Skip to main content

Full text of "Another defence of the unity, wherein St. John's introduction to his Gospel and his account of the Word's being made flesh are considered : with a few remarks on some ... publications, particularly those of Dr. Benjamin Dawson, and Dr. Kennicot .."

See other formats


^'^ 


a? 


^01 


3    L/iecuatv  odfcarv  L/~erL(i  ^^f^Jf^  iJpTH^h^ 

S    \ym  nx entail h{  c^^  xfyuea-'U/yi^ 


^^iTK^ 


//  .    X  Cu^lavtj  Co'nfro^eryj(^/^J^^^^ucJ^'^'^<^^^ 


Digitized  by  tine  Internet  Arciiive 

in  2011  witii  funding  from 

Princeton  Theological  Seminary  Library 


http://www.archive.org/details/anotherdefenceofOOflem 


ANOTHER 

DEFENCE 

O  F    T  H  E 

UNITY, 

WHEREIN 

St.  John's  Introdudion  to  his  Gofpel,  and  his 
Account  of  the  Word's  being  made  Flejl.\ 
are  confidered. 

WITH 

A  few  Remarks  on  fome  very  late  notable 
Publications,  particularly  thofe  of  Dr.  Ben- 
jamin Dawson,  and  Dr.  Kennicot. 

A>vX*    n.ur;    «?   ©sc?   o   "Tramp  >'-«!    «?  Kvpiog 


LONDON: 

Printed  for  T.  Longman,  in  Pater-nofler-Row.   ^ 
M  DCC  LXVI. 


] 


PREFATORY    ADDRESS 

T  O    T  H  E 

READER. 


A 


Very  elegant  ivrlter  has  obferv- 
**  /  \  ed,  that  "  though  the  articles 
of  religious  belief,  which  fall 
"  within  the  comprehenfion  of  mankind, 
"  and  feem  eflential  to  their  happinefs,  are 
"  few  and  fimple  -,  yet  ingenious  men  have 
"  contrived  to  eredt  them  into  a  moil  tre- 
"  mendous  fyftem  of  metaphyseal  fubtilty, 
**  which  will  long  remain  a  monument  of 
*'  the  extent  and  weaknefs  of  human  un- 
"  derftanding. — By  attempting  to  eftablilli 
"  too  much,  they  have  hurt  the  foundation 
"  of  the  moft  interefling  principles  of  re- 

"  ligion." 

And  agaijiy  he  fays, — "  that  religion  con- 

"  fidered  as  a  fcience,  in  the  manner  it  has 

**  been  ufually  condud;ed,  is  but  little  be- 

A  2  *'  neficial 


<c 


iv       A  prefatory  Addrefs  to  the  Reader, 

'*  neficial  to  mankind,  neither  tending  to 
"  enlarge  the  underilanding,  fweeten  the 
*'  temper,  nor  mend  the  heart.  At  the 
"  fame  time  the  labours  of  ingenious  men, 

in  explaining  obfcure  and  difficult  paf- 
"  fages  of  facred  writ,  have  been  highly 
"  ufeful  and  necellary.  And  as  it  is  na- 
"  tural  for  men  to  carry  their  fpeculations 
"  on  a  fubjedt,  that  fo  nearly  concerns  their 
"  prefent  and  eternal  happinefs,  farther  than 
"  reafon  extends,  or  than  is  clearly  and  ex- 
"  prefsly  revealed  j  e'-oen  thefe  can  be  fol- 
*^  lowed  by  no  bad  confequences,  if  they 
"  are  carried  on  with  that  modefty  and 
"  reverence  which  the  fubjed  requires. 
*'  They  only  become  pernicious  when  they 
"  are  formed  into  fyjlemsy  to  which  the  fame 
"  credit  and  fubmiffion  is  required  as  to 
**  holy  writ  itfelf  *". 

In  many  of  the  things  advanced,  in  his 
comparative  vieiVy  I  agree  with  this  writer. 
— And  now  refer  my  reader  to  a  late  very 
fmgular  publication,  which  would  prove 
from  Scripture,  the  following  propodtions, 

*  A  c:>:np(irative  %<uw  of  the  Jlate  and  faculties  of 
riion,  ir'c.  p.  177  &  183. 

in 


A  prefatory  Addrefs  to  the  Reader,       v 

in  fupport  of  the  prefent  eftablifhed  Li- 
turgy. 

"  I  ft,  That  he  who  redeemed  us  was 
**  very  God,  manifefted  in  the  flefh,  not 
**  the  firft  of  created  beings  united  to  an 
**  human  body,  nor  a  mere  man  in  whom 
*^  the  fulnefs  of  the  Godhead  dwelt  not." 

**  2dly,  That  Jefus  Chrift  was  indeed 
"  perfect  man,  of  a  reafonable  foul  and 
"  human  fle(h  fubfifting  3  but  that  man  in 
"  whom  God  himfelf,  and  no  other  being, 
"  in  nature  inferior  dwelt." 

"  3dly,  That  the  holy  ghoft  is  of  a  na- 
^*  ture  perfedly  divine ;  not  a  diftincfl  and 
**  feparate  nature  from  the  Father  almighty, 
*'  inferior  both  to  him  and  the  Son,  but 
"  true  and  very  God  j  or,  in  other  words, 
"  that  he,  who  hath  fandtified,  is  one  and 
**  the  fame  God  with  him  that  created  and 
*'  redeemed  us  *." 

The  reafon  of  my  making  this  citation, 
is,  to  fhew,  that  if  fuch  an  interpretation 
of  Scripture  can  be  brought  in  defence  of 
an  eftahlified  Liturgy^  by  a  conforming  di- 

*  Dr.  Ben'Jamin  Dawson's  Ulujlrahovs  of  fcv:ral 
i(xU  of  fcr'tpiure,  &c.  A.  D,  i;66. 

vine ', 


vi      A  prefatory  Addrefs  to  the  Reader, 

vine  ;  the  following  confiderations  upon  the 
Wordy  and  upon  the  Word's  being  made  jlejhy 
can  never  give  the  leaft  reafonable  offence 
to  the  Sons  of  our  church. 

Much  light  had  before  been  thrown  on 
the  fubjedl,  by  the  late  reverend  and  learned 
Mr.  Moses  Lowman  j  in  his  three  trads, 
T7Z.' — "  on  the  appearances  of  the  true  God, 
"  under  the  old  teftament — on  the  Shecbi- 
*'  «j^;  — and  on  the  texts  of  Scripture  re- 

"  lating  to  the  Logos." Which  trads 

were  publifhed  in  the  year  1756. 

Since  then,  another  very  learned  and  ju- 
dicious traft  favoured  the  public,  under  the 
title  of,  a  Letter  writ  in  the  year  1730.  con- 
cerning the  queftion,  *'  whether  the  Lo- 
*'  Gos  fupplied  the  place  of  ^  human  foul 
*'  in  the  perfon  of  Jefus  Chrifl  ?"  which 
made  its  firft  open  appearance,  in  the  year 
1759.  and  which  indeed  has  great  merit, 
both  from  the  candour,  perfpicuity  and 
weight  of  the  argument. 

What  is  now  offered,  I  truft,  is,  in  har- 
mony with  the  defign  of  thefc  publications, 
tho'  with  fome  peculiarity  of  interpretation. 
And  the  Author,  in  defence  of  them  and 

himielf, 

3 


A  prefatory  Address  to  the  Reader,     vii 

himfelf,  would  take  the  liberty  of  adopting 
what  a  man  of  genius  has  faid  of  art^  and 
fciences,  as  applicable  to  the  religious  prc- 
feflion.  "  No  fcience,  fays  he,  ever  flourifli- 
"  ed,  while  it  was  confined  to  a  fet  of  men 
"  who  lived  by  it,  as  a  profeffion.  Such 
**  men  have  purfuits  very  different  from  the 
**  end  and  defign  of  it.  The  interefted 
*'  views  of  a  trade  are  far  different  from  the 
**  enlarged  and  different  profpedis  of  ge- 
"  nius  and  fcience.—  When  the  knowledge 
*'  of  an  art  is  confined  in  this  manner, 
«  every  private  practitioner  mufl  attend  to 
"  the  general  principles  of  his  craft  j  or 
*^  ftarve.  If  he  goes  out  of  the  common 
"  path,  he  is  an  objedl  of  the  jealoufy  and 
*^  abufe  of  his  brethren,  and  among  the 
"  reft  of  mankind  he  can  neither  find  judges 
**  nor  patrons." 

Thefe  fine  obfervations  made  upon  arts 
and  fciences,  are  extremely  applicable  to 
the  religious  profeffion ;  and  hence  fo  few 
have  dared  to  make  an  open  defence  of 
the  UNITY. 

This  publication  would  have  had  no  place, 
had  not  the  Author  been  of  opinion,  that  it  is 

in 


viii    A  prefatory  Addrefs  to  the  Reader, 

in  fome  degree,  calculated  to  the  end  of  re- 
ftoring  an  almoft  loft  idea  of  the  Scripture 
dodtrine  of  the  one  God-,  which  lofs  has  fad- 
ly  depraved  the  tempers  of  mankind. — For, 
fays  the  above  writer,  "  the  worft  effedts 
"  of  controverfial  theology  are  thofe,  which 
"  it  produces  on  the  temper  and  affections. 
«  — When  the  mind  is  kept  conftantly  em- 
"  barraffed  in  a  thorny  path,  where  it  can 
**  find  no  fteady  light  to  fhew  the  way,  nor 
"  foundation  to  reft  upon,  the  temper  lofes 
"  its  native  chearfulnefs,  and  contracts  a 
**  gloom  and  feverity,  partly  from  the  cha- 
"  grin  of  difappointment,  and  partly  from 
**  the  focial  and  kind  affedions  being  extin- 
"  guifhed  for  want  of  exercife. — Which 
"  evil  has  been  exafperated,  when  men  have 
"  been  perfuaded,  that  their  holding  cer- 
"  tain  opinions  intitled  them  to  the  divine 
"  favour  5  and  that  thofe  who  differed  from 
"  them,  were  devoted  to  deftrudion  *."  See 
the  QuicuNQUE  vuLT,  in  its  damnatory 
claufes  J  and  alfo  the  creed  of  popifh  and 
other  fanatics. 

*  A  comparaihe  vkzv^  Jcc.  p.  i8o,  i8i, 

CON- 


CONSIDERATIONS 


O  N    T  H  E 


LOGOS. 


WHAT  has  occafioned  fo  much 
controverfy  concerning  the  Lo- 
gos, or  Word  of  Gody  among 
chriflian  divines,  feems  principally  to  have 
been,  "  an  apprehended  difficulty  in  the 
"  mtrodu6lion  to  St.  John's  Gofpel." — Com- 
i?ientators  are  much  difagreed  in  their  inter- 
pretations. And  what  fliould  be  the  precife 
fenie  of  the  Logos,  has  been  the  warm 
difpute  of  ages.  If  therefore  a  confident, 
eafy,  and  clear  reading  can  be  given  to  this, 
we  may  hope,  that  every  difficulty  or  ob- 
fcurity,  fuppofed  to  lye  upon  that  intro- 
dudlion,  will  remove. 

Now  the  Logos  or  Wo?'d  of  Gody  in  the 

language   of  the   facred   books   of  the   old 

teftament,  does  denote,    (as  fhall  prefently 

be  fhewn,)  '^  the  exprefs  manifeftative  will 

B  "  of 


2       Considerations  on  the  Logos. 

"  of  God,  whenever  made,  or  in  whatever 
"  manner." — And  thus  underftood,  it  is  as 
well  conceived  of  when  creating,  as  it  is 
when  fuccouring,  or  when  informing  and 
correding  his  moral  creation.-^— Hence  when 
St.  ychn  opens  his  hiftory,  he  very  perti- 
nently fays, — in  the  beginning  was  the  Word, 
and  the  V/ord  was  with  Gody  ajid  the  Word 
was  God.  The  fame  was  in  the  beginning 
with  God.  All  things  were  made  b^  him, 
and  without  him  was  not  any  thing  made  that 
was  made. — There  is  no  kind  of  difficulty 
found  in  this  reprefentation ;  for  the  mani- 
feftative  will  of  God,  was  not  only  in  the 
beginnings  but  had  been  ever  with  God,  and 
muft  be  venerated,  as  God  ^  even  becaufe 
it  is  the  exprefs  manifeftation  of  God.  This 
very  fame  idea  St.  Paid  conveys,  when  he 
obferves,  that  the  invijible  things  of  hi?n  fro?n 
the  creation  of  the  world  are  clearly  feen,  be- 
ing underftood  by  the  things  that  are  madi^ 
even  his  eternal  power  and  godhead.  In  which 
obvious  fenfe,  the  Word  may  be  faid  to 
be  God,  and  alfo  to  be  in  the  beginning 
with  him  ;  inafmuch  as  all  things  were  made 
by  him  -,  and  without  him^  was  not  miy  thing 

made 


Considerations  on  the  Logos.     3 

made  that  ivas  fnade.  In  other  words,  not 
any  thing  could  come  into  exigence,  but 
what  would  manifeft  the  will  of  the  crea- 
tov. 

