Enhanced Detectability of Pre-reionization 21-cm Structure

Submitted to ApJ Letters June 30, 2010

Preprint typeset using I4TgX style emulateapj v. 5/25/10

O
£

O
m

O

u

Oh
i

o

CO
C3

O

o
p

o
o

>

X

ENHANCED DETECTABILITY OF PRE-REIONIZATION 21 -CM STRUCTURE

Marcelo A. Alvarez 1 , Ue-Li Pen 1 , and Tzu-Ching Chang 1 - 2

Submitted to ApJ Letters June 30, 2010

ABSTRACT

Before the universe was reionized, it was likely that the spin temperature of intergalactic hydrogen was de-
coupled from the CMB by UV radiation from the first stars through the Wouthuysen-Field effect. If the IGM
had not yet been heated above the CMB temperature by that time, then the gas would appear in absorption rela-
tive to the CMB. Large, rare sources of X-rays could inject sufficient heat into the neutral IGM, so that ST/, >
at comoving distances of tens to hundreds of Mpc, resulting in large 21 -cm fluctuations with ST], ~ 250 mK
on arcminute to degree angular scales, an order of magnitude larger in amplitude than that caused by ionized
bubbles during reionization, <57i ~ 25 mK. This signal could therefore be easier to detect and probe higher
redshifts than that due to patchy reionization. For the case in which the first objects to heat the IGM are QSOs
hosting 10 7 -M Q black holes with an abundance exceeding ~ 1 Gpc" 3 at z ~ 15, observations with either the
Arecibo Observatory or the Five Hundred Meter Aperture Spherical Telescope (FAST) could detect and image
their fluctuations at greater than 5-<r significance in about a month of dedicated survey time. Additionally,
existing facilities such as MWA and LOFAR could detect the statistical fluctuations arising from a population
of 10 5 -M© black holes with an abundance of ~ 10 4 Gpc" 3 at z ~ 10- 12.
Subject headings: cosmology: theory — dark ages, reionization, first stars

intergalactic medium

1. INTRODUCTION

The 2 1 cm transition is among the most promising probes of
the high-redshift universe. The observed differential bright-
ness temperature from the fully neutral IGM at the mean den-
sity with spin temperature T s (z) is given by

ST b (z) ~ 29 mK

1+z
10

1/2

1

Tcmb(z)
T s (z)

(1)

(e.g., Madau et al.|1997] l. In the absence of an external radi-
ation field, only the hot, dense gas in minihalos would have
been able to develop a spin temperature di fferent from that
of the CMB at z ~ 20 ( [Shapiro et aT1[2006| . Howeve r, radi-
ation emitted by the earliest generations of stars (e.g., Ciardi
& Madau|[2003 ; Barkana & Loeb 2005) and X-ray sources

(Chuzhoy et al. 2006, Chen & Miralda-Escude 2008) could
have coupled the spin temperature to t he IGM temperature
via th e "Wouthuysen-Field effect" (Wouthuysen 1952; Field
1 1959} long before reionizing the universe, at redshifts as high
as z = 20-30, causing the IGM to appear in absorption with
respect to the CMB, with ST b ~ -250 mK.

Only a modest amount of heating is necessary to raise the
gas temperature above the CMB temperature of ~ 30-60 K
at z ~ 10-20. By the time reionization was well underway, it
is generally believed that the neutral component of the IGM
had already been heated to T s 3> 7cmbi an d therefore the ob-
served brightness temperature will be an order of magnitude
lower in amplitu de, 8Tb ~ 25 mK, t han when the IGM was in
absorption (e.g., Furlanet to et al.|2006) .

Clearly, there should be some transition epoch, during
which sources of X-ray radiation heated the neutral IGM,
creating "holes" in the absorption. Natural candidates for
these early sources of heating are quasars (e.g., Chuzhoy et al.
2006; Zaroubi et al. 2007; Thomas & Zaroubi 2008; Chen &

the quasar population at z > 6, with t he only constraints com-
ing from th e bright end at z ~ 6 (e.g., Fan et al.|2002 Willott
et al. 2010 1, with inferred black hole masses ^ 10 8 M , lumi-
nosities <; 10 46 erg s~ l , and a comoving abundance <; 1 Gpc" 3 .

