : : $15 00
Clearing brush and stumps, . ‘ : 20 00

Ploughing, 3 : : - : : 30 00
—— $65 00

Net profit, : ; ; : ; i . $85 00
Haptey, Mass.

HAMPDEN.

Statement of S. FE. Merrick, Jr.

The meadow offered for your inspection is a low, irregular
swale of eight acres—about one-half of the work is completed.

We commenced, August 11, 1851, by digging a main drain in
the centre, six feet wide, eighteen inches at the lower end, and
gradually increasing to the depth of between four and five feet.
The muck varied from eighteen inches to four feet; care was
taken first to bog the sides of the ditch, as it makes it easier
to remove the bogs and earth. The bogs and muck were
thrown on one side; the gravel opposite. The banks were cut
‘almost perpendicular, to increase the quantity of gravel and to
secure the greater durability of the drain. The next object
was to drain off the water that came in from the side; although
there is considerable fall, so great was the quantity, that it
destroyed nearly all vegetation except moss; and there was
plenty of that, and now and then a patch of cranberries. Near
the lower end of the main drain we commenced an under-drain
(digging it as narrow as could be conveniently worked) running
at right angles with the main drain directly to the upland,
quite into the hard and solid ground. Experience has taught
that the nearer the upland (within certain limits) the nearer
will the water be to the surface, and the less hard pan to pene-
trate. This ditch was dug the same depth with the main drain,
and increasing, as we neared the upland, to the depth of five or
six feet; we intended to go down to quicksand the whole length

68 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

of the drain; this ditchwas then laid down with stone chips,
but they were afterwards mostly taken up and tiles put in
their place; stone will do in hard pan very well.

After this ditch was complete, the land was bogged, the sand
from the main drain spread, and by the aid of scraper and
shovel, well covered with loam and sand: a large part was
ploughed; it was then all well dragged, at least two days to
the acre, a light coat of compost or fresh manure added; then
stocked, dragged and bushed. We then raked all the light
sods and roots with a hand rake and the work was complete.
We experienced more than ordinary difficulty on account of
having to keep the water ata certain height to convey to
another meadow below for irrigation. We ran the under-
drain along the bank till the fall decreased so as to render it
advisable to have recourse to the main drain by another perpen-
dicular. We find the best course to pursue is to mark out by
an under-drain as much as can be completed in one season, and
then commence again at the main drain. We find where the
land is not ploughed it is necessary to cut the bogs very close,
or rather to completely skin the land. We find it better to
plough ever so slightly, as the sand can be more readily mixed
with the soil, and if dragged in the right state the turf will all
drag to pieces, and that which will not drag to pieces, ought
always to be removed. Bogs will grow in quite a dry soil, if
they be well rooted; therefore it is quite important to
thoroughly subdue the old sod before you attempt to make a
new one. Ihave numbered the pieces as they were finished.
No. 1 contains about three-fourths of an acre, lies between the
main drain and a drain that conveys the water along the
upland to a meadow below not ploughed; sanded by spreading
the bank of ditch; finished sometime in October, 1851; seeded
one-half pound Timothy, one-half pound festuca-pratensis; the
festuca somewhat killed out but came in to redtop and June
erass.

But in 1852, twenty-five large cocks, being light and leafy,
would not weigh over ten hundred. In 1853, cut thirty-five
hundred, and a large crop of rowen now on the ground.

No. 2 contains over an acre, lies opposite side of main drain
with under-drain along bank; was partially fitted in the fall.

RECLAIMED MEADOWS. 69

Mostly ploughed and fitted in the spring of 1852, stocked with
millet, herds-grass, festuca, clover, and blue grass, (I never
intend to sow any more clover on meadow land,) had a large
crop of millet averaging six feet in height. Cut in 1853 three
large loads, over two tons of hay, and a heavy crop of rowen
now on the ground.

Wireranam, Mass.

HOUSATONIC.

Report of the Committee.

There were eleven entries of lands in the year 1850, all of
which your committee viewed in the autumn of said year, and
have again viewed said lands the present season.

The whole quantity thus presented for our consideration,
will not vary much from seventy-five acres, a majority of which
was partially drained, and other portions of the work of re-
claiming more or less in progress at the time of our first view
in 1850.

Another portion of said lands was quite thoroughly re-
claimed, having had crops of grass and other productions either
taken off or growing upon them at that time.

The improvement of the latter portion of said lands was
very praiseworthy and valuable, but your committee do not
consider them as coming fairly within the rules and regulations
of the society as competitors for premium. We have not,
therefore, taken into account those pieces of land which were
nearly or wholly reclaimed and made productive before your
society had taken any action on this subject, believing it to be
the intention of the society that the improvements should be
nearly, or wholly made after they were entered to the secre-
tary of the society as competitors for premium.

In their action on this subject, your committee have endeavy-
ored to keep in view the most expeditious and economical
method of reclaiming these lands to a state of productiveness
and value.

We have found it difficult to form a satisfactory opinion of
what is the best, most economical, and quickest method of

70 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

accomplishing the end in view, owing to the great variety of
soils, and obstacles to be overcome; they being quite as valu-
able and numerous as the pieces of land which have come un-
der observation.

Those which we have viewed, with a single exception, after
having been drained and the bogs and brush cut off, have been
subdued by repeated ploughing and harrowing, which is a very
slow process of reducing the foul grasses and other substances,
and the unyielding qualities of such soils, more particularly
when there is great dampness, which is most usually the case
in such lands, be they ever so thoroughly drained.

This may be a good method where there is little inclination
to wetness in the soil and not much inclined to coarse grasses
and bushes. But where these obstacles do exist to much
extent, your committee are fully of the opinion, that after
thoroughly draining, the best method is to float or cut off the
whole surface of the ground, throw it into winrows, and burn
it on the ground. This method, although it may appear very
slow and expensive, we are satisfied is the quickest, the most
thorough, and taking all things into the account, we believe to
be the most economical mode of reducing such lands to a state
of useful productiveness.

The ashes, which will be produced in great quantity, when
spread upon the soil, afford the best of manure which can be
produced. All the coarser materials of the land are at once
reduced by fire, and are not only more useful as a manure, but
are more thoroughly subdued and reduced than in any other
way. The surface, with slightly ploughing or thoroughly har-
rowing, is much earlier prepared for a crop than by the other
method, gaining one or two years out of three or four in the
use and production of the land over that of subduing by the
plough. Your committee, from the limited observation which
they have been able to make, would not fail to recommend this
method of reclaiming lands of this character in preference to
any other, always keeping in view that the land should be
thoroughly drained before the operation is commenced.

We believe that the premiums offered by the society for the
reclaiming of such lands, are having a beneficial effect, and are
operating as a stimulus to those who possess them, to exert

RECLAIMED MEADOWS. Tl

themselves to bring them into a state of productiveness and
value.

Your committee have awarded to Mr. Orange Smith, of
Egremont, the first premium of $15, for the greatest improve-
ment on five acres of wet, swampy, unproductive land, by bring-
ing the same into a state of productiveness.

Mr. Smith’s improvement embraces between seven and eight
acres in quantity. This land, was, on our first view, wholly
unproductive. From his representations, after he had drained
the land and cut off the brush and bogs, and dug and carried off
the stumps and roots, the remainder of the work was mainly
done with the plough and harrow. The amount expended,
including board of workmen, grass and other seeds sown,
about 4 , : 4 é i 4 ; $200 00

The amount of the value of crops taken off the

same land up to this time, exclusive of a crop
of buckwheat, now on a part of said land,
which is unpromising owing to the season,
amounts to about : : : : : $75 00

$125 00

Leaving a balance against him of $125, or about sixteen dol-
lars the acre. The land is now seeded to grass, and bids fair
to be productive in future.

We further award to Frederick F. Cooper, of Sheffield, for
the greatest improvement on three acres of such land, the sum
of $10.

This is a part of a swamp of thirty acres, which Mr. Cooper
has now under process of reclaiming, which, after cutting off
the bogs and draining, was mainly performed by the plough and
harrow.

The expense, as rendered by Mr. Cooper to us,

including grass, and other seed, is , : $50 90

The crops taken from the land within three
years, he estimates at . : : ‘ : 64 00
$13 10

Leaving a balance of $13.10 in his favor, after paying all
expenses.

72 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

We further award to Mr. Harvey Royce, of Sheffield, a pre-
mium of $5 for the greatest improvement of one acre of such
land.

The improvement of Mr. Royce embraces about one and one-
half acres in quantity, on our view in 1850. The surface was
covered with a very thick growth of white-bush, coarse grasses
and brakes; the soil a deep muck, and wholly unproductive ;
the water wholly taken off by draining. The manner of reclaim-
ing this piece of land, as given us by Mr. Royce, was by wholly
paring off the surface, throwing it into winrows and burning it
on the ground, and spreading the ashes over the land, and har-
rowing it over and sowing it to grass seed. This was all done
the last fall, or in 1852, and he has cut a crop of hay from the
land this season, of one ton to the acre. It is now in good
turf, and bids fair to be very productive, more thoroughly
reclaimed, to appearance, than any piece we have viewed.

The expense of ditching, cutting, pulling and
burning the white-bush, &c., including grass

seed, is Sate, os : . é $25 62
Crop taken off this season estimated at . 4 7 50
$18 12

Leaving a balance of $18.12 against him, or $12.08 the acre.

All of which is respectfully submitted,

Ratew Taytor, Chairman.

BARNSTABLE.

James G. Hallet’s Statement.

The piece of reclaimed meadow which I present for premium,
is the upper part of about five acres, which I diked in three
years since, which at that time did not produce half a ton of
any kind of hay. The manner of treatment has been as fol-
lows :—the first year it was ploughed and planted with potatoes,
and the next spring put down to grass. On the outside of my
barn IJ have a vat forty feet long, eight feet wide, and four and
a half feet deep, which is water tight and receives all the urine
and liquid excrements from the cattle, which are stalled every

IMPROVING PASTURE LAND. 73

night through the year. Into this vat I carted red sand and
allowed it to remain until well saturated, and then applied it as
a top-dressing. The result is below.
YarmovutH Port, July 23, 1858.
This is to certify that I have measured a piece of reclaimed
meadow belonging to James G. Hallet, which he presents for
premium, and find it contains one hundred and twenty rods.
CHarLes THACHER, Surveyor.
Yarmourn Port, October, 4, 1853.
This is to certify that we have weighed the hay cut on the
piece of meadow measured by Charles Thacher, Esq., belong-
ing to James G. Hallet, and find it four tons, sixteen hundred
and twelve pounds.
Daniet Crocker, & Co., Weighers.

IMPROVING PASTURE LAND.
ESSEX.
Report of the Committee.

If we rightly understand the object of the society in offer-
ing this premium, it is to collect and diffuse such information
upon the management of pasture land, as will give increased
attention to the’subject of grazing land, and not, as some have
thought, to the reclaiming of pasture land for the purpose of
tillage. It is a fact obvious to all, that the pastures have been
neglected in this county for the last thirty years, while increas-
ed attention has been given to our tillage land. Our pastures
have been left to be managed by any boy that was large enough
to let down the bars or shut the gate. It will be an object in
this report to awaken inquiry upon the subject, rather than to
give any particular method for improving our pastures.

What is the cause of the deterioration of our pastures? We
think that many of our pastures have been injured by long-con-
tinued close feeding. Observation has taught us that twitch
grass, that pest of tillage land, will die when closely fed for

Ce

74 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

two or three years; so with many of the grasses in our pastures,
if they are not permitted to mature their seed, they die, and
moss takes their place. If pastures are so situated that they
can be permitted to mature their seed once in three or four
years, and are then closely fed, they will produce much more
than when they are fed all the season. It is not so much
against close feeding that we so much object, as against con-
_tinuing for a series of years, without giving the pasture any
time to rest. We can point to pastures that have been injured,
we think, by not being fed close enough at any time; the briers
and bushes have outgrown the grasses.

“Change of pasture makes fat calves,’ is a maxim which
contains much sound philosophy, and if its teachings were more
heeded, we should have better pastures and cattle. In many
of our pastures it is now literally a struggle for life or death
between the eow and the grass, from spring to autumn, and
often neither has vitality enough to exult in a victory.

But how shall we manage our pasture land? When a farm
is so situated that it can all be conveniently ploughed and
manured, it may be best to change from pasture to tillage. But
upon most of our farms there are portions that cannot be profita-
bly tilled. When such land is covered with moss, we recom-
mend harrowing it in the spring, or warm days in winter, when
the frost is out of the surface from one to two inches, and
sowing erass seed. We prefer the harrow rather than the
plough for land that is to remain in pasture, believing that
nature put the soil right side up for grazing.

In the south-eastern part of the county, the pastures are
injured by a weed that is not found to much extent in other parts.
We refer to wood-waxen, a plant which will have the sole occu-
pancy of the land wherever it gains a foothold. We know not
what resemblance this plant may have to the bush which the
Oriental shepherd saw burning is his pasture on Mount Horeb,
but we know that this is often burned, but not destroyed.

Another method for improving dry, gravelly land for pasture,
is by raising the locust tree. This, unlike most other trees,
improves the quality of the grass, and increases the quantity.
A strong illustration of the benefit of this tree upon pasture
land may be seen upon the farm of John Nichols, in Danvers.

IMPROVING PASTURE LAND. 15

But what shall we do with our cold, rocky, bushy pastures ?
To improve them by ploughing will often cost more than they
will sell for when reclaimed; yet the farmer may be so situated
that it may be well for him to reclaim them. We think, how-
ever, that there is much land in this county, that is now known
by the name of pasture, that might be more profitably used as
woodland. Where the white pie and the birch grow up spon-
taneously, they will in a few years destroy the small bushes, and
when the wood is fit to cut, we shall have a pasture which
nature has renovated.

In the pastures to which the attention of the committee has
been called, plaster has been used as a means for improving
them. It becomes an interesting inquiry to know in what parts
of the county, and on what kind of soils, plaster can be profita-
bly used. Both of the pastures which we viewed were elevated,
and moist, strong soil upon a retentive subsoil. We had the
impression that plaster was best adapted to dry, poor soils;
but from what we have seen and heard this season, we think
that it is the best soils that are improved by it. In conversa-
tion, a short time since, with a gentleman from Bangor, he said
that an accidental experiment, a few years ago, taught him that
they had been acting upon a wrong impression in regard to it
in that vicinity; that they received the most benefit from plas-
ter on good land, well manured; that a greater proportional
increase of crop was obtained when it was applied in addition
to the manure than when applied alone.

If the society shall continue to offer this premium, we would
recommend that it be under the direction of the Committee on
Farms, so that we may have the benefit of the observation of
the committee for a longer time.

Wm. R. Purnam, Chairman.

Joseph How’s Statement.

It is with some hesitation that I offer my pasture lands for
premium, as I have previously given my opinion, and partially
my experience, which have been published in former reports.
But as there has heretofore been no application for premium,
and as last year there was no report from the committee, I

76 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

therefore concluded to ‘offer my pasture for premium, that we
might at least have a report on the subject. And believing, as
I do, that good pasture land is as profitable as most other
lands, at the price at which it is usually valued; that a large
proportion is comparatively of but little income, and that much
of it can be profitably improved, it therefore scems desirable
that individuals should communicate their experience to others,
and it may be expected that some benefits may be derived
therefrom.

My pasture contains in all about seventy acres, and is sub-
divided into smaller pastures by stone wall. The soil may be
termed a gravelly loam, with a mixture of stones, and on some
of it the stones are so abundant that it cannot be conveniently
ploughed. It is somewhat hilly; most of it is rather moist,
although there are some dry knolls. Some of it was old bound
out pasture forty years ago, and from other portions of it the
wood has been taken off at different periods. Some of it was
formerly ploughed and planted with corn, without manure, of
with a very little compost in the hill, then sowed down to
grain and hay seed, which partially improved the pasture for a
short time. We occasionally used some plaster, but fearing
that it might essentially injure the land, we used but little.

About twenty years ago, we commenced using it more freely,
and for the last few years have used it on nearly all our pasture
every year, or once in two years, at the rate of one and a half
or two bushels to the acre. Some of our pasture land is
benefited more than others, but all of it is improved more
or less.

Some years ago I purchased about fourteen acres of land,
one-half of which was covered with wood and bushes, the other
half was an old bound out pasture, which had not been ploughed
for twenty-five years. Previously to that time, it had been
planted and sowed without manure, until it would hardly pay
for cultivation. It had been rented for several years for three
dollars per year, and the person that hired considered it a hard
bargain. During the seven years I have sowed it with plaster
four or five times, and it is now a good pasture. I think the
feed is now worth as much on one acre as on the whole piece
when I purchased it. But I think it is not what it would have

IMPROVING PASTURE LAND. 77

been had it never been ploughed, for land that has once been
worn out by excessive tillage without manure, althouch it may
lay uncultivated or pastured for a long series of years, will not
be what it would have been had it never béen ploughed. About
four acres, which were covered with wood and bushes, have
been cleared, the land sowed with plaster, and it is now a first
rate pasture, far superior (as might be expected) to the old
pasture described above. One cutting of the bushes was suffi-
cient, as it usually is where plaster is used; not that the plaster
in any way prevents the growth of the bushes, but a thick
growth of grass springing up, the cattle, while feeding it, will
also feed the tender sprouts, and soon eradicate the bushes.
Bushes, however, that the cattle will not eat, such as sweet fern,
hard-hack, ground hemlock, &c., will require occasional cutting,
or pulling up by the roots. In the above case, the brush and
bushes were not burned, but rotted on the land, which I think
is much better than burning. The growth of bushes was whor-
tleberry, hazel-nut, witch-hazel, &e.

On a dry part of the pasture, I spread on last year about
three cart loads of mud to the acre, which has improved the
pasture, and I think will pay the expense. The mud was taken
from a pond-hole in the pasture, in August, 1852. It appears
to be rotten vegetable matter, not unlike common meadow
weed, but not peat.

On some of my other pastures I have used leached ashes,
from 150 to 200 bushels to the acre, with good success.

The first of June I had in my pasture thirty-seven cows, four
oxen, one yearling heifer and two horses. It was not long,
however, before the butchers commenced taking away my beef
cows, so that by the time of the severe drought, in August, the
number of my cows was considerably reduced. Thus I had a
tolerably good supply of feed through the dry season, and an
abundance after the rains commenced. But I cannot state
definitely the amount of stock that my pasture would keep
through the season. ‘It is desirable that there should be some
surplus feed in pastures, as close feeding is injurious, and
causes them to deteriorate or bind out.

The increase of the feed is not all the benefit resulting from
improving pasture land, for as the quantity increases the quality

78 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

improves; and if an animal will get fat for the butcher at mid-
summer, instead of running the whole season, the keeping for
one-half the season is saved, while the beef usually sells then
at a higher price.

Meruven, Noy. 15, 1853.

Jacob Farnum’s Statement.

I present to your examination two pastures, one with fifteen
acres and the other with twenty-three. May, 1851, I spread
one ton of plaster on each pasture. In 1852, the expense of
cutting and pulling up savins was about ten dollars. First of
May I spread two tons on each pasture. Cost of plaster pur-
chased at Haverhill, was $5.50 per ton; cost of drawing and
spreading was $2.50 per ton. One pasture is very spongy;
the other is dry. I feel encouraged to try more on my other
pastures.

AnDovER, Noy. 12, 1858.

ORCHARDS.

The interest in the cultivation of fruit has increased to such
a degree that most of the societies offer premiums for orchards
of various kinds, leaving the examination to be made in some
cases by the committee on farms, and in others, appointing a
special committee for this purpose.

MIDDLESEX.

Amos Hagar’s Statement.

I submit the following statement in regard to the management
of my orchards. The first orchard contains, by estimation, two
and one-half acres, has a north-westerly slope. The soil is a
deep loam, with a clayey subsoil mixed with blue gravel. This
lot contains two hundred and thirty-four apple trees, set thirty-
two feet square, with one in the centre. One hundred seventy-
four trees were set out in the spring of 1844, twenty-five in the

ORCHARDS. 419

spring of 1845, and thirty-five in the spring of 1851. The trees
when set were, most of them, one year’s growth from the bud.
Every fall I have put on some ten loads of compost manure to
the acre, and ploughed it in. I have kept it planted with corn,
potatoes, and turnips (common shovelful of manure to the hill)
with the exception of the summer of 1852.

The second orchard contains, by estimation, four acres, has a
northerly, north-easterly, and north-westerly slope. Soil is
similar to that in first orchard. This lot contains six hundred
and twenty-eight trees, one-half apple, one-half peach, set thirty-
two feet square, with one in the centre, or sixtcen feet each
way—apple and peach alternately. Four hundred and seventy-
four trees were set in the spring of 1851, and one hundred and
fifty-four in the spring of 1852. My manner of setting this lot
was merely to dip the roots of the trees in soft manure, just
before placing them in the earth. JI have manured this the
same as first lot, and kept it planted with corn, potatoes, and
turnips.

Most of the apple trees were two years’, and peach trees one
year’s growth from the bud when set. My principal variety of
apples is the Baldwin. Ihave some one hundred trees of Hub-
bardstons, and a few trees of other varieties not now remem-
bered. I have never washed my trees with any thing; trim
them in May and June.

Lincotn, Sept. 24, 1853.

William B. Harris’ Statement.

My orchard contains six acres, covered with trees of the
Baldwin variety, with five or six exceptions. They are set two
rods apart with peach trees between, in most places. In regard
to setting peach trees between apple, I think it should in no
case be done where the apple trees are less than two rods
apart, for they will certainly infringe on the growth of the
apple trees unless they are kept closely pruned. If apple
trees are far enough apart to allow the peach sufficient room,
peaches can easily be raised between them; as the peach tree
is of short duration it would usually die before any harm could
be done to the apple, if room is allowed. My plan, however,

80 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

is to set peach trees by themselves, not less than one rod apart,
and apple trees should never be set within two rods of each
other. My orchard contains two hundred and thirty-six trees,
and set in their present place in the spring of 1844.

An important object was overlooked in rearing my orchard,
until it was too late to correct the fault; this was in not shaping
the heads of the trees, in a manner that would allow ploughing,
&e., to be done among them with sufficient ease; all the fault I
notice in the appearance of my orchard is in our not having
known that by arranging the tops of trees, properly, it would
favor the future growth, and also the bearing and ripening of
the fruit. The most important fault is in not starting the lower
branches sufficiently high to allow oxen or horses ample room
to plough beneath; this fault should be corrected by all who
contemplate to raise an orchard; every one should bear in mind
that, “just as the twig is bent the tree’s inclined.” My folly
should be a caution to others.

The soil upon which my trees are planted is of many varieties,
from the rich loam to the almost unproductive knoll of rocks,
and I can see a vast difference between the trees on productive
land and those on that which is poor. I think apples can be
raised on rocky land, that will keep longer and better than
those raised on loamy soil, but the apples will in most cases be
much smaller, as will also the trees, and apples thus raised are
more liable to be of anirregular shape. I keep the trees under
a coutinued state of cultivation, raising potatoes, corn, squashes,
beans, cabbages, &c., with a large variety of root-crops; which
are raised with profit, if not in too close conjunction with the
trees. I make it a rule to prune annually in May or June, not
forgetting that too many branches taken off at once will injure
the tree; of the two months for pruning we prefer May.

I manure my crops liberally, and when dunging for crops I
usually throw a quantity about the roots of the trees. The
manure used is composed of muck and barn manure well mixed
together; I intend to keep the land as free of weeds as possi-
ble; I have never washed the trees but once, but think young
trees should be washed annually, with a composition of potash
water and manure, which will give the trees a healthy appear-
ance if it does not benefit them.

ORCHARDS. 81

I think I shall gather at least twenty barrels of apples from
the trees this present season, which will be as many as I could
expect. In regard to the treatment of insects, I remove cater-
pillars as soon as discovered; have never been troubled with
borers, and seldom with insects of any kind, except that the
present season a large number of the “ Palmer Worms ” could be
found on almost every tree; they seemed to come all at once
and to disappear in the same way; they have not as yet injured
the trees, but we think their presence another season will be
more disastrous, as we anticipate them in larger numbers. I
know of no prevention.

Nort Wosurn, Sept. 27, 1853.

Luther Adams’ Statement.

I send you a statement concerning my apple and peach
orchard that you had the goodness to examine. My land isa
sandy soil with a coarse, gravelly subsoil, full of stones, and
sloping to the west; it was pasture land planted one year with
potatoes, and one year with corn, and well manured. The
trees were set in the spring of 1847, two years from the bud,
and raised in my own nursery. The holes were dug two feet
deep, and broad enough to receive the roots without bending
them; the soil laid one side and the subsoil the other; soil
thrown into the bottom and the trees set in the soil, making no
use of the subsoil, with care not to have the trees stand too
low. It contains ninety-seven apple trees and one hundred and
six peach trees; the apple trees stand thirty feet each way,
the peach in the centre of the square; the peach covering more
ground than the apple trees. I have kept the land cultivated,
spreading on about twelve cart-loads of green manure from the
barn cellar every spring. I cultivate corn, beans, potatoes,
squashes, and ruta-bagas. I trim my apple trees every spring,
believing that it does not make much difference when you trim
after the tree has done growing in the fall until it starts in the
next spring. I do not like to wound a tree when it is growing,
for I think I have seen its bad effects. I washed my trees in
1851 and in 1853, with potash water, one pound to a pailful of
water.

TownsEnpD, Sept. 12, 1853.
¥i*

82 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

a

John B. Moore's Statement.

The orchard I offer for premium contains two hundred apple
trees, seventy-two trees set in 1850, and one hundred and twen-
ty-eight in 1851. The trees were all raised by myself, and
were one and two years from the bud when set, and nearly all
Baldwins.

The land was an old pasture, soil high, dry, and gravelly
loam, broken up at the time the trees were set, and has been
constantly cultivated with some hoed crop. Manure mostly
spread and ploughed in, and none ever applied directly to the
trees since setting.

The trees were set in holes two feet deep, two rods apart,
and manured with two shovelfuls of weak compost, composed
of manure, bone dust, ashes and peat. I have never seen any
insects except caterpillars, and those we destroyed.

Usually wash my trees with a weak solution of oil soap, but
these trees were never washed.

Trim in June, but small limbs at any time when convenient;
begin always to get a well-balanced head and a stocky tree with-
out ever tying to stakes.

Concorp, September 1, 1853.

Benjamin Wellington's Statement.

The orchard to which I wish to call your attention, consists
of one hundred and forty apple trees, one hundred and ten of
which were set in the spring of 1846, the remainder in 1849.
The soil in which they are set, is a deep yellow loam, situated
upon the eastern slope of a hill. They are set out in rows,
thirty-five feet apart each way, with peach trees between the
rows in one direction. The holes were dug about three feet
across, and eighteen inches in depth, then filled nearly level
with the surface soil, particular care being taken at the time of
setting, that the roots should not be covered more than their
original depth, and I have several times since spread from the
trees the extra soil which had accumulated about them by
the plough. The land had been ploughed and planted with
alternate crops of corn, potatoes, &c., with the exception of

ORCHARDS. 83

about one-fourth, from which I took a crop of oats, and one of
clover, thinking then, as many do now, that if a space was kept
dug around the trees, that was sufficient; but I learned, by a
very perceptible difference in the growth of the trees, that I
was mistaken, and I am now satisfied that no orchard can be
successfully grown without a thorough cultivation of the whole
eround overspread. Ihave washed my trees every spring with
a weak solution of potash, and have not been troubled at all
with borers or other worms.

Ebenezer Richardson's Ntatement.

The orchard which I offer for your inspection, is on a lot of
six acres; the soil is slate gravel. When I bought the farm,
this lot was sown with rye, and the crop was not enough to pay
the expense. I sowed it once afterwards, with the same result.
I then turned it to pasture for fourteen years, during which
time, I do not think it produced more than half enough to keep
one cow. I-came to the conclusion that it was good for
nothing but pines, which began to grow thriftily, but not liking
to have their shade on land north of them, I thought I would
try-an experiment with an orchard on it. I ploughed one-half
of it deep, and sowed buckwheat; the crop was thirteen bush-
els. I then ploughed the whole lot as deep as I could, and
sowed it with buckwheat, and to my astonishment, had the
largest growth of straw that I ever saw; the seed was not
equal to the straw, but a good crop. Ithen ploughed it as deep
as I could conveniently. I had a lot of apple trees in the
woods and pastures which came up from the seed scattered by
the cattle, and the next spring, which was 1848, I took up these
scrub trees and set them thirty feet apart each way, with a
peach tree between one way.

Not finding quite enough, of the right size, of the scrubs, I
examined a large tree with a lot of thrifty sprouts about it,
and found they came from large roots, from four to six inches
under the surface, and full of fibrous roots. I broke off sixty
of them, cut the ends smooth and filled out the lot with them;
they all lived and grew finely. In taking up and setting out,
I spent the time of three men two days in 1849. I cut them
off and grafted them about three inches under the surface; all

84 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

but about fifty of them which were not large enough. Put two
scions ina stub. In 1850, I cut out one where there were two,
and found roots on the scions fifteen inches long. We set out
two or three of them that were cut off and they lived and grew
finely. I have ploughed the lot deep, every year but one, since
the trees were set out. Three years I manured with compost
manure, three shovelfuls to a tree, the other two years, two
quarts of ashes to a tree; never have washed them with any
thing.

PEPPERELL, 1853.

H. H. Bigelow’s Statement.

T send you a statement concerning my apple orchard, which
contains one hundred and ninety-two trees, standing on four
and one-quarter acres of land. The soil is a deep, dark loam,
and was considerably rocky before the trees were set out. The
land was dug up, and ploughed, the rocks removed, and the
holes dug for the trees, in the fall of 1850, and the trees were
set out the April following. The holes were dug about twenty
inches deep, and from five to seven feet wide, and two rods
apart; the best part of the soil being laid by itself, to put
around the roots, after mixing with it about two bushels of
compost manure to each tree. Care was taken that the trees
were set at the same depth they were before being trans-
planted, and that the roots were spread and arranged in their
natural positions. The land was, the same year, and the fol-
lowing, planted with corn, and hay was put around the trees to
keep the ground moist; but I removed it in the fall, for fear of
the mice, and put, instead, compost manure, to support the
trees and keep the soil warm during winter,— spreading it
upon the land in the spring. I have washed the trees with
potash-water once —one pound of potash to a pailful of water.
I think too frequent washing not good for the trees. I have
trimmed the trees, thus far, in the months of May and June.
I never was troubled much by borers, caterpillars, ete. The
trees are mostly Baldwins, and were two years from the bud
when set out.

Manrtzoro’, September 12, 1853.

ORCHARDS. 85

James O. Freeman's Statement.

As I offer the same orchard for premium, this year that I
did last year, and as there is no change in the committee, I
have not deemed it important to give you many particulars,
rather referring you to the 55th page of the last year’s commit-
tees’ reports.

I will merely say, that the orchard contains three hundred
and six apple trees; sixty-four set in the spring of 1844; fifty
in the spring of 1845; fifty-seven in the spring of 1847; sixty
in the spring of 1848; seventy-five in the spring of 1852.

The soil in which my orchard is located, is a sandy loam,
with more or less stone, about two feet or more below the
surface.

This year, and last year, have manured my crops of corn and
potatoes in the hill only (in the orchard).

Have before used about thirty or thirty-five cartloads to the
acre, ploughing it in about four or five inches deep.

Have not been troubled with borers or other worms, but
very little. Usually wash my trees with potash-water in June.
Generally trim in May or June.

FramincHam, September 28, 1853.

Asa Clement's Ntatement.

T send you a statement concerning the orchards you saw at my
place. The land on which the pear trees are now growing, four
acres, was, five years ago, an old bushy pasture, and covered, to
some extent, with rocks, large and small, which were cleared off,
and put into double walls around the piece. There are on it
eighty rods of blind ditch, from three to four feet deep, a small
culvert through the whole, and filled with stones to within about
one foot of the surface. Many large stones were dug under
and sunk, so that a plough will run over them without interrup-
tion. Some of the soil is wet and heavy, and other portions
are dry and warm, comparatively, and contain some sand, while
the wet portions contain a large amount of gravel, and a very
small share of clay; the whole being so hard, that, after dig-
ging from eighteen to twenty-four inches deep, I was obliged to

86 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

a“

use a pick. The land was, half of it, manured with wool-waste,
at the rate of five cords to the acre, and planted with corn and
potatoes, in 1850. ,

After harvesting, the stones were cleared off, another light
dressing of manure applied, the ground ploughed, smoothed
down, and laid out for the standard trees, and at the same time
planted with nursery stock, and one hundred and eighty pear
trees were planted in. the autumn of 1850. The following
year, the remaining half was treated in the same manner. I
dug the holes for the trees about two feet deep, and from three
to four feet in breadth, and used from one and a half to two
and a half bushels of compost manure, for each tree, which had
been prepared in the following manner: four cartfuls (thirty
bushels each) of virgin soil from the woods, four of meadow mud,
three of stable manure, one of wool-waste, two of clay, thirty
bushels leached ashes, four bushels air-slacked lime, two of
plaster, one ton iron, turned from castings, mainly, and very
fine. All this was mixed together, and made a somewhat
highly-seasoned minced pie.

My share of practical knowledge of pears being within nar-
row limits, I was obliged to resort to the books for instruction,
and planted the different sorts in wet or drier portions of soil,
as they were reputed to be adapted,—Bartletts in dry, and
Van Mons Léon le Clere in wet, ete.

The varieties, bezinning on the south-west corner, are as
follows, viz.: three Madeleine, four Bloodgood, five Julienne,
six Dearborn’s Seedling, four Golden Beurré of Bilboa, four
Muscadine, seven Flemish Beauty, seven Belle Lucrative, four
Erbaniste, five Lewis, six Oswego Beurré, eight Winter Nelis,
nine Beurré d’ Aremburg, ten Vicar of Winkfield, three Pound,
or Winter Bell, eight Duchess d’ Angouleme, ten Van Buren
(of Edwards), nine Knight’s Monarch, eight Lawrence, two
Catillac, two Easter Bergamot, two Passe Colmar, three Glout
Morceau, two Easter Beurré, forty Bartletts. South-easterly
section, nine Beurré Diel, five Beurré Bose, six Andrews, seven
Heathcot, eight Seckel, nine Buffum, ten Fulton, eleven Dix,
eleven Onondaga, eleven Louise Bonne de Jersey, three Bonne
Chretien Fondante, three Van Mons Léon le Clerc, three
Napoleon, and one or two each of forty other varieties, for

ORCHARDS. 87

testing. The reason why I have planted so many varicties, is,
the cultivation of pears here, is looked upon as a visionary
scheme, and by many, talked about discouragingly ; and should
some fail to do well, I hope to find others that can be worked
upon, and prove satisfactory. The growth of the trees thus
far, has been all I desire, with very few exceptions, which will
occur among three hundred trees of any sort. Many of the
above have fruited this season, and a greater number have set
with fruit-buds for the next.

The apple orchard contains one hundred and seventy-five
trees which are planted two rods apart, and zig-zag, so as to
cover the ground more equally. The varieties are the follow-
ing, viz.: ninety Baldwins, fourteen Ladies Sweet, twelve Hub-
bardston Nonesuch, eight R. I. Greening, eight Jewett’s Fine
Red, four Danvers Winter Sweet, four Early Sweet Bough, three
Karly Harvest, three Porter, two Russet Sweet, two Northern
Spy, two Aunt Hannah, and one each of the following for the
purpose of testing: Superb Sweet, Victorious Reinette, Canada
Reinette, Cogswell, Dodge’s Sweet, Lyscom, Minister, Swaar,
Red Astrachan, Golden Ball, Yellow Bell Flower, Green New-
town Pippin, Fall Pippin, Maiden’s Blush, and others, together
with three or four seedlings with peculiar habits of growth,
which I intend shall bear fruit before they are worked. About
one-quarter of the number were set out six, and one-quarter
five, and one-quarter four, and one-quarter three years ago, and
the ground covered with nursery stock at the same time. The
trees grew rapidly, and for the last three years I have been
obliged to move much of the nursery stock, to prevent interfer-
ence with the standards, which I find grow better the less they
are obstructed by a proximity of other trees. The soil in this
orchard is similar to that I before described, except that it
nearly all lies higher, and that portion on which the peach
trees are planted with the apple, is much more dry than the
other, prepared in pretty much the same manner, except that
the stones were not so thoroughly cleared off, and compost
made of stable manure and meadow mud in equal parts was
used instead of wool-waste. Dug holes as for pears, and used
two bushels of the last named compost to each tree.

The peach trees, two hundred in number, were planted with

88 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

the apple, on the highest part of the last named orchard, and at
the same time, one rod asunder and one rod from standard
apple trees, which gives three of the former to one of the latter.
About half as much compost used in planting as with the apple.
Varieties: Coolidge Favorite, Grosse Mignonne, Early Craw-
ford, Late Crawford, Southwick Seedling, Cutter’s Rareripe,
Chelmsford Mammoth, and Boot Peach; the four last local
names, but good, nevertheless ; and Osgood’s Late Yellow, which
last matures about the same time as Late Crawford. The
growth and fruitfulness of these trees has been satisfactory.
As you had an ocular demonstration of their bearing quali-
ties, and an opportunity to test the quality in the surest manner
known by me, I will leave the subject and bide your judgment.

Dracut, Sept. 15, 1853.

HAMPSHIRE, FRANKLIN AND HAMPDEN.

Report of the Committee.

Your committee report that there were but two apple orchards
offered for premium; one by Mr. Josiah Ayers, of Amherst,
the other by Mr. Leonard Loomis, of Whately. Mr. Ayers’
orchard contains one hundred and fifty uncommonly thrifty
trees, ten years old, all raised from the seed, and budded with
the best varieties of fruit, with his own hands. He is entitled
to much credit for his good management. His orchard shows
conclusively, what can be accomplished by a judicious course
of treatment.

The orchard of Mr. Loomis contains over one hundred trees,
all very thrifty in growth, but not as straight and well-balanced
tops as those of Mr. Ayers. The committee are of the opinion
that Mr. Loomis failed in two important points in starting his
orchard; first, in not getting the best trees to set, and second,
not selecting—in all his trees—the best varieties of fruit.

Paout Larnrop, Chairman.

NovemMBeER, 30, 1853.

ORCHARDS. 89

Statement of Josiah Ayres.

I have in my orchard one hundred and fifty trees, budded on
seedling stock. They are ten years old from the seed, and
most of them have produced fruit. I have several varieties;
the principal are the Baldwin and Rock Greening; the others
are the Green Newtown Pippin, Seek-no-further, Roxbury Rus-
set, Boston Russet, Hubbardston Nonesuch, Belmont, Talman
Sweeting, Golden Sweet, Ribston Pippin, Famouse, Crimson
Pippin, and some choice seedling varieties.

Mode of cultivation from the seed to the present time :—

One year from the seed, they were taken up, the tap root
cut off, and set in rows. When large enough, they were
budded. They have been transplanted four years. They were-
set two rods distant from each other, in holes from four to six
fect in diameter, from one to two feet deep—the same depth as
in the nursery—with compost mixed with the subsoil. They
have had compost put around them in the fall, and in the spring
the earth has been dug around. One year the turf, one foot in
width, and about six feet from the tree, was removed and com-
post worked in, with good results. The trees have been
washed with weak lye, in the month of May. I have not seen
a borer on my trees. I have avoided trimming, as much as
possible, and keep the trees in proper shape. The land on
which the trees stand is sandy loam, and hard, stony and
moist subsoil. ;

Amuerst, October, 1853.

Statement of Leonard Loomis.

Below I send you a statement of the time and manner of
setting my orchard, which I offer for a premium. The orchard
contains over one hundred trees, a part of which were set in
1844, cthers in 1847, and the remainder in 1849. The holes
were six feet in diameter and about two feet deep, and filled
with compost of swamp muck and barnyard manure. The
trees were carefully set in the spring of the year, which I
consider preferable to the fall setting. I have not lost a tree.

Wuatety, November, 1853.

12*

90 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

a

HAMPSHIRE.

Report of the Committee.

The culture of fruit trees has always received the attention
of the inhabitants of Massachusetts, as a matter of high im-
portance in its relations to beauty and utility. While the soil
was new, it contained all the elements necessary for their
erowth; so that a crop of apple trees was raised with as much
certainty as a crop of wheat. But afterwards, when some of
the elements were exhausted from the soil, the orchards planted
failed in vigor of growth and in perfection of fruit. The trees
were smaller and shorter-lived, and the fruit was inferior
in size and number. Their enemies too, of the insect tribe,—
if not from increase of number, at least from diminished power
of resistance in their victims,—were more successful in their
attacks. As cider became less in demand for the table and for
the distillery, and the orchards became thinner and less pro-
ductive from the axe or from natural decay,—while the popu-
lation of the State increased,—the supply of fruit became less,
while the demand for the table or for culinary purposes became
greater.

What then shall be done to supply the increased and increas-
ing demand? The answeris: Increase the number of growing
trees; improve the modes of cultivation. As nature, in the
diminished fertility of the soil does less, art, reinforcing nature,
must do more. By studying the laws of vegetable life, by the
application of appropriate manures, in short, by proper cultiva-
tion, fertility can be communicated to the soil, vigor to the
growth of the tree, and improved flavor and increased size to
the fruit.

It is the object of the committee, in making their report, to
throw together a few brief remarks for the benefit solely of the
young and inexperienced cultivator, in the shape of rules, with-
out accompanying them with a statement of the principles on
which the rules are founded. Those who seek for the foundations
of these rules in the conclusions of science, can find them
elsewhere.

1. Plant a Nursery. Let your nursery consist chiefly of .

ORCHARDS. 91

apple trees. But let it also contain pear trees, cherry trees,
peach trees, plum trees, and grape vines. Let them all be
seedlings, obtained from good seed; unless the quince and
the grape form exceptions. Let the nursery be planted in a
deep, rich soil, and be kept in a rapidly erowing condition by
the free use of manure and the hoe. Let trees which you
remove to the orchard or the garden, be replaced by other
trees, in order to meet your future wants. Let the trees in
the nursery be so far distant from each other as to leave full
space for the roots and for the sun, and for the removal of the
trees without injury to other trees. It may be best to purchase
some trees at first, which may come into bearing sooner than
those from your own nursery. But, for the most part, in the
course of your life, depend upon your own nursery. First, be-
cause it is more economical; secondly, because it will make
you acquainted with the laws of vegetable life and with the
habitudes of trees, and thus better able to take care of them in
their advanced stages; thirdly, it will serve to interest you in
trees, by keeping them before you from their infancy up to
maturity; fourthly, it may be a source of revenue.

2. Select the ground for your orchard or fruit garden, care-
fully. It is not every soil or every exposure, that is adapted
to your purpose, though judicious cultivation may do much in
removing the disability of a poor soil and unfavorable exposure.
What is the best soil and the best exposure your observation
of the experiments of others in the vicinity, whether successful
or not, can teach you. As ageneral rule, a deep loam is better
than a stiff clay, or aloose sand. Which is the best exposure—
a north or south, an east or west—will, in different localities,
depend on the season, on the proximity of the sea or a marsh,
of a mountain or a forest. As a general rule, when you have
your choice, you had better try both sides of a hill, and one or
the other will prove preferable. It has been found, on trial,
that peach trees bear best, sometimes on the sunny side and
sometimes on the shady side of a building, according to the
season; it is safe, therefore, to try both sides, and then you
have a double chance for success. The fruit buds, swollen by
the sun and then checked by the frost, on the south side, may
be safe on the north side; or the fruits destroyed by severe

92 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

a

cold on the north side, may be safe on the south side. For
your encouragement, however, it should be remembered that
the best exposure and the best soil are not essential to suc-
cess, provided you bestow the appropriate culture.

3. Prepare your ground carefully. Fruit trees delight in
a deep soil, made mellow, in which the roots can move freely
in search of pasture. The soil should be prepared as carefully
by the plough for a crop of trees, as for a crop of wheat. If
it is your purpose to plant an orchard of apple trees, plough
your land deep, according to the nature of the soil. Apply
manure generously. Raise acrop of corn or potatoes on green
sward. The next season manure again, if necessary, and sow
the ground with oats. Just after your oats are sowed, plant
your trees in the soil thus rendered mellow and enriched by
manure, in which the roots can move freely and find nourish-
ment. ‘The oats will protect the trees against the great heat
of the sun, and the roots dying will afford them nourishment.
The soil formed of turf is appropriate to the nourishment of
the roots of the trees.

4. Plant your.trees carefully. In taking them up, see to it,
that the spade does its office by digging a circular trench around
each tree, near the end of the roots, which radiate from the
trunk or stem. Dig under the ends of the roots towards the
trunk or body, without wounding them. Raise each successive-
ly, commencing at the extremity, and the whole gently without
tearing them. Keep the roots moist until they are transferred
to their new habitation. Dig the hole so large that the roots
will not be cramped. If there is any difference between the
surface soil and that at the bottom of the hole, let the two be
kept separate. Lay the surface soil next to the roots and the
soil taken from the bottom, on the surface. Some cultivators
apply a stratum of well-rotted manure between the two kinds
of soil; but not in contact with the roots. Apply water to the
roots after the surface soil is placed on them. The time for
doing this in our country and climate is generally best in the
spring, just after the buds have begun to swell, rather than in
the autumn, though some kinds of trees succeed well when
planted in the latter season, if proper care be taken in trans-
planting them.

ORCHARDS. 93

5. Tend your trees carefully. For the first few years it is
advantageous to keep the. ground in cultivation, at least occa-
sionally. Trim judiciously, not severely, unless the grape is an
exception to the rule. The small branches can be taken off at
any time of the year. The large branches seem more readily
to harden and to be kept from decay until grown over, when
trimmed in the winter. A strong soap suds or a very weak
solution of potash applied to the body of certain trees, like the
apple and pear, is recommended for giving them a smooth bark.
Keep cattle away, but let in pigs and poultry, when it can con-
veniently be done, as it may sometimes. Our limits will not
allow us to point out the various modes of defending them from
their insect enemies. We will venture to suggest a repetition
of a series of experiments, tried by one of our number ten or
fifteen years since, which appeared to be eminently efficacious
in destroying insect life. Sulphur intimately mingled with
quicklime or with saleratus, appeared to be efficacious in de-
stroying the worm in the root of peach trees, and the grubs
and worms in garden beds. Would not these mixtures, thrown
in powder upon trees, be a preservative against insects like the
curculio, and the caterpillar, and canker-worm? The experi-
ment is worth trying. If this should not succeed, are there not
certain mineral poisons which might be proved by experiment
to be efficacious in protecting vegetable life from insects? As
the enemies to fruit increase, let your vigilance increase.

The motives for the cultivation of fruit may be found in its
relation to beauty, health, comfort, and profit. Fruit trees in
leaf, in flower, and in fruit, are eminently beautiful. Some of
them are shapely and graceful in their forms. Certain pear
trees and cherry trees are almost as regular and symmetrical
as the evergreens. Besides being ornamental, they, like other
trees, protect the house from the intense heat of summer and
the intense cold of winter, by their shade or by breaking the
force of the winds. Fruit is wholesome. Bonaparte, on a
certain occasion, cured his army of the dysentery by sending
them into the vineyards to eat ripe grapes. Moreover, the
cultivation of fruit can be made profitable, even when conducted
on a great scale. Witness the peach orchards of New Jersey
and the apple orchards of New York. Fruit trees make home

94 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

attractive, and long-remembered. They make it like Eden, of
which it is said that out of the ground made the Lord God to
grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight and good for food.
Imitate your creator, on your own grounds, and some of the
happiness of Eden shall be yours.

Wititram C. Fowier, Chairman.

AmueEnRsT, Mass.

Statement of David Rice.

An individual may often own, or come in possession of a
farm, on which stands an old orchard, that has ceased from
excessive age, neglect, and improper management, to produce
fruit, except in sparing quantities, and of the poorest quality—
unfit for eating, and hardly worth gathering. There may be no
young orchard on the place, or it may not be old enough to
produce fruit. The owner desires to be supplied with fruit,
while his young orchard is maturing, and must either purchase
fruit or recruit the.old orchard. The principle of economy is
consulted, and he finds that it will be economical to reclaim the
old orchard. And if the trees are not too aged, if they have
not lost too much of their vitality, and if they formerly bore
good, fair, palatable fruit, the chances for success are altogether
in his favor. The trouble and expense of reclaiming an old
orchard is small; and if the owner succeeds, he is repaid more
than ten times over for his labor and expenses. In addition to
this, the general appearance (and appearances go a great ways)

of his estate is improved and beautified.
About eight years ago, I came into possession of the place
on which I now live. On it was standing an old orchard, that
had almost ceased to bear, and was, as it then existed, almost
worthless. A part of the trees were beyond any hope of
eure, “tn articulo mortis,’ as the doctors say, and fit only for
firewood. The remainder, I considered to be in an improvable
condition. There was also on the premises, a number of
young grafted trees, not yet in a bearing condition. Under
the then existing state of things, I was obliged to purchase
nearly all my fruit, or go without any. The thought occurred
that I might do something to improve the productiveness of my

ORCHARDS. 95

old trees, both in quality and quantity, so as to be supplied with
fruit, while my young trees were maturing, and getting old enough
to bear well. Accordingly, in the fall of 1845, I set myself
about the task. I selected twenty-five or thirty of the most
promising trees, had them well and faithfully trimmed of all
dead, dying, unpromising, and useless limbs; being particular
to leave the most thriving and vigorous ones, that grew from
the centre of the tree. Witha hoe, I scraped off the old loose
bark and moss from the trunk and limbs, and removed the
grassy turf from around the body of the trees, for a distance
of two or three feet. I then applied from one-half to a bushel
(according to the size of tree) of unleached wood ashes around
the trunk, from whence I had removed the turf, being careful
not to have the ashes approach within four or five inches of the
bark. Over the ashes, I replaced the turf, with the grassy
side down. The following spring, I noticed that the trees put
forth new shoots in abundance, and large, luxuriant leaves of a
dark green color, and were well filled with blossoms. I
gathered, the succeeding autumn, from them and from a few
young trees, just beginning to bear, nearly two hundred bush-
els of apples. Fifty bushels of these were fit for the fruitery
or for winter use, and the others were as good as second rate
apples commonly are. I have since continued to apply the
ashes, and my trees are yet in an excellent bearing condition
for an old orchard. My young trees are now beginning to
bear a few apples. Last fall I gathered two hundred and
fifty bushels in all. Two-thirds of these were from my
old trees, and chiefly from those treated as above described.
About seventy-five bushels of these were excellent winter
apples.

I would not recommend ploughing among apple trees, espe-
cially old trees, at any time, nor under any circumstances.
They need all their roots to sustain lifeand vigor. The plough
always breaks and bruises more or less of the roots, if run
ever so shallow. Some endeavor to avoid this, by leaving a
space untouched under and around the tree, for a distance of
fifteen or twenty feet in diameter. But the evil is not avoided
in this way. The smaller roots, which are the most important,
are certain to be broken, and the trees will sustain an irrepa-

96 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

rable injury. The addition of some ferruginous substance to
the ashes, if the soil is not well supplied with iron, would do
well. A quantity of cinders from the blacksmith’s shop, such
as fly from the hot iron when beaten, (oxide of iron,) has been
suggested by Professor Nash. The soil in which my orchard
stands, is well supplied with iron, and for that reason I applied
none. The application of compost manure, to be spread under
the trees, as far as their roots extend, is also necessary on
sandy, gravelly soils, that do not contain much organic matter
or loam. A compost of equal parts of chip, barn, and hog-
yard manures, will make one of the best applications of the
kind. I would also recommend the grafting of those trees
that send up new and vigorous limbs, and which do not already
bear good varieties of fruit. I have grafted several, and they
are in a flourishing condition, although the scions are not yet
old enough to produce much.

LeEvereET?, September 27, 1853.

Statement of J. E. & A. C. Marshall.

Our peach orchard consists of eighty-five trees, and contains
thirty varieties. Nearly all of the trees bore fruit the present
season. A part of the land is a rich, gravelly soil, and the
remainder, loamy. It was ploughed and planted, two years in
succession; then sowed with oats, and seeded, previous to 1847,
when we commenced setting our trees. We have continued to
add new varieties. When we set our trees, we put three or
four shovelfuls of well rotted compost manure into each hole,
and mixed well with the soil. We have not since used manure
around the trees or upon the land; but we hoe, the first sea-
son, and keep the ground clean and free from grass, for a space
of two and a half feet in diameter. We have put some lime
and ashes mixed together, around the trees once or twice.
We have lost no trees by the borers, nor have we been troubled
with them at all. Our hens and chickens have had free access,
which we think may have been a preventive. We have culti-
vated five hundred nursery trees between the standard trees,
ona part of the land. The remainder has been mowed, and
two crops of hay taken off annually. We estimate the entire

ORCHARDS. 97

cost of setting and taking care of the trees at twenty-five dol-
lars. We have raised fruit enough in past years to pay nearly
that amount. The fruit raised the present season was not all
measured, but we estimated it at sixty bushels, worth one dol-
lar per bushel.

AmueErst, October 26, 1833.

HAMPDEN.

Report of the Committee.

The cultivation of fruit in this county is a subject of vital
importance ; one in which every individual has a direct interest.
It is not the farmer who owns his hundreds of broad and rich
acres that alone is interested; every cne who owns even a
building lot, has an abiding interest in the cultivation of fruit.
His own necessities, his convenience, his love of rural scenery,
his taste for the embellishment and improvement of his happy
home, are all concentrated in the pursuit and accomplishment
of this subject. Other equally cogent reasons are ready to
sustain our views. But argument upon this point is unnecessa-
ry. The fact is demonstrated, and it is a matter of gratulation,
that it is fully recognized by many in various sections of our
county. The increasing attention bestowed upon the subject
for a few years past, affords a cheering prospect for the future.*

But the ardent hope that the supply will soon equal the de-
mand, is a precarious one, with all its cheering appearances.
While the demand is still increasing far beyond the supply, how
long will the citizens of this county permit this state of things
to exist? How much longer will you continue to reward the
enterprise of those living in other States, to the sacrifice of
your enjoyment as well as property. This should not be so
any longer. The time has come when every individual should
not only think but act, and act with decision and energy. Every
inducement is before you to engage in this enterprise. It is a

* From the most reliable sources we are informed that not less than five thousand
dollars have been paid in Springfield for apples only, this fall; from one individual
we learn that he has paid for cherries this season, $61.50; strawberries, $135.37 ;
peaches, $309.08 ; melons, $80; pears, $2.50 per bushel, $100; chestnuts, $174 ;
walnuts, $142; apples, $500. Another house has paid for strawberries, peaches
and pears, $207.75, making a total of $1,710.62.

13*

98 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

delightful employment, full of instruction to the mind, and rich
in its rewards for the labor bestowed. The late lamented
Downing said, and few were ever better qualified to say it than
himself, that “fine fruit is the most perfect union of the useful
and beautiful, that the earth knows.” Every one who loves
his home or his country, is in duty bourd to supply his own de-
mands, and thus add his proportion of the useful and beautiful,
both to his home and his country.

The directors have been called upon to examine the orchards
of five applicants: three of apples and two of pears. An
opportunity has been thus offered, for a more extended ob-
servation of the attention which the subject has already
aroused in the minds of many who have too long deferred their
action; we noticed, with great satisfaction, the recent trans-
planting of many orchards, which, from their healthy growth and
general appearance of skilful management, gave every indica-
tion of a sure remuneration for the labor bestowed. In pass-
ing upon those more immediately under our cognizance, we
mean no disparagement to any one when we mention more par-
ticularly the one of Mrs. Richard Bagg, Jr. Mr. Bagg was the
pioneer in the enterprise of supplying the growing markets in
this vicinity with garden vegetables; in this, his uncompro-
mising energy and success went hand in hand; having syste-
matized this branch of his business, his active mind embraced
a wider range, and his products found a ready market in our
large cities. The cultivation of fruit seemed to him an appro-
priate branch of his business. To think and act, were with
him synonymous; with these views he purchased a tract of
land, with no higher recommendation for such purpose, than the
minimum price at which it was offered; it was here Mr. Bagg
commenced, in the spring of 1851, his operations, by setting four
hundred trees; the exact position in which they stand to each
other from any position of view, is characteristic of the man in
all his dealings; his labors here were short; scarcely had he
arranged these materials for his monument, before he was sum-
moned to have his name written—with the dead; his epitaph
upon this monument should be written, useful and beautiful.
The remaining orchards descrve the attention of all who are
about commencing an orchard, and would avail themselves of

ORCHARDS. 99

the judgment and experience of others; in awarding the pre-
miums, the directors have not been governed solely by the
rapid growth of wood and branch, but have considered the
facilities for promoting the growth and the position of the
trees.

DanieL REYNOLDS, Chairman.

Mrs. R. Bagg’s Siatement.

This orchard is situated on the farm of the late Richard
Bagg, Jr.,in West Springfield, and consists of four hundred
trees. They were set in the month of April, 1851, in rows two
rods apart each way; when set, holes were dug about two feet
square and two feet deep, and filled with rich meadow loam, in
which the trees were placed. The land has been cultivated
with hoed crops, and received a good dressing of manure and

ashes every spring.

Ocran Dickinson’s Statement.

The orchard which I offer for the examination of the direct
ers, is in the immediate vicinity of my dwelling-house ; the soil,
a rich alluvial loam, admirably adapted to the cultivation of
fruit; with this view, I transplanted, in the fall ef 1848 and
spring of 1849, what I considered a judicious selection from
several nurseries, of the most approved varieties of apples and
pears, as per catalogue annexed. The mode ef cultivation
which has thus far been pursued with them, has been, chiefly to
promote a healthy action of the sap, and thereby to cause a
rapid growth of wood; to produce these resuits I have usually,
in the month of November, given them a full dressing of ma-
nure, fine and well prepared, as a top-dressing; and in the
spring this is dug in and thoroughly mixed with the soil; in
June they are washed, trunk and limbs, as high as practicable,
with a solution of whale oil soap, prepared with one and a half
pounds of the soap to a pailful of soft water. This prepara-
tion protects the tree from insects, and keeps the bark of the
trees in a healthy state. During the sammer the ground around
them is kept clean from weeds and grass, by the use of the hoe.
In pruning, | prefer the spring season, and the knife rather than.
the saw; amputation of limbs should be prevented by the

100 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

early application of the knife. The following varieties consti-
tute the selection above referred to, viz. :—

Baldwin, twenty; Northern Spy, six; R. I. Greening, six;
Golden Sweet, four; Roxbury Russet, four; Winter Pearmain,
four; Pome Royal, three; Congress, three; Porter, three;
Hubbardston Nonesuch, three; Newtown Pippin, three; Early
Sweet Bough, two; Early Harvest, two; Orange Pippin, two;
Fall Pippin, two; Summer Pearmain, two; Maiden Blush, two;
Sour Bough, two; Yellow Gillyflower, two; Moore’s Sweeting,
two; Late Golden Sweet, four; Wine Apple, one; Pennock’s
Winter Red, one; Blue Pearmain, one. Total, eighty-four.

My collection of pear trees, contains the following varieties,
viz.: Bartlett, six; Flemish Beauty, five; Duchess D’Angou-
leme, four; Virgalieu, three; Jargonnelle, three; Seckel, four ;
Louise Bon de Jersey, four; Beurré Diel, two ; Bloodgood, one;
Glout Morceau, one; Vicar of Winkfield, one; Passe Colmar,
one. Total, thirty-five.

In the cultivation of the pear, I pursue the same method as
with the apple, with this important exception, a mixture of iron
filings should be incorporated with the manure used in the pear
orchard. I would caution all against the use of long or straw
manure around their trees in the fall, or in any manner proyid-
ing material for the winter quarters of mice.

West SprinGcrieLp.

Sardis Gillett's Statement.

The apple orchard which I effer for premium, consists of one
hundred and one trees, viz.: fifty Baldwins, twenty-one Rhode
Island Greenings, fourteen Roxbury Russets, seven Newtown
Pippins, seven Fall Boughs, and the remainder assorted kinds,
which were set out in the spring of 1849. The land is on the
top of a hill, the highest land on my farm, and consists of a red
eravel; the land was new, and had a crop of rye on it the year
previous to the planting of the orchard; it has been cultivated
with corn and potatoes every year except the past. I have
cleared up my wood-yard every fall, and put the chip manure
around the trees, which is all the manure it has had except in

ORCHARDS. 101

the spring of 1851, when I planted it with potatoes; I then
spread a little fine°compost around the trees.

SouTrHWICK.

D. Chauncey Brewer's Statement.

At your request, I have sent you the number of pear trees
which I wish to enter for premium. It is twenty-six; one-half
are standards, the remainder, dwarfs. They are of the follow-
ing varieties: Bartlett, Beurré d’Amalis, Beurré Diel, Beurré
d’Aremburg, Louise Bon de Jersey, Flemish Beauty, White
Doyenne, Frederick of Wurtemburg, Henry IV. and Madeleine.

The soil on which they stand, is a sandy loam; it has been
cultivated for three years, and was in a good state for trans-
planting. Part of them were set in the spring of 1852, the
remainder in the fall. The standards are set twenty feet
apart; between these are set the dwarfs, which brings them ten
feet from each other. Many persons would suppose this too
near. But the pear requires less space than other trees.
Many individuals set them only eight feet apart; but 1 think
this too close. I keep my trees well headed in, and give them
plenty of mulching; some of them have made three feet
growth this season. Success depends, in a great measure,
upon judicious pruning, and proper mulching. I have recently
picked from one tree, two Flemish Beauty pears, that weighed
three-quarters of a pound each; the same tree has had quite
a number taken from it that would weigh nearly the same.

SPRINGFIELD.

FRANKLIN.

Report of the Committee. :

There were entered, for premium, six young apple orchards.

The committee visited them in September, 1852, and in Sep-
tember, 1853.

The season has been an unfavorable one for apple trees.
The drought has been severe, and the worms stripped the
trees of leaves in June, and materially retarded their growth.
Some of the orchards visited have done very well, and have

102 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

amply repaid all the care and labor which have been expended
upon them. The committee are rejoiced at the increased
interest which has been awakened, within a few years, among
our farmers in their orchards. Young and thrifty trees are
appearing on every side, and the old native cider apples
are giving place to choice eatable and marketable fruit. The
people of Franklin County are just becoming conscious of what
they can do in raising good fruit. We have been and are still
behind most other counties of the State, but the increased
facilities for reaching market have turned the attention of many
in this direction. It is to be hoped that the good work will
be carried on, and that many of our hill sides will, ere long,
be covered with fruitful orchards. We think that our farmers
have no occasion to fear that the market for geod winter
apples will be overstocked. The demand is yearly increasing,
and we, in Franklin County, are not able, and shall not be for
years, to supply the wants of our own neighborhood. Fruit is
becoming a more impertant article of food, and is destined to
occupy 2 far higher place than it now holds, in the supply of
the table. The time is not far distant when, m every “well
regulated family,” a bed of strawberries and raspberries will
be thought as indispensable as a bed of beets and cabbages
now is, and when a dezen barrels ef winter apples will be
regarded as only a moderate supply fer a family. The day for
dried apples has passed. We want, and we can have, fair
fresh apples till June, when strawberries come to take their
place.

There are few departments of agriculture which are better
ealculated to awaken a generous enthusiasm, and a sincere love
and respect for the oceupation, than the cultivation of fruit
trees. It taxes the best powers of a man’s mind; it brings
him into near and pleasant contact with many of the most
beautiful operations of nature. A thrifty orchard whieh aman
has set with his own hands, whose growth he has watched for
years, which he has defended summer and winter, will be to
him a source of exquisite pleasure; it will bind him more
closely to the spot which he calls by the sacred name of home.
The moral influences which attend the cultivation of fruit trees,
and the free use of fruit as an article of food, we conceive to

ORCHARDS. 103

be both great and good. Asa source of pecuniary profit, we
are persuaded that the labor of the farmer in this county can-
not be turned to better account than by the cultivation of fruit;
only he must be content “to labor and to wait.” Something
more will be required than to set out his trees; they need cul-
tivation as much as the field of corn. Kvery month of the
year they need something to be done, and which cannot be
neglected. Labor and care are the conditions of success here
as well as every where else.

We do not propose to write an essay upon the raising of
fruit trees, but a few thougl*ts have been suggested by our
visits to the orchards of the county, which we beg leave to
offer. We think more pains should have been taken than has
usually been the case, in the selection of the young trees from
the nursery. A tree can be forced into proper shape after it
is transplanted into the orchard; but it is far better that it
should grow into proper shape in the nursery. It is the busi-
ness of the tree raiser to furnish you with a straight, healthy,
well-balanced, well-rooted tree, a model, on a small scale, of
what you want ina full grown tree. If he has not done this,
he has not done his work well. Why should you patronize
him more than any other bungler, and oblige yourself to do his
work over for him? There are trees to be had whose branches
are neither too many nor too few; they are the right height
from the ground, and are regularly distributed about the trunk.
Such trees are the most profitable to set out. Too much pains
cannot be taken to have a straight trunk and a well-balanced
top. The former can be obtained either by tying it to a stake
driven into the ground, or by a stake lashed to the body of
the tree. The latter can be secured by judicious pruning, or,
in some cases, by cutting off the ends of the growing shoots
on the heaviest side, and thus throwing the growth on to the
weaker side. A tree which divides into two branches near the
ground, can be made a useful tree only by cutting off one
branch, even if it takes half of the tree; the other half is better
than the whole would be. If the tree is not well shaped, the
fault is in the orchardist; he has no one to blame but his own
want of care or skill.

We have noticed, with regret, that some of the gentlemen

104 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

who have presented their orchards for inspection, have allowed
their ground to remain in grass. If young orchards are of
trifling or secondary consideration, this will do; but if one
would have a good orchard, one worthy to be commended, it is
indispensable that the ground be kept loose by cultivation. A
crop of corn or potatoes may be taken advantageously from
the orchard if care is taken in ploughing not to break the roots
of the trees, and in hoeing to keep the ground round the
trees clear of weeds and grass.

Mulching young trees is not sufficiently attended to. It is
the only way in which young trees, or trees recently trans-
planted, can be preserved from a drought. .Watering the sur-
face does not do it. Ifthe trees are well mulched they do not
need watering. :

We would urge all who can, to set out and cultivate fruit
trees. Have an orchard, if circumstances will admit; if not,
use up the odd corners of the garden, or the side hill, which is
now suffered to run to waste. Do it for the sake of adorning
your home and making it attractive and beautiful. Do it as a
source of profit, and as a means of providing for your family
wholesome and agreeable food.

Mr. Stebbins’ orchard is not very large. He has no more
trees than he can well take care of. His trees have grown
well this year. We commend to the society the means which
he has taken to free his trees of the worms, whose ravages
have been so destructive to the fruit this year. We have heard
of others who have used the same means with success. His
orchard is well sheltered from the wind, and is upon land,
which, owing to its position, would not be worth a fourth part
as much as the land upon which all the other orchards to which
a premium has been awarded, is worth.

Mr. Loomis’ orchard gave the committee much satisfaction.
He has a fine lot of trees. One row, in particular, which was
set by the side of a tight board fence, and where a row of
maple trees once stood, have grown with unusual rapidity.
Query. Was it the decaying leaves of the maple which fur-
nished the right nutriment to those trees ?

Mr. Clapp had taken great pains with his trees. The bark

ORCHARDS. 105

was clean and healthy, the trunks were straight, the tops well
proportioned. Had his ground been ploughed and cultivated,
we should have probably awarded him the first premium.

Joun F. Moors, Chairman.

HOUSATONIC.

From the Report of the Committee.

Of the capability of Berkshire to produce fruits of almost
every kind, and in great perfection, we have for years been
satisfied. We often hear the remark, “we cannot raise peaches
in this climate, it is too cold;” and yet we have seen, during
the present autumn, full evidence of the folly of this idea, in
almost every town in the county. From Adams to Sheffield,
the trees are loaded with the choicest varieties. The late,
hard kinds, which nothing but a snow-storm could soften, and
which, we were once assured by an owner, were raised éx-
pressly for the wool, seem to have disappeared, and it is found
that the Melocoton, Crawford’s Early and Late, Morris Whites,
Stockton’s Seedling, and other choice varieties, can be raised th
the greatest perfection.

The pear is also fast becoming a standard fruit. The doe-
trine, that the tree must be left to a slow and stinted growth,
to insure its life, is exploded. The superb pears, so large and
fine as almost to deny their parentage and name, are produced
by high culture, deep digging, and heavy manuring. This, we
were assured by more than one very successful culturist at the
heart of our Commonwealth, only the last week, was the secret
of success; and by it, some foreign varieties which are in high
repute at home, but had been called almost worthless in this
country, have recently been brought out in all their ancient

glory.

14%

106 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

a

NORFOLK.

Report of the Committee.

According to the old Hebrew story, man was placed in a
garden to till and to keep it, and man will never be contented
and happy till he gets back into a garden again. The tales of
the gardens of Alcinéus and the Hesperides, prove to us that,
even in ancient times, men connected the golden age with
golden apples, and put Paradise always in gardens. And, with
the coming of the future Paradise, and the bright millennium
‘of human hopes and aspirations, there is always associated the
thought of the whole earth as one great garden of beauty and
“delight,” (the translation of the word “Viden,”) abounding
everywhere with luscious fruitage, and wreathed with sweetest
flowers. This hope is the ultimatum of all outward culture —
the crowning point of all outward earthly bliss. Even the
ancient prophet places his joyfully-anticipated millennium in a
garden, when he predicts that “the wilderness and solitary
plain shall be glad, (or fruitful,) and the desert shall rejoice
and blossom as the rose.”

In the progress of that civilization which is to beautify,

perfect, and bless the earth, first comes the wilderness, with
hunting and fishing, and an immethodical, careless, half-savage
cultivation of the soil; next, the farm, with its careful system
and abundant products; and lastly, and finally, the garden,
with its various and delicious fruits, —fit food for the immor-
tals. And, if the civilization of our own land and the world
at large is to be judged by its gardens, or even by its syste-
matic and well-tilled farms, we can hardly yet be regarded as
having emerged from the original wilderness.
_ Every friend of culture cannot but earnestly feel that the
end and aim of all outward civilization, is to bring back to
man the ancient Paradise; and a desire to feed again on the
fruits that nourished his joyful days of primeval happiness,
gives him no peace, till, lo! again the vines and the orchards
gladden the hill-sides, and the trees, bending down with their
golden perfumed bounty, win him back to the bliss of Eden,
that scemed once to have forsaken the world forever!

ORCHARDS. 107

- The table of refined civilization is not a table of the hunting-
ground, the wilderness, or even of the farm only —but of the
garden. Think, for a moment, of the ancient Adam—the
primitive man of Chaldee story—his hands dripping with
gore, slaying and dressing a fattened ox, or an overgrown
swine, while the lovely Eve, with smirched and greasy fingers,
is peppering the roasting spare-rib on the Paradisial hearth.
How much more delicate, refined, and beautiful!—how much
more inviting and seductive !—a table covered with melting
and delicious strawberries, with gushing raspberries, sending
forth their delicate aroma, and fair bunches of the ruby cherry ;
or crowned with delicious, downy peaches, luscious, golden
pears, or glowing apples, with their shixing, waxen surface, and
transparent clusters of rich, luxurious grapes, with their “ pur-
ple light,” not to speak of the various spring melons, and
countless lesser fruits!

I am aware that, in a report of a society, distinguished by
having Marshall P. Wilder for its president, and including
among its members, men like B. V. French, Samuel Walker,
Hi. M. Richards, Samuel Downer, Jr., etc., all hardly less ac-
complished and famous in the annals of American fruit culture,
it may seem superfluous, as well as presumptive, to urge any
reasons for the more extensive cultivation of fruit in our
county. And yet, no true friend of culture and his race can
ever rest content, while the blessings that result from such
culture are restricted to the refined or wealthy few among us;
or be willing to cease his efforts in the divine and glorious:
cause, till, from a costly luxury, fruit comes to be a cheap and
universal comfort—one of the very necessities of life. Aye!
he would labor by word and by deed,—by the dissemination
of sound information, and through the influence of example,
till the poor man’s table shall be loaded with these luscious
productions, and the child of the humblest citizen shall be
blessed by their abundance.

The arguments in favor of universal fruit culture are so
various, as well as so powerful, that we can allude to only a
few of them here. And we fear, that, with all efforts,—so
rapid is the increase of the non-producing consumer over the
producer, — that it will be long, very long, ere the market price

L08 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

of fruits will be such as not most fully to remunerate the wise
cultivator.

And first. People of all ages and conditions of life enjoy:
the delightful refreshment that the juices of fruits bestow, even,
those who, not being cultivators themselves, vainly pretend to
care little for such things. Such men will eat their neighbors’
fruits fast enough, and, when they enter your house or grounds,
do not heed their professions or their pretence of a distaste
for fruits. Do not imagine that you will save your reputation,
and pears and apples too, by offering to them such dainties.

Second. The fondness for the various unwholesome imita-
tions of fruits, such as cakes, custards, pastries, and confection-
ery, not only indicates a love for the real article, but the dis-
placement of these vile and noxious compounds would doubtless
have a most beneficial effect upon the health of our people; for
there is no diet so salutary, so refreshing, and delightful, both
to the young and the old, as ripe fresh fruits. Indeed, there
are not a few diseases, for which fruits are the best remedy.
Those whose breakfast, or first food in the morning, is of fresh,
fruits, seldom or never suffer from dyspepsia, constipation, in-
flammation, or bilious complaints of any kind. The acid of fruits,
isa, panacea for scurvy and eruptive disorders. Ripe peaches,
are found to be a specific in summer complaints; and the juices,
of all fruits tend to drive humors to the surface, and to purify.
the blood; and whole families, with scrofulous tendencies, have,
been saved and restored to blooming and elastic health, by:
returning back to the simple fruit diet of nature. In these,
respects, fruit is the antipodes of the mineral potash poison,
that, in the form of saleratus and soda, is destroying the teeth,
stomach, and tissues of those of our countrymen who use such
an uncivilized dict. The principal element of the bile is a
sodaic alkali, and the natural acids of fruits stimulate the
secretions of the gastric juice, and, by uniting with the alkaline,
secretions of the liver, purge the stomach and bowels of any,
excess of bile, cleanse and purify the whole system, and render
all its secretions and motions natural and healthful. Carry the
puny children of our towns and cities, who have been brought
up. on a miserable regimen, principally of meats, cakes, and
teas, into the free, open country, to feed on berries and fruits,

ORCHARDS. 109

and they soon pick up and grow plump, rosy, and hearty. Ol
how the meagre, wizened, pale-faced little ones of the street,
leap with joy at the sight of the glowing peaches and shining
apples, bottling up, in their beautiful perfumed skins, more po-
tent medicines than any apothecary’s shop can boast, as curative,
as they are grateful.

Third. Doubtless dram-drinking and intemperance itself
would be infinitely lessened, if not utterly banished from our
soil, by an abundance of fruits; for the love of wines, cordials,
ardent spirits, and liquors, is but a corruption of the true and
natural taste for the juices of fruits; and it has been often
noticed, that those addicted to the excessive use of such drinks
are extremely fond of fruits by nature; and only give such an
abundance of fresh wholesome fruit, and they will soon banish
their wines and liquors, and various poisonous spirituous mix-
tures.

Fourth. Again, the philosophy of specifics, which is but just,
in its infancy, even in its application to the vegetable world, will,
ere long, be seen to be equally applicable to the animal organiza-
tion; and it will be found that, while potatoes, cabbage, &c.,
tend to muscular development, as instanced in the Irish and in
the Dutch, the hull of corn and grain contributes to the bones,
and their flour to the substance of the brain—fruits feed the.
nervous tissues and the spiritual body, and produce a mental
elevation and harmony, and an exhilaration of spirits, that give
a perpetual serenity, peace, and joy.

Such are some among the many reasons, besides the continu-
ally increasing pecuniary compensation to the intelligent culti-
vator, why we would urge the universal culture of the various,
garden fruits in their succession, till our fruit rooms shall be as,
common as cellar or pantry; our drawers of grapes and pears for
winter use, shall be more universal even than our good stores
of apples now; and the time come when the poorest and
humblest man, from his little plat of ground, may nourish and
delight his little ones, the year round, with the luxury of suc-
cessive fruits, grown to be a necessary comfort.

And to this end it might be well for agricultural and horti-
cultural associations, not only to distribute in their counties
and towns the best seeds, the finest and most profitable scions,

110 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

plants and trees, grown to that end; but—what is of equal, if
not greater importance—to disseminate, by publications and
by lectures before lyceums and agricultural clubs, a knowledge
of the correct principles of fruit culture—a subject concerning
which, we can only drop a few hints, in conclusion. .
In the first place, it must be borne in mind that, as in all
culture, so most especially in fruit culture, is deep tillage the
sine qua non; that trenching, subsoiling, and double spading
are absolutely essential to enable the roots to run down into &
mellow, rich soil, and thus produce an abundance of fair, large,
and luscious fruitage. A neighbor of ours feared that he
should lose a favorite pear tree, because one of his workmen
dug a great trench by its side, in which to bury his cabbages
for the winter. In place of receiving any injury, however, the
tree was stimulated to a new growth, and a most prolific pro-
duction of fruit of uncommon size and flavor, and the next
year, of course, saw our friend trenching for pears himself.
In setting out an apple orchard, or a few pear trees, there are
many who will but just hoe a hole in the ground large enough
to bury a cat in, pop the roots into it, and, as the trees dry up
and die, have the impudence to say, “O! we never had any luck
with trees.” We always give thanks when any of our friends, who
have the folly and the cruelty to deal thus with their trees, lose
them, for they ought to die, and it is only a just retribution.
Secondly. The proper enriching of the soil, thus deeply
tilled, is of hard.y less importance. A tree can no more grow
without its appropriate food than a man can; and it is the
salts of earths and manures, dissolved in water, that feed the
roots of trees. There are those who plant out their trees in
impoverished soil, or mere sand or gravel, without giving them
a jot of other nourishment, as though they could live and grow
without any rich, good soil, any more than oats or wheat can.
No man of common sense, one would think, could expect to
grow good, fine, juicy apples out of mere gravel-stones. There
are others, who set out orchards in a green sward, and this, we
think, is the most common of all blunders in orcharding. They
thus allow the sod to grow tight up about their very stems, —
they never come to have trunks,—and then complain “ that
the soil in their part of the country isn’t at all suited to fruit

ORCHARDS. Lid

trees.” Why? What would they think of a man who should
plant a corn-field in the grass? How much of the sun, and air,
and rain; how much nutriment from the earth, that is acted on
and fertilized by the sun, and air, and rain, would the roots of
the corn or the trees get?
Thirdly. The trees must not only be fed, but every tree must
have its appropriate nourishment. Here the law of specifics,
which is just beginning to receive the attention of scientific
cultivators, comes in play. Thus it is found that one kind of
nourishment conduces to the growth of foliage and wood,
another tends to fruit; and, while one peculiar plant or tree
‘requires one peculiar element for its sustenance, another de-
‘mands a far different element. For example: lime is a great
absorbent of acids, and thus materially assists in the elabora-
tion of the juices of fruits; this is particularly observable in
the apple tree, the bark of which is half made up of the lime,
which it has thus thrown out of its circulation as useless, after
it has employed it in its vegetable economy. To all trees,
doubtless, a vegetable substratum of soil is necessary, composed
of decayed wood, leaves,—like pond mud, peat earth, heath
moulds,—but with this alone, without ammonia, or the sulphates
and phosphates, or lime, to absorb and retain these, the fruit
may be large and perhaps fine, but it will often be rough,
coarse, and astringent on the one hand, or flat and tasteless on
the other. A pear or apple, in cold clay soil, for example, is
found to be a very different thing from what it is in a warm,
loam, or sandy land. And, although the science of specifics is
now in its infancy, and it may be difficult for some accomplished
cultivators even to decide in regard to the best soil and culture
for various and different plants and trees, yet it will, we think,
_be safe to say—Ist. That wood ashes, containing, as they do,
all the elements necessary to their growth, save carbon, that is
supplied by the air, is a specific for all trees and woods. 2d.
That lime, whether in the form of marl, shell, plaster, or stone
lime, is a specific for apple trees; and that apples are fairest
and largest grown inacalcareous soil. 3d. That phosphates, in
. the form of bones, (which are principally made up of phosphate
of lime,) mineral, or rock phosphate of lime, or prepared super-
- phosphate, are specifics for pears and grapes. 4th. That

112 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

“ A

ammoniacal manures, as guano, horse dung, and urine, are spe-
cifics for the peach, and give flavor and spirit to all other fruits.

Care should be taken to avoid the common fault of setting
trees too deep, so that, to live and flourish, they are compelled
to form new roots above the old.

Proper pruning is another important consideration in this
connection. All trees should be shaped when they are young,
So as to avoid the injury and unsightliness of mutilating large
limbs when they are grown. Dwarfs, like hedges, should be
pruned pyramidically, so that the lower limbs may not die out,
and the sun, air, and rain may have access equally to the under
as the upper branches. Peach trees, especially, need to have
a large part of the spring growth cut in June, and a second
pruning in August; this double pruning will throw the sap into
fruit buds, make the tree stout and strong, and able, even
when loaded to resist the winds; and, in place of a few ctiola-
ted and drawn out branches, will cause a thick growth, that
will carry the fruit buds back near to the trunk; and the short,
well ripened wood will withstand the winter frosts better, as
well.as the summer tempests. In this way, and by keeping a
little heap of coal ashes round the butt, to keep out the borers,
acrop of fruit will be always sure. Grapes and peaches, to
produce fruit instead of leaves and wood, need constant and
thorough pruning.

A mere allusion to the subject of mulching will conclude
these hints. Though a matter that has received too little
general consideration, yet, years ago, attention was called by
the writer and others, in horticultural and agricultural periodi-
cals, to the importance of mulching trees, shrubs, plants, &e.
In other words, of covering the surface of the soil, around
their roots, with light porous substances, as hay, leaves, straw,
chips, shavings, sawdust, and even shells. The vast benefit of
this operation will instantly be seen, when we reflect that the
food of plants is always liquid; that their nutriment is sucked
up by the mouths of the little spongioles at the end of the
radicles or little roots, in the form of water that has absorbed
the nutritious elements of the soil; and that when—as igs apt
to be the case in our periodical New England droughts—the
ground becomes parched, the trees not merely become dry, but

ORCHARDS. 113

are absolutely starved; and thus mulching, by preventing the
evaporation of the moisture in which the food of plants is held
in solution, keeps them always well fed, prevents the fruit from
being checked in its growth, and so becoming stinted and knurly
in its appearance, or falling prematurely; and, by affording a
constant flow of sap, gives the rejoicing cultivator an abundance
of fair, large, and juicy fruit from stalk, and herb, and vine
tree.
JAMES RICHARDSON, JR., Chairman.

BARNSTABLE.

In former years, every farmer had his orchard, and apples
were abundant. Of late, the crop of apples has been uncer-
tain. The canker-worm has ruined hundreds of orchards, and
in many “that which the canker-worm hath left, hath the palmer-
worm eaten.” The pear was seldom cultivated. Our fathers
thought that it required a growth of fifty years for a tree to
come into bearing; that the grandfather must plant, and the
grandchild partake of the fruit; now, the pear produces in two
years after the young tree is grafted, and is the easiest of all
fruits to cultivate. By the skill and science of modern horti-
culturists, new and delicious varieties have been produced, and
every man who owns a rood of ground, may have pears at all
seasons of the year. '

Soil_—The best soil for the pear is a strong loam, on a dry
subsoil; it will, however, adapt itself to as great a variety of
soils as any fruit tree. Wet soils are unfit, and sandy should
be improved by a top-dressing of clay or heavy muck.

Exposure.—A_ south-west exposure is the worst in this
climate. The strong, dry, south-west winds which prevail in
the early part of the season, blast the tender leaves of the
pear. They wither and turn black, and the tender shoots on
the windward side shrivel and blast. Every old pear tree in
the county leans towards the north-east, showing that a south-
west exposure has always been more injurious than an easterly.

The pear, when engrafted on the quince, becomes dwarf in
its habits, bears early, but is not long-lived. Dwarf trees may

15*

114 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

a

be set within eight feet of each other. For standard trees,
thirty feet is the distance usually recommended.

There are other kinds equally as good as the following selec-
tion; but we recommend these because they have been set by
many in this county, and with few exceptions, have proved to
be hardy and productive.

Dearborn’s Seedling, early, native fruit; Bartlett, Septem-
ber, foreign fruit; Cushing, September, native fruit; Buffum,
September, native fruit; Louise Bonne de Jersey, September,
foreign fruit; Seckel, October, native fruit; Lewis, November
to December, native fruit; Vicar of Winkfield, November to
December, foreign fruit; Glout Morceau, November to Decem-
ber, foreign fruit; Prince’s St. Germain, November to March,
native fruit.

No entry was made for the society’s premiums on fruit and
forest trees. On the day of the annual cattle show and fair,
the Rev. Mr. Pratt, of Brewster, handed the committee a descrip-
tion of the garden of Mr. Sidney Underwood, of Harwich.
Since, the committee have received specimens of fruit from Mr.
Underwood, and have examined his grounds.

Mr. Underwood’s garden contains one acre. Nine years ago
this land had for many years remained an uncultivated waste.
Its fertility had been exhausted by repeated crops of corn and
rye, and it was thrown out to commons as worthless. Mr.
Underwood bought it for a trifle, put up buildings thereon, and
commenced manuring and cultivating it. He seta variety of
choice fruit, shade trees, vines, and shrubbery. Many of his
trees are now in full bearing. Last year, after supplying the
wants of his family and boarders in his house, he sold seventy-
five dollars worth of fruit and vegetables from this acre of
poor land.

Mr. Underwood is a mechanic, and most of the labor in his
garden has been done as a recreation—at the intervals of
business, in those odd moments which too many are inclined to
spend in idleness at the shops and other resorts for loungers.
He does his work scientifically; understands the art of graft-
ing and budding; of pruning and heading in trees to prevent
too much growth of wood and to increase the size and flavor
of the fruit. He has about sixty orange quince trees, most of

FOREST TREES. 115

them in full bearing, and fifteen peach trees which were loaded
the present year with fruit of superior varicties, suited to this
climate. He has plum, pear, and cherry trees, in bearing, and
currents, gooseberries, and strawberries in abundance. The
Isabella grape in his garden, ripens well; the clusters are large
and free from blight. He has a small nursery of peach, cherry,
pear, and quince trees.

The committee take pleasure in furnishing these details—that
show what a man may do if he have the taste and inclination—
show that there is no man who can say that he never had time
to set a tree by his house or the road side. Trees and shrub-
bery increase the comfort, convenience, and income of those
who plant them; they make a village pleasant, and add to the
permanent wealth of the community. He that builds a ship,
adds nothing to the substantial wealth of society; she may be
lost on her first voyage, or in a few years use and decay will
make her worthless; but he that improves the soil, creates
wealth that will endure for generations. :

Amos Otts, Chairman.

FOREST TREES.

By a law of the Commonwealth, it is made a condition of
receiving the State bounty, that the societies “shall offer,
annually, such premiums and encouragement for the raising and
preserving of oaks and other forest trees, as to them shall
seem proper and best adapted to perpetuate within the State,
an adequate supply of ship timber.”

Most of the societies have complied with this law, as in duty
bound, yet but few applications for premiums have ever been
made. Theattention of farmers in some sections of the State,
has, however, been turned to the subject, and it has been found
profitable to plant many of the light and worn out lands of
Barnstable, Bristol, and Plymouth, to the pitch pine. The fol-
- lowing are the only reports made on this subject.

116 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

ESSEX.

Report of the Committee.

The committee appointed in 1848, upon the offer made by
Richard 8. Fay, Esq., of Lynn, for the cultivation of oaks from
the acorn, have attended to the duty assigned them, and re-
port :-—

That on the 25th of September, 1847, a letter was received
from Mr. Fay, through B. T. Reed, Esq., “ proposing a prize of
one hundred dollars for the best plantation of oaks, of not less
than one acre. The prevailing species to consist of the white
and the black, or the yellow oaks, to be grown from the acorn,
planted this autumn or in the spring, on land not now under
tillage, or in mowing. The prize to be awarded in 1852, and
the money, in the meantime, to be placed at interest for the
benefit of the successful competitor.” In connection with this
offer, Mr. Fay remarks: “It will require no great expenditure
of time, and no money, to enable any person to plant an acre,
and the advantage to the person so doing, would far exceed the
labor bestowed, even if an unsuccessful competitor.” He de-
clines giving any specific instructions as to the planting, think-
ing “it will be best for every one to follow out their own ideas
upon the subject.”

Such was the offer, and such were the conditions on which
the money was entrusted to the trustees of this society, and
deposited with the treasurer.

On the 23d of June, 1848, notice was given to the secretary,
by Dr. Andrew Nichols, of Danvers, that he had a plantation
of oaks, situate “on the north-western brow of Nichols’ Hill,
in Middleton, made about the middle of May, from acorns
gathered the last autumn, which had come up well, and the
plants were then from one to six inches in height.

This plantation was entered by him for the premium offered
by Mr. Fay.

Another entry was made by Mr. Wetherbee, for a plantation
made about the same time, on the farm of Mr. Fay, in Lynn.

The committee visited both of these plantations, in the

FOREST TREES. 11T

autumn following, and found them in vigorous and healthy con-
dition; plants sufficiently numerous, varying from three to
twelve inches in height.

On the 8th of August, 1850, the following observations were
made by the committee, upon Dr. Nichols’ plantation. “Field
rude, rough, and briery. Plants varying from one to four feet
in height. The English oaks are much ahead of the American,
averaging twice the height. The trees stand in hills about five
feet apart, numbering about three thousand on the lot. Early
in the season, the earth was stirred about the trees, and vacant
spaces were supplied by transplanting from hills that contained
more than one; many of those thus moved have failed to grow.
Between the hills, nature has had full possession, and black-
berry and other vines abound, with here and there a bunch of
birches ora stray poplar. Some of the English oaks have
started ahead at least two feet, the present season.”

On the Ist of September, 1851, the following observations
were made on the same plantation. “The trees vary from six
inches to six feet in height. Most of them are between one
and two feet high. Many of them have a vigorous, healthy
aspect. Their advance, as a whole, does not come up to our
expectations. The Doctor said if they had not grown, it was
their own fault—as he had done nothing to prevent their grow-
ing ;—and we may add, he has done little to aid their growth,
since the first year. Seven-eighths of the young trees that
were first observed in the hills, are still living,—many of them
so involved in vines and grass as to demand searching obser-
vation to distinguish them. The English oaks show the best
growth, the yellow and black oaks the next, and the white oaks
stand in the third class for progress.”

On the 24th of September, 1852, the following observations
were made: “ The trees have been permitted to progress in
their own way the present season, without any culture what-
ever. The ground became covered with birches, briers, grass-
es, &c., without limit. A few days ago, all the birches, briers,
&c., were cut, and the earth was stirred about the young oaks to
the diameter of one foot, consequently their position was easily
distinguished. They vary in height from six inches to six feet;

118 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

the greater part of them have not attained a height of more
than one foot. No use has been made of the land since the
acorns were planted. The Doctor suggested, it might be well,
another season, to cut down the plants near the ground, and
let new shoots start up, with increased vigor, from the present
firmly imbedded roots.”

On the 30th of August, 1853, the plantation was viewed by
three of the committee, with several other gentlemen. Its
condition was not materially changed, from the description
above given. There are trees enough, but a small proportion
of them show any inclination to rise in the world.

Upon a view of the foregoing facts, the committee could see
but little encouragement for the growth of forests by planting
acorns on such land. In fact, the impression was general, if
the land was of any value for any other purpose, it would not
pay for continuing the fence about it for this purpose. Never-
theless, they express the hope, that the proprietor, whoever he
may be, will continue the enclosure, clear out the intermediate
growth, cut off the plants even with the ground, and give them
a chance to start anew another spring. It is much to be re-
eretted that the Doctor could not have lived to carry through
the experiment, and to give the committee and the public the
benefit of his observations ona class of culture in which he
felt a deep interest, and a good degree of confidence. That
the experiment has been conducted, substantially, in accord-
ance with the views of the donor, there is no room to doubt;
that a better growth of the trees might have been secured, by
more attention to preparing the land by subsoiling and manuring
before planting, and by clean culture during their growth, is
equally clear.

In view of all the circumstances, the committee are of opin-
ion, that the experiment has been so conducted as to entitle
the claimant, or his heirs, to the award of the one hundred
dollars, with the interest accrued thereon, and they recom-
mend that the same be paid accordingly.

In regard to the plantation made on the farm of Mr. Fay,
once visited by the committee, they were informed that a large
part of the trees were thrown out of the ground, or otherwise

FOREST TREES. 119

killed by the frost, and that the plantation was thereby so
much injured as not to be worthy of any further attention of
the committee.

Respectfully submitted,

Dran Rosinson, Chairman.

MippuieTon, August, 1853.

