Skip to main content

Full text of "An architectural monograph on colonial architecture in Vermont"

See other formats


Digitized  by  the  Internet  Archive 

in  2008  with  funding  from 

IVIicrosoft  Corporation 


http://www.archive.org/details/architecturalmonOOchaprich 


WHITE  PINE 

^E'RIES  OP 

(Arcbitectural  oVLonograpljs 


Coloniale>irehlteeture 

in. 

VERMONT 


*l/\rittf  IniroductoryText  by- 
George  S  Chappell 


Copyright,  1918 

George  F.  Lindsay,  Chairman 

White  Pine  Bureau 

saint  paul,  minnesota 


SSSM 


MMBS 


THE  GENERAL  STRONG  HOUSE.  VERGENNES,  VERMONT. 


T&WHITE  PINE,  SLRIES^ 

ARCHITECTURAL  MONOGRAPHS 

A  BI-MONTLY  PUBLIGKTION  vSUGGC5TING  TE 
ARCmXCTURAL  USLS  (J  WHITL  PINE  A^D  ITS 
ANLABLITY  TODAi' AS  A  STRUCTURAL  W5X) 


Vol.  IV 


DECEMBER,  1918 


No.  6 


COLONIAL  ARCHITECTURE  IN  VERMONT 

Bf  GEORGE  S.  CHAPPELL 

Again  we  are  fortunate  in  having  in  Mr,  Chappell  another  close  student  of  the  domestic  architecture  of  the  Colonists.  After 
graduating  from  Vale,  Mr.  Clutppell  continued  his  studies  at  the  Ecole  des  Beaux-Arts  until  1902.  Since  then  he  has  been  prac- 
tising architecture  in  New  York,  for  a  time  in  partnership  with  Charles  Ewing  and  at  present  independently. — Editor's  Note. 

PHOTOGRAPHS  BY    KENNETH   CLARK 


CURIOUS  and  interesting  indeed  is  the 
invariable  accuracy  with  which  the 
architecture  of  a  particular  locality 
mutely  spells  its  history.  Not  less  engaging  is 
this  historic  aspect  when  its  lesson  lies  not  on 
the  surface  but  deeply  buried  in  the  meshes  of 
circumstance  which  must  first  be  explored  before 
arriving  at  glimmerings  of  the  truth.  Such  is 
the  case  with  the  fair  Green  Mountain  State. 
The  architectural  history  of  Vermont  is  yet  to 
be  written.  It  exists,  doubtless,  not  only  in  the 
noble  houses  which  have  been  preserved,  but 
likewise  in  the  town  records  of  many  a  valley 
village, — records,  praise  be,  which  are  gradually 
being  crystallized  into  useful  collections  by  the 
beneficent  agencies  of  various  societies  of  por- 
tentous and  dignified  titles,  such  as  the  "Society 
for  the  Preservation  of  New  England  Antiqui- 
ties." But,  as  yet,  the  historians  have  said  little 
specifically  of  the  charming  towns  west  of  Con- 
necticut which,  by  leaps  and  bounds,  are  attain- 
ing a  national  pre-eminence  as  foci  of  rest  and 
recreation  for  thousands  of  brain-fagged  ur- 
banites. 

Other  sections  of  What  we  may  properly  call 
our  Colonial  country  have  had,  each,  their 
scribes.  The  coast  towns,  without  exception, 
accessible  by  main  railway  lines  and  the  more 
alluring  water  routes,  have  long  stood  as  mile- 
stones on  the  itinerary  of  the  zealous  draughts- 
man, the  prying  historian  and,  last  but  by  no 
means  least,  the  man  behind  the  camera.  Who, 
among  the  architectural  profession  or  in  the 
splendid  brotherhood  of  kindred  souls  to  whom 
our  old  houses  are  precious,  vital  things,  can 


look  back  with  aught  but  keenest  pleasure  to  the 
occasional  visit  of  that  rare  character,  Frank 
Cousins,  whose  valuable  records  of  Salem,  Ports- 
mouth, Newburyport  and  Marblehead  were 
invariably  illumined  by  his  quaint  anecdotes 
and  observations?  The  very  accent  of  the  man 
went  with  the  pictures,  and  his  point  of  view 
and  method  of  what  I  can  only  tactfully  term 
"distribution"  were  in  wonderfully  refreshing 
contrast  to  the  cock-sure  briskness  of  many  a 
brick  merchant,  refrigerator  vendor  or  miscella- 
neous patent-pusher  who,  in  normal  times,  form 
an  unending  line  at  the  outer  portals  of  an  ofllce. 