The  Evangelift  rifes  in  his  reprefentation 
pf  the  Word.  In  him  was  life,  and  the 
life  was  the  light  of  men :  i.  e.  he  has  been 
made  manifeft,  as  the  infinite  fource  of  life 
and  lights  to  all  his  intelligent  creation  *.  He, 
as  a  governor  of  moral  agents,  made  him- 
felf  known  to  our  world,  by  confulting  the 
life  of  men,  in  all  the  maxims  of  his  rule. — 
But  the  light  fnneth  in  darknefs^  and  the 
darknefs  comprehended  it  not. — Even  the  di- 
vine light  of  prophecy,  which  had,  from 
the  beginning,  foretold  the  moft  deiireable 
age  of  the  MeJJiah,  had  been  fo  egregioully 
perverted,  that  the  Jewifh  nation  had  loft  the 
benefit  of  that  heavenly  illumination.  The 
world  was  become  fo  very  blind,  by  prejudice 
and  vice,  as  to  reject  the  divine  evidence. 

Neverthelefs,  there  was  a  man  fent  from 

God,  whofe  name  was  John.     Tihe  fame  ca?ne 

for  a  witnefSi  to   bear  wilnefs   of  the  light.. 

that  all  men  through  him  might  believe :  tho' 

*  See  tht  Jpprr,4if^', 

B  2  U 


4       Considerations  on  the  Logos. 

he  was  not  that  light  j  which  mankind  either 
formerly  had,  or  were  encouraged  to  expedt, 
and  hope  for  ;  hut  was  fent  to  bear  witnefs 
of  that  light.  That  was  the  true  light,  which 
lighteth  every  man  that  cometh  into  the  world. 
• — And  yet  he,  the  Word  of  God,  was  in 
the  world,  and  the  world  was  made  by  him, 
and  the  world  knew  him  not.  So  depraved, 
fo  ignorant  were  the  pagan  idolatrous  na- 
tions, as  not  to  infer  his  eternal  power  and 
godhead,  from  the  vifible  creation.  The 
very  idea  of  a  creator,  was  banifhed  from 
a  great  part  of  the  human  family.  Nay,  he 
ca?72e  to  his  own,  and  his  own  received  him 
net ;  but  as  many  as  did  receive  him,  to  them 
gave  he  power,  i.  c.  a  right  or  privilege, 
CO  become  -the  Sotis  of  God,  eve?!  to  them  that 
believe  on  his  name. 

Old  Teftament  Scriptures  do  contain  a  con- 
vincing record  of  the  truth  of  this  report, 
concerning  the  divine  JVord-,  inalmuch  as 
the  Jevvifh  nation,  whom  God  had  fepa- 
rated  from  the  reft  of  mankind,  as  a  pe- 
culiar people,  did  retain  fuch  an  amazing 
perverfcnels,  under  all  the  appearances  of 
God  for  them,  that  fundry  prophets  com- 

plaii^ 


Considerations  on  the  Logos.      5 

plain  bitterly  of  their  notorious  infidelity 
and  flagrant  impiety.  Neverthelefs,  there 
were  fome  of  them  that  were  much  more 
feniible,  ingenuous,  and  obedient  j — and  to 
thefe,  it  were,  that  he  gave  the  privilege  of 
Sons. — So  St.  Paul  obferves,  that  they  are 
not  all  Ifraelj  which  were  of  Ifrael.  Rom. 
ix.  6. — We  are  next  told  in  what  manner, 
or  upon  what  principle  they  obtained  a  fi- 
liation J — which  were  borUy  not  of  bloody 
I.  e.  not  becaufe  of  their  being  the  natural 
defcendants  of  Abraham  3 — nor  of  the  will 
of  the  flefiy  I.  e.  not  becaufe  they  had  been 
obfervant  of  carnal  ordinances  j  or  had  been 
circumcifed  :  neither  were  they  born  of  the 
will  of  man ;  i.  e.  not  by  reafon  of  the  re- 
verence they  had  fhewn  to  the  traditions  of 
their  elders  ^  but  they  were  honoured  with 
this  filiation,  from  the  obedience  which  they 
had  fliewn  to  the  will  of  God, 

This  appears,  to  me,  the  mofl  natural 
and  obvious  fenfe  of  the  Evangelift ;  and 
at  once  determines  the  teachings  of  the  di- 
vine Word  to  the  Hebrew  people,  as  pre? 
cifely  intended  in  'this  defcription.« — In  like 
planner,  all  who  did  receive  the  Harbin- 
ger's 


6     Considerations  on  the  Logos. 

ger's  teftimony  to  the  voice  of  prophecy,  did 
alfo  become  the  Sons  of  God.  — The  hiftorian, 
next  introduces  the  fliechinizing  of  the 
Word,  in  the  perfon  of  Jefus  Chriftj  which 
he  thus  exprefTes — and  the  Word  was  made 
jlefi  and  dwelt  among  iiSj  and  we  beheld  his 
glory,  as  the  glory  of  the  07ily  begotten  of  the 
Father  J  full  of  grace  and  timth." 

Several  diflindl  inquiries  fliould  be  made, 
if  we  would,  with  any  precifion,  affix  the 
dodrinal  meaning  of  this  defcription.  Such 
as  eflablifliing, 

ift  The  true  fenfe  of  the  Logos^  or  Word* 

sdly,  Of  its  being  made  flejQi,  and  dwel- 
ling among  us. 

3dly,  Wherein  the  glory  of  the  only  ber 
gotten  of  the  Father  did  confift. 

4thly,  What  St.  John  meaneth,  when  he 
fays,  and  we  beheld  his  glory  f 

I  ft,  It  has  been  already  affirmed,  that  the 
term,  Logos,  or  Word,  is  ufed  by  the  Evan- 
gelift,  for  the  manifefative  will  of  God,  how- 
ever, or  whe?iever  ??2ade.  Now,  there  is  not 
any  thing  more  common,  in  the  Hebrew 
Scriptures,  than  this  phrafe,  the  Word,  the 
fVbrd  of  God,  or  the  JVord  of  the  Lord,  to 
5  exprefs 


Considerations  on  the  Logos.     7 

exprefs  the  will  either  of  the  creator,  pre- 
fen^er,  or  governor  of  the  world.  Pf.  xxxiii. 
6.  by  the  Word  of  the  Lord  ivere  the  heavens 
made,  and  all  the  hefts  of  them  by  the  breath 
of  his  mouth,  cxlviii.  5.  praife  the  name  of 
the  hord^  for  he  commanded^  and  they  wen: 
created. 

The  very  miracles  by  which  Pharaoh  was 
tried,  performed  by  the  inftrumentality  of 
Mcfes,  are  called,  the  Word  of  the  Lord  5 
Pf.  cv.  19.  until  the  time  that  tJye  Word  of 
the  Lord  ca?ne  j  the  Word  of  the  Lord  tried 
him.  And  when  God  had  wrought  de- 
liverance for  Ifrael,  he  is  faid  to  fend  his 
Word.  Pf  cvii.  20.  he  fent  his  Word,  andheaU 
ed  them,  and  delivered  them  from  their  de- 
f?-u5lions.  The  different  appearances  of  na- 
ture, in  the  plan  of  providence,  are  a- 
fcribed  to  the  Word  of  God.  cxlviii.  18. 
when  the  ice  was  cajl  forth  from  the  cloud  as 
morfels,  he  fendeth  out  his  Word  and  melteth 
them. 

The  phrafe  is  common  to  all  the  prophets ; 
they  are  wont  to  call  the  meffages  which 
they  deliver,  the  Word  of  God. — So  i  Sam.ix. 
27.    Samuel  fays  to  Saul,  Stand  fill  to^ 

day^ 


S     Considerations  on  the  Logos'. 

day,  that  I  may  fiew  thee  the  JVord  of  God.^^ 
i  Kings  xii.  22.  the  Word  of  God  came  to 
Shemaiah.  The  Word  of  God  came  to  Na- 
than, faying :  And  it  is  the  ulual  addrefs 
of  EzEKiEL, — the  Word  of  the  Lord  came 
unto  me.  It  would  be  endlefs  to  cite  all  the 
places,  where  the  Word  of  God,  or  the  Word 
of  the  Lord,  is  ufed  to  denote,  his  manifejl^ 
ative  ivill.  It  is  almofl  every  where  to  be 
found,  in  the  facred  fcriptures ;  and  will 
fully  juftify  this  Evangelift,  in  making  ufe 
of  a  term  fo  very  familiar  to  the  Jews ;  and 
which  never  could  be  miftaken  by  any  who 
were  at  all  acquainted  with  their  writings. 

We  accordingly  find  the  Apoftle,  vv^hen 
writing  to  the  Hebrew  chriflians,  thus  be- 
ginning his  epiftle,  by  fl:»ewing  them,  "that 
*'  it  was  the  very  fame  Word  of  God  by 
*'  which  the  worlds  were  made,  that  had 
*'  fpoken,  at  fundry  times  and  in  divers 
"  manners,  to  the  fathers  by  the  prophets ; 
**  and  in  thefe  laft  days,  by  his  Son."  q.  d. 
The  Gofpel  makes  a  revelation  of  the  will 
of  no  other  being,  than  of  him  who  made 
all  things,  and  who  has  been  inftruding 
mankind  from  the  beginning,     Methinks, 

this 


CoNSinERATIONS   ON   THE   LoGOS.  9 

this  may  be  llifficient  to  affix  the  fenfe  of 
the  term,  Logos,  or  Wordj  Word  of  God,  or 
JVord  of  the  Lord. 

The  next  inquiry  will  be,  in  what  fenfe 
the  JVord  was  made  flep  ? 

It  is  an  undoubted  truth,  ih^ifefi,  or  the 
nian  ChriflJefuSj  was  made  by  xhcLogos,  or 
by  the  V/ord  of  God :  for  it  was  the  power  of 
the  higheft.  that  did  create  or  fonn  him,  in 
the  womb  of  the  virg;in.  So  Mary  his  mo- 
ther was  alTured  it  fliould  be,  from  that  fame 
divine  Word  which  fpake  by  the  angel, — ^ 
That  theo/i^r^  was  God  himfelf,  has  been 
fliewn  from  ver..  i .  "  where  St.  fdhn  ufeth  a 
*'  gradation.  Firii  lie  fays,  the  Word  was 
'^  always,  before  all  time.  Then  he  adds, 
*^  and  was  with  God -^  and  lafily,  that  he  was 
*'  God  himfelf  *."  But  fays  a  conforming 
divine,,  '^  and  God  was  the  JVcrd-f  -,"  when  we 
have  thefe  decifwe  readings  of  the  Wordy  it 
furely  would  not  be  fo  very  intelligible  to  fay, 
and  flejhy  that  is,  a  man  became  the  Word  and. 


*  Letter  zvrit  in  the  year  1730.  p.  24. 
f  r?r.  Dawson's  illuftration?,  p.  59. 


dwelt 


10.    Considerations  on  the  Logos, 

d^'Ji'elt  among  us  *.  Could  flefh  or  a  man  be- 
come God  ?  methinks,  that  muft  be  utterly 
inconceivable,  xa;  o  Ao^o5  o-ap^  g^gxo,  can. 
never  have  fuch  meaning, — God  could  not  be 
inade  man  j  nor  could  he  take  upon  him  the 
human  nature  ;  tho'  the  man  Jefus,  the  Mef^ 
fmh,  had  the  Word,  that  is,  the  wifdom  and 
power  of  God,  reliding  with  him.  The 
manifeilative  will  of  God,  called,  the  Wordy 
could  no  otherwife  be  made  flefli,  than  as 
it  fo  relided  with  the  man  Chrift  Jefus.  He 
was  made  the  Shechmahy  or  temple  of  God  5 
the  divine  prefence  with  him,  was  oracular  : 
or,  he  fet  his  tdbernacle  in  fleOi,  according 
to  I  Kings  \\\u  27.  compared  with  Jlpoc.  xxi. 
3.  The  refidence  of  the  Logos  with  Jefus 
Chrift  was  fo  intimate  and  expreffive,  as  to 
iuftify  St.  johfiy  in  faying,  the  Word  was 
made  fiefiy  and  dwelt  among  us.  Deity  was, 
by  him,  fo  fully  declared,  or  made  mani- 
fefl:  in  his  paternal  truth  and  grace,  that  our 
Lord  fays  to  Philips  "  vvhofoever  hath  feen 
'*  me,  hath   ktn  the  Father."     And  yet, 

*  Dr.  Daws-on's  illuftrations,  p.  72,  &  100. 

in 


Considerations  on  the  Logos,     ii 

in  fair  conftru6tion,  Philip  could  not  fup- 
pofe,  tfjat  Jei'iis  Cbrijl  was  the  Father  :  but 
only,  that  the  mod:  exprefllve  revelation  of 
the  Father,  was  made  by  him. 