BARNSTABLE,

Report of the Committee.

During the last twenty years about one thousand acres have
been planted in this county with the seeds of the pitch pine.
The experiments have been successful, and the labor and capi-
tal profitably invested. The cultivation of other varieties of
forest trees has been attempted, but with little success. The
pitch pine is a native of this climate, hardy, and of rapid
growth, and of late years, has become as valuable for fuel, as
the harder varieties of wood.

Exeepting for ornamental purposes, the committee are not
aware, that any attempts have been made in this county to culti-
vate forest trees for timber. Soils that would produce trees
of sufficient size are more valuable for other purposes. The
white cedar, a tree found in many swamps in this county, we
think may be profitably cultivated for timber, and we hope
some member of the society will be induced to make the trial.
A gentleman at West Barnstable, states that about five years
ago, he set in a swamp, several small white cedar trees; that
they have grown rapidly, produced seed, and that hundreds of
young cedars have come up around them. This is valuable
information, as far as it goes; it only indicates what may be
done. There are hundreds of acres of swamps, now unpro-
ductive, which if planted with the white cedar, would become
yaluable to the owners, and be a source of wealth to the
county.

A sandy soil impoverished by repeated crops of grain, is the
best adapted to the culture of the pitch pine. On more fertile
soils, if the seeds germinate, the young trees will often be

120 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

destroyed by the thick grass around them. On loose beach
sand, the pitch pine becomes a shrub, rarely rising to the dig-
nity of a tree. An uneven surface is preferable to extensive
level plains, and a soil in which there is a small admixture of
loam, to one composed entirely of sand.

The pine cones or bolls of the growth of the current year,
should be gathered in autumn, before the frosts have opened the
burrs, and spread thinly over a floor, and exposed to the influ-
ence of the sun and air. In the course of the winter, most of
the burrs will open, and the seeds drop out. The wings should
be rubbed from the seed, and when winnowed it is in order to
plant. A more expeditious method is to put the bolls in pans,
and set them in a spent oven. The gentle heat opens the
burrs, and the seeds drop out.

The seed may be planted at any time, from the first of
December to the first of April. As a general rule, nature
points out the best season for sowing the seeds of plants,
whose habits have not changed by long cultivation. The seeds
of the pine begin to drop, immediately after the first frosts,
and very few will be found in the bolls after mid winter. As
the seed requires but a slight covering of earth, it shotld be
planted early, before there is much dry weather, otherwise, it
will not germinate.

A quart of clean seed is sufficient, if scantily planted, for
four acres. Some plant by making holes with a hoe, drop the
seed and cover with the fingers; and others plough furrows
across the land, and drop the seed at the bottom of the fur-
rows and cover with the hand. Both of these methods are
slow and expensive. A man with a horse, and a machine that
costs five dollars, can plant in a day, six acres, in drills six feet
apart. About a foot apart in the drills, is advisable. The
trees will not grow so thick, but allowance must be made for
bad seed and accidents.

There are thousands of acres in this county, that it would
be a public benefit to have planted with pines; they are now
waste, uncultivated, and unproductive; lands that the asses-
sors do not put upon their inventories; lands that the owners
consider valueless for tillage or pasture; but priceless for rail-
roads.

PLOUGHING. 121

But all these lands will not be wanted in this generation for
railroad purposes; they must be put to other uses, and if the
nominal owners will not improve them, as good citizens they
are bound to resign their title to those that will. Fuel and
timber are not the sole considerations that should have an influ-
ence. Plantations of trees afford shelter and protection to
the adjacent cultivated fields, rescue from sterility extensive
tracts, and clothe with verdure that which was before unsightly
and desolate. Facts are not wanting, that show conclusively,
that forests are of public utility. Thirty years ago, if one
acre, near White’s Brook, had been planted with pines, it would
have saved the town of Yarmouth five hundred dollars, and
individuals a like sum, contributed to stop the blowing sand,
which threatened to cover with desolation all the eastern part
of the town.

The peninsular of Provincetown, was originally, says Gos-
nold, covered with a forest and “a soil one spade deep.”
What fires, wantonly or carelessly set, have not destroyed, the
axe has cut down, and the loose soil has blown away, or been
covered with huge drifts of beach sand. Thousands of dol-
lars have been expended by the United States to fix those
drifting sands, and thousands more will have to be, before it is
accomplished. In like manner, the central part of Wellfleet
was made a desolate waste, and the same causes are now in
operation at South Dennis and Harwich, and if not counter-
acted, will produce like results.

Amos Otis, Chairman.

PLOUGHING.
WORCESTER.
From the Report of the Commitiee.

The history of the past goes plainly to show the plough to
be the corner-stone of education. The most diminutive mind
can instinctively perceive it to be the mighty instrument which
paves the road to wealth, literature, and morality.

16*

122 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

a

When we hear of the settlement of a new country, it is not
necessary to replete our minds with the ideal pictures of im-
agination in order that we may unravel the hidden mysterics
of futurity, so that we may know ¢hat nation’s rise and pro-
gress; but we can more definitely define its fate by making the
simple inquiry, Do they apply themselves assiduously to the
science of agriculture? and if in reply we are told that they
pride themselves in the arts of war, and scorn the tillage of
the soil, then we shall have discerned the decree of the fates,
and but a few years will serve to show that upon its course is
indellibly stamped the awful deerce, “Thy fate is death.” But
if, on the other hand, we are informed tat their cherished
pursuit is the agricultural, and the plough is the nation’s pride,
then will our good judgment tell us that the fairy Goddess of
Justice hath descended from the etherial regions, and with her
wand hath affixed upon that nation’s career that beloved motto,
“ Prosperity is thine;” and the pages of their history will she
interline with the garb of honor.

The spirit of competition, so rife in those who enlisted in the
ploughing match to-day, strongly indicates that the spirit of
progress, which always has so ennobled old Worcester County,
has waxed strong, and that brilliant flame of agricultural ad-
yancement now blazes with redoubled energy.

The interest of the ploughing match was somewhat enlivened
- by the appearance of a new patented plough (the Michigan
Double Mould Board) upon the field, and the noble service
which it performed gave it strong claims for a premium, which
would have been awarded had it not been for a diversity of
opinion in the minds of your committee as to whether it should
compete with those of former use. But your board of trus-
tees made a just decision in granting this plough an equal
chance hereafter with all others. To-day three of the same
kind of ploughs were entered, and your committee decided that
those had fairly earned a premium, which we awarded; and
we have no hesitation in saying that it is injustice to debar any
plough from competing with those which have received the
premiums heretofore. Competition is the order of the day,
and let him have the prize who wins the race. The other
ploughs have years ago written their own history in letters of

PLOUGHING. 123

gold, therefore it is useless for us to bestow upon them our
gifts of praise.

Your committee of last year, being duly convinced of the
glorious results which would emanate from the introduction of
the horse in competition with the ox, suggested the idea of
placing them on a par in competition for the premiums. And
highly gratified were your present committee in seeing that the
society have encouraged the farmer to train his horse for the
culture of the soil by offering a liberal premium. We were
also pleased to see that some of our farmers availed them-
selves in the contest for the “Golden Apple.” Two horse
teams were entered, and the azility, conciseness, and every
way perfect manner with which they discharged their labor cre-
ated a feeling of surprise in our minds, notwithstanding the
fixed certainty which we entertained.

Now that we have broached the subject of horse-training, we
would offer another suzzestion, which we candidly trust will
meet with your favorable consideration—that is, that the society
should offer favorable inducements for equestrian displays.
Perhaps some of the more eccentric portion of the community
may view this suggestion as one of too ancient a nature, or
even a vindication of woman’s rights, as one which should not
receive your approbation, inasmuch as its tendency does not
directly accord with agricultural improvements. We would
say to this class, bear in mind that our aim is not chiefly to
improve the soil, but to leave undone nothing which tends to
elevate and ennoble the brute race. We have had a brilliant
example set us by our sister States, who can most proudly
boast of the eminent results of this novel but praisewor-
thy experiment. Should your honorable board of trustees —
concede this new trial of competition a place beside those
which have graced our shows in years gone past, we have no
hesitation in saying, that so exciting would be the spirit of
rivalry that many of our fair daughters of Worcester County
would appear before us at our next annual exhibition, and by
their skilfulness in training the mounted steed, they would gain
the applause of all, and would add more to the interest of the
exhibition than aucht else could do.

The character of this exhibition has been of that glorious

124 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

nature which will highly honor 1853, and give it more than
equal footing in the scroll of the past. As old father time
shall plough each successive year into the furrows of the past,
may the interest of our exhibition gain increase until we shall
have attained the goal of perfection.

Otis ADAMS, Chairman.

WORCESTER NORTH.

From the Report of the Committee.

The best piece of ground that could be obtained for the pur-
pose, was on the Fitchburg Poor Farm, in a field of some four
acres, so uneven and stony as to prevent the land being laid
out for the workmen in parallel lines. The soil was a deep
solid loam, and somewhat stony, with a tough sward; making
it a very undesirable task for the competitors, though quite as
easy for the committee to determine the comparative skill of
the ploughmen and the strength and training of their teams, as
in a more easy and friable soil. No time was specified in
which the work was to be performed, your committce believ.
ing it much more important that the ground should be well
ploughed than rapidly ploughed,—though, every thing else be-
ing equal, dispatch should be considered worthy of merit.

There were eleven teams that performed their task, and
taking into consideration the hardness of the soil, the task was
well performed.

There were many things to be considered by the committee
in judging of the merit and demerit of the various competitors.
They hesitated, examined, and reéxamined the work per-
formed, before they could satisfy their own judgments in
making the awards.

A number of teams were unable to plough the required
depth, (seven inches.) Some of the competitors did not turn
the furrow quite flat and smooth enough to be considered per-
fect workmen. One or two others performed with their hands
and their feet what should have been performed with the -

PLOUGHING. 125

plough. But the work, on the whole, was admirably perform-
ed,—quite as well as in any preceding year.

Some of the teams performed their work in as thoroueh and
workmanlike manner as we ever witnessed. Not a flaw could
be discovered in the ploughman, his team, or their work; and
they all did their work remarkably well, abating some of the
defects we have mentioned.

Before closing our report the committee wish to make one
or two suggestions in relation to this important labor of the
husbandman.

The plough, the harrow, the shovel, and the hoe; though
varying in their forms of manufacture, are of universal use by
farmers in all countries of the globe; but the plough is much
more important than any other, and probably than all others
put together. Hither of the others could be dispensed with,
though with great detriment to the farmer. But the plough
could not, without clogging the wheels, and stopping the pro-
gress of civilized life. It must be used in the preparation of
the soil for all of the crops of the grasses, grains and vegeta-
bles, of every nation; and he who improves the manufacture of
the plough, or learns and teaches others best how to use it,
ought to be considered the benefactor of his race.

Who can estimate the pecuniary advantage to the people of
our own State, of New England, and the whole country, in the
improvement in the manufacture of ploughs by Ruggles, Nourse,
Mason & Co. and Prouty & Mears, not to mention many others
engaged on a large scale in their manufacture.

The committee would express their convictions of the im-
portance of deep ploughing in almost every kind and quality of
soil. It has been required, in the ploughing match to-day, to
plough seven inches; but that, in most soils, is too shallow.
When it is recollected that the roots of many grasses descend
as deep as eight or nine inches in search of food, and that the
roots of many vegetables go as deep as two or three feet and
more, it will at once be seen that the common depth of plough-
ing, at the present time—though we plough much deeper than
was practised fifteen or twenty years since—is far too shallow.
If the soil is shallow and poor, the more need of deep plough-
ing, and every time such soil is ploughed the depth should be

126 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

increased, inch by inch, until the whole surface of the ground ig
thoroughly pulverized, nine or ten inches from the surface; thus
giving the ground greater capacity to throw toward the surface
the salts that lie buried in its bosom, to mingle with the gases
of the atmosphere, and thus give the greatest possible amount
of food to the vegetable kingdom; and if we had but two words
to say to all tillers of the ground, they should be, “plough
deep,’ and more abundant and rich will be the crops that mother
earth shall give in return for your labor.

Josoua T. Everert, Chairman.

HAMPSHIRE, FRANKLIN AND HAMPDEN.

From the Report of the Committee.

There are various significations given to the term ploughing;
and although Webster says that ploughing means turning up the
ground with the plough, yet the sailor assures us that he ploughs
the mighty deep, and the Philistines ploughed with Mrs. Sampson
to obtain the secret of the great strength of her husband, and
many a news-monger and gossip of the present day is devotedly
pursuing the same avocation, with the earnest desire of obtain-
ing the secrets of families and neighborhoods, and they plough
deep too, and do not hesitate to cross-plough until they have
pulverized the whole matter.

The plough, the loom and the anvil, are often represented
as the most important implements necessary to the success of
the husbandman and the artisan. In one view, perhaps, the
anvil should hold the first place, as with it or on it are forged
some of the most necessary appurtenances of the plough and
the loom, the blacksmith holding the place of chief or king
among that important and respectable portion of the commu-
nity known as mechanics.

It is within the remembrance of many of us when the plough
share was almost wholly formed on the anvil, and a frequent
resort to it was indispensable for the sharpening of the instru-
ment.

The improvements in this most necessary implement of hus-
bandry, within a few years, have been astonishingly great, and

PLOUGHING. 127

your committee are of opinion that taking into view its exten-
sive use, all the encouragement given by the Commonwealth
and individual citizens to our agricultural societies, has been
amply repaid by the success of the efforts for its improvement;
still perfection is not probably yet attained.

Thirty years since, two yokes of oxen and a horse to lead
them, were considered necessary to turn over sward land, one
sturdy man well braced at an angle of 45 degrees, one to clear
the plough, and occasionally ride on the beam, one driver, with
ponderous goad and snapping lash, and the youngest son to
ride the leader, were considered indispensable to a pleasant
and successful prosecution of the work, while the whole estab-
lishment was often obliged to come to a full stop to replace
refractory furrows in the rear.

We yesterday witnessed the pleasing results of the ingenuity
of our plough-makers, and the facility and ease with which one
man, or two men and pair, will execute more and better work
in a given time, than could be performed by double the amount
of strength, a few years since.

Evisoa Epwarps, Chairman.

HAMPSHIRE.

From the Report of the Committee.

Was the plough used by Adam? “And the Lord God planted
a garden eastward in Eden, and there he put the man whom he
had formed.” — Gen. ii. 8. After planting, we find that “The
Lord God took the man, and put him into the garden of Eden
to dress it, and to keep it.” —- Gen. il. 15,

Let us, for a moment, contemplate the man, created by divine
wisdom for agricultural pursuits. In his physical nature, he
was a finished production of infinite skill. Intellectually, as a
perfect model, he must have stood at a height that none of his
descendants can hope to reach; while, upon his moral nature,
no blizhting stain had fallen. The lineaments of an endless
life were h’s.

For such a man, the cultivation of the ground was deemed
by the Creator, a suitable employment. But we are not in-

128 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

formed in regard to the manner in which Adam carried on his.
farming operations. Weare not told whether he used a spade
or plough, rake or harrow, hoe or corn-planter. We feel quite
sure, however, that in the absence of the sons of the “Nmerald
Isle,” he could not have relied exclusively on the spade, in pre-
paration of the soil, even before the thorns and bricrs came.
It will not at all surprise us, if, at some future day, a Layard
should exhume from the garden of Eden the original pattern
of the genuine Michigan Plough.

To the successful prosecution of agricultural pursuits, a
thorough preparation of the soil for the reception of seed, is
essential. One of the most, if not, indeed, the most, essential
implement for the accomplishment of this object, is the plough.
The office of a plough is to stir and turn over the soil from a
suitable depth, leaving it in a light and thoroughly pulverized
condition. It is not enough that the ground is simply turned
upside down. A plough may be capable of doing this in the
most perfect manner, and still be very imperfect; for, it is easy
to see that, so far as it fails to pulverize and render the furrow
light, a necessity is created for the additional labor of the
harrow.

It is proper, also, in forming our estimate of the true value
of a plough, to consider the strength of team necessary, and
the ease with which it can be managed.

In regard to the question so much agitated at the present
time, whether the plough shall run deep or shallow, we say,
as a general rule, let the plough run deep, or else follow it with
the subsoil. We believe that, in this conclusion, we are sus-
tained by reason and experience. A given quantity of soil may
not occupy a larger space, after having been thoroughly stirred,
than it did in its natural state; still its new condition is more
favorable to the growth of the plant, whose roots are to pene-
trate and draw their sustenance from it.

To any one who has observed the great depth to which the
delicate fibres penctrate, it is perfectly obvious, that every ob-
stacle should be removed, which might hinder their progress.
Still farther, other things being equal, we suppose it to be a
point which experience has fairly settled, that the ability of a
plant to sustain itself during a drought, will correspond with

PLOUGHING. 129

the depth to which the soil has been stirred, and it would seem
strange, if, in a section so liable to suffer in this way as our
own, any farmer should fail to avail himself of decp ploughing.

FRANKLIN.

From the Report of ihe Committee.

Good ploughing may truly be said to be the very ground-
work of successful husbandry, and without it no man can real-
ize such results as ought to satisfy his reasonable expectations.
There is now little or no difference of opinion, among those
who have examined the subject, as to what constitutes good \
ploughing, viz.:—a thorough disintegration, or breaking up of
the soil to a sufficient depth to afford the roots of the different
crops ample room to spread in pursuit of nourishment and
moisture. There is far more danger of falling short of, than of
exceeding, the requisite depth; and there is no doubt that a
large portion of the land cultivated in New England, might be
made to produce greatly increased crops, by deeper and more
thorough ploughing than it now receives.

Your committee are willing that the axe, the real pioneer of
civilization, should take precedence of the plough; but they
claim for the cattle the second place in the respect, the grati-
tude and the affection of every true farmer. And they are the
more anxious that its rights should be distinctly acknowledged
and honored now, inasmuch as a machine has been invented
which, it is claimed, will do the work of the plough more
thoroughly and cheaply, and which, in the progress of events,
threatens to crowd it-from its position. We are not prepared
to say that such a consummation is not devoutly to be wished,
because it must be conceded that every real improvement in
agricultural implements is a rich gift to the whole people. To
such a degree of perfection has the plough been brought that it
may be safely left to defend itself, by its own intrinsic merits,
against any mere pretender to superior excellence. And when
the day shall come for it to retire from active service, it can

look back upon many centuries of honorable usefulness, and
Li

130 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

make its exit in the proud consciousness of duty fulfilled, and
destiny gracefully submitted to.

The different machines already invented to supersede the
plough, on lands free from roots, stones, and other obstructions,
have been so fully described in the agricultural papers, that the
general principle which pervades them all, is well understood.
But it may not be amiss to say, that one which has recently
been subjected to several trials is described by an English
writer as “quite the reverse of the plough. The latter isa
- pressing, the former a lifting operation; the one consolidates
the subsoil, the other fractures it; the one plasters like a ma-
son’s trowel, the other lightens like a fork. The one is the
operation of a wedge, the other of a lever. Hence the result
is not only different, but, we may say, opposite on the soil.”
“We say not whether this individual implement is calculated
for general use or not,” adds the writer, “but we do, most un-
hesitatinely, that the principle of a digging or forking machine
is fully established.”

Mr. Mechi, an eminent experimental farmer in England,
says in a recent letter to the London Times :—“I have re-
ceived from one of our North American colonies the model of
a newly invented machine, which, by a happy and most simple
combination of horse and steam power, will not only deeply,
cheaply and efficiently, cultivate and pulverize the soil, but, at
the same time, sow the seed, and leave all in a finished condi-
tion. It will also, by a simple inversion, cut and gather the
erain, without any rake or other complication; while both in
cultivating and harvesting, its operation will be continuous and
without stoppage.”

In view of the progress already made, as detailed in the fore-
going extract, it can scarcely be doubted that some of us will
live to see these predictions measurably realized—if not by any
implement yet invented, still by one to be constructed by the
genius of an age which refuses to halt short of perfection, and
completely ignores the existence of the verb to fail. If the
colonies have produced an implement which will not only
plough the land, but sow the seed and reap and gather up the
crop, have not the Yankees a right to complain that it only re-
mains for some one of them to affix to it an apparatus which

PLOUGHING. 151

will thresh, winnow, grind and bake the grain, and cull, split
and braid the straw ?

At the ploughing match there were in all ten entries, viz. :—
three “double teams” of four oxen each, with drivers; four
“single teams,” of two oxen each, without drivers; two horse
teams, of two horses each, without drivers; and one team of
two oxen, with a driver, entered for the premium for the best
specimen of ploughing with the soil and subsoil plough. The
work was done in a manner to reflect the highest credit on
those who performed it, and your committee are happy to say
that all the premiums awarded are richly deserved. Each
team ploughed one-eighth of an acre—the double teams eight
inches deep, and the single teams seven inches deep.

The mininum time occupied in ploughing, (each lot having
been previously furrowed out,) was 25 minutes—the maximum,
35 minutes. The committee did not, in awarding the premi-
ums, take into consideration, at all, the comparative time of the
different teams, deeming that to be of no importance. They
considered only the workmanlike execution which was pro-
duced.

Hucu W. Green, Chairman.

BERKSHIRE.

Report of the Committee.

The committee on the ploughing-match having attended to
their duties, ask leave to submit the following report :—Where-
as the usages of the Berkshire Agricultural Society have been
such for more than a quarter of a century as to render it neces-
sary that the report on the ploughing match should be made
prior to the speeding of the plough; and whereas a majority of
the chairmen of the committees on ploughing have been by pro-
fession better acquainted with writing than ploughing; it is no
wonder that the society has heard so much, both in prose and
verse, about the beauty of an autumnal morn, the silent gran-
deur of Old Greylock, and the deep interest manifested by the
many of both sexes that congregate around the field of compe-
tition to take a superficial view of the obedient stcer that bows

132 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

a

his neck to upheave the tufted sod;—and so little about the
one thing necessary to agricultural success—good ploughing.
Your committee, with all due respect for former practical cus-
toms and opinions, have excused themselves from following
round and round in the furrows of their predecessors, and
would only say of the wind on the morning of the ploughing
match, that all present must recollect whether it blew “hot or
cold.” Your committee were greatly embarrassed in the dis-
charge of their duties. As the ploughing progressed, we applied
the rules prescribed by the society, to the depth and width of
the furrow, and found that there was a great deficiency. The
ploughmen were informed of their errors, but still they went
on, caring for nothing but to make good time and get the
premium. It is sometimes said that “good beginning makes
bad ending ;” we are of the opinion that the work done at the
setting in of the plough was not good enough to affect the poor
work done at the turning out of the plough, or, in other words,
the ploughing was not what the regulations of the county re-
quired it should be; neither was it what it should have been
with a perfect Worcester plough, drawn by a Berkshire team,
and guided by the strength and skill of a Berkshire farmer.
The embarrassments of your committee were not at all removed
when the last ploughman cried “whoa”; for there were awards
to be made which were offered on certain conditions, and these
conditions had not been complied with. Your committee were
unanimous in their opinions as to what ought to be done. They
also agreed that, under all the circumstances, it would not
answer to withhold all the premiums, consequently they have
made some awards: and call the attention of the society to the
importance of having the rules of the society strictly complied
with, or banish the rules on ploughing, and let every man plough
according to the dictates of his own understanding, then let the
committee award the premiums where the merit lies.

MarsHauL Sears, Chairman.

PLOUGHING. 133

PLYMOUTH.

Leonard Hill’s Statement.

Subsoiling.—I enter my claim for a premium on an acre of
Indian corn, and for subsoiling half of the same. The land
is a deep clayey soil, with a hard pan beneath, mixed with
eravel. It was mowed in 1851, and produced about three-
quarters of a ton of English hay to the acre. In 1852 it was
ploughed, and planted to Indian corn, and a good crop of about
forty bushels to the acre was realized. In May, 1853, I carted
on and spread ten cords over the whole acre, (five cords on
each half acre,) of good barn and hog manure from Mr. Ho-
bart’s barn cellar, where he had fed twenty head of cattle last
winter, and also five or six hogs. This manure was all shovel-
led over in April, four weeks previous to being spread on the
field. On the 14th of May ploughed one-half, with a heavy
plough, seven inches deep, following with a subsoil plough,
seven inches deeper. The other part I ploughed with a com-
mon plough, eight inches deep; harrowed it once, then fur-
rowed it, about three feet apart; I then put into the furrows
two cords of compost, mostly soil; one cord on each half acre.
I put three kernels in a hill, two feet apart, of the eight-rowed
white corn, a kind I have raised for many years, (sometimes
called smutty white.) The planting was done from 23d to 25th
of May. On the 10th of June, ploughed and hoed both pieces,
that subsoiled and that not subsoiled. On the 15th, hoed both
pieces without ploughing; 22d, ploughed one furrow in a row,
and hoed the two half acres; 28th, hoed and killed weeds on
both pieces which had been manured and cultivated alike.

I would here remark with regard to the subsoiling, that when
the subsoil is so extremely hard that the moisture cannot pene-
trate so easily as in many kinds of land, it is evident that sub-
soiling is beneficial; and in both extremes of wet and dry, I
think it of use, and that it ought to be done in such soils.

In September, (about the middle,) I cut the top stalks on both
parts. October 15th, the supervisor harvested and weighed
two rods, selected from different parts of the field, which

134 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

weighed 1033 Ibs., which, at 85 lbs. to the bushel, is 9788
bushels. '

October 20th, harvested and weighed the crop produced from
the subsoiled part, and ascertained that to be 5537 bushels,
and also that from the part not subsoiled, to be 4527 bushels;
which, allowing 85 lbs. in the ear to the bushel, makes 101,%
bushels to the acre.

Expenses :—

Ploughing, and subsoiling, 4 acre, . : ! : $7 50
Furrowing one way, . : ; . ‘ : 6)
Planting, : 4 50
Hoeing three times, 6 00
Killing weeds, 1 00
Cutting stalks, 2 25
Harvesting,. . 7 50

$29 40

I have allowed nothing for carting manure.

BRISTOL.

From the Report of the Committee.

The committee on ploughing with oxen, adopted the follow-
ing rules, which would govern them in their decision of the
work, and made the same known to the competitors before the
trial.

1st. Thorough pulverization of the soil.

2d. Narrow furrows, well turned, not less than eight inches
in depth.

3d. The lots of one-eighth of anacre each, to be ploughed in
fifty-five minutes.

The lands were all ploughed the required depth, and within
the time, and the committee are happy to say that the work

was exceedingly well performed; better, we think, than on any .

previous year.
The Michigan, or Double Plough, was the only one used.

J. G. Lawton, Jr., Chairman.

MANURES. 135

MANURES.

No subject is of greater importance to the farmer, than that
of manures. On his facilities for procuring them in sufficient
quantity, either from the natural resources of his farm, or from
other sources, as resorting to artificial manures from the market,
depend his ability to raise large» crops, and, at the same time,
to secure the permanent improvement of his land.

In addition to the use of barnyard manures, and such other
materials as may be made from the natural resources of the
farm, and the use of guano, super-phosphate and special ma-
nures, in this State, some experiments have been made in the
use of tan, which, in certain sections, can be had in considera-
ble quantity.

The value of tan may be stated in the words of a letter of
_ James J. Conover, Esq., of New Jersey, to the Hon. William
Sutton, of Salem. “About the 25th of March,” he says, under
date of Dec. 28, 1853, “I planted three acres, (most of it a
gravelly loam) with the common Mercer potatoes. On the
largest part of this, I put one small shovelful of spent tan,
composted one year previously with lime, and then covered
with soil. Ona small portion I put our first quality of blue
shell marl, and covered them as the others, and on the rest I
put a shovelful of compost, made of barnyard manure and rich
earth.

“The crop was light on the whole piece, and, as I did not go
into the measurement of ground, [cannot give acorrect account
of the crop, but I was fully satisfied that the tanned potatoes
yielded more bushels than either of the others, and of a far
superior quality. About the 20th of April I planted three
acres more, on nearly all of which I put the tan and lime com-
post as before, excepting a few rows, by way of experiment,
on which I put tan in its raw state from the yard. On some I
put barnyard compost, the same as in the other patch, and on
some I put a handful of charcoal dust and ashes, which I gath-
ered from what we call charcoal heaths here in the Jerseys,
where charcoal is burned in pits or kilns, from common pine
wood. Now for the result.

136 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

a

“No. 1. Planted with tan only, yielded me a fine crop of large,
smooth, white potatoes, the best yield in the lot.

“No. 2. Planted with the tan and lime, nearly the same, but
not quite so smooth.

“No. 3. Planted with charcoal ashes, the largest potatoes,
but not so many in the hill; a good yield, and, taking into con- —
sideration the expense of putting on, it was quite as valuable
a crop as either of the others.

“No. 4. Planted with compost from the barnyard; a good
crop, but the poorest in the lot. The soil of this lot was a
clay loam, and yielded one hundred bushels peracre. The pota-
toes were all Mercers.

“ One of my neighbors composted twenty bushels of tan, with
one of guano, which yielded a fine crop. He thinks two of
guano to twenty of tan would be better. I have carted 1,500
bushels into my cattle-yard this fall, and intend to cart four or
five thousand bushels for planting potatoes. I am well satis-
fied that the potatoes are of a superior quality.”

Experiments have also been made in turning in crops as a
manure.

ESSEX.

From the Report of the Committee.

It is to be regretted that the liberal premiums offered by the
society, to test the value of crops turned in as a manure, should,
for several years, have failed to elicit any well-conducted ex-
periment on this subject.

Ploughing in green crops as a means of fertilizing, has been
attended with striking results, and it has the additional advan-
taze of being a highly cleansing process. Weeds of annual.
growth, very pernicious to cultivated crops, may be, by judi
cious ploughing, very nearly eradicated. The charlick, or wild
mustard, which formerly choked any summer grain on the farm
of the writer, has, by this means, ceased to be any longer
troublesome. By this process, the town of Haverhill, some years
since, obtained the society’s premium for a crop of rye, and it
has been continued on their farm ever since, with decided benefit.

MANURES. 137

Some persons have objected to ploughing light land in sum-
mer, that more is frequently lost by the wind blowing off the
finer parts of the soil, than is gained by turning in the weeds.
But if such land is ploughed while the soil is moist and imme-
diately rolled, this evil will be nearly prevented.

The expense of drawing manure a long distance, in addition
to its high price, deters many farmers of small means from
purchasing ; and much of their land is imperfectly, and, conse-
quently, unprofitably cultivated. Yet most of these persons
have teams, which might perform the labor of turning in crops
with very little actual cost to the owners, provided they could
be assured, by decisive experiments, that the condition of their
lands could be improved. And though itis not probable that
land regularly cropped, can be enriched, or even kept from de-
teriorating for any length of time, by any process, without
occasionally applying manure, yet it is believed that turning in
crops, green or dry, may be found to be an important part of
an enriching process.

In Mr. Porter’s statement, in 1851, of the management of
his farm, we are informed that turning in a clover lay consti-
tuted a part of his method of bringing his land to a highly pro-
ductive state. And as he is still carrying on that system of
rotation, it is much to be desired that he would furnish us with
a detailed statement, from which might be learned the value of
this part of the process. In other portions of the county, and
even of our State, a clover lay turned in, has been considered
almost essential to the successful cultivation of some soils, and
no good reason is known to exist, why it should not be equally
beneficial in this county.

In the absence of any claim for premium on this subject,
these suggestions are offered, with the hope of inducing some
one to furnish us with the result of further experiments.

s

Joun Krery, Chairman.

18*

138 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

WORCESTER.

Statement of Thomas § I. S. Meriam.

The plan adopted by us in making and applying manures, is
as follows: All manures used for crops remain in the yard and
cellar until spring, and as soon as the yard is clear, we get into
our barnyard a supply of swamp mud, which we usually get
out the winter previous into piles; for our hogyard we use loam
and all waste matter. Before we get it out in the spring, we
collect it all together under the barn, having a cellar under the
whole of the barn, but thirty-six feet is divided ‘off and so
arranged that the manure from the horse stable and ox lean-te
drop into this part, and also to winter the hogs in. As soon
as the frost is sufficiently out, we spread all waste hay and
straw that remains in the yard, and apply plaster freely, spread-
ing it over the whole surface; we then cart our hog manure
under the barn, and spread that over the whole surface, still
applying the plaster; next the heaps from under the stables,
lean-tos, and yard, are spread over the whole, and another coat
ef plaster. At this stage, we commence and shovel it all over,
mixing and pulverizing it as much as possible, then we let it
remain for two or three weeks until it becomes thoroughly de-
composed, and in a good state for use, having kept its full
strength, and by the use of plaster we saved all the ammonia.
We make, annually, about three hundred cart-loads of manure.

We apply our manure in the following manner: For corn
crop, we cart with one team to the lot intended for corn, and
spread and plough it under as soon as possible, not often suf-
fering it to remain in the field over twenty-four hours, and as
much less time as possible. For grass, in all cases where it
can be ploughed, we do it about the first of September, being
careful to turn over the furrow as smooth as possible, and fol-
low the plough with the roller; we then apply about twenty
loads of manure to the acre, being prepared as before stated,
sow hay seed, harrow and roll.

We have also another method of preparing manure, in the
spring, which we call guano. We generally gather from our
dove house, about thirty bushels of manure, which we mix with

MANURES. 139

swamp mud and plaster, putting about cight bushels of dove
manure and six hundred pounds of plaster, to a large cart-buck
full of swamp mud, mix them well together, and put a small
handful in the hill at the time we plant the corn. The mud, in
all cases, if possible, to remain out in piles through one winter
before using, so that the frosts can act upon it.

Auburn, October 24, 1853.

HAMPSHIRE.

Report of the Committee.

Every farmer has on his own farm, valuable materials for
compost manure. The modes of manufacture, and of applica-
tion, are well known. Let the good farmers of old Hampshire
awake to the importance of making compost by hundreds of
vads, and spreading it broadcast on the lands to which it is
best adapted. You will double your crops, and enhance the
value of your lands in like proportion. Mr. Rankin’s method
is worthy of imitation.

We recommend the turning in of green crops, as a fertilizer
of the soil. Mr. Kelita Hubbard, of North Sunderland, has
been successful, as appears by his statement of the benefits
derived from actual trial, the past two years. As he has
abundance of muck in his possession, we hope he will dig it out
and apply it to his land, to which it is well adapted, spreading
it without measure, and be rewarded accordingly.

The valuable experiments of Mr. Albert Montague, of Sun-
derland, are worthy of attentive consideration. Hvery farmer
would do well to make similar trials, and he will soon know
what are his most profitable fertilizers. Mr. Montague’s ex-
periments show that super-phosphate of lime, whatever may be
its intrinsic value and its usefulness on other soils, is not profit-
able for farmers whose lands are low, wet, and cold. Provi-
dence has given him a muck swamp—he has no occasion for
super-phosphate, at five dollars a bag.

SamMuEL Powers, Chairman.

140 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

Statement of Ansel A. Rankin.

In making my statement, perhaps it may be well to give the
construction of my barn cellar, in which I make my manure.
My cellar is sixty feet by forty. My barn points, or is open on
the west side; my stables for neat cattle are on the east side,
and under them, is my hogsty. Into this sty, the excre-
ments and urine of the cattle pass. My cattle are stabled
every night during the summer, as well as winter. I clear
out the whole of the manure in the spring, and then before
erecting the pens, I cart in as much loam as is practicable.
This is done easily, as the cellar is sufficiently deep to admit
of dumping the cart. I then erect the pens and let my swine
commence their operations. As fast as occasion requires, I
add fresh loam, and spread the excrement from the cattle, if
the swine do not root it sufficiently. By this method, I have
made, from six swine, one horse, two oxen, and four cows, one
hundred and forty cart-loads of first rate manure. I consider
the urine of as much value as the solid part of the excrement.

Prtuam, October 26, 1853.

Statement of Kelifa Hubbard.

I have practised turning in rye as manure, for several years,
with good success. I plough my land as soon as convenient
after the crop is taken off. The feed in the fall will pay for
ploughing and seed. I turn in the crop in the spring, where the
soil is light. I think it is equal to five loads of manure to the
acre. It destroys the weeds, pulverizes the land, and thus
saves much labor in the cultivation of the next year. Nearly
seed enough scatters, if the crop is dry, when gathered. It
can be ploughed when the team has but little to do, and can
get their living in the pasture.

SUNDERLAND, October 27, 1853.

MANURES. 141

Experiments of Albert Montague.

In these days of progress, when every one wishes to be
profiting by his neighbor’s experience, we are liable to do as
our neighbor has done, without considering whether it will be
for our benefit. We are apt to think what has produced great
erops for him, will certainly fill our barns and granarics. Do
we not need a Jittle of the conservative, as well as much of the
progressive? I am led to these reflections, from the fact of
having, in a small way, during the past season, experimented
faithfully with foreign manures, but have not received the anti-
<ipated benefit. I propose to state these experiments, with
their cost and profit. My farm lies in Sunderland. The soil
is sandy loam, with a trifle of marl. It is rather low, so much
so, that in cold or wet seasons, corn is liable to be bitten by
frost, before fully ripe, unless it gets an early start. I have
usually, for this reason, put part of the manure, applied to my
corn land, in the hill. Last spring I purchased two bags of
Prof. Mapes’ Improved Super-phosphate of Lime, and used it
apon several different pieces in the following manner :-—

Piece No. 1 was grass land which had been top-dressed for
four or five years. Upon thirty square rods I spread thirty-
seven and a half pounds of improved phosphate, which, when
applied, cost one dollar twenty-five cents. Upon a piece ad-
joining, of like soil, in same condition, I applied the same value
of rotted manure and obtained one-fourth more hay from the
manured ground.

Piece No. 2 was grass land which had been top-dressed with
well rotted manure. I sowed thirty-seven and a half pounds of
improved phosphate upon thirty rods—which cost, when ap-
plied, ene dollar and twenty-five cents. 1 cut about three
hundred pounds more of hay from these thirty rods than from
an adjoining thirty rods treated in the same manner, except

that phosphate was not applied. ,

Piece No. 3 was broomeorn. Upon two rods I put five
pounds of improved phosphate. I manured two other rods
with manure from my hogpen, at the rate of ten loads to the
acre, which was of about the same value as the super-phos-
phate. I applied both manures and phosphate in the hill. The

142 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

result was, that the two rods planted with improved phosphate
produced about half as much broomcorn, as the two rods,
fertilized only with hog manure.

Piece No. 4 was manured in the hill, just before planting,
with improved super-phosphate of lime, put upon alternate
rows. ‘The rows where it was applied were much the largest
and best colored, during the second and third hoeings—the
earliest in ripening—and I think will yield fifty pounds more of
brush.

Piece No. 5 was one-fourth of an acre of Indian corn, on
which J applied forty pounds of improved phosphate, dropped
on manure in the hill. The result was about two and one-
half bushels of corn more, than on an equal quantity of ground,
of similar soil, treated in like manner, except that the improved
phosphate was not applied.

This finished one bag of the phosphate—the expense of it
applied, was $5, and the extra amount received from its use
was about $10, and my net gain $5.

I experimented, in like manner, upon other pieces of broom-
corn and Indian corn, both before and after planting, and during
the first and second hoeings—but could see no effects whatever
from it-

I also purchased twenty bushels of oyster-shell lime, and
applied it for corn; some in the hill, and some broadcast—
some with, and some without manure; but, if there is any good-
ness in it for my soil, it is yet to be seen.

I also purchased salt to assist me in my labors to make corn
grow. I put some in the hill, sowed some at the rate of five
bushels, and some at the rate of one bushel to the acre. The
corn all grew alike, and the worms eat it without reference to
the salt. :

Another experiment was successful. In August, 1853, I
made a muck-heap from the swamp, and let it le exposed to
frosts and air, until about the middle of April. Then J carted
it to my lot designed for corn, and there, mixing three loads of
it with one load of stable manure, and one bushel of ashes to a
load, which caused it to heat powerfully; I made a compost,
which I applied in the hill, side by side with manure not so
composted. The corn upon the compost was larger, of better

MANURES. 143

color in June and July, and was heavier when harvested. The
jand upon which I put it is rather poor—not my best corn land.
I think the yield will be thirty-five or forty bushels to the acre.
Tused three loads of manure, and nine loads of muck to the
acre—valued at six dollars. Others may receive great benefit
from artificial manures, but some may, with me, think that so
long as nature has provided, in our swamps, vast stores of that
which will cause corn to grow, and the “wilderness to bud and
blossom as the rose,” it is best to draw upon the swamps.

SuNDERLAND, October 20, 1853.

NORFOLK.
From the Report of the Committee on Farms.

Use of Guano.—The question is frequently asked, “If guano,
at the cost of fifty dollars per ton, can be profitably used on
our soil;” and also, “if the benefit, where it is at all apparent,
is not entirely exhausted by the crop which it first nourishes ?”
In reply, we have to state that a farmer in this county, while
yet doubtful of its value as a lasting fertilizer, made with it
the following experiments : —

A piece of grass land, which, for several years, had yielded
only small return for mowing, was carefully turned up with a
large grass plough, about the last week in August, stirring the
soil to the depth of eight inches. It was then rolled with a
stone roller and Jaid level. This operation was followed by
using twice the large square harrow. Peruvian euano, of more
than ordinary excellence, mixed thoroughly with coarse sand,
—in order to spread it more evenly,—was then spread, with
the hand, at the rate of three hundred and fifty pounds per acre.
The cultivator was now drawn over it lengthwise and across
it. The grass seed then was sown, at the rate of five pecks
redtop and ten quarts herds-grass per acre. This was followed
by the brush harrow, and the whole piece was left perfectly
élean and level. The soil varied, in different parts of the field,
from a light, gravelly, to a deep, moist loam. The seed ger-
minated quickly, and covered the surface, before winter, with a
good body of grass. This was not much injured by the severity

144 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

a

of winter’s frost, except in a few low spots. With the return
of spring the grass grew rapidly, vigorously and evenly. The
first return of hay was quite two tons to the acre ;—the year
following the yield was larger ; and for four succeeding years, it
has been, at no time, less than one and a half tons to the acre,
with no other manure, during the time, than two light dressings
of compost.

This field was distant from the farmer’s barn nearly a quar-
ter of a mile, and he believes it would have cost more time,
labor and money, to have drawn and applied manure from his
barn, sufficient for the first outlay, than did the whole quantity
of guano and the subsequent dressings of compost require.

To confirm this statement, he adds, that a second trial was
made, next year, on an adjoining piece of nearly similar land,
and with equally beneficial results. Here the effect of the
guano is yet seen, after four years’ cropping, in the earlier
greenness and growth of the grass, both before and after mow-
ing, compared with that on an adjoining piece of precisely simi-
lar soil, which was laid down one year later, and had received
the benefit of two years’ tillage and two heavy dressings of
barn manure.

The piece first mentioned has since been laid down anew, at
the same season of the year, with a fair dressing of barn ma-
nure, and in the spring following with a good dressing of plaster
and ashes, (guano not being found at the time in the market ;)}
but without any thing like similar results.

Greatly beneficial results have been observed, by the same
farmer, from the use of guano, upon wheat and other small
erains, upon corn fodder, beans, peas, cabbages, squash, and
other vines, young fruit trees, currant and other bushes. In-
deed, there is no article of horticulture or field culture to which
the judicious application of this manure, would not, he believes,
be of great service.

The experience and observation of this farmer lead him,
therefore to venture the opinion that our farms would be, in all
respects, benefited, and the expense of cultivation lessened by a
judicious and liberal use of guano, wherever barn manure,
though it were a gift, must be carted more than half a mile.
In this opinion he is confirmed by the extraordinary effects

MANURES. 145

produced on the nearly exhausted soils of Virginia, and Mary-
land, and Kentucky, and North Carolina, of which reliable
accounts are given in the publications of the day.

Phosphates and Super-phosphates of Lime.—Of the value
of these fertilizers and their effects, neither experience nor
observation enables us to speak with confidence. From the re-
marks made to us by judicious and intelligent farmers, and from
the favorable accounts, which we presume are in all respects
reliable, given of experiments made with them, we are induced
to urge upon the farmers of this county the careful and thorough
trial of their use in different modes of operation, and upon dif-
ferent sorts of vegetable culture. We believe that every new
discovery in this department of agriculture, and every instance
of the successful application of concentrated manure to the soil,
is of vast importance to the farmer, and will help to lessen the
hardships of his occupation, to increase the sum of his gains,
and to enlarge the opportunity for his rest and intellectual and
social enjoyment and improvement.

PLYMOUTH.

:
Report of the Conumittee.

In respect to the preparation for manure, it should not be
forgotten that the excretions voided by an animal,—a cow or
an ox, for instance,—during the time when usually housed and
yarded, if carefully saved and properly composted, with good
facilities for doing this, are capable of converting into valuable
manure only a limited quantity of absorbent material. What
is that quantity? This, of course, will depend, in some de-
gree, upon the nature and amount of the food consumed.
What is the quantity, then,—or, rather, what is the maximum
average of such material, estimated per head, to which the ex-
cretions from an ordinary stock of neat cattle, as generally kept,
can be made to impart the virtues of good manure? This is a
very important question, any thing approximating to a correct
solution of which, would greatly facilitate a just estimate of
the value of the composts offered for premium, composed, as
they generally are, mostly of such ingredients. Many farmers

19*

146 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

of judgment and experience would not, I apprehend, set this
average much, if any thing, above eight or nine common ox-cart
loads; which would give, probably, one. hundred and fifty, or
one hundred and sixty loads as the aggregate amount that
could be made from a stock consisting of ten heads.

The chief concern with us appears to be with regard to the
quantity of manure. Philosophers, on the other hand, affirm
that, in a practical point of view, more depends upon the qual-
ity than the quantity. Let us not be unmindful of this; and,
however the fact may be, let us always take care to make and
apply only such composts as are adapted to cause abundant
harvests, and to benefit good soils.

Joon E. Howarp, Supervisor.

Statement of Jonathan Howard, 2d.

Ihave measured and composted, since October, A. D. 1852, |
685 loads of manure, as follows, viz.: 580 loads in the barn-
yard, one-fourth from muck, and the remainder of soil from
sides of fences, ditches, and coal-dust, mixed with the drop-
pings of eighteen head of cattle wintered, and sixteen head
kept through the summer, and one horse. In the warm season
the droppings were collected every morning from the yard, and
thrown into the cellar under the barn, which is 38 by 50 feet,
and there intermixed with coal dust and muck, and covered to
prevent evaporation.

Seventy-five loads were made in the hog-yard, where four
swine were wintered and eight summered; and about three-
fourths loam and one-fourth muck, with potato vines and
weeds, formed what was thrown in at different times.

Thirty loads composted as follows: 5 loads muck, 10 loads
scrapings by side of road, 10 loads loam that had received the
wash from a sink spout, and 5 loads from the bottom of an old
hog-yard, and 10 bushels salt. The dimensions of the cart in
which it was measured, are 6} feet long, 33 feet wide, and 20
inches high.

MANURES. 147

Amasa Howard's Statement.

Being interested in the trial for the greatest quantity of ma-
nure, I send the following statement of the manner in ve
mine was made :—

The offal from my slaughter-house, and the manure of four
horses is dropped into a cellar below, where are kept four
hogs. From this cellar I have taken 114 loads of green
manure; 51 loads were made from my barn, where were kept
one yoke of oxen, four cows, and a yearling. From my hog
and barnyard, the former having had the wash of the house,
286 loads, composted with soil and muck, were taken; 88
loads from the various other out-buildines were scraped to-
gether, adding material as required. By this calculation, I find
Ihave made 539 loads, of 40 cubic feet each, during the past
year.

Horace Collamore’s Statement.

Having entered as a competitor for the premium offered by
the Plymouth County Agricultural Society, “to the person
who shall make the greatest quantity of the most valuable
compost manure,” I will state that my stock, the last year, has
averaged about eight head of neat cattle, two horses, and three
swine; that I have a barn cellar, one-third of which is appropri-
ated for a hogsty, and for the repository of the droppings of
the cattle and horses, when housed; and into which is almost
daily thrown swamp mud and soil, onthe dirt, &c., to be mixed
" by the swine.

A large proportion of my farm being sandy, we cart about
200 loads of swamp mud into the barnyard and hog-pen, in the
fall; this receives the droppings of the cattle and swine during
the winter, and, as soon as the frost will permit in the spring,
is frequently ploughed and harrowed, and in June is heaped up
in large winrows, with the scraper, and left to ferment, till
wanted for top-dressing for grass lands or other purposes.

For our low meadow lands we make a compost soil, obtained
from the hedgerows around the fields, intended for our corn

148 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

crops, by ploughing two or three furrows next the fences, and
composting with barn manure.

With a liberal supply of soil and vegetable matter, we make
from our sink and vault about 20 loads of fertilizing manure
yearly.

In addition to these resources, we have, the present year,
made 130 loads of valuable mud compost, as follows :—The
mud was dug and drawn on to the upland last fall; as early
as practicable this spring it was heaped up, and 150 bushels
of leached ashes and seven casks of lime mixed with it; this
was dug over, pulverized, and thoroughly incorporated with
the ashes and lime, during the summer, and used as a top-
dressing for grass on my sandy soils. By this method, and
from these sources, I have made and applied, the present sea-
son, 446 loads of valuable compost manure, of 40 cubic feet per
load.

INDIAN CORN.

Report of the Committee.

Great discredit is often thrown on the statements of indi-
viduals, arising in part, from the unfair mode of measuring.
Many of the committees complain that the entries were so few,
and account for it, by the fact that the premiums offered, are so
small as not to pay for the time and care of measuring the
crop, in compliance with the rules of the society. It would ©
seem that a proper regard to truth, and justice to other parts
of the State, should induce committees to require the utmost
strictness in measurement; and to prevent any discouragement,
that the societies should offer such premiums as will compen-
sate for any amount of time which may be required. The com-
mittee of the Franklin Society, speaking of the excellent crop
of one who entered for a premium, say he “only harvested and
measured the crop from a few rods of his field, and from that
made an estimate of the whole field, which, in the opinion
of the committee was not a compliance with the regulations,

INDIAN CORN. 149

therefore he can’t come in, however good looking.” This is as
it should be; and if all societies would require such a strict-
ness as would secure the confidence of the community, their
returns would be far more valuable. The same committee
speak as follows :—

“Tn conclusion, your committee wish to call the attention of
the community in general, and of the society in particular, to
the fact, that so very few applications are entered for premi-
ums, where so many ought to be; and, especially, to the impor-
tance that those who do make application, should, in every
instance, make their statements in strict accordance with the
regulations of the society, as published in the pamphlet that is
distributed among the members. The amount of land and
quautity of the crops should, in every instance, be clearly and
accurately stated and vouched for, according to the published
regulations. The importance of a strict compliance with these
regulations must be manifest to all. Nothing is, or can be so
embarrassing to a committee, whose duty it is to decide be-
tween the different claimants, as any inaccuracy or want of
precision in the papers before them.

“Your committee therefore unanimously recommend that, in
future, no claim for premium shall be considered unless the
same has been made and filed with the secretary, in strict
compliance with the published rules and regulations of the so-
ciety; and that members and others, making, or intending to
make, entries for premiums, may regard this as necessary from
the outset.”

There is also a fact which has been overlooked in the state-
ments of the amount of corn per acre, ascertained by weight,
which is, that certain varieties shrink more than others, so that
though they may appear to produce more than other varieties,
they may be inferior in weight when thoroughly dried and
measured. The variety of corn should, therefore, be mentioned
in every statement for a premium.

Farther experiments are wanted to ascertain precisely the
difference in shrinkage, of the different varieties of Indian corn.
To show, to some extent, how great this difference may be, a
letter was written to John E. Howard, Esq., supervisor of

150 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

the Plymouth Soeiety, from whom was received the following
reply :—

“Wishing to compare, in respect to shrinkage, the variety of
Indian corn known. in this vicinity as the ‘Whitman corn,’ or
‘smutty white,’ as it is sometimes called,—a kind to which
some farmers here appear to be very partial,—with that
of an cight-rowed yellow which I had raised for a number of
years, I procured for the purpose, some of the former from Mr.
Calvin Leavitt, of Bridgewater. The ears sent me by Mr.
Leavitt were from a crop raised by him, in 1852, for which he
had taken, that year, the first premium; and of which the yield,
as reported by Mr. H. Collamore, then supervisor of the Ply-
mouth County Agricultural Society, was one hundred and
twenty-two bushels to the acre. From the sample received,

(fine looking corn it was,) I shelled, on the 10th January, 1853,
eight quarts, which weighed at that time fourteen pounds and
four ounces, being at the rate of fifty-seven pounds to the
bushel. I also, at the same time, shelled from some ears raised
the same season, and taken from the crib, an equal number of
quarts of the aforesaid yellow,—a handsome, although not, I
presunie, an unusual variety, with large kernels, which, how-
ever, were not so large as were those of the smutty white.
These weighed fifteen pounds and eight ounces, being at the
rate of sixty-two pounds to the bushel.

“'The several parcels were then spread upon the floor of an
upper loft in my corn-house, where they remained securely until
the 21st April following ;—when, on being again weighed, the
smutty white gave twelve pounds and eight ounces, and the
yellow fourteen pounds and twelve ounces. ‘The first having
lost, in weight, from the 10th January to 21st April, one pound
and twelve ounces, being at the rate of seven pounds to the
bushel; and the other, twelve ounces, being at the rate of three
pounds to the bushel.

“The trial, I am sensible, was begun too late in this case, and
conducted upon too limited a scale to prove as satisfactory as
it otherwise might have been. But the facts which appear to
be disclosed seem to deserve attention, and to be of a nature
requiring a further and more thorough investigation of the sub-
ject, going to show, as they do, substantially, that of two crops

INDIAN CORN. 151

of corn of the foregoing varieties, the yellow measuring, on the
first of January, eighty-five bushels, and the smutty white meas-
uring, at the same time, one hundred bushels, the ageregate
weight of the former, at the expiration of the short period of
four months, will be greater than that of the latter. Thus
giving, moreover, probability to the supposition that similar
differences may be found to exist, to a greater extent than is
generally imagined, among other varieties of corn between
which no comparison with reference to the particulars referred
to, has yet been instituted.

“The greater lightness and tendency to shrink of the smutty
white, as above shown, may be, in some measure, or wholly, ac-
counted for, perhaps, from the fact of its being derived, in part,
from the Southern white, to which, I believe, it bears a resem-
blance in the principal features of its organic composition.”

ESSEX.

From the Report of the Committee.

The season having been so favorable for the growth and
maturing of the corn crop, it was with some surprise that the
committee found so few entries of this staple production. In-
deed, we do not remember to have heard so many farmers, as
we have this year, say that their corn crop never was better.
We only wish that more of these crops had been entered for
premium, but the premium of six dollars offered by the society
is hardly large enough to induce farmers to go to all the
trouble of the exact measurement of their land and crop,
required by the rules. We would suggest that larger premi-
ums, and more of-them, be offered to excite a spirit of greater
competition in this direction. Considering the intrinsic value
of this crop, and the many uses to which it is applied, and es-
pecially considering that as large crops are seldom raised as
might easily be raised, the culture of Indian corn should receive
more encouragement.

Francis DopGE, Chairman,

152 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

at

George Hayes’ Statement.

I wish to enter for premium a crop of corn raised by me on
the farm of the late Thomas Bancroft, in Beverly. The land
contained one acre, as measured by a sworn surveyor. It had
been in corn and potatoes the year previously, 1852, but how
manured, I am unable to say, as it was then carried on by
another person; but the land is of good quality. It was
ploughed last spring, and manured in the hill with a compost of
barn and hog manure and sea weed—a good shovelful to the
hill. It was planted about the first of May, and though so
early, the corn came up well, with a good strong growth. It
was cultivated and hoed twice thoroughly, and weeded once
after haying, so that the ground is left entirely free of weeds.
Thorough weeding and stirring of the soil I consider of more
importance to secure a good corn crop than high manuring.
The corn was topped about the middle of September, and
-harvested early in October. It was measured in the ear in
bushel baskets, and found to contain one hundred and forty-four
baskets of sound ears. The corn has lain in the bin ever since,
and this morning two baskets of ears—the same baskets as
were used in measuring before—were shelled and found to
contain sixty-two pounds of shelled corn.

The corn is the eight-rowed corn. It was planted three and
a half feet apart—five stalks left in a hill, and many of the
stalks produced twin ears.

Brvyerty, Nov. 14, 1853.

Hermon P. Chandler’s Statement.

I offer for premium one acre of corn and white beans, from
which I harvested one hundred and forty-six baskets of ears of
corn. Planted in 1852 with corn—yield about seventy bushels
of shelled corn per acre. Ploughedin the fall. It wasmanured
in the spring of 1853; seven cords of compost manure, two-
thirds of it spread and ploughed in, and the remainder put in
the hills. Planted the 20th of May with the golden Sioux corn;
hills three feet eight inches apart each way—four stalks to the
hill. After the corn was up, planted the beans beside each hill

INDIAN CORN. 153

of the corn—yield of beans, five bushels. First of November I
shelled two baskets of ears, which weighed sixty-seven pounds.
Allowing fifty-six pounds to the bushel, it makes eighty-séven
bushels and twenty-one fifty-sixths. Corn was harvested the
first of October. The corn was hoed twice, the ground kept
level as possible. Stalks cut first of September. Amount of
labor, about cighteen days’ work—the value of the land, seventy-
five dollars per acre.

Anpover, Noy. 14, 1853.

Amos Poor, Jr's, Statement.

I present, for examination, one and a quarter acres of corn;
where the corn grew grass was mown in 1851; in 1852 it was
planted with corn and potatoes and was manured in hills. The
present year fifteen cart loads of manure to the acre were
ploughed in, and a small quantity of manure put in the hills;
it was planted four feet between the hills cach way; planted
the 12th of May; hoed three times; harvested about the middle
of October, and yielded two hundred and fifty-seven baskets of
sound corn, weighing forty-five pounds ten ounces to the basket,
making the whole weight on the acre and a quarter, 11,725
pounds.

West Newsury, Dee. 5, 1853.

I hereby certify that I measured a piece of land for Amos
Poor, Jr., which measured two hundred rods, on which he raised
two hundred and fifty-seven baskets of ears of corn the present
year; I also weighed one basket full of ears, which weighed,
exclusive of basket, forty-five pounds ten ounces.

SAMUEL ROGERS.
West Newzury, Noy. 29, 1853.

MIDDLESEX.

Statement of Josiah Bigelow.

The field of corn I offer for premium contains two acres and
twenty-eight rods, is sandy loam, and was in grass in 1851.
Ploughed in the spring of 1852—cizht or nine inches deep,

20*

154 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

a

partly with the Michigan plough, which I prefer—manured
with about twenty loads of compost per acre and harrowed as
well as possible without disturbing the sod—planted about
three feet each way—applied a little guano and bone, mixed
with plaster of Paris, to the hill—but, together with the bad con-
dition of the seed, (smutty white, or, as it is sometimes called,
the Whitman, I believe,) worms and unfavorable weather, the
average was about one kernel to the hill that matured, not-
withstanding it gave a yield far beyond my expectation, of
about thirty-five bushels to the acre. This land for years pre-
vious produced about three-quarters of a ton of hay to the acre.
In the fall of 1852, the land was ploughed about eleven inches
deep, harrowed in the spring of 1855, and forty loads of good
compost manure, made by cattle and hogs, mixed with dry
muck, were spread on the whole field and ploughed in about
six or seven inches deep, harrowed and furrowed about
seven or eight inches deep—running the plough twice in cach
row. By the deep furrowing it allowed the hills to be rather
below the surface, allowing the water from showers to set-
tle about the hills, and also favoring the flat cultivation ;
manured about thirty-five loads of good compost on whole field,
so that the hills would average a little inside of three feet
apart (the rows being three feet three inches distant).
Planted the smutty white corn, (selected from the field of last
year, about three weeks previous to gathering it, by taking
the ears that matured first, and best filled out,) about four and
five kernels to the hill, the second week in May. Run the
plough between rows for the first hoeing, and the cultivator
for the two last. It appeared to suffer very little by the
drought and ripened all of two weeks earlier than last year,
which I think is in consequence of selecting the seed as above
mentioned.

The second field, containing one acre and sixty-eight rods,
mentioned in the annexed report, I did not intend to have
named, as we did not suppose the yield would be equal to the
first, although it was manured quite as well and closer planted,
but it was a yellow corn, very large growth of stock, which I
supposed would be small, consequently it was seeded too
highly, and the result was the greatest profusion of stalks that

INDIAN CORN. . 155

perhaps, was ever witnessed in this neighborhood; and, up to
the first of August, I despaired of having much else; but it came
on very rapidly the last of the season, and matured quite well,
considering the large growth of stalk. As we supposed there
would be less than first field, (of two acres twenty-cicht and
a half rods,) the committee did not take the pains to ascertain
the quantity as they did the first field reported, but cut up and
shelled four square rods in one place according to my desire—
not to take the trouble of going over the field and take sepa-
rate rods as in the other field—but it so happened that I gath-
ered that field first, and to give place in my barn it was husked
and measured, and the result of sound corn two hundred and
seventy-six bushels, beside some thirty bushels of soft corn,
making between one hundred and ninety-three and one hundred
and ninety-four bushels of ears to the acre of sound corn.

You will allow me to say that it was not my intention in
planting this corn to offer for premium, and that I have not
kept any very minute account of all the expenses attending,
but would say, according to the best of my knowledge, that
cost of labor and worth and cost of manure is about the same
in this place as it is in other sections of our county, the same
distance from Boston, say from twenty to thirty miles, and pre-
fer to leave it to others to run out the calculation of profit
or loss, as shall best suit their own ideas, from the items I
have given in this report.
| Groton, 1853.

The undersigned certify that they gathered and measured the
corn grown upon four square rods of land, of a lot which meas-
ures two acres and twenty-eight and a half rods, and found the
yield to be at the rate of one hundred and six bushels per acre.

The undersigned also gathered and measured the corn
erown upon four square rods of land of another lot, which
measures one acre and sixty-eight rods, and found the yield at
the rate of eighty bushels per acre.

Said corn was raised by Josiah Bigelow, Esq., and gathered
on the day of October.

Gro. S. BouTwELL.
J. S. ADAMs.
Wm. SHATTUCK.

156 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

=

WORCESTER WEST.

Statement of George H. Lee.

I hereby certify that I have harvested one hundred and five
bushels of corn, the present season, from one acre of ground.
The manner of culture is as follows:—The green sward was
turned carly in spring, and immediately after about twenty
loads of stable manure were applied per acre, after which it was
harrowed once and thoroughly mixed with the subsoil. The
corn was planted about the 20th of May, in drills. Previous
to weeding, about a table-spoonful of plaster of Paris was ap-
plied to each hill. It was hoed three times; the last time
about the first of August.

Barre, Noy. 7, 1853.

Statement of Nathan S. Walker.

My acre of corn yielded cighty-nine bushels, weighing 61.61 to
the bushel, making 5,484 pounds. The ground was broken up
last November, and I put on thirty loads barn manure, spread
one half upon the top of the furrow, and put the remainder in
the hill. Furrowed one way, three and a half fect apart, and
planted two and a half feet apart in the rows. I used an ox
cultivator to work in the spread manure, and a cultivator be-
tween the rows, and hoed three times.

Barxz, November, 1853.

Statement of Calvin Earl.

The land contained one acre—surveyed by a practical sur.
veyor. In the fall of 1851 the land was turned over from cight
to ten inches in depth. In spring of 1852 it was well manured
and planted with corn, and I had a noble crop. In spring of
1853 I ploughed about fourteen inches deep, and spread on
fifteen to twenty loads barnyard manure, and harrowed well.
After the land was furrowed three and a half fect apart one
way, and two and a half the other, I planted with a small
shovelful of manure in the hill, and hoed twice. .

August 20, cut stover from four rows, ten rods long, which

INDIAN CORN. 157

weighed 273 pounds, equal to 5,080 pounds in the whole.
September 3, cut stalks on four rows, which weighed 353, equal
to 6,530 in the whole, green. October 20, harvested the corn,
which measured one hundred and eighty-four and a half bushels
of ears, equal to ninety-two and a quarter bushels shelled corn,
which weighed 6,646 pounds. The husks from four rows
weighed two hundred and six pounds, equal to 3,811 pounds, in
the whole, weighed dry.

Recapitulation :—
921 bushels corn, weighed 6,646 lbs.,at 95 cents, $87 64
3,811 lbs. husks, $5 per ton, . : : : A 9 53

5,050 “ stover,$5 “ ; - : d : 12 62
G@s00 “ stalks,$5 “ ; : : : : 16 32

$126 11
Huszsarpston, Noy. 29, 1853.

WORCESTER NORTH.

Joel Hayward’s Statement.

The land on which my corn was raised was planted with
potatocs last year. Last spring fourteen loads of green manure
were spread and ploughed in, and thirteen loads of compost put
in the hill. The corn was planted May 3d. Corn, Tuscan
white.

27 loads manure, . * ; : esr is . $27 00

Ploughing, , : ; : ’ : - 2 00
Teaming and A ean manure, . : : . 2 00
"Planting, : : : : ‘ 3 : : 4 00
Hoeing, : ; : , ; é a ’ 6 00

$41 00

This field had twenty and one-third hills to the square rod,
the ears weighing 46} lbs. to the rod, making ninety bushels to
the acre.

ASHBY,

158 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

&

Daniel Works’ Statement.

The land on which my corn was raised was part sowed and
part planted last year. Last spring twenty loads of green
manure and ten loads of compost were spread and ploughed in.
No manure was put in the hill. Corn hoed but twice.

30 loads of manure, . : ; : : : $30 00

Ploughing, . : : 4 ‘ . ; : 2 00
Spreading manure, : E : : 3 : 3 50
Furrowing and planting, ; 5 5 : i 2 83
Hoeing, : : : : ; i : 5 T 00

$45 33

This field had 323 hills to the rod, the ears weighing 444
Ibs., making eighty-six bushels to the aere.

HAMPSHIRE, FRANKLIN AND HAMPDEN.
Statement of George Dickinson.

The piece of land on which the corn was raised, contains
four acres and ninety rods, and yielded two hundred and ninety-
seven bushels and fifteen quarts of shelled corn; weighing
fifty-four and a half pounds to the bushel, or sixty-three bush-
els and five-ninths per acre, weighing fifty-six pounds to the
bushel.

The land is first quality meadow land—a deep, heavy loam—
and previous to 1852, most of it had lain in grass for eight
years, producing two crops each year, without any top-dressing. |
In the spring of 1852, it was ploughed to the depth of eight
or nine inches, and manure applied. It was planted then to
broomcorn. The manure was put into the hole, at the rate of
nine loads to the acre. This crop yielded about seven hundred
pounds brush to the acre, and a fair crop of seed.

In the spring of 1853, the land was ploughed about eight
inches deep, twelve loads of manure to the acre, spread on
and harrowed in, and planted the last days of May. It is esti-
mated that the crows pulled, on the whole piece, nearly a quar-
ter of an acre.

INDIAN CORN. 159

The corn was cut up and stacked the third week in Septem-
ber, and husked in October, and the account stands as follows:

Dr.
Team and hand labor, : : A : $87 75
54 loads manure, . : : : : 54 00
Interest on land, . : : : : 54 00
Taxes, . : : : ; : - 5 00
—_§ $200 5
Cr.
By 2974 bushels corn at 80 cents, . . $238 00
Corn fodder, . : : : ; : 27 00
————$265 00
Net, : 3 : : : : : . $64 25

Hapiry, November 14, 1853.

HAMPSHIRE.
Statement of N. & B. Sinith.

The piece of corn we offer for premium, contains one acre
and five rods. It was mowed three years previous to 1853,
and not manured during that time. In December, 1852, it was
ploughed with the Michigan plough, eight inches deep. A com-
post was made upon the lot—containing about twenty loads of
clear manure and thirty bushels of oyster-shell lime, slacked in
a brine made from two bushels of salt. This compost was
spread upon the furrows and harrowed in. The corn was
planted by a corn-planter, on the 14th of May. Ten bushels
of shell lime and ashes were dropped by a machine. The corn
was hoed three times, and grass seed was sowed at the third
hoeing. On the tenth of September, we harvested the crop.

Value of crop :—
98 bushels, 22 quarts, at 92 cents, : . $90 80
4 baskets soft corn, . : : : : 1 00

3 tons of fodder, at $5, 0
$106 80

160 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

A

Expenses :—
20 loads of manure, . ; ‘ é - $20 00

30 bushels of lime and 2 of salt, a 15
Ploughing, hauling manure, &., . - , 8 00
Spreading manure and harrowing, : ? 2 00
Planting and seed, : - : : 1 00
Hoeing and cultivating, : : : 2 10st
Cutting and stacking, . : ; : : 3 00
Carting and husking, . : : ; : 8 00
Interest on land, ; : : ; : 6 00

$61 15

Net gain, . : : : : A : $45 05

SunpreRLAND, November 15, 1853.

Statement of R. T. Wheelock.

The acre, on which my crop of Indian corn was raised, is part
of a field of three and three-fourths acres, in Amherst. This field
is a hard, stiff, loamy soil, resting on a subsoil of gravel, with
a sprinkling of cobble-stones. It has been pastured. About
six years previous to my laying it down to pasture, it had been
apparently exhausted, by cropping, of every article of food,
capable of nourishing plants. In 1841-2, I attempted to culti-
vate this lot, and the result was nearly a total failure. So
lifeless was the soil, after turning it with the plough, that
neither sunshine, rain, nor good cultivation, seemed to pulver-
ize it, or to render it capable of sustaining a poor crop. Two
methods of procedure suggested themselves to my mind; either
to manure liberally and continue to cultivate, or to stock it
down to pasture fora fewyears. The latter course, I adopted.
[ sowed it with rye and stocked it down. The seed took re-
markably well, and, judging from the appearance of the pas-
ture, from year to year, I thought it gave unmistakable signs
of improvement. Last spring, I concluded to make one more
trial. About the first of May, I commenced ploughing it from |
six to seven inches deep; and, to my surprise, I found a thick,
rich, heavy turf. On working this, it pulverized immediately
after coming in contact with the atmosphere. I harrowed the
land twice, manured in the hill, at the rate of eight loads to

INDIAN CORN. 161

the acre, using a compost, one-half from the barnyard, the other
half from the slaughter-house. I hoed three times, and ashed
one-half of the field after the first hoeing. The corn was cut
and stacked, about the middle of September, and husked, the
last of October. The yield was one hundred and twenty-five
bushels of ears, equal to sixty-two and one-half bushels of
shelled corn. The whole field yielded three hundred and
seventy-one bushels of ears. I think there was a loss of from
five to eight bushels per acre, in consequence of an east wind,
about the last of July, which prostrated it flat upon the ground.

Value of crop :—

625 bushels, at 83 cents, . , é » Sok 87
1; tons of corn fodder at $5, . ; ; T 50

$59 37
Expenses :—

Ploughing, . ‘ ‘ ‘ : oie Bel io
Manure, and Janenanti it, : ; : 9 00
Planting, . é : : : - ; 1 50;
Hoeing, : : , : : F 3 00:
Seed, : : : : : ? 25
Cutting and nite ‘ 2 00
Husking, ‘ ? 5 ‘ : 3. 75
Drawing to the ch : : ; : , 1 00
Interest on land, 4 50
Ashes and ashing, 1 00

$29 ‘15

Net gain, . F : 2 : of : $29 62

AmuERST, November 17, 1853.

HAMPDEN.

Report of the Committee.

The committee remark that the cultivation of corn is a sub-
ject in which every farmer is most deeply interested; it is like
iron among the metals, the most common and still:'the most im-
portant; it will be seen by the official report of the Patent
Office, 1851-2, that the aggregate of this crop is more than

21*

162 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

five times that of wheat; see the figures used :—100,479,150
bushels wheat, and 592,141,230 of corn; of which Massachu-
setts gives but 31,221 of wheat, and 2,345,490 of corn. These
figures suggest material for many remarks which might be
offered, but we leave them, with all their importance, to the
consideration of those who think for themselves. In present-
ing the statement of our only competitor on this crop, we may
be permitted to remark, that, having a personal acquaintance
with him and his accuracy in all the details of his agricultural
pursuits, we derive much pleasure in presenting his successful
results to the public, through our medium, and earnestly do we
indulge the hope that his statement will stimulate many to
excel him in the field of his success.

J. C. Parsons’ Statement.

I wish to offer for premium the corn which I have raised this
season, upon sixteen acres of land. Four acres of this was
planted to corn last year, and for which I received a premium
from your society; the rest of it had been in grass for three
years, and produced about two tons of hay to the acre. In
May last, two hundred and fifty-four loads of stable manure,
equal to one hundred and twenty-seven cords, was spread upon
this land and ploughed under. It was also manured in the hill
with compost, made from hog manure, muck, ashes, and sizing,
and planted three and a half feet apart each way. It was culti-
vated and hoed three times, and, after the first hoeing, it had a
handful upon each hill of ashes, plaster and hen manure mixed.

The yield was 2,512 bushels of ears, equal to 1,256 bushels
of shelled corn, or 78 bushels to the acre. I have weighed
and shelled one basket of the corn, (one and a half bushels,)
which weighed as follows :—corn, fifty-one pounds; cobs, six-
teen pounds; both, sixty-seven pounds; one-half bushel of
shelled corn weighed thirty pounds.

I estimate the cost and value of the crop as follows :—
1,256 bushels corn, at 90 cents,. . $1,130 40

Corn fodder, at $10 per acre, . ; 160 00
————$1,290 40

INDIAN CORN. 163

~ Cost of 254 loads manure, at $1.50, . $381 00

“ compost, ashes, &c., : 4 75 00
- cultivating and harvesting, . 225 00
« interest on value of land, ; 100 00
$781 00
Balance in favor of crop, . ‘ . ‘ - $509 40

Agawam, November 23, 1853.

BERKSHIRE.

From the Report of the Committee.

Your committee are not alone in believing that in no season
since Berkshire ceased to be the hunting ground of the red
man, have her fields presented a state of so high and judicious
culture, or returned to their owners so large a remuneration
for their cares and their toils. “Old and worn-out soils,”
“degenerated and fruitless soils,’ “inhospitable skies and
sterile grounds,” are epithets which may do for poetic figures,
to grace a stump speech or Fourth of July oration; but the
crops shown to us, in our survey of the county, have taught us
that this language belongs not to those farmers with whom we
have had intercourse, or the grounds which they occupy. If it
is true in reference to those who are not active members of
this society, our language to them would be, come with us,
adopt the modes of culture which the observation and experi-
ence of the age has shown to be judicious, and the same skies
and the same fruitful fields shall be yours.

To the same class of “poetic figures” would we assign the
languaze we often hear, that little has been done for the pro-
motion of azriculture ; that while every thing else has advanced
with rapid motion, agriculture has remained comparatively sta-
tionary. Now when you place the reaping machine by the
sickle; the threshing machine by the flail; the plough of to-day,
with that of former years; the cultivator and harrow with plate
steel teeth, by the old drag and bush; the beautiful, light, elas-
tic two, four, six, eight, ten and twelve-tined fork of a Partridge,
with the old bug horn; the barn and barnyards, the stables
and sheds of a Leavitt, a Harrison, a Colt, a Joiner, and many

164 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

a

others in this county, with the things of the same name, once
the best of the class; the tenants of these yards, stables and
sheds, with their ancestors; the hog-pens and their five hundred
pound Suffolks, with the swordfish-nosed street scavenger of
olden times; the French, Spanish or Silesian merino, giving
more wool from his necklace and pantalets than flocks used to
give from the entire animal; the tillage of the soil and the
crops produced by this tillage, under the direction of the farmer
of the age, in comparison with those of other years; and last,
but by no means least, when you place the mind, the enlight-
ened, faithful, working mind, now devoted to the object, and
acting through the agricultural journals, the addresses and lec-
tures, the application of science to agriculture in the school and
in the field; mind, investigating mind, pointing out the laws
of vegetable life and vegetable growth, showing the food best
fitted for that growth, and establishing the law of rotation for
crops in accordance with the law of growth, the mind thus de-
voted to the advancement of our cause, (and devoted mind is
the surest criterion of progress the world has yet discovered,)
in contrast with the mind thus devoted, only a quarter of a
century ago; you will have the evidence of the progress made.
In the face of all the taunts at the snail-like pace with which
agricultural improvement is said to have advanced, we chal-
lenge the world to produce an equally rapid advancement in
any other department of life’s duties.

So great has been the change in the amount of an acre’s
production, that we have been cautioned repeatedly against
reporting the full measure, lest we bring distrust on all our do-
ings. But here permit us to say, we have made no estimates.
We have examined hundreds of crops in the field, we have ex-
amined them thoroughly, honestly and faithfully, we have taken
into account the soil, the location, the tillage, the present crop
in comprison with that of the last year, and the prospects for
the future. In the corn-field, we have measured one rod care-
fully and accurately; so measured it that the adjoining rod on
either side should be as large and contain as many hills as the
one taken, and so measured it that it would require one hun-
dred and sixty such rods for an acre. We have designed to
take it, not from a manure heap, but a fair specimen of the bet-

INDIAN CORN. 165

ter part of the piece, and in comparing different pieces, to give,
of course, evenness due consideration.

We have picked this rod, husked it handsomely and weighed
it accurately, as truly so as if we were selling or buying. How
much this corn would shrink, how much any grain or roots will
shrink between harvest and the other side of a cold winter is
not given us to decide. For ourselves, we believe the shrink-
age is twice as great as is generally supposed, but this is not
the question. That it will shrink, every person ought to know,
and they are at liberty to make any allowance deemed just. In
grain we made no measurement. Some results were reported
to us after our awards were made, by men in whom the world
put full confidence on all other subjects; why should they not
on this?

Of the three-acre pieces of corn, that of Mr. Sears, of Lenox,
was eight-rowed and very dry; forty-two hills to the rod, yield-
ing sixty pounds. The ground of Mr. Belden, of Lenox, was
sward land, ploughed in the fall; twenty-five loads of compost.
two parts muck and one manure, harrowed in; thirty-five hills
to the rod and fifty-six pounds.

Of the one-acre pieces there were thirty-four entries.

Mr. Shepardson, of Lanesboro’, showed us corn ground thor-
oughly tilled and heavily manured. Twelve-rowed corn, planted
closely. The rod gave seventy-eight pounds.

The ground of Mr. Hinkley, of Lee, was ploughed once last
year, received fifteen loads of long manure and gave forty
bushels of corn. This season twenty loads of long manure were
plouzhed in seven inches, and fifteen loads of compost harrowed
in; four bushels of ashes and plaster applied to the field after
first hoeing; corn, twelve-rowed, white and yellow mixed, plant-
ed 18th and 19th of May, four kernels in hill, hills three feet
by two and one-half, and cultivated twice and hoed twice, hills
raised very little. The rod gave sixty-nine pounds.

The ground of Mr. Smith, of Lee, was sward; forty ox-cart
loads of manure from the barnyards and pig-pen were ploughed
in, eight inches deep, in April, harrowed thoroughly. Planted,
14th of May, with Vermont Dutton corn, hills three feet by
two and a half, and cultivated, four stalks left in a hill; hoed
three times, raising hills but very little. A handful of a mixture,

166 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

nine parts ashes and one plaster, was put in hills, and a small
amount of ashes and plaster applied after first hoeine—seventy-
one pounds to the rod.

The fields of Mr. Hinkley and Mr. Smith were neighbors in
more senses than one, and very close competitors, giving each
' very heavy crops, but it was thought that the entire acre of
Mr. Hinkley would carry the most dry corn to the mill.

It would give us pleasure to have the men who talk so learn-
edly of the ignorance of the farmer, and the go-to-mill-with-a-
stone-in-one-end-of-the-bag manner of conducting his business,
examine both the farms and the farmers between the railroad
at Lee and Stockbridge Plain. We do not say there are not
better places in the county, of four miles in extent, but we
would rest the question on this ground.

The corn of Mr. Chamberlain, of Williamstown, was among
the slate hills of the Taconic range, a little more than a stone’s
throw from Vermont, on an old sheep pasture, planted without
manure—s3ixteen acres in all, affording a difference in soil and
crop. We picked a rod of thirty hills, twelve-rowed corn, sixty-
four pounds.

John L. Cooper, of Sheffield, about as near Connecticut ag
the last crop to Vermont, exhibited a piece of some fiftcen acres,
no manure ever on the lot. Seed soaked in boiling water, one
pint of soft soap to half a bushel of seed, (the crop did not soft
soap the owner,) rolled in plaster and planted the 20th of
May. It was a heavy crop of very good corn. The committee
regretted in this crop, as in several others, the want of a few
more spoons.

J. Hf. Rowley, of Egremont, presented some twenty-five acres
of good corn on hill lands inaccessible to the manure cart.

Ten of the fields of corn examined gave sixty pounds or
more to the rod, and but six of all the entries fell below fifty
pounds.

STEPHEN REED, Chairman.

INDIAN CORN. 167

HOUSATONIC.

From the Report of the Committee.

We have measured and weighed accurately every man’s corn.
In our decision we have been governed principally by the
weight, cighty pounds of ears we call a bushel, which is the
standard, as adopted by the State Board of Agriculture.

The first premium for the best acre of corn we give to Henry
D. Palmer, of Stockbridge. Statement: Mowed last year,
ploughed this spring, thirty-three hills on the rod, manured
in the hill, planted 19th of May, soil gravelly loam, yield 1382
bushels to the acre.

The second premium for the second best acre we award to
Henry Smith, of Lee. Statement: Meadow last year, manure
spread on and ploughed in this spring, thirty-nine hills on the
rod, ashes and plaster equal quantities, a handful put in the hill,
planted about the 12th of May, soil sandy loam, yield 123
bushels to the acre.

The third premium for the third best acre we give to Emmons
Arnold, of New Marlborough. Mr Arnold’s statement we have
not: twenty-eight hills on the rod, yield 117 bushels on the acre.

The fourth premium for the fourth best acre we award to
Lebbeus M. Pixley, of Great Barrington. Statement: Mowed
last year, ploughed last fall, manure spread on and ploughed in,
and manured in the hill, twenty-eight hills on the rod, planted
15th of May, soil loam, yield 112} bushels to the acre.

The fifth premium we award to Joseph Wilcox, of Sheffield.
Statement: Pasture last year, manure spread on and ploughed
in this spring, a handful of ashes, plaster and hen manure in the
hill, thirty-two hills on the rod, planted 20th and 21st May,
soil sandy loam, yield 1063 bushels on the acre.

The sixth premium we give to Eliada Peck, of Sheffield.
Statement: Clover pasture last year, ploughed this spring,
manured in the hill, seed put in scalding water, rolled in soft
soap and then plaster, planted 21st and 22d May, twenty-five
hills on the rod, soil loam, yield 103} bushels to the acre.

To Hugo Dewey, of Alford, for the best piece of four acres
of corn we award an extra premium. Statement: Pasture last

168 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

a

year, ploughed and manure spread on the furrow, ashes and
plaster in the hill, planted 17th May, thirty-seven hills on the
rod, soil gravelly loam, yield 112 bushels to the acre.

To Orrin Curtis, of Great Barrington, for the second best
piece of four acres of corn, we award an extra premium.
Statement: Corn last year, ploughed deep and manured in the
hill from the distillery, planted the first week in May, ripe and
harvested the 10th of September, forty-eight hills on the rod,
Tillotson corn, soil dark loam, some clay and muck, yield 105
bushels on the acre.

S. H. BusHneti, Chairman.

NORFOLK.

From the Report of the Committee.

The subjoined papers are submitted with much satisfaction,
affording, as they do, gratifying evidence not only of the in-
creasing interest and skill of the farmers of Norfolk County
in the cultivation of grain, but also of the feasibility of our
soils for this purpose, and of the large profits resulting from
these experiments.

J. P. Jones, Chairman,

Statement of Luther Gilbert.

The field of corn entered by me for premium, contains two
acres; the soilis a black loam generally, and part of it mix-
ture of gravel. The condition of the field was poor; it was
sowed down to grass in the fall of 1846, without any manure;
it has been in grass ever since, until September, 1852, when I
had it broke up about ten inches deep. The manure used on this
field was a compost made entirely, between the 18th of No-
vember, 1852, and the last of April, 1853, from one horse, one
cow, and sods taken from the above field and composted in
my barn cellar by my hogs. As the bulk of the manure was
taken from the same field to which it was returned, I shall only
estimate the value of the horse and cow manure, the use of
the hogs for composting, and the carting the sods into the cel-
lar, as that was the only cost to me. The compost was carted

INDIAN CORN, | 169

directly from the barn cellar,—without turning over,—about
the last of April, and spread as even over the whole field as it
could well be, an! immediately ploughed in. The quantity
spread in this way, was about sixteen cords to the field,—or
eight cords to the acre ;—it' was then harrowed and furrowed
both ways, three feet four inches one way, three feet the other.
There were about two cords of ‘scrapings of the cellar put in
the hill; on such parts of the field as the soil: was poorest, one
shovelful in the hill. On. the 10th and 11th of May,.I planted
it with the Plymouth County corn, putting six to, eight kernels
to each hill; cultivated and hoed it twice, taking out all but
five, and sometimes four, stalks at hoeing time.

On the 18th of October, the society’s committee, after
examining the whole field, selected two places, in separate
parts of the field, and measured one square_rod in each, which
the committee considered to be a fair average of the whole.
They measured from the centre between two rows, and gath-
ered, shelled, and weighed each rod separately: the first rod
weighed 44} pounds; the second, 46g pounds; making the
average, 45, pounds to the rod; reckoning 56 pounds to the
bushel, as per rule of ‘he society, and it gives me 129, bush-
els to the acre. The corn was well ripened, and I com-
menced. on the same day to harvest it. |

Debt and credit on the above field :—

Land valued by the assessors at $225 per acre,

interest on ditto, . : : a eon
Taxes on the same, this year, : : Re ae
Ploughing in September, 1852, . s es M00)
Carting sods into barn cellar for hogs, at sun-

dry times, : - OOO
Manure of horse and cow, 53 Peniie : Se OD
Use of hogs to work over sods and composting, 10 00
Applying manure, $10; ploughing, harrowing,

and furrowing, $6, . . eyes . 16 00
Seed corn and planting, $3.50 ; cultivating and

hoeing, $6, ; : : - oe. 60
Curae stalks and pe : : . 16 00

$104 06
22%

170 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

a

Value of crop :—

Stalks and husks, A : . $30 00
258+ bushels shelled corn, at 90 iets 2 Bae “20
Increased value of land, benefited by manure, 14 00
$2716 20
$172 14

GRANTVILLE, NEEDHAM, Noy. 11, 1853.

Statement of J. R. Dow.

The one and five-eighths acres of land which I offer for pre-
mium, were broken up and planted to corn in 1852, and then
manured with five cords of piggery manure to the acre. In
1853, the same land was treated in precisely the same way. I
finished planting 8th of June, as follows :—

25 rows were planted 18 inches apart both ways.
50 “ 94. bc “ “
50 “ “ 30 “ “ “

And the result was as follows :—

336 baskets of sound merchantable corn.
20 6“ “ very good pig corn.
ys pig

356 baskets.

Equal to one hundred and nine bushels shelled corn to the acre.
Twenty baskets were shelled and weighed, which yielded ten
bushels, or five bags, each weighing one hundred and eleven
and three-quarter pounds to the bag. The corn planted
twenty-four inches apart yielded the best. After having tried
the experiment of close planting, I have come to the conclusion
to plant in future twenty-four inches apart, feeling satisfied I
have the best crop and the largest yield when my land is ma-
nured as above. The land is a moist, loamy soil, originally
very rocky.
Estimated cost and expenses :—

Piggery manure, . j f ; . $48 75
Ploughing, harrowing and spreading manure, 15 00
Furrowing and planting, : : : ; 8 00
Cultivating and hoeing, ’ : eee S08

INDIAN CORN. by

Cutting stalks and harvesting, . : . $14 00

Tashan ; 90
Interest on the iki of the faci sa $150 per
acre, at 6 per cent., is ; ; ‘ 6 (AO
$103 36

Value of the crop :—
356 baskets, or 178 bushels, at $1 per bushel, $178 00

Stalks and husks, 3 5 : oe OO
213 00
Proms. : , f $109 64

Or at the rate of $67. 45 per acre.

Annexed is a certificate of the land, as surveyed by Charles
Breck, Esq., Surveyor.

Mitton, November 10, 1853.

Mitton, November 3, 1853.
This certifies that I have measured the piece. of land on which
the corn of Mr. J. R. Dow grew, and found it to contain one
acre, two roods, twenty rods.
CHARLES Breck, Surveyor.

P. Ruggles’ Statement.

The land on which the corn was raised was planted in 1852,
one-third with corn. and two-thirds with potatoes, and was ma-
nured about the same as the present year. The soil is a good
loam, and has been cultivated many years. This spring it was
ploughed with a horse, after spreading about three-fifths of the
manure, the other two-fifths being put in the drills on which the
corn was planted, one kernel ina place on each side of the
drill, in a zig-zag form, about six inches apart. The drills were
from two and a half to three feet apart. The suckers, of which
there were a great many, were cut soon after the corn was silked
out, in order to let in the sun, the drills running nearly north
and south. I supposed, in the spring, that I had planted one
acre, but, by actual measurement, there was but one hundred
and thirty-three rods. The produce was one hundred and

172 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

forty-seven’ baskets of ears, yiclding, by estimated measure
ninety-seven bushels and nineteen quarts, or about one hundred
and eizhtcen bushels per acre. The corn was planted about
the 15th of May, and was of the kind called Plymouth County,
or smutty white. One-third of the field was moist ,land, and
yielded much, better than the other part.
Estimated é¢ost of said crop :—

Five cords barnyard manure, at $6 per cord, $30 00
Carting out and spreading,
Ploughing the ground twice with home
Two days’ planting, ae
Ploughing and hoeing twice, fond day 5;
Cutting suckers, two days,

“ stalks, 6“ “

“ up but stalks,
Husking corn, 4 days,

ma Om bhp Ww eS & ew Ww
= ;
oO

Interest on land, at’ $200 per acre, 10 50
Taxes, about : : nA : 00
Value of seed, . bane tis : Z t 75

P ——— $71 25
Value of the crop:— © }
97 bushels and 19 quarts corn, at $1 per bushel, $97 59
Suckers and top stalks, 2 tons, 4 ‘ 20 00°
Buts and husks,.2 tons, . ; ow) Bett 990 400

127+59

Net profit. on 133 rods, é i } # ge 856-434
Mitton, November #10, 1853. .
This certifies that I measured the land on which'the corn of
Mr. P. Ruggles grew, and found that it contained 133 rods.
i CHARLES Breck, Surveyor.
Miton, October 27, 1853, “
Report of Special Committee on Mr. Ruggles’ Crop of Corn.
The committee appointed at a meeting of the trustees of the
Norfolk Agricultural Society, on the 17th of November last,
report: That, in, pursuance of that appointment, they, have
visited the farm cultivated by Mr. Philemon Ruggles, in Milton,

INDIAN CORN. 173

for the putpose of ascertaining the accuracy of the statement
made by him respecting his crop of corn.

The field measures 133 rods, from which 147 baskets of
corn, on the ear, were gathered, measuring, when shelled, 2051,
quarts per basket, and weighing 37 lbs., making 5,439 lbs.,
which, divided by 56 lbs., the society’s standard for the bushel,
gives 97 bushels, equal to 117 bushels to the acre.

As apart of this corn had already been removed, the com-
mittee could not strictly verify Mr. Ruggles’ account of the
number ofsbaskets brought from the field. They have, however,
no reason to doubt its, accuracy; and it is substantially cor-
roborated by Mr. Breck’s admeasurement of the bin soon after
the corn was placed there. Tuomas Movt.ey.

* CHEEVER NEWHALL.
: December 8, 1853.

Mitton, November 12, 1853.
To J. P. Jones, E'sq., Chairman, Sc.

Inclosed you will receive the statement of B. F. Dudley, on
rye, aid those of J. R. Dow and P. Ruggles, on corn, and as you
requested me, being in the neighborhood, to examine them, and
communicate what information I could obtain respecting them,
I submit the following :—The land on which Mr. Dudley’s rye
was raised, as he states, was called worn-out plain, and fifty
dollars per acre would have been called a high price for it for
cultivation. It has. been mostly used for pasture for many
years, although sometimes cultivated, but never, to my knowl-
edeve, with much success until the present year. As you will
perceive by his statement, it was not a selected part of his
field that ‘was taken to estimate from, but the whole taken
together; and, as I often examined the field, I think it would
have been difficult to have sclected one acre better than the
rest, as it was very even, and all good. After the grain was
harvested, and the quantity reported, I measured the ground, and
found it to contain two acres, three roods, seven rods, as given
in his statement, which, as I reckoned it, is at the rate of 473
bushels per acre. The rye, after reaping, was stooked in the
field for some time, and then carted near to the barn and stacked
out for some weeks, then taken‘into the barn and threshed, and:

174 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

must have lost several bushels in moving, which would have
been saved had it been carried directly from the field into the
barn, and have made the crop near or quite fifty bushels per
acre, making a clear gain of about $48 per acre—a sum suffi-
cient to have bought the land a few years ago, and which, in
many parts of the county, would now buy land equally as good,
and in some much better.