"Are  these  pictures  for  sale,  Mr.  Cousins?" 
1  asked  him,  at  our  first  meeting. 

His  reply  was  preceded  by  a  look  of  gentle 
surprise  and  reproach  which  I  shall  never  forget. 

"No,  Mr.  Chappell  .  .  .  no, — they  are  not 
for  sale.  I  am  merely  showing  them  to  you.  1 
will  leave  them  here.  I  know  you  will  enjoy 
them,  and  I  give  them  to  you.  You  will  note 
that  they  are  numbered.  Keep  what  you  find 
most  interesting, — later,  perhaps,  if  you  wish 
to  make  me  a  present,  you  may  mail  me  a  check. 
What  a  lovely  mantel  that  is  in  the  Peabody 
house!  I  had  to  bribe  Mrs.  Peabody  with  two 
baskets  of  Northern  Spies  before  she  would  let 
me  photograph  it,"  etc. 

In  Dutch  Colonial,  Long  Island  and  New 
York,  along  the  Georgian  River  James,  in 
Charleston  and  Savannah, — up  and  down  the 
coast  have  ranged  the  recorders  of  our  historic 
past, — but  of  Vermont  we  find  nothing.  It  is, 
then,  with  a  peculiar  elation  that  I  have  under- 
taken this  little  monograph,  with  something  of 


THE  WHITE  PINE  MONOGRAPH  SERIES 


THE  OLD  CONSTITUTION  HOUSE,  WINDSOR,  VERMONT. 


HOUSE  AT  MIDDLEBURY,  VERMONT. 


COLONIAL  ARCHITECTURE  IN  VERMONT 


5 


the  feeling  of  a  humble  explorer,  a  traveller  into 
"green  fields  and  pastures  new"  in  our  frag- 
mentary world  of  architectural  letters. 

The  mass  impression,  the  total  result,  is  per- 
haps the  most  trustworthy  gauge  of  value  by 
which  to  standardize  an  appreciation.  In  many 
cases  this  is  extremely  difficult.  New  England 
Colonial  architecture,  in  the  general  sense  of  the 
term,  runs  a  wide  gamut  of  expression  from  the 
early  17th  century  survivals — in  many  ways  the 
most  absorbingly  interesting  of  our  relics — to 
the  late  18th  century  period  whose  delicate  life 


colonies,  waged  for  years  a  most  desperate 
struggle  for  her  political  existence.  Planted  be- 
tween the  great  and  vague  grants  of  the  Colonies 
of  New  York  and  New  Hampshire,  the  green  hills 
and  valleys  between  the  Connecticut  and  the 
Hudson  were  a  veritable  no-man's-land,  con- 
stantly in  dispute,  constantly  changing  hands  ac- 
cording to  who  drew  the  last  map  or  last  had  the 
ear  of  the  King's  Council,  and, consequently, con- 
stantly neglected.  While  thriving  towns  were 
being  built  in  the  defined  areas  of  Massachusetts 
and  Connecticut,  the  wildernesses  of  the  interior 


THE  GENERAL  STRUNG  IIULSi:.  \  LRGLNMib,  \  hK.MUN  1. 


was  finally  crushed  out  by  the  heavy  hand  of  the 
Greek  revival.  Each  type  and  phase  must  be 
considered  and  appraised  separately,  for  they 
are  distinct  links  in  the  chain. 

In  Vermont,  however,  we  find  a  striking 
homogeneity  of  architectural  expression,  an  al- 
most unvarying  type  which  makes  it  possible 
to  judge  the  value  of  this  little  known  contribu- 
tion by  a  single  standard. 