Quasars are not the only high-redshift objects able to pro-
duce X-rays. High-redshift supernovae (Oh 2001 ) and X-ray
binaries could have also been sources. Theoretical models
typically parametrize X-ray production associated with star
formation by fx, normalized so that fx = 1 corresponds to that
observed for local starburst galaxies (e.g., Furlanetto 2006,
Pritchard & Furlanetto 2007).

Our aim in this paper is to explore the enhanced 21 -cm sig-
nature of early quasars. We will therefore assume that the
first galaxies were efficient enough to couple the spin temper-
ature to the kinetic temperature by z — 20, but did not heat the
IGM above the CMB temperature, i.e. /^<1. As shown by

2C

M

Miralda-Escude 2008). Unfortunately, little is known about

Electronic address: malvarez@cita.utoronto.ca

1 Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics, University of
Toronto, 60 St.George St., Toronto, ON M5S 3H8, Canada

2 IAA, Academia Sinica, PO Box 23-141, Taipei, 10617, Taiwan

Pritchard & Loeb (2010), even for values of f x > 1 it is still
possible that there is a significant period between the time
when the spin temperature was coupled to the kinetic temper-
ature and the time when the mean IGM was heated above the
CMB temperature. In addition, the first galaxies were likely
clustered around the quasars and may have actually increased
the sizes of the heated regions. On the other hand, X-ray-
emitting galaxies could have also formed outside the regions
that would have been heated by the quasars, making the 21-
cm features due to early, rare quasars that we predict here less
prominent.

This paper is organized as follows. In §2 we present our
forecasted signal from partially-heated regions and a brief
discussion of the expected black hole abundance at high-
redshift. In §3 we assess the detectability of the predicted
signal under various assumptions about the early quasar
population. We end in §4 with a discussion of possi-
ble survey strategies and requirements of detection on the
high-redshift black hole abundance. All calculations were
done assuming a flat universe with (Q m h 2 ,nbh 2 ,h,n,,as) =
(0.1 33, 0. 0225, 0.7 1,0.96, 0.8), consistent with WMAP 7-
year data (Komatsu et al. 2010). All distances are comoving.

ALVAREZ, PEN & CHANG

2. FORECAST

Our predictions will focus on accreting black holes with
masses greater than ~ 1O 5 M . It is of course possible that a
more abundant population of black holes with lower masses
existed at these early times, left behind as re mnants of early
generations of massive Pop III stars ( [Heger et al. 2003 ), act-
ing as "seeds" for the observed z ~ 6 supermassive black hole
population (e.g., Li et al. 2007), and powering "miniquasars"
(Madau et al. 2004). However, radiative feedback from the

10 Mq in th e first halos with virial temperature
Bromm & Loeb|2003 Begelman

progenitor stars (Johnson & Bromm 2007) as well as the ac-
cretion radiation itself (Alvarez et al. 2009), would have likely
substantially limited their growth and corresponding X-ray
emission at early times. An alternative scenario for form-
ing the seeds is gaseous collapse to black holes with masses
greater than

greater than ~ 10 4 K (e.g.,

et al. 2006). Formation of black holes by thTs mechanism may
have been quite a rare occurence (e.g., Dijkstra et al. 2008 ). It
is this scenario, in which most accreting black holes in the uni-
verse were relatively rare and more massive than ~ 1O 5 M ,
that is most consistent with the predictions we make here.

Because the heating is a time-dependent effect, we will
parametrize the total energy radiated during accretion as E m =
LtQso = cMbhc 2 , where we take the radiative efficiency e =
0.1. In principle some of the rest mass energy, i.e. the ini-
tial seed mass of the black hole, did not contribute to heating
the surroundings, but in general the seed mass is expected to
be small compared to the mass of the black hole after it un-
dergoes its first episode of radiatively-efficient accretion as a
quasar, so we neglect it.

2.1. Quasar spectral energy distribution

We assume the spectral energy distribution of the quasar
is given by a broken power-law, S„ oc v~°- 5 at v < i>\„ and

Bolton &

S v oc v at v > Vb, with hv\, = 11.8 eV (e.g.
Haehnelt 2007), approximate ly consistent with the template
spectra of Telfer et al. (2002 1. If the quasar has a total bolo
metric luminosity L, then the spectral energy distribution is

S v

L

V < Z/b,

v > v h .

