Live Music Archive
Librivox Free Audio
Metropolitan Museum
Cleveland Museum of Art
Internet Arcade
Console Living Room
Books to Borrow
Open Library
TV News
Understanding 9/11A report of the proceedings on an indictment for a conspiracy, in the case of the Queen v. Daniel O'Connell, John O'Connell, Thomas Steele, Charles Gavan Duffy, Rev. Thomas Tierney, Rev. Peter James Tyrrell, Richard Barrett, John Gray, and Thomas Matthew Ray, in Michaelmas Term 1843 and Hilary Term 1844
Bookreader Item Preview
Book digitized by Google and uploaded to the Internet Archive by user tpb.
viii, 24, 25*-120*, 25-891 pages ; 23 cm
At head of title: Court of Queen's Bench, Ireland
"The original intention of the reporters was to have published a full report of the trial, with only short notes of the decisions of the court on the several motions made in the course of Michaelmas Term, 1843. After a considerable part of the work had been printed ... they resolved on publisheing a report of the arguments and judgments on the preliminary motions. In consequence of this alteration in the original plan of the Report, the pages from 25 to 120 are duplicate"--Preface
viii, 24, 25*-120*, 25-891 pages ; 23 cm
At head of title: Court of Queen's Bench, Ireland
"The original intention of the reporters was to have published a full report of the trial, with only short notes of the decisions of the court on the several motions made in the course of Michaelmas Term, 1843. After a considerable part of the work had been printed ... they resolved on publisheing a report of the arguments and judgments on the preliminary motions. In consequence of this alteration in the original plan of the Report, the pages from 25 to 120 are duplicate"--Preface
Notes
"The original intention of the reporters was to have published a full report of the trial, with only short notes of the decisions of the court on the several motions made in the course of Michaelmas Term, 1843. After a considerable part of the work had been printed ... they resolved on publisheing a report of the arguments and judgments on the preliminary motions. In consequence of this alteration in the original plan of the Report, the pages from 25 to 120 are duplicate": preface.
Reviews
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to
write a review.
