Skip to main content

Full text of "Architectural record"

See other formats


ARCHITECT  VRAL 
RECORD 


AN  ILLUSTRATED  MONTHLY  MAGAZINE  OF  ARCHITECTURE 
AND  THE  ALLIED  ARTS  AND  CRAFTS. 


INDEX- VOLUME  XXXVII 


JANUARY— JUNE 

1915 


PUBLISHED   BY 

THE  ARCHITECTURAL  RECORD  CO. 

115-119    WEST    40TH    ST.,    NEW    YORK    CITY 

841  MONADNOCK  BUILDING,  CHICAGO  1211  ARCH  ST.,  PHILADELPHIA 

BESSEMER  BUILDING,  PITTSBURGH  114  FEDERAL  ST.,  BOSTON 


NA 


Copyright,  1915,  by  THE  ARCHITECTURAL  RECORD  Co. 
All  Rights  Reserved 


THE  ARCHITECTURAL  RECORD 

INDEX 

Volume  XXXVII  January-June,   1915 

ARTICLES  PAGE 

ARCHITECT'S  COUNTRY  HOUSE,  AN  :  RESIDENCE  OF  ELEC- 

xus   LITCHFIELD,   NEW   CANAAN,   CONN Harriet  T.  Bottomley 49-63 

ARCHITECT'S  PART  IN  THE  WORLD'S  WORK,  THE Frederick  L.  Ackerman 149-158 

ARCHITECTURAL    RECLAMATION    OF    SMALL    AREAS    IN 

CITIES,  THE Harold  D.  Eberlein 1-25 

CERTAIN  PHASES  OF  SPANISH  COLONIAL  ARCHITECTURE.  .  Marrion    Wilcox 535-546 

COLONIAL  ARCHITECTURE  IN  CONNECTICUT,  PART  I Wesley  S.  Bessell 361  369 

COLONIAL  ARCHITECTURE  IN  CONNECTICUT,  PART  II Wesley  S.  Bessell 445-452 

COLONIAL  ARCHITECTURE  IN  CONNECTICUT,  PART  III. ...  Wesley  S.  Bessell 547-556 

COLOR     IN     ARCHITECTURE     AT     THE     PANAMA-PACIFIC 

EXPOSITION Wm.  L.  Woollett 437-444 

GROUPING  OF  FARM  BUILDINGS,  THE:   EXAMPLES  FROM 

THE  WORK  OF  ALFRED  HOPKINS John  J.   Klaber 341-359 

HOTEL  STATLER  IN  DETROIT,  THE W.  Sydney  Wagner 321-339 

HOUSE  OF  HOPE  PRESBYTERIAN  CHURCH,  THE,  ST.  PAUL, 

MINN 441-424 

MEDIAEVAL  MARKET  PLACE  AT  YPRES,  THE G.  A.  T.  Middleton 289-299 

MODERN     VERSION     OF     THE     EARLY     PENNSYLVANIA 

HOUSE,   A. C.   Matlack   Price 76-81 

MONTREAL  ART  GALLERY,  THE Thomas   W.  Ludlow 133  148 

NEW  GENERAL  HOSPITAL  AT  CINCINNATI,  THE. J.   R.   Schmidt 453-463 

NEW  HOME  OF  JOHNS  HOPKINS  UNIVERSITY,  THE .John  Martin  Hammond 481-492 

OLD  CITY  HALL,  THE,  WASHINGTON,  D.  C H.  F.  Cunningham 269-273 

OTIS  AND  CLARK,  EXAMPLES  OF  THE  WORK  OF Herbert    Croly 385-409 

PANAMA-CALIFORNIA  EXPOSITION,  THE,  SAN  DIEGO,  CAL.  C.   Matlack   Price 229-251 

PANAMA- PACIFIC  EXPOSITION  AT  SAN  FRANCISCO,  THE.  .  Louis  C.  Mullgardt 193-228 

PORTFOLIO  OF  CURRENT  ARCHITECTURE 83-92,   177-186,  274280,  370-378,  464-473,  557-562 

PROCTOR,  JOHN  C.,  RECREATION  CENTRE,  THE,  PEORIA,  ILL 1 17-131 

RECENT  ASPECTS  OF  GARDEN  DESIGN Harold  D.  Eberlein 301-319 

ROMAN  ARCHITECTURE  AND  ITS  CRITICS,  PART  I Prof.  A.  D.  F.  Hamlin 425-436 

ROMAN  ARCHITECTURE  AND  ITS  CRITICS,  PART  II Prof.  A.  D.  F.  Hamlin 493-516 

SOME  RECENT   BANK   PLANS,   THE  WORK  OF  THOMAS 

BRUCE  BOYD John  J.  Klaber 97-115 

THREE  TYPES  OF  GEORGIAN  ARCHITECTURE,  PART  II Harold  D.  Eberlein 159-176 

TRINITY  LUTHERAN  CHURCH,  AKRON,  O I.  T.  Frary 253-267 

Two  DENTAL  BUILDINGS  IN  PHILADELPHIA  AND  BOSTON.  .  Harold  D.  Eberlein 517-534 

VILLA  MADAMA,  THE,  PART  II Howard  W.  Germann 27-47 

WASHINGTON  UNIVERSITY,  ST.  Louis,  Mo Guy  Study 65-75 

THE  ARCHITECT'S  LIBRARY    (BOOK  REVIEWS) 

Two  BOOKS  BY  PRACTICAL  THEORISTS,  PART  I Richard   F.   Bach 93-95 

Two  BOOKS  BY  PRACTICAL  THEORISTS,  PART  II Richard   F.   Bach 187-189 

BOOKS  FROM  UNIVERSITY  PRESSES,  PART  I Richard   F.    Bach 281  286 

OLD   PHILADELPHIA    • Harold  D.  Eberlein 286 

BOOKS  FROM  UNIVERSITY  PRESSES,  PART  II Richard   F.   Bach 379-381 

THE  COMMERCIAL  PROBLEM  IN  BUILDINGS ' Herbert   Croly 381-382 

BOOKS  ON  MEDIEVAL  ARCHITECTURE,  PART  I Richard   F.    Bach 474-47* 

BOOKS  ON  MEDIEVAL  ARCHITECTURE,  PART  II Richard    F.    Bach 563-566 

NOTES   AND   COMMENTS 

January:     A  Humorous  Fountain  in  Munich— A  New  Type  of  Open  Air  School. 
February:     Sculpture  and  Architectural  Design— Architectural  Competitions. 
March:     The  First  Garden  City  in  France— Ingenious  Repairs  to  Strasburg  Cathedral— An 

Exposition  of  Art  for  Children— The  Hotel  Biron  a  National  Monument. 
April-     Rough  Texture  Brick  in  a  Large  Composition— An  Authentic  Restoration  of  a  Fine 

Old   Residence— Glass   Houses— The   Lincoln   of   the   People— The   Yale  Bowl  and  the 

Palmer  Stadium. 
May:     A  Seashore  Cottage  at  Nantucket— A  Bank,  Monumental  and  Beautiful— A  Layman 

on  Builders  and  Planning. 
June:     A   Water   Color    Sketch    in   Terra    Cotta— England  s    Imminent    Italian    Revival— A 

Venial  Professional  Transgression— The  Arch  of  Constantme. 


COVER  DESIGNS 

January.  South  Entrance  of  Independence  Hall,  Philadelphia.  Drawing  by  Jack  Manley 
Rose. 

February:     The  Klingentor,  Rothenberg.     Water  Color  Drawing  by  Walter  S.  Schneider. 

March:  Detail  of  Court  of  the  Four  Seasons,  Panama- Pacific  Exposition.  By  Jack  Man- 
ley  Rose  and  Grace  Norton  Rose. 

April:     An  Italian  Garden.     By  C.  Matlack  Price. 

May:     House  Door  at   Oak  Lodge,   Ardmore,    Pa.     Painting  by   Charles   Lennox   Wright. 

June:     Entrance  to  Glynde,  England.     By  C.  Matlack  Price. 

TYPES  OF  BUILDINGS  ILLUSTRATED 

BANKS.  ARCHITECT  PAGE 

Chase  National  Bank Kimball  &  Roosa 98,  100-101 

Banking  House  of  the  Guaranty  Trust  Co York  &  Sawyer 103-110 

Banking  House  of  J.  P.  Morgan  &  Co Trowbridge  &•  Livingston 111-115 

Bank,  Litchfield,  Conn Colonial   449 

BRIDGES. 

Cabrillo  Bridge,  San  Diego  Exposition Cram,  Goodhue  &  Ferguson.  .229,  242 

CHURCHES. 

Chapel  at  Washington  University,  St.  Louis,  Mo...  Cope  &   Stewardson 73 

Balvanera  Chapel,  Church  of  San  Francisco,  City  of 

Mexico 239 

Church  of  San  Diego,  Guanajuato,  Mexico 240 

Trinity  Lutheran  Church,  Akron,  Ohio J.  W.  C.  Corbusier  250-267 

St.  Martin's  Church,  Ypres 290-292 

House  of  Hope  Presbyterian  Church  Cram  &  Ferguson 410-424 

Cathedral  at  Arequipa,  Peru 540 

Chapel  of  The  Wdl    (La  Capilla   Del   Picito)    at 

Guadalupe,  Mexico   541 

Monastery  in  San  Angel,  Mexico 544 

Cathedral  at  Cuernavaca,  Mexico 545 

CLUBS. 

Franklin  Inn  Club,  Philadelphia Francis    D.    Caldwell 14,     15 

Mask  &  \Yig  Club,  Philadelphia  C.  L.  Borie 16 

Poor  Rich'ard  Club,  Philadelphia 17 

Indiana  Hill  Club,  Winnetka,  111 Otis  &  Clark 389,  390 

COMMERCIAL  BUILDINGS. 

Office  of  Mellor  &  Meigs Mellor  &  Meigs   25 

Warehouse  and  Branch  Office  of  the  Rumley  Prod- 
ucts Co.,  Saskatoon,   Can Hill  &  Woltersdorf 470 

Thomas  Church  Bldg.,  Chicago Hill  &  Woltersdorf 471 

Burke  &  James  Bldg.,  Chicago Hill  &  Woltersdorf 472 

Mcyer-Both  Co.  Bldg.,  Chicago Hill  &  Woltersdorf 472 

Thos.  J.  Dee  &  Co Hill  &  Woltersdorf 473 

News-Press  Bldg.,  St.  Joseph,  Mo Eckel  &  Aldrich 561 

DOMESTIC  ARCHITECTURE  (City,  Country  and  Suburban). 
Frame  and  Half-Timber— 

Electus  D.  Litchfield,  Esq.,  New  Canaan,  Conn Electus  D.  Litchfield 49 

W.  E.  Marble,  Esq.,  Greenwich,  Conn Rowe  &  Smith 91 

Farmer's  Cottage,   Estate  of  V.  V.  Brokaw,  Esq., 

Glen  Cove,  L.  I Alfred  Hopkins 342,  347 

Farmer's  Cottage,  Estate  of  Adolph  Mollenhauer, 

Esq.,  Bay  Shore,  L.  I Alfred  Hopkins 350 

Farmer's   Cottage.   Estate  of   Mrs.   Glenn    Stewart, 

Locust  Valley,  L.  I Alfred  Hopkins 356 

Talmadge  House,  Litchfield,  Conn 360,  446 

House  at  Essex,  Conn 362 

House  at  Litchfield,  Conn 363 

Hayden  House,  Essex,  Conn 365 

'Starkey  House,  Essex,  Conn 367 

Oliver  Wolcott  House,  Litchfield,  Conn 368 

Lyman  Smith  House,  Litchfield,  Conn 369 

Geo.  K.  Smith,  Esq.,  St.  Louis  County,  Mo Roth  &  Study 377 

Chas.  M.  Rankin,  Esq.,  Terre  Haute,  Tnd Otis  &  Clark 393 

Wm.  S.  Mason,  Esq.,  Evanston,  111 Otis  &  Clark 402 

John  A.  Jameson,  Hubbard  Woods,  111 Otis  &  Clark 408 

Butler  House,  Litchfield,   Conn 447 

Sheldon  House,  Litchfield,  Conn 448 

Seymour   Homestead,   Litchfield,   Conn 448 

Reeves  House,  Litchfield,  Conn 449 

House  at  Windsor,  Conn 452 

Chas.  Sharp,  Esq.,  Los  Angeles,  Cal B.  Cooper  Corbett 466 

Miss  Alice  M.  Corse,  Nantucket,  Mass Henry  T.  Corse,  Jr 479 


•  >- 

ARCHITECT  PAGE 

Stucco  and  Concrete  — 
W.  Park  Moore,  Esq.,  Elkins  Park,  Pa  .............  Heacock  &  Hokanson  ........  274-276 

W.  Lawrence  Miller,  Esq.,  Elmsford,  N.  Y  ........  John  C.  Moore  .................  277 

Jas.  W.  Thome,  Esq.,  Lake  Forest,  111  .....    ........  Otis  &  Clark  ...................  395 

Walter  R.  Kirk,  Lake  Forest,  111  .................  Otis  &  Clark  ....................  396 

Mrs.  Louise  A.  Denker,  Los  Angeles,  Cal  .........  B.  Cooper  Corbett  ...........  465-467 

C.  F.  Perry,  Esq.,  Hollywood,  Cal  .................  B.  Cooper  Corbett  ..............  466 

C.  Wesley  Roberts,  Esq.,  Los  Angeles,  Cal  .........  B.  Cooper  Corbett  ..............  467 

Brick  and  Stone  — 

Small  Houses  in  Mt.  Vernon  St.,  Boston  ...........  Richard  Arnold  Fisher  ..........     12 

Wm.  T.  Harris,  Esq.,  Villa  Nova,  Pa  ..............  Duhring,   Okie  &  Ziegler  .......     77 

Cliveden,    Germantown,    Philadelphia  ..............................................   159 

Mount  Pleasant,  Philadelphia  .....................................................    168 

The   Woodlands,    Philadelphia  ....................................................   175 

Upsala,  Germantown,  Philadelphia  ................................................     176 

Norton  House,  East  Goshen,  Conn  ..............................................  368-445 

"Pencoyd,"   Bala,    Pa  .............................  Louis  Carter  Baker,  Jr  .......  370-373 

Henry  S.  Drinker,  Esq.,  Wynnewood,  Pa  ..........  Mellor  &  Meigs  ..................  374 

E.  I.  Cudahy,  Esq.,  Chicago  ........................  Otis  &  Clark  ....................  387 

Jas.  Fentress,  Esq.,  Hubbard  Woods,  111  ............  Otis  &  Clark  ....................  404 

EXPOSITION  BUILDINGS. 

Panama-Pacific  Exposition,  San  P'rancisco,  Cal. 
Palace  of  Varied  Industries  .......................  Bliss  &  Faville.     March  Frontis- 

piece ...  .............  215,  218,  227 

Palace  of  Fine  Arts  ...............................  Bernard  Maybeck  ..........  202,  203 

Palace  of  Education  ..............................  Bliss  &  Faville  ...............  204,  205 

March  insert 
Court  of  Palms  ..................................  Geo.  W.  Kelham  ...........  206,  218 

Palace  of  Horticulture  .................  ..........  Bakewell   &   Brown.  .  .206,   223,  May 

.  colored  insert. 
Court  of  Four  Seasons  ...........................  Henry  Bacon  ...............  208,  209 

March  insert,  May  colored  insert. 
Festival  Hall   ....................................  Carrere  &  Hastings  .........  212,  224 

Court  of  the  Universe  ............................  McKim,  Mead  &  White.  .213,  214,  228 

Palaces  of  Food  Products,  Agriculture,  Transporta- 
tion and  Mines  and  Metallurgy  .................  Bliss  &  Faville  .................  216 

Court  of  Flowers   ...............................  Geo.  W.  Kelham  ............  218,  219 

Tower  of  Jewels  .................................  Carrere   &   Hastings  ............  218 

May  colored  insert. 
Court  of  Abundance  .............................  Louis   C.   Mullgardt  .........  221,  222 

Palace  of  Machinery  ..............................  Ward  &  Blohm  .................  226 

Arch  of  the  Rising  Sun  .......  ....................  .......................  March    insert 

California  Building  ......................................................  March   insert 

General-  Views  — 

Sketch   of  the   Exposition   Grounds  ...........................................  198,    199 

Sketch  of  the  construction  for  the  Central  Dome, 
Palace   of  Fine  Arts  ...........................................................  200 

Aeroplane    view  ...............................................................  •  •  •  201 

Sketch  of  the  Palace  of  Education.  .  .  .  ..............................  :  .........  204,   205 

Sketch  of  construction  around  the  Court  of  Palms  .................................  207 

Sketch  showing  'construction  of  the  Court  of  Four 
Seasons    .......................................................................  210 

Sketch  of  interior  construction  of  domes  .........................................  211 

Sketch     showing     framework     of     the     Court     of 
Abundance    ...................................  •  ................................  220 

Sketch  showing  interior  construction  of  Palace  of 
Machinery    ......................  .  ..............................................  225 

Panama-California  Exposition,   San  Diego,  Cal. 
Fine  Arts  Building  ...............................  Cram,  Goodhue  &  Ferguson.          230 

California  State  Building  ..........................  Cram,  Goodhue  &  Ferguson.  232,  ^ 

Varied  Industries  Building  ........................  Bertram   G.   Goodhue  ............  234 

Commerce  and  Industries  Building  ................  Bertram  G.  Goodhue.238,  246,  249,  250 

Southern  California  Counties  Building  ............  Bertram  G.  Goodhue  ............  241 

San  Joaquin  Valley  Building  .....................  Bertram  G.  Goodhue  ............  243 

Arts  and  Crafts  Building  .........................  Bertram  G.  Goodhue  ............  245 

New  Mexico  Building  .............................  RaPP  &ros.       ....  ..............  -£» 

Botanical   Building    .............................  Bertram  G.  Goodhue  ....... 

FARM   BUILDINGS  ...................................  Alfred   Hopkins    ............  341-35S 


F.  Mayer  &  Bros.,  Chicago  .................  Hill  &  Woltersdorf  ...........  471 

HISTORIC  BUILDINGS  AND  MONUMENTS. 

Villa  Madama,  Rome,  Italy  ................  ..  ....................................      m 

Baths  of  Caracalia,  Rome  ..........................................  .......... 


PAGE 

Colosseum,    Rome 428 

Parthenon  in  1755 430,   498,   500 

Tomb  on  Via  Latina,  Rome 431 

Theatre   of   Marcellus,   Rome 434 

Arch   of   Titus,   Rome 435 

British    Museum,    London 494 

Temple   of   Venus,    Pompeii 496 

Arch  of   Constantine,  Rome 504 

"Maison  Carree,"   Nimes,   France 506 

Roman   Amphitheatre.   Nimcs.   France 508 

Temple  of  Jupiter,  Baalbek,  Syria 513 

HOTELS,  RESTAURANTS,  ETC. 

Assembly  Tea  Rooms,  Boston Chas.    M.    Baker 83  -87 

Hotel  Statler,  Detroit,  Mich Geo.  B.  Post  &  Son 320-339 

HOSPITALS,  ETC. 

General  Hospital,  Cincinnati,  O Samuel  Hannaford  &  Sons. .  .454-482 

Evans  Museum  and  Dental  Institute,  University  of 

Pennsylvania,  Philadelphia John  T.  Windrim 516-527 

Forsyth  Dental  Clinic  for  Children,  Huston Edw.  T.  P.  Graham 528-533 

MUNICIPAL  BUILDINGS. 

Post  Office,  Washington,  D.  C Graham.  Burnham  &  Co 278-280 

Old  City  Hall,  Washington,  D.  C 268-273 

OFFICE  BUILDINGS. 

(See  Commercial  Buildings). 
SCHOOLS  AND  ACADEMIC  BUILDINGS. 

Washington  University,  St.  Louis,  Mo Cope  &  Stewardson 64  -75 

University  Hall 64     65 

Busch  Hall '.' '.'. . .'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'. . .'     67 

Cupples  Hall,  No.  2 68 

Tower  Dormitory 68 

Ridgley   Library .- 69 

Eads  Hall 69 

Cupples  Hall,  No.  1 75 

Francis  W.  Parker  School,  San  Diego.  Cal Win.  Templeton  Johnson 88  -90 

Johns  Hopkins  University,  Baltimore,  Md 481-492 

Academic   Building    Parker,  Thomas  &  Rice.  484,  485,  488 

Botanical  Laboratory 487 

Geological    Laboratory    Cook  &  Welch   490 

Physical  Laboratory   Wyatt  &  Nolting 490 

Chemical  Laboratory Carrere   &    Hastings 491 

Mechanical  and  Electrical  Engineering  Building. .  J.   E.   Sperry    492 

STABLE. 

Oscar  F.  Mayer  &  Bros.,  Chicago Hill  &  Woltersdorf 471 

STUDIO. 

Tree  Studios,  Annex Hill  &  Woltersdorf 473 

VARIED  TYPES  OF  BUILDINGS. 

John  C.  Proctor  Recreation  Center,  Peoria,  111 Hewitt  &  Emerson 116-131 

Montreal  Art  Gallery,  Montreal,  Can E.  &  W.  S.  Maxwell 132-148 

Tea  House Duhring,  Okie  &  Ziegler 310 

Bath    House    Otis  &  Clark 398 

ILLUSTRATIONS  OF  DETAIL 

ALTARS    265 

ARCADES    '246 

ARCHES    46,  435 

BALUSTRADES    100,  465 

CEILINGS — 

Beamed 11,  147,  263,  326,  373,  523 

Coffered 100,    105,  151 

'  Paneled 26,  30  et  seq.,  334 

Vaulted 32  et  seq.,  123,  221,  230,  264,  290,  296,  321 

CHANCELS 262,  418.  419,  421 

CHOIR  STALLS 291 

COLONADES 131,   134,   143,  270 

CONFESSIONALS    291 

CORNICES 41,  172,  387 

COURTS    117 

DOMES    26,    31 

DOORS   (Interior) 5,  61,  83,  February  frontispiece,  142 

DOORWAYS  (Exterior)  — 

Georgian. . .  January  cover,  13.  15.  17.  19,  23,  48,  57.  84,  92,  159,  167,  173,  176,  272.  325, 

340.  362,  366,  368,  378,  May  cover,  402,  445,  446,  448,  452,  549 


PAGE 

"  Gothic 64,  72,  75,  252,  257,  259,  519 

Renaissance,  French 136,  139,  March  frontispiece,  215,  216 

Renaissance,  Italian 213,  228 

Renaissance,  Spanish 231,  235,  239,  240,  405 

Modern  Classic 16,  118,  206,  208,  279,  528 

DOVE  COTES    311 

EXEDRAS 34,   36,    37 

FANLIGHTS 40,  173 

FONTS    390 

FORECOURTS    270 

FOUNTAINS 82,    85,    277,  312 

GAZEBOS 306,  307 

GARDENS April  cover,  -317,  319,  398,  464 

GRILLES  (Bronze  and  Iron) 110,  137,  146,  147 

INTERIORS— 

Auditoriums 123 

Ball    Rooms    331 

Banking  Rooms  - 100,  101,  104,  105,  110,  112,  113 

Banquet  Rooms , 332,  333 

Bedrooms    ' 64,    180 

Cafe 326 

Class  Rooms    (Open  Air) 90 

Council .  Rooms 147 

Dining  Rooms    60,  84,   182,   186,  329,  334,  400,  407 

Drawing  Rooms   184,  388 

Ecclesiastical 262,  263,  264,  290.  291,  417,  418,  419,  420,  421,  422,  423,  424 

Entrance  Halls  6,  7,  56,  141,  178,  183,  399 

Galleries   4,  9,   133,   142,   144,  230 

Gymnasiums    128,    130 

Kitchens    462 

Libraries 147,   177,   335 

Living  Rooms January  frontispiece,  4,  5,  '•>.  11,  21,  58,  59,  375,  407 

Lobbies   320,  321,  328,  524 

Music  Rooms    181 

Operating   Rooms 459,   460,    525 

Parlors 12,  162,  171,  335,  338 

Private  Offices    115 

Reading  Rooms    488 

Reception   Rooms 179 

Sitting   Rooms    185 

Stairways   . . . . . 5,  56.  170,  186.  520,  523 

Tea    Room    84,  85,  86 

Vestibules 83 

Waiting  Rooms 87 

Wards    (Hospital)    

LAMP  STANDARDS  140 

LATTICES  (Exterior)   : 52,  76,  348,  352,  357 

LOGGIAS... 29,    116,    125,    130,   312 

MANTLEPIECES — 

Modern  January  frontispiece,   177,   180,  182,   185.  186 

Georgian'.'.'.'. . 8,  12,  21,  58,  60,  62.  87.  160.  164.  171.  338,  388 

Renaissance,   English 71,   115,   178,   179 

Renaissance,  French '.181,  184,  400 

Colonial    373 

MARQUISE ••••  325 

NAKTHFX  263,  264 

NAVE  . :?;.'.:;..' '.v.v.v.v/.v.v.v.v. ......... . .- 417, 419, 420, 422 

NEWELL  AND  HANDRAILS 146,  1 

NlCHES  

PANELING Colored    insert    May   issue,    532,    534 

PATIOS   $29 

PENDENTTVES  

PERGOLAS '.' April  frontispiece,  301,  303,  305,  306,  307.  312 

Po^s™*5    ;"  "  •  -309,'  310,'  314,  '396 

PORCHES  "  48,  76.  340,  360,  394,  402,  447 

PORTICO   .'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'-'.'.'.' June  frontispiece 

PULPIT ' f£ 

ROOF  GARDEN 7?2 

ROTUNDA    • ' '   i  JQ 

SCREENS  «. r  ™ 

SHRINES    :.'• J 


PAGE 

SWIMMING  POOLS    129,   130 

TERRACES   April  frontispiece,  311,  391,  396 

TOWERS 64,  255,  292,  June  frontispiece,  484,  485,  516 

TRANSEPT    423 

URN   300 

WELL 309 

WINDOWS — 

Range    ' 11 

Mullioned     25 

Traceried .27,  418,  423 

Bay  81 

Georgian   82,  324,  450,  451 

Spanish  Renaissance 237 

WOOD  CARVING  537 

ARCHITECTS  REPRESENTED 
NAME  HOME  OFFICE  PAGE 

Bacon,    Henry New  York  City 208-209 

Baker,   Chas.  M Boston,  Mass.   . . : 83-87 

Baker,  Louis  Carter,  Jr Philadelphia,   Pa 370-373 

Bakewell  &  Brown San  Francisco,  Cal 206, 223 

Bessell,   Wesley  Sherwood New  York  City 360,  362-369 

Bliss  &  Favillc San  Francisco,  Cal.  . . .  193,  204-205,  210,  211,  215-217,  218 

Borie,  C.  L Philadelphia,  Pa 16 

Caldwell,  Francis  D Philadelphia,   Pa 14, 15 

Carrere  &  Hastings New  York  City 212, 218 

Chard,    Thornton New  York  City 177-186 

Cook,  Walter,  &  Winthrop  A.  Welch.  New  York  City 491 

Cope  &   Stewardson St.  Louis,  Mo 64  69,    71-73 

Corbett,  B.   Cooper Los  Angeles,  Cal 464-469 

Corbusier,  J.  W.  C Cleveland,  0 252,  254-267 

Corse,  Henry  T.,  Jr New  York  City 479 

Cram,  Goodhue  &  Ferguson Boston,  Mass 229-233,  235-237,  242 

Cram    &    Ferguson Boston,  Mass 410,  412,  414,  424 

Duhring,  Okie  &  Ziegler Philadelphia,  Pa 76-81,  310 

Duhring  &  Howe Philadelphia,  Pa 311 

Eckel  &  Aldrich St.  Joseph,  Mo 561 

Evans  &  Warner Philadelphia,  Pa May  Cover 

Farquhar,  Robert  David Los  Angeles,  Cal 224 

Fisher,  Richard  Arnold Boston,  Mass Opp.  1,  2,  4-13,  18 

Goodhue,   Bertram  G New  York  City 234,  238,  241,  243,  244,  247,  249,  250 

Graham,  Edw.  T.  P Boston,  Mass 528-534 

Graham,  Burnham  &  Co Chicago,  111 278, 280 

Hannaf ord,  Samuel,  &  Sons Cincinnati,  0 454,  456,  462 

Heacock  &  Hokanson Philadelphia,   Pa 274-276 

Hewitt  &  Emerson Peoria,  111 116  130 

Hill  &  Woltersdorf Chicago,  111 470-473 

Hopkins,  Alfred New  York  City 340-359 

Johnson,   Wm.   Templeton San  Diego,  Cal 88-90 

Kelham,  George  W San  Francisco,  Cal 207,  218,  219 

Kimball   &   Roosa New  York  City 98,  100-101 

Litchfield,  Electus  D New  York  City 48-53,    55-62 

McKim,  Mead  &  White New  York  City 213-214, 228 

Maxwell,  E.  &  W.  S Montreal,  Can 132-147 

Maybeck,   Bernard San  Francisco,  Cal 200.  202  203 

Mellor  &  Meigs Philadelphia,  Pa 25,  374,  375 

Moore,  John  C White  Plains,  N.  Y 277 

Mulleardt,  Louis  C San  Francisco,  Cal 220-222 

Olmsted  Bros Brookline,  Mass 289,  301,  305-307,  309,  313,  315 

Otis"&  Clark Chicago,  111 Frontispiece,  386-408 

Parker,  Thomas  &  Rice Baltimore,  Md.  June  Frontispiece,  484,  485,  486,  487,  488 

Platt,  Charles  A New  York  City 303 

Post,  Geo.  B.,  &  Sons New  York  City 320-321,  323-338 

Rapp  Bros Trinidad,   Col .» 

Roth  &  Study St.  Louis,  Mo • 576-578 

Rowe  &  Smith New  York  City 91-92 

Sperry,  J.  E Baltimore,  Md 492 

Trowbridge  &  Livingston New  York  City Opp.  97,  111-115 

Ward  &  Blohm San  Francisco,  Cal 226 

Windrim,  John  T Philadelphia,  Pa 516-527 

Wyatt  &  Nolting Baltimore,  Md 491 

York  &  Sawyer New  York  City 103  110 


CHITECTVRA, 
RECORD 

January    i  9  1 5 


Published  by  The  Architectural  Record  C?  ~  New  York. 


Buildinr 


Made  from  Long,  Tough  Root  Fiber 


The  inevitable  time 
has  arrived  when  an  improve- 
ment in  wall  boards  is  ex- 
pected. The  demand  is  for  a 
board  whose  range  of  useful- 
ness and  inherent  qualities 
surpass  all  others. 

This  demand  has  been 
met. 

FIRERLIC  BUILD- 
ING BOARD  owes  many  of 
its  advantages  over  ordinary 
ground  wood  or  paper  pulp 
boards  to  the  unique  and  ex- 
clusively controlled  material 
which  is  its  base. 

From  a  long,  tough 
fib^red  root  imported  from 
Turkish  Arabia,  there  is 
formed  under  pressure,  a 
strong,  homogeneous,  natural- 
ly reinforced  mass  of  closely 
interlaced  fibers,  which  gives 
FIBERLIC,  a  uniform,  rigid 
and  tenacious  texture,  impos- 
sible in  any  board  less  care- 


fully   planned    and    manufac- 
tured. 

Chemically  deprived 
of  its  wood  properties,  FI- 
BERLIC is  difficult  to  ignite, 
is  a  better  insulator  against 
heat,  cold,  sound  and  vibration, 
and  absolutely  excludes  mould 
growth  and  insect  life  which 
flourish  in  ordinary  wood  com- 
position. 

FIBERLIC  is  made 
in  eighth,  quarter  and  half- 
inch  thickness,  an  advantage 
immediately  apparent  when 
unusual  requirements  exclude 
the  consideration  of  light 
weight  board. 

The  complete  story  of 
FIBERLIC  is  interesting  from 
purely  an  educational  stand- 
point, aside  from  establishing 
a  newer  a'nd  better  method  of 
constructing  walls  and  ceil- 
ings. 


We  shall  be  pleased  to  answer  fully  and  technically  any  questions.      Send  for  sample 

The  Fiberlic  Company 


Camel  en 


New  Jersey 


VOL.  XXXVII.    No.  I 


JANUARY,  1915 


SERIAL  NO.   196 


ARCH1TECTVRAL 
RECORD 


COVER — South  Entrance  of  Independence  Hall,  Philadelphia. 
Drawing  by  Jack  Manley  Rose 


Page 


THE  ARCHITECTURAL  RECLAMATION  OF  SMALL  AREAS    IN  CITIES      1 
By  Harold  D.  Eberlein 


THE  VILLA  MADAMA.    Part  II 

Text  and  Measured  Drawings  by  Howard  W.  Germann 


26 


AN  ARCHITECT'S    COUNTRY   HOUSE:    Residence  of  Electus  Litchfield,  Esq., 

New  Canaan,  Conn.  -  -  -     48 

By  Harriet  T.  Bottomley 

WASHINGTON  UNIVERSITY,  St.  Louis,  Mo.     Cope  &  Stewardson,  Architects    *     64 
By  Guy  Study 

A  MODERN   VERSION    OF  THE  EARLY  PENNSYLVANIA   COUNTRY 

HOUSE :    Residence  of  William  T.  Harris,  Esq.,  Villa  Nova,  Pa.       Duhring, 
Okie  &  Ziegler,  Architects     -  -     76 

By  C.  Matlack  Price 


PORTFOLIO  OF  CURRENT  ARCHITECTURE 


82 


THE  ARCHITECT'S  LIBRARY:  Books  by  Practical  Theorist— Gram  and  Blashfield     93 
By  Richard  Franz  Bach 

NOTES  AND  COMMENTS 96 


Editor:  MICHAEL  A.  MIKKELSEN.  Contributing  Editor :   HERBERT D.  CROLY 

Advertising  Manager:   AUSTIN  L.  BLACK 
Yearly  Subscription— United  States  $3.00  Entered  May  22.    1902.   as  Second  Copyright    1914  by  The  Architectural 


— Foreign  $4.00 — Single  Copies  35  cents 


Class    Matter,  at  New  York.    N.  Y. 


Record  Company — All  Righto  Reserved 


PUBLISHED    MONTHLY    BY 

THE  ARCHITECTURAL  RECORD  COMPANY 


115-119  WEST  FORTIETH  STREET.  NEW  YORK 


F.   W.    DODGE,   President 


F.   T.   MILLER,   Secretary  and  Treasurer 


LIVING-ROOM—OWN  HOUSE  IN 
LIME  STREET,  BOSTON.  RICHARD 
ARNOLD  FISHER,  ARCHITECT. 


THE  . 

ARCHITECTVRAL 
RECORD 


JANVARY,  1915 


VOLVME  XXXVII 


NVMBER  I 


S2?  ARCH1TECTVRAL  RECLAMATION 
OF  SMALL  AREAS  IN  CITIES 

By  Harold    D.  Eberlem 


MAKING  the  most  of  all  available 
space  in  our  cities  is  a  matter 
of  serious  import.  Indeed,  in 
many  cases,  it  is  more  than  a  matter 
of  serious  import;  it  is  a  matter,  rather, 
of  imperative  necessity.  The  necessity 
is  occasioned  and  emphasized  by  the 
growing  congestion  -of  population,  a 
population  that  is  increasing  by  leaps 
and  bounds,  and  by  the  consequent 
sharp  advance  in 'real  estate  values.  Itr 
not  a  few  instances  the  problem  of  mak- 
ing each  square  foot  of  space  render 
its  utmost  service  and  bring  in  the 
largest  possible  financial  return  has  be- 
come intensely  acute.  The  architectural 
reclamation  of  neighborhoods  or  parts 
of  neighborhoods  whose  possibilities 
have  hitherto  been  ignored,  offers  one 
valuable  means  of  relieving  the  strain. 
The  pressure  is  felt  in  business  and 


4-o 


residential  districts  alike.  In  the  busi- 
ness world,  motives  of  convenience  and 
the  stress  of  competition  dictate  a  com- 
paratively restricted  area  of  activity  as 
the  eligible  location  for  those  whose 
commercial  or  professional  success  de- 
pends largely  upon  ease  and  dispatch 
of  communication  and  personal  contact 
with  their  customers,  clients  or  asso- 
ciates. Modern  transit  facilities  have 
made  it  possible  to  realize  this  tendency 
to  rush  to  one  focal  point  and,  as  a  neces- 
sary result,  the  skyscraper  has  been 
evolved  to  relieve  the  situation  in  some 
degree. 

On  the  other  hand — and  here  lies  our 
present  concern — in  urban  residential 
districts  the  pressure  has  been  present 
for  some  time  past,  is  steadily  becoming 
more  and  more  insistent  and  refuses  to 
be  satisfied  with  the  apartment  house  or 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


flat  as  the  only  practicable  solution  of 
the  difficulty.  While  highly  organized 
methods  of  transportation  have  greatly 
fostered  city  growth  and  assured  ease 
of  communication  between  the  various 
sections,  the  fact  remains  that  certain 
centrally  located  neighborhoods  are 
deemed  particularly  desirable  for  pur- 
poses of  residence,  whether  from  consid- 
erations of  convenience,  of  personal 
preference  or,  perhaps,  from  sentimen- 
tal attachment.  Concurrently  with  the 
well  recognized  "back  to  the  country" 
movement,  there  is  also  a  movement  in 
the  opposite  direction  that  sometimes  es- 
capes notice,  a  "back  to  the  centre  of 
the  city"  movement  that  leads  people  to 
seek  dwelling  places  now  where  a  few 
years  ago  they  would  not  have  thought 
for  a  moment  of  looking.  Apartments 
and  flats  are  not  to  their  taste  and  yet, 
oftentimes,  their  means  are  not  sufficient 
to  warrant  the  purchase  or  upkeep  of  a 
large  house  on  one  of  the  fashionable 
residential  streets.  Consequently  they 
must  needs  turn  their  attention  to  the  in- 
tensive use  of  space  and  look  to  the  archi- 
tectural reclamation  of  the  unimproved 
areas  in  small  back  streets  for  the  one 
feasible  and  satisfactorv  solution  of  the 
problem  that  confronts  them.  Thus,  by 
turning  to  good  account  the  areal  by- 
product of  an  older  and  more  prodigal 
method  of  city  building  when,  as  yet, 
there  was  no  perplexing  congestion  ana 
hence  no  particular  need  to  economize 
ground  room,  they  both  enhance  the  de- 
sirability and  value  of  property  and  ac- 
complish their  wishes  in  the  matter  of 
location. 

Others  who  are  thoroughly  interested 
in  this  process  of  architectural  reclama- 
tion are  those  in  easy  but  not  affluent 
circumstances  who  orefer  to  live  in  a 
comfortable  but  modest  way  in  the  heart 
of  the  city,  where  all  things  in  which 
they  are  interested,  whether  pertaining 
to  business  or  pleasure,  are  readily  ac- 
cessible by  a  few  minutes'  walk,  rather 
than  have  a  more  extensive  establish- 
ment in  the  suburbs  or  country  where 
residence,  however  agreeable,  entails 
spending  daily  a  considerable  time  in  go- 
ing back  and  forth.  Yet  others,  of  ample 
means,  maintain  country  places  where 


they  live  during  the  greater  part  of  the 
year  and  do  most  of  their  entertaining 
but  choose  to  live  in  the  city  during  the 
winter  and  early  spring  and  do  not  care 
to  keep  up  large  and  expensive  houses 
which  it  suits  them  to  occupy  during 
only  a  limited  period.  When  they  are 
in  the  city  they  wish  to  be  in  the  midst 
of  it  where  the  social  life  centres.  All 
classes  are  thoroughly  representative  of 
the  "back  to  the  city"  movement. 

Opportunities  for  the  felicitous  archi- 
tectural reclamation  of  modest  neighbor- 
hoods and  streets  are  plentiful  in  the 
older  and  larger  cities  of  our  Eastern 
and  Middle  states.  Boston,  New  York, 
Philadelphia  and  Baltimore  are  full  of 
"backwaters"  from  the  constant  stream 
of  traffic  that  surges  through  the  main 
thoroughfares.  Thousands  of  people 
pass  within  a  stone's  throw  of  them 
every  day  without  being  aware  of  their 
existence  merely  because  they  happen 
to  be  a  few  paces  out  of  the  beaten  track. 
Those  who  are  wise  enough  to  search 
them  out  and  make  their  homes  there 
enjoy  a  rare  measure  of  privacy  and 
yet,  at  the  same  time,  are  in  the  very 
heart  of  all  urban  activity.  In  their 
unimproved  state  these  places,  it  is  true, 
are  often  far  from  prepossessing.  The 
sites  of  potential  development  may  be 
occupied  by  stables,  blacksmith  shops 
or  tiny  dilapidated  houses  of  the  most 
flimsy  and  tumbledown  character  or  there 
may  be  small  dwellings,  old  but  struc- 
turally sound,  that  need  only  judicious 
remodelling,  and  sometimes  but  little  of 
it,  to  render  them  thoroughly  habitable, 
comfortable  and  highly  attractive.  In 
either  case,  whether  architectural  recla- 
mation involves  building  anew  or  only 
a  degree  of  alteration  and  re-adjust- 
ment, it  requires  but  the  power  to  visual- 
ize, coupled  with  ordinary  sound  real  es- 
tate judgment,  to  be  able  to  appreciate 
the  waiting  opportunities.  While  many 
possibilities  in  this  direction  have  been 
eagerly  seized  upon  and  made  the  most 
of  in  the  cities  mentioned,  it  is  safe  to 
say  that  the  field  open  for  this  sort  of 
improvement  has  been  scarcely  more 
than  entered  upon. 

In  support  of  this  statement  may  be 
cited  the  facts  as  they  appear,  both  in 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


LIVING   ROOM    AND   GALLERY— OWN    HOUSE,    LIME   STREET,    BOSTON. 
Richard    Arnold    Fisher,    Architect. 


ithe  shape  of  actual  achievements  in 
•  architectural  reclamation  and  in  the 
[physical  possibility  that  invites  improve- 
ment. In  every  American  city  whose 
;age  has  passed  the  century  mark  there 
may  be  discovered  attaching  to  certain 
favored  localities  a  distinctive  atmos- 
phere, subtle  to  be  sure,  and  well-nigh 
ibaffling  of  analysis,  but  strongly  individ- 
ual, nevertheless,  and  not  to  be  ignored 
as  a  negligible  influence.  Beacon  Hill 
in  Boston  has  such  an  atmosphere  of  its 
own  and  has  it  to  a  marked  degree.  It 
is  altogether  too  elusive  to  define  in 
.terms  of  logical  exactitude,  but  anyone 
'who  has  spent  much  time  in  Boston  can- 
mot  but  be  conscious  of  it,  especially 
while  passing  along  Mount  Vernon 
^street  or  through  Louisburg  Square. 

Boston  people  have  felt  this  mysteri- 
•ous  force  attracting  them  and  there  has 
been  a  noticeable  movement  back  to  that 
district  on  the  part  of  those  who  prefer 
.to  live  there  in  modest  elegance  rather 


than  in  ampler  surroundings  in  a  local- 
ity which  the  casual  observer,  unaware 
of  Beacon  Hill's  pervasive  charm,  might 
deem  physically  more  attractive.  Quite 
apart,  however,  from  this  indefinable  but 
potent  allurement,  Beacon  Hill  has  very 
material  advantages  to  offer  in  its  quiet 
and  privacy  in  the  heart  of  the  city,  along 
with  ready  accessibility  to  all  business  and 
social  activities  and  in  its  proximity  to  the 
Common,  the  Public  Gardens  and  the 
Esplanade.  It  only  remains  to  find 
eligible  sites  for  architectural  improve- 
ment, and  these  are  not  wanting  in  the 
many  small  streets  that  the  oversight 
of  a  former  generation  passed  by  in  a 
period  of  rapid  expansion  to  the  west 
along  Beacon  street,  Commonwealth 
avenue,  Marlborough  street  and  other 
streets  in  that  neighborhood.  What  has 
actually  been  accomplished  in  the  way 
of  rendering  the  small  streets  of  Beacon 
Hill  attractive  for  residential  purposes 
we  shall  see  in  following  paragraphs. 


DETAIL  OF  LIVING  ROOM  AND  STAIR- 
OWN  HOUSE,  LIME  STREET,  BOSTON. 
RICHARD  ARNOLD  FISHER,  ARCHITECT. 


HALLWAY  FROM  DINING-ROOM  TO  STAIRS 
—OWN  HOUSE  IN  LIME  STREET,  BOSTON. 
RICHARD  ARNOLD  FISHER,  ARCHITECT. 


LIVING -ROOM-OWN  HOUSE  IN 
LIME  STREET,  BOSTON.  RICHARD 
ARNOLD  FISHER,  ARCHITECT. 


10 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


The  beginning  already  made  has  many 
useful  lessons  to  teach  and  augurs  well 
for  the  future  of  architectural  and  eco- 
nomic development  upon  the  lines 
marked  out. 

Alluding  once  more  to  the  influence 
of  a  sentimental  attachment  or  of  a 
characteristic  local  atmosphere  and 
charm  in  directing  attention  to  the  re- 
clamation of  neighborhoods  and  streets 
that  the  march  of  improvement  and  ex- 
pansion has  swept  past  and  left  un- 
touched, we  turn  to  examine  Philadel- 
phia's opportunities  for  architectural 
renewal  of  unproductive  or  decadent 
areas.  Architectural  phenomena  often 
find  their  ultimate  explanation  in  social 
or  economic  conditions  and  in  the  pres- 
ent instance  a  slight  digression  is  neces- 
sary to  show  why  the  strong  desire  to 
live  within  a  certain  area  has  started  a 
train  of  remodelling  and  made  architec- 
tural reclamation  the  object  of  serious 
effort. 


TYPICAL  FLOOR   PLAN   IN   BRIMMER   STREET 

HOUSES. 
Richard  Arnold  Fisher,  Architect. 


No  one  of  Philadelphia's  many  foibles 
and  traditionary  prejudices  causes  more 
amusement  or  perplexitv  in  the  minds  of 
non-Philadelphians  than  the  generally 
accepted  convention  that  one  must  live 
south  of  Market  street  in  order  to  be 
an  fait  socially  or  even  respectable.  No 
end  of  fun  has  been  poked  at  Philadel- 
phia on  this  score.  The  fact,  however, 
remains;  the  feeling  does  exist  and  it 
would  be  an  easy  matter  to  pick  out  a 
number  of  instances  in  which  nouveau 
riche  families,  hailing  from  north  of  the 
mystic  line  drawn  along  the  middle  of 
Market  street,  have  sought  a  place  of 
abode  on  Walnut,  Locust  or  Spruce 
streets  or  on  one  of  the  eligible  cross 
streets  in  their  vicinity  as  a  first  step 
toward  winning  a  quasi-recognition  in 
polite  society.  In  the  early  days  it  was 
not  so  and  it  would  not  be  difficult  even 
now  to  find  on  the  taboo  north  side 
plenty  of  estimable  people  of  impeccable 
birth  and  breeding  whom  the  veriest 
snob  would  kow-tow  to  did  he  know 
their  family  antecedents,  while  Arch 
street,  well  within  the  memory  of  the 
present  generation,  was  still  a  strong- 
hold of  the  old  Quaker  element. 

One  can  readily  see  why  the  coming 
of  the  elevated  railroad  and  manufac- 
turing establishments  made  a  difference 
in  some  districts,  but  others  that  are 
physically  acceptable  languish  under  the 
blight  of  social  ineligibility,  while  places 
of  less  outward  attraction  are  eagerly 
sought  for  the  distinction  that  residence 
in  them  is  supposed  to  confer.  One  can 
also  readily  see  why  the  really  old  sec- 
tion of  the  city,  with  its  many  remaining 
landmarks  and  characteristics  of  Geor- 
gian date,  should  exert  a  powerful 
charm,  but  to  understand  what  must  to 
some  seem  merely  a  caprice  of  snobbery 
one  must  know  a  bit  of  history,  know 
that  many  years  ago  it  so  chanced  that 
the  lower  ends  of  Chestnut,  Walnut, 
Spruce  and  Pine  streets  with  the  inter- 
secting cross  streets  in  the  vicinity  con- 
stituted what  may  be  termed  the  "court 
end"  of  town,  that  the  course  of  residen- 
tial progress  lay  in  a  westward  line  as 
business  gradually  monopolized  the  east 
and,  finally,  that  in  Philadelphia  and 
Boston,  the  "two  English  cities  in 


SMALL     HOUSES     IN     MT.     VER 
NON  STREET,   BOSTON.     RICHARD 
ARNOLD       FISHER,       ARCHITECT. 


FRANKLIN  INN  CLUB  —  DEAN  AND 
ST.  JAMES'S  STREETS,  PHILADELPHIA, 
FRANCIS  D.  CALDWELL.  ARCHITECT. 


l< 


DOORWAY  DETAIL— FRANKLIN  INN 
CLUB,  PHILADELPHIA.  FRANCIS 
D.  CALDWELL,  ARCHITECT. 


From  a  water  color  sketch  by  Eugene  Castello. 


r 


MASK  AND  WIG  CLUB,  QUINCE 
STREET,  BELOW  SPRUCE,  PHILA- 
DELPHIA. C.  L.  BORIE,  ARCHITECT. 


POOR          RICHARD          CLUB   — 
DEAN  STREET,  PHILADELPHIA. 


5-o 


18 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


America"  as  Freeman  called  them,  a 
strong  residuary  leaven  of  British  con- 
servatism and  devotion  to  tradition  has 
always  largely  influenced  the  reckoning 
of  social  status  by  an  hereditary  stand- 
ard of  birth  and  breeding  rather  than  by 
the  fortuitous  standard  of  mere  wealth. 

One  may  pooh-pooh  this  influence  and 
this  explanation  if  one  pleases,  but  the 
proof  of  its  reality  and  power  is  to  be 
found  in  real  estate  values  in  that  sec- 
tion of  the  city  where  so  many  of  the 
descendants  of  those  who  used  to  live 
in  the  "court  end"  of  the  city  have  elect- 
ed to  have  their  present  place  of  abode. 
Thus  also  may  be  explained  the  ten- 
dency to  the  architectural  reclamation 
of  the  small  streets  in  that  favored 
neighborhood  and  therein  lies  the  inter- 
est for  us  and  the  connection  with  the 
subject  under  discussion  that  the  fore- 
going explanation  was  needed  to  eluci- 
date. Having  grasped  the  complex  na- 
ture of  the  motives  that  prompt  to  the 
architectural  regeneration  of  the  small 
streets  within  a  restricted  area,  it  re- 
mains to  note  the  present  condition  of 
those  streets,  what  opportunities  they 
offer  and  what  has  been  thus  far  accom- 
plished. 

According  to  William  Penn's  scheme 
the  city  was  laid  out  like  a  gridiron  with 
the  principal  thoroughfares  intersecting 
each  other  at  right  angles.  This  gridiron 
plan  was  still  further  cross-hatched  by 
numerous  small  streets  or  alleys  run- 
ning, also  at  right  angles,  between  the 
larger  streets.  While  there  was  still 
plenty  of  room  for  development  along 
the  principal  streets  these  small  back 
streets  were  given  over  to  stables  and 
the  dwellings  of  mechanics,  exceedingly 
simple  and  unpretentious,  but  soundly 
built  and  oftentimes  with  a  touch  of  that 
modest  architectural  elegance  that  re- 
mained as  a  heritage  from  the  Georgian 
builders. 

In  not  a  few  instances  these  little 
houses  have  fallen  into  the  hands  of  an 
extremely  undesirable  class  of  occu- 
pants and  occasionally  a  condition  of 
squalor  and  dilapidation  prevails  so  that 
their  presence  within  a  few  feet  of 
homes  of  wealth  and  refinement  is  alto- 
gether anomalous  even  though  the  occu- 


pants of  the  large  houses  turn  their 
backs  and  forget  the  existence  of  the 
lesser  homes  until  a  brawl  of  drunken 
negroes  or  some  similar  disturbance  at 
their  back  gates  unpleasantly  compels 
their  attention  for  a  moment.  The 
source  of  annoyance,  however,  contains 
the  germs  of  remedy  and  the  remedy 
has  begun  to  appear  in  a  process1  of 
architectural  reclamation  that  is  assum- 
ing such  proportions  that  we  cannot  af- 
ford to  overlook  its  record  and  the  fore- 
cast of  .future  development  that  it  sug- 
gests. 

Following  the  order  in  which  the  ac- 
companying illustrations  occur,  the 
reader  may  first  see  a  part  of  the  work 
of  reclamation  already  accomplished  in 
Boston  after  the  plans  of  Richard  Ar- 
nold Fisher,  architect.  The  houses  il- 
lustrated are  on  Lime  and  Brimmer 
streets  in  the  Beacon  Hill  section,  and 
were  erected  by  the  Brimmer  Street 
Trust  upon  ground  that  was  formerly 
occupied  by  stables,  small  blacksmith 


FIRST  AND  SECOND   FLOORS-OWN   HOUSE 
IN  LIME  STREET,   BOSTON. 
Richard    Arnold    Fisher,    Architect. 


TYPICAL  SMALL  HOUSE  — 
SMALL  STREET  IN  OLD  PART 
OF  CITY,  PHILADELPHIA. 


-20 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


shops  and  other  little  buildings  of  tum- 
bledown aspect  and  dilapidated  condi- 
tion. In  this  case  the  reclamation  had 
to  be  effected  entirely  by  demolition  and 
building  anew. 

The  problem  presented  was  interest- 
ing in  many  ways,  but  particularly  in  re- 
spect of  the  size  of  the  lots.  They  were 
originally  small  and  it  was  decided  to 
keep  them  so.  The  average  size  is 
eighteen  feet  by  sixty  feet.  Notwith- 
standing this  limitation  excellent  results 
have  been  gained.  Regarded  from  the 
exterior,  the  houses  in  both  Lime  and 
Brimmer  streets  present  a  reassuring 
dignity  of  mien  that  dispels  any  appre- 
hensive uncertainty  as  to  the  possibility 
of  making  the  small  house  an  architec- 
tural factor  of  importance  and  interest. 
Studied  from  within,  they  show  praise- 
worthy ingenuity  in  getting  a  great  deal 
of  space  within  a  very  small  compass. 
As  may  be  imagined,  there  is  no  allow- 
ance for  waste  room. 

Although  the  frontage  of  the  block  of 
houses  on  Brimmer  street  is  treated  as 
practically  one  architectural  unit,  there 
is  enough  individuality  in  the  treatment 
of  the  several  houses  to  preclude  the 
charge  of  monotony.  Furthermore, 
considered  together,  their  number  sup- 
plies a  cumulative  force  and  they  acquire 
the  effect  of  a  large  building.  The  mode 
of  architectural  expression  chosen  is 
quite  in  keeping,  through  its  late  Geor- 
gian characteristics,  with  the  rest  of  the 
larger  houses  in  the  surrounding  district 
which  nearly  all  show  unmistakable 
traces  of  Bulfinch  influence  or  the  marks 
of  a  slightly  earlier  period.  No  start- 
ling or  flighty  effects  have  been  attempt- 
ed and  the  whole  row  is  instinct  with  an 
air  of  well-mannered  sanity  and  sub- 
stantial comfort.  Before  passing  on  to 
other  points,  one  cannot  fail  to  note  with 
pleasure  several  agreeable  touches  of  in- 
terest that  have  been  added  in  the  shape 
of  the  iron  area  and  step  railings  and 
the  balustered  piercings  of  the  brick 
coping  on  the  two  projecting  end  houses. 
This  same  coping  is  reminiscent  of  the 
British  method  of  employing  such  a  de- 
vice to  screen  dormer  windows  and  the 
slope  of  the  roof  from  view  and  present 
a  finished  front  to  the  street. 


With  the  Lime  street  houses,  just 
around  the  corner  from  those  in  Brim- 
mer street,  there  was  the  same  limitation 
in  the  size  of  the  lots,  all  of  which  are 
small.  In  this  connection  the  archi- 
tect's own  house  is  particularly  signifi- 
cant, as  Mr.  Fisher  designed  it  largely 
"as  an  object  lesson  to  show  how  a 
house  can  be  spacious  in  fact  as  well  as 
in  appearance  on  a  very  small  lot." 

Upon  examining  carefully  the  floor 
plans  and  the  illustrations,  the  reader 
will  see  how  admirably  Mr.  Fisher  has 
succeeded  in  proving  this  thesis.  There 
is  nothing  cramped  in  the  appearance 
of  the  exterior  and  within  there  is  such 
an  agreeable  atmosphere  of  both  breadth 
and  height  that  no  one  would  fancy  the 
architect  had  been  hampered  by  the 
strait  bounds  of  the  property  lines.  The 
house  shows  conclusively  that  dignity 
and  spaciousness  are  not  matters  neces- 
sarily of  size.  Most  of  those  who  read 
this  can  no  doubt  recall  upon  a  moment's 
reflection,  little  rooms  they  have  seen 
that  seem  large  and  full  of  dignity  and, 
on  the  other  hand,  large  rooms  that 
seem  small.  If  they  analyze  their  im- 
pressions they  will  see  how  all-important 
is  the  consideration  of  relative  scale  and 
proportions.  Mr.  Fisher  has  so  man- 
aged his  proportions  and  detail  that  all 
contribute  to  the  effect  of  spaciousness. 
He  has  achieved  his  purpose  with  re- 
straint and  without  apparent  effort  and 
is  thereby  entitled  to  all  the  more  credit 
in  coping  with  a  difficult  problem  where 
any  evidence  of  palpable  striving  for  ef- 
fect or  any  resort  to  "stunty"  expedients 
would  have  been  fatal  to  the  result. 

Besides  showing  that  dignity  and 
space  are  both  attainable  in  a  small  city 
house,  Mr.  Fisher  has  adroitly  contrived 
his  rooms  so  that  they  furnish  well  and 
thereby  contribute  to  the  general  impres- 
sion of  amplitude.  Free,  unbroken 
wall  spaces  help  greatly  in  this  respect, 
while  the  large  mullioned  window  at  the 
end  of  the  living-room,  consistent  with 
the  seventeenth  century  English  archi- 
tecture of  the  rest  of  the  house,  admits 
a  flood  of  light  and  emphasizes  the  prin- 
ciple, which  we  in  America  are  too  apt 
to  ignore,  of  admitting  an  abundance  of 
uncurtained  light  at  one  place.  Inci- 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


21 


LIVING  ROOM— TYPICAL  OLD  SMALL  HOUSE,  PHILADELPHIA. 


MANTEL   DETAIL-TYPICAL   OLD   SMALL   HOUSE,   PHILADELPHIA. 


22 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


dentally,  it  may  be  added  that  having 
secured  favorable  conditions  for  effec- 
tive furnishing,  Mr.  Fisher  has  shown 
excellent  judgment  in  the  choice  'and  ar- 
rangement of  his  furniture  in  keeping 
with  the  architectural  character  of  its 
setting. 

Another  point  to  be  borne  in  mind  in 
connection  with  small  houses  of  the  type 
under  consideration  is  that  it  is  better 
to  have  a  few  rooms,  well  proportioned 
and  of  good  dimensions,  rather  than  a 
larger  number  of  less  effective  rooms 
some  of  which  are  not  used  to  the  full 
extent  that  they  might  be.  With  fewer 
rooms,  carefully  planned  to  meet  all  do- 
mestic needs,  it  is  possible  to  use  fully 
every  available  inch  of  space,  as  must  be 
the  case  if  the  small,  compact  house  is 
to  be  a  thorough  success.  Many  of  the 
best  houses  of  our  own  Colonial  period, 
and  large  houses  at  that,  had  compara- 
tively few  rooms,  far  fewer  than  would 
have  been  the  case  in  most  houses  of 
equal  size  designed  today,  but  our  fore- 
bears found  it  not  inconvenient  and 
managed  to  observe  with  ease  all  the 
amenities  of  polite  social  life  and  we  can 
readily  accommodate  our  manner  of  liv- 
ing to  the  same  conditions. 

The  two  small  houses  in  Mt.  Vernon 
street  whose  exteriors  are  shown  in  one 
of  the  illustrations,  also  designed  by  Mr. 
Fisher,  are  full  of  interest  and  sugges- 
tivcness  for  the  treatment  of  such  prob- 
lems. They  are  almost  severely  plain 
and  unpretentious,  but  several  pleasing 
and  effective  touches,  compatible  with 
their  studied  simplicity,  have  been  add- 
ed in  the  form  of  semi-circular  balconies 
with  plain  iron  railings  before  the  tall 
second  floor  windows,  the  recessed  bays 
in  which  the  windows  are  set  and  the 
stone  string  course  crossing  the  brick 
wall  at  the  spring  of  the  bay  arches.  On 
comparing  them,  however,  with  the 
tilock  of  houses  at  the  corner  of  Lime 
and  Brimmer  streets,  one  cannot  help 
feeling  how  much  more  satisfactory  it 
is  to  deal  with  a  reclamation  project  of 
some  extent  rather  than  with  scattered 
cases.  It  is  often  urged  that  it  is  scarce- 
ly worth  while,  from  a  financial  point  of 
view,  for  a  busy  architect  to  bother  with 
small  houses.  In  isolated  cases  this 


may  or  may  not  be  true,  but  that  objec- 
tion cannot  validly  be  made  where  the 
operation  covers  a  considerable  extent 
of  ground  and  the  architect's  fee  is  not 
a  picayune  affair.  Furthermore,  such 
an  operation  provides  a  favorable  oppor- 
tunity for  constructive  handling  that  is 
impossible  where  there  is  only  a  very 
small  frontage  to  work  upon.  With 
reference  to  the  cost  of  the  houses  in 
Lime  and  Brimmer  streets,  it  is  not  per- 
mitted to  state  the  exact  figures  but  only 
to  say  that  the  outlay  involved  was  ex- 
tremely moderate,  altogether  commen- 
surate with  the  size  of  the  lots  and  quite 
within  the  reach  of  those  to  whom  resi- 
dence in  reclaimed  districts  offers  attrac- 
tions. 

Turning  now  to  examine  the  progress 
of  the  architectural  reclamation  of  the 
small  streets  in  Philadelphia,  we  find 
that  the  process  has  been  in  great  meas- 
ure sporadic.  One  of  the  few  streets 
that  has  shown  any  consistent  and  con- 
tinuous development  in  this  direction  is 
Dean  street,  or  Camac,  as  it  is  now 
called,  running  south  from  Walnut  ..be- 
tween Twelfth  and  Thirteenth  and,  in 
its  reclaimed  portion,  almost  wholly 
given  over  to  small  clubs.  There  are 
the  Business  and  Professional  Men's 
Club,  the  Franklin  Inn  Club  and  the 
Stragglers'  Club,  all  occupying  old  build- 
ings that  have  been  more  or  less  remod- 
elled. The  most  pleasing  architectural- 
ly and  the  one  to  which  most  has  been 
done  is  the  Franklin  Inn  Club,  situated 
at  the  intersection  of  Dean  and  St. 
James  streets,  neither  of  which  is  wide 
enough  to  accommodate  more  than  one 
vehicle.  This  circumstance  will  explain 
the  presence  of  the  green  fender  posts 
along  the  curb  to  restrain  a  carter's 
temptation  to  drive  up  on  the  narrow 
sidewalk  upon  meeting  a  wagon  coming 
in  the  opposite  direction  instead  of  one 
or  the  other  having  to  back  ungracefully 
out  of  the  street.  These  posts,  besides 
fulfilling  a  utilitarian  purpose,  serve  as  a 
reminder  of  the  Philadelphia  of  Frank- 
lin's days,  for  they  are  the  successors 
of  those  mentioned  by  William  Black, 
one  of  the  Virginia  Commissioners  who 
visited  Philadelphia  in  1744  and  record- 
ed in  his  diary  after  having  wined  and 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


23 


REMODELED    FRONTS— OLD   HOUSES   IX    LATIMER   STREET,    PHILADELPHIA. 


SMALL  DWELLING  HOUSES-RECLAIMED  PORTION  OF  SMEDLEY  ST..  PHILADELPHIA. 


24 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


dined  too  well  upon  one  occasion:  "I 
grop'd  my  way  to  where  I  lodged  after 
having  Butted  against  some  Posts  on  the 
Sides  of  the  Pavement." 

The  reclamation  of  the  Franklin  Inn 
Club  was  more  in  the  nature  of  a  restor- 
ation than  anythinge  else.  The  general 
contour  of  the  old  dwelling  houses  from 
which  it  was  remodelled  suggested  the 
treatment  adopted.  The  exterior  was 
coated  with  grey  roughcast  stucco, 
throwing  the  white  doorway,  window 
sashes  and  cornice  and  dark  green  shut- 
ters into  strong  contrast.  Beside  the 
doorway  hangs  a  bronze  shingle  bear- 
ing on  either  side  in  relief  the  head  of 
Benjamin  Franklin,  modelled  by  Dr.  R. 
Tait  MacKenzie. 

In  the  next  block,  beyond  Locust 
street,  a  whole  row  of  small  dwelling 
houses  of  early  date  has  been  converted 
into  club  houses  beginning  with  the 
quarters  of  the  Sketch  Club  at  the  cor- 
ner of  Latimer  street  and  including  the 
Coin  d'Or,  the  Poor  Richard  Club  and 
the  Plastic  Club.  Little  has  been  done 
to  the  exteriors  of  these  houses  save 
painting  and  the  making  of  necessary 
repairs.  It  is  gratifying  to  note  with 
reference  to  these  clubs  that  the  oppor- 
tunity for  improvement  presented  by  the 
backyards  has  not  been  neglected. 

The  other  instance  in  which  a  con- 
sistent effort  at  reclamation  has  been 
made  is  in  Carlisle  street,  a  thorough- 
fare running  for  one  block  from  Pine 
street  to  Lombard.  Here  a  row  of  old 
and  uninviting  brick  dwelling  houses 
was  taken  in  hand  by  a  trust  company, 
repaired,  slightly  altered  and  painted  so 
as  to  be  thoroughly  attractive  and  then 
let  at  a  reasonable  rental  to  desirable 
tenants.  In  some  cases  the  alterations 
were  designed  to  suit  the  wishes  of  the 
tenants.  The  experiment  proved  so 
successful  and  the  character  of  the 
neighborhood  was  made  so  agreeable 
that  the  row  has  been  dubbed,  not  inap- 
propriately, "Pomander  Walk." 

Other  attempts  at  reclamation,  though 
scattered,  have  been  numerous  and  suc- 
cessful. Many  of  the  small  houses  are 
so  staunchly  built  that,  so  far  as  the  ex- 
teriors are  concerned,  they  require  only 
well-designed  woodwork  for  the  win- 


dows and  doors,  paint,  the  addition  of 
proper  cornices  and  any  other  minor 
items  of  embellishment  that  personal 
taste  may  dictate,  to  transform  them 
into  desirable  places  of  residence.  As  a 
fairly  representative  example  of  this 
sort  of  thing  may  be  cited  .the  houses 
in  Latimer  street.  At  the  left  side  of 
the  illustration  may  be  seen  what  the 
houses  were  before  reclamation,  while 
at  the  right  the  result  achieved  at  little 
cost  speaks  for  itself.  The  reclamation 
of  these  houses  is  typical  of  what  has 
been  done  with  scores  of  others. 

The  amount  of  interior  alteration  de- 
pends, of  course,  upon  the  inclination  of 
the  occupants,  but  time  and  again  the  in- 
side arrangements  are  susceptible  of 
easy  readjustment  and  the  woodwork  is 
so  good  that  little  has  to  be  done  beyond 
painting  and  papering  and  the  addition 
of  bathrooms  and  plumbing.  The  little 
house  of  which  the  exterior  and  interior 
and  a  mantel  detail  are  shown  required 
only  such  items,  and  it  is  only  one  of 
many.  It  is  hardly  fair  to  cite  this  in- 
stance, where  so  little  has  been  done,  as 
a  case  of  architectural  reclamation,  but 
it  serves  to  show  what  a  groundwork 
there  is  to  work  upon  and  how  rich  it  is 
in  promise  under  sympathetic  handling. 

Altogether  apart  from  architectural 
considerations,  in  this  process  of  redeem- 
ing the  oversight  of  a  former  generation, 
must  be  reckoned  the  marked  advance  in 
real  estate  values  invariably  consequent 
upon  the  improvement  of  a  neighborhood. 
In  one  small  Philadelphia  street  of  the 
sort  previously  mentioned  there  has  been 
a  notable  and  characteristic  example  of 
healthy  and  stable  appreciation  in  the 
value  of  property. 

For  obvious  reasons  it  is  not  expedient 
to  name  the  street  or  indicate  the  individ- 
ual houses  that  have  been  factors  in  this 
desirable  change,  but  if  anyone  is  suf- 
ficiently interested  to  inquire  of  reputable 
real  estate  brokers,  the  facts  in  each  spe- 
cific instance,  backed  up  by  exact  figures, 
may  readily  be  learned.  Six  years  ago 
the  property  values  in  this  particular 
street  were  moderately  low,  a  normal 
condition  for  streets  of  this  character.  At 
that  time  began  the  process  of  reclamation 
through  remodelling  and  the  work  has 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


OFFICE  ON  A  STABLE  SITE— OWN  OFFICE,  JUNIPER  AND   CHANCELLOR   STREETS, 

PHILADELPHIA. 

Mellor  &  Meigs,  Architects. 


continued  since  then  with  more  or  less 
regularity.  During  this  period  real  estate 
values  have  slightly  more  than  doubled, 
and,  in  the  case  of  one  property,  the  value 
has  almost  trebled.  No  more  convincing 
proof  of  the  commercial  utility  of  archi- 
tectural reclamation  could  be  asked  and 
the  argument  ought  to  appeal  to  those 
who  are  in  the  narrow  habit  of  cavilling  at 
anything  as  impracticable  and  visionary  . 
that  cannot  afford  a  demonstration  in  dol- 
lars and  cents.  Experience  has  proved 
time  and  time  again,  that  it  is  well  worth 
while,  both  architecturally  and  financial- 
ly, to  reclaim  the  small  street  and  the 
tangible  proofs  are  at  hand  in  an  endur- 
ing form. 

Whether  the  process  of  reclamation 
consists  of  remodelling  or  of  building 
altogether  anew,  it  is  a  work  worthy 
the  serious  effort  of  architects,  as  may 


be  judged  by  the  instances  cited  in 
Philadelphia  and  Boston,  if  it  be  one  of 
the  functions  of  architecture  to  render 
our  every-day  surroundings  comely  and 
our  cities  consistently  and  universally 
attractive  without  blotches  and  eyesores 
to  detract  from  the  beauty  of  the  finer 
products  of  architectural  endeavor. 

The  only  obstacle  to  venturing  upon 
the  reclamation  of  small  streets  is  the 
uncertainty  regarding  one's  neighbors. 
In  the  cut  showing  the  small  dwelling 
houses  on  Smedley  street  may  be  seen  an 
example  of  this.  This  objection,  how- 
ever, can  be  readily  overcome  by  co- 
operation or  by  getting  a  trust  company 
or  some  reliable  corporation  to  under- 
take the  project  of  redeeming  a  whole 
neighborhood,  and  the  results  so  far  ac- 
complished indicate  plainly  that  the 
game  is  worth  the  candle. 


DETAIL  OF  DOME  IN  LOGGIA- 
VILLA          MADAMA.          ROME. 


THE  VILLA  MADAMA 


TEXT  ANDMEASVRED  DRAW- 
INGS BY  HOWARD  WCERMANN 


ARTICLE  II. 


THE  loggia,  or  large  vestibule,  is  the 
principal  part  of  the  villa  and  is 
the  only  part  that  was  complet- 
ed.* In  fact,  when  speaking  of  the  villa 
Madama  today  one  usually  has  in  mind 
the  loggia  and  its  decorations.  That  the 
works  of  Giulio  Romano  and  Giovanni 
da  Udine  might  be  preserved  the  three 
large  openings  facing  the  terrace  have 
been  closed,  and  the  light  now  enters 
through  glazed  sash  above  the  spring  of 
the  arches. 

Among  the  details  introduced  in  the 
elegant  decorations  of  the  walls  and  ceil- 
ing of  the  loggia  are  animals,  both  in 
their  natural  and  blended  form,  crea- 
tures part  beast,  part  human,  such  as 
fauns,  satyrs,  centaurs,  tritons  and  mer- 
maids. There  are  genii  and  female  fig- 
ures that  uncoil  themselves  from  the 
Drolls  of  acanthus  foliage — griffins,  birds, 
lyres,  flowers,  clusters  of  fruit  and  an 
intermixture  of  variously  shaped  panels 
containing  a  profusion  of  joyous  mytho- 
logical deities,  allegorical  attributes  or 
inscriptions.  Frequently,  too,  appear  the 
six  balls  of  the  Medici  and  the  hat  of  the 
cardinal,  the  diamond  ring  to  which 
Leo  X  had  added  two  hawks  as  support- 
ers, and  which  Lorenzo  de'  Medici  had 
adorned  with  three  feathers,  one  white, 
one  red  and  one  blue,  symbolizing  faith, 
hope  and  charity,  adding  sometimes  the 
word  "Semper,"  signifying,  according  to 
Paolo  Giovia,  Lorenzo's  constancy  in  his 
love  of  God.  We  find  also  the  yoke  used 
by  Leo  X  as  cardinal  in  1512  and  various 
symbolical  objects  forming  parts  of  the 


*A  restoration  of  the  Villa  Madama  was  made  by 
M.  Bernard,  a  French  architect,  in  1871,  and  is  now 
in  the  Ecole  des  Beaux  Arts  in  Paris. 


insignia  of  Giulio  de'  Medici,  such  as  the 
blazing  sun,  the  crystal  ball  and  flames  of 
fire. 

Hittorff  says:  "In  such  works  we  are 
justified  in  saying  that  taste  and  richness 
of  resource  have  reached  their  climax, 
for  since,  by  the  reintroduction  of  stucco, 
it  was  possible  to  blend  the  two  effects  of 
painting  and  sculpture  the  most  distin- 
guished artists  carried  the  execution  of 
the  combined  decorations  to  the  highest 
perfection." 

The  appearance  of  grandeur  given  here 
to  the  smallest  details,  the  grace  and 
lightness  of  form  and  the  charming  har- 
mony and  brilliancy  of  color,  whets  our 
curiosity  to  know  what  this  villa  must 
have  been  like  in  the  heyday  of  joyous 
reveling,  when  these  openings  were  free 
and  the  light  permitted  to  enter  in  its 
full  transparency. 

The  loggia  offers,  not  less  than  that  of 
the  Vatican,  a  choice  example  of  the  dec- 
orative painting  of  the  sixteenth  century, 
but  the  less  extended  loggia  of  the  Villa 
Madama  and  the  less  frequent  repetitions 
of  the  arched  divisions  create  a  less  con- 
fusing effect,  and  the  magnificent  ceiling 
a  more  gratifying  and  charming  influ- 
ence, than  does  the  loggia  of  the  Vati- 
can. 

The  ceiling  of  the  loggia  in  the  Villa 
Madama  consists  of  a  small  dome  on 
pendentives  and  two  groined  vaults,  one 
on  either  side  of  the  dome.  Below  the 
groined  vaults,  opposite  the  openings 
onto  the  terrace,  and  also  in  the  west 
wall,  are  semicircular  exedras  or  large 
niches  containing  smaller  niches  above 
which  are  rectangular  panels  with  vari- 
ous Medici  emblems.  At  one  time  in 


28 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


the  small  niches  were  ancient  statues 
which  were  probably  selected  by  Raphael 
while  he  was  in  charge  of  the  excava- 
tions at  Rome.  The  bust  of  Jupiter  of 
Versailles,  now  in  the  Louvre  at  Paris, 
at  one  time  belonged  to  the  Villa  Ma-, 
dama,  but  this  with  many  other  statues 
was  sent  by  the  Farnese  family  to  the 
King  of  France. 

From  the  center  of  the  loggia  a  passage 
leads  to  a  semi-circular  court  which  was 
once  the  principal  entrance  to  the  villa, 
but  is  now  in  such  a  damaged  state  that 
it  is  impossible  to  form  a  good  idea  of 
its  original  appearance.  The  living 
apartments  are  entered  from  the  passage 
mentioned  above  and  from  the  east  end 
of  the  loggia. 

Examining  the  photographs  we  see  in 
the  center  of  the  dome  the  armorial  bear- 
ings of  the  Medici  and  at  the  four  ends 
of  a  cross  formed  by  small  panels  a 
series  of  beautiful  little  pictures  in  which 
the  elements  are  represented  by  figures 
of  Jupiter,  Juno,  Neptune  and  Pluto. 
Jupiter  is  shown  with  the  eagle,  emblem 
of  strength,  and  bearer  of  his  thunder- 
bolts, and  with  Ganymede  his  cup  bearer ; 
Juno  is  shown  on  a  chariot  drawn  by  pea- 
cocks and  accompanied  by  Eros;  Nep- 
tune is  seen  driving  his  chariot  over  the 
sea ;  and  Pluto  with  Proserpina  is  shown 
among  the  Eumenides,  daughters  of 
Night. 

Between  these  paintings  upon  a  ground 
of  imitated  gold  mosaics  are  white  stucco 
figures  in  circular  panels  representing 
the  seasons.  The  most  graceful  is 
Spring,  to  whom  two  cupids  are  offering 
flowers ;  Summer  is  represented  by  a  fe- 
male figure  with  a  cornucopia  supported 
by  cupids ;  Bacchus,  as  Autumn,  is  seated 
on  a  wine  cask,  while  cupids  assist  him 
with  the  vintage,  and  Winter  is  repre- 
sented by  Vulcan  warming  his  hands 
.  at  the  flame  from  a  tripod  as  Venus 
is  preparing  his  nectar. 

This  rich  center  is  bordered  by  a  frieze 
subdivided  into  eight  square  panels,  and 
in  each  of  the  subdivisions  are  two  genii 
with  bodies  ending  in  acanthus  leaves. 
They  are  engaged  with  panthers,  grif- 
fins and  similar  animals  and  between  the 
genii  is  the  diamond  ring  of  the  Medici. 
Below  this  frieze  a  second  circle  encom- 


passes the  whole  dome  and  is  studded 
with  small  and  elegant  cameos  in  relief. 
In  eight  large  oval  cameos  are  the  prin- 
cipal heathen  deities,  while  in  the  smaller 
ovals  are  muses  and  other  symbolical 
and  mythological  female  figures,  and  in 
the  small  circular  cameos,  ori  either  side 
of  these,  are  similar  but  very  small  fig- 
ures done  in  white  stucco. 

A  delicate  band  with  small  brackets 
and  diamond  shaped  panels  divides  this 
last  circle  ffom  the  pendentives  which 
are  filled  with  rich  flowery  arabesques. 
On  two  of  these  pendentives  diagonally 
opposite  each  other  we  see  the  ring  of 
the  Medici  and  the  three  plumes  added 
by  Lorenzo;  also  the  six  balls  of  the 
Medici  escutcheon,  each  occupying  the 
center  of  a  flower,  and  the  hat  of  the 
cardinal  surmounting  the  composition. 
The  other  two  pendentives  have  ara- 
besques interwoven  with  human  figures. 

Designs  equally  ingenious  may  be  seen 
on  the  soffits  of  the  two  arches  dividing 
the  dome  from  the  groined  vaults.  In 
the  center  of  each  soffit  a  mythological 
subject  has  been  introduced.  They  are 
done  in  stucco  on  a  light  green  back- 
ground ;  in  one  is  Apollo  and  in  the  other 
are  Jupiter  and  Europa. 

The  two  groined  vaults  have  a  sym- 
metrical distribution  of  the  decorations, 
the  detail  of  one  differing  somewhat  from 
that  of  the  other.  In  the  center  of  the 
west  vault  is  Neptune  upon  a  shell  drawn 
by  two  sea-horses.  This  is  done  in 
white  stucco  upon  a  background  of  blue 
with  golden  rays.  On  the  white  field 
of  the  four  divisions  formed  by  the  groin- 
ing is  a  variety  of  colored  arabesques 
similar  in  appearance  to  the  Pompeian 
decorations,  while  the  center  of  each  of 
these  divisions  contains  an  oval  panel 
with  a  painting  and  these  four  paintings 
make  another  interesting  series.  One 
picture,  showing  Daedalus  constructing 
the  wooden  cow  for  Pasiphae,  is  delight- 
fully executed  and  is  the  best  of  the 
four.  Another  shows  the  Garden  of 
Venus  as  described  by  Philostratus.  The 
study  for  this  picture  is  preserved  in 
the  Academy  of  Dusseldorf  and  is  as- 
cribed to  Raphael.  The  other  two  show 
cupids  at  play  and  astride  the  backs  of 
swans.  The  arbors  around  the  base  of 


CEILING   OF   THE   LOGGIA- 
VILLA       MADAMA,       ROME. 


DOME    IN    THE    CENTER    OF    THE 
LOGGIA— VILLA    MADAMA,    ROME. 


C-o 


A  PENDENTIVE  IN  THE  LOGGIA 
—VILLA        MADAMA,         ROME. 


DETAIL  OF  VAULT  OVER 
LEFT  EXEDRA  IN  LOGGIA- 
VILLA  MADAMA,  ROME. 


DETAIL  OF  VAULT  OVER 
LEFT  EXEDRA  IN  LOGGIA- 
VILLA  MADAMA,  ROME. 


VIEW      OF      RIGHT      EXEDRA     IN 
LOGGIA— VILLA    MADAMA,    ROME. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


37 


che  vault  contain  sea-horses  and  children 
in  a  variety  of  attitudes. 

Amphitrite  occupies  the  center  of  the 
east  vault,  and  the  four  paintings  here 
are:  "A  Group  of  Stayrs;"  "Achilles 
Among  the  Daughters  of  Lycomedes;" 
'The  Parting  of  Penelope  and  Icarus," 
and  "The  Amorous  Meeting  of  Her- 
maphroditus  and  Salmacis."  The  border 
around  the  base  of  this  vault  is  divided 
by  shields,  bearing  the  emblems  of 
Clement  VII,  genii,  animals  and  graceful 
arabesques.  Of  exceptional  beauty  are 
the  meanders  of  white  stucco  on  both 
these  vaults. 

The  large  arch,  between  the  loggia  and 
the  passage  opposite  the  entrance,  is  also 
richly  ornamented,  and  the  skill  with 
which  Giulio  Romano  and  Giovanni  da 
Udine  decorated  the  different  parts  of  the 
villa  is  particularly  noticeable  here  in 
small  architectural  compositions,  such  as 
niches  feigning  perspective,  busts  and 
graceful  meanders.  Two  octagonal  pan- 
els in  this  arch  contain  figures  in  relief ; 
on  the  right  Pan  holding  Hermaphroditus 
on  his  knees,  and  on  the  left,  directly 
opposite,  three  fauns  seated  about  a  table. 
The  arabesques  on  the  pilasters  are  done 
in  a  slight  stucco  raised  only  here  and 
there  from  the  background. 

The  side  walls  of  the  passage  have  a 
series  of  niches  similar  to  the  exedras 
and  here  below  a  mask  of  Medusa  is  the 
signature  of  Giovanni  da  Udine. 

The  vault  over  the  left  exedra  is  ex- 
tremely interesting.  At  the  top  upon  a 
shell  is  Victoria  holding  in  her  hands 
corn-ears  and  poppies,  the  attributes  of 
Ceres,  and  grapes,  the  attributes  of 
Bacchus.  Polyphemus'  love  for  Galatea 
is  the  theme  here  for  the  decorations  in 
ten  nearly  square  panels  bordered  by  rich 
arabesques  (shown  on  the  accompanying 
photographs).  On  either  end  of  the  up- 
per row  nymphs  are  shown,  being  carried 
over  the  sea  by  centaurs ;  the  one  at  the 
left  represents  Calm — the  lyre  in  the  hand 
of  the  centaur  suggests  this,  while  the 
one  on  the  right  represents  Tempest — 
the  hair  of  the  centaur  and  the  drapery 
of  the  nymph  are  being  blown  by  the 
storm.  In  the  second  picture  on  the  left 
in  the  top  row  Venus  is  sending  Cupid 
to  Polyphemus  to  stimulate  the  Cyclops' 
love  for  Galatea,  while  the  central  picture 


in  both  the  upper  and  lowei  rows  shows 
the  love-stricken  Polyphemus  striving  to 
disguise  his  rough  exterior.  In  the  upper 
one  he  is  clipping  his  beard  with  a  sickle, 
and  in  the  lower  he  is  harrowing  his 
coarse  locks  with  a  comb.  In  these  pic- 
tures we  notice  that  the  artists  have 
shown  Polyphemus  with  two  eyes  and 
did  not  slavishly  hold  themselves  to  the 
classical  description  of  him  as  a  monster 
with  one  eye  in  the  center  of  his  fore- 
head. 

At  the  left  end  of  the  lower  row  the 
Cyclops  is  seen  sitting  on  a  rock  train- 
ing a  young  bear  that  he  is  to  present 
to  his  beloved  as  a  plaything.  This  mo- 
tive we  find  first  spoken  of  by  Theocritus, 
from  whom  the  later  poets  and  authors 
took  it.  The  next  panel  shows  the 
Cyclops  looking  at  his  coarse  features  in 
a  pool,  and  on  the  opposite  side  of  the 
centre  he  is  singing  of  his  love  for  Gala- 
tea. In  the  panel  above  this  we  learn 
that  the  efforts  of  Polyphemus  are  all  in 
vain,  for  here  the  object  of  his  love  is 
sitting  on  the  knee  of  his  rival,  Acis. 
Polyphemus'  revenge  is  shown  in  the 
lower  right-hand  panel;  he  is  hurling  a 
rock  upon  the  unfortunate  Acis,  and 
Galatea  is  seen  hurrying  away.  This 
whole  cycle  reminds  one  of  the  "Myth 
of  Psyche"  in  the  Villa  Farnesina  at 
Rome,  particularly  the  panel  in  which 
Venus  is  sending  Cupid  to  Polyphemus, 
although  in  the  Farnesina  it  is  woven 
into  a  different  mythcycle  following  the 
accounts  of  Apuleius,  a  Latin  author  of 
the  second  century  much  read  during  the 
Renaissance.  This  motive  was  well 
known  to  the  ancients  in  song  and  pic- 
ture, and  it  is  found  on  numerous  vases 
and  paintings  in  the  lower  part  of  Italy. 
•  The  Renaissance  became  acquainted  with 
it  from  the  Roman  poet  Ovid,  who  intro- 
duced the  rape  of  Proserpina  by  Pluto  in 
this  manner. 

The  vault  over  the  right  exedra  is 
crowned  by  an  elaborately  decorated  shell 
from  which  hangs  a  curtain  and  garlands 
supported  by  heads  of  strange  animals, 
while  animals  still  stranger  are  shown  in 
low  relief  between  the  festoons.  Below 
this  is  a  series  of  panels  of  four,  six  and 
eight  sides.  Rosettes  occupy  the  centres 
of  the  square  ones  and  the  others  have 
figures  in  relief.  In  each  of  the  four 


or- . 
OVEPL  LEFT 


WL  Or-AFLCH 

LQQQIA. 


oo 


i 


o  I 


3K 


v  m  m 


7  &  *#' 

****** 
r        K^ 


5S 


•J  < 
<u 

H  o 

w  o 

Q  5 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD 


47 


hexagonal  panels  is  a  river  god  in  a  re- 
clining position,  but  only  two  of  these 
are  recognized,  the  Nile  represented  by 
a  Sphynx,  and  the  Tiber  by  the  she-wolf 
and  the  twins,  Romulus  and  Remus.  Of 
the  octagonal  panels  the  central  one  con- 
tains genii  and  the  four  remaining  panels 
of  this  row  are  devoted  to  Venus.  On 
the  right  of  the  centre  she  is  dancing 
around  a  tripod  and  in  the  picture  next 
to  this  she  is  shown  blowing  a  trumpet 
as  she  frolics  with  Cupid.  On  the  left 
of  the  centre,  Venus  is  standing  with  one 
foot  on  a  helmet,  while  in  the  last  panel 
she  is  shown  holding  a  wreath  in  one 
hand  while  the  other  grasps  a  lance,  the 
shaft  of  which  is  also  held  by  Cupid. 
This  last  figure,  according  to  Amelung, 
is  the  same  as  an  antique  figure  on  a 
relief  which  was  at  one  time  in  the  villa 
Borghese  and  which  is  now  in  the  Louvre. 
This  motive  was  also  used  by  Lorenzetto 
on  the  bronze  relief  in  the  Chapella 
Chiga  in  the  church  of  Sta.  Maria  del 
Popolo.  The  panels  of  the  lower  row, 
partly  cut  off  by  the  cornice  of  the  exe- 
dra,  contain  reclining  figures,  but  it  is 
difficult  to  determine  what  these  repre- 
sent. 

There  is  hardly  anything  left  of  the 
decorations  on  the  vault  of  the  exedra 
at  the  west  end  of  the  loggia.  A  large 
shell  covered  the  upper  part,  and  on  this 
shell  were  the  cardinal's  hat  and  ara- 


besques, where  again  the  centre  of  six 
large  flowers  contained  the  six  balls  of 
the  Medici  escutcheon.  Besides  parts  of 
the  shell,  two  panels  are  still  left,  one 
round  and  the  other  square.  In  the 
square  panel  we  again  find  the  word 
"Semper."  The  lower  part  of  the  exedra 
has  suffered  severely  from  dampness,  for 
it  is  built  into  the  side  of  the  hill  and 
water  has  seeped  through  and  caused 
much  of  the  stucco  to  fall  off  the  walls. 

In  one  of  the  rooms  of  the  living  apart- 
ments a  frieze  of  slight  interest  is  pre- 
served, while  in  another  room  is  a  dec- 
orated ceiling,  by  Giulio  Romano,  with 
the  Medici  arms  in  the  centre.  The 
pupils  of  Raphael  executed  compositions 
similar  to  those  of  the  Villa  Madama  in 
Rome,  Mantua,  Venice  and  Genoa,  and 
in  these  reached  the  full  development  of 
their  master's  style;  but  with  the  revolt 
against  the  finer  rules  of  the  Renaissance 
which  followed  shortly  after  the  Sack  of 
Rome  in  1527  and  marked  the  beginning 
of  the  Baroque  period,  came  more  massive 
compositions.  Patrons,  stimulated  by 
the  examples  of  the  popes,  desired  vast 
and  showy  decorative  works  with  a 
sumptuous  parade  of  superficial  orna- 
ment ;  this  the  artists  attempted  to  sup- 
ply. The  delicate  kind  of  decoration  full 
of  seriousness  was  no  longer  followed ; 
the  love  of  false  magnificence  had  re- 
placed the  feeling  of  real  grandeur. 


FRONT  DOOR  AND  PORCH-OWN 
HOUSE,  NEW  CANAAN,  CONN. 
ELECTUS  LITCHFIELD,  ARCHITECT. 


SOUTH  FRONT-OWN  HOUSE,  NEW  CANAAN,  CONN. 
Electus  D.   Litchfield,  Architect. 

AN  ARCHITECT'S 
COVNTRY   HOVSE 

I?  Residence  gf  Electus  Litchfield, 
New  Canaan,  Connecticut  ® 

By  Harriet  T  Bottomley 


1HAVE  before  me  the  very  delightful 
task  of  writing  about  -the  country 
home  of  Electus  D.  Litchfield,  Esq. 
"The  House  with  the  Blue  Blinds,"  it  is 
called,  and  it  possesses  all  the  sympa- 
thetic charm  that  one  would  expect  of  a 
house  with  such  a  name.  Situated  about 
one  mile  from  the  New  Canaan  station  on 
a  small  plateau  that  seems  to  have  been 
made  for  just  this  house,  it  lodges  secure- 
ly among  the  rolling,  wooded  hills  about 
it  and  stretches  its  long,  low,  white  arms 
above  the  valley  that  slopes  away  from 
its  front  drive,  to  the  shore  of  Long 
Island  Sound  seven  miles  away.  It  is  a 
pleasure  to  see,  on  approaching  it  from 
the  highway,  how  perfectly  it  is  in  har- 
mony with  its  New  England  surround- 
ings. 


Something  over  a  hundred  and  fifty 
years  ago  the  settlers  in  this  part  of  the 
New  World  evolved  a  style  of  architec- 
ture adapted  to  this  very  country.  It 
was  the  outgrowth  of  memories,  more  or 
less  definite,  of  Georgian  architecture  at 
home  in  England,  modified  by  totally  new 
conditions  of  climate  and  materials.  The 
Georgian  details  which  were  originally 
designed  for  execution,  in  stone,  had  to  be 
adapted  and  redesigned  before  they  could 
be  made  effective  in  wood,  which,  from 
the  days  of  the  early  colonies  to  the  pres- 
ent time,  has  always  been  the  cheapest 
and  most  abundant  building  material  to 
be  had  in  New  England.  A  style  of 
architecture  resulted  that  is  peculiarly 
American  and  very  satisfying;  classic  in 
its  inspiration,  it  is  true,  but  exceedingly 


50 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


LIVING  ROOM  PORCH  AND  FLOOR  PLANS 
—OWN  HOUSE,  NEW  CANAAN,  CONN. 
ELECTUS  D.  LITCHFIELD,  ARCHITECT. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


51 


VIEW   FROM   THE   SOUTHEAST— OWN   HOUSE,   NEW   CANAAN,   CONN. 
Electus  D.  Litchfield,  Architect. 


free  in  its  readjustment  of  classic  details, 
and  unique  in  its  development.  Nothing 
has  ever  been  designed  that  suited  better, 
or  as  well,  the  New  England  landscape, 
and  the  life  imposed  by  climatic  condi- 
tions upon  its  inhabitants.  Those  de- 
signers of  today  are  wise  who  follow  the 
well-grounded  traditions  of  the  country 
and  build  upon  the  hillsides  of  Connecti- 
cut, long,  low,  white  houses,  inspired  by 
the  long,  low,  white  houses  of  long  ago. 
"The  House  of  the  Blue  Blinds"  is  such 
a  building. 

It  is  unusually  interesting  also  in  that 
it  is  an  architect's  own  home,  planned 
and  built  for  himself  and  his  family  to 
live  in.  Here  we  are  looking  at  a  build- 
ing into  which  no  interfering  client  ob- 
truded his  ideas.  There  was  in  this  case, 
however,  one  consideration  that  stayed 
the  imagination  of  the  designer — the  con- 
sideration of  expense.  For  this  house 
was  built  upon  the  firm  foundation  of 
common  sense.  Its  prospective  owner 
and  its  architect  decided  that,  come  what 
might,  he  would  invest  in  his  house  and 
land  only  the  capital  represented  by  the 


rent  he  had  been  paying  for  other  people's 
houses.  He  had,  to  start  with,  a  knowl- 
edge of  what  houses  cost,  and  he  modified 
his  ideas  and  designed  such  a  house  as 
he  thought  could  be  built  for  his  fixed 
sum  of  money,  making  certain  compro- 
mises in  order  to  bring  down  the  cost. 
In  time,  as  he  chooses,  he  can  add  to  and 
change  his  original  to  exactly  meet  his 
ideals.  When  reducing  his  estimates  he 
wisely  decided  to  cut  nothing  from  his 
finished  details.  How  many  houses  have 
been  spoiled  by  cheap,  coarse  trim  and 
bad  mouldings.  It  is  no  easy  matter  to 
repair  such  damage,  whereas  it  is  always 
possible  to  add  to  what  is  simple  but 
good.  Therefore,  cornices,  doorways  and 
leadings  were  carried  out  with  the  finest 
execution.  But  the  cost  was  very  mate- 
rially reduced  by  certain  omissions. 
Hardwood  floors,  for  instance,  were  not 
laid,  but  the  wide  boards  of  the  under 
flooring  were  left  exposed  and  painted  a 
yellow  that  recalls  vividly  old  New  Eng- 
land farm  houses.  The  present  mantels, 
though  they  undoubtedly  have  a  certain 
quaint  effect,  are  only  temporary  and  are 


H 

*Q 

ifd 

"w 

gfe 

2« 
s  o 


s^ 

a  o 
H  u 


54 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


to  be  replaced  some  day  by  handsomer 
ones.  They  were  bought  from  a  nouse 
wrecking  company  in  New  York,  four 
of  them  for  the  sum  of  $16.  The  building 
contractor's  estimates  were  further  re- 
duced by  replacing  the  proposed  dressed 
stone  coping  of  the  brick  porches  by 
bricks  stood  on  end  in  cement,  by  sub- 
stituting cattle  hair  felt  quilting  over  the 
studs  and  under  the  shingles  for  the  pro- 
posed brick  filling  between  the  studs,  and 
by  using  ordinary  shingles  doubled  in- 
stead of  the  extra  long,  hand-split  ones 
of  the  Colonial  houses. 

The  first  thing  one  feels  on  approach- 
ing this  house  is  its  absolute  appropriate- 
ness to  its  site.  The  building  is  enclosed 
on  its  own  plot  of  ground  by  a  white 
fence  of  Colonial  pattern.  Its  rear  and 
side  are  toward  the  highway,  and  a  pri- 
vate road  leads  around  to  the  main  en- 
trance of  the  house,  which  faces  the 
lovely  view  to  the  south.  Informal  visit- 
ors may  enter  from  the  side  through  a 
gate  in  the  fence,  from  which  a  foot- 
path of  irregular  flat  stones  leads  to  the 
side  door.  This  gate  is  an  excellent 
point  from  which  to  study  some  of  the 
charming  details  of  the  house.  The 
cornice,  so  delicate  in  effect,  is  partially 
at  least,  a  product  of  New  Canaan.  The 
frieze  was  seen  by  Mr.  Litchfield  on  an 
old  building  in  the  neighborhood  which 
was  being  torn  down  by  its  unappreciative 
owner,  and  copied  by  him  on  his  own 
house.  It  is  very  simple  in  design,  but 
exquisite  in  effect.  It  consists  simply  of 
groups  of  alternate  reeds  and  grooves,  the 
reeds  being  about  two  inches  longer  than 
their  concave  neighbors.  This  grouping 
was  evidently  derived  from  the  Greek 
triglyphs.  The  perforated  board  brack- 
ets, taking  the  place  of  the  classic  mu- 
tules,  in  the  cornice  above  the  reeding 
in  the  frieze,  add  an  interesting  contrast 
of  dark  and  light  to  the  overhanging 
eaves.  The  fan-lights  in  the  gable-end, 
and  the  lattice  around  the  porch  are 
worthy  of  notice  here. 

The  main  front  of  the  house  is  de- 
lightful. Its  porch,  with  the  elliptical 
arch,  slender  columns  and  side  lights,  and 
the  Palladian  motive  directly  above,  make 
a  charming  center  to  the  composition  of 
the  simple  facade  with  the  double  row  of 


large  plain  windows.  The  porches  at 
either  end  are,  of  course,  modern  addi- 
tions to  this  style  of  architecture,  but 
they  have  been  made  so  fine  and  light  that 
they  seem  an  appropriate  and  integral 
part  of  the  design.  They  suit  the  style 
as  perfectly  as  do  other  portions  of  the 
house  that  have  been  carefully  studied 
from  historic  models. 

The  leadings  around  the  front  door 
are  specially  interesting  from  the  point  of 
view  of  their  execution.  They  are  not. 
by  the  way,  made  after  the  manner  of 
European  or  later  American  leadings. 
They  are  true  examples  of  early  Colonial ; 
that  is,  the  glass  is  cut  only  by  the  main, 
structural  wooden  muntins  in  the  design, 
and  the  merely  decorative  pattern  in  lead 
and  wood  is  an  entirely  separate  affair, 
set  in  front  of  the  glass.  By  this  method 
a  very  pretty  effect  is  gained  from  the  re- 
flections of  the  pattern  in  the  glass  be- 
hind it. 

The  front  door  opens  directly  into  a 
hall  with  dining-room  and  living-room  on 
either  side  of  it,  as  is  usual  in  this  type 
of  house,  but  there  is  a  very  clever  modi- 
fication here  of  the  typical  Colonial  plan 
which  was  developed  from  a  wish  of  Mrs. 
Litchfield's  when  the  house  was  still  only 
a  dream.  She  said  she  Had  always 
wanted  a  room  with  windows  on  three 
sides  of  it.  This  wish  was  the  inspiration 
of  the  present  plan,  in  which  there  are  not 
merely  one,  but  six  rooms  with  windows 
on  three  sides  of  them.  A  glance  at  the 
plan  will  show  that  the  main  house  is 
narrow,  only  one  room  deep  in  fact,  each 
end  room  having  three  external  walls 
pierced  by  windows.  One  difficulty  pre- 
sented itself.  The  hall,  being  only  the 
depth  of  the  main  house,  was  shallow — 
too  shallow  comfortably  to  accommodate 
a  generous  flight  of  stairs  as  well  as  the 
doors  into  the  rooms  to  the  right  and 
left.  After  some  puzzling  over  this  prob- 
lem, the  kitchen  wing  was  placed  directly 
opposite  the  front  door,  but  slightly 
off  axis,  and  the  hallway  was  run  back 
into  it,  the  flight  of  stairs  starting  at  the 
intersection  of  this  wing  with  the  main 
house.  Instead  of  the  usual  back  door 
opposite  the  front  door,  a  side  entrance 
was  made  opening  on  the  stone  walk  al- 
ready referred  to.  There  are  obviously 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


55 


SIDE  ENTRANCE-OWN  HOUSE,  NEW  CANAAN,  CONN. 
Electus  D.   Litchfield,  Architect. 


great  advantages  in  this  over  the  typical 
New  England  plan,  and  for  the  site  of 
the  "House  with  the  Blue  Blinds,"  it 
could  not  be  improved  upon.  By  this  ar- 
rangement the  master's  bedrooms,  as  well 
as  the  drawing-room  and  dining-room, 
get  lovely  views  in  three  directions,  and 
excellent  crossdrafts.  The  house  has  the 
best  possible  exposure.  It  faces  south, 
where  the  finest  view  is  to  be  seen,  and 
where  the  summer  breezes  .come  from ; 
the  windows  to  the  north  give  free  cir- 
culation, and  the  house  is  flooded  with 
sunshine  in  winter. 

Imagine  the  wide  hall  with  generous 
doors  of  exquisite  designs  and  workman- 
ship opening  to  the  right  and  the  left. 
Old  painted  chairs,  black  with  gold  deco- 
rations, a  quaint  old  sofa  and  mirror  and 
a  "tall  clock  looking  like  a  mummy  set  on 
end,"  give  the  keynote  of  the  furnishings 
of  the  "House  with  the  Blue  Blinds," 
which  is  style.  Every  piece  of  furniture 
Is  suitable.  There  is  something  clumsy 
about  much  of  the  early  American  cabi- 
net work,  something  not  quite  arrived 
about  the  detail.  In  the  handsome  ma- 


hogany sofa  in  the  living-room,  for  in- 
stance, the  legs,  flat  pieces  of  wood  sawed 
in  a  rather  awkward  outline,  are  what 
give  it  its  undeniable  cachet.  The  old 
prints  on  the  wall,  stiff  and  technically 
rather  crude  in  some  instances,  suit  the 
house  to  perfection.  The  silhouettes  on 
the  stairway  and  the  quaint  old  bric-a- 
brac  and  blue  china,  all  handed  down 
from  our  American  forefathers,  have  a 
delightful  effect. 

In  the  entrance  hall  is  the  same  picture 
wall  paper  that  covered  the  parlor  walls 
in  the  childhood  home  of  Thomas  Baily 
Alclrich  in  Portsmouth.  In  his  "Story 
of  a  Bad  Boy"  be  gives  the  following 
graphic  description  of  it :  "In  the  parlor 
this  enlivening  figure  is  repeated  all  over 
the  room.  A  group  of  English  peasants, 
wearing  Italian  hats,  are  dancing  on  a 
lawn  that  abruptly  resolves  itself  into  a 
sea-beach,  upon  which  stands  a  flabby 
fisherman  (nationality  unknown)  quietly 
hauling  in  what  appears  to  be  a  small 
whale,  and  totally  regardless  of  the 
dreadful  naval  combat  going  on  just  be- 
yond the  end  of  his  fishing-rod.  On  the 


SB 

<  w 

is 

3  SB 
U  u 


H 


58 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


LIVING  ROOM-OWN  HOUSE,  NEW  CANAAN.  CONN. 
Electus  D.   Litchfield,  Architect. 


other  side  of  the  ships  is  the  mainland 
again,  with  the  same  peasants  dancing. 
Our  ancestors  were  worthy  people,  but 
their  wall  papers  were  abominable.  I  can- 
not, however,  agree  with  Mr.  Aldrich  that 
this  paper  is  "abominable."  Certainly  the 
effect  in  this  particular  place  is  perfect. 
From  the  ceiling  in  this  hall  hangs  a 
black  iron  lantern  with  engraved  glass 
panels.  The  stairway  leads  to  a  second 
story,  much  like  the  first  in  arrangement, 
and  above  that  is  a  garret,  capable  of 
developing  into  a  real,  old-fashioned  gar- 
ret, "a  museum  of  curiosities,"  such  as 
we  who  have  had  New  England  grand- 
parents remember  so  well.  The  slender 
banisters  and  handrail  of  the  main 
staircase  are  of  cherry  stained  almost 
black  and  rubbed  down  to  a  soft  gloss. 
With  this  exception,  and  that  of  the  trim 
the  service  wing,  the  woodwork 


in 


throughout  the  house  is  painted  white. 

The  door  frames  leading  to  the  right 
and  left  from  the  hall  into  the  dining- 
room  and  living-room  were  copies  of  old 
Salem  doorways,  unusually  well  executed 


in  every  detail.  The  cornice,  the  fes- 
tooned napkins,  the  baskets  of  fruit,  and 
the  reeding  are  beautifully  modelled. 
Drawings  of  these  same  Salem  doorways 
are  reproduced  in  the  "Georgian  Period," 
but  any  architect  or  decorator  wishing  to 
copy  them  would  do  well  to  use  the 
photographs  accompanying  this  article  in- 
stead of  the  older  drawings,  which  are  not 
accurate  in  detail. 

The  living-room  is  large  and  homelike, 
with  six  windows,  two  of  them  opening 
on  the  comfortably  furnished  porch  be- 
yond. Opposite  the  door  is  a  generous 
fire-place  "with  room  enough  for  the 
corpulent  back-log  to  turn  over  com- 
fortably on  the  polished  andirons."  A 
group  of  inviting  chairs  is  gathered  about 
it.  The  foliage  wall  paper,  soft  gray  in 
tone,  makes  an  excellent  background  for 
the  old  furniture  and  mirrors.  The 
modern  electric  light  fixtures  are  simple, 
shaded  with  engraved  glass  chimneys,  and 
on  the  mantle  are  two  unique  glass  lamps 
and  a  pair  of  quaint  painted  vases.  The 
effect  of  gray  and  black  and  gold  in  this 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


59 


LIVING  ROOM— OWN  HOUSE,  NEW  CANAAN,  CONN. 
Electus  D.  Litchfield,  Architect. 


room  is  exceedingly  good.  There  are 
always  quantities  of  bright  flowers  from 
the  garden  everywhere. 

The  dining-room  across  the  hall  is  no 
less  charming  in  effect.  The  blue  china 
and  mahogany  seem  to  require  the  buff 
wall/  which  is  given  full  value  by  the 
long,  blue  curtains  at  the  French  win- 
dows, and  the  fresh  white  ones  at  the 
others.  The  banister  back  dining-room 
chairs  are  rare  examples  o-f  American 
furniture.  Luke  Vincent  Lockwood,  in 
his  invaluable  book  on  "Colonial  Furni- 
ture," places  this  type  of  chair  between 
the  years  1710  and  1750.  They  are 
painted  black,  with  rush  bottom  seats. 
The  center  table  of  mahogany  is  old  too, 
as  are  the  prim  side  tables  of  inlaid  wal- 
nut. 

It  is  interesting  to  note  the  cement 
facing  in  the  fire-place.  Ninety-nine 
times  out  of  a  hundred  the  Colonial  build- 
ers covered  their  brick  facings  in  this 
Way. 

The  photograph  of  the  bedroom  on  the 
second  floor  gives  a  very  clear  idea  of 
how  good  the  furnishings  upstairs  are. 


The  slender  four-poster  with  its  delight- 
ful spread  of  tufted  cotton,  the  high- 
boy, the  painted  chair  and  the  ornaments 
on  and  about  the  mantelpiece  are  all  very 
stylish, 

There  are  almost  as  many  outdoor  as 
indoor  rooms  in  this  house.  The  brick 
paved  porches  on  the  ground  floor  open- 
ing at  each  end  are  delightful  places  to 
sit.  On  the  second  floor  over  these  are 
two  more  porches  open  to  the  sky.  One 
of  them  is  provided  with  an  awning  in 
summer  and  makes  an  admirable  sleeping 
porch,  though  really  it  is  scarcely  more 
airy  than  the  bedroom  off  which  it  opens. 
The  service  wing  is  amply  provided  with 
porches  also,  which  are  skillfully  placed 
away  from  the  master's  part  of  the  house. 

It  is  unusual  to  see  a  house  in  which 
the  conveniences,  all  the  little  things 
which  the  housekeeper  prizes  so  highly, 
have  been  carefully  thought  out  and  em- 
bodied in  the  building.  Just  to  mention 
one  little  device  that  adds  greatly  to  the 
convenience  at  certain  times,  the  service 
stairs  are  straight  and  open  into  a  nar- 
row hall,  which  runs  parallel  to  them. 


DOORWAY-OWN,       HOUSE,       NEW       CANAAN 
CONN.     ELECTUS  D.  LITCHFIELD,  ARCHITECT. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


63 


They  are  wide  enough  to  admit  of  the 
passage  of  a  large  trunk,  but  it  would  be 
impossible  to  turn  the  trunk  in  the  narrow 
hall  above,  were  it  not  for  a  simple  and 
clever  arrangement.  The  railing  at  the 
head  of  the  stairs  is  made  entirely  sepa- 
rate from  the  built-in  woodwork,  and  is 
clamped  in  place  by  iron  fasteners.  These 
can  be  opened  and  the  whole  railing  lifted 
out  of  the  way,  making  room  for  the 
most  uncompromising  trunk.  Many  a 
house  would  be  much  improved  by  an  in- 
vention of  this  kind. 

Another  detail  which  simplifies  the 
service  is  the  placing  of  the  wood  and 
coal  bins,  which  are  just  outside  the 
kitchen  door  on  a  level  with  it,  so  there 
is  no  carrying  up  and  down  stairs.  These 
simple  conveniences  so  little  appreciated 
by  the  casual  visitors  are  highly  prized  by 
the  inmates  of  the  house,  masters  and 
servants  alike. 

The  kitchen  wing  is  screened  from  the 
front  of  the  house  by  high  vine-covered 
lattices,  and  on  the  west  is  cut  off  from 
the  side  entrance  and  the  road  by  its 
vvindowless  lower  story. 

Before  closing  this  article  I  must  not 
forget  the  garden.  It  is  on  the  south 
slope  of  the  hill,  some  SO  yards  from  the 
front  door  in  the  hollow,  between  the 
apple  orchard  on  one  side  and  a  grove 
of  maples  on  the  other.  This  is  an  ideal  lo- 
cation. From  the  house,  it  leads  away  into 
the  view,  and  a  sunnier,  more  protected 
situation  could  not  be  found.  This  garden 
is  planted  between  two  rugged  old  stone 
walls,  about  15  feet  apart,  that  are  a  legacy 
from  the  original  farm  which  included 
Mr.  Litchfield's  land.  They  were  built  to 
form  a  lane  for  the  cows  leading  from  the 
barn,  which  has  long  since  disappeared, 


to  the  pasture.  Fortunately  this  lane  is 
much  wider  than  most,  tracks  of  the  sort, 
and  the  gray  lichen  covered  stone  walls 
form  a  lovely  background  for  flowers  and 
growing  things.  A  little  brook  running 
down  the  hill  to  the  right  crosses  the 
further  end  of  this  lane.  Mr.  Litchfield 
has  built  a  rectangular  pool  just  beyond 
the  garden  in  whose  clear  sheet  of  water 
the  house  above  and  the  nearby  flowers 
are  reflected.  Some  day  the  hollow  be- 
low is  to  be  transformed  into  a  small 
lake. 

Looking  straight  up  the  garden  be- 
tween the  stone  walls  and  the  tall  cedars, 
one  gets  a  lovely  glimpse  of  the  house  at 
all-  seasons ;  when  .the  peonies  are  in 
bloom  in  the  garden,  reaching  up  their 
brilliant  flowers  in  front  of  the  white 
house;  when  the  larkspur  and  madonna 
lilies  rise  in  straight  dignity  from  the  long 
borders,  challenging  the  white  house  on 
the  hill  to  be  as  dignified  as  they  ;  or  again 
in  the  autum  when  only  the  cosmos  and 
the  red  leaves  are  left  in  a  last  glorious 
array  of  color.  The  house  itself  is  an- 
other center  for  flowers.  Climbing  roses, 
clematis  and  honeysuckle  grow  about  it 
on  all  sides.  They  climb  over  the  front 
porch  and  reach  toward  the  arch  above 
the  beautifully  proportioned  slender  col- 
umns, and  hang  over  the  quaint  porch 
seats. 

At  first  one  does  not  realize,  in  looking 
at  the  house,  that  its  very  finished  and 
harmonious  effect  is  largely  due  to  just 
such  beautifully  studied  details  as  are 
seen  in  this  entrance  porch  and  which  are 
to  be  found  all  through  it.  The  real 
interest  and  affection  of  its  designer  have 
been  lavished  on  each  line  and  curve  and 
the  result  is  a  home  of  rare  charm. 


ENTRANCE  TO  UNIVERSITY  HALI^- WASH- 
INGTON UNIVERSITY,  ST.  LOUIS.  MO. 
COPE  &  STEWARDSON,  ARCHITECTS. 


UNIVERSITY    HALL— WASHINGTON    UNIVERSITY,    ST.    LOUIS,    MO. 
Cope  &  Stewardson,  Architects. 


WASHINGTON  VNIVERSITYI 

ST.  LOVIS.    MISSOVRI 


Cope  (&L  Stewardson 
Architects 


IN  1834,  more  than  a  century  after 
many  of  the  colleges  had  been  found- 
ed in  the  States  along  the  Atlantic 
Coast,  William  Greenleaf  Eliot,  a  Har- 
vard theological  student,  came  to  St. 
Louis  to  become  the  first  minister  of  the 
Unitarian  Church  of  the  Messiah.  The 
role  this  young  man  played  in  the  subse- 
quent history  of  the  city  and  the  State 
was  so  distinguished  that  in  1853,  by  an 
|  act  of  the  State  Legislature,  a  charter  was 
granted  to  Eliot  Seminary,  in  his  honor. 
Four  years  later,  in  order  to  meet  the 
broadest  requirements  of  a  great  educa- 
tional institution,  Eliot  Seminary  became 
Washington  University.  Loyally  sup- 
ported by  generous  friends,  Dr.  Eliot  be- 
came its  directing  force,  and  finally 
served  as  chancellor  during  the  last  eigh- 
Iteen  years  of  his  life.  Even  the  gift  of 
John  Harvard  of  £400  and  his  library  of 
two  hundred  volumes,  to  the  institution 
that  bears  his  name,  is  incomparable  to 
what  William  Greenleaf  Eliot  did  for 
[Washington  University  in  his  repeated 

8-0 


gifts  and  faithful  service  during  the  per- 
iod of  a  generation ;  and  its  enviable  dis- 
tinction as  a  seat  of  the  highest  learning 
is  the  enduring  imprint  of  its  founder. 

The  first  buildings  that  housed  the 
university  were  substantial  but  plain. 
They  were  located  in  what  was  then  the 
outskirts  of  the  city.  But  after  thirty 
years  the  business  section  of  St.  Louis 
had  expanded,  and  began  to  encroach 
dangerously  upon  the  university.  At  a 
period  when  its  buildings  were  only  be- 
coming venerable  Washington  University, 
contracted  by  want  of  space,  and  ham- 
pered by  the  uncongenial  atmosphere  of 
commerce,  was  forced  to  seek  a  new 
location. 

Facing  the  necessity  of  moving  bodily, 
the  trustees  conceived  of  a  greater  uni- 
versity, a  university  that  should  mean  to 
the  Central  West  what  Harvard  does  to 
New  England ;  endowed  with  ample 
funds,  and  housed  in  buildings  worthy  of 
its  splendid  record.  As  in  the  past,  public- 
spirited  citizens  appeared,  and  the  mag- 


SS  s 
.IS  I 


,. 

"  gg 


O  ££, 
CS  rt 

I  Is 

rt  C'E 

fc  rt  D 

;1  "88 

,3  -S-& 


I  I 


! 

o 


£3'2'o*k-£i:£     fi 

^5  I   I^   ^ 

p-js^;o   OH     <?tf      w 


•o    ^ 

.C       o 
,«S      Q 


>>.      OT 

h    c 

gs 


|3  .cc°S§ 
Q  n^ssab 


oW    ^i 

W^    Q..o«2c"5'E 

^^^fc,a?0=  g  Offl  O 

S&CS-S»3P53    S 

||3|p?^|^| 

&H)      h5      ^      P^      ^ 


"Co 


Sg 
•gl 

S-i 


OS 

•05 


ES 


5° 

>>bo 

•o  c 

II 


3  £ 

PQCU 


<  71  » 

|     o^  Ji-c  I 

^S  C)  O  O 

j,  .^bo  ^=S  '|>. 


tQ  .52  W3  H         CO 

fc  .^e^.s,sw-^ 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


67 


BUSCH  HALL— WASHINGTON  UNIVERSITY,   ST.   LOUIS,  MO. 
Cope  &  Stewardson,  Architects. 


nificent  sum  of  several  millions  of  dollars 
was  raised — a  sum  sufficient  to  assure  for 
all  time  the  existence  of  the  university. 
The  crystallization  of  this  undertaking 
reflects  the  character  of  the  men  who  con- 
ceived it  and  whose  untiring  labors  have 
forwarded  it  to  its  partial  completion. 
The  location  chosen  for  the  new  buildings 
was  a  thinly  wooded  plateau  overlooking 
Forest  Park  and  the  city  of  St.  Louis. 
The  trustees  of  Washington  University 
wisely  decided  upon  a  competition  to 
choose  their  architect.  This  competition 
was  held  in  1900.  The  successful  com- 
petitors were  Cope  and  Stewardson.  Ad- 
mirable as  were  all  the  competing  draw- 
ings, yet  one  cannot  but  feel  that  the 
English  Tudor  style,  interpreting  the  re- 
markable plan  of  Cope  and  Stewardson, 
was  most  fortunate.  The  plan,  while 
somewhat  void  of  the  "brilliant  axis"  and 
"focal  point"  arrangements  essential  to 
the  splendor  of  a  cold,  monumental  pro- 
ject, was  a  plan  full  of  subtleness  and  of 
unexpected  charm,  of  picturesque  ar- 
rangements of  courts  and  compositions 
of  facades,  features  not  strikingly  evident 
on  paper,  yet  all  convincing  in  reality. 