(2)

2.2. The 21 -cm profile around individual quasars

The temperature profile surrounding a quasar can be ob-
tained by considering the fraction of the radiated energy ab-
sorbed per atom at comoving distance r and redshift z,

^m(r,z) =

(1+z) 2

, S v a v
dp—, — (hv-

foto)Xi,exp[-7Y/(r)],

4irLr 2 J Vm " hv

(3)
where \v is the fraction of photoelectron energy, hv-hvm,
which goes into heat, with the rest being lost to secondary
ionizations and excitations. In the limit in which the ionized
fraction of the gas is low, 0. 1 < \ v < 0.3 for all hv > 25 eV

( Shull & van Steenberg[J98? i. In what follows we will make

the approximation that S u = 0.2 for all v

energy radiated is Lt qso = eMbhc 2 , with f,

the Hubble time. In this case, the relative brightness tempera

ture is given by

and assume that the
qso short compared to

ST h (M BH ,r,z) = 29 mK

1-

7cmb(z)

T s (M BH ,r,z)

1+z
10

"I 1/2

(4)

50

-50

M

£

-100

-150

E-

-200
-250

-300

-350

-400

01

E-

100 =-

10 =-

10 100

r [Mpc]

10 3

FIG. 1. — Top: Profiles of the observed differential brightness temperature
versus comoving distance at three different redshifts around a quasar that has
radiated 10 per cent of the rest-mass energy of 10 5 , 10 7 , and 10 9 Mp
labeled. Bottom: Spin temperature of the IGM, obtained via equation I

where

T s (M B H,r,z) = T 1GM (z)+ — r ffl (r,z).

3k b

(5)

In calculating the optical depth, we assume that the IGM is
completely neutral at the mean density, «h(z), so tnat T v{r,z) =
rnu{z)(l +z) _1 ov. In reality, the quasar's own H II region will
reduce the opacity at small radii, but given that we are con-
cerned with the small amount of heating happening at much
larger radii, we neglect the H II region when calculating the
optical depth.

Shown in Fig. [T] are profiles of the observed differential
brightness temperature versus comoving distance at three dif-
ferent redshifts. The total energy radiated by the quasar, ZiQso
in each curve corresponds to 10 per cent of the rest mass, as
labeled. Close to the quasar, the gas is heated above the CMB
temperature, and 5Tb ~ 30-40 mK. Further away, the heating
from the quasar declines due to spherical dilution and attenu-
ation of the lowest energy radiation, with STf, finally reaching
about -220 to -340 mK at large distances. The FWHM size of
the fluctuations are about 20, 80, and 400 Mpc for black holes
of mass 10 5 , 10 7 , and 10 9 M , respectively.

PRE-REIONIZATION 21 -CM STRUCTURE

2.3. Black hole abundance at high-z

How do the black hole densities and masses we assume
here compare to those observed at z ~ 6 and expected at
higher redshifts? Willott et al. (2010) constructed the mass
function of black holes in the range 10 8 M Q < M B h < 3 x
10 9 M Q at z = 6, finding it to be well-fitted by dn/dlnM Bll ~
<j>*(M Bii /M*)- 1 exp(-M BH /M*), with 0* = 5.34 Gpc" 3 and
M* = 2.2 x 10 9 Mq. Integrating the black hole mass function,
one finds p BH (> M BH ) ~ 7 x 10 9 and 3 x 10 10 M Gpc" 3 , for
A^bh = 10 9 , and 10 8 Mq, respectively, somewhat larger than
the black hole mass density we find which maximizes the 21-
cm power spectrum (§3.2). Matching the abundance of black
holes great er than a given mass to the dark matter halo mass
function of Warren et al. (2006) at z = 6 ("abundance match-
ing" - e.g., Kravtsov et al. 2004 ), we obtain M halo = 2.3 x 10 12
and 4.7 x 10 1Z M for M BH = 10 8 and 10 9 M , respectively,
implying a value of M B ^/M\ i . i \ ~ 4 x 10" 5 to 2 x 10 -4 over
the same range.