When  therefore  the  E^anselifl:  fays,  that 
the  Word  ivas  made  JieJJ;),  aiid  dwelt  among 
us,  he  would  not  be  underftood  to  mean, 
that  the  JVord  was  converted  into  flefh  j  or, 
that  it  became  a  man  -,  or,  that  the  Word  did 
conftitute  any  part  of  the  perfon  of  the  maa 
Chrift  Jefus  j  tho'  it  had  the  moft  expreilive 
and  illuflrious  abode  with  him.  The  Deity 
could  not  poffibly  fuffer  any  change,  or  the 
leaft  fl^adow  of  change. 

Ameliiiiy  a  platonic  philofopher  and  difci- 
ple  of  Flotinus,  of  whom  Eufebius  makes 
mention,  has  this  interpretation  of  St.  yohns. 
introduciiGn, — *'  and  this,  plainly,,  was  the 
*'  Word  by  whom,  he  being  himfelf  eter- 
"  nal,  were  made  all  things  that  are,  as 
"  Heraclitus  alfo  would  fay  :  and  by  Jove 
"  the  fame,  whom  the  Barharia?i  affirms 
"  to  have  been  in  the  place  and  dignity  of 
"  a  principle,  and  to  be  with  God,  and  to 
"  be  God  :  by  whom  all  things  were  made, 
**  and  in  whom  every  thing  that  was  made 
C  2  "  has 


-12     Considerations  on  the  Logos. 

"  has  its  life  and  being.  Who  defcending 
*'  into  body,  and  putting  on  flefh,  took  the 
*^  form  of  man  :  tho'  even  then  he  gave 
"  proof  of  the  majedy  of  his  nature  *." 

This  Heathen  feems  to  have  underflood 
St.  ^qIm  much  better  than  many  chriftians 
have  done  :  tho'  he  calls  him  Barhariariy 
becaufe  he  was  a  ^cw  who  wrote  in  Greek. 

But,  at  the  fame  time,  one  may  perceive 
how  the  platonic  Philofophers  miftook  the 
true  fenfe  of  the  U^rd's  being  made  flefi. — 
*' Defcending  into  body,  and  putting  on  flefh," 
don't  appear  to  convey  St.  Johns  fenfe,  as 
fliall  be  farther  (liewn. 

That  the  Word  did  not  become  any  part 
of  the  perfon  of  Chrifl,  is  evident,  from  his 
ever  afcribing  his  fupernatural  difcernment, 
his  all-penetrating  knowledge,  his  aflonifh- 
ing  wifdom  and  power,  to  the  Father !  he 
never  once  appropriates  any  divine  property 
or  perfedion  to  himfeif-f-.  For  tho'  he 
once  fays,  I  and  the  Father  are  one  -, — ^yet, 

*  Dr.  Lardn'er's  pagan  teftimonles,  vol.  III.  p, 
96,  97. 

t'  Sec  Matth.  xix.  17,     John  v,  19,  30. — viii.  28. 

he 


Considerations  on  thz  Logos,'      13 

he  intended  not  to  affert  an  effential  or  per- 
ibnal  onenefs ;  but  only,  that  he  did  the 
'-jiiorks  of  his  Father ,  and  did  receive  the  doc- 
trine ^  iDbich  he  taught^  from  him.  This  will 
undeniably  appear,  to  be  his  meaning,  when 
fohn  X.  30.  IS  diligently  compared  with  verfes, 
37th  and  38di. 

The  Logos^  or  Word,  was  fo  far  from  be- 
ing the  foul  of  Chrift,  as  fome  have  ima- 
gined, that  he  exprefsly  denies  he  had  any 
divine  abilities,  but  what  were  his  Father's  : 
cf  himjelf  he  could  do  nothing, — And  we  might 
as  truly  fay,  that  the  Logos  or  Word,  be- 
came the  perfon  of  Mofes,  of  Elijah,  or  of 
any  of  the  prophets,  as  that  it  became  the 
foul  of  the  man  Chrift  Jefus ;  elfe,  we  might 
equally  fay,  that  the  perfon  of  Mofes  be- 
came the  JVord,  as  that  the  perfon  of  Chrift 
became  the  Word. 

That  his  name  was  called,  Emanuel, 
i.  e.  God  'with  us,  will  be  of  very  eafy  con- 
ception, on  account  of  that  moft  exprefs  and 
fignificant  abode  which  the  Word  of  God 
had  with  him  *.     So  confident  was  he  of 

*  Hence  his  name  Is  called,  the  7f^6rd  of  God. 
Apoc,  xix.  13. 

this 


14     Considerations  on  the  Logos. 

this  expreffive  prefence  of  the  Father  with 
him,  that  he  fays  to  Philipy  Believeji  thou 
not  that  I  am  in  the  Father  and  the  Father  in 
me  ^  the  words  that  I  fpeak  unto  youy  I  /peak 
tiot  of  niyfelf :  but  the  Fat  her  that  dwelleth  in 
mey  he  doeth  the  works.  John  xiv.  i  o.— And 
when  he  afferts  the  infalhbility  of  the  judg- 
jnent  which  he  gave  of  men   and  things, 
Chap.  viii.  i6.  he  affigns  this  reafbn  for  it,— 
/  am  not  alone ,  but  I  and  the  Father  that  fent 
me^   And  at  ver.  xxix.  he  that  fent  me  is  with 
me  :  the  Father  hath  not  left  me  alone,  for  I 
do  always  thofe  things  that  pleafe  him.     Nay, 
he  thus  comforts  himfelf,  when   taking   a 
prophetic  profpe6l  of  his  being  forfaken  of 
all  the  difciples,  John  xvi.  32.     Behold  the 
hour  Cometh^  yea^  is  now  come,  that  ye  fiall 
be  fcattered  every  one  to  his  own,  and  flail 
leave  me  alone :  and  yet  I  am  not  alone,  he^ 
caufe  the  Father  is  with  me.     Thus  we  can 
conceive  of  the  Word's  being  made  fleflo,  as  it 
abode  fo  illuHrioufly  in,  or  with  the  perfon 
of  the  man  Chrift  Jefus. 

In  this  difquifitlon,  we  are  3dly  to  in- 
quire, in  what  it  was  that  the  glory  did  con- 
iiil:  ?  for  St.  fohn  faySj  and  we  beheld  his  glory, 

as 


Considerations  on  the  Logos.     15 

m  the  glory  of  the  only  begotten  of  the 
Father i  full  of  grace  and  truth. 

Now  the  glofj  of  any  being  or  thing,  Is 
the  perfedlion  or  the  excellence  of  its  nature 
and  properties,  difcoverable  by  fome  manifefl:- 
ation  made  of  that  excellence.— But  the  re- 
fidence  of  the  Logos  or  Word  with  the  man 
Chrill:  Jefus,  revealing  the  truth  and  grace 
of  God  to  mankind,  was,  what  rendered 
him  fo  diftinguidiingly  and  {o  peculiarly  il- 
luftrious,  as  to  be  called,  the  only  begot- 
ten of  the  Father. — Now,  to  be  begotten  of 
God,  in  the  fenfe  of  this  writer,  is,  to  be 
prevailed  upon  by  his  teachings,  to  exprefs  a 
cordial  devotednefs,  to  all  his  will.  Thus, 
in  his  mtrodiiSiiony  he  fpeaks  of  men  having 
the  privilege  of  Sons,  who  were  born  of  God, 
by  their  doing  of  his  will. — i,  e.  by  ingenuoufly 
receiving  the  inftrudions  that  were  given 
them,  from  the  Logos  or  Word  of  God. 

Whereas  Jefus  Chrifl  is  the  only  begotten  of 
the  Father  J  as  he  was  diflinguillied  froai  all 
mankind  by  prophecy  and  by  his  formation  3 
by  his  finlefs,  and  moft  perfedl  obedience  and 
unreferved  devotednefs  to  all  his  Father's  will ; 
alfo  by  miracle  !  for  we  are  to  keep  in  mind, 

that 


i6     Considerations  on  the  Logos, 

that  when  St.  'JoJm  wrote  his  Gofpel,  the 
moft  complete  teftimony  had  been  adually  . 
and  extenfively  given  to  his  divine  charader 
and  miflion.  For,  verily,  he  had  been 
greatly  diilinguiihed  by  ;%/7j,  ivonders,  and 
divers  miracles  !  *'  God  having  anointed  Je- 
"  fiis  of  Nazareth  with  the  holy  ghoft  and 
*^  with  power,  who  went  about  doing  good, 
"  and  healing  all  that  were  opprefied  of  the 
"  devils  for- God  was  with  him."  as  St. 
Peter  bore  an  exprefs  record,  ABs  x.  38. — 
But  befides  all  this  tcflinionv,  thofe  divine 
gifts  which  he  had  promifed,  had  been  a- 
bundantly  beflowed  on  his  apoftles,  as  the 
writer  to  the  Hebrew  Ghriflians  remarks, — - 
'*  God  had  alio  born  them  witnefs,  both 
"  with  figns  and  wonders,  and  with  divers 
**  miracles,  and  gifts  of  the  holy  ghoft." 
Chap.  ii.  4.  which  were  in  proof  of  their 
Lord's  being  exalted  to  the  right  hand  of 
power,  and  of  his  having  a  name  ad:ually 
given  him  above  every  name. 

Thus  is  it  made  manifefl:  that  Jefus  is  the 
ONLY  BEGOTTEN  of  the  Father  *.    And  be-^ 

*  See  Letter  writ  in  the  year  1730.  p.  29. — the  only 
begotten,  equivalent  to  well-betoved. 

caufe 


Considerations  on  the  Logos.     17 

caufe  of  his  exaltation  to  fovereignty  and  do- 
minion, St.  Peter  fpcaks  thus  of  him, — "  who 
"  is  gone  into  heaven,  and  is  at  the  right  hand 
"  of  God,  angels,  authorities  and  powers  be- 
*'  ing  made  fubjecl  to  him."  ift  Epiftle  ill. 
22.  And  for  the  reafbn  of  his  having  this  fu- 
premacy  given  him,  St.  Paul  reprefents  it 
as  a  CREATION,  wherein  this  image,  this 
reprefentative  of  the  invifible  God,  this  firfl- 
born,  this  moft  excellent  of  every  creature, 
has  the  fubjedion  of  all  things  made  to  him, 
*'  that  are  in  heaven  and  earth,  vifible  and 
"  invifible  j  whether  thrones,  or  dominions, 
*'  or  principalities,  or  powers,  all  things  are 
"  created  by  and  for  him — and  he  is  the 
"  head  of  the  body  the  church,  the  Jir/l- 
"  l^orn  from  the  dead,  that  in  all  things  he 
**  might  have  the  pre-eminence."    Col.  i.  15. 

All  things  thus  faid  to  be  created  by  him 
and  for  him,  I  fliould  underftand,  of  all 
dynaflies,  or  orders  of  power  being  put  un- 
der his  fceptre.  Mr.  Locke  has  fhewn, 
that  KriactvTi,  is  not  always  ufed  by  St.  Paul 
to  exprefs  creatiojiy  i.  e.  the  making  out  of 
nothing ;  for  he  ufes  the  word  for  the  bringing 
D  of 


1 8     Considerations  on  the  Logos. 

of  "Jew  and  Gentile  into  one  fociety,  or  fa- 
mily, Eph.  i.  15.  and  for  the  whole  new 
creation  under  Jefus  Chrift,  Chap.  iii.  9.  or 
he  fpeaks  of  the  work  of  redemption  by 
Chrifl,  as  a  new  creation.  See  his  notes 
on  the  texts  above.  And  as  juftly  and  rea- 
fonably  may  we  underfland  St.  Faul^  in  his 
epiftle  to  the  Colojfians^  as  having  only  in 
view  the  putting  of  the  feveral  dynafties  or 
orders  of  dignified  beings,  in  heaven  and 
earth,  under  tiie  fceptre  of  the  man  Chriil 
Jefus,  the  Shechinah  of  God. 

