The Fall and the Rise of X-rays from Dwarf Novae in Outburst: RXTE Observations of VW Hydri and WW Ceti

The Fall and the Rise of X-rays from Dwarf Novae in Outburst:
RXTE Observations of VW Hydri and WW Ceti

D. Fertig^ K. Mukai^, T. Nelson^'^, and J.K. Cannizzo^

Department of Physics, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop Circle,

O ' Baltimore, MD 21250.

(N ■

in

6

ABSTRACT

In a dwarf nova, the accretion disk around the white dwarf is a source of
pj . ultraviolet, optical, and infrared photons, but is never hot enough to emit X-rays,

p^ . Observed X-rays instead originate from the boundary layer between the disk and

^ . the white dwarf. As the disk switches between quiescence and outburst states,

the 2-10 keV X-ray flux is usually seen to be anti-correlated with the optical
brightness. Here we present RXTE monitoring observations of two dwarf novae,
c/3 . VW Hyi and WW Get, confirming the optical/X-ray anti-correlation in these two

systems. However, we do not detect any episodes of increased hard X-ray flux on
the rise (out of two possible chances for WW Get) or the decline (two for WW
^ ! Get and one for VW Hyi) from outburst, attributes that are clearly established

Tj- ! in SS Gyg. The addition of these data to the existing literature establishes the

fact that the behavior of SS Gyg is the exception, rather than the archetype as is
[-^ ! often assumed. We speculate on the origin of the diversity of behaviors exhibited

O I by dwarf novae, focusing on the role played by the white dwarf mass.

Subject headings: Stars

• 1—1 -

5t 1 ^Present address: Department of Physics & Astronomy, George Mason University, MSN 3F3, Fairfax, VA

22030

^Also CRESST and X-ray Astrophysics Laboratory, NASA/GSFC, Greenbch, MD 20771

^Also X-ray Astrophysics Laboratory, NASA/GSFC, Greenbeh, MD 20771

''Present address: School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Minnesota, 116 Church St. SE, Min-
neapohs, MN 55455

^Also CRESST and Astroparticle Physics Laboratory, NASA/GSFC, Greenbeh, MD 20771

-2-

Introduction

The outburst cycles of dwarf novae are understood as due to thermal instability in the
accretion disk around the white dwarf primary. In the simplest form of the theory, the disk
traces an S-curve in the surface density (S)-effective temperature (Teff) plane, with two
stable branches. The mass transfer rate from the Roche-lobe filling secondary is sufficiently
low in dwarf novae that the disk is usually in the quiescent branch in which Teg is low and
hydrogen is mostly neutral. The disk is completely out of steady state, with accretion rate
m at each radius r varying as 7h{r) oc r^, so the accretion rate onto the white dwarf is low
and S increases over time. When it reaches the end of the quiescent branch, the disk jumps
to the outburst branch in which the disk is hot, ionized, and efficiently transports matter
onto the white dwarf. See iLasota I (l200l[ ) for a comprehensive review of the disk instability
theory.

Dwarf novae are well known sources of 2-10 keV X-rays, particularly during quiescence
but also in outburst. Since the accretion disk surrounding a white dwarf is never hot enough
to generate X-rays, even during outburst, we must seek th eir origin elsewhere. A widely h eld
view is that they originate in an equatorial boundary (jPatterson fc Raymond I ll985al Jbl).
which connects the Keplerian accretion disk to the sl owly rotating white dwa rf surface.
The detection of a narrow X-ray eclipse in OY Car (e.g. JWheatley fc West II2003I ) and other
deeply eclipsing dwarf novae in quiescen ce is consistent with this picture, wh ile casting doubt
on the "coronal siphon flow" model of iMeyer &: Meyer-Hofmeister I ( ll994j ). which posits a
hot, spatially extended X-ray emitting region around the white dwarf. In the rest of this
paper, we therefore proceed with the boundary layer model as the basis of our interpretation.

In this view, the quiescent boundary layer is optically thin and hot {kT ~10 keV) while
the outburst boundary layer is predominantly optically thick with {kT ~10 eV) but also con-
tains an optically thin region. Coordinated multi-wavelength observations of dwarf novae
can therefore reveal the physical states of the accretion disk and the boundary layer, at dif-
ferent points duri ng the outburst cycle. Previous ca mpaigns during a single outburst include
those on SS Cyg dwheatlev et al. Iboosh. V W Hyi Jwheatlev et al. Ill996[ iHartmann et al.