More detailed predictions would require extrapolating the
MfiH-A^haio relationship to lower masses and higher redshifts,
or making highly uncertain assumptions about the formation
mechanism of the high-redshift seeds and their accretion his-
tory. For example, the ratio M BH /Mh a io ~ 10~ 4 we determine
here by abundance matching at z = 6 and M B u = 10 8 - 10 9 M Q
would be a significant underestimate in atomic cooling halos
where black hole formation by direct collapse took place, in
which it is possible that M B u/Mh- d i could approach the limit-
ing value of ilb/ft m ~ 0.17. Clearly much more work is re-
quired in understanding the high-redshift quasar population,
and for this reason the constraints provided by either detec-
tion or non-detection of the signal we predict here would be
very valuable.

3. DETECTABILITY

In this section, we estimate the detectability of individ-
ual sources as well the statistical detection of their power
spectrum. In the case of individual objects, we focus on a
novel approach, using single-dish filled aperture telescopes
like Arecibcr] and FASlF] while for the power spectrum we
will simply refer to existing sensitivity estimates for facilities
such as LOFAR0 MWA0 and SKAQ

3.1. Individual quasars

In order to determine the necessary integration time, we
convolve the profiles shown in Fig. [Tjwith a half -power beam
width of

100

% = 26'

1+z
11

/ ^dish

\300m

(6)

where offish is the effective dish diameter. Converting angle on
the sky to comoving distance, we obtain the comoving reso-
lution,

D ^ 70 Mpcf-^V7^V' 2 . (7)

This implies that the fluctuation created by a 10 7 M Q -black
hole would be just resolvable with a single 300-m dish like

http://www.naic.edu

http://fast.bao.ac.cn

5 http://www.lofar. org

6 http://www.mwatelescope.org

7 http://www.skatelescope.org

l^-l

10

c

»<— 1

e

o

1

■^H

\

*J

<^

0.1

Z

\

C/2

^

J3

E-

T

X

(0

B

1 1 Mini — i 1 1 Mini — i 1 1 1 mil — i i inini — i i mini — mt

z=10 %
z=15

z=20

; I I I I I U-LLli

10 4 10 5 10 6 10 7 10 8 10 9 10 10
M BH [M ]

FIG. 2. — Bottom: Peak fluctuation amplitude, measured with respect to
the mean background absorption (A7b)(j), as a function of black hole mass,
for three different redshift. Top: Signal-to-noise ratio at the same redshifts
for a bandwidth corresponding to the beam width and an integration time of
10 minutes. The detectability declines rapidly in the interval 10 < z < 20.

Arecibo (see Fig. IT), lower mass black holes would be un-
resolved point sources, and the profile of higher mass black
holes could actually be measured. For an integration time of
At, the sensitivity is given by

ST err = 22 mK

At

-1/2

/ , \ 1/2 /I , \ 2.35

60s J V 300m

where we have used

At/ = 4 MHz

ll

-1/2

(8)

(9)

p \ n+z

70MpcJ ^ 11

for the bandwidth corresponding to a comoving distance D,
STar = T^/y/AvAt, and r SYS ~ 3 x 10 5 mK[(l +z)/ll] 27
(e.g., |Furlanetto et al.|2006) .

We calculate the maximum fluctuation amplitude as a func-
tion of quasar black hole mass and redshift, <57b, max (Mbh,z),
which is a convolution of the beam with the individual pro-
files plotted in Fig. [TJ

ST b ,

2
fflD

d69e ie i / dlST b (r w ), (10)

o Jo

where we use a Gaussian profile with a FWHM of f?b(z), such

ALVAREZ, PEN & CHANG

1

1

"i '

1

10 4

n qso = 2X10 S

2xl0 4

Gpc" 3

-

M BH = 10?

10 5

M e

:

/ ■■' / / ■■' /

\ y

\y

\\\

~

-100

/ ■'' / / •' /
1 ■*' / / ■' ^

e

g 10

w

CO

Z ■' /
.■' /
/
1

— I

/ / / .-' /

r / -'' f
/ 1:1
J :' J
/
/ /
/
/
/

z-10

\ \\
\\

\ 1

—

z-15

\

-

0.1

z-20

1 11

til mi

—

1

1

ill I

i ^

0.001 0.01 0.1 1

k [1/Mpc]

FIG . 3 . — Shown is the spherically-averaged three-dimensional power spec-
trum of 21 -cm fluctuations for a black hole density 1 Mq/Mpc 3 , for three
different redshifts, as labeled. Large, relatively rare 10 7 Mq black holes have
a power spectrum which peaks at k ~ 0.03 Mpc~', while for Mbh = 10 5 Mq
the power spectrum which peaks at k ~ 0.15Mpc~ 3 . Such a signal at z = 10
should be easily detectable by LOFAR, MWA, or SKA.

that f?b(z) = 2\/2ln28 g (z), and rj e = r 2 e + I 2 , where rg is the
projected comoving distance perpendicular to the line of sight
corresponding to the angle 9.