Without  delay,  eight  of  the  principal 
buildings  were  begun.  A  rich  reddish- 
brown  Missouri  granite,  laid  in  rambling 
rubble,  with  Bedford  limestone  for  all 
cut  stone  work,  was  the  material  uni- 
formly employed.  Honesty  of  construc- 
tion and  truthfulness  of  material  make 
the  buildings  of  the  university  group  not 
only  models  of  workmanship  but  rare 
examples  of  architecture  in  an  age  of 
cheap  and  commercial  structures.  By 
1904,  the  year  of  the  Louisiana  Purchase 
Exposition,  the  eight  buildings,  some 
bearing  the  names  of  the  persons  who 
gave  them,  were  completed  :  University 
Hall,  Busch  Hall,  Cupples  Hall  No.  1  and 
No.  2,  Ridgley  Library,  Eads  Hall,  Tow- 
er Dormitory,  Liggett  Hall  and  the  Gym- 
nasium. In  1907,  McMillan  Hall  and  the 
Graham  Memorial  Chapel  were  added. 
Early  in  the  spring  of  1905,  the  under- 
graduate departments  were  transferred  to 
the  new  campus.  At  last,  permanently 
housed  and  safely  fortified  by  the  mag- 
nificent park  of  3,000  acres,  Washington 
University  now  only'  awaits  the  loving 
hand  of  time  again  to  render  venerable 
her  walls  already  covered  with  ivy. 


68 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


CUPPLES  HALL  NO.  2-WASHINGTON   UNIVERSITY,   ST.   LOUIS,  MO. 
Cope  &  Stewardson,  Architects. 


TOWER  DORMITORY— WASHINGTON  UNIVERSITY,  ST.  LOUIS,  MO. 
Cope  &  Stewardson,  Architects. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


69 


RIDGLEY  LIBRARY-WASHINGTON  UNIVERSITY,  ST.  LOUIS,  MO. 

Cope  &  Stewardson,  Architects. 


EADS  HALL— WASHINGTON   UNIVERSITY,   ST.    LOUIS,   MO. 
Cope  &  Stewardson,  Architects. 


70 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


While  Washington  must  wait  centuries 
fa*  her  elms  to  grow,  for  her  stones  to 
mellow  with  age,  her  harmonious  group, 
in  one  of  the  most  charming  of  styles, 
gives  the  institution  a  start  that  few  uni- 
versities in  America  have  had. 

The  rule  of  Emerson,  to  allow  ten 
years  to  test  the  value  of  a  book,  may  be 
applied  as  well  to  architecture.  Scarcely 
any  of  the  forced  styles  have  remained 
in  use  this  long.  The  ethnic  relationship 
of  English  Gothic  is  right,  and  to-day, 
after  more  than  ten  years,  Washington's 
group  continues  to  hold  one  by  its  inim- 
itable charm ;  and  to  appreciate  fully  and 
realize  its  charm  one  must  live  within  its 
walls.  Praise,  then,  is  the  natural  criti- 
cism of  so  important  a  group  of  buildings, 
designed  by  a  strong  man  to  whom  fell 
the  good  fortune  of  planning  their  struc- 
ture and  to  whom,  after  he  had  met  all 
requirements,  was  allowed  a  free  hand. 

The  principal  building  of  this  remark- 
able group  is  University  Hall,  the  gift  of 
Robert  S.  Brookings.  Its  commanding 
position,  approached  by  a  great  flight  of 
steps  and  a  broad  terrace,  is  inspiring. 
The  composition  of  the  main  facade  is 
masterly.  The  end  facades  of  Busch  and 
Cupples  Halls  are  really  parts  of  this  su- 
perb composition.  The  transition  from 
one  Hall  to  the  other  formed  by  the  arch- 
ways is  most  pleasing,  while  the  pictur- 
esque silhouette  untiringly  leads  the  eye 
up  to  the  crowning  motive  of  the  central 
towers.  The  first  building  of  this  group  is 
very  appropriately  in  the  style  of  the 
earliest  of  the  English  periods  employed. 
It  falls  under  the  style  of  the  period  of 
King  Henry  VII,  when  the  oriel  window 
was  at  its  best,  when  the  windows  and 
doors  were  Gothic  rather  than  Renais- 
sance, and  only  Gothic  motives  appeared 
in  the  mouldings  and  decorations.  The 
central  archway  and  towers,  while  sug- 
gested by  several  archways  at  Cambridge 
or  Oxford,  are  far  from  being  copies  of 
any  of  them. 

Passing  through  the  Tudor  arch  and 
groined  passage,  one  comes  into  the  First 
Quadrangle.  Directly  in  front  stands  the 
Ridgley  Library;  to  the  right,  Cupples 
Hall  No.  1,  occupied  by  the  School  of 
Architecture  and  Department  of  Civil 
Engineering;  to  the  left,  Busch  Hall,  oc- 


cupied by  the  Department  of  Chemistry. 
L6ng  and  low  is  the  main  facade  of  Cup- 
pies  Hall,  with  two  entrances  developed 
into  pavilions.  One  finds  here  the  intro- 
duction of  the  Renaissance.  The  pedi- 
ment over  the  door,  the  impost  and  base 
of  the  door  arch  and  the  carved  orna- 
ment, while  Renaissance,  are  cleverly  han- 
dled so  as  to  give  a  strongly  Gothic  feel- 
ing. The  balustrade  serving  as  a  low 
parapet  wall  and  the  sun-dial  over  the 
central  bay,  on  the  other  hand,  are  quite 
Renaissance  in  treatment. 

Directly  across  the  Quadrangle  in 
Busch  Hall,  the  general  mass  of  which 
recalls  Cupples,  one  finds  more  sugges- 
tions from  the  Elizabethan  period.  That 
period  of  English  architecture  which  has 
withstood  much  severe  criticism  and 
whose  rightful  claim  to  artistic  worth  re- 
appears many  times  throughout  this  mod- 
ern group  of  buildings.  This  style  was 
the  result  of  the  second  wave  of  the  Ren- 
aissance that  came  from  Germany,  bring- 
ing with  it  German  and  Flemish  work- 
men who  introduced  the  strapwork  mo- 
tives and  pattern  book  designs,  executing 
them  in  plaster,  wood  and  even  in  stone. 
The  doorways  of  Busch  Hall,  with  their 
varied  classic  entablatures,  keystones  and 
short,  stubby  pilasters,  or  the  low  en- 
trance towers  with  the  strapwork  balus- 
trade at  the  top,  convince  one  that  their 
designer  was  able  to  handle  a  transitional 
style  with  much  of  the  adroitness  of  the 
original  craftsmen. 

Ridgley  Library,  opposite  University 
Hall,  shows  a  curious  mingling  of  styles. 
Its  prototype,  St.  John's  at  Oxford, 
shows  Italian  rather  than  German  influ- 
ence. The  Oxford  facade  is  entirely  free 
from  all  the  heaviness  of  the  undeveloped 
period  of  German  origin.  The  arcade  on 
the  first  story  is  far  more  Italian  than 
most  of  the  work  of  that  period,  while 
the  small  twin  windows  in  the  second 
story  and  the  crenelated  parapet  are  pure- 
ly Gothic.  The  central  pavilion  of  super- 
posed columns  enclosing  the  niche  on  the 
second  floor  are,  again,  very  Italian. 
While  this  modern  adaptation  of  St. 
John's  is  the  same  facade,  it  is  further 
studied  and  developed.  The  arcade  has 
been  strengthened  ;  the  second-story  win- 
dows are  enlarged  and  "Renaissanced" ; 


•71 


FIREPLACE  IN  READING  ROOM  OF  LIBRARY 
—WASHINGTON  UNIVERSITY,  ST.  LOUIS. 
MO.  COPE  &  STEWARDSON,  ARCHITECTS 


ENTRANCE  TO  CHAPEI^W  ASHING- 
TON  UNIVERSITY,  ST.  LOUIS.  MO. 
COPE  &  STEWARDSON,  ARCHITECTS. 


THE  CHAPEL— WASHINGTON  UNI- 
VERSITY, ST.  LOUIS,  MO.  COPE 
&  STEWARDSON,  ARCHITECTS. 


74 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


the  crenelations  remain  and  the  central 
motive  holds  a  large  mullioned  window 
on  the  second  floor,  while  slender  towers 
are  added  to  the  four  corners  of  the 
building,  recalling  Charlecotte  Manor. 
The  small  details,  such  as  the  band  course 
above  the  arcade,  are  late  Elizabethan. 
Daring  is  this  facade  wherein  three  per- 
iods blend,  a  veritable  tour  de  force,  serv- 
ing likewise  to  unite  the  different  periods 
employed.  The  beautiful  reading  room  is 
in  the  much  later  style  of  Sir  Christopher 
Wren,  whose  small  London  churches  are 
recalled  by  the  exquisitely  modeled  plas- 
ter ceiling. 

This  quadrangle  is  the  center  of  all 
student  life  and  activities.  Here  the 
students  meet  before  going  to  their  lec- 
tures and  here  they  congregate  to  discuss 
the  various  incidents  of  college  life.  An 
ideal  retreat,  this  quadrangle,  where  every 
sound  from  the  outer  world  is  shut  out  by 
the  ivy-clad  walls  or  lost  in  the  depths  of 
the  arcade.  Christ  College  Quadrangle 
at  Oxford,  hallowed  as  it  is  by  centuries, 
and  by  the  names  of  many  of  the  dis- 
tinguished men  of  England,  separated 
from  the  noisy  street  only  by  Tom  Tower, 
cannot  compare  with  this  Quad  at  Wash- 
ington; nor  can  King's  Quad  at  Cam- 
bridge compare  with  it.  We  must  seek 
the  lovely  backs  of  Cambridge,  those  vel- 
vet swards,  those  silent  elms,  those  end- 
less walks — 

"Whenever  free  to  choose 
Did  I  by  night  frequent  the  college  groves 
and  tributary  walks." 

Such  is  the  atmosphere  of  this  quad- 
rangle, an  atmosphere  that  comes  with 
perfect  repose,  produced  by  architecture 
based  on  aesthetic  truths.  We  experience 
this  same  feeling  before  a  Madonna  by 
Raphael  or  a  landscape  by  Constable ;  in 
the  ruined  abbeys  of  England,  or  Nor- 
mandy ;  or  in  the  monasteries  of  North- 
ern Italy.  In  the  early  morning,  before 
the  student  activities  begin,  or  at  evening 
by  twilight  when  we  hear  the  Tower  clock 
strike  out  the  hour,  but  little  imagination 
is  needed  to  carry  us  back  to  the  old 
world. 

Quitting  this  first  quadrangle,  we  pass 
along  the  wing  of  the  Library  and  Eads 
Hall,  buildings  which  form  part  of  the 


enclosure  of  two  future  courts.  Eads 
Hall,  occupied  by  the  Physical  Labora- 
tory, and  Cupples  Hall  No.  2,  occupied 
by  the  Mechanical  Engineering  Depart- 
ment, are  both  splendidly  adapted  to  their 
uses.  They  recall  here  and  there,  in  the 
doorways  and  gables,  the  Elizabethan 
manor  houses,  but  beyond  these  details, 
they  are  nothing  more  than  utilitarian 
buildings,  serving  well  their  purposes. 

From  Eads  Hall  one  passes  down  an 
avenue  of  maples  to  the  chapel  and  the 
men's  dormitories.  The  bijou  of  this 
group  is  the  Graham  Memorial  Chapel,  of 
which  the  general  form  and  main  motives 
are  taken  from  King's  College  Chapel  at 
Cambridge.  The  Graham  Memorial 
Chapel,  scarcely  one-third  the  size  of 
King's  Chapel,  and  with  every  proportion 
greatly  changed,  on  closer  examination 
exhibits  very  little  in  common  with  its 
prototype.  Loftiness  is  the  striking  char- 
acteristic of  King's  College  Chapel,  of 
which  the  end  facades,  very  slender  in 
proportion,  have  almost  an  effect  of  being 
stilted.  The  end  facades  of  the  chapel  at 
Washington  are  open,  perhaps,  to  the 
criticism  of  being  slightly  squatty.  The 
corner  towers,  nearly  identical  with  their 
English  examples,  while  less  slender,  are 
indeed  graceful  and  elegant,  forming  a 
most  delicate  silhouette.  The  side  bays, 
given  over  almost  entirely  to  glass,  add 
the  desired  effect  of  height.  The  glory 
of  the  Cambridge  Chapel  is  its  interior, 
whose  lofty  fan-vaulted  ceiling  has  no 
equal  in  all  England.  The  interior  of  the 
Graham  Memorial  Chapel  bears  no  com- 
parison to  the  English  chapel;  but  it  is. 
nevertheless,  most  successful  and  we  may 
truly  say  that  it  is  "a  thing  of  beauty  and 
a  joy  forever."  Serving  as  a  chapel  in  an 
undenominational  institution,  this  one 
must  forever  want  the  one  central  motive, 
the  heart,  the  spark  to  give  it  life,  the 
centralizing  and  glorifying  motive  of  the 
altar,  without  which  a  Gothic  Church  at 
times  seems  incongruous.  Of  this  chapel, 
Mr.  Cram  would  probably  say,  as  he  does 
of  Trinity  in  Boston,  -'a  church  without  a 
soul."  But  for  all  this,  here  is  a  work 
of  art,  whose  every  detail  is  worthy  of  the 
closest  study,  and  whose  wonderfully 
carved  organ  and  choir  stalls,  roof  trusses 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


75 


and  stained  glass,  are  rarely  met  with  in 
the  modern  work  of  either  America  or 
Europe. 

As  we  leave  the  chapel,  a  broad  walk 
overhung  by  maples  leads  through  two 
groups  of  dormitories.  Only  separate 
buildings  have  thus  far  been  erected,  but 
eventually  they  will  form  sides  of  differ- 
ent courts.  Tower  Hall,  while  medieval 
in  character,  in  its  window  treatment, 
bays  and  oriels,  is  given  a  marked  domes- 
ticity. The  massive  central  tower  over 
the  archway  with  the  smaller  secondary 
tower  mounting  higher,  forms  a  composi- 
tion quite  pleasing.  The  dignified  and 
quiet  facade  of  Liggett  Hall  has  much  of 
the  feeling  of  the  Elizabethan  manor. 
The  varied  bays,  gables,  massive  chim- 
neys and  quaint  doorways  give  interest  to 
a  whole  composed  with  restraint  and  sim- 
plicity. Indeed,  quite  different  are  these 
dormitories  compared  to  those  by  Cope 
and  Stewardson  at  the  University  of 


Pennsylvania.  The  entire  group  at 
Washington  shows  scarcely  as  many  dif- 
ferent motives  or  decorative  details  as 
any  one  building  at  Philadelphia.  Yet 
upon  the  whole  the  balance  of  favor  will 
fall  to  the  lot  of  Washington. 

A  very  considerable  start  has  been 
made  in  the  dormitories  for  women.  Mc- 
Millan Hall  encloses  the  three  sides  of  a 
quadrangle.  While  less  quiet  than  either 
Tower  or  Liggett,  McMillan  Hall  com- 
poses into  more  varied  and  picturesque 
silhouettes. 

If  we  seek  here  for  every  structural 
and  logical  principle  that  dominated 
either  Roman  or  Gothic  art,  we  shall 
be  forced  to  call  these  buildings  of  a  de- 
based style.  But  if  we  seek  honesty  and 
truthfulness  of  construction  we  shall  find 
it  here.  This  work  of  Cope  and  Stew- 
ardson, marked  by  a  strong  personality, 
has  the  stamp  of  the  artist  and  crafts- 
man. 


CUPPLES  HALL  NO.   1. 


KITCHEN  PORCH-HOUSE  OF  WILLIAM 
T.  HARRIS,  ESQ.,  VILLA  NOVA.  PA. 
DUHRING,  OKIE  &  ZIEGLER,  ARCHITECTS 


HOUSE  OF  WILLIAM  T.  HARRIS,  ESQ.,  VILLA  NOVA,  PA. 
Duhring,  Okie  &  Ziegler,  Architects. 

THE  EARLY  PENNSYLVAI 
NLA  COVNTRY  HOVSE 

RESIDENCE  of  WILLIAM  T.  HARRIS!5?! 

'Villa  Nova.     Duhring, Okie  C&  Ziegler,  Architects 
BY    C.  MATLACK   PB.ICE     <^~ 


HOSE  critics  who  are  wont  to  de- 
plore the  absence  of  an  architec- 
ture essentially  American  would, 
perhaps,  come  nearer  to  hitting  their 
mark  if  they  were  to  deplore  more  vigor- 
ously the  over-supply  of  imported  archi- 
tecture which  not  only  retards  the 
ultimate  development  of  American 
architecture  but  also  quite  drowns  out 
such  American  architecture  as  really  does 
exist. 

Not  only  is  there  an  American  archi- 
tecture, but  several  types  of  American 
architecture  quite  distinct  in  their  several 
characteristics  and  in  the  traits 
resultant  from  and  peculiar  to  their 
locale.  We  can  even  afford  to  omit  from 
the  catalogue  that  style  which  is  called 
"Mission"  or  "Californian,"  for  by  the 
time  there  have  been  taken  from  them 


all  traces  of  derivation  either  Spanish  or 
Japanese,  there  remains  little  but  the 
floor  plan. 

Distinctly,  however,  there  are  the  dig- 
nified Classic  Revival  of  the  Southern 
States,  the  severe  type  of  Colonial  of  the 
New  England  States,  and  the  quaint 
Dutch  Colonial  of  certain  parts  of  New 
Jersey  and  New  York,  as  well  as  that 
type  of  Colonial  home  essentially  pecu- 
liar to  Pennsylvania. 

These  different  architectural  expres- 
sions are  certainly  to  be  regarded  as 
logical  national  property,  because  they 
are  fairly  accurate  reflections  of  contem- 
porary and  local  characteristics,  ideas, 
and  ideals. 

The  Southern  mansion,  for  example, 
was  a  reflection  of  the  general  dignity 
and  lordliness  concomitant  with  the  idea 


78 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


of  a  large  slave-holding  estate, 
owned,  for  the  most  part,  by 
direct  descendants  of  English 
nobility,  or  by  noble  colonists 
of  actual  title.  And  these  fine 
gentlemen,  in  building,  very 
naturally  found  architectural 
expression  in  terms  of  the  clas- 
sical tastes  in  contemporary 
culture. 

The  severity  of  the  New 
England  type  was  a  reflection 
of  the  austere  creed  de- 
veloped from  Puritanism ;  the 


SECOND  FLOOR-HOUSE  OF  WILLIAM  T.  HARRIS,  ESQ. 


sturdy  simplicity  of  the  early  Dutch 
farmhouses  was  a  reflection  of  the  rug- 
ged characteristics  of  no  less  rugged 
pioneers ;  and  the  Pennsylvania  type  was 
a  reflection  no  less  true  of  salient  local 
characteristics.  These  houses  of  the 
early  Pennsylvanians-  were  of  two 
kinds,  or  a  blending  of  both.  There  were 
the  sturdy  farmhouses  of  the  simple 
pioneers,  the  more  stately  homes  of  the 
more  aristocratic,  and  the  substantial 
dwellings  of  a  well-bred  "middle  class." 
Here  would  appear  to  be  a  wealth  of 


material  for  our  present  day  architect 
which  should  afford  him  a  considerable 
and  sufficient  range  of  architectural  ex- 
pression. But  this  American  architec- 
ture, taken  collectively,  has  been  put  into 
competition  with  French,  Italian,  English, 
Swiss  and  a  score  of  styles  and  sub-styles 
of  Europe,  so  that,  in  comparison,  it  has 
appeared  to  the  superficial  observer  a 
sorry  enough  affair,  simply  because  most 
of  us  are  not  sufficiently  well  acquainted 
with  it. 

There   is   one   quality   of   inestimable 


HOUSE  OF  WILLIAM  T.  HARRIS,  ESQ.,  VILLA  NOVA.  PA. 
Duhring,  Okie  &  Ziegler,  Architects. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


79 


MAIN  ENTRANCE  AND  ENTRANCE  TO  "DESK  ROOM"— HOUSE  OF  WILLIAM  T.  HARRIS,  ESQ., 

VILLA  NOVA,  PA. 
Duhring.  Okie  &  Ziegler,  Architects. 


value  which  may  be  said  to  be  common  to 
all  the  types  of  American  architecture 
mentioned  above,  and  that  is  the  quality 
of  domesticity,  which  many  more  pre- 
tentious renderings  of  imported  styles 
have  often  failed  to  express.  By  all 
means  domesticity  should  be  reckoned 
the  most  important  quality  which  a  home 
should  possess,  yet  it  is  a  quality  surpris- 
ingly rarely  met  with  in  this  country.  It 
is  not  entirely  remarkable  that  early 
American  architecture  should  have  de- 
veloped the  quality,  and  very  consistently 
expressed  it,  because  early  American 
architecture  came  before  the  day  of  the 
"show  place,"  the  artificial  social  index 
of  the  nouveau  riche,  and  because  the  old 
days  were  days  of  simplicity  and  honesty 
in  such  matters,  when  a  home  was  a 
home,  and  not  an  architectural  advertise- 
ment. 

And  in  the  matter  of  the  ultimate  "ar- 
rival" of  an  American  architecture,  this 
is  an  important  circumstance  to  take  into 
consideration,  because  no  expression  in 
the  arts,  whether  painting,  sculpture,  or 
architecture,  can  ever  attain  significance 
if  it  be  either  an  imitation  or  a  bid  for 


attention.  It  must  be  a  sincere  expression 
of  conviction,  not  only  on  the  part  of  the 
architect,  but  of  the  public,  which  brings 
us  to  the  subject  of  this  article — a  re- 
cently designed  house  at  Villa  Nova,  in 
Pennsylvania,  by  a  Philadelphia  firm 
of  architects. 

The  firm,  Messrs.  Duhring,  Okie  and 
Ziegler,  are  peculiarly  successful  in  that 
they  have  consistently  effected  a  latter- 
day  translation  of  an  early  local  type  of 
house,  without  loss  therein  of  any  of  the 
charm  or  significance  of  the  original,  but 
rather  with  an  added  touch  of  advanced 
architectural  taste  and  ability.  This  has 
been  evidenced  in  much  of  the  previous 
work  of  the  firm,  wherein  a  fine  sym- 
pathy with  the  style  as  it  was  in  early 
times  has  been  combined  with  an  unusual 
ability  to  improve  upon  it  in  many  modern 
details  and  in  a  certain  kind  of  well-bred 
good  taste  which  tells  its  own  story  to 
laymen  no  less  directly  than  to  architect. 

In  developing  the  early  Pennsylvania 
country  house  into  a  modern  dwelling, 
Duhring,  Okie  and  Ziegler  have  made  it 
both  a  home,  livable  and  intimate,  and 
a  more  polished  architectural  expression, 


80 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


OBLIQUE  REAR  VIEW-HOUSE  OF  WILLIAM   T.   HARRIS,   ESQ.,  VILLA  NOVA,  PA. 
Duhring,  Okie  &  Zieglcr,  Architects. 


OBLIQUE  FRONT  VIEW— HOUSE  OF  WILLIAM  T.  HARRIS,  ESQ.,  VILLA  NOVA,  PA. 
Duhring,  Okie  &  Ziegler,  Architects. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


81 


SIDE  VIEW— HOUSE  OF  WILLIAM  T.   HARRIS,   ESQ.,  VILLA  NOVA,   PA. 
Duhring,  Okie  &  Ziegler,  Architects. 


I  which,  logically,  is  exactly  what  should 
Blake  place  in  the  rendering  of  any 
I  adaptation. 

This  house  at  Villa  Nova  is  especially 
I  happy  in  its  setting,  an  old-fashioned 
I  garden — or  if  one  were  to  take  it  the 
I  other  way,  the  charming  garden  is  f or- 
I  tunate  in  that  it  lies  about  so  picturesque 
land  pleasing  a  house — and  here  we  find 
I  the  complementary  relationship  which 
I  should  (but  does  not  always)  exist  be- 
|  tween  architecture  and  gardening,  where- 
in each  gracefully  bows  to  the  other,  as  in 
the  measure  of  an  old  minuet. 

The  plan  is  an  interesting  one,  simple 
yet  diverse,  and  giving  evidence  of  pleas- 
ant rooms  quaintly  disposed  about  a  liv- 
ing porch,  which  recesses  the  "garden 
front"  of  the  house,  and  affords  a  spa- 
cious sleeping  porch  above.  Although  the 
plan  is  not  that  of  a  really  large  house, 
there  is  provided,  between  the  music-room 
and  the  living  room,  a  little  "desk- 
room,"  or  "office,"  which  is  a  very  sen- 
sible feature  of  many  English  country 
n-o 


house  plans,  in  that  it  affords  a  place 
apart  from  the  house,  yet  convenient, 
where  gardeners,  coachmen  and  other 
employes  about  an  estate  may  be  inter- 
viewed or  paid  off  without  encroachment 
upon  privacy. 

Six  bed-rooms,  three  baths,  a  large 
sleeping  porch  and  numerous  closets  make 
an  adequate  arrangement  for  the  second 
floor,  and  complete  a  well-studied  plan. 

The  reserve  with  which  the  detail  of 
the  house  has  been  handled  is  at  once 
characteristic  of  this  firm  of  architects 
and  explanatory  of  its  success  in  render- 
ing modern  versions  of  the  early  Penn- 
sylvania type  of  country  house.  There 
are  few  factors,  but  these  must  be  han- 
dled the  more  skilfully  for  that  reason — 
well-laid  fieldstone,  studied  (yet  appar- 
ently simple)  mouldings,  very  reserved, 
panelled  wooden  shutters,  quaint  hard- 
ware of  the  period — these  are  the  ele- 
ments, governed  generally  by  a  consistent 
simplicity  and  sincerity  of  feeling 
throughout. 


A  HUMOROUS  FOUNTAIN  IN  Ml MC'Ii 
FOR       COMMENT.       SEE       PAGE      ft 


PORTFOLIO      OF 
R.R.ENT    AR.CHIT  E  CTVR.E 


DETAIL  OF  VESTIBULE-ASSEMBLY  TEA  ROOMS. 
BOSTON.  CHARLES  M.  BAKER,  ARCHITECT. 


84 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


THE   ENTRANCE— ASSEMBLY  TEA   ROOMS,   BOSTON. 
Charles  M.  Baker,  Architect. 


o 


Q 


VIEW  SHOWING  PART  OF  LARGE  DINING  ROOM,  TEA  ROOM 
AND   FOUNTAIN-ASSEMBLY  TEA   ROOMS,   BOSTON. 


r 


PLAN  OF  THE  FRANCIS  W.  1'ARKl 
SCHOOL  OF  SAN  DIEGO,  CAL.  W 
TEMPLETON  JOHNSON,  ARCHITEC 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


89 


FRONT   ELEVATION-FRANCIS   W.    PARKER   SCHOOL   OF   SAN   DIEGO. 
Wm.  Templeton  Johnson,  Architect. 


SOUTH  AND  WEST  WINGS— FRANCIS  W.  PARKER  SCHOOL  OF  SAN  DIEGO. 
Wm.  Templeton  Johnson,  Architect. 


90 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


•    ' 


AND  OPEN  CLASSROOMS-FRANCIS  W.  PARKER  SCHOOL  OF  SAN  DIEGO. 
Wm.  Templeton  Johnson,  Architect. 


OPEN  AIR  CLASSROOMS— FRANCIS  W.  PARKER  SCHOOL  OF  SAN  DIEGO. 
Wm.  Templeton  Johnson,  Architect. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


91 


HOUSE  OF  W.   E.   MARBLE,   ESQ.,   GREENWICH,   CONN. 

Rowe  &  Smith,  Architects 


J>E.CO/1D  FLOOR  PL/V1 


THIHD  FLODJ2,  PLAAf 


THE  FLOOR  PLANS-HOUSE  OF  W.  E.  MARBLE,  ESQ.,  GREENWICH,  CONN. 
Rowe  &  Smith,  Architects 


S33 

*       cfl 

w  ci^ 

u  S1* 


. 

H  W  > 
Z  J  O 

W  CQ  « 


T'S   EIBRARX 


TWO  BOOKS  BY  PRACTICAL  THEORISTS 

By  RICHARD  FRANZ  BACH 

Curator,  School  of  Architecture,  Columbia  University 


PART  I. 


A  PRACTICAL  theorist  is  a  useful 
person,  a  helpful  adjunct  to  his 
profession  and  a  mentor  for 
the  tyro.  He  is  in  fact  a  necessity ;  with- 
out his  species  any  profession  may  read- 
ily fall  subject  to  disorganization,  for 
his  method  is  the  method  of  much 
teaching,  combining  practice  with  the 
setting  up  of  resultant  principles.  His 
efficiency  consists  in  his  ability  to  fash- 
ion realities  of  thought  out  of  a  multi- 
tude of  examples,  facts  and  experiences, 
a  process  the  logicians  call  induction. 
His  real  value  lies  in  the  actuality  of  his 
theories,  in  their  present  and  modern 
applicability.  Theoretics  alone  are  but 
mental  gymnastics,  resulting  in  general- 
ities that  glitter  but  are  not  proof  against 
the  stern  truth  of  practice.  But  the 
practical  theorist  possesses  the  salutary 
quality  of  moderation,  of  restraint;  he 
does  not  rush  in  where  the  sedate  prac- 
titioner fears  to  tread,  but  holds  his  fire 
until  experience  has  been  tried  by  time 
and  repetition.  Out  of  this  attitude 
wholesome  theory  may  readily  be 
evolved,  and  such  a  body  of  theory  may 
then  rightly  demand  the  attention  of 


those  who  practice  only  and  never 
preach.  For,  contrary  to  the  time-worn 
maxim,  practice  may  be  relied  upon  to 
make  perfect  only  if  constantly  revised 
and  corrected.  Eminent  among  the  prac- 
tical theorists  are  Mr.  Edwin  Howland 
Blashfield  and  Mr.  Ralph  Adams  Cram. 

In  Mural  Painting  in  America  (Scrib- 
ner's;  8vo;  $2.)  Mr.  Blashfield  has  pub- 
lished, with  many  additions,  the  Scam- 
mon  Lectures  of  two  years  ago,  read  be- 
fore the  Art  Institute  of  Chicago.  We 
have  latterly  grown  accustomed  to  look 
up  to  Mr.  Blashfield  and  to  Mr.  Kenyon 
Cox,  both  painter-writers,  gifted  with 
a  lucid  and  fluent  manner  of  writ- 
ing and 'an  inexhaustible  fund  of  knowl- 
edge and  experience,  as  arbiters  of  stylis- 
tic truth  of  the  present  in  their  impor- 
tant profession  and  sympathetic  inter- 
preters of  the  stylistic  truths  of  the  past. 
Only  recently  Mr.  Cox  published  the 
Scammon  Lectures  for  1911  under  the 
title  The  Classic  Point  of  View;  and  we 
had  been  expecting  the  sequel  to  this 
volume  from  Mr.  Blashfield,  whose  atti- 
tude is  much  the  same,  though  his  angle 
of  vision  mav  be  somewhat  different.  We 


94 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


are  glad  to  find  him  now  expanding  his 
original  series  of  papers  into  a  sizable 
volume,  containing  about  twice  the  quan- 
tity of  the  material  primarily  prepared, 
and  fully  illustrated  with  carefully 
chosen  subjects  representing  all  phases 
of  mural  painting  in  this  country. 

Mr.  Blashfield's  book  gives  us  a  mass 
of  theory  and  of  practice,  a  concise  his- 
torical treatment,  a  discussion  of  meth- 
ods and  results,  a  number  of  anecdotes 
of  men  and  times,  and  a  wealth  of  coun- 
sel between  the  lines,  all  bound  together 
in  one  of  the  most  readable  volumes  that 
has  ever  undertaken  an  exposition  of  this 
little  appreciated  field.  In  his  foreword 
the  author  says:  "Mural  painting  may 
safely  be  called  the  most  exacting,  as  it 
certainly  is  the  most  complicated  form  of 
painting  in  the  whole  range  of  art ;  its 
scope  includes  figure,  landscape  and  por- 
trait ;  its  practice  demands  the  widest 
education,  the  most  varied  forms  of 
knowledge,  the  most  assured  experience. 
Save  by  the  initiated  it  is  apt  to  be  mis- 
apprehended as  a  form  of  art  at  best 
demanding  little  but  arrangement,  fancy, 
lightness  of  hand,  at  worst  as  a  commer- 
cial product  calculable  as  to  its  worth  by 
the  hour  and  the  square  foot."  Let  us 
hope  the  case  for  mural  painting  in 
America  is  not  quite  so  bad  as  that. 

The  scope  of  the  work  is  adequately 
indicated  by  its  analyzed  table  of  con- 
tents, and  its  ultimate  value  might  be  as- 
sured by  any  one  of  the  individual  chap- 
ters included.  So  we  have,  for  instance, 
"The  Importance  of  Decoration,"  subdi- 
vided into  separate  disquisitions  upon 
"the  decorated  building  as  a  teacher" ; 
"the  main  factors  in  our  decorative  tra- 
dition" ;  "the  focal  importance  of  the 
public  building,"  and  "national  art  as  a 
national  asset."  In  similar  manner  each 
chapter  contains  a  series  of  essays  on 
associated  subjects,  grouped  under  a  uni- 
fying major  title. 

Both  Mr.  Blashfield  and  Mr.  Cox  un- 
dertook to  plough  the  same  furrow,  but 
they  began  at  opposite  ends.  Thus  the 
latter  treated  the  classic  spirit  in  art  and 
its  influence  upon  the  art  of  to-day,  both 
"positive  and  potential."  He  devoted 
chapters  to  extended  considerations  of 
subject,  drawing,  color,  etc.  Mr.  Blash- 


field declares  his  purpose  under  the  title : 
"The  Modern  Tendency  in  Art  as  Influ- 
enced by  the  Spirit  of  the  Past." 

The  author  first  brings  together  a 
number  of  substantiating  reasons  why 
the  art  of  mural  painting  should  be  con- 
sidered an  art  of  lasting  significance  and 
national  importance.  He  refers  in  the 
first  place  to  the  past  and  the  influence 
of  painting  and  mosaic  at  a  time  when 
books  were  not  available  as  a  spur  to  the 
intellectual  life  of  the  people.  The 
mural  painting  commemorated  the  na- 
tional hero  or  the  protecting  saint,  the 
local  patron,  in  short,  the  allegory,  the 
history,  the  legend  of  a  given  time  and 
place.  He  who  had  business  in  a  p*ublic 
building,  be  it  church  or  hospital,  weigh- 
house  or  city  hall,  found  there  the  record 
of  deeds  of  a  great  past,  or  the  beauty 
of  a  folk  story,  or  yet  again  the  counsel 
of  a  high  ideal.  The  eye  and  the  ear  are 
both  handmaidens  of  the  mind,  but  the 
mind  reads  more  rapidly  than  the  eye, 
although  the  best  of  rhythm  and  move- 
ment is  conveyed  by  the  ear.  Thus  every 
decorated  structure  teaches,  and,  by 
way  of  corollary,  every  decorated  struc- 
ture should  teach ;  especially  is  this  true 
of  the  public  building,  for  it  is  a  repre- 
sentative structure  ;  it  is  in  a  sense  a  con- 
crete statement  of  the  ambitions  of  a 
number  of  minds  actuated  by  questions 
of  mutual  benefit.  It  is  but  little  recog- 
nized as  yet  in  this  country  that  national 
art  is  a  national  asset. 

Mr.  Blashfield's  pen  flies  from  well- 
moulded  phrase  to  sharp  command ;  he 
advises,  he  relates,  he  depicts.  What- 
ever his  momentary  mood,  through  the 
whole  of  his  fabric  runs  the  golden 
thread  of  love  for  his  art ;  out  of  the 
fullness  of  his  heart  he  gives  his  best 
and  surely  his  earnestness  is  not  with- 
out avail.  We  quote  the  conclusion  of 
his  chapter  on  the  importance  of  decora- 
tion: ". .  and  if  I  had  to  raise  a  statue 
to  the  typical  promoter,  whether  of  mat- 
ters spiritual  or  material,  I  would  make 
him  a  god  Thor,  and  gird  him,  with  his 
weapon  to  hammer,  hammer,  hammer, 
again  and  again  in  the  same  place.  And 
he  would  be  no  serene  god,  .  .  but  a 
striker  of  discords.  First,  and  longest, 
and  hardest,  he  would  smite  in  beating 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


95 


out  from  the  amorphousness  of  our  in- 
difference a  conviction — the  conviction 
of  the  importance  of  public  art — that  it 
should  be  at  least  as  good  as  the  very 
best,  because  placed  the  most  conspicu- 
ously, and  therefore  of  all  art  that  most 
likely  to  impress  and  teach  the  people. 
Next  he  would  have  to  strike  long  and 
hard  in  emphasis  of  the  importance  of 
harmony,  the  mutuality  of  architect, 
sculptor  and  painter  in  any  decorative 
undertaking,  to  strike  until  he  had  weld- 
ed the  three  into  one  ingot  and  fashion 
from  it  a  weapon  ten  times  as  tempered 
to  its  purpose  as  it  ever  could  have  been 
in  the  personality  of  any  one  of  these 
artists  divided  from  their  trinity.  .  . 
The  next  thing  to  be  placed  on  the  anvil 
should  be  fashioned  into  a  symbol  of  the 
importance  of  experience  in  the  decora- 
tive artist.  .  .  .  Experience,  reiter- 
ated and  hard-bought  experience,  is  ab- 
solutely necessary  to  him,  and  in  no  wise 
is  the  lengthening  repetition  of  hammer 
strokes  more  typical  than  it  is  of  this 
continuity  of  effort,  this  long  succession, 
now  of  essay,  now  of  blunder,  now  of 
half-success,  fusing  at  last  into  a  har- 
monious result.  .  .  " 

Sage  counsel  may  be  gathered  from 
the  succeeding  chapters  on  harmony  be- 
tween building  commissioner  and  archi- 
tect, between  building  commissioner  and 
mural  painter,  and  among  mural  painters 
themselves,  not  to  speak  of  mutuality 
between  mural  painter  and  architect.  On 
the  whole  we  like  the  authoritative  char- 
acter of  Mr.  Blashfield's  writing.  If  his 
pen  prods  the  American  appreciation  and 
understanding  of  mural  painting  and  its 
importance  into  activity  and  life,  it  will 
have  done  a  monumental  service.  His 
own  standard  of  excellence  is  high,  but 
it  is  the  measure  of  himself ;  he  is  there- 
fore justified  in  proclaiming  it  as  a  dic- 
tum, with  somewhat  of  a  tone  of  finality 
that  demands  attention.  Indeed,  we 
might  cull  a  number  of  pointed  para- 
graphs from  the  present  volume  and 
bind  them  into  a  useful  manual  for  arch- 
itects and  decorators — and  assuredly  for 
the  public. 

The  poor  building  commissioner  is 
shorn  of  every  shred.  Artistic  sense  he 


has  none.  "The  building  commissioner 
thoroughly  understands  the  man  who 
puts  in  the  wires  for  the  lighting,  but  the 
artist  and  he  speak  different  languages." 
We  would  like  to  go  on  at  greater  length 
to  indicate  the  chief  points  of  Mr.  Blash- 
field's other  sub-headings  in  this  second 
chapter,  e.  g.,  the  selection  of  the  artist, 
competition  vs.  appointment,  and  finally 
the  control  of  the  architect.  The  apoth- 
eosis of  the  architect  follows:  "Histori- 
ans of  art  have  celebrated  the  many- 
sidedness  of  the  Renaissance  architect, 
who  could  build  domes  and  paint  minia- 
tures, play  the  lute  and  write  sonnets, 
carve  intagli  and  colossi ;  but  even  of 
them  we  may  believe  were  hardly  ex- 
acted more  kinds  of  knowledge  than  of 
the  modern  architect."  And  again  under 
the  topic  "mutuality  between  architect 
and  mural  painter"  we  come  upon  these 
significant  words :  "In  the  effort  toward 
mutuality,  vital  to  the  success  of  any 
great  enterprise  in  decoration,  the  archi- 
tect is  then  essentially  the  head  and  com- 
mander-in-chief.  He  designs  the  build- 
ing and  assigns  to  each  sculptor  and 
painter  his  place  in  it.  But  if  this  is  his 
unquestionable  right,  it  is  also  his  privi- 
lege to  expect  and  to  receive  authorita- 
tive assistance  from  both  sculptor  and 
painter,  not  only  as  their  work  pro- 
gresses, but  even  before  it  begins.  In  a 
general  way  he,  the  architect,  knows  be- 
forehand what  manner  of  man  is  suited 
to  some  special  work,  but  in  a  particular 
way  that  man,  once  selected,  knows  in 
turn  how  to  fit  his  own  temperament  to 
that  work  and  how  he  may  best  suggest 
amplification  of  elaboration  of  it." 

Later  on  the  mural  painters  them- 
selves are  taught  to  be  good  yoke-fel- 
'lows,  working  harmoniously  and  with 
self-sacrifice  at  the  exacting  task  of  col- 
laboration. But  we  have  not  space  to 
discuss  all  the  excellent  features  of  this 
fine  volume.  It  will  prove  a  Poor  Rich- 
ard's Almanack  for  painter  and  archi- 
tect, if  not  indirectly  for  the  sculptor. 
The  public  at  large  should  have  it  by 
heart,  for  it  contains  the  whole  theory 
and  correct  practice  of  mural  painting, 
the  most  important  educational  factor  of 
modern  building. 


NOTES 

AND 
COMMENTS 


One       of      the       most 
charming  pieces  of  con- 
A  Humorous       temporary  sculpture  that 
Fountain  in       has  ucome  ,to  . our   notice 
Munich.          !s.  the,  llttle   fountain   in 
Munich     given     by     the 
sculptor,     Gasteiger,     to 
the   city,  and   erected   in 
the   Karlsplatz,  on  the  site  of  a  portion  of 
the  old  city  wall.    (See  page  82.)    This    amus- 
ing conception,  placed  in  a  secluded  part  of 
the  square,  and  surrounded  by  planting,  is 
altogether  free  from  the  heaviness  that  char- 
acterizes the  greater  part  of  recent  German 
sculpture.     The    figures   are    skilfully    mod- 
eled, and  the  spirit  of  the  whole  composi- 
tion  is   full   of   the   gayety   that   permeates 
the  gargoyles  of  the  Gothic  cathedrals  and 
the    pastorals    of    the    eighteenth    century, 
and   that   is   so  rarely   found   in   the   monu- 
mental sculpture  of  the  present  time,  either 
in  Europe  or  America.     It  is,  in  fact,  typical 
of  the  city  of  Munich,  the  one  place  in  Ger- 
many    which,     despite     the     archaeological 
monstrosities  imposed  on  it  by  some  of  its 
rulers  during  the  past   hundred   years,  has 
preserved    a    great    measure    of    the    spirit 
of    the    middle    ages,    that    spirit    of    sim- 
plicity and  good-fellowship  that  is  now  so 
rare. 


The    Francis    W.    Par- 
ker   School    of    San    Di- 
A  New  Type        ego,    designed    by    Wm. 
of  Open-Air        Templeton   Johnson   and 
School.  illustrated    elsewhere    in 

this  number,  is  believed 
to  be  the  first  school  in 
the  United  States  for 
which  folding  sliding-doors  have  been  used 
in  making  the  building  an  "open-air" 
school.  By  arranging  the  rooms  in  the  way 
adopted  and  planning  the  school  as  a  quad- 
rangle, the  students  are  protected  from 
wind  currents,  and  yet  at  the  same  time 
have  as  fresh  air  in  the  classrooms  as  there 
is  out  of  doors.  It  was  found  last  winter 
that  only  on  two  days  during  the  whole 


winter  the  doors  had  to  be  closed,  and  even 
then  the  ventilation  in  the  rooms  was  as 
good  as  that  in  the  ordinary  school  build- 
ing, as  there  are  transoms  above  the  out- 
side windows  and  above  the  folding  doors 
as  well.  A  little  more  than  two  wings  of 
the  finished  plan  have  already  been  com- 
pleted, and  a  beginning  has  been  made  in 
the  work  of  planting  the  interior  court  with 
California  wild  flowers  and  shrubs. 

In  a  letter,  from  which  we  take  the  lib- 
erty of  quoting,  Mr.  Johnson  writes  : 

"Climatic  conditions  in  Southern  California 
are  exceptionally  good  for  the  use  of  open- 
air  school  buildings.  Before  coming  to  Cal- 
ifornia two  years  ago,  I  had  offices  with  my 
cousin,  Mr.  Warrington  G.  Lawrence,  in  the 
Brunswick  Building,  and  when  I  told  him 
that  the  climate  of  San  Diego  is  so  mild  that 
most  people  have  no  artificial  heat  in  their 
houses,  yet  so  cool  that  the  majority  of  them 
do  not  use  any  ice,  and  that  there  is  so  much 
sunshine  that  people  use  what  are  known  as 
solar  heaters,  which  automatically  employ 
the  sun's  rays  to  manufacture  the  household 
hot  water  supply,  he  naturally  thought  I  was 
lying;  but  such  are  the  facts." 

The  Francis  W.  Parker  School  of  San  Di- 
ego is  modeled,  as  to  educational  principles, 
after  the  school  of  the  same  name  in  Chi- 
cago, founded  in  honor  of  Col.  Francis  W 
Parker,  noted  for  his  work  in  connection 
with  the  schools  of  Cook  County,  111.;  and  is 
financed  by  people  interested  in  progressive 
educational  methods.  The  building  is  being 
erected  on  the  multiple  unit  plan.  When 
entirely  completed  it  will  form  a  hollow 
square  with  an  open  court  about  a  hundred 
feet  square  in  the  center,  surrounded  on  all 
sides  by  a  covered  portico.  All  the  class 
rooms  open  on  this  portico,  and  their  inner 
walls  are  arranged  with  folding  sliding- 
doors,  by  means  of  whicH  the  rooms  may 
be  thrown  completely  open  on  the  portico. 
Both  the  folding  doors  and  the  wide 
French  windows  which  glaze  the  outer  walls 
have  transoms  above  them.  The  classrooms 
Have  small  wood  stoves,  which  are  used  on 
wet  days. 


ARCHITECTVRAL 


f'i 


35'  a  Copy  ~  Published  in  JYew  York~$3°-?aYear 


QUALITY  PIPE 


Architects  when  writing  their  specifications 
mention  only  that  material  which  will  meet 
their  every  demand. 

In  "YOUNGSTOWN"  STEEL  PIPE  and 
"YOUXGSTOWN  STAR  BRAND"  GENU- 
IXE  WROUGHT  IRON  PIPE  you  will  find 
those  qualities  which  only  can  he  produced 
by  proper  selection  of  raw  materials,  expe- 
rience and  facilities  for  manufacture. 

"YOUNGSTOWN"  pipe,  both  steel  and 
wrought  iron,  are  quality  products  in  every 
respect. 


THE  YOUNGSTOWN  SHEET  AND  TUBE  Co 


YOUNGSTOWN.  OHIO 


_T 


fti 


VOL.  XXXVIL     No.  2 


FEBRUARY,  1915 


SERIAL  NO.  197 


THE 

ARCHITECTVRAl^l 
RECORD 


**> 


CONTENTS 


COVER— The  Klingentor,  Rothenberg. 

Water  Color  Drawing  by  Walter  S.  Schneider. 

SOME  REGENT  BANK  PLANS:     The  Work  of  Thomas  Bruce  Boyd 
By  John  J.  Klaber 

THE  JOHN  C.  PROCTOR  RECREATION  CENTER,  Peoria,  III.    Hewitt  & 

Emerson,  Architects  "•*.*- 

THE  MONTREAL  ART  GALLERY.    E.  &  W.  S.  Maxwell,  Architects 

By  Thomas  W.  Ludlow,  Associate  Professor  of  Architecture,  McGill  University 

THE  ARCHITECT'S  PART  IN  THE  WORLD'S  WORK      * 

By  Frederick  L.  Ackerman 

.THREE  TYPES  OF  GEORGIAN.    Part II 

By  Harold  Donaldson  Eberlein 

Measured  Drawings  by  Donald  Millar  and  others 

;  SOME  REGENT  INTERIORS  BY  THORNTON  CHARD    .- 

THE  ARCHITECT'S  LIBRARY:  Books  by  Practical  Theorists.     Part  II  - 
By  Richard  F.  Bach 

NOTES  AND  COMMENTS     -  •- 


Page 

97 

116 
132 

149 
159 

177 
187 

191 


Editor-.  MICHAEL  A.  MIKKELSEN. 

Yearly  Subscription— United  States  $3.00 
— Foreign  $4.00 — Single  Copies   35  cents 


Contributing  Editor :    HERBERT  D.  CROLY 


Advertising  Manager:   AUSTIN  L.  BLACK 

Entered  May  22.    1902.   as  Second 
Class    Matter,  at  New  York.    N.  Y. 


Copyright   1915  by  The  Architectural 
Record  Company — All  Rights  Reserved 


PUBLISHED    MONTHLY    BY 

THE  ARCHITECTURAL  RECORD  COMPANY 


115-119  WEST  FORTIETH  STREET.  NEW  YORK 


F.  W.    DODGE,   President 


F.   T.   MILLER,   Secretary  and  Treasurer 


DOORWAY  IN  BANKING   ROOM-BANKING .HOUSE 
OF     T      P      MORGAN     &    CO.,     NEW    YORK    < 
?ROWBRIDGE       &       LIVINGSTON,       ARCHITECTS. 


THE 

ARCHITECTVRAL 
RECORD 


FEBRVARY,  1915 


VOLVME  XXXVII 


NVMBER  II 


SOME  RECENT  BANK  PLANS 
**  WORK  °f  THOMAS  Bk.VCE'BOYD 


THE  planning  of  a  large  banking 
institution  is  a  task  for  which  nei- 
ther the  average  banker  nor  the 
average  architect  is  particularly  well  fit- 
ted. The  banker  lacks  knowledge  of 
building,  has  difficulty  in  reading  plans, 
and  is  usually  too  busy  to  enter  into  the 
mass  of  detail  necessary  to  an  efficient 
plan.  The  architect,  on  the  other  hand, 
is  not  sufficiently  familiar  with  bank  ad- 
ministration, and  cannot  give  the  prob- 
lem the  time  necessary  for  an  adequate 
study  of  all  the  factors  involved.  In  the 
smaller  installations,  and  with  a  small 
architectural  practice,  it  is  true,  the  prob- 
lems are  sufficiently  simple  so  that  the 
architect  has  time  to  solve  them  himself, 
but  as  the  difficulties  multiply,  and  the 
architect's  time  is  more  and  more  occu- 
pied by  the  complexity  of  the  organiza- 
tion under  his  command,  the  need  of  a 
new  method  of  attacking  problems  of 
this  nature  becomes  increasingly  appar- 
ent. It  is  this  state  of  affairs,  existing 


particularly  in  New  York  City,  that  has 
given  rise  to  the  new  profession  of  the 
bank  specialist. 

The  specialist  does  not,  and  in  fact 
cannot,  replace  the  architect,  for  in  so 
doing  he  would  become  an  architect  him- 
self. His  function  is,  either  as  a  consult- 
ing expert  or  as  an  outside  adviser,  to 
collaborate  with  the  banker  and  the  archi- 
tect in  forming  an  efficient  layout,  de- 
termined by  the  special  requirements  of 
the  institution,  and  co-ordinated  with  the 
constructive  necessities  of  the  building. 

Mr.  Thomas  Bruce  Boyd  has  chosen  to 
devote  himself  to  this  particular  phase 
of  the  great  efficiency  movement  of  the 
present  generation,  and  has  collaborated 
in  the  planning  of  many  of  the  largest 
banks  of  recent  date,  as  well  as  in  some 
commercial  institutions  of  other  kinds. 
It  has  been  his  aim  to  secure  the  greatest 
efficiency  with  the  space  available  and 
for  the  purposes  required,  to  save  for  the 
banker  both  in  initial  cost  of  equipment 


98 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


First  Floor  Plan. 


Basement  Floor  Plan. 


THE  CHASE  NATIONAL  BANK,  NEW   YORK 
CITY.  KIMBALL  &  ROOSA,  ARCHITECTS. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


99 


and  in  time  and  expense  of  future  opera- 
tion; in  short,  to  raise  the  standard  of 
bank  planning  to  a  point  of  scientific  per- 
fection not  previously  attained.  The  de- 
gree of  his  success  can  best  be  shown  by 
a  description  of  a  few  of  the  installations 
for  which  he  is  responsible. 

One  of  the  newest  and  most  important 
of.  the  bank  plans  in  which  Mr.  Boyd  has 
collaborated  is  the  Chase  National  Bank, 
in  the  new  Adams  Building,  of  which 
Messrs.  Kimball  and  Roosa  were  the 
architects.  This  vast  interior,  two  hun- 
dred feet  long  and  seventy  feet  wide,  has 
been  laid  out  with  a  view  to  the  maxi- 
mum efficiency.  Entering  from  Broad- 
way, one  finds,  directly  on  the  left,  a 
large  platform  with  the  desks  of  the 
bank's  officers,  the  more  important  of 
whom  have  additional  private  offices  ad- 
joining, along  Exchange  Alley  on  the 
side  of  the  building.  The  grouping  of 
the  officers'  desks  in  an  accessible  loca- 
tion near  the  entrance  is  a  feature  on 
which  Mr.  Boyd  lays  much  stress,  as  he 
considers  it  of  great  importance  in 
maintainng  and  establishing  a  friendly 
relation  between  the  bank  and  its  cus- 
tomers. 

Beyond  the  officers'  space  we  find  the 
loan  department,  sheltered  by  the  cus- 
tomary screen,  and  in  a  corner  near  the 
officers  the  telephone  switchboard,  along- 
side which  a  corridor  runs  from  the  offi- 
cers' desks  to  a  conference  room  for 
their  use,  lighted  also  from  Exchange 
Alley.  From  the  loan  department  a  lift, 
centrally  located,  descends  to  the  base- 
ment, which  is  also  reached  by  stairs  con- 
venient to  the  private  offices.  Beyond 
the  loan  department  are  the  credit  and 
foreign  exchange  departments,  the  tell- 
ers, auditors,  and  other  employees  who 
handle  currency,  and  in  the  extreme  rear,' 
on  Trinity  Place,  the  stenographers  and 
book-keepers.  A  second  lift,  near  the 
tellers,  leads  also  to  the  basement,  as  does 
an  additional  stairway  near  the  chief 
clerk's  office. 

The  public  space,  narrow  as  it  appears 
on  the  plan,  is  in  reality  not  less  than 
fourteen  feet  wide,  and  its  apparent  nar- 
rowness is  due  to  its  great  length,  nearly 
one  hundred  and  sixty  feet.  Along  one 


side  runs  the  screen  with  its  many  win- 
dows, while  on  the  other  check  desks  are 
arranged  in  the  intervals  between  the 
structural  columns.  While  the  propor- 
tions of  the  space  are  not  particularly 
fortunate,  it  is  scarcely  possible  to  im- 
agine a  way  in  which  any  real  improve- 
ment could  have  been  effected,  in  view 
of  the  shape  of  the  ground  and  the  neces- 
sity of  an  entrance  from  Broadway,  the 
narrowness  of  Exchange  Alley  making  it 
almost  vabeless  as  a  thoroughfare,  and 
certainly  quite  impossible  for  the  main 
entrance  of  a  great  banking  institution. 

The  basement  of  the  Chase  National 
Bank  is  used  mainly  for  storage  pur- 
poses. In  the  center  is  the  vault,  divided 
by  a  light  screen  into  two  independent 
parts.  The  larger  part,  used  for  securi- 
ties, is  reached  by  the  lift  from  the  loan 
department,  through  an  examination 
space,  while  the  other  portion,  used  for 
currency,  is  similarly  reached  by  the  sec- 
ond lift.  The  vault  is  closed  by  two 
heavy  doors  at  each  end,  and  a  narrow 
observation  gallery  protects  it  at  the 
side. 

Near  the  vault  are  lockers,  and  storage 
for  stationery  and  filing.  The  locker 
room  gives  access  to  the  clerks'  dining- 
room,  next  to  which  is  a  pantry,  into 
which  the  food,  cooked  by  an  outside 
caterer,  is  brought  by  a  separate  entrance. 
The  same  pantry  is  used  to  supply  the 
officers'  dining-room,  as  well  as  a  smaller 
private  dining-room  used  occasionally  by 
the  president  of  the  bank.  The  directors' 
room,  adjoining  the  officers'  dining-room, 
is  entirely  separated  from  it,  and  is 
reached  directly  by  the  stairs  from  the 
officers'  space  on  the  main  floor. 

Back  of  the  vault,  on  the  same  floor 
level,  are  the  mail  and  check  clerks,  and 
the  messengers.  Here  also  is  the  book 
vault,  to  "which  the  second  lift  and  the 
stairs  give  convenient  access,  and  a  ca- 
pacious toilet  room.  The  level  of  Trin- 
ity Place  is  about  ten  feet  below  that  of 
Broadway,  so  that  the  basement  win- 
dows at  this  end  are  above  grade,  and 
the  lighting  is  far  superior  to  that  of  an 
ordinary  basement. 

Without  attempting,  in  this  brief  out- 
line, to  describe  in  detail  the  planning  of 


100 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


BANKING  ROOM-CHASE  NATIONAL  BANK,  NEW  YORK  CITY. 
Kimball   &  Roosa,  Architects. 


BANKING  ROOM— CHASE  NATIONAL  BANK,  NEW  YORK  CITY. 
Kimball  &  Roosa,  Architects. 


BANKING  ROOM— CHASE  NATIONAL 
BANK,  NEW  YORK  CITY— KIM- 
BALL  &  ROOSA,  ARCHITECTS. 


102 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


the  various  departments  and  their  rela- 
tion to  each  other,  a  few  salient  points 
may  be  noted.  One  of  these  is  the  ar- 
rangement of  the  working  spaces  so  as 
to  gain  the  greatest  possible  use  of  the 
natural  lighting  facilities,  while  the 
vault,  the  public  space,  and  other  parts 
requiring  only  artificial  light  were 
grouped  in  the  center  of  the  plan.  An- 
other interesting  feature  is  the  arrange- 
ment of  the  lifts,  by  which  all  the  depart- 
ments on  both  floors  are  placed  in  easy 
communication,  and  which  greatly  in- 
crease the  working  efficiency  of  the  bank. 
In  this  building,  as  in  Mr.  Boyd's  other 
plans,  the  idea  of  unit  construction  has 
been  used  wherever  practicable.  The  fix- 
tures have  been  made  of  standard  sizes, 
with  interchangeable  bases,  allowing  de- 
partments to  expand  or  to  be  shifted  in 
location  with  the  minimum  of  inconveni- 
ence and  expense.  This  is  a  feature  fre- 
quently lost  sight  of  in  business  installa- 
tions, where  inferior  fittings  are  often 
used  because  of  a  slightly  reduced  orig- 
inal outlay,  which  may  later  be  expended 
several  times  over  because  of  necessary 
changes  that  could  not  be  foreseen  when 
the  original  arrangement  was  planned. 

The  architectural  treatment  of  the 
banking  room  is  comparatively  simple,  as 
the  bank  occupies  part  of  an  office  build- 
ing, rather  than  one  designed  specially 
for  its  use.  A  richly  coffered  plaster  ceil- 
ing is  the  principal  feature  of  interest. 
Apart  from  this  there  is  little  architec- 
tural elaboration,  except  for  the  marble 
casing  of  the  walls  and  columns,  and  the 
carved  counter  screen. 

A  far  more  finished  interior  is  that 
of  the  Guaranty  Trust  Comoany,  of 
which  Messrs.  York  and  Sawyer  were 
the  architects,  with  the  assistance  of  Mr. 
Boyd  for  the  planning  and  equipment. 
This  institution  occupies  a  building  of 
its  own,  at  the  southeast  corner  of  Lib- 
erty Street  and  Broadway,  the  main  en- 
trance being,  of  course,  on  the  latter 
thoroughfare.  The  banking  room  is  in- 
dicated on  the  exterior  by  a  large  order 
of  columns,  on  both  fronts,  those  on  the 
Broadway  front  forming  a  shallow  por- 
tico, while  on  the  Libertv  Street  side  the 
columns  are  engaged.  Above  this  order 
a  pilaster  treatment  is  used  for  the  por- 


tion of  the  building  containing  offices,  but 
this  is  subordinated  to  the  banking  room, 
which  is  clearly  indicated  as  the  main 
feature  of  the  building. 

The  exterior  is  of  a  light  gray  granite, 
and  the  restrained  treatment  of  the  dec- 
oration results  naturally  from  the  refrac- 
tory nature  of  this  material.  The  Ionic 
order  used  is  simply  handled,  and  the 
manner  in  which  it  is  inserted  in  the 
wall,  showing  clearly  that  it  is  to  be  con- 
sidered as  a  decorative  feature  without 
structural  significance,  is  decidedly  sug- 
gestive. The  pilaster  order  above  is  also 
of  interest,  for  while  it  is  Ionic  by  its 
proportions  and  general  treatment,  the 
capitals,  in  some  respects,  suggest  rather 
the  Corinthian. 

In  the  interior  of  the  main  banking 
room  the  treatment  is  lighter,  due  to  the 
employment  of  marble  in  the  place  of 
granite.  The  floor  is  of  light  gray  Knox- 
ville,  with  mosaic  inlays  whose  design 
suggests  a  Pompeian  influence,  which  is 
to  be  detected  also  in  the  Corinthian  col- 
umns, whose  capitals  are  of  a  type  fre- 
quent in  Pompeii,  although  the  best- 
known  example  is  that  of  the  Temple  of 
Vesta  at  Tivoli.  The  treatment  of  the 
acanthus  leaves,  however,  is  decidedly 
different  from  that  of  the  ancient  ex- 
amples. These  columns  are  of  Haute- 
ville  marble,  with  an  entablature  imi- 
tating the  same  material.  The 'walls  and 
counters  are  also  of  Hauteville,  and  the 
warm  buff  color  of  this  material  gives  a 
more  friendly  character  to  the  monu- 
mental treatment  of  the  architecture. 
The  ceiling  is  in  plaster  of  a  lighter  tone, 
with  touches  of  brighter  color,  and  the 
grilles  of  gold  bronze.  « 

All  the  interior  treatment  is  most 
sumptuous  in  character,  and  the  casual 
visitor  canot  fail  to  be  impressed  with 
the  wealth  of  the  institution  that  it 
houses.  The  architects  have  inspired 
themselves  from  many  sources.  Besides 
the  Pompeian  suggestion,  we  find  Roman 
motives  in  the  frieze  above  the  columns, 
Italian  Renaissance  details  in  the  metal 
grilles,  while  Greek  coins  have  furnished 
the  subjects  for  the  carved  medallions  on 
the  main  counter.  All  these  elements 
have  been  handled  by  the  architects  with 
the  ability  that  has  so  long  characterized 


BANKING  HOUSE  OF  THE  GUARANTY 
TRUST  COMPANY,  NEW  YORK  CITY. 
YORK  &  SAWYER,  ARCHITECTS. 


104 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


THE  ARCHITECTURAL  RECORD. 


105 


BANKING  ROOM— GUARANTY  TRUST  COMPANY,  NEW  YORK  CITY. 
York  &  Sawyer,  Architects. 


them,  the  whole  forming  a  remarkably 
rich  and  harmonious  ensemble. 

The  firm  of  York  and  Sawyer  have  been 
known  for  years  as  bank  architects, 
though  this  is  but  one  phase  of  their 
work.  They  have  probably  produced 
more  banks  than  any  other  architects, 
either  American  or  foreign,  and  one 
would  have  expected  them  long  since  to 
have  exhausted  all  the  possible  types  of 
bank  plans.  One  is  therefore  agreeably 
surprised  to  find  in  the  Guaranty  Trust 
Company  a  type  that  is  altogether  new 
in  its  arrangement. 

The  most  striking  characteristic  of  the 
plan  is  its  openness.  While  the  total 
width  of  the  interior  is  over  eighty  feet, 
and  its  length  about  one  hundred  and 
twenty,  with  a  ceiling  height  of  not  less 
than  fifty  feet,  the  space  enclosed  by  the 
bronze  grille  is  only  thirty  feet  bv  fifty. 
This  unusual  proportion  is  due  to  the 
great  development  of  the  officers'  space, 
and  the  relegation  to  other  floors  of  a 
great  part  of  the  bank's  functions.  The 
officers  occupy  the  front  part  of  the  cen- 


tral island,  as  well  as  the  two  platforms 
at  the  sides,  behind  the  columns,  and 
these  spaces  are  quite  open,  being  sur- 
rounded only  by  a  low  marble  balustrade, 
the  only  exception  being  the  conference 
room  at  the  rear  end  of  the  platform  on 
the  right,  which  is  enclosed  by  a  grille 
similar  to  that  of  the  central  working 
space.  The  pylon  on  the  left  contains 
the  president's  private  office,  as  well  as 
an  elevator  and  some  minor  conveni- 
ences ;  that  on  the  right  contains  similar 
accommodation  for  the  vice-president, 
though  his  office  is  reduced  in  size  by  the 
introduction  of  a  staircase,  thus  preserv- 
ing due  hierarchic  proportion. 

The  rear  portion  of  the  central  island, 
enclosed  by  a  bronze  screen,  contains  the 
working  space  for  the  money-handling 
departments  that  come  in  most  direct 
contact  with  the  public.  Here  are  the 
paying  and  receiving  tellers,  as  well  as 
the  collection  and  loan  departments. 
The  coin  lift,  situated  near  the  center  of 
the  island,  communicates  with  the  vaults 
in  the  underground  stories,  rendering 


106 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


FIRST  FLOOR  PLAN-GUARANTY 
TRUST  COMPANY,  NEW  YORK  CITY. 
YORK  &  SAWYER,  ARCHITECTS. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


107 


COUPON    DEPARTMENT 

noooo 


EtqiSTltATION  AND  STOCK.  CQQK.K.tgfrEK.5 


SECOND  FLOOR  PLAN-GUARANTY 
TRUST  COMPANY,  NEW  YORK  CITY. 
YORK  &  SAWYER,  ARCHITECTS. 


108 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


BASEMENT  FLOOR  PLAN— GUARANTY 
TRUST  COMPANY,  NEW  YORK  CITY. 
YORK  &  SAWYER,  ARCHITECTS. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


109 


SUB-BASEMENT  FLOOR  PLAN— GUAR- 
ANTY TRUST  COMPANY,  NEW  YORK 
CITY.  YORK  &  SAWYER,  ARCHITECTS. 


110 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


DETAIL  OF  BRONZE  SCREEN-BANKING  ROOM.  GUARANTY  TRUST  CO.,  NEW  YORK  CITY. 

York  &  Sawyer,  Architects. 


them  easily  accessible  to  all  the  services 
here  grouped  together.  In  the  extreme 
rear  of  the  foor,  separated  only  by  a  bal- 
ustrade from  the  public  space,  we  find 
the  bond  department,  portions  of  which, 
however,  are  enclosed  for  greater  privacy 
by  a  light  screen  which  scarcely  counts 
in  the  general  effect  of  the  room. 

In  the  height  of  the  main  banking 
room,  though  not  visible  from  it,  three 
mezzanine  floors  have  been  arranged. 
The  lower  two  are  unimportant,  being 
contained  entirely  in  the  corner  pylons, 
but  the  third  is  far  more  extensive,  being 
continued  around  three  sides  of  the  main 
room.  It  contains  space  for  files  and 
archives,  as  well  as  a  large  office  for 
stenographers,  and  is  reached  by  two 
stairs  and  three  elevators.  This  mezza- 
nine is  contained  in  the  height  of  the 
entablature,  the  central  part  of  the  bank- 
ing room  having  a  full  entablature,  while 
the  aisles  are  ceiled  at  a  lower  level,  the 
difference  being  sufficient  for  a  working 
story. 

Below  the  main  floor  is  a  basement  ex- 


tending under  the  entire  building,  only  a 
small  part  of  which  is  accessible  to  the 
public.  Here  we  find  the  securities  de- 
partment, in  the  extreme  rear,  and  near 
it  the  purchasing  agent,  the  messengers, 
and  the  Lamson  tube  and  mailing  de- 
partment. The  tube  system  is  of  great 
importance,  as  it  joins  widely  separated 
portions  of  the  building,  and  greatly  fa- 
cilitates intercommunication  between  the 
different  departments. 

The  basement  contains  also  locker 
rooms,  machinery  rooms,  and  the  like,  as 
well  as  the  vault,  whose  principal  means 
of  access  is  the  coin  lift  from  the  center 
of  the  main  banking  room.  This  vault 
has  walls  two  feet  thick,  and  is  sur- 
rounded by  an  observation  passaee,  from 
which  all  sides  of  the  exterior  are  visible. 
Near  its  entrance  is  an  examination  room. 
The  interior  of  the  vault  is  divided  into 
separate  compartments  for  the  different 
parts  of  the  bank.  The  sub-basement 
contains  a  similar  vault,  also  divided  into 
compartments,  each  of  which  forms  a 
smaller  vault  independent  of  the  others. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


Ill 


BANKING  HOUSE  OF  J.  P,  MORGAN  &  CO.,  NEW  YORK  CITY. 
Trowbridge  &  Livingston,  Architects. 


In  the  upper  stories  the  functions  of 
the  bank  are  continued.  The  second 
story  contains  board  and  conference 
rooms,  arranged  as  a  separate  unit,  and 
reached  by  the  elevator  next  to  the  presi- 
dent's office.  This  floor  also  contains  the 
coupon  department,  foreign  department, 
and  bookkeeping  department,  as  well  as 
some  others  of  less  importance,  com- 
municating with  the  public  space,  reached 
by  the  Liberty  Street  elevator.  Adjacent 
to  these  is  the  auditing  department,  in  a 
more  secluded  location,  and  served  frr  the 
elevator  on  the  vice-president's  side. 

The  third  story  contains  the  title  de- 
partment, and  the  remaining  floors  are 
partly  occupied  by  the  bank,  and  partly 
destined  for  its  future  expansion,  but 
meanwhile  leased  as  offices.  Among  the 
services  housed  here  are  the  bond  de- 


partment, telegraphs  and  telephones, 
kitchens  and  dining-rooms  for  the  use  of 
the  staff,  machinery,  and  a  special  print- 
ing office. 

Throughout  the  equipment  of  the 
Guaranty  Trust  Company  the  same  spirit 
of  thoroughness  is  to  be  noticed.  Noth- 
ing seems  to  be  overlooked.  The  fixtures 
are  planned  with  the  greatest  care,  every 
department  having  such  special  fixtures 
as  are  necessary  to  its  highest  efficiency. 
That  the  basements  are  artificially  ven- 
tilated goes  without  saying,  but  the  use 
of  this  system  in  the  main  banking  room 
is  less  evident,  the  openings  to  the  ven- 
tilating ducts  being  hidden  by  the  mould- 
ings of  the  architrave  above  the  columns. 
It  is  regrettable  that  the  reduction  neces- 
sary in  making  the  plans  available  for 
magazine  reproduction  precludes  the 


112 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


BANKING  ROOM-J.   P.  MORGAN  &  CO.,  NEW  YORK  CITY. 
Trowbridge  &  Livingston,  Architects. 


showing  of  the  details  of  the  equipment, 
as  these  are  scarcely  less  interesting  than 
the  general  disposition  of  the  layout. 

Another  recent  work  of  unquestioned 
interest,  in  which  Mr.  Boyd  collaborated, 
is  the  banking  house  of  J.  P.  Morgan  & 
Co.,  at  the  corner  of  Broad  and  Wall 
Streets.  The  problem  here  presented 
was  very  different,  and,  in  some  respects, 
simpler  than  those  discussed  above,  be- 
cause of  the  lesser  number  of  banking 
functions  to  be  taken  into  account.  On 
the  other  hand,  the  architects,  Messrs. 
Trowbridge  and  Livingston,  found  them- 
selves confronted  with  a  problem  of  some 
difficulty  in  view  of  the  peculiar  form  of 
the  plot,  and  of  the  desire  to  make  the 
banking  room  as  large  as  possible,  with- 
out any  intermediate  supports.  In  fact, 
as  executed,  this  room  includes  the  entire 
area  of  the  plot,  except  a  small  space  at 
the  rear,  in  which  stairs,  elevators,  and 
the  correspondence  department  are  in- 
cluded, and  a  still  smaller  space  at  the 
front,  with  the  entrance  lobby.  The  ir- 
regular form  of  this  large  room  has  been 


disguised  by  a  very  ingenious  treatment, 
all  the  more  interesting  because  of  the 
comparative  rarity  of  such  problems  in 
our  American  work,  and  the  small  num- 
ber of  precedents  to  be  found  for  them. 
The  entrance  to  the  building  is  placed 
at  the  truncated  angle  of  the  two  streets, 
a  location  all  the  more  commendable  be- 
cause this  corner,  if  not  cut  off,  would 
have  been  unpleasantly  acute.  The  bi- 
sector of  the  angle  has  been  taken  as  the 
main  axis  of  the  decorative  treatment. 
The  location  of  a  series  of  rooms  along 
the  sides  of  the  lot,  and  the  consideration 
of  symmetry  with  reference  to  this  axis, 
have  produced  a  central  space,  hexagonal 
in  plan,  and  capable  of  a  symmetrical 
handling.  This  space  is  enclosed  by  a 
screen  of  pink  Knoxville  marble,  with 
panels  of  openwork  bronze  grilles  backed 
by  glass,  and  columns  of  Skyros  marble. 
Upon  the  screen  is  concentrated  the  rich- 
est ornament  of  the  entire  composition. 
It  is  enriched  with  elaborate  carving,  in 
the  style  of  the  Italian  Renaissance,  with 
a  frieze,  representing  Greek  and  Amen- 


THE  ARCHITECTURAL  RECORD. 


113 


BANKING  ROOM-J.   P.  MORGAN  &  CO.,  NEW  YORK  CITY. 

Trowbridge  &  Livingston,  Architects. 


can  Indian  mythological  subjects,  by  Mr. 
Charles  Keck,  one  of  the  best  known  of 
the  younger  American  sculptors. 

The  concentration  of  interest  in  .this 
center  is  further  emphasized  by  the  great 
•circular  skylight  almost  directly  above 
it.  The  rest  of  the  ceiling  is  a  repeating 
design  of  hexagonal  coffers  and  circular 
roses,  broken  only  by  the  large  circular 
skylight  and  a  smaller  rectangular  one  in 
the  rear.  A  further  device  to  disguise 
the  irregular  outline  of  the  walls  is  the 
omission  of  an  order,  its  place  being 
taken  by  a  system  of  alternate  wide  and 
narrow  mosaic  panels,  the  latter  dec- 
orated with  trophies. 

The  space  within  the  screen  is  partly 
occupied  by  an  enclosure  for  the  officers ; 
the  remainder  is  public  space,  with  a  mo- 
saic pavement  inspired  from  Florentine 
designs.  Four  large  doors  interrupt  the 
screen,  one  of  them  being  the  main  en- 
trance to  the  building,  and  four  smaller 
doors  give  access  to  the  rooms  on  the 
street  fronts. 


The  space  on  the  right,  as  we  enter,  is 
devoted  to  offices  for  the  partners,  with 
a  small  ante-room  and  several  confer- 
ence rooms.  On  the  left,  beyond  two 
small  waiting-rooms  and  the  foreign  ex- 
change department,  one  of  t>e  large 
uoors  gives  access  to  the  banking  space. 
Around  this  are  grouped  the  compara- 
tively simple  facilities  for  the  handling 
of  money,  connected  by  stairs  and  an 
elevator  with  the  basements  containing 
the  vaults  and  store-rooms,  as  well  as  the 
transfer  department,  which  has  a  separ- 
ate entrance  from  Broad  Street,  whose 
slope  makes  possible  this  access  at  two 
different  levels.  The  space  beLw  ground 
contains  also  the  usual  heating  and  ven- 
tilating apparatus.  The  main  vault  is  of 
the  highest  type  of  burglar-proof  con- 
struction, the  principles  of  its  design  be- 
ing similar  to  those  already  discussed. 

Above  the  main  banking  room,  the  sec- 
ond story  contains  the  private  offices  of 
the  partners  and  their  secretaries,  Mr. 
Morgan's  office  being  directly  above  the 


114 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


First   Floor   Plan. 


BANKING  HOUSE  OF  J.  P.  MORGAN. 
&  CO.,  NEW  YORK  CITY.  TROW- 
BR1DGE  &  LIVINGSTON,  ARCHITECTS.. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


\\5 


MR.  MORGAN'S  PRIVATE  OFFICE-BANKING  HOUSE  OF  J.  P.  MORGAN  &  CO. 
Trowbridge  &  Livingston,  Architects. 


main  entrance  to  the  building-.  This  con- 
struction, with  no  interior  columns  to 
support  it  from  below,  gave  rise  to  a 
most  complicated  engineering  problem, 
capable  of  solution  only  by  the  use  of 
modern  methods  of  steel  construction. 
The  third  and  fourth  floors,  not  visible 
from  the  street,  contain  dining-rooms, 
janitor's  quarters,  and  other  minor  divi- 
sions, as  well  as  a  roof-garden  at  the 
fourth  floor  level,  facing  the  Stock  Ex- 
change. The  private  offices  are  panelled  in 
oak,  the  designs  being  varied  according  to 
the  taste  of  their  occupants.  They  are 
accessible  by  an  elevator  from  the  ante- 
room to  the  right  of  the  entrance,  that  of 
Mr.  Morgan  having  also  a  private  stair- 
case from  the  waiting-room  on  the  left. 


The  stairs  and  elevator  in  the  rear  give 
additional  access  to  these  offices,  as  well 
as  to  those  of  the  different  secretaries. 

The  exterior  of  the  building  is  simple 
in  the  extreme.  There  are  no  columns,, 
and  scarcely  any  carving,  excepting  on? 
the  mouldings  of  the  cornices  and  the 
mullions  between  the  second-story  win- 
dows. The  elaborate  bronze  screen  at 
the  entrance  is  the  only  suggestion  of  the 
rich  interior  that  appears  on  the  rather 
unassuming  fagade,  whose  whole  char- 
acter seems  intended  to  produce  an  at- 
mosphere of  serene  reticence,  contrast- 
ing vividly  with  its  florid  and  pretentious 
environment,  even  as  the  modest  altitude 
of  the  building  differentiates  it  from  the 
surrounding  skyscrapers. 


\. 


LOGGIA,  WOMEN'S  GYMNASIUM-JOHN  C. 
PROCTOR  RECREATION  CENTER,  PEORIA. 
ILL.  HEWITT  &  EMERSON,  ARCHITECTS. 


VIEW  OF  SWIMMING  POOL  COURT  AND  PLAYGROUNDS— JOHN  C.  PROCTOR  RECREATION 

CENTER,  PEORIA,  ILL. 
Hewitt   &  Emerson,  Architects. 


"UOHN  C  PROCTOR  RECREATION 
CENTER.  PEORIA.  ILLINOIS 

HEWITT   &>  EMERSON 
ARCHITECTS 


THE  will  of  the  late  John  C.  Proc- 
tor, a  life-long  resident  of  Peoria, 
devoted  his  entire  estate,  exclud- 
ing a  few  personal  bequests,  as  a  public 
charity  to  be  known  as  the  John  C.  Proc- 
tor Endowment.  A  board  of  seven  trus- 
tees was  named  whose  duty  it  is  to  care 
for  the  funds  and  property,  to  adminis- 
ter the  charities  established  during  his 
life,  and  to  provide,  so  far  as  the  income 
of  the  endowment  permits,  such  other 
aids  to  the  welfare  of  the  people  of  the 
city  of  Peoria  as  may  suggest  them- 
selves. 

Acting  on  the  provisions  of  the  will, 
the  trustees  projected  and  established 
the  John  C.  Proctor  Recreation  Center, 
located  in  the  midst  of  a  great  residential 
district  occupied  largely  by  people  of  the 
laboring  class. 

The  aim  of  the  trustees  was  to  pro- 
vide an  institution  with  every  facility  for 
furthering  the  physical,  social  and  moral 


welfare  of  the  community.  Men,  wom- 
en, boys  and  girls  are  provided  for,  prop- 
erly segregated. 

The  ground, 258  feet  by  700,bounded  by 
city  streets  on  four  sides,  was  purchased 
before  the  scope  of  the  Center  had  been 
fully  determined.  As  the  problem  de- 
veloped, it  was  found  that  the  ground, 
originally  thought  ample,  was  too  small. 
This  necessitated  some  restrictions  in 
planning  and  some  arrangements  which 
might  otherwise  have  been  avoided,  such 
as  the  placing  of  the  tennis  courts  on  the 
street  front  of  the  field  house. 

The  problem  required  the  planning  of 
an  institution,  the  best  examples  of  which 
were  probably  to  be  found  in  the  later 
Centers  built  by  the  South  Park  Com- 
mission in  Chicago.  Either  the  commit- 
tee or  the  architects  visited  most  of  the 
more  complete  and  recent  institutions  of 
the  kind  in  this  country;  but  the  general 
scheme  adopted  was  not  modelled  on  any 


118 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


precedent,  owing  to  differing  conditions. 
The  difference  in  scale,  the  fact  that  the 
scope  was  to  be  wider  than  that  of  any 
example  found,  and  the  shape  and  size 
of  the  ground,  required  original  treat- 
ment. The  Peoria  institution  is  consid- 
erably smaller  than  the  Chicago  institu- 
tions, but  covers  a  wider  scope  than  any 
of  them,  in  that  it  includes  bowling  and 
billiards. 

As  finally  developed,  the  problem  in- 
cluded the  fulfilling  of  the  following  re- 
quirements : 

Grounds — Provision  for  separate  play- 
grounds for  (1)  small  children,  (2)  girls 
and  women,  (3)  boys  and  men;  to  be 
sufficiently  separated  from  one  another 
to  prevent  interference  and  allow  proper 
supervision.  The  outdoor  playgrounds 
were  to  be  as  complete  and  spacious  as 
the  ground  permitted,  and  equipped  with 
provision  for  the  games,  play  and  gym- 
nastic apparatus  adapted  to  each  group. 
The  grounds  were  to  be  provided  with 
toilets  for  both  sexes  and  convenient 
drinking  fountains.  Shelters,  in  the 
form  of  loggias  connected  with  the  field 


house  and  also  in  the  form  of  separate 
structures,  were  to  be  included. 

Building  —  Provision  for  individual 
baths  for  both  sexes ;  gymnasiums,  lock- 
er rooms,  toilets  and  showers  for  both 
sexes ;  a  large  swimming-pool,  with  its 
dressing  rooms  and  appurtenances.  This 
feature  was  originally  intended  to  be 
housed  for  use  the  year  round.  On  in- 
vestigation, it  was  found  that  experience 
in  similar  Centers  elsewhere  showed  that 
a  pool  was  not  used  enough  in  cold 
weather  to  justify  the  considerable  extra 
cost  for  housing,  heating  and  mainte- 
nance. An  auditorium,  with  stage  large 
enough  for  amateur  theatricals,  dressing 
rooms,  coat  rooms,  and  the  like,  was  to 
be  used  both  for  audiences  and  for  so- 
cial affairs  and  dances.  A  library  and 
reading  room,  and  club  rooms,  with 
kitchen,  bowling  alleys,  billiard  and  pool 
rooms  were  additional  features. 

In  addition,  the  building  must  contain 
a  rotunda  and  office,  private  offices  for 
the  director  and  his  assistant ;  a  laundry, 
a  boiler  room,  space  for  ventilating  ap- 
paratus, store  rooms,  custodian's  room 


ALLEN  STREET  ENTRANCE— JOHN  C.  PROCTOR  RECREATION  CENTER,  PEORIA,  ILL. 
Hewitt   &   Emerson,  Architects. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


119 


ALLEN  STREET  FRONT— JOHN  C.  PROCTOR  RECREATION  CENTER. 
Hewitt   &   Emerson,  Architects. 


and  offices  for  the  physical  directors, 
male  and  female,  and  apparatus  rooms 
in  connection  with  the  gymnasiums. 

The  problem  of  planning  the  building 
was,  briefly,  to  separate  the  departments 
used  exclusively  by  either  sex;  to  place 
the  principal  departments  used  by  both 
sexes  so  as  to  be  available  from  both  the 
male  and  female  sides  of  the  building; 
to  segregate  the  boys  from  the  men  and 
the  girls  from  the  women  as  regards 
toilets  and  locker  rooms ;  to  provide  am- 
ple circulation  and  co-ordinate  the  vari- 
ous parts ;  to  so  mask  the  boiler  room  as 
to  make  it  inconspicuous ;  and,  finally,  to 
provide  the  maximum  of  supervision 
with  the  minimum  number  of  attendants. 

All  departments,  whether  for  man, 
woman,  boy  or  girl,  are  reached  directly 
from  the  rotunda  and  office.  The  boys' 
and  girls'  locker  and  toilet  rooms  are  in 
the  basement  and  are  reached  by  special 
stairway  on  either  side  respectively. 
The  gymnasium  floors  are  directly  on  the 
ground,  about  midway  between  the  base- 
ment and  first-floor  levels.  This  places 
the  gymnasiums  and  exits  to  the  swim- 
ming-pool and  playgrounds  in  proper  re- 
lation thereto,  and  facilitates  th  •  relation 


of  the  boys'  and  girls'  locker  rooms  with 
the  circulation  corridors  and  gym- 
nasiums. 

The  swimming-pool  approaches  are  so 
arranged  that  entrance  to  the  enclosure 
is  at  one  end  only,  directly  in  front  of 
the  shower  baths,  use  of  which  is  re- 
quired before  entering  the  pool.  The 
ends  of  the  circulation  corridors  act  as 
waiting  places  when  the  crowds  in  hot 
weather  exceed  the  capacity  of  the  pool. 
The  windows  allow  those  waiting  to  wit- 
ness the  sport  they  are  soon  to  enjoy. 

Among  the  minor  problems  were  the 
construction  of  the  pool,  containing 
about  150,000  gallons  of  water,  the 
plumbing,  heating,  lighting,  ventilating 
and, sanitary  arrangements;  all  of  which 
were  successfully  handled  by  the  archi- 
tects. The  water  in  the  pool  is  heated 
throughout  the  season  to  take  off  the 
chill.  The  pool  can  be  emptied,  cleaned, 
refilled  and  heated  in  twelve  hours. 

The  building  is  of  fireproof  construc- 
tion, except  the  roof.  The  exterior  is 
faced  with  a  gray  mat  brick  in  two 
shades,  laid  in  double  Flemish  bond,  a 
light  shade  double  stretcher  and  a  single 
stretcher  of  the  darker  shade  alternating. 


U  hj  i 


O  U   N   D 


BA5E  BALL  DIAMOND 


WADING  Pod 


SMALL  CHILDREN^' 

PLAYC  ROUND 


c  i  R  L  5' 
PLAY  G  R.OUN  D  • 


SWIMMING  POOL  LOGGIA— JOHN  C. 
PROCTOR  RECREATION  CENTER,  PEORIA, 
ILL.  HEWITT  &  EMERSON,  ARCHITECTS. 


126 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


BASEMENT  AND  SECOND  FLOOR-JOHN  C. 
PROCTOR  RECREATION  CENTER,  PEORIA. 
ILL.  HEWITT  &  EMERSON,  ARCHITECTS. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


127 


GENERAL  VIEW  FROM  PLAYGROUNDS 
AND  PLAN  OF  FIRST  FLOOR-JOHN  C. 
PROCTOR  RECREATION  CENTER,  PEORIA, 
ILL.  HEWITT  &  EMERSON,  ARCHITECTS. 


130 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


LOGGIA,  WOMEN'S  GYMNASIUM— JOHN  C.  PROCTOR  RECREATION  CENTER,  PEORIA,  ILL. 

Hewitt   &   Emerson,  Architects. 


SWIMMING  POOL  COURT-JOHN  C.  PROCTOR  RECREATION  CENTER,  PEORIA,  ILL. 
Hewitt   &  Emerson,  Architects. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


131 


The  joints  are  five-eighths  inch  flush 
joints  of  natural  color  cement  mortar, 
left  with  rough  texture.  Certain  trim- 
mings, such  as  arches,  pilasters,  and  the 
like  are  entirely  of  the  darker  shade 
brick  with  horizontal  joints  deeply  raked 
out.  The  stone  is  buff  Indiana  limestone. 
The  roof  covering  is  of  red  interlocking 
shingle  tile. 

On  the  interior  the  architects  were 
given  practically  carte  blanch?  to  use 
materials  best  fitted  for  the  various  pur- 
poses. Terrazzo  and  marble  are  used  for 
floors,  except  rooms  requiring  finished 
oak  or  maple  floors.  All  bath,  toilet  and 
locker  rooms  are  of  gray  Tennessee  mar- 
ble and  white  enamelled  brick  with  cove 
angles.  The  swimming-pool  is  lined  with 
white  tile,  with  sanitary  overflow  rim  in 
white  glazed  terra  cotta.  All  exposed 
metal  in  bath  and  toilet  rooms  has  been 
reduced  to  a  minimum  and  is  of  white 
rnetal. 

The  two  things  kept  uppermost  in  the 


minds  :,pf  the  architects  in  designing  in- 
terior details  of  the  building  were  to  use 
the  most  fitting  and  durable  materials  in 
the  simplest  and  most  cleanable  forms 
and  to  make  everything,  so  far  as  possi- 
ble, "boy-proof."  All  pipes,  tanks  and 
valves  in  toilets  and  bathrooms  are  con- 
cealed in  pipe  corridors.  All  fastenings 
and  removable  parts  are  so  far  as  possi- 
ble concealed,  and  all  construction  is  of 
the  staunchest. 

Hot,  cold  and  circulation  water  sup- 
plies for  building  and  grounds  are  con- 
trolled from  the  valve  pit,  convenient  of 
access  by  the  engineer  by  means  of  a 
tunnel  from  the  boiler  room.  This  tun- 
nel also  contains  heating  mains,  water 
service  and  other  pipes. 

The  entire  grounds  are  lighted,  for 
night  use,  by  means  of  tungsten  clusters 
and  outlets  on  the  semi-circular  wall 
around  the  swimming-pool  enclosure  and 
on  the  brick  posts  of  the  iron  fence  en- 
closing the  grounds. 


DETAIL  OF  COLONNADE-MON- 
TREAL ART  GALLERY  E.  AND 
W.  S.  MAXWELL,  ARCHITECTS. 


TYPICAL  GALLERY  SEAT— MONTREAL  ART  GALLERY. 
E.  and  W.   S.  Maxwell,  Architects. 


^MONTREAL  ART  GALLERY 

E.  tf  W.  S  .  MAXWELL,  ARCHITECTS 
BY  THOMAS  W.LVDLOW 


THE  present  building  for  the  Art 
Association  of  Montreal  had  its 
inception  about  four  years  ago, 
when  the  Council  for  the  Association 
decided  to  hold  a  limited  competition  for 
the  selection  of  plans  for  a  new  gal- 
lery. Three  of  the  leading  local  archi- 
tectural firms  were  asked  to  submit 
schemes  on  conditions  drawn  up  by  the 
late  Mr.  Edmund  M.  Wheelwright,  who 
was  selected  as  assessor  on  account  of  his 
experience  with  the  Boston  Museum  of 
Fine  Arts,  and  the  valuable  data  col- 
lected by  him  in  this  connection  was 
placed  at  the  disposal  of  the  competitors. 
Messrs.  E.  and  W.  S.  Maxwell  were  ad- 
judged the  winners  in  the  competition 
and  the  erection  of  the  gallery  was  in- 
trusted to  them. 

The  site  of  the  new  structure  on 
Sherbrooke  Street,  flanked  for  half  a 
mile  or  more  on  either  side  with  great 


houses  in  large  terrace  gardens,  was  an 
ideal  one  for  the  style  selected — Neo- 
Classic — although  there  was  some  criti- 
cism at  the  time  the  competition  was 
awarded  that  the  severely  classical  de- 
sign chosen  reflected  the  modern  French 
school  rather  than  the  purely  British 
spirit  of  the  other  designs. 

The  building  is  composed  on  its  main 
front  of  a  central  colonnade  of  the  Ionic 
order,  forming  a  portico  flanked  by  two 
slightly  projecting  wings  which  frankly 
express  the  internal  disposition  of  the 
exhibition  halls — a  lateral  one  over  the 
entrance,  having  on  either  hand  smaller 
galleries  at  right  angles  to  it.  The  side 
elevation  on  Ontario  Avenue,  incomplete 
at  the  moment,  will  consist  of  a  composi- 
tion in  three  parts — a  central  feature  and 
two  side  pavilions  joined  to  the  central 
mass  by  connecting  links.  The  complet- 
ed portions  of  the  main  and  side  facades 


134 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


MAIN  FACADE  ON  SHERBROOKE  STREET-MONTREAL  ART  GALLERY. 
E.  and  W.  S.  Maxwell,  Architects. 


FLOOR  PLANS  OF  THE  MONTREAL  ART  GALLERY. 
E.  and  W.  S.  Maxwell,  Architects. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


135 


are  built  of  blue-white  marble  from  Ver- 
mont; and  the  base  course,  entrance 
steps,  and  coping  enclosing  the  low  grass 
terrace  surrounding  the  building  are  of 
gray  granite,  which  almost  matches  in 


frieze  placed  directly  under  the  ceiling 
of  the  pteroma,  to  emphasize  the  top- 
lighted  galleries  on  the  main  floor.  The 
ceiling  of  the  pteroma  is  deeply  coffered 
in  the  rich  traditional  manner.  The  col- 


DETAIL  OF  MAIN  FRONT— MONTREAL  ART  GALLERY. 
E.   and  W.  S.  Maxwell,  Architects. 


color   and    completely    harmonizes    with 
the  marble  above. 

The  main  entrance  is  approached  by 
a  broad  flight  of  steps  enclosed  between 
pedestals  leading  up  to  the  colonnade, 
behind  which  are  three  arched  entrance 
doors.  Above  these  the  wall  is  left  plain, 
except  for  a  delicately  carved  Greek  fret 


umns  themselves  are  beautifully  cut 
monoliths,  considering  they  are  over 
thirty-one  feet  in  height. 

The  doorways  are  treated  in  the 
straightforward  Italian  manner  with  a 
continuous  undecorated  architrave  and 
have  no  elaboration,  excepting  the  richly 
carved  key-blocks  that  project  too  far 


136 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


DETAIL  OF   PAVILION   WINDOW-MONTREAL 
ART  GALLERY. 

and  in  consequence  have  the  appearance 
of  applied  rather  than  structural  orna- 
ment. 

The  flanking  pavilions  are  treated  in 
the  same  direct  manner  as  the  centra! 
portion,  only  here  the  windows  lighting 
the  lower  galleries  are  framed  in  by  a 
nicely  proportioned  slightly  recessed 
panel.  The  windows  are  of  the  simple 
console  or  bracket  type  without  cham- 
branles.  Above  the  openings  are  placed 
sculptured  plaques,  approximately  three 
and  one-half  feet  high  by  ten  feet  long, 
rilling  out  the  panels.  These  plaques  are 
carved  in  white  marble  in  low  relief  and 
represent  the  spirit  and  traditions  of 
Classic  art. 

The  side  elevation  presents  a  very  in- 
teresting and  practical  adaptation  of 
U-Bar  greenhouse  construction  over  the 
studios  of  the  Art  School.  In  employing 
this  method  of  lighting,  the  architects 
have  successfully  overcome  one  of  the 
greatest  difficulties  of  using  skylights  in 
this  northern  climate — the  joint  on  the 
inclined  surface  that  will  keep  tight  un- 
der the  varying  and  trying  conditions  of 
snow  and  ice  which  have  to  be  reckoned 
with  for  at  least  five  months  each  year. 

Below  the  Art  School  are  a  series  of 


side-lighted  exhibition  rooms,  which  are 
adequately  expressed  on  the  exterior  by 
a  row  of  square-headed  windows  over 
the  side  entrance.  Although  these  look 
amply  large  from  the  outside,  the  na- 
tural illumination  within  these  rooms  is 
not  as  good  as  one  would  suppose  from 
the  size  of  the  openings. 

The  only  decorative  feature  on  the 
lateral  front  is  the  well  proportioned  and 
delicately  treated  doorv/ay,  that  is  nicely 
combined  with  the  flanking  windows  into 
a  distinctive  feature  by  means  of  a 
cornice  and  pilasters. 

The  chief  features  on  the  ground  floor 
are  the  almost  extravagantly  commodious 
entrance  and  stairhalls  on  both  the  Sher- 
brooke  Street  and  Ontario  Avenue 


MAIN  ENTRANCE  DOOR— MONTREAL  ART 
GALLERY. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


137 


DETAIL  OF  BRONZE   GRILLE  OVER  ENTRANCE  DOORS— MONTREAL  ART  GALLERY. 

E.  and  W.   S.   Maxwell,  Architects. 


fronts,  an  exhibition  hall  for  casts,  a 
,  lecture  hall  and  three  rooms  for  show- 
ing case  objects,  two  of  which,  those  on 
the  right  of  the  main  entrance,  are  being 
used  until  the  completion  of  the  build- 
ing as  a  library  and  council  room,  and 
secretary's  office,  respectively.  - 

The  main  entrance  hall,  which  is  sixty- 
two  feet  long  by  twenty-four  and  one- 
half  feet  wide,  is  reached  through  three 
small  vestibules.  It  is  a  well  propor- 
tioned room,  covered  with  an  elliptical 
plaster  barrel  vault  with  penetrations. 
The  walls  and  piers  of  this  hall  are  of 
Botticino  marble.  This  great  hall  de- 
pends entirely  for  effect  upon  its  propor- 
tions and  upon  the  color  of  the  marble, 
and  the  only  decoration  used,  a  molded 
band  of  flowers  and  fruit  forming  a 
panel  in  the  plaster  vault,  seems  a  trifle 
heavy  for  the  architecture  below,  and  is 
decidedly  out  of  scale  with  the  delicately 
designed  and  beautifully  carved  marble 
and  alabaster  lamp  standards  which  at 
the  same  time  illuminate  and  are  the  only 


furnishings  in  this  part  of  the  building. 
The  main  stairs  are  reached  by  ascend- 
ing a  few  steps  from  the  entrance  hall 
and  crossing  a  narrow  circulation  pas- 
sage. These  stairs,  as  well  as  all  of  the 
architecture  surrounding  them,  are  of 
Botticino  marble  treated  in  the  most 
severe  manner,  without  moldings.  Here, 
as  in  the  entrance  hall,  the  ceilings  of 
the  passages  surrounding  the  stair  well 
are  vaulted  in  plaster,  only  in  this  case 
they  are  divided  into  square  bays  cov- 
ered with  groined  vaults,  excepting  the 
compartment  immediately  in  front  of  the 
stairs,  which  on  account  of  its  greater 
width  is  covered  with  a' flat  panel.  This 
latter  treatment,  that  is,  the  increased 
width  of  the  central  bay,  seems  to  have 
caused  the  architects  trouble  on  both 
sides  of  the  archway,  as  on  the  hall  side 
the  flatter  penetration  gives  unequal 
warped  surfaces.  On  the  stair  side  a 
very  flat  oblong  groined  vault  would 
certainly  have  been  more  pleasing  than 
the  flat  ceiling  and  might  have  sug- 


138 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


ONTARIO  AVENUE  FRONT-MONTREAL  ART 
GALLERY. 

gested  another  method  of  artificial  light- 
ing than  the  rather  awkward  appear- 
ance of  the  bowl,  like  those  used  in  side 
passages,  but  hung  in  this  case  without 
the  chains. 

To  the  right  and  left  of  the  entrance 
hall  are  two  lateral  galleries  treated  in 
a  direct  and  sensible  manner  without  or- 
namentation. The  lighting  in  these 
rooms,  both  natural  and  artificial,  is  ex- 
ceedingly well  disposed,  and  the  walls 
are  covered  with  a  neutral  gray  burlap, 
which  at  the  same  time  affords  an  ex- 
cellent background  and  is  exceedingly 
restful  to  the  eyes.  The  gallery  to  the 
right,  temporarily  used  as  the  library, 
is  shown  on  page  147. 

The  council  room,  reached  from  the 
library  by  going  up  a  few  steps,  is  treat- 
ed and  decorated  in  a  similar  manner 
to  the  adjoining  room,  only  here  the  elec- 
tric fixtures  are  hung  from  the  under- 
side of  the  beams  instead  of  from  the 


panels,  a  wrong  use  aesthetically  for 
structural  forms  even  though  one  knows 
that  in  present-day  construction  there  is 
ample  room  for  the  conduits  inside  of 
the  false  beam  shell. 

The  Ontario  Avenue  entrance  is  in- 
tended for  the  use  of  the  art  students 
and  the  administration.  It  opens  into  an 
ample  vestibule  which  gives  direct  com- 
munication to  the  offices,  stairs  to  the 
studios,  and  the  transverse  sculpture 
gallery. 

Besides  the  various  rooms  mentioned 
or  described,  ample  provision  is  made  on 
the  ground  floor  for  coat  rooms,  ticket 
offices,  shafts  for  both  passenger  and 
freight  elevators  and  other  accessories, 
skillfully  arranged  in  inconspicuous 
places,  but  accessible  from  the  point  of 
administration. 

The  main  stairs  from  the  ground  to 
the  chief  exhibition  floor  lead  from  the 
entrance  hall  in  straight  easy  runs  with 
ample  landings  into  a  spacious  top-light- 
ed gallery.  Generous  as  this  space  is, 
sixty-six  feet  long  by  twenty-nine  and 
one-half  feet  wide,  the  proportions  and 
handling  of  the  stairs  are  so  fine  that 
one  is  met  on  ascending  with  a  sense  of 
disappointment  to  find  them  blocked,  so 
to  speak,  by  a  wall  instead  of  a  vista 
of  galleries  or,  at  least,  some  striking 
architectural  feature  on  the  axis. 

The  stairwell  is  flanked  on  either  side 
by  exhibition  passages  twelve  feet  wide, 
which  give  access  to  the  main  gallery. 
On  the  well  side  of  these  passages  there 
are  Doric  colonnades  of  Botticino  mar- 
ble that  support  the  superstructure  of 
the  roof.  The  capitals  and  bases  of  these 
columns  are  of  bronze,  as  is  also  the 
handrail  between  them.  The  walls  on 
the  opposite  side  of  the  passages  are  un- 
broken for  exhibition  purposes,  the 
colonnade  being  recalled  at  the  corners 
only  by  pilasters. 

The  main  gallery  over  the  entrance 
hall  and  vestibule  and  the  flanking  side 
galleries  are  rooms  of  considerable  size, 
being  sixty-three  feet  long  by  thirty- 
three  feet  wide  and  sixty  and  one-half 
feet  long  by  thirty-one  feet  wide,  re- 
spectively. These  rooms  are  top-light- 
ed, the  skylights  filling  the  whole  of  the 
ceiling,  except  for  a  deep  coved  cornice. 


DETAIL  OF  ENTRANCE  ON  ONTARIO 
AVENUE-MONTREAL  ART  GALLERY. 
E.  AND  VV.  S.  MAXWELL,  ARCHITECTS. 


MARBLE  AND  ALABASTER  LAMP  STAND- 
ARDS—MONTREAL ART  GALLERY.  K. 
AND  W.  S.  MAXWELL.  ARCHITECT! 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


141 


DOORWAY  TO  EXHIBITION  GALLER- 
IES-MONTREAL ART  GALLERY.  E. 
AND  W.  S.  MAXWELL,  ARCHITECTS. 


PASSAGE  AND  COLONNADE  FLANKING  MAIN 
STAIR  WELL—  MONTREAL  ART  GALLERY. 
E.  AND  W.  S.  MAXWELL,  ARCHITECTS. 


144 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


MAIN  EXHIBITION  GALLERY- MONTREAL  ART  GALLERY. 

E.  and  \V.   S.  Maxwell,  Architects. 


TYPICAL  EXHIBITION  GALLERY-MONTREAL  ART  GALLERY 
E.  and  W.  S.  Maxwell,  Architects 


<  5 

e>G 

*v 

H 


. 

<  J 
W  <-) 

«  w 


146 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


This  arrangement  has  two  advantages; 
first,  the  glass  area  is  sufficient  to  give 
excellent  lighting  to  the  pictures  and, 
secondly,  it  leaves  large  uninterrupted 
wall  spaces,  which  are  so  important  in  a 
structure  of  this  kind. 

There  is  no  pretense  of  any  architec- 
tural treatment  in  the  galleries  them- 
selves ;  the  only  decorative  notes  are  the 
brocades,  old  rose  or  light  green,  which 
are  hung  on  the  walls,  and  the  door 
trim,  which  is  treated  like  a  great  picture 
frame.  The  colored  brocade  wall  cov- 
erings above  mentioned  were  put  on  at 
the  instigation  of  ^^^^^^ 
the  building  commit- 
tee with  the  idea  of 
imparting  a  home- 
like appearance  to 
the  galleries  and  has 
always  proven  a  dis- 
appointment, because 
the  pattern  and  the 
color  of  the  material 
detract  from  the  pic- 
tures, and  in  a  gal- 
lery where  the  pic- 
tures are  constantly 
changed,  the  perma- 
nent collection  being 
taken  down  several 
times  a  year  to  make 
room  for  special  ex- 
hibitions, the  walls 
have  become  patchy 
from  uneven  fad- 
ing. This,  however, 
is  soon  to  be  ob- 
viated, as  a  neutral 
tinted  burlap  is  to 
replace  the  brocade 
as  a  wall  covering. 

Continuing  the  circuit,  there  are  three 
side-lighted  galleries  on  the  Ontario  Ave- 
nue front  of  the  building.  These  rooms, 
on  account  of  the  Art  School  above  them, 
are  considerably  lower  than  the  main 
galleries.  They  are  also  less  satisfac- 
tory from  a  point  of  view  of  illumina- 
tion, the  ceilings  not  being  high  enough 
to  admit  sufficient  natural  light  for  the 
depth  of  the  rooms,  and  the  artificial 
light,  besides  being  insufficient  as  to 
volume,  is  poorly  placed,  the  alabaster 
bowl  being  hung  from  the  underside  of 


the  beams;  and  the  light  supposed  to 
be  reflected  by  the  ceiling,  from  the  de- 
sign of  the  fixtures,  is  broken  up  and 
lost  almost  entirely  by  the  sides  of  the 
beams. 

The  Art  School  on  the  top  floor  is 
splendidly  arranged,  both  as  to  light  and 
convenience,  and  consists  of  three  large 
top-lighted  studios,  two  for  cast  draw- 
ing and  one  for  life  work,  with  the  neces- 
sary toilet  accommodations  for  men  and 
women  students,  storage  space,  and  the 
like.  The  walls  in  this  portion  of  the 
building  are  all  covered  with  neutral 
tinted  burlap,  which 
affords  the  best 
possible  background 
for  all  objects  of 
art. 

The  major  part  of 
the  basement  is 
devoted  to  the  ap- 
paratus for  heating, 
ventilating,  and  vac- 
uum cleaning ;  the 
rest  of  the  space  is 
devoted  to  a  large 
modeling  room  in 
connection  with  the 
Art  School,  a  lunch 
room  for  the  stud- 
ents, ample  janitor's 
quarters,  public  lava- 
tories and  storage. 

Particular  atten- 
tion should  be  paid 
to  the  finely  designed 
and  beautifully  exe- 
cuted bronze  work 
used  where  occa- 
sion demands  in  the 
different  parts  of 

the  building.  The  grilles  over  the  entrance 
doors  typify  the  arts  by  means  of  a  small 
figure  supported  by  acanthus  scrolls; 
the  grilles  themselves  are  of  an  open 
design,  in  order  that  light  may  penetrate 
the  vestibules  and  entrance  hall  when  the 
doors  below  them  are  closed.  The 
newels  and  hand-rail  of  the  main  stairs 
are  a  splendid  combination  of  wrought 
and  cast  forms  in  bronze ;  the  designs 
have  a  distinctly  metal  character  and  are 
well  proportioned  to  the  space  which 
thev  have  to  fill. 


BRONZE    NEWEL   AND   HANDRAIL- 
MONTREAL  ART  GALLERY. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


147 


COUNCIL  ROOM— MONTREAL  ART  GALLERY 
E.   and  W.   S.  Maxwell,  Architects. 


LIBRARY  ON   GROUND    FLOOR— MONTREAL  ART   GALLERY. 
E.   and  W.   S.  Maxwell,  Architects. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


The  furniture,  also  designed  by  the 
architects,  shows  a  simplicity  and  dig- 
nity that  make  it  harmonize  with  the 
architecture  about  it.  The  table  in  the 
gallery  at  the  head  of  the  main  stairs  is  a 
rich  and  pleasing  'Renaissance  design; 
the  gallery  seat  shown  on  page  133 
"is  severe  in  its  straight  classical  lines 
that  are  relieved  from  monotony  by 
charming  bits  of  decorations  on  the 
supporting  standards  and  back.  The 


furniture  throughout  is  of  oak  with  a 
natural  flat  oil" finish  to  match  the  archi- 
traves, doors  and  the  little  other  wood- 
work found  in  the  building. 

In  conclusion,  the  Montreal  Art  Gal- 
lery is  a  carefully  designed,  well  thought 
out,  and  finely  executed  piece  of  work, 
which,  notwithstanding  the  criticisms  in 
the  preceding  paragraphs,  is  a  worthy 
monument  and  one  that  should  serve  as 
an  inspiration  to  those  who  study  it. 


DETAIL  OF   BRONZE  HANDRAIL— MONTREAL  ART   GALLERY 
E.   and  W.   S.   Maxwell,  Architects. 


THE  ARCHITECTS  PART 
IN  THE  WORLD'S  WORK 

AN  ADDRESS    BY 
FREDERICK-  L    ACKERMAN 


IN  giving  this  talk  before 
the  students  and  the  fac- 
ulty of  the  College  of  Ar- 
chitecture of  Cornell  Univer- 
sity, I  had  in  mind  to  awaken 
in  the  students  an  interest  in  a  phase  of 
our  work  which  is  given  but  scant  con- 
sideration in  our  schools — to  open  for 
discussion  the  need  of  a  material  revision 
of  school  curricula  in  harmony  with  the 
efforts  of  the  American  Institute  of  Ar- 
chitects, the  Beaux-Arts  Society,  and 
similar  bodies,  for  the  furtherance  of 
educational  facilities  both  within  our 
schools  and  during  the  years  immediately 
following  graduation.  The  question  is 
this :  Are  we  devoting  any  serious  effort 
in  the'  direction  of  showing  students 
clearly  the  need  of  a  greater  degree  of 
co-ordinated  effort  with  civic,  State  and 
national  bodies  whose  aims  are  directed 
toward  developing  a  better  physical  con- 
dition within  our  communities?  What 
are  we  doing  to  instill  in  their  minds  the 
idea  that  it  is  through  voluntary  and  un- 
remunerative  service  on  the  part  of  the 
architect  that  we  can  approach,  within  a 
reasonable  degree  of  attainment,  our 
ideals,  both  aesthetic  and  utilitarian  ?  Do 
we  in  any  way  prepare  them  for  this 
service  which  is  of  right  demanded  of 
them  by  the  communities  when  they  en- 
ter upon  their  life  work  and  accept  the 
responsibilities  of  citizenship?  Do  we 
open  their  eyes  to  the  fact  that  it  is  alone 
through  this  voluntary  service,  the  giving 
of  time  and  energy  to  community  prob- 
lems, that  we  can  provide  the  conditions 
through  which  there  may  be  developed  a 
vital,  indigenous  architecture,  expressive 
of  democracy? 

These  questions  are  not  the 
result  of  speculation  but,  in- 
stead, have  been  suggested  by 
talks  with  students  and  recent 
graduates  of  our  schools, 


which  it  was  made  clear  that 
they  did  not  understand  or 
even  hold  the  vaguest  con- 
ception concerning  the  re- 
lation of  their  work  to  the 
problems  of  the  community  at  large. 

AFTER  GRADUATION. 

After  leaving  the  school  the  draughts- 
man passes  through  an  apprenticeship 
of  some  years  of  office  practice.  Dur- 
ing this  period  his  horizon  is  limited 
in  most  cases  by  the  office  in  whicb 
he  works ;  he  rarely  comes  into  close 
personal  contact  with  the  clients ;  he 
is  not  interested  personally  in  the 
community  problems,  because  we  have 
developed  in  him  an  attitude  of  self-com- 
placency. He  is  not  made  aware  of  the 
efforts  of  our  own  professional  bodies  to- 
ward developing  and  maintaining  higher 
ethical  standards  in  the  profession  and 
toward  the  improvement  of  community 
conditions  related  to  our  work.  He  is 
left  unconscious  of  this  through  lack  of 
effort  on  our  part  to  better  acquaint  him 
with  the  nature  of  the  problems  and  the 
methods  of  solving  them.  We  do  little 
to  stimulate  in  him  a  desire  to  aid  in  the 
solution  of  these  problems,  and  still  less 
to  awaken  in  him  a  greater  appreciation 
of  his  responsibility  toward  the  com- 
munity in  which  he  lives. 

We  do  little,  indeed,  to  instruct  him  in 
the  complicated  processes  by  which  we 
translate,  through  the  efforts  of  our  so- 
cieties, our  ideals  into  actual  conditions. 
We  do  still  less  toward  showing  him  the 
methods  through  which  our  ideals  and  the 
vague  aspirations  of  our  people  can  be 
translated  into  laws  and  ordinances  pro- 
viding the  conditions  which 
will  permit  us  to  express, 
in  terms  of  steel  and  stone, 
a  vital,  living  architecture 
in  of  our  own  time  and  country. 


150 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


I  have  not  been 
so  long  away 
from  the  school 
that  it  is  at  all 
difficult  for  me 
to  recall  distinctly  the  ideas  and  the  ambi- 
tions which  I  possessed  when  I  was  a 
student  like  yourselves.  The  times  have 
changed  somewhat  during  the  intervening 
period  of  years,  but  the  change  has  not 
been  so  great  as  to  warrant  me  in  as- 
suming that  you  now  possess  a  different 
set  of  ideas  or  entertain  other  ambitions. 

THE    DIFFERENCE    BETWEEN    PRESENT    AND 
PAST  CONDITIONS. 

The  scope  of  your  work  has  broad- 
ened ;  the  efficiency  of  those  directing 
your  work  has  greatly  increased ;  and 
your  powers,  therefore,  I  assume  are 
greater.  My  case  is  somewhat  different. 
A  number  of  years  ago  I  left  this  school 
with  its  traditions  and  went  out  into  the 
world  of  practice,  and  with  me  I  took  a 
certain  definite  idealism,  such  as  you  pos- 
sess today.  I  have  seen  that  change 
from  year  to  year  in  contact  with  the 
world  as  opportunities  for  service  were 
opened  to  me ;  I  have  seen  that  idealism 
grow,  and  I  now  bring  the  result  to  you. 

Today  I  shall  not  talk  at  any  length 
about  the  past,  and  I  shall  use  the  pres- 
ent only  as  an  example.  The  future  with 
its  infinite  possibilities,  your  opportuni- 
ties, and  the  part  you  should  play  in  the 
world's  work,  is  the  subject  of  my  talk. 

WHAT  DOES  ARCHITECTURE  MEAN? 

I  shall  throughout  use  the  term  "archi- 
tecture" in  a  broad  sense  and  I  want  you 
to  conceive  that  term  as  embracing  and 
including  all  that  is  generally  associated 
with  the  term  "art"  as  applied  to  painting 
and  sculpture.  In  truth,  the  two  latter 
elements  are  but  parts  when  we  conceive 
architecture  as  the  physical  expression  of 
a  civilization. 

I  shall  not  attempt  to 
define  the  term  "archi- 
tecture" nor  the  term 
"art."  Definitions  are 
but  relative.  I  want  you 
to  think  of  architecture 


in  a  much  broader  sense  than  is  our  cus- 
tom. Consider  the  term,  eliminating  en- 
tirely from  your  mind  the  ideas  so  gen- 
erally associated  with  the  words  "art  and 
beauty."  Think  of  architecture  as  an 
expression  of  conditions,  the  resultant  of 
complex  forces.  Architecture  may  be  a 
beautiful  or  it  may  be  an  ugly  expression. 
Whether  or  not  the  term  "art"  presup- 
poses an  element  of  beauty  contained, 
matters  little.  We  surely  all  recognize 
the  fact  that  "architecture"  is  sometimes 
inexpressibly  ugly. 

I  am  not  going  to  consider  with  you  or 
discuss  the  relative  beauty  of  different 
architectural  expressions  of  the  day;  that 
enters  into  your  day's  work.  I  shall  not 
consider  with  you  the  adaptability  of  cer- 
tain styles  of  architecture  to  present  con- 
ditions ;  that  is  an  academic  question.  I 
shall  not  attempt  to  compare  what  we  are 
doing  today  with  the  effort  of  the  past; 
that  again  concerns  the  work  of  the 
school.  As  I  have  said,  my  topic  con- 
cerns the  future,  and  it  shall  be  my  en- 
deavor to  awaken  in  you  a  broader  con- 
ception of  the  great  problems  before  you 
than  1  possessed  when  I  left  the  school. 

HOW  SHALL  WE  ATTAIN  OUR  IDEALS? 

My  purpose  is  not  to  change  the  nature 
of  your  idealism;  my  object  is  to  point 
out  to  you  the  absolute  necessity  for  your 
performing  certain  acts  and  sharing  indi- 
vidually certain  responsibilities  which  I 
shall  discuss  with  you,  for  it  is  through 
such  acts  alone  that  you  will  be  able  to 
turn  your  idealism,  a  shadow  form  itself, 
into  definite  realities. 

We  have  not  lacked,  nor  do  we  now 
lack,  idealism.  That  we  have  been  ut- 
terly impotent  to  create  beautiful  or  even 
utilitarian  cities  does  not  prove  that  our 
idealism  is  at  fault.  I  suggest,  however, 
that  we  do  not  individually,  or  as  a  body, 
understand  the  nature  of  the  processes 
necessary  to  a  fruition  of  our  ideals.  We 
must,  stoop  to  conquer. 

What  is  the  relation  of 
the  architect  to  his  ideals, 
to  his  own  work,  and  to 
the  age  in  which  he 
lives?  Wrhat  are  the 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


151 


methods  whereby  he  may  be  able  to  in- 
terpret the  age  in  which  he  lives  and  to 
mould  it,  and,  in  turn,  express  not  only 
what  is  best  in  himself  but  the  best  that 
is  in  his  age  as  well?  .Upon  this  latter 
phase  of  his  work  I  wish  to  lay  particular 
emphasis,  for  it  will  become  in  later 
years,  if  you  are  serious  in  your  en- 
deavor, the  subject  of  your  greater  inter- 
est. It  is  my  wish  to  make  it  the  sub- 
ject of  your  most  serious  consideration 
now. 