19991 ). and GW Lib ( Byckling et al. II2009I ). These three campaigns in particular had dense
enough X-ray coverage through the outburst to enable the authors to study the time evolu-
tion of X-ray flux. Ca mpaigns that covered multiple out burst cycles inc lude those on YZ Cnc

fIVerbunt et al. 1119991) . V1159 Ori fISzkodv et al. Ill999h . and SU UMa flColhns fc Wheatlev

2010l ). Here we present our anal ysis of two sets of X-ray observations taken with the PCA
instrument (jjahoda et al. 1119961 ) on board RXTE ( JBradt et al. Ill993l ). one of a superout-
burst of VW Hyi, the other of WW Cet obtained over three months and containing two
outbursts. These data sets are well suited to the study of transitions of the X-ray emissions

-3-

from quiescence to outburst and back.

Observations and Data Reduction

VW Hyi is a dwarf nova with a quiescent magnitude of V~14 and an orbital period of
1.78 hr (ISchoembs fc Vogt Ill98ll ). In addition to the normal outbursts (once every 20-30
d), it has superoutbursts once every 180 d or so, the defining characteristic of the SU UMa
subclass. The superoutbursts are brighter (V~8.5 vs. 9.5) and last longer (10-14 d vs.
3-5 d), and are characterized by superhumps, whic h are photona e tric v ariations at a period

slightly longer than the orbital period (~1.84 hr). ISmith et al. I ( 120061 ) estimated its white

dwarf to be O.Tlln'^K M© base d on a refined measur ement of the gravitational redshift in the

-0.26

photospheric absorption line. iPringle et al. I ( 119871 ) contains further details of VW Hyi.

VW Hyi was observed 42 times with RXTE between 1996 May 02 13:08 UT and 1996
May 16 23:55 UT (obsIDs 10041-02-01-00 through 10041-02-44-00 except 10041-02-31-00 and
10041-02-36-00), with a typical exposure of 2 ks each and separated by 4-16 hr. According
to the AAVSO data base, VW Hyi went into an outburst around JD 2450201.0 (1996 Apr 27
at 12 UT), brightening from magnitude 13.5 to ~9 in about 6 hr, and returned to quiescence
(V>13) at about 2450216.25 (May 12 at 18 UT). Both the peak magnitude (V<9) and the
duration establish this as a superoutburst, even though we do not have direct confirmation
through the detection of superhumps. Thus, the RXTE observations started ~5 d after the
start of a superoutburst of VW Hyi and continued ~4 d after its return to quiescence.

WW Get is a dwarf nova with a 4.22 hr orbital period, with an average quiescent mag-
nitude of V=13.9 a nd reaching V~ll in o utburst, and also show ing occasional low states

as faint as V=16.2 ( jRingwald et al. Ill996[ ). iHawkins et al. I (Il990[ ) carried out radial veloc-

ity measurements of the accretion disk and the secondary, and assuming a main-sequence
companion, estimated t h e whi te dwarf mass to be 0.83±0.16 Mq for this system. Recently,
Simonsen fc Stubbings I (1201 ll ) have detected a standstill in WW Get for the first time, es-
tablishing this to be a Z Gam type dwarf nova. However, at the time of our observations, it
displayed the normal quiescence-outburst behavior of dwarf novae.

WW Get was observed every day for 90 consecutive days between 2002 Aug 14 and
2002 Nov 11 (obsIDs 70005-01-01-00 through 70005-01-90-00), with a typical daily exposure
of 2.5-3.5 ks. On 9 occasions, the observations were split into two sub-exposures (Oct 25,
26, 27, 29; Nov 1, 2, 3, 10, and 11), and once (Nov 8) into three sub-exposures, which were
correspondingly shorter. Treating them separately, we therefore have 101 observations of
WW Get over a 3-month period. According to the AAVSO data base, WW Get went into

-4-

outburst twice during this campaign; we will describe them in more details below. The last
outburst before 2002 Aug 14 was poorly covered but appears to have ended on or around
Jul 12; the first outburst after Nov 11 started on Dec 10.

We analyzed the standard 2 binned mode data (i.e., 129 channel spectra accumulated
every 16 s) using HEAsoft v6.6.3. We screened the data using the following screening cri-
teria: angular separation between target and the pointing direction of < 0.05°, elevation
angle > 5°, time since the last SAA passage of >25 min, and electron contamination low
(ELECTRON2<0.1). PCA background was estimated using L7 faint model. VW Hyi obser-
vations were taken with 3 to 5 of the 5 PCUs active. Observations of WW Get, on the other
hand, were obtained with 2 or 3 active PCUs. This, however, included PCUO, which by 2002
had lost its propane layer, leading to a larger uncertainty in the background modeling. We
therefore excluded PCUO data from further analysis for WW Cet (but not for VW Hyi).