Shown in Fig. [2] are the resulting fluctuation ampli-
tudes with respect to the mean back ground absorption,
^7b. max (Mbh,z)- (STt,)(z), as well as the signal-to-noise ratio,
[ST b>m3x (M b b,z)- (ST b )(z)]/5T b , en {z) for an integration time of
10 minutes. As can be seen from the figure both the signal,
and to a greater extent the signal-to-noise, decline rapidly with
increasing redshift. This is due to several reasons. First, the
intrinsic signal declines with increasing redshift because ab-
sorption is relatively weaker at higher redshifts when the IGM
has not had as much time to cool (see Fig.[T|. In addition, the
beamwidth gets larger, in proportion to l+z, while the angu-
lar size of the fluctuations at fixed black hole mass actually
decline with redshift, as seen from Fig. [T]

3.2. Power spectrum from Poisson fluctuations

To estimate the fluctuating background from a superposi-
tion of sources, we assume all black holes at a given red-
shift have the same mass, Mbh, and comoving number den-
sity, «bh- We then generate a realization of random black
hole positions within a periodic box, and calculate the heat-
ing from each source using equation d5V Because the heating
rate is proportional to mass and we assume a random spa-
tial distribution, the two length scales in the system are the

mean separation of sources, r sep oc n Bt [ , and the distance out
to which an individual black hole can effectively heat the IGM

1/3

above the CMB temperature, r bs .. di oc M B ' H . For this simplified
case, in which the spatial distribution of black holes is ran-
dom and all black holes have the same mass, the shape of the
power spectrum is determined only by the ratio rh eat /r s ,

roughly that density at which the signal is maximized; a lower
black hole mass density results in a lower overall signal, while
a higher density leads to overlap of the individual regions, and
the fluctuations become saturated.

Shown in Fig. Rlis our predicted power spectrum for Pois-
son fluctuations of black holes of mass M BH = 10 5 and 10 7 M Q
at z =10, 15, and 20. Because the black hole mass density
is the same in both cases, the curves have the same shape,
but are shifted in wavenumber such that k~ 3 oc Mbh- Be-
cause the individual regions are only weakly overlapping for
Pbh = 2 x 10 9 M Q Gpc~~ , the shape of the curve is quite close
to the Fourier transform of an individual region, so that

P(k)

sin kr

POO

1/2 oc / r 2 dr5T h (r)-

Jo kr

(11)

with STb(r) given by eqs. Q and (|5j.

The amplitude of this signal at k ~ 0.1 Mpc -1
([fc 3 f(A;)/(27r 2 )] 1 / 2 ~ 50 mK) is almost an order of magni-
tude greater than that expect ed from ionized bubbles when
Ts ^ Tcmb (— 6 mK, e.g., |Furlanetto et al.||2004|), which

compensates for the increased foregrounds at the higher
redshifts corresponding to the signal we predict here. For

>l/3 = n 1 ! 3

sep

(«bh^bh) ' = Pbh ■ Our choice of p B H = 2 x 10 y M Gpc is

example, McQuinn et al. (2006) estimated the sensitivity of
various facilities to the spherically-averaged power spectrum,
finding (at z = 12) ST 2 en .(k - 0. lMpc -1 ) ~ 30mK 2 for LOFAR
and MWA, and T b 2 en (k - O.lMpc" 1 ) ~ O.lmK 2 for SKA, for
their adopted array configurat ions and 1 000 hr of integration
time (Fig. 6 and Table 1 o f [McQuinn et al.|2 006 ). Thus, the
power spectrum shown in Fig. 4 would be easily detectable
by either of these th ree experiments at z y 12 for the survey
parameters used by McQuinn et al."|(|2006|l.