We  are  all  too  apt  to  think  only  of  the 
problem  at  hand.  We  look  forward  to 
that  time  when  we  shall  be  given  impor- 
tant commissions  to  execute  and  our  as- 
sumption is  that  we  shall  then  proceed 
to  execute  them,  depending  upon  our  own 
individual  ability  and  our  imagination  to 
find  the  proper  solution.  We  have  not 
fully  awakened  to  the  reality,  to  the  fact 
that  in  many  phases  of  our  work  the  sur- 
rounding conditions  are  such  that  a  good 
solution  of  the  problem  is  utterly  im- 
possible. 

There  are  certain  structures,  such  as 
isolated  buildings,  country  houses  and 
the  like,  in  which  this  thought  does  not 
apply;  but  in  the  vast  majority  of  cases 
there  are  conditions  which  prohibit  the 
working  out  of  our  ideals.  In  the  prob- 
lem of  the  country  house,  if  the  needs  be 
well  defined,  if  the  program  of  require- 
ments be  reasonable,  it  becomes  a  matter 
of  individual  effort  on  our  part ;  and  the 
result  is  a  measure  of  our  ability  to  de- 
sign, to  influence  the  client  in  the  right 
direction,  and  to  exercise  that  all-impor- 
tant quality — executive  ability.  If,  how- 
ever, the  problem  be  of  another  class,  viz., 
any  of  the  structures  found  in  our  cities 
or  the  plan  and  arrangement  of  the  cities 
themselves,  we  find  that  we  are  confront- 
ed with  quite  a  different  question.  There 
are  on  every  hand  unnatural  conditions 
which  hamper  and  restrict  us.  We  are 
brought  face  to  face  with 
that  accumulation  of 
conditions  which  is  but 
the  product  of  badly- 
governed  municipali- 
ties. 


These  accumu- 
lated conditions 
of  the  past, 
wrought  into 
precedent,  hab- 
its, laws  and  ordinances,  are  just  as  much 
a  part  of  your  program  when  you  have  to 
design  a  structure  within  our  cities  as  are 
the  physical  and  aesthetic  requirements 
imposed  by  the  owner.  If  these  attend- 
ing conditions  are  unfortunate,  if  the  laws 
and  ordinances  governing  building  be  not 
logical  and  reasonable,  if  all  of  these  be 
the  result  of  makeshift  and  temporary 
methods,  we  remain  impotent  to  create 
the  ideals  toward  which  we  have  directed 
our  study  for  many  years. 

THE  TANGLE  LEFT  US  BY  THE  PAST. 

What  is  our  relation  to  these  attend- 
ing conditions,  to  our  practice  and  to 
the  conditions  themselves?  I  shall  con- 
fine myself  almost  entirely  to  the  mu- 
nicipal problem,  for  it  is  in  the  cities  that 
most  of  us  must  live  and  labor  because  of 
the  nature  of  our  calling. 

Let  me  quote  a  paragraph  from  Walter 
Weyl's  "The  New  Democracy."  In  the 
chapter  wherein  he  traces  the  growth  of 
the  many  interests  which  have  brought 
about  the  present  political,  social,  econo- 
mic and  moral  conditions  he  says :  "Like 
the  continent,  the  city  has  been  scarred  by 
the  same  waste  and  pre-emption,  and  the 
same  insensate  optimism,  the  same  utter 
lack  of  prevision.  Cities  destined  to  be 
the  homes  of  multitudes  have  grown  up 
with  the  abandon  of  petty  villages. 
Streets  have  been  made  narrow;  parks 
have  been  forgotten;  houses  had  been 
built  upon  the  theory  of  packing-boxes; 
drainage,  water  supply,  fire  protection— 
everything  had  been  left  to  chance  and 
the  play  of  the  instinct  for  gain.  The 
theory  of  the  American  city  was  that  of 
the  pioneer's  camp.  People  were  there 
for  business.  Their  living  conditions 
must  work  out  them- 
selves." This  is  a  fair 
and  a  just  statement  of 
the  conditions  surround- 
ing our  work  in  the 
cities  of  America  todav. 


152 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


These  are  the 
conditions  which 
will  con  front  you 
upon  entering 
the  field  of  prac- 
tice. They  will  stand  as  a  Chinese  wall 
about  your  idealism  and  imagination. 

Let  us  pause  and  take  stock,  as  it 
were,  of  these  unfortunate  conditions. 
Out  of  su»Ji  an  analysis  we  may  find  th" 
key  to  this  exceedingly  difficult  problem. 
It  is  our  problem  first  to  understand 
clearly  the  aims  and  activities  of  the  gen- 
eral public  of  which  we  are  a  part ;  we 
must  also  understand  the  complex  social, 
political  and  economic  structure  of  our 
civilization,  municipal,  State  and  nation- 
al, if  we  are  to  be  a  factor  in  finding  the 
remedy.  Moreover,  it  is  the  duty  of  the 
architect  to  know  these  things,  for  it  is 
his  task  to  mould  and  unite  these  ex- 
ceedingly diverse  elements  into  a  sim- 
ple unit.  He  must  lead  through  greater 
knowledge  than  that  of  his  fellow  man ; 
at  the  same  time  l>e  must  follow.  He 
must  be  able  to  analyze  the  individual : 
must  be  able  also  to  analyze  the  power- 
ful undercurrents  of  his  time  before  he 
can  either  express  the  civilization  in 
which  he  lives  or  express  even  himself. 

Till-:    ONLY    SOURCE   OF    ART. 

Any  art  must  be  an  unconscious  ex- 
pression of  its  cause ;  a  great  art  can  only 
be  produced  through  strong,  positive 
forces  demanding  that  art.  To  say  that 
an  art  is  bad  is  saying  that  art  does  not 
exist  at  a  given  time  and  place ;  and  it  is 
likewise  true  that  a  vast  amount  of  artis- 
tic activity,  so-called,  may  go  on,  produc- 
ing nothing,  simply  because  there  may  be 
no  demand  for  that  particular  form  of 
expression  at  that  particular  time. 
Genius  is  not  individual,  but  it  is  an  in- 
dividual expression  of  what  time  has  ac- 
cumulated in  the  minds  of  men  ;  and  there 
has  never  existed  a  genius  both  out  of 
time  and  place.  Beware 
of  those  who  would  walk 
only  in  the  paths  of  the 
past  as  well  as  of  those 
who  would  work  ages 
ahead  of  their  time. 


Returning  to  the  statement  quoted,  this 
is  the  sort  of  expression  that  comes  with 
an  awakening,  and  we  already  see  in 
every  branch  of  governmental  activity 
the  acceptance  of  a  broader  policy.  As 
yet,  however,  we  have  achieved  compara- 
tively little,  and  particularly  is  this  true 
in  all  of  those  conditions  with  which  we 
are  brought  into  close  contact  in  our 
work.  The  public  as  well  as  ourselves  are 
vainly  groping  for  better  physical  condi- 
tions within  our  cities,  but  as  yet  the 
effort  amounts  to  but  little,  owing  to  the 
nature  of  the  endeavor  rather  than  the 
amount  of  work  done. 

THE  LACK  OF   CO-ORDINATION. 

There  are  many  groups  of  citizens 
working  for  the  same  end,  but  their  ef- 
forts lack  co-ordination  and  are  therefore 
void  of  any  great  effect.  Our  architect- 
ural societies  throughout  the  country 
have  been  very  active.  The  members  of 
our  societies  have  striven  hard  and  have 
worked  with  enthusiasm,  but  their  effort 
has  lacked  one  fundamental  qualitv  that 
must  needs  be  found  in  such  an  endeavor 
if  we  are  to  be  reasonably  sure  of  suc- 
cess— we  have  not  taken  the  people  into 
our  confidence  in  regard  to  the  nature  of 
the  work  which  we  have  been  doing.  If  we 
have  desired  more  progressive  legislation 
in  questions  involving  Federal  competi- 
tions or  a  better  plan  for  our  capital  city 
of  Washington,  or  if  we  have  desired 
better  tenement  house  laws  or  better  fac- 
tory regulations  or  a  more  reasonable 
building  code,  we  have  simply  gone  to  the 
committees  of  Congress,  or  to  our  State 
Legislatures,  or  to  the  Board  of  Alder- 
men in  our  cities. 

We  have  not  shown  through  our  past 
efforts  that  we  understand  the  nature  of 
our  own  problem,  for  it  does  not  appear 
that  we  have  yet  grasped  the  fundamental 
idea  that  it  is  alone  from  the  people  them- 
selves that  the  initiative  must  come  which 
will,  in  its  turn,  produce 
the  conditions  and  cre- 
ate the  laws  through 
which  our  ideals  may 
in  the  end  find  expres- 
sion. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


1.53 


We  have  not  taken  the  issues  to  the 
people  with  a  plain  statement  of  what  we 
desire  so  that  they  might  bring  pressure 
to  bear  upon  their  representatives.  We 
have  made  the  error  of  allowing  the  rank 
and  file  of  the  people  to  see  only  our  art- 
istic side.  We  have  talked  too  early  about 
the  "City  Beautiful" ;  we  have  not  put 
due  weight  upon  the  fact  that  our  aim  is 
first  to  create  the  "City  of  Common 
Sense."  We  have  not  considered  with 
them  the  penalty  which  we  are  to  pay  for 
our  present  slipshod  methods. 

THE   REAL    PROBLEM    IN    ALL    ITS    ASPECTS. 

Our  American  cities  are  confronted 
with  a  grave  problem,  a  problem  so  seri- 
ous, so  generally  acknowledged,  that  the 
people  would  respond  to  our  call  if  we 
would  but  point  the  way  in  terms  ex- 
pressive of  utility  and  economy  as  well 
as  of  beauty.  They  know  well  enough 
that  the  conditions  are  bad ;  they  have  a 
vague  idea  of  why  they  are  bad,  but  they 
do  not  know  the  remedy  to  apply.  In 
some  of  our  cities  the  time  is  approach- 
ing when  any  effort  on  the  part  of  its  citi- 
zens will  be  in  the  nature  of  locking  the 
barn  door  after  the  horse  has  been  stolen. 

As  a  result  of  the  wonderful  advance 
made  in  the  art  of  construction  during 
the  last  quarter  century,  we  have  a  con- 
dition in  our  cities  today  that  absolutely 
and  utterly  upsets  all  of  the  old  traditions 
and  customs  regarding  not  only  the  plan 
of  the  city  but  the  laws  governing  the 
erection  of  buildings  therein.  No  longer 
do  the  old  relations  and  harmony  between 
the  width  of  street,  the  size  of  block,  the 
restricted  area  for  light  and  air  within 
the  block,  the  height  of  building  upon 
the  street — no  longer  do  these  relations 
of  harmony  hold.  There  was  a  certain 
harmony  between  these  relations  which 
came  as  a  result  of  years  of  evolution. 
This  harmony  was  reasonable  and  in  the 
course  of  time  became  precedent  and 
later  was  acknowledged 
in  our  statutes  and  laws. 
In  this  old  relation  there 
was  a  certain  perma- 
nence of  value  estab- 
lished through  the  limi- 


tations of  the 
strength  of  ma- 
terials. 

It  is  this  idea 
that  has  created 
the  present  congested  condition  within  our 
cities.  The  complete  change  from  masonry 
to  steel,  when  confined  to  a  single  building, 
was  a  step  in  the  evolution  of  building, 
but  when  applied  to  a  whole  city  it  was 
more  in  the  nature  of  a  revolution.  With- 
in the  structure  itself  our  laws  acknowl- 
edged this  evolution,  but  within  the  city 
as  a  whole  they  did  not.  Streets  that  were 
wide  became  narrow  in  comparison.  The 
streets  which  cared  for  the  daily  crowds 
with  ease  have  now  become  packed  to  a 
degree  that  is  intolerable. 

I  have  spoken  of  the  "City  Beautiful" 
and  the  "City  of  Common  Sense."  In 
passing  let  me  say :  Do  not  lose  sight  of 
the  fact  that  all  the  buildings  erected 
within  our  cities  are  built  not  because  of 
any  desire  on  the  part  of  the  owner  to 
make  something  beautiful,  but  rather 
from  considerations  purely  commercial 
and  economic ;  that  as  an  architect  you 
are  bound  to  satisfy  his  desire  within  the 
limitations  of  your  own  ability,  on  the  one 
hand,  and  the  laws  and  ordinances,  on  the 
other;  that  you  cannot  work  out  in  a 
single  problem  any  of  your  general  ideals. 
Keep  in  mind  that  the  people  today  will 
not  listen  to  nor  favor  any  attempt  upon 
your  part  to  provide  the  aesthetic  alone, 
but  they  will  accept  it,  and  accept  it  glad- 
ly, if  you  can  show  them  that  it  will  come 
as  the  result  of  better  economic  condi- 
tions. Your  measure  will  be  taken  more 
often  by  this  standard  than  any  other. 

HOW    THE    PRESENT    LAWS    HINDER    A 
CONSISTENT  EXPRESSION. 

Beyond  the  questions  of  economic  con- 
struction,   we    have    in    our  cities  as  a 
framework  for  all  of  our  problems  cer- 
tain   definite   building   laws   that   are  as 
much  a  part  of  the  pro- 
gram as  the  physical  re- 
quirements.   These  laws 
have  come  to  us  through 
a  very  gradual   and   re- 
tarded process  of  evolu- 


154 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


tion  of  many 
years,  and  they 
are  so  inwrought 
into  the  life  and 
structure  of  a 
city  that  not  only  the  public  but  we 
ourselves  accept  them  as  a  perfect- 
ly natural  condition,  an  established 
precedent.  The  primary  object  of 
these  laws  is  one  of  safeguarding  in- 
dividual rights  and  providing  general  wel- 
fare, but  exactly  like  all  instruments  of 
similar  nature,  these  laws  have  not  kept 
pace  with  the  remarkable  advance  of  con- 
struction or  social  welfare  of  the  last 
quarter-century.  In  these  laws  we  have 
not  acknowledged  the  advance  of  the  new 
democracy,  the  awakening  of  this  nation 
to  a  sense  of  greater  moral  and  social  re- 
sponsibility or  the  crying  need  of  a  policy 
of  conservation  within  our  cities. 

In  our  cities  throughout  the  length 
and  breadth  of  our  land  these  laws  do 
not  insure  the  proper  light  and  air  for 
our  streets,  for  the  restricted  area  within 
the  block,  or  for  the  rooms  within  the 
buildings.  \Ye  have  towering  buildings 
of  fifty  stories  in  height  upon  streets 
sixty  feet  in  width.  We  have  lofts  and 
factories  rising  ten,  fifteen  and  twenty 
stories  in  height  with  so  little  light  and 
air  at  the  bottom  of  the  open  courts  pro- 
vided at  the  side  or  the  rear  that  we  shall 
soon  be  brought  face  to  face  with  the  old 
conditions  of  the  sweat  shop  if  we  con- 
tinue to  allow  the  erection  of  these  build- 
ings under  the  present  conditions.  \Ye 
have  apartment  houses  rising  to  an  un- 
limited height  and  covering  so  large  a 
percentage  of  the  lot  that,  where  the 
block  has  been  completely  built  up,  there 
remains  little  light  and  air  for  the  rooms 
facing  upon  the  courts  or  open  spaces 
within.  This  can  be  characterized  by  no 
other  terms  than  plain  stupidity  on  the 
part  either  of  the  city  or 
of  the  individual  own- 
ers, for  all  that  area 
within  the  block  has  lit- 
tle earning  power  com- 
pared with  what  it  might 


earn  were  the  laws  and  ordinances  so 
designed  as  to  prohibit  building  over  so 
large  an  area.  If  the  city  permits  this 
condition  to  continue,  it  is  only  a  matter 
of  time  when  we  may  again  characterize 
the  period  as  the  Dark  Ages. 

THE  STUPIDITY   OF  OUR   PRESENT   METHOD 
OF  BUILDING  CITIES. 

I  have  said  this  was  stupid  on  the  part 
of  the  city  and  also  on  the  part  of  the 
owner.  The  condition  comes  about 
through  the  activities  of  promoters  who 
select  a  portion  of  the  city  wherein  small 
buildings  only  exist ;  they  erect  there  a 
tall  loft,  office  building  or  apartment 
house,  utilizing  every  inch  of  space  al- 
lowed within  the  law,  fill  it  with  tenants 
— and  sell.  The  purchaser,  an  individual 
oft-times  who  does  not  look  to  the  fu- 
ture, sees  only  the  excellent  income  from 
the  building  and  does  not  consider  the 
fact  that  when  his  neighbors  build  in  like 
manner  they  will  take  from  him  a  large 
proportion  of  his  own  property,  which 
means  that  in  the  end  his  property  will 
not  only  shrink  in  its  earning  capacity 
but  will  also  depreciate  in  value.  This 
is  not  all.  It  leaves  his  property  for  a 
cheaper  class  of  tenants  employing  a 
cheaper  class  of  labor,  and  we  have  as  a 
result  an  anxious  landlord  and  a  great 
number  of  employees  laboring  in  the 
semi-darkness. 

This  method  of  building  our  cities  is 
foolish  and  stupid,  for  it  results  in  an 
endless  shifting  and  changing  of  the 
many  groups  of  interest  and  a  constant 
condition  of  uncertainty  as  regards  char- 
acter of  locality  and  land  values.  More- 
over, when  we  consider  that  we  are  ad- 
vancing in  our  ideas  of  industrial  jus- 
tice and  social  welfare,  it  is  pertinent  to 
ask  whether  such  a  stupid  policy  will 
not  ultimately  end  in  a  serious  deprecia- 
tion of  property,  such  as  we  already  see 
,  in  certain  sections  of  our 

cities  .  filled  with  old- 
fashioned  tenements,  of- 
fice buildings,  lofts  and 
factories.  This  method 
is  not  economical.  By 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD 


155 


this  method  of  building  we  have  ren- 
dered it  practically  impossible  to  get  any 
commensurate  value  from  a  great  num- 
ber of  lots  which  are  surrounded  by 
these  buildings  of  great  height,  which 
have  shut  off  their  neighbors  from  light 
and  air,  elements  to  which  they  have 
as  fundamental  a  right  as  they  have  to 
the  land  itself. 

If  the  owners  of  these  tall  buildings 
were  made  to  pay  their  proper  share  of 
the  construction  of  transit  facilities  ne- 
cessitated by  their  erection  and  necessary 
to  maintain  the  value  of  the  property, 
there  would  be  less  exploitation  along 
that  line  of  -development. 

THE   ELEMENT   OF    FIRE   DANGER. 

Beyond  providing  •  for  the  proper 
amount  of  light  and  air  for  the  workers 
in  factories  and  offices  and  for  the  dwell- 
ers in  tenements,  we  have  the  question  of 
protection  from  fire  to  consider.  In  this 
same  connection  should  be  considered  all 
of  the  great  class  of  other  buildings,  such 
as  department  stores,  theatres,  and  build- 
ings of  public  assemblage.  In  our  laws, 
as  now  framed,  a  proper  protection  has 
not  been  provided,  because  light  and  air 
have  not  been  conserved. 

The  violation  against  human  rights  in 
this  particular  is  flagrant  in  our  lofts 
and  department  stores.  Up  to  the  present 
we  have  been  allowed  to  build  over  vast 
areas  structures  which  not  only  pro- 
vide insufficient  means  of  exit  in  the 
case  of  fire,  but  which  allow  the  fire  to 
spread  easily  and  with  great  rapidity  over 
the  entire  area  of  building,  and  from  the 
basement  to  the  roof. 

THE  SUGGESTED  REMEDY. 

,  I  have  made  note  of  but  a  few  impor- 
tant points  wherein  our  laws  are  at  fault, 
where  they  do  not  recognize  the  prin- 
ciples of  economy,  utility  or  beauty  in 
building  our  cities.  Before  suggesting 
definite  remedial  meas- 
ures I  wish  to  consider 
the  relation  of  the  law 
and  ordinance  to  art. 
They  are  closely  relat- 
ed, in  fact,  they  are  so 


closely  related 
that  you  cannot 
separate  them  ; 
one  is  dependent 
upon  the  other. 
Through  a  knowledge  of  the  state 
of  one  you  can  easily  tell  what  is 
the  state  or  condition  of  the  other. 
I  hope  you  will  consider  well  this 
thought ;  it  is  alone  through  its  recogni- 
tion that  we  can  advance.  Look  at  our 
cities,  the  product  of  what  we  consider 
a  great  civilization.  What  is  there  in 
the  scheme  of  things  to  inspire  the  ar- 
chitect to  create,  to  invent,  just  so  long 
as  there  exists  as  the  framework  of  it 
all  our  stupid  ideas  regarding  the  con- 
servation of  our  resources,  light  and  air, 
or  our  even  more  stupid  ideas  concerning 
the  economic  use  of  the  city  block,  or 
our  utter  misconception  of  the  relation 
between  individual  and  community  right  ? 
I  tell  you  that,  so  far  as  our  art  is  con- 
cerned, we  are  working  without  a  foun- 
dation just  so  long  as  we  accept  these 
relations  without  vigorous  protest. 

From  my  point  of  view  it  matters  lit- 
tle indeed  how  we  adorn  or  drape  our 
steel  frames,  what  masks  we  place  upon 
them,  just  so  long  as  there  exist  in  our 
cities  the  conditions  which  we  see  at 
present.  The  conditions  of  our  program 
are :  A  facade  rising  hundreds  of  feet, 
forming  the  wall  of  a  narrow  canyon,  be- 
hind which  we  are  to  provide  for  thou- 
sands of  workers,  and  of  these  nearly 
half  spending  their  days  behind  windows 
opening  upon  narrow  light  wells,  hun- 
dreds of  feet  deep,  into  which  the  sun 
never  shines  and  where  the  phrase  "light 
of  day"  would  seem  but  a  mockery.  I 
ask  you,  before  I  proceed,  what  power  of 
imagination  could  make  of  such  condi- 
tions the  inspiration  for  a  work  of  art? 
Before  going  further  with  remedies 
I  wish  to  emphasize 
that,  while  these  sugges- 
tions may  appeal  to  you 
as  being  the  obvious 
remedy,  it  is  not  so  with 
the  majority  of  our  peo- 


1515 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


pie.  In  the  way 
of  all  reform 
measures  stands 
indifference  and 
a  gross  miscon- 
ception of  the  relation  of  individual  and 
community  rights.  In  giving  to  the  in- 
dividual almost  unlimited  rights,  we 
have  thought  that  he  would  thereby  be 
benefited.  As  this  has  worked  out,  it 
has  resulted  in  quite  the  opposite.  The 
rights  of  the  community  must  be  domi- 
nant, else  the  individual  will  suffer. 

/.ONES. 

Now,  of  the  schemes,  one  is  that  we 
divide  the  city  into  sections,  divisions, 
or  /ones,  restricting  each  in  such  a  way 
that  it  will  be  advantageous  to  build  only 
one  class  of  building  therein,  and  of 
course,  in  this  limitation  definitely  de- 
fining the  maximum  height  upon  the 
street  and  the  size  of  enclosed  restricted 
area  within  the  block  in  such  a  way  that 
there  will  always  be  ample  light  and  air 
for  all  rooms. 

Needless  to  say,  such  a  limitation 
should  not  only  concern  itself  with  the 
nature  of  the  occupancy,  but  it  should 
also  be  so  constructed  that  the  frightful 
congestion  of  some  of  our  streets,  such 
as  obtains  today  in  many  parts  of  our 
larger  cities,  would  not  be  possible. 

The  suggestion  of  segregation  appeals 
to  me  more  forcibly  than  any  other,  for 
it  seems  to  be  of  broader  scope.  It  is  in 
the  nature  of  a  real  city  plan,  which  has 
through  years  of  development  been  over- 
looked. It  would  tend  toward  more  per- 
manent land  values,  a  steadying  appre- 
ciation of  values,  and  toward  the  erection 
of  a  better  and  more  permanent  class  of 
buildings.  Lastly,  it  would  tend  also  to- 
ward a  greater  uniformity  of  architectur- 
al treatment  within  certain  well  defined 
zones. 

This  is  exactly  what  we  would  do  if 
we  were  writing  a  pro- 
gram for  a  new  city,  as 
was  done  in  the  compe- 
tition for  a  new  capital 
city  in  Australia ;  it  is 
what  is  being  done  in 


many  of  the  cities  of  Europe,  and  par- 
ticularly in  Germany,  where  the  people 
seem  to  have  awakened  to  the  need  of  a 
broader  conception  concerning  the  pos- 
sibilities of  our  cities,  both  as  commer- 
cial centers  and  as  places  in  which  we 
must  live. 

TENEMENT  LAWS. 

Our  tenement  laws  are  of  the  most 
vital  importance,  for  upon  the  proper 
housing  of  our  working  classes  depends 
in  a  very  large  measure  our  future  eco- 
nomic success.  Great  strides  have  been 
made  during  the  last  twenty  years  ;  better 
laws  have  been  framed  ;  better  conditions 
have  resulted.  The  solution  of  this  prob- 
lem is  not  as  yet  at  hand.  We  must  pro- 
vide that  there  will  be  cheap  land  upon 
which  these  may  be  built.  We  must  pro- 
vide a  law  that  allows  the  most  inexpen- 
sive fireproof  construction  possible.  AH 
of  the  elements  must  be  so  arranged  that 
the  occupant  can  live  in  a  fireproof,  sani- 
tary structure  which  pays  the  owner  a 
good  return.  There  are  many  groups  of 
citizens  laboring  upon  the  problem  today, 
but  the  difficulties  are  such  that  only 
through  the  most  conscientious  effort 
may  we  expect  to  find  a  solution. 

These  are  but  a  few  of  the  many  sug- 
gestions. Together  their  name  is  legion, 
but  I  hope  that  I  have  pointed  out  enough 
for  you  to  see,  in  view  of  what  I  said 
in  the  beginning,  that  there  are  attend- 
ing conditions  which  dominate  your  abil- 
ity to  create  and  design. 

Again  I  state,  it  is  not  pertinent  for  us 
to  argue  too  long  or  too  earnestly  over 
the  form  and  nature  of  structural  ex- 
pression where  there  are  fundamental 
questions,  such  as  I  have  pointed  out  to 
you,  still  to  solve. 

If  our  laws  governing  the  erection  of 
tall  buildings  were  such  that  we  could 
erect  these  tall  buildings,  never 
encroaching  upon  our  neighbors'  light 
and  air,  nor  congesting 
our  streets,  nor  jeopard- 
izing the  light  of  those 
who  dwell  or  work 
therein,  then  I  would 
say  that  we  could  right- 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL     RECORD. 


187 


U 


fully  consider  seriously  all  these  ques- 
tions of  structural  expression.  As  it 
stands,  such  argument  and  discussion  are 
but  a  waste  of  time,  for  while  we  might 
be  able  to  make  our  new  city  interesting, 
the  very  fact  that  it  is  not  sound  eco- 
nomically or  built  with  a  proper  consid- 
eration of  conservation  makes  the  idea 
that  it  may  be  beautiful  an  absurd  as- 
sumption. 

THE    DANGER    OF    CONSIDERING    ONLY    THE 
SINGLE    PROBLEM. 

The  major  part  of  your  time  and  the 
greatest  interest  in  your  endeavor  centers 
around  specific  and  definite  problems  hav- 
ing both  paper  programs  and  paper  lim- 
itations. Through  the  constant  exercise 
of  certain  faculties  in  your  endeavor  to 
solve  your  problems,  and  the  repeated 
application  of  certain  principles  which 
you  are  taught  in  the  school,  you  grow 
gradually  to  feel  that  architecture  is  close- 
ly related  to  an  abstruse  science  and  also 
that  the  art  which  is  therein  can  only 
appear  as. resultant  of  your  own  person- 
ality. Always  it  is  the  single  problem 
which  engages  your  attention,  and  there- 
fore the  building  or  the  group  of  build- 
ings becomes  a  measure,  as  it  were,  of  its 
designer..  Its  plan  appears  to  be  the  re- 
sult of  his  ingenuity,  its  character  and 
expression  the  result  of  his  cleverness. 

Your  whole  training  keeps  your  mind 
well  within  certain  limitations/  Your  in- 
spiration comes  through  a  study  of  the 
results  of  conditions  and  not  from  condi- 
tions themselves ;  you  learn  to  make  use 
of  elements  which  you  find  in  books  and 
to  vary  these  elements  to  meet  and  satisfy 
certain  fixed  conditions  imposed  upon 
you,  with  the  result  that  you  grow  natur- 
ally to  look  upon  architecture  as  a  per- 
sonal achievement,  simply  the  result  of 
individual  effort  applied  to  a  particular 
problem  rather  than,  as  I  suggested  be- 
fore, an  expression  of 
constantly  changing 
forces. 

You  try,  and  you  use 
our  own  terms,  to  define 
an  architecture  expres- 


sive of  our  day, 

and  you  conclude 

that      we      have 

failed ;  but  when 

you   try   to    put 

into  words  your  vague  ideas  of  what  it 

should  be,  or  to  create  with  your  pencil 

an  image  which   will   express   the  thing 

after  which  you  are  groping,  the  result 

on  the  one  hand  is  simply  words,  and  on 

the  other  a  graphic  imitation  of  an  old 

form. 

Coming  fresh  from  school,  with  its  as- 
sociations, its  traditions  and  the  material 
in  the  library,  you  realize,  as  do  we  all, 
that  there  is  a  vast  amount  of  ugliness 
in  the  world  today,  and  it  is  easy  for  you 
to  attribute  this  to  an  utten  lack  of  taste 
on  the  part  of  our  people.  You  straight- 
away divide  our  people  into  two  divis- 
ions :  We,  the  architects,  the  artists,  and 
they,  the  great  mass  of  people  of  all 
classes  who  should  be  taught  to  under- 
stand. You  see  before  you  the  problem 
and  you  say  "we  must  educate  them," 
and  your  method  is  this :  You  would 
gradually  educate  them  by  example, 
showing  them  beautiful  designs  and  com- 
positions of  your  own  standard  of  art 
and  beauty,  designs  which  you  would 
evolve  from  your  minds  in  the  studio. 

THE  DIRECTION   IN    WHICH    WE    MUST  GO. 

In  conclusion  let  me  suggest  that  if  a 
remedy  is  to  be  found  for  these  condi- 
tions much  depends  upon  you.  I  take  it 
for  granted  that  each  of  you  desires  the 
better  conditions  suggested,  and  I  say  this 
to  you :  Better  conditions  will  obtain, 
your  ideals  will  be  satisfied,  and  you  will 
be  responsible  for  better  conditions  just 
in  proportion  as  you  exercise  the  powers 
and  perform  the  duties  of  citizenship  in 
your  community.  You  may  indulge  in 
flights  of  fancy  if  you  like,  but  do  not 
forget  the  fact  that  it  is  through  the  exer- 
ciseofthe  franchise  alone 
that  there  can  be  obtained 
for  your  program  the 
conditions  absolutely  ne- 
cessary for  the  working 
out  of  your  ideals. 


158 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


In  our  cities  to- 
day there  are  many 
societies,  and  groups 
of  individuals  ambi- 
tious for  better  so- 
cial, economic,  phy- 
sical and  political 
conditions.  When 
you  consider  carefully  the  work  they  arc 
doing  you  will  be  surprised  to  find  that 
they  are  in  the  main  working  for  the  bet- 
terment of  our  architectural  programs, 
in  other  words,  they  are  striving  for  our 
ideals.  In  the  work  of  the  many  societies 
laboring  for  better  housing,  better  fire 
protection,  better  sanitary  conditions  in 
stores,  lofts  and  factories,  greater  safety 
and  the  reduction  of  congestion  in  our 
streets,  the  development  of  civic  centers 
and  the  general  aesthetic  development  of 
the  city,  we  see  but  the  furtherance  of 
our  aims.  In  the  work  of  the  American 
Institute  of  Architects  and  other  archi- 
tectural societies  there  is  the  same  field 
open  to  you  for  service.  In  our  own 
publications  and  in  the  daily  press, 
through  which  alone  we  may  hope  to  con- 
sider this  matter  with  the  people  at  large, 
a  great  and  as  yet  'almost  undeveloped 


field  is  open  to  us, 
provided  we  can 
but  come  to  real- 
ize the  importance 
of  considering  ser- 
iously subjects  of 
this  sort  with  the 
people. 

I  have  but  pointed  the  direction.  I 
know  very  well  that  I  cannot  bring  these 
great  problems  fully  home  to  you ;  but  I 
want  you  to  remember  when  you  feel  the 
conditions  of  practice  choking  your  spirit, 
that  there  is  a  field  of  labor  outside  your 
offices  and  that  there  are  problems  which 
go  far  beyond  your  powers  to  solve  in 
terms  of  steel  and  stone  alone.  In  this 
broader  field  of  service  you  are  building 
into  future  ages,  a  spiritual  structure  last- 
ing centuries  beyond  the  life  of  material 
forms.  If  you,  through  your  endeavor, 
after  you  have  studied  well  and  come  to 
understand  the  problems,  can  take  this 
message  to  the  people  and  so  state  it  that 
they  will  understand,  then  you  will  have 
achieved  not  only  your  right  to  your  title 
of  Architect,  but  a  right  also  to  the  full 
significance  of  that  far  greater  title — 
Citizen. 


SOUTH    FRONT-CLIVEDEN,   GERMANTOWN,    PHILADELPHIA. 


THREE  TYPES  OF 


GEORGIAN  ARCHITECTVRE 

Evolutions  of  the ftyfe  in  Tbiladelphia 
By  Harold  Donalclfon  Eberlein 


PART  II.* 


ANOTHER  house  of  the  second  Geor- 
gian type  is  Mt.  Pleasant,  or  Clunie, 
as  it  was  at  first  called,  in  Fair- 
mount   Park,  built  in    1761   by   Captain 
John  Macpherson,  and  in  later  years  the' 
home  of  Benedict  Arnold.    Mt.  Pleasant 
is  a  structure  of  almost  baronial  aspect, 
with  east  and  west  fronts  alike  of  impos- 
ing mien. 

A  high  foundation  of  carefully  squared 
stones  is  pierced  by  iron-barred  base- 
ment windows  set  in  stone  frames. 
Above  this  massive,  grisly  base  the  thick 
stone  walls  are  coated  with  yellow-grey 
ronehcast.  Heavy  quoins  of  brick  at  the 

*NOTE. — The    first   part    of    this    article    was   pub- 
lished in  July,  1913. 


corners,  and,  at  the  north  and  south  ends 
of  the  building,  great  quadruple  chimneys 
joined  into  one  at  the  top  by  arches, create 
an  air  of  more  than  usual  solidity.  A 
broad  flight  of  stone  steps,  their  iron  bal- 
ustrades overgrown  with  a  bushy  mass  of 
honeysuckle,  leads  up  to  a  doorway  of 
generous  breadth.  The  pillars  at  each 
side  of  the  door  and  the  superimposed 
pediment,  the  ornate  Palladian  window 
immediately  above  on  the  second  floor 
and,  above  that  again,  the  corniced  pedi- 
ment springing  from  the  eaves,  all  con- 
tribute to  set  a  stamp  of  courtly  distinc- 
tion upon  the  pile. 

Above  the  second  floor  the  hipped  roof 
springs,  pierced   east  and   west  by   two 


160 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


161 


graceful  dormers  and  crowned  by  a  well 
turned  balustrade  that  traverses  nearly 
the  whole  distance  between  the  chimneys. 
The  fan-light  over  the  door  has  remark- 
ably heavy,  fluted  mullions  and  much 
of  the  detail  throughout  the  house, 
though  highlv  wrought,  is  heavy.  The 
two  flanking  outbuildings,  set  thirty  or 
forty  feet  distant  from  the  northeast  and 
southeast  corners  of  the  house,  designed 
for  servants'  quarters  and  domestic  of- 
fices, give  Mt.  Pleasant  a  peculiarly  strik- 
ing appearance.  Without  them  it  would 
be  only  an  unusually  handsome  Georgian 
country  house,  with  them  it  at  once  takes 
on  the  manorial  port  'df  one  of  the  old 
Virginia  mansions.  The  interior  wood-, 
work,  both  upstairs  and  down,  is  rich  in 
elaboration  of  detail  and  the  door-frames, 
with  their  heavily  moulded  pediments,  are 
exceptional. 

Cliveden,  the  third  member  of  the  sec- 
ond group,  was  built  in  1761  by  Chief 
Justice  Chew.  Its  solid  and  heavy  mas- 
onry is  of  carefully  dressed  Gennantown 
stone,  and  at  the  peaks  of  the  gables  and 
corners  of  the  roof  are  great  stone  urns. 
Back  of  the  house  are  two  wings,  one 
semi-detached  and  the  other  entirely  so, 
used  for  servants'  quarters  and  domestic 
offices.  All  the  features  and  detail  about 
Cliveden  are  thoroughly  in  keeping  with 
the  same  characteristics  of  the  other  two 
houses  already  described. 

The  windows  are  broad  and  fill  a  great 
part  of  the  wall  space  in  the  faqade  and 
the  doorway  is  a  central  feature  that  has 
been  made  the  most  of  by  the  architect. 
Both  indoors  and  out  the  strongly  clas- 
sic feeling  has  been  emphasized  in  pil- 
lar and  pediment,  pilaster  and  entabla- 
ture. Triglyphs,  guttae  and  all  other 
details  of  classic  embellishment  have  been 
wrought  with  the  nice  precision  due  a 
worthy  subject. 

Comparing  Whitby,  Mt.  Pleasant  and 
Cliveden  with  the  former  houses  of  the 
first  Georgian  type,  certain  differences 
at  once  strike  us.  The  whole  aspect  is 
changed  by  the  greater  breadth  of  win- 
dows and  doors.  The  houses  look 
wider  awake.  This  change  in  the  size 
of  the  windows  means,  of  course,  that  the 
rooms  within  in  most  cases  were  lighter 
and  more  cheerful  than  before.  Then, 


too,  the  Palladian  window  has  appeared. 
Both  Mt.  Pleasant  and  Cliveden  afford 
good  examples,  Cliveden's  being  placed 
at  the  side,  while  at  Mt.  Pleasant  it  forms 
an  important  feature  in  both  the  east  and 
west  fronts. 

At  Mt.  Pleasant  and  Cliveden  we 
see  that  the  door  has  become  a  sub- 
ject for  elaborate  treatment,  quite  in  con- 
trast to  the  extremely  simple  and  unas- 
suming manner  of  dealing  with  the  same 
feature  in  the  earlier  houses.  At  Mt. 
Pleasant  the  severity  of  the  roof  line  is 
tempered  by  a  balustrade  and  the  effec- 
tive management  of  the  chimneys,  while 
at  Whitby  and  Cliveden  urns  embellish 
the  peaks  and  corners.  Within  we  find 
that  acanthus  leaves  and  thistles  have  be- 
gun to  grow,  the  rose  has  blossomed, 
other  conventional  flowers  and  foliage 
have  budded  and  egg  and  dart  mouldings 
have  appeared.  In  other  words,  carving 
as  a  mode  of  embellishment  has  attained 
an  established  vogue.  The  moulding  pro- 
files have  lost  some  of  their  trenchant 
boldness,  and  though  the  ornamental  de- 
tail, both  indoors  and  out,  is  still  vigor- 
ous, and  at  times  massive,  there  is  gen- 
erally visible  an  air  of  delicacy  and  re- 
finement not  present  before. 

The  Woodlands,  the  Highlands  and 
Upsala  exemplify  for  us  the  third  type 
of  Georgian.  William  Hamilton  built 
the  Woodlands  about  1770,  Anthony 
Morris  finished  the  Highlands  in  1796, 
and  Norton  Johnson  began  Upsala  in 
1798  and  completed  it  three  years  later. 
Across  the  north  front  of  the  Woodlands, 
at  regular  intervals,  are  six  Ionic  pilasters 
above  whose  tops  runs  an  entablature 
whose  frieze  is  adorned  with  paterae  and 
fluting,  the  whole  surmounted  by  a  pedi- 
ment. Before  the  house  is  a  low  and 
broad  paved  terrace  filling  the  space  be- 
tween the  semi-circular  bays  that  project 
from  the  ends  of  the  building.  Between 
the  two  middle  pilasters  a  round-arched 
doorway  with  a  fan-light  opens  into  the 
hall.  On  the  south  or  river  front  a  flight 
of  steps  ascends  to  a  lofty  white-pillared 
portico,  from  which  a  door  or>ens  direct- 
ly into  the  oval-shaped  ballroom. 

In  another  respect  the  whole  exterior 
aspect  of  the  Woodlands  is  different  from 
that  of  houses  of  the  second  type.  Win- 


162 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


From    "Colonial    Homes    of    Philadelphia,"   by    H.  D.  Eberlcin  and  H.  M.  Lippincott ;  J  B.   Lippincott  Co. 
PARLOR  OF  WHITBY  HALL,  KINGSESSING,  PHILADELPHIA.    BUILT  IN  1754. 


dow  treatment  is  always  a  most  impor- 
tant item  in  determining  architectural 
character,  and  it  is  just  here  that  a  sig- 
nificant change  is  to  be  noted.  The  size 
of  the  opening  is,  in  some  cases,  the 
same,  in  others  it  is  larger  but,  more  no- 
ticeable still,  the  muntins  are  far  smaller 
and  we  lose  the  bold,  trenchant  barring 
of  white  that  emphasizes  the  aspect  of 
windows  in  the  earlier  buildings. 

The  interior  is  finished  with  all  the 
delicacy  that  one  might  expect,  judging 
from  the  evidences  of  Adam  influence 
without.  One  highly  significant  feature 
of  interior  treatment  in  the  houses  of 
the  third  type  is  the  change  made  in  the 
arrangement  of  the  mantels.  We  have 
seen  that  in  houses  of  the  first  type, 
such  as  Graeme  Park,  and  in  houses  of 
the  second  type,  such  as  Whitby  Hall 
or  Mt.  Pleasant,  the  overmantel  panel- 
ling and  embellishment  were  accorded 
much  care  and  elaboration.  The  chim- 
ney breast  often  extended  a  considera- 
ble distance  into  the  room  and  the  orna- 


mental superstructure  above  the  fireplace 
reached  all  the  way  to  the  ceiling. 

Although  these  ornate  overmantels 
reaching  to  the  ceiling  had  begun  to  fall 
into  disfavor  in  England  a  little  after 
the  middle  of  the  eighteenth  century, 
when  houses  of  the  second  Georgian 
type  were  being  erected  in  the  Philadel- 
phia neighborhood,  Colonial  conserva- 
tism disregarded  the  newer  style  and 
clung  to  the  mode  approved  by  time- 
honored  precedent.  The  fireplace  with 
its  setting  has  always  held  a  position  of 
such  exalted  honor  as  the  centre  of 
family  life  that  the  following  extract 
from  Clouston's  treatise  on  Chippendale 
is  particularly  illuminating  in  this  con- 
nection. In  speaking  of  the  influence 
exerted  by  Sir  William  Chambers  on 
architecture  as  well  as  furniture,  he 
says,  "when  he  returned  to  England  in 
1755  [from  the  Continent]  he  was  ac- 
companied by  Wilton  and  Cipriani,  aft- 
erwards so  well  known  as  an  artist  and 
decorator.  He  also  brought  Italian 


THE  ARCHITECTURAL  RECORD. 


163 


MANTEL  DETAIL— WHITE Y  HALL,  K1NGSESSING,- PHILADELPHIA. 
An   Example  of  the  "Second  Type"   of  Georgian. 


sculptors  to  carve  the  marble  mantel- 
pieces he  introduced  into  English  houses. 

"These  were  made  from  his  own  de- 
signs, and  the  ornament  of  figures, 
scrolls  and  foliage  was  free  in  character. 
Strange  to  say,  these  mantelpieces,  de- 
signed and  made  by  an  architect,  were 
yet  the  means  of  taking  away  this  im- 
portant part  of  interior  decoration  from 
the  hands  of  the  architect  altogether  and 
causing  it  to  become  quite  a  separate 
production,  made  and  sold  along  with 
the  grates. 

"In  former  times  it  had  been,  an  inte- 
grant portion  of  the  rooms,  reaching 
from  floor  to  ceiling,  balanced  and  made 
part  of  the  wall  by  having  its  main  lines 
carried  round  in  panelling  and  enriched 
friezes.  It  was  the  keynote  of  decora- 
tion, and  the  master  builder  of  the  times 
grew  fanciful  and  exerted  his  utmost 


skill  upon  its  carving  and  quaint  im- 
agery, centralizing  the  whole  ornament 
of  the  room  around  this  household 
shrine. 

''Mantelpieces  had  gradually  come 
down  in  height,  though  still  retaining 
much  of  their  fine  proportion  and  classic 
design.  Many  causes  had  contributed  to 
this,  the  chief  being  the  disuse  of  wood 
panelling  and  the  preference  given  to 
hangings  of  damask,  foreign  leather  and 
wall  paper.  In  the  reigns  of  Queen 
Anne  and  the  Little  Dutchman  the  cus- 
tom of  panelling  was  partially  kept  up, 
but  the  lining  was  only  white  painted 
deal,  after  the  fashion  in  Holland.  At 
this  time  the  upper  part  of  the  chimney- 
piece  was  still  retained,  but  only  reached 
about  half-way  up  the  wall.  Gibbs, 
Kent  and  Ware  kept  the  superstructure 
as  much  as  they  could,  but  Sir  William 


164 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


THE  ARCHITECTURAL  RECORD. 


165 


WEST  FRONT— MOUNT  PLEASANT,  PHILA- 
DELPHIA. BUILT  1761.  AN  EXAMPLE  OF 
THE  "SECOND  TYPE"  OF  .  GEORGIAN. 


168 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


~       -      • 
EAST  FRONT— MOUNT  PLEASANT,  PHILADELPHIA 


From  "Colonial  Homes  of  Philadelphia." 

WEST  FRONT— MOUNT  PLEASANT,   PHILADELPHIA. 


41 


DETAIL  OF  WOODWORK- 
GREAT  CHAMBER,  MOUNT 
PLEASANT,  PHILADELPHIA. 


S  T  A  I  R  W  A  Y-M  O  U  N  T 
PLEASANT.    PHILADELPHIA 


PARLOR  —  MOUNT 
PLEASANT,    PHILADELPHIA 


172 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


DETAIL  OF  NORTH   FRONT— THE  WOOD- 
LANDS, PHILADELPHIA. 

Chambers  dealt  it  the  most  crushing 
blow  it  had  yet  received  by  copying  the 
later  French  and  Italian  styles  and  giv- 
ing minute  detail  more  consideration 
than  fine  proportion.  He  discarded  the 


upper  part  altogether  and  helped  to 
make  'continued  chimney  pieces'  things 
of  the  past." 

The  jmich  used  Adam  oval  found  ex- 
pression even  in  the  shapes  of  rooms 
and,  besides  the  oval  ball-room  at  the 
Woodlands,  we  frequently  find  in  houses 
of  the  third  type  rounded  or  elliptical 
hallways  and  chambers. 

At  the  Highlands,  in  the  Whitemarsh 
Valley,  we  see  the  front  of  the  house 
adorned  with  tall  Ionic  pilasters  rising 
from  base  course  to  cornice,  which  is  it- 
self elaborately  wrought.  The  wood- 
work inside  is  excellent,  but  unfortunate- 
ly the  Adam  mantels  with  their  compo 
decoration,  have  been  removed  and  now 
grace  another  house  some  miles  distant. 
At  Upsala,  in  Germantown,  however,  we 
are  in  better  luck,  for  there  the  Adam 
mantels  have  remained  untouched.  The 
illustrations  show  the  rest  of  the  house 
sufficiently  to  make  further  specific  com- 
ment unnecessary,  save  to  remark,  re- 
garding the  windows,  that  here,  as  in 
other  houses  of  this  latest  type,  larger 
panes  of  glass  than  in  the  two  earlier 
types  are  met  with  in  not  a  few  instances. 

Before  proceeding  further  in  the 
course  of  comparison,  a  word  ought  to 
be  said  about  the  color  of  the  paint  used 
for  the  interior  woodwork  of  the  Geor- 
gian houses  of  all  three  types.  For  some 
reason  there  seems  to  be  an  impression 
abroad  that  white  was  employed  to  the 
exclusion  of  everything  else.  There 
was,  it  is  true,  a  preponderance  of  white, 
but  its  use  was  by  no  means  universal. 
A  close  examination  of  successive  lay- 
ers of  paint  on  some  old  woodwork  re- 
veals various  shades  of  greys,  blues, 
drabs,  brownish  yellows  and  other  hues 
beneath  one  or  more  coats  of  white. 
Grey  seems  to  have  been  one  of  the 
earliest  variants  from  white  and,  in  some 
places,  nothing  else  was  ever  used.  At 
Graeme  Park,  for  instance,  the  first  coat 
of  paint  was  grey  and  no  other  color 
ever  adorned  its  panelling  and  door  and 
window  trims.  At  Stenton,  on  the  other 
hand,  the  taste  of  the  occupants  dictated 
a  change  of  color  from  time  to  time, 
and  we  find  a  good  deal  of  variety  in  the 
successive  coats.  During  the  prevalence 
of  the  second  Georgian  type  white  seems 


NORTH  DOOR-THE  WOODLANDS,  PHILA- 
DELPHIA. BUILT  ABOUT  1770.  AN  EXAMPLE 
OF  THE  "THIRD  TYPE"  OF  GEORGIAN. 


174 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


to  have  found  more  general  favor.  With 
our  last  type  delicate  colors  again  be- 
gan to  be  used. 

Contrasting  the  Woodlands,  the  High- 
lands and  Upsala  with  the  houses  illus- 
trating the  second  Georgian  type,  we  find 
still  further  evidences  of  architectural 
evolution.  During  the  prevalence  of  the 
second  type  individual  features  were  sin- 
gled out  for  decorative  emphasis,  but  in 
the  days  of  the  third  type  the  entire  front 
of  a  house  or  sometimes  the  whole  ex- 
terior was  regarded  from  a  decorative 
point  of  view.  At  Cliveden  the  treat- 
ment of  the  doorway  and  the  urns  on 
the  roof  are  the  features  relied  upon 
for  the  embellishment  of  the  fagade.  At 
Mt.  Pleasant  the  doorways  of  the  east 
and  west  fronts,  the  Palladian  windows 
above  them,  the  balustrade  on  the  roof 
and  tlie  treatment  of  the  chimneys  sup- 
ply a  fuller  and  more  ornate  decorative 
effect.  But  when  we  reach  the  third 
period  we  see  that  the  architect  has  con- 
sidered carefully  the  decorative  element 
in  both  the  proportions  and  detail  of  the 
whole  building.  Tt  would  be  hard  to  be- 
lieve that  the  designer  of  the  Woodlands, 
in  drawing  his  plans,  had  not  carefully 
aimed  at  the  pleasing  ensemble  of  his 
masses.  The  effect  of  the  rounded  ends 
is  agreeable,  and  a  marked  departure 
from  the  straightforward  rectangularity 
of  most  of  the  houses  of  preceding  types. 
The  lofty  portico  of  the  Woodlands' 
south  or  river  front  had  no  precedent  in 
Philadelphia.  Vaux  Hill  or  Fatland, 
erected  about  the  same  time,  and  Lou- 
doun,  a  few  years  later,  had  the  same 
motif,  and  even  John  Bartram,  in  his 
last  addition  to  his  house,  adopted  the 
same  treatment.  Neither  was  there  a 
precedent  for  the  method  of  dealing  with 
the  north  front,  so  we  see  that  the  Wood- 
lands struck  two  new  notes  in  local  ar- 
chitecture. 

At  the  Woodlands  and  the  Highlands 
we  find  pilasters  carried  the  full  height 
of  the  walls — a  new  feature.  The  fenes- 
tration  is  arranged  with  more  regard  to 
outward  appearance  and  not  solely  from 
a  utilitarian  point  of  view.  We  find  that 
the  high  panelled  overmantels  which  con- 
stituted an  important  architectural  fea- 
ture had  given  place  to  the  low  and  elab- 


orately adorned  mantel  that  ought  to  be 
regarded  rather  as  a  piece  of  furniture 
than  an  architectural  entity.  Fireplaces 
had  grown  smaller.  Fan-lights  above 
doors  had  become  common  and  were  en- 
riched with  beautiful  and  sometimes  in- 
tricate metal  tracery.  The  comparison  be- 
tween these  later  fan-lights,  with  their 
airy  grace,  and  the  earlier  fan-lights  of 
Mt.  Pleasant,  with  their  ponderous  mul- 
lions,  is  instructive.  In  the  detail  of  all 
ornament  heaviness  has  vanished  and  the 
polished  elegance  of  Adam  influence  has 
taken  its  place.  Everywhere  we  find 
paterae,  drops  and  swags,  fluting  and 
quilling,  oval  fans  and  dainty  urns  and 
vases  with  delicate  leaf  and  flower  treat- 
ment. 

Regarding  the  texture  of  stone  walls, 
we  ought  also  to  note  that  in  the  second 
and  third  types  we  find  neatly  squared 
and  dressed  stones  used  to  a  considerable 
extent.  At  Cliveden,,  the  Highlands  and 
Upsala  the  fronts  alone  are  of  cut  stone, 
while  at  Whitby  Hall  the  walls  on  all 
sides  are  treated  with  the  same  formal 
precision. 

Briefly  summing  up,  then,  it  is  clear 
that-  three  distinct  types  exist.  The  first 
has  Queen  Anne  affinities,  but  is  Geor- 
gian in  time  and  much  of  its  feeling. 
Ornamental  detail  is  simple  and  bold  and 
at  times  a  trifle  heavy.  The  profiles  of 
mouldings  are  strong  and  in  high  relief. 
Simplicity  and  strength,  combined  with 
grace,  give  the  prevailing  note  in  every 
instance.  The  second  type  is  lighter 
and  more  ornate,  but,  with  characteris- 
tic conservatism  and  abhorrence  of  the 
new-fangled  whims  of  Sir  William 
Chambers  and  the  Brothers  Adam,  Phila- 
delphia adhered  to  the  modes  in  vogue  in 
England  from  twenty-five  to  fifty  years 
before  and  kept  Ware  in  countenance, 
who,  in  1750,  was  still  crowning  his  build- 
ings with  heavy  Queen  Anne  urns. 

Notwithstanding  this  staunch  adher- 
ence to  conservative  architectural  prin- 
ciples, however,  a  new  feeling  is  every- 
where perceptible.  Though  the  over- 
mantel decorations  still  extended  all  the 
way  to  the  ceiling,  the  character  of  the 
ornamentation  employed  was  vastly  more 
elaborate  and  graceful  than  anything  to 
be  found  in  buildings  of  the  first  type. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 

- 

i  *» 


175 


SOUTH  OR  RIVER  FRONT-THE   WOODLANDS,  PHILADELPHIA. 


If  the  profiles  of  mouldings  were  not  so 
bold  and  insistent  they  were,  neverthe- 
less, quite  as  graceful.  With  the  ad- 
vent of  floriated  and  foliated  motifs  in 
the  carving  we  naturally  find  a  closer 
care  to  detail  of  all  kinds.  At  the  same 
time  there  is  to  be  seen  a  more  punctil- 
ious heed  to  all  the  little  niceties  and 
characteristic  distinctions  between  the 
classic  orders. 

By  the  time  our  third  Georgian  type 
appears  Adam  influence  has  become 
paramount  and  put  to  flight  all  mid- 
Georgian  ponderosity.  Even  in  the  cases 
of  manifestly  "carpenter-built"  houses  of 
the  period  where,  quite  unlike  the  three 
excellent  examples  which  were  chosen  to 
represent  their  particular  classes,  no  es- 
pecial architectural  merit  is  to  be  looked 
for,  we  find  no  heaviness  of  line  and  the 
character  of  ornamentation  employed  is 
distinctly  either  a  copy  or  an  echo  of 
Adam  motifs  and  in  not  a  few  cases  has 
caught  much  of  their  spirit. 

It  must  be  understood  that  the  houses 
used  for  illustration  have  been  chosen 
because  they  represent  their  many  con- 
temporaries in  the  same  neighborhood, 
all  of  which  display  the  same  character- 


istics according  to  the  dates  at  which  they 
were  built.  The  foregoing  analysis  does 
not  pretend  to  be  complete  —  it  would 
take  far  more  space  to  trace  all  the  sub- 
tleties of  the  subject — but  aims  only  to 
direct  attention  to  certain  facts  that  may 
conduce  to  clearer  understanding  of 
American  Georgian  and  its  resources  in 
supplying  our  present  needs. 

In  considering  the  variations  between 
the  Georgian  types  of  the  Philadelphia 
neighborhood,  it  must  be,  borne  in  mind 
that  they  ought  not  to  be  judged  too 
strictly  by  contemporary  work  in  Eng- 
land. Such  comparison  would  only  be 
misleading  and  unfair  for  several  rea- 
sons. In  the  first  place,  at  the  beginning 
of  the  Georgian  period,  local  conditions 
forbade  the  lavish  display  of  carved  or- 
namentation that  marked  so  many  houses 
of  the  same  date  in  England.  At  that 
time  there  were  few  craftsmen  in  the 
Colonies  capable  of  executing  the  elabo- 
rate carving  in  vogue  on  the  other  side 
of  the  Atlantic.  The  builders  of  man- 
sions, therefore,  must  perforce  content 
themselves  by  a  close  adherence  to  lines 
and  proportion  and  do  without  the  highly 
wrought  carved  embellishment.  Then, 


176 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


too,  besides  this  difficulty,  many  of  the 
builders  of  these  early  houses  belonged 
to  the  Society  of  Friends  and  from 
their  religious  principles  they  were  averse 
to  a  wealth  of  ornament. 

In  the  second  place,  judgment  by  con- 
temporary English  standards  would  be 
misleading,  because  at  the  time  the  sec- 
ond Philadelphia  Georgian  type  began  to 
flourish,  and  the  means  and  inclination 
for  elaborate  ornament  were  both  pres-. 
ent,  Colonial  conservatism  had  become 
an  important  factor  in  the  dictation  of 
styles  and,  however  closely  Philadel- 
phians  might  copy  the  current  modes  of 
London  in  matters  of  dress,  in  their 


manners  and  architecture  they  chose  to 
cling  to  well  established  precedent  and 
always  remained  thenceforward  from 
twenty  to  thirty-five  years  back  of  their 
British  cousins  in  the  method  of  their 
architectural  expression.  Hence,  for  in- 
stance, overmantels  reaching  to  the  ceil- 
ing were  built  as  late  as  1765.  In  all  its 
phases,  however,  Philadelphia  Georgian, 
whatever  minor  differences  there  might 
have  been,  was  true  to  the  traditions 
of  the  great  English  architects  and  be- 
cause of  its  purity  of  style  is  worthy 
of  close  study  to-day  for  the  vital  in- 
spiration it  can  supply  to  our  own  gene- 
ration. 


EAST   FRONT-UPSALA,  GERMANTOWN,   PHILADELPHIA. 
An   Example  of  the  "Third  Type"  of  Georgian. 


Some  Recent  Interiors 


Thornton  Chard 


Library,    Residence  qf 
Dave  H.Morris,Es£  NewYork 


182 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


DINING  ROOM-RESIDENCE  OF  DAVE  H.  MORRIS,  ESQ.,  NEW  YORK  CITY. 
Thornton  Chard,  Architect. 


DINING  ROOM— RESIDENCE  OF  DAVE  H.  MORRIS,  ESQ.,  NEW  YORK  CITY. 
Thornton  Chard,  Architect. 


/fa 


—  .        __ ..        ,     .    ... -.-••' 

ACHITECT'S    LIBRARY 


TWO  BOOKS  BY  PRACTICAL  THEORISTS 

By  RICHARD  FRANZ  BACH 

Curator,  School  of  Architecture,  Columbia  University 


PART  II. 


THE  utterances  of  Professor  Cram 
of  the  Massachusetts  Institute  of 
Technology  are  not  to  be  taken 
lightly.  He  is  a  thinker  of  discernment 
and  brings  to  his  work  a  varied  experi- 
ence, making  contact  with  the  world  of 
art  at  many  points.  His  mind  is  an  ad- 
mirable crucible  in  which  this  experience 
tempers  theory  and  produces  wisdom.  In 
The  Ministry  of  Art  (Houghton,  Mifflin ; 
8vo,  $1.50)  Mr.  Cram  has  brought  to- 
gether a  number  of  papers  upon  a  series 
of  topics  ranging  from  the  purely  theo- 
retic essay  "Art  the  Revealer"  to  the 
historical  and  critical  "American  Uni- 
versity Architecture."  But  though  there 
may  be  diversity  of  title  there  is  in  all 
of  these  discussions  a  unity  of  purpose — 
a  purpose  common  to  all  artists  and 
shunned  by  many  of  their  number — 
namely  that  of  teaching,  a  mission  which 
a  person  of  sterling  worth  in  the  fine 
arts  cannot  well  avoid.  But  few  of  us 
play  our  "full  part  in  God's  cosmogony" 
and  it  is  to  assure  us  that  we  have  yet 
much  to  attain  before  satisfying  that  full 
part  that  Mr.  Cram  sets  out  to  clothe  art, 
and  inferentially  artists,  with  the  proper 


ministerial  dignity.  Early  in  his  book  he 
quotes  Protagoras :  "Man  is  the  meas- 
ure of  all  things"  and  cannot  resist  the 
epigram :  "Art  is  the  measure  of  man." 
But  let  us  first  examine  the  avowed 
purpose  of  this  volume ;  we  find  it  defi- 
nitely stated  in  the  first  few  pages.  For 
instance :  ".  .  .  by  the  words  'The 
Ministry  of  Art'  I  mean  that  function 
which  I  think  art  has  performed,  and  al- 
ways can  perform,  as  an  agency  working 
toward  the  redemption  of  human  char- 
acter; and  in  this  aspect  .  .  it  takes 
on  something  of  that  quality  which 
characterizes  ministers  of  the  Christian 
Church.  .  .  And  this  I  conceive 
to  be  the  highest  function  of  the  artist 
and  the  art  that  is  his  agency  of  opera- 
tion. Not  that  I  would  for  a  moment 
make  this  an  exclusive  property;  art  has 
sufficient  reason  for  existence  in  its  qual- 
ity as  a  creator  of  simple,  sensuous  joy 
and  refreshment,  as  a  beneficent  force 
expressing  itself  through  .  .  pure 
beauty.  .  .  Art  may  do  more  than 
make  life  beautiful,  in  that  it  can  act 
symbolically,  tropically,  sacramentally, 
and  so  become  the  supreme  means  of 


188 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


expressing  and  of  inciting  and  exalting, 
those  emotions  which  transcend  experi- 
ence and  may  not  in  any  degree  find 
voice  through  those  channels  of  expres- 
sion which  are  entirely  adequate  for  the 
purposes  of  the  intellect." 

We  may  sum  up  in  a  few  words  the 
burden  of  the  first  paper,  entitled  "Art 
the  Revealer,"  delivered  at  the  inaugu- 
ration of  Rice  Institute,  Houston,  Texas. 
Mr.  Cram  considers  art  "an  indispensa- 
ble means  toward  the  building  of  char- 
acter." The  older  educational  systems 
failed  to  recognize  this  fundamental 
truth  and  they  taught  art  as  they  did 
engineering,  from  the  purely  vocational 
standpoint.  In  great  measure  we  are  yet 
guilty  of  such  methods.  But  art  has  a 
greater  scope,  "for  in  all  its  manifesta- 
tions .  .  it  is  the  only  visible  and 
concrete  expression  of  the  mystical 
power  in  man  which  is  greater  than 
physical  force,  greater  than  physical 
mind,  whether  .  .  we  call  it  intui- 
tion or  .  .  immortal  soul."  Art  func- 
tions .as  the  "symbolic  expression  of 
otherwise  inexpressible  ideas,"  it  is  the 
splendid  realization  of  the  striving  that 
tortures  the  artist.  We  see  it  well  illus- 
trated in  the  greatest  of  artists,  Michel- 
angelo himself,  whose  conceptions  were 
snatched  from  the  peaks  of  heaven,  only 
to  leave  him  discontented  in  the  paucity 
of  their  tangible  form.  In  this  connec- 
tion we  recall  Browning's  words:  "A 
man's  reach  must  exceed  his  grasp,  or 
what  is  heaven  for?"  We  may  take  our 
lesson  from  the  latter  part  of  this  lec- 
ture; it  is  of  value  for  him  who  paints 
and  for  him  who  writes,  for  him  who 
carves  and  for  him  who  builds.  "I  find 
in  many  places  laboratories  of  art  indus- 
try where,  after  one  fashion  or  another 
— and  not  always  well  advised — is  shown 
how  to  spread  paint  on  canvas;  how  to 
pat  mud  into  some  quaint  resemblance 
to  human  or  zoological  forms;  how  to 
produce  the  voice  in  singing ;  how  to  ma- 
nipulate the  fingers  in  uneven  contest 
with  ingenious  musical  instruments ;  how 
to  assemble  lines  and  washes  on  What- 
man paper  so  that  an  alien  mason  may 
translate  them,  with  as  little  violence  as 
possible,  into  terms  of  brick  and  stone — 
or  plaster  and  papier  mache.  And  I  find 


names  and  dates  and  sequences  of  ar- 
tists taught  from  text-books,  and  sources 
and  influences  taught  from  fertile  imagi- 
nations, together  with  erudite  schemes 
and  plots  of  authorship  and  attribution; 
but  where  shall  we  find  the  philosophy, 
the  rationale  of  art,  inculcated  as  an 
elemental  portion  of  the  history  of  man 
and  of  his  civilization?  .  .  We 
build  our  little  categorical  box-stalls  and 
herd  history  in  one,  art  in  another,  re- 
ligion in  a  third,  philosophy  in  a  fourth, 
and  so  on,  until  we  have  built  a  labyrinth 
of  little  cells,  hermetically  sealed  and  se- 
curely insulated,  and  then  we  wonder 
that  our  own  civilization  is  of  the  same 
sort,  and  that  over  us  hangs  the  threat 
of  an  ultimate  bursting  forth  of  impris- 
oned and  antagonistic  forces,  with  chaos 
and  anarchy  as  the  predicted  end." 

Mr.  Cram  is  on  his  own  chosen  ground 
in  "The  Philosophy  of  the  Gothic  Res- 
toration." We  have  often  been  charmed 
by  his  Romanticism,  and  his  gauntlet  al- 
ways bears  the  challenge  when  Gothic 
art  is  mentioned.  As  a1  faithful  cham- 
pion, then,  he  plunges  into  his  theme  of 
the  Gothic  Restoration  with  a  fervor  that 
recalls  his  earlier  work  The  Gothic 
Quest.  In  the  course  of  this  paper 
two-edged  tribute  is  paid  to  Richardson : 
"The  first  great  genius  in  American 
architecture,  he  rolled  like  an  aesthetic 
Juggernaut  over  the  prostrate  bodies  of 
his  peers  and  the  public."  We  are  not  a 
little  surprised  that  the  author  found 
some  of  the  Richardsonian  influence  at 
work  in  Japan.  "Richardson  will  be  re- 
membered, not  as  the  discoverer  of  a 
new  style,  but  as  the  man  who  made 
architecture  a  living  art  once  more." 

Then  follows  a  warning  cry  to  avert 
the  ultimate  horror  of  steel.  "The  steel 
frame  is  the  enfant  terrible  of  architect- 
ure, but  like  so  many  of  the  same  genus, 
it  may  grow  up  to  be  a  serious  minded 
citizen  and  a  good  father.  It  isn't  that 
now;  it  is  a  menace,  not  only  to  archi- 
tecture, but  to  society,  but  it  is  young 
and  it  is  having  its  fling.  .  .  Like 
all  good  servants  it  makes  the  worst  pos- 
sible master;  and  when  it  enables  us  to 
reproduce  the  Baths  of  Caracalla,  vaults 
and  all,  at  half  the  price,  or  build  a  sec- 
ond Chartres  Cathedral  with  no  danger 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


189 


from  thrusting  arches,  and  with  flying 
buttresses  that  may  be  content  beauti- 
fully to  exist,  since  they  will  have  no 
other  work  to  do,  then  it  is  time  to  call  a 
halt.  The  foundation  of  architecture  is 
structural  integrity ;  and  it  does  not  mat- 
ter if  a  building  is  as  beautiful  as  the 
Pennsylvania  Station  in  New  York,  if 
its  columns  merely  hide  the  working 
steel  within,  if  its  vast  vaults  are  plaster 
on  steel  frame  and  expanded  metal,  then 
it  is  not  architecture,  it  is  scene-painting, 
and  it  takes  its  place  with  that  other 
scene-painting  of  the  late  Renaissance  to 
which  we  mistakenly  apply  the  name 
architecture."  This  and  many  other 
poignant  paragraphs  we  find  in  this  pa- 
per, full  of  truth,  and  with  a  depth  of 
significance  that  assumes  now  the  tone 
of  admonition  and  now  that  of  prophecy, 
and  the  prophecy  is  that  most  readily  to 
be  expected  of  the  author  of  St.  Thomas' 
Church  and  the  Graduate  College  at 
Princeton;  it  is  that  "now  is  the  time 
.  .  to  gather  up  once  more  the  price- 
less heritage  of  medievalism."  But  why 
of  mediaevalism,  why  not  of  something 
else?  If  we  are  working  out  our  ar- 
tistic destiny,  at  the  moment  expressing 
ourselves  in  a  number  of  styles,  how  can 
we  in  justice  to  ourselves  go  back  to  yet 
other  forms  and  warp  them  to  our 
needs?  To  be  sure  there  is  no  lack  of 
beauty  in  such  resuscitated  forms,  wit- 
ness the  Pugins  of  last  century,  and  wit- 
ness Bryn  Mawr  and  the  University  of 
Pennsylvania  and  West  Point ;  but  there 
is  on  the  other  hand  no  reason  -to  sup- 
pose -that  the  beauty  of  the  spirit  of 
Gothic  can  be  revived  in  any  greater 
degree  than  the  beauty  of  the  spirit  of 
any  other  style  that  finds  ephemeral  fa- 
vor in  the  year  1914.  It  must  be  a  beauty 
of  the  letter  only,  of  the  hard  and  tangi- 
ble form,  which  breathes  an  atmosphere 
of  a  dead  past  only  because  of  its  earlier 
association  with  that  past.  There  is  lack- 
ing what  some  philosophers  would  call 
the  reality  of  the  spirit.  But  then,  when 
men  of  Mr.  Cram's  dignity  and  authority 
have  formulated  their  theses,  we  have 
not  to  cavil,  but  simply  to  await  the  real- 
ization, be  it  a  glorification  or  a  fall.  To 
Mr.  Cram,  at  least,  Gothic  is  the  ori- 
flamme,  or  the  fiery  sign  adopted  by 


Constantine  after  the  battle  of  the  Mil- 
vian  Bridge,  and  its  legend  is:  "in  hoc 
signo  vinces." 

Other  good  papers  in  the  volume  are 
entitled  "The  Artist  and  the  World"  and 
"The  Craftsman  and  the  Architect," 
again  prompted  by  the  assured  mediaeval- 
ism  of  the  author;  but  we  hasten  on  to 
a  fine  paper  on  "American  University 
Architecture"  read  before  the  Royal  In- 
stitute of  British  Architects.  The  sub- 
ject matter  is  treated  historically, 
through  old  Harvard,  the  "Jeffersonian" 
of  the  University  of  Virginia,  Upjohn 
and  the  American  reflection  of  Pugin, 
and  the  more  modern  congeries  of  styles, 
McKim  and  the  buildings  at  Columbia, 
the  "Boulevardesque"  of  Yale  and  of 
Annapolis,  and  the  modern  Gothic — fore- 
runner of  the  great  restoration  to  come, 
if  you  choose — at  West  Point,  Prince- 
ton, Chicago,  Bryn  Mawr,  not  to  men- 
tion the  projected  designs  for  the  Vir- 
ginia Military  Institute. 

Next  we  have  a  suggestive  and  interest- 
ing discussion  of  the  differences  between 
American  and  English  planning  with 
reference  to  purpose  in  the  universities. 
Much  space  is  given  to  Princeton,  of 
which  the  author  is  the  supervising  arch- 
itect. 

Finally  comes  the  excellent  article 
which  provides  the  title  for  the  volume. 
It  is  a  parting  shot;  a  sort  of  aesthetic 
moral  to  take  with  you  to  your  study 
and  to  make  part  of  your  reflection. 
Michelet  said  that  "history  is  only  a  se- 
ries of  resurrections."  After  we  are 
through  with  The  Ministry  of  Art  we 
readily  consider  architecture  one  of  the 
greatest  of  history-makers.  In  the  course 
of  the  last  paper  we  find  this  lucid  pas- 
sage: "..art.. is  neither  a  commodity, 
nor  a  form  of  amusement,  nor  an  amen- 
ity of  life,  but  a  wonderful  attribute  of 
man  who  is  made  in  God's  image,  a  sub- 
tle language,  and  a  mystery  that,  in  its 
nature,  we  may  with  reverence  call  sac- 
ramental." 

We  shall  keep  the  book  near  us,  for  it 
affords  a  wealth  of  inspiration  for  the 
Gothicist  and  for  his  enemy,  nor  can  we 
faithfully  say,  after  reading  the  last 
page,  with  which  camp  we  desire  to 
throw  our  fortunes. 


BOOKS  RECEIVED  FROM  PUBLISHERS 

DEALING  WITH  ARCHITECTURE  AND  ALLIED  ARTS 


Design  in  Landscape  Gardening.  By  Ralph 
Rodney  Root,  assistant  professor  of  land- 
scape gardening,  University  of  Illinois, 
and  Charles  Fabiens  Kelley,  assistant 
professor  of  art,  Ohio  State  University. 
111.,  8vo,  265  p.,  index.  New  York:  The 
Century  Co.  $2. 

Early  American  Churches.  By  Aymar 
Embury  II.  111.,  large  8vo,  184  p.  Gar- 
den City,  N.  Y.:  Doubleday,  Page  &  Co. 
$2.80. 

Country  Houses.  By  Aymar  Embury  II. 
Selected  and  edited  by  Henry  H.  Saylor. 
A  collection  of  photographs  of  exteriors 
and  interiors,  with  floor  plans.  4to, 
135  p.  Garden  City,  N.  Y.:  Doubleday, 
Page  &  Co.  $3. 

Power,  Heating  and  Ventilation,  Part  II: 
Heating  and  Ventilating  Plants.  A  trea- 
tise for  designing  and  constructing  engi- 
neers, architects  and  students.  By  Charles 
L.  Hubbard,  consulting  engineer.  2d  cd 
111.,  8vo,  302  p.,  index.  New  York:  Mc- 
Graw-Hill Book  Co.  $2.50. 

The  Commercial  Problem  in  Buildings.  A 
discussion  of  the  economic  and  structural 
essentials  of  profitable  buildings,  and  the 
basis  for  valuation  of  improved  real 
estate.  By  Cecil  C.  Evers.  vice-president 
of  the  Lawyers  Mortgage  Co.  111.,  8vo, 
271  p.,  index.  New  York:  The  Record 
and  Guide  Co.  $1.50. 

Nineteenth  Annual  Report,  1914,  of  the 
American  Scenic  and  Historic  Preserva- 
tion Society  to  the  Legislature  of  the 
State  of  New  York.  Submitted  by 
George  Frederick  Kunz,  president;  Ed- 
ward Hagaman  Hall,  secretary.  8vo, 
716  p.,  and  76  plates,  index.  Assembly 
Doc.  No.  57,  Albany,  N.  Y. 

Old  Philadelphia  Colonial  Details.  Meas- 
ured and  Drawn  by  Joseph  Patterson 
Sims  and  Charles  Willing.  Large  folio. 
55  plates.  New  York:  The  Architectural 
Book  Publishing  Co.  $10  unbound,  $12 
bound. 


A  Monograph  of  the  Work  of  McKim, 
Mead  &  White,  1879-1915.  To  be  pub- 
lished in  about  twelve  parts.  Large  folio. 
Parts  I,  II  and  III,  each  with  20  plates. 
New  York:  The  Architectural  Book  Pub- 
lishing Co.  $5  a  part. 

The  Preservation  of  Structural  Timbers. 
By  Howard  F.  Weiss,  director,  Forest 
Products  Laboratory,  U.  S.  Forest  Ser- 
vice. 111..  8vo,  303  p.,  index.  New  York: 
McGraw-Hill  Book  Co.  $3. 

The  English  Parish  Church.  An  account 
of  the  chief  building  types  and  of  their 
materials  during  nine  centuries.  By 
Charles  Cox,"  LL.D.,  F.S.A.,  author  of 
"English  Church  Furniture,"  etc.  111., 
8vo,  318  p.,  index.  London:  B.  T.  Bats- 
ford.  New  York:  Charles  Scribner's 
Sons,  $3. 

A  Book  of  Architectural  and  Decorative 
Drawings  by  Bertram  Grosvenor  Good- 
hue.  Text  includes  "An  Explanation  and 
Acknowledgment"  by  E.  Donald  Robb, 
"An  Architect's  Renderings  and  Some  of 
His  Works"  by  Frank  Chouteau  Brown, 

.  and  "As  to  Types  and  the  Decoration  of 
Books"  by  H.  Ingalls  Kimball.  Large 
folio,  134  p.,  with  many  full  page  plates. 
New  York:  The  Architectural  Book  Pub- 
lishing Co.  $9. 

Universal  Safety  Standards.  A  reference 
book  of  rules,  drawings,  tables,  formulae, 
data  and  suggestions  for  the  use  of  archi- 
tects, engineers,  superintendents,  foremen, 
inspectors,  mechanics  and  students.  By 
Carl  M.  Hansen,  M.E.,  consulting  safety 
engineer,  member  American  Society  Me- 
chanical Engineers.  Compiled  under  the 
direction  of  and  approved  by  the  Work- 
men's Compensation  Service  Bureau  of 
New  York.  2d  ed.  New  York:  Universal 
Safety  Standards  Publishing  Co.  $3. 

American  Art  Annual.  Vol.  XI,  1914. 
Florence  N.  Levy,  editor.  New  York: 
American  Federation  of  Arts.  $5. 


NOTES 

AND 
COMMENTS 


Quite  recently  a  well- 
known       architect       ex- 
Sculpture   and      Pla'ined>    Presumably    by 
Architectural      wav  °J  aPol°gy  f°r  ccr- 
Design.  tain      large     SrouPs     of 

sculpture  he. had  includ- 
ed in  the  design  for  an 
important  public  build- 
ing, that  Americans  had  "gone  sculpture 
mad."  And  when  one  takes  into  considera- 
tion some  of  the  latest  results  obtained  with 
buildings  upon  which  sculpture  has  been 
employed,  it  will  be  acknowledged  that  this 
architect  was  justified  in  his  use  of  the 
word  "mad."  Two  recent  examples  in  New 
York  have  been  most  unsuccessful,  and  the 
reason  for  the  failure  is  not  hard  to  find. 
That  American  sculptors  can  work  with 
architects  to  their  mutual  advantage  and 
with  still  greater  advantage  to  the  sub- 
ject of  their  collaboration  has  often  enough 
been  demonstrated.  As  a  single  example, 
because  it  was  the  earliest,  the  buildings 
at  the  World's  Columbian  Exposition  at 
Chicago  may  be  recalled.  Never  before 
that  time  had  American  architects  been 
given  so  splendid  an  opportunity  to  do 
their  best.  Not  even  had  the  competi- 
tion for  the  Federal  Capitol  at  Washington 
in  any  sense,  actually  or  comparatively, 
put  so  many  possibilities  before  the  archi- 
tects of  the  last  years  of  the  eighteenth 
century. 

And  never  before  the  Columbian  Expo- 
sition, or  since  then,  have  American  archi- 
tects so  splendidly  taken  advantage  of  the 
opportunities  offered  in  large  public  or  pri- 
vate work,  excepting,  possibly,  that  not  a 
few  of  our  architectural  forefathers  who 
submitted  designs  in  the  Washington  com- 
petition, had,  as  shown  by  the  original 
drawings  preserved  in  the  library  of  the 
Maryland  Historical  Society,  included  most 
ambitious  but  rather  top-heavy,  not  entirely 
structural  or  constructable,  but  altogether 
amazing  groups  of  statuary  in  their  de- 
signs. Not  that  we  have  not  had  sculpture 


and  mural  decorations  enough  in  our  work, 
but  much  that  we  have  shows  that  it  was 
produced  in  an  unfortunate  and  ill-advised 
manner. 

The  buildings  at  Chicago,  designed,  as 
Henry  Van  Brunt  said,  "in  a  style  evolved 
from,  and  expressive  of  the  highest  civili- 
zations in  history,"  were  far  from  perfect, 
and  to  be  sure  they  gave  visitors  some 
wonderful  surprises.  The  Iowa  State 
Building,  for  instance,  as  an  early  French 
Renaissance  chateau  shocked  the  feelings 
of  both  European  and  the  better  informed 
American  visitors.  McKim,  Mead  & 
White's  Villa  Medici,  as  the  New  York 
State  Building,  and  many  others,  had  "just 
a  touch  of  genius,"  as  one  visitor  said, 
that  made  them  not  only  inoffensive,  but 
actually  interesting  and  inspiring.  Many 
architects  date  their  first  architectural  am- 
bition from  the  day  they  visited  the 
World's  Columbian  Exposition. 

The  one  circumstance,  aside  from  this 
"touch  of  genius,"  that  made  the  exposition 
an  architectural  success  was  the  policy  of 
co-operation  between  architects  and  sculp- 
tors, that  had  been  decided  upon  at  the 
very  start  by  Daniel  Burnham  as  architect 
in  chief  and  I.  W.  Root  as  consulting 
architect. 

Only  by  such  joint  work  in  other  cases 
can  sculpture  regain  its  place,  so  long  lost, 
as  a  means  of  architectural  decoration.  The 
modern  method  of  designing  "nice"  or 
"ideal"'  statues  without  regard  for  a  rela- 
tion to  the  architectural  background  has 
done  as  much,  on  the  one  hand,  as  the 
method  of  designing  the  statue  in  direct 
elevation  by  the  architect  and  then  hand- 
ing the  sketches  to  a  sculptor  for  execu- 
tion has  done,  on  the  other,  toward  spoil- 
ing a  large  part  of  modern  work  upon 
which  architects  and  sculptors  have  col- 
laborated. 

There  are  as  great  possibilities  before 
the  architect  now  as  there  were  before 
Greek,  Roman  or  Gothic  architects  in  the 


192 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


use  of  sculpture  in  connection  with  Ameri- 
can building,  and  we  may  well  look  for- 
ward to  splendid  things  to  be  accomplished 
when  this  proper  spirit  of  mutual  co-opera- 
tion and  sympathy  by  the  various  artists 
concerned — architects,  painters  and  sculp- 
tors, is  at  last  realized,  but  recent  work 
seems  only  to  emphasize  the  total  lack  of 
any  such  sympathy  as  well  as  a  complete 
indifference  to  the  necessary  limitations  of 
sculpture  as  the  highest  form  of  decora- 
tion in  connection  with  beautiful  buildings. 


The  present  system  of 
choosing      an      architec- 
tural  design   in   competi- 
Architectural        tion,  rather  than  holding 
Competitions.        a    competition    for    the 
purpose   of   choosing   an 
architect  to   study   the 
problem  at  hand  is  mani- 
festly a  bad  system  for  architects  as  well  as 
for  their  clients.    "The  Nature  and  Function 
of  Art,  more  Especially  of  Architecture,"  a 
book  by  the  late  Leopold  Eidlitz,  published 
in  1881,  is  seldom  read,  by  architects  of  the 
present  time.     But  it  contains  an  amount  of 
suggestion    and    practical,    helpful    criticism 
not  often  met  with  in  books  of  an  earlier  or 
later  date.     Eidlitz  felt  as  he  wrote,  and  he 
wrote    independently    and    fearlessly,    with 
full  confidence  in  his  own  convictions.     In 
spite  of  his  interest  in  the  larger  aspects  of 
ideals   and   aesthetics,   space   was   found   in 
the  book  for  a  discussion  of  competitions. 
This     is     under    the     general     heading    of 
Architecture  and  Its  Patrons. 

All  art,  he  says,  "finally  seeks  apprecia- 
tion and  a  market  with  an  audience;  but 
it  is  successful  art  only  in  the  ratio  in- 
versely proportional  to  its  dependence  upon 
immediate  popular  approval.  Architectural 
art  is  especially  unfortunate  in  this  respect: 
it  submits  to  popular  interference  while  in 
the  process  of  creation."  Against  this  in- 
terference he  vigorously  protests.  "There 
is  no  art  or  trade — there  never  was  one  out- 
side of  modern  architecture — which  is  found 
to  be  willing  to  court  popular  criticism  and 
to  abide  by  its  decision  before  its  works  are 
executed." 

An  architectural  design,  he  continues  "is 
•a  conventional  geometrical  representation 
of  an  imagined  object,  the  merits  of  which 
laymen  attempt  to  determine  by  looking  at 


this  conventional  drawing."  If  it  were  pos- 
sible to  have  juries  composed  entirely  of 
architects  this  objection  would  be  done 
away  with,  but  even  a  single  architectural 
adviser  is  lacking  in  the  great  majority  of 
competitors.  "It  is  true  the  architect  is 
supposed  to  assist  the  process  by  furnish- 
ing a  perspective  view;  but  here  the  layman 
is  more  at  sea  than  ever.  He  is  pleased 
with  the  technical  skill  and  the  artistic 
feeling  which  are  displayed  in  the  produc- 
tion of  this  picture.  He  admires  the  pic- 
ture, and  imagines  the  architecture  it  rep- 
resents to  be  good;  or  he  is  displeased,  or 
left  indifferent  by  the  picture  and  condemns 
the  architecture." 

That  the  architect,  working  as  he  does 
with  the  client's  own  material  and  upon 
his  client's  land,  must  be  willing  to  make 
clear  to  the  owner  just  what  the  results  are 
going  to  be  is  perfectly  natural,  but  it 
would  seem  that  architects  should  protest 
against  too  great  interference  by  owners  or 
committee.  Eidlitz  says,  "Hid  the  archi- 
tect the  authority  to  correct  his  client  in 
the  same  sense  in  which  it  is  conceded  to 
the  lawyer,  the  doctor,  the  shipwright,  or 
even  the  tailor  or  shoemaker,  he  would  be 
employed  by  reason  of  the  merit  of  his  fin- 
ished work,  and  would  not  be  asked  to  sub- 
mit a  design  for  approval. 

"It  is  time  he  is  granted  a  polite  hearing 
on  all  questions  relating  to  his  work,  but  is 
time  accorded  to  him  to  educate  his  clients 
to  the  degree  necessary  to  comprehend  his 
arguments?  Is  he  himself  master  of  the 
theory  of  his  art,  and  trained  to  debate 
these  questions?  Can  he,  if  personally  able 
to  do  so,  impart  to  a  client  in  a  reasonable 
series  of  conversations  what  can  be  ac- 
quired only  by  a  long  professional  educa- 
tion and  practice?" 

Quite  obviously,  as  Eidlitz  concludes,  he 
cannot  always  do  so.  In  fact,  he  argues, 
that  the  architect  in  competition  submits 
to  laymen  "a  design  of  what  he  intends  to 
do,  and  thereby  admits,  what  is  utterly 
false,  that  laymen  are  competent  to  com- 
pare a  series  of  such  designs,  and  select  the 
best,  or  that  they  can  form  a  correct  judg- 
ment of  any  one  of  them." 

Naturally,  the  conclusion  is  that  so  long 
as  this  system  is  followed  "architecture 
must  range  with  the  fashions"  and  not  with 
the  arts. 


IN   NEW  YORK     $3.^°AYEAR 


WELDED  STEEL  SASHES 


WELDED 

FOUR  TIMES  AT 

INTERSECTIONS 

MAXIMUM 

RIGIDITY 


WEATHER 

TIGHT   AT 

PIVOT 


VENTILATOR 

SECTION 

CONTINUOUS 
AT  LOWER 
CORNERS 


All  types  for  all 
types  of  Buildings. 
Write  for  Booklets 

Excepting  the  Welded  Muntin  Intersec- 
tion, weather  tightness  at  pivots,  and 
continuous  double  weathering  strip  at 
lower  corner  of  ventilator  opening,  'the 
construction  of  Welded  Steel  Sashes  is 
standard. 


THE  ZAHNER  METAL  SASH  &  DOOR  CO. 


CANTON,  OHIO 

jl gents  in  All  'Principal  Cities 


VOL.  XXXVII.     No.  3 


MARCH,  1915 


SERIAL  NO.    198 


ARCHITECTVRAL 
•    RECORD 


COVER — Detail  of  Court  of  the  Four  Seasons,  Panama-Pacific  Exposition  Page 

By  Jack  Manley  Rose  and  Grace  Norton  Rose 

THE  PANAMA^PACIFIC  EXPOSITION  AT  SAN  FRANCISCO    ,  .      193 

By  Louis  C.  Mullgardt 

FOUR  DRAWINGS  OF  THE  PANAMA^  PACIFIC  EXPOSITION     Opposite  229 

By  Jack  Manley  Rose 


THE  PANAMA-CALIFORNIA  EXPOSITION  AT  SAN  DIEGO 

By  G.  Matlack  Price 


229 


TRINITY  LUTHERAN  CHURCH,  Akron,  Ohio  :    J.  W.  C.  Gorbusier,  Architect       252 
By  L  T.  Frary 


THE  OLD  CITY  HALL,  Washington,  D.  G.     - 

By  H.  F.  Cunningham 

PORTFOLIO  OF  CURRENT  ARCHITECTURE 


268 


274 


THE  ARCHITECT'S  LIBRARY:    New  Volumes  from  University  Presses 
By  Richard  F.  Bach 

NOTES  AND  COMMENTS     -  - 


281 


287 


Editor :  MICHAEL  A.  MIKKELSEN. 

Yearly  Subscription— United  States  $3.00 
— Foreign  $4.00— Single  Copies   35  cents 


Contributing  Editor  :    HERBERT  D.  CROLY 


Advertising  Manager  :    AUSTIN  L.  BLACK 

Entered   May   22.    1902.   as  Second 
Class    Matter,  at  New  York.    N.  Y. 


Copyright    1915  by  The   Architectural 
Record  Company — All  Rights  Reserved 


PUBLISHED    MONTHLY    BY 

THE  ARCHITECTURAL  RECORD  COMPANY 


115-119  WEST  FORTIETH  STREET,  NEW  YORK 


F.   W.    DODGE,    President 


F.    T.    MILLER,    Secretary  and  Treasurer 


SIDE  AISLE  ENTRANCE  TO  PALACE  OF  VA- 
KIED  INDUSTRIES-PANAMA-PACIFIC  EXPO- 
SITION. BLISS  &  FAVILLE,  ARCHITECTS. 


THE 

ARCHITECTVKAL 
KECOFID 


MARCH,  1915 


VOLVME  XXXVII 


NVMBER  III 


PANAMA-PACIFIC 
EXPOSITION  AT 
SAN  FRANCISCO 


E3 


By  Louis   <?.  "Mullgardt 


T  INTERNATIONAL  expositions  are 
invariably  founded  on  historical 
events  of  great  importance  to  nations. 
Philadelphia's  Exposition  in  1876  cele- 
brated the  one  hundredth  anniversary  of 
the  founding  of  the  Republic.  '  Chicago's 
Exposition  in  1892  celebrated  the  four 
hundredth  anniversary  of  the  discovery 
of  America.  St.  Louis's  Exposition  in 
1904  celebrated  the  one  hundredth  anni- 
versary of  the  purchase  of  the  Louisiana 
Territory  from  Spain. 

All  of  the  foregoing  celebrations  were 
related  to  past  epochs.  San  Francisco's 
Exposition  celebrates  the  beginning  of  a 
new  epoch  following  the  advent  of  the 
greatest  engineering  accomplishment  in 
history.  It  celebrates  the  first  establish- 
ment of  a  direct  belt  connection  between 
the  Atlantic  and  Pacific  Oceans,  whereby 
a  passage  by  water,  through  the  middle 
of  the  Western  Hemisphere,  near  the  line 
of  the  Equator,  is  secured  for  all  time 


and  all  peoples.  It  celebrates  the  advent 
of  an  entirely  new  around-the-world 
route  and  a  direct  system  of  intercom- 
munication between  nations.  It  is  the 
road  which  leads  to  a  better  understand- 
ing and  makes  for  enduring  peace,  world 
progress  and  amity  between  nations. 

Fulfillment  of  San  Francisco's  laud- 
able desire  to  hold  this  international  ex- 
position was  made  possible  only  through 
a  vigorous  fight  waged  in  Washington 
for  a  period  of  six  months  or  more  with 
its  worthy  Southern  opponent,  New  Or- 
leans. It  is  fair  to  assume  that  San 
Francisco's  success  was  largely  due  to 
added  valor  acquired  through  surmount- 
ing the  desponding  trials  of  devastation 
by  fire  in  1906,  only  five  years  prior  to 
launching  the  herculean  task  of  raising 
the  sinews  necessary  for  this  interna- 
tional exposition,  amounting  to  seven- 
teen million  dollars.  This  amount  was 
subscribed  in  a  remarkably  short  time 


194 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


within  the  State  of  California  and  with- 
out the  customary  governmental  assist- 
ance accorded  previous  international  ex- 
positions. 

The  principal  feature  of  the  Philadel- 
phia Exposition  was  its  Crystal  Palace. 
Chicago  similarly  had  its  wonderful 
Court  of  Honor,  quadrangular  in  shape, 
formed  by  the  surrounding  exhibit 
palaces.  St.  Louis's  monumental  feature 
was  the  great  Cascade  surmounted  by 
Festival  Hall.  San  Francisco's  Expo- 
sition is  mainly  distinctive  in  its  general 
plan. 

Unlike  other  expositions,  the  simple 
plan  of  housing  the  department  exhibits 
has  been  accomplished  in  a  manner  that 
seems  commonplace  when  compared  with 
the  planning  of  a  residential  palace  that 
is  surrounded  with  gardens,  arborium, 
music  pavilion,  galleries,  play  yards  and 
visitors'  cottages. 

The  eight  centrally  grouped  palaces — 
Education,  Food  Products,  Agriculture, 
Liberal  Arts,  Manufacture,  Transporta- 
tion, Mines  and  Metallurgy,  and  Varied 
Industries  —  including  the  main  tower, 
the  courts  and  the  connecting  longitudi- 
nal and  lateral  avenues,  together  form 
a  homogeneous  unit  as  compact  and  cor- 
related as  are  the  various  departments 
of  a  residential  palace. 

The  east  and  west  terminations  of  this 
colossal  unit  are  flanked  by  Machinery 
Hall  and  the  Palace  of  Fine  Arts,  and 
the  secondary  lateral  axes  point  to  Fes- 
tival Hall  and  the  Palace  of  Horticulture. 

These  twelve  subdivisions  constitute 
the  principal  housed  exhibit  departments. 
The  departments  of  Foreign  Countries, 
the  States,  Aviation  and  Military  Ma- 
neuvering Fields,  the  Race  Course  and 
Live  Stock  Barns  are  beyond  the  extreme 
west  end  of  the  principal  exhibit  pal- 
aces. The  amusement  section  is  at  the 
extreme  east  end.  The  exposition  pal- 
aces form  the  central  link  which  con- 
nects all  sections  together  continuously. 

The  ideal,  fascinating  site  which  the 
exposition  occupies  has  had  the  greatest 
influence  in  the  development  of  the  gen- 
eral plan — the  great  feature  of  this  ex- 
position. 

It  is  well  worth  noting  that  the  selec- 
tion of  this  harbor  view  site  caused  the 


inhabitants  of  San  Francisco  all  the  an- 
guish that  self-constituted  factions  with- 
in an  energetic  community  could  pro- 
duce and  encounter.  Lake  Merced,  Gold- 
en Gate  Park,  Lincoln  Park,  the  Water 
Front  and  Harbor  View  each  had  en- 
thusiastic adherents  and  opponents. 

Chicago  wisely  placed  its  exposition  in 
the   undeveloped  and   uncultivated   lake 
shore  sands  of  Jackson  Park,  which  sub-  . 
sequently  became  a  great  garden  play- 
ground of  the  people. 

St.  Louis  unwisely  placed  its  exposi- 
tion in  highly  cultivated  Forest  Park, 
thereby  causing  the  destruction  of  years 
of  natural  growth  and  cultivated  park 
land,  now  and  forever  wasted.  St.  Louis 
made  the  additional  mistake  of  placing 
a  permanent  Gallery  of  Fine  Arts  in 
Forest  Park,  where  it  is  about  as  inac- 
cessible to  the  people  as  if  it  were  of 
primary  importance  to  have  it  so. 

San  Francisco  narrowly  escaped  mak- 
ing a  similar  mistake  by  destroying  its 
renowned  Golden  Gate  Park,  which  has 
taken  forty  years  to  develop  out  of  wind- 
swept sand  dunes. 

Golden  Gate  Park  was  seemingly  the 
one  glorious  spot  in  the  city  and  county 
of  San  Francisco  upon  which  the  ma- 
jority of  the  public  had  its  eye  focused 
as  the  most  suitable  of  all  sites  for  the 
exposition.  Had  it  not  been  for  the  wis- 
dom and  sagacity  exercised  by  those  who 
were  empowered  to  conduct  the  selec- 
tion of  a  site  along  safer  and  saner  chan- 
nels, San  Francisco  would  now  have  an 
exposition  where  Golden  Gate  Park  is, 
but  it  would  no  longer  have  Golden  Gate 
Park. 

The  natural  geographical  condition  of 
the  undeveloped  site  so  wisely  selected 
may  be  better  understood  by  referring 
to  the  accompanying  illustrations.  The 
major  portion  of  the  site  where  the  great 
palaces  now  stand  was  inundated  with 
salt  water  about  twenty-five  feet  in 
depth.  This  artificial  lake  was  separated 
from  the  Bay  of  San  Francisco  by  a 
substantial  sea  wall  built  of  riprap  and 
old  building  stones  discarded  from  build- 
ings destroyed  in  the  fire  of  1906.  East 
Lake  was  filled  by  means  of  pumping 
dredgers,  which  did  service  for  several 
months  pumping  silt  from  the  bay  whilst 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


195 


the  architects  and  engineers  were  en- 
gaged in  the  preparation  of  working 
drawings  and  the  landscape  engineer 
established  the  location  of  his  stock  of 
trees  and  plants  throughout  the  State 
preparatory  to  subsequent  shipment  when 
required  in  accordance  with  the  land- 
scape plans  prepared  by  the  architects. 

The  Director  of  Works  was  the  first 
official  appointed  by  the  President  of  the 
Exposition  to  provide  for  the  physical 
construction. 

In  the  fall  of  1911  the  President  of  the 
Exposition  requested  the  San  Francis- 
co Chapter  of  the  American  Institute  of 
Architects  to  submit  a  list  of  twelve 
names  chosen  from  its  ranks.  From  this 
list  the  President  of  the  Exposition 
agreed,  with  certain  reservation,  to  elect 
five  architects  to  constitute  a  council. 
About  one  month  after  the  first  Architec- 
tural Council  had  been  appointed  three  of 
its  five  members  resigned.  In  January, 
1912,  three  additional  San  Francisco  ar- 
chitects were  chosen,  this  time  without 
reference  to  the  chapter,  also  three  ar- 
chitects from  New  York  City.  Sub- 
sequently one  additional  architect  from 
Los  Angeles  was  selected ;  these  nine  ar- 
chitects constituted  the  permanent  Archi- 
tectural Commission. 

An  architectural  drafting  department 
was  immediately  established  in  the  down- 
town exposition  office  building,  where 
preliminary  planning  was  carried  on 
under  the  guidance  of  members  of  the 
Architectural  Commission  with  the  pri- 
mary object  of  developing  the  .best  gen- 
eral plan  obtainable.  Daily  conferences 
were  held  by  the  commission  for  the  pur- 
pose of  analyzing  every  conceivable 
scheme  which  might  lead  to  a  correct 
solution  of  the  general  plan.  Every  pre- 
vious exposition  plan  was  made  the  sub7 
ject  of  special  inquiry  by  the  commis- 
sion. These  daily  meetings  also  provided 
for  many  conferences  with  the  local  heads 
of  the  Government  Weather  Bureau ; 
with  the  Government  military  officials  in 
charge  of  the  Presidio  and  Fort  Mason, 
lying  to  the  west  and  east  ends,  as  to 
manner  and  extent  permissible  when  in- 
fringing upon  their  convenience ;  with 
the  landscape  gardener  as  to  maxi- 
mum possibilities  in  securing  suitable 


trees  and  plants  such  as  would  and  would 
not  withstand  the  rigors  of  the  trade 
winds;  with  the  transportation  of- 
ficials in  reference  to  establishing  prompt 
new  facilities  for  shipment  of  materials 
to  the  premises  and  rapid  passenger 
transportation  by  land  and  by  water ;  and 
finally,  with  the  State  harbor  officials 
relative  to  tides  and  currents — it  had  at 
one  time  been  considered,  wise  to  estab: 
lish  a  more  extensive  still  water  basin 
along  the  water  front  of  the  exposition 
grounds  for  smaller  craft  than  was  finally 
agreed  upon. 

The  Architectural  Commission  care- 
fully tabulated  all  available  data  on  every 
subject  affecting  the  general  plan.  Every 
conceivable  scheme  was  drawn  out  by  the 
draftsmen  and  analyzed  by  the  commis- 
sion. This  process  continued  until  the 
date  set  for  the  first  conference  of  the 
entire  Architectural  Commission,  in  Feb- 
ruary, 1912.  After  a  week's  conference 
the  present  court  plan  was  enthusiastic- 
ally adopted  by  the  Architectural  Com- 
mission. Immediately  thereafter  various 
parts  constituting  the  central  body  of  the 
exposition  plan  were  assigned  to  the  in- 
dividual members  of  the  commission  'by 
unanimous  agreement  of  its  members. 

At  the  second  meeting  of  the  Archi- 
tectural Commission,  in  August,  1912, 
preliminary  studies  were  submitted  by  all 
the  members,  each  dealing  with  the  par- 
ticular part  of  the  general  plan  assigned 
at  the  February  conference. 

In  December,  1912,  the  third  and  final 
meeting  of  the  entire  commission  took 
place  to  consider  and  adopt  the  prelim- 
inary drawings  made  on  the  basis  of  un- 
derstandings had  at  the  previous  confer- 
ences. Immediately  thereafter  the  Board 
of  Directors  of  the  Panama-Pacific  Inter- 
national Exposition  unanimously  adopted 
the  recommendations  and  designs  sub- 
mitted to  it  by  the  Architectural  Com- 
mission with  authority  to  proceed  with 
the  working  drawings.  Shortly  there- 
after a  contract  was  entered  into  for  the 
filling  and  grading  preparatory  for  the 
pile  foundations  required,  over  eighty 
per  cent,  of  the  entire  area  covered  by 
the  exposition  palaces. 

Almost  simultaneously  with  the  work- 
ing drawings  the  construction  drawings 


196 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


*\ 


«? 

fe 

$ 


'i'  V    ^ » ' 

1  t  * 

J 


••> 

>j' 


•%, 

A 

m 


PLAN  OF  EXPOSITION  GROUNDS,  SHOWING  THE  RELATION  BETWEEN  THE 


we,re  prepared.  The  timber  floor  sub- 
structures and  underfloors  were  placed 
upon  the  piles  before  the  superstruc- 
tures were  erected. 

The  chiefs  of  the  Sculpture  Depart- 
ment, Department  of  Color  and  Decora- 
tion and  Landscape  Engineering  were 
selected  by  the  Architectural  Commis- 
sion at  its  second  meeting  and  attended 
its  conferences  and  collaborated  with  it 
constantly. 

At  the  third  meeting  of  the  Architec- 
tural Commission  the  Department  of 
Travertine  Texture  was  established  The 
Architectural  Commission  thereby  cre- 
ated a  new  element  in  exposition  design- 
ing. This  element  of  texture  has  given 
an  added  interest  in  the  final  result  which 
is  invaluable  to  an  exposition  and  will 
forever  be  regarded  indispensable  in 
similar  work. 

The  filling  and  grading,  piling  and 
foundations,  sewers  and  drains,  tracks 
and  roadways,  ferry  slips  and  piers,  en- 
closures and  workshops,  exhibit  palaces 
and  courts  were  separately  contracted  for 
between  the  Division  of  Works  and  pri- 
vate contracting  concerns. 


For  the  convenience  of  the  contractors, 
also  to  facilitate  the  work  and  for  eco- 
nomic reasons,  the  Exposition  Company 
assumed  the  purchase  of  all  dimension 
lumber  and  plastic  material  direct  from 
the  forests  and  mills,  and  delivered  the 
same  on  the  grounds  to  the  contractors 
by  water  and  by  rail  at  minimum  cost. 

The  roadways  and  walks  are  built  of 
asphaltum  on  a  broken  stone  and  gravel 
foundation. 

Extensive  railroad  yards  for  the  deliv- 
ery of  building  materials  and  exhibits 
were  provided  at  the  east  end  of  the  ex- 
position grounds.  Under  Fort  Mason 
the  first  tunnel  was  constructed  express- 
ly for  the  purpose  of  establishing  direct 
railway  facilities  into  the  exposition 
grounds.  Three  parallel  lines  were  laid 
longitudinally  alongside  and  others 
through  the  palaces  so  that  railway  ship- 
ments are  made  to  the  nearest  points  of 
delivery. 

Visitors  to  the  exposition  grounds  have 
for  the  past  year  been  afforded  the  con- 
venience of  public  and  private  automo- 
bile service  over  the  main  avenues  of 
the  exposition  grounds.  Similar  service 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


197 


_ 


RIES  OF  THE  EXPOSITION  AND  THE  ADJACENT  STREETS  OF  SAN  FRANCISCO. 


will  be  established  throughout  the  expo- 
sition year.  An  intermural  system  along 
the  water  front  has  also  been  established. 
In  addition  to  this  there  will  be  wheel 
chairs,  jinrikishas  and  other  similar  small 
conveyances  to  enable  visitors  to  traverse 
every  part  of  the  grounds  and  palaces  on 
wheels. 

Ferry  slips  have  been  established  near 
the  north  end  of  Machinery  Palace.  The 
protected  bay  inlet  north  of  the  Fine  Arts 
Building  is  designed  for  smaller  pleasure 
craft.  People  residing  along  the  shores 
of  San  Francisco  Bay  may  approach  the 
exposition  direct  by  water. 

Special  electric  street  car  facilities 
have  been  established  by  the  City  of  San 
Francisco  along  the  south  line  of  the  ex- 
position grounds,  with  tributaries  leading 
from  the  west,  south  and  east  ends  of 
the  city.  The  exposition  being  situated 
centrally  on  the  north  shore  line  and  with- 
in twenty  minutes'  walk  of  the  business 
centers,  makes  it  accessible  to  the  greatest 
number  of  probable  visitors. 

Its  location  affords  voyagers  by  sea 
coming  from  the  Orient  or  from  north, 
south  or  through  the  Panama  Canal, 


a  first  view  from  aboard  ship,  after 
coming  through  the  Golden  Gate. 

A  permanent  Auditorium  has  been 
built  in  the  New  Civic  Center,  costing 
one  million  dollars.  This  money  was 
appropriated  out  of  the  five  million  dol- 
lars subscribed  by  the  City  of  San  Fran- 
cisco to  the  exposition  general  fund. 
This  Auditorium  has  a  seating  capacity 
of  twelve  thousand  and  is  complete  and 
inaugurated. 

The  artificial  lighting  of  the  exposi- 
tion is  largely  concealed.  There  will  be 
no  electric  bulbs  visible  within  the  area 
occupied  by  the  exposition  palaces.  Elec- 
tric scintillators  will  be  extensively  used. 

The  total  area  occupied  by  the  expo- 
sition consists  of  flat  land.  The  built  up 
hills  of  the  city  form  a  crescent  back- 
ground from  east  to  west,  establishing 
an  amphitheatre  facing  the  bay.  The  en- 
tire composition  is  visible  from  the  hill- 
tops and  from  the  water.  It  is  within 
easy  walking  distance  of  the  most  thickly 
populated  surrounding  hills,  which  in 
their  blue-grey  atmosphere  give  added 
luster  and  scale  to  the  colorful  composi- 
tion. 


Cfl  Cfl 


&?:- 


5        •      t     ...  f  '•  Mj 


!,«« 


^ ;j- 

»-'/>-        OS       ^P 


'' 


S' 

.  <j         jf..*     *  .  .-    3  k  \V*« 


• 


SKETCH  OF  THE  CONSTRUCTION  FOR  THE  CENTRAL  DOME 
OF  THE  PALACE  OF  FINE  ARTS,  APRIL,  1914.  DESIGNED 
BY  THE  ENGINEERING  DEPARTMENT  OF  THE  PANAMA- 
PACIFIC  EXPOSITION.  BERNARD  MAYBECK,  ARCHITECT. 


BQ 
H 

O* 

ia 


^  J 
o  w 


>> 

W  — 

^Q 
J  w 

&H« 

O  CM 

«  < 
y  « 
<  o 


THE  PERISTYLE  TO  THE  LEFT  OF  THE  CENTRAL 
DOME  OF  THE  PALACE  OF  FINE  ARTS.  BERNARD 
MAYBECK,  ARCHITECT.  PHOTOGRAPHED  AT 
NIGHT  BY  FRANCIS  BRUGUIERE.  DECEMBER,  1914. 


SKETCH  OF  THE  WEST  END  AND  TYPICAL 
DOME  OF  THE  PALACE  OF  EDUCATION,  FEB- 
RUARY, 1914,  BEFORE  SCAFFOLDING  WAS 
REMOVED.  BLISS  &  FAVILLE,  ARCHITECTS. 


SKETCH  OF  TYPICAL  CORNER  PAVILION  AND  PERIMETER 
WALLS  OF  THE  PALACE  OF  EDUCATION,  MARCH  1914, 
BEFORE  SCAFFOLDING  WAS  REMOVED.  THE  MINI- 
MUM HEIGHT  OF  ALL  EXPOSITION  WALLS  IS  SIXTY-FIVE 
FEET.  BLISS  &  FAVILLE,  ARCHITECTS. 


THE  COURT  OF  PALMS,  GEORGE  W.  KELHAM.  AR- 
CHITECT, WITH  THE  PALACE  OF  HORTICULTURE  TO 
THE  SOUTH,  BAKEWELL  &  BROWN,  ARCHITECTS. 


SKETCH  OF  PRELIMINARY  CONSTRUCTION  AROUND  THE 
COURT  OF  PALMS,  MARCH,  1914.  DESIGNED  BY  THE 
ENGINEERING  DEPARTMENT  OF  THE  PANAMA- PACIFIC 
EXPOSITION.  GEORGE  W.  KELHAM,  ARCHITECT. 


Pk  O 

to  W 


«82£§° 

s«S£*l 


9M*  ™t      »'*  *» 


rt    Vfll 

f*  ill  n  *% 


^  . 
ties/*  of-  tie  far. 


SKETCH  SHOWING  CONSTRUCTION  IN  THE  NORTHWEST  CORNER 
OF  THE  COURT  OF  FOUR  SEASONS,  FEBRUARY,  1914.  DESIGNED  BY 
THE  ENGINEERING  DEPARTMENT  OF  THE  PANAMA- PACIFIC  EXPO- 
SITION. HENRY  BACON,  ARCHITECT.  DOME  OF  THE  PALACE  OF  FOOD 
PRODUCTS  IN  THE  DISTANCE.  BLISS  &  FAVILLE,  ARCHITECTS. 


SKETCH   OF  TYPICAL  INTERIOR  CONSTRUCTION   OF 
THE    EIGHT    DOMES    AS    DESIGNED    BY™E    ENGI- 
NEERING   DEPARTMENT    OF    THE    PANAMA-PACI 
EXPOSITION.  BLISS     &     FAVILLE,     ARCHITI 


ll  I 

W    hJ    "    Lj 


c/) 


Sli 


w  R  2  w  «« 

c«  W  H  §  t_ 
«  W  Qb 
w  ;z;«  Q  « 

>3^  w£ 

sBffi  a 


n  v 

5w 

H      B 


j,  W  g 

«  3  fc 


fc.  p  O  O    . 

o  5  o  ^  « 

U       H  W 

u§    wS 

«  W  >^K  w 
<  H  «  H  O 


NIGHT  SCENE  SHOWING  SOUTHEAST  CORNER  PAVILION  IN 
COURT  OF  THE  UNIVERSE,  AS  SEEN  BETWEEN  THE  SCAF- 
FOLDING OF  THE  GREAT  ARCH  OF  THE  TOWER  OF  JEWELS. 
PHOTOGRAPHED  DECEMBER,  1914,  BY  FRANCIS  BRU- 
GUIERE.  McKIM,  MEAD  &  WHITE,  ARCHITECTS. 


SKETCH  OF  CENTRAL  SOUTH  ENTRANCE  TO 
PALACE  OF  VARIED  INDUSTRIES,  MARCH. 
1914.  BLISS  &  FAVILLE,  ARCHITECTS. 


SKETCH  OF  EAST  ENTRANCE  TO  PALACE  OF 
VARIED  INDUSTRIES  ON  A  RAINY  DAY, 
MARCH,  1914.  BLISS  &  FAVILLE,  ARCHITECTS. 


SKETCH  SHOWING  FRAMEWORK  OF  NORTH  AVENUE  OF 
THE  COURT  OF  ABUNDANCE.  DESIGNED  BY  THE  ENGI- 
NEERING DEPARTMENT  OF  THE  PAN  AM  A -PACIFIC  EX- 
POSITION. LOUIS  CHRISTIAN  MULLGARDT,  ARCHITECT. 


SOUTHWEST  VIEW  OF  CHIMES  TOWER 
OF  THE  COURT  OF  ABUNDANCE. 
LOUIS  CHRISTIAN  MULLGARDT,  ARCHITECT. 


W  H 
O  U 
2  W 


• 


o  J 
u  & 

rs 

M 


31 

U  « 


53 


SKETCH  SHOWING  INTERIOR  CONSTRUCTION  OF  PAL- 
ACE OF  MACHINERY,  FEBRUARY,  1914.  DESIGNED  BY 
THE  ENGINEERING  DEPARTMENT  OF  THE  PANAMA  - 
PACIFIC  EXPOSITION.  WARD  &  BLOHM,  ARCHITECTS. 


CENTRAL  PORTION  OF  THE  WEST 
FACADE  OF  THE  PALACE  OF  MACHIN- 
ERY. WARD  &  BLOHM,  ARCHITECTS. 


o         w 


W  ^  ta  W 

W       O  W 

oo  _•     <; 


H  O 


o  ro  *  < 


I    o  U 


W  £  « 

P  PQ  fc, 


A  CORNER  PAVILION  IN  THE  COURT  OF  THE 
UNIVERSE  —  PANAMA- PACIFIC  EXPOSITION. 
McKIM,  MEAD  &  WHITE,  ARCHITECTS. 


» 


FOVR  DRAWINGS 

OF    THE 

PANAMA-PACIFIC 

INTERNATIONAL 

EXPOSITION 


JACK    MANLEY    RJDSE 


B 


* 


TRINITY  LVTHERAN  CHVRCH 

AKRON,    OHIO 

J  WC  CORBVSIER,  ARCHITECT 

fo 

By  I  T  Frory  [ggg 


THE  congregation  of  the  Trinity  Lu- 
theran Church  of  Akron,  Ohio,  a 
congregation  of  moderate  size, 
found  itself  under  the  necessity  of  pro- 
viding a  new  place  of  worship ;  and  hav- 
ing decided,  by  means  of  a  competition, 
upon  an  architect  whose  ideas  seemed  in 
accord  with  its  own,  gave  him  a  free  hand 
to  develop  an  edifice  suited  to'  its  needs 
and  to  the  requirements  of  the  ritual  of 
the  Lutheran  Church. 

The  architect  chosen  was  Mr.  J.  W.  C. 
Corbusier,  then  of  the  firm  of  Page  and 
Corbusier,  but  now  practicing  alone. 
Mr.  Corbusier  received  his  architectural 
training  in  the  ateliers  of  Paris  and  the 
offices  of  New  York,  yet  he  was  never 
mastered  by  the  spirit  of  Classicism  with 
which  he  was  surrounded;  instead  there 
gripped  him  an  almost  religious  zeal  for 
the  traditions  of  the  Gothic  period.  The 
bulk  of  his  professional  work,  however, 
has  been,  as  it  were  by  the  irony  of  fate, 
carried  out  along  Classic  lines,  a  fact  that 
has  served  to  intensify  the  ardor  with 
which  he  has  undertaken  ecclesiastical 
commissions. 

In  the  case  of  the  Trinity  Lutheran 
Church,  he  saw  an  opportunity  to  demon- 
strate the  feasibility  of  building  a  small 
church  edifice  adapted  to  present-day  re- 
quirements, but  possessing  the  dignity  and 
churchly  feeling  peculiar  to  the  great 
Gothic  structures  of  the  past.  With  this 
idea  in  mind  he  personally  designed  and 
superintended  the  entire  structure. 

As  the  plans  grew,  the  appreciation  of 
the  people  grew  also  and  the  finished 
structure  embodies  a  completeness  of 
equipment  far  beyond  the  original  plans. 
This  increase  did  not  mean  the  addition 
of  unnecessary  enrichment  and  useless 
accessories.  It  simply  meant  raising  the 
standard  of  quality  in  materials  and 


workmanship  and  the  introduction  of 
features  whose  omission  would  probably 
mean  expensive  alterations  later.  The 
only  point  on  which  a  captious  critic 
might  find  fault  would  be  with  the  use 
of  artificial  instead  of  cut  stone.  This 
question  was  not  decided,  however,  until 
after  thorough  tests  had  been  made  of 
the  materials,  which  demonstrated  that 
,  the  artificial  was  harder  and  more  im- 
pervious to  moisture  than  the  natural 
product.  The  consequent  saving  in  cost 
made  possible  the  use  of  tracery  and  or- 
namental detail  to  an  extent  which  would 
otherwise  have  been  out  of  the  question. 
An  excellent  modeller,  working  in  ac- 
cord with  and  under  the  constant  super- 
vision of  the  architect,  succeeded  in  pro- 
ducing a  sympathetic  quality  in  the  de- 
tail which  one  expects  to  find  only  in 
structures  which  have  been  mellowed  by 
time.  The  intangible  refinements  found 
in  the  old  work  have  been  studied  so 
carefully  and  the  more  evident  factors 
of  proportion  and  massing  have  been 
handled  so  skillfully  that,  despite  its  ac- 
tual newness  and  smallness,  the  church 
possesses  to  an  unusual  degree  the  air 
of  dignity,  repose  and  age  which  con- 
stitute the  charm  of  the  Gothic  cathe- 
drals. 