Since the PCA has little sensitivity below 2.5 keV, and these sources are not significantly
detected above 10 keV, we analyze the background subtracted date in the 2.5-10 keV range.
Since our main interest is the variability through an outburst or through an interoutburst
period, our main data products are the average count rates per active PCU per pointing.
We also performed spectral fitting for completeness, even though the data quality is rather
limited for this purpose.

3. Results

3.1. VW Hyi

We present the X-ray and visual light curves of VW Hyi in Figured] There is a clear
dichotomy in the observed RXTE count rates: the first 30 points (taken during the 10 day
period covering the superoutburst peak and decline) are at 0.25±0.04 cs~^PCU~^ (mean

and standard deviation)
0.67±0.08 cs-iPCU-^

The last 12 points, taken after the return to quiescence, are at

W e have fitted the average quiescent spectra of VW Hyi using a single te mperature mekal

model ( iMewe et al. Ill985l Il986l : iLiedahl et al. Ill995l : iKaastra et al. Ill996l ) with a Gaussian

emission line at 6.4 keV and a neutral absorber. This gives an acceptable fit (x^=0.74) with
kT = 6.4±1.3 keV, metallicity 0.44±0.22 solar, and a 240 eV equivalent width line at 6.4
keV, and a 2-10 keV flux of 7.3x10^^^ ergcm~^s^^. Although multi-temperature models
are more physical an d known to be required in fitting higher- quality X-ray data on VW Hyi
(jPandel et al. II2005I ) and result in even lower xl with the RXTE data, they are not required
due to the modest spectral resolution of the PCA.

-5-

We have also attempted spectral fits to the average superoutburst spectrum of VW Hyi
for completeness. Although our analysis indicates a nominal 2-10 keV fiux of 2.7xl0~^^
ergcm~^s~^, this is below the confusion limit for the PCA data of 4x10^^^ ergcm~^s~^

(jJahoda et al. I l2006l ) set by the Poissonian fiuctuation in the cosmic X-ray background
within the PCA field-of-view in the direction of VW Hyi. Therefore, while we can be con-
fident that VW Hyi was fainter in superoutburst by 0.42±0.09 cs^^PCU"^ (approximately
5xl0~^^ ergcm~^s~^) than in quiescence, we cannot determine the actual flux level or the
spectral shape during superoutburst from our data.

The X-ray state transition took place in 17 hr. The last superoutburst obsID is 10041-
02-30-00, with good exposure between 05:09 and 05:37 UT on 1996 May 12. The average
2.5-10 keV count rate is 0.20 cs~^ and there is no significant change in brightness within
the exposure. The first quiescence obsID is 10041-02-32-OClj, which started 21:10 UT on the
same day, by which time it was already at 0.57 cs~^. During this interval, VW Hyi declined
from V~12.5 (at 07:24 UT) to ~13.3 (at 18:37 UT), close to the quiescent level.

Our best-fit quiescent model predicts an EXOSAT M E rate of 0.6 cs ^ per hal f

which is in reasonable agreement with the observations of Ivan der Woerd fc Heise I ( 119871 ).

array,

It also predicts ~3 c s ^ w ith Ginga LAC, somewhat lower than the observed rate of ~5 c s ^

of ( iWheatley et al. Ill996[ ) . This Ginga observation also included the outburst to quiescence
transition. In this case, the strong variability within each orbit makes it harder to judge the
exact duration of transition (see their Figure 2), but it was definitely shorter than 0.4 day,
and was arguably as short as 0.1 day. In the latter interpretation, the last ~0.3 day of Ginga
data may be interpreted as showing a slight rise from the initial quiescent level of ~4 cs~^
to ~7 cs~^ during some orbits.

3.2. WW Get

We present the X-ray and visual light curves of WW Cet in Figure[2J Similarly to the
case of VW Hyi, WW Cet shows a significant decrease in the X-ray fiux level during the two
outbursts. The average quiescent count rates and standard deviations are 0.65±0.05 on Aug
14 & 15, 0.70±0.07 during Aug 23-Oct 12, and 0.61±0.12 during Aug 26-Nov 11. During
outburst, the background-subtracted count rates are consistent with zero (0.00±0.02 on Aug
17-21 and 0.00±0.03), well within the systematic uncertainty in the background level.

^It is likely that an obsID 10041-02-31-00 was planned between these exposures, but was canceled due to
a higher priority observation.