Mr. Ruggles supposed, at the time of planting in the spring,
that he had an acre of land, and entered it for a premium ac-
cordingly. Subsequent measure, however, proved that there
was but one hundred and thirty-three rods. I visited the field
several times, and, as the land was strong and well manured, the
eorn grew rapidly and threw up a large quantity of suckers,’
which, as he states, were cut to let in the sun, of which there
was some need, as the field was a perfect swamp. The prac-
tice of cutting the suckers is objected to by some cultivators,
as injurious to the crop. In this case the suckers and top
stalks were both cut, whether to its injury or benefit is not
known; one thing, however, is certain, there was an extraordi-
nary large crop. The field, by measurement, contained one
hundred and thirty-three rods, from which there were harvested
one hundred and forty-seven baskets of corn on the ear. On the
27th of October, I went to Mr. Rugeles’ place, and helped him
shell two baskets of ears of the corn, and found it to yield
forty-two and one-half quarts of shelled corn, or ninety-seven
nineteen thirty-seconds bushels on the one hundred and thirty-
three rods. As there has been dispute about so large a crop.
of corn being raised in our county, I have been very particular:
about the measure, although I had no doubt of Mr. Ruggles’
honesty in the statement, yet, to satisfy myself as well as the
public, I measured the eorn, which was put up in a regular bin,
and found that there were two hundred and twenty-six cubie feet
of ears, which—according to my figuring, and allowing 2,747.70
eubic inches to the heaped bushel, which, I believe, is the stand-
ard, being five hundred and ninety-seven and twenty-cight
hundredths inches more than a level bushel—would give one
hundred and forty-two baskets of ears; and, as it would pack
much eloser in a large bin than baskets, I think there could
have been no mistake about the measure or quantity. I should

INDIAN CORN. 175

have stated that the cobs from the two baskets of ears weighed
but fifteen and one-half pounds. The great superiority of this
kind of corn consists in the extra quantity which a basket of
ears will yield, being in this case twenty-one and one-quarter
quarts; and, should it prove to contain as much nutriment as
the yellow kind, it will be a valuable acquisition to the farmer.
The corn-field of Mr. Dow I also examined and surveyed, as
my certificate will show. It was indeed an uncommon field to
‘look at; and the result proved that it was equal to the promise.
The soil was naturally rather moist, and originally very rocky,
and many rocks are now in the land, large enough to occupy
the space of several hills each, although no deduction was made
on account of them in the measure of the land. This field also
was surveyed after the corn was harvested, and the result
reported to me; the produce of the whole field is also given,
instead of taking one rod and measuring that, as has sometimes
‘been done, giving an opportunity to say, that the best rod of
the field was selected for trial. This field,as you will perccive,
produced more baskets of ears to the acre than Mr. Ruggles’
field; and had it yielded as much to the basket as that, would
have produced over thirty bushels more to the acre; and, as
there appears no reason why an ear of corn with a small cob
may not be raised as easily as one with a large one, if the corn
should prove as valuable, the difference in the yield would pay
nearly the cost of cultivation—an object certainly worth the
consideration of farmers. Respectfully yours,

CHARLES BRECK.

Thomas Motley, Jr.’s, Statement.

The following statement by Thomas Motley, Jr., Esq., of
West Roxbury, shows that another remarkable crop of corn has
been raised this year in Norfolk County :-—

Quantity of corn produced from 3 ;%1%, acres of land, in
West Roxbury, year 1853:—

514 baskets, by average of 20 baskets shelled

and measured, gives, by sealed measure,

of good mealing corn, . : : . 85 bushels.
Pig corn, . ‘ : 5 : 5 men

_

95 “ per acre.

176 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

514 baskets, by weight 56 Ibs. to bushel,
good mealing corn, -. 4 < - 95 bushels.
Pig corn, . : : . . , oie

108° “per aere.

The land was surveyed November 28, 1853, by W. A. Gar-
bett, land surveyor.

Statement of Isaac H. Meserve, Superintendent Roxbury
Almshouse.

The acre of corn which I offer for a premium, was raised on
light, loamy soil; it was pasture land in 1852; I ploughed it
the last of September of that year, eight inches deep; last
spring I spread about six cords of green barn manure, night
soil, and meadow mud, well mixed: then ploughed from ten to
twelve inches deep, harrowed it, then ploughed four inches deep,
harrowed again, and planted with one shovelful of compost of
hog manure and meadow mud in each hill; the rows three feet
apart and the hills two and a half; the corn was the twelve-
rowed kind, with four kernels ina hill. I planted the 17th of
May; cut the stalks the 8th of September; and harvested the
19th of October. I cultivated once and hoed three times ; after
the first hoeing, I put around the corn two hundred and fifty
pounds of guano.

Expenses :—
Ten cords manure, at $4, : : 4 . $40 00
Ploughing and harrowing, . , : oy HBO
Furrowing and planting, : ; : oye 00
Hoeing, &e., . : : ‘ - F ‘25: 00
Cutting stalks, and harvesting, . : «ye
Interest on land, . : : : : =» yah
Guano, . é ; ; : : ‘ puthial ped
$78 50
Value of crop :—
Stalks, . : : $15 00

One hundred and five bushels corn, ; . 105 00
One half the manure unexpended, . : . 225°

Leaves net profit of : : : ; - $65 25

INDIAN CORN. 177

The ground was measured by James Ritchie, Hsq.; the corn
was measured by Mr. James M. Wentworth; there were one
hundred and five baskets; one basket he shelled, and it meas-
ured thirty-two quarts. The most of the work was done by
the inmates belonging to the institution; but I have charged
for their labor, what I think it would cost.

I hereby certify, that on the 19th of October past, I harvested
and measured one acre of corn, raised on Brook Farm this
year: it produced one hundred and five baskets; I shelled one
basket, and it measured thirty-two quarts, making one hundred
and five bushels of shelled corn.

JAMES M. WENTWORTH.

Broox Farm, November 12, 1853.

I hereby certify that I have, this day, measured one acre of
land, on which corn was this season raised, for I. H. Meserve,
Esq., at Brook Farm.

James Ritcutn, Surveyor.

West Roxznury, October 19, 1853.

Statement of Benjamin N. Sawin.

The two acres of corn entered by me for premium were raised
on land of a sandy loam, and have been improved as a pasture
the last eighteen years, without any cultivation. In May, 1852,
the land was ploughed six inches deep, and harrowed, and
planted with corn. I put upon the two acres nine cords of
unfermented manure from my barn cellar. In applying the
manure, (for an experiment,) on one acre, I spread four and a
half cords and harrowed it in, put none in the hill; on the next
acre I applied the same quantity and quality of manure in the
hill, and spread none. In May, 1853, I ploughed the ground
eight inches deep. On one acre, (the same that was spread on
last year,) I spread and ploughed in four and a half cords of
unfermented manure, put none in the hill, and furrowed with a
horse-plough, making the hills two feet ten inches apart cach
way; onthe next acre I applicd the same quantity and quality
of manure in hill, and spread none. The corn was planted the
20th and 21st days of May, putting four or five kernels in the

23*

178 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

hill; a cultivator was used between the rows, and hoed twice;
harvested the 20th of October. Two rods (one on each acre)
were selected, which were considered a fair sample of the field.
On the acre on which the manure was spread, the rod yielded
nineteen quarts shelled corn, which weighed thirty-five pounds,
and allowing fifty-six pounds to the bushel, made one hundred
bushels per acre. On the acre on which the manure was put
in the hill, the rod yielded seventeen quarts of shelled corn,
which weighed thirty-one and one-quarter pounds, which makes
eighty-nine and two-sevenths bushels per acre. The expense
of the crop was as follows, viz. :-—

Interest on value of land, at $45 per acre, . $5 40

Taxes, . : : : : 54

9 cords of manure, ar $5 per aiea, : . 45 00
Ploughing, twice, ! : : 50

5
Furrowing, . - : ; : > Fee
Carting and “woe manure, - F . 4 50
Planting, : : 4 : . 425
15 quarts of dBsiy : : , : : AT
Crow line around the field, . ; : : 16
Cultivating and hoeing, twice, ; 3 5 Aaa
Cutting and binding stalks, . : : alee)
Harvesting corn, . 4 5 : : . L000
$86 12
The value of the crop is as foilows :—
Stalks, . ; : : : : : . $6 96
Husks, . : : : eds 4OU
One-half of manure nnspent ; , . 22 50
189? bushels of corn, at $1, : ; » 189 28
231 T4
$145 62

Dover, November 9, 1853.

Statement of R. Mansfield.

The field planted with corn, measures four acres and sixty-
eight rods; the soil is free and easy to work, without a single
stone upon it; it has been used as a field for growing redtop
seed, for a number of years previous to 1850; since that, it

INDIAN CORN. 179

has been pastured by milch cows, till the present year; no
manure had been put upon it; the cows had been yarded off
the land at night, thus reducing the land by continued cropping.
Last spring the land was ploughed with Keith’s plough, No. 1,
cutting a furrow about ten inches in width, not over seven in
depth; the team was two horses; it was harrowed lightly with
one horse, then furrowed both ways, so as to make about three
thousand hills to the acre. The manure used, was a mixture of
mud, with the barn and pigsty manure, through the year remain-
ing in the yards till it was put directly in the hill. The corn
was an eight-rowed variety of yellow, and had been raised for
more than forty years in this vicinity. The seed was prepared
by a method which I have practised nearly forty years, which
prevented the ravages of worms,* so that the hills were full of
stalks, with but a very few exceptions. The manure being all
put in the hills, the planting was immediately done, so there was
no loss by the sun and winds, as often happens; commenced
planting corn the 18th May; owing to stormy weather, it was
delayed till June 1st; commenced ploughing and hoeing 10th
June; we ploughed and hoed the field over three times between
this and 12th July. The stalks were cut the second week in
September; cut, bound, and piked up the same day; in about
twelve days they were taken to the barn. On the 7th of Octo-
ber commenced harvesting. The result is as follows :—

On:
By 600 bundles stalks, : : A - $12 00
8,550 pounds husks, : . : ., «32506
190 bushels corn, . : , ‘ ay, ho Oe-00

—— ee

Dr.
Interest on land, i : : ; oy BLS: 06
Taxes, i : : 1520

Ploughing two oa a one dans with two

horses, . : ; ; ! aa” 10. 00
Harrowing and aan : P ; ; 5 00

*A Receipt for preparing Seed Corn.—Dissolve four table-spoonfuls of tar in one
gallon of boiling water, and stir in immediately six quarts of corn; in two
minutes drain_off the water; then mix one pint of plaster of Paris, which will
separate the kernels for dropping.

180 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

Seed corn, thirty-three quarts, . ; . $2 00
Seventy-two loads manure, twenty-five bushels

each, : i : } , : + behabey OD
Planting, . ; ; } 2 : - wel, BO
Ploughing and hocing, first time, " , 7 50
x i second time, . : 6 00
: Mk third time, 4 ; 4 50
Cutting and curing stalks, . : : : 5 00
Harvesting, ; : é : : Paynes Be 0)
$168 80
$65 26

The corn cost sixty-five cents and six mills per bushel. Now
should we subtract one-half the expense of manure, as is the
practice of those who contend for premiums, it would have cost
but forty-six cents and seven mills per bushel. My object in
this experiment is to prove that the largest crops are not
always the most profitable.

West Nrerpuam, November, 1853.

PLYMOUTH.
Amasa Howard's Statement.

The acre of land on which I raised the crop of corn, entered
by me for a premium, is a hard, slaty soil. It had been: in
evass for the last ten years, producing, with but one top-dress-
ing in that time, annually, from one and a half to two tons of
hay. |

Last May I drew on the whole field, containing (according
to a late survey) one acre, fifty-two rods and a fraction, and
ploughed in, nine inches deep, forty-four loads of ereen manure ;
then thirty-four loads from my slaughter-house cellar, and har-
rowed it four times. From my compost heap I drew on seven-
teen loads, dropping it in-the hills; planted 23d and 24th of
May, three fect and about three or four inches one way, and
eighteen inches the other, putting three kernels in a hill. The
third weck in June cultivated it, and the fourth week cultivated
and hocd it. It was hoed again the last week in July. I did
not cut the stalks till very ripe.

INDIAN CORN. 181

Expenses were as follows :-—
Ninety-five loads of manure, at seventy-five cents, . $71 25

Carting and spreading the same, . : : : 18 20
Seed corn, bought of Calvin Leavitt, ’ d : 50
Ploughing, harrowing and furrowing, . : é 5 25
Dropping manure, and planting, . : . : 4 18
Cultivating, . - : : : : : d 1 25
Hoeing twice, j : ; ; : : é 10 40
$106 03

Deducting two-thirds manure not exhausted, . 2: 47 50
$58 53

I consider the fodder to pay for harvesting and intercst of
land.

West BripGEewater, Mass.

Calvin Leaviti's Statement.

The acre of land that produced the crop of Indian corn en-
tered by me for premium, has been mowed the two past years
Without any dressing. On the 17th and 18th of May last, I
carted on thirty-two loads of stable manure, made the past
winter. I spread the same; ploughed the 19th, and planted
20th and 21st, about three feet (little more) one way, cizhtcen
inches the other; I put no manure in the hills. The corn
planted was the smutty white, or Leonard Hill corn. I planted
four kernels in each hill. Iran a cultivator between the rows
three times during the season, and hoecd twice, the last time,
about the 20th of July. The 11th of October, the supervisor
harvested two rods, considered an average; an estimate from
which made one hundred and nine and fifty-five cizhty-fifths
bushels. Expenses :—

Nine loads manure, : . $22 50
Carting, spreading manure an aituahine tata : 8 00
Ploughing and planting, , ; : : : 6 50
Cultivating and hocing, for the season, : 7 00
Ten bushels of ashes, put onthe hills at hocing, 1 50

182 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

You will see by this statement that I have charged only
one-half the worth of manure to the corn crop; as it was very
dry the past season, I think that one-half the worth of the
manure is left for future crops. I make no estimate for harvest-
ing, as I think the fodder will amply pay for the same.

BripGewater, Mass.

Spencer Leonard, Jr’s, Statement.

The acre of land on which was raised the crop of Indian
corn entered by me for premium, is a light, sandy loam. It
was greensward, and has been mowed three years. The last
year it produced about half a ton of hay. Last May there
were nine cords of good manure spread upon the grass, and
ploughed in; then there were eighty bushels leached ashes
spread, and upon one-third of it, one hundred pounds super-
phosphate of lime were also spread, which, with the ashes,
were well harrowed in. I did not perceive any effect whatever
from the super-phosphate of lime. The corn was all planted
the 21st day of May, without any manure in the hill. Upona
part of the piece ten bushels of unleached ashes and one bushel
of plaster were applied on the top of the hills. The culti-
vator was passed through it six times, and it was hoed twice.
The corn planted was smutty white; the seed was obtained by
selecting the best ear from stalks which produced two or more
ears. Expenses :—

Nine cords manure, . : : : . $36 00
Carting and spreading same, . 4 : 10 00

Nincty bushels ashes and applying, . ; 15 00
Super-phosphate of lime, and eee : 3 00

Plaster, . : : : : 60
eliiohine and harrowing, 3.5
Planting, : 2 00
Cultivating, six times, 2 30
Hocing, twice, 5 00
Cutting stalks, 2 50
Harvesting, i 7 00
Interest on land and Beat 3 50

$90 65

INDIAN CORN. 183

Income :—
Amount of corn as measured by the super-

visor, one hundred and one and fifteen

eighty-fifths bushels, at 90 cents, . - $91 05
Two and a half tons corn fodder, at $8, 20 00
Half the manure and ashes not exhausted

by the corn crop, . 2 ° : - 30 50

$141 55

Net profit, . ; : : : : : $50 90

BripGEwATER, Mass.

Horace Collamore’s Statement.

Having entered as a competitor for the premium offered by
the Plymouth County Agricultural Society, “for the best field
of Indian corn, not less than two acres,” I will state that the
soil is a sandy loam, was in corn the last year, prior to which
it had laid in grass five or six years. About the first of May
eighty loads (of forty cubic feet) of good compost manure were
spread on the field and ploughed in with the double mould-
board Michigan plough, (averaging nine inches in depth.) It
was harrowed and planted with corn, without any manure in
the hill, on the 17th and 18th days of May, three feet apart one
way, by two feet the other. Just before weeding, twenty
bushels of leached ashes were put around the corn; it was
cultivated and hoed twice. The crop suffered very little from
the drought of June and July, which I attribute to the extra
depth of ploughing; but when the wet season commenced, it
run up rapidly to a height never before attained, I presume, by
the Whitman corn. This, I think, had a tendency to lessen the
crop in proportion to the increase of the fodder.

It is contrary to my usual practice to plant a field to Indian
corn two years in succession—a practice I would by no means
recommend to others, for I am confident that, but for this cause,
my crop would have been much larger.

In addition to the corn crop we have raised five loads of very
fine pumpkins.

184 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

A

Expenses :—

80 loads of manure, . E ; : e s $80 00
Carting and spreading manure, . : : ; 10 00
Ploughing, harrowing, and furrowing, . “ : 7 00
Planting, and seed corn, : : é } ; ~4 00
20 bushels ashes, and application, : : . 4 00
Cultivating and hocing, , : ; : : 5 00
Interest on land, . , ; : : ; . 6 00
$116 00

Deduct half the manure and ashes, . : ‘ 42 00
$74 00

One hundred and seventy-nine and sixty-five cighty-fifths
bushels of corn and five loads pumpkins cannot be worth
much less than $200. The corn fodder always pays well
for harvesting.

Pemproxke, Mass.

Samuel W. Bates’ Statement.

The three and three-fourths acres of land on which my corn was
raised is a sandy loam, inclining to clay. It was ploughed the
last of September, 1852, about seven inches deep; was mowed
before ploughing; it yielded 700 lbs. of hay to the acre. About
the first of May I carted from the barn sixteen loads of manure,
made the past winter, and spread it on about one-third of the
piece, and ploughed it in. I then drew thirty loads of compost
manure from the hog-yard, of about thirty-six cubic feet to the
load, and spread it on the furrow, and harrowed the whole
piece twice. Then I spread on the whole piece 400 bushels
leached ashes, and bushed it over and furrowed, about three
fect three inches one way, and carted on twenty-eight loads of
manure from the barnyard—which was very poor compost
manure.

On two-thirds of the land I put two-thirds of the manure in
the hills, and on the other third I spread the whole, without any
in the hills. That without any in the hills I think the best.
I dropped in the hills, twenty inches apart, the 11th and 12th
of May, three kernels of the Whitman corn, mixed with a smaller

INDIAN CORN. 185

yellow corn. The next day after planting I dropped fifty-five
bushels of dry ashes on to the hills; went throuzh with the
plouzh once, and cultivated twice; hoed twice.

Expenses :—
Ploughing, . : : a : : , $9 37
Cross ploughing, . 3 : : F : : 2 50

Four hundred bushels ashes, . ; , ‘ F 72 00
Cost of ashes and dropping, . : ; : ‘ 10 17
Twenty-one cords‘manure, . , 2 : : 63 00
Carting and spreading, . : ; : 3 ‘ 12 00
Harrowing, . ‘ ; . . ‘ : 2 1 50
Planting and furrowing, . ‘ : : : : 6 75
Ploughing and cultivating, . : ° ‘ . 3 00
Hoeing, . : ; 4 : - ‘ : : 12 00
Seed corn, . : : ‘ ; ‘ : : 1 50

$193 79

Brivcewater, Mass.

Corn ror FoppErR.

From the Report of the Committee on Farms, in Norfolk:
County.

The cultivation of this hizhly nutritious, succulent food, was-
long azo recommended by one of the most eminent azvriculturists
in this part of our country, the Hon. Timothy Pickering, of Salem,.
first president of the Essex Agricultural Society. In this.
county, as in Kssex, and elsewhere, it has been uniformly
attended with the best results. Tracts of old pasture land,.
and of light, sandy soil, have been made to produce large crops
of this choice feed for dairy cows, at a period when the grass.
on such land would have failed to furnish even a tolerable
supply; while, at the same time, the soil has been placed in the
most suitable condition for future tillage and other crops.

The experience of a farmer in this county, who has grown
corn fodder for many years, has been an increase of succulent
and nutritious feed sufficient to sustain double the number of
cows formerly kept on the same land. His mode of cultivating
it has been chiefly by the use of the plough. The ground being

24*

186 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

in proper condition, is deeply furrowed with a large plough”
These furrows are supplied with a heavy dressing of green
manure, or of green and compost thoroughly mixed. Sweet
corn, or a mixture of sweet and Northern field corn, is sown
thickly upon them, and the soil is turned back to cover it, by the
horse plough passing on each side of the furrow. This, with
slight use of the hoe, will sufficiently cover and level the top
of the drill, and one repetition of the ploughing and hoeing
will finish the necessary labor on the growing crop. The sweet
corn is found to produce a more succulent and tender stalk and
leaf than the white Southern corn, which is usually planted.
Cattle will eat it with avidity and entirely, while the coarse
stalk of the other sort is often left untouched upon the field,
or inthe crib. The leaf is broader and draws more nourish-
ment from the atmosphere, and the whole plant is less exhaust-
ing to the soil, and more grateful'to the cattle. The superior
effect of its use is also to be traced in the quality of the milk
and the butter.

The extensive culture of this article, is therefore recom-
mended, with the full belief that the benefit of it will be seen in
the large increase of stock which can be well kept on the same
number of acres, and in the general products and profits of
our farms. We add, also, that the use of green corn fodder
as the principal food, has been found amply sufficient to sustain
and keep in good, thriving condition, store pigs, from its first
growth until the autumn frosts are felt.

From a brief experience, we are disposed to recommend,
with much confidence, the “Stowell,” or “Evergreen Sweet
Corn,” as the most productive variety to be grown on our soil.
From this corn, with no great labor or cost, from five to ten
tons of the richest feed may be raised on any acre of ground
which would have failed to yield, under the best cultivation,
three, or even two, tons of hay, or in pasture, to have kept, in
good condition, one cow. If cut early and dried in small
bundles on the fence, or in stooks, after wilting in the sun, this
plant affords excellent winter feed for all sorts of stock, and
if chopped and steamed, mixed with meal or barley meal, for
fattening cattle and swine.

WHEAT. 187

WHEAT.

WORCESTER NORTH.

Joel Hayward’s Statement.

Gentlemen, I offer for premium one acre of spring wheat, on
which I raised thirty-two and a quarter bushels. The land was
a deep loam, and was planted to corn last season, to which crop
was applied thirty-three loads of manure. Last spring it was
ploughed twice, and sowed April 20th with two bushels of
Italian spring wheat; the last of May we applied two hundred
pounds of plaster ; Heahestdd the 5th and 6th days of August.

Edward Smith's Statement

The field on which my wheat grew was planted with corn
last year, with about twenty-five cart loads of manure to the
acre. The expense of the present year’s crop is as follows :—

Splitting the hills, myself and oxen, : : d $1 00
Plouzhing, one and a half day, : ; : é 3 00

Sowing and harrowing, . : : - : : 1 50
Harvesting, . ! ‘ 4 ; ; : : 2 00
Threshing and winnowing, . : : ; 3 00
Seed, two and three-quarter aeties ; ; é 2 18

$12 68

The above is the expense of one and a half acres.

The field was measured by Mr. Woodward. Mr. Whitney
measured the grain when it was threshed, and pronounced it
thirty-three bushels. Weight, sixty-six pounds per bushel.

HAMPSHIRE.

Statement of Washington Miller.

I offer for premium a crop of wheat raised on one acre, in
Sunderland. From this acre I took a fine crop of potatoes last
fall. The year previous the land was a piece of old meadow.
I harrowed and manured in the hill, putting a small shovelful of
compost and a handful of lime and ashes in each hill. About

188 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

the middle of September I ploughed and sowed a bushel and a
half of pure seed wheat, selected from the largest heads in the
bundies of my previous crops. In October I sowed three
bushels of stone lime, which had been soaked in brine; and last
spring I added cight bushels of oyster-shell lime that had been
brine slacked. I reaped, about the 12th of July, thirty-three
bushels and three pecks, weight measure.

Value of crop :—
333 bushels, at $1.50, . - 5 - $50 50

Straw sold, . ; : f : : 5 00
$55 50
Expenses :—
Seed, : j 4 ; : : , $2 25
Ploughing and harrowing, : ‘ ‘ 3 00
Jame, ‘ ‘ ‘ ; ‘ , 2 69
Harvesting and threshing, . , ‘ 5 56
Interest on land, . : : : Z 6 50

20 00

Net gain, : 2 : : : : - $35 50
StNDERLAND, Mass.

Statement of N. §& B. Smith.

The quantity of land on which our crop of wheat was raised
was one acre and seven rods, in Sunderland. In 1851 manure
was spread upon the land, and a crop of Indian corn taken off;
grass seed was sowed at the third hoecing. In June, 1852,a
crop of clover and herds-grass was cut, yielding about one and
a half tons. We harrowed with a seed harrow, ploughed deep,
and rolled before sowing wheat. The quantity of seed used
was a bushel and twenty-two quarts. We sown and harrowed
September 3d, 1852, and harvested July 12th and 13th, 1853.
In the spring we applied five bushels of oyster-shell lime, slacked
in the brine from a bushel of salt; also five bushels of ashes,
This dressing appeared to increase the crop, and to strengthen
the straw, so much that a very small part of it lodged.

WHEAT. 189

Value of crop :—

35} bushels wheat, ; : : : $53 62
2,300 pounds of straw, . : ; : 7 00
—— $60 62
Expenses :-—
Seed, : . : : : : : $2 58
Ploughing, harrowing, rolling, and sowing, . 3.75
Harvesting and threshing, : : 7 00
Lime, ashes, and salt—preparing and ap-
plying the same, 5 : : 5 3 00
Interest onland, . : : ; F 7 00
‘23:33

Net gain, . 5 : : : ; - + $329

HAMPDEN.

Amos M. Carlion’s Statement.

The crop of wheat which I offer for premium, was grown on
one and a half acres of land, for the use of which, with the
manure furnished, I pay a rent of ten dollars per annum. The
soil is a dark, heavy, sand loam, in part; the remainder is lizhter
from an increase of sand; it was planted the two previous
years, year before last, with potatoes, without manure; last
year, well manured, and planted with corn and potatoes; the
produce, forty bushels of corn, and sixty-two of potatoes.
Value of crop, sixty-one dollars. The crop was removed about
the middle of September, and the land prepared for the present
crop. ‘Two bushels and a half of seed were used, with a light
top-dressing of manure. The land was well harrowed and
seeded with grass seed. The crop of wheat was harvested in
July, and the yield was fifty-two bushels of wheat; equal to
thirty-four and two-thirds bushels per acre. The expense of
cultivation was as follows :—

For preparing the land, sowing and harrow-

ing in seed : : : ; gos © Sas 00
Seed, . . 4 : , : : PING els
Harvesting, . : : : : , eT 6t

190 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

“

Threshing, . : 4 4 - ; . $7 00
Land rent, . - : : - : 10:00

$33 25
Value of 52 bushels wheat, at $1.50, .. . $78 00
. straw, . : : : : «OG
88 00
Balance in favor of the crop, . j . : $54 75

Actual cost of raising the crop, sixty-four cents per bushel.

I will also present you with a statement of what may be con-
sidered by those looking for great results, rather unimportant
intelligence. Yet, in comparison with the actual profits of the
crop, as by the table furnished in the society’s report for 1851,
from several of the greatest wheat growing States, it will be
noticed that this accidental crop, if the term be admissable,
gave a larger actual return of profits than the average results
from those States.

The acre of ground upon which the crop of wheat was raised
in 1852, and for which I was awarded the society’s premium,
was soon after harvest, prepared for a crop of turnips, by
ploughing under the stubble, and harrowing in a top-dressing
of fine manure, and then sowed with turnip seed. These were
soon up and presented a promising appearance; but soon the
wheat, which was unavoidably scattered in harvesting the crop,
began to show itself, and claiming precedence of right, very
s00n overspread the ground, and so shaded the turnips that a
very small crop of them was obtained. Last spring, the wheat
(thus buried) looked so promising, I was induced to stimulate
its growth by applying a top-dressing of two hundred pounds
of plaster mixed with two barrels of ashes, and await the re-
sult. It was harvested in July. The yield was twenty-two
bushels of clean grain, weighing sixty pounds per bushel. The
avails of this crop follow :—

22 bushels of wheat, at $1.50, : : Se pom |
Straw, . : ; A : : : eee!)

Cost of plaster andyashes, . ) : PT G2 0
a harvest and threshing, : ; «16700

WHEAT. 191

Cost of land rent, : : : : . $10 00
$17 00

Balance in favor of crop, : : . ? $21 00
Cost per bushel, seventy-nine cents.

I consider the turnips paid the expense of ploughing the
land, and the manure used, and I have not included them in the
account.

BERKSHIRE.

From the Report of the Committee.

Mr. Baldwin, of Egremont, had two acres of blue stem (win-
ter) wheat, sown on pasture land, ploughed six inches deep, Ist
of July, subsequently ploughed three times and harrowed three ;
two and a half bushels seed to the acre, soaked twelve hours
in brine, then rolled in lime. Sowed 10th of September. No
manure.

Mr. Curtis, of Great Barrington, had four acres, sown on
oat stubble, light plain land, ploughed once—twelve loads
coarse manure harrowed in. Two bushels blue stem sown to
the acre, without any preparation, September 6. An acre of
this wheat was threshed, and yielded 2,554 pounds of most
beautiful wheat.

Mr. Laird, of Great Barrington, had five acres, directly
south of the Van Deusenville Furnace. Ground well sprinkled
with quartz boulders. We saw this in the swarth, but it ap-
peared to us very heavy. It was threshed and sold for seed,
and is reported to have fallen but a few pounds short of forty
bushels to the acre.

It was the blue stem, sown with fourteen loads manure to
the acre, 1st of September. Seed soaked in brine.

The blue stem wheat was brought to this county four years
ago, by O. Curtiss, of Sheffield, and has proved very valuable.
We examined very fine wheat belonging to Mr. E. Kel-
loge, of Sheffield; Nelson Joyner, of Egremont; Enos Smith,
of Stockbridge; R. Mills, and D. A. Bulkley of Williamstown,
and 8. Powell of Lanesborough.

192, MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

Mr. Coman, of Pittaficld, showed us very heavy wheat on
ground which received last year, twenty-cizht loads of muck
and turf, which had been one year in the hog-pen, and gave
about sixty-five bushels of corn to the acre. ;

This season, it was ploughed and harrowed once, and the
seed ploughed in. Twoand one-cizhth bushels of secd, soaked
in strony brine and rolled in lime. No manure or other fer-
tilizer.

The wheat of Mr. Richards, of Lenox, was on corn ground,
which reccived, last year, sixteen loads of manure to the acre, _
and gave ciglhty bushels of corn. This scason no manure was
used. Wheat sown the lst of May, two bushels per acre,
ploughed twice.

The wheat of Mr. Lawton, of Great Barrington, was sown
after turnips, two and one-half bushels Mediterrancan wheat,
the 25th of April.

Mr. Cook, of Richmond, showed us two pieces—one of Black
Sea and the other Mediterranean, both aftercorn. The ground
was old meadow, plouzhed seven inches, and well manured, and
gave agood crop ofcorn. It hadno manure thisyear. Ploughed
once, scven or eight inches.

HOUSATONIC.
From the Report of the Committee.

Never were such ficlds of beautiful wheat scen in Southern
Berkshire, showing conclusively that the time has come, when
We can raise this grain in sufficient quantitics for home con-
sumption, and of as good quality as can be grown in any
country. :

Statement of Ira Curtiss, of Sheffield.

Winter Wheat.—This piece of wheat contained four acres,
very heavy and even; oat stubble, ploughed once, and sown
the 6th of September—two bushels to the acre; twelve loads
coarse manure spread on the furrow to the acre, no prepara-
tion of seed, soil sandy loam.

This wheat is known as the “Blue Stem Wheat,” and was

WHEAT. 193

introduced into this county four years since from Western New
York, by Orrin Curtiss, of Sheffield, and is the kind that is now
generally raised, and is probably the best for our soil and cli-
mate. Mr. Curtiss has measured and threshed very carefully
one acre of his wheat, from which he had forty-two bushels and
thirty-four pounds, of sixty pounds to the bushel, of most beau-
tiful wheat.

Statement of Mark Laird.

Winter Wheat.—The piece contains five acres blue stem
wheat, on oat stubble, fourteen loads of manure spread on to the
acre, and ploughed in; sown 1st September, seed soaked in
brine, and rolled in lime; soil, loam; measured and threshed
one acre, and had thirty-nine bushels and eight and a half pounds,
sixty pounds to the bushel.

Statement of Elisha Kellogg.

Winter Wheat—Blue stem wheat, one acre, on pasture,
ploughed once, and sown immediately, first week in September,
with two bushels of seed; no manure, soil, sandy loam; had
thirty-eight bushels and nine quarts on the acre.

Spring Wheat.—This crop will not compare with winter
wheat, either in quantity or quality. It is, however, a good
crop on some soils, and in some sections of our county where
winter wheat cannot be successfully grown. It does best in a
moist strong soil.

The first premium on spring wheat, we award to Charles
Hinckley, of Lee. This piece of wheat was sown after corn,
about the 10th of April, two bushels seed to the acre; soil,
clayey loam.

The second premium on the second best acre of spring wheat,
we give to Zacheus Candee, of Sheffield. Tea spring wheat,
sown after corn, about the middle of April; two bushels seed
to the acre; soil, loam.

The third premium on spring wheat, we award to J. R.
Lawton, Jr., of Great Barrington. This wheat was sown the
25th of April, after turnips, two and a half bushels of seed to
the acre; soil, clayey loam.

25*

194 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

We award a gratuity to Joseph Kline, of Egremont, for a
piece of excellent spring wheat of a new variety, which he
has been to some expense and trouble to introduce here, and
which bids fair to be valuable, called the “Bald Club Wheat.”

NORFOLK.

Statement of Horatio Mason.

The field of wheat entered by me for premium, contains one
acre and forty rods; the soil gravel, and subject to drought; it
has formerly been ploughed lightly. Last year I ploughed it
full two inches deeper, (about eight inches,) and spread the
dry parts with clay, at the rate of twenty loads per acre;
planted with corn; manured in the hill with twelve loads com-
post—one-third mud, one-third clay, the remainder barnyard
manure—and received a good crop. After the corn was re-
moved, I again spread the dry parts with clay. In April of
this year, I ploughed in the clay, and spread the whole field
with twelve loads green manure, and ploughed it in; then
sowed it with spring wheat, and harrowed in; the produce was
one thousand three hundred and eighty pounds. I have not, in
the account, charged for the clay. I consider that a large share’
of it remains for the benefit of future crops.

I charge for the
Two ploughings, . , : : - .» $3.0
Sowing and harrowing, 1 5
One-half twelve loads manure, . 6 0
Reaping, binding, say $4; threshing, $4, f 8 00
Two bushels seed, at $1.50, 3 0
Interest on land, worth say $50 per acre ; ee 4 2

Cr.—By twenty-three bushels wheat, at $1.50, . . $34 50

East Mepway, November, 1853.

WHEAT. 195

PLYMOUTH.
Statement of Joseph Kingman.

The land on which I raised my winter wheat is rather high
ground and what may be called a sandy loam, about half of
which had been planted two years; first to corn, and then to
early potatoes. The wheat was sown after harvesting the pota-
toes, about the 15th of September ; the other part was sward land,
planted to corn last year, and the wheat sown immediately after
taking the corn off, the very last of September. The kind
sown was the white flint, about five pecks to the acre. The
land, when planted, was pretty well manured, but not heavily,
say about fifteen ox-cart loads to the acre. No manure used
on the wheat, except a load or two from the sink, and twenty
bushels of leached ashes put on the poorest part. The wheat
came up well, and spread so as nearly to cover the ground be-
fore winter. There was but very little killed by the winter.
It grew luxuriantly and produced a large crop of straw. The
wheat, I think, suffered a little from the drought in July, but
notwithstanding, I had twenty-five and a half bushels of as fine
wheat as I ever saw from three-fourths of an acre and fourteen
rods.

West BrinGEwatTeER.

BARNSTABLE.
Statement of J. H. Knowles.

The wheat I offer for a premium was raised on half an acre
of land. Manured at the rate of fifty loads to the acre, of
barnyard manure; ploughed about ten inches deep, and planted
with corn. The wheat sown about the 15th of September,
among the corn, and hoed in. The value of the land was about
$80 per acre. The produce was eight bushels on the half acre.
Five pecks of seed were sown to the acre.

Dr.
Two and one-half pecks seed, . : . $0 75
Hoeing in, . 7 : : ; ‘ ; 75
Harvesting, : ; ‘ ‘ : : 1 00

—— $2.58

196 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

Eight bushels, at $1295; 0° FP Se poo boy prigaee

Profits, .., ; ; F : ; ‘ . $7.50

EasTHam.

RYE.
ESSEX.

Statement of William F. Porter.

IT offer for premium a crop of winter rye, raised on one acre;
the soil is of a sandy loam. In the summer of 1851 it yielded
about one ton of hay per acre. In September following it was
ploughed eight inches deep, and on the 15th, ten loads of
compost manure to the acre were applied, thirty-five bushels
to the load. One bushel of rye sown, covered with the har-
row and rolled. On the 12th of July, 1852, it was harvest-
ed, and threshed out the last of August, and yielded twenty-
eight and three-fourths bushels. On the 23d and 24th of Sep-
tember, 1852, the stubble was turned under, and ten loads of
compost manure from the barn cellar, of about equal parts loam
and cow manure, were applied, one bushel of rye sown, har-
rowed and rolled. On the 13th of July last it was cut with
sickle and cradle, bound and carted into the barn the 16th,
threshed out the 19th and 20th of August. The yield was
thirty-four and five-eighths bushels, of fifty-eight pounds to the
bushel. The weight of the straw was thirty-eight hundred and
sixty pounds.

The expense of cultivating the said crop was as follows :—
For one man and one pair of oxen one aa

ploughing, : ' $1 67
Carting and Pe eondiny ten iad of manure, i
the same, ; 1 67

Sowing, harrowing oe laa slits one man
and one pair of oxen one day, - : 1 67

RYE. 197

Cradling, one man one day, é : : $0 83
Binding and carting into barn, one man one
day, one pair of oxen halfaday, . - 1 25

Threshing, one man three days, . ‘ 2 50
Carting the straw to Haverhill, one mile ae
a half, . : 1 50

One bushel of rye sown, $1.12; ten leads
of manure, $10, - : : ‘ F 1 ih a

—— 22 21
Value of crop, thirty-four and five eighths
bushels, sold at $1.121 per bushel, . « $38e95
3,860 pounds of straw mold at sh cents per
hundred, . . : ; : : 19 30
tie anda UR Ee
Net profit, . : , : : , - $36 04

Braprorp, November 1, 1853.

WORCESTER WEST.

Statement of William A. Johnson.

I mowed off a crop of hay, 1st July, and ploughed it up.
About the middle of August I harrowed and sowed on five pecks
of seed and used no manure.

Expenses :-—
First ploughing, . : - $3 00
My boy and team Beiaine in, one Gay? ; , 1 00
Reaping and getting in, three days, : : 4 00
Threshing, (every eleventh bushel—four bush-

els, nearly,) p : - 5 : ; 4 00

——$12 00
Value of crop :—
Forty-two bushels rye, . : , : . $42 00
Two tons straw, . : : : : oy £200
54 00
$42 00

We, the subscribers, certify that we threshed Mr. Johnson’s

198 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

rye, and saw him measure it, and there were forty-two bushels
clean rye.
Harrison NewrTon.
WituiaAmM WiILson.

The plan filed shows one acre and eighteen rods. The rye
weighed, by Mr. Johnson, sixty and one-quarter pounds to the
bushel.

KE. Woops, Secretary.

HAMPSHIRE.

Statement of George Dickinson.

The land on which this crop was raised contains three acres
and thirty-six rods of second quality meadow land. In 1852 it
was planted to corn, and manured at the rate of ten loads to
the acre, spread on and harrowed in. After the corn had been
cut and stacked the rye was sown, at the rate of one bushel
and one peck to the acre. I harvested in July, threshed in
August, and the yield was one hundred thirty bushels and eight
quarts, averaging forty bushels and ten quarts per acre, at
fifty-six pounds to the bushel.

Value of crop :—
130, bushels, at 80 cents, . : : $104 20

31 tons straw, at $6, . : 5 : 18 86

$123 06
Expenses :—

Interest on land, at $100 per acre, . . $19 50

Labor, .. ; : , ; , ‘ 20 5

Team, . 4 : : : 5 . 8 00

Four bushels seed, at 75 cents, : ‘ 3 00
51 25
Net profit, . : ; : , : densi LS

Hapiry, November 24, 1853.

Statement of N. & B. Smith.

_ The land on which our rye was raised contains one acre seven
and a half rods. A crop of wheat was taken off in 1852, yield-
ing about twelve bushels per acre. No manure was applied

RYE. 199

after the spring of 1851, and then it was put in the hill for
broomcorn. The rye was sown on the 8th of September, at
the rate of one bushel to the acre, and harvested on the 15th of
July. The land was ploughed deep, and thoroughly harrowed.

Value of crop :—

' 331 bushels rye, at $1, $30 50
2, 900 pounds of straw, at $6 per ton : 8 70
$42 20
Expenses :—
Seed, . P é j : ‘ $1 00
Ploughing, harrowing, aa sowing, . : 2 00
Harvesting, : : : d : 2 50
Threshing, - - : : : 2 00
Interest on land, 6 00
13 50
Net profit, . ; : ‘ ‘ , . $28 70

SUNDERLAND, October 22, 1853.

HOUSATONIC.
From the Report of the Committee.

Twenty-five pieces of rye were offered for our inspection.
The winter, and the season also, has been very favorable for
this crop. Of the twenty-five pieces, not one but would ordi-
narily be entitled to a premium. Such fields of rye your com-
mittee have no recollection of ever seeing.

Statement of Luther S. Butler.

The piece contains six acres, old pasture, ploughed once, and
sowed 10th September, one anda half bushel seed to the acre,
no manure used; soil, clayey loam; measured and threshed
one acre; had forty bushels and four quarts.

Statement of Lorenzo H. Rice.

Oat stubble, ploughed once, and sowed the first week in
September, one and a half bushel seed to the acre, no manure
used; soil, gravelly-loam, eight acres in the piece; had on one
acre a fraction over-forty-four bushels.

200 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

a

Statement of Nathaniel Cook.

The piece contains two acres, sown after wheat, the first
week in September, one and a half bushel to the acre; twenty
loads of manure put on the two acres; had gravelly soil; had
thirty-nine bushels and nine quarts to the acre, weighing fifty-
seven pounds to the bushel.

Statement of Joseph H. Chapin.

The piece contains four acres, sown after the spring wheat,
15th September, one and a half bushel seed to the acre; soil,
sandy loam.

Statement of Robert B. Brown.

The piece contains twelve acres, old pasture, ploughed once,
and sowed the first week in September; no manure; soil,
gravelly loam.

NORFOLK.

Statement of B. F. Dudley.

The land on which this rye was raised, was used as a pasture '
until the fall of 1851, when it was ploughed with a Michigan
plough. The following spring, it was planted with corn,
potatoes, and barley. These crops were manured in the hill,
with about four cords to the acre; the barley was manured at
the same rate spread broadcast.

''These crops were taken off, and on the 7th of October,
1852, the rye was sown.

The land from which this crop was taken, contains a frac-

tion short of three acres.

Expense of the crop :—
Ploughing, ; ! é ‘ : . $10 00
6 cords pig manure, and carting, . - 36 00
20 bushels leached ashes and old plaster, 2 00
33 bushels rye, and sowing, ; - 50
Harrowing, bushing, and rolling, 00

bo

BARLEY. 201

Reaping, binding, and stooking, . ; . $15 00
Moving and stacking, : : a we 6°00
Threshing and winnowing, . ; . sim LG, 59
$92 09
Value of the crop :—
132? bushels rye, at 90 cents, . : 2 S19.52
T tons, 300 Ibs. straw, at 75 cents per
GW, -.« : : : 5 », LOT 25
226 TT
$134 68

The above crop is at the rate of forty-seven and a half
bushels to the acre; and the land on which it was raised has
always been called worn-out plain, and considered worth about
$50 per acre.

Miron, September 26, 18538.

BARU Y.

BERKSHIRE.

From the Report of the Committee.

E. R. Colt, Pittsfield, and E.S. Rowley, of Richmond, showed
us crops, which in some seasons, would have commanded some-
thing more than a badge of honor. It seems as yet, to be an
Open question whether the two or six-rowed barley gives the
best returns. The six-rowed has shorter heads, and usually
lighter kernels, but more in number. It appeared to us, as we
saw them growing adjacent to each other, that the two-rowed
would bear sowing some thicker than the other, and is not as
liable to fall down before it is well filled. We saw splendid
crops of both kinds.

26*

202 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

a

NORFOLK,
Statement of Horatio Mason.

The field of barley contains one acre. It embracesa variety
of soil, from a rich, gravel loam, on one side, to meadow mud
on the other. It was planted with cornlast year. This spring,
the ground was ploughed, and spread with thirteen loads of
green manure, and ploughed in, and sown with two bushels of
four-rowed barley. The part of the field next to the upland is
well adapted to this crop, and produced as fine a crop as I have
ever seen, while the flat land next to the meadow was very
light.

Expense of cultivating :—

Twice ploughing, $2.50; cultivating and
sowing, $1, . A ; : ; - $3 50

Threshing and harvesting, . ; : : 6 00
One-half the manure, $6.50; interest on
land, at $70.42 per acre, , 10 70
Two bushels seed, $2; taxes, say 30 ou 2 30
$22 50
Cr.—By 40 bushels barley, at 90 cents, . : 36 00
$13 50

East Mepway, November, 1853.

PLYMOUTH.

Statement of Spencer Leonard, Jr.

The land on which I made an experiment in raising barley, is
a light sandy soil; it was planted to corn last year, and pro-
duced a good crop. This year, it was ploughed April 29th and
May 3d; three bushels of barley were sown per acre, and on
one-half of it, two hundred pounds super-phosphate of lime,
and the other half, two hundred pounds of plaster, and all well
harrowed in and rolled. There was no material difference in
either half of the acre, at any stage of its growth, or in the
grain adjoining, where nothing was applied. It was cut in

OATS. 203

July, and in August it was threshed by hand, producing twenty-
five bushels on one acre and seventeen rods.

Expenses :—

Super-phosphate of lime and plaster, . - $6 00
Three bushels barley, . : ‘ : : 2 25
Ploughing, . ; : : : : : 1 50

Sowing and harrowing, : : : ; 1 75
Cutting and getting in, ° : - ‘ 2 00
Threshing and cleaning, . : : ‘ 3 50
Interest on land, , ‘ d ; : 4 50
$21 50
Income :—
Twenty-five bushels barley, at 75 cents, ~» $19 25
One ton straw, . : 4 : : : 8 00
27 25
$5 75

I think that the crop was injured from thirty to forty per cent.,
by the dry weather, which occurred at the most critical period
of its growth.

OATS.
Statement of George W. Wood.

The acre of land I raised my oats on, is a clayey loam, and
it is the same on which I raised my corn last year. I managed
as follows :—

April 29th, ploughed; May 2d, sowed the oats, (three bushels
and three pecks); the wind blowing, it took more oats than I
expected, but I do not think it any loss.

After ploughing, I harrowed, then sowed the oats; went
over with the cultivator, and harrowed again, till the soil was
very fine; I then bush-harrowed it twice. I have found by ex-
perience, that working the soil is of great advantage for spring
grain. I cut the oats the 25th of July, and threshed them

204 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

the 30th of September; they measured sixty bushels and one
peck. The expense, I think, will not exceed twelve dollars.

Statement of Silvanus Hinkley.

The acre of land on which I raised the crop of oats entered
by me for premium, is a gravelly loam; I have planted it with
corn the two past years, spreading on about thirty loads of
compost manure, each year. Last spring, I put on about fifteen
loads of manure, one-half before ploughing, and the other half,
after. I ploughed the last of March, and the 3d of April
sowed four bushels of oats, and harrowed them in. The half
acre I put the manure on after ploughing, I think was the best;
the straw was much the largest. Harvested in August, and
threshed and measured up fifty-nine bushels and three pecks.

BEANS.

NORFOLK.

Statement of Benjamin N. Sawin.

The half acre of white beans which I offer for premium was
raised on soil of a light, sandy loam, which has been improved
as a pasture for nineteen years, without any cultivation. In
November, 1852, it was ploughed for the purpose of killing out
the bushes, (consisting of white birch, sage willow, &c.;) the
1st of June last it was harrowed with a cultivator harrow
across the furrows, and furrowed with a plough, one way, three
feet apart; I then applied one and a half cords of unfermented
manure, taken from the barn cellar, put half of a shovelful in
the hill, eighteen inches apart in the row. The beans were
planted the 10th of June; put from twelve to fifteen beans in a
hill; they were hoed but once. They were harvested the 1st
of October, and when threshed, measured eight bushels and
four quarts. They weighed seventy pounds to the bushel.
They were of the variety called the pea bean.

BEANS. 205

Expenses :—
Interest on value of land, at $30 per acre, $0 90
aaxes, - ; ° : - : - 09
Harrowing, 7 - : 64
Furrowing and apap manures! 7. : 1 20
Planting, é : P 1 72
One and a half cords ‘of manure, at $4. 50, 6 75
Twelve and a half quarts seed, : : 75
Cultivating and hoeing, . : : . 1 00
Harvesting, : : : : : : 1 25
—— $13 10:
Value of the crop :—
Hight and one-eighth bushels of beans, at $2
per bushel, . ‘ . $16 25
Four hundred and fifty aie ee at
thirty cents per hundred, 1 35
One-half of manure unspent, . : : 3 37
20 9F
Leaves net profit of . : : 5 < $7 27.

Dover, Noy. 9, 1853.

PLYMOUTH.

Statement of Abiel Bassett.

The half acre of land on which I raised the crop of white
beans entered by me for premium, is a light, sandy soil. In
1851 I put on sixty bushels of leached ashes, and sowed it to —
winter rye. The first of last May I spread on nineteen cart-
loads of stable manure, and ploughed it in; the ground was
well harrowed; furrowed two feet between furrows, and planted
in drills, with about three pecks of seed.

The beans were pulled and stacked in the field until they
were dried; they were then threshed, and measured seventeen
bushels and three pecks—making thirty-five and a half bushels.
to the acre.

206 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

a

BARNSTABLE.

Statement of R. Smith.

I have for three years been engaged in raising the marrow-
fat bean, and have this year three acres in one lot. The land
cost, last winter, $30 per acre, and had been lying fallow for
twenty years. I carted fourteen horse-loads of manure to the
poorest spots, and ploughed May 10th; harrowed thoroughly,
and stirred it with cultivator twice before planting, which I did
June 15th, with one bushel of seed to the acre. With a ma-
chine of my own construction, I planted two acres a day, with
a boy and horse. It was planted in drills, two feet apart.
When high enough to work, I used the cultivator between the
rows, and my boy followed with a hoe. I then planted turnips
between the rows. The beans were then left till harvest.
The result is stated below :—

Estimated seventy-five bushels of beans, $2, $150 00
oe one hundred bushels turnips, 30c.,. 30 00

$180 00

Cost of preparing soil, seed, manure, cultivation and
harvesting, . : : : - : : . 42 90
Proves,” \. : ; ; ; : : . $137 10

GRASS SEED.

HAMPSHIRE, FRANKLIN AND HAMPDEN.

Statement of George Dickinson.

I have raised, the past season, three bushels and thirty-one
quarts of herds-grass seed on two acres and sixty-nine rods of
ground. A sample of the seed was exhibited at the late fair.

The land on which the seed grew is a clayey loam, with a
very hard subsoil. It was ploughed in the spring of 1852 and

ROOT CROPS. 207

sown to oats; but, owing to the dry weather, produced only
alight crop. In August the land was ploughed and subsoiled
about a foot deep, and sown the fourth of September with one-
half bushel of seed to the acre, and harrowed in. A part of the
crop was mown the first week in August; the remainder stood
a fortnight longer, and was then cradled and reaped. It was
estimated that the part mown wasted nearly one-half the seed
before it was threshed, it being dried thoroughly for hay.

The account with the crop stands as follows :—
Dr

Grass seed, : : : : ; . $4 50
Ploughing, . : : : : 7 : 8 00

Sowing and harrowing, : ° - 1 25
Interest on the land at $40 per ae, : ; 6 00
Taxes, : , ; : : 1 00
Cutting and isis, : . : : 5 00
$25 T5
Cr.
Three bushels, thirty-one quarts, at $3.50 per
bushel, . : . : « : SLS— 88
One ton and a half of fy a $8 per ton, . 12 00 up
—— 2

——_—_

Net, . f : 4 , ‘ : $0 14

The above statement I believe to be true and correct.

HADLEY.

ROOT CROPS.

An appropriate introduction to this section, is to be found in
the Transactions of the Norfolk Society, of which the Commit-
tee on Essays (Hon. Marshall P. Wilder, chairman,) speak as
follows :—

“The committee have examined this paper with much
pleasure. It is a sensible, well-written production—practical

208 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

in character, useful in its tendency, and is evidently from the
pen of one accustomed to present his views in a clear and per-
spicuous manner. This essay furnishes information and sug-
gestions valuable to farmers, wherever located, and affords
gratifying evidence that we have, among that worthy class of
our fellow-citizens whose peculiar profession is to cultivate
the soul rather than the soil, those who are qualified to
discuss the most difficult topics, and give direction and
encouragement to thinking men, and especially to those belong-
ing to the great interest of agriculture.

“The committee consider this Essay on the Potato, written
by Rev. Jonn M. Merrick, of Walpole, as one of the best
which has been presented to the society.”

In the following remarks, I confine myself within a narrow
range, and leave unsaid many things respecting the culture,
gathering, preservation and uses of potatoes, which might
perhaps have been interesting to the farmers of Norfolk Coun-
ty. I shall speak briefly of the history, uses, planting, and
diseases of the potato, in the hope that this imperfect essay
may provoke my fellow citizens to deeper investigations, to
more numerous and intelligent experiments with reference to
these subjects. Diligent inquiries and accurate experiments
promise the only satisfactory results. The members of this
society are earnestly requested to preserve their farm journals,
that at some subsequent occasion we may compare notes, and
from our united efforts, increase our knowledge and learn the
best methods of applying it to practice.*

"1, History of the Potato—It is remarkable that the history
of a plant which has exerted so great an influence upon the
civilization of the world, should be involved in so much obscuri-
ty. It is difficult, if not impossible, to ascertain the time at
which, or the nations by whom, it was transported from South
America to distant regions. The Spaniards found it only in

* Ihave recently received a letter from an intelligent member of our society now
in England. From diligent inquiries, in several agricultural counties, he learns
that the potato rot prevails extensively this season ; and that the potatoes not dis-
eased are very few, small, and of inferior quality. Such facts here and there should
furnish a motive to careful and continued experiments, if we would not abandon
the cultivation of a plant so intimately connected with our agricultural prosperity.

ROOT CROPS. 209

Chili, though recently it has been said to grow wild in Peru,
New Granada, and Mexico. Humboldt quotes De la Vega as
saying, that in the times of the Incas, maize and potatoes, and
in the warm regions, bananas constituted the basis of the
nourishment of the Indians.* Clavigero says “the potato was
brought into Mexico from South America, és native home.t
The Abbe Molina asserts that it grew wild in almost every
field.t Sir Walter Raleigh speaks of having seen potatoes in
Guiana ;§ but probably these were sweet potatoes, the climate
of Guiana not being adapted to the Solanum Tuberosum.
Darwin, in the “ Voyage of a Naturalist,’ says: “The wild
potato grows on these islands (the island of Chonos and others
on the Pacific Coast of South America) in great abundance, near
the beach. The tubers were generally small; but I found one
that was two inches in diameter. When boiled they shrunk
much, and were watery and insipid, without any bitter taste.”
There is no question that it was found wild in Chili, nor that
from Chili it was carried to Southern Europe by the Spanish
colonists.

But how it reached England is not so evident. The opinion
has long prevailed that it was introduced from Virginia into
England by Sir Walter Raleigh, in 1586. Even so discriminat-
ing a writer as Humboldt is deceived by the authority of Sir
Joseph Banks, and others, and takes great pains to account for
its existence in Virginia, aware that it was indigenous nowhere
else in North America. It would be difficult to show that
Raleigh ever was in Virginia. The colonizing expedition in
which he was concerned reached Albemarle, some distance .
further south. There is reason to believe that the misunder-
standing arose from a confusion of names. The early naviga-
tors, careless of botanical distinctions, may have applied the
name of potato to the Solanum Tuberosum, and the Batatas
Edulis or sweet potato, the latter alone being indigenous in
the southern parts of North America. This was early carried
to England, and cultivated. It is several times mentioned by
Shakspeare and other writers.

There is some conflicting testimony on this point ; for Gerard,

* New Spain, Volume ii. p. 370. + History of Mexico, p. 27.
{ Nat. History of Chili, p. 108. § Works, Volume ii. p. 194.

rH

210 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

in his “Herbal,” published in 1633, says: “I have received
roots hereof from Virginia, (otherwise called Norembega,) which
grow and prosper in my garden as in their own native country.”*
And by the drawing he distinguishes it from the sweet potato.
Mattheolus, also, in his Commentary, speaks of it as having
been first brought,from Virginia to England; and adds that the
Spaniards called it Pappas.t Something to the same purport
is found in the “Universal History of Plants,’ published in
1651. And a century earlier, Cicero says it was cultivated in
Italy. After all, we cannot help thinking that the potato was
probably brought to England from Spain or Italy. To these
countries it has been introduced from the Spanish settlements
in Chili, and had been cultivated there long before it was known
in England. The commercial enterprise of Southern Europe,
and the frequent intercourse of that part of the continent with
England, would casily account for its appearance in the latter
country.

The discoverers found tobacco, Indian corn and potatoes,
erowing at the places they visited. The only one of the three
which impairs the value and shortens the duration of life, be-
came the earlicst favorite; while the potato, which has since
furnished food to millions, was long neglected. Nearly fifty
years after its introduction, the Royal Society began to notice
it with a view to encourage its growth. Not that it had found
its way to their tables unless as a luxury, steeped in wine or
preserved in sugar, as the sweet potato was long before. Their
thought was, that by adding another to the edible vegetables
then in use, they might diminish the danger of famine, an evil of
more frequent occurrence than now. The Royal Society con-
sidered it a desirable lJast resort, little anticipating that it
would become a staple agricultural production. It is not men-
tioned in a review of the state of agriculture in the kingdom
for 1685. Its culture was encouraged in Ireland, on the ground
that it furnished cheap food to poor people, was easily raised,
adapted itself to the climate, and was not fastidious as to soil.§

* Herbal, or Gen. Hist. of Plants, p. 927.

+Mat. Comm. p. 758. { Vol. iii. p. 622.

§ The Gardener’s Kalendar for 1708 says: ‘ The root is very near the nature of
the Jerusalem Artichoke, although not so good and wholesome ; but it may prove

good for swine.

ROOT CROPS. 211

In 1699, Evelyn said, “ Plant potatoes in your poorest land,”
implying that they were undeserving of the best. It was not
till the middle of the last century that the potato was gcnerally
known in England, and its cultivation was rather enforced by
the partial failure of grain. In France, also, strong prejudices
prevailed against its introduction as an article of food—
prejudices that were overcome only by the perseverance of
Parmentier, and the countenance of the king.

We must not suppose that the potato when first carried to
Europe was the same thing that it now is, nor wonder that
people mistook the seed-balls for the part to be eaten. There
was some room for the opposition it encountered. Heriot says
the roots were as large as walnuts, or a little larger; even if
we suppose he meant Enelish walnuts, the size of the potato
would not be very formidable. Capt. Bowles, of the British
navy, says, that in some parts of South America, “it is a com-
mon weed in the garden, but too bitter for use.” Not many
years avo wild potatoes from South America were cultivated
in England and bore an abundant crop, the largest of which
were of the size of a pigeon’s egg, and disagreeably bitter,
while the vines were seven feet long. Scarcely any vegetable
has been more changed by cultivation, both in size and quality.
We can form some idea of the change by recalling to mind what
the long-red was forty or fifty years ago. Farmers raised it
for hogs, and thought the hogs had a hard bargain, so poor and
watery was it. Climate, soils, and improved methods of culti-
vation, have produced changes in the potato, as in many other
vegetables. The rich plum of our gardens is the wild beach
plum improved by culture. Celery, so mild and sweet, is pro-
duced from the coarse, rank smallage. The cherry, in its wild
state, is small, hard and bitter. The potato has passed through
this transforming process. From poor, watery and innutritious,
it has been cultivated into a wholesome, pleasant-tasted and
nourishing article of food; next to wheat, an article of the first
importance to mankind. It combines the advantages of large
yield, easy culture, adaptation to many varieties of soil, and a
great amount of nutritive matter. From no other crop can so
much food be obtained on an acre of land, with the same ex-
pense, except the tropical banana. In no other thing is the

212 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

influence of climate more evident, demonstrating that though
man can dwell in all climates, nothing else can. In the south
of Europe potatoes are less extensively cultivated than in the
north; chiefly because the climate is unfavorable to their
growth, as Louisiana is less suited to their culture than Maine.
Whereas in the south of Europe, Indian corn is raised abundant-
ly, while in the north it is scarcely known. Such facts teach us
the importance of commerce. It not only exchanges the pro-
ductions of different countries, but it transfers fruits, and vegeta-
bles, and flowers, and trees, to places where they are needed,
and where they will flourish. The potato, originating in the
mountains under the equator, has extended its range, north and
south, over a space wider than that occupied by any cereal
grain, and furnishes food for millions of the human race.

2. Its Uses——The influence of different kinds of food upon
the civilization of nations, is a subject that might well engage
our attention. I shall only observe, that as nations advance in
civilization, they require a greater variety of food, and more
skill in its preparation. Savages live on a few articles, and
those imperfectly cooked. Those persons who commend the
superior simplicity of savage fare, and condemn the refinements
of modern living, forget that savages neither live long, nor in-
crease their numbers. Man is an omniverous animal. His
teeth and stomach show that he was made to eat flesh, vegeta-
bles, and fruit; and generally we find that health and comfort
are promoted by a due admixture of all. Neither the Esqui-
maux, who live on animal food, nor the East Indians, who live
chiefly on rice, attain a high development of body or mind.

Ireland may be quoted as an illustration of the social results
of living on one or a few articles of food. We may presume
that, before potatoes were introduced into general use, the Irish
lived, as the English did, on meat and bread; and it is certain
that if the English were to abandon meat and bread, and un-
dertake to live on potatoes, they would incur the same risk of
starving that the Irish do. Even in favorable years there isa
time of six or eight weeks, just before harvest, when the Irish
poor endure intense privation. When a nation is reduced to
one article of food, and that the cheapest, the difficulty is that,
in a bad season, they have nothing to fall back upon—they are

ROOT CROPS. 21

already at the bottom of the hill. Had they lived on meat and
grain, they might have substituted a coarser fare; but there is
no going behind the coarsest. Considering the peculiar social
state of Ireland, and especially the distribution and tenure of
land, the introduction of potatoes can scarcely be regarded as
a blessing. True, doctors disagree. Humboldt says that,
“from time immemorial, no plant has had so decided an influ-
ence on the prosperity of mankind as the potato.” * But Dr.
Smee observes that “the potato is a plant of indolence, and
politically injurious to the community, when extensively em-
ployed. In Ireland it has begotten millions of paupers.”t

Still every one knows that, in ordinary circumstances, pota-
toes are a profitable crop, and that they contain all the mate-
rials requisite for nutrition. Let two acres of land of the same
quality be cultivated, one with potatoes, the other with wheat.
Suppose the potatoes to yield two hundred bushels, weighing
ten thousand pounds; of this weight, one-quarter is solid mat-
ter. We may admit the wheat to yield twenty-five bushels,
weighing fifteen hundred pounds; of this, twelve hundred pounds
will be solid matter. How far these two portions of solid
matter will go towards supporting animal life is not so easily
settled. The potato has nearly as much of nutritious starch as
wheat. It has carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, and lime, for the
development and support of the lungs, muscles, blood and
bones. In gluten it is deficient, and cannot, therefore, undergo
pannary fermentation and forma light loaf. In this respect wheat
flour stands before all other articles of vegetable food ; yet wheat
alone does not appear to be capable of supporting prolonged
human existence in the best health. Perhaps we should be
safe in asserting that, if one man was kept on bread made of
pure, fine wheat flour, and another on good boiled potatoes and
salt, the latter would live longer, and enjoy better health. The
bread is favorable to the increase of strength, and probably,
for a short time, the bread-eater could do the most work, while
the other would have better health, and last longer. Indeed
the best wheat bread is improved by the addition of potatoes,

* New Spain, vol. ii. p. 449. + Smee, on the Potato Plant, p. 160.

214 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

to the amount of one-quarter of its weight—a fact well known
to bakers.

Repeated experiments show that good potatoes, cooked by
boiling, form a nutritive article of food; and that baked pota-
toes are less nourishing than boiled ones. I will mention two,
out of many experiments made in Glasgow prison :—First.
Breakfast, one-half pound oatmeal in porridge, with one-half
pint of buttermilk; dinner, three pounds boiled potatoes, with
salt; supper, five ounces of oatmeal and one-half pint of butter-
milk. Ten prisoners were put upon this diet; they were con-
fined for two months, employed inlight work. At the beginning
of the experiment, eight were in good health, two in indifferent
health. At the end of the time, all were in good health, and
had gained, on an average, more than four pounds, only one
man having lost. The greatest gain was nine pounds four
ounces. The one who lost was reduced five pounds two
ounces.

Another set received the same fare, excepting that the pota-
toes were baked. They were found far less nutritious than the
boiled. The prisoners lost, onan average, one and a half pounds.
The subsequent addition of a quarter of a pound of meat did
not add to their weight.

In the second experiment, ten prisoners were fed thus:
breakfast, two pounds of potatoes boiled; dinner, three pounds;
supper, one pound per man. At the end of two months, the
health of all was good; there was an average gain in weight
of nearly three and a half pounds; the greatest gain, cight and
a quarter pounds; only two losta trifling quantity. The prison-
ers all expressed their satisfaction with this fare, and regretted
the change back to the ordinary diet.

It should be remembered that these experiments were made
upon persons confined only to light labor. Probably potatoes
would not furnish sufficient strength for long continued hard
work in the open air.

Almost all domestic animals are fond of potatoes, and, in
moderate proportions, they are wholesome, if not very nutri-
tive, to cattle and hogs. Almost every farmer has his peculiar
ideas upon this point, gained by his experience. Some of
great experience do not think them profitable, if the expense

ROOT CROPS. 215

of boiling and mashing with meal be taken into account; yet
they admit that they are valuable as an alterative. Loudon,
good authority in England, does not think they are as profit-
able a crop for stock as ruta-bagas, carrots, or turnips; but
opinions differ widely on this point. Low,* Professor of Agri-
culture at Edinburgh, says, that “when boiled, they afford food
ina high degree nourishing and salubrious.” They may be
given to dairy cows, or to any kind of cattle, for the purpose
of fattening; but it is observed that boiled food is not generally
attended with the same benefit to ruminating as to other ani-
mals. To hogs it is given with the best effect. Even Loudon
used to feed horses on potatoes, boiled and mixed with cut hay
and straw, and judged that for this purpose, one acre of pota-
toes went as far as four acres of hay. In Scotland, this kind
of food is given to horses, even when on the hardest work, and
is found both wholesome and economical.

In this stage of our experience, it is impossible to affirm
any thing positively,as to the comparative value of potatoes as
food for cattle. Itis worth while for farmers to repeat and
continue their experiments, keeping accurate accounts of the
expense and the results.

3. Planting.—What ought we to plant? Large potatoes
or small? The whole ora part? Or without reference to
these distinctions? The reason is not evident, or, to say the
least, has not been confirmed by sufficient experiment, why we
should depart from the analogy of other things, which we must
do, if we select for seed the smallest and poorest potatoes.
We purchase, at high prices, the ripest and soundest corn,
wheat and oats. We carefully save that stem of a cabbage
which ripens first. In raising domestic animals, we choose for
parents, the noblest specimens of their respective species.
Deterioration follows a neglect of thisrule. But of late years,
some farmers have chosen small potatoes for seed, and justify
their choice by its results. Itis possible that alarge crop may
be grown from such seed. But has the experiment been tried
on a scale sufficiently large to justify us in laying down a
general rule? One of the most intelligent farmers in this

* Elements of Practical Agriculture, p. 426.

4

216 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

county prefers small seed potatoes, for the reason that they are
less ripe than the largest; that they have a greater power of
reproduction than those which have exhausted their energies
in growing and ripening; and that plants raised from unripe
tubers are earlier and stronger than from over-ripe. If there
is any force in this reasoning, would it not be better to dig the
potatoes intended for seed a little before they are quite ripe,
when the stalk begins to wither, and then to save for planting,
the fairest and largest? These will produce not only larger
potatoes, but a greater number of them.

The best cultivators in England, plant only the finest speci-
mens. Professor Low says, “when proper care is bestowed,
laree and well-shaped tubers are selected for planting.” Von
Thier says, “small tubers have not the same power of germina-
tion as larger ones.” Mr. Knight plants potatoes whole. When
anxious to get the very earliest, he removes all the eyes but
one, that the growing stem may get an abundant support. He
starts that ina hot-bed, and transplants as soon the weather will
allow. By this method, we have known potatoes to be ripened
a fortnight sooner than they could have been ripened by com-
mon field culture. Humboldt calls the cutting of the roots
into small pieces, a bad custom, which occasions degeneracy.
But for main crops, Mr. Knight cuts large potatoes, probably
from regard to economy, while others of equal celebrity, insist
that it is better to plant the tuber whole. Some think one eye
sufficient, on the principle that the strength of the stem will
depend, at the outset, on the piece planted from which it
derives its nutriment. This would forbid the planting all the
seed; for where a great number of eyes shoot up together, the
stems must be weak. And where the stems are weak and
crowded, we may expect a small crop of small roots. It is
well known that eyes from the seed end of the tuber furnish
the earliest crop, especially if one eye only is left upon the
whole root.

The plant forms tubers until the flowers appear; after that
time it ripens them. Some cultivators infer from these facts,
that if you would have the fruit ripen early, you must remove
the flowers and flower-stocks, that none of the energies of the
plant may be expended in ripening the seed. Mr. Knight

‘

ROOT CROPS. 2177.

asserts, that cutting off the blossoms also increases the yield.
He puts the additional yield up to the high figure of one ton to
the acre. The early formation of the tubers is said to delay
the blooming; while the blooming and the ripening of seed
delay the growth of the tubers. Hence the practice of com-
pelling some early kinds to produce blossoms and seeds
contrary to their habits, namely to remove the tubers from the
hill as they are being formed. By this means all the energies
of the plant are concentrated upon the stem and the organs of
fructification, and blossoms and seeds are produced.

The time of planting, the quantity of seed, the kind of soil,
the amount and quality of manure, the method of culture and
preservation, are all worthy of special notice; but the limits
assigned to this essay forbid us to enter upon them.

4, Diseases.—All other disorders to which potatoes are
liable, are overlooked in the presence of the modern rot. A
disorder so wide spread and so destructive has, of course, at-
tracted the attention of practical and scientific men in many
countries; and all the resources of learning and skill have been
applied to the investigation of its causes, and its remedies, hith-
erto, with small success. At least they have only shown, not
what the cause is, but what it is not. The universality of the
evil proves that it could not have been occasioned by blight,
insects, climate or soils; for it is not to be supposed that these
were everywhere, and, at the same time, cooperating to one
end. Besides, these causes existed long ago, and did not pro-
duce the results we now witness. As to insects and fungi, they
may be regarded rather as effects, than as causes of the dis-
ease. A true theory must account for all phenomena, and a
true remedy reach all similar cases. In both points recent
researches have signally failed; and from various quarters we
learn that investigations are abandoned in despair of attaining
a satisfactory solution of the difficulty.

Iam not disposed to increase the number of unsuccessful
physicians; but shall only suggest a few thoughts respecting
the proximate causes or aggravations of the disorder. I sup-
pose they are nearest to the right, who consider the continued,
propagation of the plant without renewal from it original
climate and soil, and its over-stimulation by strong manure, as,

28*

218 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

+ .

at least, secondary, or auxiliary causes of itsdecay. We should
not forget that the plant we cultivate is not the original potato
in its native home, where it doubtless preserves its health from
age to age, like other wild inhabitants of the forest. Scarcely
any foreign plant has been subjected to a discipline so severe ;
to methods of culture so different from what nature appointed
for this. For some purposes we have changed it for the bet-
ter; for instance, in the quantity and quality of its tubers—
making them not only an abundant but palatable article of food.
But this result may have been attained at the expense of health.
Not that the potato is actually running out and is about to die.
That seldom occurs to any plants, and especially unlikely is it
to occur to those propagated only by seeds; although they may
and do degenerate to such an extent as to render their cultiva-
tion unprofitable. And this process is hastened by modes of
culture different from those by which the plant naturally propa-
gates itself. In its wild state, the potato produces small tubers
and long tops. We have increased the fruit and diminished the
amount of stems and leaves—an operation that may have occa-
sioned a great change in its constitutional condition. The
energies of the plant are withdrawn from its own nutrition and
determined towards the production of fruit to such a degree as
to cause its debilitation and decay—an effect with which we
are familiar in fruit trees. In a temperate, mountainous coun-
try, it probably continues to live in high health. But it has
been transported to every variety of climate and of soil, and
excessively, and of course, unnaturally, stimulated for the sake
of large crops. We know the effects produced on some other
plants by a similar course. Ifa pear tree is over-stimulated,
the new wood will not ripen. If wheat is over-stimulated by
animal manure, the stalk is rank, tender, liable to rust, and
bears no fruit, or very little. Some garden vegetables, so
treated, disappoint our hopes altogether. Why may not similar-
ly unfavorable results occur in potatoes, by pursuing a course
of treatment so foreign from that which nature observes? Why
are potato plants grown on a good but unmanured soil, less
liable to rot than others? Because, in this respect, they are
situated more like the wild plant. Excessive stimulation by
manure increases the amount of cellular texture, and makes the

ROOT CROPS. 219

tuber softer and more spongy—and hence more subject to
decay; more likely to be affected by unfavorable atmospheric
conditions. And when this course of unnatural treatment is
continued for two centuries, it is not strange that, although the
amount of yield is increased, it may be done by undermining
the health, and perhaps diminishing the vitality of the plant.
Probably nature has limits beyond which her perversion cannot
be carried with impunity.

Besides, in its wild state, the potato propagates itself by
seeds as well as by tubers. From recently grown seeds, it
annually renews its youth and health. And wild plants, which
reproduce themselves without human aid, resist tendencies to
disease better than cultivated ones. But we have checked the
potato in its habit of reproduction from seed, because we
wanted an increased yield of tubers—a result attainable, in
part, by preventing the plant from following out its natural
tendency to produce seed. We gain in one direction, and lose
in another.

It has often been suggested, that we might, perhaps, recruit
the failing health of the potato, by raising it from seed; and
experience teaches us, that potatoes so raised are usually best
for the table. But scedlings rot as much as potatoes raised
from tubers. Whynot? They come from the sced of diseased
tubers. The seed partakes of the general deterioration.
Whatever may have been the primary cause of the disease, it
has infected the whole plant. And raising from seed neither
invigorates the vegetative principle, nor checks the tendency to
decay. There is a defective constitution, the vitality of which
cannot beso restored. The disease is a constitutional debility,
resulting from the unnatural circumstances in which the potato
is placed, analogous to readily acknowledged causes of decay
in other plants. Some kinds do not rot much; others are
almost destroyed; and all kinds are more or less affected.
Some may have been cultivated for a shorter time than others,
and now have a sounder health. We may also be ignorant of
some conditions, which, besides long-continued and unnatural
cultivation, may be requisite to produce the result. Where it
is so difficult to pronounce positively upon the primary cause
of the disease, may we not be justified, in the absence of

/

'220 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

-”

any other tolerable theory, in regarding the result as proof of
deterioration ?

Does it not favor this theory, that potatoes planted on light,
dry, and especially on new land, are less liable to rot, than on
heavy, wet, and manured land? It is reasonable that this
should be so, because the former condition is an approximation
to that of the original plant. Potatoes thus grown will produce
a smaller stem and fewer leaves, and though the tubers may
also be small, they will be good flavored. In the new and fer-
tile land on the bayous of Louisiana, the tubers are said to be
as large and as good flavored, as dry and nutritious, as any
raised elsewhere. From Bermuda also are brought our best
early potatoes. If such a culture will not restore health, it
may cause the disorder to assume a milder form. And while
the whole subject is environed with doubt, and the origin of the
disorder has baffled the sagacity of the wisest phytologists, we
may well speak with modesty of remedies. But there seems
to be reason in planting either on new land, or on light land,
enriched with straw, clover, leaf, or other vegetable manure.
Whatever manures be used, the land should be light and dry,
and easily accessible by the sun.*

Great care should also be exercised in selecting and planting
the finest varieties of seedlings. Nor should it be forgotten
that too much importance has been attached to the transporta-
tion of potatoes for planting to localities distant from those in
which they grew. The gain from that practice will hardly pay
the expense. Scedlings adapt themselves to their home, and
do as well there as elsewhere.

But it seems to me that our chief hope of success lies in
planting potatoes and seed brought directly from their native
country and their wild state. Even should it be true, as it has

* It may be in place here to inquire whether a part of the failure of the potato
crop may not have resulted from the slovenly manner in which this plant is fre-
quently cultivated. We plough once, throw into a hole some strong manure, and
press upon it the half-pulverized earth. Heavy rains beat down the ground, and
render it so solid as to be almost inaccessible to atmospheric influence. If the
ground were ploughed deep, then cross-ploughed, then harrowed and made fine
and light, so that the sun, air, and rain might have free access to the plants, there
is reason to believe that the increase of the quantity and the improvement of the
quality, of the crop, would repay the additional expense,

ROOT CROPS. 221

been sometimes asserted, that such a course is not absolutely
certain to be successful; yet it is much more likely to be so
than any hitherto proposed. We can thus start anew; and
with the multiplied facilities of science, and with hosts of intel-
ligent farmers and gardeners, we may, in a comparatively short
time, restore this important plant to its former health and pro-
ductiveness. It is the duty of those having the means and
opportunities, to use them in a work so intimately connected
with the pecuniary and social prosperity of the people. Nor
would it be improper for the government of the United States
to instruct its diplomatic agents to institute inquiries, and to
make personal examinations touching this subject, in other
countries. It is said* that there are some kinds of potatoes
cultivated in South America superior for table use to any known
among us.

We have heard that distinguished agriculturists in this
county have received and planted wild potatoes from New
Mexico. We have read also in the Patent Office Reports, state-
ments that wild potatoes, or what have been thought to be such,
have recently been found in that part of the country. It is
well to receive this latter account with caution. Humboldt,
and other eminent botanists, assert, that the potato is indigenous
only in Chili; yet recently it has been said that wild potatoes
have been discovered in Peru.t Certainly they have never
before been found in North America. There are many plants
with tuberous roots, and inaccurate observers may possibly
have mistaken some of these for potatoes.

In conclusion, I would observe that the potato disease will
answer at least one good purpose “if it compels us to extend
our knowledge to other kinds of food, which have been till now
either unknown or unappreciated.” Is not our prejudice against
new things inconsistent with our general enterprise? Perhaps
rice, sazo, tapioca, and oatmeal, would not furnish a complete
substitute for potatoes; but, with a genius for cookery, they
might be worth more than we now make them. One-third of
all the people on earth are mainly supported on rice. Would
not that be a good fashion which should bring it into more

* Sabine, Lond. Hor. Soc. Trans., vol. v. p. 249.
+ Lambert’s Journal of Science and Arts, yol. x.

222 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

common use among us? Motives of patriotism might unite
‘with those of economy. There is a tradition that, in the early
times of Massachusetts, the people agreed to use salt fish for
dinner one day in the week, as an encouragement to the fisher-
man. Salt fish dinners on Saturday still commemorate the fact.
It is easy to imagine how rice might be more extensively used in
our domestic economy; and that we might find it both palatable
and profitable. The introduction into general use of a new
vegetable would render us less dependent on present supplies,
and cause less regret for the failure of any, however important.

The following table has been prepared by the Hon. John
Brooks, of Princeton, designed to show the cost of the cultiva-
tion of carrots, as reported in several successive years in the
Worcester Transactions :—

ROOT CROPS. 223

TAL Blu Bie

Date. NAME. Rods. Tons. Cost. Cost. ip oma
per Ton. | per Rod.

1846 | Harvey Dodge, ‘ 2 | 46 5.48 | $20 00 | $8 G4 | 274.40
1847 | Willard Earle, : 40 3.97 | 20 50} 5 16 | 198.75
1847 | Harvey Dodge, 4 e485 6.27 | 21 70 | 3 46 | 299.49
1847 | P. H. Perrin, a . | 40 4.84 | 23 80 | 4 91 | 242.20
1848 | Harvey Dodge, . - | 80 12.91 | 49 92 | 3 86 | 322.87
1848 | William S. Lincoln, ail) 43.75 5.35 | 20 81 | 3 88 | 244.48

1848 | William A. Wheeler, . | 160 25.27 | 120 25 | 4 75 | 315.93

1849 | Harvey Dodge, . ~ | 125 15.60 | 80 06 | 5 13 | 249.60
1849 | William S. Lincoln, -| 40 4.62 | 2179 | 4 71 | 230.70

1849 | William A. Wheeler. . | 160 26.66 | 153 17 | 5 74 | 333 28
1850 | Harvey Dodge, . - | 232 18.96 | 86 77 | 4 57 | 163.46

1850 | William S. Lincoln, aiken 8.82 | 67 59 | 7 65 | 147.04
1850 | Charles White, : «| 80 8.70 | 54 25 | 6 23 | 217.50
1850 | B. N. Child, . : - | 40 5.77 | 25 62 | 4 44 | 288.75
1852 | Jonathan Warren, . -(\, 80 11.50 |} 59 00} 5 13 | 287.50
1852 | Samuel Perry, Pe ol: 22.95 | 92 50] 4 03 | 286.87
1852 | Harvey Dodge, . ~ | 101.7 | 1422) 6710] 4 75 | 277.82
1853 | Thomas W. Ward,. ml (ay eA 6.84 | 59 50 | 8 69 | 188.13
1853 | Harvey Dodge, . - | 120 13.35 | 45 87 | 3 43 | 222.50
1853 | Jonathan Warren, . ih tell) 9 48 00 | 5 33 | 225.

Average cost per ton, $4.97; produce, per rod, 250.81 lbs.; average crop,
per acre, 40,129 lbs.; 20.06 tons per acre: 6.2 cents per bushel of 50 pounds,
nearly.

Ten largest crops, average, 293.60 lbs. per rod—average cost per ton, $4 48.4
Ten smallest “ Be 07.or lbs 6 es o 5 45.6

$9 94.0
$4 97.0

224 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

a

ESSEX.

Seven entries for premium were made. They have not had
an opportunity of examining any of the crops at any stage of
their progress, not having been notified of any entries being
made until called together to examine the several statements
of the applicants for premium. They do not consider them-
selves as well qualified for the discharge of their duty as if they
had seen the crops during their growth.

They have endeavored to examine the several statements
with care, and see no reason to doubt their fairness and truth,
as none of them exceeds what might be reasonably expected
ona rich soil with the best cultivation. But they are of opinion
that, in all like cases, a certificate of the measurement of the
land, and of the measure and weight of the crop, should accom-
pany the statement.

DEAN Rosinson, Chairman.

J. Longfellows’ Statement.

The crop of onions which I entered for premium has now
been harvested, and I herewith transmit the result. From one-
half acre of land measured by G. W. Adams, I have taken 3862
baskets of ripe onions. I weighed six baskets, the heaviest
weighing fifty-nine, the lightest fifty-seven pounds, I call them
fifty-seven. One-half of the land has been in onions three years ;
the remainder one year, except about eight rods, on which
onions have not been sown until last spring. The crop last
year was very much injured by the grub worm, and considera-
ble of the ground was set over with cabbage. The land isa
dark, sandy loam, and was not ploughed at all last spring. It
was liberally manured with a compost of meadow muck and
stable manure, and about five bushels of salt and five bushels
of wood ashes to the acre, and well worked with the cultivator,
harrow and hand-rake. The seed (Danvers yellow) was sown
about the first of May, three and a half pounds to the acre.
The ashes were sown after the seed.

I have not kept an accurate account of the cost of manure
and labor on this piece of land, but suppose it cost me as much

ROOT CROPS. 225

as the same would cost any other man, say seventy-five dollars
for manure, labor and interest on land. My crop is sold at
sixty cents per bushel, delivered at the depot, one and a half
miles from my place of residence.

This is to certify that I assisted in harvesting, topping,
measuring and weighing, the above lot of onions, and that the
above statement is correct.

EpwIn VANCE.
Byrretp, November 7, 1853.

I hereby certify that I measured the ground cultivated as
above stated, and it contains one-half acre and no more.

Gro. W. ADAMS.

Newsury, November 7, 1853.

Statement of Ephraim Brown.

Statement of quantity of onions, ruta-baga turnips and car-
rots, raised on one-half acre of land to each crop, viz. :—

407 bushels onions, fifty pounds to the bushel. —
260 © turnips, sixty “ “- i
41,400 pounds carrots, or twenty tons two quarters, and four
hundred pounds.

The land on which the above were raised has been planted
with root crops and squashes the three past years, and has been
manured liberally with compost of rotten kelp, meadow mud
and barn manure. The crops have been carefully cultivated—
all weeds kept down. The soil is a strong black loam on the
Marblehead Neck.

Marpienrap, November 16, 1853.

WORCESTER.

From the Report of the Committee.

The entries for premiums on roots the present ycar, were
less than those of last year, and confined exclusively to carrots,
no entries for potatoes having been made, owing, undoubtedly,
to the prevalence of the potato rot, in the early part of
autumn.

29*

226 © MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

a

Only four entries of carrots were made, and one of these
was withdrawn after the committee had examined it. This
was rather a matter of regret to them, inasmuch as the com-
petitor is one of the pioneers in the cultivation of the carrot
crop, and received the highest premium awarded by the society,
for his crop of last year. They were desirous of having his
statement, though his crop was undoubtedly much smaller than
that of last year, as much that is valuable may sometimes be
learned from an unsuccessful effort. The three competitors on
carrots, who made returns to the secretary, were Thomas W.
Ward, of Shrewsbury; Harvey Dodge, of Sutton, and Jonathan
Warren, of Grafton.

Had the committee been at liberty to award a premium for
the most minute and accurate return of the expense of raising
the crop; the condition of the land on which it was grown, and
all the material facts relative to it, they would have given Mr.
Ward the first premium. But being restricted to a certain
amount of land, and to a certain weight of roots on that land,
in order to entitle competitors to any premium, and Mr. Ward
falling short of the specified amount, in both of these particu-
lars, he is not entitled to any premium.

By his statement, which follows, it will be seen that, although
unsuccessful as a competitor for the society’s premiums, he has
nevertheless demonstrated the important fact that a net profit
of $29.46 was obtained from the seventy-two and three-fourths
square rods of ground on which his carrots were grown, against
nine hundred and nineteen pounds of hay, which was the entire
pro rata product of the same picce of land last year. Mr.
Ward estimated his carrots at only $10 dollars a ton, whereas
Mr. Dodge sold his on the ground at $12 per ton.

Statement of Thomas W. Ward.

Herewith you have a statement of the carrot crop, entered
by me for the society’s premium. You will see by the certifi-
cates that 1 am minus both in quantity of land and crop. I
thought, however, that I would make “due return,” and abide
the default.

The crop was much more even where the perfectly rotted
manure was put, than it was where the compost from under the

ROOT CROPS. - oo

barn was spread. The roots, where the latter manure was put,
were some of them very large and long—others were small;
some were very sprangling and uncomely in shape. I think
there was more weight of roots from the same quantity of
ground where the fine manure was used, than where the cellar.
manure was put.

In calculating the value of the crop, I reckoned forty-six
pounds to the bushel, which I ascertained by measuring one
load which was weighed, and then cast them at thirty cents per
bushel, which is what they are sold at in this place, which, if I
am right, will bring them at about 6, mills per pound.

My loads of roots were nearly of the same size, but they
varied exceedingly in weight, according to the size of the roots.
The load which I measured was of medium sized root.

The land in 1852, was in grass, and the product of bay was
at the rate of one ton to the acre. In 1845, the land was well
manured and cropped with corn; in 1846, it was cropped with
oats and seeded with clover and herds-grass seed, since which
time it has been mowed, receiving no manure till last spring,
at which time, nine cart-loads (of twenty-five bushels) were
applied to it—one-half the droppings of the cattle, and one-
half loam or muck, composted in the barn cellar, and nine cart-
loads of compost manure from the yard of summer manure,
made of muck, loam, refuse hay, and the droppings of cows
while yarded in summer. The sward was turned on the 3lst
day of May, with No. 33 sod and subsoil plough of Ruggles,
Nourse, Mason & Co.’s manufacture, which worked most admi-
rably. The manure was then spread and harrowed in, and then
the ground was thoroughly brushed with a bush harrow—
nothing more was done. I used one pound and a half
of orange carrot seed. It was sown June 3d, with a seed-
sower which was old and not suitable, as I found before I had
finished sowing. Hoed and began to weed, first time, about
June 28th; July 11th, gave them the second weeding; August 2d,
weeded a third time, and August 11th, went through them with
ahoe. Gathered them from October 29th to November 4th,
inclusive. I ploughed near to the row and then drew the
root with the hand,

228 ° MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

Ploughing three-fourths of a day—two men and two
yoke of oxen—equal to 14 day for one man and the
same for one yoke of oxen; carting and spreading
manure, harrowing and brushing—two days for one
man and one yoke of oxen—calling a day of ox work
equal to a day of man’s work, you have, for one man,

in preparing the ground, . ‘ : -- . ‘Tdays
Sowing the seed, one man,half a day, . j 1) oe
In all, fifteen days for one man in weeding and hoeing, 15 «
Tn all, fourteen days for one man’s harvesting, . yl
Two and a half day’s work of oxen, ploughing out
and carting carrots, . ‘ : : : , 24s
Totallabor, . - 39 days

For seed, $1.50—Manure, (the ground retaining half
the value,) $9.25, . F ; F ii. $10 575
For 39 days’ cultivating and harvesting, . 48 75

Total value of crop, 13,687 pounds of carrots,
at 64 mills per pound, . : : ; eaPsS oe

Surewssury, November 5, 1853.

Mr. Dodge, of Sutton, entered two lots of carrots for pre-
mium; one containing a quarter and the other half an acre.
His crop on the quarter weighing only 9,250 pounds, will not
entitle him to a premium, as the rules of the society require
the weight of roots on that amount of land to be ten thousand
pounds. On the half acre entered by Mr. Dodge, it will be
seen by his statement which follows, that he raised 17,450
pounds of carrots ata pro rata cost of $30.58, yielding thereby
anet profit of $72.12, on a single half acre of land.

Mr. Dodge, either from his long experience in growing root
crops, or from some other cause, seems to have acquired the
faculty of raising carrots with less expense than other people.
It will be seen by comparing the statements of the three com- -
petitors the present year, that Mr. Dodge cultivated three-
quarters of an acre at an expense of $45.87 only; whereas
Mr. Ward cultivated only seventy-two and three-fourths square
rods of ground, being seven and one-fourth rods less than half

ROOT CROPS. 229

“an acre, at an expense of $59.50. The cost of cultivating
the half acre entered by Mr. Warren, as stated by him, was
$48. The committee state these facts here, hoping that the _
difference in the expense of cultivation, as shown by the above
statements, will induce those interested in the raising of root
crops, to investigate the cause of so great apparent discrep-
ancy.

Statement of Harvey Dodge.

I herewith hand you a more condensed statement of the ex-
pense and product of the two lots of carrots grown on my,
farm in Sutton, the present season. As the cultivation was the
same on both lots, both being manured alike as near as possible,
I propose condensing the cost of cultivating the two lots into
one form, believing that I shall be understood if I show the
products of the two separately, as the lots were surveyed and
the products of each kept by itself as will be seen below.