This  brings  me,  by  a  very  devious  route,  I 
must  confess,  to  the  thought  expressed  in  my 
initial  paragraph,  namely,  that  this  very  homo- 
geneity must  perforce  have  its  reason  in  the 
actual  history  of  the  State.  Nor  is  this  reason 
far  to  seek  or  hard  to  find.  We  forget,  perhaps, 
that  Vermont,  more  than  any  of  our  original 


were  left  to  the  Indians  and  the  animals.  It 
was  not  until  1724  that  the  first  white  settlement 
in  the  present  State  of  Vermont  was  founded  at 
Fort  Dummer,  south  of  Brattleboro.  The  real 
tide  of  emigration  did  not  set  in  until  1760,  be- 
tween which  period  and  the  outbreak  of  the 
Revolution  a  bitter  controversy  was  waged  be- 
tween the  hardy  pioneers  who  had  pushed  into 
the  forests,  and  the  more  calculating  governors 
of  the  coastal  communities  who  saw  in  such  ex- 
ploration only  an  enlargement  of  their  own 
boundaries.  So  acute  did  this  quarrel  become 
that  Governor  Tryon  of  New  York  formally 
placed  a  bounty  of  £150  on  the  head  of  no 
less  a  person  than  Ethan  Allen,  who,  later,  at 
Ticonderoga,  blazed  his  way  to  a  glory  which 


THE  WHITE  PINE  MONOGRAPH  SERIES 


has  sufficiently  dimmed  the  luster  of  his  former 
powerful  antagonist. 

Throughout  the  entire  Revolutionary  War. 
Vermont  fought  nobly  as  an  independent,  un- 
official group  of  settlers,  and  it  was  not  until 
1791  that  she  was  finally  formally  admitted  into 
the  Union,— a  belated  recognition  which,  in  the 
light  of  her  splendid  history  and  services,  we 
should  not  hesitate  nowadays  to  term  "a  raw 
deal." 

Be  that  as  it  may,  here  is  the  plain  explana- 
tion of  Vermont's  singleness  of  style  in  her  early 
architecture.     Of   the    very   earliest,    the    17th 


dwellings,  the  period  of  the  sturdy  Georgian 
detail  of  Deerfield  and  Longmeadow,  was  still 
too  early  for  the  fluctuating,  battledore-and- 
shuttlecock  existence  of  the  struggling  colony. 
Vermont  came  into  full  architectural  being  just 
after  the  transition  in  styles  had  been  effected 
which  parallels  interestingly  what  has  happened 
recently  in  New  York  City  and,  in  lesser  degree, 
throughout  the  entire  United  States.  In  a  word, 
the  first  Adam  craze  was  on, — perhaps  not  the 
very  first,  but  leaving  the  great  original  out 
of  the  discussion,  the  first  architectural  Adam 
was   certainly   the   great   popular   style  of   the 


HOUSE  AT  WINDSOR,  VERMONT. 


century  and  early  18th  century  type,  there  is 
practically  none.  It  was  not  until  the  State  was 
recognized  and  established  that  its  staunch  citi- 
zens began  to  build  the  dignified  homes  which 
we  find  in  the  lovely  villages  of  Rutland,  Wind- 
sor, Middlebury,  and  Vergennes. 

The  architectural  derivation  is  as  clear  as  the 
historical  reasons  for  it.  One  has  but  to  turn 
the  pages  of  Asher  Benjamin's  delightful 
"Country  Builders'  Assistant,  fully  explaining 
the  Best  Methods  for  striking  Regular  and 
Quirked  Mouldings"  to  see  the  hand  of  time 
pointing  with  no  uncertain  finger  at  the  skilful 
carpenter  of  Greenfield  whose  name  is  writ 
large  over  the  entire  State  of  Vermont. 