-6-

The quiescent spectrum of WW Get can be described using a single temperature model
(x^=0.82) with kT = 7.0±0.5 keV, metallicity 0.50±0.10 solar, and a 67 eV equivalent width
line at 6.4 keV, and a 2-10 keV flux of 8.2x10"^^ ergcm~^s~^. The quiescent flux is clearly
not constant, but there is a sufficiently high level of point-to-point variability that we cannot
comment on any systematic trends. Most importantly, we have fitted a constant and a linear
line to the fully covered interoutburst period between Aug 23 and Oct 12. We obtain a lower
xl with the constant model: That is, we do not detect a secular trend in the quiescent X-ray
fiux of WW Get.

We appear to have resolved the X-ray transitions into and out of outbursts in WW
Get. The count rates and statistical errors on Aug 16, Aug 22, Oct 13, and Oct 22 are
0.46±0.04, 0.41±0.04, 0.16±0.04, and 0.14±0.04, intermediate between the quiescent and
outburst levels. We therefore investigate the relative timing of X-ray and optical transitions
in more detail.

The Aug 16 X-ray data were taken between 13:17 and 14:11 UT. In the optical, AAVSO
reports visible data on Aug 16 at 16:22 UT (V=14.6) and on Aug 17 at 12:30 UT (V=11.2).
Thus, it appears that X-ray decline began before a significant rise in the optical. The
intermediate X-ray point at the end of this outburst was taken on Aug 22 between 10:09 and
10:54 UT, which unfortunately falls in a significant gap in the optical coverage (between Aug
21 12:34 UT, when WW Get was at V=13.34, and Aug 24 16:13 UT at V=14.96), but was
in any case close to the return to quiescence. The Oct 13 X-ray data were taken between
13:27 and 14:21 UT. In the optical, WW Get was already at V=11.5 at 10:15 UT. The Oct
25 X-ray data were taken between 20:00 and 20:13 UT, which is after it was seen at V=15.3
at 06:24 UT, therefore it appears that the X-ray recovery took place only after the system
had already returned to quiescence.

3.3. Comparisons with Past Campaigns

In terms of the boundary layer behavior, the single best observed outburst of an y dwarf

novae may well be the 1996 October outburst of SS Gyg (jWheatley et al. 1120031 ). This
outburst had the following features: (1) During the rise of the outburst, the >2 ("hard")
keV fiux initially increases ("enhancement - rise"); (2) The optically thick boundary layer
develops, as evidenced by the sudden increase in the EUV fiux and a simultaneous drop in the
hard X-ray fiux is delayed relative to the optical rise ("X-ray delay"); (3) Through the bulk
of the outburst, the hard X-ray fiux is lower than in quiescence ("X-ray suppression"); (4)
During this period, the X-ray spectrum is softer than in quiescence ("Spectral softening");
(5) The optically thick boundary layer disappears near the end of the optical decay, as

-7-

evidenced by decreased EUV flux and increased hard X-ray flux ( "Recovery at late decline" ) ;
and (6) The hard X-ray flux remains elevated for a period after the recovery ("Enhancement
- decline").

It is worth examining the body of data accumulated to date to determine if these
features should be taken as the paradigm in which to interpret observations of outbursts of
other dwarf novae, for which only lesser quantity and/or quality of data are available. We
have therefore searched the literature for descriptions of well-observed outbursts, and judged
how many of these features are shared by other outbursts.

SU UMa shares 4 of the 6 characteristics with SS Cyg according to lCoUins &: Wheatley

( 120101 ). but failed to show X-ray enhancements at rise or in decline. In the case of VW
Hyi, the X-rays are suppressed during outburst and recover at lat e decline. Howev e r, the
RXTE campaign did not cover the rise, and the ROSA T data of IWheatley et al. I (Il996l )

suggest little or no X-ray delay. iHartmann et al. I (119991 ) observed spectral softening in VW
Hyi in outburst in their BeppoSAX data. However, elevated X-ray flux levels have not
been definitively detected at rise or late decline, although the Ginga LAC data allow the
possibility of enhancement at late decline. As for WW Get, we arrive at the same set of
answers as for VW Hyi bas ed on the RXTE cam paign. As for U Gem, the X-rays are in fact
enhanced during outburst (JMattei et al. Il2000l ). and the outburst spectral shape is co mplex

enough to preclude a simple answer to the "softening" question (IGiiver et al. 112006). GW

Lib is another dwarf nova with a higher X-ray flux during outburst (JByckling et al.
which was also harder. We summarize these results in Tabledl

2009|)

In addition, ISzkody et al. I (119991 ) contains an intriguing report that the hard X-ray flux
may have recovered during the middle of two superoutbursts of VI 159 Ori. However, the
quality of the non-imaging RXTE data of VI 159 Ori is rather low, so we have not included
this object in our table. Similarly, while IVerbunt et al. I (119991 ) shows that the X-ray fluxes
are suppressed during outburst in YZ Gnc, this campaign is less conclusive regarding other
questions.