Expense of crop on one-fourth and one-half acre :—
Two hundred bushels of leached ashes, at 6}

cents, 7 i ; . $12 50
Three Satibslinid: man aia a pair of horses,. 6 00
Bush harrowing, same team, . : 2 75
One and a half pound of seed at 75 denied ROE WES
Sowing same with machine, . ; : 50

Boy’s labor 23 days, weeding and caliivad aay
at 50 cents per day, . : : : J TbtoG

Three men, three days, digging carrots, snporar OO
Three boys, three days, cutting tops and tend-
ing teams, . 3 : : : : . 4 50
$45 87

Value of crop :—
9,250 pounds on the one-fourth acre, sold for

$12 per ton, . , . $55 50
17,450 pounds on the one- half acre, cae on
the lot for the same, . : : : . 104 70
160 20

Net ipoehh yi alriyiio Visio lgotie ule k boty 4 Soe

230 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

a

The committee will notice that I have not added interest of
land to the bills of expense, which is worth $300 per acre for
agricultural purposes, which would amount to $13.67. Against
this I put the tops, which are a valuable feed for stock, worth
$5, and the balance of interest I think the committee will agree
should go against the growth of fifty young apple trees of
three and seven years growth.

The method of cultivating has been about the same the
present season, that I have recommended for the last ten years,
namely, deep and clean culture, and all the work to be done
while the sun shines. No weeding or hoeing should be permit-
ted in wet weather, or while the dew is on, as it always in-
creases weeds. A hand cultivator has been used by me for the
first time, this season, and with marked advantage; I think it
saves twenty per cent. of all the labor. I take the present
opportunity to say that I have changed my mind in relation to
thinning the crop; afew rows being left and not thinned out at
all, gave more weight than those thinned to stand two inches
apart. In regard to using leeched ashes for manure, I have
had but little experience until this year. Having used about
one thousand bushels on my root crop this year, I know
nothing of the effect they will have on the land in years to
come. The crop was much more free from weeds than in for-
mer years, when compost or stable manure was used, and the same
remarks can with safety be made in regard to grubs and worms,
which have of late years become very troublesome, owing, no
doubt, to the indulgence of farmers in permitting idle boys and
sometimes would-be men, to huntand destroy a large share of the
feathered tribe, which a wise Providence evidently intended to
aid us in destroying worms and insects. Have we not a right,
as well as the mechanic, to write on our gate posts, No
admittance without a permit ?

Surron, November 8th, 1853.

Mr. Jonathan Warren, of Grafton, entered half an acre, upon
which, it will be seen, he raised three hundred and sixty bush-
els of carrots. He produced a weigher’s certificate, stating
that eighty bushels of them weighed 4,016 pounds. In that
proportion, if the eighty bushels which were weighed were an

ROOT CROPS. 231

average weight of the whole crop, the three hundred and sixty
bushels would have weighed 18,072 pounds; being 3,072 more
than the minimum weight required by the rules of the society,
to entitle him toa premium. The committee had no other
means of arriving at the entire weight of his crop, than by
applying the rule of proportion as above. It will also be seen
that the total value of his crop was $93, and the cost of rais-
ing $48, leaving a net profit of $45 on his half acre.

Statement of Jonathan Warren.

The lot on which the crop of carrots which I enter for pre-
mium was grown, contains one-half acre. The lot was grass
land, and ploughed in May, 1852, and had been mowed ten
years. It was planted with corn in 1852, and sixty loads to
the acre of horse and hog manure applied to it, and produced
sixty-five bushels of corn to the acre. The land was in good
condition in the spring of 1853; eleven loads barnyard ma-
nure were applied to it, and the ground was ploughed twice,
harrowed and bushed afterwards. Jused one anda half pound of
seed which was sown June 8th; weeded three times; com-
menced harvesting November Ist and finished the 5th. The
amount of product was three hundred and sixty bushels.

Amount of labor performed :—

Preparing ground, . : : : : ; 21 days.
Sowing, . : . : . ‘ : : 41 4
Weeding, . ‘ ; : : . - ot FG
Harvesting, 3 ‘ : : : é . ) Oh Ae

Total. .. : : ‘ : : + hale, Calpe

Expense of sced, manure and labor of cultivation, . $48 00
Value of carrots, 3 ; ; : : $90 00
o tops, . . ; : ; ; 3 00

93 00

$45 00

The committee visited a number of lots of carrots besides
those entered for premiums, among which was that of William

232 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

S. Lincoln. He raised a fine crop for this season, and it was
the opinion of a majority of the committee, judging from the
appearance of his carrots as compared with others before they
were harvested, that if Mr. Lincoln, the farmer, had made an
entry of his carrots with Mr. Lincoln the recording secretary
of the society, he would have had more than an even chance
for a premium.

William T. Merrifield, of Worcester, raised a crop upon the
same piece of ground upon which he raised a very large crop
last year; but owing to the severe blight with which the carrot
crop was very generally afflicted in this vicinity the present
year he did not obtain half the amount which he raised on the
same ground last year.

Two of the committee examined a crop belonging to William
A. Wheeler, of Worcester, upon which he also raised a very
heavy crop last year. Mr. Wheeler’s theory is, that in order
to grow carrots successfully, the ground should be worked very
deeply, thereby obtaining, as he thinks, a greater lenzth of root,
and consequently a greater weight from the same amount of land.
He caused his ground this year to be spaded to the depth of
two fect or more; but his crop of carrots was very small, and
much shorter than the average of those examined by the com-
mittee. His crop suffered from the drought in the early part
of the season, and the tops were smitten with a blast in the
month of September.

The field of carrots entered by Capt. Samuel Perry, of Wor-
cester, suffered severely from the blight which came upon them
in the latter part of September. The principal portion of his
field was sown during the last week of May. A small patch in
the same field was not sown, for some cause, until late in July.
The carrots on this piece were very large, and the tops not in
the least affected by the blast. The inference from these facts
would seem to be, that if the whole field had not been sown
until July, there would have been a much larger crop the pres-
ent season at least; but whether the same result would occur
again in one year out of ten, is quite uncertain.

From all the examinations which the committee have made,
and from the best information they have been able to obtain
from those most experienced in the culture of the carrot crop,

ROOT CROPS. 233

they are fully persuaded that it is not advisable to thin out the
carrots as many do, in the early part of the season. Very
large carrots are not desirable for the reason that they are
generally either hollow in the centre, or else consist of a hard
woody substance, which renders them much less nutritious than
those of a medium size, yielding, also, a less weight on a given
portion of ground.

WarrEN LAzeLL, Chairman.

WORCESTER WEST.
Statement of George H. Lee.

Potato—lI hereby certify that from one acre of ground, the
present season, I have harvested three hundred and forty-five
bushels of potatoes. The sward was turned early in the spring,
as soon as the frost would admit, and immediately planted on
the top of the furrow, in drills. They were hoed twice. Pre-
vious to the first time they were plastered. The variety is
called the Holland potato.

Barre, November 5, 1853.

Statement of John T. Ellsworth.

Carrots.—I had sixty-four rods of ground, on which I raised
three hundred and seventy-four bushels, or eighteen thousand
seven hundred and nine pounds. On forty rods I had two
hundred and thirty-eight bushels, or eleven thousand nine
hundred and forty pounds. A corner of the lot was damaged
very much by the grasshopper and woodcock. As the rest
yielded, there would have been in the whole lot twenty bushels
more. I drew fifteen loads of stable manure on the lot, in two
piles. It laid three weeks, when I turned the manure over and
ploughed the land as deep as I could. The 16th May I sowed
them, using the eagle plough to open the drills, and having the
oxen go twice in a place as nearly as possible, leaving the land
in drills. I then spread the manure in the furrows quite plenty,
and with the same team split the drills so as to raise a drill
directly on the manure. I then used a hand rake to brush the

30*

234 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

stones and lumps off, if any. Before using the rake I ran a
hand-roll over it to bed and settle it so that the seed sown
would work well. I took the two corner teeth out of my cul-
tivator, and used it with a horse. The rows would average
about twenty-two inches apart. I calculated to sow them
about three inches apart.

In digging I ploughed by the side of them, deep, and close to
the roots so as to see them, and could then pull them up with
ease. The roots were so large it was very fast harvesting.

Expenses of crop :—

Ploughing the land, : : Pape Meee (0,
Fifteen loads of manure—ten of eaten ie car-
rot crop, : : o> LO OG

Opening and covering ville BEE eine manure
in drills, raking, rolling, and sowing seed, . 7 00

Carrot seed, : : 3 oy ee He
Drawing manure to lot and ae heap, i) oe
Cultivating as soon as could see the plant, . 50
Cultivating and weeding, first time, : er 8)
Cultivating and weeding and thinning, . 2 ae
Pulling large weeds and cultivating, . : 50
Harvesting crop, . : 3 : : ee
Interest on land, . : ; ‘ : AS. Sik
—— $41 37
Credit to land :—
Three hundred and seventy-four bushels of
carrots, . : : : : : . $93 50
Carrot tops, : : : : : he ENO
95 00

Balance to crop, . : 5 : ‘ - $03 63

The land was about one-half sown three years, the rest two
years in rotation.

I sold some of the roots at twenty-five cents, and think the
remainder are worth that to me to feed.

Cost of carrots, a trifle over eleven cents per bushel.

Harpwick, November 28, 1853.

ROOT CROPS. 235

Statement of Joseph Robinson.

The crop of carrots I offer for premium was six hundred and .
sixty-six bushels, grown upon one hundred and twenty-nine square
rods of ground, which has been sown with carrots the last four
years. Ihave spread yearly twelve loads of heap manure, and
ploughed it in about the middle of May. Ploughed the ground
once, cultivated twice, and then bushed the ground for sowing.
Sowed the carrots the last week in May, the rows about six
inches apart, with a seed-sower; hoed three times, and har-
vested last of October.

Cr.

Six hundred and sixty-six bushels carrots, at
twenty-five cents, . : 4 : 7 $166 50

Dr.
Manure, : : $12 00
Ploughing, cultivating, &e., E 7 OO
Sowing and seed, . ; ‘ F ‘ a2 S00
Hoeing, . : : : . : 3/3 L600
Digeing, 8 00

$43 00

WORCESTER NORTH.

Statement of Isaac B. Woodward.

Carrots——The ground was manured with four loads of green
manure, on the 6th of May, and ploughed in. It was ploughed
deeper on the 17th, and the carrots were sown on the 18th of
May, in rows, about fifteen inches apart. They were hoed
three times during the summer, and were dug about the first of
November. The amount grown on an average square rod was
357% pounds, making 17,1521 pounds or 143,15 bushels to the
eighth, or 1,144.8 bushels to the acre.

The same field has been sown with carrots for three years,
and has been manured nearly the same every year.

The cost of cultivation was as follows :—

Manure, ab be : : ; 4 . : $4 00
Ploughing, twice, . ; ; > ; 5 5 1 00

236 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

a

Raking and sowing, : : : : ; : $0 33
Hoeing, three times, . : : : ] ; 3 00
Harvesting, . é ; ° ; : é ‘ 3 00

RG eRRUU NN sed fact stn ad tive lek Tbe) Adteds iu Ce ae

This lot contained one-eighth of an acre. On another lot of
the same size there were 347 pounds to the square rod, which
is at the rate of 1384 bushels to the eighth, or 1,110 bushels to
the acre.

Statement of Leonard Day.

Carrots.—The ground was ploughed in the fall, and again in
the spring; the ground prepared and the carrots sown about
the last of April. The amount grown on eighty-four rods was
six hundred and fifty bushels.

Cost of cultivation as follows :—

Two ploughings, . : : ; ‘ d : $2 00

Preparing the ground, . F : : , 4 1 50
Sowing, , ‘ : : : ; : : 50
Weeding twice. : : : : é : 6 00
Harvesting, . ; - é : : : : 25 00
$40 00

HAMPSHIRE.

Statement of O. and F. H. Williams.

Carrots.—The half acre of carrots which we enter for pre-
mium is a sandy loam. Part of it was in carrots last year, and
the remainder has been in grass for twenty years. We
ploughed with a Michigan plough, eight inches deep, and
planted in rows from eighteen to twenty inches apart.

Value of crop :—
348 bushels, at 25 cents, . : : ; : $87 00
Expenses :—
Ploughing, . : ; ; ; ' ; $1 25
Harrowing, : : ; : ; : 15

ROOT CROPS.

Manure, ten loads,

Carting and spreading,

Planting with corn- peategs in dill,

Three-fourths of a pound of seed,

Ploughing with small cast steel plough, weigh-
ing twenty-five pounds, and thinning,

Second time with plough,

Harvesting,

Net profit,

SUNDERLAND, October 26, 1853.

237

$28 50

$58 50

Turnips.—The half acre of turnips which we enter for pre-
mium is asandyloam. The land has been in grass for the last
three years. We turned the sward under the 5th of July, after
taking off a crop of grass, and cutting the furrows from seven

to eight inches deep.

Value of crop :—
250 bushels at 20 cents,

Expenses :—
Ploughing, .
Harrowing,
Bight loads of nedena st
Carting and spreading,
Sowing with corn- pa in drills,
Half a pound of seed,
Hocing and thinning,
Ploughing with light cast sive alone mes
ing twenty-five pounds,
Harvesting,

Net profit,

SuNDERLAND, November 5, 1853.

$50 00

$1 25

238 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

a

NORFOLK.

From the Report of the Committee.

The cultivation of vegetables in our county is greatly stimu-
lated by our proximity to the metropolis, and the large towns
in its vicinity. No branch of husbandry proves so profitable as
this, where it is conducted by intelligence and experience.
There are many instances in this county of large families raised,
educated, provided with patrimonies, vigorous health, and
habits of industry, from the operations of vegetable culture.
The sales from a dozen acres of highly cultivated land, devoted
to garden vegetables, will exceed the income of several large
farms cultivated in the ordinary way. The market is never
overstocked, and often its deficiencies are supplied from distant
States. Success in this calling depends on knowledge; and an
apprenticeship to a skilful vegetable gardener is a pursuit
worthy the attention of our young men.

JAMES M. Rossins, Chairman.

Statement of Isaac H. Meserve.

The ground on which I raised carrots this year, and offer for
a premium, measured one acre, of a light loamy soil; I spread,
Jast spring, about four cords of compost of hog manure and
meadow muck; ploughed it twice; harrowed and sowed on a
level surface the 24th of May, with a seed-sower; I weeded
them three times; I commenced harvesting the 5th of Novem-

ber; the acre produced eighteen tons.

Expenses :—
Four cords manure, . : : ; f $16 00
Ploughing and harrowing, : § : 6 00
Sowing and seed, . 5 : 5 : 2 50
Weeding, &e., . : : : : ; 10 00
Harvesting, &c., ; 5 ; , : 7 00

$41 50

Value of crop :—

Eighteen tons carrots, at $12, . s A : . 216 O00

Net profit, , : : , , ; . $174 50

ROOT CROPS. 239

The work was mostly done by the inmates belonging to the
institution, but I have charged for their labor about what I
think would be the cost.

Broox Farm, November 12, 1853.

This is the fourth year that I have cultivated carrots on the
same piece of ground. It has never produced less than fifteen
‘tons to the acre. It is also sect to an orchard of apple trees,
which are in a flourishing condition. I have spread about the
same quantity of manure each year, and the ground is in good
condition for a crop of carrots next year. ]. HOM:

This is to certify, that I measured off one acre from a piece
of carrots on Brook Farm; I also measured six hundred and
thirteen baskets from said acre; I weighed three baskets, which
averaged fifty-nine pounds to the basket, making eighteen tons
one hundred pounds.

Dan T. Boynton.

Statement of Cheever Newhall, Esq., in a letter to the chair-
man of the committee on farms, of which the latter speaks as
follows, in a letter to the president of the society—Hon. Mar-
shall P. Wilder :-—

We have here an account of a remarkably profitable cultiva-
tion of a few acres of old and poor pasture ground, the knowl-
edge of which may be highly useful and encouraging. Certainly
it shows that the farmers of Norfolk County have no reasonable
cause for complaint, while, by timely and judicious labor, they
may secure a harvest equal in value to many that are gathered
from the fertile soils of Ohio or Illinois.

C. C. SEWALL.

DorcueEsteR, December 12, 1853.

To the Rev. Charles C. Sewall.

DEAR Sir—In conversation with you, a few days since, rela-
tive to a crop of ruta-bagas raised by me, on five acres of land,
the present season, I stated the result; since which, I have

240 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

received a note from you, “soliciting a detailed account of the
manner of planting and cultivating them.

The land on which they grew was poor pasture land, and had
not been cultivated for more than thirty years. It was plough-
ed: last fall, and again this spring; was well manured, partly
with night soil and partly with pizggery manure, to which was
added a quantity of guano and ground bones,—the cost of the
two latter being $6.60 per acre. The potatoes grew well, and
yielded a fair crop; were dug early, and sent to market. In
digging the potatoes, the tops were laid regularly between the
rows; at the same time care was taken to haul the earth over
them, which made somewhat of a ridge. These ridges were
three feet apart. The ruta-baga seed was dropped upon them,
nine inches apart, at several times between July 27th and
August 10th. No plough was used after taking off the crop of
potatoes. Atleast one-tenth of the spaces intended for the
ruta-bagas was vacant, as the seed did not vegetate. About
ten days after the plants were up, the cultivator was passed
between the rows; the plants were thinned out, leaving but one
in a space, and thoroughly weeded. This is all the cultivation
they received. About the 20th of October, the entire crop on
the five acres was sold for one hundred and fifty dollars—the
purchaser to take them from the ground, where they then were.

The person who bought them says that the produce was more
than twelve hundred bushels, and that they were well worth
the sum he paid for them. When it is considered that this
crop was raised upon land that had produced a fair yield of
potatoes, and that thirty dollars per acre was realized for a
second crop, while the expense did not exceed five dollars per
acre, I am led to believe that land will sometimes, at least, pay
the cultivator a fair compensation for the labor bestowed.

With much esteem,
Your obedient servant,

CHEEVER NEWHALL.

ROOT CROPS. 241

PLYMOUTH.

Statement of Seth Sprague.

Onions.—The quarter of an acre of land on which were
grown the onions entered by me for premium, was cropped with
onions the last year. I spread thereon five and a half tons of
kelp or sea-weed, which was ploughed under eight inches deep.
The last week in April, spread six cart-loads of good, fine com-
post manure. The lot was then harrowed several times, and
hand-raked; and the first week in May, planted with the im-
proved Danvers Silverskin, with a seed-sower, in rows, fourteen
inches apart. The land is a moist, not wet, black loam. The
ground proved weedy, which gave us much trouble; the rows
being close together, increased the labor of cultivation. The
crop was harvested between the 10th and 20th instant, and
measured one hundred and ninety-two bushels. Expense of
cultivation, exclusive of manure, $22.50.

Douxsury, September, 1853.

Statement of George Drew.

Ruta-Bagas.—The land on which I planted one-quarter of
an acre of French turnips, the present season, was planted to
corn in 1852. In April, 1853, I ploughed and harrowed it; the
second week in June, I carted on two cords of barn manure,
ploughed it in, and harrowed it. In about a week after, I
ploughed it again, lightly spread on thirty-eight bushels of
ashes, and harrowed it. On the 24th and 25th of the same
month, I planted it. I dug holes for the hills, with a hoe, two
feet one way, and twenty inches the other; put in a small
spoonful of plaster, dropped the seed by hand, and covered
it with a hoe.

Expenses :—
Ploughing three times, and harrowing, carting on manure
and ashes, : : : : ‘ : A . $4 00
Planting, . : : ; t ‘ ; : . 2 50
Forty-eight bushels of ashes, at 12 cents, . ; Ree Sel)
One hundred pounds of plaster, . : ; ‘ : 50
31*

242 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

a

Hoeing, twice, . : : . $5 00
Harvesting, which is be Bone. Sepa. : ; . 2 50
$20 26

October 21st, I harvested one average rod of the turnips,
which weighed two hundred and thirty-six pounds, making
67416 bushels.

Statement of Seth Sprague.

Carrots.—The quarter of an acre of land entered by me for
premium on carrots, is a sandy loam, and was in carrots last
year. I spread six ox-cart loads of stable manure, ploughed
eight inches deep; spread one hundred pounds Peruvian guano,
prepared with thirty bushels of peat or swamp mud, which was
well harrowed in; hand-raked, and planted with a seed-sower
the first week in May, with the Orange carrot, in rows, fourteen
inches apart; thinned at weeding to four and six inches in the
rows. On the 22d instant, dug one square rod, a fair average
of the field, which weighed three hundred and cighteen pounds,
which, at fifty-six pounds to the bushel, is two hundred and
twenty-seven bushels—nine hundred and eight bushels to
the acre.

The expense of cultivating, exclusive of the guano and
manure, was twenty dollars, perhaps something more; as weeds
were plenty and vigorous, we bestowed extra labor.

Beets.——The quarter of an acre of land of beets, entered
by me for a premium, is a sandy loam, moist but not wet; was
cropped with beets last year. Spread six cart-loads stable ma-
nure, ploughed it about eight inches deep. It was subsoiled
last year. I spread one hundred pounds Peruvian guano, pre-
pared with thirty bushels peat or swamp mud, which was well
harrowed in; hand-raked, and planted with a seed-sower, the
first week in May, with mangel wurzel, in rows two feet
apart, and thinned to one foot in the rows. On the 22d inst.
selected one square rod, in two places; gathered and weighed
the product, three hundred and twelve bushels and a half to
the quarter acre, or one thousand two hundred and fifty bush-
els to the acre. The growth was vigorous in the early part of

ROOT CROPS. 243

the season, which did not seem to hold out to the end. In
using guano on soil not wet and close, I should prefer to bury
it with the plough; four or six inches, or even deeper, where
the soil is not too loose and sandy, would be better than laying
it on the top of the ground Guano is a powerful stimulant to
most, if not all, plants; it yields its strength, ammonia, quickly ;
and if not buried or in some way absorbed, it is lost in the atmos-
phere. On my beets and carrots it evidently forced a heavy
growth of leaves, but did not fully carry out its promise in the
harvest. Iam not satisfied with the trial. I intend making
more careful experiments next year. It seems doubtful
whether farmers can afford to use it for ordinary purposes.
We need experience, which is the only real test. We must see
and realize its effects on our crops, to induce us to pay fifty
dollars per ton for it.

The expense in cultivating a quarter of an acre of beets, is
about twenty dollars, exclusive of the manure, rent of land, &e.
If the cultivation is easy, and few weeds, it may be a little less;
if hard and weedy, something more.

Duxsury, September, 1853.

BARNSTABLE,

Statement of Joshua Crowell.

Carrots——May 34, planted one-fourth acre on a soil mixed
with clay and loam. Land was bought in 1843, at $23 per
acre; for three years planted with potatoes, and manured prin-
cipally with sea-weed; in 1846, seeded down to grass; again
broken up in 1852, and planted with carrots, but the crop was
light, not more than three hundred and sixty bushels per acre.
Last year, manured with twelve horse-loads of barnyard ma-
nure, and the same this year. Carrots raised on the quarter
of an acre weighed ten thousand and seventy-three pounds.
They were planted in drills, two feet apart.

Value of the crop thus raised, five tons, at $9 per
ton,» . ; , . § : : " $45 00
Cost of manure, cultivation, and harvesting, . : 20 33

Profits on one-fourth of an acre, . : : $24 67

244 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

CRANBERRIES.

The following communication has been received in addition
to the statement given below :—

C. L. Flint, E'sq., Secretary, &c.

Dear Sir :—My attention was first called to the subject by a
gentleman from Natick, who stated to me that the best cran-
berry meadows in that vicinity were worth from $1,000 to
$1,300 per acre, which struck me with some astonishment. I
then looked at my own swamps, and could see no good reason
why they could not be made as good cranberry-meadow as any
other, and accordingly went to work and built a dam to flow the
swamp to kill the bushes. After flowing three years, I took off
the water, and set from one to one and a half acres with cran-
berry vines; this was done in 1846. We found at that time a
few beds of native vines, which have spread to be equal to one-
fourth or one-third of the transplanted. The cost of the whole
operation, we think, could not have exceeded $50. And now
for the proceeds :—

In the year 1851, our crop sold for $70; in 1852, for $300;
in 1853, for $380.

I have no doubt but there is swamp land enough in Massa-
chusctts, suitable for raising cranberries, to raise enough, at the
prices they have brought for the last two years, to come to
more than all the corn, grain and apples raised in Massachu-
setts. I will here add the remarks of two gentlemen in regard
to glutting the market with the article; the first a city man,
who said, the inhabitants of Boston and New York have not’
as yet, begun to get the taste of cranberries. The second, a
farmer and nurseryman, who said, if I had ten acres, and you
had ten acres, and every man between you and me, and every
man between you and Canada line had ten acres each, and
they all bore two hundred bushels to the acre, it would not
glut the market.

Yours, respectfully,

ADDISON FLINT.

Nortu Reapine, February 9, 1854.

CRANBERRIES. 245

MIDDLESEX.

Statement of Addison Flint.

In the autumn of 1843, I built a dam, and flowed the swamp
from that time till August, 1846; then let off the water.

The following October, burnt over the swamp and set the
vines. The vines were cut up with a sharp hoe or shovel, and
set in hills, three and one-half feet apart; the bunches about
the size of a quart measure.

In raising from the seed, I planted in October, 1846, about
half an acre; crushing each berry between the thumb and
finger, and placing it just under the mud; single berries in a
hill, three and a half feet apart. Also, sowed broadcast a
number of bushels of refuse cranberries the following spring.
Very few vines appeared from them for two or three years; no
berries till 1852, then very small; in 1853, good size, in quan-
tity, worth picking.

My practice has been to stop the water in October, and keep
it on till May, or until the weather is warm enough to start
vegetation—then lower it down to the top of the vines, and
keep it on them until I think the spring frosts are over, then
let the vines be fairly out of water until the berries are grown,
—say from 10th to 15th August,—then draw it off for ripening
and picking.

We found three or four small beds of native vines on the
swamp, after we let off the water to set the vines, and a few
very fine berries; there is now probably a dozen beds that
bear berries.

In 1850, we picked seventeen bushels of berries on the
swamp; in 1851, twenty-eight bushels; in 1852, ninety-three
bushels; in 1853, we estimated them at one hundred and fifty
bushels.

In 1852, the native vines produced, by estimation, before
selling, forty bushels; the transplanted vines, sixty bushels;
the increase this ycar is, principally, from the transplanted
vines.

Nortu Reapine, October 1, 1853.

246 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

Statement of Augustus H. Leland.

The piece of cranberry meadow to which I invite your atten-
tion, contains about three-quarters of an acre. The mud and
peat is deep, varying from three to seven feet. The soil is
black mud which lies on the peat, and the peat rests on a light
layer of sand, and under that, as near as I could ascertain at
one point, a clayey gravel. There were four or more kinds of
grass upon this piece which had been cut off yearly ever since
my remembrance.

The first of these grasses is called carer filiformis, a kind of
sedge grass, which passes by the name of water-grass—erew
upon the greater portion of this piece. Another kind is the
carex stricta, a kind of sedge grass, called hassock-grass; and
also, the narrow-leaved sword-grass. The third kind, carer
lacustris, a kind of sedge grass, with broad leaf, and is called
broad-leaved sword-grass. The fourth kind is scirpus eriopho-
rum, the true name being wool-grass, called the broad-leaved
sword-erass and also broad-grass. These grasses I shall al-
Jude to in my experience which will be annexed to this state-
ment.

In the autumn of the year 1838, I think, with a cast-iron
shovel ground sharp and put in good cutting order, I removed
squares or sods of the turf from the ground, one side of these
squares nearly corresponding in length to the width of the
shovel, the depth of the hole being from four to five inches. I
then, from beds of vines, cut sods of vines corresponding in size
and in depth to that which I had removed, which I placed in
the holes already made, and with the feet trod or pressed them
firmly into the hole, that they might not be disturbed by the
action of the ice or water, during the winter or spring. The
distance of these sods, or hills, one from another, was from
three and a half to four feet. As some of these vines which I
transplanted had grown from fifteen to eighteen inches in length
and lay nearly level with the ground, care was taken to raise
the vines, and place the shovel under so as not to cut off the
vines and also to get a sod of the proper size, otherwise the

CRANBERRIES. 247

vines would be cut off and greatly injured. As far as I have
seen, vines, which are of much length, and which lay under
water during the winter and spring, will, if let alone, naturally
lean to the north-east, (for the same reason that fruit trees
lean that way,) and as I rake my vines all one way, that is, I
draw the rake from the south-west to the north-east, so I placed
those sods of vines which did not stand erect so that they
would lean to the north-east.

Every year since the year 1840, these vines were eaten up
as regularly as the year came round, by a worm called in this
vicinity the cranberry-worm. This worm may be the same, or
at least, a species of the same worm, which operated the last
of June on the apple tree; its appearance to the eye is the
same, its operations the same, and it has the same faculty of
jerking itself back as the apple tree worm. Some seasons they
seemed to threaten total annihilation, the vines presenting to
the eye the same appearance that an orchard does when its
foliage has been eaten by the canker-worm, To destroy this
worm the vines were kept under water from spring until the
first of July, 1852. This destroyed all the worms, I believe, as
I have not seen one since. When the water was taken off, the
vines grew vigorously, forming the blossom bud for the present
year, and the result is as handsome a lot of berries as ever was
seen.

Nearly every year I have cut the grass near the first of July,
thereby giving the plants the air, sun, and light.

One side of this piece borders upon a small brook, which,
previous to my cultivating the vine, in a dry time would become
dry. In this brook I formed a dam in two places; these dams,
most of the time in a season like this, keep the meadow wet,
and the water is forced back among the vines, the object of
which is to protect them from frosts, which usually occur in all
the summer months in low lands.

In addition to the above statement, I would like to give my
experience in the cultivation of the cranberry; I would do it
with the hope that by my efforts and experience, whether suc-
cessful or otherwise, those who would try the experiment may
be encouraged and emboldened to persevere in the cultivation

248 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. ’
of this delicious fruit, and which promises the cultivator so
great a reward.

It is more than twenty years since I entered upon the culti-
vation of the vine with high hopes, believing that the cranberry
was a hard thing to exterminate, that it would destroy grass
in all situations and in all soils, and cause even hassocks to
disappear. And after a trial and many years of observation, I
find the cranberry a hard plant to destroy, except with the
plough, and that it will not root out and destroy all grasses in
all situations and soils. I find that in some soils the vine will
not drive out certain kinds of grasses when in other soils, it
may succeed. Take, for instance, that kind of sedge grass
which we call hassock-grass—this upon banks of streams, and
in our swales where it is more or less wet, roots with such
strong hold, and throws up the blades of grass so thickly, that
there is no room for the vine in a soil less rich, and the vine
will in all probability succeed.

Take, for instance, the osmunda spectabilis, called in this
vicinity buckthorn, and known to botanists by the name of
flowering fern. This grows in the form of a tree, its slender
stem supporting a large top with a large leaf, overshadowing
all around, and shutting out the sun, light and air so much that
the vine cannot grow. On one occasion I set out vines among
the flowering fern, and in about three or four years the sods of
vines could not be found. Close by the side of this was a
large bed of vines covering nearly a quarter of an acre of
ground, except four or five little places, ofa few yards in each,
which was flowering fern, or buckthorn. In order that the
ground might be comparatively covered with vines, I cut up and
carted this buckthorn to the upland, and set sods of vines in
its place, expecting that they would some day take the place
of the buckthorn. In this I have not been disappointed, for
these plats are loaded with the largest fruit; so thickly do the
berries lay this day, that, in some places, they would, if col-
lected and laid upon a level place, completely cover the ground.
But this quarter of an acre of vines in a few years was gone,
except a few stray runners; the flowering fern had taken their
place, and the plats I set out are only left to tell where the
original bed of vines stood. Now I do not suppose that in

CRANBERRIES. 249

every situation and kind of soil this fern would supplant
the vine, although in this case it did. I have several small
plats of ground besides, one containing some fifty square
rods, the turf containing the roots of the buckthorn. I cut
in strips about fifteen inches wide and set it up edge-wise to
dry. These were burnt when dry, and the ashes carried to
the compost heap, as they are not needed on this soil.

These plats were set with sods, with most excellent success ;
one-half rod gave me this season one bushel of berries, which
is at the rate of at least three hundred and twenty bushels to
the acre. These experiments show clearly that the plant can-
not be set in this grass with any prospect of success. There.
is another kind of grass called polly pod, also small brake,
dryopteris thelypleris, which, as far as I have seen where it:
covers the ground, casts so much shade that the vine cannot
succeed in it. It is more easily pulled up than the buckthorn ;
and when dried and burned, vines may be set with good results.

There is another kind called by some the broad-leaved
sword-grass, and by others broad-grass, and by botanists wool-
grass, scirpus eriophorum. It grows in round plats or clumps,
varying in diameter from three feet to twelve feet. In the
piece I presented to you for examination there are several plats
of this grass which show that the vine cannot take root in it.

Upon this same piece of ground is another kind of grass coy-
ering some two rods called carer lacustris, a coarse kind of
sedge grass; its general appearance does not differ from wool-
grass, the blades of which are not so thickly set in the soil as
the wool-grass, yet so much so that the vine succeeds with
difficulty.

The other kind of grass in this piece is called carex filiformis,
a kind of sedge grass and water grass. This grows in wet
places, throwing a less number of blades which cast less shade,
and when mown there is less stubble than any other kind of
grass I have noticed. On the whole, the vines have flourished
quite as well in this as in any other grass, although my suc-
cess has been equally good on one piece of hassock and sedge
grass.

On another plat which was covered with hassocks I set sods
between them which have nearly disappeared, the hassocks

32*

250 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

a

standing alone in their glory. I would recommend that all
hassocks be removed before setting out vines. And also, let
no man set out rose-bushes with his vines.

I would suggest that when the thermometer, the direction of
the wind, &c., denote a frost, if there be a stream of water
which the cultivator can command, that a dam be built and so
constructed that the water may be thrown back during a cold
spell, and when it is past let the water run again. Ifa stream
of water of sufficient size does not flow—reservoirs of water
may in places be laid up for use in a frosty time.

As far as my observation extends there are but few soils in
which the cranberry will not flourish, Where it will not, the
character of the soil may be changed by carting on gravel,
loam or sand, at any time in winter; if necessary spread it
upon the ice from one to three inches in depth; the vines will
find their way through and grow with new life and vigor.

I have in two instances made trial of burning the vines
because they were old and did not seem to bear fruit. These
pieces contained together some ten to fifteen rods.

I can see no good reason for burning vines except to destroy
the cranberry worm when it cannot be done by flowing in
summer. If burning is resorted to great care must be taken
not to burn in too dry a time. If there be but few vines and
other matter to burn, it would be necessary to select a time
more dry than if there were a great body of vines—as they
would burn almost any time when once on fire.

Meadows for cranberries must not be drained.

Above is my statement, and also my experience, and I rest
my claim for the premium on three reasons.

1. The successful experiment in transplanting.

2, In establishing the principle that flowing until the first of
July will destroy effectually the cranberry worm, so destructive
to the vine.

And, lastly, yet by no means the least, my experience and
observation of more than twenty years in the cultivation of the
vine in the different grasses, which may, by being given to the
public, save those who cultivate this fruit much precious time as
well as large sums of money.

SHERBORN, September 13, 1853.

CRANBERRIES. 251

PLYMOUTH.

From the Report of the Commitice on Improvements.

The premiums “for the greatest quantity of cultivated cran-
berry vines on not less than an acre of land, which shall be in
the most flourishing condition in September, 1853,” were claim-
ed, severally, by Thomas H. Samson, of Pembroke, Austin J.
Roberts, of Lakeville, and Paul Hathaway, of Middleboro’.

Mr. Samson having succeeded, with great labor, in clearing
the brush and larger wood from two pieces of low, moist swamp
land—a deep vegetable soil; and having pared and removed
the turf and tussock stools from their svrf>ce, proceeded to set
his plants. This was done in different; jcars, commencing in
the spring of 1846, and ending in the {!] of 1852. It con-
sisted in placing small square sods containing them, cut from a
bog meadow, in holes dug for their reception, at short dis-
tances apart, and then drawing soil around in such manner as
to secure the sods, with their contents, in their new position.
This labor seems to have been performed without any view to
subjecting the plants to any subsequent course of culture,
which they appear not to have received.

Of these two pieces of land, one exhibits the plants, more
especially, in different stages of their growth; some having
been recently set out, looking puny and feeble, and showing
scarcely any runners; others of older date, looking stronger,
with runners more numerously thrown out and extended. But
of the larger part of this, and that of all the other plat, the
vines cover the surface with a mass of net work, although they
do not constitute the exclusive growth, appearing in a most
healthy and highly vigorous state, and bearing—a spectacle
gratifying to any one to witness, but peculiarly gratifying, it
may be supposed, to the proprietor—a most luxuriant crop of
sound, bright and sparkling fruit.

Actively engaged, as Mr. Roberts appears to have been, for
several years past, in adorning and improving his ample home,
stead, a work in which he has displayed much horticultural
taste and agricultural science and skill, he has yet found some
time to devote to the culture of the cranberry. The tract

252 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

a

selected by him for this purpose lies nearly at the foot of a
slope, descending in a westerly direction, and but a short
distance from his mansion, pleasantly situated within view of
portions of the bright and flashing waters of two of the neigh-
boring lakes, gracefully fringed with their sylvan borders, and
strongly tempting the angler’s skill. The place, for an upland
site, was not ill chosen. It is a fine sandy loam, apparently of
good depth, and in good condition. The open and friable
texture of the soil offers every facility for the free and unim-
peded extension of the rootlets and tissues of the plants, and
the rains falling on its surface, together with the wash from the
adjoining high ground, afford (or have done the past season at
least, and may do so aguin) a copious supply of moisture, and
with it, probably, no incoisiderable amount of other nutritious
matter. The sward having been turned over with the plough
and harrowed, the plants, procured, as were those of Mr. Samson,
from a fresh meadow, were introduced into shallow furrows
running lenzthwise of the lot, and set nearly three feet apart
each way. The grass and weeds were carefully kept down for
two years, when the further task of clean cultivation was
abandoned, as, if not impracticable without clipping the runners»
involving too great an expense to make the culture a remune-
rating business. Hence, the plants were left to take care of
themselves, and to struggle for supremacy, as they might be
able, with the natural products of the soil. This conflict, the
foregoing favorable circumstances have been of essential service
in helping them to maintain; those circumstances have had the
effect of producing, for the most part, thrifty looking vines,
showing, in places, a goodly yield of large, sound, and handsome
berries. As compared, however, with those of Mr. Samson,
one square rod of which produced, as I should have before
mentioned, six and one-quarter pecks of berries, being at the
rate of two hundred and fifty bushels to the acre, Mr. Roberts’
vines appeared to be less vigorous and productive; and much
less free from grass and other unwelcome products. On visit-
ing Mr. Hathaway’s field (a “ sandy loam,” as he describes it)
his cranberry vines, it was found, were scarcely visible amid
the thick coat of grasses that encumbered them, and generally
covered the ground, and which no apparent effort had been

CRANBERRIES. 253

made to eradicate. Against these grasses, however, in a soil
that it loves, the cranberry, fairly introduced, would probably
be able to hold on, and even succeed in maintaining with them,
at least, a divided empire. But there appeared to be, in this
case, another enemy to contend with, in the shape of vulgar,
unsightly bushes, which, having gained a foothold at different
points, seemed to bid fair to make the contest one of fearful
odds against the former, and ultimately to win the field. Mr.
Hathaway, it must be admitted, has succeeded in raising this
fruit, but his experiment at present seems not to be one of a
very promising character. This is not strange, for it is hardly
to be expected that one whose life is deeply “in the yellow
leaf,’ would be able to attain success in a laborious enterprise,
which the strength and energy of his greenest and freshest
manhood could not have been more than adequate to secure.

The foregoing experiments having been conducted upon the
same scale of dimensions, one acre of land, the statements and
observations already made with regard to the method pursued,
and the results attained by the several competitors, may be
sufficient to indicate the relative degree of their respective
merits. There remains, however, one other point to be settled.

The premiums claimed are proposed for the greatest quanti-
ty, on not less than an acre of land, of the most flourishing
“cultivated cranberry vines.” What, then, are “cultivated
cranberry vines,” within the meaning of the trustees, as here
expressed? In what would seem to be the more appropriate
and restricted signification of the terms, they are such as are
in the course of being nurtured and cherished by some annual
process or processes of manipulation; by hand labor, that is,
in some form, being bestowed upon them, as in stirring the soil,
shortening in the runners, &c., and by the occasional adminis-
tration of some description of fertilizer. Applied to the cran-
berry in this sense, the term “cultivated” is what it is generally
understood to be when applied to the strawberry, and nothing
more or less. Holding such to be the meaning designed -to be
conveyed by the language used, no competitor would be entitled
to any award, as no competitor has shown any cranberry vines,
or made any statement with respect to any of a description
fairly and properly comprehended within such meaning.

254. MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

a

But in a wider and more popular sense, cultivated cranberry
vines are those upon which only the labor of transplanting from
the fresh meadow has been bestowed, no less than those under
a course of treatment similar to that above described.

As the subject to some is not without interest, permit me, in
conclusion, to suggest what would seem to be a good mode of
raising the cranberry. It is this: Select for the purpose a
deep vegetable soil, pare and remove the turf from its surface,
dress, if practicable, with fine sand, (not soil) or some better
material; set the plants, giving them fair working distance,
and then, for the space of two or three years, use all diligence
to help them to hold and occupy, not, in any sense, as common-
ers or copartners with other products, but as sole tenants,
which they will not be backward in seeking to become. I will
only add, that if the waters of any small stream near at hand
can be so controlled as to throw a thin sheet over the surface,
during winter, and occasionally, perhaps, for a brief while, at
other times, to refresh and invigorate its occupants, and prevent
injury from frost, which sometimes happens, it would be a
desideratum, connected with the object in view, of much im-
portance.

Joun E. Howarp, Supervisor.

Statement of Thomas H. Samson.

Having entered my claim for “the greatest quantity of cul-
tivated cranberry vines on not less than an acre of land,’ I
beg leave to present the subjoined “ particular account of my
several operations.”

In the summer of 1845, I commenced preparing about half
an acre of swamp land for the cultivation of cranberries; it
was completely covered with whortleberry bushes and alders ;
these were removed to the upland, and the tussocks and the
top of the soil were removed, and early in the spring of 1846,
I set out about one-fourth of the lot with cranberry vines, without
any dressing. In the spring of 1847, I set out about the same
quantity, and about the same in 1848, a part of which was
dressed with gravel and soil. In the spring of 1849, 1 com-
pleted the half acre, covering the last with a dressing of gravel

CRANBERRIES. 255

and soil, about one inch in thickness. In the month of June,
1849, I sowed a bushel of cranberries over the whole lot, first
crushing them and mixing them with sand, in order to sow more
evenly.

The vines soon covered the ground, and have produced a
good quantity of fruit for four or five years. In the summer
of 1850, I commenced preparing the other half acre, on the
easterly side of the highway, removing the wood and bushes,
taking the tussocks and soil off, &c. In the fall of 1850, I set
out cranberry vines on about one-half of this lot. It was so
wet in the fall of 1851, that I could not finish it. In the fall
of 1852, I completed the work, dressing about one-half with
sand and gravel, about the same quantity as on the first lot.

I can discover no beneficial effects from the dressing with
sand or gravel, and think it rather encourages the growth of
grass. I find my vines do the best where the peat or mud are
the deepest.

The first half of this lot set out, are in bearing condition,
and have borne fruit two years; the other half are now doing
well.

On the 10th instant, I gathered from one rod of the vines,
set in 1850, one bushel anda half and two quarts of cran-
berries.

In the spring of 1852, I tried the following experiment to
test the practicability of raising cranberries on a dry, gravelly
soil. I first removed the sod from one square rod, and sowed
cranberry seed in the same manner as we do carrots; the seed
vegetated, but they do not promise very fair to remunerate me
for my labor, and I have little faith in raising cranberries on
dry soil.

I would state that I flow my cranberry meadows from Octo-
ber to April.

Statement of Austin J. Roberts.

The increasing demand and consequent high and remunerat-
ing prices for the cranberry, have led me to experiment on its
adaptation to the light loams of our county. A boggy or very
moist soil has generally been deemed indispensable to the

256 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

profitable cultivation of the cranberry, for the reason of its
being the natural soil—that wherein nature placed it; and as
nature rarely errs, it has been taken for granted that it was
not misplaced.

In the fall of 1847, I noticed that the cranberries on a cer-
tain low, swampy soil, were much benefited by the sand washed
from an adjoining hill. In size, the berries were larger, and
the yield there was more abundant, compared with the product
of the vines further in the swamp, where the sand had not
reached. This led me to the determination to ascertain how
far the cultivation of the cranberry ona sandy loam might
profitably be carried. _ Accordingly, in November, 1848, I com-
menced setting out about an acre of land to cranberry vines.

The piece of land in question, hada gentle slope to the west ;
the upper portion was very light and porous, and so poor that
it had, in previous years, been considered hardly worthy of
cultivation. The middle part, comprising one-third of the
piece, was good, light, loamy soil, not lable to bake, or suffer
from drought. The third portion of the lower part was strong
loam, inclined to moisture, and may be termed good grass
land. Thus, this acre of land embraced soils of three different
textures, and was purposely chosen to notice the effect of soil
on the vines. The way of planting was as follows: The land
was ploughed eight inches deep and harrowed; light furrows,
three and a half feet apart, were then run lengthwise; cran-
berry sods, of the Bell variety, were cut eight to ten inches
square, with a sharp spade, wheeled out of the swamp, carted
on the upland, and deposited in the furrows three feet apart,
althouch two feet would have been better, so that the sods, as
placed in the furrows, were three anda half by three feet
apart. Clean cultivation was, for the next two years, carried
on by the cultivator and the hoe. The third year, the vines
had commenced extending themselves in all directions, and at
the end of the season had, in many places, nearly covered the
ground. Runners, from three to four feet in length, were
thrown out with great luxuriance, rendering the cultivator and
hoe of no further use in keeping down the grass and weeds.
Fingering (cleaning by hand) an acre of cranberries was now
out of the question, so that weeds, grass, and cranberries were

CRANBERRIES. 257

left to conflict for the mastery. During the drought of 1852,
the cranberry vines on the upper or dryest part of the land,
began to fail, evidently suffering from the severity of the
drought. On the middle portion, the soil being deep and mel-
low, they grew finely, overpowering the weeds and grass, and in
places, bearing at the rate of half a bushel to the square rod,
and apparently not at all affected by the dry weather. In the
lowest part, which was the moistest, the grass appeared to gain
the ascendancy, and although the vines spread as well as the
grass, the yield of cranberries was not more than one-third as
great as on the middle portion, owing, doubtless, to the natu-
ral tendency of the soil to grass.

This year, (1852,) the vines in the central part overrun the
ground, to the exclusion of every thing else, and the yield ap-
pears, (October 13,) greater than that of any preceding year,
and the fruit far superior in size and color to that raised on
swamps. Whether the grass in the lower part will eventually
yield to the cranberry, is a matter which time will prove, but
which I think is likely.

Salt, at the rate of four bushels to the acre, I would recom-
mend as a preventive for worms, which are so troublesome on
light soils. One-tenth of my upland berries were destroyed
by the worms or the plum curculio last year, but their ravages,
I believe, have ceased, as I have not observed a berry stung
this year. ;

Salt, I believe to be a benefit to the upland cranberry, inas-
much as it attracts the moisture, keeps down the weeds, in a
measure, and aids the growth of the vines, to say nothing about
the vermin. Ona small scale, I have applied, at the rate of
fifteen bushels of salt per acre, over the vines in the spring,
with impunity. The conclusions to which I arrive, after experi-
menting with the cranberry five years, are as follows :—

Ist. That the cranberry will flourish and yield best on moist
sand; that they will grow and produce well on loamy soils,
but moderately dry, is an established fact in my own mind,
though, as a matter of choice, poor, moist sand would be pref-
erable.

2d. That porous, sandy loams for the cultivation of the cran-
berry, are unsuitable, and contrary to the nature and require-

33*

258 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

ments of the plant. In a wet season, the vines may grow well
and throw out vigorous runners, thus deceiving the cultivator,
but let a severe drought come, and they will suffer and die.
In a moist climate, like that of England, the case might be
different; but throughout our country, the profitable cultiva-
tion of the cranberry, without moisture, is impracticable.

The art of raising the cranberry consists in the selection of
damp, barren sands, (though not necessary,) flowed in winter ;
if the soil be poor, damp, and loose, the surface is speedily
covered by the vines, and little trouble or labor is experienced
in subduing the weeds and grass. If the soil be rich, the weeds
and grass will obtain the mastery, which can only be obviated
by an amount of expense and attention inadequate to the
returns.

Varieties.—Three kinds may’be enumerated—the Bell, as it
is generally called, is the best for transplanting on loamy soils»
In its wild state itis often found on the edge of cranberry
bogs, working its way towards the upland. In form, the fruit
is globular, and larger than the other varieties; I think ita
more constant bearer, and on light soils it ripens ten days
earlier than on the bogs. The next kind is the pear-shaped
variety, a shy bearer, and, with me, unproductive on the up-
land. It is rather more erect in growth than the Bell variety,
and the general size of the fruit is smaller.

The small European variety comes next. Its identity was
discovered by Mr. Oakes, on Nantucket. It is not found so
generally as the other two varieties; the berries are much
smaller, but ripen better on boggy meadows than either of the
other kinds. In production, it is a constant bearer, but the
size of the berry would not commend itself for general culti-
vation.*

BARNSTABLE.
Report of the Commitiee.

Cranberries have not succeeded so well in this county, this
year, as in some former years, particularly the last; but as

* This is a distinct species, and not a variety of the American cranberry.—Eb.

CRANBERRIES. 259

there is much more land in cultivation now than ever before,
the whole quantity raised will probably equal that of any pre-
vious year.

The principal reasons why the yield has been less than in
some previous years, are :—

1st. The uncommon fruitfulness of last year over-taxed the
vines. For we find that those vines which produced so well
then, have yielded but sparingly this year, while those that bore
but little last year, have produced the principal part of the
present crop. It seems to be well ascertained that the cran-
berry, like the apple, will not produce large crops two years in
succession.

2d. The water being unusually high in the ponds and swamps,
did not drain off in season for the fruit to come forward.

3d. As a consequence of the superabundance of moisture,
grass and rushes have been more liable to come in, and have
been very injurious to the crops in low places.

The committee are of opinion that those swamps which have
been laid down to cranberries the last few years have not been
raised sufficiently high, and that more fail from this than any
other cause.

The committee are sorry to say that only one individual has
presented a statement of his experiments in the cultivation of
the cranberry—he having reclaimed one-fourth of an acre of
beach sand knolls, which was before entirely worthless, from
which he presents twenty quarts of very fine fruit taken from
one rod.

In conclusion, we would add, that we see no reason why the
bad yield this year, should discourage any individual from
continuing the cultivation of the cranberry, and of reclaiming
swamps and filling up ponds for that purpose. If there is
too much water on some lots, and grass and rushes have almost
destroyed the fruit, our advice would be, to add a few inches
of sand, of the proper quality, reset the vines and hope for bet-
ter success for the future—for we are fully of the opinion
that the raising of cranberries will ever continue to be a very
profitable business in thiscounty. All of which is respectfully
submitted.

OzEeD Brooks, Jr., Chairman.

260 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

THE ROTATION OF CROPS.

BY T. G. HUNTINGTON,
HAMPSHIRE.

I propose to offer a few observations on that part of the
science and practice of agriculture, usually understood and
embraced by the term, rotation of crops. This is a branch of
the profession, in regard to the details of which, there is a
great variety of opinion; and, if possible, a still greater variety
of practice; although about the thing itself, there is not much
room for dispute. It will be as well, therefore, to preface my
remarks with a definition of terms.

Rotation of crops, in general, may be defined the producing
upon a given piece of land, a series of crops in successive years,
without much regard to the nature of the soil, or to the inter-
vals, at which the course is to be repeated. This definition
describes well enough our common practice, which we believe,
in most instances, ‘to be deficient in method, pernicious in its
operation, and unprofitable in its results. A much better
definition would be—the art of raising, upon a given lot of
land, such a series of crops in successive years and at such in-
tervals, that it shall yield the greatest profit to the producer
with the least exhaustion of the soil. It requires, for its most
successful application, a knowledge of the soils to be operated
upon, a mature experience, sound judgment, and a skilful appli-
ance of means. <A judicious rotation of crops, therefore, lies at
the very foundation of good field husbandry, and no farmer
should be satisfied with himself, until he has put into practice a
system suitable to his land and remunerative to his purse. No
where, probably, has this branch of agriculture been carried to
such perfection as in England, Scotland, and perhaps some of
the continental states. A full persuasion of the necessity of
improvement in this respect, among our Massachusetts farmers,
must be my apology for this essay. I have remarked that our
common practice is deficient in method, pernicious in its opera-
tion, and unsatisfactory in its results. These are grave charges;
it must be confessed. Perhaps, before proceeding further, it

ROTATION OF CROPS. 261

may be well to examine them. For one,I believe a careful
investigation of the facts of the case would clearly sustain them,
In regard to the first, for instance—a want of method. If we go
through the town or county and inquire of the farmers whether
they have adopted a regular system of rotation; one that they
are confident is best adapted to the soil; or, that varies, so as
to accommodate itself to the different kinds of soil the farm
may contain—how many of them would answer in the affirma-
tive? Judging from personal observation, and from other
sources, I venture to say, not one-fourth part. Many of us are
altogether too much influenced by the fluctuations in the price
of any article we are accustomed to raise. If, this year, it
brings a good price—farewell to all our resolutions to be more
methodical, if we have ever formed them. Next year money
must be made, and every spare rod of ground that will produce
it, is devoted to the profitable crop.

So common is this feeling, that it is matter of every-day
observation, that any unusual rise in the price of a staple pro-
duct, is almost sure to be followed in the course of a year or
two by as unnatural a depression; and it affords a most striking
proof of our want of method.

Again, if some men are fortunate enough to raise a crop,
which has more than answered their expectations; instead of
endeavoring to ascertain the causes that produced so favorable
a result, in order that it may be applied to other fields, they
will require the same land to produce the like again, and so,
from year to year, until the resources of the soil are exhausted.

This is one kind of method, it is true. It is methodical se-
verity, and methodical ruin, but it is no economical method.
The very stones, if they had a voice, would cry out for a more
generous treatment than this.

I should be willing to admit, that the two classes of farmers
of whom I have spoken, are intelligent and thoughtful enough to
have some general plan; although they are often swayed by
circumstances to depart from it. There is another class, how-
ever, quite as large, probably, as either of the others, who have
no plan whatever; or change their plans as soon almost as they
make them; who break up, or seed down, plant or sow, as the
humor strikes them. If their fields are a faithful transcript of

262 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

a

their brains, it might puzzle even a phrenologist to locate the
bumps of such a tangled intellect. |

Thus, it would seem that our system of rotation is no system
at all; or nothing that deserves the name; and, moreover, it
is pernicious in its operation. Here, again, the appeal must
be made to facts, for the truth of the observation. It promotes
the growth of one of the most pernicious weeds that infest our
soils. We refer to the common sorrel. By far the larger
portion of lands laid down to grass, for the first year, instead
of filling the eye with the beauty, and the air with the fragrance
of a luxuriant crop of clover, exhibit nothing but the dull red
hue of the blossoms of this unsightly and useless plant. The
enormous production, yearly, of its seeds,—which go directly
into the hay and thence into the manure heap and to the field
again,—should be enough for the entire condemnation of our
present practice, unless the evil should be proved to be with-
out remedy.

And then, such a course can but be unsatisfactory in its re-
sults, for there is the unsightly field, there is the almost total
loss of one crop; and, in its stead, a full harvest of a deadly
weed. What but disappointment and loss can follow.

But, to proceed. Our subject naturally divides itself into
two parts, viz.: the kinds of crops to be cultivated, and the
order in which they should follow each other, together with the
time which should be allotted to the course.

In regard to the first point, general and long-continued usage
has decided what crops come within the range of most success-
ful cultivation; and, among them, first on the list stands grass.
By universal consent, New England is a grass, rather than a
grain growing country. That this is our great staple, any one
will acknowledge, after having observed how large a propor-
tion of the land is devoted to this crop. He who has what is
called a good grass farm, is considered as possessing one of the
first requisites to successful farming, and justly so. For, while
the cultivation of the cereals is attended with much labor and
some uncertainty,—the grass crop, when the ground is properly
prepared, is almost always sure, and the cost of securing it is
comparatively light. A very good test of its importance may
be observed in the general anxiety felt, when there is danger

ROTATION OF CROPS. 263

of failure of even a part of this most important production. It
is plain, then, that in our rotation of crops, great care should
be taken to fit the ground to produce grass abundantly, a point
on which many of us are too negligent.

Next to grass, comes Indian corn. As a hoed crop, it un-
doubtedly stands at the head of the list, and should occupy a
prominent place in our system. Next follow potatoes, oats, rye,
wheat, barley, and broomcorn where the nature of the soil
admits. Perhaps no course would include all of these. HExpe-
rience and observation must decide which can be grown to the
most advantage. Doubtless there are other crops, especially
of the root kind, which should engage a due share of attention.
I have only named some of the most important. Of tobacco I
have nothing to say; for though it is thought to be an excel-
lent preparation for some other crops, and, in many instances,
vastly profitable, it is my firm belief that the blessings attend-
ing its general cultivation, cannot outweigh or compare, even,
with its curses, considered either in a moral or economical
point of view.

We come, then, to the method of procedure, How shall we
conduct our series to the best advantage? Before answering
this question in detail, it may be well to name three general
principles, which should always be kept in view. First, our
rotation must be, as much as possible, suited to the character
-of the soil. Second, there must be reference to the fitting the
land for a good yield of grass. Third, each crop must occupy
that place in the course, which will be likely to insure the
ereatest success in raising it.

To the first of these, we cheerfully acknowledge that due
regard is generally paid. We rarely see farmers persist in their
attempts to raise crops to which their lands are not naturally
suited. The error is, rather, in the other direction. Many
times, they think it impossible to do that, which a little more
perseverance and skill would enable them to achieve. I might
cite, for example, the growing of wheat; which, in this region,
not many years since, was thought to be next to impossible;
but which is now becoming quite a common crop. The princi-
ple embraces both sides of the question; for we ought certainly
to be as ready to adopt a profitable crop, which our ground —

264 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

=

will produce, as we are careful to avoid those which are un-
suitable.

In regard to the preparation of the soil for grass, the common
practice is much more faulty. Indeed, I am persuaded that
herein lies our chief defect. Our rotation hardly ever com-
prises more than two cultivated crops; unless an exception is
made in favor of the meadows, which are often kept up for a
much longer time. These two crops are, generally, corn or
potatoes, followed by rye, oats or wheat, with grass seeds.
Now, if the object is, as it should be, to induce a good growth
of grass, I contend that the means are inadequate to the end.
Grass seeds, in order to take well, require a finely pulverized
surface, made light and warm with manure, and the old sod
should be entirely decomposed or buried. This it is quite im-
possible to do on ordinary soils in one year and with only
two ploughings. The second ploughing brings up the old turf—
an inert, sour mass; which, at that particular stage of decom-
position, of all others, is the most unfit to afford the nourish-
ment that the plants need. Without making any pretence to
actual knowledge, never having had analyzed a piece of sod in
this halfrotted condition, I have adopted the following theory,.
which has at least the merit of agreeing with the facts in the
case. All vegetable matter goes through three stages of
fermentation, similar to what in liquids are called the vinous,
the acctous and the putrid. When a sod is inverted, as by the °
plough in the first season, it passes through the vinous fermen-
tation. During this period it throws off some gases, which are
beneficial to the growing crop. Cold weather arrests the
progress of decomposition and it passes into the acetous state.
It now very much resembles, in its general character, the muck
fresh from the swamp. It will grow most luxuriant crops of
sorrel, wild wormwood or smart-weed; but, as for grass, you
might about as well expect to raise it upon an African desert
as upon land in such a condition. Our cultivated grasses are
remarkably sweet. How, then, can we expect these to grow
upon a sour or bitter soil? No wonder that we are doomed
to disappointment, if we will thus persist in our attempts to
contravene the laws of nature. If you ask what is the remedy
for the evil, I answer, prolong the course of your rotation until

ROTATION OF CROPS. 265

the vegetable matter in the soil has passed into a putrid, or
dissolving state. Then it will be easily taken up and used by
the minute spongioles of the grass roots, and so assimilate itself
with the plants. But more of this hereafter.

A third general principle mentioned above was, that due
regard should be had to the place that each crop occupies in
the course. Thisisa point of some importance. For instance,
it has been observed that oats rarely do well, coming the next
year after the turf is broken, being liable to blast; probably
owing to the peculiar condition of the soil at the time. Corn
hardly ever produces well after buckwheat; while, on the other
hand, it is well known that potatoes and broomcorn are excel-
lent preparatives for wheat and rye.

I am now prepared to state, affirmatively, what I should con-
sider the proper course to be pursued with a reasonable pros-
pect of success, making no claims, however, to infallibility, but
bespeaking a candid consideration. Actual experiment, it may
be truly said, is the only sure test of the views presented, and
to that ordeal I am willing they should be submitted. Our
situation in the Valley of the Connecticut, occasioning, as it does,,
some peculiarities in our agricultural practice, will lead me to
speak of three different systems of rotation, applicable to differ-
ent soils and localities. I shall begin with meadow lands,
meaning by this, of course, arable meadows, or those that are
seldom or never flooded. Probably no one crop occupies so
much of these lands as broomcorn. This is an important
staple with us. The brush generally finds a ready market at a
remunerating price, while the seed constitutes a valuable
provender, and the crop is not an exhausting one. Its natural
home seems to be upon alluvial flats; and here, accordingly, we
find it in its greatest perfection. Evidently, then, it must
occupy a large space in these localities. At any rate, owing to
the natural fertility of the soil and to the ease with which they
are tilled, hoed crops of some kind will always occupy a large
proportion of our lands. Thus much I am willing to concede;
but I maintain, notwithstanding, that there is injury often done
in keeping these lands up too long. I have in mind one marked
instance, in which a lot had been kept so long under the plough,
that a heavy dressing of manure failed to produce what might

; 34%

266 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

be considered an ordinary yield; and this, too, upon land
naturally very favorable to the crop. Five or six years are as
many as ought to be devoted to hoed crops. Then let wheat,
rye or oats follow with grass seeds. After remaining in grass,
say three years, it will be again in good condition for the plough.
Here is a nine years’ course, viz.: five in broomcorn, or other
hoed crops; one in rye and three in grass. Let us compare
it with nine years of broomcorn alone. I will suppose five
hundred fifty pounds to be an average yield, with six loads of
manure dropped in the hill. This, for nine years, will amount
to four thousand nine hundred fifty pounds; which, at six cents
per pound, is two hundred ninety-seven dollars. Estimating
seed at fifty-five bushels per acre, we have, for nine years, four
hundred ninety-five bushels. This, at twenty-five cents, amounts
to one hundred twenty-three dollars seventy-five cents; which,
added to the price of the brush, makes four hundred twenty
dollars seventy-five cents. Deduct, for tillage and interest,
twenty dollars a year for nine years, and we have as a result,
two hundred forty dollars seventy-five cents. Now, if we apply
fifty-four loads of manure in five years, instead of nine, we may
reasonably calculate upon an increase of at least two hundred
pounds per acre. Seven hundred and fifty pounds for five
years, amounts to three thousand seven hundred and fifty pounds.
This, at six cents, amounts to two hundred twenty-five dollars.
Estimating seed at seventy-five bushels, we have, for the five
years, three hundred seventy-five bushels, which, at twenty-five
cents, would be ninety-three dollars twenty-five cents. This,
added to the price of the brush, as before, makes three hundred
eighteen dollars ninety-five cents. Deduct one hundred dollars
for tillage and interest, and there remains two hundred
eighteen dollars seventy-five cents; only twenty-two dollars
less than would be obtained by the cther method, and which a
good crop of wheat or rye would of itself cover, leaving the
three years of grass as clear gain, Having thus given my views
in regard to a rotation of crops upon lands naturally favorable
to cultivation, it may be as well to speak of a kind, the very
opposite of this, viz.: those lands which, owing to their distance
from the homestead, their inaccessibility, or their unfriendliness
to cultivation, it is desirable to keep most of the time in grass.

ROTATION OF CROPS. 267

Here, our course will not admit of more than one hoed crop,
which should be followed by oats, barley or spring wheat. It
should be recollected that in this course the great object is to
secure a good growth of grass. In order to this, there should
be but one ploughing, and that should be thoroughly done.
The manure should be composted, spread upon the surface and
harrowed in. The next spring after the first crop has been
taken off, if it has been in corn, the stubble should be cut off
close to the ground with a bog hoe. Then go over the ground
with a heavy ox-cultivator, until the hills are torn up and the
whole well pulverized. The ground is now ready for the grain
and grass seeds; and, if the cultivation has been what it ought,
there will be a reasonable prospect of success in the under-
taking. Care should be taken throughout not to disturb the
old sod, as the object is to create a fine tilth upon the surface.
The other course, of which I am to speak, occupies a middle
ground between the two already discussed. This course ex-
tends through eight years—four in grass and four in cultivated
crops. The first crop, on breaking up the sod, may be either
Indian or broomecorn, according to the character of the soil;
the next rye or wheat. Oats are not as good, unless they are
cut before they are ripe and used as hay; for they are very
liable to blast, when sown upon the partially rotted turf. An
excellent plan—when it can be readily carried out—is to turn
under the stubble, from which the grain is taken, near the latter
part of July; and then to sow turnip seed in drills, putting fine
compost into the drills; or, when this is not to be had, ashes
or guano may be strewed upon the top of the hills before the
plants are up, which gives them a vigorous start. Turnips, if
they are kept clean, will leave the land in fine condition for the
succeeding crop, which may be roots; or, if these are not culti-
vated, corn again. I have known corn to do remarkably well
coming as a third crop; in one instance, producing fifty bushels
per acre; and this on land naturally not at all favorable to its
production. By the end of this year, if there has been proper
cultivation, the land will be ready for grass seed, which may be
sown the next spring, in connection with oats or barley.

Tn all that has been said thus far, I suppose a liberal supply
of manure. No good farmer will think of conducting his opera-

268 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

tions without it; but afew words in closing, on its proper
application, may not be inappropriate. In the last course of
which I have been speaking, it is supposed that manure is
applied to both of the hoed crops; that is to say, in the first
and third year. In both instances it should be ploughed in;
because, in the first year, if so applied, it helps materially in
the decomposition of the sod, and so promotes the growth of
the crop; and, in the third year, if it is buried with the plough,
it will be brought to the surface again the next spring, well
fitted to be used by the grass seeds. Much of our land pays
well for manuring in the hill, in addition to what is ploughed
in. All cold lands, especially, need this, in order to give the
corn a vigorous start. Ashes and plaster answer well for this
purpose, used upon an inverted sward; but if corn is grown
asa third crop, it is better to usé the compost. In laying
down lands to grass, great good would result from the use of
ashes, plaster, and perhaps lime.

I close, here, not because the subject is exhausted. My ob-
ject has been to excite inquiry and improvement in this branch
of our profession. .

STOCK.
MASSACHUSETTS.

Report of the Trustees.

The sole purpose and object, for some years past, has been
the improvement of stock. In the opinion of the trustees of
this society, it is desirable that practical farmers should be
duly impressed with the importance of raising breeds of neat
cattle, with a special object; either for the dairy, for draught,
beef, or any other desirable purpose, and that they should be
convinced that the given object in each case cannot well be
secured, without great care in selecting the finest animals for
breeding. While well aware that fine specimens of animals of
this description are often found in what is called our native

STOCK. 269

stock, the trustees think it quite too much to assume that this
stock is susceptible of no improvement by the introduction of
animals from abroad, belonging to races of high and long
established character, and they feel convinced that such im-
provement has taken place already, by the introduction, at dif-
ferent times, of foreign races; though the improvement may
not have been, with respect to horned cattle, very extensive, or
very easy to be traced. But when we see how much has been
done for our sheep by the introduction of the Spanish Merino,
and for swine, both here and elsewhere, by importations from
Europe and China, it would be premature to give up all hope
of any benefit from the introduction of larger domestic animals
from the Old World. At any rate, it cannot be doubted that
the importation of fine specimens of neat cattle has produced
greater earnestness and circumspection in some districts, at
least, in selecting breeding animals from our native races; a
practice on which there cannot well be any diversity of opin-
ion, and on which we must, after all, rely principally, for a long
time at least, for any extensive improvement in our stock.

The above considerations have never been disregarded by
the trustees of this society, but they do not deem it necessary,
at present, to speak of anything done in pursuance of them,
previous to the year 1845. In that year, the trustees imported
several fine animals of the Ayrshire and North Devon breeds,
and purchased others imported by Mr. Randall, of New Bed-
ford. In the course of seven years they were enabled to dis-
tribute a full-blooded pair of one of these breeds to every
county agricultural society, and one pair to the State Reform
School. They thought that in no way could the advantages,
which might result from the procuring of this stock, be more
extensively diffused. They cannot speak with precision of the
result, as, notwithstanding the time which has elapsed, no re-
ports have been received from the county societies sufficiently
in detail to enable the trustees to determine the success or
failure of the experiment in the character of the young stock.
In the year 1851, the treasurer, Mr. Motley, went to England
for the purpose of selecting a few fine animals of the Jersey
(commonly called in this country the Alderney) breed, with
authority to expend for that purpose, a sum not exceeding

270 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

$2,500. <A full report in relation to these animals was made
the last year. The stock is still in the care and keeping of
Mr. Motley, and too few in number, to warrant the trustees in
distributing or disposing of any of them. No evidence has
appeared tending to diminish the reputation of this race for
singular richness of milk, or to lead the trustees to question
their ability to sustain the cold or heat of our climate. The
following extract of a report made to the trustees by Mr.
Motley, will show his opinion of their value, sustained by facts
within his knowledge.

JoHNn ©. Gray, President.
BenyamMin GUILD, Secretary.

Report of Mr. Moiley.,

From my monthly reports the trustees have been kept in-
formed of the general health and condition of the animals
belonging to the society. I now submit some remarks as to
the value of the Jersey breed of cows for general use.

It has been stated that the quantity of milk given by them
was so small, that it was not made up by the excellence in
quality. From my experience, I am quite satisfied, that even
in quantity, they are fully equal to the average of any other
breed of cows. I do not presume to say, that they give so
large a quantity as some cows at the height of their flow, but
that they hold out longer and are more equal through the year.
For example, the heifer “ Minna,” to calve January 24, 1854, is
now giving four quarts (beer measure) per day, and all the
other cows are giving from six to eight quarts per day. The
milkmen are willing to pay more for this milk than for that
from common cows, finding that there are people who know
the difference between milk that will produce cream, and that
which will not, and will pay a much higher price for it. As to
quality, no one disputes that the milk from the Jersey cow is
infinitely superior to any other. I have been induced to try
the experiment of how much butter one cow could make in the
year, and thus far, she has exceeded my expectations. From
May 18th to November 9th,—being twenty-six weeks,—she has
made three hundred and sixteen pounds and seven ounces, being

STOCK. 271

an average of twelve pounds and three ounces per week, and is
now making nine pounds per week. This is an amount which
I think has hardly been exceeded for a cow of her age—four
years.

In addition to the animals of this breed imported for the
society within the last two years, I have imported twelve cows
for myself and other individuals, and I believe they have all
given entire satisfaction.

Between five and six quarts of their milk will make a pound
of butter, on an average, and even less than four quarts, has
produced that amount.

Another year will give us an opportunity of testing the value
of the half-bloods, and when judicious crosses have been made,
I look for some very superior milkers.

West Roxrury, December 10th, 1853.

The following additional particulars have been furnished me
by the treasurer of the State Society, in connection with the
plates of the animals which appear in this volume.

The Jersey cow, “Countess,” was imported by Mr. Thomas
Motley, Jr., for the Massachusetts Society for Promoting Agri-
culture, in May, 1851. She was purchased by him in the Island
of Jersey. She is now seven years old. She gives, at her
flow, fourteen quarts of milk, per day, and has given twelve
pounds of butter, per week, upon pasture alone. March 16,
1853, the milk she gave the preceding week, made six pounds
of butter, having dropped her calf more than nine months
before.

The Jersey heifer, “ Minna,” was imported at the same time,
for the society. She is now four years old. April 2d, 1853,
she calved. April 20th, the milk she gave the preceding week
made ten pounds butter. April 27th, one week, twelve and a
quarter pounds; feed, plenty of good hay and three quarts corn
and cob meal per day. She gave milk to within thirty days of
calving the past winter, and never less than three quarts.

The bull “Colonel” was imported at the same time for the
Massachusetts Society.

The Jersey cow “Flora” is five years old this spring; im-

272 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

ported at the same time by Mr. Motley for himself. From May
18, 1853, to March 8th, 1854, she has made four hundred and
sixty-three pounds butter. Until Nov. 14th, she had nothing
but what she got in the pasture, with the exception that she
had a feed of corn fodder morning and night during part of
August, September and October, when the pastures were very
much parched up. This winter her feed has been two quarts
corn and cob meal; about two pecks carrots per day, and oat
straw.

In addition to the above, a manuscript letter of the Hon.
Timothy Pickering, addressed to a distinguished farmer of
Essex County, has been placed in my hands, and is of such
interest, both as throwing light on the earlier importations of
the Alderney breed, and as coming from so distinguished a
friend of agriculture, that it is given in this connection.

Satem, October 13th, 1826.

Dear Sir :—As you are to receive the Alderney bull in be-
half of the Agricultural Society, I enclose the paper describing
his qualities, and those of the Alderney breed, which I gave to
Brown, when sent with the bull last summer, among the farm-
ers. I now add further information, from the letter of my
friend, Reuben Haines, of Germantown, near Philadelphia, ad-
dressed to Judge Peters, who is President of the Philadelphia
Society of Agriculture, and which has been lately published
in the fifth volume of the Memoirs of that Society. Mr. Haines’
letter is dated in October, 1818, and further experience of his
Alderney breed enabled him to confirm what he had written in
1818, by a letter to the Pennsylvania Agricultural Society, only
two or three years ago. This volume I have seen, but do not
possess it. The letter first mentioned is as follows, as ad-
dressed to Judge Peters :—

“GERMANTOWN, October 20, 1818.
“With this you will receive a pound of butter, made from the
Alderney cow, imported in 1815, and now in my possession,
She calved on the 13th of last month, and is now in fine condi-

o)

ok jose by 2 3 are
Bays | a

Wi ye

UJ 7 § fl a D
= _ . te ne. Ay} : SS ke aa Stipa
me —) : Ue

WteA Fain

As Ww et i} a ee
. va ish y ANCE cola

ait” a
eo

AANGHOW PSO {f AOYDOW' § OYL JO Aptodety
VuaOTH MOO ASUar

WALL OLY St ILLPUU YD MY yy

We

cae, mn
SESS eats

STOCK. 273

tion, running on excellent pasture of orchard grass and white
clover, and gives, on an average, about fourteen quarts of milk
per day. From this quantity, during the week ending the 7th
instant, we obtained ten quarts of cream, which produced eight
pounds and two ounces of butter; and the week succeeding,
ten and a half quarts, which gave eight pounds and three-quar-
ters of the quality of the sample sent. You will perceive it is
of so rich a yellow, that it might be suspected some foreign
coloring matter had been added to it; but you may rely on it
this is not the case. I may add, that one of the good proper-
ties of this valuable breed of cattle is the ease with which the
cream is churned, requiring but a few minutes to convert it
into butter.
T remain, &c.,
REUBEN HArINEs.”

T have been well acquainted with Mr. Haines. He sustains
an unblemished character, and his statements may be entirely
relied on. bj i * a * bi

With great regard,
I am your ob’t serv’t,
T. PICKERING.

‘The following is the paper referred to :—

To the farmers of Essex :—

As the principal object in keeping cows in this county is to
supply the market towns with butter, it was clearly expedient
that the farmers should possess themselves of a breed best
adapted to furnish that article. Of all breeds known in Eng-
land, that called the Alderney is acknowledged to be superior
to any other for butter, according to their size, or, as the
English writers express it—the Alderney cows yield more
butter than any other breed, “for their inches.” Being satis-
fied of this, I wrote to Gorham Parsons, Esq., of Brighton, (a
native of Essex, and owner of a valuable farm in Byfield,) to
know on what terms he would let me have his bull, for a year
or more, to send round among the farmers of the county, for

35*

274 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

the purpose of improving their dairies by raising calves from
their best cows, with this Alderney cross.

On the 31st of October last, I received Mr. Parsons’ liberal
answer, that, for the object I had mentioned, “I might have the
bull so long as I should think him useful, free of any expense
whatever.” He thinks the Alderney a very valuable breed.
After I had decided to take his bull for the use of this county,
Mr. Parsons purchased an Alderney bull calf in his neighbor-
hood, at the price of fifty dollars, to serve his heifers the pres-

ent season.

* * * x b

*% * * * %

The bull has been at my farm, in Wenham, since the begin-
ning of last November, and all the time in fine plight, though
fed during the winter on low ground meadow hay. Mr. Par-
sons having so fed him, and informing me that he required no
better keeping; that is, while not put to cows. I shall do
myself what I recommend to others—raise all his calves from
my best cows. Mr. Parsons, in his letter before mentioned,
remarked “that the bull was perfectly gentle ;” and so he was
found. But to keep any bull gentle, he must be used gently.
The tamest, by rough usage, may become ungentle.

T. PICKERING.
Satem, May 31, 1826.

This paper was taken about the county by Mr. Brown, who
had charge of the bull, and who had directions to stay only
about two days at the principal towns, and to give notice to
others of his progress.

The crosses produced in this way became distinguished, in
particular localities, for the richness of their milk.

The North Devon bull, Earl of Leicester, owned by Nathan-
iel Dodge, of Sutton, Worcester County, Mass., that took the
first prize at one year old, in 1852, also the first prize at two
years old, in 1853, was raised by Mr. Dodge, and will be three
years old the 29th of May, 1854. Larl of Leicester was sired
by full blood bull Roebuck, and out of Beauty, now owned by
Mr. Dodge, and formerly from the Patterson stock of North

STOCK. 275

Devons. Roebuck, the sire of this bull, was sired by Bloom-
field, and imported by the Massachusetts State Society in 1846
direct from the Earl of Leicester’s celebrated North Devon
stock.

Roebuck is now the property of the Massachusetts Society,
and was put under the care of the Worcester County Society,
,and was kept for service at the farm of Harvey Dodge, of
Sutton, from 1849, until the spring of 1853. He was con-
sidered the strongest blooded as well as best formed bull
from that importation. He was not only the getter of Earl
of Leicester, but also of the balance of his beautiful North
Devon stock, consisting of some twenty-five head, except his
last spring calves, which were sired by Earl of Leicester.

The following remarks on the stock of New England, by
Hon. J. W. Procror, are taken from the Essex Transactions :—

What class of cattle is best fitted to the farms of New
England, taking into view their cost, their feed, their uses and
their products, is the theme proposed for consideration. All
will readily admit, that the farmer who expects to live by farm-
ing, must keep within the means at his command, in stocking
his farm. There isa fitness of proportion in these things that
cannot be deviated from, with impunity. The farmer cannot
indulge in fancy stocks. He must procure such as will pay,
and none others.

Massachusetts has ever been under obligations to the adjoin-
ing States at the North, for many of the best animals in her
stall—especially oxen for labor, and cows for the dairy—the
main purposes for which animals are kept on our farms. To
be sure, occasionally a pair of cattle, or a cow, is fed for beef,
after they have passed their period of usefulness in other de-
partments, but this is not the purpose for which they are kept.

Of the comparative value of our native stock for beef, I do
not presume to speak, for in this my experience will not war-
rant the expression of anopinion. If hearsay is to be credited,
I should suppose the Durhams would have the preference, so far
as size is taken into view; but whether this size can be at-
tained without a proportionate expenditure for feed, i am not

2716 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

advised. It is of little use to erow a great calf, when it costs
twice his value to feed bim. Many such have come to my
knowledge.

It is so fashionable, of late, to regard the Durhams, the
Devons, the Ayrshires, the Alderneys, and others, with foreign
appellations, as the only stock worthy of notice, that the
humble animals springing up on our hills, with no pedigree
attached, are shoved one side, or are allowed to occupy only”
the lean-to back of the stable, and to feed upon the crumbs
that fall from their betters’ table.

I would not be understood as in any manner finding fault
with the beautiful animals recently imported, with hair so sleek
and forms so symmetrical. JI admire their appearance. I am
well persuaded much may be learned by tracing their history,
and ascertaining the means by which they have been thus per-
fected. Great credit is due to those careful observers of the
laws of nature who have brought about these improvements,
and thereby established principles to be applied by others;
and to these public spirited citizens who have given us an
opportunity to examine and understand them. While all this
may be very well for those who can afford it, it is a movement
in which the common farmers cannot participate, to any con-
siderable extent at least, because they cannot afford it.
Farmers, like others, must cut their garments according to
their cloth. What I would say is, let the same care be used in
selecting the best specimens of our native breed of animals,
and the same expense be applied in feeding them, I am yet to
be assured that they will be found inferior to the best imported.

It is not enough that these imported animals have a supe-
riority of mein when first presented; they should be summered
and wintered, and pass through the third and fourth genera-
tions, before their merits can be fairly tested. Let them be
fed at the same table, and with the same fare, from the begin-
ning to the end of the year, and see how they will come out
after this. I have seen them, when first brought forward,
assuming an air of consequence, not unlike the whiskered
dandy from the city, when he passes the ploughboy from the
country, arrayed in his frock and trowsers; but when hitched

STOCK. 27T

to the plough, or drained into the pail, th’s consequential air
dwindled into insignificance.

I have witnessed not less than forty ploughing matches, with
an average of twenty ox-teams in each; but I do not remember
a single instance where any superiority of power was mani-
fested in their operations, by the imported over the native
cattle. If they possess the power, would it not have been
made apparent under such circumstances? I have known
attempts to exclude expert ploughmen from holding the plough,
but I never knew of any attempt to exclude expert oxen from
drawing it, and if I had, I query whether the slow moulded
Durhams would have been thus privileged. I have seen the
massive Durhams, the descendants of the far famed Denton, of
Northborough, moving in the ploughing field, side by side with
the snug-built, bright-eyed native ox from Sutton—a little more
than half as large—and was constrained to say, that the work
was quite as well done by the latter as the former. If you
were about to select your man for promptness and expertness
of labor, would you take the largest to be found? By no
means. I have seen the snug-built little man, weighing not over
one hundred and sixty pounds, who would lay on his back the
largest lubber thatcome along. The same rule applies to oxen
for labor.

Our milch cows, for the making of butter and cheese, the.
primary object for which they are kept on most farms, are cer-
tainly not inferior to any others. In expressing this opinion,
I take into view their feed as well as their products. I have
seen many cows within thirty years, and the very best I have
seen have been native. Such was the opinion of Timothy
Pickering and John Lowell, gentlemen of as discriminating
observation and high character for intelligence and truth as
any others. Not speculators in stock—with no prejudices to
conquer, or preferences toaward. That I may not do injustice
to these venerable pioneers in improvements, who did more in
Massachusetts to awaken public attention to the interests of
the farmer than all others, I beg leave to quote a single sen-
tence from a report submitted by Mr. Lowell, on milch cows,
exhibited at the show in Brighton, October, 1822, when Mr,

278 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

Pickering was associated with him on the committee; and I
myself was present, a stripling, looking on. Says he :—

“ Although the milch cows of Great Britain and the Nether-
lands are in general far superior to our own, I have never seen
an imported cow with equal merit with some of our own, that
have been here offered. So fully am I convinced of this truth,
as well as that our country possesses a very considerable
number of these fine cows, that Iam persuaded that if Great
Britain or the Netherlands were to send us ten cows, selected,
each of the best quality there to be found, New England alone
would furnish twenty that would equal them in the quantity of
milk, butter and cheese they would respectively produce.”’*

This was not a shot at random, by those who did not know
what they were aiming at; but it was said by those who knew
what they were saying, in a manner most deliberate, and who
stood ready to maintain what they had asserted. Let those
who have had more experience, and who possess more wisdom,
than did these gentlemen, (one of whom was eighty, and the
other about seventy at this time,) come forth and declare it.
I beg leave to refer also to the discussion carried on between
Messrs. Pickering, of Salem, and Powell, of Philadelphia, pub-
lished in the New England Farmer, in 1825, where the argu-
ments on both sides of this subject are fully drawn out, according
to the light then existing, and I think if doubts remain on the
minds of any, the perusal of those papers will remove them. I
remember to have read them since with much instruction.

Where can there be found an animal excelling the Oakes cow
for butter making properties? I confess I have a local pride
in sustaining the reputation of this animal. She was first
brought into notice in the humble town in which I reside. She
was a small-sized, ordinary looking cow, with a small head and
neck, straight back, and broad hind parts, with milk vessels of

* It will be noticed that the writer of this paragraph admits every thing for which
the friends of improvement contend, that ‘the milch cows of Great Britain, &c., are
in general superior, &c. No one would deny that occasionally we find a “native”
equal, and perhaps superior, to most full bloods, yet these are accidental cases, and
do not produce their like, as is the case with strongly marked breeds. When our
**natives”’ are in general equal to the races which have been built up by a long
eourse of judicious treatment, we can with justice recommend them as superior to
all others,—Ep.

STOCK. 279

best form and capacity. She was taken, when about two years
old, by a farmer in Danvers, from a drove on its way from
Maine to Brighton, without any certificate of pedigree, as many
have been taken, and proving to be a good milker, was sold
to his brother Oakes, a shoe manufacturer, to afford milk for
his family. Her extraordinary butter-making qualities coming
to the knowledge of HE. H. Derby, Esq., one of the trustees of
the Massachusetts Society, he requested Mr. Oakes to take
account of what she did. This was done in the year 1816—
when, from May 17th, (when her calf was killed,) to the 20th
of December next following, she yielded sixteen pounds of
butter a week, on an average, besides one quart of milk a day
for the use of the family. Of the truth of this statement there
is not a shadow of doubt. But it may be said she was high fed,
or she never could have done this. So be it. Can it be
expected of any animal to create such a produce out of nothing ?
Suppose a cow to yield twenty quarts of milk a day through the
year, how much would be the weight of the milk? IfI figure
right, 15,600 pounds, or nearly eight tons. Can this be expect-
ed of a cow without something to feed on? But the Oakes
cow does not stand alone. Several others, in the County of
Essex, have come to my knowledge, that yielded from seventeen
to twenty pounds of butter a week, for several weeks together ;
but none so large a quantity, for so long a time, as the Oakes
cow. These were all natives.*

Until well authenticated accounts of better products can be
had, I will not yield the claim of our native stock for their
butter-making qualities, to any class of horns whatever. That
the Jersey cattle afford superior milk, which will yield more
butter from the same quantity, I readily admit; but that they
are better stock for dairy purposes, taking into view quantity
and quality of milk, and expense of feed, remains to be proved.
Until proved I must beg leave to doubt.

* The Oakes cow was bought from a drove which came from the regions of the
Kennebeck, where many full bloods had been imported. It is not known how
much of this foreign blood she possessed, if any. She had the straight back of the
Durham. It is well known that, when making so much butter, she drank all her
own milk, (skimmed,) and a bushel of meal per week mixed with it. By this un-
natural an:| injudicious treatment she was ruined. None of her offspring were
equal in any degree to herself. The celebrated Gore breed came from the same
vicinity about the same time.—Eb.

280 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

a“

Without doubt, benefit may accrue from crossing the best of
imported animals with the best of our own. This was recom-
mended by Messrs. Pickering and Lowell, before named; and
this has been recommended by all intelligent men who have
given attention to the subject. This has been attempted by
the Massachusetts Society for the Promotion of Agriculture.
At great expense they have imported animals, selected with
the best of care for this purpose. They have generously placed
them in the different counties of the Commonwealth, and called
on the farmers to take advantage of their offers. From some
of the counties they have had favorable returns, Worcester in
particular, but generally not so. In Essex, I remember, we
were favored with the offer of a bull. After deliberation by
the trustees, they concluded to take an Ayrshire animal, and
appointed two of their most experienced men from the best
stock raising towns, Andover and Newbury, to select him. He
was received with all thankfulness—kept at an expense of
about two dollars a week—stationed in different towns, and
advertised in the Gazette, for a period of two years, and finally
died and was buried without ceremony. You may ask what
was the result of all this? According to the best information
I can obtain, some of his progeny were fair looking animals,
but, as a whole, the value of all that remain, distinctly marked
as his descendants, would not pay the expense of his: keeping.*
The inference must be, that the farmers did not think much of
the animal, or that he was not worth keeping. I speak of this
animal, because I happened to know his entire history; like
unfayorable accounts I have heard from other counties. Al-
though thousands of dollars have been expended by the Massa-
chusetts Society, in introducing and spreading abroad foreign
animals, I have great doubts whether any benefits have resulted
from these operations.

Twenty-five years ago, Gorham Parsons, Hsq., at the solici-

* The reason of this was that this bull was sickly, and got but very few calves.
He was found to be so uncertain, (a fact that was not, and could not have been
known to those who selected him, and who had but #0 to select from,) that no
farmer dared to risk him; not that any one lacked confidence in the breed, but that
he was very rarely successful. Those that he did get, of which several are still liv-
ing, are superior animals,—Ep,

oe

Rares bpp ee
ES ROCs
“as ‘

fs ae

OW Chandier & Bro. dith

JERSEY HEIFER DAISY 20 MOS OLD
Property of Geo H. Frencde, Andover.

7 :
ia ni Pa)
d
i!
i) ee : A ‘
iT ieaige

AAV = : rye

que " on

|

1) are
1) ty hy ‘ay

ee) ae
Te) ot ee

STOCK. | 281

tation of Col. Pickering, then president of the Essex County
Society, presented the Society with an Alderney bull, of supe-
rior promise. He was stationed at West Newbury, on the
farm of Mr. Newell, where he remained for several years, and
was favorably regarded. I am informed by that gentleman that
his progeny still remain in the town, and that they have some
of the peculiar characteristics of the race, especially in the
quality of their milk, clearly showing, what has been asserted
by Col. Jaques and other growers of fancy animals, that the
influence of the male in raising good stock for the dairy, is
quite as important as that of the female. Farmers who pre-
sume to keep an inferior brat of a bull as the associate of their
cows, make a great mistake. Keep well formed bulls only,
and such as have come from cows of good character for milk,
both quantity and quality—the latter is quite as important as the
former, for all purposes except for sale in the market, and for
that also, when the tricks of the trade are fully understood.

It was a favorite notion of Col. Pickering, to improve our
dairy stock by rearing the offspring of those cows which had
proved good, and by giving premiums for such, and such only.
And to do this, to give encouragement to those who would bring
forward the offspring of such cows when they arrived at matu-
rity. But so little of system is there in the movements of our
Agricultural Societies, governed by officers chosen annually,
and by committees of a mushroom’s growth—here to-day and
gone to-morrow—that Iam not able to say that any decided
benefit has resulted from these offers, though it is easy to see
that they embrace the only rational mode of bringing about
valuable improvements. Suppose Coke or Bakewell had oper-
ated with as little regard to system as we do, when would their
improvements have been perfected? The truth is, if we would
have any thing valuable we must labor for it. There is no pro-
priety in awarding premiums for animals that chance to be good.
It is those which are made good by care and attention that are
to be rewarded, and those only.

A short time since I visited the farm of a gentleman, adjoin-
ing the farm of my father, who has spared no effort to secure a
superior dairy stock. He had Durhams, Devons and natives,
with an expectation of Alderneys, all at the highest prices, av-

36*

282 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

eraging not less than $75-an animal. On inquiry of his herdsman
which was the best cow for milk in the yard, (and there were a -
dozen or more there,) the answer was, “that dark-colored,
crumpled horn, raw-boned, ill-looking cow; she gives more and
better milk than any cow in the yard.” After what I have
said, it is perhaps, unnecessary for me to say she was a native.
I appeal to farmers whether they have not witnessed some-
thing of the same kind in their own herds. He that selects an
animal for milk because her form is comely, or her face beauti-
ful, is in great danger of being deceived in his choice. There
are other indices of quality much more certain, not omitting the
far-famed escutcheon index of Guenon—of which I have heard
much and know little—but what I do know is decidedly in its
favor. No man who would have a good dairy stock should be
unmindful of this sign.