After  all,  fhould  any  be  of  opinion,  that 
Col,  i.  16.  and  Heb.  i.  2,  3.  mud  be  under- 
ftood  of  the  firil  creation  of  the  heavens  and 
of  the  earth  :  there  will  be  no  difficulty  in 
afcribing  fuch  creation  to  that  Logos  or  Word, 
which  tabernacled  with  the  man  Chrift  Je- 
fus. And  ib  underftood,  it  will  correfpond 
with  the  idea  of  this  Evangelift,  who  men- 
tions, in  his  introdu6tion,  the  creative  power 
of  the  Word  :  and  fays,  that  all  things  were 
made  by  hijn,  and  without  him  was  not  any 
thing  made,  that  was  made.  Is  not  fuch  in- 
terpretation much  more  reconcilable  with 
our  powers  of  conception  ^  and  is  it  not  that 

ia 


Considerations  on  the  Logos.     19 

in  which  we  can  have  far  more  complacen- 
cy, than  in  the  ftrange  opinion  of  Jefiis  Chrift, 
who  was  truly  man,  made  of  a  'woman ^  made 
under  tlx  hni\  yerojuLevov  ck  ywj(uy,(^  yivof^ivov 
vTo  vofjiGVy  being  reprefented,  as  the  creator  oj 
the  'world. 

The  Gofpel  is  a  revelation  or  manifeftation 
of  truth,  which  has  confulted  the  powers  of 
the  human  mind,  in  the  eafy  and  familiar 
reprefentation  ;  and  has  nothing  in  its  doc- 
trines that  would  perplex  and  confound. 
There  is  not  any  thing  intricate  or  myfteri- 
ous  in  this  laft  revelation.  Men  JImll  not 
teach  every  one  his  neighbour^  and  every  one  bis 
brother^  faying,  know  the  Lord  :  but  all 
fall  know  him,  from  the  leaf  to  the  greatefl. — 
It  is  then  fufficient,  that,  in  forming  our  ideas 
of  the  exaltation  of  ChriO:,  we  confider  him, 
as  placed  by  the  Logos,  or  by  the  expreffive 
will  of  God,  above  all  dynafties  or  orders  of 
power,  in  heaven  and  in  earth. 

Thefe-are  very  expreffive  reprefentations 

of  his  being  the  only  begotten  of  the  Father, 

full  of  grace  arid  truth.     -  -The  revelation 

u'hich  he  has  made  of  the  truth  and  grace 

D  2  of 


20     Considerations  on  the  Logos. 

of  God,  is,  that  which  gives  the  contents  of 
Gofpel  hiftory.  The  which,  whoever  will 
confult,  with  an  honed  mind,  and  a  fuit- 
able  degree  of  attention,  will  be  conftrained 
to  own,  that  there  is  a  plenitude  in  the  reve- 
lation. Nor  need  we  fcruple  to  affirm,  that 
there  is  alfo  an  excellence,  a  perfection,  a 
.glory  to  be  afcribed  to  this  difplay  of  the 
will  of  God.  We  muft  make  fuch  grate- 
ful acknowledgment  j  fince  all  other  me-^ 
thods  of  conveying  divine  inftrudion,  are 
found  to  fall  far  fhort  of  the  gofpel  demon- 
ftration,  given  us,  of  the  paternal  truth  and 
grace  of  God.  For  which  reafon,  this  hi- 
ftorian  adds,  that  710  ?}ian  has  fcen  God  at  any 
time ;  the  only  begotten  So?i,  which  is  in  the 
hofom  of  the  Father,  he  hath  declared  him. 

4thly,  It  will  not  be  of  difficult  con- 
ception, in  what  fenfe  St.  fchn  affirms,  and 
jwe  beheld  his  glory.  The  learned  and  vene- 
rable Author  of  the  Letter  writ  in  the  sear 
1730.  fays,  "  it  was  not  the  JVord,  which  St. 
*'  John  and  others  beheld,  but  Jefus,  in 
■'  whom  the  Word  dwelled.  Him  they  be- 
''  held.     And  his  greatnefs  was  confpicu- 


Considerations  on  the  Logos.      21 

"  ous  :  fo  that  lie  appeared,  and  they  knew 
*^.  him  to  be,  the  mly  begotten  of  th  Father^ 
<'  or  the  MeiTiah  *." 

The  glory  which  they  beheld^  did  confift 
in  thofe  demonftrations  of  the  divine  pre^ 
ience  with  him,  which  gave  the  luftre  of  his 
Spirit^  of  his  dodrinal  teachings,  and  of  all 
his  exemplary  behaviour.  Wifdom,  bene- 
volence, and  power  flione  throughout  his 
public  miniflrations  !  and  what  wonder  they 
fliould,  when  he  was  to  open  the  dodrine 
of  immortal  life  to  mankind,  and  alTure  them 
of  his  having  actually  made  void  the  domi^ 
nion  of  death  ! — That  he,  in  fad:,  was  the 
well-beloved  of  the  Father,  approved  of  the 
Governor  of  the  univerfe,  they  were  afcer- 
tained,  by  a  voice  from  heaven,  once  and 
again  which  they  had  heard,  exprefsly  de- 
claring him  to  be  fo.  And  this  hiftorian  was 
one  of  the  three  witnefTes  of  his  transfgura^ 
tion!  Befides  this,  his  refurredion  and  af- 
cenfion  v^ere  made  known,  not  only  to  them, 
but  to  great  numbers  of  the  difciples : — and 
we  can  add  to  thefe  very  convincing  evi- 
dences, the   ability  which  they  themfelves 

*  Page  29* 

had 


22      C-ONSIDERATIONS  ON  THE  LoGOS. 

had  of  working  miracles  in  the  namq.  of  the 
exalted  Jefus ;  which  were  enough  to  give 
Spirit  to  this  declaration, — and  we  saw-his 
GLORY  ! — St.  Peter  makes  ufe  of  a  lik?  fort 
of  speech,  when  he  fays,  "  we  have  not 
**  followed  cunningly  devifed  fables,,  v^'hilft 
^*  we  made  knovA^n  to  you,  the  coming  of 
'*  our  Lord  Jefus  Chrifl:,  but  were  eye-wit-^! 
"  neffes  of  his  majefly,  when  there  came 
"  fuch  a  voice  from  the  excellent  glory,  this 
**  is-  7ny  beloved  Sofiy  in  whom  I..<ni\,',^iidl 
^^  pkafed'' — —  .rrxinilo 

^•..The  glory  which  the  residence,  of.. the 
ho^os  had  conferred  oinitihe  man  Chrift.  Je-r 
fus,  might  be  farther  learnt  from  the  ejiprefs 
declaration  of  this  great  prophet  himfelf  j 
for  he  faid  of  his  friend  Lazarus,  ''this  fick-. 
"  nefs  is  not  unto  death,  i.  e.  not  unto  an 
*'  irrecoverable  death,  but  for  the  glory  of 
"  God  y  that  the  Son  of  God  might  be 
"  glorified  thereby."  yobnx\./\..  And  when. 
he  takes  a  view  of  the  tendency  which  his 
own  fufferings  had,  to  convince  the  world 
of  fi/iy  of  righteoufnefsy  and  of  judgemint  j 
he  fays,—"  now  is  the  Son  of  man  glori-?. 
*'  fied,  and  God  is  glorified  in  him.  If  God 
A  '*  be 


Considerations  on  the  Logos.     23 

**  be  glorified  in  him,  God  fliall  glorify  him 
"  in  himfelf,  and  iliall  ftraightway  glorify 
"  him."  ^obn  xiii.  31,  32.  To  this  purpole, 
in  his  prayer,  he  greatly  refrelheth  his  own 
Spirit,  with  the  moral  imprefTions  that  would 
be  made  on  mankind,  by  his  teachings.  Chap, 
xvii.  10.  "  All  mine  are  thine,  and  thine 
"  are  mine,  and  I  am  glorified  in  them." 
And  again,  this  hifcorian  fo  underftood  the 
miraculous  power,  which  wrought  by  his 
mafler,  as  manifefting  his  glory.  See  chap, 
ii.'ii.  This  begimmig  of  miracles  did  fefus — 
and  manifcjled  forth  his  glory. — Very  appo- 
lite  then  is  the  exordium  of  St.  fohiis  firft  e- 
piftle,  "  that  which  was  from  the  begin- 
**  ning,  which  we  have  heard,  which  we 
*'  have  feen  with  our  eyes,  which  we  have 
"  critically  looked  upon,  and  our  hands  have 
"  handled  the  Word  of  life."— - 

From  the  above  view  taken  of  the  in- 
troduction to  St.  fohris  Gofpel,  and  the 
delcription  which  he  has  given  of  the  Logos 
or  Word,  fliechinized  in  the  man  Chrift  Je- 
fus  j  feveral  ufeful  obfer'vatio?2s  may  be  made, 
or  fundry  important  conclufions  drawn  from 
the  premifes.    Such  as  follow  ; 

Obf.  L 


j24    Considerations  on  the  Logos* 

Obf.  I.  St.  yohn's  account  of  the  Logosi 
or  Word,  will,  by  no  means,  allow  us  to 
conceive  of  it  as  any  part  of  the  perfon  of 
Jefus  Chrift;  but  only  as  refiding  in  or 
ivith  him ;  and  becoming  divinely  oracular 
throughout  his  public  miniftrationSd  Which, 
at  once,  removes  all  obfcurity,  and  fecures 
us  from  the  unpleafing  perplexity  of  vulgar 
interpretations.  We  can  now  conceive  of 
the  fame  divine  being,  who  gave  exiftence 
to  the  univerfal  fyftem,  as  manifefting  his 
will,  by  creation,  by  prefervation,  and  by 
that  government  which  he  exercifes  over  his 
rational  and  moral  offspring  ;  as,  alfo  in  the 
finifliing  of  his  plan,  becoming  fhechinized 
or  as  dwelling  in  the  man  Chrifl  Jefus ;  and 
thereby  making  himfelf  moft  gracioufly  fa- 
miliar with  mankind  1— 

There  is  therefore  no  manner  of  occafion 
for  the  childifh  and  abfurd  invention  of  a 
trinity  in  unity  ;  or,  an  hypoftatical  union  of  a 
duplicity  of  natures,  in  the  perfon  of  Chrifl. 
Nor  are  we  led  to  fpeak  of  him,  fometimes 
as  God,  at  other  times  as  man.  Opinions 
which  confound,  but  do  not  convey  any  one 

rational. 


Considerations  on  the  Logos.     25 

rational,  juft,  and  inftrudtlve  idea  of  the  Lo- 
gos, or  iro7'd  of  God. 

But  when  we  affix  this  fenfe  to  the  term, 
as  expreffive,  or  as  manifeftative  of  the  will 
of  God,  whether  under  the  idea  of  creator, 
preferver,  or  governor,  and  redeemer,  we  are 
then  able  to  conceive  of  it,  as  hi  the  begin- 
ningy  as  with  God,  and  e'ven  as  God;  becaule 
the^will  of  the  Deity  imports,  fupreme  au-- 
thority ;  and  is  every  where  to  be  fo  reve- 
renced >  even  as  God. 

In  giving,  what  I  underftand  to  be,  the 
meaning  of  St.  John  in  his  introduction,  the 
phrafe,  in  our  tranflation  runs,  and  the  Word 
was  God,  xcti  Qeoi  Ljj  0  Xcy^'  a  writer  above- 
mentioned  reads,  **  and  God  was  the  Word, 
"  obferving,  that  Arians  and  Socinians  read, 
"  the  Word  was  a  God.^"  ■  ■  ■■  But  inafmuch 
as  the  fame  writer,  had  before  faid,  "  By  the 
Word  (John  i.  i.)  1  apprehend  the  Evan- 
"  gelift  means,  the  Go/pel  -f-  ;"  it  does  not  fo 
much  illuftrate  this  text,  as  it  darkens  the 
phrafe  j  fince  it  is  not  fo  intelligible  how  God 
is  the  GofpeL  The  reading  feems  much  more 
eafy  and  natural  as  it  ds-ndSj  the  Word  was  God, 

*  Illuftrations,  p,  59.  f  Ibid,  p.  58. 