4. Discussion and Conclusions

This paper adds to the literature of X-ray observation of dwarf novae during outbursts.
Through these observations and analyses, common, if not universal, patterns are emerging.

In the majority of dwarf novae. X-ray flux is suppressed during outburst. This is true
of 4 out of 6 systems listed in Tabled! probably also true in YZ Gnc and (largely) in VI 159
Ori, as well as other dwarf novae for which one or two X-ray spectra have been obtained

in outburst (e.g., Z Cam; see iBaskill et al. II2OOII ). We interpret this as the consequence
of an optically thick boundary layer, which radiates most of the boundary layer luminosity
during outburst. In these majority, the X-ray spectrum also appears to be come softer in
outburst. We propose Compton cooling as a possible mechanism for this, as iNelson et al.

( I2OIII ) postulated for the quiescent X-ray emission from RS Oph.

Standard textbooks such as iFrank et al. I (120021 ) convincingly show that Compton cool-
ing cannot be important in cataclysmic variables if the seed photons are from the heated
surface of the white dwarf in a 1-zone accretion. However, the boundary layer in dwarf novae
in outburst has at least two zones. At the equator, the boundary layer is optically thick, emit-
ting copious soft photons; at somewhat higher latitude, the boundary layer is optically thi n
but subject to these external seed photons (see Figure 8 of [Patterson &: Raymond Ill985al ).
Since the number of soft photons greatly exceeds that of the hot electrons (e.g., by a factor
of 1,000 if the energy of a 10 keV electron is radiated away by 10 eV photons), each elec-
tron can experience many Compton scattering events even though each photon scatters once
at most, thus keeping the soft spectrum largely unchanged (i.e., no hard inverse Compton
component). Since the density of a cooling flow plasma rapidly increases towards lower tem-
peratures, the optically thin region of the boundary layer is predominantly Compton cooled
at high temperatures and predominantly Bremsstrahlung cooled at low te mperatures. The
observed soft-to-hard X-ray luminosity ratio for SS Cyg in outburst is ~ 40 (IWheatley et al.

2OO3I ) . which makes it plausible that the optical thin part of the boundary layer is partly
Compton-cooled, since the two emitting regions lie close to each other within the boundary
layer.

To interpret the X-ray transitions, we must consider the disk instability model in more
detail. The instability is principally a local property of the disk. However, once a transition
from the quiescent state to the outburst state happens in one part of the disk, this propagates
in the form of a heating front, behind which the mass inflow rate becomes much higher. X-
ray behaviors are altered when the heating front reaches the inner edge of the disk. The
optical flux, on the other hand, predominantly arises from the outer parts of the disk, which
have the most emitting area. It is likely that the outburst can start at a variety of radial
distances from the white dwarf in different systems or in different outbursts, and this is
described as "outside- in" and "inside-out" outbursts in the studies of UV delay (see, e.g.,
Cannizzo et al. 1119861 ). It is therefore possible to have a range of X-ray delay times among
systems, and among different outbursts for a single dwarf nova. On the return to quiescence,
the cooling front is likely to start from near the outer edge of the disk, and so X-ray transition
happens when it reaches the boundary layer, near the end of optical decline.

From our own analysis and a survey of the literature, we conclude that the temporary

-9-

enhancement of X-ray flux during the rise and late decline has only been definitively seen in
SS Cyg so far. There have only been two studies that attempt to incorporate the observa-
tional constraints imposed by the X-ray observations of dwarf nova e throughout the course
of an outburst into the disk instability mod el: The calculations of Schreiber et al. I (|2003[ )

were specifically for SS Cyg, while those of ISchreiber et al. I ( 12004 ) were tailored for VW

Hyi. These papers adopt a critical value of Merit = 10^^ g s~^ in the inner disk as the di
viding line betwee n having an optically th i n or thi ck boundary layer, following the empirical
determination bv [Patterson fc Ravmond (1985m. A comparison of the t heoretical X-ray

fluxes shown in Fig. 4 of ISchreiber et al. I ( 120031 ) with those of Fig. 9 of ISchreiber et al

(120041 ) shows the X-ray enhancements, both during rise and decline, to be common to both
models. Thus, the mo del can account for the behavior exhibited by SS Cyg (see Fig. 2 of
WheatlevetaTlbooah . but not those of SU UMa, VW Hyi, or WW Cet (Table 1).