On a recent visit to the farm of Mr. Payson, of Rowley, he
informed me that within ten years last past he had examined
and carefully tested the qualities of more than one thousand
milch cows, of every name and variety, and he frankly stated,
that the best milkers he had ever met, take them individually
or as a class, came from the droves gathered in Maine or New
Hampshire. In selecting these animals he had regard to their
external characteristics mainly, their form, their build, their gen-
eral expression, such as an experienced eye embraces, although
there may be no word to give it. Said Mr. Payson: “ When
the merits of imported animals have been blazoned abroad, and
the defects of native carefully exaggerated, I have sometimes
thought that the sin of the owner was laid at the door of the
brute beast. No matter by what name your cattle are known,
or how complicated may be their pedigree, so long as they
are not well fed and cared for, they will be no better than the
ill-formed native stock, which, in many places, like the lean kine
of Pharoah, seem to be ‘forsaken of God and abused by man.’”’
At the same time, as I passed through his extended barns, I
saw a young Jersey bull, recently obtained of Mr. Motley, from
the Massachusetts importation, at a cost proportioned to his
reputation, carefully boxed up in the barn, and fed on the best
that could be furnished; while natives of the same age were
gnawing the parched herbage on gravelly knolls, with no one

STOCK. 283

to sympathize in their short comings. Why this distinction in
the treatment of these animals? How does this compare with
the gentleman’s remark just quoted, from his truly sensible ad-
dress before the county society? The fact is, these animals
cost more; therefore, according to the rule laid down by Hudi-
bras, they are taken to be worth more,

“The worth of a thing
Being so much money as it will bring.”

Our farmers cannot afford to feed stock as these imported
animals require to be fed. In 1848, Mr. Phinney, of Lexing-
ton, who had the stock of the State Society in his keeping, re-
ported their bill of fare to be twenty pounds of English hay,
two quarts of Indian meal, and a peck of carrots to each animal
over one year old, daily. This report was sanctioned by the
trustees of the State Society, and endorsed by Abbott Law-
rence and others, whose authority as indorsers will not any-
where be questioned. Let us look at this feed and see for
what it can be afforded. Twenty pounds of hay must cost at
least fifteen cents, two quarts of Indian meal at least five cents,
a peck of carrots at least five cents, the care of the animal at
least five cents; so that the daily board and keeping will be
thirty cents, or, with a little nipping on Sunday, two dollars a
week. What farmer can afford to keep cows thus, when the
returns of a good dairy stock, as they average, are not equal
to more than half this amount? It is a good herd of milking
cows where the cows, on an average, yield milk that sells for
five dollars a month through the year. Farmers cannot afford
to keep cows whose milk will not pay for their feed. There
must have been some misapprehension on the part of Mr. Phin-
ney, who was reputed to be fully informed in the mysteries
farming like a gentleman, or else the class of animals he had in
keeping will not answer for New England farms. Facts are
stubborn things, as every man who attempts to gain a living by
farming, sooner or later learns.

In confirmation of the foregoing views, I beg leave to quote
a part of a letter, written to me on the 8th of August last, by
the “model farmer” of Plymouth County, a gentleman of as
much experience and observation in farming as any other in,

284 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

Massachusetts, at the present time. “It is,” says the Hon. Mr.
Allen, “the work of time to determine the true character of
imported animals. They are long affected by the change from
the milder climate of Europe to that of New England. When
these animals become partially acclimated, and pass from the
provident care and critical attention of the importers to some
purchasers with extravagant expectations, another trying change
is passed, and defects not unfrequently ascribed to the animal
which should be accounted for from the management. Has it
not been by some process like this, that the Ayrshire cows
have fallen into disrepute? The points in those animals cer-
tainly indicate an aptitude to secrete milk. The Durham cattle
are pronounced by many to be too tender for this climate, but
with proper attention they are profitably raised for beef; and
crosses with this breed have given us some fine cows, and de-
cent working oxen—more remarkable, however, for size than
any other quality. The greatest benefit which has been realized
from imported cattle, has been realized in crosses with those
ealled native. This, if judiciously pursued, will tend to preserve
a healthy and thrifty race. As at present advised, I should
prefer to have the Devon blood predominate. Strength of con-
stitution to endure the rigors of the climate, and susceptibility
of taking on flesh with ordinary feed, are greater objects with the
generality of farmers, than merely size. Probably there is a
mixture of all the blood now found in Europe in what we call
native stock. Systematic crossings will, no doubt, produce the .
most profitable race for the yoke, the dairy, and the market.”

BULLS.
ESSEX.

From the Report of the Committee.

Twelve bulls were entered for premiums. Eleven only
were upon the ground. The Alderney bull entered by Mr.
Waters, was wanting. The committee were sorry that they
did not have an opportunity to examine this bull in com-

BULLS. 285

pany with his brethren of different blood. Besides, a full
blooded Alderney is an animal which has never been exhibited
at our show, and from the reputation of the stock, and the real
beauty of the animal, would have attracted much attention.

Dr. Robinson, of West Newbury, entered a bull three years
old, one-quarter native, and three-fourths North Devon. This
bull was a very fine one, combining more good points than any
other upon the ground, and was backed up by two heifer calves
of his getting, which promise not only to be handsome animals,
but good milkers. This is the only certain evidence which can
be furnished a committee of the good qualities of a bull, and
we wish that in all cases, when a bull is offered for premium,
specimens of his stock would accompany him,—so that pre-
miums may be awarded more justly.

A good looking bull was observed by the conan iste? or some
of them, the second day, which was not in the pens the first
day of the show, nor was any entry made of him with the sec-
retary. If he had been properly entered and exhibited, he
would have probably taken the second or third premium.

The chairman of the committee desires to say a word or
two generally, in relation to the awarding of premiums for
bulls, in this county, which may in part as well apply to other
animals.

At one time, a question of great difficulty, which occasioned
much discussion and antagonism among agricultural writers,
was this: “Whether the breed of live stock be susceptible of
the greatest improvement, from properties conspicuous in the
male, or from those conspicuous in the female parent?” Prize
essays have been written, and the subject has been most
thoroughly discussed, until the unanimous verdict of both prac-
tical and scientific observers now is, that, other things being
equal, the male has far more influence than the female in fixing
the characteristics of the progeny. The greatly superior value
which the Bedouin of the desert, places upon his mare, over
his horse, has been frequently and triumphantly cited in oppo-
sition to this theory. But Abd-el-Kader, in his reply to Gen-
eral Daumas, who has just published a work entitled “The
Horse of the Desert,” puts that matter at rest most naturally
and conclusively. The Arab Chief in reply to the French

286 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

General, says: “You ask me why, if the offspring partakes
more of the male than of the female parent, the mares, notwith-
standing, sell for higher prices than the horses. The reason is
this: he who owns or purchases a mare, hopes that all the
while he is making use of her, he will obtain from her a numer-
ous progeny; but he who owns or buys a horse derives from it
no other benefit than its services for the saddle, as the Arabs
never take money for the use of their horses, but lend them
gratuitously.”

This fact being established, every man sees and will admit,
that in the improvement of our cattle, the bull must perform
the most important part. There is no doubt of the truth of
the theory, and being true, how does the practice of our farm-
ers, in the main, conform to it? Why, with some exceptions,
but generally, the calf that comes late in the season, when veal
is at the lowest, and is so diminutive in size as to be of little
value to the butchers, is reared for a stock-getter, for any thing
will do for a bull. Notmany of these animals are exhibited at
our shows, for their owners would be ashamed of them; but a
very large proportion of the calves dropped in this county, are
sired by bulls of this description, raised here, or driven from
the neighboring State of Maine.

One of the exceptions may be as bad, and it is this. Occa-
sionally, a very large bull calf is dropped, and the owner, if he
cannot afford to raise him himself, advertises his wonderful
merits, and some inexperienced man purchases him, for his size
alone, never asking or caring for his ancestry; but his extra-
ordinary size, which may be his worst defect, is regarded as
sufficient to overcome any and all defects. Such animals are
generally pampered, crowded, and kept with a particular eye
to the cattle show. The neighbors, far and near, are called in
to visit him, and an animal well fed, in high condition, with a
sleek coat, is always an object of attraction; for, as has been
well said by an Englishman of good sense, “fat will cover
faults.”

These last find their way surely to the shows, and friends
and neighbors of the owners are all there, prejudiced in their
favor and proclaiming their comparative merits. Now there
are few men in our county, (and I say it with all deference,)

BULLS. 28T

who are judges of cattle, in the highest sense of the word, who
are able to discern merit, or the promise of it, under a rough
skin and an unpampered condition, or who have strength of
mind sufficient to reject a defective form, which, from its sleek
covering and high condition allures the common and unpracticed
eye. The calves got by such bulls would probably be large,
but so coarse in bone and in general characteristics as to be
comparatively useless.

This society, regarding the importance of ‘the bull, have:
always offered liberal premiums for the best animals of this
class, upon condition that they be kept for use within the
county for a certainlength of time. Why thiscondition? For
no other reason than that the stock of the county might be im-
proved by them. A bull, however handsome, has no value in:
himself. It is only his superior geé which makes him valuable.
Now, of all the prize bulls for the last thirty years, what one
of them has been the father of prize bulls? We must look at
things as they are, not as we think they ought to be, and who
ever recollects a bull entered for a premium claiming to be the
offspring of a prize bull.

Now, if the instance cannot be found, or is so rare as to be
an anomaly, are we improving our stock? I heard an intelli-
gent gentleman, a butcher, now sixty-five years old, residing
within the county, who has always had an eye for a good cow,
not long since say that the cows in our county are no better
now than they were forty years ago. If this is not true in its
fullest extent, it comes very nearit. And whyis it? Because
nobody among us breeds cattle with any system, with any
definite object in view, with even the exercise of common judg--
ment. And we might perhaps justly substitute state for county,
excepting those gentlemen who breed purely from imported
stock, which, from their beauty of form, for all of them have
an aptitude to fatten—always command high prices. The great
object of all English breeders of cattle has been to attain the
greatest weight and maturity in the shortest time and on the
least quantity of food. The Alderneys are not included in this
remark, but they have been so little time among us that it is
impossible to speak understandingly in relation to them.

But I cannot go into the subject of breeding. I wish more

288 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

particularly to suggest the adoption of some system by which
committees and competitors shall be governed. The societies
of other States, copying the example of England, have establish-
ed scales of points, by which all the foreign breeds of cattle
are judged, and no animal not having a certain number of points,
can in any event obtain a premium. I hope that the Secretary
of the Board of Agriculture, among all the other good things
which he may recommend, will suggest a scale of points by
which to determine the merits of our native stock, and that it
will be adopted by us. Then every body, competitors as well
as committees, would have something to guide them. Now one
man regards the color and shape of the horns, another the
setting on of the tail, another the shape of the head, one a
coarse, larve framed animal, another a small compact one, and
there are as many different principles, real or imaginary, which
govern men in making up their judgment, as there are judges.
In general now, if a man attends to the condition of his animal,
has him as fat as possible, he is sure ofa premium. These
remarks are made generally without any intention of applying
them to the animals exhibited this year, for they were not so
deserving of any such censure, as oftentimes has been the case
in previous years. They are made simply because an evil
exists which ought to be remedied, and attention is called to
the subject with the hope that the remedy will be applied.

T. HE. Payson, Chairman.

WORCESTER.

From the Report of the Committee on Bulls of One Year
old and under.

The number of entries in this department was unusually
small—only three—two for premium and one for exhibition.

This class of animals is receiving a larger share of the atten-
tion of farmers than formerly, and the notion has now become
pretty generally entertained by them that it costs no more to
keep good breeds of neat stock, than poor or indifferent. Hence
the importance of having our dairy cows and working oxen of
breeds of known excellence for their respective purposes. As

BULLS. 289

most of our farmers depend largely for whatever profits may
be derived from farming operations upon their dairy, it should
be with them a matter of the first moment to secure the best
breeds. That there are found occasionally, in farmers’ yards,
one or two specimens of native breed, or those which are re-
puted such, of superior excellence, is admitted. But is there
any assurance that those qualities will be transmitted to their
offspring by the use of any known native breed? Are not the
repeated failures in the matter an admonition that but little
reliance can be placed upon the experiment ?

No one will question for a moment that our native stock can
be improved. Yet few farmers, it is presumed, have thought
upon any thing like entering upon a systematic courseof breed-
ing, whereby distinct characteristics will become established,
and unfailing properties developed. This is to be the result
of a long course of careful breeding before the public confidence
will be secured in their favor, and until this systematic course is
pursued, and a native breed of known and approved merit is es-
tablished among us, is it not the part of wisdom to avail our-
selves of the experience of those whose attention has been long
directed to that subject, and which has resulted in the produc-
tion of breeds of distinct and unfailing characteristics, and of
known and approved excellence? Hence the Durham, Devon,
Ayrshire, and other foreign breeds of stock, which have been
imported into the country. English stock breeders have long
understood this subject and acted upon it. An English farmer
cannot afford to keep a poor or indifferent breed of stock.
Nor should a Massachusetts—a Worcester County farmer.

The importance of this subject cannot be overstated; and
notwithstanding the few animals seen in the pens to-day, of full
and part blood of foreign breeds, yet the number of improved
stock in the farmers’ yards in this county would be found to be
very limited.

Ava. G. Hitt, Chairman.

at*

290 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

a

From the Report of the Committee on Bulls over one year
old.

The ranks to-day, when properly marshalled, and the roll duly
called, stood as follows :—

Class I. No.1. Devon bull, six years and six months old,
belonging to Massachusetts Society for Promoting Agriculture,
raised in Lexington and kept in this State.

No. 2. Devon bull, three years old, raised in Worcester and
now belonging to Silas Bailey, of Boylston.

No. 3. Bull one-fourth Ayrshire and one-half Galloway, four
years and one month old, raised in Uxbridge, and belonging to
Lewis 8. Taft, of Uxbridge.

No. 4. Durham bull, three years and nine months old, raised
in Vermont, and belonging to Phineas A. Beaman, of Prince-
ton.

No. 5. One bull, part Devon, two years and four months
old, raised in Worcester, and belonging to Walter Bigelow of
Worcester.

No. 6. One bull, half Ayrshire, two years and three months
old, raised in Millbury, and belonging to John Park, of Mill-
bury.

No. 7. One North Devon, two years and three months old,
raised in Sutton, and belonging to Nathaniel Dodge, of Sutton.

Class II. No.1. One tbree-fourths Devon, one year and
one month old, raised in Sutton, and belonging to Harvey
Dodge, of Sutton.

No. 2. One Ayrshire, one year and four months old, raised
in Worcester, and belonging to William 8. Lincoln, of Worces-
ter.

No. 8. One bull, one year and three months old, raised in
Grafton, and entered in the name of Nathan Handy.

The committee congratulate the society upon the unusually
fine display of animals in this department of the exhibition.
The number of entries, in the first class particularly, was quite
as large as usual, and the animals were all of a character to do
credit to the exhibition. In the second class the number of

BULLS. 291

entries was smaller, and the animals presented did not exhibit
as high a degree of exceilence as many of those in the first
class, still the committee were unanimous in the opinion that
they were deserving of the premiums offered by the society.

Gerorce §. Tart, for the Committee.

HAMPDEN.

From the Report of the Comittee.

Bulls and Bull Calves.—The committee on this class of
animals, submit, with a few remarks, the result of their action.
The importance of the subject is our apology for trespassing
our opinions uncalled for. When we realize the fact that the
character of our domestic animals, whether intended for the
dairy, the yoke, the stall, or an earlier readiness for the mar-
ket, as grass fed beef, depends almost entirely upon that of
their parents, we see the necessity of rightly discriminating be-
tween a stock of well established character, and those which
are used by too many as a matter of mere convenience to perpet-
uate their distinctive and widely different qualities. The almost
entire negligence of our farmers generally, in this respect, is
one great cause of just complaint. The unparalleled prices
which have recently been paid by some of the most distin-
guished stock breeders of this country, for selected animals
from the celebrated stock of Thomas Bates and others, in Eng-
land, place this subject in its true light, and entitle them to the
gratitude of every American, for their liberality of mind and
purse. Could we animate our farmers with a portion of that
enterprise and spirit of rivalry upon this subject which was
recently developed by those more immediately interested in
the exhibition of horses in this city, we should see results
which would astonish the most sanguine. Your committee
were pleased in examining the animals presented for their ad-
judication, to notice the improvement already commenced.
Most of them were intimately related to ancestors of high
character; the Durham, Ayrshire, Devon, and native stock,
were all represented, and their various affinities were readily
discovered in another class.

S. W. Harrison, Chairman,

292 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

a

FRANKLIN.

From the Report of the Committee.

The committee on bulls are much pleased to be able to say
that the exhibition exceeded, both in numbers and quality, that
of any previous year since the society was incorporated. The
whole number of entries was eighteen, all of which were ani-
mals that show that the farmers of Franklin County are becom-
ing aware that the short road to a highly improved stock is by
improving the sires.

The importance of good dams cannot be too highly appre-
ciated; but when we remember that the dam can only bring
forward one of her own progeny annually, on which to bestow
her pride, and that the sire, with all the importance of a turkey-
cock, can marshal his fifty or one hundred around him, we see
that by selecting the bulls of the county, there can, in two or
three years, be a change affected in the stock that will add
thousands of dollars to its wealth.

A few years since, an association of ten farmers, of Conway,
boucht a bull, eighteen months old, of the short-horned breed,
for which they paid $100; and it is safe to say that his progeny
were worth, on an average, from five to ten dollars apiece
more than those of ordinary breeds. So with the stock of the
famed Childs’ bull, of Deerfield, fair specimens of which (though
the best) are the Arms’ and Stearns’ cattle, were exhibited last
year and this, from Conway.

Every farmer in Shelburne knows that the character of their
stock has been entirely changed, within a comparatively short
period, by the enterprise of a few individuals, who entered
upon an honorable emulation with each other in procuring the
best possible males from which they breed their domestic
stock.

Our committee believe that your society can in no way do
as much to improve the cattle and cows of the county, as by
increasing the amount and number of your premiums upon
bulls.

They are gratified to know that a distinguished citizen of
our county, (Henry W. Clapp,) has called the attention of its

BULLS. 293

farmers to the subject in a manner that cannot fail to interest,
by the liberal donation of $200 to the one that can carry off
the palm at the annual fair of three New England States. I
trust that the farmers of Franklin will give this offer a hearty
response, as it is a lottery, unlike to others, in which there are
no blanks, though but one capital prize.

Those animals which received the awards, were all of them
of the Durham breed, the merits of which need no encomium
from us, more than a reference to the splendid teams brought
in from Shelburne and Conway last year, and from Shelburne
this, in each of which towns, as has been stated, much attentio
has been paid to crossing with that breed.

G. Dickinson, Chairman.

NORFOLK.

Report of the Committee.

The committee on bulls report that the whole number on
exhibition was ten. After a careful examination of their merits,
and being governed by the importance of encouraging the use,
only, of such animals as are known in pedigree, and of pure
blood, the committee make the following awards :—

Class Devon.—For the best full blood, the first premium to
Aaron Davis Weld, of West Roxbury. For the second best,
the second premium to John 8. Eldridge, of Canton.

Class Ayrshire.—F¥or the best full blood, the first premium
to Lemuel Billings, Quincy. No second premium awarded.

Class Alderney.—For the best full blood, the first premium
to Lyman Kinsley, of Canton. No second premium awarded.

In conclusion, the chairman of the committee submits the
following remarks :—

When we consider the immense loss which is annually sus-
tained by the breeding and rearing of cattle of an ordinary
character, we are impelled to urge upon the attention of our
brother farmers, the absolute importance of improving their
stock, by the introduction of pure blood animals, and of such

294 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

only as are best adapted to the purposes for which they are
wanted.

Much mismanagement and misunderstanding have hitherto
existed in regard to this most necessary department of hus-
bandry. Hence the bad results which have accrued from the
indiscriminate crossing of what are termed native stock with
blood or grade animals, without regard to their distinctive
qualities. For instance, to cross a common cow with the Ayr-
shire bull—her progeny with a Durham—this with a Hereford—
and again, perhaps with a compound of all these bloods—would
be a retrograde movement, rather than any definite approach
towards the object to be attained.

It may then be considered as one of the most important
elements of success to breed from pure blood animals. Appro-
priate treatment and proper food are of great consequence ;
but it is not so much to these that we are indebted, as to the
peculiar tendencies of the race from which we desire to raise
stock. The desideratum which we should seek to supply is the
breed which possesses certain properties, whether for the dairy,
the stall, or the yoke.

To “breed directly in the line,” is now admitted to be the
best, if not the only safe method for the improvement and
perpetuation of the blood; and in all cases from pure blood on
one side, and if possible from the male. The best animals of
the class desired should be selected, and, following down in a
direct line, the purity of the offspring should be maintained,
only changing occasionally from one family (not breed) to
another, to preserve vigor of constitution.

The chairman of the committee, having expressed the above
views, would recommend to the farmers of Norfolk County to
dispense, as far as practicable, with bulls of a nondescript
character, and to avail themselves of such as are known to be
of pure blood,—confining themselves to the class which may be
best adapted to their own locality or purpose. Maturity and
good constitution should be sought for in the dam, in which
case, although the male be young, if healthy and vigorous, her
progeny will be more affected with the general character of the
breed to which he belongs than with his size or age.

MarsuaLut P, WILDER, Chairman.

MILCH COWS. 295

MILCH COWS AND HEIFERS.

ESSEX.

Report of the Committee.

The committee on milch cows regret that there was not a
better show of animals of this class; and indeed they may say
that, for several years past, there has been quite a falling off,
both in numbers and quality, of the cows exhibited at our
shows. It is believed by the committee that there is a large
number of very superior milkers in the county, but, for reasons
unknown to your committee, they are not generally brought
forward at our exhibitions. It would certainly be desirable to
know something about these cows, as to their breed and yield
in milk and butter, that the community might avdil themselves
of such statements and procure calves from the cows for raising.
The chairman of this committee has a large and valuable cow,
which he was unwilling to risk over the railroad to Lawrence,
and he appends to this report a statement of her yield, in the
hope that his example may hereafter be imitated by others.

Moses Newell, of West Newbury, presented for exhibition
only, three cows, one eleven years old, of the Durham breed;
one Durham and Ayrshire, and one Ayrshire, also two calves.
These cows had the marks of being extremely good milkers,
but were not in so good condition, as to flesh, as the draft
made upon them required they should be. In the opinion of
the committee, the better the milker, the closer she should be ©
looked after as to the quantity of her feed; and they do not
subscribe to the general belief, that a good milker must neces-
sarily be thin in flesh.

JoHN ALLEY, 3d, for the Committee.

Statement of Samuel Southwick.

-I offer for examination a cow of the Galloway or no-horn
breed, eight years old. She calved in March, 1852, and has
continued to give milk ever since. I have kept an account
daily as I sold it to my neighbors. She has averaged nine
quarts a day for the whole period, amounting to four thousand

296 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

nine hundred and thirty-two quarts; the quality of the milk is
esteemed first rate for family use. We have not used it for
butter, selling to better advantage for four cents a quart in
summer, and five cents in winter. Ihave given about six quarts
of shorts daily, besides common pasture feed in summer, and
good hay in winter.

Lawrence, September 28, 1853.

Statement of James Poor.

I offer for premium, my cow “Fountain,” a native, nine years
old. She had her first calf at three years old, has had one
every year since, and has never dried for these six past years.
She calyed June 26th, 1852; again May 20th, 1853. She had
seven days’ sickness that month, in which I kept no account of
her milk. I began to weigh her milk the 1st of last October;
weighed up to the night of the 27th September, 1853. She
has given 8,304 pounds of milk in that period. She has made
310 pounds 14 ounces of butter, up to the 26th of this month,
from which, 338 quarts have been taken, which have not been
set.

Ibs. 02.

1852, October, butter, . F -)omrald
November, “ ' : oe ae
December, “ : : sie Dek oe
1853, January, a : . « 22. 12
February, “ , 2 ~ aie ee
March, 2 st as ye) ey
April, € ‘ . se A

May, 2 : 3 og ee uae
June, : . : ~ 4b,,3

July, a : ‘ sa. 8
August, x : ‘ o 33? 74
September, “ wie : , we

Her keeping, last winter, was clover and run hay, with three
quarts shorts per day. In summer, common pasturing, except
in July, when it was very dry, I fed her on hay night and
morning.

A sample of her butter may be seen in the hall.

Norrn Anpover, September 28, 1853.

MILCH COWS. 297

Statement of Moses Newell.

The subscriber enters for exhibition only, one starred cow,
eleven years old, a descendant of the bull Admiral, presented
by Admiral Coffin, to the State Society. She has not been dry
for four years, has had a calf each year in the summer, is now
nearly dry, and will calve in about six weeks.

The cow with the most white is six years old—dropped her
last calf in February last—is from a white Durham cow and an
Ayrshire bull, imported by Mr. Cushing, of Watertown. She
resembles the bull in form, color, and general appearance.

The two cows above described, have frequently given more
than twenty pounds of milk at a milking.

The one-horned cow, is Ayrshire, five years old, is now dry,
will calve probably in three or four weeks, is from the Cushing
importation; gives rich milk, and about fifteen pounds at a
milking, in good grass feed. I have presented them merely to
show the varieties of stock. My experience shows that there
are good milkers among all the varieties.

I also present, for exhibition only, two calves, one with white
spot, from a Durham cow, now lame, or she would be here;
came the 27th of June last—has had the milk of his mother
only. The other from the red cow, part Durham, dropped the
3d of July last—fed like the other. They are from a bull
dropped by the starred cow. I design to raise them for a pair
of oxen.

West Newszvey, September 27, 1853.

Statement of John Alley, 5d.

I have owned my cow “ Fanny,” two years last April. She is
across of the Ayrshire and Durham, and is seven years old.
She calved the 18th of June last. The first week, in addition
to what the calf took, she made of butter, A4lbs. 60z.

The calf was then sold. The week ending
July 2, sold 58 quarts of milk,and made 8 “ 2*

“ 8, “ 70 “ é“ res 4 “ j46&
“ 15, “ 81 res “ “ 5 « 126
“ 22, “ RR és rT; “ 3 « §6«

38*

298 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

July 29, sold 74 quarts of milk, and made 3 lbs. 8 oz.

Aug. 5, “ Far “ “ “ 4 &
“ i 2, “ 6 i “ “ “ Ax 66 4 sQiee
b 19, “i 88 b“ “ bb OMIM LOSS
“ 26, “ 86 “ i “ Di kee EE

Sept. 2, “ 88 “ “ b“ Pen MN ONT
““ 9, “ 90 “ “ “ pee Sr rr
bc 1 6, “ 92 “ “ “ 1, 66 eS
“ 23, “ 90 “ “ é“ Li hows
“ 29; bc iat “ “ “ 1 erie OFT

1,128 quarts. 51 lbs. 3 oz.

Lynn, October 29, 1853.

MIDDLESEX.

From the Report of the Committee.

We found in the “pens,” this year, an unusually large and a
most excellent collection of milch cows; we were rejoiced at
this sight, for we believe that of all the various animals,
whether quadruped or biped, that go to make up a complete
stock for the farm, the milk-giving portion are the most useful,
beautiful and indispensable.

In addition to the great number of cows offered for premium,
there were some very noble animals sent for exhibition, by
Gorham Brooks, Esq., of Medford, and by 8. G. Wheeler, Esq.,
of Concord, which added much to the interest of the fair, and
for which favor, these gentlemen deserve the thanks of the
society.

In conclusion, the committee would express their sense of
the wisdom of that arrangement, peculiar to the present, which
gives a separate day for the committees to make their exami-
nations. We hope it will be continued.

L. Eaton, Chairman.
Souru Rraprne, October 25, 1853,

MILCH COWS. 299

Statement of A. S. Lewis.

“May Queen,” a full blood Ayrshire cow, aged seven years,
raised at Marshfield, on the farm of the Hon. Daniel Webster,
calved twenty-fifth April last, average yield of milk, per week,
in September, one hundred and ninety-six pounds, giving one
pound of butter for sixteen pounds of milk, or twelve and a
quarter pounds of butter, per week.

“ Kugenia,” a full blood Durham cow, dropped in April, 1848,
raised in Worcester County, calved in April last. Average
yield of milk, one hundred and seventy-three and a half pounds
per week in September, giving one pound of butter for seven-
teen pounds of milk, or ten and a half pounds of butter per
week. In 1852, her yield for nine days in June, was fifteen
pounds twelve ounces of butter; for nine days in September,
twelve pounds butter.

“Victoria,” a half Ayrshire, and half Jersey cow, age four
years, raised on the farm of the Hon. Daniel Webster, at
Marshfield; average yield of milk per week in September, one
hundred and seventy-two pounds, giving one pound of butter
for fourteen pounds milk, or twelve pounds five ounces butter
per week.

“Rosa,” a three-quarters native and one-quarter Ayrshire
heifer, age three years, raised on the farm of the Hon. Daniel
Webster, at Marshfield, calved in June last. Average yield of
milk per day in September, was twenty-two pounds.

“Fanny,” Ayrshire heifer, age two years two months and
fifteen days, calved in August last; wishing to raise her calf,
have allowed it to drink all the milk. Raised in Roxbury,
Mass.

My stock of milch cows consists also of one full-blood im-
ported Jersey about calving; one native cow, which gives as
great a yield of milk as the others,—she is about calving.

“Daniel Webster,” a full-blood imported Jersey bull, age
four years,—offered for premium.

Feed. Common pasture, cornstalks at night, with two quarts
of shorts, or mixed bran for all the stock.

Framinauam, October, 1853,

300 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

a4

Statement of John Raynold.

“Lady ” was four years old on the 10th of June, 1853, and is
of Ayrshire and Durham blood. She has had three calves; her
last being dropped about the first of June, since which time, till
about the first of September, (three months,) she has on an
average filled a pail measuring nine and a half quarts, (beer
measure,) twice full, daily, of very rich milk, making about
nineteen quarts, including froth. The person who has milked
her is not a fast milker, and therefore, the amount of froth has
been less than it otherwise would have been. I should judge
that her average strained milk for the three months named, has
been not less than fifteen quarts per day. Her feed has been
a common pasture, with one quart of meal per day, and occa-
sionally a feed of green corn. She is perfectly gentle, and
always minds her own business, a trait of character which I
regard as of great value in a milch cow.

I refused $100 for her about two months since.

We have never made butter from her, but have sold about
eight quarts of her milk daily; have used cream mostly in our
family, and the hogs have had their full share.

Concorp, October 5, 1853.

Statement of Converse Smith.

The Ayrshire cow which I offer for premium, is seven years
old; she came in about the first of April, and gave about six-
teen quarts of milk per day until the feed got short, when she
did not give quite so much. She gave twelve quarts per day
the first of October, after she had been milked six months; no
grain or roots of any kind.

The native cow is ten years old; she came in in November,
and has been milked over ten months. The greatest quantity
that I milked from her was nineteen quarts in one day, or forty-
seven and a half pounds; she gave the first of October about
nine quarts per day. Hermilkisveryrich. I think she is the
best cow I ever owned.

Wautuam, October 5, 1853.

MILCH COWS. 301

Statement of George M. Barrett.

The six cows exhibited by me, as a dairy, are from three to
ten years old; they have been kept in my pastures, which have
been short, up to the present time, except two that have been
in better feed for two or three weeks past. Some of them
had one quart of rice meal a day, in the dry weather, and have
had corn fodder at night, the latter part of the season; they
gave, at their best, one hundred and three and a half quarts
per day, lawful measure, an average of seventeen and a quarter
quarts per day; and they gave, last week, seventy-seven and
a half quarts per day, an average of about thirteen quarts
per day, each.

The Ayrshire cow, “Jenny Deans,” exhibited by me for pre-
mium, is fourteen years old; she was imported by the Massa-
chusetts Agricultural Society, and kept by them at Mr. Phin-
ney’s, several years, and about four years since they made a
present of her to the Middlesex County Agricultural Society,
and I purchased her of the society about the first of January
last. She came in the 10th of May last, and has been kept
with ten or twelve other cows in my pastures, with rather
short feed; through the dry weather I gave her one quart of
rice meal per day, and the latter part of the season, corn fod-
der at night; she gave, the fore part of the season, eighteen
and a half quarts of milk per day, and gives now, ten quarts,
lawful measure. She is said to have given, when young, and
kept by Mr. Phinney, twenty-seven and a half quarts per day.

ConcorpD, October 4, 1853.

Statement of Hlijah M. Read.

The Alderney cow, “Europa,” offered for premium by me, is
eight years old; wasimported from the Island of Jersey, in 1851.
She calved in October, about two months after she came into
my possession. The average quantity of milk given by her, the
next nine months, was nine quarts per day; the greatest flow
of milk was twelve quarts per day. Her milk has not been
kept separate from that of my other cows, excepting for the
purpose of testing its properties for butter. The first trial

302 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

was in August, 1851, about two weeks after she arrived in this
Yankee land, and about two months before she calved. I found
by this trial that four quarts of her milk would yield a pound
of butter. The second trial was in February, 1852; we used
for the family, three pints of her milk per day, and the balance
in seven days yielded eight pounds of butter. One more trial
was had in the last of October of same year, and the result was
thirteen and a half pounds of butter in nine days. She had at
this time given milk over one year, her last calf then being
more than one year old. She dropped her next calf on the
17th day of May,1853. The whole quantity of milk given by
her since, I am unable to state.

The next trial of her milk for butter was made in May, about
two weeks after she calved; in seven days she gave one hun-
dred and ten quarts of milk, from which was produced seven-
teen and three-quarters pounds of butter. The last trial was
had within the last two weeks. She gave in nine days eighty-
five quarts of milk, yielding sixteen and a quarter pounds of
butter, equal to twelve and a half pounds of butter per week.

Her keeping through the winter, was two quarts of corn and
cobmeal, one quart of shorts, and good hay; in summer, good
pasturing, with the addition of some grain during the drouth in
July and August, and while we were testing the properties of
her milk for butter, she had two quarts per day. Her greatest
flow of milk was seventeen and a quarter quarts per day, which
was in June last.

Tewxspury, October 4, 1853.

Statement of John B. Moore.

Six days last June, this cow gave the following quantity of
milk :—

First day, twenty-nine and a half quarts; second day, twen-
ty-eight and a half quarts; third day, twenty-seven and a half
quarts; fourth day, twenty-seven and a half quarts; fifth day,
twenty-seven and a half quarts; sixth day, twenty-seven and a
half quarts, wine measure. Feed—grass, and two quarts rice
meal per day.

Concorp, October 5, 1853.

MILCH COWS. 303

Statement of Jonas Viles.

No. 1, has given twenty-one quarts per day, for a number of
days in succession; she has been milked eleven months since
she had a calf, and gives at the present time, nine quarts per
day, and comes in again the first of January. Breed, half
Ayrshire and native; she has had the second premium.

No. 2, has given eighteen quarts per day, has been milked
ten and a half months, comes in again in January; gives at the
present time, eight quarts per day; breed the same as No. 1.

No. 3, four years old, has given sixteen quarts per day, for
two weeks; has been milked six months since calving, and gives
at the present time, eleven quarts per day—calves again in
April; breed, native.

No. 4, four years old, has given fourteen quarts per day, for
a number of weeks in succession; breed, Ayrshire.

These other cows have given fifteen quarts per day; give a
good mess during the season.

Lexineron, October, 1853.

Statement of A. G. Heywood.

This certifies that this cow, which is four and a half years
old, gave twelve quarts per day, last winter, after her calf was
killed; she is three-fourths Devonshire breed.

ConcorpD, October 4, 1853.

Statement of Asa G. Sheldon.

One milch cow, seven years old. This cow may well be
called the long-lived native breed, her mother being twenty-
five years old when she brought this calf. She was raised in
the town of Union, in the State of Maine, and calved the 27th
day of last February. Her milk was mixed with other cows’
milk the first of the season, and she gave a good mess. We
then discovered her milk was of an excellent quality for butter.
The last week in August, her milk was set by itself and it pro-
duced eleven and one-quarter pounds of butter. The month
of September, her milk produced forty-three and a half pounds.

304 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

The last nine days in September, she produced twelve pounds
of butter, which is here on exhibition. Five quarts of the
above-named cow’s milk, produces a pound of butter.

Witmineton, October, 1853.

From the Report of the Committee on Heifers.

The committee on heifers found a large number of fine ani-
mals entered for premium. The competitors were so fairly
matched it was difficult to decide which was best, and they
wish, on that account, that a larger number of premiums could
be awarded.

There can be no doubt that an increased interest is awakened
among the farmers in this matter. The statements which were
handed in by the owners of the milch heifers confirmed this.
The animals themselves confirmed it. And the younger stock,
numerous and well formed, is an indisputable evidence of this
growing interest.

The milch heifers entered were nearly all natives. Many of
the younger animals, the one year and two years old, were of
the Ayrshire, Durham and Devon stock. The best heifer calf,
and a choice one to, in the judgment of the committee, was of
the Alderney breed.

Lronarp Huntress, Chairman.
Lowe, October, 1853.

Statement of Jonas Viles.

My heifer has given nine quarts per day for three months in
succession; has been milked six months; calves again April
next and gives six quarts per day at the present time. Breed,
Ayrshire and native.

Watrtuam, October, 1853.

Statement of George M. Barrett.

The heifer calf exhibited by me is three-fourths Ayrshire,
one-fourth native, five and a half months old; it was raised by
putting it to a cow that gave milk through the last winter, and
comes in again this fall; it sucked about three months, since
then it has remained in the pasture with food only.

Concorp, October 4, 1853.

nie ¥ ae 4 i i g
: . i bo 944 eh " ap
v/a MP ty - ee

Ni Cree
ri oaty 7, AL ee é
of J ae ar

DRAPES OPP TIED eg Wiles oe al

ee ; eee

er CUMETERMR CE cate uae aii " ia, oe

ce ot ek ie Tt Aes nn anche met =
te Roe a tate yi heer rey Vem
ii Net ne what, 4 FS bball weil ‘ Neibaetit rh

a fe

eVigye tm eat es blag i t2"9
pn eh da
Te) pari webieed " ye here Pearidi ig

:
ee nals or

Davie)

+d i «

“iis BONS,

Nose wy Wiig ey

Tro 8 rome We nil
as, rh hie ita iia ee
es oP pr =
Mes a, | _ A” rs J

ainenalE Sd oLy tof fgoi0e ssoy fo Ajtado
: J t : Ca A\ SP? Ff ‘

‘SSHINNOO MOO AGSACHL

HE PLALLIOAD MS

MILCH COWS. 305

Statement of Rufus Meriam.

The heifer which I have offered for premium is of the native
stock. She is fourteen months and five days old. She took
from a cow about two quarts of milk a day for the first six
months, and during the same time, I gave her a gill of meal
morning and evening; since then she has been kept on hay and
grass, with half a pint of meal per day.

Lexincton, October 3, 1853.

Statement of George M. Barrett.

The milch heifer exhibited by me is two years and ten
months old, half Ayrshire and half native. She came in last
April; has been kept with ten or twelve other cows in my pas-
tures, with rather short feed; the latter part of the season has
had corn fodder at night. She gave, the fore part of the sea-
son, twelve and a half quarts of milk per day, and gives now
seven and a half quarts, lawful measure.

Concorp, October 4, 1853.

Statement of Samuel Chandler.

The Devon heifer which I offer for premium was raised by
me, and is twenty-three and a half months old. She is a mix-.
ture of the celebrated Patterson stock of Devons, with that im-
ported by the Massachusetts Agricultural Society.

Her keeping has been of the ordinary kind both in summer
and winter. No grain or meal of any kind.

Lexineton, October 3, 1853.

Statement of William Spencer.

The Devon heifer I offer for premium is near ten months old,
and was raised as follows:—The first week after she was
calved was fed on new milk twice a day, about three quarts at
each time, after which she was fed on skim milk night and
morning, adding one quart of new milk to cach mess and a lit-
tle hot water, enough to bring the whole to the heat of new
milk; this was continued until she was eight weeks old; she

39*

306 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

was then fed on hay and a few carrots until about the first of
May; she has since run in a pasture having nothing but grass.

The heifer, four months old, is half Alderney and half native,
from a cow formerly owned by the late Hon. Daniel Webster,
and now owned by J. W. Paige, Esq., of Boston. She was
calved on the fifth day of June, and run eight weeks with a far-
row cow, since which time she has run in a pasture and had
nothing but grass.

LoweEtt, 1853.

To the Trustees of the Massachusetis Society for Promoting
Agriculture.

Gentlemen :—In a communication which I have just re-
ceived from the Hon. HE. R. Hoar, late president of the Mid-
dlesex Agricultural Society, he informs me that he had a con-
versation some weeks ago with one of the members of your
Board, in regard to the mode in which the State Society
could best promote agricultural improvement through the
agency of the county societies; and that he then suggested,
that if the trustees of the State Society had funds which they
could spare for the purpose, it might be well for them to divide
the State into districts, perhaps four in number; the western
counties one, Worcester and Norfolk one, the southern counties

‘one, and Essex and Middlesex the fourth; that should the sum
appropriated admit of it, $150 should be offered in each district
as premiums for the best dairy of cows, not less than six in
number, which should have been owned for five months previous
to the cattle show by the exhibitor, divided into three premiums
of $75, $50, and $25, open to competition to any person in
either of the counties composing the district, and offering it in
Middlesex this year, and in Essex next, or vice versa, and in
like manner in each of the other districts.

In case the funds of the society would admit of offering only
$100 to each district, in premiums of $50, $30, and $20, or in
two premiums of $60 and $40, it might be proportionably useful.

The foregoing plan presents a mode of offering premiums,
which, if not entirely new, has been adopted only to quite a
limited extent by any of our agricultural societies. The object

MILCH COWS. 307

is one of great importance; the advancement of that important
branch of agriculture which pertains to the dairy. Hitherto
the attention of agriculturists has been mainly directed to im-
proved modes of culture, with too little regard to the dairy, or
the stock best suited to its purposes. It is true, that to this
end the trustees of the Massachusetts Society have, for many
years past, directed their attention, and not without beneficial
results. That all their efforts should have been crowned with
entire success could not reasonably have been expected, That
they had aided in awakening the minds of farmers to a sense of
the importance of greater improvement in this branch of hus-
bandry, cannot be questioned. There is still much need of
further effort to advance this department, and bring it nearer
to perfection.

In the confident belief that the plan above mentioned, if
carried out under proper regulations, would have a useful and
beneficial effect, I bee leave to offer it for your consideration,
cherishing the hope that it will not be deemed unworthy of
your adoption and encouragement.

Very respectfully, your obedient servant,

Samu. CHANDLER.
LExINGTON, January 9, 1854.

Boston, February 18, 1854.
Gen. Samuel Chandler, Lexington :—

Dear Sir:—Your communication of January 9th, was duly
received by the trustees of the Massachusetts Society for Pro-
moting Agriculture, and has been considered by them with all
the attention which was due alike to its subject and its source.

At the last meeting of the Board, the undersigned were ap-
pointed a committee to communicate to you the conclusion to
which the trustees had come, with full powers to arrange all
the details which might be necessary for carrying their views
into effect.

You have done the trustees of the State Society no more
than justice in saying that “they have directed their attention
for many years past to the advancement of that important part
of agriculture which pertains to the dairy.” They deem no

308 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

department of husbandry more interesting or more important,
and they will gladly avail themselves of the suggestions of
experienced farmers, in doing whatever more may be in their
power in the same direction.

With this view, and in conformity with the general ideas of
yourself and Judge Hoar, they have authorized and instructed
the undersigned to select four counties in different quarters of
the Commonwealth, in which premiums for the best dairy of
cows shall be offered by the State Society during the present
year, and they have appropriated the sum of six hundred dol-
lars for the purpose. Should the result of this experiment
fulfil the expectations which they are encouraged to form, it is
not improbable that a similar course will be pursued in the
other counties in succeeding years.

For the present, however, we are authorized to announce to
you, and through you to the farmers of Middlesex, and other
parts of the State, that the agricultural societies of Middlesex, |
Berkshire, Worcester, and Bristol, are hereby severally em-
powered by the trustees of the State Society, to offer the fol-
lowing premiums for the present year, and to call upon our
treasurer for their payment, viz. :—

For the best dairy of cows, not less than six in number, and
which shall have been owned by the exhibitor and kept within
the county not less than five months previous to the cattle
show, $75. For the second best do., $50; for the third best
do., $25.

You will observe that we have so far departed from your
suggestions, as to confine the competition to the separate coun-
ties, instead of adopting the district system, which you pro-
posed.

And we desire, also, to add, that the whole responsibility of
judging as to the cattle exhibited, and of awarding the premi-
ums, is intended to be left to the county societies, respectively,
subject only to the conditions and limitations which have been
already stated.

We remain, dear sir, respectfully, your obedient servants,

Rosr. C. WINTHROP,

JAMES Brown, Committee.
Grorce W, Lyman,

MILCH COWS. 309

WORCESTER.

Report of the Commiitee.

The complaint annually repeated by committees on this class
of stock, may justly be reiterated, on this occasion. While
the premiums for excellence, offered by the society, are most
liberal, amounting to nearly one-half the value of a good
animal, and are so multiplied, in gradation, as to offer a reward
in the competition, for all but an inferior one, the number of
entries has always been very limited, and a compliance with
the rules, most usually, quite imperfect. When it is considered
how unsatisfactory must be the judgment of the properties
and value of a milking cow, from mere inspection of her ap-
pearance in a public show, the reasonableness of the require-
ment of the trustees, for an account of her product, during a
part, at least, of the season, must be apparent, and should
readily be acquiesced in by those who desire that the test of
an examination here, should be such as to evince just discrimi-
nation between the different races, and secure a preference for
such as possess the most desirable qualities.

There is no description of stock in which there are so great
variances as the cow. It is quite true, that there are certain
prominent points, which may generally be seen in a good
animal, but the eye has often been sadly deceived in the selec-
tion, and an animal of promising outward appearance, has
proved, not unfrequently, but a poor acquisition to a too confi-
dent purchaser. On the other hand, an animal, the least pre-
possessing in form, may possess the most valuable properties.
For instance, Mr. Parkinson, a distinguished herdsman of Eng-
land, in his account of the Alderney cow, says: “ Their size is
small, and they are as bad a form as can possibly be described ;
the bellies of many of them are four-fifths of their weight;
their neck is very thin and hollow; the shoulder stands up, and
is the highest part; they are hollow and narrow behind the
shoulders; the chine is nearly without flesh, the hocks are nar-
row and sharp at the ends, the rump is short,and they are
narrow and light in the brisket.” Yet, Youatt, another writer,
who in the main concurs with Parkinson in this description,

310 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

admits that although the Alderney “yields very little milk, that
milk is of an extraordinary excellent quality, and gives more
butter than can be obtained from the milk of any other cow.”
And Martin, another author of credit, declares that “in pro-
portion to the quantity of milk, the butter it yields is astonish-
ing. A single cow has been known to give nineteen pounds of
butter, weekly, for several successive weeks.” Now, whether
Mr. Parkinson’s representation of the external appearance of
the Alderney cow is exaggerated or not, (as doubtless it is,)
who would not prefer to take her with all these defects of
shape, in the assurance of “nineteen pounds of butter weekly,
for several successive weeks,” to most perfect symmetry of
form, with no more than ordinary milking qualities? Yet, in
the pens of a New England cattle show, it would require some-
thing more than the passing observation of a committee, how-
ever good judges of external points and appearance, for such
a competitor to bear away a premium. With neat stock, as
with a higher race of created beings, the homely and trite
adage, that “handsome is, that handsome does,” is especially
applicable. It is not merely the fairest exhibition in the pens
which can claim the preference, but united with this, there
should be the product and profit of the animal for all the pur-
poses for which it is raised and kept. Hence the importance
of a compliance with the details of the rule enjoined by the
trustees on the committee, in the examination of this depart-
ment of the exhibition; and in an adherence to that rule
should be seen a vindication of the judgment and discrimina-
tion with which the premiums are awarded.

That there exists in the County of Worcester the elements
for as fine a dairy stock as can be found elsewhere, cannot be
questioned. More than fifty years since, our race of native
cattle was greatly improved by the introduction of a cross with
the finest stock of England, imported by the Hon. Christo-
pher Gore, of Boston—a gentleman as justly distinguished for
his liberal contributions to the cause of agriculture, as for his
eminent accomplishments as a statesman and jurist ;—and this
cross, known afterwards as the “Gore Breed,” was productive
of many animals of rare excellence, raised among us. Subse-
quently, the importation by our own late honored and lamented

MILCH COWS. 311

fellow-citizen and associate, a vice-president of this society,
Stephen Williams, Esq., of Northboro’, gave us the blood of the
Durham race in “ Denton”—undoubtedly the noblest specimen
of the improved short-horns which New England has ever seen.
Simultaneously, or soon after, we had, as means of further im-
provement, the use of “ Cclebs” and “ Holderness,” by the
importations of Mr. Coolidge and Mr. Parsons, respectively ;—
the “Cream Pot” stock, carefully and judiciously bred by Col.
Jaques; and more recently, through the munificence of Mr.
Cushing, of Watertown, the Ayrshire blood in a fine bull pre-
sented by him to this Society; and still later, and now, both
Ayrshire and the beautiful Devons, by the bounty of the Trus-
tees of the Massachusetts Society for the Promotion of Agri-
culture. With such instrumentalities, and with skill and care
in breeding, our exhibitions should be rich in animals most
valuable in their adaptation to all the purposes of husbandry.
With the Devons upon our native stock, for the yoke; the ©
improved Durhams, in the blood of “Denton,” for the stall, and
the Ayrshires for the dairy, there can be no obstacle to the
production of the finest stock of any desirable variety; and
perhaps even, through judicious crossing, the characteristic
qualities of all the races may, to a considerable extent, be found
united.

That the Ayrshire cow, upon the whole, is the best contribu-
tor to the milking-pail, seems now to be generally conceded by
English breeders; and it may not be too much to assume, that
the result of their introduction into this country abundantly
justifies that preference. The improved short-horns, as contra-
distinguished from the Ayrshire, for a long time contested the
palm; and of this race, indeed, the most remarkable instances
of milking and butter producing qualities are well authenticat-
ed. Ina late number of the Journal of the Royal Agricultural
Society of England it is stated, that Mr. Ferguson, an English
breeder, in an account given by him of a high bred cow, which
he purchased in 1819, has thus written :—“ As to milk and but-
ter, the quantity of each was so extraordinary, that I should
say it was quite incredible, had I not myself been an eye-wit-
ness of it. It was tested in two ways, wherein there could be
no doubt. For many weeks she gaye thirteen quarts at one

312 | MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

a

meal, each quart producing two ounces of butter; the quantity
being so large, I had the milk kept by itself, and at seven days’
end, we churned twenty-six pounds of butter.” And, he adds:
“this cow, during the time, got nothing but grass from an ordi-
nary pasture.” Of another short-horn cow, he reports “an
extraordinary yield of milk and butter from an animal of capital
feeding qualities, and of good points.and breeding. This cow
gave, ona pasture of middling quality, twenty-eight quarts of
milk per day from the time of calving in spring till mid-summer,
and averaged twenty quarts of milk per day for twenty weeks.
In thirty-two weeks she produced three hundred and seyventy-
three pounds of butter, averaging eleven and two-thirds pounds
per week; the greatest weekly quantity given, during that
time, was seventeen pounds, and the least seven pounds.”

The chairman of this committee was himself once the owner
of a cow, often exhibited and admired in our pens, of the half
blood of “ Denton,” of large size and great beauty, which gave
from twenty-five to thirty quarts of strained milk per day, for
several successive weeks, and of such amazing richness, that the
late Col. Pickering, finding occasion, in the course of his famous
controversy with Col. Powell, of Philadelphia, as to the relative
value of the native and imported breeds of neat cattle, to in-
quire into the matter, on being shown a pitcher of the cream,
fresh from the skimming, flatly declared, that it had been
already churned! Such, however, are rare instances, and may
be regarded as furnishing little assurance of general produc-
tion. It is not the intention of the committee, nor is this the
fitting opportunity, to discuss the merits of particular breeds.
We wish only to suggest, that what has been done elsewhere,
may be done again, and here,—and that with judgment in the
selection of stock, and care in the rearing, as fine animals, of
any race, may be found on our farms, and seen at our shows, ag
ever graced the cattle fairs of England. The properties and
products of every race have frequently been given to the public
by numerous breeders of great intelligence, both in this coun-
try and in Europe; and he among us who, by a careful exami-
nation and presentment of the evidence, in a brief compendium
of instances and facts, should now furnish the ready means of
comparison and preference to the practical farmer, would

“ HDL y (iin

pean Of hen ee
Mi wes Ber ee it OTE tie ail
Nie aN! i aan ‘i y MER ie
oh RA NY a) trot de
WAR Me teal es leit, an
he aay pay ex
ag oyest)) ee ray Y, 1%

Beatie ie As hdd aaa
VI BY Sgt y i: a Ds ti i ree ait i
. ere

o {| ;
gs bitis 7 zy me ‘3 queen od Va a. 6 it > i?

why se ovehat nyeAr

s

MEA. c-inayrncrdl, enh PO

Lae
a a

ea Ar at hi 7 Al

i @ it ‘ Fy batty:
f iy Ae iy if i ay nS Tn ‘
. ‘
pO UD Ve le dante r
“a a ‘pS _ ® e a
Ds 70 Lado ae bc Gri? ash i, si r= ii i
Ye a igs Me ti |
Pat ar ue shi
‘ ry ov ad if !
; : Dh i ae
j hy, "i : A
’ » t ,
ay yan 1] i y
} ¢ 7
'
.

BLUZNAME? JO dbf to, AgaI200 ‘seny ja Agtadod
s BS « 4 s WN Sf / ‘of

“VNNIN UYAIHH AXSACaL

GPT OA VAY PUIY DH “¢

MILCH COWS. 313

render a service to the interest of husbandry which could not
be overestimated.

In the exhibition of this day, the committee have not found
the number of animals, nor the degree of excellence, which
might have been expected. The entry, indeed, is respectable,
but from the largest agricultural district of the Commonwealth,
it should have been far greater. By the secretary’s books it
appeared, that but five cows were offered for premium, and
nine were presented for exhibition only. The committee care-
fully and repeatedly examined all, and so far as their inspection
and the testimonials submitted to them would allow, they have
endeavored to assign to each their rank, in value, as milking
animals.

Among the animals offered for exhibition, the committee
noticed, with particular satisfaction, two cows, each four years
old, of the true Alderney race, imported by the Hon. Stephen
Salisbury, always a most active and liberal member of this
society, and one of the board of trustees. These cows had
been purchased by him on his recent visit to Europe, and were
selected without regard to cost, on a full assurance of their
purity of blood. They arrived here only on Saturday last, in.
a bruised and disfigured state, from a long and boisterous pas-
sage of more than sixty days. They certainly are in the worst
possible condition to produce a favorable impression, by their
appearance. Yet, as “touch of their quality,” it was shown
to the chairman of the committee, that one of these now cer-
tainly not very prepossessing looking creatures, fresh from a
voyage across the Atlantic, with scarce strength enough to rise
upon her legs, and not having even recovered her appetite for
food, yielded two quarts of milk at a milking, which, by the test:
of the Lactometer, standing twenty hours at a guage of nine
inches, gave two and a half inches of cream; while of the milk
of eight of the best dairy cows of the owner, at the same guage,
and for the same length of time, with which it was compared,
the highest shows but one inch and one-eighth, and the lowest
but one-half an inch! On another anniversary, we may hope to
see how far care and good condition will enable us to appreciate
these valuable cattle. The thanks of the society are eminently
due to their public spirited proprietor for the introduction of

40*

314 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

this race into the county, and for permitting their presence
under so many disadvantages, to give interest to our show.

Leyi Lincotn, Chairman.

Statement of Samuel Ellsworth.

1. What number of cows constitute your dairy? A. Ten.

2. What their age respectively? A. Two, nine years old;
one, seven years old; three, four years old; three, six years old;
and one, two years old.

3. What their breed? A. Five half Durham, one half Ayr-
shire, one half Holderness, and three of native breed.

Where bred and raised, and by whom? A. Six bred and
raised by myself, one bred by Elias Ayres, in Barre, one by
HK. W. Paige, of Hardwick, and two I do not know where.

5. On what day did they drop their last calf, and what was
the quality of the calf? A. My dairy commenced dropping
their calves in February; nine of them dropped them by the
15th of April, and one the 11th of June. I raised nine calves,
and the remainder were sold for veal.

6. They were turned to pasture the 12th of May.

7. The cows which I offer for premium had in June two
quarts of provender per day, and four quarts of potatoes; when
on trial in September, each cow had two quarts of shorts and
one of provender, per day.

8. The five cows, three of which I raised, made in the first
ten days of June, two hundred and thirty-six and a half pounds
of cheese, and in the first ten days of September, one hundred
and ninety-five and a half pounds. The 11th of June they made
nine pounds of butter, and the 11th of September six pounds.

9. Besides the butter and cheese used in my family, I sold
$295.46 worth. The ten cows made 3,268 pounds of butter
and cheese.

10. [have kept four old hogs and eight pigs; they have had
no grain until the first of August, since then fed six barrels
of barley and six of corn. The hogs and pigs are valued at
‘$151.

11. The nine calves which I raised are valued at $135.

/ Cow No. 1, “ Georgiana,” six years old; calyed March 9th;

MILCH COWS. 315

will calve again the 11th of February; went dry seven weeks,
raised calf, and yielded, in the first ten days of June, 456
pounds of milk; first ten days of September, 366} pounds of
milk.

No. 2. “Red Rover,” nine years old; calved in March; will
calve again the 25th of February; went dry eight weeks, raised
the calf, and yielded, in the first ten days of June, 4443 pounds
of milk; first ten days of September, 3693 pounds of milk.

No. 3. “ Ayrshire,” six years old; calved in April; will calve
again March 5th; went dry ten weeks, raised the calf, and
yielded, in the first ten days of June, 4533 pounds of milk; first
ten days of September, 335} pounds of milk,

No. 4. “Young Spot,” six years old; calved in March; will
calve again March 7th; went dry seven weeks, raised the calf,
and yielded, in the first ten days of June, 4073 pounds of milk;
first ten days of September, 818 pounds of mill.

No. 5. “Young Daisy,” four years old; calved in April;
will calve again the first day of March; went dry eight weeks,
raised the calf, and yielded, in the first ten days of June, 370
pounds of milk; first ten days of September, 2801 pounds of
milk.

Statement of H. P. Reed.

My dairy consists of five cows; those exhibited were seven
and ten years old; the three others, three, six and nine years;
the red cow, (exhibited,) Devon and Holderness breed; the
starred cow, (exhibited,) Ayrshire, Holderness and native ; the
others Ayrshire and Holderness; the red cow calved May 22d,
the starred cow calved May 9th, calves both heifers, good ones
and being raised. The other cows calved 21st and 28th of March,
and April 1st, calves all being raised. Red cow dried March 21st,
and the starred cow March 1st, and they will calve in April;
turned to pasture May Ist, and fed once a day since August
20th on corn fodder; 175 quarts of milk sold besides the milk
and cream used in the family of six persons; 385 pounds of
butter made from the time of turning to pasture till September
13th; keep four swine. The calves were fed upon new milk
eight weeks, and upon skimmed milk three weeks longer.

316 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

Red cow made, during first ten days in June, 211 pounds
butter; and during the first ten days in September, 15 pounds
and 15 ounces, and yielded, during the first ten days of June,
4533 pounds of milk; first ten days of September, 275} pounds
milk.

Starred cow made, during the first ten days of June, 17
pounds of butter, and during the first ten days of September,
122 pounds, and yielded, during the first ten days of June, 3803,
pounds of milk; first ten days of September, 233 pounds of
milk.

PRINCETON.

Statement of J. W. & Wm. W. Watson.

Our dairy consists of five cows—two of them are four years
old, one six and one two years old; one of them is of the Dur-
ham breed, two, half Ayrshire, one, half native, and one, half
Devon; we raised three of them, John Brooks raised one, and
B. Harrington one; two of them calved in February, the other
three in March, calves all raised and of good quality; four of
the cows will calve in March and one in May; they were dried
in the fore part of winter; turned to pasture the last week in
May. ‘Two and a quarter pounds butter each day in June, and
one and three-fourths pounds during each day in September.
During the first ten days in June, 100 pounds of four meal
cheese were made, and in the first ten days in September, 80¢
pounds. From the time of turning the cows to pasture till
the 20th of September, we made 537 pounds butter and 1,133
pounds cheese; twelve to fourteen in family; keep two old
hogs and nine pigs, fed with little meal and few potatoes.

Cow No. 1. Yielded, from the Ist to the 10th of June, 33%
pounds per day; from the Ist to the 10th of September, 26%
pounds.

No. 2. Yielded, from the 1st to the 10th of June, 373
pounds per day; from the 1st to the 10th of September, 26
pounds per day. |

No. 3. Yielded, from the 1st to the 10th of June, 363
pounds per day; from the 1st to the 10th of September, 27}
pounds per day.

One of the above is a two-year-old heifer.

MILCH COWS. 317

From the Report of the Committee on Heifers over two years
old.

The committee appointed to award premiums on heifers of
two years and upwards, have the pleasure to submit the follow-
ing report :—

The number of competitors was eighteen, who have offered
for examination thirty animals; fourteen three years old, and
sixteen two years old. Four two years old heifers were offered
by John Brooks, of Princeton, and two by Stephen Salisbury, of
Worcester, for exhibition only. The committee take great »
pleasure in saying that many of them were very superior ani-
umals, making the duty extremely difficult to decide who were
entitled to the premiums.

Amory Houtman, Chairman.

From the Report of the Committee on Heifers less than two
years old,

Your committee, having attended to the duty assigned to
them, respectfully ask leave to report :—

Being fully aware of the respect paid to this kind of animals
by all classes of society, they have not lightly regarded the
responsibility which their trust imposes upon them. Hence
they have endeavored to enter upon their duty with unbiassed
minds, regardless of circumstances in which competitors may
have been placed, provided they had complied with the requi-
sitions of the society, and have designed to be impartial in all
their decisions.

Immediately after the creation of man, God gave him a right
to use the animals that were below him in the scale of organiza-
tion, to enhance his comfort, his pleasure, and his gratification ;
and also for his sustenance, and the purpose of labor. Man
thus became lord of the animal creation. He accordingly uses
one animal to warm him, another for purposes of pleasure, and
another to feed and nourish the body. But among the different
species and varieties of animals, not the least honored and
respected, or the least useful and beneficial, is the heifer, which

318 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

is so soon to take the place of its mother that stands at the
head of all our domestic animals in point of usefulness. When
we contemplate her beautiful traits of character—her docility,
symmetry of form, placid countenance, forbearance under ill
treatment, which sometimes she receives by those who would
be called men, and even gentlemen—and the benefit she is
destined in future to confer on mankind, we cannot but admire
her, and exclaim, that she is in many respects worthy of admi-
ration and imitation.

Your committee, on examination, found thirty-two yearling
heifers entered as competitors for premiums, and one for exhi-
bition; as also twenty-one calves to compete for the premiums,
and five for exhibition; and after due deliberation, decided to
award the first premium to Harrison Bacon, of Barre, for the
best yearling heifer, seven-eighths Durham; to Charles Bowen,
of Worcester, the second premium for the second best heifer,
three-fourths Durham; and to Marshall J. Maynard, of North-
boro’, the third premium for his heifer, one-half Durham.
They have also awarded to Harrison Bacon, of Barre, the first
premium for the best heifer calf, seven-eighths Durham; the
second to Nathaniel Dodge, of Sutton, for a calf half Devon.

Your committee found but one lot of five heifer calves, which,
by the rules of the society, were entitled to a premium; those
were presented by Samuel Ellsworth, of Barre, and to him we
award the first premium. Four of them were three-fourths
Durham, and one, half Durham.

They are happy in saying that they found many specimens
that were an honor to the occasion and to their owners, and
had it been in the power of your committce to have granted
them all a gratuity, it would have cheerfully been done; but
they wére deprived of the satisfaction, for want of means and
power so to do.

They would gladly go into detail and specify the excellent
qualities which all seemed to possess, in a greater or less
degree, would circumstances permit; but the prolixity of the
subject forbids such a course.

We cannot forbear, however, alluding to some few that seem
to stand out prominently. And in the first place, we were
peculiarly struck with five heifer calves, from two to six months,

MILCH Cows. 319

one-half Ayrshire, presented by John Brooks, of Princeton.
They were fine specimens, entered for exhibition.

Harvey Dodge, of Sutton, presented a beautiful calf, one-half
Devon; the mother, only three ycars old, being present with
her second calf, she having been recently sold for $80, (as your
committee were informed by the owner)—a suflicient comment
upon the calf.

There were also two calves presented by William S. Lincoln,
of Worcester, which attracted the attention of your committee,
and they would recommend them to the public as fine specimens
of stock; as one also presented by Henry Boyles, of Princeton,
one-half Ayrshire, one-half Devon.

Harrison Bacon, of Barre, presented five splendid heifer
calves, and had they come within the rules of the society, which
required them to be taken from the cow at eight weeks, would
unquestionably have taken the first premium.

There were three very fine yearling heifers offered by Rejoice
Newton, of Worcester, three-fourths Durham; and also one of
the same breed by Benjamin Willard, of Lancaster, which we
would speak of in terms of approbation.

J. Warren BiceLow, Chairman.

WORCESTER WEST.

From the Report of the Committee.

The cow is second in interest and importance to no other
one of our domestic animals; she affords to us all many of the
luxuries and comforts of life, and to the farmer much of the
profits of the farm. For milking purposes she differs in value ;
some failing to pay their keeping, while others give large
returns for the cost of food consumed. How to rid ourselves
of the worthless, and supply their place with superior animals,
is a question of great interest to us all, and should be the con-
stant study and care of the dairyman. We should not, for small
and mistaken present gains, select, as many of us do, our best
calves from our superior cows for the butcher, reserving inferior
ones to supply our future dairies, perpetuating, by the process,
a race of cattle, certain, in three or four generations, to be-

320 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

come nearly or quite worthless. We should rear the best
calves from our best stock, regarding the fact that a calf worth
eight dollars at six weeks old, on becoming a cow, at three
years old, will be worth thirty dollars; while a calf at the same
age worth six dollars, will not, on becoming a cow, at three
years old, sell for more than twenty-five dollars. Thus, by
raising our best stock, we secure five dollars at three years old,
for an outlay of two dollars at three weeks old; besides con-
tinuing a race of animals that will be constantly improving.

It is a well-established maxim in the breeding of cattle or
growing of plants, that like produces like. Cows for the dairy
should be selected from a long line of good milking stock, and
be fed, from early youth, with abundance of food of such quality
as will promote health, and the enlargement of the lactescent
vessels, and the consequent secretion of milk, and keep the ani-
mals at all times in good condition. High blood will avail but
little in the veins of an ill-fed, half-starved cow. In keeping
cattle, warmth and comfort is of more importance than many
farmers, from their practice, would seem to admit. The tem-
perature of the atmosphere affects the quantity of food the
animal requires; the greater the difference of tempera-
ture between the body and the atmosphere in which the
animal lives, the more food they require to keep up the
natural warmth of the body, and less of the food will be
converted into milk or muscle. Hence the importance of
warm stables in winter, and sheltered pastures in summer, and
sheds for milch cows to rest under in rainy and cold, dewy
nights. In selecting cows for the dairy, regard should be had
to the quantity and quality of food designed for them. If the
food is good and abundant, large cattle may be selected; if
poor and less abundant, small cattle will prove most produc-
tive. In general, in either case, small cattle give the largest
return in proportion to the cost. The larger the bone and
muscle the ereater will be the daily want, and greater will be
the quantity of food required to maintain it. Small cows will
therefore yield a greater return of bone, muscle, or milk, in
proportion to the food consumed, than large ones. Cattle
require, for daily consumption, about two per cent. of their
live weight of good hay, or its equivalent, to keep them in

MILCH COWS. 321

present condition, or to supply the daily want of their bodies.
All over this may be converted into bone, muscle or milk. If,
therefore, we have a given quantity of food, say thirty pounds of
good hay, or its equivalent, to convert into milk, and feed it to
a cow weighing ten hundred pounds, she will, after using two
per cent. of her weight, or twenty pounds of the hay, to support
her daily natural want, have ten pounds to convert into milk,
bone or muscle. But if we feed the thirty pounds of hay to a
cow weighing fifteen hundred pounds, she requiring two per
cent. of her weight, or thirty pounds of hay to supply her daily
want, or to keep her in present condition, she will have none
remaining to convert into either milk, bone, or muscle, and
instead of yielding a profit, will be nearly worthless for the
dairy, and valuable only as a machine to convert her food into
manure. Hence the fact so generally observed, that small cows
give the richest milk. They waste less of their food in sustain-
ing their own bodies. Good dairy cows convert less of their
food into flesh and more into milk, which gives that lean and
long appearance so generally observed in our best milking
stock. ‘The external marks characteristic of a good dairy cow
have been so often and so well described, the committee will
not name any of their own. They, however, beg leave to
recommend to their brother farmers the study of M. Guenon’s
work on milch cows, believing that if they will make themselves
familiar with the marks therein described they will never be
disappointed in the purchase or rearing of a cow for the dairy.

The cows exhibited and coming under the inspection of the
committee, were five in number, all of which were creditable to
the show, as well as to their owners. For the best lot of dairy
cows of not less than nine in number, owned and kept together
from June first to September tenth, one of which shall be ex-
hibited, the committee award the society’s premium to William
Robinson, Jr., of Barre. Mr. Robinson’s whole dairy consists
of twenty cows, of half Durham breed, all kept together and
alike. The twenty gave, on the second day of June, 702 pounds
of milk, averaging 35.1 pounds each. This milk made seventy-
eight pounds of cheese, or one pound of cheese to nine pounds
of milk.

The nine cows offered by Mr. Robinson for premium, gave,

41*

322 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

the first ten days in June, 3,549 pounds of milk, which made
39414 pounds of cheese. The first ten days in September, they
gave 2,527 pounds of milk, which made 280 pounds of cheese, or
33.755 pounds each, daily, which made 6741 pounds of cheese—
one pound of cheese to a fraction more than nine pounds of
milk.

For the best lot of cows of not less than six in number, one
of which shall be exhibited, the committee award the society’s
premium to William Robinson, Jr., of Barre. The six cows
gave, the first ten days in June, 1,991 pounds of milk, which
made 215} pounds of cheese. The first ten days in September
they yielded, in milk, 1,508 pounds, which made 170 pounds of
cheese. In both periods their yield of milk was 3,499 pounds,
or 29.16 pounds each,- daily; which made 385} pounds of
cheese—one pound of cheese to a fraction more than nine
pouncs of milk.

Mr. Robinson deserves great credit for the management of
his dairy, and his example is worthy of imitation by others.
His cows gave large returns, yielding, on the second day of
June, 35.1 pounds of milk each, and each making 3.9 pounds of
cheese, which, at nine cents per pound, is thirty-five cents per
day. Add to this thirty-two pounds of whey—about the quan-
tity the milk would yield after extracting the curd—worth four
cents for feeding hogs, and we have thirty-nine cents, the daily
return of each cow.

For the best cow, kept alone or with others, the committee
award the society’s premium to Daniel H. Rice, of Barre, for
his native red cow, eleven years old. The live weight of this
cow, the committee estimated to be eleven hundred pounds.
She gave, the first ten days in June, 371 pounds or 37.1
pounds of milk daily, from which was made nineteen pounds of
butter. The first ten days of September she gave 311 pounds,
or 31.1 pounds of milk, daily, which made sixteen pounds of
butter. During both periods, she yielded 682 pounds of milk,
which made thirty-five pounds of butter. Her average daily
flow of milk was 34.1 pounds. Her daily make of butter was
1.75 pounds. She gave, daily, 3.1 per cent. of her live weight
in milk, and 5.13 per cent. of her milk was butter. This cow
is remarkable for holding out, she falling off in her milk, from

MILCH COWS. 323

the first ten days in June, to the first ten days in September,
only sixty pounds in ten days, or six pounds a day. <

For the next best cow, kept alone or with others, the com-
mittee award to James W. Jenkins, of Barre, the society’s pre-
mium, for his large red cow, three-fourths Durham, nine years
old, and weighing 1,444 pounds. This cow produced, the first
ten days in June, 4223 pounds of milk, which made 15.85
pounds of butter. The first ten days in September, she gave
385 pounds of milk, and made 9.33 pounds of butter. During
both periods she yielded 8071 pounds of milk, and 25.18
pounds butter was made from this milk. Her average daily
flow of milk was 40.37 pounds, which was equal to 2.79 per
cent. of her live weight, daily, and her milk was 3.12 per cent.
butter. Such cows as this would probably prove more profit-
able to the butcher or grazier, than the dairyman.

The other cow, entered for premium by Mr. Perry Johnson,
of Barre, was a large red cow, thirteen years old, of native
breed. She suckled her calf since June 14th, and she does
credit to the well-earned reputation of Mr. Johnson for good
stock, but as Mr. Johnson failed to comply with the rules of
the society, the committee could not award him a premium.

There was also a cow entered by Warner Smith, of Barre.
She was a noble, large cow, with twin calves by her side, and
would do credit to any farmer. Mr. Smith being one of the
committee, deemed it fit to withdraw his cow from competition.

In conclusion, the committee congratulate their brother farm-
ers of Worcester West, on the success of their show to-day.
The pens have been well filled with cattle and swine, and the
coops with fowls, which must be gratifying to all who are, like
the committee, lovers of good beef, pork, and poultry.

Joun Brooks, Chairman.

Statement of William Robinson, Jr.

My dairy amounts to twenty cows, all kept alike and together.
They are one-half Durham, were dried in February, and calved
in March and April. Nearly all calved again in March and
April. Nineteen of the calves were sold to raise, for $186,
and were taken when from three to ten days old. The second

324 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

day of June they gave seven hundred and two pounds of milk,
from which was made seventy-eight pounds of cheese. During
the first ten days of September, was made three hundred and
seventy-seven pounds of cheese. The nine cows entered for
premium were,—one, 7—four, 6—three, 5—and one 4 years old,
yielding, during the first ten days of June, 3,549 pounds of
milk, which made 3941 pounds of cheese. The first ten days
of September, they yielded 2,527 pounds of milk, which made
280 pounds of cheese. The six cows entered for premium,
five of which are 5 years old, and one, 4 years old, yielded,
during the first ten days of June, 1,991 pounds of milk, which
made 2154 pounds of cheese. The first ten days in Septem-
ber, they yielded 1,508 pounds of milk, which made 170 pounds
of cheese.

Barre, September 24, 1853.

WORCESTER NORTH.

Report of the Committee.

The committee on milch cows were all at their posts at the
appointed hour this morning, and having attended to the duties
assigned them, respectfully submit the following report :—

The number of cows entered for premium was but four.
Joseph P. Reed, of Princeton, is the owner of one of these
cows, which is ten years old, of the Devon and Holderness
breed. She gave, the first week in June, three hundred and
sixteen and three-quarter pounds of milk, from which was made
fifteen pounds of butter. The first week in September she
gave one hundred and ninety-one and a half pounds of milk,
which yielded eleven and three-sixteenths pounds of butter.
Another cow is owned by Nathan B. Reed, of Princeton, which
is seven years old, of the Ayrshire, Holderness and native
breed. She gave, the first week in June, two hundred and sixty-
six pounds of milk, from which was made twelve pounds of
butter; and the first week in September she gave one hundred
and sixty-three pounds of milk, from which was made eight and
fourteen-sixteenths pounds of butter. These two cows have
had no other keeping than by pasture during the season, up to

MILCH COWS. 325

the 20th of August, and since that time, corn fodder once a
day.

Another cow was entered by Enoch Caldwell, of Fitchburg,
who has owned her about four years, and supposes her to be
eight or nine years old. She gave, the first week in June, 237
pounds of milk, from which was made ten and a half pounds of
butter; and the first week in September, she gave 220 pounds
of milk. She has had no extra keeping, having been fed through
the winter on hay and corn fodder only, and through the sum-
mer has fed in a quite dry pasture; but since the first of Au-
gust, has had green stalks twice each day. :

The remaining one of these animals is owned by John P.
Sabin, of Fitchburg. She is of the Durham breed, eight years
old, calved Tth of March, the calf weighing at one day old, 108
pounds. She gave the first week in June, 2663 pounds of milk,
and the first week in September, 202 pounds of milk, being
4681 pounds for the two weeks—being nearly thirteen and a
“half quarts per day. Amount of butter for the week in June,
ten and a half pounds, and for the week in September, eight
and three-quarters pounds.

The pasture in June was decently good; in September rather
short. One quart of meal or two quarts of shorts, night and
morning, has been her usual feed through the year.

These are all fine animals and good milkers. The committee
having fully considered all the particulars respecting them,—
the time at which they severally calved, the quantity and quality
of their milk, and especially the expense of keeping of each,—
have unanimously awarded the premiums at their disposal, as
follows :—

To Joseph P. Reed, of Princeton, the first premium; to
Nathan B. Reed, of Princeton the second premium; and the
third premium, for want of a fourth, they award to Enoch Cald-
well and John P. Sabin, jointly, to be divided between them.

K. Torrey, Chairman.

326 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

a

Report of the Committee on two and three year old Heifers.

Perhaps no department in the labors of the agriculturist is
more important, profitable, or worthy his attention, than that of
the dairy. In order that he may realize fully its benefit, he
must call to his aid not only science, but the observation
and experience of himself and others, that thereby the means
may be well and successfully adapted to the end. The farmer
is, emphatically, his own recruiting officer; and as the members
of his dairy company are constantly passing out of the ranks,
some at a good old age, after having served their generation
well, and yielded their commander many pounds of the needful,
others have been turned out, being found destitute of those
qualifications requisite in a good company of milkers. For all
recruits, to sustain and enlarge his dairy, the farmer must turn
his attention to*the particular branch of the exhibition, held
to-day, which has occupied the attention of your humble com-
mittee.

At the risk of trespassing upon the limits of the committee
upon new milch cows, (though we will not not go into details,)
permit us to say that the same traits of character and physical
development are necessary in the younger members of the dairy,
which are prominent in the real model milkers of maturer
years. If these are wanting, it is unwise to retain such for the
family. They should be at once discharged, and given their
rations, until they are considered, by good judges, fit subjects
for the butcher’s knife; or turned over to the breeding de-
partment. For who would think of retaining at a branch of
business a person that had no adaptedness or taste for that
particular pursuit, especially if profit was the ruling motive in
view ? :

Your committee regret to say, (though they were thereby
relieved from otherwise so arduous a task,) that there was but
one entry for premium of three-year-old heifers, and though
there was no competition, yet your committee were at a loss’
whether to award the first or second premium, until they ex-
amined the written statement, giving the yield of this heifer
during the first week of June and of September, viz. :— |

She calved March 28; calf an extra one; has been kept with

MILCH COWS. 327

four other cows; no keeping but by pasture, till the 20th of
August, and then fed on corn fodder once a day, upon which -
she gave, during the first week in June, 202 pounds of milk,
and made eight and ten-sixteenths pounds of butter; the first
week in September she gave 156 pounds of milk, from which
was made seven pounds fourteen ounces of butter.

Upon this statement, rather than the superior external marks
for a milker, yourcommittee have awarded the first premium to
Mr. Joseph T. Reed, of Princeton, for the best three-year-old
heifer, having had a calf. Breed, one-eighth Ayrshire, one-
fourth Holderness, and native.

There was, also, but one entry of two-year-old heifers, having
had a calf. Had the committee been furnished with her yield
of milk or butter, they might have arrived at a different result ;
but under the circumstances, they have awarded to Mr. Joseph
Upton, Jr., the third premium for his two-year-old heifer,
haying had a calf.

GrEorRGE KENDALL, Chairman.

HAMPDEN.

From the Report of the Committee.

The number of cows on exhibition was unusually large.
Twenty-eight were entered, several of which were presented for
exhibition only. Of those entered for premiums, but a portion
had complied with the published requirements of the society, and
but few of those who returned the circular furnished them, had
fully accomplished the design of the society, by their response.
These were examined in connection with the animals to which
they related, as minutely as the limited time would allow, and
we offer them as a part of our report.

Alden Hitchcock, of Springfield, states that his cow is seven
years old, of Ayrshire and native breed; that she calved Sep-
tember 20th, 1852. The calf was fattened for veal, and sold
for $10.22. Three hundred and twenty-one pounds of butter
were made from her milk, valued at $68.74; and eight hundred
and thirty-“\ur quarts of milk sold for $20.46. Making a
total income of $99.42, exclusive of the milk used in his

328 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

family. The average of milk during ten days in June, from
the 10th to the 20th, was thirty-seven pounds, daily. During
the required trial in September, she was dry. Has a calf at
this present time. Her feed, common pasture, in summer. In
the winter months, hay, with a partial feed of roots.

Zebard Foster, of Springfield, states that his cow is seven
years old. Calved May 29th, 1853. Her average of milk
from June 10th to the 20th, was sixty pounds, daily. The cor-
responding days in September, thirty-five pounds. Her feed,
pasture, with four quarts of rye provender, daily.

J. H. Demond reports his cow to be of native stock; seven
years old, and calved the middle of August last; she was dry
in June; and her daily yield during the ten days’ trial in Sep-
tember was forty pounds per day. Milk all marketed at four
cents per quart.

Amos M. Carlton, of Chicopee, states that his cow is five
years old, Durham and Ayrshire; calved August 17, 1853.
The daily product of milk, from June 10th to the 20th, was an
average of fourteen and one-half pounds. In September, during
the same leneth of time, was thirty-four and one-half pounds.
Mr. Carlton says, that for one year, ending March 1, 1853, her
product was three thousand seven hundred quarts of milk—
being an average of ten quarts per day.

In the second class, cows from two to five years, there were
several which, although unaccompanied with the statements re-
quired by the society, we venture (in front of our duty) to
depart so far from the prescribed regulations, as to recommend
in this case that the premiums provided for this class of animals
should be distributed among those possessing prominent points
of excellence. We would notice one entered by O. H. Cooley,
of Springfield. She was three years old; and your committee
unanimously consider her a most perfect miniature cow. There
were two herds of nine cows each, which were a ereat addition
to the interest of the exhibition.

Mr. Marshal Pease, of Chicopee, is the fortunate owner of
one of them, and although he offered no statement of their
products as a claim for our consideration, your committee have
no hesitation in pronouncing them a superior herd of cows.

Mr. Samuel Murphy, of Springfield, presented the other for

MILCH COWS. 329

our examination ; these were all in fine condition, and exhibited,
severally, most prominent points of excellence. It is proper
that we should here remark that none of the statements furnish-
ed have given any account of the butter produced by their cows,
except Mr. Hitchcock. It is a well known fact that a great
difference exists in the quality of milk from different cows in
the produce of butter. Your committee are satisfied that the
amount of butter should be required, as well as of milk, by all
competing for the premiums.
PHINEAS STEDMAN, Chairman..

Report of the Commuiitee on Heifers and Heifer Calves:

The committee on this class of animals report that they were:
called by their duty to examine one of the most interesting
features of the exhibition, thirty-five young, handsome, and
thrifty animals, whose promising appearance for future useful-
ness, as mothers, and milkers, is very seldom exceeded; indeed,
the sight of so many, and all so good, is rare to be enjoyed.
Most of them were related to those families most distinguished _
for their milking qualities. The Durham, Ayrshire, Devons,
Herefords and native, were all represented, beside those which
were only half and half of either class. The positive demon-
stration of an increasing interest in this department could not
be overlooked, and it is a subject which still demands constant
and devoted attention from every one rearing animals for the
dairy or for stock breeders; in no other way can we arrive to
that point of excellence so desirable in our dairy stock, par-
ticularly. The increasing demand for the best cows, and the
still increasing value placed upon such, is a sufficient warrantee
for still greater exertions in this matter. The committee can-
not forbear the expression of their appreciation of the merits
of severalothers. Itis but justice to them to particularize those
offered by A. M. Carlton, Lyman Brown, and Abel Pease; these
formed a trio of superior young animals, and we hope to see
them again, an ornament to our future exhibitions.

J. H. Demonp, Chairman.
42*

330 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

t

FRANKLIN.

Report of the Commuttee on Cows.

The number of cows entered for exhibition and premiums
was larger than usual, (about thirty,) but not as large as is
desirable. Every good cow in the county should be exhibited,
to give encouragement to the farmers’ holiday, as well as to
show the promise for good cows and oxen in the future. 'The
ot, as a whole, was very fine—not a poor or inferior one
among them. Ten were exhibited by Mr. Timothy Stoughton,
of Gill, all fine, and attracted much attention, not only from the
committee, but from others; he was well worthy the premium
awarded. Messrs. William Long, 8S. C. Taylor, and Samuel
Fisk, all of Shelburne, have each a lot of three excellent looking
cows, and were so from the statements given in, though not
entirely complete and full. Those of William Long had each
her calf by her side, giving a good promise for the future. Dr.
D. D. Fisk, of Greenfield, gave a full statement of his cow, from
which it appears that in the first week in June she gave over
sixteen quarts of milk per day, which weighed forty-one pounds
per day, and from which sixteen pounds five ounces of butter
were made. This is truly a very remarkable yield of milk and
butter, especially with no other feed than a common pasture.
She is a native, with a cross of Durham, and your committee
believe that to be the best stock of the county. The cows of
Mr. Josiah Foge, David R. Wait, and Asahel Wright, all of
Deerfield, were very superior animals, and had they given a full
statement we cannot say where they would have stood in the
list of premiums. That of Mr. Fogg is probably one of the
very best cows in the county. If premiums are expected, the
rules of the society must be complied with.

H. G. Newcoms, Chairman.

Report of the Committee on Heifers.

The committee on heifers would respectfully report that at
no previous exhibition of this society has there been a more
full or better exhibition of this class of animals than the present ;

MILCH COWS. 331

there were none of inferior quality, and nearly all of them of
superior merit, of comparatively large size, and of great variet
of form and color. There were twenty entries for premium,
and three for exhibition only; and while your committee were
going through with the examination we could not but regret
that we were restricted to so small a number of premiums as
has been offered by the society, for we believe that no part of
our exhibition should be more encouraged than raising stock,
and especially, stock for the dairy. Many of the animals were
so nearly of equal merit that we found it extremely difficult to
decide to whom the premiums should be awarded.

A very fine heifer was entered by William Long, Jr., of
Shelburne, two years old last April, three-fourths Durham,
weighed eleven hundred and forty pounds. Four two-year-
old heifers were presented by Thomas J. Field, of Northfield,
one pure blood Ayrshire, and three half bloods; they were of
medium size, good form, but gave signs of excelling chiefly in
the dairy, for which the Ayrshire are so justly celebrated.
There were also several heifers presented by Charles Pomroy,
of Northfield, Col. Hawks, of Deerfield, Judge Grennell, of
Greenfield, Samuel Fisk, of Shelburne, and others, whose names
we did not ascertain.

J. S. Puree, Chairman.

NORFOLK,

From the Report of the Committee.

The number of milch cows entered for premium was fifteen.
The unfavorable state of the weather prevented sending from
a distance much valuable stock, which would otherwise have
increased very much the interest felt in this, one of the most
important departments of our exhibition.

The following are the copies of statements in relation to the
yield of milk and butter, to which premiums are awarded :—

Statement of S. J. Capen.

The cow offered for premium is one-half Ayrshire and one-
half Durham; eight years old. She calved May 2d, 1853; the
calf was killed when three days old. From June 1st to June

332 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

10th, she averaged 23 quarts of milk per day, weighing 53
pounds. From September 1st to the 10th, she averaged 17
quarts per day, weighing 41 pounds. She was fed on grass
and corn fodder.

Dorcurestrr, September 27, 1853.

Statement of Francis Guild.

Native cow, seven years old. From the 10th to the 20th of
June she gave 327} pounds of milk, which made 19 pounds of
butter. From the 10th to the 20th of September she gave 250
pounds of milk, which made 16 pounds of butter. She calved
March 23d; her feed grass—not good feed—and fed some with
green corn in August and September; one quart of meal and
one quart of shorts each day.

Depuam, September 27, 1853.

Statement of J. J. Dixwell.

I send my Jersey cow for exhibition. As I keep her for
family use I have very little record of her yield. Her excel-
lence is in the quality, not the quantity, for she is not a large
milker. During the last week in May, and the first week in
June, her milk was set aside for butter with this result :—First
week, 763 quarts of milk, from which was made 12 pounds of
butter; second week, 723 quarts of milk, from which was made
133 pounds. In addition to pasturage, she was fed with two
quarts of shorts, one of Indian meal, and one of oil meal, each
day. She calved the 5th of March. Now she gives but
five or six quarts per day. On several trials her milk has
produced a pound of butter from a fraction under five and one-
half quarts of milk.

West Roxsury, September 27, 1853.

\

Statement of J. W. Clark.

Native cow, six years old. Calved May 7, 1853. For the
first three weeks she averaged eighteen quarts of milk per day.
The first week in June we used sixty-nine quarts of milk, three
quarts of cream, and made from the remainder eight pounds of

MILCH COWS. 333

butter; the second week, used fifty-six quarts of milk, six quarts
of cream and made six and a half pounds of butter. We measur-
ed the milk but once this month, (September,) she gave fifteen
quarts per day. Feed three to five quarts of shorts per “ay,
and what grass she wanted.

The committee, before closing their report, will venture
some suggestions upon the general management of milch cows.

The principal and most important points are these: The se-
lection of stock; their general care and treatment; a judicious
and well regulated method of feeding.

In relation to the first of these, but little need be said by the
committee, the selection being a matter depending mainly upon
the taste and judgment of those interested; and of which there
is almost as great a difference as there are owners. But when
itis considered that the cost of keeping a good cow is but very
little, if any, more than that of a poor or ordinary one, it will
be conceded that this is a matter of great importance to the
farmer. But with ever so good a selection, the result, so far
as profit is concerned, wiil be any thing but desirable, unless
a faithful and methodical plan, in regard to care and keeping,
is most strictly adhered to. For it is believed that a stock of
cows, however good, may, by only a common or ordinary mode
of feeding and treatment, be reduced in their product so as to
make but poor returns for what is expended upon them; while,
on the other hand, a common or ordinary stock only, with judi-
cious care and feeding, may be made to increase largely in
their yield and pay a remunerating profit to the farmer.

It is difficult to attach too much importance to the second
point proposed, viz.: that of care and treatment. It is be-
lieved to be no uncommon thing among our farmers, in the busy
season of the year, in particular, to postpone the “ milking
time,” till almost night, so that the men having this duty in
charge, may be enabled to do their day’s work in the field, and
then, as a matter of course, milk the cows. Now all hands
must take part in this, so as to despatch, as readily as possible,
this closing job of the day. And who doubts that this, done
after a hard day’s work in the heat of the summer, with exhaust-
ed body, coupled with the certainty of a late supper; with the

334 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

hurried manner of driving the cows from pasture, the im-
patience of the men, and consequent harsh treatment of the
cattle, the udder but two-thirds emptied of its contents, and in
fact, the whole work, in some way or other, imperfectly done;
who doubts that it is a mistake in management that must prove
decidedly prejudicial in its results? A stock of cows, on the
other hand, should be tended by the same help, daily—and,
when it can be done by one man, never allow more to take part
in it—and tended in such a way that a feeling of perfect con-
fidence and affection will be cultivated by them for their keeper,
which tender and gentle treatment will be sure to beget.

As to the manner of feeding, and particularly in the winter,
it is believed that much harm results either from over or under
feeding, and feeding at irregular andimproper times. A stock
of cows should be fed but three times in the twenty-four hours,
and at just the same hour each feed.. And, instead of crowd-
ing before them as much as they can comfortably dispose of,
or more, feed a little sparingly, so that the crib will be entirely
emptied within the hour; and if by chance a little is left, be
sure and have it removed, and the crib swept entirely clean.

Care should always be taken to furnish an ample supply of
pure water, say, at least, three times each day, the last water-
ing to be as late as eight o’clock in the evening, at which time
they will partake more freely than at any other. It is also
advised, that provision be made for watering in the barn, in-
stead of at any time in the winter, being obliged to have them
exposed to the storms and cold without. Itis believed, that by
furnishing a supply of water thus toa stock of cows in milk, the
quantity, by this alone, will be increased from fifteen to twenty
per cent. above what it would be by the usual mode of treat-
ment.

One other important point to notice, is the necessity of keep-
ing cattle in a warm, but well-ventilated ,barn. Your commit-
tee are satisfied, by their own observation and experience, that
from December to April there is great gain, both in yield of
milk and flesh, by keeping a stock of milch cows tied up in the
barn at least five days in seven, and that one hour of out-door
exercise, in each of the two days, is all that should be allowed
them. So that it may be safely stated, allowing all other

WORKING OXEN. 335

things to be equal, that a careful observance of these two lat:
ter points alone, viz.: a good supply of water in the barn, and
warm and nearly equal temperature, will add, at least, one-
quarter to. the product. Dry bedding, day and night, with
careful carding, should not be omitted.

It is believed that the average yield of milk throughout the
State will not exceed four quarts per day, for each cow, through
the year. Now, if this opinion is correct, it is, to say the least,
discreditable and inexcusable; for it is unquestionably true,
that the very same stock may be made to yield six quarts, and
that, too, without any additional consumption or cost of feed,
but simply by judicious and careful treatment.