E  or 


26     Considerations  on  the  Logc^v 

or  God  himfelf  J  confidered  and  underftood  to= 
be,  the  manifeftative  will  of  God,  Which  in-» 
terpretation,  perfe(5lly  accords  with  all  an- 
cient ufages  of  the  term,  Logos,  or  Word-r 
and  enables  us  to  harmonize  the  laft  with  all 
ibrmer  manifeftations  of  God  j  and  at  the 
fame  time  renders  us  capable  of  difcerning 
th€  divinity  of  the  Gofpel  di^enfation  clearly 
demonftrated. 

It  is  certainly  of  the  lafl  importance,-  that 
we  preferve  an  idea  of  the  Logos  or  Word, 
as  diftindt  from  the  perfon  of  Jefus  Chrift  j, 
otherwife,  we  cannot  underfland  him  when 
he  is  abfolutely  difclaiming  all  divine  per- 
fections ;  and  when  he  is  afcribing-  all  that 
wiidom  and  power,  v^hich  did  atceft  his 
miflion,  to  communications  of  divine  ability 
from:  the  Father.  Here,  it  will  be  proper 
for  us  to  notice  fomc  very  extraordinary  re- 
prefentations  of  our  Lord's  formation  and 
birth,  given  us  in  a.  Senfion  ^nd  ?wtes  lately 
published,  by  a  very  karned  and  diftinguiilied 
fon  of  the  church  of  England ;  who,  in' 
treating  on  Chrift's  l?ehig  born  of  a^'drgin^  ha* 
thus  unwarily  exprefled  himfelf,  —  *'  This 
'^  God  vifible  amongft  men,  inti'oduced  into- 

"  the 


CoNsjDERATJOKS  DN -T^E  Logos.     27 

'^  the  world  thus,  fhall  yet  be  truly  man, 
**  lie  (liall  be  born  as  an  infant,  and  as  an 
"  infant  fhall  he  be  brought  up." 

Again,  *'  4^is  divinity  (i.  e.  that  of  the 
Meffiah)  is  marked  by  his  being  God  ;  his 
■*'  refidence  upon  earth,  by  his  being  God 
"  with  iis;  and  his  humanity,  by  his  being 
^'  born  of  ..a  woman,  and  fed  with  •  the 
^^cufii^l  ^food   of  infants   during  his-iiifant 


itate 


More  extraordinary  yet,  if  poffible,--^"'It 
■"..feems  to  have  been  a  juft  mark  of'dig- 
f*,  .nity,  that  the  author  of  nature  jfhould 
***  be  drfting^iflied  by  not  being  born  after 
**  the  ordinary  courfe  of  nature :  ^nd-  hav- 
"  ing  evea*  been  as  no  other  being  was,  -the 
*'  Son  of  Gody  he  became  what  no  other 
*'  -ever  was,  the  Son  of  n  'virgm  -j-."  '^ 

With  great  fubmiffion,  I  would  afk,  whe- 
the  Dr.  Kennicot  has  not  here,  in  the 
moft  exprefiive  language,  very  unwarily 
countenanced    the  popifh  dodrine,    of  the 

*  Dr.   Kennicott's  Sermon  at  Oxford,  May 
J9»  U^S»  P-  26,  27. 
t  Ibid.  Notei^  p.  62. 

E  2  Virgin 


28    Considerations  ON  THE  Logos. 

Virgin  Mary's  being  the  mother  of  God? 
for  if  the  author  of  nature  could  be  born  of 
a  woman,  afTu redly,  there  will  be  fome  pre- 
tence for  the  homage  paid  her,  by  the  papal 
world.  And,  me  thinks,  the  difpute  about 
the  immaculate  conception,  as  maintained  by 
tlie  FrancifcanSy  would  be  in  their  favour, 
and  not  on  the  fide  of  the  Tiominicans. 

The  Dr.  will  allow  me,  however,  to  put 
thefe  queftions,  — "  If  the  author  of  nature 
*'  was  bora  of  a  virgin,  what  poffible  oc- 
^'  cafion  could  there  be,  for  his  having  the 
*'  Spirit  poured  out  upon  him  at  his  bap- 
.**  tifm?  and  what  that  fpirit  was,  which 
U  was  then  poured  out  upon  him  T  for  if 
the  God  of  nature,  did  becorae  die  Son  of 
a  virgin,  then  that  Sqn  of  a  virgin,  could 
not  be  any  other  than  the  God  of  nature. 

*'  Thus  ingenious  men  are  found  fup- 
porting  that  treniendous  fyfterr^  of  metaphyr 
fical fubtlety  which  remains  a  monument  of 
the  extent  and  weaknefs  of  the  human  ur^r 
derftanding,  and  by  eftablifliing  too  much, 
dp  hurt  the  foundation  of  the  mod  interefl- 
ing  principles  of  religion.*' 

But, 


Considerations  on  the  Logos.      29 

But,  thanks  be  to  God,  fo  far  from  the 
leaft  countenance  being  given  in  facred  fcrip- 
ture  to  Tuch  reprefentation  of  the  MefTiah, 
as  that  of  the  God  of  nature's  being  born 
of  a'  Virgin,  he   is  always   fpoken   of,  in 
prophecy,  as  a  man ;  and  moft  commonly 
ipeaks  of  himfelf  i&the  Son  of  man  j  unlefs 
he  has  occafion  to  mention  the  divine  mif- 
fion  which  he  had  to  reveal  the  Father  to 
mankind ;  and  then,  he  fometimes  calls  him- 
felf the  Son  of  God.    Yet,  whenever  he  ufes 
that  exalted  flile,  it  is  not  to  be  imagined, 
he  would  be  underftood  to  mean,  he  ivas 
that  God  ivhofe  Son  he  was.  —  If  therefore  we 
would  preferve  any  rational  or  intelligible 
ideas  of  Jefus  Chrift,  we  muft  contemplate 
the  Logos,  or  Word,  which  dwelt  with  him, 
as  abfolutely  diftindt  from  his  perlbn. — In  a 
wordy  the  fupreme  univerfal  power,  autho- 
rity and   dignity,  by  which  the  Logos  did 
exprefs  itfelf,  whihl  dwelling  with  the  man 
Chrift  Jefus,  was,  what  determined  the  cha- 
rader  of  the  true  MeJJiah,     Or,  in  the  words 
of  a  learned  divine,  "  he  was  thus  the  true 
*'  Shechinah  j  the  true  glory  of  God  as  really 
Y  dwelt  in  him,  as  \vhen  the  fVord  of  the 

Shechinah 


i< 


30      Co;^  SI  DERATIONS  ON  THE  LoGOS» 

'5  S^echimh  gave  forth  the  command  for  tho 
creation  of  the  world,   or  when  it  pub^ 
^f  jifhed  the  la\y  at  mount  Sinai,  or  when  it 
*'  enter  d  the  tabernacle:  and  temple,  and  the 
^V  whole  worfhip  of  the  Hebrew  church, 
^*  and  all  proper  divine  honours  were  given 
-'V  unto  it,*"    Yet,  afluredly,  no  reafqn^hle 
man  can.faj,  that  either  the  tf«^^/,  thei^- 
hernofky  ;th9  \temple,    of  tho.-: prophet ^  rVf.%% 
Other," rDJCJWMiie  than  the  SJoechimb^.-ox^'v^i'' 
ilrument  of  conveyance,  V by  which  a  mani- 
feftationwas  made  of  the  Word,  or  will  pf 
God.  —  For  will  any  lay,   that  becaufe  the 
Word  of  the  Shechinah  faid  to  Moles,  /  wiJI 
.  make  thee  a  God  to  Pharaoh  j  or,  thujimk  he 
to  him  inft.iad  of  God.  (Exod.  iv.  16.  vii.  i.} 
that  therefore  ^^i  became  the  fame  with 
the  divine  Wordi  which  wrought  fuch  won- 
ders by  him  ?    This  would  be  very  unao 
•countable.    The  Jewilh  multitudes  were  ex- 
tremely ignorant   and   deprived ;   but  yet, 
when  they  faw  the  miracks  which  our  Lord 
wrought  among  them,  .  they  garje  glory  to 
God-     They  did  not   afcribe   the  power  to 
J^fus  of  Nazareth,  but  to  the  God  of  nature^ 

.jAh    ^5  *  J^VVJf^Art's  Three;itra(pts,  p.  5^47. 

.^,.-,'.  .4v  who 


COxV  $  I DER  AT  rOiC  S  ON  TH^  Lb&65.      3'  £ 

who  thus  bore  leftimony  t6  his  being  th^ 
Meffidb,  They  diflingulflied  between  the 
pcrfon  of  Jefus  Chrift,  and  th^t  Word  of 
God  which  dwelt  with  hini  j  between  the 
Being  who  fent,  and  his  meffenger. 

Obf.  II.  The  ienfe  in  which  we  have 
underftood  the  Logos,  or  Word  of  God, 
will  quite  annihilate  the  idea  of  his  pre-ex- 
iftence,  whom  we  call  Christ. 

It  fhould  feem,  that  it  has  been  owing  to 
menV  not  keeping  their  conceptions  of  the 
WorJy  and  of  the  perfbn  of  Chrift  diftind:, 
that  they  have  fo  unnaturally  fancied  a  pre- 
exiftence  of  the  man  Chrift  Jefus.  At  the 
fame  time,  no  one  may  call  in  queftion  a 
pre-exiflence  of  the  divine  Pp^ordy  which 
dwelt  with  him.  And  it  has  been  fliewn,- 
with  great  evidence  and  mafterly  addrefs, ' 
that  the  Logos  did  not  fupply  the  place  of 
any  human  foul  in  the  perfon  of  Jefus  Chrift; 
which  may  be  feen,  in  the  Letter  writ  in  the 
year  ijT^o. — Allow  me  to  add,  that,  the 
i<vo  or  •  three  texts  in  the  New  Teftament, 
fuppofed  to  countenance  this,  will  be  found 
to  have  no  fuch  meaning,  if  our  interpre-'^ 


tition* 


22    Considerations  on  the  Logos; 

tation  of  the  Logos,  be  juft  and  defenfiblci 
— Befides  St.  Johns  introdudion,  the  texts 
which  have  moll:  puzzled  the  minds  of  feme 
chriftians  are,  Jobi  v'l.  62. — viii.  58. — xvil. 
^.    As  to  the  Jirft  pafTage,   methinks,   the 
folution  may  be  thus  given, —  "  What  ?  and 
*'  if  ye  (hall  fee  the  Son  of  man,   after  he 
*'  has  given  his  flefli  to  the  tortures  and 
"  death  of  a  crofs,   re-alTume   his   former 
**  exalted  chara(fler  of  the  well-beh'-oed  of  the 
"  Father  ?    You  will  then  underfland  the 
*'  fpiritual  and  life-giving  defign  of  my  mif- 
"  fion."« — And  is  not  this  agreeable  to  the 
drift  of  his  reafoning  ?  let  any  one  read  the 
context. — The  next  difficult  paflage,  is,  be- 
fore Abraham  was,  I  am.     The  Jews  afked 
him,  ivhether  he  was  greater  tha?i  their  fa- 
ther Abraham  f  If  this  be  an  anfwer  to  that 
queftion,  it  is  given  in  the  affirmative ;  and 
is  the  fame  as  if  he  had  faid,  yes,  I  am 
greater.  —  Should  it  yet  be  faid,  the  words 
would  intimate,  a  prior  exigence  to  that  of 
Abraham  f  —  The   anfwer   may   be,    fuch 
an  interpretation  is  not  at  all  neceflary,  for 
he  could  not  perfonally  be  before  him,  in 
point   of  time,    any  otherwife  than  as  he 

is 


Considerations  on  the  Logos.     33 

is  fpoken  of  in  prophecy,  as  the  feed  of  the 
'woma?!. — And  concerning  whom  Abraham 
had  the  pleafure  of  expe6ling  fuch  a  defcen- 
dant,  in  who?n  all  nations  fiould  be  hkjj'ed.  — • 
Elfe  we  may  underftand  our  Lord,  as  fpeak- 
ing  in  the  perfon  of  the  Logos^  or  of  the 
divine  Word,  which  dwelt  with  him. — This 
had  been  fometimes  the  manner  of  a7igch 
and  of  prophets,  by  whom  the  Word  cf  the 
Shechinah  fpake.  And  hovv  otherwife  mud 
we  underfland  him,  when  he  fays,  I a?n  that 
Iivi?7g  bread  'which  cometh -down  from  hea'ven. — 
Now,  by  the  mod  reafonable  and  fair  con- 
ftrudlion,  our  Lord  could  intend  no  other 
by  that  U'uing  bread  than  the  doctrine  he 
delivered,  which  was  fo  expreilive  of  the 
will  of  the  Father.  Which  very  docftrine, 
was  that  living  bread,  of  which  men  might 
eat,  and  live  for  ever.  He  mu ft,  .confe- 
qiiently,  be  underftood  as  perfonating  the 
Logos  or  Word  of  God,  when  he  lays,  / 
am  the  living  bread,  ivhich  came  down  from 
heaven.  And  in  no  other  (tniiQ  can  he  be 
underftood,  when  he  fays,  I  am  the  light  of 
the 'world.  John  viii.  12. 