The    period    subsequent    to    our    first    stark 


new  State.  It  was  between  1773  and  1798  that 
Robert  and  James  Adam  published  the  splendid 
series  of  engravings  of  their  undying  monuments 
to  a  phase  of  English  architecture  which  stands 
for  the  utmost  delicacy  and  refinement  of  Britain 
as  clearly  as  Louis  Seize  indicates  the  culture  of 
France.  This  was  the  fount  from  which  Asher 
Benjamin  drew  his  inspiration.  His  vessel  was 
no  royal  tankard,  but  the  water  it  held  was  pure. 
Far  from  being  a  servile  copyist,  he  translated 
the  proportions  of  cornice  and  column  from 
terms  of  stone  to  wood  with  a  niceness  of  judg- 
ment and  delicacy  of  appreciation  of  the  mate- 
rial he  was  working  in  that  has  earned  him  an 
undying  and  enviable  place  in  the  architectural 
history  of  America. 


e 


H 
Z 

o 

> 

Q 
Z 
< 

-1 
(- 

cd 

< 

O 

X 


c 
u 


10 


THE  WHITE  PINE  MONOGRAPH  SERIES 


Strange,  how  history 
repeats  herself!  The 
Ritz  hotels,  the  Stattler 
hotels,  the  many  new 
apartment  houses  on 
Park  Avenue,  in  New 
York, — everywhere  we 
are  rushing  to  Adam. 
It  is  a  fad,  a  phase,  a 
transitory  enthusiasm, 
but  it  will  leave  charm- 
ing results  behind  it.  If 
I  were  asked  to  coin  a 
modern  expression  for 
the  early  architecture  of 
Vermont,  1  should  say 
they  did  "wooden  Ritz" 
— and  1  think  1  should 
be  understood. 

It  is  a  sophisticated 
art,  but  an  art  still  sound 
and  vigorous.  Canons 
of  judgment  in  these 
matters  are  peculiarly 
personal,  and  my  indi- 
vidual rating  of  our  na- 
tional periods  gives  first 
place  to  the  earlier,  more  naive  structures  in 
which  the  broader  elements  of  mass  and  propor- 
tion, fenestration  and  austere  profile  seem  to  fail 


Cornice  Detail. 

THE  WAINWRIGHT  HOUSE, 

MIDDLEBURY,  VERMONT. 


into  a  harmony  that  is 
inevitable  and  was,  prob- 
ably, unconscious.  Ver- 
mont is  not  without  her 
examples  of  this  chaste 
style,  as  in  the  old  Con- 
stitution House  in  Wind- 
sor, illustrated  on  page  4, 
built  in  1777,  and  hap- 
pily restored  with  a  rev- 
erent regard  to  the  an- 
cient law  of  severity. 

More  characteristic  by 
far,  however,  are  such 
bits  of  pure  Adam  detail 
as  the  charming  door  of 
the  Sherman  Evarts 
House,  also  in  Windsor, 
illustrated  on  page  12, 
or  the  ingenious  inter- 
laced frieze  on  one  of  the 
stately  residences  of 
Middlebury,  known  as 
the  Wainwright  House, 
which  strikingly  illus- 
trates the  addition  to  a 
classic  background  of  a  motive  which  could  be 
properly  executed  in  wood,  and  wood  alone. 
Less  fortunate,  but  of  singular  interest  in  illus- 


HOUSE  AT  CASTLETON,  VERMONT. 


COLONIAL  ARCHITECTURE  IN  VERMONT 


II 


trating  a  subtle  approach 
to  the  decadence  of  over- 
refinement,  is  the  curious 
porch  of  the  Meecham- 
Ainsworth  House  in 
Castleton,  illustrated  on 
page  13,  where  we  see 
the  ingenuity  of  the  skil- 
ful workman  combining 
three  types  of  arches,  the 
semicircle,  the  elliptical 
and  the  stilted, in  a  single 
motif.  Far  more  than 
the  usual  refinement  in 
design  and  proportion 
are  found  in  the  Genera! 
Strong  House  at  Ver- 
gennes.  Frontispiece  and 
page  5.  Here  General 
Strong  lived  while  he 
and  Macdonough  were 
building  the  fleet  which 
won  the  Battle  of  Lake 
Champlain. 