The  front  conveys  a  satisfying  im- 
pression of  massiveness  and  delicacy. 
The  great  buttresses  which  flank  the 
doorway  melt  upward  into  twin  towers 
and  produce  a  fine  sense  of  unity  and 
stability.  The  severity  of  their  dark 
brickwork  is  softened  by  contrast  with 
the  light  stone  trimmings  and  they  frame 
in,  like  a  picture,  the  grouping  of  portal 
and  windows  for  whose  delicate  lace-like 
detail  they  form  an  excellent  foil.  Crown- 
ing all  and  pulling  the  composition  to- 
gether, the  rich,  light  detail  of  turrets 


254 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


REAR  VIEW-TRINITY   LUTHERAN  CHl'RCH,  AKRON,  OHIO. 
J.    W.   C.   Corbusier,   Architect. 


and  gable  lends  an  air  of  exquisite  deli- 
cacy to  the  whole. 

The  brick  used  is  dark  and  irregular 
in  color,  rough  in  texture,  and  has  much 
the  effect  of  that  found  in  the  fifteenth 
century  houses  of  England.  The  stone- 
work has  the  warm  grey  tone  of  Bedford 
limestone. 

The  ground  upon  which  the  building 
stands  slopes  downward  from  the  front. 
At  the  extreme  back  an  archway  on  the 
lower  level  gives  access  to  an  open  clois- 
ter leading  to  the  Sunday  School  wing, 
which  forms  an  L  with  the  main  block 
and  walls  in  the  back  of  the  level  lot, 
which  may  at  some  future  time  become 
a  cloister  garth,  but  which  at  present  is 
occupied  by  an  old  residence  utilized  as 
the  parsonage. 

Passing  through  the  front  doorway, 
whose  detail  merits  study,  one  enters  the 
narthex,  which  is  enclosed  by  a  rich  oak 
screen  of  open  glazed  tracery  and  car- 
ries above  it  a  gallery.  At  the  right  a 
portion  of  this  space  is  partitioned  off 
for  a  processional  room,  which  is  con- 
nected by  a  winding  stairway  with  the 


robing  room  in  the  basement.  In  the 
processional  room  is  a  small  organ  and 
up  in  the  tower,  well  above  the  gallery 
level,  the  echo  organ  speaks  through  a 
lancet  opening  in  the  front  wall.  The 
narthex,  with  its  low,  dark  beamed  ceil- 
ing, emphasizes  the  lightness  of  the  soar- 
ing, clustered  columns  and  the  vaulted 
ceiling  of  the  nave.  This  contrast  pro- 
duces a  startling  effect  of  height  and 
spaciousness,  which  is  enhanced  by  the 
rich  light  from  the  truly  remarkable 
glass  which  is  rapidly  taking  the  place 
of  temporary  glazing.  Shallow  tran- 
septs also  tend  to  increase  the  effect  of 
spaciousness. 

The  transepts  are  occupied  by  galleries, 
open  below,  but  otherwise  having  prac- 
tically the  same  detail  as  the  one  above 
the  narthex.  The  warm  dark  color  of 
the  oak  woodwork  gives  a  pleasing  con- 
trast to  the  grey  of  walls  and  masonry, 
while  a  restrained  use  of  gold  and  color 
adds  a  desirable  accent.  Tracery  is  much 
in  evidence  throughout  the  woodwork, 
but  otherwise  carving  has  been  used 
sparingly,  chiefly  in  the  form  of  symbolic 


TRINITY  LUTHERAN  CHURCH. 
AKRON,  OHIO.  J.  W.  C. 
CORBUSIER,  ARCHITECT. 


SIDE    VIEW— TRINITY    LUTHERAN 
CHURCH,       AKRON,       OHIO.  J. 

W.     C.     CORBUSIER,     ARCHITECT. 


10 


NARTHEX  SIDE  ENTRANCE— TRINITY 
LUTHERAN  CHURCH,  AKRON,  OHIO. 
J.  W.  C.  CORBUSIER,  ARCHITECT. 


258 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


LOOKING  TOWARD  SUNDAY  SCHOOL  ENTRANCE-TRINITY  LUTHERAN  CHURCH,  AKRON.  OHIO. 

J.   W.   C.   Corbusier,  Architect. 


emblems,  which  are  everywhere  to  be 
seen  in  woodwork,  glass  and  masonry. 
The  pulpit  has  nine  shields  bearing  gold 
symbols  of  the  Passion  of  the  Saviour. 
Luther's  crest  appears  in  color  and  gold 
upon  shields  which  enrich  the  gallery 
fronts.  The  chancel  is  lighted  by  seven 
lancet  windows,  symbolizing  the  seven 
original  churches ;  the  three  center  ones 
contain  representations  of  the  Nativity, 
the  Passion  and  the  Ascension  ;  the  other 
fpur  are  of  a  purely  geometrical  charac- 
ter. The  large  windows  of  the  clerestory 
a^re  divided  into  three  sections,  symboliz- 
ing the  Trinity. 

The  great  aim  in  view  in  designing 
the  glass  was  to  produce  the  rich  tone 
found  in  the  thirteenth  century  glass  of 
the  old  cathedrals.  It  was  also  definitely 
determined  that  there  should  be  no  large 
figures  or  other  features  which  would 
by  their  size  dwarf  the  whole  or  make 
unduly  prominent  any  portion  of  it; 
neither  should  any  masses  of  color  be 
permitted  to  dominate  the  scheme.  This 
did  not  mean  the  elimination  of  pattern 
or  the  use  of  a  mere  kaleidoscopic  mass- 


ing of  bits  of  colored  glass,  but  the  care- 
ful building  up  of  well  studied  pattern, 
with  such  restraint  that,  though  filled  with 
pictured  symbolism,  it  would  at  -first 
sight  suggest  only  a  rich  glow  of  jeweled 
light.  The  completed  windows  show  a 
remarkable  fidelity  to  the  spirit  of  the 
original  studies.  There  are  figures  and 
emblems  innumerable,  all  forming  com- 
ponent parts  of  a  well-studied  and  evi- 
dent plan  of  ornament.  Medallions  give 
a  needed  accent  to  the  scroll  work  and 
other  ornament;  the  tiny  figures  which 
have  been  used  unstintedly  show  great 
fidelity  in  drawing;  in  fact,  painstaking 
skill  is  evident  in  every  detail.  Yet  in 
striving  for  these  minute  perfections,  the 
greater  thing,  the  true  function  of  the 
window,  has  not  been  forgotten ;  and 
when  one  steps  back  to  get  the  general 
effect,  the  little  details  are  forgotten  and 
one  is  conscious  only  of  a  great  glow  of 
scintillating  color,  filled  with  the  sparkle 
and  fire  of  jewels. 

The  altar  and  reredos  of  artificial  Caen 
stone,  with  their  light  color  and  delicacy 
of  detail,  give  a  pleasing  relief  to  the 


SUNDAY  SCHOOL  ENTRANCE-TRINITY 
LUTHERAN  CHURCH,  AKRON,  OHIO. 
J.  W.  C.  CORBUSIER,  ARCHITECT. 


260 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


\ 


DETAIL  OF  TRANSEPT-TRINITY  LU- 
THERAN CHURCH,  AKRON,  OHIO, 
J.  W.  C.  CORBUSIER,  ARCHITECT. 


262 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


VIEW  TOWARD  CHANCEL-TRINITY  LUTHERAN  CHURCH,  AKRON,  OHIO. 
J.  W.  C.  Corbusier,  Architect. 


sombreness  of  the  chancel,  whose  plain 
oak  wainscot  rises  to  the  gallery  level. 
Five  figures  are  being  carved  for  the 
niches  in  the  reredos,  the  middle  one 
being  the  figure  of  the  Saviour,  the  other 
four  representing  the  four  Evangelists. 
The  technical  inspiration  for  these  fig- 
ures is  to  be  drawn  from  the  best  work 
of  the  Middle  Ages,  and  when  completed 
they  are  to  be  enriched  with  gold  and 
color,  and  antiqued. 

The  divided  organ  is  placed  on  either 
side  of  the  chancel,  lancet  openings  from 
both  chancel  and  transepts  being  filled 
with  plain  pipes,  no  provision  having  as 
yet  been  made  for  a  decorative  organ 
front. 

T.he  metal  work  throughout  the  church 
deserves  especial  mention.  Lighting  fix- 
tures, locks,  hinges,  in  fact  all  exposed 
metal  work,  were  designed  by  the  archi- 
tect; and  here  again  is  illustrated  the 
fidelity  with  which  the  spirit  of  the 
Gothic  style  has  been  preserved.  The 
iron  shows  the  handiwork  of  the  smith, 


not  the  founder  nor  the  machinist,  for  a 
glance  makes  evident  the  fact  that  this 
work  was  hammered  out  on  the  anvil  and 
not  cast  in  a  foundry  or  cut  on  a  ma- 
chine. As  a  relief  from  the  possible 
monotony  of  the  dark  metal,  bits  of  gold 
enrichment  have  been  introduced  here 
and  there,  but  so  toned  down  in  color  as 
to  appear  but  a  touch  of  accent  and  not 
a  jarring  spot  of  brightness. 

An  inspection  of  the  accompany- 
ing plans  will  show  a  well  studied  ar- 
rangement of  accommodation  for  the 
various  branches  of  parish  activity.  As 
yet  but  little  provision  has  been  made  for 
''institutional  work,"  but  sufficient 
ground  space  is  available  for  future  ex- 
tension along  this  line. 

In  the  basement,  beneath  the  church 
proper,  is  the  large  social  room,  which 
will  be  utilized  for  entertainments,  sup- 
pers and  various  social  gatherings.  This 
has  an  exceptionally  high  ceiling  for  a 
basement  room,  is  unobstructed  by  piers 
or  columns  and  as  it  has  a  seating  capac- 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


263 


NARTHEX   SCREEN— TRINITY   LUTHERAN   CHURCH,   AKRON,    OHIO. 
J.   W.   C.   Corbusier.   Architect. 


NARTHEX-TRINITY  LUTHERAN  CHURCH,  AKRON,  OHIO. 
J.   W.   C.   Corbusier,  Architect. 


264 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


265 


Urn 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


267 


ity  nearly  equal  to  that  of  the  church 
above,  it  renders  unnecessary  the  use  of 
the  latter  for  any  except  devotional  pur- 
poses. An  elevated  platform  makes  am- 
ple provision  for  concerts  and  other  en- 
tertainments and  is  adjoined  by  two 
dressing  rooms,  in  connection  with  which 
the  choir  robing 
room  can  be  pressed 
into  service  when 
necessary.  The  space 
beneath  the  plat- 
form is  enclosed  by 
doors,  behind  which 
are  stored  the  fold- 
ing banquet  tables 
and  surplus  chairs. 
These  rest  upon  light 
trucks,  by  means  of 
which  they  may  be 
readily  wheeled  to 
any  part  of  the  room. 

The  adjoining 
kitchen  and  pantry 
are  exceptionally 
well  ventilated  and 
lighted  because  of 
the  high  ceilings  and 
the  large  windows 
which  open  into 
areaways.  Service  to 
the  dining  room  is 
simplified  by  sliding 
panels  in  the  parti- 
tion, through  which 
the  dishes  are  passed 
across  a  counter  to 
the  waiters. 

As  the  rooms  de- 
voted to  the  various 
societies  open  from 
the  social  room,  all 
the  business  and 
social  life  is  cen- 
tered in  this  part  of  the  building,  access 
to  which  is  gained  from  the  cloister  in 
the  rear. 

The  wing  occupied  by  the  Sunday 
School  is  entered  from  two  levels,  the 
main  room  from  the  front,  the  primary 
room  from  the  lower  level  of  the  cloister. 


SOUTH    SIDE   AISLE— TRINITY   LUTHERAN 
CHURCH,"  AKRON,  OHIO. 


Thus,  although  the  primary  department 
is  on  the  floor  below  the  main  room,  the 
slope  of  the  lot  makes  it  possible  for 
both  to  have  entrances  on  the  ground 
level  and  to  have  outside  light.  No  at- 
tempt has  been  made  in  this  wing  to  pro- 
duce architectural  effect ;  but,  instead, 
comfort  and  con- 
venience have,  been 
sought  after.  The 
main  room  has  a 
balcony,  which  is 
divided  into  class 
rooms,  as  is  also  the 
space  beneath.  These 
rooms  are  so  ar- 
ranged in  plan  as  to 
focus  on  the  center 
of  the  rostrum,  thus 
affording  an  unob- 
structed view  of  the 
speaker  from  every 
seat  in  the  room. 

It  will  be  seen  that 
all  the  various  de- 
partments of  church 
activity  are  ade- 
quately provided  for 
and  in  such  a  way 
as  to  insure  privacy 
for  each.  Thus,  the 
devotional  services 
of  the  church  prop- 
er, the  social  and 
business  functions 
of  the  different  so- 
cieties, and  the  edu- 
cational work  of  the 
Sunday  School  may 
all  be  carried  on  si- 
multaneously with- 
out interfering  with 
one  another,  and  yet 
all  are  so  housed  as 
to  have  convenient  inter-communication. 
Taken  as  a  whole,  Trinity  Lutheran 
Church  is  an  interesting  example  of  the 
progress  that  is  being  made  and  the  in- 
terest that  is  being  taken  in  developing 
higher  ideals  in  ecclesiastical  architec- 
ture. 


THE  OLD   CITY  HALL,  WASHINGTON,  D.   C. 


OLD    CITY    HALL 
WASHINGTON,  D.C. 


By  H.  F.  Cunningham^ 


ABOUT  the  middle  of  the  year  1795 
President  Washington  and  Dr. 
Thornton,  author  of  the  accepted 
design  for  the  Capitol  Building,  became 
dissatisfied  with  the  Frenchman,  Hallet, 
who  had  been  employed  as  superintend- 
ent of  construction,  and  cast  about  for 
some  one  to  take  his  place.  John  Trum- 
bull,  the  artist,  was  then  in  London  and, 
hearing  of  the  vacancy,  wrote  Thornton, 
urging  the  appointment  of  George  Had- 
ifield,  a  young  British  architect  who  had 
"cut  quite  a  caper"  at  the  Royal  British 
Academy  of  Art  about  that  time,  having 
won  all  the  prizes  at  the  Academy  for 
excellence  of  architecture.  Benjamin 
West,  President  of  the  Royal  Academy, 
strongly  recommended  Hadfield,  express- 
ing himself  as  convinced  that  he  pos- 
sessed a  more  thorough  knowledge  of 
civil  architecture  than  any  other  young 
man  in  England. 

Hadfield  was  accordingly  appointed  to 
the  vacancy  on  October  15,  1795,  his  sal- 
ary to  be  $1,400  per  annum,  plus  his 
traveling  expenses  to  America.  The 
Capitol  Building  was  then  scarcely  start- 
ed, Hallet  having  done  nothing  but  some 
excavating  and  a  few  foundations,  most 


of  which  were  later  removed  as  unneces- 
sary. 

Shortly  after  taking  up  his  work  Had- 
field thought  it  advisable  to  suggest  cer- 
tain changes  in  the  design  of  the  building, 
among  other  things  recommending  the 
addition  of  an  attic  story  to  the  design  as 
accepted.  The  Commissioners  in  charge 
of  the  work  had,  however,  become  dis- 
satisfied with  Hallet  by  reason  of  his 
wanting  to  make  changes  in  the  design 
and  were  not  open  to  suggestions.  Learn- 
ing of  their  rejection  of  his  recommenda- 
tions, Hadfield  promptly  gave  the  three 
months'  notice  required  by  his  contract 
and  was  ready  to  quit;  but  finding  the 
Commissioners  willing  to  accept  his  resig- 
nation, he  withdrew  it  and  was  continued 
on  the  work,  with  the  express  stipulation 
that  he  was  "engaged  to  superintend  the 
execution  of  the  plan  without  altera- 
tion." 

Things  seem  to  have  gone  right 
smoothly  with  him  for  a  time,  until  1798, 
when,  on  May  10,  he  was  notified  that  his 
resignation  would  be  acceptable,  to  take 
effect  three  months  from  that  date,  but 
without  waiting  for  the  three  months  to 
elapse,  he  resigned  forthwith.  The  trou- 


270 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


VIEW  ACROSS  FORECOURT— THE  OLD  CITY  HALL,  WASHINGTON,  D.  C 


ble  this  time  was  that  he  refused  to  sur- 
render his  drawings  for  the  Federal  Ex- 
ecutive Offices,  then  building  (demol- 
ished many  years  ago  to  make  room  for 
the  Treasury  and  State,  War  and  Navy 
Department  Buildings).  James  Hoban, 
architect  of  the  President's  House,  was 
then  engaged  to  succeed  Hadfield  on  the 
Capitol  work,  and  was  paid  Hadfield's 
salary  in  addition  to  the  $1,400  a  year  he 
already  received  for  his  work  on  the 
President's  House. 

Hadfield  then  engaged  in  private  prac- 
tice in  the  new  city  and  remained  there 
until  his  death,  in  1826.  He  designed  in 
the  course  of  his  practice  several  public 
and  private  buildings  that  we  can  posi- 
tively attribute  to  him  and  possibly  sev- 
eral others  whose  authorship  is  not  so 
definitely  known.  Among  the  buildings 
of  which  we  are  certain  he  was  the  au- 
thor are  the  Federal  Offices  above  re- 
ferred to,  the  Mausoleum  for  the  Van 
Ness  family,  still  standing  in  Oak  Hill 
Cemetery  in  Georgetown,  and  the  City 
Hall,  now  occupied  by  the  United  States 
Courts  of  the  District  of  Columbia,  and 
illustrated  herewith.  The  Van  Ness 
Tomb  is  a  gem  of  refinement  and  pro- 


portion, and  it  is  difficult  to  imagine  a 
more  satisfactory  solution  of  the  prob- 
lem. There  is  a  very  beautiful  urn  at 
the  top  of  it  and  all  the  details  are  most 
delicate  and  pleasing.  Like  Palladio, 
Hadfield  was  compelled  to  work  in  the 
cheapest  and  most  easily  gotten  mate- 
rials ;  and  this  lovely  tomb,  like  the  Court 
House,  is  sadly  in  need  of  repair. 

I  think  we  should  not  be  far  wrong  in 
attributing  the  group  of  buildings  built  on 
Analostan  Island  for  the  Mason  family 
to  Hadfield,  as  well  as  several  other  pri- 
vate houses  in  the  city  which  are  still 
standing  and  occupied.  Certainly  no  one 
else,  unless  it  were  Dr.  Thornton,  could 
have  produced  anything  so  well  propor- 
tioned and  so  exquisitely  detailed  as  the 
Mason  house,  and  all  Dr.  Thornton's 
works  are  pretty  definitely  known. 

The  City  Hall  was  begun  in  1820,  the 
first  part  built  being  the  central  part  with 
its  Greek  Ionic  portico.  The  east  wing 
was  finished  in  1826,  the  year  of  its  au- 
thor's death,  and  the  west  wing  not  until 
1849.  During  this,  rather  long  period  of 
construction  the  building  was,  according 
to  an  early  writer,  "a  veritable  ruin." 

In  1871  the  building  was  made  over  to 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


271 


the  Federal  Government  and  has  since 
that  time  housed  the  District  Courts. 
The  offices  of  the  U.  S.  District  Attor- 
ney, the  U.  S.  Marshal,  the  Register 
of  Wills  and  Recorder  of  Deeds  are  also 
quartered  in  it.  The  District  Jail  was 
formerly  located  directly  behind  the  City 
Hall,  and  there  were  in  connection  with 
it  a  number  of  underground  cells,  which 
are  said  to  have  been  quite  undesirable 
places  in  which  to  spend  one's  days.  The 
building  has  been  the  scene  of  a  number 
of  famous  trials,  among  them  that  of 
Guiteau,  the  murderer  of  President  Gar- 
field. 

The  City  Hall,  or  Court  House,  as  it 
is  now  always  called,  furnishes  a  notable 
example  of  the  possibility  of  achieving 
a  perfectly  satisfactory  building  without 
the  use  of  any  ornament  whatever.  The 
architect  relied  entirely  upon  proportion 
and  correct  detail  in  this  case,  as  he  did 
in  all  the  examples  of  his  work  that  we 
know,  and  the  result  is  most  admirable. 
The  interiors  are  almost  barn-like  in  their 
absolute  simplicity,  and  this  is  a  source 
of  much  criticism  on  the  part  of  its  pres- 
ent occupants.  Those  who  have  to  use 


the  building  are  endeavoring  to  have 
Congress  provide  what  they  consider 
more  suitable  quarters,  and  several 
schemes  have  been  brought  forward, 
among  them  the  refacing  of  the  building 
with  limestone  or  the  replacing  of  it 
with  a  wholly  new  structure.  In  either 
event  the  city  would  lose  a  most  notable 
example  of  early  American  architecture. 
The  building  is  of  brick,  stuccoed,  with 
the  architectural  members,  columns  and 
the  like  of  sandstone,  the  whole  being 
painted  white.  The  situation  is  most 
agreeable,  the  building  being  set  in  a 
large  park,  with  an  adequate  approach 
and  a  sufficient  clear  space  all  around. 

There  has  been  so  little  money  appro- 
priated for  its  maintenance  for  some  time 
past  that  certain  parts,  especially  on  the 
exterior,  are  badly  in  need  of  repair,  some 
of  the  stone  members  having  disinte- 
grated through  lack  of  paint,  and  the 
stucco  having  peeled  off  in  many  places. 
The  entire  restoration  of  the  building  is, 
however,  quite  possible  and  should  not 
prove  very  expensive ;  and  it  is  to  be 
hoped  that  there  will  be  found  a  willing- 
ness on  the  part  of  those  in  authority  to 


SOUTH    ELEVATION   OF   WEST   WING.    SHOWING   ANNEX   IN   BACKGROUND- THE   OLD 
CITY  HALL,  WASHINGTON,  D.  C. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


273 


WEST  ELEVATION  OF  WEST  WING-THE  OLD  CITY  HALL,  WASHINGTON,  D.  C. 


appropriate  without  further  delay  suffi- 
cient funds  to  undertake  it. 

There  are  some  interesting  comments 
on  Mr.  Hadfield  to  be  found  in  the  cor- 
respondence of  his  contemporaries,  a  few 
of  which  follow : 

The  Commissioners  in  charge  of  the 
building  of  the  new  city  write,  in  1797, 
that  "Hadfield  has  drawn  the  plan  of  all 
the  public  offices  to  be  erected  in  the  City 
of  Washington,  and  which  have  met  with 
the  approbation  of  the  President  and  the 
several  Departments  for  which  they  are 
intended ;"  and  again  in  1798,  after  he 
had  resigned,  "We  believe  Mr.  Hadfield 
to  be  a  young  man  of  taste  but  we  have 
found  him  extremely  deficient  in  prac- 
tical knowledge  as  an  architect." 

This  latter  criticism  would  seem  to  be 
rather  disproved  by  such  of  his  work  as 
we  know  today,  as  well  as  by  the  follow- 
ing extract  from  a  letter  written  by  the 
artist  Trumbull  after  Hadfield's  death: 
"His  services  were  soon  dispensed  with, 

11 


not  because  his  knowledge  was  not  emi- 
nent, but  because  his  integrity  compelled 
him  to  say  that  parts  of  the  original  plan 
could  not  be  executed.  Poor  Hadfield 
languished  many  years  in  obscurity  in 
Washington,  where,  however,  toward  the 
close  of  his  life,  he  had  the  opportunity 
of  erecting  a  noble  monument  to  himself 
in  the  City  Hall,  a  beautiful  building  in 
which  is  no  waste  of  space  or  materials." 

Latrobe,  the  famous  architect,  later 
connected  with  the  Capitol  work,  wrote 
to  Hadfield  urging  him  to. prove  his  au- 
thorship of  certain  parts  of  the  design 
for  the  Capitol  and  thus  lighten  "the  load 
of  calumny  with  which  you  have  been 
treated,"  but  Hadfield  never  laid  claim 
to  any  portion  of  the  design  as  his  own. 

In  concluding  the  foregoing  brief 
sketch,  the  present  writer  wishes  to  ex- 
press his  indebtedness  to  the  very  inter- 
esting "History  of  the  Capitol"  by  Mr. 
Glenn  Brown,  F.  A.  I.  A.,  for  many  of 
the  facts  relative  to  Hadfield's  work. 


PORTFOLIO      OF 
CVR.R.ENT    AR.CHITE  CTVB.E 


RESIDENCE  OF  W.  PARK  MOORE. 
ESQ.,  ELKINS  PARK,  PA.  HEA- 
COCK  &  HOKANSON,  ARCHITECTS. 


276 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


RESIDENCE  OF  W.  PARK  MOORE, 
ESQ.,  ELKINS  PARK,  PA.  HEA- 
COCK  &  HOKANSON,  ARCHITECTS. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


I  I  1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 


alilBiiiiiiniii 

1 1  [  1 1 1 1 1 1  i  1 1 1 1 1 


NEW   POST  OFFICE,  WASHINGTON,   D.   C. 
Graham,  Burnham  &  Co.,  Architects. 


NEW  POST  OFFICE,  WASHINGTON,   D.   C. 
Graham,  Burnham  &  Co.,  Architects. 


N*EW  POST  OFFICE,  WASHINGTON,  D.  C. 
GRAHAM,  BtfRNHAM  &  CO.,  ARCHITECTS. 


NEW  POST  OFFICE,  WASHINGTON.  D.  C. 
GRAHAM,  BURNHAM  &  CO.,  ARCHITECTS. 


WE  PUTT    r     -     :  ' 


BOOKS  FROM  UNIVERSITY  PRESSES 

By  RICHARD  FRANZ  BACH 

Curator,  School  of  Architecture,  Columbia  University 
PART   I. 


\\//  HERE  there  is  no  state  supervis- 
YV  ion  of  the  publication  of  learned 
and  eminently  useful  works 
which  in  themselves  are  not  sufficiently 
well  supported  by  public  interest  or  finan- 
cial subsidy,  it  is  well  for  the  universities 
of  the  country  to  take  it  upon  themselves 
to  guarantee  that  certain  undertakings, 
especially  archaeological  researches  and 
phenomenal  scientific  advances,  often  too 
little  known  or  of  too  slight  monetary 
promise  to  be  handled  by  publishing 
firms,  shall  in  proper  form  see  the  light. 
In  Germany,  Austria  and  France  many 
such  contributions  to  human  knowledge 
are  fathered  by  the  respective  govern- 
ments, sometimes  by  schools  of  fine  arts 
or  by  altruistic  societies.  In  England, 
especially,  the  institutions  of  this  country 
have  found  their  prototypes  for  the  estab- 
lishment of  presses  under  the  control  of 
prominent  universities,  notably  at  Ox- 
ford and  Cambridge.  In  the  United 
States  a  number  of  such  presses  have 
latterly  come  into  being,  the  finest,  no 
doubt,  at  Yale,  Harvard,  Princeton  and 
Columbia.  From  the  standpoint  of  archi- 
tecture and  the  arts  the  first  three  men- 
tioned have  already  produced  excellent 


volumes,  while  Columbia  has  under  way 
extensive  plans  for  the  installation  of  the 
machinery  of  reproduction  and  the  han- 
dling of  its  own  printing  entirely  within 
campus  limits.  In  other  fields,  not  re- 
quiring the  expensive  means  for  making 
highly  finished  illustrations,  all  of  these 
institutions,  not  to  mention  the  Universi- 
ties of  Chicago  and  Pennsylvania,  have 
published  extended  series  of  authorita- 
tive books ;  as,  for  instance,  in  the  depart- 
ments of  history  or  of  philology. 

By  far  the  best  volume  which  has  thus 
far  been  issued  by  the  university  presses, 
both  for  intrinsic  value  and  for  book- 
making  skill,  is  that  by  William  Henry 
Goodyear,  entitled  Greek  Refinements; 
Studies  in  Temperamental  Architecture 
(Yale  University  Press,  New  Haven, 
Conn. ;  quarto,  pp.  xx — 227,  indices ; 
$10).  This  is  a  new  and  complete  re- 
statement of  the  matter  of  constructive 
curvatures  as  applied  to  Greek  building, 
and  it  is  intended  to  become — we  are 
grateful  to  learn — the  first  volume  in  a 
series,  of  which  the  second  will  concern 
the  medieval  aspect  of  the  subject.  Mr. 
Goodyear  has  achieved  new  laurels  with 
this  work  for  several  reasons;  and  not 


282 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


the  least  of  these  is  that  he  has  provided 
us  with  a  compact  modern  interpretation 
of  a  much-discussed  but  scholastically 
neglected  phase  of  antique  beauty,  which 
has  hitherto  appeared  only  in  widely  dis- 
seminated articles  in  the  periodicals  by 
Mr.  Goodyear  himself,  in  the  frequently 
ill-humored  attacks  upon  his  theories  and 
proofs  in  foreign  journals,  and  finally  in 
English  books  over  sixty  years  old  and 
not  suitable  for  general  use  because  of 
their  weight,  size  and  specialized  mode  of 
treatment.  The  new  volume  is  a  "sum- 
mary, but  systematic  and  readable,  ac- 
count" of  a  subject,  which  in  this  guise 
takes  on  a  fresh  life  and  vivid  interest, 
although  it  has  in  the  past  often  been 
visited  with  voluntary  ignorance ;  and  we 
can  assure  its  author  that  the  general  ap- 
preciation of  his  researches,  until  now  but 
grudgingly  accepted  by  those  who  could 
best  profit  by  them,  will  not  be  long  out- 
standing. No  doubt  he  will  reap  his 
greatest  harvest  in  the  schools,  where  the 
format  of  the  volume  will  commend  it  as 
a  standard  library  work. 

In  order  that  the  correct  definition  and 
application  of  the  term  "refinements" 
may  be  properly  construed,  let  us  first 
quote  the  author's  words,  on  page  3,  to 
the  effect  that  "  .  .  they  are  purposed 
departures  from  the  supposedly  geometric 
regularity  of  the  horizontal  and  perpen- 
dicular lines  in  the  Greek  temples,  and 
from  the  presumed  mathematical  equality 
of  their  apparently  corresponding  dimen- 
sions and  spaces."  And  here  we  have,  in 
the  present  reviewer's  opinion,  a  fair  esti- 
mate of  the  chief  reason  for  the  contin- 
ued incredulity  aroused  in  many,  even 
avowedly  professional  and  learned  circles, 
when  the  matter  of  intentional  curvature 
has  been  broached.  It  is  seen  in  Mr. 
Goodyear's  express  and  well-advised  use 
of  "supposedly,"  "presumed"  and  "appar- 
ently." Out  of  suppositions  and  pre- 
sumptions the  mind  creates  a  mirage,  an 
ideal,  or  a  superstition ;  surely  it  can,  by 
the  same  token,  also  create  a  wrong  im- 
pression— especially  when  the  erstwhile 
disconcerting  science  of  optics,  inaccurate 
knowledge  of  ancient  life,  ability  and  con- 
structive methods,  and  a  generally  be- 
fogged understanding  of  the  meaning  of 
Greek  life  in  relation  to  art  are  also  called 


into  play.  First  impressions  are  often 
lasting,  though  they  may  be  based  on  thin 
air,  hearsay  or  an  inborn  opinionative  in- 
clination. Again,  although  men  of  high 
standing  made  public  the  first  notice  of 
Greek  temple  curvatures,  no  such  extrav- 
agant reports  had  been  penned  by  Stuart 
and  Revett  or  Lord  Elgin,  who  had  with 
their  scaffoldings  climbed  to  all  parts  of 
the  Parthenon.  Yitruvius  himself,  whose 
writing  had  been  architectural  gospel  for 
centuries,  had  a  careful  passage  concern- 
ing the  construction  of  curves  in  eleva- 
tion; yet  the  1812  translation  of  his  book, 
edited  by  Wilkins,  contained  an  explicit 
footnote  to  the  effect  that  "they  were 
probably  never  actually  employed."  For 
these  reasons,  coupled  with  a  consistent 
unwillingness  on  the  part  of  readers, 
writers  and  students  to  test  authors'  sta,te- 
ments  by  the  monuments  themselves,  Mr. 
Goodyear  has  fought  down  a  host  of  op- 
ponents in  whose  inkpots  his  findings  had 
accomplished  an  unwonted  confusion.  By 
dint  of  archaeologic  conviction,  a  doughty 
spirit  and  a  sheaf  of  wholesome  facts,  he 
has  at  last  succeeded  in  establishing  the 
refinements  as  essential  members  in  the 
art  and  science  of  Greek  building,  arid  his 
efforts  may  be  said  to  culminate  in  the 
present  volume,  a  capstone  for  his  whole 
fabric. 

Those  who  still  cavil  at  the  structural 
intention  and  artistic  value  of  refinements 
in  building  may  be  said  to  stand  at  the 
gate  of  an  architectural  Samaria.  They 
jeered  at  the  "glamor  of  crooked  build- 
ing." The  deflections  were  so  slight  that 
they  were  not  observed  unless  sighted 
for,  and  those  who  mocked  had  done  no 
sighting;  what  is  more,  they  wilfully  ig- 
nored the  fact  that  measurements  and 
observations  of  the  masonry  itself  had  led 
the  pioneers  in  this  field  to  make  their 
declarations.  They  then  relied  upon  the 
fallibility  of  the  mason's  eye,  until  it  was 
demonstrated  that  "the  degree  of  error 
which  may  have  arisen  from  inaccuracy 
of  workmanship  in  the  Parthenon,"  i.  e., 
between  the  breadths  of  the  east  and  west 
fronts,  was  .022  of  an  inch,  or  one-fiftieth 
of  an  inch  in  101  feet.  This  matter  of 
the  quality  of  Greek  masonry  had,  fur- 
thermore, been  set  at  rest  by  Stuart,  who 
showed  that  the  finely  ground  stones  of 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


283 


the  steps  in  the  stylobate  of  the  Parthe- 
non, which  are  laid  without  mortar,  had 
by  what  the  chemist  and  physicist  call 
molecular  attraction,  practically  grown 
together.  What  is  more,  those  who  came 
to  scoff  were  not  loath  to  admit  the  ex- 
istence of  an  inward  leaning  of  columns 
and  of  vertical  faces  of  architrave  and 
frieze,  a  forward  leaning  of  antae,  verti- 
cal cornice  faces,  fronts  of  abaci,  acro- 
teria  and  antefixge,  and  a  leaning  toward 
each  other  of  door-jambs ;  and  they  were 
fully  assured  that  the  columns  and  capi- 
tals of  the  Parthenon  were  of  differing 
sizes  (the  maximum  variation  being  two 
and  one-quarter  inches),  that  intercol- 
umniations  varied  and  that  metopes  were 
not  of  uniform  width.  These  were  facts, 
incontrovertible  and  accepted  only  be- 
cause substantiated  by  measurements  ;  yet 
similar  truths  in  different  guise  and  sim- 
ilarly vouched  for  by  measurements,  even 
by  photographs,  were  met  with  ridicule 
when  described  as  curves  in  plan  or 
curves  in  elevation.  These  are  the  master 
curves,  for  they  demand  the  maximum 
building  skill  and  the  most  refined  aes- 
thetic sense. 

Mr.  Goodyear  disposes  finally  of  a 
number  of  erroneous  theories  which  have 
cluttered  the  progress  of  study  in  this 
field  and  have  obscured  or  misled  non- 
professional  students,  who  were  guided 
only  by  the  cursory  notices  in  art  histories 
and  text-books.  Among  these  incorrect 
assumptions  is  the  supposition  that  Greek 
refinements  "were  designed  as  optical 
corrections  of  optical  effects  of  irregular- 
ity," e.  g.,  the  upper  horizontal  curve  (in 
the  entablature)  as  a  correction  of  the  al- 
leged optical  effect  of  a  downward  sag- 
ging in  absolutely  straight  lines  of  similar 
length  similarly  placed.  This  is  contro- 
verted by  the  fact  that  the  optical  theory' 
involved  has  not  received  the  indorsement 
of  a  single  expert  in  optics,  although  men 
of  the  stamp  of  Hauck  and  Thiersch  have 
devoted  their  energies  to  a  solution  of  the 
problem;  furthermore,  it  is  controverted 
by  recent  investigations  of  inward  curves 
in  plan  at  Cori,  Pgestum  and  Egesta, 
which  show  that  "it  is  exactly  an  optical 
effect  of  sagging  downward  which  is 
actually  produced  by  these  concave  curves 
in  plan,  as  far  as  the  upper  horizontal 


lines  are  concerned" ;  and  finally  it  is  set 
at  nought  by  a  principle  in  the  elements 
of  perspective,  by  virtue  of  which  "lines 
above  the  level  of  the  eye,  and  especially 
on  near  approach,  curve  downward  to- 
ward the  extremities  and  not  toward  the 
center."  Another  explanation  hopelessly 
beside  the  mark  was  that  based  upon  the 
opinion  that  Greek  buildings  were  des- 
tined to  be  seen  from  fixed  points  of 
view.  This  cannot,  of  course,  hold  water 
in  face  of  the  extended  excavations  at 
Olympia,  Delphi  and  other  centers,  for 
each  spectator  would  require  a  municipal 
map  of  progress  through  these  cities,  with 
marked  points  of  accent,  so  that  he  might 
be  assured  of  a  proper  point  of  view  in 
accordance  with  that  intended  by  the 
architects  of  the  buildings. 

Yet  Mr.  Goodyear  does  not  ignore  the 
human  possibility  that  such  curvatures 
might  be  modulations  (1)  "designed  to 
please  the  eye  by  avoiding  the  inartistic 
effects  which  attend  formal  monotony ;" 
(2)  "intended  to  suggest  and  accent  de- 
sirable effects,"  or  (3)  "intended  to  avoid 
unpleasant  effects."  These  three  possi- 
bilities are  illustrated  in  order  ( 1 )  by  the 
horizontal  curvature ;  (2)  by  the  "con- 
vergence and  inward  leaning  of  the  main 
perpendicular  lines,  which  gives  an  effect 
of  solidity  and  strength;"  and  (3)  by  the 
decreasing  intercolumniations  between 
angle  columns  and  the  concomitant  "vari- 
ations in  the  metope  widths." 

Let  us  consider  briefly  the  history  of 
exploration  in  regard  to  Greek  refine- 
ments. To  begin  with,  none  of  these  de- 
flections from  geometric  regularity  were 
known  through  publications  before  1838. 
In  1836  horizontal  curvatures  in  the  Par- 
thenon were  first  noticed  by  Joseph  Hof- 
fer,  the  court  architect  of  the  contempo- 
rary Bavarian  king  of  Greece,  and  in 
1838  he  published  his  observations,  to- 
gether with  a  goodly  number  of  measure- 
ments, in  the  Wiener  Bauzeitung.  At 
about  the  same  time  and,  no  doubt,  inde- 
pendently, John  Pennethorne  observed 
the  same  curvatures  in  the  Parthenon,  not 
to  mention  others  in  the  Theseion  and  the 
Athenian  Propylaea ;  but  only  after  a 
study  of  the  directions  given  by  Vitruvius 
and  a  journey  to  Egypt  (in  1833),  where 
he  found  other  curves  in  plan  in  the  tem- 


284 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


pie  of  Medinet  Habu.  Pennethorne's  in- 
vestigations found  form  in  a  p.-aiphlet 
privately  circulated  in  184^f  and  in  a  folio 
volume  published  in  1878  entitled  Geome- 
try and  Optics  of  the  Ancients.  The  task 
of  investigation  in  this  field  was  next  un- 
dertaken by  Francis  Cranmer  Penrose, 
its  chief  apostle  before  Mr.  Goodyear, 
and  whose  results  were  published  in  1851 
under  the  title  An  Investigation  of  the 
Principles  of  Athenian  Architecture. 
This  was  up  to  the  time  of  the  publica- 
tion of  the  volume  under  discussion  the 
best  and  most  general  work  in  the  field, 
but  its  bulky  proportions  and  specialist's 
point  of  view  precluded  its  general  use- 
fulness. We  can  safely  say  that  the  aegis 
has  now  been  transferred  to  new  shoul- 
ders. Nor  has  Mr.  Goodyear's  advocacy 
of  the  aesthetic  quality  of  these  deflec- 
tions been  the  joyful  path  of  a  bringer  of 
welcome  news  ;  for  he  has  shared  the  fate 
of  every  prophet,  being,  in  the  nature  of 
things,  without  honor  in  his  own  country. 
The  author's  studies  date  from  1868, 
when  he  learned  his  first  steps  in  this  di- 
rection from  Carl  Friedrichs  of  the  Ber- 
lin Museum,  and  were  propagated  and 
widened  in  scope  by  suggestions  found  in 
Forster,  Burckhardt  and  Ruskin  to  in- 
clude similar  deflections  in  Italo-Byzan- 
tine and  Italian-Romanesque  buildings. 
After  several  years  of  study,  extending  to 
1874,  the  researches  were  discontinued 
until  1895,  when  were  begun  the  deep 
studies  which  have  since  that  time,  thanks 
to  Mr.  Goodyear's  unflagging  zeal,  grad- 
ually gathered  to  themselves  a  definite 
form  and  reality  in  the  minds  of  men, 
professional  and  others,  so  that  the  Greek 
refinements  now  constitute  an  undeniable 
and  accepted  factor  in  the  Greek  con- 
structive system. 

It  is  noteworthy  that  at  the  very  be- 
ginning of  these  discoveries  Hoffer's  ac- 
count gives  due  credit  for  the  aesthetic  as 
.well  as  the  structural  value  of  his  find- 
ings. For  instance,  he  says :  "In  modern 
times  great  porticos,  of  at  least  equally 
large  dimensions,  have  been  built,  and  yet 
we  have  not  been  able  to  achieve  the 
same  satisfactory  effect  .  .  we  find  then 
that  the  Greeks  were  not  content  to  build 
their  temples  according  to  narrow  rules 
or  according  to  such  a  canon  as  Vitruvius, 


or  the  modern  architects,  endeavor  to  es- 
tablish, but  that  everything  was  with 
them  a  matter  of  feeling.  They  had  the 
feeling,  which  was  encouraged  by  their 
high  culture  and  their  happy  climate,  that 
straight  lines  have  a  cramped  and  stiff 
effect  (einen  beengenden  und  starren  Ein- 
druck)."  In  this  connection  Mr.  Good- 
year's  subtitle,  Studies  in  Temperamental 
Architecture,  should  be  noted,  and  also 
his  statement,  on  page  68,  that  " .  .  the 
classic  horizontal  curvatures  were  tem- 
peramental refinements  inspired  by  the 
sentiment  of  beauty  and  by  artistic  pref- 
erence, and  not  by  a  desire  to  exaggerate 
by  optical  correction  the  formalism,  stiff- 
ness and  rigidity  of  straight  lines."  And 
it  is  interesting  to  trace  in  the  writings  of 
other  art  historians  of  note  a  similar  in- 
tentional avoidance  of  any  theory  of  pure 
optics  and  a  decided  insistence  upon  the 
temperamental  quality  as  raison  d'etre  for 
the  Greek  refinements.  Witness  Kugler's 
opinion  that  the  desired  result  was  "an 
effect  of  breathing  life" ;  or  Schnaase's, 
"a  feeling  of  life  inspired  the  whole 
building";  or  Burckhardt's,  "These 
(curves)  are  the  expression  of  the  same 
feeling  which  .  .  everywhere  sought  to 
give  to  apparently  mathematical  forms 
the  pulsation  of  a  living  organism."  Sim- 
ilar passages  of  generally  identical  con- 
tent may  be  found  in  Michaelis,  Boutmy, 
Choisy,  Anderson,  Spiers,  Percy  Gardner 
and  Ruskin. 

An  interesting  section  of  Mr.  Good- 
year's  book  is  that  concerning  the  uni- 
versality of  the  use  of  horizontal  refine- 
ments, and  another  is  that  concerning  the 
method  of  construction  of  horizontal 
curves  in  temple  platforms.  After  read- 
ing an  account  with  such  a  sharp  focus 
as  that  contained  in  the  present  volume, 
it  is  not  difficult  to  assume  that  these  plan 
and  elevation  deflections  were  of  univer- 
sal application.  The  reverse  is  demon- 
strated by  the  author  and  the  reason  for 
the  absence  of  curves  in  certain  cases  is 
found  in  the  necessary  economy  of  labor 
and  of  money  practiced  when  buildings 
were  erected  in  times  of  national  stress. 
This  reason  would  not,  of  course,  affect 
stylobate  deflections,  but  chiefly  the  sub- 
sequently necessary  grinding  of  the  beds 
of  the  lower  column  drums  to  give  them 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


285 


the  proper  position  and  inward  inclination 
under  the  conditions  of  a  curved  base. 
Temples  without  horizontal  curves  are 
the  Erectheion  at  Athens,  built  eight 
years  after  the  completion  of  the  Parthe- 
non, the  temple  of  Nike  Apteros,  also  on 
the  Acropolis  and  likewise  of  the  fifth 
century  B.  C.,  the  temple  at  Phigaleia,  of 
which  the  architects  of  the  Parthenon 
were  also  the  authors,  the  temples  at 
Aegina  and  at  Rhamnus,  both  the  Zeus 
and  the  Hera  temples  at  Olympia,  and 
the  sixth  century  Greek  Basilica  at  Paes- 
tum  in  southern  Italy. 

There  are  therefore  a  number  of  im- 
portant buildings  in  which  refinements  of 
the  horizontal  type  at  least  do  not  play. 
any  part  at  all.  Apart  from  the  possible 
reason  above  stated,  there  may  be  one 
other  important  cause  for  the  omission  of 
such  deflections,  namely,  the  desire  of  the 
architect  in  question.  Says  Mr.  Good- 
year on  page  115  :  "How  did  the  introduc- 
tion of  these  various  Greek  devices  actu- 
ally come  about,  as  a  matter  of  fact? 
Common  sense  would  lead  us  to  suppose 
that,  aside  from  Egyptian  influence  or  ex- 
ample in  the  matter  of  curves,  and  per- 
haps also  in  other  directions,  the  intro- 
duction of  the  Greek  refinements  was 
gradual,  tentative,  and  experimental,  and 
that  it  was  also  temperamental,  and  con- 
trolled by  the  susceptibilities  and  sensi- 
tiveness of  the  individual  architect.  Only 
this  point  of  view  could  explain  the  varia- 
tions in  the  measurements  for  the  same 
refinement  in  different  buildings."  We 
have,  therefore,  a  free  and  spontaneous 
and,  better  yet,  individual  interpretation 
in  the  execution  of  Greek  refinements ; 
they  are  not  only  tolerated  but  obviously 
intentional  and  really  a  part  of  design  as 
we  understand  it.  And  this  is  a  new  con-  . 
tribution  toward  the  proper  definition  of 
that  much  maltreated  descriptive  adjec- 
tive, classic. 

The  matter  of  the  method  of  laying 
stereobate  or  stylobate  stones  in  order  to 
obtain  the  desired  curvature  is  made  clear 
by  the  author's  reference  to  Emile  Bur- 
nouf's  explanation,  dated  as  long  ago  as 
1875,  of  Vitruvius'  directions  concerning 
the  use  of  scamilli  impares,  or  unequal 
sighting  projections  (scamillus  is  best 
translated  by  the  French  word  nivelette}. 


The  scamilli  on  the  individual  blocks  were 
of  varying  sizes,  graded  according  to  po- 
sition— shorter  on  the  middle  blocks,  tall- 
er on  those  in  the  extremities  of  the  stylo- 
bate — and  by  sighting  properly  along 
their  points,  the  calculated  curvature  was 
readily  obtained.  It  is  obvious  that  a  sim- 
ilar method  would  also  be  feasible  for  set- 
ting out  curves  in  plan. 

In  order  to  make  his  book  sufficiently 
inclusive,  Mr.  Goodyear  also  devotes  a 
section  to  vertical  inclinations  in  Greek 
temples ;  notably  the  inward  lean  of  the 
columns  (pointed  out  by  Donaldson  in 
1829),  with  the  consequent  diagonal  in- 
clination of  the  corner  shafts,  the  for- 
ward leaning  of  antse,  the  entasis  (which 
has  been  published  only  since  1810)  and 
the  diminution  of  columnar  diameters.  A 
thoroughly  illuminating  chapter  is  that  on 
"Asymmetric  dimensions  in  Greek  tem- 
ples," wherein  is  adequately  set  forth  that 
formal  regularity  was  not  the  "desirable 
ideal  of  classic  architecture."  In  this  con- 
nection is  discussed  the  Hera  Temple  at 
Olympia,  with  its  heterogeneous  columns 
which,  according  to  Dorpfeld,  superseded 
original  timber  shafts  in  the  order  of 
their  decay  and  therefore  illustrate  a 
number  of  successive  phases  in  the  treat- 
ment of  column  and  capital.  These  dis- 
crepancies are  seen  in  a  new  light  when 
discussed  in  the  same  paragraph  with 
similar  variations  at  Selinus,  in  Temple 
G ;  nor  are  we  yet  satisfied  with  any  ex- 
planations thus  far  advanced  in  regard  to 
Greek  indulgence  on  this  head;  for  ob- 
viously, according  to  Durm,  "it  did  not 
offend  the  Greek  sense  of  beauty  to  allow 
columns  of  quite  unlike  form  in  the  same 
building  side  by  side."  An  amazing  ex- 
ample of  such  disparity  of  column  diam- 
eters is  seen  at  Syracuse  in  Ortygia, 
where  in  the  sixth  century  Apollo  Temple 
the  two  remaining  "monolithic  angle  col- 
umns, on  the  same  front,  differ  by  a  foot 
(thirty  cm.)  in  diameter."  From  Mr. 
Goodyear's  instructive  chapter  on  the 
many  Greek  asymmetries,  those  in  plan 
dimensions,  spacing  and  diameter  of  col- 
umns, and  others,  we  may,  then,  select  the 
following  concise  statement  of  the  case: 
"The  fact  thus  stands  out  in  bold  relief 
that  both  systematic  and  unsystematic  ir- 
regularities are  found  in  the  same  Greek 


286 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


temples."  And  this  is  followed  by  the 
promise  of  a  subsequent  volume  on  the 
curvatures  in  buildings  of  a  later  date ; 
therefore  we  obtain  a  foothold  and  par- 
allel for  demonstrations  in  later  volumes 
of  these  studies  that  the  existence  of  un- 
systematic irregularities  of  dimension  in 
a  given  medieval  cathedral,  does  not  pre- 
clude or  discredit  the  existence  of  system- 
atic irregularities  in  the  same  cathedral. 
This  gives  us  no  little  food  for  thought  by 
way  of  anticipation ;  we  eagerly  await  the 
study  of  the  medieval  refinements,  for 
these  have  been  made  the  target  of  the 
most  virulent  attacks  in  the  past. 

Finally  we  heartily  congratulate  Mr. 
Goodyear  upon  this  notable  volume,  its 
scholarly  and  efficient  arrangement,  and 
its  sterling  subject  matter.  For  purposes 
of  demonstration  and  suitable  reference 
an  appendix  is  added  to  each  chapter ; 
the  footnotes  are  lettered  and  appendix 
sections  are  indicated  in  the  body  of  the 
text  by  numbers.  There  is  also  an  index 
of  authorities  with  page  references,  and 
an  analyzed  index  of  subject  matter.  The 
book  is  a  .fine  example  of  American  ideals 
in  typography  and  illustration,  as  well  as 
of  the  exacting  standard  of  the  Yale  Uni- 
versity Press. 

OLD   PHILADELPHIA. 

v\  TT  E  have  in  our  Atlantic  Seaboard 
My  States  a  wealth  of  worthy  archi- 
tectural remains  from  the  eigh- 
teenth century,  and  all  too  few  of 
them  are  widely  known.  Many  of  these 
old  buildings  are  in  places  difficult  to 
reach  and  there  is  no  accessible  or  ac- 
curate record  of  the  details  and  features 
that  give  them  their  peculiar  charm. 
Year  by  year  the  ancient  structures  grow 
less  in  number  and  with  the  demolition  of 
each  one  we  suffer  an  irreparable  loss  to 
our  heritage  which  is  only  mitigated  in 
some  degree  by  the  possession  of  accu- 
rate measurements  and  drawings. 

The  authors  of  Old  Philadelphia  Colo- 
nial Details*  have  reaped  in  a  fat  field, 

*Old  Philadelphia  Colonial  Details.  Measured  and 
Drawn  by  Joseph  Patterson  Sims  and  Charles 
Willing.  New  York :  Architectural  Book  Publish- 
ing Co.,  $10. 


for  Philadelphia  and  the  neighboring 
country  offer  an  abundance  of  valuable 
architectural  material  that  has  scarcely 
been  touched.  Of  the  fifty  odd  large  folio 
plates,  drawn  chiefly  at  three-fourths  inch 
scale  or  else  in  full  size,  thirteen  are  de- 
voted to  Hope  Lodge,  built  in  1723  and 
an  excellent  example  of  early  Georgian 
work.  Seven  plates  are  given  to  Graeme 
Park,  Horsham,  built  in  1722  by  Sir 
William  Keith.  Graeme  Park,  owing  to 
its  location,  is  difficult  to  reach  and,  as 
the  house  presents  one  of  the  finest  ex- 
amples of  early  Georgian  panelling,  and 
moulding  details,  one  wishes  that  even 
more  space  might  have  been  bestowed 
upon  it.  Cliveden  in  Germantown  also 
has  seven  plates.  To  the  State  House 
(Independence  Hall)  are  given  five 
plates,  the  south  elevations  being  from 
measurements  made  by  Messrs.  Brockie 
and  Hastings. 

Three  city  houses,  338  Spruce  Street ; 
the  Stocker  house,  402  South  Front 
Street,  and  the  Bishop  White  house  at 
Front  and  Pine  Streets,  have  respectively 
three,  four  and  three  plates.  Those  of 
the  Stocker  house,  built  about  1768,  are 
particularly  interesting  because  they 
show  the  beginnings  of  Adam  influence 
in  American  work.  The  rest  of  the 
plates  are  taken  up  with  various  details, 
including  the  panelled  side  of  the  parlor 
at  Whitby  Hall,  some  interesting  pieces 
of  exterior  ironwork  along  the  river 
front  and  doors  and  mantels  from  the 
King  of  Prussia  Inn  (now  demolished) 
in  Germantown. 

It  is  to  be  regretted  that  the  word  "Co- 
lonial" in  the  title  is  somewhat  mislead- 
ing, for  the  work  illustrated  is  all  Georg- 
ian and  there  is  not  a  single  piece  that  is 
truly  Colonial.  In  a  book  of  such  excel- 
lent purpose  and,  in  the  main,  creditable 
execution,  it  is  unfortunate  that  such  a 
concession  should  have  been  made  to 
popular  laxity  in  the  application  of  the 
terms  "Colonial"  and  "Georgian." 

It  is  distinctly  gratifying  to  note  the 
large  share  of  attention  that  has  been 
given  to  mouldings  and  to  the  faithful 
presentation  of  their  profiles. 

H.  D.  E. 


NOTES 
AND 
MMENTS 


The   First 
City 


After  six  years  of  con- 
struction France  has 
opened  her  first  garden 
city,  at  Draveil,  near  the 
gates  of  Paris.  No  doubt 
another  period  of  even 
greater  length  will  pass 
before  the  whole  work 
of  plantation,  laying  out  of  streets,  and 
sanitation  is  completed,  not  to  mention  the 
erection  of  some  five  or  six  hundred  dwell- 
ings, of  which  but  fifty  are  now  standing. 
France  at  last  feels  acutely  the  need  for 
proper  building  facilities  to  provide  a  solu- 
tion for  the  problems  of  city  crowding  and 
inadequate  housing,  although  both  England 
and  Germany  have  these  many  years  set 
her  a  consistently  praiseworthy  example, 
with  tangible  results  in  the  form  of  greater 
health  and  lower  mortality.  It  is  surely 
time  that  a  nation  threatened  by  the  omin- 
ous shadow  of  a  falling  birth  rate  should 
give  attention  to  the  greater  care  of  chil- 
dren. It  is  for  these  that  the  garden  city 
will  offer  the  greatest  benefits  in  the  way 
of  normal  growth  and  physical  efficiency, 
which  are  invariably  an  asset  to  the  nation 
at  large. 


For  six  or  seven  years 
the    Germans   have   been 
Ingenious          at    work    preparing    new 
Repairs  to         uniform    concrete    foun-' 
Strasburg          dations    for    one    of    the 
Cathedral.          142      metre      spires      of 
Strasburg  Cathedral. 
The    undertaking    would 
not  have  been  completed  until  1917,  but  has 
now,  of  course,  been  indefinitely  postponed. 
The  method  of  carrying  out  the  necessary 
repairs  is  of  the  utmost  interest.     A  com- 
plete   circle    of    concrete    piles    was    sunk 
around    the    base    of    the    spire     and     their 
heads  bound  together  by  a  concrete  crown. 
The  earth  around  these  piles  was  saturated 


by  hydraulic  pressure  with  a  thin  cement, 
or  "milk  of  cement."  Another  concrete 
unit  or  "collar"  was  prepared  to  form  a 
base  for  the  tower  itself,  and  between  this 
and  the  previously  mentioned  concrete 
crown  the  actual  work  of  support  during 
operations  was  done  by  twelve  powerful 
jacks.  After  the  whole  weight  of  the  tower 
has  been  brought  to  rest  upon  these  provi- 
sional foundations',  the  old  stone  under- 
structure  will  be  removed  and  superseded  by 
an  immense  "thimble"  of  concrete  which  is 
destined  to  serve  as  the  final  foundation. 
The  whole  work  will  cost  not  less  than 
$500,000. 


The      exposition       en- 
titled  "L'Art  pour   1'En- 
An  Exposition     fance,"    recently   held    in 
of    Art  the   Galliera   Museum   in 

for  Children.  Paris,  succeeded  in  as- 
sembling a  most  re- 
markable collection  of 
works  in  a  rather  unus- 
ual field.  The  exhibits  were  extremely 
various  in  nature,  including  pictures  of 
children,  historic  children's  costumes,  peas- 
ant toys,  books,  nursery  decorations,  and 
other  artistic  efforts,  and  it  was  a  revela- 
tion to  the  casual  visitor  to  note  how  large 
a  part  children  play  in  the  modern  ar- 
tistic world.  The  court  of  the  museum  was 
filled  with  play-houses  of  various  types, 
exhibited  by  the  Paris  department  stores: 
houses  varying  from  the  architecture  of  the 
thatched  Breton  cabin  to  that  of  the  trel- 
lised  arbor.  In  the  main  hall  toys  vied 
in  interest  with  portraits  of  children,  il- 
lustrated children's  books  and  quaint  cos- 
tumes of  the  eighteenth  century.  But  the 
exhibits  in  the  long  gallery  at  the  rear 
were,  perhaps,  the  most  interesting  of  all. 
Here  a  number  of  small  sections  were  di- 
vided off  to  show  attempts  at  nursery  deco- 
ration. One  of  these  compartments,  with 


288 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


CHILD'S  ROOM  BY  MISS  JESSIE  KING-EXPOSI. 
TION   DE   L'ART    POUR   L'ENFANCE. 

white  walls  and  cream-colored  furniture, 
was  the  work  of  Miss  Lloyd;  the  English, 
it  seems,  excel  in  this  form  of  art.  The 
high  dado  around  the  room  was  white,  with 
light  blue  dots,  surmounted  by  a  frieze  of 
gray,  decorated  with  conventional  flowers 
in  natural  colors.  The  insets  in  the  fur- 
niture were  of  yellow  rattan,  with  colored 
pictures  of  animals  to  add  an  additional 
note  of  gayety.  Another  nursery  interior, 
by  Miss  Jessie  King,  of  Glasgow,  was  al- 
most entirely  in  blue 
and  white,  and  its 
air  of  brightness  and 
cleanliness  delighted 
all  the  mothers  who 
visited  theexposition. 
The  blue  walls  and 
white-painted  wood- 
work and  furniture 
were  relieved  by  de- 
signs in  gay  colors, 
green  and  yellow 
predominating.  The  floor  was  a  dark  gray, 
the  curtains'  light  blue.  This  room  had  a 
large  window,  with  insets  of  colored  glass, 
whose  light  tones  added  animation  to  the 
general  effect  without  greatly  reducing  the 
amount  of  sunlight  admitted  to  the  nursery. 
The  room  contained,  in  addition  to  its 
ingenious  built-in  cupboards  and  window 
seat,  and  the  usual  table  and  chairs,  a  most 
charming  dolls'  house,  designed  in  the 
style  of  the  room,  and  a  remarkable  hobby- 
horse, this  latter  being  the  work  of  Mile. 
Isabelle  de  Nolde. 

In  the  same  gallery,  ranged  along  the  op- 
posite wall,  were  the  delightful  toys  de- 
signed by  Andre  Helle,  the  well-known 
humorist.  Here  we  have  a  procession  of 
cut-out  wooden  toys,  representing  the  King 
(Louis  XIV,  to  judge  by  the  costumes  of 
his  following)  on  the  way  to  the  war.  This 
type  of  wooden  toys,  of  which  Helle  and 


GIRL'S   ROOM    BY    MISS   LLOYD— EXPOSITION 
DE  L'ART  POUR  L'ENFANCE. 


WOODEN   TOYS   BY   ANDRE   HELLE-EXPOSI- 
TION  DE  L'ART  POUR  L'ENFANCE. 

Canau  d'Ache  have  produced  such  excel- 
lent examples,  is  one  that  deserves  a  great 
degree  of  popularity.  Because  of  the  sim- 
plicity of  the  construction,  excellent  de-  ' 
signs  are  possible  at  small  expense,  and 
surely  these  vigorous  silhouettes,  with  their 
bright  colors',  should  appeal  more  highly 
to  the  imagination  of  the  child  than  the 
stuffed  horses  and  woolly  lambs  of  our 
own  less  fortunate  infancy.  Helle  exhibit- 
ed also,  in  addition  to  his  wooden  toys. 
pages  from  his  books 
for  children,  illus- 
trated in  much  the 
same  spirit,  wall- 
papers for  nurseries, 
and  other  similar 
designs,  but  the 
toys  seem  to  have 
the  widest  appeal. 
Wooden  toys  of  the 


same  type  have  met 
with  considerable 
success  in  Germany,  and  there  seems  no 
reason  why  America  should  offer  a  less 
promising  field  for  a  similar  experiment. 

The    Hotel    Biron, 

after    many    vicissitudes. 

will  at  last  find  a  perma- 

The  Hotel  Biron  nent     owner     in     the 

a  National         French  government.  The 

Monument.         building   is   one    of   last- 

ing beauty  and  a  fine  ex- 

ample of  the  manner  of 

Jacques  Gabriel,  from  whose  designs  it  was 

erected   in   1730.      It   is   now   to   become  a 

"national  monument"  and  a  depository  for 

the  Musee  Rodin,  in  which  will  be  exhibited 

Greek  and   Egyptian   collections  owned  by 

the  great  sculptor,  as  well  as  much  of  his 

personal  work.      The  establishment  of  this 

museum  but  slightly  antedates  that  founded 

by  the   same  artist   in    London. 


**« 


I 


ft 


' 


V 


fc  •* 


• 


pp 


n^ 


9 


i 


PUB  LISHE 

IN  NE\</  YO 


XNTSaCOPY 
&  YE 


ni 

ii  ill 


V    K 


:: 


*r 


Space  is  vital  in  the  mod- 
ern office  building.  Any 
method  of  construction 
that  economizes  it  is  sure 
to  interest  you.  You  can 

specify    2"    solid    partitions    if    the 

plaster  is  laid  on  a  base  of 


Expanded    Metal    Lath 

and  be  sure  of  satisfactory  results. 

"Kno-Burn"  has  other  advantages.  It  is  fire-proof, 
easy  to  apply  and  easy  to  plaster  over  and  equally 
suitable  for  walls,  partitions,  stairways  and  ceilings. 

"Kno-Burn  Expanded  Metal  Lath"  is  our  newest  booklet. 
We  should  like  to  have  you  look  it  over  and  then  file  i't  for 
reference. 

Send  us  your  address  today. 


NORTHWESTERN  EXPANDED 
METAL  CO. 

910  Old  Colony  Bldg.,  Chicago,  111.       fg   Jf^ 


VOL.  XXXV1L     No.  4 


APRIL,  1915 


SERIAL  NO.  199 


ARCHITECTVRAL 
sj>    RECORD 


COVER-AN  ITALIAN  GARDEN.    By  C.  Matlack  Price  t»w 

THE  MEDIAEVAL  MARKET  PLAGE  AT  YPRES  .  .  .289 

By  G.  A.  T.  Middleton 

RECENT  ASPECTS  OF  GARDEN  DESIGN  .  .  .  .300 

By  Harold  D.  Eberlein 

THE  HOTEL  STATLER  IN  DETROIT:    Geo.  B.  Post  £-  Sons,  Architects     ,      320 

By  W.  Sydney  Wagner 

THE    GROUPING    OF    FARM    BUILDINGS:      Examples    from  the  Work   of 

Alfred  Hopkins        -  340 

By  John  J.  Klaber 

COLONIAL  ARCHITECTURE  IN  CONNECTICUT  .      360 

Text  and  Measured  Drawings  by  Wesley  Sherwood  Bessell 

PORTFOLIO  OF  CURRENT  ARCHITECTURE  -      370 

THE  ARCHITECT'S  LIBRARY:    Books  from  University  Presses.     Part  II  -        379 

NOTES  AND  COMMENTS     -  383 

Editor :  MICHAEL  A.  MIKKELSEN.  Contributing  Editor :    HERBERT  D.  CROLY 

Advertising  Manager :    AUSTIN  L.  BLACK 

Yearly  Subscription— United  States  $3.00  Entered   May   22.    1902.   as  Second  Copyright    1915  by  The   Architectural 

—Foreign  $4.00— Single  Copies   35  cents  Class    Matter,  at  New  York,    N.  Y.  Record  Con>oany— All  Rights  Reserved 

PUBLISHED    MONTHLY    BY 

THE  ARCHITECTURAL   RECORD   COMPANY 


115-119  WEST  FORTIETH  STREET,  NEW  YC.  'K 


F.   W.    DODGE,    President 


F.    T.    MIDLER,    Secretary  and  Treasurer 


PERGOLA  AND  TERRACE-GARDEN  AT  BEA- 
CON HILL  HOUSE,"  ESTATE  OF  ARTHUR  CUR- 
TISS  JAMES,  ESQ.,  NEWPORT,  R.  I.  OLM- 
STED  BROTHERS,  LANDSCAPE  ARCHITECTS. 


AKC 


THE 

ITECTVRAL 


RECORD 


APRIL,  1915 


VOLVME  XXXVII 


NVMBER  IV 


MEDIAEVAL  MARKET  PLACE 
°f  YPRES.  AN  IRREPARABLE  WAR 
LOSS  TO  ARCHITECTVRE^ 

BY  C.A.T.MIDDLETON 


THE  bombardment  and  consequent 
destruction  of  Ypres,  being  a  legit- 
imate act  of  war,  has  not  caused 
a  shudder  to  pass  through  the  civilized 
world  as  did  the  burning  of  '.Louvain, 
but  it  is  quite  doubtful  whether  the  archi- 
tectural loss  has  not  been  greater.  No 
Gothic  group  of  buildings  in  Europe,  ex- 
cept that  at  Westminster,  which  owes 
much  to  the  modern  Houses  of  Parlia- 
ment, could  compare  with  that  which 
the  Grande  Place  of  Ypres  disclosed — 
the  largest  market  square  in  Belgium,  but 
by  no  means  frequently  visited  by  for- 
eigners, who  were  more  attracted  to  the 
flourishing  neighboring  towns  of  Bruges 
and  Ghent,  these  being  more  generally 
accessible.  Like  Westminster,  the  group 
consisted  of  two  great  buildings  only — 
the  Cloth  Hall  and  the  Church  of  St. 
Martin — emphasized  only  by  the  juxta- 
position and  inclusion  in  the  general  mass 


of  many  works  of  minor  importance, 
greatly  differing  from  one  another,  yet 
in  perfect  harmony ;  and,  as  at  Westmin- 
ster again,  the  greatest  building  of  all 
was  not  ecclesiastical. 

The  history  of  Ypres  cannot  be  traced 
with  certainty  further  back  than  the  sec- 
ond half  of  the  tenth  century,  when  it 
consisted  of  a  few  houses  grouped  round 
a  small  castle  on  an  island  of  the  Yper- 
lea  (the  river  now  so  well  known  as  the 
Lys);  probably  of  similar  character  to 
several  marshy  islands  still  formed  by 
the  river,  which  almost  wholly  circles  the 
town,  along  the  lines  of  the  moat  of  the 
middle  ages,  just  outside  the  walls.  It 
grew  with  great  rapidity,  for  in  a  hun- 
dred years  (a  short  space  of  time  in  those 
days  for  so  much  progress  to  be  made) 
it  had  become  quite  an  important  town, 
a  center  of  the  cloth  weaving  industry, 
possessing  two  parish  churches  some  dis- 


290 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


FONT,  ST.  MARTIN'S  CHURCH,  YPRES. 

tance  apart ;  and  within  another  hundred 
years  it  had  become  the  metropolis  of 
Flanders,  with  a  population  of  no  less 
than  200,000,  not  all  cooped  up  in  the 
narrow  circuit  of  the  walls  but  spreading 
out  into  suburbs,  where  a  large  home- 
weaving  industry  was  carried  on. 

It  was  at  this  period  of  unexampled 
prosperity  when  the  great  Church  of  St. 
Martin — the  most  beautiful  church  in 
Belgium — and  the  even  greater  Cloth 
Hall,  unparalleled  amongst  secular  build- 
ings of  the  Gothic  era,  were  erected. 
Both  of  these  have  now  almost  wholly 
disappeared.  The  extent  of  the  damage 
done  can  be  gauged  by  comparing  the 
general  sketch  of  the  group  from  the 
Grande  Place,  made  in  1910,  with  the 
photograph  taken  from  almost  the  same 
position  recently,  though  the  latter  does 
not  include  so  much  as  the  former.  It 
will  be  particularly  noticed  that  the  whole 
of  the  Hotel  de  Ville  (locally  known  as 
the  Nieuwercke)  has  been  swept  away. 

Possibly,  however,  the  loss  which 
architecture  has  sustained  can  best  be 
understood  by  describing  and  illustrating 
these  buildings  as  they  were  before  the 
war — as  the  writer  has  known  them  for 
a  period  of  some  twenty  years,  without 
material  change  till  now. 


The  Church  of  St.  Martin,  generally 
known  as  the  Cathedral,  though  it  ceased 
to  be  the  seat  of  a  bishopric  a  long  while 
since,  was  built  on  the  site  of  another 
church  whjch  was  begun  in  1073.  This, 
like  many  another  Romanesque  edifice, 
was  demolished  in  the  thirteenth  century 
to  make  room  for  one  more  in  keeping 
with  the  growing  wealth  and  importance 
of  the  town,  and  the  present  choir  was 
commenced  in  1221.  It  was  apsidal, 
without  the  usual  chevet  of  chapels,  and 
probably  followed  the  plan  and  was  built 
on  the  foundations  of  the  earlier  apse,  if 
indeed  this  was  ever  entirely  pulled 
down,  for  the  arcading  of  the  triforium 
was  of  early  and  severe  Romanesque 
character,  and  externally  the  pointed 
lancet  windows  above  (of  almost  Eng- 
lish character)  were  continued  in  Romap- 
esque  arches.  The  cylindrical  piers,  with 
capitals  whose  foliage  represent  the 
broad  leaves  of  the  hart's-tongue  fern, 
were  typical  of  thirteenth  century  work, 
whether  of  Belgium  or  Northern  France, 
but  in  themselves  were  not  conclusive 
evidence  of  early  date,  for  such  are  to 
be  found  occasionally  in  later  work,  and 
in  fact  occur,  with  scarcely  any  modifi- 


INTERIOR  OF  ST.  MARTIN'S  CHURCH, 
LOOKING  EAST. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


201 


cation,  in  the  nave  also,  though  this  was 
not  commenced  till  1254,  when  it  was 
pushed  on  rapidly,  being  finished  twelve 
years  later.  The  nave  piers,  however, 
differed  from  those  of  the  choir  in  hav- 
ing statues  protruding  from  them,  in  the 
same  fashion  as  in  the  Cathedral  at 
Malines,  while  in  the  choir  statues 
were  introduced  above  the  capitals,  where 
they  had  the  appearance,  though  not  the 
actuality,  of  serving  as  corbels  for  the 
vaulting  shafts  to  spring  from.  The 
vaulting  was  all  of  the  simple  quadri- 
partite character  generally  found  on  the 
continent  of  Europe,  the  filling  being  ar- 
ranged as  it  would  be  in  France ;  so  that 
in  all  essentials  the  church  was  of  French 
type  internally,  except  for  the  absence  of 
the  chevet.  Even  the  nave  arches  were 
almost  unmoulded,  having  only  a  roll  on 
the  outer  angle,  while  the  inner  order 
was  chamfered,  thus  following  the  se- 
vere French  fashion,  which  retained  the 
Romanesque  mouldings  in  all  their  sim- 
plicity till  the  end  of  the  fourteenth  cen- 
tury, in  apparent  ignorance  of  the  elab- 
orately beautiful  groupings  of  undercut 
mouldings  which  were  being  evolved  and 
gradually  modified  in  England  at  that 
time. 


CONFESSIONAL,  ST.  MARTIN'S  CHURCH, 
YPRES. 


CHOIR  STALLS,  ST.  MARTIN'S  CHURCH. 
YPRES. 

The  church  furniture,  if  one  may  judge 
from  photographs  of  the  remains,  appears 
to  have  suffered  less  than  might  have 
been  anticipated,  for  although  the  finely 
carved  and  unusually  well  restrained 
wooden  pulpit,  with  its  statue  of  St. 
Thomas  of  Aquin,  and  its  heavy  sound- 
ing board  so  cleverly  constructed  as  to 
look  as  if  it  were  floating  in  the  air,  have 
apparently  all  disappeared,  the  world- 
famous  choir  stalls  seem  to  be  intact. 
These  were  the  work  of  the  carver  Tail- 
lebert,  a  native  of  Ypres,  and  were  in- 
serted in  1598,  a  date  which  would  make 
them  contemporary  with  the  Jacobean 
work  of  England  to  which  they  are 
greatly  superior,  the  only  resemblance 
being  in  the  generally  low  relief  adopted. 
The  bishop's  throne,  shown  in  the  photo- 
graph, is  a  remarkably  fine  piece  of 
work  which  well  repays  a  close  study. 

Just  behind  the  choir  stalls,  and  stand- 
ing in  the  choir  aisle,  there  used  to  be, 
and  possibly  still  is,  a  confessional  box 
of  a  later  and  more  florid  type  of  Renais- 
sance, but  so  strongly  influenced  by  the 
restraint  of  the  choir  stalls  as  to  harmon- 
ize with  them  almost  as  perfectly  as  if 
they  were  the  work  of  the  same  carver. 
The  central  (priest's)  box  has  a  low  door 


292 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


ST.  MARTIN'S  CHURCH,  YPRES,  AS  IT  APPEARED  IN  1910. 


c^l^MpS 

V*  ,_jmr  L 

7T      J,i  UJ--  -4* 
k,    ,     -™  -J *-->^ 

V    ,,Myi-..,.r  f.p  •/',•-/, 


*     *? 

itti  "  — **        II  .    ij  <*7 

I    !   |; 


I 


THE  OLD  BISHOP'S  PALACE  AND  MONASTERY,  YPRES. 


ul 
U 

CL 
UJ 


oc 
V 


<£ 
Q. 


r 
h 
o 


PM 

o  3 
S  § 


Photograph  by 

Newspaper  Illustrations,  Ltd. 


RUINS  OF  THE  CLOTH  HALL  AND  HOTEL  DE 
VILLE,  TAKEN  FROM  THE  GRANDE  PLACE. 
ST.  MARTIN'S  CHURCH  IN  BACKGROUND. 


Photograph  by 

Newspaper  Illustrations,   Ltd. 


RUINS  OF  THE  BELFRY  OR  CENTRAL 
TOWER  OF  THE  CLOTH  HALL  ON  THE 
GRANDE  PLACE,  YPRES,  BELGIUM. 


296 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


CENTRAL    TOWER    OF    THE    CLOTH     HALL. ' 
YPRES,    BEFORE    BOMBARDMENT. 

to  it,  and  over  the  doorway  a  dove  is 
shown  descending,  emblematical  of  the 
Holy  Spirit. 

Another  notable  piece  of  furniture  was 
the  font,  with  its  cover,  all  of  cast  and 
hammered  brass,  generally  massive  in  de- 
sign but  with  delicately  executed 'figures, 
three  in  number,  acting  as  caryatid  sup- 
ports to  the  canopy  of  the  cover ;  which, 
however,  they  do  not  really  carry,  for  of 
course  the  cover  is  suspended  (from  an 
ugly  iron  swinging  bracket).  One  was 
consequently  tempted  to  criticize  the  de- 
sign as  conveying  a  wrong  impression. 

Close  to  the  font,  on  the  north  side  of 
the  church,  a  door  which  few  people  were 
permitted  to  pass  led  into  the  cloisters  of 
the  old  monastery,  utterly  neglected  for 
many  years  past,  forming  a  small  well 
between  the  church,  the  monastery,  and 
the  Bishop's  Palace.  On  the  north  side, 
where  the  cloister  walk  has  been  built 
over  at  a  much  later  date  with  ugly 
brickwork,  the  work  appears  to  be  con- 
temporary with  the  nave — that  is,  to 
belong  to  the  second  half  of  the  thir- 


teenth century;  but  the  eastern  walk  is 
flamboyant  in  character,  something  like 
200  years  later.  That  the  cloisters  were 
in  use  within  comparatively  modern 
times,  however,  was  indicated  by  the 
tracery  being  filled  with  commonplace 
glazing  in  wood  frames. 

Unoccupied,  bare  and  cheerless  as  were 
the  rooms  of  the  monastery,  their  close 
investigation  led  to  the  discovery  of  a 
magnificent  mediaeval,  steep-pitched, 
timber  roof,  which  it  was  possible  to 
photograph  above  the  level  of  the  tie 
beam  which  carried  the  attic  floor.  It 
will  be  noticed  that  a  secondary  tie-bearn, 
or  collar,  was  carried  on  the  extremities 
of  lower  principals,  aided  by  brackets, 
while  side  brackets  were  also  used, 
springing  from  the  same  lower  principals, 
to  carry  the  plates  (or  purlins).  These 
upper  principals  were  framed  into  the 
collars;  and  so  it  went  on,  till  the  ridge 
was  reached.  The  position  of  the  scarf 
in  the  purlin  was  worth  noting,  and  alto- 
gether the  construction  deserved  consid- 
eration, if  only  for  curiosity  in  an  age 
when  such  roofs  would  scarcely  be  re- 
peated. 

It  was  altogether  exceedingly  difficult 
to  disentangle  this  group  of  buildings, 
which  formed  a  picturesque  medley  of 
roofs,  chimneys  and  turrets  when  seen 
from  outside,  butting  up  against  St.  Mar- 
tin's tower,  but  at  one  time  the  Abbey  of 
St.  Martin,  founded  by  Pope  Pascal  II 
in  1 102,  stood  upon  the  site.  It  belonged 
to  the  Canons  Regular  of  St.  Augustine, 


VAULTED  MARKET  UNDER  THE  CLOTH 
HALL,   YPRES. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


297 


ROOF   or  me  CLOTH 

YPRE5 


DETAILS  FROM  THE  ROOF  OF  THE  CLOTH  HALL  AT  YPRES. 


but  where  it  commenced  or  ended,  where 
the  Bishop's  Palace  came  in,  or  where 
"Poor  Clares  Convent"  stood  (also  men- 
tioned in  connection  with  the  same  site) 
it  would  be  difficult  to  say.  Possibly  the 
same  area  was  devoted  to  several  uses 
at  different  times. 

Externally  the  tower  of  St.  Martin's, 
an  exceedingly  fine  piece  of  work  of  it- 
self, was  out  of  proportion  with  the  rest 
of  the  church,  for  it  was  centrally  placed 
at  the  west  end  and  so  wide  as  to  en- 
compass the  'whole  width  of  the  nave. 
Logically,  in  an  architectural  sense,  this 
is  right,  for  a  fitting  termination  for  the 
nave  is  produced,  but  it  takes  a  very  long 
church  to  carry  such  a  mass  as  results  at 
its  extremity  with  any  sense  of  fitness, 
even  when,  as  in  this  case,  much  is  done 
to  lighten  the  effect  by  introducing  tra- 
cery in  the  upper  stages.  There  is  also 
difficulty  in  introducing  a  commensur- 
ately  sufficient  doorway  for  a  great 
church  within  the  restrictive  limits  of  a 
tower  without  apparently  weakening  its 
supports.  This  has  been  very  well  done 


indeed  at  St.  Martin's,  the  necessary  ef- 
fect of  strength  not  even  being  dimin- 
ished by  the  introduction  of  a  traceried 
window  within  the  great  enclosing  arch 
of  the  doorway,  and  above  the  heads  of 
the  actual  doors  themselves,  in  place  of 
the  usual  sculptured  stone  tympanum — 
treatment  which,  elsewhere,  was  only  to 
be  found  at  Reims. 

The  sketch  of  the  east  end  indicates 
how  admirably  St.  Martin's  grouped  with 
the  Cloth  Hall  from  this  side,  as  well  as 
from  the  Grande  Place;  yet,  though 
erected  at  very  much  the  same  time,  they 
were  totally  different  buildings  in  archi- 
tectural spirit  as  in  use. 

The  Cloth  Hall  was  commenced  in  the 
year  1200,  when  Baldwin  of  Constanti- 
nople was  Count  of  Flanders,  the  first 
portion  to  be  taken  in  hand  being  the 
central  tower,  or  belfry,  and  the  eastern 
wing,  extending  from  it  to  the  Grande 
Place.  This  was  finished  in  1230  and 
the  work  was  not  resumed  till  1285,  when 
the  similar  western  wing  was  added,  then 
turned  northwards  and  then  eastwards 


298 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


ROOF  OF  THE  MONASTERY.  YPRES. 

again,  all  in  accordance  with  the  original 
design  and  forming  the  letter  J  on  plan, 
the  whole  being  brought  to  conclusion 
in  1304,  rather  more  than  a  hundred 
years  from  the  start.  For  simplicity  and 
directness  of  design  no  mediaeval  build- 
ing could  compare  with  it,  perfect  in  bal- 
ance, well  proportioned,  admirably  held 
together  and  beautifully  detaile*d.  On 
the  ground  floor  an  arched  passageway 
passed  through  the  central  tower  while 
a  large  covered  market  extended  along 
either  wing,  reached  by  numerous  square- 
headed  doors  directly  from  the  road  and 
lighted  by  small  traceried  windows  over 
them — the  square  tower  openings  going 
far  to  give  an  appearance  of  substantial 
strength  to  the  whole  building. 

This  market,  with  its  curious  groined 
vaulting  of  small  bricks,  supported  by  a 
row  of  octagonal  pillars  down  the  center, 
was -unique. 

The  arcades  on  the  upper  floor,  while 
appearing  superficially  to  consist  of  a 
range  of  similar  and  evenly  spaced  win- 
dows, were  alternately  of  glazed  and  of 
blind  tracery,  the  "lights"  in  the  blind 
arches  being  filled  with  statuary  of  high 
order ;  and  a  crenellated  parapet  fringed 


the  eaves,  breaking  the  harshness  of  the 
horizontal  line  without  destroying  its 
character. 

Internally,  the  whole  of  the  upper  floor 
forms  one  huge  room  which,  in  addition 
to  two  returns,  was  no  le.ss  than  433  feet 
long,  though  only  38  feet  wide ;  redeemed 
from  being  too  greatly  extended  in  ap- 
pearance by  the  rising  of  the  tower 
arches  across  the  centre,  and  by  the 
grand  open  timber  roof,  in  construction 
not  entirely  unlike  that  to  the  monastery, 
already  described.  It  was,  however,  bo^i 
richer  and  larger,  as  will  be  seen  by  the 
sketch  section,  while  it  possessed  a  most 
exceptional  feature  in  the  form  of  a 
trussed  support  to  the  ridge,  like  a  double 
trellis  girder  in  timber,  which  extended 
the  whole  length  of  the  building,  binding 
it  longitudinally  though  greatly  adding 
to  the  weight.  The  scantlings  of  the  oak 
tie-beams,  18  in.  x  15  in.,  with  a  span  of 
nearly  38  feet,  will  be  noticed;  and  so 
will  the  fourteenth  century  character  of 
the  mouldings  wrought  upon  them  at 
their  junction  with  the  brackets,  though 
the  Renaissance  carving  at  the  foot  of 
some  of  the  wall  pieces,  bearing  date  of 
the  period  of  the  Spanish  occupation  of 
the  country,  may  indicate  that  repairs 
were  undertaken  then  or  possibly  more 


LA   CONCIERGERIE,  YPRES. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


299 


likely  that  a  carver  at  that  time  set  him- 
self to  enrich  the  older  work. 

It  is  a  wonderful  indication  of  the 
trade  of  Ypres  that  such  an  enormous 
room  should  have  been  needed  for  the 
annual  cloth  fair  in  the  early  part  of  the 
fourteenth  century. 

The  Nieuwercke,  or  Hotel  de  Ville, 
containing  the  .  municipal  offices,  which 
stood  at  the  east  end  of  the  Cloth  Hall, 
facing  the  Grande  Place,  was  built  about 
1620,  it  is  supposed  from  plans  made  in 
1575  by  John  Sporemah,  an  architect  of 
Ghent.  At  any  rate  it  was  in  the  style  of 
the  Spanish  Renaissance,  light  and  pic- 
turesque enough,  and  an  excellent  foil  to 
the  severe  Cloth  Hall,  but  far  from  good 
in  detail. 

There  must  •  have  been  '  much  small 
building,  or  at  any  rate  of  reparation 
work  done  at  Ypres  at  about  that  date, 
for  many  an  older  front  of  cut  brick- 
work, with  four  centred  pointed  arches 
to  the  window  heads  and  stepped  gables 
with  curiously  twisted  finials,  has  had  in- 
.troduced  into  it  somewhere  a  rectangular 
Renaissance  window,  often  displaying 
the  shell  ornament  conspicuously  and 
with  hopeless  lack  of  any  sense  of  bal- 
ance. 

Ypres  has  now  fallen  from  its  high 
estate  and  this  sort  of  thing  was  only  to 
be  expected.  It  had  received  its  first 
serious  blow  in  1383  when  it  was  be- 
sieged by  English  troops  acting  in  con-, 
cert  with  the  men  of  Ghent,  the  whole  of 
the  populous  suburbs  being  destroyed. 
The  cloth  trade  declined ;  it  ceased  to  be 
the  commercial  metropolis  of  Flanders, 
but  for  the  whole  of  another  hundred 
years  and  longer  it  still  remained  a  place 
of  consequence.  Then  came  the  troubles 
of  the  Spanish  occupation  and  it  was 
sacked  in  1566,  1578  and  again  in  1584, 
being  reduced  to  a  community  of  5,000 
souls.  Then  for  two  whole  centuries  it 
figured  constantly  in  history  as  the  scene' 
of  sieges,  bombardments  and  captures, 
followed  invariably  by  pillage  and  ruin- 
ous taxation,  so  that  the  wonder  is  that 
anything  remained  of  its  ancient  glories. 
Yet,  till  quite  recently,  a  fourteenth  cen- 
tury timber  house  was  standing,  while 
the  front  of  another  had  been  re-erected 
within  the  great  room  of  the  Cloth  Hall ; 
and  twisted  gables,  in  wood  and  plaster, 


of  the  time  of  the  Spaniards,  contempor- 
aneous with  the  English  Elizabethan 
work  and  somewhat  similar  thereto,  were 
not  uncommon,  as  exemplified  in  the 
house  known  as  the  Conciergerie. 

Another  significant  record  of  that  im- 
portant epoch  existed  at  Ypres,  and  may 


SHOP  FRONT  OF  CUT  BRICKWORK,  YPRES. 

possibly  still  be  there,  in  the  Museum. 
Philip  II  of  Spain,  launching  his  Ar- 
mada against  England  and  claiming  the 
English  throne  from  Queen  Elizabeth  as 
the  husband  oi  her  predecessor,  Mary, 
whom  he  had  married  as  a  child,  had 
taken  his  bride's  wedding  chest  to  Flan- 
ders, ready  for  transport  across  the  nar- 
row seas  as  soon  as  his  Armada  should 
succeed.  It  failed,  as  all  know,  and  the 
chest  remained  in  Flanders  and  found  its 
way  to  the  Museum  at  Ypres. 

Again  Ypres  has  suffered  devastation, 
more  complete  than  any  in  its  history  of 
trouble,  except  that  it  has  not  actually 
been  occupied  by  enemies ;  and  some  day 
we  may  confidently  hope  that  it  may  rise 
again  to  at  least  a  reasonable  prosperity 
and  accompanying  architectural  import- 
ance. 


ANTIQUE  URN-GARDEN  OF  RUSSELL  A. 
ALGER,   JR.,    ESQ.,   DETROIT.   MICHIGAN. 


PERGOLA— GARDEN  OF  CHARLES  W.  HUBBARD,   ESQ.,  WESTON,   MASS. 
Olmsted  Brothers,  Landscape  Architects. 


RECENT  ASPECTS  y  GARDEN  DES1CN 

BY  HAROLD-D  EBERLEIN 


FROM  a  critical  examination  of  the 
results  of  modern  garden  design 
may  be  learned  many  a  valuable 
lesson.  What  is  of  greater  and  more 
specific  import,  if  we  are  alert  to  apply 
the  principles  to  be  deduced  from  such 
a  discriminating  survey  of  the  subject, 
we  can  scarcely  fail  to  arrive  at  an  at- 
titude that  may  readily  be  translated, 
through  well  considered  choice,  into 
wisely  constructive  action. 

Garden  planning  is  both  an  art  and  a 
science  and  has  ever  been  regarded  by 
the  more  thoughtful  as  a  worthy  object 
of  serious  and  sober  endeavor.  As  such 
it  is  based  on  certain  fundamental  prin- 
ciples and  it  is  absolutely  essential  that 
these  principles  be  kept  always  in  mind 
as  a  safeguard  and  check  to  ensure  san- 
ity of  design  and  execution.  No  more 
illuminating  instances  of  the  application 


of  these  principles  can  be  adduced  than 
the  work  accomplished  within  several 
decades  past  by  the  foremost  designers 
of  gardens  in  America.  At  the  same 
time,  it  will  be  well  to  direct  attention 
to  certain  aspects  of  garden  design  both 
past  and  present  in  England,  whence 
so  many  of  our  own  garden  traditions 
are  derived,  and  afford  grounds  of  com- 
parison with  the  best  of  contemporary 
British  achievement. 

To  understand  the  rationale  of  gar- 
den making,  it  is  necessary  at  the  very 
outset  to  recognize  the  two  elemental 
purposes  for  which  gardens  were  first 
made  and  for  the  fulfillment  of  one  or 
the  other  or  both  of  which  they  are  still 
contrived.  Those  two  elemental  pur- 
poses are  utility  on  the  one  hand  and 
pleasure  or  adornment  on  the  other.  We 
must  keep  account  of  both  if  we  would 


302 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


follow  intelligently  the  development  of 
garden  planning  and  fully  appreciate 
modern  aims  and  performances,  in  the 
light  of  history,  as  the  results  of  an  or- 
derly evolution  from  worthy  antecedents. 
The  ancestor  of  our  modern  garden  was 
designed  in  its  "utility"  capacity  as  a 
proper  place  for  the  cultivation  of  fruits, 
the  raising  of  vegetables  requiring  pro- 
tection and  careful  culture,  such  as  were 
not  wont  to  be  sown  in  bulk  as  field 
crops,  and  the  growing  of  sundry  herbs 
and  simples.  In  other  words,  the  gar- 
den in  its  utility  capacity  was  a  kitchen 
garden.  In  its  capacity  as  a  place  for 
pleasure,  adornment,  outdoor  relaxation 
and  the  raising  of  plants  and  flowers  for 
the  gratification  to  be  gained  from  their 
beauty  or  perfume,  the  ancestor  of  the 
modern  garden  was  also  a  highly  im- 
portant ins'titution.  Indeed,  "in  Tudor 
and  Stuart  days  people  were  accus- 
tomed to  spend  a  great  deal  more  time 
in  their  gardens  than  did  succeeding  gen- 
erations and  it  is  only  within  recent  years 
that  we  have  regained  an  equal  love  and 
practice  of  garden  life.  How  fully  some 
of  our  forebears  used  their  gardens  may 
be  gathered  from  what  we  read  of  Sir 
Thomas  More's  garden  in  Southwark, 
where,  on  Sunday  afternoons,  were  wont 
to  gather  and  walk  to  and  fro,  notable 
persons  come  to  see  the  greatXord  Chan- 
cellor, along  with  belles  and  beaux  ar- 
rayed in  brave  attire,  to  listen  to  the 
music  and  see  the  strange  animals  and 
birds,  of  which  Sir  Thomas  had  a  small 
menagerie,  being  the  gifts  of  mariners 
and  travellers  from  far  distant  lands. 
Other  historic  gardens  were  nearly  as 
famous  and  quite  as  fully  used  as  that 
of  the  author  of  "Utopia." 

The  dual  functions  of  the  garden  for 
utility  and  pleasure  were  closely  blended 
in  a  way  that  may  seem  a  trifle  incon- 
gruous to  some  of  us.  In  many  in- 
stances it  would  be  hard  to  say  just 
where  the  boundary  line  was  to  be  drawn. 
The  growing  of  simples  seems  to  have 
formed  a  kind  of  connecting  link,  for 
at  one  time  it  was  the  custom  to  culti- 
vate various  plants  for  their  medicinal 
or  domestically  utilitarian  properties 
which  we  now  raise  merely  for  their 
decorative  value.  Among  such,  by  way 


of  example,  may  be  mentioned  digitalis 
and  the  marigold,  the  dried  petals  of  the 
latter  being  used  both  to  make  a  dye  and 
as  a  flavor  and  coloring  matter  for  soup. 
In  whatever  way  the  prosaic  and  orna- 
mental functions  of  the  garden  may 
originally  have  been  joined,  the  com- 
plete union  was  to  be  found  in  old 
English  and  Dutch  cottage  gardens  and 
also  in  some  gardens  of  greater  extent 
and  pretense  where  fruits  and  shrubs, 
vegetables  and  flowers,  were  grows  to- 
gether in  a  kind  of  promiscuous  democ- 
racy. However  crude  their  method  may 
have  been,  the  makers  of  those  humble 
gardens  were  trying  to  express,  a  right 
principle.  They  were  trying  to  realize, 
albeit  unconsciously,  the  old  Greek  ideal 
of  making  the  useful  beautiful  and,  con- 
versely, the  beautiful  useful,  according 
to  the  utilitarian  and  somewhat  material 
modern  standard.  We  find  this  same 
combination,  this  sarrie  intimate  connec- 
tion between  kitchen  garden  and  flower 
garden,  existing  in  many  of  the  finest  of 
our  early  American  gardens.  An  in- 
stance of  it  occurs  at  Ury  House,  Fox 
Chase,  Philadelphia,  a  part  of  whose  fa- 
mous old  box  garden  is  shown  in  one 
of  the  accompanying  illustrations.  The 
vegetable  garden  with  its  beds  edged  with 
box  of  nearly  two  centuries'  growth,  is 
just  across  a  box-bordered,  trellised 
walk  from  the  flower  garden,  laid  out 
in  all  the  old-fashioned  glory  of  geo- 
metrical devices.  This  principle  of  ren- 
dering the  homely  vegetable  patch  seemly, 
attractive  and  dignified  by  an  accompani- 
ment of  flowers,  fruit  bushes  and  shrubs 
commingled  with  its  beds  is  strongly  re- 
asserting itself  in  modern  garden  plan- 
ning. It  is  extremely  narrow  minded 
to  look  with  despite  upon  a  vegetable  be- 
cause it  is  not  a  flower  and  condemn  it 
to  a  hideous  and  shabby  setting.  The 
modern  garden  designer  is  keenly  alive 
to  this  feature  and  devotes  much  in- 
genious effort  to  making  the  kitchen  gar- 
den a  help  rather  than  a  hindrance  to 
the  general  scheme.  He  masks,  by  judi- 
cious planting  within  its  limits,  the  un- 
avoidable scars  and  unsightliness  incident 
to  certain  stages  of  vegetable-growing. 
Were  this  principle  not  being  so  strongly 
reasserted  that  it  demands  cognizance. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


303 


ANTIQUE  GARDEN  FURNITURE-GARDEN  OF  HAROLD  McCORMICK,  ESQ.,  LAKE  FOREST,  ILL. 

Charles  A.  Platt,  Architect. 


PERGOLA-GARDEN  OF  WILLIAM  MATHER,   ESQ.,  CLEVELAND,  OHIO. 
Charles  A.  Platt,  Architect. 


304 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD 


the  foregoing  paragraph  would  have 
merely  antiquarian  interest  and  be  de- 
void of  any  particular  application. 

In  yet  another  point  a  number  of  mod- 
ern gardens  show  a  reversion  to  an  an- 
cient precedent  and  hark  back  k>r  in- 
spiration to  an  almost  forgotten  custom, 
and  people  hail  with  admiration  and  de- 
light what  they  deem  an  agreeable  nov- 
elty. Reference  has  been  made  to  the 
small  menagerie  in  Sir  Thomas  More's 
garden.  In  other  private  gardens,  too, 
both  in  England  and  on  the  Continent, 
it  was  not  an  unusual  thing  to  find  oc- 
casional collections  of  rare  birds  or  small 
animals.  The  custom,  however,  seems 
to  have  almost  died  out  and  been  well 
nigh  forgotten.  Now  it  has  been  revived 
again  and  the  maintenance  of  an  aviary 
of  rare  and  curious  birds  has  been  made 
a  feature  '  of  both  permanent  interest 
and  decorative  value  in  one  of  the  gar- 
dens illustrated,  that  at  Doylestown, 
Bucks,  Pennsylvania.  Although  the  open 
air  aviary  is  not  shown,  it  occupies  a 
conspicuous  place  all  along  one  side  of 
the  garden.  Another  modern  garden  in 
which  the  keeping  of  exotic  birds  is  made 
an  important  feature  of  interest  is  that  of 
Mr.  Mellen  at  Stockbridge,  Massachu- 
setts. Other  instances  might  be  added, 
but  the  two  already  mentioned  are  suffi- 
cient to  indicate  a  modern  "trend  in  gar- 
den arrangement  derived  from  ancient 
precedent. 

In  the  gardens  selected  for  the  illus- 
tration of  the  present  article  are  to  be 
noted  two  distinct  tendencies  which  are 
highly  significant  and  indicative  of  op- 
posed present-day  ideals  of  garden  mak- 
ing. In  the  instances  before  us  neither 
tendency  is  carried  to  an  extreme  and, 
in  some  cases,  notwithstanding  the  dis- 
similarity of  the  several  underlying  con- 
ceptions, we  may  discern  certain  de- 
vices and  methods  of  treatment  common 
to  both  schools  of  design.  The  two  ten- 
dencies referred  to  are,  on  the  one  hand, 
the  obvious  intent  to  impart  an  intimate 
and  even  personal  character  to  the  gar- 
den, stamping  it  unmistakably  as  a  place 
created  for  comfort,  privacy  and  domes- 
tic informality,  while,  on  the  other,  the 
purposes  of  formal  or  semi-formal  and 
wholly  impersonal  environment  or  set- 


ting for  the  house  have  been  the  chief 
factors  in  determining  the  arrangement. 
As  fairly  representative  examples  of  the 
former  category,  that  is  to  say,  the  gar- 
dens whose  intimate  character  supplies 
their  dominant  note,  one  may  refer  es- 
pecially to  the  walled  garden  at  Doyles- 
town, and  the  garden  of  Charles  W.  Hub- 
bard,  Esq.,  at  Weston,  Massachusetts, 
executed  by  Olmsted  Brothers.  As  typical 
of  a  somewhat  more  formal  and  preten- 
tious style  of  garden  planning,  designed 
as  an  accompaniment  to  the  house  or  a 
setting  to  display  it  to  advantage  rather 
than  as  an  adjunct  for  the  intimate 
daily  pleasure  and  protected  occupancy 
of  the  people  who  live  in  the  house,  we 
may  examine  the  garden  of  Samuel  Vau- 
clain,  Esq.,  at  Rosemont,  Pennsylvania, 
by  Messrs.  Duhring,  Okie  and  Ziegler,  or 
the  garden  by  Olmsted  Brothers,  illus- 
trated on  p.  309.-  The  intimate  type  of 
garden  seems  to  be  gaining  more  and 
more  popular  favor  as  American  garden 
ideals  tend  to  coincide  more  fully  with 
the  conception  on  which  it  is  based.  The 
majority  of  garden  owners  are  happily 
getting  beyond  the  stage  where  they  de- 
sire gardens  planned  to  impress  the  ap- 
proaching stranger  by  their  starched, 
smug,  symmetrical  ostentation.  At  the 
same  time,  while  the  garden  of  the  inti- 
mate type  is  strongly  expressive  of  the 
best  traditions  of  American  life  by  its 
well-bred  informality,  it  makes  use  of 
not  a  few  material  accessories  of  the 
distinctly  formal  garden  and  in  this  em- 
ployment of  the  same  means  lies  the 
common  ground  of  both  types.  The  in- 
timate garden,  however,  uses  both  archi- 
tectural and  furnishing  accessories  in  an 
easy  and  informal  way. 

The  manner  of  treating  the  garden  plan 
depends  upon  the  conception  of  what  a 
garden  is  and  of  the  purpose  for  which  it 
exists.  Opinions  upon  this  point  will  in- 
evitably differ  among  different  individu- 
als, but  the  general  trend  of  sentiment, 
put  into  specific  words,  indicates  that 
the  garden  of  the  average  house  is  to  be 
regarded  as  a  necessary  adjunct  to  the 
structure  to  give  it  a  proper  setting  and 
display  its  architectural  worth  to  advan- 
tage, a  spot  set  apart  for  the  enjoyment 
of  the  air  and  the  pleasures  of  norticul- 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


305 


PERGOLA— GARDEN  OF  CHARLES  W.  HUBBARD,  ESQ.,  WESTON,  MASS. 
Olmsted  Brothers,  Landscape  Architects. 


PERGOLA— GARDEN  OF  ARTHUR  CURTISS  JAMES,  ESQ.,  NEWPORT,  R.  I. 
Olmsted  Brothers,  Landscape  Architects. 


306 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


307 


308 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


ture,  a  middle  ground  between  the  dwell- 
ing and  the  outside  world,  a  guaranty  of 
privacy  and  protection.  From  the  ety- 
mology of  the  word,  "garden"  denotes  an 
enclosure  and  implies  the  presence  of  a 
wall  or  some  protecting  barrier.  Further- 
more, history  shows  an  inseparable  as- 
sociation between  this  enclosure  and  the 
cultivation  of  vegetables,  fruits  or  flow- 
ers. As  the  very  basic  idea  of  a  garden, 
therefore,  presupposes  cultivation  and 
fostering  care,  it  can  readily  be  seen  that 
the  evidences  of  human  artifice  therein 
are  unavoidable,  that  it  would  be  impos- 
sible to  crowd  rustic  landscape  effects 
within  a  restricted  compass  and  that  the 
attempt  to  do  so  could  only  be  ludicrous. 
Artifice,  then,  and  at  least  some  measure 
of  formality,  however  slight,  being  in- 
volved in  the  creation  of  a  garden,  it  is 
eminently  fitting  and  reasonable  that  an 
architectural  element  should  be  employed 
to  supply  the  formal  frame  or  back- 
ground desired  and  strengthen  the  tone 
of  unity  binding  garden  and  house  to- 
gether. The  extent  to  which  architectural 
gardens  and  parks  must  be  kept  separate 
will  be  governed  by  the  exigencies  of  each 
case  and  the  architectural  tone  of  the 
garden  will  naturally  be  kept  consonant 
with  that  of  the  house.  Not  only  is  it 
interesting  to  note  the  success  realized  in 
the  treatment  of  many  gardens  where 
some  measure  of  formality,  in  the  shape 
of  architectural  adjuncts,  has  been  com- 
bined with  a  thoroughly  informal  scheme 
of  planting,  but  it  is  also  instructive  to 
mark  the  reserve  and  restraint  practiced 
in  using  only  so  much  architectural  equip- 
ment as  the  occasion  requires  for  prac- 
tical ends  and  no  more.  In  this  modera- 
tion lies  the  cause  of  the  combination's 
agreeable  result,  and  it  is  often  astonish- 
ing to  see  how  rich  a  variety  of  effects 
can  be  attained  by  employing  only  a  lim- 
ited number  of  features.  The  accom- 
panying illustrations  show  how  success- 
fully sundry  architectural  devices  have 
been  used  in  gardens  of  distinctly  inti- 
mate and  unostentatious  type.  We  need 
only  point  to  the  delightful  arrangement 
of  the  gazebo  or  tea-house,  of  which  sev- 
eral views  are  given,  in  Mr.  Hubbard's 
garden  at  Weston,  the  interesting  treat- 
ment of  the  walled  pergola  and  court  in 


the  same  garden  or  the  telling  touch 
added  by  the  dovecote  in  Mrs.  Riddle's 
garden  at  Glen  Riddle,  Pennsylvania,  a 
creditable  piece  of  garden  designing  exe- 
cuted by  Messrs.  Duhring  and  Howe. 

Allusion  has  been  made  to  the  concep- 
tion of  a  garden  as  a  place  of  privacy. 
In  this  view  of  the  garden,  making  it 
virtually  an  out-of-doors  extension  of  the 
house,  we  are  rapidly  coming  to  coincide 
with  our  British  contemporaries,  to  whom 
the  bold  publicity  of  so  many  Ameri- 
can gardens  is  utterly  abhorrent.  If  there 
is  to  be  any  real  privacy,  the  garden  en- 
closure must  be  of  such  character  that  it 
will  be  a  protection.  It  must  either  be 
an  exceedingly  thick  hedge  or  a  wall  and 
of  a  suitable  height.  A  wall  to  enclose 
a  garden,  either  wholly  or  in  part,  em- 
phasizes the  architectural  bond  of  re- 
lationship with  the  house  more  strongly, 
perhaps,  than  'any  other  one  feature.  At 
the  same  time,  it  affords  numerous  and 
varied  opportunities  for  interesting  treat; 
ment,  as  the  reader  may  judge  from  the 
illustrations  of  the  walled  gardens  at 
Doylestown  and  elsewhere.  When  the 
walls  are  not  given  .any  distinct  architect- 
urally decorative  value,  "planted"  or  es- 
paliered  for  fruit,  they  at  least  serve  the 
double  purposes  of  shelter  and  back- 
ground or  foil  for  the  blooms  and  foliage 
near  them.  If  the  walled  or  partly  walled 
or  semi-formal  garden  is  really  to  be  lived 
in  and  its  close  relationship  to  the  house 
bound  by  a  thousand  little  ties  of  human 
occupancy,  it  must  be  fitly  furnished  and 
equipped  for  comfort.  Otherwise  one 
might  as  well  camp  on  a  wide  stretch  of 
lawn  in  the  midst  of  great  plantations  of 
shrubbery,  groves  of  trees  and  all  the 
other  devices  of  the  landscape  engineer 
that  go  to  make  up  a  park,  but  have  no 
place  in  a  garden.  Man  naturally  seeks 
to  surround  himself  with  articles  of  com- 
fort and  pleasure  within  easy  reach  and 
their  presence  and  orderly  arrangement 
necessarily  create  at  least  some  slight 
measure  of  artifice  and  formality.  A 
garden,  properly  arranged  with  due  re- 
gard to  its  intimate  relationship  with  the 
house,  is  ready  for  use  by  the  occupants 
at  any  and  all  times  while,  to  use  a  land- 
scape, one  needs  to  prepare  a  picnic 
equipment.  One  of  our  chief  troubles  in 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


309 


WELL— GARDEN  OF  ARTHUR  CURTISS  JAMES,  ESQ.,  NEWPORT,   R.   I. 
Olmsted  Brothers,  Landscape  Architects. 


LONG  POOL— GARDEN  OF  ARTHUR  CURTISS  JAMES,  ESQ.,  NEWPORT,  R.  I. 
Olmsted  Brothers,  Landscape  Architects. 


310 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


POOL  AND  TEA  HOUSE— GARDEN  OF  SAMUEL  VAUCLAIN,   ESQ.,   ROSEMONT,   PA. 
Duhring,  Okie  &  Ziegler,  Architects. 


garden  planning  is  that  we  so  often  fail 
to  make  a  sufficient  distinction  between  a 
garden,  on  the  one  hand,  and  its  suit- 
ability for  intimate  use  in  connection  with 
the  house,  and  a  park,  on  the  other,  with 
its  landscape  features.  Consequently  we 
sometimes  try  to  have  landscapesque 
gardens  or  gardenesque  landscapes,  and 
the  combination  is  incongruous  and  un- 
successful. To  get  satisfactory  results 
gardens  and  parks  must  be  kept  separate 
in  execution  as  well  as  in  conception. 

In  all  the  phases  of  gardens  so  far 
noted,  whether  designed  for  utility,  pleas- 
ure, adornment  or  curious  interest,  one 
quality  may  be  clearly  discerned — ob- 
vious relationship  with  the  houses  to 
which  they  belong.  This  relationship  is 
far  stronger  than  it  is  between  some 
houses  of  earlier  date  and  their  gardens, 
when  pictorial  landscape  effects  were  in 
fashion  and  attempted  on  all  scales,  large 
and  small.  Before  all  else,  it  is  of  the 
last  importance  that  we  realize  fully  the 
fundamental  principle  of  relationship  that 
ought  to  exist  between  the  garden  and 
the  house.  It  is  only  when  this  relation- 


ship has  been  recognized  and  conscien- 
tiously honored  that  results  have  been 
successful.  English  gardens  laid  out  in 
recent  years  almost  invariably  show  a 
proper  and  logical  relation  to  the  houses 
they  surround,  and  in  that  particular  are 
deserving  of  special  study.  A  sense  of 
fitness  has  been  observed  in  their  design, 
and  from  the  resultant  quality  of  felicity 
we  may  derive  a  store  of  inspiration.  The 
success  of  a  garden  depends  almost 
wholly  upon  this  right  relation,  and  where 
it  is  absent,  no  matter  how  excellent  in- 
dividual parts  of  the  composition  may  be, 
the  effect  of  the  ensemble  is  bound  to  be 
disappointing  if  not  a  total  failure.  The 
intimate  relationship  between  the  house 
and  its  setting  exists  quite  independently 
of  the  consideration  of  natural  features 
or  the  lie  of  the  land.  It  consists  of  the 
degree  of  correspondence  maintained  be- 
tween the  modes  of  expression  made  use 
of  in  the  garden  and  in  the  scheme  of  the 
house  and  is  susceptible  of  indicating 
just  as  much  individuality  of  character 
as  does  the  fabric  of  the  structure  itself. 
Over  and  above  the  relationship  between 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


311 


DOVE   COTE— GARDEN   OF   MRS.    SAMUEL  D.    RIDDLE,    GLEN 

RIDDLE,   PA. 
Duhring  &  Howe,  Landscape  Architects. 


TERRACES-GARDEN  OF  MRS.  SAMUEL  D.  RIDDLE,  GLEN  RIDDLE,  PA. 
Duhring   &   Howe,   Landscape   Architects. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


313 


GRASS  WALK  AND  PLANTED  WALL— GARDEN  OF  DR.  GEORGE  WOODWARD,  KRISHEIM, 

ST.   MARTIN'S,    PHILADELPHIA. 

Olmsted    Brothers,    Landscape    Architects. 


PLANTED   WALL— GARDEN   OF  DR.   GEORGE   WOODWARD,   KRISHEIM,   ST.   MARTIN'S. 

PHILADELPHIA. 

Olmsted  Brothers,  Landscape  Architects. 


314 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


the  plan  of  the  garden  and  the  style  of 
the  house,  must  be  reckoned  the  inevitable 
relationship  between  the  garden  and  the 
natural  features  of  the  land  on  which  it 
is  laid  out.  The  preservation  and  due 
balancing  of  this  duality  of  relationships, 
while  furnishing  many  perplexing  prob- 
lems, also  afford  rare  opportunities  for 
the  display  of  originality  and  skill. 

The  secret  of  British  pre-eminent  suc- 
cess in  their  particular  method  of  dealing 
with  gardens  lies  largely  in  making  a 
judicious  combination  of  formal  and  in- 
formal elements.  Such  men  as  E.  T. 
Lutyens,  Sir  Robert  Lorimer,  Ernest 
Newton,  Reginald  Blorafield,  Guy  Daw- 
ber,  Blow  and  Billery,  E.  Turner  Powell 
and  a  number  of  others,  whose  names 
might  be  added  to  the  list,  have  been 
singularly  fortunate  in  giving  just  enough 
formal  or  architectural  treatment  as  a 
setting  for  gardens,  whose  general  com- 
position is  somewhat  informal  in  plan 
and  execution,  to  establish  firmly  the 
unity  of  the  garden  and  house  as  one  in- 
divisible whole.  Many  of  the  modern 
English  gardens  designed  by  the  more 
prominent  architects  might  be  character- 
ized as  examples  of  formality  in  an  ir- 
regular setting  or  informality  in  a  for- 
mal setting.  The  designers  have  not  only 
shown  a  conscientious  regard  »for  the 
basic  relation  of  garden  to  house,  but 
they  have  also  preserved  an  admirable 
degree  of  unity  and  consistency  in  the 
management  of  the  garden  itself.  They 
have  shown  a  sense  of  fitness  and  propor- 
tion and  have  not  introduced  irrelevant 
or  inappropriate  features.  If  a  balus- 
trade, a  flight  of  steps,  a  pool,  a  wall 
fountain,  a  gazebo,  a  leaden  figure,  a 
sundial,  a  terminal  bust,  or  any  one  of  a 
dozen  other  possibilities — all  savoring  in 
greater  or  less  degree  of  formality — be 
employed,  one  may  be  reasonably  sure 
that  there  is  some  logical  and  often  in- 
tensely practical  reason  for  having  them 
just  where  they  are  placed  and  that 
sooner  or  later  that  reason  will  become 
apparent.  We  find  the  same  discriminat- 
ing choice  and  judicious  arrangement  in 
many  of  our  recently  planned  American 
gardens  and  it  is  gratifying  to  note  that 
these  characteristics  are  becoming  more 
general  among  us. 


Sometimes  one  of  these  features  may 
be  used  to  emphasize  a  certain  desirable  . 
view  or  aspect — witness  the  low  enclos- 
ure and  the  tea-house  in  the  Hubbard 
garden — to  give  balance  or  accentuate 
proportion,  sometimes  the  motive  may  be 
to  subserve  the  demands  of  convenience 
and  sometimes,  we  shall  find,  the  purpose 
is  either  to  disguise  and  beautify  some 
object  which  it  is  neither  desirable  nor 
practicable  to  remove  or  to  overcome 
some  difficulty  presented  by  the  natural 
conditions  of  the  site.  Time  and  again 
necessity  has  been  made  a  virtue  in  this 
latter  respect  and,  in  considering  the 
natural  configuration  and  characteristics 
of  the  site  preparatory  to  beginning  oper- 
ations, a  large  measure  of  individuality 
has  often  been  secured  by  adapting  the 
plan  to  the  peculiarities  of  the  situation 
instead  of  sweeping  them  aside  at  great 
expense  and  much  labor  to  make  way  for 
a  scheme  of  tame  and  unconvincing  con- 
ventionality. We  may,  indeed,  say  that 
one  of  the  most  important  factors  that 
has  contributed  to  the  great  success  of 
the  more  recent  gardens  is  the  systematic 
practice  of  the  principle  of  congruity — in 
other  words,  this  very  method  of  study- 
ing conscientiously,  first  of  all,  the  natural 
conditions  of  the  ground,  the  lie  of  the 
land  and  the  exposure  and  then  making 
the  garden  plans  conform  as  nearly  as 
possible  to  the  requirements  thus  indi- 
cated without  attempting  drastic  altera- 
tions. 

It  would  seem  to  be  the  part  of  ordi- 
nary common  sense  to  cultivate  any 
natural  feature  which  imparts  strong  in- 
dividuality instead  of  endeavoring  to  de- 
stroy it  or  tone  it  down,  but  despite  the 
obvious  propriety  and  advantage  of  such 
a  course,  it  is  a  matter  of  almost  daily 
occurrence  to  see  the  policy  of  ruthless 
levelling  in  operation  with  its  inevitable 
destruction  of  rare  opportunities  for  the 
display  of  ingenuity  and  good  taste.  In 
their  delightful  book  on  gardens  for  small 
houses,  Mr.  Lawrence  Weaver  and  Miss 
Jekyll  pertinently  observe  that  if  the 
natural  features  of  a  garden-site  are  "em- 
phatic or  in  any  way  distinct,. they  should  • 
be  carefully  maintained  and  fostered.  It 
is  grievous  to  see,  in  a  place  that  has  some 
well-defined  natural  character,  that  char- 


POOL  AND  JETS— GARDEN  OF  DR.  GEORGE  WOOD- 
WARD, KRISHEIM,  ST.  MARTIN'S,  PHILADELPHIA. 
OLMSTED  BROTHERS,  LANDSCAPE  ARCHITECTS. 


316 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


acter  destroyed  or  stultified,  for  it  is  just 
that  quality  that  is  most  precious."  This 
side  of  garden-planning  is  one  of  the 
aspects  that  needs  most  encouragement 
and  development  among  us  in  America. 
By  following  intelligently  the  course  sug- 
gested by  nature  we  may  be  sure  of  ob- 
taining the  most  harmonious,  dignified 
and  enduringly  satisfactory  results.  In 
other  words,  if  nature's  fullest  help  is  to 
be  gained,  she  must  be  courted,  not 
bullied.  "Many  a  site,"  continue  the  au- 
thors just  quoted,  "has  been  vulgarized 
by  a  conventionally  commonplace  treat- 
ment," a  statement  with  which  most  read- 
ers familiar  with  the  situation  will  be 
disposed  to  agree. 