F  This 


34     Considerations  on  the  Logos. 

This  perfonating  of  the  Logos,  or  of  the 
manifeftatlve  will  of  the  Father,  is  very  fami- 
liar to  him ;  neverthelefs  St.  yohn  obferves, 
ver.  27.  that  the  captious  Jews,  did  not  un~ 
derfiand  that  he  fpake  to  them  of  the  Father ^ 
when  he  was  perfonally  affirming  thefe  things 
of  his  dodrine. 

May  we  not  alfo  underftand  our  Lord,  as 
perfonating  the  Logos,  when  he  fays,  I  ajn 
the  refiirreciion  and  the  life  ! — and  he  that  be- 
lieveth  in  me  fiall  not  perijh,  but  fiall  have 
eternal  life  ? — It  cannot  reafonabiy  be  im- 
derftood  as  intending  any  thing  lefs  than 
the  energy  of  the  divine  Word,  operating 
under  V.^c  Gofpel  difpenfation,  and  giving 
the  \a.Cz  efficacy  to  the  adminiflration  of  this 
one  Lord.  It  will  be  extremely  difficult  to 
conceive  of  Jefas  Chrift  being  any  otherwife 
the  refurreclion  and  the  life,  but  as  the  Fa- 
ther who  has  life  in  himielf ;  clTentially  and 
underived  -,  fo  has  he  given  to  the  Son  to 
have  life  in  hlmfelf.  And  as  the  Father 
raifcth  up  the  dead,  and  quickneth  them  : 
even  fo  the  Son  quickneth  whom  he  will, 
comp.  John  v.  21.  and  26.  And  his  autho- 
rity to  execute  judgment,  is  alfo  given  him  ; 

becai;fe 


Considerations  on  the  Logos.     35 

becaufe  he  is  the  So?2  of  man :  he  therefore 
could  have  no  fuch  authority,  if  the  Father 
had  not  given  it  to  him,  ver.  27. 
.  It' is  not  to  be  w^ondered  at,  he  iliould  fo 
frequently  fpeak  in  the  perfon  of  the  Father, 
when  he  could  exprefsly  declare,  I  am  come 
in  my  Father  s  name. — T^he  works  which  I  do 
are  in  my  Father's  name. 

But,  that  no  one  fliould  mlilake  him,  as 
if  he  made  any  claims  to  real  divinity,  he 
fays,  ye  JJjall  know  that  I  am  he^  and  that  I 

'{  do  nothing  of  myfef: /  have  not  fpoken  of 

myfefj  but  the  Father  who  fent  ine^  hath  given 
me  a  commandment ^  what  I  fiould  fay^  and 
what  I  fiould  fpeak.  Whofoever  Jljall  receive 
fncj  •  receiveth  not  jne,  but  him  that  fent  me. — 
Thefe  palTages  are  fufficient  to  fhew,  that 
when  the  bleffed  Jefus  fays  j  before  Abraham 
was  I  am-,  he  may  be  well  underftood,  as 
perfonating  the  divine  Word  which  fpake  by 
him.  And  this  fenfe  is  not  at  all  impro- 
bable, when  we  advert  to  the  language  he 
ufes  in  the  antcedent  context,  fee  ver.  47. 
}ie  that  is  of  Gody  heareth  God's  words :  ye 
therefore  hear  not^  becaufe  ye  are  not  of  God.—^ 

F  2  As 


36     Considerations  on  the  Logos. 

As  to  the  third  difficult  text,  where  he 
prays,  that  the  Father  would  glorify  him, 
ivith  the  glory  which  he  had  with  him  before 
the  world  was — It  has  been  underftood,  by 
thofe  who  have  denied  the  pre-exiflence  of 
Jefus  Chrifl:,  to  Intend,  the  glory  which  God 
had  originally  defigned  him,  in  reward  of 
his  obedience  unto  death,  even  the  death  of 
the  crofs.  Which  is  a  very  rational  and  juft 
interpretation,  and  agrees  well  with  thofe 
other  fcriptures,  where  chriftians  are  faid  to 
be  chofen  in  Chriji  before  the  foundation  of  the 
world.  And  where  Jefus  Chrift  is  faid  to 
be  a  la:nb  flain  befof'e  the  foundation  of  the 
world. 

The  judicious  author  oithe  Letter  writ  in 
the  year  1730,  has  faid  more  to  the  purpofe 
on  this  dibjed,  than  any  other  I  have  ever 
yet  leen  ;  and  from  vvliom  I  have  borrowed 
much  information  :  he  has  written  with  a 
freedom,  which  does  not,  which  unhappily 
cannot  attend  the  pen  of  a  church-man. — 

Obf  III.  If  there  Is  no  divine  perfon,  but 
that  of  the  Father,  as  fliould  appear  to 
be  the  teaching  of  Chrift  and  of  all  his  a- 
poliles  J  then  the  opinion  of  more  than  one 

perfon 


Considerations  on  the  Logos.      37 

perfon  in  the  godhead,  muft  be  unfcriptural. 
To  affirm  therefore,  as  fome  have  done, 
*'  that  there  are  three  perfons  of  one  fub- 
"  fiance,  power  and  eternity  in  the  unity  of 
"  the  Godhead  \  muft  throw  darknefs  and 
confufion  upon  the  unity.  For,  in  truth, 
the  unity  might  every  whit  as  well  be  proved 
from  the  pagan  polytheifm,  as  from  the  A- 
thanafian  Symbol.  None  need  fcruple  to 
fay,  that  thefe  proportions  are  mathemati- 
cally falfe, — viz.  "  three  are  not  more  than 
one ;  and  one  is  not  lefs  than  three"  No 
Trinitarian  is,  or  ever  will  be,  able  to  con- 
fute the  advocate  for  Transubstantia- 

TION. • 

Obf.  IV.  We  have  infinite  reafon  of  ad- 
miration, gratitude,  and  praife,  becaufe  the 
Woi'd  cf  Gody  by  which  the  worlds  were 
made,  and  have  been  preferved  and  go- 
verned, did  condefcend  fo  to  refide  with  the 
man  Chrifl  JeiiTS,  as  to  manifeft  all  that 
truth  and  grace^  which  can  either  guide  and 
diredl,  fuccour  and  fiipport,  comfort  and 
refrefh  mankind,  under  all  the  darkneffes, 
difficulties,  dangers,  burdens  and  grievances 

of 


.38     Considerations  on  the  Logos, 

of  this  prefent  life  j  and  alfo  qualify  them 
for  the  blifsful  fruitions  of  a  future  ftate  and 
world.  It  is  very  pleafing,  nay,  it  is  highly 
■  tranfporting  to  contemplate  the  divine  ad- 
vantages of  Gofpel  infl:ru6lion. 

It  fliould,  indeed,  be  reafonable  to  con- 
clude, that  no  age  of  the  world  has  been 
without  fome  teachings  of  the  divine  Word, 
The  will  of  God,  has  been  fome  way  or 
other  made  manifeft  to  mankind.  Yet  no 
antecedent  teachings,  of  which  we  are  in- 
formed, have  been  able  to  bear  a  compari- 
ibn  with  thofe  under  the  Gofpel.  Were  not 
this  a  truth,  v/e  could  not  account  for  St. 
John's  pouring  fo  much  contempt  on  the 
Mofaic  difpenfation,  as  he  does,  juft  after  he 
has  mentioned  the  in-dwelling  of  the  Word 
with  the  man  Chrijl  Jefiis  j  fee  ver.  1 7.  the  law 
was  given  by  Mofes  j  but  grace  and  truth  came 
by  Jefus  Cb?HJ}.  q.  d.  comparatively,  till  then, 
grace  and  truth  had  not  had  any  clear  and 
full  exhibition.  Agaiii^  if  we  can  fuppole 
that  the  apoftles  did  underfland  the  import- 
ance of  the  dodrine  which  they  delivered, 
we  muft  be  perfuaded,  they  had  fufficient 

reafon 
2 


Considerations  on  the  Logos.     3;^ 

reafon  for  being  in  raptures,  whenever  they 
mention  the  benevolence  it  fhews  to  man- 
kind. 

Obf.  V.  An  apparent  advantage  it  mufl 
be  of  to  any  one,  in  reading  the  Gofpels,  to 
preferve  in  his  own  mind,  pure  and  unadul- 
terated, an  idea  of  the  divine  unity,  ivsr. 
"  that  there  is  but  one  Hving  and  true  God, 
"  of  necellary,  everlafting,  and  unchangeable 
**  exiftence,  without  body,  parts,  or  paffions ; 
**  of  wifdom,  power,  and  goodnefs  infinite  : 
"  the  maker,  preferver,  and  governor  of  all 
**  things  vifible  and  invifible."  This  would 
fecure  the  human  mind  from  all  thofe  wild, 
and  unreafonable  opinions,  which  divide, 
difturb,  and  diftradl  the  whole  chriflian  pro- 
feffing  world,  e.  g.  What  heated  controver- 
fies  have  been  agitated  about  the  mataphyiir 
cal  nature  of  Chrift  ?  or  rather,  about  his 
having  two  natures  -,  the  one  divine,  the  other 
human  !  and  whether  he  had  one  will,  or 
two  wills  ?  Such  futile,  fuch  unedifying  mat- 
ters of  debate,  have  filled  the  world  with  noife 
and  clamor,  and  the  church  with  fable  dark- 
nefs  and  much  confufion.  Whereas  the  ma- 
pifeft  defign  of  Gofpel  teachings,  is,  to  give 

mankind 


40    Considerations  on  the  Logos. 

mankind  a  moft  perfect  revelation  of  the 
truth  and  grace  of  God. 

If  the  moral  or  the  pradical  end  had  been 
kept  in  view,  and  religioufly  obferved,  by  the 
profeffing  world,  the  honours  due  to  the  di- 
vine miffion  of  Jefus,  would  have  been  paid 
by  a  more  univerfal  obedience  to  his  teach- 
ings. But  as  it  is,  a  thoufand  ftrange  opi- 
nions are  propagated  ;  nor  only  fo,  but  the 
homage  of  the  chriftian  is  become  extreme- 
ly ceremonious,  idle,  and  fuperftidous. 

Among  other  extravagancies,  Popery 
could  never  have  found  where  to  have  fet 
the  fole  of  her  foot,  if  the  divine  unity  had 
been  preferved  pure  and  uncorrupt.  That 
monftrous  deteftable  fuperflition,  was  erecft- 
ed  upon  mens  depraving  this  firil-principle 
of  all  religious  worfhip !  for,  when  once 
chriftians  had  learnt  to  imagine,  the  Godhead 
divided  into  three  perfons  i  and  one  of  thofe 
perfons  into  two  natures  j  when  they  could 
once  conceive  of  the  divine  Logos,  as  the 
Soul  of  Jefus  Chrift,  they  were  then  pre- 
pared to  embrace  any  fanciful  opinion,  that 
could  be  grafted  upon  thefe  mofl  abfurd 
principles. 