4. SURVEY STRATEGIES

Since the signal comes from a large angular scale on the
sky, a filled aperture maximizes the sensitivity. The two
largest collecting area telescopes are Arecibo and, under con-
struction, FAST. They are at latitudes 5=18 (26) degrees, re-
spectively. To stabilize the baselines, a drift scan at 80 MHz
maps a strip of width 40 (90) arc minutes by length 360 de-
grees cos S every day. With Arecibo, a custom feedline with
pairwise correlations of dipoles would allow a frequency de-
pendent illumination of the mirror, allowing the frequency in-
dependent removal of foregrounds. It would also allow op-
eration as an interferometer, increasing stability and rejection
of interference, and enabling arbitrary apodization of the sur-
face. Should grating sidelobes from support structures be-
come a problem, one could also remove the carriage house,
and mount the feedline on a pole from the center of the dish.
This would result in a clean, unblocked aperture with fre-
quency independent beam. Even with the carriage support
blocking, the side lobes would still be frequency independent
for an appropriately scaled illumination pattern.

For FAST, a focal plane array also enables a frequency de-
pendent illumination of the primary, resulting in a frequency
independent beam on the sky. It also increases the survey
speed by the number of receivers used. Only one receiver is
needed every half wave length, roughly two meters. Hundred
pixel surveys seem conceivable at low cost, since only small
bandwidths would be needed, and the system temperature is
sky limited, even with cheap TV amplifiers.

PRE-REIONIZATION 21 -CM STRUCTURE

1U

1 1 ' ' '

1 1 1

X~

kv = 4 MHz

xX

10 5

x X —

^x -

x'X

10 4

xy X,

X'X X<2

// XX -

<5Q= 1140 dee 2

XX x : X -

10 3

t obs = 1 month x^/

Xy^ 1

S'X

x-y :

Z 100

SX

/xX —

S-X /

^ XX^

- y 6Q= 40 deg 2 \

10

X

/ X-X

t obs= 1 da y !

XX

1

X-X
X X

z-10 -

XX

S'x

z-15 :

??-

-

0.1

z-20

1 1 < < <

1 1 ;

10

100 10 3 10 4

n bh [Gpc- 3 ]

10 5

FIG. 4. — Number of black holes expected within a 1-month (upper curves)
and 1-day (lower curves) survey in drift-scan mode that scans each point
in the sky nine times, as a function of comoving black hole density. The
integration time per pixel in each case is about 7, 14, and 25 minutes for
Z = 10, 15, and 20. With a 14-minute integration time, a 10 7 -M© black hole
would be detectable at greater than 5-<r significance (see Fig.|2}

one month survey operating at 88 MHz (z ~ 15) with a 300-
m dish like Arecibo, which scans each point in the sky nine
times would have a pixel size of about 0.4 deg 2 during which
each pixel was integrated for about 15 minutes and 1 140 deg 2
were surveyed. If 10 7 — M® black holes had a number density
of 1 Gpc -3 at that time, one would expect to discover about
three or four of them at greater than 5-er significance since
each pixel would have been integrated for about 15 minutes
at z = 15 (see dotted lines in Figs. SandHjl. Black holes with
masses greater than 10 7 M and similar abundances would be
easily detectable, allowing for followup with longer baseline
facilities such as LOFAR to determine the detailed shape of
their 21-cm profile. Detecting a 1O 6 -M black hole at 5-a
significance would require a significantly longer integration
time on each pixel, about 4 hours, so that only about 70 deg 2
could be surveyed in a month. Thus, the minimum spatial
density of 10 6 -M Q black holes would be about 5 Gpc" 3 at
z = 15. Smaller black holes would mean even smaller fields of
view and longer integration times per pixel, so in those cases
detecting their statistical signature in the spherically-averaged
power spectrum discussed in §3.2 may be a better approach.

Regardless of whether high-redshift quasar X-ray sources
will be detected directly by the means we propose here, it
is clear that the pre-reionization universe offers a wealth of
information that can be uniquely probed with the 21-cm tran-
sition, and it is therefore vital that theoretical models for the
signal originating from before the epoch of reionization con-
tinue to be developed.

We note that the ratio of signal to foreground in this regime
is comparable to that during reionization. With a filled aper-
ture, it may be easier to achieve foreground subtraction. This
has been demonstrated for intensity mapping at z ~ 0.8 using
the filled aperture of GBT (Chang et al. 2010), where a similar
foreground ratio exists of galactic synchrotron to 21cm.