By  a  natural  sequence  of  thought,  one 
passes  from  considering  the  .plan  of  the 
garden,  with  reference  to  the  natural 
features  of  the  site,  to  considering  the 
placing  of  the  house  itself  with  refer- 
ence coincidentally  to  the  site  and  to  the 
scheme  of  the  garden.  In  this  matter 
too  many  of  us  are  slaves  of  habit.  It 
cannot  be  denied  that  we  have  an  un- 
fortunate obsession  for  placing  the  house 
squarely  in  the  middle  of  the  property, 
no  matter  what  the  exposure,  no  mat- 
ter what  the  outlook,  no  matter  what 
the  lie  of  the  land.  We  are  still  in  the 
toils  of  an  odious  thraldom  to  the  sense- 
less mid-Victorian  convention  of  having 
a  "front  approach."  A  few  bold  spirits 
— the  time  is.  coming  when  more  will 
show  the  same  laudable  daring — have 
disregarded  meaningless  conventions  and 
put  the  backs  of  their  houses  directly 
upon  the  road,  or  at  the  very  corner  of 
their  lot,  if  it  suited  their  purpose  to  do 
so  and  gave  them  a  better  chance  of 
making  their  garden  a  success.  This  is 
exactly  what  some  of  the  most  success- 
ful English  architects,  like  Mr.  Lutyens, 
have  done  time  and  again  and  the  re- 
sults have  thoroughly  justified  their  de- 
fiance of  baseless  traditions.  It  is  only 
by  showing  a  proper  consideration  for 
the  natural  features  of  the  location  in 
such  cases  that  we  shall  arrive  at  a  sat- 
isfactory solution.  It  may  be  well  enough 
to  dress  for  others,  but  certainly  one's 
house  ought  to  be  built  primarily  for 
one's  own  satisfaction  and  not  for  the 
commendation  of  an  unthinking  and  con- 


vention-ridden public.  In  this  connection 
it  will  not  be  amiss  to  suggest  the  pro- 
priety of  placing  a  house  on  the  boun- 
dary line  of  the  property  if  conditions 
call  for  it  so  that  the  garden  may  stretch 
away  to  the  south,  west  and  east  and 
have  the  exposure  most  favorable  to  its 
development. 

While  it  is  by  no  means  an  unusual 
thing  still  to  meet  with  gardens  made 
ostensibly  for  show  and  lacking  all  trace 
of  homelikeness,  gardens  perpetuating 
the  uninspired  fashion  of  twenty-five  or 
thirty  years  ago  and  only  one  degree  bet- 
ter than  the  depressing  "landscape"  lawns 
abounding  in  cast  iron  dogs  or  beasts  of 
the  chase,  passant,  couchant  or  regardant 
or  the  terra-cotta  representatives  of  the 
Greek  or  Roman  pantheon,  disposed  as 
agreeable  "surprises"  amid  island  clumps 
of  shrubbery  or  ranged  against  back- 
grounds of  obviously  artificial  "bosky 
tangle,"  gardens  arranged,  in  short,  with 
blatant  vulgarity,  "where  everything  that 
money  can  do  to  spoil  nature"  has  been 
done,  nevertheless,  the  general  tone  of 
garden  design  has  perceptibly  and  rapidly 
changed  for  the  better,  thanks  to  the 
wholesome  leaven  of  the  labors,  during 
the  past  two  decades,  of  such  men  as  the 
( Mmsteds,  among  landscape  gardeners, 
and,  among  architects,  Charles  A.  Platt, 
Wilson  Eyre,  Little  and  Browne,  Mc- 
Kim,  Mead  and  White  and  many  more 
who  have  conscientiously  stood  for  sound 
principles  until  the  present  average  ex- 
cellence of  garden-planning  has  come  to 
pass  and  popular  taste  has  been  tutored 
to  a  high  measure  of  appreciation.  Al- 
though the  work  of  each  man  bears,  in 
some  degree,  the  impress  of  his  person- 
ality, one  may  readily  recognize  the  pres- 
ence of  traits  common  to  all  of  them  and 
all  of  them  make  their  plans  with  due 
regard  to  the  comprehensive  analogy  be- 
tween architecture  and  gardening  mani- 
fested in  the  correspondences  between 
the  several  architectural  styles  and  con- 
temporary fashions  in  garden  design. 
Also,  in  nearly  all  of  the  better  work  we 
find  the  grateful  merit  of  simplicity. 

To  a  consistent  devotion. to  simplicity 
we  doubtless  owe  it  that  modern  ex- 
amples of  garden-planning  have  generally 
escaped  the  absurdities  of  formalism 


THE  ARCHITECTURAL  RECORD. 


317 


OLD  BOX  GARDEN— URY  HOUSE,  FOX  CHASE,  PHILADELPHIA. 


which  the  gardens  of  the  eighteenth  cen- 
tury so  often  fell  into,  absurdities  that 
Horace  Walpole  flayed  when  he  wrote 
of  "canals  measured  by  the  line,  .... 
terraces  hoisted  aloft,  ....  giants,  ani- 
mals, monsters,  coats  of  arms  and  mot- 
toes, in  yew,  box  and  holly"  and  added 
that  "the  compass  and  square  were  of 
more  use  in  plantations  than  the  nursery- 
man." Where  a  real .  formal  treatment 
has  been  adopted  it  has,  in  most. instances, 
been  characterized  by  a  reasonable  re- 
straint and  freedom  from  finicky  inani- 
ties. Whether  one  likes  formal  gardens 
or  not,  fairness  compels  the  admission 
that,  as  architectural  constructions  they 
often  possess  the  great  merit  of  consist- 
ency in  their  relation  to  houses  of  cer- 
tain types  whose  outlines  they  serve  to 
break  and  gradually  to  soften  and  that 
they  thus  form  an  agreeable  "connection 
with  the  irregular  and  unstudied  forms 
of  meadow  and  forest  beyond."  They 
are  often,  in  other  words,  connecting 
links  or  middle-grounds  between  houses 
and  the  landscape.  While  professedly 
formal  gardens  not  infrequently  occupy 
a  considerable  extent  of  ground  on  large 


estates,  it  often  happens  that  honors  are 
divided  and  the  formal  garden  limited  in 
space  so  that  more  space  may  be  given 
the  development  of  the  informal  garden. 
An  excellent  example  of  this  arrange- 
ment is  to  be  found  at  "Krisheim,"  St. 
Martin's,  Philadelphia,  illustrated  on  pp. 
313  and  315.  In  executing  this  garden 
the  Messrs.  Olmsted  have  confined  the 
formal  section  to  a  comparatively  limited 
area  adjacent  to  the  north  wing  of  the 
house  and  have  constructed  all  the  walls, 
terraces,  retaining  walls  and  other  archi- 
tectural features  of  the  native  Chestnut 
Hill  stone  so  that  both  material  and  tex- 
ture of  masonry  conform  to  that  em- 
ployed in  the  house. 

In  the  rest  of  the  estate,  which  is 
treated  informally,  the  designers  have 
followed  the  sound  principles  of  accept- 
ing natural  features  for  what  they  are 
worth  without  trying  to  change  them  by 
expensive  and  usually  ill-judged  altera- 
tions, of  using  the  native  material  ready 
at  hand  and,  finally,  of  using  native  trees 
and  shrubs,  getting  excellent  effects  with 
them  and  confining  such  exotics  as  may 
be  used  to  the  bounds  of  the  formal  gar- 


318 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


den.  Dogwoods  and  other  native  trees  of 
a  decorative  character  have  been  added 
in  the  thickets  and  the  open  hillside  has 
been  covered  with  a  tangle  of  sweet- 
briar  and  honeysuckle  where  it  would  be 
hopeless  to  have  presentable  grass.  The 
retaining  wall  has  been  built  "dry"  and 
planted  with  a  variety  of  rock  plants, 
some  of  which  are  in  bloom  most  of  the 
time.  The  practice  of  planting  "dry" 
rock  walls  has  become  exceedingly  popu- 
lar within  the  past  few  years  and  must 
be  reckoned  one  of  the  most  effective  de- 
vices of  modern  informal  gardening. 

At  this  point  it  will  be  appropriate  to 
call  attention  to  the  praiseworthy  prac- 
tice, all  the  time  gaining  in  popularity, 
of  procuring  some  object  or  group  of  ob- 
jects of  unusual  artistic  merit  and  mak- 
ing them  focal  points  of  interest  in  the 
formal  garden,  whether  it  be  small  and 
walled  and  intimate  in  character  like  the 
Doylestown  garden,  with  its  Florentine 
fountain,  Calabrian  oil  jar  and  decorative 
plaques  and  medallions  set  into  the  wall 
or  whether  it  be  open  and  extended  and 
meant  for  the  public  to  gaze  upon  like 
the  garden  shown  on  p.  309,  with  its 
flaring  well  kerb,  wrought  iron  cover  and 
four  exquisite  flanking  Venetian  col- 
umns with  ornate  capitals,  or  the  garden 
terrace  shown  on  p.  303,  with  its  ancient 
carved  marble  seats,  pedestals  and  jars. 

One  other  phase  of  the  modern  garden 
must  be  adverted  to — the  treatment  to  be 
accorded  to  the  small  plot  of  the  house  of 
modest  size  and  particularly  the  house 
of  either  Georgian  or  Colonial  type, 
which  enjoys  such  general  favor. 

A  degree  of  formality,  or  rather,  to 
be  strictly  accurate,  a  degree  of  artifi- 
ciality or  symmetry,  is  quite  compatible 
with  the  acceptable  treatment  of  a  small 
garden  and  it  was  such  formality,  tem- 
pered with  taste  and  common  sense,  that 
the  gardens  of  many  of  our  American 
Georgian  houses  displayed,  gardens  with 
gravel  paths  and  grass  alleys  laid  out 
with  mathematical  precision  in  geometri- 
cal patterns,  outlined  with  box  hedges 
or  shut  in  between  box-edged  flower  bor- 
ders in  which  old-fashioned  blooms, 
stately  and  humble  side  by  side,  crowded 
each  other  in  promiscuous  informality 
within  a  formal  setting.  Such  is  the 


box  garden  of  Ury  House,  Fox  Chase 
Philadelphia,  previously  alluded  to,  which 
has  been  the  pride  of  its  owners  for 
nearly  two  centuries.  Such  also  are 
many  other  modest  but  stately  Georgian 
gardens  in  our  older  Eastern  States,  cher- 
ished intact  by  their  owners  with  rever- 
ently punctilious  affection,  enduring  wit- 
nesses of  the  best  gardening  traditions  of 
the  eighteenth  century,  their  trim  exacti- 
tude marked  here  and  there  by  a  well- 
placed  marble  statue  or  classic  urn,  or, 
perhaps,  a  sun-dial  or  flight  of  balus- 
traded  steps — just  enough  evidences  of 
formality  to  preserve  the  tone  of  unity 
and  relationship  between  the  garden  and 
the  house  and  cement  the  correspondence 
between  the  urbane  atmosphere  of  one 
and  the  architectural  urbanity  of  the 
other. 

There  is  no  necessary  relationship  be- 
tween size  and  formality.  Many  a  small 
garden  is  successfully  formal  —  the 
American  Georgian  examples  prove  it — 
while  not  a  few  large  formal  gardens 
are  complete  failures.  A  small  garden, 
within  really  strait  limits,  may  be  rigidly 
formal  and  dignified  and  likewise  thor- 
oughly satisfying,  much  more  so,  in  fact, 
than  some  other  gardens  in  the  same 
vein  where  there  has  been  no  hampering 
limitation  of  space.  From  the  modest 
American  Georgian  gardens,  therefore, 
we  may  derive  not  a  little  present  inspira- 
tion and  learn  a  lesson  in  the  art  of  at- 
taining an  agreeable  unity  and  fit  rela- 
tionship between  the  structure  and  its 
immediate  setting.  In  view  of  our  pres- 
ent partiality  for  Georgian  domestic 
architecture  for  houses  both  large  and 
small  we  cannot  afford  to  overlook  the 
manner  and  plan  of  our  own  eighteenth 
century  horticultural  achievements,  es- 
pecially since  it  is  obvious  that  a  treat- 
ment in  some  later  fashion  would  have 
impaired  the  architectural  charm  of  the 
house  which  is  always  dependent  on  its 
immediate  environment  to  appear  to  the 
best  advantage.  In  instances  where  such 
later  gardening  fashions  have  replaced 
the  original  treatment,  the  result  has  not 
been  reassuring. 

Architects  are  coming  more  and  more 
to  include  a  scheme  for  the  garden,  along 
with  the  plan  of  the  house  and  outbuild- 


319 


WALLED  GARDEN— HOUSE  AT  DOYLESTOWN,  BUCKS,   PA. 


ings,  in  the  lay-out  of  the  property  pre- 
pared for  the  client,  no  matter  how  small 
the  property  may  be.  The  practice  is 
logical  and  sane  and  based  on  a  realiza- 
tion of  the  close  and  necessary  relation 
of  the  garden  to  the  house  and  their  de- 
pendence on  each  other  for  the  best  ef- 
fects of  which  each  is  capable.  Some- 
times the  garden  scheme  in  these  render- 
ings is  merely  a  rough,  tentative  sketch, 
at  others  it  is  worked  out  in  full  and  care- 
ful detail  so  that  little  is  needed  in  ad- 
dition from  which  to  direct  further  oper- 
ations. In  either  case,  and  whether  the 
architect  himself  supervises  all  the 
minutiae  of  garden-making  and  furnish- 
ing or  entrusts  them  to  a  landscape  en- 
gineer, the  growing  tendency  to  regard 
garden  and  house  as  one  composition  is 
full  of  promise  for  the  future.  One  thing, 
however,  must  be  kept  in  mind.  No  mat- 
ter how  skillfully  the  architect  may  de- 
sign the  garden,  no  matter  how  consci- 
entiously he  may  superintend  the  plant- 
ing— and  many  architects,  be  it  remem- 


bered, have  a  wide  knowledge  of  plants 
and  flowers  and  their  habits  and  colors — 
the  responsibility  for  the  ultimate  success 
and  lasting  charm  rests  upon  the  client. 
The  architect  may  supply  walls  and  steps, 
pools  and  fountains,  pergolas,  tea-houses, 
gazebos,  exedrae,  arbors  and  a  dozen 
other  devices,  but  unless  the  client  be- 
stows the  constant  and  devoted  attention 
upon  the  planting  which  the  intimate  na- 
ture of  the  garden  demands,  the  result 
will  not  be  happy.  A  garden  must  be 
coaxed,  humored  and  caressed,  not 
bullied  or  condemned  to  cold  neglect. 
There  are  clients,  as  architects  know  only 
too  well,  who  expect  to  have  a  garden 
planted  at  the  outset  and  then  be  kept 
running  with  a  minimum  of  attention 
from  a  hired  gardener.  Their  own  per- 
sonal interest  they  completely  withhold. 
Such  laissez-faire  gardening  can  never 
be  a  success  and  a  garden  subjected  to 
it  will  always  look  cold  and  starved  in 
spite  of  all  the  initial  efforts  of  the  archi- 
tect. 


MAIN  LOBBY,  LOOKING  TOWARD  OFFICE 
LOBBY-HOTEL  STATLER,  DETROIT,  MICH. 
GEO.  B.  POST  &  SONS,  ARCHITECTS. 


ASSEMBLY  HALL  AND  ELEVATOR  LOBBY. 


l^fie  Hotel  dtatfer  in  ^e  troit 

§e~°  B.  Post  &  Sons,   ~4rcfiit<2Qts 
W.  Sydney  Wagner 


THE  recent  opening  of  the  Hotel 
Statler  in  Detroit,  Michigan,  has 
given  that  city  a  hotel  notable  for 
modernity,  completeness  and  studied  ar- 
chitectural embellishment.  It  is  the  third 
and  largest  of  the  very  remarkable  ho- 
tels built,  owned  and  operated  by  the 
Hotels  Statler  Company,  and  is  the  sec- 
ond hotel  of  this  company  to  bear  the 
name  of  Geo.  B.  Post  and  Sons  as  archi- 
tects, the  first  being  the  Hotel  Statler  in 
Cleveland. 

To  those  specially  interested  in  hotel 
management  or  construction,  a  careful 
examination  of  the  illustrations  published 
herewith  will  reveal  an  unusual  number 
of  interesting  and  novel  features  for  effi- 
cient and  economical  service. 

Fronting  on  Grand  Circus  Park,  one 
of  the  most  beautiful  of  Detroit's  many 
parks,  and  bounded  on  one  side  by  Wash- 
ington Avenue  and  on  the  other  by  Bag- 
ley  Avenue,  the  segmental  shape  of  the 


site,  added  to  the  exacting  requirements 
of  modern  hotels  of  the  first  class,  has  re- 
sulted in  unique  features  of  plan  and  de- 
sign. 

The  building  is  sixteen  stories  in 
height  above  grade.  The  first  two  floors, 
each  of  which  is  mezzanined,  are  devoted 
to  the  large  public  rooms  and  entertain- 
ment suites  with  their  necessary  com- 
plement of  service  units  and  the  like. 
Above  these  are  eleven  guest  room  floors. 
Then  come  two  floors  devoted  to  sample 
display  rooms,  and  there  is  a  servants' 
dormitory  floor  immediately  under  the 
roof.  Below  grade  are  a  basement  and 
a  sub-basement,  containing  the  laundries, 
the  mechanical  plant,  store  rooms  and 
so  on. 

While  the  general  architectural  treat- 
ment of  the  exterior  has  followed  the 
lines  of  the  style  popularly  referred  to  as 
"Adam,"  it  has  been  largely  inspired  by 
the  Classical  and  the  Italian  Renaissance 


322 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


architecture  of  the  periods  beloved  by 
Piranesi,  and  from  which  the  brothers 
Adam  evolved  the  style  known  by  their 
name. 

The  two  lower  stories  are  of  buff  In- 
diana limestone  resting  on  a  base  of  gran- 
ite. The  limestone  ashlar  is  laid  up  in 
wide  horizontal  courses,  each  of  the 
courses  being  about  five  feet  in  height. 
Texture  and  contrast  are  obtained  by  the 
use  of  two-cut-to-the-inch  tooling  in  all 
of  the  large  stone  surfaces,  the  mouldings 
and  small  surfaces  being  rubbed.  The 
treatment  of  these  two  lower  stories  has 
been  kept  severe  and  simple,  the  large 
plain  wall  surfaces  displaying  to  the  best 
advantage  the  natural  beauty  of  the  lime- 
stone and  enhancing  the  stone  carving 
concentrated  in  the  panels  and  placques 
between  the  pilasters  of  the  second  story. 

The  shaft  of  the  building  is  of  an  in- 
expensive wire  cut  brick,  ranging  in  color 
from  red  almost  to  black,  and  laid  up 
with  a  three-quarter  inch  joint  of  grey 
mortar  in  English  cross  bond,  which  gives 
a  pleasing  yet  unobtrusive  diaper  pattern 
on  the  wall  surfaces. 

The  three  upper  stories  are  of  terra 
cotta  and  brick,  the  terra  cotta  matching 
the  limestone  of  the  lower  stories  both 
in  color  and  texture.  Here  again  the 
principal  architectural  motif  is  the 
Adamesque  placque  and  ornament  of 
terra  cotta  inlaid  in  the  brick  panels. 
The  cornice  above  is  entirely  of  terra 
cotta,  and  the  sky  line,  already  interesting 
on  account  of  the  unusual  shape  of  the 
building,  is  further  enhanced  by  the  light 
terra  cotta  balustrade  and  the  severely 
classical  urns  surmounting  it. 

An  interesting  and  successful  feature 
of  the  exterior  is  the  graduated  chamfer- 
ing of  the  corners  of  the  building  extend- 
ing through  the  entire  shaft.  This  gives 
to  the  mass  of  the  building  a  most  ap- 
preciable sense  of  stability  and  entasis 
without  the  necessity  of  using  the  expen- 
sive method  of  battering  back  the  entire 
surfaces  of  the  walls. 

In  approaching  the  question  of  the  plan 
of  this  hotel,  there  are  three  general  con- 
siderations which  must  be  borne  in  mind, 
and  which  will  be  found  to  govern  the 
disposition  of  practically  every  unit,  both 
public  and  service,  in  the  building;  and 


the  success  of  any  hotel  depends,  ulti- 
mately, upon  the  architects'  and  owners' 
thorough  understanding  of  these  consid- 
erations, and  upon  their  ability  to  use 
them  to  the  best  advantage  in  planning 
and  building:  First,  the  arrangement  of 
that  part  of  the  house  devoted  directly 
to  the  guest  in  such  manner  as  to  meet 
absolutely  every  reasonable  demand  of 
his  for  comfort  and  convenience;  sec- 
ond, the  entertainment  part  of  the  house, 
so  arranged  as  to  give  every  convenience 
for  handling  affairs  of  all  kinds  without 
interfering  with  the  comfort  of  the  guest, 
and  so  flexible  that  it  will  properly  ac- 
commodate the  largest  as  well  as  smallest 
function  ;  third,  the  location  and  arrange- 
ment of  the  service  department  of  the 
hotel  in  such  manner  that  the  service  to- 
all  parts  will  be  complete  and  direct,  and 
therefore  most  efficient  and  economical. 

To  these  considerations  it  may  be  well 
to  add  a  fourth,  that  of  economy  of  mate- 
rials and  construction.  This  is  such  an 
obvious  requirement  in  any  building  con- 
structed and  operated  by  the  owners  to 
return  a  fair  profit  upon  their  investment 
that  it  seems  hardly  necessary  to  mention 
it,  yet  it  is  a  consideration  of  prime  im- 
portance, one  that,  unfortunately,  seems 
to  be  only  too  often  disregarded. 

In  the  Hotel  Statler  the  utmost  econ- 
omy possible  without  detriment  to  the 
quality  or  completeness  of  the  work  was 
demanded,  and  in  consequence  the  de- 
sired architectural  effects  were  obtained 
by  the  careful  selection  and  use  of  inex- 
pensive materials,  combined  with  a  thor- 
ough study  of  proportion,  detail  and 
color. 

The  guest  arriving  at  the  hotel  enters 
the  main  lobby  at  either  end,  passing 
through  small  entrance  vestibules,  the 
walls  of  which  are  of  Botticino  marble 
inlaid  with  delicate  ornament  of  Port 
d'Or  marble.  The  main  lobby  is  an  im- 
posing room  forty-eight  feet  wide, 
ninety-two  feet  long  and  twenty-four 
r^et  high,  with  a  vaulted  ornamental 
plaster  ceiling.  The  walls  are  of  Bot- 
ticino marble  up  to  the  height  of  the  mez- 
zanine balcony,  which  extends  along  one 
side  of  the  room  as  well  as  around  the 
office  lobby.  The  ceiling  is  supported  on 
eight  panelled  marble  piers;  and  on  that 


THE   HOTEL   STATLER,   DETROIT,   MICH. 
GEO.     B.     POST     &    SONS.     ARCHITECTS. 


MEN'S  ENTRANCE-HOTEL  STAT- 
LER,  DETROIT,  MICH.  GEO.  B. 
POST  &  SONS,  ARCHITECTS. 


326 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


MEN'S  CAFE-HOTEL  STATLER,  DETROIT,  MICH. 
Gco.  B.  Post  &  Sons,  Architects. 


GROUND  FLOOR  PLAN— HOTEL  STATLER,  DETROIT,  MICH. 
Geo.  B.  Post  &  Sons,  Architects. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


327 


MEZZANINE   FLOOR  PLAN-HOTEL  STATLER,   DETROIT,   MICH. 
Geo.  B.  Post  &  Sons,  Architects. 


side  of  the  room  overlooking  Grand  Cir- 
cus Park  the  furniture  and  rugs  have 
been  so  arranged  between  these  piers  as 
to  afford  comfortable  lounging"  alcoves 
for  guests.  The  color  scheme  of  the 
hangings  and  furnishings  of  the  room  is 
gray  and  blue,  and  this  color  scheme  is 
recalled  also  in  the  decoration  of  the 
plaster  ceiling. 

Opening  from  the  main  lobby,  and 
similar  to  it  in  treatment  and  decorations, 
is  the  office  lobby,  containing  on  one  side 
the  hotel  office,  with  its  complete  equip- 
ment of  room  racks,  cashiers'  cages, 
safety  deposit  boxes  and  the  like,  and  on 
the  opposite  side  the  telegraph  office,  and 
the  cigar,  news,  and  souvenir  counters. 

Proceeding  from  the  office  lobby,  the 
guest  finds  himself  in  the  elevator  lobby, 
where  are  located  the  four  high-speed 
passenger  elevators,  the  check  room  and 


the  porters'  office.  A  special  men's  en- 
trance and  exit  for  the  convenience  of 
the  house  guests  is  provided  by  means  of 
a  third  doorway  to  Washington  Avenue. 

Opening  directly  from  the  elevator 
lobby  and  men's  entrance  are  the  main 
dining  room,  the  grill  room  and  the  men's 
cafe,  of  which  the  main  dining  room  and 
men's  cafe  are  in  direct  communication 
with  the  main  lobby. 

The  main  dining  room  faces  on  Bagley 
Avenue  and  has  a  flat  ornamental  plaster 
ceiling  and  plaster  walls  and  pilasters 
decorated  in  gray  and  green.  The  walls 
are  protected  by  a  low  wainscoting  of 
Botticino  marble.  This  room,  although 
large  in  size,  and  with  its  floor  space  un- 
obstructed by  columns,  has  been  so  dec- 
orated and  furnished  as  to  be  comfort- 
able and  informal.  There  is  none  of  the 
feeling  of  stiff  formality  which  chills  and 


330 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


— ™=x=a      rW'/j' 

,*„*«•»    •    —.V.          /.  « 


FIRST   FLOOR   PLAN-HOTEL  STATLER,   DETROIT.   MICH. 
Geo.  B.  Post  &  Sons,  Architects. 


repulses  the  average  guest  and  oppresses 
him  throughout  the  entire  meal. 

The  grill  room  and  the  men's  cafe  are 
both  in  that  style  of  architecture  which 
at  present  is  the  accepted  type  for  a 
''man's  room,"  the  Elizabethan,  with  its 
characteristic  antique  ornamental  plaster 
ceilings  and  with  walls  panelled  for  their 
full  height  in  quartered  oak.  The  carv- 
ing in  the  base  and  cornice  is  enriched 
by  the  introduction  of  ebony  inlay.  In 
the  richly  colored  window  draperies  and 
furniture  coverings,  in  the  deep-toned 
portraits  on  the  walls,  and  in  the  sparkle 
of  the  antique  silver  lighting  fixtures,  are 
found  those  notes  of  color  so  necessary 
to  the  proper  finish  of  a  room  of  this 
type. 

The  mezzanine  balcony,  which  over- 
looks both  the  main  lobby  and  the  office 
lobby,  provides  additional  lounging  space, 
and  is  connected  with  pantries  giving  the 


necessary  service  facilities  for  afternoon 
tea.  At  one  end  of  this  balcony,  be- 
tween the  lobby  and  the  main  dining 
room  and  opening  into  both,  is  the  musi- 
cians' balcony,  one  orchestra  thus  being 
capable  of  serving  for  both  rooms. 

A  special  banquet  elevator,  opening 
from  the  main  lobby  and  situated  adja- 
cent  to  the  carriage  entrance,  is  for  the 
use  of  residents  of  the  city  attending 
balls  and  banquets.  It  serves  as  still  an- 
other means  of  entrance  and  exit  for  the 
assembly  hall,  on  the  first  floor,  which 
is  accessible  by  the  main  passenger  ele- 
vators and  by  the  two  broad  marble  stair- 
cases situated  on  either  side  of  the  ele- 
vator enclosure. 

The  first  floor  is  devoted  exclusively  to 
the  entertainment  of  guests  and  provides 
unusual  facilities  for  balls,  conventions 
and  private  dinners.  Opening  from  the 
elevator  lobby  and  assembly  hall,  which 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


THE  BALL  ROOM-HOTEL  STATLER,  DETROIT,  MICH. 
Geo.  B.  Post  &  Sons,  Architects. 


A  CORNER  OF  THE  BALL  ROOM-HOTEL  STATLER,  DETROIT,  MICH. 
Geo.  B.  Post  &  Sons,  Architects. 


A  CORNER  OF  THE  MAIN  BANQUET 
ROOM— HOTEL  STATLER,  DETROIT,  MICH. 
GEO.  B.  POST  &  SONS.  ARCHITECTS. 


B-B 


H  o  * 

W  «  C 
^H^- 

aw 

z  P  =a 

<    . 

«  M  H 

w  K 


to  « 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


LARGE  PRIVATE  DINING  ROOM  --HOTEL  STATLER,  DETROIT,  MICH. 
Geo.  B.  Post  &  Sons,  Architects. 


SMALL  PRIVATE  DINING  ROOM-HOTEL  STATLER,  DETROIT,  MICH. 
Geo.  B.  Post  &  Sons,  Architects. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


335 


LADIES'  PARLOR  AND  RETIRING  ROOM— HOTEL  STATLER,  DETROIT,  MICH. 
Geo.  B.  Post  &  Sons,  Architects. 


LIBRARY— HOTEL  STATLER,  DETROIT,  MICH. 
Geo.  B.  Post  &  Sons,  Architects. 


336 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


TYPICAL  FLOOR  PLAN-HOTEL  STATLER,  DETROIT,  MICH. 
Geo.  B.  Post  &  Sons,  Architects. 


are  provided  with  ample  checking  facili- 
ties, are  the  ball  room,  banquet  rooms, 
and  various-sized  small  private  dining 
rooms,  all  so  arranged  that  they  can  be 
united  into  suites;  if  occasion  arises,  the 
entire  floor  can  be  utilized  for  an  extra 
large  affair.  The  ball  room,  main  ban- 
quet room,  and  small  banquet  room  are 
provided  with  maple  floors  for  dancing, 
and  the  pantries  are  so  arranged  that 
every  room  on  this  floor,  including  the 
ball  room,  has  dining  service. 

The  ball  room  extends  across  the  en- 
tire Park  front  of  the  building,  and  is  a 
•finely  lighted  room,  forty-seven  feet  in 
Width  by  one  hundred  feet  in  length,  with 
its  magnificent  expanse  of  dance  floor 
entiiely  free  of  columns.  The  room  is 
Adam  in  treatment,  the  key  note  being 
dignity  and  simplicity. 

The  plain  wall  surfaces  are  broken 
only  by  the  tall  fluted  pilasters  support- 


ing an  ornamental  plaster  cornice  and  a 
segmental  vaulted  plaster  ceiling  decor- 
ated in  low  relief.  Ivory  and  oyster 
shell  gray  are  the  prevailing  tones  of  the 
walls  and  ceiling,  and  the  window  hang- 
ings and  furniture  coverings  are  rose 
damask ;  the  scheme  as  a  whole  acting  as 
an  excellent  background  for  the  costumes 
and  jewels  to  be  seen  at  formal  affairs. 

The  decorative  scheme  throughout  the 
hotel  has  been  based  upon  the  assump- 
tion that  the  architectural  and  decorative 
treatment  of  a  room  should  always  be  so 
designed  that  it  will  provide  with  its 
furnishings  a  refined  background  for  the 
people  using  it,  and  that  there  is  never 
any  justification  for  that  type  of  over- 
decorated,  garishly  furnished  room 
where  the  only  purpose  served  by  the 
human  being  is  to  give  it  scale. 

Two  excellent  "background"  rooms  on 
the  first  floor  are  the  ladies'  retiring 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


337 


PLAN  OF  THIRTEENTH  AND  FOURTEENTH  FLOORS-HOTEL  STATLER,  DETROIT,  MICH. 

Geo.  B.  Post  &  Sons,  Architects. 


room,  which  opens  from  the  ball  room, 
and  the  library  adjoining  it.  The  ladies' 
retiring  room  is  a  finely  proportioned 
room  with  gray  panelled  walls  and  is  fur- 
nished in  the  Chinese  Chippendale  period. 
The  library  is  furnished  in  oak,  with  a 
ceiling  of  dull  antique  gold.  This  room 
contains  a  carefully  selected  library  of 
some  two  thousand  volumes  for  the  use 
of  guests,  and  a  hurried  glance  at  some 
of  the  book  titles  and  a  few  moments'  ' 
relaxation  in  one  of  the  comfortable 
English  chairs  with  its  reading  lamp 
close  by  convince  one  that  this  room  will 
be  one  of  the  most  used  and  homelike  in 
the  hotel. 

In  addition  to  the  other  private  dining 
rooms  on  this  floor  there  is  a  large 
private  dining  room  in  the  period  of 
Henry  II.  with  an  interesting  ceiling  in 
gray  antique  oak  decorated  with  poly- 
chrome ornament. 


The  main  banquet  room  and  small 
banquet  room  are  of  the  same  general 
style  as  the  ball  room.  Both  the  banquet 
room  and  the  ball  room  are  provided 
with  musicians'  balconies,  and  the  wide 
doorway  between  the  two  rooms  is  pro- 
vided with  two  sets  of  doors  so  that 
music  may  be  played  in  both  rooms 
simultaneously  without  interfering. 

In  the  planning,  equipment,  and  fur- 
nishing of  the  bed  room  floors,  the  guest 
will  find  the  highest  development  of  the 
Statler  service,  which  is  so  striking  a 
feature  of  the  Cleveland  and  Buffalo 
hotels  of  the  same  name. 

There  are  eight  hundred  guest  rooms 
in  the  greatest  variety  of  sizes  and  fur- 
nishings. The  majority  of  the  rooms 
are  of  moderate  size.  All  rooms  are 
easily  accessible  from  the  passenger  ele- 
vators located  in  the  center  of  the  build- 
ing and  opening  into  a  lobby  that  receives 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


339 


plenty  of  daylight.  Directly  back  of  the 
passenger  elevators  are  the  service  ele- 
vators and  service  hall,  and  in  close  prox- 
imity is  the  maids'  room.  Thus  the  focal 
point  of  the  floor  service  is  located  as 
centrally  as  are  the  passenger  elevators, 
assuring  prompt  and  economical  service 
for  the  entire  floor. 

Each  bedroom  is  provided  with  a  pri- 
vate bathroom,  running  ice-water,  ther- 
mostatic  heat  control,  telephone,  etc.  An 
interesting  instance  of  the  thoroughness 
with  which  the  comfort  of  the  guest  has 
been  considered  is  the  pincushion  found 
on  every  dresser,  and  which  holds 
needles,  pins,  thread,  buttons  of  assorted 
sizes,  and  even  hooks  and  eyes. 

The  bathrooms  are  ventilated  by  a  sys- 
tem of  forced  ventilation,  and  between 
every  two  bathrooms  is  a  vent  and  pipe 
shaft  containing  all  of  the  supply,  waste, 
vent,  steam  and  other  piping,  besides  the 
valves  controlling  the  bathroom  fixtures. 
This  shaft  is  accessible  from  every  bath- 
room, and  is  large  enough  to  admit  a 
workman,  thus  insuring  quick  and  ecox 
nomical  repair  of  all  piping. 

The  thirteenth  and  fourteenth  floors 
are  divided  into  large  rooms  for  the  dis- 
play of  samples,  and  these  rooms  have 
been  fitted  with  the  disappearing  wall 
type  of  bed,  which  is  concealed  in  a 
closet  when  not  in  use.  This  allows 
of  one  room  doing  double  service,  as 
bed  room  and  display  room,  thereby 
saving  the  salesman  the  added  cost 
and  inconvenience  of  engaging  two 
rooms. 

It  is,  of  course,  a  simple  matter  to  give 
good  service  to  the  guest  if  the  cost  of 
operation  be  disregarded;  and  it  is  also 
a  simple  matter  to  operate  cheaply  by 
giving  the  guests  no  service.  But  it  is 
quite  a  trick  to  give  complete  service  and 
at  the  same  time  maintain  economical 
operation. 

Accordingly,  the  service  parts  of  the 
house  have  been  so  planned  and  equipped 
that  the  corps  of  trained  employees  using 
it  will  be  able  to  give  complete  and  eco- 
nomical service.  This  was  considered  of 
so  great  importance  that  valuable  ground 
floor  space  with  street  frontage  on  Bag- 


ley  Avenue  was  devoted  to  the  kitchens 
and  the  service  entrance. 

The  location  of  the  kitchen  on  this 
floor,  and  between  the  main  dining  room 
and  the  grill  room,  assure.s  both  rooms 
perfect  "hot"  service.  The  kitchen  is  so 
arranged  that  all  food  leaving  it,  whether 
going  to  the  dining  rooms  on  the  ground 
floor,  to  the  bedrooms  upstairs  by  way 
of  the  service  elevators,  or  by  stairway 
or  lift  to  the  mezzanine  and  first  floor 
pantries,  must  pass  by  and  be  checked  at 
the  checker's  desk  located  at  the  unique 
entrance  and  exit. 

The  service  entrance  on  Bagley  Avenue 
contains  an  office  for  the  checker  and 
timekeeper,  who  controls  the  coming  and 
going  of  all  employees  and  materials. 
This  entrance  is  entirely  cut  off  from 
the  remainder  of  the  ground  floor,  all 
supplies  passing  into  the  basement  by  way 
of  the  sidewalk  lifts,  and  being  distrib- 
uted there  to  the  various  storerooms  or 
sent  to  the  floors  above  by  the  service 
elevators.  Employees  go  by  stairways, 
first  to  their  locker  rooms  in  the  basement 
or  on  the  mezzanine,  and  then  to  their 
various  departments. 

The  basement  is  free  of  any  room  for 
the  use  of  the  public,  as  the  barber  shop, 
and  men's  toilet  rooms  and  washroom, 
usually  to  be  found  tucked  away  in  the 
basement,  are  here  located  on  the  ground 
floor  mezzanine,  thus  insuring  unusually 
good  light  and  air,  as  well  as  adding 
greatly  to  their  accessibility. 

On  this  mezzanine  is  also  located  that 
service  department,  and  a  very  important 
one  it  is,  to  which  the  public  and  service 
have  access:  the  manager's  office  with 
its  accounting  department,  public  wait- 
ing lobby,  and  the  like. 

This  department  is  in  constant  touch 
by  telephones,  telautographs  and  pneu- 
matic tubes  with  every  unit  of  the  ex- 
ceedingly complex  organization  necessary 
to  run  this  most  modern  of  American 
hotels.  It  must  so  control  and  guide  the 
activities  of  the  various  departments  and 
its  hundreds  of  employees  that  to  the 
guest  it  will  seem  as  simple,  as  efficient, 
and  as  noiseless  in  operation  as  the  ser- 
vice of  a  small,  well-ordered  household. 


ENTRANCE  TO  FARMER'S  COTTAGE— ESTATE 
OF  ADOLPH  MOLLENHAUER,  ESQ.,  BAY  SHORE, 
L.  I.  ALFRED  HOPKINS,  ARCHITECT. 


FARMER'S  COTTAGE-ESTATE  OF  C.  V.  BROKAW,  ESQ.,  GLEN  COVE,  L.  I. 
Alfred  Hopkins,  Atchitect. 


TiHE 

EXAMPLES  FR.0M  THE  WORK  OF  ALFRED  HOPKINS 


FARM  buildings,  until  a  very  recent 
period,  were  planned,  almost  uni- 
versally, with  little  regard  for 
scientific  arrangement,  and  none  for 
architectural  treatment.  The  scientific 
aspect  has  come  to  be  seriously  consid- 
ered as  a  result  of  the  researches  of  the 
national  and  state  Departments  of  Agri- 
culture, while  the  architectural  improve- 
ment to  be  noticed  during  the  last  few 
years  has  been  due  to  the  growth  of  the 
gentleman  farmer,  who,  deriving  his  main 
income  from  other  sources,  was  in  a  posi- 
tion to  allow  himself,  in  the  design  of 
his  buildings,  a  more  generous  outlay  than 
was  possible  for  the  farmer  whose  sole 
revenue  was  derived  from  agriculture. 
We  find,  consequently,  that  the  newer 
farm  buildings  excel  the  older,  not  only 
from  a  decorative  standpoint,  but  from 
a  practical  standpoint  as  well.  The  labor 
of  farm  work  has  been  simplified,  the 


sanitation  is  greatly  improved,  and  the 
products  of  the  farm  are  of  better  qual- 
ity, particularly  in  the  matter  of  the 
purity  of  milk,  that  most  vital  point  in 
modern  sanitary  reform. 

To  this  improvement  no  architect  has 
contributed  more  than  Mr.  Alfred  Hop- 
kins. While  he  has  not  devoted  himself 
exclusively  to  farm  building  design,  he 
has,  to  some  extent,  specialized  in  this 
class  of  work,  and  in  many  cases  he  has 
been  called  upon  to  design  farm  build- 
ings on  estates  where  the  residences  were 
the  work  of  other  architects.  He  has 
also  written  extensively  on  this  subject, 
and  his  book,  "Modern  Farm  Buildings," 
is  one  of  the  leading  works  on  this 
phase  of  architecture. 

The  considerations  to  be  taken  into 
account  in  planning  a  farm  group  are 
both  practical  and  artistic.  From  the 
practical  side,  and  particularly  as  re- 


342 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


FARM  BUILDINGS-ESTATE  OF  HENRY  M.  TILFORD,  ESQ..  MONROE,   N.  Y. 
Alfred  Hopkins,  Architect. 


gards  milk  production,  the  problem  of 
cleanliness  is  paramount.  It  is  this  that 
dictates  the  isolation  of  the  dairy,  the 
planning  of  the  stables,  and  the  details 
of  much  of  the  interior  treatment.  Dust 
and  flies,  the  two  great  conveyers  of 
microbes,  are  the  chief  enemies  to  be 
excluded.  Hence  the  adoption,  in  the 
best  recent  work,  of  a  type  of  interior 
finish  that  can  be  thoroughly  washed, 
with  floors  usually  of  concrete,  walls  and 
ceilings  of  hard  plaster  in  place  of  the 
wood  finish  formerly  prevalent.  Hence 
the  elimination  of  interior  mouldings  and 
trim,  which  would  form  lodging  places 
for  dust.  Hence,  also,  the  removal  of 
the  hay  storage  from  its  traditional  loft 
over  the  stables,  thus  eliminating  the 
infiltration  of  dust,  as  well  as  the  pol- 
lution of  the  hay  by  the  foul  air  arising 
from  below.  These  details  form  the  sub- 
ject of  a  volume,  and  cannot  be  fully 
developed  in  this  article,  but  a  brief 
reference  to  them  is  necessary,  as  they 
determine,  to  a  great  extent,  the  group- 
ing of  the  various  buildings. 

Where  the  hay  used  is  produced  on  the 


farm  itself,  and  not  brought  in  from  the 
outside — although  this  latter  method  is 
not  infrequent — its  bulk  is  necessarily 
so  considerable  that  the  hay  barn  be- 
comes the  largest  building  of  the  group. 
The  separation  of  the  horses  from  the 
cattle  then  leads  to  a  typical  plan  in  which 
the  hay  barn  becomes  the  center,  with 
two  wings  of  varying  importance  balanc- 
ing each  other.  An  excellent  example 
of  this  type  is  the  group  of  buildings 
designed  by  Mr.  Hopkins  for  the  estate 
of  Mr.  Henry  M.  Tilford,  at  Monroe, 
N.  Y.  Here  the  hay  barn  occupies  the 
central  position,  and  its  location  at  the 
extreme  north  of  the  plan  shelters  the 
central  court,  used  as  a  cow  yard,  from 
the  cold  north  winds,  and  leaves  it  open 
to  the  rays  of  the  sun.  In  the  right 
wing  are  the  horse  stables,  with  five  ordi- 
nary stalls  and  four  box  stalls.  Adjacent 
are  the  harness  and  wagon  rooms,  open- 
ing on  a  second  court,  around  which  are 
also  grouped  the  machinery  and  tool 
rooms,  and  a  shed  for  the  rougher  farm 
wagons.  Above  the  wagon  room  are 
some  living  rooms  for  the  men,  reached 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


343 


DAIRY— ESTATE  OF  HENRY  M.  TILFORD,  ESQ.,  MONROE,  N.  Y. 
Alfred  Hopkins,  Architect. 


FARM   BUILDINGS— ESTATE  OF  HENRY  M.  TILFORD,   ESQ.,  MONROE,  N.  Y. 
Alfred  Hopkins,  Architect. 


344 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


PLAN  OF  FARM  BUILDINGS-  ESTATE  OF  HENRY  M.  TILFORD,  ESQ.,  MONROE,  N.  Y. 

Alfred  Hopkins,  Architect. 


by  an  outside  staircase.  The  adjoining 
tower  is  used  as  a  boiler  room,  while 
its  summit  accommodates  a  pigeon  house, 
a  picturesque  feature  that  Mr.  Hopkins 
has  frequently  introduced  into  his  de- 
signs. 

This  part  of  the  group  is  connected 
with  the  hay  barn  by  a  feed  room,  and  a 
similar  room  connects  with  the  other 
wing,  and  also  with  the  adjoining  silo. 
The  left  wing  is  divided  into  two  main 
parts,  one  for  the  milking  cows,  the 
other  for  the  young  stock,  the  calves,  and 
the  bull.  A  court  enclosed  by  these  two 
buildings  and  the  dairy,  but  open  to  the 
west,  is  used  as  a  yard  for  the  young 
stock,  while  the  bull  has  a  smaller  por- 
tion, fenced  off  at  the  end. 

The  dairy  is  more  closely  connected 
with  the  cow  barn  than  was  formerly 
considered  good  practice.  However,  if 
proper  standards  of  cleanliness  are  main- 
tained, this  should  not  be  a  serious  detri- 
ment, while  it  certainly  facilitates  the 
work  of  the  farm.  The  plan  of  the  dairy 
is  relatively  simple,  consisting  only  of  a 
milk  receiving  room,  a  milk  room,  wash 
room  and  laundry,  together  with  a  steril- 
izer and  a  refrigerator.  This  is  ample 
for  the  usual  requirements  of  a  private 
farm  of  considerable  size,  although  a 
commercial  plant  requires  a  more  com- 
plete installation. 

The  materials  used  for  the  exterior  of 
these  buildings  are  rough  local  stone  and 
shingles,  the  former  composing  the  larger 


part  of  the  walls.  The  general  treatment 
is  characterized  by  the  simplicity  appro- 
priate to  a  structure  of  this  nature,  the 
architectural  effect  being  obtained  almost 
entirely  by  the  differentiation  of  the  var- 
ious buildings  composing  the  group.  No 
attempt  has  been  made  to  secure  a  rigid 
symmetry,  the  effect  being  rather  a  pic- 
turesque balancing  of  masses,  each 
treated  as  simply  and  directly  as  possible. 
The  amount  of  applied  decoration,  in 
fact,  has  been  reduced  to  a  negligible 
quantity. 

In  the  buildings  on  the  estate  of  Mr. 
C.  V.  Brokaw,  at  Glen  Cove,  L.  I.,  the 
accommodation  for  both  cows  and  horses 
is  considerably  less  than  in  the  preceding 
example.  Here  a  single  feed  room  is 
used,  located  between  the  two  stables,  and 
the  hay  loft  is  placed  above  the  wagon 
house,  forming  the  dominating  mass  on 
the  axis  of  the  nearly  symmetrical  court- 
yard. The  arrangement  of  the  wagon 
shed  and  machinery  room  is  similar  to 
that  above  described,  and  the  tool  room 
is  located  at  the  entrance  to  the  court, 
balancing  the  calf  pens.  The  cow  yard 
is  placed  to  one  side,  adjacent  to  the  cow 
barn.  The  dairy,  placed  as  in  the  Tilford 
group,  is  smaller  and  simpler  in  arrange- 
ment, practically  all  the  work  being  done 
in  a  single  room.  Adjacent  to  it,  although 
not  directly  connecting,  is  the  farmer's 
cottage.  The  yard  lying  between  the 
cottage  and  the  cow  stables  is  used  for 
the  service  of  the  latter.  In  its  center  is 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


345 


MEN'S  QUARTERS,  FARM  BUILDINGS— ESTATE  OF  HENRY  M.  TILFORD,   ESQ.,  MONROE,  N.  Y. 

Alfred  Hopkins,  Architect. 


a  watering  trough,  above  which  has  been 
constructed  a  circular  corncrib,  supported 
by  four  brick  posts. 

The  effect  of  this  group  is  very  differ- 
ent from  the  preceding  one,  due  prin- 
cipally to  the  use  of  clapboards  as  the 
material  of  the  walls,  and  of  detail  of  a 
generally  Colonial  or  Georgian  character. 
The  buildings  are  low  and  rambling,  the 
only  conspicuous  exception  being  the  hay 
barn,  with  its  cupola  used  as  a  ventilator 
and  clock  tower.  The  essential  character 
of  a  hay  barn  is  well  expressed  by  the 
great  central  door  with  its  beam  and  hoist, 
and  by  the  louvers  for  additional  venti- 
lation. The  farmer's  cottage  is  a  pleasing 
bit  of  domestic  architecture,  and  the 
few  ornamental  details  are  excellently 
studied  in  the  style  adopted,  which  Mr. 
Hopkins  has  used  for  most  of  his  work 
on  Long  Island,  in  conformity  with  the 
houses  of  similar  character  that  are  so 
frequent  in  that  locality. 

The  south  side  of  this  group  of  build- 
ings faces  on  a  large  vegetable  garden,  on 
the  opposite  side  of  which  is  the  chicken 
house.  This  is  of  about  the  same  length 


as  the  main  farm  group — exclusive  of  the 
farmer's  cottage — and  is  treated  in  a  simi- 
lar manner,  though  with  slightly  greater 
simplicity.  The  north  side,  facing  the 
other  buildings,  is  decorated  with  a 
simple  but  attractive  arbor  of  trellis  work, 
while  on  the  south  side  are  the  runs  for 
the  poultry.  This  side  of  the  building  is 
very  open,  with  skylights  in  the  roof  so 
as  to  give  the  greatest  possible  amount 
of  sunlight,  while  the  north  side  has  only 
such  openings  as  are  necessary  for  ven- 
tilation. The  design  of  the  entire  build- 
ing has  been  studied  with  a  view  to  the 
greatest  possible  efficiency  and  conven- 
ience. 

In  the  farm  buildings  of  Mr.  Adolph 
Mollenhauer,  at  Bay  Shore,  L.  I.,  the 
chicken  house  is  combined  with  the  other 
farm  buildings,  in  a  single  group.  Here, 
again,  the  buildings  are  arranged  on  the 
three  sides  of  a  court,  but  the  orientation 
is  different,  and  has  produced  a  different 
distribution  of  the  various  parts. 

The  chicken  houses  face  the  south,  as 
on  the  Brokaw  estate,  and  their  runs 
are  similarly  arranged,  although  the  inter- 


346 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


1 


DBYING 

YAPD 


BOX    \ 

STALL  I 

,11  Jli  '         ' 

rcco  CM 


w  AGON 

M 

HOUSE 


AAACMINCOY 
COOM 


COUBT  YACD 


our 

PtNS 


WAGON 

SMCO 


PLAN  OF  FARM  BUILDINGS  AND  FARMER'S  COTTAGE— ESTATE  OF  C.  V.  BROKAW,  ESQ.. 

GLEN  COVE,  L.  I. 
Alfred  Hopkins,  Architect. 


iVf-y^'^^-'  &      ^  ^^€£»cvr: 


2 

1 

• 

8 

;                ] 

VCGL^ 

S                        jj 

T 

L.LL 

C 

0    A 


2 

nwSBR 

•s 

|EN 

1 

». 

f 

4 

ij 

! 

•y 

? 

«j 

^ 

?Tt1V.<v 

,  ,~nt*sra.!  r->  ,.->  4  V«A.'.^ 

CEttNMOOit 


'-"  s>  c-  icrC"*"5,^-^ 

^%\f»  ^ 

^XX  g    e-  v 


(«C9ei.ObO  Jift  »ci 

o»vo>o-rvo« 

SK'OC^JTJil**!. 


f~^    ~"\ 

oM 


GROUP  PLAN  OF  FARM  BUILDINGS  AND  VEGETABLE  GARDEN— ESTATE  OF  C.  V.  BROKAW, 

ESQ.,  GLEN  COVE,  L.  L 
Alfred  Hopkins,  Architect. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


347 


FARM  BUILDINGS  AND  FARMER'S  COTTAGE— ESTATE  OF  C.  V.  BROKAW,  ESQ.,  GLEN  COVE.  L.  I. 

Alfred  Hopkins,  Architect. 


FARM  BUILDINGS  AND  FARMER'S  COTTAGE— ESTATE  OF  C.  V.  BROKAW,  ESQ.,  GLEN  COVE.  L.  I. 

Alfred  Hopkins,  Architect. 


348 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


U  U 


1 4 


BUNS 


fOUSI. 
;OMc*tri    i  LOON. 


nop^t 


P»  a  » /oe     co«c«.«rirlo 


\ 


VIEW  AND  PLAN  OF  POULTRY  HOUSE- 
ESTATE  OF  C.  V.  BROKAW,  ESQ.,  GLEN  COVE, 
L.  I.  ALFRED  HOPKINS,  ARCHITECT. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL     RECORD. 


349 


WAGON  SHED  AND  TOOL  ROOM-ESTATE  OF  C.  V.  BROKAW,  ESQ.,  GLEN  COVE.  L.  I. 

Alfred  Hopkins,  Architect. 


nal  disposition  of  the  houses  is  somewhat 
different.  The  stables,  however,  are  much 
simpler,  being  arranged  for  only  two 
cows  and  three  horses,  with  a  single  feed 
room  and  no  hay  barn.  The  central  court, 
open  to  the  east,  is  divided  to  form  a 
cow  yard  and  a  paddock,  with  a  passage 
for  the  service  of  the  chicken  houses. 
Connected  with  the  horse  stable  is  the 
wagon  room,  and  next  to  it  a  shed  and 
machinery  room,  with  a  small  tool  room 
adjoining. 

The  farmer's  house  lies  a  little  to  the 
northeast  of  the  main  group,  and  is  con- 
nected with  it  by  an  arbor,  interestingly 
treated  with  trellis  work.  The  house  is 
a  pleasing  example  of  the  same  Colonial 
type  of  architecture  that  Mr.  Hopkins 
has  so  frequently  used.  It  differs  from 
the  Brokavv  group,  as  do  the  other  build- 
ings of  this  estate,  in  being  built  of 
shingles  instead  of  clapboards,  but  the 
treatment  is  otherwise  very  similar. 

The  buildings  of  this  group  are  more 
uniform  in  height  than  in  the  previous 
examples,  due  to  the  absence  of  the  domi- 
nating mass  of  the  hay  barn.  Any  pos- 


sibility of  a  too  monotonous  effect,  how- 
ever, has  been  obviated  by  the  introduc- 
tion of  decorative  motives  of  trellis  work, 
in  various  parts  of  the  group,  as  well  as 
by  the  addition  of  an  octagonal  tower, 
used  as  a  store-room  and  pigeon  house. 
The  peculiar  form  of  the  roof,  while 
not  without  precedent  in  the  old  Georgian 
examples,  is  still  sufficiently  unusual  to 
add  a  very  decided  note  of  interest  to  the 
group  of  buildings. 

The  buildings  on  the  estate  of  Mrs. 
Glenn  Stewart,  at  Locust  Valley,  L.  I., 
are  also  very  similar  in  character,  and 
perhaps  even  simpler  in  arrangement. 
The  main  group  is  arranged  on  three 
'  sides  of  a  small  garden,  open  to  the  north. 
On  the  east  side  are  the  dairy  and  cow 
barn,  with  only  two  stalls.  In  accord- 
ance with  Mr.  Hopkins'  practice,  these 
two  buildings  do  not  connect,  and  the 
only  access  from  one  to  the  other  is 
through  the  open  porch  adjoining.  The 
feed  room,  next  to  the  cow  barn,  forms 
the  angle  of  the  group.  It  serves  the 
horses  as  well  as  the  cows,  hence  its  con- 
siderable size,  which  would  be  somewhat 


350 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


VIEW  AND  PLAN  OF  FARM  BUILDINGS  AND  FARMER'S 
COTTAGE— ESTATE  OF  ADOLPH  MOLLENHAUER,  ESQ., 
BAY  SHORE,  L.  I.  ALFRED  HOPKINS.  ARCHITECT. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL     RECORD. 


351 


FARM  BUILDINGS— ESTATE  OF  ADOLPH  MOLLENHAUER,  ESQ.,  BAY  SHORE.  L.  I. 

Alfred  Hopkins,  Architect. 


excessive  for  the  latter  alone.  The  har- 
ness and  carriage  rooms,  adjoining  the 
feed  room,  form  the  south  side  of  the 
garden  court,  while  on  the  west  is  the 
farmer's  cottage. 

The  horses  are  lodged  in  a  separate 
wing,  containing  five  box  stalls  with 
Dutch  doors  and  broad  overhanging 
eaves.  The  wing  to  the  south,  shown  in 
the  plan  as  containing  chicken  houses  and 
additional  stall  room,  has  not  yet  been 
built. 

In  the  center  of  the  garden  court  is  a 
small  dove  cote  on  the  top  of  a  high  pole, 
around  the  base  of  which  is  an  octagonal 
seat.  The  entire  effect  of  the  garden  is 
rather  more  individual  than  one  expects 
the  surrounding  of  farm  barns  to  be,  and 
this,  no  doubt,  is  due  to  the  personal  taste 
of  the  owner. 

To  the  northwest,  at  a  distance  of  about 
one  hundred  and  fifty  feet  from  the  main 
group,  is  located  the  superintendent's  cot- 
tage. This  is  another  of  the t excellently 
designed  small  Colonial  hous'es  that  we 
have  already  seen  in  connection  with  Mr. 
Hopkins'  work.  It  is  slightly  more  am- 


bitious than  the  other  cottages  above  de- 
scribed, and  should  be  capable  of  furnish- 
ing a  useful  suggestion  to  the  builders  of 
small  country  houses.  The  treatment  of 
the  gables,  by  means  of  which  the  rear  of 
the  house  is  made  considerably  higher 
than  the  front,  should  have  special  adapt- 
ability. 

One  of  the  most  important  works  that 
Mr.  Hopkins  has  undertaken  is  the  "Sky- 
lands"  farm,  the  estate  of  Mr.  Francis 
Lynde  Stetson,  at  Sterlington,  N.  Y.  This 
includes  almost  every  type  of  building 
that  a  farm  might  well  contain,  the  build- 
ings being  scattered  over  a  vast  estate, 
and  employing  various  types  of  material 
and  of  architectural  treatment.  Several 
of  them  are  illustrated  in  Mr.  Hopkins' 
book,  and  from  them  we  have  chosen 
the  cow  barns  as  being  particularly  perti- 
nent to  the  subject  of  this  article,  and  as 
presenting  certain  features  that  are  not 
to  be  found  in  the  other  buildings  shown 
herein. 

The  buildings  in  question  are  note- 
worthy because  of  their  thorough  pro- 
tection against  fire,  a  measure  made  par- 


352 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


FARMER'S  COTTAGE— ESTATE  OF  ADOLPH  MOLLENHAUER,  ESQ.,  BAY  SHORE,  L.  I. 

Alfred  Hopkins,  Architect. 


FARM  BUILDINGS  AND  FARMER'S  COTTAGE-ESTATE  OF  ADOLPH  MOLLENHAUER,  ESQ., 

BAY  SHORE,  L.  I. 
Alfred  Hopkins,  Architect. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


353 


FARM  BUILDINGS— ESTATE  OF  MRS.  GLENN  STEWART,  LOCUST  VALLEY,  L.  I. 
Alfred  Hopkins,  Architect. 


ticularly  important  because  of  the  sur- 
rounding woods.  The  material  used  is 
reinforced  concrete  throughout,  except 
for  the  silo,  which  is  of  wood.  The  use 
of  concrete  has  led  naturally  to  a  type  of 
architecture  with  a  distinctly  Italian  sug- 
gestion, despite  the  absence  of  any  de- 
tails that  would  stamp  it  as  belonging  to 
a  definite  historic  style. 

The  main  building  consists  of  two 
wings,  at  right  angles  to  each  other.  The 
lower  of  the  two,  running  east  and  west, 
contains  the  quarters  for  the  milking 
cows,  ten  in  number,  with  bull  and  calf 
pens  adjoining.  The  other  wing  contains 
the  feed  room,  root  cellar,  hay  barn  and 
dairy,  this  last  a  fairly  complete  installa- 
tion of  five  rooms,  reached  from  the  cow 
stable  only  through  an  open  passage. 
Above  the  dairy  are  the  dairyman's  quar- 
ters, accessible  only  by  an  outside  stair- 
case. The  upper  part  of  the  hay  barn  is 
extended  over  the  root  cellar  and  part  of 
the  feed  room,  giving  abundant  space  for 
hay  storage.  On  the  exterior  of  the 
building  this  space  is  indicated  by  a  wall 
containing  no  windows,  and  pierced  only 


by  louvers,  while  the  dairyman's  rooms 
have  large  windows,  the  two  parts  being 
separated  by  an  open  porch. 

The  building  for  the  young  stock, 
erected  at  a  later  period,  is  entirely  inde- 
pendent of  the  main  building,  being  joined 
to  it  only  by  a  pergola.  The  silo  is  lo- 
cated between  the  two  buildings,  so  as 
to  serve  both  of  them  conveniently.  A 
storeroom  and  woodshed  are  connected 
with  the  building  for  the  young  stock, 
and  further  to  the  north  are  the  cow  and 
bull  yards,  each  with  a  shelter  open  to 
the  sun,  but  closed  against  the  cold  north 
winds. 

Several  features  of  this  plan  are  note- 
worthy, and  in  particular  the  great  pic- 
turesqiieness  of  effect  attained  by  a  simple 
use  of  the  material  adopted,  with  the  help 
of  a  certain  amount  of  planting,  and  with 
a  very  simple  and  convenient  arrange- 
ment of  services.  The  use  of  concrete  is 
also  notable  from  the  point  of  view  of 
sanitation,  as  no  material  presents  greater 
facilities  for  the  high  degree  of  cleanli- 
ness that  is  desirable  in  all  installations 
for  the  production  of  milk. 


%  Q  Q  o  O 

COTTAGC 

'  §0  O  Q  O  O  O 

ft  O 


PLANS  OF  FARM  BUILDINGS  AND  GROUNDS- 
ESTATE  OF  MRS.  GLENN  STEWART,  LOCUST 
VALLEY,  L.  I.  ALFRED  HOPKINS,  ARCHITECT, 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


355 


GARDEN  COURT  OF  FARM  BUILDINGS— ESTATE  OF  MRS.  GLENN  STEWART, 
LOCUST  VALLEY,  L.  I. 
Alfred  Hopkins,  Architect. 


While  these  are  by  no  means  all  the 
farm  buildings  recently  built  by  Mr. 
Hopkins,  they  are  sufficiently  various  in 
their  arrangement  to  be  fairly  typical  of 
his  recent  practice.  We  find  among  them 
the  use  of  stone,  shingles,  clapboards 
and  concrete,  as  the  materials  of  the 
buildings ;  we  find  horse  and  cow  stables, 
dairies,  cottages,  chicken  houses,  silos, 
hay  barns  and  other  accompanying  ser- 
vices, grouped  in  a  variety  of  ways.  But 
in  all  the  groups  we  find  the  same  spirit 
and  the  same  principles  of  composition. 

One  of  the  main  points  to  be  noted 
throughout  the  works  of  Mr.  Hopkins  is 
their  general  air  of  appropriateness  to 
their  position  and  use.  They  are  char- 
acteristically farm  buildings,  and  most  de- 
cidedly rural  in  character.  Their  gen- 
eral lowness  contributes  greatly  to  this 
effect,  and  so  do  the  low  pitch  of  the 
roofs  and  the  manner  in  which  the  build- 
ings are  joined  together  by  arbors  and 
covered  passages  instead  of  being  set 
down  anywhere,  without  apparent  rela- 
tion, as  on  the  ordinary  farm.  We  may 
note  also  the  reticence  in  the  use  of  orna- 


ment that  characterizes  all  this  work,  a 
feature  that  is  none  too  common  in  re- 
cent buildings,  where  the  prevailing  ten- 
dency seems  to  be  toward  the  use  of  a 
great  amount  of  detail,  so  fine  in  scale 
as  to  be  lost  in  the  executed  work.  Mr. 
Hopkins,  on  the  other  hand,  uses  few 
ornamental  details,  but  these  few  are  al- 
ways large  enough  in  scale  to  be  able  to 
produce  the  desired  effect. 

Another  important  point  is  the  freedom 
with  which  the  compositions  are  handled. 
While  Mr.  Hopkins  is  no  enemy  of  sym- 
metry, he  very  rightly  recognizes  that  the 
sacrificing  of  common  sense  to  a  formula 
is  by  no  means  advisable,  and  that  the 
different  parts  of  a  farm  group  demand 
different  proportions  and  different  fenes- 
tration,  and  he  has  combined  these  vary- 
ing factors  into  a  harmonious  whole, 
without  losing  either  variety  or  unity. 

On  the  practical  side,  also,  a  few  points 
may  be  noticed.  One  of  these,  to  be 
found  in  all  Mr.  Hopkins'  recent  plans, 
is  the  use  of  the  manure  trolley,  hung 
from  the  beams  above,  in  place  of  the  cart 
formerly  used,  with  a  great  gain  in  clean- 


356 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


SUPERINTENDENT'S  COTTAGE-ESTATE  OF  MRS.  GLENN  STEWART,  LOCUST  VALLEY,  L.  L. 

Alfred  Hopkins,  Architect. 


WOOD 

SHED 


KITCHEN 


nPANTrl 


PINING  CM 


BED 


BED  PM 


POPCH 


it * 


PLAN  OF  SUPERINTENDENT'S  COTTAGE— ESTATE  OF  MRS.  GLENN  STEWART, 

LOCUST  VALLEY,  L.  I. 
Alfred  Hopkins,  Architect. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


357 


SUPERINTENDENT'S  COTTAGE-ESTATE  OF  MRS.  GLENN  STEWART,  LOCUST  VALLEY,  L.  I. 

Alfred  Hopkins,  Architect; 


BOX  STALL  WING  OF  FARM   BUILDINGS-ESTATE  OF   MRS.   GLENN   STEWART, 

LOCUST  VALLEY,  L.  I. 
Alfred  Hopkins,  Architect. 


358 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


COW  BARN  AND  DAIRY-ESTATE  OF  FRANCIS  LYNDE  STETSON,  ESQ.,  STERLINGTON,  N.  Y. 

Alfred  Hopkins,  Architect. 


PLAN  OF  FARM  BUILDINGS— ESTATE  OF  FRANCIS  LYNDE  STETSON,  ESQ.,  STERLINGTON.  N.  Y. 

Alfred  Hopkins,  Architect. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


359 


COW  BARN  AND  SILO— ESTATE  OF  FRANCIS  LYNDE  STETSON,  ESQ.,  STERLINGTON,  N.  Y. 

Alfred  Hopkins,  Architect. 


liness  by  the  substitution.  The  track  can 
pass  anywhere  that  there  is  four  feet  of 
clear  width,  with  a  three  foot  radius  on 
the  turns.  In  the  cases  where  silos  are 
included  in  the  group  the  ensilage  can 
be  conveyed  on  the  same  track,  thus  add- 
ing considerably  to  simplicity  of  oper- 
ation. The  manure  trolley  sometimes 
passes  through  the  feed  rooms,  but  Mr. 
Hopkins  does  not  consider  this  a.  serious 
detriment,  as  a  little  care  avoids  all  pos- 
sibility of  contamination,  and  any  other 
arrangement  would  usually  lead  to  con- 
siderable complication  in  plan  and  con- 
sequently in  operation.  Where  the  track 
runs  outside  the  buildings  it  is  supported 
by  overhanging  eaves  or  rafters.  The 
old-fashioned  manure  pit  is  generally 
abandoned,  except  in  special  cases,  the 
manure  being  carted  away  and  stored  at 
some  distance. 

Another  departure  from  earlier  prac- 


tice is  in  the  location  of  the  dairy.  It 
was  formerly  believed  that  this  should  be 
as  far  from  the  barn  as  possible,  but  the 
inconvenience  of  this  arrangement  is 
scarcely  offset  by  its  value  in  preventing 
contamination,  since  this  is  more  likely 
to  occur  in  the  barn  than  in  the  dairy.  If, 
therefore,  the  two  buildings  are  effec- 
tively separated,  it  would  seem  that  all 
reasonable  precautions  in  planning  have 
been  taken,  and  the  problem  of  cleanli- 
ness becomes  one  of  administration. 

Other  details  might  be  mentioned,  but 
to  do  so  would  be  to  depart  too  widely 
from  the  limits  of  our  subject.  For  those 
whose  interest  in  this  type  of  buildings 
is  greater  than  can  here  be  satisfied,  we 
can  scarcely  do  better  than  to  commend 
the  very  instructive  volume  that  Mr. 
Hopkins  himself  has  written  on  this  sub- 
ject, in  which  he  epitomizes  the  results 
of  the  best  recent  practice. 


THE  TALMADGE  HOUSE.  LITCH- 
FIELD,  CONN.  FROM  WATER  COLOR 
DRAWING  BY  WESLEY  S.  BESSELL. 


COLONIAL  QAK.CHITECTVK.E 

IN   COHNECTICVT 


Text  and  Measured  "Drawings 
'Wesley  <£herwood  Bessell 


PART  I. 


IN  studying  the  old  Colonial  architec- 
ture of  Connecticut,  one  is  brought 
to  realize  how  little  remains  in  its 
original  state,  how  much  modern  meth- 
ods are  doing  to  kill  the  beauty  there 
was  in  the  homes  of  our  forefathers.  To 
pick  out  the  good  that  is  left,  without 
modern  addition  in  the  way  of  a  porch 
or  new  front  door  or  change  to  two- 
light  sash  to  mar  the  picture,  is  a  difficult 
task.  So  it  is  with  a  great  deal  of  satis- 
faction that  we  occasionally  catch  sight 
of  some  example  remaining  to  us  in  the 
original  state. 

Going  into  the  details  of  this  old  Colo- 
nial architecture,  the  different  periods  are" 
clearly  marked  by  the  changes  wrought 
in  our  manner  of  life  as  the  country  pro- 
gressed. 

When  we  see  a  house  similar  to  that 
built  about  1720  at  Essex,  shown  on  page 
362,  one  of  the  first  types  of  small 
houses,  we  must  close  our  eyes  to  the 
porch  attached  at  the  side.  Here  is  a 
house  two  hundred  years  old,  represent- 
ing the  beginnings  of  our  Colonial  archi- 
tecture, an  architecture  born  of  the  neces- 
sity for  economy  and  typical  of  the  sim- 
ple way  in  which  our  forefathers  lived. 
What  they  wanted  most  of  all  was  a 
home,  four  walls  with  as  little  ornament 
as  possible.  Here  was  simplicity,  the 
keynote  to  everything  worth  while.  How 
charming  is  the  house  with  its  simple 
lines  and  one  color  note  in  the  detailed 
doorway. 

From  these  primitive  Connecticut  sur- 
vivals a  lesson  is  to  be  gleaned.  Let  us 
go  to  the  quiet  of  an  out-of-the-way  place 
and  rest  awhile,  become  fascinated  by 
Simplicity.  The  results  will  be  beneficial 
in  many  ways.  You  will  see  that  to  get 
your  best  results  you  must  adhere  to  the 
study  of  simple  composition.  The  dis- 


position of  openings  will  count  for  far 
more  than  ornament  for  vacant  places. 

Let  us  analyze  one  of  these  houses. 
How  are  they  planned?  What  are  they 
built  from  ?  Who  designed  them  ?  Where 
did  the  ideas  originate  that  make  them 
so  dignified? 

As  to  the  planning,  it  is  extremely 
simple.  You  enter  a  small  hall;  against 
the  large  centre  chimney,  in  the  hall,  is 
the  stairway,  of  a  sharp  ascent,  the  rise 
and  tread  generally  nine  inches  by  nine 
inches,  making  a  rise  of  forty-five  de- 
grees and  not,  as  one  wpuld  imagine,  at 
all  difficult  to  go  up.  To  the  right  are 
two  rooms,  and  likewise  to  the  left.  The 
second  floor  is  similar.  In  the  very  early 
houses  there  was  only  one  room  on  either 
side  of  the  chimney.  This  was  the  gen- 
eral plan  with  few  exceptions.  For  the 
larger  houses  the  hall  was  carried 
through  the  house,  and  there  were  two 
chimneys,  one  at  each  end  of  the  house. 
The  houses  have  later  been  enlarged,  as 
occasion  arose,  by  putting  on  a  lean-to 
and  extending  the  roof  line  down  over  it. 
This  was  used  as  a  kitchen.  The  ceiling 
heights  vary  between  seven  and  eight 
feet  for  the  smaller  houses ;  the  larger 
ones  are  generally  higher. 

The  majority  are  built  of  oak  and  in- 
tended to  stay  "put,"  as  time  tells.  The 
rafters,  floor  beams  and  sheathing  boards 
are  from  the  rough,  and  all  these  boards 
are  left  as  they  were  ripped  from  the 
original  timber.  They  are  held  in  place 
with  the  wood  pins  of  those  days.  There 
is  no  flimsiness,  no  neglect  of  small  detail 
in  construction.  The  floor  beams  were 
of  oak,  usually  five  by  six  inches,  and 
these  are  still  in  an  excellent  state,  the 
core  being  sound.  The  girders  were  solid 
and  about  ten  by  twelve  inches.  Some 
girders  were  supported  by  oak  columns 


362 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


HOUSE  AT  ESSEX,  CONN.,  BUILT  ABOUT  1720.  ONE  OF  THE  EARLIEST  TYPES  OF. 
SMALL    COLONIAL    HOUSES. 


twelve  inches  square.  The  walls  were 
constructed  of  stone  in  the  early  houses, 
stone  only  being  procurable ;  and  of  stone 
or  brick  in  the  later  ones,  the  brick  be- 
ing imported  from  England  or  made  in 
the  Colonies. 

As  to  who  designed  these  early  houses 
our  knowledge  is  meagre.  Few  names 
are  left  to  us.  Generally  the  builder  was 
also  the  designer.  In  the  case  of  the 
Hotchkiss  house  at  Old  Saybrook,  there 
is  an  original  agreement  between  owner 
and  builder,  as  follows : 

"Terms  of  agreement  entered  upon  and 
concluded  between  Mr.  Humphrey  Pratt, 
Junr.,  on  this  one  part  and  Frederick 
William  Hotchkiss  on  the  other. 

"Concluded — That  he,  Mr.  Humphrey 
Pratt,  Junr.,  will  build  an  house  for  Fred- 
erick William  Hotchkiss.  The  dimen- 
sions of  the  house  shall  be  as  follows, 
viz.,  38  feet  in  length,  29  feet  in  breadth. 
16  feet,  posts,  in  heighth,  a  plain  upright 
house  to  be  finished  on  the  outside  and 
in  the  inside  carried  as  far  as  the  com- 
pletion of  the  chambers  floor  according 
to  the  manner  of  that  which  was  the 
property  of  Samuel  Elliott,  Esq.,  late  of 


this  place,  deceased,  except  that  it  be  only 
a  wooden  structure,  and  the  fire  place 
in  the  front  rooms,  above  and  below, 
shall  be  of  brick;  that  it  have  a  brass 
lock  and  ketch  of  a  large  kind  on  the 
front  door,  and  two  knob  locks  of  a 
smaller  kind  on  the  inside  door,  together 
with  plain  works  over  the  windows.  The 
whole  specified  in  calculation  made  by  a 
committee  for  that  purpose.  For  the 
above  building  Mr.  Humphrey  Pratt, 
Junr.,  is  to  receive  the  sum  of  two  hun- 
dred and  fifty  pounds  lawful  money. 

"He  likewise  engages  to  provide  mate- 
rials for  sd  building  on  the  former  part 
of  this  sum,  being  for  materials  and  for 
finishing  this  house  as  above  specified. 
Frederick  Wm.  Hotchkiss  on  his  part  is 
to  pay  the  sum  of  one  hundred  pounds 
lawful  money,  which  money  becomes  clue 
to  him  from  this  society  on  the  26th  day 
of  September,  1784,  as  soon  as  the  same 
money  be  collected,  to  Mr.  Humphrey 
Pratt.  He  likewise  engages  that  he  will 
do  his  endeavor  that  it  shall  be  collected 
as  speedily  as  possible  or  otherwise  will 
give  Mr.  Humphrey  Pratt,  Junr.,  his  full 
power  to  collect  it  of  the  collector,  or 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


363 


committee,  and  Frederick  Wm.  Hotch- 
kiss  likewise  promises  that  Mr.  Hum- 
phrey Pratt,  Junr.,  shall  hereby  become 
entitled  to  the  remaining  sum  of  one  hun- 
dred and  fifty  pounds  lawful  money  due 
for  finishing  the  house  as  above  on  the 
26th  day  of  September,  1785,  provided 
sd  house  be  finished  as  is  agreed  upon 
above  and  provided  also  that  the  same 
sum  of  one  hundred  and  fifty  pounds 
lawful  money  which  will  then  become 
due  to  Frederick  Wm.  Hotchkiss  from 
this  society  be  collected  by  the  committee 
as  collector  of  society,  rate  or  otherwise ; 
if  not  collected  by  a  reasonable  time  after 
that  sd  26th  day  of  September,  1785, 
that  he,  the  Rev.  Dr.  William  Hotchkiss, 
will,  if  deposited,  give  Mr.  Humphrey 
Pratt,  Junr.,  his  full  power  to  collect  the 
same  of  the  committee  so-called.  The 
same  conditions  or  terms  of  agreement 
we,  Mr.  William  Humphrey  Pratt  on  his 
contract  and  Frederick  William  Hotch- 
kiss on  the  other  part,  do  mutually  agree 
to  perform  and  abide  by  and  faithfully 
accomplish;  witness  our  hands  this  26th 
day  of  May  Anno  Domini,  1784. 


Saybrook  Society,  May  26,  1784. 
HUMPHREY  PRATT,  JUNR. 
FREDERICK  WILLIAM  HOTCHKISS. 
"This  house  settled  and  paid  for  and 
receipt  given  as  per  receipt  to  be  seen  in 
full. 

HUMPHREY  PRATT 

For  building  my  house, 

1784." 

This  agreement  is  written  in  the  long- 
hand of  the  day,  and  the  builder  was  the 
architect.  Along  with  the  agreement  was 
a  memorandum  of  material,  of  fifty 
words,  so  worn  that  it  cannot  be  made 
out.  In  truth,  contractors  were  to  be 
trusted  then.  It  was  in  this  house  that 
Samuel  Morse,  inventor  of  the  telegraph, 
lived.  Contractors  would  use  Asher  Ben- 
jamin's "Handbook,"  or,  if  earlier, 
Beatty  Langley's  "Builders  Jewel,"  to 
which  books  are  due  the  great  quantity 
of  good  detail.  The  house  consisted  of 
four  walls  and  a  roof.  To  quote  Emerson, 
"The  line  of  beauty  was  the  line  of  per- 
fect economy"  probably  sums  up  the 
architectural  merit  of  the  Colonial  style. 


SMALL  HOUSE  AT  LITCHFIELD,  CONN.,  OF  THE  PERIOD  OF  THE  GREEK  REVIVAL. 


STREET  FRONT  OF  THE  HAYDEN 
HOUSE,  ESSEX,  CONN.  MEASURED 
AND  DRAWN  BY  WESLEY  S.  BESSELL. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


365 


THE  HAYDEN  HOUSE,  BUILT  IN  1665.    THE  SECOND  OLDEST  HOUSE  AT  ESSEX,  CONN. 


The  typical  small  house  illustrated  on 
page  362  one  will  see  a  great  many  of  in 
a  day's  journey.  There  is  also  much  of 
the  handiwork  of  the  period  called  the 
Classical  Revival ;  and  may  it  be  said  of 
the  builders  of  that  period,  they  had 
ability  and  soundness  well  worth  study- 
ing. Just  as  one  period  was  woven  into 
the  other  by  additions  to  the  English 
country  homes,  preserving  a  beautiful 
whole,  so  has  this  Revival  worked  into 
our  purely  Georgian  architecture.  After 
that,  however,  traditions  were  broken, 
and  only  in  spots  do  we  see  hope  of  their 
return.  The  small  house  at  Litchfield 
(page  363)  is  of  this  period. 

It  is  interesting  to  note  when  compar- 
ing the  Hayden  house  at  Essex,  the  home 
of  the  gruff  old  sea  captain,  with  the 
Wolcott  house  at  Litchfield.  the  home  of' 
the  Governor  of  the  State  and  signer  of 
the  Declaration  of  Independence,  that  the 
directness  of  lines  and  composition  is 
practically  identical ;  the  planning  also  is 
the  same,  and  yet  these  places  are  a  great 
distance  apart. 

Essex  is  a  place  of  interest.  One  would 
imagine  oneself  back  a  hundred  years. 
Here  was  the  beginning  of  the  Haydens 
in  1665,  the  Pratts,  the  Denisons,  and 
other  well-known  families.  The  old 


Hayden  house,  illustrated  herewith,  is 
a  veritable  library  of  knowledge ;  here 
has  hung  for  years  a  woodcut  of  George 
III  and  his  consort ;  here  are  old  knock- 
ers brought  over  from  England  at  the 
time  the  house  was  built  by  Capt.  Hay- 
den; here  are  beautifully  panelled  rooms, 
to  be  illustrated  in  a  later  article;  and 
here  also  is  the  quoining  at  the  corners 
of  the  building  similar  to  that  at  Mount 
Vernon,  although  this  house  is  of  an 
earlier  date.  This  surely  is  the  begin- 
ning of  our  Colonial  architecture.  Quaint 
Essex,  with  its  little  streets  that  end  ab- 
ruptly at  the  water's  edge,  or  against  a 
little  white  house.  Would  there  were 
many  more  such  towns  instead  of  our 
modern  jumble  of  Spanish  Mission,  so- 
called  Colonial,  English  and  Modern- 
esque  architecture,  all  shuffled  up  and  fill- 
ing endless  streets  with  their  conglom- 
erant  of  ideas. 

The  details  are  traced  in  a  very  inter- 
esting manner.  The  mouldings  that  were 
on  one  house  in  a  town  were  likewise 
used  on  others,  showing  clearly  that  the 
builder  had  the  moulds  run  from  the 
same  knife.  These  mouldings  were  very 
carefully  cut  out,  as  one  can  see  by  re- 
moving the  paint  from  any  one  member. 
The  cyma  recta  and  cyma  reversa,  the 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


367 


THE  STARKEY  HOUSE  AT  ESSEX,  CONN.,  BUILT  IN  1750. 


HEZECAH  PRATT  HOUSE,  ESSEX,  CONN.,  BUILT  IN  1744.    DOOR  IS  OF  LATER  DATE. 


368 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


THE  OLIVER  WOLCOTT  HOUSE,  1752.    OLDEST  HOUSE  AT  LITCHFIELD,  CONN 


THE  NORTON  HOUSE,  BUILT  IN  1803,  EAST  GOSHEN,  CONN. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


369 


quarter  round,  in  fact  all  mouldings, 
were  very  carefully  studied  and  used, 
one  with  the  other,  in  a  manner  well 
worth  copying. 

The  earliest  houses  had  no  gutters,  but 
on  later  ones  wood  was  used  for  gutters. 
Today  these  are  replaced  by  the  metal 
gutters  used  everywhere.  A  few  of  the 
houses  had  copper  gutters  and  leaders. 
Examples  of  leader  heads  are  few,  but 
some  are  very  exquisite ;  unlike  anything 
used  today,  they  have  usually  a  long  and 
tenuated  feeling. 

Sash  and  frames  were  made  of  oak ; 
the  frame  usually  solid  wood  and  the 
sash  doubled,  with  nine  lights  to  a  sash, 
the  glass  commonly  seven  inches  by  eight 
and  a  half  inches.  No  weights  were 
used,  windows  being  held  in  place  by 
pins  slipped  through  the  sash  into  the 
frames  at  a  proper  height. 

The  shingles  were  hand  riven,  irregu- 
lar, few  of  which  remain.  All  clapboards 
were  fastened  by  the  old  wrought  iron 


nails  with  large  heads  or  with  oak  pins, 
and  at  coast  and  river  towns  the  boat  nail 
was  used,  very  often  left  clearly  exposed 
to  be  painted  over. 

The  Starkey  house  at  Essex  conveys 
a  dominant  impression  of  repose.  The 
doorway  is,  as  usual,  the  color  note,  to- 
gether with  the  Palladian  window  over  it. 
Formerly  all  the  sash  contained  small 
lights,  and  the  roof  was  of  shingles  in- 
stead of  imitation  shingles  in  metal.  The 
house  is  of  an  early  date,  and,  while 
alike,  it  is  still  unlike  the  Smith  house 
at  Litchfield,  built  at  the  end  of  the 
Classic  Revival. 

The  Norton  house,  though  not  a  small 
house,  was  built  in  1803,  about  the  time 
when  some  of  the  most  refined  and  deli- 
cate detail  was  being  executed. 

We  shall  take  up  in  future  articles 
the  details,  such  as  doorways,  man- 
tels and  panelled  rooms;  and  by  this 
means  we  shall  see  wherein  the  beauty 
of  things  Colonial  lie. 


THE  LYMAN  SMITH  HOUSE,  BUILT  IN  1833,  LITCHFIELD,  CONN. 


"PENCOYD,"  BALA,  MONTGOMERY  COUNTY. 
PA.  RESTORATION  AND  ADDITIONS  BY 
LOUIS  CARTER  BAKER,  JR.,  ARCHITECT. 


372 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


375 


JICOWD  TLOOX,  Pi-AW 


TLOOi.  PLAU 


LIVING  ROOM  AND  PLANS-HOUSE  OF  HENRY  S. 
DRINKER,  ESQ.,  WYNNEWOOD,  PA.  ALTERATIONS 
AND  ADDITIONS  BY  MELLOR  &  MEIGS,  ARCHITECTS. 


r") 

v^ 


0 


a  c  « 
£S£ 

2     .  W 

C0><    H 


o 
oS 


P< 
^ 

> 


) 


O  c«  O 

a  w  PS 


DOORWAY-HOUSE  OF  GEORGE  K. 
SMITH,  ESQ.,  ST.  LOUIS  COUNTY. 
MO.  ROTH  &  STUDY,  ARCHITECTS. 


;  «5&p/5fc*£ 


ARCHITECT'S    LI 


BOOKS  FROM  UNIVERSITY  PRESSES 

By  RICHARD  FRANZ  BACH 

Curator,  School  of  Architecture,  Columbia  University 
PART   II. 


THE  Princeton  University  Press  has 
also  issued  a  volume  of  high  qual- 
ity in  Luca  della  Robbia  by  Allan 
Marquand  (No.  Ill  of  the  Princeton 
Monographs  in  Art  and  Archaeology ; 
Princeton  University  Press,  Princeton, 
N.  J. ;  pp.  286;  quarto,  $7.50.  This  is  ar- 
ranged as  a  catalogue  raisonne  of  the 
works  of  the  great  architectural  colorist 
of  the  fifteenth  century,  in  which  the  ar- 
tist's works  are  chronologically  listed. 
Documents  bearing  on  his  life  and  activ- 
ity are  printed  where  found  advisable  and 
careful  bibliographies,  arranged  by  cen- 
turies, appear  after  each  number  of  the 
catalogue.  This  volume  is  likewise  the 
first  of  a  series.  There  will  ultimately  be 
four  concerning  the  family  of  the  name 
of  Robbia;  the  second  will  concern  An- 
drea della  Robbia,  the  third  Giovanni 
della  Robbia  and  the  fourth  the  Robbia 
School. 

The  body  of  the  present  volume  is  pre- 
ceded by  a  biographic  introduction,  to 
which  are  appended  a  number  of  docu- 
ments concerning  Luca  in  the  original 
Italian.  One  hundred  and  twenty-seven 
works  are  listed,  and  these  are  grouped 
in  five  chapters,  each  covering  a  decade  of 
Luca's  creative  life,  beginning  1430  and 


ending  1480,  followed  by  a  sixth  section 
including  works  in  the  manner  of  Luca 
della  Robbia. 

Luca  della  Robbia  was  born  in  1399  or 
1400.  His  chief  activity  was  in  stone, 
marble,  bronze  and  terra  cotta,  although 
Vasari  claims  that  his  father  set  him  to 
learn  the  goldsmith's  art  under  Leonardo 
di  Ser  Giovanni.  Donatello's  influence 
has  by  many  been  traced  in  Luca's  work, 
notably  in  the  Cantoria  and  Campanile 
reliefs  at  Florence,  but  Professor  Mar- 
quand demonstrates  that  Luca's  works 
both  antedate  those  of  Donatello  whence 
their  inspiration  is  supposed  to  have  em- 
anated, namely  the  latter's  dancing  chil- 
dren at  Prato  and  at  Florence  and  his 
disputants  in  bronze  on  the  sacristy  doors 
of  S.  Lorenzo.  It  is  not  to  be  doubted, 
however,  that  the  advice  of  Donatello  was 
welcomed  by  della  Robbia ;  this  is  seen  in 
the  consistent  use  of  receding  planes  in 
the  marble  altar  of  S.  Pietro,  a  manner 
not  generally  preferred  by  Luca.  Other 
noteworthy  influences  in  the  work  of  this 
artist  were  those  of  Brunelleschi'  and  of 
Lorenzo  Ghiberti.  The  effect  of  the 
former  "could  hardly  have  extended 
much  beyond  architectural  details," 
whereas  strictly  sculptural  portions  of 


380 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


Luca's  works  show  a  dependence  on  Lo- 
renzo Ghiberti.  The  best  work  of  this 
member  of  the  della  Robbia  family  was 
done  for  the  Florentine  Duomo,  although 
his  efforts  did  not  lack  the  appreciation 
of  the  great  houses  of  art  patrons,  such 
as  the  Medici,  notably  Cosimo  and  Piero, 
the  Pazzi,  Buondelmonti  and  Capponi. 

Luca's  works  were  "varied  in  charac- 
ter, comprising  a  choir  gallery,  bronze 
doors,  lunettes,  ceilings,  pavements,  dec- 
orative and  commemorative  medallions, 
altarpieces,  shrines,  statues,  groups  and  a 
sculptural  monument."  Although  he  fa- 
vored the  architectural  point  of  view— 
"his  mouldings  deserve  careful  study"- 
on  one  hand ;  his  reliefs,  on  the 
other,  "exhibit  little  interest  in  the  prob- 
lems of  perspective  and  anatomy,  which 
attracted  so  much  attention  in  his  day." 
Luca's  results  show  that  he  loved  nature 
and  revered  religion.  He  has  a  deep  sym- 
pathy for  the  form  and  color  of  flowers 
and  of  fruits.  Although  animals  attract 
him  little,  the  human  form  engrosses  him. 
Above  all,  he  is  known  by  his  profound 
feeling  for  the  beauty  of  womanhood,  and 
the  exuberant  life  and  simplicity  of  child 
life.  His  sole  contribution  to  his  art  was 
"the  application  of  white  and  colored 
enamels  to  terra  cotta  figures  and  reliefs." 
Professor  Marquand  doubts  the  stock- 
statement  that  the  della  Robbia  glaze  was 
a  secret  composition,  for  which  the  form- 
ula has  not  yet  been  discovered.  He 
points  out  that  "glazes  of  a  similar  char- 
acter had  been  employed  by  Egyptians 
and  Persians  in  ancient  times,  and  to  a 
limited  degree  by  Greeks  and  Romans. 
Throughout  the  Middle  Ages  majolica,  or 
glazed  faience,  was  still  made  in  Italy, 
and  many  towns  began  to  be  celebrated 
for  the  manufacture  of  majolica  before 
Luca  was  born."  Luca  used  his  glaze  as 
a  substitute  for  marble,  with  the  result 
that  his  figures  are  generally  white.  His 
color  sense  was  one  of  ultimate  refine- 
ment, and  his  sense  of  fitness  or  appro- 
priateness for  the  purpose  to  be  served 
was  at  the  bottom  of  each  of  his  under- 
takings. In  his  conceptions,  he  was  ever 
a  naturalist,  but  a  saving  grace  of  artistic 
restraint  prevented  him  from  being  a 
thorough  realist.  His  death  occurred  in 
1482,  after  the  great  era  of  ceramic  work 


inaugurated  by  his  nephew,  Andrea  della 
Robbia,  was  already  well  under  way. 

Professor  Marquand's  work  is  a  mar- 
vel of  care  and  accuracy,  its  arrangement 
is  destined  to  render  it  highly  useful. 
Although  there  are  no  colored  illustra- 
tions, the  one  hundred  and  eighty-six  re- 
productions presented  give  a  fair  idea  of 
the  man's  work  in  a  field  which  is  at  the 
moment  much  neglected,  namely  that  of 
the  introduction  of  color  in  architecture. 

The  commanding  authority  of  Vitru- 
vius  has  cast  its  portentous  shadow  across 
the  path  of  the  Renaissance.  It  has  dom- 
inated with  transcending  force  the  de- 
velopment of  antique  forms  in  their  mod- 
ern interpretation  in  such  degree,  that  his 
work  itself  may  justly  be  called  a  classic,, 
though  it  is  not  characterized  by  marked 
literary  graces.  The  small  matters  of  the 
identity  of  the  author,  the  time  at  which 
he  flourished,  the  authenticity  of  his  mas- 
ter work,  and,  by  way  of  climax,  the 
actual  and  observational  foundation  for 
the  theories,  principles  and  processes  of 
which  he  discourses,  have  for  many  a 
day  been  moot  questions ;  they  have  peri- 
odically engaged  men's  minds,  but  have 
not  finally  been  invested  with  sufficient 
fact  and  reality  to  give  them  a  definite 
place  in  the  history  of  architecture.  To 
this  day  we  are  not  fully  assured  that  Vit- 
ruvius  lived  in  the  Augustan  age,  though 
Latin  philologists  generally  agree  on  that 
period. 

His  work  appears  in  its  first  American 
translation  under  the  auspices  of  the  Har- 
vard University  Press,  with  the  title 
Vitruvius:  The  Ten  Books  OH  Architec- 
ture, translated  by  Morris  Hickey  Mor- 
gan, with  illustrations  and  original  de- 
signs prepared  under  the  direction  of 
Herbert  Langford  Warren,  revised  and 
edited  for  publication  by  Albert  A.  How- 
ard (Harvard  University  Press,  Cam- 
bridge, Mass. ;  crown  octavo ;  pp.  xiii — 
331,  index;  $3.50).  Other  translations 
into  German  and  into  French  have  ap- 
peared recently,  the  latter  by  Choisy.  Like 
all  classic  writings  of  equivalent  impor- 
tance the  work  under  discussion 'was  fre- 
quently transcribed ;  the  latest  of  the 
transcriptions  dates  from  1316.  What 
may  be  called  the  first  edition  dates  from 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL     RECORD. 


381 


1486,  while  under  Julius  II,  Fra  Gio- 
condo,  at  one  time  an  associate  architect 
of  St.  Peter's,  published  a  critical  edition, 
which  has  furnished  a  number  of  the  il- 
lustrations used  by  Professor  Warren  for 
the  present  translation.  This  is  the  fourth 
version  in  English ;  the  first  was  by  New- 
ton (1791),  the  second  by  Gwilt  (1826), 
the  third  by  Wilkins  (1872). 

But  who  was  this  embodiment  of  arch- 
itectural omniscience  and  what  was  his 
place  in  architectural  development?  To 
begin  with,  the  manual  of  Vitruvius  is 
the  only  work  of  its  type.  Much  of  it  is 
the  result  of  his  personal  experience,  al- 
though we  know  of  only  one  work  of  his 
hand  in  the  practical  field,  the  Basilica  of 
Fano ;  on  the  other  hand,  he  was  greatly 
indebted  for  much  of  his  material  to  An- 
axagoras,  Ictinus,  Theodorus  and  others. 
At  a  time  when  archaeological  investiga- 
tion was  as  undreamt  of  as  the  Martian 
canals,  when  the  beauties  of  Imperial 
Rome  were  crumbling  with  neglect  or 
served  as  quarries  for  current  work,  there 
was  no  other  record  of  old  Roman  build- 
ing, much  less  of  that  of  Greece.  In  the 
eyes  of  the  architects  of  the  Renaissance 
he  was  the  corner  stone  of  professional 
faith.  Alberti  borrowed  from  his"  work 
in  preparing  his  De  Architecture! ;  Palla- 
dio  writes :  "I  proposed  to  myself  Vitru- 
vius as  my  master  and  guide" ;  in  Cham- 
bers' Civil  Architecture,  his  name  often 
appears,  while  in  Newton's  translation  he 
is  proclaimed  "the  father  of  the  art."  Al- 
though in  his  lifetime  he  seems  to  have 
been  a  sort  of  pariah,  in  his  own  -opinion, 
at  least ;  in  the  centuries  following  his 
time  his  word  became  gospel,  with  never 
an  attempt  at  verification.  For  these 
reasons  Professor  Morgan's  new  transla- 
tion has  an  added  value;  it  is  a  careful 
and  thorough  work  by  an  able  student  of 
the  classics ;  while  Professor  Warren's 
exact  knowledge  of  ancient  building  has 
contributed  valuable  assistance. 

For  Vitruvius  the  word  "architecture" 
had  an  all  embracing  connotation.  At 
the  end  of  his  volume,  he  says :  "Such 
principles  of  machines  as  I  could  make 
clear,  and  as  I  thought  most  serviceable 
for  times  of  peace  and  of  war,  I  have 
explained  in  this  book.  In  the  nine  ear- 
lier books  I  have  dealt  with  single  topics 


and  details,  so  that  the  entire  work  con- 
tains all  the  branches  of  architecture." 
The  "single  topics  and  details"  will  be 
found  to  cover  methods  of  finding  water 
and  the  construction  of  cranes,  astrology 
and  weather  prognostics,  musical  theory 
and  chronometry,  not  to  mention  purely 
architectural  matters,  such  as,  planning, 
construction,  orders,  materials  and  theory 
of  design.  But  it  was  a  characteristic  of 
many  an  old  treatise  to  attempt  to  span 
the  universe ;  and  we  are  mindful  of  an 
ancient  and  sturdy  encyclopaedia  of  uni- 
versal knowledge  in  one  volume. 


A  NEGLECTED  SUBJECT 

VERY  few  writers  of  books  have  the 
good  fortune  or  the  good  sense  to 
write  books  which  deal  adequately 
with  a  hitherto  neglected  subject,  and 
when  such  a  book  is  written  and  pub- 
lished it  deserves  more  than  usually  close 
attention.  Mr.  Cecil  C.  Evers'  book  on 
The  Commercial  Problem  in  Buildings* 
does  deal  with  a  hitherto  neglected  sub- 
ject, and,  what  is  more,  it  discusses  and 
explains  this  subject  with  exact  and  ex- 
haustive knowledge  and  with  the  utmost 
perspicacity. 

Considering  the  large  number  of  peo- 
ple all  over  the  United  States  who  are 
vitally  interested  in  the  development  and 
the  management  of  urban  real  estate,  it 
is  extraordinary  that  so  little  writing  has 
been  done  upon  the  subject.  Mr.  R.  M. 
Hurd's  "Principles  of  City  Land  Values" 
remains  almost  the  only  adequate  dis- 
cussion of  the  conditions  which  actually 
determine  the  price  of  urban  land,  and 
the  work  which  was  so  well  begun  eleven 
years  ago  by  Mr.  Kurd  is  now  carried 
on  by  Mr.  Evers.  The  latter's  book  is  in 
a  real  sense  supplementary  to  the  for- 
mer's. The  former  explained  the  condi- 
tions which  give  value  to  the  sites  upon 
which  city  buildings  are  erected.  The 
latter  deals  with  the  conditions  which  de- 
termine successful  building  in  cities  for 
commercial  purposes. 


"The  Commercial  Problem  in  Buildings.  A  dis- 
cussion of  the  economic  and  structural  essentials  of 
profitable  buildings,  and  the  basis  for  valuation  of 
improved  real  estate.  By  Cecil  C.  Evers,  vice-presi- 
dent of  the  Lawyers'  Mortgage  Co.  111.  8vo.  271 
p.,  index.  New  York :  The  Record  and  GTuide  Co. 
$1.50. 


382 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


Mr.  Evers,  like  Mr.  Hurd,  has  every 
reason  to  know  a  good  deal  about  urban 
real  estate,  because  he  is  professionally 
engaged  in  deciding  whether  certain 
classes  of  buildings  are  likely  to  be  prof- 
itable on  particular  sites.  The  examples 
which  he  uses  in  order  to  give  point  to 
his  assertions  are  for  the  most  part  those 
which  have  come  under  his  own  observa- 
tion. 

The  distinguishing  quality  of  the  book 
is  its  eminent  and  complete  serviceabil- 
ity. It  is,  properly  speaking,  a  manual 
for  the  man  who  is  interested  in  build- 
ing houses  for  commercial  purposes  of 
any  kind  or  in  any  city.  The  careful 
reading  of  the  book  is  almost  certain  to 
enable  such  a  man  to  avoid  mistakes  and 
to  save  money,  and  a  very  little  exercise 
of  intelligence  will  help  the  reader  not 
only  to  avoid  mistakes,  but  to  achieve 
successes  and  to  make  money.  That  is 
the  great  value  of  a  careful  study  of  a 
concrete  business  condition,  such  as  Mr. 
Evers  has  made.  It  places  at  the  dis- 
posal of  owners  and  builders  all  over 
the  country  the  fruits  of  a  varied  and 
prolonged  experience  in  watching  the 
success  of  building  operations  and  of  a 
patient  and  exact  study  of  the  causes  of 
success  or  failure. 

Perhaps  the  best  way  to  convey  an 
adequate  idea  of  the  scope  and  value  of 
the  book  will  be  to  enumerate  some  of 
the  topics  which  Mr.  Evers  discusses. 
The  first  four  chapters  are  occupied  with 
an  examination  of  the  more  general  as- 
pects of  the  subject.  Mr.  Evers  dwells 
upon  the  rapid  growth  of  cities,  of  the 
increased  variety  and  complexity  of  the 
types  of  buildings  needed  in  a  modern 
city,  and  the  conditions  under  which  the 
ordinary  demand  is  met.  He  separates 
the  commercial  problem  involved  by  ur- 
ban building  into  two  parts.  One  of  these 
concerns  the  real  estate  problem,  includ- 
ing the  study  of  the  site,  its  surroundings, 
.accessibility,  and  in  general  all  the  ex- 
terior factors.  The  other  concerns  the 
building  proper,  including  the  cost,  the 
number  of  stories,  the  size,  the  planning, 
the  elevator  equipment,  and1  in  general  all 


the  interior  factors,  which  determine  suc- 
cess or  failure. 

The  larger  part  of  the  book  is  naturally 
occupied  with  a  discussion  of  the  interior 
factors.  Not  that  the  interior  factors 
are  more  important  than  the  exterior 
ones,  but  they  are  more  numerous,  more 
complex  and  on  the  whole  not  so  well 
understood.  In  the  chapter  devoted  to 
the  exterior  factors  he  discusses,  how- 
ever, such  matters  as  accessibility,  ap- 
proach, transportation,  topography,  street 
plan,  shape  and  size  of  building  lots,  the 
comparative  value  of  corner  and  inside 
lots,  paving,  the  width  of  streets,  nuis- 
ances, restrictions,  taxation  and  other  ar- 
tificial interferences  with  natural  tenden- 
cies. The  end  of  this  chapter  contains  an 
admirable  summary  in  which  the  benefi- 
cial and  detrimental  exterior  influences 
upon  each  class  of  building  are  classified 
and  placed  in  parallel  columns. 

Mr.  Evers'  investigation  into  the  inter- 
nal factors  is  equally  exhaustive  and  help- 
ful. He  discusses  in  the  first  place  the 
structural  problem  in  its  general  aspect 
and  insists  upon  the  importance  of  har- 
monizing a  building  with  its  surroundings 
and  of  making  its  cost  proportionate  to 
that  of  the  land.  He  goes  exhaustively 
into  the  requirements  in  the  way  of  good 
planning,  light  and  air,  convenience  and 
the  like,  which  all  buildings  need,  no  mat- 
ter whether  they  are  devoted  to  business 
or  residential  purposes.  Then  he  takes 
up  the  special  requirements  which  differ- 
ent classes  of  buildings  have  to  meet. 
He  discusses  in  turn  private  residences, 
two-family  houses,  business  buildings  in 
general,  and  retail  stores  in  particular. 
Finally  he  goes  exhaustively  into  the 
structural  life  of  different  classes  of 
buildings,  how  fast  they  depreciate,  how 
they  can  be  most  economically  maintained 
and  operated.  All  the  points  which  Mr. 
Evers  makes  are  driven  home  by  numer- 
ous examples.  The  book  abounds  in  use- 
ful facts  and  illuminating  figures.  Over 
sixty  illustrations  are  published,  showing 
instances  of  good  and  bad  plans,  success- 
ful and  unsuccessful  buildings. 

H.  C. 


NOTES 
AND 
MMENTS 


The  White  Plains  sta- 
tion   of    the    New    York 
Tapestry  Brick  Central    Railroad    which 
in  a  Large        was  °Pened  a  few  weeks 

Composition.       a£°  is  one  of  the  most 
interesting    examples    of 

the  use  of  what  has  come 
to  be  known  as  "tapes- 
try" brick  in  the  neighborhood  of  New 
York.  Both  inside  and  out,  this  material 
has  been  employed  for  the  wall  surfaces. 
The  architectural  scheme  of  this  building 
is  big,  but  simple  in  the  extreme,  the  detail 
being  confined  almost  entirely  to  the  pat- 
tern and  texture  variations  of  the  brick, 
which  are  cleverly  done.  The  wide  frieze 
under  the  main  cornice  is  of  especial  inter- 
est. The  building  impresses  one  as  being 
adequate  and  absolutely  permanent  and  of 
distinct  architectural  merit. 


At     Our     request     Mr. 
Louis  Carter  Baker,  Jr., 
An  Authentic        who    designed    the    very 
Restoration  of       interesting       restoration 
a  Fine  Old          of  Pencoyd,  the  historic 
Residence.          home     of     the     Roberts 
family    at    Bala,     Mont- 
gomery      County,       Pa., 
shown   on  pages   370   to  373,  has  prepared 
the  following  note: 

"About  a  year  and  a  half  ago  I  was  em- 
ployed by  the  present  owner  to  restore  the 
house,  and  alter  it  as  far  as  possible  to  con- 
form to  the  original  lines.  In  this  connec- 
tion it  is  interesting  to  note  that  Pencoyd 
is  said  to  be  the  oldest  house  in  Philadel- 
phia or  Montgomery  counties.  It  is  of  the 
early  Pennsylvania  Dutch  type,  built 
of  field  stones,  laid  in  rubble  masonry,  with 
many  flint  stones  in  the  wall,  which  varies 
from  two  feet  to  sixteen  inches.  The  char- 
acter of  the  workmanship  and  of  the  mortar 
in  the  walls  also  varied  considerably.  Look- 
outs or  peep-holes  were  found  in  the  old 
walls,  from  which  it  is  supposed  the  hostile 
Indians  were  observed  and  fired  at.  I  also 


found  in  the  middle  of  the  walls  several 
hewn  blocks  of  cherry  wood;  for  what  pur- 
pose they  were  inserted  in  the  walls,  I  was 
not  able  accurately  to  determine. 

"It  was  built  in  1683  by  John  Roberts, 
who  was  the  first  settler  in  that  section. 
He  came  from  Wales',  and  procured  his 
grant  of  about  250  acres  of  land  from 
William  Penn,  in  England,  before  sailing. 
His  original  account  of  his  coming  and 
settling  here,  and  of  his  naming  the  place 
Pencoyd  (originally  spelled  Pencoid)  is 
now  in  the  family  possession.  The  place 
has  passed  by  will  from  father  to  son,  since 
1683,  without  a  break  or  deed,  and  the  pres- 
ent owner  is  the  eighth  generation  to  live 
in  it. 

"The  house  has  been  changed  many 
times,  each  generation,  so  far  as  I  was  able 
to  observe,  making  some  changes;  but  the 
original  house,  about  forty  feet  by  twenty- 
eight  feet,  has  always  remained,  with  the 
original  oak  rafters,  joists,  etc.  There  is 
no  account  of,  nor  can  any  of  the  family 
remember,  whether  the  window  frames'  and 
sash  have  ever  been  changed  from  the  orig- 
inal, but  their  present  size  and  design  would 
indicate  that  at  some  time  new  window 
frames  were  placed  in  the  old  walls. 

"When  I  took  hold  of  the  house  it  was 
a  conglomerate  mass  of  alterations  and  ad- 
ditions, some  of  them  extensive  and  costly, 
especially  those  added  by  the  late  George 
B.  Roberts,  president  of  the  Pennsylvania 
Railroad,  but  they  were  all  torn  down,  and 
the  original  walls  simply  lengthened,  as  is 
shown  in  the  photograph.  The  old  kitchen 
fireplace  was  uncovered  and  repaired  (see 
page  373).  The  old  kitchen  is  now  a  living 
room. 

"Pencoyd  is  notable  among  Philadelphia's 
country  homes,  because  of  its  age,  its 
unique  and  attractive  setting,  and  because 
it  has  been  the  home  of  a  notable  family, 
without  a  break,  for  eight  generations. 
Penn  Cottage,  at  Wynnewood,  built  in  1693, 
is  the  next  oldest  house  in  the  vicinity;  the 


384 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


old  Merion  Meeting  House,  another  ancient 
structure,  having  been   built  in   1695." 

In  fitting  up  the  new  interior,  floor 
boards,  trims,  doors,  mantels,  hardware, 
and  the  like,  taken  from  old  houses  through- 
out the  country,  suitable  and  proper  for  this 
purpose,  were  procured.  The  interior  there- 
fore represents,  as  far  as  possible,  and  as 
far  as  conformable  with  modern  uses,  an 
accurate  and  veritable  reproduction. 


Glass 
Houses. 


The  Berliner  Bauwelt 
publishes  an  account  of 
the  glass  houses  of  the 
future  by  Paul  Sheer- 
bart.  On  the  assump- 
tion that  with  the  ex- 
ception of  air,  light  is 
the  most  important 
agent  toward  happiness  and  health,  Herr 
Sheerbart  prophesies  that  wood,  stone, 
brick  and  other  recognized  materials  of 
these  many  centuries  will  play  no  part  in 
the  houses  of  the  future.  An  absolutely 
sanitary  structure  of  glass,  doubled  for 
warmth,  will  be  supported  upon  an  iron 
skeleton  or  framework,  the  latter  of  course 
the  contribution  of  the  present  building  age 
and  already  fully  understood.  At  the  Co- 
logne Exposition,  the  architect  Bruno 
Traut  erected  a  glass  building,  the  first 
conscious  exemplification  of  the  new  struc- 
tural creed. 


The  selection   of  Dan- 
iel C.  French  as  sculptor 
The  for  the  statue  of  Lincoln 

Lincoln  to  be  placed  in  the  Lin- 

of  the  coin     Memorial     at     the 

People.  foot     of     the     Mall     in 

Washington  is  a  logical 
one.  Mr.  French  un- 
doubtedly stands  in  general  estimation  at 
the  head  of  the  American  sculptors  of  to- 
day. The  selection,  while  it  presents  the 
greatest  possible  opportunity  for  an  Ameri- 
can sculptor,  at  the  same  time  carries  with 
it  a  tremendous  responsibility.  The  nation 
will  demand  that  this  figure  of  Lincoln 
shall  embody  those  great  traits  which  it 
most  admired  in  the  man.  Mr.  French's 
Lincoln  of  the  Nebraska  State  Capitol  will 
riot  do,  beautiful  and  appealing  as  it  is.  I 
have  seen  a  great  room  full  of  people  stand 
hushed  in  awe  before  the  pathos  of  that 
figure,  but  it  is  not  pathos  that  must  be 
the  characteristic  of  the  Lincoln  of  the 
Washington  Memorial.  It  should  have 
something  of  that,  but  it  should  have  above 
and  beyond  more  of  the  iron  character  of 


the  man  who  stood  firm  and  undismayed 
through  the  storm  and  stress  of  the  Civil 
War;  it  must  have  the  loftiness  of  that 
character  that  towered  clear  above  the 
calumny  and  opposition  of  enemies  at 
home,  and  the  keensightedness  which  saw 
through  all  sham  and  beyond  the  clouds  of 
doubt  and  disappointment  into  the  clear 
future  of  this  great  land;  and,  withal,  it 
must  have  something  of  the  keen  humor 
and  the  kindliness  which  endeared  him  to 
small  and  great.  If  Mr.  French  produces 
the  Lincoln  that  the  people  have  set  up 
in  their  hearts,  great  will  be  the  glory  of 
it,  but  it  is  a  task  which  should  be  entered 
upon  with  fasting  and  prayer. 

Electus    D.    Litchfield. 


The     erection     of     the 
great    athletic    stadia    at 
The   Yale    Bowl    New  Haven  and  Prince- 
and  the  ton    is    not    among    the 

Palmer  least     notable     architec- 

Stadium.  tural      achievements      of 

the  past  year.  It  is 
quite  probable  that  some 
future  archaeologist  in  studying  the  archi- 
tectural remains  of  the  present  period  of 
American  architecture  will  consider  these 
great  amphitheatres  for  athletic  games  as 
among  the  most  interesting  products  of 
our  time.  The  Yale  Bowl  is  a  more  fin- 
ished architectural  design  than  the  Palmer 
Stadium.  Architecturally,  the  latter  does 
not  seem  wholly  satisfying,  though  in  some 
respects  it  has  advantages  over  the  Yale 
Bowl.  One  has  a  little  of  the  feeling  that 
one  wishes  it  were  a  little  bit  more  Gothic, 
more  Roman,  or,  frankly,  more  American 
of  the  year  1914.  On  the  other  hand,  rein- 
forced concrete  does  not  lend  itself  very 
readily  to  Gothic  architecture,  and  one  can 
readily  understand  the  difficulty  of  produc- 
ing a  structure  of  this  nature  which  would 
he  in  keeping  with  the  delightful  Collegiate 
Gothic  of  the  Princeton  University  build- 
ings. From  the  spectator's  point  of  view, 
the  Palmer  Stadium  has  a  definite  advan- 
tage over  the  Bowl,  in  that,  owing  to  its 
shape,  it  is  possible  to  bring  the  seats 
closely  to  the  side  lines  of  the  football 
field.  The  same  result  is  also  obtained  by 
making  the  ranges  steeper.  Then,  too, 
there  is  something  very  delightful  in  hav- 
ing the  horseshoe  open  out  to  the  sun  and 
to  the  very  beautiful  view  to  the  south. 
One  cannot  help  but  being  impressed  after 
seeing  these  splendid  structures  with  the 
feeling  that  at  last  we  have  decided  to 
build  not  for  today  but  for  all  time. 


1 


s** 


j        Jf 


?UJ 


•v 


>  C*^1 


is.'/ 


••• 


%2ii 
Hi 


I 


RECORD  May 

1 


A  rOPY  •  PVRT.KHFn  IM 


First  Cost 


You  cannot  afford  to  consider  first  cost  on  an 
item  that  means  protection  and  future  economy. 
Generally  speaking  you  desire  to  get  as  much  for 
your  money  as  possible,  but  don't  you  think  it  is 
false  economy  to  cut  down  on  an  item  that  is  to 
be  a  decoration  and  a  protection  in  one  ? 

The  first  cost  of  hollow  steel  doors  and  trim  is  slightly  higher  than  doors 
and  trim  of  wood. 

If  you  compare  a  ZAHNER  HOLLOW  METAL  DOOR  with  an  ordinary 
wood  door  simply  in  terms  of  steel  and  wood,  assuming  that  all  other 
things  are  equal,  the  additional  expense  appears  to  be  uncalled  for,  but 
if  you  have  your  building  at  heart  and  are  far-sighted  you  will  easily  see: 

that  HOLLOW  METAL  DOORS  AND  TRIM  constructed  by  the 
ZAHNER  METHOD  insure  absolute  fire  safety— they  cannot  burn, 
whereas  wood  doors  in  any  partitions — no  matter  how  well  the  partition 
may  be  fireproofed  will  disappear  in  flames; 

that  doors  finished  by  the  ZAHNER  ENAMELING  PROCESS  have 
a  very  hard  surface,  making  impossible  the  secretion  of  bacteria, 
whereas  in  wood  doors  the  germs  virtually  soak  in.  This  enamel  finish 
is  artistic  and  everlasting  and  requires  no  attention.  Wood  doors  on  the 
other  hand  require  periodical  rubbings,  revarnishing  or  an  entire  refinish; 

that  ZAHNER  HOLLOW  METAL  interiors  reduce  your  insurance,  and, 

that  they  give  every  building  where  installed  an  advertising  feature  that  is 
of  no  small  account  and  create  a  safe  feeling  that  appeals  very  strongly  to 
tenants. 

Every  one  of  the  above  features  should  have  your  attention,  whether  your 
new  building  is  going  to  be  the  means  of  a  disastrous  fire  and  loss  of  life 
or  whether  it  is  going  to  be  a  popular  and  paying  proposition  depends 
largely  on  how  cheap  you  make  your  first  cost. 

Give  the  ZAHNER  AGENT  in  your  City  an  opportunity  to 
show  you  how  a  ZAHNER  installation  pays  regular  div- 
idends— or  gel  in  touch  with  the  home  office  direct. 


THE  ZAHNER  METAL  SASH  &  DOOR  CO. 

Successors  to  the  Monarch  Metal  Manufacturing  Co. 

CANTON,  OHIO 


NHNULIIIIIIIItll 


-  - 


VOL.  XXXVII.     No.  5 


MAY,  1915 


SERIAL  NO.  200 


THE 

'  ARCHITECTVRALM 

sa    RECORD 


CONTEXTS 


COVER-HOUSE  DOOR  AT  OAK  LODGE,  Ardmore,  Pa. : 

Evans  &  Warner,  Architects 
Painting  by  Charles  Lennox  Wright 

EXAMPLES  OF  THE  WORK  OF  OTIS  &  CLARK 

By  Herbert  Groly 

THE  HOUSE  OF  HOPE  PRESBYTERIAN  CHURCH,  St.  Paul,  Minn. 

Cram  j&  Ferguson,  Architects 

ROMAN  ARCHITECTURE  AND  ITS  CRITICS.    Part  I 

By  Prof.  A.  D.  F.  Hamlin,  of  Columbia  University 

COLOR  IN  ARCHITECTURE  AT  THE  PANAMA-PACIFIC  EXPOSITION      437 
By  Wm.  L.  Woollett 

COLONIAL  ARCHITECTURE  IN  CONNECTICUT.    Part  II 


Page 


385 


410 


425 


Text  and  Measured  Drawings  by  Wesley  Sherwood  Bessell 

THE  NEW  GENERAL  HOSPITAL  AT  CINCINNATI 
By  J.  R.  Schmidt 

PORTFOLIO  OF  CURRENT  ARCHITECTURE 

RECENT  BOOKS  ON  MEDIEVAL  ARCHITECTURE.    Part  I 
By  Richard  Franz  Bach 

NOTES  AND  COMMENTS     -  - 


445 


453 


464 


474 


479 


Editor  -.  MICHAEL  A.  MIKKELSEN.  ,  Contributing  Editor :    HERBERT  CROLY 

Advertising  Manager  :    AUSTIN  L.  BLACK 
Yearly  Subscription— United  States  $3.00  Entered   May   22,    1902.    as   Second  Copyright    1915   by  The   Architectural 


— Foreign  $4.00 — Single  Copies   35  cents 


Class    Matter,  at  New  York.    N.  Y. 