Considerations  on  the  Logos.     41 

Not  any  thing  gave  the  artful  Mahomet 
fo  much  advantage,  as  chriilians  corrupting 
the  dodrine  of  the  unity.  This  was  what 
rendered  him  Co  very  capable  of  fpreading 
his  impofture,  when  he  could  call  himfelf 
a  prophet  of  the  one  God^  ivho  had  no  ■part- 
ners ■*  /  The  very  unguarded  way,  which 
chriilians  had  ufed,  of  fpeaking  about  an  e- 
ternal  generation  of  the  Son^  was  what  gave 
him  the  opportunity  of  ridiculing  the  opinion 
with  fo  much  Spirit  -f-. — The  doSlrine  of  the 
trinity  he  thus  authoritatively  condemns  ; 
"  O  ye,  who  have  received  the  Scriptures ! 
"  exceed  not  the  juft  bounds  in  your  reli- 
"  gion,  neither  fay  of  God  any  other  than 
**  the  truth.  Verily  Jefjs  Chrift,  the  Sen  of 
"  of  Mary,  is  the  apoftle  of  God,  and  his 
"  Word,  which  he  conveyed  into  Mary, 
"  and  a  Spirit  proceeding  from  him.  Be- 
"  lieve  therefore  in  God,  and  in  his  apoftlesj 
*'  and  fay  not,  'There  are  three  Gcds;  forbear 
"  this,  it  will  be  better  for  you  J."     And 

*  See  Ockky's  hiflory  of  the  Saracens,  vol.  II.  p. 
38,  279.    . 

f  See  Sale's  Koran,  vol.  I.  p.  23.    vol.  IL  p.  lO, 
J845  315-  t  Vol.  I.  p.  12^. 

G  ^^g^ii^} 


42     Considerations  on  the  Logos. 

again, — *'  Chriil:,  the  Son  of  Mary,  is  nq 
*'  more  than  an  apoflle  j  other  apoflks  have 
"  preceded  him,  and  his  mother  was  a  wo- 
''  man  of  veracity :  they  both  ate  food."-— The 
7Wte  upon  it  is  this,—"  never  pretending  to 
*^  partake  of  the  divine  nature,  or  to  be  the- 
*'  mother  of  God*.'' 

Kow  unfortunate  is  it  that  the  very  learn- 
ed Dr.  Ken  N I  COT,  fhould  readvance  a  no- 
tion, condemned,  with  £o  much  evidence,  in 
the  Koran  :  and  that  has  been  the  blackefl 
difgrace  ever  brought  on  the  chriftian  name, 
in  regard  to  abdird  and  unreafonable  opinion. 

We  are  tlius  enabled  to  collect  the  ge- 
nuine original  of  that  deformity  vi^hich  now 
fits  on  the  face  of  the  chriftian  profeffion. 
Would  v^'e  then  contribute  all  we  can,  to 
reftore  the  loft  fimpllcity  and  purity  of  the 
Gofpel-profefTion  ?  it  muft  be  by  contem- 
plating the  man  Chrift  Jefus  as  the  temple  of 
the  divine  Word,  and  by  fo  reverencing  his 
inftrudlions,  as  to  be  daily  trained,  by  them, 
unto  virtue  and  glory. 

Obf.  VI.  Some  reafonable  conjedlures  may 
Ji^nce  be  formed^,  about  the  more  immediate 

'*  Vol.  I.  p.  146, 


Considerations  on  the  Logos.    43 

defign  of  St.  John,  in  writing  his  fupple- 
mental  Golpel.  The  very  learned  and  ju- 
dicious Dr.  Lardner,  thinks,  that  the  time 
of  its  being  written,  and  pubHdied,  might  be 
in  the  year  68.  He  fees  no  reafon  to  think 
it  was  defignedly  compofed  in  oppofition  to 
any  chriftian  hereiies ;  the'  many  learned 
men  have  thought  the  introduBion  was  fo  in- 
tended.—  But  with  this  ecclefiaftical  hifto- 
rian, — "  it  appears  agreeable  to  the  main 
"  defign  of  his  Golpel ;  for  he  therein  (liews, 
**  that  Jefus  came,  and  a6led  by  the  autho- 
"  rity  of  God,  the  creator  of  the  world,  the 
"  God,  and  fupreme  Lawgiver  of  the  Jewifh 
**  people.  The  eternal  word,  reafon,  wif- 
**  dom,  power  of  God,  which  is  God  him- 
"  felf,  by  which  the  world  had  been  made, 
**  by  which  he  dwelled  among  the  Jews  in 
"  the  tabernacle  and  in  the  temple  ;  this 
'''^  fame  Word  dv/elled,  and  refided  in  Jefus, 
*'  in  the  fulleft  manner  *." 

He  obferves,  "  that  there  is  little  or  no- 
**  thing  in  his  Gofpel,  which  is  not  new  and 
"  additional,  except  the  account  of  our  Sa- 
"  viour's  profecution,  death,  and  refurredion, 

*  Supplement  to  credibility,  vol.  I.  p.  437. 

G  2  "  where 


44     Considerations  on  the  Logos. 

*'  where  all  the  four  Evangelifts  coincide  in 
"  many  particulars  :  tho'  even  here  alfo  St. 
"  Johjihzs  divers  things  peculiar  to  himfelf  *." 
Undoubtedly,  St.  John's  Gofpel  is  fupple-- 
mental.  And  therefore  the  obvious  defign  of 
it  certainly  was,  to  record  fome  things  omitted 
bv  the  other  EvanQ;elifts :  but  inafmuch  as  his 
record,  is,  chiefly  of  thofe  difcourfes,  which 
do  relate  to  our  Lord's  divine  miffion  and 
charadter,  we  may  reafonably  conclude,  that 
this  hiflorian  had  a  more  immediate  defign 
to  provide  the  chriftian  church  with  the 
fuliell  evidence,  "  that  Jefus  Chrifl  both 
"  taught  and  performed  miracles,  only  by 
*'  the  wifdom  and  power  of  God,  or  by  the 
*'  Legos  refiding  with  him."  Nor  does  it 
ieem  improbable,  but  he  likewife  forefaw, 
by  a  prophetic  fpirit,  the  danger  chriflians 
would  more  generally  be  in,  of  perverting 
the  firft  principle  of  all  religion,  by  afcribing 
a  real  and  proper  divinity  to  the  perfon  of 
Jefus  Chriil;. 

Of  all  the  Evangelifts,  St.JoHN  has  been  tlie 
mod  copious,  in  fliewing,  the  nature  of  our 
Lord's  divine  mifilcn,  and  his  true  and  proper 

*  Supplement  to  credibility,  vol.  I.  p.  449. 

hum  a- 


Considerations  on  the  Logos.      4^ 

humanity.  He  narrates  his  explicit  ?;cknow- 
ledgments  of  dependence :  his  afcribjag  all 
Ifis  divine  abilities  to  the  Father :  and  he 
lays  before  our  eyes,  the  refped:  which  Jefus 
had  to  the  joy  fet  before  him.  And  had 
chriftians  more  religioufly,  ufed  their  reafon 
and  underflanding,  in  coniulting  this  Evan- 
gelical record,  they  would  not  cafily  have 
been  perfuaded  of  Jefus  Chrift  poiTeffing  any 
divine  perfeiflions  of  his  own  j  who  fo  fre- 
quently-employed  himfelf  in  adts  of  fi/pph'^ 
cation  and  hofnag-e  to  his  Father.  There 
would  certainly  have  been  fomething,  in  his 
prayers^  that  we  could  not  fo  well  reconcile 
with  the  idea  of  his  being  a  divine  perfon  in 
the  Godhead,  of  equal  power  and  glory  with 

the  Father, 

It  is  indifputably  evident,  that  notwith- 
ftanding  the  prefence  of  the  Word  of  God 
conftantly  operating  by  him,  to  all  the  pur- 
pofes  of  attefting  and  rendring  efficacious  his 
heavenly  miffion  ;  yet,  he  was  confcious, 
that  this  divine  prefence  with  him,  did  not 
conflitute  any  part  of  his  own  perfonality  : 
and  therefore  it  was  that  he  lb  properly  and 

be- 
2 


-46     Considerations  on  the  Logos; 

becomingly  employed  himfelf  in  adls  of  ho- 
mage arid  devotion. — Many  remarkable  in- 
ftances  whereof,  are  recorded  by  this  Evan* 
gelifl.  And  one  prayer,  at  large,  he  has 
given  us,  wherein  there  is  exprefTed,  a  moil: 
pleafing  and  exalted  idea  both  of  his  piety 
and  philanthropy.  That  devotional  piece  is 
truly  matchlefs ! 

After  all,  fome  may  be  apt  to  retort  upon 
us,  by  faying,  **  that  (o  far  from  St.  Jo/m's 
"  Gofpel  having  had  the  happy  eifedl  of 
•*  preferving  the  chriftian  v^^orld  from  a  dif- 
"  pofition  to  deprave  the  docftrine  of  the 
"  unity,  that  it  has  more  generally  been  the 
**  authenticated  plea  for  fuch  depravity.  The 
"  heterogeneous  opinions,  do  pretend  to  fliel- 
"  ter  themfelves  under  the  reprefentations 
"  given,  by  this  hiftorian,  of  the  teachings^ 
*•  miffion,  and  character  of  Jefus." 

The  anfvver  to  this,  feems  very  obvious  ;— 
the  Deity,  in  demonftrating  his  eternal  pov/er 
and  Godhead,  by  the  vifible  creation,  and 
by  his  univerfal  providence,  did,  and  does 
certainly  defign  to  teach  men  to  form  jufl 
and  adorable  ideas  of  him.    But  this  did  not, 

nor 


I 


Considerations  on  the  Logos.     47 

nor  does  it  hinder  them  from  forming  the 
moft  idle  and  vain  imaginations ;  or  from 
deifying  .thofe  very  works  of  his  hands,  the 
Jitfti  the  tnooti,  and  the  hods  of  heaven! — . 
But  u'iil  any  hence  fay,  that  the  vifible  ma- 
nifeftation  of  God,  is  not  adapted  to  dcr 
inonurate  his  being  and  perfections ! 

The  cafe  is  analogous,  or  it  has  a  great 
Similitude  ;  for  St.  John's  infroduciion  to  his 
Gofpd,  and  the  whole  of  his  hiftory,  has  a 
jnanifeil  tendency  to  ihew,  ihat  the  very 
fame  being  who  created  the  w  jrld,  and  who 
has  preferved  and  informed  nankind  in  all 
ages,  by  certain  teachings  and  interpofitions 
of  his  Word^  in  this  or  in  the  other  manner 
fhechinized,  has,  under  the  Gofpel  difpen- 
fation,  made  his  truth  and  his  grace  ma- 
rifeft,  by  that  fame  Word  dwelling  with 
the  man  Chrift  Jefus.— But  inftead  of  at- 
tending to  this  defign  of  his  Gofpel,  men 
have  fancied  to  tht:mfelves,  fome  of  the  moft 
abfurd  and  myftical  meanings  in  this  plain, 
intelligible,  and  excellent  hiftorian.  Will 
it  then  follow,  that  St.  John  has  not  ex- 
prefTed  himfelf  with  clearnefs  and  precilion, 
^hen  he  has  written  upon  the  great  fubje<ft 

of 


48     Considerations  on  the  Logos. 

of  our  Lord's  divine  miffion  ?  I  fliould  be 
of  opinion  that  there  is  no  manner  of  ground 
for  fuch  a  difhonourable  concladon. 

The  venerable  ecclefiaftical  hiftorian,  men* 
tioned  under  this  obfervation,  will  allow  me 
to  think,  that  tho'  St.  'John  did  not  form 
his  introduStion^  with  a  delign  to  oppofe 
fome  herefies,  that  had  obtained  when  he 
wrote  his  Gofpel  -,  yet,  he  Was  guided,  by 
a  divine  infpiration,  to  introduce  his  hiftory 
in  the  manner  he  has  done,  in  order,  to 
prevent  as  much  as  poUible,  the  chriftiaii 
world  from  depraving  and  corrupting  the 
dodrine  of  the  unity. 

P.  S.  The  reader  will  perceive,  that  fome 
•late  publications  have  led  the  Author  to 
-offer  his  thoughts  on  a  fubjed;,  which  he 
apprehends  has  not  been  well  underftood^ 
except  by  a  very,  very  fev/  chriftian  writers. 
He  is  humbly  of  opinion,  that  Dr.  Daw- 
son has  had  courage  to  deliver  many  very  imr 
portant  truths,  in  his  illuflrations.  At  the 
fame  time,  he  is  afraid,  his  manner  of  prov- 
ing the  liturgy  of  his  churchy  to  be  upon  the 
principles  of  the  unity;  is  too  paradoxical, 
to  admit  of  an  eafy  reception.  .:^i\:ij 

As 


Considerations  on  the  Logos.     49 

As  to  Dr.  Kennicot's  propolitlons,  he 
is  perfuaded,  that  the  Dr.  has  very  widely 
and  mofl:  ftrangely  miftaken  his  fubje6l.— 
The  Author  of  thele  confiderations,  how- 
ever, has  no  defign  to  offend  either  the  one 
or  the  other  of  thefe  writers  j  but  prefumes 
upon  the  hberty  of  expreffing  freely  his  own 
thoughts  in  thofe  things  wherein  he  differs 
from  them ;  and  of  offering  to  the  public 
fuch  a  train  of  ideas  which  he  has  formed 
of  the  LoGoSj  or  JVord's  being  made  fieflo. 