To investigate this further, we have derived the critical accretion rate observationally
for the 6 systems listed in Tabled] We assume that the highest luminosity observed for the
optically thin component reflects (or is close to) this critical value. We have collected the
information in Table|21 including the adopted values and references for the distances and
the white dwarf mass. We convert the bolometric X-ray luminosity to accretion rate using
L = GMi7h/2R, for a range of plausible values of Mi. We also plot the results in Figure[3]
against Mi. For flve systems, the plots are limited to the range of Mi inferred from the
reference cited. For SU UMa, we show three parallel lines over the entire mass range of the
figure, as there are no published estimates for Mi. The objects are color-coded based on the
presence or otherwise of hard X-ray suppression and temporary rise. For com parison, we
also plot the theoretical curves from Figure 8(a) of iPopham fc Narayan I (119951 ).

Unfortunately, we are unable to reach a fi rm conclusion, except t hat th e observationally
derived values are all much lower than what iPopham fc Narayan I (119951 ) predicted. This
may not be a huge problem, since the speciflc values depend on the assumptions made in the
study, including the adopted value for the viscosity parameter, a. The authors themselves
caution against adopting these precise theoretical values, although the strong dependence
on Ml is likely to be a more robust conclusion. T he values we derived observation ally are in
closer agreement with the empirical conclusion of iPatterson &: Raymond I (Il985bl ).

Nevertheless, we propose that the diversity of behavior shown by these 6 dwarf novae
reflects the fact that Merit is in fact a function of various system parameters, and not uniform
among all dwarf novae. In this view, the quiescent accretion rate is already close to this value
in some systems, in which case any increase during outburst will immediately lead to the
development of an optically thick boundary layer and hard X-ray suppression. Moreover,
we propose that the primary mass is likely to be a key parameter, partly because the con-

-10-

version from lu minosity to accretion r a te dep ends on Mi, and partly because the theoretical

investigation by iPopham &: Narayan I (jl995[ ) indicates that the critical rate depends steeply
on Ml.

Looking at individual systems, the inferred critical accretion rate for VW Hyi is ex-
tremely low, compared with those for other systems as well as theoretical expectations. We
note, however, that the distance estimate for this system relies on an indirect argument
without any indication of the size of the error bar, and should be refined. As for the two
systems that do not show X-ray suppression during o utburst, GW Lib ca n be understood as

due to the extremely low accretion rate in quiescence (iHilton et al. 1120071 ). Interestingly, the
inferred accretion rate for U Gem is also low. If the current mass estimate is reliable, it also
has the most massive white dwarf of the 6 systems, which suggests that the critical accretion
rate is also highest. However, both these systems are reported to have developed an optically
thick boundary layer, so the lack of hard X-ray suppression is a puzzle, particularly in light
of our Compton-cooling interpretation for systems that do show hard X-ray suppression.

We believe that we should no longer assume a single critical accretion rate for all dwarf
novae. Rather, we propose that future efforts be focused on determining which system
parameters determine the critical accretion rate. Specifically, X-ray observations of more
dwarf novae with well-determined distances and white dwarf masses should be obtained
through outburst cycles. In particular, systems with extreme masses should be high priority
targets, given the likely steep dependence of the critical accretion rate on the white dwarf
mass.

This research has made use of data obtained from the High Energy Astrophysics Science
Archive Research Center (HEASARC), provided by NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center.
We acknowledge the planning effort by Drs. E. Schlegel and D. Baskill, who were the original
Pis of VW Hyi and WW Get observations, respectively. We also acknowledge with thanks the
variable star observations from the AAVSO International Database contributed by observers
worldwide and used in this research.

- 11 -

REFERENCES

Baskill, D.S., Wheatley, P.J. & Osborne, J.P., 2001, MNRAS, 328, 71

Bitner, M.A., Robinson, E.L. & Behr, B.B., 2007, ApJ, 662 564

Bradt, H.V., Rothschild, R.E. & Swank, J.H., 1993, A&AS, 97, 355

Byckhng, K., Osborjne, J. P., Wheatley, P.J., Wynn, G.A., Beardmore, A., Braito, V., Mukai,
K. & West, R.G., 2009, MNRAS, 399, 1576

Byckhng, K., Mukai, K., Thorstensen, J.R. & Osborne, J.P., 2010, MNRAS, in press

Cannizzo, J.K., Wheeler, J.C. & Polidan, R.S., 1986, ApJ, 301, 634

CoUins, D.J. & Wheatley, P.J., 2010, MNRAS, 402, 1816

Echevarria, J., de la Fuente, E. & Costero, R., 2007, AJ, 134, 262

Frank, J., King, A. & Raine, D.J., 2002, "Accretion Power in Astrophysics: Third Edition"
(Cambridge University Press)