Record  Company — AH  Rights  Reserved 


PUBLISHED    MONTHLY    BY 

THE  ARCHITECTURAL  RECORD  COMPANY 


115-119  WEST  FORTIETH  STREET,  NEW  YORK 


F.   W.    DODGE,   President 


F.    T.    MILLER,    Secretary  and  Treasure. 


STAIR    HALL-RESIDENCE    OF    E.    I.    CUDAHY. 
ESQ.,  CHICAGO.     OTIS  &  CLARK,  ARCHITECTS. 


AKC 


ITECTVRAL 


FIECOFID 


MAY,  1915 


VOLVME  XXXVII 


NVMBER  V 


EXAMPLES    OF   THE  WORK 
OF  OTIS   OL,   CLARK 

^  CKO  LY 


A  WELL  known  English  critic  re- 
cently drew  an  interesting  com- 
parison between  the  general  char- 
acteristics of  the  English  literary  move- 
ment of  to-day  and  that  of  the  Victorian 
period.  The  comparison  turned  chiefly  on 
the  absence  of  literary  men  of  exception- 
al ability  in  contemporary  England,  but 
the  presence  of  a  very  high  average  of 
men  of  ability  both  in  respect  to  prose 
and  verse.  England  has  no  novelists  or 
poets  comparable  to  the  great  Victorians, 
but  she  has  an  extraordinarily  large  num- 
ber of  writers  who  are  abler  than  any 
except  the  ablest  of  the  Victorians,  and 
who  maintain  a  high  standard  both  in 
form  and  substance.  Genius  is  lacking, 
but  talent  abounds. 

The  foregoing  generalization  applies, 
it  would  seem,  to  other  occupations  be- 
sides letters  and  to  other  countries  be- 
sides England ;  England  has  no  states- 
men or  orators  who  tower  above  their 


contemporaries  as  did  Gladstone,  Dis- 
raeli and  John  Bright.  She  has  no  scien- 
tists whose  eminence  is  comparable  to 
that  of  Huxley  and  Tyndall.  At  the  same 
time  there  is  certainly  a  larger  amount 
of  hard,  sound  work  accomplished  at  the 
present  time  both  in  politics  and  in  science 
than  there  was  a  generation  ago.  Ger- 
many also  seems  to  lack  both  politicians 
and  generals  who  measured  up  to  the 
standard  of  the  founders  of  the  Empire, 
but  the  lack  of  very  great  men  does  not 
prevent  her  from  putting  into  action 
what  is  apparently  the  most  efficient  ma- 
chine for  fighting  a  war  and  for  amelior- 
ating its  unfortunate  effects  on  her  own 
population  which  the  world  has  ever 
seen. 

These  analogues  are  worth  some  at- 
tention, because  something  of  the  same 
movement  seems  to  be  taking  place  in 
American  architecture.  The  modern  ar- 
chitectural revival  in  this  country  has 


386 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


been  profoundly  influenced  by  the  work 
of  a  few  men  such  as  Hunt,  Richardson, 
McKim,  White  and  Sullivan.  At  the 
present  time  all  but  one  of  these  men 
are  dead  and  he  no  longer  possesses  his 
former  influence.  New  designers  have 
been  developed  of  equal  ability,  but  they 
do  not  stand  out  among  their  contempor- 
aries as  did  the  men  named  above,  and 
they  are  not  copied  to  the  same  extent. 
The  place  of  Richardson  and  McKim 
has  been  taken  by  a  small  army  of  young- 
er architects  of  varying  ability  but  of 
generally  high  standard.  All  over  the 
country  an  extraordinary  amount  of 
clever,  well  considered  and  interesting 
work  is  being  turned  out.  This  work 
frequently  possesses  a  great  deal  of  dis- 
tinction ;  but  it  has  the  distinction  not 
of  originality  or  of  force,  but  of  ease, 
competence  and  good  manners. 

Work  such  as  that  of  Messrs.  Otis  and 
Clark  suggest  the  foregoing  introductory 
remarks.  It  is  sound  and;  intelligent 
work,  which  is  well-informed  without  a 
trace  of  pedantry,  and  which  conforms 
to  conventions  without  being  stiff.  It 
makes  no  pretense  to  originality,  but  its 
want  of  originality  does  not  prevent  it 
from  being  fresh  and  even  lively  in  ap- 
pearance. One  feels  that  the  architects 
are  at  home  in  their  work,  that  they  are 
getting  through  it  without  effort  and  on 
the  whole  without  very  much  friction. 
Twenty  years  ago  the  ability  to  design 
such  houses  as  these,  particularly  in  the 
vicinity  of  Chicago,  would  have  required 
a  large  amount  of  originality,  effort  and 
prestige.  However  much  American  ar- 
chitecture may  lack  men  of  great  indi- 
vidual force,  it  certainly  provides  increas- 


ing opportunities  for  the  achievement  of 
diversified,  agreeable  and  accomplished 
work. 

A  very  simple  and  attractive  design  is 
that  of  the  Indian  Hill  Club,  at  \Vin- 
netka,  111.  It  consists  essentially  of  a 
long,  low  one  and  one-half  story  building 
with  a  peaked  roof,  resembling  an  en- 
larged New  England  farmhouse  ;  but  this 
long  building  has  two  wings  of  the  same 
height,  and  the  space  between  the  wings 
is  enclosed  and  made  a  one-story  hall. 
It  remains  as  unpretentious  as  a  New- 
England  farmhouse  and  it  has  the 
same  sort  of  charm.  If  a  New  England 
farmer  could  have  become  affluent  with- 
out acquiring  social  presumption,  he 
would  have  built  for  himself  this  kind 
of  a  residence.  It  does  not  even  make 
the  comparatively  modern  claims  of  a 
manor  house.  It  belongs  essentially  to 
a  man  who  farms  his  own  land,  who  cul- 
tivates his  own  garden,  and  that  is  the 
kind  of  man  which  an  American  ought 
to  be. 

The  members  of  the  Indian  Hill  Club 
are  to  be  congratulated  upon  having  a 
home  which  has  been  kept  so  completely 
domesticated. 

An  interesting  variation  on  the  same 
general  type  is  the  residence  of  Mr. 
Chas.  M.  Rank-in  at  Terre  Haute,  Ind. 
This  house  consists  of  a  two-story  and 
attic  main  building.  On  the  entrance 
side  this  main  building  is  supplemented 
by  an  extension,  containing  the  kitchen, 
the  servants'  rooms  and  the  garage.  This 
extension  joins  the  body  of  the  house 
at  an  angle,  and  the  plan  has  enabled 
the  architects  to  make  a  very  pleasant  ar- 
rangement for  the  approach  to  the  build- 


FIRST  FLOOR  PLAN-RESIDENCE  OF  E.  I.  CUDAHY,  ESQ.,  CHICAGO. 
Otis  &  Clark,  Architects. 


RESIDENCE     OF     E.     I.     CUDAHY,     ESQ. 
CHICAGO.    OTIS   &  CLARK.   ARCHITECTS. 


s 

5  w 
II 

fc  K 


390 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


FIRST  FLOOR  PLAN-INDIAN  HILL  CLUB,  WINNETKA,  ILL. 
Otis  &  Clark,  Architects. 


FIRST  FLOOR  PLAN-RESIDENCE  OF  F.  H.  SCOTT,  ESQ.,  HUBBARD  WOODS,  ILL. 
Otis  &  Clark,  Architects. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


391 


TERRACE   OVERLOOKING   LAKE   MICHIGAN— RESIDENCE   OF   FREDERICK   H.    SCOTT,    ESQ., 

AT  HUBBARD  WOODS,  ILLINOIS. 
Otis  &  Clark,  Architects. 


ing.  The  arrangement  is  unconventional 
and  effectual,  while  at  the  same  time  be- 
ing compact  and  convenient.  Although 
the  architectural  style  is  not  picturesque, 
the  effect  of  the  design  of  the  entrance 
sjde  is  sufficiently  irregular  to  have  an 
element  of  the  picturesque  in  it,  to  which 
the  low,  one-story  garage,  whose  roof 
runs  into  that  of  the  extension,  .contrib- 
utes very  much.  The  practice  of  incorpor- 
ating the  garage  with  the  design  of  the 
house  is  becoming  more  and  more  popu- 
lar, particularly  in  the  case  of  modest 
suburban  places.  There  is  no  real  need 
of  removing  it  to  a  distance,  as  was 
the  case  with  a  stable. 

On  the  garden  side  of  the  Rankin  place 
the  corner  and  garage  extension  almost 
completely  disappear  from  view.  From 
this  aspect  the  dwelling  looks  like  an 
unusually  large  two-story  farmhouse 
seated  on  a  terrace  and  provided  with  all 
the  modern  conveniences.  It  is  above  all  a 
comfortable  and  homely  kind  of  build- 
ing, but  with  a  homeliness  that  is  not  de- 
void of  refinement  and  good  taste.  What- 
ever else  may  be  said  for  American  ar- 


chitecture, it  is  certainly  creating  a  more 
appropriate  and  interesting  type  of  house 
for  middle  class  people  than  is  the  archi- 
tecture of  any  foreign  country. 

The  most  elaborate  house  designed  by 
Messrs.  Otis  and  Clark  is  the  Thorne 
place,  situated  at  Lake  Forest,  111.  A 
residence  of  this  kind  is  intended  for 
comparatively  wealthy  rather  than  for 
moderately  well-to-do  people,  and  its  de- 
sign is,  consequently,  more  largely  de- 
termined by  the  historical  dwelling  occu- 
pied by  similarly  fortunate  people  of 
other  times  and  countries.  This  par- 
ticular dwelling  is  a  discreet  and  taste- 
ful adaptation  of  a  French  chateau  to 
the  needs  of  a  contemoorary  American 
family.  The  entrance  facade  is  particu- 
larly successful  and  may  partly  be  char- 
acterized as  one  of  the  most  sympathetic 
and  reticent  attempts  which  has  been 
made  in  this  country  to  domesticate  in 
the  United  States  this  particular  style. 
It  is  regular  and  formal  without  being 
stiff,  and  it  is  handsome  and  stylish  with- 
out being  ornate  and  ostentatious ;  above 
all,  the  architects  have  succeeded  in 


fe  W  < 
OHJ 

W     . 

u  d 

^^08 
W  W 
Q 

a**  S3 

w  a  H 


394 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


FIRST  FLOOR  PLAN-RESIDENCE  OF  CHARLES  M.  RANKIN,  ESQ.,  TERRE  HAUTE,  IND. 

Otis  &  Clark,  Architects. 


RESIDENCE  OF  CHARLES  M.  RANKIN,  ESQ.,  TERRE  HAUTE,  IND. 
Otis  &  Clark,  Architects. 


J  W 

.H 


< 


W 

S3  « 

w  o 


w 


Jtf 


400 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


DINING  ROOM— RESIDENCE  OF  JAMES  W.  THORNE,  ESQ.,  LAKE  FOREST,  ILL. 
Otis  &  Clark,  Architects, 


avoiding  the  archaic  appearance  which 
has  been  one  of  the  most  objectionable 
aspects  of  so  many  American  chateaus. 
For  all  its  conformity  to  a  particular 
style,  it  looks  like  a  modern  American 
residence,  though  it  would  be  difficult  to 
say  just  how  the  architects  have  suc- 
ceeded in  giving  this  modern  accent  to 
the  language  of  another  century.  The 
one  blemish  in  the  design  of  this  entrance 
facade  is  the  second  story  windows  in  the 
extension.  They  are  on  the  same  level  as 
the  windows  in  the  main  building,  but, 
inasmuch  as  the  ceilings  are  lower,  they 
have  been  allowed  to  break  through  the 
line  of  the  roof  in  an  extremely  objec- 
tionable way. 

The  other  facade  of  the  Thorne  house, 
is  supplemented  by  a  handsome  terrace, 
which  forms  the  scenic  background  for 
what  is  in  reality  a  private  outdoor 
living  room.  This  facade  is  less  in- 
teresting than  the  entrance  frontage.  The 
architects  were  obliged  to  choose 
between  remaining  true  to  the  type 
or  of  adapting  the  historic  model 
radically  and  frankly  to  modern 
American  needs.  They  quite  prop- 


erly chose  the  latter  course.  Their 
adaptation  amounts  in  this  case  almost 
to  a  transformation.  They  sacrificed  the 
style  to  the  needs  and  wishes  of  the 
people  who  were  to  live  in  the  building. 
The  terrace  frontage  has  little  of  the 
simplicity  and  the  distinction  of  its 
more  public  brother.  It  gives  one 
the  impression  of  being  chiefly  win- 
dows and  awnings,  and  of  course  it  looks 
better  on  days  when  the  awnings  can  be 
rolled  up.  It  remains  true,  none  the  less, 
that  the  French  chateau  style  needs  for 
its  proper  effect  high  unpierced  wall 
space  and  high  repose.  The  terrace  fa- 
cade has  been  designed  to  meet  a  real  need 
for  sunlight  and  other  modern  conveni- 
ences, but  like  so  many  modern  contri- 
vances, it  is  restless  just  because  it  is 
useful,  and  it  lacks  character.  Neither 
does  the  smaller  frontage  look  very  well 
from  the  garden,  which  has  been  laid  out 
to  the  west  of  the  house  in  an  attractive 
background  of  trees.  •,  Here  again  ap- 
pearance has  been  somewhat  sacrificed 
to  convenience.  The  spacious  porch, 
which  leads  to  the  garden,  is  excellent 
in  itself,  but  it  was  difficult  to  place 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


401 


FIRST  FLOOR  PLAN-RESIDENCE  OF  JAMES  W.  THORNE,  ESQ.,  LAKE  FOREST,  ILL. 

Otis  &  Clark,  Architects. 


nnnn 
nnnn 
nnnn 


G   C.  A  5   5         Tp£  D.  R  A  C  L 

n 


FIRST  FLOOR  PLAN-RESIDENCE  OF  WILLIAM  S.  MASON,   ESQ.,   EVANSTON,  ILL. 

Otis   &  Clark,  Architects. 


. 


ENTRANCE-RESIDENCE  OF  WILL- 
IAM S.  MASON,  ESQ.,  EVANSTO.X, 
ILL.  OTIS  &  CLARK,  ARCHITECTS. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL     RECORD. 


RESIDENCE  OF  WILLIAM  S.  MASON,  ESQ.,  EVANSTON,  ILL. 
Otis   &   Clark,   Architects. 


DINING  ROOM-RESIDENCE  OF  WILLIAM  S.   MASON,   ESQ.,  EVANSTON,  ILL. 
Otis  &  Clark,  Architects. 


404 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


VIEW  AND  FIRST  FLOOR  PLAN-RESIDENCE 
OF  JAMES  FENTRESS,  ESQ.,  HUBBARD  WOODS, 
ILL.  OTIS  &•  CLARK.  ARCHITECTS. 


^s 

"*  rt  W 
O  £ 

O  y  (_) 

W  •<  < 
U  iJ     . 

W  ri« 
Qw< 

So w  ri 

w  . .- 


406 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


RESIDENCE  OF  WALTER  R.  KIRK,  ESQ.,  LAKE  FOREST,  ILL. 
Otis  &  Clark,  Architects. 


FIRST  FLOOR  PLAN-RESIDENCE  OF  WALTER  R.  KIRK,  ESQ.,  LAKE  FOREST.  ILL. 

Otis   &   Clark,   Architects. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


407 


LIVING  ROOM— RESIDENCE  OF  WALTER  R.  KIRK,  ESQ.,  LAKE  FOREST,  ILL. 
Otis   &  Clark,  Architects. 


DINING  ROOM— RESIDENCE  OF  WALTER  R.  KIRK,  ESQ.,  LAKE  FOREST,  ILL. 
Otis  &  Clark,  Architects. 


fc-5 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


409 


against  the  background  of  the  body  of 
the  house  and  make  it  look  well.  A  great 
deal  of  careful  and  successful  study  has 
been  devoted  to  the  interior  of  this  house. 
The  entrance  hall  and  the  dining  room 
are  particularly  good  examples  of  the 
simpler  type  of  French  panelled  room. 

Another  of  Messrs.  Otis  and  Clark's 
dwellings  which  belongs  emphatically  to 
an  historic  type  is  the  home  of  Walter 
R.  Kirk,  at  Lake  Forest,  111.  This  house 
is,  of  course,  scrupulously  and  even 
somewhat  consciously  Spanish  in  its  ap- 
pearance. Its  Spanish  character  is  un- 
fortunately attenuated  by  the  multiplic- 
ity of  its  windows,  which  has  prevented 
the  architects  from  obtaining  the  un- 
broken stretches  of  wall  surface  which 
added  so  much  to  the  severe  dignity  of 
Spanish  domestic  architecture.  But  it  is 
none  the  less  a  very  interesting  example 
of  the  application  of  Spanish  forms  to 
the  needs  of  a  modern  American  family. 
Spanish  buildings  usually  managed  to 
combine  picturesqueness  with  great  sim- 
plicity in  the  composition  of  a  building 
and  in  the  massing  of  its  parts.  The 
Kirk  house  also  is  low;  simple  as  the 
elements  of  its  composition  and  almost 
devoid  of  ornament.  Yet  it  is  at  the 
same  time  picturesque;  and  its  pictur- 
esqueness is  obtained  almost  entirely  by 
the  projection  of  the  roof.  The  effect  of 
a  deep  shadow  of  this  kind  is  analogous 
to  the  effect  upon  a  man's  face  produced 
by  a  broad-brimmed  hat.  If  it  is  done 
skillfully,  it  adds  an  element  of  mystery 
to  what  is  in  other  respects  a  wholly  un- 
mysterious  facade  of  countenance.  Was 
it  accidental  that  the  Spaniard  should 
have  used  more  than  any  other  people 
both  the  sombrero  with  its  broad  brim 
and  the  shapely  projecting  roof? 

The  rooms  of  the  Kirk  house  will 
make  a  particularly  strong  appeal  to 
people  who  like  extreme  simplicity  of  in- 
terior design.  The  living  room,  for  in- 


stance, is  entirely  devoid  of  ornament 
except  a  mantelpiece  and  cornice.  It  is 
merely  a  spacious  room,  finished  in  grey 
plaster,  hung  with  tapestries  and  entirely 
free  from  incidental  and  "spotty" 
furnishings.  It  would  be  too  severe  for 
the  ordinary  American  taste,  which  pre- 
fers a  much  busier  and  fussier  kind  of 
decorative  finish,  but  its  severity,  in  spite 
of  a  flavor  of  sub-consciousness,  is  not 
in  the  least  ascetic.  These  bare  Span- 
ish rooms  are  refreshing  in  their  cool- 
ness, their  economy  and  in  their  absence 
of  ornamental  trivialities. 

Messrs.  Otis  and  Clark  have  de- 
signed many  other  attractive  houses,  of 
which  perhaps  the  most  interesting  is 
that  of  John  A.  Jameson  at  Hubbard 
Woods,  111.  It  affords  an  indication  of 
their  versatility,  for  it  is  a  peculiarly  suc- 
cessful example  of  the  half-timbered 
house,  which  frequently  looks  particular- 
ly well  among  the  oak  woods  to  the  north 
of  Chicago.  Mention  should  also  be 
made  of  the  residence  of  Mr.  William  T. 
Mason  at  Evanston,  111.,  which  belongs 
to  a  kind  entirely  different  from  that  of 
the  Jameson  or  Kirk  houses,  but  which 
is  also  extremely  good  of  its  kind.  The 
cleverness  of  architects  who  can  handle 
so  many  different  styles  with  so  much 
taste  and  with  such  a  nice  sense  of  the 
idiom  of  each  particular  style  is  incon- 
testable. It  is  to  be  hoped,  however,  that 
soon  they  will  settle  down  and  special- 
ize in  a  particular  type  of  design.  The 
biggest  successes  in  American  architec- 
ture have  been  made  by  firms  whose 
work  was  characterized  less  by  versatil- 
ity than  by  the  mastery  of  one  particular 
style,  which  can  only  be  derived  by  pa- 
tient and  varied  experimentation  with 
its  possibilities.  Messrs.  Otis  and  Clark 
are  sufficiently  able  to  make  their  friends 
hope  that  eventually  they  will  settle  down 
and  bestow  on  their  work  a  more  strong- 
ly marked  character. 


mm.     • 


THE  HOUSE  OF  HOPE  PRESBYTE- 
RIAN CHURCH,  ST.  PAUL.  MINN. 
CRAM  &  FERGUSON.  ARCHITECTS. 


THE  House  of  Hope  Church  was 
one  of  the  first  churches  founded 
in  St.  Paul,  its  traditions  extend- 
ing back  to  the  beginnings  of  the  State 
of  Minnesota,  in  the  last  century.  The 
original  House  of  Hope  was  a  Dutch 
redoubt  built  in  early  Colonial  times 
on  the  trade  route  between  Hartford  and 
Manhattan  as  a  sort  of  halfway  house 
for  protection  against  the  red  savages  of 
Connecticut.  The  founder  of  the  church 
knew  of  this  old  fort,  and  when  he  gath- 
ered his  small  congregation  in  what  was 
then  an  Indian-beset  wilderness,  his 
church  seemed  to  him  like  the  old  ref- 
uge house  in  the  East,  and  he  called  it 
the  House  of  Hope.  An  edifice  in  the 
lower  town  served  the  congregation  until 
the  dedication  of  the  new  building  in  the 
higher  part  of  the  city,  on  the  bluff  above 
the  Mississippi. 

In  consulting  their  architects  the  build- 
ing committee  laid  down  the  principle 
that,  while  the  church  was  to  be  as  con- 
venient and  practically  useful  as  possi- 
ble, it  nevertheless  was  to  be  traditional 
in  spirit  and  dignified  and  religious  in 
expression.  They  thought  a  three-aisled 
plan  preferable  on  this  account ;  and  it 
may  be  remarked  that,  although  the  aisle 
is  not  merely  an  ambulatory,  but  con- 
tains pews,  the  number  of  dark  seats  is 
small.  There  is  the  usual  front  vesti- 
bule, with  a  gallery  over  it  entered  by 
stairs  from  the  church.  The  two  tran- 
septs have  no  galleries  ;  the  left  is  formed 
in  the  base  of  the  tower,  and  only  the 
right  transept  is  visible  as  such  from  the 
outside.  Back  of  the  church  proper  is 
a  small  chapel  for  small  services,  and 
adjacent,  at  one  side,  are  the  Sunday 
School  building  and  Parish  House. 

The  "system"  adopted  in  the  nave  is 
a  sort  of  compromise  between  the  usual 


wide  one-aisle  interior  with  a  hammer- 
beam  roof  and  the  ordinary  three-aisle 
type  without  a  clerestory.  The  crucial 
difficulty  in  a  wide  span  like  that  of  the 
House  of  Hope  is  in  getting  a  proper 
curve  for  the  arches  of  the  roof  trusses 
without  unduly  raising  the  height  of  the 
roof  or  unduly  depressing  the  arch.  This 
is  here  accomplished  by  springing  the 
truss  arches,  not  from  the  top,  but  from 
the  base  of  the  triforium  above  the 
ground  story  arcade.  The  added  height 
makes  possible  a  simple  type  of  roof 
truss  without  hammer  beams.  The  dark 
triforium  is  extremely  effective  and  use- 
ful acoustically.  True  flying  buttresses 
of  concrete,  under  the  roof,  stiffen  the 
wall  on  centers  of  the  trusses.  The  roof 
of  the  chancel  is  a  pointed  segmental 
barrel  vault,  ribbed  and  panelled.  The 
aisle  ceilings  are  reinforced  concrete  slabs 
with  stone  arches  on  the  lines  of  the 
columns. 

The  stone  used  throughout  is  Bedford 
limestone.  All  the  trim,  exterior  and  in- 
terior, is  light  buff  stone,  and  the  ex- 
terior ashlar  is  buff  and  blue  mixed.  The 
exterior  walls  are  very  good  on  account 
of  the  variety  in  color  made  by  the  use 
of  the  two  grades  of  stone.  All  the  tra- 
cery is  stone,  rebated  for  double  glass  on 
account  of  extremely  cold  winter 
weather..  In  the  exterior  of  the  large 
Parish  House  chimney  some  red  brick 
are  used  to  give  color  variety  to  the  plain 
mass.  The  roofs  are  of  green  slate. 

In  the  interior  of  the  church  the  floors 
of  the  vestibule,  aisles  and  chancel  are 
of  specially  made  tile.  Except  in  the 
chancel,  the  quarries  are  largely  plain  red 
with  semi-glaze  tiles  in  color,  used  in 
spots  and  borders.  In  the  chancel  the 
whole  floor  is  glazed  and  is  very  beauti- 
ful. The  color  of  the  ground  tile  is  dull 


412 


THE  ARCHITECTURAL  RECORD. 


THE  HOUSE  OF  HOPE 
PRESBYTERIAN  CHURCH. 
ST.  PAUL,  MINN.  CRAM  & 
FERGUSON,  ARCHITECTS. 


yellow,  with  blue,  gold  and  iridescent  me- 
tallic glazes  in  the  figured  spots. 

The  woodwork  is  of  fumed  oak  with 
a  dull  and  rather  light  finish.  In  the 
panelling  at  the  back  of  the  chancel  are 
set  five  large  panels  of  brocade,  which 


give  an  effective  focus  to  the  whole  in- 
terior. The  arrangement  of  this  chancel 
reverts  to  older  Scotch  precedent,  and  is 
unlike  that  in  many  Presbyterian 
churches.  The  pulpit  and  lectern  are  at 
the  sides,  with  the  communion  table  in 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


413 


the  center  and  clergy  stalls  behind  it. 
There  are  lateral  benches  for  the  choir 
and  organist;  the  organ  console  is  in  a 
shallow  niche  in  the  wall  on  the  pulpit 
side.  In  the  desks  for  the  pulpit  and 
lectern  are  concealed  transmitters  for 
a  telephone  system  for  deaf  parishioners. 

The  lighting  fixtures  of  the  church 
proper  are  perhaps  the  most  unusual  fea- 
tures of  the  whole  group.  The  motive 
was  suggested  by  the  name  of  the  church. 
Man's  "House  of  Hope"  is  the  church, 
the  Light  of  the  World;  in  the  fixtures 
the  general  forms  were  suggested  by 
the  images  used  in  Revelation  and  else- 
where, where  the  New  Jerusalem  is  seen 
by  St.  John  in  the  form  of  a  fortified 
city,  and  the  companies  of  the  Faithful 
throughout  the  world  are  conceived  of  as 
being  in  3  continual  state  of  siege  by  the 
world  at  large.  The  motives  are  there- 
fore taken  from  mediaeval  architecture, 
civil  and  religious.  The  lantern  at  the 
main  entrance  of  the  church,  the  vesti- 
bule fixtures  and  the  wall  brackets  are 
in  the  form  of  small  defensive  fortifi- 
cations, typifying  the  small  bands  of 
faithful  people  who  throughout  the 
world  in  different  ways  are  sustaining 
their  part  in  the  conflict.  The  nave  fix- 
tures, in  the  shape  of  small  churches, 
represent  the*  Visible  Church  in  the 
world,  divided,  but  united  by  one  mis- 
sion. The  large  corona  at  the  crossing 
is  a  symbol  of  the  Church  Triumphant, 
the  Holy  City,  the  New  Jerusalem.  It  is 
a  temple  encircled  by  a  wall  which  is 
pierced  by  twelve  gates,  typifying  the 
twelve  tribes  of  Israel  of  the  old  dispen- 
sation and  the  twelve  Apostles  of  the 
new.  The  symbols  of  the  Apostles  are 
placed  on  the  shields  hung  from  the  gates 
and  above  the  temple  are  the  dove  and 
two  crowns  hanging,  symbolizing  the 
Trinity. 

As  to  the  actual  fixtures,  the  most  im- 
portant are  of  course  the  nave  chande- 
liers and  the  corona.  In  the  former, 
which  are  hung  low,  it  was  necessary  to 
avoid  the  possibility  of  direct  light  shin- 
ing into  the  eyes  of  the  congregation. 
The  lighting  bulbs  have  been  placed 
above  glass,  which  diffuses  the  light 
and  prevents  concentration  below  the 


fixture.  The  openings  in  the  sides  of 
the  fixture  are  glazed  with  bits  of  col- 
ored glass  which  give  a  most  interest- 
ing effect  of  color  when  the  lights  are 
lighted.  The  corona  is  hung  much 
higher,  with  all  the  lights  exposed.  The 
fixtures  are  hand  wrought  iron  through- 
out, decorated  in  gold  and  color. 

All  the  carving  and  other  ornament  in 
the  church  was  designed  to  have  its  prop- 
er symbolic  relation  to  Christian  and  lo- 
cal tradition.  The  anchor  of  hope,  again 
referring  to  the  name  of  the  church,  and 
the  sword  of  St.  Paul,  the  quasi-patron 
saint  of  the  city,  are  constantly  used. 
In  the  vestibule  are  four  shields,  typify- 
ing in  the  arms  of  their  native  cities  the 
four  great  Protestant  reformers,  Edin- 
burg  for  Knox,  Geneva  for  Calvin,  Zu- 
rich for  Zwingli,  and  Wittenberg  for  Lu- 
ther. The  corbels  under  the  nave  trusses 
are  carved  with  scenes  from  the  life  of 
St.  Paul ;  the  chancel  arch  is  carved  with 
a  vine  pattern,  representing  the  human 
family.  Among  its  roots  at  one  side  are 
the  Creation  of  Man,  at  the  other  the 
Birth  of  Christ,  thus  representing  man 
begun  in  Adam  and  perfected  in  Christ. 
The  chancel  ceiling  is  painted  and  gilt, 
the  shields  bearing  the  arms  of  the 
United  States,  Scotland,  Connecticut  and 
St.  Paul.  Besides  these  are  used  the 
star,  the  crown  of  thorns,  the  rose  and 
the  triangle. 

A  considerable  amount  of  permanent 
stained  glass  has  been  already  installed. 
The  subjects  for  all  the  windows  were 
decided  on  beforehand,  and  laid  out  ac- 
cording to  the  traditional  scheme.  On 
the  left  side  of  the  nave  will  be  the  Old 
Testament  stories,  on  the  right  New 
Testament,  in  the  right  transept  pre- 
Reformation,  and  in  the  left  post-Ref- 
ormation worthies.  The  great  chancel 
window  is  composed  of  scenes  from  the 
Passion,  and  the  window  over  the  main 
entrance  will  show  the  Apocalypse.  The 
chancel  window,  the  right  transept  win- 
dows and  the  three  aisle  windows  are 
already  in  place ;  if  the  standard  of  these 
is  maintained  in  future  gifts,  the  glass 
in  this  church  promises  to  be  noteworthy 
as  an  example  of  the  best  work  of  Ameri- 
can designers. 


EAST  SIDE  OF  NAVE-THE  HOUSE  OF  HOPE 
PRESBYTERIAN  CHURCH,  ST.  PAUL,  MINN. 
CRAM  .  &  FERGUSON,  ARCHITECTS. 


EAST  SIDE  OF  NAVE— THE  HOUSE  OF  HOPE 
PRESBYTERIAN  CHURCH,  ST.  PAUL,  MINN. 
CRAM  &  FERGUSON.  ARCHITECTS. 


CHANCEL  -  THE  HOUSE  OF  HOPE 
PRESBYTERIAN  CHURCH,  ST.  PAUL, 
MINN.  CRAM  &  FERGUSON,  ARCHITECTS. 


f'1. 


NAVE  AND  CHANCEL-THE  HOUSE  OF 
HOPE  PRESBYTERIAN  CHURCH,  ST.  PAUL, 
MINN.  CRAM  &  FERGUSON,  ARCHITECTS. 


REAR  OF  NAVE,  SHOWING  EAST  STAIRS  TO  GALLERY 
-THE  HOUSE  OF  HOPE  PRESBYTERIAN  CHURCH, 
ST.  PAUL,  MINN.  CRAM  &  FERGUSON,  ARCHITECTS. 


EAST  TRANSEPT,  FROM  CHANCEL— THE  HOUSE 
OF  HOPE  PRESBYTERIAN  CHURCH,  ST.  PAUL, 
MINN.  CRAM  &  FERGUSON,  ARCHITECTS. 


ELIZABETH  CHAPEL  —  THE  HOUSE  OF 
HOPE  PRESBYTERIAN  CHURCH,  ST.  PAUL. 
MINN.  CRAM  &  FERGUSON.  ARCHITECTS. 


ROMAN   ARCHITECTVRE 
AND    ITS    CRITICS 

^TA.D.F.HAMLIN 

PART  \-me  CRITICS  tf   She  INDICTMENT 


THE  increase  in  the  output  of  archi- 
tectural books  in  English  within 
the  last  few  years  has  been  ac- 
companied by  a  general  broadening  of 
taste,  both  in  the  public  and  in  those 
who  write  for  its  instruction.  Dogmatic 
criticism  and  narrow  partisanship  in  the 
discussion  of  styles  and  periods  are  less 
conspicuous  than  formerly ;  there  is  more 
catholicity  of  appreciation,  and  critical 
judgments  are  founded  upon  a  better  un- 
derstanding of  the  fundamentals  of  archi- 
tecture and  a  fuller  knowledge  of  its  his- 
tory. There  are,  however,  certain  dog- 
mas of  the  old-time  criticism  which  have 
persisted  in  the  face  of  larger  knowledge, 
which  are  so  erroneous,  so  contrary  to 
the  evidence  of  the  monuments  them- 
selves, that  they  deserve  to  be  examined 
with  great  care,  in  order  that  the  reader 
may  understand  both  why  they  are  so 
plausible  and  persistent,  and  what  are 
the  errors  which  vitiate  them.  It  is  high 
time  that  both  writers  and  readers  should 
be  put  on  their  guard  against  perpetuat- 
ing these  errors. 

It  is  worth  noting  that  much  of  this 
popular  literature  on  architecture  has 
been  the  work,  not  of  practising  archi- 
tects, but  of  studious  laymen.  Ruskin, 
whose  "Seven  Lamps  of  Architecture" 
and  "Stones  of  Venice"  have  been  more 
widely  read  than  any  other  books  on 
architecture  in  English,  was  a  painter,  a 
professor  of  art  and  a  literary  man,  never 
an  architect  either  by  training  or  practice. 
Sir  James  Fergusson,  whose  "History  of 
Architecture  in  All  Countries"  was  for 
many  years  the  only  important  work  in 
English  on  the  subject,  was  an  accom- 
plished scholar  and  traveler,  but  not  a 
practicing  architect  except  for  one  short 
period  early  in  his  career,  during  which 
he  produced  no  work  of  any  importance. 


Among  present-day  writers  Mr.  Charles 
Herbert  Moore,  the  author  of  "Develop- 
ment and  Character  of  Gothic  Architec- 
ture," "The  Character  of  Renaissance 
Architecture,"  and  "Mediaeval  Church 
Architecture  of  England,"  was  for  many 
years  Professor  of  Drawing  at  Harvard 
University;  an  enthusiastic  student  of 
medieval  architecture  and  a  writer  and  il- 
lustrator of  more  than  ordinary  force  and 
ability,  but  not  an  architect.  The  late 
Montgomery  Schuyler,  author  of  "Amer- 
ican Architecture" ;  Mr.  Arthur  Kingsley 
Porter,  author  of  two  large  volumes  on 
"Medieval  Architecture,"  and  of  a  valu- 
able little  book  on  "Vaulting" ;  and  Pro- 
fessor W.  H.  Goodyear,  author  of  "Greek 
Refinements"  and  of  many  articles  in  the 
architectural  periodicals,  have  distin- 
guished themselves  in  various  fields  of 
scholarly  investigation  connected  with 
architecture,  but  none  of  them  is  an  archi- 
tect. Even  the  most  widely  known  of 
American  writers  on  architecture,  the  late 
Mr.  Russell  Sturgis,  although  trained  for 
the  profession  and  known  as  the  designer 
of  the  Marquand  Chapel  at  Yale  and  of  a 
few  other  buildings,  was  always  by  pref- 
erence a  student  and  dilletante  in  his  pro- 
fession rather  than  an  active  practitioner. 
It  would  be  unreasonable  to  claim  that 
none  but  practising  architects  should  at- 
tempt to  write  about  architecture,  that 
they  alone  are  qualified  to  criticize  archi- 
tecture. There  is  a  wide  field  of  literary 
activity  open  to  non-practising  students 
of  architecture,  and  within  certain  fairly 
broad  limits  the  layman  may  qualify  him- 
self, by  study  and  observation,  not  only 
to  popularize  the  history  and  archeology 
of  the  arts  of  building,  and  the  funda- 
mental principles  on  which  they  are  based, 
but  also  to  pronounce  critical  judgments 
on  buildings  and  styles.  One  of  the  best 


426 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


books  on  English  Cathedrals  is  the  work 
of  a  non-professional — an  American  lady, 
Mrs.  M.  G.  Van  Rensselaer.  Neverthe- 
less, in  this  field  the  amateur  stands  on 
somewhat  dangerous  ground.  Every 
one,  of  course,  can  express  his  own  per- 
sonal judgment  of  a  building  or  style. 
But  when  he  addresses  the  general  pub- 
lic— and  all  the  more  if  he  speak  with  a 
certain  authority  based  upon  his  reputa- 
tion as  a  writer  or  scholar — any  mistake 
he  may  make  in  his  verdicts  is  disastrous 
in  its  effects  precisely  in  proportion  to 
that  reputation.  The  error  is  popular- 
ized and  accepted,  and  unless  controvert- 
ed by  some  one  who  can  speak  to  the  same 
audience  with  equal  authority,  it  becomes 
in  time  a  part  of  the  established  traditions 
of  popular  taste  and  judgment.  This  ex- 
plains the  wide  currency  of  the  miscon- 
ceptions and  mis  judgments  to  which  these 
papers  will  seek  to  call  attention. 

The  reason  why  even  the  scholarly 
amateur  or  the  accomplished  dilletante 
is  in  constant  danger  of  critical  misjudg- 
ments,  lies  in  the  fact  that  one  entire  side 
of  the  art  he  deals  with  is  for  him  an  un- 
explored country ;  the  side  of  practical, 
creative  design.  A  whole  array  of  con- 
siderations that  enter  into  the  production 
of  even  the  simplest  architectural  design, 
first  on  paper  and  then  in  the  material 
building,  can  be  fully  appreciated  only  by 
one  who  has  toiled  over  the  drawing- 
board,  dealt  with  questions  of  feet  and 
inches,  calculated  strains,  watched  the  ex- 
cavation, the  piling  of  the  masonry,  the 
details  of  the  finishing,  and  solved  the 
countless  minor  problems  that  arise  in  the 
working  out  and  execution  of  the  design. 
The  translation  of  an  abstract  architec- 
tural conception  into  the  concrete  form 
of  the  completed  building  is  a  part  of  the 
architect's  work  which  should  form  an 
important  factor  to  be  considered  in  judg- 
ing the  work.  No  layman  can  judge  a 
plan  with  the  appreciative  fairness  of  the 
man  who  has  created  many  plans,  and  to 
whom  a  plan  is  not  merely  a  diagram  of 
internal  arrangements,  but  a  key  to  and 
revelation  of  the  entire  structure.  The 
purely  theoretic  and  transcendental  criti- 
cism of  architecture  can  never  do  full  jus- 
tice, because  it  ignores  the  inner  proc- 
esses of  architectural  creation,  the  amount 


and  nature  and  importance  of  many  ele- 
ments and  forces  which  the  designer  of 
the  work  under  criticism  was  compelled 
to  consider  and  deal  with.  And  it  is  pre- 
cisely here  that  even  broadminded  and 
scholarly  literary  critics  often  fail. 

Nor  are  the  architects  themselves  quite 
blameless  in  their  critical  estimates. 
They  are  liable,  however,  to  err  in  a  dif- 
ferent direction.  Through  inadequacy 
of  historical  scholarship,  they  sometimes 
fail  to  take  broad  views,  they  become 
partisans  of  this  or  that  "style"  or  set  of 
forms,  and  intolerant  of  methods  of  de- 
sign different  from  their  own, — as  when 
one  of  them  recently  wrote  to  the  au- 
thor of  these  papers  that  there  were  but 
three  legitimate  styles  of  rural  house  de- 
sign proper  for  Americans  to  employ, 
the  Georgian  or  Colonial,  the  Swiss  and 
the  English!  Valid  architectural  criti- 
cism must  be  based  first  of  all  on  broad 
historical  scholarship ;  it  must  look 
through,  and  around,  behind  and  beneath 
all  the  styles  and  their  products,  to  dis- 
cover the  hidden  as  well  as  the  obvious 
factors  that  shaped  them,  the  point  of 
view  of  the  designers  and  their  method 
of  approach  to  the  problem.  It  must 
take  account  of  forms  and  details  as  re- 
sults, not  causes,  and  seek  for  the  reason 
of  their  adoption.  The  critic  must  con- 
sider alike  the  plan  and  the  construction, 
the  composition  and  the  decoration ;  note 
what  is  fundamental  and  what  is  super- 
ficial ;  what  is  essential  and  what  secon- 
dary. He  must  learn  to  distinguish  be- 
tween mere  personal  predilections  and 
sober  and  matured  judgments  based  on 
sound  reasoning  from  established  prem- 
ises. It  is  not  fair  or  valid  criticism  to 
judge  the  style  and  products  of  one  age, 
period  or  people  by  the  principles  and 
standards  of  another  age  or  period  or 
people.  It  is  of  course  fair,  and  indeed 
instructive,  to  compare  and  contrast  dif- 
ferent styles  and  periods,  but  in  the  crit- 
ical estimate  of  each,  the  critic  is  bound 
in  fairness  to  frame  his  judgment  in  the 
light  of  the  conditions,  the  circumstances, 
the  culture  and  the  needs  of  its  own  time 
and  environment.  The  capacity  for  sym- 
pathetic appreciation  of  widely  differing 
styles  is  rare,  but  it  is  essential  for  really 
valid  criticism.  For  the  critic  should  not 


t*  w  « 
0£<! 


428 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


FIG.  2.    STRUCTURAL  SYSTEM  OF  THE  COLOSSEUM  AT  ROME,  FROM  DRAWING  BY  THE 
LATE  PROF.  JULIEN  GUADET.  PARIS. 


be  like  a  special  paid  advocate  of  one  side 
against  another,  presenting  that  side  in 
the  most  favorable  light  and  disparaging 
to  the  utmost  the  other;  but  rather  like 
an  upright  judge  who,  with  full  knowl- 
edge of  the  law,  sums  up  in  perfect  fair- 
ness the  pros  and  cons  of  both  sides,  that 
the  jury — the  public — may  draw  its  own 
conclusions ;  himself  pronouncing  a  .final 


verdict  pro  or  con  only  when  the  evidence 
that  way  is  convincing  to  himself,  and 
such  as  should  carry  conviction  to  fair 
minds  generally. 

n. 

The  treatment  accorded  the  architec- 
ture of  imperial  Rome  by  the  majority 
of  modern  writers  in  English  is  an  inter- 
esting illustration  of  ready-made  tradi- 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


429 


tional  criticism.  Early  in  the  last  cen- 
tury interest  in  Greek  art  received  a  pro- 
digious impulse  from  the  explorations  in 
classic  lands  which  followed  the  publica- 
tion of  Stuart  and  Revett's  "Antiquities 
of  Athens,"  the  bringing  of  the  Elgin 
marbles  to  London  and  the  achievement 
of  independence  by  the  Greeks  in  1829. 
The  poetry  of  Byron  was  in  favor  in 
the  fashionable  world  and  the  ancient 
glories  of  Greece  were  a  prolific  theme 
of  conversation  and  literature.  The  per- 
fection of  Greek  architecture  and  sculp- 
ture was  universally  recognized,  and  to 
praise  Greek  art  was  accepted  as  an  evi- 
dence of  culture.  The  new  enthusiasm 
was  largely  literary  and  scholastic  in 
England  and  Germany,  where  it  chiefly 
prevailed,  and  later  in  America,  where 
every  English  movement  found  its  echo. 
Few  of  those  who  wrote  and  declaimed 
on  the  supremacy  of  Greek  art  had  any 
real  and  profound  knowledge  of  their 
subject,  at  least  any  first-hand  personal 
acquaintance  with  its  monuments.  But 
Greek  was  compared  with  Roman  art,  al- 
ways to  the  disparagement  of  the  latter, 
and  to  decry  Roman  architecture  as  in 
every  way  inferior  to  the  Greek  became 
an  accepted  mark  of  superior  taste  and 
artistic  discrimination.  Creative  power 
in  design  had  sunk  in  England  well  nigh 
to  its  lowest  depths,  and  the  revival  of 
architecture  was  sought  in  the  substitu- 
tion of  Greek  for  Roman  details.  So  far 
as  this  tended  towards  refinement  of  de- 
tail, the  result  was  beneficial,  but  Eng- 
lish architecture  gained  nothing  in  inven- 
tion ;  it  became  largely  an  art  of  facing 
indifferently  planned  buildings  with  im- 
posing Greek  colonnades.  At  the  same 
time,  another  school  of  reformers  was 
developing  the  Gothic  revival,  as  a  pro- 
test against  all  classic  "pagan"  forms,' 
and  its  apostles  were  declaiming  with 
equal  vehemence  against  Greek  temples, 
Roman  Pantheons  and  all  the  works  of 
the  irreligious  Renaissance.  At  the  hands 
of  these  various  reformers,  hardly  one  of 
whom  was  a  really  capable  architect,  if 
an  architect  at  all,  the  Romans  fared  very 
badly.  They  were  pagans — coarse,  vulgar 
conquerors,  destitute  of  taste,  mere  copy- 
ists and  imitators  of  the  Greeks,  and  bad 
ones  at  that ;  and  though  they  produced 


a  few  rather  fine  buildings  they  were  the 
first  corrupters  of  architecture  and  the 
prime  authors  of  all  the  falsehood,  sham, 
plagiarism,  confusion  and  bad  taste  that 
have  cursed  architecture  ever  since  the 
decline  of  Greece;  except  during  those 
blessed  middle  ages,  in  which  the  Gothic 
church-builders  for  a  few  centuries  re- 
vived and  maintained  a  true  art  on  sound 
principles. 

This  is  not  a  travesty  of  the  nineteenth 
century  attitude  towards  Roman  archi- 
tecture ;  it  is  based  on  the  actual  language 
of  reputable  writers,  from  Pugin  to  our 
own  time.  For  the  critical  verdicts  of 
the  Hellenic  and  Gothic  enthusiasts  of 
the  first  half  of  the  nineteenth  century 
have  been  almost  blindly  accepted  and  re- 
iterated by  so  many  of  the  writers  of  the 
last  fifty  years,  as  to  have  entered  into 
the  established  tradition  of  architectural 
criticism.  The  persistent  repetition  of 
disparaging  phrases  and  the  utterance  of 
sweeping  characterizations  in  strong  and 
picturesque  language,  are  much  easier 
than  patient,  impartial  investigation  lead- 
ing to  independent  judgments.  Those 
who  appreciate  the  noble  and  virile  qual- 
ities of  Roman  design  are  somewhat  to 
blame,  no  doubt,  for  this  prevalence  of 
hostile  and  condemnatory  criticism,  in 
that  they  have  never  seriously  under- 
taken to  reply  to  it.  I  am  not  familiar 
with  any  systematic  study  of  Roman  ar- 
chitecture that  has  taken  notice  of  this 
persistent  and  widespread  depreciatory 
criticism  and  attempted  to  meet  it. 
in. 

The  chief  counts  of  the  indictment 
drawn  up  by  the  hostile  critics  of  Roman 
architecture  may  be  summarized  some- 
what as  follows: 

1.  Roman  architecture  lacks  the  higher 
qualities    of    design — purity,    refinement 
and  good  taste,  and  substitutes  for  these 
a  pompous  grandeur  and  a  specious  mag- 
nificence.    It  is  coarse,  vulgar,  preten- 
tious. 

2.  The  Romans  were  plagiarists,  not 
originators;    they    appropriated,    copied, 
travestied  and  misapplied  the  forms  of 
Greek  architecture. 

3.  While  displaying  great  engineering 
skill  in  massive  constructions,  the  archi- 
tecture the  Romans  evolved  was  on  the 


«  w 

<55 

P  W 


o 

«  [n 

fe  O 


O  H 
55  55 
W  < 

a  3 

i 


432 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


plastic  side  illogical  and  inartistic  in  that 
it  converted  borrowed  structural  forms 
into  a  mere  decorative  apparel.  Particu- 
larly objectionable  was  the  Roman  com- 
bination of  the  arch  with  engaged  col- 
umns and  entablatures. 

4.  By  the  adoption  of  this  vesture  of 
sham  columnar  forms,  the  Romans  intro- 
duced into    architecture    an    element  of 
falsity  which  has  wrought  disastrous  con- 
sequences in  the  Renaissance  and  modern 
times. 

5.  By    nature    inartistic,    the    Romans 
substituted  repetitive  or  conventional  or- 
nament for  the  sculptural  decoration  of 
which  they  were  incapable  and  thus  de- 
graded the  art;  while  by   reducing  the 
Greek  orders  to  an  arbitrary  system  of 
mathematical  formulae,  they  put  a  me- 
chanical stamp  on  all  their  work  and  sac- 
rificed the  last  vestige  of  excuse  for  using 
the  Greek  orders.      In    consequence    of 
this,  Roman  architecture  is  everywhere 
monotonous  and  uninspired. 

This  is  a  pretty  severe  indictment !  The 
visitor  to  classic  lands  is  warned  against 
allowing  himself  to  be  betrayed  into  any- 
thing like  admiration  by  the  wanton  lure 
of  such  corrupt  and  pernicious  works  as 
the  Pantheon  or  the  Arch  of  Titus  at 
Rome,  the  House  of  the  Vettii  at  Pom- 
peii, or  the  Maison  Carree  at  Nimes.  He 
might  otherwise  allow  an  unguarded  ex- 
clamation of  delight  to  escape  him  on  see- 
ing a  restoration  of  the  order  of  the  Tem- 
ple of  Castor  and  Pollux  or  of  Faustina. 
He  might  discover  exquisite  delicacy  in 
the  stucco  reliefs  of  the  Baths,  of  the 
Forum  of  Pompeii,  of  certain  tombs  on 
the  Via  Latina,  or  fragments  in  the  Mu- 
seo  delle  Terme  at  Rome.  As  an  Archi- 
tect he  might  in  a  forgetful  moment  de- 
clare that  the  planning  of  the  great  Ro- 
man Thermae,  or  of  the  Forum  of  Trajan, 
or  of  the  Basilica  of  Constantine,  seemed 
to  him  superb  in  its  originality,  ingenuity, 
artistic  effectiveness  and  grasp  of  the 
.problem.  He  might  even — horrible 
thought! — express  delight  and  admira- 
tion in  the  contemplation  of  the  Colos- 
seum, or  even  of  the  Hexagonal  Court  at 
Baalbec.  Having  been,  however,  prop- 
erly instructed  by  the  critics,  he  would 
repress  his  uncultured  enthusiasm,  and 
shaking  his  head  at  the  aesthetic  deprav- 


ity of  the  Romans,  restrain  his  emotions 
until  he  could  let  them  loose  before  the 
ruins  of  the  Parthenon  or  of  Melrose  Ab- 
bey. 

IV. 

Let  us  rehearse  briefly  the  charges  of 
the  critics  under  the  first  count — lack  of 
taste  and  refinement,  coarseness,  vulgar- 
ity, pretentious  magnificence  in  place  of 
fine  and  pure  design. 

Fergusson,  in  his  "History  of  Archi- 
tecture" (I,  294),  says  of  the  Roman 
buildings  "in  every  city  from  the  Eu- 
phrates to  the  Tagus" :  "In  all  cases  they 
display  far  more  evidence  of  wealth  and 
power  than  of  taste  and  refinement. 
Whenever  ornament  is  attempted  their 
bad  taste  comes  out"  (p.  324).  The 
Colosseum  "does  not  possess  one  detail 
which  is  not  open  to  criticism  and  indeed 
to  positive  blame"  (p.  326).  "The  taste 
displayed  in  them"  (triumphal  arches) 
"is  more  than  questionable"  (p.  340). 

Burn,  in  his  "Rome  and  the  Cam- 
pagna,"  remarks  that  "in  all  attempts  to 
create  ornamental  structures  they"  (the 
Romans)  "failed  to  produce  anything 
more  than  gigantic  and  grotesque  imita- 
tions of  Greek  art. ( !)  From  an  artistic 
point  of  view,  therefore,  the  study  of 
their  buildings  is  barren."  Here  we  have 
the  verdict  of  a  blind  and  unreasoning 
Hellenist,  to  whom  even  the  Pantheon 
and  the  Colosseum  are  "imitations  of 
Greek  art!" 

Ruskin  considers  that  the  Greek  Doric 
capital  was  spoiled  "by  the  Romans  in 
endeavors  to  mend  it,"  and  that  the  Ro- 
man modillion  (cornice-bracket)  was 
"barbarous  and  effeminate."  In  a  recent 
and  generally  excellent  one-volume  "His- 
tory of  Architecture,"  Mr.  H.  H.  Stat- 
ham  pronounces  the  Ionic  cap  of  the 
Temple  of  Fortuna  Virilis  "with  its  small 
feeble  volutes  a  poor  cast-iron  looking 
affair."  Reber  condemns  the  Roman 
four-sided  Ionic  capital  (the  "Scamozzi 
Ionic"  type)  as  an  inartistic  invention 
which  destroyed  the  character  of  the  cap- 
ital. But  it  is  A.  K.  Porter,  who,  in  the 
first  volume  of  his  "Mediaeval  Architec- 
ture," deals  the  most  stalwart  blows 
against  the  artistic  claims  of  Roman 
architecture.  "Under  Rome,"  he  says, 
"magnificence  was  substituted  for  refine- 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


433 


merit" ;  "for  refinement  and  delicacy  was 
(sic)  substituted  coarseness  and  display." 
It  is  the  "depraved  taste"  of  modern 
times  which  has  perpetuated  the  Roman 
combination  of  arch  and  order.  The 
Corinthian  order  is  said  to  have  "crowd- 
ed out  the  less  blatant*  orders."  "Capi- 
tals and  mouldings  seems  to  be  machine 
made."  "The  effect  of  the  whole,  for  all 
its  blatancy,  is  inexpressibly  dreary  and 
monotonous."  And  again :  "When  our 
eyes  have  been  refreshed  by  the  study  of 
the  purer  forms  of  Greek  or  mediaeval 
architecture,  the  Roman  designs  at  once 
appear  in  their  true  vulgarity."  (Chap- 
ter I,  passim.) 

These  quotations  by  no  means  exhaust 
the  allegations  of  the  critics  as  to  the. 
tastelessness  and  inherent  artistic  poverty 
of  the  defendant,  but  they  suffice  to  show 
their  general  attitude.  Regarding  the  sec- 
ond count — that  of  plagiarism  and  mis- 
use of  the  Greek  forms — the  critics  are 
quite  as  severe.  "This  Greek  architec- 
ture," says  Ruskin,  "was  clumsily  copied 
and  varied  by  the  Romans,  with  no  par- 
ticular result  .  .  .  except  only  that  the 
Doric  capital  was  spoiled,"  etc.  To  Rus- 
kin, indeed,  all  classic  "orders"  are  con- 
temptible. In  the  "Stones  of  Venice"  he 
expresses  his  belief  that  "a  single  invent- 
ive soul  could  create  a  thousand  orders 
in  an  hour" — probably  the  greatest  com- 
pliment ever  paid  by  a  transcendental 
critic  to  the  creative  powers  of  the  soul ! 
With  modern  mechanical  ingenuity  and 
the  rules  of  Vitruvius,  Ruskin  was  quite 
confident  that  a  machine  could  be  made 
"to  furnish  pillars  and  friezes  to  the  size 
ordered,  of  any  of  the  five  orders,  on  the 
most  perfect  Greek  models  in  any  quan- 
tity," which  any  bricklayer  could  set  up 
at  their  proper  distances,  "so  that  we  may 
dispense  with  our  architects  altogether." 
(Vol.  3,  ii,  XC.)  The  Ionic  he  calls  a 
"ram's  order,"  which  could  easily  be 
made  an  "ibex  order"  or  an  "ass's  or- 
der." The  Roman  Tuscan  and  Doric 
orders  are  "among  the  most  stupid  vari- 
ations ever  invented  upon  forms  already 
known"  (ibid,  i,  App.  7).  Mr.  Porter, 
in  the  chapter  already  quoted  from,  de- 
clares that  "Roman  art  lacks  originality, 
and  is  in  fact,  little  more  than  an  adapta- 

*The  italics  are  ours. 


tion  of  Greek  models  to  suit  the  pompos- 
ity and  vulgarity  of  Roman  taste."  And 
Mr.  Sturgis,  commenting  on  the  great 
Temple  of  Venus  and  Rome,  considers 
that  "the  Romans  have  little  claim  to 
originality  as  builders  or  as  makers  of 
plans ;  what  they  knew  best  was  how  to 
appropriate  the  ideas,  as  they  appropri- 
ated the  wealth,  of  the  Mediterranean 
world."  "The  pure  ornament  of  the 
Romans  was  as  nearly  a  reproduction  of 
the  Greek  as  they  could  make  it,"  says 
Porter.  And,  lest  one  should  unduly 
magnify  the  importance  and  originality 
of  the  Roman  invention  of  the  modillion- 
cornice,  he  explains  it  by  the  airy  re- 
mark that  "it  occurred  to  some  genius  to 
clap  both  dentils  and  modillions  upon  the 
same  entablature."  "The  forms  of  de- 
based late  Greek  art  the  Romans  fixed 
into  a  cut-and-dried  canon  from  which 
minor  variations  were  possible,  but  no 
real  progress" :  this  is  Mr.  Porter's  final 
verdict  on  Roman  originality. 

The  third  and  fourth  counts  are  sup- 
ported in  part  by  the  passages  quoted 
above,  and  by  many  others.  They  al- 
lege, in  brief,  the  illogical  application  to 
Roman  arcaded  and  vaulted  construction 
in  brick  and  concrete,  of  the  forms  filched 
from  Greek  architecture  and  converted 
or  diverted  from  their  original  structural 
function  to  that  of  mere  decoration — a 
false  and  pretentious  veneer  of  misused 
detail.  Particularly  to  be  condemned  is 
the  marriage  of  the  arch  with  the  col- 
umnar system.  This  detestable  alliance, 
parent  of  specious  villainies  through  the 
last  five  centuries,  thanks  to  the  "de- 
praved modern  taste,"  receives  the  special 
castigation  of  the  critics.  Of  these,  Fer- 
gusson  is  by  far  the  most  moderate,  find- 
ing that  the  two  systems,  the  columnar 
.  and  the  arcuated,  "although  not  without 
a  certain  richness  of  effect"  are  "too  dis- 
tinctly dissimilar  to  be  pleasing."  Mr. 
Sturgis  characterizes  the  columnar  ap- 
parel of  the  Colosseum  and  like  struc- 
tures as  "this  outer  decoration,  the  sham 
columns,  the  make-believe  entablatures, 
the  whole  imitative  structure  built  up 
with  the  real  mass  behind"  (Hist,  of 
Arch.,  i,  304).  In  his  earlier  work 
"European  Architecture,"  he  calls  it 
"this  decoration  by  means  of  real  arches 


THEATKE   DE  MAKCELLVS 

ELEVATION  •  PROFILS -GENERAVX- ET-PLAN -AV-  XL 


SECTION 


SVR  L'AXE  D'VNE  ARCADE 


SECTION 

SVR  LAXE  DVNE  COLONNE 


FIG.  5.  ARCADED  ORDERS  OF  THE 
THEATRE  OF  MARCELLUS,  ROME.  FROM 
A  FRENCH  DRAWING  (GUILLAUME). 


•I 


FIG.   6.    ARCH    OF   TITUS,    ROME. 


436 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


and  imposts  flanked  and  framed  by  a 
make-believe  post-and-lintel  architec- 
ture." He  admits  its  popularity  and  even 
ascribes  to  it  elements  of  beauty,  seren- 
ity and  stateliness,  but  thinks  it  appeals 
most  to  people  "not  very  sensitive  to  the 
delicacies  of  fine  art"  (pp.  95,  96).  Of 
the  arches  of  triumph,  Reber  says  that 
in  them  we  have  "a  mass  of  masonry  en- 
closed in  columns  and  entablatures  which 
were  merely  ornamental  features  with- 
out structural  significance."  Mr.  Stat- 
ham  describes  the  Roman  design  of 
arch  and  order  as  a  "planting"  of  half- 
columns  "all  around  the  exterior,  appear- 
ing to  carry  entablatures  which  were 
really  carried  by  the  arches  between  the 
order"  (sic)  ;  and  calls  these  orders 
"only  a  kind  of  scenery  planted  onto  a 
building  with  which  they  had  no  real 
structural  relation"  (History  of  Archi- 
tecture, pp.  144,  145).  Further  on  he 
says  that  this  mistake  "has  left  a  long 
legacy  of  falsehood  to  architecture:  a 
falsehood  revived  at  the  Renaissance  and 
still  frequently  perpetrated  in  obedience 
to  the  tyranny  of  custom."  Mr.  Porter 
is,  of  course,  very  severe  in  his  animad- 
versions on  the  Roman  orders  in  general. 
Reproducing  a  beautiful  drawing  of  the 
Doric  order  of  the  Basilica  Julia,  he 
considers  it  a  "sufficient  commentary  on 
the  decline  of  Roman  art."  The  use  of 
the  pedestal  in  Roman  architecture  he 
calls  "a  gratuitous  addition,"  which  the 
tone  of  the  context  indicates  is  intended 
as  a  condemnation.  While  the  Greek 
columns  consistently  combined  ornamen- 
tal and  constructive  functions,  "the  Ro- 
mans made  them  almost  wholly  decora- 
tive." After  their  buildings  were  built, 
he  declares,  "the  Romans  applied  the  col- 
umns as  a  surface  decoration,  either  in 
the  form  of  freestanding  porticoes  or 
peristyles,  or  more  frequently  as  an  en- 
gaged order  built  into  the  wall."  This 
was  certainly  a  singular  method  of  pro- 
cedure, of  which  the  authorities  have 
hitherto  been  strangely  ignorant ! 

The  fifth  count  deals  with  the  charge 
of  stereotyped  rules  of  design.  Many 
of  the  quotations  already  made  bear 
upon  this  point.  Mr.  Statham  thinks 
that  the  Romans  looked  upon  the  em- 
ployment of  the  orders  as  constituting 


in  itself  the  art  of  architecture,  so  that 
the  latter  became  little  more  than  the 
planting  of  the  orders  on  all  sorts  of 
buildings.  This  is  a  surprising  judg- 
ment to  be  uttered  by  an  architect  so 
well-informed  in  general  as  Mr.  Stat- 
ham. Mr.  Porter  pronounces  Roman 
capitals  and  mouldings  to  be  "machine- 
made,"  and  declares  that  "the  effect  of 
the  whole,  for  all  its  blatancy,  is  inex- 
pressibly dreary  and  monotonous." 
"From  the  Persian  Gulf  to  the  Firth  of 
Forth,  from  the  Baths  of  Caracalla  to 
Constantine,  Roman  art  shows  a  lack  of 
variation  absolutely  without  a  parallel  in 
history"  (Med.  Arch.,  i,  32).  Mr.  Stur- 
gis,  in  the  comments  on  the  Temple  of 
Venus  and  Rome  already  referred  to 
(ante,  p.  433),  says  that  "all  this,  except 
the  building  in  mortar-masonry  and  the 
idea  of  a  vault,  might  ha^'e  occurred  to  a 
Creek"  (the  italics  are  ours),  and  that 
"the  Romans  have  little  claim  to  origin- 
ality" even  "as  builders  and  makers  of 
plans."  Reber,  more  generous,  notes  that 
their  borrowings  of  foreign  features  were 
confined  to  the  external  apparel,  while  he 
credits  the  Romans  with  supplying  the 
general  disposition  and  constructive 
forms  of  their  buildings. 

This  mass  of  hostile  criticism  has  been 
culled  from  a  few  books  only,  but  they 
are  all  books  which  have  been  put  forth 
with  certain  claims  to  authoritative  teach- 
ing, and  their  judgments  are  typical  of  a 
much  larger  mass  of  similar  verdicts  to 
be  found  in  textbooks  on  architecture, 
books  of  travel  and  magazine  articles  by 
English  and  American  writers.  The  vol- 
ume of  this  testimony  and  the  unity  of 
spirit  that  pervades  it  are  impressive, 
and  either  convincing  or  suspicious  ac- 
cording to  the  way  we  seek  to  account  for 
them.  The  testimony  certainly  seems 
convincing  to  the  average  reader  who  has 
no  means  of  testing  its  validity.  It  puts 
Roman  architecture  on  the  defensive ; 
and  those  who,  in  the  face  of  this  indict- 
ment are  brave  enough  to  admire  the 
defendant,  must  stand  up  and  show  cause 
why  the  verdict  of  condemnation  should 
not  be  pronounced  on  all  the  counts.  The 
case  for  the  prosecution  is  apt  to  look 
very  serious  until  the  testimony  and  ar- 
guments for  the  defense  are  presented. 


COLOR,  IN  ARCHITECTURE 
AT  THE  PANAMA^PACIFIC 
EXPOSITION 

BY     W2.  L.WOOLLETT 


EXPOSITION  architecture  would 
not  ordinarily  be  considered,  on 
account  of  its  evanescent  charac- 
ter, a  proper  subject  or  example  for  elu- 
cidating principles  of  architecture.  Ex- 
position architecture,  as  we  commonly 
know  it,  in  the  ultimate,  must  appear  to 
be  unreal.  It  is  palpably  a  colossal 
Dream  City,  and  must  be  appraised  in 
terms  peculiar  to  itself.  And  yef  in  the 
realization  of  such  a  "dream"  the  aesthetic 
point  of  view  should  be  somewhat  simi- 
lar to  that  obtaining  in  architecture  under 
normal  conditions.  The  architectural 
scheme,  even  of  an  exposition,  requires 
conformity  to  recognized  standards  with- 
in certain  limits ;  i.e.,  the  peg  of  reason  on 
which  we  hang  the  emotional  appeal,  the 
form  and  structure  or  implied  structure 
of  an  exposition  building,  bears  a  similar 
relation  to  the  color  scheme  as  in  ordi- 
nary conditions.  In  the  instance  of  the 
Panama-Pacific  International  Exposition, 
at  San  Francisco,  the  element  of  color 
is  so  pronounced  a  feature,  and  the 
use  of  color  has  been  hailed  with  so 
much  of  popular  acclaim,  that  there  ap- 
pears to  be  here  a  special  opportunity 
to  learn  something  of  the  meaning  of 
"Color  in  Architecture." 

In  the  panorama  of  this  exposition  we 
may  in  our  imagination  see  in  sumptuous 
array  of  color,  vast  bundles  of  oriental 
stuffs,  vistas  of  palaces  and  temples  and 
arcaded  halls,  and  the  gardens  of  Baby- 
lon and  visions  of  Atalanta  come  true 
near  the  cobalt  waters  of  the  Pacific.  We 
Tiay  sprinkle  this  oriental  melee  of  color 
with  the  gems  of  the  Indus,  whilst  the 
galleys  of  victorious  fleets  laden  with 
captured  splendors  vie  with  each  other 
for  landing  space  at  the  steps  of  the 
Great  Water  Gate.  Or  we  may  in  cold 
analysis  ask  of  our  reason,  why  this?  or 
why  that  ?  and  in  the  process  lose  perhaps 
some  of  the  wild  joy  of  abandonment. 


Viewed  as  a  serious  attempt  to  do 
something  beautiful,  this  work,  in  order 
to  lay  claim  to  excellence,  must  qualify 
not  only  in  its  color  appeal  but  in  form 
and  abstract  values  as  well. 

The  essence  of  a  work  of  art,  accord- 
ing to  common  consent,  resides  in  an  ex- 
pression of  personality.  Without  the  in- 
dividual spark  there  is  no  such  thing  as 
art.  Two  men  cannot  paint  a  portrait, 
write  a  poem  or  a  symphony,  or  produce 
a  piece  of  architecture.  Accordingly 
Jules  Guerin,  greatest  of  our  architect- 
ural colorists,  was  intrusted  with  the 
commission  of  advising  the  Board  of 
Architects  of  the  Panama-Pacific  Inter- 
national Exposition,  in  order  that  the 
whole  scheme  might  be  the  harmonious 
expression  of  one  personality  in  color. 

In  a  critical  view  of  a  work  of  this 
sort  it  is  desirable  to  bear  in  mind  that 
it  is  easier  to  criticise  than  to  create — 
and  easier  to  improve  than  to  improvise. 
However,  the  work  of  these  builders  of 
the  exposition,  who  have  been  pioneers 
in  many  respects,  seems  to  emphasize 
that  such  a  work  is  more  easily  created 
in  parts  by  a  group  of  artists  than  it  can 
be  satisfactorily  made  as  a  whole  to  a 
single  critic.  And  it  remains  to  be  proven 
that  this  assemblage  of  beautiful  bits  of 
architecture,  bound  together  in  a  har- 
mony of  color,  is  necessarily  a  work  of 
art. 

The  general  color  of  the  exposition  is 
exotic,  Eastern.  A  great  emotional  poem 
in  color  reverberates  and  pulses  for  our 
delectation  under  the  lazy  blue  of  the 
sky  and  beside  the  rippling  blue  of  the 
waters.  From  masses  of  warm  walls  of 
Travertine  and  the  warmer  tones  in  the 
roof  areas,  opalescent,  greenish  domes  lift 
their  curves  of  scintillant  light  into  the 
heaven  of  California  days.  Jeweled  tow- 
ers vie  with  the  stars  and  the  sheen  of 
the  ocean,  and  at  the  first  sight  of  the 


438 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


spectacle  the  heart  and  mind  are  tingled 
into  expectancy.  Clothed  in  a  vast  man- 
tel of  soft  grey  colors,  refulgent  with 
unseen  lights,  blooms  a  vista  of  color 
gardens.  Like  a  spirited  horse  tethered, 
the  mind  strains  to  be  off  on  the  wings 
of  exploration  of  this  panoply  of  light. 
Here  the  radiance  of  a  cashmere  shawl 
greets  the  eye,  there  th£  soft  tone  of 
the  Ottoman's  saddle  bag,  then  the  domi- 
nant note  of  some  old  Sienna  rug,  or  the 
gleam  of  a  Saracen  blade.  A  thousand 
minor  notes  of  the  dominant  color 
scores  greet  the  eye.  A  vast  puls- 
ing mosaic  of  color,  a  palette  of  unrivaled 
beauty,  stirs  and  for  a  moment  enslaves 
the  imagination.  And  then,  after  the 
first  flush  of  expectancy,  of  exultant  emo- 
tion tricked  into  an  overwhelming  im- 
pulse through  {he  magic  of  color,  comes 
analysis. 

To  the  searcher  for  abstract  beauty, 
to  him  who  comes  with  the  mind  of  the 
Occident  as  well  as  with  the  soul  of  the 
Orient,  the  Exposition  City  has  told  its 
best  in  the  first  "mad  moment"  of  beauty. 
Here  the  story  ends.  A  tragedy  appar- 
ently ;  but  no,  I  say  "ends"  with  a  pur- 
pose, for  in  thus  speaking  broadly  we 
free  ourselves  to  pass  to  detailed  analysis 
of  a  very  interesting  architectural  situa- 
tion, having  in  unqualified  terms  given 
honor  where  honor  is  unquestionably 
due. 

In  a  work  of  this  magnitude  there  are, 
of  course,  two  points  of  view :  One,  the 
consideration  of  ensemble,  of  mass,  and 
the  like,  and  the  other,  consideration  of 
details. 

In  matters  of  detail  the  use  of  colored 
pigments  is  probably  the  most  noteworthy 
phase  of  the  architectural  scheme.  Every- 
thing which  the  eye  rests  upon,  whether 
of  wood,  iron  or  plaster,  has  been  paint- 
ed. The  dominant  note  is  the  walls  of 
imitation  Travertine  stone,  which  is  in 
reality  colored  plaster  with  a  special  tex- 
ture. 

In  the  handling  of  architectural  detail, 
in  the  doorways,  sculptured  groups,  and 
other  details  which  are  best  examined 
near  at  hand,  there  are  gems  of  archi- 
tectural beauty  and  harmonious  color. 
The  portals  of  Faville,  for  instance, 
foiled  by  the  studied  calm  of  cliff-like 


walls,  are  rich  beyond  comparison,  mel- 
low to  the  point  of  antique  delight  and 
juicy  with  time-worn  color,  a  dream  for 
the  artist's  fancy.  However,  taken  in  con- 
junction with  the  masses  of  the  buildings 
of  which  they  form  a  part,  and  viewed 
from  a  point  where  the  ensemble  is  pos- 
sible, these  spots  of  transcendent  interest 
are  reduced  to  smudges  of  color.  Be- 
cause the  architecture  was  composed 
aside  from  the  colorist's  conception,  these 
gems  of  ornament  have  lost,  to  a  degree 
at  least,  their  capacity  to  convey  the  true 
subtlety  of  the  artist's  thought.  The  ap- 
plication of  pigment  has  softened  and  de- 
tracted from  the  values.  Frequently 
there  remains  little  of  thought  directing 
quality.  However,  there  is  as  a  residue 
a  delightful  texture,  a  rug  like  quality,  if 
you  please,  due  to  the  juxtaposition  of  a 
variety  of  nicely  balanced  color  values. 
But  the  structure,  the  static  quality,  the 
thought  directing  element,  all  these  have 
been  depleted  or  have  disappeared  in  a 
subdued  pastel  sketch  effect.  Viewed  as 
specimens  of  detailed  decoration  near  at 
hand  they  are  poems  of  ornament. 

A  consequence  of  this  loss  of  thought- 
directing  detail  is  an  absence  of  scale. 
You  feel  that  you  are  looking  at  one  of 
Jules  Guerin's  prints ;  whether  a  real  live 
water  color  drawing  or  a  reprint — one 
ponders. 

The  Tower  of  Jewels  is  a  most  in- 
teresting example  of  this  submerging  of 
the  architectural  interest  in  color  domi- 
nance. Here  a  superb  pile  of  richly 
formed,  elegantly  proportioned  masses 
has  been  denuded  of  its  original  vitality. 
The  various  and  strongly  colored  parts 
have  become  detached,  the  sense  of  unity 
is  gone,  and  as  a  result  the  composition 
is  without  appeal  as  to  its  colossal  size. 
In  the  Tower  of  Jewels  the  details,  such 
as  the  eagles,  equestrian  statues,  etc., 
have  been  reduced  by  an  all-over  coat  of 
color  to  mere  lumps  whose  form  and 
character  lines  are  so  unannounced  that 
there  is  nothing  by  which  the  mind  can 
gauge  the  quality  or  estimate  the  rela- 
tion to  the  whole.  One  intuitively  feels 
that  the  designer  had  his  matter  well 
in  hand,  that  he  knew  where  his  chief 
darks  should  come.  There  is  an  in- 
trinsic fine  balance  and  lilt  and  lift 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


439 


to  the  composition  as  a  whole,  due  to 
the  nice  distribution  of  values.  The  ap- 
plied pigment  has  readjusted  and  mis- 
placed the  original  color  values  so  that 
the  real  "kick,"  as  determined  in  the  de- 
signing architect's  mind,  is  gone.  The 
color  "kick"  has  resulted  in  making  this 
feature  heavy  as  a  mass,  whereas  its 
place  in  the  composition  demanded 
lightness,  effervescence,  billowing,  fluffy, 
cloudlike,  puffy  exuberance,  a  gathering 
together  into  one  giant  "parfait"  of  all 
the  lightness  and  daintiness  of  the  Mc- 
Kim  court.  In  the  soffit  of  the  big:  cof- 
fered arch  the  coloring  of  the  panels  has 
flattened  the  effect  and  turned  the  mag- 
nificent Travertine  stone  into  paper.  The 
red-colored  coffered  ceiling:  gives  a  chalk- 
like  effect  to  the  stunning  murals  which 
flame  with  wonderful  color  when  seen 
without  the  accompaniment  of  "archi- 
tectural" paint.  •  The  sense  of  reality,  of 
permanence  and  stability,  is  preserved  in 
the  lower  part  of  the  tower.  The  treat- 
ment of  the  main  cornice  of  this  portion 
is  a  dream  of  color  and  in  no  way  de- 
tracts from  the  stone  effect  evidently 
desired. 

The  Court  of  the  Sun,  Moon  and 
Stars,  by  McKim,  Mead  and  White,  a 
composition  of  which  the  Tower  of  Jew- 
els forms  the  crowning  member,  is  the 
architectural  piece  de  resistance  of  the 
exposition.  This  magnificent  architect- 
ural spectacle,  composed  with  delicate 
•fancy  and  rich  accompaniment  of  con- 
ventional ornament  and  bas  relief,  has 
been  but  slightly  jarred  from  its  original 
supine  calm.  The  deterrent  color  notes 
and  groups  of  too  assertive  statuary  can 
hardly  be  said  to  mar  the  effect  as  a 
whole.  The  stirring  groups  of  statuary 
which  surmount  the  main  architectural 
features,  and  which  are  supposed  to  an- 
nounce themselves  as  the  concentrated 
essence  of  the  thought  as  proclaimed  in 
the  court  as  a  whole,  have  been  colored 
a  light  brown.  This  simply  has  the  ef- 
fect of  relieving  the  pedestal  of  their 
weight.  One  wonders,  how  far  back? 
It  is  quite  theatrical,  this  shifting  of 
"scenes,"  of  planes. 

The  floor  of  the  court  is  "furnished" 
with  statues  and  fountains,  whose  bulb- 
ous forms  by  their  proboscis-like  effront- 


ery push  to  insignificance  the  gentle  grace 
of  the  inclosing  colonnades.  These  sweep- 
ing colonnades,  like  a  picket  fence,  inclose 
great  colossal,  recumbent  figures  which 
oppose  their  giant  limbs  athwart  each 
vista  of  the  eye,  and  shrivel  to  an  inglori- 
ous dissonance  that  which  would  other- 
wise be  an  architectural  symphony.  The 
interest  originally  attaching  to  the  ele- 
gantly modeled  frieze  has,  through  the 
use  of  a  delightful  color  magic,  shifted  to 
the  cornices  and  openings.  The  color  de- 
tail one  must  pronounce  as  being  at  once 
elegant,  naive,  and  satisfying.  The  pris- 
tine glories  of  classic  lines  and  classic  fig- 
ures which,  in  fine  repose,  are  set  to  en- 
rich and  enliven  the  friezes,  are  dulled 
by  comparison  with  the  yellow  statues, 
nearby,  which,  like  giant  incrustations, 
flatten  themselves  against  the  walls. 
Painted  pilasters  skip  up  and  down  the 
dignity  of  Travertine  stone  piers. 

The  glorious  sculptured  group  by  Isi- 
dore Konti  about  the  pedestal  of  the  great 
column  on  the  axis  of  the  court  is  stolen 
from  the  view  by  a  "smashing"  bit  of 
colored  kiosk-like  band  stand,  which, 
like  an  apple  woman  in  Broadway,  un- 
profitably  obstructs  the  traffic  of  the  eye. 

No  greater  Roman  holiday  was  ever 
made  than  this.  Shades  of  Stanford 
White  stalk  nightly  in  this  wonder  place, 
where  the  gemmed  star  maidens  look 
down  on  dusky  sisters  clothed  in  Ori- 
ental sepia.  The  dead  spleen  of  Vitru- 
vius  should  gather  grit  to  see  so  lordly 
a  scheme  go  through  the  color  pots. 
Yellow  domes  atop  these  classic  piles 
proclaim  against  the  cerulean  blue  in  un- 
mistakable paean,  "Who  did  this  thing?" 
Undoubtedly  a  paint  pot  flew  into  the 
sky. 

And  yet  the  color  glories  of  the  whole 
proclaim  a  pace  so  spent  for  beaut  \  that 
one  halts  to  ponder.  "If  this  could  have 
been  done  at  its  best,  it  would  have  out- 
done itself  and  placed  a  b?. u  on  future 
accomplishment." 

In  pleasing  contrast  tp  the  evident  loss 
of  scale  and  force  in  the  supposedly 
crowning  feature  of  the  architectural 
composition  is  Mullgardt's  superb  court 
— the  Court  of  Creation.  This  work  was 
originally  intended  for  a  riot  of  color. 
The  application  of  pigment  has  been 


440 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


eliminated.  The  result  is  that  the  work  of 
the  artist  is  left  in  its  unrivaled  beauty. 
This  court  is  a  true  dream  in  exposition 
architecture.  The  detail  counts  for  all 
that  it  may;  the  architect's  thoughts  as 
expressed  in  mass,  line,  detail,  announce 
themselves  in  unmistakable  terms,  un- 
foiled  by  deterrent  color. 

In  any  architectural  composition  there 
must  be  some  reposeful  element,  some 
undetermined  zone  of  emotion  from 
which  the  thought-directing  element  must 
spring  or  be  evolved.  The  unbroken 
wall  surfaces,  whose  texture  and  sub- 
stance are  left  to  the  imagination,  carry 
in  forceful,  purposeful  manner  their  just 
weight  in  the  composition. 

In  the  court  of  Mullgardt  the  pure 
undivided  over-grey  of  walls  and  orna- 
ment alike  holds  in  solution  the  domi- 
nant thought.  A  delicate  tracery  of  de- 
tail, which  by  its  disposition  and  its 
charm  of  form  leads  the  imagination 
on,  is  pregnant  with  the  abstract  thought 
in  the  artist's  mind.  This  court,  of 
all  the  work  in  the  exposition,  ex- 
presses most  definitely  perhaps  the  un- 
trammcled  vital  spark  of  originality.  In 
the  modeling  of  the  architectural  orna- 
ment one  intuitively  feels  the  influence 
of  the  architect's  master  hand.  The 
sculpture,  however,  particularly  the  main 
tower  groups,  lacks  contact  with  the 
architecture.  This  sculpture  is  less  col- 
orful, less  dynamic  than  the  adjacent 
architectural  ornament.  It  also  lacks 
subtlety,  fineness  and  refinement,  and 
fails  decidedly  to  express  the  same  sup- 
pressed electric  grotesque  quality  which 
is  announced  with  such  good  effect  in 
some  of  the  less  important  groups.  The 
sculpture,  though  plainly  less  vocal  than 
the  architecture,  is  decidedly  interesting, 
well  composed  and  powerful.  It  might 
well  be  deemed  a  crime  to  mention  this 
lack  of  correspondence,  for  there  is  evi- 
dent sincerity  of  effort  and  a  much  great- 
er correspondence  than  we  find  in  many 
works  of  greater  prominence.  The  lack 
of  a  certain  kindred  spirit,  which  only  a 
Mullgardt  sculptor  could  evolve,  is  hard- 
ly a  reasonable  lament. 

The  central  fountain  by  Aiken  in  this 
court  is  well  worth  while,  considered  by 
itself,  being  rich  in  imagery  and  beauti- 


fully composed,  but  too  large  in  scale  and 
in  mass  for  its  place  in  the  composition. 
Its  effect  is  to  dw^arf  the  court  as  a 
whole.  Only  when  this  note  is  out  of  the 
line  of  vision  does  the  full  beauty  of  the 
place  appear. 

The  wall  decorations  by  Brangwyn  at 
the  ends  of  the  corridors  are  masterpieces 
of  wall  decoration,  fit  counterpart  of  this 
gloriously  vivid  individual  work.  The 
color  of  these  glows  like  burning  coals. 
They  serve  to  vivify  the  idea  that  from 
subterranean  fires  where  colors  leap  and 
play ;  from  the  earth  and  air  and  sky  and 
sea  where  eternal  forces  are  locked  in 
titanic  struggle  to  be  free,  the  Court  of 
the  Universe  comes  forth  to  greet  the  eye 
in  a  festoon  of  tempered,  controlled, 
vitriolic  lava,  formed  and  fashioned  into 
a  bit  of  architecture  lurid  with  a  soul's 
delight  in  creation. 

The  superb  handling  of  the  murals  in 
Mullgardt's  court  suggests  a  word  in 
general  as  to  the  relation  of  murals  to 
this  matter  of  "Color  in  Architecture." 
A  mural  painting  should  be  what  the  term 
implies — "on  the  wall."  As  in  the  work 
of  Puvis  de  Chavannes,  one  should 
feel  more  of  wall  than  of  color,  more  of 
structure  behind  than  of  forms  repre- 
sented. In  the  color  scheme  of  the  whole 
a  mural  may  or  may  not  count  as  a  domi- 
nant note,  but  at  all  times  should  be  sub- 
servient to  the  wall  feeling  and  in  har- 
mony with  the  general  color  scheme. 
In  Brangwyn's  painting  one  could  con- 
sciously feel  a  desire  to  know  the  jointing 
of  the  stone  work  in  the  wall,  in  spite  of 
the  rich  tonal  effects,  so  flat,  so  second- 
ary is  the  plane  or  perspective  element. 

The  mural  decorations  of  the  exposi- 
tion are  in  the  main  alive  and  graceful, 
teeming  with  rich  imagery  and  full  of 
clear  color.  But  in  the  color  scheme 
they  count  merely  as  jewels,  resplendent 
with  color,  like  ripening  fruit ;  they  are 
not  (with  exceptions  of  course)  murals, 
on  walls ;  they  are  merely  bits  of  bright 
color,  little  eLfinlike  butterfly  bits  of  color 
in  a  pageantry  of  blatant  color  which  as- 
serts itself  in  blobs  and  chunks.  For  in 
this  color  composition  huge  areas,  heavy 
with  color  and  in  values  which  dominate, 
stride  like  giants  beside  the  sea  and  throw 
themselves  into  the  air.  Dank  with  the 


Copyrighted,  Panama- Pacific  International  Exposition  Co. 

THE    TOWER   OF   JEWELS,    PANAMA- PACIFIC    EXPOSITION,   SAN    FRANCISCO. 


"DANCING   THE   GRAPES"— PANEL    BY    FRANK    BRANGWYN, 
PANAMA- PACIFIC   EXPOSITION. 


"THE    FRUIT   PICKERS"— PANEL   BY    FRANK    BRANGWYN, 
PANAMA- PACIFIC    EXPOSITION. 


THE    PALACE   OF    HORTICULTURE,    PAN  AM  A- PACIFIC    EXPOSITION,   SAN    FRANCISCO. 


NICHE  IN  COURT  OF  FOUR  SEASONS,  PANAMA -PACIFIC  EXPOSITION,  SAN  FRANCISCO. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


441 


stress  of  the  painter's  palate  and  mellow 
with  the  age  that  obliterates  even  a  sem- 
blance of  the  thought  behind  the  forms, 
this  blazing  beauty  of  color  is  rampant, 
a  carnival  of  the  "Painted  Desert,"  a 
morass  of  voluptuous  symphonies  of 
color,  the  expression  of  a  mind  drunk 
with  color.  What  a  powerful  pile 
this  would  be  were  there  an  architecture 
to  hold  it,  bind  it  together,  hammer  it 
down,  "put  it  over." 

However  we  may  be  impressed  with 
the  effect  of  color  in  architecture,  it  still 
remains  that  architecture  is  fundament- 
ally a  structural  vehicle.  The  color  ele- 
ment as  an  emotional  impulse  must  be 
subservient  to  the  thought  directing  ele- 
ment as  expressed  in  the  architectural 
form.  Where  the  color  element  is  pow- 
erful, the  form  element  must  be  still  more 
powerful,  else  we  have,  as  in  the  charac- 
teristic work  of  the  futurist,  dominant 
emotional  impressions,  unknowable  ef- 
florescence in  color. 

Taken  as  a  whole  the  exposition  must 
be  deemed  an  expression  in  color,  with- 
out adequate  architectural  accompani- 
ment. The  details  of  beauty  which  crowd 
upon  the  eye  at  each  step  do  not  affect 
the  general  value  of  this  statement. 

As  an  instance  of  a  happy  detail  we 
note  the  Horticultural  Building.  This 
work  of  Bakewell  and  Brown's  is  a  tour 
de  force  in  exposition  architecture.  It  is 
without  exception  the  most  electric,  the 
most  expressive,  effervescent  playful  bit 
of  joyous  architecture.  In  the  main  it 
expresses,  in  its  color,  a  most  wonderful 
and  delightful  restrained  exuberance,  and 
the  atmospheric  quality  is  charming ;  but 
the  color  imposed  has  in  places  converted 
the  detail  to  a  lavalike  deposit  of  un- 
meaning forms.  The  choice  detail — the 
fanciful  lines,  the  luxurious  efflorescence, 
particularly  of  the  lower  portions — is 
swallowed  up  in  the  pastel  vapors  of 
a  too  dominant  color  fancy.  In  this 
building  the  dominant  note  is  the  great 
glass  areas,  which  reflect  in  opalescent 
bluish  tones  the  prevailing  moods  of  the 
day  and  night.  The  architectural  forms 
are  handled  with  a  suggestion  of  the  jew- 
eler's art.  The  construction  and  the  set- 
ting of  the  various  parts  in  adequate 
structural  relation  are  graceful  and  free. 


Here  the  structural  aesthetic  values  of 
architecture  are  rightly  subservient  to 
purely  decorative  features,  the  structure 
being  implied.  Yet  so  cleverly  is  the 
whole  conceived  in  the  spirit  of  glass 
and  iron  and  ornamental  paste  that  the 
mind  is  satisfied,  while  the  emotional  ap- 
peal is  more  than  satisfactory — it  is  a 
joy.  Viewed  from  the  portals  of  Bacon's 
court,  this  building  is  a  jewel  of  jewels, 
the  quintessence  of  voluptuous,  sump- 
tuous, contained  joy. 

The  primary  relations  of  structural 
aesthetics,  even  in  exposition  architecture, 
are  dominant  factors.  A  more  or  less 
close  following  of  reasonable  structural 
values  is  necessary.  As  an  illustration  of 
misapplication  of  values,  we  note  the 
great  even-toned  greenish  domes,  which 
are  a  dominant  minor  chord  in  the 
scheme.  These  domes  top  perforated 
drums  whose  wall  surfaces  are  treated 
with  color  in  a  broken  design.  Here  we 
have  a  case  of  syncopation  in  values. 
The  even  color  of  the  dome  suggests 
a  monolithic  construction ;  the  drums, 
broken  up  by  bands  of  scintillant  mosaic 
color  areas,  suggest  a  wall  of  a  purely 
decorative  character.  To  have  pre- 
served the  effect  of  solidity  of  the  wall 
and  broken  the  roof,  would  have  been  a 
way  of  handling  the  situation  more  in 
accord  with  the  common  understanding 
of  the  likely  structural  condition.  Or  if 
the  solid  character  of  the  dome  was  an 
important  note  to  be  preserved,  why  sup- 
port it  on  a  member  which  by  its  treat- 
ment suggests  a  more  transient  type  of 
construction?  Under  the  present  ar- 
rangement we  see  the  strong  shadows  of 
the  perforations  entirely  surrounded  with 
opalescent  color  conditions,  resulting  thus 
in  an  unexplained  structure.  The  effect 
is  of  spots  of  dark  hanging  unsupported 
in  the  air;  the  color  values  of  walls  and 
dome  being  commensurate  with  the  sky 
values. 

Turning  to  more  prosaic  details,  one's 
eye  lifts  to  wide  expanses  of  livid  orna- 
ment, suspended  like  giant  tapestries  be- 
fore the  walls  of  towers  which  flank  the 
Court  of  Flowers.  Here  we  confess  our- 
selves ignorant  of  the  meaning,  and  our 
pov/ers  grow  faint  before  the  wizardry, 
the  "wine  of  wizardry,"  of  the  painter's 


442 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


palette.  Here  it  is  difficult  to  arrive  at 
the  point  of  view  of  the  colorist.  A  few 
questions  will  elucidate.  Why,  for  in- 
stance, has  color  been  applied  on  stone, 
on  exterior  wall  surfaces,  particularly  in 
a  diaper  pattern,  in  a  way  that  suggests 
oilcloth  or  a  brick  texture?  Great  ex- 
pense and  care  and  skill  have  been  ex- 
ercised in  imitating  a  stone  texture ;  and 
are  these  not  stone  forms  which  are  em- 
ployed in  adjacent  ornament?  Why 
have  these  suggested  surfaces  of  stone 
been  destroyed  as  such  by  the  coloring 
of  supposedly  stone  details  ?  Why  has  the 
illusion  of  stone,  of  permanency,  of  sta- 
bility, been  frustrated?  Is  it  more  im- 
portant that  a  composition  be  colored 
than  that  it  be  true  to  itself  ? 

A  natural  sequence  of  thought  in  archi- 
tectural composition  demands  that  the 
voids  find  expression  in  terms  corres- 
ponding to  the  wall  structure.  When 
this  is  not  done  a  manifest  confusion  in 
the  abstract  idea  results.  Why  are  the 
ornamental  openings  colored  so  that  they 
suggest  beautiful  masses  of  terra  cotta 
or  brick  or  plaster,  and  the  wall  areas 
next  treated  to  suggest  Travertine  stone? 

The  value  of  a  wall  surface,  either  ex- 
pressed in  flat  unbroken  areas  or  in  its 
extreme  phase  of  fenestration,  a  colon- 
nade, must  ultimately  reside  in  static 
qualities,  its  capacity  to  carry.  Why 
paint  a  stone  wall  pink?  Are  there  any 
pink,  real  pink,  face-powder  pink,  stone 
walls  anywhere?  And,  if  there  are,  do 
we  need  them  here  ? 

Whatever  of  decoration  in  color  is 
used  on  a  wall,  the  quality  of  stability 
and  permanence  should  manifestly  not  be 
abased.  And  the  detail  in  color  should 
synchronize  in  character  with  the  sup- 
posed wall  material.  A  stenciled  dec- 
oration on  a  plaster  wall  which  has  the 
texture  and  color  of  stone,  and  is  sup- 
posed to  look  like  stone,  should  be  sten- 
ciled, if  at  all,  to  recall  some  sort  of  stone 
decoration,  and  not  in  imitation  of  the 
texture  of  a  brick  wall  or  of  a  plastered 
surface. 

A  wall  is  primarily  the  reposeful  ele- 
ment in  an  architectural  composition. 
When  a  decorative  effect  is  desired  in  a 
wall,  the  wall  surfaces  should  still  indi- 
cate more  of  repose  than  the  local  dec- 


oration of  the  voids.  A  highly  decorated 
wall  surface  having  a  high  key  of  color 
value  must  fail  in  its  structural  value  as 
a  wall,  i.  e.,  a  carrying  member,  unless  it 
is  subservient  to  still  more  colorful  active 
interest  producing  elements  at  the  open- 
ings. The  openings  should  be  accented 
with  ornament,  powerful,  impelling, 
thought-directing,  of  sufficient  force  to 
dominate  the  color  condition  in  the  wall. 

Because  the  architecture  of  the  expo- 
sition has  been  designed  by  men  for  the 
most  part  necessarily  without  the  super- 
lative color  sense  of  a  Guerin,  the  archi- 
tectural forms  express  less  of  activity 
and  power  than  the  color  phase.  In  gen- 
eral, the  main  architectural  lines  of  the 
buildings  and  the  minor  forms  and  the 
details  have,  through  the  juxtaposition  of 
the  color  of  applied  pigments,  dwindled, 
shrunken  and  become  enfeebled  by  the 
contrasts  thus  imposed  upon  them.  The 
abstract  message  of  the  architecture  is 
submerged  in  the  emotional  power  of  the 
color  values  with  which  they  are  sur- 
feited. 

This  brings  us  to  the  idea  of  the  true 
relation  of  color  to  architecture.  Color 
in  architecture  is  not  the  end;  it  is  the 
beginning  of  an  architectural  composi- 
tion. Color  is  the  reservoir,  the  ocean, 
the  garden,  from  which  must  spring  the 
bud  and  flower  of  the  architect's  thought ; 
just  as  in  literature  the  thought  is  more 
important  than  the  verbiage  with  which 
the  thought  is  clothed;  as  in  music  the 
theme  is  more  important  than  the  ren- 
dering of  the  tone  values ;  and  as  in 
sculpture  the  abstract  quality  is  more 
important  than  the  vehicle. 

Color  in  architecture  signifies  not  so 
much  the  covering  of  architectural  forms 
with  pigment,  or  the  use  of  highly  col- 
ored materials,  as  it  means  that  fine  ad- 
justment of  shade  and  shadow  which 
suggests  color.  To  him  who  is  sensitive 
to  color  a  work  of  architecture  is  an  ar- 
rangement of  color  values  under  any 
circumstances. 

Comparative  views  of  the  buildings 
taken  when  they  were  in  the  Travertine 
stone  and  afterward,  when  ornamented 
with  color,  are,  of  course,  only  sugges- 
tions of  the  true  condition.  However, 
they  serve  to  show  that  the  application  of 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


443 


pigments  which  darken  the  general  effect 
tend  to  destroy  the  direction  and  force 
of  architectural  detail.  It  would,  there- 
fore, appear  that  the  colorist  should  be 
the  architect,  or  vice  versa,  in  order  that 
the  color  values  should  be  nicely  adjusted 
to  the  architectural  forms. 

Paul  Bartlett,  the  sculptor,  once  said 
in  one  of  his  classes,  "A  great  artist 
could  make  a  thing  of  beauty  of  an  ele- 
phant, even  though  he  had  never  seen 
an  elephant  and  knew  nothing  of  its  an- 
atomy," illustrating  that  the  poise  and 
swing  of  line,  the  balance  and  power  of 
composition,  were  aesthetic  powers  with- 
in the  scope  of  the  sculptor  and  superior 
as  elements  of  expression  to  mere  de- 
tails of  fact  in  anatomy.  And  undoubt- 
edly a  master  in  color,  such  as  this  mag- 
nificent spectacle  proves  Guerin  to  be, 
may  have  the  power  to  compose  a  won- 
derful composition  in  color,  using  as  his 
canvas  the  buildings  and  entourage  of  an 
international  exposition,  without  a  spe- 
cific knowledge  of  architecture.  But  are 
we  not  entitled  to  expect  more  than  a 
color  composition,  just  as  in  an  eques- 
trian statue  we  expect  the  saddle  girts  to 
be  in  place,  no  matter  what  the  charm 
of  rendering  otherwise?  In  short,  we 
should  expect  to  find  not  only  color  in  all 
its  glories,  but  an  unrivaled  display  of 
fine  aesthetic  values  of  line  and  form  as 
well.  And  we  are  justified  in  looking  for 
a  harmony  of  these  various  elements, 
which,  combined,  constitute  the  art  of 
architecture.  That  we  do  not  find  this 
balance  is  explained  only  by  the  fact  that 
no  one  personality  was  available  who 
combined  all  the  qualities  of  an  architect. 

In  the  results  before  our  eyes  not  a  sin- 
gle titanic  form  announces  itself,  not  a 
line  in  electric,  elastic  vehemence  cleaves 
the  sky  without  deterrent  color  accom- 
paniment. No  profile  as  such  feels  its- 
way  into  the  mind  as  a  line  of  beauty,  no 
group  of  statuary  pulls  itself  into  vol- 
canic activity  to  acclaim  its  sculptured 
message — all  is  under  the  exotic  pall  of 
color.  The  charmed  curves  of  Corin- 
thian capital  and  the  stately  fluted 
columns  stand  rank  on  rank,  flattened 
like  colored  paper  strips  set  against  other 
colored  paper  backgrounds. 

There  are  exceptions  to  this  general 


sacrifice  of  architecture  on  the  altar  of 
color.  In  the  Court  of  Seasons  whilst 
looking  out  toward  the  sea  between  Ba- 
con's titan  columns,  which  in  solemn 
grandeur  proclaim  the  dignity  and  benefi- 
cence of  nature's  bounty,  one  notes  the 
lilt  and  lift  of  the  graceful  statue  of  Miss 
Longman  in  splendid  joyous  abandon — a 
bit  of  beautiful  line  in  silhouette  against 
the  sky.  The  contrast  of  this  statue  with 
the  vistas  of  advancing  ranks  of  the  col- 
umns on  either  side  is  altogether  fine. 
Here  is  a  picture  of  classic  repose,  unde- 
filed  by  more  gorgeous  counterpart  than 
that  given  by  earth  and  sky  and  sea.  This 
Court  of  the  Seasons,  its  pavements  un- 
broken save  by  the  level  waters  of  a 
green  bordered  pool,  stands  alone  as  be- 
ing free  from  unsympathetic  treatments 
of  its  garden  areas.  Except  for  the  great 
central  apsidal  feature  on  the  main  axis, 
which  protrudes  a  foreign  note  where 
Faville's  door  and  apse  form  the  enclos- 
ing feature  of  the  great  central  arch,  the 
court  stands  complete  as  its  architect  con- 
ceived it.  Here  the  Travertine  stone 
dominates  the  color  scheme.  Occasion- 
ally where  color  has  been  applied,  as  on 
the  ornamental  wreaths,  giving  an  effect 
of  stencil  or  intaglio,  the  values  of  the 
architect  have  been  frustrated.  The 
sculptured  groups  of  this  court  are  in 
harmony  with  the  solid  dignity  of  the 
architectural  forms.  Many  will  feel  that 
this  court  is  more  nearly  a  complete  ex- 
pression of  mature  classical  thought  and 
feeling  than  anything  in  the  exposition. 
Certainly  it  has  repose  and  dignity,  and 
great  charm — beautiful  proportions  and 
the  absence  of  unfriendly  color  domi- 
nance. 

One  other  line  of  pure  delight  there  is 
which,  like  the  statue  in  Bacon's  Court, 
must  live  in  the  memory.  It  is  the  en- 
tasis of  the  columns  in  the  colonnaded 
porches  of  the  Pennsylvania  building. 
We  met  this  line  just  after  passing 
through  the  fiery  furnace  of  color  which 
encompasses  the  Art  Palace.  We  had 
just  said  "good  bye"  to  the  lovely  Greek 
ladies,  who  turn  classic  backs  upon  our 
upturned  faces,  and  to  the  cool,  refresh- 
ing, satisfying  walls  of  the  California 
Building,  when  looking  past  the  elegant 
refinement  and  opulence  of  New  York, 


444 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


we  met  some  old  friends — Indepen- 
dence Hall,  the  New  Jersey  Building, 
and  the  State  House  of  Boston,  and 
others.  Greetings,  ye  gentle  reminders 
of  the  Colonial  age!  The  fine  grace  of 
these  simple  lines,  these  forms  unafraid 
to  dare  the  blue  of  Western  skies  in  the 
garb  of  ancient  renown,  greets  our  eyes 
now  surfeited  with  color.  Like  a  sweet 
message  of  ancestral  days  these  delight- 
fully frank  architectural  fragments  bring 
a  realization  of  our  real  self.  These  de- 
clare our  time  and  temperament ;  these, 
our  race  and  religion,  our  birthright, 
and  perhaps  our  future.  The  exotic  ful- 
minate of  riotous  Roman  architecture 
and  "Cairo"  coloring  possess  us  no  more. 
We  pass  as  in  a  dream  into  the  calm  reali- 
zation of  the  old  gold  dome  of  the  Boston 
State  House,  and  we  ask  the  question,  Is 
it  the  ideals  of  Patrick  Henry  and  of 
Hamilton  and  of  the  Adams  family  and 
of  Franklin,  or  is  it  the  lure  of  the  Occi- 
dent, the  voluptuary,  the  sensualist,  the 
ocultist,  and  the  seers  and  precepts  of 
the  East — the  "line"  or  the  "color"- 
which  holds  us  truest  to  our  ideals?  Go 
and  sit  beside  the  fires  of  Brangwyn's 
pictures  amid  the  calm  of  Creation's 
Court,  and  think  a  while,  then  out  by  the 
sea,  alone  beside  these  landmarks  of  your 
ancient  home.  The  tides  that  wash  on 
Pacific  shores  wet  now  the  feet  of  the  Pil- 
grims' sons.  Are  the  eyes  of  these  sons 
lifted  to  the  prismatic  colors  of  the  Ori- 
ent or  are  they  stayed  by  the  subtle 
beauties  of  restraint?  Or  do  we  look 
for  a  future  day  when  into  the  old 
shall  have  been  breathed  the  breath  of 
the  new,  when  these  Eastern  fires  shall 
have  been  tempered,  when  these  exotic 
flashings  of  emotional  energy  shall  have 
been  curbed  by  the  steeled  minds  of  the 
West,  and  chilled  into  finely  wrought  ex- 
pressions of  a  superman. 

Return  again  to  the  Court  of  Creation 
and  there  you  will  see  more  nearly  than 
elsewhere  in  this  forest  of  pageantry  a 


realization  of  a  dream  come  true — 
Brangwyn's  pictures  and  Mullgardt's 
court.  Here,  a  true  blending  of  Eastern 
spirit  with  Western  restraint,  of  South- 
ern color  with  Northern  lights,  a  med- 
ley vocal  with  the  churning  together  of 
rival  races,  of  strident  woes,  a  light  from 
the  burning  torch  of  progress. 

For  this  alone  the  entire  effort  of  the 
exposition  is  worth  while,  for  this  work 
signals  a  spiritual  growth,  an  aspirational 
force,  a  capacity  for  expression  in  the  ab- 
stract. 

Of  the  work  of  Jules  Guerin  it  may 
truly  be  said  that,  whilst  his  work  has 
been  Goliath-like  in  that  he  has  brought 
the  temples  of  beauty  down  about  our 
heads,  he  has  nevertheless  given  the 
world  the  greatest  demonstration  of  the 
uses  of  color  in  exposition  architecture 
with  which  our  time  has  been  favored. 
All  the  compliment  which  word  could 
convey  for  the  boldness  and  sincerity  and 
harmony  of  his  work  is  due. 

The  structural  aesthetics  of  color,  still 
veiled  and  sphinx-like,  awaits  the  advent 
of  architects  who  are  colorists.  Stanford 
White  thought  in  color,  by  the  way,  and 
his  work  is  the  proof. 

However  immaterial  and  irrelevant 
criticism  of  a  work  so  generally  lovely 
may  appear,  we  are  bound  to  recognize 
in  each  advance  step  in  art  a  stepping 
stone  to  something  greater.  This  work 
in  color  at  the  exposition  seems  to  pres- 
age not  only  a  wider  appreciation  of 
color  in  its  application  to  architectural 
problems,  but  a  demand  on  the  part  of 
•  the  public  for  a  more  precise  knowledge 
of  the  use  of  color  by  architects. 

The  day  is  not  far  distant,  we  feel, 
when  the  architect  shall  be  required  to 
know  not  only  the  law  of  the  forms 
which  he  employs  but  the  law  of  color 
harmony  as  well,  when,  like  Michael 
Angelo,  he  shall  be  required  to  wield  the 
brush  and  the  sculptor's  chisel  as  well  as 
the  builder's  square. 


THE  NORTON  HOUSE,  GOSHEN,  CONN.    AN  EXCELLENT  TYPE  OF  COLONIAL  WORK. 

COLONIAL  QAR.CHITECTVR.E 
IN  COHHECTICVT 

Text  and  Measured  Drawings 
<£herwood  Bessell 


PART   II. 


THE  Norton  house  at  Goshen  was 
built  when  Colonial  architecture 
was  at  the  height  of  its  refinement, 
a  circumstance  reflected  in  the  quality 
of  its  mouldings.  The  house  stands  upon 
a  knoll  overlooking  the  valleys  in  all  di- 
rections, and  was  probably  erected  when 
Goshen  expected  to  become  the  county 
seat  instead  of  Litchfield.  The  country 
about  it  still  retains  the  quiet  of  a  primi- 
tive settlement. 

The  bricks  for  the  house  were  evident- 
ly made  on  the  ground.  Their  colors  are 
exquisite,  running  from  light  salmon  to 
rich  dark  reds,  from  straw  color  to  dark 
golden  browns,  from  light  blue  tints  to 
dark  purple  and  brown.  The  time  has 


gone  by  for  such  hand-made  bricks,  and 
we  can  hope  only  to  approximate  their 
beauty  in  our  machine  made  product. 

The  cornice  of  the  house  is  well  pro- 
portioned, and  very  carefully  ornamented 
by  means  of  slight  sinkages  and  cutouts. 

The  treatment,  in  relation  to  the  house, 
of  the  living  porch,  with  its  row  of  two- 
story  columns  and  stone  flooring,  cannot 
be  too  highly  commended.  Why  not 
try  something  of  this  character  to-day 
instead  of  our  weak  solution  of  this  prob- 
lem? Modern  porches  never  seem  to  be 
a  part  of  the  house,  but  an  afterthought. 

The  two  houses  at  Litchfield,  the  But- 
ler and  the  Tallmadge  house,  also  show 
the  way  for  a  quaint  and  honest  handling 


446 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


THE  TALLMADGE  HOUSE,  BUILT  IN  1775,  LITCHFIELD,  CONN.    THE  FRONT  DOOR  IS  OF 

LATER  DATE. 


of  the  question ;  their  porches  are  a  part 
of  the  house,  a  part  of  the  whole  design, 
and  are  very  pleasing  in  appearance.  In 
both  instances  the  porches  were  added 
after  the  house  had  been  built.  Col.  Tall- 
madge  erected  his  after  a  visit  to  Wash- 
ington at  Mt.  Vernon ;  the  porch  on  the 
south  end  was  built  first,  later  the  north 
one  was  added.  The  south  one  contains 
three  columns  on  the  side  and  is  of  a 
greater  depth  than  the  north  one,  which 
has  only  two  columns.  The  space  saved 
gave  more  room  inside  for  a  closet  which 
contained  a  small  stairway  to  the  tipper 
room,  the  opening  and  markings  still  be- 
ing traceable. 

The  Tallmadge  house  was  at  one  time 
a  tavern,  and  the  south  end  was  the  of- 
fice. One  large  room  upstairs  was  used 
as  a  ballroom,  running  through  the  house 
on  the  north  side.  It  has  since  been 
changed  into  two  rooms  of  a  goodly  size. 
Unfortunately,  the  present  front  door  is 
not  the  original  one,  but  it  is  said  to  have 
been  similar  to  the  one  shown  in  the 
drawing  of  this  house  published  on  page 
360  in  the  April  number  of  the  Architec- 


tural Record.  The  handling  of  the  roofs 
of  these  additions  in  connection  with  the 
main  house  is  unique,  and  worth  study- 
ing, as  is  also  the  balustrade  on  the  roof. 

The  Butler  house  likewise  solved  in  a 
very  pleasing  manner  the  question  of  the 
porch,  which  also  is  a  later  addition.  The 
deliberate  manner  of  placement  relative 
to  the  main  house  is  much  to  be  admired. 
We  are  afraid  to  do  a  thing  of  this  kind 
to-day,  simply  because  of  some  biased 
criticism ;  we  lack  the  moral  courage  of 
our  convictions,  and,  I  am  convinced,  al- 
low many  charming  ideas  to  go  by.  Here 
the  face  of  the  columns  extends  beyond 
the  face  of  the  main  building,  and  the 
cornice  is  let  die  into  the  old  house  at 
will.  The  detail  is  refined,  and  shows 
that  careful  study  was  given  to  the  exe- 
cution of  the  work.  The  house  proper 
was  built  in  1792  by  Charles  Butler,  and 
the  addition  early  in  the  nineteenth  cen- 
tury. 

On  this  same  street  and  in  the  same 
town  of  Litchfield  may  be  found  numer- 
ous old  Colonial  homes.  Just  above  the 
Tallmadge  house  is  the  old  Sheldon  Tav- 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


447 


ern,  now  a  private  residence.  Entirely 
different  from  the  houses  mentioned 
above,  it  was  built  in  1760  and  shows  de- 
cided earmarks  of  English  influence ;  but 
it  is  more  refined  in  detail  than  the  ma- 
jority of  houses  in  which  English  ascen- 
dency is  felt.  It  was  built  by  Elisha 
Sheldon,  and  it  was  not  until  the  next 
generation  that  it  became  a  tavern,  run 
by  the  son.  Later  here  also  lived  Gen- 
eral Uriah  Tracey,  and  still  later  Judge 
James  Gould,  famous  for  his  work 
known  as  "Gould's  Pleading."  The 
mouldings  of  the  cornice  are  coarse  and 
heavy  and  out  of  scale  with  other  details 
on  the  house,  but  here  we  have  those 
charming  dormers  of  an  attenuated  feel- 
ing so  seldom  seen,  the  jambs  being  only 
of  a  width  necessary  for  construction. 
The  roof  line  shows  a  marked  change 
from  the  general  type,  but  still  is  rather 
desired  than  otherwise  for  the  balance  of 
the  design. 

Almost  opposite  is  the  Julius  Deming 
house,  built  in  1793,  and  designed  by 
Wm.  Spratt,  a  Scotch  architect,  wrong- 
ly thought  to  be  a  Hessian.  This  house 


is  similar  in  design  to  the  Sheldon,  but 
decidedly  coarser  in  detail. 

A  very  good  and  simply  designed 
house  is  the  Seymour  homestead,  built  in 
1807  for  Ozias  Seymour,  and  one  could 
ask  to-day  for  nothing  more  desirable ; 
with  the  application  of  a  more  delicate 
or  refined  balustrade  and  cornice  this 
house  has  a  quality  not  to  be  lightly 
passed  by. 

The  Reeves  house,  built  in  1773  by 
Tapping  Reeves,  brother-in-law  of  Aaron 
Burr,  shows  another  treatment  of  the 
roof  problem  very  seldom  seen.  We  can- 
not say  it  is  good,  but  there  is  the  very 
excellent  treatment  of  a  wood  grill  in 
the  frieze  of  the  main  cornice,  used  as 
windows  and  ventilators  for  the  attic 
floor.  The  porch  and  addition  on  the  side 
are  of  a  later  date,  and,  as  before  stated, 
it  is  difficult  to  obtain  a  picture  of  the 
house  as  originally  designed. 

The  bank  building  at  Litchfield  is  of 
merit.  By  a  close  study  of  the  cornice 
and  pediment  one  notes  the  alternating 
circular  and  rectangular  raised  panels 
between  the  triglyphs,  also  the  very  in- 


THE  BUTLER  HOUSE,  BUILT  IN  1792,  LITCHFIELD,  CONN.    A  FINE  EXAMPLE 
WHICH  SURVIVES  IN  ITS  ORIGINAL  STATE. 


44S 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


THE  SHELDON  HOUSE,  BUILT-IN  1760,  LITCHFIELD,  CONN.    AT  THE  SIDE  IS  A  "WITCH"  DOOR. 


THE  SEYMOUR  HOMESTEAD,  BUILT  IN  1807,  LITCHFIELD,  CONN. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


449 


THE  REEVES  HOUSE,  BUILT  IN  1773,  LITCHFIELD,  CONN.,  OFTEN  VISITED  BY  AARON  BURR. 


THE  BANK,  BUILT  EARLY  IN  THE  NINETEENTH  CENTURY,  LITCHFIELD,  CONN. 


450 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


-WINDOW-IN-THL- 

OLIVta-WOLCOTT- 

H0  U  5  E.-LJTCH  FIELD-CON  N- 


D  ETA1 L-  0P-H  EAD-AT-A  - 


/ 

'-A- 

I/.             4*            4*  . 

•DETAIL-  X 

-or-  -   -f 

•SILL-    -^ 

-AT-B-    • 


DLTAILOF 
WINDOW-HEAD-ON-THt- 
WOOD  BUFF*  HOU/E-UTCH  FIELD- 

CONN: 


'^SECTION. 


DETAIL  OF- 
. I -BLIND  5LAT5' 


MEASURED  AND  DRAWN  BY  WESLEY  SHERWOOD  BESSELL. 


teresting  motive  used  in  the  pediment  for 
a  frieze,  the  ornamented  oval  window 
frame  and  the  peculiar  panelling  below 
the  first  story  windows.  Before  the  ad- 
dition on  the  side  was  made,  a  quaint 
outside  spiral  iron  stairway  led  from  the 
ground  to  the  second  floor. 

Another  form  of  construction  and  de- 
sign is  shown  by  the  house  at  Windsor, 
the  doorway  reproducing  the  pediment  of 
the  house,  but  still  retaining  the  greatest 
interest.  This  is  an  exquisite  door,  and, 
.together  with  the  windows,  exceptional- 
ly well  placed  on  the  facade.  The  fence 
is  of  a  typical  Colonial  design,  and,  with- 
out the  porch  at  the  side,  this  composition 
would  be  well  worth  a  reproduction  to- 
day. 

The  Cowles  house  at  Farmington  is  a 
large  house,  designed  for  one  of  apparent 
wealth,  and  yet  not  over  pretentious.  It 


shows  a  tendency  toward  the  southern 
type  of  Colonial  architecture,  something 
unexpected  and  unlocked  for  in  Connec- 
ticut. The  sloping  ground  gave  occasion 
for  an  interesting  porch  treatment.  The 
brick  arches  of  a  single  brick  header 
shows  that  it  supports  only  a  porch  floor, 
the  crown  of  the  arch  being  almost  level 
with  the  floor.  The  five  columns  are  of 
brownstone,  procured  probably  from  the 
old  brownstone  quarries  at  Portland,  not 
far  distant  from  Farmington.  The  brick 
is  at  present  covered  with  a  light  paint. 
A  peculiar  feature  is  the  column  in  the 
center  of  the  pediment,  with  the  Paladian 
window  treatment  over  this  column,  a 
treatment  very  seldom  seen.  The  Pala- 
dian window  is  decidedly  poor,  but,  taken 
as  a  whole,  the  design  is  good,  especially 
the  front,  with  a  very  odd  but  pleasing 
front  door. 


W 
<  M 


H 


D  W 

OT  ,J 

w  w 


452 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


A  HOUSE  AT  WINDSOR,  CONN. 


The  construction  and  design  of  win- 
dows varied  much ;  there  are  some  with 
.a    full     pediment    at    the    head,     some 
with  the  broken  pediment,  others  with  a 
-full   cornice   treatment,   and   still   others 
with  just  a  few  crown  mouldings.     The 
;  sashes  never  hung  by  weights,  but  were 
•caught  by  pins  let  through  the  sash  into 
the  jamb;  sashes  were  of  the  small  light 
type,   and    all    muntins    rather   delicate 
than  coarse  or  heavy.     Sometimes  a  stiff 
metal  was  used  in  the  very  small  mun- 
tins.   The  rails  were  generally  an  inch  to 
an  inch  and  a  half  in  width,  the  sashes 
themselves  usually  being  one  and  one- 
.half  inches  thick. 