In  general,  we  may  say 
of  the  Colonial  architec- 
ture of  Vermont  that  it 
was  a  true  and  dignified  expression  of  the  eco- 
nomic conditions  of  its  period,  nor  can  we  ask 
more  of  any  generation,     in  its  studious  devel- 


Cornice 
THE  SHERMAN 
WINDSOR, 


opment  of  classic  orna- 
ment and  general  excel- 
lence of  taste  it  goes  far 
to  rebut  the  quaint  as- 
sumption of  J.  Norman, 
an  earlier  precursor  of 
Asher  Benjamin,  who 
prefaces  his  hand-book 
with  the  encouraging 
statement  that  architec- 
ture should  be  univer- 
sally practiced,  as  it  is 
"so  easy  as  to  be  ac- 
quired in  leisure  times, 
when  the  Business  of  the 
Da>'  is  over,  by  way  of 
Diversion." 

1  herewith  formally 
pin  upon  Mr.  Norman's 
breast  a  medal,  proclaim- 
ing him  to  be  the  great 
originator  of  that  vast 
army  of  home-builders 
who  firmly  believe  that 
they  planned  their  own 
houses  and  that  the  ar- 
chitect merely  drew  some 
white  lines  on  blue  paper  putting  on  some  figures 
and  arranged  the  staircase  so  that  it  did  not  end 
in  the  living-room  fireplace. 


Detail. 
EVARTS  HOUSE, 
VERMONT. 


THE  SHERMAN  EVARTS  HOUSE,  WINDSOR,  VERMONT. 


12 


THE  WHITE  PINE  MONOGRAPH  SERIES 


ENTRANCE   DETAILS. 


HOUSE  AT  MIDDLEBURY, 
VERMONT. 


THE  SHERMAN  EVARTS  HOUSE, 
WINDSOR,  VERMONT. 


ENTRANCE    DETAILS. 
THE  JOHONNOT  HOUSE.  WINDSOR,   VERMONT.  HOUSE  AT  CASTLETON,  VERMONT. 


z 

o 
s 

> 

of 

O 
to 

si 

ID   m 


O 

u 
z 

< 

J 

H 
H 
U 

52 

< 

u 

I 

H 


H 
Z 

o 
s 

> 

z" 

o 

H 
UJ 

-1 
H 

< 

U 


<: 

UJ 


3 
O 

I 
i- 
ai. 

i 

z 

< 

I 
u 

LU 
U 

S 


THE  FULLER  1  UN  HUUSE,  WINDSOR,  VERMONT.    Entrance  Detail. 


WHITE  PINE-AND  WHERE  TO  USE  IT 

II 

SPECIFICATION  CLAUSES  FOR  A  HOUSE  OF  THE  HIGHEST  GRADE 

WHERE  QUALITY  IS  FIRST  AND  COST  A 

SECONDARY  CONSIDERATION 

Prepared  by  LOUIS  ROBERT  HOLSKE 

specification  IVriter  for  McKim,  Mead  &■  IVhite,  /Irchitects 

In  the  introductory  article  to  "White  Pine — and  Where  to  Use  It,"  it  was  stated  that  a  short  cut  was  needed  to  help  the  architect  to 
incorporate  the  information  contained  in  the  White  Pine  Standard  Grading  Rules  Book  into  his  specifications.  It  is  hoped  that 
the  data  presented  in  this  article  is  in  such  form  as  to  be  not  only  of  value,  but  also  of  practical  use. — Editor's  Note. 


THOUGH  there  is  no  universal  form  of 
specification  for  a  given  building,  each 
architect  having  his  own  method  of  in- 
dicating the  requirements  as  to  material  and 
workmanship,  the  White  Pine  Bureau  offers  the 
following  Specification  for  White  Pine,  which 
may  be  incorporated  into  any  form  in  current 
use.  In  working  it  out  it  has  been  borne  in  mind 
that  to  be  of  use  to  architects  it  must  be  as  con- 
cise as  possible.  Clause  A  will  be  common  to 
the  specifications  for  the  three  classes  of  house. 
Ihe  application  has  been  divided  into  three 
clauses,  B,  C,  and  D,  for  structural,  exterior  and 
interior  uses  respectively.  C  and  D  could 
readily  be  united  in  the  interest  of  greater 
brevity.  This,  however,  would  be  affected  by 
the  classification  adopted  by  the  architect  in 
writing  his  specification.  Some  architects  clas- 
sify everything  in  woodwork  under  Carpentry, 
others  divide  it  into  Rough  Carpentry,  Exterior 
Finish  and  Interior  Finish,  etc. 