Shown in Fig. [4] is the expected number of black holes
within the field ofview for a given redshift and survey band-
width, versus their comoving number density. A dedicated

We wish to thank J. Peterson and R. M. Thomas for helpful
discussions on Arecibo and 21-cm signatures of early QSOs,
resepectively, and J. R. Pritchard for comments on an earlier
draft of the paper. M. A. A. and T C. are grateful for the
hospitality of the Aspen Center for Physics, where this work
was completed. We acknowledge financial support by ClfAR
andNSERC.

REFERENCES

Alvarez, M. A., Wise, J. H., & Abel, T. 2009, ApJ, 701, L133

Barkana, R. & Loeb, A. 2005, ApJ, 626, 1

Begelman, M. C, Volonteri, M., & Rees, M. J. 2006, MNRAS, 370, 289

Bolton, J. S. & Haehnelt, M. G. 2007, MNRAS, 374, 493

Bromm, V. & Loeb, A. 2003, ApJ, 596, 34

Chang, T.-C, Pen, U.-L., Bandurak, K., & Peterson, J. 2010, Nature, in press

Chen, X. & Miralda-Escude, J. 2008, ApJ, 684, 18

Chuzhoy, L., Alvarez, M. A., & Shapiro, P. R. 2006, ApJ, 648, LI

Ciardi, B. & Madau, P. 2003, ApJ, 596, 1

Dijkstra, M.. Haiman, Z., Mesinger, A., & Wyithe. J. S. B. 2008, MNRAS,

391, 1961
Fan, X., Narayanan, V. K., Strauss, M. A., White, R. L., Becker, R. H.,

Pentericci, L., & Rix, H.-W. 2002, AJ, 123, 1247
Field, G. B. 1959, ApJ, 129, 536
Furlanetto, S. R. 2006, MNRAS, 371, 867

Furlanetto, S. R., Oh, S. P., & Briggs, F. H. 2006, Phys. Rep., 433, 181
Furlanetto, S. R., Zaldarriaga, M., & Hernquist, L. 2004, ApJ, 613, 1
Heger, A., Fryer, C. L., Woosley. S. E., Langer, N., & Hartmann, D. H.

2003, ApJ, 591, 288
Johnson, J. L. & Bromm, V. 2007, MNRAS, 374, 1557
Komatsu, E. et al. 2010, ApJ, submitted, arXiv:1001.4538
Kravtsov, A. V., Berlind, A. A., Wechsler, R. H., Klypin, A. A., Gottlober,

S., Allgood. B., & Primack, J. R. 2004, ApJ, 609, 35
Li, Y., Hernquist, L., Robertson, B., Cox, T. J., Hopkins, P. F, Springel, V.,

Gao, L., Di Matteo, T., Zentner, A. R., Jenkins, A., & Yoshida, N. 2007,

ApJ, 665, 187

Madau, P., Meiksin, A., & Rees, M. J. 1997, ApJ, 475, 429

Madau, P., Rees, M. J., Volonteri, M., Haardt, F, & Oh, S. P. 2004, ApJ,

604, 484
McQuinn, M., Zahn, O., Zaldarriaga, M., Hernquist, L., & Furlanetto, S. R.

2006, ApJ, 653, 815
Oh, S. P. 2001, ApJ, 553,499

Pritchard, J. R. & Furlanetto, S. R. 2007, MNRAS, 376, 1680
Pritchard, J. R. & Loeb, A. 2010, ArXiv e-prints
Shapiro, P. R., Ahn, K., Alvarez, M. A., Iliev, I. T., Mattel, H., & Ryu, D.

2006, ApJ, 646, 681
Stall, J. M. & van Steenberg, M. E. 1985, ApJ, 298, 268
Telfer, R. C, Zheng, W., Kriss, G. A., & Davidsen, A. F. 2002, ApJ, 565,

773
Thomas, R. M. & Zaroubi, S. 2008, MNRAS, 384, 1080
Wan-en, M. S., Abazajian, K., Holz, D. E., & Teodoro, L. 2006, ApJ, 646,

881
Willott, C. J., Albert, L., Arzoumanian, D., Bergeron, J., Crampton, D.,

Delorme, P., Hutchings, J. B., Omont. A., Reyle, C, & Schade, D. 2010,

ArXiv e-prints
Wouthuysen, S. A. 1952, AJ, 57, 31
Zaroubi, S., Thomas, R. M., Sugiyama, N, & Silk, J. 2007, MNRAS, 375,

1269