The  detail  drawings  show  three  types 
'of  these  window  heads,  and  also  the  typi- 
cal blind  construction.  The  blind  hard- 
'ware  varied  and  was  often  made  by 
•the  village  blacksmith. 


Windows  never  were  placed  in  double 
or  triple  formation,  except  as  a  Paladian 
motive,  and  bay  windows  were  not  used 
as  a  means  of  exterior  or  interior  fea- 
ture. These  two  facts  show  clearly  why 
everything  was  so  very  simple.  Limited 
to  just  single  windows  and  a  door,  there 
would  be  no  reason  to  expect  anything 
but  severity  of  design ;  but  to  these  add 
bay  windows  and  large  window  open- 
ings, and  immediately  the  thing  is  lost 
so  far  as  pure  Colonial  design  is 
concerned.  They  belong  to  our  English 
cousins'  beautiful,  rambling  farm  cot- 
tages and  manor  houses. 

The  blinds  of  a  house  add  the  final 
color  touch  and  finish.  Unfortunately, 
one  seldom  sees  this  feature  on  a  modern 
adaptation  of  the  Colonial  doorways,  and 
here  is  just  where  to  obtain  that  naive 
quality  which  we  have  lost. 


THE 


UEL  HANMAFOIHD 


BEFORE  plans  were  drawn  for  the 
new  General  Hospital,  just  opened 
in  Cincinnati,  Ohio,  a  commission 
of  specialists  inspected  all  the  notable 
modern  hospitals  in  the  United  States 
and  Europe,  with  the  result  that  the 
group  of  buildings  comprising  this  in- 
stitution, for  which  the  city  has  spent 
nearly  four  millions  of  dollars,  embod- 
ies the  very  'latest  and  most  approved 
methods  of  hospital  construction  and 
management.  The  General  Hospital  is 
a  municipal  hospital  for  the  city's  poor. 
It  contains  forty-two  wards,  employs 
more  than  600  persons,  and  is  situated 
on  a  tract  of  sixty-five  acres  in  the  sub- 
urb of  Mt.  Auburn,  on  a  high  plateau 
removed  from  the  smoky  downtown 
business  district,  but  lying  almost  in  the 
center  of  the  territory  bounded  by  the 
corporation  line.  The  buildings  which 
have  been  already  erected  are  so  built 
that  the  future  expansion  of  the  institu- 
tion is  taken  care  of ;  additional  buildings 
may  be  connected  up  with  the  power 
plant  and  other  common  utilities  as  the 
future  growth  of  the  city  demands. 

The  buildings  already  occupied  are 
the  administration  building,  the  receiv- 
ing ward,  the  outdoor  clinic,  seven  ward 
buildings,  the  operating  pavilion,  the 
kitchen,  the  dining  hall,  the  men's  dor- 
mitory, the  detention  ward,  the  power 
plant,  the  laundry,  the  garage,  the  staj 
ble,  the  female  dormitory,  the  nurses' 
home,  and  the  pathological  building. 

To  the  northwest  of  this  main  group 
is  a  smaller  group  of  six  buildings,  a 
separate  hospital  in  itself,  where  all  con- 
tagious diseases  are  treated.  In  this 
group  is  an  administration  building,  a 
nurses'  home,  a  detention  ward  building, 
and  three  ward  buildings.  There  is  also 


under  way  a  special  building  where  spe- 
cial contagious  diseases,  such  as  small- 
pox, will  be  treated. 

The  natural  and  graded  slope  of  the 
land  is  such  that  the  more  important 
ward  and  administration  buildings  oc- 
cupy the  higher  part  of  the  site,  which 
has  about  a  one  per  cent,  slope;  thus,  in 
time,  the  power  plant,  stables  and  gar- 
ages and  the  like  may  be  almost  entirely- 
screened  from  view  from  the  main  build- 
ings, by  proper  parking  and  planting. 

The  highest  point  in  the  tract  is  at 
Burnet  avenue,  upon  which  the  more 
important  of  the  buildings  front.  It  is 
about  fifty  feet  higher  than  the  west 
boundary,  yet  each  building  is  connected 
with  the  others  by  an  underground  tun- 
nel, so  that  it  is  possible  to  pass  from 
one  to  another  without  going  outdoors.. 

The  buildings,  though  plain,  are  well 
proportioned  and  dignified.  The  very- 
best  of  construction  has  been  employed. 
All  buildings  are  as  nearly  fireproof  as 
it  was  possible  to  make  them.  Founda- 
tions are  of  concrete,  waterproofed  and" 
underdrained.  The  exterior  walls  are 
of  brick,  faced  on  the  outside  with  a 
warm,  brown-toned  impervious  pressed 
brick,  thoroughly  waterproofed.  The 
trimmings  are  of  white  Bedford  stone.. 
Floor  and  roof  constructions  are  of  rein- 
forced concrete,  and  most  of  the  floors; 
are  finished  in  tile,  with  bases  of  ter- 
razzo.  The  details  of  the  interior  fin- 
ish in  every  part  have  been  carefully 
studied.  All  angles  are  rounded,  and 
everything  has  been  done  to  make  the 
buildings  easily  cleanable.  There  is  no. 
interior  window  trim  or  finish  around' 
doors  and  windows.  The  base  and  door 
frames  are  set  flush  with  the  finished 
plaster  faces  of  the  walls.  Door  frames; 


454 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


A  V  E./1  V 


LWAB.D    "tk  ]       ^  >""«—[ 

—        LJ^     J     "Kovwq 


VIEW    AND    GROUP    PLAN    OF    THE    NEW 
GENERAL     HOSPITAL,     CINCINNATI,     OHIO. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


455 


are  of  steel,  and  all  passageways  are 
provided  with  steel  guard  plates  set 
flush  with  the  plastering. 

A  hot  water  system  of  heating  is  em- 
ployed, with  direct  radiation.  Ventila- 
tion is  provided  in  all  ward  buildings 
by  means  of  fans,  one  for  supply  and 
one  for  exhaust  in  each  ward.  The  air 
is  thoroughly  screened,  washed  and  hu- 
midified before  being  distributed  in  the 
wards. 

Plumbing  fixtures  were  made  of  spe- 
cial design.  All  the  pipe  work  is  of 
brass,-  and  everything  is  so  constructed 
that  it  can  easily  be  cleaned  and  re- 
paired. Plumbing  fixtures  are  of  vitre- 
ous ware,  with  nickel  trimmings. 

Realizing  that  fresh  air  is  of  the  ut- 
most importance  in  the  treatment  of  the 
sick,  each  ward  building  has  on  its  roof 
an  open  ward,  where  patients  may  live 
in  the  open.  These  open  roof  wards  are 
provided  with  awnings  for  protection 
against  rain  and  sun.  They  are  also 
provided  with  toilet  rooms  and  ward 
kitchens.  All  the  roof  wards,  porches 
and  covered  ways  are  paved  with  red 
quarry  tile;  flashings  and  sheet  metal 
work  throughout  are  of  copper. 

The  main  administration  building 
faces  on  Burnet  avenue.  In  it  are  the 
offices  of  the  Superintendent  and  his  as- 
sistants, the  main  business  offices,  the 
record  rooms  and  the  quarters  for  the 
staff  of  physicians  and  internes.  At  the 
south  end,  on  the  first  floor,  is  a  large 
library,  in  which  will  be  housed  a  very 
valuable  collection  of  reference  books. 
At  the  north  end  of  the  building  is  a 
lecture  room,  in  which  medical  societies 
will  hold  their  meetings.  In  this  build- 
ing also  are  the  central  telephone  ex- 
change and  switchboard  for  signal  ser- 
vice, which  connects  with  every  bed  in  the 
various  wards,  so  that  at  all  times  the 
condition  of  each  patient  can  be  imme- 
diately telautographed  to  headquarters. 
Besides  having  this  wonderful  system  of 
telautography,  all  buildings,  wards,  and 
departments  are  connected  with  inter- 
communicating telephones. 

On  the  upper  floors  of  the  adminis- 
tration building  will  be  sleeping  rooms 
for  internes  and  house  physicians.  At 
the  south  end  of  the  second  floor  is  a 


suite  set  aside  for  the  Superintendent. 
Recreation  and  sitting  rooms  are  also 
provided  for  physicians  and  internes  on 
this  floor.  The  central  portion  of  this 
building  is  three  stories  in  height,  while 
the  north  and  south  wings  are  two 
stories,  with  roof  gardens  over  them  for 
the  use  of  the  occupants  of  the  building. 

One  unusual  thing  about  all  the  ele- 
vators in  ward  buildings  is  that  they  are 
placed  in  separate  towers,  isolated  from 
each  other  and  from  each  floor,  so  that 
there  is  no  direct  connection  between 
wards  that  are  placed  one  above  the 
other.  This  feature  is  carried  out  in  all 
the  buildings,  in  order  to  prevent  any 
possible  chance  of  cross-infection.  The 
idea  is  also  applied  to  all  clothes  chutes. 

The  buildings  in  the  contagious  group 
lie  to  the  northwest  of  the  main  group. 
They  differ  in  construction,  insomuch 
that  they  are  only  two  stories  high;  the 
wards  also  are  somewhat  smaller,  hav- 
ing a  capacity  of  sixteen  beds  each. 

The  operating  pavilion  lies  west  of 
the  receiving  ward.  It  has  five  operat- 
ing rooms,  two  on  the  first  floor  and 
three  on  the  second.  These  are  connect- 
ed with  the  etherizing  and  sterilizing 
rooms,  the  nurses'  workrooms,  etc.  In 
the  basement  of  the  building  is  the  big 
drug-room  and  storeroom  for  drugs.  A 
complete  X-ray  department,  with  photo- 
graphic dark-rooms,  is  also  in  this  base- 
ment. A  large  amphitheater  is  located 
in  the  east  end  of  the  building.  It  is  to 
be  used  as  a  lecture  and  demonstration 
room.  It  contains  very  large  and  spe- 
cially built  moving  picture  and  lantern 
projection  machines.  The  amphitheater 
is  cut  off  from  the  operating  portion  of 
the  pavilion,  there  being  no  communica- 
tion between  the  two. 

Immediately  behind  the  operating  pa- 
vilion is  the  kitchen  building.  This 
structure  stands  almost  in  the  center  of 
the  group  of  ward  buildings,  where  all 
wards  may  be  served  most  conveniently. 
The  big  kitchen  occupies  the  first  and 
main  floor.  The  basement  contains  an 
ice  plant,  cold  storage  warerooms,  and 
a  large  space  for  sterilization  of  food 
boxes  used  by  the  oatients. 

In  the  power  building  are  now  located 
six  of  a  battery  of  twelve  water  tube 


456 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


ADMINISTRATION     BUILDING-NEW    GENERAL    HOSPITAL,    CINCINNATI.    OHIO. 
Samuel  Hannaford  &  Sons,  Architects. 


WARD  BUILDING   "A"— THE   NEW   GENERAL  HOSPITAL,   CINCINNATI,   OHIO. 
Samuel  Hannaford  &  Sons,  Architects. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


457 


WARD  BUILDINGS  "C"  AND  "B"-THE  NEW  GENERAL  HOSPITAL,  CINCINNATI,  OHIO. 
Samuel  Hannaford  &  Sons,  Architects. 


WARD  BUILDINGS  "H"  AND  "J"-THE  NEW  GENERAL  HOSPITAL,  CINCINNATI,  OHIO. 
Samuel  Hannaford  &  Sons,  Architects. 


458 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


REAR  VIEW,  WARD  BUILDINGS  "J"  AND  "K"-THE  NEW  GENERAL  HOSPITAL,  CINCINNATI,  OHIO. 

Samuel  Hannaford  &  Sons,  Architects. 


OPEN-AIR  WARD.  ON  ROOF  OF  EACH  WARD  BUILDING-THE  NEW  GENERAL  HOSPITAL, 

CINCINNATI,  OHIO. 
Samuel  Hannaford  &  Sons,  Architects. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


459 


INTERIOR  OF  ONE  OF  THE  WARD  BUILDINGS— THE  NEW  GENERAL  HOSPITAL,  CINCINNATI,  OHIO. 

Samuel  Hannaford  &  Sons,  Architects. 


ONE  OF  THE  OPERATING  ROOMS— THE  NEW  GENERAL  HOSPITAL,  CINCINNATI,  OHIO. 
Samuel  Hannaford  &  Sons,  Architects. 


460 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


ONE  OF  THE  OPERATING  PAVILIONS-THE  NEW  GENERAL  HOSPITAL,  CINCINNATI.  OHIO. 
Samuel  Hannaford  &  Sons,  Architects. 


NURSES'  HOME  BUILDING-THE  NEW  GENERAL  HOSPITAL,  CINCINNATI,  OHIO. 
Samuel  Hannaford  &  Sons,  Architects. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


461 


COVERED  ROOF-GARDEN  ON  NURSES'   HOME   BUILDING-THE  NEW   GENERAL  HOSPITAL, 

CINCINNATI,  OHIO. 
Samuel  Hannaforcl  &  Sons,  Architects. 


KITCHEN  BUILDING-THE  NEW  GENERAL  HOSPITAL,  CINCINNATI,  OHIO. 
Samuel  Hannaford  &  Sons,  Architects. 


462 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


KITCHEN-THE  NEW  GENERAL  HOSPITAL,  CINCINNATI,  OHIO. 
Samuel  Hannaford  &  Sons,  Architects. 


:ONTAGIOUS  DISEASES  GROUP-THE  NEW  GENERAL  HOSPITAL.  CINCINNATI,  OHIO. 
Samuel  Hannaford  &  Sons,  Architects. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


463 


boilers  of  260  horsepower  capacity  each. 
The  engine  room  is  in  another  building 
adjoining.  The  equipment  of  this  room 
consists  of  three  units  of  high-speed  en- 
gines, directly  connected  with  250  K.  W. 
generators.  In  this  room  are  also  the 
switchboard,  the  air  compressor,  and  the 
refrigerating  machinery.  Electric  cur- 
rent is  used  throughout  all  the  buildings 
for  light  and  power. 

In  the  second  story  of  the  power 
house  is  the  laundry.  One-half  is  for 
the  care  of  the  patients'  clothing,  while 
the  other  half  is  for  the  care  of  the 
clothing  of  the  employees  of  the  institu- 
tion. The  laundry  is  equipped  with  the 
best  of  laundry  machinery,  modern  in 
every  respect.  On  the  second  floor  of 
the  boiler  house  are  the  machine,  car- 
penter, and  paint  shops,  all  of  which  are 
properly  equipped  with  machinery  and 
supplies  to  care  for  the  repair  and  main- 
tenance of  the  buildings  and  equipment. 

The  research  building  lies  in  the  rear 
of  the  contagious  group  and  is  a  five- 
story  struct' re  housing  the  chapel,  re- 
search laboratories,  a  large  amphithea- 
ter where  students  go  for  instruction, 
operating  rooms  for  vivisection  pur- 
poses, etc.  This  work  will  be  of  the 
greatest  scientific  value  and  will  be  in 
charge  of  Dr.  Paul  G.  Woolley. 

Away  from  the  noise  of  traffic  on  the 
main  thoroughfares  is  the  nurses'  home. 
It  has  a  basement,  four  stories  and  a 
roof  garden.  It  is  connected  with  all 
the  other  buildings  in  the  group  by  the 
underground  tunnel.  Every  convenience 
has  been  added  to  make  the  home  a 
place  of  rest  for  tired  nurses.  On  the 
first  floor  are  a  library,  several  rooms 
for  educational  purposes,  reading  rooms, 


rest  rooms  and  a  laboratory  for  the  teach- 
ing of  special  work.  The  second,  third 
and  fourth  floors  have  sleeping  rooms 
for  the  nurses.  Each  room  has  its 
private  bath  and  toilet.  On  each  of 
these  floors  is  set  aside  a  little  tea  room 
and  kitchen  for  the  use  of  the  nurses  as 
they  see  fit  in  preparing  light  lunches 
for  themselves.  There  is  a  roof  garden 
with  a  large  inclosed  shelter  house  over 
the  central  portion.  Here  it  will  be  pos- 
sible for  the  nurses  to  take  recreation 
in  the  open  air  at  any  time.  Provision 
has  also  been  made  for  those  who  de- 
sire to  sleep  out  in  the  open  air. 

A  female  dormitory  is  located  in  the 
rear  of  the  nurses'  home.  All  female 
employees  of  the  institution  will  be 
housed  there,  excepting  the  nurses,  who 
are  taken  care  of  in  the  nurses'  home. 
The  main  features  of  the  nurses'  home 
apply  to  this  building,  but  it  does  not 
contain  a  separate  dining-room,  the  oc- 
cupants taking  their  meals  in  the  general 
dining-room  for  employees. 

The  equipment  of  this  new  hospital  is 
of  the  highest  possible  type.  No  other 
hospital  is  so  modern,  so  well  equipped 
in  every  detail.  World  renowned  physi- 
cians have  helped  to  make  it  the  best 
possible  hospital.  The  city  of  Cincin- 
nati owes  the  success  of  this  institution 
to  Dr.  C.  R.  Holmes,  who  spent  years 
in  the  study  of  hospitals  everywhere  be- 
fore imparting  the  information  gathered 
to  Samuel  Hannaford  &  Sons,  of  Cin- 
cinnati, the  architects  of  the  institution. 

The  entire  project  of  building  this 
new  hospital  was  placed  with  the  hos- 
pital commission,  consisting  of  Dr.  C. 
R.  Holmes,  Mr.  Harry  L.  Laws,  Dr.  J 
M.  Withrow  and  Mr.  Louis  S.  Levi. 


GARDENS— RESIDENCE  OF  C.  F. 
PERRY,  ESQ.,  HOLLYWOOD.  CAL. 
B.  COOPER  CORBETT,  ARCHITECT. 


CVR.R.ENT    AR.CHITE  CTVB.E 


DETAIL— RESIDENCE  OF  MRS.  LOUISE 

A.  DENKER,   LOS  ANGELES,  CAL. 

B.  COOPER  CORBETT,  ARCHITECT. 


466 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


RESIDENCE  OF  CHARLES  SHARP,  ESQ.,  LOS  ANGELES,  CAL. 
B.  Cooper  Corbett,  Architect. 


RESIDENCE  OF  C.  F.  PERRY,  ESQ.,  HOLLYWOOD,  CAL. 
B.  Cooper  Corbett,  Architect. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


467 


RESIDENCE  OF  MRS.  LOUISE  A.  DENKER,  LOS  ANGELES,  CAL. 
B.  Cooper  C'orbett,  Architect. 


RESIDENCE  OF  C.  WESLEY  ROBERTS,  ESQ.,  LOS  ANGELES,  CAL. 
B.  Cooper  Corbett,  Architect. 


468 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


*         * 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


4H9 


. 

Q  ^r 
o  ** 


C/2  >H  O 

a  J  u 

£H  hJ  4> 

I  O  §• 

2  a  8 

<  o 

-j 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


471 


<« 
P4   "' 

Si 
<2 


u  « 
w  !rt 

O  £ 


PQ  .•= 
<  B 


t 

U    u 


8* 


472 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


BUILDING  OF  BURKE  &  JAMES,  CHICAGO. 
Hill  &  Woltersdorf,  Architects. 


BUILDING  OF  THE  MEYER-BOTH  COMPANY,  CHICAGO. 
Hill  &  Woltersdorf,  Architects. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


473 


ABORATORY  OF  THUS.  J.  DEE  &  CO.,  CHICAGO. 
Hill  &  Woltersdorf,  Architects. 


ONTARIO  STREET  ANNEX-TREE  STUDIOS,  CHICAGO. 
Hill  &  Woltersdorf,  Architects. 


*,'••  iK-  .,/:•'>  i--  .^  -_.,^       ,  y- .=•-•;•:    -    «  -..-•  -.•    ..^•j-   -,-  .  *•>.••-,• ..-'  -•     *.<Vfca* 

ARCHITECT'S 


fj^--  •  •-•  •     • 


BOOKS  ON  MEDIEVAL  ARCHITECTURE 

By  RICHARD  FRANZ  BACH 

Curator,  School  of  Architecture,  Columbia  University 
PART  I. 


AT  a  time  when  the  uncertainty  of 
international  conflict  hovers  over 
many  a  medieval  building,  an  addi- 
tional stimulus  enlivens  our  interest  in 
the  great  formative  period  that  preceded 
the  Renaissance.  The  writers,  respond- 
ing faithfully  to  the  demand,  have  pro- 
duced a  number  of  new  works  and  new 
translations  and  editions  of  recognized 
works  of  standard  value,  which  should 
aid  in  no  small  degree  in  rendering  in- 
telligible the  architectural  significance  of 
the  stupendous  struggle  that  has  already 
so  extensively  laid  its  toll  upon  the  ves- 
tiges of  a  splendid  past  in  Europe. 

Of  great  interest,  though  slightly  be- 
yond the  present  troubled  area,  is  the 
volume  by  Henry  Adams  entitled  Mont- 
Saint-Michel  and  Chartrcs  (Houghton, 
Mifflin  Company,  Boston  and  New  York, 
quarto,  pp.  xiv-401,  ill.,  $6).  Ralph 
Adams  Cram,  arch-apostle  of  things 
Gothic  in  this  country,  writes  a  brief  in- 
troduction for  the  work  ;  not  to  introduce 
it  necessarily,  but  in  reality  to  make  pub- 
lic apology  to  the  author  because  his 
notably  meritorious  volume — so  long  hid- 
den from  students  as  a  private  publica- 
tion— has  only  now  been  given  to  the 


world.  Mr.  Cram  calls  this  "one  of  the 
most  distinguished  contributions  to  lit- 
erature and  one  of  the  most  valuable  ad- 
juncts to  the  study  of  medievalism 
America  thus  far  has  produced."  Nor 
has  he  grossly  exaggerated  the  worth  of 
Mr.  Adams'  book.  It  is  a  readable  and 
flowing  series  of  chapters  covering  not 
only  Mont  Saint  Michel,  a  pioneer  in 
six-part  vaulting,  and  the  cathedral  of 
Chartres,  a  pioneer  in  the  use  of  the 
oblong  vaulting  bay,  but  also  Coutances 
cathedral  and  the  "Abbaye  aux  Dames," 
Queen  Matilda's  church  at  Caen.  It  fol- 
lows into  many  channels  the  develop- 
ments of  stained  glass  and  of  apsidal 
plans,  of  towers  and  of  portals,  not  to 
mention  the  fine  chapters  on  Abelard, 
the  Miracles  of  Notre  Dame,  the  story  of 
Nicolette  and  Marion,  and  on  the  three 
important  queens  of  the  Gothic  period  in 
France,  Eleanor,  Mary  and  Blanche.  In 
these  chapters  Mr.  Adams'  ability  is  at 
the  full,  although  the  genteel  manner  of 
the  causerie  runs  through  the  whole  vol- 
ume without  at  any  point  lacking  the 
foundation  of  facts  and  of  architectural 
understanding.  We  should  wish  for  other 
volumes  equally  flowing  in  their  treat- 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


475 


ment;  the  monuments  of  the  Middle 
Ages,  splendidly  set  in  a  unified  life  and 
reflecting  it  in  a  thousand  brilliant  facets, 
lend  themselves  readily  to  the  graceful 
and  subtly  informing  style  of  which  the 
author  well  understands  the  beauties. 
Our  technical  historical  discussions  are 
many  and  accurate,  too  many  of  our 
pages  bristle  with  argument  on  the  fine 
points  of  attribution  and  of  origin,  but 
they  are  on  our  shelves  until  needed ; 
they  rarely  appear  on  our  library  tables, 
and  we  do  not  often  open  their  covers 
unless  searching  for  information  immedi- 
ately required.  This  volume  on  Mont 
Saint  Michel,  on  the  other  hand,  is  both 
technical  and  attractively  written ;  its 
place  is  assuredly  within  the  reach  of  the 
architect  who  is  always  "too  busy  to 
read,"  chiefly  because  too  many  books 
are  written  with  undisguised  purpose 
"at"  instead  of  "for"  the  architect.  An 
added  recommendation  of  the  work  is 
its  publication  by  authority  of  the  Amer- 
ican Institute  of  Architects,  of  which 
body  Mr.  Adams  has  recently  been  made 
an  honorary  member  "as  one  who  has 
rendered  distinguished  services"  to  archi- 
tecture. 

A  book  of  entirely  different  character, 
though  attempting  a  similar  vein,  is  that 
on  Cathedrals  and  Cloisters  of  Northern 
France,  by  Elise  Whitlock  Rose,  with  il- 
lustrations from  original  photographs  by 
Vida  Hunt  Francis.  (G.  P.  Putnam's 
Sons,  New  York ;  two  'volumes,  octavo, 
pp.  xvii-297  and  pp.  x-345,  ill.,  $5.) 
This  forms  the  concluding  part  of  a  se- 
ries of  four  two-volume  works  on  the 
cathedrals  and  cloisters  of  France,  others 
having  covered  Midland  France,  South 
of  France  and  the  Isle  of  France.  All 
the  volumes  are  profusely  illustrated 
with  fresh  material — there  are  no  less 
than  two  hundred  and  fifty  views  in  the 
present  set — and  for  this  reason  especial- 
ly useful  for  the  architect  and  present 
day  traveler;  while  the  text  is  the  com- 
pound result  of  much  research  and  ex- 
tensive personal  contact  with  the  build- 
ings, which  have  bred  an  appreciative  un- 
derstanding of  medieval  architecture 
and  clerical  life,  fitly  conveyed  in  a  brisk, 
somewhat  business-like  style.  This  man- 
ner of  writing  cannot,  of  course,  be  con- 


sidered a  detriment;  rather,  for  a  work 
of  this  kind,  a  decided  benefit.  The  area 
covered  by  the  volumes  in  hand  demands 
so  many  illustrations  that  the  text  can  be 
but  a  running  comment  at  best,  if  the 
whole  story  shall  be  told ;  yet  Miss  Rose 
has  been  particularly  successful  in  avoid- 
ing the  guide-book  descriptive  manner. 
Long  chapters  are  assigned  respectively 
to  Alsace-Lorraine,  Champagne,  The 
Nivernai-s,  Maine,  Anjou  and  Laval ;  of 
these  the  first  and  second  are  notably  well 
written.  Miss  Francis'  photographs  are 
of  exceptional  quality  and  the  point  of 
view  is  essentially  that  of  a  trained  me- 
dievalist. In  fact,  the  authors  seem  to 
have  struck  the  happy  mean  of  give  and 
take  which  makes  enjoyable  the  other- 
wise diplomatic  task  of  collaboration. 
The  present  book,  like  the  other  pairs 
of  volumes  preceding  it  in  the  series,  is 
well  bound  in  attractive  covers ;  the  type 
is  large;  in  general  the  work  will  stand 
a  credit  to  both  authors  and  publishers 
as  a  reliable  reference  book  on  the  dio- 
cesan buildings  of  northern  France. 

By  far  the  best  of  the  recent  works 
on  medieval  art  in  France  is  the  large 
volume  entitled  Religious  Art  in  France; 
Thirteenth  Century;  a  Study  of  Medie- 
val Iconography  and  Its  Sources  of  In- 
spiration, by  Emile  Male,  translated  from 
the  third  edition,  revised  and  enlarged, 
by  Dora  Nussey.  (E.  P.  Button  and 
Company,  New  York ;  quarto,  pp.  xxiv- 
415,  ill.,  $6.)  This  is  a  masterly  treatise 
with  a  broad  foundation  in  symbolism 
and  the  didactic  quality  of  Gothic  art. 
dealing  with  medieval  Christianity  as  a 
fluid,  mobile  and  living  thing,  and  prop- 
erly collating  the  art  with  life,  thought 
and  theology  to  form  a  splendid  Chris- 
tian unity. 

M.  Male's  first  words  are :  "The  Mid- 
dle Ages  had  a  passion  for  order."  A 
thorough  medievalist,  his  book  partakes 
of  the  orderliness  he  lauds.  He  begins 
with  an  analytical  chapter  entitled  "Gen- 
eral Characteristics  of  Medieval  Iconog- 
raphy," in  which  he  sets  forth  that  me- 
dieval art  is  characterized  notably  as  a 
script  or  sacred  writing,  as  a  calculus  or 
sacred  mathematics,  and  as  a  symbolic 
code.  We  have  been  prone  to  grant  too 
little  importance  to  the  symbolic  qualitv 


476 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


of  Gothic  art;  a  true  understanding  of 
this  would  long  since  have  indicated  the 
single  thread  of  harmony  that  runs 
through  all  things  medieval.  The  unify- 
ing current  of  symbolism  permeated  the 
life  of  the  thirteenth  century  as  thor- 
oughly in  France,  as  our  so-called  "busi- 
ness instinct"  dominates  the  life  of  the 
twentieth  century  in  this  country. 

But  it  will  require  more  than  a  sim- 
ple appreciation  of  the  symbolic  element 
in  medieval  ornament  fully  to  convey  the 
fact  that  the  designers  of  the  time  "or- 
ganized art  as  they  organized  dogma. 
The  artistic  representation  of  sacred  sub- 
jects was  a  science  governed  by  fixed 
laws  which  could  not  be  broken  by  the 
dictates  of  individual  imagination." 

In  the  first  place,  the  art  of  the  Mid- 
dle Ages  developed — as  must  any  art 
when  general  education  is  at  a  low  ebb — 
a  kind  of  hieratic  language  which  indi- 
cated to  the  plcbs  Dei  all  that  it  needed  to 
know  of  the  religion  which  was  life. 
This  sacred  script  acquired  a  great  com- 
plexity but  never  lost  a  rigid  regularity 
and  sameness  of  meaning,  however  the 
individual  forms  may  have  been  em- 
ployed or  manipulated.  The  result  was 
an  ecclesiastic  grammar,  in  which  the 
relation  of  parts  was  utterly  organic  and 
therefore  always  intelligible  when  prop- 
erly used.  Misuse  of  symbols  was  tanta- 
mount to  heresy.  Each  artist  had,  there- 
fore, to  learn  an  ecclesiastic  alphabet  of 
forms,  for  by  the  very  forms  did  his 
record  take  shape.  There  is  no  need  in 
such  didactic  forms  for  great  depth  or 
beauty  in  the  abstract  or  aesthetic  under- 
standing on  which  we  pride  ourselves  and 
which  inflicts  upon  art  an  aloofness 
which  it  never  properly  possessed  nor 
desired  to  convey.  We  spend  much  time 
seeking  modern  beauties  in  medieval  art, 
projecting  temperamental  or  sentimental 
significance  into  motives  which  speak  an 
obvious  language  that  escapes  us  because 
if  is  so  direct  and  plain  spoken.  Yet  the 
emotional  was  not  eliminated ;  that  could 
not  be  the  case  at  such  a  time  of  fervid, 
often  ascetic,  Christianity. 

But  apart  from  the  symbolism  of  use 
which  dictated  bare  feet  here  and  aureole 
there,  we  must  give  importance  also  to 
position,  grouping,  symmetry  and  num- 


ber in  medieval  iconography ;  for  by  vir- 
tue of  its  observance  of  these  qualities 
the  emblematic  story  of  the  Middle  Ages 
developed  a  sort  of  sacred  mathematics, 
subject  to  formulae  scientifically  as  rig- 
orous. In  this  connection  must  be  noted 
the  orientation  of  buildings,  the  relative 
positions  of  symbols,  the  comparative 
significance  of  different  parts  of 
churches,  the  interrelation  of  figures  in 
religious  history  being  closely  paralleled 
in  their  carved,  painted  or  stained  glass 
counterparts.  Thus  the  more  gloomy 
northern  transept  arm,  for  instance,  was 
decorated  with  motives  from  the  Old 
Testament,  the  warmer  southern  transept 
with  those  chosen  from  the  New  Testa- 
ment. The  symmetry  which  signified  in- 
ner harmony  appears  in  the  balancing  of 
the  twelve  ancient  patriarchs  or  the 
twelve  prophets  against  the  twelve  Apos- 
tles of  Christ ;  and  in  the  same  fashion 
other  groups  were  disposed  according  to 
a  sort  of  biblical  equation.  The  Virtues 
and  Liberal  Arts,  in  equal  numbers,  are 
similarly  balanced,  e.  g.,  in  opposite  win- 
dows or  in  opposite  or  parallel  recessed 
doorways.  The  meaning  of  numbers  in 
this  connection  may  be  better  understood 
by  an  actual  passage  from  M.  Male  re- 
ferring, by  way  of  example,  to  the  ritu- 
alistic interpretations  of  the  numbers 
twelve  and  seven  :  "Twelve  is  the  number 
of  the  universal  Church,  and  it  was  for 
profound  reasons  that  Jesus  willed  the 
number  of  His  apostles  should  be  twelve. 
Now  twelve  is  the  product  of  three  by 
four.  Three,  which  is  the  number  of  the 
Trinity  and  by  consequence  of  the  soul 
made  in  the  image  of  the  Trinity,  con- 
notes all  spiritual  things.  Four,  the  num- 
ber of  the  elements,  is  the  symbol  of  ma- 
terial things — the  body  and  the  world — 
which  result  from  combinations  of  the 
four  elements.  To  multiply  three  by  four 
is  in  the  mystic  sense  to  infuse  matter 
with  spirit,  to  proclaim  the  truths  of  the 
faith  to  the  world,  to  establish  the  uni- 
versal Church  of  which  the  apostles  are 
the  symbol."  The  computation  involv- 
ing the  number  seven  is  yet  more  ingeni- 
ous; it  reaches  a  real  grandeur.  "The 
number  seven,  regarded  by  the  Fathers 
as  mysterious  above  all  others,  intoxi- 
cated the  medieval  mystic.  It  was  ob- 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


477 


served  first  of  all  that  seven — composed 
of  four,  the  number  of  the  body,  and  of 
three,  the  number  of  the  soul — is  pre- 
eminently the  number  of  humanity,  and 
expresses  the  union  of  man's  double  na- 
ture. All  that  relates  to  him  is  ordered 
in  series  of  sevens.  Human  life  is  di- 
vided into  seven  ages  with  each  of  which 
is  associated  the  practice  of  one  of  the 
seven  virtues.  The  grace  necessary  for 
the  practice  of  these  seven  virtues  is 
gained  by  addressing  to  God  the  seven 
petitions  of  the  Paternoster.  The  seven 
sacraments  sustain  man  in  the  exercise 
of  the  seven  virtues,  and  guard  him  from 
falling  into  the  seven  deadly  sins.  The 
number  seven  thus  expresses  the  har- 
mony of  man's  nature,  but  it  also  ex- 
presses the  harmonious  relation  of  man 
to  the  universe.  The  seven  planets  gov- 
ern human  destiny,  for  each  of  the  seven 
ages  is  under  the  influence  of  one  of 
them."  On  this  point  witness  the  carv- 
ings of  the  seven  ages  of  man  on  the 
capitals  of  the  Doge's  Palace  at  Ven- 
ice and  the  frescoes  of  the  Chapel  of 
the  Eremitani  at  Padua ;  the  tradition  is 
undoubtedly  to  be  led  back  to  classical 
times.  "Thus  seven  invisible  threads 
connect  man  with  the  scheme  of  the  uni- 
verse. Now  the  beautiful  symphony 
made  by  man  and  the  world  will  last  for 
seven  periods  of  time  .  .  of  which 
six  have  already  passed.  By  creating  the 
world  in  seven  days  God  gave  man  the 
key  to  these  mysteries,  and  the  Church 
celebrates  the  sublimity  of  the  Creator's 
plan  when  she  sings  His  praises  seven 
times  a  day." 

Finally  we  have  the  manifestation  of 
medieval  art  as  a  symbolic  code,  on  the 
basis  of  which  definite  ideas  are  given 
a  figurative  expression,  and  therewith  a 
quickening  spirit.  It  is  an  art  of  inten- 
tions, as  well  as  of  actualities.  Thus  the 
four  rivers  of  Paradise  are  not  only  what 
they  seem  pictorially,  but  represent  also 
the  four  Evangelists  pouring  their  benefi- 
cent doctrine  in  a  flood  over  the  world. 
The  liturgy  itself  contains  a  myriad  of 
hidden  meanings,  and  each  stage  of  the 
mass  is  a  step  in  the  unfolding  of  the 
great  story  of  life,  death  and  salvation. 
Thus  the  long  neglected  works  of  the 
medieval  liturgiologists  must  be  exalted 


to  a  new  dignity,  equal  to  that  accorded 
to  splendid  figures  like  Hugh  of  St. 
Victor,  Rhabanus  Maurus,  Gulielmus 
Durandus,  Thomas  Aquinas  and  Vincent 
of  Beauvais  himself.  In  the  same  fash- 
ion we  might  follow  this  figurative 
expression  in  its  multiple  applications 
in  clerical  vestments.,  in  illuminated 
manuscripts  or  in  portable  church 
utensils.  Nor  is  it  fair  to  consider  the 
extent  and  intricacy  of  this  symbolic 
system  the  result  of  a  play  of  fancy, 
devising  by  devious  means  far  fetched 
connotations  or  befuddling  numerical 
puzzles.  The  fervor  of  the  medieval 
Christian  is  not  to  be  denied,  and  what- 
ever his  failings  as  zealot  and  devotee, 
he  was  a  good  churchman,  the  sole  teach- 
er of  the  people,  and  in  that  sense  at  least 
thoroughly  religious.  In  his  ecclesiastic 
art  we  can  therefore  expect  a  sincerity 
and  uniformity  of  purpose  and  in  his  all 
embracing  symbolism  an  amplification  of 
the  only  ready  means  of  access  to  the 
minds  of  the  masses  for  the  truth  they 
so  much  needed. 

The  main  body  of  M.  Male's  book 
carries  out  the  threefold  interpretation 
promised  in  the  introduction,  and  the  au- 
thor arranges  his  task  in  accordance  with 
the  subdivision  laid  down  by  Vincent  of 
Beauvais,  the  Ubrorum  helluo  or  devour- 
er  of  books,  the  most  comprehensive 
thinker  of  the  Middle  Ages,  in  his  Mir- 
ror. This  was  one  of  a  large  number 
of  works,  called  variously  speculum, 
summa,  or  imago  mundi,  in  the  encyclo- 
pedic thirteenth  century.  Believing  thor- 
oughly in  the  fitness  of  things,  M.  Male 
has  chosen  the  Speculum  Majus  of  Vin- 
cent of  Beauvais  as  a  model,  for,  says 
he,  we  may  not  without  danger  of  error 
project  our  modern  categories  into  the 
work  of  the  Middjes  Ages  and  expect 
the  latter  to  order  itself  according  to 
an  alien  mode  of  classification  and 
thought.  Vincent  adopts  "the  very  plan 
of  God  as  it  appears  in  the  Scriptures" 
and  divides  his  stupendous  work  into 
four  major  parts,  each  called  a  Mirror, 
as  follows :  the  Mirror  of  Nature,  the 
Mirror  of  Instruction,  the  Mirror  of 
Morals,  and  the  Mirror  of  History.  The 
four  Mirrors  are  logically  connected, 
more  or  less  as  a  cumulative  develop- 


478 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


ment.  We  begin  with  Nature  and  the 
truth  of  Creation,  culminating  in  the 
sixth  day's  achievement  and  the  appear- 
ance of  man  upon  earth.  The  Mirror  of 
Instruction  recites  the  eternal  question  or 
"riddle  of  the  universe;"  it  treats  of  the 
fall  of  man,  and  his  endeavor  to  rise 
again — through  knowledge  which  gives 
power — by  beginning  the  work  of  his  re- 
demption with  the  labor  of  his  hands 
in  the  mechanical  arts.  Since  the  end  of 
life  is  not  only  "to  know  but  to  act," 
since  knowledge  is  the  key  to  virtue,  we 
are  led  naturally  to  the  Mirror  of  Mor- 
als, wherein  the  virtues  and  vices  are 
carefully  classified.  Having  thus  ana- 
lyzed and  laid  bare  the  substance  of  man, 
it  behooves  us  to  note  his  ability  in  shift- 
ing for  himself,  in  unwinding  the  course 
of  his  life  under  the  unseen  guidance  of 
God;  this  is  the  Mirror  of  History.  To 
Vincent,  the  Churchman,  the  only  true 
history  is  of  course  the  history  of  the 
universal  or  Catholic  Church.  Pagan  life 
has  a  mere  synchronic  value,  incidental 
to  the  brilliant  course  of  Catholicism 
with  its  eminently  coherent  sequence  of 
Old  and  New  Testament  saints. 

In  this  quartet  of  Mirrors  Vincent  of 
Beauvais  gathered  together  the  sum  and 
substance  of  the  Middle  Ages,  an  eternal 
pandect  or  synopsis.  No  less  funda- 
mental a  transformation  than  the  Renais- 
sance itself  was  necessary  to  add  to  its 
information.  It  portrays  vividly  the  lead- 
ing conceptions  that  inspired  thirteenth 
century  art ;  "the  same  genius  disposed 
the  chapters  of  the  Mirror  and  the  sculp- 
ture of  the  Cathedral.  It  is  legitimate 
to  seek  in  one  the  meaning  of  the  other." 

M.  Male's  system  then  is  that  of  Vin- 
cent of  Beauvais  throughout,  and  his 
thoroughness  not  a  jot  less.  He  runs  the 
gamut  of  sculpture  and  stained  glass,  of 
capitals  and  corbels,  of  floral  motives  and 
monsters,  of  lunettes  and  lintel  bands  of 
painted  walls,  pinnacle  and  carved  por- 
tals. He  cites  chapter  and  verse  for 
every  assertion  with  a  methodical  direct- 
ness that  is  little  short  of  perfect  in  its 


command  of  literary  as  well  as  monu- 
mental sources.  The  porches  of  Chartres 
live  again  and  we  find  its  figures  moving 
to  a  sort  of  churchly  music  of  the  spheres 
which  permeates  the  Middle  Ages  and 
imparts  to  them  a  oneness  that  brooked 
but  few  exceptions.  We  travel  from 
Laon  to  Amiens,  from  Bourges  to 
Poitiers,  and  the  truths  are  always  the 
same ;  solid  homogeneity  and  order  de- 
mand that  the  same  story  be  taught  in 
the  same  way  throughout  Christendom. 

M.  Male  is  a  medievalist  second  to 
none,  and  his  sincerity  strikes  a  quick 
note  of  accord  in  the  reader.  But  he 
is  not  a  preacher  for  the  modern.  That 
is  not  his  chosen  province ;  he  simply 
takes  the  fine  Gothic  time  when  the  flow- 
er is  full  blown. and  unfolds  its  hidden 
beauties  to  eyes  that  had  thought  to  see 
all  its  truths,  but  that  soon  appreciate 
the  shallowness  of  usual  study  and  be- 
gin to  sound  a  new  depth.  He  does  not 
point  Gothic  lessons  for  the  present ;  nor 
does  he  advocate  the  resurrection  of  an 
artistic  mode  of  speech  hopelessly  be- 
yond reach.  He  attempts  only  to  indicate 
the  manly  conviction  and  ingrained  faith 
which  dominated  one  of  the  golden  ages 
of  art. 

The  book  is  somewhat  heavy,  but  the 
number  of  illustrations — there  are  one 
hundred  and  ninety — is  largely  responsi- 
ble for  that.  The  "make-up"  of  the  vol- 
ume deserves  particular  mention.  The 
many  necessary  references  are  gathered 
in  easily  legible  footnotes,  so  that  fre- 
quent place  names  may  not  clutter  the 
text.  There  is  an  appendix  giving  a  list 
of  the  chief  works  devoted  to  the  life 
of  Christ,  appearing  in  the  churches  of 
the  end  of  the  twelfth,  the  thirteenth  and 
the  fourteenth  centuries.  Finally  there 
is  also  an  exhaustive  bibliography,  an 
index  of  works  of  art  classified  by  char- 
acter or  subject,  location  and  building. 
We  are  glad  to  congratulate  both  M. 
Male  and  the  E.  P.  Button  Company 
upon  an  authoritative  publication,  thor- 
oughly successful  in  every  particular. 


NOTES 

AND 
COMMENTS 


A  Seashore 
Cottage  at 
Nantucket. 


Small    country    houses 
are   so   seldom   designed 
by  architects  of  any  real 
ability     that     every     in- 
stance   of    a    good    and 
original    design    in    this 
field       deserves       notice. 
The  little  house  at  Nan- 
tucket,    herewith    illustrated,    is    one   of   the 
most  attractive  that  has   recently   come  to 
our  attention.     It  is  the  property  of  Miss 
Alice   M.    Corse,   and   was   planned   by   her 
brother,   Mr.   Henry  T.   Corse,  Jr.,  of  New 
York. 

The  house  faces 
directly  on  the 
ocean,  with  its  back 
to  the  road.  The 
entrance,  from  the 
rear,  leads  to  a 
small  stair  hall,  and 
thence  to  the  main 
living-room,  with  an 
alcove  giving  direct- 
ly on  the  beach.  Ad- 
jacent is  a  porch  of 
comfortable  size, 
and  back  of  this  the 
dining-room.  The 
service  is  located  in 
the  wing  toward  the 
road,  on  the  right  of 
the  entrance.  Up- 
stairs are  four  mas- 
t  e  r  s  '  bed-rooms, 
maid's  room  and 
bath. 

In    a    construction 


HOUSE    OF   MISS   ALICE    M.    CORSE. 

NANTUCKET,  MASS. 
Henry  T.  Corse,  Jr.,  Architect. 


of  this  size,  elaborate  architecture  would 
be  out  of  place,  and  Mr.  Corse,  very 
properly,  has  treated  the  building  with 
the  greatest  possible  simplicity.  The 
entire  house  is  shingled;  the  porch  col- 
umns are  simple,  square  wooden  posts; 


the     chimneys     are     of     the     plainest     de- 
scription.    Interest   is    given,    however,    by 
the  effective  grouping  of  the  windows  and 
their  subdivision,  and  by  the  unusual  lines 
of  the  roof.    On  the  main  front  the  roof  has 
been  carried  down  in  a  long  slope  over  the 
porch,  with  the  three  domes  to  add  variety 
to   its   surface,   while   the   hip   on   the    sides 
is  cut  off  so  as  to  give  a  vertical  wall  up 
to   the  tops   of   the   second   story  windows. 
On  the  rear  the  same  scheme  is  logically 
carried  out,  the  symmetry  of  the  sides  de- 
termining the  treatment  of  each  portion  of 
the  roof.     The  only  questionable  feature  is 
the    gable    over    the 
stairs,    as    it    seems 
that    a    hip    roof    at 
this     point      might 
have  composed  more 
harmoniously      with 
the  general  arrange- 
ment.     But   the    de- 
sign  as    it   exists   is 
good   enough   to   be 
cause     for     self-con- 
gratulation   both    to 
the  architect  and  to 
the  casual  visitor. 

In  view  of  its  un- 
doubted architectur- 
al merit,  the  low 
cost  of  this  house  is 
quite  remarkable. 
Those  who  con- 
sider  an  archi- 
tect as  an  ex- 
pensive and  un- 
necessary luxury 
knowing  that  the 


may    be    interested    in 

total  cost,  including  the  land,  was  less  than 
five  thousand  dollars.  Even  the  omission 
of  a  cellar,  according  to  the  local  custom, 
makes  this  economy  none  the  less  note- 
worthy. 


480 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


The  Continental  Amer- 
ican  Bank,   the  latest  of 
A   Bank,  the  great  buildings  erected 

Monumental       in  Chicago  by  the  office  of 
and  the  late  Daniel  H.  Burn- 

Beautiful,  ham,  is  a  tremendous  pro- 

duction. It  occupies  an 
entire  block,  approxi- 
mately 600  feet  in  length  by  200  feet  in 
width,  and  it  is  twenty-five  stories  in  height. 
The  exterior  is  massive  in  scale  and  simple 
in  composition.  The  detail  is  not  of  special 
interest  aside  from  the  great  colonnade 
of  red  granite  columns 
which  extends  the  entire 
length  of  the  basement 
and  first  story  on  the 
principal  front.  Above 
the  basement  and  first 
story  the  building  is 
built  in  a  hollow  square 
which  permits  of  the 
first  story  being  lighted 
by  a  vast  skylight,  many 
thousands  of  square  feet 
in  area.  It  is  this  first 
story  which  is  the  most 
interesting  and  success- 
ful feature  of  the  great 
building.  It  is  occupied 
by  the  important  bank- 
ing institution  which 
gives  the  building  its 
name.  The  dimensions 
of  this  first  story  are  so 
tremendous  and  the  scale 
which  has  been  employed 
in  its  architectural  treat- 
ment so  immense  that 
although  the  height  of 
the  basement  is  sufficient 
to  afford  a  story  of  suf- 
ficient height  to  provide 
quarters  for  another 
great  bank,  the  stairs 
which  lead  at  each  end 
of  the  block  from  the  en- 
trance and  elevator  lobby 
to  the  main  banking  floor 


A  Layman 

on 
Builders 

and 
Planning. 


HOUSE   OF    MISS   ALICE    M.    CORSE. 

NANTUCKET,  MASS. 
Henry  T.  Corse,  Jr.,  Architect. 


seem  absolutely  inconsiderable  and  give  one 
the  feeling  of  being  not  more  than  three  or 
four  risers  in  height.  The  floor  of  the  bank- 
ing room  itself  is  that  of  a  great  Grecian 
temple,  with  triple  rows  of  columns  down 
each  side.  The  bank  screens  have  all  been 
placed  behind  the  second  row  of  columns 
and  their  material  and  detail  as  well  as 
that  of  all  the  other  features  of  the  room 
have  been  kept  low  in  tone  and  are  beauti- 
ful and  well  studied  in  detail. 


This  many  a  day  we 
have  waited  for  the 
small  but  effective  voice 
out  of  the  wilderness 
that  would  indicate  the 
opinion  of  the  world  as 
to  the  case  of  architect 
versus  builder.  To  most 
of  us'  the  idea  of  competition  between  these 
gentlemen  is  ridiculous,  yet  the  stern  real- 
ity is  forced  upon  us  as  soon  as  we  leave 
the  cities  and  observe  the  activity  of  build- 
ers in  communities  smaller.  In  such  impor- 
tant matters  we  some- 
times hear  the  keynote 
struck  in  the  enemy's 
camp,  as  it  were,  and  for 
that  reason  we  are  not 
greatly  surprised  to 
come  upon  the  follow- 
ing, which  is  an  excerpt 
from  the  letter  of  a  cor- 
respondent of  the  Chris- 
tian World:  "The  worst 
is  that  there  are  duffers 
in  the  architectural  pro- 
fession. An  architect 
wants  choosing.  But  the 
right  kind  of  architect  is 
a  man  who  is  very  sel- 
dom overpaid  for  his 
work."  What  truths  are 
these!  The  duffers  we 
are  anxious  to  ostracise 
after  the  manner  of  the 
ancient  Greeks,  for  it  is 
they  who  render  the 
choosing  necessary.  But, 
architecturally,  the  word 
overpaid  does  not  exist. 
"He  .  .  .  ensures 
that  .  .  ..  the  builder 
does  precisely  what  he 
has  engaged  to  do  .  .  . 
and  ...  as  a  usual 
thing  the  architect  is 
able  to  produce,  in  co- 
operation with  the  build- 
er, a  much  more  attrac- 
the  builder  would  have 
After  all. 


tive  house  than 
produced  on  his  own  account, 
the  work  of  the  builder  is  building,  no: 
planning."  And  this  last  sentence  the  edi- 
torial writer  of  The  Builder  calls  the  Kim- 
berly  diamond  found  in  the  blue  clay,  and 
he  adds  with  relish:  ".  .  .  When  the  aver- 
age man  discovers  that  the  work  of  the 
builder  is  building,  not  planning,  the  archi- 
tects may  make  a  joyful  sound  and  put 
crowns  upon  their  heads." 


i  tv^  i    •    i 

ORCHID 
2ECOI8 


PVBLl/HEDjNNEV 


TRAND" 


No  Bolts 


No  Screws 


No  Rivets 


Steel  Doors  and  Other 
Interior  Trim 

Are    built    under   a    Patented   Construction 
which  makes  them  more  durable  and  more 
efficient  than  any  others. 
They  contain  the  least  possible  number  of 
units,   and   every  joint   is 

WELDED  BY  ELECTRICITY 

That's  why  Zahner  products  were  selected 
for  the  M  on  ward  Realty  Co.'s  office  build- 
ing, St.  Louis  (Eames  &  Young,  Archts., 
James  Stewart  &  Co.,  Contractors). 
Write  for  estimates — samples  of  construction 
and  finish  information.  In  fact  any  desired. 


and  Door  Co. 


MBuraBi 


Successors 
to  The  Monarch 
Metal   Mfg.   Co. 

Agents  in  All 
Principal  Cities 


!!    nil' <">" 

IHII  n  n  n  n  n  H  Him 

n  n  n  n  n  n  n  n  n  n  n  ii 
ii  ii  11  n  n  n  n  ii  ir  riiio 
'"""""Pnnr  mi" 


VOL.  XXXVIL     No.  6 


JUNE,   1915 


SERIAL  NO.  201 


ARCHITECTVRAL 
v    RECORD 


COVER-ENTRANCE  TO  GLYNDE,  ENGLAND  Page 

By  G-  Matlack  Price 

THE  NEW  HOME  OF  JOHNS  HOPKINS  UNIVERSITY    *  *  .481 

By  John  Martin  Hammond 

ROMAN  ARCHITECTURE  AND  ITS  CRITICS.    Part  II  -  -      493 

By  Prof.  A.  D.  F.  Hamlin,  of  Columbia  University 

TWO  DENTAL  BUILDINGS  IN  PHILADELPHIA  AND  BOSTON  .      516 

By  Harold  D.  Eberlein 

CERTAIN  PHASES  OF  SPANISH  COLONIAL  ARCHITECTURE  -      535 

By  Marrion  Wilcox 

COLONIAL  ARCHITECTURE  IN  CONNECTICUT.    Part  III  .      547 

Text  and  Measured  Drawings  by  Wesley  Sherwood  Bessell 

PORTFOLIO  OF  CURRENT  ARCHITECTURE  •     -  -  -  -      557 

RECENT  BOOKS  ON  MEDIEVAL  ARCHITECTURE.    Part  II      k-  ,      563 

By  Richard  Franz  Bach 

NOTES  AND  COMMENTS     -  567 

INDEX  FOR  JANUARY  TO  JUNE    > 569 


Editor :  MICHAEL  A.  MIKKELSEN.  Contributing  Editor :   HERBERT  CROLY 

Advertising  Manager  :    AUSTIN  L.  BLACK 

Yearly  Subscription— United  States  $3.00  Entered  May  22.    1902.   as  Second  Copyright    1915  by  The   Architectural 

—Foreign  $4.00— Single  Copies   35  cents  Class    Matter,  at  New  York.    N.  Y.  Record  Company— All  Rights  Reserved 

PUBLISHED    MONTHLY    BY 

THE  ARCHITECTURAL  RECORD   COMPANY 


115-119  WEST  FORTIETH  STREET.  NEW  YORK 


F.  W.    DODGE,    President 


F.    T.    MILLER,    Secretary  and  Treasurer 


PORTICO  AND  CLOCK  TOWER— ACADEMIC  BUILD- 
ING, JOHNS  HOPKINS  UNIVERSITY,  BALTIMORE. 
PARKER,  THOMAS  &  RICE,  ARCHITECTS. 


AKC 


THE  . 

ITECTVKAL 


FIECOKD 


JVNE,  1915 


VOLVME  XXXVII 


NVMBER  VI 


NEW  HOME   OF 

JOHNS  HOPKINS 

VNIVER.SITY 

<3y  Jofjn  y/(artin  3fammorid~ 


THE  development  of  the  city  in  the 
neighborhood  of  the  present  build- 
ings of  the  Johns  Hopkins  Uni- 
versity and  the  growth  of  the  under- 
graduate department  rendered  necessary, 
a  decade  and  more  ago,  the  creation  of  a 
new  home  for  the  institution ;  and  the 
movement  which  resulted  from  a  recog- 
nition of  this  need  has  taken  definite 
shape  in  "Homewood,"  the  new  seat  of 
the  school.  The  beautiful  tract  of  wood- 
land which  was  selected  as  the  site  for 
the  university  has  been  surveyed  and 
graded,  and  five  of  the  units  of  the 
projected  university  group,  including 
Oilman  Hall,  the  principal  building,  have 
been  completed,  so  that  the  architects  and 
planners  of  the  establishment  are  fully 
committed  to  their  plans.  The  university 
expects  to  be  in  operation  at  Homewood 
in  the  fall  of  this  year.  It  is  safe  to  as- 
sert that  in  general  beauty  and  charm  the 
grounds  and  buildings  of  Homewood 


have  rarely  been  equalled  and  the  disposi- 
tion of  the  buildings  with  regard-to  each 
other  and  their  individual  arrangement 
present  features  of  novelty,  ingenuity  and 
practicality  of  construction  of  absorbing 
interest  to  architect  and  layman. 

Anyone  familiar  with  Baltimore,  or 
who  will  look  at  a  map  of  the  city,  will 
know  that  the  present  situation  of  Johns 
Hopkins  University  is  in  the  business 
center  of  the  city.  The  new  site  is  about 
two  miles  due  north  of  the  old,  within  the 
city  limits,  and  in  the  choicest  part  of  a 
section  toward  which  the  tide  of  fine  resi- 
dence building  of  the  city  has  of  late 
years  most  consistently  set.  It  consists 
of  one  hundred  and  fifty  acres  of  land, 
fifteen  of  which  is  held  back  temporarily 
from  the  university  as  a  life  trust  in  an 
estate,  and  was  presented  to  the  univer- 
sity largely  through  the  generosity  of  the 
late  William  Wvman,  a  public-spirited 
citizen  of  Baltimore.  The  tract  which 


482 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


he  donated  has  been  enlarged  by  various 
individuals,  notably  William  Keyser, 
Samuel  Keyser,  Francis  M.  Jencks,  Will- 
iam H.  Buckler  and  Julian  LeRoy  White, 
— names  long  associated  with  Hopkins 
development. 

It  is  a  beautiful  rolling  stretch  of  land 
containing  many  fine  forest  trees  and  the 
entire  western  and  southern  boundary 
has  been  developed  by  the  city,  with  an 
appreciation  of  the  coming  of  the  uni- 
versity, as  a  public  park  known  as  Wy- 
man  Park.  The  eastern  and  most  im- 
portant boundary  of  the  tract  is  Charles 
street,  Baltimore's  most  historic  thor- 
oughfare, and  the  northern  boundary  is 
the  "Boulevard,"  the  city's  newest  and 
most  elegant  suburban  artery.  Charles 


pointed,  consisting  of  Walter  Cook,  of 
New  York;  Frederic  Law  Olmsted,  of 
Boston,  and  J.  B.  Noel  Wyatt,  of  Balti- 
more, and  under  its  guidance  all  of  the 
initial  work  of  the  university  was  done. 
During  the  progress  of  the  preliminary 
planning  Messrs.  Wyatt  and  Cook  had 
become  executive  architects,  so,  in  1911, 
the  advisory  board  was  reorganized  to 
consist  of  Messrs.  Frank  Miles  Day,  of 
Philadelphia ;  Grosvenor  Atterbury,  of 
New  York,  and  Frederic  Law  Olmsted, 
of  Boston,  and  this  is  its  present  com- 
position. 

To  this  board  has  been  entrusted  the 
important  task  of  general  supervision 
and  of  preserving  harmony  in  the  build- 
ings through  the  course  of  the  years. 


GENERAL  VIEW  OF  HOMEWOOD,  THE  NEW  SEAT  OF  JOHNS  HOPKINS  UNIVERSITY. 

BALTIMORE. 


street,  also,  has  been  widened  and  parked 
and  on  this  street  at  the  entrance  to 
Homewood  has  been  placed  a  "circle." 
Roughly,  the  whole  tract  is  in  the  shape 
of  an  elongated  hexagon  of  approxi- 
mately equal  angles,  Charles  street  oc- 
cupying the  lengthened  eastern  side,  the 
"Boulevard"  the  adjacent  shorter  side  to 
the  north,  and  Wyman  Park  all  of  the 
rest  of  the  figure. 

'We  find,  then,  that  in  1902  the  uni- 
versity fathers  possessed  this  beautiful 
and  ideally  located  tract  of  land.  On  it 
was  standing  Homewood,  the  old  Car- 
roll homestead,  one  of  the  most  delight- 
ful of  Maryland's  survivals  of  the 
Georgian  period  of  building.  The  work 
of  development  commenced.  An  ad- 
visory board  of  architects  was  ap- 


Under  the  guidance  of  their  advisers 
the  university  authorities  in  1904  opened 
a  competition  to  five  well-known  firms  of 
architects,  and  the  plan  of-  development 
submitted  by  Messrs.  Parker  and  Thom- 
as, of  Baltimore — now  the  firm  of  Park- 
er, Thomas  and  Rice,  of  Baltimore  and 
Boston — was  approved  as  best  and  ac- 
cepted. This  plan  had  as  its  structural 
motif  the  design  of  Homewood,  the  old 
building  from  which  the  estate  took  its 
name ;  and  it  was  felt  that  not  only  was 
Georgian  architecture  peculiarly  ap- 
propriate to  the  site  of  the  university,  but 
lent  itself  extraordinarily  well  to  the  de- 
velopment of  a  university  group  of 
buildings. 

The  advantages  of  the  Georgian  for 
a  university  group,  as  conceived  by  the 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


483 


VIEW  FROM  HOPKINS  OVAL,  JOHNS  HOPKINS  UNIVERSITY,  HOMEWOOD,  BALTIMORE. 


university  authorities  and  advisory  arch- 
itects, may  be  summed  up  briefly  as  fol- 
lows: It  is  beautiful,  it  is  dignified  and 
restful;  it  lends  itself  well  to  combina- 
tion with  other  buildings  of  the  same 
character;  it  gives  square  rooms  and 
no  loss  of  floor  space;  it  provides  for 
ventilation  and  lighting ;  and,  last  of  all, 
it  is  cheap  and  durable  from  the  stand- 
point of  construction. 

The  proportions  and  decoration  of 
Homewood — the  building — were  careful- 
ly studied  and  preserved  as  far  as  pos- 
sible in  the  plans  of  the  new  buildings, 
the  proportion  of  window  space  to  floor 
space  only  being  changed  so  as  to  give 
ample  light.  The  windows  of  the  new 
buildings  of  Hopkins  bear  a  constant  re- 
lation to  the  floor  space  of  one  to  six. 
So  carefully  have  the  interesting  exterior 
features  of  Homewood — the  building — 
been  preserved  that  the  main  entrance 
of  Oilman  Hall,  the  principal  building 
of  the  group,  is  an  enlarged  version 
drawn  to  scale  of  the  portico  and  en- 
trance to  the  old  home.  So  much  for  the 
spirit  of  the  new  Johns  Hopkins  group. 

The  years  of  planning  were  not  with- 
out work  of  constructive  emphasis.  A 
careful  topographical  survey  of  the 
grounds  was  made  which  was  the  base 
of  a  map  of  a  scale  of  40  feet  to  an  inch. 


with  one  foot  contours,  in  which  the 
location  of  trees  was  closely  indicated. 
The  fine  old  woodlands  of  the  estate 
were  carefully  studied  by  F.  W.  Besley, 
State  Forester  of  Maryland,  and  many 
of  the  unhealthy,  old  and  unsightly  trees 
were  removed  to  make  way  for  a  healthy 
young  stand.  With  the  accurate  loca- 
tion of  the  sites  of  the  various  projected 
buildings  of  the  school  such  landscape 
gardening  as  was  conceived  to  be  neces- 
sary was  undertaken,  with  the  idea  in 
mind  of  endeavoring  to  develop  the  nat- 
ural beauties  of  the  grounds,  and  as  far 
as  possible  to  keep  them  in  a  state  of 
nature.  There  has  been  little  effort  to- 
ward formal  landscape  gardening. 

The  requirements  of  the  university  in 
buildings  were  carefully  set  forth  in  the 
specifications  which  the  university  au- 
thorities adopted,  after  anxious  consid- 
eration, and  promulgated  when  asking  for 
submission  of  plans,  and  it  is  instructive 
to  know  what  these  buildings  were,  and 
to  consider  how  they  were  disposed  with 
regard  to  each  other  in  the  architectural 
arrangement  which  at  last  won  the  ap- 
proval of  the  authorities. 

First  of  all,  the  requirements  of  the 
university  in  buildings  were  conceived 
to  be  as  follows  :  1,  An  academic  building, 
Oilman  Hall ;  2,  a  chemical  laboratory ;  3,. 


INTERIOR  OF  MAIN  COURT,  LOOKING  TOWARD  ACADEMIC  BUILDING,  JOHNS  HOPKINS 
UNIVERSITY,  HOMEWOOD,  BALTIMORE. 


s 


486 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


a  geological  laboratory;  4,  a  biological 
laboratory ;  5,  a  physical  laboratory ;  6,  a 
heat,  light  and  power  plant ;  7  and  8,  dor- 
mitories and  a  dining  hall ;  9,  a  mechan- 
ical and  electrical  engineering  building; 
10,  a  civil  and  mining  engineering  build- 
ing; 11,  a  gymnasium  ;  12,  a  student  hall ; 
13,  a  classroom  building;  14,  a  memorial 
building  and  chapel;  15,  a  president's 
house;  16,  a  faculty  club;  17,  an  assem- 
bly hall ;  18,  an  administration  building ; 
19,  an  astronomical  observatory. 

Now,  how  were  the  conditions  im- 
plied in  this  list  met 
and  developed  into 
an  acceptable  plan? 
First  of  all,  the  en- 
trance to  the  uni- 
versity grounds  was 
fixed  on  Charles 
street,  about  mid- 
way up  the  eastern 
side  of  the  grounds. 
Here  stood  Home- 
wood,  the  tonal  key 
of  the  new  group, 
on  a  little  eminence 
of  ground  about  fif- 
teen feet  above  the 
level  of  the  street. 
At  this  point,  then, 
was  established  a 
graded  semi  -  circle, 
"The  Bowl,"  as  it 
has  come  to  be 
known  in  Baltimore,  with  Home- 
wood  on  the  right  of  the  rim.  Op- 
posite Homewood  is  to  be  built  the 
president's  residence,  a  structure  similar 
in  exterior  detail  to  the  former,  which  is 
to  be  used  probably  as  the  Faculty  Club. 
Between  the  two  is  planned  the  Adminis- 
tration Building,  with  an  arched  gateway 
in  the  middle,  giving  access  to  the  main 
•quadrangle.  Connecting  the  Administra- 
tion Building  and  the  two  structures  ad- 
jacent to  it  are  colonnades  set  on  the 
edge  of  The  Bowl. 

Standing  at  the  entrance  of  the  main 
quadrangle  to-day  one  sees  directly  ahead 
over  the  level  turf  the  springy,  beautiful 
facade  of  Oilman  Hall,  in  which  are  to 
be  housed  the  library  and  the  "human- 
itarian," or  non-laboratory,  apartments 
of  the  university.  The  quadrangle  is 
flanked  by  four  Laboratory  Buildings ; 


DETAIL— ACADEMIC    BUILDING,   JOHNS 
HOPKINS  UNIVERSITY. 


Physics  and  Geology,  on  the  left ;  Chem- 
istry and  Biology,  on  the  right.  All  of 
the  buildings  of  this  quadrangle  are- con- 
nected by  tunnels  and  arcades,  which  are 
particularly  effective  architecturally  and 
which  allow  passage  from  one  to  anoth- 
er without  exposure  to  the  weather. 

Between  the  Laboratory  Buildings  on 
either  side  of  the  quadrangle  are  broad 
brick  and  marble  colonial  stairs,  which 
lead  to  quadrangles  of  lower  level  than 
the  first.  Standing  at  the  head  of  the 
steps,  which  lead  to  the  southern,  or  left, 
of  these  subsidiary 
quadrangles,  one 
finds  one's  self  gaz- 
ing upon  the  Engi- 
neering Buildings  of 
the  university.  Upon 
the  small  quad- 
rangle, to  the  north, 
are  to  be  found  un- 
dergraduate build- 
ings, the  vista  being 
closed  by  a  student 
hall. 

To  the  rear  of  Oil- 
man   Hall,    but    not 
discernible  from  the 
main     quadrangle, 
are  situated  the  Bo- 
tanical Laboratories 
and  garden,  the  lat- 
ter in  a  fine  state  of 
cultivation. 
The  heat,  light  and  power  plant  of  the 
group  has  been  placed  back  of  the  Me- 
chanical Engineering  Building. 

In  the  extreme  northern  corner  of  the 
grounds  is  the  athletic  field,  and  near  it 
to  the  south  is  planned  the  gymnasium. 
The  dormitories  are  to  lie  between  the 
athletic  field  and  the  main  group  of 
buildings,  but  distributed  parallel  to,  and 
not  far  from,  Charles  street,  which  is 
their  most  convenient  exit  from  the 
school.  In  the  scheme  of  architecture 
the  dormitories  form  a  connecting  link 
between  the  group  of  buildings  planned 
for  work  and  the  recreation  group — 
including  the  gymnasium  and  athletic 
field. 

The  axes  of  the  university  plan  are 
parallel  with  and  perpendicular  to 
Charles  street. 

Passing  from  a  consideration  of  the 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


487 


general  plan  to  individual  developments 
thereof,  it  may  be  said  that  a  visitor  to 
Homewood  at  this  time  would  find  much 
accomplished,    much    under    way,    and 
much  still  in  the  void.    The  grading  has 
practically  all  been  done.     The  general 
progress  of  the  whole  development  may 
be     briefly     summarized     as     follows : 
Homewood     completed     one     hundred 
years  ago ;  the  Academic  Building,  Gil- 
man Hall   (library  and  seminaries)   fin- 
ished and  to  be  occupied  probably  next 
term — the    library   to    be   moved    to    its 
new  home  probably  during  the  summer 
months,  Chemical  Laboratory,  site  pre- 
pared and  plans  ready  for  bids ;  Geolog- 
ical Laboratory,  site  prepared  and  pre- 
liminary plans  ready ;  Biological  Labora- 
tory, to  be  started ;  Physical  Laboratory, 
site  cleared  and  bids  soon  to  be  invited; 
Mechanical   and   Electrical   Engineering 
Building,  completed  and  in  use  since  last 
October ;  Civil-Mining  Engineering  Build- 
ing, ground  broken  for  construction,  ex- 
pected to  be  completed  during  this  year ; 
heat,  light  and  power  plant,  completed 
and  in  use ;  botanical  laboratory  and  gar- 
dens, completed  in  1908  and  in  use  since 
then ;  athletic  field  and  stands,  completed 
and  in  use  for  several  years.    All  of  the 
rest  of  the  program  of  the  school  has 
yet  to  be  accomplished,  but  the  ground 
work  in  all  has  been  done. 

A  visit  to  Gilman  Hall,  the  dominant 
member  of  the  principal  group,  reveals 
many  ingenuities  of  construction  and 
novelties  of  design  in  addition  to  beauty 
and  simplicity  of  exterior.  Its  aspect  at 
the  head  of  the  quadrangle,  which  one 
faces  when  entering  the  grounds  of  the 
new  university,  has  been  aptly  summed 
up  by  M.  Llewellyn  Raney,  librarian  of 
Johns  Hopkins :  "Here  is  the  Carroll 
mansion's  prophecy  come  to  fulfilment. 
Homelike,  simple,  dignified,  preserving 
the  old  portico  multiplied  by  two,  it  is 
at  once  marked  as  the  capitol  of  the 
campus  by  the  clock-tower,  which  rises 
120  feet  from  the  ground  level,  inevitably 
carrying  one's  mind  back  to  Independence 
Hall."  ' 

It  is  an  ample  and  logical  development 
of  the  theme  of  the  whole  university 
group. 

In   cubic    feet   Gilman    Hall   is   three 


BOTANICAL  LABORATORY   FROM  NORTH  COL- 
ONNADE OF  ACADEMIC  BUILDING. 

times  the  size  of  one  of  its  laboratory 
neighbors  and  about  one-half  again  as 
large  as  McCoy  Hall,  the  member  of 
the  old  university  group  whose1  place  it 
is  destined  to  fill.  Its  great  bulk,  how- 
ever, is  effectively  concealed  in  front 
by  having  one  story  and  a  half  buried 
and  both  corners  recessed  to  a  width  and 
depth  of  20  feet,  except  for  one  story 
stair-halls.  Thus,  though  the  falling 
ground  to  the  rear  gives  the  service  of 
four  floors,  the  front  elevation  appears 


GLIMPSE  THROUGH   SOUTH  COLONNADE 
OF  ACADEMIC  BUILDING. 


488 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


DETAIL— MAIN  READING   ROOM,  ACADEMIC   BUILDING,  JOHNS  HOPKINS  UNIVERSITY. 

HOMEWOOD,  BALTIMORE. 
Parker,  Thomas  &  Rice,  Architects. 


NORTH  WING  OF  MAIN  READING  ROOM,  JOHNS  HOPKINS  UNIVERSITY,   HOMEWOOD, 

BALTIMORE. 
Parker,  Thomas  &  Rice,  Architects. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


489 


to  be  that  of  a  two-and-a-half-story 
structure.  It  takes  but  a  judicious  plant- 
ing of  trees  to  give  an  apparent  front- 
age of  164  feet  (which  is  almost  exactly 
the  depth  of  the  building)  as  against  the 
wing-to-wing  measurement  of  204  feet. 

The  general  arrangement  is  that  of  a 
hollow  square  with  additions  to  every 
side — portico  in  front,  shallow  wings  to 
north  and  south,  and  semi-circle  at  the 
rear.  The  lowering  of  the  facade  has 
had  the  further  advantage  of  having 
made  the  main  entrance  to  what  is  prac- 
tically the  second  floor  of  the  building, 
so  that  one  need  ascend  or  descend  but 
one  flight  of  stairs  to  reach  the  other  two 
floors. 

Entering  the  building  from  the  front, 
the  square  vestibule  leads  directly  to  a 
chamber  28  feet  by  59  feet,  the  decora- 
tive entrance  room  of  the  building — 
probably  to  be  furnished  as  the  Daniel 
C.  Oilman  Memorial  Room.  With  win- 
dows overlooking  the  court,  a  fireplace 
on  either  side,  this  room  offers  excellent 
opportunity.  Over  the  fireplace  to  the 
left  is  to  be  placed  a  large  portrait  plaque 
in  low  relief  of  President  Oilman,  Hop- 
kins' first  chief  executive,  for  whom  the 
building  is  named. 

A  generous  corridor  with  niches  for 
busts  and  sides  free  for  display  or  deco- 
ration leads  across  the  court  to  the  read- 
ing room.  Stretching  the  full  width  of 
the  rear  of  the  building,  this  room  has  a 
floor  area  of  more  than  6,000  square  feet. 
Its  odd  proportion,  great  length  and  shal- 
low depth,  is  saved  from  object-ion  by  the 
fact  that  it  falls  into  three  parts,  the  two 
end  portions  having  another  story  above 
them,  but  the  central  portion,  not  thus 
affected,  being  covered  with  an  arched 
roof.  It  expands  westward  into  a  semi- 
circle overlooking  the  botanical  garden. 
The  windows  are  set  high  above  the 
floor  to  facilitate  the  disposition  of  the 
shelves  and  the  radiators  are  recessed. 
There  is  shelf  space  in  the  room  for 
15,000  volumes  of  ordinary  proportion 
and  500  periodicals.  In  the  center  is  the 
desk  for  the  attendant  and  two  doors  di- 
rectly under  his  observation  lead  to  the 
stack  rooms. 

The  stack  rooms  can  be  completely 
isolated  from  the  rest  of  the  building 


by  means  of  fire-doors,  easily  swung  to, 
thus  giving  this  part  of  the  building  as 
nearly  as  possible  the  qualities  of  a  fire- 
proof vault.  This  does  not  mean  that 
if  Oilman  Hall  were  to  be  completely 
consumed  the  books  would  not  suf- 
fer, but  it  does  mean  that  as  far  as  hu- 
man ingenuity  can  provide  they  would 
be  protected.  The  stack  rooms  are  built 
on  their  own  foundations,  from  the 
ground  up,  thus  insuring  solidity  to  the 
frame-work  of  the  shelves,  which  is  of 
steel  and  of  continuous  piece  from  the 
foundations. 

An  unique  feature  of  the  Hopkins 
library  has  been  its'  system  of  depart- 
mental libraries.  These  are  cozy  corners, 
cubby-holes  in  the  library  which  can  be 
secluded  and  in  which  books  of  one  de- 
partment are  kept, — "segregated"  as  the 
students  have  it.  This  plan  has  been  pre- 
served and  developed  in  the  new  library. 
An  inspection  of  the  floor  plans  of  the 
building  will  show  that  the  stack  rooms 
are  flanked  by  corridors,  on  the  far  side 
of  which  are  class-rooms  and  professors' 
offices.  Very  well,  then,  on  the  library 
side  of  the  corridor  have  been  arranged 
the  books  which  the  corresponding  classes 
use  in  their  work.  It  is  a  very  simple 
matter  for  the  classes  to  pass  across  the 
corridor  through  departmental  doors  to 
the  privacy  of  the  room  provided  for 
them  by  their  own  stacks.  All  other  en- 
trances to  the  stack  rooms  are  arranged 
so  that  they  can  be  controlled  from  a 
single  desk  on  the  first  floor.  One  librar- 
ian, therefore,  can  control  all  of  the 
stacks  in  use. 

Measurement  disclosed  the  fact  that 
there  were  five  miles  of  shelving  in  Mc- 
Coy Hall, — the  old  library  home.  In 
Homewood  ten  miles  of  shelving  have 
been  provided. 

The  distribution  of  space  to  the  class- 
rooms has  been  equally  generous.  There 
are  twice  as  many  undergraduate  class- 
rooms at  Homewood  as  in  the  old  quar- 
ters and  these  range  in  size  from  240  to 
1,200  square  feet  floor  area.  There  is  a 
550  square  foot  seminar  room  for  each 
graduate  department, — and,  in  four 
cases,  two  of  them.  There  is  a  12  feet 
by  20  feet  office  for  every  officer  and 
instructor. 


490 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


CE 


m  >,, 

M-,    |J  l^'yg^_ 


GEOLOGICAL  LABORATORY,  JOHNS  HOPKINS  UNIVERSITY,  HOMEWOOD,  BALTIMORE. 
Walter  Cook  and  Winthrop  A.  Welch,  Architects. 


The  floor  of  the  main  reading-room 
has  been  laid  with  cork,  but  the  floors 
throughout  the  rest  of  this  part  of  the 
building  and  of  the  book  decks  are 
formed  of  terrazzo,  which  is  durable, 
reasonably  quiet  and  exceedingly  solid 
to  the  feet. 

The  most  frequently  used  entrances  to 
Oilman  Hall  are  expected  to  be  those  at 
the  northeast  and  southeast  corners  of 
the  building,  approached  along  the  sides 
of  the  quadrangle.  Teams,  of  course, 
will  not  be  allowed  in  the  quadrangle,  so 
an  entrance  for  them  has  been  made  from 
the  rear  and  through  a  tunnel  in  the  front 
of  the  building  which  will  make  possible 
the  delivery  of  supplies  at  a  point  where 
they  can  be  distributed  quickly  and  with  a 
minimum  of  effort  to  any  department. 

From  the  rear  of  Gilman  Hall  and  to 


the  north  may  be  seen  the  botanical  la- 
boratory and  garden,  the  former  a  long, 
low  glass  building  of  no  unusual  features 
but  carrying  out  in  its  aspect  the  general 
theme  of  the  university  buildings.  The 
garden  is  a  square  of  ground  one  hundred 
yards  on  a  side  set  unsymmetrically  to  the 
axes  of  the  grounds.  In  its  plan  it  differs 
from  most  botanical  gardens  in  that  it  is 
quite  formal,  this  arrangement  being 
thoroughly  in  harmony  with  the  Georgian 
spirit.  The  outline  of  the  garden  as  a 
whole  is  marked  by  hedges  of  hemlock. 
It  contains  seventeen  beds  bordered  with 
myrtle  and  separated  one  from  another 
by  well-kept  cinder  walks.  The  compact 
plan  gives  a  large  amount  of  bedding 
space  in  which  there  is  accommodation 
for  over  2,000  shrubs  or1  clumps  of  her- 
baceous plants. 


PHYSICAL   LABORATORY,   JOHNS  HOPKINS  UNIVERSITY,   HOMEWOOD,   BALTIMORE. 

Wyatt  &  Nolting,  Architects. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


491 


CHEMICAL  LABORATORY,   JOHNS  HOPKINS  UNIVERSITY,   HOMEWOOD,   BALTIMORE. 
Carrere   &  Hastings,  Architects. 


Passing  from  Oilman  Hall  to  the  Me- 
chanical and  Electrical  Engineering 
Building  one  finds  the  same  careful  plan- 
ning that  marks  the  former  structure. 
The  Engineering  Building,  it  may  be  well 
to  note,  is  one  of  two  buildings  to  be 
built  by  State  of  Maryland  appropriation 
and  forming  part  of  a  new  department 
(or,  more  exactly,  a  revived  department) 
of  the  university. 

The  shop-room  is  a  large  and  airy 
enclosure,  running  the  whole  width  of 
the  rear  of  the  building,  with  steel  skele- 
ton windows  and  200-ton  travelling 
crane.  Its  walls  are  faced  with  semi- 
glazed  brick  which  will  not  absorb 
grease  and  which  will  reflect  light  in  all 
directions.  The  concrete  floor  is  pro- 
vided with  channel  irons  to  which  pieces 
of  apparatus  can  be  fixed,  thus  doing 
away  with  the  necessity  for  tearing  up 
the  concrete  floor  to  provide  a  firm  base 
every  time  a  fixture  is  moved  to  a  new 
location.  This  is  all  in  accordance  with 
modern  shop  practice. 

In  the  heat,  light  and  power  plant, 
visited  next,  the  perplexing  heating  and 
lighting  problems  which  confronted  the 
designers  of  the  Homewood  group  have 
been  attacked  and  the  building  contains 
many  additional  small  features  of  design 
not  ordinarily  associated  with  structures 
of  this  character.  As  an  instance  of  this 
latter  feature,  several  different  types  of 
engine  have  been  installed  in  the  dynamo 
room,  though  all  do  the  same  work,  in 


order  that  students  in  the  engineering 
department  may  have  opportunity  to  ob- 
serve these  different  types  of  engine  at 
work.  The  smoke  stack  has  had  built 
upon  it  at  different  levels  two  platforms 
with  observation  tubes  through  the  stack 
so  that  students  may  be  able  to  make 
smoke  and  other  tests.  All  of  the  water 
used  in  the  boilers  may  be  passed  over 
scales  so  that  its  quantity  can  be  accurate- 
ly determined,  and  it  comes  from  the  con- 
densers to  other  scales  so  that  it  may  be 
once  more  measured.  It  is  hoped  that 
much  illuminating  research  work  may  be 
done  in  the  power  building  while  it  serves 
its  own  humble  purpose  of  keeping  the 
other  buildings  warm  and  lighted. 

One  of  the  engineering  features  in  con- 
nection with  this  part  of  the  university 
that  will  attract  attention  is  the  concrete 
tunnel  going  from  this  plant  to  every  part 
of  the  grounds  and  conveying  the  steam 
pipes  and  electric  wires  which  will  carry 
heat,  power  and  light  to  the  various  build- 
ings. This  tunnel  is  of  sufficient  height 
for  two  men  to  comfortably  walk  through 
it  abreast  at  any  point ;  the  wires,  tubes, 
and  pipes  which  it  contains  are  always  ac- 
cessible and  there  will  never  be  necessity 
for  tearing  up  the  grounds  to  reach  some 
hidden  leak  or  trouble. 

At  the  far  northern  corner  of  the 
Homewood  tract  is  the  athletic  field 
which  contains  a  quarter  mile  track  and  a 
220  yard  straightaway,  a  lacrosse  or  foot- 
ball ground,  base-ball  diamond  and  tennis 


492 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


MECHANICAL  AND  ELECTRICAL  ENGINEERING  BUILDING,  JOHNS  HOPKINS  UNIVERSITY, 

HOME  WOOD,  BALTIMORE. 
J.  E.  Sperry,  Architect. 


courts,  in  addition  to  the  customary 
dressing  rooms.  Two  large  concrete 
stands  for  spectators  have  been  erected 
and  a  site  has  been  arranged  for  a  third 
if  these  should  prove  incapable  of  ac- 
commodating the  crowds. 

The  dormitories  have  been  planned  on 
the  individual  unit  system,  with  accom- 
modations for  250  students  in  a  unit. 

In  addition  to  having  established  the 
key  for  the  university  group  and  having 
made  the  general  ground  plan  of  develop- 
ment, Parker,  Thomas  and  Rice  designed 
Oilman  Hall,  the  heat,  light  and  power 
plant  and  are  developing  the  plans  for  the 
Administration  Building;  the  Chemical 
Laboratory  was  designed  by  Carrere  and 
Hastings,  of  New  York,  an  unique  fea- 
ture of  this  building  being  a  system  of 
open  drains  and  individual  hood  exhausts 


over  the  separate  chemical  desks ;  the 
Physical  Laboratory  by  Wyatt  and  Nolt- 
ing,  of  Baltimore  ;  the  Geological  Labora- 
tory, by  Walter  Cook  and  Winthrop  A. 
Welch,  of  New  York ;  and  the  Engineer- 
ing Buildings  by  J.  E.  Sperry,  of  Balti- 
more. 

In  the  development  of  the  Homewood 
group  its  architects  seem  to  have  found 
a  peculiarly  congenial  theme  and  the  ani- 
mation and  interest  which  they  have 
shown  therein  is  evident  in  their  work  as 
now  physically  set  forth.  The  future  de- 
velopment of  this  fine  group  will  go  on 
with  more  or  less  speed  as  the  finances  of 
the  institution  are  plethoric  or  lean  and 
empty.  At  all  events,  the  right  note  has 
been  clearly  struck  and  Hopkins  has  laid 
out  a  work  thoroughly  consonant  with 
her  high  ideal  and  inheritance. 


Ifj 


ROMAN   ARCHITECTVRE 
AND    ITS    CRITICS 

^rA.D.F.HAMLlN 

PART   II  —      &he    DEFENCE 


IN  a  previous  paper  I  have  set  forth  the 
counts  of  the  indictment  which  certain 
critics  have  brought  in  against  Ro- 
man architecture.  I  propose  in  this  paper 
to  present  the  defense.  I  shall  first  of 
all  demur  to  the  indictment  as  being 
based  not  on  sound  reasoning  from  the 
facts,  but  on  prejudice  and  mere  tradi- 
tions. Secondly,  I  shall  endeavor  to  ex- 
pose the  contradictions  in  the  testimony 
of  the  critics.  I  shall  then,  thirdly,  an- 
swer to  each  of  the  five  counts  of  the  in- 
dictment, and  shall  close  by  presenting 
what  I  believe  to  be  a  fair  and  unpreju- 
diced estimate  of  Roman  architecture  as 
a  whole. 

i. 

Prejudice,  in  architectural  criticism,  is 
not  the  mere  preference  of  one  style  over 
another.  That  is  in  itself  both  natural 
and  legitimate.  When,  however,  the 
preference  is  based  on  inadequate  data, 
and  takes  on  an  intensity  of  hostility  that 
blinds  the  critic  to  the  real  merits  of  the 
less-esteemed  or  disesteemed  style,  it  de- 
generates into,  as  it  springs  from,  unrea- 
soning prejudice.  It  betrays  itself  in  vio- 
lence of  language,  in  the  refusal  to  con- 
cede merits  which  are  conspicuous  to  the 
impartial  observer,  or  at  least  in  the  re- 
jection of  the  favorable  conclusions 
which  one  might  infer  from  the  praise 
which  they  grudgingly  bestpw  upon  un- 
deniable excellences.  All  these  evidences 
of  prejudice  appear  in  the  critics  of  both 
the  ultra-Hellenic  and  the  ultra-Gothic 
groups ;  violent  language,  in  many  of  the 
passages  I  have  quoted ;  blindness  to  ob- 
vious merit,  as  I  shall  later  show ;  refusal 
to  recognize  the  significance  of  their  own 
grudging  praise,  as  will  appear  in  the 
contradictions  between  their  own  testi- 
monies in  the  next  section. 

That  this  prejudice,  this  hostility  to  all 


Roman  forms  of  artistic  expression,  this 
reluctance  to  concede  to  Roman  architec- 
ture any  of  the  higher  qualities,  spring 
largely  from  a  mere  tradition  of  criticism, 
any  careful  reader  must,  I  think,  conclude 
who  studies  the  literature  of  the  Greek 
and  Gothic  revivals  in  England.  I  have 
already  pointed  out  that  these  move- 
ments were  intellectual  and  sentimental 
rather  than  artistic  movements.  During 
the  first  half  of  the  nineteenth  century 
the  habit  became  general  of  disparaging 
Roman  architecture  as  compared  with 
the  Greek  and  the  Gothic;  but  that  the 
Greek  revival  was  hardly  the  spontaneous 
expression  of  a  deeply  esthetic  spirit  let 
the  British  Museum  and  the  "National 
Monument"  at  Edinburgh  testify!  That 
the  early  Gothic  revivalists  came  no  near- 
er to  a  true  artistic  inspiration  is  wit- 
nessed by  the  distressing  inanities  to 
which  they  gave  being.  Yet  the  Gothicists 
of  that  day  disparaged  the  "pagan"  archi- 
tecture of  Rome  by  comparison  with  their 
own  petty  ideals  of  the  Gothic,  even  more 
contemptuously  than  did  the  Hellenists 
by  comparison  with  their  inadequate  con- 
ceptions of  Greek  architecture.  The  truth 
is  that  in  those  days  there  were  few  or 
none  who  possessed  any  deep  under- 
standing of  architecture  itself,  and  it  is 
very  clear  that  few  of  them  had  grasped 
the  real  significance  and  inner  spirit  and 
content  even  of  the  styles  which  they 
praised.  It  is  this  Early  Victorian  tradi- 
tion of  depreciation  of  Roman  art  which 
the  anti-Roman  critics  of  our  own  day 
have  inherited  and  perpetuated,  ignoring 
all  the  wider  and  better  knowledge  we 
now  possess  of  the  Roman  achievement, 
and  refusing  to  yield  to  the  testimony  of 
the  monuments  themselves.  Today  there 
are  broader  views  and  a  better  under- 
standing of  what  architecture  really  is 
than  was  the  case  fifty  years  ago.  Books 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


495 


and  photographs  and  travel  have  made 
us  better  acquainted  with  the  works  of 
all  the  styles.  Is  it  not  time  that  intelli- 
gent persons  who  write  on  architecture 
should  open  their  minds  to  all  this  new 
light?  Can  we  not  discard  the  outworn 
apparatus  of  Early  and  Mid- Victorian 
criticism,  and  form  our  judgments  upon 
the  evidence  that  is  spread  before  us? 

n. 

The  critics  whom  I  have  quoted  re- 
peatedly contradict  their  own  adverse 
judgments.  The  virility,  majesty  and 
daring  originality  of  many  Roman  works, 
and  the  exquisite  beauty  of  some  of 
them,  extort  praise  which  is  all  the  more 
sincere  and  certainly  the  more  significant 
for  being  so  reluctant.  Fergusson,  after 
declaring  that  the  Roman  "haste  to  en- 
joy" seems  incompatible  with  the  produc- 
tion of  great  architecture,  confesses  that 
"there  is  a  greatness  in  the  mass,  a  gran- 
deur in  the  conception,  and  a  certain  ex- 
pression of  power  in  all  these  Roman  re- 
mains, which  never  fail  to  strike  the  be- 
holder with  awe,  and  force  admiration 
from  him  despite  his  better  judgment." 
But  why  "despite  his  better  judgment"? 
Why  is  it  a  worse  judgment  to  yield  to 
the  natural  and  inevitable  emotion  kin- 
dled by  these  works?  Before  the  huge 
mass  of  the  Roman  ruins  unadorned  in 
naked  grandeur  "criticism  is  disarmed," 
he  says,  "and  the  spectator  stands  awe- 
struck at  its  majesty."*  Of  the  Coliseum 
he  says,  "It  is  worthy  of  all  or  nearly  all 
the  admiration  of  which  it  has  been  the 
object,"  and  produces  "an  effect  against 
which  the  critic  struggles  in  vain."f  Poor 
struggling  critic — but  why  struggle? 
Why  not  drop  the  shackles  of  a  narrow 
tradition  and  yield  ungrudgingly  to  the 
enthusiasm  which  that  mighty  work  in- 
spires,? Again,  on  page  296  of  the  same 
work  we  read  of  the  Pantheon  and  Tem- 
ple of  Peace  (by  which  the  author  means 
the  Basilica  of  Constantine)  that  they 
"are  to  this  hour  unsurpassed  for  bold- 
ness of  conception  and  justness  of  ap- 
preciation of  the  manner  in  which  the 
new  method  ought  to  be  applied." 

•History    of    Architecture    in    All    Countries,    Vol. 
I     294 
'fOp.'  cit.    I,    326. 


Mr.  Sturgis  indulges  less  than  some 
modern  critics  in  hostile  animadversions 
on  Roman  art;  but  he  frequently  alludes 
to  "bad  taste,"  "clumsy  arrangement," 
"deliberate  copying  and  imitation  of 
Greek  models"  and  the  "sham  architec- 
ture" of  the  Roman  columnar  arcade. 
Nevertheless  he  is  compelled  to  admit,  in 
specific  cases,  careful  design  and  finish, 
conscientious  execution,  elegance  and 
beauty  of  detail.  The  round  temple  at 
Tivoli  "must  have  been  the  work  of  a  de- 
signer possessed  of  great  independence 
of  spirit."  The  interior  of  the  Pantheon 
has  "an  ineffable  charm,"  "there  is  no 
interior  in  the  world  more  impressive;" 
and  its  entire  design  and  scale  seem  to 
justify  that  decorative  use  of  the  columns 
and  entablatures  which  in  other  places  the 
author  decries  or  condemns.  In  his  His- 
tory of  Architecture  (Vol.  I,  p.  382)  he 
admits  that  "men  of  truly  artistic  and 
truly  refined  sense  of  design"  admire  the 
Roman  achievement  of  vastness,  grandeur 
and  splendor  in  the  service  of  utility  even 
when  it  lacks  the  delicacy  and  refinement 
of  Greek  design.  The  Roman  stucco- 
decorations  "are  so  marvelous  that  it  is 
worthy  of  a  special  study  to  examine, 
date  and  classify  them."  Chapter  VII  of 
this  volume  is  chiefly  devoted  to  these 
works,  which  are  praised  for  "the  sur- 
passing excellence  of  the  modeling  and 
the  artistic  conception,"  "for  their  effec- 
tive simple  decoration"  and  like  quali- 
ties. He  declares  that  the  relief  sculpture 
of  the  Romans,  from  Augustus  to  Trajan, 
"reached  an  approximate  perfection  re- 
minding us  of  Greek  work  of  a  good  pe- 
riod," and  that  "the  very  refinement  of 
curve  and  the  delicacy  of  relief  which 
we  fancy  foreign  to  ancient  Roman  ideas 
of  splendor  are,  after  all,  of  imperial 
Roman  origin"  (p.  425).  Mr.  Statham, 
in  spite  of  his  severe  strictures  upon 
many  features  of  Roman  architecture  and 
his  assertions  of  its  inferior  taste  and  de- 
ficient originality,  recognizes. the  exceed- 
ing beauty  of  the  Corinthian  order  and 
the  majesty  and  excellent  planning  of 
the  great  works  of  the  Romans.  And 
even  Mr.  Porter,  for  whom  the  adjectives 
vulgar,  dreary,  pretentious,  blatant  and 
cut-and-dried,  and  the  nouns  sham, 
coarseness,  pomposity  and  blatancy  hard- 


I 


FIG.  9.    TEMPLE  OF  VENUS,  POMPEII.    DETAIL 
OF    ORDERS.      FROM    A     FRENCH    DRAWING. 


FIG.  8.  CORINTHIAN  ORDER  OF  TEMPLE  OF 
CASTOR  AND  POLLUX.  FROM  CAST  IN  WILLARD 
COLLECTION,  METROPOLITAN  MUSEUM  OF  ART. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


499 


ly  suffice  for  his  characterizations  of 
Roman  architecture,  is  constrained  to 
acknowledge  some  good  in  it.  To  the 
imitation  of  Greek  models,  he  says,  "the 
Roman  genius  added  certain  new  and 
original  features  of  its  own."  "Architec- 
tural construction  the  practical  Roman 
developed  to  a  point  far  ahead  of  any- 
thing that  had  hitherto  been  reached." 
In  another  passage  he  declares  that  the 
Roman  groined  vault  was  the  parent  of 
medieval  architecture,  and  that  no  other 
structural  invention  of  any  age  can  out- 
reach it  in  importance.  Reber  considers 
that  "in  Roman  architecture  are  found 
great  intelligence  in  the  solution  of  the 
constructive  problem  involved  in  the  en- 
closing of  large  spaces,  great  independ- 
ence in  the  development  of  technical  per- 
fection, and  a  masterly  conformity  to  the 
purpose  of  the  structure." 

Thus  not  only  the  judicious  critics  and 
the  mildly  hostile,  but  even  the  most 
rabidly  anti-Roman  are  compelled,  reluct- 
antly sometimes,  "struggling"  and  "in 
spite  of  their  better  judgment"  to  admit 
in  Roman  architecture  substantial  merits, 
fundamental  excellences  of  a  very  high 
order,  in  the  light  of  which  the  violence 
and  satirical  hostility  of  their  language  in 
other  passages  appear  quite  uncalled  for. 
When  a  critic  on  one  page  calls  the 
Corinthian  order  the  "most  blatant"  of 
all  the  orders,  but  on  another  implies  that 
the  Corinthian  capital  is  the  most  beauti- 
ful.of  all  capitals,  what  are  we  to  think 
of  his  fair-mindedness  or  his  consistency  ? 
Another,  who  insists  repeatedly  on  the 
utter  lack  of  originality  of  the  Romans, 
can  only  say  in  support  of  this  contention 
when  brought  face  to  face  with  the  su- 
perb double  temple  of  Venus  and  Rome : 
"All  this,  except  the  building  in  mortar- 
masonry  and  the  idea  of  a  vault" — rather 
important  exceptions,  one  is  tempted  to 
remark — "might  have  occurred  to  a 
Greek.  Perhaps  it  did  occur  to  some  of 
the  engineers  employed  by  the  successors 
of  Alexander."  "Might  have  occurred," 
"perhaps  did  occur."  What  sort  of  criti- 
cal reasoning  is  this  ?  By  similar  reason- 
ing applied  to  Hamlet  any  one  may  ef- 
fectually dispose  of  all  claim  to  originality 
in  any  of  Shakespeare's  works.  I  could 
multiply  instances  of  similar  contradic- 
tions and  inconsistencies.  It  would  seem 


to  the  simple-minded  reader  who  has  not 
been  brought  up,  on  a  diet  of  traditional 
Early  and  Mid- Victorian  criticism,  to  re- 
gard everything  Greek  as  supremely  per- 
fect, and  everything  post-Hellenic  and 
pre-Gothic  as  debased  and  vulgar — it 
would  seem  as  though  such  important 
admissions  by  the  witnesses  for  the  prose- 
cution tended  to  invalidate  fundamentally 
a  large  part  of  their  hostile  contentions. 

in. 

Let  us  now  take  up  seriatim  the  counts 
of  their  indictment. 

The  first  of  these*  alleges  the  absence 
of  the  higher  qualities  of  design — purity, 
refinement  and  good  taste,  and  the  preva- 
lence in  their  stead  of  vulgarity,  coarse- 
ness and  pompous  grandeur. 

This  charge  is  partly  true  and  mostly 
false.  It  is  one  of  those  sweeping  asser- 
tions which  uncritical  critics  delight  in 
making,  and  which  have  just  that  modi- 
cum of  foundation  in  fact  that  makes 
them  plausible  to  the  unwary  reader. 
Some  of  the  special  and  particular  refine- 
ments characteristic  of  Greek  architec- 
ture at  its  best  are  not  characteristic  of 
the  Roman  work  even  at  its  best,  at  least 
in  the  same  degree.  The  profiles  of  the 
Roman  moldings  are  less  subtle  than  the 
Greek,  and  optical  refinements  like  those 
of  the  Parthenon  are  less  frequent  and 
less  highly  developed  in  Roman  than  in 
Greek  work.  But  no  one  who  makes  a 
careful  study  of  Roman  architecture  as  a 
whole,  or  of  its  details,  will  allow  this  ad- 
mission to  be  stretched  to  the  denial  of 
refinement  and  good  taste  in  a  large  part 
of  the  really  notable  works  of  the  Roman 
builders.  Indeed,  one  may  go  so  far  as  to 
assert  that  one  of  the  evidences  of  their 
good  taste  is  the  very  fact  of  their  modi- 
fication of  the  subtle  curves  of  the  Greek 
molding  profiles  to  adapt  them  to  the 
very  different  types  of  design  in  which 
they  are  used  by  the  Romans.  Most  of 
the  Roman  moldings  are  enriched  by 
carving,  in  which  subtilities  of  profile  be- 
come less  important  or  disappear ;  the 
strong,  full  curves  of  the  Roman  profiles 
are  far  better  suited  to  such  enrichment, 
and  to  the  particular  combinations  in 
which  they  occur,  and  to  those  effects  of 
power  and  grandeur  and  scale  which  are 

*See  Architectural   Record   for  last  month. 


FIG.  11.  DETAIL  OF  ONE  OF  THE  NICHES 
IN  THE  PANTHEON,  ROME.  SHOWING 
ALSO  TOMB  OF  VICTOR  EMANUEL. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


501 


the  glory  as  they  were  the  aim  of  the 
Roman  designers,  than  the  Greek  profiles. 
For  nearly  two  thousand  years  architects 
have  been  designing  moldings,  cornices, 
archivolts,  bases,  capitals  and  entabla- 
tures, without  being  able  to  improve  in 
any  great  degree  on  the  Roman  combina- 
tions and  sequences  of  moldings.  The 
medieval  moldings,  which  are  neither 
Greek  nor  Roman,  we  may  omit  from 
present  consideration  because  they  be- 
long to  a  fundamentally  different  style, 
and  would  be  equally  out  of  place  on 
buildings  of  the  Greek  and  of  the  Ro- 
man type. 

Moreover,  there  are  important  cate- 
gories of  Roman  design  in  which  a  very 
Hellenic  sort  of  refinement  is  notably 
present.  In  much  of  the  Pompeiian  work, 
which  is,  like  so  many  of  the  Greek  build- 
ings, modest  in  scale,  there  is  observable 
a  remarkable  delicacy  of  design,  a  sen- 
sitive feeling  for  profile,  for  detail,  for 
relief  and  for  color,  which  impart  to  it 
a  peculiar  charm.  All  the  buildings  of 
the  like  class  and  date  (with  a  few  ex- 
ceptions) in  Rome  itself  have  perished, 
and  we  can  judge  of  their  quality  only 
by  the  "House  of  Livia,"  on  the  Palatine, 
some  tombs  on  the  Via  Latina,  and  some 
stucco  reliefs  in  the  Museo  delle  Terme 
and  the  Baths  of  Titus.  But  as  these 
show  the  same  qualities  as  the  Pom- 
peiian examples  in  even  higher  degree, 
we  may  infer  that  in  their  buildings  of 
more  modest  purpose  and  dimensions  the 
Romans  displayed  everywhere  many  of 
those  higher  qualities  of  taste  and  refine- 
ment which  they  are  so  often  declared  to 
lack.  I  have  already  quoted  Mr.  Sturgis' 
enthusiastic  characterizations  of  the 
Roman  stuccoes,  and  admission  of 
the  Hellenic  beauty  of  many  of  the 
Roman  decorative  reliefs.  I  believe  an 
appeal  to  the  monuments,  could  we  only 
see  them  as  they  once  stood,  complete  in 
their  original  environment,  would  con- 
vince every  impartial  reader  that  in 
even  the  grandest,  the  most  pompous, 
ostentatious  and  majestic  of  them,  the 
Temoles  of  the  Sun.  of  Venus  and  Rome, 
of  Castor  and  Pollux,  there  is  to  be 
found  an  element  of  high  refinement,  and 
evidence  of  a  true  and  pure  taste,  which 
the  critics  often  have  refused  to  concede. 
A  "rendered"  elevation  of  an  entablature 


gives  little  real  conception  of  its  true 
qualities;  and  most  of  the  literary  and 
Hellenistic  critics  appear  to  have  studied 
only  drawings  on  paper  and  not  the 
buildings  themselves.  That  is  to  say, 
they  have,  through  lack  of  trained  imag- 
ination, been  unable  to  reconstitute  the 
building  mentally  from  the  drawings  and, 
placing  it  in  its  proper  environment,  to 
judge  it  as  one  judges  an  extant  building 
to-day.  Let  one  study  even  the  cast  of 
the  capital  and  entablature  of  the  Temple 
of  Castor  and  Pollux  in  the  Metropoli- 
tan Museum  at  New  York,*  where  that 
fragment  is  lifted  to  its  proper  height 
from  the  floor,  and  one  discovers  that 
this  composition  which,  seen  in  draw- 
ings is  called  "overloaded"  with  orna- 
ment, is  really  enriched  with  a  most  deli- 
cately beautiful  frosting  of  carved  detail. 
Its  "magnificent,"  "pompous,"  "blatant" 
capital  and  cornice,  seen  in  their  proper 
place,  become  exquisite  in  the  perfection 
and  refinement  of  their  design.  What 
must  the  whole  temple  have  been !  and 
what  the  Forum  and  the  whole  group  of 
fora,  with  their  temples,  arches,  basilicas 
and  statues !  The  more  one  studies  the 
Roman  detail,  the  Roman  handling  of 
scale,  the  Roman  conceptions  of  design, 
the  more  one  is  impressed  with  the  ab- 
surdity of  the  idea  that  refinement  and 
good  taste  cannot  coexist  with  grandeur, 
splendor  and  even  an  overwhelming  mag- 
nificence. The  Pantheon,  bereft  of  the 
finer  adornments  of  the  huge  coffers  of 
its  mighty  dome,  remodeled,  undoubtedly 
to  its  detriment  in  the  eighteenth  cen- 
tury in  its  upper  portions,  still  offers  the 
eternal  refutation  of  that  idea.  One  of 
the  noblest  of  all  interiors,  almost  over- 
whelming in  its  majesty,  it  is  beautiful 
with  a  subtle  charm  of  quiet  refinement 
and  faultless  dignity  which  no  artistically 
sensitive  soul  can  deny.  The  Maison 
Carree  at  Nimes — the  only  other  monu- 
ment of  Roman  architecture  in  Europe 
which  remains  to  our  day  in  tolerable 
preservation — is  one  of  the  loveliest  be- 
quests of  classical  antiquity,  and  is  rightly 
the  admiration  and  delight  of  artistic 
souls  by  reason  of  those  very  qualities  of 
refinement  which  attract  them  in  Greek 
art. 


*See  Fig.  8,  on  page  497. 


FIG.  12.  CORINTHIAN  ORDER,  TEMPLE 
OF  THE  SIBYL  ("VESTA")  AT  TIVOLI. 
FROM  A  FRENCH  DRAWING  (A.  THOMAS). 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


503 


Moreover,  Roman  architecture  displays 
in  an  eminent  degree  three  distinguishing 
qualities  of  the  highest  aesthetic  value, 
possible  only  to  designers  possessed  of 
keen  artistic  sensibilities :  the  qualities  of 
perfect  scale,  proportion  and  relief. 
Every  architect  learns  in  the  trying  school 
of  experience  how  subtle  and  elusive  a 
thing  scale  is,  that  adjustment  of  dimen- 
sions in  every  member  and  detail  to  the 
dimensions  of  the  whole,  which  shall 
produce  the  desired  total  impression 
without  sacrifice  of  any  of  the  parts.  The 
Roman  designers  knew  how  to  make 
such  colossal  compositions  as  the  Pan- 
theon and  the  vast  halls  of  the  thermae 
or  of  the  Basilica  of  Maxentius  and  the 
Ulpian  Basilica  count  to  the  full  value 
of  their  imposing  dimensions,  by  the  scale 
of  all  their  subordinate  parts.  Insepar- 
able from  this  skilful  handling  of  scale, 
in  the  second  place,  and  equally  remark- 
able in  successful  achievement,  is  the 
Roman  treatment  of  proportion,  the 
spacing  of  columns,  the  proportioning  of 
superposed  orders,  the  form  and  pitch  of 
pediments,  the  relation  of  height  to  width 
of  arches,  and  the  still  more  important 
determination  of  the  relative  height, 
width  and  length  of  each  part  of  their 
vast  interiors.  They  very  seldom  erred 
in  these  relations ;  a  very  little  experimen- 
tation will  show  any  one  who  tries  it  how 
hard  it  is  to  improve  any  important 
Roman  building  by  altering  its  propor- 
tions. And,  thirdly,  in  the  matter  of 
carved  ornament,  it  was  the  Romans,  not 
the  Greeks,  who  discovered  and  taught 
the  world  the  secret  of  "varied  relief," 
by  which  the  subordinate  features  of  a 
decorative  composition  are  made  less 
prominent  than  its  more  important  parts, 
and  minor  elements  of  the  design  almost 
melt  into  the  background,  so  that  the  gen- 
eral movement  of  the  design  asserts  it- 
self to  the  spectator  at  a  distance  by  its 
strongly  massed  lights  and  shades,  while 
as  he  approaches  nearer  and  nearer,  the 
smaller  details  become  successively  vis- 
ible. Beside  the  strong,  sharp,  hard  re- 
lief of  the  Greek  carving,  as  seen  at  its 
best  in  the  Ere^heion,  for  example,  the 
tenderness  ai.^  delicacy  of  much  of  the 
Roman  carved  ornament  are  particularly 
noticeable.  This  is  seen  not  only  in  the 


exquisitely  modeled  stucco  reliefs  of  the 
houses  and  tombs,  but  as  well  in  the 
carved  friezes,  pilasters  and  panels  of 
buildings  of  monumental  size. 

Of  all  these  refinements  the  critics  we 
are  discussing  take  no  note.  The  arch- 
itecture they  contemn  is  an  architecture 
on  paper,  an  architecture  of  lithographs 
and  line  engravings,  not  the  architecture 
of  Roman  actuality. 

IV. 

The  second  count  in  the  indictment 
alleges  against  the  Roman  architecture  a 
plagiarism  which  travesties  the  forms  of 
Greek  architecture  and  misapplies  them, 
thereby  demonstrating  a  total  lack  of 
originality.  This  is  based,  of  course, 
solely  on  the  Roman  "orders :"  not  even 
the  most  hardened  anti-Roman  Hellenist 
ventures  to  assert  that  either  the  planning 
or  the  construction  of  Roman  buildings 
was  copied  from  the  Greek.  The  Romans 
are  said  to  have  adopted  the  Greek  orders 
and  then  to  have  spoiled  them  by  in- 
artistic alterations  and  illogical  applica- 
tions of  them  to  new  uses.  Those  who 
reason  thus  are  curiously  blind  to  the 
absurdity  of  claiming  that  forms  funda- 
mentally altered  are  mere  copies,  and  of 
charging  lack  of  originality  in  the  same 
breath  with  the  allegation  of  radical  mod- 
ifications and  entirely  novel  applications 
of  the  original  types.  The  student  of 
Roman  architecture  has  good  grounds  for 
retorting  that  in  nothing  are  the  inde- 
pendence and  creative  power  of  the 
Roman  genius  more  conclusively  dis- 
played than  in  the  use  they  made  of  their 
orders,  which  they  converted  into  vital 
constituent  elements  of  a  wholly  new, 
progressive  and  marvelously  flexible 
architectural  system.  .As  a  matter  of 
fact  the  only  order  they  borrowed  from 
the  Greeks  was  the  Ionic,  which  they 
used  but  sparingly.  The  Tuscan  was  the 
national  Etruscan  order,  in  common  use 
long  before  the  Greek  conquests  had 
familiarized  the  Romans  with  Greek 
columnar  architecture.  The  Roman 
Doric  column  was  not  derived  from 
Greece.  It  is  singular  that  the  traditional 
assertion  that  it  was  should  have  so  long 
persisted.  The  typical  Roman  "Doric" 
column  resembles  the  Greek  in  no  single 
feature,  but  is  plainly  an  elaborated  ver- 


FIG.  13.  THE  ARCH  OF  CONSTANTINE. 
ROME.  FROM  MODEL  IN  WILLARD  COLLEC- 
TION, METROPOLITAN  MUSEUM  OF  ART. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


505 


sion  of  the  national  Tuscan  column.  The 
triglyphs  and  mutules  of  the  Doric  en- 
tablature may,  however,  have  been  de- 
rived from  Greece ;  but  the  appearance  of 
triglyphs  on  the  cenotaph  of  L.  Scipio 
Barbatus,  who  died  about  290  B.  C.,  sug- 
gests the  probability  that  they  had  been 
long  known  to  the  Etruscans,  who  derived 
not  a  few  elements  of  their  architecture 
from  ancient  traditions  common  to  them 
and  to  the  Greeks.  The  Corinthian  order 
was  almost  wholly  a  Roman  creation, 
based  on  a  Greek  original,  it  is  true.  But 
the  Greek  Corinthian  was  not  a  distinct 
order ;  it  was  a  mere  variant  of  the  Ionic, 
from  which  it  differed  only  in  its  high, 
bell-shaped  and  foliated  capital.  The 
base  and  the  entablature  which  the 
Greeks  used  with  it  were  purely  Ionic. 
The  capital  had  not  been  perfected  into  a 
permanent  type  by  the  Greeks;  it  was 
the  Romans  who  gave  it  its  final  form, 
recognized  by  even  captious  critics  as  the 
most  beautiful  type  of  capital  ever  de- 
vised. The  Romans  designed  for  this 
column  a  new  and  distinctive  base,  and 
completed  the  order  by  the  invention  of 
the  modillion  cornice,  for  which  Greek 
architecture  offered  no  precedent  what- 
ever. The  modillion  comes  as  near  being 
an  outright  invention  as  any  architectural 
detail  in  the  history  of  the  art.  It  is  one 
of  the  most  brilliant  innovations  in 
history,*  and  the  Corinthian  cornice 
in  the  beauty  and  splendor  of  its  effect,  is 
the  noblest  possible  crown  for  a  building 
of  classical  design.  In  two  thousand  years 
it  would  seem  that  no  one  has  ever  de- 
signed anything  finer  for  its  purpose. 

In  their  applications  of  the  orders  the 
Romans  made  striking  innovations  upon 
the  Greek  practice,  by  which  they  vastly 
increased  the  flexibility  of  the  orders 
themselves,  and  the  range  of  architectural 
design  generally.  By  the  superposition 
of  the  orders  they  made  possible  impres- 
sive compositions  in  several  stories. 
Greek  architecture  is  almost  exclusively 
an  architecture  of  one  story.  By  the  use 
of  monolithic  shafts  of  polished  granite 
and  marble  they  produced  superb  effects 
of  chromatic  decoration  in  noble  materials 


*A.  K.  Porter  says  of  this  epoch-making  inven- 
tion :  "It  occurred  to  some  genius  to  clap  both 
dentils  and  modillions  on  the  same  entablature." 
Yes,  and  so  it  occurred  to  a  Genoese  genius  to  sail 
West  till  he  reached  America. 


without  the  use  of  perishable  paint.  By 
the  introduction  of  pedestals  they  were 
enabled  to  keep  the  parts  of  an  order  to 
a  given  scale  with  an  increased  total 
height.  They  coupled  columns  with  pil- 
asters in  their  triumphal  arches  and 
forum  walls,  making  the  pilaster  serve  as 
a  wall-respond,  and  thereby  gained 
superb  effects  of  light  and  shade  other- 
wise unattainable.  By  these  means,  all 
of  them  original  with  the  Romans,  they 
produced  an  entirely  new  architecture 
different  from  the  Greek  in  fundamental 
character,  not  merely  in  detail.  To  call 
this  architecture  a  "copying"  of  Greek 
originals  is  as  absurd  as  to  call  it  a 
"travesty"  of  Greek  forms.  The  arch- 
itecture is  neither  copied  nor  a  travesty. 
Even  the  porticoes,  in  which  the  columns 
are  used  for  the  same  purpose  as  in 
Greek  architecture,  are  as  widely  differ- 
ent from  Greek  porticoes  as  two  col- 
umnar designs  can  ever  be. 

v. 

But  the  Hellenists  and  Gothicists  who 
are  not  broadminded  enough  to  admit  the 
posibility  that  two  styles  of  architecture 
which  proceed  by  divergent  paths 
toward  diverse  ideals  are  equally  entitled 
to  respect  and  admiration,  now  ad- 
vance the  third  count  of  their  indict- 
ment. "We  will  admit,"  they  say,  "that 
the  Romans  invented  new  applications 
of  the  column  and  entablature,  but  these 
applications  are  illogical  and  artistically 
improper.  Engaged  columns  and  en- 
tablatures applied  to  walls  are  a  solecism, 
they  are  thereby  diverted  from  their 
true  structural  function  and  made  into 
mere  ornaments ;  and  of  all  these  misap- 
plications the  least  defensible  is  the 
marriage  of  the  column  and  entablature 
with  the  arch.  The  combination  of  such 
heterogeneous  forms,  belonging  to  two 
distinct  systems  of  construction,  is 
wholly  indefensible." 

This  sounds  plausible ;  it  has  been  so 
constantly  repeated,  so  dogmatically  in- 
sisted on,  that  the  most  intelligent  lay- 
man is  persuaded  it  must  be  true.  Few 
have  been  the  modern  writers  bold 
enough  to  try  to  breast  the  tide  of  hos- 
tility to  this  invention  of  the  Roman 
designers,  but  protesting  voices  have 
begun  to  make  themselves  heard,  at 


•<  OT 


H  H 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


507 


least  in  England.  Professor  F.  M.  Simp- 
son in  his  History  of  Architectural  De- 
velopment (vol.  I,  p.  Ill),  and  Sir  T.  G. 
Jackson  in  his  recent  work,  Byzantine 
and  Romanesque  Architecture  (vol.  I, 
p.  10,  11),  have  each  a  good  word  for  the 
Roman  combination  of  arch  and  column ; 
but  what  are  they,  rari  nantes  in  gurgite 
vasto,  among  so  many  of  the  contrary 
opinion?  The  predominance  of  disap- 
provalof  this  combination,  among  those 
who  write  about  architecture,  is  all  the 
more  remarkable  when  one  considers  the 
equally  strong  predominance  of  approval 
among  those  who  make  architecture.  In 
spite  of  the  critics  they  persist  in  using  it, 
as  they  have  persisted  in  doing  for  at 
least  six  hundred  years.  The  critics  meet 
this  fact  only  by  a  sweeping  accusation 
of  persistently  corrupt  taste.  The  prac- 
titioner laughs  at  the  critic  for  a  prig, 
insists  on  using  the  arcaded  order  be- 
cause it  is  useful,  convenient  and  beauti- 
ful, and  asks  what  the  critic  would  put 
in  its  place. 