The  fact  has  often  been  emphasized  that 
"blanket  clauses"  are  ambiguous  and  that  their 
interpretation  invariably  adds  appreciably  to 
the  cost  of  the  structure.  In  spite  of  the  fact 
that  there  are  comparatively  few  instances 
where  it  is  necessary  to  use  absolutely  Clear 
White  Pine,  architects  often  make  the  mistake 
of  specifying  "Clear  White  Pine"  for  all  uses, 
where  in  many  cases  a  lower  grade  would  be 
more  suitable  and  considerably  less  expensive. 
The  client  would  have  as  satisfactory  and  as 
durable  a  house;  the  architect  would  gain  pres- 
tige through  creating  a  house  which  combines 
maximum  quality  with  proper  cost.  Clear 
White  Pine  for  sash,  doors  and  blinds,  however, 
does  not  come  in  this  category,  as  sash,  doors 
and  blinds  are  products  of  factories  and  are  cut 
from  White  Pine  stock  which  yields  the  required 
amount  of  clear  wood,  although  the  nomen- 
clature of  the  grade  from  which  it  is  cut  is  not 


"Clear."  This  grade  is  known  as  "White  Pine 
Factory  Lumber"  and  is  essentially  for  cutting- 
up  purposes,  or  other  shop  uses  where  sections  ot 
clear  lumber  are  required. 

There  are  three  fundamental  sets  of  White 
Pine  Standard  Grading  Rules,  one  or  more  of 
which  is  familiar  to  all  White  Pine  wholesale 
and  retail  lumber  dealers  throughout  the  United 
States.  The  architect  should  determine  which 
of  these  three  is  applicable  in  the  territory  of 
the  contemplated  building  before  writing  his 
specification.  Any  contractor  or  local  retail 
lumber  dealer  should  be  able  to  give  him  this 
information.  The  architect  can  then  specify 
the  grades  under  whichever  of  the  three  sets 
applies.  It  may  be  found  that  White  Pine  is 
sometimes  sold  by  lumber  dealers  under  local 
names,  although  the  dealer  has  purchased  the 
lumber  from  the  manufacturers  under  one  of  the 
three  standard  sets  of  grades.  Every  dealer  must 
therefore  know  the  grades  as  called  for  in  the 
accompanying  Specification,  and  there  is  no  ex- 
cuse for  any  confusion  or  misinterpretation. 

While  White  Pine  is  the  wood  par  excellence 
for  all  construction  uses,  there  may  be,  perhaps, 
a  question  as  to  the  advisability  of  specifying  it 
for  general  framing  purposes.  Clause  B  of  the 
model  Specification  states  the  grades  which 
should  be  used  if  it  is  decided  to  build  of  White 
Pine  throughout.  There  are  other  structural 
woods,  lower  in  cost  and  almost  equal  to  White 
Pine,  for  sills,  posts,  girders,  etc.,  but  for  studding 
and  framing  for  doors  and  windows  it  is  par- 
ticularly recommended.  There  is  no  shrinkage 
nor  swelling,  no  warping  nor  twisting,  in  White 
Pine,  and  a  door  or  window  hung  in  a  White 
Pine  frame  will  not  stick  or  bind,  nor  will  the 
plaster  crack.  In  these  cases  the  slight  extra 
first  cost  is  more  than  offset  by  the  future  sav- 
ing in  repairs. 