Giiver, T., Uluyazi, C, Ozkan, M.T. & Gogiis, E., 2006, MNRAS, 372, 450

Harison, T.E., Johnson, J. J., McArthur, B.E., Benedict, G.F., Szkody, P., Howell, S.B. &
Gelnio, D.M. 2004, AJ, 127, 460

Hartmann, H.W., Wheatley, P.J., Heise, J., Mattel, J.A. & Verbunt, F., 1999, A&A, 349,

588

Hawkins, N.A., Smith, R.C. & Jones, D.H.P. 1990, "Accretion-powered Compact Binaries,"
ed. Mauche, C.W., Cambridge University Press, pi 13

Hilton, E.J., Szkody, P., Mukadam, A., Mukai, K., Hellier, C, van Zyl, L. & Homer, L.,
2007, AJ, 134, 1503

, -1 iu , -1-^ J.,

Jahoda, K., Swank, J.H., Giles, A.B., Stark, M.J., Strohmayer, T., Zhang, W. & Morgan,
E.H., 1996, in EUV, X-ray and Gamma- Ray Instrumentation for Astronomy VII, ed
O.H. Siegmund (Bellingham, WA: SPIE), 59

Jahoda, K., Markwardt, C.B., Radeva, Y., Rots, A.H., Stark, M.J., Swank, J.H., Strohmayer,
T.E. & Zhang, W., 2006, ApJS, 163, 401

-12-

Kaastra, J. S., Mewe, R., & Nieuwenhuijzen, H., 1996, in "UV and X-ray Spectroscopy of
Astrophysical and Laboratory Plasmas," Eds. K. Yamashita & T. Watanabe, Tokyo:
Universal Academy Press, 1996, 411

Lasota, J.-P., 2001, New Astronomy Reviews, 45, 449

Liedahl, D. A., Osterheld, A. L., & Goldstein, W. H., 1995, ApJ, 438, L115

Mattel, J.A., Mauclie, C. & Wheatley, P.J., 2000, JAAVSO, 28, 160

Mewe, R., Gronenschild, E. H. B. M., & van den Oord, G. H. J., 1985, A&AS, 62, 197

Mewe, R., Lemen, J. R., & van den Oord, G. H. J., 1986, A&AS, 65, 511

Meyer, F. & Meyer-Hofmeister, E., 1994, A&A, 288, 175

Nelson, T., Mukai, K., Orio, M., Luna, G. & Sokoloski, J, 2011, ApJ, in press (astro-
ph/1105.2569)

Pandel, D., Cordova, F.A., Mason, K.O. & Priedhorsky, W.C., 2005, ApJ, 626, 396

Patterson, J. & Raymond, J.C., 1985, ApJ, 292, 535

Patterson, J. & Raymond, J.C., 1985, ApJ, 292, 550

Popham, R. & Narayan, R., 1995, ApJ, 442, 337

Pringle, J.E., Bateson, P.M., Hassall, B.J.M., Heise, J., van der Woerd, H., Holberg, J.B.,
Polidan, R.S., van Amerongen, S., van Paradijs, J. & Verbunt, P., 1987, MNRAS,
225, 73

Ringwald, F.A., Thorstensen, J.R., Honeycutt, R.K. & Smith, R.C., 1996, AJ, 111, 2077

Schoembs, R. & Vogt, N., 1981, A&A, 97, 185

Schreiber, M.R., Hameury, J.-M. &, Lasota, J.-P., 2003, A&A, 410, 239

Schreiber, M.R., Hameury, J.-M. &, Lasota, J.-R, 2004, A&A, 427, 621

Simonsen, M. & Stubbings, R., 2011, JAAVSO, in press (astro-ph/1012.1545)

Smith, A.J., Haswell, C.A. & Hynes, R.L., 2006, MNRAS, 369, 1537

Sproats, L.N., Howell, S.B. & Mason, K.O., 1996, MNRAS, 282, 1211

-13-

Szkody, P., Linnell, A., Honeycutt, K., Robertson, J., Silber, A., Hoard, D.W., Pastwick, L.,
Desai, V., Hubeny, I., Cannizzo, J., Liller, W., Zissell, R. & Walker, G., 1999, ApJ,
521, 362

Thorstensen, J.R., 2003, AJ, 126, 3017

van der Woerd, H. & Heise, J., 1987, MNRAS, 225, 141

van Spaandonk, L., Steeghs, D., Marsh, T.R. & Parsons, S.G., 2010, ApJ, 715, LIO

Verbunt, F., Wheatley, P.J. & Mattel, J. A., 1999, A&A, 346, 146

Warner, B., 1987, MNRAS, 227, 23

Wheatley, P.J. & West, R.G., 2003, MNRAS, 345, 1009

Wheatley, P.J., Verbunt, F., Belloni, T., Watson, M.G., Naylor, T. & Ishida, M., 1996, A&A,
307, 137

Wheatley, P.J., Mauche, C.W. & Mattel, J.A., 2003, MNRAS, 345, 49

This preprint was prepared with the AAS E^TJtjX macros v5.2.