The  Author  will  not  enter  into  any  al- 
tercation or  debate,  fhould  any  chufe  to  cri- 
ticife,  cenfure  or  condemn  this  his  defence 
of  the  unitv. — It  is  enough  for  him,  that  he 
is  able  to  infcribe  it  to  the  honour  and  glory 
of  the  one  God  the  Father,  and  alfo  to  that 
of  the  one  Lord. — And  were  it  the  lafi:  a(5l 
of  his  life,  he  fliould  have  a  iincere  pleafure 
in  this  attempt  to  reftore  the  almoft  loft  idea, 
of  the  DIVINE  unity. 


II  APPEN- 


APPENDIX. 

T.  John,  in  the  introdudion  to  his 
Gofpel,  having  Ipoken  of  the  Word 
as  creating,  makes  mention  of  it  as 
informing  the  world  concerning  the  will  of 
the  Governor  j  or,  as  enlivening  and  re- 
frefliing  the  Soul  of  man ;  which  he  thus 
exprefleSj  in  him  ivas  life^  a?id  the  life  ic'as 
the  light  of  men.  This  is  a  moft  afteding 
reprefentation  !  and  is  the  fame  as  if  he  had 
faid,  obedience  to  the  will  of  God  is  a  life- 
giving,  it  is  an  immortalizing  principle.  See 
Deut,  XXX.  15.  PfciL  xvi.  1 1.  Frov.  xii.  28. 
Ecclef.  vii.  12.  Ezekiel  xviii.  1 9. — xxi.  22. — 
xxxiii.  13,  15,  16.  compare  Matth.  xix.  17. 
fohn  v.  26. — vi.  57,  58.  — and  many  more 
authorities  might  be  produced  from  the  fa- 
cred  text.  This  is  not  affirmed  of  the  ani- 
mal, or  bodily  life  3  but  of  the  fpiritual  or 
moral.  Obedience  to  God  ever  gave  life 
and  light  to  the  mind  of  man  3  and  yet  ig- 
norance, idolatry  and  vice  did  fo  far  pre- 
vail, that  the  light,  is  faid  to  have  JJ:one  in 
ila?-knefs.     Nay,  there  was  a  Sect  famous 

among 


APPENDIX.  51 

among  the  Jews,  "  who  would  have  the 
"  actions  and  exped:ations  of  men  terminate 
**  with  this  preient  Hfe." — But  furely,  fuch 
could  not  be  faid  to  wait  for  the  adoption^  to 
ivit,  the  redemption  of  the  body.  Which  a 
late  learned  and  ftudious  Di'oine  obferves, 
"  does  not  fignify  the  refurredion  of  thefe 
*'  frail  bodies  ;  but  the  deliverance  which 
"  good  men  will  have,  at  the  coming  of 
"  Chrift,  from  a  ftate  of  mortality  and 
**  weaknefs  *." 

I  cannot  but  be  of  opinion,  that  all  good 
men  have  ever  had  fuch  deliverance,  upon 
their  finifhing  of  this  bodily  life  :  and  fb  I 
underftand  our  Lord,  when  he  fays,  that  as 
the  Father  hath  life  in  himfef  fo  has  he  given 
to  the  Son  to  have  life  in  hi?nfelf — The  be- 
ing who  annually  renews  the  face  of  na- 
ture, and  gives  frefh  life  to  the  world  of 
plants  and  vegetables,  v/as  never  unwilling 
to  exert  himfelf  in  behalf  of  reafonable  be- 
ings :  but  good  men  have  found  refources 
in  his  power  and  wifdom,  for  reftoring  life, 
and  furnifhing  them  with  fuch  bodies  as 
are  adapted  to  a  more  durable   and  perfect 

*  The  Reverend  Mr.  Jolm  Alexander  s  paraphrafe, 
^c.  p.  36. 

H  2  fiate 


52  APPENDIX. 

flate  of  exiftence.  This  feems  to  be  a  very 
reafonable  opinion.  And  is  it  not  thus  that 
the  blefTed  Jefus  fays,  my  Father  ivarketh  hi- 
therto^ and  1  ivork  f 

The  ingenious  Author  above-mentioned, 
(tho'  2i  foul Jleepe?-)  confiders  the  refurredtion- 
body,  "  as  not  formed  by  any  procefs  of  na- 
"  ture,  but  by  an  immediate  ad:  of  divine 
*'  power,  rifes  fpiritual  and  immortal  ^  the 
^'  body  that  is  fown,  no  more  than  the  feed 
"  that  is  fown,  being  the  body  that  fhall  be 
"  produced,  but  altogether  different  in  its 
''  frame  and  properties  ■*."  —  And  agaln^  he 
"  obferves,  — "  the  apoftle  fpeaks  of  no  a(5l 
"  of  the  divine  pov\^er,  to  coUedt  the  fcat- 
*'  tered  particles  of  matter,  which  compofed 
*'  the  bodies  of  men,  and  reftore  them  to 
"  their  original  place  and  office.  —  But  it  is 
"  reafonable  to  fuppofe,  that  the  fame  be- 
"  ing  wbcfe  wifdom  and  power  are  never 
"  limited  in  their  operations,  is  able  to  fur- 
"  nifli  mankind  with  bodies  (di  fuch  mate- 
'*  rials  and  of  fuch  a  confiflence,  as  (liall 
'•  be  pcrfedly  adapted  to  the  ftate  in  which 
"  they  ihall  appear  and  a6l  -f-." 

*  The  Reverend  ?\Ir.  ^[ohn  Jlexanders  parnphrafc, 
vVc.  p.  87.  t   Ibu!.  p.  S5. 


Thcfc 


3 


APPENDIX.  53 

Thefe  citations  ferve  to  fhew,  that  the  re- 
furredion-body,  has  no  fort  of  dependence 
on  this  frail  body,  nor  any  connexion  with 
it.  And  that  it  is  alfo  an  inflantaneous  pro- 
dudion  of  divine  power. 

The  common  opinion  he  explodes,  'viz, 
that  of  the  re-union  of  the  foul  to  its  former 
body,  which  is  attended  with  two  difficulties. 
"  Firfiy  that  the  heavenly  happinefs  is  nei- 
^'  ther  completed  at  once,  nor  gradually  in- 
"  creafes,  but  is  given  at  firft  in  fome  low 
"  degrees,  and  afterwards  arrives,  in  an  in- 
"  ftant,  at  its  height  and  perfection,  when 
"  the  body  is  raifed.  And.  feco?idiy,  that  it 
"  muft  alv^'ays  be  a  confiderable  difficulty 
"  with  thinking  minds  to  conceive,  why 
"  the  honour  and  reward  of  a  future  ftate, 
"  fhould  be  reprefented  as  depending  more 
"  upon  the  revival  of  the  body  long  fince 
mouldered  away,  than  upon  the  prefence 
of  God  and  of  Chrift,  the  fociety  of  an- 
gels and  bleffed  fpirits,  and  the  exercife 
and  improvement  of  all  divine  and  focial 
virtues.  All  which  enjoyments,  upon  thefe 
principles,  are  prior  to  a  refjrredion  of  the 
flefli,  and  for  any  thing  we  know,  capable 
of  riling-  in  infinite  prog-reffion  without  it." 

^'  ThefQ 


<c 


54  APPENDIX. 

Thefe,  undoubtedly,  are  great  abfurdities. 
Butj  they  have  no  place  at  all  -,  if  we  fup- 
pofe  a  refurredion  body  immediately  give?!, 
by  an  a6t  of  divine  power.  And  why  we 
may  not  conclude  upon  it,  I  do  not  under- 
hand. Pray  what  reafon  can  be  afTigned  for 
the  fufpenfion  of  this  a6t  of  divine  power, 
which  is  never  limited  in  its  operation  ?  ef- 
pecially,  when  the  foul  is  conceived  of  as  hav- 
ing no  more  concern  for  ever  with  this  frail 
body  ?  or,  what  are  we  to  underftand  by  that 
refurredion  body,  which,  by  an  immediate 
adl  of  divine  power,  rifes  fpiritual  and  im- 
mortal ?  where  is  the  foul  in  the  intermedi- 
ate ftate  ?  could  it  not  ad  without  the  frail 
bodily  organs  ?  how  came  we  to  know  it 
could  not,  when  an  apoftle  did  not  ?  fee  2 
Cor.  xii.  2,  3.  whether  i?2  the  hdy,  or  out  of  the 
body,  I  cannot  tell. — But  I  would  farther  afk, 
how  is  it  that  St.  Faul  was  caught  up  into  the 
third  heaven,  and  faw  things  unutterable  ? 
how  was  it,  that  St.  'John  had  his  revelations 
and  villous  of  the  heavenly  world  ?  and  how 
v/as  it,  that  St.  Stephen  faw  Jefus  (landing 
ready  to  receive  his  departing  fpirit,  if  the 
diilblution  of  this  body,  is  that  which  renders 
the  mind  inconfcious  ?  Nay,  how  is  God,  not 

the- 


APPENDIX.  55 

the  God  of  the  dead,  but  of  the  Having,  if  all  the 
pious  dead  do  not  live  to  him  ?  and  how  is 
Jefus  Chrift  Lord  both  of  the  dead  a7id  of  the 
Uvingy  if  the  dead  do  not  feel  the  benefit  of 
his  Lordfhip  ?  does  he  exercife  it  over  in- 
confcious  beings  ! 

The  idea  of  an  infinite  number  of  Adam% 
defcendants,  being  all  blotted  out  of  life,  ex- 
cept the  few  tranfient  inhabitants  of  this 
globe,  is  very  fhocking  !  much  more  pleafing 
is  the  fuppofition,  that  the  fame  being,  whofe 
wifdom  and  power  are  never  limited  in  their 
operations,  does  daily  furnifii  the  pious  dead 
with  bodies  perfedly  well  adapted  to  a  better 
ftate  and  world.- — It  furely  is  not  reafonable 
to  imagine,  that  chriftians  can  triumph  over 
death  and  the  grave,  upon  the  fcheme  of  the 
foul  fleeper. — But,  by  the  immediate  beftow* 
ment  of  a  refurredion  body,  the  dominion  of 
death  is  actually  made  void ;  and  that  fame 
Word  m  which  was  Ife,  a?id  the  Ufe  was  the 
light  of  men  from  the  beginning,  remains  to 
be  fo,  as  it  tabernacles  with  the  man  Chrift 
Jefus  J  it  thus  does  conftitute  him,  the  re- 
furreBion  and  the  life. 

This,  methinks,  muft  be  the  true  flating 
of  the  cafej  fince  dying  to  a  good  man,  is  no 

more 


56  APPENDIX. 

more  than  quitting  his  momentary  mortal 
connexions.  Moreover,  the  prefent  bodily  or- 
ganization is  very  unfuitable  to  more  fublime, 
ipiritual  and  blifsful  fcenes.  Meats  are  for 
the  belly,  and  the  belly  for  meats,  but  God  JJjall 
dejlroy  both  it  and  them.  The  destruction  can- 
not extend  farther.  But  becaufe  the  mind 
has  attained  to  a  genuine  fpirituality,  it  can- 
not be  found  naked  or  unprovided  with  a 
proper  vehicle ;  it  v/ill  have  an  houfe  from 
heaven  j  and  fo  it  is  that  mortality  Jlmll  be 
fwallowed  up  of  life. — Thus  underftood,  the 
life-givifig  Word  was  ever  and  will  ever  be 
the  light  of  men.  And  this  is  the  fenfe  of 
St.  Faul,  when  he  reprefents  the  Gofpel  as 
a  new  creation,  and  the  Mofaic  ritual  as  old 
things  that  are  paffed  away ;  yet  he  fays,  all 
things  are  of  God.  2  Cor.  v.  17,  i8.  '*  q.  d. 
whatever  concerns  religion  owes  its  birth  and 
progrefs  entirely  to  the  fupreme  mind.  He 
is  the  prime  intelligent  adive  caufe,  and  the 
LIFE  of  the  whole  difpenfation.  For  even 
under  the  Gofpel  difpenfation,  no  other  be- 
ings have  any  fhare,  in  the  execution  of  the 
fcheme,  but  as  fubordinate  agents  "*."  . 

*  Confult  Alexander'^  paraphrafc,  p.  67,  notes, 

THE    END. 


„.>.:icVT 


•ff 


i 


%r