[Over 


g 

< 

a 

;z 

o 
u 

< 

Q 

o 
u 

uu 

?r       < 


CO 
O 


a. 


o 

[JU 

UJ 

< 

—3 

u 
o 

< 

y 

a- 

U 
tu 

CO 


o 
u 

< 

H 

^    lO 
to     — 

< 

^  t 

< 

n: 


< 

O 

H 

CD 
X 
O 


-J 
O 

X 

i~ 

UJ 
DQ 
O 

ai 

5 
o 


^ 


UJ 

X 
H 

u. 
O 

u 

D 
O 

X 


fri 

c 

O 

a. 

u 

c 

u 

N 

f 

> 

t: 

o 

■r, 

Z 

tfS 

?i 

^ 

o 

S 

u 

3 

Qi 

n 

3 

g- 

C 

•S 

J= 

o 

4-* 

K 

« 

u 

nt 

a 

^1 

a  3 

•  S   i£   w 

"i.  £  "^ 

n'>"  = 
"era 
•^  o)  S 
a  E  5 

OT3  o 

^S^ 

'  0) 

a  a>  *^ 

■£  =  ■*- 
a.  g  o 

«  si 


>s_- 


« 


■^■r.  S 


—  .2    S 
S 


rt  Kj 


C         ^ 

O  rt  a> 

S  ™j= 
-■"^ 

4>  >, 


"-    DO 

|i§ 

O  OJ  Q 
-C  jO   "^ 

T3  =  < 


a>  —  3 

c        w 

ft.  ij  re 

41   3   3 

c  o  Q^ 

t  c  _ 
Z  o  «J 

-  S^ 

2     -  ^- 

•£  t-  O 

<"  u  T 

111*,  c 
(/> ,      o 


S    g03 

d      SS 


C3 

.<?« 

3  c 

S^ 

c 

^  c 

o 

V  o 

rlH 

c 

OJ 

E 

E 

H 

a 

u 

c 

c 

0. 

0. 

V 

u 

jC 

J= 

^ 

^ 

-. 

» 

o 

o 

Z 

Z 

n.2 


Ph-«I 


S.S 


0<->i! 


Da 

IS 

d 
Z 


c 
in 


a 
a 


c 

o 

0) 

^ 

V 

F 

E 

H 

Q 

o 

1) 

c 

c 

0. 

Q. 

O) 

4> 

j: 

J3 

^ 

^ 

-. 

— 

o 

O 

z 

Z 

D.    OJ 

c   c 
£  Ql 

Ic  is 

^^ 

d  d 
ZZ 


o 

CO 

c 

OT3 

ES 

^- 

^a 

_  n 

.      .s 


c 


73 

c 


oa 


CO 


J. 

C 

u. 

8 

u. 

u 

a> 

0* 

E 

O. 

3 

01 

-J 

b 

.c 

(J 

u. 

a> 

c 

j= 

l.:Da 

^ 

oa 

oa 


c 

o 

b. 

en 

01 

C 

.c 

0) 

E 

E 

H 

Q 

u 

u 

c 

c 

ft. 

ft. 

u 

J= 

J= 

^ 

> 

— 

-. 

o 

o 

z 

Z 

r-  (u  (u  (u      gj  (u 

^  4.*  4.4  4.4       *rf  ^^7:^ 


-a 


0.  a. 


O 
03 

c 
p  "" 

3   'J 

ot: 


^^         ^t 


d  o  o 
ZZ 


03 

•a 
c 
n 

4i4 

■33 
to 


u  bo 

E    3 

ft-lc 
«>-3 


4."  Ml 


:u. 


1 

OD 

OD 

3 

BO 

3 

•n 
0 

3 

•n 

•a 

X 

0 

to 

3 

■£ 

4J 

u. 

0) 

03 

E 

3 

c 

0^ 

•a 

3 

0 

IE 

U 

03 

£ 

0> 

0) 

03 

V. 

0) 

3 

0) 

oa 

§1 

-0 

3 

JZ 

_c 

U-CQ 

* . 

^ 

^ 

ca 

CQ 

2     S    P 


1- 

U 
•a 

3 

k. 

m 

a 

!^ 

a 

rt 

:_) 

03 

CD 


0) 

01 

3 

3 

a.  Ml 

a. 

(U.5 

0) 

^■"1  ^ 


T3 

n 

u 

on 


••   3 

03  t 


2"- 
u 


u 

n 

Q. 

•n 

3 

ID 

•K 

3 

0 

ra 

a 

^ 

600 

* 

-n 

-0 

3 

.2  '■ 

(A 

E 

k. 