The  common  objection  to  this  combin- 
ation is  that  it  is  illogical  because  it 
applies  structural  members  to  a  purely 
decorative  use;  a  "sham,"  because  the 
columns  pretend  to  support  an  entab- 
lature which  is  really  carried  by  the 
arcaded  wall  behind  them;  and  "false" 
for  both  of  the  above  reasons.  But  the 
decorative  use  of  forms  originally  struc- 
tural is  a  universal  law  of  architectural 
progress.  The  triglyphs  and  the  stone 
ceiling-panels  of  Greek  architecture, 
the  useless  flaring  capitals  of  the 
Egyptian  hypostyle  halls,  the  open-work 
gables  and  the  wall-traceries  of  the  de- 
veloped Gothic  style,  are  examples  of 
the  operation  of  this,  law  in  three  dif- 
ferent historic  styles  universally  recog- 
nized as  "truthful"  and  "sincere."  In- 
deed, there  is  little  excuse  for  the  lateral 
colonnades  of  the  Greek  temples  except 
their  splendid  decorative  value ;  the 
Roman  temple-builders  got  along  with- 
out them  in  many  cases,  and  in  others 
frankly  applied  them  as  engaged  orders 
against  the  flanks  of  the  temple.  In 
combination  with  arches  in  the  theatres, 
amphitheatres  and  basilicas,  the  engaged 
orders,  so  far  from  embodying  false- 
hood, serve  to  emphasize  as  no  other 


device  could,  the  fundamental  facts  of 
the  interior  divisions  of  the  buildings 
into  bays  and  stories,  expressing  vividly 
to  the  eye  the  lines  of  chief  stress  and 
support  in  their  construction,  and  visibly 
reenforcing  the  piers  which  resist  the 
thrusts  of  the  internal  vaulting.  The 
columns  perform  precisely  the  same 
function — a  purely  esthetic  one — as  the 
vaulting  shafts  of  Gothic  cathedrals; 
they  satisfy  the  eye  by  providing  a  visible 
support  for  what  they  appear  to  carry, 
and  what  without  such  apparent  support 
would  seem  insecure,  although  actually 
carried  in  perfect  safety  by  the  masonry 
behind  the  column  or  shaft.  Professor 
Moore,  in  his  'Development  of  Gothic 
Architecture  and  again  in  his  recent 
Medieval  Church  Architecture  in  Eng- 
land, insists  upon  the  structural  logic  of 
the  vaulting  shafts ;  but  an  analysis  of 
the  actual  stress  conditions  of  Gothic 
vaulted  churches  makes  it  clear  that  a 
corbel  would  suffice  in  their  place;  the 
shafts  are  purely  supposititious  necessi- 
ties structurally,  and  might  be  removed 
with  no  danger  to  the  edifice — which  is 
precisely  the  objection  which  the  Gothic- 
ists  allege  against  the  Roman  arcade  col- 
umns !  Architecture  on  paper  and  in 
beautifully  printed  letterpress  with  per- 
suasive illustrations  sometimes  follows 
paths  that  diverge  widely  from  the  arch- 
itecture of  real  building  and  lead  to  sur- 
prising results. 

VI. 

The  fourth  allegation  of  the  indict- 
ment, that  which  charges  the  Romans 
with  starting  architecture  on  a  fatal  path 
of  false  principles  of  design,  which  has 
been  disastrous  in  its  effect  on  modern 
architecture,  I  have  in  part  answered  in 
the  preceding  section;  that  part,  namely, 
which  relates  to  the  decorative  use  of  the 
orders  and  the  combination  of  columns 
with  arches.  But  there  are  critics  who 
impugn  the  entire  Roman  system  of 
structural  design  and  decoration  as  false. 
The  Greeks,  thev  tell  us,  and  the  medi- 
eval church  builders,  erected  honest  con- 
structions of  solid  masonry,  plainly  re- 
vealed as  such  inside  and  outside  alike. 
But  the  Romans  always,  and  for  mere 
appearance,  built  of  coarse  rubble  or 
a  species  of  concrete,  and  veneered  this 


3S 

OH  K 


. 

S  W 

II 

W  "^ 

a 


«• 
" 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


509 


coarse  and  hasty  construction  with  a 
veneer  of  stucco  and  marble,  falsifying 
the  cheap  coarseness  of  the  mass  by  a 
pretentious  apparel  of  fine  material.  This 
has  been  the  parent  of  the  whole  dismal 
succession  of  modern  shams  and  pre- 
tense, to  the  corruption  of  modern  taste 
and  the  destruction  of  honest  design. 

This,  like  all  the  other  charges,  has  a 
plausible  ring  of  superior  artistic  moral- 
ity, until  we  examine  the  facts  and  impli- 
cations behind  it.  The  fundamental  al- 
legations are  only  half  true.  The  ma- 
jority of  the  Greek  temples,  for  in- 
stance, outside  of  Attica  where  marble 
was  abundant,  were  built  of  coarse  stone 
which  was  covered  and  concealed  by  a 
coating  of  painted  stucco.  Both  the 
vaults  and  the  interior  wall  surfaces  of 
many  of  the  great  medieval  churches 
were  plastered  and  painted.  On  the  other 
hand,  in  those  regions  where  fine  build- 
ing stone  abounded,  but  where  lime  and 
pozzolana  were  scarce,  as  in  Southern 
France  and  Syria,  the  Romans  used  pure 
cut-stone  masonry  as  frankly  as  either 
the  Greek  or  the  Gothic  builders  did. 
The  implications  of  this  criticism,  more- 
over, reflect  seriously  upon  the  Creator's 
honesty.  For  in  the  noblest  of  His 
works,  the  human  form,  a  veneer  of 
precious  material — the  exquisite  color 
and  texture  of  the  skin — so  covers  the 
unpleasant  materials  and  details  of  the 
interior  construction  of  the  body -as  to 
conceal  them  wholly  from  view.  The 
beauty  of  this  masterpiece  of  design  is 
only  skin-deep. 

But  the  real  answer  to  this  criticism 
goes  beyond  these  considerations.  The 
charge  of  dishonesty  is  predicated  upon 
the  fundamentally  erroneous  assump- 
tions that  there  is  only  one  kind  of  good 
architecture  possible;  that  architecture' 
has  only  one  system  and  principle  of  de- 
sign legitimately  at  its  disposal,  and  that 
hence  if  the  Greek  (or  the  Gothic)  arch- 
itecture is  right  in  principle,  all  others 
proceeding  on  other  principles  must  be 
wrong,  and  that  a  fundamental  principle 
of  good  architecture  must  be  the  outward 
visible  display  of  the  interior  structure 
and  materials.  But  this  is  a  narrow  and 
pedantic  assumption.  Architecture  is  the 
servant  of  man,  not  his  tyrant.  The 


critic  has  no  right  to  call  upon  the  de- 
signer to  abdicate  common  sense,  to 
ignore  the  conditions  and  environment  in 
which  he  works,  to  reject  every  species 
of  beauty,  every  form  of  expression, 
which  may  be  unattainable  by  the  par- 
ticular methods  of  Greek  or  Gothic 
design.  The  purpose  of  the  architect 
must  be  to  build  beautifully,  to  meet  the 
practical  needs  of  his  time  by  such  means 
as  he  possesses  with  structures  which 
shall  be  as  beautiful,  or  as  splendid,  or 
as  majestic  as  he  can  make  them.  This 
the  Romans  did  with  extraordinary 
success,  with  daring  ingenuity,  with  mar- 
velous boldness  and  originality.  The 
vast  and  massive  vaulted  structures  they 
erected  could  not  have  been  built,  except 
in  the  rarest  instances,  of  cut  stone,  and 
the  Roman  use  of  the  abundant  local 
materials  piled  up  by  the  labor  of  soldiers 
and  slaves,  of  brick,  stone  and  rubble- 
concrete,  each  where  each  best  served  its 
purpose,  was  the  only  rational  and  only 
possible  procedure.  It  is  perfectly  legit- 
imate for  the  critics  to  declare,  to  their 
hearts'  content,  their  preference  for  the 
Greek  or  the  Gothic  type  of  design,  but 
it  is  not  valid  criticism  to  deny  the  right 
of  another  to  prefer  the  Roman,  or  at 
least  to  admire  the  Roman  achievement. 
Each  of  these  types  and  systems,  growing 
up  out  of  its  own  particular  environment 
and  conditions,  was  the  best  for  its  own 
purposes,  time  and  place.  One  has  a 
right  to  find  fault  with  the  Roman  de- 
signs, details,  composition  or  decoration, 
but  each  must  be  judged  on  its  merits, 
with  relation  to  the  purpose,  environ- 
ment and  conditions  of  the  problem. 
And  when  the  critic  wants  to  generalize 
on  a  question  like  the  aesthetic  propriety 
of  applied  decoration,  veneers  of  stucco 
and  marble,  non-structural  use  of  struc- 
tural features,  he  will  do  well  not  to 
throw  too  many  stones  at  the  Romans  lest 
they  reply  to  the  injury  of  his  own  glass 
house;  for  he  may  find  himself  obliged 
to  condemn  all  plastering,  wainscoting, 
mosaic,  tiling,  decorative  painting  and 
sculpture,  triglyphs,  paneled  ceilings, 
vaulting  shafts,  traceried  gables  and  a 
dozen  other  important  features  of  Greek, 
Byzantine  and  Gothic  architecture,  logi- 
cally liable  to  the  same  condemnation. 


23 


go 

gj5 
U< 

s« 

w 

sS 

d.  O 


I 


I/ 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


511 


VII. 

The  fifth  charge  is  an  indictment  of 
Roman  architecture  and  ornament  on  the 
score  of  its  uninspired  and  mechanical 
uniformity,  its  subjection  to  stereotyped 
rules  of  design.  Architectural  composi- 
tion became  "little  more  than  a  planting 
of  the  orders  on  all  sorts  of  buildings ;" 
the  capitals  and  mouldings  are  machine- 
made,  and  the  whole  product,  through- 
out the  whole  empire  from  first  to  last, 
"shows  a  lack  of  variation  absolutely 
without  parallel."  Obviously  such  an 
architecture  is  destitute  of  all  originality. 

The  answer  to  this  charge  is  simply  a 
flat  denial  of  every  one  of  its  contentions, 
and  an  appeal  to  the  monuments  them- 
selves. It  is  a  charge  that  might  with 
some  force  be  alleged  against  Greek  ar- 
chitecture, but  to  assert  it  of  Roman  ar- 
chitecture argues  the  author  of  the  charge 
to  be  either  densely  ignorant  or  curiously 
blind  to  the  obvious  facts.  The  evidence 
of  the  monuments  makes  the  charge  ab- 
surd. Many  readers  have  perhaps  been 
misled  by  the  loud  talk  of  two  genera- 
tions of  critics  who  have  drawn  on  their 
imaginations  for  the  facts,  and  sought 
to  make  up  by  an  abundant  sprinkling  of 
strong  adjectives  for  their  lack  of  dis- 
criminating study  of  the.  monuments.  It 
will  probably  surprise  such  readers  to 
be  told  that  the  Roman  orders  are  in- 
finitely more  varied  than  the. Greek ;  that 
Roman  ornament  disposed  of  a  far  great- 
er number  and  variety  of  motives  than 
any  that  ever  preceded  it,  and  treated 
these  motives  with  a  'flexibility  and  a 
varied  adaptation  to  position,  decorative 
function  and  material  which  even  the 
medieval  artists  hardly  surpassed.  If 
one  compares  the  Greek  temples  from 
first  to  last  with  each  other,  the  Doric 
order  is  seen  to  have  been  varied  in 
hardly  a  single  detail  for  six  hundred 
years.  The  Ionic  shows  a  greater  va- 
riety ;  but  in  Roman  architecture,  in  spite 
of  its  official  and  governmental  charac- 
ter, a  fairly  detailed  study  of  a  long  list 
of  examples  even  in  Rome  itself  fails  to 
disclose  any  two  examples  of  any  order, 
from  different  buildings,  which  are  alike. 
Compare,  for  instance,  the  Doric  orders 
of  the  Theatre  of  Marcellus,  the  Colos- 
seum, the  Basilica  Julia,  the  Tabularium 


and  the  Baths  of  Diocletian — no  two  of 
these  examples  are  alike  in  proportions, 
base,  shaft,  capital  or  entablature.     The 
Corinthian  capitals  and  entablatures  of 
the  Pantheon,  Temple  of  Castor,  Portico 
of   Octavia,   Colosseum  and  Temple   of 
Venus  and  Rome  differ  widely  from  one 
another,   showing   in   each    instance   the 
exercise    of    individual    design    and    in 
many  cases  exquisite  refinements  of  de- 
tail whose  existence  no  one  would  sus- 
pect  from   reading  the   writings   of   the 
critics.  A  cursory  examination  of  Profes- 
sor Frothingham's  fine  work  on  the  Ro- 
man arches  of  triumph  will  reveal  an  ex- 
traordinary variety  of  treatment  of  simi- 
lar programs.    While  the  Imperial  domi- 
nation asserted  itself  throughout  the  vast 
extent  of  the  empire  by  a  certain  unity 
of   spirit   which   makes   its   architectural 
products    impressively    Roman,    whether 
in  Germany  or  Southern  France,  Algiers, 
Syria,  Greece  or  Italy,  there  is  little  more 
unity  of  style  than  in  the  Romanesque 
churches  of  Western  Europe,  dominated 
as  they  were  by  the  unity  of  discipline 
and  of  program  of  the  great  monastic 
orders.     Where  the  program  was  abso- 
lutely identical,  as  in  the  amphitheatres 
and  some  of  the  temples,  there  is  a  close 
resemblance,  comparable  with  that,   for 
instance,  between  the  abbey  churches  of 
Waltham  in  England  and  Cerisy-la-foret 
in^  France,   and    the    Maison    Carree    at 
Nimes   is    thoroughly   Roman-Augustan. 
But   the    architecture    of    Baalbec     is 
widely    different    from    that    of    Rome, 
and  both  of  these  from  that  of  North 
Africa.     The  three  great  city  gates  of 
Autun,  Treves,  and  Rome  (Porta  Mag- 
giore),  the  Gate  of  Hadrian  at  Athens 
and  the  superb  triple  gateway  at  Pal- 
myra,  are  five    fundamentally   different 
designs,  unlike  in  plan,  composition,  con- 
struction and  detail.    In  Roman  plans  the 
variety  is  endless:  the  temples  show  an 
extraordinary  array  of  differing   forms 
and  arrangements,  and  hardly  two  even 
of   the  temple  porticoes   are  alike;   the 
same  is  true  of  the  baths,  basilicas,  palace 
groups,  villas  and  houses.    And  when  one 
considers  the  small  number  and  scant  va- 
riety of  the  fundamental  types  and  pro- 
.grams   of   the   Greek   and   even   of   the 
Gothic  architecture,  the   variety  of  the 


512 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


Roman  types  and  programs  and  the  in- 
genuity, inventiveness  and  resource  mani- 
fested by  their  designers  appear  little 
less  than  extraordinary. 

VIII.    THE  SUMMING  UP. 

To  those  who  have  studied  the  Roman 
contributions  to  the  art  of  architecture 
with  open  minds  and  a  sympathetic  readi- 
ness to  appreciate  what  is  valuable  in 
them — and  that  is  the  only  kind  of  study 
that  is  worth  while — the  Roman  achieve- 
ment appears  worthy  of  the  highest  ad- 
miration. Its  excellences  are  not  chiefly 
those  which  one  especially  commends  in 
Greek  architecture,  nor  is  it  to  be  judged 
by  the  same  criteria  which  one  applies 
to  Gothic  buildings.  Its  purposes,  pro- 
grams, resources,  problems  and  condi- 
tions were  alike  different  from  those  of 
the  fifth  century  B.  C.  and  those  of  the 
twelfth  and  thirteenth  centuries  A.  D., 
and  it  met  them  with  a  genius  which  in 
its  own  way  and  field  was  no  whit  in- 
ferior to  that  which  produced  the  archi- 
tecture of  either  of  those  other  periods. 
The  Greeks  in  five  centuries  produced  a 
limited  number  of  masterpieces  of  a  very 
limited  number  of  types,  one  of  which 
they  developed  to  supreme  perfection  on 
the  Athenian  Acropolis.  The  temple,  the 
stoa,  and  the  city  gate  or  propylaea, 
constitute  almost  the  whole  program  of 
Greek  architecture.  It  is  almost  exclu- 
sively a  columnar  architecture  applied  to 
buildings  of  one  story  and  of  elementary 
plan.  The  column,  wall  and  lintel  were 
the  only  structural  elements  the  Greeks 
used  or  developed.  In  this  limited  field 
they  worked  with  an  almost  unerring 
taste,  and  their  work  within  those  limits 
has  never  been  surpassed.  They  ex- 
hausted the  possibilities  of  their  pro- 
grams, but  lacked  the  inventiveness  neces- 
sary to  produce  new  programs  or  devise 
new  constructions.  They  were  confined  to 
endless  minute  variations  of  one  theme. 
In  contrast  to  this  paucity  of  invention, 
Roman  architecture  produced  an  aston- 
ishing number  of  programs — temples, 
fora,  palaces,  amphitheatres,  baths,  ba- 
silicas, gates,  colonnades,  arches  of  tri- 
umph, tombs,  administrative  buildings — 
and  an  extraordinary  variety  of  con- 
structions employing  marble,  cement,  cut- 


stone  masonry,  brick,  tufa,  granite, 
bronze,  wood  and  plaster,  the  arch, 
barrel  vault,  groined  vault,  dome,  and 
truss,  each  according  to  the  special  pro- 
gram, purpose,  materials  at  hand  and  en- 
vironment of  each  building.  The  Ro- 
mans invented  the  pedestal,  pilaster,  ar- 
chivolt,  and  modillion,  the  arcaded  order, 
the  niche.  They  were  the  first  who  ever 
conceived  and  executed  a  vast  and  lofty 
interior,  unencumbered  by  columns.  This 
surely  was  a  gift  to  the  world  of  inestim- 
able value.  The  architect  of  the  Pan- 
theon produced  a  stupendous  interior  of 
extraordinary  beauty  for  which  there 
existed  at  the  time  no  prototype  or  pre- 
vious approximation,  and  which  remains- 
unsurpassed  to  this  day,  the  most  mar- 
velous product  of  original  genius  in  con- 
struction and  design  in  the  whole  history 
of  art,  with  the  one  possible  exception 
of  Hagia  Sophia  at  Constantinople,  built 
four  centuries  later.  In  planning  the  Ro- 
mans gave  the  world  a  new  art.  In  their 
thermae  and  in  such  architectural  aggre- 
gations as  the  palaces  on  the  Palatine 
Hill,  the  forum  of  Trajan,  and  the  tem- 
ple group  at  Baalbec,  they  created  a  new 
art  of  monumental  planning,  and  taught 
the  world  how,  by  a  proper  coordination 
of  large  and  small  parts,  high  and  low 
roofs,  open  spaces  and  covered  halls,  a 
cumulative  effect  of  artistic  power  and 
beauty,  an  ordered  rhythm  and  balance, 
could  be  produced  with  apparently  heter- 
ogeneous elements.  They  originated  a 
new  art  of  civic  planning.  They  pro- 
duced new  effects  of  grandiose  scale  and 
magnificent  symmetry. 

The  defects  of  Roman  architecture  are 
chiefly  the  defects  of  its  qualities.  In 
such  vast  enterprises  as  it  was  engaged 
in,  the  minute  perfections,  the  delicate  re- 
finements and  the  figure  sculpture  of  the 
Parthenon  were  not  achieved,  for  they 
were  not  possible.  Among  all  the  vast 
array  of  buildings  erected  at  different 
times  over  the  immense  extent  of  the 
empire,  there  were,  of  course,  not  a  few 
which  merit  severe  criticism.  The  facil- 
ity of  applied  decoration  by  a  factitious 
apparel  of  architectural  members,  lent  it- 
self to  occasional  abuse.  But  the  more 
one  studies  the  monuments,  the  more 
one  is  impressed  by  the  resourcefulness 


FIG.     17.      TEMPLE     OF    JUPITER. 
BAALBEC,   SYRIA.     NORTH   WALL. 


FIG.  18.    PLAN  OF  TEMPLE  OF  THE  SUN, 
ROME.       FROM     A     FRENCH     DRAWING. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


515 


and  general  good  taste  which  mark  their 
design.  The  forms,  devices,  structural 
arrangements  and  details  of  this  archi- 
tecture were  extraordinarily  flexible  and 
adaptable  to  varying  conditions,  pro- 
grams and  purposes.  It  is  not  without 
good  reason  that  these  forms  and  devices 
are  studied  and  imitated  today.  It  was 
not  because  the  artists  of  the  fifteenth 
and  sixteenth  centuries  lacked  original 
creative  power,  and  therefore  fell  to  copy- 
ing, that  the  Renaissance  revived  Roman 
forms  and  devices — a  most  preposter- 
ous accusation,  to  which  both  Ruskin  and 
Fergusson  have  given  an  ill-merited  cur- 
rency. It  was  because  the  Renaissance 
introduced  a  new  era  in  civilization,  with 
new  requirements  which  Gothic  art  could 
no  longer  meet,  that  the  men  of  that  time 


turned  instinctively  to  Roman  models  for 
inspiration.  The  Roman  civilization  was 
in  many  of  its  aspects  nearer  to  modern 
life  than  any  other.  Greek  architecture, 
even  had  the  fifteenth  century  been 
acquainted  with  it,  was  too  narrow,  rigid 
and  limited  to  meet  the  new  demands  of 
the  modern  life.  To  this  day  the  use  of 
Greek  forms  is  restricted  to  the  narrow- 
est possible  range  of  applications,  and 
even  in  these  has  to  be  varied  in  many 
details.  The  Roman  forms  are  flexible, 
and  capable  of  endless  variation  and  ap- 
plication even  to  the  most  modern  uses, 
and  constitute  an  alphabet  of  archi- 
tectural details  and  conceptions  which 
the  world  may  not  outgrow  or  find 
useless  for  years  or  even  centuries  to 
come. 


FIG.  19. 


FRAGMENT,   FROM  THE  LATERAN  MUSEUM.     ROMAN  SYMBOLIC  AND 
CONVENTIONAL  ORNAMENT. 


TOWER  AND  MAIN  ENTRANCE-EVANS 
MUSEUM  AND  DENTAL  INSTITUTE,  UNI- 
VERSITY OF  PENNSYLVANIA,  PHILADEL- 
PHIA. JOHN  T.  WINDRIM,  ARCHITECT. 


THE    SOUTH    FRONT— EVANS   MUSEUM    AND   DENTAL   INSTITUTE,    UNIVERSITY   OF 

PENNSYLVANIA,  PHILADELPHIA. 

John   T.   Windrim,   Architect. 


TWO  DENTAL  BVILDINCS  IN 
PHILADELPHIA  AND  BOSTON 


HAROLD-D-EBERLEIN 


IN  Philadelphia  and  Boston  two  im- 
portant buildings  for  dental  pur- 
poses have  recently  been  completed, 
buildings  that  are  significant  from  both 
the  architectural  and  thoroughly  prac- 
tical points  of  view.  They  are  the 
Thomas  W.  Evans  Museum  and  Dental 
Institute  of  the  School  of  Dentistry, 
University  of  Pennsylvania,  in  Philadel- 
phia, designed  by  John  T.  Windrim,  and 
the  Forsyth  Dental  Infirmary  for  Chil- 
dren, in  Boston,  designed  by  Edward 
T.  P.  Graham. 

The  English  Collegiate  Gothic  inspira- 
tion for  the  Evans  Museum  and  Dental 
Institute  may  be  ascribed  to  the  desire 
to  preserve  a  measure  of  harmony  with 
the  dormitories  and  some  of  the  other 
newer  buildings  of  the  University  of 
Pennsylvania,  buildings  in  whose  closely 
allied  aspect  Tudor  and  early  Stuart 
characteristics  are  dominant. 


But  discussion  of  the  architectural 
aspect  must  be  reserved  for  subsequent 
paragraphs.  The  Evans  Museum  and 
Institute  is,  before  all  else,  an  emi- 
nently practical  building.  Its  practical 
side  has  been  stressed  from  first  to  last 
and  it  is  fitting,  therefore,  that  attention 
should  first  be  given  in  that  direction. 
It  is  desirable,  however,  before  going 
further,  to  say  something  of  Dr.  Evans 
and  the  bequest  by  which  the  building 
for  the  Museum  and  Institute  was  erect- 
ed. The  synopsis  of  Dr.  Evans'  personal 
history  will  explain  several  things,  among 
others  the  presence  of  his  personal  ef- 
fects, including  a  great  number  of  paint- 
ings and  a  profusion  of  objets  d'art  in 
the  museum  and  likewise  the  location  of 
the  building  at  some  distance  from  the. 
rest  of  the  University  property. 

Thomas  W.  Evans  was  born  in  Phila- 
delphia in  1823  and,  as  a  lad  lived  in  a 


518 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


house  that  stood,  until  recently  when  it 
was  razed,  on  Spruce  street  west  of  For- 
tieth on  a  part  of  the  ground  now  occu- 
pied by  the  Museum  and  Institute.  His 
fondness  for  his  boyhood  home  in  West 
Philadelphia,  or  Hamilton  Village,  as 
that  portion  of  it  was  then  called,  led 
him  to  designate  its  site  as  the  place  for 
the  dental  school  whose  foundation  was 
a  long  cherished  purpose.  At  the  age 
of  fourteen  he  "entered  the  employ  of  Jo- 
seph Warner,  a  gold  and  silver  smith  of 
Philadelphia,  whose  business  included 
the  manufacture  of  certain  surgical  in- 
struments, and  incidentally  of  plate,  sol- 
ders, and  some  of  the  implements  used 
by  dentists."  From  his  occasional  nec- 
essary contact  with  dentists  he  seems  to 
have  derived  the  impetus  that  led  him  to 
engage  in  dentistry  as  a  profession.  "In 
1841  he  became  a  student  in  the  office  of 
the  late  John  DeHaven  White,  of  Phila- 
delphia, with  whom  he  remained  for  two 
years."  While  studying  under  Dr.  White, 
he  also  pursued  a  course  at  the  Jefferson 
Medical  College,  from  which  institution, 
in  due  time,  he  graduated. 

After  practicing  in  Maryland  and, 
later,  in  Lancaster,  Pennsylvania,  where 
he  accomplished  some  remarkable  work, 
for  which,  in  recognition  of  its  novelty 
and  excellence,  the  Franklin  Institute,  in 
1847,  awarded  him  a  gold  medal,  he  was 
brought  to  the  notice  of  Dr.  C.  Starr 
Brewster,  an  American  dentist  then  prac- 
ticing in  Paris,  who  invited  him  to  enter 
into  partnership  with  him.  This  part- 
nership lasted  until  1850,  when  Dr. 
Evans  opened  an  office  independently  in 
the  Rue  de  la  Paix  and  entered  upon  a 
career  "as  wonderful  as  it  was  unique." 
A  rare  combination  of  personal  charac- 
teristics along  with  special  technical  skill 
soon  made  him  a  conspicuous  figure. 
""Dentistry  became  to  him  the  stepping- 
stone  which  served  as  a  means  of  bring- 
ing him  into  contact  with  those  to  whom 
"he  made  himself  of  value  and  who  con- 
tributed substantially  to  his  success.  He 
was  a  born  diplomat,  possessing  a  keen 
perceptive  faculty  which  enabled  him  to 
read  and  correctly  understand  human 
nature,  delicacy  and  firmness  in  his  treat- 
ment of  affairs,  a  rigid  honesty  of  pur- 
pose, and  a  foresight  which  was  intuitive. 


In  short,  he  knew  How  to  make  the  best 
of  his  opportunities,  and  in  some  degree 
create  them." 

In  time  he  came  to  number  among  his 
clientele  virtually  all  of  the  crowned 
heads  of  Europe  whom,  "by  his  skill  and 
attractive  personality,"  he  attached  to 
him  and,  at  the  same  time,  won  their  con- 
fidence, a  confidence  well-placed,  as  we 
may  judge  from  the  success  with  which 
he  conducted  a  delicate  diplomatic  mis- 
sion to  President  Lincoln,  entrusted  to 
him  by  Napoleon  III,  as  a  result  of  which 
France  remained  neutral  during  our  Civil 
War.  How  trusted  he  was  by  his  royal 
clients  may  also  be  seen  from  the  im- 
portant part  he  was  called  upon  to  play 
after  the  disaster  of  Sedan,  in  assisting 
the  Empress  Eugenie  to  escape,  an  epi- 
sode graphically  described  by  Madam  de 
Hegermann.  His  confidential  relation- 
ship to  the  Emperor  of  the  French  en- 
abled him  to  accumulate  the  greater  part 
of  his  wealth  through  judicious  real 
estate  investments  while  his  connection 
with  other  royalties  and  persons  of  note 
kept  him  in  occasional  correspondence 
with  them  and  their  friendship  and  re- 
gard are  attested  by  the  numerous  pres- 
ents of  all  sorts  they  sent,  many  of  which 
are  in  the  collection  in  the  Museum. 
After  a  life  largely  devoted  "to  works  of 
charity  and  philanthropy,"  as  well  as  to 
the  discharge  of  professional  duties,  Dr. 
Evans  died  in  Paris  in  November,  1897. 

Such,  in  brief,  is  the  story  of  a  remark- 
able man  who,  in  the  midst  of  circum- 
stances that  have  more  than  once  caused 
others  to  become  oblivious  of  country 
and  profession,  never  forgot  and  never 
allowed  others  to  forget  that  he  was,  be- 
fore all  else,  an  American  and  a  dentist. 
His  devotion  to  his  profession  was  ex- 
traordinary and  his  unselfish  ambition 
for  its  scientific  advancement  is  evi- 
denced in  his  own  words,  written  not 
long  after  the  beginning  of  his  Paris  ca- 
reer: "I  may  have  but  little  to  impart, 
yet  that  little  is  at  the  service  of  each 
and  all  members  of  my  profession ;  and 
gladly  would  I  hail  the  day  that  should 
make  all  that  is  sound  in  science  and  val- 
uable in  art  common  property.  By  the 
discussion  of  subjects  connected  with  our 
profession  and  by  the  contribution  of 


MAIN  ENTRANCE— EVANS  MUSEUM 
AND  DENTAL  INSTITUTE,  UNIVER- 
SITY OF  PENNSYLVANIA,  PHILADEL- 
PHIA. JOHN  T.  WINDRIM,  ARCHITECT. 


520 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


MAIN  STAIR  HALL— EVANS  MUSEUM  AND  DENTAL  INSTITUTE,  UNIVERSITY  OF 

PENNSYLVANIA,  PHILADELPHIA. 

John  T.   Windrim,  Architect. 


each  according  to  his  ability.  ...  we 
shall  better  serve  the  generation  in  which 
we  live."  When  the  time  came  to  provide 
generously  for  the  foundation  of  an  in- 
stitution designed  to  promote  the  inter- 
ests of  the  science  of  dentistry,  it  is  not 
surprising  that  a  man,  actuated  by  the 
sentiments  just  alluded  to  and  amply 
blessed  with  both  wealth  and  influence, 
should  lay  plans  largely,  "according  to 
his  ability."  This  he  did  for  the  build- 
ing and  equipment,  exclusive  of  the  site, 
which  itself  is  exceedingly  valuable,  have 
cost  more  than  $900,000  and  no  expense 
has  been  spared  to  make  it  the  most  com- 
plete institution  of  its  kind  in  the  world. 
Thanks  to  judicious  and  well-calcu- 
lated planning  and  the  most  painstaking 
care  bestowed  upon  all  practical  details, 
it  is  safe  to  say  that  the  Evans  Museum 
and  Dental  Institute,  in  facilities  for  op- 
eration and  thoroughness  of  appoint- 
ments, has  no  superior  and  few,  if  any, 
equals.  By  long  experience  of  a  wide 
practice,  dealing  to  a  great  extent  with 
comprehensive  undertakings  that  require 
special  consideration  for  points  of  prac- 
tical efficiency,  Mr.  Windrim  was  emi- 


nently well  fitted  to  cope  successfully 
with  any  problems  in  this  field  that  might 
present  themselves.  Not  only  was  the 
museum  to  be  housed  and  adequate  ac- 
commodations provided  for  the  School 
of  Dentistry,  which  at  the  present  time 
consists  of  a  teaching  staff  of  83  profes- 
sors and  instructors  and  665  students, 
but  allowance  had  also  to  be  made  for 
the  clinical  treatment  of  free  dispensary 
patients,  of  whom  there  are  about 
40,000  a  year.  Besides  this,  there 
were  several  other  important  considera- 
tions to  be  taken  into  account.  Ease  of 
ingress  and  egress  and  facility  of  com- 
munication between  the  several  parts  of 
the  building,  without  congestion  or  con- 
fusion at  any  point  in  the  corridors,  had 
to  be  assured  and,  furthermore,  due  al- 
lowance had  to  be  made  for  future 
growth,  contemplating  an  appreciable  in- 
crease both  in  the  number  of  students 
and  in  the  number  of  free  dispensary  pa- 
tients frequenting  the  clinics. 

After  the  conclusion  of  vexatious  liti- 
gation, in  the  course  of  which  the  avail- 
ability of  at  least  a  portion  of  Dr.  Evans's 
bequest  was  assured  for  fulfillment  of 


f 


<  W 

H  H  PL< 

w  a 

<  w  tn 

a  Q  o 


522 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD.- 


the  purpose  to  which  he  had  designed  it, 
ground  was  broken  for  the  building  in 
September,  1912,  and  the  cornerstone 
was  laid  in  May,  1913.  Immediately 
after  the  dedication  ceremonies  on  Feb- 
ruary 22,  1915,  the  School  of  Dentistry 
moved  into  its  new  quarters.  The  struc- 
ture, of  hard-burned  brick  with  Indiana 
limestone  and  terra-cotta  trimmings,  is 
in  the  form  of  the  letter  H  and  displays 
an  unbroken  frontage  of  242  feet  along 
Spruce  street,  while  in  depth  it  extends 
for  161  feet  on  Fortieth  street.  There  is 
a  spacious  basement  and,  above  it,  the 
ground,  second  and  third  floors  are  lofty 
and  exceptionally  well  lighted.  In  the 
basement,  to  which  the  principal  ap- 
proach is  by  a  stair  descending  a  short 
way  from  the  main  entrance  on  Spruce 
street,  are  large  locker  rooms  and  lava- 
tories for  the  students,  a  commodious 
dining-room  for  the  students  and,  adja- 
cent to  it,  a  fully  equipped  kitchen,  a  sep- 
arate dining-room  for  the  faculty,  labor- 
atories for  modelling,  plaster  casting, 
moulding,  soldering,  swaging  and  metal- 
lurgical work,  shops  for  polishing  and 
grinding,  such  lecture  rooms  as  may  be 
necessary  in  immediate  proximity  to  the 
shops  and  laboratories  and  store  rooms 
for  supplies  and  apparatus. 

While  a  close  examination  of  the  floor 
plans  reveals  the  convenience  and  thor- 
oughness of  the  provision  for  all  practi- 
cal requirements  in  the  daily  use  of  the 
building,  it  does  not  reveal  the  punctilious 
care  bestowed  to  ensure  good  lighting, 
perfect  cleanliness  and  ease  of  maintain- 
ing thoroughly  sanitary  conditions,  all  of 
them  features  of  more  than  ordinary  im- 
portance in  a  building  of  the  sort  under 
investigation.  The  structure  stands  on 
a  slope  so  that  a  large  portion  of  the 
western  end  is  above  ground  and  receives 
ample  light  from  large  windows.  In  the 
other  parts  of  the  basement,  the  windows 
open  into  wide  area  ways  lined  with 
white  glazed  brick  so  that  the  interior 
receives  the  maximum  possible  light  both 
direct  and  reflected.  In  connection  with 
the  question  of  lighting,  it  is  especially 
worthy  of  note  that  the  walls  throughout 
have  been  painted  either  grey  or  a  light 
sage  green  to  avoid  the  trying  effects  of 
eye  fatigue  due  to  staring  white  walls. 


This  system  of  wall  coloring  has  been 
consistently  carried  out  through  the  en- 
tire building  and  emphatically  marks  the 
modern  revulsion  from  the  long-accepted 
convention  that  made  the  walls  of  hos- 
pitals, and  all  other  buildings  where 
stress  was  laid  upon  sanitary  considera- 
tions, an  uncompromising  white  or  cream 
color.  Spotless  white  may  be  all  well 
enough  as  an  infallible  betrayer  of  dirt 
and  incentive  to  scrupulous  cleanliness, 
but  the  present  generation  has  surely 
been  sufficiently  impressed  with  the  para- 
mount necessity  for  sanitary  precaution 
to  be  allowed  to  pay  some  regard  to  the 
comfort  of  the  eye  instead  of  perpetually 
scrutinizing  every  square  inch  of  wall 
surface  for  visible  evidence  of  sanitary 
laxity  at  the  cost  of  inevitable  strain  and 
weariness  to  the  optic  nerve. 

The  scheme  of  restful  green  paint 
has  been  carried  out  with  reference  to 
all  the  metal  furniture  and  equipments — 
cabinets,  lockers,  operating  chairs,  tables 
and  the  like — which  are  finished  in  tones 
ranging  from  sage  to  olive  and  are  of  the 
most  approved  pattern,  embodying  the 
latest  improvements  in  every  particular. 

The  floors  are  paved  with  composition 
flooring  and  all  the  angles  at  junctions  of 
floors  and  walls  are  coved  so  that  there 
are  no  unsanitary  corners.  Care  in  this 
particular  has  even  been  extended  to 
the  doors  and  door  trims.  The  doors  are 
made  without  panels  and  show  a  perfect- 
ly smooth  surface  of  dull  finished  wood 
on  both  sides.  The  door  trims  are  made 
without  mouldings  and  are  merely  bev- 
elled. Incidentally,  while  meeting  sani- 
tary requirements,  a  pleasing  architec- 
tural effect  has  been  achieved. 

On  the  ground  floor,  the  east  wing,  to 
the  right  of  the  entrance,  is  devoted  to 
the  museum,  while  the  west  wing  con- 
tains the  general  office,  the  board  room, 
the  dean's  office,  the  general  waiting 
room  for  dispensary  and  clinic  patients 
and  the  extracting  room.  By  a  commend- 
able arrangement,  free  patients  applying 
for  clinical  treatment  are  received  and 
registered  in  the  general  office,  immedi- 
ately to  the  left  of  the  entrance.  Thence 
they  are  sent  to  the  waiting  room  direct- 
ly across  the  corridor.  From  there  they 
may  be  taken  to  the  examination  room 


MAIN  STAIR  HALL— EVANS  MUSEUM 
AND  DENTAL  INSTITUTE,  UNIVER- 
SITY OF  PENNSYLVANIA,  PHILADEL- 
PHIA. JOHN  T.  WINDRIM,  ARCHITECT. 


524 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


ENTRANCE    LOBBY-EVANS   MUSEUM    AND   DENTAL  INSTITUTE,   UNIVERSITY   OF 

PENNSYLVANIA,  PHILADELPHIA. 

John  T.   Windrim,  Architect. 


nearby,  where  a  record  is  made  of  their 
case,  or  else,  if  they  have  been  examined 
at  a  previous  visit,  they  receive  their  card 
at  the  record  desk  and  are  distributed  to 
whichever  one  of  the  clinics,  on  this  floor 
or  the  floor  above,  may  be  their  destina- 
tion. As  the  clinics  or  other  rooms 
which  patients  may  have  occasion  to 
visit  are  all  ranged  about  the  main  hall 
on  the  ground  floor,  or  at  the  head  of  the 
stairs  on  the  floor  above,  the  circulation 
of  an  outside  element  is  confined  to  one 
portion  of  the  building.  The  building  is 
so  planned  also  that  the  students  of  one 
class,  passing  to  and  fro,  will  not  come  in 
contact  with  the  students  of  other  classes. 
Everything,  in  fact,  has  been  done  to  fa- 
cilitate the  orderly  operation  of  the  build- 
ing, a  momentous  consideration  where 
the  frequent  and  convenient  circulation 
of  so  large  a  number  of  people  must  be 
reckoned  upon.  Special  mention  should 
be  made  of  the  operative  clinic,  a  view 
of  which  is  shown  in  one  of  the  accom- 


panying illustrations.  This  room  con- 
tains one  hundred  and  thirty-four  oper- 
ating chairs  with  ample  space  for  all  the 
accessories  pertaining  to  each  and  the 
supply  and  record  offices  are  adjacent.  A 
flood  of  light  is  thrown  directly  into  the 
mouths  of  the  patients  by  a  range  of 
broad  and  high  windows  which  are  car- 
ried up  into  and  form  a  part  of  the  roof 
slope.  In  fact,  ^s  may  be  seen,  nearly 
the  whole  north  side  of  the  room  is  of 
glass.  On  the  same  floor,  the  library  in 
the  tower,  immediately  above  the  en- 
trance, and  the  main  lecture  hall,  in  the 
east  wing  over  the  museum,  are  conveni- 
ently accessible.  A  detailed  scrutiny  of 
the  plans  of  all  the  floors  shows  ample 
provision  for  every  facility  for  under- 
graduate study  and  clinical  work  and 
for  post-graduate  research. 

So  much  for  the  purely  practical  side 
of  the  building.  How  any  institution 
could  be  more  complete  in  its  appoint- 
ments or  more  thoroughly  meet  all 


S  fii  j  H 


W  H  W 
>  ^  fc 

Pg^ 

<  «  o 

ga^ 

S^fc: 

O  •<  en 


526 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


utilitarian  requirements  for  its  highly 
specialized  purposes,  it  would  be  difficult 
to  conceive.  For  this  thoroughness  and 
foresight  alone,  which  necessarily  en- 
tailed a  far  reaching  study  of  the  in- 
numerable details  and  the  conditions  ex- 
isting or  likely  to  arise  in  connection  with 
the  operation  of  so  large  a  building,  the 
highest  credit  is  due  and  cause  one  to 
hesitate  before  calling  attention  to  cer- 
tain shortcomings  on  other  scores. 

The  structure  is  impressive  in  the  dis- 
position of  its  masses  and  the  general 
aspect  is  decidedly  agreeable  but  one  is 
forced  to  admit,  unwillingly  in  the  face 
of  so  much  laudable  excellence  in  a 
practical  way,  that  there  are  some  dis- 
appointments when  the  examination  is 
based  solely  upon  an  architectural  point 
of  view.  It  is  true,  the  disappointments 
are  chiefly  to  be  found  in  small  features 
and  details  but  it  must  be  remembered 
that  it  is  the  little  things,  the  humble 
details  that,  after  all,  make  or  mar  our 
pleasure  in  the  contemplation  of  any 
piece  of  architectural  achievement,  large 
or  small.  One  of  the  factors  that  con- 
tributed so  largely  to  the  pleasure  of  the 
public  in  witnessing  Mr.  Mansfield's  pro- 
ductions was  the  scrupulous  and  exacting 
care  he  always  bestowed  upon  the  min- 
utest details  of  costume  and  stage  set- 
ting, that  they  should  be  absolutely  right 
historically  and  archaeologically  as  well 
as  artistically.  Consequently  his  presen- 
tations were  past  criticism  in  that  re- 
spect. Mr.  Mansfield's  solicitude  for 
little  things  was  proverbial,  for  he  well 
knew  their  value  and  importance  in  the 
aggiegate  for  creating  tone  and  giving 
pleasure,  whether  or  not  individuals  in 
the  audience  might  be  sufficiently  dis- 
criminating to  analyze  correctly  the  ele- 
ments of  their  enjoyment.  It  is  pre- 
cisely the  same  in  architecture ;  the  little 
things  count  in  the  measure  of  our  ap- 
preciation far  more  than  most  people 
realize.  Mass,  construction,  proportion 
and  plan  are  most  important.  The  big 
things  must  be  right,  but  the  details  must 
be  right,  too,  and  if  they  are  not  it  is 
hardly  to  be  expected  that  people  of  dis- 
criminating taste  will  derive  lasting  pleas- 
ure and  saisfaction  from  contemplating 
the  result.  It  is  not  necessary  that  the 


liberty  of  invention  or  originality  be 
hampered  by  a  narrow,  hidebound  stick- 
ling for  academic  exactitudes — that 
would  be  mere  archaeology — but  there 
are  certain  fundamental  amenities  of  pro- 
portion, of  the  use  of  materials  and  of 
the  contrivance  and  placing  of  orna- 
mental detail,  the  observance  of  which 
in  any  structure  seems  requisite  to  sin- 
cere enjoyment  on  the  part  of  the  ob- 
server. 

In  color  effect,  the  Evans  Museum 
and  Dental  Institute  is  exceptionally 
pleasing.  The  body  of  the  building  is 
constructed  of  a  hard-burned  red  brick, 
irregularly  blotched  with  deeper  tones 
verging  from  purple  to  black.  The 
courses  are  laid  in  Flemish  bond  and  the 
surface  of  the  brick  is  rough  enough,  to- 
gether with  the  veining  of  the  mortar 
joints,  to  impart  a  highly  agreeable  tex- 
ture to  the  walls.  The  desirable  note  of 
contrast  comes  in  the  Indiana  limestone 
door  and  window  trims,  coping,  string 
courses  and  quoins.  As  to  its  proportions, 
the  building  has  a  substantial  and  dig- 
nified mien  without  being  in  the  least 
stolid  or  heavy.  The  composition  is  good 
and  the  balance  of  the  south  front  com- 
mendable, although  one  could  wish  that 
circumstances  might  have  permitted  a 
structure  of  slightly  less  height.  Had 
such  been  the  case  it  would  have  been 
possible  to  achieve  a  result  of  greater 
interest  in  the  particular  style  of  archi- 
tecture chosen,  a  style  which  lends  itself 
with  peculiar  readiness  to  felicitous  ex- 
pression in  long  ranges  of  comparatively 
low  buildings.  Witness  many  of  the  low- 
lying  collegiate  buildings  in  England  and 
some  of  the  more  recent  work  at  Prince- 
ton and  in  several  other  places  in  our  own 
country. 

If  the  limits  of  a  city  site  and  the  re- 
quirements of  certain  space  within  had 
not  imposed  definite  conditions  that  had 
to  be  met,  it  would  doubtless  have  been 
possible  to  give  the  tower  more  domi- 
nating emphasis.  As  it  is,  nevertheless, 
the  tower  is  exceedingly  impressive.  In 
fact,  the  whole  structure,  whether  seen 
from  a  distance  or  viewed  at  close  range, 
is  striking  and  has  so  many  good  qual- 
ities that  one  is  all  the  more  disappointed 
on  finding  some  of  the  shortcomings  re- 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


527 


First   Floor 


EVANS  MUSEUM 
AND  DENTAL  IN- 
STITUTE. JOHN  T. 
W  I  N  D  R  I  M, 
ARCHITECT. 


Second  Floor. 


ENTRANCE  »  TO  CLINIC— FORSYTH  DEN- 
TAL INFIRMARY  FOR  CHILDREN,  BOSTON. 
EDWARD  T.  P.  GRAHAM,  ARCHITECT. 


BRONZE  DOORS  OF  CLINIC  ENTRANCE-FOR- 
SYTH  DENTAL  INFIRMARY  FOR  CHILDREN, 
BOSTON.  EDWARD  T.  P.  GRAHAM,  ARCHITECT. 


530 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


MAIN   ENTRANCE— FORSYTH  DENTAL  INFIRMARY   FOR  CHILDREN,   BOSTON. 
Edward  T.  P.  Graham,  Architect. 


vealed  by  a  more  intimate  inspection. 
The  principal  entrance  is  through  an  im- 
posing portal  which  leads  one  to  expect 
much  but  unfortunately  the  sense  of  pro- 
portion and  architectural  fitness  is  sadly 
jarred  by  finding  a  jejune  and  insignifi- 
cant vestibule  that  does  not  bear  out  the 
promise  of  the  exterior.  It  seems  almost 
as  though  exterior  and  interior  had  been 
designed  by  different  hands  working  in- 
dependently to  interpret  wholly  diverse 
conceptions. 

A  similar  lack  of  architectural  co- 
herence is  apparent  elsewhere,  for  in  a 
number  of  instances  the  interior  does  not 
sufficiently  reflect  the  mode  of  expression 
one  is  led  to  expect  by  the  aspect  of  the 
exterior.  Greater  harmony  of  style  could 
have  been  preserved  without  doing  vio- 
lence to  any  essential  requirement  de- 
manded by  utilitarian  considerations  or 
practical  expediency.  The  museum  of- 
fers a  case  to  point  this  criticism.  The 
tall  quadrangular  columns  and  the  plain, 
crash  covered  walls  assuredly  do  not  echo 
the  exterior.  Here  was  an  opportunity 


missed  to  create  a  panelled  interior  with 
excellent  effect,  an  interior  that  would 
have  been  altogether  in  keeping  with  the 
architectural  promise  given  without  and, 
at  the  same  time,  quite  as  suitable  for  the 
display  of  the  exhibits. 

The  great  hall  on  the  second  floor  and 
the  library  are  really  the  only  portions 
of  the  interior  where  one  finds  the  ex- 
pected conformity  with  the  external 
aspect.  In  the  hall  there  was  a  fine  op- 
portunity for  an  open  timber  roof,  but 
what  should  have  been  open  timber  has 
been  metamorphosed  into  steel  and 
plaster,  and  cast  metal  can  never  have  the 
fluidity  of  line  and  spontaneity  of  carved 
wood.  Nevertheless,  the  general  effect  is 
agreeable  and  would  have  been  more  so 
had  more  vigorous,  though  harmonious, 
coloring  been  employed,  such  as  was 
customary  in  English  roofs  of  the  period 
reproduced,  instead  of  the  somewhat 
evanescent  hues  suggestive  of  a  later 
Continental  inspiration.  The  travertine- 
faced  walls  of  the  great  hall  are  excep- 
tionally pleasant.  One  queries,  however, 


532 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


BRONZE    PANELS-FORSYTH    DENTAL    INFIR- 
MARY  FOR   CHILDREN.    BOSTON. 
Edward  T.  P.  Graham,  Architect. 

the  appropriateness  of  putting  heavy 
dripstones  over  inside  doorways.  It  is 
surely  not  logical  to  do  so  and  architec- 
tural ornament  ought  to  have  some  sub- 
stantial raison  d'etre,  for  it  will  almost 
invariably  be  found  that  the  sundry 
forms  of  architectural  ornament,  at  least 
the  quasi-structural  forms,  had  their 
origin  in  practical  utility. 

Great  admiration  is  due  the  capable 
treatment  accorded  the  Evans  Museum 
and  Dental  Institute  in  respect  of  its 
comprehensive  plan,  which  adequately 
meets  the  manifold  demands  made  upon 
it,  and  commendation  is  due  the  com- 
position of  the  toute  ensemble  for,  de- 
spite the  unfulfilled  desiderata  to  which 
attention  has  been  directed,  the  building 
presents  an  imposing  appearance  and 
bears  a  stamp  of  distinction  which  can- 
not fail  to  redound  to  the  credit  of  the 
University  of  whose  buildings  it  now 
forms  an  important  unit. 


The  Forsyth  Dental  Infirmary  for 
Children,  on  the  Fenway  in  Boston,  de- 
signed by  Edward  T.  P.  Graham,  is  the 
second  building  claiming  attention  in 
this  article.  An  inspection  of  its  plans 
reveals  a  complete  and  convenient  ar- 
rangement in  basement  and  on  the  first 
and  second  floors.  In  the  basement  are 
quarters  for  the  permanent  staff,  the 
children's  waiting  room,  the  visiting  den- 
tists' room  and  sundry  smaller  offices.  So 
much  of  the  basement  is  well  above  the 
level  of  the  ground  that  there  is  abund- 
ance of  light,  quite  as  much  as  many 
buildings,  more  closely  hemmed  in  by 
other  structures,  would  have  on  the 
ground  floor.  The  first  floor  contains  an 
operating  theatre,  a  large  museum  and 
research  room,  a  lecture  room  and  the 
necessary  reception  and  waiting  rooms 
and  small  offices  for  various  purposes. 
The  second  floor  is  almost  wholly  oc- 
cupied by  the  infirmary. 

A  survey  of  the  exterior  brings  with 
it  a  sense  of  satisfaction.  There  is  a 
finish  and  completeness  in  its  aspect  that 
cannot  be  other  than  gratifying  and  the 
observer  feels  at  once  that  it  is  a  worthy 
and  representative  addition  to  the  series 
of  buildings  being  systematically  erected, 
according  to  a  well  conceived  and  co- 
herent civic  plan,  along  the  Fenway  in 
Boston,  a  comprehensive  building  project 
that  does  credit  to  public  foresight  and 
public  spirit  in  that  community  and  bids 
fair,  in  a  few  years,  to  transform  what 
was  formerly  an  unsightly  waste  into  an 
exceptionally  beautiful  parkway. 

The  proportions  of  the  building  are 
singularly  agreeable  and  the  just  balance 
between  mass  and  detail  is  carefully  pre- 
served. The  large  amount  of  window 
space  required  in  the  walls  of  the  upper 
story,  to  supply  adequate  light  in  the  in- 
firmary, is  balanced  by  the  strong  corners 
and  the  procession  of  Ionic  capped  pilas- 
ters separating  the  windows  on  each  side. 
The  massive  treatment  of  the  basement 
and  first  floor  walls  affords  a  suitable 
support  for  the  colonnaded  treatment  of 
the  upper  story.  The  composition,  re- 
garded as  a  whole,  presents  a  happy  com- 
bination of  classic  austerity  and  Renais- 
sance geniality  and  the  exquisitely 
wrought  detail  that  occurs  now  and  again 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL  'RECORD. 


533 


GROUND  FLOOR  PLANS-FORSYTH  DENTAL  INFIRMARY  FOR  CHILDREN. 
Edward  T.  P.  Graham,  Architect. 


BASEMENT  PLANS-FORSYTH  DENTAL  INFIRMARY  FOR  CHILDREN. 
Edward  T.  P.  Graham,  Architect. 


534 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


PANELS   ON    DOORS   OF   CHILDREN'S    ENTRANCE-FORSYTH    DENTAL   INFIRMARY 

FOR  CHILDREN.  BOSTON. 
Edward  T.  P.  Graham,  Architect. 


nt  different  points  of  the  building  im- 
presses one  that  the  conception,  while 
strong,  is  urbane  rather  than  severe. 

Where  a  bit  of  pleasantry  or  playful- 
ness can  be  consistently  introduced  with- 
out derogating  from  the  dignity  of  an 
architectural  composition  it  always  af- 
fords a  desirable  feature  and  lends  a  cer- 
tain unique  character.  Such  a  charming 
bit  of  playfulness  we  .find  successfully  in- 
troduced in  the  exquisitely  wrought 
panels  of  the  bronze  doors  of  the  chil- 
dren's entrance,  executed  by  Roger  Burn- 
ham,  where  scenes  from  "Alice  in  Won- 
derland" and  "Uncle  Remus"  are  de- 
picted in  a  way  to  attract  and  delight  the 
unfortunate  little  patients  who  cross  the 
threshold. 

One  can  readily  imagine  that  the 
feelings  with  which  the  young  suf- 
ferers enter  the  building  are  not  the  most 
happy  in  the  world  and  it  is  surely  very 
appropriate  to  place  anything  before  their 


eyes  that  may  serve  to  divert  them  from 
thoughts  of  their  discomfort  and  cheer 
them.  If  anything  can  do  it,  the  grin  of 
the  Cheshire  Cat  and  the  attitudes  of 
Brer  B'ar  and  Brer  Rabbit  will. 

The  stone  carving  at  various  points  of 
the  exterior  and  the  refinement  of  the 
modelling  displayed  on  the  other  doors, 
shown  in  the  illustrations,  speak  suffi- 
ciently for  themselves  without  comment. 
On  regarding  the  building  carefully  one 
can  truly  say  that  it  is  wholly  fit  for  its 
intended  purposes,  judged  from  a  purely 
practical  and  utilitarian  point  of  view  and 
that  in  its  architectural  aspect  it  measures 
up  to  high  standards.  Its  conformity  to 
academic  conventions  has  not  impaired 
the  vigor  and  originality  of  individual 
expression.  The  comparison  of  both 
buildings  and  their  several  points  of  ex- 
cellence forms  an  instructive  chapter  in 
the  study  of  recent  architectural  perform- 
ances. 


Certain  Phafes 
Sanish  CoIohiaT 


AT  the  beginning  of  the  present  cen- 
tury it  was  said,  and  with  good  rea- 
son, that  Spanish  architecture  had, 
even  then,  exerted  a  notable  degree  of  in- 
fluence upon  the  principles  of  design  and 
of  ornament  as  applied  to  building  in  the 
United  States ;  that  the  Mission  Archi- 
tecture of  California  had  proved  to  be, 
most  happily,  a  source,  as  it  were,  of 
true  inspiration ;  and  that  our  architects 
who  resorted  to  this  source  of  inspira- 
tion had  produced  excellent  work  in  the 
Western  States. 

Those  observers  who  had  studied  in 
Spain  and  Latin  America  noticed  the 
extension  to  all  parts  of  this  country  of 
principles  of  construction  derived,  either 
remotely  or  immediately,  from  the  Iber- 
ian Peninsula,  and  suggested,  naturally, 
that  one  of  the  results  of  such  events  as 
our  wars  in  Cuba  and  the  Philippines 
would  be  to  make  the  study  of  Spanish- 
Colonial  architecture  of  particular  in- 
terest in  the  future. 

Now  .we  are  in  the  midst  of  that 
future :  now,  looking  back,  mindful  of 
superb  though  very  new  examples  of 
Spanish  Free  Renaissance  buildings 
that  to-day  may  be  seen  in  Washington 
and  at  several  other  points  in  the  East- 
ern States,  we  are  fairly  obliged  to  notice 
a  growing  tendency  during  the  last  dec- 
ade in  the  United  States  to  accord  to 
Spanish-Colonial  architecture  at  least  its 
due  share  of  influence. 

I  gladly  leave  to  others  the  privilege 
of  comment  upon  those  tendencies  which, 
at  home,  are  manifesting  themselves  in 
the  fashion  of  adapting  such  a  well-de- 
rived foreign  style  to  our  own  needs  and 
practices.  My  purpose  is,  in  this  brief 
study,  to  indicate  tendencies  that  have 
run  their  course  in  two  great  and  ancient 
centres  of  Hispanic  culture  in  the  West- 


ern Hemisphere — Peru  and  Mexico;  and 
it  seems  convenient  to  begin  with  ob- 
servations actually  made  in  the  famous 
Torretagle  house  in  Lima,  July  7,  1906. 

This  house,  confronting  the  Casa  de 
Ejercicios  del  Sagrado  Corazon  is 
said,  and  I  think  truly,  to  be  the 
only  fine  private  dwelling  in  the  Peruvian 
capital  that  still  preserves  its  original 
form.  It  may  be  regarded  as  typical  of 
the  house  of  the  old  West  Coast  aristoc- 
racy at  the  beginning  of  the  eighteenth 
century.  There  is  much  carved  wood  on 
balconies,  ceilings,  shutters  of  the  win- 
dows ;  and  certainly  the  effect  produced 
by  this  ornamentation,  overemphasizing 
details  to  which  it  is  applied,  is  striking, 
literally :  it  challenges  attention  when  one 
first  sees  the  facade  or  passes  from  the 
street  into  the  large  patio.  But  the  de- 
tails are  insubordinate :  therefore  all 
those  agreeable  intimations  of  serenity 
with  stability  which  a  noble  old  mansion 
should  convey  are  lost. 

This  is  not,  one  reflects,  a  beautiful 
house — not  really  to  be  ranked  with  fine 
old  Italian  and  English  houses.  Well, 
why  should  we  expect  to  discover  good 
art  in  these  West  Coast  countries  ?  Their 
conquest  was  effected  by  rough  soldiers. 
Architects,  painters,  sculptors  did  not 
usually  join  the  bands  of  the  conquista- 
dores ;  and  it  seems  quite  clear  that  even 
at  a  later  period  they  neglected  to  come 
out  in  sufficient  numbers  to  make  their 
presence  felt  in  the  direction  and  control 
of  public  taste,  for  there  is  little  or  no 
evidence  of  innate  sense  of  form  and 
line,  or  even  of  very  high  ideals,  in  the 
works  of  art  one  is  apt  to  see  at  first, 
although  elaborate  proof  is  at  hand  of 
the  artisans'  demonstrated  skill  in  han- 
dling wood  (Fig.  1)  and  stone.  And 
again,  what  kind  of  artistic  propositions 


536 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


should  we  expect  from  the  people  of 
mixed  blood — the  Indigenes  having  been 
content 'before  the  conquest  to  produce 
in  all  the  arts  such  things  as  to  us  appear 
to  be  nearly  devoid  of  beauty? 

Reply  to  such  questions  and  objections 
as  these  I  sought  faithfully  though  critic- 
ally in  the  course  of  long  journeys  into 
many  parts  of  .Latin  America.  Gradually 
it  became  evident  to  me  that  the  natives 
had  shown  an  almost  marvelous  degree 
of  patience  (patience  rather  than  the 
quest  of  beauty  having  been  their  ideal) 
and  of  manual  dexterity  in  the  execution 
of  such  works  as  their  European  masters 
had  been  able  to  plan.  Moreover,  these 
masters,  being  masters  also  of  the  enor- 
mous treasure  of  the  land,  were  actually 
enabled  to  secure  from  time  to  time  the 
services  of  a  few  competent  architects: 
in  this  respect  one's  first  impression  un- 
dergoes decided  revision  as  the  field  of 
study  becomes  wider. 

At  the  Recoleta — inviolate  home  of  the 
Franciscan  Order  in  the  outskirts  of 
Cuzco — we  read,  as  it  were,  an  early 
chapter  of  the  same  story.  Here  is  the 
Franciscan  severe  interpretation  of  the 
art  of  the  mother  country  in  the  sixteenth 
and  seventeenth  centuries:  "Toribio  de 
Fustamente,  fundador  de  esta  santa  casa" 
— thus  runs  the  inscription  on  the 
founder's  portrait — "murio  el  ano  1619. 
Esta  enterado  junto  al  altar  major  de  este 
convento,  que  acabo  ano  1601."  He  . 
finished  it  indeed  in  the  year  1601.  Its 
design  undoubtedly  has  been  modified, 
yet  without  inharmonious  changes,  in 
later  years — although  the  clock  I  asked 
the  Cuzco  student,  my  assistant  that  day, 
to  photograph  (the  clock  in  the  wall, 
beside  the  precious  old  shrine),  was 
placed  right  there,  the  Cuzco  student  as- 
sured me,  in  that  very  same  wall,  at  the 
beginning,  when  it  had  but  one  hand,  and 
there  has  remained  since  the  convent's 
foundation!  (Fig.  2  shows  the  shrine, 
the  pictorial  value  of  which  is,  I  think, 
enhanced  by  omission  of  the  ancient 
clock-face.) 

Gentlest  feature  perhaps  of  all  is  the 
patio  (Fig.  3),  the  arches  of  which  are 
seen  above  or  through  foliage  of  retama, 
floripondio,  sauce,  pino,  pino  chileno, 
nucau,  durazno,  capuli,  rosas  con  flares 


diferentes,  fuchsia,  and  cedroncillo;  this 
being  a  true  list  of  plants  in  the  irrigated 
undated  garden — charmingly  artistic  gar- 
den of  an  arid  skyland — the  garden  of  the 
convent's  patio  or  inner  court.  Much 
cheerful  talk  there  was,  I  remember, 
with  Rev.  Franciscan  Father  Jose  Grego- 
rio  Castro  and  his  associates  while  we 
walked  about  in  every  part  of  the  build- 
ing, surveying  the  Recoleta's  art  treas- 
ures—which generally  represent  death, 
and  extreme  suffering  either  before  or 
after  death. 

And  this  Recoleta  may  stand  for  the 
Peruvian  phase,  barely  suggested  in  such 
a  brief  note,  of  the  Franciscan  structures 
about  which  there  will  be  more  to  say 
when  we  come  to  Mexico. 

But  before  coming  to  Mexico  we  must 
speak  of  the  most  characteristic  Peruvian 
phase,  as  follows : 

The  city  which,  more  than  any  other 
West  Coast  city,  should  be  regarded  as  a 
home  of  culture  in  general,  and  therefore 
specifically  a  centre  from  which  control 
and  direction  of  the  fine  arts  has  pro- 
ceeded, is  the  interesting  place  called  on 
the  maps  Arequipa.  The  Peruvian 
"Tarrytown,"  we  may  call  it,  since  the 
name  Arequipa  signifies  in  the  Indian 
tongue,  "Yes,  rest  here."  But  orderly 
processes  of  architectural  development 
were  rendered  impossible  in  Arequipa, 
even  more  infeasible  there  than  in  other 
populous  cities,  mountain-built  or  on  the 
Andean  littoral.  Repeated  and  very  vio- 
lent earthquake  shocks  forbade  such  edi- 
fices as  would  have  been  stable  enough  in 
other  lands  to  "rest  here" — or  there  or, 
in  security,  anywhere  near  the  geosyn- 
clinal  that  follows  the  Andean  coast  line. 
The  cathedral  at  Arequipa,  formerly 
more  imposing  than  it  is  at  present, 
is.  built  of  volcanic  stone  "in  a  style 
adopted,"  as  a  famous  traveler  writes, 
"after  the  earthquake  of  1821,  which  laid 
most  of  the  city  in  ruins,,  as  a  security 
against  similar  catastrophes."  Better 
than  any  other  large  building  I  know,  it 
represents  the  earthquake  phase.  It  is 
an  expedient,  complying  with,  while 
bravely  protesting  against,  imperative  de- 
mands of  the  plutonic  forces :  not  tow- 
ered and  domed,  like  the  cathedral  and 
the  Compania  at  Cuzco,  but  capped  with 


FIG.    1.    EXAMPLE    OF    WOOD-CARVING 
IN  THE   CATHEDRAL  AT   CUZCO,    PERU. 


538 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


spires  in  the  fashion  of  the  church  of 
San  Pedro  in  Lima.  We  may  scorn  it 
— in  a  photograph,  but  shall  not  easily 
do  so  in  its  own  proper  environment. 
Orderly  processes  of  development,  we  re- 
peat, having  been  interrupted  in  all  this 
region,  to  what  rank  shall  we  assign 
the  Arequipa  cathedral  (Fig.  4)  and  the 
other  West  Coast  "expedients"  ?  These 
external  columns,  supporting  nothing,  are 
architecturally  indefensible,  one  may  be 
tempted  to  say.  But  in  the  late  after- 
noon the  sunlight  catches  the  tops  of  the 
small  trees  in  the  plaza  and  the  more 
prominent  pillars  of  the  cathedral,  mak- 
ing the  gray,  long  fagade,  with  its  sur- 


FIG.  2.    A  SHRINE  IN  THE  CONVENT  CALLED 
LA  RECOLETA. 


plusage  of  columns,  seem  vigorous 
enough  to  support  the  load  of  Atlas ; 
catches  the  top  of  that  destructive  vol- 
cano called  Misti,  making  its  enormous 
mass  look  like  an  imponderable  cone  that 
one  could  walk  to  before  sundown, 
though  in  fact  to  reach  that  summit  and 
return  would  require  two  days'  hard 
riding  and  climbing;  so  then  Misti,  with 
sky  and  clouds  around  it,  drawing  near 
in  the  picture  at  that  hour,  is  apparently 
upheld  by  the  array  of  otherwise  unem- 
ployed columns.  We  shall,  I  think, 
classify  this  building  with  other  justified 
devices  or  expedients  as  examples  of  ex- 
ceptional environment,  so  remote  from 
normal  processes  of  architectural  evolu- 
tion that,  like  certain  variants  in  biology, 
they  have  no  issue.  Therefore,  or  rather, 
for  analogous  reasons,  we  come  upon  a 
sterile  West  Coast  period. 

In  Mexico  only,  among  all  Latin- 
American  mainland  countries,  has  Span- 
ish-Colonial architecture  secured  its  full 
and  consecutive  expression  and  develop- 
ment. We  note  here  three  main  periods : 

1.  The  earlier  structures,   erected  soon 
after  the  conquest  of  Mexico,  character- 
istics of  which  are  massive  strength  and 
utter  simplicity.     A  convenient  designa- 
tion is  the  one  already  employed,  "Fran- 
ciscan,"  or  Early   Franciscan ;  and  the 
term  forcibly  connotates  austerity,  rejec- 
tion of  adornment,  subordination  of  the 
aesthetic  to  the  useful ;  yet  we  should  not 
overlook  the  fact  that  the  Spanish  mon- 
archs  themselves,  for  the  better  protec- 
tion of  their  colonial  subjects,  ordained 
that   churches   should   be   so   built — for 
strength   rather   than   for   beauty,    with 
battlements  rather  than  ornaments — that 
they  could  serve  as  fortresses  in  time  of 
need."      Civil   and   religious   authorities 
were,  of  course,  in  absolute  agreement. 

2.  Spanish     Baroque.      3.    The    Chur- 
rigueresque  period,  from  the  first  part  of 
the  eighteenth  century  to  the  end  of  the 
Spanish  regime  in  Mexico.    In  its  origin 
strictly  and  peculiarly  Spanish,  the  Chur- 
rigueresque  style  may  be  likened  unto 
seed  falling  into  good  ground  and  bring- 
ing   forth    delightful    extravagances    or 
absurdities    "an    hundredfold"    only    in 

•Codification  of  the  Leyes  de  Indies,  Madrid,  1681 
Vol.  II..  folio  91.  Cited  in  "La  Arquitectura  en 
Mexico.  Iglesias,"  by  Antonio  Cort6s,  Mexico,  1914. 


FIG.  3.  PATIO  OF  LA  RECO- 
LETA,  NEAR  CUZCO,  PERU. 


FIG.  4.    THE  CATHEDRAL 
AT      AREQUIPA,      PERU. 


FIG.  5.  THE  CHAPEL  OF  THE 
WELL  (LA  CAPILLA  DEL  POCI- 
TO),  AT  GUADALUPE,  MEXICO. 


FIG.  6.    BALCONY  OF  THE  CATHE- 
DRAL AT  CUERNAVACA,   MEXICO. 


FIG.    7.       PAROCHIAL    CHURCH 
OF  TAXCO,  GUERRERO,  MEXICO. 


FIG.   8.       MONASTERY  IN 
SAN      ANGEL,      MEXICO. 


THE.    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


545 


FIG.   9.  CATHEDRAL  AT   CUERNAVACA,   MEXICO,    BEGUN  IN   1529.     THE  TOWER    (LEFT)    WAS 

REBUILT  IN  1721.     CHURCHYARD  SEEN  THROUGH  ARCHED  GATEWAY.     IN  THE 

FOREGROUND   (RIGHT)  IS  THE  CHURCH  OF  TERCER  ORDEN. 


Spain  and  her  colonies — nowhere  else. 
The  tendency  was  fully,  often  most  ex- 
travagantly, expressed  in  -Mexico  to 
abandon  structural  simplicity  in  favor  of 
mere  ornamentation — of  ornament  for 
ornament's  sake.  We  also  note  the  sur- 
vival of  the  artistic  traditions  of  the 
aborigines,  as  this  perpetuation  is  clearly 
shown,  for  example,  in  the  decoration-  of 
the  fagade  of  the  seventeenth  century 
Tercer  Orden  church  that  stands  by  the 
arched  gateway  giving  access  to  the 
cathedral  at  Cuernavaca.  Sefior  Cortes 
writes  succinctly :  "Because  the  artisans 
who  built  the  structures  of  the  conquer- 
ors were  natives,  the  new  architecture 
retained  characteristics  that  remind  one 
of  the  ancient  Mexican  decorative  art,  as 
we  even  now  may  see  in  the  chapels  of 
the  Hospital  de  Uruapan,  State  of  Mich- 
oacan,  of  Sanctorum  of  San  Joaquin, 


Federal  District,"  etc.  A  tendency  plainly 
discernible  in  recent  years — this  is  a  con- 
clusion based  upon  my  own  observations 
in  Mexico  in  1907 — gives  most  positive 
assurance  of  the  revival  of  ideals  in  art 
(such  as  they  were)  that  prevailed  be- 
fore the  conquest :  a  Nahuatl-Aztec  Ren- 
aissance. And,  finally,  we  note  the  uni- 
versal acceptance  by  Mexican  builders  of 
the  dome — an  architectural  feature  per- 
haps Persian,  certainly  Oriental  in  origin, 
but  popularized  by  great  sixteenth  cen- 
tury achievements  in  Italy.  We  must 
regard  it  as  the  predominating  architec- 
tural characteristic  of  the  country. 

Impressive  sincerity  and  simplicity, 
characterizing  early  Spanish  -  Colonial 
buildings,  gave  place  to  styles  that  Mexi- 
can art  critics  themselves  call  decadent. 
Familiar  examples  of  Spanish  Baroque 
are  the  church  of  Santo  Domingo  in 


54G 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


Oaxaca,  and  the  chapels  of  Santo  Cristo 
in  Tlacolula  and  of  Rosario  in  Puebla. 
Recent  comment  by  Senor  Cortes  on 
eighteenth  century  tendencies  is  fairly  in- 
dispensable at  this  point:  "In  Spain, 
Jose  Churriguera  and  his  two  sons, 
Jeronimo  and  Nicolas,  were  most  active 
in  promoting  the  Baroque,  impressing 
upon  it  so  much  of  their  own  personality 
that  in  process  of  time  their  interpreta- 
tion of  it  received  the  name  of  'Chur- 
rigueresque  style.'  The  Churrigueras, 
far  from  inventing  anything  new,  merely 
carried  to  extremes  the  decadent  ex- 
aggerations of  the  Baroque  style.  Where- 
as the  latter  had  respected  the  primitive 
simplicity  of  the  column  and  panel  and 
straight  outlines  and  had  safeguarded  the 
natural  independence  of  sculpture,  the 
Churrigueras  (on  the  contrary)  trans- 
formed columns  into  pilasters  covered 
with  decoration,  ornamented  the  panels, 
broke  up  all  the  lines,  and  made  sculpture 
an  integral  element  of  the  construction. 
By  such  means  .  .  .  they  reduced 
architecture  to  an  inferior  role,  and 
granted  complete  supremacy  to  decora- 
tion and  ornamentation  .  .  .  great 
approbation  was  granted  by  our  people 
to  this  style,  which  was  so  in  harmony 
with  our  ardent  and  lawless  imagina- 
tion. .  .  ."  Uncommonly  interesting, 
as  an  admission  on  the  part  of  an  accom- 
plished critic  in  Mexico.  But  let  us  now 
examine  Mr.  Ravel  1's  excellent  views 
(Figs.  6  and  9)  of  the  Cuernavaca  Ca- 
thedral, which  was  begun  in  1529 — its 


"old  balcon,"  as  this  detail  is  called  local- 
ly ;  and  the  comprehensive  view  show- 
ing, on  the  left,  a  tower  rebuilt  in  1721, 
the  arched  gateway  through  which  the 
large  churchyard  is  seen  and,  on  the 
right  hand,  the  church  of  the  Tercer  Or- 
den  of  San  Francisco  (seventeenth  cen- 
tury). Next,  we  may  turn  to  figure  No. 
8,  which  shows  the  harmonious  struc- 
tural lines,  unadorned,  of  the  monastery 
in  San  Angel.  Place  between  these  pho- 
tographs of  the  earlier  structures  the 
view  (Fig.  7)  of  that  perfect  ex- 
ample of  Churrigueresque,  the  Paro- 
chial Church  of  Taxco,  Guerrero  (com- 
pleted December  3,  1758),  with  florid 
ornamentation  on  towers,  above  roof- 
level,  and  on  facade  vividly  contrasting 
with  those  surfaces  of  the  towers  be- 
low the  roof-level,  which  are  plain : 
this  sharp  contrast  being  typically  Churri- 
gueresque. And,  finally  (Fig.  5),  the 
Chapel  of  the  Sacred  Well  (La  Capilla 
del  Pocito),  in  Guadalupe,  near  Mexico 
City,  completed  in  1791  by  the  architect 
Francisco  Guerrero  y  Torres.  In  this 
group  the  history  of  Mexican  architec- 
ture in  the  colonial  period  is  epitomized. 
Ardent  and  lawless  imagination  some- 
times produces  work  not  one-half  so- 
charming  as  these  sixteenth  to  eighteenth 
century  buildings.  Charming,  certainly, 
though  the  quest  of  sharp  contrasts  has 
tended  in  the  past  and  still  tends  ruin- 
ously toward  excesses — at  worst  repul- 
sive, at  best  recalling  those  observed  in 
the  Torretagle  house. 


DOORWAY  IN  THE  COLONNADE  OF  THE  NORTON  HOUSE,  EAST  GOSHEN,  CONN. 


COLONIAL  QAR.CHITECTVRE 

IN   COHWECTICVT 


Text  and  Measured  Drawings 
efherwood  Bessell 


PART  III. 


THE  color  note  in  Colonial  work  is 
the  doorway,  frequently  the  one 
spot  of  ornamentation.  On  it  was 
lavished  a  wealth  of  resources  to  obtain 
matchless  refinement  and  stateliness.  No 
matter  what  manner  of  house  you  may 
come  upon,  if  it  is  Colonial  the  doorway 
will  surely  arrest  attention;  only  in  the 
typical  doorway  of  the  smaller  houses 
does  one  see  repetition,  in  the  others 
there  is  the  widest  variance. 

The  doorway  of  the  large  Pratt  house, 
at  Essex,  has  the  flat  pediment  and  pilas- 
ter treatment,  with  the  frieze  omitted  in 
the  pediment  itself,  but  with  a  curved 
frieze  in  the  entablature  over  pilasters ; 
the  modillions  are  of  a  type  and  design 
often  seen  in  such  cornices ;  the  crown- 
ing mould  is  a  cyma-recta,  with  a  fillet  and 


cove  below,  then  a  fascia,  under  which 
are  the  modillions.  The  pilaster  cap  is  a 
quarter-round,  bevelled  on  the  top,  a  fillet 
and  cove,  with  a  half-round,  and  cove  for 
the  necking.  This  door,  with  the  excep- 
tion of  the  steps,  is  the  original,  and  is 
a  type  of  which  there  are  many  diversi- 
fications. 

The  detail  drawing  of  the  small  Pratt 
house  doorway,  on  Rope  Walk,  Essex, 
shows  a  doorway  of  the  same  character, 
but  with  a  complete  change  of  mouldings 
and  an  entirely  new  makeup.  One  has 
wide  latitude  in  the  designing  of  door- 
ways; so  many  ways  and  means  are  at 
hand  that  there  seems  to  be  no  end  of 
possibilities.  With  these  examples  be- 
fore us,  we  may  create  and  improve;, 
but  doorways  in  the  Colonial  manner  are 


548 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


hot  to  be  placed  promiscuously  on  all 
sorts  of  architectural  compositions;  use 
them  consistently,  and  the  charm  is  not 
lost.  The  pediment  treatment  may  have 
been  flat,  with  pilasters,  or  projected  suf- 
ficiently to  contain  a  disengaged  column, 
then  again  it  may  be  similar  to  the  en- 
trance doorway  of  the  Perry  House,  at 
Litchfield,  with  its  peculiar  doubled  sup- 
ports. This  doorway  was  built  in  1771 
by  Lynde  Lord.  The  cornice  members 
are  not  composed  as  called  for  by  Vig- 
riola,  and  seem  a  bit  crowded  in  line  on 
the  upper  portion.  The  dentils  are  very 
interesting,  being  long  and  cylindrical  in 
form.  The  small  supporting  columns  are 
exceedingly  attractive.  They  are  delicate 
and  refined,  and  tapering  from  top  to  bot- 
tom, are  two  and  seven-eighths  inches  in 
diameter  at  the  top  and  four  and  one- 
eighth  at  the  bottom.  The  side  lights  are 
curious  in  their  curved  muntins,  and  the 
whole  butts  into  the  overhang  of  the 
house  as  it  will. 

Other  motives  for  Colonial  doorways 
included  a  complete  entablature  sup- 
ported by  flat  pilasters  ;  or,  as  in  the  pedi- 
ment treatment,  disengaged  columns ;  or 
a  hood,  as  on  the  Perry  House. 


The  Seymour  doorway,  at  Litchfield, 
carries  with  it  a  great  deal  of  dignity ;  it 
is  well  proportioned,  has  an  attenuated 
feeling,  and  the  small  details  are  care- 
fully executed.  The  proportion  of  the 
entablature  does  not  follow  hard  and  fast 
rules  of  classic  proportion,  but  violates  it 
in  a  pleasing  manner  by  the  width  of  the 
fascia  and  the  small  architrave  members. 
The  pilaster  caps  likewise  are  not  in  ac- 
cord with  historic  precedent,  but  no  one 
will  deny  that  this  is  an  interesting  and 
well  designed  doorway. 

The  Butler  doorway,  at  Litchfield,  is 
similar  in  composition  to  the  Seymour; 
still  it  varies  ^enough  to  give  it  its  own 
distinction,  and  here  again  the  rules  are 
violated  in  the  width  of  the  fascia  and 
cornice;  the  architrave  also  is  of  a 
smaller  proportion  than  is  strictly  per- 
missible, yet  it  is  pleasing  to  the  eye  and, 
after  all,  proportion  is  decided  by  what 
pleases  the  eye.  Here  the  modillions  are 
used  as  on  the  pedimented  doors ;  the 
crowning  moulds  are  a  fillet  cove  and 
cyma  reversa,  then  the  small  fascia.  The 
sidelights  differ  from  the  customary 
handling,  but  they  have  an  individuality 
of  their  own  worth  adopting,  with  ad- 


TYPICAL  DOORWAY  OF  SMALL  HOUSE  OF  THE  PERIOD  OF  THE  CLASSIC  REVIVAL. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


549 


DOORWAY  OF  THE  PRATT  HOUSE,  ON  ROPE  WALK,  ESSEX,  CONN. 
Measured  and  Drawn  by  Wesley  Sherwood  Bessell. 


mirable  effects  possible.  Here  the  de- 
signer had  the  boldness  to  place  the  door- 
way on  a  corner  of  the  house,  which  is 
not  at  all  discordant.  A  great  deal  of 
quaintness  is  procured  very  often  by 
placing  a  doorway  in  this  manner.  It 
need  not  be  the  main  entrance,  but  if 
well  placed  it  will  add  a  homely  feeling 
not  at  all  undesirable. 

The  door  of  the  Town  Hall  at  Essex 
is  in  a  wood  structure  and  is  somewhat 
Greek  in  feeling.  It  is  extremely  beauti- 
ful, the  panelled  door  itself  being  care- 
fully thought  out  and  the  sill  and  plinth 
block  being  entirely  different  from  any 
other.  Doorways  of  this  character  are 


too  seldom  used — simple  and  dignified, 
but  with  "quality"  in  abundance. 

Again,  different  from  both  of  the  pre- 
ceding ones,  is  the  doorway  to  the  Norton 
house,  at  Goshen.  Like  the  house  itself, 
the  details  are  refinement  at  its  best.  The 
fanlight  and  sidelights,  designed  with  the 
door  as  a  whole,  and  the  coupled  columns 
between  the  door  and  sidelights  are  ta- 
pered and  beaded.  The  entablature  con- 
tains an  interesting  bracket  treatment, 
and  the  motive  on  the  fascia  of  the  entab- 
lature of  the  main  hood  is  exquisite  in 
composition.  Still  another  door  to  this 
house  is  the  small  side  door  under  the 
colonnade,  showing  a  plain  treatment 


550 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


Uil 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


5.51 


$ 


•ni- 


Id 


v- 


E   LE  VAT  I  0  N 


j      P  LA  N 


DOORWAY  OF  THE  SEYMOUR  HOUSE, 
LITCHFIELD,  CONN.  MEASURED  AND 
DRAWN  BY  WESLEY  SHERWOOD  BESSELL. 


DETAIL  OF  A  CHURCH  DOOR  AT  AVON, 
CONN.  MEASURED  AND  DRAWN 
•  BY  WESLEY  SHERWOOD  BESSELL. 


DOORWAY  OF  THE  SILLS  HOUSE,  SILLS- 
VILLE,  CONN.  MEASURED  AND  DRAWN 
BY  WESLEY  SHERWOOD  BESSELL. 


DOORWAY       OF       THE       PORTER 
HOUSE,   SAYBROOK   POINT,  CONN. 


556 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


A  V- 

s=sS( 

E_ 

—  r*  ' 

t, 

; 

^w 

• 

^*^^^ 

•    r-^ 

r'     • 

—i  _ 

•i 

-±-n 
< 

' 

-v 

•  —  15'— 

Jj   * 

£  4 

1  i  .              (  — 

' 

• 

4  {                                     v\ 

1 

i-l                                  \ 

^ 

i 

J 

ft 

c 

*, 

4 

''"N 

\ 

— 

i)     <= 

a 

' 

a. 

DETAIL  A 

— 

1  1  1  1  r  —  r      f      f.  —  f 

£> 

-—  t"* 

.a 

P 

J 

t 

SCXSUt         IN          INCHED 

L 

— 



*  T? 

I 

£ 

•^^             \ 

*• 

~"Vr\ 

1— 

\ 

TA  I~T  A  1  I      H. 

J 

J 

I)p  lAII  ft                               v  - 

fcY  W-"  C~^e  II. 

DOORWAY  OF  THE  TOWN  HALL  AT  ESSEX,  CONN. 


with  small  fanlight ;  it  is  placed  off  cen- 
tre of  the  colonnade,  but  on  centre  of 
the  main  hall. 

The  Cowles  doorway  presents  another 
handling.  The  peculiar  inverted  tapered 
columns  are  delightful,  and  could  be 
copied  advantageously,  not  alone  in  this 
manner,  but  with  variable  treatments. 
The  single  header  brick  arch  is  a  three- 
point  arch  and  has  a  high  shouldered 
spring. 

Still  another  brick-set  doorway  is  the 
one  at  Saybrook  Point,  entirely  foreign 
to  the  others,  and  yet  Colonial.  It  is 
heavier  in  detail  and  of  a  later  period. 
The  composition,  however,  lends  itself  to 
far  better  effects  than  may  be  at  first 
realized,  and  as  the  others  had  their  in- 
dividuality, so  has  this  its  unlimited  op- 
portunities. 

The  Sills  doorway,  at  Sillsville,  is  of 
a  design  seldom  used,  and  the  broad,  flat 
pilaster  with  channelled  rosette  was  orig- 
inally under  a  hood  projecting  from  the 
house  proper.  The  doors  themselves  are 
the  original  ones  and  are  very  good  in 
their  panelled  composition.  The  double 


doors,  however,  were  seldom  used  on  Co- 
lonial houses,  being  of  Dutch  origin,  and 
were  evidently  incorporated  into  this  Co- 
lonial doorway  by  a  Dutch  settler. 

An  interesting  door  is  that  of  the 
church  at  Avon,  with  detail  not  unlike 
that  of  some  doors  found  in  New  York 
City.  The  beaded  pilaster  and  soffit  of 
the  arch  are  charming,  and  the  moulded 
members  of  the  cap  and  base  have  that 
reaching  effect  so  often  adopted  by  Col- 
onial builders  in  copies  of  the  classic 
mouldings. 

Our  small  selection  of  photographs  and 
details  show  decided  differences  in  hand- 
ling. Each  doorway  is  of  a  type  peculiar 
to  itself,  yet  purely  Colonial  in  feeling. 
The  number  of  doorway  examples  pro- 
curable from  Colonial  work  would  fill 
pages,  while  examples  of  variable  designs 
in  buildings  would  fill  but  little  space. 
The  doorwav  received  the  greater  de- 
tailed attention,  making  it  the  color  note 
in  the  design.  The  study  of  ornament 
was  given  unstintingly  to  the  doorway, 
the  hospitable  Colonial  doorway,  which 
leads  to  the  fireside. 


HOUSE  AT  NO.  20  BENEZET  STREET, 
CHESTNUT  HILL,  PA.  DUHRING, 
OKIE  AND  ZIEGLER.  ARCHITECTS. 


NDRY 

7-a  <  \i-  o'  M4      l2-o"  K,  14-  o 


\ 


FIRST  FLOOR  PLAN  OF  NO.  20  BENEZET 
STREET,  CHESTNUT  HILL,  PA.  DUHR- 
ING,  OKIE  AND  ZIEGLER,  ARCHITECTS. 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


559 


LIVING  ROOM  FIREPLACE,  NO.  20  BENEZET  STREET,  CHESTNUT  HILL,   PA. 
Duhring,   Okie   and   Ziegler,  Architects. 


A  SECOND  FLOOR  ROOM  AT  NO.  20  BENEZET  STREET,  CHESTNUT  HILL,   PA. 
Duhring,  Okie  and  Ziegler,  Architects. 


560 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


eg 


- 


VIEW  AND  GROUND  FLOOR  PLAN  OF  THE 
NEWS-PRESS  BUILDING,  ST.  JOSEPH. 
MO.  ECKEL  &  ALDRICH,  ARCHITECTS. 


DETAIL— THE      NEWS-PRESS      BUILDING,      ST. 
JOSEPH,  MO.    ECKEL  &  ALDRICH,  ARCHITECTS. 


562 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


T^.  o   o   r 

•  ED  1  TORJ  A  L 

• 

•  RpOM 

•ri 

|    U    :'      >. 

T-J 

'  'T3 

•   1^  ,0     O    F.- 

MANAGING-                           i 
•EDITOR_  f     1 

OTOILET 
*5   .    Toi 

. 

I     l^APHES 
^^l 

i 

PUBLISHER; 

i 

Inf:!- 

Plan   of   Second    Floor. 


Plan  of  Basement  Floor. 

THE  NEWS-PRESS  BUILDING,  ST.  JOSEPH,  MO. 
Eckel  &  Aldrich,  Architects. 


ARCHI  "Ec 


BOOKS  ON  MEDIEVAL  ARCHITECTURE 

By  RICHARD  FRANZ  BACH 

Curator,  School  of  Architecture,  Columbia  University 
PART  II. 


TO  Winston's  Hints  on  Glass  Paint- 
ing, published  in  1847,  and  Fowler's 
praiseworthy  Engravings  of  Mosaic 
Pavements  and  Stained  Class,  published 
in  1805,  is  now  added  a  third  volume  de- 
voted to  the  glass  art  in  England.  It  is 
Philip  Nelson's  Ancient  Painted  Glass  in 
England,  1170-1500  (George  H.  Doran 
Company,  New  York,  and  Methuen  and 
Company,  London ;  octavo,  pp.  xvii-280, 
33  plates,  $3).  This  volume  is  not  the 
effusion  of  a  medieval  enthusiast,  like 
that  of  M.  Male  just  reviewed,  but  rather 
a  detailed  chronological  study  of  English 
glass  of  the  Middle  Ages  from  the  late 
twelfth  to  the  beginning  of  the  sixteenth 
century.  The  author  has  done  his  work 
in  a  painstaking  fashion;  leaving  no  stone 
unturned  in  his  search  for  all  possible 
material.  Fortunately  he  writes  as  one 
personally  familiar  with  all  the  import- 
ant glasses  mentioned  in  his  text.  Mr. 
Nelson  has  encountered,  as  has  many 
another  searcher  in  the  rich  field  of  Eng- 
lish Gothic  art,  untold  obstacles  and 
causes  of  unconscious  errors  in  present 
judgment  due  on  the  one  hand  to  de- 
struction and  neglect  and  on  the  other 
hand  to  the  benighted  efforts  of  self- 


styled  "restorers,"  unbridled  archaeo- 
logical fanatics  of  another  day,  happily 
past.  Two  interesting  chapters  added  to 
the  historical  sequence  on  church  glass 
are  those  on  "English  Domestic  Glass" 
and  on  the  "Vicissitudes  of  Ancient 
Glass."  Too  little  has  yet  been  written  on 
the  former  of  these  subjects  and,  inci- 
dentally, on  the  development  of  the  Eng- 
lish heraldic  windows,  which  are  among 
the  most  interesting  features  of  certain 
manor  houses.  More  than  half  of  the 
volume  is  assigned  to  pages  of  "County 
Lists  of  Ancient  Glass,"  and  end- 
less alphabetical  arrangement  that  leads 
us  to  marvel  at  the  great  number 
of  windows  that  have  outlived  wanton 
destruction,  carelessness  and  nineteenth 
century  restoration.  There  is  an  appen- 
dix on  this  matter  of  restoration  and  also 
a  detailed  index.  Color  plates  in  such  a 
book  as  this  are  bound  to  come  amiss,  for 
we  have  not  yet  devised  a  process  of  re- 
producing perfectly  the  effect  of  color 
due  to  transparency  by  means  of  poly- 
chrome plates  in  which  the  effects  must 
be  due  to  reflection.  However,  this  hand- 
icap must  not  be  permitted  to  militate 
against  the  general  utility  of  Mr.  Nel- 


564 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


son's  book ;  it  will  surely  prove  a  valuable 
architect's  handbook  of  study  and  travel 
in  England. 

Miss  Helen  Marshall  Pratt,  author  of 
The  Cathedral  Churches  of  England,  has 
now  published  more  particular  studies  on 
the  British  national  sepulchre  under  the 
title  Westminster  Abbey;  Its  Architec- 
ture, History  and  Monuments  (Duffield 
and  Company,  New  York;  12mo,  two 
volumes,  pp.  865,  ill.;  $4.50).  To  chron- 
icle the  life  history  of  a  structure  in 
which  the  ideals  and  very  existence  of  a 
nation  for  a  period  of  a  thousand  years 
have  been  focused  demands  untiring 
study  and  a  hardy  pen.  Miss  Pratt  has 
well  acquitted  herself  of  an  exacting 
task.  She  has  been  at  great  pains  to  work 
out  faithfully  the  historical,  and  ecclesio- 
logic  background  which  must  temper  the 
progress  of  such  a  building,  and  her  care 
m  this  respect  will  give  an  added  charm 
to  the  Abbey  for  many  a  reader,  espe- 
cially for  Americans,  and  will  determine 
in  great  measure  the  lasting  quality  of 
her  book.  The  volumes  are  profusely 
illustrated;  there  are  appendices  restat- 
ing in  tabulated  form  the  history  of  the 
building  itself  and  its  accessory  fabric, 
and  giving  lists  of  abbots  and  deans. 
There  is  also  an  exhaustive  index  and  an 
exceptionally  good  bibliography.  We  can 
commend  this  work  as  one  of  the  class 
of  Cathedrals  and  Cloisters  of  Northern 
France,  reviewed  elsewhere,  not  exces- 
sively technical,  nor  deeply  archaeological, 
nor  in  any  sense  controversial ;  it  is  sim- 
ply historical  and  all  architectural  un- 
certainty is  left  for  more  professional 
but  less  readable  publications.  The  Abbey 
has  not  often  had  so  careful  a  historian. 

In  The  English  Parish  Church;  An 
Account  of  the  Chief  Building  Types  and 
of  Their  Materials  During  Nine  Cen- 
turies (Charles  Scribner's  Sons,  New 
York,  and  B.  T.  Batsford,  London;  oc- 
tavo, pp.  xix-338,  ill.;  $3),  Mr.  J. 
Charles  Cox  has  given  us  an  altogether 
useful  volume  upon  a  subject  not  gen- 
erally granted  its  due  importance  in 
English  architectural  history.  Mr.  Fran- 
cis Bond,  in  English  Church  Architec- 
ture, has  also  expanded  upon  the  merits 
of  the  English  parish  church,  but  Mr. 
Cox  has  at  last  brought  together  in  a 


separate  treatise  the  whole  study  of 
plan,  style  and  materials  in  buildings  of 
this  type,  so  that  it  may  once  more  as- 
sume its  proper  place  as  a  determining 
phase  of  English  medieval  art. 

To  begin  with,  "the  parish,  with  its 
church  and  priest,  was  an  arrangement 
specially  devised  to  meet  the  needs  of 
the  country  rather  than  the  city,"  and 
was  developed  directly  from  the  early 
practice  of  attaching  chaplains  to  lordly 
manors.  The  growing  power  of  the 
church  soon  detached  the  chaplain,  who 
served  the  retainers  as  well  as  the  lords, 
from  the  manor  house  and  placed  him 
in  charge  of  his  own  church  edifice, 
which  duly  became  the  religious  center 
for  a  more  or  less  loosely  defined  dis- 
trict. The  district  may  at  times  have 
included  several  manors,  and  its  presid- 
ing priest  was  of  the  secular  as  dis- 
tinguished from  the  monastic  or  regular 
clergy. 

The  parish  church  was  the  most  demo- 
cratic factor  in  English  feudal  life;  at 
parish  meetings  lord  and  tenant,  villein 
and  serf  met  on  equal  footing.  Further- 
more the  church  building  was  erected  in 
close  proximity  to  any  public  buildings 
of  which  the  community  might  boast  and 
in  towns  the  houses  of  the  citizens  clus- 
tered closely  about  it.  In  times  of  danger 
from  fire,  riot,  robbery  or  conquest 
public  and  personal  treasures  were  stored 
in  the  church,  while  deeds  and  other 
valuable  writings  were  placed  in  the 
parish  chest  for  safe  keeping.  Contracts 
were  signed  in  the  church  porch ;  agree- 
ments concerning  the  parish  at  large 
were  sworn  to  on  the  altar  itself.  The 
church  porch  was  also  the  scene  of  the 
coroner's  inquest  in  cases  of  violent  death 
in  the  parish.  To  these  many  public  uses 
should  also  be  added  that  of  sheltering 
fugitives  at  a  time  when  capital  punish- 
ment was  meted  out  to  the  smallest  of- 
fender. 

For  many  years  students  endeavored 
to  read  the  significance  of  the  parish 
church  in  arcades,  windows,  mouldings 
and  the  like ;  while  the  real  life  of  build- 
ings of  this  type,  as  Mr.  Cox  points  out, 
is  to  be  sought  in  plan  development.  The 
plan  was  divided,  as  a  general  rule,  into 
nave  and  sanctuary,  although  numerous 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


565 


examples  occur  in  which  an  intermediate 
chancel  appears.  There  are  also  many 
larger  parish  churches,  especially  those 
in,  city  centres,  whose  plans  show  nave, 
transepts,  sanctuary  and  lantern  tower. 
Each  of  these  types  has  its  variants; 
hybrid  plans,  accomplished  by  bringing 
together  parts  of  the  three  types  or  their 
variants,  or  by  differing  dispositions  of 
towers  or  of  chapels,  contribute  an  in- 
finite variety  which  is  at  first  confusing. 
Mention  should  also  be  made  of  a  pos- 
sible fourth  type,  the  circular  churches, 
such  as  St.  Sepulchre's,  Northampton. 
Of  these  there  are  but  four  extant.  Good 
illustrations  of  the  other  fundamental 
types  are  easily  found.  The  simple  nave 
and  chancel  plan  appears  at  Chithurst, 
Sussex,  or  at  Little  Braxted,  Essex,  the 
first  square  ended  and  the  latter  with 
apsidal  eastern  termination.  Such  ex- 
amples date  chiefly  from  the  twelfth  cen- 
tury, as  do  likewise  those  of  the  second 
type.  This  has  a  triple  plan  division,  e.g., 
nave,  chancel,  sanctuary,  and  is  well 
shown  at  Kilpeck,  Herefordshire,  or, 
with  chancel  and  sanctuary  combined  and 
a  tower  replacing  the  former,  at  Stewk- 
ley,  Buckinghamshire.  The  third  type 
leads  us  at  once  into  the  history  of  the 
transept — placed  properly  in  Byzantine 
and  Early  Christian  Europe — and  its 
variations  are  too  many  to  be  adequately 
substantiated  by  less  than  a  round  dozen 
of  illustrations ;  fairly  typical  are  Witney 
in  Oxfordshire,  Uffington  in  Berkshire, 
or  Old  Basing  in  Hampshire. 

Having  thus  set  forth  the  various  type 
forms  of  plan  which  characterize  the 
English  parish  church,  and  having  shown 
how  the  simplest  of  these  types  may  de- 
velop into  the  most  complex  in  the  course 
of  its  life  history,  Mr.  Cox  undertakes  to 
explain  in  the  same  systematic  fashion 
the  evolution  of  aisles,  clearstories  and 
chapels.  Other  sections  of  the  excellent 
chapter  on  plan  are  assigned  to  studies  of 
the  cross  plan,  the  tower,  the  porch,  ves- 
try and  ambulatory. 

A  long  chapter  is  next  devoted  to 
"Architectural  styles  in  the  English 
parish  church."  Mr.  Cox  recognizes 
seven  steps  in  stylistic  growth:  1,  Saxon; 
2.  Norman ;  3.  Transitional ;  4.  Early 
English;  5.  Geometrical;  6.  Decorated; 
7.  Perpendicular.  This  classification  car- 


ries his  study  from  the  Romano-British 
church  excavated  at  Silchester  in  1892, 
a  truly  pre-Saxon  structure,  as  well  as 
Brixworth  and  Earl's  Barton  Tower  at 
one  end,  to  the  fine  examples  at  Grant- 
ham,  Lincolnshire,  at  Stratford-on-Avon, 
and  that  of  Saint  Nicholas,  King's  Lynn 
at  the  other,  and  covers  the  whole  de- 
velopment of  vaulting,  tracery  and  carved 
ornament. 

The  chapter  on  building  materials  is 
of  great  value.  This  side  of  the  question 
of  medieval  work  has  received  the  mini- 
mum of  attention  in  the  past;  and  Mr. 
Cox's  findings  in  this  direction  furnish 
an  important  contribution  toward  the 
revived  study  of  the  parish  church. 
Stone,  flint,  brick  and  plaster  are  consid- 
ered in  detail,  with  their  many  and  varied 
illustrations,  while  the  section  on  wood 
as  a  structural  material  is  enll/ened  by 
interesting  discussions  concerning  doors 
and  timber  roofs. 

This  volume  is  without  doubt  the  best 
presentation  that  the  English  parish 
church  has  yet  enjoyed.  It  maintains  the 
excellent  quality  of  Mr.  Cox's  earlier 
book  on  English  Church,  Furniture, — to 
which  he  devotes  but  little  attention  in 
the  volume  under  discussion, — as  well  as 
the  recognized  standard  of  the  Scribner- 
Batsford  publications.  There  are  over 
two  hundred  and  seventy  illustrations,  a 
register  of  churches  by  counties  and  an 
excellent  index;  the  volume  lacks  only  a 
bibliography,  which,  in  the  first  separate 
and  complete  treatment  of  the  subject, 
would  have  been  particularly  in  place. 

Certain  architectural  books  of  defin- 
itely assured  quality  defy  the  accumula- 
tion of  fresh  archaeological  data.  Such 
was  Gaston  Maspero's  Manual  of  Egyp- 
tian Archaeology,  recently  republished  by 
Putnam's,  and  another  such  is  George 
Edmund  Street's  Some  Account  of 
Gothic  Architecture  in  Spain.  Works  of 
this  category  may  be  reissued  and  re- 
edited,  but  to  gather  the  material  afresh 
for  a  new  book  in  fields  thus  already  cov- 
ered would  be  gratuitous  labor.  Street's 
book  is  now  issued  in  two  volumes  under 
the  editorship  of  Georgiana  Goddard 
King  (E.  P.  Button,  New  York,  and  J. 
M.  Dent  &  Sons,  London ;  12mo,  pp.  356 
and  352,  ill.;  $2).  Fortunately  the  text 
has  been  held  inviolate  unless  it  was  nee- 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


essary  to  bring  it  to  date;  and,  we  ven- 
ture to  say,  wisely,  the  scope  of  the  book 
has  been  considerably  widened  and  its 
value  heightened  by  Miss  King's  grasp 
and  understanding  of  the  subject  as  well 
as  of  her  author.  The  additions  to  the 
text  are  not  many,  for,  says  the  editor, 
Street  was  very  thorough  and  Spain  is 
very  slow.  What  is  more,  the  clearness 
of  Street's  vision  has  given  a  permanence 
to  the  truths  that  he  saw  in  the  stones 
which  later  critics  and  writers  can  only 
echo.  The  original  illustrations  from 
Street's  sketches  have  been  retained  and 
the  editor's  notes  have  been  set  apart  at 
the  end  of  -each  chapter.  We  might 
counsel  a  similiar  good  judgment  for  all 
prospective  editors  of  recognized  works, 
for  a  careless  or  unscrupulous  editor  is 
poor  sauce  to  good  meat.  The  present 
editor  has  gone  about  her  work  in  an 
efficient  manner  and  her  additions  are 
made  with  a  briskness  that  characterizes 
the  handbook ;  Street  never  meant  his 
Account  to  be  anything  else  but  a  hand- 
book. "Baedeker  is  for  the  best  part 
carved  out  of  Street"  and  Street  must 
be  made  to  fill  the  gaps  in  the  modern 
guide.  The  format  of  the  new  edition, 
which  is  slight  and  easily  handled,  ren- 
ders it  eminently  useful  for  this  purpose, 
although  it  has  fallen  into  the  usual  evil 
of  small  crowded  type  which  makes  the 
notes,  at  least,  troublesome  reading.  We 
should  also  have  appreciated  a  few  mod- 
ern photographic  illustrations.  But  these 
•defects  are  readily  overlooked.  We  are 
glad  to  welcome  this  and  other  editions 
of  Street,  as  we  should  new  editions 
of  Piranesi  or  of  DuCerceau ;  students 
need  them  and  architectural  books  of 
quality  are  too  few  in  this  country. 

A  Guide  to  Gothic  Architecture  by  Mr. 
T.  Francis  Bumpus  (Dodd,  Mead  and 
Company,  New  York;  octavo,  pp.  xii- 
359,  ill.;  $3),  leads  us  to  expect  in  its 
title  a  terse  general  text  book.  Instead, 
the  author  devotes  three  hundred  pages 
to  the  history  of  English  architecture,  al- 
ready adequately  treated  by  Francis  Bond 
and  others,  and  recalling  somewhat  his 
Cathedrals  of  England;  while  only  fifty 
pages  remain  for  a  short  summary  ac- 
count of  the  style  elswhere.  Although 
there  are  over  one  hundred  and 


forty  illustrations,  these  are  indistinct 
and  of  small  scale;  while  only  a  very 
few  poorly  drawn  plans  appear.  The 
text  is  well  written,  however,  and  set 
in  large  type.  There  is  also  a  glossary  of 
architectural  terms  and  a  brief  index. 

Mr.  William  Gorham  Rice  sounds  a 
fresh  and  attractive  theme  in  his  Caril- 
lons of  Belgium  and  Holland;  Tower 
Music  in  the  Low  Countries  (John  Lane 
Company,  New  York  and  London ;  oc- 
tavo, pp.  232,  ill.;  $1.50).  It  is  remark- 
able that  a  subject  of  such  interest  and 
historic  value  should  so  long  have 
escaped  the  writers,  especially  since  Mr. 
Rice  records  nearly  sixty  carillons  in 
Holland  and  about  fifty  in  Belgium.  The 
author  explains  at  length  the  mechanism, 
method  of  ringing  and  history  of  the 
bells  and  of  the  quaint  traditional  occu- 
pation of  carilloneur,  which,  like  that 
of  bell  founder,  is  an  honorable  family 
occupation  handed  on  through  succeed- 
ing generations.  Extensive  appendices 
contain  lists  of  carillons  in  the  Low 
Countries  and  elsewhere  in  Europe,  as 
well  as  in  the  United  States. 

A  new  book  on  the  Lombard  Towns  of 
Italy,  or  The  Cities  of  Ancient  Lom- 
bardy  (Dodd,  Mead  and  Company,  New 
York;  12mo,  pp.  xvii-590,  ill;  $1.75), 
completes  Mr.  Egerton  R.  Williams'  tril- 
ogy of  volumes  on  Italian  cities  of  which 
the  others  bear  the  titles  The  Hill  Towns 
of  Italy  and  The  Plain  Toums  of  Italy, 
dealing  respectively  with  the  less  known 
cities  of  the  Apennines  and  the  region 
north  of  Rome,  and  of  Venetia.  Mr. 
Williams  has  set  out  to  write  a  guide 
book  and  has  succeeded  admirably.  He 
has  also  adopted  the  guide  book  size  for 
his  work  and  in  this  respect  the  present 
volume  is  an  improvement  upon  its 
predecessors.  There  is  a  good  map  of 
Lombardy  and  a  thorough  index.  Books 
of  this  kind  are  to  be  recommended  for 
the  use  of  the  architect,  for  they  offer 
whenever  required  the  necessary  jog  to 
the  memory  that  would  entail  much 
searching  in  a  larger  work.  They  offer 
also  in  a  concise  form  the  historic  fea- 
tures of  a  given  structure,  names  of 
architects  and  dates,  which  are  invariably 
buried  in  controversy  in  the  more  directly 
architectural  publications. 


NOTES 

AND 
COMMENTS 


A   Water   Color 

Sketch    in 
Terra  Cotta. 


The  little  building  of 
the  Edison  shops  on 
Fifth  Avenue,  just  be- 
low Forty-first  Street, 
has  all  the  freshness  and 
sparkle  of  a  water  color 
sketch.  It  is  full  of  in- 
terest and  the  personal- 
ity of  its  authors.  But  one  cannot  help 
feeling  that  the  detail  of  the  top  story 
and  the  cornice  do  not  seem  to  be  alto- 
gether in  harmony  with  that  of  the  lower 
stories'.  One  wonders  whether  they  were 
not  detailed  on  different  sheets  and  not 
seen  together  until  the  whole  was  in 
place.  The  modelling  of  the  terra  cotta 
in  flat  relief,  the  texture  of  the  terra  cotta, 
and  the  use  of  gold  in  connection  with 
this  material  are  all  of  great  interest. 


An     English     contem- 
England's  porary  confides  to  us  its 

Imminent  suspicion  that  there  may 

Italian  be  some  truth  in  the  ru- 

Revival.  mor    of 'another    Italian 

revival  in  England.  A 
glorious  age,  this,  when 
one  may  proclaim  a  re- 
vival; when  we  may  run  the  gamut  of  the 
architectural  records  of  the  past,  and  deck 
out  a  tradition  in  modern  materials  with- 
out a  hint  of  modern  interpretation.  We 
may  yet  have  a  stylistic  arbiter,  who  shall 
dictate  the  progress  of  the  orderly  repeti- 
tion of  dead  forms,  a  sort  of  Paul  Poiret  of 
stone  and  steel.  Says  the  Architects'  and 
Builders'  Journal:  "The  spirit  is  yet  but 
moving  on  the  face  of  the  waters'.  But 
soon  the  new  thing  will  be  made  manifest, 
and  perchance  we  shall  be  harking  back 
once  more  to  Letarouilly  .  .  ."  Indeed, 
so  long  as  we  add  so  little  of  the  person- 
ality of  our  time  to  the  types  we  find  in 
past  styles,  we  might  as  well  hark  back  to 


Churriguera.  Perhaps  after  we  have  gone 
the  rounds  of  reviving  once  more  we  shall 
have  had  time  to  devote  to  an  architectural 
twentieth  century.  In  this  country,  at  least, 
we  have  the  greatest  opportunity,  and,  what 
is  more,  we  have  a  saving  eclecticism  of 
taste  to  fall  back  upon. 


A  Venial 

Professional 

Transgression. 


Two  major  causes  have 
at  last  been  fixed  upon 
for  the  present  weakened 
condition  of  old  St. 
Paul's,  London.  The  piers 
are  in  critical  state  be- 
cause Wren  determined 
to  use  softer  stone  in 
place  of  the  specified  Portland  stone,  which 
required  much  time  in  transit  under  con- 
temporary conditions.  What  is  more,  the 
great  chain  which  binds  the  stone  work  at 
the  base  of  the  dome  has  been  found  to  be 
rusting.  Mr.  Marvyn  Macartney  has'  in  an 
official  capacity  investigated  these  weak- 
nesses, which  have  been  the  cause  of  a 
growing  uneasiness  in  London,  and  the 
burden  of  his  report  seems  to  show,  be- 
tween the  lines,  that  Wren  was  actuated  by 
the  most  human  desire  that  ever  moved  an 
architect  to  commit  a  professional  sin.  He 
wanted  to  see  his  masterwork  completed 
within  his  lifetime.  No  doubt  he  valued  it 
even  higher  than  his  projected  scheme  for 
laying  out  London  anew  after  the  memor- 
able devastation  of  1666.  For  the  long 
years  from  1675  to  1710  he  worked  upon 
this  building  with  unflagging  devotion, 
feeling  no  doubt  from  the  outset  that  it 
was  destined  to  be  the  focus  of  the  English 
Renaissance  in  church  building;  and  at  the 
end  the  greatest  pleasure  that  could  come 
to  a  man  engaged  upon  great  work  was 
vouchsafed  him.  The  Underground  was 
not  within  his  ken  and  the  pleasure  of  pos- 
terity in  his  building  evidently  clashed  in 
his  mind  with  his  personal  wish  to  witness 


568 


THE    ARCHITECTURAL    RECORD. 


the  dedication  of  a  completed  St.  Paul's. 
The  artist's  dream  sought  its  realization 
and  succeeded.  Nor  should  we  impugn  his 
morals,  for  he  was  impelled  by  the  most 
praiseworthy  of  professional  weaknesses. 


The   Arch 

of 
Constantine. 


The  secret  of  the 
Arch  of  Constantine  has 
at  last  been  explained. 
Professor  Arthur  L 
Frothingham,  an  indefat- 
igable student  of  Ro- 
man archaeology,  with 
the  assistance  of  the 
Italian  government,  in  the  person  of  Com- 
mendatore  Corrado  Ricci,  has  made  an  ex- 
tensive examination  of  the  structure.  The 
investigation  included  a  detailed  study  of 
the  reliefs  on  the  arch  at  close  range  and, 
as  far  as  possible,  of  the  masonry.  Basing 
his  conclusions  chiefly  upon  an  intimate  and 
comprehensive  understanding  of  Roman 
sculpture,  Professor  Frothingham  has  pub- 
lished in  the  American  Journal  of  Archae- 
ology a  series  of  papers  demonstrating  that 
the  old  theory  of  a  reconstruction  of  one 
of  the  Trajan  arches,  either  that  in  the  Via 
Appia  or  that  in  the  Forum  of  Trajan,  is 
untenable.  The  arch  in  question  was  dedi- 
cated to  Constantine  in  313,  but  this  could 
not  have  been  an  original  dedication,  since 
such  arches  were  voted  only  in  connection 
with  a  triumph,  which  in  terms  of  Roman 
law  was  passed  upon  by  the  Senate  and 
connoted  the  conquest  of  a  foreign  foe. 
Constantine  had  waged  no  war  of  foreign 
conquest,  and  his  greatest  military  exploit 
was  that  which  culminated  in  the  defeat  of 
Maxentius  at  the  Milvian  Bridge.  It  was 
there,  incidentally,  that  his  conversion  to 
the  Christian  faith  took  tangible  form,  for 
it  was  under  the  labanim,  bearing  the  em- 
blem of  Christianity  that  his  soldiers 
achieved  the  victory. 

But  if  the  arch  was  not  primarily  dedi- 
cated to  Constantine  the  Great,  what  previ- 
ous occasion  had  caused  it  to  be  built? 
The  solution  is  that  in  the  case  of  Con- 
stantine we  deal  with  a  rededication,  and 
that  therefore  the  arch  was  erected  for  an 
earlier  emperor.  But  arches  were  justified 


only  by  the  pleasure  of  the  Senate  of  the 
Imperial  City;  and  their  destruction  de- 
pended also  upon  that  pleasure.  An  arch 
or  other  memorial  might  remain  standing 
for  all  time  as  a  record  of  the  glory  of  a 
ruler,  but  if  the  surfeit  of  his  victories  de- 
veloped in  him  the  germ  of  tyranny,  the 
Senate  could  cause  his  monuments  to  be 
cast  down  and  his  effigy  to  be  mutilated. 
This  was  authorized  by  that  governing 
body  in  the  form  of  the  memoriae  damna- 
tio,  a  decree  which  implied  the  wanton  de- 
struction of  all  memorials  of  the  tyrant 
and  the  defacing  of  his  images;  the  struc- 
tures so  treated  also  became  no  man's  prop- 
erty, and  stood  uncared  for  as  an  index  of 
popular  disfavor. 

The  investigator's  study  of  the  reliefs 
and  of  the  technique  of  their  carving  led 
him  to  ascribe  the  construction  of  the  arch 
to  the  time  of  Domitian,  who  was  emperor 
from  81  to  96  A.  D.,  over  two  hundred 
years  before  the  reign  of  Constantine. 
This  emperor  had  made  conquests  in  the 
east  and  in  his  case  also  the  Senate  had 
voted  that  the  infamous  name  be  erased 
from  the  monuments.  Among  the  monu- 
ments to  suffer  from  the  denunciation  and 
consequent  mutilation  was  the  present  arch, 
which  stood  thereafter  for  many  years  un- 
claimed. Reliefs  of  the  intervening  period 
show  it  in  position,  and  the  carvings  in  the 
arch  itself  are  assuredly  of  the  earlier  time, 
harking  back  to  Greek  suggestions  or  ac- 
tual workmanship.  The  inscriptions,  the 
heads  of  Domitian,  as  well  as  other  injured 
parts  were  in  all  cases  carved  anew  and 
certain  medallions  added.  The  mode  of  in- 
sertion of  these  medallions  betrays  their 
later  provenience,  since  the  regular  prac- 
tice of  Roman  construction  is  not  adhered 
to,  as  would  be  imperative  in  the  case  of  a 
single  uniform  structure.  These  alterations 
were  made  in  the  time  of  Constantine;  for 
when  it  was  found  desirable  to  honor  him 
for  his  final  overthrow  of  all  six  rivals  for 
the  imperial  throne,  the  iron-bound  rule  of 
Roman  law  precluded  the  erection  of  a  new 
arch  of  triumph.  Therefore  the  expedient 
was  hit  upon  of  rededicating  the  old  Do- 
mitianic  arch,  and  a  historic  example  was 
thus  provided  of  obedience  to  the  letter  of 
the  law.  R.  F.  B. 


O 


NA     Architectural  record 

A6 
v.37 


PLEASE  DO  NOT  REMOVE 
CARDS  OR  SLIPS  FROM  THIS  POCKET 

UNIVERSITY  OF  TORONTO  LIBRARY