Your committee, in conclusion, would recommend that a pre-
mium of $25 be offered for the greatest yield of milk per day,
through the year, from ten cows, of not less than eight quarts;
of $15, from six cows; and $10, from not less than four cows.
Statements to be made by the applicants, of breed, mode and
cost of keeping.

Jno. H. Ropinson, Chairman.

WORKING OXEN.

HAMPDEN.

From the Report of the Committee.

Your committee were highly gratified with the appearance
of the cattle presented for their examination. The arrange-
ment of the cattle under their several grades by age, adds
largely to the facility of their examination, and furnishes the
most ‘favorable opportunity to judge them comparatively, and
the trial by draft exhibits their power, their motion, and their
discipline, as well as the judement and discretion of their driver.
Much, very much, depends upon the manner in which working
cattle are managed by the driver. It is not our duty to make
report upon this point, but the subject is worthy of considera-
tion, and your committee were pleased with the readiness of

336 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

those exhibited, to obey the word of the driver without the
blow from his lash; and this we consider the true discipline;
“a merciful man is merciful to his beast,” is a maxim that
should be indelibly stamped upon every yoke.

For the committee,

AARON ASHLEY.

FRANKLIN.
From the Report of the Committee.

The committee appointed to view and report upon the com-
parative merits of the working oxen submitted to their exami-
nation, regret that the number of entries was not larger. But
twelve pairs were presented to them, and although these were
worthy of high commendation, yet a larger number seems
almost indispensable in order to sustain that general interest
and generous rivalry in this department, which it is the aim of
this society to foster. The farmer prides himself upon his fat
cattle but your committee are unable to perceive why the
working ox, his daily companion in toil, should not be, at least,
an equal sharer in his care and solicitude.

Your committee incline to the opinion that if a deeper inter-
est were felt in this department, a show of working oxen might
be presented in Franklin County, which, like our shows of fat
cattle and noble horses, would be second to no other in the
Commonwealth.

Of the oxen examined by the committee, they have to speak
in the highest terms of praise. They were all excellent, and it
is to be regretted that the number of fixed premiums is not
large enough to bestow upon more of the exhibitors, commit-
tees being exceedingly liable to error where the distinction in
excellence is small.

Davip WELLS, Chairman.

WORKING OXEN. 337

NORFOLK.

From the Report of the Committee.

The trial was performed by drawing a cart, loaded with two
tons of stone, from the bottom of a long hill to the top, and
back. Hach team trying their skill and strength in backing
the same load up hill, two or more times, while descending at
difficult points. The same cart and load were used by each
team. Your committee would add, that the work was quite
satisfactorily performed by each of the competitors, Mr Tucker’s
oxen doing it with the most ease to both themselves and their
driver. In the opinion of your committee, with some of the
drivers there was quite too free use made of the whip and voice ;,
the lash leaving marks, too true a proof of the strength of the
arm that wielded it. Your committee would speak with plea~
sure of three yokes of oxen exhibited by A. D. Weld, as being
worthy of note; their docility and training, as exhibited, were
well worth the attention of farmers. They were entered for
premium; but, as none were offered except on each yoke
separately, your committee had not the power to award any to
them, though for beauty of shape, training, and matching in
color, it is doubted whether they could be excelled in the
county. ;

We regret that a cold easterly storm prevented the appear-
ance of so large a number of competitors as usual; and also,
that, probably for the same reason, there were no town teams.
present. With the remark, that probably no animal on the
farm repays more fully kind care and treatment from its owner
and driver than the ox, we respectfully submit this our report
to the society.

Royat W. Turner, Chairman.

BRISTOL.

From the Report of the Committee.

The committee on working cattle submit the following re-
port :—
Nineteen pairs of oxen and seven pair of steers were entered
43*

338 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

for competition, being two pairs of oxen and three pairs of
steers more than last year. Of these, five pairs of oxen and
two pairs of steers were withdrawn during the trial. The load
for the oxen weighed 17,436 pounds, and that for the steers
5,050 pounds, including the weight of the wagons; being con-
siderably heavier than those of last year; they were, however,
by no means too heavy; and the ease with which every pair of
cattle drew and backed the loads was evidence that all of them
were good.

None of the oxen Were so large and firm as some of those
exhibited last year. Still there were many fine teams that. won
the admiration of all that saw them.

The steers were, this year, the best part of the exhibition.
They were relatively better than the oxen; and in awarding
premiums for them, we do it with the satisfaction that none
have been better deserved. Indeed, if there were more induce-
ments offered for steers, we are by no means certain that our
working stock might not thereby be benefited more than it is
by the premiums offered for older cattle.

We regret to find that while some of the best breeds of
Europe are represented in the dairies of our country, very little
attention has been paid to raising oxen from them.

Nearly all the cattle offered were brought from up country.
Only a few were raised in the county. Still, the fine points of
the best stock are as desirable in the ox as in the cow. The
deep chest, the short neck, the small head, the straight back,
the well made legs and fine hair, are evidence of strength and
endurance; and belong to breeds of which the females prove
good milkers.

Our native breeds, when well used, produce excellent oxen;
there is a hardiness about them, and a submission to labor that
is admirable. But a pair of oxen of good blood, of perfect
shape, well kept, but not too fat, is a beautiful sight; and at
the same time, when well trained and properly driven, is
capable of the greatest amount of labor, and shows the greatest
strength.

Oxen are the most constant, though silent companions of the
farmer, and his most faithful and patient servants. They are
his first care in the morning; with them he starts-a-field at

FEEDING STOCK. 339

early dawn; they smoke before as he turns the furrow for his
seed; they draw the manure that makes his crops; they draw
his wagons that gather his hay and ripened grain; and they go
with him to the woods to seek his winter’s fuel.

Sometimes they are ill used; and occasionally are most
harshly and unjustly punished. Still, their patient, uncomplain-
ing good nature never leaves them, and they are ready again to
labor, and suffer if they must, for their master. And when the
spring and vigor of their life is over, and before old age comes
on, their master fattens and kills them, and makes of them his
daintiest feast; though the kindness of a true farmer’s heart
usually leaves to other hands, and a distant market, this last,
unkindest cut of all.

With such close daily associations, it is not wonderful that
the farmer loves his oxen, and prides himself on their excellence.

He owes to his own thrift to obtain the best kind, to his
good taste that they be fine looking, and to his better nature
to use them well.

C. B. Farnsworta, Chairman.

COMPARATIVE VALUE OF CROPS AS FOOD FOR
CATTLE.

ESSEX.

The committee on the comparative value of crops as food for
cattle have received no statement respecting this subject for
the past two years. Being chairman of that committee, I have
often been requested by several members of the society, to give
the result of my experience. I feel extremely reluctant in so
doing, not because I am not fully satisfied by that result, but
because it differs so much from that of able and distinguished
agriculturists in other parts of the State. Nevertheless, if
this communication should stimulate others to make further ex-
periments, so that we can arrive at the true value of the differ-
ent kinds of food for cattle, although they may differ much from

340 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

my own, I shall feel fully compensated for contributing the fol-
» lowing :—

In the spring of 1850 I sowed forty-two square rods of land
to carrots, on which corn was raised for fodder the year pre-
vious, ploughing in two cords of well-rotted stable manure.
There were sixteen young apple trees growing on the land,
which had been set three years; the soil a black, strong loam—
the yield was one hundred and fifty-six bushels.

January Ist, 1851, I purchased twelve new milch cows and
commenced sellingmy milk. After the first two weeks, my son
observed that he did not have milk enough for his customers
by about three gallons per day, and that I had better buy more
cows; but, believing, as I did at that time, I could easily in-
crease the milk of my present number one quart each per day,
by feeding with carrots, I accordingly ordered the man who
tended the stock to commence the next morning, (January
15th,) to give two and a half bushels of carrots to the twelve
cows, morning and night, for the next seven days. I then
inquired of my son how much the cows had increased, and to
my surprise his answer was, not quite two gallons for the week-
I then resolved to attend to the feeding myself, and fed the
next seven days with hay only. The result was no diminution.
I then fed with carrots as before, the next seven days, and
there was less than one gallonincrease. I continued the same
feed alternately for the next four weeks ending March 12th;
during which time the cows fell off some in their milk, but not
more than one gallon when fed on hay only, than when carrots
were added. The hay used during the trial was first quality
English hay, with a small foddering of salt hay in the morning.
I continued feeding the same kind of hay night and morning;
giving at noon as much rowen hay as they would eat in thirty
to forty minutes, which increased the milk more than one quart
to each cow daily for the next four weeks. By this time I was
fully satisfied it would not pay to raise carrots for milch cows,
and that I would try some other method.

In April, 1851, I prepared and sowed the same piece of land
with onions, where carrots grew the year previous, using the
same quantity of manure. The yield was one hundred and
sixty-eight bushels, which I sold for forty-seven cents per

FEEDING STOCK. 341

bushel, amounting to seventy-eight dollars and ninety-six cents.
In November following I bought four tons of shorts in Boston,
at nineteen dollars per ton; freight to Bradford one dollar and
forty-five cents per ton, making eighty-one dollars and eighty
cents, or two dollars and eighty-six cents more than the onions
brought. I then had four tons, or about four hundred bushels’
of shorts, costing but two dollars and eighty-six cents more
than the one hundred and fifty-six bushels of carrots. I think
the labor was no more to raise the onions than the carrots,
and the labor less to feed the cows with shorts than with car-
rots.

December 1st, 1851, I commenced giving my cows from four
to eight quarts of shorts each per day, and continued through
the winter, except eight days in February I left off feeding four
cows with shorts that had been having eight quarts per day,
and measured the milk the first four days. I found they
decreased, on an average, three pints each per day. The next
four days I fed them with about an equal quantity of rowen
and coarse hay, which increased the milk full up to the quantity
when fed with shorts.

The next experiment I commenced December 25th, 1852, by
selecting three of my best cows, as nearly equal in size, condi-
tion and goodness, as I could. No. 1, eight years old, dropped
her calf November 25th; No. 2, nine years old, dropped her
calf November 25th; No. 3, eight years old, dropped her calf
December, 2d.

I continued the experiment eight weeks, giving to each cow
the same money’s worth of the different kinds of feed, by
weight, as the same cost at the time, viz.: shorts, twenty-six
dollars per ton; oil meal, thirty dollars per ton; Indian meal,
eighty cents per bushel of fifty pounds; rye meal, one dollar
per bushel of fifty pounds; giving to each cow fifty-two and a
half cents’ worth per week, seven and one-half cents’ worth per
day.

The first week forty-two pounds of shorts were weighed for
each cow, and fed night and morning, being about four and one-
half quarts each time, wet with six quarts of water two hours
before feeding. No. 1 gave, in the seven days, 82} quarts, beer
measure; No. 2, 784; No. 3,79. Total, 239} quarts.

342 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

_ Second week, thirty-five pounds of oil meal were weighed for
each cow, wet and fed same as the shorts, being about four
quarts per day. No. 1 gave, in seven days, 87} quarts; No.
2, 813; No. 3, 824. Total, 2514 quarts.

Third week, idesiwe pounds thirteen ounces of Indian
meal were weighed for each cow, wet and fed the same, being
about three quarts per day. No. 1 gave, in seven days, 85
quarts; No. 2, 844; No. 3, 84. Total, 2531 quarts.

Fourth week, pigentic -six and one-quarter pounds of rye meal
were weighed for each cow, being about two and one-half
quarts per day, wet and fed same as above. No. 1 gave, in
seven days, 813 quarts; No. 2, 83}; No. 3, 783. Total, 2433
quarts.

Fifth week, forty-two pounds of shorts weighed and fed
as before. No. 1 gave, in seven days, 764 quarts; No. 2, 783;
No. 3, 74. Total, 2283 quarts.

Sixth week, thirty-five pounds of oil meal, weighed and fed
as before. No. 1 gave, in seven days, 82 quarts; No. 2, 841;
No. 3, 814. Total, 2473 quarts.

Bonenth week, thirty- cn pounds thirteen ounces of eee
meal weighed and fed as before. No. 1 gave, in seven days,
863 quarts; No. 2, 891; No. 3, 84. Total, 2604 quarts.

Eighth week, twenty-six and one-quarter pounds of rye meal
weighed and fed as before.

No. 1 gave, in seven days, 871 quarts; No. 2, 83 quarts; No.
3, 782 quarts. Total, 2404 quarts.

Three hundred and fifty pounds of English and seventy
pounds of salt hay were weighed and fed to the cows each
week. When the cows were fed on shorts and rye meal, the
whole quantity was consumed. When fed on oil and Indian
meal an average of fifty-eight pounds of English hay per week
was not consumed.

Cost of feeding three cows two weeks on shorts, $3.15; T00
pounds English hay, seventy-five cents per hundred, $5.25; 140
pounds salt hay, fifty cents per hundred, 70c. Total, $9.10.
Quantity of milk for the two weeks, 468} quarts.

Cost of feeding three cows two weeks on oil meal, $3.15;
584 pounds English hay, seventy-five cents per hundred, $4.38 ;

FEEDING STOCK. 343

140 pounds salt hay, fifty cents per hundred, 70c. Total, $8.23.
Quantity of milk for the two weeks, 499 quarts.

Cost of feeding three cows two weeks on Indian meal, $3.15 ;
584 pounds English hay, seventy-five cents per hundred, $4.38;
140 pounds salt hay, fifty cents per hundred, 70c. Total, $8.23.
Quantity of milk for the two weeks, 513} quarts.

Cost of feeding three cows two weeks on rye meal, $3.15 ; 700
pounds English hay, seventy-five cents per hundred, $5.25; 140
pounds salt hay, fifty cents per hundred, 70c. Total, $9.10.
Quantity of milk for the two weeks, 484 quarts. '

It will be seen from the above experiment, that Indian meal
possesses the highest value for producing milk; differing, how-
ever, but little from oil meal.

Many farmers object to the free use of grain of any kind,
believing such food to be too stimulating. But my experience
is otherwise. I have twelve cows which for the last five years
have dropped their calves in the fall of the year, and have been
fed during the winter and spring, till they went to pasture, with
as much meal or shorts as were used in the above trials, and
were uniformly in as good health and better condition than a
like number that dropped their calves in the spring, and had no
grain of any kind during the year.

It should have been stated above, that my cows are kept in
a tight barn, sufficiently ventilated during the days and nights,
except when they are turned out to water about nine o’clock,
A. M., and four o’clock, P. M., when they remain out about
twenty minutes each time.

Wituiam F. Porter, Chairman.

The following interesting remarks, on feeding stock, by the
Hon. Peter Lawson, of Dracut, as chairman of the committee
on bulls, (Middlesex,) will be found of great practical value :—

The committee have, in former reports, given their opinion
in regard to the proper system of breeding. They would now
take the liberty to make a few remarks on the system of feed-
ing and treatment, for if the latter is not properly attended to,
the former will fail to “satisfy expectation.” Obvious as this
doctrine must be to every intelligent mind, yet, judging from

344. MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

the reports of many agricultural societies, as well as from the
opinions, and especially the practice of numerous individuals,
it seems that they expect that it is enough if they import, or
procure in any other way, animals famed for any particular
quality, and that they (the animals) should exhibit that quality
in its greatest possible perfection, under any system of feeding
and treatment, which may suit the convenience or purse of their
owner, although it may be the very opposite of that which is
best calculated to produce the desired effect. Notwithstand-
ing, if that effect is not produced, then state that the animals
have not “satisfied expectation.” No reasonable man expects
unnatural results. Famers should adopt a system of feeding
and treatment suited to the nature of the animals which they
have. If such were always the case, we would hear much less
about the disappointment of well founded expectations.

In Ayrshire, (Scotland,) where great attention is paid to the
breeding of dairy stock, and also to the management of the
dairy, their method of feeding is as follows: during the winter
months, the cows are fed with cooked food, (boiled or steamed, )
twice a day, morning and evening—and this is the case, whether
they are giving milk or dry. It is composed of chaff or cut
hay or straw, and roots of some kind, potatoes, turnips, or car-
rots. The roots are broken very fine and thoroughly mixed
with the chaff or hay, and frequently bean meal (Indian meal
is equally good) is added during the mixing process; water
is put in when necessary, and the whole is seasoned with salt.
Their fodder, when dry, is generally oat straw, but when giving
milk, it is English hay. They are kept comfortably warm and
well littered with straw, and combed or carded daily. In sum-
mer, they are turned out to pasture, in fields well cultivated
on the rotation system. And the cows that run largely to
milk, and would become lean in consequence, get a portion of
bean meal, oil, or rape cake, to keep them in good condition
and improve the quality of their milk.

It will be seen, from the above statement, that the farmers
of Ayrshire, in order to realize their “expectations,” depend
much on the feeding and treatment they give the cows, as well
as on their peculiar organization which tends to convert their
food into milk.

FEEDING STOCK. 345

But it may be said that any breed of cows would produce
the same results, under similar circumstances. Any cow or
breed of cows, possessing the same kind of organization and
size as the Ayrshires, would be likely to do so. But no cow
nor breed of cows, however perfectly organized for the dairy,
will answer that purpose well, if turned out to pasture in sum-
mer, on an “old, dry, worn-out pasture, with a short bite,” and
get a “bite” of nothing else all day, and in winter tied up ina
cold barn (and fed on coarse meadow hay, with perhaps as
many roots, “as will do,” as the saying is, “to swear by,’)
where the thermometer will range from thirty degrees above,
to as many below zero, where every pore in the skin is shrivelled
up, and the circulation of the blood partially, or almost wholly
stopped, so that neither it, nor the organs of the body, can
perform their natural functions.

This last described system, is a very prevalent one through-
out the State, and may be found in full operation even in many
parts of Middlesex County, but it will never be highly produc-
tive of either milk, beef, or manure; and they will be all of a
poor quality, the latter, scarcely worth hauling out. But un-
philosophical and barbarous as this system is, it seems to be
the one most sought after, for judging from the statements
made in agricultural reports, about the productiveness of cows,
it seems to be the farmer’s boast that he can show with how
little food and shelter he can enable his cow or cows to keep
life (if not soul) and body together, and yet produce milk.
Animals that will produce large quantities of milk under such a
system of feeding and treatment, would certainly be more pro-
duetive under the Ayrshire system, (and throwing humanity
aside, as a matter of but little consequence, where the “al-
mighty dollar” is the principal object,) and in all probability
more profitable and’ less likely to “disappoint the expecta-
tions” of their owners.

It is of great consequence to the farmer, that he has the
breed of animals most suitable for his purpose, for without
that, the best system of feeding will fail to accomplish that
purpose in the best possible manner. A cow whose form and
organization is well adapted for converting her food into milk,
will be more profitable than one whose organization tends to

44*
,

346 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

convert her food into manure. The latter may give a greater
quantity of milk than the former, and yet, be the most unprofit-
able of the two, because she will not yield as much in propor-
tion to the value of the food which she consumes. Much has
been said and written about the productiveness of cows of
different breeds, and of cows of no particular breed, but very
little has been said about the cost of the production. If the
two statements were placed side by side, a better estimate
could be formed of the intrinsic value of the animals. No one
breed of cows is adapted in the best possible manner, for the
dairy and the shambles; the two qualities cannot be combined
in the same animal, their difference in form prevents it.

It will be observed, from what has been stated in the system
pursued by the Ayrshire farmer, that he adapts means to ends,
and therefore is most likely to have his “expectations satis-
fied.” He gives his cows a liberal supply of dairy food, and

in such a state (a large portion of it being cooked) as enables
the animal to extract from it more nutriment; and by pursuing
this plan, together with punctual attention, the quantity of
milk will, in many instances, be doubled or trebled. Punctu-
ality in feeding, is of great importance, as it prevents all
uneasiness in the animal on that account; for without a watch,
or the knowledge of its use, they know their feeding time as
well as their keeper, and as all uneasiness produces a waste of
milk and flesh, they should be as punctually attended to and
as calmly treated as possible.

The system of the Ayrshire farmer is founded upon sound
philosophical principles, and not upon hap-hazard ones. The
more we facilitate the adaptation of the food for the organs of
digestion, the greater will be the saving to us. He therefore
euts up his hay, straw, and roots, to save some expenditure of
force, hence of food, by the feeding animal. If food contains
much water at a temperature far lower than that of the animal,
it must be raised to that temperature at an expense of part of
the food. This is obviated by the process of steaming, and in
many cases will prove a saving of one-twentieth part of the
food. All feeders of pigs know that they thrive better on dry
than on wet fodder. He also provides comfortable accommo-
dations for his cattle, where their blood will circulate freely,

‘

a)

FEEDING STOCK. 347

and where every pore of the skin and organ of the body will
perform their natural functions.

It is a well established fact, that warmth is equivalent to
food. The heat of the animal system is kept up in the same
manner as flame is supported—that is, by a union of carbon
and oxygen. The animal derives its carbon from the food;
which, having undergone digestion, is taken up by the blood,
and thence conveyed to the lungs, where, by the act of respira-
tion, it is united with a portion of the oxygen of the atmos-
phere, and heat is produced. Exposure to a low temperature
dissipates the animal heat, just as heat is driven off from any
other body similarly situated. It is obvious that the natural
temperature of the body must be sustained, or the animal will
perish. As carbon is the only material by which this heat can
be furnished, that substance must either be supplied to the
blood from the fat and muscle already formed, or the blood
must obtain it through the medium of food. If the food is de-
ficient, the supply must be made up from a waste of the bodily
parts; and the consequence will be, loss of flesh and weight,
which, if long continued, may cause the death of the animal,
either by finally cutting off the source of heat, or so weakening
the system, that it yields to the attack of some malady. To
sustain the animal in proper condition, then, requires a supply
of food proportioned to the degree of cold to which it is ex-
posed; and it is therefore obvious, that, by avoiding exposure
to cold, we save food.

The Ayrshire dairy farmer gives his cows a liberal supply of
dairy food, when dry, for if allowed to sink in condition during
that period, their milk will be so much diminished after calving
as to overbalance the saving effected in their keep. He does
a little more than just what will “bring them through the win-
ter.” A milch cow must have good board and lodging all the
year round, if her owner does not want to be penny-wise and
pound-foolish.

We would also draw the attention of farmers to the fact,
that animals who have descended from ancestors which have
been well fed and well treated, require to be better fed and
treated, in order to keep their organization up to its highest
point of development, than the same kind of animals whose

348 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

ancestors had been badly fed and badly treated, would require,
to keep their organization up to its highest point, which might
be very low in the scale of organic expansion.

Bulls that are kept for the purpose of breeding, should be fed
during the season in which they are put to cows, on nutritious
food of a more concentrated nature, than at other periods of
the year. The food which would be most suitable for the dairy
cow, would not be most suitable for the bull, at the period
referred to, as it would produce an enlargement of the abdo-
men, and otherwise unfit him for the purpose for which he was
required at that time. We would also recommend that the act
of milking be performed with great caution, or the quantity
and quality will be inferior. The milk should be drawn quickly,
and not a drop should be left. Whatever is suffered to remain
in the udder will be reabsorbed, and no more will be generated
than is necessary to supply the quantity withdrawn. There is,
therefore, a double loss by the neglect, and of the best milk,

too.

HORSES.

WORCESTER WEST.
Report of the Committee.

Your committee have endeavored to attend to the duty
assigned them. They suppose the society intend to award the
premiums to those horses that best perform the tasks most
frequently imposed upon them, that best discharge the most
important functions for which they are most usually kept. The
horse is one of the most useful animals for the wants of man.
He is his attendant in peace and in war, in prosperity and
adversity. He carries him to the nuptial banquet and to his
last home. The cultivation of the horse in his highest capacity
is probably one of the most important considerations which
should engage the attention of this society. We have presumed
to say, that that horse which, in a light carriage, with a beauti-

HORSES. 349

ful figure, fine action, and the greatest speed, can perform,
daily, during the year the greatest number of miles, and keep
in good working condition, all other things being equal, is the
best horse. <A horse should weigh nearly one thousand pounds,
have small ears, well cut and turned head and neck, to give him
elegance of appearance, high and thin shoulders that he shall
not stumble; large, round, deep chest, and belly that will crave
and digest an abundant quantity of food to supply the loss of
bone and muscle by vigorous action. He should have wide,
strong, but thin limbs, that he may have sufficient action and
power, without cocking his knees and ankles or spraining his
gambrels. Nothing is less desirable than a small eater—you
would of course have a small worker. He should have a small,
quick gait, as long strides require more power for the distance
than short ones, and carry the carriage with less ease to both
rider and horse. All his movements should be easy and elegant,
without the use of the check or the art of the driver. Artificial
horses, like artificial men, are soon found out, and rate for what
they are worth. He should neither interfere nor overreach, but
both can be remedied to a considerable extent by shoeing. But
a horse that hits badly forward is almost useless as a roadster.
A slight slope to the rump changes the angle of the hind legs
so a horse can throw the hind feet further forward at each
stride, and a short back and high shoulders not only give more
strength, but produce the same effect for the forefeet, and pre-
vent stumbling. A round body gives more room for lungs and
stomach and shows flesh more readily, and appears better while
thin. He should have a sound, vigorous, healthy, active, strong
constitution. About the external marks of a good constitution
there may be some difference of opinion. For, like man, the
breeds are so mixed that we sometimes get the external marks
of one breed, and the internal constitution of another. But it
is pretty generally admitted that the usual external marks of a
good constitution are, large thin legs, deep, round chest and
belly, course, heavy mane and tail, black legs and hoofs; and
when we find a light sorrel, with white or light thin mane and
tail, fine hair, small, delicate legs, light colored hoofs, we usually
have a horse that takes cold easy, and has a thin skin that the
flies annoy, and that galls badly, and that has a thin shell to his

350 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

hoof, and that soon becomes tender in his fore feet by use.
Our citizens have paid more attention to the general appear-
ance and the size of their colts, than to their qualities as
travellers on the road. From this has resulted that enormous
quantity of fat we see piled on to our studs through the winter,
that makes them look much like geese fattened for the market.
A horse should have bold, high temper that will not brook ill
usage without resenting it with indignation to the amount of
his ability, and then with kind usage we shall have a kind
servant, but one of power. A horse without temper is like a
man without spirits, feeble and inefficient.

O. Martin, Chairman.

HAMPDEN.

Report of the Committee.

The exhibition of horses has heretofore furnished the most
interesting and exciting feature of the second day of our exhi-
bition, but on this occasion it was most sadly reversed. It
was not, as Shakspeare has it, “ My kingdom for a horse,” but
most emphatically, my horse for an umbrella, and most fortunate
was he who had one without a horse. The pelting of the storm
was too severe for man or horse without some covering. Ex-
pectation had been elevated to a high figure, in anticipation of
a rich display of young horses particularly... The entries which
had previously been made were forty-two, including fifty-four
animals, many of which were of the most desirable stock. The
Morgan, the Black Hawk, Hambletonian, and Kentucky Hunter,
were to have been represented by their offspring, but were
spared the mortification of having their lineal descendants con-
tend for the poor pittance offered by a small county society,
while themselves were being prepared to enter the field of
competition for the higher honors and rewards offered at the
National Horse Show, the very mention of which still tingles
the ear with delight, and deeply does it leave the impress that
there is an increasing interest aroused in this county in the
improvement of the horse; this we trust is not an ephemerous
feeling, but one which will continue to be cherished by the

HORSES. 351

farmers of Hampden. That interesting exhibition has clearly
demonstrated many facts in relation to this stock of domestic
animals, which are available by every one interested. A prac-
tical lesson has been placed before them, from which they must
be thoughtless indeed if they do not avail themselves of some
tangible advantage. But we must return to the reports of the
several awarding committees at our own show. These, like
our exhibition, will be found in unison with the old adage, “a
short horse is soon curried.”

FRANKLIN.

From the Report of the Committee.

The committee have been much gratified to learn that the
interest in the subject of breeding horses has much increased
during the past year in this county; believing, as they do, that
it may be rendered a source of greater profit to the farmers
of this region than it has yet been. The horse that is needed
in a business community is, emphatically, what has been called
the “horse of all work,” and that breed is unquestionably the
best which combines the largest number of those qualities
which render an animal fit for various duties and labors. For
these purposes a horse should possess physical strength and
endurance for the drawing of burdens and carrying loads, and
yet should have lightness and quickness enough for use on the
road; above every thing, he should have a sound and healthy
constitution, for without this, he must be useless for either of
the above purposes.

In breeding horses, it should be remembered that it is as
cheap, or nearly so, to raise a good horse as to raise a poor
one, if the necessary pains are takenat the start. But nothing
can be a more useless waste of time and money, than to under-
take to raise good stock from animals which are themselves
worthless. The first thing to be regarded, then, is the sound-
ness and health of the animals from which we are undertaking
to breed; and, if in that respect, they are unsatisfactory, it is
far better to abandon the idea of raising stock from them, than
to devote three or four years to colts which will not pay for the

352 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

time and trouble expended. In this respect, no greater error
can be committed than by those who seem to suppose that if a
horse is sound, they may use a mare which is either unsound,
or old, and worn-out, instead of a vigorous and healthy animal.
For good stock, itis necessary that the colt should be descended
from both a sire and dam which are not the victims of any un-
soundness or disease, but which have, in themselves, those
qualities which are desirable to have transmitted to their off-
spring. It is true, that good stock is not always raised, when
the sire and dam are both good, but in the far greater majority
of instances, there can be no question that the stock will par-
take essentially of the character of its parentage.

CHARLES DEVENS, JR., Chairman.

BERKSHIRE.
Report of the Committee.

The committee to whom was referred the ardous yet inter-
esting duty of deciding upon the merits of the animals pre-
sented under this division of the show, have been highly
gratified in witnessing the increasing interest among the far-
mers of Berkshire, in the improvement of their horses. We
believe that on no former anniversary of this society, has there
been so fine a display of mares and colts as was brought before
us on this occasion, a fact which we look upon as evidence con-
clusive, that the zeal that has for a considerable time past ani-
mated a large portion of the farmers of Vermont and New
York, has found its way into Western Massachusetts; and we
trust it is destined here to expand and rise till old Berkshire
shall become as famous for the raising, matching and training of
good horses, as she already is for her success in the breeding
of fine cattle. Our hopes in this matter are based upon the
well-known fact that a large portion of the farmers of this com-
munity are ever prepared to adopt, and pursue with eagerness,
any honest calling that will ensure to them a fair remuneration
for the outlay required.

And what, in the line of stock raising, offers a more generous
reward than this, where the foal of a few months only, will

HORSES. 353

command a price varying from thirty to seventy-five dollars;
and at a more advanced age, prices are often realized that
doubly compensate for all trouble and expense on their behalf.
We know that some breeders sell their stock for prices much
below these figures, but whenever this occurs it will generally
be found to be the result of injudicious breeding. Too many
farmers, in our opinion, are in fault in this respect, either from a
lack of judgment to guide them toa proper selection of animals
from which to breed, or, what is still more to be deprecated,
when their judgment is sufficient to direct them to the proper
course, they are deterred therefrom by the narrow considera-
tion that the use of such animals is attended with an expense
above that required for those of an ordinary character, not
considering that the price paid for a good article is almost
universally found to be more profitably invested than that paid
for an inferior one.

But the question may be very properly agitated, What is
the character and style of the race of horses most proper to
be bred by the farmers of Berkshire? A solution of this ques-
tion, satisfactory to the tastes of all, we know to be almost
impossible. For, were it put to the sportsman, he would un-
doubtedly say, without regard to size or form, give me the
horse that has the greatest speed, as any one that has not a
capacity sufficient for two forty,is beneath my notice. Were it
proposed to the drayman or cartman, he would undoubtedly
manifest much less regard for the speed of the animal, and
decide in favor of the one that has the greatest power of
draught. But neither of these decisions are satisfactory to us,
as we think a race of animals of this character would not meet
the demand of this community; and, occupying the position
that we do on this occasion, we trust we shall be pardoned
though we give a free expression of our views on this point,
asking you to let them pass only for what, in your opinion,
they are worth.

We would recommend for size the horse whose weight, when
in flesh suitable for labor, is from 1,100 to 1,200 pounds; whose
form shall be such as to satisfy the demand of the most tasteful
eye; possessed with a constitution that shall enable him, when
_ under proper feed, to endure all reasonable toil that may be
45*

354 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

laid upon him; with limbs of medium length and size, supported
by cords of full size; with joints not too prominent, but so pro-
tected by ligament and cartilage as to secure them against
deformity and ruin by spavins or ringbones; with a spirit and
power of locomotion that shall secure any reasonable driver
against the exercise of impatience when on the road, and with
a style in all his movements that shall confirm the truth of the
poet, when he said of this noble animal :-—

The steed you pompously bestride,

Shares with his lord the pleasure and the pride.
And lastly, possessed with courage sufficient to secure him
against alarm, and a docility of temper that shall not be excited
to resistance though the vehicle to which he may be attached, |
with all its precious freight of wife, children, &c., should,
through the frailty of the harness, or any other casuality, be
precipitated against him.

To point the breeders of horses to any race, in which all
these qualities are combined, may be a difficult task; yet we
believe that embraced under the head of Morgan, approaches
nearer the standard we have raised than any other now known
to us; and although we may not at present have within our bor-
ders any of the very best samples of this breed, we are favored
with those of that or of other breeds that have produced a de-
cided improvement in our stock, within a few years past, among
which are the “ Young Hambletonian,’ more recently known
by the name of “ Waterloo,” owned by Messrs. Williams and
Bright, of Adams, and “Young Black Hawk,” owned by S,
Hooper, of West Stockbridge. The stock of the former has
probably borne off more of the prizes offered by this society,
on mares and colts, than that of any other horse yet. We be-
lieve his stock may prove better adapted to the labor of the
trotting course than that of the farm. He has a number of
times been exhibited before this society, and justly partaken of
its munificence. The latter has twice been a successful com-
petitor among the stallions presented on former occasions, and
although his standing point has ever been within the borders of
the State of New York, yet it has not been so remote as to
prevent a liberal dispensation of his favors among the breeders
of our own county, and favors indeed they have proved, for

HORSES. 355

his stock, although not any of it is yet fully matured, has almost
universally commanded high prices, and in one instance a filly
of only three years brought, in the city of New York, the pretty
sum of five hundred dollars.

Others have been more recently introduced into the country
which bid fair to prove valuable acquisitions to our best of
stock-getters, among which is a Morgan horse, owned and pre-
sented on this occasion by Homer Winchel, of Lanesboro’, and,
as the sequel will show, received a favorable notice from the
committee.

Our attention was also directed to a three years old colt,
named “Morgan Ratler,’ owned by A. W. Kellogg, of Pitts-
field, which we considered decidedly the best on the ground,
although not offered for premium. His appearance and pedigree
are such as to justify us in entertaining high anticipations of
his success as a stock-getter.

Morean Lewis, Chairman.

HOUSATONIC.

From the Report of the Committee.

It is a trite and common-place remark, but none the less true
that the horse is a noble as well as a useful animal. When we
consider his qualities of docility and intelligence,—his symmetry
and beauty of form, his wonderful adaptation to the require-
ments of labor, pleasure or profit, he is ever the same truthful,
faithful creature, following us as a2 companion in our amusement,
and facilitating, literally, our progress “along life’s beaten
track,” and cheerfully furnishing sinewy limbs and a broad
chest, in the fulfilment of earth’s primal curse, as he too feels
the trickling of the beaded sweat in the arena of toil.

To-day, he is seen with showy trappings, in all the “ pride,
pomp and circumstance of glorious war,” proudly tossing his
head at the sound of the cavalry trumpet, and “ snuffing the bat-
tle afar off.’ To-morrow, he creeps: slowly and sadly in the
funeral van, to the poor soldier’s last barrack. He never chafes
and frets at want of position. Whether he bears

356 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

«Young Harry with his beaver on,
To turn and wind a fiery Pegasus,
~ And witch the world with noble horsemanship ; ”’

or makes personal and real, our own witty poet’s invocation—

«‘ Ay! gather your reins, and crack your thong,

And bid your steed go faster ;

He does not know, as he rambles along

That he has a fool for his master,”
the horse is still submissive, faithful and true. All willingly,
he jogs the farmer’s wife, and the farmer’s corn to mill—all
willingly he gallops to the wedding or creeps to meeting.
With equal willingness he draws the gilded coach, and the un-
painted wagon; he saws wood, sails ferry-boats, threshes grain,
wins golden cups at the Derby, and drags the railroad car
when the locomotive is tired. Saddled or “ bare-back,” har-
nessed or unharnessed, bitted or haltered, in rain or shine,
in summer and in winter, in the sands of Sahara, or threading
with cautious foot the defiles of the icy hill path, he is still
the same patient, proud, ambitious, faithful creature, thanking
you generously and warmly for every extra measure of oats,
and rebelling not, even when his dream of a warm stable, and
a well-filled manger, is broken by the crack of a whip, and the
stinging of the spur.

Great improvements are being made every year in the breed
and quality of horses. Holding ourselves neutral, upon the
moral question involved in the temptation and associations of
the race-course and trotting-track, it must be conceded that the
efforts of horse-men, so called, in the development of great
bottom and speed for their own purposes of competition, have
also brought out, in a marked degree, those qualities which
have rendered *the horse a far more valuable servant, than the
small, ungainly, and uncombed creature, which sneaked out of
the Ark, and was so little regarded in the time of the “ Father
of the Faithful,’ that Moses left him out of the inventory,
when Isaac administered upon his estate, and carefully num-
bered his asses instead !

The light and beautiful symmetry of the Godolphin-Arabian,
was mingled with the tough, stout limbs of the Flanders mare;
the strong-mouthed and heavy-headed French charger, crossed
with the graceful Andalusian; the Norman English war-horse,

HORSES. 357

crossed with the fleet mare of Egypt, in the same age that wit-
nessed the crossing of Richard’s two-handed sword, with the
Damascus blade of Saladin, and the result has been “ Belfoun-
der,” “American Eclipse,” “ Black Morgan,” “ Lady Suffolk,” and
“Taconey.” Culley’s description of a fine agricultural horse,
has never been improved upon,

“His head should be as small as the proportion of the
animal will admit; his nostrils expanded, and muzzle fine; his
eyes cheerful and prominent; ears small, upright, and near
together; his neck joined gracefully to the head; his shoulders
well thrown back; arm muscular and tapering from the shoul-
der to meet a fine, straight, sinewy, and bony leg; hoof cireu-
lar and wide at the heel; chest deep and full at the girth;
loins broad and straight, and the body round; quarters long,
and tail set nearly in the same line with the back; legs clear
and fine-boned, and leg-bones lathy or flat.”

The exhibition of the present year, in spite of the great
inclemency of the weather, compared favorably with any for-
mer exhibition, especially in farm and single horses.

CuarLes Hupson, Chairman.

PLYMOUTH.
From the Report of the Committee.

The committee would beg leave to make a few remarks on
the subject of rearing colts. During the first summer, the foals
may be allowed to run with their dams until four months old.
They should then be weaned and kept in yards containing
open sheds, with racks and mangers for receiving their food,
which ought to be the sweetest high ground hay that can be
procured. Bran or oats may be given, but not to exceed one
quart a day. It is a common practice, on weaning colts, to
put them into warm stables on plank floors (which is very
likely to cause ringbone) during the following winter, from a
notion that they are not, at that early age, able to support the
cold of an open shed. This idea is unquestionably wrong.
From the nature of their future employment, they must neces-
sarily be exposed to every vicissitude of weather, and cannot
be too early inured to a certain degree of hardship. Dry

358 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

hovels are far to be preferred to warm stables for their shel-
ter the first, second and third winters.

Nauum M. Trisou, Chairman.

BRISTOL.

From the Report of the Committee.

And the horse, too, about which your committee are to pass
judgment, is by far the most noble and useful domestic animal ;
and scarcely can there be a spot found upon the whole earth,
where civilized man is found, but the horse is also found as his
assistant and companion, and rarely can a man be found whose
generous feelings are not excited in view of a noble horse; and
equally as rare will it be to find a man (and may I not add
lady also) whose blood does not boil with indignation, when a
greater brute (in the form of man) is guilty of cruelty towards
him. No matter how many other modes of conveyance may
be invented, the horse will always be the servant of man.

It seemed to be supposed by many, that the application of
steam-power in moving the vast amount of freight and baggage
over the country and to our cities, would lessen the demand
for horses as beasts of burden, and that they would decline
in price, but the contrary is the result; for a very great por-
tion of the freight, bagga ze, and passengers which are carried
by steam, do not arrive at their exact place of destination
without the use of horses, and both demand and price have
largely increased.

C. Lronarp, Chairman.

SHEEP.

FRANKLIN.
From the Report of the Committee.

Fourteen entries were made, of South Down, Irish Smut,
French and Spanish Merino, and Silesian variety—all of which
specimens were of great excellence.

SHEEP. 359

In regard to fine woolled bucks, the committee find it very
difficult to decide satisfactorily, even to theirown minds. The
recent introduction of the French Merino and the Silesian
varieties may prove to be a great acquisition to our sheep
husbandry, but we think they have not been sufficiently tested
to warrant us in recommending them too strongly to our
farmers.

ee

Zo lp

Cs

os a

_—- ~——
et ora
———
a ,

‘NVU GIOMSLOO AHAOUMWI WO ‘AUMIHSAUOIXO MAN
vos
— ih

A Silesian buck, entered by Thomas J. Field, which sheared
eighteen and a half pounds of unwashed wool, of two years’
growth, had the finest fleece of any on exhibition, the weight of
the fleece having been considerably diminished in consequence
of his having been imported during that time. A lot of French

360 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

Merino’s, both ewes and bucks, entered by Aaron Buddington,
showed great skill and judgment in selecting and rearing this
kind of sheep.

The exhibition of fine woolled sheep was very creditable to
their owners. A lot of five Spanish Merino ewes, entered by
David Dennison, the committee regard as of superior excellence ;
but as the society’s rules required the entry of six, we could
not, of course, award to him a premium, but would recommend
a gratuity of a volume of the Report of the Commissioner of
Patents. An Irish buck, belonging to Dorus Bascom, of Gill,
estimated to weigh two hundred and fifty pounds, being four
years old, is a noble animal, and we recommend a like gratuity
to Mr. Bascom, of a volume of the Commissioner’s Report.

The specimens of South Downs exhibited were very gratify-
ing to the committee. Where all are so superior, it is difficult
to discriminate, and we cannot too strongly recommend to our
farmers, increased attention to this variety of sheep. The
statistics of sales and profits furnished by their owners would
seem calculated to induce a general rush for the business. ~~

The following are samples:—Samuel Fisk sold thirty-four
lambs from twenty ewes for $4.25 per head—sold in August.
William Wood sold thirty-seven from thirty-five ewes for the
sum of $175—sold in August—bringing $65 per head for twenty-
five, and $4 per head for twelve.

The exhibition of sheep, this day, seems to have exceeded
those of this society heretofore, both as to numbers and quality
of animals; and yet the committee feel compelled to express
their regret that there is not a more general interest manifest-
ed in raising and improving this valuable stock in Franklin
County. They believe that a large portion of this county is
well adapted to this branch of husbandry, and if our farmers
would turn their attention more to it, the aggregate income of
the county would be greatly increased.

All which is respectfully submitted.

R. H. Leavitt, Chairman.

fibitoha:

Beh. (1h Wde
+ te 4

th (SAV .0'1:

ee

. Pra
, ne ify
a) elle

“eegT SMONIGIYX at) 1 SAjoIOy peasy
YOON ogy Aq papawwmey SVL I24q ISH 2) YIYAd LJ “sseuyy ‘UBypoaN yse\4 ‘ULM Toy UOMO] ‘iq Aq parg

"HVOED HIOATAS GHAOHdMHNE

L———_

ny
Opes)

a ;

AZ
ass

SWINE. 361

BERKSHIRE.
From the Report of the Committee.

There were twenty entries of fine wool sheep for the society’s
premiums, all of which were excellent specimens, and richly
deserving the society’s bounty. The committee were unanimous
in awarding the premiums. The committee were very favorably
impressed with the exhibition of sheep by Mr. Stockwell, of
Vt., as being just the kind adapted to our climate, and to. the
wants of our people, and suited to the requirement of the man-
ufacturer, carrying a fine heavy fleece, free from gum and oil.

Your committee were unanimous in recommending some mod~
ification in the rule in awarding premiums on fine wool sheep ;.
that giving premiums on fine wool alone without any regard to:
form or size, ought not to be encouraged by the society.

There may be differences in opinion as to the variety of
sheep that are the most profitable, but as the main object is to
make money, your committee are of opinion that the best test
is to ascertain the variety that will give the greatest proceed
from a given amount of feed, or in other words the greatest.
proceed from a given number of acres.

Your committee are aware that location may make some
difference, but they now speak for our county, where the grow-
ing of wool and meat is combined.

S. Huspevi, Chairman.

SWINE.

WORCESTER NORTH.

From the Report of the Committee.

The committee are deeply impressed with profound gratitude
at the high honor which has been so spontaneously, and with-
out solicitation on their part, conferred upon them. They
boldly assert, here in their place, that they have sat in judg-
ment upon one of the most useful classes of animals in the

46*

362 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

whole catalogue. What else affords such agreeable, such
wholesome food—is preserved by salt so easily in all climates—
is procured and reared with so little expense, and when fairly
packed in the family pork barrel, sends such a spirit of inde-
pendence to every member thereof? Let old winter come in
all its frigidity—old boreas blow his creaking blast, till not a
single autumnal leaf shivers to the breeze, the happy bipeds
who gather around the cheerful fireside of “sweet home,” from
parents to four-year-olds, can sit at the family fire place (woul |
that we had more of them) and complacently look at back-log
and fore-stick, hear the joyful serenade of snapping during the’
longest winter eve; raising their thoughts, their emotions, their
eratitude to that Source from whence all our blessings flow,—
which always adds dignity and elevation to humanity,—for why ?
there are layers enough still left in the barrel of this nutritious
food, till spring time and harvest.

The committee will now indicate what they deem the essen-
- tial characteristics of a good hog. He should not be too long,
full in the head and cheek, short neck, good round carcass and
full quarters. Formerly the Berkshire breed was preferred,
but now it is believed that a cross with the small Chinese
breed is the most profitable, they being susceptible of consider-
able weight, with comparative light feeding, while the cross
has produced a more mild disposition in the animal.

Your committee deem it their duty to urge upon every family
that has a small patch or garden, to rear their own pork. The
public have but a vague, imperfect idea of the large sums of
money which might be saved by substituting hogs for dogs.
In the expense it will be less, while, by a little care and econo-
my, by the saving the wash or swill, the weeds of the garden,
and surplus vegetables, adding a little corn meal at the end,
they may eat their own pork, in lieu of eating as they do, many
times, the rattlesnake, beech-nut pork of the West. Our native
born citizens may well take a useful hint from our Celtish
brethren, with their clean, well-washed pigs, well-secured pig-
stys, and potato patches to feed them.

To the farmer, they would say, build warm, comfortable hog
houses, which shall shelter this abused animal from our keen
wintry winds, and he will pay you for it in additional pork.

SWINE. 363

Commence to breed largely from the most approved stock,
upon a large scale. The little grunters will always sell to
profit. Instead of fatting four or five hogs a year, you can
about as well fat forty or fifty, and let us have the pleasing, the
profitable reflection, here in this part of the county, that, let
others do what they will, here we save our own bacon.

A. Crocker, Chairman.

HAMPSHIRE.

From the Report of the Committee.

The show, as a whole, has been a very good one. The sev-
eral varieties of swine, for which a premium was offered by the
society, have been well represented, as have also the different
breeds most esteemed in this region. Some specimens, how-
ever, appeared to be of sucha mixture of breeds, that it would
puzzle a farmer, and probably any body else, to trace their
genealogy, or to call them any thing but hogs.

The best and cheapest mode of producing the best pork, is
a subject of very general interest. Probably, more families
within the limits of our society participate.in the production
of pork, than of any other variety of meat. And the same
remark is doubtless true, in regard to most country towns in
New England, and throughout the United States. Every step
of progress, therefore, in the selection and improvement of
breeds, in determining the most suitable food, the best and
most economical mode of its preparation, and the best general
treatment of swine, is an advantage shared directly by large
numbers. And it becomes us, in this part of the United States,
especially, to look well to this matter, that it may be profitable
for us to produce pork for market. The quality and mode of
producing it must be superior, or our western brethren will
supply our markets, and even our next-door neighbors. The
farmer who lives a thousand miles from Boston, and produces
his corn (doubtless the best food for fattening swine) on the
cheap and fertile soil of the West, at a cost, varying from six-
pence to fifty cents a bushel, can now, in many cases, by the
aid of railroads, transport his pork to that city for about the

364 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

same sum that it used to cost our fathers, twenty or thirty
y ears ago, to take it to the same market.

Notwithstanding the odds against us, pork has been, and will
probably continue to be, produced among us ata profit. But
it can be done only by good management, and by the production
of a superior article. The circurastances surrounding the
Massachusetts farmer—whose corn is worth a dollar a bushel,
and who expects to rear and fatten his pork in a pen of mode-
rate size, with a small yard connected, and to feed them with
the refuse of the dairy and kitchen, and witha variety of other
food, raw and cooked—are quite different from those of his
western brother, who rears his pigs on the prairies or oak-
openings, and fattens by turning them into his corn-fields.
What would be wisdom in one case, might be folly in the other.
The breed of swine, for instance, that would be profitable for
one, might be poorly adapted to the purposes of the other.
This may be illustrated by reference to the last Agricultural
Report of the United States Commissioner of Patents. Before
preparing the report, the Commissioner had sent a circular to
various parts of the United States, in which he proposed this
question, among others, “ What are the best breeds of hogs ?”

New Hampshire answers, “the Suffolk;” Connecticut, “a
mixture of ‘old fashioned hogs’ with Berkshire and the China
breed, generally does very well;’ New York, by three of her
citizens, separately, “ Berkshires and Leicesters ;” New Jersey,
“a cross with the Berkshires ;” Pennsylvania, “a cross of the
Berkshires and Chester County ;” Virginia, “Irish Grazier and
mixed Berkshires are our common stock;”’ Georgia, “the best
breeds for the climate are the Woburn and Grazier;” Missis-
sippi, “ the best hogs I have tried are the Berkshires ;”’ Texas,
“Trish Grazier ;’ Tennessee, “the common old Grazier mixed
with the Hindoo breed ;” Kentucky, “ Woburn ;” Ohio, “ Leices-
ter, Bedford, Chinese, and Calcutta;”’ Michigan, “the Berk-
shires are too small, and are nearly extinct. We have the
Byfield and Leicester;’ Indiana, “Berkshires, Russia, and
China ;” Missouri, “ Berkshires, or a cross between the black
Berkshire and white Irish ;” Iowa, “ China and Byfield. Berk-
shires are not much esteemed of late ;’ Florida, “for the range,
or shift-for-yourself system, the long-nosed Pike stands A No.

SWINE. 365

1. For a system of partial feeding, the Corbet, grass, and a
cross with the China hog are preferred.”

It is doubtless true, that in some cases, a knowledge of the
different breeds would have led to different answers. But it is
quite as true and evident, that no one breed is best adapted
to all locations and circumstances.

The same report may also be cited‘to show the different re-
sults obtained by various individuals, as to the weight of pork
produced by a given quantity of food. A question proposed
in the circular was, “how many pounds of meat will one
hundred pounds of corn yield?” Comparatively few of the
responses definitely answer this particular question. But those
given, vary from eight to forty pounds. Now if there be, in
fact, so wide a difference as these answers indicate, it appears
to us that it must be, in a great measure, owing to the causes
before suggested; such as adaptation of the breed to the cir-
cumstances of the farmer, and the modes of rearing and fatten-
ing. The Commissioner, in a note appended to the 301st page
of the report, expresses his own opinion, that “one hundred
pounds of corn-meal ought to produce twenty-five pounds of
pork,” and he adds, that “three and a half pounds of meal gave
Mr. Ellsworth, former Commissioner of Patents, a pound of
pork.” This last would be twenty-eight and four-sevenths
pounds of pork to one hundred pounds of meal. If the farm-
ers of Hampshire County can attain to Commissioner Ells-
worth’s success, we need not fear that pork cannot be pro-
duced at a profit, in the Connecticut Valley.

SamMuEL Nasu, Chairman.

FRANKLIN,

From the Report of the Committee.

The English alphabet probably affords no three letters
which, united, are more significant than those which compose
the word hog. The word swine is altogether too chaste and
classical to impart a correct idea of this animal. We are
aware that the word hog is not used in Scripture, but without

366 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

going into any nice biblical philology, we contend that this un-
couth, outlandish, three lettered monosyllable, would better
express the opprobrium which all the sacred writers seem to
have attached to this animal; we say opprobrium, for the first
authentic mention of swine is in connection with the defiled
meats prohibited by the Mosaic law; and the last, is where a
legion of devils drove a herd of two thousand down a steep
mountain, until they were choked to death in the bottom of the
sea.

We have glanced at profane history with little better suc-
cess. Goldsmith, in his “Animated Nature,” and Buffon, in his
“Natural History,” both speak of this animal as a glutton,
sordid and brutal in his domestic state, whose sensations are
as gross as his shape is unsightly; destitute of attachment,
incapable of instruction, his whole life being divided between
sleep and gluttony.

Yet the swine has outlived the higher law of Moses, the
rude attacks of Goldsmith and Buffon, until he has become, in
our domestic economy, an animal second in importance only to
the cow; whilst in the market it is one of the great staples of
the world. The family circle is now incomplete without a pig;
the farmer, with small means, would almost as soon part
with the crib and porringer of his last responsibility, as the
cozy pen and trough of his little grunter, to which he looks for
future subsistence. More secure than lands and houses, the
law itself exempts from attachment one of these animals for
every family.

The first thing in rearing swine is to select the right breed.
The Suffolk, or a cross between that and some other, is proba-
bly the best. You might as well try to find a miser’s name on
a subscription paper, as to undertake to get the first quality of
pork from a long-legged, long-eared, long-nosed, large-boned,
rawny hog; whilst the opposite qualities, with good feeding
and attention, will ensure fine meat. Hogs should have regu-
lar meals to fat well; unless this is done, he will “ squeal off
flesh” about as fast as you can put it on. The Irishman fed
his pig every other day, and when asked the reason, said he
liked streaks of lean and fat together.

The trough of the swine should be kept clean; he wants no

SWINE. 367

knife, fork, or spoon, no napkin or table-cloth; but, as has well
been said, “he likes a clean plate.”

The hog-pen is quite as important to the swine, as the dining-
room, parlor, or bed-chamber to man. There is more ignorance
and unpardonable animal abuse on this subject than on almost
any other; we do not now speak of the yard, which should be
large and roomy, but the pen should be well built, dry, airy,
well floored and roofed, and constantly supplied with fresh
litter. It is indispensable that hogs should have a clean, dry,
comfortable, wholesome lodging place.

On the subject of food, no uniform rule can be laid down. It
must depend upon the situation and circumstances of each par-
ticular case. Corn will, of course, always be an important ele-
ment in the food of fatting hogs; but apples, boiled and mixed
with meal, or boiled potatoes, will be found very nutritious and
profitable, especially where orchards are so abundant as they
are with us. Store hogs will eat almost any and every thing;
and the proper and profitable management of them will tax the
ingenuity, patience and industry of the farmer; weeds, corn-
stover, the wash of the dairy and the table, small potatoes,
windfalls and other poor apples, beets, and corn, unfit for other
purposes, may all be turned -to the best account with store
hogs.

Manure is one of the most important objects in the business
of swine rearing. This is the great point where so many of
our farmers fail. By proper management store pigs will pay
for their keeping by the manure they make. Why so many
barren, unproductive farms? What need of such scant crops
of hay and grain, within a stone’s throw of your hog-pen and
yard? None, whatever. If the hog-pen cannot be constructed
to connect with the barn, stable, and yard, then build a good
large yard to connect with the hog-pen; cart in muck, peat,
leaves, straw, dirt, and refuse, and decayed vegetation of all
kinds; repeat the experiment as often as it will answer. Let
your young litters in upon it, to practice the maxim, “root, pig,
or die;” and as the sports and pleasures of pighood begin to
decay, and the sober realities of hoghood and old age come
stealing on, let the older members of the family understand
that life to them is short, and whatever they do, either for their

368 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

=

own comfort and growth, or to enrich their owners, must be
done quickly. Many cords of manure, now so scarce and
valuable, may thus be made every year by a few hogs, and in
good time all our homesteads and farms be made to exhibit
new evidences of productiveness and beauty, thrift and profit.

Most of the swine exhibited partook more or less of the Suf-
folk breed. We believe great improvement may be made in
this county in rearing swine ; and we trust that future exhibitions
will present, if not better, at least specimens more numerous
and in greater variety.

W. GriswoLD, Chairman.

BERKSHIRE.

From the Report of the Committee.

The Berkshire farmers have this year presented your commit-
tee with a “feast of fat things.” ty

Twenty-three entries were made, each one of which was highly
creditable to its proprietor. The committee were unanimously
of the opinion that a finer display of swine has never been
made in the county, and they are happy to infer from this ex-
hibition that our farmers are devoting that care to this depart-
ment which its importance so well merits.

Of the different breeds presented to the inspection of your
committee, we are inclined to favor a cross of the Suffolk with
our co.nmon swine, as likely to produce the best and most
profitable pigs.

Rosert W. ADAM, Chairman.

NORFOLK.

From the Report of the Committee.

Probably no county in the State can show so good a stock
of swine, as can the County of Norfolk, diligent care having
been taken in the selection and importation of the choicest
breeds in vogue.

Although the number shown was sufficient to fill nearly all

SWINE. 369

the pens, and the swine were, in every instance, excellent, still
the amount intended to have been shown, would have trebled
those on the grounds, had the weather proved propitious. The
committee learned from many individuals, known to be good
breeders of the “ Improved Suffolk,” that the pigs were boxed
to be forwarded, but detained over till the second day, hoping
for more favorable weather.

As previously stated, nearly all the swine were of the “Im-
proved Suffolk,” or that stock largely crossed with the Middle-
sex or the Mackay. In order, therefore, more fully to illustrate
the value of such breeds or varieties as are generally brought
to your grounds, they give a lengthy extract from the admirable
paper on Swine, drawn up by Sanford Howard, Esq., a writer
whose opinion on stock is not second to that of any other
writer.

“The following is a brief notice of some of the breeds of
domestic swine. It is only a few years since it was very com-
mon to hear an expression, signifying that the breed of a hog
is in the food he gets. This notion has been, to a great ex-
tent, eradicated, but it is not yet without advocates. There
are still some who do not believe there is any thing in the breed,
because they ‘cannot see how it is;’ but that is no reason for
denying the fact. They cannot see how it is that in the seeds of
a fruit, (as of the pear, for instance,) all of which are, to outward
appearances, just alike, and probably would appear so by the
nicest chemical test, some will produce fruit the most delicious
and melting, and others, with precisely the same soil and cal-
ture, that which is the most crabbed and austere. They can-
not see how it is that the bear should line and cover his carcass
with fat to an amount nearly equal to half his whole weight,
and which supplies his lamp of life for five months in the year,
while the wolf and the fox remain gaunt and lean. They can-
not see how it is that the same kind of food, when eaten by
the ox, the sheep, the turkey, or the common fowl, produces
meat, which, to human taste, is of very different qualities.

“All these effects are obvious; yet we cannot see their
causes, nor fully understand them. All we can say is, they re-
sult from the varied nature of things. They show, however,
that there is in the original germ of plants and animals, a

4'T*

370 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

principle which produces certain peculiarities greatly affecting
their value, for the purposes of man. This principle is not
only manifested in the characteristics of different species, but
exists more or less in varieties of the same species. We see
its effects in the different kinds of wheat, and in other species
of grain—in varieties of peas, beans, apples, potatoes, &c.,
and in the peculiarities of the different varieties of the dog,
the sheep, the hog, and other domestic animals. It is man’s
business to study these peculiarities, and secure and apply
them in those ways which will render them most subservient to
his wants. |

“In regard to swine, it is to be regretted that the difference
in the various breeds has not been demonstrated by exact ex-
periments. We are, however, in possession of certain facts of
ereat importance in thecase. For instance, many farmers have
found, that on the same amount and kind of food, some hogs
will gain much faster than others; that some will become fat
on uncooked vegetable food, as raw apples, while others require
erain or meal to bring them to a slaughtering condition; that
some will keep in good order, and will thrive on clover or grass
only, while others can scarcely live on such fare; that in some,
the tendency to fatten is so great, that it is necessary to keep
them on very low diet to insure their breeding.

“There is not only a difference in the amount of meat which
different swine are capable of acquiring from an equal amount
of food, but there is a great difference in the quality of the
meat. Some persons, doubting this, may say, ‘pork is pork,’
so ‘beef is beef;’ but is there not a great difference in the
texture and flavor of beef from cattle of different breeds? This
difference is so well understood in England, that the prices of
beef are, to a considerable extent, regulated by the breed—the
West Highlanders and Galloways taking the first rank, then
the Herefords and Devons, and last, the Short-horns. A simi-
lar scale of prices regulates the market in reference to mutton
from various breeds of sheep. The difference in the meat of
swine is not less striking. Some have a thick skin, with flesh
of an open, coarse texture, and unpleasant flavor; others a thin
skin, with fine-grained, well-flavored flesh. Some convert their
food almost wholly into fat, while in others it enters chiefly into

SWINE. 4 371

the composition of muscle. In some, the fat is accumulated
chiefly on the belly, and is of a soft, oily nature; in others, it is
laid more on the back, and is comparatively firm and hard.

“ Of course, the breed should be chosen with reference to the
purposes in view. If lard-oil is the principal object, the animal
which will give the greatest quantity of soft fat for the food
consumed will be most profitable. For barrelling, ‘clear pork’
is the main object; and the animal which will give the greatest
quantity of solid fat on the back and sides, is preferable. This
is the description of pork which is chiefly consumed in the
Eastern States and in the fisheries. In the Southern and
Western States, pork is used chiefly in the form of ‘bacon’—
the whole of the meat is ‘dry-cured’ and smoked. Where this
is the object, the clear fat which is so much prized in other
cases, is not desirable; but a carcass which gives a considera-
ble proportion of lean with the fat is much better.

“The swine of the United States have been derived chiefly
from Great Britain, though occasional importations have been
made from other countries. The British stock of the present
day consists of various mixtures of the aboriginal race of that
island with various Asiatic stocks—mostly Chinese and Siam-
ese. Youatt, in his treatise, published in 1846, observed that
the old breeds were ‘rapidly losing all traces of individuality
under the various systems of crossing to which they are sub-
jected.’ The old stock, which, ‘with trifling degrees of differ-
ence,’ it is said, ‘was spread over the greater part of Eng-
land,’ is described by Martin as ‘large, coarse, unthrifty, with a
long, broad snout, large flapping ears, low in the shoulders,
long in the back, flat-sided, long in the limbs, and large-boned,
with a thick hide covered with coarse bristles. They were
enormous feeders but slow fatteners; consuming more food
than was repaid by their flesh.’ But he observes that the
‘general system of crossing now pursued tends to the estab-
lishment of a uniform race throughout every country; that is, a
race presenting the same outstanding characteristics.”

Another eminent and judicious writer, speaks as follows :—

“A leading principle in breeding this animal,—and it applies
equally to the horse, the sheep, the ox and the dog—is to
make a cautious selection of the male by whom the female is

372 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

destined to conceive her first progeny, for that male stamps a
character upon every subsequent produce (whether for good
or bad) by other males; “The subsequent progeny of the’
mother will always partake more or less of the character of
the father of the first offspring.” This law is mysterious, but
it has been abundantly proved, (see Giles, in Philosophical
Transactions for 1821,) and need not be here further insisted
on; the fact is established. The selection of the male, then,
is of primary importance; of whatever breed he may be, he
should be as perfect as possible in the good qualities of his
race; he should be free from all blemishes, and be, moreover,
the offspring of parents in all points unexceptionable. A
young boar, intended for breeding from, should be kept sepa-
rate from the sows until about a year old, when his physical
energies will be fairly developed. Form is of more importance
than size; in this latter respect the breeds differ, as they do,
also, in the size of the ears, which in some breeds are flapping,
especially in those which incline to the old stock. Good pigs,
it is true, may show such ears, but small, sharp, erect ears
accompany what may be called blood. In a well-formed boar
the barrels should be rather long and cylindrical, the limbs
should be small in the bone, the hoofs neat and compact, the
skin should be rather loose and mellow, with the bristles fine
but scanty; the snout should be short and sharp, the forehead
rise boldly between the ears, and merge into an arched neck;
the back should be straight and broad; the hams rounded
and ample; the chest should be wide, indicative of the ampli-
tude and vigor of the vital organs; the tail should be slender,
the eyes should be lively, the temper or disposition cheerful,
without moroseness. As to color, some breeds are black,
others are white; but we think that black pigs are thinner in
the skin, and are, moreover, less subject to cutaneous affections.

“Equal care should be taken in the selection of a breeding
sow as of a boar; she should be of good stature and form,
sound, healthy, and free from defects; she should have twelve
teats, at least; for, as may be observed, each little pig selects
its own teat, and keeps to it, so that a pig not having one
belonging to it would in all probability be starved. A sow
not pregnant, whose belly hangs low, almost touching the

SWINE. 373

ground, seldom produces large litters or fine pigs; the pendu-
lous condition of the abdomen is the result of weakness and
relaxation from ill-feeding and ill-breeding, neglect, with other
causes, and is generally accompanied with flat sides, a long
snout, and a raw-boned, unthrifty carcase, yielding coarse meat
which will not repay the outlay of feeding.

“ Rarly breeding not only weakens the sow, but, as her physi-
cal powers are not yet fully developed, results in the produc-
tion of undersized weakly pigs, and perhaps, incomplete as
to number; and these, perhaps, she will scarcely be able to
nourish. A young sow of good stock, who produces a large
litter at her first parturition of pigs, all of equal size, and
proves a good nurse, is valuable; she promises well, for her
first litter may be taken as a sample of those to succeed.
As long as such a sow continues to return to the breeder such
litters twice a year, he will do well to keep her, more especially
if he finds, upon trial, that her progeny fatten kindly, whether
as porkers or bacon hogs. Some persons, after obtaining one
or two litters from a sow have her spayed, and then fattened
off as quickly as possible for bacon. Some keep to their
second or even third year of breeding; but if the last litter
was good, and the sow continues vigorous, it becomes a ques-
tion how far it may not be more advantageous to keep her still
longer, even until the diminished number of pigs produced
indicates a decline in fruitfulness.

“ Gold, sleety weather, with keen winds, is very detrimental
to young pigs, and not favorable to their mother; hence,
early in the spring and late in the summer, or early in the
autumn, are the best periods ofthe year for the production of
the litter. In the spring the fields and paddocks offer fresh
grass and various vegetables, and a run upon the pastures will
not only be a saving to the farmer but of benefit to the young
pigs; besides which, at this season of the year, whey and but-
termilk are abundant, and so continue to be during the greater
part of summer. An autumn litter, again, will have sufficient
time to grow and acquire strength before the severities of mid-
winter; besides, the refuse of the potato crop, and the carrot
beds of the garden generally, and of the mill,,is now at hand in
abundance.

374 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

“A breeding sow should never be overfed; not that she
should be starved—on the contrary, she should be kept, by a
judicious allowance of food, in good condition and perfect
*health, but not fat. A sow when fat is not likely to be fertile,
and moreover, her parturition is sure to be more difficult and
dangerous, and her milk in insufficient quantity, perhaps even
of inferior quality, while her unwieldiness renders her more
liable to overlay her young. When with pig she should have
a commodious and clean sty to herself, and be supplied with
sufficient straw to render her comfortable. She should be
sufficiently fed, and all her wants supplied. All sources of
irritation or annoyance should be avoided, and especially as
the time of parturition approaches. From these causes—
sometimes, perhaps, from craving hunger—a sow will devour
her young; it is said, also, that if she be allowed to devour
the after-birth, a morbid appetite, leading her to fall upon
her litter, will be engendered. For these reasons the sow
should be carefully watched and fed, especially if the par-
turition be her first; and not for these reasons only, but
lest her parturition should prove dangerous or in any way
difficult.

“On no account should two pregnant sows be placed in one
sty, however commodious. They will assault each other, and
at last, perhaps, destroy each other’s young.

“<«Selection, with judicious and cautious admixture, is the
true secret of forming a breed.’ It is thus that all our
improved breeds of domestic animals have been produced,
those of the hog not excepted. Hence, the old, coarse, large-
boned swine have now almost disappeared, and given place to
small-boned breeds, apt to fatten, mature at an earlier age,
affording more delicate meat, less expensive to keep, and,
therefore, altogether more profitable. Such breeds are rapidly
extending themselves, and improvements are going on. Many
landed proprietors pride themselves on the possession of a
particular breed of their own establishment, and remarkable
for good qualities of every kind. In the establishment of
such a stock, indiscriminate selection, and a repetition of
crosses, with no definite object, must be avoided; while, at
the same time, a pertinacious adherence to the plan of breed-

SWINE. 375

ing in and in from the same stock, however excellent, will
ultimately result in its degeneracy. Comparatively speaking,
it is only within a few years that the improved breeds of pigs
have risen up to reward the skill of the breeder. The Chinese
or Siamese, the Neapolitan, and the African varieties, have
greatly contributed to their creation, and continue to modify
those in which a farther cross is desirable. After one or two
crosses, the best progeny is generally selected to inter-breed
again with the original stock, and thus is its improvement
effected.”

The writer first referred to, thus continues :—

“ Before proceeding to notice the various breeds of swine, it
may be observed that the general wants of the community, in
relation to pork, can be best supplied by two descriptions or
classes of hogs; one for supplying the market with meat to be
eaten fresh, and for baconing, as above mentioned, and. the
other for making fat pork for barrelling, &c. This classifica-
tion will therefore be adopted in the remarks which follow.
Those breeds whose special characteristic is the formation of
fat, will be first considered. And, as having been the principal
stock in changing the character of the Old English, we will
notice first of all,

“ The Chinese-—There are doubtless various breeds of
swine in the ‘ Celestial Empire.’ Specimens brought from that
country frequently present so marked a contrast of character
that no one would hesitate to pronounce them of different
breeds. They vary in size and in color, ranging from white to
black. Some of the early importations made to England, and
thence to this country, were black; and the idea appears to
have been held that this was the invariable color of Chinese
swine. Hence Culley, who wrote in the year 1784, speaks of
them as ‘ the Chinese, or black breed.’ Youatt makes two dis-
tinct varieties of the Chinese, the ‘white’ and the ‘black.’ *
The race, however, in all its varieties, possesses the common
characteristic of fattening easily. They are small-boned, and

* It may not generally be known that the progeny of the white hogs transported
from Europe and the United States into the tropical regions of Africa and America
are usually black, and continue of that color through successive generations. How

far this will explain the differences in the color of the Chinese hogs, a series of
physiological inquiries can only determine.

376 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

acquire great weights in proportion to the bone and offal.
Those brought from their native country seldom have that per-
fection of symmetry which is most esteemed in animals of this
kind, and which the cross-bred descendants soon acquire by
skilful breeding. The pure Chinese fatten too much on the
belly and too little on the back, and the fat is inclined to be
soft and oily. Youatt says: ‘They do not make good bacon,
and are often too fat and oily to be generally esteemed as pork.’
The females are sometimes singularly prolific. The improve-
ment which has been effected by means of the Chinese race, has
resulted, in the first place, from lessening the bone and increas-
ing the aptitude to fatten in the stocks with which they have
been crossed, and afterwards selecting, as a breeding stock,
such as possessed the requisite points as to symmetry.

IMPROVED SUFFOLK.

«“ This breed is one of the most highly esteemed and valuable
in the world. Its origin, according to Youatt and Martin, is
the old Suffolk crossed with the Berkshire and Chinese. Youatt
says: ‘Those arising from the Berkshire and Suffolk are not so
well shaped as those arising from the Chinese and Suffolk ;
being coarser, longer-legged, and more prominent about the
hips.’ He concludes: ‘On the whole, there are but few better
breeds in the kingdom than the Improved Suffolk.’ He states
that the greater part of the pigs at Prince Albert’s farm, near
Windsor, are of this breed. Martin says: ‘This breed stands

SWINE. 37T

first,) and he describes the animals as ‘rather small, but com-
pact, short-legged, and small-headed; the body is round, and
they fatten readily.’ Rham, in his ‘Dictionary of the Farm,’
says: ‘Suffolk pigs are perhaps, on the whole, the most popular
of any breed in England.’

“For the introduction of the Improved Suffolk pigs into this
country, we are indebted to the late William Stickney, of
Boston. He made several importations, comprising some of
the best specimens of the breed to be had in England, from
1842 to 1848. He also imported specimens of the Middlesex
and of the White Essex breeds. Since these importations,
there have been others, and the stock is now bred to a con-
siderable extent in New England, and is rapidly spreading over
the country.

“The Suffolks, as before stated, are not large hogs, but attain
maturity at an early age, and may be always in condition to.
kill from the time they are a month old. They readily weigh
from two hundred to three hundred pounds at six to ten months:
old, and a proportionate weight at twelve months. The pork
is so much esteemed, that it generally commands from a cent
to two cents a pound, extra, in Boston market.

“The Middlesex.—This appears to be a popular breed in
parts of England, and has sometimes carried prizes at the shows
of the Smithfield Club. It has been previously stated that Mr.
Stickney imported Middlesex pigs into this country. He re-
ceived a lot in 1844, and another lot in 1848. The breed is
evidently derived from a large infusion of the Chinese with
some larger stock. Our remarks refer to those introduced
here. The color is usually white. The size of the animals is
perhaps somewhat larger than the Suffolk, but the carcass is
less symmetrical; the frame is more loose, the legs less straight,
the knees apt to be turned in, the belly is more hanging, and
the general appearance indicating a softer texture of flesh.
They fatten easily. They have often been crossed with the
Suffolk, but with no advantage to the latter, so far as the writer
has seen. The late Mr. Stickney, continued the stock unmixed
for several years; but it is not known to be so bred by any
one in this country at the present time.

“ The Mackay Breed, formerly well known in Massachusetts,

48*

378 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

was originated by the late Captain John Mackay, of Boston.
He had a farm at Weston, in Middlesex County, on which he
collected many hogs which he procured in various parts of the
world, whither he was led in his commercial intercourse. These
various kinds were bred together, and the result was the pro-
duction of a stock to which his name was applied. The writer
of this article purchased pigs of Captain Mackay at various
times—first in 1830. It can hardly be said that his stock ever
acquired a sufficiently uniform character to justify its being
called a distinct breed. Their greatly diverse origin was
always more or less manifest. They were, however, very
easily fattened and highly profitable. Some inclined to grow
to a large size, yet were always fat, from three weeks old, if
tolerably cared for; and at eighteen months old sometimes
weighed six hundred pounds each, and upwards. In the latter
part of his breeding, Captain Mackay gave his attention more ~
to the propagation of this larger stock. In 1834, he sold all
his swine to Colonel Jaques, of the Ten-Hills Farm, who now
has all of this valuable stock within the writer’s knowledge.
Various circumstances, which it is unnecessary to mention here,
have conspired to nearly annihilate them. Colonel Jaques
has made extensive inquiries, but can hear of none except those
in his own hands.

“The foregoing list comprises most of the breeds which have
been regarded as best adapted to the production of ‘clear
pork.’ Other breeds, which form a greater proportion of lean
property combined with fat, may be more profitable for par-
ticular situations. In cities and large towns a great quantity
of pork is consumed in a fresh state. To be best adapted to
this purpose, swine should be small-boned, only moderately fat,
but plump and meaty, weighing, when dressed, from forty to a
hundred pounds—the flesh fine-grained, and of the best quality
as to flavor. Under this class, and as adapted to baconing, as
before described, may be enumerated the following :—

“The Neapolitan Breed.—Martin, speaking of the excel-
lence of Italian swine, observes: ‘The ancient Romans made
the art of breeding, rearing and fattening pigs, a study, and
elevated, so to speak, various strains to the highest perfection.
We cannot doubt that from those improved races of antiquity,

SWINE. 379

the present pigs of Italy have descended. It is not, we
think, overstraining the mark, to regard the excellent breeds
of pigs in Italy as the descendants of a long line of ances-
try—of breeds established before Rome fell.’ The Neapoli-
tan is the most celebrated Italian breed, and has been the
source from whence some of the most esteemed English breeds
have been in part derived. They have also been introduced
into the United States, but did not prove sufficiently hardy
for ordinary management. Their flesh is of very superior
quality. Martin’s description of the breed is as follows: ‘The
Neapolitan pig is small, black, almost destitute of bristles,
and remarkable for aptitude to fatten; it is short in the
snout, small in the bone, with sharp erect ears; but it is by no
means hardy, at least in our country, and if the sow happens to
have litters in winter, it will be difficult, should the weather be
severe, to save the young pigs from dying. But as a cross
with some of our breeds, as the Berkshire, the Neapolitan race
is most valuable. The cross-breed exhibits improvement in
form without too great delicacy of constitution; they have a
remarkable tendency to fatten, and though larger and stronger
than the Neapolitan, display all their good qualities. The Essex
breed is much indebted for its excellencies to the Neapolitan
intermixture.’

— ——— =
ee SS —<————

IMPROVED ESSEX.

380 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

“This is one of the most valuable breeds now known. Its
establishment is generally credited to the late Lord Western.
It has, of later years, been extensively known in the hands of
W. Fisher Hobbs, of Mark’s Hall, Essex. It has, perhaps,
carried more prizes at the shows of the Smithfield Club, within
the last ten years, than any other breed. As above mentioned,
it was derived from a cross with the Neapolitan, and inherits
the color of that race,* with more size, finer symmetry, and
much better constitution. Stephens, author of the ‘Book of
the Farm,’ and the ‘Farmer’s Guide,’ says: ‘As to the breed
which shows the greatest disposition to fatten, together with a
due proportion of lean, I never saw one equal to that which
was originated by Lord Western, in Essex. They were
exceedingly gentle, indisposed to travel far, not very prolific,
however, but could attain, if kept on, to a great weight, and so
compact in form and small of bone and offal, that they invari-
ably yielded a greater weight of pork than was judged of be-
fore being slaughtered. The offal was small, and more deli-
cious ham was never cured, than they afforded.’ Martin says:
‘These animals fatten quickly, grow rapidly, and yield very
superior meat. The hogs when fattened, will sometimes weigh
twenty-six or twenty-eight stones, (fourteen pounds,) often
eighteen or twenty,’ equal to two hundred and fifty-two to three
hundred and ninety-two pounds.

“ Colonel Lewis G. Morris, of Fordham, Westchester County,
New York, has made several importations of this breed, some
specimens of which were purchased of W. Fisher Hobbs, and
were of that gentleman’s best stock.

“ Points of a Good Hog.—The points which indicate the
fattening tendency in a hog,are, the head small, with short
snout and dished face; the ear small and thin; the neck short
and thick; the chest broad and capacious;+ the ribs round;
the back straight; the loin broad; the rump long from hips

* Though the entire body of the “‘ Improved Essex” is covered with a pigment
of black, these swine dress handsome, showing as white and fair a skin as the
Suffolk.—Com.

+ The writer is aware that Liebig and some others have held that small chests
were most favorable to the fattening tendency, but common observation does not
support the idea.

POULTRY. 381

backward; the legs straight and tolerably small; the skin soft
and smooth, with thin, fine bristles.

“Tt should be borne in mind, however, that all these points
do not indicate an animal best adapted to every situation.
The thin skin and absence of bristles, though favorable to the
accumulation of fat, when the animal is well sheltered and pro-
tected, do not denote the hardiness which may be necessary
under exposure. If the animal is destined to support himself
in a considerable degree, under the various transitions of
weather, instead of the thin hide and scanty bristles of the
refined varieties, he must be clad in covering which will afford
the requisite protection against the elements, and the tendency
to fatten must, to a certain extent, give way to a habit of
activity and a tendency to muscular fibre. Even in ordinary
farm management, there may be too much regard paid to the
points which denote a tendency to fat only, to the neglect of
those which denote constitution. A proper balance of these
must be kept constantly in view, or the stock which will be
found most profitable, cannot be bred.”

Esen WicuHt, Chairman.

POULTRY.
Remarks by Dr. Eben Wight, of the Norfolk Soctety.

Since public attention in this country has been specially
drawn to the subject of poultry, citizens of the county of Nor-
folk have taken a conspicuous lead in the introduction and pro-
pagation of the most esteemed kinds. This was particularly
evinced at the far-famed exhibitions of poultry held within a
few years at the New England metropolis, where a large pro-
portion of the best specimens in the different classes, hailed
directly from this territory. The new interest in this branch
of husbandry has been chiefly manifested in reference to varie-
ties of the bird to which the term fowl is commonly applied.
One variety of this bird, of oriental origin, has in fact been
regarded with a degree of enthusiasm not inaptly characterized

382 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

as “the Shanghae fever,” most of the importations of the stock
having been derived from the city of Shanghae, in China. Jn-
dividuals desirous of turning this excitement to their pecuniary
advantage, have endeavored to make certain accidental or
trifling differences in this variety, the basis for its division into
distinct breeds. Hence we hear of Cochin-China, Imperial
Chinese, Hong Kong, Hoang Ho, Brahma Pootra, &c., all de-
rived from importations from Shanghae.

As showing the groundlessness of these attempted distinc-
tions, attention is invited to some extracts from a work just
issued in England, entitled “The Poultry Book: comprising
the Characteristics, Management, Breeding, and Medical Treat-
ment of Poultry; being the results of personal observation and
practice of the best breeders, including Captain W. W. Hornby,
R. N.; Edward Bond, Esq.; Thomas Sturgeon, Esq.; and
Charles Punchard, Esq. By Rev. W. Wingfield, Honorary
Secretary of the Cornwall Poultry Society, and G. W. Johnson,
Esq., Honorary Secretary of the Winchester Society for the
Improvement of Poultry.” |

The work commences with a chapter headed “History and
Description of the Shanghae Fowl,” as follows :-—

“There is a doubt, which had better be removed from the
very threshold, usually conveyed in the question— Are Cochin- »
China and Shanghae fowls the same?’ We have always enter-
tained the opinion that they are; and as we have invariably
found that fowls imported from China into this country, whether
feathered-legzed or plain-legzed, whether dark-plumaged or
light-plumaged, came hither, directly or indirectly, either from
Shanghae or its vicinity, we have long since concluded that
‘Cochin-China’ is a name altogether misapplied to this variety.
This conclusion amounts to conviction, since we have received
a letter from Mr. Robert Fortune, who has passed so many
years in various parts of China, in which he says: ‘The man
who first gave these fowls the name of Cochin-China has much
to answer for. I firmly believe that what are called Cochin-
Chinas and Shanghaes, are one and the same. One thing is
certain,—the breed you have in this country as Cochin-China,
are plentiful about Shanghae. They were discovered there
after the war, and were frequently brought to this country, and

POULTRY. 383

taken to India by captains of trading vessels. Was not this the
date of their introduction into England? And what grounds
has any one for supposing the fowls ever saw Cochin-China ?
We thought that this variety might have been earlier known,
owing to our long-established commerce with Macao and Can-
ton, but Mr. Fortune says that this breed is but little known
in those warmer parts of China, and that in fact, the southern
Chinese were as much struck with the size of the breed as we
were.’ He adds: ‘The Shanghae breed seems to be more
common about Shanghae, than anywhere else in the north, but
I have found it over all the low country of that part of China.
The southern breeds have been long well known to ship cap-
tains and Enelish residents; but there is nothing very marked
in their character.’

“We have already stated that we do not believe there are
any grounds for the belief that this variety ever saw Cochin-
China; and we think, with Mr. Fortune, (for his question is
indicative as well as inquisitive,) that they were introduced
into this country soon after the more northern parts of ‘the
Celestial Empire,’ such as Shanghae, were thrown open to our
traders, at the conclusion of the Chinese war, in 1843. At the
poultry show held at the Zodlogical Gardens, in the May of
1845, there were prizes especially devoted to ‘Malays and
other Asiatic breeds;’ but these brought to the exhibition no
other oriental variety than the Malays. In fact, we never met
with any published notice of the Shanghae fowls until 1846,
and we shall be near the truth if we assign 1845 as the year
they were first imported. It was in that year that Her Maj-
esty received specimens of them which she exhibited at the
Show of the Royal Dublin Agricultural Society, in the April of
1846.”

The conclusion respecting the date of the introduction of the
Queen’s fowls, as expressed in the above paragraph, is errone-
ous. In the autumn of 18438, the London T%mes noticed them
as being then in “ Her Majesty’s aviary at Windsor.” It was
stated that there were “seven Cochin-China fowls, five hens
and two cocks imported direct from Asia.” That they came
from “Asia,” there is no doubt, but the propriety of calling
them “ Cochin-China fowls,’ does not appear. The Tvmes

384 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

goes on to describe the fowls, and makes a strange blunder by
confounding them with the Fire-backed Pheasant of China.*
The importation alluded to is worthy of note, as constituting
the original leaven which has since leavened the whole lump of
admirers of that kind of fowl in England and America.

Many readers will recollect that one of the distinctions
which in this country has been claimed between the so-called
Cochin-China and Shanghae fowls, was that the former were
destitute of feathers on the legs, while the latter, were said to
be feathered to the toes. But every one who has seen many
fowls imported from Shanghae, knows that there can be no
foundation for this claim, as both feathered and unfeathered
legs are often found in the fowls obtained at that place. The
name of Cochin-China has, however, been given to fowls in
some instances, without even the pretence of this distinction
to justify it. One of the first importations of the Shanghaes
to this country,—that of Dr. Baylies, of Taunton,—were called
Cochin-Chinas by a notorious person who subsequently ob-
tained the stock, although he was expressly told by Dr. Baylies
that the fowls came from Shanghae!

We recur again to the work before us :—

“Having thus traced out the date of the introduction and
the place whence derived, let us next inquire something of the
characteristics and treatment of the birds as they occur at
Shanghae itself; and here Mr. Fortune again comes to our aid.
In the letter already quoted, he says: ‘The Shanghae breed
occurs both with feathered and unfeathered legs, but more fre-
quently unfeathered. The most admired kinds there, are the
game [i. e., partridge or pheasant] colored ones. Many of
them are [colored] much like the pheasant of the country.
However, I am safe in saying that the Chinese do not attach so
much importance as we do to purity of color; large size and
large eggs are what they most admire and prize.’

“Tt being certain that the true Shanghae fowl is met within
its native district with plain legs, even more frequently than
witb legs feathered, or booted, as it is technically termed, the
point often disputed is now settled, as to whether this is any

* See Albany Cultivator for 1844, p. 43.

POULTRY. 385

demonstration of a distinct breed. Henceforth it must be held
to be a mere matter of taste. rite

“Mr. Fortune’s testimony settles another disputed point. It
is very evident that, except as a matter of taste, the light
colored should have no preéminence over the darker plumaged ;
and those societies have acted judiciously which have given
separate prizes of equal value to all the subvarieties of color.
It is judicious, because it is needlessly placing a judge in a
very perplexing position to call upon him to decide upon speci-
mens of equal merit in all important points, but differing in
color.”

The work then speaks of the black, white, gray, (or so-called
“Brahma Pootra,”’) buff, cinnamon, and partridge or grouse-
colored Shanghaes as subvarieties of one breed. In regard
to the “Brahma Pootras,’ specimens of which, introduced
from this country, are known to the authors,—their “history ”
is summed up by an expression of the opinion “ that it will not
prove a distinct breed, but either a variety of the Shanghae
family, or the result of a cross between those birds and the
Malay.” This is just what they are known to be in this coun-
try. Some of them came from Shanghae, and some are a cross
of these and the “ Chittagong,” a term which, as used by Ene-
lish authors on poultry, is only a synonym of Malay. Hence
they were at first, and still are in many places, merely called
“ Chittagongs.”

In reference to names of fowls, there is another matter which
it is well to notice in this connection. In the United States,
the term Hamburg is often applied to fowls with crests or top-
knots. Late English writers do not use the term. According
to the classification adopted by the work above noticed, and
which prevails with the British poultry societies, all top-
knots are placed under the head of Poland fowls, and are
subdivided according to coloring and certain minor distinctions
—as White Polands; Black Polands with white tops; Silver
Polands, (those having a silvery-white ground color;) Golden
Polands, (having a yellow ground color,) with other classes for
such as have beards and muffs.

Hamburg fowls, on the other hand, have no top-knots.
Under this head are placed, what in this country are called

49*

386 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

Bolton Grays, Creoles, &c. The Hamburgs are divided into
Silver-spangled Hamburgs and Gold-spangled Hamburgs, and
these two classes are again subdivided into Silver-pencilled
Hamburgs, Golden-pencilled Hamburgs, &c. To avoid confu-
sion, it is proper that our amateurs should conform to this
classification.

The foregoing remarks in reference to the misnomers of
fowls ,it is hoped, may tend to correct the misunderstanding
which has prevailed on the subject in this vicinity. Other mat-
ters in reference to poultry have lately been so thoroughly
discussed through the medium of periodicals, poultry books, &e.,
as to require no further notice at this time.

ESSEX.

From the Report of the Committee.

By far the largest portion of the exhibition was composed of
Chittagong, Shanghae, and other large breeds of fowls, which
we are well aware sometimes command enormous prices from
dealers and amateurs. We are of opinion, however, that their
real value to the farmer is very much overestimated; their
superiority in size being counterbalanced by their inferiority
as layers, and the coarseness of their flesh. Dorking, Black
Spanish, or some similar breed, will, we think, be found of
more advantage to all persons who rear them for their legiti-
mate end. |

A. L. Pirrson, Chairman.

MIDDLESEX.

Statement of James A. Barrett.

These fowls I offer as a specimen of a flock of about ninety,
which I kept through the last winter, and the most of the spring.
Since then I have reduced them so that at the present time I
have about thirty-five old hens on hand. Since the first of last
January, they have laid six hundred dozen of eggs. And Ihave
raised about one hundred chickens. I have kept them mostly

POULTRY. 387

on damaged corn, wheat screenings, and such cheap grain.
The rooster has weighed about eleven pounds, and the hens
from seven to eight. The receipts, including the eggs laid,
fowls sold, and chickens on hand, (after making up the number
of ninety with which I began the year,) &c., amount to $155.23.
Cost of keeping and other expenses, $83.30. Net gain, $71.93,
which is about eighty-six and one-third per cent. on the ex-
pense.

The chickens which I offer for premium were most of them
raised from fowls that were two yearsold. I have found that
the chickens are much stronger and less likely to droop and
die, when raised from old fowls than when raised from young
ones. I have raised about one hundred chickens, and kept
them mostly, except when small, on cheap grain. This rooster
weighs about six and three-quarters pounds; the pullets five
pounds. The cost of keeping, $14.77. The fowls sold, and
those on hand, $61.57. Net gain, $46.80. ,

Concorp, October 4, 1853.

Statement of Joseph Hosmer, Jr.

These fowls that I present are a mixture of Shanghae and
Cochin with the gray Dorking and native. They were hatched
about the first of April, having set three hens on the 7th, 8th,
and 10th days of March; they came off as above, with thirty-
two chickens, of which I raised thirty-one. Thirteen pairs I
sold, fourth of July, for $1.25 per pair, $16.25.

I regard the change of the rooster, every year, as indispen-
sable to the raising of healthy fowls, and there will be no
trouble with proper keeping in raising chickens and having
good laying hens from any breed.

Concorp, October 4, 1853.

FRANKLIN.
Statement of William A. Howland.

I commenced the present year with fifty hens and four cocks,
the same number as last year. As the committee last year
reported that they thought my hens were too large to be as

388 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

profitable as smaller ones, I have this year, by way of experi-
ment, procured several smaller kinds. I now present you with
eight distinct varieties, viz.: White Shanghaes, Dorkings, Black
Spanish, Poland, Plymouth Rock, Bolton Grays, Bantams, and
last, but not least, a cross between different breeds, of a good
size.

I am satisfied that my largest kinds are the most profitable.
They not only lay younger, but larger eges and more in number.
When dressed, their flesh is yellow, rich, and good flavored;
and for the table, they are not surpassed by any thing that
wears feathers. The fifty hens have laid 4,569 eggs since the
1st of last January, and raised 110 chickens. As it is difficult,
among so many, to know how many each hen lays, I have se-
lected but two, one of which has laid 176 eggs within a year,
hatched and reared one brood of chickens. The other, a white
Shanghae, has laid 131 eggs and raised one brood of chickens
since January Ist. I sell my eggs at an average of about fif-
teen cents per dozen. Some choice ones at one dollar per
dozen. Last year I sold my chickens, for market, at from ten
to twelve and a half cents per pound; average weight, about
four pounds; some selected ones, at one dollar each, when
alive.

I keep the largest part of my fowls in a yard, with a good
shelter, and a supply of food and water. I feed them with corn
meal mixed with water, corn, oats, boiled potatoes, meat, burnt
bones and grass, in summer, and rowen hay in the winter.
When they are confined from insects, they should have a supply
of meat as often as once a week. The cost of keeping, this
year, I should judge has been about two mills per day, each.

Conway, 1853.