Table 1. The SS Cygni Paradigm

Object X-ray Spectral X-ray Recovery at Enhancement Enhancement

Suppression Softening Delay late Decline - Rise - Decline

SSCyg

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

SUUMa

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

VWHyi

Yes

Yes

No?

Yes

No

Maybe

WW Get

Yes

?

No?

Yes

No

No

UGem

No

?

Yes

Yes

?

?

GWLib

No

No

?

7

?

?

J^

-15-

Table 2. Critical Mass Accretion Rate

Object

Distance'^
(pc)

Primary Mass*^

(Mo)

T '^

^X,peak

(ergs~^)

gs

m Fiducial Mi

' M^

•■0

SSCyg

SUUMa

VWHyi

WW Get

UGem

GWLib

165

-13

260+^°

65

146±25

100±4

-30
-20

104:

0.81±0.19

1.2x1033

1.0x10^6

1.0

2.6x1032

4.2x10^^

0.75

n 71 +0-18

U-' -'--0.26

8.1 xl030

1.3x10^^

0.71

0.83±0.16

1.1 Xl032

1.3x10^^

0.83

1.20±0.05

1.4 Xl032

7.3x10^^

1.20

0.84±0.02

8.4x1032

7.0 xlO^^

1.0

mm for SU UMa and GW Lib
for WW Get.

Warner

'^Distances are taken from [Harrison et al. (1200411 for SS Gyg and U Gem, iThorstensen

"(Il987h for VW Hyi, and ISproats et al. I Jl996l )

The white dwar f masses are taken from iBitner et al. I (120071) for SS Gyg. ISmith et al.

(l2007h for U Gem, and Ivan Spaandonk et al. I J2OI0I )

(120061 ) for VW Hyi, lEchevarria et al.

for GW Lib. There is no estimate in the literature for SU UMa, while the numbers for WW

Get uses the mass ratio obtained by JHawkins et al. I (jl990l ) and assumes a main-sequence
secondary.

The pe ak X-ray luminosities are taken from ? for SS Gyg . JGoUins fc Wheatlev I ( I2OIOI ) for

SU UMa. IPandel et a

and (jByckling et al.

mm for VW Hyi and WW Get, iGiiver et al. I (120061 ) for U Gem

2OIOI ) for GW Lib. These values are then used by the same authors

to infer the highest accretion rate through the optically thin boundary layer for the fiducial
white dwarf mass.

-16-

o

PL,

Ed
E-

X

0.5

0.0

OX)

eg 10.0

I 12.0

<;

14.0

-| 1 1 T"

I I

I I I, I I

H \ 1 h

I'll

I

I VII ,1 I, i| I Ii

I

II I

H \ \ h

'|i I,, M I' I

h |i I I
I III 'l, I,
I ,

H \ \ h

_l L_

1 I

10.0 15.0

Time [JD-2450200]

20.0

Fig. 1. — The X-ray (top panel) and visual (bottom) light curves of VW Hyi during 1996
May. The X-ray data were obtained with RXTE PCA while the optical data were collected
by amateur observers and compiled by AAVSO. Two vertical dashed lines mark the time of
the last "outburst" and the first "quiescent" X-ray points (see text).

-17-

o
u

E4

X

1.0

0.5

0.0- |l|li

CO

o

>

12.0

14.0

"T 1 T"

"T 1 T"

"T 1 T"

I,

I

'i'„;'"i',,,„',i",'i,iiMii

I I

r I

H h

H 1 h

H 1 h

I I

I III

_I I , L

I I I

M-l: ^ r^^

20

^-^T

\ 40

Time [JD-2452500]

^i'

H '-H h

_i I : L_

I 'I Il,|l,l,'ll

I I I I'l II

60

80

Fig. 2. — The X-ray (top panel) and visual (bottom) light curves of WW Get during 2002
Aug-Nov. The X-ray data were obtained with RXTE PGA while the optical data were
collected by amateur observers and compiled by AAVSO.

-18-

-6.0

0.8 1.0

White dwarf mass

Fig. 3. — The inferred accretion rate at the highest flux of the optically thin X-ray emission,
plotted against the white dwarf mass (see text for object-by-ob ject details). Also shown ar e
the theoretical curves of optically thin-to-thick transition from iPopham fc Narayan I ( 1l995l ).