0 

Ui 

t4- 

0 

« 

bO 

c 

lA 

5b 

(nT3  i 

0 

k. 

— >D 

o 

J3 


T3 
3 
CD 


BO 

3 
O 


•  •       V) 

Is. 


o,.£ 
_  "E 
•S  o 


h.  3  OJ 

BO  OIC 

•£  -  D. 

4-*  ^4"     l#» 


.20 

^1! 


o 

k- 

o 
•c 


o  o  ■ 

2"- 

u 


5 


u. 


—  I"        -3 

«  2  ,   S 

j=  3 

">  o 


<^ 

u. 

OJ 

OJ 

4-> 

CO 

CQ 

-a 

•0 

c 

a 

4-» 

u 

u 

CO 

c^ 

oa 

5 

Q 

V 

u 

3 

3 

0- 

or 

ft. 

a> 

c 

0) 

.t::.c 

.c 

.3 

^ 

^ 

3 


o 
•c 


9  o 

u 


List  of  Members  oj' 

THE   NORTHERN    PINE   MANUFACTURERS'   ASSOCIATION   OF 

MINNESOTA,  WISCONSIN  AND  MICHIGAN 

W.  T.  Bailey  Lumber  Company Virginia,  Minn. 

Cloquet  Lumber  Company Cloquet,  Minn. 

Crookston  Lumber  Company Bemidji,  Minn. 

DuLUTH  Log  Company        Duluth,  Minn. 

International  Lumber  Company International  Falls,  Minn. 

Johnson-Wentworth  Company       Cloquet,  Minn. 

The  J.  Neils  Lumber  Company Cass  Lake,  Minn. 

Nichols-Chisholm  Lumber  Company Frazee,  Minn. 

Northland  Pine  Company Minneapolis,  Minn. 

The  Northern  Lumber  Company Cloquet,  Minn. 

Pine  Tree  Manufacturing  Company Little  Falls,  Minn. 

Rust-Owen  Lumber  Company Drummond,  Wis. 

St.  Croix  Lumber  &  Mfg.  Company Winton,  Minn. 

Shevlin-Clarke  Company,  Ltd Fort  Frances,  Ont. 

J.  S.  Stearns  Lumber  Company Odanah,  Wis. 

The  1.  Stephenson  Company Wells,  Mich. 

The  Virginia  &  Rainy  Lake  Company Virginia,  Minn. 


List  of  Members  of 
THE  ASSOCIATED  WHITE   PINE  MANUFACTURERS  OF  IDAHO 

Blackwell  Lumber  Company Coeur  d'  Alene,  Idaho 

Bonners  Ferry  Lumber  Company Bonners  Ferry,  Idaho 

Dover  Lumber  Company Dover,  Idaho 

Humbird  Lumber  Company Sandpoint,  Idaho 

McGoLDRiCK  Lumber  Company Spokane,  Wash. 

Milwaukee  Land  Company St.  Joe,  Idaho 

Panhandle  Lumber  Company Spirit  Lake,  Idaho 

PoTLATCH  Lumber  Company Potlatch,  Idaho 

Roselake  Lumber  Company Roselake,  Idaho 

Edward  Rutledge  Timber  Company Coeur  d'  Alene,  Idaho. 


I 


Any  information  desired  regarding  H^hite  Pine  ■will  be  furnished 
by  any  member  of  either  jlssociation  or  by  the 

WHITE  PINE  BUREAU 

Merchants  Bank  Building,  Saint  Paul,  Minnesota 

Representing 
The  Northern  Pine  Manufacturers'  Association  of  Minnesota,  Wisconfin 
and  Michigan  and  The  Associated  White  Pine  Manufacturers  of  Idaho 


--JJV 


YP    I  ^.LA'^. 


Sal  LIBRARY -U.C.  BERKELEY 


"-.-..- 

•1 

rHjjmiiignjMig 

m 

ffiiil 

uiyjuMMlMjiigHIjglllU 

'.'■■"•''■>^;i'j;;;',; 


1 

'  :'l'l>:''': 

i^^H^^pHMB^H