BERKSHIRE.
From the Report of the Committee.

The committee to whom was confided the important duty of
making the proper comparative estimate of the various species
of poultry on exhibition, respectfully report, that the number,
variety, and excellence of the several lots of poultry offered

POULTRY. 389

for examination, in a very great degree, exceed those of former
years.

Some of the varieties imported within a few years past ap-
pear to have received an unusual degree of attention from citi-
zens in various parts of the county. The species of larger
fowls that have been presented for examination were very
much admired as well by the committee as by the citizens in
attendance. The stately Shanghae, the graceful Dorking, the
fair proportion of the Chittagong, all showed that, foreign fowls
as well as foreign fashions, have been received and cultivated
with a very considerable degree of extended popular favor.

J. C. Woucort, Chairman.

NORFOLK.

From the Report of the Committee.

There were no natives, if we except some geese and turkeys.
This should not be. The conditions upon which premiums
are offered should positively require statements showing the
expenses and income for at least twelve months previous to
their being offered. Then the number of premiums should be
reduced at least one-half. At the same time the amount should
be no less than now offered. The premiums should be offered
for the most profitable fowls without regard to breeds. We
have had experience to show that poultry and eggs can be pro
duced at a handsome profit; no part of the State can be more
favorable for this business than Norfolk County. We have nu-
merous breeds of fowls from which a good selection might be
made; then grain may be raised as cheap as in other counties,
and the market is as convenient as we could desire. As popu-
lation increases, so the price of eggs and poultry increases.
Our towns are fast filling up with inhabitants. It is desirable
that this branch of business should keep pace with the popula-
tion, as it will affect both producer and consumer favorably.

R. MANSFIELD, Chairman.

390 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

”

BEES AND HONEY.

HAMPSHIRE.

Report of the Committee.

The exhibition of honey, this year, indicates that more in-
terest is felt in this subject than formerly. The productions
of the honey bee are beginning to be appreciated, both as a
source of pleasure and of profit. To make bees profitable, the
keeper must study their habits and consult their tastes. The
times have changed since a swarm of bees found a home in the
carcass of a lion. In our day, neatness and order are essential
to the prosperity of bees. The hives should be well ventilated.
For the purposes of ventilation, ease of management, and con-
venient removal of honey at the pleasure of the keeper, the
hive patented by Phelps, of Ohio, and exhibited at the Fair,
this year, is one of the best ever invented. The best book on
bees is that of Mr. Langstroth, of Greenfield, whose apiary is
worthy of admiration and examination.

Davip S. Cowes, Chairman.

FRANKLIN.

Report of the Committee.

Your committee on bees and honey feel gratified in having
assigned to them for consideration the very sweetest of your
departmental subjects. All that is wanting to do justice to
this matter is a “honeyed tongue,” and a pen dipped in the
“ Balm of a Thousand Flowers.”

From time immemorial the bee has attracted the attention
of man. Its nectar sweetened the verse of the earliest poets,
while it tickled their palates, so that the insect may be fairly
said to occupy a niche in the classical pantheon. The pages
of Holy Writ, also, contain allusions, very fine and very apt, to
the habits and disposition of the bee. Says David, when speak-
ing of his foes: “They compassed me about like bees;” a
striking simile of a chieftain in the hum of battle, singled out

BEES AND HONEY. 391

and beset on all sides by furious foes. “They chased you as
bees do,” said Moses to his charge, “on this side of Jordan,”
when speaking of the Amorites, and the general diabolism of
the children of Israel. And Moses used the very best similitude
possible; for what will give more effectual chase than a posse
of enraged bees? It is verily true that,

He who'll face the vollied round,
They’ll put to flight.

For ages, too, has the bee attracted the attention of man, for
the purpose of domestication and profit. Various have been
the methods pursued, and multiform the contrivances for hiving
and sheltering these insects, from the primitive sections of
hollow trees down to the ne plus ultra bee-home of Langstroth.
This gentleman, who, like many other scientific men, of both
hemispheres, has made the bee the subject of careful study and
observance for a series of years, has given of late to the world
the book of his experience, and the hive of corresponding
fitness ; both of which will be hailed with delight by the apiarian
and all searchers into nature’s arcana, generally. His hive,
under proper management, renders a swarm of bees literally a
“thing to play with,’ as was once remarked to us by a bee-
master who was showing off his aptness about an old fashioned
hive, but who, unfortunately, was the next instant horribly
stung by one of his playthings, which very pointedly enforced a
mind-your-own-business lesson, and left the meddler to his own
pungent and stinging reflections.

The “untutored Indian” knows the bee as the precursor of
civilization—the forerunner of the white man. When, in his
natural solitude, the red man sees the little winged honey-seeker
journeying upon his prairies from flower to flower, and hears
its industrious hum amidst the arches of his forest depths, he
says with a sigh: The white man will soon be here with his
plough and axe; this prairie will be under the dominion of the
one implement; this forest will fall before the other; hunting
is done, the white man is coming !

Small and insignificant as our subject may appear to the
unobserving, it is, to the close observer of nature, to the pro-
found thinker, to the philosopher, a theme of import and conse-

392 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

~*

quence. Inferior creations may teach man, the chief work of
God on earth, many useful lessons, and give to him hints for
profitable adductions. Does a geometrician wish for a cellular
plan giving the most space with the least waste of room and
constructing material, let him examine a simple honey-comb.
Does he wish to alter his governmental constitution, let him
think of the success attendant upon the unchanging law of the
hive. Does aman lack order and system in the management
of his affairs, let him buy Langstroth’s book and see the syste-
matic instinct of the bee. Is he wanting in industry and
energetic action, let him look at a bee-hive. Has he that awful
human failing, minding of business other than his own, let him
look in the same direction and be instructed.

The culture of bees is easy, and may be made profitable.
There is honey around the homes in Franklin, sprinkled upon
her hills and vales, forests and flowers, and only accessible to
this wondrous insect. Honey is also plentiful within these
homes, just as sweet, and appreciated by the tasteful; but we
want both kinds. Again, the apiary forms one of the most
pleasant features of rural life. Many a country-bred dweller
in the pent-up city can look back with a tear of pleasure to the
door-yard of his native cottage; the verdant turf, the pleasant
voices of playing children, the carroling birds, the hums of the
bee-hives, and the eager excitement attendant upon the “swarm-
ing” on some balm-breathing day of June.

In view of all these things, and without further lengthening
of their report, your committee respectfully tender to their
brother apiarians and fellow-coadjutors of this association the |
following little swarm of B’s, which, if properly hived, may
work profit for their keeper :—

Be honest, Be useful, Be steady ;
Beware of Bad Beings and things;
Be ever By industry ready,—
Bread, Beef, Bees, and Bounty it Brings.

Your committee cheerfully recommend the highest gratuity—
one dollar—to Mr. Langstroth, upon the hive exhibited to
them; and only regret that they are limited in their award.

Josian D. Canninc, Chairman.

THE DAIRY. 393

Statement of Asahel Wright.

Statement of the profit of bees kept by Asahel Wricht, of |
Deerfield, one of the committee.
I commenced with three swarms, April, 1844.
Dr.

April 9, 1844, to three swarms bees, . . $21 00
For boxes, hives, and all other expenses, . 39 04

$60 04
Cr.
Sold from the above three swarms, . » $102 05
To nine stocks onhand, , ; : ai, a0 00
138 05
$78 OL

THE DAIRY,

_ ESSEX,

From the Report of the Committee.

There were eight entries of butter submitted to their inspee-
tion. One failed in quantity, to comply with the society’s regu-
lations. To the remaining seven parcels, the committee gave
the most patient inspection, and applied all the various tests
at their command.

There were two parcels of cheese entered, which in the
opinion of the committee were not of that “decidedly supe-
rior quality,” which the rules of the society require to entitle
either parcel to a premium. The committee would suggest the
inquiry, whether the interest of an improved and progressive
agriculture like that of Essex County, is to be further advanced
by the present system of premiums for the dairy. Encircled
as is our county by a number of prosperous cities, and filling
up, as are all our towns, with a busy and thriving population,
denser than any other of equal extent in the United States—
can we, by any premiums which this society may offer, induce

50*

894 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

our farmers, with the present and rapidly increasing demand
- for milk, to go extensively into the production of butter and
cheese? Your committee think not; and that the time has
come for a revision of your dairy premiums. .

For the Committee,

Ricuarp P. Waters, Chairman.

Statement of Jonathan Berry.

I present for your inspection a box of butter containing six-
teen pounds, being a sample of 620 pounds and 435 quarts of
-milk, equal to fifty pounds of butter, making 670 pounds of
_ butter made from seven cows, between the 20th May, and 25th
.of September. The cows have been kept upon a common

pasture, with corn fodder daily, and bone-dust once a week, the
latter part of the season.

Process of Making.—The milk is strained into tin pans
and set ina cool cellar, where it remains from thirty-six to
forty-eight hours, according to the weather, care being taken to
take off the cream while the milk is sweet. The cream is put
into & vault made in the bottom of the cellar for that purpose.
We churn once a week. After it is churned the buttermilk is
-thoroughly worked out, the butter is salted with about one
ounce of salt to the pound, and the next day weighed out for
market.

Mippteton, September 27, 1853.

Statement of Charles P. Preston.

I present for examination, a pot of June, and also a box of
September butter, samples of eight hundred and twenty-eight
pounds made during the four months next following May 20th,
of the present year, the dairy averaging nine cows.

The milk is strained into tin pans and placed in the cellar
where it remains from thirty-six to forty-eight hours, when it
is skimmed, and the cream placed in a vault, made for the
purpose, until churning, which is done once a week.

The butter is worked by hand until the buttermilk is com-

THE DAIRY. 395 |

pletely worked out, and salted with from three-fourths to one
ounce of salt to the pound.

The cows have common pasture till August 10th, when they
are fed by an addition of corn fodder.

Norru Danvers, September 27, 1853.

MIDDLESEX.

Statement of Hlijah M. Read.

I present for your inspection one box of new churned butter,
made from the milk of my Alderney cow. The cream was
gathered from the 21st to the 30th of September.

Process of Making.—The milk is strained into tin pans,
about one-half of which is set over a kettle of hot water and
brought up to about one hundred and twenty degrees of heat
by the thermometer ;—it is all set in a cool place and allowed
to stand from thirty-six to forty-eight hours, when the cream
is taken off and put into a tin pail and stirred daily. After it
was churned, the buttermilk was worked out by hand, and
salted to the taste. After standing thirty-six hours, it was
worked over the second time.

Trewkspury, October 4, 1853.

Statement of John F'. Rice.

The process of making this butter, varies but little from
what I have stated to the committee on former occasions.

The milk was strained into tin pans, standing in an upper
room for about thirty-six hours; the cream was then taken from
the milk and put into tin pails and placed near by, or on ice,
to preserve the right temperature. The cream is from four
days’ milk of a dairy of ten cows, that have had no extra feed
whatever.

This butter was churned in one of Parker & White’s crank
churns, until well come, then rinsed in cold water, taken from
the churn and salted, one ounce to the pound.

After remaining about twelve hours, it was worked into
pound lumps and prepared in the manner here presented.

Maruporoven, October 4, 1853.

396. MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

Statement of William F. Barnard.

The lot of butter which I offer for your inspection, is from
one week’s cream of a dairy of seven cows, and was made in
the following manner. The milk was strained into tin pans
and set on shelves in the milk-room, properly ventilated by a
window which is kept open most of the time, screened by a
blind on the outside; after standing from thirty-six to forty-
eight hours, according to the temperature of the weather, the
cream is then taken off and put into tin pails and kept in the
same room till churned. The buttermilk is then drawn off, the
butter taken out and worked over, and salted in proportion of
about one ounce to the pound. I never use water in rinsing
the butter, or ice in the cream. After remaining about twelve
hours, the butter is again worked over and weighed into pound
lumps, and prepared for the box by the use of the hand and
thin pieces of hard wood, such as are oe by dairy women in
shaping the lumps.

Marrsorovuau, October 4, 1853.

Statement of Daniel L. Giles.

The box of new churned butter which I present for your
inspection, is a specimen of six hundred and forty pounds,
made since the 9th of June last from a dairy of eight cows.

The average quantity per week, was forty pounds.

The cows have had common pasture until the middle -of
August, since then, fed with corn fodder.

Process of Making.—The wilk is strained into tin pans, and
stands in a cool chamber from thirty-six to forty-eight hours, |
when the cream is taken off and put into a large cooler, and
stirred daily, until churned.

We churn twice and three times a week. After churning,
the buttermilk is thoroughly worked out with the hands, and
the butter salted to the taste. After standing twelve hours,
it is again worked and weighed, each pound separately.

Lixcotn, October 3, 1853.

THE DAIRY. 397

HAMPSHIRE.

Report of the Committee.

Buitter.—The display of butter at the last Hampshire Agri-
cultural Fair was the finest ever seen in the Connecticut Valley.
There were thirty-eight entries, making an aggregate of four
hundred and ten pounds. The committee were fully con-
vinced, immediately after commencing their labor, of the diffi-
cult duty they had to perform, viz.: to select eight parcels,
deemed the best, for which the society had offered as many
different premiums, the highest being four dollars, and the low-
est fifty cents. The committee spent nearly half a day in
tasting and re-tasting, comparing and re-comparing, in order to
do justice, according to their best judgment, to all the competi-
tors who had complied with the rules of the society. Where
all was so nice, it was no easy matter to do justice to all, with
the limited number of premiums to be awarded.

Instead of publishing the statements furnished by the com-
petitors and exhibitors, the chairman of the committee decided
that it would be more acceptable to butter-makers and mem-
bers of the society generally, to have some facts and sugges-
tions presented—such as experience and observation have
developed and recorded.

First, then, as to cows. The different breeders and dealers
in stock are far from being agreed as to which variety of all
is the best. Some prefer the Durham cow, others the York-
shire, the Devon, the Ayrshire, the Staffordshire, the Kerry, of
Ireland, and the Alderney. The latter is universally admitted
to produce the richest milk in quality. The Alderneys, or im-
proved Gurnseys, have been known to give twenty-six quarts of
milk apiece, per day; the cream of which has produced four-
teen pounds of butter per week.

A full bred Durham has been known to produce twenty-eight
quarts a day, and eighteen pounds and six ounces of butter per
week. <A test was made at Liverpool, a few years since, of the
qualities of milk, with the following results :—

Yorkshire and common cows, eight per cent. of cream;

398 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

Ayrshire, fifteen per cent.; Alderney, twenty-three and one-
half per cent.

There are some who prefer the native cow, because more
easily kept. Much depends, however, upon the treatment of
the animal. If the keeping be poor, the less one has to do
with fancy stock, the better. If it be good, then will native
stock soon become fancy, or highly improved stock. Much
might be said on this subject, but the want of space forbids
further remark.

Secondly. With regard to keeping, or the effect which pas-
turage has upon the quality of butter. It is a common remark
that certain localities produce better butter than others. Much
less, however it is thought, depends upon pasturage than upon
the dairy-maid. In every district, says Dr. Anderson, an
English agricultural writer, where good butter is made, it is
universally attributed to the richness of the pastures, though it
is a well-known fact, that, take a skilful dairy-maid, from that
district into another, where no good butter is made, and where,
of course, the pastures are deemed very unfavorable, she will
make good butter, as good as she used to do; and bring one
from the last district into the other, and she will find that she
cannot make better butter there than she did before, unless
she takes lessons from the servants or others whom she finds
there. I have frequently, says he, known instances of this
kind.

M. Tessier of the French National Institute, remarks, that
the particular quality of Bretagne butter, whose color, flavor,
and consistence are so much prized, depends neither on the
pasture nor the particular variety of cow, but on the mode
of making. This butter is of a superior quality, because they*
make it of the richest cream, and in large quantities at a time.
As soon as it is made and washed, they sprinkle it with sweet
milk, spread it out in flatted cakes, larger or smaller, but rarely
containing less than six pounds, and lay it ona kind of pan
placed on hot cinders, and covered with a copper lid, on which:
are put cinders, also. It remains there some minutes, more
or less, according to the bulk of the cakes. This mode re-
quires skill and practice, in order to succeed.

Thirdly. With regard to the care and treatment of cows.

THE DAIRY. 399

They should be kept clean—washed, if need be,.and curried.
The following statement is copied from one in Ireland, who
stated that he had an actual profit of £331 6s., on keeping a
-single cow, in house, eight years—during which time she yielded
.38,855 quarts of milk. In the summer he fed his cow on
clover, rye-grass, lucerne, and carrots, four times a day, feeding
at noon about four gallons of grains and two of bran, mixed—
-giving her no more than she would eat up cleanly. The feed
‘in the winter was the same; feeding five or six times a day;
supplied her with food while milking; keeping the manger clean ;
never tied her; being particularly careful to milk her cleanly
—tmilch cows being often spoiled for want of patience in the
milker. This neglect frequently causes suppuration and blind-
ness in the teats—the want of milk. The result of one year,
the cow then being eleven years old, is here detailed: She
ealyed on the 3d of April, and on the 5th of June, the calves
—twins—being nine weeks old, were sold for £12 12s. From
the 6th of June to the 3d of July, four weeks, she gave twenty-
four quarts, daily, equal to six hundred and seventy-two
quarts, yielding seventeen pounds of butter per week, or
sixty-eight pounds per month. From the 4th of July, to the
18th of September, eleven weeks, she gave twenty-two quarts,
daily, equal to sixteen hundred and ninety-four quarts, yielding
sixteen pounds of butter per week, or one hundred and seyenty-
‘six pounds for the whole time. From the 19th of September
to the 13th of November, eight weeks, she gave eighteen
quarts, daily, equal to one thousand and eight quarts, yielding
fourteen pounds of butter per week, equal to one hundred and
twelve pounds, &e. Total, forty-eight weeks, averaging about
fourteen quarts per day, equalling five thousand three hundred
and sixty quarts, yielding five hundred and ninety-four pounds
of butter. This, at twenty cents a pound, would equal one
hundred and eighteen dollars, eighty cents. The rent of a
cow, per year, in Ireland and Scotland varies from seven to
twelve pounds sterling.

Lastly. The dairy-room. This should be of equable tem-
perature, say about forty-five degrees—with a northern expo-
sure—well ventilated—no inside communication with any other
building—free from smoke—and perfectly clean. So of every

400 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

utensil used. Cast-iron pans, tinned on the inside, are the best
coolers; these, and the pails, &c., should all be exposed daily
to the sun. Milk but twice a day, and be sure that you strip
perfectly clean. Allow no harsh, rough, cross-grained milker
to approach your cows any sooner than you would a slut or
snuff-taker to enter the dairy room. With regard to churning,
the cream should be of the temperature of about fifty-three
degrees. This is declared to be the very best temperature for
churning, if you would make butter of the finest quality. If
you desire to obtain the greatest quantity, churn at fifty-six
degrees. When the churning is done, place the butter in pure
cold spring water, with some salt in it, preparatory to freeing
it from every particle of milk. Butter should be salted at the
rate of about one pound of the finest and purest salt that can
be obtained to every fourteen pounds of butter.

The process of obtaining the cream to an extent hitherto
unattainable, has been effected by Mr. Carter, an Englishman,
who details his experiment, in a paper presented to the Society
of Arts, as follows :— y

“ A peculiar process of extracting cream from milk, by which
a superior richness is produced in the cream, has long been
known and practised in Devonshire; this produce of the dairies
of that county being well known to every one, by the name of
‘clotted’ or ‘clouted cream.’ As there is no peculiarity in the
milk from which this fluid is extracted, it has been frequently a
matter of surprise that the process has not been adopted in
other places of the kingdom. A four-sided vessel is formed of
zinc plates, twelve inches long, eight inches wide, and six
inches deep, with a false bottom at one-half of the depth. The
only communication with the lower compartment is by the lip,
through which it may be filled or emptied. Having first placed
at the bottom of the upper compartment a plate of perforated
zinc, the area of which is equal to that of the false bottom, a
gallon (or any given quantity) of milk is poured (immediately
when drawn from the cow) into it, and must remain there at
rest for twelve hours; an equal quantity of boiling water must
then be poured into the lower compartment through the lip; it
is then permitted to stand twelve hours more, (i. e. twenty-four
hours altogether,) when the cream will be found perfect, and

THE DAIRY. 401

of such consistence that the whole may be lifted off with the
finger and thumb. It is, however, more effectually removed by
gently raising the plate of perforated zinc from the bottom, by
the ringed handles, by which means the whole of the cream is
lifted off in a sheet, without remixing any part with the milk
below. With this apparatus I have instituted a series of ex-
periments, and as a mean of twelve successive ones, I obtained
the following results: four gallons of milk, treated as above,
produced, in twenty-four hours, four and one-half pints of clotted
eream, which, after churning only fifteen minutes, gave forty,
ounces of butter; four gallons of milk, treated in the common
mode in earthen-ware pans, and standing forty-eight hours, pro-
duced four pints of cream, which, after churning nineteen
minutes, gave thirty-six ounces of butter. The increase in
the quantity of cream, therefore, is twelve and one-half per
cent., and of butter upwards of eleven per cent. The experi-
mental farmer will instantly perceive the advantages accruing
from its adoption, and probably his attention to the subject may !
produce greater results. I shall feel richly rewarded if, by
exciting an interest on the subject, 1 can produce any, the
slightest improvement, in the quality or mode of producing an
article which may properly be deemed one of the necessaries

of life.”
L. WETHERELL, Chairman.

Report of the Committee on Cheese.

That your committee might be better qualified to discharge
the duty assigned them, they were led to a brief examination
of the article of cheese.

1. Etymologically. They found the occurrence of the word:
“cheese,” in at least eleven different languages. They found,.
moreover, that the primary signification of the term is to curdle
or congeal, from collecting, drawing, or driving. Cheese,.
therefore, is the more thick or coagulable part of milk, called
curd, separated from the more thin or watery part, called whey,
by a process of which the sequel will speak, and pressed into a
hoop or mould.

2. We looked into the subject, historically. And we found:
that cheese is “nothing new under the sun;” that it has a his-

51*

402 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

tory, and a history, too, that carries us back to the days when
the world was young. David, the son of Jesse, carried ten
cheeses to the captain of his brethren, when he, a mere strip-
ling, went out, single-handed, to fight the great Philistine, and
lay his pride in the dust. More than three thousand years ago,
Job said: “Hast thou not poured me out like milk, and curdled
me like cheese ?”— indicating, thus, his knowledge of the article
as then existing. Frequent mention is also made of it in old
Latin authors. In coming to their work, your committee felt,
therefore, that they had to do with that which is venerable in-
deed, having descended to us from generations far away and
buried, and through the lapse of centuries long gone, and they
tried to feel something of the reverence that became them in
the presence of the survivor of so many buried generations
and centuries.

3. We made inquiry into the chemistry of cheese. In answer
to our inquiries, our most worthy friend, “The Progressive
Farmer,’ gave us all needed information, as he has done on
most other matters connected with “practical agriculture.”
We learned from him that about four per cent. of milk is sugar ;
that if the milk be kept for some time in a warm place, its
coaculable part acts upon the sugar, and changes some portion
of it into what is termed lactic acid, and that the soda, which
is one of the substances contained in milk, and whose office it
is to hold the curd in solution, is acted upon by the acid above
mentioned, so that its alkaline power is neutralized, whereupon
the curd immediately appears in the form of curdled milk,
which, when pressed, forms a kind of cheese. As this process
of cheese-making would, however, be slow and inconvenient,
and, withal, would not secure cheese of a good quality, it is
common to make use of some other acid than that generated
in the milk, in order to neutralize the soda, and destroy its
power. For this purpose, an animal acid is used, called rennet,
This is taken from the stomach of the sucking calf, where its
office is the same as that to which the cheese-maker puts it,
viz., to curdle the milk taken from the cow. The milk thus
curdled is more digestible. For any further information, we
refer to our friend, the “ Farmer,” of whom, we trust, all other

THE DAIRY. - 403

farmers and farmers’ wives will be constant and diligent
learners.

4. We proceeded to our work, experimentally. While en-
gaged in this part of our examination, we could but recall the
old proverb, so often quoted, “de gustibus non disputandum
est,” which is, being interpreted, “ there is no accounting for the
tastes.”

GrorcE E. FisHer, Chairman.

HAMPDEN.

From the Report of the Committee on Butter.

Your committee would say of the butter offered, that it was
very good, yet much of it lacked that firmness and dryness es-
sential to excellence. In view of the vast importance of the
article, and of the great proportion of second and third quality
that often comes to our markets, they wish to add a few words
in favor of great care in the management of dairies. Too
much can hardly be said in favor of extreme carefulness; the
good dairy-woman should no more suffer milk or cream to
be slopped about her dairy-room, than upon her best carpet.
The dairy-room should be well ventilated, the atmosphere cool,
dry, and free from the taint of any sour or decomposing sub-
stance. To attain perfection in the article of butter, there
must be a good selection of the stock, which should be fed in
rather dry and sweet pastures, great care and thorough clean-
liness in the management; the cream to be churned as often as
twice a week in warm weather, the buttermilk thoroughly
worked out without so much handling as to make the butter
soft and greasy, for it should have the firmness and dryness
of wax, rather than the consistency of lard; the salt used for
seasoning should be of the best quality and thoroughly incor-
porated. Butter made as above described will keep sweet for
years, and always command a ready sale and good price, while
much that comes to our markets will be unfit for table use ina
week.

R. E. Bemis, Chairman.

404 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

-

From the Report of the Committee on Cheese.

The committee on cheese report that there were but two
entries of cheese, both of which were worthy of high praise.
The manufacture of cheese is not a prominent article among
the dairy products of Hampden; the rapidly increasing demand
for the milk and butter, for the supply of our home market at
more remunerating prices, has manifestly reduced the agere-
gate of cheese from former years; the samples on exhibition
gave satisfactory evidence that the modus operandi of making
an article every way worthy of the premiums offered by the
society, had not been laid upon the shelf; it may be considered
a question of some importance whether the great number of pre-
miums offered upon butter and cheese has the effect desired and
aimed at by the society. No one, offering a good article of
either, would sacrifice their credit, as the manufacturer, or
willingly consent to be placed in the sixth degree of excellence.
It is not our duty to suggest a better way; we only commend
the subject for consideration. 4

H. E. Mosety, Chairman.

BRANKLIN.

From the Report of the Committee on Butter.

Butter, from long and common use may justly be considered one
of the necessaries of life; and any improvement in its richness
or purity, adds to the health and comfort of our great family.

Twenty specimens of the article have been submitted to your
committee for inspection, most of which bear evidence of com-
mendable skill and taste in manufacture.

In deciding upon the relative claims of the various competi-
tors for the society’s premiums, your committee have felt a
degree of diffidence in making the selections, on account of
the equality of many of the samples. Then, in deciding upon
the qualities of such an article that one calls prime, another
might, with as much propriety, call second, so our decision
must necessarily be somewhat arbitrary.

THE DAIRY. 405

Statement of Mrs. Rosanna Martindale.

Set the milk in tin pans, let it stand till sour, then remove
the cream and place it in a refrigerator till ready to churn,
then add the juice of three or four carrots; after churning, work
well three times.

Statement of Mrs. A. De Wolf.

In warm weather the milk stands about twenty-four hours;
in cool weather from thirty-six to forty-eight hours. In warm
weather churn once in a week; in cool weather once in two
weeks. The cream is kept in a cool place in tin. In warm
weather it is hung in the well the night previous to churning.
All the milk is taken out, the butter is then weighed, and one
ounce of salt added to each pound of butter. It is then set in
a cool place till the next day, when it is again worked and
returned to a cool place and excluded from the air, when it is
fit for use. .

Statement of Mrs. George C. Dole.

The milk is strained into pans and set in an airy place, not
allowing it to stand more than thirty-six hours before removing
the cream; it is salted, and stirred frequently, as new is added,
for about four or five days. It is then churned, the butter
separated from the milk and salted; after standing a few hours
it is put into a machine and worked till free from buttermilk.

Statement of Mrs. Moses A. Barnard.

The milk is set in a cool place in tin; stands from thirty-six
to forty-eight hours; then the cream is taken off and kept in a
tin vessel; churn twice a week; the butter is separated with
care from the milk; it is then salted so as to be palatable.
The cows are kept in a common pasture with no extra feed.

_ The owners of the other samples are entitled to the thanks
of the society for the spirit of emulation in the production of
so desirable an article as good butter, as is manifested by them
in the various specimens exhibited.

Epwarp Barton, Chairman.

406 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

-

NORFOLK.

Statement of John H. Robinson.

Herewith I send a statement of the yield of milk from six
of my cows, from the year beginning September 20th, 1852,
ending September 20th, 1853.

Thave selected from my stock such as I intended to keep the
entire year; not, however, so much with reference to their
milking properties at any given time within the year, as with
the view of ascertaining precisely the average yield per day,
through the year, of what may be considered good fair milkers.

Two of them calved in September, 1852; two in December,
and two in January, 1853: so that it will be seen that four
of them have been in milk only for eight or nine months in the
year.

The whole yield has been 16,653 gallons, making an average
for each cow per day, of seven quarts, one pint and one gill.
The greatest average of any one of the six has been nine
quarts and one pint per day; and the smallest average five
quarts and one pint; all measwed by the beer measure,
about the twentieth day of each month, and a memorandum
made by myself of the product of each cow, separately. The
milk was delivered for the Boston market at an average price
of fourteen cents per gallon, at the barn, which would amount
to $582.82, or $97.13 for each cow.

The feed has been, in the winter, the best of English and
salt hay, (half of each) with half a bushel of brewer’s grains
per day a part of the time, or instead of grains, half a peck of
corn and oil meal soaked in water, twelve hours before feeding.
In the summer and fall, no grain, but good pasturage, with a
plenty of green corn fodder. They have received no better
attention than the balance of my stock, all having been fed with
the same quantity and in the same way.

My rule is, when feeding from the barn, to have them fed and
milked about the same time each day: say hay three times,
grain twice, and water three times, the last watering at eight
o’clock in the evening, which I consider very important. In

FRUITS AND VEGETABLES. 407

winter my milch cows are kept for the most of the time in the
barn—often, in very cold weather, for two weeks together.

The cost of keeping, at the present high price of hay and
grain, may, I think, be put down at about $2.25 per week, from
November to June, and the rest of the year at fifty cents;
making the whole cost for the year about $75 per head.

As such a difference of opinion prevails as to the average
yield of milk from a stock of cows, I have ventured to present
somewhat at length the particulars herewith submitted, and if
in the opinion of the committee they are considered of any
importance, they may be disposed of in such way as is judged
best.

DorcueEstTEeR, September 21, 1853.

FRUITS AND VEGETABLES.

ESSEX.

Report of the Committee.

In the exhibition of to-day we were reminded of the great
advance which has been made in this useful department, since
the show in South Danvers in 1835 or ’36, where one of your
committee exhibited native pears from Maine. This was about
the commencement of a regular systematic arrangement of
fruits at our annual shows. The exhibition at this time, not-
withstanding the rain of Tuesday, and the short crop of apples
in our county, was much better than we could have anticipated.
Pears, grapes, and peaches, were, as usual, good. As regards
the last named fruit, it is remarkable that the crop of early
peaches exceeded that of the apple, a circumstance which will
not probably occur again for years at least. There were sixty-
five entries of fruit, from the following places, viz.: Lawrence,
thirteen; Andover, nine; Haverhill, nine; Methuen, fourteen ;
Salem, five; Newburyport, three; Newbury, three; Wenham,
two; Groveland, Georgetown, Beverly, Marblehead, Middleton,

408 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

Topsfield, Boxford, and Amesbury, one each. Charles F. Put-
nam, of Salem, had one hundred and fifty distinct varieties of
apples and pears; Robert Manning, one hundred and twenty-
one of pears; Moses Pettingill, of Topsfield, fifty-four of apples,
pears, and peaches; Ephraim Emerton, of Salem, twenty-nine
of pears; A. D. Rodgers, twenty-five of grapes and pears.
There were fine Black Hamburg and White Sweet Water
grapes, open air culture, from S. H. Elliot, of Lawrence. Of
the native grapes shown, your committee found none superior
to those of last year. Fine Angouleme Pears from David N evins,
of Methuen, and Rev. Dr. Packard, of Lawrence. Superior
“ Bezi de la Motte” pears from Dr. Robinson, of West New-
bury, one cluster of nineteen, grown upon a single stem, weighed
seven pounds. There were fine Hubbardston Nonesuch, an
apple which we cannot too highly recommend for New England
culture, from Charles F. Putnam, of Salem, and 8. H. Brockel-
bank, of Georgetown.

In the cultivation of fruit, particularly the pear, we appre-
hend that a judicious selection of soil and exposure is most im-
portant; many of our fine varieties when produced on a light
sandy loam are poor and almost worthless, while the same sorts,
when grown upon what we denominate a strong, retentive loam,
are large, fully developing their fine character; we therefore
believe that it is now the greatest desideratum in the culture
of the pear, to ascertain what varieties to cultivate on a
given soil.

In the recommendations which have been made from time to
time, of the best varieties of pears for general culture, (irrespec-
tive of soil,) many and great mistakes have arisen. Thus, for
example, the Beurré d’Aremberg, Wilkinson, Lewis, and some
other varieties, will almost invariably disappoint those who
grow them upon a light porous soil. There are, however, some
sorts which, like the Baldwin and Hubbardston Nonesuch apples,
accommodate themselves to various soils. Among these are
the Bartlett, Beurré Bosc and Thompson, early fall fruits, and
the Lawrence and Winter Nelis for winter—these are all first
rate fruits. The Bloodgood, an early pear, and the Belle Lu-
crative, a fall variety, are higher flavored and better developed
upon a light, warm soil. The experimental knowledge con-

FRUITS AND VEGETABLES. 409

cerning the proper soil for the finest pears is of the utmost
importance in the cultivation of this fine fruit.

Joun M. Ives, Chairman.

Report of the Committee on New Fruits.

The only fruits exhibited for the premiums offered by the
society, subject to their awards, were two varieties of grapes
from Mr. James Blood, of Newburyport; that were presented,
as coming within the conditions entitling them to the first and
second prizes, offered for seedlings of this species of fruit.
The premium was, “for a new variety of native or seedling
grape, of decidedly superior quality, ripening in this county in
the open air, by the middle of September, prolific and suitable
for the table.” These grapes were examined on September
12th, by one of your committee, who found them then, as he
states, “ripening in the open air, prolific, &c.” Mr. Blood
represents that these grapes were raised from seeds of a Malaga
raisin, sowed in pots, and transplanted into the open ground—
that they have been in bearing for eight years, and have never,
during that period, failed to produce a crop, he farther says ;
that this year they were fully ripe in the last week in August,
and that consequently when exhibited, they had lost the pecu-
liarly rich and delicate flavor that distinguishes them from
other grapes.

From this, it would seem, that the grapes of Mr. Blood, “if
of decidedly superior quality ”—were justly entitled to the
premium of the society; for certainly those of the character
here represented, would be considered an acquisition to our
somewhat limited stock of grapes suited to out-door culture—
but yet your committee hesitate to make such award.

It is very difficult, and must be dangerous, to form a decided
opinion respecting the quality of any fruit from testing it once
only, and then perhaps but a few specimens, because all fruit
growers know that not only many species, but many varieties
of the same species vary much in quality in different years.
This is especially true of grapes, that seem to be peculiarly
subject to the contingencies of the season, and whose adapta-
tion to general cultivation can only be ascertained by a some-

52*

410 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

what extended experience. These grapes have, it is true, been
proved by Mr. Blood, for several years, but your committee
have seen them but once, and responsible to the society and
the public therefor, they can make their award only upon their
own examination and judgment.

In the Massachusetts Horticultural Society no new seedling
fruit can receive a premium until it has been tested from three
to five years in succession, and the reasons that led to the
adoption of such a rule, apply forcibly to the case now under
consideration. The premium offered by the society is a liberal
one, and its award is a matter of moment, not to the society
and competitor only, but the public, because such award gives
the assurance and pledge of the society, that the fruit, to which
it is made, is worthy of an extended cultivation, a warrant that
should not, as your committee think, be given until authorized
by such repeated examinations as will greatly tend to prevent
the commission of error.

For these reasons, your committee, thinking that they have
not had sufficient opportunities of testing them, to feel certain
that they fully answer the conditions required by the society,
while entertaining a very favorable opinion of their merits,
have refrained from awarding premiums at this time, to Mr.
Blood’s grapes, and recommend to the trustees the withholding
of such, until by further trials their claims shall be more clearly
established.

JOSEPH S. Casot, Chairman.

From the Report of the Committee on Vegetables.

To this committee were assigned those productions of the
vegetable kingdom, not classed among the fruits, as the apple,
pear, quince, peach, plum, grape, &c., or the lovely and beauti-
ful flowers; these were placed under the charge of other com-
mittees.

The collection was very good, exceeding that of any previ-
ous year. It was very promiscuous, including varieties of corn,
squashes, melons, tomatoes, cabbages, celery, onions, potatoes,
beets, &c., some of these are the ripened fruit, some the

FRUITS AND VEGETABLES. 411

pericarp or receptacle of the seed, some the leaf, some the
bleached leaf stalk, some the matured bud, and others the root;
nearly every part of the plant is represented, in one or the
other of the above-named varieties, and is used for culinary
purposes. Various modes of treatment are requisite, to bring
to a high state of perfection the development of that particu-
lar part, for which the respective variety is cultivated. It is
incumbent upon all societies, having for their object the im-
provement of the soil, to diffuse the necessary information, and
to excite a spirit of research and inquiry in the community,
more especially the agricultural portion, respecting this impor-
tant subject.

The number of contributors to this department was fifty-
two, as follows: From Lawrence, nineteen; Methuen, twelve;
Andover, eleven; Danvers, two; Haverhill, Topsfield, Middle-
ton, Lynn, Lynnfield, Beverly, Marblehead, and Salem, one
each.

It will be perceived from the above, that the greatest num-
ber of the contributors were from Lawrence, or its immediate
vicinity—very few from the other sections of the county. The
unpleasant condition of the weather during the first day of the
exhibition, undoubtedly, prevented many, more especially those
residing at a distance, from sending contributions.

Your committee were highly gratified with the fine accom-
modations furnished for the display of the various specimens.
The additional amount placed at their disposal to be awarded
in gratuities, exerted a favorable influence towards increasing
an interest in this department of the exhibition. They recom-
mend that an additional amount be appropriated the next sea.
son, and that the society in future encourage, with a high degree
of liberality, this branch of agriculture, so important to the
interests of this county. They sincerely trust, that in future,
contributions will be received from all sections of the county,.
and not be confined, as it frequently happens, to the immediate
vicinity of the place where the exhibition is held. They re-
spectfully request all. cultivators of the county, to visit the
exhibition the next season, to bring specimens of all their pro-
ducts, and those who cannot attend personally, to send the
same by one of their neighbors. It is not necessary to bring:

412 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

large quantities of any one article, but a small sample of all—
as the varieties of Indian corn, rye, wheat, potatoes, beets,
squashes, &c. &c. The public will then have an opportunity
to form a fair and impartial opinion of what can be raised m
old Essex. This county has materials within herself to make
a grand display. If farmers and amateurs will only make a
little exertion, this object will be accomplished.

H. WHEATLAND, Chairman.

MIDDLESEX.

Report of the Committee.

The show of pears was very fine, and your committee delib-
erated long in making some of the awards, so nearly balanced
were the claims of the competitors. They would gladly have
awarded further premiums to some of the very fine dishes of
pears offered for competition, had it been in their power to do
so; and they desire to make particular mention of the superb
Duchess d’Angouleme, weighing twenty ounces, exhibited by
Mr. Nesmith, of Lowell, which would have received the first pre-
mium for the best single dish if they had been exhibited in
season.

Your committee take this occasion again to recommend the
cultivation of the pear on the quince. Many of our choicest
pears can only be grown to perfection on this stock; and they
are more hardy, more prolific, and come much earlier into
bearing when worked upon the quince than upon their own
roots, and* their dwarf habit of growth adapts them to the
smallest garden; six or eight feet square being sufficient space
for them. They may also be transplanted successfully at
almost any age, by reason of the abundant fibrous roots which
the quince makes near the surface of the ground. Thus the
tenant may take his trees with him as easily as his roses; a
thing impossible when the pear was worked upon its own
roots. '

Perhaps a few hints, drawn from the experience of some of
your committee, in regard to the selection and cultivation of
the pear on the quince, may guide the novice who has hitherto

FRUITS AND VEGETABLES. 413

foreborne their cultivation, in the belief that it was difficult in
itself, and that he would have to wait half a lifetime for his
first fruits.

The best soil for the pear is undoubtedly a stout loam, lean-
ing to clay, but friable, and not wet in the winter, nor liable to
crack in the summer. Such a soil is retentive of moisture and
of manure, and has the property of holding potash with great
tenacity ; a manure which is of great importance to the pear.

If the purchaser is not in haste to see his first fruits, but
desires to have the best formed trees, he will buy them of
rather small size, as the roots will be less likely to be muti-
lated in the transplanting, and the tree will be more easily led
into the shape he desires to give it, whether standard, pyramid,
or espalier; this last form being only necessary against a fence,
or with some very tender kinds. We think the pyramid the
most natural and beautiful form and would recommend our
readers to go to the nurseries of Messrs. Hovey & Co., in
Cambridge, to see the finest specimens of pyramidal training
in the country. The lower branches should be very near the
ground, and the leading shoot should be pruned or pinched
back at such distances as will compel the formation of succes-
sive tiers of branches at proper distances, say twelve to
eighteen inches.

In planting, dig a hole three feet deep and three feet in
diameter. If your soil be light, put into the bottom of the hole
three inches in depth of clay; if it be heavy, put ten or twelve
inches of stones to secure a good drainage. If you have per-
fectly ripe compost, mix it liberally among the earth about the
roots; if your compost is raw, put it in the bottom of the hole
and cover it with earth, and let nothing but the mellow earth
come in contact with the roots. Plant three or four inches
above the level of the ground to allow for the settling of the
earth; press the earth gently after planting, and, if dry weather
ensue, mulch with a little fresh grass; if the earth gets dry,
water at evening, taking care not to water too much, as this
soddens the roots, remembering to keep the ground moist but
not wet.

Bone dust is a very valuable manure for the pear, as is also
ashes; one quart of the former and two quarts of the latter,

414. MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

may be mixed with the surface soil annually, and one pint of
guano dug into the surface to the depth of two or three inches,
in the autumn, will be found greatly to increase the growth
and fruitfulness of the tree; this for trees of five or six feet,
for smaller ones in proportion.

The tree is now planted in soil trenched to the depth of
three feet and the diameter of three feet. As soon as the
roots have extended to the verge of the dug ground, dig a
trench round the tree outside the roots one spade in width and
to the same depth as before, manuring also as before, and re-
peat this annually until the whole ground is trenched. It is
better, however, to trench the whole ground at once, if con-
venient, but if not, the mode we suggest will be found to be
perfectly successful.

If very large specimens are desired, cover the ground about
the tree in the autumn with five or six inches of horse manure,
and water with guano in the summer,—two pounds to the bar-
rel of water will be enough,—and thin out all inferior fruit.

The cultivator will find the best remedy against sun blight in
training his trees in pyramidal form, the low branches shading
the stem from the ardent heat of the summer sun. But this
blight sometimes occurs in winter, and generally upon the trunk
of the tree. If the trunk or stem be not protected by its own
branches, it is best to shade it by evergreen branches, or by
narrow strips of board put into the ground on the south side
of the tree. Sheltered places are best for the pear, as the
tender leaves are sometimes injured by high winds, and the
fruit shaken off.

Your committee suggest the following list of varieties for
cultivation, which, though by no means complete, will, it is be-
lieved, give satifaction to the cultivator.

For Summer.—Madalene, Bloodgood, Dearborn’s Seedling,.
Rostiezer, English Jargonelle.

Fall Pears.—Bartlett, Belle Lucrative, Flemish Beauty,
Seckel, St. Michael’s, Urbaniste, Beurré Diel, Louise Bonne de
Jersey, Vicar of Winkfield, and Duchesse d’Angouleme.

Winter Pears.—Winter Nelis, Passe Colmar, and Beurré
d’Aremberg.

EK. W. Buii, Chairman, pro tem.

FRUITS AND VEGETABLES. 415

Statement of Edmund Tufts.

I take pleasure in presenting for premium thirteen .speci-
mens of the real genuine St. Michael pears. This tree is
twenty-five feet in height, and was engrafted by my father, the
late Joseph Tufts, about forty years ago. The fruit of this
tree has been of so little account of late years that they were
scarcely worth picking, and consequently much neglected. Last
year the tree bore several dozens of pretty fair pears that found
a ready market at thirty-seven and a half cents per dozen. This
year I was enabled to obtain a bushel that were not cracked at
all, and which were purchased, at the hall of the Mechanic’s
Fair, by Mr. George H. Childs, confectioner, at his own offer,
which was four dollars for a bushel.

SoMERVILLE, October 4, 1853.

These pears—although possessing some interest as evidence
of the recovery of the St. Michael pear from the blight which
has so long defeated the hopes and efforts of cultivators—were
surpassed in size and beauty by many other dishes of the same
kind.

Mr. Tufts does not state whether he renovated his tree by
pruning and manuring, as has been sometimes done with old
trees of this variety.

From the Report of the Committee on other Fruits.

The committee chosen to examine all other fruits, excepting
pears and apples, have attended to their duty and beg leave to
report. They were highly gratified with the beautiful display
of every variety of fruit of the season, in this bright and
sunny, though temperate climate. The peaches were in great
abundance, and very fine for the season, many worthy of a pre-
mium. .

The show of grapes was magnificent, and the committee
were pleased to see so much attention paid to the cultivation
of this beautiful fruit, which has been heretofore sadly neglect_
ed. Long before other fruits were cultivated, much attention
was paid to the cultivation of the grape, by the Persians and

416 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

Syrians; and although not a native of Europe, it was long since
brought from Asia, first to Egypt, thence to Rome and France,
and thence to England by the Romans, six hundred years after
the Christian Era. It has been extensively cultivated for wine,
for drying, and as a desert fruit. As the foreign varieties have
never thrived in open culture in this country, it is highly neces-
sary that we should turn our attention to our native grapes;
and should the same attention be paid to the grape as to the
improvement of other fruits, we shall, ere long, undoubtedly
produce as fine varieties as those of other countries.

There were but two varieties of plums offered, being beau-
tiful specimens of Coe’s Golden Drop. There was so little
choice in the two, the committee were divided in opinion. Two
baskets of fruit were also offered.

BENJAMIN WHEELER, for the Committee.

WORCESTER NORTH.

From the Report of the Committee.

The committee on fruit congratulate the association on the
fine display exhibited, and the great improvement which the
few years since the first exhibition have made in the horticul-
ture and orcharding of our neighborhood. Although, from the
lateness of the season, but few of the earlier fruits could be
presented. The show of apples, pears, quinces, and the later
fruit, was excellent. The association are much indebted to
John Milton Earle, Esq., of Worcester, for his unrivalled dis-
play of pears, consisting of seventy-one varieties, which was in
itself an exhibition worthy the diligent study of all cultivators
of this delicious fruit. The committee regret that by the
rules of the association, they have no power to bestow any
more substantial reward than their thanks, for this fine addi-
tion to our festival.

The main feature of the exhibition, excepting the specimens
of Mr. Karle, were the apples; and the collection was large
and highly gratifying, both from the variety and the excellence.
of the respective samples. And the committee, after a few of

FRUITS AND VEGETABLES. 417

the first and most marked selections, were much embarrassed
in deciding on the merits of particular offerings.

The show of pears also, from our vicinity, was most credit-
able, and our quinces and grapes were in excellent condition.

It would be grateful to the committee, to enumerate and
refer in terms of praise to many of the specimens to which
they were unable to award premiums without increasing their
list beyond the just bounds of selection, but which were most
highly creditable to the cultivators, and will, we trust, return a
rich reward.

Among the curiosities of the exhibition, the committee
noticed a plate of full grown cherries, in good condition, picked
from a tree in his garden, on the day of the exhibition, by Mr.
Elliot Wood, of Fitchburg.

J. W. Mansur, Chairman.

HAMPDEN.

From the Report of the Committee.

The collections, for various and obvious reasons, are mostly
small, at the present exhibition, but contain some specimens of
rare merit. Very few apples and peaches were on the stand,
but they were generally excellent. The latter were all of that
variety known as Crawford’s Late Melocoton, and could hardly
be surpassed.

We would especially call attention to the large and choice
collections of pears exhibited by Messrs. Bliss & Haven, and
by Mr. D. C. Brewer. These, with other fine samples from
the gardens of our citizens, show not only that more attention
is being devoted to the culture of this delicious fruit, but also
that our soil and climate are well adapted for that purpose.
We doubt whether finer specimens were ever produced than
some of those now in this exhibition.

We naturally inquire then, why the pear culture is not more
extensively pursued? Why does not every one who has a
spare corner in his yard or garden plant a tree, dwarf or
standard? And why do not our cultivators supply our markets
with the finer varieties in sufficient quantities for table use?

53*

418 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

It is not because “it willnot pay.” No crop would pay better.
It is well known that pears of first rate quality readily com-
mand extravagant prices ; and it is certain that our home market,
at least, might be supplied with the best varieties at a much
greater profit to the producer than those which are ordinarily
presented for sale, and which are unfit for the table till cooked.

We suppose one reason for the neglect to which we refer is
this, viz.: the inferior fruits are more easily produced. All
our best, and all even of our good varieties are artificial pro-
ducts. They are the result of skill and care in culture, and
demand more attention than those which are at a less remove
from the original or lowest state. The common sour and
Mazzard cherries, the fox-grape, the crab-apple, and the choke-
pear can be produced with little or no care. But the good,
and especially the best varieties of each of these fruits require,
both in planting and training, closer attention, and a more
generous culture. But they will more than repay the necessa-
ry additional care and expense, as all will be sure to find who
will try the experiment.

Another explanation of the neglect to cultivate the best
varieties of pears, is found in the fact that the proper methods
of treating and ripening the fruit are not generally well under-
stood. It is left on the tree till decayed at the core, and then
regarded as worthless, because “it will not keep;” or it hangs
till the autumnal frosts arrive, and as it then presents no indi-
cations of fitness for any other use, is handed over to the cook.
But the late autumn and winter varieties can be well ripened
only after they are taken from the tree and placed in rooms of
the proper temperature, while most of those which are earlier
are much better when picked before they are fully matured,
and ripened in the house. A fact illustrative of these remarks
has come to our notice within the last week. One of our
citizens has a tree that annually produces several bushels of
the Beurré Diel pear; but not knowing the variety, and
neglecting to ripen it in the fruit room, he has hitherto given
over the entire crop to the cook, thinking it worthless till sub-
jected to a culinary process. And yet amore valuable and
palatable dessert fruit could hardly be placed on the table
than a well ripened Beurré Diel.

-

AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENTS. 419

It is much to be hoped that a larger share of attention will
be given to raising this and other fruits for table use. With
proper enterprise and pains on the part of producers, an abun-
dance of pears and grapes, fit for the dessert, may be introduced
to our market, making desirable additions to the strawberries,
cherries, peaches and apples, with which we are now so highly
favored, and affording large profits to those who raise them.

In taking leave of this topic, your committee would make
favorable mention of a small vineyard belonging to Edwin
Booth, Esq., and which they were invited to view. They found
on a small spot of ground—about forty square rods—the
Isabella and Catawba grape submitted to vineyard culture and
doing well. The vines were bearing profusely and ripening
quite satisfactorily. On the whole, your committee regard it
as a successful experiment, and advise others to do likewise,
and push the fruit into market. The demand, we venture to
affirm, will. keep pace with the supply of good and well-ripened
grapes.

R. H. Seeny, Chairman.

AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENTS.

MIDDLESEX.

Statement of A. W. Putnam.

Horse Rackets —Having had considerable experienee in
using horse rackets for the last five years, I wish to communi-
cate to you, and through you to the public, some improvements
which I have made, so that my brother farmers who wish to
reclaim their wild and uncultivated meadows, and make them
the most productive and beautiful portions of their farms, may
avoid some of the troubles and vexations I have met with. I
commenced with a set of the stylemarked No.1. I found two
serious objections; first, they chafed the ankle where the strap
buckled around it; second, as the foot had but one bearing on
the bar, constant use, day after day, made the bottom of the
foot quite sore. I then took a set of the style marked No, 2.

420 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

They also had two great objections, but entirely different.
First. It was very difficult to keep them on. Second. They
had to be made with so large a proportion of the wood front
of the foot, that it was very hard fora horse to work with
them. After I had had any reasonable amount of trouble with
these, I invented and made a set of the style marked No. 3,
which worked well, and seemed for a while to obviate every
difficulty ; they were much liked in this vicinity; some twelve
or fifteen procured sets of them. They worked well while the
straps were new and strong, but with constant use they would
not continue so but a short tithe. After using them one season,
I found the cost of straps, together with the time it took to
mend and replace them, quite a heavy item. I then tried to
substitute iron for leather, and at last succeeded. The result
is set No. 4, to which I would call your particular attention.
The woods are new. The irons were made last season, and
are the first ever made. They have worn out one set of woods.
They are easier for a horse than any other kind I have ever
seen. They are fast taking the place of all other kinds in
this vicinity; we have no trouble now with chafed ankles, sore
feet, rackets off, a horse in the mud, broken straps, &c. &c.
I wish all who have occasion to use rackets, to have the benefit
of this style until they can get something better.

LexineTon, October 4, 1853.

HAMPSHIRE.

From the Report of the Committee.

Inventive genius is progressive. It never ceases in its con-
stant and untiring efforts. Its motto is “Excelsior,” and its
aim, perfection. Onward and upward, ever has been, and ever
will be, its triumphant march. No obstacle, however difficult,
seems to impede its course,—no eminence is too high for it to
surmount. Like a mighty river, wide and deep, that flows
fearlessly over rocks and through mountain defiles to the sea;
the genius of invention moves on with irresistible power. At
the present day, the creations of mechanical genius rise up
around us in so many multiplied and surprising forms, that we

AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENTS. 421

are astonished and awed. While we survey with delight and
admiration, one of her recent combinations, another and still
another appears, more wonderful and pleasing still. Our wives,
whose mothers and grandmothers were obliged to card, spin,
weave and knit nearly every wearing fabric in use, are relieved
of such drudgery, by the invention of the power-loom. Ma-
chinery accomplishes the work, in a hundredth part of the time
and, I was about to say, with a hundredth part of the expense.
Our wives and daughters can now devote their time to other
employments, quite as useful as spinning or weaving, and far
less laborious and irksome. The old fashioned hand-cards,
spinning-wheel, and loom, are curiosities, at the present day.
I well remember the monotonous hum of the spinning-wheel,
and the delight I took in seeing my good old mother warp and
weave; but little thought how tedious and severe was the labor.
Thanks to the “mechanic arts,” for the safe package of the
whole paraphernalia in some dark corner of the garret !

All trades have received a new impulse, and are carried on
with comparative ease and despatch. We may cite the split-
ting and shaving of shingles; the manufacture of wheel-spokes
and felloes; the shaving and shaping of axe, hoe, and broom
handles; of barrel-heads and staves,—all which processes were
formerly done by hand; but are now performed by ingenious
and much admired machines, contrived by American genius,
Among the improved tools, we may name the axe, saw, chisel.
plane, and all kinds of carpenters’ tools, which are less clumsy,
of better material, and of higher finish. While examining, not
long ago, some beautiful bench tools, manufactured by our own,
mechanics, we could not but revert to the “pod augur days” of
yore,—the contrast was so striking, between the olden and
modern implements. A pod augur! Did you ever see one?
And could you ever solve the problem satisfactorily to your
own mind, how any mechanic, though a Hercules in strength,
could penetrate twelve inches into seasoned oak timber with a
square-ended gouge, yclept a pod augur? As for us, the hard-
est problem of Euclid were an easy task to it.

In the olden time, travelling was done principally on horse-
back. It was not uncommon for a gentleman and lady to ride
upon the same animal, at the same time; the gentleman upon

422 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

the saddle, and the lady, behind, upon a pillion. Wagons were
next contrived, but of very rude character, as many of us well
remember; consisting of four wheels,—two very large, and two
in front very small, with wooden axletrees, and a canoe-shaped
body perched directly upon the axletrees. Add to this a high-
backed wooden seat, upon a pair of wooden springs, and you
have the pleasure and business carriage, common among us,
forty years ago. A little later, came the chaise and the thor-
ough-braced wagon, hung upon straps of leather; and at length,
within a few years, the elegant four-wheeled, steel-springed
carriages, of varied form, so convenient, beautiful, and easy, let
the highways be ever so rough or smooth. There are those
living, who have journeyed both in the ancient and modern vehi-
cle; and whose rheumatic joints, if they could speak, would
bless the modern carriage-makers.

But we must not omit the improved implements of husbandry.
In no art has there been a more marked advance. New tools
have been invented, and old ones improved, until farming has be-
come comparatively an easy task. Look at the plough of to-
day ; and then at the uncouth, wooden, iron-sided thing, bearing
that name, of thirty yearsago. Whatwas it? A heavy wooden
beam, with a wooden mould-board, plated with straps of
wrought iron, to which was fastened a wrought iron nose of
clumsy construction. It was a heavy, cloggy thing to manage,
both for man and beast, and did its work badly. Compare this
implement with the cast-iron plough of the present day, and
comment is unnecessary. Hoes, too, have received the finish-
ing touch of the ‘mechanic. Those presented by Messrs.
Graves & Hatch, of North Leverett, were the most beautiful
and perfect articles of the kind, we ever saw. Formerly,
a hoe was a flat, thick, square piece of iron, with a ferrule
welded upon one side, into which was fastened a handle; an
unwieldly, tiresome tool, heavily taxing the muscles of the
laborer. Now ahoe is just what it should be; a well-formed,
polished steel plate, rightly proportioned and tempered, lithe,
light and flexible; with a well-formed socket for the handle
and, when finished, it is an ornament. About the same differ-
ence may be observed between other agricultural implements
of old and modern times. The pitch-fork and manure-fork, for-

AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENTS. 423

merly, were huge, misshapen things, of very clumsy construction,
and resembling the fork of “ Old Nick,” or the trident of Nep-
tune in the picture books. Now, a fork, whether for pitching
hay or manure, is as light and pliable as a willow stem, yet
strong and not easily broken. Formerly, all kinds of grain
were cut with the sickle and cradle. Now, the reaping-
machine does the work in a twentieth part of the time. It was
threshed out with the flail, with a great deal of hard, dirty labor,
and winnowed with a hand fan, an implement resembling a coal-
box with one of its sides knocked out. Now, the threshing-
machine and winnowing-mill prepare the grain with much ease
and nicety for the granary, with much less cost and labor. By
means of better scythes, and the horse-rake, at least one-half
the expense of making hay is saved. The cultivator and seed-
planter save avast amount of labor formerly done with the
hoe.

The American farmer has great reason to be proud of the
inventive genius of his countrymen. Ours is comparatively a
new country, and want, which is always a prominent feature in
a new country, sets genius to work. American ingenuity has
not only equalled in its developments the mother country, but
outstripped her, for our wants, and consequently our efforts
have been greater. The peculiarity of American genius is its
highly inventive character. Nor is it exactly like that of any
other country. It picks tbeir locks; it invents and fashions a
vessel that outsails, on their own waters, before their own eyes,
all their boats, brigs, schooners and yachts, and leaves them
tugging behind, like a school of tired porpoises. They look
amazed, and are ready to burst with vexation to see Jonathan
behave so. We have shown to the world the most ingenious
machine ever made in any country for cutting grain. We
could cut over some of the small kingdoms of Europe with that
machine, about as soon as any of the inhabitants could reap
half a dozen acres with a sickle. We make the best ploughs
and scythes; India rubber goods, and the sweetest toned musi-
cal instruments. We invent the queerest machinery for saving
manual labor, and contrive to have the best wives and the
prettiest daughters found in any country.

Davip Rice, Chairman.

424. MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

-”

NORFOLK.

From the Report of the Committee.

The committee on agricultural implements report that it is
due to Mr. Henry Partridge, Jr., of Medfield, that the exhi-
bition was not perfectly barren of those articles which most
appropriately symbolize the great science of agriculture, and
which, as much as any thing, mark its progress and contribute
to its success.

The articles constituting the largest collection, were gathered
in one of the city warehouses, and comprised a sample of the
ordinary implements of agriculture, such as have been in com-
mon use. The premium was offered, to induce manufacturers
and dealers to add to the interest of the exhibitions by present-
ing articles so intimately connected with agriculture, and so
indicative of the progress of the art.

The changes and improvements which have been made in
agricultural implements in the space of ten or twenty years,
are marked and significant, but from year to year, it is difficult
to discern, in the ordinary implements, any remarkable alter-
ations. In the annual list of patents there are many in the
agricultural department which are designed chiefly for the sec-
tions where farming is done on a far larger scale than here in
New England. The character of our soil, and its rough and
uneven surface, obstruct the operation of those labor-saving
machines, which have been so extensively introduced into the
Western States, including, also, the State of New York.

During the year 1852, letters patent were granted for in-
ventions and improvements in agricultural implements in num-
ber as follows: churns, nine; corn shellers, two; cultivators,
three; grain separaters, four; harvesters of grain and grass,
twenty; hoes, one; hullers of rice and buckwheat, three; seed
planters, twenty-four; ploughs, fourteen; potato diggers, two;
potato washers, one; rakes, four; straw cutters, four; thresh-
ers, four; winnowers, four; ox yokes, three, and some others;
and among all the hundred patentees, not more than two or
three are from the State of Massachusetts, and not more than
six from all the other New England States.

AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENTS. 425

By reference to the catalogue of the machines and imple-
ments on exhibition at the Crystal Palace, it would appear
that, at last, even in the agricultural department, labor was
about to be nearly all performed by the power of steam or the
strength of animals, and that intellect and intelligence, and not
muscle, are to be the chief capital of the farmer. |

An unnecessary alarm was excited some years ago, lest the
multiplication of substitutes for human labor would so cheapen
it, that men would find it difficult to gain employment, and if
they should chance to find it, the wages would be too little to
support them. The prospect of a railroad from the West,
sent terror at one time into the breasts of our farmers, lest
the cheap productions of the prairies should render those of
their own soil valueless; but fears of that description have
long since vanished. The more railroads, and the more labor-
saving machines, the higher the prices of agricultural products.
It was not uncommon to find flour selling sixty miles from the
sea-board, in Massachusetts, twenty years ago, at $5.50 per bar-
rel, while at the same place at this time it will bring $3 more,
notwithstanding all the improvements of modern times. There
is no danger, therefore, that the products of agriculture will
suffer for the want of purchasers, until a new order of things
shall dawn; but, on the other hand, there is danger, that owing
to the facilities afforded to speculators, we shall be forced to
pay starvation prices for provisions, while cargoes of flour and
corn, of American growth, are selling at half-price, or moulding
in the overburdened ports of Australia and California.

KE. L. KEYES, Chairman.
54*

426 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

al

FRUIT CULTURE.

From an Address before the Essex Society, Sept. 28, 1853.
BY JOSEPH 8. CABOT, ESQ.

Upon the cultivation of fruit, both on account of its intrinsic
importance, as well as that it is at this time a matter of very
general interest, I propose to make some observations :-—
The apple, I am inclined to think, is the fruit best adapted to
general cultivation in New England, and the one whose culti-
vation will be found most profitable. The tree is a hardy tree,
now thoroughly and entirely acclimated, is not subject to
disease; it will grow and flourish in almost every soil, unless a
dry sand, or wet swamp. It bears abundant crops, its fruit is
of universal use and commands a ready sale, and will be found,
it is thought, in the long run more profitable for cultivation
than more delicate fruits requiring more care, though such,
when in perfection, find a sale at a high price. Apples too,
especially sweet apples, may be used as food for animals—
cows and swine, and any surplus in the crop, or such as are
unsuited to market, may in this way be disposed of with advan-
tage. There exists among farmers such universal experience
in the cultivation of the apple, that to say much upon the sub-
ject seems an unnecessary tax upon your time, unless it may be
that cultivation of some kind is essential to a healthy, vigorous
crowth of the tree, and to a crop and perfect fruit. If an
orchard is worth setting out, it is worth cultivating; the ground
beneath and around the trees at least should be kept broken
up, mellow, free from weeds and properly supplied with nourish-
ment, otherwise the trees become dwarfed and stunted, and the
fruit, if ever produced, small, knurly and inferior; and yet it is
no unusual thine to see apple trees set out in grass land, where
the young trees cannot thrive. If the ground of the orchard
cannot be wholly spared from other purposes, it should be
devoted to the raising of root or other crops, that call for culti-
vation, and the application occasionally to the soil of manures—
and should not be laid down to grass until the trees have attain-
ed age and size; even then, this will be attended with diminu-
tion of vigor to the tree, and of perfection to the fruit. When

FRUIT CULTURE. 42'T.

the raising of apples, for the market is pursued as part of the
business of the farm, probably the best course to adopt, is, to
devote a portion of it to this purpose and to keep such in high
condition, by constant cultivation; indeed, under no other cir-
cumstances, can some varieties of this fruit, as the Williams
Favorite, for instance, be produced in perfection. The object
of the cultivator, should be to produce the greatest crop of
fruit, in its highest state of perfection, and in no other way can
this be reasonably expected, but by keeping of the soil in pro-
per condition and suitably supplied with nourishment.

The varieties of apples are so numerous,—there being in
in almost every district, some one of local origin, the knowl-
edge of which may be confined to such district, that every
one in making a selection of varieties, must to some extent
depend upon his own taste and discrimination; still there are
many varieties of established reputation, that may be recom-
mended for general cultivation. Among such of the earlier
varieties, may be named the Harly Harvest, and the Putnam
Harvest, of, I suppose, local name and origin—a great bearer in
alternate years, less acid than the Early Harvest, and therefore
better suited to the dessert—the Harly Sweet Bough, the Red
Astracan, and Williams Favorite; of the autumn varieties, the
Fall Harvey, the Porter and the Gravenstein; and for winter,
the Hubbardston Nonesuch, the Hurlburt, the Westfield Seek-
no-farther, the Minister, Rhode Island Greening, Baldwin,
Hunt’s Russet and others; while, for sweet apples, there is
the Seaver’s Sweet, the Danvers Winter Sweet, and for late
keeping, the Ladies’ Sweeting, and an apple from Portsmouth,
a Seedling, known there as the Ledge apple.

The Baldwin is so universal, and has been so long an estab-
lished favorite in this county, that its cultivation has, to a con-
siderable extent, superseded that of other winter varicties;
bearing only in alternate years, and then usually most abundant-
ly, it is becoming at such times, from its abundance, a drug in
the market; on this account farmers will probably find it for
their advantage, if in place of, or addition to, Baldwins, they
would cultivate some other varieties, for this purpose the Hub-
bardston Nonesuch, Hurlburt, Minister, and Hunt’s Russet, may
be perhaps selected with advantage.

428 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

The cultivation of the pear for some time past has occupied
much attention, especially with amateurs, even to the exclusion
of that of every other species of fruit. For the dessert it is the
most valuable one we possess, the range of its season extending
through nearly the whole year. Its varieties are very numer-
ous, some collections in this county containing many hundreds
of different names. The pear tree, though hardy, is less so
than the apple, and in selecting a site for a pear orchard, care
should be taken to choose one somewhat sheltered, a slight
declivity sloping to the south or west, or level, defended on the
north and east, affords perhaps a preferable situation. The
high winds that prevail in our climate, and the intense heat of
the sun, should both be guarded against, and from the evil
effects of both, sufficient protection may perhaps be found in
close planting—not sufficiently close, however, to impede a free
circulation of the air, for this is essential to the production of
fine fruit, a manifest difference being apparent between that
grown under this condition and that, when from some cause
this free circulation is much obstructed. If sometimes injurious
to the tree, the great heat of our climate, particularly in Aueust
and September, when the heat of the day is succeeded by cool
nights, is favorable to the fruit, in maturing its juices, and
bringing its flavor to the greatest perfection. The roots of
the pear tree, especially while young, require protection, and
this may be afforded by a covering of litter, thatch, straw,
spent tan, or similar substances. It is not so much the severity
of the cold that is to be guarded against, as the heaving the
ground caused by its repeated freezings and thawings; and to
the effect of winter, may the loss of young pear trees, that so
frequently occur, be usually ascribed, rather than to those
causes to which this destruction is commonly imputed. What-
ever covering may have been used to protect the roots in spring.
should be left round the trees in summer, to operate as a
mulching, that, keeping the ground moist and cool, tends to
promote their health and vigor.

Proper attention should be given to the preparation of the
ground, before planting, by draining, where necessary, to get
rid of stagnant or under-ground water—by deep ploughing, or
better, by trenching, that the roots may readily extend to a

FRUIT CULTURE. 429

sufficient depth, that the air and heat may penetrate it, and the
rain pass through it, and it should be made sufficiently rich by
manure, if not already so, for a crop of corn. In planting, the
holes should be made larger in diameter than the extent of the
roots, and the tree should not be set too deep. It is an opera-
tion that with care, may be performed successfully in either
autumn or spring; the former, especially for large trees, seems
to me the preferable season, the ground being then usually in a
better condition,

The pear tree seems to thrive best in a deep, rich, moderately
moist, not wet, clayey loam, though so far as the fruit only is
concerned, all varieties do not seem equally suited to the same
soil, some apparently arriving at greater perfection, in a stiff,
others in a light soil. For orchard or open culture, pears should
be grown on their own roots; in gardens, they are frequently
cultivated on the quince; for this, however, some varieties will
not answer, seeming never to thrive, or to become perfectly
united with the stock; while there are others, that appear to
assimilate to, and become completely incorporated with, the
quince. There is evidently a great difference in the growth of
different varieties of pear trees, some being of strong, rapid,
vigorous growth, others, of weak, slow and feeble habit. In
grafting or budding the different varieties, attention should be
paid to these differences, so as not to work a strong growing
variety upon a feeble stock.

The pear tree is impatient of the knife, and the removal of
large limbs, when rendered necessary, is not unfrequently at-
tended with injurious consequences—no other pruning is called
for, than that required for the removal of cross limbs, and the
proper shaping of the tree. :

The proper cultivation of the pear has been, perhaps, suffi-
ciently indicated, by what has already been said. The ground
round the trees, at least, should be kept loose, mellow and free
of weeds, and covered with a suitable mulching of litter, spent
tan, or like substance, and made sufficiently rich to sustain a
healthy, vigorous growth, for which purpose the application to
the soil of peat, or meadow muck mixed with wood ashes, and
an addition of ground bones, is considered suitable. Guano,.
mixed with the bore black of the sugar refineries, in the pro-

430 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

portion of one-fourth of guano to three-fourths of bone black,
and Mape’s improved super-phosphate of lime, as manufactured
for sale, will, as I believe, be found a proper and efficacious
manure for orchards.

Rain water, in copious supply, seems to have a highly stimu-
lating effect upon the fruit as well as the tree, and where fruit
of extra size is desired, in addition to a due supply of manure,
and thinning of the fruit, copious waterings with rain water
will probably materially tend to this result.

The number of varieties of the pear is so great, very
many of which have not yet been thoroughly tested, that it is
not easy to decide which are the best; and much less so to
point out those most suited to orchard culture, and to that
only are these remarks intended to apply, as for this pur-
pose many circumstances must be taken into consideration,
such as the size and quality of the fruit, the vigor, hardi-
hood and productiveness of the tree, and others that may
affect its adaptation to general cultivation. The safest
course for beginners in cultivating this fruit, is to confine
their selection at first to such varieties as have been thor-
oughly tried, and are of established reputation. I do not
intend now, to recommend any varieties as worthy of gencral
cultivation, but in order not to pass the subject wholly by in
silence, will name a few about which among fruit growers, no
great difference of opinions exist. The Madeleine is usually
considered the best very early pear, but seems in danger of be-
ing superseded by the Doyenné d’Eté, a small, but handsome,
fruit. Manning’s Elizabeth, one of Van Mon’s, unnamed pears,
so called by the late Robert Manning, promises to be adapted
to orchard culture, as does the Beurré d’Amalis, a pear of
large size, though not of the first quality ; the Rostiezer, a small
but exceedingly high-flavored variety, and that universal favor-
ite, the Bartlett, flourishing apparently every where, and under
all circumstances. All these may be considered summer pears.
Among the autumn varieties, of such as are in general highly
esteemed, that scem suited to general cultivation, may be
named the Andrews, of American origin, the Golden Beurré of
Bilboa, the Swan Orange, the Bonne Louise de Jersey, the
Seckel, the Belle Lucrative, the Urbaniste, the Beurré Bose,

FRUIT CULTURE. 431

and the Fulton. Among the best winter pears are the Law-
rence, a native fruit from Long Island, the Winter Nelis, the
Beurré d’Aremberg, the Cross, from Newburyport, the Glout
Morceau, especially suited to the quince and Easter Beurré.
The Columbia is a very large and handsome pear, but is so
liable to be blown off, even by a very slight breeze, before it
is ripe, as to be only suited to cultivation in very sheltered
places, or when trained very low, and therefore not adapted to
orchard culture. The Vicar of Winkfield, or Monsieur le Curé,
is a very large pear, but though sometimes good, varies greatly
in quality, and under the most favorable circumstances seems to
require a peculiar process in ripening to fit it for the table;
it is, however,a good bearer, and valuable for cooking. Among
the best pears for cooking, may be named the Uvedale’s St.
Germain, or Pound Pear, and the Catillac. These lists might be
much extended, but I have purposely refrained from mentioning
the more recently introduced pears, because at present, and
until more thoroughly tested, such seem better suited to the pur-
poses of the amateur than the farmer.

At present, perhaps because they are less plenty, the culti-
vation of winter pears, when such are raised in perfection, is
the most profitable, but perhaps it is the most difficult, requir-
ing the most care in the cultivation; some varieties demand
warm and sheltered situations, some to be assisted in ripening
by some artificial process, while of none, unless it be for cook-
ing, has their adaptation to orchard culture been perhaps fully
tested.

’ The proper mode of ripening winter pears, is a matter of
consequence to growers, and must remain probably for some
time to come, a matter of experiment. With some varieties,
as the Winter Nelis and Beurré d’Aremberg, no care seems
necessary; such arrive at perfect maturity under any circum-
stances, but there are others, as the Vicar of Winkfield, that
appear to require the aid of some particular process. Those
requiring such assistance, may be placed in tight boxes, de-
posited in a cool, moist place,—though of course not exposed
to frost,—where they may remain, until the usual period of the
maturity of the variety arrives, when they should be removed
to a warmer room. The ripening of some sorts of pears may

432 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

be retarded, and their season thereby prolonged, without injury
to the quality of the fruit; but with others, this can only be
done at the cost of loss of flavor; with them, when the process
of ripening has once commenced, no attempt should be made to
check it, or delay the period of maturity.

The preservation of fruits is an important matter, and one
that has received much attention, fruit rooms or houses being
frequently erected especially with reference to this object—
such are usually constructed with hollow walls, and these filled
in with charcoal dust, chaff, tan, or other supposed non-con-
ductors of heat. In order to preserve it, fruit is sometimes
put on ice, but by this method, if effectual for the purpose in-
tended, the flavor and quality of the fruit is frequently injured.
To preserve fruit in perfection, it is necessary to maintain a
uniformity of temperature, and at a point below that at which
fermentation usually occurs, say at from thirty-eight to forty-
five degrees, according to the particular species or kind.
Another condition essential to this purpose is a uniform degree
of moisture in the air. To have some particular varieties of
pears in perfection, it is necessary, while ripening, or to pro-
mote that process, to increase, by artificial means, the moisture
of the air by which they are surrounded. A uniform degree of
pressure from the atmosphere is also important, in order to
prevent the shrivelling of the fruit. Although all these con-
ditions are not attained thereby, perhaps the best practical
mode, as yet ascertained, for the preservation or prolonging
the season of any variety of fruit, is by the construction of
rooms for the purpose on the principles referred to.

Fruit, especially apples and pears, it is hardly necessary to
say, cannot be gathered too carefully, neither can too much care
be used in placing it in the barrels or boxes; great caution,
too, should be used, when it becomes necessary to move the
packages in which they are placed, particularly with such as
may be intended for export to distant markets; as slight
bruises cause injury and early decay. Fruit should be gath-
ered during dry weather, and not immediately after a rain.

DESCENT OF LAND. 433

DESCENT OF LAND.

From an Address before the Worcester NSsciety, September
22, 1853.

BY HON. GEORGE S. BOUTWELL.

Agriculture, not immediately, but in the future, is interested
in the policy of the government. I have said that it was the
duty of the government to establish and maintain institutions of
general and special learning, enact proper laws for the descent
and distribution of land, and also to foster a liberal commercial
system. In regard to institutions of learning, Massachusetts
has done so much, if not always her duty, that there is no dis-
position and little cause for complaint.

The division, possession and descent of land, have furnished
many difficult questions in economy, politics and social life.
The government and people of Rome were often violently agi-
tated by the disputes which arose concerning the public lands;
and the elections of consuls and tribunes were generally deter-
mined by these questions. And in this country the land re-
formers have thrown new elements into the political cauldron,
which, without their aid, would at any moment feast the eyes
of the witehes of Macbeth. The monopoly of the land by the
nobles and church was one of the causes of the Revolution of
1789 in France, and the same cause has often threatened the
peace of Great Britain. I do not now, however, intend to dis-
cuss it politically, but as a moral and industrial question. It is
desirable morally, politically and socially, that a large proportion
of the people should be landholders, but it does not therefore
follow, as some would have us believe, that every man has a
right to an equal portion, or a portion of the earth. For if so,
why has he not a right to a horse or an ox wherewith to culti-
vate it? And if toa portion of land described by metes and
bounds, why not to a portion of the seas, lakes and rivers?
But no—neither the earth, nor the sea, nor any part thereof,
was created for any particular man, but for the generations of
men, through long successive ages, destined to possess, occupy
and use, so that each shall work out the highest form of civili-
zation of which it is capable.

55*

434 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

The claim of the individual upon society or the state is satis-
fied when no unnecessary obstacle prevents the exercise of the
powers with which he is blessed for his own greatest good and
the good of his fellow men. <A possession of land is not differ-
ent in principle from any other possession. And we are to
acquire and use property subject to one and the same rule, to
wit, so as not to injure that which is another’s. And this rule,
I think, is the perfection of human reason. In ail countries,
governments have assumed to own lands. In some cases those
lands have been granted to court favorites, in others, as com-
pensation for distinguished public services, and in other cases
still they have been sold to citizens without any discrimination.
The right of a government to own such land as is necessary
for public purposes, cannot be questioned; but beyond this, it
can only properly hold it in trust for the whole people, to be
sold to those who may wish to purchase and cultivate. And
indeed if lands are to be held by non-cultivators they may as
well be held by individuals as by the whole people. Therefore,
while the policy of a government should be favorable to actual
settlers and always regard their interests, it seems impossible
to exclude speculators altogether.

Nor can it be admitted that those who desire land shall re-
ceive it of the government without price. The government, or
in other words, the whole people, cannot acquire land without
cost, either by purchase or conquest, more than individuals.
Whatever that cost is, it has been paid, and upon what princi-
ple of morals or politics shall those who have bought lands
with their own labor be required to give farms to those who
have none? ‘Those who have purchased of the government or
of individuals, would be hardly treated if lands were conveyed
to others as a gratuity. But on the other hand, the state may
not hold lands for mere revenue or for purposes of speculation
and gain. Our laws furnish a sufficient remedy for the evil of
speculative purchases. If capitalists acquire large tracts, they
must be broken up by the force of events under the guide of the
general laws of distribution. And it will be remembered that
the Roman law limiting a man’s possessions in land was seldom
enforced. The life of one man does not admit of great accu-
mulation, and if the state did not create factitious personages

DESCENT OF LAND. 435

and vest lands in these creatures of the law, and if the general
rule of distribution was inflexible, our system of titles could not
be amended. The conclusion is, that justice requires that those
who receive lands should pay, but that it is true policy by low
prices to induce citizens to become freeholders.

We have no laws of entail or primogeniture in this country,
but the two evils I have suggested are so near to those laws in
principle, and so well calculated to work out similar results,
that I think them worthy of consideration when we notice the
influence of tenures and titles upon the agricultural interests of
Massachusetts. The nature of the titles by which men or cor-
porations hold land is not important to the present generation;
but we ought to consider that Massachusetts is even yet in her
infancy; that land is not valued here as in many parts of the
world, and that every obstacle to its free sale and transfer will
hereafter be accounted an evil. But I desire, gentlemen, that
what I am about to say shall be received as suggestion rather
than as opinion or argument.

And in this view, my first suggestion relates to what appears
to be the extraordinary power of persons, by will or testa-
ment, to control estates after their own decease. And first,
the law which permits this, does not seem to be founded upon
any principle. We allow a person to provide, by will, that a
particular estate shall vest, at his death, in a corporation ex-
isting or created for that object, and that the rent shall be
applied forever to some eleemosynary or other similar pur-
pose. The existence of such a power implies absolute prop-
erty in land, equally as if we allowed a man to bequeath the
income of his estates to his eldest son, and so on, by the rule
of primogeniture, for ever. But we have admitted the former
power, and refused the latter. I see not, I confess, why we
should permit either. Upon principle, then, can we find a
reason why the entailment of the income of estates, which is
the whole estate when the entailment is perpetual, should be
permitted in one class of cases and not in others? ©

Let us consider the right which a man can acquire inland. Is
it an absolute, unqualified property in and control over it? Or
is it, rather, the right to use it during his life? If the latter,
(and I have the honor to suggest that it is,) some of the pro-

436 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

visions of our law of testament are as false in principle as the
laws of entail and primogeniture. But if the first inquiry indi-
cates the nature of property in land, then the living men of any
generation have the moral right to declare who shall use the
land assigned by. political or natural considerations to the
various states of the world, and also to announce, by a per-
petual decree, to whom or what the profits shall inure. This
doctrine, without limitation, can no where be defended. lt
will be observed that Iam not speaking of the transmission of
property from parent to child; this is the natural and just
policy of the law, not the will of the original proprietor living
and acting after his death. The inquiry I submit, then, by
way of suggestion, is this: Ought the use and income of land to
be determined within certain limitations, for a term of years, or
without time, by the will of the present occupant, he not being
the state nor immortal, or by a general rule of public policy
which shall permit each generation, without revolution or vio-
lence, to use the land, and the income of the land in the way it
thinks fit? The law, I submit, makes a distinction which has
no foundation in principle, when it allows a testator to
bequeath property to a corporation for a specific purpose for-
ever, and does not allow him to make a similar bequest to
those who are bone of his bone, and flesh of his flesh.

But the distinction of the law may by some be defended upon
grounds of public policy. And it is agreed that a requisition
of public policy is a reason why an admitted principle should not
be universally applied. The wisdom of our ancestors is not
more marked in any thing than in the abolition of the rule of
primogeniture; yet this rule has existed in many countries,—
Judea, Sparta and Great Britain —and its advocates would find
something plausible now to say in its defence. We borrowed
our rule of descent mainly from Rome, but the Roman rule has
not everywhere been taken as wise public policy. Now, then,
our law says that it is bad policy to allow the eldest son to
inherit to the exclusion of his brethren. So we all say. But
the rule of primogeniture was not established, and does not
exist, without a reason. In feudal countries the law of primo-
geniture seems to have sprung naturally from the relations of
society required by feudalism. But these relations do not fur-

DESCENT OF LAND. 437

nish a reason pertinent to this discussion, and moreover, the
rule has existed where this reason was wanting. But what
more natural, even at a period anterior to the Middle Ages in
Europe, than that the law should secure to each family a home?
And is not this the enunciated theory of the reformers of this
day? And in a country unequal in extent to a large and in-
creasing population, what so natural and reasonable as that
each family should be represented by one of its own members,
who, in a patriarchal sense, should hold the estate in trust for
the benefit of the whole line and name? And if one was to be
selected, who so proper as the eldest son? And at this day,
so does this reason live in the hearts of men, the public opinion
of Great Britain outlaws from social life the inheritor of titles
and estates who neglects the claims of his family and kindred.
Here, then, is a reason, not a satisfactory, but a plausible
reason, for the rule of primogeniture.

Now, gentlemen, can as good a reason be offered in defence
of the policy of America which allows a corporation to take
land and use the income forever, subject only to the will of a
donor or testator who long since ceased to have an interest in
the affairs of men? IconfessI think not. It is claimed that
these donations, bequests and foundations are usually for chari-
table purposes. Granted. But the charity which the law of
primogeniture contemplates falls upon one’s own household,
and can there be any more sacred charity than that? And
while you will not allow the man of to-day to furnish a home,
clothing and education, to his own descendants forever, why
should you permit him, to feed, clothe and educate the children
of other men? It is the right of each generation to use the
bounties and blessings of nature and of God, whether they be of
the ocean or of the land, of houses, of goods, or of gold, so as to
reach the end which the civilization of that age seeks; and it is
the corresponding duty of each generation to use its wealth,
whether it be of mind or of matter, for the greatest good of the
greatest number. And leaving, for a moment, the laws and
traditions of men, let us learn a lesson of faith from nature and
our profession.

As the proper cultivation of the soil by one proprietor en-
riches and blesses every subsequent owner, so the right use of

438 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

whatsoever we possess will enable us to transmit wealth to the
coming generations, where we have inherited only poverty,
from those that are gone. I speak nothing against charity,
nothing against education, nothing—surely nothing—against
religion, but I think that the wisdom of a living generation,
applied to its own affairs, is preferable to the wisdom of a
dead generation. Now the law of primogeniture, and the
law which permits the accumulation of mortmain estates for
eleemosynary purposes, had their origin both in fear. Fear in
the one case, that families, or members of familes, might be
unable to provide for themselves; and fear in the other case,
that future generations may not make proper provision for
charity and education. If this fear in the latter case is well
founded, the remedy will be ineffectual; for a people thus lost
to the duties of charity and education, cannot be trusted to
apply funds, however obtained. On the other hand, if a people
are intelligently alive to these subjects, funds thus vested will
be unnecessary, for their available means would always be equal
to their wants.

But more than this. Special evils take deep and vigorous
root in general wrongs, and many estates in England, and some
in this country, are so hampered with restrictions laid on them
by men who could not see the future, that they give but little
aid to the causes they were intended to promote. To be sure,
when it is no longer possible to apply the funds according to
the will of the donor or testator, the law comes in and fur-
nishes relief; but this power is very much like the power of
impeachment asa remedy for a bad system of government.
The remedy is resorted to only in aggravated cases, while the
great mass of the evil remains untouched.

It is not supposed that the amount of mortmain estates will
affect the public welfare at present—perhaps never. But of
this, we cannot be certain. As land increases in value and be-
comes more desirable as a subject of investment, the managers
of these estates are likely to become purchasers of the soil.

But there are two other causes at work, in aid of the evil
of which we speak. One is the desire to do good, the other is
the desire to be immortal. Of the desire to do good, we speak
with respect. Persons who have been fortunate in pecuniary

DESCENT OF LAND. 439

matters, feel that they are almoners of the bounty, and often
proceed to appropriate it to charity, education, or religion, as
though nobody else had a right to be consulted. Sometimes it
happens that the desire to do good and the passion for immor-
tality are blended together, and institutions are established—
as the Girard College, for example—which do violence to the
religious sentiments of one age, and may shock the civilization
and religion of all succeeding times. A majority of men do
not act wisely, when they will what they themselves can no
longer use; and their contributions to the cause of humanity
would be greater, if they left their estates to the operation of
the rule of law, in the belief that a just portion would find its
way to the poor, the ignorant and the unfortunate. Other men,
it is feared, lead a life of economy—sometimes of parsimony—
that at death they may found an institution or contribute to
a charity whose record shall make them immortal. For the
cause of humanity, let the number of these be few, but it may
be considerable. And if among us all there is a man who dis-
regards the common obligations of life, who has no neighbor-
hood, no social, no domestic, no religious relations or ties,
which draw him from the mad pursuit of wealth, and whose
summit of ambition is to transmit his poor name to posterity,
may he cease to be an object of respect either living or dead.
If in centuries, as the result of a noble love of good, or a low
passion for immortality, or the union of both, a considerable
portion of our soil should become inalienable in the hands of
corporations, it would be an occasion of complaint, a source of
suffering, a cause of decay. If we view our State as destined
to live for centuries—if not, indeed, as we trust, immortal—it
is essential to agricultural success, to the purity and perfection
of social life, that every obstacle to the alienation of estates,
and their free transmission from one hand to another, should
be removed.

440 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

=~

SCIENCE IN AGRICULTURE.

From an Address before the Worcester West Society, Sep-
tember 30, 1853.

BY PROFESSOR WILLIAM C. FOWLER.

In agriculture, as in manufactures and commerce, science,
united with practical skill, and common sense and energy of
character, is necessary in order to give the most successful
direction to labor and capital.

Mr. President, and gentlemen of the Society—Do you not,
upon the bare statement of this proposition, assent to its truth ?
We are told, upon high authority, that the knowledge and power
of man are coincident; that while ignorant of causes he can
produce no effects; that he can conquer nature only by submis-
sion to her laws; that what in speculation stands for the cause,
or rather the principle, is what in practice stands for the rule.
Upon these axioms rests the proposition. And if any one
ventures the denial of this proposition, let him take upon him-
self the burden of proving that knowledge is not power over
nature in agriculture, while it is in every thing else.

But, leaving this general statement, let us come home to
men’s business and bosoms, in a brief analysis of the proposi-
tion. Here is a young man with a strong arm, a clear head,
and a stout heart, eager to enter into a partnership with
nature, in order, by her aid, to obtain certain agricultural pro-
ducts. For this purpose he wishes to select a portion of the
earth’s surface on which he can labor. But it is not every part
of the earth’s surface that will make a good farm. ‘There is a
great variety of soil in the primary, the secondary, the tertiary,
the diluvial, and the alluvial formations on the erust of our
globe, as revealed by geological research. Now, unless he
understands the nature of these formations, and the nature of
the soil connected with them, will he not, before he makes his
selection, find it for his advantage to study the science of
geology in its practical bearing upon agriculture ?

From his farm, judiciously selected, he wishes to raise certain
vegetable products, a3 wheat, or Indian corn, which, with ‘the
least outlay of capital and labor, will yield the largest returns

SCIENCE IN AGRICULTURE. 441

of profit. Now this can be done only by bringing into operas
tion certain laws of vegetable physiology established by nature,
which take the necessary elements from the soil, from the air, -
from the water, and put them into organic vegetable forms. Now
unless he is sure that he understands these laws, will he not
find it for his advantage to study the science of botany in its
relations to agriculture ?

From these vegetable ‘products, he wishes to obtain certain
animal products, whether cattle or swine. To this end he must
apply certain laws of animal physiology, established by nature,
by means of which, elements in vegetable forms may, by the
process of digestion and assimilation, enter into the composi-
tion of animal forms. Now unless he is sure that he thoroughly
understands these laws in their application, would he not find
it for his advantage to study the science of zoology in its prac-
tical bearings on agriculture ?

The products of the soil depend, for their amount and quality,
upon the use of manures, whether vegetable, animal, or saline,
to supply those elements in which the soil is deficient. It is
not every kind of manure that will suit every variety of soil;
but only that kind of manure will suit a given soil, which con-
tains those elements in which the soil is deficient. Evidently,
then, in order to manure land judiciously, the composition, both
of the soil and of the manure, must be known. In order to
this, the laws of analysis and of synthesis, or of decomposition
and composition, must be employed. Now, unless the young
cultivator thoroughly understands these laws, in reference to
the soil itself and the manure to be used, would it not be for
his advantage to study the science of chemistry in its applica-
tion to agriculture ?

The products of the soil depend, for their amount and quality,
on certain appliances of tools and instruments of husbandry.
But the value and efficiency of these tools and instruments, as
the plough, for instance, must depend:on their conformity to
certain laws of mechanical philosophy. Now unless he is sure
that he understands these laws in reference to these tools,
would it not be for his advantage to study mechanical science
in its application to agriculture ?

_ The products of the soil depend, for their amount and quality,
56*

442 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

upon certain laws connected with the agencies of nature, like
heat, light, electricity, frost. Now unless he is sure that he
understands these laws, would he not find it for his advantage
to study the science of meteorology, and natural science in
general, in their relations to agriculture ?

Or, to sum up the whole in a few words, does not intelli-
gence, knowledge, science, pertaining to agriculture, qualify a
man to become a better farmer, just as the knowledge pertain-
ing to his profession, qualifies him who has it to be a better
manufacturer or a better merchant ?

Mr. President—What has made Massachusetts what she is
in wealth, in physical conveniences and home comforts, in spite
of the physical disabilities of a sterile soil and inclement skies ?
To borrow our illustration from what many here are familiar
with, how does it happen that the members of the legislature
whose homes are as far distant as Worcester, can every night en-
joy their domestic comforts, and yet every morning, going at rail-
road speed, be punctually present in their seats, ready to attend
to the first business of the house? To what is it owing, that
in some emergency of business, of joy, or of grief, that they can
receive or transmit intelligence, sent along the telegraphic wires
with the speed of lightning? To what is it owing, that for a
trifling expense, they can, by means of the Daguerreotype pro-
cess, obtain portraits of themselves and their families, faithful-
ly drawn by the unerring finger of light—* offspring of God
first-born?” To what is it owing, that instead of drinking
water, brackish, polluted, it may be, by sewers, or by other
sources of impurity, they can drink the pure Cochituate water,
and feel themselves stronger under its influence, than “a giant
refreshed by wine?” To what is it owing that instead of
lamps and candles, yielding a flickering and uncertain light, just
sufficient to make the darkness visible, requiring frequent snuf-
fing to remove a fungus or a thief, giving forth the odor and
the drippings of whale oil and tallow, they can enjoy the clear
shining light of gas, rivalling the sun in its power to turn night
into day? To what is it owing, that instead of linsey-woolsey,
home-made woollen, and brown tow cloth, and streaked linen, the
princely manufacturers, vying in the beauty of their fabrics
with the merchant princes, who can make their selection from

SCIENCE IN AGRICULTURE. 443

every part of the world, are able to furnish manufactured pro-
ducts at so low a price that they can array their families in a
glory beyond that of Solomon, though, like “ the lillies of the
field, they toil not, neither do they spin.”

To what are all these and cther improvements which adorn
and bless life, owing? They are owing to the application of
science, in conformity with the laws of nature, to the produc-
tions of art.

And is agriculture doomed to be stationary, while the other
arts, with exulting step, are marching in triumph towards per-
fection? Is agriculture, the eldest child of nature, and in
closest connection with her mother, having fed her sister arts,
to be dismissed dowerless, while they are enriched with the
gifts of science ?

But if we look at this subject a little more in detail, we can
more distinctly see the connection there is between the science
of agriculture and the art of agriculture, and the dependence
of the latter on the former.

‘Science informs us that a plant can take from the soil only
the constituents which are in the soil. Now what constituents
are in the soil in any given case science informs us, either from
a consideration of the rocks, by the crumbling and decompo-
sition of which it was originally formed, or by a chemical analy-
sis, or by an analytical examination of the plants or trees which
are spontaneously produced on it. Thus, a soil formed by the
crumbling of a rock of quartz, does not contain much potash,
because it is not in the rock. Ananalysis of the soil leads us to
the same conclusion. So does the natural growth of vegetation
on its surface; as for instance, that of pines, which when ana-
lyzed, is found to contain but little potash. The celebrated
Liebig informed me, that he attaches great practical impor-
tance to the last of these three modes.

It likewise happens that by taking off a certain kind of crop
for a succession of years, the potash which naturally exists in
the soil becomes exhausted. Some fields in Virginia were tul-
tivated a hundred years, it is said, in raising tobacco and wheat.
In that time, it is asserted that twelve hundred pounds of pot-
ash, to the acre, were removed in leaves and stalks in the case
of tobacco, and grain and straw in the case of wheat. The

AAA MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

consequence was, that much of this land had to lie unimproved
in the state of old field, as it is there called, until the potash
is restored by a further decomposition.

I have called your attention to a single constituent, namely,
potash, because it is so well known. What is true of this, is
likewise true of other ingredients of the soil which were
originally imparted to some rocks in larger measure than to
others, but which by continued cropping, are liable to be ex-
hausted.

Here, then, we have certain great principles of the science
of agriculture, in this brief statement, and you ask me what
practical use can be made of these principles, or in other words,
what rules can be deduced from them to be applied to the art of
farming ?

In reply, I would say, that from these principles we deduce
rules for your guidance, like the following :—

1. Raise that kind of crop, the mineral ingredients of which
are found in the original soil, as for instance, raise wheat on
soil that originally contained potash and the phosphate of lime
or magnesia.

2. When a soil has lost, by cultivation, the quality of fertility
which it once had, let it lie fallow with the expectation that it
will, by the decomposition of the fragments of rock in the soil,
recover its fertility.

3. Ina case like the last, you may plough deep in order to
bring up to the air fresh portions of soil which have not thus
been exhausted. Thus the edges of the dirt thrown out from
a ditch, often show more fertility than the field generally.

4, When a field has lost its power of producing one kind of
crop, try another kind which does not demand largely that
particular clement in the soil which is exhausted. Thus, a soil
that has been exhausted by raising tobacco, may produce a
large crop of beans, which does not require potash to be in
the soil.

5..Or, to generalize the last rule, adopt a rotation of crops.

6. In your endeavors to recruit the soil, be careful to ascer-
tain the particular ingredient in which it is deficient, and then
supply that ingredient.

Thus far, I have called your attention to the original mineral

SCIENCH IN AGRICULTURE. 445

soil, as it was formed by the decomposition of the rocks,
whether changed or not from its place by diluvial or alluvial
action. Inow proceed to speak of the modification which it
has experienced from the decay of vegetable and animal sub-
stances on the surface, forming what is called mould.

Originally the earth had none of this mould on its surface.
The first races of vegetables derived their nourishment from a
purely mineral soil, from water, and the air. From this soil
they obtained their potash, their silex, their magnesia, their
lime, their phosphorous, their ammonia. From the water they
obtained their hydrogen. From the air they derived their car-
bon, existing in a free state or connected with water. Thus
they grew, and when they died and decayed, the elements which
composed them were united to the mineral soil to afford nour-
ishment for the next generation of vegetables. Animals, sub-
- sisting as they do directly or indirectly upon vegetables, take
the elements which compose their bodiés chiefly from their food,
and, in their life and in their death, bestow these elements on
the soil. In this way provision is made by the Creator for
greatly enriching the earth.

The difference between the mould on the surface and the soil
below is, that mould contains decayed vegetable and animal
matter. The quality of this matter must depend on the quan-
tity of the vegetable and animal substances of which it is
formed. For instance, that which is formed by the decay of ma-
ple wood must differ from that which is formed by the decay of
pine wood.

Now one other general fact, or law, or principle, discovered’
by science is, that in some soils, vegetable and animal sub-
stances, if buried so far below the surface that the air does not
get access to them, remain organic, and they are not converted
into a form in which they can nourish plants.

Another general principle or fact discovered by science, is
that decayed animal and vegetable matter in the soil, is nearly
insoluble in cold water, and, therefore, is not carried off by the
rain, and does not sink into the earth.

Still another general principle or fact discovered by science is,
that this decayed animal.and vegetable matter is liable to be

446 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

exhausted by crops and requires to be replenished by returning
to the soil the ingredients which may have been removed.

You ask what use can be made of these principles discovered
by science? In reply, I would say, that they are the founda-
tion of rules like the following :—

1. If there are undecomposed vegetable or animal sub-
stances in the soil, expose them sufficiently to the air by plough-
ing or otherwise; or

2. Mix with the soil alkalies or manures that will hasten
the decay of these subtances, in order that they may be reduced
to that form of matter which will nourish vegetation.

3. Stir the mould as frequently as possible while the crop
is growing, in order that the air may come in contact with
decayed vegetable and animal matter for the production of car-
bonic acid to nourish the plants.

4. Adapt the manure which you put upon the soil to the
particular kind of crop which you intend to raise. Thus a few
pounds of bone manure might, in a given case, by furnishing
phosphate of lime, be of more service for a crop of wheat, than
any quantity of other manure which does not contain that
ingredient.

5. When you find that a particular kind of manure has lost
the power which it once had in recruiting the soil, do not
attempt to make up in quantity what it has lost in power, but
rather try some other kind of manure.

6. In forming beds of manure, bring together substances
that are so related to each other that their chemical constitu-
ents will, in union, form the appropriate food for the particular
crop which you wish to raise.

But besides the study of the original soil, and of mould on
the surface, it is of great importance to the young farmer to
study the laws of the plants which he raises, as they are devel-
oped in the science of vegetable physiology.

The great object of agriculture is to produce, in the most
advantageous way, certain qualities, or a maximum size of cer-
tain organs or parts of particular plants. Now this object can
be obtained only by supplying the condition necessary to their
production. In wheat, we want the greatest size, number and
excellence of the seed; in the potato, of the root. We cultivate

SCIENCE IN AGRICULTURE. 447

the rose for the flower, the oak for the stem, the apple for the
envelop of the seed, flax for the bark, the mulberry for the
leaf.

Now in these several cases, it is evident that the modes of
cultivation must differ so as to correspond with the several pro-
ducts sought for. Thus the mode of cultivation employed for
the purpose of procuring fine, pliable straw of wheat for Leg-
horn bonnets, must differ very much from that which is adopted
in order to produce a maximum of grain of the same plant. In-
dependently of other conditions, the food has great influence
on the products generated bya plant. Charcoal powder, when
given as food to a goose, produces an excessive enlargement of
the liver. Vegetable mould, largely supplied to potatoes when
growing, produces an abundance of starch, and makes them
mealy. Strong animal manure, on the other hand, diminishes the
quantity of starch, and makes them soapy. A large supply of
water applied to rice, when growing, makes the berry firm for
hulling; a diminished supply makes it brittle.

It is another general fact or law in the vegetable kingdom,
that like produces like, there being, however, a gradual improve-
ment or a gradual degeneracy, according to the conditions
attending the cultivation. There are indeed occasional excep-
tions to this law of descent, when varieties are produced,
whose characteristics also descend in obedience to the general
law.

Another general fact or law in vegetable physiology, estab-
lished by science, is, that if the pollen of the flower of any
species be introduced into a flower of the same species, but of
a different variety, the seeds from this flower will give a plant
of a different variety still, that is, of a third variety.

There is another general fact or principle established by
science, that plants can be acclimated, namely, taught to flourish
and bear fruit in climates north or south of their original
habitation. Thus, Indian corn, and the potato, by being culti-
vated north of their original homes have been improved, the one
in the seed, and the other in the root, though the growth of the
stalk may be somewhat impaired.

Do you ask what use can be made of these laws or princi-
ples, established by science in vegetable physiology, as the

448 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

foundation of rules in practical agriculture? In reply I would
say :—

1. Seek with great care for seed of the best varieties of
plants, with the expectation that the qualities of the plant will
descend.

2. Take great care in selecting and preserving the seed from
your owncrops. In this way one of my acquaintances, in the
course of twenty-five years, doubled the size of his Tuscarora
corn. In this way, Baden in Maryland, obtained his cele-
brated corn, on one stalk of which I once saw ten ears. This
improvement was accomplished in twenty years by selecting
his seed annually from those stalks which bore the greatest
number of ears.

3. When you wish to unite the excellencies of different varie-
ties, as size and productiveness, place them near each other,
that through the pollen of one flower and the stigma of another
flower, they may be influenced to form new varieties. Thus
Prince, at Flushing, brought the Spanish chestnut near the
chinkapin of our own country, that the pollen of the one
might fall into the flower of the other, and thus he obtained a
new variety, which had nearly the size of the one and the pro-
ductiveness of the other.

4. When you wish to cultivate a plant whose home is in a
southern climate, do not be discouraged because you find a
difficulty in bringing it to perfection in our shorter summers.
By perseverance you can hasten the period of maturity. Thus
one of my acquaintance, by care, continued through thirty years,
hastened the ripening of the Lima bean full two weeks.

'

SOIL ANALYSIS. 449

SOTTRANALYSTS:

From an Address before the Hampshire, Franklin
and Hampden Society, Oct. 12th, 1853.

BY WILLIAM 8. KING.

We are all agreed that farming ought to pay, whether it does
or not; and further, that it may be made to pay. The ques-
tion now is, how it may be made to pay? I answer: By rais-
ing maximum crops, at the minimum of cost to the owner and
to his soil.

The agricultural statistics of Rhode Island, (which State, as
I have remarked, is the only one whose agricultural statistics
are complete and reliable,) show that the largest yield of carrots
in the State, in the year 1850, (a bad year for root crops, by
the way, because of the drought,) was one thousand bushels to
the acre; while the average yield was four hundred bushels,
and the least, amounted to seventy-five bushels, all told. Of
onions, the largest crop was six hundred bushels; the average,
four hundred; and the smallest, one hundred bushels, to the
acre. Of Indian corn, the largest yield per acre was one hun-
dred bushels; the average, thirty and a half bushels; and the
least, six. Of rye, the largest crop grown on an acre was forty
bushels; the average was twelve and three-quarters; and the
smallest was—what think ye ?—just three bushels!

Now, gentlemen, though we can easily see that it will well
pay to gather these maximum crops, if economically produced,
we can scarcely believe that they more than make the two ends
of the year meet, who raise but the average; while how the
wolf is kept from the door of those who persist in getting such
crops as six bushels of corn, or three bushels of rye, passes our
comprehension. Three bushels of rye! Six bushels of corn!
Why, they will scarce suffice to feed the mice, that “most do
congregate” in the granaries of such thriftless farmers.

We are, of course, aware that all soils are not able to grow
one hundred bushels of corn to the acre, and other crops in
proportion. But they are very poor specimens of land that
will not, with good tillage, yield more than the averages above
stated. Indeed, so far is it, in most instances, from being the

57*

450 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

fault of the land, that I feel safe in asserting that, on an ex-
change of farms, the three-bushel farmer would, in a majority of
cases, bring the land whereon was raised the forty bushels of
rye, down to the average, in about the same time that the forty
bushel farmer would require to raise his bad bargain up to the
average.

In order to grow maximum crops economically, many things
are necessary to be known, and many things to be done. I
shall take up these requirements, and do to each what justice
the limits of my time and your patience will permit.

In entering on a farm, the first things that a judicious farmer
ought to ascertain are: the component parts of his soil and
subsoil, and of the crops that he proposes to raise. These last
may be learned from books; but the other items of knowledge
must be obtained from an analysis of the soil; and it would be
folly, as well as rank cowardice to deny, that the importance—
nay, the very value in the smallest degree—of soil analysis is
a matter now seriously questioned by some able men; as it is
also ignorantly ridiculed by many simple ones.

That such knowledge is valuable and necessary, stands to
reason. For plants, like men, to grow, to live, must feed; and
this sustenance must come from the earth, or from the air, or
from both. What nourishment the air contributes is very
generally agreed upon; and, the earth supplying the rest, it
becomes a matter of no little interest and importance to ascer-
tain the state of the larder. If chemistry, through an analysis
of soil, is not competent to this, we can not, otherwise, learn it.

Again, soils oftentimes contain noxious ingredients that im-
pede the growth, or even affect the life of plants. These, when
ascertained, may be neutralized and made harmless; or, as
frequently happens, be rendered, in some other combinations,
positively beneficial to vegetation. a

The opposition of so many farmers to the application of
chemistry—a science capable of doing them so much good and
no harm—has ever been to me a matter of surprise. Let us
now consider the objections.

The first objection raised against the value of soil analysis is:
That in so great a quantity, as is the soil, comparatively, it is
impossible to discover atoms so small as are many of the con-

SOIL ANALYSIS. 451

stituents, whose presence or absence would cause it to be pro-
ductive or sterile, as the case might be. In other, and plainer
words, because it appears improbable, it is called impossible.

This is a singular argument to use in this age of the world,
when every day exhibits its miracle; and the fingers of Clio,
the Muse of History, ache with recording the triumphs of
Science! When Jenner announced that Vaccination was a pre-
servative against smallpox, the entire medical nose of Europe
was upturned in derision. Wise men said it was puerile to
expect so great a result from so inadequate and unphilosophical
a cause. Pious men rolled up the whites of their eyes, and
pronounced it sin, to set up the teat of a peaceful cow as a
protection from the scourge of God. Conservative men called
it “a new doctrine ;” and, with this unanswerable argument,
set it away among humbugs. A woman—to the honor of the
sex be it declared—(the Lady Mary Wortley Montague) thought
it could be tried; and who, now, denies what the wise men,
and the pious men, and the conservative men of the last century
declared to be impossible ?

You cannot, for instance, (say the opponents of soil analysis, )
find, and properly estimate the lime where it exists, as is often
the case, in the proportion of thirty pounds of lime, to two mil-
lion pounds of soil on an acre. This statement of the case
would appear more startling to me, who am more of an annalist
than an analyzer, were the former feats of science unknown to
me. But when I know that the eyes of science have seen a
star, so distant from our globe that its light, jogging along at
the gentle pace of two hundred thousand miles in a second,
consumes more than three thousand years in coming from home,
hither ; when I know how far sighted she is, | am prepared to
believe that she may be gifted with a nicety of touch, to finger,
weigh and appreciate any atom, however small. When science
can read the decrees of God, before they are promulgated, (as
when foretelling eclipses and the approach of the erratic comet, )
it is not overtasking credulity to declare, that she can discover
the component parts of a piece of dirt, taken in the hand to be
examined at leisure.

But we are told, with an air of ill-concealed triumph, that
men eminent for their scientific acquirements, have pronounced

452 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

the analysis of the soil, in the present state of chemical
science, to be of little or no practical value to the farmer.
Well, men sometimes ascend the hill of science to sucha height,
that they do not see objects palpable to others, who stand
below the mist-clouds that always envelop its summit. Thus
Dr. Dionysius Lardner had proved, to his own private satisfae-
tion, and that of his school, the impossibility of navigating the
Atlantic with steam, when he was roused from his reverie by
the signal guns of the “Sirius,” as, unimpeded by the conclu-
sions of the philosopher, she sailed into the bay of New York.

Then, again, scientific men of equal eminence have declared
it to be an invaluable and an indispensable aid to the farmer;
and “who shall decide when doctors disagree?” When men
of high scientific attainments and unimpeachable character
assure us that an analysis of our soil, sufficiently accurate for
all practical purposes, can be made, and is made, we are war-
ranted in overlooking the denials of many others. Indeed, it
appears to me, froma glance at the array of authorities on
either side, that the opponents of soil analysis, are chiefly men
of the closet; while its friends are, not only men of equal
standing as chemists, but withal, practical agriculturists.

For my single self, Iam not ashamed to believe with such
men as Liebig, Boussingault, Johnston and others, in Europe;
and with Charles T. Jackson, Norton, Mapes, Enderlin, Porter,
Horsford, and many more, in our own land.

The second objection urged against the value of an analysis
of your soil, is, that the quality of the soil on different parts
of the same farm, and often on the same field, greatly varies.

This, at first sight, seems plausible; but we know that the
chief variation is in the proportionate quantities of sand, clay,
&c., and it is not with these, that the analyst has chiefly to do.
Allowing alumina (clay) and silex (sand) to constitute ninety
per cent. of any soil, in any proportion; it is rather with the
remaining ten per cent. that the chemist deals. And the soil
of a farm that has been in the same hands for a course of
years—every field subjected, as is usual, to the same treatment
in rotation—will be found to be very similar, one field to
another, in all respects other than a predominance of clay, or
sand, or the like.

SOIL ANALYSIS. 453

The “Scioto Valley lands,” are often summoned as witnesses
against the value of analysis. These soils are extremely fer-
tile, and are apparently inexhaustible,—having yielded immense
crops of corn for twenty years in succession; yet when ana-
lyzed, are found to be very similar in their constituents to
comparatively sterile soils in Massachusetts ;—the chief differ-
ence being the greater pulverulence of the Scioto soil, which is
like to ashes for fineness of its particles.

Two neighbors—farmers—agreed to carry through the
winter, as an experiment, a dozen head of cattle, each, on a
given quantity of hay of similar quality. The one cut his hay
fine, and fed out to his cattle regularly, as their wants required.
These cattle thrived, and spring found them sleek and hearty.
‘Farmer Two turned out his herd to supply themselves, as best
they could, from a well-settled old hay-stack. The hungry
beasts gnawed at the stack steadily ;

«They fell upon what’er was offered—like
A priest, a shark, an alderman, a pike,”

at times getting their fill; and, at times, gaining new appetite
from their exertions. These, also, survived the winter, but
they were gaunt, hide-bound, and wretched.

Farmer Two, of course, found fault with the hay; but we
opine that the difference lay in the mode of feeding. And so
we say of Scioto Valley lands. The soil is pulverulent—the
food is chopped up—and always ready in the best state for the
demands of the crop; while in Massachusetts, the tender
rootlet is forced to contend for its food; now with a rock;
and with a little less hard-hearted lump of soil, that gives
grudgingly, and only on compulsion.

We have now stated two—and those the most serious—of
the objections taken to the value of soil analysis; and have
given our “reasons for the faith that is in us,” of its impor-
tance. To show its bearing upon farming operations would
cumber this address, and consume more time than any of us
would willingly now spare. Let it suffice, now, to say that—
its value conceded—it becomes the prime counsellor of the
farmer in his ploughing, and in his manuring; it tells whether
or not, and in what way best, to disturb the subsoil; whether

454 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

its incorporation with the surface soil is desirable; what, if
any, applications are needed to render innocuous, or even
beneficial, deleterious substances that may exist in the soil.
The constituents of the desired crop being ascertained, it
enables us to decide what aliment will be required, and to dis-
cover whether or not the food is in the soil, and in sufficient
quantities, and if not, to supply it.

AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENTS.

From an Address before the Hampshire Society, Oct. 26,1853.

BY REY. F. D. HUNTINGTON.

The main oversight of the recent efforts at improvement has
been a too hasty generalization, and a deficiency in patient
painstaking, accurate records of experiment. A few brilliant
announcements have dazzled our eyes; sanguine lips have trum-
peted abroad spurious maxims; and the golden age of great
profits and easy times has been heard knocking at the doors.
Following the explosion of this sophistry is apt to come a re-
action of discouragement, as unreasonable as the flattery. What
the interests of your profession seem to me to be imperatively
demanding just now, therefore, will be two things: 1. The
most rigid and thorough experiment, as to every detail and
particular of every mode of tillage, enriching and renewing of
lands, breeding of stock, and new implements, taking into ac-
count all the most minute and variable conditions, data and cir-
cumstances, attending that experiment: and 2. A faithful, exact,
and systematized registration of every such experiment, in-
cluding specific statements as to all the particulars alluded to.
This is that second stage, following the era of general discovery,
which agricultural improvement has next to pass through; a
period of thorough experiment, and scrupulous registration.
Till we have the tests and tables only thus to be furnished, we
have no rational induction, and of course no development of
principles that will give us a proper science. The more exten-
sive and diversified these expcriments on a given question are,

AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENTS. 455

throughout the country, the sounder your basis for an induction.
Then let these records, bearing the stamp of more precision
than is common in county reports hitherto, duly and responsibly
authenticated, be brought together and collated by competent
hands,—and you have got a body not of theories but of facts,—
facts that will justify a broad and impregnable generalization,
fit to be published, and constituting a noble contribution to
substantial science.

One prime difficulty that will attend these processes will be
an inadequate sense of the liability to deception. If you would
meet those enemies to real advancement from which the farmer
has already suffered so much,—careless statements and half-
established conclusions,—you must bring into the field exact
weights and measures, exact observations of climate and
weather, exact attention to every element that may influence
the result. Such credulous rules of evidence as suffice for tea-
table gossip, or stories of table-rappings, will not answer.
There must be a search for disturbing causes, not on one side
only, but on all sides. Ifthe case is one pertaining to an out-
door crop, like wheat, for instance, consider the variety of ele-
ments youhave got to watch and include in your report. There
is, first, the quality, species and pedigree of the seed sown; there
is the time of sowing; there is not only the composition of the
soil, but its mechanical preparation, its comminution by plough
and harrow, its situation as regards exposure to the sun, latitude,
springs of water, and the antecedent crops taken from it; then
there is the whole subject of manures, as to ingredients, condi-
tion, amount, and mode and time of application; then the direct
treatment of the crop on the ground; the cost of labor; then
the subtle and fugitive meteorological changes; then the relation
of the growth to diseases; still further, there is the harvesting
threshing, and winnowing,—for it has lately been ascertamed
that wheat subjected to one of the new machines, though fair in
appearance, loses somehow a portion of its germinating, or re-
productive power; and finally, not only the measurement but
the weight of the yield,—for, as .you know, wheat of the same
apparent plumpness ranges over a difference of five or ten
pounds’ weight to the bushel. Now, it is not till you have
brought into your registration each of these twenty-three speci-

456 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

fications that you can be said to have furnished returns of this
crop of wheat. There is not one of them, which a thorough-
bred scientific manipulator, if the case were transferred to the
laboratory, would not despise himself for leaving out.

The same necessity for thoroughness exists in all other
branches of the business. When you take up a lump of pre-
mium butter, you have hold of what seems to be a very simple,
home-made fact, and a very pleasant one. But this fact has an
antecedent biography,—and before the oily cake has slipped
through your fingers, or elsewhere, if you are a good farmer,
and a good Yankee, you have at least a dozen questions to ask
about it,—how the fact has come to be,—all the way from the
cow and the cow’s mother, and grandparents, on to the toast.
You want a written natural history of this lump, ab ovo usque
ad malum.

Nor is farming singular, in this respect, among the sciences.
Look at the nicety of astronomical calculations. Look at the
minute mixtures of the chemist. Look at the hair-balances,
and tests of exquisite delicacy, in every philosophical apparatus.
Observe the most awful precision exacted in clinical surgery.
Furnish a Herschell’s discoveries without the achromatic lens
and infallible mountings of his telescope and siderial clock,
with the horizontal and vertical adjustments of transit instru-
ments, air-bubble and spider-lines; conceive of a Bergman’s or
Faraday’s analyses, without atomic weights and unimpeachable
tables and mathematical proportions, and you may expect a
perfectly intelligent agriculture without this sharp inspection,
and these unquestionable statistics. Why should you desire
exemption from them? They are what invest your calling with
its lasting interest,—its intellectual charm. They furnish the
sort of fascination that is likely to pique and attract the curi-
osity of bright young men. I can even imagine a man’s having
his sleep broken, his pulse accelerated, and his nerves in tension,
while he watches for the impending result of one of these elabo-
rate and exciting experiments, like the issue of some well-
matched game.

I have spoken of the need of these tentative processes. J
appeal to your own experience. There are few of that more
progressive class of farmers that form societies, and arrange

AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENTS. 457

exhibitions, like this, who have not some time been victims of
crude statements. Indeed, it is quite extraordinary how many
of what are now the prominent subjects, most interesting and
most discussed, relating to practical husbandry, remain from
year to year open and undecided questions, with about as much
said on one side as the other; when nothing is wanted but
trials enough and attention enough to settle them peremptorily.
In Massachusetts alone, there are farmers enough at work, if
they would continue their observations, to determine any of
them in two seasons. Make what allowance you will for that
wide margin of uncertainty that always hangs about a business
so dependent on seasons and weather, still, I say, Nature,
reverentially and resolutely studied, never cheats her disciples.
Find her laws, and, rely upon it, they never will miscarry. You
have only to talk with your neighbors, or turn over the files of
any agricultural journal, to find examples of what I refer to.
What universal rules have been established, for instance, as to:
the mode of applying manures! Yet why should there not be
rules, for all cases, as much as for the silversmith in mingling
metals, or the apothecary drugs? Subsoiling has been preached
for some five years past, both here and in England, as the Co-
lumbus discovery of modern tillage, revealing to every farmer
a new territory underneath his cultivated one; you are pointed
to Lord John Russell's turnips, and the Rackheath wheat. But.
does the practice actually apply as well to New England as
Old? Is there an offset to its benefits in later crops and more
exposure to frost? What are its relations to under-drainage ?
Does it relieve wet lands, or render them more hopelessly
soaked and spongy? Is it equally good for a dry, friable soil
on a sand-hill, as I have seen to be true in one case, or is it
any better than the common deep ploughing as they practise it
in Surrey and some parts of Yorkshire? Now what I affirm
is, that each of these queries ought to have one, definite, indis-
putable, experimental answer, recorded where it can be got at;
an answer put beyond the region of conjecture, and rooted in
authenticated facts.

Again, of the application of lime, the preconceptions of
chemical theory would seem to promise that it belongs only to
non-caleareous soils; yet does not experience show instances

58*

458 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

=

where a calcareous soil has been specially fertilized by carbon-
ate of lime? And if so, what are the conditions that generate
the anomalous result ?

Again, within two months, I have seen in a single number of
a popular agricultural periodical, two communications, both in
avery positive tone, taking precisely opposite grounds on the
question whether, in salting hay, the salt may be thrown on the
top of the mow and left to inter-penetrate the mass, or must
be cast into each separate forkful, or layer, as the hay is
pitched from the cart.

Again, the Deerfield farmers, in this State, close by the cele-
brated residence of Henry Colman too, dispute one another to
this day, as to the value of the “old tore,” to a grass crop;
some of them insisting that it helps the next yield, and others,
that it is better to keep the sward close.

Or, once more, what is the right law of producing fertilizing
agents? Must we continue the old fashion of spending the
winter in feeding out all that we spend the summer in gather-
ing in, copying the circle of the snake that swallows his tail,
or is there some better way? And will more be gained by
following the famous aphorism of the Earl of Leicester, “ The
more meat a ploughing farmer sends to Smithfield, the more
corn he may sell at Mark Lane,” or by raising young cattle ?

Now what may be asserted of each of these mooted points
is, not that every one of you may not have an opinion upon it,
and be very sure he is right; but that his next door neighbor
is likely to have an opposite opinion; whereas, both being
reducible by experiment to fact, there ought to be, not opinions,
but knowledge. The conditions of a given result ought to be
as clearly determined as the oxidation in electro-magnetic
machinery, combustion under a steam-engine, or the proportions
of chlorine and hydrogen in thirty-seven pounds of muriatic
acid. In looking over the reports of the several county socie-
ties for the last year, I see complaints on half the pages of
non-compliance with the rules of the committees in reference to
accurate returns.. One reason, I suppose, is, that a farmer
begins the season with no idea of competing, and therefore
keeps no record; but unexpectedly finding Nature has fa-
vored him with a remarkable product, he takes it to the exhi-

STUDY OF SOILS. 459

bition, hoping his blunder will not forfeit his chance. This
suggests whether it would not be well worth while, not only to
withhold the premium on account of the omission, but to estab-
lish a separate prize for the best method and most accurate
specimen, in reporting the whole internal history and transac-
tions of the husbandry of the year.

To this end, that he may be his own professor, scholar, sec-
retary, and reporter, let every farmer have as complete an
apparatus as he can afford, for conducting his examinations,
and nice admeasurements. Then let him enter his daily record,
with special respect for arithmetic. Let him keep a running
debt and credit account with every acre of his land, as much
as with his blacksmith and grocer, and post his books. This
will sharpen his wits, double his relish, and shed a steady intel-
lectual irradiation through his whole employment.

S FG,DiXg, OF 8. O08).
From an Address before the Franklin Society, Oct. 1, 1853.

BY DR. DANIEL LEE.

Suppose I were to investigate a fair sample of the arated
soil of this county, and compare it with the soil in western
New York, which produces the largest crops grown in the
United States, what, think you, would be the essential differ-
ence between the two? It may be presumptuous in me to
hazard an opinion on so important a question on general prin-
ciples, without a special examination of the land in this region.
But you have the old red sand stone here precisely as it is
found in the District of Columbia; you have soft water here as
it is there; and your land here as it is there, is better adapted
to corn than wheat. During the last six years I have had
ample opportunities for the critical study of the freestone and
granite soils of the South, as I had previously to investigate
the limestone soils of Western New York.

When rain water passes through the latter, and appears in
wells and springs, it is uniformly charged with salts of lime |

460 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

and magnesia; and it rarely fails to contain salts of soda and
potash in sensible quantities. Take a gallon of your well water
and evaporate it to dryness, and it will not often yield more
than a half grain of carbonate of lime; while a gallon of well
water in Monroe County, on our best wheat soils, contains fif-
teen grains of carbonate of lime, and ten grains of the sulphate
or gypsum. It also contains from five to ten grains of epsom
salts, or sulphate of magnesia, several grains of common salt,
particularly on the Onondaga Salt Group, which extend from
Madison County through Onondaga, Cayuga, Wayne, Monroe,
Orleans, Niagara, and some distance into Canada. It is the
various salts which abound in the earths and rocks of Western
New York, that impart to its soil unequalled agricultural capa-
bilities; and yet I have analyzed more than a hundred samples
of the richest farming lands in that region, and never found
over two per cent. of lime in any soil. When you see 100
pounds of gypsum applied to an acre, add a ton of clover hay
to a crop in a year, although this salt of lime applied as a fer-
tilizer, adds only one part in 20,000 to the soil, estimated to
the depth of only ten inches, you have demonstrated the great
value of a little of “the salt of the earth,’ where it is really
needed. In a like manner, the salts of ammonia, and phos-
phates of lime, soda, magnesia and potash, found in guano, de-
monstrate, in the most satisfactory manner, the extraordinary
power of a very little food of plants in augmenting their growth
upon poor land. Under favorable circumstances, 100 pounds
of Peruvian guano add from 400 to 600 pounds of merchant-
able shelled corn to the crop. To understand how so little
manure produces so large a result, we must bear in mind that
in 100 pounds of the seeds of maize there are 97 pounds of
carbon and the elements of water, and only 3 pounds of the
constituents that impart peculiar value to guano.

It is not because wheat plants extract any considerable
amount of lime from the soil that limestone lands are uniformly
the best for this grain. A reasonable amount of the calcareous
element enables stable manure to produce more than it would
without any lime in the soil. This is a curious fact, but I am
unable to state the minimum quantity of lime that will suffice
for all useful purposes. I am confident that two per cent. is

STUDY OF SOILS. 461

the maximum quantity needed to grow wheat under the most
favorable auspices; but whether one part in 100, or one in 500
or 1,000 will answer equally well I have never been able to
satisfy myself. So far as my observatioas have extended, all
farming lands that yield soft spring and well water need lime;
and they very often lack other ingredients quite as much, which
the application of lime will not supply.

In studying soils it is important to bear in mind that while
common stable manure is rarely worth over a dollar a ton, good
guano is worth fifty times that sum for the same weight. There
are thousands of farmers who are now making three barrels of
wheat, or five of corn from one of manure; and when the cream
of the best soils shall become an article of commerce, as I hope
it soon will, you may look for a revolution in New England
agriculture. You can hasten a material change for the better
by encouraging careful and reliable experiments in the feeding
of all plants and animals grown in Massachusetts; or you may
prevent such change by opposing the establishment of an ex-
perimental farm in the State. Beyond all question, tillage and
husbandry embrace many experimental arts, and many experi-
mental sciences; and I believe that it is just as easy in a long
run, to draw the food of annual crops from ten to twenty feet
below the surface of the ground, as from ten to twenty inches. |
The earthy matter that enriches your creek and river flats came
from deep ravines, hillside-gullies and mountain-gorges, and not
mostly from the surface of uplands. Clay washed from one
hundred feet below the surface, and distributed as mud and
sediment, over meadows and pastures, rarely fails to enrich
them. Witnessing the good effects of such deposits, I am ex-
pecting to rejuvenate a farm that was worn out by tobacco
culture before the Revolution, mainly by bringing the deep sub-
soil to the surface, and depositing it in gently flowing muddy
water. On every square yard of our land there falls about a
ton of water in twelve months. A few thousand tons of water
falling on the tops of hills on one’s farm are no mean mechani-
cal power for spreading the most fertile substances which the
farmer can command, over all the ground below. Agricultural
mechanics and engineering are in their infancy; and I confess
to you my anxiety to see them cultivated in New England,

462 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

where I am confident they may add four-fold to the intrinsic
and marketable value of your farming lands. All the elements
of fertility that make your best flats worth $200 or $300 an
acre, exist in the atmosphere, in rain water, and in the earths of
all uplands, hills and mountains. These abound more or less in
agricultural salts such as I have briefly referred to in calling your
attention to the most productive lands in the Union. While I
doubt not you would find it profitable to purchase guano, lime,
gypsum, ashes and bone dust, to a certain extent, yet were I
farming here I should rely mainly on irrigation, and elements
derived from the earth below the soil, and from the atmos-
phere. While endeavoring to accumulate the essential elements
of crops in the soil as a permanent investment, capable of yield-
ing a good interest, I should sell nothing but air off my farm in
the shape of choice butter and the very little earthy matter in
the bones and flesh of fat pigs and steers. If I were to burn
an ounce or pound of pure butter before you, no ashes or in-
combustible part would remain. As butter, lard and tallow
may be changed into vapor and gas, it is an important question
in farm economy how one can best transform vapor and gas
into butter, lard and tallow, by the wise use of poor land.
How, think you, the atoms of starch in this potato were formed
from carbon and water? Although starch, oil and sugar con-
tain no earthy matter, yet to organize these substances some-
thing more than vegetable life, carbon, and water seems to be
necessary.

Finding that half of the ash left on burning a potato, was
pure potash, and that new ground, rich in leaf mould, is much
better than old land, from which the soluble alkalies have been
washed and leached, or removed in crops, for the production
of this tuber, and plants rich in oil and sugar, I was induced to
experiment, several years ago, on the value of potash in organ-
izing starch, sugar, and oil. In the seeds of wheat, there are
six times more of this alkali than of lime; and the same is
true, I believe, of all oil-bearing seeds, and of the ash of plants
that yield much sugar. How far soda may take the place of
potash, or magnesia that of lime, in the economy of vegetables,
is a matter to be decided by future researches. Soils compara-
tively rich in alkalies, produce the largest growth of forest

STUDY OF SOILS. 463

trees, particularly hickory, sugar-maple, elm, oak, and beech}
and they often abound in grape vines.

The pot and pearl ashes, made from a ten or twenty acre
clearing in Western New York, frequently sell for enough to
pay the whole cost of felling the timber, cutting and burning
it, and preparing the ground for a crop. I never saw any good
land that was not rich in potash, and how to extract it from
mountains, hills, and valleys, for agricultural purposes, is a
problem to which I have devoted some attention. It must be
done by water, and applied to land byirrigation. All the salts
of the ocean are well known fertilizers dissolved in water;
and if it were practicable to irrigate a farm with sea-water
once a year, guano, which is derived from fish and the ocean,
would never be needed.

Such irrigation would soon render the granitic soils of New
England not unlike those of the Onondaga Salt Group of West-
ern New York. At no very remote period sea-water will be
evaporated in tropical climates to obtain immense quantities
of compound salts required to impart fertility to islands and
continents. Oysters and other shell-fish and corals find an in-
exhaustible supply of lime in the water of the ocean. Wheth-
er you study its minerals, its vegetables, or its animals, it is
found to be a vast reservoir of manure.

Farmers should take enlarged and comprehensive views of
their calling. The resources of nature are unlimited; and we
have only to learn ways, and provide means for the wise use
and successful application of those elements of power and
wealth which everywhere surround us. Agricultural meteorol-
ogy teaches us that under a temperature of 73° to 75° Fahr.
solar heat will raise sixty-five thousand tons of water in a day
from the surface of a lake two miles square. The mechanical
power of this heat may be better appreciated, when I inform
you that ten steam-engines of 200 horse-power each could
barely raise that quantity of water between 300 and 400 feet
in 24 hours. Heat radiated from the sun is the true source of
all the water-power in the world; as it is also the true source
of all the steam-power, whether generated by the combustion
of coal, wood, or alcohol in a spirit lamp. The mechanical
force developed in human muscles, and those of your horses

464 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

and oxen, has a similar origin. Farmers should study solar
heat and sunshine. You have seen corn planted in cold wet
ground, rot instead of growing in the spring. You have seen
it grow feebly, turn pale and yellow, because the earth was
cold; and you have seen other corn where the ground was
warm, exhibit a deep green color, and grow rapidly. Now,
what relation does the growth of this plant bear to the tem-
perature of the soil? Until recently, vegetable physiologists
believed, from their limited observations, that the increase of
vegetable organization was in the ratio of the increase of tem-
perature, under the circumstances named. But the recent re-
searches of M. Quetelet, perpetual Secretary of the Academy
of Science, Brussels, on the climate of Belgium, have shown
that the increase of growth is as the square of the increase of
temperature in the soil. If acorn plant adds three grains to
its weight in 48 hours with the earth in which it grows 15°
above freezing, it will add twelve grains to its weight in the
same length of time, if the temperature of the soil be raised
to 30° above freezing. These facts show you the great im-
portance of investigating the temperature of soils. By allow-
ing our agricultural plants to extend their roots into cold earth
that needs under-draining, we diminish our crops of grain,
English grasses, roots and fruits, one-half, and gain nothing.
Water that drains from soils, and that which collects in low
grounds and swamps, is valuable for irrigation. It sometimes
contains acid salts, or vegetable acids injurious to crops; but
by adding a little lime to such water before it is applied to
grass land, these acids are corrected, and the calcareous water
may be regarded as a weak solution of manure.

By draining and irrigation you may impart a degree of life
and growth to vegetation not attainable in any other way.
Where it is necessary, water must be lifted by pumps worked
by horse-power or steam. Occasionally water-power may be
had; and I have seen wind wheels drive pumps very success-
fully. Engineering has done much for agriculture by construct-
ing canals and railways; but it is destined to do vastly more
by the construction of valuable and lasting improvements on
our farms. They are soon to be regarded as manufacturing
establishments. We do not make crops, or pork, or beef, or

-

FARM ACCOUNTS. 465

butter from nothing. <A first rate cow gives 24 quarts of milk
in as many hours; and in the production of this article, a
pound, or a pint, is formed every thirty minutes from her blood.
The living machinery by which her food is digested, taken up
by vessels, and finally transformed into milk rich in butter,
cheese and sugar, is not generally understood by farmers. If
this machinery were properly studied, the six million cows now
‘kept in the United States would soon be replaced by improved
races that would yield an average of fifty per cent. more milk
from the same quantity of food now consumed. The dairy cow
which elaborates the most milk, butter and cheese from any
given amount of grass, roots or grain, is the one that deserves
the highest premium; not the cow which produces the most
milk in a week or month, regardless of the quantity of food
consumed. By awarding premiums on this principle, you wil

soon learn the exact relations that subsist between a ton of
green grass eaten by a first rate milker and the required pro

duct in milk and butter. Few know how much good pork or
beef 100 pounds of corn ought to produce. Before it is pos-
sible to put things together in the most skilful and profitable
way, we must investigate the exact relations of these things to
each other. In a word, farm economy is at once a collection of
experimental arts and experimental sciences, which can only be
advanced by wisely conducted and truthfully reported experi-
ments.

FARM ACCOUNTS.

From an Address before the Berkshire Society.
BY JUSTUS TOWER, ESQ.

‘A very important consideration for the farmer, is, to be sys-
tematic and accurate in all his business transactions. We look
upon the merchant, manufacturer, or mechanic, with distrust,
who does not manage his business in a systematic manner.
One of the secrets of success may be found in the counting-
room, where the ledger reveals all the facts. Every article

59*

466 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

that has been received into the mill is entered; the raw mate-
rial, the labor, and every contingency, also every yard of cloth
made and sent away; bills of sale entered. Within the leaves
of that ledger are the facts which show whether prosperity or
adversity are the fruits of their toil.

It is just as important for the farmer, although he may
operate upon a smaller scale, yet this is no apology. Suppose
the young farmer, (for our hopes are in him,) should enter upon.
a thorough system of keeping an exact account of every trans-
action upon the farm. First, the appraisal of all his stock and
implements of husbandry, grain and vegetables on hand, every
expense of every crop, the time of ploughing, and how deep,
time of sowing, how much manure used on each piece, its value
and how applied, when each piece was planted and the manner,
when hoed, what fertilizer used, when cut up, when harvested,
and the amount of products. Now the first good result will be
in the commencement, from the fact that a correct record is to
be made of all the transactions on the farm, and all that per-
tains to it. There will be more care; ground for ploughing
will be assigned with more caution, manure used with better
judgment, better ploughing and better tilling. There will be a
sort of pride springing up which is a good stimulant for doing
things well.

Now the result: the harvest is closed, the winter comes on,
the threshing is done, the grain, the butter and cheese, the pork,
beef, turkeys and chickens, and all the little departments are
closed up, and the books are posted, the items all added
together, of the expenses and the income, the appraisal of
property on hand, and the result is shown. Besides all this,
he has a record of every field of grain, the expense of every
crop and what it has produced, per acre, and its value, and the
income of his stock. The manner his compost has been made,
and expense, the amount of repairs made, how much wall built,
his experience in raising vegetables, and remarks about the
fruit trees and fruit, and general remarks about the business of
his profession. The sequel is, the young man is better pre-
pared for the operations of the farm another year, than he has
ever been. He has minute experience, he knows the most
profitable crops to raise, he will fill up the omission, and avoid

AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION. 467

the errors of the past, and there will will be improvement upon
improvement, and the greatest improvement will be upon the
man himself. Man is so constituted, that if he works with his
mind, as well as with his hands, he will advance in knowledge.

AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION.

From an Address before the Housatonic Society, Septem-
ber 29, 1853.

BY HON. H. L. DAWES.

The Commonwealth encourages the multiplication of societies
kindred to the one here assembled, and they are an essential
element in the system of agricultural improvement. They per-
form an indispensable part in awakening an interest, kindling
a love of emulation, a zeal in competition for prizes, which, in
their reaction upon the farmer at home and in his fields, are
sure incentives to improvement. But I think I may be pardon-
ed by you for speaking out here my own conviction, that alone
they never will accomplish the work so important, so indispen-
sable—the one great duty of the day and the hour—the regene-
ration of the soil of Massachusetts. They may be powerful
coadjutors, but they do not strike at the root. Their mission
is to awaken, to arouse, to stimulate, but not to reveal princi-
ple, to unveil the hidden, to enlighten, to educate, or to
strengthen. You may, and no doubt have awakened in all the
farmers who yearly come up to this fair, a desire to enter into
a generous competition in the improvement of their farms.
But you have not taught one of them what ails the worn out,
barren fields, whose weather-beaten surface mocks his zeal.
You have not told him why the same acre will not bear corn
through all the years of his life, nor why his manure seems
thrown away on one part of his farm, and is comparatively
worthless on another. In short, you have not told him what
his farm is made of, nor of what are composed the crops he
yearly reaps from it. Nor can he learn from you the chemical
relation existing between the soil and the manure which he

468 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

applies to it. These he must learn elsewhere, for you cannot
teach them to him. Now, unless he stumbles upon them by
accident, of what practical avail is it to him that you awaken
in him a desire ever so strong to excel his neighbor in the rich-
ness, the variety, or the quantity of the products of the soil?
He must know what to do, or it matters little whether he care
to do or not. ‘True, it is better to care to do and not to know,
than to know and not to care, for the solicitude may aid in the
discovery. But otherwise man is only rendered dissatisfied
with his condition without the means of making it better.
These are some of the obstacles to be encountered by the
farmer in the discharge of the grand, crowning duty of this
day—the regeneration of the soil of Massachusetts. And the
means, not now within his reach, that shall enable him to
triumph over them in this great attainment, are the necessities
of the farmers of this Commonwealth, of which I am to speak.

These means lie in an agricultural education. And for their
accomplishment let Massachusetts establish an agricultural
school where will be taught the principles of the science, and
their application to the art of agriculture, and let the doors of
knowledge be opened wide to all the sons of her soil—not for
the study of the speculative and mysterious, but the practical
and useful. It may not be for us as yet, to know the process
by which the fruits of the earth attain their growth. We be-
hold the spire of grass putting forth beneath the genial influ-
ences of the sun and rain, but the mysterious agencies which
lift it from the seed to the full grown blade are, as yet, too
subtle and profound for finite ken. The trees in spring time
put on their foliage like a garment, but the tiny shuttle that
weaves the texture of the leaf plies its thread unseen. The
lilies of the field are arrayed in a glory surpassing that of Sol-
omon, but the pencil which traces their gorgeous hues moves
without hands, and is seen only by the great Artist above,
whose thoughts are not as our thoughts, and whose ways are
past finding out.

But though it;}may not be permitted us to comprehend the
process by which the elementary substances of the earth are
transformed into the fruits we reap and garner up in barns, yet
we may know what those substances are, and where they exist.

/

AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION. 469

It is one of the primary objects of an agricultural education, to
reveal these truths to the tiller of the soil. Without that
knowledge he cannot successfully prosecute his calling. That
knowledge he can attain. The principles of agricultural science
are the combined result of all experience in husbandry, and all
deductions from all other sciences upon this subject. Many of
those principles are not yet fully developed. Where but in the
school, with competent instruction, can the tiller of the soil be-
come master of those principles which are known, or be led
successfully to explore the arcana of nature in search of the
unknown.

The farmers of Massachusetts have not always shown an
alacrity in embracing all professed improvements in the culture
of their farms. Many of them, as in every thing else, are but
professions, while some are of real intrinsic worth. But the
farmer hears of them by accident, or through the questionable
source of some interested patentee. He has seen the failure of
so many experiments. He knows nothing of the principles of
their application, whether they should succeed or fail, he would
be alike ignorant of the cause of success or failure, and he,
therefore, either foregoes their application altogether, or
blindly tries, and as blindly fails, and then turns away in dis-
gust from all new notions to the old track his fathers trod
before him.

If, on the other hand, all these professed improvements could
be submitted to the test of scientific experiment, upon a farm
owned by the State, and connected with an institution for the
education of farmers; if their principles could there be devel-
oped and taught by practical demonstration to the sons of the
owners of the soil, then what proved worthless would be thrown
aside without a useless expenditure of time and money by the
practical farmer, and without engendering that disgust of all
innovations which is so prone to follow a failure to realize
promised results. And whatever time and trial have tested
and shown valuable, would be brought home to immediate prac-
tical application under the auspices of enlightened, educated
mind. The result of experiments thus conducted cannot be
doubtful. Theory is thereby reduced to practice, and the rules
which abstract science teaches are thus demonstrated and illus-

470 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

~

trated. No fanciful projects of farmers in buckram, no imprac-
ticable plans of kid-gloved gentlemen would then ever vex and
disgust farmers in frocks.

It is in the light of such an institution, erected and liberally
endowed by the State, with the aid of private benefactions, for
they should go hand in hand, that the farmer, awakened from
the pacified sleep, in which he and his neighbors and their
fathers before them have rested, would walk and store his mind
with the rich fruits of the experience of all times and ages,
and with the lessons which all science would teach. It is here
he would trace effect back to cause, sift out error, detect the
false from the true, and arm himself in full panoply of experi-
ence and skill against the most inveterate prejudice and unyield-
ing obstacles that ever beset the path of the farmer.

At such an institution, if properly endowed, there would be
found specimens of all the different kinds of soil which prevail
in Massachusetts. And the student of agriculture could there
submit his own farm to the crucible of science, and study its
qualities in the laboratory or the lecture-room, analyzing it by
the help of chemical agents and experimenting on it by the
application of those properties found deficient, or neutralizing
those which exist to excess. In fine, spreading out his own
acres like a book before him, and studying them as a difficult
problem, of which experimental knowledge and scientific deduc-
tion furnish the solution. Let the young man destined to the
hitherto neglected, but honorable calling, of the tiller of the
soil, be educated for his, as men are educated for the other
professions; his mind schooled and disciplined, let him start
in the world with the help of other men’s experience and study,
just as a man would commence the practice of law, or of the
medical profession, and success surely awaits industry and
enterprise.

It is to this end that I urge here the importance of the
establishment of a State institution for instruction in agricul-
ture. It should be the property of the State, for the fruits of
its success would be the enhancement of the wealth, the eleva-
tion and independence of the yeomanry, the improvement of
the social and moral condition: of the whole people of the
Commonwealth. No private liberality could open such an

AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION. 471

institution to all the tillers of the soil, yet to it should be
drawn those of all classes and conditions. And they should
there find all the allurements and attractions with which science
can invest this, the noblest of all arts. Let the young man be
here imbued with the wisdom of all experience in agriculture,
with all that science has as yet revealed of the constitution and
capacities of the earth he is to till; let him be quickened
to push still further his researches and experiments into un-
explored regions, and bring back some new fruits for practical
application, and he will come back to the every day realities
of practical life a new man, equal to every emergency, and com-
petent for any undertaking.

For one moment picture to yourselves that entire generation
of young men in this Commonwealth, who are just now entering
upon the active duties and responsibilities of life, coming forth
from such an institution, educated as I have described, cultivat-
ed in mind and in all habits of industry and frugality, quicken-
ed with a love of knowledge, and pervaded with a zeal that
shall beget improvement—and what, let me ask, may we not
hope at their hands? How, under such a generation of farmers,
would the surface of the earth clothe itself anew as with a gar-
ment! How would the waste places bud and blossom, and
bear fruit! The barren fields-would wake into newness of life.
The flocks would, in very truth, be led into green pastures, and
the herds by the still waters. Fruit and ornamental trees
would cover the nakedness of our hill-sides, and comfort and
competence would bask in the sunshine of a goldenage. Here-'
in is our hope. On such a day does expectation wait. No
man can draw a fancy picture of the result. I believe I shall
have your assent, that could one whole generation be thus
educated, no sketch of mine could portray in too high a color-
ing the result of their labors. The imagination would fall
limping behind the reality in such a march of improvement.

I cannot presume upon your time or patience long enough to
enter at all into the details of such an undertaking. I can only
attempt to gather the thoughts, the aspirations, and hopes of
the farmers who may hear me, upon some object kindred to
this. When that is done throughout the State, then will be
overcome the greatest obstacle now in our path—the reluctance

472 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

of the Commonwealth to embark in such an enterprise, and ex-
pend her capital and devote her energies to such a purpose.
No one doubts the ability of Massachusetts, if she choose to
endow an institution for the education of her sons in agricul-
ture, that shall as far exceed, in all that gives life and efficacy
and practical value, theprincely institution of Cirencester, in
England, or the more renowned and more useful Hofwyl
School of Fellenburg, in Switzerland, as English enterprise is
wont to exceed ours in the magnificent scale on which it is
always projected, and in the sluggish pace at which it usually
moves; or as that of Switzerland may surpass ours in the high
toned and transcendental schemes which pervade her every
undertaking. To all this Massachusetts is abundantly able.
But she will not enter into it readily. She will consider,
contemplate, and more than that, like her Yankee children
she will calculate and reckon some time, before she will em-
bark in this undertaking with a soul that shall make suce-
cess certain. All this is well. No more important under-
taking can enlist the energies of this Commonwealth, and
she will do well to count all the cost. She has done much,
it is true—no State has done more—to add Iustre and real
glory to the American name. Her public works, her public
charities, her seminaries of learning, her institutions for the
reform of the erring, and the punishment of the incorrigible
—all bear testimony at once to her noble heart and liberal
hand. Eyes has she been to the blind, ears to the deaf, and
the dumb have learned to lisp her name and her charities in the
same breath. Her munificence has lifted to the light of reason
the veil that darkens the desolate mind of the lost and wander-
ing lunatic; and at her table have fed, till they no longer hun-
gered, the beggared outcasts of the old world. But there is
still other great and noble work for her to perform. There is
yet another high duty to her own sons, she must sooner or
later discharge. Home and household are not to be forgotten
in yielding to the behests of an universal charity. When she
not only sees, but feels, that amidst all her munificence lavished
upon the objects of desert or of favor around her, that her own
soil is growing poorer and poorer every year—while those who
consume her products are daily multiplying on her hands, she

AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION 473

will then turn herself to the consideration of this subject with
an intensity commensurate with its importance. She will be-
hold with pain the best blood of her sons turning their backs
upon the homes of their youth and the good old Commonwealth
of their love and their pride, and their faces to the rich prairies
and abundant harvest of the teeming West. And though, like a
fond mother, she may boast that itis the enterprise and indom-
itable will of her sons that have written themselves far above
competition in every distant field, yet this exultant pride can-
not but be saddened by the consciousness that all these achieve-
ments of her sons abroad must be at the expense of her own
household at home; that the old patrimonial estate of Massa-
chusetts Bay and Plymouth Colony is in danger of losing its
attractions for the sons of the Pilgrims, and that the youthful
energies and expanding resources of other States are drawing
away to their full bosoms that strong, that irrepressible, irre-
sistible Yankee character to which

«None but itself can be its parallel !’”’—

and which if it could find room at home for its expansion, and
material on which to expend its superabundant life, would make
its mother State the rival of the world.

When, I say, Massachusetts not only sees but feels all this,
then will she, in self-defence, turn her thoughts to the remedy.
And then will you behold the walls of such an institution as I
have delineated, beginning to rise—not rapidly like a gourd in
the night—but slowly, and from deep and permanent founda-
tions. It is but a question of time. Sooner or later that day
will come, to gladden the hearts and gild the dawning hopes of
the farmers of this Commonwealth. The spirit which is being
awakened throughout the State, of which such societies as this,
with their annual exhibitions, are at once the evidence and the
origin, is hastening on that day.

My only apprehension is that the languishing powers,—the
recuperative energies of our soil and our enterprise,—may be
suffered to sink below revival, and that the spirits of the sons
of these hills may be condemned to the pressure of such bur-
dens so long that they may lose that elasticity which, with free
scope and room, ever bound into the full proportions and per-

60*

474. MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

fect statue of manhood. “But fears of this kind fade away in
the light of the manifestations around me, of that restless spirit
of inquiry, dissatisfied with the present, apprehensive for the
future,—seeking to avoid the declivity, and reaching up the
ascent, for the attainment of what there is an inward conscious-
ness of capacity to achieve, kindled in the breasts of the steady
yeomanry all over the Commonwealth, bringing them up from
their harvest fields brown with the summer’s sun, and making
profert of the stalwart arm and iron muscle which no toil can
tire; coming up with the emblems and fruits of the sweat of
their brow, to these festivals, here to rejoice in “ the victories
of peace more renowned than those of war.” These omens are
unmistakable. They augur a public sentiment which, ere long,
will be resistless, and out of which will spring that action of
the Commonwealth, which, sooner or later, self-respect and
self-defence will compel her to take.

Fellow-citizeus, I have attempted to picture to you but one
view of that future which all the signs of the times unite in pro-
nouncing so near at hand. I have but reminded you of the gain
to your granaries and your treasures, which would flow in from
every hill-side, and spring up in every vale under the benign
influence of an enlightened and liberal education bestowed on
every farmer. There are other views of this subject not less
important, and which ought never to be omitted or made sub-
ordinate in the consideration of the measureless good with
which it is fraught—views which, were not both my time and
your patience exhausted, I should delight to present. Never-
theless, do not forget the moral and religious influences which
would be shed over the land, by such a system of education.
Ignorance and vice are hand-maids, but an enlightened educa-
tion clothes a man or a body of men in a coat of mail, and
becomes a shield and a rampart against the insidious approach
of the tempter. Nor is this all. Such an education will open
to the farmer the beauties, the mysteries and the sublimities of
nature. He will not then go forth to his daily toil like a de-
mented slave, or a senseless automaton, but his eyes by this
anointing will be opened to the beauty of God’s works spread
out before him. The landscape, the velvet lawn, the golden
sunset, the gushing fountain, and the little rivulet handing itself

AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION. 475

down from crag to crag, gamboling along the hill-sides, and
“singing down the narrow glen,”—the hoar frost that puts in
bonds the earth, and the snow which covers it like wool,—all
are eloquent to the enlightened, but dumb to the stupid. Earth
opens her secrets to the inquiring mind,—and the studious
farmer, as he bends over his daily labor, reads the deep and
hidden mysteries of creation. The winds, the rain, the storms,
the tempests, all are to him so many preachers, lifting his rev-
erent mind from the contemplation of nature, up to nature’s
God.

Gentlemen, I have detained you too long, and, I fear, with
too little profit. I have not attempted, for I have not felt
competent, to instruct any one of you in the practical details
of farming. I have not discoursed of the qualities of ma-
nures, of the improvement of your stock, or of the culture of
your fruit. These are topics which belong to the practical
farmer, and although fully impressed with the importance of all
these, and the value of all information respecting them, I am
also conscious of my own infirmity. I have sought the rather,
on this occasion, to draw your attention to your position and
duties, and to the radical defects and short-comings in all our
struggles to elevate the standard of agriculture in this Com-
monwealth. I have also attempted to point out the remedy to
be a systematic, a thorough, and a liberal professional educa-
tion for the farmer, furnished by the State, coéperating with
private munificence. And on an institution thus founded and
endowed, I have endeavored to ground your hopes for the re-
generation of the soil of the Commonwealth, and for the proper
elevation and true dignity of her sons.

And permit me, in conclusion, to add, that it lies with your-
selves, under a gracious Providence, to say when this golden
age shall be ushered in. For though you cannot build this
great temple with your own hands, yet you may give tone to
the policy of our common government, which can lay its founda-
tions deep as perpetuity, and spread its ample arches broad as
the land. You are, in the multitude, as well as in the individ-
ual, the architects of your own fortune.

You may, by indifference, suffer the half-finished walls of this
temple to tumble down in neglect, or rise, if at all, dispropor-

476 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

tioned and incongruous, repulsive to the votaries at its shrine,
inefficient in its influence and abortive in its mission—or you
can, if you will, adorn and beautify its rising columns, crowd
its broad and lofty portals with devotees bringing their sheaves
with them and fixing their trophies in its very dome, till it shall
become the just pride, and, under God, the ultimate preserver
of the Commonwealth. Build ye, for yourselves and for pos-
terity.

THE PROGRESS OF AGRICULTURE.
From an Address before the Norfolk Society.

BY REY. F. D. HUNTINGTON.

There is a rather irregular and unorganized, but on the whole
progressive, body of information, which is called, by courtesy,
the Science of Agriculture. It is gradually taking the shape
and proportions, under your intelligent authors and periodicals,
of other and exacter sciences. If we seize this body of knowl-
edge precisely in its present position, and speak to its present
exigency, we shall find, I suspect, that it has passed through its
first stage, viz.: its era of general discovery, and is now wait-
ing for the patient hand of detailed experiment, and the organ-
izing effects of a comprehensive induction.

I said it has passed through its first stage, or era of general
discovery. The fact is, it passed through that stage so long ago,
and stood still so long after, that it might reasonably have been
doubted whether it ever meant to go on. If there is any thing
amazing in human history, I suppose it is the stationary atti-
tude assumed by this radical employment of man, from the
period of its origin in Syria, which must have been somewhere
near Adam’s time, down to about the present century. Con-
sider that the race of proper ploughs—the only ploughs we
should recognize as worthy the name—the basis implement of
the whole business—is only about eighty years old. One apol-
ogy offered for this protracted state of catalepsy is an alleged

THE PROGRESS OF AGRICULTURE. ATT

double misfortune agriculture has had to suffer from climate—
both extremes entering into a conspiracy to put it back; since
the tropics ripened every thing for it without the trouble of cul-
tivation, while the frozen regions made it so much trouble to
cultivate that it would not try. This explanation would answer
pretty well, if nature had not happened to spread out a belt of
territory round the globe, which is neither arctic nor torrid,
but temperate, of very respectable dimensions,'and admirably
fitted for any progressive demonstrations, had our enterprising
forefathers been so inclined. The simple truth may as well be
confessed at once: Our progenitors liked fighting one another
better than fighting stumps and swamps. That was the world’s
boyhood, and, like the few boys left in our day, who are not
oldish little men in short clothes, those swift and supple sinews
chose the bow and spear, with the big wrestling ground of bar-
barian tribes, before the civilizing, but rather fatiguing, pickaxe
and shovel. <A better excuse, I am inclined to think, though
far from a sufficient one, will be found in the paradoxical cir-
cumstance, that the great advantage of agricultural pursuits
has been their great hindrance. I mean the general indepen-
dence they allow, as providing, in themselves, the necessities of
living. This supersedes commerce, removes competition, and
so tends to quench enterprise.

In affirming agricultural science to have passed through its
epoch of general discovery, however, I referred not so much to
the rude and slow advances it made for thousands of years
earlier, as to the more recent period when it took a sudden
start forward, and may be said to have first risen into the dig-
nity of an intellectual concern. These discoveries moved in
two directions, chemical and mechanical. Chemistry applied
analysis to the whole material of agriculture, plants and ani-
mals and all products, as well as soils; whereas the stupidity
of ages had been taking it for granted that, since all earth is
earth, it matters nothing what its elements are, so the seed be
under ground. Mechanism stretched out its hand, and gave the
husbandman a new set of tools—a branch of the general turn
for mechanical invention and elaboration that has marked the
mental movement of the last hundred years. By both these
agencies, not only was a new principle introduced into the action

478 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

of agriculture, but at the same time accrued an enlargement of
its spirit and motive.

Of course, at the first, chemistry did very little with her
crucible, and mechanism comparatively little with its smitheries
and factories. Both have, probably, only begun their magical
economics yet. But it is none the less true, that in the simple
discovery of the fact, chemistry, along with geology and physi-
ology, has relations to farming, and could be made to help it,
in the bare establishing of that fact, was a grander crisis in
the history of this business than is likely ever to come again.
So in the demonstrated feasibility of labor-saving machinery,
after the wooden ploughshare and the live-stock threshing
apparatus of centuries, there was the turning of a corner, the
opening of a new page, the sudden light that always breaks in
with the sunrise of a fresh principle, which did more for you
than perhaps can be done again. So that if it is modest ever
to predicate such a thing of any interest, in a day so preg-
nant with wonders as ours, we might venture to declare, that
the grandeurs of reformation, the cardinal revolutions, and
the Lutheran age, in agriculture, are passed.

What, at any rate, is the precise direction of the efforts
wanted now, and demanded of you, as farmers, who, in culti-
vating the earth, mean to cultivate yourselves? It will be
found, I suspect, that the answer to this question is as practi-
cal a theme, and as well worth your study, as any that the
propricties of to-day could possibly suggest. We hear much
vaguely said of the need of enlightened farming—it has been
the topic of repeated occasions like this: it is worth in-
quiring, where, precisely, just at this time, that light should be
made to fall in.

' In the first place, the posture of New England farmers as
they are, exposes the need of rousing still further what may be
called the spirit of the profession. It has its own rights,
privileges, duties, and titles to homage. I remember, of course,
how the very festival that calls us together, the wide depart-
ments of your annual display, and especially the spacious and
convenient edifice now given up to the uses of your enterprise,
with similar gatherings enlivening other counties and States in
this part of the year, are proofs that this process of quicken-

THE PROGRESS OF AGRICULTURE. 479

ing has already begun, and goes on. But then I remember, as
well, how large a numerical majority of those who are called
farmers of Norfolk, fail altogether to represent themselves at
the fair; how many others are present, not as competitors, in
the arena, but only as gazers at a brilliant but distant and
uninstructive pageant; and how inconsiderable, if I may say
so, is the number that carry away such vital impulses, or such
solid ideas, as will tell on the direct management of their own
acres, and their next year’s seed, and crops, and stock. This
living and ardent interest which turns every item in the spec-
tacle, every colt and cow, pig and parsnip, heifer and hen, rug
and rareripe, to a stimulating value, and nerves a more reso-
lute purpose to make the most of each man’s or woman’s per-
sonal chance,—this is the sort of ambition that pushes your
pursuit forward, converting it from a servile drudgery to one
of the elegant arts, and winning for it heights of excellence
and honor. I am afraid it must be acknowledged that intel-
lectual apathy has been the drowsy curse that has so long
somnambulized agriculture; and if it will serve to soften the
accusation from an outside party, I will put the pulpit in with
the plough; though who knows but if there were less dull
planting, the wholesome contagion would run up the pulpit
stairs, and there would be less dull preaching? Or,if it seems
uneracious to press this charge just when the sleepers are
waking up, I remind you, on the other hand, that these occa-
sional signs of animation only cast the adjacent obstinacy into
amore palpable disgrace. It is not that cheering signals of
of invigorated intelligence are not stirring the air; but that
these better notions are not made to work their way out, and
settle down on the actual fields, and regenerate your daily
operations. Hence, I say, what you want, is, by the help of
the school, some systematic means of pushing every improve-
ment out into the mass that have not yet arisen to come in
search of it.

If you will allow me to ask questions, Are there no tokens to
be found among you, that some of the primary maxims of the
improved husbandry are as completely disregarded as the bulle-
tins of the Chinese rebellion? Are there no fields lying in
Norfolk, this fall, whose dwarfish crops proclaim as dismally

480 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

as language could, that it has not yet been found out by their
owners that potatoes and turnips crave potash, that clover and
peas want lime, that wheat and oats hunger for silex and phos-
phoric acid, just as voraciously as the Irishman in the kitchen
wants the potatoes, horses the clover, or children late home
from school the wheat ?

Are there not certain triangular stains smirching the sides
of barns under the stable-windows, left there by manure-heaps
that took all weathers with no roof, which tell every passer-by
that these prodigal feeders, though they locked the barn doors
every night, and set traps for foxes, and sent constables after
the thief that stole their apples, forgot that the atmosphere has
a sly way of turning robber, as well as giver,—that the sun
and rain filch as well as fertilize,—and so did not shelter nor
fasten down, by boards and muck and forest leaves and plaster,
those volatile salts and gases which these noiseless marauders
were snatching up into the sky,—so much gold out of their
pockets? You would hardly applaud the thrift of a manufac-
turer that throws away a quarter of his raw material.

Are there no specimens of stock, in the yards and pastures
of these towns, rawboned and diseased, and lean as the leanest
kine of Pharaoh,—walking illustrations of the “anatomy of
melancholy,”—which seem to show that the problem in their
keeping has been reduction to the lowest terms, and the mul-
tiplying of exceedingly vulgar fractions of beasts, or finding
the equation between the minimum of attention and the maxi-
mum of emaciation? Is there none of this stock usurping the
place, and consuming the fodder, which of right belong to cat-
tle, that should be here in Dedham taking premiums,—stock
that has been badly selected, badly crossed, badly reared,—
incarnated, or rather inskeletoned libels on the whole law of
reproduction ?

On the other hand, have you all discovered the real philoso-
phy and economy there is in feeding your cattle on pine boards ?
in other words, discovered that if you put them w/o a warm
stable, instead of letting them shiver on the north side of it,
all the drizzly and frosty weather of winter, you thereby pro-
vide fuel for their vital sustenance which the furnace in their
lungs would otherwise have to borrow from their stomachs, to

ADAPTATION OF SOILS. 481

keep up the temperature, at the cost of a fifth more in quantity
of meal or hay? Have you acted on the false presumption
that young cattle will eat up the third-rate stuff, like stalks and
straw, with a better appetite if they are not allowed any thing
else-—whereas the truth of their dietetics is, that they will
swallow this inferior food far more easily at noon, if you lubri-
cate their throats with a little more epicurean catering for
breakfast ?

Are there no dilapidated buildings, filthy front yards, stag-
gering fences, broken tools scattered over haymows and corn-
bins and woodpiles, instead of hanging cleansed and polished
in a tool-room,—all vile witnesses how it is forgotten that pros-
perity never takes the arm of a sloven?

Now these neglects seem to show that, over and above the
attainments of a few scholarly persons, or rather between their
science and the practical work of the multitude, there is needed
a connecting link,—something to kindle in Messrs. Smith, Jones
and Brown, out on the lots, an appreciative concern for the
writings and deductions of Messrs. Liebig and Norton, Hitch-
cock, Jackson and Harris, in their studies and laboratories.
An exhibition is opened to some purpose, if an emulation is
provoked by it that sends every man home from cattle-show,
determined that he will be a master on his acres, and not a
plantation slave, driven by the whip and thong of those two
tyrannical overseers, necessity and routine,—an original creator
by his mind, and not the mere manual drudge of habit.

ADAPTATION OF SOILS.

From an Address before the Plymouth Society, October %,
1853.

BY SANFORD HOWARD.

Can the soil of this section be made to aid, advantageously,

in the support of your population, and if so, in what manner?

This question leads us to inquire what are the inducements
G1?

482 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

and facilities for agricultural production here, as compared
with other sections? We see, in the first place, that a large
proportion of your population is not directly engaged in agri-
culture. They are consumers of the products raised by others.
This not only causes an immediate home market for agricultural
products, but creates a demand which cannot be supplied from
your own territory, and to meet which, articles are transported
great distances. It is obvious, then, that in reference to loca-
tion, you possess the important advantage of nearness to market
—it being even at your doors.

The first view from these circumstances, might lead to the
inference that your agricultural advantages were of the highest
order. Labor is not more scarce or dear here, compared with
other commodities, than in other sections of this country.
Why, then, do not the inducements for the pursuit of agricul-
ture preponderate in favor of this section? If there were not
other important points affecting the question, it might be
answered in the affirmative. Ina word, if the natural capacities
of your soil were equal to those of some other districts, the
superiority of your advantages could not be denied. This is
the point in which the comparison is least favorable to you.
Some may be disposed to consider your climate as alike un-
favorable; a glance, however, will convince one that a large
part of the most productive farming land in the country is not
more favorably situated in this respect than your section. But
in respect to natural fertility of soil, there are large tracts in
the interior which are superior to this region. This, then, is
the source of a competition in your markets, with which you
have to contend unequally. How shall it be avoided? what
course can you adopt by which you may place yourselves on an
equal footing with those who cultivate a more productive soil?

The first attempt, obviously, should be to confine your opera-
tions to those portions of your soil which most nearly approx-
imate to that cultivated by your competitors. If, because they
have better land than you, they are able to incur the charges of
transportation and oppose you in your own markets, you must
meet them with weapons as nearly similar as you can obtain—
choose the best land you have, and devote it to those crops
which will best reward your labor.

ADAPTATION OF SOILS. 483

This proposition of course involves a very important modifi-
cation of the management of land in this section. You have
comparatively but a small proportion of that which is naturally
fertile, or of that which can easily be kept in a highly produc-
tive state. What shall be done with the poorer and greater
portion? Devote it to wood. Fuel for your dwellings, as
well as for carrying on various manufactures, and timber for
many purposes, will always be wanted.

Much of your land which is valueless for cultivation, will pro-
duce trees without any labor but that of planting, and in some
instances merely by a spontaneous growth. The subject of
planting forest trees is one of great moment to many parts of
this country, and especially to those sections which have much
poor soil. Within a few years it has attracted considerable
attention, and encouraging results have been obtained. This
is not the proper occasion to go into details on this subject,
and there is the less need of doing so from the fact that it has
already received your attention. A word as to the kinds of
trees best adapted to different situations may not be out of
place here.

The white birch will flourish on the poorest soil. Even the
most sterile gravel affords it a home in which it grows rapidly.
I believe it is the opinion of a distinguished and venerable
father of-your society, that the poorest land in your section is
worth ten or twelve dollars an acre for the growth of this
species of tree. In other situations, as the common plain land,
the pitch and white pine might be more suitable. The Scotch
larch has been found to grow admirably in various parts of this
State. Itis a tree of great value. It will grow rapidly either
on gravelly knolls and plains, or rocky, bleak hills, and makes
timber only second in value to oak, and for a variety of uses is
even superior. In forty years’ growth, in Europe, it answers
many purposes in ship-building. On the farm formerly occupied
by Col. Timothy Pickering, in Wenham, in this State, is a plan-
tation of Scotch firs, set out by Col. P. about fifty years ago.
They are now beautiful trees, and are very valuable for timber.

The young trees may be had at most nurseries, or may be
imported, when small, at about two dollars a hundred. The
chestnut is easily produced from seed, and in moist, strong soils

484 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

crows rapidly, and affords timber of much value. From the
habit of sprouting from the stump, and its great tenacity of life,
it needs no renewal by planting, after it is once established.
The yellow locust, where exempt from the attack of the borer,
is highly valuable, and particularly so from its thriftiness on
sandy land, and the fertilizing effect it produces on the soil.
On this account it has been made very useful in open planta-
tions in increasing the growth of grass.

On blowing sands, and the most bleak and exposed situa-
tions, as sea-beaches, &c., the silver poplar will flourish. It
erows with more rapidity than almost any other tree, and from
its habit of sending up shoots from its roots, which in their
turn become trees, it is admirably suited to the locations
alluded to.

The proper planting of trees would redeem from unsightly
and desolate barrenness thousands of acres, would add greatly
to the beauty of the country, and render the land devoted to
cultivation more valuable from the protection afforded against
winds. In fact, as a means of enhancing the value of landed
property by utility and ornament, it is a measure of the Rie
est consequence.

Having appropriated to trees the land which cannot be prof-
itably cultivated, the next point will be to devote the remainder
to those crops which will give the best return. And here it
should be borne in mind that we have not only to regard the
competition of other sections in the selection of the land, but
that point should be kept equally in view in the choice of crops.
We must consider what is most needed here, what can be most
readily produced, and what is obtained with most difficulty from
abroad.

Bulk and weight, rather than the pecuniary value of articles,
regulate the cost of transportation. The actual cost of trans-
porting a ton of hay a thousand miles, is as great as that of
transporting a ton of wool the same distance, while their actual
value bears no proportion.

With you, hay and grass are, and probably will continue to
be, the most important articles of farm produce. Domestic an-
imals are essential to supply the wants of a community. Here
the horse and the ox are required for labor, and the cow is

ADAPTATION OF SOILS. 485

required for milk. We see that a large number of these are
kept, and hay and grass must be their chief support. The de-
mand for these articles, from causes which have already been
mentioned, can be most readily supplied from your own soil.
To meet the demand, attention should be directed to the im-
provement of all grounds calculated to produce good grass in
abundance—particularly those which from the presence of
water are at present unproductive, but are susceptible of
drainage.

Perhaps the next most important article which can be culti-
vated here, is Indian corn. This strictly American grain is of
inestimable value. No other is capable of producing, for the
ground it occupies, so large an amount of sustenance for man
and beast. It is adapted to a great range of climate—growing
from Mexico to Canada. It is not extravagant to say that it
has been an important means in the civilization of this country.
To our Pilgrim fathers it was indispensable, and i in reference
to their children, the expression that

‘¢ All their bones were made of Indian corn,” *

may be said to contain as much truth as poetry. Without it
the early settlers could hardly have subsisted. With the grain
they fed themselves, and with the stalks they fed their animals.
The labors which they accomplished in subduing the forest and
their savage foes, furnish proof of its strength-giving properties.

The transportation of Indian corn a great distance, is at-
tended with objections. The cost of freight is as great, per
bushel, as that of wheat, and when it reaches the Atlantic cities,
its value is only about half as much. This is a sufficient obsta-
cle to railroad transportation. It cannot be brought from the
West by any other means, except during the period of lake
and canal navigation; and if brought in bulk, (as is done to
lessen the expense,) it is, at that time of the year, very liable
to injury by heating. It can be brought from the South in ves-
sels, in cool weather. But the comparatively uniform price
which the home-grown article has sustained for several years
past, is proof that it is not very injuriously affected by foreign

supply.

* Barlow.

486 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

Proof has been repeatedly given that the light soils of the
Old Colony are capable of producing large crops of Indian
corn—such as are seldom equalled in other sections; and
although the nature of your soil in general will not admit of its
cultivation to so great an extent, it is probable that your best
crops pay as large a profit by the acre, as any that are produced
in the country.

Vegetables and fruits will generally afford you a remunerative
profit. They are perishable articles, rather bulky and weighty,
and with the exception of such as possess the property of keep-
ing a considerable time, will not bear lengthened transporta-
tion; and even in these, there is not yet so large an amount
produced in the interior as to seriously affect the market. The
apple is used in immense quantities, and may be considered an
essential article of food. The pear, though regarded as a lux-
ury, is easily produced, and is readly sold in our markets at
high prices. By the modern modes of culture, the tree can be
made to bear in a short time from planting, and every person
who has a few rods of ground, may enjoy the gratification of
eating the choicest kinds.

You have an indigenous fruit which deserves attention. I
mean the cranberry. It has latterly been sought after to con-
siderable extent, and actually forms quite an export trade,
which will probably increase. In this article you need not
fear competition—it cannot be produced elsewhere cheaper
than here. There is not a great extent of territory adapted
to it. Various experiments have been made to cultivate it on
upland, but it seems pretty well proved that it must have an
abundant supply of moisture, and that it is not adapted to dry
soils. It has succeeded on moist, sandy soils, manured with
muck.

Great quantities of vegetables are consumed in an immature
state, or are wanted at that time of the year when they cannot
be carried far, or kept long on hand. The supply of these is
of course within your control.

We have heretofore spoken of the keeping of domestic ani-
mals as a matter of necessity; the horse, the ox, and the cow,
are to you, incidental requisites. It is worthy of consideration
whether the keeping of live stock may not be advantageously

ADAPTATION OF SOILS. 487

engaged in to a further extent; whether, under the high prices
of meat, the production of beef, pork, and mutton, may not be
made to pay youa profit. In regard to swine, they are kept
to a certain extent, as consumers of articles which would other-
wise be wasted. They are also regarded as useful in increas-
ing fertilizing material for the land. But according to some
trials which have the appearance of accuracy, a bushel of corn,
ground and cooked, or slightly fermented, will make twelve
pounds of pork. Something, doubtless, depends on the consti-
tutional propensity of the animals—some being able to assimi-
late a greater proportion of their food than others. But at
the rate mentioned, the pork would pay fairly, at seven cents a
pound, for the corn and attendance, and in connection with
the advantages before mentioned, might make the business
profitable.

The suggestion has been made by an officer of your associa-
tion, that, by the aid of Indian corn im a green and dry state,
and root crops, cattle may be fattened at a profit on some farms
in your county. The object is worthy an experiment, which it
is to he hoped will be fairly made. In case a trial of this kind
should take place, it is desirable that there should be a proper
selection of the animals. There is as much difference in cattle
as respects aptitude to fatten, as in swine.

But if it should be deemed advisable to engage in grazing
here, there is reason to believe that no stock would pay so well
as sheep—not particularly for wool, but for mutton. Theyare
specially adapted to light land. They will fatten where no
other animal can,—their meat is produced with least cost, and,
when it is of proper quality, it commands the highest price.
In connection with the growth of turnips, they have been the
means of bringing thousands of acres of thin, sandy land in
England, from an unproductive state, to one in which it yields
fine crops of clover, barley, and wheat. A few trials which
have been made in this country, have resulted satisfactorily. It
is true we have not the advantage of turnip culture to the ex-
tent it is enjoyed in Britain. There the roots are consumed
to a great extent on the land where they grow—a mode which is
very beneficial. Our winters are too severe for this. Generally,
the roots must be gathered and fed under cover. ‘This greatly

488 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE.

increases the expense. Sometimes the weather is such through
November that the crop might be fed off. A farmer in Sara-
_ toga County, N. Y., has practised this with success. Turnips
are sown after a crop of rye orclover. About the middle of
October the sheep are put on, confined by hurdles to such lots
as they will eat clean, daily. They are kept in this way till
frost or snow prevents them from feeding—usually the time is
five or six weeks. The sheep, if in tolerable order at com-
mencement, get fat, and the ground gets rich. The cost of the
turnips in this case is not over four cents a bushel.

It is a question, to be decided by actual experiment, whether
turnip husbandry can be successfully introduced here. I have
been told that a late eminent statesman and farmer, whose
residence was in your county, made extensive trials with
turnips for making beef, and that he found with these roots and
salt hay, cattle could be easily and cheaply fattened. I am
also informed that an officer of your society has made similar
trials with like results.

Iam aware that an impression prevails with some persons,
that the turnip is a great exhauster of the soil. Some isolated
facts in regard to particular soils, or the effect of the turnip in
reference to certain crops which follow it, may have given rise
to this idea; but in its general application I do not regard it
as well founded. It is totally refuted by the great truth that
the turnip culture has been the means of vastly increasing the
meats and bread-stuffs of Great Britain. This culture has
indeed been well termed “the sheet-anchor of British hus-
bandry.” Take it away, and the exodus which we have wit-
nessed from Ireland would spread over the sister kingdom, and
her

‘‘Bold yeomanry, their country’s pride,”

would leave the land forever.

We have now noticed, very briefly, the subjects which bear
more directly on the question, whether your soil can be made
to aid in the support of your population.

yr oe

Adaptation of Soils, . . : :

Agriculture, Progress of, . : .
weience of, . : 5 ° °
Agricultural Implements, . . . ° .
Education, . ° “ 4 °
, Experiments, . . . °

Apples, Varieties of, . . . . ° .
Ashes, Value of for trees, . ° 3 ° °

Barley, Cost of Raising, . ° . : .

Beans, Cultivation of, : P A ° °
Beets, : 5 - A 5 - : :
Bees, Profits of, . A rs . f : °
Books and Papers, effects of, . : . :
Butter, Statements on, r c - ° ;

Best Cows for, - 4 ‘ e :

Carrots, Cost of Raising, . ‘ é ° .
Mode of Cultivation, . ¢ ° ‘

should not be thinned, . ‘ ; 5 ¢

Cattle, Value of different Food for, . ‘
System of Feeding, , ‘ . : .

Cheese, Origin of the term, F A ; e
Clubs, Farmers, , : 4 ' : e .
Corn, Indian, Manure for, . ; - ‘

Average Yield of, , A ° .
Mode of Planting, : . .

Distance apart, . . . :
Cost of, 4 e ‘ 5 :
Large Yield of, , ’ ° .
Preparation for Planting, , ’
Shrinkage of different Varieties, .
Corn Fodder, , ’ : : . . .

Cows, for Milk, . A 2 . P “ “
Alderney, “ ’ ’ . . ’
Different Breeds of, , “ A“ ° ’

. 33, 440, 450, 459

87, 89, 100, 427

Page.
481
467

o On4id
467
454

95, 111

e | 208

- 204

. 242

390, 393
43

894, 405

o SBF

os bee

232, 241

230, 233

- 3839

» 844

» 401

: 43

138, 159

“ 14

154, 184
170

178, 180

1738, 174
179
149
185

295, 320

« 3809

sale

490 INDEX.

Cows, Food for, 3 : - :
Mode of Selecting, . : 3
Manner of Milking, . .
Treatment of, . ‘ : :

Cranberries, Cultivation of, ‘ 5

Flowing of, . 5 :
Upland Culture of,
Varieties of,

Cranberry Worm, . 5

Dairy, Improvement of the, . .
Room, A 2 é 4
Descent of Land, ¢ : A
Ditching, Cost of, 6 .
Draining, Importance of, . . :
Farm Improvements, . . . .
What required in statements on,
Management,
Accounts, . C 4 C
Premiums increased, .
Requisites of good, . .
Resources of, . °
Farmers’ Clubs, . * 4
Food for Stock, comparative Hallie of,
Forest Trees, Cultivation of, . A
Fowls, Varieties of, . é ‘
Large and Small, .
Fruit Trees, Care and Value of, . :
Reasons for Raising, .
and Vegetables, rf .
Introduction of New, .

Gathering and Preservation of,

Grass Seed, Quantity Used, ‘ é

Profits of Raising, . .

Guano, Mexican and Peruvian, . J
Use. of, . : : 5 4

with Tan, z a F -
Guenon’s Theory, . “ : 3

Hog, the Suffolk, ? 2 4 Z

Chinese, ; i ‘ .
Middlesex, . 3 3 s
Neapolitan, . . : .
Improved Essex, . . :
Points of a good, . . .
Hogs and Dogs, . ‘ . .

Honey, Production of, ° : ‘

‘244, 247, 251, 254, 486

Page.
320

op fog
333
334, 339
250
252, 256
258
247, 257
306, 326
- 339
433

. 56, 72

48, 61, 64, 70, 428, 464

8, 9, 18, 27, 40

13,

33, 455
19, 22, 36, 38
465

: 2
: 1
gs
ARES
339, 341
116, 119
. 382
386, 388
93

«4 OS
ov 40%
409
A439
. 58, 64
. 206
35048
138, 143
Aetes
282, 321
366, 376
.. Bye
377

he eye
379
362, 380
362

. 390

Horse, Size and form of the, . “ =
Defects in breeding the, . : . .
Rackets, . F ¢ A - le

491

Page.
349, 353, 357
° 350, 353
° - 419

Manure, Mode of Increasing, . : 4 11, 15, 28, 88, 188, 140, 148, 367

Liquid, : . . . . .
Plaster as a, . é 5 - -
for Trees, . : 2 A
Tar as a, - ° - - 5
Leached Ashes asa, . ; - .
Ploughing in Green Cropsasa, .
Super-phosphate of Limeasa, .

Oyster-shell Lime as a, . Ses

Mexican and Peruvian Guano, . p 7 .
Meadows, Reclaiming of, . : C A :
Value of Gravelon, . . ’ ‘

Meaning of the term, . ° . .

Milch Cows and Heifers, . : ° A .
Muck, Value of, 5 A 8 5

Nursery, Care of and Soil for, . ; ; A

Oats, Yield of, . 3 4 3 5 '

Onions, Soil for, and Yield ‘of . 6 3

Orchards, Management of, . ° . .
Distance of trees in, . : 5 5

Importance of shaping and * heading in,”

Necessity of cultivating the soil of,

Manure for, 3 2 5 : :
Soulifor, 3 3 é ’ :
Improvement of old, . 3 :

Oxen for Work, : : ; z “| °
Mode of trial of, F : ‘ °

Paring and burning, . ° . . .
Pasture Lands, a 5 C . . .
Neglect of, and cause of moss,
Effect of ett : 3 .
Peaches, Varieties of, . ‘ - 0
Pear, Varieties of the, - 3 : 5
Soils adapted to the . . : .
Cultivation of, on the Quince, .
Trees, distance apart, . 3 a
Mode of planting, . . .
Pickering, Hon. T., Letter of, . 3 ‘
Pine, Soils adapted to, J
Seeds, and mode of beth exited
Plaster, use of, . 5 5

46
re ck
80, 81, 86
135

. 13, 139, 141, 145

44, 47, 49, 67, 70

- 142
143

. - 50, 54
. ° 62
. - 296
39, 77, 80, 142

91, 103

36, 204
224, 241
78, 81, 89
79, 101

80, 101, 352

83, 92, 93, 104, 330, 426

84, 86, 96, 111, 4138

80, 86, 91, 110, 113, 408, 413
“ s . : = 94
° - 835

f : “ oe 88%

‘ - 70

: : 78, 74, 77

" - : 74.

- 74, 77

88

"36, 100, 114, 414

. 413, 429

5 . . oe

e . 101

C ° - 428

: ome

: BAR IPA),

: 120

15, 76, 78, 138

492 INDEX.

Ploughing, Depth of, . : ° . °

Subsoil, . = ° A °
Rules of, . é ' - -
Pork, Profits of, A :

Weight of, on given qnuntity of food,
Prices of, how regulated, . - °
Potato, History of the, ° 5 ° .
Uses of the, . S A ¢ “

Kind and Size for planting, . .
Diseases of the, . - . .
Poultry, increased attention to, . f A

Root Crops, P - - “ . e
Rotation of Crops, . 6 - . °
Ruta-Bagas, Yield of, - ; ( :
Rye, Cost of cultivating, . . : .

Sheep, Different breeds of, . : 4 '
Stock, Raising for special purposes, . .
Milking qualities of the Jersey, .
Want of system in breeding, . .

Experiments in feeding, . . .
Mode of feeding in Rien . .
Study of Soils, . = - .

Super-phosphate of Lime, sepasieltiids oi

Swamps, improvement of by growing potatoes, .

Swine, different breeds of, . = “

Treatment of, . 4 0 5 °
Points of good, . . . .
Food for, - < = - c
Breeding of, . . : < .
Tan, as a Manure, ; ; - - ;
Trees, purchase of, . : ' - ;
Manure and wash for, . ; 5
Mode of planting, . . . .
Iron around, . : . . °

Shape of, . : ° . ° °
Mulching, . . . . :
Forest, . : . . 5
Mode of planting,
Turnips, value of, . 5 ° : :

Walls, trenches under, * 4 - :
‘Wheat, Statements on, - 7 6 °
Wood, Raising of, . E - - A

80, 82, $4

Page.

125, 128, 129
° 27, 133
° . 184
e 7) 308
. - 3868
5 Pn)
° - 208
: 212
. 215, 220
A oy ee
: Ae eotsll
207
° - 260
’ 240, 241
° . 295
. 359, 361
° 5 ite)
° 270, 272
- 287,280
. 84%, 888
: - 344
- 459

141, 146

14, 46, 58, 60
364, 366, 368

- 3866, 372
’ - 862
’ a cars
: yf!

2 yuep

11, 103, 413

, 89, 95, 96, 99, 100
2, 110, 112, 413

. 96, 100
oN. 163) e
. 104, 112
. 115, 483
2° Gags
é 6 28
r 17

187

483

a

; n Git J i ae

-

etree. vets b,

' .
ees. fo

a
i pee wee |) ie F .
fies ‘tea Me VGA
5 Y
si a iff my a vee

2)
| ,0¢
'
oe
~~ & : .
ee
‘ od” Vw
ha 4 % 1
TPAD. 7 oe | -
o o¢
Miah le -
ay,
i Sr a eer
bet an ¢
A ‘a 2 ;
OU De ww ‘ ’
>
i] . ¥
wr
&
’ 4
sy

4
it)
§ «
j i
'
nl ; iT
y : 7
RI
1 A uri * '
4 | Hi y
Me “ar | y = y i ie ‘
iN ' ;
a x F : ne in mes | <
i wae. A. mv i
A) ha ers
I nO mi 7:
| ai eh me ee a

‘.

i

am

sass

oy

Pe ua
ey |

vo lk

Ss tee

New York Botanical Garden

NL

185 00258 5634

nen = Rae aut